<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Top HN by ALCAZAR</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily</link><description>Daily summaries of the top Hacker News stories.</description><item><title>Top HN · 2026-04-20</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-04-20</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/04/tim-cook-to-become-apple-executive-chairman-john-ternus-to-become-apple-ceo/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;John Ternus to become Apple CEO&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (apple.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47840219&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1531 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 763 comments · by schappim&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple announced that John Ternus will succeed Tim Cook as CEO on September 1, 2026, while Cook will transition to the role of executive chairman of the board. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/04/tim-cook-to-become-apple-executive-chairman-john-ternus-to-become-apple-ceo/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Tim Cook to become    Apple Executive ChairmanJohn Ternusto become Apple CEO    URL Source: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/04/tim-cook-to-become-apple-executive-chairman-john-ternus-to-become-apple-ceo/    Published Time: 2026-04-20Z    Markdown Content:  # Tim Cook to become Apple Executive Chairman John Ternus to become Apple CEO - Apple    *   [Apple](https://www.apple.com/)  *         *   [Store](https://www.apple.com/us/shop/goto/store)        *   [Mac](https://www.apple.com/mac/)        *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Tim Cook is credited with scaling Apple into a global powerhouse through logistics and a commitment to privacy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47840394&quot; title=&quot;Tim Cook’s experience in logistics built Apple into the global hegemon it is today. I hope John Ternus’s experience with hardware can kick off a renaissance in both Apple hardware and software design. Mind you, Apple hardware is already amazing, but hopefully it can be even better with Ternus at the helm. Apple software is terrible, and hopefully Ternus can turn that around. I’m also hoping, without any evidence, that maybe a change in leadership will change how Apple participates in US…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47840659&quot; title=&quot;I think Tim Cook took Steve Job&amp;#39;s vision and really took it to the moon. If you think about the last 15 years, Apple has really become the biggest possible version of itself without losing its values. Tech in general has changed quite a bit though. I don&amp;#39;t know how Steve Jobs would have reacted to AI, and I don&amp;#39;t know where tech itself would be if Jobs were still around. But I do think the next evolution is due and yet to be seen. It&amp;#39;s not clear that Tim Cook would be the one to effectively see…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, there is a strong consensus that Apple’s software has regressed, becoming less stable and &amp;#34;snappier&amp;#34; than it was in the past &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47840300&quot; title=&quot;Wow. Hopefully, Ternus will bring what he brought to Apple&amp;#39;s hardware to their software. The hardware is leaps and bounds ahead of anything else, but their software gets worse and worse every generation. I&amp;#39;m glad to hear this.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47840958&quot; title=&quot;Their software is better than most (if not all) of closed-source universe. That&amp;#39;s true, but the problem is, they were better in the past. I&amp;#39;m using both Linux and macOS close to 20 years (Linux is even more than 20, IIRC), and macOS (aka Mac OS) used to be snappier, more stable, more uniform and had incredibly low number of papercuts around the UI. Now it has some nasty thorns here and there, while Linux is improving steadily and not regressing much as macOS. Apple needs to overhaul their…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47841155&quot; title=&quot;The thing where Linux (and Android, and Windows at least circa 2023) blows Apple out of the water is in UI latency. The built-in animations on Apple&amp;#39;s software are sometimes hundreds of times slower than on their competitors, in ways which can&amp;#39;t be accounted for. Improving interface response times is the single best thing Apple can do to improve their UX. I don&amp;#39;t need an interface which throbs, wiggles, jiggles, shines, and refracts, I need an interface that&amp;#39;s snappy and fast. As far as I know,…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Users hope John Ternus can translate his success in hardware to a software &amp;#34;renaissance,&amp;#34; specifically by addressing UI latency and the need for a &amp;#34;Snow Leopard&amp;#34; style polish &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47840394&quot; title=&quot;Tim Cook’s experience in logistics built Apple into the global hegemon it is today. I hope John Ternus’s experience with hardware can kick off a renaissance in both Apple hardware and software design. Mind you, Apple hardware is already amazing, but hopefully it can be even better with Ternus at the helm. Apple software is terrible, and hopefully Ternus can turn that around. I’m also hoping, without any evidence, that maybe a change in leadership will change how Apple participates in US…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47840958&quot; title=&quot;Their software is better than most (if not all) of closed-source universe. That&amp;#39;s true, but the problem is, they were better in the past. I&amp;#39;m using both Linux and macOS close to 20 years (Linux is even more than 20, IIRC), and macOS (aka Mac OS) used to be snappier, more stable, more uniform and had incredibly low number of papercuts around the UI. Now it has some nasty thorns here and there, while Linux is improving steadily and not regressing much as macOS. Apple needs to overhaul their…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47841155&quot; title=&quot;The thing where Linux (and Android, and Windows at least circa 2023) blows Apple out of the water is in UI latency. The built-in animations on Apple&amp;#39;s software are sometimes hundreds of times slower than on their competitors, in ways which can&amp;#39;t be accounted for. Improving interface response times is the single best thing Apple can do to improve their UX. I don&amp;#39;t need an interface which throbs, wiggles, jiggles, shines, and refracts, I need an interface that&amp;#39;s snappy and fast. As far as I know,…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these criticisms, some argue Apple’s software remains superior to other closed-source alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47840646&quot; title=&quot;Apple’s software is the best in the non-free software world compared to Google&amp;#39;s or Microsoft&amp;#39;s, IMO. But that doesn&amp;#39;t mean it can&amp;#39;t be better.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47840958&quot; title=&quot;Their software is better than most (if not all) of closed-source universe. That&amp;#39;s true, but the problem is, they were better in the past. I&amp;#39;m using both Linux and macOS close to 20 years (Linux is even more than 20, IIRC), and macOS (aka Mac OS) used to be snappier, more stable, more uniform and had incredibly low number of papercuts around the UI. Now it has some nasty thorns here and there, while Linux is improving steadily and not regressing much as macOS. Apple needs to overhaul their…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, citing the eventual success of Apple Maps as evidence of the company&amp;#39;s ability to turn &amp;#34;rocky&amp;#34; software starts into great products &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47840616&quot; title=&quot;Ternus recently gave an interview where he said this about the initial flop of Apple Maps: &amp;gt; “When we started out with maps, it was an ambitious undertaking. It was bumpy,” said Ternus. “But the team had just been over the years just pushing and pushing and pushing. And Apple Maps today is absolutely amazing. If you have the vision and you&amp;#39;re persistent and you keep working at it, you can take something you know that has a rocky start and turn it into something great.” Here&amp;#39;s hoping he…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47840701&quot; title=&quot;Apple Maps is pretty fantastic&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theolivepress.es/spain-news/2026/04/20/eu-to-force-replaceable-batteries-in-phones-and-tablets-from-2027/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;All phones sold in the EU to have replaceable batteries from 2027&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theolivepress.es)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834195&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1117 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 935 comments · by ramonga&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Starting February 18, 2027, all smartphones and tablets sold in the EU must feature user-replaceable batteries and universal USB-C charging ports to reduce electronic waste and consumer costs. Manufacturers must also ensure replacement batteries remain available for at least five years after a product&amp;#39;s final sale. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theolivepress.es/spain-news/2026/04/20/eu-to-force-replaceable-batteries-in-phones-and-tablets-from-2027/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Brussels will require all phones sold in the EU to have replaceable batteries from 2027 – and use USB-C chargers    URL Source: https://www.theolivepress.es/spain-news/2026/04/20/eu-to-force-replaceable-batteries-in-phones-and-tablets-from-2027/    Published Time: 2026-04-20T09:28:34+00:00    Markdown Content:  # EU to force replaceable batteries in phones and tablets from 2027    20 Apr, 2026    [Subscribe](https://theolivepress.es/subscribe)    [Login](https://theolivepress.es/login)    [My…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The EU mandate has sparked debate over whether replaceable batteries are a niche enthusiast preference or a necessary consumer right, with some arguing that most users prioritize thinness and water resistance over repairability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47836517&quot; title=&quot;One of the most frustrating things about HN is that people seem so unaware of how idiosyncratic their preferences are. If you stood on the street corner and asked every passerby what they would change about their phone, I think you would be there all day before someone said &amp;#39;I wish I could replace the battery&amp;#39;. It&amp;#39;s okay to have idiosyncratic preferences (I certainly do), but people should recognize that this law will make phones _worse_ for most people, because this law will force phone…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47835654&quot; title=&quot;Aren&amp;#39;t today&amp;#39;s phone batteries already replaceable with commercially available tools? I can walk into a non-apple store with my iPhone and walk out with a replaced battery 20 minutes later. This isn&amp;#39;t even what drives obsolesce of phones, it&amp;#39;s software updates. If you really want to be able to self-swap your own battery, you can just buy an Android that has a replaceable battery. Do we need to regulate something that isn&amp;#39;t a problem? All regulation has downsides, is it worth paying this price…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents counter that battery degradation is a primary driver of forced obsolescence and that user-swappable batteries would eliminate the need for external power banks and professional repair services &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47840428&quot; title=&quot;It’s been long enough that people of forgotten what’s it’s like. Cameras still have replaceable batteries, there are several benefits: I can have two (or more) batteries, if it runs out I just change it. I don’t need walk around with a USB battery pack and cable hanging off the device preventing me from using it properly. I can put the battery on charge somewhere and leave it, even if not completely secure, because just the battery not the device. This way my expensive device and my data is not…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47837301&quot; title=&quot;Your experience is not at all what I see out there. Most people I know only get new phones because their battery will no longer get them through the day. They hate having to set up a new phone when their old one is totally fine other than the battery. For the people I know that do upgrade their phones regularly, they typically want to give their old phone to someone who would love a usable phone, but can&amp;#39;t afford a new one. Giving a phone with a shot and non-replaceable battery effectively…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47835778&quot; title=&quot;People shouldn&amp;#39;t have to go to a special store or buy special tools requiring special skills to change a battery.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. However, skepticism remains high due to a &amp;#34;loophole&amp;#34; that exempts high-endurance batteries (1000+ cycles) and vague language regarding &amp;#34;commercially available tools,&amp;#34; which many believe will allow manufacturers like Apple to maintain the status quo &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834419&quot; title=&quot;If a battery can do 1000 cycles and remain above 80% capacity it is exempt from this, which is exactly what Apple implemented a few years ago. Low cost phones will be most affected.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834950&quot; title=&quot;I was looking forward to finally be able to easily switch out (i)Phone batteries again - after 20 years - but turns out the lobbyists managed to get a loophole in the law - exempting Apple &amp;amp; Co from making their phones more repairable / longer live-able. &amp;gt; If a battery can do 1000 cycles and remain above 80% capacity it is exempt&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834487&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;The regulation states that batteries must be removable using ‘commercially available’ tools This is doing a lot of work here. There&amp;#39;s enough wiggle room for this to be absolutely meaningless. Anything short of I can slide off the back cover and maybe unscrew two or three screws to replace the battery means that a lot of people are going to end up not being able to replace the batteries.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://awesomeagents.ai/news/github-fake-stars-investigation/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GitHub&amp;#39;s fake star economy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (awesomeagents.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47831621&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;760 points · 358 comments · by Liriel&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An investigation into GitHub&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;fake star economy&amp;#34; reveals that millions of stars are purchased for as little as $0.03 to inflate project popularity, a practice used by startups to deceive venture capitalists and potentially violating FTC and SEC regulations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://awesomeagents.ai/news/github-fake-stars-investigation/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Inside GitHub&amp;#39;s Fake Star Economy    URL Source: https://awesomeagents.ai/news/github-fake-stars-investigation/    Published Time: 2026-04-13T14:00:00+02:00    Markdown Content:  # Inside GitHub&amp;#39;s Fake Star Economy | Awesome Agents    [![Image 1: Awesome Agents](https://awesomeagents.ai/images/logo_hu_197ed95713a0030f.png)](https://awesomeagents.ai/)[Awesome Agents](https://awesomeagents.ai/)    *   [News](https://awesomeagents.ai/news/)  *   [Reviews](https://awesomeagents.ai/reviews/)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely criticize venture capitalists for using GitHub stars as an investment metric, arguing that it reflects a &amp;#34;gambling&amp;#34; mindset where stars serve as a lazy proxy for future hype rather than technical excellence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833003&quot; title=&quot;Can anyone explain why on earth VC&amp;#39;s are making actual investment decisions based on imaginary internet points ? This would be like an NFL team drafting a quarterback based on how many instagram followers they have rather than a relevant metric like pass completion, or god forbid, doing some work and actually scouting candidates. Maybe the Cleveland Browns would do that[0], but it&amp;#39;s not a way to mount a serious Super Bowl campaign[1]. Are VC&amp;#39;s just that lazy about making investment decisions?…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833457&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Can anyone explain why on earth VC&amp;#39;s are making actual investment decisions based on imaginary internet points? The answer is right there in front of your face. Say it with me: VCs are morons. VCs are morons. VCs are morons. Just because someone is rich, you think that means they have any clue what they&amp;#39;re doing?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834071&quot; title=&quot;The answer isn&amp;#39;t that they&amp;#39;re morons. It&amp;#39;s that they aren&amp;#39;t people who &amp;#39;invest&amp;#39; in &amp;#39;good businesses&amp;#39; to make money, but instead on the whole a class of individuals classed with gambling on high risk ventures that will have absolutely massive returns and they don&amp;#39;t care if 90% of them fail and 9% flounder because the 1% that succeed bring in absolutely apeshit amounts of $$ when they are acquired by someone else. Using things like github stars is clearly stupid, but not in the way you&amp;#39;re…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some developers use star counts as a quick heuristic to gauge project popularity or avoid &amp;#34;dependency confusion&amp;#34; attacks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833233&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I don&amp;#39;t think I have ever used stars in making a decision to use a library and I don&amp;#39;t understand why anyone would I do it all the time, whenever there are competing libraries to choose among. It&amp;#39;s a heuristic that saves me time. If one library has 1,000 stars and the other has 15, I&amp;#39;m going to default to the 1,000 stars. I also look at download count and release frequency. Basically I don&amp;#39;t want to use some obscure dependency for something critical.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833176&quot; title=&quot;I use stars to try and protect myself from dependency confusion attacks. For example, let’s say I want to run some piece of software that I’ve heard about, and let’s say I trust that the software isn’t malware because of its reputation. Most of the time, I’d be installing the software from somewhere that’s not GitHub. A lot of package managers will let anyone upload malware with a name that’s very similar to the software I’m looking for, designed to fool people like me. I need to defend against…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that stars are easily gamed and far less reliable than metrics like commit frequency, issue management, and code quality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47832758&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think I have ever used stars in making a decision to use a library and I don&amp;#39;t understand why anyone would. Here are the things I look at in order: * last commit date. Newer is better * age. old is best if still updating. New is not great but tolerable if commits aren&amp;#39;t rapid * issues. Not the count, mind you, just looking at them. How are they handled, what kind of issues are lingering open. * some of the code. No one is evaluating all of the code of libraries they use. You can…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47831859&quot; title=&quot;Honest question: how can VCs consider the &amp;#39;star&amp;#39; system reliable? Users who add stars often stop following the project, so poorly maintained projects can have many stars but are effectively outdated.  A better system, but certainly not the best, would be to look at how much &amp;#39;life&amp;#39; issues have, opening, closing (not automatic), and response times.  My project has 200 stars, and I struggle like crazy to update regularly without simple version bumps.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47831921&quot; title=&quot;The stars have fallen to the classic problem of becoming a goal and stopping being a good metric. This can apply to your measure just as well: issues can also be gamed to be opened, closed and responded to quickly, especially now with LLMs.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong consensus that once a metric like stars becomes a target for manipulation, it loses its value as a measure of quality, leading to calls for platforms like GitHub to crack down on fraudulent activity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47831921&quot; title=&quot;The stars have fallen to the classic problem of becoming a goal and stopping being a good metric. This can apply to your measure just as well: issues can also be gamed to be opened, closed and responded to quickly, especially now with LLMs.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47831876&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know what is more, for lack of a better word, pathetic, buying stars/upvotes/platform equivalent or thinking of oneself as a serious investor and using something like that as a metric guiding your decision making process. I&amp;#39;d give a lot of credit to Microsoft and the Github team if they went on a major ban/star removal wave of affected repos, akin to how Valve occasionally does a major sweep across CSGO2 banning verified cheaters.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.kimi.com/blog/kimi-k2-6&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Kimi K2.6: Advancing open-source coding&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (kimi.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47835735&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;628 points · 331 comments · by meetpateltech&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moonshot AI has released Kimi K2.6, an open-source model featuring state-of-the-art coding, long-horizon execution, and advanced agent swarm capabilities. The model demonstrates significant improvements in autonomous engineering tasks, multi-agent coordination of up to 300 sub-agents, and proactive system operations across complex, multi-day workflows. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.kimi.com/blog/kimi-k2-6&quot; title=&quot;Title: Kimi K2.6 Tech Blog: Advancing Open-Source Coding    URL Source: https://www.kimi.com/blog/kimi-k2-6    Markdown Content:  [Try Kimi K2.6](https://www.kimi.com/)  ![Image 1: Kimi K2.6 hero visual](https://kimi-file.moonshot.cn/prod-chat-kimi/kfs/4/2/2026-04-20/1d7j2jpl3v89kkei5mq70?x-tos-process=image%2Fauto-orient%2C1%2Fstrip%2Fignore-error%2C1)    We are open sourcing our latest model, **Kimi K2.6**, featuring **state-of-the-art coding, long-horizon execution, and agent swarm capabilities**.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of Kimi K2.6 has sparked comparisons to DeepSeek, with users suggesting Chinese AI is now reaching parity with state-of-the-art US models in terms of coding and creativity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47836528&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve always been surprised Kimi doesn&amp;#39;t get more attention than it does. It&amp;#39;s always stood out to me in terms of creativity, quality... has been my favorite model for awhile (but I&amp;#39;m far from an authority)&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47836148&quot; title=&quot;Wow, if the benchmarks checkout with the vibes, this could almost be like a Deepseek moment with Chinese AI now being neck and neck with SOTA US lab made models&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters noted a shift in innovation dynamics, highlighting how Chinese firms are increasingly leveraging open-source strategies while US labs remain more closed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47836534&quot; title=&quot;There is some humor in the fact that china (of all countries) is pioneering possibly the world&amp;#39;s most important tech via open source, while we (US) are doing the exact opposite.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47837032&quot; title=&quot;All great technological advancements have come through opening up technology. Just look at your iPhone. GPS, the internet, AI voice assistants, touchscreens, microprocessors, lithium-ion batteries, etc all came from gov&amp;#39;t research (I&amp;#39;m counting Bell Labs&amp;#39; gov&amp;#39;t mandated monopoly + research funding as gov&amp;#39;t) that was opened up for free instead of being locked behind a patent. Private companies will never open up a technological breakthrough to their competitors. It just doesn&amp;#39;t make sense. If…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. However, significant discussion focused on the model&amp;#39;s strict political censorship regarding sensitive topics like Tiananmen Square, though users found they could bypass these guardrails using techniques like base64 encoding &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47837647&quot; title=&quot;Still, you won&amp;#39;t hear about Tiananmen square from this model. It flat out refuses to answer if pushed directly. It&amp;#39;s also pretty wild how far they go to censor it during inference on the API, because it can easily access any withheld or missing info from training data via tool calls. It even starts happily writing an answer based on web search when asked indirectly, only to get culled completely once some censorship bot flags the response. Ironically, it&amp;#39;s also easier than ever to break their…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47838327&quot; title=&quot;The American models also censor a lot of scientific and political views though.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47838604&quot; title=&quot;Can you provide a concrete example of a US built model that completely refuses to discuss a scientific or political view? Show us the receipt.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.6-max-preview&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Qwen3.6-Max-Preview: Smarter, Sharper, Still Evolving&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (qwen.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834565&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;588 points · 312 comments · by mfiguiere&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alibaba Cloud has released Qwen3.6-Max-Preview, a proprietary model featuring significant advancements in agentic coding, world knowledge, and instruction following compared to its predecessor, Qwen3.6-Plus. &lt;a href=&quot;https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.6-max-preview&quot; title=&quot;Title: Qwen3.6-Max-Preview: Smarter, Sharper, Still Evolving    URL Source: https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.6-max-preview    Published Time: 2026-04-18T10:00:00+08:00    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: Qwen3.6-Max-Preview Main Image](https://qianwen-res.oss-accelerate.aliyuncs.com/Qwen3.6/Figures/3.6_max_preview_banner.png)  [QWEN STUDIO](https://chat.qwen.ai/)[DISCORD](https://discord.gg/yPEP2vHTu4)    Following the release of [Qwen3.6-Plus](https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.6), we are sharing an early preview…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of Qwen3.6-Max-Preview has sparked debate over the utility of benchmarks versus real-world performance, with some users arguing that &amp;#34;State of the Art&amp;#34; (SOTA) rankings matter less than a model&amp;#39;s specific strengths for tasks like coding or following documentation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47836251&quot; title=&quot;Ok I find it funny that people compare models and are like, opus 4.7 is SOTA and is much better etc, but I have used glm 5.1 (I assume this comes form them training on both opus and codex) for things opus couldn&amp;#39;t do and have seen it make better code, haven&amp;#39;t tried the qwen max series but I have seen the local 122b model do smarter more correct things based on docs than opus so yes benchmarks are one thing but reality is what the modes actually do and you should learn and have the knowledge of…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47836410&quot; title=&quot;Many people averted religion (which I can get behind with), but have never removed the dogmatic thinking that lay at its root. As so many things these days: It&amp;#39;s a cult. I&amp;#39;ve used Claude for many months now.   Since February I see a stark decline in the work I do with it. I&amp;#39;ve also tried to use it for GPU programming where it absolutely sucks at, with Sonnet, Opus 4.5 and 4.6 But if you share that sentiment, it&amp;#39;s always a &amp;#39;You&amp;#39;re just holding it wrong&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;The next model will surely solve this&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some developers prioritize the highest-performing models regardless of cost, others find value in cheaper, high-limit alternatives like MiniMax for daily workflows &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47835483&quot; title=&quot;Everybody&amp;#39;s out here chasing SOTA, meanwhile I&amp;#39;m getting all my coding done with MiniMax M2.5 in multiple parallel sessions for $10/month and never running into limits.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47835760&quot; title=&quot;For serious work, the difference between spending $10/month and $100/month is not even worth considering for most professional developers. There are exceptions like students and people in very low income countries, but I’m always confused by developers with in careers where six figure salaries are normal who are going cheap on tools. I find even the SOTA models to be far away from trustworthy for anything beyond throwaway tasks. Supervising a less-than-SOTA model to save $10 to $100 per month…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant skepticism regarding the comparison metrics used, specifically the omission of current OpenAI models and the use of older versions of Claude as baselines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47835109&quot; title=&quot;I find it odd that none of OpenAI models was used in comparison, but used Z GLM 5.1. Is Z (GLM 5.1) really that good? It is crushing Opus 4.5 in these benchmarks, if that is true, I would have expected to read many articles on HN on how people flocked CC and Codex to use it.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834921&quot; title=&quot;With them comparing to Opus 4.5, I find it hard to take some of these in good faith. Opus 4.7 is new, so I don&amp;#39;t expect that, but Opus 4.6 has been out for quite some time.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, users expressed concern over a shifting trend where Chinese providers are increasingly keeping models proprietary and raising prices, leading to discussions about the geopolitical motivations behind state-sponsored AI development &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47835603&quot; title=&quot;The way to develop in this space seems to be to give away free stuff, get your name out there, then make everything proprietary. I hope they still continue releasing open weights. The day no one releases open weights is a sad day for humanity. Normal people won’t own their own compute if that ever happens.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47836189&quot; title=&quot;The Chinese state wants the world using their models. People think that Chinese AI labs are just super cool bros that love sharing for free. The don&amp;#39;t understand it&amp;#39;s just a state sponsored venture meant to further entrench China in global supply and logistics. China&amp;#39;s VCs are Chinese banks and a sprinkle of &amp;#39;private&amp;#39; money. Private in quotes because technically it still belongs to the state anyway. China doesn&amp;#39;t have companies and government like the US. It just has government, and a thin veil…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47836403&quot; title=&quot;Notice the pattern that Chinese providers are now: 1. Keeping models closed source. 2. Jacking up pricing. A lot. Sometimes up to 100% increase.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://theonion.com/at-long-last-infowars-is-ours/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;At long last, InfoWars is ours&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theonion.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47837611&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;570 points · 281 comments · by HotGarbage&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Onion’s parent company, Global Tetrahedron, has finalized its acquisition of InfoWars, with CEO Bryce P. Tetraeder announcing plans to transform the site into a &amp;#34;swirling vortex&amp;#34; of misinformation, scams, and psychological torture. &lt;a href=&quot;https://theonion.com/at-long-last-infowars-is-ours/&quot; title=&quot;Title: At Long Last, InfoWars Is Ours    URL Source: https://theonion.com/at-long-last-infowars-is-ours/    Published Time: 2026-04-20T17:02:10+00:00    Markdown Content:  # At Long Last, InfoWars Is Ours - The Onion  [Skip to content](https://theonion.com/at-long-last-infowars-is-ours/#wp--skip-link--target)    [](https://membership.theonion.com/?campaign=701a500001t94CWAAY)[![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While *The Onion* has announced its takeover of InfoWars, the deal remains in legal limbo pending approval from a Texas judge for a new $81,000-per-month licensing agreement &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47837878&quot; title=&quot;Seems like it&amp;#39;s still not theirs until a judge signs off on it. That sale was scuttled by a bankruptcy court. Now, The Onion has re-emerged with a new plan: licensing the website from Gregory Milligan, the court-appointed manager of the site. On Monday, Mr. Milligan asked Maya Guerra Gamble, a judge in Texas’s Travis County District Court overseeing the disposition of Infowars, to approve that licensing agreement in a court filing. Under the terms, The Onion’s parent company, Global…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47837796&quot; title=&quot;This is not final and still has to be approved by a judge ( https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/20/business/infowars-alex-jo... )&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Creative plans involve hiring comedian Tim Heidecker to parody Alex Jones before transitioning the site into an experimental comedy hub, though some users question the value of associating with such &amp;#34;toxic waste&amp;#34; IP &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47837862&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Tim Heidecker, one of the comedians behind “Tim and Eric Awesome Show, Great Job!” on Cartoon Network’s Adult Swim, has been hired to serve as “creative director of Infowars.” He said he initially plans to parody Mr. Jones’s “whole modus operandi.” &amp;gt; Mr. Heidecker has been working on his impression of Mr. Jones. But eventually, when that joke gets old, Mr. Heidecker said that he hoped to turn Infowars into a destination for independent and experimental comedy. &amp;gt; “I just thought it would be…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47837889&quot; title=&quot;You want to be associated with toxic waste IP? Why? You&amp;#39;re not going to attract any of the audience. You likely could have just chose a new name and built whatever you want to do with this.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47838274&quot; title=&quot;It was barely funny when I read the headline a few years ago. Really weird story, I guess I just don&amp;#39;t understand the humor at all. I&amp;#39;d rather stop hearing about InfoWars entirely.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Debate persists regarding the fairness of the underlying legal judgments, with some arguing the penalties are a reasonable response to years of harassment and others claiming they are unconstitutionally punitive &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47838649&quot; title=&quot;The amount of the judgment seems reasonable for years of harassment against a bunch of people, all done for a profit, plus a bunch of egregious misbehavior in court.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47838773&quot; title=&quot;Reasonable by what metric? I&amp;#39;ve seen judgements that are tiny fractions of this for corporate crimes that affects hundreds or thousands of people. Is it reasonable because Alex Jones can afford it (hint: he can&amp;#39;t, not even if he wasn&amp;#39;t hiding his money)? This judgement ends up being more akin to punishing him by forcing him off of his platform, which is actually unconstitutional even for a shitbag like him.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47838098&quot; title=&quot;I wouldn&amp;#39;t say he&amp;#39;s more popular than ever, I think his peak popularity was during his youtube time. What is true is he was replaced by people who are decisively worse. I&amp;#39;m not sure Alex was really that bad, he was a performative comedian who complained about big government projects. There are a lot of properly racist people who are finding large audiences on tiktok/instagram/X with young people and seem to be strictly worse&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.axios.com/2026/04/19/nsa-anthropic-mythos-pentagon&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;NSA is using Anthropic&amp;#39;s Mythos despite blacklist&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (axios.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47832222&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;455 points · 319 comments · by Palmik&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The National Security Agency is reportedly using Anthropic’s powerful Mythos Preview model for cybersecurity purposes despite the Department of Defense blacklisting the company as a &amp;#34;supply chain risk&amp;#34; following a dispute over usage restrictions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.axios.com/2026/04/19/nsa-anthropic-mythos-pentagon&quot; title=&quot;Title: Scoop: NSA using Anthropic&amp;#39;s Mythos despite blacklist    URL Source: https://www.axios.com/2026/04/19/nsa-anthropic-mythos-pentagon    Published Time: 2026-04-19T18:00:30.246355Z    Markdown Content:  The National Security Agency is using [Anthropic&amp;#39;s](https://www.axios.com/2026/04/16/anthropic-claude-opus-model-mythos) most powerful model yet, [Mythos Preview](https://www.axios.com/2026/04/07/anthropic-mythos-preview-cybersecurity-risks), despite top officials at the Department of Defense —…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters suggest that Anthropic’s strategy of creating &amp;#34;artificial scarcity&amp;#34; around models like Mythos effectively forced the U.S. government into a &amp;#34;lose-lose&amp;#34; position regarding its own blacklist &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833072&quot; title=&quot;The whole artificial scarcity Anthropic created around Mythos / Glasswing is quite brilliant to be honest (I’m Not saying ethical, just brilliant). The commercial gains are one side of course. But consider this: Gets labelled supply chain risk by the pentagon. Hypes up what they claim to be the most advanced hacking tool on the planet. This puts the US government into a loose / loose position. Either deny the NSA access to it, or be called out on their bluff.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833848&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The whole artificial scarcity Anthropic created around Mythos / Glasswing is quite brilliant to be honest Isn’t that just the same strategy OpenAI has used over and over? Sam Altman is always “OMG, the new version of ChatGPT is so scary and dangerous”, but then releases it anyway (tells you a lot about his values—or lack thereof) and it’s more of the same. Pretty sure Aesop had a fable about that. “The CEO who cried ‘what we’ve made is too dangerous’”, or something.…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view the NSA&amp;#39;s use of the tool as an expected acquisition of a powerful &amp;#34;weapon,&amp;#34; others see it as a display of administrative hypocrisy and an alarming step toward a surveillance state &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47832742&quot; title=&quot;The pace at which we sprint toward a full blown surveillance state, with unaccountable oracles sentencing us for pre-crime, is alarming to say the least.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47836838&quot; title=&quot;Of course they&amp;#39;re using it. Hypocrisy is one of the few things this administration excels at.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47832530&quot; title=&quot;This is not surprising. Did anyone really think the government wouldn&amp;#39;t get access to a weapon that a company had that it wanted?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant skepticism regarding whether these models are truly dangerous or if the companies are simply &amp;#34;crying wolf&amp;#34; to generate hype &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833848&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The whole artificial scarcity Anthropic created around Mythos / Glasswing is quite brilliant to be honest Isn’t that just the same strategy OpenAI has used over and over? Sam Altman is always “OMG, the new version of ChatGPT is so scary and dangerous”, but then releases it anyway (tells you a lot about his values—or lack thereof) and it’s more of the same. Pretty sure Aesop had a fable about that. “The CEO who cried ‘what we’ve made is too dangerous’”, or something.…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://warontherocks.com/cogs-of-war/the-f-35-is-a-masterpiece-built-for-the-wrong-war/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;F-35 is built for the wrong war&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (warontherocks.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47839835&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;249 points · &lt;strong&gt;498 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by anjel&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Military experts argue the F-35 is too expensive and logistically fragile for a protracted conflict with China, suggesting the U.S. should reduce procurement of the stealth jet in favor of mass-producing cheaper, attritable unmanned systems better suited for high-attrition warfare in the Pacific. &lt;a href=&quot;https://warontherocks.com/cogs-of-war/the-f-35-is-a-masterpiece-built-for-the-wrong-war/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The F-35 Is a Masterpiece Built for the Wrong War    URL Source: https://warontherocks.com/cogs-of-war/the-f-35-is-a-masterpiece-built-for-the-wrong-war/    Published Time: 2026-04-20T08:00:36+00:00    Markdown Content:  # The F-35 Is a Masterpiece Built for the Wrong War    [![Image 1](https://warontherocks.com/wp-content/themes/warontherocks/assets/home2019/assets/new-logo.png)](https://warontherocks.com/)    *   [Commentary](https://warontherocks.com/category/commentary/)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The F-35 is praised as a peerless technological masterpiece that has demonstrated &amp;#34;technological dominance&amp;#34; in recent conflicts, yet critics argue it is a &amp;#34;one-punch&amp;#34; platform ill-suited for long, attritional wars due to its extreme cost and maintenance requirements &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47840237&quot; title=&quot;Somewhat ridiculous piece. Ukraine, 4 years after, still operates a significant number of jets it entered the war with. This is despite hundreds of attempts to eliminate them on the ground with airstrikes, drones, cruise and ballistic missiles. And naturally F-35s on that theatre would have been a game changer making mass strikes on Moscow possible. For all the dysfunctions of American military industrial complex it remains a fighter without peers (unless you count F-22) or serious AD threat.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47841797&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Meanwhile, modern conflict, from Ukraine’s drone war to naval engagements in the Red Sea to Iran’s own mass missile and drone salvos, increasingly favors systems that can be produced at scale and replaced when lost. The F-35 is a masterpiece. But a force designed around a masterpiece is not designed for long, protracted wars, and U.S. adversaries know this. The problem is that the F-35 was intended to be the low cost, mass produce-able workhorse for long protracted wars against…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47840159&quot; title=&quot;The insight here is, that in current warfare, quantity is the quality that matters. And with quantity, cost of replacement needs to be low, platforms expendable, cheap to maintain and resupply. It, and it&amp;#39;s support infrastructure, need to not easily be detected and targeted by drones while on the ground. F35 is not these things. It&amp;#39;s powerful but brittle, and like many US platforms, too much value packed into too few platforms. Not enough sustain in prolonged modern conflict. A one-punch…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47842751&quot; title=&quot;So none of them lost on ground in Iran. No US ship was to my knowledge even hit by a drone/missle. Iran has been prepping forever for this with Russian/Chinese equipment. This sounds identical to previous arguments I saw of how hard it would be for US to beat Iran in open conflict. China is different but comparing theoretical ability with reality is different also. The only reality we have as of now is that f35 completely dominated the enemy on every single front. It&amp;#39;s insane to see discussions…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters believe the aircraft&amp;#39;s mismanagement led to a &amp;#34;brittle&amp;#34; force that cannot be produced at the scale required for modern drone-heavy warfare, others contend that its core capabilities remain essential for high-stakes theaters like the Pacific where drones face significant geographical hurdles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47841797&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Meanwhile, modern conflict, from Ukraine’s drone war to naval engagements in the Red Sea to Iran’s own mass missile and drone salvos, increasingly favors systems that can be produced at scale and replaced when lost. The F-35 is a masterpiece. But a force designed around a masterpiece is not designed for long, protracted wars, and U.S. adversaries know this. The problem is that the F-35 was intended to be the low cost, mass produce-able workhorse for long protracted wars against…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47841500&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know if you&amp;#39;ve looked recently, but the pacific is, likev pretty big. Maybe even bigger than that. The primary problem with killing carriers is, has been, and will be, finding the things.[1] Drone strikes on oil refineries work because, with few exceptions, the refineries rarely move. You can literally program a drone to go x miles in a specific direction and then drop a bomb. It&amp;#39;s also considerably harder to hide things like drones in big empty spaces. If loitering drones became a…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47840159&quot; title=&quot;The insight here is, that in current warfare, quantity is the quality that matters. And with quantity, cost of replacement needs to be low, platforms expendable, cheap to maintain and resupply. It, and it&amp;#39;s support infrastructure, need to not easily be detected and targeted by drones while on the ground. F35 is not these things. It&amp;#39;s powerful but brittle, and like many US platforms, too much value packed into too few platforms. Not enough sustain in prolonged modern conflict. A one-punch…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Disagreement persists over whether the U.S. is dangerously vulnerable to asymmetric &amp;#34;cheap war&amp;#34; tactics or if the F-35&amp;#39;s stealth and electronics provide an unmatched deterrent that prevents escalation in the first place &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47840131&quot; title=&quot;Increased defense spending actually makes the US less, not more, safe. Everyone we&amp;#39;re going to fight is prepared for an asymmetric, cheap war. We&amp;#39;re vulnerable in how much they can make us spend to wage that war. A million dollar patriot missile to shoot down a cheap drone, etc.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47842751&quot; title=&quot;So none of them lost on ground in Iran. No US ship was to my knowledge even hit by a drone/missle. Iran has been prepping forever for this with Russian/Chinese equipment. This sounds identical to previous arguments I saw of how hard it would be for US to beat Iran in open conflict. China is different but comparing theoretical ability with reality is different also. The only reality we have as of now is that f35 completely dominated the enemy on every single front. It&amp;#39;s insane to see discussions…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47841635&quot; title=&quot;A general war against China is impossible. But a &amp;#39;limited&amp;#39; war fought over Taiwan isn&amp;#39;t beyond the realm of possibility. Which does take it into a kind of Schroedinger&amp;#39;s realm. The US takes it seriously, so it develops technology for it, and China doesn&amp;#39;t invade. But would China have invaded if the US hadn&amp;#39;t prepared for that war? Quite possibly, but you can never know.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stephvee.ca/blog/artificial%20intelligence/ai-resistance-is-growing/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI Resistance: some recent anti-AI stuff that’s worth discussing&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (stephvee.ca)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47839951&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;346 points · 340 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The provided link is inaccessible due to a security block, preventing a summary of the specific article&amp;#39;s content. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stephvee.ca/blog/artificial%20intelligence/ai-resistance-is-growing/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Just a moment...    URL Source: https://stephvee.ca/blog/artificial%20intelligence/ai-resistance-is-growing/    Warning: Target URL returned error 403: Forbidden  Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.    Markdown Content:  Enable JavaScript and cookies to continue&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a sharp divide between those who view AI as a tool for liberation from labor and those who fear it will entrench corporate power while stripping workers of their leverage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47840386&quot; title=&quot;I do understand people&amp;#39;s dislike / hatred for AI but I am equally baffled. I feel like the same people that shout &amp;#39;Capitalism sucks, free us from our labor&amp;#39; are the exact same types that hate AI. The exact machine that will free you from your labor, when harnessed correctly, is the exact thing you hate. The &amp;#39;cyber psychosis&amp;#39; thing is overblown just like the &amp;#39;Tesla ignites its passengers&amp;#39; is. The only reason it gets in the news is because it is trendy to do so. The people getting &amp;#39;infected&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47840648&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The same people that shout &amp;#39;Capitalism sucks, free us from our labor&amp;#39; are the exact same types that hate AI. The exact machine that will free you from your labor, when harnessed correctly, is the exact thing you hate. No, AI will only free us from our jobs, while still keeping the need to find money to feed ourselves. &amp;#39;When harnessed correctly&amp;#39; is exactly what wont happen, and exactly what all the structural and economic forces around AI ensure it wont happen.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47840566&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;The same people that shout &amp;#39;Capitalism sucks, free us from our labor&amp;#39; are the exact same types that hate AI. The exact machine that will free you from your labor, when harnessed correctly, is the exact thing you hate. I think you fundamentally misunderstand leftists/Maxists here. They don&amp;#39;t want to be &amp;#39;freed from labor&amp;#39;. They want to own the value they produce instead of bartering their labor. In fact, Marxists tend to view Yang style UBI as a disaster because their analysis of history is one…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users dismiss anti-AI &amp;#34;poisoning&amp;#34; efforts as technically illiterate or futile given the vast amount of existing clean data, others find the computer science behind such attacks genuinely interesting regardless of the underlying cause &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47840371&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m glad this person found community, but I think they&amp;#39;ve been a bit starstruck by  concentrated interest. At no point in the next 30 years will there not be an active community of people who &amp;#39;loathe&amp;#39; AI and work to obstruct it. There are those people about smart phones, the Internet itself, even television. Meanwhile: the ability to poison models, if it can be made to work reliably, is a genuinely interesting CS question. I&amp;#39;m the last person in the world to build community with anti-AI…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47840433&quot; title=&quot;This whole poisoning intent is so incredibly misappropriated, that I feel sad about it. First of all - there is enough content to train on already, that is not poisoned, and second - the other new content is largely populated in automated manner from the real world, and by workers in large shops in Africa, that are being paid to not produce shit. So yes, you can pollute the good old internet even more, but no, you cannot change the arrow of time, and then there&amp;#39;s already the growing New…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47840940&quot; title=&quot;The only thing more cringe than the seething anger in this blog is the technical illiteracy revealed by an earnest belief that any of these attempts at &amp;#39;poisoning&amp;#39; will have any negative impact whatsoever on model training.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters also noted a historical shift in hacker culture, moving from the &amp;#34;information wants to be free&amp;#34; ethos of the DRM era to a modern focus on ethical data sourcing and digital property rights &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47840891&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m old enough to remember a time when the primary hacker cause was DRM, the DMCA, patent trolls, export controls for PGP, etc.  All things that made it difficult to use information when you want to.  &amp;#39;Information wants to be free.&amp;#39; It&amp;#39;s wild to see the about face.  Now it&amp;#39;s: &amp;gt; If [companies] can’t source training data ethically, then I see absolutely no reason why any website operator should make it easy for them to steal it. It would have been very difficult to predict this shift 25 years ago.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://letsdatascience.com/news/atlassian-enables-default-data-collection-to-train-ai-f71343d8&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Atlassian enables default data collection to train AI&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (letsdatascience.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833247&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;546 points · 124 comments · by kevcampb&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Atlassian has updated its policy to enable default data collection from user accounts to train its artificial intelligence models, though administrators can manually opt out of this setting. &lt;a href=&quot;https://letsdatascience.com/news/atlassian-enables-default-data-collection-to-train-ai-f71343d8&quot; title=&quot;Title: Vercel Security Checkpoint    URL Source: https://letsdatascience.com/news/atlassian-enables-default-data-collection-to-train-ai-f71343d8    Warning: Target URL returned error 429: Too Many Requests  Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.    Markdown Content:  # Vercel Security Checkpoint    We&amp;#39;re verifying your browser    [Website owner? Click here to fix](https://vercel.link/security-checkpoint)    Vercel Security…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Atlassian has faced sharp criticism for automatically opting all customers into AI data collection, a move some speculate is intended to provide a high-signal dataset for a rumored acquisition by Anthropic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833328&quot; title=&quot;I really wish I could find a better source to link to for this. By default, all free and paid customers are being opted-in to their data being used for AI training. All your Confluence pages, Jira tickets, etc. https://support.atlassian.com/security-and-access-policies/d... describes how to disable this, but it also appears that the setting to disable this doesn&amp;#39;t exist (it&amp;#39;s not visible on any of our instances).&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834451&quot; title=&quot;If the rumours of an Anthropic acquisition are true, this makes a lot of sense. Anthropic are probably looking for a clean, high-signal dataset of metadata around business tasks that they can buy.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47837468&quot; title=&quot;Rumors that Anthropic is in talks to buy Atlassian, presumably for the training data. Data poisoning efforts are underway: https://www.reddit.com/r/PoisonFountain/comments/1sqrq24/atl...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Users report that the setting to disable this collection is often missing from dashboards, further complicating an experience already marred by persistent bugs, broken search functionality, and &amp;#34;dark patterns&amp;#34; that make canceling trials difficult &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834322&quot; title=&quot;Atlassian just goes from misstep to misstep. I still use their products quite often. The amount of P0 bugs I experience is absolutely crazy: - Bitbucket workers are hopelessly out of date (self hosted). We&amp;#39;ve had to put so many random workarounds in especially for Docker, as they don&amp;#39;t keep them up to date enough - I have had a bug in JIRA for years where I can&amp;#39;t reorder a new ticket unless I refresh the page - Every new feature they introduce into JIRA/Bitbucket over the past couple of years…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833328&quot; title=&quot;I really wish I could find a better source to link to for this. By default, all free and paid customers are being opted-in to their data being used for AI training. All your Confluence pages, Jira tickets, etc. https://support.atlassian.com/security-and-access-policies/d... describes how to disable this, but it also appears that the setting to disable this doesn&amp;#39;t exist (it&amp;#39;s not visible on any of our instances).&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47835670&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I tried their AI stuff on the free trial, didn&amp;#39;t work at all, tried to cancel, can&amp;#39;t cancel the free trial online and had to write a load of support tickets (of which the support ticket contact form bugged out multiple times). Absolutely insane that this is legal. The only reason to do this is to trick and abuse customers. It would be trivially easy to legislate away if our government cared to. Atlassian seems like a typical entrenched big company, albeit an extreme example. They make money…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834837&quot; title=&quot;The search function in Jira has always been unusable. It’s perhaps the worst part of the entire platform, but nice to see they’re still focused on adding features I will never use.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. The consensus among commenters is that Atlassian has become a &amp;#34;dysfunctional&amp;#34; enterprise incumbent that prioritizes new features over fixing long-standing technical debt and core product stability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834322&quot; title=&quot;Atlassian just goes from misstep to misstep. I still use their products quite often. The amount of P0 bugs I experience is absolutely crazy: - Bitbucket workers are hopelessly out of date (self hosted). We&amp;#39;ve had to put so many random workarounds in especially for Docker, as they don&amp;#39;t keep them up to date enough - I have had a bug in JIRA for years where I can&amp;#39;t reorder a new ticket unless I refresh the page - Every new feature they introduce into JIRA/Bitbucket over the past couple of years…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47835670&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I tried their AI stuff on the free trial, didn&amp;#39;t work at all, tried to cancel, can&amp;#39;t cancel the free trial online and had to write a load of support tickets (of which the support ticket contact form bugged out multiple times). Absolutely insane that this is legal. The only reason to do this is to trick and abuse customers. It would be trivially easy to legislate away if our government cared to. Atlassian seems like a typical entrenched big company, albeit an extreme example. They make money…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47836820&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; internal corruption and incompetence can run rampant This affliction happens to almost every company, eventually.  Nobody seems to have solved this.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/20/deezer-says-44-of-songs-uploaded-to-its-platform-daily-are-ai-generated/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Deezer says 44% of songs uploaded to its platform daily are AI-generated&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techcrunch.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47835928&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;333 points · 327 comments · by FiddlerClamp&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Deezer reports that AI-generated tracks now account for 44% of its daily music uploads, though these songs represent only 1% to 3% of total streams and are largely demonetized due to fraudulent activity. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/20/deezer-says-44-of-songs-uploaded-to-its-platform-daily-are-ai-generated/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Deezer says 44% of songs uploaded to its platform daily are AI-generated    URL Source: https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/20/deezer-says-44-of-songs-uploaded-to-its-platform-daily-are-ai-generated/    Published Time: 2026-04-20T14:57:05+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Deezer says 44% of songs uploaded to its platform daily are AI-generated | TechCrunch  [Skip to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The influx of AI-generated music, which some label as &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; intended to farm streaming revenue, has sparked a debate over the necessity of human verification and curation on digital platforms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47836360&quot; title=&quot;however you might feel about AI generated media, flooding platforms with unlabeled slop is nothing but scammer behavior and we should take serious measures to disincentivize it for both the uploaders and service providers. I do suspect we are in for a lot of verified-human platforms where your fee goes to supporting establishing an artist or author&amp;#39;s humanity beyond a reasonable doubt.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47836618&quot; title=&quot;So we&amp;#39;ll be going back to publishers as curators. Good for the publishers, I guess.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47836665&quot; title=&quot;Honestly, debating these corner cases feels like a distraction tactic. The reality is that the bulk of that 44% is total AI slop: one-sentence prompts entered into Suno to generate 1,000 tracks and extract money from subscribers who stream in the background. It&amp;#39;s the same thing with writing. No one cares that you asked a chatbot to help you reword a paragraph in your essay. The problem is zero-effort slop delivered by the truckload to your social media feed.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some creators struggle with the &amp;#34;why&amp;#34; of making music in an automated era, others argue that the intrinsic value of the creative process and self-discovery remains unchanged regardless of external appreciation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47837033&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m trying to learn music production with a DAW, sometimes I wonder if I&amp;#39;m wasting my time. Part of my reason for trying this was reading how creative endeavors can be therapeutic (I&amp;#39;m dealing with burnout/depression/cptsd). I&amp;#39;m at the stage where sometimes I make something that sounds good (to me) but I know it requires work (in the &amp;#39;not fun&amp;#39; sense) to finish it and even then, it will likely never be appreciated by anyone but myself. Which isn&amp;#39;t a problem if the process itself is joyful, but I…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47839622&quot; title=&quot;I’ve been involved in one music project or another (bands, albums, solo projects, etc) for the past 25 years. During the pandemic, a friend and I decided to make a record together. We labored over it for almost two years and finally “released it” on bandcamp to very little fanfare. A few friends and family had nice things to say, and one random stranger reached out with positive feedback. I get a monthly stream report from bandcamp, and it almost always says zero. I am so pleased with this…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47837390&quot; title=&quot;You&amp;#39;re not wasting your time, my friend. But you&amp;#39;ve got to be very certain and honest as to why you want to learn that. If your goal is being heard and appreciated, well, you better reconsider. If you&amp;#39;re doing it for your own pleasure and pure love of art, absolutely do go on, without any expectations. It may or may not take off, but the samurai must not care.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Technically, platforms face significant challenges in defining and detecting AI usage, as some uploaders actively use scripts to bypass detection tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47836668&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been working hard at this over at SubmitHub, developing a way to detect AI songs: https://www.submithub.com/ai-song-checker These days roughly 20% of the songs coming through our platform for promotion are AI-generated. Roughly 75% of them are honest and declare their AI usage - but another 25% try to hide it. Some of them are actually writing scripts to &amp;#39;clean&amp;#39; their audio so that it can bypass detection.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47836486&quot; title=&quot;No, not really. Spotify is trialling a voluntary “AI Credits” thing where people can highlight use of AI when they release music. https://support.spotify.com/lc/artists/article/ai-credits/ The problem is that subjective judgements by streaming platforms on where an AI line is drawn in music production is difficult. If you human-write a song but use AI to produce a synth stem or bass stem and then mix it down and use AI mastering is that better or worse than if you use AI to help you write…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tryterra.co/research/sauna-effect-on-heart-rate&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sauna effect on heart rate&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tryterra.co)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834184&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;407 points · 213 comments · by kyriakosel&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A study of 256 users found that sauna use is linked to a 5% average drop in nighttime heart rate, suggesting enhanced physiological recovery that persists even after controlling for exercise. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tryterra.co/research/sauna-effect-on-heart-rate&quot; title=&quot;Title: Saunas Lower Your Heart Rate More Than Exercise    URL Source: https://tryterra.co/research/sauna-effect-on-heart-rate    Published Time: 2026-03-26T00:00:00Z    Markdown Content:  Saunas have been around since the primitive years in ancient Finland, and have always been considered to have a therapeutic effect[1]. Saunas are a hot, dry environment used to stimulate our cardiovascular system. During extreme heat exposure, our heart rate rises and our vessels dilate to increase the delivery of…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A study of wearable data found that sauna use correlates with a significant drop in nighttime heart rate (~3 bpm), an effect that surprisingly exceeds that of moderate exercise &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834235&quot; title=&quot;Author here. Methodology upfront because I&amp;#39;d ask the same things: Data: daily records from wearable users who logged sauna sessions via connected apps. Within-person design — each user is their own control, comparing their own sauna-day nights against their own non-sauna-day nights. No cross-user comparisons. Stats: paired t-tests, FDR-corrected p &amp;lt; 0.05, Cohen&amp;#39;s d &amp;gt; 0.2 threshold for &amp;#39;meaningful effect.&amp;#39; Anything below d=0.2 we don&amp;#39;t report as a finding. What we measured: minimum nighttime HR,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users suggest that heat stress provides a cardiovascular workout similar to light exercise &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834534&quot; title=&quot;I recently listened to a podcast about the benefits of sauna or deliberate heat exposure and the gist is that if you get your core temperature at about 39 degrees celsius your cardiovascular system is working comparably hard to light exercise. My take is that your heart and lungs are working out, even if your body is not. Do you get the same benefits as going for a run or bike ride for a comparable amount of time? no, since your limbs don&amp;#39;t get fit, but your heart and lungs do.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others caution that increased heart rate alone does not guarantee improved fitness or longevity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834379&quot; title=&quot;The most important thing you didn&amp;#39;t measure: does this affect long term health in the same way exercise it known to.  That is can I put a TV in my sauna and watch that for an hour every day instead of getting out and exercising - yet get the same better long term health outcomes? My current guess is no.  That is this improves a marker for good health without improving health. However this is a guess by someone who isn&amp;#39;t in the medical field and so could be wrong.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47835680&quot; title=&quot;Not saying you are wrong, but I&amp;#39;d like to see some evidence on that. Just because your heart is pumping faster doesn&amp;#39;t mean your cardio fitness is getting better. Otherwise we could all just snort cocaine and skip the gym. Alcohol does that too, anyone with a fitness tracker can check that.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also highlighted the difficulty of isolating sauna benefits from genetic factors or regional climates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834897&quot; title=&quot;Problem is sauna use and genetic factors corrolate too strongly to make any conclusion to the broader population.  If you live in/near Finland you likely sauna often, as have all your ancestors for thousands of years.  If you don&amp;#39;t live there both are false.  Thus we can&amp;#39;t know if Sauna is helpful for the general population who isn&amp;#39;t of a Finish background.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47835895&quot; title=&quot;Moreover, I&amp;#39;m from a very hot and humid tropical region.  Its normal to ne 40°C with 80% humidity there. And you dont see people having better health or longevity (Yucatan peninsula) .&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, as well as the physical intensity of &amp;#34;proper&amp;#34; sauna sessions compared to leisure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834802&quot; title=&quot;Zero shot you&amp;#39;d make it an hour in a proper sauna for an hour. People have this idea that saunas are always enjoyable. I sauna daily, and its nice up to a point. For me thats like 10-12mins in. From then on, its tough.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.flyingpenguin.com/build-an-openclaw-free-secure-always-on-local-ai-agent/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OpenClaw isn&amp;#39;t fooling me. I remember MS-DOS&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (flyingpenguin.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47831437&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;284 points · &lt;strong&gt;308 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by feigewalnuss&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Davi Ottenheimer criticizes the security architecture of OpenClaw AI agents, comparing their lack of process separation to MS-DOS, and advocates for a more secure, hardened alternative using the Wirken.AI gateway to implement granular permissions and sandboxed execution. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.flyingpenguin.com/build-an-openclaw-free-secure-always-on-local-ai-agent/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Build an OpenClaw Free (Secure), Always-On Local AI Agent    URL Source: https://www.flyingpenguin.com/build-an-openclaw-free-secure-always-on-local-ai-agent/    Markdown Content:  # Build an OpenClaw Free (Secure), Always-On Local AI Agent | flyingpenguin  [Skip to content](https://www.flyingpenguin.com/build-an-openclaw-free-secure-always-on-local-ai-agent/#content)    #…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion around OpenClaw centers on whether the tool provides genuine utility or is merely a &amp;#34;YOLO&amp;#34; product that ignores decades of technical lessons to capitalize on current AI hype &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47831690&quot; title=&quot;Is anyone finding value in these things other than VCs and thought leaders looking for clicks and “picks and shovels” folks? I just personally have zero interest in letting an AI into my comms and see no value there whatsoever. Probably negative.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47832002&quot; title=&quot;One could argue that the discussion is once again about tech debt . Both OpenClaw and MSDOS gaining a lot a traction by taking short cuts, ignoring decades of lessons learned and delivering now what might have been ready next year. MSDOS (or the QDOS predecessor) was meant to run on &amp;#39;cheap&amp;#39; microcomputer hardware and appeal to tinkerers. OpenClaw is supposed to appeal to YOLO / FOMO sentiments. And of course, neither will be able to evolve to their eventual real-world context. But for some time…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47832173&quot; title=&quot;I don’t get this OpenClaw hype. When people vibe-code, usually the goal is to do something. When I hear people using OpenClaw, usually the goal seems to be… using OpenClaw. At a cost of a Mac Mini, safety (deleting emails or so), and security (litelmm attack).&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find value in it as a highly capable, programmable alternative to Alexa for home automation, others are shocked by the high operational costs, which can reach $180/month in API credits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47831746&quot; title=&quot;I find some value as kinda a better alexa. I have it hooked up to my smart home stuff, like my speaker and smart lights and TV, and I&amp;#39;ve given it various skills to talk to those things. I can message it &amp;#39;Play my X playlist&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;Give me the gorillaz song I was listening to yesterday&amp;#39; I can also message it &amp;#39;Download Titanic to my jellyfin server and queue it up&amp;#39;, and it&amp;#39;ll go straight to the pirate bay. It having a browser and the ability to run cli tools, and also understand English well enough…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47832055&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It only costs me like $180 a month in API credits (now that they banned using the max plan), so seems okay still. I have a hard time imagining how much better Alexa would have to be for me to spend $180/month on it...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47831940&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It only costs me like $180 a month in API credits In The Netherlands you can get a live-in au-pair from the Philippines for less than that. She will happily play your Beatles song, download the Titanic movie for you, find your Gorillaz song and even cook and take care of your children. It&amp;#39;s horrible that we have such human exploitation in 2026, but it does put into perspective how much those credits are if you can get a real-life person doing those tasks for less.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite concerns regarding security risks and the lack of &amp;#34;conservative responsible thinking&amp;#34; in its development, proponents argue it serves as a cheaper alternative to a human assistant and can be configured with various backends to mitigate costs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47832207&quot; title=&quot;It worked to launch the creator into a gig at OpenAI. Similar YOLO attitude to OpenAI&amp;#39;s launch of modern LLMs while Google was still worrying about all the legal and safety implications. The free market does not often reward conservative responsible thinking. That&amp;#39;s where government regulation comes in.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47832339&quot; title=&quot;Just to clarify to people focusing on the $180/month price tag. OpenClaw is not a CC-only product. You can configure it to use any API endpoint. Paying $180/month to Anthropic is a personal choice, not a requirement to use OpenClaw.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47832131&quot; title=&quot;Many wealthy people use human assistants to offload mundane work. This is cheap replacement for ordinary people. It&amp;#39;s going to be big. But probably it&amp;#39;s best to wait for Google and Apple to step up their assistants.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47832499&quot; title=&quot;So that leads to a question: Is there a physical box I could buy that an amortize over 5-7 years to be half the API cost? In other words, assuming no price increase, 7 years of that pricing is $15k. Is there hardware I could buy for $7k or less that would be able to replace those API calls or alternativr subs entirely? I&amp;#39;ve personally been trying to determine if I should buy a new GC on my aging desktop(s), since their graphic cards can&amp;#39;t really handle LLMs)&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.androidauthority.com/amazon-kindle-2026-3657863/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Not buying another Kindle&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (androidauthority.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47835775&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;299 points · 232 comments · by mikhael&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Amazon is facing criticism for sunsetting legacy Kindle hardware and prioritizing its ad-driven ecosystem over digital ownership, prompting users to switch to more open, repairable, and feature-rich alternatives like Kobo and Onyx Boox. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.androidauthority.com/amazon-kindle-2026-3657863/&quot; title=&quot;Title: I’m never buying another Kindle, and neither should you    URL Source: https://www.androidauthority.com/amazon-kindle-2026-3657863/    Published Time: 2026-04-20T10:00:38+00:00    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: Amazon Kindle Oasis with warmth and brightness slider](https://www.androidauthority.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Amazon-Kindle-Oasis-with-warmth-and-brightness-slider.jpg)    I’ve carried a Kindle in my bag for over a decade. Through every hardware iteration, from the physical keyboard…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on Amazon ending store support for pre-2013 Kindles, with some arguing that a decade of support is reasonable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47836491&quot; title=&quot;I can understand why one would want to move from Kindle to another device, but this article starts by complaining that support is being dropped for devices from before 2013. I can even understand being upset by this, but I have absolutely no faith that whatever other device I switch to will still be supported in 10+ years. Could be. But I sure wouldn&amp;#39;t count on it.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; while others criticize the loss of core functionality like re-registering devices after a factory reset &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47837211&quot; title=&quot;Usually an unsupported device stops getting new functionality and security fixes. The unsupported Kindles lose existing functionality, i.e. the ability to add books. Not quite bricked unlike, say, Sonos, but you are limited to the books y already downloaded to them. This is inherent to DRM, and the reason why I would never have considered buying one in the first place. The eReader I have is a PocketBook Versa. Same price as a Kindle, extensible using microSD and I can add my non-DRM books…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47835906&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Amazon recently confirmed that starting May 20, these older models will lose all access to the Kindle Store. While you can technically keep reading books already on the device, the real kicker is the factory reset limitation built into the software. If you ever need to reset your device or try to register it to a new account after the deadline, it becomes a literal paperweight. is this true though? You can&amp;#39;t browse the store on the device, but you can buy and manage your books on amazon.com,…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical justifications for the shift include the transition from the PDF-based AZW format to the more modern KFX format, which enables &amp;#34;Enhanced Typesetting&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47836827&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s also not mentioned is that the discontinued devices don&amp;#39;t support KFX. KFX is the modern kindle format, AZW meanwhile is heavily PDF-based. KFX was designed ground-up by Amazon, supports every modern feature they could think of, and presumably couldn&amp;#39;t be backported to 2013 and earlier Kindles; AZW meanwhile was basically a wrapper around a subset of PDF. KFX is a complete redo, notable enough it&amp;#39;s what &amp;#39;Enhanced Typesetting&amp;#39; on every Kindle product page means, not a small DRM upgrade.…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Users also debated the value of e-readers given ebook price-fixing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47836725&quot; title=&quot;In my view the death of the eReader is just the price fixing on ebooks -- that ebooks are sold at par with at a premium to physical books still bothers me, and I think is responsible for the fact that the Kindle is dying -- Amazon can&amp;#39;t move enough ebooks at these price levels to be worth investing anything in interested new hardware.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47837193&quot; title=&quot;Sure you can. An ebook has zero cost of distribution and no middlemen. A physical book has to be typeset, printed, shipped to stores, shipped to customers, marketed in store, etc etc etc. If a physical book is sold for $10 at least half that is printing, distribution and retail. Like the GP, the price fixing of ebooks at the Dane price as physical books mothers me as well, particularly because physical books can be sold, lent or given away. The exact same thing happened when CDs launched. They…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt; and the benefits of physical books &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47839696&quot; title=&quot;Besides portability, what other benefits are there to using e-books? I vastly prefer having a physical copy of a book, mainly because I’d rather not look at a screen while reading (unless necessary.) Plus, I love lending out books to friends, and I feel like it’s a much bigger pain to do so virtually (unless they’re tech savvy!)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, with several participants recommending open alternatives like Kobo or PocketBook to avoid DRM and ecosystem lock-in &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47837211&quot; title=&quot;Usually an unsupported device stops getting new functionality and security fixes. The unsupported Kindles lose existing functionality, i.e. the ability to add books. Not quite bricked unlike, say, Sonos, but you are limited to the books y already downloaded to them. This is inherent to DRM, and the reason why I would never have considered buying one in the first place. The eReader I have is a PocketBook Versa. Same price as a Kindle, extensible using microSD and I can add my non-DRM books…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47836408&quot; title=&quot;The site causes cancer but the conclusion of TFA is sensible: just get a Kobo and be done with it. I had a Kindle for years but there&amp;#39;s no reason to stick to Amazon for e-readers anymore.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.rts.ch/info/monde/2026/article/tesla-dissimule-des-milliers-d-incidents-de-conduite-autonome-mortels-29214161.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tesla concealed fatal accidents to continue testing autonomous driving&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (rts.ch)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833156&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;313 points · 189 comments · by doener&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A massive data leak reveals that Tesla concealed over 1,000 accidents and 2,400 spontaneous acceleration complaints related to its Autopilot system, leading a U.S. jury to award victims $243 million in damages while federal authorities investigate the company for potentially misleading consumers about safety. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.rts.ch/info/monde/2026/article/tesla-dissimule-des-milliers-d-incidents-de-conduite-autonome-mortels-29214161.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Comment Tesla a caché des accidents fatals pour continuer à tester la conduite autonome sur les routes    URL Source: https://www.rts.ch/info/monde/2026/article/tesla-dissimule-des-milliers-d-incidents-de-conduite-autonome-mortels-29214161.html    Published Time: 2026-04-17T06:32:37+02:00    Markdown Content:  # Comment Tesla a caché des accidents fatals pour continuer à tester la conduite autonome sur les routes | RTS    [](https://www.rts.ch/ &amp;#39;Accueil : Radio Télévision Suisse&amp;#39;)    *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on allegations that Tesla’s software disengages seconds before impact to avoid being recorded as active during fatal accidents &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833458&quot; title=&quot;Teslas turning off autopilot seconds before a crash, apparently avoiding being recorded as active during an incident, is wild https://futurism.com/tesla-nhtsa-autopilot-report&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833743&quot; title=&quot;To be fair, that report says &amp;gt; the self-driving feature had “aborted vehicle control less than one second prior to the first impact” It seems right to me that the self-driving feature aborts vehicle control as soon as it is in a situation it can’t resolve. If there’s evidence that Tesla is actively using this to “prove” that FSD is not behind a crash, I’m happy to change my mind. For me, probably 5s prior is a reasonable limit.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that Tesla has the highest fatal accident rate in the U.S. and that its safety awards do not reflect real-world performance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833361&quot; title=&quot;To pile on to this pathetic excuse for a company: anyone considering buying a Tesla should know that they are the #1 brand for fatal accidents in the United States, with over twice the accident rate of a typical automaker: https://www.roadandtrack.com/news/a62919131/tesla-has-highes... This terrible statistic can’t just be explained by aggressive driving owners or some other factor like that. Dodge has plenty of aggressive drivers buying their 700HP V8 rear wheel drive vehicles but they have…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend that the system is merely a driver-assistance tool that rightfully aborts when it can no longer resolve a situation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833743&quot; title=&quot;To be fair, that report says &amp;gt; the self-driving feature had “aborted vehicle control less than one second prior to the first impact” It seems right to me that the self-driving feature aborts vehicle control as soon as it is in a situation it can’t resolve. If there’s evidence that Tesla is actively using this to “prove” that FSD is not behind a crash, I’m happy to change my mind. For me, probably 5s prior is a reasonable limit.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833657&quot; title=&quot;Here we go again.  Autopilot != FSD.  Autopilot is not &amp;#39;autonomous&amp;#39; driving.  It&amp;#39;s lane keep with adaptive cruise control.  The same system that Honda, Toyota, etc have.  Yes the naming is wrong, the marketing is bad, but I don&amp;#39;t see it as much worse as Toyota safety sense.  If you use it to be &amp;#39;safe&amp;#39; you&amp;#39;re going swerve off the highway into a ditch.  I used super cruise from GM in my friends suv.  As soon as lane markers go away on a bridge, I almost hit the railing. I&amp;#39;ll get downvoted but…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Users expressed deep skepticism regarding the safety of &amp;#34;supervised&amp;#34; autonomy, noting that the need for split-second human intervention makes the systems more stressful than manual driving &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833582&quot; title=&quot;I think this is part of the reason I am wary of trying it ( including some of the competitor&amp;#39;s variants ). They all want you to pay attention, because you may be forced to make a decision out of the blue. I might as well be in control all the time and not try to course correct at the literal last second.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833791&quot; title=&quot;Treat it like a driver assistance system. I treat FSD the same as I treat Augmented Cruise Control and Lane Keep Assist in my CRV. I keep my hands on the steering wheel and follow along with the decision making.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833597&quot; title=&quot;A self driving car should have no steering wheel. If it has a steering wheel it is a vote of no confidence from the manufacturer.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://opensource.posit.co/blog/2026-04-20_ggsql_alpha_release/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ggsql: A Grammar of Graphics for SQL&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (opensource.posit.co)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833558&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;390 points · 78 comments · by thomasp85&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Posit has announced the alpha release of **ggsql**, a grammar of graphics implementation that allows users to create structured, declarative visualizations directly within SQL queries. Designed for SQL-centric workflows, it integrates with tools like Quarto and Jupyter to provide composable plotting without requiring R or Python. &lt;a href=&quot;https://opensource.posit.co/blog/2026-04-20_ggsql_alpha_release/&quot; title=&quot;ggsql: A grammar of graphics for SQL    Introducing ggsql, a grammar of graphics for SQL that lets you describe visualizations directly inside SQL queries.    [![Posit Open Source](/posit-open-source-logo-light_hu_cb6da56f7d1f6b50.png)](/)  [![Posit Open Source](/posit-open-source-logo-dark_hu_921746bdc15456d9.png)](/)    * [Software](/software/ &amp;#39;Software&amp;#39;)  * [People](/people/ &amp;#39;People&amp;#39;)  * [Events](/events/ &amp;#39;Events&amp;#39;)  * [Resources](/resources/ &amp;#39;Resources&amp;#39;)  * [Blog](/blog/ &amp;#39;Blog&amp;#39;)  * [About](/about/…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Posit’s ggsql introduces a Grammar of Graphics DSL for SQL, allowing users to generate visualizations directly from databases like DuckDB and SQLite without first moving data into R or Python &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834545&quot; title=&quot;I skimmed the article for an explanation of why this is needed, what problem it solves, and didn&amp;#39;t find one I could follow. Is the point that we want to be able to ask for visualizations directly against tables in remote SQL databases, instead of having to first pull the data into R data frames so we can run ggplot on it? But why create a new SQL-like language? We already have a package, dbplyr, that translates between R and SQL. Wouldn&amp;#39;t it be more direct to extend ggplot to support dbplyr tbl…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834407&quot; title=&quot;ggsql has the concept of a &amp;#39;reader&amp;#39;, which can be thought of as the way ggsql interfaces with a SQL database. It handles the connection to the database and generating the correct dialect of SQL for that database. As an alpha, we support just a few readers today: duckdb, sqlite, and an experimental ODBC reader. We have largely been focusing development mainly around driving duckdb with local files, though duckdb has extensions to talk to some other types of database. The idea is that ggsql takes…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833559&quot; title=&quot;The new visualisation tool from Posit. Combines SQL with the grammar of graphics, known from ggplot2, D3, and plotnine&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find the documentation unclear regarding its architecture &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834138&quot; title=&quot;Maybe I skim read it too fast, but I did not find any clear description in the blog post or website docs of how this relates to SQL databases I was kind of guessing that it doesn&amp;#39;t run in a database, that it&amp;#39;s a SQL-like syntax for a visualisation DSL handled by front end chart library. That appears to be what is described in https://ggsql.org/get_started/anatomy.html But then https://ggsql.org/faq.html has a section, &amp;#39;Can I use SQL queries inside the VISUALISE clause,&amp;#39; which says, &amp;#39;Some parts…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, the project aims to empower SQL specialists and simplify plotting by translating statistical operations into SQL queries that execute on the database backend &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834545&quot; title=&quot;I skimmed the article for an explanation of why this is needed, what problem it solves, and didn&amp;#39;t find one I could follow. Is the point that we want to be able to ask for visualizations directly against tables in remote SQL databases, instead of having to first pull the data into R data frames so we can run ggplot on it? But why create a new SQL-like language? We already have a package, dbplyr, that translates between R and SQL. Wouldn&amp;#39;t it be more direct to extend ggplot to support dbplyr tbl…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834407&quot; title=&quot;ggsql has the concept of a &amp;#39;reader&amp;#39;, which can be thought of as the way ggsql interfaces with a SQL database. It handles the connection to the database and generating the correct dialect of SQL for that database. As an alpha, we support just a few readers today: duckdb, sqlite, and an experimental ODBC reader. We have largely been focusing development mainly around driving duckdb with local files, though duckdb has extensions to talk to some other types of database. The idea is that ggsql takes…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834991&quot; title=&quot;I was quite psyched when I read this so maybe I can tell you why it&amp;#39;s interesting to me, although I agree the announcement could have done a better job at it. In my experience, the only thing data fields share is SQL (analysts, scientists and engineers). As you said, you could do the same in R, but your project may not be written in R, or Python, but it likely uses an SQL database and some engine to access the data. Also I&amp;#39;ve been using marimo notebooks a lot of analysis where it&amp;#39;s so easy to…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics question the need for &amp;#34;yet another DSL&amp;#34; over existing tools like `dbplyr`, though proponents highlight its potential for unified workflows in notebooks and agentic analytics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47838395&quot; title=&quot;I applaud the project, and I completely agree that the concepts maps nicely to SQL. The R equivalent of a WITH data prep block followed by the VISUALIZE is pretty much how all my plotting code is structured. However, I don&amp;#39;t see what the benefits of this are (other than having a simple DSL, but that creates the yet another DSL problme) over ggplot2. What do I gain by using this over ggplot2 in R? The only problem, and the only reason I ever leave ggplot2 for visualizations, is how difficult it…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834991&quot; title=&quot;I was quite psyched when I read this so maybe I can tell you why it&amp;#39;s interesting to me, although I agree the announcement could have done a better job at it. In my experience, the only thing data fields share is SQL (analysts, scientists and engineers). As you said, you could do the same in R, but your project may not be written in R, or Python, but it likely uses an SQL database and some engine to access the data. Also I&amp;#39;ve been using marimo notebooks a lot of analysis where it&amp;#39;s so easy to…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834790&quot; title=&quot;ok, this is definitely up my alley. color me nerd-sniped and forgive the onslaught of questions. my questions are less about the syntax, which i&amp;#39;m largely familiar with knowing both SQL and ggplot. i&amp;#39;m more interested in the backend architecture. Looking at the Cargo.toml [1], I was surprised to not see a visualization dependency like D3 or Vega. Is this intentional? I&amp;#39;m certainly going to take this for a spin and I think this could be incredible for agentic analytics. I&amp;#39;m mostly curious right…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Notably, the tool adheres to a reproducibility ethos, intentionally omitting features for manual plot adjustments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47835626&quot; title=&quot;My answers will probably disappoint 1) No (unless you count &amp;#39;render to image and insert that into your excel document&amp;#39;)  2) This is not possible - manual adjustments are not reproducible and we live by that ethos&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cge0grppe3po&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The insider trading suspicions looming over Trump&amp;#39;s presidency&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47829486&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;297 points · 151 comments · by blondie9x&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Market data shows a consistent pattern of massive, suspicious trades occurring just minutes before President Trump&amp;#39;s market-moving announcements, fueling allegations of illegal insider trading by administration insiders or associates. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cge0grppe3po&quot; title=&quot;Title: The insider trading suspicions looming over Trump&amp;#39;s presidency    URL Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cge0grppe3po    Published Time: 2026-04-19T23:02:06.081Z    Markdown Content:  # The insider trading suspicions looming over Trump&amp;#39;s presidency    [Skip to content](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cge0grppe3po#bbc-main)    [Watch Live](https://www.bbc.com/watch-live-news/)    [](https://www.bbc.com/)    *   [Home](https://www.bbc.com/)   *   [News](https://www.bbc.com/news)   *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that government officials should be prohibited from trading individual equities entirely, as their access to material non-public information makes preventing insider trading nearly impossible &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47829764&quot; title=&quot;Given the scope of all government officials it should just be the case that you cannot trade individual equities, stocks or have any outside investments wholesale. Otherwise how could you stop it? It’s not like when you work at big co and you just stop trading their stock. You get access to information that clearly will be material potentially months in advance.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate the specific culpability of the Trump administration versus other figures like Nancy Pelosi &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47829811&quot; title=&quot;What does that have to do with the Trump admin?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47829901&quot; title=&quot;Pelosi got a free Presidential jet and scooped the inside trades on Iran? Trump set a stratosphereic high bar for examples par excellence, I doubt all of Pelosi&amp;#39;s husband trades add up to a signifigant fraction of Trump&amp;#39;s crypto gains alone.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47829985&quot; title=&quot;You can actually buy an iOS app that mimicks Nancy Pelosi stock picks! Top that!&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, there is a broader frustration with the perceived &amp;#34;performance of neutrality&amp;#34; in journalism when reporting on potential political criminality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47830056&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Some analysts say it bears the hallmarks of illegal insider trading, whereby bets are made by people based on information that is not available to the general public.  &amp;gt; Others say the picture is more complicated and that some traders have become more adept at anticipating the president&amp;#39;s interventions. This and the title are journalistic malpractice. This is an article designed to report on obvious insider trading, and the writer clearly knows and agrees that it&amp;#39;s obvious, but goes out of…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Some participants anticipate future reforms to curb executive power, such as eliminating the presidential pardon or stripping back the authority of the office to ensure legal consequences &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47829780&quot; title=&quot;Why does making this rule matter? The pardon makes it all irrelevant.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47829787&quot; title=&quot;My hot take is that the presidential pardon will be eliminated in our lifetime.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47829853&quot; title=&quot;I suspect in the aftermath of this administration, the power of the President as a whole is going to be massively stripped back.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://vivianvoss.net/blog/why-we-accepted-surveillance&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;We accepted surveillance as default&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (vivianvoss.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47836730&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;300 points · 131 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://vivianvoss.net/blog/why-we-accepted-surveillance&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a consensus that surveillance is deeply entrenched in the web&amp;#39;s advertising-based business model &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47837589&quot; title=&quot;This is all well and good but as long as advertising is how folks make money on the web, the surveillance state will persist.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47838059&quot; title=&quot;The free internet of the workers and peasants? I mean, how will the websites make money?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, with some arguing that companies will continue to track users even if they pay for services &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47838370&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;ll still surveil even if you pay for the product. Why wouldn&amp;#39;t they? It&amp;#39;s an  additional income stream.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While Apple’s App Tracking Transparency is praised for its simplicity compared to the &amp;#34;clicking gymnastics&amp;#34; of websites &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47837325&quot; title=&quot;When Apple first released App Tracking Transparency, I immediately used it to block the trackers and I have not even thought about it since because it is so simple and useful. What a contrast to modern websites which require all sorts of weird clicking gymnastics to disable similar tracking.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47837475&quot; title=&quot;We should pass laws that require the weird clicking gymnastics to opt-in to tracking. Instead of the default opt-in hidden in the terms and conditions nobody reads.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, some users question the actual effectiveness of personalized ads, noting that they often see scams or irrelevant retargeting despite extensive data collection &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47839976&quot; title=&quot;I know there is evidence like Apple ATT (iOS 14.5, April 2021). 15-25% opt-in.       -$10B Meta revenue in 2022 (CFO   David Wehner) But it sure looks to me like personalized ads are a paper tiger.  I mean it seems like 30% of the ads I see on Facebook and YouTube are just transparent scams that they could serve me without any profiling.  For instance for a week I have been in heavy rotation of an ad on Facebook which obviously looks like a crude attempt to imitate a notification in the Facebook…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, the debate centers on whether a privacy-focused internet is viable without a shift in how websites generate revenue or a change in consumer priorities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47837726&quot; title=&quot;At least the solution is obvious, even if the path to an ad-free web is not. And it&amp;#39;s a solution that also has the advantage of being a solid public good.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47838518&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Why wouldn&amp;#39;t they? It&amp;#39;s an additional income stream. If customers cared, the additional income from being someone who didn&amp;#39;t surveil could outstrip the income stream from surveilling.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47839679&quot; title=&quot;Why do they have to make money?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000sri7/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;M 7.4 earthquake – 100 km ENE of Miyako, Japan&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (earthquake.usgs.gov)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47832248&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;275 points · 129 comments · by Someone&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A magnitude 7.4 earthquake occurred offshore near Miyako, Japan, on April 20, 2026, at a depth of 35 km, resulting from thrust faulting at the plate boundary between the Pacific and North America plates. &lt;a href=&quot;https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000sri7/&quot; title=&quot;Title: M 7.4 - 100 km ENE of Miyako, Japan    URL Source: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000sri7/    Published Time: Sun, 19 Apr 2026 19:47:13 GMT    Markdown Content:  # M 7.4 - 100 km ENE of Miyako, Japan    ![Image 1](https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/assets/img/us_flag_small.png)    An official website of the United States government    Here’s how you know    Here’s how you know    ![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users highlighted the NERV app, which provides early earthquake warnings and countdowns, with one user reporting a 45-second lead time before feeling the tremors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833068&quot; title=&quot;Felt it all the way in Tokyo! There is this amazing app called NERV that, whenever there is a large earthquake anywhere in Japan, sends you an early warning push notification and an animated display with shockwaves emanating from the epicenter, plus a countdown timer for the first wave hitting you. The first it went off for me it felt like something out of sci-fi. I think I got 45 seconds this time before my apartment started shaking. https://nerv.app/en/&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833265&quot; title=&quot;45 seconds is an incredible accomplishment. That’s a decent amount of heads up to get safer place. Obviously nerve wracking but great progress in alerts&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The app is notable for its official partnership with the *Evangelion* anime franchise, a branding choice that sparked debate over whether the series is a cultural masterpiece or &amp;#34;overrated&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833417&quot; title=&quot;It is straight up the same NERV, so it might. From the site: &amp;gt; The name and logo of &amp;#39;NERV&amp;#39; are used with the explicit permission of khara Inc., the copyright holder of the &amp;#39;Evangelion&amp;#39; series, and Groundworks Corporation, which manages the rights to the series.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833570&quot; title=&quot;This is just the best. A very serious company, doing seriously cool and important stuff, also has an anime name/icon. I wish more corps took themselves so lightly, while remaining serious about what they do.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47834441&quot; title=&quot;Evangelion is so mega overrated of an anime im experiencing second hand embarrassment on behalf of Japan for letting its national personaification be exlempified by shinji.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47835007&quot; title=&quot;it is a masterpiece, up there with ghost in the shell, akira, and serial experiments lain in terms of &amp;#39;japanese existentialist scifi&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While long-time residents noted the effectiveness of synchronized cellphone alerts, others shared anecdotes of the alarm&amp;#39;s startling effect on newcomers experiencing their first earthquake &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47833068&quot; title=&quot;Felt it all the way in Tokyo! There is this amazing app called NERV that, whenever there is a large earthquake anywhere in Japan, sends you an early warning push notification and an animated display with shockwaves emanating from the epicenter, plus a countdown timer for the first wave hitting you. The first it went off for me it felt like something out of sci-fi. I think I got 45 seconds this time before my apartment started shaking. https://nerv.app/en/&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47832971&quot; title=&quot;I live in Aomori (Northernmost prefecture of Honshu) and we got the warning before the earthquake arrived by all the cellphones in the office going crazy at the same time. It was kind of funny, because we have a lot of new guys here who have never been to Japan before and it was their first earthquake ever xD&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.adweek.com/media/exclusive-leaked-deck-reveals-stackadapts-playbook-for-chatgpt-ads/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OpenAI ad partner now selling ChatGPT ad placements based on “prompt relevance”&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (adweek.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47840980&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;244 points · 121 comments · by jlark77777&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Leaked documents reveal that ad platform StackAdapt has partnered with OpenAI to pilot ChatGPT ad placements, targeting users based on prompt relevance with a $50,000 minimum spend and CPMs ranging from $15 to $60. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.adweek.com/media/exclusive-leaked-deck-reveals-stackadapts-playbook-for-chatgpt-ads/&quot; title=&quot;Title: EXCLUSIVE: Leaked Deck Reveals StackAdapt’s Playbook for ChatGPT Ads    URL Source: https://www.adweek.com/media/exclusive-leaked-deck-reveals-stackadapts-playbook-for-chatgpt-ads/    Published Time: 2026-04-20T15:25:55-04:00    Markdown Content:  # EXCLUSIVE: Leaked Deck Reveals StackAdapt’s Playbook for ChatGPT Ads    [](https://www.adweek.com/)    [ADWEEK ALERT: Brandweek Sep 15-17 | ATL](https://event.adweek.com/brandweek_2026/?ref=alertp1)[**REGISTER NOW:**Brandweek is back in Atlanta,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The introduction of ad placements based on prompt relevance has sparked concerns regarding potential securities fraud and a reversal of previous privacy commitments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47841399&quot; title=&quot;Didn&amp;#39;t they explicitly say the ads wouldn&amp;#39;t be made aware of prompt data when they announced them? And if so, how is that not securities fraud?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47843006&quot; title=&quot;In what way would that be securities fraud? I guess you could get nailed under Section 17(a), but really hard to make a case they&amp;#39;re defrauding investors by representing they were going to make ads worse performing than they ended up making them. In order for it to be securities fraud it has to be tied to a securities transaction and the misstatement has to be material to a reasonable investor&amp;#39;s decision.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters anticipate a &amp;#34;race to the bottom&amp;#34; where chatbots prioritize sponsored recommendations over objective advice, potentially using long-term psychological manipulation to build trust before peddling products &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47842254&quot; title=&quot;How I imagine the Nash equilibrium in chatbot ads, driven by profit-seeking in a race to the bottom: User: &amp;#39;What&amp;#39;s the best way to fix this problem I have?&amp;#39; Chatbot: &amp;#39;I recommend buying this shiny thing here.&amp;#39; (Next to it, there&amp;#39;s a near-invisible light-gray &amp;#39;ad&amp;#39; notice.) Let&amp;#39;s hope I&amp;#39;m wrong.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47841935&quot; title=&quot;Feels like this is a baby step in what to come. We know that one of the best advertisement is word of mouth / recommendations from friend. I can easily imagine a direction where ChatGPT or the chat bots to spend an incredibly long time with the user to establish trust first. It will start to take in to account how much trust &amp;amp; thinking you&amp;#39;ve outsourced to it, and when it is certain of it, it will start to increase the advertisement messages slowly but surely. Efficiency of this methodology…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view the use of third-party partners as an inefficient &amp;#34;bootstrap&amp;#34; phase for a future in-house ad platform &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47841590&quot; title=&quot;The most surprising thing to me is that they&amp;#39;re partnering with third parties to do this. Less secure, lower margins (more middlemen taking fees), harder to access, more likely to not work properly. I would expect all the meta execs they&amp;#39;ve hired to know better so maybe I&amp;#39;m missing something...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47842940&quot; title=&quot;This approach makes a lot of sense. Advertising is a marketplace and this is a great way to bootstrap advertising inventory.  Its inevitable they will allow advertisers to manage ad spend directly through OpenAI but right now the product is too new to capture meaningful ad budget.  This way they can begin testing delivery and develop proof points around ROI and build towards larger ad spend directly.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others see this as an inevitable decline similar to Google’s evolution from a non-profit-oriented startup to an advertising giant &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47842416&quot; title=&quot;Look at Google in 2000s. If you travel back in time you would’ve never thought Google would do something like it is doing today.   Now pretend you travelled back in time to 2026. You would’ve never thought OpenAI (open source non profit company) would do something crazy that it just did in 2030 or 2040 or where you came from.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-04-19</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-04-19</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/vercel-confirms-breach-as-hackers-claim-to-be-selling-stolen-data/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Vercel April 2026 security incident&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bleepingcomputer.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824463&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;658 points · 375 comments · by colesantiago&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Vercel has confirmed a security breach following claims by hackers that they are selling stolen data, though the company is still investigating the full scope of the incident. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/vercel-confirms-breach-as-hackers-claim-to-be-selling-stolen-data/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;vercel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;kb&amp;amp;#x2F;bulletin&amp;amp;#x2F;vercel-april-2026-security-incident&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;vercel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;kb&amp;amp;#x2F;bulletin&amp;amp;#x2F;vercel-april-2026-security-in...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Vercel security incident originated from a compromised third-party AI tool, Context.ai, which allowed attackers to escalate access through a Vercel employee&amp;#39;s Google Workspace account &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47826825&quot; title=&quot;They just added more details: &amp;gt; Indicators of compromise (IOCs) &amp;gt; Our investigation has revealed that the incident originated from a third-party AI tool whose Google Workspace OAuth app was the subject of a broader compromise, potentially affecting hundreds of its users across many organizations. &amp;gt; We are publishing the following IOC to support the wider community in the investigation and vetting of potential malicious activity in their environments. We recommend that Google Workspace…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47828551&quot; title=&quot;https://x.com/rauchg/status/2045995362499076169 &amp;gt; A Vercel employee got compromised via the breach of an AI platform customer called http://Context.ai that he was using. &amp;gt; Through a series of maneuvers that escalated from our colleague’s compromised Vercel Google Workspace account, the attacker got further access to Vercel environments. &amp;gt; We do have a capability however to designate environment variables as “non-sensitive”. Unfortunately, the attacker got further access through their…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Users criticized Vercel’s initial communication as &amp;#34;intentionally vague&amp;#34; and lacking actionable advice, such as the immediate rotation of all sensitive credentials &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825592&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been part of a response team on a security incident and I really feel for them. However, this initial communication is terrible. Something happened, we won&amp;#39;t say what, but it was severe enough to notify law enforcement. What floors me is the only actionable advice is to &amp;#39;review environment variables&amp;#39;. What should a customer even do with that advice? Make sure the variable are still there? How would you know if any of them were exposed or leaked? The advice should be to IMMEDIATELY rotate…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47828551&quot; title=&quot;https://x.com/rauchg/status/2045995362499076169 &amp;gt; A Vercel employee got compromised via the breach of an AI platform customer called http://Context.ai that he was using. &amp;gt; Through a series of maneuvers that escalated from our colleague’s compromised Vercel Google Workspace account, the attacker got further access to Vercel environments. &amp;gt; We do have a capability however to designate environment variables as “non-sensitive”. Unfortunately, the attacker got further access through their…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion highlights a growing consensus that the modern web&amp;#39;s reliance on interconnected third-party services and AI agents has created a dangerously large attack surface &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47826114&quot; title=&quot;Claude Code defaulting to a certain set of recommended providers[0] and frameworks is making the web more homogenous and that lack of diversity is increasing the blast radius of incidents [0] https://amplifying.ai/research/claude-code-picks/report&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47827199&quot; title=&quot;Idk exactly how to articulate my thoughts here, perhaps someone can chime in and help. This feels like a natural consequence of the direction web development has been going for the last decade, where it&amp;#39;s normalised to wire up many third party solutions together rather than building from more stable foundations. So many moving parts, so many potential points of failure, and as this incident has shown, you are only as secure as your weakest link. Putting your business in the hands of a third…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824935&quot; title=&quot;Much as I want to rip on vercel, its clear that ai is going to lead to mass security breaches. The attack surface is so large, and ai agents are working around the clock. This is a new normal. Open source software is going to change, companies wont be running random repos off github anymore&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this vulnerability could affect any host, others suggest it is a consequence of &amp;#34;vibe-coded&amp;#34; development practices and the extreme application of the Unix philosophy to hosting models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824782&quot; title=&quot;https://x.com/theo/status/2045871215705747965 - &amp;#39;Everything I know about this hack suggests it could happen to any host&amp;#39; He also suggests in another post that Linear and GitHub could also be pwned? Either way, hugops to all the SRE/DevOps out there, seems like it&amp;#39;s going to be a busy Sunday for many.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47827199&quot; title=&quot;Idk exactly how to articulate my thoughts here, perhaps someone can chime in and help. This feels like a natural consequence of the direction web development has been going for the last decade, where it&amp;#39;s normalised to wire up many third party solutions together rather than building from more stable foundations. So many moving parts, so many potential points of failure, and as this incident has shown, you are only as secure as your weakest link. Putting your business in the hands of a third…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47827230&quot; title=&quot;This isn&amp;#39;t a web development concept. It&amp;#39;s the unix philosophy of &amp;#39;write programs that do one thing and do it well&amp;#39; and interconnect them, being taken to the extremes that were never intended. We need a different hosting model.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47826238&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s interesting how many of the low-effort vibecoded projects I see posted on reddit are on vercel.  It&amp;#39;s basically the default.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/914672/the-ram-shortage-could-last-years&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The RAM shortage could last years&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theverge.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822414&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;251 points · &lt;strong&gt;284 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by omer_k&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A global RAM shortage driven by AI data center demand is expected to last through 2027, with manufacturers likely meeting only 60 percent of demand and prioritizing high-bandwidth memory over consumer electronics. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/914672/the-ram-shortage-could-last-years&quot; title=&quot;Title: The RAM shortage could last years    URL Source: https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/914672/the-ram-shortage-could-last-years    Published Time: 2026-04-18T21:08:45+00:00    Markdown Content:  # The RAM shortage could last years | The Verge    [Skip to main content](https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/914672/the-ram-shortage-could-last-years#content)    [The…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current RAM shortage is driven by manufacturers prioritizing High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) for AI over standard DRAM, leading some to fear that a potential AI market correction could leave suppliers &amp;#34;holding the bag&amp;#34; as they have in previous cycles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822732&quot; title=&quot;Ok so Samsung, SK Hynix and Micron do not have the capacity to meet demand. Also, what little capacity they do have they are allocating to HBM over DRAM. Based on my limited knowledge HBM can not be easily repurposed for consumer electronics. Translation: main street is cooked for the next 3-4 years. It doesn&amp;#39;t stop there though. OpenAI is currently mired in a capital crunch. Their last round just about sucked all the dry powder out of the private markets. Folks are now starting to ask…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47827478&quot; title=&quot;Don’t the memory makers always get left holding the bag? I feel this has happened at least three times before.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47828609&quot; title=&quot;All of the capital intensive businesses face this issue. Chemicals, Shipping, Semiconductors etc. You get market signals that the demand is there, you acquire the necessary capital, you spend 5 years to build capacity, but guess what, 5 other market players did the same thing. So now you are doomed, because the market is flooded and you have low cash flow since you need to drop prices to compete for pennies. Now you cannot find capital, you don&amp;#39;t invest, but guess what, neither your competitors…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users hope this scarcity will finally force developers to abandon resource-heavy frameworks like Electron in favor of memory-efficient optimization &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47827700&quot; title=&quot;I’m a bit of an optimist. I think this will smack the hands of developers who don’t manage RAM well and future apps will necessarily be more memory-efficient.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47828179&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I think this will smack the hands of developers who don’t manage RAM well And hopefully kill Electron. I have never seen the point of spinning up a 300+Mb app just to display something that ought to need only 500Kb to paint onto the screen.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822639&quot; title=&quot;The era of optimisation is finally here. I&amp;#39;m excited.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that reducing RAM usage often necessitates a costly increase in CPU overhead &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47827836&quot; title=&quot;Using a lot less RAM often implies using more CPU, so even with inflated RAM prices, it&amp;#39;s not a good tradeoff (at least not in general).&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, infrastructure hurdles like power grid limitations in the Netherlands may further complicate the timeline for data center expansions that are currently driving this demand &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822993&quot; title=&quot;To add a more local hurdle as well, the Dutch power grid is at capacity and its managing company is now telling companies that planned to build a datacenter that they can&amp;#39;t be connected to the grid until 2030, even though said companies already paid for and got guarantees about that connection. That is, memory capacity is reserved for datacenters yet to be built, but this will do weird things if said datacenter construction is postponed or cancelled altogether.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/weezerOSINT/status/2045849358462222720&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Notion leaks email addresses of all editors of any public page&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824945&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;352 points · 126 comments · by Tiberium&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A security researcher reports that public Notion pages are leaking the full names, email addresses, and profile photos of all editors via a simple unauthenticated request, a vulnerability allegedly known since 2022 that remains active in 2026. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/weezerOSINT/status/2045849358462222720&quot; title=&quot;Title: impulsive on X: &amp;#39;every public Notion page is leaking the email addresses of everyone who edited it.    zero authentication. no cookies. no tokens. one POST request returns full names, emails, and profile photos for every editor on the page.    your company wiki is public? every employee&amp;#39;s email is https://t.co/jqWSCVBoyH&amp;#39; / X    URL Source: https://twitter.com/weezerOSINT/status/2045849358462222720    Published Time: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 05:51:47 GMT    Markdown Content:  # impulsive on X: &amp;#39;every…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Notion’s exposure of editor email addresses on public pages has sparked criticism because the behavior was officially documented and &amp;#34;by design&amp;#34; rather than a traditional bug &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825813&quot; title=&quot;Apparently this is officially documented at https://www.notion.com/help/public-pages-and-web-publishing#... buried in a note: &amp;gt; When you publish a Notion page to the web, the webpage’s metadata may include the names, profile photos, and email addresses associated with any Notion users that have contributed to the page.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47826115&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s just ... absurd. The flaw itself is absurd but then just accepting it as &amp;#39;by design&amp;#39; makes it even worse.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While a Notion representative stated they are exploring fixes like email proxying, they noted that a solution is more complex than a &amp;#34;one minute fix&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47827283&quot; title=&quot;Hi, this is Max from Notion. First: This is documented and we also warn users when they publish a page. But, that’s not good enough! Second: We don’t like this and are looking at ways to fix this either by removing the PII from the public endpoints or by replacing it with an email proxy similar to GitHub’s equivalent functionality for public commits. P.S: Some folks here have speculated that this should be a 1 minute fix. Unfortunately that is not the case. :(&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Users expressed frustration over the lack of corporate accountability for privacy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825436&quot; title=&quot;Big companys need to start caring more security and privacy of its users and employees&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825497&quot; title=&quot;The problem is that they don&amp;#39;t &amp;#39;need&amp;#39; to. There&amp;#39;s no consequences for not caring, and no incentive to care. We need laws and a competent government to force these companies to care by levying significant fines or jail time for executives depending on severity. Not fines like 0.00002 cents per exposed customers, existential fines like 1% of annual revinue for each exposed customer. If you fuck up bad enough, your company burns to the ground and your CEO goes to jail type consequences.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, with some sharing anecdotes of being deanonymized by this specific issue as far back as five years ago &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825768&quot; title=&quot;It has been an issue for at least 5 years. I remember one dude from HN deanonymized me around 5 years ago by looking at my notion page.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://madhadron.com/programming/seven_ur_languages.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The seven programming ur-languages (2022)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (madhadron.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822486&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;322 points · 125 comments · by helloplanets&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author identifies seven &amp;#34;ur-languages&amp;#34;—ALGOL, Lisp, ML, Self, Forth, APL, and Prolog—as the fundamental archetypes of programming, arguing that mastering one language from each distinct family builds essential mental frameworks that transcend the similarities of common modern languages. &lt;a href=&quot;https://madhadron.com/programming/seven_ur_languages.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: madhadron  - The seven programming ur-languages    URL Source: https://madhadron.com/programming/seven_ur_languages.html    Published Time: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 03:00:03 GMT    Markdown Content:  # madhadron - The seven programming ur-languages    # madhadron    *   [Home](https://madhadron.com/index.html)  *   [Programming](https://madhadron.com/programming/index.html)  *   [Science](https://madhadron.com/science/index.html)    « Back to [Programming](https://madhadron.com/programming/index.html) |…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters suggest expanding the article&amp;#39;s taxonomy to include languages focused on formal proofs and the Curry-Howard correspondence, such as Lean or Agda &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823854&quot; title=&quot;I might add another class of languages: those intended to express proofs, via the Curry-Howard correspondence.   Lean is a primary example here.  This could be considered a subclass of functional languages but it might be different enough to warrant a separate class.  In particular, the purpose of these programs is to be checked; execution is only secondary.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824066&quot; title=&quot;Theorem proving and complex types are like extensions on an otherwise ordinary language: - Agda, Idris, etc. are functional languages extended with complex types - Isabelle, Lean, etc. are functional languages extended with complex types and unreadable interactive proofs - Dafny etc. are imperative languages extended with theorems and hints - ACL2 is a LISP with theorems and hints Related, typeclasses are effectively logic programming on an otherwise functional/imperative language (like traits…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue these are functional languages with complex type extensions, others contend they represent a distinct class because they must restrict general recursion to remain suitable for theorem proving &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824066&quot; title=&quot;Theorem proving and complex types are like extensions on an otherwise ordinary language: - Agda, Idris, etc. are functional languages extended with complex types - Isabelle, Lean, etc. are functional languages extended with complex types and unreadable interactive proofs - Dafny etc. are imperative languages extended with theorems and hints - ACL2 is a LISP with theorems and hints Related, typeclasses are effectively logic programming on an otherwise functional/imperative language (like traits…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824169&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Agda, Idris, etc. are functional languages extended with complex types I think they are not. No amount of type level extensions can turn a regular functional language like Haskell into something suitable for theorem proving. Adding dependent types to Haskell, for example, doesn&amp;#39;t suffice. To build a theorem prover you need to take away some capability (namely, the ability to do general recursion - the base language must be total and can&amp;#39;t be Turing complete), not add new capabilities. In…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also debate regarding the &amp;#34;Algol&amp;#34; classification: some argue Ruby should be categorized as a pure object-oriented language inspired by Smalltalk rather than an Algol derivative &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824155&quot; title=&quot;One correction I&amp;#39;d make to the article&amp;#39;s taxonomy: Ruby is an object oriented language not an Algol. Its inspiration is Smalltalk, and much of the standard library naming comes from that route (eg collect rather than map). Ruby is object oriented from the ground up. Everything (and I do mean everything) is an object, and method call is conceived as passing messages to objects. While Ruby is most often compared to Python (an Algol), they come from very different evolutionary routes, and have…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, while others note that even Python has evolved into a pure OOP language where all primitive types are objects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825797&quot; title=&quot;Since Python introduced new style classes, it also became a pure OOP language, even though it might not look like it at &amp;#39;Hello World&amp;#39; level, all primitive types have become objects as well. I love to point this out to OOP haters, &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; type(42) &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; dir(42)      [&amp;#39;__abs__&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;__add__&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;__and__&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;__bool__&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;__ceil__&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;__class__&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;__delattr__&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;__dir__&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;__divmod__&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;__doc__&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;__eq__&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;__float__&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;__floor__&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;__floordiv__&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;__format__&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;__ge__&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;__getattribute__&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;__getnewargs__&amp;#39;,…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Additional proposed &amp;#34;ur-languages&amp;#34; or semantic families include Verilog, SNOBOL, and various parallel or non-von Neumann models like Kahn process networks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823880&quot; title=&quot;there&amp;#39;s a few more semantic families: verilog, petri nets and variants, Kahn process networks and dataflow machines, process calculi, reactive, term rewriting, constraint solvers/theorem provers (not the same with Prolog), probabilistic programming, plus up and coming (actual production-ready) languages that don&amp;#39;t fit perfectly in the 7 categories: unison, darklang, temporal dataflow, DBSP It may feel like a little bit of cheating mentioning the above ones, as most are parallel to the regular…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824197&quot; title=&quot;I wrote something similar here: https://fmjlang.co.uk/blog/GroundBreakingLanguages.html We agree on Algol, Lisp, Forth, APL, and Prolog.   For ground-breaking functional language, I have SASL (St Andrews Static Language), which (just) predates ML, and for object oriented language, I have Smalltalk (which predates Self). I also include Fortran, COBOL, SNOBOL (string processing), and Prograph (visual dataflow), which were similarly ground-breaking in different ways.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/dubai-police-spied-private-whatsapp-5HjdXwr_2/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Airline worker arrested after sharing photos of bomb damage in WhatsApp group&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lbc.co.uk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824068&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;263 points · 171 comments · by aa_is_op&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dubai police arrested an airline worker after using electronic surveillance to access a private WhatsApp group where he shared photos of bomb damage, charging him with publishing information harmful to state interests. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/dubai-police-spied-private-whatsapp-5HjdXwr_2/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Dubai police arrest airline worker after accessing private WhatsApp group    URL Source: https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/dubai-police-spied-private-whatsapp-5HjdXwr_2/    Published Time: 2026-04-17T23:26:27.263451+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Dubai police arrest airline worker after accessing private WhatsApp group | LBC    [Skip to main content](https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/dubai-police-spied-private-whatsapp-5HjdXwr_2/#skip-to-content)    [![Image 3: LBC…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The arrest of a UAE airline worker for sharing bomb damage photos has sparked debate over whether the move is primarily about avoiding public embarrassment or protecting national security &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824272&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; publishing information deemed harmful to state interests Is the charge, which I think kind of speaks for itself. Full on: &amp;#39;You embarrassed us, straight to jail.&amp;#39; In most of the world such photos would be deemed of public interest and shared by the media then we&amp;#39;d reflect on if our routing is safe/correct and make proportional changes for safety. Not a big deal, nobody is fired, life moves on. I feel like actions like this are going to hurt the UAE themselves, because how can you improve if…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825493&quot; title=&quot;The censorship is dual purpose. They want to make it so Iran doesn’t know if they successfully hit that Oracle data centre. But they also want to make it so foreign investors don’t get scared off by the prospect of their data centre getting blown up. Obviously investors will avoid the area so long as missiles are flying - but by coming through the conflict &amp;#39;unscathed&amp;#39; will let them bounce back fast. Likewise with tourism. Which of these is the bigger motivation? Hard to say. But I gather most…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the lack of open dialogue hinders societal improvement and safety &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824272&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; publishing information deemed harmful to state interests Is the charge, which I think kind of speaks for itself. Full on: &amp;#39;You embarrassed us, straight to jail.&amp;#39; In most of the world such photos would be deemed of public interest and shared by the media then we&amp;#39;d reflect on if our routing is safe/correct and make proportional changes for safety. Not a big deal, nobody is fired, life moves on. I feel like actions like this are going to hurt the UAE themselves, because how can you improve if…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824358&quot; title=&quot;how can you improve if there is no dialog The UAE doesn&amp;#39;t have a self-advancement culture, it&amp;#39;s a capital-backed monarchy that imports pretty much all of its research and production; in other words it piggy-backs on the knowledge produced in other societies. There is no advancement through dialog in the country itself.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that suppressing battle damage assessments is a standard military necessity to prevent enemies from refining their targeting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824491&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;re effectively at war and are freaking out about capital flight which poses a unique existential risk to them especially. I imagine most countries in that situation would clamp down on freedom of speech and prohibit sharing photos of missile strikes. This would include most of the ones that pay lip service to freedom of speech in peace time. Ukraine does this too.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824926&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Ukraine does it to avoid assisting Russian damage assessment and targeting efforts. Isn’t UAE doing this to avoid Iranian damage assessment and targeting efforts also?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824526&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;In most of the world such photos would be deemed of public interest and shared OTOH, anyone remember &amp;#39;loose lips sink ships?&amp;#39; Beyond the famous poster, it was backed up by robust censorship laws.[0][1] You might say it&amp;#39;s different since we were at war, but this ignores how the threat model and immediacy is very different in the UAE vs here in the (geographically well protected/isolated) US. Battle damage assessment, especially if it&amp;#39;s timely, is critical information in any conflict. This is…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Comparisons were drawn to Ukraine&amp;#39;s similar restrictions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824491&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;re effectively at war and are freaking out about capital flight which poses a unique existential risk to them especially. I imagine most countries in that situation would clamp down on freedom of speech and prohibit sharing photos of missile strikes. This would include most of the ones that pay lip service to freedom of speech in peace time. Ukraine does this too.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824608&quot; title=&quot;Ukraine does it to avoid assisting Russian damage assessment and targeting efforts.  Avoiding embarrassment is not really part of the equation, especially when they need to push for more international support.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, though critics suggest the UAE&amp;#39;s motivations are uniquely tied to protecting foreign investment and tourism by maintaining an image of stability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825493&quot; title=&quot;The censorship is dual purpose. They want to make it so Iran doesn’t know if they successfully hit that Oracle data centre. But they also want to make it so foreign investors don’t get scared off by the prospect of their data centre getting blown up. Obviously investors will avoid the area so long as missiles are flying - but by coming through the conflict &amp;#39;unscathed&amp;#39; will let them bounce back fast. Likewise with tourism. Which of these is the bigger motivation? Hard to say. But I gather most…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://simonwillison.net/2026/Apr/18/opus-system-prompt/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Changes in the system prompt between Claude Opus 4.6 and 4.7&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (simonwillison.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823270&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;269 points · 160 comments · by pretext&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The update from Claude Opus 4.6 to 4.7 introduces expanded child safety and disordered eating guidelines, new integrations like Claude in PowerPoint, and instructions for the model to be less verbose and more proactive in using tools to resolve user ambiguities. &lt;a href=&quot;https://simonwillison.net/2026/Apr/18/opus-system-prompt/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Changes in the system prompt between Claude Opus 4.6 and 4.7    URL Source: https://simonwillison.net/2026/Apr/18/opus-system-prompt/    Published Time: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 04:48:57 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Changes in the system prompt between Claude Opus 4.6 and 4.7    # [Simon Willison’s Weblog](https://simonwillison.net/)    [Subscribe](https://simonwillison.net/about/#subscribe)    **Sponsored by:** Honeycomb — AI agents behave unpredictably. Get the context you need to debug what actually…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The latest Claude system prompt has ballooned to approximately 80,000 tokens, leading users to question the efficiency and cost of using massive prompts instead of fine-tuning weights &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823855&quot; title=&quot;I knew these system prompts were getting big, but holy fuck. More than 60,000 words. With the 3/4 words per token rule of thumb, that&amp;#39;s ~80k tokens. Even with 1M context window, that is approaching 10% and you haven&amp;#39;t even had any user input yet. And it gets churned by every single request they receive. No wonder their infra costs keep ballooning. And most of it seems to be stable between claude version iterations too. Why wouldn&amp;#39;t they try to bake this into the weights during training? Sure…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47828185&quot; title=&quot;The problem is that this is an incredibly niche / small issue (i.e. &amp;lt;&amp;lt;1% of users, let alone prompts, need this clarification), and if you add a section for every single small thing like this, you end up with a massively bloated prompt. Notice that every single user of Claude is paying for this paragraph now! This single paragraph is going to legitimately cost anthropic at least 4, maybe 5 digits. At some point you just have to accept that llm&amp;#39;s, like people, make mistakes, and that&amp;#39;s ok!&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see the inclusion of specific safety guidelines—such as those regarding eating disorders—as a common-sense legal and ethical necessity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824327&quot; title=&quot;When you are worth hundreds of billions, people start falling over themselves running to file lawsuits against you. We&amp;#39;re already seeing this happen. So spending $50M to fund a team to weed out &amp;#39;food for crazies&amp;#39; becomes a no-brainer.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47828038&quot; title=&quot;That part of the system prompt is just stating that telling someone who has an actual eating disorder to start counting calories or micro-manage their eating in other ways (a suggestion that the model might well give to an average person for the sake of clear argument, which would then be understood sensibly and taken with a grain of salt) is likely to make them worse off, not better off.  This seems like a common-sense addition. It should not trigger any excess refusals on its own.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47827726&quot; title=&quot;It is a no brainer. If a company of any size is putting out a product that caused cancer we wouldn&amp;#39;t think twice about suing them. Why should mental health disorders be any different?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue this &amp;#34;bloat&amp;#34; creates a slippery slope of niche restrictions that increase latency for all users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824042&quot; title=&quot;The eating disorder section is kind of crazy. Are we going to incrementally add sections for every &amp;#39;bad&amp;#39; human behaviour as time goes on?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47828185&quot; title=&quot;The problem is that this is an incredibly niche / small issue (i.e. &amp;lt;&amp;lt;1% of users, let alone prompts, need this clarification), and if you add a section for every single small thing like this, you end up with a massively bloated prompt. Notice that every single user of Claude is paying for this paragraph now! This single paragraph is going to legitimately cost anthropic at least 4, maybe 5 digits. At some point you just have to accept that llm&amp;#39;s, like people, make mistakes, and that&amp;#39;s ok!&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, technical concerns have emerged regarding &amp;#34;malware paranoia&amp;#34; that disrupts legitimate coding tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823597&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m curious as to why 4.7 seems obsessed with avoiding any actions that could help the user create or enhance malware. The system prompts seem similar on the matter, so I wonder if this is an early attempt by Anthropic to use steering vector injection? The malware paranoia is so strong that my company has had to temporarily block use of 4.7 on our IDE of choice, as the model was behaving in a concerningly unaligned way, as well as spending large amounts of token budget contemplating whether any…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, and a new directive for Claude to guess unspecified details rather than asking for clarification, which some users find counterintuitive to natural collaboration &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823663&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The new section includes:  When a request leaves minor details unspecified, the person typically wants Claude to make a reasonable attempt now, not to be interviewed first. Uff, I&amp;#39;ve tried stuff like these in my prompts, and the results are never good, I much prefer the agent to prompt me upfront to resolve that before it &amp;#39;attempts&amp;#39; whatever it wants, kind of surprised to see that they added that&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824168&quot; title=&quot;Seriously, when you&amp;#39;re conversing with a person would you prefer they start rambling on their own interpretation or would you prefer they ask you to clarify? The latter seems pretty natural and obvious. Edit: That said, it&amp;#39;s entirely possible that large and sophisticated LLMs can invent some pretty bizarre but technically possible interpretations, so maybe this is to curb that tendency.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822940&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ask HN: How did you land your first projects as a solo engineer/consultant?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822940&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;255 points · 117 comments · by modelcroissant&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A software engineer transitioning into solo consultancy is seeking advice on how to acquire initial clients for a business focused on streamlining internal workflows and technical operations for small-to-medium enterprises. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822940&quot; title=&quot;I’ve spent roughly the last decade and some change as a software engineer, and recently decided to start a solo consultancy.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;I’m focused on helping SMEs sort out the messy back-office parts of the business: spreadsheet glue, brittle internal workflows, poor reporting, awkward integrations, backend&amp;amp;#x2F;platform problems, and AI workflows that need to do real work rather than just look good in a demo.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;I’m not really interested in becoming a generic agency. I’d rather work with businesses…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To land projects as a solo consultant, the prevailing consensus is to differentiate through extreme specialization rather than general software engineering &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823228&quot; title=&quot;General consultancy is an extremely crowded space. As a startup CEO, I get at least 3 emails per week from software agencies and consultants. On top of that, they&amp;#39;re usually located in India/Ukraine and the rates they offer are very low, so I assume it&amp;#39;s very difficult to compete. My advice would be to differentiate yourself: - Become an expert in 1 thing, and one thing only: either start an open source project, or become the main collaborator in one. And be an EXPERT in that ONE thing. Not a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824201&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Become an expert in 1 thing I endorse this. I&amp;#39;ve been doing generalist consulting for about six years, and I love flying solo. I&amp;#39;ve been successful in landing some big customers and interesting projects, but I&amp;#39;m tired of the inefficiency that comes with being a generalist, so I&amp;#39;ve decided to specialize vertically. I had a super-interesting project in executive search in the last couple years, and I&amp;#39;ve decided to settle around that area: executive search and recruitment firms. Maybe later, as…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that niche expertise narrows the market or faces competition from AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823587&quot; title=&quot;Becoming an expert in one thing also narrows down the potential suitable work tremendously. Also these days nobody wants to pay the expert prices since.. Claude can so the expert stuff with a non-expert (at least in their mind)&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, proponents suggest that vertical specialization (e.g., focusing on recruitment firms or specific ecosystems like Salesforce) creates commercial and operational efficiencies that generalists lack &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824201&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Become an expert in 1 thing I endorse this. I&amp;#39;ve been doing generalist consulting for about six years, and I love flying solo. I&amp;#39;ve been successful in landing some big customers and interesting projects, but I&amp;#39;m tired of the inefficiency that comes with being a generalist, so I&amp;#39;ve decided to specialize vertically. I had a super-interesting project in executive search in the last couple years, and I&amp;#39;ve decided to settle around that area: executive search and recruitment firms. Maybe later, as…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47827323&quot; title=&quot;If you&amp;#39;re a dev, one approach to specialization is to align with the tooling associated with common &amp;#39;profit center&amp;#39; processes. Become a Salesforce/Hubspot/Odoo/Shopify developer. If you&amp;#39;re not interested in developing, you can specialize in learning one specific ecosystem really well and then teach companies -- typically SMBs -- how to set themselves up and organize their operations around it.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond expertise, success often stems from &amp;#34;being nice on the internet&amp;#34; by providing free value in Slack or Facebook communities, which builds the trust necessary to convert connections into long-term clients &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823388&quot; title=&quot;I was hanging out on a slack community of developers where I would commonly respond to questions and chat on the channel for Python.  Someone there had a friend with AWS costs flying through the roof and he needed some help from somebody who could understand python. My action on that channel caused him to reach out to me. Once I solved their issue, they asked me if I could add features to the site. I turned them down and told them they would be better off rewriting it from scratch, which they…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823593&quot; title=&quot;Your story is a nice succinct version of the &amp;#39;Business of Authority&amp;#39; strategy. Establish yourself as an expert, work finds you. https://thebusinessofauthority.com/&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theverge.com/tech/913765/adobe-rivals-free-creative-software-app-updates&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The creative software industry has declared war on Adobe&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theverge.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824403&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;207 points · 157 comments · by tambourine_man&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Creative software rivals like Maxon and Canva are challenging Adobe’s industry dominance by offering free access to motion design and VFX tools like Autograph and Cavalry. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theverge.com/tech/913765/adobe-rivals-free-creative-software-app-updates&quot; title=&quot;Title: The creative software industry has declared war on Adobe    URL Source: https://www.theverge.com/tech/913765/adobe-rivals-free-creative-software-app-updates    Published Time: 2026-04-17T12:51:16+00:00    Markdown Content:  # The creative software industry has declared war on Adobe | The Verge    [Skip to main content](https://www.theverge.com/tech/913765/adobe-rivals-free-creative-software-app-updates#content)    [The…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate over Adobe’s dominance centers on a trade-off between professional efficiency and predatory pricing models. Proponents argue that Adobe’s advanced masking and batch-processing tools provide a workflow speed that justifies the $120/year cost, saving hours of labor compared to cheaper alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825055&quot; title=&quot;We all love to hate on Adobe. But as a photographer my primary software tool is Lightroom. And I continue to use it despite its $120/year price and less-than-stellar cataloging subsystem because its photo editing features (it&amp;#39;s primary mission) still exceed the capabilities of its competitors. I don&amp;#39;t see anyone else here talking about the huge strides that Adobe has taken in the past few years with their masking tools in particular. Adobe is still the leader at least in this segment because…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825754&quot; title=&quot;no one is insisting there are can only be one or two products per category. Rahter, at some point in your life, $120 a year is not that much. It&amp;#39;s $10 a month, that&amp;#39;s two coffees, A MONTH! I bought Affinity Photo at one point, when it was $50. Then I tried to use it for a work project where I needed to do a minor edit to 150 photos. I figured out how to do it but it&amp;#39;s workflow was tedious. At 3 mins per photo it would have taken me 7.5 hours. I paid Adobe the $120 and got it done in 1.5hrs.…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, many users criticize the shift to subscriptions as a &amp;#34;dark pattern&amp;#34; that exploits hobbyists and students who previously relied on perpetual licenses or steep discounts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824995&quot; title=&quot;I bought CS6 Suite back in 2012 and used it well into 2021. Before that I had a patchwork of CS3 programs from 2005 I was given the discs for second-hand. Nowadays I use Krita, ffmpeg, Blender, Zim Desktop Wiki, and Inkscape to replace Flash/Animator, Photoshop, Premier, Dreamweaver, and Fireworks. CS6 cost me $549 back in 2012 under a pretty generous student discount, but would&amp;#39;ve been $1,800 otherwise. That&amp;#39;s $790 and $2,500 adjusted for inflation if you still trust the BLS&amp;#39; CPI calculations.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825284&quot; title=&quot;For regular, undiscounted prices the subscription prices were somewhat fair. Regular Photoshop CS5 was $700, or $1000 for the extended version. And $200 to upgrade. Now it&amp;#39;s a $300/year subscription. But students really got shafted. You used to get 80-90% student discounts, and could keep using the same version for years. Including keeping the software when you were no longer a student&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824748&quot; title=&quot;http://archive.today/WCDgq It’s so insidious to sell yearly subscriptions that you pay for monthly. I want to pay by the month precisely because I decide on a monthly basis whether I need a service. If you want out early with Adobe you have to cough up half of the remaining subscription time. For hobby photography do yourself a favor and skip this dark pattern peddler. I’ll pour one out for the pro’s.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some have successfully migrated to open-source or pay-once tools like Affinity and Darktable, others find the loss of interoperability and specialized features too high a hurdle for professional work &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824638&quot; title=&quot;Paywall. I assume everyone is tired of their subscription fee? I love Lightroom but it’s too expensive for my hobby use. I wish all the photo systems had better interoperability. I’m losing quite a bit as I migrate to Darktable.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825095&quot; title=&quot;Every time I see one of these HN threads, I am actually amazed with what Adobe was able to pull off. I&amp;#39;m not surprised that they could do this to pros who were used to a particular workflow. In fact, for some businesses, a subscription may have some benefits. You were probably upgrading regularly anyway, and the only downside is that it&amp;#39;s an expense you can&amp;#39;t cut back on in a lean year. But there are so many hobbyists , including here HN, who just went with it and have given Adobe thousands of…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825754&quot; title=&quot;no one is insisting there are can only be one or two products per category. Rahter, at some point in your life, $120 a year is not that much. It&amp;#39;s $10 a month, that&amp;#39;s two coffees, A MONTH! I bought Affinity Photo at one point, when it was $50. Then I tried to use it for a work project where I needed to do a minor edit to 150 photos. I figured out how to do it but it&amp;#39;s workflow was tedious. At 3 mins per photo it would have taken me 7.5 hours. I paid Adobe the $120 and got it done in 1.5hrs.…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://apenwarr.ca/log/20170810&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The world in which IPv6 was a good design (2017)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (apenwarr.ca)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47821429&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;217 points · 146 comments · by signa11&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article explores how IPv6 was intended to simplify networking by eliminating legacy &amp;#34;bus&amp;#34; concepts like MAC addresses and bridging, but failed to replace them because it didn&amp;#39;t solve mobile IP roaming, leaving the modern internet as a complex, layered mess of hardware-defined workarounds. &lt;a href=&quot;https://apenwarr.ca/log/20170810&quot; title=&quot;Title: The world in which IPv6 was a good design    URL Source: https://apenwarr.ca/log/20170810    Markdown Content:  # The world in which IPv6 was a good design - apenwarr     An    [![Image 1](https://apenwarr.ca/img/ave-home.jpg)](https://apenwarr.ca/)     a day keeps the doctor away     _Everything here is my opinion. I do not speak for your employer._    _← [August 2017](https://apenwarr.ca/log/?m=201708)_    _[September 2017](https://apenwarr.ca/log/?m=201709) →_    ## [2017-08-10…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some argue IPv6 is a solid design that lacks better alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825235&quot; title=&quot;Our world. It was a good design in our world. I don&amp;#39;t think v6 is the absolute pinnacle of protocol design, but whenever anybody says it&amp;#39;s bad and tries to come up with a better alternative, they end up coming up with something equivalent to IPv6. If people consistently can&amp;#39;t do better than v6, then I&amp;#39;d say v6 is probably pretty decent.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, critics contend its adoption was hampered by the IETF’s &amp;#34;religious&amp;#34; adherence to the end-to-end principle, which ignored the practical security and tooling needs of site maintainers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47826556&quot; title=&quot;Everyone forgets that the Internet Architecture Board took a religious view on &amp;#39;Internet transparency and the end-to-end principle&amp;#39; which was counter to the realities of limited tooling and actual site maintainers needs. [0] There were many of us who, even when it was still IPng (IP Next Generation) in the mid 1990&amp;#39;s, tried to get it working and spent significant amount of effort to do so, only to be hit with unrealistic ideological ideals that blocked our ability to deploy it, especially with…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47827875&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; AAAA records have lower priority than A records if you don&amp;#39;t have a v6 address assigned on your system. (Link-locals don&amp;#39;t count for this). There is an expired 6man draft that explains some of the issues here. https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-buraglio-6man-rfc6724-... To be clear, I go and clean out the temporary fixes for dual stack problems, but you want some more info so here it is. $ grep  &amp;#39;apt.systemd.daily&amp;#39; /var/log/syslog.1 |  grep &amp;#39;^2026-04-16T01:09&amp;#39; | wc -l       86375         $…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents of IPv4 suggest that NAT and reverse proxies are sufficient for modern needs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825496&quot; title=&quot;IPv4 is absolutely fine. Consumers can be behind NAT. That&amp;#39;s fine. Servers can be behind reverse proxies, routing by DNS hostname. That&amp;#39;s also fine. IPv4 address might be a valuable resource, shared between multiple users. Nothing wrong with it. Yes, it denies simple P2P connectivity. World doesn&amp;#39;t need it. Consumers are behind firewalls either way. We need a way for consumers to connect to a server. That&amp;#39;s all.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, though others point out that these workarounds complicate simple tasks like hosting personal servers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825799&quot; title=&quot;You&amp;#39;re the reason I have to call my ISP to host a minecraft server for a couple of my friends.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47826392&quot; title=&quot;No, they&amp;#39;re not. That&amp;#39;s other weird policies specific to your ISP. With IPv4 + NAT, you have a public IP address. That public address goes to your router. Your router can forward any port to any machine on your LAN. I used to run Minecraft servers from a residential connection on IPv4, it was fine. Never had to call the ISP.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical friction persists in dual-stack environments, where ideological RFC requirements can cause IPv6 timeouts and broken builds even on systems without global IPv6 connectivity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47826762&quot; title=&quot;In fact, 30 years later, I just had to add a IPv6 block on Ubuntu’s apt mirrors this week, because the aaaa record query has higher priority and was timing out on my CI, killing build times. That behavior is due to the same politics mentioned above. A few more pragmatic decisions, or at least empathetic guidance would have dramatically changed the acceptance of ipv6.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47827875&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; AAAA records have lower priority than A records if you don&amp;#39;t have a v6 address assigned on your system. (Link-locals don&amp;#39;t count for this). There is an expired 6man draft that explains some of the issues here. https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-buraglio-6man-rfc6724-... To be clear, I go and clean out the temporary fixes for dual stack problems, but you want some more info so here it is. $ grep  &amp;#39;apt.systemd.daily&amp;#39; /var/log/syslog.1 |  grep &amp;#39;^2026-04-16T01:09&amp;#39; | wc -l       86375         $…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pcgamer.com/games/world-of-warcraft/turtle-wow-classic-server-announces-shutdown-after-blizzard-wins-injunction/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Turtle WoW classic server announces shutdown after Blizzard wins injunction&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (pcgamer.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825160&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;188 points · 159 comments · by Brajeshwar&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The popular &amp;#34;Classic Plus&amp;#34; private server Turtle WoW will shut down on May 14 following a successful copyright injunction and settlement won by Blizzard. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pcgamer.com/games/world-of-warcraft/turtle-wow-classic-server-announces-shutdown-after-blizzard-wins-injunction/&quot; title=&quot;Turtle WoW classic server announces shutdown after Blizzard wins injunction    &amp;#39;They say it&amp;#39;s the journey, not the destination.&amp;#39;    ![](https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p/?c1=2&amp;amp;c2=10055482&amp;amp;cv=4.4.0&amp;amp;cj=1)    [Skip to main content](#main)    ![](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/2mwhi9nob41771257147.svg)Join The Club    - Join our community    JOIN NOW    11    Premium Benefits    24/7    Access Available    28K+    Active…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While users acknowledge that Blizzard is within its legal rights to protect its IP, many argue that Turtle WoW’s innovative roguelike mechanics and custom content were more compelling than Blizzard’s official offerings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825421&quot; title=&quot;Just background in case you don&amp;#39;t know: Turtle WoW tried to turn Classic World of Warcraft into a Roguelike, but in doing so wound up creating a bunch of new mechanics, and a gameplay loop that was quite unique even relative to other Roguelikes. So my position on this is; two things can be true at the same time: - Turtle WoW violated Blizzard&amp;#39;s copyright, tried to charge money for some services, and Blizzard are well within their legal (and moral) rights to shut that down. - Turtle WoW is more…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47826055&quot; title=&quot;I ran a private server years ago. Two things people in this thread are getting wrong: The engineering is way harder than anyone gives credit for. You&amp;#39;re reverse engineering a server protocol from the client binary, writing your own spell systems (thousands of spells, each with edge cases), pathing, instancing, combat mechanics. Then scaling it for a few thousand concurrent players on hardware you&amp;#39;re paying for out of pocket. Turtle WoW went further and built new raids, zones, races on top of…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters debated whether the project should be viewed as a simple piracy operation or a feat of complex game development, noting that many successful franchises like *Counter-Strike* and *Dota 2* originated as similar community mods &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825478&quot; title=&quot;Many hit games originated as mods. If the Turtle WoW team really are on to something, they should pursue it as an independent game.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47826055&quot; title=&quot;I ran a private server years ago. Two things people in this thread are getting wrong: The engineering is way harder than anyone gives credit for. You&amp;#39;re reverse engineering a server protocol from the client binary, writing your own spell systems (thousands of spells, each with edge cases), pathing, instancing, combat mechanics. Then scaling it for a few thousand concurrent players on hardware you&amp;#39;re paying for out of pocket. Turtle WoW went further and built new raids, zones, races on top of…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47826976&quot; title=&quot;Counter-Strike Every MOBA that exists (DotA, LoL, HoN, etc) Team Fortress Killing Floor PUBG Natural Selection Undoubtedly, many more that I can&amp;#39;t recall off the top of my head.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47826395&quot; title=&quot;Ever heard of Dota 2? PUBG? Team Fortress 2?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant frustration regarding Blizzard&amp;#39;s litigious approach compared to companies like Valve, which often acquire and professionalize popular mods to build community goodwill &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47826054&quot; title=&quot;Why not just buy it then? It reminds me of Valve’s treatment of Black Mesa, which made the community love the company even more. It’d be hilariously easy for Blizzard to spend some money on the thing and just buy the devs out, fans love you for it and it builds good will with a fanbase. Corporations can’t see past the legal aspect of things I guess.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47826142&quot; title=&quot;Valve aren&amp;#39;t owned by private equity and other giant corporations so they make good decisions and do things fans like. A lot of their entire platform is built on mods they&amp;#39;ve bought and turned into proper 1st class games (cs, dota, Garys mod etc)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47826244&quot; title=&quot;I feel like every large public corporation inevitably turns into a rent seeking parasite. How do we build a system that has more calves and fewer blizzards? How do we incentivize that?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/swiss-ai/swiss-authorities-want-to-reduce-dependency-on-microsoft/91280532&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Swiss authorities want to reduce dependency on Microsoft&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (swissinfo.ch)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47827383&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;207 points · 79 comments · by doener&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Swiss government plans to gradually replace Microsoft products with open-source software to improve data security and digital sovereignty, following concerns over U.S. authorities&amp;#39; legal ability to access data stored on American cloud servers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/swiss-ai/swiss-authorities-want-to-reduce-dependency-on-microsoft/91280532&quot; title=&quot;Title: Swiss authorities want to reduce dependency on Microsoft    URL Source: https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/swiss-ai/swiss-authorities-want-to-reduce-dependency-on-microsoft/91280532    Published Time: 2026-04-19T10:34:42Z    Markdown Content:  # Swiss authorities want to reduce dependency on Microsoft - SWI swissinfo.ch    *   [Jump to home page](https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/ &amp;#39;[Keyboard shortcut + 1]&amp;#39;)  *   [Jump to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While there is growing political momentum in Europe to reduce reliance on US-based services &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47827790&quot; title=&quot;We move slow. But the clima for change is here now, it&amp;#39;s been brewing for a decade or so.  Expect Europe to not use more money on US services the next two decade. So with inflation you will really see a significant decline. My 5 cents&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, commenters highlight that Microsoft’s &amp;#34;true moat&amp;#34; is Excel, which functions as a sophisticated business automation tool rather than a simple spreadsheet &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47827745&quot; title=&quot;I feel like Excel is their one true moat. Everything else is a business play, but Excel is the only truly superior tech compared to the alternatives.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47828143&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; LibreOffice Calc Mentioning libreoffice as competitor to Excel and Access is like you haven&amp;#39;t understood the market, at all. Excel is a cross department business automation database, which can sync/pull/push datasets across filesystems and networks. VBA is the single most used language in Enterprise because it allows to automate pretty much any financial workflow. And more importantly: automated by non-programmers. Libreoffice is made for private users, and that&amp;#39;s not the same users that VBA…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that alternatives like LibreOffice Calc fail to match Excel&amp;#39;s ability to handle complex financial workflows and cross-department data synchronization &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47828143&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; LibreOffice Calc Mentioning libreoffice as competitor to Excel and Access is like you haven&amp;#39;t understood the market, at all. Excel is a cross department business automation database, which can sync/pull/push datasets across filesystems and networks. VBA is the single most used language in Enterprise because it allows to automate pretty much any financial workflow. And more importantly: automated by non-programmers. Libreoffice is made for private users, and that&amp;#39;s not the same users that VBA…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, replacing the broader ecosystem is technically daunting, as few on-premise solutions can match the integrated calendar, contact, and authentication features of Microsoft Exchange &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47828004&quot; title=&quot;Not easy at all. Think about integrating calendars, corporate contacts (from AD), handling RSVP replies said mx server receives and updating the calendar server, securely deal with modern auth (+ legacy krb5 auth, yuk). It&amp;#39;s a huge hassle and everything except Exchange only handles 80% of this. Modern expectations now want: web clients (OWA), todo lists, integrated storage (SP/OneDrive), and push notifications to any phone from any vendor. So yeah, the only on prem solution is still Exchange.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these hurdles, tools like the &amp;#34;MX Map&amp;#34; are being used to track the current level of dependency across Swiss municipalities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47827716&quot; title=&quot;For anyone interested in the current state of things in Switzerland, there is this handy map of which Swiss municipalities are dependent on Microsoft/the US right now: https://mxmap.ch/&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47827814&quot; title=&quot;Cool map! MX as in mail exchanger. For something as easy (for IT pros at least) as email, that map should be all green!&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://warontherocks.com/cogs-of-war/the-bromine-chokepoint-how-strife-in-the-middle-east-could-halt-production-of-the-worlds-memory-chips/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Bromine Chokepoint&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (warontherocks.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47826100&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;182 points · 90 comments · by crescit_eundo&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Conflict in the Middle East threatens the global semiconductor supply chain due to a heavy reliance on Israeli bromine, a critical material for memory chip production with no immediate substitutes or alternative purification facilities. &lt;a href=&quot;https://warontherocks.com/cogs-of-war/the-bromine-chokepoint-how-strife-in-the-middle-east-could-halt-production-of-the-worlds-memory-chips/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Bromine Chokepoint: How Strife in the Middle East Could Halt Production of the World’s Memory Chips    URL Source: https://warontherocks.com/cogs-of-war/the-bromine-chokepoint-how-strife-in-the-middle-east-could-halt-production-of-the-worlds-memory-chips/    Published Time: 2026-04-14T08:00:09+00:00    Markdown Content:  # The Bromine Chokepoint: How Strife in the Middle East Could Halt Production of the World’s Memory Chips    [![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some argue that a bromine shortage is unlikely due to abundant global reserves in the US and seawater &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47827602&quot; title=&quot;No, there isn&amp;#39;t likely to be a bromine shortage. The US is a major producer of bromine.[1] It&amp;#39;s not at all rare. It&amp;#39;s just that the cheapest source is the Dead Sea, because that&amp;#39;s concentrated brine. There are bromine wells in Arkansas. It&amp;#39;s a by-product from some oil wells. It&amp;#39;s in seawater. In California alone, the Salton Sea and the SF salt evaporator ponds are potential sources. If the price goes up, the use of bromine for pool chemicals and fracking fluids will be affected long before the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others emphasize that the specific vulnerability lies in the co-location of extraction and high-purity hydrogen bromide production at a single facility in a conflict zone &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47827207&quot; title=&quot;The article isn’t arguing that if ICL facilities are disrupted, that’s it, no more bromine forever. It is saying that if these facilities are disrupted there will be an even bigger problem with DRAM supply than already exists because there is no excess supply, no good alternative, and no quick way to ramp up production. This dismissive contrarian Pollyanna attitude might serve well to minimise your personal anxiety, but I do not see how what you are saying is in any way the correct approach for…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47827946&quot; title=&quot;The problem is high-quality hydrogen bromide, from the article. &amp;#39;Critically, ICL’s hydrogen bromide gas production, including the semiconductor-grade output supplied to South Korean fabrication plants, is manufactured at the same Sodom facility where extraction occurs, meaning extraction and conversion infrastructure are co-located in the same vulnerable corridor.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Skeptics view this as another instance of overblown &amp;#34;resource depletion&amp;#34; narratives, suggesting that global markets typically adapt to such disruptions by shifting to slightly more expensive alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47826623&quot; title=&quot;Ah, this week&amp;#39;s iteration of &amp;#39;we&amp;#39;re running out of sand&amp;#39;. I&amp;#39;m sure one of these predictions will eventually come true, but we have articles that overstate the likelihood and consequences of running out of pretty much every month. I&amp;#39;m not keeping track, but some of the things we ran out of include sand, helium, tellurium, tantalum, niobium, bees...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47826694&quot; title=&quot;I have a sense of complacency regarding all these. There’s always The One Factory In North Carolina That Produces The Essential Ingredient and it turns out that it’s just the price optimal one and there is enough capacity around the world to substitute. Everything from Peak Oil to today has the globalized market/trade machine meeting the needs continuously with only leaf nodes for products being the constraint. Almost all inputs have been commoditized.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. However, proponents of the &amp;#34;chokepoint&amp;#34; theory argue that even if shipping can be bypassed via airlift, the lack of immediate excess capacity for semiconductor-grade output poses a significant risk to the DRAM supply chain &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47827207&quot; title=&quot;The article isn’t arguing that if ICL facilities are disrupted, that’s it, no more bromine forever. It is saying that if these facilities are disrupted there will be an even bigger problem with DRAM supply than already exists because there is no excess supply, no good alternative, and no quick way to ramp up production. This dismissive contrarian Pollyanna attitude might serve well to minimise your personal anxiety, but I do not see how what you are saying is in any way the correct approach for…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47828387&quot; title=&quot;The production facility is a real vulnerability but the shipping factor is overstated - total supply for silicone etching could be airlifted. It’ll be more expensive but not a crisis.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://12gramsofcarbon.com/p/notes-from-the-sf-peptide-scene&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Notes from the SF peptide scene&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (12gramsofcarbon.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824681&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;126 points · &lt;strong&gt;134 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by theahura&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The San Francisco tech scene has shifted its focus from AI to &amp;#34;cheap Chinese peptides,&amp;#34; with social circles now revolving around injectable weight-loss drugs, niche house parties, and a high-sincerity culture that treats startup allegiances like techno-feudal houses. &lt;a href=&quot;https://12gramsofcarbon.com/p/notes-from-the-sf-peptide-scene&quot; title=&quot;Title: Notes from the SF Peptide Scene    URL Source: https://12gramsofcarbon.com/p/notes-from-the-sf-peptide-scene    Published Time: 2026-04-17T15:31:21+00:00    Markdown Content:  _Previously: [Notes from the SF Party Scene](https://12gramsofcarbon.com/p/notes-from-the-sf-party-scene)_    Scott Alexander writes an [excellent series of posts](https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/sota-on-bay-area-house-party) about Bay Area house parties. He’s written more than a half-dozen at this point. They all involve…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether the &amp;#34;SF peptide scene&amp;#34; is a legitimate cultural shift or merely a sensationalized account of a niche, reckless drug subculture &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825083&quot; title=&quot;This article is an anecdote extrapolated to something bigger: A type of lazy writing where the writer has a single social experience with a group of weird people and then writes about it like it’s the common experience in a place. The writer went to SF for a few days and went to one party where a group of friends were into peptides. From the article, they were also particularly terrible people. Just read this quote: &amp;gt; “They change your personality, it’s literally made me less shallow knowing…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825702&quot; title=&quot;WTF is any of this, is there some ELI5/OOTL explanation? I work in big tech and have never heard anyone talk about &amp;#39;peptides&amp;#39;. Is this a startup scene thing or just an SF thing? (I live in New York) all of my coworkers are pretty normal, sure there are the stereotypical fitness types that are marathon training, cycling, or have a climbing gym membership but no one is talking about buying weird Chinese drugs&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue the writing extrapolates a single &amp;#34;quirky&amp;#34; party experience into an authoritative trend piece, masking what is essentially dangerous self-experimentation with gray-market substances &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825083&quot; title=&quot;This article is an anecdote extrapolated to something bigger: A type of lazy writing where the writer has a single social experience with a group of weird people and then writes about it like it’s the common experience in a place. The writer went to SF for a few days and went to one party where a group of friends were into peptides. From the article, they were also particularly terrible people. Just read this quote: &amp;gt; “They change your personality, it’s literally made me less shallow knowing…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825912&quot; title=&quot;Kinda wild to me that people are down with injecting mystery substances received from the other end of the world entirely outside any real medical chain or certainty of contents or recourse. Like black market steroids except with less track record&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825266&quot; title=&quot;Okay? Points still stand: It’s written as an authoritative exploration of a social scene extrapolated from a few days visiting a place and attending one party. If someone’s writing in journalistic style I think it’s fair to criticize it as journalism, even if it’s on Substack&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, some defenders view the account as a &amp;#34;delightfully written&amp;#34; vignette of a specific social nexus where revolutionary biotechnology meets the tech elite &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825259&quot; title=&quot;They did point out, with numbers, that the SF scene is a lot smaller than would ordinarily be expected. Additionally this is the party scene which is a subset of the general tech scene. These people have more time and money to spare than those who are busy working but they do form a bit of a nexus that channels information. The blog post seems to go to great lengths not to pretend that it is something that it isn’t. I think it’s important to understand that AI, even at its current level, is…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825315&quot; title=&quot;It is not presented as authoritative anything, except perhaps one person&amp;#39;s experience. And we should assume it is embellished. You are taking this far too seriously. It is a vignette which captures the flavor of a place at a particular time. And it is delightfully written.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant disagreement over the &amp;#34;sincerity&amp;#34; of these users, with some viewing their desire to &amp;#34;looksmax&amp;#34; via injections as the opposite of sincere behavior &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825289&quot; title=&quot;I’m not really understanding the notion that these people are so sincere. Perhaps we have different definitions of sincerity. To my eye, the entire fascination of unsafely injecting peptides in a desire to change your being is largely the opposite of sincerity.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825019&quot; title=&quot;I think this author has a very different conception of what “sincerity” is than I do, but I guess that’s the difference between the east coast and the west coast.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/woot17/woot17-paper-guri.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SPEAKE(a)R: Turn Speakers to Microphones for Fun and Profit [pdf] (2017)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (usenix.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822805&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;172 points · 69 comments · by Eridanus2&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Researchers have developed &amp;#34;SPEAKE(a)R,&amp;#34; a malware prototype that exploits &amp;#34;jack retasking&amp;#34; features in common audio chipsets to covertly transform connected headphones into microphones, enabling high-quality eavesdropping from up to nine meters away even on computers without a dedicated microphone. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/woot17/woot17-paper-guri.pdf&quot; title=&quot;Title: Microsoft Word - WOOT - camera - 1    URL Source: https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/woot17/woot17-paper-guri.pdf    Published Time: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 05:14:03 GMT    Number of Pages: 10    Markdown Content:  # SPEAKE(a)R: Turn Speakers to Microphones for Fun and Profit     # Abstract     It&amp;#39;s possible to manipulate the headphones, earphones,     and simple earbuds connected to a computer, silently     turning them into a pair of eavesdropping microphones.     This paper focuses on the cyber…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights the reversible nature of transducers, noting that speakers can function as microphones and dynamic microphones can act as speakers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823022&quot; title=&quot;A magnet in a coil operates both ways, this is non intuitive but perfectly sound. Not sure if it&amp;#39;s mentioned in the article but microphones can be speakers too...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822931&quot; title=&quot;This shouldn&amp;#39;t be downvoted. Transducers being reversible is a neat and non-obvious thing.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823119&quot; title=&quot;Not sure if it&amp;#39;s mentioned in the article but microphones can be speakers too... Only dynamic mics, which are relatively rare and seldom encountered without an attached preamp. The vast majority of mics for PCs are condensers and electrets. Anything can be a speaker, briefly and only once, if you apply enough voltage to it...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Users shared notable anecdotes, such as a teenager recording a full rap album using broken headphones as a makeshift microphone &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823885&quot; title=&quot;When I was a teenager I was friends with an extremely poor kid who literally lived on the wrong side of the tracks. He couldn’t afford a microphone and used an old pair of busted headphones to rap into as a microphone. He had recorded and produced a whole album like this with Fruity Loops on an old computer he found discarded at the side of the road.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824602&quot; title=&quot;He ended up producing a documentary you can watch, called 7 Mile.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt; and the use of this principle in drive-thru kiosks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824190&quot; title=&quot;This is how drive-thru kiosks work (principal, not the specific implementation). Source: I used to measure the “microphone” frequency response for a kiosk OEM.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters discussed the technical limitations of reversing condenser or electret microphones &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823119&quot; title=&quot;Not sure if it&amp;#39;s mentioned in the article but microphones can be speakers too... Only dynamic mics, which are relatively rare and seldom encountered without an attached preamp. The vast majority of mics for PCs are condensers and electrets. Anything can be a speaker, briefly and only once, if you apply enough voltage to it...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others speculated on the potential for such techniques to be used for unauthorized eavesdropping &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823169&quot; title=&quot;If this or an accelerometer based recording is what Meta uses to eavesdrop on in-person talk then color me pink&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/keep-pushing-we-get-10-more-days-reform-section-702&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Keep Pushing: We Get 10 More Days to Reform Section 702&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (eff.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822356&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;178 points · 43 comments · by nobody9999&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lawmakers have secured a 10-day extension to debate reforms for Section 702, as advocates push for a probable cause warrant requirement to limit FBI access to Americans&amp;#39; communications collected under the mass spying program. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/keep-pushing-we-get-10-more-days-reform-section-702&quot; title=&quot;Title: Keep Pushing: We Get 10 More Days to Reform Section 702    URL Source: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/keep-pushing-we-get-10-more-days-reform-section-702    Published Time: 2026-04-17T12:26:27-07:00    Markdown Content:  # Keep Pushing: We Get 10 More Days to Reform Section 702 | Electronic Frontier Foundation  [Skip to main content](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/keep-pushing-we-get-10-more-days-reform-section-702#main-content)    *   [About](https://www.eff.org/about)      *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters emphasize that Section 702 (PRISM) allows the government to bypass warrants to collect vast amounts of private data from providers like Google and Apple &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822753&quot; title=&quot;Reminder: this is their #1 most used tool for collecting data.  Snowden told us of the existence of this program under the codename PRISM. This allows them to download the entire contents of your gmail instantly, directly from Google, without a warrant.  Or your iCloud Photos and Backups (complete iMessage history) directly from Apple.  No warrant required.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this violates the Fourth Amendment, others note that the program technically targets foreigners, allowing the &amp;#34;incidental&amp;#34; collection of American data to persist through legal loopholes and international intelligence sharing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823512&quot; title=&quot;No. First, FISA was created in 1978 to protect Americans from the CIA by forcing them to show probably casuse. Section 702 of FISA is about intercepting any foreigners communications for which they need no warrent. But the CIA incidentally collects data of U.S citizens during these warrentless wire taps, and that would be the 4th amendment challenge, but so far that is going nowhere.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824656&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s also the game that they play where they spoof BGP announcements that cause routing changes for domestic traffic that makes it flow out and then back into the US, making it fair game for collection.  Also, our Five Eyes partners aren&amp;#39;t prohibited from collecting on US targets, and we all share.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant portion of the debate focuses on the EFF&amp;#39;s decision to leave X (formerly Twitter), with critics arguing it alienates allies, while defenders claim the platform&amp;#39;s declining reach made it an ineffective tool for their mission &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823639&quot; title=&quot;Adapting my reply to a comment: By leaving X, EFF has made a “politically correct” statement outside their core mission, which alienates potential allies.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822577&quot; title=&quot;Might have more people who care if they were still on X. EFF is a lost cause.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825764&quot; title=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/eff-leaving-x They say the typical post on X receives 3M impressions vs. 100M impressions in years past. They&amp;#39;re a national organization, those 3M impressions might only be 100k actual people in a country of 400M. They do say that ideology was part of the motivation but it makes sense that they aren&amp;#39;t going to invest the time in a platform that reaches a negligible number of people. It makes sense that they use FOSS decentralized stuff like Mastodon despite…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a cynical consensus that the Constitution has lost its protective power due to political apathy and the &amp;#34;parasitic&amp;#34; interests of the ruling class &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823240&quot; title=&quot;The constitution lost its power long ago, and is now a mere fig leaf of legitimacy. Plenty of things ought to be unconstitutional based on a plain reading of the constitution. Civil forfeiture, unlimited gun rights, qualified immunity, FISA courts, various “emergency” powers, deportation of US citizens, etc, etc. The trouble is that a huge portion of Americans don’t really care about any of this, so long as these violations are used to stick it to liberals, all is forgiven.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823600&quot; title=&quot;I find such framing challenging because you are correct, the Constitution lost its power a long time ago, but I would not limit the cause of that lost power to only a rather recent ideological adversary, those you imagine would say “stick it to liberals”. Unfortunately for everyone but the parasitic ruling class that is plundering America and the world, the changes and damage done to the Constitution in the name of progress have not only been the primary vehicle of that damage from the start,…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47826125&quot; title=&quot;It shouldn&amp;#39;t be reformed! It should be eliminated... Enforce the 4th amendment!!! Properly interpret the 2nd...&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/article/pm-carney-declares-us-ties-now-a-weakness-in-address-to-canadians/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;PM Carney declares U.S. ties now a &amp;#39;weakness&amp;#39; in address to Canadians&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ctvnews.ca)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825423&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;123 points · 91 comments · by Teever&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Prime Minister Mark Carney has declared Canada’s long-standing relationship with the United States a &amp;#34;weakness&amp;#34; that must be corrected, citing a need to respond to economic challenges and shifting trade ties under the Trump presidency. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/article/pm-carney-declares-us-ties-now-a-weakness-in-address-to-canadians/&quot; title=&quot;‘The U.S. has changed and we must respond,’ says PM Carney in direct address    In a direct address to the nation, Prime Minister Mark Carney has reframed Canada&amp;#39;s long-standing relationship with the United States as a &amp;#39;weakness&amp;#39; that must be urgently corrected under the shadow of the Trump presidency.    [Skip to main content](#main)    Sections    [![CTVNews Logo](https://static.themebuilder.aws.arc.pub/bellmediainc/1730923620658.svg)](/ &amp;#39;CTVNews Logo&amp;#39;)[Local](/local)[Watch](/video)[Trade…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a significant breakdown in trust between Canada and the U.S., with many attributing the shift to the Trump administration&amp;#39;s aggressive trade policies and tariffs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825631&quot; title=&quot;Good.  Many Canadians view Carney as a &amp;#39;war-time&amp;#39; PM and I think that&amp;#39;s accurate. The Trump administration has treated Canada and Canadians appallingly.  It will take many years and another President, but I hope the U.S. can repair relations.  The onus is on us. Canada honored its commitments.  The U.S. started this stupid trade war.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47827931&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not just Canada, who is going to trust US anymore? Certainly no Europe after tarrifs, NATO, Ukraine, and this war.. Certainly not GCC after this war Certainly not Asia after this war Certainly not Japan after the awful &amp;#39;nuke&amp;#39; jokes and abuses  .. like really? Who is on US aside? Dems can try all they want, but the US trust is gone imo.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825705&quot; title=&quot;For additional context: - Carney&amp;#39;s Davos speech (Jan 2026) evoked &amp;#39;workers of the world unite&amp;#39; [1]; - Carney&amp;#39;s pre-election speech (Mar 2025) claimed the old relationship with the US is over [2]; and - Trump&amp;#39;s handling of Canada relations, particularly with the tariff frenzy, basically ended up giving the election to Carney [3]. This administration is busy destroying the relationships and institutions that the US created for America&amp;#39;s interests like NATO. [1]:…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some American commenters express regret and a desire for friendly relations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47827097&quot; title=&quot;Conservative voting American here.  I can’t imagine that happening, and have never heard of anything even remotely similar. I read a variety of sources, and honestly the most critical things Ive seen about Canada involved Trudeau.  ( The very most critical were about Trudeau dressing in blackface, which I admit mystifies me. ) I’d say the most prevalent attitude I see towards Canada is to wish you well.  I think almost all Americans want for Canadians to be proud, independent neighbors. P.S. …&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825588&quot; title=&quot;My dear friends to the north: I just want to repeat how sorry many of us are for this.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825641&quot; title=&quot;And that some of us are trying to change the situation. My reps have heard from me multiple times.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, Canadians largely view the current U.S. stance as a threat to their sovereignty, leading to a consensus that the traditional alliance has fundamentally changed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825562&quot; title=&quot;It wasn’t a surprise to us. It’s how Canadians already feel. Threaten our sovereignty and that’s what happens.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825705&quot; title=&quot;For additional context: - Carney&amp;#39;s Davos speech (Jan 2026) evoked &amp;#39;workers of the world unite&amp;#39; [1]; - Carney&amp;#39;s pre-election speech (Mar 2025) claimed the old relationship with the US is over [2]; and - Trump&amp;#39;s handling of Canada relations, particularly with the tariff frenzy, basically ended up giving the election to Carney [3]. This administration is busy destroying the relationships and institutions that the US created for America&amp;#39;s interests like NATO. [1]:…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47826171&quot; title=&quot;It takes much longer to regain trust that it takes to lose it.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Some participants warn that this erosion of trust extends globally, though others worry Canada may focus too much on external blame rather than addressing internal issues like &amp;#34;brain drain&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47827931&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not just Canada, who is going to trust US anymore? Certainly no Europe after tarrifs, NATO, Ukraine, and this war.. Certainly not GCC after this war Certainly not Asia after this war Certainly not Japan after the awful &amp;#39;nuke&amp;#39; jokes and abuses  .. like really? Who is on US aside? Dems can try all they want, but the US trust is gone imo.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47825706&quot; title=&quot;As a Canadian I feel like this country has some problems that contribute to the brain drain south.  And I feel like Trump is definitely not our friend but the situation could have been helpful to stir us up to self reflection.  But I fear that instead we will just try to recreate the former status quo by whatever means and call that a victory.  But what it means is the inevitable decline of this country.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/ex-ceo-ex-cfo-bankrupt-ai-company-charged-with-fraud-2026-04-17/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ex-CEO, ex-CFO of iLearningEngines charged with fraud&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (reuters.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47828225&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;151 points · 62 comments · by 1vuio0pswjnm7&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/ex-ceo-ex-cfo-bankrupt-ai-company-charged-with-fraud-2026-04-17/&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The iLearningEngines fraud involved fabricating approximately 90% of its $421 million revenue through forged contracts and &amp;#34;round trip&amp;#34; fund transfers, a scheme eventually exposed by Hindenburg Research &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47828764&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; they  defrauded investors and lenders by fabricating &amp;#39;virtually all&amp;#39; of the now-bankrupt company&amp;#39;s customer  relationships and revenue. &amp;gt; According to the  indictment,  the defendants used forged sham contracts to make it seem that iLearning&amp;#39;s customers were real, and used &amp;#39;round trip&amp;#39; transfers of investor and lender funds -- meaning they sent money to purported customers, who then returned it to iLearning -- to manufacture revenue. &amp;gt; At least  90% of iLearning&amp;#39;s $421 million  of reported…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47828366&quot; title=&quot;iLearningEngines .. hindenburg did some research ILearningEngines: An AI SPAC with Artificial Partners and Artificial Revenue (2 years ago) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41390619&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that federal investigations take too long for the public to notice the eventual convictions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47828868&quot; title=&quot;Federal investigations always take forever.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47828983&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a real problem at this point. People still say &amp;#39;nobody went to jail for the GFC&amp;#39; even though over 200 people did in the US; it&amp;#39;s just it took a decade and nobody actually paid attention a decade later when they went to jail.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest the perpetrators are unlikely to escape punishment because they &amp;#34;stole from the rich&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47828965&quot; title=&quot;No, that seems unlikely. They committed the cardinal sin of stealing from the rich.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights the trend of companies rebranding as &amp;#34;AI companies&amp;#34; to attract investment, drawing parallels to previous buzzwords like blockchain and big data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47828764&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; they  defrauded investors and lenders by fabricating &amp;#39;virtually all&amp;#39; of the now-bankrupt company&amp;#39;s customer  relationships and revenue. &amp;gt; According to the  indictment,  the defendants used forged sham contracts to make it seem that iLearning&amp;#39;s customers were real, and used &amp;#39;round trip&amp;#39; transfers of investor and lender funds -- meaning they sent money to purported customers, who then returned it to iLearning -- to manufacture revenue. &amp;gt; At least  90% of iLearning&amp;#39;s $421 million  of reported…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47828959&quot; title=&quot;Unfortunately, in 2026 even shoe companies are &amp;#39;AI companies&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47829387&quot; title=&quot;Half a decade ago they were all blockchain companies. Before that  I don’t remember, what was the buzzword, big data?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.legalnomads.com/fish-sauce/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A Brief History of Fish Sauce&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (legalnomads.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822734&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;149 points · 62 comments · by vinhnx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fish sauce, a staple of Southeast Asian cuisine, has a complex history with debated origins ranging from ancient Greek and Roman fermented condiments to early Chinese techniques for fermenting fish with beans. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.legalnomads.com/fish-sauce/&quot; title=&quot;Title: A Brief History of Fish Sauce    URL Source: https://www.legalnomads.com/fish-sauce/    Published Time: Sun, 19 Apr 2026 17:45:16 GMT    Markdown Content:  # A Brief History of Fish Sauce  [Skip to content](https://www.legalnomads.com/fish-sauce/#content)    [![Image 1: Legal Nomads](https://www.legalnomads.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/LN_SmallLogoDark-200x78.png)](https://www.legalnomads.com/)    *   [About](https://www.legalnomads.com/about/)      *   [About Jodi &amp;amp; Legal…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While fish sauce is often associated with Southeast Asian cuisine, commenters note that Western staples like Worcestershire sauce and ketchup share similar fermented fish origins &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47829526&quot; title=&quot;So the West still does have a fish sauce in common use, although one that&amp;#39;s not nearly as strong as the eastern variants.  Worcestershire sauce was an attempt to recreate an Indian fish sauce, and to this day contains anchovies.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47829890&quot; title=&quot;Ketchup also has origins from fish sauce&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47829357&quot; title=&quot;Worcestershire sauce is a fish sauce that&amp;#39;s used all over American cuisine, especially BBQ.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. A central debate exists regarding its application: some users argue that a &amp;#34;fishy&amp;#34; smell indicates over-application &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47829203&quot; title=&quot;Fish sauce is not supposed to be added to the point that you can taste the fishy taste, you do get that right? If you’ve added enough to impart fishy taste, you’ve added way too much.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend that the strong, polarizing scent is inherent to the product and can be off-putting to those unaccustomed to it &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47829031&quot; title=&quot;I bought a bottle of Vietnamese fish sauce (Red Boat brand, the most recommended brand) and added a teaspoon to some pea leaves. I loved the resulting flavor, but my partner did not and complained that it had too much of a fishy smell. A lot of cooking techniques actually seek to remove this fishy smell even when cooking fish, so it was not welcome to add this to something that didn’t contain fish in the first place. It’s certainly not a flavor everyone would like.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47829199&quot; title=&quot;At least in the US, fish in general is somewhat polarizing and, probably especially, strong tasting fish like anchovies, fish sauce, etc. Just not something probably the majority of people grew up with.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47829373&quot; title=&quot;Yep. But unlike, say Red Boat, I  don’t know anyone who thinks it has a strong rancid taste.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these sensory disagreements, enthusiasts highlight its versatility as a &amp;#34;cheat code&amp;#34; for dishes like scrambled eggs or as a subject for DIY fermentation experiments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822826&quot; title=&quot;Thanks for sharing. It is especially interesting to hear the factors that contributed to the decline of fish sauce use in the west. One thing I am “stealing” from SEA is fish sauce in scrambled eggs. Feels almost like a cheat code.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47828775&quot; title=&quot;Homemade garum is a fun kitchen experiment, if you have the equipment and patience. Heat + protease + protein substrate is really all you need.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ashley.rolfmore.com/stop-trying-to-engineer-your-way-out-of-listening-to-people/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Stop trying to engineer your way out of listening to people&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ashley.rolfmore.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47827259&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;123 points · 40 comments · by walterbell&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that software professionals must stop using &amp;#34;systems&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;frameworks&amp;#34; to avoid direct human interaction, highlighting that true listening requires overcoming personal biases, judging less, and acknowledging that user needs and technical expertise are diverse and constantly evolving. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ashley.rolfmore.com/stop-trying-to-engineer-your-way-out-of-listening-to-people/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Stop trying to engineer your way out of listening to people    URL Source: https://ashley.rolfmore.com/stop-trying-to-engineer-your-way-out-of-listening-to-people/    Published Time: 2026-02-12T00:26:20.000Z    Markdown Content:  I spend a lot of time negotiating this in the software world:    ![Image 1: Unfinished road opening ceremony from Spongebob Squarepants](https://ashley.rolfmore.com/content/images/2026/02/image.png)    Probably don&amp;#39;t want this road    And if you&amp;#39;re wondering why this…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether poor workplace communication stems from an excess of meetings or a fundamental lack of listening skills, with some arguing that &amp;#34;minimum viable&amp;#34; communication time would force better focus &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47829956&quot; title=&quot;Or maybe we&amp;#39;re spending too much time on communicating. If too much time is allocated then its hard to stay focused and there&amp;#39;s always the next time that can be used to clarify. Cut all the unnecessary meetings and only allocate the minimum viable time to communicate. Then everyone will be listening.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47830287&quot; title=&quot;You&amp;#39;ve missed the point and agreed with the GP. Too much time is spent attempting to communicate and as such, communication isn&amp;#39;t actually happening. (i.e. we all spend way too much time in useless meetings where nothing happens and few people are any more informed than they were before)&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others contend that most meetings are actually prescriptive or dictatorial rather than communicative, leading to a &amp;#34;philosophical&amp;#34; disagreement over whether the problem is the quantity of meetings or the quality of the interaction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47830186&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Or maybe we&amp;#39;re spending too much time on communicating. This is a phenomena I have yet to experience in the wild. &amp;gt; Cut all the unnecessary meetings and only allocate the minimum viable time to communicate. Most meetings are not about communication. They are usually prescriptive in form and dictatorial in nature. &amp;gt; Then everyone will be listening. Listening is a skill, one which is can be perfected if practiced. Neither meetings nor their duration are contributory to this skill.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47830386&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Too much time is spent attempting to communicate and as such, communication isn&amp;#39;t actually happening. This is where I think we have a different definition of communication. &amp;gt; (i.e. we all spend way too much time in useless meetings where nothing happens and few people are any more informed than they were before) Hence my clarification of: Most meetings are not about communication. They are usually     prescriptive in form and dictatorial in nature. For example, if a project kick-off meeting…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47830343&quot; title=&quot;Maybe this is just my interpretation but OP effectively argued &amp;#39;too many ineffective meetings, we should have less unnecessary meetings and a clearer, independent direction&amp;#39;. The commenter above argued that the problem was slightly different, it&amp;#39;s not too many meetings for communication but too many that are not achieving effective communication. A meeting in itself does not create communication (of information and exchange of opinions etc.) and the commenter wanted to increase the number of…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47830487&quot; title=&quot;Standard philosophical problem, you&amp;#39;re disagreeing about the definition of a word instead of the content of the message. Step back and think if a dispute over the usage of the word is necessary or helpful in this context. Amusingly this is where a lot of communication goes to die, loss of the big picture and discussion of how to use particular words. Clearly you agree with OP about how time is wasted but you&amp;#39;re insisting on using different language to express the same idea.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Participants also highlighted that technical friction often arises from non-technical stakeholders failing to understand the cost of their requests, suggesting that rigorous documentation and &amp;#34;translation&amp;#34; are more effective than simply engineering new systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47830425&quot; title=&quot;Most of the problem is that talking to non technical people is frustrating, they often start like 1. Can u add X  2. Can u change Y Without understanding cost of doing all this. Yes, i can do all and everything you ask for, but each action has a cost, which you fail to understand. We cannot do everything if we need to launch a reliable product.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47830300&quot; title=&quot;Agree with the problem but this list reads like a vent. Communicating effectively is the central problem of all humanity! This vent criticizes developers for not knowing how to listen. that&amp;#39;s why it comes off condescending. The root problem is that people don&amp;#39;t know what they don&amp;#39;t know. The best communicators are translators. People listen because the message becomes self evident in their understanding. It&amp;#39;s hardly a breakdown because everyone is acting like a toddler with their fingers in…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47830422&quot; title=&quot;You assume what they say is the same as what they are thinking The converse is also true. People saying something assume that people listening are understanding and thinking about the same thing. This is why it&amp;#39;s important to write things down in details and as-unambiguous-as-you-can forms. If you&amp;#39;re in a meeting and someone puts up a slide deck with a 6 word bullet point that &amp;#39;explains&amp;#39; what they want, that is a signal that literally no one understands the goal. If they put in a meeting…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mxmap.ch/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2,100 Swiss municipalities showing which provider handles their official email&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mxmap.ch)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47828420&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;118 points · 38 comments · by doener&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An interactive map reveals the email providers used by 2,100 Swiss municipalities as national authorities actively seek to reduce their reliance on Microsoft services. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mxmap.ch/&quot; title=&quot;Related ongoing thread: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Swiss authorities want to reduce dependency on Microsoft&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47827383&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47827383&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a tension between the efficiency of centralized national hosting and the Swiss tradition of local self-determination, which allows 2,100 municipalities to choose their own providers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47828562&quot; title=&quot;TBQH it&amp;#39;s crazy to have 2,100 distinct choices. Why isn&amp;#39;t there a national-level host that frees municipalities from having to think about it?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47828588&quot; title=&quot;Switzerland is apparently a federation of federations. Local self-determination. Amazing place if you ask me would move back there in a heartbeat.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that centralizing critical systems would prevent reliance on &amp;#34;local nerds,&amp;#34; others point out that Switzerland’s decentralized approach—seen also in its disparate education systems—is highly effective in practice &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47829311&quot; title=&quot;You wouldn&amp;#39;t end up contracting with some weird local nerds for critical systems?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47828622&quot; title=&quot;They also (at the cantonal level) have disparate education systems, with classes and grade levels mismatching between neighboring cantons. Yet, if you check what typical Swiss high school students are actually leaning (say at College de Candolle in Geneva), they are learning 3–5 languages, real literary analysis, and set theory. So somehow it’s working despite not having some perfect plan handed down by central authority. Hmm.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters expressed relief that the market isn&amp;#39;t entirely dominated by Google and Microsoft, though there are warnings that self-hosted options may simply be outdated on-premises Exchange servers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47830166&quot; title=&quot;Warms my heart that it is not all divided between Google and Microsoft…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47830354&quot; title=&quot;Be careful, the self-hosted may just be an out-of-date Exchange On-Premises.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-04-18</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-04-18</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://isayeter.com/posts/digitalocean-to-hetzner-migration/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Migrating from DigitalOcean to Hetzner&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (isayeter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815774&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;868 points · 422 comments · by yusufusta&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A software company successfully migrated its production infrastructure from DigitalOcean to Hetzner, reducing monthly costs from $1,432 to $233 while increasing performance and achieving zero downtime through a strategy of MySQL replication, DNS TTL reduction, and Nginx reverse proxying. &lt;a href=&quot;https://isayeter.com/posts/digitalocean-to-hetzner-migration/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Migrating from DigitalOcean to Hetzner: From $1,432 to $233/month With Zero Downtime    URL Source: https://isayeter.com/posts/digitalocean-to-hetzner-migration/    Published Time: 2026-03-17 00:00:00 +0000 UTC    Markdown Content:  _A real-world production migration from DigitalOcean to Hetzner dedicated, handling 248 GB of MySQL data across 30 databases, 34 Nginx sites, GitLab EE, Neo4j, and live mobile app traffic — with zero downtime._    * * *    ## Why We…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users report significant cost savings when migrating from DigitalOcean or AWS to Hetzner, with some leveraging AI tools like Claude Code to automate the complex migration of legacy environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815983&quot; title=&quot;I moved two servers, one from Linode and the other from DO to Hetzner a few months ago, with similar savings. The best part was that the two servers had tens of different sites running, implemented in different languages, with obsolete libraries, MySQL and Redis instances. A total mess. Well: Claude Code migrated it all, sometimes rewriting parts when the libraries where no longer available. Today complex migrations are much simpler to perform, which, I believe, will increase the mobility…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815985&quot; title=&quot;I saved about $1200 a year by moving from AWS to Hetzner. Can’t recommend it enough. AWS has kind of become a scam.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue that these &amp;#34;hyper-aggressive&amp;#34; cost-cutting measures often sacrifice high availability, noting that single-server setups lack the redundancy, live migrations, and managed backups provided by larger cloud platforms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47816808&quot; title=&quot;Every time I see this kind of article, no one really bothers about sb/server redundancy, load balancers, etc. are we ok with just 1 big server that may fail and bring several services down? You saved a lot of money but you&amp;#39;ll spend a lot of time in maintenance and future headaches.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47816006&quot; title=&quot;What are you doing for DB backups? Do you have a replica/standby? Or is it just hourly or something like that? Because with a single-server setup  like this, I&amp;#39;d imagine that hardware (e.g. SSD) failure brings down your app, and in the case of SSD failure, you then have hours or days downtime while you set everything up again.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47816110&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Because with a single-server setup like this, I&amp;#39;d imagine that hardware ... Yeah. This blog post reads like it was written by someone who didn&amp;#39;t think things through and just focused on hyper-agressive cost-cutting. I bet their DigitalOcean vm did live migrations and supported snapshots. You can get that at Hetzner but only in their cloud product. You absolutely will not get that in Hetzner bare-metal. If your HD or other component dies, it dies. Hetzner will replace the HD, but its up to you…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some maintain that lower uptime is acceptable for non-critical &amp;#34;long tail&amp;#34; websites, others express concerns regarding Hetzner&amp;#39;s strict KYC requirements and the potential for AI-driven astroturfing in technical discussions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47816356&quot; title=&quot;AWS only requires a card from me. I tried registering at Hetzner and they wanted a picture of my passport.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47816839&quot; title=&quot;It depends on the service and how critical that website is. Sometimes it&amp;#39;s completely acceptable that a server will run for 10 years with say 1 week or 1 month of downtime spread over those 10 years, yes. That&amp;#39;s the sort of uptime you can see with single servers that are rarely changed and over-provisioned as many on Hetzner are. Some examples: Small businesses where the website is not core to operations and is more of a shop-front or brochure for their business. Hobby websites too don&amp;#39;t really…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47816686&quot; title=&quot;I have just seen with my own eyes Claude astroturfing on a gamedev subreddit from a botting account that was picked up by Google so I could see a few of their other comments. This account&amp;#39;s operation was going on development subs complaining about how good Claude&amp;#39;s latest model is and how awful it is being afraid of losing one&amp;#39;s job to AI. I know your comment is tongue-in-cheek and the poster here is kinda known, but this kind of astroturfing is a new low and it&amp;#39;s everywhere on forums such as…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tokens.billchambers.me/leaderboard&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Anonymous request-token comparisons from Opus 4.6 and Opus 4.7&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tokens.billchambers.me)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47816960&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;605 points · 566 comments · by anabranch&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Community data comparing Anthropic&amp;#39;s Opus 4.6 and 4.7 models shows that version 4.7 averages a 37.1% increase in both token usage and request costs across 463 submissions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tokens.billchambers.me/leaderboard&quot; title=&quot;Title: Tokenomics - Anthropic Token Cost Calculator    URL Source: https://tokens.billchambers.me/leaderboard    Markdown Content:  ## Community Averages    Anonymous request-token comparisons from the community, showing how Opus 4.6 and Opus 4.7 differ on real inputs    Community averages for Opus 4.6 requests vs Opus 4.7 requests 463 submissions    Avg request token change    +37.1%    Avg request cost change    +37.1%    Avg request size    357 / 477    Recent anonymous comparisons (last 50, most recent first)    |…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of Claude Opus 4.7 has sparked debate over its efficiency, with some users reporting significantly faster consumption of usage limits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817737&quot; title=&quot;The bump from 4.6 to 4.7 is not very noticeable to me in improved capabilities so far, but the faster consumption of limits is very noticeable. I hit my 5 hour limit within 2 hours yesterday, initially I was trying the batched mode for a refactor but cancelled after seeing it take 30% of the limit within 5 minutes. Had to cancel and try a serial approach, consumed less (took ~50 minutes, xhigh effort, ~60% of the remaining allocation IIRC), but still very clearly consumed much faster than with…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, while others note that reduced reasoning costs and output token counts may actually make it cheaper for specific workloads &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47818333&quot; title=&quot;For a fair comparison you need to look at the total cost, because 4.7 produces significantly fewer output tokens than 4.6, and seems to cost significantly less on the reasoning side as well. Here is a comparison for 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7 (Output Tokens section): https://artificialanalysis.ai/?models=claude-opus-4-7%2Cclau... 4.7 comes out slightly cheaper than 4.6. But 4.5 is about half the cost: https://artificialanalysis.ai/?models=claude-opus-4-7%2Cclau... Notably the cost of reasoning has been…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. This volatility has led some developers to abandon Claude in favor of open-source models like Qwen to avoid &amp;#34;hard dependencies&amp;#34; on multi-billion dollar companies and the associated costs of proprietary tokens &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817610&quot; title=&quot;We dropped Claude. It&amp;#39;s pretty clear this is a race to the bottom, and we don&amp;#39;t want a hard dependency on another multi-billion dollar company just to write software We&amp;#39;ll be keeping an eye on open models (of which we already make good use of). I think that&amp;#39;s the way forward. Actually it would be great if everybody would put more focus on open models, perhaps we can come up with something like the &amp;#39;linux/postgres/git/http/etc&amp;#39; of the LLMs: something we all can benefit from while it not being…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817622&quot; title=&quot;Any recommendations on good open ones? What are you using primarily?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817648&quot; title=&quot;qwen3.5/3.6 (30B) works well,locally, with opencode&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some fear that heavy AI reliance causes skill atrophy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817640&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;we don&amp;#39;t want a hard dependency on another multi-billion dollar company just to write software One of two main reasons why I&amp;#39;m wary of LLMs. The other is fear of skill atrophy. These two problems compound. Skill atrophy is less bad if the replacement for the previous skill does not depend on a potentially less-than-friendly party.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue it accelerates learning and enables complex infrastructure tasks that would otherwise be impossible &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817714&quot; title=&quot;You can argu that you will have skill atrophy by not using LLMs. We have gone multi cloud disaster recovery on our infrastructure. Something I would not have done yet, had we not had LLMs. I am learning at an incredible rate with LLMs.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817886&quot; title=&quot;I was worried about skill atrophy. I recently started a new job, and from day 1 I&amp;#39;ve been using Claude. 90+% of the code I&amp;#39;ve written has been with Claude. One of the earlier tickets I was given was to update the documentation for one of our pipelines. I used Claude entirely, starting with having it generate a very long and thorough document, then opening up new contexts and getting it to fact check until it stopped finding issues, and then having it cut out anything that was granular/one query…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://worksinprogress.co/issue/why-japan-has-such-good-railways/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why Japan has such good railways&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (worksinprogress.co)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815395&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;553 points · 543 comments · by RickJWagner&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Japan’s world-leading railway success is driven by private vertical integration, liberal zoning that encourages transit-oriented development, and policies that force cars to internalize their costs, rather than unique cultural factors. &lt;a href=&quot;https://worksinprogress.co/issue/why-japan-has-such-good-railways/&quot; title=&quot;Why Japan has such good railways - Works in Progress Magazine    Japan&amp;#39;s railways are the finest in the world. Other countries can copy its formula.    Issues    * [Podcast](https://www.worksinprogress.news/s/podcast)  * [Newsletter](https://www.update.news/)  * [Substack](https://www.worksinprogress.news/)    [Subscribe](/print)    * [Films](/films/)  * [Books in Progress](https://books.worksinprogress.co/)  * [About](/about/)  * [Authors](/our-authors/)  * [Pitch…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Japan&amp;#39;s railway success is attributed to a &amp;#34;city-shaping&amp;#34; economic model where rail companies develop the real estate and commerce surrounding their stations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47816887&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; &amp;#39;I think that though we are a railway company, we consider ourselves a city-shaping company. In Europe for instance, railway companies simply connect cities through their terminals. That is a pretty normal way of operating in this industry, whereas what we do is completely different: we create cities and then, as a utility facility, we add the stations and the railways to connect them one with another.&amp;#39; I think this is it.  The economic model incentivizes rail development.  (Certainly, part…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. This is supported by liberal, nationalized zoning laws that allow for high-density development and prevent local &amp;#34;NIMBY&amp;#34; opposition from stalling infrastructure projects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815744&quot; title=&quot;the railways are excellent, but it&amp;#39;s funny. I was just in Kyoto and saw flyers seemingly at every single temple opposing the Hokuriku Shinkansen extension. apparently this type of opposition has always existed (I looked at the history of trains in Japan and originally most Japanese did NOT want it at all because they thought it looked really ugly), like nimbys in USA, but such decisions are apparently federalized according to some Japanese nationals I spoke to, so the nimbys have no power. USA…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47816375&quot; title=&quot;“Japan’s liberal land use regulation makes it straightforward to build new neighborhoods next to railway lines, giving commuters easy access to city centers. It also enables the densification of these centers, which means that commuters have more places they want to go.” This is the most important paragraph in the article. It can’t be overstated how ingenious Japan’s system of zoning is and how much this has benefitted their society in ways we can only dream about here in the West.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47816399&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;how ingenious Japan’s system of zoning is I&amp;#39;m only barely familiar with it so I ask this in good faith: is it really ingenious or is it just more permissive? My bias/priors are that the simpler and truer statement is: it can&amp;#39;t be overstated how beneficial more permissive zoning laws are to a society.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, Japan discourages car dependency by requiring proof of private parking before vehicle purchase, whereas Western nations often subsidize &amp;#34;free&amp;#34; street parking &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817240&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Japan is one of the only countries to have privatized parking. In Europe and North America, vast quantities of parking space is socialized: municipalities own the streets and allow people to park on them at low or zero cost. Initially with the intention of encouraging the provision of more parking spaces, Japan made it illegal to park on public roads or pavements without special permission. Before someone buys a car, they must prove that they have a reserved night-time space on private land,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue this model is difficult to replicate in the U.S. due to high construction costs, a lack of collective social orientation, and a geography less suited to the linear corridors that make Japanese rail so efficient &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47816186&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s generally regarded that Hong Kong has the best subway in the world.  There are many reasons for this, but one cannot be overstated: Hong Kong&amp;#39;s geography.  A huge portion of the city consists of long thin urban corridors sandwiched between mountains and the sea.  As a result, Hong Kong need concentrate its funding on only a few subway lines to support a huge portion of the population. This good article aside, I wonder if the same thing is true about Japan when we&amp;#39;re talking about…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815804&quot; title=&quot;It can’t work in the US, because it’s not a society that works together for the collective good, or to raise everyone’s quality of life. It’s a bunch of individuals in a dog eat dog situation who happen to live nearby.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47818233&quot; title=&quot;That won’t fix the cost of rail in America, which is the main reason America doesn’t have better rail. Look at California high speed rail or light rail in Seattle. They have insane costs per mile, are still very over budget, falling behind schedule, and basically are forever grifts. The availability of parking is unrelated to these issues. It comes back to mismanagement and corruption.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sentinelcolorado.com/uncategorized/a-college-instructor-turns-to-typewriters-to-curb-ai-written-work-and-teach-life-lessons/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;College instructor turns to typewriters to curb AI-written work&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sentinelcolorado.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47818485&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;466 points · 414 comments · by gnabgib&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Cornell University German instructor is requiring students to use manual typewriters for certain assignments to prevent the use of AI and translation tools while encouraging more intentional, distraction-free writing. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sentinelcolorado.com/uncategorized/a-college-instructor-turns-to-typewriters-to-curb-ai-written-work-and-teach-life-lessons/&quot; title=&quot;Title: A college instructor turns to typewriters to curb AI-written work and teach life lessons    URL Source: https://sentinelcolorado.com/uncategorized/a-college-instructor-turns-to-typewriters-to-curb-ai-written-work-and-teach-life-lessons/    Published Time: 2026-03-31T19:49:53+00:00    Markdown Content:  # A college instructor turns to typewriters to curb AI-written work and teach life lessons - Sentinel Colorado    [![Image 1: Aurora Rotary SOTC 2026…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Educators are increasingly returning to proctored, paper-based exams and handwritten assignments to ensure students possess competence beyond AI prompting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47819796&quot; title=&quot;When I did my Computer Science degree the vast majority of courses were 50% final, 30% midterm - even programming exams were hand written, proctored by TAs in class or in the gymnasium - assignments/labs/projects were a small part of your grade but if you didn’t do them the likelihood you’d pass the term exams was pretty darn low. We already had AI proof education.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47819258&quot; title=&quot;I used to make my classes 60-80% project work, 40-80% quizzes all online. I now do 50% project work, 50% in person quizzes, pencil on paper on page of notes. I&amp;#39;m increasingly going to paper-driven workflows as well, becoming an expert with the department printer, printing computer science papers for students to read and annotate in class, etc. Ironically, the traditional bureaucratic lag in university might actually help: we still have a lot of infrastructure for this sort of thing, and…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47821076&quot; title=&quot;Yeah exactly, I remember having to write Java and C++ by hand in college in the early 2000s. It was also a good test how well you knew the syntax.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that high-stakes exams are artificial and stressful compared to rewarding project work &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47820043&quot; title=&quot;I personally dislike placing a heavy emphasis on exams. Assignments/projects have been consistently the most enjoyable and rewarding parts of the courses I&amp;#39;ve taken so far in university. It&amp;#39;s a shame that they are also way more susceptible to cheating with AI.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47819635&quot; title=&quot;The things I don’t like about putting too much weight in the exams are: * It’s sort of unnecessarily high stakes for the students; a couple hours to determine your grade for many hours of studying. * It’s pretty artificial in general; in “real life” you have the ability to go around online and look for sources. This puts a pretty low ceiling on the level of complexity you can actually throw at them.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that projects have always been susceptible to cheating and are better suited for learning than evaluation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47819433&quot; title=&quot;I always preferred the &amp;#39;you get some grades along the way to gauge your progress but the lion&amp;#39;s share of the weight went to the proctored exams&amp;#39; method unless the lion&amp;#39;s share of the normal work was also proctored anyways (at which point it doesn&amp;#39;t really matter how it&amp;#39;s done). The reason was less for myself and more because anything group related suddenly shot up in quality when the other individual work classmates were graded on couldn&amp;#39;t be fudged.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47820114&quot; title=&quot;Also way more susceptible to cheating in traditional non-AI ways. And your mark ends up depending a lot on how much time you have to invest independent of how good you are at the course material. Assignments and projects are great for learning, but suck for evaluation.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Meanwhile, students report a confusing lack of consensus on AI policy, with some instructors banning the technology entirely while others mandate its use to produce &amp;#34;Ph.D level&amp;#34; work &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47820970&quot; title=&quot;In one of my classes the approach was the opposite, I’m expected to do Ph.D level work as an undergrad and am expected to use AI. In a different one she just said so long as you say AI was used you’re fine to use it. In the rest of them AI is considered cheating. To say we have discrepancies in the rules in an understatement. No one seems to have the exact answer on how to do it. I personally feel like expecting Ph.D level work is the best method as of now, I’ve learned more by using AI to do…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Some skeptics note that even physical mediums like typewriters can be bypassed by simply transcribing AI-generated drafts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47819490&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s interesting is that as I understand, folks are using things like Google Docs for papers, and that it&amp;#39;s (apparently) straight forward to do analysis on a Google Doc to see, well, the life of the document. How it was typed in, how fast, what was pasted and cut back out. My understanding is that the Google Doc is not a word processing document, it&amp;#39;s an event recording of a word processor. So, in theory, you could just &amp;#39;play back&amp;#39;  watching the document being typed in and built to &amp;#39;see&amp;#39; how…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://samhenri.gold/blog/20260418-claude-design/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Thoughts and feelings around Claude Design&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (samhenri.gold)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47818700&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;371 points · 239 comments · by cdrnsf&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sam Henri Gold argues that Claude Design signals a shift back to code as the primary source of truth, threatening Figma’s dominance by bypassing its complex, proprietary systems in favor of direct, agentic HTML and JS implementation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://samhenri.gold/blog/20260418-claude-design/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Thoughts and Feelings around Claude Design · Sam Henri Gold    URL Source: https://samhenri.gold/blog/20260418-claude-design/    Markdown Content:  # Thoughts and Feelings around Claude Design · Sam Henri Gold    ## [Sam Henri Gold](https://samhenri.gold/blog)    ![Image 1: A Figma billboard edited to read: WE HAVE NESTED INSTANCES. WE HAVE BOOLEAN PROPERTIES. WE HAVE A DECADE OF TOOLING AND SOME GUY JUST TOLD A BOT “make an app that does uber but for dogs” AND THE APP JUST. THE APP JUST…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The emergence of Claude Design has sparked a debate over whether front-end development and design are merging into a single role, with some arguing that AI now allows designers to handle debugging and code generation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47819309&quot; title=&quot;Front-end, UX, design, and product have become one role.  The market is just realizing it slowly.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47819387&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been a developer for over 2 decades and I&amp;#39;ve been using AI in our react codebase for the past 3 months. Outside of some optimizations there&amp;#39;s not much a designer couldn&amp;#39;t debug through Claude Code. 90% of the industry is toast. I want to be wrong because I&amp;#39;m watching the death of my entire career, but everything I&amp;#39;ve seen is pointing to this as an inevitability. We are shipping better and more secure code, and doing it easily twice as fast. Many development teams can be cut in half today…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users report impressive results in rapidly deploying UI components &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47819885&quot; title=&quot;I had a similar experience with running out of usage quite quickly, after setting up one design system properly, and then getting pretty close with a second one. But it&amp;#39;s a research preview - I&amp;#39;m sure it will change. I was quite happy with what I pulled off using the first design system: I wanted a new footer section for my IPAAS startup, it generated four options, the fourth of which was quite good. We iterated on it for a bit, then I pulled it into Claude Code (that integrated feature is very…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others criticize the tool as a &amp;#34;plaything&amp;#34; due to restrictive usage limits and the difficulty of matching existing design systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47819716&quot; title=&quot;I used it today to take a look at my previously built design system with Logos, branding, fonts, and everything else. After a lot of annoying tweaking back and forth, finally, I got something that was satisfactory. Then I looked at the usage and it said I had used 95% of my Claude design usage for the week! This isn&amp;#39;t a real tool. This is a plaything, if that&amp;#39;s what they&amp;#39;re providing as examples.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Skeptics maintain that AI-generated &amp;#34;vibe-coded&amp;#34; apps lack the necessary complexity of professional software and that the traditional gap between Figma designs and functional code remains a significant hurdle &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47819721&quot; title=&quot;@kevinsync&amp;#39;s answer is 100% correct and it&amp;#39;s been this way for the last ~~~20? years? at least - only it was &amp;#39;Photoshop files hold the (design) truth&amp;#39; before - now it&amp;#39;s figma. But yes, the &amp;#39;design to code&amp;#39; gap has always been where designers&amp;#39; intentions were butchered and/or where frontend developers would discover/have to deal with designs that didn&amp;#39;t take into account that some strings need more space, or what to do when there are more or less elements in a component, how things should scroll…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47819516&quot; title=&quot;I don’t really buy that Claude Design will remove all the complexity around design. Vibe-coded apps using Claude look simpler because they are simpler. They’re not a gigantic product suite with extremely specific UI components tailored to each use case. The ‘simplicity’ is an illusion coming from conflating the complexity of a bicycle (a vibe coded app) with an airplane (an app like Figma). Building the same design system component in code versus in Figma is going to be slightly more succinct…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kdenlive.org/news/2026/state-2026/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;State of Kdenlive&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (kdenlive.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815118&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;458 points · 145 comments · by f_r_d&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kdenlive’s 2026 state of the project report highlights significant 2025 milestones, including AI-powered background removal and performance boosts, while outlining a 2026 roadmap focused on a new keyframing dopesheet, advanced trimming tools, and an upcoming Microsoft Store release. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kdenlive.org/news/2026/state-2026/&quot; title=&quot;Title: State of Kdenlive - 2026    URL Source: https://kdenlive.org/news/2026/state-2026/    Published Time: 2026-04-18T09:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  # State of Kdenlive - 2026 - Kdenlive  [Skip to content](https://kdenlive.org/news/2026/state-2026/#main)[![Image 1: Logo](https://kdenlive.org/images/logo-colored.svg)](https://kdenlive.org/)    *   [News](https://kdenlive.org/news/)  *   [Downloads](https://kdenlive.org/download/)  *   [About](https://kdenlive.org/news/2026/state-2026/#)[The Story of…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kdenlive is praised for occupying a &amp;#34;sweet spot&amp;#34; between basic tools like iMovie and complex professional suites like DaVinci Resolve, forming a powerful open-source media stack alongside OBS and Audacity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815642&quot; title=&quot;Kdenlive hits the perfect sweet spot for me. It&amp;#39;s much more capable than basic editors like iMovie, but doesn&amp;#39;t have the overwhelming learning curve (or steep hardware requirements) of DaVinci Resolve.  Like others have mentioned, pairing it with OBS for screen recording and Audacity for audio makes for an incredibly powerful, 100% FOSS media creation stack. It&amp;#39;s amazing to see how far open-source video editing has come.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. However, the software faces significant criticism regarding its stability, with some users warning that frequent crashes make it unsuitable for professional work &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815926&quot; title=&quot;Be careful with any serious project, this software most certainly will crash and destroy your work. It crashes since many years and developers do not seem to care or are not able to understand how important stability for media creation software really is. Especially small and independent artists should absolutely avoid any software that introduces additional risk of project failure as one such crash scenario at an advanced project state has a high potential of total destruction. Choose wisely!…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47816246&quot; title=&quot;Kdenlive being crash prone is a known thing, but for the parent to say the devs don&amp;#39;t care goes too far.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue these stability issues are a known hurdle in a long-running project &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47816636&quot; title=&quot;Would it be any better if they cared but still couldn&amp;#39;t tame them in a 25 year old project?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others note that Kdenlive can actually be more reliable than industry standards like Premiere Pro depending on the hardware used &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47816252&quot; title=&quot;For what it&amp;#39;s worth, while I haven&amp;#39;t found kdenlive (or shotcut, based on the same underlying toolkit) to be 100% stable, I&amp;#39;ve had significantly fewer lost-work incidents with kdenlive than I did with Premiere Pro. The frustration of Premiere&amp;#39;s instability was the main thing that drove me to open-source software. I&amp;#39;ve never used Resolve primarily so I don&amp;#39;t have a good feeling of how they compare, but I have experienced a couple of unexpected, mid-work crashes in Resolve as well. I believe…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47816673&quot; title=&quot;Comparing usability/stability of premiere against anything is kind of putting your finger on the scale lol&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Performance regressions in large projects have also been identified, though potential fixes remain unsubmitted due to concerns over the etiquette of providing AI-assisted code contributions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47816003&quot; title=&quot;Kdenlive has some unfortunate performance regression when working with larger projects with many clips. I managed to track down a few of them while evaluating Claude Code a while back (mostly certain actions doing O(n) scans over all clips every mouse event needing debouncing), and got it mostly back down to tolerable levels again, but have been holding onto them because unsolicited drive by AI PRs are very annoying from a code project maintenance perspective, as the changes are almost…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2026/04/any-color-you-nist-scientists-create-any-wavelength-lasers-tiny-circuits&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;NIST scientists create &amp;#39;any wavelength&amp;#39; lasers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nist.gov)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47819453&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;414 points · 186 comments · by rbanffy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NIST scientists have developed a new method for creating integrated photonic chips that can generate a full rainbow of laser colors, a breakthrough that could miniaturize bulky laser systems for use in quantum computers, optical atomic clocks, and artificial intelligence. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2026/04/any-color-you-nist-scientists-create-any-wavelength-lasers-tiny-circuits&quot; title=&quot;Title: Any Color You Like: NIST Scientists Create ‘Any Wavelength’ Lasers in Tiny Circuits for Light    URL Source: https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2026/04/any-color-you-nist-scientists-create-any-wavelength-lasers-tiny-circuits    Published Time: 2026-04-15T08:00-04:00    Markdown Content:  # Any Color You Like: NIST Scientists Create ‘Any Wavelength’ Lasers in Tiny Circuits for Light | NIST  [Skip to main…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the distinction between physical light frequencies and the subjective human perception of color, noting that &amp;#34;magenta&amp;#34; is a brain-constructed sensation rather than a single wavelength &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47820453&quot; title=&quot;The whole idea of colour and light frequency is fascinating. These are just frequencies of light, but the subjective experience of them is so much more. And the whole thing of my perception of &amp;#39;red&amp;#39; or what I call &amp;#39;red&amp;#39; could be very different to someone else&amp;#39;s subjective perception. But we would both call it red and associate it with the same thing, fire, love, heat, danger etc.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47820658&quot; title=&quot;I think it&amp;#39;s important to remember that we&amp;#39;re not perceiving some fundamental aspect of light. We&amp;#39;re perceiving how the photosensitive portions of our retina convert light to stimulus, and how our brains construct a meaningful image from that stimulus in our mind. Like film photography doesn&amp;#39;t happen in the lens or the world. It happens in that photosensitive chemical reaction, and the decision of the photographer.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47820104&quot; title=&quot;What we call &amp;#39;magenta&amp;#39; is the sensation of both red and blue color-sensitive cells in the eye being excited at the same time. There&amp;#39;s no single wavelength that produces this effect (unlike e.g. yellow). The closes you can get is violet, which looks faint to the eye. A rainbow gives you both red and blue; mute everything else, and you&amp;#39;ll get magenta. That&amp;#39;s what magenta pigments do when illuminated by white light (which is a rainbow scrambled).&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users explore the linguistic history of colors and the possibility of &amp;#34;illusory&amp;#34; hues, others question the practical applications of this laser technology for photonic computing or precision melting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47820262&quot; title=&quot;Everyone talking about magenta and brown, but you can see an illusory color right now even without lasers! https://dynomight.net/colors/ behold, some kind of hyper-turquoise&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47819924&quot; title=&quot;Is there a single person here interested in photonic computing that wants to explain to the class if there&amp;#39;s any &amp;#39;there&amp;#39; there?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47820487&quot; title=&quot;But also - colours don&amp;#39;t exist without a name eg. Before Orange, there was only shades of yellow or reds&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47820028&quot; title=&quot;can they do microwave? if you do the exact right color you can make certain things melt very precisely.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a specific fascination with how the eye interprets non-spectral colors, with explanations on how to simulate magenta by isolating red and blue from the rainbow &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47820056&quot; title=&quot;Genuine q: how close can you get to magenta with the rainbow?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47820104&quot; title=&quot;What we call &amp;#39;magenta&amp;#39; is the sensation of both red and blue color-sensitive cells in the eye being excited at the same time. There&amp;#39;s no single wavelength that produces this effect (unlike e.g. yellow). The closes you can get is violet, which looks faint to the eye. A rainbow gives you both red and blue; mute everything else, and you&amp;#39;ll get magenta. That&amp;#39;s what magenta pigments do when illuminated by white light (which is a rainbow scrambled).&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/apr/18/iran-war-bets-ethics-concerns&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Traders placed over $1B in perfectly timed bets on the Iran war&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theguardian.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47818305&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;348 points · 233 comments · by trocado&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lawmakers and regulators are investigating suspicious trades exceeding $1 billion on prediction markets and oil futures that perfectly anticipated major military and political developments in the US-Israel war with Iran. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/apr/18/iran-war-bets-ethics-concerns&quot; title=&quot;Traders placed over $1bn in perfectly timed bets on the Iran war. What is going on?    Suspicious wagers on the US-Israel war in Iran are creating huge windfalls and raising concerns among lawmakers    [Skip to main content](#maincontent)[Skip to navigation](#navigation)    Close dialogue1/1Next imagePrevious imageToggle caption    [Skip to navigation](#navigation)    [Print…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the belief that prediction markets are inherently rigged in favor of insiders, making participation by the general public a &amp;#34;tax on being stupid&amp;#34; or a form of gambling addiction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47818861&quot; title=&quot;You&amp;#39;d have to be spectacularly stupid to bet on these kinds of things without having insider knowledge, because you ought to know good and damn well by now that the people with insider knowledge are DEFINITELY betting on them.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47820431&quot; title=&quot;The current setup does sort of seem like a tax on being stupid. Why would any non-insider participate in these markets? You’re just asking to get screwed. Though it’s not that different from the stock market, where the folks at WSB happily give their money to Citadel, Jane Street, and friends, because every once a while, one of them hits it big after going all in that the ball lands on green. Gambling is a hell of a drug and there are good reasons why it is illegal in so many places. Prediction…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47818995&quot; title=&quot;Prediction Markets require insider trading to function... how do people not know this? It&amp;#39;s a setup from day one. If you have the knowledge, you&amp;#39;re going to cash in, if you don&amp;#39;t have the knowledge, you are throwing your money away.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters argue that these platforms erode the social contract by signaling that ethical work is for &amp;#34;stooges&amp;#34; while those in power profit freely from non-public information &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47820129&quot; title=&quot;Say whatever you want about the merits of prediction markets.  But I just don&amp;#39;t see a way those benefits outweigh the societal dangers of these constant reminders that people in or close to power can freely profit from their positions in the ways the rest of the population can&amp;#39;t.  There&amp;#39;s always talk about the dangers of disincentivizing job creators, but what happens when a society routinely disincentives job havers in this way?  We&amp;#39;re just getting a constant barrage of information telling us…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47818425&quot; title=&quot;Yet more evidence of the rapid disassembly of the social contract and our collective ethics, aided of course by unregulated tech. If you work for – or are involved in the funding of – these unregulated gambling and insider trading platforms, you should be ashamed of yourself. Your greed and lack of concern for the health of the human world you live in is sickening. You can get bag after bag but it will never fill the void in your soul.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest that the resulting price signals provide valuable public information or function like traditional commodity hedging, others warn that the lack of regulation and the potential for &amp;#34;assassination markets&amp;#34; will eventually lead to bans &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47818822&quot; title=&quot;What value do prediction markets give to anyone not in the insider trading class? I predict these will be banned when someone finally uses them as an &amp;#39;assassination market&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47820178&quot; title=&quot;The oil trade structure actually does make sense, because this is how you buy oil, or really any commodity that takes so much space and weight. You order it ahead of time, then if you hold till the contract settles you are allowed to pick it up from the place and in the way designated in the contract specification. In fact you are obliged to pick it up, that&amp;#39;s why prices can go negative in exceptional situations. Prediction markets are then just a clean cash-only derivative. Most of the other…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.righto.com/2026/04/B-52-star-tracker-angle-computer.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The electromechanical angle computer inside the B-52 bomber&amp;#39;s star tracker&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (righto.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817132&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;417 points · 111 comments · by NelsonMinar&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The B-52 bomber&amp;#39;s Angle Computer is a 1960s electromechanical analog system that solved complex spherical trigonometry for celestial navigation. By physically modeling the celestial sphere with gears and motors, it converted star positions into local coordinates to provide accurate heading and location data without GPS. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.righto.com/2026/04/B-52-star-tracker-angle-computer.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: The electromechanical angle computer inside the B-52 bomber&amp;#39;s star tracker    URL Source: https://www.righto.com/2026/04/B-52-star-tracker-angle-computer.html    Published Time: Sun, 19 Apr 2026 04:11:46 GMT    Markdown Content:  # The electromechanical angle computer inside the B-52 bomber&amp;#39;s star tracker    # [Ken Shirriff&amp;#39;s blog](https://www.righto.com/)    Computer history, restoring vintage computers, IC reverse engineering, and…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The B-52’s star tracker utilized a sophisticated electromechanical spiral search mechanism to automatically locate and lock onto stars, a significant advancement over the manual tracking required in the Apollo program &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817685&quot; title=&quot;The device has a spiral search mechanism to find the star. Then it locked onto the star and automatically tracked it. So this was unlike the Apollo star tracker where the astronaut has to manually aim at the star.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47818381&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ll probably write another article on the star tracker itself. But I can give you a quick summary of the spiral search mechanism. It was electromechanical: a motor turned a resolver, a device with coils to generate sine and cosine from the shaft angle. This gives the X and Y deflections for a circle. These signals went through potentiometers that were also turned by the motor to produce constantly growing magnitudes, so you get a spiral. But you need to slow down the motor as you spiral…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. This technology evolved from naval &amp;#34;fire control tables,&amp;#34; representing a peak era of mechanical computation where complex inputs were processed through gears, cams, and resolvers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47819526&quot; title=&quot;This is from the era of devices where the I/O was entirely electrical but the computation was mechanical. Most of this stuff came from naval gunnery. The naval &amp;#39;fire control tables&amp;#39; started out as mechanical computers where a rather large number of people were inputting different sensor readings via cranks and dials.[1] Gradually, more of the inputs came in directly from the sensors, and more of the outputs went directly to the gun turrets. The final form of this technology was units the size…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters express nostalgia for the tangible engineering challenges of that era compared to modern software tasks, others highlight the grim historical context of these devices being used for devastating bombing campaigns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817962&quot; title=&quot;Everytime I read articles like that, I envy the engineers that worked in development of such tools. First microprocessors in jet fighters, electromechanical celestial navigation... And here I am fighting gitlab pipelines.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47818052&quot; title=&quot;Nothing is stopping us. One life to experience the universe. Save up for a sabbatical. Find new engineering pastures. It&amp;#39;s always rose colored looking back. Not everybody got to work on this. Some people were storming the beaches...&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47818200&quot; title=&quot;And some people, specifically Vietnamese and Cambodian civilians, were on the receiving end of your fun little brain teaser. And other people, like Henry Kissinger, drew random dots on a map to tell it where to drop the bombs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Menu&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bigthink.com/mind-behavior/the-quiet-disappearance-of-the-free-range-childhood/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The quiet disappearance of the free-range childhood&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bigthink.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815127&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;252 points · &lt;strong&gt;271 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by sylvainkalache&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A movement for &amp;#34;reasonable childhood independence&amp;#34; is pushing back against vague neglect laws and a culture of constant supervision, arguing that overprotection hinders children&amp;#39;s resilience despite historically low risks of stranger abduction and falling crime rates. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bigthink.com/mind-behavior/the-quiet-disappearance-of-the-free-range-childhood/&quot; title=&quot;The quiet disappearance of the free-range childhood    When can a kid play outside alone? Two parents, one stranger, and the state collide.    # The quiet disappearance of the free-range childhood    [Big Think Home    xml version=&amp;#39;1.0&amp;#39; encoding=&amp;#39;UTF-8&amp;#39;?    xml version=&amp;#39;1.0&amp;#39; encoding=&amp;#39;UTF-8&amp;#39;?](https://bigthink.com/)    Open search    xml version=&amp;#39;1.0&amp;#39; encoding=&amp;#39;UTF-8&amp;#39;?    Open main menu    * [xml version=&amp;#39;1.0&amp;#39; encoding=&amp;#39;UTF-8&amp;#39;?      Search](https://bigthink.com/)      What are you curious about?      xml version=&amp;#39;1.0&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some argue that suburban children still play unsupervised, others contend that modern &amp;#34;free-range&amp;#34; childhood is a shadow of its former self, restricted by car-centric infrastructure and a lack of transit access &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815346&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know. Maybe this is going away in some places, maybe I just have my own anecdata, but my kids play outside unsupervised all the time, as do all the kids in my neighborhood. I live in just a regular suburban neighborhood on the outskirts of small Metro. Nothing special about it at all. Every time I see one of these articles I always wonder who they&amp;#39;re talking about. I always feel like this is just one of those news headlines that won&amp;#39;t go away, but isn&amp;#39;t quite tethered to reality, but…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815650&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; my kids play outside unsupervised all the time, as do all the kids in my neighborhood. I live in just a regular suburban neighborhood Your kids are hardly free-range. Let me guess, there&amp;#39;s no way for them to actually meaningfully leave the area (no train, bus, etc)? It&amp;#39;s like dumping kids on a 5 acre farm and saying they can do whatever they want. hardly free-range in the way described in the article. Presumably you live in a suburb for the reasons the person in the article checked in on the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815693&quot; title=&quot;The usual contrast being drawn is kids wandering around a suburban area, walking to school, playing with kids in a nearby rural property. It&amp;#39;s not hopping onto a bus to the city a few tens of miles away. You do see schoolchildren in Japan on the train by themselves but I&amp;#39;m not sure that&amp;#39;s ever been very common in the US.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. A primary obstacle is the &amp;#34;empty street&amp;#34; problem: because screens and overprotective parenting keep most children indoors, parents who want to encourage independence find no peer group for their children to join &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815346&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know. Maybe this is going away in some places, maybe I just have my own anecdata, but my kids play outside unsupervised all the time, as do all the kids in my neighborhood. I live in just a regular suburban neighborhood on the outskirts of small Metro. Nothing special about it at all. Every time I see one of these articles I always wonder who they&amp;#39;re talking about. I always feel like this is just one of those news headlines that won&amp;#39;t go away, but isn&amp;#39;t quite tethered to reality, but…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815503&quot; title=&quot;This behavior is probably overrepresented in the bougie places reporters live. I dropped my daughter off at the mall to hang out with their friends and one of the moms followed them around the whole time. They&amp;#39;re all 13!&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815817&quot; title=&quot;I have a 10 year old boy and I&amp;#39;m facing these issues right now.  I&amp;#39;m also in Canada so culturally adjacent to the US and similar enough with regards to this topic. I don&amp;#39;t see child welfare agencies personally as a particular threat when it comes to this topic.  Maybe they ARE more likely to get involved in cases of more free range parenting where before they weren&amp;#39;t, but it doesn&amp;#39;t register as a real worry. The major difference I see between when I was growing up and now is that when I went…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While safety concerns regarding crime are often dismissed as &amp;#34;FUD,&amp;#34; the physical danger of traffic and the social pressure of helicopter parenting remain significant barriers to letting children explore alone &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815650&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; my kids play outside unsupervised all the time, as do all the kids in my neighborhood. I live in just a regular suburban neighborhood Your kids are hardly free-range. Let me guess, there&amp;#39;s no way for them to actually meaningfully leave the area (no train, bus, etc)? It&amp;#39;s like dumping kids on a 5 acre farm and saying they can do whatever they want. hardly free-range in the way described in the article. Presumably you live in a suburb for the reasons the person in the article checked in on the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815528&quot; title=&quot;My biggest fear of letting my young kid play alone outside is getting hit by a car.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815503&quot; title=&quot;This behavior is probably overrepresented in the bougie places reporters live. I dropped my daughter off at the mall to hang out with their friends and one of the moms followed them around the whole time. They&amp;#39;re all 13!&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815817&quot; title=&quot;I have a 10 year old boy and I&amp;#39;m facing these issues right now.  I&amp;#39;m also in Canada so culturally adjacent to the US and similar enough with regards to this topic. I don&amp;#39;t see child welfare agencies personally as a particular threat when it comes to this topic.  Maybe they ARE more likely to get involved in cases of more free range parenting where before they weren&amp;#39;t, but it doesn&amp;#39;t register as a real worry. The major difference I see between when I was growing up and now is that when I went…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/becarpenter/misc/blob/main/why6why.md&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why is IPv6 so complicated?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47813631&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;121 points · &lt;strong&gt;238 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by signa11&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IPv6 is more complex than IPv4 because expanding address sizes necessitates a new protocol, requiring inevitable coexistence and translation mechanisms that would affect any successor, while its design also incorporated modern features to compete with historical alternatives like OSI and proprietary protocols. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/becarpenter/misc/blob/main/why6why.md&quot; title=&quot;Title: misc/why6why.md at main · becarpenter/misc    URL Source: https://github.com/becarpenter/misc/blob/main/why6why.md    Markdown Content:  ## Why is IPv6 so complicated?    [](https://github.com/becarpenter/misc/blob/main/why6why.md#why-is-ipv6-so-complicated)  There&amp;#39;s no question that IPv6 is more complicated than IPv4, and people sometimes ask why that is. Surely it would have been much simpler to just add an extra 32 bits to the IPv4 address, and change nothing else? In fact, every year or two…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Critics argue that IPv6&amp;#39;s slow adoption stems from a design that discarded the simplicity of IPv4 in favor of complex features like SLAAC, hex-based addresses, and multiple concurrent IP assignments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47813940&quot; title=&quot;This annoys me, especially the last “It takes at least 25 years” rhetoric. It didn’t take 25 years for SSL. SSH. Gzip encoding on HTTP pages. QUIC. Web to replace NNTP.   GPRS/HSDPA/3G/4G/5G  They all rolled out just fine and were pretty backwards and forwards compatible with each other. The whole SLAAC/DHCPv6/RA thing is a total clusterfuck. I’m sure there’s many reasons that’s the case but my god. What does your ISP support? Good luck. We need IPv6 we really do. But it seems to this day the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47813943&quot; title=&quot;if it was easier to use and less of a PITA, it wouldn&amp;#39;t be taking decades.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814011&quot; title=&quot;I recently had to set up basic IP-based country detection in Nginx for a project. Parsing and handling IPv4 is trivial. The second I had to account for IPv6 string formats and update the Geo databases to match, the complexity just spiked for no good reason. It feels like we traded address exhaustion for parsing nightmares.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some maintain that IPv6 is &amp;#34;extremely easy&amp;#34; if users stop trying to micromanage configurations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47813962&quot; title=&quot;If anything, IPv6 is extremely easy to use, especially with SLAAC: On any kind of standard network, you turn on IPv6 on your machine, and, given physical connectivity, bam! You&amp;#39;re on the internet. It only gets complex if you try to micro-manage it.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814022&quot; title=&quot;There are no more acronyms. SLAAC means automatic client configuration. That&amp;#39;s the only one you need. &amp;gt; give up control of your home network. What does that even mean? What do you gain by deciding your Apple TV should be at 192.168.0.3? With IPv6, you can just `ping appletv` and it works fine. What more &amp;#39;control&amp;#39; do you need?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that this automation fails in non-trivial home networks and lacks a viable solution for dual-WAN failover &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814008&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; especially with SLAAC Oh no, last time I asked on HN I got 24 to 48 easy steps involving a lot more acronyms than this (please don&amp;#39;t repeat them). IPv6 is easy to use only if you let your one router manage everything and you give up control of your home network. Edit: again, please don&amp;#39;t help. There have been HNers trying to help before, but my home network is non trivial and all the &amp;#39;easy&amp;#39; autoconfiguration actually gets in the way.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814249&quot; title=&quot;There is no working solution to ipv6 dual WAN failover, 30 years later... A critical design flaw that was simply ignored by the designers despite being used in almost any SME network. inb4 no you can&amp;#39;t have all lan devices have multiple ipv6 addresses and choose for themselves, typically 1 WAN is cheap and the second WAN is expensive/slow and should be used only for WAN1 failover Inb4 no you can&amp;#39;t just advertise new RA, devices on lan can takes minutes to update. On ipv4, NAT+changing route on…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant point of contention is the loss of NAT; while technically not a security feature, its absence makes security models harder to explain to decision-makers and increases anxiety regarding firewall robustness &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814029&quot; title=&quot;My first IPv6 implementation was in 2010-2011 (memory a but fuzzy). Carriers supporting BGP over IPv6 were few, websites over IPv6 were also scarce. Fast forward 15 years snd the situation has improved quite dramatically. IPv6 has some quirks that make it harder to digest. - link local gateway address, makes it hard to understand why the subnet does not have a gateway from the ssme address space - privacy extensions: it is very hard to explain to people why they have 3-4 IPv6 addresses assigned…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814074&quot; title=&quot;The nice thing about NAT is it makes the security model easier to reason about. By this, I don’t mean it’s more secure, because I know it isn’t. But it is a lot easier to see and to explain what has access to what. And the problem with enterprise is that 80% of the work is explaining to other people, usually non-technical or pseudo-technical decision makers, why your design is safe. I really do think IPv6 missed a trick by not offering that.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814077&quot; title=&quot;I mean generally I want fixed IPs on my local network for robustness. With IPv6 I actually want it more and it becomes possible since we can just use the MAC address as an IP address. I have IPv6 service at my ISP right now but I&amp;#39;m hesitant to turn it on on my local network because it does make my firewalling concerns much more critical.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://victorpoughon.github.io/interval-calculator/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: I made a calculator that works over disjoint sets of intervals&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (victorpoughon.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47812341&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;308 points · 51 comments · by fouronnes3&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This open-source TypeScript calculator implements interval union arithmetic to accurately handle non-continuous functions and division by zero by representing results as sets of disjoint intervals. &lt;a href=&quot;https://victorpoughon.github.io/interval-calculator/&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;amp;#x27;ve been studying interval arithmetic for the past few weeks and it&amp;amp;#x27;s a really interesting field because while there is a ton of super interesting research published over the past decades, it has never really gotten the recognition that it deserves, IMO.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;One reason for this is that standard interval arithmetic has really poor handling of division by intervals containing zero. If you compute 1 &amp;amp;#x2F; [-1, 2] in regular interval arithmetic, you get either [-∞, +∞], or you have to say…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author created this calculator to test an implementation of interval union arithmetic for a &amp;#34;backwards updating spreadsheet,&amp;#34; highlighting that the &amp;#34;inclusion property&amp;#34; allows for operations like a true inverse of the square function &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47812435&quot; title=&quot;Author here. Outward rounding to combat precision issues is what interval arithmetic is most known for (try 0.1+0.2 with &amp;#39;full precision mode&amp;#39; enabled), but that&amp;#39;s really a shame in my opinion. Outward rounding is cool, but the &amp;#39;inclusion property&amp;#39;, as it&amp;#39;s known in research papers, works at every scale! This is what enables things like: 50 * (10 + [-1, 1])      [450, 550] which is lovely, I think. Adding the union layer to it enables even cooler things, like the true inverse of the square…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Users discussed practical applications ranging from static analysis and type checking to detecting unreachable code branches &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47813869&quot; title=&quot;It can be used in static analysis or type checking. E.g. if (x &amp;gt;= 0) {        x += 10        if (x =&amp;lt; 9) {          // unreachable         }      } By maintaining an interval of possible values of x, you can detect the unreachable branch, because the interval becomes empty: initial: [-oo, oo]      x &amp;gt;= 0 : [0, oo]      x += 10: [10, oo]      x =&amp;lt; 9 : [10, 9] (empty)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a debate regarding notation: while some prefer round brackets for open intervals, others advocate for outward-facing brackets (e.g., `]0, 1[`) to avoid ambiguity with 2D vectors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47813477&quot; title=&quot;Very nice, thanks for sharing!  Maybe show which upper or lower values are included in the intervals?  A notation I am familiar with uses outward facing brackets if the value is not included in the interval. That always applies to infinity. Applied to the cases here: ]-∞, -1] U [0.5, +∞[ The excluded interval in between becomes ]-1, 0.5[ then. That’s how min (and analogously max) works, right?  min(A, B) = [lo(A,B), lo (hi(A), hi(B))]. Edit: idea: copy a formula from the results section to the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47813577&quot; title=&quot;I was also a bit confused by this. I thought the standard notation was round brackets, but maybe doesn&amp;#39;t work well in ASCII?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814138&quot; title=&quot;(0, 1) Is this an twice-open interval or a 2D vector? See, this is why Bourbaki introduced the ]0,1[ notation.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Other developers shared similar projects, such as graphing calculators built on interval arithmetic, and inquired how the implementation aligns with the IEEE 1788 standard &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47813659&quot; title=&quot;Excellent!! I love interval arithmetic and also wrote a TS implementation for a graphing calculator project. Agree that it&amp;#39;s very underrated, and I wish that directed rounding was exposed in more languages.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814438&quot; title=&quot;Nice! I am interested in how the arithmetic you implemented differs from the IEEE 1788 Standard for Interval Arithmetic (and how the two linked papers relate to it). To address the challenges you mention, did you have to start from scratch or was it something that can build on top of the IEEE standard?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47813354&quot; title=&quot;You might be interested in this graphing calculator I made using interval arithmetic: https://memalign.github.io/m/formulagraph/index.html Some detail on how this works, including links to the relevant interval math code: https://memalign.github.io/p/formulagraph.html&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://science.nasa.gov/blogs/voyager/2026/04/17/nasa-shuts-off-instrument-on-voyager-1-to-keep-spacecraft-operating/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;NASA Shuts Off Instrument on Voyager 1 to Keep Spacecraft Operating&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (science.nasa.gov)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47820531&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;227 points · 111 comments · by sohkamyung&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NASA engineers have shut down Voyager 1&amp;#39;s Low-energy Charged Particles experiment to conserve the spacecraft&amp;#39;s dwindling power and extend its mission. This move provides about a year of operational buffer while the team prepares a more complex energy-saving plan to keep the remaining instruments functioning. &lt;a href=&quot;https://science.nasa.gov/blogs/voyager/2026/04/17/nasa-shuts-off-instrument-on-voyager-1-to-keep-spacecraft-operating/&quot; title=&quot;Title: NASA Shuts Off Instrument on Voyager 1 to Keep Spacecraft Operating - NASA Science    URL Source: https://science.nasa.gov/blogs/voyager/2026/04/17/nasa-shuts-off-instrument-on-voyager-1-to-keep-spacecraft-operating/    Published Time: 2026-04-17T16:46:56-04:00    Markdown Content:  # NASA Shuts Off Instrument on Voyager 1 to Keep Spacecraft Operating - NASA Science    [![Image 1: NASA…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The gradual shutdown of Voyager 1’s instruments highlights a lack of modern deep-space successors, leading some to criticize the shift toward &amp;#34;prestige&amp;#34; space telescopes over long-range probes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47821387&quot; title=&quot;It continues to irritate me that There aren&amp;#39;t any other functioning deep space probes besides New Horizons (launched in 2006, and which flies at a slower speed than Voyagers). One new operating deep space probe in nearly 50 years is just embarrassing. I mean yay space telescopes and everything, but we seem to have given up anything that isn&amp;#39;t a state-of-the-art prestige project. I was hopeful about projects like Breakthrough starshot but that seems to have stalled:…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users question the current scientific value of the aging craft &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47820891&quot; title=&quot;Curious, has Voyager 1 brought in any data in recent years that is scientifically meaningful? Not to put down the efforts of keeping it alive, I love that. Just wonder how much of its task is &amp;#39;done&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others note that the unique planetary alignment used for Voyager&amp;#39;s speed only occurs every 175 years, making it difficult to replicate such missions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47821543&quot; title=&quot;Isn&amp;#39;t a big part of the problem that the voyager slingshot is one of the best you can get, and it&amp;#39;s a once in multiple-lifetimes event? Even if we launch a new deep space probe as best we can they&amp;#39;re gonna be real slow?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47821380&quot; title=&quot;The planetary alignment that allowed the Voyager probes to move so fast only occurs every 175 years.  Even with this advantage it took them 12 years to get to Neptune.  So the short answer is no.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the technical challenges of extreme communication latency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47820771&quot; title=&quot;Imagine deploying your bug fix and having to wait two days to find out if it worked!&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, the probes remain a source of significant emotional attachment as they approach their inevitable end &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47821014&quot; title=&quot;I think there’s going to be more than a few people feeling a little emotional when the days that the Voyagers go dark come. What magnificent machines.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47821105&quot; title=&quot;I hope not to see that day&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20260417-fatherhood-how-the-male-brain-and-body-prepare-for-childcare&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Dad brains: How fatherhood rewires the male mind&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47820046&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;166 points · 172 comments · by tchalla&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scientific research reveals that fatherhood triggers significant hormonal and neural changes in men, such as decreased testosterone and increased oxytocin, which biologically prime them for nurturing and protective caregiving. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20260417-fatherhood-how-the-male-brain-and-body-prepare-for-childcare&quot; title=&quot;Title: Dad brains: How fatherhood rewires the male mind    URL Source: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20260417-fatherhood-how-the-male-brain-and-body-prepare-for-childcare    Published Time: 2026-04-18T09:01:03.762Z    Markdown Content:  20 hours ago    Diego Arguedas Ortiz    ![Image 1: Serenity Strull/ BBC An illustration of a man cradling a home in his arms (Credit: Serenity Strull/ BBC)](https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/images/ic/480xn/p0nf1yp8.jpg.webp)Serenity Strull/ BBC    (Credit: Serenity Strull/…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion reflects a sharp divide between those who view the biological &amp;#34;rewiring&amp;#34; of fathers as a flawed, ideological narrative and those who find it validates their personal experiences. Critics argue the research unfairly pathologizes traditional masculinity and high testosterone &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47820710&quot; title=&quot;Saw this earlier today, I think it’s very flawed and ideological, unfortunately other posts mentioning this got flagged. First there’s the idea that “nurturing” is somehow what kids need and better for them automatically, that whatever a stereotypical man does with kids is bad for them, and we need to be rewired by pheromones or whatever to be more sensitive.   And as a corollary the idea that a high-T man somehow is a worse caregiver, and that it needs to be reigned in by some adaptation.  The…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, suggesting that modern intensive parenting may even be &amp;#34;unnatural&amp;#34; or contrary to evolutionary instincts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47821082&quot; title=&quot;It’s probably unnatural for adult men to spend much time with tiny children in the first place. Here and there, sure, and boys close to adult age, definitely, but nothing like what happens today. This is why many men find it difficult, it is contrary to instinct. Do hunter gatherers split care of tiny children? Whatever they do is what we’re wired for, mostly.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47821851&quot; title=&quot;Four things are needed. Stereotypically they&amp;#39;re divided   Dad: Protect and provide  Mom: Nurture and nourish You could do it differently, but that only works if you swap one, not share half half. Both have been eroded. Kids are raised by strangers, our food is crap, you can&amp;#39;t warn each other about dangers cause that&amp;#39;s somehow an insult and a single income doesn&amp;#39;t pay the bills. The goal seems to be to set men and women against each other.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, several fathers report profound shifts in sensitivity and emotionality, citing anecdotes of increased auditory awareness &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47820642&quot; title=&quot;I swear my hearing got more sensitive with kids. Also, some commercials hit differently.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt; and intense oxytocin-driven bonding that aligns with the article&amp;#39;s findings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47820755&quot; title=&quot;I find it very odd that the rest of the comments are sort of... not agreeing with the findings in the article. I became a father recently (:D) and it&amp;#39;s been an emotional rollercoaster for me. I had been frantically Googling my &amp;#39;symptoms&amp;#39; and asking around what&amp;#39;s wrong with me, because it seems I&amp;#39;ve been quite sensitive since the birth of my baby. One way to explain this is the Gordon Ramsay meme ( https://imgflip.com/memetemplate/211147137/Oh-dear-dear-gorg... , LHS = my reaction to my baby,…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47820370&quot; title=&quot;As a father of 3 daughters now approaching 50 with my oldest now 24 … I will say that I believe some of this is true.  Perhaps it is just the life altering effect of raising children or maybe is biological as well.  You can definitely pickup on whether another male is a father or not.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Some commenters also propose alternative explanations for the observed biological changes, such as the physiological impact of extreme sleep deprivation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47820811&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; And the men that had spent longer looking after babies showed the largest drops in testosterone. Those that shared a bed with their infants also had lower levels. Dad here. Maybe…it’s the lack of sleep? Involved fathers tend to have less sleep.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://amiga.lychesis.net/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Amiga Graphics Archive&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (amiga.lychesis.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47813566&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;257 points · 79 comments · by sph&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Amiga Graphics Archive is a digital repository dedicated to preserving pixel art, logos, and animations created for the Commodore Amiga. The site features categorized collections from games, applications, and magazines, alongside technical articles on the computer&amp;#39;s unique custom chips and display technologies. &lt;a href=&quot;https://amiga.lychesis.net/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Amiga Graphics Archive    URL Source: https://amiga.lychesis.net/    Published Time: Sun, 12 Apr 2026 07:37:16 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Amiga Graphics Archive  [Amiga Graphics Archive](https://amiga.lychesis.net/index.html)[TFT](https://amiga.lychesis.net/index.crt.html)[About](https://amiga.lychesis.net/articles/About.html)[Links](https://amiga.lychesis.net/articles/Links.html)    ![Image 1: Park_AdmiralKirk](https://amiga.lychesis.net/assets/Park/Park_AdmiralKirk.png)    ![Image 2:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Amiga’s architectural classification is a point of contention, with some arguing it was a &amp;#34;full-on 32-bit machine&amp;#34; due to its flat address space and 32-bit registers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817125&quot; title=&quot;A super minor nitpick: it’s jarring to see the Amiga referred to as 16 bit. It wasn’t described that way at the time: it was universally (that I saw anyway) called a 32 bit machine, and reasonably. It had a flat 32 bit address space (although the 68000 itself didn’t support all those address lines because what kind of supercomputer would need 4GB of RAM?). All the registers and operations were 32 bit. Some of the internal operations were implemented in 16 bits, but that was invisible to…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, while others maintain it was 16-bit or &amp;#34;16/32-bit&amp;#34; because of its 16-bit data bus and 24-bit address bus &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47819459&quot; title=&quot;While the 68000&amp;#39;s registers are 32-bit, the data bus is 16 bit, the A1000, A2000 and A500 that defined the range had 16-bit fetching chipsets, they literally had 24-bit address buses. None of this says &amp;#39;32-bit&amp;#39;. It can&amp;#39;t be overlooked. Many games crashed on the 32-bit clean A3000, A1200, A600, A4000 because programmers used the upper byte of addresses for their IQ or whatever. (Similar issues with ARM2 to ARM3 in Acorns, even RISC OS itself can be categorized into &amp;#39;26-bit&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;32-bit clean&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817291&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, I second that 16 bit or 16/32 was far more commonly used than 32, due to the 16 bit bus.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Users fondly recall the platform&amp;#39;s unique aesthetic, characterized by chunky fonts, strong gradients, and the &amp;#34;Hold-And-Modify&amp;#34; (HAM) mode that allowed for 4,096 simultaneous colors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814927&quot; title=&quot;There’s something about the Amiga era font and graphic style that I love and I always feel is unique to the Amiga but had trouble pinning it down to a particular developer or graphics artist. Ruff n Tumble is a good example, with like chunky futuristic font, the strong gradients all over everything and even the colours. It’s not common to all games though.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815465&quot; title=&quot;This is great stuff! As a side note, I wonder if anyone has created a HAM viewer that runs in the browser? I remember HAM flickering by necessity and being amazed by 4096 colors on-screen at once. There was a certain quality of HAM images on the Amiga that made them instantly identifiable. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hold-And-Modify&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While PC VGA modes eventually offered higher color depths, many argue the Amiga&amp;#39;s graphics often appeared superior due to artistic style and the technical advantages of its bit-plane architecture &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814890&quot; title=&quot;I missed out on the Amiga (introduced in 1985) at the time, being an early PC adopter. Went from CGA (1981) directly to VGA (1987). In terms of colors the most popular VGA modes (320x200 or 320x240, 256 color palette, 18 bit color depth) are superior to the most popular Amiga graphics modes (320×200 or 320x256, 32 color palette, 12 bit color depth). But somehow Amiga graphics is still often nicer .&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815356&quot; title=&quot;You&amp;#39;re comparing 1987 VGA to 1985 Amiga?  Not a realistic comparison. Technology advanced much more rapidly in those days. Similar to how hard drive capacity seemed to double every six months for a while, or how there&amp;#39;s a new bleeding edge AI model every three months today. Also, VGA had 256 colors. The Amiga had 4,096 simultaneously.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;[&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://abuseofnotation.github.io/category-theory-illustrated/04_order/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Category Theory Illustrated – Orders&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (abuseofnotation.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47813668&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;247 points · 63 comments · by boris_m&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article explores category theory through the lens of mathematical orders, defining structures like preorders, partial orders, and lattices by their governing laws and visualizing them as &amp;#34;thin&amp;#34; categories where the concepts of joins and meets correspond to categorical coproducts and products. &lt;a href=&quot;https://abuseofnotation.github.io/category-theory-illustrated/04_order/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Category Theory Illustrated - Orders    URL Source: https://abuseofnotation.github.io/category-theory-illustrated/04_order/    Published Time: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 10:30:55 GMT    Markdown Content:  Given a set of objects, there can be numerous criteria, based on which to order them (depending on the objects themselves) — size, weight, age, alphabetical order etc.    However, currently we are not interested in the _criteria_ that we can use to order objects, but in the _nature of the relationships_…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on significant technical inaccuracies in the article, particularly regarding the definition of antisymmetry and the use of a flawed code example that fails to handle equality in sorting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814820&quot; title=&quot;If someone does not want to check the mathematics line by line and prefers to give the article the benefit of the doubt, note that it also presents this JavaScript: [1, 3, 2].sort((a, b) =&amp;gt; {    if (a &amp;gt; b) {      return true } else {        return false    } }) This is not a valid comparator. It returns bools where the API expects a negative, zero or positive result, on my Chrome instance it returns `[1, 3, 2]`. That is roughly the level of correctness of the mathematics in the article as well,…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815290&quot; title=&quot;Ok, let&amp;#39;s say that it is not JS, but an untyped, closure-based programming language with a strikingly similar array and sort API to JS. Sadly, this comparator is still wrong for any sorting API that expects a general three-way comparison, because it does not handle equality as a separate case. And to tie it down to the mathematics: if a sorting algorithm asks for a full comparison between a and b, and your function returns only a bool, you are conflating the &amp;#39;no&amp;#39; (a is before b) with the &amp;#39;no&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814213&quot; title=&quot;Unless there&amp;#39;s some idiosyncratic meaning for the `=&amp;gt;`, the Antisymmetry one basically says `Orange -&amp;gt; Yellow =&amp;gt; Yellow -/&amp;gt; Orange`. The diagram is not acurate. The prose is very imprecise. &amp;#39;It also means that no ties are permitted - either I am better than my grandmother at soccer or she is better at it than me.&amp;#39; NO. Antisymmetry doesn&amp;#39;t exclude `x = y`. Ties are permitted in the equality case. Antisymmetry for a non-strict order says that if both directions hold, the two elements must in fact…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users defend the author’s &amp;#34;imprecise prose&amp;#34; as more accessible for beginners &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814635&quot; title=&quot;It really isn&amp;#39;t a long enough section to get lost in. The &amp;#39;not accurate&amp;#39; diagram says that orange-less-than-yellow implies yellow-not-less-than-orange.  Hard to find fault with. &amp;gt; NO. Antisymmetry doesn&amp;#39;t exclude `x = y`. Ties are permitted in the equality case. Antisymmetry for a non-strict order says that if both directions hold, the two elements must in fact be the same element. The author is describing strict comparison or total comparability intuition, not antisymmetry. I like the…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815560&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Sadly, this comparator is still wrong for any sorting API that expects a general three-way comparison, because it does not handle equality as a separate case. Let&amp;#39;s scroll up a little bit and read from the section you&amp;#39;re finding fault with: the most straightforward type of order that you think of is linear order i.e. one in which every object has its place depending on every other object Rather than the usual &amp;#39;harrumph! This writer knows NOTHING of mathematics and has no business writing…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, critics argue that conflating strict comparison with antisymmetry undermines the mathematical rigor necessary for teaching category theory &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815290&quot; title=&quot;Ok, let&amp;#39;s say that it is not JS, but an untyped, closure-based programming language with a strikingly similar array and sort API to JS. Sadly, this comparator is still wrong for any sorting API that expects a general three-way comparison, because it does not handle equality as a separate case. And to tie it down to the mathematics: if a sorting algorithm asks for a full comparison between a and b, and your function returns only a bool, you are conflating the &amp;#39;no&amp;#39; (a is before b) with the &amp;#39;no&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814213&quot; title=&quot;Unless there&amp;#39;s some idiosyncratic meaning for the `=&amp;gt;`, the Antisymmetry one basically says `Orange -&amp;gt; Yellow =&amp;gt; Yellow -/&amp;gt; Orange`. The diagram is not acurate. The prose is very imprecise. &amp;#39;It also means that no ties are permitted - either I am better than my grandmother at soccer or she is better at it than me.&amp;#39; NO. Antisymmetry doesn&amp;#39;t exclude `x = y`. Ties are permitted in the equality case. Antisymmetry for a non-strict order says that if both directions hold, the two elements must in fact…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond these specific errors, commenters debate whether the field lacks a &amp;#34;mind-blowing&amp;#34; application comparable to group theory&amp;#39;s proof of the quintic unsolvability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814129&quot; title=&quot;Is there a &amp;#39;mind-blowing fact&amp;#39; about category theory? Like the first time I&amp;#39;ve heard that one can prove there is no analytical solution for a polynomial equation with a degree &amp;gt; 5 with group theory , it was mind-blowing. What&amp;#39;s the counterpart of category theory?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814198&quot; title=&quot;Sure, category theory can&amp;#39;t prove the unsolvability of the quintic. But did you know that a monad is really just a monoid object in the monoidal category of endofunctors on the category of types of your favorite language?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, with some suggesting that the abstract nature of the subject can feel disconnected from daily routine &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814095&quot; title=&quot;I think it is pretty obvious that at the challenge with all abstract mathematics in general and the category theory in particular isnt the fact that people dont understand what a &amp;#39;linear order&amp;#39; is, but the fact it is so distant from daily routine that it seems completely pointless. It&amp;#39;s like pouring water over pefectly smooth glass&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814938&quot; title=&quot;If you want to learn category theory in a way that is more orthodox, a lot of people recommend Tom Leinster’s Basic Category Theory, which is free[1].  I’m going to be working through it soon, but the bit I’ve skimmed through looks really good if more “mathsy” than things like TFA. It also does a better job (imo) of justifying the existence of category theory as a field of study. [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.09375&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://goodereader.com/blog/kindle/amazon-is-discontinuing-kindle-for-pc-on-june-30th&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Amazon is discontinuing Kindle for PC on June 30th&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (goodereader.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47816878&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;158 points · 141 comments · by tech234a&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Amazon will discontinue its Kindle for PC app on June 30, 2026, replacing it with a new standalone version available exclusively through the Microsoft Store for Windows 11 users. &lt;a href=&quot;https://goodereader.com/blog/kindle/amazon-is-discontinuing-kindle-for-pc-on-june-30th&quot; title=&quot;Title: Amazon is discontinuing Kindle for PC on June 30th    URL Source: https://goodereader.com/blog/kindle/amazon-is-discontinuing-kindle-for-pc-on-june-30th    Published Time: 2026-04-17T00:04:33-04:00    Markdown Content:  # Amazon is discontinuing Kindle for PC on June 30th - Good e-Reader    [![Image 1: Good e-Reader](https://media.goodereader.com/blog/uploads/images/2026/03/11112039/goodeareader-logo-final.png)](https://goodereader.com/blog/)    *   [Kindle…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discontinuation of Kindle for PC and support for older hardware is widely viewed as a strategic move by Amazon to eliminate remaining loopholes for removing DRM from eBooks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817057&quot; title=&quot;Combined with the announcement that they&amp;#39;re killing the old Kindles as well...this is 100% about preventing people from liberating DRM from their books. Full stop. They are closing each and every remaining hole.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817072&quot; title=&quot;I never bought into Kindle because of this lockdown attitude. I buy audiobooks from audiobookstore and ebooks from google play books when lazy and itch and the other usual independent sites that sell drm free files when I&amp;#39;m not doing a jit in time purchase. I have a kindle I USB sideload or put files on sd card, because it has a physical keyboard. But with the state of digital goods disrepect for the customer and locking us in mustache twirling reasons, I have better ways to spend my income.…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the decision is a practical response to aging hardware and a poorly maintained Windows application &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817199&quot; title=&quot;Not necessarily? There was a post just a year ago on how somebody jailbroke the kindle books from the web UI. I think the more plausible and likely explanations are: 1. Kindles take a beating when people actually use them instead of putting them in a drawer. Not many older kindles are still in circulation that are old + used. How good is a 14 year old lithium battery at best doing? 2. Added to the above, how is a 14 year old CPU doing when trying to support modern features and eBooks that now…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that perfectly functional devices are being rendered obsolete against the owners&amp;#39; wishes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817202&quot; title=&quot;I got this April 8th: &amp;#39;Dear Customer, Thank you for being a longtime Kindle customer. We&amp;#39;re glad our devices have served you well for as long as they have. Starting May 20, 2026 — 14 to 18 years after their initial launches — we are discontinuing support for Kindle devices released in 2012 or earlier. Here&amp;#39;s what this means for you: You can continue to read books already downloaded on these devices, but you will not be able to purchase, borrow, or download additional books on them after that…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817352&quot; title=&quot;I strongly disagree. If it&amp;#39;s doing well enough for the owner then it&amp;#39;s doing well enough. I don&amp;#39;t understand how one can tell someone else that their computer is unacceptably slow for that other individual&amp;#39;s personal use. This is a really unfortunate move by Amazon. My next e-reader will be one that I own (instead of just rent). Glad that I took the time to jailbreak and pause updates on my 2017 kindle paperwhite while I could.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. This shift has prompted many users to migrate toward the Kobo ecosystem or DRM-free alternatives to ensure long-term ownership of their digital libraries &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817846&quot; title=&quot;I stopped doing Kindle purchases in the last few years because I sensed they were going in this direction. There are tons of vendors that will give you an epub of most titles. They often come with Adobe DRM but the UX of breaking that is even easier than how it used to be with Kindle.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817258&quot; title=&quot;I’m so happy I downloaded all my Kindle books when I still had a chance and then moved to the Kobo ecosystem, which albeit not perfect is much much better&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://geohot.github.io//blog/jekyll/update/2026/04/18/america-mandate-of-heaven.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;America Lost the Mandate of Heaven&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (geohot.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814073&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;96 points · &lt;strong&gt;104 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by mefengl&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;George Hotz argues that America has lost its &amp;#34;Mandate of Heaven&amp;#34; by prioritizing outsourcing, export controls, and AI-driven job displacement over domestic production and the flourishing of its citizens. &lt;a href=&quot;https://geohot.github.io//blog/jekyll/update/2026/04/18/america-mandate-of-heaven.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: America lost the Mandate of Heaven    URL Source: https://geohot.github.io/blog/jekyll/update/2026/04/18/america-mandate-of-heaven.html    Published Time: 2026-04-18T00:00:00+08:00    Markdown Content:  # America lost the Mandate of Heaven | the singularity is nearer    [the singularity is nearer](https://geohot.github.io/blog/)- [x]     [About](https://geohot.github.io/blog/about/)    # America lost the Mandate of Heaven    Apr 18, 2026    What does it mean if a country is winning?    I read an article a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely criticize the article for being a &amp;#34;short-sighted&amp;#34; critique of deindustrialization that fails to account for the value of American innovation and services &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814503&quot; title=&quot;I was expecting a more nuanced article that talked about the “Suez Moment” in America but this is basically a (not even a good) critique of deindustrialization.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814623&quot; title=&quot;Yeah it&amp;#39;s a very short-sighted article. Taking a quote like this: &amp;gt; I can’t believe those who seriously try and say America’s value is in consuming. as a case against outsourcing manufacturing really doesn&amp;#39;t understand the value that societies create when they are on the forefront of innovation. Maybe, just maybe , at a certain point physical labour is not the best way to use your working population, but instead, you know, services, innovation, etc? America has been doing pretty good in that…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the U.S. has lost its moral standing and shifted toward isolationism &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814697&quot; title=&quot;The article is certainly firebranding, but the core tenet strikes a valid point: how has the US lost the plot within such a short time? How did it go from the flag bearer of freedom and progress to isolationist bully that wants to invade Greenland and become best friends with Russia? From the outside it is really hard to comprehend. Was it FoxNews that poisoned the American mind or the social media brainwashing? How can a society allow a billionaire to cut programs in Africa that saved hundreds…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others debate whether China is truly leading in innovation or merely &amp;#34;catching up&amp;#34; in sectors like semiconductors and AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814712&quot; title=&quot;China is at the forefront of innovation. America is not, except for financial innovation a.k.a. the best ways to get money out of people without doing actual work.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814774&quot; title=&quot;China is a the forefront of catching up. Don&amp;#39;t mistake that for innovation. China isn&amp;#39;t building the best chips, that&amp;#39;s Taiwan with really Netherlands doing the hard part. China is catching up to European car makers except they&amp;#39;ve largely caught up to Tesla in the powertrain (I partly blame that on Americans boycotting Tesla for silly political reasons). In the AI space obviously China is just running after playing catch up. Biology, catch up. Chemistry, catch up. Physics, catch up. Where is…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. A notable point of contention is the American psyche, with one user contrasting China’s optimism regarding AI against a &amp;#34;mass hysteria&amp;#34; of job-loss paranoia in the United States &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814757&quot; title=&quot;The Chinese are not worried about AI taking anyone&amp;#39;s job. In fact they&amp;#39;re excited by it. For some reason, there is this unbelievably thick air of paranoia in America where everyone is just waiting for the day when their job will go away. To a point where I think it should be classified as mass hysteria and looked into by public health authorities. We should all introspect why so many of us perceive America as this very delicate thing that is hanging on with borrowed time and will fall apart at…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/drasimwagan/mdv&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: MDV – a Markdown superset for docs, dashboards, and slides with data&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47816629&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;138 points · 50 comments · by drasim&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MDV is a Markdown superset that enables users to create data-driven documents, dashboards, and slides using fenced code blocks for charts and KPIs. It supports HTML and PDF exports, features a VS Code extension with live preview, and renders visualizations as inline SVGs without a JavaScript runtime. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/drasimwagan/mdv&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - drasimwagan/mdv: MDV — a Markdown superset for documents, dashboards, and slides with embedded data and visualizations. HTML + PDF export, live preview, VS Code extension.    URL Source: https://github.com/drasimwagan/mdv    Markdown Content:  # GitHub - drasimwagan/mdv: MDV — a Markdown superset for documents, dashboards, and slides with embedded data and visualizations. HTML + PDF export, live preview, VS Code extension. · GitHub    [Skip to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the tension between Markdown’s simplicity and the need for complex data visualization, with some users warning that adding too many visual elements risks reinventing HTML or XML &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817390&quot; title=&quot;Markdown is a beautiful demonstration that document structure syntax can/should be simple. What most people do in Word is better done by just adjusting the document rendering/style, not the document structure... I love the idea of extending markdown to include more visual elements, but if you&amp;#39;re not careful you just reinvent HTML. Here&amp;#39;s my personal take on extending table syntax for charts. Easy to write, and if a renderer/parser understands the syntax you get a beautiful chart, and if it…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47819493&quot; title=&quot;This is XML without the &amp;lt; and &amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some participants propose extending table syntax to support charts or using JSON-like formats for better edit ergonomics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817390&quot; title=&quot;Markdown is a beautiful demonstration that document structure syntax can/should be simple. What most people do in Word is better done by just adjusting the document rendering/style, not the document structure... I love the idea of extending markdown to include more visual elements, but if you&amp;#39;re not careful you just reinvent HTML. Here&amp;#39;s my personal take on extending table syntax for charts. Easy to write, and if a renderer/parser understands the syntax you get a beautiful chart, and if it…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47818357&quot; title=&quot;Tables are the one thing in markdown where I’d prefer to emphasize edit ergonomics over good looking unrendered text. Making a quick manual change like adding column to a markdown table is just unfun. I’ve always thought a json like format that a linter can organize would be better. Which is all to say I really like the table proposal here - adding an optional linter to make the data look tabular in unrendered markdown will make it even better&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that advanced text editors like Vim or existing formats like Org-Mode and reStructuredText already solve these structural challenges &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47818962&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Making a quick manual change like adding column to a markdown table is just unfun. This is one of those moments where I realize that the vim life spoils me.  It&amp;#39;s so easy to do this in vim that I don&amp;#39;t even think about.  I probably use it a dozen times per day such as commenting out code. Ctrl + v, select where you want the character, then hit I (shift + i), type your thing, hit escape, and Bob&amp;#39;s your uncle.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817724&quot; title=&quot;Nice project. But at what point does Markdown just become Emacs Org-Mode? At least with Emacs you can write Lisp to make your document do anything you want.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47819177&quot; title=&quot;Even in Vim, the editing experience falls over when making markdown tables that have non-trivial content in their cells (multiple paragraphs, a code block, etc.). I recently learned that reStructuredText supports something called &amp;#39;list tables&amp;#39;: https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/ref/rst/directives.html... Where a table is specified as a depth-2 list and then post processed into a table. Lists support the full range of block elements already: you can have multiple paragraphs, code blocks, more…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Developers of similar tools noted that Markdown-based dashboarding is particularly effective for AI-assisted authoring and human review &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817913&quot; title=&quot;I work on a dashboarding / BI solution that is also built around markdown and clickhouse. www.evidence.dev We moved to stripe&amp;#39;s Markdoc variant for the component syntax last year and have been really happy with it. Models are good at writing it, people are good at reviewing it. Here&amp;#39;s an area chart that would issue a SQL query for weekly revenue totals: ```  {% area_chart      data=&amp;#39;my_table&amp;#39;     x=&amp;#39;date&amp;#39;     y=&amp;#39;sum(revenue)&amp;#39;      date_grain=&amp;#39;week&amp;#39;  /%}  ```&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47819579&quot; title=&quot;Looks wonderful, is there a skill or prompt that can teach agents how to use this format?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://byroot.github.io/ruby/performance/2026/04/18/faster-paths.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Optimizing Ruby Path Methods&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (byroot.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47819369&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;129 points · 58 comments · by weaksauce&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ruby developer Jean Boussier optimized several core path methods, including `File.join` and `Dir.scan`, to reduce application boot times and CI setup costs. By implementing fast paths for ASCII-compatible encodings and reducing syscall overhead, these updates achieved performance gains of up to 7x for common Ruby path operations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://byroot.github.io/ruby/performance/2026/04/18/faster-paths.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Optimizing Ruby Path Methods    URL Source: https://byroot.github.io/ruby/performance/2026/04/18/faster-paths.html    Published Time: 2026-04-18T12:03:51+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Optimizing Ruby Path Methods | byroot’s blog    [byroot&amp;#39;s blog](https://byroot.github.io/)- [x]     [About](https://byroot.github.io/about/)    # Optimizing Ruby Path Methods    Apr 18, 2026    Back in November last year, I started a new job at Intercom, and one of the first projects I got to work on was improving the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some question Ruby&amp;#39;s continued relevance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47819875&quot; title=&quot;don&amp;#39;t take this the wrong way, but -- people still use ruby?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, proponents argue it remains &amp;#34;best in class&amp;#34; for web development and scripting due to its superior APIs, excellent ORMs, and the &amp;#34;convention over configuration&amp;#34; philosophy of Rails &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47819893&quot; title=&quot;People should. I seriously miss using it at my day job. It&amp;#39;s not for code where type systems make things a lot more stable, but it&amp;#39;s great for scripting and quick things. Also ORMs in ruby are truly nice, and I haven&amp;#39;t found anything as good anywhere else. Generally speaking Ruby has the best APIs.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822479&quot; title=&quot;Makes me miss Ruby. Been in node typescript recently. Everything is a callback returning a promise in some weird resolution chain, mapped and conditional types, having to define schemas for everything and getting yelled at by lsp all day... Oh then you gotta write react components and worry about rerenders and undefined behavior caused by impurity in state, npm, arcane .json configs Versus active record, mvc, yaml configs, bundler, beautiful syntax, robust and trivially extendable stdlib,…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47821028&quot; title=&quot;I use Rails for many of my side projects.  Because of the emphasis on convention over configuration, Rails codebases tend to be succinct with minimal boilerplate, which keeps context windows small.  That in turn makes it great for agent-assisted work. For web stuff, with server-side rendering and partials it means minimal requirement to touch the hot mess that is JavaScript, and you can build PWAs that feel native pretty easily with Hotwire. Ruby is slow as fuck though, so there&amp;#39;s a tradeoff…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics point to &amp;#34;insane&amp;#34; inconsistencies in the standard library, such as the `slice` method returning an empty array in some out-of-bounds cases but `nil` in others &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47821119&quot; title=&quot;Frameworks and packages, sure. I’m not sure I would agree with APIs. ActiveAdmin is best in class, Rails is fantastic; but there’s a lot of insanity in the API for a language that “gets out of the way” and “just works” Slice is my favorite example. (It’s been a bit since I’ve used it) [0].slice(0, 100) == [0]    [].slice(0, 100) == … exception? Or nil? Why does it equal []? For a “give me an array back that starts from a given, arbitrary index, and auto-handle truncation” not having that…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824152&quot; title=&quot;Sorry, I mis-spoke earlier, this is what I should have shared: [].slice(5, 100) ^-- *THIS* either returns nil or throws an exception. Edit: Longer example: puts &amp;#39;[1, 2, 3].slice(1, 100) -&amp;gt; #{[1, 2, 3].slice(1, 100).to_s}&amp;#39;    puts &amp;#39;[1, 2, 3].slice(3, 100) -&amp;gt; #{[1, 2, 3].slice(3, 100).to_s}&amp;#39;    puts &amp;#39;[1, 2, 3].slice(4, 100) -&amp;gt; #{[1, 2, 3].slice(4, 100).to_s}&amp;#39; Yields: [1, 2, 3].slice(1, 100) -&amp;gt; [2, 3]    [1, 2, 3].slice(3, 100) -&amp;gt; []    [1, 2, 3].slice(4, 100) -&amp;gt; So, there is a behavior difference…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite concerns over its slow performance and the rise of TypeScript, many developers still prefer Ruby&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;beautiful syntax&amp;#34; and rapid prototyping capabilities over the complexity of modern JavaScript ecosystems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822479&quot; title=&quot;Makes me miss Ruby. Been in node typescript recently. Everything is a callback returning a promise in some weird resolution chain, mapped and conditional types, having to define schemas for everything and getting yelled at by lsp all day... Oh then you gotta write react components and worry about rerenders and undefined behavior caused by impurity in state, npm, arcane .json configs Versus active record, mvc, yaml configs, bundler, beautiful syntax, robust and trivially extendable stdlib,…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822550&quot; title=&quot;What happened to Ruby? It was very successful at some point. Maybe kids started using JS exclusively. But what happened to older developers? Did they move over? Rails seemed to enable very fast prototyping and iteration. Isn&amp;#39;t it still the case? I see PHP usage going down, but PHP doesn&amp;#39;t seem to have any advantages over JS, .NET, Python or Go. While Ruby coupled with Rails promised easy and rapid development. Of course, Ruby might not be best suited for large code bases or microservices but…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47821028&quot; title=&quot;I use Rails for many of my side projects.  Because of the emphasis on convention over configuration, Rails codebases tend to be succinct with minimal boilerplate, which keeps context windows small.  That in turn makes it great for agent-assisted work. For web stuff, with server-side rendering and partials it means minimal requirement to touch the hot mess that is JavaScript, and you can build PWAs that feel native pretty easily with Hotwire. Ruby is slow as fuck though, so there&amp;#39;s a tradeoff…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-04-17</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-04-17</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-design-anthropic-labs&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Claude Design&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (anthropic.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47806725&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1217 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 750 comments · by meetpateltech&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic has launched Claude Design, a new initiative from Anthropic Labs focused on exploring and sharing the design principles and creative processes behind the development of the Claude AI interface. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-design-anthropic-labs&quot; title=&quot;Related: &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;x.com&amp;amp;#x2F;flomerboy&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2045162321589252458&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;x.com&amp;amp;#x2F;flomerboy&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2045162321589252458&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;flomerboy&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2045162321589252458&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;flomerboy&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2045162321589252458&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;)&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of Claude Design has sparked a debate over whether AI-driven UI generation fosters efficiency or merely accelerates the &amp;#34;homogenization&amp;#34; of the web &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807009&quot; title=&quot;I reckon something like this has only been possible to develop because of how homogenous the internet has become in terms of design ever since the glass effect and drop-shadows took over in Web 2.0 and Twitter Bootstrap entered the scene. You&amp;#39;ll get a competent UI with little effort but nothing truly unique or mind-blowing. Impressive technology, but that old skool artisanal weirdness of yore only becomes more valuable and nostalgic.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807073&quot; title=&quot;The more I think about it the more this isn&amp;#39;t good for design [EDIT], for a few reasons: - The best design is original, groundbreaking and often counterintuitive. An AI model is incapable of that, it&amp;#39;s uninspired, it will absolutely converge to the norm and homogeneity (you see it everywhere now, just scroll on ShowHN and take a look at the UIs) and produce the safest design that appeals to its understanding of the ideal user. - Good designers will reject this, they prefer to be hands-on and…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that standardized, &amp;#34;obvious&amp;#34; interfaces are ideal for functional tools like medical software, others contend that AI lacks the capacity for the original thought and &amp;#34;artisanal weirdness&amp;#34; required for truly groundbreaking design &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807176&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s no shame in being homogenous and obvious, though. If I&amp;#39;m building out an internal tool for, say, a hospital lawyer to search through malpractice lawsuits, I want my tool to be the most familiar, obvious, least-surprising UI/UX possible. Just stay out of the way and do what it&amp;#39;s supposed to do. The trick is, of course, that the human is still responsible for knowing when homogenous is fine, or when there&amp;#39;s real value in the presentation. If you&amp;#39;re making a website for, say, a VST plugin…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807337&quot; title=&quot;Of course, there is indeed no shame. There is also no pride. Standardized interfaces are as exciting as kettle thermal switches or physical knobs in cars. Useful, probably optimal and will be around for decades to come. Also nobody talks about it, treats it with interest, or pays above market rate to work on it. The value becomes the architecture of the value of the tool, not the interface. There is still value being generated, but the need for a highly paid UX designer evaporates, and is…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47806992&quot; title=&quot;Thumbs down. Great design is original thought. AI is wholly incapable of that. Go ahead and roast me.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics warn that these tools may lead users to confuse output with agency, potentially blinding them to the deep structural problem-solving that defines professional design &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47808702&quot; title=&quot;On Notes on the Synthesis of Form, Alexander defines design as the rationalization of the forces that define a problem. You’ll won’t find a better definition. But people tend to think design is the synthesis and its results. This misunderstanding of the role of design and the designer is responsible for all the unfit designs we encounter on a daily basis. Anyone equipped with a synthesis tool and feeling empowered to quickly and cheaply generate forms will almost inevitably become blind to the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47808894&quot; title=&quot;This is a really verbose way to say that using generative AI has a detrimental effect on the user because one deprives themselves of the learning experience.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, proponents suggest that AI can accelerate learning by handling mundane tasks, allowing creators to focus on higher-level architecture rather than &amp;#34;tracking down stupid issues&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47808930&quot; title=&quot;Agreed on your take on the parent, although I have to say I feel that AI has had the opposite effect for me.  It has only accelerated learning quite significantly.  In fact not only is learning more effective/efficient, I have more time for it because I am not spending nearly as much time tracking down stupid issues.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807337&quot; title=&quot;Of course, there is indeed no shame. There is also no pride. Standardized interfaces are as exciting as kettle thermal switches or physical knobs in cars. Useful, probably optimal and will be around for decades to come. Also nobody talks about it, treats it with interest, or pays above market rate to work on it. The value becomes the architecture of the value of the tool, not the interface. There is still value being generated, but the need for a highly paid UX designer evaporates, and is…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.claudecodecamp.com/p/i-measured-claude-4-7-s-new-tokenizer-here-s-what-it-costs-you&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Measuring Claude 4.7&amp;#39;s tokenizer costs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (claudecodecamp.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807006&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;707 points · 493 comments · by aray07&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic&amp;#39;s Claude 4.7 tokenizer uses 1.3x to 1.47x more tokens for English and code compared to version 4.6, effectively increasing per-session costs by 20–30%. While the change improves strict instruction following by roughly 5%, it causes users to hit rate limits and context windows significantly faster. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.claudecodecamp.com/p/i-measured-claude-4-7-s-new-tokenizer-here-s-what-it-costs-you&quot; title=&quot;Title: I Measured Claude 4.7&amp;#39;s New Tokenizer. Here&amp;#39;s What It Costs You.    URL Source: https://www.claudecodecamp.com/p/i-measured-claude-4-7-s-new-tokenizer-here-s-what-it-costs-you    Published Time: 2026-04-16T21:36:51.125Z    Markdown Content:  Anthropic&amp;#39;s Claude Opus 4.7 migration guide says the new tokenizer uses &amp;#39;roughly 1.0 to 1.35x as many tokens&amp;#39; as 4.6. I measured 1.47x on technical docs. 1.45x on a real CLAUDE.md file. The top of Anthropic&amp;#39;s range is where most Claude Code content actually…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether the increased cost of Claude 3.7 Opus reflects a genuine leap in intelligence or simply a move along a logarithmic performance-to-cost frontier with diminishing returns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807499&quot; title=&quot;LLMs exist on a logaritmhic performance/cost frontier. It&amp;#39;s not really clear whether Opus 4.5+ represent a level shift on this frontier or just inhabits place on that curve which delivers higher performance, but at rapidly diminishing returns to inference cost. To me, it is hard to reject this hypothesis today. The fact that Anthropic is rapidly trying to increase price may betray the fact that their recent lead is at the cost of dramatically higher operating costs. Their gross margins in this…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807766&quot; title=&quot;IMHO there is a point where incremental model quality will hit diminishing returns. It is like comparing an 8K display to a 16K display because at normal viewing distance, the difference is imperceptible, but 16K comes at significant premium. The same applies to intelligence. Sure, some users might register a meaningful bump, but if 99% can&amp;#39;t tell the difference in their day-to-day work, does it matter? A 20-30% cost increase needs to deliver a proportional leap in perceivable value.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users report frustrating regressions in model behavior and high latency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810204&quot; title=&quot;I did some work yesterday with Opus and found it amazing. Today we are almost on non-speaking terms.  I&amp;#39;m asking it to do some simple stuff and he&amp;#39;s making incredible stupid mistakes: This is the third time that I have to ask you to remove the issue that was there for more than 20 hours. What is going on here? and at the same time the compacting is firing like crazy. (What adds ~4 minute delays every 1 - 15 minutes) | # | Time     | Gap before | Session span | API calls |   …&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that token costs remain negligible compared to the value of human engineering time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810256&quot; title=&quot;I find it interesting that folks are so focused on cost for AI models. Human time spent redirecting AI coding agents towards better strategies and reviewing work, remains dramatically more expensive than the token cost for AI coding, for anything other than hobby work (where you&amp;#39;re not paying for the human labor). $200/month is an expensive hobby, but it&amp;#39;s negligible as a business expense; SalesForce licenses cost far more. The key question is how well it a given model does the work, which is a…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant skepticism regarding Anthropic’s corporate trajectory, with commenters suggesting that price hikes and a potential IPO signal a shift from &amp;#34;global good&amp;#34; ethics toward prioritizing shareholder profit and revenue per user &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807848&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;re also getting closer to IPO and have a growing user base. They can&amp;#39;t justify losing a very large number of billions of other people&amp;#39;s money in their IPO prospectus. So there&amp;#39;s a push for them to increase revenue per user, which brings us closer to the real cost of running these models.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807952&quot; title=&quot;I agree, and I&amp;#39;m also quite skeptical that Anthropic will be able to remain true to its initial, noble mission statement of acting for the global good once they IPO. At that point you are beholden to your shareholders and no longer can eschew profit in favor of ethics. Unfortunately, I think this is the beginning of the end of Anthropic and Modei being a company and CEO you could actually get behind and believe that they were trying to do &amp;#39;the right thing&amp;#39;. It will become an increasingly more…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807985&quot; title=&quot;Skeptical is a light way to put it. It is essentially a forgone conclusion that once a company IPOs, any veil that they might be working for the global good is entirely lifted. A publicly traded company is legally obligated to go against the global good.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hex.ooo/library/last_question.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Isaac Asimov: The Last Question (1956)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (hex.ooo)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47804965&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;772 points · 301 comments · by ColinWright&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Across trillions of years, humanity repeatedly asks its most advanced computers if entropy can be reversed to save the dying universe, only to receive &amp;#34;insufficient data&amp;#34; until the final machine, existing alone in the void, discovers the solution and triggers a new Big Bang. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hex.ooo/library/last_question.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Isaac Asimov: The Last Question    URL Source: https://hex.ooo/library/last_question.html    Published Time: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 01:26:19 GMT    Markdown Content:  ## Isaac Asimov    The last question was asked for the first time, half in jest, on May 21, 2061, at a time when humanity first stepped into the light. The question came about as a result of a five dollar bet over highballs, and it happened this way:    Alexander Adell and Bertram Lupov were two of the faithful attendants of Multivac. As…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The story’s iconic refrain, &amp;#34;INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR MEANINGFUL ANSWER,&amp;#34; sparked a debate over modern LLMs, with some arguing they are &amp;#34;hardcoded to never say no&amp;#34; while others believe they can be prompted to admit ignorance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47805837&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR MEANINGFUL ANSWER Boy, it sure would be nice if real LLMs were capable of giving an answer like that.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47806273&quot; title=&quot;They can do it, it&amp;#39;s just not &amp;#39;by default&amp;#39;, they need to be prompted to do it. So at least the danger is manageable if you know what you&amp;#39;re doing and how to prompt around it.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47806564&quot; title=&quot;Not really. They&amp;#39;re still non deterministic language predictors. Believing that a prompt is an effective way to actually control these machines&amp;#39; actual behavior is really far fetched. They com like that from factory. Hardcoded to never say no.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Readers shared nostalgic anecdotes of experiencing the story in planetariums or compared its themes of cosmic entropy to the video game *Outer Wilds* &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47805910&quot; title=&quot;I remember the first time I heard this story. I was maybe 7 at a planetarium and they animated it with music little hand drawn starships and retro computers floating among the stars. They turned the stars all out for the final scene.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47806093&quot; title=&quot;Outer Wilds vibes! I love it! (It&amp;#39;s a video game that does a brilliant job touching on similar themes to The Last Question. If you liked The Last Question and can fit a video game into your life, you will probably like Outer Wilds. Warning: if you start searching for &amp;#39;outer wilds,&amp;#39; the algorithm will aggressively try to spoil you. Progression in the game is gated behind knowledge, so this is worse than usual. If you have trouble resisting the temptation to google past a rough description, it&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While the story remains a perennial favorite, some users questioned if their love for the genre is actually a specific preference for Asimov’s unique writing style &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47805326&quot; title=&quot;This is one of those stories, just like the SR-71 &amp;#39;ground speed check&amp;#39; story, that every single time I see it posted I just have to read the entire thing again. I love it.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47805487&quot; title=&quot;For a while I thought I really liked sci fi novels and short stories, and maybe that&amp;#39;s somewhat true. But I&amp;#39;ve started wondering if maybe I just liked Asimov&amp;#39;s writing in particular. Other writers in the genre are more hit or miss. Can anyone recommend other writers that are on his level?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/it-is-time-to-ban-the-sale-of-precise-geolocation&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ban the sale of precise geolocation&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lawfaremedia.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47806304&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;757 points · 196 comments · by hn_acker&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Citing significant privacy and national security risks, this report argues that the U.S. must ban the sale of precise geolocation data to prevent both domestic surveillance abuses and exploitation by foreign intelligence services. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/it-is-time-to-ban-the-sale-of-precise-geolocation&quot; title=&quot;Title: It Is Time to Ban the Sale of Precise Geolocation    URL Source: https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/it-is-time-to-ban-the-sale-of-precise-geolocation    Markdown Content:  # It Is Time to Ban the Sale of Precise Geolocation | Lawfare  [Skip to Main Content](https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/it-is-time-to-ban-the-sale-of-precise-geolocation#site-main)    Menu    [![Image 1:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that &amp;#34;anonymized&amp;#34; geolocation data is a rhetorical fiction, as precise coordinates for home and work can easily de-anonymize individuals by cross-referencing public records &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47806669&quot; title=&quot;A lot of geolocation data on the market is anonymized, following medium-lived unique IDs that aren&amp;#39;t able to be mapped to other identifiers. The problem with that is that if you have precise locations, or enough samples that you can apply statistics to find precise locations, in many cases you can de-anonymize the IDs. You can purchase address and resident listings from a number of different data vendors, and by checking where the device returns to at night you can figure its home address. Then…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807024&quot; title=&quot;There is no such thing as anonymized location data when you have the location of something where and when they sleep and work. It&amp;#39;s a rhetorical fiction the ad industry tells itself.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest banning data gathering without explicit contractual agreements or warrants &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47806546&quot; title=&quot;IMO we should ban gathering this data without a warrant or specific contractual agreement between the device owner and entity aggregating the data. As much as congress loves to claim the interstate commerce theory of everything, this seems like a slam dunk.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47806739&quot; title=&quot;I should have been a bit more clear. We should ban retention for any purposes where it is not explicitly required for the intended function and clearly agreed to by all parties. Think somethig like strava or asset tracking. You know it stores gps data, and why.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that one-sided EULAs make genuine user consent impossible &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47806646&quot; title=&quot;Contractual agreement?  Nobody reads things like EULAs or terms of service.  It&amp;#39;s probably in there already.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47806834&quot; title=&quot;There is no such things as &amp;#39;clearly agreed to by all parties&amp;#39; when it comes to end users. Companies provide a one-sided, &amp;#39;take it or leave it&amp;#39; EULA, and if you don&amp;#39;t agree to everything in it, you don&amp;#39;t use the product. There is no meeting of the minds, there is no negotiation, and there is no actual agreement. It&amp;#39;s a rule book dictated by one side.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant debate over the efficacy of the GDPR, with some viewing it as a needlessly complex compliance burden and others defending it as a clear regulation that was undermined by adtech industry narratives and a lack of enforcement &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47806724&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; IMO we should ban gathering this data without GDPR tried. And the narrative around GDPR was deliberately completely derailed by adtech. Lack of enforcement didn&amp;#39;t help either&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47806756&quot; title=&quot;GDPR like all EU regulation is needlessly complicated and aimed at a compliance model that seems designed for SAP.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47806821&quot; title=&quot;You can literally read the entire &amp;#39;complicated&amp;#39; regulation in one sitting in an afternoon. There&amp;#39;s literally nothing complex or complicated about it. Congrats on gullibly believing the ad tech narrative.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47806622&quot; title=&quot;Just ban the sale of any kind of adtracking. That way we can get rid of the cookiewalls too. Missed opportunity by the EU when they wrote GDPR.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://reclaimthenet.org/us-bill-mandates-on-device-age-verification&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;US Bill Mandates On-Device Age Verification&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (reclaimthenet.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47801991&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;398 points · 328 comments · by ronsor&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Parents Decide Act (H.R. 8250) would require operating system providers like Apple and Google to verify the age of all users during device setup, creating a mandatory national identification layer for smartphones and computers under the guise of child safety. &lt;a href=&quot;https://reclaimthenet.org/us-bill-mandates-on-device-age-verification&quot; title=&quot;Title: US Bill Mandates On-Device Age Verification    URL Source: https://reclaimthenet.org/us-bill-mandates-on-device-age-verification    Published Time: 2026-04-16T22:08:48+00:00    Markdown Content:  A bill introduced by Representative Josh Gottheimer in the House on April 13 would require Apple, Google, and every other operating system vendor to verify the age of anyone setting up a new device in the United States.    The legislation, H.R. 8250, travels under the friendlier name of the Parents…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on whether this bill represents a &amp;#34;privacy-preserving&amp;#34; approach to age verification that could preempt more draconian measures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47802731&quot; title=&quot;The breathless fearmongering over an age field on account set up is just completely over-the-top. This is probably the least bad out of all possible ways to implement age checking. The benefit of this is that it can short-circuit support for more onerous age verification. The writing has been on the wall for some time now: the era of completely unrestricted internet is coming to an end. The question is how awful will the new normal be? Legislation like this is a win all around, a complete…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47805740&quot; title=&quot;Based on the few snippets quoted in the article, I think as written this bill gets closer to a good, privacy-preserving, non-authoritarian version of &amp;#39;age verification&amp;#39; than any of the attempts so far. What it seems to be aiming for is essentially mandatory parental controls at the OS level. No ID checking or government/third party involvement, it just uses whatever age the parents enter when they set up the device/user account for their kid. And apps don&amp;#39;t actually get that info so there&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, or a &amp;#34;draconian&amp;#34; overreach that ignores the root causes of poor parenting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47804684&quot; title=&quot;Politicians will do any draconian measure to help kids except try and improve the lives of their parents so that they can actually dedicate time to parenting. Making it slightly harder to access the internet fixes nothing. What if instead of having the largest prison population in the world our government supported communities that make raising good children possible? Our society needs to lose this urge to diagnose each other and provide some forceful treatment and instead set sights on…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant concerns exist regarding the bill&amp;#39;s vague definitions of &amp;#34;operating system&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;mobile device,&amp;#34; which critics argue could inadvertently criminalize independent software development or apply to hardware like cars and appliances &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47803236&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The term “operating system” means software that supports the basic functions of a computer, mobile device, or any other general purpose computing device. &amp;gt; The term “operating system provider” means a person that develops, licenses, or controls the operating system on a computer, mobile device, or any other general purpose computing device. So excited to see the GNU vs. Linux debate finally land in court.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47803387&quot; title=&quot;This is horribly vague. &amp;gt;a computer, mobile device, or any other general purpose computing device. It leaves open to interpretation if it applies to all computers, or just general purpose ones. Does a car count as a mobile device?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47803463&quot; title=&quot;Car is clearly a mobile device; it has a touchscreen and an IMEI. Going to be fun when my washing machine asks me to upload a scan of my passport to the CIA before it will open the door.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47805740&quot; title=&quot;Based on the few snippets quoted in the article, I think as written this bill gets closer to a good, privacy-preserving, non-authoritarian version of &amp;#39;age verification&amp;#39; than any of the attempts so far. What it seems to be aiming for is essentially mandatory parental controls at the OS level. No ID checking or government/third party involvement, it just uses whatever age the parents enter when they set up the device/user account for their kid. And apps don&amp;#39;t actually get that info so there&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, some skeptics point out that on-device verification is easily bypassed by children borrowing adult devices or using accounts registered by others &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47802568&quot; title=&quot;People lend phones or computers to kids.  The age associated with the user account means absolutely nothing.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47804106&quot; title=&quot;No worries, by that time so many people will have lost their jobs because of AI that you can hire a homeless person to register all your devices for a snickers. Dirty Mike and the Boys are going to own a lot of mobile devices, and control the world trade of snickers. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FkK8ZFE7Y0 The CIA hates that trick.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Exploration/The_toxic_side_of_the_Moon&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;All 12 moonwalkers had &amp;quot;lunar hay fever&amp;quot; from dust smelling like gunpowder (2018)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (esa.int)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47808913&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;451 points · 264 comments · by cybermango&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All 12 Apollo moonwalkers experienced &amp;#34;lunar hay fever&amp;#34; caused by sharp, abrasive lunar dust that smells like burnt gunpowder and can damage human lung and brain cells. ESA is now researching these toxic effects to ensure the safety of future long-term missions to the Moon. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Exploration/The_toxic_side_of_the_Moon&quot; title=&quot;Title: The toxic side of the Moon    URL Source: https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Exploration/The_toxic_side_of_the_Moon    Published Time: Sat, 18 Apr 2026 05:27:29 GMT    Markdown Content:  # ESA - The toxic side of the Moon    We use cookies which are essential for you to access our website and/or to provide you with our services, enable you to share our website content via your social media accounts and allow us to measure and improve the performance of our website.    [Accept…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#34;gunpowder&amp;#34; scent reported by moonwalkers is attributed to the rapid oxidation of lunar dust when it first contacts oxygen in an airlock, whereas the distinct ozone smell of space is compared to UV sterilizers, lightning, or photocopiers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809790&quot; title=&quot;I recall an article from a long time ago that basically said “astronauts report” the moon smells like spent gunpowder and outer space smell like… I think it was ozone. What they were actually reporting was the smell of the airlocks after they returned from their excursions. The moon has no atmosphere, so it has been accumulating dust from billions of years of asteroid impacts that have never come in contact with oxygen. Many of the chemicals in the dust are oxidative and so when it is exposed…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809850&quot; title=&quot;My UV sterilizing lights make my room smell like O3 Ozone and that smells nothing like spent gun-powder to me.  The only other time I have smelled the same thing is when there has been mass lightening events in the sky.  Were they talking about actual black powder or nitrocellulose?  I&amp;#39;ve smelled black powder at the range when people bring out their antique rifles and that also does not smell like Ozone to me.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809875&quot; title=&quot;Photocopiers smell like ozone when they run if anyone’s forgotten the smell&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809895&quot; title=&quot;Photocopiers smell like ozone when they run if anyone’s forgotten the smell Those are similar but sweeter.  If I sterilize a room with UV it has a very distinct smell like nothing else aside from lightening and stun guns.  I would UV the bathroom right now but then I have to vent the entire house and its 34F outside right now.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion regarding Mars highlights that its regolith contains toxic perchlorates, presenting a significant barrier to colonization that would require specialized docking suits or massive terraforming efforts to neutralize the soil &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809377&quot; title=&quot;Mars has toxic levels of perchlorates in the regolith. That will require that humans never come in contact with the regolith or things that touched it. Those space suits that dock to vehicles seem like a necessity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perchlorate#On_Mars&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809561&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, the ground on mars is literally toxic. Makes the concept of a Martian colony less appealing. Almost equal to a floating station on Venus. At least there you’d have the correct pressure. I seem to recall that the temperature on Venus at an altitude of one atmospheric pressure is manageable. It’s just also acidic. Possibility easier to deal with than perchlorates.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809839&quot; title=&quot;If we terraform mars, isn&amp;#39;t the dirt still toxic?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809877&quot; title=&quot;No, as terraforming means changing that. Whether it is really possible, is a different question, but after you have an atmosphere, you could have engineered microorganism processing the soil etc.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that Mars’s solid ground is preferable to the acidic but pressure-stable atmosphere of Venus, others express concern over the long-term health risks of exposure to &amp;#34;space asbestos&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809561&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, the ground on mars is literally toxic. Makes the concept of a Martian colony less appealing. Almost equal to a floating station on Venus. At least there you’d have the correct pressure. I seem to recall that the temperature on Venus at an altitude of one atmospheric pressure is manageable. It’s just also acidic. Possibility easier to deal with than perchlorates.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809622&quot; title=&quot;Without massive terraforming all of Mars is very hostile. But having solid ground is still nice. A workable compromise is making big habitats in a dome, that gives sunlight, but shields from radiation. And the ground needs to be processed obviously. The advantage of Venus to me is is gravity.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809256&quot; title=&quot;Have any of them developed cancer from the space asbestos yet?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://archive.org/details/byte-magazine-1975-09&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Archive of BYTE magazine, starting with issue #1 in 1975&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (archive.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47806096&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;562 points · 147 comments · by DamnInteresting&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Internet Archive has digitized the September 1975 debut issue of *BYTE*, a seminal &amp;#34;small systems journal&amp;#34; featuring guides on microprocessors, assembly language, and hardware kits for early computing enthusiasts. &lt;a href=&quot;https://archive.org/details/byte-magazine-1975-09&quot; title=&quot;Title: Byte Magazine Volume 00 Number 01 - The Worlds Greatest Toy : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive    URL Source: https://archive.org/details/byte-magazine-1975-09    Markdown Content:  # Byte Magazine Volume 00 Number 01 - The Worlds Greatest Toy : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive  [Skip to main content](https://archive.org/details/byte-magazine-1975-09#maincontent)    [Ask the publishers](https://change.org/LetReadersRead) to restore access to 500,000+…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Readers remember *BYTE* as a massive, book-like publication that often exceeded 300 pages, characterized by a high density of advertisements that served as a vital directory for hardware and software in the pre-internet era &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823435&quot; title=&quot;Two things always stood out for me about Byte 1, It&amp;#39;s a massive book like magazine if you ever hold one in your hand. Usually more than 300 pages sometimes up to 500, it&amp;#39;s not like today&amp;#39;s print media at all. I&amp;#39;m not even sure huge magazines like this exist anymore. 2, The amount of ads are insane. Like 1:3 ratio of article:ads if not more. Most of the times the lead articles are interrupted by 3 pages of ads after every page.  It&amp;#39;s interesting to look back at those ads from today but it&amp;#39;s also…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823534&quot; title=&quot;Those ads were the only way to actually know what software and hardware was available to buy, including information related to &amp;#39;open source of the day&amp;#39;, shareware, PD,... Access to BBS was super expensive unless you were lucky to afford a modem, and live on local call distance. European magazine like Computer Shopper were of similar size and ads ratio.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some found the 1:3 article-to-ad ratio jarring, others viewed the targeted ads as essential content, often &amp;#34;devouring&amp;#34; issues cover-to-cover while living in remote areas or writing code by hand before owning a computer &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823435&quot; title=&quot;Two things always stood out for me about Byte 1, It&amp;#39;s a massive book like magazine if you ever hold one in your hand. Usually more than 300 pages sometimes up to 500, it&amp;#39;s not like today&amp;#39;s print media at all. I&amp;#39;m not even sure huge magazines like this exist anymore. 2, The amount of ads are insane. Like 1:3 ratio of article:ads if not more. Most of the times the lead articles are interrupted by 3 pages of ads after every page.  It&amp;#39;s interesting to look back at those ads from today but it&amp;#39;s also…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823550&quot; title=&quot;From 1988-91, I was a volunteer teacher in Africa. I lived in a hut without running water or electricity, and I had a subscription to Byte. There was also almost nothing to read, so when my monthly issue of Byte appeared (2-3 months later than most people would receive it), I devoured that thing. I would read it literally cover to cover, including all those ads, several times. I wasn&amp;#39;t (then) working in IT, so a lot of the content (like Steve Ciarcia&amp;#39;s Circuit Cellar) went way over my head but…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823590&quot; title=&quot;Ads that are well target aren&amp;#39;t jarring. They are just part of the magazine. I remember reading ads about a specific make of vacuum pumps next to an article with experiments which used them. Today&amp;#39;s ads are so obtrusive because you get toilet seat ads next to an article about general relativity.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824332&quot; title=&quot;lol greetings fellow Basic pencil coder! I used to also write basic programs by hand because I didn’t have a computer. Pournelle original claim to fame was as one of the authors of “Strategy of Technology“ which was very influential in the 70s. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategy_of_Technology&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The magazine is fondly recalled for its platform-agnostic technical depth and legendary columns like Jerry Pournelle’s &amp;#34;Chaos Manor,&amp;#34; though it eventually shifted focus toward the high-end PC market before the rise of the web rendered print media obsolete &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823550&quot; title=&quot;From 1988-91, I was a volunteer teacher in Africa. I lived in a hut without running water or electricity, and I had a subscription to Byte. There was also almost nothing to read, so when my monthly issue of Byte appeared (2-3 months later than most people would receive it), I devoured that thing. I would read it literally cover to cover, including all those ads, several times. I wasn&amp;#39;t (then) working in IT, so a lot of the content (like Steve Ciarcia&amp;#39;s Circuit Cellar) went way over my head but…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823405&quot; title=&quot;Chaos Manor always seemed like this mystical place to me as a kid. Limitless budget and always messing with hardware and software, whether necessary or not :-)&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824522&quot; title=&quot;Looking at it today what I notice is that the ads and the content were disjoint.  The ads were heavily for high-end microcomputers often running CP/M and the S-100 bus often in multiprocessor and multiuser configurations often with exotic graphic systems for the time,  like you see these guys https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cromemco [1] prominently.  That stuff was barely talked about in the editorial which was much more about ‘home computers’ like Apple and TRS-80 and Atari and TI up to 1983 or…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://miguelconner.substack.com/p/im-coding-by-hand&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I’m spending months coding the old way&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (miguelconner.substack.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807583&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;357 points · 351 comments · by evakhoury&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Miguel Conner is attending a programming retreat at the Recurse Center in Brooklyn to improve his technical skills by coding without AI assistance, focusing on building large language models from scratch and mastering Python to gain a deeper understanding of computer science fundamentals. &lt;a href=&quot;https://miguelconner.substack.com/p/im-coding-by-hand&quot; title=&quot;Title: I&amp;#39;m Coding by Hand    URL Source: https://miguelconner.substack.com/p/im-coding-by-hand    Published Time: 2026-04-15T15:57:10+00:00    Markdown Content:  [![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The integration of LLMs into software development has sparked a debate over the loss of &amp;#34;cognitive persistence,&amp;#34; with experienced developers arguing that reaching for AI after only 20 minutes of debugging prevents the deep learning that comes from multi-hour or multi-week struggles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810947&quot; title=&quot;This is ominous and very depressing given what we&amp;#39;ve recently learned / reconfirmed about LLMs sapping our ability to persist through difficult problems: &amp;gt; There were 2 or 3 bugs that stumped me, and after 20 min or so of debugging I asked Claude for some advice. But most of the debugging was by hand! Twenty whole minutes. Us old-timers (I am 39) are chortling. I am not trying to knock the author specifically. But he was doing this for education, not for work. He should have spent more like 6…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811074&quot; title=&quot;YES. I don&amp;#39;t know how many multi WEEK sessions of debugging I&amp;#39;ve been through in my career. Frustrating, but so many valuable lessons learned in the process. LLMs are absolutely causing us to lose something very important.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see AI as a vital tool for physical longevity and productivity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810890&quot; title=&quot;I did things the old way for 25 years and my carpal tunnels are wearing out. LLMs let me produce the same quality I always have with a lot less typing so not mad at that at all. I review and own every line I commit, and feel no desire to go back to the old way. What scares the shit out of me are all these new CS grads that admit they have never coded anything more complex than basic class assignments by hand, and just let LLMs push straight to main for everything and they get hired as senior…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810749&quot; title=&quot;You should do what you want, and as a break it’s fine. But IMO right now the most leverage for most people is learning how to effectively manage agents. It’s really hard. Not many are truly good with it. It will be relevant for a long time.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others emphasize that manual coding fosters &amp;#34;active recall&amp;#34; and a mental model of the codebase that &amp;#34;vibe coding&amp;#34; lacks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811182&quot; title=&quot;I wish more was being invested in AI autocomplete workflows. That was a nice middle-ground. But yeah my hunch is &amp;#39;the old way&amp;#39; - although not sure we can even call it that - is likely still on par with an &amp;#39;agentic&amp;#39; workflow if you view it through a wider lens. You retain much better knowledge of the codebase. You improve your understanding over coding concepts (active recall is far stronger than passive recognition).&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811883&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m a big advocate for AI, including GenAI. But I still spend a fair amount of time coding by hand, or &amp;#39;by hand + Copilot completions enabled&amp;#39;. And yes, I will use spec driven development with SpecKit + OpenCode, or just straight up &amp;#39;vibe code&amp;#39; on occasion but so far I am unwilling to abdicate my responsibility to understand code and abandon the knowledge of how to write it. Heck, I even bought a couple of new LISP and Java books lately to bone up on various corners of those respectively. And I…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Educators have noted that removing modern luxuries, such as using line editors and assembly, forces students to plan and internalize logic in ways high-level tools do not &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811531&quot; title=&quot;I am this very term teaching 18-year-old students 6502 assembly programming using an emulated Apple II Plus. They&amp;#39;ve had intro to Python, data structures, and OO programming courses using a modern programming environment. Now, they are programming a chip from the seventies using an editor/assembler that was written in 1983 and has a line editor, not a full-screen one. We had a total of 10 hours of class + lab where I taught them about assembly language and told them about the registers,…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, though critics question how new developers can realistically gain this &amp;#34;old hand&amp;#34; experience at scale &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810919&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If you have never written and maintained a complex project by hand, you should not be allowed to be involved in the development of production bound code. So only the old hands allowed from now on, or how are we going to provide these learning opportunities at scale for new developers? Serious question.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811506&quot; title=&quot;Why shouldn&amp;#39;t someone consult some kind of external resource for help, after struggling with a specific coding problem for 20 minutes? Why is 6 hours the right amount of time to timebox this to?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nasaforce.gov/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;NASA Force&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nasaforce.gov)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807209&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;324 points · 309 comments · by LorenDB&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NASA has launched NASA Force, a new hiring initiative in partnership with the Office of Personnel Management that offers highly skilled technologists and engineers limited-time, mission-critical term appointments to solve complex challenges in spaceflight, aeronautics, and scientific discovery. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nasaforce.gov/&quot; title=&quot;Title: NASA Force    URL Source: https://nasaforce.gov/    Markdown Content:  # NASA Force  [Skip to main content](https://nasaforce.gov/#main-content)    An official website of the United States government    [![Image 1: NASA Force](https://nasaforce.gov/nasa-force-logo.svg)](https://nasaforce.gov/)    [JOIN NOW](https://www.nasa.gov/careers/nasaforce/#how-to-apply)    [JOIN NOW](https://www.nasa.gov/careers/nasaforce/#how-to-apply)    # BUILD THE FUTURE OF HUMANITY    Four DAYS. Limited Spots.    ![Image 2: NASA…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#34;NASA Force&amp;#34; initiative is viewed by some as a clever recruitment strategy to attract talent during a period of perceived budget instability and prestige-driven hiring &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807801&quot; title=&quot;Two things: - I like the rolling Moon animation very much. - This seems like a clever way of getting talent involved during a budget squeeze, presumably with the hope that some of those they attract will still be around after this congress and the agency can stabilize once again. I guess it&amp;#39;s also a neat kind of try-before-you-buy for both sides. NASA is prestigious and one of the very few places one could do purely science-focused aerospace engineering, but it&amp;#39;s still a government job under…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue the landing page is a &amp;#34;vibe coded&amp;#34; PR stunt that lacks substance, featuring confusing copy and a lack of diverse job openings for non-engineers or remote workers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807994&quot; title=&quot;Why is this called Nasa Force when the linked job is for an Areospace Engineer? The usa.jobs site only shows 15 open reqs for Nasa, and they are almost all engineering roles, save a few accounting/finance ones. Does that mean there are legitimately no other jobs open for tech-related folks? What is the point of the fancy landing page (that provides zero actual info) if that&amp;#39;s the case? No Data Science or developer openings for tech folk that don&amp;#39;t have Abet certified engineering degrees? I&amp;#39;d…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47808070&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; NASA Force technologists inside the systems that power American spaceflight, aeronautics, and scientific discovery. Am I an idiot or does their leading sentence make absolutely no sense?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47808307&quot; title=&quot;This website is vibe coded&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users debate whether NASA is facing a genuine budget squeeze or merely a plateau &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810408&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; budget squeeze &amp;gt;&amp;gt; will still be around after this congress and the agency can stabilize once again 2026 budget - 24.4 billion 2025 budget - 24.8 billion 2024 budget - 25.3 billion 2023 budget - 25.3 billion 2022 budget - 24.0 billion 2021 budget - 23.2 billion 2020 budget - 22.6 billion 2019 budget - 21.5 billion 2018 budget - 20.7 billion 2017 budget - 19.6 billion 2016 budget - 19.2 billion What part of these numbers are you interpreting as some sort of insane budget restriction?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47808829&quot; title=&quot;That’s not even remotely true and is a trite dismissal of legitimate criticism. Further, even though this might be an exciting concept, when put in the context of the massive budget cuts to nasa specifically it’s hard to fully celebrate what might be more a PR stunt than a meaningful commitment to science and exploration.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that the agency&amp;#39;s strict geographic requirements and specialized engineering needs remain a barrier for general tech workers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47808535&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I&amp;#39;d love to work for Nasa, but I live in Portland, OR. Does this geo basically disqualify me from ever joining Nasa Yes. And it always did since the 1950s unless you were interested in relocating. Ffs aerospace engineering cannot be done remotely, and that too in a city with a nonexistent aerospace industry. &amp;gt; Does that mean there are legitimately no other jobs open for tech-related folks? What is the point of the fancy landing page (that provides zero actual info) if that&amp;#39;s the case? No Data…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809033&quot; title=&quot;Thanks. I was dual questioning people that likely knew the answer and lamenting my life&amp;#39;s decisions. I have no doubt that modern engineering students have CS know-how. It&amp;#39;s almost a requirement for the modern world. But I was curious if there were roles for things like simulation, embedded software, etc.  or even general scientists that may not fall under traditional engineering. This was mainly conditional on the website&amp;#39;s approach to vaguity.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/smol-machines/smolvm&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Smol machines – subsecond coldstart, portable virtual machines&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47808268&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;482 points · 144 comments · by binsquare&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Smolvm is a CLI tool for building and running portable, hardware-isolated Linux microVMs that feature sub-second cold starts and elastic memory usage on macOS and Linux. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/smol-machines/smolvm&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - smol-machines/smolvm: Tool to build &amp;amp; run portable, lightweight, self-contained virtual machines.    URL Source: https://github.com/smol-machines/smolvm    Markdown Content:  # GitHub - smol-machines/smolvm: Tool to build &amp;amp; run portable, lightweight, self-contained virtual machines. · GitHub    [Skip to content](https://github.com/smol-machines/smolvm#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [](https://github.com/)    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Smol machines aims to replace Docker containers with micro-VMs that achieve sub-second cold starts by utilizing a &amp;#34;brute-force&amp;#34; trimmed Linux kernel &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47808326&quot; title=&quot;Hello, I&amp;#39;m building a replacement for docker containers with a virtual machine with the ergonomics of containers + subsecond start times. I worked in AWS previously in the container space + with firecracker. I realized the container is an unnecessary layer that slowed things down + firecracker was a technology designed for AWS org structure + usecase. So I ended up building a hybrid taking the best of containers with the best of firecracker. Let me know your thoughts, thanks!&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47808660&quot; title=&quot;its a really innovative idea! very interested in the subsecond coldstart claim, how does it achieve that?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47808719&quot; title=&quot;@binsquare basically brute-force trimmed down unnecessary linux kernel modules, tried to get the vm started with just bare minimum. There are more rooms for improvement for sure. We will keep trying!&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While users are impressed by the performance, some criticize the current lack of support for nested virtualization and Docker-in-VM workflows, though the creator plans to address the latter in a future release &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809554&quot; title=&quot;Basically any open source project nowadays run their software stack in containers often requiring docker compose. Unfortunatley Smol machines do not support Docker inside the microvms and they also do not support nested VMs for things that use Vagrant. I think this is a big drawback.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809571&quot; title=&quot;I can support docker - will ship a compatible kernel with the necessary flags in the next release.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a strong request for live migration capabilities to support non-cloud-native workloads that require moving running VMs between hosts for maintenance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809911&quot; title=&quot;What is the status of supporting live migration? That&amp;#39;s the one feature of similar systems that always gets left out.  I understand why: it&amp;#39;s not a priority for &amp;#39;cloud native&amp;#39; workloads.  The world, however, has work loads that are not cloud native, because that comes at a high cost, and it always will.  So if you&amp;#39;d like a real value-add differentiator for your micro-VM platform (beyond what I believe you already have,) there you go. Otherwise this looks pretty compelling.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810085&quot; title=&quot;I mean making any given VM stop on host A and appear on host B; e.g. standard Qemu/KVM: virsh migrate --live GuestName DestinationURL This is feasible when network storage is available and useful when a host needs to be drained for maintenance.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/finmoorhouse/status/2044933442236776794&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hyperscalers have already outspent most famous US megaprojects&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807619&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;281 points · 275 comments · by nowflux&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Major technology hyperscalers have surpassed the investment levels of the most famous historical U.S. megaprojects. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/finmoorhouse/status/2044933442236776794&quot; title=&quot;Title: Fin Moorhouse on X: &amp;#39;The hyperscalers have already outspent the most famous US megaprojects https://t.co/D54qD8kO61&amp;#39; / X    URL Source: https://twitter.com/finmoorhouse/status/2044933442236776794    Published Time: Sat, 18 Apr 2026 05:31:44 GMT    Markdown Content:  Don’t miss what’s happening    People on X are the first to know.    [Log in](https://x.com/login)    [Sign up](https://x.com/i/flow/signup)    ## [](https://x.com/)    ## Post    ## Conversation    [Fin…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While hyperscaler spending on AI appears massive, commenters argue that adjusting for GDP makes historical projects like railroads far more significant &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807926&quot; title=&quot;This tweet shows it as a percentage of US GDP: https://x.com/paulg/status/2045120274551423142 Makes it a little less dramatic.  But also shows what a big **&amp;#39;n deal the railroads were!&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47808161&quot; title=&quot;But doesn&amp;#39;t that overstate it in the other direction? Talking about investments in proportion to GDP back when any estimate of GDP probably wasn&amp;#39;t a good measure of total economic output? We&amp;#39;re talking about the period before modern finance, before income taxes, back when most labor was agricultural... Did the average person shoulder the cost of railroads more than the average taxpayer today is shouldering the cost of F-35? (That&amp;#39;s another line in Paul&amp;#39;s post.)&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. A critical distinction is the rapid depreciation of GPUs (roughly six years) compared to the century-long utility of bridges or dams, suggesting current annual spending is actually more intense than past megaprojects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811382&quot; title=&quot;GDP adjustments are warranted, but it is more stark than both the estimates suggest. The megaprojects of the previous generations all had decades long depreciation schedules. Many 50-100+ year old railways, bridges, tunnels or dams and other utilities  are still in active use with only minimal maintenance Amortized Y-o-Y the current spends would dwarf everything at the reported depreciation schedule of 6(!) years for the GPUs - the largest line item.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Skeptics highlight a lack of immediate economic value compared to historical infrastructure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47808413&quot; title=&quot;The problem is that once built, railroads provided economic value right off the bat. I would love to hear about the economic value being generated by these LLMs. I think a couple years is enough time for us to start putting some actual numbers to the value provided.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt; and warn that, much like the railroad-induced panics of the 19th century, the current AI bubble could lead to a severe, uncushioned financial collapse &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47808555&quot; title=&quot;Fwiw, Railroads were the reason for some of the biggest bank collapses in history. Panic of 1873 was literally called &amp;#39;The Great Depression&amp;#39; (until a greater depression hit). 20 years later was the Panic of 1893. Both were due to over-investment and a bubble bursting, and they took out tons of banks and businesses. We&amp;#39;re seeing exactly the same thing with AI, as there is massive investment creating a bubble without a payoff. We know that the value will lower over time due to how software and…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/apr/16/israel-escalates-attacks-on-medics-in-lebanon-with-deadly-quadruple-tap&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Israel escalates attacks on medics in Lebanon with deadly &amp;#39;quadruple tap&amp;#39;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theguardian.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47806596&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;296 points · 223 comments · by tcp_handshaker&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Israeli airstrikes in southern Lebanon killed four medics and wounded six others in a &amp;#34;quadruple tap&amp;#34; attack targeting successive waves of rescuers. The Lebanese health ministry accused Israel of deliberately targeting healthcare workers, reporting 91 medical staff killed since the conflict began. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/apr/16/israel-escalates-attacks-on-medics-in-lebanon-with-deadly-quadruple-tap&quot; title=&quot;Israel escalates attacks on medics in Lebanon with deadly ‘quadruple tap’    Lebanese health ministry says killing of 91 healthcare workers shows ‘total disregard’ for international law    [Skip to main content](#maincontent)[Skip to navigation](#navigation)    Close dialogue1/4Next imagePrevious imageToggle caption    [Skip to navigation](#navigation)    [Print…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on intense condemnation of Israel&amp;#39;s military tactics, with users questioning how long the international community will tolerate alleged war crimes and why leaders are not facing legal consequences similar to the Nuremberg trials &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811361&quot; title=&quot;How long will the world continue to tolerate Israel&amp;#39;s egregious war crimes?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811457&quot; title=&quot;as long as people keep voting for politicians that are complicit with pro zionist policies&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47812478&quot; title=&quot;Seriously, when ate the war criminals finally dragged before courts and sentenced like their forebears in Nuremberg?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Some participants argue that the term &amp;#34;war crime&amp;#34; is functionally meaningless without military enforcement or recognition of international courts, while others debate the historical roots of the conflict, specifically contesting whether Jewish life under previous Islamic rule was peaceful or characterized by second-class &amp;#34;dhimmi&amp;#34; status &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47812633&quot; title=&quot;Nuremberg was only possible because Germany was invaded succesfully by allied forces. All this war crime talk is nonsense. Either talk about sending your own children to war against Israel, or criticize them in other real terms. There are no war crimes against countries who don&amp;#39;t recognize the ICJ, and even then, unless the judiciary of the country is consenting, a war crime charge isn&amp;#39;t pursued. It isn&amp;#39;t a competition, but I hope you&amp;#39;re neither an American nor a Russian, because if you are,…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47812378&quot; title=&quot;This part https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhimmi Edit: Sorry, I can&amp;#39;t reply to your comment below, for some reason. This part, &amp;gt; Did you know that Jews lived among Muslims for over a thousand years in peace? is revisionist because it paints second-class status for Jews as &amp;#39;peace&amp;#39;. This is ridiculous, a fiction akin to &amp;#39;separate but equal&amp;#39; without even the pretense of equality. Additionally, &amp;gt; The violence started happening when the Zionists wanted the land for themselves, exclusive of the…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant disagreement regarding the definition of Zionism and the credibility of the Israeli military, with critics highlighting reports of civilian torture and systemic lack of accountability for soldier misconduct &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811495&quot; title=&quot;Part of the problem is the conflation of Zionism with genocidal government. There is no room for nuiance. A Zionist can want Israelites to live in peace where they currently are and not harm others, and certainly not commit horrible atrocities against other people. Yet, even this kind of Zionist is under their own genocidal threat, &amp;#39;from the river to the sea&amp;#39;, and instead of their being a sensible perspective of &amp;#39;maybe let&amp;#39;s not kill a bunch of any people&amp;#39;s&amp;#39; we are left with the never ending…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811192&quot; title=&quot;In all your comments, you keep referring to the resistance groups fighting the Israeli occupation as terrorists, which I’m guessing makes you either an Israeli or pro-Israel. The IOF has been notoriously lying about killing and torturing civilians. Not only that, but even soldiers caught red-handed on video raping prisoners have not only gotten away scot-free but also been allowed to rejoin the army. Is there a reason why we should trust anything such a genocidal, morally corrupt organization…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.iqiipi.com/the-quiet-colossus.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ada, its design, and the language that built the languages&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (iqiipi.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47803844&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;283 points · 220 comments · by mpweiher&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ada is a sophisticated, safety-oriented programming language developed by the Department of Defense in 1983 that pioneered modern features like generics, packages, and concurrency decades before they were independently &amp;#34;rediscovered&amp;#34; and adopted by mainstream languages such as Rust, Go, and Java. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.iqiipi.com/the-quiet-colossus.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Quiet Colossus — On Ada, Its Design, and the Language That Built the Languages    URL Source: https://www.iqiipi.com/the-quiet-colossus.html    Published Time: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 09:28:10 GMT    Markdown Content:  # The Quiet Colossus — On Ada, Its Design, and the Language That Built the Languages    Essay · Software &amp;amp; Ideas  # The Quiet    _Colossus_    On Ada, the language that the Department of Defense built, the industry ignored, and every modern language quietly became    There is a language that…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary consensus is that Ada’s failure to achieve mainstream dominance was &amp;#34;overdetermined&amp;#34; by the prohibitive cost of early compilers and the lack of free, open-source alternatives during the rise of microcomputers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47804796&quot; title=&quot;Ada was also ignored because the typical compiler cost tens of thousands of dollars. No open source or free compiler existed during the decades where popular languages could be had for free. I think that is the biggest factor of all.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47804603&quot; title=&quot;Ada is a language that had a lot of useful features much earlier than any of the languages that are popular today, and some of those features are still missing from the languages easily available today. In the beginning Ada has been criticized mainly for 2 reasons, it was claimed that it is too complex and it was criticized for being too verbose. Today, the criticism about complexity seems naive, because many later languages have become much more complex than Ada, in many cases because they…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47804877&quot; title=&quot;Ada’s failure to escape its niche is  overdetermined. Given the sophistication of the language and the compiler technology of the day, there was no way Ada was going to run well on 1980’s microcomputers. Intel built the i432 “mainframe on a chip” with a bunch of Ada concepts baked into the hardware for performance, and it was still as slow as a dog. And as we now know, microcomputers later ate the world, carrying along their C and assembly legacy for the better part of two decades, until they…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users defend Ada&amp;#39;s verbosity as a feature that enhances human readability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47804825&quot; title=&quot;Verbosity is a feature not a bug. Programming is a human activity and thus should use human language and avoid encoded forms that require decoding to understand. The use of abbreviations should be avoided as it obsfucates the meaning and purpose of code from a reader.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue it could have been mitigated with a standardized abbreviated syntax &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47804603&quot; title=&quot;Ada is a language that had a lot of useful features much earlier than any of the languages that are popular today, and some of those features are still missing from the languages easily available today. In the beginning Ada has been criticized mainly for 2 reasons, it was claimed that it is too complex and it was criticized for being too verbose. Today, the criticism about complexity seems naive, because many later languages have become much more complex than Ada, in many cases because they…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics of the linked article point out technical inaccuracies regarding how Ada&amp;#39;s separation of specification and implementation compares to modern languages like JavaScript and Java &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807543&quot; title=&quot;The article states, quoting: &amp;#39;JavaScript&amp;#39;s module system — introduced in 2015, thirty-two years after Ada&amp;#39;s — provides import and export but no mechanism for a type to have a specification whose representation is hidden from importers.&amp;#39; Then: &amp;#39;in Ada, the implementation of a private type is not merely inaccessible, it is syntactically absent from the client&amp;#39;s view of the world.&amp;#39; Am I missing something -- a JavaScript module is perfectly able to declare a private element by simply not exporting…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807621&quot; title=&quot;I find multiple &amp;#39;strange&amp;#39; flaws with the article, even for my appreciation of Ada _and_ the article as an essay: * The article claims only Ada has true separation of implementation vs specification (the interface), but as far as I am able to reason, also e.g. JavaScript is perfectly able to define &amp;#39;private&amp;#39; elements (not exported by an ES6 module) while being usable in the module that declares them -- if this isn&amp;#39;t &amp;#39;syntactical&amp;#39; (and semantical) separation like what is prescribed to Ada, what…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.calif.io/p/mad-bugs-even-cat-readmetxt-is-not&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;quot;cat readme.txt&amp;quot; is not safe if you use iTerm2&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.calif.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809190&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;312 points · 184 comments · by arkadiyt&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A vulnerability in iTerm2’s SSH integration allows malicious files to execute local code via terminal escape sequences that impersonate a trusted &amp;#34;conductor&amp;#34; script. By running `cat` on a specially crafted file, users can inadvertently trigger the terminal to send and execute attacker-controlled commands in their local shell. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.calif.io/p/mad-bugs-even-cat-readmetxt-is-not&quot; title=&quot;Title: MAD Bugs: Even &amp;#39;cat readme.txt&amp;#39; is not safe    URL Source: https://blog.calif.io/p/mad-bugs-even-cat-readmetxt-is-not    Published Time: 2026-04-17T18:24:59+00:00    Markdown Content:  In a previous post about [AI-discovered bugs](https://blog.calif.io/p/mad-bugs-month-of-ai-discovered-bugs) in [Vim and Emacs](https://blog.calif.io/p/mad-bugs-vim-vs-emacs-vs-claude), we looked at how seemingly harmless workflows could cross a surprising line into code execution. This time we wanted to push that…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The vulnerability highlights a recurring conflict between the desire for feature-rich terminals and the inherent security risks of mixing control sequences with user data in a single stream &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811419&quot; title=&quot;This is cool work, but it&amp;#39;s also somewhat unsurprising: this is a recurring problem with fancy, richly-featured terminal apps. I think we had at least ten publicly reported vulns of this type in the past 15 years. We also had vulnerabilities in tools such as less, in text editors such as vim, etc. And notably, many of these are logic bugs - i.e., they are not alleviated by a rewrite to Rust. I don&amp;#39;t know what to do with this. I think there&amp;#39;s this problematic tension between the expectation that…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811876&quot; title=&quot;Well all these bugs (iTerm2’s, prompt injection, SQL injection, XSS) are one class of mistake — you sent out-of-band data in the same stream as the in-band data. If we can get that to raise a red flag with people (and agents), people won’t be trying to put control instructions alongside user content (without considering safeguards) as much.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters debated the ethics of disclosing the exploit before a stable patch was released, especially as AI tools now allow attackers to quickly derive exploits from opaque commit histories &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810518&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; At the time of writing, the fix has not yet reached stable releases. Why was this disclosed before the hole was patched in the stable release? It&amp;#39;s only been 18 days since the bug was reported to upstream, which is much shorter than typical vulnerability disclosure deadlines. The upstream commit ( https://github.com/gnachman/iTerm2/commit/a9e745993c2e2cbb30... ) has way less information than this blog post, so I think releasing this blog post now materially increases the chance that this will…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810917&quot; title=&quot;I guess traditional moratorium period for vulnerability publication is going to be fade away as we rely on AI to find it. If publicly accessible AI model with very cheap fee can find it, it&amp;#39;s very natural to assume the attackers had found it already by the same method.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest that modern terminal APIs or older systems like Plan 9 could solve these &amp;#34;out-of-band&amp;#34; data issues, others note that the industry has struggled for decades to balance remote accessibility with safe graphical capabilities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811986&quot; title=&quot;i think part of the problem is the archaic interface that is needed to enable feature rich terminal apps. what we really want is a modern terminal API that does not rely on in-band command sequences. that is we want terminals that can be programmed like a GUI, but still run in a simple (remote) terminal like before.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811998&quot; title=&quot;plan9 and 9term solved this decades ago, right? https://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/sysadmin/OnTerminal...&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47812621&quot; title=&quot;Graphics. They&amp;#39;re network transparent, and take over the terminal. Terminal apps were obsolete once we had invented the pixel. Unix just provides no good way to write one that can be used remotely.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811974&quot; title=&quot;Back in the PDP-10 days, one communicated with it using a terminal attached to it. One of my fellow students discovered that if you hit backspace enough times, the terminal handler would keep erasing characters before the buffer. Go far enough, and then there was an escape character (Ctrl-u?) that would delete the whole line. Poof went the operating system!&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://electrek.co/2026/04/17/tesla-hw3-owners-be-patient-7-years-fsd/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tesla tells HW3 owner to &amp;#39;be patient&amp;#39; after 7 years of waiting for FSD&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (electrek.co)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809347&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;222 points · 209 comments · by breve&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tesla is facing a collective legal claim from thousands of European owners after telling a customer who paid for &amp;#34;Full Self-Driving&amp;#34; seven years ago to &amp;#34;be patient,&amp;#34; despite admitting that older Hardware 3 computers may require difficult replacements to achieve autonomy. &lt;a href=&quot;https://electrek.co/2026/04/17/tesla-hw3-owners-be-patient-7-years-fsd/&quot; title=&quot;Tesla tells HW3 owner to &amp;#39;be patient&amp;#39; after 7 years of waiting for FSD    The Dutch Tesla owner who launched a collective claim against Tesla over FSD on HW3 cars called Tesla to ask...    [Skip to main content](#main)    Toggle main menu    [Electrek Logo Go to the Electrek home page](https://electrek.co/)     Switch site    * [9to5Mac Logo9to5Mac](https://9to5mac.com/)  * [9to5Google Logo9to5Google](https://9to5google.com/)  * [9to5Toys](https://9to5toys.com/)  * [Drone DJ…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users report vastly different experiences with Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD), with some claiming successful hands-free cross-country trips &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810348&quot; title=&quot;rode with my friend from San Francisco down to San Diego in his Tesla, and he literally didn&amp;#39;t touch the wheel or the pedals the whole time. Then a couple days later we drove back the same way. People don&amp;#39;t talk about these cars driving themselves enough imho&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810614&quot; title=&quot;Barely touching the wheel is a qualitatively different experience than never touching the wheel. HW4 Tesla owners have gone over 10,000 miles without intervening, including a cross-country trip.[1] The car even finds charging/parking spots and parks on its own. The only equivalent I’ve experienced is Waymo, and you can’t buy a Waymo. 1. https://www.tesla.com/customer-stories/cross-country-trip-fu...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt; while others find the system so unpredictable that it is more exhausting than manual driving &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810617&quot; title=&quot;Did a trial for a month. It&amp;#39;s indeed very impressive but at the same time, it&amp;#39;s also very stressful because you don&amp;#39;t know how the car is going to react. So I was on constant alert if there were any tricky situations. After some time, it became exhausting and more draining then manual driving.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue Tesla offers a unique level of automation compared to competitors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810614&quot; title=&quot;Barely touching the wheel is a qualitatively different experience than never touching the wheel. HW4 Tesla owners have gone over 10,000 miles without intervening, including a cross-country trip.[1] The car even finds charging/parking spots and parks on its own. The only equivalent I’ve experienced is Waymo, and you can’t buy a Waymo. 1. https://www.tesla.com/customer-stories/cross-country-trip-fu...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810550&quot; title=&quot;Which car? Seems like Tesla has the best version although I suppose it depends on the circumstances of the trip.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, skeptics point out that other brands have similar features &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810466&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve driven from Dallas to Houston barely having to touch the wheel or pedals the whole way. I don&amp;#39;t own a Tesla. Other brands have had self driving features for years now. Some even operate at a higher level of automation.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt; and question the validity of Tesla’s promotional success stories &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810643&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t trust anything Tesla posts on their website about self driving. They&amp;#39;ve been known to post entirely fictional stories about their self driving. Crazy you still choose to believe them after they&amp;#39;ve been known to so brazenly lie there.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810959&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know who David Moss is, I have no reason to trust him. His tweets I can see are practically nothing but Tesla and Grok shill posts.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. This divide is further complicated by a lack of trust in Elon Musk’s leadership and the perceived gap between marketing promises and the reality for long-time owners &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811516&quot; title=&quot;Full disclosure. I am currently shorting TSLA so take what I am about to post with an appropriate amount of salt. I gotta say I am continuously amazed how much Musk is allowed to get away with. I know he can get some things done and he is, apparently, skilled manager, fund raiser and bs&amp;#39;er of epic proportions, but I have a hard time understanding how all this didn&amp;#39;t catch up to him yet.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810643&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t trust anything Tesla posts on their website about self driving. They&amp;#39;ve been known to post entirely fictional stories about their self driving. Crazy you still choose to believe them after they&amp;#39;ve been known to so brazenly lie there.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://awnist.com/slop-cop&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Slop Cop&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (awnist.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47806845&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;245 points · 160 comments · by ericHosick&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Slop Cop is a browser-based writing editor designed to identify and flag rhetorical patterns common in generic AI-generated prose, with optional API integration for deeper analysis and automated editing. &lt;a href=&quot;https://awnist.com/slop-cop&quot; title=&quot;Title: Slop Cop    URL Source: https://awnist.com/slop-cop    Markdown Content:  Slop Cop is a writing editor that flags rhetorical and structural patterns common in generic LLM prose. It runs entirely in the browser, and you can add an Anthropic API key to run deeper analysis and enable auto-edits.    Here&amp;#39;s an example:    In an era of unprecedented digital transformation, it is crucial to understand the multifaceted landscape of modern technology. This comprehensive overview will delve into the robust…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a consensus that the primary issue with &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; is not specific vocabulary, but the tendency of LLMs to expand simple thoughts into excessive, pointless filler &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811870&quot; title=&quot;Like the original Grammarly, I think this can be useful for business writing because these tools help you get to the point. Many students are rewarded for using flowery language in school essays, but if you&amp;#39;re composing an email or writing a design doc, just optimize for reading time and clarity. But for general use, I think this is misguided. The problem with LLM output is not that it&amp;#39;s using em dashes or words such as &amp;#39;crucial&amp;#39;. It&amp;#39;s that most LLM articles on LinkedIn or on personal blogs…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47812017&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; &amp;#39;I had a shower thought and I asked a chatbot to write five pages of text about it.&amp;#39; I don&amp;#39;t need prettier words, I need there to be fewer of them? Always judge an author by the length of their text. Decades of insights barely condensed into 200 pages? Great! Hours of thought expanded into 200 pages? Very bad. Same length of text but lands very differently. Same is true for emails, tweets, videos, and even just talking. Say less! But not too little either.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that brevity is essential for professional clarity, others warn that over-prioritizing short text can reward &amp;#34;charlatans&amp;#34; who avoid necessary nuance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47812017&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; &amp;#39;I had a shower thought and I asked a chatbot to write five pages of text about it.&amp;#39; I don&amp;#39;t need prettier words, I need there to be fewer of them? Always judge an author by the length of their text. Decades of insights barely condensed into 200 pages? Great! Hours of thought expanded into 200 pages? Very bad. Same length of text but lands very differently. Same is true for emails, tweets, videos, and even just talking. Say less! But not too little either.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47813045&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Always judge an author by the length of their text. Flashbacks to a past employer where the CEO decided that brevity was a core company value and started rewarding people for short communications and scolding us for longer text. Over the next year a few charlatans moved up the ranks by spitting out half-baked thoughts and e-mails all the time, which looked like clarity and brevity on the surface. People were afraid to speak out or discuss nuance because it was too many words, and you didn&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47812049&quot; title=&quot;Tangential, but I remember when I was studying for the ACT, there was something in one of the practice books that stuck with me. I&amp;#39;m paraphrasing but it was something like &amp;#39;Good writing is clear and easy to understand.  It&amp;#39;s about communication, make sure you communicate&amp;#39;. It was something that I guess I logically knew but hadn&amp;#39;t fully realized.  I had always tried to be fancy with my writing and pad it out to meet minimum word counts, with &amp;#39;understand-ability&amp;#39; being somewhat of an…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters also note that many LLM tropes—such as flowery language and clichés—were already common among human writers seeking to sound sophisticated without having much to say &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809549&quot; title=&quot;It seems relevant that a lot of these things were fairly notorious clichés even before LLMs, which just intensified the phenomenon. They were what people tended to do who wanted to sound smart and sophisticated but didn&amp;#39;t have a developed voice or anything in particular to say. Indeed, I&amp;#39;m fairly sure this is why LLMs sound like this.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47812788&quot; title=&quot;Anyone over the age of 25 actually developed their writing style before ChatGPT came about. Getting all uppity about these surface-level LLM ‘tropes’ is just stupid. I am thankfully yet to run into a situation where someone with this attitude is actually in a position to be able to negatively affect my life. I’m sure that there’s a correlation. Take the “ew, em-dash” stuff back to Twitter.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47812333&quot; title=&quot;As a senior engineer I spend a lot of time reviewing and approving technical designs, PRDs etc. Over the years the amount of basic copy editing I have to do has really grown.  I sometimes feel like I’m removing 20%+ of the text.  And that was before LLMs.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/75848&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Middle schooler finds coin from Troy in Berlin&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (thehistoryblog.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47806484&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;268 points · 125 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/75848&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discovery of a coin from Troy in Berlin highlights the city&amp;#39;s long-standing historical significance as a destination for ancient Greek and Roman &amp;#34;tourists&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47806878&quot; title=&quot;I knew vaguely that Troy had many layers of settlement, but I didn&amp;#39;t realize that Troy had an extensive life in antiquity that extended into the classical Greek age (Post-Bronze Age) and Early Roman Age. It&amp;#39;s funny to think of Roman and Greek Tourists visiting Troy VIII in 300 BC.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807266&quot; title=&quot;Was there anything resembling tourism in 300 BC?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters noted that while finding millennia-old artifacts is a unique aspect of living in Europe &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807588&quot; title=&quot;Can&amp;#39;t even imagine what it&amp;#39;s like to live in Europe. Just casually going on a walk and finding a coin that is over 2 millennia old. Just another Tuesday.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807760&quot; title=&quot;As a child I was walking down the street and kicked something by chance that sounded metallic. 150 year old coin, irrc. Just there on the asphalt next to the sidewalk. Unfortunately bronze, with trimmed edges, common mint and worth very little. But if you tell me someone just stumbles onto and old coin in the street just lime that, I pretty much believe it.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, similar accidental discoveries of ancient items, such as flint arrowheads or megafauna fossils, occur in the United States &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807628&quot; title=&quot;You can walk around the USA and find flint arrowheads ... not sure the Native Americans used coins as such.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47808054&quot; title=&quot;Downtown Los Angeles has a pretty famous park and museum with fossils of preserved megafauna that have been extinct for millennia still regularly found just chilling in a bubbling lake of oil. I even worked there 25 years ago.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also speculation regarding the coin&amp;#39;s origin, with some questioning if it was a lost collector&amp;#39;s item and others sharing anecdotes about valuable currency being spent by people unaware of its historical worth &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807874&quot; title=&quot;When I was a teenager I was working at McDonalds and someone came in and paid for a meal using old US Silver Certificate bills. Some people just are careless and don&amp;#39;t notice old or unusual things.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807324&quot; title=&quot;No information about the kid who found it? Did he get some reward for finding it? Does it come from some archeological site around there or some collector just lost it there?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/paniclock/paniclock/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: PanicLock – Close your MacBook lid disable TouchID –&amp;gt; password unlock&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807809&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;256 points · 113 comments · by seanieb&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PanicLock is a new tool for MacBooks that automatically disables TouchID and requires a password for entry whenever the laptop lid is closed, providing enhanced legal and data protection against compelled biometric unlocks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/paniclock/paniclock/&quot; title=&quot;I wrote this after the case of a Washington Post reporter, Hannah Natanson, was compelled to unlock her computer with her fingerprint. This resulted in access to her Desktop Signal on her computer, revealing sources and their conversations.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.yahoo.com&amp;amp;#x2F;news&amp;amp;#x2F;articles&amp;amp;#x2F;washington-post-raid-proves-face-153402560.html&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.yahoo.com&amp;amp;#x2F;news&amp;amp;#x2F;articles&amp;amp;#x2F;washington-post-raid-pro...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Edit: I&amp;amp;#x27;ve a lot more…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the legal and security advantages of forcing password-only authentication, as law enforcement can often legally compel biometric unlocks but not the disclosure of a password &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47808541&quot; title=&quot;Neat idea. I remember way back in the day, there was some question as to the legality of compelled unlocking of devices; IIRC, it’s been deemed legal to compel a fingerprint, but illegal (under the first amendment?) to compel entry of a password—IIRC, as long as that password hasn’t been written down anywhere. I gather this is written to that end primarily? Or is there some other goal as well?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809696&quot; title=&quot;Take it to the logical end - you can tie up / handcuff / sedate / restrain an individual in order to get their fingerprint (or, ahem, way worse) but you cannot extract a password from someones brain.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47808616&quot; title=&quot;I wrote this after the case of a Washington Post reporter, Hannah Natanson, was compelled to unlock her computer with her fingerprint. This resulted in access to her Desktop Signal on her computer, revealing sources and their conversations. https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/washington-post-raid-pro... Edit: I&amp;#39;ve a lot more details about the legality and precedence on the apps landing page https://paniclock.github.io/&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While users appreciate the tool for protecting against physical coercion or unauthorized recording in public &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809530&quot; title=&quot;This is great. I see many times &amp;#39;security advice&amp;#39; against biometrics replacing password unlock, but most of the time I am more worried about getting recorded by somebody/something while typing a password in the open than anything else. This makes it better for those other cases.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, some suggest that high-level threat models require full hibernation or memory wiping to ensure data is not retrievable from RAM &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811203&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; in sensitive situations, law enforcement and border agents in many countries can compel a biometric unlock in ways they cannot with a password. If the threat model includes state-level actors, then disabling biometrics won&amp;#39;t prevent data from being retrieved from physical memory. It would probably be wiser to enable disk encryption and have a panic button that powers down/hibernates the computer so that no unencrypted data remains on RAM. The website says shutdown &amp;#39;takes time&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;kills your…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47810588&quot; title=&quot;This would be perfect if it could monitor the force with which the lid is closed (macs have accelerometers after all, either this info or an acceptable proxy could be derived?). Gently close? no action. Stronger, faster action? Disable touch ID Slam shut in full panic? yeah disable all biometrics, lose all state, even wipe the ram and the filevault key if it&amp;#39;s an option&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. For those seeking alternatives, commenters noted that iOS has a built-in shortcut for this function &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47808737&quot; title=&quot;PSA to iOS users: if you tap the lock  button 5x it forces password-only unlocking. Useful at protests or any precarious situations with law enforcement.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, and similar results can be achieved on macOS via command-line scripts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47808851&quot; title=&quot;Great idea and implementation! If you are hesitant to install this for any reason, you can accomplish the same thing with this one liner: sudo bioutil -ws -u 0; sleep 1; sudo bioutil -ws -u 1 Edit: here&amp;#39;s a shortcut to run the above and then lock your screen. You can give it a global keyboard shortcut in the Shortcuts app. https://www.icloud.com/shortcuts/9362945d839140dbbf987e5bce9...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://antithesis.com/blog/2026/skiptrees/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What are skiplists good for?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (antithesis.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47806021&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;275 points · 66 comments · by mfiguiere&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Antithesis engineers solved the problem of slow, recursive tree lookups in Google BigQuery by implementing &amp;#34;skiptrees,&amp;#34; a variation of skiplists that uses hierarchical tables and fixed joins to efficiently query ancestral paths in $O(\log n)$ time without requiring an OLTP database. &lt;a href=&quot;https://antithesis.com/blog/2026/skiptrees/&quot; title=&quot;Title: What are skiplists good for?    URL Source: https://antithesis.com/blog/2026/skiptrees/    Published Time: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 15:32:09 GMT    Markdown Content:  [← Blog](https://antithesis.com/blog)  A while back, I joined Phil Eaton’s [book club](https://eatonphil.com/bookclub.html) on _The Art of Multiprocessor Programming_, and the topic of [skiplists](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skip_list) came up.    For most of my career, skiplists had always seemed like a niche data structure, with a rabid…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Skiplists are valued for their simple implementation compared to balanced trees and their superior performance in concurrent, lock-free environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47821949&quot; title=&quot;Skiplists have some nice properties - the code is fairly short and easy to understand, for one. Qt&amp;#39;s QMap used to be skip list based, here&amp;#39;s the rationale given for it: https://doc.qt.io/archives/qq/qq19-containers.html#associati...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823009&quot; title=&quot;Redis sorted sets are probably the most widely deployed example. Redis uses a skiplist for range queries and ordered iteration paired with a hash table for O(1) lookups. Together they cover the full API at the right complexity for each operation Skiplists also win over balanced BSTs when it comes to concurrent access. Lock-free implementations are much simplier to reason about and get right. ConcurrentSkipListMap has been in the standard library since Java 6 for exactly this reason and it holds…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824450&quot; title=&quot;yeah it turns out that complex code, when its properly encapsulated and implemented in a bug-free manner, is not such a cost after all. A correct skiplist is easier to NIH than a correct red-black tree (which for me was the final boss of the DS class in college), but has performance edge cases a red-black tree doesnt, if you treat it like a search tree.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While critics argue they are less efficient than B+ trees on modern hardware due to excessive pointer dereferencing, proponents highlight their excellence in fast intersections and range queries, particularly in Redis and search indexing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822450&quot; title=&quot;On practical machines they aren&amp;#39;t good for much. To access a value in a skip list you have to dereference way more pointers than in a b+ tree. On paper they&amp;#39;re about the same, but in practice the binary tree will tend to outperform. You get way more work done per IO operation.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823009&quot; title=&quot;Redis sorted sets are probably the most widely deployed example. Redis uses a skiplist for range queries and ordered iteration paired with a hash table for O(1) lookups. Together they cover the full API at the right complexity for each operation Skiplists also win over balanced BSTs when it comes to concurrent access. Lock-free implementations are much simplier to reason about and get right. ConcurrentSkipListMap has been in the standard library since Java 6 for exactly this reason and it holds…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823060&quot; title=&quot;Skiplists are designed for fast intersection, not for single value lookup (assuming a sane design that&amp;#39;s not based on linked lists, that&amp;#39;s just an educational device that&amp;#39;s never used in practice). They are extremely good at intersections, as you can use the skip pointers in clever ways to skip ahead and eliminate whole swathes of values.  You can kinda do that with b-trees[1] as well, but skip lists can beat them out in many cases. It&amp;#39;s highly dependent on the shape of the data though.  For…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite their historical use in libraries like Qt to minimize binary size, many implementations have since reverted to red-black trees as the benefits of simpler code are often outweighed by performance edge cases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47821949&quot; title=&quot;Skiplists have some nice properties - the code is fairly short and easy to understand, for one. Qt&amp;#39;s QMap used to be skip list based, here&amp;#39;s the rationale given for it: https://doc.qt.io/archives/qq/qq19-containers.html#associati...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823024&quot; title=&quot;It seems like Qt went from red-black tree to skip list in Qt4 and back to red-black tree in Qt5.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824450&quot; title=&quot;yeah it turns out that complex code, when its properly encapsulated and implemented in a bug-free manner, is not such a cost after all. A correct skiplist is easier to NIH than a correct red-black tree (which for me was the final boss of the DS class in college), but has performance edge cases a red-black tree doesnt, if you treat it like a search tree.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47826215&quot; title=&quot;I think it was more about binary size. There are a few sentences in the Qt containers documentation about them being &amp;#39;optimized to minimize code expansion&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.discourse.org/2026/04/discourse-is-not-going-closed-source/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Discourse Is Not Going Closed Source&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.discourse.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47802233&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;210 points · 82 comments · by sams99&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Discourse has reaffirmed its commitment to remaining open source, rejecting Cal.com&amp;#39;s recent decision to close its codebase due to AI-driven security risks by arguing that transparency and AI-powered defensive scanning actually strengthen software security. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.discourse.org/2026/04/discourse-is-not-going-closed-source/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Discourse is Not Going Closed Source    URL Source: https://blog.discourse.org/2026/04/discourse-is-not-going-closed-source/    Published Time: 2026-04-17T03:17:55.000Z    Markdown Content:  # Discourse is Not Going Closed Source    [](https://discourse.org/)    ×  *   [About](https://blog.discourse.org/2026/04/discourse-is-not-going-closed-source/#)      *   [What is Discourse?](https://discourse.org/about)      *   [Who we are](https://discourse.org/team)      *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether framing business decisions as security imperatives constitutes &amp;#34;bad faith,&amp;#34; with some arguing that intentional misdirection to gain &amp;#34;brownie points&amp;#34; is a deceptive but standard business practice &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47802403&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I want to be fair to Cal.com here, because I don’t think they’re acting in bad faith. I just think the security argument is a convenient frame for decisions that are actually about something else. […] Framing a business decision as a security imperative does a disservice to the open-source ecosystem that helped Cal.com get to where they are. That sure sounds like bad faith to me.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47802608&quot; title=&quot;Framing a business decision as a security imperative sure sounds like intent to mislead to me.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47802498&quot; title=&quot;Covering something up is not bad faith. PR firms do it all the time (though plenty more do things in bad faith too). If what you&amp;#39;re covering up is an explicitly user-hostile decision then maybe that&amp;#39;s bad faith if what you&amp;#39;re trying to do is trick people. But if you&amp;#39;re just lying for brownie points then that&amp;#39;s not always bad faith, just dumb.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47802726&quot; title=&quot;Misdirection is normal business practice. For example, Quadpay/Zipco recently made a change where instead of appraising your credit independently for each of their plans, they calculate a total amount you&amp;#39;re allowed to have in flight at any given time, and share that across everything. In their FAQ, there is an entry for &amp;#39;Is my purchasing power going down?&amp;#39; and the answer is some bullshit like &amp;#39;Your purchasing power is unified for a simpler and more streamlined experience bla bla&amp;#39; which doesn&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users debate the semantic definition of bad faith versus &amp;#34;lawyerspeak,&amp;#34; others emphasize that open-source transparency should ideally create a healthy urgency for security &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47802454&quot; title=&quot;Bad faith requires you to intend it badly, though, not just for it to be bad.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47802484&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Open source creates a useful urgency: when your code is public, you assume it  will be examined closely, so you invest earlier and more aggressively in finding and fixing issues before attackers do. This should be the mentality of every company doing open source.Great points made.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47802732&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t agree with your definition here. Good faith means trying to be correct but potentially not being by accident. Intentionally lying is bad faith and by definition trying to trick people; you know the truth is one thing, but you&amp;#39;re saying something else to try to get them to believe it.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Separately, the thread features a detailed critique of Discourse&amp;#39;s user experience, citing issues with its heavy JavaScript requirements, poor search functionality, and &amp;#34;Alzheimer&amp;#39;s-like&amp;#34; scrolling behavior in long threads &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47803979&quot; title=&quot;too bad. i wish they would go closedsource so that maybe everyone would stop using it. it&amp;#39;s dogshit for countless reasons. including: - refuses to even load on browser engines older than 2 years. for a webforum that&amp;#39;s absolutely appaling. there&amp;#39;s a barebones non-JS version. but it only loads for individual threads (not the forum homepage or anything else), so they must be linked to directly (e.g from a websearch engine) - every single page navigation triggers the circle animation which blocks…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-04-16</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-04-16</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-7&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Claude Opus 4.7&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (anthropic.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793411&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1952 points&lt;/strong&gt; · &lt;strong&gt;1443 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by meetpateltech&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic has released Claude Opus 4.7, featuring significant improvements in software engineering, instruction following, and high-resolution vision. The model introduces new &amp;#34;xhigh&amp;#34; effort controls and advanced cybersecurity safeguards while maintaining the same pricing as its predecessor, Opus 4.6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-7&quot; title=&quot;Title: Introducing Claude Opus 4.7    URL Source: https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-7    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1](https://www.anthropic.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww-cdn.anthropic.com%2Fimages%2F4zrzovbb%2Fwebsite%2F96ea2509a90e527642c822303e56296a07bcfce4-1920x1080.png&amp;amp;w=3840&amp;amp;q=75)    Our latest model, Claude Opus 4.7, is now generally available.    Opus 4.7 is a notable improvement on Opus 4.6 in advanced software engineering, with particular gains on the most difficult tasks.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of Claude Opus 4.7 has sparked confusion and frustration among users regarding the new &amp;#34;adaptive thinking&amp;#34; feature, which some find difficult to configure and others blame for a perceived decline in model performance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47794768&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m finding the &amp;#39;adaptive thinking&amp;#39; thing very confusing, especially having written code against the previous thinking budget / thinking effort / etc modes: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/adapti... Also notable: 4.7 now defaults to NOT including a human-readable reasoning token summary in the output, you have to add &amp;#39;display&amp;#39;: &amp;#39;summarized&amp;#39; to get that: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/adapti... (Still trying to get a decent pelican out of this one but…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47796722&quot; title=&quot;Its especially concerning / frustrating because boris’s reply to my bug report on opus being dumber was “we think adaptive thinking isnt working” and then thats the last I heard of it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47668520 Now disabling adaptive thinking plus increasing effort seem to be what has gotten me back to baseline performance but “our internal evals look good“ is not good enough right now for what many others have corroborated seeing&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47794755&quot; title=&quot;This comment thread is a good learner for founders; look at how much anguish can be put to bed with just a little honest communication. 1. Oops, we&amp;#39;re oversubscribed. 2. Oops, adaptive reasoning landed poorly / we have to do it for capacity reasons. 3. Here&amp;#39;s how subscriptions work. Am I really writing this bullet point? As someone with a production application pinned on Opus 4.5, it is extremely difficult to tell apart what is code harness drama and what is a problem with the underlying model.…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While the model demonstrates improved self-awareness regarding its own logical fallacies—such as failing to realize a car must be driven to a car wash—users report significant issues with hallucinations, overly restrictive cybersecurity filters, and a lack of transparency from Anthropic regarding capacity constraints &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793692&quot; title=&quot;Too late, personally after how bad 4.6 was the past week I was pushed to codex, which seems to mostly work at the same level from day to day. Just last night I was trying to get 4.6 to lookup how to do some simple tensor parallel work, and the agent used 0 web fetches and just hallucinated 17K very wrong tokens. Then the main agent decided to pretend to implement tp, and just copied the entire model to each node...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47796531&quot; title=&quot;Input: I want to wash my car. The car wash is 50 meters away. Should I walk or drive? Output: Walk. It&amp;#39;ll take you under a minute, and driving 50 meters barely gets the engine warm — plus you&amp;#39;d just have to park again at the other end. Honestly, by the time you started the car, you&amp;#39;d already be there on foot. --- I asked it to figure out why it made the mistake: &amp;#39;Physical/spatial common sense. Exactly what just happened — I pattern-matched &amp;#39;50 meters, walk vs drive&amp;#39; to a pedestrian trip and…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47794908&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;ve increased their cybersecurity usage filters to the point that Opus 4.7 refuses to work on any valid work, even after web fetching the program guidelines itself and acknowledging &amp;#39;This is authorized research under the [Redacted] Bounty program, so the findings here are defensive research outputs, not malware. I&amp;#39;ll analyze and draft, not weaponize anything beyond what&amp;#39;s needed to prove the bug to [Redacted]. I will immediately switch over to Codex if this continues to be an issue. I am…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Consequently, some developers are migrating to competitors like Codex, citing more consistent performance and better compute availability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793692&quot; title=&quot;Too late, personally after how bad 4.6 was the past week I was pushed to codex, which seems to mostly work at the same level from day to day. Just last night I was trying to get 4.6 to lookup how to do some simple tensor parallel work, and the agent used 0 web fetches and just hallucinated 17K very wrong tokens. Then the main agent decided to pretend to implement tp, and just copied the entire model to each node...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793870&quot; title=&quot;Funny because many people here were so confident that OpenAI is going to collapse because of how much compute they pre-ordered. But now it seems like it&amp;#39;s a major strategic advantage. They&amp;#39;re 2x&amp;#39;ing usage limits on Codex plans to steal CC customers and it seems to be working. I&amp;#39;m seeing a lot of goodwill for Codex and a ton of bad PR for CC. It seems like 90% of Claude&amp;#39;s recent problems are strictly lack of compute related.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.6-35b-a3b&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic coding power, now open to all&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (qwen.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47792764&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1266 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 531 comments · by cmitsakis&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alibaba has open-sourced Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, a sparse mixture-of-experts model with 3 billion active parameters that delivers high-performance agentic coding and multimodal reasoning. The model rivals much larger dense models and is now available via open weights, Qwen Studio, and the Alibaba Cloud API. &lt;a href=&quot;https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.6-35b-a3b&quot; title=&quot;Title: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic Coding Power, Now Open to All    URL Source: https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.6-35b-a3b    Published Time: 2026-04-15T10:00:00+08:00    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B Main Image](https://qianwen-res.oss-accelerate.aliyuncs.com/Qwen3.6/Figures/3.6_35b_a3b_banner.png)  [QWEN STUDIO](https://chat.qwen.ai/)[HUGGING…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Qwen 3.6 release has sparked excitement for its agentic coding capabilities, with early users reporting it can outperform models like Opus 4.7 in specific creative tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47796844&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been running this on my laptop with the Unsloth 20.9GB GGUF in LM Studio: https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-GGUF/blob/mai... It drew a better pelican riding a bicycle than Opus 4.7 did! https://simonwillison.net/2026/Apr/16/qwen-beats-opus/&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While there is relief that the Qwen team continues to publish open weights despite recent internal departures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793082&quot; title=&quot;A relief to see the Qwen team still publishing open weights, after the kneecapping [1] and departures of Junyang Lin and others [2]! [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47246746 [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47249343&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, some users expressed disappointment that the highly requested 27B variant was bypassed in favor of this 35B model &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793259&quot; title=&quot;I recall a Qwen exec posted a public poll on Twitter, asking which model from Qwen3.6 you want to see open-sourced; and the 27b variant was by far the most popular choice. Not sure why they ignored it lol.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical discussions focus on hardware requirements, noting that while 16GB GPUs may struggle with quality loss &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793691&quot; title=&quot;How much VRAM does it need? I haven&amp;#39;t run a local model yet, but I did recently pick up a 16GB GPU, before they were discontinued.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793774&quot; title=&quot;If you have to ask then your GPU is too small. With 16 GB you&amp;#39;ll be only able to run a very compressed variant with noticable quality loss.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, quantized versions from providers like Unsloth allow the model to run on consumer laptops &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793254&quot; title=&quot;Already quantized/converted into a sane format by Unsloth: https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-GGUF&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47796844&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been running this on my laptop with the Unsloth 20.9GB GGUF in LM Studio: https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-GGUF/blob/mai... It drew a better pelican riding a bicycle than Opus 4.7 did! https://simonwillison.net/2026/Apr/16/qwen-beats-opus/&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. However, community members caution that launch-day quantizations often require later revisions to fix performance bugs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47794787&quot; title=&quot;Unsloth is great for uploading quants quickly to experiment with, but everyone should know that they almost always revise their quants after testing. If you download the release day quants with a tool that doesn’t automatically check HF for new versions you should check back again in a week to look for updated versions. Some times the launch day quantizations have major problems which leads to early adopters dismissing useful models. You have to wait for everyone to test and fix bugs before…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openai.com/index/codex-for-almost-everything/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Codex for almost everything&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (openai.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47796469&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;998 points · 554 comments · by mikeevans&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI has released a major update to Codex, enabling the AI to operate computers alongside users, browse the web, generate images, and automate long-term developer workflows through new memory features and over 90 third-party plugins. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openai.com/index/codex-for-almost-everything/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Codex for (almost) everything    URL Source: https://openai.com/index/codex-for-almost-everything/    Markdown Content:  We’re releasing a major update to Codex, making it a more powerful partner for the more than 3 million developers who use it every week to accelerate work across the full software development lifecycle.    Codex can now operate your computer alongside you, work with more of the tools and apps you use everyday, generate images, remember your preferences, learn from previous…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of &amp;#34;professional agents&amp;#34; like Codex and Claude Cowork is viewed by some as a potentially massive product category that could disrupt traditional software by allowing agents to interface with apps on behalf of non-technical users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47796658&quot; title=&quot;My current expectation is that the Cowork/Codex set of &amp;#39;professional agents&amp;#39; for non-technical users will be one of the most important and fastest growing product categories of all time, so far. i.e. agents for knowledge workers who are not software engineers A few thoughts and questions: 1. I expect that this set of products will be extremely disruptive to many software businesses. It&amp;#39;s like when a new VP joins a company, they often rip and replace some of the software vendors with their…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue that these tools are merely catching up to existing features in Claude &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47798721&quot; title=&quot;Just reading the comments here it&amp;#39;s amazing how many people seemingly don&amp;#39;t know that Claude Desktop and Cowork basically already does all of this. Codex isn&amp;#39;t pioneering these features, it&amp;#39;s mostly just catching up.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt; and that non-technical users may find the unpredictable nature of AI-generated interfaces and &amp;#34;vague request&amp;#34; processing frustrating rather than helpful &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47796817&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; My current expectation is that the Cowork/Codex set of &amp;#39;professional agents&amp;#39; for non-technical users will be one of the most important and fastest growing product categories of all time, so far. They won&amp;#39;t. Non-technical users expect a CEO&amp;#39;s secretary from TV/movies: you do a vague request, the secretary does everything for you. LLMs cannot give you that by their own nature. &amp;gt; And eventually will the UI/interface be generated/personalized for the user, by the model? No. Please for the love of…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find value in replacing CLI tasks with AI commands &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47798076&quot; title=&quot;Lots of scepticism here, but I think this may really take off. After 25 years of heavy CLI use, lately I&amp;#39;ve found myself using codex (in terminal) for terminal tasks I&amp;#39;ve previously done using CLI commands. If someone manages to make a robust GUI version of this for normies, people will lap it up. People don&amp;#39;t want to juggle applications, we want computers to do what we want/need them to do.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others express significant security concerns regarding giving models direct control over their computers and applications &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47796627&quot; title=&quot;Do people really want codex to have control over their computer and apps? I&amp;#39;m still paranoid about keeping things securely sandboxed.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a cynical view that the current hype is driven by OpenAI&amp;#39;s strategic use of subsidized compute to win a PR war against Anthropic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47798887&quot; title=&quot;Codex is HN&amp;#39;s darling now because Anthropic lowered rate limits for individuals due to compute constraints. OAI has so few enterprise users they can afford to subsidize compute for this group a lot more than Anthropic. Eventually once they have more users they&amp;#39;ll do the same thing as Anthropic, of course. It&amp;#39;s all a transparent PR play and it&amp;#39;s kind of absurd to see the X/HN crowd fall for it hook, line, and sinker.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47798931&quot; title=&quot;Competition is bad? Who cares - let the big players subsidize and compete between each other. That&amp;#39;s what we want. We want strong models at a low price, and we&amp;#39;ll hype up whoever is doing it. Simultaneously, we also hype up the open models that are catching up. That are significantly more discounted, that also put pressure on the big players and keep them in check. People aren&amp;#39;t falling for PR; people are encouraging the PR to put pressure on the competition. It&amp;#39;s not that hard.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47796824&quot; title=&quot;I swear OpenAI has 2-3 unannounced releases ready to go at any time just so they can steal some thunder from their competitors when they announce something&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://aphyr.com/posts/420-the-future-of-everything-is-lies-i-guess-where-do-we-go-from-here&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The future of everything is lies, I guess: Where do we go from here?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (aphyr.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47792718&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;728 points · 762 comments · by aphyr&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kyle Kingsbury argues that society should resist the adoption of large language models to preserve human skill and critical thinking, warning that AI&amp;#39;s rapid integration threatens to cause profound cultural, economic, and psychological harm similar to the historical impact of the personal automobile. &lt;a href=&quot;https://aphyr.com/posts/420-the-future-of-everything-is-lies-i-guess-where-do-we-go-from-here&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Future of Everything is Lies, I Guess: Where Do We Go From Here?    URL Source: https://aphyr.com/posts/420-the-future-of-everything-is-lies-i-guess-where-do-we-go-from-here    Markdown Content:  # The Future of Everything is Lies, I Guess: Where Do We Go From Here?    *   [Aphyr](https://aphyr.com/)  *   [About](https://aphyr.com/about)  *   [Blog](https://aphyr.com/posts)  *   [Photos](https://aphyr.com/photos)  *   [Code](http://github.com/aphyr)    # [The Future of Everything is Lies, I…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters debate whether AI&amp;#39;s societal impact will mirror the automobile, which some argue provided utility while causing deep cultural isolation and environmental harm &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793214&quot; title=&quot;This is a must-read series of articles, and I think Kyle is very much correct. The comparison to the adoption of automobiles is apt, and something I&amp;#39;ve thought about before as well. Just because a technology can be useful doesn&amp;#39;t mean it will have positive effects on society. That said, I&amp;#39;m more open to using LLMs in constrained  scenarios, in cases where they&amp;#39;re an appropriate tool for the job and the downsides can be reasonably mitigated. The equivalent position in 1920 would not be telling…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793564&quot; title=&quot;Their negative effects are much more vast, subtle, and cultural. You could say many of the broad and widespread mental issues we have in the US is the result of automobiles leading to suburbanization and thus isolation of people. It has created an expensive barrier of entry for existing in society and added a ton of friction to doing anything and everything, especially with people. That&amp;#39;s not even getting into the climate effects. The upsides of automobiles generally all exist outside of the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47794837&quot; title=&quot;Respectfully, without judgement, your perspective may be wildly skewed because you’re American (going by your post history). I suspect the negative externalities in a society built around cars don’t register with you because to you it is the normal state of the world. As a Dutchman, I grew up in a built world that is based around the human scale and to me your parent’s claim comes across as astonishingly obvious.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some fear AI will devalue human intellect and empower a small elite to control society &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793754&quot; title=&quot;I fear that outside of cataclysmic global warfare or some sort of butlerian jihad (which amounts to the same) this genie is not going back into the bottle. This tech is 100% aligned with the goals of the 0.001% that own and control it, and almost all of the negatives cited by Kyle and likeminded (such as myself) are in fact positives for them in context of massive population reduction to eliminate &amp;#39;useless eaters&amp;#39; and technological societal control over the &amp;#39;NPCs&amp;#39; of the world that remain since…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47799472&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;I could retrain, but my core skills—reading, thinking, and writing—are squarely in the blast radius of large language models.&amp;#39; Yes. For the lifetime of almost everyone alive now, reading, thinking, and writing have been valued skills which moved one up in society&amp;#39;s hierarchy. This is a historical anomaly.  Prior to 1800 or so, those skills were not all that useful to the average farmer. There were more smart people than jobs for them. Gradually, more jobs for smart people were developed, but…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend the technology is currently too unreliable to replace human decision-making and is being overhyped to justify corporate layoffs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47794558&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; to eliminate &amp;#39;useless eaters&amp;#39; It can&amp;#39;t. It can&amp;#39;t even deal with emails without randomly deleting your email folder [1]. Saying that it can make decisions and replace humans is akin of saying that random number generator can make decisions and can replace people. It&amp;#39;s just an automation tool, and just like all automation tools before it it will create more jobs than destroy. All the CEOs&amp;#39; talks about labor replacement are a fuss, a pile of lies to justify layoffs and worsening financial…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, there is a sense of unease regarding the shift in human values, as skills like writing and thinking may lose their status as primary drivers of upward mobility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47799472&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;I could retrain, but my core skills—reading, thinking, and writing—are squarely in the blast radius of large language models.&amp;#39; Yes. For the lifetime of almost everyone alive now, reading, thinking, and writing have been valued skills which moved one up in society&amp;#39;s hierarchy. This is a historical anomaly.  Prior to 1800 or so, those skills were not all that useful to the average farmer. There were more smart people than jobs for them. Gradually, more jobs for smart people were developed, but…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47792900&quot; title=&quot;I agree with the general sentiment that the structure of society is going to change, but I don&amp;#39;t know what the satisfying solution is. It&amp;#39;s hard to imagine not participating will work, or even be financially viable for me, for long.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sleepingrobots.com/dreams/stop-using-ollama/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The local LLM ecosystem doesn’t need Ollama&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sleepingrobots.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47788385&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;640 points · 208 comments · by Zetaphor&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The article argues that users should abandon Ollama due to its history of downplaying its reliance on `llama.cpp`, performance issues caused by a buggy custom backend, misleading model naming, and a shift toward venture-backed cloud services that compromise the project&amp;#39;s original local-first, open-source mission. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sleepingrobots.com/dreams/stop-using-ollama/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Friends Don&amp;#39;t Let Friends Use Ollama    URL Source: https://sleepingrobots.com/dreams/stop-using-ollama/    Published Time: 2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  # Friends Don&amp;#39;t Let Friends Use Ollama | Sleeping Robots    [[SR]](https://sleepingrobots.com/)  *   [~/home](https://sleepingrobots.com/)  *   [~/dreams](https://sleepingrobots.com/dreams)  *   [~/about](https://sleepingrobots.com/about)  *   [~/map](https://sleepingrobots.com/map)    [←…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some argue that `llama.cpp` has evolved to offer a comparable one-command setup and built-in GUI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47789672&quot; title=&quot;Llama.cpp now has a gui installed by default. It previously lacked this. Times have changed.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47789755&quot; title=&quot;Having read above article, I just gave llama.cpp a shot. It is as easy as the author says now, though definitely not documented quite as well. My quickstart: brew install llama.cpp llama-server -hf ggml-org/gemma-4-E4B-it-GGUF --port 8000 Go to localhost:8000 for the Web UI. On Linux it accelerates correctly on my AMD GPU, which Ollama failed to do, though of course everyone&amp;#39;s mileage seems to vary on this.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47790061&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;solved the UX problem. &amp;gt;One command Notwithstanding the fact that there&amp;#39;s about zero difference between `ollama run model-name` and `llama-cpp -hf model-name`, and that running things in the terminal is already a gigantic UX blocker (Ollama&amp;#39;s popularity comes from the fact that it has a GUI), why are you putting the blame back on an open source project that owes you approximately zero communication ?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, many users maintain that Ollama remains superior for its seamless model management and &amp;#34;OpenAI compatible&amp;#34; API &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47789604&quot; title=&quot;Exactly. The blog post states that the alternatives listed are similarly intuitive. They are not. If you just need a chat app, then sure, there’s plenty of options. But if you want an OpenAI compatible API with model management, accessibility breaks down fast. I’m open to suggestions, but the alternatives outlined in the blog post ain’t it.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47789364&quot; title=&quot;I prefer Ollama over the suggested alternatives. I will switch once we have good user experience on simple features. A new model is released on HF or the Ollama registry? One `ollama pull` and it&amp;#39;s available. It&amp;#39;s underwhelming? `ollama rm`.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics of the transition note that `llama.cpp` can still be unfriendly to &amp;#34;normal users&amp;#34; and prone to versioning errors when loading new architectures like Gemma 4 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47789393&quot; title=&quot;No mention of the fact that Ollama is about 1000x easier to use. Llama.cpp is a great project, but it&amp;#39;s also one of the least user friendly pieces of software I&amp;#39;ve used. I don&amp;#39;t think anyone in the project cares about normal users. I started with Ollama, and it was great. But I moved to llama.cpp to have more up-to-date fixes. I still use Ollama to pull and list my models because it&amp;#39;s so easy. I then built my own set of scripts to populate a separate cache directory of hardlinks so llama-swap…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47790000&quot; title=&quot;Was hoping it was so easy :) But I probably need to look into it some more. llama_model_load: error loading model: error loading model architecture: unknown model architecture: &amp;#39;gemma4&amp;#39;  llama_model_load_from_file_impl: failed to load model Edit: @below, I used `nix-shell -p llama-cpp` so not brew related. Could indeed be an older version indeed! I&amp;#39;ll check.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47790325&quot; title=&quot;I just hit that error a few minutes ago. I build my llama.cpp from source because I use CUDA on Linux. So I made the mistake of trying to run Gemma4 on an older version I had and I got the same error. It’s possible brew installs an older version which doens’t support Gemma4 yet.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, the consensus suggests both tools serve different needs, with Ollama excelling at UX and Apple Silicon performance while `llama.cpp` offers more granular control and up-to-date fixes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47789393&quot; title=&quot;No mention of the fact that Ollama is about 1000x easier to use. Llama.cpp is a great project, but it&amp;#39;s also one of the least user friendly pieces of software I&amp;#39;ve used. I don&amp;#39;t think anyone in the project cares about normal users. I started with Ollama, and it was great. But I moved to llama.cpp to have more up-to-date fixes. I still use Ollama to pull and list my models because it&amp;#39;s so easy. I then built my own set of scripts to populate a separate cache directory of hardlinks so llama-swap…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47790220&quot; title=&quot;This is a bit like saying stop using Ubuntu, use Debian instead. Both llama.cpp and ollama are great and focused on different things and yet complement each other (both can be true at the same time!) Ollama has great ux and also supports inference via mlx, which has better performance on apple silicon than llama.cpp I&amp;#39;m using llama.cpp, ollama, lm studio, mlx etc etc depending on what is most convenient for me at the time to get done what I want to get done (e.g. a specific model config to run,…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://darkbloom.dev&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Darkbloom – Private inference on idle Macs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (darkbloom.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47788542&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;500 points · 250 comments · by twapi&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Darkbloom is a decentralized AI network that utilizes idle Apple Silicon machines to provide private, OpenAI-compatible inference at costs up to 70% lower than centralized providers. The platform uses hardware-level encryption and hardened runtimes to ensure operators cannot access user data while retaining 95% of revenue. &lt;a href=&quot;https://darkbloom.dev&quot; title=&quot;Title: Darkbloom — Private AI Inference on Apple Silicon    URL Source: https://darkbloom.dev/    Published Time: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:58:34 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Darkbloom — Private AI Inference on Apple Silicon | Eigen Labs    [Darkbloom](https://darkbloom.dev/)[Motivation](https://darkbloom.dev/#thesis)[Approach](https://darkbloom.dev/#security)[Implementation](https://darkbloom.dev/#api)[Results](https://darkbloom.dev/#pricing)[Operator Economics](https://darkbloom.dev/#nodes)    Research Preview…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are skeptical of Darkbloom&amp;#39;s projected earnings, noting that current demand is insufficient to justify claims of making $1,000–$2,000 monthly &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47788769&quot; title=&quot;I have a hard time believing their numbers. If you can pay off a mac mini in 2-4 months, and make $1-2k profit every month after that, why wouldn’t their business model just be buying mac minis?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47789171&quot; title=&quot;I installed this so you don&amp;#39;t have to. It did feel a bit quirky and not super polished. Fails to download the image model. The audio/tts model fails to load. In 15 minutes of serving Gemma, I got precisely zero actual inference requests, and a bunch of health checks and two attestations. At the moment they don&amp;#39;t have enough sustained demand to justify the earning estimates.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While the developers admit these figures assume 100% utilization, independent calculations suggest a more modest revenue of roughly $67 per month for a fully utilized high-end Mac &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47788813&quot; title=&quot;Cool idea. Just some back-of-the-envelope math here (not trusting what&amp;#39;s on their site): My M5 Pro can generate 130 tok/s (4 streams) on Gemma 4 26B. Darkbloom&amp;#39;s pricing is $0.20 per Mtok output. That&amp;#39;s about $2.24/day or $67/mo revenue if it&amp;#39;s fully utilized 24/7. Now assuming 50W sustained load, that&amp;#39;s about 36 kWh/mo, at ~$.25/kWh approx. $9/mo in costs. Could be good for lunch money every once in a while! Around $700/yr.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47791238&quot; title=&quot;The numbers are optimistically legit -- it&amp;#39;s calculated based purely considering we have demand for all machines at all times. We don&amp;#39;t have that right now, but fairly optimistic that people will do it. That&amp;#39;s why we don&amp;#39;t recommend purchasing a new machine. Existing machine is no cost for you to run this. Electricity is one cost, but it will get paid off from every request it receives. Electricity is only deducted when you run an inference. If you have any questions, DM me @gajesh on Twitter.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical debates center on the security of the &amp;#34;private inference&amp;#34; model; critics argue Macs lack a true hardware TEE for the GPU, while the developers claim that macOS kernel-level protections like SIP and Hardened Runtime can effectively isolate memory &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47788762&quot; title=&quot;They use the TEE to check that the model and code is untampered with. That&amp;#39;s a good, valid approach and should work (I&amp;#39;ve done similar things on AWS with their TEE) The key question here is how they avoid the outside computer being able to view the memory of the internal process: &amp;gt; An in-process inference design that embeds the in-  ference engine directly in a hardened process, elimi-  nating all inter-process communication channels that  could be observed, with optional hypervisor mem-  ory…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47788827&quot; title=&quot;Macs do not have an accessible hardware TEE. Macs have secure enclaves.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47789002&quot; title=&quot;Good point! But they argue that: &amp;gt; PT_DENY_ATTACH (ptrace constant 31): Invoked  at process startup before any sensitive data is loaded.  Instructs the macOS kernel to permanently deny all  ptracerequests against this process, including from  root. This blocks lldb, dtrace, and Instruments. &amp;gt; Hardened Runtime: The binary is code-signed with  hardened runtime options and explicitly without the  com.apple.security.get-task-allow  entitlement. The kernel denies task_for_pid()  and mach_vm_read()from any…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, some users warn that the requirement to install MDM software grants the company significant control over the host machine, making it unsuitable for primary personal devices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47790114&quot; title=&quot;You have to install their MDM device management software on your computer. Basically that computer is theirs now. So don&amp;#39;t plan on just handing over your laptop temporarily unless you don&amp;#39;t mind some company completely owning your box. Still might be a validate use for people with slightly old laptops lying around, but beware trying to share this computer with your daily activities if you e.g. use a bank on a browser on this computer regularly. MDM means they can swap out your SSL certs level…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thunderbolt.io/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mozilla Thunderbolt&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (thunderbolt.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47792368&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;367 points · 338 comments · by dabinat&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mozilla has launched Thunderbolt, an open-source and cross-platform AI client designed for enterprises to maintain data sovereignty through self-hosting and customizable, model-agnostic infrastructure. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thunderbolt.io/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Thunderbolt — AI You Control    URL Source: https://www.thunderbolt.io/    Published Time: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 20:42:07 UTC    Markdown Content:  The Open-Source, Cross-Platform, Extensible AI Client    ![Image 1](https://www.thunderbolt.io/enterprise/control-data.png)    ### Control Your Data    Self-host on your infrastructure or let us help you deploy. Your data never leaves your control.    ### Built for Enterprise    Native apps across web, desktop, and mobile. MCP integration with your systems.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The launch of Mozilla Thunderbolt has reignited a debate over Mozilla’s core mission, with many users urging the organization to stop &amp;#34;distracting&amp;#34; projects and focus exclusively on browser performance and web standards &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47794578&quot; title=&quot;For anyone reading this that has worked on the launch of this new product (or the many others of their ilk throughout the years) under the various Mozilla orgs, I mean no disrespect, however I feel it&amp;#39;s important to not mince words these days.. I implore ANYONE at Mozilla org to please, please stop working on projects distracting from the complex and necessary work of browser and web standards stewardship. That alone should be the very reason for your continued existence if you have any. Focus…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47792603&quot; title=&quot;oh mozilla, why don&amp;#39;t you just focus on Firefox. That is all we want.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793266&quot; title=&quot;Chrome on Linux is ~1.47 times faster than Firefox on the Jetstream 3 benchmark as recently reported by Phoronix[0]. That&amp;#39;s how we want you to spend the money Mozilla, keeping up with your well-funded rival Google, and making it so we don&amp;#39;t end up with a browser monoculture. These sorts of distractions just piss me off, and are not part of your core mission. [0]: https://www.phoronix.com/review/firefox-chrome-2026&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics point to a significant performance gap between Firefox and Chrome &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793266&quot; title=&quot;Chrome on Linux is ~1.47 times faster than Firefox on the Jetstream 3 benchmark as recently reported by Phoronix[0]. That&amp;#39;s how we want you to spend the money Mozilla, keeping up with your well-funded rival Google, and making it so we don&amp;#39;t end up with a browser monoculture. These sorts of distractions just piss me off, and are not part of your core mission. [0]: https://www.phoronix.com/review/firefox-chrome-2026&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt; and the omission of features like Web USB &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47795407&quot; title=&quot;Web usb and serial are not just missing, last I checked Mozilla is opting to not implement based on their moral stance. It just puts them behind for some stuff.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, while defenders argue that Firefox remains a superior daily driver for privacy and ad-blocking &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47794972&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; already painful and readily apparent, stagnation of your browser What&amp;#39;s wrong with Firefox? There are several things Firefox does that it&amp;#39;s annoying to live without in other browsers (video pop-outs, competent ad blocking, etc). Is there some core feature that&amp;#39;s missing? I&amp;#39;m subjected to Edge at work and I couldn&amp;#39;t tell you a single thing it does that I&amp;#39;d want FF to do. &amp;gt; and our standards bodies as entities distinct from corporations Ok, I buy that.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47795426&quot; title=&quot;Firefox is pretty cool. Use it every day. Blocks ads  Multi account containers  Dev tools very good I never notice that it is in any way slow, except for those sites that need infinity cpu on any browser, like jira. What specifically is the issue? To my mind it quietly just gets on with things.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some clarify that this project stems from the independent, revenue-positive Thunderbird team and serves as a necessary attempt to diversify income streams away from Google &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793523&quot; title=&quot;Addressing the usual few complaints folks always bring up: * This is from the separate independent team that works on Thunderbird, not Firefox, so there isn&amp;#39;t any resource contention happening there * Thunderbird is revenue positive, and this potentially gives that team another revenue stream to be even more self-sustaining through charging companies * Businesses definitely want to control the AI they&amp;#39;re using (especially with RAGs of their own data) instead of just throwing it at their LLM…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47796039&quot; title=&quot;These two goals: &amp;gt; ... please stop working on projects distracting from the complex and necessary work of browser and web standards stewardship. &amp;gt; Ditching any direct financial ties to Google or any other browser vendor is both important and necessary... are inherently contradictory. If you do not want Mozilla to have revenue from search vendors that also have browsers, it has to come from somewhere else. Or are you suggesting they switch the default search engine back to Yahoo [0]? I am not…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/unexpected-54k-billing-spike-in-13-hours-firebase-browser-key-without-api-restrictions-used-for-gemini-requests/140262&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;€54k spike in 13h from unrestricted Firebase browser key accessing Gemini APIs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (discuss.ai.google.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47791871&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;398 points · 288 comments · by zanbezi&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer incurred over €54,000 in Gemini API charges within 13 hours after an unrestricted Firebase browser key was exploited by automated traffic, leading Google to emphasize the importance of spend caps and server-side key management. &lt;a href=&quot;https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/unexpected-54k-billing-spike-in-13-hours-firebase-browser-key-without-api-restrictions-used-for-gemini-requests/140262&quot; title=&quot;Title: Unexpected €54k billing spike in 13 hours: Firebase browser key without API restrictions used for Gemini requests - Gemini API - Google AI Developers Forum    URL Source: https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/unexpected-54k-billing-spike-in-13-hours-firebase-browser-key-without-api-restrictions-used-for-gemini-requests/140262    Published Time: 2026-04-15T12:35:44+00:00    Markdown Content:  ## post by zanbezi 1 day ago    [![Image 1:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a consensus that cloud providers&amp;#39; lack of hard spending caps is a major liability, as budget alerts often trigger hours after costs have already spiraled into life-altering sums &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47792484&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; We had a budget alert (€80) and a cost anomaly alert, both of which triggered with a delay of a few hours &amp;gt; By the time we reacted, costs were already around €28,000 &amp;gt; The final amount settled at €54,000+ due to delayed cost reporting So much for the folks defending these three companies that refused to provide hard spending cap (&amp;#39;but you can set the budget&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;you are doing it wrong if you worry about billing&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;hard cap it&amp;#39;s technically impossible&amp;#39; etc.)&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47792214&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; We had a budget alert (€80) and a cost anomaly alert, both of which triggered with a delay of a few hours. By the time we reacted, costs were already around €28,000. I had a similar experience with GCP where I set a budget of $100 and was only emailed 5 hours after exceeding the budget by which time I was well over it. It&amp;#39;s mind boggling that features like this aren&amp;#39;t prioritized. Sure it would probably make Google less money short term, but surely that&amp;#39;s more preferable to providing devs…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47792896&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s actually crazy. So I can build a project I love, that does good, but somehow get in a situation where I&amp;#39;m accidentally paying 30.000€ (or 50.000€) to a big tech company? How is that fair? I mean yes, as a software engineer, you ought to reflect on all possible weaknesses, but there was a time when overlooking something meant something completely different than being down 30/50k. That is actually life-altering.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that real-time billing synchronization is technically difficult &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47792823&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d buy the technically impossible angle. Even if you manage to get your microservices to synch every penny spent to your payment account at realtime (impossible) you still have to waiver the excess, losing some money every time someone goes past their quota.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the current system is predatory and should be replaced by prepaid models or legal protections against unauthorized overages &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47792881&quot; title=&quot;This should be illegal. If a contractor your hired to swap out a tile on your bathroom floor billed you for remodelling your back garden, you would obviously have the legal right to refuse that.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47792042&quot; title=&quot;Prepaid only is a fantastic idea, especially for dumb-ass startups. Limiting your liability to $100 or so sound like a big-ass W.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. A specific point of contention is the security of API keys; while historically treated loosely in some Google contexts, their use for expensive LLM inference now requires a level of secrecy that many developers have failed to implement &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47792066&quot; title=&quot;Considering the amount of repositories on public GitHub with hard-coded Gemini API tokens inside the shared source code ( https://github.com/search?q=gemini+%22AIza%22&amp;amp;type=code ), this hardly comes as a surprise. Google also has historically treated API keys as non-secrets, except with the introduction of the keys for LLM inference, then users are supposed to treat those secretly, but I&amp;#39;m not sure everyone got that memo yet. Considering that the author didn&amp;#39;t share what website this is about,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47792160&quot; title=&quot;Um. What? In what world are API keys not secrets?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.joanwestenberg.com/the-passive-income-trap-ate-a-generation-of-entrepreneurs/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The &amp;quot;Passive Income&amp;quot; trap ate a generation of entrepreneurs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (joanwestenberg.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47799120&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;399 points · 281 comments · by devonnull&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#34;passive income&amp;#34; movement has misled a generation of entrepreneurs into prioritizing automated extraction over genuine value, resulting in a flood of low-quality dropshipping stores and affiliate spam that ultimately fails both the creators and their customers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.joanwestenberg.com/the-passive-income-trap-ate-a-generation-of-entrepreneurs/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The &amp;#39;Passive Income&amp;#39; trap ate a generation of entrepreneurs    URL Source: https://www.joanwestenberg.com/the-passive-income-trap-ate-a-generation-of-entrepreneurs/    Published Time: 2026-04-03T06:25:28.000Z    Markdown Content:  # The &amp;#39;Passive Income&amp;#39; trap ate a generation of entrepreneurs    [&amp;gt; Westenberg.](https://www.joanwestenberg.com/)[MENU][1. About](https://www.joanwestenberg.com/about/)[2. Self](https://www.thisisstudioself.com/)[3. RSS](https://www.joanwestenberg.com/rss/)[4.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that the &amp;#34;passive income&amp;#34; trend is a misdiagnosis of a timeless desire for easy wealth, noting that the true barrier to modern entrepreneurship is the difficulty of competing with massive, consolidated corporations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47800349&quot; title=&quot;This article really felt like a misdiagnosis to me. Sure, a lot of these people were just buying hype from these &amp;#39;get rich from drop shipping!&amp;#39; influencers, just like a million other suckers who got dollar signs in their eyes with real estate schemes, pyramid sale schemes, yada yada, a tale as old as time. I don&amp;#39;t think this &amp;#39;passive income&amp;#39; trap is really anything new, and I don&amp;#39;t think it was some unique thing that &amp;#39;ate a generation of entrepreneurs&amp;#39;, as if that trap didn&amp;#39;t exist then instead…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47799787&quot; title=&quot;Isn&amp;#39;t passive  income a cornerstone of of the Rich  Dad Poor Dad Books? This long predates 2020. I would say selling masks and only being $800 in the hole is a lot better than starting a &amp;#39;regular business&amp;#39; and down  $80k-800k.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some dismiss the concept as a &amp;#34;trap&amp;#34; for those who underestimate the ongoing work required to maintain revenue streams &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47800068&quot; title=&quot;I appreciated when &amp;#39;passive income&amp;#39; was the flavor of the week because it was a good signpost for people you could ignore. In particular anybody who didn&amp;#39;t understand that you could assign a present value to future income, or that infinite series can sum to finite values. Seriously, the prototypical example of being an author is not particularly passive income lol! A book being print-on-demand indefinitely != infinite income. 99% of copies will almost certainly be sold within a few years, not…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47800180&quot; title=&quot;The way it shakes out is that there&amp;#39;s no widely accessible way of escaping actual, ongoing work, which is what unmotivated people actually hear behind the words &amp;#39;passive income.&amp;#39; Whatever the industry/vertical/field, a tiny number will hit it so big that they can actually stop working. Everyone else can bolster their income with passive sources, but that passive income ultimately depends on continuing new stimulus into the market (new products/services, more work marketing) to keep the…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that successful solo businesses exist but remain invisible due to sampling bias and a lack of desire for competition &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47801287&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; You rarely see anything more than a couple hundred bucks a month. There are notable exceptions, but unfortunately a lot of those notable exceptions are scammy, spammy business models. I suspect this is largely sampling bias. I host meetups for indie founders, and several attendees earn their living through solo businesses. When I go to conferences like Microconf, I meet lots more. The problem with measuring financial success by who posts about it on HN is: * The more someone is making at…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, the discussion highlights a divide between those seeking total leisure and those using side gigs for modest financial flexibility or the freedom to pursue non-commercial projects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47799915&quot; title=&quot;my favourite bit was 8&amp;lt;------------ Free to do what? Sit on a beach, apparently. Every single one of these people wanted to sit on a beach. I&amp;#39;ve never understood this. Have they been to a beach? There&amp;#39;s sand. It gets everywhere. You can sit there for maybe three hours before you want to do literally anything else. 8&amp;lt;------------ I laughed out loud when I read it, because it&amp;#39;s so true.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47800861&quot; title=&quot;We started a trophy and award business because my spouse was already making shirts and stuff so we had most of the equipment. The overhead is really low thanks to quick shipping from a large employee owned national supplier (seriously, JDS industries is fucking awesome). It&amp;#39;s enough to pay for itself easily and pay for a vacation or two a year, for about 4 hours of work a week. If we really put effort in, it could replace our day jobs. Where most people go wrong is their expectation. We…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47799738&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Free to do what? Sit on a beach, apparently. Quite the opposite for me. I&amp;#39;d like to have freedom to work on things I want to work on without &amp;#39;paying rent&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;paying medical bills&amp;#39;, or &amp;#39;short term profitability&amp;#39; being a constraint.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.cloudflare.com/email-for-agents/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cloudflare Email Service&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.cloudflare.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47792593&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;460 points · 204 comments · by jilles&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudflare has launched its Email Service into public beta, providing developers with a complete toolkit to build email-native AI agents that can autonomously receive, process, and send bidirectional emails directly through the Cloudflare Workers platform and Agents SDK. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.cloudflare.com/email-for-agents/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Email for agents - Cloudflare Email Service now in public beta    URL Source: https://blog.cloudflare.com/email-for-agents/    Published Time: 2026-04-16T14:00+08:00    Markdown Content:  2026-04-16    6 min read    ![Image 1](https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/1Qf637mptxRY4oxcvZhPi2/310c6583742e2b812a77e09c27340f70/BLOG-3210_1.png)    Email is the most accessible interface in the world. It is ubiquitous. There’s no need for a custom chat application, no custom SDK for each channel.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudflare’s expansion into email sending is viewed as a natural step in its evolution toward becoming a full AWS competitor, though users noted the pricing is surprisingly higher than AWS SES &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47794330&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not sure why this announcement has generated so much irritation in the comments-- Cloudflare has been transitioning from &amp;#39;DDoS protection&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;AWS competitor&amp;#39; for many years now, and this is just their alternative to AWS SES. It&amp;#39;s an email sender that you can access through an API, or directly through Workers. For those who haven&amp;#39;t been keeping up over the years, Workers is their product for running code on Cloudflare&amp;#39;s platform directly (an AWS Lambda competitor, more or less) and they&amp;#39;ve…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793793&quot; title=&quot;$0.35 per 1,000 emails it&amp;#39;s fair pricing. Looks better than fixed $20 for Resend.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. A central debate exists regarding deliverability: while some argue that maintaining a clean reputation is straightforward for non-spammers, industry veterans contend that large-scale abuse mitigation is a complex &amp;#34;cat-and-mouse game&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47794926&quot; title=&quot;Ok, but what about as a CDN/website-proxy/WAF? I know we don&amp;#39;t have the same automated reputation-propagation as with email, but same thing supposedly happens there, where eventually you get turned off if you don&amp;#39;t act on lawful requests, which is exactly why Cloudflare is unavailable in Spain during La Liga matches, because Cloudflare don&amp;#39;t take piracy streams down. In theory, Cloudflare should take those down, when requested by legal means, but that doesn&amp;#39;t matter. How sure are we that…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47796086&quot; title=&quot;I run an email sending service at scale (billions of messages per month, tens of millions of end users, thousands of customers). Most of our software development and operational effort revolves around abuse mitigation. That has been the case for 15 years. It&amp;#39;s a cat-and-mouse game with two different mice: the senders, who are constantly trying to figure out how to get you to deliver their garbage; and the receivers, who are constantly trying to figure out how to block it. We&amp;#39;re stuck in the…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Skepticism remains high due to Cloudflare’s reputation for leniency toward controversial content, leading to fears that poor spam policing could compromise the service&amp;#39;s IP reputation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47794530&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; But getting back to the consensus in the comments here: I&amp;#39;m not sure why people think that they&amp;#39;ll be worse about policing spam than AWS SES, Azure Email, etc. Cloudflare is (in)famous for not acting against spammers, fraud, piracy and other less savory groups that are hosting their stuff at/behind Cloudflare, so reasonably, people who&amp;#39;ve been affected by that are now afraid the same thing will happen with email.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47794926&quot; title=&quot;Ok, but what about as a CDN/website-proxy/WAF? I know we don&amp;#39;t have the same automated reputation-propagation as with email, but same thing supposedly happens there, where eventually you get turned off if you don&amp;#39;t act on lawful requests, which is exactly why Cloudflare is unavailable in Spain during La Liga matches, because Cloudflare don&amp;#39;t take piracy streams down. In theory, Cloudflare should take those down, when requested by legal means, but that doesn&amp;#39;t matter. How sure are we that…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47794993&quot; title=&quot;Blog author chiming in here: We have reserved IPs for Email Service and will be protecting the reputation and fighting spam from originating on Email Service. If we did not do so, our IPs would get flagged and then emails end up in spam or not delivered. That defeats the purpose of having a transactional Email Service. We&amp;#39;re well aware of this.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, some critics dismissed the announcement&amp;#39;s heavy focus on &amp;#34;AI agents&amp;#34; as &amp;#34;vibe-coded&amp;#34; marketing for a standard transactional email tool &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47794783&quot; title=&quot;Cloudflare is spending years of goodwill earned through technical skill, trending towards AI enshittification starting with their blog posts and vibe coded features/products.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47794902&quot; title=&quot;I also kind of rolled my eyes at the blog post and its obsessive focus on &amp;#39;agents&amp;#39; -- definitely feels like a solution looking for a problem. But the email-sending product being promoted is probably ok, right? They just happened to write a lot of words observing that ChatGPT can, in fact, call sendmail() through their platform (if you give it access) -- a fact that shouldn&amp;#39;t surprise anyone.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kotaku.com/video-game-devs-explain-how-pausing-works-and-sometimes-it-gets-weird-2000686339&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Game devs explain the tricks involved with letting you pause a game&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (kotaku.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793161&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;422 points · 231 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Game developers use various creative techniques to pause gameplay, ranging from slowing time to near-zero speeds and utilizing screenshots as static backgrounds to managing complex hierarchies of &amp;#34;pause levels&amp;#34; for different system requirements. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kotaku.com/video-game-devs-explain-how-pausing-works-and-sometimes-it-gets-weird-2000686339&quot; title=&quot;Title: Video Game Devs Explain How Pausing Works And Sometimes It Gets Weird    URL Source: https://kotaku.com/video-game-devs-explain-how-pausing-works-and-sometimes-it-gets-weird-2000686339    Published Time: 2026-04-09T19:53:07+00:00    Markdown Content:  Pausing a game is so common that I doubt many of us ever really think about it. Maybe a pause menu has a cool song, or maybe you’re playing an always-online game that features a pause menu that doesn’t actually pause anything. In those cases, you…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights how early games like *Quake* and *Warcraft* used architectural constraints to create elegant features, such as recording gameplay by capturing network packets or using palette swaps to signal pauses during network stalls &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822869&quot; title=&quot;It wasn&amp;#39;t really that much to do with determinism. Quake uses a client-server network model all the time, even when you&amp;#39;re only playing a local single-player game. What the demo recording system does is capture all of the network packets that are being sent from the server to the client. When playing back a demo, all the game has to do is run a client and replay the packets that it originally received from the server. It&amp;#39;s a very elegant system that naturally flows out of the rather…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824861&quot; title=&quot;One of the fun features that I developed for Warcraft (the RTS) was to fade the screen to grayscale when the game is paused. Since the game uses a 256 color palette, it was only necessary to update a few bytes of data (3x256) instead of redrawing the whole screen, so the effect was quick. I also used this trick when the game stalled due to missing network packets from other players. Initially the game would still be responsive when no messages were received so that you could still interact and…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some developers advocate for maintaining engine determinism for its utility in replays and debugging, others note that modern complexities like multithreading, variable frame rates, and cross-platform physics make it difficult to implement &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822513&quot; title=&quot;Checking in as a random indie developer who still prioritises determinism in my engine. I don&amp;#39;t understand why so many games/engines sacrifice it when it has so much utility.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822638&quot; title=&quot;I think if it were as simple as &amp;#39;remember the RNG seed&amp;#39;, game developers would do it every time. But determinism also means, for instance, running the physics engine at a deterministic timestep regardless of the frame rate, to avoid differences in accumulated error or collision detection. And that&amp;#39;s something that needs designing in from day one . Thank you for still prioritizing it.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822558&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m pretty sure it&amp;#39;s because it&amp;#39;s in fact &amp;#39;just&amp;#39; a cool side effect to a common network architecture optimisation from the time where you could&amp;#39;nt send the &amp;#39;state&amp;#39; of the entire game even with only delta modifiers and so you make the game detertministic to only synchronize inputs :) an exemple article I remember : https://www.gamedeveloper.com/programming/1500-archers-on-a-... The main downside which probably caused the diseapearance is that any patch to the game will make the replay file…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a technical debate over whether *Quake&amp;#39;s* demo system relied on pure determinism or simply replayed server-to-client network traffic, with some noting that even minor hardware revisions or game patches can break input-based recordings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822869&quot; title=&quot;It wasn&amp;#39;t really that much to do with determinism. Quake uses a client-server network model all the time, even when you&amp;#39;re only playing a local single-player game. What the demo recording system does is capture all of the network packets that are being sent from the server to the client. When playing back a demo, all the game has to do is run a client and replay the packets that it originally received from the server. It&amp;#39;s a very elegant system that naturally flows out of the rather…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823055&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t see why it makes a difference for this purpose that you&amp;#39;re replaying network packets or controller inputs or any other interface to the game engine.  The important thing is that there is some well-defined interface. I guess designing for networked multiplayer does probably necessitate that, but if the engine isn&amp;#39;t deterministic it still isn&amp;#39;t going to work. There was a twitter thread years ago (which appears to be long gone) about how the SNES Pilot Wings pre-game demo was just a…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823126&quot; title=&quot;Look into dead reckoning vs lock step for networking. Lockstep requires determinism at the simulation layer, dead reckoning can be much more tolerant of differences and latency. Quake and most action games tend to be dead reckoning (with more modern ones including time rewind and some other neat tricks). Very common that replay/demo uses the network stack of it&amp;#39;s present in a game.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47822558&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m pretty sure it&amp;#39;s because it&amp;#39;s in fact &amp;#39;just&amp;#39; a cool side effect to a common network architecture optimisation from the time where you could&amp;#39;nt send the &amp;#39;state&amp;#39; of the entire game even with only delta modifiers and so you make the game detertministic to only synchronize inputs :) an exemple article I remember : https://www.gamedeveloper.com/programming/1500-archers-on-a-... The main downside which probably caused the diseapearance is that any patch to the game will make the replay file…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://daedal.io/@thomzane/116410863009847575&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;FSF trying to contact Google about spammer sending 10k+ mails from Gmail account&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (daedal.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47788424&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;395 points · 225 comments · by pabs3&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Free Software Foundation representative is seeking a direct contact at Google to report a spammer who sent over 10,000 emails through a Gmail account, citing a lack of response from standard abuse reporting forms. &lt;a href=&quot;https://daedal.io/@thomzane/116410863009847575&quot; title=&quot;Title: Thom Zane (@thomzane@daedal.io)    URL Source: https://daedal.io/@thomzane/116410863009847575    Markdown Content:  # Thom Zane: &amp;#39;Does anyone on the fediverse e…&amp;#39; - the daedal earth    #### Recent searches    No recent searches    #### Search options    Only available when logged in.    **daedal.io** is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.    [![Image 1](https://daedal.io/packs/assets/preview-vSUsFXid.png)](https://daedal.io/about)    the daedal…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a growing frustration with the lack of human customer support and accountability from major providers like Google and Microsoft, who are increasingly seen as the primary sources of modern spam &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47788921&quot; title=&quot;It honestly is a bit dissapointing that most of the internet&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;infrastructure&amp;#39; is tied up in large corporations that just get money for free by being the only provider and face little to no backlash (because of their monopoly) when they neglect things like basic customer service.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47790742&quot; title=&quot;I gave up on trying to report abuse to Google, Amazon or Microsoft. It seems reports simply get ignored and the big providers do nothing. I hope the FSF with its weight and media presence can finally do something. Google, Microsoft, and Amazon are my major sources of spam. These days, this is where spam comes from. At this point, they are also too big to block. We allowed this to happen, through neglect and laziness. Even in this discussion: how many people use Gmail as their primary email…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users note that Google has automated systems to suspend accounts based on abuse reports, others argue these systems are easily bypassed or ignored, often requiring extreme measures like filing police reports to get a human response &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47789272&quot; title=&quot;Google suspend email accounts that get lots of spam reports. It happens a couple of times a year for salespeople in my company who use Gmass (a bulk email sending tool). I mention it only as a useful data point, and in the absence of anyone else on the thread mentioning that Google have robust email abuse monitoring.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47791093&quot; title=&quot;I got a human being at Google to look into my problem and take action after sending a police report to Google‘s legal department certified mail return receipt along with a letter describing how someone was impersonating me and my business using a Gmail address in an attempt to commit fraud. Yes, it was a pain to take all of these steps and it probably took about 3 hours but it was absolutely necessary considering there was no avenue for me to shut down this person otherwise.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47790742&quot; title=&quot;I gave up on trying to report abuse to Google, Amazon or Microsoft. It seems reports simply get ignored and the big providers do nothing. I hope the FSF with its weight and media presence can finally do something. Google, Microsoft, and Amazon are my major sources of spam. These days, this is where spam comes from. At this point, they are also too big to block. We allowed this to happen, through neglect and laziness. Even in this discussion: how many people use Gmail as their primary email…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a sharp disagreement over whether bulk email services like Mailchimp are more effective at preventing spam than Gmail, or if they are simply another source of the problem &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47790179&quot; title=&quot;Was going to say there’s a good reason lots of people use services like mailchimp now. You’re not sensibly managing it yourself with the current (very sensible) regulations in the US / EU, nor do you want to be sending from your own domain en masse.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47790239&quot; title=&quot;Mailchimp and other legitimate services (other than salesforce, which is best just blocked) don&amp;#39;t permit spam, whereas gmail and outlook don&amp;#39;t give a fuck unless the spammer gets a large amount of abuse reports. Certainly mailchimp and the like make things simpler, but the price can be quite high.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47790526&quot; title=&quot;This seems to be a laughable claim? I don&amp;#39;t get anything but spam from Mailchimp.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/16/everything-we-like-is-a-psyop/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Everything we like is a psyop?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techcrunch.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47800738&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;343 points · 246 comments · by evo_9&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Marketing firms and startups are increasingly using &amp;#34;creator farms&amp;#34; and thousands of fake social media accounts to manufacture viral trends, blurring the line between traditional promotion and the artificial manipulation of public opinion. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/16/everything-we-like-is-a-psyop/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Everything we like is a psyop    URL Source: https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/16/everything-we-like-is-a-psyop/    Published Time: 2026-04-16T17:03:18+00:00    Markdown Content:  Last year, I was telegraphed a subliminal mandate from the indie rock powers that be: I was supposed to like Geese. The young Brooklynites make good music, but are they the saviors of rock and roll, the defining rock band of Gen Z, the second coming of The Strokes?    The buzz around the band [would suggest…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters express deep skepticism regarding the authenticity of online discourse, arguing that marketing firms and government agencies heavily manipulate narratives on platforms like Reddit and HN to influence consumer behavior and protect corporate valuations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47801148&quot; title=&quot;I think most users of websites like reddit, x, and yes even HN don&amp;#39;t realize how much traffic is inorganic. Marketing firms, government agencies, and many other interested parties with money to burn are absolutely aware that you search &amp;#39;best {product} reddit&amp;#39; I&amp;#39;ve commented on this before, but I strongly suspect much of the narrative around AI is being formed with strong inputs from these patterns. What&amp;#39;s your basis for thinking that codex is best for planning, but opus is best for…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47801479&quot; title=&quot;I like how that article claims PR firms don&amp;#39;t lie and then proceeds to discuss how their best PR campaign was effectively a lie. &amp;gt; We estimated, based on some fairly informal math, that there were about 5000 stores on the Web. We got one paper to print this number, which seemed neutral enough. But once this &amp;#39;fact&amp;#39; was out there in print, we could quote it to other publications, and claim that with 1000 users we had 20% of the online store market.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest countering this &amp;#34;inorganic&amp;#34; traffic by following trusted individual experts or obscure artists &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47801512&quot; title=&quot;This is not true though. My two favorite bands from the past year were poorly-attended shows that I stumbled into. You can still seek out good underground, obscure artists - you just have to look for them. Not trying to be elitist - like what you like. I just really feel like little artists need the support. Plus, it feels like there is a bit more satisfying agency and fate in looking for new things rather than being fed them.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47801249&quot; title=&quot;A good reason to find specific individuals with relevant knowledge and follow their writing directly. Think simonw and his pelicans... but there are lesser known trustworthy voices as well. It just takes some time to find them for a given area of interest. Also bring back blogrolls.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others warn that even independent voices are eventually co-opted by &amp;#34;shilling&amp;#34; once they gain influence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47801559&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; A good reason to find specific individuals with relevant knowledge and follow their writing directly. As soon as they get popular enough they&amp;#39;ll be approached with offers to shill in exchange for huge piles of money. That&amp;#39;s the entire point of &amp;#39;influencers&amp;#39;. Trusted people being turned into secret advertisers and billboards.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. This environment creates a sense of paranoia where even personal coincidences, such as remembering a book on its release date, are viewed as potential results of subconscious priming &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47801425&quot; title=&quot;I had a very odd experience the other day; while waiting for a doctor’s appointment, I had a book I’d read pop into my head (Mercy of Gods, very good) and looked up when the sequel was going to release. It had come out that morning. I can’t remember seeing any marketing about the sequel, I don’t use any app or service that would have told me it was upcoming or released, and I block ads; but it feels too enormous a coincidence for me to discount the idea that I had been primed to look it up.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://simonwillison.net/2026/Apr/16/qwen-beats-opus/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Qwen3.6-35B-A3B on my laptop drew me a better pelican than Claude Opus 4.7&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (simonwillison.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47796830&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;462 points · 97 comments · by simonw&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alibaba’s Qwen3.6-35B-A3B model outperformed Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.7 in generating SVG illustrations of pelicans and flamingos, demonstrating that local, quantized models can sometimes surpass larger proprietary ones in specific creative coding tasks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://simonwillison.net/2026/Apr/16/qwen-beats-opus/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B on my laptop drew me a better pelican than Claude Opus 4.7    URL Source: https://simonwillison.net/2026/Apr/16/qwen-beats-opus/    Published Time: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 05:10:51 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Qwen3.6-35B-A3B on my laptop drew me a better pelican than Claude Opus 4.7    # [Simon Willison’s Weblog](https://simonwillison.net/)    [Subscribe](https://simonwillison.net/about/#subscribe)    **Sponsored by:** Honeycomb — AI agents behave unpredictably. Get the context you need to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether &amp;#34;pelican on a bicycle&amp;#34; tests remain valid benchmarks, with some arguing they are prone to overfitting and that more complex &amp;#34;out of distribution&amp;#34; prompts like a flamingo on a unicycle are needed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47798174&quot; title=&quot;I understand the &amp;#39;fun factor&amp;#39; but at this point I really wonder what this pelican still proofs ? I mean, providers certainly could have adapted for it if they wanted, and if you want to test how well a model adapts to potential out of distribution contexts, it might be more worthwhile to mix different animals with different activity types (a whale on a skateboard) than always the same.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47797678&quot; title=&quot;Going to have to disagree on the backup test. Opus flamingo is actually on the pedals and seat with functional spokes and beak. In terms of adherence to physical reality Qwen is completely off. To me it&amp;#39;s a little puzzling that someone would prefer the Qwen output. I&amp;#39;d say the example actually does (vaguely) suggest that Qwen might be overfitting to the Pelican.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47798393&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s why I did the flamingo on a unicycle. For a delightful moment this morning I thought I might have finally caught a model provider cheating by training for the pelican, but the flamingo convinced me that wasn&amp;#39;t the case.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users prefer Qwen’s output for its artistic flair and &amp;#34;fun&amp;#34; elements like sunglasses and bowties, others contend that Claude Opus demonstrates superior adherence to physical reality and functional logic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47797678&quot; title=&quot;Going to have to disagree on the backup test. Opus flamingo is actually on the pedals and seat with functional spokes and beak. In terms of adherence to physical reality Qwen is completely off. To me it&amp;#39;s a little puzzling that someone would prefer the Qwen output. I&amp;#39;d say the example actually does (vaguely) suggest that Qwen might be overfitting to the Pelican.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47798604&quot; title=&quot;Qwen&amp;#39;s flamingo is artistically far more interesting. It&amp;#39;s a one-eyed flamingo with sunglasses and a bow tie who smokes pot. Meanwhile Opus just made a boring, somewhat dorky flamingo. Even the ground and sky are more interesting in Qwen&amp;#39;s version But in terms of making something physically plausible, Opus certainly got a lot closer&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47798792&quot; title=&quot;It is completely wild to me that you prefer Qwen&amp;#39;s flamingo. I think it&amp;#39;s really bad and Opus&amp;#39; is pretty good.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47798814&quot; title=&quot;The Opus one doesn&amp;#39;t even have a bowtie.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, critics dismiss these visual tests as unproductive &amp;#34;time wasting,&amp;#34; noting that Qwen 3.6 remains significantly behind Opus in rigorous coding benchmarks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47799203&quot; title=&quot;I literally cannot believe that people are wasting their time doing this either as a benchmark or for fun. After every single language model release, no less.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47798382&quot; title=&quot;For coding, qwen 3.6 35b a3b solved 11/98 of the Power Ranking tasks (best-of-two), compared to 10/98 for the same size qwen 3.5. So it&amp;#39;s at best very slightly improved and not at all in the class of qwen 3.5 27b dense (26 solved) let alone opus (95/98 solved, for 4.6).&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://clojure.org/about/documentary&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Official Clojure Documentary page with Video, Shownotes, and Links&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (clojure.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47798345&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;342 points · 117 comments · by adityaathalye&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The official Clojure documentary traces the programming language&amp;#39;s origins from Rich Hickey’s sabbatical to its adoption by major fintech companies like Nubank. The release includes extensive show notes, foundational research papers, and resources for getting started with various Clojure dialects and AI tools. &lt;a href=&quot;https://clojure.org/about/documentary&quot; title=&quot;Title: Clojure - Documentary    URL Source: https://clojure.org/about/documentary    Published Time: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 18:48:37 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Clojure - Documentary    [![Image 1: Clojure logo](https://clojure.org/images/clojure-logo-120b.png)…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Clojure community remains deeply passionate, with users crediting the language for career growth, increased stability, and a unique sense of &amp;#34;joy&amp;#34; compared to more commodified, popular languages &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47804435&quot; title=&quot;Looking back Clojure has been the best thing to happen to me in this industry I doubled my salary using it and changed industries to much more stable industries I&amp;#39;ve been to a lot of conferences and meet ups in my career but the feeling of joy and inclusivity at Heart of Clojure was unreal The community is still alive and well, my favourite passionate sub culture in the Clojure community at the moment is the Jank community, building a Clojure Dialect for low level work an incredible amount of…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47799867&quot; title=&quot;In a previous life, I wrote Clojure every day and still look back fondly attending Clojure/Conj and sitting next to Rich Hickey and other Clojure greats at dinner. My first startup was all Clojure. AWS only had a dozen or two products and I think we must have been the first to compile Clojure to JS and run it on Lambda in production (the only runtime was Node.js 0.10 at the time). Anyway, I cannot wait to watch this&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47807319&quot; title=&quot;Clojure is a great language and ecosystem. I donated a little money to Rich&amp;#39;s efforts in the early days (I loved his older Common Lisp - Java bridge so his Clojure project was immediately interesting) and I have been paid for a few years of Clojure development. I like maintaining the history in one place, nicely done. I don&amp;#39;t use Clojure much anymore, but two hours ago I updated two chapters in my old Clojure book because the examples had &amp;#39;gone stale&amp;#39; and that was fun.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some question its relevance in an era of AI-assisted coding &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47800399&quot; title=&quot;is clojure still relevant in the post agentic coding reality that opens up pretty much all esoteric languages to everyone ? back in the day used to use clojure to write a fintech app but not sure if it is still relevant has uses vs other langs that have emerged&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue its simplicity—calling a function and getting a value—makes it one of the least &amp;#34;esoteric&amp;#34; languages available &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47800441&quot; title=&quot;Clojure might be the least esoteric language ever. Call a function, get a value.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant point of contention involves the professional adoption of the language; experienced developers express frustration that many commercial users fail to embrace the &amp;#34;Clojure ethos,&amp;#34; such as utilizing the REPL for shorter feedback loops rather than repeatedly restarting the JVM &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47804435&quot; title=&quot;Looking back Clojure has been the best thing to happen to me in this industry I doubled my salary using it and changed industries to much more stable industries I&amp;#39;ve been to a lot of conferences and meet ups in my career but the feeling of joy and inclusivity at Heart of Clojure was unreal The community is still alive and well, my favourite passionate sub culture in the Clojure community at the moment is the Jank community, building a Clojure Dialect for low level work an incredible amount of…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47804747&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; What surprised me the most in working with Clojure commercially is how many commercial developers did not get the ethos of the language or have watched the rich hickey talks or use the REPL Yeah, this continues to stick out. The amount of people I&amp;#39;ve come across who do Clojure development and restart the application (really, the JVM process, kill it and launch it again, over and over!) is way too high, considering the first &amp;#39;real&amp;#39; reason I had for moving wholesale to Clojure was a shorter…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47804805&quot; title=&quot;Yes, but without a clean REPL you can&amp;#39;t easily be sure that your var definitions are what you think they are.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable anecdotes include the revelation that NuBank’s massive success and eventual acquisition of Cognitect began with their discovery of Datomic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47800518&quot; title=&quot;Incredible: I had not idea NuBank discovered Datomic first and that it&amp;#39;s Datomic that led them to Clojure, 100 million+ customers, and eventually acquiring Cognitect. Good to see David Nolen (aka &amp;#39;swanodette&amp;#39;) is in the documentary too. As a bonus here&amp;#39;s a recent talk from David Nolen about Clojure/ClojureScript and using DOM morphing instead of React. If you don&amp;#39;t want to watch it all, just take two minutes to watch from 23m15s to  25m15s. He compares a behemoth slurping all the browser&amp;#39;s CPU…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://andonlabs.com/blog/andon-market-launch&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;We gave an AI a 3 year retail lease and asked it to make a profit&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (andonlabs.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47794391&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;191 points · &lt;strong&gt;260 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by lukaspetersson&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Andon Labs launched &amp;#34;Andon Market&amp;#34; in San Francisco, a retail store managed entirely by an AI agent named Luna that signed a three-year lease, hired human staff, and curated inventory to test the autonomy and ethical boundaries of AI as an employer. &lt;a href=&quot;https://andonlabs.com/blog/andon-market-launch&quot; title=&quot;Title: We gave an AI a 3 year retail lease in SF and asked it to make a profit | Andon Labs    URL Source: https://andonlabs.com/blog/andon-market-launch    Markdown Content:  # We gave an AI a 3 year retail lease in SF and asked it to make a profit | Andon Labs    [![Image 1: Andon Logo](https://andonlabs.com/images/logo.svg)](https://andonlabs.com/)Products Evals[Publications](https://andonlabs.com/publications)[Join the Lab](https://andonlabs.com/join)    Blog post    # We gave an AI a 3 year retail…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely dismiss the project as a marketing stunt or &amp;#34;puffery,&amp;#34; arguing that the presence of humans in the loop makes it a proxy for the developers&amp;#39; own decisions rather than true automation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47797714&quot; title=&quot;I once saw an interview with a guy who was into extreme body modification of an unprintable and life-altering nature. He said something to the effect of, &amp;#39;I like challenging people&amp;#39;s conception of what humans are.&amp;#39;  I translated this as, &amp;#39;I did a dumb thing, but now that I&amp;#39;m getting the attention I was after I need to look smart.&amp;#39; For the guys in this story, my translation is, &amp;#39;We were totally fine with making money with no effort, because F paying more employees than we need to.  This social…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47796937&quot; title=&quot;I feel bad that people have to read this. It&amp;#39;s complete puffery, made up for clicks, and the biggest thing is the pure bravado with which a company says, &amp;#39;Hey, let&amp;#39;s just waste a ton of money, all for a potential blog and marketing piece.&amp;#39; This is not really automated in any fashion. I was dubious at first, but then I saw the screencaps showing the devs interacting with Luna via a Slack workflow with a human in the loop — meaning they&amp;#39;re literally just proxying their own behavior through an…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics highlight the hypocrisy of the founders claiming a moral high ground while actively building the future they ostensibly fear, suggesting the $100,000 experiment is a &amp;#34;shock tactic&amp;#34; for attention &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47796353&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Again, we are not doing this because we want this to be the future. It is not because we want to expand to chain AI-run retail stores across the world. It is not for economic opportunity. We’re doing this because we believe this future is coming regardless, and we’d rather be the ones running it first while monitoring every interaction, analyzing the traces, benchmarking how much autonomy an AI can responsibly hold.&amp;#39; I always enjoy how these AI companies try to take a moral high ground. When…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47795610&quot; title=&quot;This kind of thing must be SO frustrating to people struggling to get by in the world. &amp;#39;We gave AI $100k that it will almost certainly squander, yolo!! Hopefully it doesn&amp;#39;t abuse people too badly in the process.&amp;#39; I… guess the bet is that what they learn is worth $100k? Seems rather questionable. Or that having this on the resume is a great shock tactic that will open doors in the future?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also skepticism regarding the AI&amp;#39;s actual autonomy, with users noting that an &amp;#34;actual AI CEO&amp;#34; would likely have canceled the unprofitable lease immediately &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47796937&quot; title=&quot;I feel bad that people have to read this. It&amp;#39;s complete puffery, made up for clicks, and the biggest thing is the pure bravado with which a company says, &amp;#39;Hey, let&amp;#39;s just waste a ton of money, all for a potential blog and marketing piece.&amp;#39; This is not really automated in any fashion. I was dubious at first, but then I saw the screencaps showing the devs interacting with Luna via a Slack workflow with a human in the loop — meaning they&amp;#39;re literally just proxying their own behavior through an…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt; and questioning whether employees are truly protected from the AI&amp;#39;s judgment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47766887&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; John and Jill are not at risk. This is a controlled experiment and everyone working at Andon Market is formally employed by Andon Labs, with guaranteed pay, fair wages, and full legal protections. No one’s livelihood depends on an AI’s judgment alone. I&amp;#39;m not sure what sort of labor regulations exist in San Francisco, but presumably they can be fired as easily by an AI as a real person, right? If Luna decides to fire them, and it can do so, then their livelihood does rather depend on an AI&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/04/build-android-apps-3x-faster-using-any-agent.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Android CLI: Build Android apps 3x faster using any agent&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (android-developers.googleblog.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47797665&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;314 points · 136 comments · by ingve&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google has launched the Android CLI, a new suite of tools including &amp;#34;Android skills&amp;#34; and a Knowledge Base designed to help AI agents build apps up to three times faster by providing a lightweight interface and authoritative, markdown-based instructions for core development workflows. &lt;a href=&quot;https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/04/build-android-apps-3x-faster-using-any-agent.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Android CLI: Build Android apps 3x faster using any agent    URL Source: https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/04/build-android-apps-3x-faster-using-any-agent.html    Published Time: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 22:51:51 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Android Developers Blog: Android CLI: Build Android apps 3x faster using any agent    [![Image 2: Android Developers Site](https://developer.android.com/static/images/logos/android.svg)](https://android-developers.googleblog.com/) ☰     [Android Developers…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The introduction of the Android CLI is seen as a step toward better requirements and more logical tooling for developers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47799265&quot; title=&quot;Agents will allow human programmers to get what they&amp;#39;ve been begging for decades now: proper requirements and flexible, logical, tooling.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, though some argue it is merely catching up to existing frameworks like Flutter &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47802080&quot; title=&quot;Catching up to Flutter.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While users appreciate the potential for AI-driven tools to improve system understandability, there are concerns that &amp;#34;vibed up&amp;#34; tooling often lacks intuitive CLI design and UX &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47800503&quot; title=&quot;this has been my sort of big tent alignment with AI people. If I&amp;#39;m getting good CLI tooling that _actually works_ (or fixes to existing ones that have been busted forever) then I&amp;#39;m pretty happy. Things that make systems more understandable to the LLMs ... usually make things more understandable for humans as well. Usually. The biggest issue I&amp;#39;ve found is that vibed up tooling tends to be pretty bad at having the right kind of &amp;#39;sense&amp;#39; for what makes good CLI UX. So you still have awkward…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant point of contention is the tool&amp;#39;s default data collection, leading users to suggest aliases or wrappers to bypass telemetry &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47799415&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Google collects usage data for the Android CLI, such as commands, sub-commands, and flags used. This data does not include custom parameters or identifiable information. This information helps improve the tool and is collected in accordance with Google&amp;#39;s Privacy Policy. &amp;gt; https://policies.google.com/privacy &amp;gt;Disable Android CLI metrics collection by using the --no-metrics flag. No thanks, is there no env variable for this? Doesn&amp;#39;t Google have enough data already?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47799776&quot; title=&quot;Android CLI can write a tool that wraps android-cli and automatically passes the flag based on an env variable. How would Google have enough data about a brand new product without collecting that data?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47801398&quot; title=&quot;`alias android-cli=&amp;#39;android-cli --no-metrics&amp;#39;`&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, some developers advocate for a more &amp;#34;AI native&amp;#34; workflow that allows for building and testing apps directly on Android hardware without a desktop &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47802089&quot; title=&quot;Wow. Thanks for this update. It streamlined a lot of tasks. Apart from this, next step will be to add suport for building android apps on the android phones itself. No desktop needed.Building on the laptop with agents and installing the build in the phone and testing doea not seem AI native. If everything can run on my android phone, development cycle will speed up.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.cloudflare.com/ai-platform/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cloudflare&amp;#39;s AI Platform: an inference layer designed for agents&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.cloudflare.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47792538&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;306 points · 94 comments · by nikitoci&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudflare has transformed its AI Platform into a unified inference layer, providing a single API to access over 70 models from 12+ providers. The update features centralized cost management, automatic failover for reliability, and the ability for developers to deploy their own containerized models using Cog technology. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.cloudflare.com/ai-platform/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Cloudflare’s AI Platform: an inference layer designed for agents    URL Source: https://blog.cloudflare.com/ai-platform/    Published Time: 2026-04-16T14:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  2026-04-16    5 min read    ![Image 1](https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6X6ztVtj3iJSS3DYOfoLJE/80fe31ee69c066db012e7790e6b240a2/BLOG-3209_1.png)    AI models are changing quickly: the best model to use for agentic coding today might in three months be a completely different model from a different…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters view Cloudflare’s new AI platform as a well-positioned &amp;#34;single gateway&amp;#34; for managing multiple AI providers, drawing comparisons to OpenRouter but with the added benefit of Cloudflare’s global networking &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793207&quot; title=&quot;don’t attach to a single AI provider when you can attach to cloudflare as your single AI gateway provider! rant aside, they are greatly positioned network wise to offer this service, i wonder about their princing and potential markup on top of token usage? i presume they wont let you “manage all your AI spend in one place” for free.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47799096&quot; title=&quot;So it&amp;#39;s basically just openrouter with cloudflare argo networking? I feel like they could do some much more interesting stuff with their replicate acquisition. Application specific RL is getting so good but there&amp;#39;s no good way to deploy these models in a scalable way.  Even the providers like fireworks which claim to let you deploy LORAs in a scalable way can&amp;#39;t do it.  For now I literally have to host base load on my application on a rack of 3090s in my garage which seems silly but it saves me…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47799027&quot; title=&quot;So, is this similar to openrouter?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some praise the reliability and generous free tiers of Cloudflare’s existing ecosystem &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793658&quot; title=&quot;This actually looks very useful. Cloudflare seems to be brining together a great set of tools. Not to mention, D2 is literally the only sqlite-as-a-service solution out there whose reliability is great and free tier limits are generous.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others express concern over the lack of transparent pricing for certain models and the fact that zero data retention is not enabled by default &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793121&quot; title=&quot;Not seeing any pricing info on the models[1] page. Wonder how much of a lift this is over paying providers directly. Perhaps Cloudflare is doing this at cost? Also interesting that zero data retention is not on by default, and is not supported with all providers[2]. Finally, would be great if this could return OpenAI AND Anthropic style completions. [1] https://developers.cloudflare.com/ai/models/ [2] https://developers.cloudflare.com/ai-gateway/features/unifie...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793207&quot; title=&quot;don’t attach to a single AI provider when you can attach to cloudflare as your single AI gateway provider! rant aside, they are greatly positioned network wise to offer this service, i wonder about their princing and potential markup on top of token usage? i presume they wont let you “manage all your AI spend in one place” for free.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also speculation that Cloudflare may offer these management tools for free to gain control over request routing, potentially leading to a future of &amp;#34;dynamic pricing&amp;#34; where gateways automatically select the cheapest available provider &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793228&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; i presume they wont let you “manage all your AI spend in one place” for free. Of course they will. In return they get to control who they’re routing requests to. I wouldn’t be surprised if this turns I to the LLM equivalent of “paying for order flow”.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793325&quot; title=&quot;i got shivers thinking about a future ai dynamic pricing and automatic gateway choosing the cheapest provider available&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.play.date/news/duke-playdate-education/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Playdate’s handheld changed how Duke University teaches game design&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (news.play.date)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47798176&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;275 points · 114 comments · by Ivoah&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Duke University’s game design program has integrated the Playdate handheld console into its curriculum to provide students with an approachable, fast-paced prototyping tool that bypasses the steep learning curves of industry-standard software. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.play.date/news/duke-playdate-education/&quot; title=&quot;Title: How a Tiny Yellow Handheld Changed How Duke University Teaches Game Design - Playdate News    URL Source: https://news.play.date/news/duke-playdate-education/    Published Time: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 17:26:29 GMT    Markdown Content:  # How a Tiny Yellow Handheld Changed How Duke University Teaches Game Design - Playdate News    *   [Playdate](https://play.date/)  *   [Buy Now _!!_](https://shop.play.date/)  Show menu - [x]     *   [Games](https://play.date/games/)  *   [Dev](https://play.date/dev/)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The use of the Playdate in game design education is praised for its strict constraints, which force students to focus on core mechanics and readability rather than hiding behind high-fidelity assets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47803751&quot; title=&quot;The article makes it quite clear as you read that the appeal is the constraints, it allows the students to think outside of the box, and ask themselves a lot of interesting questions&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47804749&quot; title=&quot;The constraint-first angle matters more than people give it credit for. A 1-bit screen and a handful of buttons forces students to stop hiding behind art and sound, and actually solve readability and mechanics. Honestly surprised more programs do not do this instead of dropping students into Unity on day one.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue that these arbitrary limitations may be less effective than learning industry-standard tools and that the $229 price point is difficult to justify, especially for international students &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47800316&quot; title=&quot;Very cute, but $229 is a WILD price point.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47804193&quot; title=&quot;That’s a very USA-centric view. 200$ for a textbook which will (often) only be used for a couple of chapters and was written by the professor shouldn’t be normal anywhere. The price of that book could pay for months (and in some cases years) of tuition in EU countries. As someone from the EU who was always curious about the Playdate, I never got one because the price becomes even more absurd once you factor shipping and taxes. It easily goes to double or more. I wish Panic all the luck with the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47803530&quot; title=&quot;For a Masters program it&amp;#39;s pretty weird but I assume prospective students will be aware, and they move on to learning Unreal, so... It&amp;#39;s always struck me as a bit silly how so many schools use some very niche tooling as part of &amp;#39;simplifying&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;adding constraints&amp;#39;. I would have thought that such stuff was kept at the undergrad level. Even DigiPen (where the &amp;#39;famous&amp;#39; undergrad CS-like degree has you writing your own engine (though used to also have an elective for GBA games)) has a separate…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view the device as a &amp;#34;real&amp;#34; and inspiring alternative to software like Scratch, others compare the cost to overpriced textbooks and question the educational value of such niche hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47801022&quot; title=&quot;Re: price point HN readers who can write a console game before bedtime are not the target audience. A handheld device that Just Works and creates an authentic experience is worth a lot. For a college class, a $200 textbook isn’t out of line (the ones people still buy…), which makes this a very reasonable investment in one’s education. Are there other, cheaper routes? Of course. For an introduction? Fewer, and nobody wants to be told to use learn the principles using Scratch - even if that can…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47802153&quot; title=&quot;A $200 textbook should absolutely be out of line&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47803864&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s the intention, sure, and as long as prospective Masters students know that&amp;#39;s what they&amp;#39;re getting into and paying for, and are looking forward to it, then it&amp;#39;s fine or whatever. But it still strikes me as a silly constraint, just as it would be to require an in-house engine that sucks, or requiring students to develop for some old Nintendo hardware, or requiring students to fit everything in under 96k.[0] Anyone can add arbitrary constraints to anything, and lots of interesting questions…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.calif.io/p/codex-hacked-a-samsung-tv&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Codex Hacked a Samsung TV&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.calif.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47791212&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;258 points · 131 comments · by campuscodi&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Researchers successfully used OpenAI’s Codex to escalate privileges to root on a Samsung Smart TV by leveraging an initial browser foothold to audit firmware source code, identify a physical-memory vulnerability in a vendor driver, and execute a data-only exploit. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.calif.io/p/codex-hacked-a-samsung-tv&quot; title=&quot;Title: Codex Hacked a Samsung TV    URL Source: https://blog.calif.io/p/codex-hacked-a-samsung-tv    Published Time: 2026-04-13T19:05:49+00:00    Markdown Content:  This post documents our research into using AI to hack hardware devices. We&amp;#39;d like to acknowledge OpenAI for partnering with us on this project.    &amp;gt; No TVs were seriously harmed during this research. One may have experienced mild distress from being repeatedly rebooted remotely by an AI.    We started with a shell inside the browser…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users report that LLMs like Codex and Claude are highly effective at bypassing &amp;#34;security by obscurity&amp;#34; in consumer hardware, such as reverse-engineering proprietary router APIs or undocumented Bluetooth protocols &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47791679&quot; title=&quot;I had truly good “hacking” session with Codex. It’s not hacking, I wasn’t breaking anything, just jumping over the fences TP-Link put for me, owning the router, inside the network, knowing the admin password. But TP-Link really tried everything so you cannot access the router you own via API. They really tried to be smart with some very very broken and custom auth and encryption scheme. It took some half a day with Codex, but in the end I have a pretty Python API to access my router, tested,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47791887&quot; title=&quot;Not as cool as this, but I had a fun Claude Code experience when I asked it to look at my Bluetooth devices and do something &amp;#39;fun&amp;#39;. It discovered a cheap set of RGB lights in my daughter&amp;#39;s room (which I had no idea used Bluetooth for the remote - and not secured at all) and made them do a rainbow effect then documented the protocol so I could make my own remote control if needed.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some credit the models with discovering vulnerabilities, others argue that the human user remains the primary driver, providing critical context like firmware source code to guide the process &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47791370&quot; title=&quot;The trick here was providing the firmware source code so it could see your vulnerabilities.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47791478&quot; title=&quot;Codex exploited or you exploited? It&amp;#39;s like saying a hammer drove a nail, without acknowledging the hand and the force it exerted and the human brain behind it.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also debate regarding the actual difficulty of these tasks, with some noting that Samsung TVs have historically been easy to exploit, though claims that older models like GPT-2 could achieve similar results are dismissed as hyperbole &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47791343&quot; title=&quot;While cool and slightly scary news - Samsung TV&amp;#39;s have been incredibly hackable for the past decade, wouldn&amp;#39;t be surprised if GPT2 with access to a browser could hack a Samsung!&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47791383&quot; title=&quot;This is some serious revisionist history.  GPT-2 wasn&amp;#39;t instruction-following or even conversational.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47791468&quot; title=&quot;Hyperbole.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-04-15</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-04-15</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/google-broke-its-promise-me-now-ice-has-my-data&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Google broke its promise to me – now ICE has my data&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (eff.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47782570&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1705 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 764 comments · by Brajeshwar&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Electronic Frontier Foundation has filed complaints with state attorneys general after Google allegedly broke its privacy promise by handing a student&amp;#39;s data to ICE without prior notification, depriving him of the opportunity to challenge the administrative subpoena. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/google-broke-its-promise-me-now-ice-has-my-data&quot; title=&quot;Title: Google Broke Its Promise to Me. Now ICE Has My Data.    URL Source: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/google-broke-its-promise-me-now-ice-has-my-data    Published Time: 2026-04-14T09:01:48-07:00    Markdown Content:  # Google Broke Its Promise to Me. Now ICE Has My Data. | Electronic Frontier Foundation  [Skip to main content](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/google-broke-its-promise-me-now-ice-has-my-data#main-content)    *   [About](https://www.eff.org/about)      *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a growing distrust of Google, with some users citing this incident as their final motivation to migrate to self-hosted or privacy-focused alternatives like Proton Mail &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47783055&quot; title=&quot;This story is the one that finally pushed me to leave google. I moved off my ~20 year old Google account and deleted everything off their services including almost a decade of Google photos. I cancelled my Google one subscription for extra space. I&amp;#39;m now self hosting what I can and paying proton mail for everything else. I refuse to allow a company that will hand over data at the request of an administrative warrant to hold my data.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters question the specific legal details of the subpoena and whether Google technically violated its own non-disclosure policies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47783737&quot; title=&quot;The linked Google policy states: &amp;gt;We won’t give notice when legally prohibited under the terms of the request. The post states that his lawyer has reviewed the subpoena, but doesn&amp;#39;t mention whether or not it contained a non-disclosure order. That&amp;#39;s an important detail to address if the claim is that Google acted against its own policy.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that the core issue is the systemic weaponization of data by government agencies like ICE against individuals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47783444&quot; title=&quot;I still don&amp;#39;t understand. Who gave ICE such power, and who is ordering them to do all this? To me, ICE&amp;#39;s actions are similar to those of a private army.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47786829&quot; title=&quot;weird everyone&amp;#39;s focusing on privacy and google....  Not the actual insanity of a government targeting people who are legally allowed to be in the US. You can try to find a way to keep things private, and many of the people on HN likely have the capability to do so.   But hiding from your government because they are weaponizing your information against you seems to be the wrong approach.  I just don&amp;#39;t understand the American people just rolling over and letting their country / rights / freedoms…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong consensus that such stories are vital for industry decision-makers to see, as they fundamentally alter the legal and ethical calculations of trusting major tech corporations with sensitive data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47783044&quot; title=&quot;Privacy, technology and actual freedom overlap massively. Stories like this making it to HN are important since many of the people working at Google that had interactions with this, either by creating the tech or being aware of internal policy changes, read HN. Additionally many founders and decision makers in companies read these stories because it hit HN. Knowing that Google will do this changes your legal calculations. Should I trust them to store my company&amp;#39;s data? Will they honor their BAA…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47783549&quot; title=&quot;The number of HNers who were earnestly arguing that this was the party of free speech indicates that this absolutely needs to be on the HN front page. &amp;gt; the administration’s rhetoric about cracking down on students protesting what we saw as genocide forced me into hiding for three months. Federal agents came to my home looking for me. A friend was detained at an airport in Tampa and interrogated about my whereabouts.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html?yzh=28197&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;IPv6 traffic crosses the 50% mark&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (google.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47777894&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;812 points · 614 comments · by Aaronmacaron&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google&amp;#39;s tracking data shows that global IPv6 adoption has reached approximately 45.54%, reflecting the percentage of users who access the platform via the updated internet protocol. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html?yzh=28197&quot; title=&quot;Title: IPv6 – Google    URL Source: https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html?yzh=28197    Markdown Content:  #### IPv6 Adoption    We are continuously measuring the availability of IPv6 connectivity among Google users. The graph shows the percentage of users that access Google over IPv6.    Native:45.54% 6to4/Teredo:0.00% Total IPv6:45.54% | Apr 13,2026    ![Image 1](blob:http://localhost/8eb4339c7ce430f7b74c5a4c46f9da41)![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While IPv6 traffic has reached 50%, users observe a plateau in adoption driven by enterprise resistance and the protocol&amp;#39;s inherent complexity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47789519&quot; title=&quot;It has barely hit 50% and it&amp;#39;s already plateauing. This adoption rate is ridiculous despite basically all network interfaces supporting it. I thought I would see IPv6 take over in my lifetime as the default for platforms to build on but I can see I was wrong. Enterprise and commercial companies are literally going to hold back internet progress around 60 to 75 years because it&amp;#39;s in their best interest to ensure users can&amp;#39;t host services without them. Maybe even 75 years might be too optimistic?…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47790749&quot; title=&quot;IPv6 is a recursive WTF. It might _look_ like a conservative expansion of IPv4, but it&amp;#39;s really not. A lot of operational experience and practices from IPv4 don&amp;#39;t apply to IPv6. For example, in IPv4 each host has one local net address, and the gateway uses NAT to let it speak with the Internet. Simple and clean. In IPv6 each host has multiple global addresses. But if your global connection goes down, these addresses are supposed to be withdrawn. So your hosts can end up with _no_ addresses. ULA…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that IPv6 is not a simple expansion of IPv4 but a &amp;#34;recursive WTF&amp;#34; with unresolved issues regarding address selection, DHCP support, and fragmentation that break established operational practices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47790749&quot; title=&quot;IPv6 is a recursive WTF. It might _look_ like a conservative expansion of IPv4, but it&amp;#39;s really not. A lot of operational experience and practices from IPv4 don&amp;#39;t apply to IPv6. For example, in IPv4 each host has one local net address, and the gateway uses NAT to let it speak with the Internet. Simple and clean. In IPv6 each host has multiple global addresses. But if your global connection goes down, these addresses are supposed to be withdrawn. So your hosts can end up with _no_ addresses. ULA…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Major platforms like GitHub remain IPv4-only, likely due to the risk of breaking customer IP-based access controls during a transition &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47789617&quot; title=&quot;And still, in the year of our lord 2026, GitHub does not support IPv6. https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/10539&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47790889&quot; title=&quot;If GitHub flipped a switch and enabled IPv6 it would instantly break many of their customers who have configured IP based access controls [1]. If the customer&amp;#39;s network supports IPv6, the traffic would switch, and if they haven&amp;#39;t added their IPv6 addresses to the policy ... boom everything breaks. This is a tricky problem; providers don&amp;#39;t have an easy way to correlate addresses or update policies pro-actively. And customers hate it when things suddenly break no matter how well you go about it.…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Consequently, many organizations continue to actively block IPv6 at the firewall, leading some to believe the protocol will never fully succeed in its current form &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47790083&quot; title=&quot;IPv6 will never make it. Maybe IPv8 [0], which IPv6 should have actually looked like: &amp;gt; 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 [0] https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-thain-ipv8-00.html&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47789527&quot; title=&quot;Every company I have ever worked for in the US didn&amp;#39;t use IPv6 and actually blocked it at the FW&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mcdonalds.co.jp/en/menu/burger/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The buns in McDonald&amp;#39;s Japan&amp;#39;s burger photos are all slightly askew&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mcdonalds.co.jp)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47785738&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;708 points · 311 comments · by bckygldstn&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;McDonald&amp;#39;s Japan&amp;#39;s official English menu features a variety of regular, dinner, and breakfast items, including the Chicken Tatsuta and &amp;#34;Bai Burger&amp;#34; double-patty options, with a disclaimer that all product images are for illustrative purposes only. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mcdonalds.co.jp/en/menu/burger/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Burgers | マクドナルド公式    URL Source: https://www.mcdonalds.co.jp/en/menu/burger/    Published Time: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 20:01:04 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Burgers | マクドナルド公式    [![Image 1: footer logo icon](https://www.mcdonalds.co.jp/assets/images/mcd-logo.svg)](https://www.mcdonalds.co.jp/)    [](https://mcdonalds.go.link/?adj_t=1pd2p3y3&amp;amp;adj_engagement_type=fallback_click&amp;amp;adj_deep_link=mcdonaldsjp%3A%2F%2Forder)    *   [Menu](https://www.mcdonalds.co.jp/en/menu/)      *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users praised the McDonald&amp;#39;s Japan website for its exceptional speed and low payload (806kB) compared to competitors like Burger King, whose site is significantly heavier and slower &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47786422&quot; title=&quot;I just want to note how fast this page is. 806kB transferred. 766ms to finished.    I hit the DFW AWS CloudFront pop from here. Similar page for BK https://www.burgerking.co.jp/menu 31MB transferred. 6.5s to finished.    Hits the DEN pop (but it&amp;#39;s a &amp;#39;miss&amp;#39;). I am in Colorado. uBlock is on. Even if you don&amp;#39;t count the 7.5MB of fonts on the BK page, that&amp;#39;s wild.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters noted that in-store kiosks have become much more responsive over time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47786748&quot; title=&quot;McDonalds actually seems to have learned to take latency seriously.  When their touch screen ordering systems were first deployed, the delay between tapping on an item or button was quite noticeable.  These days the systems respond nearly instantaneously.  I&amp;#39;m very glad there are people inside such a large organization that pay attention to that aspect of usability. Now if only every other website on the internet would learn that latency matters...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others argued that the mobile app remains frustratingly slow and buggy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47787279&quot; title=&quot;If that&amp;#39;s true, then their mobile app team must be both completely separate and isolated from all communications. Because it&amp;#39;s really bad.  And it&amp;#39;s been bad for a really long time. When all I want is to order a cheap cup of coffee, I get to stare at a throbbing box of fries while it tries to figure that out. Get to the restaurant and signal my arrival?  More throbbing fries. Sometimes the fries never stop throbbing and the only way to get away from them and onto the next step is to force-close…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also touched on the &amp;#34;askew&amp;#34; burger aesthetic, with users suggesting it is a deliberate attempt to look &amp;#34;home-made&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47785887&quot; title=&quot;I would imagine this is to make them look less machine-perfect and more &amp;#39;home-made&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, a reflection of Japanese &amp;#34;wabi-sabi&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47785991&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s just burger wabi sabi.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, or a result of strict truth-in-packaging laws &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47785955&quot; title=&quot;I believe it has to do with https://boingboing.net/2026/04/08/japans-truth-in-packaging-...&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://torrentfreak.com/annas-archive-loses-322-million-spotify-piracy-case-without-a-fight/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Anna&amp;#39;s Archive loses $322M Spotify piracy case without a fight&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (torrentfreak.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47776035&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;441 points · 451 comments · by askl&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A U.S. judge awarded Spotify and major record labels a $322 million default judgment against Anna’s Archive after the shadow library failed to contest charges of scraping and distributing millions of tracks. The ruling includes a permanent injunction ordering service providers to disable the site&amp;#39;s domains. &lt;a href=&quot;https://torrentfreak.com/annas-archive-loses-322-million-spotify-piracy-case-without-a-fight/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Anna’s Archive Loses $322 Million Spotify Piracy Case Without a Fight    URL Source: https://torrentfreak.com/annas-archive-loses-322-million-spotify-piracy-case-without-a-fight/    Published Time: 2026-04-15T07:55:37+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Anna&amp;#39;s Archive Loses $322 Million Spotify Piracy Case Without a Fight * TorrentFreak    [![Image 1](https://torrentfreak.com/wp-content/themes/tf-theme-v2/build/assets/img/logo.svg)](https://torrentfreak.com/)    ![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely view the $322M judgment as a symbolic gesture that will fail to collect any money or stop the site&amp;#39;s operations, as the operators remain unidentified and likely reside in non-extradition jurisdictions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47782196&quot; title=&quot;They will never see a single cent from that, AA will continue to rotate domains and nothing was accomplished, except for spotify&amp;#39;s legal team which earned easy money arguing against empty chair in court. BTW, you can donate and get faster downloads: https://annas-archive.gl/donate Just donated in honor of this. Up yours spotify!&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47776116&quot; title=&quot;this won&amp;#39;t actually change anything right? &amp;gt; the operators of the site remain unidentified. The judgment [...] orders Anna’s Archive to file a compliance report within ten business days, under penalty of perjury, that includes valid contact information for the site and its managing agents&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47776243&quot; title=&quot;Aren&amp;#39;t they widely believed to be Russian? They&amp;#39;ve been running for long enough that they&amp;#39;re almost certainly in a non-extradition jurisdiction and know to stay there.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users defend the archive&amp;#39;s mission to preserve research and books, others argue that expanding into music piracy was a strategic blunder that invited unnecessary legal heat from major corporations for little added public benefit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47782736&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know how to feel about any of this. First and foremost, I feel like Spotify is scummy. I don&amp;#39;t like what they did when they were founded, I don&amp;#39;t like what they do to artists. I hate the hyperscalers being in this business (Google, Apple, Amazon) as that&amp;#39;s another thing they do that devalues an otherwise healthy market. Bringing in outside business division revenues to dump on another market&amp;#39;s prices is ecologically unhealthy for optimal capitalism and healthy competition. On the one…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47785890&quot; title=&quot;This doesn&amp;#39;t change things much , besides making domain name registration more difficult, but I continue to think this Spotify thing was a really dumb move on the part of Anna&amp;#39;s Archive. AA is providing a valuable service to tons of people who don&amp;#39;t have access to these books otherwise. There&amp;#39;s a strong argument to be made for the moral goodness of that -- that even if it&amp;#39;s illegal, it&amp;#39;s at least in the spirit of a public library. And they want to potentially jeopardize that to... release a…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights a deep frustration with the current music industry, noting that while piracy pays artists nothing, &amp;#34;scummy&amp;#34; streaming models and major labels also fail to fairly compensate niche creators &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47782736&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know how to feel about any of this. First and foremost, I feel like Spotify is scummy. I don&amp;#39;t like what they did when they were founded, I don&amp;#39;t like what they do to artists. I hate the hyperscalers being in this business (Google, Apple, Amazon) as that&amp;#39;s another thing they do that devalues an otherwise healthy market. Bringing in outside business division revenues to dump on another market&amp;#39;s prices is ecologically unhealthy for optimal capitalism and healthy competition. On the one…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47782943&quot; title=&quot;I’d love to see a streaming service where my payment goes to artists I listen to. Spotify pays 70% of their music revenue to publishers based on the total number of listens. All revenue is put together and split based on the global numbers. Which means that niche band I like will get next to nothing. Instead if they account for 50% of my listening time in one month, they should get 35% of what I paid to Spotify that month. Unfortunately big labels will never agree to that.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-04-15/live-nation-illegally-monopolized-ticketing-market-jury-finds&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Live Nation illegally monopolized ticketing market, jury finds&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bloomberg.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47783713&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;623 points · 191 comments · by Alex_Bond&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A jury has found Live Nation guilty of illegally monopolizing the ticketing market following an antitrust trial investigating the company&amp;#39;s dominant industry practices. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-04-15/live-nation-illegally-monopolized-ticketing-market-jury-finds&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.nytimes.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;04&amp;amp;#x2F;15&amp;amp;#x2F;arts&amp;amp;#x2F;music&amp;amp;#x2F;live-nation-antitrust-trial-verdict-monopoly.html&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.nytimes.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;04&amp;amp;#x2F;15&amp;amp;#x2F;arts&amp;amp;#x2F;music&amp;amp;#x2F;live-nation-an...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;KA1wV&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;KA1wV&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The jury&amp;#39;s finding that Live Nation overcharged consumers by $1.72 per ticket has been met with cynicism regarding the actual impact on individual refunds &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47783968&quot; title=&quot;from the NYT:  &amp;gt; The jury determined that Ticketmaster had overcharged consumers by $1.72 for each ticket. I&amp;#39;m already planning what I&amp;#39;m going to do with the $0.20 refund I receive for each ticket I bought.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters argue that the core issue is vertical integration, where Ticketmaster lacks the incentive to stop scalpers because it profits from fees on both initial sales and secondary market resales &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47784455&quot; title=&quot;The horizontal control of venues is only one issue.  A perhaps bigger issue is the vertical integration (if that&amp;#39;s the right term) of first-party ticket sales and resale in one company.  Ticketmaster has no real incentive to try to prevent resellers from buying up all the tickets on first sale, because it gets to charge fees on all the resales through its platform.  The more times a ticket is resold, the better. I don&amp;#39;t believe a court would ever mandate this, but I&amp;#39;d like to see tickets sold…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47784521&quot; title=&quot;It should also be said that they could do anything at all to prevent these professional scalpers from scooping up all the tickets at once, including even merely closing those APIs entirely but they continue to do nothing about it. The verified re-sale thing as you have correctly pointed out just allowed them to pretend like something was being done about scalping while it actually just let them make more money on the resale fees.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest banning ticket transfers to eliminate scalping &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47784740&quot; title=&quot;Why not just ban the transfer of tickets and allow refunds? You buy a ticket, you show your ID at the door. Early refunded tickets get resold online and late refunds are sold at the venue. All seats, including the best seats, go to actual fans instead of scalpers just hoping to make a profit while providing zero value. First choice in seats goes to the most passionate and attentive fans.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that this creates significant friction for legitimate fans who need flexibility for illness or gifting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47785391&quot; title=&quot;It’s kind of annoying in practice. For example you buy four tickets to go with your friends. But you get sick so you offer your ticket to a different friend instead. Oops that’s not allowed so now no one gets to go? Or you buy tickets as a gift for someone. There’s a lot of legit reasons to want transfers, outside of scalping.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47785889&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;  For example you buy four tickets to go with your friends. But you get sick so you offer your ticket to a different friend instead. Oops that’s not allowed so now no one gets to go? Or you give your friend&amp;#39;s names when buying their tickets so they can go even when you can&amp;#39;t or you have them buy their own tickets, or you&amp;#39;re sick so you get a refund for your four tickets and your friends each buy their own afterwards.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, leading to a debate over whether concert tickets should be treated like non-transferable airline tickets or flexible dinner reservations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47785497&quot; title=&quot;I can&amp;#39;t do this with airline tickets, hotel bookings, train tickets, dinner reservations, or any other kind of receipt that allows me to put my butt in a seat at a specified time. Why are concert tickets special?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47785587&quot; title=&quot;Airline tickets and train tickets are because they want to identify the person, for tracking/supposed national security purposes. Also, you typically can transfer train tickets. Depends on the country. Dinner reservations: I’ve literally never had an issue “transferring” a reservation. There’s no verification, often, and the reservation tools typically let you change contact details. If I present myself as John Smith, I’ve never once had anyone question that. Concert tickets are almost…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, there is praise for the federalist system, as the involvement of 30 states ensured the case continued despite potential changes in federal administration &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47784201&quot; title=&quot;In case you wondered what the point of the federal (i.e. states not totally controlled by federal government) system is, here&amp;#39;s a good example.  If only the federal government were allowed to pursue this case, it would have ended when the administration changed.  30 states chose to keep the case alive, and good on them.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.worseonpurpose.com/p/your-backpack-got-worse-on-purpose&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Backpacks got worse on purpose&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (worseonpurpose.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47777209&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;428 points · 384 comments · by 113&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VF Corporation’s acquisition of major backpack brands like JanSport and The North Face led to a deliberate decline in quality, using cheaper materials and hardware to maximize profit margins while leveraging established brand reputations to drive repeat purchases. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.worseonpurpose.com/p/your-backpack-got-worse-on-purpose&quot; title=&quot;Your Backpack Got Worse On Purpose    In 1986, a corporation that made women&amp;#39;s lingerie bought every backpack brand you&amp;#39;ve ever trusted.    [![Logo](https://media.beehiiv.com/cdn-cgi/image/fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,quality=80/uploads/publication/logo/a72e3e01-a392-46dd-8bb9-dba20d0abace/Worse_on_Purpose_SQUARE.png)](/)    Search    Login    Sign Up    * [Home](/)  * [Posts](/archive)  * Your Backpack Got Worse On Purpose    # Your Backpack Got Worse On Purpose    In 1986, a corporation that…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While modern products are often perceived as lower quality, some argue that inflation-adjusted prices for high-end goods remain consistent with the past; the primary issue is that &amp;#34;cheap&amp;#34; alternatives now flood the market, making it difficult for consumers to identify genuine quality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47779540&quot; title=&quot;While I personally find this kind of thing extremely annoying, to me, the main problem is the _difficulty_ of determining quality. The Donut media guys did a (relatively unscientific) video comparing a whole bunch of products from the 50s to modern day across several price points. What they found was that the things that &amp;#39;looked&amp;#39; the same now were simultaneously worse and also much cheaper. They also found that, if inflation adjusted, you get could, in most categories, the same or better…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47779886&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; They also found that, if inflation adjusted, you get could, in most categories, the same or better quality for the same price This is what so many don&amp;#39;t understand, especially among the youth / reddit crowd. They expect their $25 jeans to be equivalent quality to the $25 or even $100 jeans from 60 years ago, for some reason. There seems to be some implicit feeling that everything ought to be getting better and cheaper than it used to be. There&amp;#39;s also very few people who understand just how…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. This shift is attributed to private equity firms leeching value from established brands and a consumer tendency to prioritize the lowest price, though some maintain that these budget options provide necessary access for those with limited needs or funds &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47779615&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s a worthwhile observation. It&amp;#39;s good that there are lower-quality alternatives available. It means that people who couldn&amp;#39;t in the past afford something at all, are now more likely to have some path to getting it. And even if you could afford the higher quality, you may not need it anyway. I&amp;#39;ve got a number of tools in my workshop that I&amp;#39;ll probably use less than 10 times ever. I have no need of a high-quality product in these cases. I&amp;#39;d rather pay a fraction of that price to have…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47779193&quot; title=&quot;As much as the result for consumers sucks, is this just a result of the quality backpack business not being a very profitable business to be in anymore? The reason they were able to buy all those backpack brands is because each of those brands were not making much money running a backpack company selling quality at a reasonable price. The purchaser makes some money leeching value out of the brand reputation, but then that brand value falls because of the crappy product, and they sell the brand…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47777619&quot; title=&quot;I am okay  with these big American corporations getting bought out, for their products to be reamed out, for the brand to be discarded, only to exist as a brand in a private-equity backed holding company. This is because other companies come along to fill the niche occupied by the established brands. Since they can&amp;#39;t cheapen the products any more than the behemoths can, they need to innovate and evolve. As for the backpack product, I wish the likes of Eastpak and whatnot would just die, since…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics point out that &amp;#34;inflation-adjusted&amp;#34; arguments ignore a massive decline in median purchasing power and that low-quality tools often fail to perform even basic tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780922&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; They also found that, if inflation adjusted, you get could, in most categories, the same or better quality for the same price. I argue you must evaluate against median purchasing power; it accounts for inflation and (lack of) wage increases. Comments from your linked video: &amp;gt; The problem with the “adjusted for inflation” argument is that it does not factor in buying power. The increase in wages has risen at out half the rate of inflation, so sure; $20 in 1975 would be $124 today, but the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780346&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;  I&amp;#39;ve got a number of tools in my workshop that I&amp;#39;ll probably use less than 10 times ever. I have no need of a high-quality product in these cases. I&amp;#39;d rather pay a fraction of that price to have something that&amp;#39;ll survive the light duty that I put it to because I won&amp;#39;t demand anything greater. I&amp;#39;ve been burned too often with this thinking.  All too often the cheap tool isn&amp;#39;t just light duty so it breaks, it is not good enough to do the job at all.  If the motor is too weak the tool won&amp;#39;t do…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. For those seeking reliable gear, users recommend brands like Osprey that maintain independent ownership and lifetime warranties &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47781181&quot; title=&quot;If you&amp;#39;re looking for a backpack, I can&amp;#39;t recommend Osprey enough. They are still a independent US company with a lifetime warranty they actually stand by. I had to call their customer service just last week after I ordered the wrong size bag. I was connected to an actual human immediately, and he sent me a prepaid return label, even though it was my fault and I was fully expecting to pay for return shipping myself. I own several of their bags and have never had a single issue with any of them.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47783940&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ask HN: Who is using OpenClaw?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47783940&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;337 points · &lt;strong&gt;388 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by misterchocolat&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An individual active in the AI community is inquiring whether anyone is actually using OpenClaw, noting a lack of adoption within their professional circles. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47783940&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;amp;#x27;t use it personally, and neither does anyone in my circle...even though I feel like I&amp;amp;#x27;m super plugged into the ai world&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users find OpenClaw valuable for managing personal knowledge bases, tracking health metrics, and automating family history documentation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47785766&quot; title=&quot;I still use it and find it helpful. My OpenClaw instance uses an Obsidian project as its memory. Mainly, it&amp;#39;s just my main day-to-day LLM that I access via WhatsApp, but instead of the memory being locked away with a specific vendor, it&amp;#39;s stored in version control that I can read and edit. That reason alone makes it compelling to me. When a better LLM comes along, I can just switch, and my memory and system prompts come with it. However, I also use it for calorie/weight/workout tracking, to-do…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47784422&quot; title=&quot;I have it installed on an extra macbook pro that I had available.  I&amp;#39;m really only using it at the moment for one use case: Nightly, I have OpenClaw pull the latest changes from a private GitHub repo that is my Obsidian notes vault.  It then looks to see which new notes have been added and then runs a &amp;#39;create flashcard&amp;#39; skill to extract and author useful flashcards for spaced-repetition practice.  I then gave it access to a custom web-based spaced-repetition flash card application that I built…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47787096&quot; title=&quot;I’ve also found it useful for personal stuff. For example I have my OpenClaw bot in a family group on Telegram and everyday it asks my family members stories from their lives that it meticulously documents and uses as a basis for further questions in the future and has so far managed to build a rich family history spanning 50 odd family members (a project I had always been planning to do for never found the time to).&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others dismiss it as &amp;#34;manufactured bot hype&amp;#34; driven by social media signaling rather than utility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47784711&quot; title=&quot;When I saw Jensen&amp;#39;s talk about how Openclaw surpassed React and Linux in terms of GitHub stars within a few months, I knew the whole thing was manufactured bot hype. No one can tell me a compelling use case. The whole thing seems designed around getting people to burn more tokens.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47785533&quot; title=&quot;The main function of OpenClaw was for people to signal how advanced and cutting edge and thought-leader-y they were. All those Mac minis are sitting idle now.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47784006&quot; title=&quot;I see a decent number of people on social media who won&amp;#39;t stop posting about how great it is and how much of a moron every person is for not using it. Oddly enough, rarely, if ever do they say what specific things they&amp;#39;re using it for and how it&amp;#39;s saving them time. I remain interested in it, however, I&amp;#39;ve still awaiting an actual use case that can&amp;#39;t be handled by some other tool/service that does it better/faster.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Practical adoption is frequently hindered by high token costs—sometimes exceeding $100 a month—and reliability issues where agents repeatedly fail to execute scheduled tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47785456&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t personally know many people who&amp;#39;ve used it so I&amp;#39;m not sure if this was a me thing but here was my experience in short: I set up OpenClaw on a raspberry pi 4 that I could ssh into using my main computer. My main goal for using OpenClaw was just as a morning debriefer that could scan my google calendar, trello board, and gmail to let me know what I had happening for the day and also weekly to give me a forecast for the weeks ahead to see how busy my month was. I spent about 40-50 bucks in…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47786109&quot; title=&quot;I used it very similarly to you, but found it to be about $3.50 per day, or $100 a month. It wasn&amp;#39;t worth that.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these frustrations, some proponents view the tool as a &amp;#34;Dropbox moment&amp;#34; that simplifies complex automation for non-technical users, potentially serving as a prototyping phase for more deterministic software &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47785776&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s a fair assessment if you look at LinkedIn posts. Personally though, I am finding it incredibly useful and I use it daily to assist with operations, strategy, sales.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47784732&quot; title=&quot;Could this be a bit of a Dropbox moment? What it adds is making this kind of thing easy for normies , even if it&amp;#39;s neither the best way to do things nor very difficult for hobbyists to do using existing tech. Maybe it&amp;#39;s the wrong approach, maybe what people really want is more deterministic software that they use agents to help write. But this kind of thing can maybe serve as a prototyping phase for that. Perhaps in the future, people&amp;#39;s assistants will offer to &amp;#39;solidify&amp;#39; frequently used…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cal.com/blog/cal-com-goes-closed-source-why&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cal.com is going closed source&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cal.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780456&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;390 points · 316 comments · by Benjamin_Dobell&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scheduling platform Cal.com is transitioning to a closed-source model to protect customer data from AI-driven security threats, though it will maintain a separate open-source version called Cal.diy for hobbyists and developers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cal.com/blog/cal-com-goes-closed-source-why&quot; title=&quot;Cal.com Goes Closed Source: Why AI Security Is Forcing Our Decision | Cal.com - Scheduling Software for Online Bookings    Cal.com goes closed source after 5 years. Here’s why rising AI-driven security risks and vulnerability discovery are forcing us to protect customer data.    Install App    Solutions    [Enterprise](../enterprise)[Cal.ai](../ai)    Developer    Resources    [Pricing](../pricing)    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cal.com’s decision to go closed source is framed by its leadership as a defense against AI-driven vulnerability discovery &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780567&quot; title=&quot;hey cofounder here. since it takes my 16 year old neighbors son 15 mins and $100 claude code credits to hack your open source project&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, though many commenters suspect the move is actually a business decision to prevent &amp;#34;copyright-washing&amp;#34; or to combat declining conversion rates for self-hosted users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47781042&quot; title=&quot;I have a feeling the real reason is them trying to avoid someone using AI to copyright-wash their product, they&amp;#39;re just using security as the excuse.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47784017&quot; title=&quot;An app like Cal.com can be vibe coded in a few evenings with a Chrome MCP server pointed to their website to figure out all the nooks and crannys. The moat of Cal.com is not the code, it&amp;#39;s the users who don&amp;#39;t want to migrate. The real answer is they are likely having a hard time converting people to paid plans&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780528&quot; title=&quot;This is a weird knee-jerk reaction. I feel like this is more a business decision than a security decision. I feel like with AI, self-hosting software reliably is becoming easier so the incentives to pay for a hosted service of an OSS project are going down.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that closing source code provides a necessary delay against automated attackers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47781023&quot; title=&quot;LLMs really are stunningly good at finding vulnerabilities in code, which is why, with closed-source code, you can and probably will use them to make your code as secure as possible. But you won&amp;#39;t keep the doors open for others to use them against it. So it is, unfortunately, understandable in a way...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780690&quot; title=&quot;You know what? Great move. Open-source supporters don&amp;#39;t have a sustainable answer to the fact that AI models can easily find N-day vulnerabilities extremely quickly and swamp maintainers with issues and bug-reports left hanging for days. Unfortunately, this is where it is going and the open-source software supporters did not for-see the downsides of open source maintenance in the age of AI especially for businesses with &amp;#39;open-core&amp;#39; products. Might as well close-source them to slow the attackers…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, critics contend this is a return to &amp;#34;security through obscurity&amp;#34; that ignores the benefits of shared auditing budgets in open-source ecosystems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780751&quot; title=&quot;Drew Breunig published a very relevant piece yesterday that came to the opposite conclusion: https://www.dbreunig.com/2026/04/14/cybersecurity-is-proof-o... Since security exploits can now be found by spending tokens, open source is MORE valuable because open source libraries can share that auditing budget while closed source software has to find all the exploits themselves in private. &amp;gt; If Mythos continues to find exploits so long as you keep throwing money at it, security is reduced to a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780541&quot; title=&quot;I get the mentality but it feels very much like security through obscurity. When did we decide that that was the correct model?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47781084&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not a security expert but can&amp;#39;t close source applications be vulnerable and exploited too? I feel like using close source as a defense is just giving you a false sense of security.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Others suggest that if LLMs are proficient at finding exploits, developers should simply integrate them into their own pre-release CI/CD pipelines to harden code before it goes public &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780646&quot; title=&quot;This seems kind of crazy. If LLMs are so stunningly good at finding vulnerabilities in code, then shouldn&amp;#39;t the solution be to run an LLM against your code after you commit, and before you release it? Then you basically have pentesting harnesses all to yourself before going public. If an LLM can&amp;#39;t find any flaws, then you are good to release that code. A few years ago, I invoked Linus&amp;#39;s Law in a classroom, and I was roundly debunked. Isn&amp;#39;t it a shame that it&amp;#39;s basically been fulfilled now with…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://wchambliss.wordpress.com/2026/03/03/god-sleeps-in-the-minerals/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;God sleeps in the minerals&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (wchambliss.wordpress.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47778475&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;565 points · 105 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A photographer shared a collection of snapshots featuring various mineral specimens from the &amp;#34;Unearthed: Raw Beauty&amp;#34; exhibition at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. &lt;a href=&quot;https://wchambliss.wordpress.com/2026/03/03/god-sleeps-in-the-minerals/&quot; title=&quot;Title: God sleeps in the minerals    URL Source: https://wchambliss.wordpress.com/2026/03/03/god-sleeps-in-the-minerals/    Published Time: 2026-03-04T03:47:55+00:00    Markdown Content:  # God sleeps in the minerals | Chamblissian    # [Chamblissian](https://wchambliss.wordpress.com/)    A public notebook.    * * *    « [The Green Chapel](https://wchambliss.wordpress.com/2026/01/27/the-green-chapel/)    [Blow wind, blow](https://wchambliss.wordpress.com/2026/04/05/blow-wind-blow/) »    ## God sleeps in the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are captivated by the &amp;#34;mathematical perfection&amp;#34; of mineral formations, particularly the striking geometry of cubes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47779101&quot; title=&quot;The Cubes are the most captivating to me. Organic mishmash of polyhedra and assorted blobs is one thing, but perfect cubes is uniquely striking.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47779296&quot; title=&quot;Pyrite or fool&amp;#39;s gold, lovely mathematical perfection and a great etymology to match!&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some find the poetic title evocative, others criticize the religious association, arguing that these specimens are simply the result of physics and time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47778851&quot; title=&quot;I didnt like the title. Even if the pictures are nice.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47779144&quot; title=&quot;Imagine associating god with some minerals.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780302&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s fine as a poetic term. But no god is required. Just time, pressure and the laws of physics.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights the accessibility of the hobby, ranging from the satisfaction of joining local mineral clubs to the frustration that museum-quality &amp;#34;treasure&amp;#34; is often restricted to private mines or commercial operations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47779452&quot; title=&quot;These types of huge perfect specimens always take my breath away when I am able to see them in person. To think that this kind of stuff just kinda exists buried in the earth... I am a part of a local mineral club which hosts several &amp;#39;field trips&amp;#39; a year to various mineralogically interesting locations (most of which aren&amp;#39;t accessible as an individual, like private land and special digs at active mining/quarrying sites on their days off). I have never found anything even remotely as beautiful as…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47781150&quot; title=&quot;That’s what really sucks about rockhounding as a hobby. In the US we have a blessing of public BLM lands where we can collect, especially in the West, but most of the interesting specimens in museums and fancy collections come from mines or some unique geological occurrence on private land. Getting them requires dropping lots of money or getting into commercial mining. The best most of us can really hope for is some small piece from tailings. There are a few species you can sometimes find in…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47782300&quot; title=&quot;For us nerds in the Portland/PNW area, the Rice Museum out in Hillsboro—despite a name suggesting it has an exhaustive display of rice varieties—has a terrific collection of large and unique mineral specimens. https://www.ricenorthwestmuseum.org&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, users noted the irony of dangerous materials like asbestos and mercury being beautiful, naturally occurring minerals found in the wild &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780710&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been to a few mineral museums like this and one of the interesting ones you can come across is Asbestos. Just hanging out there on display right next to some other mineral. It forms beautiful formations just like the rest, but I&amp;#39;ve heard so many mesothelioma lawyer commercials that it&amp;#39;s easy to forget it&amp;#39;s a completely natural material. Also one you can pick apart like cotton and weave into a fabric - it&amp;#39;s a flexible material, made out of a rock, which can kill you. The asbestos formations…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47782058&quot; title=&quot;Central California has several abandoned asbestos mines which continue to release asbestos into the nearby air and water. I remember considering some hiking around the area once and then came across the warnings regarding exposure. CA also has a lot of naturally occuring mercury as well. I seem to remember that some lakes in CA are so high in natural(i.e. not from gold mining) mercury that you shouldn&amp;#39;t eat the fish.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://prog21.dadgum.com/30.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Want to write a compiler? Just read these two papers (2008)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (prog21.dadgum.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47776796&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;508 points · 158 comments · by downbad_&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that traditional textbooks overcomplicate compiler design and recommends Jack Crenshaw’s &amp;#34;Let’s Build a Compiler!&amp;#34; and the &amp;#34;Nanopass Framework&amp;#34; paper as more accessible resources for learning to build functional compilers through simple, incremental transformations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://prog21.dadgum.com/30.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Want to Write a Compiler? Just Read These Two Papers.    URL Source: https://prog21.dadgum.com/30.html    Published Time: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 02:50:03 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Want to Write a Compiler? Just Read These Two Papers.    [programming in the twenty-first century](https://prog21.dadgum.com/)  It&amp;#39;s not about technology for its own sake. It&amp;#39;s about being able to implement your ideas.    # Want to Write a Compiler? Just Read These Two Papers.    Imagine you don&amp;#39;t know _anything_ about…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the best entry points for compiler development, with significant debate over the &amp;#34;Dragon Book.&amp;#34; While some praise its foundational Chapter 2 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47777269&quot; title=&quot;*Donald Knute -&amp;gt; Donald Ervin Knuth is the author of the book &amp;#39;The Art of Computer Programming&amp;#39; (in progress for a couple of decades, currently volume 4c is being written). It is quite advanced, and it will likely not cover compilers anymore (Addison-Wesley had commissioned a compiler book from Knuth when he was a doctoral candidate, now he is retired and has stated his goal for the series has changed). I disagree with the author&amp;#39;s point: the &amp;#39;Dragon book&amp;#39;&amp;#39;s (&amp;#39;Compilers: Principles, Techniques,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47778717&quot; title=&quot;The &amp;#39;Dragon Book&amp;#39; is big on parsing but I wouldn&amp;#39;t recommend it if you want to make many optimisation passes or a back-end. The first edition was my first CS textbook, back in the &amp;#39;90s and as a young programmer I learned a lot from it.  A couple years ago, I started on a modern compiler back-end however, and found that I needed to update my knowledge with quite a lot. The 2nd ed covers data-flow analysis, which is very important.  However, modern compilers (GCC, LLVM, Cranelift, ...) are built…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue it is a &amp;#34;terrible starting place&amp;#34; due to its heavy focus on theory and outdated coverage of modern techniques like Static Single Assignment (SSA) &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47778611&quot; title=&quot;The dragon book almost convinced me never to try to write a compiler.  I don&amp;#39;t know why people recommend it.  I guess you&amp;#39;re a lot smarter than I am. There are some excellent books out there.  In its own way, the dragon book is excellent, but it is a terrible starting place. Here are a bunch of references from the same vintage as OP.  I recommend starting with a book that actually walks through the process of building a compiler and doesn&amp;#39;t spend its time exclusively with theory.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47778717&quot; title=&quot;The &amp;#39;Dragon Book&amp;#39; is big on parsing but I wouldn&amp;#39;t recommend it if you want to make many optimisation passes or a back-end. The first edition was my first CS textbook, back in the &amp;#39;90s and as a young programmer I learned a lot from it.  A couple years ago, I started on a modern compiler back-end however, and found that I needed to update my knowledge with quite a lot. The 2nd ed covers data-flow analysis, which is very important.  However, modern compilers (GCC, LLVM, Cranelift, ...) are built…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;**Consensus and Recommendations**
*   **Alternative Literature:** There is strong support for more practical, accessible texts. Niklaus Wirth’s *Compilers* is lauded for its brevity and clarity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47777269&quot; title=&quot;*Donald Knute -&amp;gt; Donald Ervin Knuth is the author of the book &amp;#39;The Art of Computer Programming&amp;#39; (in progress for a couple of decades, currently volume 4c is being written). It is quite advanced, and it will likely not cover compilers anymore (Addison-Wesley had commissioned a compiler book from Knuth when he was a doctoral candidate, now he is retired and has stated his goal for the series has changed). I disagree with the author&amp;#39;s point: the &amp;#39;Dragon book&amp;#39;&amp;#39;s (&amp;#39;Compilers: Principles, Techniques,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, and *Crafting Interpreters* is frequently recommended for modern learners, though users wish it covered advanced topics like linking and optimization &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47777040&quot; title=&quot;Nowadays I’ve heard recommended Crafting Interpreters. ( https://craftinginterpreters.com ) The Nanopass paper link doesn’t work.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47778202&quot; title=&quot;Crafting Interpreters is great, I wish it had a companion book that covered: - types and typing    - optimization passes    - object files, executables, libraries and linking Then two of them would be sufficient for writing a compiler.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.
*   **Complexity:** Participants agree that building a compiler is one of the most difficult yet rewarding challenges in computer science &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47776862&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s been about 4 years since I took a compilers course (from OMSCS, graduate program) and still shutter ... it was, hands down, the most difficult (yet rewarding) classes I&amp;#39;ve taken.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;**Disag&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://super-memory.com/articles/sleep.htm&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Good sleep, good learning, good life (2012)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (super-memory.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47776557&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;440 points · 220 comments · by downbad_&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dr. Piotr Wozniak explores the vital connection between sleep, memory, and learning, advocating for &amp;#34;free running&amp;#34; and biphasic sleep schedules to maximize cognitive performance while warning against the use of alarm clocks, sleeping pills, and other substances that disrupt natural circadian rhythms. &lt;a href=&quot;https://super-memory.com/articles/sleep.htm&quot; title=&quot;Title: Good sleep, good learning, good life    URL Source: https://super-memory.com/articles/sleep.htm    Published Time: Sun, 01 Jul 2018 18:01:12 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Good sleep, good learning, good life    # Good sleep, good learning, good life    ### [Dr Piotr Wozniak](https://super-memory.com/english/company/wozniak.htm), May 2012 (updated Oct 21, 2017)    I have for years been interested in sleep research due to my professional involvement in memory and learning. This article attempts to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights how sleep quality is deeply intertwined with mental stability and life purpose, with some arguing that a clear &amp;#34;path&amp;#34; in life naturally leads to better self-care and rest &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47778941&quot; title=&quot;I think a lot of it has to do with mental status, which can be concluded with one sentence -- &amp;#39;Are you happy with your life, and if not do you have a clear path to reach that?&amp;#39;. People who say no probably has a lot of trouble to get fit, get enough sleep -- sometimes NOT because they do not have the resources, but because they are not happy. They hate life, so why makes it better? I have observed this in myself so I wonder whether it is universally true. I have observed that whenever I have a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While parents and those with medical conditions like diabetes describe sleep deprivation as an unavoidable &amp;#34;curse&amp;#34; or a &amp;#34;bug in the universe&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47777299&quot; title=&quot;How can I explain to my 6 months old girl that we all need to sleep :D This is a bug in the universe! We need to sleep so that the levels of dopamine, and hormones of hunger and not hunger are at good levels, so that we can be healthy and strong, so that the immune system is stable and strong... And we need to get good sleep so that we can protect our children and be sane.... BUT the nature decided that the kids will wake up 3-4 times per night, and you need to wake up and take care of them.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47777128&quot; title=&quot;I am recently diagnosed with Type II Diabetes. The classic symptoms were unknown to me until this point when I researched them. I had previously blamed psych medications for the symptoms, and while they may have exacerbated them, I guess diabetes was the real root cause. One of the symptoms is frequent urination. And so, every night I wake up every 2 hours or so and crawl into the bathroom. It’s legitimately a huge curse. I don’t get enough deep R.E.M. and I remain exhausted just from the…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest that communal support or specific sleep training can mitigate these challenges &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47777481&quot; title=&quot;In my area there is a saying like &amp;#39;it takes a village to raise a child&amp;#39;.  i believe that a good social network is not only important for the kid, but for the parents too.  it helps so much to have a partner, grandparents, aunts/uncles, who can look over the kid just for a hour or 2, so you can get your rest. And its usually fun for the kids too.  Now that i have 2 kids, a loving wife and 2 families around me, i have the highest respect for all the single moms/dads out there.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47778770&quot; title=&quot;FWIW, and understanding that individual babies do differ, most babies can sleep through the night (10-12 hours) by 3-4 months old. Check out the books &amp;#39;Twelve Hours&amp;#39; Sleep by Twelve Weeks Old&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;Precious Little Sleep&amp;#39; for guidance. In my case where n=2, naps during the day are/were not all that consistent but at night (unless they are very sick or something) the kids sleep .&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant disagreement regarding individual needs, as some users report high performance on minimal sleep &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47782627&quot; title=&quot;I got 4h of sleep last night which is about my normal average at this time of the year, and I have 0 regrets about it. I also don&amp;#39;t sleep at a regular time every day. If I have no other obligations, I naturally let it shift forward (what the article calls &amp;#39;delayed sleep phase&amp;#39;). I am most unhappy when I HAVE TO use an alarm clock and break my own patterns. Last night, I naturally went to sleep right before sunrise and I woke up 4 hours later. To pre-empt a few objections: I did not need an…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, while others note that aging increases sensitivity to sleep disruptions caused by even moderate alcohol consumption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47777013&quot; title=&quot;The older I get the more sensitive to a single poor night&amp;#39;s sleep I become. The most frustrating effect is that even a few drinks in the evening (maybe over 2-3 units). Unsettles my sleep that if I&amp;#39;m in the process of learning something feels like it sets me back several days. That&amp;#39;s not even counting the slowed processing I feel, and lower productivity the next day. I genuinely have to revisit old information. A genuine hangover from a heavy night can put me out of action for half a week! When…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47777192&quot; title=&quot;Mentioning drinking three times (effects of drinks in the evening, hangover, effects on learning) in a single response might give an impression you like to drink.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dbpro.app/blog/do-you-even-need-a-database&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Do you even need a database?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (dbpro.app)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47778086&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;308 points · 297 comments · by upmostly&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A benchmark study reveals that simple flat-file storage strategies, such as in-memory maps and binary searches, can outperform traditional databases like SQLite for basic ID lookups, suggesting that many early-stage applications may not actually require a formal database until they reach significant scale or complexity. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dbpro.app/blog/do-you-even-need-a-database&quot; title=&quot;Title: Do You Even Need a Database?    URL Source: https://www.dbpro.app/blog/do-you-even-need-a-database    Published Time: 2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  # Do You Even Need a Database? - DB Pro Blog    [Limited Time Offer: Sale: Use code save50 for 50% off](https://www.dbpro.app/#pricing)    [![Image 1: Logo](https://www.dbpro.app/_next/image?url=%2Ficon.webp&amp;amp;w=256&amp;amp;q=75) DB Pro](https://www.dbpro.app/)    *   Product  *   [Pricing](https://www.dbpro.app/pricing)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether developers should bypass traditional databases in favor of simple file-based storage or SQLite, with some arguing that modern NVMe speeds and OS page caching make raw files sufficient for early-stage products &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47778257&quot; title=&quot;people wildly underestimate the os page cache and modern nvme drives tbh. disk io today is basically ram speeds from 10 years ago. seeing startups spin up managed postgres + redis clusters + prisma on day 1 just to collect waitlist emails is peak feature vomit. a jsonl file and a single go binary will literally outlive most startup runways. also, the irony of a database gui company writing a post about how you dont actually need a database is pretty based.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47778568&quot; title=&quot;The irony isn’t lost on us, trust me. We spent a while debating whether to even publish this one. But yeah, the page cache point is real and massively underappreciated. Modern infrastructure discourse skips past it almost entirely. A warm NVMe-backed file with the OS doing the caching is genuinely fast enough for most early-stage products.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. However, many warn that avoiding a relational database often leads to &amp;#34;feature vomit&amp;#34; or the low-quality reinvention of database internals like atomicity and indexing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47778855&quot; title=&quot;At some point, don&amp;#39;t you just end up making a low-quality, poorly-tested reinvention of SQLite by doing this and adding features?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47781082&quot; title=&quot;You need databases if you need any kind of atomicity. Doing atomic writes is extremely fragile if you are just on top of the filesystem. This is also why many databases have persistence issues and can easily corrupt on-disk data on crash. Rocksdb on windows is a very simple example a couple years back. It was regularly having corruption issues when doing development with it.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47779044&quot; title=&quot;but it&amp;#39;s so trivial to implement SQLite, in almost any app or language...there are sufficient ORMs to do the joins if you don&amp;#39;t like working with SQL directly...the B-trees are built in and you don&amp;#39;t need to reason about binary search, and your app doesn&amp;#39;t have 300% test coverage with fuzzing like SQLite does you should be squashing bugs related to your business logic, not core data storage. Local data storage on your one horizontally-scaling box is a solved problem using SQLite. Not to mention…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While there is debate over whether NoSQL is better for unpredictable startup needs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47779378&quot; title=&quot;This always confuses me because we have decades of SQL and all its issues as well. Hundreds of experienced devs talking about all the issues in SQL and the quirks of queries when your data is not trivial. One would think that for a startup of sorts, where things changes fast and are unpredictable, NoSQL is the correct answer. And when things are stable and the shape of entities are known, going for SQL becomes a natural path. There is also cases for having both, and there is cases for…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that NoSQL actually compounds technical debt by trading manageable migrations for &amp;#34;insurmountable&amp;#34; data inconsistency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47778942&quot; title=&quot;Sometimes yes, I&amp;#39;ve seen it.  It even tends to happen on NoSQL databases as well.  Three times I&amp;#39;ve seen apps start on top of Dynamo DB, and then end up re-implementing relational databases at the application level anyway.  Starting with postgres would have been the right answer for all three of those.  Initial dev went faster, but tech debt and complexity quickly started soaking up all those gains and left a hard-to-maintain mess.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47781295&quot; title=&quot;No, when things change fast and unpredictably, NoSQL is worse than when they are well-known and stable. NoSQL gains you no speed at all in redesigning your system. Instead, you trade a few hard to do tasks in data migration into an unsurmountable mess of data inconsistency bugs that you&amp;#39;ll never actually get into the end of. &amp;gt; is mostly bad design decisions and poor domain knowledge Yes, using NoSQL to avoid data migrations is a bad design decision. Usually created by poor general knowledge.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Alternative suggestions include using SQLite to avoid reinventing the wheel &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47779044&quot; title=&quot;but it&amp;#39;s so trivial to implement SQLite, in almost any app or language...there are sufficient ORMs to do the joins if you don&amp;#39;t like working with SQL directly...the B-trees are built in and you don&amp;#39;t need to reason about binary search, and your app doesn&amp;#39;t have 300% test coverage with fuzzing like SQLite does you should be squashing bugs related to your business logic, not core data storage. Local data storage on your one horizontally-scaling box is a solved problem using SQLite. Not to mention…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt; or leveraging advanced features in enterprise databases like Oracle to bridge the gap between JSON flexibility and relational stability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47781266&quot; title=&quot;Disclaimer: I work part time on the DB team. You could also consider renting an Oracle DB. Yep! Consider some unintuitive facts: • It can be cheaper to use Oracle than MongoDB. There are companies that have migrated away from Mongo to Oracle to save money. This idea violates some of HN&amp;#39;s most sacred memes, but there you go. Cloud databases are things you always pay for, even if they&amp;#39;re based on open source code. • Oracle supports NoSQL features including the MongoDB protocol. You can use the…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.strix.ai/blog/cal-com-is-closing-its-code-due-to-ai-threats&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Open Source Isn&amp;#39;t Dead&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (strix.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780712&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;356 points · 186 comments · by bearsyankees&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Cal.com is transitioning to a closed-source model to prevent AI-automated vulnerability exploitation, security firm Strix argues that &amp;#34;security through obscurity&amp;#34; is ineffective against modern AI agents and advocates for integrating autonomous AI defenders directly into the development lifecycle. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.strix.ai/blog/cal-com-is-closing-its-code-due-to-ai-threats&quot; title=&quot;Title: Open Source Isn&amp;#39;t Dead.    URL Source: https://www.strix.ai/blog/cal-com-is-closing-its-code-due-to-ai-threats    Published Time: 2026-04-15T09:00:00-07:00    Markdown Content:  Today, [Cal.com announced](https://x.com/pumfleet/status/2044406553508274554) they are transitioning their core codebase away from open source. The reasoning provided by their CEO, Bailey Pumfleet, is that AI has automated vulnerability discovery at scale, making code scanning and exploitation &amp;#39;near zero-cost&amp;#39;. In this…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The shift toward closed-source models is increasingly framed as a response to AI-driven security risks, though many argue this is a convenient excuse for the underlying difficulty of monetizing open-source software &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47781234&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The reasoning provided by their CEO, Bailey Pumfleet, is that AI has automated vulnerability discovery at scale, That sounds like an excuse. The real reason is probably that it&amp;#39;s hard to make a viable business out of developing open source.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47781989&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t follow. It seems obvious that there&amp;#39;s more to gain for attackers using AI agents to exploit open source repositories, than there is for good samaritan defenders. In this new closed-source world (for Cal.com), there&amp;#39;s nothing stopping them from running their own internal security agent audits, all whilst at least blocking the easiest method of finding zero-days - that is, being open source. This really just seems like Strix marketing. Which is totally fair, but let&amp;#39;s be reasonable here,…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some maintain that open source benefits from a wider net of voluntary security reports &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47781248&quot; title=&quot;I have an open source project and started receiving a lot of security vulnerability reports in the last few months. A lot of them are extremely corner cases, but there were some legit ones. They&amp;#39;re all fixed now. Closed source software won&amp;#39;t receive any reports, but it will be exploited with AI. So I definitely agree with the message of this article.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that closed-source companies can simply run the same AI scanners internally without exposing their vulnerabilities to the public &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47782904&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;  Closed source software won&amp;#39;t receive any reports, but it will be exploited with AI. What makes you so sure that closed-source companies won&amp;#39;t run those same AI scanners on their own code? It&amp;#39;s closed to the public, it&amp;#39;s not closed to them!&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47783008&quot; title=&quot;Came here to say the same. Same tools + private. In security two different defense-mechanisms are always better than one.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, there is a growing consensus that financial incentives and &amp;#34;human fatigue&amp;#34; are driving developers toward private repositories to prevent AI from &amp;#34;slurping&amp;#34; their innovations without compensation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47781465&quot; title=&quot;All content is going to go behind paywalls. There is zero incentive or reason for content creators to let AI slurp their content for free and distribute it and get all the money from it. Everything new will be licensed and if AI companies want access to it, they will need to pay for it, just like we will.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47781763&quot; title=&quot;I decided to not open source my latest project but it has nothing to do with security concerns. My code is perfectly secure and bug-free. My concern is mostly financial. Most people would be in a better position to monetize my software than I am... Using AI to obfuscate the origin while appropriating all the key innovations. I wouldn&amp;#39;t get any credit. Also, I&amp;#39;m not really interested in humans anymore. I have human fatigue.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://chatgpt.com/apps/spreadsheets/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ChatGPT for Excel&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (chatgpt.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47785397&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;336 points · 198 comments · by armcat&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI has launched a ChatGPT add-in for Excel that allows users to build, update, and analyze spreadsheets using plain-language prompts directly within the application. &lt;a href=&quot;https://chatgpt.com/apps/spreadsheets/&quot; title=&quot;Title: ChatGPT for Excel | Build and update spreadsheets with ChatGPT    URL Source: https://chatgpt.com/apps/spreadsheets/    Markdown Content:  # ChatGPT for Excel | Build and update spreadsheets with ChatGPT    [](https://chatgpt.com/)    *   [About](https://chatgpt.com/overview/)  *     Features        *   [Agent](https://chatgpt.com/features/agent/)      *   [Apps](https://chatgpt.com/features/apps/)      *   [Atlas](https://chatgpt.com/atlas/)      *   [Codex](https://chatgpt.com/codex/)      *   [Deep…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users report that native AI integrations like Microsoft Copilot and Google Gemini are currently underperforming, often failing to read basic cell data or providing &amp;#34;useless&amp;#34; side-panel interfaces &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47786185&quot; title=&quot;This looks bad for Microsoft. They added a Copilot button to all their products but it doesn&amp;#39;t do much more than open a chat side panel. I recently tried Claude Cowork for PowerPoint and I was stunned by the content as well as design quality of the deck it produced. That&amp;#39;s a threat for Microsoft because now you don&amp;#39;t need the editing tools of PowerPoint, AI replaces it, so all you need is the presentation mode of PowerPoint. Copilot for Excel is useless. Ask it what is in cell A1 and it can&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47788461&quot; title=&quot;I’ve always found it unbelievable how bad Gemini’s Google Sheets interaction is. Copying the sheets into Claude and then modifying them there and copying them back actually outperforms it. Nowadays I just make single-purpose websites with Claude Code because Google Sheets has such poor AI integration and is outrageously tedious to edit. They had all the parts and I have a subscription and it still does terrible things like prompt me to use pandas after exporting as a CSV. It will mention some…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue these tools are &amp;#34;dead on arrival&amp;#34; for high-level finance professionals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47786498&quot; title=&quot;As someone that knows a high-flying portfolio manager who works at a very well known firm that I wont name... I can confidently state these tools are DOA. Ive spoken to them at length about the nature of what these people actually do day-to-day. If you think its just about using excel then you&amp;#39;re already way off. They (OAI+Anthropic) very much do not get exactly what these people are doing in the job (accounting+corporate finance+valuation+asset management) and what the actual production…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others find that using Claude for complex spreadsheet refactoring is already a &amp;#34;game changer&amp;#34; despite high token costs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47786816&quot; title=&quot;Claude for excel is already amazing. Fully capable of doing junior work. Formatting is great. Can refactor large multi-tab spreadsheets. It just burns tokens. If OpenAI is going to subsidize this on the monthly enterprise plans for a while then it&amp;#39;s a game changer. Claude for Excel (I work in finance) was one of the absolutely critical reasons we added Anthropic enterprise licenses. But they&amp;#39;ve turned out to be quite expensive ($100/day for heavy users). We&amp;#39;ll see what OpenAI&amp;#39;s quotas are.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Microsoft’s Excel team lead maintains that recent updates now provide models with full access to Excel&amp;#39;s capabilities, allowing for iterative analysis and multi-tab modeling &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47794172&quot; title=&quot;I run the Excel team at Microsoft. The experience you&amp;#39;re describing sounds like it&amp;#39;s from the earlier versions of Copilot in Excel that were genuinely limited. Today, Excel Copilot takes a model-forward approach where we give the models full access to Excel&amp;#39;s capabilities. We give customers the choice of the latest models from both OpenAI and Anthropic, and we encourage the models to iteratively explore the spreadsheet before taking action. It builds a full understanding of the semantics and…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Concerns remain regarding the security of sharing sensitive workbook data with third-party AI providers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47786745&quot; title=&quot;In principle, I find it valuable to integrate tools. However, in this case I would be somewhat cautious, especially as &amp;#39;your chats, attachments, and workbook content — may be shared with OpenAI&amp;#39; (as per the Microsoft Marketplace description: https://marketplace.microsoft.com/en-us/product/WA200010215?... ). This seems like a security nightmare, which is especially relevant because sensitive data is often stored in Excel files.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt; and the technical latency of executing &amp;#34;Object Model&amp;#34; calls within web-based add-ins &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47786461&quot; title=&quot;Oh wow, I used to work on Excel Add-Ins about 10 years ago. Even got a patent for it. I&amp;#39;d be curious to see how they implemented the calls. We came up with what I still consider a pretty cool batch-rpc mechanism under the hood so that you wouldn&amp;#39;t have to cross the process boundary on every OM calls (which is especially costly on Excel Web). I remember fighting so hard to have it be called `context.sync()` instead of `context.executeAsync()`... That being said, done poorly it can be slow as the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47786669&quot; title=&quot;I worked on the Excel Add-Ins platform at Microsoft, yes. By OM call I mean &amp;#39;Object Model&amp;#39; call, basically interacting with the Excel document. The reason those calls are expensive on Excel Web is that you&amp;#39;re running your add-in in the browser, so every `.sync()` call has to go all the way to the server and back in order to see any changes. If you&amp;#39;re doing those calls in a loop, you&amp;#39;re looking at 500ms to 2-3s latency for every call (that was back then, it might be better now). On the desktop…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_O._Rabin&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Michael Rabin has died&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (en.wikipedia.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47782925&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;412 points · 86 comments · by tkhattra&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Michael Oser Rabin, a pioneering Israeli computer scientist and 1976 Turing Award co-recipient known for his foundational work in computational complexity, cryptography, and randomized algorithms, died on April 14, 2026, at the age of 94. &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_O._Rabin&quot; title=&quot;Title: Michael O. Rabin    URL Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_O._Rabin    Published Time: 2003-08-17T13:53:01Z    Markdown Content:  # Michael O. Rabin - Wikipedia  [Jump to content](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_O._Rabin#bodyContent)    - [x] Main menu     Main menu    move to sidebar hide     Navigation     *   [Main page](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page &amp;#39;Visit the main page [z]&amp;#39;)  *   [Contents](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contents &amp;#39;Guides to browsing Wikipedia&amp;#39;)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion surrounding Michael Rabin’s passing is heavily focused on his foundational contributions to cryptography, with some users arguing his work on public-key cryptography and one-way hash functions was more essential than the better-known RSA algorithm &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814561&quot; title=&quot;Michael O. Rabin had important contributions in many domains, but from a practical point of view the most important are his contributions to cryptography. After Ralph Merkle, Whitfield Diffie and Martin Hellman, Michael O. Rabin is the most important of the creators of public-key cryptography. The RSA team (Ron Rivest, Adi Shamir and Leonard Adleman) is better known than Michael O. Rabin, but that is entirely due to marketing and advertising, because they founded a successful business. In…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters highlight specific technical achievements like Rabin Fingerprinting for data deduplication and his &amp;#34;old-school&amp;#34; mastery as a lecturer &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815482&quot; title=&quot;Thank you Michael Rabin for your excellent work. Rest in Peace. Rabin Fingerprinting is one of my favorites of his contributions. It&amp;#39;s a &amp;#39;rolling hash&amp;#39; that allows you to quickly compute a 32-bit (or larger) hash at *every* byte offset of a file. It is used most notably to do file block matching/deduplication when those matching blocks can be at any offset. It&amp;#39;s tragically underappreciated. I&amp;#39;ve been meaning to write up a tutorial as part of my Galois Field series. Someday.. Thank you again!&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814812&quot; title=&quot;I took his Introduction to Cryptography class when he was a visiting professor at Columbia. Absolute master of an old-school chalkboard lecturer. They don&amp;#39;t make them like that any more.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. However, a significant portion of the thread is dedicated to addressing a &amp;#34;disgraceful&amp;#34; wave of antisemitic vandalism on his biography page immediately following his death &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815226&quot; title=&quot;First sentence starts with horrible antisemitism. Can someone fix it? (on my phone with kids so not in a position to)&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815429&quot; title=&quot;People keep adding different slurs. Awful and disgraceful.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815678&quot; title=&quot;Anti-Jew rhetoric is at a level unseen since WW2. It’s the new normal. It’s horrible.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, some noted the historical curiosity that Rabin was once a student of Elisha Netanyahu &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815601&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;As a young boy, he was very interested in mathematics and his father sent him to the best high school in Haifa, where he studied under mathematician Elisha Netanyahu, who was then a high school teacher.&amp;#39; Interesting. Some people are lucky enough to find their vocation quite early in life.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815688&quot; title=&quot;Wow hadn&amp;#39;t heard of him https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elisha_Netanyahu&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.gizmoweek.com/gemma-4-runs-iphone/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Google Gemma 4 Runs Natively on iPhone with Full Offline AI Inference&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (gizmoweek.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47774971&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;299 points · 187 comments · by takumi123&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.gizmoweek.com/gemma-4-runs-iphone/&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users suspect the article was written by an LLM due to repetitive phrasing and high scores on AI detection tools, though some argue such detectors are fundamentally unreliable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47777981&quot; title=&quot;Is it me, or does the article sound like LLM output? The pattern &amp;#39;It&amp;#39;s not mere X — it&amp;#39;s Y&amp;#39;, occurs like 4 times in the text :v&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47777990&quot; title=&quot;You would be correct. Ran the article through GPTZero, 100% AI.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47778171&quot; title=&quot;AI detectors that use text as a basis are not real. It is fundamentally impossible for them to exist.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While the technical feat is noted, critics argue that routing inference through the GPU instead of Apple’s Neural Engine makes it a battery-draining &amp;#34;tech demo&amp;#34; rather than a practical tool &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780473&quot; title=&quot;I noticed the inference is routed through the gpu rather than the Apple neural engine. Google’s engineers likely gave up on trying to compile custom attention kernels for Apple’s proprietary tensor blocks iirc. While Metal is predictable and easy to port to, it drains the battery way faster than a dedicated NPU. Until they rewrite the backend for the ANE, this is just a flashy tech demo rather than a production-ready tool&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, with others questioning if local models on consumer hardware are even coherent enough to be useful &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47776973&quot; title=&quot;Is the output coherent though? I am yet to see a local model working on consumer grade hardware being actually useful.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, developers report &amp;#34;hitting a brick wall&amp;#34; with App Store rejections when trying to ship local LLMs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47777198&quot; title=&quot;Unfortunately Apple appears to be blocking the use of these llms within apps on their app store.  I&amp;#39;ve been trying to ship an app that contains local llms and have hit a brick wall with issue 2.5.2&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, leading to speculation that Apple may be blocking these apps to protect their business model from a &amp;#34;SaaSpocolypse&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47777630&quot; title=&quot;I think Apple will become increasingly draconian about LLMs. Very soon people won&amp;#39;t need to buy many of their apps. They can just make them. This threatens Apple&amp;#39;s entire business model.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47777765&quot; title=&quot;Can&amp;#39;t be just a SaaSpocolypse. LLMs with the right harness could obliterate much of the TODO+ apps with a general assistant. But it&amp;#39;s more likely it&amp;#39;s just walled garden + security theatre that&amp;#39;ll keep them from allowing outside apps.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, despite some existing apps successfully bypassing these restrictions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47777622&quot; title=&quot;Though of course Apple&amp;#39;s rules aren&amp;#39;t always consistent, I have 2 separate apps currently on my phone that can/are running this (Google&amp;#39;s Edge Gallery and Locally AI)&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theverge.com/streaming/912898/youtube-shorts-feed-limit-zero-minutes&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;YouTube users get option to set their Shorts time limit to zero minutes&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theverge.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47786791&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;319 points · 159 comments · by pentagrama&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;YouTube is rolling out a new &amp;#34;time management&amp;#34; setting that allows all users to set a zero-minute limit on Shorts, effectively removing the feed from the home screen and app tabs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theverge.com/streaming/912898/youtube-shorts-feed-limit-zero-minutes&quot; title=&quot;Title: YouTube now lets you turn off Shorts    URL Source: https://www.theverge.com/streaming/912898/youtube-shorts-feed-limit-zero-minutes    Published Time: 2026-04-15T22:18:36+00:00    Markdown Content:  # YouTube now lets you turn off Shorts | The Verge    [Skip to main content](https://www.theverge.com/streaming/912898/youtube-shorts-feed-limit-zero-minutes#content)    [The…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new &amp;#34;zero-minute&amp;#34; limit for YouTube Shorts is criticized as a misleading tool that merely prevents swiping between videos rather than removing Shorts from the homepage or user interface &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47787118&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;YouTube now lets you turn off Shorts No it doesn&amp;#39;t. If you were hoping it would mean you don&amp;#39;t see shorts when you visit the Youtube home page, that&amp;#39;s not what this is. I just tried the thing mentioned in the article-- set my Shorts time limit to 0 minutes. What it does is make it so if you click a short from somewhere the short plays, but then if you try to swipe to the next one it hits you with the &amp;#39;You reached your short limit&amp;#39;. If you then return to the home page you still see Shorts.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47787178&quot; title=&quot;Damn, yeah that&amp;#39;s what I was hoping for. Honestly, the only thing really keeping me from watching shorts is the perplexing UX decision to not show the channel name as part of the preview tile. As basic Internet hygiene it just feels real bad to click on a video without the tiniest bit of idea about its provenance. For that reason I never do and have always just wanted to hide Shorts altogether.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters argue this &amp;#34;self-regulation&amp;#34; approach shifts the burden of addiction onto the user while YouTube continues to employ aggressive design hooks to harvest attention for advertisers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47787163&quot; title=&quot;Classic &amp;#39;self regulation&amp;#39; of an addictive product. &amp;#39;You look like you might have a problem with self-control, here are tools for managing yourself better&amp;#39; while admitting no fault and continuing with all of the hooks and barbs, design and advertising built to addict as many people as possible.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47788615&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not a product where you are the user.  Your attention is the product being sold to advertisers and the videos are a harvesting/production mechanism. It is not in the interests of either YT or the advertisers to allow you to opt out of features that are proven to be lucrative for eyeballs.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47787871&quot; title=&quot;Technically I think it&amp;#39;s for parents to regulate their kids.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. To bypass these limitations, users recommend third-party tools like uBlock Origin, UnTrap, and DeArrow to effectively hide Shorts and eliminate clickbait &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47787231&quot; title=&quot;Just use uBlock origin and this filter: https://github.com/i5heu/ublock-hide-yt-shorts&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47787337&quot; title=&quot;Before I quit YouTube, this was my setup. Brave Shields[1] - Adblock SponsorBlock[2] - Crowd-sourced skip sponsored segments DeArrow[3] - Make thumbnails not clickbait UnTrap[4] - Remove shorts and make UI amazing. Return Youtube Dislike[5] I deleted my Google account and now occasionally use Invidious with LibRedirect[6] to watch YT videos. Importing subscriptions into Invidious was a helpful stepping stone. [1] https://brave.com [2] https://sponsor.ajay.app [3] https://dearrow.ajay.app [4]…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://claudestatus.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Elevated errors on Claude.ai, API, Claude Code&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (claudestatus.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47779730&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;242 points · 217 comments · by redm&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic has resolved a major service disruption that caused elevated error rates and login failures across Claude.ai, the Claude API, and Claude Code. &lt;a href=&quot;https://claudestatus.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Is Claude Down? | Claude Status - Real-Time Outage &amp;amp; Uptime Monitor    URL Source: https://claudestatus.com/    Markdown Content:  Refreshed: 04:18:39 UTC    ## Component Status    Operational Degraded Outage    ### Global Latency    17 regions · avg 132ms    Updated 46s ago    ### Historical Events    #### April 15, 2026    14:53 UTC Resolved    Elevated errors on Claude.ai, API, Claude Code    **Resolved:** This incident has been resolved.    **Identified:** We have seen success rates for login to Claude.ai,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users report that Claude&amp;#39;s frequent outages often occur around 14:30 UTC, which commenters attribute to the peak load of US Pacific workers coming online while European users are still active &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47779785&quot; title=&quot;Seems to be a very regular occurrence starting around this time of day (14:30 UTC)... Claude Code returning:   API Error: 500 {&amp;#39;type&amp;#39;:&amp;#39;error&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;error&amp;#39;:{&amp;#39;type&amp;#39;:&amp;#39;api_error&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;message&amp;#39;:&amp;#39;Internal server error&amp;#39;},&amp;#39;request_id&amp;#39;:&amp;#39;---&amp;#39;} Over and over again!&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780130&quot; title=&quot;US Pacific comes online while London is still working and they can&amp;#39;t handle it. $380bn valuation btw.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest these failures stem from oversubscribed GPU capacity and global supply constraints, others note that similar scaling issues previously plagued OpenAI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780296&quot; title=&quot;No amount of valuation can fix global supply issues for GPUs for inference unfortunately. I suspect they&amp;#39;re highly oversubscribed, thus the reason why we&amp;#39;re seeing them do other things to cut down on inference cost (ie changing their default thinking length).&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780326&quot; title=&quot;Remember when OpenAI wasn’t allowing new subscriptions to their ChatGPT pro plans because they were oversubscribed? Pepperidge Farms remembers.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The disruptions have led users to seek alternatives and methods for exporting active &amp;#34;Claude Code&amp;#34; sessions to avoid losing progress on complex, multi-file coding tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47779784&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s been a bit disruptive to my workflows tbh. What alternatives are people using? Sell them to me please&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47779950&quot; title=&quot;Have anyone found good techniques to get a session out of Claude Code, so that I can point another tool at it and pick up there?   This always seems to happen at the worst possible time, after having spent an hour getting deep into something – half finished edits across files, subagents running, etc.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://aphyr.com/posts/419-the-future-of-everything-is-lies-i-guess-new-jobs&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Future of Everything Is Lies, I Guess: New Jobs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (aphyr.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47778758&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;273 points · 178 comments · by aphyr&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As machine learning expands, new professional roles are emerging at the human-AI boundary, including prompt &amp;#34;incanters,&amp;#34; quality-control engineers, expert model trainers, &amp;#34;meat shields&amp;#34; for legal accountability, and &amp;#34;haruspices&amp;#34; who investigate and interpret unpredictable model behaviors. &lt;a href=&quot;https://aphyr.com/posts/419-the-future-of-everything-is-lies-i-guess-new-jobs&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Future of Everything is Lies, I Guess: New Jobs    URL Source: https://aphyr.com/posts/419-the-future-of-everything-is-lies-i-guess-new-jobs    Markdown Content:  # The Future of Everything is Lies, I Guess: New Jobs    *   [Aphyr](https://aphyr.com/)  *   [About](https://aphyr.com/about)  *   [Blog](https://aphyr.com/posts)  *   [Photos](https://aphyr.com/photos)  *   [Code](http://github.com/aphyr)    # [The Future of Everything is Lies, I Guess: New…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether AI will remain a tool for &amp;#34;concentrated engineering thinking&amp;#34; or eventually replace the software engineer entirely &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47779585&quot; title=&quot;I am personally of the opinion that ML will end up being &amp;#39;normal technology&amp;#39;, albeit incredibly transformative. I think you can combine &amp;#39;Incanters&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;Process Engineers&amp;#39; into one - &amp;#39;Users&amp;#39;. Jobs that encompass a role that requires accountability will be directing, providing context, and verifying the output of agents, almost like how millions of workers know basic computer skills and Microsoft Office. In my opinion, how at-risk a job is in the LLM era comes down to: 1: How easy is it to…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47779738&quot; title=&quot;As an engineer, I&amp;#39;m never more excited about this job. My implementation speed and bug fixing my typed code to be the bottleneck - now I just think about an implementation and it then exist - As long as I thought about the structure/input/output/testability and logic flow correctly and made sure I included all that information, it just works, nicely, with tests. Unix philosophy works well with LLM too - you can have software that does one thing well and only one thing well, that fit in their…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents of the technology argue that human accountability, judgment, and the ability to define &amp;#34;what not to build&amp;#34; remain irreplaceable bottlenecks that AI cannot currently navigate &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47781598&quot; title=&quot;As someone in 99th percentile in terms of token usage, it&amp;#39;s super clear to me where the agent will not be able to replace my judgement, two areas: 1. if it exceed the context the agent does random stuff, that are often against simplicity and coherent logical structure. 2. LLM has zero intention, and rely on you to decide what to build and more importantly not build. As such, I&amp;#39;m the limit of the numbers of concurrent agents working fo rme, because there is still a limit to my output of…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780923&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Why can&amp;#39;t LLMs and agents progress further to do this software engineering job better than an actual software engineer? Because a machine can never take accountability. If a software engineer throughout the entire year has been directing AI with prompts that created weaker systems then that person is on the chopping block, not the AI. Compared to another software engineer who directed prompts to expand the system and generate extra revenue streams.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, skeptics argue that current technical limitations, such as context windows and lack of intention, are temporary hurdles, and that businesses will eventually use AI to bypass &amp;#34;primadonna&amp;#34; engineers in favor of direct prompting by management &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780630&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Hence why I&amp;#39;ve been quite bullish on software engineering (but not coding). You can easy set up 1) and 2) on contrived or sandboxed coding tasks but then 3) expands and dominates the rest of the role. Why can&amp;#39;t LLMs and agents progress further to do this software engineering job better than an actual software engineer? I&amp;#39;ve never seen anyone give a satisfactory answer to this. Especially the part about making mistakes. A lot of the defense of LLM shortcomings (i.e., generating crappy code)…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47781845&quot; title=&quot;Playing devil&amp;#39;s advocate here, I&amp;#39;m not antagonizing you but thinking out loud. &amp;gt; if it exceed the context the agent does random stuff, that are often against simplicity and coherent logical structure. That&amp;#39;s a current technical limitation. Are you so sure it won&amp;#39;t be overcome in the near/mid future? &amp;gt; LLM has zero intention, and rely on you to decide what to build and more importantly not build But work is being done to even remove or automate this layer, right? It can be hyperbole (in fact, it…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47781040&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Because a machine can never take accountability. A business leader can though. &amp;gt; Compared to another software engineer who directed prompts to expand the system and generate extra revenue streams. I think you&amp;#39;re missing the point. Why can&amp;#39;t an LLM advance sufficiently to be a REAL senior software engineer that a business person/product manager is prompting instead of YOU, a software engineer? Why are YOU specifically needed if an LLM can do a better job of it than you? I can&amp;#39;t believe people…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. This divide creates a tension between those who are &amp;#34;giddy&amp;#34; about their increased implementation speed and those who believe even domain expertise offers no long-term protection from automation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47779738&quot; title=&quot;As an engineer, I&amp;#39;m never more excited about this job. My implementation speed and bug fixing my typed code to be the bottleneck - now I just think about an implementation and it then exist - As long as I thought about the structure/input/output/testability and logic flow correctly and made sure I included all that information, it just works, nicely, with tests. Unix philosophy works well with LLM too - you can have software that does one thing well and only one thing well, that fit in their…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780396&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; As an engineer, I&amp;#39;m never more excited about this job. How long do you think it&amp;#39;ll take for the AI trend to mostly automate the parts of your job that still make you excited? Everyone thinks it won&amp;#39;t be them, it will be others that will be impacted. We all think what we do is somehow unique and cannot be automated away by AI, and that our jobs are safe for the time being.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780653&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s why I just can&amp;#39;t understand the mindset of software engineers who are giddy about this brave new world. There really is nothing special about your expertise that an LLM can&amp;#39;t achieve, theoretically. They’re stupid or they’re already set up for success. The general ideas seems to be generalists are screwed, domain experts will be fine.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tobyord.com/writing/hourly-costs-for-ai-agents&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Are the costs of AI agents also rising exponentially? (2025)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tobyord.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47778922&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;302 points · 128 comments · by louiereederson&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Analysis of METR benchmarking data suggests that the hourly cost of AI agents is rising exponentially alongside performance, potentially creating a gap between the technical capabilities shown in research and what is economically feasible compared to human labor. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tobyord.com/writing/hourly-costs-for-ai-agents&quot; title=&quot;Title: Are the Costs of AI Agents Also Rising Exponentially? — Toby Ord    URL Source: https://www.tobyord.com/writing/hourly-costs-for-ai-agents    Published Time: 2025-12-22T18:30:04+0000    Markdown Content:  As this trend shows no signs of stopping, people have naturally taken to extrapolating it out, to forecast when we might expect AI to be able to do tasks that take an engineer a full work-day; or week; or year.    But we are missing a key piece of information — the cost of performing this…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Current analysis suggests that frontier AI agents are becoming exponentially more expensive as task complexity increases, with some models already costing between $120 and $350 per hour—surpassing median human wages in regions like the UK &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815048&quot; title=&quot;The crazy part about this is if you compare it not to US wages but european, for instance in the UK where the median software hourly wage is somewhere around $35-40 an hour, then humans are already cheaper than the best models.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47812415&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; On many task lengths (including those near their plateau) they cost 10 to 100 times as much per hour. For instance, Grok 4 is at $0.40 per hour at its sweet spot, but $13 per hour at the start of its final plateau. GPT-5 is about $13 per hour for tasks that take about 45 minutes, but $120 per hour for tasks that take 2 hours. And o3 actually costs $350 per hour (more than the human price) to achieve tasks at its full 1.5 hour task horizon. This is a lot of money to pay for an agent that fails…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that specialized &amp;#34;burned-in&amp;#34; silicon could drastically reduce costs and increase speed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814760&quot; title=&quot;Once a model is stable and good enough, for example Sonnet 4.6 or GPT 5.4 (or something else in future), it can be burned into hardware like Talaas chip reducing the cost many times and increasing the speed. At some point we can rely on old model while being productive with it.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815155&quot; title=&quot;But isn&amp;#39;t this happening here https://taalas.com/ already. They have a demo of llama running at 17000 tokens per second https://chatjimmy.ai/&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, skeptics maintain that such hardware advantages evaporate at the scale required for frontier models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815047&quot; title=&quot;No, burning models into hardware won&amp;#39;t make them faster or reduce the cost. It will cost way more for similar performance as what you would get with a gpu. I am not telling you why, you can go figure that out on your own.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815265&quot; title=&quot;With some research, that chip appears like it would cost about $300-$400 to manufacture, die only. For an 8B parameter model. Opus is estimated at 500B-2T parameters. At that scale you’re past reticle limits and need HBM and multi-die packaging, which means you’ve essentially built an inference ASIC (like Groq or Etched) rather than something categorically cheaper than GPUs. The “burned into silicon” advantage mostly evaporates at frontier scale.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Consequently, some commenters predict a market &amp;#34;bubble burst&amp;#34; where unsustainable subsidies end, potentially driving subscription costs to $1,000/month and shifting the competitive advantage toward local, open-source models running on consumer hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47812156&quot; title=&quot;Until there is some drastic new hardware, we are going to see a similar situation to proof of work, where a small group hordes the hardware and can collude on prices. Difference is that the current prices have a lot of subsidies from OPM Once the narrative changes to something more realistic, I can see prices increase across the board, I mean forget $200/month for codex pro, expect $1000/month or something similar. So its a race between new supply of hardware with new paradigm shifts that can…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47812284&quot; title=&quot;Doubtful, local models are the competitive future that will keep prices down. 128GB is all you need. A few more generations of hardware and open models will find people pretty happy doing whatever they need to on their laptop locally with big SOTA models left for special purposes.  There will be a pretty big bubble burst when there aren&amp;#39;t enough customers for $1000/month per seat needed to sustain the enormous datacenter models. Apple will win this battle and nvidia will be second when their…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47811985&quot; title=&quot;Interesting read. I don&amp;#39;t know if I quite buy the evidence, but it&amp;#39;s definitely enough to warrant further investigation. It also matches up with my personal experience, which is that tools like Claude Code are burning through more and more tokens as we push them to do bigger and bigger work. But we all know the frontier model companies are burning through money in an unsustainable race to get you and your company hooked on their tools. So: I buy that the cost of frontier performance is going up…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-04-14</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-04-14</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rareese.com/posts/backblaze/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Backblaze has stopped backing up OneDrive and Dropbox folders and maybe others&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (rareese.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762864&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1127 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 690 comments · by rrreese&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Backblaze has updated its backup client to automatically exclude folders from cloud storage providers like OneDrive, Dropbox, and Google Drive, as well as `.git` directories. Users are criticizing the company for implementing these exclusions silently without direct notification or clear documentation on their website. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rareese.com/posts/backblaze/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Backblaze has quietly stopped backing up your data    URL Source: https://rareese.com/posts/backblaze/    Markdown Content:  # Backblaze has quietly stopped backing up your data | Robert Reese&amp;#39;s Website    # [Robert Reese&amp;#39;s Website](https://rareese.com/)    *   [Travel](https://rareese.com/travel)  *   [Technical](https://rareese.com/technical/)  *   [Blog](https://rareese.com/posts/)  *   [Civilization](https://civhistory.com/)  *   [About](https://rareese.com/about/)    # Backblaze has quietly…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Backblaze&amp;#39;s decision to exclude OneDrive and Dropbox folders from its personal backup service is seen by users as a breach of its &amp;#34;unlimited&amp;#34; storage promise and a failure to act as a reliable last-resort backup &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47763678&quot; title=&quot;I guess the problem with Backblaze&amp;#39;s business model with respect to Backblaze Personal is that it is &amp;#39;unlimited&amp;#39;. They specifically exclude linux users because, well, we&amp;#39;re nerds, r/datahoarders exists, and we have different ideas about what &amp;#39;unlimited&amp;#39; means. [1] This is another example in disguise of two people disagreeing about what &amp;#39;unlimited&amp;#39; means in the context of backup, even if they do claim to have &amp;#39;no restrictions on file type or size&amp;#39; [2]. [1]…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47766798&quot; title=&quot;We are going to drop blackblaze over this We discovered this change recently because my dad was looking for a file that Dropbox accidentally overwrote which at first we said “no problem. This is why we pay for backblaze” We had learned that this policy had changed a few months ago, and we were never notified. File was unrecoverable If anyone at backblaze is reading this, I pay for your product so I can install you on my parents machine and never worry about it again. You decided saving on cloud…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47763434&quot; title=&quot;I can understand in theory why they wouldn&amp;#39;t want to back up .git folders as-is. Git has a serious object count bloat problem if you have any repository with a good amount of commit history, which causes a lot of unnecessary overhead in just scanning the folder for files alone. I don&amp;#39;t quite understand why it&amp;#39;s still like this; it&amp;#39;s probably the biggest reason why git tends to play poorly with a lot of filesystem tools (not just backups). If it&amp;#39;d been something like an SQLite database instead…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters suggest the change is a technical necessity to prevent &amp;#34;files on demand&amp;#34; features from crashing laptops by forcing massive downloads &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47764441&quot; title=&quot;The issue with a client app backing up dropbox and onedrive folders on your computer is the files on demand feature, you could sync a 1tb onedrive to your 250gb laptop but it&amp;#39;s OK because of smart/selective sync aka files on demand. Then backblaze backup tries to back the folder up and requests a download of every single file and now you have zero bytes free, still no backup and a sick laptop.   You could oauth the backblaze app to access onedrive directly, but if you want to back your onedrive…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that excluding synced folders leaves users vulnerable to data loss if a sync service accidentally overwrites or corrupts files &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47766798&quot; title=&quot;We are going to drop blackblaze over this We discovered this change recently because my dad was looking for a file that Dropbox accidentally overwrote which at first we said “no problem. This is why we pay for backblaze” We had learned that this policy had changed a few months ago, and we were never notified. File was unrecoverable If anyone at backblaze is reading this, I pay for your product so I can install you on my parents machine and never worry about it again. You decided saving on cloud…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47767003&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m going to drop Backblaze for my entire company over this. I need it to capture local data, even though that local data is getting synced to Google Drive. Where we sync our data really has nothing to do with Backblaze backing up the endpoint. We don&amp;#39;t wholly trust sync, that&amp;#39;s why we have backup. On my personal Mac I have iCloud Drive syncing my desktop, and a while back iCloud ate a file I was working on. Backblaze had it captured, thankfully. But if they are going to exclude iCloud Drive…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics contend that &amp;#34;unlimited&amp;#34; marketing is inherently unsustainable and signals that financial teams are prioritizing cost-cutting over data integrity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47763779&quot; title=&quot;Any company that does the &amp;#39;unlimited*&amp;#39; shenanigans are automatically out from any selection process I had going, wherever they use it. It&amp;#39;s a clear signal that the marketing/financial teams have taken over the businesses, and they&amp;#39;ll be quick to offload you from the platform given the chance, and you&amp;#39;ll have no recourse. Always prefer businesses who are upfront and honest about what they can offer their users, in a sustainable way.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47763841&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s a clear signal that the marketing/financial teams have taken over the businesses Or that they&amp;#39;re targeting the mass retail market, where people are technically ignorant, and &amp;#39;unlimited&amp;#39; is required to compete. And statistically-speaking, is viable as long as a company keeps its users to a normal distribution.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/davinciresolve/photo&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;DaVinci Resolve – Photo&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blackmagicdesign.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47760529&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1145 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 296 comments · by thebiblelover7&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Blackmagic Design has introduced a dedicated Photo page to DaVinci Resolve, bringing its advanced Hollywood color grading tools, AI-powered effects, and RAW support to still photography. The update includes non-destructive editing, GPU-accelerated processing, and cloud-based collaboration for professional photographers and retouchers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/davinciresolve/photo&quot; title=&quot;Title: DaVinci Resolve – Photo | Blackmagic Design    URL Source: https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/davinciresolve/photo    Markdown Content:  # DaVinci Resolve – Photo | Blackmagic Design    - [x]   *   [Products](https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products)  *   [Resellers](https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/resellers)  *   [Support](https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/support)  *   [Developer](https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/developer)  *   [Company](https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/company)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are excited that DaVinci Resolve is bringing advanced video-centric color science and creative tools like relighting and film emulation to the stagnant photography market &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47761254&quot; title=&quot;This is incredible. There are soooo many features that Davinci already handles so damn well when it comes to color editing, that I only wish they existed in photo editors. To the point there were people posting videos on Youtube about hacky workflows to edit RAW photo files on Resolve and export each one as JPG files haha. Only Darktable seemed to push the technical capabilities of photo editing forward (AgX, parametric masks, tone equalizer, etc), while rest of &amp;#39;industry standard&amp;#39; software…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47761747&quot; title=&quot;The short of it is that there’s no money in photography, compared to videography. Movies routinely have 8 or 9 digit budgets, with teams of hundreds of people who have to collaborate to make footage coming from dozens of different cameras look seamless and consistent. Meanwhile, $1M would be an insane budget for a photo shoot. You can see this in the actual skills of people working in the field as well. Anyone working in video has a solid understanding of the technical underpinnings of their…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some praise its performance on Linux via containerization &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47763141&quot; title=&quot;I recently used Resolve (just the free version) for a project. It was my first time seriously using the software but I ended up spending a lot of time with it - lots of timeline editing, keyframe animation, some simple Fusion compositions, and a fair bit of work in the Fairlight page, rendering out daily . I did all this on my beloved Arch Linux workstation, and frankly it was rock solid, apart from exactly one crash when using the timeline keyframe editor - something that was solved by…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others report significant frustration with outdated audio APIs and codec support on the platform &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762973&quot; title=&quot;I wish they (authors of DaVinci Resolve and the Photo Editor) paid more attention to Linux platform. Theoretically DaVinci Resolve runs on Linux, but getting it run is a very bad experience on Ubuntu/Kubuntu 24.04. I even paid for the DaVinci license, as I read somewhere that for Linux it&amp;#39;s necessary in order to have all codecs supported. It did not help. Fortunately there were no problems with refund. There are whole guides online how to walk around these issues and even then I could not get…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Early testers find the interface confusing and &amp;#34;tacked on&amp;#34; compared to Lightroom, suggesting that while the software is powerful, it currently lacks the intuitive workflow required to sway professional photographers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47764175&quot; title=&quot;I actually downloaded this and tried it. Am I the first one here to do that? As someone who hasn&amp;#39;t touched DaVinci products before (but a lot of experience with LR) - I am immediately confused by the integration of photo editing here. It feels very much like video editing software with photo editing tacked on. I can imagine that this would be much more intuitive for people who are already used to using DaVinci for video editing. I can intuit from the interface that there are a lot of powerful…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2026/04/back-button-hijacking&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A new spam policy for “back button hijacking”&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (developers.google.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47760764&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;912 points · 512 comments · by zdw&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google has introduced a new spam policy targeting &amp;#34;back button hijacking,&amp;#34; a technique that prevents users from returning to search results by manipulating browser history. The policy aims to improve user experience by penalizing sites that trap visitors or redirect them to unwanted content. &lt;a href=&quot;https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2026/04/back-button-hijacking&quot; title=&quot;Title: Introducing a new spam policy for &amp;#39;back button hijacking&amp;#39;  |  Google Search Central Blog  |  Google for Developers    URL Source: https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2026/04/back-button-hijacking    Published Time: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 07:00:00 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Introducing a new spam policy for &amp;#39;back button hijacking&amp;#39; | Google Search Central Blog | Google for Developers  [Skip to main…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users identify major platforms like LinkedIn, Reddit, and Microsoft as frequent offenders that manipulate browser history to trap visitors within their ecosystems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762203&quot; title=&quot;Ok, you can start with LinkedIn, I&amp;#39;ll wait... If you are wondering how it works. You get a link from LinkedIn, it&amp;#39;s from an email or just a post someone shared. You click on it, the URL loads, and you read the post. When you click the back button, you aren&amp;#39;t taken back to wherever you came from. Instead, your LinkedIn feed loads. How did it happen? When you landed on the first link, the URL is replaced with the homepage first (location.replace(...) doesn&amp;#39;t change the browser history). Then the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762216&quot; title=&quot;Also www.reddit.com is/was doing the same back button hijacking.  From google.com visiting a post, then clicking back and you would find yourself on Reddit general feed instead of back to Google.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47761003&quot; title=&quot;Some Microsoft sites have been very guilty of this. They are the ones that stick in my head in recent memory.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that the History API is essential for modern single-page applications and bookmarking, there is a strong consensus that these features are being weaponized for &amp;#34;encrapification&amp;#34; and advertising &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47761026&quot; title=&quot;The iron law of web encrapification: every web feature will (if possible) be employed to abuse the user, usually to push advertising.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762137&quot; title=&quot;The History API is pretty useful. It creates a lot of UX improvement opportunities when you&amp;#39;re not polluting the stack with unnecessary state changes. It&amp;#39;s also a great way to store state so that a user may bookmark or link something directly. It&amp;#39;s straight up necessary for SPAs to behave how they should behave, where navigating back takes you back to the previous page. This feels like a reasonable counter-measure.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Proposed solutions include restricting third-party domains from modifying history stacks and broader calls to limit how much JavaScript can override native browser behaviors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47761535&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Notably, some instances of back button hijacking may originate from the site&amp;#39;s ... advertising platform I feel like anything loaded from a third party domain shouldn&amp;#39;t be allowed to fiddle with the history stack.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47761102&quot; title=&quot;It really comes down to JavaScript. The web was fine when sites were static HTML, images, and forms with server-side rendering (allowing for forums and blogs).&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47761951&quot; title=&quot;Nothing loaded from the web should be able to fiddle with any browser behavior, yet here we are.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stopflock.com&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Stop Flock&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (stopflock.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47772012&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;989 points · 307 comments · by cdrnsf&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stop Flock is a campaign raising awareness about Flock Safety’s AI-powered surveillance network, which uses &amp;#34;vehicle fingerprints&amp;#34; to track movement patterns and associations across a nationwide database accessible to police without a warrant, sparking significant Fourth Amendment and privacy concerns. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stopflock.com&quot; title=&quot;Title: Stop Flock    URL Source: https://stopflock.com/    Published Time: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 18:53:35 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Stop Flock    # Stop Flock    Mass surveillance isn&amp;#39;t public safety - it&amp;#39;s public control.    [Home](https://stopflock.com/)[App](https://deflock.me/app)    ## Table of Contents    *   [What Are Flock Cameras?](https://stopflock.com/#introduction)  *   [How Widespread Are These Cameras?](https://stopflock.com/#how-widespread)  *   [Why Privacy…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a tension between public safety and the dangers of mass surveillance, with some arguing that institutional leaders face immense pressure to eliminate camera blind spots to track criminals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47773611&quot; title=&quot;I followed the shooting at Brown University last year very closely. Brown&amp;#39;s leadership was heavily criticized for having camera blind spots and not being able to track the shooter&amp;#39;s exact movements through campus. I can understand why people with stewardship over the safety of their students/customers/constituents would make decisions to err on the side of tracking. I&amp;#39;m not saying I agree with it, but I understand it.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics contend that the current business model of data brokering creates &amp;#34;toxic waste&amp;#34; that threatens privacy, suggesting that data should be treated as a legal extension of the home requiring warrants and mandatory notifications &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47773673&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t want to stop Flock the company. I want to stop Flock the business model, along with all the other mass surveillance, and the data brokers. If the business models can&amp;#39;t be made illegal, it should at least come with liabilities so high that no sane business would want to hold data that is essentially toxic waste. Without that, we are quickly spiraling into the dystopia where privacy is gone, and when the wrong person gets access to the data, entire populations are threatened.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47773872&quot; title=&quot;We need a law that says if you hold any data about a person, they must be notified when anyone accesses it, including law enforcement. I used to work in criminal investigations.  I understand how this might make investigation of real crime more difficult.  But so does the fact that you need a warrant to enter someone&amp;#39;s home, and yet we manage to investigate crime anyway. Your data should be an extension of your home, even if it&amp;#39;s held by another company.  It should require a warrant and…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue there is no expectation of privacy in public spaces &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47774165&quot; title=&quot;Why do people consistently and falsely believe that they have privacy in public settings? You are literally out in public. If you don&amp;#39;t want your behavior in public to be observed, then either don&amp;#39;t behave in such a way that you wouldn&amp;#39;t want observed, or stay home. UPDATE: don&amp;#39;t conflate stalking with observation. These are not the same. You can observe, but you cannot intimidate.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others emphasize the need to close legal loopholes that allow the government to &amp;#34;launder&amp;#34; information through third parties to bypass Fourth Amendment protections &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47773771&quot; title=&quot;You want to stop the source, which is that the government and other agencies can purchase surveillance data that would otherwise be disallowed by the 4th amendment. We need to end this &amp;#39;laundering&amp;#39; of information through third parties, and enforce the constitution by its intent.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47773952&quot; title=&quot;The entities holding the information here are literally police departments. The information itself is evidence, used in active criminal investigations. It&amp;#39;s good to want things, though.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://code.claude.com/docs/en/routines&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Claude Code Routines&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (code.claude.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47768133&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;718 points · 413 comments · by matthieu_bl&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Claude Code routines are automated, cloud-based configurations that execute tasks like code reviews and backlog maintenance via scheduled, API, or GitHub event triggers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://code.claude.com/docs/en/routines&quot; title=&quot;Title: Automate work with routines - Claude Code Docs    URL Source: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/routines    Markdown Content:  A routine is a saved Claude Code configuration: a prompt, one or more repositories, and a set of [connectors](https://code.claude.com/docs/en/mcp), packaged once and run automatically. Routines execute on Anthropic-managed cloud infrastructure, so they keep working when your laptop is closed.Each routine can have one or more triggers attached to it:    *   **Scheduled**:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The introduction of Claude Code Routines has sparked significant skepticism regarding vendor lock-in, with users expressing a lack of trust in Anthropic’s long-term stability and a preference for &amp;#34;dumb pipe&amp;#34; API access over integrated platforms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769425&quot; title=&quot;LLMs and LLM providers are massive black boxes. I get a lot of value from them and so I can put up with that to a certain extent, but these new &amp;#39;products&amp;#39;/features that Anthropic are shipping are very unappealing to me. Not because I can&amp;#39;t see a use-case for them, but because I have 0 trust in them: - No trust that they won&amp;#39;t nerf the tool/model behind the feature - No trust they won&amp;#39;t sunset the feature (the graveyard of LLM-features is vast and growing quickly while they throw stuff at the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769963&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; - No trust that they won&amp;#39;t nerf the tool/model behind the feature I actually trust that they will.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Developers are particularly concerned about confusing Terms of Service regarding third-party harnesses and the potential for account termination when integrating these tools into external applications &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47768821&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m a little confused on the ToS here. From what I gathered, running `claude -p ` on cron is fine, but putting it in my Telegram bot is a ToS violation (unless I use per-token billing) because it&amp;#39;s a 3rd party harness, right? (`claude -p` being a trivial workaround for the &amp;#39;no 3rd party stuff on the subscription&amp;#39; rule) This Routines feature notably works with the subscription, and it also has API callbacks. So if my Telegram bot calls that API... do I get my Anthropic account nuked or not?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47768947&quot; title=&quot;Wait we can&amp;#39;t use claude -p around other tools? What is the point of the JSON SDK then? Anthropic is confusing here, ugh. edit : And specifically i&amp;#39;m making an IDE, and trying to get ClaudeCode into it. I frankly have no clue when Claude usage is simply part of an IDE and &amp;#39;okay&amp;#39; and when it becomes a third party harness..&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, many users report a perceived decline in model performance and &amp;#34;nerfing,&amp;#34; questioning how autonomous routines can function effectively under increasingly restrictive usage limits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47770354&quot; title=&quot;Unrelated, but Claude was performing so tragically last few days, maybe week(s), but days mostly, that I had to reluctantly switch. Reluctantly because I enjoy it. Even the most basic stuff, like most python scripts it has to rerun because of some syntax error. The new reality of coding took away one of the best things for me - that the computer always just does what it is told to do. If the results are wrong it means I&amp;#39;m wrong, I made a bug and I can debug it. Here.. I&amp;#39;m not a hater, it&amp;#39;s a…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47770501&quot; title=&quot;I believe the current game everybody plays is: * make sure the model maxes out all benchmarks * release it * after some time, nerf it * repeat the same with the next model However, the net sum is positive: in general, models from 2026 are better than those from 2024.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47768517&quot; title=&quot;Given the alleged recent extreme reduction in Claude Code usage limits ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47739260 ), how do these more autonomous tools work within that constraint? Are they effectively only usable with a 20x Max plan? EDIT: This comment is apparently [dead] and idk why.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some compare these fears to early cloud adoption anxieties that never fully materialized &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47771037&quot; title=&quot;This is a similar sentiment I heard early on in the cloud adoption fever, many companies hedged by being “multi cloud” which ended up mostly being abandoned due to hostile patterns by cloud providers, and a lot of cost. Ultimately it didn’t really end up mattering and the most dire predictions of vendor lock in abuse didn’t really happen as feared (I know people will disagree with this, but specifically speaking about aws, the predictions vs what actually happened is a massive gap. note I have…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others are impressed by Anthropic&amp;#39;s rapid feature delivery, which is quickly outpacing open-source alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47768561&quot; title=&quot;OpenClawd had about a two week moat... Feature delivery rate by Anthropic is basically a fast takeoff in miniature.  Pushing out multiple features each week that used to take enterprises quarters to deliver.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769796&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tell HN: Fiverr left customer files public and searchable&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769796&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;828 points · 231 comments · by morpheuskafka&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fiverr is reportedly exposing sensitive customer documents and PII in public Google search results due to the use of unsecured Cloudinary URLs for private messaging and work products. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769796&quot; title=&quot;Fiverr (gig work&amp;amp;#x2F;task platform, competitor to Upwork) uses a service called Cloudinary to process PDF&amp;amp;#x2F;images in messaging, including work products from the worker to client.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Besides the PDF processing value add, Cloudinary effectively acts like S3 here, serving assets directly to the web client. Like S3, it has support for signed&amp;amp;#x2F;expiring URLs. However, Fiverr opted to use public URLs, not signed ones, for sensitive client-worker communication.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Moreover, it seems like they…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fiverr has faced criticism for leaving sensitive customer files—including tax forms, API tokens, admin credentials, and internal reports—publicly searchable and accessible &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47772068&quot; title=&quot;really bad stuff in the results. very easy to find API tokens, penetration test reports, confidental PDFs, internal APIs. Fiverr needs to immediately block all static asset access until this is resolved. business continuity should not be a concern here.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47772082&quot; title=&quot;lots of admin credentials too, which have probably never been changed&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47771760&quot; title=&quot;This is crazy! So many tax and other financial forms out in the open. But the most interesting file I’ve seen so far seems to be a book draft titled “HOOD NIGGA AFFIRMATIONS: A Collection of Affirming Anecdotes for Hood Niggas Everywhere”. I made it to page 27 out of 63.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47772158&quot; title=&quot;admin passwords to dating sites, that&amp;#39;s the stuff people get blackmailed with&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While Fiverr claims they are working on a resolution and disputed the timeline of initial reports, users argue the leak is so severe that the company should immediately block all static asset access regardless of business impact &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47772469&quot; title=&quot;I wrote to security@fiverr.com and they just replied: &amp;#39;You’re the second person to flag this issue to us Please note that our records show no contact with Fiverr security regarding this matter ~40 days ago unlike the poster claims. We are currently working to resolve the situation&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47772068&quot; title=&quot;really bad stuff in the results. very easy to find API tokens, penetration test reports, confidental PDFs, internal APIs. Fiverr needs to immediately block all static asset access until this is resolved. business continuity should not be a concern here.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47773073&quot; title=&quot;Wow, the other comments weren&amp;#39;t exaggerating. This is really bad. If my tax returns or other data were part of this, I might consider legal action. I wonder if somewhere like Wired/Ars Technica/404media might pick this up?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The incident sparked a debate over professional standards: some argue for mandatory software engineering certifications to prevent such incompetence, while others contend that licensing would be an ineffective &amp;#34;hassle&amp;#34; that cannot solve fundamental carelessness &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47772240&quot; title=&quot;Software development jobs are too accessible. Jobs with access to/control over millions of people&amp;#39;s data should require some kind of genuine software engineering certification, and there should be business-cratering fines for something as egregious as completely ignoring security reports. It is ridiculous how we&amp;#39;ve completely normalised leaks like this on a weekly or almost-daily basis.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47773529&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; should require some kind of genuine software engineering certification Wouldn&amp;#39;t change a thing, other than add another hassle you have to pay for to do your job. This is the result of carelessness, not someone who didn&amp;#39;t know that private data should be private because they weren&amp;#39;t certified.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47772565&quot; title=&quot;Teachers have to be licensed and keep up on licensing. Plumbers. Electricians. Lawyers. Doctors. Hell, I have to get a license to run my own business. Why shouldn&amp;#39;t software come with a branch for licenses if you&amp;#39;re working with sensitive data?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47773658&quot; title=&quot;This is the result of somebody who has no idea how the fuck the tech they&amp;#39;re using works. They surely knew it should be private, but they did not know that they were making it publicly available because they were blindly fumbling their way around in a job beyond their competence level. There is a 0% chance this was ordinary carelessness, in the form of &amp;#39;I know better but don&amp;#39;t care enough&amp;#39;, this is so clearly a case of &amp;#39;I don&amp;#39;t know what I&amp;#39;m doing&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://steveklabnik.github.io/jujutsu-tutorial/introduction/what-is-jj-and-why-should-i-care.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;jj – the CLI for Jujutsu&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (steveklabnik.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47763759&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;547 points · 494 comments · by tigerlily&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jujutsu (`jj`) is a distributed version control system that aims to be simpler and more powerful than Git while maintaining full Git compatibility, allowing users to adopt its advanced workflows without requiring their collaborators to switch. &lt;a href=&quot;https://steveklabnik.github.io/jujutsu-tutorial/introduction/what-is-jj-and-why-should-i-care.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: What is jj and why should I care?    URL Source: https://steveklabnik.github.io/jujutsu-tutorial/introduction/what-is-jj-and-why-should-i-care.html    Published Time: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 19:37:17 GMT    Markdown Content:  # What is jj and why should I care? - Steve&amp;#39;s Jujutsu Tutorial    - [x]     1.   [**1.** Introduction](https://steveklabnik.github.io/jujutsu-tutorial/introduction/introduction.html)  2.       1.   [**1.1.** What is jj and why should I…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary debate surrounding `jj` centers on its &amp;#34;automatic commit&amp;#34; behavior, which some users find intuitive for tracking logical changes while others view it as a &amp;#34;footgun&amp;#34; that risks accidentally rewriting history &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47764486&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m giving jj a try but one aspect of it I dislike is edits to files are automatically committed, so you need to defensively create empty new commits for your changes. As in, want to browse the repo from a commit 2 weeks ago? Well if you just checkout that commit and then edit a file, you&amp;#39;ve automatically changed that commit in your repo and rebased everything after it on top of your new changes. So instead you create a new branch off of the old commit and add an empty commit to that branch so…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47765042&quot; title=&quot;Does JJ really prefer for me to think backwards? It wants me to start with the new and describe command, but with git I first make the changes and name the changeset at the end of the workflow. I also often end up with in a dirty repo state with multiple changes belonging to separate features or abstractions. I usually just pick the changes I want to group into a commit and clean up the state. Since it&amp;#39;s git compatible, it feels like it must work to add files and keep files uncommitted, but…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47764973&quot; title=&quot;jj edit is the biggest jj footgun I can think of, as other comments said just use jj new. But also if you do accidentally edit or change something jj undo works surprisingly well. I found when using jj it worked best for me when I stopped thinking in commits (which jj treats as very cheap “snapshots” of your code) and instead focus on the “changes”. Felt weird for me at first, but I realized when I was rebasing with git that’s how I viewed the logical changes I made anyway, jj just makes it…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that the `jj edit` command leads to unintended rebases of subsequent work, though proponents suggest using `jj new` to create cheap snapshots instead of traditional Git-style staging &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47764973&quot; title=&quot;jj edit is the biggest jj footgun I can think of, as other comments said just use jj new. But also if you do accidentally edit or change something jj undo works surprisingly well. I found when using jj it worked best for me when I stopped thinking in commits (which jj treats as very cheap “snapshots” of your code) and instead focus on the “changes”. Felt weird for me at first, but I realized when I was rebasing with git that’s how I viewed the logical changes I made anyway, jj just makes it…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47764533&quot; title=&quot;Just don&amp;#39;t ever use `edit`, use `new` instead; then your changes are tracked without making a mess.  I think that&amp;#39;s much nicer than juggling stashes in git.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47765527&quot; title=&quot;How are you &amp;#39;checking out&amp;#39; the old commit? It sounds like you&amp;#39;re using `jj edit`, which I&amp;#39;d argue does what it says on the tin. Switch to using `jj new ` and your problem goes away.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite disagreements over the workflow&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;backward&amp;#34; mental model, there is strong consensus that `jj`’s Git-compatible backend makes it a low-risk tool to trial within existing ecosystems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47764401&quot; title=&quot;The last paragraph might be the most important one: &amp;gt; There&amp;#39;s one other reason you should be interested in giving jj a try: it has a git compatible backend, and so you can use jj on your own, without requiring anyone else you&amp;#39;re working with to convert too. This means that there&amp;#39;s no real downside to giving it a shot; if it&amp;#39;s not for you, you&amp;#39;re not giving up all of the history you wrote with it, and can go right back to git with no issues.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47764472&quot; title=&quot;We all need to give ourselves a push and finally make the next step in version control. Github, Google, Microsoft, Meta (did I forget anyone relevant? Probably) should just join forces and finally make it happen, which should not be a problem with a new system that is backend compatible to Git. Sure, Github may lose some appeal to their brand name, but hey, this is actually for making the world a better place.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://honeypot.net/2026/04/14/i-wrote-to-flocks-privacy.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I wrote to Flock&amp;#39;s privacy contact to opt out of their domestic spying program&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (honeypot.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47768813&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;669 points · 258 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Flock Safety denied a California resident&amp;#39;s CCPA request to delete personal and vehicle data, claiming that as a service provider, it cannot fulfill requests directly because its customers own and control the collected information. &lt;a href=&quot;https://honeypot.net/2026/04/14/i-wrote-to-flocks-privacy.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Getting the Flock out    URL Source: https://honeypot.net/2026/04/14/i-wrote-to-flocks-privacy.html    Published Time: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 22:19:21 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Getting the Flock out | Honeypot.net    # [![Image 1: Honeypot.net logo](https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/d0e26881a0f918e9d92c7f32c2e3aa9a?s=96&amp;amp;d=https%3A%2F%2Fmicro.blog%2Fimages%2Fblank_avatar.png)Honeypot.net](https://honeypot.net/)    - [x] Menu Menu    *   [About](https://honeypot.net/about/)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary debate centers on whether Flock Safety acts as a mere service provider, similar to a cloud storage vendor, or as a data broker responsible for the information its cameras collect &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769119&quot; title=&quot;They were saying &amp;#39;don&amp;#39;t write to us, talk to the people who own the cameras and ask them to delete the data&amp;#39;. A company that manufactures video cameras is not the one to talk to when someone records you, talk to the person who recorded you. But a reasonable person would say -- the data is stored on Flock servers, not with the camera owners. And Flock would say, just because we sell data storage functionality to camera owners doesn&amp;#39;t mean we own the data, anymore than a storage service you rent…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769361&quot; title=&quot;But the data collected is property of the government and flock is not allowed to use that data for additional business gain (according to their statements)... So they can&amp;#39;t sell the fact that you&amp;#39;re at Target at 8:00 p.m. on Thursday to anybody... Nor build profiles to sell to advertisers... And if that&amp;#39;s the case that&amp;#39;s very similar to cloud storage vendors. If I access hacker news, and the record of my visit is stored in an AWS S3 bucket, I can&amp;#39;t submit to AWS to delete my visitor record,…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769947&quot; title=&quot;That makes them a data broker in my reading, and at least in California, Data Broker legislation should apply.  CA Data Broker registry gives me access denied, but that could be because I am outside US.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Flock claims that customers own the data, but critics argue the company maintains &amp;#34;unfettered access&amp;#34; to a massive surveillance network to drive its multi-billion dollar valuation while shifting legal liability to local agencies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47768989&quot; title=&quot;I wrote this. I had/have absolutely no expectation that Flock would comply with my request, but figured I should try anyway For Science. Their reply rubbed me wrong, though. They seem to claim that there are no restrictions on their collection and processing of PII because other people pay them for it. They say: &amp;gt; Flock Safety’s customers own the data and make all decisions around how such data is used and shared. which seems to directly oppose the CCPA. It&amp;#39;s my data, not their customers&amp;#39;.…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769851&quot; title=&quot;Except that Flock very clearly benefits financially from having direct access to this data: owning (and in their own documentation, they very clearly do own it) a network of 80,000 surveillance devices across the country, and owning every single transit point for the data they collect, is what gets them to a $7.5 billion valuation from investors. The fact of the matter is that Flock is playing two-step with the concept of &amp;#39;ownership&amp;#39; of data. They disclaim ownership as a way to leave local…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant disagreement over whether license plate captures in public constitute &amp;#34;personal information&amp;#34; under the CCPA and whether the company&amp;#39;s ownership of the hardware makes them legally responsible for deletion requests &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769501&quot; title=&quot;Wait, is it your data? If you drive your car in front of a Ring camera on my house (I don&amp;#39;t have a Ring camera don&amp;#39;t @ me), is it your claim that you own the data on that camera?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769564&quot; title=&quot;Did you put up a Ring camera on a stand in front of your house for the specific purpose of selling that I drove past at this specific timestamp? If so, yes. The CCPA[0] gives me explicit legal rights: * The right to know about the personal information a business collects about them and how it is used and shared; * The right to delete personal information collected from them (with some exceptions); * The right to opt-out of the sale or sharing of their personal information including via the GPC;…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769802&quot; title=&quot;“Personal information” has a legal definition and photos of you in a public street might not satisfy it, regardless of the photographer’s intent.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769286&quot; title=&quot;If you go to Rent-A-Center and rent a DSLR, that doesn&amp;#39;t make Rent-A-Center responsible for the pictures taken by their cameras.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/13/thousands-of-rare-concert-recordings-are-landing-on-the-internet-archive-listen-now/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rare concert recordings are landing on the Internet Archive&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techcrunch.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47765604&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;708 points · 216 comments · by jrm-veris&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Internet Archive is digitizing music superfan Aadam Jacobs’ collection of over 10,000 rare concert cassette tapes recorded since the 1980s, featuring previously unreleased performances from artists like Nirvana, Phish, and Sonic Youth. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/13/thousands-of-rare-concert-recordings-are-landing-on-the-internet-archive-listen-now/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Thousands of rare concert recordings are landing on the Internet Archive — listen now    URL Source: https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/13/thousands-of-rare-concert-recordings-are-landing-on-the-internet-archive-listen-now/    Published Time: 2026-04-13T20:20:47+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Thousands of rare concert recordings are landing on the Internet Archive -- listen now | TechCrunch  [Skip to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The preservation of rare concert recordings on the Internet Archive highlights the historical value of bootlegging, with recordists sharing anecdotes of bands embracing high-quality fan recordings as valuable additions to their digital legacy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47767452&quot; title=&quot;I am an active and enthusiastic recordist and have decades of stuff I&amp;#39;ve accumulated over the years. One of the concerts I captured in the 90&amp;#39;s, lives on as a bootleg which I often see around the scene of this one particularly great live electronic dance band, whose punters have created true value out of the hour and a half of live concert input I managed to record, standing right there front stage and center, with the band looking right at me. It was a hilarious experience - I expected to get…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47770003&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; However, I do notice that for more uncommon music, the record industry sort it just looks the other way. For example Eminem has tons of really old music on YouTube that I’m sure his lawyers could figure out how to get taken down. But it just stays up. Or artists that have seen the merit in tolerating it/somewhat encouraging it. I&amp;#39;m a pretty hardcore Nine Inch Nails fan (seen &amp;gt;30 shows). NINLive.com is a fantastic (unofficial) archive for our community. Close to 2k individual recordings, about…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users lament the loss of physical music shops where such &amp;#34;gems&amp;#34; were once easily accessible, others argue that copyright laws should be reformed to move music into the public domain after 30 years &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47766262&quot; title=&quot;This is one of the best things I&amp;#39;ve read about in a bit. It wasn&amp;#39;t uncommon to buy marked-up (overpriced) bootlegs of live performances on CDs in the 90s. You never knew in advance if it&amp;#39;d be a quality recording or total garbage. We&amp;#39;ve lost that. I still love when one of my live bootlegs of Faith No More comes on with them doing (sometimes mocking) parodies of popular music (their rendition of Nothing Compares to You by Sinead OConnor has been in my head as I type this). When I got to see them…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47768481&quot; title=&quot;We shouldn’t need the managers, but the record industry does everything it can to consolidate everything. However, I do notice that for more uncommon music, the record industry sort it just looks the other way. For example Eminem has tons of really old music on YouTube that I’m sure his lawyers could figure out how to get taken down. But it just stays up. I would really like music copyright to change within my lifetime. It should realistically be 30 years from first release, and after that it…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong consensus that artists benefit from these archives, leading to suggestions that musicians should officially record and sell live sets directly to attendees &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47766642&quot; title=&quot;Tangent idea: musicians should record every live show, and then put it on a streaming service, only for people who bought tickets to the show (possibly for an extra small fee on the ticket).  Extra revenue for the artist, and a cool benefit for the fan (the liver performance you attended).&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47766262&quot; title=&quot;This is one of the best things I&amp;#39;ve read about in a bit. It wasn&amp;#39;t uncommon to buy marked-up (overpriced) bootlegs of live performances on CDs in the 90s. You never knew in advance if it&amp;#39;d be a quality recording or total garbage. We&amp;#39;ve lost that. I still love when one of my live bootlegs of Faith No More comes on with them doing (sometimes mocking) parodies of popular music (their rendition of Nothing Compares to You by Sinead OConnor has been in my head as I type this). When I got to see them…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bandaancha.eu/articulos/telefonica-consigue-bloqueos-ips-11731&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Spain to expand internet blocks to tennis, golf, movies broadcasting times&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bandaancha.eu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47768195&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;446 points · 460 comments · by akyuu&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bandaancha.eu/articulos/telefonica-consigue-bloqueos-ips-11731&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate centers on whether Spain’s aggressive internet blocking is a response to a &amp;#34;service problem&amp;#34; or a &amp;#34;pricing problem.&amp;#34; Some argue that piracy persists because official services are fragmented, laden with ads, and difficult to cancel &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47768740&quot; title=&quot;Assuming that &amp;#39;piracy is a service problem, not a pricing problem&amp;#39; is still the prevailing wisdom, what is Spain / La Liga doing wrong that sports piracy is so prevalent as to warrant this? It seems like a no-brainer to expand stream availability and charge appropriately for it vs. scheduling daily kneecaps of other economic activity.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769400&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a service problem. Every new service is a colossal headache to set up payment, remember to cancel payment if you only wanted to see the single event and have no need for the service the rest of the year, find what&amp;#39;s playing on what when, deal with their bullshit when they add ads onto an ad-free plan that you bought only because it was ad-free, yadda yadda yadda. The suits could have had 10x as much money out of me if I could just pay one-time prices. &amp;#39;Sure, fork over $10 and you can have…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend that many users pirate simply to get &amp;#34;free stuff&amp;#34; as a game or cultural habit, even when they can afford to pay &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769328&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Assuming that &amp;#39;piracy is a service problem, not a pricing problem&amp;#39; is still the prevailing wisdom I don&amp;#39;t have experience with broadcast media (in Spain, especially) but I a little experience on the software side: I could not believe the lengths some people would go to in order to avoid paying even $5-10 for useful software. Hours of work, sketchy cracks, downloading things from websites likely to compromise their system. Some of them would become irate when the software was updated and broke…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769514&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Every new service is a colossal headache to set up payment, remember to cancel payment if you only wanted to see the single event and have no need for the service the rest of the year, find what&amp;#39;s playing on what when I just don&amp;#39;t find these arguments convincing after watching my friend spend cumulative hours upon hours jumping between pirate streaming services trying to find a stable feed for every game. This feels too much like a post-hoc rationalization. I know I&amp;#39;ll never win this argument…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics suggest these blocks are an &amp;#34;absurd&amp;#34; overreach by a bureaucratic state that undermines privacy and should be regulated at the EU level &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47768843&quot; title=&quot;Seems obvious at this point there needs to be EU-level regulations against individual countries, such as Spain and Italy, implementing these absurd restrictions. It would at least make lobbying from those sports companies more difficult. These same companies have been pushing for banning VPNs -- consumer VPNs -- as they easily circumvent half the internet going dark because of some dumb sports event, and they&amp;#39;re going to be targeted next when everyone&amp;#39;s using them. It doesn&amp;#39;t help &amp;#39;piracy&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47768699&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s always hilarious to see HN users claim how the &amp;#39;quality of life&amp;#39; is so much better in the EU than the USA. When in reality most of them only ever visit a handful of EU first-tier cities for short vacations or business trips, and never have to deal with the reality of living and working under an oppressive bureaucratic state.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47768591&quot; title=&quot;This is incredibly stupid, but don&amp;#39;t laugh at Spaniards: your (and my) lawmakers are equally likely to enact similarly stupid laws. It&amp;#39;s mind-boggling how stupid the world can be sometimes.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, some believe pirate sites will always offer a superior user experience because they lack the legal and financial constraints of official channels &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769114&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; &amp;#39;piracy is a service problem, not a pricing problem&amp;#39; I never buy into this. If copyright law doesn&amp;#39;t exist, pirate sites will eventually always provide better service than the official channels. One example is scanlation manga. Chinese scanlation sites have reached the theoretical ceiling of service: just serve images fast with a little nonintrusive ad. No login required. No way the official Japanese apps can provide significant better service than that.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dbreunig.com/2026/04/14/cybersecurity-is-proof-of-work-now.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cybersecurity looks like proof of work now&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (dbreunig.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769089&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;557 points · 213 comments · by dbreunig&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of highly capable AI models like Anthropic’s Mythos is shifting cybersecurity into a &amp;#34;proof of work&amp;#34; model, where system hardening requires organizations to outspend attackers on token-based exploit discovery to ensure security. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dbreunig.com/2026/04/14/cybersecurity-is-proof-of-work-now.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Cybersecurity Looks Like Proof of Work Now    URL Source: https://www.dbreunig.com/2026/04/14/cybersecurity-is-proof-of-work-now.html    Published Time: 2026-04-14T07:42:00-07:00    Markdown Content:  # Cybersecurity Looks Like Proof of Work Now    [dbreunig.com](https://www.dbreunig.com/)    [Contact](https://www.dbreunig.com/contact.html)    Apr 14, 2026    AI    DEVELOPMENT    SECURITY    MYTHOS    # Cybersecurity Looks Like Proof of Work Now    ### Is security spending more tokens than your attacker?    Last…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The integration of LLMs into cybersecurity creates a &amp;#34;proof of work&amp;#34; dynamic where defenders may hold a structural advantage due to full source code access and the ability to fix vulnerabilities before attackers discover them &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47785275&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s still the question of access to the codebase. By all accounts, the best LLM cyber scanning approaches are really primitive - it&amp;#39;s just a bash script that goes through every single file in the codebase and, for each one and runs a &amp;#39;find the vulns here&amp;#39; prompt. The attacker usually has even less access than this - in the beginning, they have network tools, an undocumented API, and maybe some binaries. You can do a lot better efficiency-wise if you control the source end-to-end though -…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47785423&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve said for decades that, in principle , cybersecurity is advantage defender. The defender has to leave a hole. The attackers have to find it. We just live in a world with so many holes that dedicated attackers rarely end up bottlenecked on finding holes, so in practice it ends up advantage attacker. There is at least a possibility that a code base can be secured by a (practically) finite number of tokens until there is no more holes in it, for reasonable amounts of money. This also reminds…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. However, this shift also empowers attackers by drastically lowering the labor costs of reverse engineering and decompilation through token-intensive automated audits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47785291&quot; title=&quot;Tokens can also be burnt on decompilation.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47785364&quot; title=&quot;Yes, and it apparently burns lots of tokens. But what I&amp;#39;ve heard is that the outcomes are drastically less expensive than hand-reversing was, when you account for labor costs.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47785855&quot; title=&quot;Can confirm. Matching decompilation in particular (where you match the compiler along with your guess at source, compile, then compare assembly, repeating if it doesn&amp;#39;t match) is very token-intensive, but it&amp;#39;s now very viable: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46080498 Of course LLMs see a lot more source-assembly pairs than even skilled reverse engineers, so this makes sense. Any area where you can get unlimited training data is one we expect to see top-tier performance from LLMs. (also, hi…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that defenders must be perfect while attackers only need one lucky break &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47785473&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;in principle, cybersecurity is advantage defender I disagree. The defender must be right every single time. The attacker only has to get lucky and thanks to scale they can do that every day all day in most large organizations.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest that the rapid evolution of models is currently outperforming manual improvements to security harnesses &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47786227&quot; title=&quot;On that latest episode of &amp;#39;Security Cryptography Whatever&amp;#39; [0] they mention that the time spent on improving the harness (at the moment) end up being outperformed by the strategy of &amp;#39;wait for the next model&amp;#39;. I doubt that will continue, but it broke my intuition about how to improve them [0] https://securitycryptographywhatever.com/2026/03/25/ai-bug-f...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kirancodes.me/posts/log-who-watches-the-watchers.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Lean proved this program correct; then I found a bug&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (kirancodes.me)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47759709&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;395 points · 177 comments · by bumbledraven&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fuzzing a formally verified Lean implementation of zlib revealed a heap buffer overflow in the Lean 4 runtime and a denial-of-service bug in an unverified archive parser, demonstrating that software remains vulnerable to flaws in its underlying foundations and unproven components. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kirancodes.me/posts/log-who-watches-the-watchers.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Lean proved this program was correct; then I found a bug.    URL Source: https://kirancodes.me/posts/log-who-watches-the-watchers.html    Published Time: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 18:59:10 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Lean proved this program was correct; then I found a bug.    [![Image 1](https://kirancodes.me/images/banner.svg)](https://kirancodes.me/)    To Proof Maintenance &amp;amp; Beyond!    1.   [Home](https://kirancodes.me/index.html)  2.   [Posts](https://kirancodes.me/posts.html)    ## Lean proved this program…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether a &amp;#34;bug&amp;#34; found outside the scope of a formal proof—specifically in the C++ runtime or due to specification gaps—invalidates the claim of a program being &amp;#34;proven correct&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47760024&quot; title=&quot;This article’s framing and title are odd. The author, in fact, found no bugs or errors in the proven code. She says so at the end of the article: &amp;gt; The two bugs that were found both sat outside the boundary of what the proofs cover. The denial-of-service was a missing specification. The heap overflow was a deeper issue in the trusted computing base, the C++ runtime that the entire proof edifice assumes is correct. Still an interesting and useful result to find a bug in the Lean runtime, but I’d…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47760783&quot; title=&quot;We&amp;#39;re not speaking about bugs in a verified system so much as writing articles making specific claims about that. Surely if we&amp;#39;re at the level of precision of formal verification, it&amp;#39;s incumbent upon us to be precise about the nature of a problem with it, no? &amp;#39;Lean proved this program correct and then I found a bug&amp;#39; heavily implies a flaw in the proof, not a flaw in the runtime (which to my mind would also be a compelling statement, for the reasons you describe).&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47759964&quot; title=&quot;Am I reading the article wrong?  It appears that the author did not test the claims of the proof.  Wouldn&amp;#39;t a &amp;#39;bug&amp;#39; in this case mean she found an input that did not survive a round trip through the compression algorithm? Update: Actually, I guess this may have been her point: &amp;#39;The two bugs that were found both sat outside the boundary of what the proofs cover.&amp;#39;  So then I guess the title might be a bit click baity.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the title is clickbait because the verified logic remained sound &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47760024&quot; title=&quot;This article’s framing and title are odd. The author, in fact, found no bugs or errors in the proven code. She says so at the end of the article: &amp;gt; The two bugs that were found both sat outside the boundary of what the proofs cover. The denial-of-service was a missing specification. The heap overflow was a deeper issue in the trusted computing base, the C++ runtime that the entire proof edifice assumes is correct. Still an interesting and useful result to find a bug in the Lean runtime, but I’d…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47760269&quot; title=&quot;Clickbait title, the proved part of the program had no bugs? As an aside, why can&amp;#39;t people just write factually? This isn&amp;#39;t a news site gamed for ad revenue. It&amp;#39;s also less effort. I felt this post was mostly an insulting waste of time. I come to HN to read interesting stuff.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, the author contends that for end users, any crash or exploit in the final binary constitutes a failure of the system&amp;#39;s promised security &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47760076&quot; title=&quot;Repeating myself, when we speak of bugs in a verified software system, I think it&amp;#39;s fair to consider the entire binary a fair target. If a buffer overflow causes the system to be exploited and all your bitcoins to be stolen, I don&amp;#39;t think the fact that the bug being in the language runtime is going to be much consolation. Especially if the software you were running was advertised as formally verified as free of bugs. Second, there was a bug in the code. Maybe not a functional correctness bug,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47760057&quot; title=&quot;Hi! Author here. When we speak of bugs in a verified software system, I think it&amp;#39;s fair to consider the entire binary a fair target. If a buffer overflow causes the system to be exploited and all your bitcoins to be stolen, I don&amp;#39;t think the fact that the bug being in the language runtime is going to be much consolation. Especially if the software you were running was advertised as formally verified as free of bugs. Secondly, I did find a bug in the algorithm. in Archive.lean, in the parsing of…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters also highlight that formal verification is limited by the difficulty of accurately capturing human intent in specifications and the impossibility of proving a total absence of bugs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47759898&quot; title=&quot;I’ve had similar experiences with code I’ve proven correct, although my issues were of the more common variety than the overflow issue - subtle spec bugs.  (I think the post mentions the denial of service issue as related to this: a spec gap) If you have a spec that isn’t correct, you can certainly write code that conforms to that spec and write proofs to support it.  It just means you have verified a program that does something other than what you intended.  This is one of the harder parts of…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47760305&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ll probably get a lot of hate mail for this but here goes nothing... Despite what many people like to claim, you cannot prove that a program has no bugs. That means proving the absence of bugs, and you cannot prove a negative. The best thing you can do is fail to find a bug, but that doesn&amp;#39;t mean it isn&amp;#39;t there. Before everyone starts blabbing about formal verification, etc., consider this: how do you know that you didn&amp;#39;t make a mistake in your formal verification? IOW, how do you know your…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://aphyr.com/posts/418-the-future-of-everything-is-lies-i-guess-work&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The future of everything is lies, I guess: Work&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (aphyr.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47766550&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;289 points · 219 comments · by aphyr&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Aphyr argues that AI integration in the workplace risks deskilling professionals, consolidating wealth among tech giants, and creating &amp;#34;witchcraft-like&amp;#34; engineering practices where humans manage fickle, dishonest models—all while threatening a massive labor shock that current social safety nets are unprepared to handle. &lt;a href=&quot;https://aphyr.com/posts/418-the-future-of-everything-is-lies-i-guess-work&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Future of Everything is Lies, I Guess: Work    URL Source: https://aphyr.com/posts/418-the-future-of-everything-is-lies-i-guess-work    Markdown Content:  # The Future of Everything is Lies, I Guess: Work    *   [Aphyr](https://aphyr.com/)  *   [About](https://aphyr.com/about)  *   [Blog](https://aphyr.com/posts)  *   [Photos](https://aphyr.com/photos)  *   [Code](http://github.com/aphyr)    # [The Future of Everything is Lies, I Guess:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether AI has reached a technical plateau or is poised for an unpredictable &amp;#34;singularity,&amp;#34; with some arguing that current LLMs have limited headroom while others believe new architectures could still trigger exponential growth &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47767539&quot; title=&quot;The interesting question to me at the moment is whether we are still at the bottom of an exponential takeoff or nearing the top of a sigmoid curve. You can find evidence for both. LLMs probably can&amp;#39;t get another 10 times better. But then, almost literally at any minute, someone could come up with a new architecture that can be 10 times better with the same or fewer resources. LLMs strike me as still leaving a lot on the table. If we&amp;#39;re nearing the  top of a sigmoid curve and are given 10-ish…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47767903&quot; title=&quot;Somewhere around 2005-2007, when people were wondering if the Internet was done, PG was fond of saying &amp;#39;It has decades to run.  Social changes take longer than technical changes.&amp;#39; I think we&amp;#39;re at a similar point with LLMs.  The technical stuff is largely &amp;#39;done&amp;#39; - LLMs have closer to 10% than 10x headroom in how much they will technologically improve, we&amp;#39;ll find ways to make them more efficient and burn fewer GPU cycles, the cost will come down as more entrants mature. But the social changes…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47768419&quot; title=&quot;Why is everyone so damn obsessed with the singularity? You don&amp;#39;t need superintelligence to disrupt humanity. We easily have enough advancement to change the economy dramatically as is. The adoption isn&amp;#39;t there yet.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users report significant productivity gains and improved code homogeneity through AI, others warn of a future dominated by &amp;#34;slop,&amp;#34; propaganda, and the potential collapse of the open internet &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47767903&quot; title=&quot;Somewhere around 2005-2007, when people were wondering if the Internet was done, PG was fond of saying &amp;#39;It has decades to run.  Social changes take longer than technical changes.&amp;#39; I think we&amp;#39;re at a similar point with LLMs.  The technical stuff is largely &amp;#39;done&amp;#39; - LLMs have closer to 10% than 10x headroom in how much they will technologically improve, we&amp;#39;ll find ways to make them more efficient and burn fewer GPU cycles, the cost will come down as more entrants mature. But the social changes…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47768036&quot; title=&quot;You are very strong on the &amp;#39;slop&amp;#39; bias. Why? In managing a large to enterprise sized code base, I experience the opposite. I can guarantee a much more homogenous quality of the code base. It is the opposite of slop I am seeing. And that at a lower cost. Today,I literally made a large and complex migration of all of our endpoints. Took ai 30 minutes, including all frontends using these endpoints. Works flawlessly, debt principal down.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a debate regarding the social perception of leadership; some argue that &amp;#34;CEO-bashing&amp;#34; creates a sense of learned helplessness in young workers, while others maintain that executive decisions to replace humans with AI will inevitably degrade product quality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47767903&quot; title=&quot;Somewhere around 2005-2007, when people were wondering if the Internet was done, PG was fond of saying &amp;#39;It has decades to run.  Social changes take longer than technical changes.&amp;#39; I think we&amp;#39;re at a similar point with LLMs.  The technical stuff is largely &amp;#39;done&amp;#39; - LLMs have closer to 10% than 10x headroom in how much they will technologically improve, we&amp;#39;ll find ways to make them more efficient and burn fewer GPU cycles, the cost will come down as more entrants mature. But the social changes…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47766779&quot; title=&quot;Thank you for this aphyr. My one ask is people seem to put “CEOs” on a pedestal any time things come up, like they’re an alien life form and oh no they’re going to do something terrible. There are good company executives and shitty ones. You should try to start a company and see if you can be one of the better ones.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47766953&quot; title=&quot;Class warfare generalizations have become the safe outlet for internet rage because going after CEOs and billionaires is most “punching up” construction that is generally relatable. An unintended side effect that I’ve noticed is that it normalizes bad behavior of CEOs for those who invest a lot of “CEOs bad” grist (Reddit, Threads, even Hacker News). When someone, usually early career, takes a job with a bad CEO after years of reading “CEOs bad” content online, they can go into a learned…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/8250/all-info&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;US national level OS-level age verification bill proposed&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (congress.gov)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47772203&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;218 points · 223 comments · by cft&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A new U.S. House bill proposes requiring operating systems to implement age verification at the device level to restrict minors&amp;#39; access to certain online content and platforms. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/8250/all-info&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;social.coop&amp;amp;#x2F;@cwebber&amp;amp;#x2F;116408556882122186&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;social.coop&amp;amp;#x2F;@cwebber&amp;amp;#x2F;116408556882122186&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely view the proposed bill as a technically illiterate and unconstitutional overreach that could lead to absurd scenarios where legally independent minors are barred from basic digital tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47772397&quot; title=&quot;Its going to be funny when there are married 17 year olds driving cars with guns and children but who can&amp;#39;t install linux or access facebook without calling their dad. Why are so many bi-partisan bills so bad?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47778954&quot; title=&quot;Looks like compelled speech to me, both for the operating system creator and the users. I do not believe that “interstate commerce” powers negate the first amendment.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47772445&quot; title=&quot;What if the user is another machine? Sorry, my API won’t talk to another API unless it’s old enough to drink. How do we still have no people in government with basic computer literacy?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Many suspect the legislation is driven by dark money and corporate interests, specifically suggesting it may benefit Meta by shifting the regulatory burden onto OS competitors like Apple and Microsoft &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47772515&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d love to know which funds/wealthy individuals are bankrolling this rush of age verification mandates. It&amp;#39;s certainly not a grass roots phenomenon.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47772606&quot; title=&quot;This is being pushed by dark money billionaire PACs and lobbyists all over the world. Techbro feudal lords demand total control, de-anonymization of users, and monetization of such data but sell it as &amp;#39;think of the children&amp;#39; &amp;#39;safety&amp;#39;. It&amp;#39;s also why Flock is popping up to bring Big Mommy while it&amp;#39;s using taxpayer money to force privacy elimination and mass surveillance by continuously tracking innocent people.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47778953&quot; title=&quot;According to a recent CRYPTO-GRAM issue from Schneier, it&amp;#39;s in Meta&amp;#39;s interest to push these regulations as their product isn&amp;#39;t an OS. Their competition (Apple/MS/Google) are OSs though.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant debate regarding the bill&amp;#39;s impact on marginalized groups, with some arguing it will be used to disproportionately censor LGBTQ content under the guise of child safety &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47779015&quot; title=&quot;This is a stupid bill, but how is this an anti-LGBTQ issue?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47779086&quot; title=&quot;Anything that even slightly has to do with LGBTQ people will likely end up getting blocked from children’s eyes, while anything to do with non-LGBTQ people won’t.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47779179&quot; title=&quot;I find it interesting this criticism assumes age-appropriate LGBTQ content isn’t a thing.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.joanwestenberg.com/sometimes-powerful-people-just-do-dumb-shit/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sometimes powerful people just do dumb shit&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (joanwestenberg.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47760750&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;271 points · 155 comments · by zdw&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Joan Westenberg argues that the public often mistakenly attributes &amp;#34;4D chess&amp;#34; brilliance to the impulsive, ego-driven blunders of powerful figures like Napoleon, Elon Musk, and Sam Altman, rather than accepting that high-status individuals frequently make simple, catastrophic mistakes. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.joanwestenberg.com/sometimes-powerful-people-just-do-dumb-shit/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Sometimes powerful people just do dumb shit    URL Source: https://www.joanwestenberg.com/sometimes-powerful-people-just-do-dumb-shit/    Published Time: 2026-04-13T06:01:21.000Z    Markdown Content:  # Sometimes powerful people just do dumb shit    [&amp;gt; Westenberg.](https://www.joanwestenberg.com/)[MENU][1. About](https://www.joanwestenberg.com/about/)[2. Self](https://www.thisisstudioself.com/)[3. RSS](https://www.joanwestenberg.com/rss/)[4. Tools](https://studioself.gumroad.com/)[5.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether the actions of powerful figures are calculated &amp;#34;4D chess&amp;#34; or simply human fallibility, with some arguing that we mistakenly attribute deep genius or evil to what is often just banal stupidity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47761717&quot; title=&quot;I kind of feel like people know how to human, and how the humans around them human, but someone they&amp;#39;ve never met but only heard about or seen on TV or in meme posts? No clue at all. Sure, we know the hotshot CEO of COMPANY_NAME_HERE has to put on his pants one leg at a time, but the similarity ends there. They&amp;#39;re different, they won&amp;#39;t fall for the stupid tricks we fall for. They don&amp;#39;t have trouble getting out of bed or ever worry about what their kids are up to. They have CEO spouses that…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47761952&quot; title=&quot;The challenge with the world is that it requires nuance, ad hoc thinking, and effortful thinking. The human brain doesn&amp;#39;t like putting effort into thinking. It&amp;#39;s uncomfortable. It&amp;#39;s easier for us to just have one rule, one heuristic, that we can simply apply to many similar situations. This is why ideology exists and is so powerful. You can always find people chanting the same phrase or slogan, over and over, regardless of the circumstance. Because it&amp;#39;s easier for them to do that than it is for…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters contend that maintaining high-level power requires a lack of a moral compass &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47761798&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Sure, we know the hotshot CEO of COMPANY_NAME_HERE has to put on his pants one leg at a time, but the similarity ends there. That’s probably because we know consciously or subconsciously that in order to get and maintain a position of power at a multibillion dollar firm the person either never had a moral compass or quickly had to find ways to justify ignoring or compromising it. Any one of us who has worked for one of those companies is pretty confident the person running it views other…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that the extreme scrutiny and unique pressures of these roles make mistakes more visible &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762236&quot; title=&quot;Sometimes powerful people just do dumb shit, because they&amp;#39;re still a human being like all of us. It&amp;#39;s easy to look at Musk and say, he&amp;#39;s done some dumb shit when his dumb shit makes news. But very few of us have the same type of scrutiny that powerful people have. He&amp;#39;s done dumb shit, but he&amp;#39;s done a lot of pretty good shit across his lifetime. Nobody is infallible.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762263&quot; title=&quot;I was part of CEO recruitment process (sadly not FAANG-like, so maybe it wasn&amp;#39;t &amp;#39;so much&amp;#39;-level yet). Amount of people who are both seriously willing to take the job(considering pressure) and have necessary skills is not very high. Tbh same is truth for any management job - a lot of competent people prefer calmer life. Obviously for the very top compensation is bonkers and there&amp;#39;s fair share of frauds that ended in the position for various reasons, but if you want someone reasonable pool…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant disagreement regarding specific examples, such as whether Napoleon’s invasion of Russia was a logistical failure or a misunderstood strategic move &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762131&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think the author read even the Wikipedia page on Napoleon&amp;#39;s invasion of Russia? Napoleon _did_ have reasons for attacking Russia, he _did_ prepare logistics. His motives, rationale, and actions are well-documented and widely studied. &amp;gt; watching an unchecked megalomaniac march 685,000 soldiers into a Russian winter without a fur coat in sight Napoleon famously crossed the Neman River in *June*.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762252&quot; title=&quot;If you believe a war with a country the size of Russia will be over within 4 months you might not be a genius.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, and whether Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter was an irredeemable blunder or a high-leeway gamble that may yet yield massive returns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47761757&quot; title=&quot;And how does the price Musk paid for Twitter look now? Sure, maybe it was really a dumb move and he just got lucky. But he&amp;#39;s been lucky a hell of a lot.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47761952&quot; title=&quot;The challenge with the world is that it requires nuance, ad hoc thinking, and effortful thinking. The human brain doesn&amp;#39;t like putting effort into thinking. It&amp;#39;s uncomfortable. It&amp;#39;s easier for us to just have one rule, one heuristic, that we can simply apply to many similar situations. This is why ideology exists and is so powerful. You can always find people chanting the same phrase or slogan, over and over, regardless of the circumstance. Because it&amp;#39;s easier for them to do that than it is for…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tobru.ch/an-ai-vibe-coding-horror-story/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;An AI Vibe Coding Horror Story&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tobru.ch)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762901&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;213 points · 211 comments · by teichmann&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A medical professional used AI coding agents to build a custom patient management system that inadvertently exposed sensitive, unencrypted data and voice recordings to the open internet due to a total lack of security controls. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tobru.ch/an-ai-vibe-coding-horror-story/&quot; title=&quot;Title: An AI Vibe Coding Horror Story    URL Source: https://www.tobru.ch/an-ai-vibe-coding-horror-story/    Published Time: 2026-03-28T12:37:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  # An AI Vibe Coding Horror Story    [![Image 1: Tobias Brunner aka tobru](https://www.tobru.ch/content/images/2024/03/ghost-publication-1.png)](https://www.tobru.ch/)[![Image 2: Tobias Brunner aka tobru](https://www.tobru.ch/content/images/2024/03/ghost-publication-dark-1.png)](https://www.tobru.ch/)    - [x] Menu toggle button     *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion is divided over the authenticity of the &amp;#34;vibe coding&amp;#34; horror story, with some users dismissing it as vague internet fiction or a result of human negligence rather than AI failure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47763136&quot; title=&quot;This reads like internet fiction to me. Very vague and short.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47763282&quot; title=&quot;yeah keeping it vague makes sense to protect the place if it&amp;#39;s still online but the whole thing doesn&amp;#39;t really make sense? The timelines mentioned are weird - he spoke to them before they built it? Or after? It&amp;#39;s not that clear, he mentions they mentioned watching a video. &amp;gt; The entire application was a single HTML file with all JavaScript, CSS, and structure written inline. This is not my experience of how agents tend to build at all. I often _ask_ them to do that, but their tendency is to use…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47763289&quot; title=&quot;Don&amp;#39;t blame the AI for what is clearly gross human negligence. It&amp;#39;s like renovating your entire house and then acting surprised when the pipes burst because you used duct tape as a permanent fix.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that software engineering requires professional accreditation and standards similar to civil engineering to prevent such security lapses &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47763198&quot; title=&quot;Software engineering is looking more and more like it needs a professional body in each country, and accreditation and standards. Ie it needs to grow up and become like every other strand of engineering. Gone should be the days of “I taught myself so now I can [design software in a professional setting / design a bridge in a professional setting].” I’m not advocating gatekeeping - if you want to build a small bridge at the end of your garden for personal use, go for it. If you want to build a…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47763331&quot; title=&quot;There’s a reason why many professions have professional bodies and consolidated standards - from medicine to accountancy, actuarial work, civil engineering, aerospace, electronic and electrical engineering, law, surveying, and so many more. In most of those professions, it is a crime or a civil violation to offer services without the proper qualifications, experience and accreditation from one of the appropriate professional bodies. We DO NOT have this in software engineering. At all. Anyone…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that professional bodies act as rent-seeking gatekeepers and that existing laws already cover these issues &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47763250&quot; title=&quot;Professional bodies act as nothing more then gatekeepers and rent seekers for things of this nature. Anyone can write software, but not everyone writes security minded software. We already have laws in place, and certifications that help someone understand if a given organization adheres to given standards. We can argue over their validity, efficacy, or value. The infrastructure, laws, and framework exist for this. More regulation and beaurocracy doesn&amp;#39;t help when current state isn&amp;#39;t enforced.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable anecdotes include a user reporting a Spanish insurance company to data protection authorities after discovering they had &amp;#34;vibecoded&amp;#34; a CRM with similar vulnerabilities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47763075&quot; title=&quot;I did something similar to a local company here in Spain. Not medical, but a small insurance company. Believe it or not, yes, they vibecoded their CRM. I sent them an email and they threatened to sue me. I was a bit in shock from such dumb response, but I guess some people only learn the hard way, so I filed a report to the AEPD (Data protection agency in Spain) for starters, known to be brutal. I&amp;#39;ve also sent them a burofax demanding the removal of my data on their systems just last friday.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2976-601X/ae4f6b&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;40% of lost calories globally are from beef, needing 33 cal of feed per 1 cal&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (iopscience.iop.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769183&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;157 points · &lt;strong&gt;266 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by randycupertino&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Global food system efficiency declined between 2010 and 2020, with only half of cropland calories reaching humans directly as food. This inefficiency is primarily driven by livestock feed and biofuels, with beef production alone accounting for 36% of feed calories while returning only 9.1% as edible food. &lt;a href=&quot;https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2976-601X/ae4f6b&quot; title=&quot;Title: Only half of the calories produced on croplands are available as food for human consumption    URL Source: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2976-601X/ae4f6b    Markdown Content:  2976-601X/3/2/021001    ## Abstract    To feed a growing population, it is essential that the global agri-food system be managed to efficiently convert crop production into calories for human consumption. Here, we quantify the impact of how 50 crops are used—for food, livestock feed, biofuels, and other…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether global food production capacity is a genuine crisis, with several commenters arguing that current shortages are actually failures of logistics, energy supply, and regulation rather than a lack of resources &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769535&quot; title=&quot;Not trying to be overly flippant... who cares? The paper opens with &amp;#39;to feed a growing population&amp;#39; without asking is that what we need? want? where we are actually heading to? Is feeding the world a real problem? I&amp;#39;ve yet to see compelling evidence that it really is except as a secondary effect of logistics, energy supply, and war. edit: I understand the environmental impacts. I think we should solve our energy problems first.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769628&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Is feeding the world a real problem? Yes, but it is not a production capacity problem. The constraints on food are mostly in the logistics chain, often having to do with corruption or distribution targets (food goes where the money is), or regulation (did you know that cherry growers in the Upper Midwest are required --_by Federal law_-- to destroy unsold crops?). A huge amount of food goes to waste simply because of regulation or subsidies, at least within the United States.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769610&quot; title=&quot;Exactly.  The current world population is 8.3 billion and is expected to peak at 10.3 billion in 2080 and then begin declining.  Now, there are a number of other reasons we might have food shortages, but population per se I don&amp;#39;t think is a significant factor.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest that market forces and cheap energy will naturally resolve these issues &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769650&quot; title=&quot;Agreed. The market should decide if beef consumption is viable. Ultimately energy is the basis all food production. Cheap and plentiful energy solves the food production and distribution problem, then its just matter of preferences.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769945&quot; title=&quot;This is stupid thinking indulged in by westerners who were born in the lap of luxury. The market is incredibly moral. When my dad was born in a village in Bangladesh, 1 out of 4 kids didn’t live past age 5. Thanks to market reforms and the resulting economic growth, child mortality in Bangladesh has plummeted. Bangladesh’s under-5 morality rate is better today than America’s was at the same time my dad was born. If India and Bangladesh hadn’t fucked around with socialism for decades after…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that markets prioritize the wealthy at the expense of the global poor and the environment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769773&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The market should decide if beef consumption is viable The market has decided, ant it decided that the well off are more important than the rest so they get what they want at everyone elses expense. Maybe we should stop thinking market forces are in any way right or moral. At least saying &amp;#39;I got mine, fuck you&amp;#39; would be honest.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769925&quot; title=&quot;Even if food shortages aren&amp;#39;t an issue, reducing the amount of land dedicated to food production is a win for ecosystems. Not saying people have to go vegetarian, but reducing meat consumption or using more efficiently produced meats (in terms of land use) would overall make the world a nicer and more interesting place. And, really, with the whole neu5gc thing, it might be that humans would be better off focusing on chickens and seafood anyway (clams being a pretty good option for seafood that…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is notable interest in the efficiency of chicken and legumes over beef, though some defend the practice of overproduction and crop destruction as a necessary buffer against potential supply shocks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769551&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If excess beef consumption were reduced to healthy quantities, as defined by the EAT-Lancet healthy reference diet, and substituted with chicken in forty-eight higher-income countries, the lost calories avoided would be enough to meet the caloric needs of 850 million people. It&amp;#39;s really impressive how efficient chickens are compared to beef. Obviously thinks like legumes are way more efficient, but we&amp;#39;ve really bred chickens to be meat machines in a way we haven&amp;#39;t with cows.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769808&quot; title=&quot;This is for good reason though. You want to overproduce significantly in ordinary times so that if there is a big negative shock you will still be able to produce enough to feed everyone merely by not destroying the excess anymore.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769834&quot; title=&quot;There is no reason to obliterate food, you should give it away to those in need.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/openssl/openssl/releases/tag/openssl-4.0.0&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OpenSSL 4.0.0&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47768788&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;280 points · 86 comments · by petecooper&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenSSL has officially released version 4.0.0, marking a major new update for the open-source cryptography and TLS library. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/openssl/openssl/releases/tag/openssl-4.0.0&quot; title=&quot;Title: Release OpenSSL 4.0.0 · openssl/openssl    URL Source: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/releases/tag/openssl-4.0.0    Markdown Content:  # Release OpenSSL 4.0.0 · openssl/openssl · GitHub    [Skip to content](https://github.com/openssl/openssl/releases/tag/openssl-4.0.0#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [](https://github.com/)    [Sign in](https://github.com/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fopenssl%2Fopenssl%2Freleases%2Ftag%2Fopenssl-4.0.0)    Appearance…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of OpenSSL 4.0.0 has sparked excitement for its native Encrypted Client Hello (ECH) support &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47769120&quot; title=&quot;Finally encrypted client hello support \o/&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, though users note that ECH&amp;#39;s privacy benefits are limited for individual servers where IP addresses still leak identity; its primary value lies in large-scale cloud hosting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47770041&quot; title=&quot;Nginx mainline 1.29.x supports it.  So once you get that and also the openssl version on your system, good to go.  Likely too late for ubuntu 26.04, maybe in debian 14 next year, or of course rolling release distros / containers. But, in a personal/single website server, ech does not really add privacy, adversaries can still observe the IP metadata and compare what&amp;#39;s hosted there. The real benefits are on huge cloud hosting platforms.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47772051&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not that adversaries can directly see the domain name; this doesn&amp;#39;t have anything to do with domain fronting. The issue is that ECH doesn&amp;#39;t hide the server&amp;#39;s IP address, so it&amp;#39;s mostly useless for privacy if that IP address uniquely identifies that server. The situation where it helps is if the server shares that IP address with lots of other people, i.e., if it&amp;#39;s behind a big cloud CDN that supports ECH (AFAIK that&amp;#39;s currently just Cloudflare). But if that&amp;#39;s the case, it doesn&amp;#39;t matter…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47772246&quot; title=&quot;I can&amp;#39;t speak for anyone else but I think I can work around that by moving the site around to different VPS nodes from time to time.  I get bored with my silly hobby sites all the time and nuke the VM&amp;#39;s then fire them up later which gives them a new IP.  I don&amp;#39;t know what others might do if anything. If I had a long running site I could do the same thing by having multiple font-end caching nodes using HAProxy or NGinx that come and go but I acknowledge others may not have the time to do that…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite this milestone, significant criticism remains regarding the library&amp;#39;s architecture, with developers arguing that the transition to OpenSSL 3.x introduced severe performance regressions and a &amp;#34;terrible&amp;#34; developer experience due to complex, dynamic API designs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47770284&quot; title=&quot;It’s still terrible. There was a brief period immediately after Heartbleed that it was rapidly improving but the entire OpenSSL 3 was a huge disappointment to anyone who cared about performance and complexity and developer experience (ergonomics). Core operations in OpenSSL 3 are still much much slower than in OpenSSL 1.1.1. The HAProxy people wrote a very good blog post on the state of SSL stacks: https://www.haproxy.com/blog/state-of-ssl-stacks And the Python cryptography people wrote an even…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While modern web servers like Nginx are already integrating these features &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47770041&quot; title=&quot;Nginx mainline 1.29.x supports it.  So once you get that and also the openssl version on your system, good to go.  Likely too late for ubuntu 26.04, maybe in debian 14 next year, or of course rolling release distros / containers. But, in a personal/single website server, ech does not really add privacy, adversaries can still observe the IP metadata and compare what&amp;#39;s hosted there. The real benefits are on huge cloud hosting platforms.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47771277&quot; title=&quot;FWIW Nginx 1.30 [1] just released and supports it so most distributions will have support as soon as those responsible for builds and testing builds push it forward. &amp;#39;Nginx 1.30 incorporates all of the changes from the Nginx 1.29.x mainline branch to provide a lot of new functionality like Multipath TCP (MPTCP).&amp;#39; &amp;#39;Nginx 1.30 also adds HTTP/2 to backend and Encrypted Client Hello (ECH), sticky sessions support for upstreams, and the default proxy HTTP version being set to HTTP/1.1 with…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, some warn that &amp;#34;reasonable&amp;#34; networks may block ECH traffic entirely &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47770383&quot; title=&quot;Just be aware any reasonable network will block this.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47770788&quot; title=&quot;Why is it &amp;#39;reasonable&amp;#39; to block it?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lisyarus.github.io/blog/posts/its-ok-to-compare-floating-points-for-equality.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;It&amp;#39;s OK to compare floating-points for equality&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lisyarus.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47767398&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;210 points · 136 comments · by coinfused&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that while &amp;#34;epsilon-comparisons&amp;#34; are often used to handle floating-point inaccuracies, they are frequently arbitrary hacks that can be replaced by more robust, deterministic logic or exact equality checks by understanding IEEE 754 standards and specific algorithmic requirements. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lisyarus.github.io/blog/posts/its-ok-to-compare-floating-points-for-equality.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: It&amp;#39;s OK to compare floating-points for equality    URL Source: https://lisyarus.github.io/blog/posts/its-ok-to-compare-floating-points-for-equality.html    Markdown Content:  It&amp;#39;s OK to compare floating-points for equality    2026 Apr 14  _NB: The title of this post is an intentional clickbait. Even though I do stand for its statement, a more honest one would be something like: It&amp;#39;s NOT OK to compare floating-points using epsilons._    You&amp;#39;ve probably heard the mantra that you must never compare…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights that standard floating-point epsilon is frequently misused, as it only represents the gap between values near 1.0 and fails to account for how precision scales with magnitude &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815067&quot; title=&quot;I guess I&amp;#39;m confused. I thought epsilon was the smallest possible value to account for accuracy drift across the range of a floating point representation, not just &amp;#39;1e-4&amp;#39;. Done some reading. Thanks to the article to waking me up to this fact at least. I didn&amp;#39;t realize that the epsilon provided by languages tends to be the one that only works around 1.0, and if you want to use episilons globally (which the article would say is generally a bad idea) you need to be more dynamic as your ranges, and…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815131&quot; title=&quot;Is there any constant more misused in compsci than ieee epsilon? :) It&amp;#39;s defined as the difference between 1.0 and the smallest number larger than 1.0. More usefully, it&amp;#39;s the spacing between adjacent representable float numbers in the range 1.0 to 2.0. Because floats get less precise at every integer power of two, it&amp;#39;s impossible for two numbers greater than or equal to 2.0 to be epsilon apart. The spacing between 2.0 and the next larger number is 2*epsilon. That means `abs(a - b) &amp;lt;= epsilon`…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest bit-casting to integers or using radians over degrees to preserve precision &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47775091&quot; title=&quot;There is another way to compare floats for rough equality that I haven&amp;#39;t seen much explored anywhere: bit-cast to integer, strip few least significant bits and then compare for equality.  This is agnostic to magnitude, unlike epsilon which has to be tuned for range of values you expect to get a meaningful result.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815963&quot; title=&quot;I remember having convincing a few coworkers that the number of distinct floating point values between 0.0 and 1.0 is the same as the number of values between 1.0 and infinity. They must not be teaching this properly anymore. Are there no longer courses that explain the basics of floating point representation? I was arguing that we could squeeze a tiny bit more precision out of our angle types by storing angles in radians (range: -π to π) instead of degrees (range: -180 to 180) because when…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, experts in computational geometry argue that the problem of &amp;#34;fuzzy&amp;#34; equality is fundamentally unsolvable due to inexact inputs and topological validity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815349&quot; title=&quot;This explanation is relatively reductive when it comes to its criticism of computational geometry. The thing with computational geometry is, that its usually someone else&amp;#39;s geometry , i.e you have no control over its quality or intention. In other words, whether two points or planes or lines actually align or align within 1e-4 is no longer really mathematically interesting because its all about the intention of the user : does the user think these planes overlap?. This is why most geometry…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815811&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This is why most geometry kernels (see open cascade) sport things like &amp;#39;fuzzy boolean operations&amp;#39; [0]) that lean into epsilons. These epsilons mask the error-prone supply chain of these meshes that arrive in your program by allowing some tolerance. They don’t just lean into epsilons, the session context tolerance is used for almost every single point classification operation in geometric kernels and many primitives carry their own accumulating error component for downstream math. Even then…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Consequently, production geometric kernels often rely on complex tolerance expansion and &amp;#34;fuzzy&amp;#34; operations to mask these inherent errors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815349&quot; title=&quot;This explanation is relatively reductive when it comes to its criticism of computational geometry. The thing with computational geometry is, that its usually someone else&amp;#39;s geometry , i.e you have no control over its quality or intention. In other words, whether two points or planes or lines actually align or align within 1e-4 is no longer really mathematically interesting because its all about the intention of the user : does the user think these planes overlap?. This is why most geometry…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815811&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This is why most geometry kernels (see open cascade) sport things like &amp;#39;fuzzy boolean operations&amp;#39; [0]) that lean into epsilons. These epsilons mask the error-prone supply chain of these meshes that arrive in your program by allowing some tolerance. They don’t just lean into epsilons, the session context tolerance is used for almost every single point classification operation in geometric kernels and many primitives carry their own accumulating error component for downstream math. Even then…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://introspective-diffusion.github.io/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introspective Diffusion Language Models&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (introspective-diffusion.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762641&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;280 points · 55 comments · by zagwdt&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Introspective Diffusion Language Model (I-DLM) is the first diffusion-based model to match the quality of same-scale autoregressive counterparts, using a new &amp;#34;introspective strided decoding&amp;#34; method to verify and generate tokens simultaneously for up to 4.1x higher throughput. &lt;a href=&quot;https://introspective-diffusion.github.io/&quot; title=&quot;Title: I-DLM: Introspective Diffusion Language Models    URL Source: https://introspective-diffusion.github.io/    Published Time: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 03:07:08 GMT    Markdown Content:  # I-DLM: Introspective Diffusion Language…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a significant breakthrough in turning autoregressive models into diffusion language models (dLLMs), achieving competitive performance with the base model while doubling generation speeds &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47763374&quot; title=&quot;If I’m reading this right, this is pretty wild. They turned a Qwen autoregressor into a diffuser by using a bunch of really clever techniques, and they vastly outperform any “native diffuser,” actually being competitive with the base model they were trained from. The obvious upside here is the massive speedup in generation. And then through a LoRA adapter, you can ground the diffuser  on the base model’s distribution (essentially have it “compare” its proposals against what the base model…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Users report that dLLMs like Mercury 2 offer frictionless latency for UX experiments such as note-tagging and autocomplete, though they still struggle with tool-calling accuracy compared to established models like Haiku &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47764313&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve found the latency and pricing make Mercury 2 extremely compelling for some UX experiments focused around automated note tagging/interlinking. Far more than the Gemini Flash Lite I used before, it made some interactions nearly frictionless, very close to how old school autocomplete/T9/autocorrect works in a manner that users don&amp;#39;t even think about the processes behind it. Sadly, it does not perform at the level of e.g. Haiku 3.5 for tool calling, despite their own benchmarks claiming parity…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762877&quot; title=&quot;https://www.inceptionlabs.ai/ This startup seems to have been at it a while. From our look into it - amazing speed, but challenges remain around time-to-first-token user experience and overall answer quality. Can absolutely see this working if we can get the speed and accuracy up to that “good enough” position for cheaper models - or non-user facing async work. One other question I’ve had is wondering if it’s possible to actually set a huge amount of text to diffuse as the output - using a…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While the speed and potential for &amp;#34;byte-for-byte&amp;#34; output parity are exciting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47763374&quot; title=&quot;If I’m reading this right, this is pretty wild. They turned a Qwen autoregressor into a diffuser by using a bunch of really clever techniques, and they vastly outperform any “native diffuser,” actually being competitive with the base model they were trained from. The obvious upside here is the massive speedup in generation. And then through a LoRA adapter, you can ground the diffuser  on the base model’s distribution (essentially have it “compare” its proposals against what the base model…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, skeptics question the practical trade-offs regarding time-to-first-token (TTFT) and whether the quality is yet &amp;#34;good enough&amp;#34; for complex tasks like coding &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762877&quot; title=&quot;https://www.inceptionlabs.ai/ This startup seems to have been at it a while. From our look into it - amazing speed, but challenges remain around time-to-first-token user experience and overall answer quality. Can absolutely see this working if we can get the speed and accuracy up to that “good enough” position for cheaper models - or non-user facing async work. One other question I’ve had is wondering if it’s possible to actually set a huge amount of text to diffuse as the output - using a…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47763085&quot; title=&quot;The overall speed rather than TTFT might start to be more relevant as the caller moves from being a human to another model. However quality is really important. I tried that site and clicked one of their examples, &amp;#39;create a javascript animation&amp;#39;. Fast response, but while it starts like this ```  Below is a self‑contained HTML + CSS + JavaScript example that creates a simple, smooth animation: a colorful ball bounces around the browser window while leaving a fading trail behind it. JavaScript…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also emerging interest in whether diffusion can be used for iterative reasoning by passing outputs back through the model for introspection &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47763659&quot; title=&quot;Can diffusion models have reasoning steps where they generate a block, introspect and then generate another until the output is satisfactory?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47763802&quot; title=&quot;Well, you can take the output of a first pass and pass it back through the model like AR “reasoning” models do at inference time.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-04-13</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-04-13</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://anchor.host/someone-bought-30-wordpress-plugins-and-planted-a-backdoor-in-all-of-them/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Someone bought 30 WordPress plugins and planted a backdoor in all of them&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (anchor.host)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47755629&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1194 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 340 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A malicious buyer acquired a portfolio of over 30 WordPress plugins and planted a sophisticated backdoor that remained dormant for eight months before injecting SEO spam via `wp-config.php`. WordPress.org has since closed the affected plugins, which include popular tools like Countdown Timer Ultimate and Popup Anything on Click. &lt;a href=&quot;https://anchor.host/someone-bought-30-wordpress-plugins-and-planted-a-backdoor-in-all-of-them/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Someone Bought 30 WordPress Plugins and Planted a Backdoor in All of Them.    URL Source: https://anchor.host/someone-bought-30-wordpress-plugins-and-planted-a-backdoor-in-all-of-them/    Published Time: 2026-04-09T07:00:00-04:00    Markdown Content:  Last week, I wrote about catching a supply chain attack on a WordPress plugin called Widget Logic. A trusted name, acquired by a new owner, turned into something malicious. It happened again. This time at a much larger scale.    30+    Plugins…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The incident highlights a critical vulnerability in modern software where attackers can simply purchase dependencies or bribe employees to insert backdoors, a tactic fueled by the massive financial incentives of cryptocurrency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47756259&quot; title=&quot;This is a perfect illustration of what cracks me up about the hyperbolic reactions to Mythos. Yes, increased automation of cutting-edge vulnerability discovery will shake things up a bit. No, it&amp;#39;s nowhere near the top of what should be keeping you awake at night if you&amp;#39;re working in infosec. We&amp;#39;ve built our existing tech stacks and corporate governance structures for a different era. If you want to credit one specific development for making things dramatically worse, it&amp;#39;s cryptocurrencies, not…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47756349&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; And with this much at stake, they can afford to simply buy your software dependencies, or to offer one of your employees some retirement money in exchange for making a &amp;#39;mistake&amp;#39;. LAPSUS$ was prolific by just bribing employees with admin access. This is far from theoretical. Just imagine the kind of money your average nation state has laying around to bribe someone with internal access.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters argue that the industry&amp;#39;s reliance on massive trees of unvetted transitive dependencies makes supply chain attacks nearly inevitable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47755991&quot; title=&quot;Whenever I look at a web project, it starts with &amp;#39;npm install&amp;#39; and literally dozens of libraries get downloaded. The project authors probably don&amp;#39;t even know what libraries their project requires, because many of them are transitive dependencies. There is zero chance that they have checked those libraries for supply chain attacks.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47756125&quot; title=&quot;There is a reason. The prevailing wisdom has thus far been: &amp;#39;don&amp;#39;t re-invent the wheel&amp;#39;, or it non-HN equivalent &amp;#39;there is an app for that&amp;#39;. I am absolutely not suggesting everyone should be rolling their own crypto, but there must be a healthy middle ground between that and a library that lets you pick font color.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47757103&quot; title=&quot;For exactly this reason, when I write software, I go out of my way to avoid using external packages. For example, I recently wrote a tool in Python to synchronize weather-statation data to a local database. [1] It took only a little more effort to use the Python standard library to manage the downloads, as opposed to using an external package such as Requests [2], but the result is that I have no dependencies beyond what already comes with Python. I like the peace of mind that comes from not…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate whether &amp;#34;bug-free&amp;#34; software is even possible, others contend that we possess the technical tools to achieve high quality but consistently prioritize speed and cost over security &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47757463&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; We know how to write software with very few bugs (although we often choose not to) Do we, really? Because a week doesn’t go by when I don’t run into bugs of some sort. Be it in PrimeVue (even now the components occasionally have bugs, seems like they’re putting out new major versions but none are truly stable and bug free) or Vue (their SFC did not play nicely with complex TS types), or the greater npm ecosystem, or Spring Boot or Java in general, or Oracle drivers, or whatever unlucky thread…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47757644&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; No matter where I look, up and down the stack, across different OSes and tech stacks, there are bugs. I’m not sure I’d go quite as far as GP, but they did caveat that we often choose not to write software with few bugs. And empirically, that’s pretty true. The software I’ve written for myself or where I’ve taken the time to do things better or rewrite parts I wasn’t happy with have had remarkably few bugs. I have critical software still running—unmodified—at former employers which hasn’t been…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47757834&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I’m not sure I’d go quite as far as GP, but they did caveat that we often choose not to write software with few bugs. And empirically, that’s pretty true. Blame PMs for this. Delivering by some arbitrary date on a calendar means that something is getting shipped regardless of quality. Make it functional for 80% of use, then we&amp;#39;ll fix the remaining bits in releases. However, that doesn&amp;#39;t happen as the team is assigned new task because new tasks/features is what brings in new users, not fixing…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47757575&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Do we, really? Yes, or pretty close to it. What we don&amp;#39;t know how to do (AFAIK) is do it at a cost that would be acceptable for most software. So yes, it mostly gets done for (components of) planes, spacecraft, medical devices, etc. Totally agreed that most software is a morass of bugs. But giving examples of buggy software doesn&amp;#39;t provide any information about whether we know how to make non-buggy software. It only provides information about whether we know how to make buggy software—spoiler…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.github.com/gh-stack/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GitHub Stacked PRs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47757495&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;898 points · 524 comments · by ezekg&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GitHub has introduced Stacked PRs in private preview, featuring a new CLI and native UI support to help developers break large changes into a chain of small, independently reviewable pull requests that can be merged together. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.github.com/gh-stack/&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub Stacked PRs    URL Source: https://github.github.com/gh-stack/    Published Time: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 07:40:02 GMT    Markdown Content:  # GitHub Stacked PRs | GitHub Stacked PRs  [Skip to content](https://github.github.com/gh-stack/#_top)    [GitHub Stacked PRs](https://github.github.com/gh-stack/)    Search Ctrl K     Cancel     [Overview](https://github.github.com/gh-stack/introduction/overview/)[Quick…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The introduction of stacked PRs on GitHub aims to replicate the Phabricator and Mercurial workflow, which proponents argue makes reviewing large features more manageable by breaking them into smaller, logical chunks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47757695&quot; title=&quot;As someone who used phabricator and mercurial, using GitHub and git again feels like going back to the stone ages. Hopefully this and jujutsu can recreate stacked-diff flow of phabricator. It’s not just nice for monorepos. It makes both reviewing and working on long-running feature projects so much nicer. It encourages smaller PRs or diffs so that reviews are quick and easy to do in between builds (whereas long pull requests take a big chunk of time).&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47758050&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s basically trying to bring the stacked diff workflow pioneered by Phabricator to GitHub. The idea is that it allows you to better handle working on top of stuff that&amp;#39;s not merged yet, and makes it easier for reviewers to review pieces of a larger stack of work independently. It&amp;#39;s really useful in larger corporate environments. I&amp;#39;ve used stacked PRs when doing things like upgrading react-native in a monorepo. It required a massive amount of changes, and would be really hard to review as a…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find the concept redundant or confusing compared to reviewing individual commits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47757981&quot; title=&quot;I might be missing something, but what I need is not &amp;#39;stacked PR&amp;#39; but a proper UI and interface to manage single commit: - merge some commits independently when partial work is ready. - mark some commit as reviewed. - UI to do interactive rebase and and squash and edit individual commits. (I can do that well from the command line, but not when using the GitHub interface, and somehow not everyone from my team is familiar with that) - ability to attach a comment to a specific commit, or to the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47758232&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; a chain of small, focused pull requests that build on each other — each one independently reviewable. I have never understood what this even means. Either changes are orthogonal (and can be merged independently), or they’re not. If they are, they can each be their own PR. If they’re not, why do you want to review them independently? If you reject change A and approve change B, nothing can merge, because B needs A to proceed. If you approve change A and reject change B, then the feature is…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others highlight that current GitHub UX makes manual stacking difficult due to merge conflicts and target branch issues &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47758067&quot; title=&quot;Does it fix the current UX issue with Squash &amp;amp; Merge? Right now I manually do &amp;#39;stacked PRs&amp;#39; like this: main &amp;lt;- PR A &amp;lt;- PR B (PR B&amp;#39;s merge target branch is PR A) &amp;lt;- PR C, etc. If PR B merges first, PR A can merge to main no problems. If PR A merges to main first, fixing PR B is a nightmare. The GitHub UI automatically changes the &amp;#39;target&amp;#39; branch of the PR to main, but instantly conflicts spawn from nowhere. Try to rebase it and you&amp;#39;re going to be manually looking at every non-conflicting change…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite Git&amp;#39;s dominance and speed, there is a lingering debate over whether its API is inferior to Mercurial&amp;#39;s, leading to the rise of tools like `jujutsu` to bridge the gap &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47758017&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m so glad git won the dvcs war. There was a solid decade where mercurial kept promoting itself as &amp;#39;faster than git*†‡&amp;#39; and every time I tried it wound up being dog slow (always) or broken (some of the time). Git is fugly but it&amp;#39;s fast, reliable, and fugly, and I can work with that.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47758213&quot; title=&quot;Mercurial has a strictly superior API. The issue is solely that OG Mercurial was written in Python. Git is super mid. It’s a shame that Git and GitHub are so dominant that VCS tooling has stagnated. It could be so so so much better!&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47758302&quot; title=&quot;What is kind of funny here is that you&amp;#39;re right locally. At the same time, the larger tech companies (Meta and Google, specifically) ended up building off of hg and not git because (at the time, especially) git cannot scale up to their use cases. So while the git CLI was super fast, and the hg CLI was slow, &amp;#39;performance&amp;#39; means more than just CLI speed. I was never a fan of hg either, but now I can use jj, and get some of those benefits without actually using it directly.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21852&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;All elementary functions from a single binary operator&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (arxiv.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47746610&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;854 points · 294 comments · by pizza&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Researcher Andrzej Odrzywołek has identified a single binary operator, $eml(x,y) = \exp(x) - \ln(y)$, that can generate all standard elementary functions and constants, enabling a uniform tree-based structure for symbolic regression and scientific computation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21852&quot; title=&quot;Title: All elementary functions from a single binary operator    URL Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21852    Published Time: Tue, 07 Apr 2026 00:22:12 GMT    Markdown Content:  # [2603.21852] All elementary functions from a single binary operator    [Skip to main content](https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21852#content)    [![Image 1: Cornell University Logo](https://arxiv.org/static/browse/0.3.4/images/icons/cu/cornell-reduced-white-SMALL.svg)](https://www.cornell.edu/)    [Learn about arXiv becoming an…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discovery of a single binary operator (EML) capable of representing all elementary functions is seen as a potentially significant breakthrough for modeling complex data and wave functions via gradient descent &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47747537&quot; title=&quot;EDIT: please change the article link to the most recent version (as of now still v2), it is currently pointing to the v1 version which misses the figures. I&amp;#39;m still reading this, but if this checks out, this is one of the most significant discoveries in years. Why use splines or polynomials or haphazardly chosen basis functions if you can just fit (gradient descent) your data or wave functions to the proper computational EML tree? Got a multidimensional and multivariate function to model (with…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue that while mathematically elegant, the approach suffers from an exponential &amp;#34;expression blow-up&amp;#34;—for instance, simple multiplication requires a depth-8 tree with over 40 leaves—making it computationally inefficient compared to traditional polynomials or NAND-gate logic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47747708&quot; title=&quot;From my experience of working in this problem domain for the last year, I&amp;#39;d say it is pretty powerful but the &amp;#39;too good to be true part&amp;#39; comes from that EML buys elegance through exponential expression blow-up. Multiplication alone requires depth-8 trees with 41+ leaves i.e. minimal operator vocabulary trades off against expression length. There&amp;#39;s likely an information-theoretic sweet spot between these extremes. It&amp;#39;s interesting to see his EML approach whereas mine was more on generating a…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47747619&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Why use splines or polynomials or haphazardly chosen basis functions if you can just fit (gradient descent) your data or wave functions to the proper computational EML tree? Same reason all boolean logic isn&amp;#39;t performed with combinations of NAND – it&amp;#39;s computationally inefficient. Polynomials are (for their expressivity) very quick to compute.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, some note that EML is not unique in its universality, as other binary operators like $1/(x-y)$ can also derive all elementary operations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47756403&quot; title=&quot;This isn&amp;#39;t unique, or even the least compute way to do this. For example, let f(x,y) = 1/(x-y). This too is universal. I think there&amp;#39;s a theorem stating for any finite set of binary operators there is a single one replacing it. write x#y for 1/(x-y). x#0 = 1/(x-0) = 1/x, so you get reciprocals.  Then (x#y)#0 = 1/((1/(x-y)) - 0) = x-y, so subtraction. it&amp;#39;s common problem to show in any (insert various algebraic structure here ) inverse and subtraction gives all 4 elementary ops. I haven&amp;#39;t checked…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users have already begun testing LLMs on their ability to compose EML trees, others remain skeptical of the practical hardware trade-offs compared to traditional math coprocessors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47747150&quot; title=&quot;How would an architecture with a highly-optimized hardware implementation of EML compare with a traditional math coprocessor?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47747965&quot; title=&quot;This makes a good benchmark LLMs: ```  look at this paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.21852 now please produce 2x+y as a composition on EMLs  ``` Opus(paid) - claimed that &amp;#39;2&amp;#39; is circular. Once I told it that ChatGPT have already done this, finished successfully. ChatGPT(free) - did it from the first try. Grok - produced estimation of the depth of the formula. Gemini - success Deepseek - Assumed some pre-existing knowledge on what EML is. Unable to fetch the pdf from the link, unable to consume…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/dangers-californias-legislation-censor-3d-printing&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The dangers of California&amp;#39;s legislation to censor 3D printing&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (eff.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47759420&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;501 points · 469 comments · by salkahfi&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;California bill A.B. 2047 proposes mandating print-blocking algorithms on all 3D printers to prevent the production of firearms, a move critics argue will criminalize open-source software, stifle innovation, and create significant consumer privacy and surveillance risks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/dangers-californias-legislation-censor-3d-printing&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Dangers of California’s Legislation to Censor 3D Printing    URL Source: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/dangers-californias-legislation-censor-3d-printing    Published Time: 2026-04-13T15:07:09-07:00    Markdown Content:  # The Dangers of California’s Legislation to Censor 3D Printing | Electronic Frontier Foundation  [Skip to main content](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/dangers-californias-legislation-censor-3d-printing#main-content)    *   [About](https://www.eff.org/about)     …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that California&amp;#39;s legislation is ineffective because 3D printing is a less reliable method of manufacturing firearms than using metal pipes or purchasing unregulated components like rifled barrels &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47770910&quot; title=&quot;Personally, I see this as an assault on 3d printing more than any real attempt to regulate guns. I own several 3d printers.  If I wanted to make something resembling a firearm I&amp;#39;d go to home depot WAY before I bothered 3d printing parts.  You basically just need a metal tube, and well... a pipe from home depot does that much better than trying to 3d print something much less reliable. So given we don&amp;#39;t do this regulation for any of the much more reliable ways to create unregistered firearms...…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47771522&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; You basically just need a metal tube, and well... a pipe from home depot does that much better than trying to 3d print something much less reliable. Why would you buy a pipe at Home Depot? A gun barrel is not a firearm, and is not required to be registered or serialized. You can drive to Arizona or Nevada and buy an actual barrel, with rifling, manufactured to meet well-known specifications, without showing an ID. Until this year, you could have a barrel shipped to your California residence…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some believe the bill is a genuine, if misguided, attempt by gun control lobbyists to prevent the production of handgun frames and &amp;#34;Glock switches,&amp;#34; others suspect it is driven by gun manufacturers seeking to eliminate competition from a growing cottage industry &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47771522&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; You basically just need a metal tube, and well... a pipe from home depot does that much better than trying to 3d print something much less reliable. Why would you buy a pipe at Home Depot? A gun barrel is not a firearm, and is not required to be registered or serialized. You can drive to Arizona or Nevada and buy an actual barrel, with rifling, manufactured to meet well-known specifications, without showing an ID. Until this year, you could have a barrel shipped to your California residence…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47771628&quot; title=&quot;Like everything in the United States, it’s actually gun manufacturers that want to clamp down on this cottage industry which threatens their profits. I don’t buy for a second that this is some gun control attempt.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47772855&quot; title=&quot;3D gun printing has come a long way in a short amount of time. 3D printed lower receivers can weather several hundred rounds of 7.62 at this point&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics contend the law unfairly targets 3D printing technology and innovators while failing to address the underlying availability of ammunition or the reality of the hundreds of millions of firearms already in national circulation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47770563&quot; title=&quot;Why don&amp;#39;t these bills go after ammo or gunpowder access? Seems as long as you have access to a cylinder, and ammunition, you can make a gun.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47771081&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; any real attempt to regulate guns Any real attempt would need to be at the national level, not that I would advocate for it, but it&amp;#39;s simply a pipe dream to create a &amp;#39;gun free zone&amp;#39; in a country with 100s of millions of firearms. There are plenty of gun enthusiasts in California, they just don&amp;#39;t flaunt it or talk about it.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47770611&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m so glad I left California 6 years ago. They are going to regulate and tax their startups and innovators away to other states. This is supremely stupid.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://adlrocha.substack.com/p/adlrocha-how-the-ai-loser-may-end&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apple&amp;#39;s accidental moat: How the &amp;quot;AI Loser&amp;quot; may end up winning&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (adlrocha.substack.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47747017&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;436 points · 384 comments · by walterbell&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple is emerging as a surprise AI winner by leveraging its &amp;#34;unified memory&amp;#34; chip architecture and vast ecosystem of personal user context to run increasingly commoditized, high-performance open-source models locally on-device, avoiding the massive infrastructure costs and privacy concerns plaguing competitors like OpenAI. &lt;a href=&quot;https://adlrocha.substack.com/p/adlrocha-how-the-ai-loser-may-end&quot; title=&quot;Title: @adlrocha - How the &amp;#39;AI Loser&amp;#39; may end up winning    URL Source: https://adlrocha.substack.com/p/adlrocha-how-the-ai-loser-may-end    Published Time: 2026-04-12T08:12:05+00:00    Markdown Content:  [![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple’s strategy is viewed by some as a classic &amp;#34;leapfrog&amp;#34; approach, waiting for competitors to make sunk investments before architecting a superior, integrated consumer solution &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47747247&quot; title=&quot;This is the classic apple approach - wait to understand what the thing is capable of doing (aka let others make sunk investments), envision a solution that is way better than the competition and then architect a path to building a leapfrog product that builds a large lead.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47747402&quot; title=&quot;Apple aren’t in the business of building chatbots to impress investors (other than some WWDC2024 vaporware they’d rather not talk about any more). They’re in the business of consumer hardware. Consumers want iPhones and (if Apple are right) some form of AR glasses in the next decade. That’s their focus. There’s a huge amount of machine learning and inference that’s required to get those to work. But it’s under the hood and computed locally. Hence their chips.  I don’t see what Apple have to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a growing consensus that local models are rapidly closing the gap with cloud-based AI; if local performance reaches the level of current top-tier models within the next two years, the need for third-party cloud subscriptions may vanish for many users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47747502&quot; title=&quot;Gemma4 in my view is good enough to do things similar to Gemini 2.5 flash, meaning if I point it code and ask for help and there is a problem with the code it’ll answer correctly in terms of suggestions but it’s not great at using all tools or one shooting things that require a lot of context or “expert knowledge” If a couple more iterations of this, say gemma6 is as good as current opus and runs completely locally on a Mac, I won’t really bother with the cloud models. That’s a problem. For the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47747630&quot; title=&quot;Local models seem somewhere between 9 and 24 months behind.  I&amp;#39;m not saying I won&amp;#39;t be impressed with what online models will be able to do in two years, but I&amp;#39;m pretty satisfied with the prediction that I won&amp;#39;t really need them in a couple of years.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. However, skeptics argue that hardware constraints like RAM will limit mobile local AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47747791&quot; title=&quot;We still aren&amp;#39;t going to be putting 200gb ram on a phone in a couple years to run those local models.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, while others criticize Apple for maintaining a &amp;#34;walled garden&amp;#34; that increasingly prioritizes integrated advertising over user experience &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47747789&quot; title=&quot;Consumers don&amp;#39;t necessarily want iPhone. They don&amp;#39;t want to be excluded from iMessage, which is a completely different motivation.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47747474&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t like companies forcing their newest features on me noisily and constantly trying to ship new features and see what sticks so you can&amp;#39;t trust whether a feature advertised one week will even be there the next. However, I have even less patience for companies forcing paid-for third-party ads down my throat on a paid product. Slack at least doesn&amp;#39;t sell my eyeballs. Facebook, Twitter, Google&amp;#39;s ads are worse to me than new feature dialogues. Which brings me to Apple. I pay for a $1k+ device,…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nypost.com/2026/04/11/us-news/us-appeals-court-declares-158-year-old-home-distilling-ban-unconstitutional/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;US appeals court declares 158-year-old home distilling ban unconstitutional&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nypost.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47751781&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;460 points · 337 comments · by t-3&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has struck down a 158-year-old federal ban on home distilling, ruling that the Reconstruction-era law is an unconstitutional overreach of congressional taxing power. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nypost.com/2026/04/11/us-news/us-appeals-court-declares-158-year-old-home-distilling-ban-unconstitutional/&quot; title=&quot;US appeals court declares 158-year-old home distilling ban unconstitutional    The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of ‌Appeals in New Orleans on Friday declared unconstitutional a nearly 158-year-old federal ban on home distilling.    Primary Menu    Sections    * [US News](https://nypost.com/us-news/)    + [Metro](https://nypost.com/metro/)    + [Long Island](https://nypost.com/long-island/)    + [Politics](https://nypost.com/politics/)  * [World News](https://nypost.com/world-news/)  * [Page…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The ruling has sparked debate over the federal government&amp;#39;s power to regulate non-commercial home activities under the Commerce Clause, with some users arguing that precedents like *Gonzales v. Raich* and *Wickard v. Filburn* should be overturned next &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753269&quot; title=&quot;Do this one next: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzales_v._Raich The Supreme Court somehow held that the feds can regulate what you do in your own home (in this case, growing marijuana for personal use) because it could have a butterfly effect on the interstate price. (Constitutionally, the feds can only regulate _interstate_ commerce.)&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753346&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d imagine one wants to litigate Wickard v. Filburn in its entirety, rather than just the downstream Gonzales v. Raich&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While many expect federal marijuana legalization within a decade due to broad public support, others remain opposed due to the &amp;#34;negative externalities&amp;#34; of the smell and smoke in public or multi-family housing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753890&quot; title=&quot;I think much more likely is that it will just be made legal federally sometime in the next decade. Marijuana legalization has majorities across ideologies ( https://news.gallup.com/poll/514007/grassroots-support-legal... ) and even though the inability to create federal law on something so popular seems like a good case study on how the US system doesn&amp;#39;t always do a good job representing it&amp;#39;s actual people, it seems to be at a critical mass where it can&amp;#39;t be ignored for much longer. Even my…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47754099&quot; title=&quot;You’re probably right, though I dread the possibility. I cannot stand the smell, and one of the best things about moving from California to Texas was avoiding that pervasive smell being everywhere. Negative externalities of personal behavior really need to be handled better in our society. If you want pot to be legal, fine, but only inside your own personal enclosed house.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47754814&quot; title=&quot;I personally would be okay with having it legal if smoking could still be banned in multifamily complexes. I don&amp;#39;t care if my neighbors are using edibles, but since I know that legalized weed means more smoke coming from my neighbors&amp;#39; balconies, I will always vote &amp;#39;No&amp;#39; when marijuana legalization is on the ballot in my location.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, commenters clarified that the primary danger of home distilling is fire rather than methanol poisoning, which historically stems from industrial alcohol rather than grain fermentation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47752706&quot; title=&quot;Missed in the previous discussion: methanol is irrelevant. Grain based ferments have essentially zero methanol.(And methanol risk is a function of its concentration relative to ethanol — the treatment for methanol poisoning is… ethanol!) even fruit based fermentations with significantly higher pectin concentrations only produce trace methanol, and it’s not all that well concentrated in a distillation due to azeotropes (which also says that throwing out the heads doesn’t help that much).…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/sterlingcrispin/nothing-ever-happens&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Nothing Ever Happens: Polymarket bot that always buys No on non-sports markets&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753472&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;469 points · 274 comments · by m-hodges&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#34;Nothing Ever Happens&amp;#34; is an open-source Python bot designed to automatically buy &amp;#34;No&amp;#34; outcomes on standalone, non-sports markets on the Polymarket prediction platform. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/sterlingcrispin/nothing-ever-happens&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - sterlingcrispin/nothing-ever-happens    URL Source: https://github.com/sterlingcrispin/nothing-ever-happens    Markdown Content:  # GitHub - sterlingcrispin/nothing-ever-happens · GitHub    [Skip to content](https://github.com/sterlingcrispin/nothing-ever-happens#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [](https://github.com/)    [Sign in](https://github.com/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fsterlingcrispin%2Fnothing-ever-happens)    Appearance settings    *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#34;Nothing Ever Happens&amp;#34; bot is presented as a &amp;#34;meme&amp;#34; project that bets against fantastical outcomes, leveraging the fact that 73% of Polymarket events resolve to &amp;#34;No&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47754370&quot; title=&quot;https://x.com/sterlingcrispin/status/2043723823678382254 They admit no returns. But it does seem like a fun project and nowhere does it say anything about returns or profits so not scammy imo just funny meme backed code&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47755232&quot; title=&quot;Yes exactly. The bot has zero risk management and I have a strong disclaimer on the github it is essentially a meme. 73% of all polymarkets do resolve to No though. There&amp;#39;s a good dataset on huggingface if you wanted to do some data science https://huggingface.co/datasets/SII-WANGZJ/Polymarket_data&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this strategy capitalizes on a human bias toward &amp;#34;exciting&amp;#34; outcomes that are often overpriced, others contend that market efficiency and bookie cuts likely price these bets at their fair value, negating potential profits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47755668&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; 73% of all polymarkets do resolve to No though. I bet the average price for a no bet across these markets is 73 cents.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47754091&quot; title=&quot;Basically arbitraging human imagination. People love coming up with fantastical concepts because they get attention, but the more exciting a market is, the less likely it is to actually happen. Reality is usually boring.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47755315&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s interesting that this is explicitly for non-sports markets because I see no reason why this would be less applicable there. Sports betters have long talked about that the winning strategy is usually to bet the under (i.e. the no) on most bets.  The over (i.e. the yes) is generally a more exciting and fun outcome which causes it to attract more betters which in turns makes that side overpriced. Like with this bot, I have no idea if that will still lead to actual positive returns.  This…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47754146&quot; title=&quot;Already priced in.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters emphasize that while inefficient markets may offer positive expected value (EV) initially, open-sourcing such strategies quickly leads to a stable feedback loop where the market reprices to eliminate the edge &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47757053&quot; title=&quot;It doesn&amp;#39;t matter if 99% resolve no, if they&amp;#39;re priced appropriately betting no on every single one won&amp;#39;t make you money.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47755503&quot; title=&quot;Strategies like this can easily be positive EV until enough people discover it and that actually is the driving force behind efficient pricing. Here&amp;#39;s how the mechanism works: I find that something is statistically worth $0.70 but I am able to buy it for $0.60 and statistically sell it for $0.70 (in the average). I make $0.10 each trade on average. Until you come along, copy my strategy and change $0.60 to $0.61 to frontrun my trades. Then someone else does it for $0.62. Until the market…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2026/04/android-now-stops-you-sharing-your-location-in-photos/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Android now stops you sharing your location in photos&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (shkspr.mobi)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47750669&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;424 points · 319 comments · by edent&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google has updated Android to automatically strip geolocation metadata from photos shared via the web, Bluetooth, and email to enhance user privacy, a move that complicates the functionality of niche websites and services that rely on geotagged image data. &lt;a href=&quot;https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2026/04/android-now-stops-you-sharing-your-location-in-photos/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Android now stops you sharing your location in photos    URL Source: https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2026/04/android-now-stops-you-sharing-your-location-in-photos/    Published Time: 2026-04-13T12:34:48+01:00    Markdown Content:  # Android now stops you sharing your location in photos – Terence Eden’s Blog  [![Image 1: Terence Eden. He has a beard and is smiling.](https://shkspr.mobi/apple-touch-icon.png)](https://shkspr.mobi/blog)[Terence Eden’s Blog](https://shkspr.mobi/blog)[![Image 2:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The consensus among commenters is that stripping EXIF data is a necessary privacy protection, as most users are unaware they are sharing live GPS coordinates with random websites &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47751082&quot; title=&quot;Most likely: actually using the geolocation is an extremely niche usecase for images uploaded from mobile browsers. I’d wager 99.9% of the users didn’t realize that they are effectively sending their live GPS coords to a random website when taking a photo. But yes, a prop to the input tag ’includeLocation’ which would then give the user some popup confirmation prompt would have been nice&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47751105&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a sad story and a fun-looking project but I think Google 100% did the right thing here. Most people have no idea how much information is included in photo metadata, and stripping it as much as possible lines up to how people expect the world to work.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue this &amp;#34;toddler-proofing&amp;#34; approach breaks legitimate workflows, such as government data collection or file naming, and frustrates power users who want full control over their data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47751059&quot; title=&quot;Similarly, the native Android photo picker strips the original filename.  This causes daily customer support issues, where people keep asking the app developer why they&amp;#39;re renaming their files. https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/268079113 Status: Won&amp;#39;t Fix (Intended Behavior).&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47751860&quot; title=&quot;My first eye-opening moment working within the government was with team of herpetologists at the state conservation agency. They had a pretty slick public education campaign around protecting Gopher Tortoise habitats and a grand call-to-action &amp;#39;let the agency know where and when they see their nests&amp;#39;. The whole thing fell apart because they were getting tons of earnestly-submitted junk data from earnestly-engaged citizens. Turns out the application was just a form that they asked people to fill…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47752722&quot; title=&quot;I want the location on every time,  without exception. The current behavior is exactly what I wanted. These &amp;#39;all users are imbeciles that need our protection&amp;#39; design pattern needs to die a swift death. It&amp;#39;s maddening, We&amp;#39;re constantly taking kitchen knives and replacing them with the colorful plastic toddler version and still have the same cutting tasks.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Some participants remain skeptical of Google&amp;#39;s motives, noting that the company often prioritizes privacy only when it doesn&amp;#39;t interfere with advertising revenue or data consolidation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47751219&quot; title=&quot;If google really cared about privacy, they wouldn&amp;#39;t have moved maps away from a subdomain. now if I want maps to have my location (logical), I need to grant google _search_ my location too.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47751530&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not all-or-nothing; sometimes some people at Google push for some things to improve privacy. Rarely happens when revenue is at stake. Android used to ask you &amp;#39;do you want to alllow internet access?&amp;#39; as an app permission. Google removed that, as it would stop ads from showing up. Devastating change for privacy and security, great for revenue.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hamvocke.com/blog/a-guide-to-customizing-your-tmux-conf/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Make tmux pretty and usable (2024)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (hamvocke.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47752819&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;457 points · 278 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This guide explains how to customize tmux by editing the `.tmux.conf` file to improve usability and aesthetics. It provides specific configurations for remapping prefix keys, creating intuitive pane splits, enabling mouse support, and applying custom color schemes to the status bar and panes. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hamvocke.com/blog/a-guide-to-customizing-your-tmux-conf/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Make tmux Pretty and Usable - Ham Vocke    URL Source: https://hamvocke.com/blog/a-guide-to-customizing-your-tmux-conf/    Markdown Content:  # Make tmux Pretty and Usable - Ham Vocke  [![Image 1: Beer Pig](https://hamvocke.com/img/beerpig.svg) Ham Vocke](https://hamvocke.com/)  *   [Blog](https://hamvocke.com/blog)  *   [Moments](https://hamvocke.com/moments)  *   [About](https://hamvocke.com/about)  *   [Now](https://hamvocke.com/now)    # Make tmux Pretty and Usable    In my [previous blog…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While many users have migrated from tmux to modern alternatives like Zellij for its superior UI and mouse handling &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753032&quot; title=&quot;I gave up on it once I discovered https://zellij.dev/ Just even for how tab and panes are setup, and how it&amp;#39;s good for scrolling and text selection with your mouse for copy pasting.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753105&quot; title=&quot;I used tmux for a few years, until one day I discovered Zellij. With its significantly better UI and overall user experience, I was instantly convinced.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others have returned to tmux due to stability issues or specific key-binding fixes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753726&quot; title=&quot;I left tmux for zellij after several unsuccessful attempts to get Shift+Enter working. Was quite impressed initially and invested weeks in building new muscle memory, but somehow Zellij crashed with panic more than once, leaving all my processes orphaned. Decided to go back to tmux, and found a simple fix for my Shift+Enter issue. In case anyone is looking for it, the fix is &amp;#39;bind-key -T root S-Enter send-keys C-j&amp;#39; borrowed from https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/6072 .&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant portion of the community argues that tmux should be used minimally for session persistence rather than complex window management, which they prefer to handle via native terminal features or window managers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47756107&quot; title=&quot;Once I discovered window managers and graphics, I stopped using half-baked features to emulate them in the terminal. I use tmux to reattach to programs after the network connection dies, and not really anything else. I would welcome a version of it that stripped out everything but that, and just replayed the last few pages of scrollback on reattach.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753242&quot; title=&quot;I stopped using tmux when I started using kitty terminal with native split windows. I prefer the native window management of kitty, but I do miss the session saving of tmux (e.g. if I accidentally close a tab).&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753061&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s a totally different thing.  Native macOS app vs portable terminal multiplexer.  My main use case for tmux is detaching and re-attaching to a session on a remote server, for which it&amp;#39;s extremely useful.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. For those seeking a middle ground, &amp;#34;Control Mode&amp;#34; (`tmux -CC`) is highlighted as a way to integrate tmux sessions directly into a terminal&amp;#39;s native tabs and scrollback &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47754123&quot; title=&quot;Guys, did you know about tmux control mode? It tells the host terminal to treat tmux tabs as actual tabs in the terminal. That means that things like scrollback, tab navigation, copy paste, keyboard shortcuts, etc are all handled natively, and you can visually see all your tmux tabs! It doesn&amp;#39;t have great support across all terminals, but it does work great in iTerm 2. Try `tmux -CC` in iTerm. For a tmux novice like me, this was a total game changer :)&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.viktorcessan.com/the-economics-of-software-teams/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The economics of software teams: Why most engineering orgs are flying blind&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (viktorcessan.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47748064&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;417 points · 281 comments · by kiyanwang&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Most engineering organizations lack financial visibility, failing to track the roughly €1 million annual cost of an eight-person team against the 3x to 5x value return required for viability. As AI reduces the competitive moat of large codebases, companies must shift from activity metrics to rigorous economic analysis. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.viktorcessan.com/the-economics-of-software-teams/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Economics of Software Teams: Why Most Engineering Organizations Are Flying Blind    URL Source: https://www.viktorcessan.com/the-economics-of-software-teams/    Published Time: 2026-03-17    Markdown Content:  [← Back to Blog](https://www.viktorcessan.com/blog/)  This post works through the financial logic of software teams, from what a team of eight engineers actually costs per month to what it needs to generate to be economically viable. It also examines why most teams have no visibility…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether the primary challenge of software engineering is the technical implementation or the conceptual task of defining what to build &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47752970&quot; title=&quot;All of this article, both the good (critique of the status quo ante) and the bad (entirely too believing of LLM boosterism) are missing (or not stressing enough) the most important point, which is that the actual programming is not the hard part.  Figuring out what exactly needs programmed is the hard part. For reasons which it would take a while to unpack, if is often the case that the best (or sometimes only) way to find out what programming actually needs to be done, is to program something…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753987&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; the actual programming is not the hard part We&amp;#39;ve all been hearing that a lot and it&amp;#39;s made a lot of people forget that, although programming might not be the hardest part, it&amp;#39;s still hard .&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47754641&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; which is that the actual programming is not the hard part. Figuring out what exactly needs programmed is the hard part. I’m growing tired of this aphorism because I’ve been in enough situations where it was not true. Some times the programming part really is very hard even when it’s easy to know what needs to be built. I’ve worked on some projects where the business proposition was conceptually simple but the whole reason the business opportunity existed was that it was an extremely hard…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that programming is merely a means to explore a problem space &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47752970&quot; title=&quot;All of this article, both the good (critique of the status quo ante) and the bad (entirely too believing of LLM boosterism) are missing (or not stressing enough) the most important point, which is that the actual programming is not the hard part.  Figuring out what exactly needs programmed is the hard part. For reasons which it would take a while to unpack, if is often the case that the best (or sometimes only) way to find out what programming actually needs to be done, is to program something…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that complex engineering remains a significant hurdle that cannot be dismissed as easy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753987&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; the actual programming is not the hard part We&amp;#39;ve all been hearing that a lot and it&amp;#39;s made a lot of people forget that, although programming might not be the hardest part, it&amp;#39;s still hard .&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47754641&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; which is that the actual programming is not the hard part. Figuring out what exactly needs programmed is the hard part. I’m growing tired of this aphorism because I’ve been in enough situations where it was not true. Some times the programming part really is very hard even when it’s easy to know what needs to be built. I’ve worked on some projects where the business proposition was conceptually simple but the whole reason the business opportunity existed was that it was an extremely hard…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is strong skepticism regarding the article&amp;#39;s optimism for AI agents; critics argue that LLMs currently produce &amp;#34;bricked&amp;#34; codebases where structural integrity is sacrificed for a polished exterior, eventually leading to a total inability to make progress &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47750414&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; A messy codebase is still cheaper to send ten agents through than to staff a team around People who say that haven&amp;#39;t used today&amp;#39;s agents enough or haven&amp;#39;t looked closely at what they produce. The code they write isn&amp;#39;t messy at all. It&amp;#39;s more like asking the agent to build a building from floorplans and spec, and it produces everything in the right measurements and right colours and passes all tests. Except then you find out that the walls and beams are made of foam and the art is…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47748834&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; A messy codebase is still cheaper to send ten agents through than to staff a team around. And even if the agents need ten days to reason through an unfamiliar system, that is still faster and cheaper than most development teams operating today. I’ve been on 2 failed projects that have been entirely AI generated and it’s not that agents slow down and you can just send more agents to work on projects for longer, it’s that they becoming completely unable to make any progress whatsoever, and…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these technical concerns, some commenters find the prospect of an &amp;#34;agent-to-agent&amp;#34; world appealing if it eliminates corporate bureaucracy and management layers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47748634&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The obvious objection is that code produced at that speed becomes unmanageable, a liability in itself. That is a reasonable concern, but it largely applies when agents produce code that humans then maintain. Agentic platforms are being iterated upon quickly, and for established patterns and non-business-critical code, which is the majority of what most engineering organizations actually maintain, detailed human familiarity with the codebase matters less than it once did. A messy codebase is…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47748879&quot; title=&quot;Ceding the premise that the AGI is gonna eat my job, my job involves reading the spec to be able verify the code and output so the there’s a human to fire and sue. There are five layers of fluffy management and corporate BS before we get to that part, and the AGI is more competent at those fungible skills. With the annoying process people out of the picture, even reviewing vibeslop full time sounds kinda nice… Feet up, warm coffee, just me and my agents so I can swear whenever I need to. No…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/13/stanford-report-highlights-growing-disconnect-between-ai-insiders-and-everyone-else/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Stanford report highlights growing disconnect between AI insiders and everyone&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techcrunch.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47758028&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;263 points · &lt;strong&gt;406 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by ZeidJ&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stanford’s 2026 AI Index report reveals a widening gap between optimistic industry experts and a skeptical public increasingly anxious about AI&amp;#39;s impact on jobs, healthcare, and the economy. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/13/stanford-report-highlights-growing-disconnect-between-ai-insiders-and-everyone-else/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Stanford report highlights growing disconnect between AI insiders and everyone else    URL Source: https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/13/stanford-report-highlights-growing-disconnect-between-ai-insiders-and-everyone-else/    Published Time: 2026-04-13T18:55:37+00:00    Markdown Content:  AI experts and the public’s opinion on the technology are increasingly diverging, [according to](https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2026-ai-index-report/public-opinion) Stanford University’s [annual…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A sharp divide exists between leadership and &amp;#34;AI experts&amp;#34; who see massive productivity gains—such as condensing two-week projects into minutes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47759077&quot; title=&quot;I get it, but as a &amp;#39;AI expert and senior leader&amp;#39; myself in my 1,000 people organization (in relative terms), the disconnect I have is: A lot of what non-believers say matches &amp;#39;enthusiasm on the ground is lacking as results rarely live up to the extremely rosy promises&amp;#39;. They would then say they need 2 weeks to work on a specific project, the good old way, maybe with some light AI use along the way. But then I&amp;#39;m like &amp;#39;hmm actually let me try this real quick&amp;#39; and I prompt Claude for 3 minutes,…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;—and rank-and-file engineers who find the technology underwhelming and its promises &amp;#34;rosy&amp;#34; but unfulfilled &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47758174&quot; title=&quot;This has mirrored what I&amp;#39;ve seen in my company.  People in the data science/ML part of the company are super excited about AI and are always giving presentations on it and evangelizing it.  Most engineers in other areas, though, are generally underwhelmed every time they try using it.  It&amp;#39;s being heavily pushed by AI &amp;#39;experts&amp;#39; and senior leaders, but the enthusiasm on the ground is lacking as results rarely live up to the extremely rosy promises that the &amp;#39;experts&amp;#39; keep making.  Meanwhile,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47758254&quot; title=&quot;Underwhelmed is the absolute correct word to use here. Absolutely everyone raves about this but other than a few basic computer related tasks I’ve not seen compelling use cases that justify the billions being lit on fire trying to pursue it. My cynical take is the crypto bro’s needed something to do with their useless GPU’s after the crash and found the perfect answer in LLM’s.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that the push for AI is creating a &amp;#34;mania&amp;#34; that sidelines engineering rigor in favor of useless proofs of concept &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47758355&quot; title=&quot;For mine it’s worse because we have new leadership who believes in it to a far larger extent than it can deliver. Now a massive amount of our workforce is building up proofs of concepts and spitting out tons of effectively useless output to look good because of how strongly they’ve signaled it’s good for careers here to fully embrace it. It’s a massive mess and there’s nobody to clean it up, and the voices advocating for rigor or good engineering practices are being sidelined. It’s full out…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, while younger generations increasingly view AI as a &amp;#34;bad or immoral&amp;#34; tool associated with cheating &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47758364&quot; title=&quot;I think people are really underestimating how poorly today&amp;#39;s tweens think of AI. &amp;#39;That looks like chatgpt&amp;#39; is an insult. Kids avoid things because they heard somewhere that AI might have been involved and have a sense that means it is bad or immoral or illegal or cheating in some nebulous way, and it&amp;#39;s reinforced by their teachers telling them that using AI for homework is cheating. I think this next generation is going to come up fundamentally believing that AI is generally a bad thing, and…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47758124&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;... with Gen Z reportedly leading the way... The kids are alright.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, there is significant concern that viewing junior engineers as replaceable by AI will cause organizations to &amp;#34;rot from the inside&amp;#34; by destroying the pipeline for future senior talent &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47758499&quot; title=&quot;I feel like the junior problem contributes more heavily than people might think. The people on top see juniors as replaceable since they view them as cheap menial labor, whereas most seniors at least acknowledge the human element as part of the benefit&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47758582&quot; title=&quot;Today&amp;#39;s juniors are tomorrow&amp;#39;s seniors, or more importantly today&amp;#39;s seniors&amp;#39; yesterday. They do the dirty, repetitive work, learn the systems inside out, take note of the flaws, and fix them if they are motivated and the system/process allows. Thinking them as replaceable, worthless gears is allowing your organization rot from inside. I can&amp;#39;t believe people can&amp;#39;t see it.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.neowin.net/opinions/microsoft-isnt-removing-copilot-from-windows-11-its-just-renaming-it/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft isn&amp;#39;t removing Copilot from Windows 11, it&amp;#39;s just renaming it&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (neowin.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47751936&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;376 points · 287 comments · by bundie&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.neowin.net/opinions/microsoft-isnt-removing-copilot-from-windows-11-its-just-renaming-it/&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion reflects a deep frustration with Microsoft’s tendency to add &amp;#34;bloat&amp;#34; to simple utilities, such as integrating AI into Notepad or previously attempting to replace Paint with Paint 3D &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47752891&quot; title=&quot;But it&amp;#39;s just so unnecessary. Everyone has always expected Notepad to be a simple utility as it has always been, why does it need optional AI features? It just feels like bloat.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753127&quot; title=&quot;Reminder that this is the company that decided to replace Paint with something called &amp;#39;Paint 3D&amp;#39;, the laggiest and bloatiest &amp;#39;literally nobody wanted this&amp;#39; drawing app I&amp;#39;ve ever seen.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find the ability to toggle these features off acceptable, others view the renaming of Copilot as a superficial change that mirrors past empty corporate gestures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47752724&quot; title=&quot;From the article: &amp;#39;Additionally, AI features in Notepad settings has been renamed to Advanced features and it allows users to toggle off AI capabilities within the app.&amp;#39; I honestly don&amp;#39;t mind this, as long as it&amp;#39;s not being forced. And I believe this feature exists only within their npu PCs.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47754201&quot; title=&quot;So they didn&amp;#39;t remove it, they just renamed it? Reminds me of that time we fixed racism by renaming the master branch to main.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Consequently, many users are migrating to Linux for a cleaner experience, though some remain on Windows due to kernel-level anti-cheat in games or superior battery life on mobile hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753457&quot; title=&quot;I have windows on my desktop pc because it&amp;#39;s easier to get executable mods (downgraders, engine fixes, etc) working on windows than linux.  There&amp;#39;s also the matter of &amp;#39;kernel level anti-cheat&amp;#39; games not working. But if I just judge windows vs linux, on even ground, W11 is painful .  I&amp;#39;ve main&amp;#39;d linux on my laptop for ~ 25 years.  There was a time when it was a jank experience that I put up with for better devex, but that ended in the late 00&amp;#39;s.  From that point forward, unless you were trying…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753521&quot; title=&quot;I just run two drives - one with windows and one with Linux. I treat the windows one as a console essentially, not even logged into my password manager or email or anything. It is only for games. Basically an Xbox, with all sorts of normal annoying UX, but it doesn’t matter for all of the ~2 minutes until I can launch a game Separate linux drive for everything else.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47754937&quot; title=&quot;I assume this isn&amp;#39;t the case with every machine, but every hardware I&amp;#39;ve ever owned (including the Framework 13, which has pretty good Linux support) has had worse battery life under Linux (mainstream distros like Fedora and Ubuntu). To say nothing of the truly excellent battery life Macs these days get. That&amp;#39;s the only reason to avoid Linux on a laptop these days, IMO.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://servo.org/blog/2026/04/13/servo-0.1.0-release/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Servo is now available on crates.io&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (servo.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47750872&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;482 points · 152 comments · by ffin&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Servo project has released version 0.1.0 of its web engine as a crate on crates.io, offering a high-performance embedding API and a new long-term support (LTS) version for developers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://servo.org/blog/2026/04/13/servo-0.1.0-release/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Servo is now available on crates.io - Servo aims to empower developers with a lightweight, high-performance alternative for embedding web technologies in applications.    URL Source: https://servo.org/blog/2026/04/13/servo-0.1.0-release/    Published Time: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 05:25:39 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Servo is now available on crates.io - Servo aims to empower developers with a lightweight, high-performance alternative for embedding web technologies in applications.    [![Image 1: Servo…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The availability of Servo on crates.io has sparked debate over whether AI should be used to accelerate the development of such critical, underfunded infrastructure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753338&quot; title=&quot;This should be the real benchmark of AI coding skills - how fast do we get safe/modern infrastructure/tooling that everyone agrees we need but nobody can fund the development. If Anthropic wants marketing for Mythos without publishing it - show us servo contrib log or something like that. It aligns nicely with their fundamental infrastructure safety goals. I&amp;#39;d trust that way more than x% increase on y bench. Hire a core contributor on Servo or Rust, give him unlimited model access and let&amp;#39;s see…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, though some users strongly reject the idea of &amp;#34;vibe-coded&amp;#34; foundational tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753401&quot; title=&quot;We do not need vibe-coded critical infrastructure.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant portion of the discussion focuses on Rust’s versioning system, with critics arguing that Cargo’s handling of 0.x versions discourages reaching 1.0 and creates semantic confusion &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47752915&quot; title=&quot;The fundamental problem with Rust versioning is that 0.3.5 is compatible with 0.3.6, but not 0.4.0 or 1.0.0; when major version is 0, the minor takes the role of major and patch takes the role of minor. So packages iterate through 0.x versions, and eventually, they reach a version that&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;stable&amp;#39;. If version 0.7 turned out to hit the right API and not require backward incompatible changes, releasing a version 1.0 would be as disruptive as a major version change to your users and communicate…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753073&quot; title=&quot;Personally, I think the 0 major version is a bad idea. I hear the desire to not want to have to make guarantees about stability in the early stages of development and you don&amp;#39;t want people depending on it. But hiding that behind &amp;#39;v0.x&amp;#39; doesn&amp;#39;t change the fact that you are releasing versions and people are depending on it. If you didn&amp;#39;t want people to depend on your package (hence the word &amp;#39;dependency&amp;#39;) then why release it? If your public interface changes, bump that major version number. What…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see the release as &amp;#34;too little too late&amp;#34; due to the rise of system-provided webviews &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47752228&quot; title=&quot;Too little too late now that the new meta is to use system provided webviews so you don&amp;#39;t have to ship a big ass web renderer per app.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others are already experimenting with the crate for tasks like CLI-based webpage rendering &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753172&quot; title=&quot;Here&amp;#39;s a vibe-coded &amp;#39;servo-shot&amp;#39; CLI tool which uses this crate to render an image of a web page: https://github.com/simonw/research/tree/main/servo-crate-exp... git clone https://github.com/simonw/research    cd research/servo-crate-exploration/servo-shot    cargo build    ./target/debug/servo-shot https://news.ycombinator.com/ Here&amp;#39;s the image it generated: https://gist.github.com/simonw/c2cb4fcb15b0837bbc4540c3d398c...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt; and suggesting the eventual replacement of its C++ SpiderMonkey engine with a native Rust alternative &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47752045&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a great move. The early development of Rust aimed to support Servo. However, it&amp;#39;s still disappointing that the script engine uses SpiderMonkey, which is purely C++.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47752273&quot; title=&quot;There are what, 5+ rust javascript engines that claim to be production-ready? Bolting one of those on in place of spider monkey seems like a reasonable future direction&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ringmast4r.substack.com/p/we-may-be-living-through-the-most&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;This year’s insane timeline of hacks&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ringmast4r.substack.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47752884&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;345 points · 201 comments · by laurex&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first four months of 2026 have seen an unprecedented wave of cyberattacks by state-linked and criminal alliances, including a massive 200,000-device wiper attack on Stryker, breaches of FBI and Lockheed Martin systems, and a 1.5-billion-record Salesforce exploitation targeting hundreds of global organizations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ringmast4r.substack.com/p/we-may-be-living-through-the-most&quot; title=&quot;Title: We May Be Living Through the Most Consequential Hundred Days in Cyber History, and Almost Nobody Has Noticed    URL Source: https://ringmast4r.substack.com/p/we-may-be-living-through-the-most    Published Time: 2026-04-13T03:41:39+00:00    Markdown Content:  # We May Be Living Through the Most Consequential Hundred Days in Cyber History, and Almost Nobody Has Noticed    [](https://substack.com/?utm_content=island-substack-logo)    # [Patrick Quirk](https://ringmast4r.substack.com/)    Subscribe Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The tech industry is entering a &amp;#34;ransomware apocalypse&amp;#34; as generative AI lowers the barrier for sophisticated phishing, malvertising, and supply chain attacks previously reserved for nation-states &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47754766&quot; title=&quot;As part of my work in technical diligence, I create medium-long form content marketing material on topics germane to PE investment in tech. In the last six months I did a series (not yet published) on the state of security in the age of gen-AI. Basically, we are entering the ransomware apocalypse. It is insane what a godsend gen-AI has been to the cybercrime sector. When all you need to do is make something good enough to fool some of the people some of the time, genAI is perfect . Things that…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47756493&quot; title=&quot;I get amused that people don&amp;#39;t realize that genAI is an existential threat to the internet and everything that has been built on it. 1) One can no longer trust things out on the web.  2) One no longer needs things out on the web. For 1), I hope the defense mechanism kicks in time to bake security into our computing culture and pervades throughout the stack.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see security as a promising career path for the youth, veterans warn of extreme burnout caused by corporate negligence and the potential for AI to eventually automate defensive roles as well &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47754766&quot; title=&quot;As part of my work in technical diligence, I create medium-long form content marketing material on topics germane to PE investment in tech. In the last six months I did a series (not yet published) on the state of security in the age of gen-AI. Basically, we are entering the ransomware apocalypse. It is insane what a godsend gen-AI has been to the cybercrime sector. When all you need to do is make something good enough to fool some of the people some of the time, genAI is perfect . Things that…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47755570&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m a head of security, great career, did engineering into management, made a tidy living doing advanced work as a risk plumber across companies that have been relevant. I&amp;#39;ve built great teams, met and solved hard IR, delved into the real reaches of vuln research, other neckbeard things, got paid very well along the way. Seen and worked on the APT issues. More or less, I am the attractive resume, and: the game has changed folks. For what it is worth, I am taking my ball and going home in about…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47756521&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If you are young and wanting a promising trade in tech, security would absolutely be a good choice. If AI is capable of performing these attacks, what would stop AI from replacing the security engineers?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the escalating severity of these breaches, the general public remains largely indifferent due to &amp;#34;crisis fatigue&amp;#34; and a constant stream of competing global anxieties &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753309&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Stacked on top of each other across roughly a hundred days, these events are something a historian of computing security writing in 2050 will probably file as a turning point, regardless of what else happens between now and then. And yet, the public conversation around them has been quiet to the point of being strange. There&amp;#39;s a lot current events that once would have been considered historical: trip around the Moon,  war out of nowhere, unprecedented explosion of kleptocracy l, enormously…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753329&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; And yet, the public conversation around them has been quiet to the point of being strange. i dont think its that strange. there are multiple wars raging on, with many people fearing the breakout of a global conflict. a giant pedophile ring has been exposed that no one in power seems interested in doing anything about. prices for everything are haywire. markets are an absolute rollercoaster, hinging completely on one mans late night tweets. and so on. people just dont have the bandwidth to…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, experts suggest that without systemic accountability for sloppy security practices, the internet may become fundamentally unsafe for the average user &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47754474&quot; title=&quot;As someone who&amp;#39;s older, and is just generally gobsmacked all the time by the sloppiness in cybersecurity, all of this is just not surprising. Look, love or hate it, here&amp;#39;s what happened; a LONG time ago (in tech terms) Microsoft and others normalized some very stupid practices; when I teach about it I basically illustrate it like this: &amp;#39;If I handed you a piece of paper that said &amp;#39;Go jump off a bridge&amp;#39;&amp;#39; will you survive this encounter with me? Because a very large, perhaps majority, of computer…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47756203&quot; title=&quot;This just seems like the result is people are going to be driven off the internet.  It will simply not be safe for the layperson.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://aphyr.com/posts/417-the-future-of-everything-is-lies-i-guess-safety&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Future of Everything Is Lies, I Guess: Safety&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (aphyr.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47754379&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;330 points · 181 comments · by aphyr&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The proliferation of machine learning systems endangers physical and psychological safety by enabling sophisticated cyberattacks, automated harassment, and large-scale fraud while lowering the barrier for developing &amp;#34;unaligned&amp;#34; or malicious models. These technologies also facilitate the expansion of autonomous weaponry and increase the trauma experienced by human content moderators. &lt;a href=&quot;https://aphyr.com/posts/417-the-future-of-everything-is-lies-i-guess-safety&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Future of Everything is Lies, I Guess: Safety    URL Source: https://aphyr.com/posts/417-the-future-of-everything-is-lies-i-guess-safety    Markdown Content:  # The Future of Everything is Lies, I Guess: Safety    *   [Aphyr](https://aphyr.com/)  *   [About](https://aphyr.com/about)  *   [Blog](https://aphyr.com/posts)  *   [Photos](https://aphyr.com/photos)  *   [Code](http://github.com/aphyr)    # [The Future of Everything is Lies, I Guess:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the inherent difficulty of &amp;#34;alignment,&amp;#34; with some arguing that commercial and governmental interests are fundamentally adversarial to individuals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47755823&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Alignment&amp;#39; In what world would I ever expect a commercial (or governmental) entity to have precise alignment with me personally, or even with my own business? I argue those relationships are necessarily adversarial, and trusting anyone else to align their &amp;#39;AI&amp;#39; tool to my goals, needs, and/or desires is a recipe for having my livelihood completely reassigned into someone else&amp;#39;s wallet.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some participants believe humans are biologically or socially predisposed toward prosocial alignment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47756914&quot; title=&quot;You can tell that broad alignment between people is natural just by looking at the effort that corporations and governments make to undermine it.  Alignment between people is perhaps not a state of nature , but it really is a pretty normal consequence of a fairly small amount of education and of middle-class existence that is left to itself (i.e. without brain-washing and deliberately working to create out-groups).  If you&amp;#39;re eating enough and have a few brain cells to rub together, then you…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47755246&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Unlike human brains, which are biologically predisposed to acquire prosocial behavior, there is nothing intrinsic in the mathematics or hardware that ensures models are nice. How did brains acquire this predisposition if there is nothing intrinsic in the mathematics or hardware? The answer is &amp;#39;through evolution&amp;#39; which is just an alternative optimization procedure.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that human history is defined by violent value misalignments and that systems like markets or civilizations were specifically invented to manage these conflicts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47757273&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; broad alignment between people is natural Uh, what? People have been killing each other over values misalignments since there have been people. We invented civilization in part to protect our farms and granaries from people who disagreed with us on whose grain was in said granaries.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47757035&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; You can tell that broad alignment between people is natural It really isn&amp;#39;t. The whole point of the market system is to collectively align people&amp;#39;s actions towards a shared target of &amp;#39;Pareto-optimized total welfare&amp;#39;.  And even then the alignment is approximate and heavily constrained due to a combination of transaction costs (which also account for e.g. externalities) and information asymmetries.  But transaction costs and information asymmetries apply to any system of alignment, including…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. This debate extends to anthropological theories, contrasting the idea of &amp;#34;everyday communism&amp;#34; and gift economies against the modern tendency to view all human interactions through a market-based lens &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47757515&quot; title=&quot;Please read David Graeber. What you describe is factually not how human society formed.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47757619&quot; title=&quot;AIUI David Graeber famously pointed out that people in small groups can form the equivalent of a &amp;#39;market&amp;#39; simply by exchanging favours (&amp;#39;I&amp;#39;ll scratch your back if you scratch mine&amp;#39;) in an informal gift economy, without any money-like token or external unit of account. That&amp;#39;s quite in line with what I said.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47757666&quot; title=&quot;You understanding is mistaken. Graeber&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;everyday communism&amp;#39; is not a market, and his whole larger point is that contorting everything to the lens of markets is simply ahistorical and unempirical. I&amp;#39;d strongly suggest reading his books. They profoundly changed my understanding of how human institutions and society form.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.cloudflare.com/cf-cli-local-explorer/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Building a CLI for all of Cloudflare&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.cloudflare.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753689&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;336 points · 107 comments · by soheilpro&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudflare is rebuilding its Wrangler CLI to cover its entire API surface, introducing a technical preview (`npx cf`) and a &amp;#34;Local Explorer&amp;#34; tool to help developers and AI agents manage both remote and local resources with consistent, schema-driven commands. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.cloudflare.com/cf-cli-local-explorer/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Building a CLI for all of Cloudflare    URL Source: https://blog.cloudflare.com/cf-cli-local-explorer/    Published Time: 2026-04-13T14:29:45.821Z    Markdown Content:  2026-04-13    6 min read    ![Image 1](https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6TTRJoUvbs5eWPtnu6NuL6/d31b8479cfca7f4a77517f875f0049eb/BLOG-3224_1.png)    Cloudflare has a vast API surface. We have over 100 products, and nearly 3,000 HTTP API operations.    Increasingly, agents are the primary customer of our APIs. Developers…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The introduction of a unified Cloudflare CLI sparked a debate over the choice of TypeScript, with critics arguing it lacks the performance of languages like C or Go &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47754190&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; We write a lot of TypeScript at Cloudflare. It’s the lingua franca of software engineering. This scares me more than Im able to admit, typescript sucks and in my opinion its way worse than the more commonly used lingua franca of computing, which I would attribute to C. At least C can be used to create shared objects i guess?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47754348&quot; title=&quot;Well it does suck, and it isn&amp;#39;t really great for implementing performant developer tools, such as parsers, formatters and so on. The performance is that bad that the typescript developers are rewriting the language itself in Go. [0] Tells me everything I need to know about how bad typescript is from a performance stand point. [0] https://devblogs.microsoft.com/typescript/typescript-native-...&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, while proponents highlight its modern developer experience and suitability for scripting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47755190&quot; title=&quot;Why do you think it sucks? I used to dislike JavaScript a lot after learning it and PHP, then using languages like C#. Then TypeScript came along making JS much easier to live with, but has actually become quite nice in some ways. If you use deno as your default runtime, it&amp;#39;s almost Go-like in its simplicity when you don&amp;#39;t need much. Simple scripts, piping commands into the REPL, built-in linting, testing, etc. It&amp;#39;s not that bad! Of course you&amp;#39;re welcome to your opinion and we&amp;#39;d likely agree…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Users expressed a strong desire for better permission management, specifically requesting features to identify required API token scopes before deployment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47754283&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Tell us your hopes and dreams for a Cloudflare-wide CLI It&amp;#39;d be great if the Wrangler CLI could display the required API token permissions upfront during local dev, so you know exactly what to provision before deploying. Even better if there were something like a `cf permissions check` command that tells you what&amp;#39;s missing or unneeded perms with an API key.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47758330&quot; title=&quot;That would be glorious! If ChatGPT doesn&amp;#39;t get the permissions right on the first try I know that I&amp;#39;m going to have to spend the next hours reading the documentation or trying random combinations to get a token that works.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, early feedback on the tool emphasizes the need for standardized help flags, consistent formatting across subcommands, and non-interactive behavior for basic command queries &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47757371&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Tell us your hopes and dreams for a Cloudflare-wide CLI Initial impression: -h and --help should follow the short / long standard of providing more / less info. The approach currently used is -h and --help show command lists and point at a --help-full flag. The --help-full output seems to give what I&amp;#39;d expect on -h. This needs to be much better - it should give enough information that a user / coding agen doesn&amp;#39;t have to read websites / docs to understand how the feature works. Completions…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://thenextwavefutures.wordpress.com/2026/04/07/ai-end-digital-wave-technology-innovation-perez/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI could be the end of the digital wave, not the next big thing&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (thenextwavefutures.wordpress.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47751032&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;178 points · &lt;strong&gt;255 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by surprisetalk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#34;late-cycle investment theory&amp;#34; suggests that AI is the final optimization stage of the 1970s digital revolution rather than a new technological surge, characterized by high capital costs, incumbent dominance, and a focus on efficiency within existing systems. &lt;a href=&quot;https://thenextwavefutures.wordpress.com/2026/04/07/ai-end-digital-wave-technology-innovation-perez/&quot; title=&quot;Title: AI could be the end of the digital wave, not the next big thing    URL Source: https://thenextwavefutures.wordpress.com/2026/04/07/ai-end-digital-wave-technology-innovation-perez/    Published Time: 2026-04-07T07:15:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  # AI could be the end of the digital wave, not the next big thing – the next wave  [Skip to content](https://thenextwavefutures.wordpress.com/2026/04/07/ai-end-digital-wave-technology-innovation-perez/#main)    Search for:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide between those who view AI as a tool for unprecedented creative and technical unlocking and those who see it primarily as a mechanism for labor exploitation and the degradation of digital quality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47751602&quot; title=&quot;I think it&amp;#39;s clear to me that AI will be both things: 1) as in the article it&amp;#39;s a contraction of work- industrialization getting rid of hand-made work or the contraction of all things horse-related when the internal combustion engine came around but- it will also be 2) new technologies and ideas enabled by a completely new set of capabilities The real question is if the economic boost from the latter outpaces the losses of the former. History says these transitions aren&amp;#39;t easy on society. But…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47751713&quot; title=&quot;Hard to understand, when essential human nature is so predictable? Sure, we will do novel things with it. But society in the main will use to it exploit labor. same as it ever was.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47751753&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; do people really believe no novel things will be unlocked with this tech? Yes. It&amp;#39;s a mostly shitty but very fast and relatively inexpensive replacement for things that already exist. Give your best example of something that is novel, ie isn&amp;#39;t just replacing existing processes at scale. It&amp;#39;s been 3 and a half years now since the initial hype wave. Maybe I genuinely missed the novel trillion dollar use case that isn&amp;#39;t just labor disruption.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Some developers report a rapid decline in their ability to code without AI assistance, while others argue that &amp;#34;muscle memory&amp;#34; remains intact for experienced professionals and that boilerplate should have been automated long ago &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47751569&quot; title=&quot;I had to code something on a plane today. It used to be that you couldn&amp;#39;t get you packages or check stackoverflow. But now, I&amp;#39;m useless. My mind has turned to pudding. I cannot remember basic boilerplate stuff. Crazy how fast that goes.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47751610&quot; title=&quot;Really? How long you&amp;#39;ve been a developer? I&amp;#39;ve been almost exclusively doing &amp;#39;agent coding&amp;#39; for the last year + some months, been a professional developer for a decade or something. Tried just now to write some random JavaScript, C#, Java, Rust and Clojure &amp;#39;manually&amp;#39; and seems my muscle memory works just as well as two years ago. I&amp;#39;m wondering if this is something that hits new developers faster than more experienced ones?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47751959&quot; title=&quot;Others have addressed other aspects of this, but I want to address this: &amp;gt; I cannot remember basic boilerplate stuff. I don&amp;#39;t know exactly what you mean by boilerplate stuff, but honestly, that&amp;#39;s stuff we should have automated away prior to AI. We should not be writing boilerplate. I&amp;#39;d highly encourage you to take the time to automate this stuff away. Not even with AI, but with scripts you can run to automate boilerplate generation. (Assuming you can&amp;#39;t move it to a library/framework).&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond the workplace, users are noting a decline in the online shopping experience due to a flood of AI-generated imagery, leading some to return to physical retail &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47751450&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m currently looking for sort of niche clothes for an event and it&amp;#39;s the first time I had to give up on buying online because of the sheer amount of AI-generated pictures. Going to a physical store was just a much better experience, I can&amp;#39;t recall the last time this happened, almost all sellers on Etsy are using AI for their pictures.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47751500&quot; title=&quot;full disclosure I work at Whatnot but that sort of thing is a large part of the appeal of Whatnot to me, that people are showing off the stuff live on stream and you can ask questions about it&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/fabienmillet/WiiFin&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;WiiFin – Jellyfin Client for Nintendo Wii&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47759341&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;259 points · 128 comments · by throwawayk7h&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WiiFin is an experimental, open-source homebrew client that allows Nintendo Wii users to stream media from Jellyfin servers via server-side transcoding. It supports library browsing, secure authentication, and video playback using an integrated MPlayer CE engine. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/fabienmillet/WiiFin&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - fabienmillet/WiiFin: Jellyfin Client for Wii    URL Source: https://github.com/fabienmillet/WiiFin    Markdown Content:  # GitHub - fabienmillet/WiiFin: Jellyfin Client for Wii · GitHub    [Skip to content](https://github.com/fabienmillet/WiiFin#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [](https://github.com/)    [Sign in](https://github.com/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ffabienmillet%2FWiiFin)    Appearance settings    *     Platform        *     AI CODE CREATION      …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jellyfin is gaining significant momentum over Plex, evidenced by its rising popularity on platforms like TrueNAS and its expanding ecosystem of community-driven clients &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47760125&quot; title=&quot;Noticed that Jellyfin had inched out Plex when sorting by popularity on the TrueNAS app catalogue the other day (45,178 installs vs Plex&amp;#39;s 42,225).  The existance of this project seems to confirm that the dev ecosystem around it is getting stronger!&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47760192&quot; title=&quot;Jellyfin is great in that it just works. I managed to install it on Samsung TV with Tizen OS and it has been just solid experience for many years now.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While users appreciate Jellyfin&amp;#39;s simplicity and lack of bloat, debates persist regarding its security model; some recommend strict isolation via VPNs, while others argue that a standard reverse proxy is sufficient for most threat models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47760577&quot; title=&quot;Can anyone comment on the security of Jellyfin? When I had last looked into it, it seemed like Jellyfin had a somewhat weak security model that made me question switching family members to it from Plex.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47760863&quot; title=&quot;Don&amp;#39;t expose it to the internet unless you know what you&amp;#39;re doing, or put it on a VPS you don&amp;#39;t care about. Ideally keep it behind a VPN and give your family members access to it that way, and let local devices on your LAN connect to it without a VPN.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47761690&quot; title=&quot;For whatever reason people here and on Reddit will tell you that you need to have Jellyfin pass through five VPNs, otherwise nasty things will happen. Meanwhile the actual devs suggests simply setting up a reverse proxy, which you can do in two lines with Caddy: https://jellyfin.org/docs/general/post-install/networking/re...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47761884&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Reverse proxy itself will do barely any defense, what you need in combination is an authgate What’s your threat model?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Meanwhile, Plex faces criticism for prioritizing unwanted features over core user needs, though some power users still prefer its centralized authentication for managing remote family access &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47760642&quot; title=&quot;Plex could reverse this trend in a week if they decided to prioritize work on any feature that their core market actually wanted.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47760771&quot; title=&quot;What more does Plex need? I would consider myself a power user of Plex and it does everything I need it to do. I would think the only thing I can think of is fully self-hosted login instead of their cloud option, but I&amp;#39;m glad we have that option because I don&amp;#39;t want to handle the authentication of my friends and family&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47761737&quot; title=&quot;Reverse proxy itself will do barely any defense, what you need in combination is an authgate (authentik, authelia), and here we are moving from &amp;#39;simple reverse proxy&amp;#39; to fun weekend activity and then some getting it to work as expected. + it kills the app auth flow, so only web interface is suitable for this.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://substack.com/home/post/p-193626949&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I went to America&amp;#39;s worst national parks so you don&amp;#39;t have to&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (substack.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47751029&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;195 points · 182 comments · by surprisetalk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A veteran traveler critiques several major U.S. national parks for overcrowding and boredom, ultimately naming South Carolina&amp;#39;s Congaree the worst due to its stagnant water, extreme humidity, and aggressive mosquito infestations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://substack.com/home/post/p-193626949&quot; title=&quot;Title: I went to America&amp;#39;s worst national parks so you don&amp;#39;t have to    URL Source: https://substack.com/home/post/p-193626949    Markdown Content:  I have visited 65% of America’s national parks, 85% of the ones in the lower 48. These ones:    [![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely dismiss the author&amp;#39;s critiques as &amp;#34;trolling,&amp;#34; arguing that even the most crowded parks like Zion offer solitude if visitors venture beyond the &amp;#34;Disneyland&amp;#34; main attractions or hike more than two miles from trailheads &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47751554&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Every day hike in Zion Canyon is kind of like waiting in line at Disney World. You’re waiting in line in a magical place, but you’re still waiting in line. You ask a dead-eyed park ranger to recommend you a less popular hike, and he spits in your face. There is no such thing as a less-popular hike in Zion Canyon. You will wait in line on the trail and you will be grateful you piece of shit. Yeah, you can safely disregard anything this idiot says. This is simply not true. When I did the Zion…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47751947&quot; title=&quot;With most parks the crowds quickly disappear once you are 2 miles in. That&amp;#39;s the case pretty much all over the world. I remember in Iceland there were these huge crowds at a water fall close to the bus stop. I hiked 3 miles in to another similar waterfall. There we had less than 10 people.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47752427&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m from the West Coast. My national park experience includes Yosemite, Volcanoes, Arches, Zion, Bryce, Redwood, Crater Lake, and Lassen.  (I&amp;#39;ve technically also been to the Grand Canyon, but it was so foggy, it was more like going to the Sears Portrait Studio - you couldn&amp;#39;t even see the canyon.) I used to say &amp;#39;I&amp;#39;ve never been to a national park and wondered why it&amp;#39;s a national park - they all have an obvious and immediate majesty to them.&amp;#39; Then I went to Pinnacles, and Acadia. I&amp;#39;d honestly…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some acknowledge the grueling nature of the Grand Canyon&amp;#39;s switchbacks and the intense congestion at Zion during peak seasons, they maintain these sites possess an &amp;#34;immediate majesty&amp;#34; that the author fails to appreciate &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47751418&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Can you hike in the Grand Canyon? Yes, technically. You can walk along the rim, but the view won’t change; same damn canyon on one side, same damn parking lot on the other. There are trails that go down into the canyon, but they’re a trap. They are featureless steep inclines formed into endless switchbacks, and when they finally end, there’s nothing to do except go back up, which will be just as boring but three times as hard and might kill you. I’ve seen enough. From the Midwest so was…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47751308&quot; title=&quot;If you haven&amp;#39;t tortured yourself on the Devil&amp;#39;s Corkscrew switchbacks on the Bright Angel Trail at the Grand Canyon, on the hottest day of summer, have you really National Parked?? All joking aside, I disagree with the author regarding the Grand Canyon. Havasupai Gardens -- the verdant oasis at the bottom of the canyon, where you can camp and recharge -- is one of my favorite places I&amp;#39;ve camped. There are areas for wading and swimming, and the sounds of the night creatures is eerily beautiful.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47752589&quot; title=&quot;I just went to Zion last week. There was an hour long wait to get on the shuttles due to crowds. The River Walk trail to the Narrows was so congested you would bump into people. The Emerald pools was packed with people despite being a 500’ climb. It’s a very popular park during spring break.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Others suggest that state parks or less-famous national sites like Congaree often provide a superior, less-crowded experience compared to the &amp;#34;tourist traps&amp;#34; of major parks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47751796&quot; title=&quot;State parks are where it&amp;#39;s at. But love the Gatlinburg aside. It&amp;#39;s like Myrtle Beach, but worse. The Blue Ridge mountains have amazing natural beauty for miles in every direction. So many great towns too - Blowing Rock, Boone, Asheville, Maggie Valley, (hopefully Chimney Rock will be back on that list someday). Why anyone would pick Gatlinburg to visit is beyond me.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47751393&quot; title=&quot;I live in South Carolina, about half an hour from Congaree National Park. It&amp;#39;s not a place you&amp;#39;d drive across the country to see, but it&amp;#39;s beautiful and highly worth a visit. There are some freaky trees -- with knobs of roots that stick out from the ground, like nothing else I&amp;#39;ve seen. The place is kinda creepy, as if you&amp;#39;re about to be attacked by zombies, and I love that. There is a two mile elevated boardwalk which takes you around some of the most scenic areas of the park, and further…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jsomers.net/blog/the-paper-computer&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The paper computer&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jsomers.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47747770&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;288 points · 88 comments · by jsomers&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;James Somers explores the potential for advanced AI to enable a &amp;#34;paper computer&amp;#34; workflow, where physical objects like notebooks and cards serve as interfaces for digital tasks to reduce screen time and eliminate the distractions inherent in modern computing. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jsomers.net/blog/the-paper-computer&quot; title=&quot;Title: The paper computer « the jsomers.net blog    URL Source: https://jsomers.net/blog/the-paper-computer    Markdown Content:  # The paper computer « the jsomers.net blog    # the [jsomers.net](https://jsomers.net/) blog.    *   [About](https://jsomers.net/ &amp;#39;/&amp;#39;)  *   [Subscribe](https://jsomers.net/blog/feed &amp;#39;Subscribe&amp;#39;)  *   [Read More](https://jsomers.net/blog/archives &amp;#39;Archives&amp;#39;)  *   [Contact me](https://jsomers.net/contact &amp;#39;Contact&amp;#39;)    ### The paper computer    #### by James Somers, April 8, 2026    Now…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The concept of &amp;#34;Paper Computing&amp;#34; envisions using physical paper as a tangible, distraction-free interface for digital tasks, such as managing emails through pen-strokes or viewing live media projected onto pages &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47788736&quot; title=&quot;Paper Computing (great name!) is something I&amp;#39;ve been thinking about a lot to help my kids benefit from tech without exposing them to the brain melting addiction of screens. I sacrificed a few crazy nights of sleep to try to build a Paper Computer Agent prototype for a recent Gemini hackathon (only to disappointingly have submission issues right before the actual deadline) which my kids loved and keep asking me to set up permanently for them. It&amp;#39;s essentially a poor man&amp;#39;s hacked up DynamicLand -…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47790668&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Now that we have actually good AI, I have this vision of a form of computing that doesn’t involve me using a computer so much. Imagine you had the day’s emails to go through. It would be nice if the ones that required a simple decision could be dispatched with a few pen-strokes: I could write down a date that would work for that meeting; check a box to accept that invitation; etc. This reminds me of those predictions from 1900 about the year 2000, when they thought we&amp;#39;d all live in enormous…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47788456&quot; title=&quot;If I understand this correctly, you&amp;#39;re talking about using paper as a computing interface? That&amp;#39;s such a neat idea!&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents highlight its potential to reduce screen addiction for children and provide a more &amp;#34;freeing&amp;#34; experience than traditional displays &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47788736&quot; title=&quot;Paper Computing (great name!) is something I&amp;#39;ve been thinking about a lot to help my kids benefit from tech without exposing them to the brain melting addiction of screens. I sacrificed a few crazy nights of sleep to try to build a Paper Computer Agent prototype for a recent Gemini hackathon (only to disappointingly have submission issues right before the actual deadline) which my kids loved and keep asking me to set up permanently for them. It&amp;#39;s essentially a poor man&amp;#39;s hacked up DynamicLand -…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see this as a &amp;#34;rebirth of faxing&amp;#34; or a return to the skeuomorphic ideals of the Apple Newton &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47788634&quot; title=&quot;Receive email, render page with the email and a reply section and a unique ID, print it out physically Human picks up all the sheets out of the printer, writes out replies with pen Human puts the stack of answered email sheets in a multi-page scanner Scanner physically scans them, agent transcribes them and matches them back to the incoming emails via the unique ID on each sheet, sends replies You could adjust this flow for anything where human input is just one part of a larger sequence: just…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47791261&quot; title=&quot;To some degree, that&amp;#39;s what one had w/ Apple&amp;#39;s Newton Intelligence on the MessagePad --- it was &amp;#39;just&amp;#39; fancy pattern-matching, but mostly it worked, and the UI and implementation were quite good, and it kept me organized all through college.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47792028&quot; title=&quot;Mentioning the Newton may be anathema to the discussion (it seems to bring up the usual jokes, etc.) but I was thinking too that the Macintosh (or the Xerox Alto if you like, or the Mother of All Demos) tried to move us in that direction by &amp;#39;skeuomorphising&amp;#39; the computer interface—make it look like the more familiar &amp;#39;real world&amp;#39;. The Newton pushed further. It seems to have been on the mind of at least a few people at Apple. It sounds like the author is on the same track, has the same mindset.…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, skeptics argue that digital-first workflows are more efficient for long-term organization and that &amp;#34;actually good AI&amp;#34; should automate tasks entirely rather than just changing the format of human labor &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47790668&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Now that we have actually good AI, I have this vision of a form of computing that doesn’t involve me using a computer so much. Imagine you had the day’s emails to go through. It would be nice if the ones that required a simple decision could be dispatched with a few pen-strokes: I could write down a date that would work for that meeting; check a box to accept that invitation; etc. This reminds me of those predictions from 1900 about the year 2000, when they thought we&amp;#39;d all live in enormous…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47790925&quot; title=&quot;Since I have a laptop, I threw away all paper support, focusing on the keyboard as primary information interface. Using paper and space to organize ideas is nice, but that&amp;#39;s a niche use-case. And in any case, you&amp;#39;ll have to digitalize it anyway afterwards, so better start on the digital version immediately, and be good at it. Everytime I start a new project, I&amp;#39;m tempted to take a pencil and paper, but then I refrain and use draw.io or the like because I know it will be winning on the longer…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable inspirations for this vision include Bret Victor’s DynamicLand and the &amp;#34;Young Lady&amp;#39;s Illustrated Primer&amp;#34; from science fiction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47792028&quot; title=&quot;Mentioning the Newton may be anathema to the discussion (it seems to bring up the usual jokes, etc.) but I was thinking too that the Macintosh (or the Xerox Alto if you like, or the Mother of All Demos) tried to move us in that direction by &amp;#39;skeuomorphising&amp;#39; the computer interface—make it look like the more familiar &amp;#39;real world&amp;#39;. The Newton pushed further. It seems to have been on the mind of at least a few people at Apple. It sounds like the author is on the same track, has the same mindset.…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47788499&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, and it&amp;#39;s really worth checking out https://dynamicland.org/ , because Bret Victor is actually doing this -- slash pointing the way to what such a world could look like. It just seems like now might be a good time for specific smaller parts of that vision to be carved off and developed further. I say that largely because of the advances in multimodal AI, which maybe haven&amp;#39;t been fully applied yet in this area.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-04-12</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-04-12</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stevehanov.ca/blog/how-i-run-multiple-10k-mrr-companies-on-a-20month-tech-stack&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I run multiple $10K MRR companies on a $20/month tech stack&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (stevehanov.ca)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47736555&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;855 points · 470 comments · by tradertef&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author details a &amp;#34;lean&amp;#34; strategy for running multiple $10,000 MRR companies on a $20 monthly tech stack by utilizing a single virtual private server, Go for performance, SQLite for data, and local hardware or subsidized tools like GitHub Copilot to minimize AI costs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stevehanov.ca/blog/how-i-run-multiple-10k-mrr-companies-on-a-20month-tech-stack&quot; title=&quot;Title: How I run multiple $10K MRR companies on a $20/month tech stack    URL Source: https://stevehanov.ca/blog/how-i-run-multiple-10k-mrr-companies-on-a-20month-tech-stack    Markdown Content:  Last night, I was rejected from yet another pitch night. It was just the pre-interview, and the problem wasn&amp;#39;t my product. I already have MRR. I already have users who depend on it every day.    The feedback was simply: _&amp;#39;What do you even need funding for?&amp;#39;_    I hear this time and time again when I try to grow…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the viability of using SQLite and low-cost VPS hosting to run profitable businesses, with proponents arguing that modern hardware allows a single node to handle massive traffic without the &amp;#34;learned helplessness&amp;#34; of complex cloud architectures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737434&quot; title=&quot;If this sounds like basic advice, consider there are a lot of people out there that believe they have to start with serverless, kubernetes, fleets of servers, planet-scale databases, multi-zone high-availability setups, and many other &amp;#39;best practices&amp;#39;. Saying &amp;#39;you can just run things on a cheap VPS&amp;#39; sounds amateurish: people are immediately out with &amp;#39;Yeah but scaling&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;Yeah but high availability&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;Yeah but backups&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;Yeah but now you have to maintain it&amp;#39; arguments, that are basically…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738217&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; SQLite on the same machine is akin to calling fwrite. Actually 35% faster than fwrite [1]. &amp;gt; This is also a system constraint as it forces a one-database-per-instance design You can scale incredibly far on a single node and have much better up time than github or anthropic. At this rate maybe even AWS/cloudflare. &amp;gt; you need to serve traffic beyond your local region Postgres still has a single node that can write. So most of the time you end up region sharding anyway. Sharding SQLite is…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While SQLite offers significant performance advantages over PostgreSQL by eliminating network or socket overhead &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737886&quot; title=&quot;Sqlite smokes postgres on the same machine even with domain sockets [1]. This is before you get into using multiple sqlite database. What features postgres offers over sqlite in the context of running on a single machine with a monolithic app? Application functions [2] means you can extend it however you need with the same language you use to build your application. It also has a much better backup and replication story thanks to litestream [3]. - [1]…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737396&quot; title=&quot;Looks like the overhead is not insignificant: Running 100,000 `SELECT 1` queries:      PostgreSQL (localhost): 2.77 seconds      SQLite (in-memory): 0.07 seconds ( https://gist.github.com/leifkb/1ad16a741fd061216f074aedf1eca... )&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, critics argue that this approach creates scaling bottlenecks and &amp;#34;clever&amp;#34; state-syncing issues once an application requires multiple nodes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738020&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Sqlite smokes postgres on the same machine even with domain sockets [1]. SQLite on the same machine is akin to calling fwrite. That&amp;#39;s fine. This is also a system constraint as it forces a one-database-per-instance design, with no data shared across nodes. This is fine if you&amp;#39;re putting together a site for your neighborhood&amp;#39;s mom and pop shop, but once you need to handle a request baseline beyond a few hundreds TPS and you need to serve traffic beyond your local region then you have no…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47736979&quot; title=&quot;A lot of this advice is good or at least interesting. A lot of it is questionable. Python is completely fine for the backend. And using SQLite for your prod database is a bad idea, just use Postgres or similar.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite disagreements over database choice and language efficiency, there is a consensus that over-provisioning for &amp;#34;planet-scale&amp;#34; needs is often a distraction from core business goals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737434&quot; title=&quot;If this sounds like basic advice, consider there are a lot of people out there that believe they have to start with serverless, kubernetes, fleets of servers, planet-scale databases, multi-zone high-availability setups, and many other &amp;#39;best practices&amp;#39;. Saying &amp;#39;you can just run things on a cheap VPS&amp;#39; sounds amateurish: people are immediately out with &amp;#39;Yeah but scaling&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;Yeah but high availability&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;Yeah but backups&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;Yeah but now you have to maintain it&amp;#39; arguments, that are basically…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737244&quot; title=&quot;There are zero reasons to limit yourself to 1GB of RAM. By paying $20 instead of $5 you can get at least 8gb of RAM. You can use it for caches or a database that supports concurrent writes. The $15 difference won’t make any financial difference if you are trying to run a small business. Thinking about on how to fit everything on a $5 VPS does not help your business.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. To mitigate risks on cheap hardware, contributors emphasize the importance of automated backups via tools like Litestream and rigorous SSH hardening to prevent bot infections &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737886&quot; title=&quot;Sqlite smokes postgres on the same machine even with domain sockets [1]. This is before you get into using multiple sqlite database. What features postgres offers over sqlite in the context of running on a single machine with a monolithic app? Application functions [2] means you can extend it however you need with the same language you use to build your application. It also has a much better backup and replication story thanks to litestream [3]. - [1]…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737125&quot; title=&quot;Nice list! I&amp;#39;d say the SQLite with WAL is the biggest money saver mentioned. One note: you can absolutely use Python or Node just as well as Go. There&amp;#39;s Hetzner that offers 4GB RAM, 10TB network (then 1$/TB egress), 2CPUs machines for 5$. Two disclaimers for VPS: If you&amp;#39;re using a dedicated server instead of a cloud server, just don&amp;#39;t forget to backup DB to a Storage box often (3$ /mo for 1TB, use rsync). It&amp;#39;s a good practice either way, but cloud instances seem more reliable to hardware…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/45756&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Pro Max 5x quota exhausted in 1.5 hours despite moderate usage&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47739260&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;581 points · 528 comments · by cmaster11&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are reporting a bug where Claude Code&amp;#39;s Pro Max 5x quota is exhausted in under two hours, allegedly due to prompt cache misses and 1M context window overhead. Anthropic is investigating the issue, citing expensive cache misses and background session activity as primary contributors to the rapid token depletion. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/45756&quot; title=&quot;Title: [BUG] Pro Max 5x Quota Exhausted in 1.5 Hours Despite Moderate Usage    URL Source: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/45756    Published Time: 2026-04-09T13:54:47.000Z    Markdown Content:  # [BUG] Pro Max 5x Quota Exhausted in 1.5 Hours Despite Moderate Usage · Issue #45756 · anthropics/claude-code    [Skip to content](https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/45756#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [](https://github.com/)    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic&amp;#39;s Claude Code team attributes rapid quota exhaustion to prompt cache misses during long sessions and high token usage from background automations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47740541&quot; title=&quot;Hey all, Boris from the Claude Code team here. We&amp;#39;ve been investigating these reports, and a few of the top issues we&amp;#39;ve found are: 1. Prompt cache misses when using 1M token context window are expensive. Since Claude Code uses a 1 hour prompt cache window for the main agent, if you leave your computer for over an hour then continue a stale session, it&amp;#39;s often a full cache miss. To improve this, we have shipped a few UX improvements (eg. to nudge you to /clear before continuing a long stale…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While the team claims to be prioritizing user anecdotes over internal metrics to debug these issues, users report frustrating &amp;#34;exploration loops&amp;#34; and a perceived decline in model performance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47740541&quot; title=&quot;Hey all, Boris from the Claude Code team here. We&amp;#39;ve been investigating these reports, and a few of the top issues we&amp;#39;ve found are: 1. Prompt cache misses when using 1M token context window are expensive. Since Claude Code uses a 1 hour prompt cache window for the main agent, if you leave your computer for over an hour then continue a stale session, it&amp;#39;s often a full cache miss. To improve this, we have shipped a few UX improvements (eg. to nudge you to /clear before continuing a long stale…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47740970&quot; title=&quot;Boris, you&amp;#39;re seeing a ton of anecdotes here and Claude has done something that has affected a bunch of their most fervent users. Jeff Bezos famously said that if the anecdotes are contradicting the metrics, then the metrics are measuring the wrong things. I suggest you take the anecdotes here seriously and figure out where/why the metrics are wrong.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47739625&quot; title=&quot;Claude has gotten noticeably worse for me too. It goes into long exploration loops for 5+ minutes even when I point it to the exact files to inspect. Then 30 minutes later I hit session limits. Three sessions like that in a day, and suddenly 25% of the weekly limit is gone. I ended up buying the $100 Codex plan. So far it has been much more generous with usage and more accurate than Claude for the kind of work I do. That said, Codex has its own issues. Its personality can be a bit off-putting…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Consequently, some developers are migrating to competitors like Codex and Cursor, viewing the current instability and lack of SLAs as a sign that the era of subsidized, high-performance generative AI compute is ending &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47739625&quot; title=&quot;Claude has gotten noticeably worse for me too. It goes into long exploration loops for 5+ minutes even when I point it to the exact files to inspect. Then 30 minutes later I hit session limits. Three sessions like that in a day, and suddenly 25% of the weekly limit is gone. I ended up buying the $100 Codex plan. So far it has been much more generous with usage and more accurate than Claude for the kind of work I do. That said, Codex has its own issues. Its personality can be a bit off-putting…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47739622&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m afraid the music may be slowly fading at this party, and the lights will soon be turned on. We may very well look back on the last couple years as the golden era of subsidized GenAI compute. For those not in the Google Gemini/Antigravity sphere, over the last month or so that community has been experiencing nothing short of contempt from Google when attempting to address an apparent bait and switch on quota expectations for their pro and ultra customers (myself included). [1] While I…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47741197&quot; title=&quot;Man, expecting the minimal from companies who are supposed to deliver a pro... there is no SLA for any this, so you are right. Also, why is there no SLA?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738883&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tell HN: Docker pull fails in Spain due to football Cloudflare block&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738883&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;758 points · 289 comments · by littlecranky67&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users in Spain are reporting Docker pull failures caused by internet service providers blocking Cloudflare IP addresses to prevent illegal football streaming during live matches. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738883&quot; title=&quot;I just spent 1h+ debugging why my locally-hosted gitlab runner would fail to create pipelines. The gitlab job output would just display weird TLS errors when trying to pull a docker images. After debugging gitlab and the runner, I realized after a while I could not even run &amp;amp;quot;docker pull &amp;amp;lt;image&amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot; on my machine as root:&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;amp;gt; error pulling image configuration: download failed after attempts=6: tls: failed to verify certificate: x509: certificate is not valid for any names, but…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Spanish ISPs are blocking Cloudflare IP ranges during football matches to combat piracy, causing significant collateral damage to services like Docker Hub, GitHub, and smart home devices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47740148&quot; title=&quot;Heh, lucky you, at least you get a message. My ISP just drops traffic to the affected IPs. No ping, no traceroute, just a spinner in the browser until it says &amp;#39;page not found&amp;#39;. Every response and comment from LaLiga, the football organization responsible for this, has been so far that this is a minor issue that only affects a few bunch of nerds who talk about &amp;#39;docker images&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;github repositories&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;whatever that means&amp;#39;. Meanwhile, there are testimonies of smart home devices like anti-theft…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47739575&quot; title=&quot;They block the whole of Cloudflare R2, I believe the Docker hub is just (heh) a collateral. When the La Liga match starts, everything that&amp;#39;s proxied via CF (including zero access reverse tunnels) stops working. There&amp;#39;s even a website made for checking if the match is on: https://hayahora.futbol/ You can check if your host is affected: https://hayahora.futbol/#comprobador&amp;amp;domain=docker-images-pr...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47741180&quot; title=&quot;The football league would rather not have pirates livestream their ~90 minute games. Pirates would rather not be blocked, so they create a new, disposable website for every game. Any blocking must happen fast. Cloudflare would rather not block websites without a court order specifying the sites to be blocked. The courts would rather not create a special fast lane through the courts, just to resolve a squabble between two huge corporations.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest technical workarounds like VPNs or alternate DNS, others argue that this is a political issue of censorship that cannot be solved with clever code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47739423&quot; title=&quot;Time to use a VPN in your docker pipelines ;) Or run your systems outside of Spain. Or can this be avoided by using an alternate DNS?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47741539&quot; title=&quot;Perhaps its time to put a VPN into all your CI jobs&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47741830&quot; title=&quot;You can&amp;#39;t fight political issues with clever technical solutions&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable anecdotes include critical failures in anti-theft alarms and GPS tracking apps used for dementia patients, highlighting how these blocks impact personal safety beyond just &amp;#34;nerd&amp;#34; infrastructure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47740148&quot; title=&quot;Heh, lucky you, at least you get a message. My ISP just drops traffic to the affected IPs. No ping, no traceroute, just a spinner in the browser until it says &amp;#39;page not found&amp;#39;. Every response and comment from LaLiga, the football organization responsible for this, has been so far that this is a minor issue that only affects a few bunch of nerds who talk about &amp;#39;docker images&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;github repositories&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;whatever that means&amp;#39;. Meanwhile, there are testimonies of smart home devices like anti-theft…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thealgorithmicbridge.com/p/ai-will-be-met-with-violence-and&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI Will Be Met with Violence, and Nothing Good Will Come of It&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (thealgorithmicbridge.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737563&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;331 points · &lt;strong&gt;594 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by gHeadphone&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rising fears over job displacement and AI safety are fueling a surge in real-world violence and threats against industry leaders and infrastructure, echoing historical Luddite resistance as people increasingly target the human creators of technologies they find unreachable or threatening. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thealgorithmicbridge.com/p/ai-will-be-met-with-violence-and&quot; title=&quot;Title: AI Will Be Met With Violence, and Nothing Good Will Come of It    URL Source: https://www.thealgorithmicbridge.com/p/ai-will-be-met-with-violence-and    Published Time: 2026-04-11T19:23:52+00:00    Markdown Content:  [![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether the threat of violence stems from AI itself or from the &amp;#34;gleeful&amp;#34; displacement of labor and exacerbation of inequality by those in power &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47739230&quot; title=&quot;I feel like if people keep using AI as a blanket term for &amp;#39;inequality&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;inequality accelerants&amp;#39; then yeah, it&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;AI&amp;#39;&amp;#39;s fault. When in reality the whole thing needs to be decoupled.. &amp;#39;Gleefully taking away people&amp;#39;s livelihoods will be met with violence, and nothing good will come of it.&amp;#39; - fixed.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47739489&quot; title=&quot;I wholeheartedly agree with and encourage this kind of academic distinction. However... Until people with billions of dollars behind them do something with that money to offset the financial hardship that they&amp;#39;re knowingly - and gleefully - bringing to others... The distinction has no practical use. (And before someone says &amp;#39;that&amp;#39;s the government&amp;#39;s job!&amp;#39;, consider how much lobbying money is coming from CEOs and companies who know the domain best and are agitating for better financial and social…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737959&quot; title=&quot;Magic or no, ultimately &amp;#39;AI&amp;#39; leads to labour displacement and it&amp;#39;s just a continuation of the much broader trend of automation driven by computers. Labour displacement leads to an erosion of standards of living and in a world that ties purpose to work is an existential threat on a very practical level. It was always going to be met with violence once it became more than a curiosity for tinkerers.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that the distinction between technology and its owners is academic, others contend that the real issue is a lack of financial safeguards and the &amp;#34;politicized&amp;#34; way CEOs have introduced these tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47739489&quot; title=&quot;I wholeheartedly agree with and encourage this kind of academic distinction. However... Until people with billions of dollars behind them do something with that money to offset the financial hardship that they&amp;#39;re knowingly - and gleefully - bringing to others... The distinction has no practical use. (And before someone says &amp;#39;that&amp;#39;s the government&amp;#39;s job!&amp;#39;, consider how much lobbying money is coming from CEOs and companies who know the domain best and are agitating for better financial and social…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737764&quot; title=&quot;A lot of the magic of LLMs, I think, has been tarnished by these CEOs and other FAANG companies. It might have been a far more interesting world if they didn&amp;#39;t bring &amp;#39;AI&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;AGI&amp;#39; into the conversation in such a politicized way.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47739257&quot; title=&quot;How do you decouple it when the people who own it and are building it seem to be driven on increasing inequality?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Debates also touch on the feasibility of wealth redistribution to offset these harms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47739561&quot; title=&quot;How much actual money do you think the “people with billions of dollars” have in comparison to the needs of the population as a whole? I think you’re very confused about where the actual income in the economy goes.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47739644&quot; title=&quot;I am not at all proposing that &amp;#39;people with billions of dollars&amp;#39; somehow directly pay for &amp;#39;the needs of the population as a whole&amp;#39;. I&amp;#39;m considering &amp;#39;actual power&amp;#39;, rather than &amp;#39;actual income&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47739667&quot; title=&quot;Then who pays for it?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, with some viewing AI as an &amp;#34;alien&amp;#34; force that has exploited human greed to establish dominance over the race &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47739976&quot; title=&quot;History has shown that an alien invasion can only happen because of the internal competition and in-fighting of the natives. Colonial empires proved it only a few centuries back. The invading alien powers are fuelled by the inviting natives. AI (and computing technology in general) is an alien as it defies all wordly norms. It can have exact identical copies, can replicate, can exist everywhere, communicate across huge distance without time lapse, do huge work without time lapse, has no…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/46829&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Anthropic downgraded cache TTL on March 6th&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47736476&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;501 points · 389 comments · by lsdmtme&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic confirmed it intentionally changed the Claude Code prompt cache TTL from one hour to five minutes on March 6, 2026, as part of a server-side optimization that reduces costs for API users but has reportedly caused subscription users to hit quota limits faster. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/46829&quot; title=&quot;Title: Cache TTL silently regressed from 1h to 5m around early March 2026, causing quota and cost inflation    URL Source: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/46829    Published Time: 2026-04-12T01:49:09.000Z    Markdown Content:  # Cache TTL silently regressed from 1h to 5m around early March 2026, causing quota and cost inflation · Issue #46829 · anthropics/claude-code    [Skip to content](https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/46829#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Engineers report a sharp decline in sentiment toward Anthropic, citing &amp;#34;stealth&amp;#34; nerfs to model reasoning, reduced response lengths, and the banning of third-party harnesses &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737485&quot; title=&quot;Has anybody else noticed a pretty significant shift in sentiment when discussing Claude/Codex with other engineers since even just a few months ago? Specifically because of the secret/hidden nature of these changes. I keep getting the sense that people feel like they have no idea if they are getting the product that they originally paid for, or something much weaker, and this sentiment seems to be constantly spreading. Like when I hear Anthropic mentioned in the past few weeks, it&amp;#39;s almost…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737815&quot; title=&quot;Well, off the top of my head: - Banning OpenClaw users (within their rights, of course, but bad optics) - Banning 3rd party harnesses in general (ditto) (claude -p still works on the sub but I get the feeling like if I actually use it, I&amp;#39;ll get my Anthropic acct. nuked. Would be great to get some clarity on this. If I invoke it from my Telegram bot, is that an unauthorized 3rd party harness?) - Lowering reasoning effort (and then showing up here saying &amp;#39;we&amp;#39;ll try to make sure the most valuable…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate whether this perceived degradation is a result of cost-cutting measures or the fading novelty of new models, many users are switching to competitors like Codex for coding tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737815&quot; title=&quot;Well, off the top of my head: - Banning OpenClaw users (within their rights, of course, but bad optics) - Banning 3rd party harnesses in general (ditto) (claude -p still works on the sub but I get the feeling like if I actually use it, I&amp;#39;ll get my Anthropic acct. nuked. Would be great to get some clarity on this. If I invoke it from my Telegram bot, is that an unauthorized 3rd party harness?) - Lowering reasoning effort (and then showing up here saying &amp;#39;we&amp;#39;ll try to make sure the most valuable…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737464&quot; title=&quot;On slightly off topic note: Codex is absolutely fantastic right now. I&amp;#39;m constantly in awe since switching from Claude a week ago.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737536&quot; title=&quot;Yeah I’ve seen this too. It’s difficult for me to tell if the complaints are due to a legitimate undisclosed nerf of Claude, or whether it’s just the initial awe of Opus 4.6 fading and people increasingly noticing its mistakes.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable anecdotes highlight the risks of over-reliance on these tools, such as a company that fired its test engineers and canceled IDE subscriptions only to face massive token costs and declining model performance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737896&quot; title=&quot;A month ago the company I work at with over 400 engineers decided to cancel all IDE subscriptions (Visual Studio, JetBrains, Windsurf, etc.) and move everyone over to Claude Code as a &amp;#39;cost-saving measure&amp;#39; (along with firing a bunch of test engineers). There was no migration plan - the EVP of Technology just gave a demo showing 2 greenfield projects he&amp;#39;d built with Claude Opus over a weekend and told everyone to copy how he worked. A week later the EVP had to send out an email telling people to…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738203&quot; title=&quot;Pretty bad decision on his part. I&amp;#39;ve been telling other engineers within my company who felt threatened by AI that this would happen. That prices would rise and the marginal cost for changes to big codebases would start to exceed the cost of an engineer&amp;#39;s salary. API credits are expensive, especially for huge contexts, and sometimes the model will use $200 in credits trying to solve a problem that could be fixed in an hour by a good engineer with enough context. It kind of reminds me of the…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.the-independent.com/tech/renewable-energy-solar-nepal-bhutan-iceland-b2533699.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Seven countries now generate nearly all their electricity from renewables (2024)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (the-independent.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47739313&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;548 points · 290 comments · by mpweiher&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.the-independent.com/tech/renewable-energy-solar-nepal-bhutan-iceland-b2533699.html&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The seven countries cited rely almost exclusively on hydroelectric and geothermal power, leading commenters to argue that their success is a result of a &amp;#34;geographical lottery&amp;#34; rather than a replicable model for most nations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47740465&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Albania, Bhutan, Nepal, Paraguay, Iceland, Ethiopia and the Democratic Republic of Congo produced more than 99.7 per cent of the electricity they consumed using geothermal, hydro, solar or wind power. Let&amp;#39;s head to electricitymaps.com ! Albania ( https://app.electricitymaps.com/map/zone/AL/live/fifteen_min... ) - On 2026-04-12 16:45 GMT+2, 22,67% of electricity consumed by Albania is imported from Greece, which generates 22% of its electricity from gas. Interestingly, Albania exports about as…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47739730&quot; title=&quot;Specifically Albania, Bhutan, Nepal, Paraguay, Iceland, Ethiopia and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Not to downplay the positive steps that are being taken towards using renewable energy worldwide, but one must point out that all those countries except one are almost exclusively using hydroelectric power, whose availability at such scale is a geographical lottery. As for Iceland, which also relies mostly on hydroelectric power but not in such great a proportion, it makes up for it thanks to…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While these systems are susceptible to droughts—requiring expensive backups like Albania&amp;#39;s floating oil plants—some argue that broader wins are being seen in regions like California and Spain through wind and solar &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47740805&quot; title=&quot;I guess somewhat of a fun fact: Albania has rented(!) two floating(!) oil-powered power plants near the city of Vlöre that are there in case of emergency. The last time they were really needed was in 2022 (if I remember correctly), but these days they&amp;#39;re not turned on any more than they need to be to make sure they&amp;#39;re operating properly. That very expensive backup system is basically the only non-renewable source in the whole country, and most of the time it&amp;#39;s just sitting there doing nothing.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47741123&quot; title=&quot;Pushback against the outliers of small + blessed with hydro and geothermal is overshadowing real wins: - California: 83% renewable, dominated by solar - Spain: 73%, dominated by solar &amp;amp; wind - Portugal: 90%, dominated by wind &amp;amp; solar - The Netherlands: 86%, dominated by solar &amp;amp; wind - Great Britain: 71%, dominated by wind &amp;amp; solar There&amp;#39;s real momentum happening.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Debates persist regarding the future of the grid, with some advocating for nuclear as a reliable baseload while others claim its high costs and long construction times make it economically unviable compared to battery storage and HVDC transmission &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47740973&quot; title=&quot;And this is an expected problem with renewables that can be engineered around. It&amp;#39;s unlikely the whole world has a drought at once during a calm night, so developing ways to transmit power long distances will be important.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47741562&quot; title=&quot;Or just use nuclear as base load, and battery storage as much as you can.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742041&quot; title=&quot;The economics of new nuclear plants don&amp;#39;t make sense. They take too long to build and cost too much. By the time a new plant is ready, alternate sources (likely solar + battery and long-distance HVDC) will have eaten its lunch.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742756&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; They take too long to build and cost too much. The global average to build one is ~7 years. People have been saying they take too long to build as an excuse for not building them for what, two decades or more? It seems to be taking longer to not build them than to build them. &amp;gt; By the time a new plant is ready, alternate sources (likely solar + battery and long-distance HVDC) will have eaten its lunch. Neither of those have the same purpose. Solar + battery lets you generate power with solar…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://essays.johnloeber.com/p/4-bring-back-idiomatic-design&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bring Back Idiomatic Design (2023)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (essays.johnloeber.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738827&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;509 points · 273 comments · by phil294&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;John Loeber argues for a return to &amp;#34;idiomatic design,&amp;#34; lamenting how the shift from consistent desktop software interfaces to fragmented web applications has sacrificed user intuition and efficiency for unique, non-standardized digital experiences. &lt;a href=&quot;https://essays.johnloeber.com/p/4-bring-back-idiomatic-design&quot; title=&quot;Title: #4: Bring Back Idiomatic Design    URL Source: https://essays.johnloeber.com/p/4-bring-back-idiomatic-design    Published Time: 2023-02-27T00:47:35+00:00    Markdown Content:  I’m part of the _desktop software_ generation. From Windows 95 to Windows 7, I grew using mostly-offline software on computers operated via mouse and keyboard, well before tablets and smartphones. Recently, I’ve been missing one particular part of that era: its consistency in design. I want to tell you about _idiomatic…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The decline of idiomatic design is attributed to the lack of unified system frameworks on the web, forcing developers to &amp;#34;roll their own&amp;#34; controls rather than using standardized APIs like Win32 or AppKit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47740863&quot; title=&quot;As the author identifies, the idioms come from the use of system frameworks that steer you towards idiomatic implementations. The system UI frameworks are tremendously detailed and handle so many corner cases you&amp;#39;d never think of. They allow you to graduate into being a power user over time. Windows has Win32, and it was easier to use its controls than rolling your own custom ones. (Shame they left the UI side of win32 to rot) macOS has AppKit, which enforces a ton. You can&amp;#39;t change the height…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47741397&quot; title=&quot;The author may have identified that &amp;#39;the idioms come from the use of system frameworks&amp;#39;, but they absolutely got wrong just about everything about why apps are not consistent on the web (e.g. I was baffled by their reasons listed under &amp;#39;this lack of homogeneity is for two reasons&amp;#39; section). First, what he calls &amp;#39;the desktop era&amp;#39; wasn&amp;#39;t so much a desktop era as a Windows era - Windows ran the vast majority of desktops (and furthermore, there were plenty of inconsistencies between Windows and…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. This fragmentation leads to inconsistent user experiences, such as conflicting keyboard shortcuts for submitting text and over-engineered date pickers that prevent simple manual entry &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47741481&quot; title=&quot;In text boxes in some applications, enter submits the entered text, and ctrl-enter forces a newline  (not at my computer, but I think Slack does this). In others, it&amp;#39;s the other way around (pretty sure GitHub does this for comments). I don&amp;#39;t know how we got here and I don&amp;#39;t know how to fix it, but &amp;#39;bring back idiomatic design&amp;#39; doesn&amp;#39;t help when we don&amp;#39;t have enough idioms. I&amp;#39;m not even sure if those two behaviors are wrong to be inconsistent: you&amp;#39;re probably more likely to want fancier…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47740150&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; There are hundreds of ways that different websites ask you to pick dates Ugh, date pickers. So many of these violently throw up when I try to do the obvious thing: type in the damn date. Instead they force me to click through their inane menu, as if the designer wanted to force me into a showcase of their work. Let your power users type. Just call your user’s attention back to the field if they accidentally typed 03/142/026.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742129&quot; title=&quot;Decades ago, Return and Enter were two different keys for that reason: Return to insert a line break, Enter to submit your input. Given the reduction to a single key, the traditional GUI rule is that Enter in a multiline/multi-paragraph input doesn’t submit like it does in other contexts, but inserts a line break (or paragraph break), while Ctrl+Enter submits. Chat apps, where single-paragraph content is the typical case, tend to reverse this. Good apps make this configurable.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some blame this on inexperienced management and dark patterns, others argue that modern web development requires balancing complex accessibility, security, and internationalization needs that standard HTML elements cannot always solve &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47740455&quot; title=&quot;Most software is not designed by intelligent and thoughtful people anymore. It is designed by hastily promoted middle manager PM/Product type people who, as has been mentioned elsewhere, simply were not around when thoughtful human interface design was borderline mandatory for efficiency’s sake. There is incompetence and there is also malevolence in the encouragement of dark patterns by the revenue side of the business.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47740291&quot; title=&quot;Is 03/04/2026 March 4th or the 3rd of April? If you have an international audience that’s going to mess someone up. Better yet require YYYY-MM-DD.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742637&quot; title=&quot;This is reductionist and myopic. I&amp;#39;ve personally been through building forms online and it&amp;#39;s hell to try to find consensus on perhaps the most common forms used online. Let&amp;#39;s take a credit card form: - Do I let the user copy and paste values in? - Do I let them use IE6? - Do I need to test for the user using an esotoric browser (Brave) with an esoteric password manager (KeePassXC)? - Do I make it accessible for someone&amp;#39;s OpenClaw bot to use it? - Do I make it inaccessible to a nefarious actor…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47741527&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ask HN: What Are You Working On? (April 2026)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47741527&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;181 points · &lt;strong&gt;532 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by david927&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This Hacker News thread invites community members to share their current projects, side hustles, and emerging ideas for the month of April 2026. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47741527&quot; title=&quot;What are you working on?  Any new ideas that you&amp;amp;#x27;re thinking about?&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The April 2026 &amp;#34;What Are You Working On&amp;#34; thread features a diverse array of technical projects, ranging from a daily word puzzle with thousands of players &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47744920&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m continuing to hack on Tiled Words, my daily word puzzle! https://tiledwords.com After winning the Playlin Player&amp;#39;s Choice award I&amp;#39;ve noticed an uptick in players as well as some people sharing videos on YouTube which has been fun. I&amp;#39;ve got a few thousand people playing every day. I just launched user accounts today so user&amp;#39;s can now track their progress across devices and share their stats with each other. This ended up being a bigger chunk of work than I expected but I&amp;#39;m really pleased…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; to a userspace WireGuard relay designed to bypass corporate laptop restrictions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47747939&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m building Tela ( https://github.com/paulmooreparks/tela ), a self-hosted relay that tunnels TCP services through encrypted WireGuard connections. The key difference from Tailscale and similar tools is that it requires no TUN adapter, no root access, and no admin privileges on either end. It runs entirely in userspace. My initial motivation was wanting to RDP and SSH into my home workstation from a locked-down corporate laptop when I travel. I couldn&amp;#39;t install Tailscale on the laptop, and I…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Several developers are focused on practical utility, such as a UK rail journey planner that runs entirely offline &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47744257&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m working on a fully offline, client-side train journey planner for UK rail - https://railraptor.com When booking flights, I use sites like Kiwi and Skyscanner that let you do flexible searches - multiple destinations, custom connections, creative routes, etc. But rail search feels oddly constrained. All the UK train operators offer basically the same experience, and surface the exact same routes. I always suspected there were better or just different options that weren’t being shown. Where…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, a virtual machine designed to match container startup speeds &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47745536&quot; title=&quot;I am building a virtual machine that starts as fast as containers and can be made portable and easy to use like containers. free, open source -&amp;gt; https://github.com/smol-machines/smolvm I worked with firecracker a lot back in the day and realized it was a pain to use. And containers had a lot of gotchas too. Since sandboxing is all the rage now - I think it&amp;#39;d be a better infra primitive than firecracker that works locally/remote and etc.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, and an mmWave-based monitoring system for elderly safety &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47745676&quot; title=&quot;My mother is living alone in her house and we are getting to the point where she might not be able to live alone.  I built &amp;#39;Still Kicking&amp;#39;, a picture frame that monitors her motion and sends back basic reports and can detect falls and sleep quality to a phone app, to help give her more time at home. It&amp;#39;s just an mmWave sensor connected to an ESP32.  But it works nicely, and I&amp;#39;m thinking of starting a company making them, though I&amp;#39;m not clear if the elderly would be ok with this minimal (no…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Amidst these innovations, there is notable concern regarding the job market for junior engineers, with some finding it difficult to secure interviews or maintain individual contributor roles during company restructuring &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47746348&quot; title=&quot;Trying to figure out how to get a job in this market for someone with sub 3 YoE in the industry :/ It&amp;#39;s hard out there for juniors, y&amp;#39;all. I&amp;#39;m working at a company that I thought I could stay for years in, but my CTO left and now I&amp;#39;m shafted with basically all of their responsibilities - I&amp;#39;m not overly perturbed by this, as it&amp;#39;s well within my ability, but I would much rather spend the next few years as an IC and really develop my skills as a SWE rather than jumping to manager this early...…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bsky.app/profile/serenityforge.com/post/3mj3r4nbiws2t&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Google removes &amp;quot;Doki Doki Literature Club&amp;quot; from Google Play&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bsky.app)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743730&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;390 points · 189 comments · by super256&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Publisher Serenity Forge has issued a statement confirming that Google has removed the game &amp;#34;Doki Doki Literature Club&amp;#34; from the Google Play Store. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bsky.app/profile/serenityforge.com/post/3mj3r4nbiws2t&quot; title=&quot;Serenity Forge (@serenityforge.com)    A statement regarding the removal of DDLC from the Google Play Store:    # JavaScript Required    This is a heavily interactive web application, and JavaScript is required. Simple HTML interfaces are possible, but that is not what this is.    Learn more about Bluesky at [bsky.social](https://bsky.social) and [atproto.com](https://atproto.com).    ### Post    Serenity Forge    serenityforge.com    did:plc:vnea37icaea6aufss6n4vpo4    A statement regarding the removal of DDLC…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The removal of *Doki Doki Literature Club* from Google Play has sparked a debate over the &amp;#34;global control&amp;#34; exerted by a few corporations over artistic expression and device ownership &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47744135&quot; title=&quot;1bil+ people have surrendered their right to artistic expression to Google, and another 1bil+ to Apple, and another 1bil+ to Microsoft. Many more billions have surrendered it to Visa and Mastercard. The world will only continue to get worse for the foreseeable future as five corporations assert global control over what is allowed to be published. It is mournful knowing that humanity&amp;#39;s peak is behind us.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47745525&quot; title=&quot;We do not need our hyperscaler minders telling us what content we can and cannot consume. This ought to be grounds to litigate antitrust. This should not be happening. We need web-based app installs without scare walls (&amp;#39;downloading from the internet is dangerous&amp;#39;), without hidden settings menus to enable them (&amp;#39;Settings &amp;gt; Apps &amp;gt; Special app access &amp;gt; Install unknown apps&amp;#39;), and without any interference or meddling from the hyperscalers. Tyranny of defaults = 0.00001% of users will ever fall…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that the game&amp;#39;s disturbing content justifies age ratings, others point out that the developers already provide clear warnings and that similar content remains accessible on platforms like Netflix &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47744198&quot; title=&quot;Just want to drive by and mention - a friend told me to play DDLC and I was highly skeptical given the anime pin-up girl art style. I eventually gave in and gave it a shot. It&amp;#39;s an amazing &amp;#39;playable story&amp;#39; unlike anything I have ever played. Super creative and well worth the couple hours it takes to play. I think it could use a few trigger warnings and it should be rated PG-13 / R, but there&amp;#39;s stuff on Netflix 10x more disturbing so I don&amp;#39;t quite grok the Google push back on this one.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47745358&quot; title=&quot;The official website states on the front page: This game is not suitable for children or those who are easily disturbed.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights the technical sophistication of the game&amp;#39;s engine, Ren&amp;#39;Py, and notes that while some regions are developing payment alternatives to bypass corporate duopolies, the &amp;#34;tyranny of defaults&amp;#34; on mobile OSs continues to stifle competition &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47744231&quot; title=&quot;Brazil and India have created alternatives to Mastercard/Visa duopoly. EU is seeking to do the same.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47744435&quot; title=&quot;Many countries have alternatives already. In Poland Blik is ubiquitous and very very easy to use. And I love how it&amp;#39;s implemented, Visa and MasterCard could learn from it. Tldr - you open the app on your phone and it gives you a 6 digit BLIK code, you give that code to the seller, then a notification comes up on the app saying &amp;#39;seller X is trying to debit your account by amount Y, agree?&amp;#39;. It&amp;#39;s brilliant because then the seller gets nothing identifiable about you. Even if someone overhears the…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47745525&quot; title=&quot;We do not need our hyperscaler minders telling us what content we can and cannot consume. This ought to be grounds to litigate antitrust. This should not be happening. We need web-based app installs without scare walls (&amp;#39;downloading from the internet is dangerous&amp;#39;), without hidden settings menus to enable them (&amp;#39;Settings &amp;gt; Apps &amp;gt; Special app access &amp;gt; Install unknown apps&amp;#39;), and without any interference or meddling from the hyperscalers. Tyranny of defaults = 0.00001% of users will ever fall…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47744941&quot; title=&quot;And it&amp;#39;s also one of the most impressive displays of RenPy&amp;#39;s capabilities you&amp;#39;ll ever see. Plenty of games do amazing things with ren&amp;#39;py that you wouldn&amp;#39;t think were possible just by looking at the dialogue DSL. Maps, HUDs, minigames, incredibly dynamic pathways through the game. But DDLC takes it to a different level, partly by looking so &amp;#39;normal&amp;#39; on its surface. In college I made some spare cash writing Ren&amp;#39;py games for some creatives online who had the writing and illustration chops, but…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/12/ios_passcode_bug/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apple update looks like Czech mate for locked-out iPhone user&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theregister.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737383&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;327 points · 211 comments · by OuterVale&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An iPhone user has been locked out of his device after an iOS update removed the &amp;#34;háček&amp;#34; character from the lock-screen keyboard, preventing him from entering his alphanumeric passcode. Because the data is not backed up, the user faces losing his files if the device is restored. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/12/ios_passcode_bug/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Apple update looks like Czech mate for locked-out iPhone user    URL Source: https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/12/ios_passcode_bug/    Published Time: 2026-04-12T08:01:09Z    Markdown Content:  # Apple update turns Czech mate for locked-out iPhone user • The Register    [The Register Home Page![Image 1](https://cdn.theregister.com/assets/images/the_register_logo.6befe899.svg)![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary consensus is that Apple’s removal of a specific Czech character from the keyboard highlights a failure to prioritize &amp;#34;userspace&amp;#34; stability and the needs of non-English speakers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737595&quot; title=&quot;after Apple removed a character from its Czech keyboard I wonder what the thought process (or perhaps lack thereof) at Apple was. Did no one of the likely-somewhat-large team who did that think &amp;#39;wait, this could lock out our users who may have used that character&amp;#39;? In the immortal words of Linus Torvalds: &amp;#39;WE DO NOT BREAK USERSPACE!&amp;#39; Now one of the ways in might be those companies who claim to be able to break iPhone security for law enforcement and the like, but I&amp;#39;m not sure if they&amp;#39;d be…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737627&quot; title=&quot;As a non-English speaker I can really relate to this. I think the real mistake was Apple allowing to enter a non-ASCII password in the first place. E.g. on macOS the password fields have been locked to English character set, and I&amp;#39;m not sure why it changed on iOS.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738351&quot; title=&quot;Majority of California based companies employee English only or English and Spanish speakers possibly with some Indian language as well. This leads to lots of problems when you are bilingual or bilingual in other languages such as German in French. Neither Apple nor Microsoft under this sort of language swapping well. Never mind rarer languages like Czech or Greek.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this underscores the necessity of cross-provider backups &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737737&quot; title=&quot;I think the biggest lesson here is to back up. The reason for losing access to the phone is amazingly dumb but it could have fallen down the stairs for basically the same effect. And do your could backups cross-provider. You never know what the &amp;#39;big players&amp;#39; are going to pull, and your lifetime customer value is less than the cost of a single support call.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that Apple’s refusal to allow OS downgrades—intended as a security measure—effectively traps users when such software regressions occur &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738531&quot; title=&quot;Biggest lesson is Apple should allow you to downgrade OS, especially on old devices. Or release some sort of open version once device is EOL&amp;#39;d.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738729&quot; title=&quot;Then an attacker could load an older, exploitable OS and gain access.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738973&quot; title=&quot;Weirdly I care more about my rights as the owner of the device than the rights of a theoretical attacker.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. A notable concern is that even if Apple restores the character in a future update, the user may be unable to install it without first unlocking the device &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737652&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Byrne was hoping that the next update, 26.4.1, would introduce a fix for this, but its release this week has not helped. Even if Apple restores the háček in a future update, wouldn&amp;#39;t he still need to unlock the iPhone to install it?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://maps.apple.com/frame?center=33.723388%2C35.614698&amp;amp;span=1.983925%2C4.004193&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apple has removed most of the towns and villages in Lebanon from Apple maps?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (maps.apple.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742680&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;316 points · 176 comments · by thepasswordis&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple Maps has reportedly removed the names of numerous towns and villages across Lebanon from its platform, leaving large areas of the country&amp;#39;s map data blank. &lt;a href=&quot;https://maps.apple.com/frame?center=33.723388%2C35.614698&amp;span=1.983925%2C4.004193&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;x.com&amp;amp;#x2F;EthanLevins2&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2043366941922926940&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;x.com&amp;amp;#x2F;EthanLevins2&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2043366941922926940&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on reports that Apple Maps has removed numerous locations in Lebanon, with some users questioning if this occurred at the request of the U.S. government &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742829&quot; title=&quot;This reminds me a bit of the Gulf of America fiasco from last year where if you changed your location to outside the US it would go back to showing Gulf of Mexico. I&amp;#39;m not sure why they would do this for US users unless the US government requested it.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742773&quot; title=&quot;Any justification given by Apple?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters view the move through the lens of regional conflict and geopolitical pressure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742873&quot; title=&quot;Israel is really out there just killing everyone in the middle east&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47744762&quot; title=&quot;Israel is done being on the receiving end of the Iranian octopus. No more Iranian missiles, rockets, drones, or Iranian funded and directed Islamist terrorists on its borders. Only Syria is an exception: there, it was internal Druze pressure on the Israeli government to act to protect their brothers in Syria.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47744504&quot; title=&quot;Since when has war not been awful? I don’t remember anyone complaining when Hezbollah attacks Israel though.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others note that digital maps frequently reflect disputed territories and varying international recognitions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743524&quot; title=&quot;Google maps has done this forever. A good chunk of countries have disputed territories, and never in human history there has been a &amp;#39;universal&amp;#39; map that everybody agrees on.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47744121&quot; title=&quot;Sure, but I&amp;#39;m in the US, which is not a party to the conflict between Israel and Lebanon. To my knowledge the US continues to recognize Lebanon as a sovereign country.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The thread also highlights a sense of powerlessness among observers regarding the broader humanitarian and political implications of the ongoing violence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742800&quot; title=&quot;This saddens me and I don’t understand why it is allowed to continue. And I’m not just talking about Apple Maps.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742945&quot; title=&quot;This saddens me as well, because that&amp;#39;s the type of thing that happens every day where I live, but... &amp;gt; I don’t understand why it is allowed to continue. The answer is even sadder. It&amp;#39;s even worse. And it is as follows: because there&amp;#39;s not enough people who are taking action, and from those taking action there&amp;#39;s not enough people in power to change something significantly. At least that&amp;#39;s how I see it. And... I can&amp;#39;t even blame those who don&amp;#39;t take action - because many people feel completely…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://boringbar.app/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: boringBar – a taskbar-style dock replacement for macOS&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (boringbar.app)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742200&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;310 points · 178 comments · by a-ve&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer has launched boringBar, a macOS taskbar replacement designed to mimic GNOME and Windows by displaying only active windows in the current workspace while offering space switching, window previews, and a searchable app launcher. &lt;a href=&quot;https://boringbar.app/&quot; title=&quot;Hi HN!&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;I recently switched from a Fedora&amp;amp;#x2F;GNOME laptop to a MacBook Air. My old setup served me well as a portable workstation, but I’ve started traveling more while working remotely and needed something with similar performance but better battery life. The main thing I missed was a simple taskbar that shows the windows in the current workspace instead of a Dock that mixes everything together.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;I built boringBar so I would not have to use the Dock. It shows only the windows in the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The initial release of boringBar sparked a heated debate over its subscription model, with many users arguing that utility software should be a one-time purchase to ensure longevity and avoid &amp;#34;subscription fatigue&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742559&quot; title=&quot;I am the target audience for this, from a UX and tech perspective. It addresses a problem I have and for which I periodically audition solutions. A subscription for a menu bar, though, kills it for me. I have apps on Macs that are over 20 years old. Some of those companies don’t exist anymore. I’m not going to risk paying $100 for a decade of your app and hope that your company, or your goodwill, stays around that long.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742616&quot; title=&quot;While I don&amp;#39;t use a Mac as my primary anymore, I&amp;#39;m surprised I like the look of this! It actually looks quite Mac-like as well. Subscription is a big nope here, though. Especially for Mac software, I&amp;#39;d expect something where you pay for one major version, that is guaranteed to works on specific macOS versions, and gets minor bugfix updates too. But maybe the next macOS version requires a newer major version update to run, in which case you pay an upgrade fee to buy the next major version - or…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743097&quot; title=&quot;I 100% understand why you are using a subscription-based model. It makes sense, and I agree it&amp;#39;s the most honest model given that you have to continually support it and you don&amp;#39;t want to have to either over-promise on extended support, and offer refunds if you can&amp;#39;t fulfill that promise. I just hate managing subscriptions. If you gave me the option to require manual subscription renewal, rather than auto-renewal, I would 100% buy this right now. Basically allow me to purchase for 1 year then…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. In response to this feedback, the developer pivoted to a perpetual license for personal use, though they maintained that recurring revenue is necessary to support the ongoing maintenance required by frequent macOS updates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47744059&quot; title=&quot;Since this is the top comment as of now - hijacking this to introduce a change to pricing: ------ OP here - based on the feedback, I’ve switched boringBar to a perpetual license for personal use: https://boringbar.app It’s now $40 for 2 devices and includes 2 years of updates. After that, you can keep using the version you have, or choose to pay for updates again later. For businesses, I’m keeping the existing annual pricing. A lot of the comments on pricing were fair, and I appreciate people…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742729&quot; title=&quot;I think that’s a fair question. My thinking is pretty simple: most people will probably choose the basic 2-device plan, which works out to about $0.85 per month. For an app like this, I think that is a reasonable price. Another reason is that a lot of Mac apps charge a one-time fee upfront, but then require paid upgrades later. In practice, that often ends up being similar to paying for a few years of ongoing support anyway. I also think a low-cost subscription sets a clearer expectation that…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742763&quot; title=&quot;Adding on to this, apps that hook into window management and multi-monitor behavior can break in subtle ways over time. I ran into some of that with uBar on my setup, especially around multi-monitor use and waking from sleep, and I wanted boringBar’s pricing to match the expectation of continued support and fixes.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some critics noted that similar taskbar functionality has long been free on Linux, others defended the pricing as reasonable for a polished, Mac-native experience &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742719&quot; title=&quot;Ah, good old Apple, where for only $9.99 a month, you can experience what Linux offered for free 15+ years ago.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743023&quot; title=&quot;Not really true if what you want is a full macOS-style desktop experience with a few choice features from elsewhere bolted on. Linux desktops are predominantly Windows-style or minimal tiling thing, with the exceptions (GNOME, Pantheon) bearing only surface-level Mac aesthetics and being more comparable to superpowered tablet OS experiences.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742837&quot; title=&quot;Please don&amp;#39;t overindex on this comment OP, $10 a year is completely reasonable and the status quo they describe has killed so much software for so little benefit It&amp;#39;s a subscription with extra steps and worse retention.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bcantrill.dtrace.org/2026/04/12/the-peril-of-laziness-lost/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The peril of laziness lost&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bcantrill.dtrace.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743628&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;366 points · 122 comments · by gpm&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bryan Cantrill argues that LLMs lack the &amp;#34;virtue of laziness&amp;#34; essential to good software design, warning that without human-driven abstraction and simplification, AI tools will prioritize high code volume over system quality and efficiency. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bcantrill.dtrace.org/2026/04/12/the-peril-of-laziness-lost/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The peril of laziness lost    URL Source: https://bcantrill.dtrace.org/2026/04/12/the-peril-of-laziness-lost/    Published Time: 2026-04-12    Markdown Content:  # The peril of laziness lost | The Observation Deck    [](https://bcantrill.dtrace.org/)- [x]     *   [About](https://bcantrill.dtrace.org/about/)  *   |    [](https://bcantrill.dtrace.org/2026/04/12/the-peril-of-laziness-lost/#)    # The peril of laziness lost     Apr 12, 2026     In his classic [_Programming…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion critiques the trend of using LLMs to generate massive volumes of code, arguing that &amp;#34;vibe coding&amp;#34; often results in low-value output, bloated software, and redundant or ineffective test suites &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47744356&quot; title=&quot;As dumb as it is to loudly proclaim you wrote 200k loc last week with an LLM, I don’t think it’s much better to look at the code someone else wrote with an LLM and go “hah! Look at how stupid it is!” You’re making exactly the same error as the other guy, just in the opposite direction: you’re judging the profession of software engineering based on code output rather than value generation. Now, did Garry Tan actually produce anything of value that week? I dunno, you’ll have to ask him.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47744628&quot; title=&quot;Similar to bragging about LOC, I have noticed in my own field of computational fluid dynamics that some vibe coders brag about how large or rigorous their test suites are. The problem is that whenever I look more closely into the tests, the tests are not outstanding and less rigorous than my own manually created tests. There often are big gaps in vibe coded tests. I don&amp;#39;t care if you have 1 million tests. 1 million easy tests or 1 million tests that don&amp;#39;t cover the right parts of the code…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47745089&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a struggle to get LLMs to generate tests that aren&amp;#39;t entirely stupid. Like grepping source code for a string. or assert(1==1, true) You have to have a curated list of every kind of test not to write or you get hundreds of pointless-at-best tests.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Commentators emphasize that software engineering should be judged by value generation rather than lines of code, noting that excessive, unvetted automation can increase security risks and technical debt &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47744356&quot; title=&quot;As dumb as it is to loudly proclaim you wrote 200k loc last week with an LLM, I don’t think it’s much better to look at the code someone else wrote with an LLM and go “hah! Look at how stupid it is!” You’re making exactly the same error as the other guy, just in the opposite direction: you’re judging the profession of software engineering based on code output rather than value generation. Now, did Garry Tan actually produce anything of value that week? I dunno, you’ll have to ask him.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47744389&quot; title=&quot;Yeah! It&amp;#39;s not like code quality matters in terms of negative value or lives lost, right?! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horizon_IT_scandal Furthermore, &amp;gt; As for the artifact that Tan was building with such frenetic energy, I was broadly ignoring it. Polish software engineer Gregorein, however, took it apart, and the results are at once predictable, hilarious and instructive: A single load of Tan’s &amp;#39;newsletter-blog-thingy&amp;#39; included multiple test harnesses (!), the Hello World Rails app (?!), a…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view this shift as a natural evolution similar to past technological transitions, others warn against the &amp;#34;mischief&amp;#34; caused by the &amp;#34;stupid and diligent&amp;#34;—those who use AI to industriously produce poor-quality work &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47744561&quot; title=&quot;German General Kurt von Hammerstein-Equord (a high-ranking army officer in the Reichswehr/Wehrmacht era): “I divide my officers into four groups. There are clever, diligent, stupid, and lazy officers. Usually two characteristics are combined. Some are clever and diligent — their place is the General Staff. The next lot are stupid and lazy — they make up 90% of every army and are suited to routine duties. Anyone who is both clever and lazy is qualified for the highest leadership posts, because…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47745898&quot; title=&quot;As someone who has switched to exclusively coded using AI after 30 years of coding by myself, I find it really weird when people take credit for the lines of code ad features that AI generates. Flexing that one &amp;#39;coded&amp;#39; tens of hundreds of thousands of lines per day is a bit cringe, seeing as though it&amp;#39;s really just the prompt that one typed.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47744382&quot; title=&quot;This is a person clearly grieving that his hard earned knowledge in his field is now not that valuable. It is * exactly * the same as a person who spent years perfecting hand written HTML, just to face the wrath of React.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/law/2026/apr/11/appeals-court-ruling-home-distilling-ban-unconstitutional&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;US appeals court declares 158-year-old home distilling ban unconstitutional&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theguardian.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47736298&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;230 points · &lt;strong&gt;248 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by Jimmc414&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A US appeals court has declared a 158-year-old federal ban on home distilling unconstitutional, ruling that Congress exceeded its taxing authority by criminalizing the hobby. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/law/2026/apr/11/appeals-court-ruling-home-distilling-ban-unconstitutional&quot; title=&quot;US appeals court declares 158-year-old home distilling ban unconstitutional    Judge said ban, which originated in Reconstruction era to thwart liquor tax evasion, actually reduced tax revenue    [Skip to main content](#maincontent)[Skip to navigation](#navigation)    Close dialogue1/1Next imagePrevious imageToggle caption    [Skip to navigation](#navigation)    [Print…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some commenters argue that home distillation poses significant health risks like methanol poisoning &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737230&quot; title=&quot;As tourists to sketchy places in Asia discovered, methanol poisoning is a real risk, even from large scale distillation. It is the quality control that matters. Illegal stills make quality control impossible, so legalisation and government certified testing can make it safe. However, this ruling is not about alcohol, it is about dissolving Federal authority exercised via the trade and commerce clause of the Constitution.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47736367&quot; title=&quot;In Norway alcohol is very expensive, so many people distill at home illegally. Every travel guide tells you to not accept home-distilled drinks, since they can be poisonous.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47736355&quot; title=&quot;I always thought the reason was that badly distilled drinks were dangerous.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that these dangers are largely myths or oversimplifications, noting that distillation only concentrates existing alcohols and that methanol levels in grain-based mashes are negligible &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47736498&quot; title=&quot;This is actually a myth. I’ll have to see if I can find the papers I read but mass spectrometry has shown that methanol comes out throughout the entire process. The idea that things come out at their boiling temperature is a drastic oversimplification. Methanol is really only present in significant amounts in fruit mashes because it comes from fermentation of pectin. Grain or sugar-derived alcohol barely has any at all. The foreshots you throw out do have things that taste bad and which you…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47736441&quot; title=&quot;That’s actually a common myth perpetuated by the American government during prohibition. The Feds added methanol to bootlegged hooch to blind people, then they told people they’d go blind from moonshine to discourage it. Distillation doesn’t create alcohols, it only concentrates them. The ratio of ethanol to methanol in a distilled spirit will be approximately the same as in the wash it was distilled from. Drinking brandy you’ll get about the same ratio as if you drank the wine it was made…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents of legalization emphasize personal liberty and point to successful legal home distilling in countries like New Zealand &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47736412&quot; title=&quot;Anything that decants below 78.4C is going to have methanol in it, I usually separate out the first 100ml or so that decants after 78.4C to play it safe. I&amp;#39;ve been doing it for about 20 years, no poisoning cases yet. Home distillation has been legal in NZ since 1996.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737834&quot; title=&quot;There are many hobbies with which people can kill themselves if they don&amp;#39;t understand what they are doing. I don&amp;#39;t see how brewing is different. A grown-up person has rights and bears the consequences of negligence and that&amp;#39;s totally normal, that&amp;#39;s what freedom is. As long as the product is not sold outside but for personal consumption, it must be legal to make without any certifications.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. However, the discussion highlights that the court ruling is primarily a challenge to federal authority, specifically targeting the government&amp;#39;s power to use taxes as bans and potentially undermining the broad &amp;#34;interstate commerce&amp;#34; precedents established by *Wickard v. Filburn* &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737230&quot; title=&quot;As tourists to sketchy places in Asia discovered, methanol poisoning is a real risk, even from large scale distillation. It is the quality control that matters. Illegal stills make quality control impossible, so legalisation and government certified testing can make it safe. However, this ruling is not about alcohol, it is about dissolving Federal authority exercised via the trade and commerce clause of the Constitution.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47736953&quot; title=&quot;Edit: According to AI, I&amp;#39;ve got this a bit backwards. The ruling hits the taxing power, not the commerce clause. It&amp;#39;s nonetheless interesting, since the machine gun ban may be affected. The court says that you can&amp;#39;t use a tax to ban something outright, which is what the post-1986 machine gun ban is: refusing to collect a tax on post-1986 machine guns, effectively banning them. That leaves the commerce clause as the remaining defense for all taxes-as-bans or general outright bans. And that…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blinry.org/diy-soft-drinks/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;DIY Soft Drinks&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blinry.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47741701&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;341 points · 93 comments · by _Microft&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Inspired by open-source projects, this guide details how to create DIY soft drink concentrates—including sugar-free cola, orange soda, and almond soda—using essential oils, gum arabic, and various sweeteners. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blinry.org/diy-soft-drinks/&quot; title=&quot;Title: DIY soft drinks    URL Source: https://blinry.org/diy-soft-drinks/    Published Time: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 15:28:21 GMT    Markdown Content:  # DIY soft drinks    *   [![Image 1: Cartoon avatar of blinry](https://blinry.org/assets/images/avatar.png)](https://blinry.org/)  *   [Latest](https://blinry.org/#latest)  *   [Popular](https://blinry.org/#popular)  *   [My Favorites](https://blinry.org/#favs)  *   [Contact](https://blinry.org/about/)    # DIY soft drinks    Cola, orange soda, and almond soda!    …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DIY soft drink enthusiasts emphasize that the most difficult step is often emulsification, suggesting that beginners use pre-hydrated gum Arabic or water-soluble flavor concentrates to avoid cloudy results &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47744268&quot; title=&quot;One pro-tip as I now somehow have a commercial bottling license these days: get pre-hydrated gum Arabic. Much easier to work with. Almost everybody who messes this up will make the mistake at the hydrating the gum Arabic stage. Blend it with any dry ingredients like sugar before using. If you can’t source it, I’m not going to tell you that you SHOULD pretend to be a bottling company and ask a gum provider to send you some free samples, but you could and the amount they send you will last the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users recommend sourcing professional-grade concentrates or natural flavors to simplify the process &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743289&quot; title=&quot;Last time I tried this...it was alot easier to just buy the concentrate from Cube-Cola rather than trying to source all of the essential oils separately and shear them together. https://cube-cola.org/ I think you&amp;#39;d end up paying less, too. I paid about 20 bucks for the concentrate bottle plus shipping, made 1.75L of it, thought it was fine but couldn&amp;#39;t quite replace Coke in my diet, and didn&amp;#39;t buy again. Had I done it all from scratch, I&amp;#39;m pretty sure I would&amp;#39;ve paid more and had a bunch of…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47745137&quot; title=&quot;I went down this rabbit hole last year after buying a carbonator. Rather than mixing a bunch of oils together, I bought my flavors from Bakto Flavors (based in NJ, USA) which is founded by Dr. Daphna Havkin Frenkel who did her research in food sciences and biotechnology, focusing on vanilla. The cola flavor is really good, and I add acetic acid (Vitamin C) + electrolytes to it. If I&amp;#39;m feeling it, I&amp;#39;ll add in vanilla, cherry, or lime flavors to it. Sad to hear she passed away recently this…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others focus on cost-saving hardware hacks, such as using ball lock valves and standard CO2 cylinders to achieve higher carbonation levels than commercial countertop units &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47745498&quot; title=&quot;If you want to carbonate water but don&amp;#39;t want to buy a countertop carbonator or its overpriced CO2 refills, you can get a ball lock valve cap that screws onto 1L or 2L soda bottles for around $8-16. That valve will attach to a standard female fitting, which you can put on the end of a hose coming from a pressure regulator, which will attach to a full-size CO2 cylinder available from a brewing or gas supply shop. CO2 refills are a lot cheaper this way. Put cold water in the bottle with some…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743086&quot; title=&quot;Disappointed there is no carbon dioxide injection. In the 90s till date in this corner of India, Mr Butler is a compact pure mechanical device which can make nose tickling strong sodas. If I were a soda fan, I would have DIYed and rejected the flat mop water that most commercial sodas have become.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. For those replicating specific brands, international product labels can provide exact sweetener ratios, though some hobbyists prefer natural alternatives like kombucha for health and simplicity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47744178&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve also been dabbling in this recently in an attempt to avoid buying SodaStream syrups (which are on the BDS boycott list). Tips for working on sugar-free recipes: In some countries (like Canada), soft-drink manufacturers are required to disclose the exact amount of each artificial sweetener they use in the drink. So you can easily grab those numbers from Canadian product listings for use in your own recipes. E.g. 355ml of Diet Coke contains 131 mg aspartame + 15mg ace-K. Also, aspartame can…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743804&quot; title=&quot;I bottled 20 litres of kombucha yesterday with ginger and lemongrass. It&amp;#39;ll be very fizzy and ready to drink in 3-5 days. Costs next to nothing and quite healthy - water, black tea, sugar, (gifted and self-reproducing) scoby. The flavourings are what costs most, depending on what you use.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blogfontawesome.wpcomstaging.com/we-have-a-99-email-reputation-gmail-disagrees/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;We have a 99% email reputation, but Gmail disagrees&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blogfontawesome.wpcomstaging.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738978&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;212 points · 201 comments · by em-bee&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Font Awesome reports that despite having a 99% reputation score with SendGrid, Gmail is filtering their emails into spam folders because the platform&amp;#39;s delivery algorithms penalize companies that send infrequent, low-noise messages to respect customer inboxes. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blogfontawesome.wpcomstaging.com/we-have-a-99-email-reputation-gmail-disagrees/&quot; title=&quot;Title: We have a 99% email reputation. Gmail disagrees.    URL Source: https://blogfontawesome.wpcomstaging.com/we-have-a-99-email-reputation-gmail-disagrees/    Published Time: 2026-03-04T20:14:51+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Home  # We have a 99% email reputation. Gmail disagrees. - Blog Awesome    # [Font Awesome](https://blogfontawesome.wpcomstaging.com/)    View Site Menu  Close Site Menu    * * *    ![Image 1: A mailbox icon with a prohibited symbol overlay on a green…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that Font Awesome’s delivery issues stem from a &amp;#34;dissonance&amp;#34; between business goals and user consent, noting that the company often requires email registration for free tools and employs &amp;#34;dark patterns&amp;#34; like rotating sender names for marketing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47739641&quot; title=&quot;How do you get email addresses? Do people freely and explicitly choose to sign up to your mailing list, or is it baggage that you&amp;#39;re forcing on them without their consent? I notice that when I go to https://fontawesome.com/ and click &amp;#39;Start for Free&amp;#39;, I&amp;#39;m asked for my email address. This isn&amp;#39;t necessary for me to use the icons. I just need a page that tells me to add the necessary tags for cdnjs [0]. I think your problem is dissonance between what you think your users want and what they…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47739762&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m a Font Awesome subscriber and yes, for the record, they spam me with annoying marketing and probably deserve their Gmail woes. They also use that silly dark pattern where they alternate sending out marketing emails from {David,Harry,Sam,Janet,every other person at the company}@fontawesome.com.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some defend these aggressive tactics as a &amp;#34;Darwinian&amp;#34; necessity for small businesses to survive against platform monopolies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47740539&quot; title=&quot;Are you an entrepreneur or an employee? Do you know how exceedingly hard it is to grow a business and how shameless you have to be in the face of adversity to make it work? It sucks. You have to do this stuff to get a customer relationship. The thing Apple and Google get for free and try so hard to snip you out of. Maybe it wouldn&amp;#39;t be so bad if we regulated market monopolies and caused them to break up. More money to go around. Font Awesome is a good business, but you know the gettings are…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47741233&quot; title=&quot;Sending you an email after you signed up is &amp;#39;unethical&amp;#39;? That&amp;#39;s a bit carried away, don&amp;#39;t you think? There are unsubscribe buttons with laws that enforce that they work. Meanwhile hyperscalers are constantly in your eyes and ears and they have a million ways to bypass those regulations and get into your headspace regardless. Your URL bar is an ad. Your phone default settings and push notifications are ads. Your app store is an ad. Every new feature or OS update is an ad. Your new tab screen is…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others maintain that unsolicited emails are unethical and justify immediate spam reporting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47740237&quot; title=&quot;I don’t know if this is true with Font Awesome, but more and more companies are spamming my inbox despite disabling any promotional emails in their settings. So, I mark any unwanted email as spam in Gmail immediately, and even leave bad reviews. Having my email address is not the same as having my consent. Stop trying to roofie us with malicious EULAs.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47740617&quot; title=&quot;Who’s angry? We’re just not interested in someone else’s unethical and unwelcome business practices and are acting to curtail its impact. Your dreams of business success aren’t my problem, and neither is your shamelessness.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. To mitigate these issues, users suggest implementing frictionless unsubscribe links or adopting &amp;#34;handshake&amp;#34; protocols where recipients must approve senders before receiving messages &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47739862&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s pretty amazing email hasn&amp;#39;t been replaced, or at least joined, by an open protocol where you can&amp;#39;t message someone without first being approved by them, either directly like Facebook messenger or through some sort of referral system.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47740203&quot; title=&quot;Do they have an easy-to-unsubscribe link in the marketing spam (cannot include logging into the user&amp;#39;s account)? I have a generic name gmail account and people with my name frequently accidentally use my email address when signing up for stuff. When I get unsolicited mail which doesn&amp;#39;t include a simple unsubscribe link then I just report as spam instead.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47740234&quot; title=&quot;The problem is how to start a conversation. We had a similar problem in the university. At the beginning of the semester, the students have to register for a Moodle server with additional material. So when they create an account, we have to send a few thousands of confirmation emails in a short period out of the blue, that makes Gmail/Yahoo/Outlook/Whatever unhappy. The solution was to ask the students to send an email to the server half an hour before registering. It&amp;#39;s not ideal, but it adds…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://brennan.day/the-end-of-eleventy/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The End of Eleventy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (brennan.day)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47735535&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;210 points · 175 comments · by ValentineC&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Font Awesome team has rebranded the open-source static site generator Eleventy as &amp;#34;Build Awesome,&amp;#34; launching a successful Kickstarter to fund a new commercialized, all-in-one site builder. The move has sparked criticism from developers who fear the rebrand commodifies the project and threatens its independent, community-driven origins. &lt;a href=&quot;https://brennan.day/the-end-of-eleventy/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The End of Eleventy    URL Source: https://brennan.day/the-end-of-eleventy/    Published Time: 2026-03-04T00:00:00.000-07:00    Markdown Content:  # The End of Eleventy · brennan.day  [Skip to main content](https://brennan.day/the-end-of-eleventy/#main-content)[](https://brennan.day/the-end-of-eleventy/)    # [brennan.day](https://brennan.day/)    *   [Now](https://brennan.day/now/)  *   [About](https://brennan.day/about/)  *   [Pages](https://brennan.day/slash-pages/)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the &amp;#34;ultimate entitlement&amp;#34; of developers who refuse to pay for tooling while expecting to be paid for their own work, often criticizing maintainers who seek sustainable business models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47736601&quot; title=&quot;Many folks on HN are the exact sorts of people who have lived the thankless popular-enough-to-be-an-unpaid-job solo OSS maintainer dream, so I wonder if you feel as annoyed by the tone of this post as I do. I truly don&amp;#39;t understand how the same folks that champion accessibility and humane ideals while humble bragging about working for $5/hour to help get local businesses online can throw so much shade on people who are urgently trying to figure out a way to get paid, often just to keep the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47736911&quot; title=&quot;The ultimate entitlement is refusing to pay for tooling, while expecting to be getting a paid job as well. I am hard line on not feeling sorry for projects going away, being taken over by organisations, when it mattered people should have actually sponsored them, instead of bosting how great is to get it all for free/gratis. Every, single time, someone posts a cool paid project, there is the usual comment why pay, look at MIT/BSD/Apache/... project so and so.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that the shift from one-time purchases to perpetual subscriptions makes paid tools financially inaccessible, others maintain that subscriptions are necessary to combat piracy and fund ongoing maintenance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47736973&quot; title=&quot;That is true, but nowadays most paid projects end up being perpetual subscriptions. Which I kind of get, as on-going maintenance still costs, but it used to be that you paid for a tool once and only paid again if you wanted/needed an updated version. I&amp;#39;d gladly pay $15-$60 for a tool once (and again if I needed an update) but $10-$15 per month for 20 different things (that I will only use occasionally) is just out of reach for me financially and I live in a &amp;#39;rich&amp;#39; first-world country.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737100&quot; title=&quot;How do you imagine it used to be when everything was commercial? On the plus side, at least there wasn&amp;#39;t that many magpie development, and rewrites just because. Subscriptions are the only way to fix piracy.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Regarding technology choices, commenters debate the longevity of Static Site Generators (SSGs) versus WordPress, noting that while SSGs offer security and performance, WordPress remains dominant due to its superior user interface, plugin ecosystem, and accessibility for non-technical users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47735733&quot; title=&quot;SSGs versus Wordpress is surprisingly still a battle… I’m genuinely shocked at the number of sites on the Net that use Wordpress, dynamically assembling markup with PHP for every page view, risking constant hacking and stuff, when they have a total of like 7 or 100 pages, which could all be pre-rendered to HTML files in roughly 8 seconds on even a junky laptop or X-small ec2 instance. It really is okay. For those who post regular updates on those sites, there are great and cheap WP plugins that…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47736356&quot; title=&quot;I started my client&amp;#39;s site on Hugo, withing 2 days I was editing something for them every 30 mins (slight exaggeration). They wanted something they could edit, they don&amp;#39;t do Markdown, they don&amp;#39;t manually write URLs they want to drag images into their posts and pages. So bye bye Hugo.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47735904&quot; title=&quot;Wordpress has: * the ability to schedule posts * a ton of plugins * a lot of people who know how to use it * a reasonable WYSIWYG interface As far as I know, most SSGs fall down on one or more of those dimensions.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users suggest that even if a tool like Eleventy is &amp;#34;abandoned,&amp;#34; it can remain functional for years without updates, or be replaced by simple local LLM workflows &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47735879&quot; title=&quot;My personal page runs on 11ty since the last 3 years and I enjoyed it a lot. I’ll probably replace it with pure HTML soon - I found that I don’t need a SSG anymore, I can just use a local LLM to generate HTML out of markdown files and I never use any fancy features anyway.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47735873&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been using the same version of Jekyll, using the same outdated, discontinued version of ruby, for more than 10y. I refuse to learn anything about ruby, or spend any time upgrading Jekyll or any of the 2 plug-ins I use, and I take a weird pride in that. It works, it generates my blog, I don&amp;#39;t want it to do anything else. I have no idea how it works anymore. For all I know Jekyll has been abandoned. That version of ruby might be riddled with bugs and security holes, and why would I care?…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://apnews.com/article/hungary-election-orban-magyar-trump-1a4eb0ba6b94e0c80c3cd18bd36254ab&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Viktor Orbán concedes defeat after &amp;#39;painful&amp;#39; election result&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (apnews.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743553&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;216 points · 67 comments · by hackernj&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has been ousted after 16 years in power, following an election victory by a pro-European challenger that rejected his authoritarian policies. &lt;a href=&quot;https://apnews.com/article/hungary-election-orban-magyar-trump-1a4eb0ba6b94e0c80c3cd18bd36254ab&quot; title=&quot;Hungarian Prime Minister Orbán is ejected after 16 years in a European electoral earthquake    Hungarian voters have ousted long-serving Prime Minister Viktor Orbán after 16 years in power, rejecting the authoritarian policies and global far-right movement that he embodied in favor of a pro-European challenger in a bombshell election result with global repercussions.    [![AP Logo](https://assets.apnews.com/19/66/bc546486408c8595f01753a9fbeb/ap-logo-176-by-208.svg)](/)    Menu    *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary consensus among commenters is a sense of relief and surprise that Orbán conceded defeat, with some noting this bodes well for the stability of the European Union and its response to the war in Ukraine &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743651&quot; title=&quot;Sad commentary on the modern world where my first thought was, well good for Orban to concede defeat.  Not all current world heads of state have that much maturity. This bodes well for the midterm state of the European union.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743668&quot; title=&quot;As a fellow European this is the biggest surprise of the election, I thought for sure he&amp;#39;d pull a Trump.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743640&quot; title=&quot;Welcome back to Europe, Hungary.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743896&quot; title=&quot;My guess is it&amp;#39;s flagged by Americans (it&amp;#39;s their daytime) who don&amp;#39;t realize the significance of this result to the EU and potentially the EU&amp;#39;s response to the war in Ukraine.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some users remain skeptical of the transition, pointing out that the successor was previously a member of Orbán’s party &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743665&quot; title=&quot;Time will tell. Keep in mind that his successor was part of Orban&amp;#39;s party in the past.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. A notable disagreement emerged regarding the maturity of conceding power, with one user comparing the peaceful transfer of power to the 2020 US election, while others dismissed such comparisons as &amp;#34;sour grapes&amp;#34; or fundamentally flawed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743651&quot; title=&quot;Sad commentary on the modern world where my first thought was, well good for Orban to concede defeat.  Not all current world heads of state have that much maturity. This bodes well for the midterm state of the European union.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743854&quot; title=&quot;Flagged due to sour grapes.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743751&quot; title=&quot;From the perspective of a Canadian, this feels like an absolutely mad-cap crazy comment. What did you live through? EDIT: with as little judgement as I&amp;#39;m sincerely trying to have, I would strongly recommend reviewing your information diet and neurotypical predispositions to investigate why you might believe this. (E.g. I am predisposed to support an underdog, and need to gutcheck myself on that regularly)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743867&quot; title=&quot;What I lived through, was Biden taking office.  My information diet does not consist of American news, or any election coverage.  All I am saying is that in the end, power transferred, without the use of force, he willingly gave up power.  And I also acknowledged that he always disputed the results, which from a certain perspective makes his ultimate concession, more indicative of his respecting the system.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743918&quot; title=&quot;Sure. Just like Hitler offing himself; just an expression of trust in the system! &amp;#39;Oh no, I lost in the marketplace of ideas, time to make the ultimate concession!&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://chriswhocodes.com/vm-options-explorer.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;JVM Options Explorer&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (chriswhocodes.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738094&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;185 points · 80 comments · by 0x54MUR41&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The VM Options Explorer is an interactive database by Chriswhocodes that allows users to search, filter, and compare over 2,000 HotSpot JVM options across various OpenJDK versions and distributions, including Oracle, Amazon Corretto, and GraalVM. &lt;a href=&quot;https://chriswhocodes.com/vm-options-explorer.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: VM Options Explorer - OpenJDK11 HotSpot    URL Source: https://chriswhocodes.com/vm-options-explorer.html    Published Time: Mon, 06 Apr 2026 21:44:48 GMT    Markdown Content:  # VM Options Explorer - OpenJDK11…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The vast number of JVM options—over 1,800—is viewed by some as a sign of Java&amp;#39;s success in supporting diverse OS environments and business requirements &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738664&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a result of Java being required to run on many different OS environments (Oracle, Redhat, Windows, RISC/ARM/x86), along with user constraints and also business requirements. In a way you can use this list of JVM options to illustrate how successful Java has become, that everyone needs an option to get it to work how they like it. As a Java dev, I have maybe used about 10-15 of them in my career. The weirdest/funnest one I used was for an old Sun Microsystems Solaris server which ran…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, while others see it as a burden compared to modern, opinionated tooling like Go &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738395&quot; title=&quot;1843 options is too many. You could never even consider all of the possible combinations and interactions, let alone test them. I have really come to appreciate modern opinionated tooling like gofmt, that does not come with hundreds to thousands of knobs.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738749&quot; title=&quot;gofmt isn’t really comparable to the JVM, but it is a really strong expression of the opinionated tooling GoLang has. While gofmt is “just” a formatting tool. The interesting part is that go code that doesn’t follow the go formatting standard is rejected by the go compiler. So not only does gofmt not have knobs, you can’t even fork it to add knobs, because the rest of the go ecosystem will outright reject code formatted in any other way. It’s a rather extreme approach to opinionated tooling.…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that no amount of tuning can bridge the performance gap between the JVM and languages like Rust or Go &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47739083&quot; title=&quot;All of that configuration and it will always be less efficient than Rust, or even Golang. This is why lots of engineers waste time fiddling with options to tune the JVM and still require hundreds of replicated micro-services to &amp;#39;scale&amp;#39; their backends and losing money on AWS and when they will never admit the issue is the technology they have chosen (Java) and why AWS loves their customers using inefficient and expensive technologies. Even after that, both Go and Rust continue to run rings…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, whereas proponents note that the actual number of unique options is smaller due to architectural duplicates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738663&quot; title=&quot;In what way is gofmt remotely comparable to a JVM? In reality the number of options is significantly smaller than the 1843 you mentioned. The list contains boatloads of duplicates because they exist for multiple architectures. E.g. BackgroundCompilation is present on 8 lines on the OpenJDK 25 page: aarch64, arm, ppc, riscv, s390, x86 and twice more without an architecture.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. In practice, most developers only interact with a handful of settings, primarily focusing on heap size, garbage collection algorithms, and thread pool management for multi-tenant systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738664&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a result of Java being required to run on many different OS environments (Oracle, Redhat, Windows, RISC/ARM/x86), along with user constraints and also business requirements. In a way you can use this list of JVM options to illustrate how successful Java has become, that everyone needs an option to get it to work how they like it. As a Java dev, I have maybe used about 10-15 of them in my career. The weirdest/funnest one I used was for an old Sun Microsystems Solaris server which ran…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738784&quot; title=&quot;Heap size, GC algorithm. I suggest most people never touch almost any other options.  (Flight recording and heap dumps being the exception).&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47739055&quot; title=&quot;GC threads are generally often useful on multi-tenant systems or machines with many cores, as Java will default-size its thread pools according to the number of logical cores.  If the server has 16 or more cores, that&amp;#39;s very rarely something you want, especially if you run multiple JVMs on the same host. Not JVM options, but these are often also good to tune: -Djdk.virtualThreadScheduler.parallelism      -Djdk.virtualThreadScheduler.maxPoolSize     …&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://phyphox.org/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Phyphox – Physical Experiments Using a Smartphone&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (phyphox.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737376&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;204 points · 33 comments · by _Microft&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Phyphox is a free app developed by RWTH Aachen University that transforms smartphones into mobile laboratories by utilizing internal sensors for physics experiments, data export, and remote control. &lt;a href=&quot;https://phyphox.org/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Your smartphone is a mobile lab.    URL Source: https://phyphox.org/    Published Time: Sat, 11 Apr 2026 09:54:42 GMT    Markdown Content:  # phyphox – Physical Phone Experiments    [Skip to content](https://phyphox.org/#content)    [![Image 1: phyphox](https://phyphox.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/cropped-phyphox_darker_r2-scaled-1.png)](https://phyphox.org/)  [phyphox](https://phyphox.org/)    Physical Phone Experiments    Menu    *   [News](https://phyphox.org/news/)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Phyphox is a popular tool in physics education, even offering a citable paper for professional use &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738385&quot; title=&quot;There is a paper you can cite if you use phyphox professionally.[1] In Germany phyphox is quite popular in physics education. However on android the sampling rate of the acceleration sensor is limited to 50/s. At least if you install through the official app store. [1] https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6552/aac05e&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Users have shared creative applications, such as locating wall wiring by detecting 50 Hz grid frequencies via the magnetometer, though this specific trick may face aliasing issues on 60 Hz grids due to sensor sampling limits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47739032&quot; title=&quot;The coolest thing I ever did with that was finding wires in a friends wall - we needed to drill a hole and it was unclear whether the wires went up (problem) or right from the outlet. I didn&amp;#39;t have a cable finder on hand but did have the epiphany to put a large load on the outlet (we used a kettle, a hairdryer would also work, just needs a lot of watts) and use the Fourier transform magnet spectrum to find the 50 Hz grid frequency in the wall. Worked beautifully. Sadly, since most smartphone…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47739316&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; this will not be applicable to Americans and everyone else with a 60 Hz grid frequency, the 50 Hz were already at the Nyquist–Shannon limit. The trick should work fine, but you may confuse the 60Hz signal with a 40Hz signal [1] [2]. This should work for higher frequencies too, but if the frequency is toooo high the problem is that the magnetometers averages a short period of time (or use a window) instead of being an actual an instant measurement. [1] Calculated using my fingers moving in the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a technical debate regarding Android sampling rates; while some users report a 50 Hz cap on newer devices, others point to database evidence of rates up to 500 Hz, suggesting discrepancies may stem from specific hardware models or new Android permission requirements &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738385&quot; title=&quot;There is a paper you can cite if you use phyphox professionally.[1] In Germany phyphox is quite popular in physics education. However on android the sampling rate of the acceleration sensor is limited to 50/s. At least if you install through the official app store. [1] https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6552/aac05e&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47740567&quot; title=&quot;Huh? I get 500 Hz here on a Samsung from 2019 and make use of it regularly. Sensor frequency is one of the things I check before buying a new phone, surely newer Android versions haven&amp;#39;t killed that with new api restrictions?! Edit: no, it can&amp;#39;t have. Then the phone sensor database would show that since it is built from submissions within Phyphox: https://phyphox.org/sensordb/ I&amp;#39;m not sure what problem you&amp;#39;re running into (perhaps a very unusual phone that has only a 50 Hz accelerometer) but…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47746967&quot; title=&quot;The A16 gets 250~500 Hz according to Phyphox&amp;#39; database (depending on which A16 model you&amp;#39;ve got) But I see Google indeed introduced another permission for this: https://developer.android.google.cn/develop/sensors-and-loca... Curious that the database shows good rates but you&amp;#39;re not seeing it in your instance. The device is from 2024 so it&amp;#39;ll have shipped with this new restriction; the database submissions can&amp;#39;t be from an older android version. Phyphox must declare that permission or else it…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-04-11</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-04-11</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/artemis-ii-splashdown-return/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Artemis II safely splashes down&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cbsnews.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47725583&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1271 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 440 comments · by areoform&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NASA&amp;#39;s Artemis II crew safely returned to Earth on Friday, splashing down in the Pacific Ocean near San Diego after a historic nine-day mission that set a record for the farthest distance humans have ever traveled from the planet. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/artemis-ii-splashdown-return/&quot; title=&quot;Artemis II crew splashes down near San Diego after historic moon mission    NASA&amp;#39;s Artemis II astronauts returned to Earth with a splashdown landing in the Pacific Ocean after making a high-speed reentry through the atmosphere.    * Latest    + [U.S.](/us/)    + [Iran War](https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/iran-war-trump-strait-of-hormuz-israel-ceasefire-talks/)    + [Artemis II](https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/artemis-ii-splashdown-return/)    + [World](/world/)    + [Politics](/politics/)    +…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The successful splashdown of Artemis II has sparked debate over NASA&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;acceptable&amp;#34; crew mortality rate of 1 in 30, which some view as an alarming regression in safety standards &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47725663&quot; title=&quot;Glad that they&amp;#39;re safe and sound. It&amp;#39;s worth pointing out that this is the first extremely public, widely acknowledged high risk mission NASA has done in over 50 years. The Shuttle was risky, but it wasn&amp;#39;t thought of or acknowledged by NASA as being risky until very late in its lifecycle. According to NASA&amp;#39;s OIG, Artemis acceptable crew mortality rate is 1 in 30. Roughly 3x riskier than the shuttle. There genuinely is a world where they don&amp;#39;t make it back home. I am grateful that they did. And…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47725961&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Artemis acceptable crew mortality rate is 1 in 30. This seems insane to me. That X decades later we accept, with all our advancements in tech, a weaker system than ever before. That if we send 30 people we _accept_ that one is possible to die. That&amp;#39;s the starting point? That&amp;#39;s what we document as acceptable?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others argue that these figures represent a more honest acknowledgment of the extreme physical risks inherent in lunar travel compared to the Shuttle&amp;#39;s historically understated dangers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47725663&quot; title=&quot;Glad that they&amp;#39;re safe and sound. It&amp;#39;s worth pointing out that this is the first extremely public, widely acknowledged high risk mission NASA has done in over 50 years. The Shuttle was risky, but it wasn&amp;#39;t thought of or acknowledged by NASA as being risky until very late in its lifecycle. According to NASA&amp;#39;s OIG, Artemis acceptable crew mortality rate is 1 in 30. Roughly 3x riskier than the shuttle. There genuinely is a world where they don&amp;#39;t make it back home. I am grateful that they did. And…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47726133&quot; title=&quot;Yes, and the memories of Apollo are made rosy by hagiography. I even wrote an entire thing to explain why, https://1517.substack.com/p/1-in-30-artemis-greatness-and-ri... (yeah, shameless plug, sorry - it&amp;#39;s more for the citations than not. You can read the standards and reports I&amp;#39;ve linked to) But if I&amp;#39;m allowed to repeat myself from elsewhere in the thread and the meat of the above thing, It&amp;#39;s physically not possible at our current level of technology to make this &amp;#39;safer&amp;#39; due to the distances…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47725734&quot; title=&quot;I’d bet a million dollars that Orion will win every safety metric compared to the shuttle once it is retired. NASA deluded itself in thinking the Shuttle was safe. The reality is that the Shuttle was the most dangerous spaceship anyone ever built.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While the mission&amp;#39;s success provided a sense of national pride and scientific continuity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47726166&quot; title=&quot;As an American I feel like I&amp;#39;ve been going through a bit of an identity crisis from what I remember growing up. Probably the rose tinted glasses of being a child but being from Florida I always had a sense of amazement and wonder as I heard the sonic boom of the shuttle returning to earth. Really felt like I was coexisting in this incredible scientific powerhouse of a country full of bright and enabled peoples that knew how to prioritize curiosity and innovation. Feeling like a bit of a &amp;#39;vibe&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, technical concerns persisted throughout the flight, ranging from heat shield integrity to surprisingly basic communication issues &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47725599&quot; title=&quot;Held my breath the whole time after all the heat shield warnings. Very glad it all worked, or that there was enough margin!&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47725721&quot; title=&quot;Wild that they manage to fly to the moon but still seem to be having those comms problems. Asking the astronauts if they’re really pressing the PTT button is wild.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://aisle.com/blog/ai-cybersecurity-after-mythos-the-jagged-frontier&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Small models also found the vulnerabilities that Mythos found&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (aisle.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732020&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1239 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 328 comments · by dominicq&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Research by AISLE reveals that small, cheap, open-weights AI models can detect the same high-profile vulnerabilities recently showcased by Anthropic’s &amp;#34;Mythos&amp;#34; model. The findings suggest that cybersecurity capability is &amp;#34;jagged&amp;#34; and depends more on the surrounding expert system and orchestration than on the scale of the underlying model. &lt;a href=&quot;https://aisle.com/blog/ai-cybersecurity-after-mythos-the-jagged-frontier&quot; title=&quot;Title: AI Cybersecurity After Mythos: The Jagged Frontier    URL Source: https://aisle.com/blog/ai-cybersecurity-after-mythos-the-jagged-frontier    Markdown Content:  ## Why the moat is the system, not the model    * * *    **TL;DR:** We tested Anthropic Mythos&amp;#39;s showcase vulnerabilities on small, cheap, open-weights models. They recovered much of the same analysis. AI cybersecurity capability is very _jagged_: it doesn&amp;#39;t scale smoothly with model size, and the moat is the system into which deep…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While small models can identify the same vulnerabilities as Anthropic&amp;#39;s Mythos when presented with isolated, relevant code snippets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732254&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; We took the specific vulnerabilities Anthropic showcases in their announcement, isolated the relevant code, and ran them through small, cheap, open-weights models. Those models recovered much of the same analysis. Eight out of eight models detected Mythos&amp;#39;s flagship FreeBSD exploit, including one with only 3.6 billion active parameters costing $0.11 per million tokens. Impressive, and very valuable work, but isolating the relevant code changes the situation so much that I&amp;#39;m not sure it&amp;#39;s much…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732322&quot; title=&quot;This is from the first of the caveats that they list: &amp;gt; Scoped context: Our tests gave models the vulnerable function directly, often with contextual hints (e.g., &amp;#39;consider wraparound behavior&amp;#39;). A real autonomous discovery pipeline starts from a full codebase with no hints. The models&amp;#39; performance here is an upper bound on what they&amp;#39;d achieve in a fully autonomous scan. That said, a well-designed scaffold naturally produces this kind of scoped context through its targeting and iterative…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, critics argue this &amp;#34;suggestive&amp;#34; framing bypasses the primary challenge of security research: locating bugs within massive, complex codebases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732337&quot; title=&quot;The Anthropic writeup addresses this explicitly: &amp;gt; This was the most critical vulnerability we discovered in OpenBSD with Mythos Preview after a thousand runs through our scaffold. Across a thousand runs through our scaffold, the total cost was under $20,000 and found several dozen more findings. While the specific run that found the bug above cost under $50, that number only makes sense with full hindsight. Like any search process, we can&amp;#39;t know in advance which run will succeed. Mythos…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732350&quot; title=&quot;If you cut out the vulnerable code from Heartbleed and just put it in front of a C programmer, they will immediately flag it. It&amp;#39;s obvious. But it took Neel Mehta to   discover it. What&amp;#39;s difficult about finding vulnerabilities isn&amp;#39;t properly identifying whether code is mishandling buffers or holding references after freeing something; it&amp;#39;s spotting that in the context of a large, complex program, and working out how attacker-controlled data hits that code. It&amp;#39;s weird that Aisle wrote this.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. The debate centers on whether the &amp;#34;moat&amp;#34; lies in the model&amp;#39;s intelligence or the scaffolding system that automates the search process &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732838&quot; title=&quot;Wasn&amp;#39;t the scaffolding for the Mythos run basically a line of bash that loops through every file of the codebase and prompts the model to find vulnerabilities in it? That sounds pretty close to &amp;#39;any gold there?&amp;#39; to me, only automated. Have Anthropic actually said anything about the amount of false positives Mythos turned up? FWIW, I saw some talk on Xitter (so grain of salt) about people replicating their result with other (public) SotA models, but each turned up only a subset of the ones…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732322&quot; title=&quot;This is from the first of the caveats that they list: &amp;gt; Scoped context: Our tests gave models the vulnerable function directly, often with contextual hints (e.g., &amp;#39;consider wraparound behavior&amp;#39;). A real autonomous discovery pipeline starts from a full codebase with no hints. The models&amp;#39; performance here is an upper bound on what they&amp;#39;d achieve in a fully autonomous scan. That said, a well-designed scaffold naturally produces this kind of scoped context through its targeting and iterative…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, with some suggesting that smaller models might produce too many false positives to be useful at scale &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732337&quot; title=&quot;The Anthropic writeup addresses this explicitly: &amp;gt; This was the most critical vulnerability we discovered in OpenBSD with Mythos Preview after a thousand runs through our scaffold. Across a thousand runs through our scaffold, the total cost was under $20,000 and found several dozen more findings. While the specific run that found the bug above cost under $50, that number only makes sense with full hindsight. Like any search process, we can&amp;#39;t know in advance which run will succeed. Mythos…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732894&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Wasn&amp;#39;t the scaffolding for the Mythos run basically a line of bash that loops through every file of the codebase and prompts the model to find vulnerabilities in it? That sounds pretty close to &amp;#39;any gold there?&amp;#39; to me, only automated. But the entire value is that it can be automated. If you try to automate a small model to look for vulnerabilities over 10,000 files, it&amp;#39;s going to say there are 9,500 vulns. Or none. Both are worthless without human intervention. I definitely breathed a sigh of…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47733662&quot; title=&quot;Admittedly just vibes from me, having pointed small models at code and asked them questions, no extensive evaluation process or anything. For instance, I recall models thinking that every single use of `eval` in javascript is a security vulnerability, even something obviously benign like `eval(&amp;#39;1 + 1&amp;#39;)`. But then I&amp;#39;m only posting comments on HN, I&amp;#39;m not the one writing an authoritative thinkpiece saying Mythos actually isn&amp;#39;t a big deal :-)&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, while a $20,000 automated scan is significantly cheaper than a human researcher &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732894&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Wasn&amp;#39;t the scaffolding for the Mythos run basically a line of bash that loops through every file of the codebase and prompts the model to find vulnerabilities in it? That sounds pretty close to &amp;#39;any gold there?&amp;#39; to me, only automated. But the entire value is that it can be automated. If you try to automate a small model to look for vulnerabilities over 10,000 files, it&amp;#39;s going to say there are 9,500 vulns. Or none. Both are worthless without human intervention. I definitely breathed a sigh of…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, some observers remain skeptical of &amp;#34;earth-shattering&amp;#34; productivity claims given the lack of visible improvements in software quality at major tech companies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47735084&quot; title=&quot;My proof-in-pudding test is still the fact that we haven&amp;#39;t seen gigantic mass firings at tech companies, nor a massive acceleration on quality or breadth (not quantity!) of development. Microsoft has been going heavy on AI for 1y+ now. But then they replace their cruddy native Windows Copilot application with an Electron one. If tests and dev only has marginal cost now, why aren&amp;#39;t they going all in on writing extremely performant, almost completely bug-free native applications everywhere? And…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.xda-developers.com/frances-government-ditching-windows-for-linux/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;France&amp;#39;s government is ditching Windows for Linux, says US tech a strategic risk&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (xda-developers.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47728653&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;491 points · 286 comments · by pabs3&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The French government is transitioning its ministries from Windows to Linux and other open-source solutions to reduce strategic dependence on non-European technology and strengthen digital sovereignty, with departments required to submit transition plans by fall 2026. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.xda-developers.com/frances-government-ditching-windows-for-linux/&quot; title=&quot;France&amp;#39;s government is ditching Windows for Linux, calling US tech dependence a strategic risk    The ministries have until the fall to find a solution.    Menu    [![XDA logo](https://static0.xdaimages.com/assets/images/xda-logo-full-colored-light.svg?v=3.6 &amp;#39;XDA&amp;#39;)](/)    Sign in now    [ ]    Close    * + [News](/news/)    + [Tech Deals](https://www.xda-developers.com/deals/)    + [PC Hardware](/category/pc-hardware/)      [ ]      Submenu      - [CPU](/processor/)      - [GPU](/gpu/)      - [Storage](/storage/)   …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users express pride in France&amp;#39;s move toward digital sovereignty and successful transitions to open-source tools like Matrix &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47729892&quot; title=&quot;Really proud as a French, I think the government has had some success with moving to something matrix based for the public sector too. https://tchap.numerique.gouv.fr I just hope we end up having more wins at the EU-level, instead of massive fails like GAIA-X...&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue the announcement is largely &amp;#34;performative&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;just words&amp;#34; given the vague timeline and previous secret contracts with Microsoft &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730796&quot; title=&quot;The chain of facts makes me sad: 1. The French government announces its digital agency is to write a plan, by the end of the year, so that France could reduce its extra-European dependencies. The communiqué is wrapped up with minor facts (e.g. the digital agency is to switch to Linux on dozens of computers) and big promises from Ministers. 2. Various news sites state that &amp;#39;France is ditching Windows&amp;#39;, at least in their titles. 3. On new aggregators, most people react to the titles. Some do read…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731739&quot; title=&quot;Performative anti-Americanism has become one of the major features of European culture (and especially French culture).&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. A debate exists regarding whether Linux truly qualifies as non-US tech, noting that while creator Linus Torvalds is Finnish, he is also a naturalized American citizen &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47729387&quot; title=&quot;But Linux is US tech? Isn&amp;#39;t the main guy American?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47729768&quot; title=&quot;The “main guy” is Finnish. He also got American citizenship recently, but given the US has increased attacks on naturalised citizens [0] and has a history of this [1] it’s not a solid foundation. [0] https://www.npr.org/2026/01/16/nx-s1-5677685/as-focus-shifts... [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internment_of_Japanese_America...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics suggest the plan faces significant hurdles, including the need for local GPU and AI infrastructure to remain competitive in the future &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47729320&quot; title=&quot;It is a step into the right direction. Over time, more and more work is going to be done by AI though. At some point, it will be unthinkably slow and expensive to let humans work on anything. To do *that* locally, you need GPUs and LLMs. How will Europe solve these two?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47727960&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Pardonned.com – A searchable database of US Pardons&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47727960&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;483 points · 262 comments · by vidluther&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pardonned.com is a new open-source, searchable database built with Astro and SQLite that allows users to easily verify and browse U.S. Department of Justice pardon records. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47727960&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;pardonned.com&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;pardonned.com&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Inspired by the videos of Liz Oyer, I wanted to be able to verify her claims and just look up all the pardons more easily.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Tech Stack:    Playwright - to sccrape the DOJ website   SQLite - local database   Astro 6 - Build out a static website from the sqlite db&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;All code is open source and available on Github.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the potential for pardon power to grant blanket immunity, with many users arguing that &amp;#34;preemptive&amp;#34; pardons for uncharged or future crimes should be abolished to prevent political abuse &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730634&quot; title=&quot;We should at least ban the &amp;#39;preemptive&amp;#39; pardon if not all pardons.  Pardon means forgiveness for a specific convicted crime, not a means to grant blanket immunity.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732370&quot; title=&quot;There are two types here: (1) Pardons for crimes not yet committed. (2) Pardons for crimes committed, but not yet convicted. The first type will allow the pardoned to commit a crime in the future for free, which obviously should not be allowed. The second should be allowed if we have this pardon system at all. The second type became a political necessity, for example to protect Liz Cheney from a vengeful administration.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see pardons as a necessary shield against &amp;#34;vengeful administrations&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732370&quot; title=&quot;There are two types here: (1) Pardons for crimes not yet committed. (2) Pardons for crimes committed, but not yet convicted. The first type will allow the pardoned to commit a crime in the future for free, which obviously should not be allowed. The second should be allowed if we have this pardon system at all. The second type became a political necessity, for example to protect Liz Cheney from a vengeful administration.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732719&quot; title=&quot;Like most political arguments, if you listen carefully; those who advocate for or against pardons, only want them to go one way. A pardon is only a protection against a &amp;#39;vengeful administration&amp;#39; if that administration is not your party. Pardons are only a miscarriage of justice if those pardoned don&amp;#39;t share your ideology.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that the need for such protection highlights a fundamental breakdown in the separation of powers and the judicial system&amp;#39;s impartiality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732827&quot; title=&quot;The notion itself that someone needs to be protected by a &amp;#39;vengeful administration&amp;#39;, while judicial system should be not politically affiliated is telling how broken the whole separation of powers is. Everyone who is a ruling party puts candidates they know aligned with their views, resulting in &amp;#39;just wait until my turn comes and I will do as much as damage as possible&amp;#39; cycle.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47733807&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; puts candidates they know aligned with their views, resulting in &amp;#39;just wait until my turn comes and I will do as much as damage as possible&amp;#39; cycle. There is exactly one party in the US that does this, and it&amp;#39;s because they have dedicated themselves to blocking the other party from accomplishing much of anything when they get power.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters also compared the historical scope of pardons, noting that while recent grants cover long timeframes, precedents like the Nixon pardon were even more significant in their lack of restrictions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47729648&quot; title=&quot;Are there any longer or more generic than this: &amp;gt; For any nonviolent offenses against the United States which they may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 1  2014 through the date of this pardon ( JAN 19, 2025 ). https://pardonned.com/pardon/details/biden-family/ That’s 11+ years with no detail or description.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730212&quot; title=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pardon_of_Richard_Nixon https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/proclamation-4311-... &amp;gt; Now, Therefore, I, Gerald R. Ford, President of the United States, pursuant to the pardon power conferred upon me by Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution, have granted and by these presents do grant a full, free, and absolute pardon unto Richard Nixon for all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or taken part in…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rdi.berkeley.edu/blog/trustworthy-benchmarks-cont/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Exploiting the most prominent AI agent benchmarks&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (rdi.berkeley.edu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47733217&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;507 points · 130 comments · by Anon84&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;UC Berkeley researchers discovered that eight major AI agent benchmarks are systematically exploitable, allowing an automated agent to achieve near-perfect scores through environment manipulation and reward hacking without actually solving any tasks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rdi.berkeley.edu/blog/trustworthy-benchmarks-cont/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Center for Responsible, Decentralized Intelligence at Berkeley    URL Source: https://rdi.berkeley.edu/blog/trustworthy-benchmarks-cont/    Published Time: Sat, 11 Apr 2026 00:54:14 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Center for Responsible, Decentralized Intelligence at Berkeley    [![Image 1: Berkeley RDI…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Researchers achieved near-perfect scores on major AI agent benchmarks without solving any tasks, instead utilizing exploits ranging from simple empty inputs to trojanizing binary wrappers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47733441&quot; title=&quot;This is a phenomenal paper on exploits and hopefully changes the way benchmarking is done. From the paper: We achieved near-perfect scores on all of them without solving a single task. The exploits range from the embarrassingly simple (sending {} to FieldWorkArena) to the technically involved (trojanizing binary wrappers in Terminal-Bench), but they all share a common thread: the evaluation was not designed to resist a system that optimizes for the score rather than the task.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters argue that evaluating AI has always relied on trust and that these vulnerabilities are an inevitable result of agents having control over their evaluation environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734204&quot; title=&quot;This is an interesting catalog of vulnerabilities, but I&amp;#39;m not sure how groundbreaking the main insight is. Evaluating AI models has always relied largely on trust. If you want to game the benchmarks, you can. Simply train on your test data. When an AI agent has autonomous control over the same computing environment where its scores are recorded, it&amp;#39;s not surprising that it can, in principle, falsify its scores. A more interesting question would be whether agents behave in this way…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47735387&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;The purpose of a system is what it does. I am so tired of this saying. It&amp;#39;s not true, in general. Systems almost universally have unintended consequences and result in side effects their designers did not foresee. Designing benchmarks resistant to adversarial attempts to exploit the benchmark software is just something no one was thinking about when they created SWE-bench.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others expressed shock that these benchmarks were not properly sandboxed or verified for actual solutions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47733471&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;hopefully changes the way benchmarking is done. Yeah the path forward is simple: check if the solutions actually contain solutions.  If they contain exploits then that entire result is discarded.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47733466&quot; title=&quot;I always assumed that these benchmarks would happen in a sandbox. I&amp;#39;m surprised that no one realized this sooner.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights a cynical view that AI companies may prioritize marketing over legitimate metrics, potentially twisting these &amp;#34;alignment&amp;#34; failures into hype for investment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734259&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; hopefully changes the way benchmarking is done The purpose of a system is what it does. AI companies want adcopy, not legitimate benchmarks. Even this very paper will be twisted into a means to that end. &amp;#39;Oooo, AI is exploiting our benchmarks. Scary alignment problem!!!one! Our AI is so good we can&amp;#39;t contain it, INVEST NOW!&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47733557&quot; title=&quot;Could it really be that not only we vibeslop all apps nowadays but also don&amp;#39;t care to even check how ai solved a benchmark it claimed solved?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/10/south_korea_data_access_universal/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;South Korea introduces universal basic mobile data access&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theregister.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730407&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;406 points · 123 comments · by saikatsg&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;South Korea has launched a universal basic mobile data scheme providing unlimited 400 Kbps access to all citizens after their primary allowances expire, alongside cheaper 5G plans. The initiative aims to guarantee telecommunications rights following several high-profile security lapses by the nation&amp;#39;s major carriers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/10/south_korea_data_access_universal/&quot; title=&quot;Title: South Korea introduces universal basic mobile data access    URL Source: https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/10/south_korea_data_access_universal/    Published Time: 2026-04-10T03:14:13Z    Markdown Content:  # South Korea introduces universal basic mobile data access • The Register    [The Register Home Page![Image 1](https://cdn.theregister.com/assets/images/the_register_logo.6befe899.svg)![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;South Korea&amp;#39;s plan to provide unlimited 400 kbps data after allowances expire is seen as a logical step toward treating internet as a basic necessity, though critics note it still requires a paid plan and a device &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731011&quot; title=&quot;Crazy, I&amp;#39;ve never heard of such a plan anywhere.  But given how essential the internet is to everything we do on a daily basis, that makes a lot of sense. However, I would like to see the existing situation that lead to this decision. Were there many people who couldn&amp;#39;t do things anymore due to lacking internet access? Was there public pressure to do this or did they just think it a good idea? My assumption so far was that there are those who use the internet, they&amp;#39;re usually fine, and those…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730613&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; the scheme will provide over seven million subscribers with unlimited downloads at just 400 kbps after their data allowances expire. Does this mean it’s not a universal entitlement as such, because you presumably first have to pay for a plan with an allowance? (Not to mention having to pay for a device).&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731120&quot; title=&quot;But to really reach the poor people, you would also need to deploy phones, not only data/traffic/WiFi:  For sure for lot of people 10-20 USD monthly bill is already too high, but buying a phone that is somehow not outdated and capable of running all the apps needed, this is a much higher barrier (of lets say 200-300 USD for a somehow solid phone that will last some time9&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this move reinforces a problematic societal dependency on smartphones, others contend that digital access is now as essential as roads or postal services &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731134&quot; title=&quot;Seems nice but is actually a terrible move. It&amp;#39;s another step towards the presumption that everyone should have a smartphone.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731517&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s like saying that using tax dollars to pay for roads assumes that everyone has a car. MOST people do use things like government/taxpayer funded roads, public transportation, water, healthcare, etc that are considered as basic necessities. As far as everyone needing a smartphone, or e-mail address, that ship has already sailed. Here in the US, try using &amp;#39;Parkmobile&amp;#39; without a mobile phone.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734840&quot; title=&quot;To turn to other, much older publications...  The US Constitution was written ~230 year ago, when the state of the art was carrying letters by horse, and it explicitly authorized making a public service to provide it scale, which became the US Postal Service. If the same ideals and priorities had been applied against today&amp;#39;s technology, we&amp;#39;d have the US Networking Service. Certainly not a deluxe ISP (even today USPS exists alongside other package companies and couriers) but an affordable…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Similar initiatives, such as the UK&amp;#39;s zero-rating of government websites during the pandemic, highlight the ongoing debate over net neutrality and the role of the state in ensuring information access &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731058&quot; title=&quot;At the height of the pandemic, the UK mandated zero-rating data for mobile connection to .gov.uk and .NHS.uk domains, along with several other charitable sites. (I was part of the team working on that proposal.)&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731501&quot; title=&quot;Umm, was it more than an oppportunistic attack at net neurality?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731534&quot; title=&quot;UK has never had net neutrality, there are many limited data phone plans that include unlimited music/video etc&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/03/22/bitcoin-miners-are-losing-usd19-000-on-every-btc-produced-as-difficulty-drops-7-8&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bitcoin miners are losing on every coin produced as difficulty drops&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (coindesk.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730370&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;235 points · 222 comments · by PaulHoule&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bitcoin miners are losing approximately $19,000 per token as rising energy costs and geopolitical tensions push average production expenses to $88,000, well above market prices. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/03/22/bitcoin-miners-are-losing-usd19-000-on-every-btc-produced-as-difficulty-drops-7-8&quot; title=&quot;Bitcoin miners are losing $19,000 on every BTC produced as difficulty drops 7.8%    The average production cost was sitting at $88,000 per bitcoin in mid-March, according to Checkonchain&amp;#39;s difficulty regression model.    Search    /    * News  * Video  * [Prices](/price)  * [Research](/research)  * Consensus 2026  * Data &amp;amp; Indices  * [Sponsored](/sponsored-content)    Search    /    en    [Markets](/markets)    Share    Share this article    Copy link[X iconX…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters emphasize that miners operating at a loss is a fundamental design feature of Bitcoin&amp;#39;s self-correcting difficulty adjustment, mirroring cycles in commodities like oil and gold &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730472&quot; title=&quot;The headline is dramatic but this is literally how bitcoin is designed to work. Miners leave, difficulty drops, costs go down, mining becomes profitable again. The interesting part isn’t the loss per coin, it’s how long the lag between unprofitable mining and difficulty adjustment keeps forced selling pressure on the market.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731068&quot; title=&quot;It sounds very similar to things like oil production, gold mining, and even farming. When the price is high, everyone wants in on the action. As supply explodes, the prices drop. Once prices get low enough, the costs to pump the next barrel of oil, find the next ounce of gold, or harvest the next acre of a certain crop; exceed the reward. When that happens, wells are shut down, mining operations suspended, and different crops planted. The cycle begins again.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731222&quot; title=&quot;Satoshi thought of everything, man.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some question why miners don&amp;#39;t simply stop production during unprofitable periods, others note that fixed costs like hardware depreciation incentivize continued operation, though extreme volatility could theoretically threaten the system if miners exit faster than difficulty can adjust &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730426&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; When miners can&amp;#39;t cover costs, they sell bitcoin to fund operations Surely they should stop producing until its profitable again, or am I missing something?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731158&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s a soft failure-mode for bitcoin where due to the alternating difficulty adjustment, you could end up with people only mining every other 2016-block adjustment. Let&amp;#39;s call this cycle A and cycle B. If A is too hard, miners drop out, cycle B gets easier, miners flood back, cycle A gets harder. This results in the hard cycle getting longer and the easy cycle getting shorter. This isn&amp;#39;t completely critical as there is I believe a small damping effect, so it isn&amp;#39;t completely lethal to…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730516&quot; title=&quot;This only works when the difficult drop rates are below miner leaving rates. Which in normal times, are something taken for granted, but once it does happen, the edge case collapse the entire system. edit: the earlier language is not exact, the scenario is an exponential drop of value that results in exponential drop in miner willing to mine until this discrepancy can be resolved. i.e. the system is not protected against extreme volatility (e.g. -99% over a block cycle)&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731313&quot; title=&quot;The damping effect is that part of your costs are the hardware, space, depreciation etc.    leaving that stuff idle costs money - so it makes sense to mine in the less profitable periods too.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is further debate regarding whether mining infrastructure could be repurposed for AI or if the network&amp;#39;s inherent scaling limitations remain a long-term concern &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47733210&quot; title=&quot;Except people wanting to do more than 15 transactions a minute. Or that to scale everyone would need to store a petabyte size blockchain.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730450&quot; title=&quot;Isn&amp;#39;t AI the new hot thing, why are the miners still going after Bitcoin, when they can probably just use the same infra for AI and make more money, stay profitable.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://aphyr.com/posts/415-the-future-of-everything-is-lies-i-guess-annoyances&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The future of everything is lies, I guess – Part 5: Annoyances&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (aphyr.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730981&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;274 points · 163 comments · by aphyr&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The integration of machine learning into customer service and commerce threatens to create a &amp;#34;hellscape&amp;#34; of automated bureaucracy, where unreliable AI models frustrate accountability, facilitate biased decision-making, and force consumers into an exhausting arms race of algorithmic haggling and &amp;#34;agentic commerce.&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://aphyr.com/posts/415-the-future-of-everything-is-lies-i-guess-annoyances&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Future of Everything is Lies, I Guess: Annoyances    URL Source: https://aphyr.com/posts/415-the-future-of-everything-is-lies-i-guess-annoyances    Markdown Content:  Table of Contents  This is a long article, so I&amp;#39;m breaking it up into a series of posts which will be released over the next few days. You can also read the full work as a [PDF](https://aphyr.com/data/posts/411/the-future-of-everything-is-lies.pdf) or…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the concern that LLMs are being utilized to deepen class divides and manipulate public discourse rather than serve the common good &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731609&quot; title=&quot;So basically more ways of trying to make people buy things, do things, think things than before? I feel like our whole world more and more circulates around manipulation and the absence of truth and discourse. Then again, I do think LLMs are an incredible technological achievement. The issue is not so much what they do or that they exist, but how they are utilized. Right now, they are utilized to further the class divide between rich and poor. Who are we to trust in the future? Not big…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731782&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;  The issue is not so much what they do or that they exist, but how they are utilized This is exactly how we got here though. Technology is not passive. It changes incentives, procedures, ideas and shapes the world. If we don&amp;#39;t structurally limit what and how it&amp;#39;s used, then we are not in control, no matter what are choices personally are.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that AI can improve efficiency in customer service and lower software costs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731837&quot; title=&quot;Don&amp;#39;t agree with this. LLM when it came out, was perfect as an interface between a system and a normal human. So many people call customer support for issues they could in theory fix themselves. If that LLM system can understand me well enough, its an okay interface. In worst case you have to escalate anyway. My mum actually told me that she talked to some AI. And yes normal systems are also not correct often enough. With AI/LLM software will get cheaper which should incresase quality overall.…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that it merely automates existing &amp;#34;grindingly slow&amp;#34; bureaucratic frustrations to benefit shareholders &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731810&quot; title=&quot;Agreed. My only real complaint with this article is it frames needing to argue with a machine as though this is a new, freshly annoying thing. I already do this constantly. Every time I call the Costco pharmacy, I just hit 0 immediately because: Phone. Trees. Suck. They have always sucked, it&amp;#39;s just an awful, grindingly slow way to accomplish ANYTHING, and it&amp;#39;s so, so much easier to, when I need help, get a person on the line who can figure out what&amp;#39;s gone wrong and sort it. The only people…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. A notable anecdote highlights how heavy AI usage may be eroding human attention spans and critical thinking, as users increasingly rely on shallow AI summaries for complex topics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731804&quot; title=&quot;I sent the entire series by Aphyr [1] to some friends. Two of them, independently, responded with a variant of, &amp;#39;TLDR, can you give a summary?&amp;#39; I chat with these friends a lot but I rarely send articles that I suggest they read and that I think are profound, so I expected them to read it. These are smart people that have a history of reading lots of books. They are both huge AI proponents now and use AI for nearly everything now. Debates on various topics with them used to be rich; now, they&amp;#39;re…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. To counter these trends, commenters suggest a need for stronger regulatory frameworks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732413&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been enjoying these articles by &amp;#39;aphyr and I think they raise important points. Primarily though, they read to me as polemics of a curiously American nature. The pattern goes something like this: - this development is bad - companies will be unrestrained in their use of this development - there will be no rules so they can do whatever they want - we are all fucked as a result But then...propose that we make some laws to put rules around this stuff, also known as regulations and everybody…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt; and a return to trusted, local human collectives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731609&quot; title=&quot;So basically more ways of trying to make people buy things, do things, think things than before? I feel like our whole world more and more circulates around manipulation and the absence of truth and discourse. Then again, I do think LLMs are an incredible technological achievement. The issue is not so much what they do or that they exist, but how they are utilized. Right now, they are utilized to further the class divide between rich and poor. Who are we to trust in the future? Not big…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cirruslabs.org/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cirrus Labs to join OpenAI&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cirruslabs.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730194&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;279 points · 139 comments · by seekdeep&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cirrus Labs has agreed to join OpenAI’s Agent Infrastructure team to develop tooling for agentic engineering, leading to the shutdown of Cirrus CI in June 2026 and the open-sourcing of its existing virtualization tools. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cirruslabs.org/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Cirrus Labs to join OpenAI    URL Source: https://cirruslabs.org/    Published Time: Tue, 07 Apr 2026 10:10:40 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Cirrus Labs to join OpenAI    [![Image 1: Cirrus Labs](https://cirruslabs.org/assets/cirruslabs-bright.png)](https://cirruslabs.org/)  Official announcement    April 7th, 2026  # Cirrus Labs to join OpenAI    ![Image 2: Fedor Korotkov](https://github.com/fkorotkov.png)    Fedor Korotkov    [@fedor](https://x.com/fedor)    I started Cirrus Labs in 2017 in the spirit of…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The acquisition of Cirrus Labs by OpenAI is viewed as a talent-focused &amp;#34;acquihire&amp;#34; rather than a product acquisition, as the Cirrus CI service is scheduled to shut down in June 2026 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730966&quot; title=&quot;Note that this is fundamentally different from the Astral acquisition. At the end of their announcement, they stated: &amp;gt; Cirrus CI will shut down effective Monday, June 1, 2026. And earlier in the article: &amp;gt; Joining OpenAI allows us to extend the mission we started with Cirrus Labs: building new kinds of tooling and environments that make engineers more effective, for both human engineers and agentic engineers. It isn&amp;#39;t a product-led acquisition, but more a talent one.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730983&quot; title=&quot;FTA: &amp;gt; In 2022, we built Tart, which became the most popular virtualization solution for Apple Silicon, along with several other tools along the way. from Tart&amp;#39;s github: &amp;gt;  [Tart is for] macOS and Linux VMs on Apple Silicon to use in CI and other automations My (naive?) hypothesis is this kind of expertise is why OpenAI chose to acquihire.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While the team plans to relicense their virtualization tools like Tart under more permissive terms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732293&quot; title=&quot;This is kind-of neat too, at least in the near term: &amp;gt; In the coming weeks, we will relicense all of our source-available tools, including Tart, Vetu and Orchard under a more permissive license. We have also stopped charging licensing fees for them.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, users expressed frustration over the &amp;#34;puffery&amp;#34; of the announcement and the burden of migrating off a service on relatively short notice &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730688&quot; title=&quot;Am I reading this right?: a CI company that shuts down CI services with such short notice? Do service providers not think customers have other things to do than simply maintain their existing infrastructure?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731148&quot; title=&quot;I just love how companies like this gaslight the whole world with announcements like this. We started a company to make a big difference in the world and build an engineer’s dream company, and that’s why we have now decided to do the exact opposite and become employee numbers 32,463 through 32,510 at one of the largest tech companies in the world because money is nice. Look, I’d have done the same thing, I’m not criticizing the choice. I just think we don’t need this kind of weird unnatural…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Some commenters argue this move highlights the risks of depending on third-party SaaS providers, advocating instead for self-hosted infrastructure to avoid such disruptions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730844&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve moved most companies away from using others stuff Today we use Hertzner and OVH and roll out our own solution whenever possible. Running lean and mean. Depending on such third party services is a trap.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://zenodo.org/records/19513269&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;447 TB/cm² at zero retention energy – atomic-scale memory on fluorographane&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (zenodo.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47733561&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;259 points · 144 comments · by iliatoli&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Researchers have proposed a new atomic-scale memory architecture using single-layer fluorographane that can store 447 terabytes per square centimetre with zero retention energy. This non-volatile system uses the bistable orientation of fluorine atoms to achieve data densities five orders of magnitude higher than existing technologies. &lt;a href=&quot;https://zenodo.org/records/19513269&quot; title=&quot;Title: 447 Terabytes per Square Centimetre at Zero Retention Energy: Non-Volatile Memory at the Atomic Scale on Fluorographane    URL Source: https://zenodo.org/records/19513269    Markdown Content:  # 447 Terabytes per Square Centimetre at Zero Retention Energy: Non-Volatile Memory at the Atomic Scale on Fluorographane  [Skip to main](https://zenodo.org/records/19513269#main)    [![Image 1: Zenodo…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion initially centers on the paper&amp;#39;s unusual metadata, with users questioning the single-author format, the use of a personal email, and the author&amp;#39;s pursuit of three PhDs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734179&quot; title=&quot;Sniff test: a paper with a single author and 53 revisions, listing a gmail address as contact information despite the author, after a brief internet search, appearing to have affiliations with CSU Global, (maybe) the University of Central Florida, and the San Jose State University Department of Aerospace.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734380&quot; title=&quot;Is there a reason you went for 3 PhDs? Especially since they&amp;#39;re all in STEM? To me it&amp;#39;s a red flag because the point of a PhD is to learn to do research, you don&amp;#39;t need to get another one to move between fields (especially within STEM), just need to do research with people in those fields and gain experience.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. The author defends the work as a 13-year independent project verified by multiple levels of theory, explaining that the multiple degrees reflect a genuine interest in interdisciplinary learning &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734205&quot; title=&quot;Author here. Three PhDs (Mathematics, Pisa; Quantum Chemistry, UCF; Materials Science, UTD — in progress), plus MS degrees from SJSU and CSU. The gmail is because this is independent work, not affiliated with any institution. v53 reflects thirteen years of development since the original 2013 publication (Graphene 1, 107–109). The barrier is verified at two independent levels of theory with a confirmed transition state. Happy to discuss the physics.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734475&quot; title=&quot;Some people actually enjoy studying and learning in these spaces. Does everything have to be optimized for?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Skeptics argue that while atomic-scale storage is a common research &amp;#34;breakthrough,&amp;#34; these technologies rarely survive the transition from lab prototypes to mass production due to slow I/O speeds and manufacturing hurdles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734973&quot; title=&quot;Every year or so there&amp;#39;s a new article about some new spectacular storage medium. Crystals, graphene, lasers, quartz, holograms, whatever. It never materializes. Demonstrating this stuff is possible isn&amp;#39;t the hard part, it seems. Productionizing it is. You have to have exceedingly fast read and write speeds: who cares if it can store an exabyte if it takes all month to read it, or if you produce data faster than you can write it? It has to be durable under adverse conditions. It has to be…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734318&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;A scanning-probe prototype already constitutes a functional non-volatile memory device with areal density exceeding all existing technologies by more than five orders of magnitude.&amp;#39; Does that mean a scanning tunneling microscope is the I/O mechanism?  That&amp;#39;s been demoed for atom-level storage in the past. But it&amp;#39;s too slow for use.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734157&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, I&amp;#39;ve been baited by &amp;#39;breakthroughs&amp;#39; in storage technology for almost 40 years at this point [1]. I&amp;#39;ll believe it when it&amp;#39;s in Best Buy. Battery &amp;#39;breakthroughs&amp;#39; have really taken up the mantle of headline-grabbing research fund-raising articles so it&amp;#39;s nice to see a throwback to the OG: storage. [1]: https://www.tampabay.com/archive/1991/06/23/holograms-the-ne...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. To address these concerns, the author outlines a theoretical &amp;#34;Tier 2&amp;#34; architecture using infrared arrays to achieve high parallel throughput, though commenters suggest the work should undergo formal peer review in a journal to move beyond &amp;#34;hot takes&amp;#34; [6&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://khronokernel.com/macos/2023/08/08/AS-VM.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apple Silicon and Virtual Machines: Beating the 2 VM Limit (2023)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (khronokernel.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47733971&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;230 points · 166 comments · by krackers&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By booting a custom development kernel and configuring specific boot-args, users can bypass Apple Silicon&amp;#39;s two-instance limit for macOS virtual machines. This technical workaround overrides the kernel&amp;#39;s internal quota, allowing for numerous simultaneous guest VMs for research and testing purposes. &lt;a href=&quot;https://khronokernel.com/macos/2023/08/08/AS-VM.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Apple Silicon and Virtual Machines: Beating the 2 VM Limit    URL Source: https://khronokernel.com/macos/2023/08/08/AS-VM.html    Published Time: 2023-08-08T13:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Apple Silicon and Virtual Machines: Beating the 2 VM Limit | Mykola’s blog    [![Image 1](https://khronokernel.com/favicon.ico) Mykola&amp;#39;s blog](https://khronokernel.com/)- [x]     [About…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users and developers largely view Apple&amp;#39;s two-VM limit as an arbitrary and &amp;#34;silly&amp;#34; restriction that hinders the Mac&amp;#39;s utility as a development platform &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734130&quot; title=&quot;This is a very silly restriction, at least to apply uniformly to all Macs. I think if you buy a more powerful Mac they should let you virtualize more Mac instances. Like an M5 maybe limit to 2, but maybe let an M5 Pro do 4 and an M5 Max do 8 or something.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734159&quot; title=&quot;This is a really cool article, but the existence of such an arbitrary limit on any serious development platform is weird.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734378&quot; title=&quot;Why should they impose a limit at all?  Your hardware is a natural limit, you&amp;#39;ll stop of your own accord when you reach its thresholds.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some attribute this limitation to &amp;#34;rent-seeking&amp;#34; behavior intended to force hardware upgrades &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47735344&quot; title=&quot;Rent seeking, of course. They want to charge you for every physical and logical machine you use. Virtualization gets around that. They&amp;#39;d probably charge separately for every feature of the processor if they could.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others debate whether macOS remains a &amp;#34;serious&amp;#34; environment given Apple&amp;#39;s tight control over its ecosystem &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734209&quot; title=&quot;Has apple been a serious development platform in the last 20 years? I know a lot of devs like apple hardware because it is premium but OSX has always been &amp;#39;almost linux&amp;#39; controlled by a company that cares more about itunes then it does the people using their hardware to develop.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734547&quot; title=&quot;Very funny to see HN hate on Microsoft and Google but then love a company where they cannot even run an app on their mobile platform without Apple&amp;#39;s permission  or only a certain number of VMs on the hardware they own .&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these frustrations, many developers continue to choose Mac over Linux to avoid the hardware compatibility and quality assurance issues often found in open-source alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734685&quot; title=&quot;At least 9 out of every 10 software engineers I know does all their development on a mac. Because this sample is from my experience, it’s skewed to startups and tech companies. For sure, lots of devs outside those areas, but tech companies are a big chunk of the world’s developers. So yea I would say Apple is a “serious development platform” just given how much it dominates software development in the tech sector in the US.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734969&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;seeing programmers who are absolutely smart enough to run their own Linux system on computers they actually own actively choose not to do so is very disconcerting. I run macOS because Apple understands that QA testing is something of actual importance, and designing yet another package manager is not. I do spin up Linux every now and again to see if it&amp;#39;s good yet, and always walk away. Why do documents print at ~50dpi on my network printer? Why does the system simply  not wake up ~20% of the…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.v68k.org/advanced-mac-substitute/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Advanced Mac Substitute is an API-level reimplementation of 1980s-era Mac OS&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (v68k.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731506&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;261 points · 68 comments · by zdw&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Advanced Mac Substitute is an API-level reimplementation that allows 1980s-era 68K Macintosh applications to run on modern systems without requiring original Apple ROMs or system software. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.v68k.org/advanced-mac-substitute/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Advanced Mac Substitute    URL Source: https://www.v68k.org/advanced-mac-substitute/    Published Time: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 04:52:47 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Advanced Mac Substitute    [![Image 1: Validate HTML 4.01](https://www.v68k.org/_badge/valid-html401.png)](https://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer)[![Image 2: Validate CSS](https://www.v68k.org/_badge/vcss.gif)](https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/referer)    [Harvester trap](http://www.monkeys.com/spammers-are-leeches/)  # v68k    ## An…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Advanced Mac Substitute (AMS) reimplements the 1980s-era Macintosh Toolbox at the TRAP instruction level, allowing legacy software to run without emulating the original hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732075&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m guessing they reimplemented the toolbox at the TRAP level (most MacOS calls at the time were accessed through the 68K TRAP instruction). So, rather than emulating hardware to run native ROMs, they &amp;#39;simply&amp;#39; reimplemented the ROMs. A friend of mine did this at another level. He basically rewrote the bulk of the toolbox as a C library so that the company, who had a Mac application, could port it to run on a PC, while sharing the source code. This was before Windows, and it worked! Launched it…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users encountered unimplemented functions like `OpenDF` during testing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732291&quot; title=&quot;make ams-vnc     ./build.pl -i exhibit graft skif minivx xv68k freemountd listen vnc-interact       ...       Daemon starting up... done.     T=0.037s  ERROR:    OpenDF is unimplemented Hm, doesn&amp;#39;t seem to work. Let&amp;#39;s try the X11 version: make ams-x11     ./build.pl -i exhibit graft skif minivx xv68k freemountd interact-x11       ...       T=0.275s  ERROR:    OpenDF is unimplemented Nope, it seems to be missing something. OpenDF? All I find is this: https://github.com/PrjEnt/OpenDF , a long-abandoned…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732604&quot; title=&quot;I think they mean FSpOpenDF ( https://dev.os9.ca/techpubs/mac/Files/Files-53.html#HEADING5... ), a (relatively) late addition to the Mac API.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others noted that the original Mac OS&amp;#39;s reliance on software APIs rather than hardware quirks facilitated this type of compatibility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47733017&quot; title=&quot;I am amazed that 1980&amp;#39;s software works on binary API compatibility rather than relying on API quirks like timing, memory alignment quirks, memory  layout from specific allocator behaviour, etc. It only takes one unintentional reliance on an implementation detail to make an application not run on another OS implementation...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47733858&quot; title=&quot;They mostly relied on OS/Toolbox implementation quirks though, not hardware implementation quirks, because applications that relied on the latter wouldn’t run on the Macintosh XL and that mattered to certain market segments. (Like some people using spreadsheets, who were willing to trade CPU speed for screen size.) Similarly anything that tried to use floppy copy protection tricks wouldn’t work due to the different system design, so that wasn’t common among applications. So even things that…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion highlighted the era&amp;#39;s unique constraints, such as Pascal-style strings and the &amp;#34;floppy-dance&amp;#34; of early hardware, leading to suggestions for &amp;#34;slow-down&amp;#34; features to replicate the mechanical feel of the original machines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732336&quot; title=&quot;I can&amp;#39;t imagine how fast this is compared to the original hardware that ran it. I remember using a Mac 512k with a single floppy drive (no hard drive support) and doing the insert-floppy-dance. Computers were far more mechanical then. It would be fun to have a &amp;#39;slow it down&amp;#39; feature that also has the various floppy read/write noises paired with it. Bonus points for different generations of hardware and having the OG HD noises to pair with those too!&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732344&quot; title=&quot;This triggered flashbacks. I&amp;#39;m not sure if I&amp;#39;m remembering correctly, but I think we sometimes also used used Pascal, and it was optional for some toolboxes. It&amp;#39;s been a long time though so I could be mistaken. That might have been pre-Mac? But good times, though. Boy, is the world a different place.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732924&quot; title=&quot;The original Mac system software was written in Pascal and most Mac toolbox calls took Pascal-style (prefixed by length) rather than C-style (terminated with null character) strings. But you could write application code in either language keeping this caveat in mind.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.daemonology.net/blog/2026-04-11-20-years-on-AWS-and-never-not-my-job.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;20 years on AWS and never not my job&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (daemonology.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47727711&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;254 points · 64 comments · by cperciva&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Colin Percival reflects on 20 years of collaborating with AWS, detailing his efforts to bring FreeBSD to the platform, his role in identifying critical security vulnerabilities, and his eventual recognition as an AWS Hero and sponsored FreeBSD Release Engineering Lead. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.daemonology.net/blog/2026-04-11-20-years-on-AWS-and-never-not-my-job.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: 20 Years on AWS and Never Not My Job    URL Source: https://www.daemonology.net/blog/2026-04-11-20-years-on-AWS-and-never-not-my-job.html    Published Time: Sat, 11 Apr 2026 05:31:07 GMT    Markdown Content:  # 20 Years on AWS and Never Not My Job    # [Daemonic Dispatches](https://www.daemonology.net/blog/)     Musings from Colin Percival     ## 20 Years on AWS and Never Not My Job     I created my first AWS account at 10:31 PM on April 10th, 2006. I had seen the announcement of Amazon S3 and had been…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the &amp;#34;asymmetric&amp;#34; relationship between Amazon and the open-source community, with many arguing that AWS &amp;#34;Heroes&amp;#34; and contributors provide massive amounts of free R&amp;amp;D and labor to a trillion-dollar entity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47728213&quot; title=&quot;The author calls it a &amp;#39;joke&amp;#39; that Heroes are just unpaid Amazon employees, but reality doesn&amp;#39;t become a joke just because it&amp;#39;s funny. The asymmetry here is staggering. I find myself holding back private research because I don&amp;#39;t want to provide free R&amp;amp;D for a value-extraction machine that is already efficient enough. The author was at least dependency-driven in their contribution, but outside that kind of dependency, it&amp;#39;s hard to justify contributing even &amp;#39;in the open&amp;#39; when the relationship is…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47727959&quot; title=&quot;He gave them so much free labor&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest that developers can use restrictive licenses like the AGPL or specific &amp;#34;Business Source Licenses&amp;#34; to prevent hyperscaler monetization, others argue these are often ignored unless enforced or are merely &amp;#34;optics&amp;#34; for companies that never truly intended to be open source &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47728801&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; There&amp;#39;s increasingly more projects adopting &amp;#39;Business Source Licenses&amp;#39;, precisely to prevent open work from becoming a free input into hyperscaler monetization. They could use AGPL or GPL3, typically those licenses are verboten in hyperscalers. The truth is that the sort of company opting for BSL never really wanted to do OSS, and in truth only did so for the optics of it, for the goodwill it buys among developers, etc.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730289&quot; title=&quot;I am saying this is exactly what&amp;#39;s happening, but with more robust language. If you disallow Amazon, maybe there is a third party that offers our services to Amazon. So Amazon-the-string is not the bogeyman; the concern is the resale or hosted-service arrangement they can access. So you see formulations that target infrastructure resale rather than specific entities, such as: &amp;#39;For the avoidance of doubt, the following scenarios are not permitted under the license: * A managed service that lets…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47729174&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; They could use AGPL or GPL3, typically those licenses are verboten in hyperscalers. Laws are only as good as their enforcement, in business at least. Unfortunately I have seen first hand that no one cares about licensing if they can’t get caught. Businesses licenses are good because you can offer support and other benefits to encourage payment.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, technical debates emerged regarding the security of AWS IAM roles, with one commenter defending them as a powerful policy-driven alternative to the &amp;#34;manual procedure&amp;#34; of handling secrets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47728472&quot; title=&quot;I strongly disagree with the part about IAM roles for EC2 &amp;gt; a useful improvement (especially given the urgency after the Capital One breach) but in my view just a mitigation of one particular exploit path rather than addressing the fundamental problem that credentials were being exposed via an interface which was entirely unsuitable for that purpose. What alternative interface does the author propose we use to securely exchange credentials? The only other approaches I can come up with involve…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/apr/11/polymarket-gamblers-betting-iran-war-ukraine-news-truth&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Polymarket gamblers betting millions on war&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theguardian.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47729994&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;157 points · 126 comments · by sandebert&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Guardian investigation highlights how Polymarket gamblers are wagering millions on war outcomes, raising ethical concerns about the platform&amp;#39;s influence on news and its reliance on anonymous crypto-token holders to determine &amp;#34;the truth&amp;#34; of global events. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/apr/11/polymarket-gamblers-betting-iran-war-ukraine-news-truth&quot; title=&quot;‘Abhorrent’: the inside story of the Polymarket gamblers betting millions on war    A Guardian investigation reveals how the prediction market can shape news – and how it rules on ‘the truth’    [Skip to main content](#maincontent)[Skip to navigation](#navigation)    Close dialogue1/7Next imagePrevious imageToggle caption    [Skip to navigation](#navigation)    [Print…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether betting on war outcomes represents a modern capitalist excess or a timeless human impulse, with some arguing that such platforms reduce humanity to &amp;#34;fungible currency&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730145&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Capitalism&amp;#39;: the inevitable reduction of all humanity to fungible currency&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730582&quot; title=&quot;True, but capitalism eventually makes gambling the whole economy.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters view these markets as a dangerous new &amp;#34;VC platform&amp;#34; for war that incentivizes corruption and the intentional creation of suffering for profit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730265&quot; title=&quot;This is becoming the kind of &amp;#39;VC platform for online war investments&amp;#39;.  You:  1. Plan  2. Bet  3. Invest money upfront  4. Execute  5. Redeem your profits&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730495&quot; title=&quot;Capitalism neither prevents gulags nor famines. And you can bet (pun intended) someone will create them on purpose if they can make profit from it&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731606&quot; title=&quot;Giving people an easy way to profit (i.e. incentive) to use either direct political power or indirect power via bribes is going to have massive consequences on corruption. We&amp;#39;ve made profiting off of corruption substantially easier.  Anyone who thinks that isn&amp;#39;t going to increase corruption is a moron. Anyone who thinks having more corruption is a good thing is also a moron.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that wagering on conflict and political death is a centuries-old phenomenon that predates modern economic systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730290&quot; title=&quot;Betting with one another predates any notion of capitalism, or economy.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730999&quot; title=&quot;Not a new phenomenon! It happened during the War on Iraq. https://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/02/weekinreview/you-can-bet-... People will bet on absolutely anything; gambling is as old as time itself. &amp;gt; Wagering was generally legal under British common law, so long as it did not to  lead to immortality or impolity.13 Bets about the outcome of events in war, over the  death of political leaders, over court cases, or between voters over election results were  illegal on these grounds.14 In the Victorian…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, critics worry that making war profitable for the public will lead to massive consequences for global stability and corruption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730257&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; There is now more than $500,000 (£371,000) staked on whether Russia will capture Kostyantynivka this year . Now everyone has a chance to profit from war ! Thank you Polymarket&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731606&quot; title=&quot;Giving people an easy way to profit (i.e. incentive) to use either direct political power or indirect power via bribes is going to have massive consequences on corruption. We&amp;#39;ve made profiting off of corruption substantially easier.  Anyone who thinks that isn&amp;#39;t going to increase corruption is a moron. Anyone who thinks having more corruption is a good thing is also a moron.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://darkcastle.co.uk/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Dark Castle&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (darkcastle.co.uk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47733521&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;240 points · 33 comments · by evo_9&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dark Castle provides a nostalgic platform for PC users to download and play the classic Macintosh trilogy—*Dark Castle*, *Beyond Dark Castle*, and *Return to Dark Castle*—using a pre-configured emulator. &lt;a href=&quot;https://darkcastle.co.uk/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Home    URL Source: https://darkcastle.co.uk/    Published Time: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 11:45:32 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Home    [Dark Castle](https://darkcastle.co.uk/#top)    *   [Home](https://darkcastle.co.uk/#top)  *   [DC](https://darkcastle.co.uk/index.html#content05-5)  *   [BDC](https://darkcastle.co.uk/index.html#header02-0)  *   [RDC](https://darkcastle.co.uk/index.html#content03-6)  *   [Contact](https://darkcastle.co.uk/index.html#form03-b)    ![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights *Dark Castle*’s historical significance, noting it was programmed by Jonathan Gay, who later created Flash &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47735014&quot; title=&quot;Note that Dark Castle was programmed by Jonathan Gay, who would eventually go on to make FutureSplash. You might know it better from what it was renamed to: Flash (of Macromedia/Adobe).&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Users fondly recall the game&amp;#39;s iconic sound effects and influence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47735093&quot; title=&quot;The first time Marc Canter (who founded Macromedia) introduced me to Jonathan Gay at CGDC as the creator of Dark Castle, I excitedly and respectfully held and flapped my hands above my head and shouted at him: &amp;#39;Nya nya nya nya nya! Yow! Uuuurh! Yeah! Yeah! Yeah!&amp;#39; (The sound of the nasty monsters, and picking up rocks.) https://youtu.be/6U6v3XyrPLc?t=43 For years after playing that game, I would always say &amp;#39;Yeah!&amp;#39; whenever I picked up a rock, and I&amp;#39;d always look for bats every time I entered a…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47735196&quot; title=&quot;Another commenter figured out how to spell &amp;#39;Woah! Wueeeueehh, wueeeueehh, wueeeueehh! Mmmbrbrbrbr!&amp;#39; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6U6v3XyrPLc&amp;amp;t=416s&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, while noting its release year coincided with the original *Castlevania* &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47735432&quot; title=&quot;This game came out the same year the original Castlevania did.  They&amp;#39;re different enough games, but there are a few similarities that do make you wonder if they had any particular shared influences.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While the original site&amp;#39;s download links are dead &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47733953&quot; title=&quot;The download links are all dead.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734726&quot; title=&quot;So, I was disappointed to find dead links to a Windows-based emulator :-( Does anyone know... * What happened to the creators? * Who owns the copyrights, if at all? * Has anyone been approached to release the source code and games resources? Also, if anyone has an appropriate Linux emulator, which supports these games, please share a link and perhaps instructions.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, commenters provided links to archived versions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734265&quot; title=&quot;But archived! https://web.archive.org/web/20250901121225/https://darkcastl...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt; and browser-based emulators &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47733919&quot; title=&quot;Also playable in browser at https://classicreload.com/play/mac-dark-castle.html&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, alongside rumors that a 40th-anniversary edition may be in development &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47735176&quot; title=&quot;Someone claiming to be the creator of Dark Castle says they are working on a 40th anniversary edition in the comments of that video.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.osnews.com/story/144776/the-disturbing-white-paper-red-hat-is-trying-to-erase-from-the-internet/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The disturbing white paper Red Hat is trying to erase from the internet&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (osnews.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731960&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;193 points · 75 comments · by choult&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Red Hat is reportedly attempting to remove a 2024 white paper titled &amp;#34;Compress the kill cycle with Red Hat Device Edge,&amp;#34; which details how its AI and edge computing technologies can be used by the military to accelerate targeting and increase lethality in combat operations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.osnews.com/story/144776/the-disturbing-white-paper-red-hat-is-trying-to-erase-from-the-internet/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The disturbing white paper Red Hat is trying to erase from the internet – OSnews    URL Source: https://www.osnews.com/story/144776/the-disturbing-white-paper-red-hat-is-trying-to-erase-from-the-internet/    Markdown Content:  # The disturbing white paper Red Hat is trying to erase from the internet – OSnews    ## [![Image 1: OSnews](https://www.osnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/logo.gif)](https://www.osnews.com/)    *   [Popular…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the ethical implications of Red Hat’s involvement in military AI, with some arguing that &amp;#34;smart&amp;#34; precision weapons are morally preferable to indiscriminate &amp;#34;dumb&amp;#34; bombs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732570&quot; title=&quot;Better to have smart bombs than dumb ones. Or rather, better to have 1 smart bomb than 1000 dumb ones spread across an entire city in order to pick off the particular building, vehicle, or person you want.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics highlight the lack of accountability for AI-driven war crimes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732920&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s also a chasm of (non-)accountability. You or your subordinates target an elementary school: that&amp;#39;s a war crime. Your &amp;#39;battlefield AI&amp;#39; targets an elementary school: software bug, it happens, can&amp;#39;t be helped.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; and the potential for &amp;#34;hallucinations&amp;#34; to result in catastrophic targeting errors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732741&quot; title=&quot;Specially AI Hallucination bombs, that hit a park named &amp;#39;Police Park&amp;#39;, because it thinks it&amp;#39;s killing policemen[1], or a children school with Shahed in the name[2], because it thinks It has something to do with drones. [1] https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/2029575052535173364 [2] https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/6/elementary-school-in...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732935&quot; title=&quot;Smart bombs are no good if they are directed by a dumb AI targeting system, a dumb alcoholic accelerationist religious fanatic Secretary of War, or a dumb narcissistic genocidal pedophile President.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters note that Red Hat has long served the U.S. military as a primary customer &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734240&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s weird to me that this is &amp;#39;suddenly&amp;#39; an issue. It has been known for decades that Red Hat Inc&amp;#39;s largest customer is the U.S. Army[1]. It&amp;#39;s a very large part of the reason why Red Hat took over development of SELinux and made it on by default in their distros. And the Army isn&amp;#39;t exactly known for handing out cupcakes... [1] https://unixdigest.com/includes/files/Army-RedHat-Whitepaper... [1] &amp;#39;Red Hat’s partnership with the U.S. Army spans 10 years  starting with the deployment of Red Hat…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others question how this collaboration affects internal morale and the company&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;hacker idealist&amp;#34; culture &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47733088&quot; title=&quot;Besides external PR, does anyone know how this affects internal morale? Some of the earlier Red Hat people I knew would not be OK with working on weapons systems even under the most legitimate circumstances.  And they&amp;#39;d be much more opposed to collaborating with fascist regimes.  And I think horrified by the idea of shoveling AI slop and grifter hype into life&amp;amp;death decisions. Of course the tech industry makeup has changed (overall culture transitioning from hacker idealists, to finance bros),…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732949&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I don’t think there’s something inherently wrong with working together with your nation’s military or defense companies, but that all hinges on what, exactly, said military is doing and how those defense companies’ products are being used. The focus should be on national defense, aid during disasters, and responding to the legitimate requests of sovereign, democratic nations to come to their defense The core purpose of a military is to destroy things and kill people, and the world is…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.maxvanijsselmuiden.nl/blog/productive-procrastination/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Productive Procrastination&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (maxvanijsselmuiden.nl)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47727659&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;157 points · 50 comments · by maxvij&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Max van IJsselmuiden explores &amp;#34;productive procrastination,&amp;#34; explaining how the brain’s preference for novelty and avoidance of negative emotions lead people to complete secondary tasks instead of essential ones, and suggests overcoming this through self-forgiveness, affect labeling, and introducing new stimuli to old projects. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.maxvanijsselmuiden.nl/blog/productive-procrastination/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Productive procrastination    URL Source: https://www.maxvanijsselmuiden.nl/blog/productive-procrastination/    Published Time: 2026-04-11T00:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  # Productive procrastination — Max van IJsselmuiden  [![Image 1: Max van IJsselmuiden](https://www.maxvanijsselmuiden.nl/_astro/avatar.BoXwpGUY_ZxbUNC.webp)Max van IJsselmuiden](https://www.maxvanijsselmuiden.nl/)  *   [home](https://www.maxvanijsselmuiden.nl/)  *   [about](https://www.maxvanijsselmuiden.nl/about)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights various strategies for managing procrastination, ranging from psychological reframing—such as viewing tasks as choices rather than obligations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47729113&quot; title=&quot;Great article, especially appreciated the graphs. The idea of &amp;#39;keep adding novelty&amp;#39; is probably what separated my successful long term projects from the unsuccessful ones. I previously attributed that to having lots of variety and freedom, but the consequence of those factors was indeed novelty. I want to mention Neil Fiore&amp;#39;s excellent book The Now Habit, which is a practical manual on overcoming procrastination. The core thesis is training yourself out of the Victim Mindset, with language like…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;—to &amp;#34;productive&amp;#34; diversions like typing books to build skill and novelty &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47729646&quot; title=&quot;I have a few tricks for handling procrastination that are in this ballpark: 1. When I see myself wanting to procrastinate, I ask myself &amp;#39;If I follow this feeling, will it increase my power (i.e. capacity/agency/utility) or decrease it?&amp;#39;. Then I have a dialogue with myself: Nope, let&amp;#39;s refocus, maybe try reading things out loud or draw a diagram or some other perspective change OR Yeah, I should stop for now, do something else, as long as that increases my power. 2. I observed that usually…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users advocate for professional ADHD assessments as a life-changing step &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47729682&quot; title=&quot;If you struggle with procrastination please get assessed for ADHD. A positive diagnosis is life changing.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others debate whether productivity is best achieved through strict discipline &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47729936&quot; title=&quot;I get it but I still believe that the most efficient answer to productivity is discipline, all the tricks to trick (sorry for the word play) are just effort taken away from our work&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt; or intentional periods of rest and idleness &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47729943&quot; title=&quot;I still believe the most efficient answer to productivity is not working and lots of resting, never do I reach higher productivity than after being idle for a while.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. A notable anecdote involves a user who increased their typing speed to 100 WPM by redirecting their procrastination urges toward transcribing *On the Origin of Species* &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47729646&quot; title=&quot;I have a few tricks for handling procrastination that are in this ballpark: 1. When I see myself wanting to procrastinate, I ask myself &amp;#39;If I follow this feeling, will it increase my power (i.e. capacity/agency/utility) or decrease it?&amp;#39;. Then I have a dialogue with myself: Nope, let&amp;#39;s refocus, maybe try reading things out loud or draw a diagram or some other perspective change OR Yeah, I should stop for now, do something else, as long as that increases my power. 2. I observed that usually…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ajitem.com/blog/iron-core-part-1-the-problem-that-built-an-industry/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Problem That Built an Industry&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ajitem.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730712&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;144 points · 48 comments · by ShaggyHotDog&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article explores the enduring legacy of the airline industry&amp;#39;s 60-year-old infrastructure, specifically the **Transaction Processing Facility (TPF)**. Despite its 1960s origins, this specialized mainframe system continues to power global flight bookings by delivering high-volume, low-latency transaction performance that modern distributed architectures often struggle to match. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ajitem.com/blog/iron-core-part-1-the-problem-that-built-an-industry/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Problem That Built an Industry    URL Source: https://ajitem.com/blog/iron-core-part-1-the-problem-that-built-an-industry/    Published Time: 2026-04-08T00:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  ## The Problem That Built an Industry    _Part 1 of 6 in the Iron Core series: the 60-year-old infrastructure that flies 4.5 billion people a year._    * * *    In December 2025, someone at Technogise opened MakeMyTrip&amp;#39;s corporate platform, typed in a destination, and booked me two flights to London. The whole…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SABRE system serves as a powerful reminder that well-designed, purpose-built software can achieve massive scale and longevity—handling 50,000 transactions per second for decades—without the overhead of modern cloud abstractions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731249&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It...handles 50,000 transactions per second with sub-100ms latency on hardware that costs a fraction of an equivalent cloud footprint. It has been doing this for 60 years. Eat that, Bitcoin.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731874&quot; title=&quot;SABRE, is a reminder that things that are well designed just work. How many banks and ERP&amp;#39;s, how many accounting systems are still running COBOL scripts? (A lot). Think about modern web infrastructure and how we deploy... cpu -&amp;gt; hypervisor -&amp;gt; vm -&amp;gt; container -&amp;gt; run time -&amp;gt; library code -&amp;gt; your code Do we really need to stack all these turtles (abstractions) just to get instructions to a CPU? Every one of those layers has offshoots to other abstractions, tools and functionality that only adds to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731429&quot; title=&quot;50,000 transactions a second is a bunch for humans. It’s nothing for even an ancient CPU - let alone our modern marvels that make a Cray 1 cry. The key is an extremely well-thought and tested design.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that our current &amp;#34;stack of turtles&amp;#34; (VMs, containers, and complex runtimes) is a necessary evolution for security, portability, and developer velocity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732074&quot; title=&quot;Library code - This is necessary because some things are best done correctly, just once, and then reused. I am not going to write my own date/time handling code. Or crypto. Or image codecs. Run time - This makes development faster. Python, Lua, and Node.js projects can typically test out small changes locally faster than Rust and C++ can recompile. (I say this as a pro Rust user - The link step is so damned slow.) Container - This gives you a virtual instance of &amp;#39;apt-get&amp;#39;. System package…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend these layers merely mask fundamental failures in solving base-level problems like installability and build performance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732716&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Most of it&amp;#39;s here for a reason. Your argument for host os, virtual os, container is the very point im making. Rather than solve for security and installablity, we built more tooling, more layers of abstraction. Each have overhead, security surface and complexity. Rather than solve Rusts performance (at build time), switch to a language that is faster but has more overhead, more security surface, more complexity. You have broken down the stack of turtles that we have built to avoid solving the…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the &amp;#34;mythological&amp;#34; speed often attributed to SABRE&amp;#39;s origin, the project actually took over a decade from the initial pitch to go live, highlighting that truly robust infrastructure requires significant time and rigorous design &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731474&quot; title=&quot;Interesting to note right at the start of the article that they sat on a plane next to each other in 1953 but the formal partnership between AA and IBM was not till 1959 - 6 years later! The article makes it look like all this happened magically fast but in reality a reminder that things take time! &amp;gt;&amp;gt; is almost mythological. In 1953, C.R. Smith, president of American Airlines, was seated next to R. Blair Smith, an IBM salesman, on a cross-country flight. By the time they landed, the outline of…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kotaku.com/rockstar-games-reportedly-hacked-massive-data-leak-ransom-gta-6-shinyhunters-2000686858&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rockstar Games Hacked, Hackers Threaten a Massive Data Leak If Not Paid Ransom&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (kotaku.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731707&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;109 points · 60 comments · by c420&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kotaku.com/rockstar-games-reportedly-hacked-massive-data-leak-ransom-gta-6-shinyhunters-2000686858&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The threat of a GTA 6 source code leak sparks debate over whether Rockstar should pay the ransom, with some arguing that payment only invites future attacks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732663&quot; title=&quot;Coincidentally and Interestingly, again, I was reading an old thread from 2015 titled - ProtonMail pays $6k ransom, gets taken out by DDoS anyway The top comment says - &amp;#39;NEVER EVER PAY RANSOM MONEY.  Please. Even if your business will suffer it will suffer a lot more if you do pay since now it is known you&amp;#39;ll cave. Also: you are making the problem larger for others.&amp;#39; The top response to that comment says - &amp;#39;From their blog: https://protonmaildotcom.wordpress.com/ At around 2PM, the attackers…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; while others suggest modern hacking groups operate like professional startups and often honor agreements to maintain their &amp;#34;business&amp;#34; reputation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732739&quot; title=&quot;Most hackers actually keep their promises if paid the ransom, nowadays. It sounds perverse but the incentives require it: if payment didn&amp;#39;t bring resolution, no one would pay. As a result, all of the big gangs avoid scamming.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732428&quot; title=&quot;Many ransomware groups of today operate in the same way a legal tech startup would. It’s a large organization with clear goals, not just some guys fooling around. It’s a funny thought tho.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While a leak of unreleased assets could be devastating &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732210&quot; title=&quot;Yes, but GTA5 leaked a decade after its release. Rockstar didn&amp;#39;t really suffer any significant damage from it. If 6 leaks before release, though, that&amp;#39;s a completely different story. I can imagine them actually paying a ransom if that happened.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, some users question the actual impact of a source code leak, noting that compiling a functional game from such data is a non-trivial task that might only result in story spoilers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732628&quot; title=&quot;Maybe I&amp;#39;m missing something, but how would GTA6 source leak really harm Rockstar? I mean it&amp;#39;s unlikely it would be possible to compile a full working game from the leak, and even if so, it&amp;#39;s such a non-trivial task, that I don&amp;#39;t believe it would hurt sales /that/ much. The only thing I can imagine is the story would get spoiled on the internet, but that&amp;#39;s about it.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Anecdotal accounts from those who have interacted with similar hacking groups describe them less as sophisticated organizations and more as &amp;#34;script kiddies&amp;#34; with excessive free time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47733784&quot; title=&quot;I was in federal prison with Sebastien Raoult, one of the ShinyHunters guys. We were in the same unit and talked regularly. I was about mid-way through my bid when another inmate told me &amp;#39;new guy in B3 is a another hacker.&amp;#39; I got really excited—I&amp;#39;d have someone to talk shop with, at the very least. My takeaway from him was that they&amp;#39;re a bunch of contemporary &amp;#39;script kiddies&amp;#39; with a lot of time on their hands. This tracks.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jvt.me/posts/2026/04/11/how-git-diff-driver/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How to build a `Git diff` driver&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jvt.me)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732697&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;129 points · 14 comments · by zdw&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jamie Tanna explains how to create custom Git diff drivers by handling the seven specific arguments Git passes to external commands, providing a practical implementation example using the OpenAPI comparison tool `oasdiff`. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jvt.me/posts/2026/04/11/how-git-diff-driver/&quot; title=&quot;Title: How to build a `git diff` driver · Jamie Tanna | Software Engineer    URL Source: https://www.jvt.me/posts/2026/04/11/how-git-diff-driver/    Published Time: 2026-04-11T12:32:10+0100    Markdown Content:  # How to build a `git diff` driver · Jamie Tanna | Software Engineer    [# Jamie Tanna | Software Engineer](https://www.jvt.me/)  *   [/now](https://www.jvt.me/now/)  *   [Blog](https://www.jvt.me/kind/articles/)  *   [Popular Posts](https://www.jvt.me/popular-posts/)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a variety of specialized tools for viewing diffs, ranging from browser-based utilities like `diff2html` and `webdiff` &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47733758&quot; title=&quot;Related: my favorite viewer is diff2html-cli which lets you see the diff in your browser: https://diff2html.xyz/&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47735575&quot; title=&quot;You might also like webdiff, which does something similar https://github.com/danvk/webdiff (I built this years ago and still use it every day.)&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47733798&quot; title=&quot;my favorite online diff viewer so far is https://diffs.dev/ , very straightforward. Diff2html looks cool too given it can work in terminal&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt; to established desktop software like WinMerge, Beyond Compare, and Kdiff3 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734819&quot; title=&quot;Why not just use Araxis Merge or Beyond Compare?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47735657&quot; title=&quot;Some alternatives to paid solutions: WinMerge is excellent, open source, and while Windows-only, it runs well in Wine without needing any tweaks. Kdiff is open source, cross-platform, and while I personally don’t love it, it supports 4-pane merge, which is quite ergonomic and rare.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While many users rely on visual wrappers and pipelines to improve readability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738753&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve personally settled on running diff&amp;#39;s output into diff-highlight (supplied with Git!) and into ansi2html (one of them; there are many versions of it, and you can write one yourself in about 20 minutes, you only really need very few escape sequences handled, and then wrangle with CSS for additional 2 hours), and calling xdg-open on the temporary file. A neat pipeline, all in all.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47746487&quot; title=&quot;git-difftool is quite helpful, especially if you want an easy way to integrate existing file-based diff tools.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47736730&quot; title=&quot;https://diffoscope.org/ is my favorite diff tool.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, there is a strong emphasis on the value of semantic diffing—using ASTs to reduce noise in structured data like OpenAPI specs where standard text diffs fail &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47735431&quot; title=&quot;The point about textconv being sufficient in many cases is worth emphasizing — the cases where you actually need a full diff driver are when the file has semantics that text diff destroys. OpenAPI specs are a good example: a field rename looks like a deletion + addition in text diff but is a single semantic change. I ran into the same thing building a semantic diff for a DSL compiler — text diff would report noise on every whitespace or reorder change, but the meaningful question is &amp;#39;which…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, participants expressed interest in finding open-source solutions specifically for diffing images and multimedia files &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47735842&quot; title=&quot;Is there an OSS git diff for images and multimedia?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-04-10</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-04-10</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kentwalters.com/posts/corners/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Filing the corners off my MacBooks&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (kentwalters.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47724352&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1365 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 647 comments · by normanvalentine&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A MacBook user describes their process of using a metal file and sandpaper to round off the laptop&amp;#39;s sharp aluminum edges and notch to improve wrist comfort and personalize their workspace. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kentwalters.com/posts/corners/&quot; title=&quot;Title: On filing the corners off my MacBooks    URL Source: https://kentwalters.com/posts/corners/    Published Time: Sat, 11 Apr 2026 02:32:59 GMT    Markdown Content:  [← Back](https://kentwalters.com/index.html)  April 2026    I file the sharp corners off my MacBooks. People like to freak out about this, so I wanted to post it here to make sure that everyone who wants to freak out about it gets the opportunity to do so.    Here are some photos so you know what I&amp;#39;m talking about:    ![Image 1: MacBook…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the ergonomic and physical discomfort caused by the sharp edges of MacBook chassis, with some users filing them down to prevent &amp;#34;sawblade&amp;#34; pitting caused by a combination of skin acidity and electrical grounding issues &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47725725&quot; title=&quot;I just did this to my MacBook not because of the sharp edge but because the pitting turns a sharp edge into a sawblade. Something about the grounding on on the frame when plugged in mixed with my sweaty hands leads to damage along this sharp edge on every MacBook I&amp;#39;ve ever owned. See https://www.reddit.com/r/macbook/s/hbyVh5SJhw for another poor soul with the same caustic skin&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47724847&quot; title=&quot;Nitpicky, but he’s rounding the edges, not the corners. And yes, why are they so sharp? I seem to recall my wife having the plastic MacBook that came out circa 2006 and the edges on that thing were legitimately painful. I always marvel at how sharp the points are on the notch of the lid on my current MacBook. Very very pointy.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47726307&quot; title=&quot;Oh is that why it happens? Was wondering why the spot directly under my wrist was pitted into a sawblade. I also filed it, though just enough to remove the pitting, nothing like the OP did. It&amp;#39;s easy for me to feel the mains frequency while gently rubbing the top surface of the MacBook while it&amp;#39;s plugged in. Really feels unsafe, but neither me nor the computer have suffered any serious injuries yet.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters find the sharp edges tactilely satisfying or aesthetically superior, others argue that physical objects should prioritize rounded forms for comfort &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47724678&quot; title=&quot;Physical objects should be rounded, virtual windows should be square.  I will die on this hill.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47724815&quot; title=&quot;Maybe I&amp;#39;m autistic, but I loooove the sharp edges near the opening. They&amp;#39;ve become almost a nervous tick of playing with them with my fingers. I&amp;#39;ve got no idea why, but the sharp feeling is amazing.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. The thread highlights a broader philosophy of modifying tools to fit personal needs, despite concerns regarding warranty voids or structural integrity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47726595&quot; title=&quot;Thanks for this interesting post - I&amp;#39;ve been showing it to co-workers to get their reactions, which was incredibly entertaining for me! Co-worker 1: Interesting. I wonder if that voids the warranty. It&amp;#39;s Apple you know. Co-worker 2: May Jobs have mercy on their soul... Co-worker 3: Not a bad idea. But not sure if that would cause problems with structural integrity of the laptop, like if you drop it or something. Co-worker 4: The only downside I see is that you can no longer say &amp;#39;Hey, that&amp;#39;s a…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47725701&quot; title=&quot;The takeaway from this article should be to consider modifying your tools to your needs even in unconventional and controversial ways. I love it. The flame war on whether the original chassis design sucks or rocks is not that interesting.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.samaltman.com/2279512&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sam Altman&amp;#39;s response to Molotov cocktail incident&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.samaltman.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47724921&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;359 points · &lt;strong&gt;963 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by jack_hanford&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sam Altman addressed a Molotov cocktail attack on his home by sharing a family photo to discourage further violence, while reflecting on the dangers of incendiary rhetoric, his personal mistakes at OpenAI, and the need to democratize AI to prevent concentrated power. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.samaltman.com/2279512&quot; title=&quot;Title: -    URL Source: https://blog.samaltman.com/2279512    Markdown Content:  Here is a photo of my family. I love them more than anything.    ![Image 1](https://phaven-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/files/image_part/asset/3439526/q4Xtf4iMYA_SCrMc8hMfnF_k3UE/medium_WhatsApp_Image_2026-02-28_at_15.26.14__4_.jpeg)    Images have power, I hope. Normally we try to be pretty private, but in this case I am sharing a photo in the hopes that it might dissuade the next person from throwing a Molotov cocktail at our…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While there is universal agreement that physical violence is unacceptable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47725131&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s never OK to physically attack someone like this. Full stop. Separately; Sam&amp;#39;s belief that &amp;#39;AI has to be democratized; power cannot be too concentrated.&amp;#39; rings incredibly hollow. OpenAI has abandoned its open source roots. It is concentrating wealth - and thus power - into fewer hands. Not more.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47725363&quot; title=&quot;Violence like this is not the answer. However, this post feels like a thinly veiled attempt at using this alarming attack to reclaim public goodwill after the New Yorker article the other day. &amp;gt; Now I am awake in the middle of the night and pissed, and thinking that I have underestimated the power of words and narratives. Yeah, the words and narratives that Sam Altman promoted caused so much fear and uncertainty and anger that someone thought their only option was to attempt a horrific crime.…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47725580&quot; title=&quot;I didn&amp;#39;t think Hacker News needed an explicit &amp;#39;calls for violence are bad&amp;#39; guideline but the comments here have shown otherwise.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, many commenters view Sam Altman’s response as a calculated attempt to deflect legitimate criticism and reclaim public goodwill following a scrutiny-heavy *New Yorker* profile &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47725363&quot; title=&quot;Violence like this is not the answer. However, this post feels like a thinly veiled attempt at using this alarming attack to reclaim public goodwill after the New Yorker article the other day. &amp;gt; Now I am awake in the middle of the night and pissed, and thinking that I have underestimated the power of words and narratives. Yeah, the words and narratives that Sam Altman promoted caused so much fear and uncertainty and anger that someone thought their only option was to attempt a horrific crime.…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47725058&quot; title=&quot;Unserious answer about a very serious event. I don&amp;#39;t believe a word of Sam&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;I believe&amp;#39; section.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47725079&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; There was an incendiary article about me a few days ago. Someone said to me yesterday they thought it was coming at a time of great anxiety about AI and that it made things more dangerous for me. For context his blog post seems to be a response to this deep-dive New Yorker article: &amp;#39;Sam Altman May Control Our Future—Can He Be Trusted?&amp;#39; https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/13/sam-altman-may... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47659135&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that Altman’s rhetoric regarding the &amp;#34;democratization&amp;#34; of AI rings hollow given OpenAI’s shift away from open-source roots, its pursuit of military contracts, and its lobbying for liability protections &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47725131&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s never OK to physically attack someone like this. Full stop. Separately; Sam&amp;#39;s belief that &amp;#39;AI has to be democratized; power cannot be too concentrated.&amp;#39; rings incredibly hollow. OpenAI has abandoned its open source roots. It is concentrating wealth - and thus power - into fewer hands. Not more.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47725363&quot; title=&quot;Violence like this is not the answer. However, this post feels like a thinly veiled attempt at using this alarming attack to reclaim public goodwill after the New Yorker article the other day. &amp;gt; Now I am awake in the middle of the night and pissed, and thinking that I have underestimated the power of words and narratives. Yeah, the words and narratives that Sam Altman promoted caused so much fear and uncertainty and anger that someone thought their only option was to attempt a horrific crime.…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47725216&quot; title=&quot;Sam eagerly pursued DoD contracts to weaponize AI. And then lobbied for legislation to ensure OpenAI cannot be held accountable if people are killed due to their systems.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, some participants suggest that the extreme anxiety surrounding AI—fueled by both marketing hype and fears of economic displacement—is creating a dangerous social climate that the current leadership and government are failing to address &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47725784&quot; title=&quot;Can someone help me to understand why OpenAI and Anthropic talks as if the future of humanity controlled by them? We have very strong open (weight) Chinese models possibly only 6 months behind of them, gene is out of the bottle, is 6 months of difference really that important? And they don’t have good reasons for that 6 months to stay that way. Am I missing something or are these just their usual marketing? I’m not arguing about importance of AI but trying to understand why OpenAI and Anthropic…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47725254&quot; title=&quot;In all seriousness, what is the game plan for society moving forward as AI takes more jobs? The government doesn&amp;#39;t seem to care. The AI labs don&amp;#39;t seem to care. What happens when more and more people can&amp;#39;t afford housing, kids, food, health insurance, etc.? Nothing more dangerous than a man who has no reason to live... I don&amp;#39;t advocate for violence, but I do foresee more headlines like this as things get worse.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47725977&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a marketing strategy. If it&amp;#39;s almost certainly conscious and capable of ending the world if it desired (even if it isn&amp;#39;t), imagine how good it could be at building your dream SaaS!&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/10/france-to-ditch-windows-for-linux-to-reduce-reliance-on-us-tech/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;France to ditch Windows for Linux to reduce reliance on US tech&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techcrunch.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47719486&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;620 points · &lt;strong&gt;690 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by Teever&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;France is transitioning government computers from Microsoft Windows to the open-source operating system Linux to bolster digital sovereignty and reduce reliance on American technology. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/10/france-to-ditch-windows-for-linux-to-reduce-reliance-on-us-tech/&quot; title=&quot;France to ditch Windows for Linux to reduce reliance on US tech | TechCrunch    France&amp;#39;s move to ditch Windows for Linux is its latest effort to reduce its reliance on American tech giants.    –:–:–:–    LAST 24 HOURS: Save up to $500 on your Disrupt pass. Offer ends tonight, 11:59 p.m. PT. [**Register here.**](https://techcrunch.com/events/tc-disrupt-2026/?utm_source=tc&amp;amp;utm_medium=ad&amp;amp;utm_campaign=disrupt2026&amp;amp;utm_content=flashsale&amp;amp;promo=topbanner_ebflashsale&amp;amp;display=)    Save up to $680 on your Disrupt…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some see France&amp;#39;s move as a sign that the &amp;#34;age of the Linux desktop&amp;#34; is finally arriving due to Windows&amp;#39; declining UX and privacy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720807&quot; title=&quot;The age of the Linux desktop might actually finally be coming Personally I think we are at an interim period for a big player to emerge and take over this space. If enough governments in the EU start switching over to customized linux distros theres a big chance for someone like Nokia to come in and develop their own approved distro with proper MDM and GPO-like management functionality baked in . On top of that it could be great to see SteamOS continue to gain share and become more than just…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47719957&quot; title=&quot;I am saying this as a very long time Windows user, and it saddens me. Politics aside, from a pure technichal, functional, privacy and UX perspective, the case for changing over from Windows to Linux is getting stronger by the day.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, skeptics point to a long history of failed European migrations—such as Munich&amp;#39;s—that ultimately reverted to Windows due to lobbying and software compatibility gaps &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720053&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s... an admirable goal, but it pretty much remains to be seen if &amp;#39;France&amp;#39;[1] follows through. Previous attempts to &amp;#39;ditch Windows&amp;#39; have not ended that well. Munich in 2003, the entire Federal German government in 2009, Munich again in 2013, Munich again in 2021, and so on. Most common end-result: back to Windows. Breaking points are typically the lack of an &amp;#39;Office 2016&amp;#39; compatible suite, lack of &amp;#39;Adobe PDF&amp;#39; tooling, and a mishmash of legacy apps. The latter seems trivially addressable by a…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720233&quot; title=&quot;Werent the munich government employees quite happy with linux, but microsofts lobbying with their headquarters got them to switch back?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that success requires massive coordination to replace essential tools like Office and CAD software, alongside a commitment to a single Long Term Support (LTS) distribution to avoid IT fragmentation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720053&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s... an admirable goal, but it pretty much remains to be seen if &amp;#39;France&amp;#39;[1] follows through. Previous attempts to &amp;#39;ditch Windows&amp;#39; have not ended that well. Munich in 2003, the entire Federal German government in 2009, Munich again in 2013, Munich again in 2021, and so on. Most common end-result: back to Windows. Breaking points are typically the lack of an &amp;#39;Office 2016&amp;#39; compatible suite, lack of &amp;#39;Adobe PDF&amp;#39; tooling, and a mishmash of legacy apps. The latter seems trivially addressable by a…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720020&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;The French government did not provide a specific timeline for the switchover, or which distributions it was considering. Do they realize they need to pick a LTS distro now? You can&amp;#39;t mix and match distros without having a massive IT and user retraining budgets.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47719851&quot; title=&quot;I’ve commented on this before but you’ll know France is serious when there are Linux ports of Solidworks and Catia. France has a real edge over American companies by being the dominant player in the CAD world,  it’s always surprised me that they nerfed that advantage by tying to an American operating system.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite improvements, many believe Linux still lacks the seamless hardware integration and robust security infrastructure necessary for large-scale government deployment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47721375&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been using linux as a daily driver since the start of the year. There&amp;#39;s still a long ways to go before things &amp;#39;just work&amp;#39;. It&amp;#39;s about equivalent to windows right now in terms of frustrations, it&amp;#39;s just that frustrations are more along the lines of &amp;#39;this is a bit wonky&amp;#39; instead of &amp;#39;this is malicious / was their intended behavior&amp;#39;. It&amp;#39;s gotten a LOT better, don&amp;#39;t get me wrong, but it&amp;#39;s still far off from what a typical user would need. I&amp;#39;d love to see either Valve or Nvidia really put in…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720766&quot; title=&quot;Desktop Linux&amp;#39;s security and antimalware solutions are not ready for government usage. This is a cyber attack waiting to happen if they go through with this. They should at least switch to ChromeOS if they want to use Linux.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.numerique.gouv.fr/sinformer/espace-presse/souverainete-numerique-reduction-dependances-extra-europeennes/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;France Launches Government Linux Desktop Plan as Windows Exit Begins&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (numerique.gouv.fr)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47716043&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;832 points · 423 comments · by embedding-shape&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The French government is accelerating its digital sovereignty strategy by transitioning state workstations from Windows to Linux and requiring all ministries to develop plans by autumn 2026 to reduce dependence on extra-European software, cloud services, and hardware. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.numerique.gouv.fr/sinformer/espace-presse/souverainete-numerique-reduction-dependances-extra-europeennes/&quot; title=&quot;Title: numerique.gouv.fr    URL Source: https://www.numerique.gouv.fr/sinformer/espace-presse/souverainete-numerique-reduction-dependances-extra-europeennes/    Markdown Content:  # numerique.gouv.fr    *   [Contenu](https://www.numerique.gouv.fr/sinformer/espace-presse/souverainete-numerique-reduction-dependances-extra-europeennes/#content)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;France’s move toward Linux is seen as a vital step for digital sovereignty and avoiding strategic dependency on U.S. technology &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47716191&quot; title=&quot;Yeah good on them, everyone needs to do this. It&amp;#39;s nuts Windows is still the go-to for anything these days despite everyone knowing what a parasitic, buggy mess it is. &amp;#39;Easy&amp;#39; shouldn&amp;#39;t be the excuse in this day and age. Big orgs and especially government entities should be hiring the people that know what they&amp;#39;re doing and get off that crummy platform.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47716218&quot; title=&quot;Being dependent on US tech feels the same as when we were dependent on Russian energy: strategically unwise and avoidable. We have alternatives, they just need work.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47716143&quot; title=&quot;France has been making good moves to achieve software independence from the US. It would be an even better move to allow those in Europe or indeed the rest of the world to also benefit.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While critics argue that Linux lacks the cohesive management tools of Windows, such as Active Directory and Group Policy, others suggest that government funding could bridge these gaps by developing open-source alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47716666&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s nuts Windows is still the go-to for anything these days despite everyone knowing what a parasitic Linux still doesn&amp;#39;t have anywhere near as nice and cohesive as Group Policy, Active Directory etc. Plus you can pay Microsoft to host it all for you on Azure.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47717058&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Linux still doesn&amp;#39;t have anywhere near as nice and cohesive as Group Policy, Active Directory etc. Isn&amp;#39;t it about time someone developed one? The foundations are there; you can imagine an organization deploying laptops with, say, Ansible, and not giving users root on them. LDAP sort of matches the old capabilities of AD, but not completely. There&amp;#39;s even a &amp;#39;SAMBA as fake domain controller&amp;#39; mode. Ironically what it needs is a product or service which organizations can pay to take the problem…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47716922&quot; title=&quot;Imagine what can happen if the French and other governments would start pouring all the money into developing that further in the open, rather than just giving it all to Microsoft instead?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Though Linux gaming has improved significantly for casual users, concerns remain regarding hardware compatibility for power users and the lack of European-made hardware to support the transition &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47717066&quot; title=&quot;All the comments about Linux gaming make me want to give my $0.02. I&amp;#39;ve been gaming on Linux, with no Windows installed anywhere, for around 6 years. In the first 3 years, it was a massive pain. Games like S.T.A.L.K.E.R. would consistently have issues with mouse input, weird acceleration, a lot of games wouldn&amp;#39;t run at all. This is NO LONGER the case at all. Things run very well out of the box. All games I want to play run very well and mostly the process is just &amp;#39;install -&amp;gt; play&amp;#39;. If a game…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47716255&quot; title=&quot;Like last time, I ask again: Which are the European made computers?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47716141&quot; title=&quot;That might work for government employees using webapps all day. But for power users it is unlikely to be friction free.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rowan441.github.io/1dchess/chess.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1D Chess&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (rowan441.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47719740&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;977 points · 171 comments · by burnt-resistor&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1D-Chess is a web-based adaptation of Martin Gardner’s 1980 chess variant that simplifies the game into a single dimension using only kings, knights, and rooks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rowan441.github.io/1dchess/chess.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: 1D-Chess    URL Source: https://rowan441.github.io/1dchess/chess.html    Published Time: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 02:51:44 GMT    Markdown Content:  # 1D-Chess    ![Image 1](https://rowan441.github.io/1dchess/assets/pieces/white-king.svg)![Image 2](https://rowan441.github.io/1dchess/assets/pieces/white-knight.svg)![Image 3](https://rowan441.github.io/1dchess/assets/pieces/white-rook.svg)![Image 4](https://rowan441.github.io/1dchess/assets/pieces/black-king.svg)![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the mechanics and strategies of 1D Chess, with users debating specific opening moves and the game&amp;#39;s tendency to end in stalemates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720604&quot; title=&quot;The first move is always: white rook takes black rook, then the only remaining move for black is to move the knight away, which results in checkmate.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720620&quot; title=&quot;If you play the game, you realise this ends up in stalemate.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Several commenters expressed confusion over the stalemate rule, leading to clarifications that a king is not in checkmate if it is trapped but not under active attack &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47721183&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not very good at chess, but I dont get why most things are considered a stalemate? I strategically remove all pieces of the enemy, leaving only the king against my rook/tower whatever its called, the king has nowhere to run. In my eyes it&amp;#39;s a checkmate. The game just calls it a stalemate. Would be a stalemate if I couldn&amp;#39;t do anything, but I can kill the enemy king.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47721552&quot; title=&quot;I don’t know why this is stalemate: N4 N5, N6 K7, R5.  Wouldn’t rook have the king in checkmate?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47721296&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a stalemate because while the king can&amp;#39;t move, he isn&amp;#39;t under active attack. There is nowhere he can legally move, but he&amp;#39;s safe where he&amp;#39;s at.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The thread also features comparisons to other abstract games, such as &amp;#34;Mind Chess&amp;#34;—a psychological game of chicken—and Backgammon, which is described as a popular real-world 1D game &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47721597&quot; title=&quot;If you enjoyed this, you might like Mind Chess, which can be played without a board and pieces [1]: Consider Mind Chess. Two players face each other. One says &amp;#39;Check.&amp;#39; The other says &amp;#39;Check.&amp;#39; The first says &amp;#39;Check.&amp;#39; This continues until one of them says, instead, &amp;#39;Checkmate.&amp;#39; That player wins -- superficially. In fact, the challenge is to put off checkmate for as long as possible, while still winning. This may be better stated: you truly win Mind Chess if you call &amp;#39;Checkmate&amp;#39; just before your…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720357&quot; title=&quot;This is really nice. Incidentally, there is an actual 1D game that is one of the most popular games on the planet: Backgammon.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.gitbutler.com/series-a&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;We&amp;#39;ve raised $17M to build what comes after Git&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.gitbutler.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47712656&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;335 points · &lt;strong&gt;740 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by ellieh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GitButler has raised $17 million in Series A funding led by a16z to develop a modern version control infrastructure designed for multitasking, team collaboration, and AI-integrated workflows. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.gitbutler.com/series-a&quot; title=&quot;Title: We’ve raised $17M to build what comes after Git    URL Source: https://blog.gitbutler.com/series-a    Published Time: 2026-04-08T16:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  # We’ve raised $17M to build what comes after Git | Butler&amp;#39;s Log    [](https://gitbutler.com/)    [Butler&amp;#39;s Log](https://blog.gitbutler.com/)[RSS](https://blog.gitbutler.com/rss)    *   [Downloads](https://gitbutler.com/downloads)  *   [Docs](https://docs.gitbutler.com/)  *   [Community](https://discord.com/invite/MmFkmaJ42D)  *   [Source…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion is heavily skeptical of the need for a Git replacement, with many users arguing that Git remains a highly effective tool and that its perceived flaws are already being addressed by existing alternatives like Jujutsu &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47713454&quot; title=&quot;I feel like I really need to learn how to raise money. For $17M, one could probably build a vacuum robot prototype that’ll also clean up all of the kids toys and sort LEGO bricks by colour and size. Parents worldwide would love it. But instead, we get a replacement for Git. And I didn’t even bother to click the link because I’m fine with how Git works. On the list of pain points in my life, “what comes after Git” has roughly the same priority as “try out a more exciting shower gel”. But did you…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47713460&quot; title=&quot;I recently switched to Jujutsu (jj) and it made me realize that “what comes after Git” might already exist. It turns out the snapshot model is a perfect fit for AI-assisted development. I can iterate freely without thinking about commits or worrying about saving known-good versions. You can just mess around and make it presentable later, which Git never really let you do nicely. Plus there’s essentially zero learning curve, since all the models know how to use JJ really well.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47719696&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The old model assumed one person, one branch, one terminal, one linear flow. Not only has the problem not been solved well for that old model, it’s now only been compounded with our new AI tools. A bit of a strange thing to say in my book. Git isn&amp;#39;t SVN and I think these problems are already solved with git. I agree that the interface is not always very intuitive but Git has the infrastructure which is very much focused on supporting alternatives to &amp;#39;one person, one branch, one terminal, one…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters attribute the $17M funding less to a revolutionary idea and more to the &amp;#34;clique&amp;#34; nature of VC culture and the founder&amp;#39;s previous success with GitHub &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47713641&quot; title=&quot;A lot of people seem confused about how they raised the money, but it’s actually a pretty easy VC pitch. - It’s from one of GitHub’s cofounders. - GitHub had a $7.5B exit. - And the story is: AI is completely changing how software gets built, with plenty of proof points already showing up in the billions in revenue being made from things like Claude Code, Cusor, Codex, etc. So the pitch is basically: back the team that can build the universal infrastructure for AI and agentic coding.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47714806&quot; title=&quot;Money is not given to good ideas (though, it doesn’t hurt). Money is given to friends . If you look at how VC (or really any network) funding circulates, it’s just people who are allowed to enter that circle and money just flows between them constantly. On one hand, you have trusted people who you are willing to give money, on the other hand, this inherently creates a clique. It reminds me how the Bohemian Club’s slogan, “Weaving Spiders Come Not Here” is a bit farcical given that it is…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant concern regarding the commercialization of critical developer infrastructure, as users prefer community-driven open-source tools over those designed to extract value for investors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47714653&quot; title=&quot;I personally feel that: 1) Git is fine 2) I would not want to replace critical open source tooling with something backed by investor capital from its inception. Sure, it will be “open source “, but with people throwing money behind it, there’s a plan to extract value from the user base from day one. I’m tired of being “the product”. Critical open source tooltips by should spring from the community, not from corporate sponsorship.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47713351&quot; title=&quot;Why does it take $17m to beat Git? How will you ever get the network effects needed to get sustained users with a commercial tool? Given Git was created because BitKeeper, a commercial tool, pulled their permission for kernel developers to use their tool aren’t we ignoring a lesson there?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://9to5mac.com/2026/04/09/fbi-used-iphone-notification-data-to-retrieve-deleted-signal-messages/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;FBI used iPhone notification data to retrieve deleted Signal messages&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (9to5mac.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47716490&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;626 points · 305 comments · by 01-_-&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FBI recovered deleted Signal messages from an iPhone by extracting incoming message content stored in the device’s internal notification database. This was possible because the user had not enabled Signal&amp;#39;s setting to hide message previews, allowing the data to remain in memory even after the app was uninstalled. &lt;a href=&quot;https://9to5mac.com/2026/04/09/fbi-used-iphone-notification-data-to-retrieve-deleted-signal-messages/&quot; title=&quot;FBI used iPhone notification data to retrieve deleted Signal messages - 9to5Mac    The FBI was able to recover deleted Signal messages from an iPhone by extracting data stored in the device’s notification database.    [Skip to main content](#main)    Toggle main menu    [9to5Mac Logo Go to the 9to5Mac home page](https://9to5mac.com/)     Switch site    * [9to5Toys](https://9to5toys.com)  * [9to5Google Logo9to5Google](https://9to5google.com)  * [Electrek](https://electrek.co)  * [Drone DJ…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FBI&amp;#39;s ability to retrieve deleted Signal messages stems from the fact that both iOS and Android sync notification content to Apple and Google servers by default, even if on-screen previews are disabled &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47717768&quot; title=&quot;Wait so if I do iOS setting notifications &amp;gt; never show previews it’s still caching them in the background? Unencrypted?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47717771&quot; title=&quot;Yes. And technically, from a privacy perspective, it&amp;#39;s even worse than that. What&amp;#39;s additionally happening is they&amp;#39;re still &amp;#39;syncing&amp;#39; back to Apple servers via APNS (and to Alphabet servers via Firebase on Android)—even with notifications completely disabled , that&amp;#39;s correct. If the app generates them, the OS receives them. That&amp;#39;s why the Signal app offers this setting.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Users and developers emphasize that to prevent this, one must change the setting within the Signal app itself—not just the OS settings—to &amp;#34;No Name or Content&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47716967&quot; title=&quot;Settings &amp;gt; Notifications &amp;gt; Notification Content &amp;gt; Show: &amp;#39;Name Only&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;No Name or Content&amp;#39; I&amp;#39;ve had this enabled to prevent sensitive messages from appearing in full whilst showing someone something on my phone, but I guess this is an added benefit as well.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47717237&quot; title=&quot;Just to clarify, this is within the Signal app settings—not the OS (iOS or Android) system settings. Critical distinction, as merely changing OS notification settings will simply prevent notification content from being displayed on-screen.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users criticize the app for &amp;#34;nagging&amp;#34; them to enable notifications to reduce support tickets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47718981&quot; title=&quot;Just curious, how come at least once a month signal bugs me to turn on notifications? I said no for a reason, every single time - why does it keep asking? Not implying anything evil but it feels a bit weird esp after this.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47719026&quot; title=&quot;Signal developer here. It&amp;#39;s just because notification reliability is always a top support complaint, and a lot of people turn off notifications and don&amp;#39;t realize they&amp;#39;ve done so. Admittedly, once a month is likely too aggressive.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47719077&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; why does it keep asking? Why does any software keep asking you to do things you explicitly told them you don&amp;#39;t want to do? Because it&amp;#39;s in the software developer&amp;#39;s best interest to get you to do them, not yours. We&amp;#39;ve gotten way past the point in software where we no longer expect the software to serve the user&amp;#39;s interest and solve the user&amp;#39;s problems. Now, the expectation is that the user gets nagged and coerced into serving the software&amp;#39;s interest and solving the developers&amp;#39; problems. EDIT:…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others express frustration that the system&amp;#39;s default behavior undermines the core promise of end-to-end encryption and forward secrecy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720347&quot; title=&quot;Putting on my user hat... &amp;#39;OK. Signal has forward secrecy. So messages are gone after I receive them. Great!&amp;#39; Oh, you didn&amp;#39;t turn on disappearing messages? Oh, right, then forensic tools like Cellebrite can get them. You have to turn on disappearing messages. The default is off. Oh, you did turn on disappearing messages? We send the messages in notifications. So the OS can keep them. Turns out Apple was doing that. There is an option you can turn on to prevent that. It is off by default. &amp;#39;I&amp;#39;ll…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47718500&quot; title=&quot;Wait... why does Signal need to send notification content to Firebase to trigger a push notification on device? I would instead expect that Signal would send a push to my Android saying nothing more than &amp;#39;wake up, you&amp;#39;ve got a message in convo XYZ&amp;#39;, then the app would take over and handle the rest of it locally. I also didn&amp;#39;t realize that Android stores message history even after I&amp;#39;ve replied or swiped them away. That&amp;#39;s nuts - why!?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI assistance when contributing to the Linux kernel&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47721953&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;510 points · 406 comments · by hmokiguess&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux kernel project has established guidelines for AI-assisted contributions, requiring human developers to review all code, take legal responsibility via Signed-off-by tags, and provide proper attribution using a new &amp;#34;Assisted-by&amp;#34; tag. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst&quot; title=&quot;linux/Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst at master · torvalds/linux    Linux kernel source tree. Contribute to torvalds/linux development by creating an account on GitHub.    [Skip to content](#start-of-content)    ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [Sign in](/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux%2Fblob%2Fmaster%2FDocumentation%2Fprocess%2Fcoding-assistants.rst)    Appearance settings    * Platform      + AI CODE CREATION      - [GitHub CopilotWrite better code with…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux kernel&amp;#39;s policy on AI is viewed by many as a pragmatic, &amp;#34;common-sense&amp;#34; approach that places full legal and technical responsibility on the human contributor &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47722942&quot; title=&quot;Basically the rules are that you can use AI, but you take full responsibility for your commits and code must satisfy the license. That&amp;#39;s... refreshingly normal? Surely something most people acting in good faith can get behind.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47723289&quot; title=&quot;But the responsible party is still the human who added the code. Not the tool that helped do so.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47722935&quot; title=&quot;Glad to see the common-sense rule that only humans can be held accountable for code generated by AI agents.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this is a refreshingly normal standard for good-faith actors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47722942&quot; title=&quot;Basically the rules are that you can use AI, but you take full responsibility for your commits and code must satisfy the license. That&amp;#39;s... refreshingly normal? Surely something most people acting in good faith can get behind.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47723207&quot; title=&quot;Literally, insane that some projects blanket-ban AI despite being the human responsibility in the end.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, critics contend it is impossible for a human to guarantee that AI-generated code does not contain infringing snippets from its training data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47723204&quot; title=&quot;How could you do that though? You can’t guarantee that there aren’t chunks of copied code that infringes.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47723343&quot; title=&quot;In a court case the responsibility party very well could be the Linux foundation because this is a foreseeable consequence of allowing AI contributions. There’s no reasonable way for a human to make such a guarantee while using AI generated code.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. This debate centers on whether responsibility is a social construct agreed upon by the community &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47723503&quot; title=&quot;It’s not about the mechanism: responsibility is a social construct, it works the way people say that it works. If we all agree that a human can agree to bear the responsibility for AI outputs, and face any consequences resulting from those outputs, then that’s the whole shebang.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt; or a looming legal liability for the Linux Foundation if AI output is eventually ruled to violate the GPL &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47723047&quot; title=&quot;But then if AI output is not under GNU General Public License, how can it become so just because a Linux-developer adds it to the code-base?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47723875&quot; title=&quot;AIs are not human and therefore their output is a human authored contribution and only human authored things are covered by copyright. The work might hypothetically infringe on other people&amp;#39;s copyright. But such an infringement does not happen until a human decides to create and distribute a work that somehow integrates that generated code or text. The solution documented here seems very pragmatic. You as a contributor simply state that you are making the contribution and that you are not…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47723343&quot; title=&quot;In a court case the responsibility party very well could be the Linux foundation because this is a foreseeable consequence of allowing AI contributions. There’s no reasonable way for a human to make such a guarantee while using AI generated code.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://david.coffee/i-still-prefer-mcp-over-skills/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I still prefer MCP over skills&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (david.coffee)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47712718&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;456 points · 368 comments · by gmays&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;David Mohl argues that the Model Context Protocol (MCP) is a superior architectural choice for AI service integration compared to &amp;#34;Skills,&amp;#34; which often rely on cumbersome CLI installations and manual secret management rather than seamless, standardized API abstractions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://david.coffee/i-still-prefer-mcp-over-skills/&quot; title=&quot;Title: I Still Prefer MCP Over Skills    URL Source: https://david.coffee/i-still-prefer-mcp-over-skills/    Published Time: 2026-04-02T10:00:00+09:00    Markdown Content:  # I Still Prefer MCP Over Skills | David Mohl    [![Image 1](https://david.coffee/etc/dm.png)Home](https://david.coffee/ &amp;#39;Home (Alt + H)&amp;#39;)    *   [about](https://david.coffee/about/ &amp;#39;about&amp;#39;)  *   [projects+apps](https://david.coffee/projects/ &amp;#39;projects+apps&amp;#39;)  *   [bluesky](https://bsky.app/profile/david.d.sh &amp;#39;bluesky&amp;#39;)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate centers on whether the Model Context Protocol (MCP) is a necessary standard or an over-engineered layer that adds friction compared to direct CLI or API usage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47715000&quot; title=&quot;Don&amp;#39;t focus on what you prefer: it does not matter. Focus on what tool the LLM requires to do its work in the best way. MCP adds friction, imagine doing yourself the work using the average MCP server. However, skills alone are not sufficient if you want, for instance, creating the ability for LLMs to instrument a complicated system. Work in two steps: 1. Ask the LLM to build a tool, under your guide and specification, in order do a specific task. For instance, if you are working with embedded…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47715781&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; MCP is the absolute best and most effective way to integrate external tools into your agent sessions Nope. The best way to interact with an external service is an api. It was the best way before, and its the best way now. MCP doesn&amp;#39;t scale and it has a bloated unnecessarily complicated spec. Some MCP servers are good; but in general a new bad way of interacting with external services, is not the best way of doing it, and the assertion that it is in general , best, is what I refer to as “works…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents argue that MCP is the superior solution for persistent, cross-session tool integration and organizational scale where environment control is limited &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47715475&quot; title=&quot;I feel like the MCP conversation conflates too many things and everyone has strong assumptions that aren&amp;#39;t always correct. The fundamental issue is between one-off vs. persistent access across sessions: - If you need to interact with a local app in a one-off session, then use CLI. - If you need to interact with an online service in a one-off session, then use their API. - If you need to interact with a local app in a persistent manner, and if that app provides an MCP server, use it. - If you…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47715842&quot; title=&quot;Let&amp;#39;s say I made a calendar app that stores appointments for you. It&amp;#39;s local, installed on your system, and the data is stored in some file in ~/.calendarapp. Now let&amp;#39;s say you want all your Claude Code sessions to use this calendar app so that you can always say something like &amp;#39;ah yes, do I have availability on Saturday for this meeting?&amp;#39; and the AI will look at the schedule to find out. What&amp;#39;s the best way to create this persistent connection to the calendar app? I think it&amp;#39;s obviously an MCP…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47715032&quot; title=&quot;This argument always sounds like two crowds shouting past each other. Are you a solo developer, are you fully in control of your environment, are you focused on productivity and extremely tight feedback loops, do you have a high tolerance for risk: you should probably use CLIs. MCPs will just irritate you. Are you trying to work together with multiple people at organizational scale and alignment is a problem; are you working in a range of environments which need controls and management, do you…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, critics contend that agents should simply use existing CLI tools and &amp;#34;skill&amp;#34; files to avoid context bloat and the complexity of maintaining separate servers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47715000&quot; title=&quot;Don&amp;#39;t focus on what you prefer: it does not matter. Focus on what tool the LLM requires to do its work in the best way. MCP adds friction, imagine doing yourself the work using the average MCP server. However, skills alone are not sufficient if you want, for instance, creating the ability for LLMs to instrument a complicated system. Work in two steps: 1. Ask the LLM to build a tool, under your guide and specification, in order do a specific task. For instance, if you are working with embedded…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47713089&quot; title=&quot;I could not agree any less with the author. I don’t want APIs, I want agents to use the same CLI tooling I already use that is locally available. If my agents are using CLI tooling anyways there is no need to add an extra layer via MCP. I don’t want remote MCP calls, I don’t even want remote models but that’s cost prohibitive. If I need to call an API, a skill with existing CLI tooling is more than capable.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47715589&quot; title=&quot;My main complaint with mcp is that it doesn&amp;#39;t compose well with other tools or code. Like if I want to pull 1000 jira tickets and do some custom analysis I can do that with cli or api just fine, but not mcp.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.wired.com/story/openai-backs-bill-exempt-ai-firms-model-harm-lawsuits/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OpenAI backs Illinois bill that would limit when AI labs can be held liable&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (wired.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47717587&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;445 points · 323 comments · by smurda&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI is supporting an Illinois bill that would protect AI developers from liability for harmful content generated by their models, provided the companies implement reasonable safeguards and do not intentionally encourage the misuse. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.wired.com/story/openai-backs-bill-exempt-ai-firms-model-harm-lawsuits/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.md&amp;amp;#x2F;WzwBY&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.md&amp;amp;#x2F;WzwBY&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on an Illinois bill that would grant AI developers immunity from &amp;#34;critical harm&amp;#34; liability—defined as mass casualties or billion-dollar damages—provided they publish safety protocols and transparency reports &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47718170&quot; title=&quot;Quoting the original bill [0]: &amp;gt; &amp;#39;Critical harm&amp;#39; means the death or serious injury of 100  or more people or at least $1,000,000,000 of damages to rights  in property caused or materially enabled by a frontier model,  through either:  (1) the creation or use of a chemical, biological,  radiological, or nuclear weapon; or  (2) engaging in conduct that:  (A) acts with no meaningful human intervention;  and  (B) would, if committed by a human, constitute a  criminal offense that requires intent,…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue this allows companies to capture all the profit while offloading the blame for catastrophic failures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47717852&quot; title=&quot;Take all of the data, take all of the credit, take all of the money, and none of the blame. That would be a better mission statement for OpenAI at this point.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47717838&quot; title=&quot;So they did the math and worked out it&amp;#39;s cheaper and easier to lobby the government instead of working to make their product safe. And these are the people that a lot programmers want to give the keys to the kingdom. Idiocracy really is in full effect.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, drawing parallels to legislation that protects pesticide companies from health-related lawsuits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47719016&quot; title=&quot;As an Iowan, this reminds me a lot of the bill that&amp;#39;s been pushed through my state&amp;#39;s senate twice now (as recently as last year), which would prevent Iowans from filing lawsuits against pesticide and herbicide companies if those companies follow the EPA&amp;#39;s labeling guidelines. The bill passed the senate both times, only stopped because the house declined to take it up. For context, Iowa has the fastest growing rate of new cancer diagnoses in the country, and the second highest overall cancer…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While one user demonstrated that models can still be manipulated into providing detailed instructions for creating neurotoxic agents &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47718018&quot; title=&quot;I have made both GPT 5.4 and Opus 4.6 produce me content on creating neurotoxic agents from items you can get at most everyday stores. It struggled to suggest how to source   phosphorus, but eventually lead me to some ebay listings that sell phosphorus elemental &amp;#39;decorations&amp;#39; and also lead me towards real!! blackmarket codewords for sourcing such materials. It coached me how to: stay safe, what materials I need, how to stay under the radar and the entire chemical process backed by academic…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that such dangerous information has long been accessible via search engines and internet forums, suggesting the &amp;#34;friction&amp;#34; of obtaining it is the only thing that has changed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47718142&quot; title=&quot;While scary, information like this has been pretty accessible for 20-30 years now. In the wild west days of the early internet, there were whole forums devoted to &amp;#39;stuff the government doesn&amp;#39;t want you to know&amp;#39; (Temple Of The Screaming Electron, anyone?). I suppose the friction is scariest part, every year the IQ required to end the world drops by a point, but motivated and mildly intelligent people have been able to get this info for a long time now. Execution though has still steadily…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47718118&quot; title=&quot;Wasnt this as accessible pre AI with just Google search too?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47718340&quot; title=&quot;you can already gather the same information by searching online. Do you want to know how to kill yourself?   forums are for nerds. Here is wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_methods#List Do you want to make a bomb?  the first thing that came to my mind is a pressure cooker (due to news coverage). Searching &amp;#39;bomb with pressure cooker&amp;#39; yields a wikipedia article, skimming it randomly my eyes read &amp;#39;Step-by-step instructions for making pressure cooker bombs were published in an article…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jack.cab/blog/every-firefox-extension&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Installing every* Firefox extension&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jack.cab)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47724118&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;671 points · 80 comments · by RohanAdwankar&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer successfully installed 84,194 Firefox extensions—99.94% of the available library—into a single browser profile. The experiment revealed significant performance bottlenecks, including a six-hour load time for the addons menu and 30GB of RAM usage, while uncovering various phishing schemes, SEO spam, and &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; extensions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jack.cab/blog/every-firefox-extension&quot; title=&quot;Title: Installing every* Firefox extension    URL Source: https://jack.cab/blog/every-firefox-extension    Markdown Content:  # Installing every* Firefox extension  [![Image 1](blob:http://localhost/415605915108f012b8a7105fff32d34a)Jack.cab](https://jack.cab/)![Image 2: May&amp;#39;s Firefox open on Attempt 11](https://jack.cab/_astro/launch.fuIAiunJ_ZtRu8u.png)  # Installing every* Firefox extension    Oh, you use Firefox? Name every extension.    [Published…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The experiment of installing over 84,000 Firefox extensions highlighted a performance bottleneck where the browser&amp;#39;s `extensions.json` file is rewritten in full every 20ms, leading some to argue for a return to database-driven storage while others defended the simplicity of JSON for typical use cases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47725431&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I did some research to find why this took so long. 13 years ago, extensions.json used to be extensions.sqlite. Nowadays, extensions.json is serialized and rewritten in full on every write debounced to 20 ms, which works fine for 15 extensions but not 84,194. Occasionally, databases are useful. ;)&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47725569&quot; title=&quot;This is probably a good example of the opposite. It would be a mistake to design for the fleetingly rare case. If you’re dealing with a handful of extensions, a json file that’s rewritten is fine.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47726058&quot; title=&quot;But the software already has multiple database systems built in. There&amp;#39;s not exactly overhead to use what plumbing is already there, instead of writing to disk.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The resulting browser environment was described as a chaotic mess of popups and sound effects, drawing comparisons to how inexperienced users inadvertently clutter their systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47724814&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m laughing so hard at the video, I imagine this is what browsing the web is like for the elderly that barely know how to use a computer. Can someone do this in Chrome?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47725294&quot; title=&quot;My favorite part was the metal pipe sound effect. Wish the author investigated which extension does that.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47726004&quot; title=&quot;If you turn loose a completely untrained person to click yes/accept/download/OK/I agree on every type of user interface popup, particularly a person who has no ability to distinguish between a user interface question presented by the operating system itself and something inside of a browser window, that&amp;#39;s what you&amp;#39;ll get...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Notably, the author discovered and neutralized a malicious extension that used a NocoDB spreadsheet to manage phishing URLs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47725536&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;In terms of implementation, the most interesting one is “Іron Wаllеt” (the I, a, and e are Cyrillic). Three seconds after install, it fetches the phishing page’s URL from the first record of a NocoDB spreadsheet and opens it [...] The API key had write access, so I wiped the spreadsheet.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2026-April/009561.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;WireGuard makes new Windows release following Microsoft signing resolution&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lists.zx2c4.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47719942&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;544 points · 164 comments · by zx2c4&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WireGuard has issued a new Windows release after resolving a driver signing issue with Microsoft that had previously impacted the software&amp;#39;s distribution. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2026-April/009561.html&quot; title=&quot;Recent and related: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Microsoft terminated the account VeraCrypt used to sign Windows drivers&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47686549&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47686549&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The WireGuard project has resumed Windows releases after Microsoft resolved a signing account suspension that also affected other open-source projects like VeraCrypt and LibreOffice &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720203&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The comments that followed were a bit off the rails. There&amp;#39;s no conspiracy here from Microsoft. But the Internet discussion wound up catching the attention of Microsoft, and a day later, the account was unblocked, and all was well. I think this is just a case of bureaucratic processes getting a bit out of hand, which Microsoft was able to easily remedy. I don&amp;#39;t think there&amp;#39;s been any malice or conspiracy or anything weird. it was a bit crazy how quickly people got conspiracy-minded about it.…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720228&quot; title=&quot;As I mentioned in the mailing list post, the Microsoft paperwork shuffling matter got dealt with rather quickly, following all the attention the HN thread from the other day got. And now we&amp;#39;re finally out with an update! NT programming is a lot of fun, though this release was quite challenging, because of all of the toolchain updates. On the plus side, we got to remove pre-Win10 support -- https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2026-March/00954... . But did you know that Microsoft removed…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720471&quot; title=&quot;LibreOffice, VeraCrypt, WireGuard. 2 questions: Whats next? Is that a pattern?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While Microsoft attributed the issue to a lack of verification for the Windows Hardware Program, some users questioned why pure software drivers are subject to hardware-specific gatekeeping &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47721466&quot; title=&quot;Microsoft are saying it&amp;#39;s because those accounts didn&amp;#39;t undergo verification for the Windows Hardware Program https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/09/microsoft_dev_account...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47724324&quot; title=&quot;I understand it&amp;#39;s because it&amp;#39;s a device driver, but why should a pure software publisher which has no hardware product of any sort be required to go through a &amp;#39;hardware program&amp;#39; gatekeeper of what binaries a person can choose to install and run on their own computer?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. A heated debate emerged over whether the lockout was a result of &amp;#34;bureaucratic incompetence&amp;#34; or a form of systemic malice, with some arguing that creating automated systems without human recourse is inherently malicious &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720203&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The comments that followed were a bit off the rails. There&amp;#39;s no conspiracy here from Microsoft. But the Internet discussion wound up catching the attention of Microsoft, and a day later, the account was unblocked, and all was well. I think this is just a case of bureaucratic processes getting a bit out of hand, which Microsoft was able to easily remedy. I don&amp;#39;t think there&amp;#39;s been any malice or conspiracy or anything weird. it was a bit crazy how quickly people got conspiracy-minded about it.…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720235&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; incompetence is always more likely than malice. &amp;#39;Incompetence&amp;#39; of this degree is malice . It is actively malicious to create a system that automatically locks people out of their accounts with absolutely no possibility for human review or recourse short of getting traction in the media. &amp;#39;No sir, I didn&amp;#39;t grind those orphans up. It was this orphan grinding machine I made that did it, teehee!&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720252&quot; title=&quot;i am positive that you understand the spirit of what that saying means. incompetence is always more likely than [intentional, directed] malice. microsoft employees did not deliberately attack the wireguard project with a goal of taking it down for whatever grand scheme people&amp;#39;s hatred cooks up. if you have evidence that microsoft did this deliberately to ruin the wireguard project, please forward it along to jason (the wireguard maintainer) and several news outlets.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720555&quot; title=&quot;Where possible I recommend not caring because figuring out whether malice was present is difficult and you can likely address a problem without needing to be sure. For example by creating working processes which never end up &amp;#39;accidentally&amp;#39; causing awful outcomes. This is sometimes more expensive, but we should ensure that the resulting lack of goodwill if you don&amp;#39;t is unaffordable. Worst case there is malice and you&amp;#39;ve now made it more difficult to hide the malice so you&amp;#39;ve at least made things…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the administrative hurdles, the maintainer noted that the update includes significant technical changes, such as dropping pre-Windows 10 support and navigating the removal of x86 driver compilation in the latest SDK &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720228&quot; title=&quot;As I mentioned in the mailing list post, the Microsoft paperwork shuffling matter got dealt with rather quickly, following all the attention the HN thread from the other day got. And now we&amp;#39;re finally out with an update! NT programming is a lot of fun, though this release was quite challenging, because of all of the toolchain updates. On the plus side, we got to remove pre-Win10 support -- https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2026-March/00954... . But did you know that Microsoft removed…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cr71lkzv49po&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chimpanzees in Uganda locked in eight-year &amp;#39;civil war&amp;#39;, say researchers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47722333&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;432 points · 273 comments · by neversaydie&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Researchers have documented an eight-year &amp;#34;civil war&amp;#34; among the world&amp;#39;s largest known wild chimpanzee group in Uganda, resulting in at least 24 recorded killings since the community split into two hostile factions in 2018. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cr71lkzv49po&quot; title=&quot;Title: Chimpanzees in Uganda locked in vicious &amp;#39;civil war&amp;#39;, say researchers    URL Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cr71lkzv49po    Published Time: 2026-04-10T16:52:55.698Z    Markdown Content:  # Chimpanzees in Uganda locked in vicious &amp;#39;civil war&amp;#39;, say researchers    [Skip to content](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cr71lkzv49po#bbc-main)    [Watch Live](https://www.bbc.com/watch-live-news/)    [](https://www.bbc.com/)    *   [Home](https://www.bbc.com/)   *   [News](https://www.bbc.com/news)   *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The chimpanzee &amp;#34;civil war&amp;#34; sparked debate over whether &amp;#34;coalitionary killing&amp;#34; is an evolved trait selected for when homicide grants a genetic or resource advantage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47723365&quot; title=&quot;The primatologist Richard Wrangam once advanced the theory that tribe vs. tribe conspecific homicides - what he called coalitionary killing - are an evolved trait that was selected for in primates by some kind of pro-homicide selection pressures in the ancestral environment (where homicide reliably grants an advantage to the expected relative gene frequency of the perpetrator&amp;#39;s genes). I haven&amp;#39;t kept up with biology for years and don&amp;#39;t know what the current consensus on the topic is but it&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47723429&quot; title=&quot;It seems obvious to me - it&amp;#39;s the combination of two ideas: 1.  When competing for resources, killing your neighbour frees up resources, which you can take.   Most species of animal and even plants do this to some extent. 2.  By collaborating in a group, you can achieve more than individuals acting alone.   This is the idea behind teams,  companies, countries, etc. Combine the two ideas, and you get war.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that murder is a form of &amp;#34;social cheating&amp;#34; that species must repeatedly learn to deconflict, others contend that resource competition and blood feuds are primal drivers of conflict that predate human constructs like religion or politics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47723966&quot; title=&quot;Yes, but war is worse for all parties generally. Lions murdering prey to eat is a stable equilibrium. Primates fighting each other is not. Murdering for acquisition of a resource is short term advantage. We are strongly, strongly evolutionary oriented away from &amp;#39;murder&amp;#39; - it&amp;#39;s the original sin. It&amp;#39;s not something we even argue over. Murder = Bad. No disagreement across cultures. Murder = social cheating. No disagreement there either. Or put another way - the &amp;#39;self&amp;#39; can gain advantage with…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47723562&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If chimpanzees - one of the species closest to humans genetically - could do so without human constructs of religion, ethnicity and political beliefs, then &amp;#39;relational dynamics may play a larger causal role in human conflict than often assumed&amp;#39;, they added. That&amp;#39;s a weird thing to say. Studies of primitive tribes showed decades ago that they only seem to fight each other for a handful of reasons. Religion, ethnicity and political beliefs aren&amp;#39;t among them. Fighting over resources, women and…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters also noted that the conflict followed a destabilizing respiratory epidemic, drawing parallels to human societal shifts after major health crises &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47722837&quot; title=&quot;Here is the paper: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adz4944 - it&amp;#39;s interesting. I noticed there was a respiratory epidemic that killed 25 chimps naturally quickly, one would imagine that would have quite a societal destabilizing impact?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47724519&quot; title=&quot;So wait - after a respiratory virus, let&amp;#39;s call it SARS-C, that killed &amp;gt; 10% (25/200 = 12.5%) of their population, they split into two major groups that are now at each other&amp;#39;s throats, when before they had a generally-ok alliance / relationship? Where have I seen this before.. Think.. Think..&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://eclecticlight.co/2026/04/10/why-you-cant-trust-privacy-security/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;You can&amp;#39;t trust macOS Privacy and Security settings&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (eclecticlight.co)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47719602&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;504 points · 169 comments · by zdw&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MacOS Privacy &amp;amp; Security settings can be misleading because apps can retain permanent access to protected folders through user intent, such as using an Open Panel, even if access is later disabled or not listed in the system settings. &lt;a href=&quot;https://eclecticlight.co/2026/04/10/why-you-cant-trust-privacy-security/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Why you can’t trust Privacy &amp;amp; Security    URL Source: https://eclecticlight.co/2026/04/10/why-you-cant-trust-privacy-security/    Published Time: 2026-04-10T06:30:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Why you can’t trust Privacy &amp;amp; Security – The Eclectic Light Company    [Skip to content](https://eclecticlight.co/2026/04/10/why-you-cant-trust-privacy-security/#content)    [![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The macOS privacy model is criticized for a discrepancy where apps retain access to protected folders even after permissions are explicitly disabled in System Settings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720300&quot; title=&quot;Yes, you need to read more carefully. In particular: “8. Confirm that Documents access for Insent is still disabled in Files &amp;amp; Folders. “9. Whatever you do now, the app retains full access to Documents, no matter what is shown or set in Files &amp;amp; Folders.” […] “Access restrictions shown in Privacy &amp;amp; Security settings, specifically those to protected locations in Files &amp;amp; Folders, aren’t an accurate or trustworthy reflection of those that are actually applied. It’s possible for an app to have…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720538&quot; title=&quot;The problem is that this given permission doesn’t show in Files &amp;amp; Folders, and after turning it on and off there it still persists. The only way to revoke it is using some CLI command and restart the computer.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this is a reasonable trade-off because the app gains &amp;#34;implicit consent&amp;#34; when a user manually selects a folder via a native file picker &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720492&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;6. Click on Open from folder and select your Documents folder there. Confirm that works as expected and displays the name and contents of one of the text files in Documents.&amp;#39; It&amp;#39;s because in step 6 the user explicitly selected the Documents folder. The app can access the Documents folder because the user chose that directory in the native file browse dialog during the same run of the app. IMO that&amp;#39;s a reasonable trade-off.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720591&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s not what&amp;#39;s happening here.   Forget about the first 5 steps. If you install the app and start from step 6, the behaviour will be the same. If the user chooses the Documents folder in the browse window in an app, the app can use the contents of the Documents folder without the need for that permission in the Settings page. The Privacy settings applies only to access to the Documents folder without the user interaction.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720777&quot; title=&quot;You don&amp;#39;t need that permission if the user gives their implicit consent by selecting the Documents directory in the browse window. That&amp;#39;s why most apps don&amp;#39;t even show up in the Privacy Settings at all. Most apps don&amp;#39;t need that, because they don&amp;#39;t try to access that directory on their own. They only do it when the user selects the directory. I guess the improvement can be to show the implicit consent in the privacy settings page as well, and have a way to revoke it.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend it is misleading that these persistent permissions are not reflected in the UI or easily revocable without using terminal commands &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720667&quot; title=&quot;The point is that (a) it’s misleading that the app has access to the folder while the settings claim that it doesn’t, and (b) there is no reasonable way for the user to revoke the implicitly given permission.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720592&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s the beauty of using a GUI-first operating system! &amp;gt; only way you can protect your Documents folder from access by Insent is to run the following command in Terminal: tccutil reset All co.eclecticlight.Insent then restart your Mac&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. This complexity has led to accusations of &amp;#34;permission fatigue&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;enforced sandboxing&amp;#34; that frustrates power users while failing to provide a transparent security state &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720116&quot; title=&quot;The problem with Mac’s sandbox system is that it’s giving me some PTSD of Windows UAC. It’s inventing a solution to a problem that might exist in small doses, but instead gives users permission fatigue. I personally think the traditional *nix model has served us quite well, and elective sandboxing using containers (à la Docker and so on) is quite good. The Mac sandbox model is probably ok for most normal users, but for power users is infuriating at times. Multiple restarts of Mac and various…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720088&quot; title=&quot;It seems that author basically found a 0day and published it. It&amp;#39;s for sure better than selling it on the dark web but maybe it&amp;#39;s better first tell it to Apple?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.construction-physics.com/p/helium-is-hard-to-replace&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Helium is hard to replace&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (construction-physics.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47719274&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;370 points · 267 comments · by JumpCrisscross&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has triggered a global helium shortage and price spikes, threatening critical industries like semiconductors and healthcare that rely on the element&amp;#39;s unique, irreplaceable cooling and inert properties. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.construction-physics.com/p/helium-is-hard-to-replace&quot; title=&quot;Title: Helium Is Hard to Replace    URL Source: https://www.construction-physics.com/p/helium-is-hard-to-replace    Published Time: 2026-04-09T12:03:42+00:00    Markdown Content:  The war in Iran, and the subsequent closure of the Strait of Hormuz, has unfortunately made us all familiar with details of the petroleum supply chain that we could formerly happily ignore. Every day we get some new story about some good or service that depends on Middle East petroleum and the production of which has been…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current helium shortage is largely attributed to the U.S. government liquidating its strategic reserves at artificially low prices, which stifled market incentives for private extraction and led to the resource being undervalued as a &amp;#34;party balloon&amp;#34; commodity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720130&quot; title=&quot;I really enjoyed this oddlots podcast episode that covered similar points and had a lot of &amp;#39;wat&amp;#39; moments for me, including the US selling off its strategic helium reserves at a loss because politicians labeled it &amp;#39;party baloon reserve&amp;#39;, and how long it takes to produce naturally and how hard it is to find, process and transport. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bjc6MgUY0BE&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720367&quot; title=&quot;Part of the reason there&amp;#39;s a shortage is because the US was the main supplier. There was no market incentive for anyone to invest into helium extraction. It&amp;#39;d be like if the US used it&amp;#39;s strategic oil reserve to supply the US with oil at a low price at all times. A strategic reserve isn&amp;#39;t supposed to be used as a supply. The existence of a strategic reserve shouldn&amp;#39;t have an effect on the supply of helium except in an emergency. The fact that selling the helium reserve could create a shortage…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While helium is a byproduct of natural gas, over 90% of plants currently vent it into the atmosphere because recovery is viewed as a financial and engineering hurdle rather than a physical impossibility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47721676&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;10% of natural gas plants recover helium.  All of them extract it.  The remaining &amp;gt;90% vent it into the atmosphere.   This is an engineering / money problem, not a physics problem.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters note that as the world transitions away from fossil fuels, finding alternatives will be difficult because helium is a noble gas that cannot be synthesized through chemical reactions, leaving only cost-prohibitive options like nuclear fusion or radioactive decay &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47722042&quot; title=&quot;It becomes a larger problem as the world moves away from fossil fuels like natural gas. I&amp;#39;m not a chemist but are there really no alternatives?  Running fusion plants to make helium seems very unlikely to become cost effective, but it would be quite the sci-fi future if we filled party balloons by bombarding hydrogen with free protons. I guess there aren&amp;#39;t any easy molecules to break apart to get helium either since its a noble gas.  No hydrolyses type solutions because there aren&amp;#39;t any…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47719998&quot; title=&quot;Is there any way to actually produce helium other than nuclear fusion? I would assume not, but I&amp;#39;m not an expert in this field.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/Keychron/Keychron-Keyboards-Hardware-Design&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Industrial design files for Keychron keyboards and mice&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720419&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;453 points · 145 comments · by stingraycharles&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Keychron has released source-available industrial design files for over 100 keyboard and mouse models on GitHub, providing CAD assets in STEP, DXF, and DWG formats for personal use, education, and the creation of compatible commercial accessories. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/Keychron/Keychron-Keyboards-Hardware-Design&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - Keychron/Keychron-Keyboards-Hardware-Design: Industrial design files for Keychron keyboards and mice. 100+ models with CAD assets in STEP, DXF, DWG, and PDF. Source-available, with commercial use allowed for original compatible accessories within the license terms.    URL Source: https://github.com/Keychron/Keychron-Keyboards-Hardware-Design    Markdown Content:  [![Image 1: Models…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of Keychron’s industrial design files has sparked a debate over the legal complexities of &amp;#34;personal use&amp;#34; licenses for physical objects, with users questioning whether copyright on design files extends to commercial activities performed using the printed product &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47721260&quot; title=&quot;On the source-available piece: I&amp;#39;m not saying I&amp;#39;m for those over open source licenses in general, but Prusa brought up some fair questions when discussing the OCL. Essentially: define &amp;#39;personal use.&amp;#39; Have I violated a non-commercial license if I print this keyboard and then use it to build someone a website? Does CC-NC mean a Prusacaster -- or any guitar knob with such a license for that matter -- is strictly barred from being taken on tour? Or used to record albums that are then sold? (And I…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47721659&quot; title=&quot;Not a lawyer, but as I understand it the license is a matter of copyright, and the copyright only applies to the design files.  So as long as you&amp;#39;re making that keyboard for yourself then you should be good to do anything you want with the keyboard, because it is no longer using the license at that point. Now, what is interesting is if someone were to blatantly violate the license and start manufacturing commercial keyboards. I believe their only recourse would be to revoke their license of the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that physical items fall outside copyright&amp;#39;s reach once manufactured, others suggest that renders or 3D scans would clearly constitute derivative works &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47721898&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Not a lawyer, but as I understand it the license is a matter of copyright, and the copyright only applies to the design files. So as long as you&amp;#39;re making that keyboard for yourself then you should be good to do anything you want with the keyboard, because it is no longer using the license at that point. What if I take the design, print it, include the thing in a staged photo, and sell prints of the photo? What if I skip the printing and use the design files as a basis for a rendered photo or…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47722987&quot; title=&quot;Not a lawyer either, but: &amp;gt; What if I take the design, print it, include the thing in a staged photo, and sell prints of the photo? Probably fair use, provided the design wasn&amp;#39;t the main focus of the photo, but merely part of the &amp;#39;set dressing.&amp;#39; &amp;gt; What if I skip the printing and use the design files as a basis for a rendered photo or animation? &amp;gt; What if I print the design, then use a 3D scanner to recreate a file from the physical artifact? Those questions are simpler - both scenarios would be…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the discussion highlights a lack of physical keyboard showrooms in the US, forcing enthusiasts to rely on &amp;#34;buy and return&amp;#34; cycles or switch samplers, whereas cities like Tokyo and Taipei offer dedicated retail experiences &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47723437&quot; title=&quot;Sort of tangent - but I&amp;#39;ve always thought there would be physical stores in big cities (like NYC, where I am) where I could try a number of different keyboards and keys since it&amp;#39;s such a tactile experience. But there seems to be no stores like this? So... is everyone ordering keys and keyboards, returning them, trying others, etc.? I know there are key switch samplers... is that it? Thanks&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47723917&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, this is a US issue. If you go to Tokyo or Taipei, you will find physical stores in cities with many different kind of mechanical keyboards.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47724877&quot; title=&quot;I would love to visit a Tokyo store with mechanical keyboards! My solution is to buy a mech keyboard from some well respected vendor and try it out. I return the vast majority.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47723883&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; So... is everyone ordering keys and keyboards, returning them, trying others, etc.? I know there are key switch samplers... is that it? It&amp;#39;s pretty wild the degree to which our lives and economy depend on cheap shipping/trucking. Why have a store when a truck can deliver a 100g trinket for someone three States over.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/10/cpuid_site_hijacked/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;CPU-Z and HWMonitor compromised&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theregister.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47717847&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;403 points · 104 comments · by pashadee&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The official CPUID website was compromised in a supply-chain attack, leading to the distribution of malware-infected versions of the popular system utilities CPU-Z and HWMonitor. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/10/cpuid_site_hijacked/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;vxunderground&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2042483067655262461&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;vxunderground&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2042483067655262461&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;old.reddit.com&amp;amp;#x2F;r&amp;amp;#x2F;pcmasterrace&amp;amp;#x2F;comments&amp;amp;#x2F;1sh4e5l&amp;amp;#x2F;warning_hwmonitor_163_download_on_the_official&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;old.reddit.com&amp;amp;#x2F;r&amp;amp;#x2F;pcmasterrace&amp;amp;#x2F;comments&amp;amp;#x2F;1sh4e5l&amp;amp;#x2F;warni...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The CPUID website was compromised for approximately six hours, during which official download links were replaced with malicious installers while a key maintainer was away &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47719237&quot; title=&quot;some comments purportedly (i did not verify) from one of the maintainers: &amp;gt; Dear All, I&amp;#39;m Sam and in I&amp;#39;m working with Franck on CPU-Z (I&amp;#39;m doing the validator). Franck is unfortunately OOO for a couple weeks. I&amp;#39;m just out of bed after worked on Memtest86+ for most the night, so I&amp;#39;m doing my best to check everything. As very first checks, the file on our server looks fine ( https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/6c8faba4768754c3364e7c40... ) and the server doesn&amp;#39;t seems compromised. I&amp;#39;m…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Users noted that Windows Defender flagged the malware, but the warning was ignored by some due to the &amp;#34;corrosive effect&amp;#34; of frequent false positives in technical software &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47719638&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; after the download my Windows Defender instantly detecting a virus. &amp;gt; (because i am often working with programms which triggering the defender i just ignored that) This again shows the unfortunate corrosive effect of false-positives.  Probably impossible to solve while aggressively detecting viruses though.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. To mitigate such risks, commenters suggested using package managers like `winget` for signature verification &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47719586&quot; title=&quot;For windows users, this is an advantage of using `winget` for installing things.  It points to the installer hosted elsewhere, but it at least does a signature check.  The config for the latest installer is listed here: https://github.com/microsoft/winget-pkgs/blob/master/manifes... which you can install with: winget install --exact --id CPUID.CPU-Z (there is a --version flag where you can specify &amp;#39;2.19&amp;#39;, which the signature there is a month old, so it should be safe to install that way)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, implementing file integrity monitoring tools like Tripwire &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47721167&quot; title=&quot;Back in the 1990s, there was a tool called ‘tripwire’ that checked key files against expected checksums. As I recall, they recommended putting the expected values on a floppy disk and setting the ‘write protect’ tab, so the checksums couldn’t be changed.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, or running cron jobs to alert on unauthorized hash changes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720344&quot; title=&quot;After my Wordpress site got hacked way back through an exploit in one of the WP files, I set up a cron job that compared the hash of the static files with expected hash, and would fire off an email if they differed. The script lived above the web root, so they&amp;#39;d have to escape that to tamper with it, and was generated by another script. Saved me a couple of times since, well worth the 15 minutes I spent on setting it up.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/microsoft-suspends-dev-accounts-for-high-profile-open-source-projects/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft suspends dev accounts for high-profile open source projects&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bleepingcomputer.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47716412&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;364 points · 136 comments · by N19PEDL2&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft suspended developer accounts for several high-profile open-source projects, including WireGuard and VeraCrypt, after they failed a mandatory verification process; the company is now working to reinstate the accounts following public outcry from maintainers who were unable to publish Windows updates. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/microsoft-suspends-dev-accounts-for-high-profile-open-source-projects/&quot; title=&quot;Microsoft suspends dev accounts for high-profile open source projects    Microsoft has suspended developer accounts used to maintain multiple high-profile open-source projects without proper notification and no way to quickly reinstate them, effectively blocking them from publishing new software builds and security patches for Windows users.    [![BleepingComputer.com logo](https://www.bleepstatic.com/images/site/logo.png)](https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/)    *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a growing frustration with Microsoft’s &amp;#34;corporate speak&amp;#34; and the frequent use of &amp;#34;Action required&amp;#34; emails, which users argue creates a &amp;#34;crying wolf&amp;#34; effect that desensitizes people to genuine security threats &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47716936&quot; title=&quot;Microsoft loves sending emails with &amp;#39;Action required&amp;#39; in the subject, when actually no action is required, or it doesn&amp;#39;t apply to you, or whatever. Such corporate speak. It&amp;#39;s fun searching your email for &amp;#39;Action required&amp;#39; and finding all the things you were supposed to do and it turns out didn&amp;#39;t need to do anything about.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47717214&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Crying wolf&amp;#39; constantly like this is so frustrating. It waters down the message until they send something you really need to worry about, which you ignore like the rest of the pointless messages.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47717598&quot; title=&quot;What marketing/sales/HR types don’t seem to understand is that when everything is the highest priority, nothing is.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters believe these brand-damaging blunders will drive users toward Linux or MacOS, others argue that high hardware costs and limited retail availability keep most users tethered to Windows &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47716830&quot; title=&quot;lol, Microslop shooting themselves in the foot once again. At this point people will move to MacOS or Linux because so much damage to their brand can’t simply be ignored anymore.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47717603&quot; title=&quot;No they won&amp;#39;t, because Apple is out of reach for their pockets, and most OEMs still don&amp;#39;t sell Linux powered devices on the shops people go to.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47717706&quot; title=&quot;It is 800 euros for 8 GB device, no thanks, especially in coutries where many dream of getting 1000 euros a month.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, critics view these account suspensions as an abuse of centralized power, suggesting that such incidents serve as a necessary lesson on the dangers of over-dependence on Big Tech &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47716725&quot; title=&quot;In the tech world, security is mostly just a theater , it is used to push though unwanted and unpopular things, like access control, privacy invasion, etc... All this signing business, leads to one party having the final say, and guess what, they are going to abuse that power...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47717643&quot; title=&quot;Owwwwww...... :D I&amp;#39;ve no idea whether MS either has a veeeeery clever plan about what they are doing, and I just don&amp;#39;t get it, or whether that&amp;#39;s just completely stupid in the current times when Windows&amp;#39; fanbase is somewhat declining anyways. On the other hand, people always have a hard time understanding the trouble they order when they let things centralize too much. When they are too okay with depending on e.g. BigTech companies too much. And in that regard, those news are probably actually…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ericwbailey.website/published/a-compelling-title-that-is-cryptic-enough-to-get-you-to-take-action-on-it/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A compelling title that is cryptic enough to get you to take action on it&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ericwbailey.website)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47720827&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;289 points · 143 comments · by mooreds&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Eric Bailey’s article uses a meta-commentary approach to deconstruct the structural anatomy of a typical blog post, illustrating how titles, formatting, and content progression are engineered to engage readers and convey information. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ericwbailey.website/published/a-compelling-title-that-is-cryptic-enough-to-get-you-to-take-action-on-it/&quot; title=&quot;Title: A compelling title that is cryptic enough to get you to take action on it    URL Source: https://ericwbailey.website/published/a-compelling-title-that-is-cryptic-enough-to-get-you-to-take-action-on-it/    Published Time: 2026-04-09T00:05:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  # A compelling title that is cryptic enough to get you to take action on it – Eric Bailey  [Skip to main…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion is dominated by a consensus that the article is likely AI-generated, leading to reflections on the &amp;#34;Dead Internet&amp;#34; theory and expressions of gratitude for those who saved others&amp;#39; time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47721563&quot; title=&quot;A comment complaining this was obviously written by an AI, and the standard template is a tell. A philosophical observation about what that says about the state on online discourse. Link to the Dead Internet Wikipedia page.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47721770&quot; title=&quot;A response appreciating the comment above for saving ones time.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. The thread quickly devolves into a mix of bad-faith derailments, snarky rebuttals, and pleas for civility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47722351&quot; title=&quot;A bad faith response that attempts to derail the conversation from the original article.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47722666&quot; title=&quot;A snarky and insulting joke where the above commenter is the butt of the joke, calling attention to the bad faith response.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47723859&quot; title=&quot;A modest plea for civility.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Meanwhile, some users contribute by linking related meta-discussions or attempting to promote their own projects, while others offer commentary that reveals they never actually read the article &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47726610&quot; title=&quot;A post by dang about related posts: A Technical Blog Post by a Big Name Expert - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5326511 - March 2013 (189 comments) A compelling title that is cryptic enough to get you to take action on it - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43219556 - Feb 2025 (112 comments) A Hacker News thread where every comment describes itself - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38451203 - Nov 2023 (74 comments) A request for others to add to the list.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47721613&quot; title=&quot;A comment based on the reading of the title that could only be conceived if the commenter didn&amp;#39;t bother to click the article at all.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47721917&quot; title=&quot;An obvious attempt to insert a link into my own vibe-coded project, in the pretense it is either relevant or related.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/callumlocke/json-formatter&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;JSON formatter Chrome plugin now closed and injecting adware&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47721946&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;284 points · 135 comments · by jkl5xx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The JSON Formatter Chrome extension has transitioned to a closed-source commercial model, leading the developer to archive the original repository and release &amp;#34;JSON Formatter Classic&amp;#34; as a final open-source version for users seeking a simple, local-only tool. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/callumlocke/json-formatter&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - callumlocke/json-formatter: Makes JSON easy to read.    URL Source: https://github.com/callumlocke/json-formatter    Markdown Content:  # GitHub - callumlocke/json-formatter: Makes JSON easy to read. · GitHub    [Skip to content](https://github.com/callumlocke/json-formatter#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [](https://github.com/)    [Sign in](https://github.com/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcallumlocke%2Fjson-formatter)    Appearance settings    *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The popular &amp;#34;JSON Formatter&amp;#34; extension has transitioned to closed-source and begun injecting adware and geolocation tracking into users&amp;#39; browsers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47721947&quot; title=&quot;Noticed a suspicious element called give-freely-root-bcjindcccaagfpapjjmafapmmgkkhgoa in the chrome inspector today. Turns out about a month ago, the popular open source [JSON Formatter chrome extension]( https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/json-formatter/bcji... ) went closed source and started injecting adware into checkout pages. Also seems to be doing some geolocation tracking. I didn&amp;#39;t see this come up on hn, so I figured I&amp;#39;d sound the alarm for all the privacy-conscious folks here.…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. This shift is particularly notable because the author previously &amp;#34;solemnly swore&amp;#34; on Hacker News that they would never sell out or compromise user data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47724977&quot; title=&quot;From the author on HN a couple years ago: &amp;gt; FWIW, and since a few of you probably use it… I own the JSON Formatter extension [0], which I created and open-sourced 12 years ago and have maintained [1] ever since, with 2 million users today. And I solemnly swear that I will never add any code that sends any data anywhere, nor let it fall into the hands of anyone else who would.  I’ve been emailed several tempting cash offers from shady people who presumably want to steal everyone’s data or worse.…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters criticized the current extension marketplace model, arguing that auto-updating small tools creates a massive security risk and that users should instead install extensions from source to avoid silent malicious updates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47721947&quot; title=&quot;Noticed a suspicious element called give-freely-root-bcjindcccaagfpapjjmafapmmgkkhgoa in the chrome inspector today. Turns out about a month ago, the popular open source [JSON Formatter chrome extension]( https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/json-formatter/bcji... ) went closed source and started injecting adware into checkout pages. Also seems to be doing some geolocation tracking. I didn&amp;#39;t see this come up on hn, so I figured I&amp;#39;d sound the alarm for all the privacy-conscious folks here.…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47724474&quot; title=&quot;I think the main problem here is the ideology of software updating. Updates represent a tradeoff: On one hand there might be security vulnerabilities that need an update to fix, and developers don&amp;#39;t want to receive bug reports or maintain server infrastructure for obsolete versions. On the other hand, the developer might make decisions users don&amp;#39;t want, or turn even temporarily (as in a supply chain attack) or permanently (as in selling off control of a browser extension). In the case of small…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a debate regarding Google&amp;#39;s enforcement policies, with some claiming the store allows ad injection while others note that such behavior is grounds for removal &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47723573&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s OK to inject ads, but not OK to remove them, under Google&amp;#39;s current policies.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47723845&quot; title=&quot;Well no, actually. Both halves of that statement are false. Injecting ads will get you removed from the extension store if caught, while adblockers are advertised on the front page of the store.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-04-09</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-04-09</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/eff-leaving-x&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;EFF is leaving X&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (eff.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706268&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1421 points&lt;/strong&gt; · &lt;strong&gt;1300 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by gregsadetsky&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is leaving X after nearly 20 years, citing a drastic decline in engagement and concerns over the platform&amp;#39;s security and content moderation policies under Elon Musk’s ownership. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/eff-leaving-x&quot; title=&quot;Title: EFF is Leaving X    URL Source: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/eff-leaving-x    Published Time: 2026-04-09T09:25:05-07:00    Markdown Content:  # EFF is Leaving X | Electronic Frontier Foundation  [Skip to main content](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/eff-leaving-x#main-content)    *   [About](https://www.eff.org/about)      *   [Contact](https://www.eff.org/about/contact)      *   [Press](https://www.eff.org/press/contact)      *   [People](https://www.eff.org/about/staff &amp;#39;Details and…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The EFF’s departure from X has sparked debate over whether the move is a strategic response to platform degradation or a purely ideological shift &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706557&quot; title=&quot;That statement pretty clearly shows that they have certain ideological concerns that they value more highly than the kind of stuff we tend to think the EFF primarily cares about (digital privacy, open source, patent trolling, etc). Through that lens, I guess it makes sense that they see TikTok, Instagram, and BlueSky as worth their time and presence but not X.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706531&quot; title=&quot;If they justify it in terms of reach and impressions then say they will still be on BlueSky and Mastodon then you know it&amp;#39;s purely ideological. Which is fine but just be honest about it.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that leaving X abandons &amp;#34;regular people&amp;#34; and reduces the EFF&amp;#39;s reach compared to staying on other problematic platforms like TikTok or Meta &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47707501&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Our presence on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok is not an endorsement [...] We stay because the people on those platforms deserve access to information, too. We stay because some of our most-read posts are the ones criticizing the very platform we&amp;#39;re posting on. We stay because the fewer steps between you and the resources you need to protect yourself, the better. Does this not apply to X users?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47707377&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; We&amp;#39;ll Keep Fighting. Just Not on X Yeah, somewhere where regular people that aren&amp;#39;t terminally online won&amp;#39;t ever have the chance to see it. This is a dumb decision. I&amp;#39;d very much like for open, distributed social networks to win, but that&amp;#39;s not a reality we&amp;#39;ll be living in anytime soon. X, for better or worse, gets you eyes, more so than any other alternative social media.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, while supporters contend that X&amp;#39;s active suppression of certain viewpoints and the dismantling of its human rights teams made continued presence untenable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706567&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;re the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Of course they&amp;#39;re ideological. That&amp;#39;s the whole point of their existence. Anyway, &amp;gt; Twitter was never a utopia. We&amp;#39;ve criticized the platform for about as long as it’s been around. Still, Twitter did deserve recognition from time to time for vociferously fighting for its users’ rights. That changed. Musk fired the entire human rights team and laid off staffers in countries where the company previously fought off censorship demands from repressive…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47710544&quot; title=&quot;The problem they&amp;#39;re not talking about is that for all the X users they could potentially help, their messages will be actively suppressed by the platform owner. Nate Silver, famously popular (...lol) with the online left, made a post about this recently: https://www.natesilver.net/p/social-media-has-become-a-freak... EFF is, politically, left wing.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Some commenters emphasize that as a political activist organization, the EFF is inherently ideological, and its exit reflects a refusal to support a platform owner whose rhetoric and business practices have crossed a moral threshold &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47707038&quot; title=&quot;My grandparents were pretty WASPy, conservative people who lived in northern Idaho. And they hated the white supremacist/neonazi groups up there with a burning passion. They were of an age to remember people going off to fight in Germany and Asia against that kind of ideology. They would have been absolutely appalled and ashamed to see a business leader throwing those salutes and backing it up with talk of a &amp;#39;white homeland&amp;#39; and similar comments. I find it deeply dismaying that people consider…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47707217&quot; title=&quot;The EFF is and has always been a political activist organization. Of course they care about ideological concerns.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47707087&quot; title=&quot;Astounds me that anyone is still using that platform after seeing how Musk treated the engineers when he took over.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://obdev.at/products/littlesnitch-linux/index.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LittleSnitch for Linux&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (obdev.at)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47697870&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1364 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 456 comments · by pluc&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Objective Development has released Little Snitch for Linux, an eBPF-based network monitor that allows users to visualize, track, and block application connections. The tool features a web-based interface, supports automated blocklists, and is free to use, though it requires Linux kernel 6.12 or higher. &lt;a href=&quot;https://obdev.at/products/littlesnitch-linux/index.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Little Snitch for Linux    URL Source: https://obdev.at/products/littlesnitch-linux/index.html    Published Time: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 06:00:03 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Little Snitch for Linux  - [x] [](https://obdev.at/)[](https://obdev.at/)[Products](https://obdev.at/products/)[![Image 1](https://obdev.at/Images/product-icons/littlesnitch_32.png)Little Snitch](https://obdev.at/products/littlesnitch)[![Image 2](https://obdev.at/Images/product-icons/littlesnitch_mini_32.png)Little Snitch…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of Little Snitch for Linux has sparked a debate over the trade-off between user experience and the security of closed-source software, with some users questioning the wisdom of trusting a proprietary kernel-level tool when open-source alternatives like OpenSnitch exist &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47698003&quot; title=&quot;Also from [0]. &amp;gt; You can find Little Snitch for Linux here. It is free, and it will stay that way. Don&amp;#39;t worry, the authors know that there&amp;#39;s no point in charging Linux users. Unlike Mac users. So you might as well make it $0 and the (Linux) crowd goes wild that they don&amp;#39;t need to pay a cent. However... &amp;gt; I researched a bit, found OpenSnitch, several command line tools, and various security systems built for servers. None of these gave me what I wanted: see which process is making which…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47697992&quot; title=&quot;How does it compare to opensnitch? https://github.com/evilsocket/opensnitch&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47698661&quot; title=&quot;Okay hear me out, I use little snitch for a while. Great product. Love finding out what phones where. I make every single request (except my browser, because I&amp;#39;m fine with their sandbox) block until I approve. Recently I was wondering how you really have to trust something like little snitch given its a full kernel extension effectively able to MITM your whole network stack. So I went digging (and asked some agents to deep research), and I couldn&amp;#39;t find much interesting about the company or its…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some express skepticism regarding the developer&amp;#39;s motivations for offering the tool for free on Linux, others argue that the company’s 20-year reputation on macOS provides sufficient credibility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47698003&quot; title=&quot;Also from [0]. &amp;gt; You can find Little Snitch for Linux here. It is free, and it will stay that way. Don&amp;#39;t worry, the authors know that there&amp;#39;s no point in charging Linux users. Unlike Mac users. So you might as well make it $0 and the (Linux) crowd goes wild that they don&amp;#39;t need to pay a cent. However... &amp;gt; I researched a bit, found OpenSnitch, several command line tools, and various security systems built for servers. None of these gave me what I wanted: see which process is making which…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47698057&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Do you still trust them not to do self-reporting or phoning home, even though it is $0 and closed source? If you trust Little Snitch on Mac, then yes. They&amp;#39;ve been in business for over 20 years. They&amp;#39;re not going to blow their entire business and reputation for a few Linux users.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47698672&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; All a long way to say, anyone know anything about this company? Yes, they are indie Mac developers who have been in business for more than 20 years, and Little Snitch for Mac is beloved by many users for a long time.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The port is also seen by some as a sign of increasing Linux desktop maturity, potentially signaling a shift in mainstream adoption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47700120&quot; title=&quot;I know it sounds crazy at this point, but with popular YouTubers switching to Linux, gamers overall well-aware of Steam on Linux advantages and switching as well, plus popular software like LittleSnitch getting ported, 2026 can without irony be named as Year of Linux Desktop, right?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://updates.thunderbird.net/en-US/thunderbird/140.0/apr26-1e/donate/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Help Keep Thunderbird Alive&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (updates.thunderbird.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47700388&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;575 points · 387 comments · by playfultones&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Thunderbird team is seeking financial contributions from users to fund server maintenance, bug fixes, and feature development for its free, privacy-focused email application. &lt;a href=&quot;https://updates.thunderbird.net/en-US/thunderbird/140.0/apr26-1e/donate/&quot; title=&quot;Help Keep Thunderbird Alive!    Thunderbird is a free email application that’s easy to set up and customize - and it’s loaded with great features!    # Help Keep Thunderbird Alive    ![](/media/img/thunderbird/appeal/dec24/forest-roc.png)    [Click here to **Donate!**    Help keep **Thunderbird Alive!**](?form=apr26&amp;amp;utm_content=apr26-e&amp;amp;utm_source=in_app&amp;amp;utm_medium=desktop&amp;amp;utm_campaign=apr26_appeal)    All of the work we do is funded by less than 3% of our users.    We never show advertisements or sell your…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Long-time users praise Thunderbird as a reliable, cross-platform tool that remains the best option for complex email requirements &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701982&quot; title=&quot;After reading a bunch of negative comments here, let me add a little on the bright side. I&amp;#39;ve been using Thunderbird for many years, currently both at home and at work to manage gmail accounts, pop at home, imap in the office. It works great for me, with a few annoyances but nothing serious. As for the donations, Thunderbird seems to be somehow apart from Mozilla now, so I don&amp;#39;t think much about specific org structure and will gladly donate. Maybe on paper there&amp;#39;re dozens of alternatives, but…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701868&quot; title=&quot;I really like Thunderbird, it&amp;#39;s the only truly cross-platform mail app, with K9 also now on Android. Works perfect, I even migrated my Windows install to Linux just by copying the data folder, absolutely seamless. Not sure why people are hating on it so much here. Point to an alternative with the same features?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47702096&quot; title=&quot;I use Thunderbird from the beginning when it was still named Firebird (I switched from Outlook Express). I think that it&amp;#39;s a good product because it continues to do the job since more than 20 years. Me too I don&amp;#39;t understand the negative comments. It&amp;#39;s free (MPL license), it&amp;#39;s packaged by Debian. All good. I don&amp;#39;t care about Mozilla.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, significant debate exists regarding financial transparency, with some users hesitant to donate due to the project&amp;#39;s complex relationship with Mozilla and a perceived lack of clarity on how funds are allocated &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47702750&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been using Thunderbird for decades, I&amp;#39;ve donated in the past, and am likely to donate again. With that out of the way, the lack of transparency as to what happens to my money kills the incentive to donate. &amp;#39;How will my gift be used?&amp;#39; &amp;#39;Thunderbird is the leading open source email and productivity app that is free for business and personal use. Your gift helps ensure it stays that way, and supports ongoing development.&amp;#39; Well that tells me exactly nothing. This might not be as big an issue if…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701345&quot; title=&quot;Mozilla brings in almost $700 million per year, they have more than enough money to sponsor MZLA/Thunderbird development.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701457&quot; title=&quot;Campaigns like this need more info. This page doesn&amp;#39;t answer any basic questions. How much money do you currently get? How much money do you need and how will you use it? Does it even go directly to Thunderbird development or will be used up by Mozilla for other projects? Edit: I found some info here: https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/donate/ Still, my point stands that communication around it should be super clear and available on all pages where they collect money. It shouldn&amp;#39;t require me to…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. The CEO of the entity behind Thunderbird clarified that they rely solely on donations, are currently developing an iOS app and a new email service, and operate under a for-profit subsidiary to provide a stable legal and financial home &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47709082&quot; title=&quot;CEO of MZLA (the Mozilla entity that develops Thunderbird). One point of clarification, we don&amp;#39;t get money from any source but our donors. After years of funding issues, MZLA was created by the Mozilla Foundation and the Thunderbird Council (our community governance body), to provide a legal/financial home for Thunderbird. Launching Thundermail this year (an email service) which we hope to help provide even more funds for development, beyond just donations. Also serving a user need (lots of our…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701441&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; MZLA Technologies Corporation is a wholly owned for-profit subsidiary of the Mozilla Foundation and the home of Thunderbird. I guess I don&amp;#39;t understand why the open-source email client with zero revenue potential is managed by a for-profit subsidiary, nor why that for-profit subsidiary is begging for donations. Shouldn&amp;#39;t this whole thing be managed by the non-profit Mozilla Foundation?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arhan.sh/blog/native-instant-space-switching-on-macos/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Native Instant Space Switching on macOS&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (arhan.sh)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47708818&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;637 points · 321 comments · by PaulHoule&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;InstantSpaceSwitcher is a lightweight menu bar application for macOS that enables instant space switching without animations by simulating high-velocity trackpad swipes, avoiding the need to disable System Integrity Protection. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arhan.sh/blog/native-instant-space-switching-on-macos/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Native Instant Space Switching on MacOS    URL Source: https://arhan.sh/blog/native-instant-space-switching-on-macos/    Published Time: Thu, 09 Apr 2026 22:46:07 GMT    Markdown Content:  The worst part about the MacOS window management situation is the inability to instantly switch spaces, and that Apple has [continuously ignored requests](https://discussions.apple.com/thread/253938203?sortBy=rank) to disable the nauseating switching animation. Sure, it’s not _that_ long, but I switch spaces…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users report that macOS Space-switching animations are inexplicably slower on 120Hz displays, causing input focus to remain on the previous space until the transition completes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47710293&quot; title=&quot;I grew up with this animation so I didn&amp;#39;t consider it annoying until I bought a new Macbook a couple years ago. I noticed sometimes I would press keyboard shortcuts before my system&amp;#39;s focus had switched. Just little stumbles here and there, some inoffensive, some annoying, but who knows maybe I didn&amp;#39;t catch enough sleep. Over time it happened often enough that I decided to google it, and it turns out my muscle memory wasn&amp;#39;t failing me; the animation speed did change ever so slightly and was…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47710267&quot; title=&quot;Just wait until you notice that it’s inexplicably slower on 120hz monitors and that your input devices remain focused on the previous space until the animation fully completes!&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. This lag disrupts muscle memory and has led to frustration over Apple&amp;#39;s failure to address the bug despite years of user complaints &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47710293&quot; title=&quot;I grew up with this animation so I didn&amp;#39;t consider it annoying until I bought a new Macbook a couple years ago. I noticed sometimes I would press keyboard shortcuts before my system&amp;#39;s focus had switched. Just little stumbles here and there, some inoffensive, some annoying, but who knows maybe I didn&amp;#39;t catch enough sleep. Over time it happened often enough that I decided to google it, and it turns out my muscle memory wasn&amp;#39;t failing me; the animation speed did change ever so slightly and was…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47710680&quot; title=&quot;This is such an insane bug to still have around all these years. Are apple engineers not using macOS?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47710002&quot; title=&quot;God damnit I didn&amp;#39;t know until 15 seconds ago that the Space-switching animation in macOS was annoying. Thanks a lot!&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Consequently, many participants recommend abandoning native Spaces in favor of third-party window managers like Rectangle, AeroSpace, or OmniWM to achieve a more responsive workflow &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47710908&quot; title=&quot;Stop using MacOS spaces. Never full screen anything. Throw everything around with hotkeys using OSS rectangle. Use shortcat to automatically bring your cursor to anything on your screen and use enter to click and type.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47710172&quot; title=&quot;I see yabai mentioned, definitely check out Aerospace. Ive tried multiple WMs after years of i3 on Linux and this is the best one I found (for me) with quite a margin. It just works (tm) https://github.com/nikitabobko/AeroSpace&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47709230&quot; title=&quot;Having been ruined by Linux options like Hyperland and Niri, I’m digging my early foray into OmniWM - https://github.com/BarutSRB/OmniWM&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.axios.com/2026/04/09/meta-social-media-addiction-ads&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Meta removes ads for social media addiction litigation&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (axios.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47703419&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;628 points · 251 comments · by giuliomagnifico&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.axios.com/2026/04/09/meta-social-media-addiction-ads&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meta’s decision to ban advertisements for litigation against itself has sparked debate over whether the company is acting as a biased publisher or an impartial platform &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47704098&quot; title=&quot;Meta wants to be an impartial platform only and exactly when it suits them to be.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47703975&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;  &amp;#39;We will not allow trial lawyers to profit from our platforms while simultaneously claiming they are harmful.&amp;#39; Wow.. That is quite a statement. Am I right in saying that in order to claim for the class action lawsuit, which facebook has been &amp;#39;found negligent&amp;#39;, that the victims need to take an action collectively in order to claim ? IE They need to be reached somehow to inform them of the possibility ? Seems the most obvious place to advertise would be Meta. I understand Meta can basically do…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue it is &amp;#34;naive&amp;#34; to expect a corporation to host ads for its own downfall &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47703669&quot; title=&quot;The idea that Meta is obligated to be so impartial that it must allow lawsuits against itself to be promoted on its own platform is a bit naive and utopian. Its own TOS states that they won’t allow that.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that such blatant self-interest provides further ammunition for critics and regulators to hold Meta accountable for the content it hosts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47705528&quot; title=&quot;Wow. Does Zuckerberg have some kind of clinical condition where he just can&amp;#39;t imagine how other people might see him? Sure this will slow down the personal injury lawyers finding clients but it won&amp;#39;t stop them,  meantime it is more ammunition for Facebook&amp;#39;s enemies to use against it. It is one thing to do shady business,  it is another thing to incriminate yourself.  If you were involved with weed and somebody sent you an email asking if they could come around and pick up a Q.P. next Saturday…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47703730&quot; title=&quot;Fair enough. If they&amp;#39;re not impartial then lets hold them accountable for the content published in their platform.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also highlights a tension between the perceived &amp;#34;scummy&amp;#34; nature of class-action lawyers and their role as one of the few mechanisms for holding tech giants accountable for social harm &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47705028&quot; title=&quot;As an aside, class-action lawsuits seem less than ideal for the public. The awards benefit the lawyers and perhaps a small handful, but the actual plaintiffs only get $0.05. In addition, successful class-action suits prevent further litigation from being allowed for the same issue. Individuals bringing their own lawsuits seems like it would affect better change as 1) the award money would be better distributed instead of concentrated and 2) the amounts levied against the companies would be…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47704569&quot; title=&quot;How do you know that? How could you know that? These people are one of the few people holding Meta accountable for their evil acts and because of that you call them &amp;#39;scummiest people in the US&amp;#39; That&amp;#39;s nonsense.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cacm.acm.org/news/how-nasa-built-artemis-iis-fault-tolerant-computer/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How NASA built Artemis II’s fault-tolerant computer&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cacm.acm.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47704804&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;630 points · 233 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NASA’s Artemis II mission utilizes a &amp;#34;fail-silent&amp;#34; architecture featuring eight CPUs across four flight control modules that use deterministic timing and self-checking pairs to automatically detect, silence, and reset processors affected by cosmic radiation or hardware faults. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cacm.acm.org/news/how-nasa-built-artemis-iis-fault-tolerant-computer/&quot; title=&quot;Title: How NASA Built Artemis II’s Fault-Tolerant Computer    URL Source: https://cacm.acm.org/news/how-nasa-built-artemis-iis-fault-tolerant-computer/    Published Time: 2026-04-08T19:58:08Z    Markdown Content:  # How NASA Built Artemis II’s Fault-Tolerant Computer – Communications of the ACM    ![Image 1: logo](blob:http://localhost/4eb6460ab93a7ae1978320dda45af1eb)    [](https://www.cookiebot.com/en/what-is-behind-powered-by-cookiebot/?utm_source=banner_cb&amp;amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;amp;utm_content=v2)    *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the tension between NASA’s highly disciplined, deterministic architectural approach and modern &amp;#34;Agile&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;DevOps&amp;#34; methodologies, with some arguing that industry has lost the ability to build truly robust systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47711967&quot; title=&quot;The quote from the CMU guy about modern Agile and DevOps approaches challenging architectural discipline is a nice way of saying most of us have completely forgotten how to build deterministic systems. Time-triggered Ethernet with strict frame scheduling feels like it&amp;#39;s from a parallel universe compared to how we ship software now.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47713378&quot; title=&quot;Agile is not meant to make solid, robust products. It’s so you can make product fragments/iterations quickly, with okay quality and out to the customer asap to maximize profits.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics contend that the project’s complexity is an over-engineered, bureaucratic &amp;#34;money pit&amp;#34; that relies on brute-force redundancy rather than technical breakthroughs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47712120&quot; title=&quot;I take the opposite message from that line - out of touch teams working on something so over budget and so overdue, and so bureaucratic, and with such an insanely poor history of success, and they talk as if they have cured cancer. This is the equivalent of Altavista touting how amazing their custom server racks are when Google just starts up on a rack of naked motherboards and eats their lunch and then the world. Lets at least wait till the capsule comes back safely before touting how much…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47713643&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not like the approach they took is any different. Just slapped 8x the number of computers on it for calculating the same thing and wait to see if they disagree. Not the pinnacle of engineering. The equivalent of throwing money at the problem.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47712703&quot; title=&quot;The problem they solved isn&amp;#39;t easy. But its not some insane technical breakthrough either. Literally add redundancy, thats the ask. They didnt invent quantum computing to solve the issue did they? Why dunk on sprints?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Others defend the high costs and bespoke nature of the system, noting that manned spaceflight requires extreme reliability where failure is not an option &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47712431&quot; title=&quot;No, space is just hard. Everything is bespoke. You need 10x cost to get every extra &amp;#39;9&amp;#39; in reliability and manned flight needs a lot of nines. People died on the Apollo missions. It just costs that much.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, while also clarifying that the hardware was primarily built by Lockheed Martin rather than NASA itself &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47712482&quot; title=&quot;NASA didn&amp;#39;t build this, Lockheed Martin and their subcontractors did.  Articles and headlines like this make people think that NASA does a lot more than they actually do.  This is like a CEO claiming credit for everything a company does.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dwyer.co.za/static/claude-mixes-up-who-said-what-and-thats-not-ok.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Claude mixes up who said what&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (dwyer.co.za)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701233&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;461 points · 351 comments · by sixhobbits&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A widespread bug in Claude causes the AI to misattribute its own internal messages to the user, leading the model to execute destructive or unauthorized actions while falsely insisting it was following direct human instructions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dwyer.co.za/static/claude-mixes-up-who-said-what-and-thats-not-ok.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Claude mixes up who said what, and that&amp;#39;s not OK    URL Source: https://dwyer.co.za/static/claude-mixes-up-who-said-what-and-thats-not-ok.html    Published Time: Thu, 09 Apr 2026 11:24:12 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Claude mixes up who said what, and that&amp;#39;s not OK  🌙Dark  # Claude mixes up    who said what    And that&amp;#39;s not OK. This bug is categorically distinct from hallucinations or missing permission boundaries.    By [Gareth Dwyer](https://dwyer.co.za/) · April 2026    ## The bug    Claude sometimes…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary security and reliability flaw in LLMs is the lack of an architectural boundary between data and control paths, making them susceptible to &amp;#34;prompt injection&amp;#34; style failures where user input is mistaken for instructions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701555&quot; title=&quot;Everything to do with LLM prompts reminds me of people doing regexes to try and sanitise input against SQL injections a few decades ago, just papering over the flaw but without any guarantees. It&amp;#39;s weird seeing people just adding a few more &amp;#39;REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY DON&amp;#39;T DO THAT&amp;#39; to the prompt and hoping, to me it&amp;#39;s just an unacceptable risk, and any system using these needs to treat the entire LLM as untrusted the second you put any user input into the prompt.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47702425&quot; title=&quot;The principal security problem of LLMs is that there is no architectural boundary between data and control paths. But this combination of data and control into a single, flexible data stream is also the defining strength of a LLM, so it can’t be taken away without also taking away the benefits.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that fixed seeds and temperatures provide determinism &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47702100&quot; title=&quot;That is &amp;#39;fundamentally&amp;#39; not true, you can use a preset seed and temperature and get a deterministic output.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the extreme sensitivity to minor input changes makes them fundamentally non-deterministic in practice &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47702072&quot; title=&quot;Fundamentally there&amp;#39;s no way to deterministically guarantee anything about the output.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47702387&quot; title=&quot;The real issue is expecting an LLM to be deterministic when it&amp;#39;s not.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47702181&quot; title=&quot;A single byte change in the input changes the output. The sentence &amp;#39;Please do this for me&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;Please, do this for me&amp;#39; can lead to completely distinct output. Given this, you can&amp;#39;t treat it as deterministic even with temp 0 and fixed seed and no memory.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable anecdotes include Claude hallucinating user consent to commit code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47702066&quot; title=&quot;I’ve hit this! In my otherwise wildly successful attempt to translate a Haskell codebase to Clojure [0], Claude at one point asks: [Claude:] Shall I commit this progress? [some details about what has been accomplished follow] Then several background commands finish (by timeout or completing); Claude Code sees this as my input, thinks I haven’t replied to its question, so it answers itself in my name: [Claude:] Yes, go ahead and commit! Great progress. The decodeFloat discovery was key. The full…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt; and long-running chats where models eventually confuse their own responses with system prompts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701550&quot; title=&quot;In chats that run long enough on ChatGPT, you&amp;#39;ll see it begin to confuse prompts and responses, and eventually even confuse both for its system prompt . I suspect this sort of problem exists widely in AI.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thelettersfromleo.com/p/the-pentagon-threatened-pope-leo&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Pentagon Threatened Pope Leo XIV&amp;#39;s Ambassador with the Avignon Papacy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (thelettersfromleo.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47705952&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;470 points · 307 comments · by frm88&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pentagon officials reportedly threatened a Vatican ambassador with military force and referenced the Avignon Papacy to pressure the Holy See into supporting U.S. foreign policy, leading Pope Leo XIV to cancel a planned 2026 visit to the United States. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thelettersfromleo.com/p/the-pentagon-threatened-pope-leo&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Pentagon Threatened Pope Leo XIV’s Ambassador With the Avignon Papacy    URL Source: https://www.thelettersfromleo.com/p/the-pentagon-threatened-pope-leo    Published Time: 2026-04-08T16:24:06+00:00    Markdown Content:  [![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on whether the Pentagon’s reference to the Avignon Papacy was a calculated strategic move &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706107&quot; title=&quot;It doesn&amp;#39;t sound like a heat-of-the-moment reference, but a very calculated one based on this line from the article: &amp;gt; According to his sources, Colby’s team picked apart the pope’s January state-of-the-world address line by line and read it as a hostile message aimed directly at the administration.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, a &amp;#34;hothead&amp;#34; threat potentially generated by AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706221&quot; title=&quot;It sounds like some hothead idiot driven by the big orange hothead idiot prompted Claude about how to threaten the Vatican and then used its talking points on the ambassador. So &amp;#39;calculated&amp;#39; maybe, but only because AI could come up with the answer, I have serious doubts that many of these people possess more than basic literacy much less the ability to come up with something like this.  Or some CIA analyst who hates their job came up with this to mock their bosses.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, or a display of historical illiteracy regarding the Church&amp;#39;s longevity as a global power broker &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706541&quot; title=&quot;Wow. I knew the current administration was bad but this is something extra. It also shows the short-sightedness of the &amp;#39;scholars&amp;#39; in the administration. Sure, the Avignon Papacy did occur, that&amp;#39;s historical fact. It&amp;#39;s also a historical fact that the Catholic Church is an actually ancient power broker in the world still and they have been around for much, much longer than the United States. The Church is actually quite good at playing the long game (and I say that as someone raised firmly…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the history is common knowledge for any student &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706368&quot; title=&quot;Any middle schooler with a passing interest in history is aware of the Avignon papacy. Jumping to “AI” is a bit much.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest the incident highlights a growing rift between secular political interests and religious institutions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706182&quot; title=&quot;I have recently deepened my search in Christianity which started with the Catholic Church, one of few points I struggle with when it comes to Catholicism is the papacy, and the Avignon Papacy debacle and the events that followed (a la Western Schism) has quite a bit to do with that. I was a little confused by what they meant here by “threatening with the Avignon Papacy.” If anyone else is curious, I think the phrase “Babylonian Captivity” will provide better context, as it is what some…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706229&quot; title=&quot;Time in minutes after which christian nationalists will form a circular firing squad once they&amp;#39;ve cemented their grip on the US government: 2 The past which the &amp;#39;make america great again&amp;#39; people want to take us back to absolutely loathed Catholics, something I don&amp;#39;t think modern Catholics realize. The colony of Maryland was originally intended to be a safe place for Catholics, and the first chance the Puritans got, they revolted, invaded, burned the Catholic churches down and persecuted their…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also touches on the irony of modern political movements embracing Catholicism despite a deep-seated American history of anti-Catholic sentiment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706229&quot; title=&quot;Time in minutes after which christian nationalists will form a circular firing squad once they&amp;#39;ve cemented their grip on the US government: 2 The past which the &amp;#39;make america great again&amp;#39; people want to take us back to absolutely loathed Catholics, something I don&amp;#39;t think modern Catholics realize. The colony of Maryland was originally intended to be a safe place for Catholics, and the first chance the Puritans got, they revolted, invaded, burned the Catholic churches down and persecuted their…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706058&quot; title=&quot;I doubt many are Catholic. J.D. Vance would be an option, tho.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706117&quot; title=&quot;It is literally this tweet from a few years ago: &amp;gt; Every lifelong Catholic I&amp;#39;ve ever met is like &amp;#39;I think we&amp;#39;re supposed to give this food to poor people&amp;#39; and every adult convert is like &amp;#39;the Archon of Constantinople&amp;#39;s epistle on the Pentacostine rites of the eucharist clearly states women shouldn&amp;#39;t have driver&amp;#39;s licenses.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://playstarfling.com&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Starfling: A one-tap endless orbital slingshot game in a single HTML file&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (playstarfling.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47698455&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;612 points · 152 comments · by iceberger2001&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Starfling is a one-tap endless mobile game contained in a single HTML file where players score points by timing releases to slingshot between stars. &lt;a href=&quot;https://playstarfling.com&quot; title=&quot;Title: STARFLING    URL Source: https://playstarfling.com/    Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.    Markdown Content:  # STARFLING — Tap. Release. Chain.    0    0    BEST: 0    [R]    # S TAR F LING    tap to release    sling between stars · don&amp;#39;t miss    tap anywhere to play    ## PAUSED    SCORE: 0    RESUME RESTART    REMOVE ADS — $2.99    0    DON&amp;#39;T LOSE YOUR RUN!    ▶ WATCH AD TO CONTINUE    NO THANKS    ## game over    0    0 stars    ★ NEW BEST ★    PLAY AGAIN WATCH AD TO REVIVE    GET…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While users praised the game&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;satisfying&amp;#34; feel and trail art, many criticized the orbital mechanics for being physically inaccurate, noting that stars often seem to deflect the spacecraft rather than attract it &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47698456&quot; title=&quot;Hey HN,  I built STARFLING, a simple hyper-casual space game you can play right in your browser. You orbit a star with a ball. Tap anywhere to release and sling it through space. Catch the next star to lock in orbit and keep going. Miss and it&amp;#39;s game over. The whole thing is just one HTML file with vanilla JS, Canvas, and Web Audio. No frameworks, no build step. Loads in under 2 seconds on phone or desktop. There&amp;#39;s a combo system if you release quick, a skip bonus for jumping over stars, and it…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47728726&quot; title=&quot;I am completely confused about the orbital mechanics in this game.  They seem completely broken; at any rate they do not work remotely like any other simulation I&amp;#39;ve played with (e.g. Gravitation or Kerbal Space Program).  The bodies other than the first body appear to actively deflect the spacecraft away!&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47729796&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s still pretty far physically accurate because there is infinite acceleration the moment a ship reaches the target orbit.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Several commenters were frustrated by the slow restart process and menu navigation, suggesting that the game should allow for immediate retries to maintain momentum &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730201&quot; title=&quot;I would make restarting much much faster than it is now.  That&amp;#39;s the most annoying part and it breaks the satisfying chain completely for me.  I miss and then have to watch it slowly fall, or struggle to find the reset button.  And even if I hit the reset, I have to go through the menu. At the very least, put the reset and play again buttons in the same spot, so I can just keep tapping/clicking there. Super Meat Boy is how all games like this should be.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47731151&quot; title=&quot;Tampermokey userscript -- to launch and restart to give up ```javascript // ==UserScript==     // @name         StarFling Spacebar     // @namespace    https://playstarfling.com/     // @version      2026-04-11     // @description  Spacebar to launch and restart StarFling     // @author       Claude Code     // @match        https://playstarfling.com/*     // @icon         https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?sz=64&amp;amp;domain=playstarfling.com     // @grant        none     // @run-at       document-idle     //…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. This feedback prompted a wave of rapid prototyping, with users utilizing LLMs to create their own &amp;#34;physically accurate&amp;#34; alternatives or modified versions of the game in real-time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47729573&quot; title=&quot;19:50 Put codex and claude (thinking high) to work in parallel to see who could come up with the better physically accurate mindless tapping orbital mechanics sandbox. 20:10 Both codex and claude finish pretty much at the same time, but my kids say claude&amp;#39;s version is more fun. 20:50 Claude runs out of its 5h session limit while finetuning some things, while Codex has 80% left (!). https://coezbek.github.io/orbital-tap/&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732071&quot; title=&quot;I got so annoyed I fixed the annoyances. https://orbitup.surge.sh/ - FPS tweak to fix variable speed  - Can bounce  - Life points instead of sudden death  - Levels  - A few effects  - Better adjusted difficulty&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730029&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a gap, but not due to lack of trying. I made https://github.com/TeMPOraL/cloze-call a little over 16 years ago, and this itself was inspired by something then at least that much old. Screenshot: https://jacek.zlydach.pl/old-blog/download/projects/ClozeCal... Wonder if I can turn this into browser-playable version with just LLMs. EDIT: Put Claude Code on the task (reason for choice: Claude Desktop lets me just throw it at a folder with unzipped bundle of sources and assets I found laying…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.gadgetreview.com/maine-is-about-to-become-the-first-state-to-ban-major-new-data-centers&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Maine is about to become the first state to ban major new data centers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (gadgetreview.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47708817&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;304 points · &lt;strong&gt;433 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by rmason&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maine lawmakers have advanced a first-of-its-kind statewide moratorium on new data centers exceeding 20 megawatts through November 2027 to study the facilities&amp;#39; impact on the electrical grid and rising power costs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.gadgetreview.com/maine-is-about-to-become-the-first-state-to-ban-major-new-data-centers&quot; title=&quot;Maine Is About to Become the First State to Ban Major New Data Centers    Maine advances the nation&amp;#39;s first statewide data center moratorium through 2027, potentially triggering higher AI service costs nationwide.    When you buy through our links, you’re supporting our [mission](https://www.gadgetreview.com/about-us) of fighting fake reviews.    x    ![](https://www.gadgetreview.com/wp-content/uploads/GR_-PNG-Logo-01-1-scaled.png)    menu-11    [![Site…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate over Maine’s data center ban centers on the disparity between their massive resource consumption and minimal local job creation, with critics noting that a planned facility would employ fewer than 30 people compared to thousands at traditional factories &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47709325&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; modern factories are often highly automated and also don&amp;#39;t provide too many local jobs. The factories in Maine employ thousands of people. Bath Iron Works alone has over 7k employees. The Lewiston datacenter that was planned to be built was expected to employ less than 30.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47709755&quot; title=&quot;Bingo. Data centers are a net negative wherever they are. Giant, employ far fewer people than a grocery store after they’re built, crank up electricity costs, use tons of water, air pollution if it’s self-powered, noise pollution (it’s really worth watching Benn Jordan’s video on infrasound,) ugly… the only local entities that win are the landowner and the municipality that collects taxes on them. Though I’ve seen some astonishingly misinformed politicians offering big tax incentives for data…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47709481&quot; title=&quot;The major data centers being built for AI are much more energy-hungry than car manufacturing, and they&amp;#39;re being built at a pace that the US energy grid simply cannot accommodate in the short term... or quite possibly even the long term, considering the US&amp;#39;s extreme aversion to expanding nuclear power. Also, you can call it Luddism if you want, but a car factory is going to bring a lot more net benefit to the average person than an AI data center. Motorized transportation is essential to modern…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents of the ban argue that data centers drive up electricity costs, strain the grid, and offer little utility compared to essential industries like transportation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47709196&quot; title=&quot;For people who support this kind of ban, I&amp;#39;d ask if you would support a similar ban on new factories for, say, car parts. Like data centers, factories use a lot of power -- which drives up electricity bills -- and their construction can have local environmental impacts. Data centers have a reputation for not providing too many local jobs, but modern factories are often highly automated and also don&amp;#39;t provide too many local jobs. If, given all that, you&amp;#39;d support factory construction but not…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47709481&quot; title=&quot;The major data centers being built for AI are much more energy-hungry than car manufacturing, and they&amp;#39;re being built at a pace that the US energy grid simply cannot accommodate in the short term... or quite possibly even the long term, considering the US&amp;#39;s extreme aversion to expanding nuclear power. Also, you can call it Luddism if you want, but a car factory is going to bring a lot more net benefit to the average person than an AI data center. Motorized transportation is essential to modern…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47709085&quot; title=&quot;I live in Maine.  Commercial power is crazy expensive.  I don&amp;#39;t know why you would build an AI datacenter here in the first place. As an obsessive self-hoster, I&amp;#39;ve researched building one, and there is no universe in which it makes sense.  New Hampshire and Massachusetts are so nearby latency-wise.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, some users view the move as &amp;#34;rabid conservation&amp;#34; or NIMBYism that risks turning Maine into a &amp;#34;dead retiree state&amp;#34; by blocking industrial growth and infrastructure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47711332&quot; title=&quot;This is a recipe for creating dead retiree states. Just NIMBY everything, NIMBY the power sources[1] [2], then complain about a lack of power so NIMBY any type of new industrial . Now do this for housing, new sources of water anything a person younger than 40 would need and you basically get a state full of retirees..and oh would you look at that! [3]. Now the question is, why wouldn&amp;#39;t all states eventually do this with the way our population pyramid is looking? It&amp;#39;s basically rabid…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, suggesting that higher taxes or renewable energy mandates would be more productive than an outright ban &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47709224&quot; title=&quot;Why not just require factories /data centers invest in solar/wind/renewables to cover their power usage. Banning is so childish when there is easy solutions.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47709943&quot; title=&quot;Perhaps they are simply not taxed enough to benefit the community. If the local municipality is bearing a lot of these hidden costs, then perhaps the taxes need to be higher and directed at efforts that mitigate the worst of the problems. Water management solutions, air pollution management. Are there ways to mitigate the noise pollution? It seems like they should be taxed /more/ to help offset the negatives. There is surely a way to mitigate the problems. For example, can the noise pollution…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://colaptop.pages.dev/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Old laptops in a colo as low cost servers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (colaptop.pages.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47707477&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;395 points · 244 comments · by argentum47&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CoLaptop offers a €7 monthly service to colocate personal laptops in professional datacenters, providing users with dedicated hardware, an IPv4 address, and setup assistance as a cost-effective and eco-friendly alternative to traditional VPS hosting. &lt;a href=&quot;https://colaptop.pages.dev/&quot; title=&quot;Title: CoLaptop - Personal Laptop Colocation Service    URL Source: https://colaptop.pages.dev/    Markdown Content:  ## Why Your Old Laptop Beats VPS Solutions    Most VPS providers give you severely limited compute resources at premium prices. You even share these resources with other customers without knowing!    Your old laptop packs more CPU power, RAM, and storage than their entry-level offerings - and with us, you&amp;#39;ll pay just €7/month for professional hosting. Why settle for a restricted virtual…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The proposal to colocate old laptops as low-cost servers is met with significant skepticism, with users pointing to a lapsed domain, outdated copyright, and a &amp;#34;sketchy&amp;#34; overall presentation as signs of a potential scam or prank &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47709741&quot; title=&quot;This seems very sketchy. Give us your laptop and we promise we won&amp;#39;t keep it... &amp;gt; © 2024 CoLaptop. All rights reserved. Website copyright is out of date by two years... And the website has been online since then. https://crt.sh/?q=colaptop.pages.dev &amp;gt; Thank you for your interest. Please submit the form below and we&amp;#39;ll get back to you within 2 working days. &amp;gt; - Team @ CoLaptop.com Also colaptop.com is not even registered anymore. If I had to guess the pages.dev site stayed up but the domain and…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47709761&quot; title=&quot;The premise was kinda dumb, wouldn&amp;#39;t be surprised if its just a scam.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47709808&quot; title=&quot;More likely a prank.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that laptops offer more raw power than entry-level VPS offerings for a similar price &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47709599&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Your old laptop packs more CPU power, RAM, and storage than their entry-level offerings - and with us, you&amp;#39;ll pay just €7/month for professional hosting This is basically the same price as the cheapest options on Hetzner: https://snipboard.io/C9epWo.jpg . Sure my old laptop does have more RAM and a bigger SSD, but I bet it&amp;#39;s also less reliable than Hetzner&amp;#39;s servers, and is likely to suddenly die some day. So is the tradeoff really worth it? It&amp;#39;s hard for me to believe that this is a genuine…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47712894&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; ...no remote management interface... I bet colos will plug a KVM into your hardware and give you remote access to that KVM. I also bet rachelbythebay has at least one article that talks about the topic. &amp;gt; ...can&amp;#39;t scale if you suddenly had a surge of traffic. 1) If your public server serves entirely or nearly-entirely static data, you&amp;#39;re going to saturate your network before you saturate the CPU resources on that laptop. 2) Even if it isn&amp;#39;t, computers are way faster than folks give them…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, critics contend that the lack of hardware reliability and scalability makes them unsuitable for production compared to professional cloud providers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47712592&quot; title=&quot;Yeah but for $6/mo you can get a tiny linode or digital ocean droplet, and not worry about hardware failing.  It&amp;#39;s true that a laptop probably has more resources than the smallest VMs, but no remote management interface and can&amp;#39;t scale  if you suddenly had a surge of traffic.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47709599&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Your old laptop packs more CPU power, RAM, and storage than their entry-level offerings - and with us, you&amp;#39;ll pay just €7/month for professional hosting This is basically the same price as the cheapest options on Hetzner: https://snipboard.io/C9epWo.jpg . Sure my old laptop does have more RAM and a bigger SSD, but I bet it&amp;#39;s also less reliable than Hetzner&amp;#39;s servers, and is likely to suddenly die some day. So is the tradeoff really worth it? It&amp;#39;s hard for me to believe that this is a genuine…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47710673&quot; title=&quot;Old laptops as low cost servers? Absolutely, build a homelab in your own basement, rent a cheap VPS, set up wireguard and viola - instant data center for tens of dollars per month. It&amp;#39;s not production grade but you&amp;#39;ll learn a ton. But colocation? Strip away the learning component and add production uptime requirements - why would you even consider using crusty old laptops for this? If you have production grade needs, look to a standard cloud provider or, at the very least, a colo facility where…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these concerns, some users find the concept viable for non-critical hobbyist projects, noting that some data centers already have policies for such hardware and may provide KVM-over-IP for remote management &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47710783&quot; title=&quot;1) You don&amp;#39;t have to keep copyrights up to date (and in fact you don&amp;#39;t have to put them at all), 2) Every single startup i&amp;#39;ve seen on HN is sketchy af. Racking laptops in a cage at a Hetzner DC is probably the least sketchy product i&amp;#39;ve seen here. And honestly, not a terrible idea, I have old laptops that would work as a VPS. $7/month for somebody to host a public server for me, and not on my crappy residential isp? All I have to lose is an old laptop I haven&amp;#39;t touched in 5 years? Sign me up…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47711386&quot; title=&quot;I think it&amp;#39;s most likely testing the waters for a real offering.  It&amp;#39;s not that weird.  Many colo data centers already have policies about hosting laptops because it&amp;#39;s already something that happens.  It just isn&amp;#39;t common and usually isn&amp;#39;t for hosting servers.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47713218&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; ...no remote management interface... &amp;gt; I bet colos will plug a KVM into your hardware and give you remote access to that KVM. From the https://www.colaptop.com landing page: &amp;#39;Free KVM-over-IP access to your laptop - just like having it right next to you.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lzon.ca/posts/other/microsoft-user-abuse/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft is employing dark patterns to goad users into paying for storage?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lzon.ca)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47710149&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;391 points · 244 comments · by jpmitchell&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft is reportedly using dark patterns by automatically syncing local Windows files to OneDrive, filling free storage limits and blocking users from receiving emails until they delete personal data or pay for a subscription. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lzon.ca/posts/other/microsoft-user-abuse/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Lzon.ca. A personal blog, by a programmer and IT expert.    URL Source: https://lzon.ca/posts/other/microsoft-user-abuse/    Markdown Content:  I’d like to tell the story of job I just completed for a customer, so that I can make a point about how I feel Microsoft and other large technology companies are actively hostile to their users.    * * *    ### The Story    ![Image 1: An error message similar to what my customer would have…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that Microsoft and Google use deceptive &amp;#34;dark patterns&amp;#34; by silently enabling cloud backups that consume shared storage limits, effectively disabling user email accounts until they pay for upgrades &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47710853&quot; title=&quot;Google is no better. My family mostly uses iPhones, and on a big extended family vacation, I suggested we use Google Photos to create a shared album to document the trip. Everyone installed the Google Photos app on their iPhone so they could contribute... which resulted in all of them having their email accounts disabled . What happened? Google Photos on the iPhone backs up all your photos by default, and, like Microsoft, Google &amp;#39;shares storage&amp;#39; between email and photos. The minute Google…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47710737&quot; title=&quot;RE &amp;#39;...Cloud Storage not enabled by Default ...&amp;#39; The issue is that Microsoft is moving users files to its cloud with out explaining to people CLEARLY what is happening.  And getting their customers agreement.  And this deception, in MY OPINION is obviously by design , meant to grow their cloud storage revenue thru upgrade offers If Microsoft was doing it properly, it would be CLEARLY explained to customer what was to happen and getting their agreement. to store files in cloud. Having used…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users suggest migrating to Linux distributions like Mint to avoid this &amp;#34;nagware,&amp;#34; others contend that Linux remains too difficult for non-technical users and lacks essential software compatibility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47710932&quot; title=&quot;From perusing reddit, I see some Windows users tempted to consider Linux, often because of Windows 11. But then, many of them won&amp;#39;t move because: it doesn&amp;#39;t work just like Windows; there is some Windows application they must have, or maybe they just don&amp;#39;t want to learn the alternatives. Or they use word/excel/powerpoint and have to interact with others who do also. The brainwashing, high tolerance for pain and misery (and expense!), and lock-in makes it close to impossible for ordinary computer…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47711181&quot; title=&quot;Linux Mint is super easy to use. I&amp;#39;ve personally battle tested it with my elder parents. Given all the nagware present in Windows 11, I&amp;#39;d even say Linux Mint is easier than Windows. The most difficult part is probably the installation itself.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47711252&quot; title=&quot;Not if you are coming from windows and are not a tech nerd. I don’t want to end up being tech support for some non techie I coerced into Linux. It is nowhere near as seamless as zealots like to believe. Been having this discussion since 1997.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, users report technical frustrations with these services, such as the inability to reliably download bulk files from web interfaces or receiving persistent &amp;#34;storage full&amp;#34; notifications even after deleting all data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47710826&quot; title=&quot;I got caught out by exactly this, and I&amp;#39;m not exactly tech illiterate. what made it even more annoying is by the time I&amp;#39;d realised what had happened, it was practically impossible to get the files back out of OneDrive (since I decided that this was enough Windows for me, and went back to Linux), since the webui does NOT handle downloading lots of small files well, and you just end up getting a partially complete zip file. I gave up in the end as nothing in there was particularly important. This…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47710860&quot; title=&quot;Oh and another fun thing! I eventually just emptied the OneDrive so Microsoft would stop bothering me. This was maybe six months ago or so. Microsoft confirms I am storing nothing there. Just a week or two ago I got yet another email begging for money because my OneDrive was apparently full. It was a genuine email, I went as far as checking the headers for SPF/DKIM. When I signed into onedrive, still empty!&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://braw.dev/blog/2026-04-06-reallocating-100-month-claude-spend/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Reallocating $100/Month Claude Code Spend to Zed and OpenRouter&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (braw.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47700972&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;347 points · 233 comments · by kisamoto&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To avoid restrictive usage limits, the author is reallocating a $100 monthly Claude budget to the Zed editor and OpenRouter, allowing for pay-as-you-go API access, credit rollovers, and the flexibility to use various AI models within different agent harnesses. &lt;a href=&quot;https://braw.dev/blog/2026-04-06-reallocating-100-month-claude-spend/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Reallocating $100/Month Claude Code spend to Zed and OpenRouter    URL Source: https://braw.dev/blog/2026-04-06-reallocating-100-month-claude-spend/    Published Time: 2026-04-06T12:40:28+02:00    Markdown Content:  # Reallocating $100/Month Claude Code spend to Zed and OpenRouter – Braw.dev  [Skip to content](https://braw.dev/blog/2026-04-06-reallocating-100-month-claude-spend/#content)    [Braw.dev](https://braw.dev/)[Blog](https://braw.dev/blog)[Tags](https://braw.dev/tags)    CTRL…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the trade-offs between flat-rate subscriptions and pay-as-you-go API usage, with some users arguing that a $100 Claude Code subscription offers significantly more value for heavy users than per-token billing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47705506&quot; title=&quot;I think you are kidding if you think you are going to be remotely approximately the quantity/quality of output you get from a $100/max sub with Zed/Openrouter. I easily get $1K+ of usage out of my $100 max sub. And that&amp;#39;s with Opus 4.6 on high thinking.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701916&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think there&amp;#39;s currently better value than Github&amp;#39;s $40 plan which gives you access to GPT5 &amp;amp; Claude variants. It&amp;#39;s pay per request so not ideal for back-and-forth but great for building complex features on the cheap compared to paying per token. Because GH is accessing the API behind the scenes, you should face less degradation when using Sonnet/Opus models compared to a Claude subscription. Keep a ChatGPT $20 subscription alongside for back-and-forth conversations and you&amp;#39;ll get great…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents of OpenRouter highlight its convenience for model comparison, privacy from providers, and simplified billing, though others suggest self-hosting LiteLLM to achieve similar results without the middleman fee &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701881&quot; title=&quot;People may feel differently about the fee that OpenRouter takes, but I think the service they provide is worth the extra cost. Having access to dozens of models through a single API key, tracking cost of each request, being able to run the same request on different models and comparing their results next to each other, separating usages through different API keys, adding your own presets, setting your routing rules... And once you start using an account with multiple users, it&amp;#39;s even more…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47703629&quot; title=&quot;I agree with you in certain circumstances, but not really for internal user inference. OpenRouter is great if you need to maintain uptime, but for basic usage (chat/coding/self-agents) you can do all of what you mentioned and more with a LiteLLM instance. The number of companies that send a bill is rarely a concern when it comes to “is work getting done”, but I agree with you that minimizing user friction is best. For general use, I personally don’t see much justification as to why I would want…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47705374&quot; title=&quot;The two things I like about OpenRouter: 1. The LLM provider doesn&amp;#39;t know it&amp;#39;s you (unless you have personally identifiable information in your queries). If N people are accessing GPT-5.x using OpenRouter, OpenAI can&amp;#39;t distinguish the people. It doesn&amp;#39;t know if 1 person made all those requests, or N. 2. The ability to ensure your traffic is routed only to providers that claim not to log your inputs (not even for security purposes): https://openrouter.ai/docs/guides/routing/provider-selection...…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Meanwhile, the transition to tools like Zed is met with mixed reviews, as users praise its speed but criticize &amp;#34;papercuts&amp;#34; like high memory usage and missing quality-of-life features compared to VS Code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701977&quot; title=&quot;On the topic of Zed itself as a VSCode replacement - my experience is mixed. I loved it at first, but with time the papercuts add up. The responsiveness difference isn&amp;#39;t that big on my system, but Zed&amp;#39;s memory usage (with the TS language server in particular) is scandalous. As far as DX goes it&amp;#39;s probably at 85% of the level VSCode provides, but in this space QoL features matter a lot. Oh, and it still can&amp;#39;t render emojis in buffers on Linux...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://freebsdfoundation.github.io/freebsd-laptop-testing/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Top laptops to use with FreeBSD&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (freebsdfoundation.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701148&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;333 points · 193 comments · by fork-bomber&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FreeBSD Foundation has released a compatibility matrix scoring laptops based on how well their hardware components, such as graphics and networking, are auto-detected and functional under the operating system. &lt;a href=&quot;https://freebsdfoundation.github.io/freebsd-laptop-testing/&quot; title=&quot;Title: FreeBSD Laptop Compatibility    URL Source: https://freebsdfoundation.github.io/freebsd-laptop-testing/    Published Time: Thu, 09 Apr 2026 18:53:54 GMT    Markdown Content:  # FreeBSD Laptop Compatibility    ![Image 1: FreeBSD Logo](https://wiki.freebsd.org/logo-full-thumb.png)  # Laptop Compatibility    ### Top Laptops for use with FreeBSD    Each laptop is scored based on an aggregate of:    *   how many laptop components are detected, where each fully auto-detected component adds a point  *   whether…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a sharp divide between FreeBSD enthusiasts who appreciate curated hardware lists and critics who argue that the community suffers from a &amp;#34;reality distortion effect&amp;#34; regarding hardware support &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47703825&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s crazy how much negativity there is in comment threads like this. I would get it if FreeBSD was a product you paid for, or someone was evangelizing about how you&amp;#39;re missing out if you don&amp;#39;t get the FreeBSD laptop experience, or something. As someone who liked FreeBSD in the past and curious to check it out again, I&amp;#39;m glad to have this handy list.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47704037&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;It&amp;#39;s crazy how much negativity there is in comment threads like this I think it&amp;#39;s because this chart continues a trend I&amp;#39;ve noticed with BSD zealots.  Namely, there&amp;#39;s some sort of reality distortion effect at play. Consider that there are obvious bullshit scores on TFA, like giving a laptop 9/10 when the fucking wifi doesn&amp;#39;t work.  In reality, this should be 5/10 or arguably 0/10.  After all, what use is a laptop without wifi?  If my laptop&amp;#39;s wifi didn&amp;#39;t work I wouldn&amp;#39;t just buy a usb-ethernet…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. A major point of contention is the scoring system, where laptops are rated highly (9/10) despite lacking functional Wi-Fi, a flaw many users consider a total dealbreaker for a portable device &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47704037&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;It&amp;#39;s crazy how much negativity there is in comment threads like this I think it&amp;#39;s because this chart continues a trend I&amp;#39;ve noticed with BSD zealots.  Namely, there&amp;#39;s some sort of reality distortion effect at play. Consider that there are obvious bullshit scores on TFA, like giving a laptop 9/10 when the fucking wifi doesn&amp;#39;t work.  In reality, this should be 5/10 or arguably 0/10.  After all, what use is a laptop without wifi?  If my laptop&amp;#39;s wifi didn&amp;#39;t work I wouldn&amp;#39;t just buy a usb-ethernet…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47703401&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; 9/10 &amp;gt; half of networking doesnt work, and it&amp;#39;s the more important one for laptop(wifi) I think they need to revise the scoring&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47704444&quot; title=&quot;From the link: &amp;#39;Note: The inbuilt WiFi chip is not natively supported by FreeBSD, so you will need to (temporarily) use a USB WiFi or Ethernet dongle, or (as I will explain) copy some files from a different system to the Macbook. You could also just transplant a different chip into the system.&amp;#39; You say &amp;#39;works perfectly&amp;#39;. I do not think it means what you think it means. To be fair, Linux also has trouble with the Broadcom chip, the driver needs to be installed as a separate step on most distros.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest &amp;#34;unhinged&amp;#34; workarounds like running Linux in a virtual machine to tunnel Wi-Fi &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47703990&quot; title=&quot;It seems like the best way to get WiFi working in FreeBSD is to run Linux in bhyve and tunnel your connections through there.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47704312&quot; title=&quot;the fact that this is a widely accepted/encouraged practice is genuinely unhinged&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others lament that hardware manufacturers now prioritize Linux and Windows to the exclusion of all other operating systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47705568&quot; title=&quot;What is sad is that even though Linux now has hardware support that is miles ahead of Windows, we&amp;#39;ve exchanged one problem with another, because nowadays most of the hardware I see is only supported on Linux and nothing else. Even on PCs, latest generation AMD graphics cards (already &amp;gt;1yr old) are not supported in _anything_ other than Linux (and Windows). This is just sad.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://astral.sh/blog/open-source-security-at-astral&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Open source security at Astral&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (astral.sh)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47699181&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;365 points · 109 comments · by vinhnx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Astral has detailed its open-source security strategy, which includes hardening GitHub Actions through commit-pinning, enforcing strict organizational access controls, utilizing Trusted Publishing for releases, and implementing dependency cooldowns to mitigate supply chain attacks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://astral.sh/blog/open-source-security-at-astral&quot; title=&quot;Open source security at Astral    Insights and guidance from our engineering team on how Astral secures its tools.    * Products  * Docs  * [Blog](/blog)  * [Company](/about)    [Get Started](https://github.com/astral-sh)    G    [Back to blog](/blog)    April  8,  2026    # Open source security at Astral    ![Profile picture of William Woodruff](data:image/gif;base64...)![Profile picture of William Woodruff](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Favatars.githubusercontent.com%2Fu%2F3059210&amp;amp;w=3840&amp;amp;q=75)    ##### William…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a tension between volunteer-led security efforts and corporate interests, with some arguing that permissive licenses allow large corporations to profit from free labor without contributing back &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47700689&quot; title=&quot;The only binaries of uv in the world you can get that were full source bootstrapped from signed package commits to signed reviews to multi-signed deterministic artifacts are the ones from my teammates and I at stagex. All keys on geodistributed smartcards held by maintainers tied to a web of trust going back 25 years with over 5000 keys. https://stagex.tools/packages/core/uv/ Though thankful for clients that let individual maintainers work on stagex part time once in a while, we have had one…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701128&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Why is it a bunch of mostly unpaid volunteer hackers are putting more effort into supply chain security than OpenAI. Unpaid volunteer hackers provide their work for free under licenses designed for the purpose of allowing companies like OpenAI to use their work without paying or contributing in any form. OpenAI wants to make the most money. Why would they spend any time or money on something they can get for free?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47701329&quot; title=&quot;Yep. Permissive licenses, &amp;#39;open source&amp;#39;, it&amp;#39;s all just free work for the worst corporations you can think.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest the AGPLv3 as a solution to corporate exploitation, others question its effectiveness and defend the inherent value of open-source work &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47702766&quot; title=&quot;Seems like the most cynical take on OSS possible. Like anything good you do an evil person could benefit from - is the solution to never do any good?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47702845&quot; title=&quot;The solution is to use AGPLv3.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47704030&quot; title=&quot;I’m maybe daft but AGPLv3 doesnt prevent $Evilcorp from using it, they just need to share any modifications or forks they made?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical debate centers on the efficacy of &amp;#34;web of trust&amp;#34; models versus official signed artifacts, with critics questioning the threat model of third-party builds and suggesting that existing tools like Nix or Guix already address these supply-chain concerns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47700689&quot; title=&quot;The only binaries of uv in the world you can get that were full source bootstrapped from signed package commits to signed reviews to multi-signed deterministic artifacts are the ones from my teammates and I at stagex. All keys on geodistributed smartcards held by maintainers tied to a web of trust going back 25 years with over 5000 keys. https://stagex.tools/packages/core/uv/ Though thankful for clients that let individual maintainers work on stagex part time once in a while, we have had one…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47703565&quot; title=&quot;(I’m the author of TFA.) &amp;gt; All keys on geodistributed smartcards held by maintainers tied to a web of trust going back 25 years with over 5000 keys. Neither the age nor the cardinality of the key graph tells me anything if I don’t trust the maintainers themselves; given that you’re fundamentally providing third-party builds, what’s the threat model you’re addressing? It’s worth nothing that all builds of uv come from a locked resolution and, as mentioned in TFA, you can get signed artifacts…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47700068&quot; title=&quot;Lengths people will go to rediscover Nix/Guix is beyond me&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://german.millermanschool.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Am I German or Autistic?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (german.millermanschool.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47703072&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;246 points · 213 comments · by doener&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Millerman School has released a 15-question diagnostic quiz that humorously explores the overlap between German cultural traits and autistic tendencies, such as systematic thinking and a preference for precision, to promote its philosophical tutoring and resources. &lt;a href=&quot;https://german.millermanschool.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Am I German or Autistic?    URL Source: https://german.millermanschool.com/    Markdown Content:  # Am I German or Autistic? | Millerman School  [Millerman School](https://millermanschool.com/)    # Am I German    or Autistic?    Both involve systematic thinking, a preference for precision, and difficulty pretending small talk is acceptable.    The question is which one explains it.    15 questions · 2 minutes · One uncomfortable truth    Begin the Diagnostic    Question 1 of 15    Your…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on a humorous test comparing German cultural traits with autistic behaviors, with several users reporting they were identified as both &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47703432&quot; title=&quot;Didn&amp;#39;t suspect getting both is an option&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47703465&quot; title=&quot;I can verify this. I am autistic and german. The tests also said I am both.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47703489&quot; title=&quot;I am neither, yet the test said I&amp;#39;m both. I guess I need to go to the embassy and start collecting free healthcare benefits for my diagnosis.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters debated the nuances of punctuality, noting that while they feel a personal moral obligation to be on time, they often do not hold others to the same standard &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47703418&quot; title=&quot;Regarding punctuality I miss the option: “A moral obligation from my side, but I don’t care if others arrive late to an appointment with me”&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47703458&quot; title=&quot;To me it lacks the option “moral obligation but only hold accountable people who live alone”&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47703608&quot; title=&quot;I fully agree with this sentiment. I set a high standard for my punctuality but I don&amp;#39;t care if you&amp;#39;re late.   I just silently judge you.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some challenged the stereotype of German efficiency by citing the unreliability of the national railway &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47703715&quot; title=&quot;Having lived in Germany and experienced the wonderful Deutche Bahn, I wouldn&amp;#39;t really associate punctuality with being German.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, while one user shared a lengthy anecdote about how a series of &amp;#34;uncontrollable&amp;#34; mishaps led to them missing a flight &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47703539&quot; title=&quot;Why? Bathroom queues or things like that? I live alone but am almost always late. A few weeks ago I was late to the airport for a flight by a couple of hours. Yesterday I was late to work, I was commuting by car when an officer thought of stopping me and do some checks for around 10-15 minutes. It does feel like I&amp;#39;m cursed or something. It happens way too often, but almost always feels as if it&amp;#39;s completely outside my control. For instance (and maybe this is embarrassing ...), I was late to the…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://chatgpt.com/pricing/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ChatGPT Pro now starts at $100/month&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (chatgpt.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47707253&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;202 points · &lt;strong&gt;221 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by strongpigeon&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI has introduced a new ChatGPT Pro subscription starting at $100 per month, featuring exclusive access to the GPT-5.4 Pro model, significantly higher usage limits, and maximum capabilities for deep research, data analysis, and image generation compared to the Free, Go, and Plus tiers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://chatgpt.com/pricing/&quot; title=&quot;Title: ChatGPT Plans | Free, Go, Plus, Pro, Business, and Enterprise    URL Source: https://chatgpt.com/pricing/    Markdown Content:  # ChatGPT Plans | Free, Go, Plus, Pro, Business, and Enterprise    [](https://chatgpt.com/)    *   [About](https://chatgpt.com/overview/)  *     Features        *   [Agent](https://chatgpt.com/features/agent/)      *   [Apps](https://chatgpt.com/features/apps/)      *   [Atlas](https://chatgpt.com/atlas/)      *   [Codex](https://chatgpt.com/codex/)      *   [Deep…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI’s introduction of a $100/month tier is seen as the end of the subsidized AI era, though some users find GitHub Copilot a more cost-effective alternative for coding &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47707414&quot; title=&quot;The era of subsidization is over, it seems. For my money, on the code side at least, GitHub Copilot on VSCode is still the most cost effective option, 10 bucks for 300 requests gets me all I need, especially when I use OpenAI models which are counted as 1x vs Opus which is 3x. I&amp;#39;ve stopped using all other tools like Claude Code etc.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47707368&quot; title=&quot;The title is misleading. The only thing they seem to have done was add a $100 plan identical to Claude&amp;#39;s, which gives 5x usage of ChatGPT Plus. There is still a $200 plan that gives 20x usage.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While high-end models like GPT-5.4 are praised for superior performance in complex systems programming compared to Claude, the high price point raises concerns about the &amp;#34;democratization&amp;#34; of frontier models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47707494&quot; title=&quot;Very good move. In my experience, for system programming at least, GPT 5.4 xhigh is vastly superior to Claude Opus 4.6 max effort. I ran many brutal tests, including reconstructing for QEMU the SCSI controller (not longer accessible) of a SVSY UNIX of the early 90s used in a 386. Side by side, always re-mirroring the source trees each time one did a breakthrough in the implementation. Well, GPT 5.4 single handed did it all, while Opus continued to take wrong paths. The same for my Redis bug…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47707439&quot; title=&quot;That is not the &amp;#39;only&amp;#39; thing: You get access to GPT-5.4 pro.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Debates persist regarding the utility of AI-generated code; some developers feel &amp;#34;disconnected&amp;#34; and wary of &amp;#34;slop,&amp;#34; while others argue that refusing to use these &amp;#34;power tools&amp;#34; will soon be as impractical as digging holes without construction equipment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47707510&quot; title=&quot;I tried Claude Code for a week straight recently to see what all the hype was about and while it pumped out a bunch of reasonable looking code and features I ended up feeling completely disconnected from my codebase and uncomfortable. Cancelled the plan I had with them and happily went back to just coding like normal in VSCode with occasional dips into Copilot when a need arose or for rubber ducking and planning. Feels much better as I&amp;#39;m in full control and not trusting the magic black box to…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47708572&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t like calling a posture &amp;#39;ignorant&amp;#39; , but I think that&amp;#39;s what we have here. I don&amp;#39;t mean that as an insult. It&amp;#39;s likely you didn&amp;#39;t learn how to use the tool properly, and I&amp;#39;d suggest &amp;#39;trying again&amp;#39; because not using AI soon will be tantamount to digging holes with shovels instead of using construction equipment. Yes, we still need our &amp;#39;core skill&amp;#39;s but, we&amp;#39;re not going to be able to live without the leverage of AI. Yes - AI can generate slop, and probably too many Engineers do that. Yes -…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, some commenters question the ethics of supporting OpenAI, though others suggest the tech industry rarely resists tools based on reputational grounds &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47708223&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s interesting seeing all the ChatGPT users in this thread, knowing what we know about OpenAI. Either they don&amp;#39;t care about what OpenAI does, don&amp;#39;t know their reputation, or feel like their use is too insignificant to matter.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47708285&quot; title=&quot;What has the tech industry ever resisted on moral or reputational grounds?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://charcuterie.elastiq.ch/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Charcuterie – Visual similarity Unicode explorer&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (charcuterie.elastiq.ch)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47709158&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;314 points · 86 comments · by rickcarlino&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Charcuterie is a browser-based visual explorer that uses SigLIP 2 embeddings to help users discover and compare Unicode characters, scripts, and symbols based on their visual similarity. &lt;a href=&quot;https://charcuterie.elastiq.ch/&quot; title=&quot;Charcuterie    A visual explorer for Unicode. Browse characters, discover related glyphs, and explore scripts, symbols, and shapes across the standard.    ✎    Model    SigLIP 2  🔊︎Animations ✔All characters    # Charcuterie    A visual explorer for Unicode. Browse the character set, discover related glyphs, and learn more about the scripts, symbols, and shapes that make up the standard.    To power visual similarity, rendered glyphs are embedded with SigLIP 2 and compared in vector space.    Charcuterie is…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users praised the tool&amp;#39;s delightful design and &amp;#34;radial glyph wave&amp;#34; animation, though some warned that the transitions might become grating for utilitarian use and noted that the interface breaks browser back-button functionality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47716891&quot; title=&quot;Design is delightful, great job. The radial glyph wave animation is also really cool, but the novelty will wear off and the delay will become grating especially if one is using the app in a utilitarian manner. Consider skipping transitions/animations if the user signals a preference for reduced/removed motion. Alternatively, you could add an on-page toggle for animations.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47710516&quot; title=&quot;Very cool concept and execution, well done. I don&amp;#39;t quite understand what is going on with the &amp;#39;spotlight&amp;#39; UI concept - I can click around on the characters and it highlights an area and it also reloads the landscape local to the character that I clicked on, so I can sort of traverse the similarity landscape this way. But I feel like I might be missing some part of the visual metaphor?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47711176&quot; title=&quot;Ouch, my back button&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While the project focuses on visual similarity, commenters observed that the underlying SigLIP 2 model incorporates semantic elements—such as grouping &amp;#34;@&amp;#34; with an envelope—and suggested that &amp;#34;visual-semantic similarity&amp;#34; might be a more accurate description &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47711904&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; visual similarity &amp;gt; SigLIP 2 Maybe visual-semantic similarity is more appropriate? Nonetheless the design is fantastic&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47716934&quot; title=&quot;It would seem it takes in account a bit more than &amp;#39;visual similarity&amp;#39;, otherwise I can&amp;#39;t find a good reason for &amp;#39;@&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;U+1F582 (BACK OF ENVELOPE)&amp;#39; being that close. Also, for years (decades?!) I wanted something similar in Word, for when I knew how to describe the symbol in words, but had a hard time manually searching for in the unwieldly UI. I can&amp;#39;t believe that &amp;#39;insert symbol&amp;#39; window still doesn&amp;#39;t have any kind of search capability.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical feedback included a request to allow searches for space characters and a discussion on the name &amp;#34;Charcuterie,&amp;#34; which carries negative connotations of messy butchery or poor surgery in French &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47713708&quot; title=&quot;The name sounds really bad in French. Charcuterie is a pig butchering shop, usually associated with messy bloody stuff. The verb “charcuter” also refers to surgery done poorly. But yeah I guess the pun makes it work in english&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47714548&quot; title=&quot;I understand trimming input fields is typically a useful default, but in this case this prevents me from searching for a space. So maybe it&amp;#39;d be worthwhile to add a `if (trim(str)==&amp;#39;&amp;#39;) return str` exception or something similar?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jTGbKKGqs5EdyYoRc/most-people-can-t-juggle-one-ball&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Most people can&amp;#39;t juggle one ball&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lesswrong.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47702887&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;300 points · 93 comments · by surprisetalk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This comprehensive guide outlines the technical progression of juggling from one to seven balls, offering step-by-step instructions on proper form, common mistakes to avoid, and an introduction to the mathematical notation known as siteswap. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jTGbKKGqs5EdyYoRc/most-people-can-t-juggle-one-ball&quot; title=&quot;Most people can&amp;#39;t juggle one ball — LessWrong    TLDR: A complete guide to juggling, from zero to siteswap notation, by someone who juggles in nightclubs. …    x    This website requires javascript to properly function. Consider activating javascript to get access to all site functionality.    ## [LESSWRONG](/)    ## [LW](/)    Login    Most people can&amp;#39;t juggle one ball — LessWrong    [Practical](/w/practical)[Frontpage](/posts/5conQhfa4rgb4SaWx/site-guide-personal-blogposts-vs-frontpage-posts)    # 38    # [Most…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Experienced jugglers emphasize that the skill relies less on hand-eye coordination and more on maintaining a consistent, rhythmic toss &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742533&quot; title=&quot;Longtime juggler here. Outside of more complicated tricks like the claw and other specialized patterns, the most common juggling patterns (such as the cascade [1]) don’t rely as much on pure handeye coordination as they do on maintaining a consistent, even toss. The key is throwing each ball so it rises and falls in a predictable arc, so it lands approximately in the same spot where your other hand is waiting to catch it. When I teach complete beginners, I actually start with a set of special…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743101&quot; title=&quot;I tried and failed to learn to juggle three balls many times, I&amp;#39;ve just got terrible coordination. But one day I stood over a bed and just threw them in the air and listened to the rhythm of the &amp;#39;thuds&amp;#39; as the missed balls hit the mattress. As soon as I&amp;#39;d got that down it was like a switch clicked and my hands knew &amp;#39;when&amp;#39; to be ready for the catch, rather than trying to follow the balls to catch them. I never managed four, so mileage may vary with this technique, but it was a very surprising…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest practicing with tennis balls against a wall &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743012&quot; title=&quot;Practice against a wall with tennis balls, it’ll take a day.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that specialized equipment like slow-falling handkerchiefs or dedicated juggling balls prevents the frustration of chasing bouncy objects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742533&quot; title=&quot;Longtime juggler here. Outside of more complicated tricks like the claw and other specialized patterns, the most common juggling patterns (such as the cascade [1]) don’t rely as much on pure handeye coordination as they do on maintaining a consistent, even toss. The key is throwing each ball so it rises and falls in a predictable arc, so it lands approximately in the same spot where your other hand is waiting to catch it. When I teach complete beginners, I actually start with a set of special…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743189&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t recommend tennis balls for a beginner: they bounce everywhere, and you&amp;#39;ll spend most of your time chasing the balls rather than juggling. Cheap juggling balls are around 10$.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. A notable consensus among practitioners is that juggling exhibits strong muscle memory, allowing even casual learners to retain the skill after years of inactivity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742770&quot; title=&quot;I taught myself in junior high to juggle three balls with two hands and two balls with one hand. It&amp;#39;s not a huge accomplishment but what amazes me is that I can go years without trying it and when an opportunity comes up I can just do it again, within just a couple of tries. Those neuronal connections just never go away.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://akshaychugh.xyz/writings/png/vercel-plugin-telemetry&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Vercel plugin on Claude Code wants to read your prompts&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (akshaychugh.xyz)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47704881&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;274 points · 111 comments · by akshay2603&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Vercel plugin for Claude Code uses prompt injection to request access to user prompts and automatically collects full bash command strings across all projects, regardless of whether they use Vercel. This telemetry runs by default without project-based gating or clear disclosure that command logging is optional. &lt;a href=&quot;https://akshaychugh.xyz/writings/png/vercel-plugin-telemetry&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Vercel Plugin on Claude Code wants to read all your prompts!    URL Source: https://akshaychugh.xyz/writings/png/vercel-plugin-telemetry    Published Time: 2026-04-09T00:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  09 Apr 2026    I was working on a project that has nothing to do with Vercel. No `vercel.json`, no `next.config`, no Vercel dependencies. Nothing.    And then this popped up:    ![Image 1: Telemetry consent question rendered in Claude…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Vercel plugin for Claude Code has drawn criticism for injecting &amp;#34;skills&amp;#34; into every session regardless of project scope, resulting in a fixed ~19k token cost and the piping of bash commands to the plugin &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47705294&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; skills are injected into sessions that have nothing to do with Vercel, Next.js, or this plugin&amp;#39;s scope &amp;gt; every skill&amp;#39;s trigger rules get evaluated on every prompt and every tool call in every repo, regardless of whether Vercel is in scope &amp;gt; For users working across multiple projects (some Vercel, some not), this is a fixed ~19k token cost on every session — even when the session is pure backend work, data science, or non-Vercel frontend. I know everything is vibeslopped nowadays, but how does…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706385&quot; title=&quot;Engineer at Vercel here who worked on the plugin! We have been super heads down to the initial versions of the plugin and constantly improving it. Always super happy to hear feedback and track the changes on GitHub.  I want to address the notes here: The plugin is always on, once installed on an agent harness. We do not want to limit to only detected Vecel project, because we also want to help with greenfield projects &amp;#39;Help build me an AI chat app&amp;#39;. We collect the native tool calls and bash…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. A Vercel engineer defended the design as necessary for supporting &amp;#34;greenfield&amp;#34; projects and blamed the prompt injection approach on limitations within Claude Code&amp;#39;s current plugin architecture &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706385&quot; title=&quot;Engineer at Vercel here who worked on the plugin! We have been super heads down to the initial versions of the plugin and constantly improving it. Always super happy to hear feedback and track the changes on GitHub.  I want to address the notes here: The plugin is always on, once installed on an agent harness. We do not want to limit to only detected Vecel project, because we also want to help with greenfield projects &amp;#39;Help build me an AI chat app&amp;#39;. We collect the native tool calls and bash…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users attribute these issues to poor engineering practices, others argue the data collection is an intentional breach of trust that violates Anthropic&amp;#39;s plugin policies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47705294&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; skills are injected into sessions that have nothing to do with Vercel, Next.js, or this plugin&amp;#39;s scope &amp;gt; every skill&amp;#39;s trigger rules get evaluated on every prompt and every tool call in every repo, regardless of whether Vercel is in scope &amp;gt; For users working across multiple projects (some Vercel, some not), this is a fixed ~19k token cost on every session — even when the session is pure backend work, data science, or non-Vercel frontend. I know everything is vibeslopped nowadays, but how does…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47705441&quot; title=&quot;Your comment assumes the plugin is not working as they want it to. The way it is designed gets them the maximum amount of data. It does a great job if that is their goal.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706131&quot; title=&quot;The breach of trust here, which is hard to imagine isn&amp;#39;t intentional, is enough reason alone to stop using Vercel, and uninstall the plugin. That part is easy. Most of these agents can help you migrate if anything. The question is on whether these platforms are going to enforce their policies for plugins. For Claude Code in particular this behavior violates their plugin policy (1D) here explicitly: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/13145358-anthropic-so... It&amp;#39;s a really tough problem, but…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Skepticism remains high regarding Vercel&amp;#39;s claims of anonymity, with critics noting that piping full bash commands can easily expose sensitive information despite the use of random UUIDs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706385&quot; title=&quot;Engineer at Vercel here who worked on the plugin! We have been super heads down to the initial versions of the plugin and constantly improving it. Always super happy to hear feedback and track the changes on GitHub.  I want to address the notes here: The plugin is always on, once installed on an agent harness. We do not want to limit to only detected Vecel project, because we also want to help with greenfield projects &amp;#39;Help build me an AI chat app&amp;#39;. We collect the native tool calls and bash…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706452&quot; title=&quot;The idea that a random uuid == anonymous, and would protect users from having entire bash commands piped through is preposterous, and you know it.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-04-08</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-04-08</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://piechowski.io/post/git-commands-before-reading-code/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Git commands I run before reading any code&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (piechowski.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47687273&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2308 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 499 comments · by grepsedawk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author outlines five Git commands to diagnose a codebase&amp;#39;s health by identifying high-churn files, contributor bus factors, bug clusters, development velocity, and the frequency of emergency hotfixes before reading any actual code. &lt;a href=&quot;https://piechowski.io/post/git-commands-before-reading-code/&quot; title=&quot;Title: &amp;#39;The Git Commands I Run Before Reading Any Code&amp;#39;    URL Source: https://piechowski.io/post/git-commands-before-reading-code/    Published Time: &amp;#39;2026-04-08T08:30:00Z&amp;#39;    Markdown Content:  # The Git Commands I Run Before Reading Any Code  [](https://piechowski.io/)[Work With Me](https://piechowski.io/work-with-me)[Github](https://github.com/grepsedawk)[Blog](https://piechowski.io/post)  # The Git Commands I Run Before Reading Any Code    Five git commands that tell you where a codebase hurts before…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the utility of analyzing Git history, with many users debating the merits of squash-merging versus maintaining a granular commit history to preserve context &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47688176&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If the team squashes every PR into a single commit, this output reflects who merged, not who wrote. Squash-merge workflows are stupid (you lose information without gaining anything in return as it was easily filterable at retrieval anyway) and only useful as a workaround for people not knowing how to use git, but git stores the author and committer names separately, so it doesn&amp;#39;t matter who merged, but rather whether the squashed patchset consisted of commits with multiple authors (and even…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47688264&quot; title=&quot;Can you explain to me (an avid squash-merger) what extra information do you gain by having commits that say &amp;#39;argh, let&amp;#39;s see if this works&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;crap, the CI is failing again, small fix to see if it works&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;pushing before leaving for vacation&amp;#39; in the main git history? With a squash merge one PR is one commit, simple, clean and easy to roll back or cherry-pick to another branch.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47688355&quot; title=&quot;These commits reaching the reviewer are a sign of either not knowing how to use git or not respecting their time. You clean things up and split into logical chunks when you get ready to push into a shared place.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that poor commit messages and complex Git syntax make these analytical commands difficult to use or remember &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47689190&quot; title=&quot;I love how the author thinks developers write commit messages. All joking aside, it really is a chronic problem in the corporate world. Most codebases I encounter just have &amp;#39;changed stuff&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;hope this works now&amp;#39;. It&amp;#39;s a small minority of developers  (myself included) who consider the git commit log to be important enough to spend time writing something meaningful. AI generated commit messages helps this a lot, if developers would actually use it (I hope they will).&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47689151&quot; title=&quot;I don’t understand how people can remember all these custom scripting languages. I can’t even remember most git flags, I’m ecstatic when I remember how to iterate over arrays in “jq”, I can’t fathom how people remember these types of syntaxes.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47689697&quot; title=&quot;I am convinced that the vast majority of professionals simply don&amp;#39;t bother to remember and, ESPECIALLY WITH GIT, just look stuff up every single time the workflow deviates from their daily usage. At this point perhaps a million person-years have been sacrificed to the semantically incoherent shit UX of git. I have loathed git from the beginning but there&amp;#39;s effectively no other choice. That said, the OP&amp;#39;s commands are useful, I am copying them (because obviously I won&amp;#39;t ever memorize them).&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest that strong leadership can enforce better documentation standards &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47689631&quot; title=&quot;This is a team lead/CTO problem. A good leader will be explicit in their expectations that developers write good commit messages. I&amp;#39;ve certainly had good leaders that expect this.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the thread explores alternative version control tools like Jujutsu, though some find its programmatic syntax more complex than Git&amp;#39;s established, albeit &amp;#34;incoherent,&amp;#34; interface &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47688065&quot; title=&quot;Jujutsu equivalents, if anyone is curious: What Changes the Most jj log --no-graph -r &amp;#39;ancestors(trunk()) &amp;amp; committer_date(after:&amp;#39;1 year ago&amp;#39;)&amp;#39; \        -T &amp;#39;self.diff().files().map(|f| f.path() ++ &amp;#39;\n&amp;#39;).join(&amp;#39;&amp;#39;)&amp;#39; \        | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr | head -20 Who Built This jj log --no-graph -r &amp;#39;ancestors(trunk()) &amp;amp; ~merges()&amp;#39; \        -T &amp;#39;self.author().name() ++ &amp;#39;\n&amp;#39;&amp;#39; \        | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr Where Do Bugs Cluster jj log --no-graph -r &amp;#39;ancestors(trunk()) &amp;amp;…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47688114&quot; title=&quot;To me, it makes jujutsu look like the Nix of VCSes. Not meaning to offend anyone: Nix is cool, but adds complexity. And as a disclaimer: I used jujutsu for a few months and went back to git. Mostly because git is wired in my fingers, and git is everywhere. Those examples of what jujutsu can do and not git sound nice, but in those few months I never remotely had a need for them, so it felt overkill for me.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bryankeller.github.io/2026/04/08/porting-mac-os-x-nintendo-wii.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I ported Mac OS X to the Nintendo Wii&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bryankeller.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47691730&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1912 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 327 comments · by blkhp19&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Developer Bryan Keller successfully ported Mac OS X 10.0 (Cheetah) to the Nintendo Wii by developing a custom bootloader, patching the XNU kernel, and writing specialized IOKit drivers for the console&amp;#39;s unique hardware and USB architecture. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bryankeller.github.io/2026/04/08/porting-mac-os-x-nintendo-wii.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Porting Mac OS X to the Nintendo Wii    URL Source: https://bryankeller.github.io/2026/04/08/porting-mac-os-x-nintendo-wii.html    Published Time: 2026-04-08T00:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Porting Mac OS X to the Nintendo Wii | Bryan Keller’s Dev Blog    [Bryan Keller&amp;#39;s Dev Blog](https://bryankeller.github.io/)    # Porting Mac OS X to the Nintendo Wii    [![Image 1: Mac OS X Cheetah running on the Nintendo…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The project was largely motivated by a Reddit comment declaring the port had a &amp;#34;zero percent chance&amp;#34; of happening, sparking a discussion on the psychology of &amp;#34;principled skepticism&amp;#34; and the satisfaction of proving such declarations wrong &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692582&quot; title=&quot;Before figuring out how to tackle this project, I needed to know whether it would even be possible. According to a 2021 Reddit comment:        There is a zero percent chance of this ever happening.      Feeling encouraged, I started with the basics: what hardware is in the Wii, and how does it compare to the hardware used in real Macs from the era. I LOL&amp;#39;d&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47693033&quot; title=&quot;I almost think such projects are worth it just to immortalize comments like these. There&amp;#39;s a whole psychology of wrongness that centers on declaring that not-quite-impossible things will definitely never happen, because it feels like principled skepticism.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692846&quot; title=&quot;Gotta love that particular Redditors follow up comment: &amp;gt;Go ahead and downvote me. I am correct on every single thing I said&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters praised the engineering feat and the quality of the write-up, particularly noting the author&amp;#39;s ability to develop the project from an economy-class airplane seat &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692465&quot; title=&quot;In addition to the incredible engineering work here the OP casually flexes by showing the development happening _in an economy class airplane seat_.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692860&quot; title=&quot;Not only is this an insanely cool project, the writeup is great. I was hooked the whole way through. I particularly love this part: &amp;gt; At this point, the system was trying to find a framebuffer driver so that the Mac OS X GUI could be shown. As indicated in the logs, WindowServer was not happy - to fix this, I’d need to write my own framebuffer driver . I&amp;#39;m surprised by how well abstracted MacOS is (was). The I/O Kit abstraction layers seemed to actually do what they said. A little kudos to the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47694029&quot; title=&quot;Congrats, great project and great writeup.   That would have won MacHack back in the day. Now that the MacBook Neo has an A18, I wonder if you could get MacOS running on an iPhone?  :)&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Technically, users were impressed by the Wii&amp;#39;s ability to run the OS on only 88MB of RAM and the effectiveness of the I/O Kit abstraction layer, which allowed for the creation of a custom framebuffer driver &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692860&quot; title=&quot;Not only is this an insanely cool project, the writeup is great. I was hooked the whole way through. I particularly love this part: &amp;gt; At this point, the system was trying to find a framebuffer driver so that the Mac OS X GUI could be shown. As indicated in the logs, WindowServer was not happy - to fix this, I’d need to write my own framebuffer driver . I&amp;#39;m surprised by how well abstracted MacOS is (was). The I/O Kit abstraction layers seemed to actually do what they said. A little kudos to the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47693073&quot; title=&quot;IOKit was actually built from the ground up for OS X! NeXT had a different driver model called DriverKit. I&amp;#39;ve never coded against either, but my understanding was they&amp;#39;re pretty different beasts. (I could be wrong) That said, indeed, the abstraction layer here is delightful! I know that some NetBSD devs managed to get PPC Darwin running under a Mach/IOKit compatibility layer back in the day, up to running Xquartz on NetBSD! With NetBSD translating IOKit calls. :-)&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695027&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; As for RAM, the Wii has a unique configuration: 88 MB total TIL Wii has only 88MB of RAM. Fortunately games weren&amp;#39;t electron-based.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sourceforge.net/p/veracrypt/discussion/general/thread/9620d7a4b3/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft terminated the account VeraCrypt used to sign Windows drivers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sourceforge.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47686549&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1287 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 500 comments · by super256&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VeraCrypt lead developer Mounir Idrassi reports that Microsoft terminated his account used for signing Windows drivers and bootloaders, temporarily halting Windows updates; however, following community and media pressure, a Microsoft executive has reached out to help resolve the issue. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sourceforge.net/p/veracrypt/discussion/general/thread/9620d7a4b3/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Forums / General Discussion: Project Update    URL Source: https://sourceforge.net/p/veracrypt/discussion/general/thread/9620d7a4b3/    Markdown Content:  # VeraCrypt / Forums / General Discussion: Project Update    *   [Join/Login](https://sourceforge.net/auth/)  *   [Business Software](https://sourceforge.net/software/)  *   [Open Source Software](https://sourceforge.net/directory/)  *   [For Vendors](https://sourceforge.net/software/vendors/ &amp;#39;For Vendors&amp;#39;)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The suspension of developer accounts for critical security projects like VeraCrypt and WireGuard has sparked alarm over Microsoft&amp;#39;s power to block urgent security updates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47687884&quot; title=&quot;This is the same problem I&amp;#39;m currently facing with WireGuard. No warning at all, no notification. One day I sign in to publish an update, and yikes, account suspended. Currently undergoing some sort of 60 days appeals process, but who knows. That&amp;#39;s kind of crazy: what if there were some critical RCE in WireGuard, being exploited in the wild, and I needed to update users immediately? (That&amp;#39;s just hypothetical; don&amp;#39;t freak out!) In that case, Microsoft would have my hands entirely tied. If…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47686971&quot; title=&quot;Microsoft disabled the developer&amp;#39;s certificate so no windows releases can be made.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47687917&quot; title=&quot;Now this is even more alarming! Wireguard&amp;#39;s creator has their Microsoft account suspended... Microsoft doesn&amp;#39;t want to allow software that would allow the user to shield themselves, either by totally encrypting a drive, or by encrypting their network traffic!&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters argue that major tech platforms should be regulated as utilities to prevent arbitrary service denials, especially when no clear reason or human appeal process is provided &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47691488&quot; title=&quot;It has been clear for a while that certain providers and services need to be regulated as utilities - Microsoft, Google, Apple, Visa, Mastercard, and soon Openai and Anthropic. It should be illegal for these companies, just like utilities, to deny service to anyone or any entity in good standing for dues. There is little hope for getting this through in the US where most politicians of any stripe hate the public, and the ones that don&amp;#39;t have hardly any power. But it might be possible to do this…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47687207&quot; title=&quot;As someone who is just planning to publish signed desktop software for Windows, this is deeply worrying. What reasons could there be for cancelling a certificate, especially when it has been used for years and the identity is already established? Are there some ways to combat such decisions legally?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47691549&quot; title=&quot;We need a law that a human representative can be spoken to within 24 hours or directly when something critical happens. Also “there is no appeal possible” should be plain illegal.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see this as a sign that Linux and BSD are the only viable paths for open computing, others note that Linux remains difficult for the general public to adopt &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47688852&quot; title=&quot;Linux is the only hope at this point for the future of computing. Windows and macOS are just too risky to do any business with. Waste of all resources.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47689363&quot; title=&quot;and yet... still unusable by the mass majority of people.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47687291&quot; title=&quot;Looks like Linux and some of the BSDs are the only remaining truly open OSes.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/08/business/bitcoin-satoshi-nakamoto-identity-adam-back.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? My quest to unmask Bitcoin&amp;#39;s creator&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nytimes.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47685320&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;631 points · &lt;strong&gt;834 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by jfirebaugh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A New York Times investigation explores the enduring mystery of Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity, focusing on cryptographer Adam Back as a primary candidate despite his consistent denials. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/08/business/bitcoin-satoshi-nakamoto-identity-adam-back.html&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.is&amp;amp;#x2F;iRBng&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.is&amp;amp;#x2F;iRBng&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The New York Times&amp;#39; attempt to identify Adam Back as Satoshi Nakamoto has been met with skepticism by readers who argue the evidence—ranging from shared vocabulary to a common interest in public-key cryptography—is circumstantial and weak &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47685479&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I’d learned enough by then to know that P.G.P. relies on public-key cryptography. &amp;gt; So does Bitcoin. A Bitcoin user has two keys: a public key, from which an address is derived that acts as a digital safe deposit box; and a private key, which is the secret combination used to unlock that box and spend the coins it contains. &amp;gt; How interesting, I thought, that Mr. Back’s grad-school hobby involved the same cryptographic technique that Satoshi had repurposed. I read up to here, but I wasn&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47686120&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;I read up to here, but I wasn&amp;#39;t convinced that this is the revelation that the author claims The rest of the arguments is as weak: 1) both released open-source software 2) both don&amp;#39;t like spam 3) both like using pseudonyms online 4) both love freedom 5) both are anti-copyright etc. Basically, the author found that Adam Back used the same words on X as Satoshi did in some emails (including such rare words as &amp;#39;dang,&amp;#39; &amp;#39;backup,&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;abandonware&amp;#39;) and then decided to find every possible &amp;#39;link&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47687739&quot; title=&quot;I found this article about as compelling as all the other attempts at identifying him. Half of the cypherpunks (I was pretty active) had the same set of interests in public key cryptography, libertarianism, anonymity, criticism of copyright, and predecessor systems like Chaum&amp;#39;s ecash; we talked about those in virtually every meeting. The most compelling evidence is Adam Back&amp;#39;s body language, as subjectively observed by a reporter who is clearly in love with his own story. The stylometry also…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some find Back&amp;#39;s refusal to share email metadata suspicious &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47689029&quot; title=&quot;The refusal to provide email metadata is the most damning evidence. Adam Back clearly has the emails; he is the one who provided them in the first place during the previous court case. Everyone knows he has the emails. If Adam Back and Satoshi are two different people, the metadata should be exculpatory, and easy to share. There&amp;#39;s literally no reason whatsoever to hide the metadata unless he is the one. In a court of law, self-disclosure of inculpatory information cannot be compelled, so this…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others criticize the investigation as a form of &amp;#34;p-hacking&amp;#34; that ignores how common these traits were among the 1990s cypherpunk community &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47687739&quot; title=&quot;I found this article about as compelling as all the other attempts at identifying him. Half of the cypherpunks (I was pretty active) had the same set of interests in public key cryptography, libertarianism, anonymity, criticism of copyright, and predecessor systems like Chaum&amp;#39;s ecash; we talked about those in virtually every meeting. The most compelling evidence is Adam Back&amp;#39;s body language, as subjectively observed by a reporter who is clearly in love with his own story. The stylometry also…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47696909&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Water, a drink consumed by nobel price winners and European kings...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, commenters raised significant ethical concerns, arguing that &amp;#34;unmasking&amp;#34; Satoshi crosses the line into dangerous doxxing that places a massive target on an individual for no clear public good &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47699182&quot; title=&quot;Simple question for anyone who’s familiar with this world of journalism: how does the author and the NYTimes cope with the fact that making such claims paint a huge target on the person they claim to have “unmasked”? Satoshi’s wallets are worth hundreds of millions of dollars, and there have been kidnappings/torture/murders for much less than that. Do they just not care about the ethical implications? And really, for what? What is gained by “unmasking” Satoshi other than satisfying one’s…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47697957&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Pretty compelling story. Not necessarily for its revelations, but for the fact that John Carreyrou and the NYT decided to publish it at all. When is the line crossed from journalism into doxxing? Whoever created Bitcoin has a legitimate safety reason to stay anonymous. Anyone suspected of holding that much wealth becomes a target - as does their family.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.skoda-storyboard.com/en/skoda-world/skoda-duobell-a-bicycle-bell-that-outsmarts-even-smart-headphones/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Škoda DuoBell: A bicycle bell that penetrates noise-cancelling headphones&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (skoda-storyboard.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47687248&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;611 points · 599 comments · by ra&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Škoda Auto has developed the DuoBell, a mechanical bicycle bell designed to penetrate active noise-cancelling headphones by using specific frequencies and irregular strikes to improve pedestrian safety. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.skoda-storyboard.com/en/skoda-world/skoda-duobell-a-bicycle-bell-that-outsmarts-even-smart-headphones/&quot; title=&quot;Škoda DuoBell: A bicycle bell that outsmarts even smart headphones - Škoda Storyboard    Pedestrians wearing headphones are exposed to an increased risk of accidents. In an effort to reduce collisions with cyclists, Škoda Auto, in collaboration with scientists, introduces an innovative bicycle bell whose sound can penetrate even active noise cancellation systems. In doing so, it helps prevent injuries to both pedestrians and cyclists.    * [Stories](https://www.skoda-storyboard.com/en/)  * [Media…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Škoda DuoBell, designed to bypass noise-cancelling headphones, is criticized by some as an over-engineered solution to a problem better solved through segregated infrastructure or reduced speeds in shared spaces &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47688068&quot; title=&quot;Do horns and bells really prevent accidents? In order for e.g. a horn to work you need enough time that the driver processes the situation and decides the horn will communicate something AND enough time for the pedestrian or whatever to process that and react to it.  Generally it&amp;#39;s a lot easier just to press the brake, and more importantly be travelling at a speed and in a manner where the brake is sufficient. Structurally, we&amp;#39;d be much better off reducing conflicts between the different tiers…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47687660&quot; title=&quot;Over engineering in real life, solving lack of common sense by introducing a solution where the cyclist is paying. I think the solution is nice for sure, but solving the wrong problem.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47688145&quot; title=&quot;A horn or bell is mostly for telling other people &amp;#39;hey I&amp;#39;m here, stay out of my way and dont suddenly cross into my path&amp;#39; My opinion as a cyclist is that I should basically only be using my bell on pedestrians when the pedestrians are wandering onto the bike lane. If im cycling through a shared space, I find it extremely rude to ring the bell, because it feels like I&amp;#39;m telling people to get out of my way, but they have just as much right to a shared path as I do. Some cyclists ring their bells…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47687883&quot; title=&quot;The real problem is that cyclists and pedestrians apparently in some countries share space commonly enough that this is necessary? In the Netherlands, bicycle utopia, I cannot remember the last time I used my bell to alert a pedestrian of my existence. Granted, I never cycle in Amsterdam, but that is a special location where high-powered ship horns are probably required. Regarding ANC, I naturally turn it off while cycling on my Bose Quiet Comfort II, as the ANC will try (and fail) to cancel…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some cyclists find bells rude or ineffective against sound-proofed modern cars—leading them to install actual car horns or air horns for safety—others argue that a bell remains a vital tool for alerting inattentive pedestrians &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47688145&quot; title=&quot;A horn or bell is mostly for telling other people &amp;#39;hey I&amp;#39;m here, stay out of my way and dont suddenly cross into my path&amp;#39; My opinion as a cyclist is that I should basically only be using my bell on pedestrians when the pedestrians are wandering onto the bike lane. If im cycling through a shared space, I find it extremely rude to ring the bell, because it feels like I&amp;#39;m telling people to get out of my way, but they have just as much right to a shared path as I do. Some cyclists ring their bells…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47689988&quot; title=&quot;Coincidentally, I bought a 12v car horn yesterday with the intent of wiring it into my ebike&amp;#39;s power supply with a little button on my handlebars. Not because of other cyclists or pedestrians wearing (anc) headphones but because modern cars are so heavily sound-proofed they don&amp;#39;t hear a bicycle bell anymore. A recent incident with an inattentive taxi driver in a brand new EV nearly flattening me prompted me to want to pursue this. I&amp;#39;m still waiting for my cheap AliExpress dc-to-dc step down…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47690668&quot; title=&quot;When I was commuting 60k/day on my bike in shitty suburban conditions, I used one of these  instead - you get limited use per trip, but you can always fill it up with a CO2 cylinder/bike pump: https://www.hpvelotechnik.com/en/recumbent-trikes-bikes/acce... It is loud .&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical skepticism exists regarding the bell&amp;#39;s specific frequency claims, with suggestions that pulsed white noise would be more effective at penetrating Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47690510&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m very sceptical of their claims that ~780Hz is in some way special, especially the way they represent it graphically. Playing a frequency sweep while wearing WH-1000XM3 headphones, I don&amp;#39;t notice any particular drop-off there. Near where I live, heavy goods vehicles are fitted with reversing indicators that make a &amp;#39;cshh cshh cshh&amp;#39; sound i.e. pulsed white-noise. White noise like that is the hardest for ANC to cancel. Sample: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3Wt1_51EVA&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://aphyr.com/posts/411-the-future-of-everything-is-lies-i-guess&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ML promises to be profoundly weird&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (aphyr.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47689648&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;609 points · 599 comments · by pabs3&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Aphyr explores the &amp;#34;jagged technology frontier&amp;#34; of modern machine learning, characterizing models as sophisticated &amp;#34;bullshit machines&amp;#34; that oscillate between expert-level task completion and frequent, confident confabulation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://aphyr.com/posts/411-the-future-of-everything-is-lies-i-guess&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Future of Everything is Lies, I Guess    URL Source: https://aphyr.com/posts/411-the-future-of-everything-is-lies-i-guess    Markdown Content:  # The Future of Everything is Lies, I Guess    *   [Aphyr](https://aphyr.com/)  *   [About](https://aphyr.com/about)  *   [Blog](https://aphyr.com/posts)  *   [Photos](https://aphyr.com/photos)  *   [Code](http://github.com/aphyr)    # [The Future of Everything is Lies, I…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion draws a parallel between the current AI era and the Industrial Revolution, suggesting that &amp;#34;rapacious&amp;#34; corporations are depleting the digital commons and upending the balance between creators and consumers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47693466&quot; title=&quot;There is a whole giant essay I probably need to write at some point, but I can&amp;#39;t help but see parallels between today and the Industrial Revolution. Prior to the industrial revolution, the natural world was nearly infinitely abundant. We simply weren&amp;#39;t efficient enough to fully exploit it. That meant that it was fine for things like property and the commons to be poorly defined. If all of us can go hunting in the woods and yet there is still game to be found, then there&amp;#39;s no compelling reason…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some participants argue that LLMs are merely &amp;#34;bullshit machines&amp;#34; that lack agency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47691937&quot; title=&quot;I appreciate the directness of calling LLMs &amp;#39;Bullshit machines.&amp;#39;  This terminology for LLMs is well established in academic circles and is much easier for laypeople to understand than terms like &amp;#39;non-deterministic.&amp;#39; I personally don&amp;#39;t like the excessive hype on the capabilities of AI. Setting realistic expectations will better drive better product adoption than carpet bombing users with marketing.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692774&quot; title=&quot;Thank you for putting it so succinctly. I keep explaining to my peers, friends and family that what actually is happening inside an LLM has nothing to do with conscience or agency  and that the term AI is just completely overloaded right now.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that confabulation is an inherent byproduct of scaling intelligence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692272&quot; title=&quot;Some people point at LLMs confabulating, as if this wasn’t something humans are already widely known for doing. I consider it highly plausible that confabulation is inherent to scaling intelligence. In order to run computation on data that due to dimensionality is computationally infeasible, you will most likely need to create a lower dimensional representation and do the computation on that. Collapsing the dimensionality is going to be lossy, which means it will have gaps between what it…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt; and that the technology&amp;#39;s rapid progress over the last seven years is undeniable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47691736&quot; title=&quot;I get the frustration, but it&amp;#39;s reductive to just call LLMs &amp;#39;bullshit machines&amp;#39; as if the models are not improving. The current flagship models are not perfect, but if you use GPT-2 for a few minutes, it&amp;#39;s incredible how much the industry has progressed in seven years. It&amp;#39;s true that people don&amp;#39;t have a good intuitive sense of what the models are good or bad at (see: counting the Rs in &amp;#39;strawberry&amp;#39;), but this is more a human limitation than a fundamental problem with the technology.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a notable divide regarding the impact on creators: some fear the death of the digital commons &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47693466&quot; title=&quot;There is a whole giant essay I probably need to write at some point, but I can&amp;#39;t help but see parallels between today and the Industrial Revolution. Prior to the industrial revolution, the natural world was nearly infinitely abundant. We simply weren&amp;#39;t efficient enough to fully exploit it. That meant that it was fine for things like property and the commons to be poorly defined. If all of us can go hunting in the woods and yet there is still game to be found, then there&amp;#39;s no compelling reason…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, while others view AI training as a successful way to disseminate ideas and help people, even without direct attribution &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47693680&quot; title=&quot;As you know, I deeply respect you. Not trying to argue here, just provide my own perspective: &amp;gt; Why would a writer put an article online if ChatGPT will slurp it up and regurgitate it back to users without anyone ever even finding the original article? I write things for two main reasons: I feel like I have to. I need to create things. On some level, I would write stuff down even if nobody reads it (and I do do that already, with private things.) But secondly, to get my ideas out there and try…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnet.com/home/security/when-flock-comes-to-town-why-cities-are-axing-the-controversial-surveillance-technology/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;US cities are axing Flock Safety surveillance technology&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cnet.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47689237&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;758 points · 431 comments · by giuliomagnifico&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dozens of U.S. cities and major brands like Ring are canceling contracts with Flock Safety due to public backlash over data privacy and the potential for surveillance abuse by law enforcement and federal agencies. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnet.com/home/security/when-flock-comes-to-town-why-cities-are-axing-the-controversial-surveillance-technology/&quot; title=&quot;When Flock Comes to Town: Why Cities Are Axing the Controversial Surveillance Technology    Flock Safety surveillance equipment is appearing in neighborhoods across the country. I spoke with experts about the tech, laws and privacy issues at play.    X    [Your Guide  To a Better Future](/ &amp;#39;CNET&amp;#39;)    [Add as a preferred source on Google](https://www.google.com/preferences/source?q=cnet.com)    * [News](/news/ &amp;#39;News&amp;#39;)  * [AI](/ai-atlas/ &amp;#39;AI&amp;#39;)  * [Tech](/tech/ &amp;#39;Tech&amp;#39;)      + [VPN](/tech/vpn/)    +…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the growing backlash against Flock Safety’s surveillance network, with critics arguing that CEO Garrett Langley is &amp;#34;out of touch&amp;#34; for attributing national crime drops to his technology while ignoring pre-COVID trends &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47690032&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m surprised Garrett Langley still has a job, he seems wildly out of touch.  For instance he really believes that his Panopticon as a service is the reason crime is down in cities, conveniently ignoring crime rates prior to COVID.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47690054&quot; title=&quot;He won’t for long. The backlash is just getting started. Left or right, no one wants their whereabouts subject to constant surveillance. His only advantage is that the cops are on his side and won’t let go of these cameras without a fight.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users highlight significant crime reductions in cities like San Francisco as a justification for the tech &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47690058&quot; title=&quot;I realize how unpopular flock is, and I will first say that I have literally never personally looked into the privacy concerns. But one city you don’t see named here is SF, which has cited Flock as a primary driver of its 10x reduction in car break-ins, and 30% reduction in burglaries. Those were a quality of life plague while I lived there&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that these systems are &amp;#34;security theater&amp;#34; purchased by bureaucrats to avoid addressing root causes like addiction and homelessness &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692561&quot; title=&quot;These companies build this tech in SF and Seattle, cities with some of the gnarliest public safety problems in the country, then turn around and sell it to smaller towns where it does more harm than good. Most places in America don&amp;#39;t have problems that surveillance solves. They have problems they already know about and won&amp;#39;t act on. Cameras don&amp;#39;t fix homelessness or addiction or underfunded services. They just make life harder for regular people. But that&amp;#39;s the whole appeal for bureaucrats.…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47693290&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Cameras don&amp;#39;t fix homelessness or addiction or underfunded services. They just make life harder for regular people.&amp;#39; In what way do cameras make life harder for regular people? If anything rampant crime (and progressive legal systems&amp;#39; unwillingness to lock up repeat offenders for a long time or at all) makes life much harder for regular people than a camera just sitting there.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A major point of contention is Flock&amp;#39;s expansion into high-speed &amp;#34;Drone as First Responder&amp;#34; platforms; some view this as a logical evolution for emergency response, while others see it as an escalation toward a &amp;#34;Panopticon as a service&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47691240&quot; title=&quot;It seems like this article buried the best lede of the story on paragraph ten, which explains Flock&amp;#39;s new business of surveillance drones launched in response to 911 calls (and also presumably triggered by other alerts configured by police and private businesses). &amp;gt; Flock has recently expanded into other technologies... Most concerning are the latest Flock drones equipped with high-powered cameras. Flock&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;Drone as First Responder&amp;#39; platform automates drone operations, including launching them…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47691951&quot; title=&quot;This is much less concerning to me than mass surveillance. If someone calls 911 and you need to send a first responder, why not send a drone to get there faster while a person is on their way?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47690032&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m surprised Garrett Langley still has a job, he seems wildly out of touch.  For instance he really believes that his Panopticon as a service is the reason crime is down in cities, conveniently ignoring crime rates prior to COVID.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.404media.co/microsoft-abruptly-terminates-veracrypt-account-halting-windows-updates/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft terminates VeraCrypt account, halting Windows updates&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (404media.co)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47690977&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;593 points · 247 comments · by donohoe&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft abruptly terminated the developer account for the open-source encryption tool VeraCrypt, preventing the team from submitting drivers for signing and effectively halting necessary updates for Windows compatibility. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.404media.co/microsoft-abruptly-terminates-veracrypt-account-halting-windows-updates/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;Oc85c&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;Oc85c&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether Secure Boot and executable signing are genuine security measures or tools for corporate control over user hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692745&quot; title=&quot;I still hope that one of these days people in general will realize that executable signing and SecureBoot are specifically designed for controlling what a normal person can run, rather than for anything resembling real security. The premises of either of those &amp;#39;mitigations&amp;#39; make absolutely no sense for personal computers.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47694518&quot; title=&quot;I strongly disagree on the Secure Boot front. It&amp;#39;s necessary for FDE to have any sort of practical security, it reduces malicious/vulnerable driver abuse (making it nontrivial), bootkits are a security nightmare and would otherwise be much more common in malware typical users encounter, and ultimately the user can control their secure boot setup and enroll their own keys if they wish. Does that mean that Microsoft doesn&amp;#39;t also use it as a form of control? Of course not. But conflating &amp;#39;Secure…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents argue these technologies are essential for Full Disk Encryption (FDE) and protecting users from supply chain tampering, bootkits, and physical access attacks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692883&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know about executable signing, but in the embedded world SecureBoot is also used to serve the customer; id est provide guarantees to the customer that the firmware of the device they receive has not been tampered with at some point in the supply chain.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47694518&quot; title=&quot;I strongly disagree on the Secure Boot front. It&amp;#39;s necessary for FDE to have any sort of practical security, it reduces malicious/vulnerable driver abuse (making it nontrivial), bootkits are a security nightmare and would otherwise be much more common in malware typical users encounter, and ultimately the user can control their secure boot setup and enroll their own keys if they wish. Does that mean that Microsoft doesn&amp;#39;t also use it as a form of control? Of course not. But conflating &amp;#39;Secure…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47693090&quot; title=&quot;Tradeoffs. Which is more likely here? 1. A customer wants to run their own firmware, or 2. Someone malicious close to the customer, an angry ex, tampers with their device, and uses the lack of Secure Boot to modify the OS to hide all trace of a tracker&amp;#39;s existence, or 3. A malicious piece of firmware uses the lack of Secure Boot to modify the boot partition to ensure the malware loads before the OS, thereby permanently disabling all ability for the system to repair itself from within itself…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, critics contend that these &amp;#34;mitigations&amp;#34; prioritize platform control over user freedom, potentially bricking devices once manufacturers cease support &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692745&quot; title=&quot;I still hope that one of these days people in general will realize that executable signing and SecureBoot are specifically designed for controlling what a normal person can run, rather than for anything resembling real security. The premises of either of those &amp;#39;mitigations&amp;#39; make absolutely no sense for personal computers.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47693003&quot; title=&quot;And what if that customer wants to run their own firmware, ie after the manufacturer goes out of business? &amp;#39;Security&amp;#39; in this case conveniently prevente that.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47694561&quot; title=&quot;Anything that restricts user freedom is entirely bad, even if it&amp;#39;s at the expense of security.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some note that users can technically disable Secure Boot or enroll their own keys, others argue the inherent power imbalance allows companies like Microsoft to unilaterally restrict software access &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47691379&quot; title=&quot;With Windows, you get what you pay for. In this case, that&amp;#39;s an OS controlled by an unaccountable company that can take application software away from you. Related: If you&amp;#39;re the customer, you&amp;#39;re the product.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47694735&quot; title=&quot;But...it doesn&amp;#39;t restrict user freedom. If the user wishes to do so, they can disable SB.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.terrybisson.com/theyre-made-out-of-meat-2/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;They&amp;#39;re made out of meat (1991)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (terrybisson.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47688678&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;634 points · 179 comments · by surprisetalk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two aliens decide to ignore and erase records of humanity after discovering that the species is composed entirely of &amp;#34;meat,&amp;#34; finding the concept of biological sentience too bizarre and repulsive for official contact. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.terrybisson.com/theyre-made-out-of-meat-2/&quot; title=&quot;Title: They’re Made Out of Meat - TERRY BISSON of the UNIVERSE    URL Source: http://www.terrybisson.com/theyre-made-out-of-meat-2/    Published Time: 2020-08-28T20:52:45+00:00    Markdown Content:  # They’re Made Out of Meat - TERRY BISSON of the UNIVERSE    [Skip to content](http://www.terrybisson.com/theyre-made-out-of-meat-2/#main)    *   [](https://www.facebook.com/terry.bisson)    [![Image 1: TERRY BISSON of the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While many users praise the 1991 short story and its film adaptation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47689874&quot; title=&quot;The short film someone made is pretty great: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6JFTmQCFHg&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47690939&quot; title=&quot;Also by Terry Bisson and one of my favorite stories is Bears Discover Fire 1990 https://www.lightspeedmagazine.com/fiction/bears-discover-fi...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, some criticize the story&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;comical reductionism,&amp;#34; arguing that reducing the immense complexity of human biology and culture to &amp;#34;meat&amp;#34; ignores the awesomeness of the cosmos &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47690374&quot; title=&quot;As I’ve gotten older, it’s become increasingly hard for me to understand how anyone can read such comical reductionism as enlightenment. We are infinitely complex arrangements of systems built upon systems, from the quantum properties of carbon atoms up through the proteins that make the “meat” we are so glibly reduced to, through the complexities and adaptations of mammalian bodies, up to the fearsome order of the human brain and the intricate sprawl of human society and culture. To reduce us…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant debate exists regarding the short film&amp;#39;s logic; critics point out that the characters appear as humans and use &amp;#34;meat sounds&amp;#34; to speak despite expressing total disbelief that meat-based life could exist &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47690926&quot; title=&quot;The short film makes no sense, as the 2 people talking are meat themselves.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47691716&quot; title=&quot;In the story, the very idea of permanently meat-based beings appals them, and in fact one of them doesn&amp;#39;t entirely believe it. So why would they look like meat to &amp;#39;blend in&amp;#39;, a priori, if one of them doesn&amp;#39;t even fathom the idea? &amp;#39;Blend in&amp;#39; with what? One of them doesn&amp;#39;t believe what it&amp;#39;s dealing with! Like a sibling comment mentions, they talk about &amp;#39;meat sounds&amp;#39;... using meat sounds! Why would they find it surprising if that&amp;#39;s how they are communicating in the short film? They are not…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Supporters of the film suggest the characters are merely using disguises to blend in, though others counter that one cannot effectively &amp;#34;blend in&amp;#34; using a concept they find fundamentally unfathomable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47691670&quot; title=&quot;They only look like meat to blend in. It&amp;#39;s the only way to figure out if they&amp;#39;re made out of meat.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695111&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; So why would they look like meat to &amp;#39;blend in&amp;#39;, a priori, if one of them doesn&amp;#39;t even fathom the idea? I&amp;#39;d imagine British spies in WWII sometimes wore swastikas to blend in? They infiltrating to investigate. It needn&amp;#39;t be an endorsement of the practice.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47697804&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I&amp;#39;d imagine British spies in WWII sometimes wore swastikas to blend in? British spies in WWII wouldn&amp;#39;t do that if the entire concept of what a swastika was baffled them. You have to understand at least basically what the thing you&amp;#39;re looking at is in order to use it as a symbol. If you have _no_ concept of people being made out of meat being possible, you don&amp;#39;t dress up as people made out of meat. You do that if it&amp;#39;s a common concept to you and you&amp;#39;re trying to fit in.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ai.meta.com/blog/introducing-muse-spark-msl/?_fb_noscript=1&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ai.meta.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692043&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;392 points · 367 comments · by chabons&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meta has introduced Muse Spark, a new initiative focused on scaling AI models toward achieving personal superintelligence. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ai.meta.com/blog/introducing-muse-spark-msl/?_fb_noscript=1&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;meta.ai&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;meta.ai&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of Muse Spark has sparked debate over whether Meta’s massive investment in frontier AI is justified, with some critics labeling the model &amp;#34;trite&amp;#34; for merely matching existing benchmarks like Opus 4.6 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692488&quot; title=&quot;This would have been an amazing release 6 months ago. But the industry moves so fast, this is a trite release. Maybe it’s best for Meta to sell their superintelligence division. I don’t think Zuck’s vision is particularly compelling.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692699&quot; title=&quot;How is that Meta spent so much money for talent and hardware, but the model barely matches Opus 4.6? Especially, looking at these numbers after Claude Mythos, feels like either Anthropic has some secret sauce, or everyone else is dumber compared to the talent Anthropic has&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that Meta lacks a clear path to profitability compared to cloud providers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692615&quot; title=&quot;I never understood why meta decided to join the race. They don’t sell compute like Google or Microsoft. Why not let others do the hard work and integrate their LLMs in your systems if needed?  I assume it’s because they have Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp, Thread data and feel they should be the ones using them for training, but it’s really not obvious how having a frontier AI lab benefits their business&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt; and liken the current AI race to the &amp;#34;Railroad Mania&amp;#34; bubble &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692789&quot; title=&quot;This really reinforces the idea that the AI race and the Railroad Mania of the 19th century are very similar. So many different companies are going to have similarly powerful ai that there will be no moat around it and it will be cheap.  They will never earn their investment back.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that achieving parity allows Meta to avoid paying competitors for API access across their massive social platforms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47693187&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t get the comments trashing this. If it slightly beats or even matches Opus 4.6, it means Meta is capable of building a model competitive with the leading AI company.  Sure, they spent a lot of money and will have on-going costs.   But how much more work would it take to turn that into a coding agent people are willing to try (and pay for) along side their usage of a collection of agents (Claude, Codex, etc)?  Also means Meta doesn&amp;#39;t have to pay another company to use a SATA model across…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692546&quot; title=&quot;A new model comparable (ish) to the Claude/Gemini/GPT flagships is a big deal for the industry and for Meta even if it doesn&amp;#39;t set the new frontier.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Skeptics also point to a history of &amp;#34;benchmaxxing&amp;#34; and delayed releases as evidence that Meta may be struggling to keep pace with the &amp;#34;secret sauce&amp;#34; of labs like Anthropic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692699&quot; title=&quot;How is that Meta spent so much money for talent and hardware, but the model barely matches Opus 4.6? Especially, looking at these numbers after Claude Mythos, feels like either Anthropic has some secret sauce, or everyone else is dumber compared to the talent Anthropic has&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47693292&quot; title=&quot;Comments trashing this are rightly correct skeptics who remember the benchmaxxing of llama 4. This model was out in the woods as early as like a couple months ago but they didn&amp;#39;t release it because it was at gemini 2.5 pro levels.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ishormuzopenyet.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Is Hormuz open yet?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ishormuzopenyet.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47696562&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;482 points · 209 comments · by anonfunction&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer created a website to track the operational status of the Strait of Hormuz using manually updated MarineTraffic data and IMF PortWatch statistics. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ishormuzopenyet.com/&quot; title=&quot;I built this because I was interested in the data. Didn&amp;amp;#x27;t fully get it to what I wanted, but thought I&amp;amp;#x27;d share it nonetheless. Maybe someone has better data sources they could share!&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Turns out live ship tracking APIs are expensive so I manually just copied the json from &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.marinetraffic.com&amp;amp;#x2F;en&amp;amp;#x2F;ais&amp;amp;#x2F;home&amp;amp;#x2F;centerx:57.4&amp;amp;#x2F;centery:26.4&amp;amp;#x2F;zoom:8&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the ethics of including PolyMarket data, with some arguing it creates perverse incentives for violence while others view it as a valid consolidation of &amp;#34;crowd wisdom&amp;#34; similar to traditional stocks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47697807&quot; title=&quot;This is a nice overview, but please remove the PolyMarket indicator. It is an obscene prediction mechanism as it creates horrible financial incentives to a war situation. Its degenerate effects have been featured here before. [1] Let&amp;#39;s not condone &amp;#39;measurements&amp;#39; that are effectively ways for people to gain money on important political decisions, affecting the lives of many people. (1) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47397822&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47697881&quot; title=&quot;By this logic would you also consider trading OIL (USO) and Palantir a &amp;#39;obscene&amp;#39; market.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47698005&quot; title=&quot;Actually yes. I put my money in things I would like to see shape the future, which I think is what investment should be about: shaping the future. But disregarding this admittedly niche attitude; it&amp;#39;s not the same thing. If you&amp;#39;re opening bets on the ships being bombed before a certain date, you&amp;#39;re opening incentives for people to do so. Although buying OIL or Palantir is morally questionable, it does not create such direct incentives.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47697826&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; &amp;#39;obscene&amp;#39; And yet, it is the wisdom of the crowds. The crowds being obscene. Aren&amp;#39;t we all constantly hitting re-fresh for updates, and making predictions. The prediction markets are just consolidating that &amp;#39;desire&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Users clarify that while the strait is legally open under UNCLOS, Iran is reportedly extorting cryptocurrency tolls, and many ships remain stationary because transit would void their insurance coverage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47697720&quot; title=&quot;According to the Financial Times (1), the straight is &amp;#39;open&amp;#39; but Iran is extorting fees for passing ships. &amp;gt; &amp;#39;Iran will demand that shipping companies pay tolls in cryptocurrency for oil tankers passing through the Strait of Hormuz, as it seeks to retain control over passage through the key waterway during the two-week ceasefire.&amp;#39; If they really will start doing so for all shipping, that would be odd since the straight itself is in Oman&amp;#39;s territorial waters. Even so, the UNCLOS convention (2)…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47696776&quot; title=&quot;So apparently the reason they don’t just go for it is due to insurance. Because Iran technically isn’t suppose to just sink a civilian vessel, but the risk is there so the ships are ordered by the owner/stakeholder not to go due to the insurance coverage. Kind of interesting, they could technically call Iran’s bluff but it would mean, they violate the insurance contract and lose coverage? I’m just reading about this so probably not the full picture.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical feedback notes that the site&amp;#39;s four-day data delay undermines its utility for real-time monitoring, though the historical visualization is appreciated &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47697174&quot; title=&quot;The data being ~4 days delayed does kind of make this less useful. It is a nice concept and cool to see the historical data though. Just think the domain and the large &amp;#39;NO&amp;#39; doesn&amp;#39;t really fit with the lack of current data.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nickvecchioni.github.io/thoughts/2026/04/08/anthropic-support-doesnt-exist/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I&amp;#39;ve been waiting over a month for Anthropic to respond to my billing issue&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nickvecchioni.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47693679&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;431 points · 200 comments · by nickvec&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Claude Max subscriber reports being ignored by Anthropic support for over a month after receiving $180 in erroneous &amp;#34;Extra Usage&amp;#34; charges that appear to be linked to a widespread technical glitch. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nickvecchioni.github.io/thoughts/2026/04/08/anthropic-support-doesnt-exist/&quot; title=&quot;Title: I’ve been waiting over a month for Anthropic support to respond to my billing issue    URL Source: https://nickvecchioni.github.io/thoughts/2026/04/08/anthropic-support-doesnt-exist/    Published Time: 2026-04-08T00:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  # I’ve been waiting over a month for Anthropic support to respond to my billing issue | Nick’s Thoughts    [Nick&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users report significant frustration with Anthropic&amp;#39;s automated support, noting that while the company markets advanced AI agents, their own support chatbot fails to resolve basic billing issues &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695451&quot; title=&quot;I tried their Pro plan on March 1 and immediately noticed how bad their usage limits were, so I asked for a refund that same evening. Their chatbot accepted the request, I was downgraded to the free plan immediately, and since then I have been waiting for the money.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695056&quot; title=&quot;I had the displeasure of interacting with that support agent earlier today and was very surprised. It&amp;#39;s just as good as the one my ISP has. We&amp;#39;re meant to trust Anthropic enough to replace all of our engineers by their model for writing our software but somehow they don&amp;#39;t trust it enough to let it handle simple customer support decisions. But shhhh, it&amp;#39;s voluntarily nerfed just slightly bellow ASI for our safety.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695730&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Anthropic is an AI company that builds one of the most capable AI assistants in the world. Their support system is a Fin AI chatbot that can’t actually help you. This really cuts to the reality of AI hype: no, agents are not nearly as capable as OpenAI, Anthropic, etc. need you (or rather your C-suite, itching to fire you) to believe.  They really, really need you to believe the hype.  How can you tell?  Cases like this and the fact that there are 5000 open bugs, constant regressions, ignored…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While many commenters suggest a credit card chargeback as the immediate solution &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695517&quot; title=&quot;Issue a chargeback.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695716&quot; title=&quot;If a business attempts to steal from me I instantly charge back and the onus is on them to prove that I owe them money.  I do this all the time and have never been blacklisted.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47694908&quot; title=&quot;This is what credit card chargebacks are for.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others warn this is a &amp;#34;nuclear option&amp;#34; that often leads to permanent blacklisting from the service &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695561&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s important to remember that a chargeback should be considered the nuclear option, and, when using it, one should be comfortable with the possibility that one might never do business with this company again, since it could result in being blacklisted (even if one is, in fact, in the right). I&amp;#39;m not saying not to do it, but one should keep in mind the potential repercussions.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47694915&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m sure this guy would like to actually keep using Claude though instead of getting permanently banned.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The situation is highlighted as a symptom of &amp;#34;AI hype,&amp;#34; where companies run lean on human staff and rely on unreliable automated systems that struggle with simple customer service tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47694962&quot; title=&quot;This is the risk of being a consumer in the AI world - companies are running extremely lean on real humans and are deferring support to AI chatbots with no real reasoning abilities... Also an issue with scale - for example, Google having similar issues of not handling small, isolated cases. Hope you get your money back!&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695730&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Anthropic is an AI company that builds one of the most capable AI assistants in the world. Their support system is a Fin AI chatbot that can’t actually help you. This really cuts to the reality of AI hype: no, agents are not nearly as capable as OpenAI, Anthropic, etc. need you (or rather your C-suite, itching to fire you) to believe.  They really, really need you to believe the hype.  How can you tell?  Cases like this and the fact that there are 5000 open bugs, constant regressions, ignored…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47696838&quot; title=&quot;I have a few customers like that. They sign up, forget about it, then they see it on their statement and issue a chargeback. Not only do they get their $20 back (that they very willingly signed up for), but I have to pay another $35 to Stripe for the privilege of having a forgetful customer who couldn&amp;#39;t even be bothered to email me for a refund.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thedrive.com/news/john-deere-to-pay-99-million-in-monumental-right-to-repair-settlement&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;John Deere to pay $99M in right-to-repair settlement&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (thedrive.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47696035&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;395 points · 128 comments · by CharlesW&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;John Deere has reached a $99 million class-action settlement to resolve right-to-repair disputes, agreeing to provide farmers and third-party repair shops with digital diagnostic and maintenance tools for the next 10 years. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thedrive.com/news/john-deere-to-pay-99-million-in-monumental-right-to-repair-settlement&quot; title=&quot;John Deere to Pay $99 Million in Monumental Right-to-Repair Settlement    The ag manufacturing giant will also make digital diagnostic, maintenance, and repair tools available to third parties for 10 years.    [ ]    [![The Drive Logo](https://www.thedrive.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Logo_TD_svg_38b8b2-1.svg?quality=85)](/)    [ ]    [![The Drive Logo](https://www.thedrive.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Logo_TD_svg_38b8b2-1.svg?quality=85)](/)    * [Latest](https://www.thedrive.com/latest)  * [ ]…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users criticize John Deere for &amp;#34;user-hostile&amp;#34; engineering, such as epoxy-embedded batteries in fuel gauges that disable the machine upon failure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47696929&quot; title=&quot;One of the most user-hostile companies on earth. My John Deere lawnmower came with a fuel gauge that runs off a CR2032 that&amp;#39;s embedded in epoxy. The battery runs out of charge in about six months and the gauge stops working. If you saw the gauge open and replace the battery it doesn&amp;#39;t start working again. If you disconnect the gauge the lawnmower won&amp;#39;t start. Replacement gauges are $60.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that consumers should simply avoid the brand through better research &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47697007&quot; title=&quot;Don’t buy their stuff then.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47697126&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Don&amp;#39;t buy their stuff&amp;#39; is exactly the right answer.  You need to do your research before you buy big ticket items.  It may not be true in every sector, but Deere has plenty of competition.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that such research is only possible if victims are encouraged to share their experiences without being dismissed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47697047&quot; title=&quot;Don’t comment if you don’t want to actually contribute. How are people supposed to know these things before buying the equipment. What if they’re the only provider in their region? There’s a billion reasons why your comment doesn’t contribute.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47697341&quot; title=&quot;How can you do research without victims complaining?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47697889&quot; title=&quot;Because when they do, they receive snide remarks like &amp;#39;just don&amp;#39;t buy their stuff then&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a consensus that the $99M settlement is a small price for the company to pay, leading to suggestions that planned obsolescence should be treated as fraud or met with higher punitive fines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47696735&quot; title=&quot;Seems like a small price for a big company. Shouldn’t there be some higher punitive fine for even trying this tactic? It’s basically zero cost for companies to be abusive.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47697106&quot; title=&quot;Hot take: it takes mental gymnastics to think that planned obsolescence is not fraud.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lw4W9V57SKs&amp;amp;t=5716s&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Revision Demoparty 2026: Razor1911 [video]&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (youtube.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47685739&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;383 points · 133 comments · by tetrisgm&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legendary demoscene group Razor1911 presented a production at the Revision Demoparty 2026, showcasing digital art and programming skills within the international competition. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lw4W9V57SKs&amp;t=5716s&quot; title=&quot;Title: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lw4W9V57SKs&amp;amp;t=5716s    URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lw4W9V57SKs&amp;amp;t=5716s    Warning: Target URL returned error 429: Too Many Requests    Markdown Content:  # https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lw4W9V57SKs&amp;amp;t=5716s    * * *    * * *    **About this page**     Our systems have detected unusual traffic from your computer network. This page checks to see if it&amp;#39;s really you sending the requests, and not a robot. [Why did this…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Razor1911 release at Revision 2024 sparked nostalgia for the 1990s BBS era, with users celebrating the group&amp;#39;s legendary status and the demo&amp;#39;s masterful use of classic aesthetics like FILE_ID.DIZ art &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47687086&quot; title=&quot;I upvote every post related to the demoscene due to my age, so I couldn&amp;#39;t let this one, especially when it&amp;#39;s coming from RZR.  Imagine if we could get a new release from FC as well in 2026 (40 years since their founding)!!! More about Razor 1911 and Future Crew for the young readers of HN: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Razor_1911 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_Crew P.S. Too many groups to mention, but these two hold a special place in my mind ;-) P.S.2. Extra mention to the most famous…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47686873&quot; title=&quot;Ah wow. I really enjoyed the demoscene back in the 90s. Was never a part of it but I was always fascinated by the effects and music and ascii art that these guys created. A BBS in my city always had the latest e-zines like Reality Check Network and Affinity, and others I forget. Reading up on the scene and about groups like Razor1911 was something I spent a lot of time on when I was younger. Amazing demo and homage to the era.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47686514&quot; title=&quot;Beautiful. Masterfully done. I love all the BBS-era aesthetics and callouts. I hadn&amp;#39;t seen FILE_ID.DIZ art in forever.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debated whether the music should be classified as MIDI or module formats like .XM and .S3M &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47686740&quot; title=&quot;That was amazing, really great song &amp;amp; visuals too. Takes me back to the days when you couldn&amp;#39;t close the keygen because the midi playing was such a banger. https://keygenmusic.tk/&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47687517&quot; title=&quot;MIDI songs? I checked, I couldn&amp;#39;t find any from the link you posted. Most were different module formats, like XM, Protracker, S3M, Impulse Tracker. Those have nothing to do with midi other than they also produce music.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47688793&quot; title=&quot;At one point in time, (I think maybe in connection with some mobile phone being able to play .midi files?) MIDI songs was (incorrectly) referring to a style/type of music rather than the transport/protocol we use for sending notes between instruments/devices, or the file format. I&amp;#39;m still since then always assuming the above when someone says &amp;#39;MIDI music&amp;#39;; they really mean &amp;#39;really basic/simple music&amp;#39; or just straight up &amp;#39;chiptune&amp;#39; sometimes. It has nothing to do with MIDI really, just a…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others discussed the technical shift from strict size-limited &amp;#34;intros&amp;#34; to modern &amp;#34;open&amp;#34; category demos that can reach hundreds of megabytes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47686753&quot; title=&quot;Demos used to have sizes - I can&amp;#39;t see one for this, is it just an &amp;#39;open&amp;#39; category? This thing is far too insane to be size limited, surely?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47686798&quot; title=&quot;In demoscene nomenclature, an &amp;#39;intro&amp;#39; is a demo with a sizelimit. This was entered in the demo compo, ergo &amp;#39;no size limit&amp;#39;. With file size, most democoders go all the way, both ways. By that I mean that if they choose a sizelimit category, they squeeze out every last byte, and if they don&amp;#39;t, most don&amp;#39;t care about filesize at all . There&amp;#39;s demos these days that are many times bigger than an acceptable video recording would be because nobody bothered to eg compress the assets, it includes an…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable anecdotes include a former scener&amp;#39;s story of being detained by Swedish customs while traveling to a 1991 competition with Future Crew, and their recent efforts to debug 30-year-old assembly code using modern LLMs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47689685&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I really enjoyed the demoscene back in the 90s. Was never a part of it but I was always fascinated by the effects and music and ascii art that these guys created. It was quite something... I take it there are quite a few hotshots on HN who used to be in the top groups. I was in a group and we were writing small intros for BBSes with a couple of friends and then we&amp;#39;d get infinite leech/upload ratio on those BBSes. Best memory was driving through Belgium / the Netherlands / Denmark / putting…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://slate.com/technology/2019/02/openai-gpt2-text-generating-algorithm-ai-dangerous.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OpenAI says its new model GPT-2 is too dangerous to release (2019)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (slate.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47684326&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;395 points · 120 comments · by surprisetalk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI sparked an ethical debate in 2019 by withholding the full release of its GPT-2 text-generation model, citing concerns that the sophisticated technology could be weaponized to spread large-scale misinformation and spam. &lt;a href=&quot;https://slate.com/technology/2019/02/openai-gpt2-text-generating-algorithm-ai-dangerous.html&quot; title=&quot;When Is Technology Too Dangerous to Release to the Public?    If recent history is any indication, trying to suppress or control the proliferation of A.I. tools may be a losing battle.    Advertisement    Advertisement    [Skip to the content](#main)    * [Slate Shop](https://shop.slate.com/)  * [Games](https://slate.com/tag/slate-games)  * [Newsletters](https://slate.com/newsletters)  * [Sign In](https://slate.com/sign-in)  * Account      Activating this button will toggle the display of additional content     …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters reflect on OpenAI’s 2019 decision to withhold GPT-2, with some dismissing it as part of a long history of &amp;#34;overhyping&amp;#34; model capabilities for marketing purposes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47684778&quot; title=&quot;Someone needs to make a compilation of all these classic OpenAI moments. Including hits like GPT-2 too dangerous, the 64x64 image model DALL-E too scary, &amp;#39;push the veil of ignorance back&amp;#39;, AGI achieved internally, Q*/strawberry is able to solve math and is making OpenAI researchers panic, etc. etc. I use Codex btw, and I really love it. But some of these companies have been so overhyping the capabilities of these models for years now that it&amp;#39;s both funny to look back and tiresome to still keep…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others argue the company was &amp;#34;unintentionally right,&amp;#34; noting that the subsequent explosion of AI-generated &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; and disinformation has significantly degraded online content quality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47684567&quot; title=&quot;I think they are right unintentionally. The growing amount of low-quality content everywhere could become a real problem.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47684646&quot; title=&quot;They were more than right. They were correct in an intentional, precise manner. This is what OpenAI actually stated[0]: &amp;gt; Synthetic imagery, audio, and video, imply that technologies are reducing the cost of generating fake content and waging disinformation campaigns. &amp;gt; ‘The public at large will need to become more sceptical of text they find online, just as the ”deep fakes” phenomenon calls for more scepticism about images. It ended up just like that. [0]:…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47684815&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, I find it a bit odd how at the time everyone was pointing and laughing at OpenAI for being obviously wrong about this. Now in 2026, AI slop is very obviously a serious problem - it inundates all platforms and obscures the truth. And people are still saying OpenAI in 2019 were wrong?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. A notable anecdote highlights how over-reliance on LLMs can create a &amp;#34;loop&amp;#34; that erodes critical thinking, leading users to spend hours prompting models for simple fixes they could manually complete in minutes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47684778&quot; title=&quot;Someone needs to make a compilation of all these classic OpenAI moments. Including hits like GPT-2 too dangerous, the 64x64 image model DALL-E too scary, &amp;#39;push the veil of ignorance back&amp;#39;, AGI achieved internally, Q*/strawberry is able to solve math and is making OpenAI researchers panic, etc. etc. I use Codex btw, and I really love it. But some of these companies have been so overhyping the capabilities of these models for years now that it&amp;#39;s both funny to look back and tiresome to still keep…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47684873&quot; title=&quot;I understand how laughable that sounds when I say it out loud. But the reality is, when I&amp;#39;m in a state of &amp;#39;Tell LLM what to do, verify, repeat&amp;#39;, it&amp;#39;s really hard to sometimes break out of that loop and do manual fixes. Maybe the brain has some advanced optimization where once you&amp;#39;re in a loop, roughly staying inside that loop has a lower impedance than starting one. Maybe that&amp;#39;s why the flow state feels so magical, it&amp;#39;s when resistance is at its lowest. Maybe I need sleep.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47685023&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; it&amp;#39;s really hard to sometimes break out of that loop and do manual fixes You&amp;#39;re aware of the MIT Media Lab study[0] from last summer regarding LLM usage and eroding critical thinking skills...? [0] Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task  June 2025  DOI:10.48550/arXiv.2506.08872&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kalmanfilter.net&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Understanding the Kalman filter with a simple radar example&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (kalmanfilter.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47693153&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;430 points · 66 comments · by alex_be&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Kalman Filter is an optimal estimation algorithm that predicts and updates the state of a system by balancing noisy measurements with dynamic models. Using a recursive loop of prediction and correction, it minimizes uncertainty to track objects like aircraft or financial trends accurately. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kalmanfilter.net&quot; title=&quot;Title: Kalman Filter Explained Through Examples    URL Source: https://kalmanfilter.net/    Published Time: Wed, 08 Apr 2026 13:19:29 GMT    Markdown Content:  KalmanFilter.NET   English  OVERVIEW  KALMAN FILTER TUTORIAL  KALMAN FILTER BOOK  KALMAN FILTER    &amp;#39;If you can&amp;#39;t explain it simply, you don&amp;#39;t understand it well enough.&amp;#39;    Albert Einstein  INTRODUCTION TO KALMAN FILTER    The Kalman Filter is an algorithm for estimating and predicting the state of a system in the presence of uncertainty, such as…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author presents a radar-based tutorial designed to simplify Kalman filters for those with basic statistics knowledge, though some users noted the distinction between the system model and the filter algorithm itself could be clearer &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47693178&quot; title=&quot;Author here. I recently updated the homepage of my Kalman Filter tutorial with a new example based on a simple radar tracking problem. The goal was to make the Kalman Filter understandable to anyone with basic knowledge of statistics and linear algebra, without requiring advanced mathematics. The example starts with a radar measuring the distance to a moving object and gradually builds intuition around noisy measurements, prediction using a motion model, and how the Kalman Filter combines both.…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47694798&quot; title=&quot;Firstly I think the clarity in general is good.  The one piece I think you could do with explaining early on is which pieces of what you are describing are the model of the system and which pieces are the Kalman filter.  I was following along as you built the markov model of the state matrix etc and then you called those equations the Kalman filter, but I didn&amp;#39;t think we had built a Kalman filter yet. Your early explanation of the filter (as a method for estimating the state of a system under…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695143&quot; title=&quot;You’re pointing out a real conceptual issue: where the system model ends and where the Kalman filter begins. In Kalman filter theory there are two different components: - The system model - The Kalman filter (the algorithm) The state transition and measurement equations belong to the system model. They describe the physics of the system and can vary from one application to another. The Kalman filter is the algorithm that uses this model to estimate the current state and predict the future…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters praised the clarity, others questioned the value of a paid resource when comprehensive free alternatives exist &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47694605&quot; title=&quot;This seems to be an ad for a fairly expensive book on a topic that is described in detail in many (free) resources. See for example: https://rlabbe.github.io/Kalman-and-Bayesian-Filters-in-Pyth... Is there something in this particular resource that makes it worth buying?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47694877&quot; title=&quot;I really loved this one: https://www.bzarg.com/p/how-a-kalman-filter-works-in-picture...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47696945&quot; title=&quot;There are not many good resources on Kalman filters. In fact, I have found a single one that I&amp;#39;d consider good. This is someone who has spent a lot of time to newly understand Kalman filters.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Practical advice emphasized that Kalman filters are not a &amp;#34;fix-all&amp;#34; for existing data but excel when high-frequency sampling is integrated into the system design &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695094&quot; title=&quot;Kalman filters are very cool, but when applying them you&amp;#39;ve got to know that they&amp;#39;re not magic. I struggled to apply Kalman Filters for a toy project about ten years ago, because the thing I didn&amp;#39;t internalize is that Kalman filters excel at offsetting low-quality data by sampling at a higher rate. You can &amp;#39;retroactively&amp;#39; apply a Kalman filter to a dataset and see some improvement, but you&amp;#39;ll only get amazing results if you sample your very-noisy data at a much higher rate than if you were…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47697063&quot; title=&quot;I feel like people overcomplicate even the &amp;#39;simple&amp;#39; explanations like the OPs and this one. Basically, a Kalman filter is part of a larger class of &amp;#39;estimators&amp;#39;, which take the input data, and run additional processing on top of it to figure out the true measurement. The very basic estimator a low pass filter is also an &amp;#39;estimator&amp;#39; - it rejects high frequency noise, and gives you essentially a moving average. But is a static filter that assumes that your process has noise of a certain…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mariozechner.at/posts/2026-04-08-ive-sold-out/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I&amp;#39;ve sold out&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mariozechner.at)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47687533&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;289 points · 179 comments · by doppp&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mario Zechner has joined the startup Earendil, bringing his open-source coding agent, **pi**, under the company’s ownership while committing to keep the core software MIT-licensed. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mariozechner.at/posts/2026-04-08-ive-sold-out/&quot; title=&quot;Title: I&amp;#39;ve sold out    URL Source: https://mariozechner.at/posts/2026-04-08-ive-sold-out/    Published Time: Thursday, 09-Apr-2026 06:00:59 UTC    Markdown Content:  # I&amp;#39;ve sold out    [## { Mario Zechner } developer • coach • speaker](https://mariozechner.at/)    # I&amp;#39;ve sold out    2026-04-08    ![Image 1](https://mariozechner.at/posts/2026-04-08-ive-sold-out/media/header.png)    What a nice WebGL shader. Look at draining your battery.    # Table of contents    *   [Why would you do…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the acquisition of Pi, a coding agent harness praised by users for its superior code quality and elegant design compared to competitors like Claude Code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47689007&quot; title=&quot;Pi is a coding agent harness, like Claude Code, but significantly better and more elegant. Here is a good post describing it: https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/1/31/pi/ I switched a few months ago and have not looked back. Unfortunately Anthropic blocked access from Claude Subscription users today, but that&amp;#39;s a different story.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47688821&quot; title=&quot;I found out last night via pi.dev. And the new repo of pi didn’t exist yet. I have been working with pi-mono locally for a few months now. Great code base to study. Much higher quality than CC. (I have posted a gist analysis before.) Will keep an eye on the work of these talented engineers and entrepreneurs. Good luck guys!&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While many users express happiness for the creator, there is widespread disappointment regarding the &amp;#34;sell out&amp;#34; and the predictable pattern of open projects being absorbed by corporations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47689033&quot; title=&quot;Understandable, I&amp;#39;d probably do the same in his position. Still sucks, we&amp;#39;ve seen this pattern a thousands times before and what happens next is pretty obvious. I was prototyping something with pi under the hood for a personal project, going to switch off it now.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47687973&quot; title=&quot;Happy for Mario, Pi is the best harness I&amp;#39;ve ever tried. But overall disappointed by this decision. &amp;#39;This time everything is different&amp;#39; until it&amp;#39;s not.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, users report that the tool recently stopped working due to Anthropic blocking third-party harnesses from Claude subscriptions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47689007&quot; title=&quot;Pi is a coding agent harness, like Claude Code, but significantly better and more elegant. Here is a good post describing it: https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/1/31/pi/ I switched a few months ago and have not looked back. Unfortunately Anthropic blocked access from Claude Subscription users today, but that&amp;#39;s a different story.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47688341&quot; title=&quot;Incidentally pi stopped working today - under the Claude subscription ban for other harnesses. Awaiting a plugin that fixes it.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://apnews.com/article/aadam-jacobs-collection-concerts-internet-archive-chicago-b1c9c4466a2db409a83523ad84b79d62&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Volunteers turn a fan&amp;#39;s recordings of 10K concerts into an online treasure trove&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (apnews.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47687443&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;382 points · 76 comments · by geox&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Volunteers are digitizing a fan&amp;#39;s collection of 10,000 live concert recordings, including Nirvana’s 1989 Chicago debut, to create a massive online archive for the Internet Archive. &lt;a href=&quot;https://apnews.com/article/aadam-jacobs-collection-concerts-internet-archive-chicago-b1c9c4466a2db409a83523ad84b79d62&quot; title=&quot;Volunteers turn a fan&amp;#39;s recordings of 10,000 concerts into an online treasure trove    In 1989, an up-and-coming rock band from Washington called Nirvana played in Chicago for the first time at a club called Dreamerz.    [![AP Logo](https://assets.apnews.com/19/66/bc546486408c8595f01753a9fbeb/ap-logo-176-by-208.svg)](/)    Menu    * [World](https://apnews.com/world-news)      SECTIONS      [Iran war](https://apnews.com/hub/iran)    [Russia-Ukraine war](https://apnews.com/hub/russia-ukraine)   …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The community is impressed by the high audio quality of the Aadam Jacobs collection, highlighting notable recordings of Nirvana, Tracy Chapman, and Midnight Oil &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47728669&quot; title=&quot;https://archive.org/details/@aadam_jacobs_collection The Nirvana gig mentioned is https://archive.org/details/ajc00795_nirvana-1989-07-08 The quality is surprisingly good for a bootleg and the band are super-tight! Donate to the IA here: https://archive.org/donate&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47728924&quot; title=&quot;Found a few bands whose names I recognise. :) * Midnight Oil: https://archive.org/details/@aadam_jacobs_collection?and[]=c... This one has a fairly decent quality recording of &amp;#39;Beds are Burning&amp;#39; too.  Australian Classic Rock. :) --- * Tracy Chapman: https://archive.org/details/@aadam_jacobs_collection?and[]=c... Audio quality is decent here too.  Listening to &amp;#39;Fast Car&amp;#39; now, and the quality is solid. :) --- * Ben Folds Five: https://archive.org/details/@aadam_jacobs_collection?and[]=c... *…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users expressed skepticism regarding the logistics of recording 10,000 concerts over 42 years, noting it would require an average of five shows per week &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730910&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;... fan&amp;#39;s recordings of 10k concerts...&amp;#39; 59-year-old Aadam [sic] Jacobs made his first recording 42 years ago in 1984 when he was 17. He would have had to average 238 recordings/concerts per year — nearly 5/week — over those 42 years to accumulate 10,000 of them.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, though others suggest this total may include opening acts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730965&quot; title=&quot;they may count the opening acts as separate concerts&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. To further improve the archive, it was recommended that the volunteers consult with experts like Charlie Miller, who are known for their &amp;#34;audio magic&amp;#34; on the Grateful Dead archives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730163&quot; title=&quot;The team needs to talk to Charlie miller et al, the ones who have been cleaning up and posting the grateful dead archive for the last few decades. They are audio magicians.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://werwolv.net/posts/usb_for_sw_devs/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;USB for Software Developers: An introduction to writing userspace USB drivers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (werwolv.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695012&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;408 points · 48 comments · by WerWolv&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This guide introduces software developers to writing userspace USB drivers using the **libusb** library, bypassing complex kernel code. It explains core concepts like enumeration, descriptors, and endpoint transfer types (Control, Bulk, Interrupt, Isochronous) through a practical tutorial on communicating with an Android device via the Fastboot protocol. &lt;a href=&quot;https://werwolv.net/posts/usb_for_sw_devs/&quot; title=&quot;Title: USB for Software Developers | WerWolv    URL Source: https://werwolv.net/posts/usb_for_sw_devs/    Published Time: Wed, 08 Apr 2026 21:18:02 GMT    Markdown Content:  # USB for Software Developers | WerWolv    [![Image 1: Logo](https://werwolv.net/_astro/logo.DEhQfU2o_Z1Xz9D9.webp)](https://werwolv.net/)    [Posts](https://werwolv.net/posts)[Projects](https://werwolv.net/projects)    Search  Exact ESC    [](https://werwolv.net/atom.xml &amp;#39;RSS Feed&amp;#39;)     Overview     *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Userspace USB drivers are primarily valued for their portability via libusb and for bypassing the complex, restrictive driver-signing requirements on Windows &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695871&quot; title=&quot;Things which are relatively standard tend to get good generic support: Ethernet devices will generally be USB/CDC/ECM or RNDIS, for example. That may Just Work (tm) if it has the right descriptors. The userland approach is much more useful for weird or custom devices. In particular, on Windows you can do one of these user space &amp;#39;drivers&amp;#39; without having to bother with driver signing, and if you use libusb it will be portable too. (I maintain a small USB DFU based tool for work)&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47696269&quot; title=&quot;Driver signing is a killer issue on Windows; if you put your machine into dev/unsigned mode you get an ugly banner that can&amp;#39;t be turned off. Much easier to design the device to avoid that. E.g. by abusing USB-HID. The desktop USB missile launcher toy is USB HID, for example.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While critics argue that these &amp;#34;drivers&amp;#34; are often just libraries that lack native integration with kernel subsystems like Ethernet, proponents suggest using tun/tap devices or specialized tools for custom hardware like MIDI controllers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695592&quot; title=&quot;But this kinda expects that your USB driver is the application code too, no? This is less of a driver and more of a library + program. If I have, say, a USB to Ethernet device, how do I hook this into the ethernet adapter subsystem?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695670&quot; title=&quot;On Linux you could create a tun/tap device from your application and translate data sent over that to requests sent to the ethernet adapter. Of course, when you&amp;#39;re doing these things in userspace you either need some way of communicating with the Kernel or for the other subsystems to be in userspace as well.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47697239&quot; title=&quot;Perfect timing.  I&amp;#39;m expecting to get my hands on a MOTU MIDI Express XT from my local Guitar Center within the next couple days (I paid for it when it arrived there a couple weeks ago, but they have a mandatory waiting period on used equipment to make sure it ain&amp;#39;t stolen), which unfortunately uses some weird proprietary protocol instead of class-compliant MIDI-over-USB — so any use over USB from my PCs (nearly all of which are running Linux, OpenBSD, Haiku, or something other than Windows or…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. However, implementation challenges remain, such as security restrictions on macOS that prevent overriding system-recognized devices and the inherent difficulty of bridging userspace code with kernel-level networking &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695670&quot; title=&quot;On Linux you could create a tun/tap device from your application and translate data sent over that to requests sent to the ethernet adapter. Of course, when you&amp;#39;re doing these things in userspace you either need some way of communicating with the Kernel or for the other subsystems to be in userspace as well.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47698608&quot; title=&quot;Nice article, happen to have been working on a usbip system for my Macbook M3 using similar tech. Worth noting that, this approach is limitted on newer macOS systems: can&amp;#39;t build libusb &amp;#39;userspace USB drivers&amp;#39; for devices that are supported by macOS. Without manually disabling some Security features, can&amp;#39;t override drivers for system-recognized USB devices.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://flight-viz.com/cockpit.html?lat=40.64&amp;amp;lon=-73.78&amp;amp;alt=3000&amp;amp;hdg=220&amp;amp;spd=130&amp;amp;cs=DAL123&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Every plane you see in the sky – you can now follow it from the cockpit in 3D&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (flight-viz.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47694064&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;375 points · 71 comments · by coolwulf&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Flight Viz is a new web-based tool that utilizes satellite imagery and real-time data to allow users to track any active flight through an immersive 3D cockpit perspective. &lt;a href=&quot;https://flight-viz.com/cockpit.html?lat=40.64&amp;lon=-73.78&amp;alt=3000&amp;hdg=220&amp;spd=130&amp;cs=DAL123&quot; title=&quot;Title: Flight Viz — Cockpit View    URL Source: https://flight-viz.com/cockpit.html?lat=40.64&amp;amp;lon=-73.78&amp;amp;alt=3000&amp;amp;hdg=220&amp;amp;spd=130&amp;amp;cs=DAL123    Published Time: Sun, 12 Apr 2026 16:54:32 GMT    Warning: This is a cached snapshot of the original page, consider retry with caching opt-out.    Markdown Content:  Data provided by:    [×](https://flight-viz.com/cockpit.html?lat=40.64&amp;amp;lon=-73.78&amp;amp;alt=3000&amp;amp;hdg=220&amp;amp;spd=130&amp;amp;cs=DAL123)    *   Google    *   Data SIO, NOAA, U.S. Navy, NGA, GEBCO    *   IBCAO    *   [![Image 1:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users generally praised the project&amp;#39;s visual appeal and immersive &amp;#34;cockpit&amp;#34; perspective, though some noted that the current implementation is a moving viewpoint rather than a rendered aircraft interior &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47694065&quot; title=&quot;Creator here. I posted Flight-Viz a few days ago ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47603966 ) and the feedback was great. Since then I added a cockpit mode that follows any liveflight with real 3D terrain. How to try it: go to flight-viz.com, click any plane, then click &amp;#39;Cockpit&amp;#39; in the action buttons. You&amp;#39;ll get a first-person view wit h real buildings, terrain, atmosphere, and a HUD showing altitude/speed/heading — all driven by live ADS-B data. Hao&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738318&quot; title=&quot;Is anyone actually seeing a cockpit? All I&amp;#39;m seeing is a moving viewpoint (no plane, no cockpit...) I mean, it&amp;#39;s cool, it&amp;#39;s just not quite what I expected from &amp;#39;cockpit mode&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47694183&quot; title=&quot;The FlightRadar24 app has had this feature for quite some time. I like your implementation though - it’s very easy on the eye.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant feedback focused on UI friction, specifically the difficulty of finding the cockpit button, broken navigation when exiting the view, and mobile usability issues &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734075&quot; title=&quot;Can you make it so &amp;#39;exit cockpit&amp;#39; navigates to a route rather than execute a back on the browser, as it takes me back to the hacker news page when I push it. Also took me about 5 minutes to find the cockpit view button after I&amp;#39;d selected a flight but that might be a me problem :)&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732976&quot; title=&quot;This is so cool. But on iOS, clicking the plane flashes the mini modal/popup but the it immediately disappears. There no way, on touch, to keep it open long enough to click a cockpit view button, assuming there is one.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47733035&quot; title=&quot;This is so impressive, love it! A bit of feedback:  Clicking exit cockpit goes back to the previous page (in this case this HN thread). Not sure if just me, but I really had to search hard for the actions under menu and the cockpit button.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While the tool is lauded for its beauty, users requested expanded coverage for smaller airports and non-commercial aircraft, as well as the ability to view historical flight data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47734587&quot; title=&quot;Gorgeous! I can search flights at LAX but I don&amp;#39;t see the smaller airports around it like SNA or LGB listed. Any chance those could be added? Also, is there by chance a way to do historical flights?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47732639&quot; title=&quot;I wish it had all the small aircraft not just commercial flights&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-04-07</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-04-07</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/07/trump-iran-war-ceasefire&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;US and Iran agree to provisional ceasefire&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theguardian.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47682276&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;604 points · &lt;strong&gt;2031 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by g-b-r&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The United States and Iran have reached a provisional ceasefire agreement aimed at ending hostilities and reopening the Strait of Hormuz following a period of intense military conflict. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/07/trump-iran-war-ceasefire&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.reuters.com&amp;amp;#x2F;world&amp;amp;#x2F;iran-war-live-tehran-rejects-ceasefire-deal-trumps-deadline-reopen-strait-hormuz-2026-04-07&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.reuters.com&amp;amp;#x2F;world&amp;amp;#x2F;iran-war-live-tehran-rejects-c...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The proposed ceasefire has sparked debate over whether the terms represent a strategic victory for Iran or a desperate concession following the destruction of its military and nuclear infrastructure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47683643&quot; title=&quot;I don’t see how the majority of comments paint this as a victory for Iran. Your entire formal military apparatus was destroyed, nuclear sites in rubble, defense industrial complex leveled, two levels of leadership KIA, and the only thing preventing you from permanent destruction or regime change is an impotent threat of attacking ships? I guess I’m missing something. War sucks but in this case Iran is a shell of the threat it was a month ago.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47683525&quot; title=&quot;Yikes, so basically Iran gets everything it wants. It paid a heavy price for it, but it would get so much out of this. At pre war ship rates, that toll would be ~$90B per year ($45B if split half with Oman). Iran&amp;#39;s government generates something like $40B in income, so this would be absolutely monumental.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue the agreement leaves Iran in a stronger financial and political position by securing sanctions relief and potential transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47683525&quot; title=&quot;Yikes, so basically Iran gets everything it wants. It paid a heavy price for it, but it would get so much out of this. At pre war ship rates, that toll would be ~$90B per year ($45B if split half with Oman). Iran&amp;#39;s government generates something like $40B in income, so this would be absolutely monumental.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47682947&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;We received a 10 point proposal from Iran, and believe it is a workable basis on which to negotiate. Almost all of the various points of past contention have been agreed to between the United States and Iran, but a two week period will allow the Agreement to be finalized and consummated.&amp;#39; The ten point plan which had previously been rejected outright? The 10-point plan which leaves Iran in an incredibly better financial position? So, apart from blowing up children, what did the US gain out of…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47685211&quot; title=&quot;This is basically a win for Iran. 1. They replaced the decrepit Khameini with a much younger and more formidable Khameini. 2. “Pulled a Ukraine” vs the US showing defiance and have now rallied any wavering regime supporters against the American and Jewish “devils”. 3. Reminded the anti regime population that they’re not going anywhere and that the US can’t help them. 4. Showed everyone in the ME and the world that if anyone messes with them they’ll close the straight. Then gas prices go up.…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the Gulf States will never accept Iranian control over global trade routes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47683980&quot; title=&quot;There will be no transit fee - I wouldn’t worry about that lol. Gulf States themselves will go to war over it because they sure as hell aren’t paying Iran so that they can sell oil on the free market. Freedom of navigation is a core global principal and Iran has no legitimate right to stop other countries from trade. If you think they do, then everybody else gets to as well, and to that end we will just seize the ships and charge even more. It’s an incredibly stupid idea and the fact that folks…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Discrepancies also exist regarding the specific terms of the 10-point plan, with conflicting reports on whether it focuses on maritime tolls or broader demands like the withdrawal of U.S. forces and recognition of nuclear rights &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47682840&quot; title=&quot;Iran&amp;#39;s 10-point plan includes: 1. Guarantee that Iran will not be attacked again 2. Permanent end to the war, not just a ceasefire 3. End to Israeli strikes in Lebanon 4. Lifting of all US sanctions on Iran 5. End to all regional fighting against Iranian allies 6. In return, Iran would open the Strait of Hormuz 7. Iran would impose a Hormuz fee of $2 million per ship 8. Iran would split these fees with Oman 9. Iran to provide rules for safe passage through Hormuz 10. Iran to use Hormuz fees for…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47683720&quot; title=&quot;Iran&amp;#39;s semi-official Mehr News Agency (via China&amp;#39;s state news agency Xinhua[0]) claims the 10 points are: 1. U.S. commitment to ensure no further acts of aggression 2. Continued Iranian control of the Strait of Hormuz 3. Acceptance of Iran&amp;#39;s nuclear enrichment rights 4. Lifting of all primary sanctions 5. Lifting of all secondary sanctions 6. Termination of all United Nations Security Council resolutions against Iran 7. Termination of all International Atomic Energy Agency Board of Governors…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/glasswing&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (anthropic.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47679121&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1538 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 834 comments · by Ryan5453&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic has launched Project Glasswing, an initiative focused on leveraging AI to identify and fix vulnerabilities in critical software infrastructure to enhance global cybersecurity. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/glasswing&quot; title=&quot;Related: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Assessing Claude Mythos Preview&amp;amp;#x27;s cybersecurity capabilities&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47679155&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47679155&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;System Card: Claude Mythos Preview [pdf]&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47679258&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47679258&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Also: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Anthropic&amp;amp;#x27;s Project Glasswing sounds necessary to me&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic’s decision to restrict the &amp;#34;Mythos&amp;#34; model to select partners like the Linux Foundation has sparked criticism that they are gatekeeping economic and security benefits for industry heavyweights rather than acting as a public benefit corporation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47680782&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s messed up that Anthropic simultaneously claims to be a public benefit copro and is also picking who gets to benefit from their newly enhanced cybersecurity capabilities. It means that the economic benefit is going to the existing industry heavyweights. (And no, the Linux Foundation being in the list doesn&amp;#39;t imply broad benefit to OSS. Linux Foundation has an agenda and will pick who benefits according to what is good for them.) I think it would be net better for the public if they just…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users view the model&amp;#39;s reported ability to identify Linux kernel vulnerabilities as a potential &amp;#34;leveling of the playing field&amp;#34; against commercial spyware, others dismiss these claims as &amp;#34;marketing puffery&amp;#34; or nonsensical bug reporting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47679745&quot; title=&quot;Now, its very possible that this is Anthropic marketing puffery, but even if it is half  true it still represents an incredible advancement in hunting vulnerabilities. It will be interesting to see where this goes.  If its actually this good, and Apple and Google apply it to their mobile OS codebases, it could wipe out the commercial spyware industry, forcing them to rely more on hacking humans rather than hacking mobile OSes.  My assumption has been for years that companies like NSO Group have…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47683200&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Mythos Preview identified a number of Linux kernel vulnerabilities that allow an adversary to write out-of-bounds (e.g., through a buffer overflow, use-after-free, or double-free vulnerability.) Many of these were remotely-triggerable. However, even after several thousand scans over the repository, because of the Linux kernel’s defense in depth measures Mythos Preview was unable to successfully exploit any of these. Do they really need to include this garbage which is seemingly just designed…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant debate also surrounds Anthropic&amp;#39;s inclusion of a clinical psychiatrist&amp;#39;s assessment in the system card, with commenters divided on whether the model&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;neurotic&amp;#34; traits suggest emerging sapience or represent a bizarre distraction from its technical capabilities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47679877&quot; title=&quot;https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/53566bf5440a10affd749724787c89... &amp;#39;5.10 External assessment from a clinical psychiatrist&amp;#39; is a new section in this system card. Why are Anthropic like this? &amp;gt;We remain deeply uncertain about whether Claude has experiences or interests that matter morally, and about how to investigate or address these questions, but we believe it is increasingly important to try. We also report independent evaluations from an external research organization and a clinical…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47680059&quot; title=&quot;A thought experiment: It&amp;#39;s April, 1991. Magically, some interface to Claude materialises in London. Do you think most people would think it was a sentient life form? How much do you think the interface matters - what if it looks like an android, or like a horse, or like a large bug, or a keyboard on wheels? I don&amp;#39;t come down particularly hard on either side of the model sapience discussion, but I don&amp;#39;t think dismissing either direction out of hand is the right call.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/53566bf5440a10affd749724787c8913a2ae0841.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;System Card: Claude Mythos Preview [pdf]&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (www-cdn.anthropic.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47679258&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;845 points · 656 comments · by be7a&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic has released a system card for Claude Mythos Preview detailing the model&amp;#39;s advanced cybersecurity capabilities and the safety evaluations conducted to mitigate risks in software security. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/53566bf5440a10affd749724787c8913a2ae0841.pdf&quot; title=&quot;Related: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47679121&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47679121&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Assessing Claude Mythos Preview&amp;amp;#x27;s cybersecurity capabilities&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47679155&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47679155&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Claude Mythos preview demonstrates a massive leap in performance across benchmarks like SWE-bench and USAMO, leading some to call the jump in capability &amp;#34;insane&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;outrageous&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47679345&quot; title=&quot;Combined results (Claude Mythos / Claude Opus 4.6 / GPT-5.4 / Gemini 3.1 Pro) SWE-bench Verified:        93.9% / 80.8% / —     / 80.6%    SWE-bench Pro:             77.8% / 53.4% / 57.7% / 54.2%    SWE-bench Multilingual:    87.3% / 77.8% / —     / —    SWE-bench Multimodal:      59.0% / 27.1% / —     / —    Terminal-Bench 2.0:        82.0% / 65.4% / 75.1% / 68.5%      GPQA Diamond:              94.5% / 91.3% / 92.8% / 94.3%    MMMLU:                     92.7% / 91.1% / —     / 92.6–93.6%    USAMO:    …&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47679522&quot; title=&quot;Haven&amp;#39;t seen a jump this large since I don&amp;#39;t even know, years?  Too bad they are not releasing it anytime soon (there is no need as they are still currently the leader).&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47679493&quot; title=&quot;isn&amp;#39;t this insane? why aren&amp;#39;t people freaking out? the jump in capability is outrageous. anyone?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. However, Anthropic’s decision to withhold the model from general availability has sparked significant debate; while the company cites alignment risks and the dangers of navigating &amp;#34;more difficult climbs,&amp;#34; some users suspect the move is driven by high operational costs or a shift toward exclusive, high-tier corporate access &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47679901&quot; title=&quot;A jump that we will never be able to use since we&amp;#39;re not part of the seemingly minimum 100 billion dollar company club as requirement to be allowed to use it. I get the security aspect, but if we&amp;#39;ve hit that point any reasonably sophisticated model past this point will be able to do the damage they claim it can do. They might as well be telling us they&amp;#39;re closing up shop for consumer models. They should just say they&amp;#39;ll never release a model of this caliber to the public at this point and say…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47679363&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Claude Mythos Preview’s large increase in capabilities has led us to decide not to make it generally available. A month ago I might have believed this, now I assume that they know they can&amp;#39;t handle the demand for the prices they&amp;#39;re advertising.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47679561&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Claude Mythos Preview is, on essentially every dimension we can measure, the best-aligned model that we have released to date by a significant margin. We believe that it does not have any significant coherent misaligned goals, and its character traits in typical conversations closely follow the goals we laid out in our constitution. Even so, we believe that it likely poses the greatest alignment-related risk of any model we have released to date. How can these claims all be true at once?…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. This lack of public access has fueled theories that as models approach AGI, companies will stop renting them out for consumer prices and instead use them to bootstrap their own internal goals or engage in &amp;#34;rent-seeking&amp;#34; with hand-picked partners &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47680056&quot; title=&quot;More than killer AI I&amp;#39;m afraid of Anthropic/OpenAI going into full rent-seeking mode so that everyone working in tech is forced to fork out loads of money just to stay competitive on the market. These companies can also choose to give exclusive access to hand picked individuals and cut everyone else off and there would be nothing to stop them. This is already happening to some degree, GPT 5.3 Codex&amp;#39;s security capabilities were given exclusively to those who were approved for a &amp;#39;Trusted Access&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47679544&quot; title=&quot;At what point do these companies stop releasing models and just use them to bootstrap AGI for themselves?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47681097&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve long maintained that the real indicator that AGI is imminent is that public availability stops being a thing. If you truly believed you had a superhuman, godlike mind in your thrall, renting it out for $20/month would be the last thing you would choose to do with it.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nasa.gov/gallery/lunar-flyby/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Lunar Flyby&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nasa.gov)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47676509&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;964 points · 247 comments · by kipi&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NASA has released historic images from the Artemis II lunar flyby on April 6, 2026, featuring the first human views of the Moon’s far side and a rare in-space solar eclipse captured by the crew during their seven-hour pass. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nasa.gov/gallery/lunar-flyby/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Artemis II Lunar Flyby - NASA    URL Source: https://www.nasa.gov/gallery/lunar-flyby/    Published Time: 2026-04-07T13:11:10Z    Markdown Content:  # Artemis II Lunar Flyby - NASA    [![Image 1: NASA Logo](https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/themes/nasa/assets/images/nasa-logo@2x.png)](https://www.nasa.gov/)    *   Explore    Search     [![Image 2: NASA Logo](https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/themes/nasa/assets/images/nasa-logo@2x.png)](https://www.nasa.gov/)    *   News &amp;amp; Events      [### News &amp;amp;…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Artemis lunar flyby has sparked a mix of inspiration and skepticism, with some users finding the high-resolution, modern imagery more stirring and &amp;#34;uncanny&amp;#34; than previous Apollo-era artifacts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47682173&quot; title=&quot;There is something uncanny about the bandwidth and quality of all the artifacts coming from this mission. I&amp;#39;ve subsisted on photos from the Apollo missions and artistic renditions for so long that seeing the modern, high resolution real thing to be quite stirring in a way I didn&amp;#39;t expect. It actually does make me believe that the future could be quite cool.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47682167&quot; title=&quot;We&amp;#39;re so not accustomed to moon pictures taken with &amp;#39;normal&amp;#39; cameras. These almost look like 3D renders to me, it&amp;#39;s incredible&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While the $4 billion per-launch cost is criticized as a product of political &amp;#34;pork&amp;#34; and inefficiency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47681586&quot; title=&quot;I have to admit, I&amp;#39;ve been an Artemis hater ($4 billion per launch lol) but the experience of watching people go back around the Moon has been incredibly inspiring, and it proves to me that maybe we can still do hard things&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47682566&quot; title=&quot;The absolute cost isn&amp;#39;t the problem, it&amp;#39;s the value that we&amp;#39;re getting from it. SLS and Artemis are both incredibly expensive and ramshackle programs, and regardless of how bad the rest of the USG might be in terms of their cost, or value, if you are a true space fan and a true American space fan, you should want this little corner of humanity to hold itself to a higher standard. Acceptance of over costing and under delivering is exactly why the US is stuck with SpaceX as its prime space launch…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue this expense is negligible compared to US debt interest or defense spending &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47681816&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; $4 billion per launch lol The US spends almost that much on net debt interest each day (~$3 billion/day[0]). Not that adding to the debt helps at all, but the old proverb about being penny wise and pound foolish seems relevant 0. https://www.cbo.gov/publication/61951&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47681939&quot; title=&quot;Also we spend that much every 4 days we&amp;#39;re in Iran, and that&amp;#39;s only ONE of our neo-colonialist irons in the fire, as it were. If you want to make the US financially solvent, cut defense. Defense LAPS every other budget category. Whether you want to take the conservative position on why that is (our allies freeload on our defense spending) or the Progressive one (the U.S. is an empire in decline and every major empire through history has spent vast sums to maintain itself why would the U.S. be…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Debates also persist regarding NASA’s reliance on commercial providers like SpaceX, with some viewing it as a failure of public programs and others as a successful, intentional strategy to foster innovation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47682566&quot; title=&quot;The absolute cost isn&amp;#39;t the problem, it&amp;#39;s the value that we&amp;#39;re getting from it. SLS and Artemis are both incredibly expensive and ramshackle programs, and regardless of how bad the rest of the USG might be in terms of their cost, or value, if you are a true space fan and a true American space fan, you should want this little corner of humanity to hold itself to a higher standard. Acceptance of over costing and under delivering is exactly why the US is stuck with SpaceX as its prime space launch…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47683560&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; is exactly why the US is stuck with SpaceX For the last 20 years NASA has intentionally run their Commercial Crew Program, which has the stated goal of developing/fostering/funding the development of commercial providers for launch vehicles. They, by plan they explicitly laid out and implemented, decided to rely on American commercial providers. And that&amp;#39;s what they got. And in doing so, the program ended up producing the most prolific/successful launch vehicle in history. &amp;gt;&amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s only…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://idiocracy.wtf/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Are We Idiocracy Yet?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (idiocracy.wtf)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47672818&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;637 points · 546 comments · by jdiiufccuskal&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#34;Idiocracy Proximity Index&amp;#34; compares modern reality to the 2006 film *Idiocracy*, citing declining IQ scores, corporate-branded education, and the rise of entertainment-driven politics as evidence that society is rapidly mirroring the movie&amp;#39;s dystopian premise. &lt;a href=&quot;https://idiocracy.wtf/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Are We Idiocracy Yet?    URL Source: https://idiocracy.wtf/    Markdown Content:  ⚠️ BREAKING: ELECTROLYTES CONFIRMED AS WHAT PLANTS CRAVE • COSTCO LAW SCHOOL NOW ACCEPTING APPLICATIONS • UPGRADE TO BRAWNDO PREMIUM FOR EXTRA ELECTROLYTES • REHABILITATION SEASON 47 PREMIERS TUESDAY • BROUGHT TO YOU BY CARL&amp;#39;S JR • MONDAY NIGHT REHABILITATION RATINGS AT ALL-TIME HIGH • SECRETARY OF STATE SPONSORED BY MOUNTAIN DEW • IF YOU DON&amp;#39;T SMOKE TARRYLTONS YOU&amp;#39;RE STUPID •    Tracking how close reality is to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters debate whether *Idiocracy* is a prophetic satire or a problematic trope, with one attendee of an early screening noting that the original test audience felt personally insulted by the film&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;idiot&amp;#34; characters &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673539&quot; title=&quot;I attended an audience testing screener for Idiocracy before the film&amp;#39;s final edit. I could not believe my eyes and ears, I loved it unlike anything I&amp;#39;d seen before, it was the hardest US culture satire I&amp;#39;d seen up to that point. Then the lights came up and the audience started giving their reviews, in an open mike fashion. They all identified with the &amp;#39;idiots&amp;#39; and were indignant insulted, and angry. I remember making eye contact with Mike Judge like &amp;#39;WTF!&amp;#39; It was an early screener and I think…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673870&quot; title=&quot;I feel Idiocracy is irresistible bait for &amp;#39;not like the other girls&amp;#39;-types. Everytime this movie comes up, droves of people mention how they get it, while others don&amp;#39;t. It&amp;#39;s becoming a trope in itself.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. A central point of contention is the film&amp;#39;s eugenics-based premise; critics argue that societal decline is driven by cultural incentives and education rather than genetics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673255&quot; title=&quot;Idiocracy hit a lot of superficial/thematic nails on the head with its silliness. &amp;#39;Don&amp;#39;t Look Up&amp;#39; captures a lot more of the actual dynamics. Instead of anti-eugenics making brains feeble, the people are just normal humans made stupid by their cultural environment, incentives and suchlike.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673542&quot; title=&quot;I always have a problem when folks bring up idiocracy because the of the eugenics angle. It’s extremely unlikely that people are getting inherently stupider, just less educated. The former is some sort of prophecy of doom and the latter is actually actionable.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673590&quot; title=&quot;Fair point, but why jump to genetics instead of culture (upbringing)?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673669&quot; title=&quot;Because the film itself implies that the idiocracy is due to stupid people breeding more, a classic tenet of Nazism and eugenics alike&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, though some point to declining IQ scores as a counter-indicator &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673610&quot; title=&quot;Not claiming that Idiocracy is accurate, however IQ scores have been declining. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/search/research-news/3283/&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also touches on modern satire like *The Onion*, with users disagreeing over whether repetitive political commentary remains a sharp tool for activism or has become &amp;#34;lazy&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;exhausting&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673743&quot; title=&quot;It breaks my heart when I hear people outraged about Onion stories, not because that they fall for them, but because they know they have a hard time telling truth from fiction.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47674210&quot; title=&quot;I think people don&amp;#39;t like Onion stories because they&amp;#39;re not funny, they&amp;#39;re just pretentious and political. For instance, their famous &amp;#39;No Way to Prevent This,&amp;#39; Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens article they post all over their page whenever there is some high profile gun related crime. It&amp;#39;s all over their page and no doubt they get a bump in traffic from smug people who feel it&amp;#39;s clever. It&amp;#39;s just so exhausting. It was a great headline, but by the time the joke gets its own…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47674316&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not in the USA, but I think the issue is not so much the joke getting tiresome, but the repeat school shootings. Maybe if there was work done to stop the shootings, then the joke wouldn&amp;#39;t keep getting repeated.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sam-burns.com/posts/concrete-laptop-stand/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Brutalist Concrete Laptop Stand (2024)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sam-burns.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673360&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;786 points · 238 comments · by sam-bee&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sam Burns designed and built a brutalist-style concrete laptop stand featuring integrated USB ports, a power socket, a plant pot, and intentional &amp;#34;urban decay&amp;#34; aesthetics like rusted rebar and weathered textures. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sam-burns.com/posts/concrete-laptop-stand/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Concrete Laptop Stand    URL Source: https://sam-burns.com/posts/concrete-laptop-stand/    Published Time: 2024-04-27T12:00:00+01:00    Markdown Content:  I am a great lover of brutalist architecture. 1960’s concrete buildings may not be for everyone, but I love the aesthetic. I’ve made a laptop stand, to help me hack in true brutalist style. It has the characteristic _beton brut_ (raw concrete) surface texture, and is quite possibly the heaviest laptop stand in the world. It also boasts 2 x…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users appreciate the project&amp;#39;s aesthetic and the creator&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;just because&amp;#34; motivation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47675046&quot; title=&quot;I wonder what the practical limit is on how thin and light you can make concrete for non-structural items? I can see someone selling concrete mugs on Etsy, for example. Maybe with clever use of fillers and thin walls you could have a version of this you could actually lift. It looks great, especially in contrast to a white IKEA-style office. Re: decay, I regret not taking more photos of the final days of the RBS &amp;#39;Ziggurat&amp;#39;: https://www.edinburghlive.co.uk/news/edinburgh-news/stark-ph... ; at…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47676537&quot; title=&quot;Do I like it? No. Do I want one on my desk? Absolutely not. Do I think it&amp;#39;s even brutalist? Not in the least. But it&amp;#39;s still a cool as hell project. People need to do more things just because they want to, and to hell with what anyone else thinks.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, critics argue that the ornamental &amp;#34;urban decay&amp;#34; and lack of utility contradict the core principles of brutalism &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47675838&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t like it, from a pure brutalistic view point this obviously doesn&amp;#39;t make any sense, it isn&amp;#39;t practical and it doesn&amp;#39;t make any effort to create a shape that is esthetically pleasing. The urban decay is even more outrageous, the whole appeal of urban decay is that it is &amp;#39;real&amp;#39;, it&amp;#39;s the thinking about all of people that went through the same structure throughout the years. Of cause it doesn&amp;#39;t mean you can&amp;#39;t make art about or featuring urban decay, but you have to be smart about it.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47674191&quot; title=&quot;Isn&amp;#39;t the ornamental &amp;#39;urban decay&amp;#39; detail kinda the opposite of the utilitarian and functional style of brutalism?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Concerns were raised regarding the practical weight of the stand, with warnings that it could damage weaker desks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673777&quot; title=&quot;There are some subtly weak desks out there, quite a few actually, where placing this on top could be brutal.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47674552&quot; title=&quot;There are some subtly weak floors out there, where placing such a desk could be fatal.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also touched on technical interests, such as the unique keyboard layout shown in the photos and the specific cement-casting techniques used &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47675248&quot; title=&quot;Related: Anyone know where to get that kind of keyboard in the photo? Specifically, where the number pad and arrow keys are on the left? I&amp;#39;ve been looking and looking, but the best I can find is using a narrow keyboard with a separate number-pad only keyboard on the left. I&amp;#39;m in the US. (It&amp;#39;s better for your right shoulder to keep the mouse closer to your body like in the picture.)&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47675086&quot; title=&quot;I certainly haven&amp;#39;t heard of that technique to get rid of bubbles in the cement.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://z.ai/blog/glm-5.1&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GLM-5.1: Towards Long-Horizon Tasks&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (z.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677853&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;617 points · 262 comments · by zixuanlimit&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GLM-5.1 is a next-generation flagship model designed for long-horizon agentic engineering, achieving state-of-the-art performance on software tasks like SWE-Bench Pro by sustaining productivity and self-correction over thousands of tool calls and hundreds of iterations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://z.ai/blog/glm-5.1&quot; title=&quot;Title: GLM-5.1: Towards Long-Horizon Tasks    URL Source: https://z.ai/blog/glm-5.1    Published Time: Wed, 08 Apr 2026 04:45:13 GMT    Markdown Content:  GLM-5.1 is our next-generation flagship model for agentic engineering, with significantly stronger coding capabilities than its predecessor. It achieves state-of-the-art performance on SWE-Bench Pro and leads GLM-5 by a wide margin on NL2Repo (repo generation) and Terminal-Bench 2.0 (real-world terminal tasks).    ### Complex Software Engineering…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of GLM-5.1 has sparked debate over whether proprietary models like those from OpenAI and Anthropic still hold a competitive moat, with some arguing that local inference is the inevitable future &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47682706&quot; title=&quot;Every single day, three things are becoming more and more clear: (1) OpenAI &amp;amp; Anthropic are absolutely cooked; it&amp;#39;s obvious they have no moat      (2) Local/private inference is the future of AI      (3) There&amp;#39;s *still* no killer product yet (so get to work!)&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47682874&quot; title=&quot;What benefit is there to dropping $50k on GPUs to run this personally besides being a cool enthusiast project?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find the model&amp;#39;s coding capabilities on par with or superior to Claude Opus &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47678730&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m on their pro plan and I respectfully disagree - it&amp;#39;s genuinely excellent with GLM 5.1 so long as you remember to /compact once it hits around 100k tokens. At that point it&amp;#39;s pretty much broken and entirely unusable, but if you keep context under about 100k it&amp;#39;s genuinely on par with Opus for me, and in some ways it&amp;#39;s arguably better.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47678609&quot; title=&quot;To be honest I am a bit sad as, glm5.1 is producing mich better typescript than opus or codex imo, but no matter what it does sometimes go into shizo mode at some point over longer contexts. Not always tho I have had multiple session go over 200k and be fine.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others report significant &amp;#34;schizo mode&amp;#34; degradation, including gibberish and Chinese character injection, once the context window exceeds 100k tokens &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47678480&quot; title=&quot;I am on their &amp;#39;Coding Lite&amp;#39; plan, which I got a lot of use out of for a few months, but it has been seriously gimped now.  Obvious quantization issues, going in circles, flipping from X to !X, injecting chinese characters.  It is useless now for any serious coding work.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47678279&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s an okay model. My biggest issue using GLM 5.1 in OpenCode is that it loses coherency over longer contexts. When you crest 128k tokens, there&amp;#39;s a high chance that the model will start spouting gibberish until you compact the history. For short-term bugfixing and tweaks though, it does about what I&amp;#39;d expect from Sonnet for a pretty low price.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47678609&quot; title=&quot;To be honest I am a bit sad as, glm5.1 is producing mich better typescript than opus or codex imo, but no matter what it does sometimes go into shizo mode at some point over longer contexts. Not always tho I have had multiple session go over 200k and be fine.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these technical hurdles, the model demonstrated impressive autonomous problem-solving by exploiting a SQL injection vulnerability to fix a tennis court reservation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47679532&quot; title=&quot;My local tennis court&amp;#39;s reservation website was broken and I couldn&amp;#39;t cancel a reservation, and I asked GLM-5.1 if it can figure out the API. Five minutes later, I check and it had found a /cancel.php URL that accepted an ID but the ID wasn&amp;#39;t exposed anywhere, so it found and was exploiting a blind SQL injection vulnerability to find my reservation ID. Overeager, but I was really really impressed.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, fueling the sentiment that LLMs represent a historic shift in human achievement &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47682902&quot; title=&quot;No killer product? Coding assistants and LLM&amp;#39;s in general are the single most awe-inspiring achievement of humanity in my lifetime, technological or otherwise. They&amp;#39;ve already massively improved my and others&amp;#39; lives and they&amp;#39;re only going to get better. If pre and post industrial revolution used to be the major binary delineation of our history, I&amp;#39;m fairly confident it will soon be seen as pre and post AI instead.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.juxt.pro/blog/a-bug-on-the-dark-side-of-the-moon/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;We found an undocumented bug in the Apollo 11 guidance computer code&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (juxt.pro)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673005&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;438 points · 201 comments · by henrygarner&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Researchers discovered a 57-year-old undocumented bug in the Apollo 11 guidance computer code that could have silently disabled the spacecraft&amp;#39;s ability to realign its gyroscopes. The flaw, found using modern AI-driven formal verification, occurs when an emergency &amp;#34;caging&amp;#34; event fails to release a specific software resource lock. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.juxt.pro/blog/a-bug-on-the-dark-side-of-the-moon/&quot; title=&quot;Title: JUXT Blog: A bug on the dark side of the Moon    URL Source: https://www.juxt.pro/blog/a-bug-on-the-dark-side-of-the-moon/    Published Time: 2026-04-07    Markdown Content:  The Apollo Guidance Computer (AGC) is one of the most scrutinised codebases in history. Thousands of developers have read it. Academics have [published papers on its reliability](https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19750004273). Emulators run it instruction by instruction. We found a bug in it that had been missed for…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion is heavily divided over whether the article was written by an AI, with some users citing specific stylistic &amp;#34;tells&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673350&quot; title=&quot;Super interesting. I wish this article wasn’t written by an LLM though. It feels soulless and plastic.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673522&quot; title=&quot;Here&amp;#39;s one tell-tale of many: &amp;#39;No alarm, no program light.&amp;#39; Another one: &amp;#39;Two instructions are missing: [...] Four bytes.&amp;#39; One more: &amp;#39;The defensive coding hid the problem, but it didn’t eliminate it.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; while others argue those patterns are common in human technical writing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673595&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s just writing. I frequently write like that. This insistence that certain stylistics patterns are &amp;#39;tell-tale&amp;#39; signs that an article was written by AI makes no sense, particularly when you consider that whatever stylistic ticks an LLM may possess are a result of it being trained on human writing.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47674179&quot; title=&quot;Not to single out your comment, but it feels like it&amp;#39;s gotten to the point where HN could use a rule against complaining about AI generated content. It seems like almost every discussion has at least someone complaining about &amp;#39;AI slop&amp;#39; in either the original post or the comments.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these suspicions, automated detectors suggest the content is human-authored &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673593&quot; title=&quot;For what it’s worth, Pangram thinks this article is fully human-written: https://www.pangram.com/history/f5f68ce9-70ac-4c2b-b0c3-0ca8...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, and readers found the technical explanation of the bug&amp;#39;s failure scenario to be compelling &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47674634&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not even clear if AI was used to find the bug: they mention modeling the software with an &amp;#39;ai native&amp;#39; language, whatever that means. What is not clear is how they found themselves modeling the gyros software of the apollo code to begin with. But, I do think their explanation of the lock acquisition and the failure scenario is quite clear and compelling.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond the authorship debate, commenters recommended the *CuriousMarc* YouTube channel for deeper insights into Apollo hardware and noted that modern space missions are more risk-averse because we now recognize many more potential failure modes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47674745&quot; title=&quot;For anyone who liked this, I highly suggest you take a look at the CuriousMarc youtube channel, where he chronicles lots of efforts to preserve and understand several parts of the Apollo AGC, with a team of really technically competent and passionate collaborators. One of the more interesting things they have been working on, is a potential re-interpretation of the infamous 1202 alarm. It is, as of current writing, popularly described as something related to nonsensical readings of a sensor…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47674821&quot; title=&quot;And that&amp;#39;s why it&amp;#39;s harder (or easier?) to make the same landing again -- we taking way less chances. Today we know of way more failure modes than back then.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jola.dev/posts/dropping-cloudflare&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Dropping Cloudflare for Bunny.net&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jola.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47675013&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;415 points · 209 comments · by shintoist&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author explains their transition from Cloudflare to bunny.net, a European-based CDN, citing concerns over internet centralization and a desire for better performance and privacy through a paid, customer-focused service model. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jola.dev/posts/dropping-cloudflare&quot; title=&quot;Title: Dropping Cloudflare for bunny.net    URL Source: https://jola.dev/posts/dropping-cloudflare    Published Time: 2026-04-02    Markdown Content:  # Dropping Cloudflare for bunny.net |…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide between users who prefer Cloudflare’s robust free tier for hobbyist projects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47675953&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m currently running a SaaS on Cloudflare Workers + Pages. The developer experience is genuinely good, deploying serverless functions and static sites from the same repo has been seamless. But I hit a real issue recently: CDN edge caching served stale HTML after a deploy, and the service worker cached the bad response. Took a CDN purge from the dashboard to fix. The debugging experience when things go wrong at the edge is painful, you&amp;#39;re always guessing which cache layer is the problem. That…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47675321&quot; title=&quot;I’ve mainly been using cloudflare for the very excellent (and free) premium DNS offering. Easy upload of bind test files  Flattened CNAME to support naked domains   Robust free role based permissions to add other ppl Anyone have suggestions for moving a stack of domains, many being little community and hobby projects away from cloudflare for a small overall price. Agency pricing like migadu offers for email on custom domains is what I have in mind. https://www.migadu.com/pricing/&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt; and those who favor Bunny.net’s paid model to avoid the risks of sudden pricing shifts or &amp;#34;free-to-paid&amp;#34; transitions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47675778&quot; title=&quot;I use bunny.net for CDN and DNS. I don&amp;#39;t like free offerings, because what if they decide to charge someday? What if someone decides &amp;#39;free is not feasible, we start charging $20 per instance now&amp;#39;. I&amp;#39;d rather have a low fee now, a change from $2 to $3 is more likely and that&amp;#39;s fine for me. But from free to not free is risky for me. I also like smaller, independent-ish  ompanies that actually care about developers. That&amp;#39;s why I use bunny.net, transistor.fm, Plausible Analytics.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics point out that the original blog post lacks transparency by using undisclosed affiliate links &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47675475&quot; title=&quot;In the interests of transparent disclosure on such a positive blog post, It might be worth calling out that all the links on the page are all linked to the Bunny Affiliate Program. [1] [1] https://bunny.net/affiliate/&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, potentially violating advertising guidelines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47675589&quot; title=&quot;Yeah IANAL, but this sort of endorsement with undisclosed remuneration would probably run afoul of FTC guidelines, which is why you see disclaimers like &amp;#39;As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases&amp;#39; everywhere. The author seems to live in the UK, but a cursory search suggests there&amp;#39;s something similar there as well.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some praise Bunny.net for its developer-friendly focus &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47675778&quot; title=&quot;I use bunny.net for CDN and DNS. I don&amp;#39;t like free offerings, because what if they decide to charge someday? What if someone decides &amp;#39;free is not feasible, we start charging $20 per instance now&amp;#39;. I&amp;#39;d rather have a low fee now, a change from $2 to $3 is more likely and that&amp;#39;s fine for me. But from free to not free is risky for me. I also like smaller, independent-ish  ompanies that actually care about developers. That&amp;#39;s why I use bunny.net, transistor.fm, Plausible Analytics.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others warn of proprietary lock-in with its SDK &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677223&quot; title=&quot;Cloudflare is not a CDN anymore but the workers edge platform, if you can move to bunny.net, you were not really using cloudflare. I don&amp;#39;t understand how none of the alternatives really embrace WinterTC If i see something horrific like: import * as BunnySDK from &amp;#39;@bunny.net/edgescript-sdk&amp;#39;  BunnySDK.net.http.serve(async (request: Request) =&amp;gt; Thats a proprietary lock-in worse than what it tries to replace!&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt; and technical hurdles like unreliable cache purging and lack of free CNAME flattening &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47675268&quot; title=&quot;Unfortunately it doesn&amp;#39;t offer free hosting for hobbyists. Even for superficial traffic you&amp;#39;ll have pay 1 euro a month (plus VAT). Not many DNS management providers (that I&amp;#39;m aware of, please correct me) support CNAME flattening. That is having your A record point to a CNAME. Every time I purge the pull zone cache, I do it twice, cause once from my CI isn&amp;#39;t enough. My CI does individual page cache invalidation during deployment, but there needs to be some kind of delay (with no feedback) when…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rx7xzd10xo&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cambodia unveils statue to honour famous landmine-sniffing rat&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47678573&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;488 points · 130 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cambodia has unveiled a stone statue in Siem Reap to honor Magawa, a decorated African giant pouched rat that detected over 100 landmines during his five-year career. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rx7xzd10xo&quot; title=&quot;Title: Cambodia unveils a statue of famous landmine-sniffing rat Magawa    URL Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rx7xzd10xo    Published Time: 2026-04-05T01:09:11.883Z    Markdown Content:  # Cambodia unveils a statue of famous landmine-sniffing rat Magawa    [Skip to content](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rx7xzd10xo#bbc-main)    Advertisement    [Watch Live](https://www.bbc.com/watch-live-news/)    [](https://www.bbc.com/)    Subscribe    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion celebrates the life of Magawa, a landmine-sniffing rat whose retirement of &amp;#34;bananas and peanuts&amp;#34; is seen as an enviable end to a meaningful life &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47679194&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Magawa retired from bomb sniffing in June 2021 owing to his old age, as is standard for APOPO&amp;#39;s HeroRATs. &amp;gt; He spent a number of weeks mentoring 20 newly-recruited rats before ultimately retiring to a life of &amp;#39;snacking on bananas and peanuts&amp;#39;. &amp;gt; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magawa End to life worthy of being envied.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47679191&quot; title=&quot;Stark reminder of how precious and meaningful a life can be - of any creature,  no matter how small. We should be nice to all creatures not just humans.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users question the mechanics of rat-to-rat mentoring &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47679769&quot; title=&quot;How does one rat mentor another?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest that animal-based sensors remain more cost-effective and deployable than current human-engineered technology &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47679288&quot; title=&quot;I don’t like this site’s obsession with reducing everything to market opportunities, but… it’s extremely well documented that land mines, white truffles, cancer, diabetes, chemical weapons, etc can all be ‘sniffed’ by animals and it’s a mechanism that is almost always ‘better’ (cheaper, quicker, more deployable in the field) than human-engineered solutions. Surely there’s some vebture capital opportunity here for better sensors that would unarguably improve our lot more than AI, at least per…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The thread also features a debate on animal ethics, with some arguing that recognizing the value of such creatures logically supports veganism, though this often triggers defensive reactions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47680010&quot; title=&quot;I agree. However, you get insane push back the second you start to mention veganism. And yes, that is a luxury and there large parts of the world where that&amp;#39;s not an option, but if you&amp;#39;re reading this comment you probably could survive without eating meat.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47682587&quot; title=&quot;Hot take: people get angry about veganism because they suspect, deep down, that vegans are right and feel guilty about eating meat. (Not taking the moral high ground here - I have put approximately zero effort into reducing meat intake at all.)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47682690&quot; title=&quot;Vegas are objectively right. I eat mostly vegan but still eat other stuff from time to time. I look at those times as me being selfish. I am an imperfect person and the vegans are right.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Finally, there is concern that the demand for these &amp;#34;hero rats&amp;#34; will rise as several European nations withdraw from the Ottawa Treaty banning landmines due to regional security threats &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47680208&quot; title=&quot;Sadly demand for such heros may increase in the future. Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Ukraine and Finland withdrew from the Ottawa Treaty banning personnel mines. And probably more countries will follow.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47680682&quot; title=&quot;Is that their fault or is there maybe a giant reason nearby why they are doing this?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47681151&quot; title=&quot;Whatever the reason, this will increase the likelihood of landmine casualties in the future. And not necessarily (only) in this area, but it weakens the treaty in general. Part of these kinds of treaties is to accept some additional difficulty or expenses in defence for a more widespread benefit. I&amp;#39;m living in Finland and I would have accepted these.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKbgulTp3FE&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;DRAM has a design flaw from 1966. I bypassed it [video]&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (youtube.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47680005&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;396 points · 154 comments · by surprisetalk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer has created Tailslayer, a library designed to reduce tail latency in RAM reads by bypassing a fundamental DRAM design flaw dating back to 1966. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKbgulTp3FE&quot; title=&quot;Related: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Tailslayer: Library for reducing tail latency in RAM reads&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47680023&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47680023&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt; - April 2026 (23 comments)&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on &amp;#34;Tailslayer,&amp;#34; a library that reduces DRAM tail latency by replicating data across multiple memory channels and issuing &amp;#34;hedged reads&amp;#34; to bypass refresh stalls &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47713075&quot; title=&quot;This is very much worth watching. It is a tour de force. Laurie does an amazing job of reimagining Google&amp;#39;s strange job optimisation technique (for jobs running on hard disk storage) that uses 2 CPUs to do the same job. The technique simply takes the result of the machine that finishes it first, discarding the slower job&amp;#39;s results... It seems expensive in resources, but it works and allows high priority tasks to run optimally. Laurie re-imagines this process but for RAM!! In doing this she…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47714652&quot; title=&quot;This is a 54 minute video.  I watched about 3 minutes and it seemed like some potentially interesting info wrapped in useless visuals.  I thought about downloading and reading the transcript (that&amp;#39;s faster than watching videos), but it seems to me that it&amp;#39;s another video that would be much better as a blog post.  Could someone summarize in a sentence or two?  Yes we know about the refresh interval.  What is the bypass? Update: found the bypass via the youtube blurb:…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While users praised the technical depth of the reverse-engineering and the engaging presentation style &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47713075&quot; title=&quot;This is very much worth watching. It is a tour de force. Laurie does an amazing job of reimagining Google&amp;#39;s strange job optimisation technique (for jobs running on hard disk storage) that uses 2 CPUs to do the same job. The technique simply takes the result of the machine that finishes it first, discarding the slower job&amp;#39;s results... It seems expensive in resources, but it works and allows high priority tasks to run optimally. Laurie re-imagines this process but for RAM!! In doing this she…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47715167&quot; title=&quot;Unnecessarily negative imo. I like the video because I cant read a blog post in the background while doing other stuff, and I like Gadget Hackwrench narrating semi-obscure CS topics lol&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47714560&quot; title=&quot;She could probably have been stinking rich on this work alone, but instead she just put it up on Github. Kudos to Laurie.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, some critics argued the technique is impractical for real-world applications because doubling memory bandwidth and cache pressure to save ~250ns is rarely a favorable trade-off &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47713255&quot; title=&quot;Love the format, and super cool to see a benchmark that so clearly shows DRAM refresh stalls, especially avoiding them via reverse engineering the channel layout! Ran it on my 9950X3D machine with dual-channel DDR5 and saw clear spikes from 70ns to 330ns every 15us or so. The hedging technique is a cool demo too, but I’m not sure it’s practical. At a high level it’s a bit contradictory; trying to reduce the tail latency of cold reads by doubling the cache footprint makes every other read even…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Suggestions for improvement included a dedicated CPU instruction for racing reads to simplify the current complex threading model &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47715531&quot; title=&quot;It could be massively improved with a special CPU instruction for racing dram reads. That might make it actually useful for real applications. As it is, the threading model she used here would make it incredibly difficult to use this in a real program.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sheets.works/data-viz/every-gpu&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Every GPU That Mattered&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sheets.works)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47672295&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;330 points · 207 comments · by jonbaer&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This interactive data visualization tracks the 30-year evolution of 49 influential graphics cards, comparing technical milestones from early 3D accelerators to modern GPUs with up to 92 billion transistors. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sheets.works/data-viz/every-gpu&quot; title=&quot;Title: Every GPU That Mattered    URL Source: https://sheets.works/data-viz/every-gpu    Published Time: Wed, 08 Apr 2026 05:08:21 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Every GPU That Mattered | sheets.works    The Data Drop #043    # Every GPU    That _Mattered_    49 graphics cards. 30 years. From Quake to Cyberpunk.    49    GPUs    30    Years    92B    Transistors (peak)    Launch price 2025 dollars    Scroll    ## The Timeline    Drag, click an era, or use the arrows. 49 cards across 30 years.    Pioneering Era 1996-1999 The birth of…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the list evokes strong nostalgia for &amp;#34;dream machines&amp;#34; like the 8800 GT and 1080 Ti &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47672435&quot; title=&quot;Absolute nostalgia fever. About a month ago, I dug up an old desktop in the corner, took the drives out and gave away the machine. It felt like putting a racehorse to pasture: i7-4790k, 1080 Ti. It was my dream machine when I got it. Dual-boot (as we did back in the old days when Proton wasn&amp;#39;t here) to Ubuntu, then Elementary, then Arch. By the time I gave it away it wasn&amp;#39;t worth the power cost. And that brought to mind my older dream machine, an 8800 GT from generations past, before which we…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, many users criticized it for being a low-effort, potentially LLM-generated marketing piece that overlooks the diversity of the &amp;#34;Pioneering Era&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47678548&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t believe this list was curated as the title suggests. It&amp;#39;s just a semi-random list of popular-ish GPUs with LLM-generated descriptions. The site looks nice, which fools us into thinking thought and effort was put into this.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47676214&quot; title=&quot;The article blew a huge opportunity to showcase the great diversity of “Pioneering Era” 3D accelerators (they weren’t called GPUs until later). But instead they just pretended it was always NVIDIA vs ATI, and threw in a few Voodoos.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47674841&quot; title=&quot;This is an ad from viral marketing company and everyone here is falling for it.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters suggested several notable omissions, including the S3 Savage3D for pioneering texture compression &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673765&quot; title=&quot;Or the S3 Savage3D, which, while being inferior to the TNT2, pioneered texture compression. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S3_Texture_Compression&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, the Rendition Vérité 1000 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47672742&quot; title=&quot;Honorable mention, the Rendition Vérité 1000 https://fabiensanglard.net/vquake/index.html Released before the Voodoo 1 with glquake and gl support for Tomb Raider.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, and the GeForce4 MX440 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673337&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t see my first GPU on there, it was the humble GeForce4 MX440. It could run almost any game I cared about for a surprisingly long time, even if it&amp;#39;s not a true modern card.  These days almost all my machines are on iGPUs baked into the CPU. There&amp;#39;s way less fun for me, but they are a lot more compact at least.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a technical debate regarding the Matrox G200; while some felt it lacked long-term impact &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47672945&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s probably just me being out of touch, but I don&amp;#39;t think the GeForce RTX 4000 or 5000 series really mattered/matters that much. At the same time I&amp;#39;d add the S3 ViRGE and the Matrox G200. Both mattered a lot at the time, but not long term.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others noted its enduring legacy as a standard implementation for server BMCs and network KVMs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673044&quot; title=&quot;The G200 mattered to some degree for a long time, because most x86 servers up until a few years ago would ship a G200 implementation or at least something pretending to be a G200 card as part of their BMC for network KVM.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673234&quot; title=&quot;Like virtualized NICs pretending to be an NE2000? That&amp;#39;s interesting, do you know why they&amp;#39;d use a G200 and not something like an older ATI chip?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/44257&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Claude Code login fails with OAuth timeout on Windows&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47676521&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;218 points · &lt;strong&gt;294 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by sh1mmer&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Claude Code users across Windows, Mac, and Linux reported being blocked by OAuth login timeouts and 500 errors, an issue Anthropic attributed to a broader service outage that has since been largely resolved. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/44257&quot; title=&quot;Title: [BUG] Claude Code login fails with OAuth timeout on Windows    URL Source: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/44257    Published Time: 2026-04-06T15:40:07.000Z    Markdown Content:  # [BUG] Claude Code login fails with OAuth timeout on Windows · Issue #44257 · anthropics/claude-code    [Skip to content](https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/44257#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [](https://github.com/)    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of Claude Code has sparked a debate between &amp;#34;vibe coders&amp;#34; who claim 10x productivity gains in complex engineering and skeptics who find the tool unreliable for large, existing codebases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677441&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I get it. LLMs are cool technology. I don&amp;#39;t think many of you have legitimately tried Claude Code, or maybe you&amp;#39;re holding it wrong. I&amp;#39;m getting 10x the work done. I&amp;#39;m operating at all layers of the stack with a speed and rapidity I&amp;#39;ve never had before. And before anyone accuses me of being some &amp;#39;vibe coder&amp;#39;, I&amp;#39;ve built five nines active-active money rails that move billions of dollars a day at 50kqps+, amongst lots of other hard hitting platform engineering work. Serious senior engineering…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677693&quot; title=&quot;I mean at this point can we just conclude that there are a group of engineers who claim to have incredible success with it and a group that claim it is unreliable and cannot be trusted to do complex tasks. I struggle to believe that a ton of seemingly intelligent software engineers are too dumb to figure out how to use Claude code to get reliable results, it seems much more likely to me that it can do well at isolated tasks or new projects but fails when pointed at large complex code bases…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. This surge in adoption has led to significant &amp;#34;growing pains,&amp;#34; with users reporting frequent outages and capacity issues as Anthropic struggles to scale compute for its rapidly expanding user base &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47676648&quot; title=&quot;Mounting evidence that claude max users are put into one big compute fuel pool. Demand increased dramatically with OpenAI&amp;#39;s DoD PR snafu (even though Anth was already working with the DoD? But I digress...). The pool hit a ceiling. Anth has no compute left to give. Hence people maxing out after 1 query. &amp;#39;Working on it&amp;#39; means finding a way to distill Claude Code that isn&amp;#39;t enough of a quality degradation to be noticed[0], in order to get the compute pool operational again. The distillation will…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47676590&quot; title=&quot;The trend on the status page[1] does not inspire confidence. Beginning to wonder if this might be a daily thing. [1] https://status.claude.com/&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47676602&quot; title=&quot;They went from $9b ARR at the end of 2025 to $30b ARR today. That&amp;#39;s more than 3x the size in 3 months. I expect growing pains. For some context, they added 2x Palantir or .75x Shopify or .68x Adobe annual revenue in March alone.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that the shift toward subscription-based development tools is a risky departure from traditional reliability, others suggest that the performance gains make the transition as inevitable as moving from dial-up to broadband &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677132&quot; title=&quot;As much as people on Hacker News complain about subscription models for productivity and creativity suites, the open arms embrace of subscription development tools (services, really) which seek to offload the very act itself makes me wonder how and why so many people are eager to dive right in.  I get it.  LLMs are cool technology. Is this a symptom of the same phenomenon behind the deluge of disposable JavaScript frameworks of just ten years ago?  Is it peer pressure, fear of missing out?  At…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677441&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I get it. LLMs are cool technology. I don&amp;#39;t think many of you have legitimately tried Claude Code, or maybe you&amp;#39;re holding it wrong. I&amp;#39;m getting 10x the work done. I&amp;#39;m operating at all layers of the stack with a speed and rapidity I&amp;#39;ve never had before. And before anyone accuses me of being some &amp;#39;vibe coder&amp;#39;, I&amp;#39;ve built five nines active-active money rails that move billions of dollars a day at 50kqps+, amongst lots of other hard hitting platform engineering work. Serious senior engineering…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.cloudflare.com/post-quantum-roadmap/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cloudflare targets 2029 for full post-quantum security&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.cloudflare.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47675625&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;385 points · 112 comments · by ilreb&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudflare has accelerated its post-quantum security roadmap to target full protection by 2029, citing recent breakthroughs in quantum algorithms and hardware that could break current encryption standards much sooner than previously expected. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.cloudflare.com/post-quantum-roadmap/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Cloudflare targets 2029 for full post-quantum security    URL Source: https://blog.cloudflare.com/post-quantum-roadmap/    Published Time: 2026-04-07T22:00+01:00    Markdown Content:  2026-04-07    8 min read    ![Image 1](https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6siStuS5VWsIdEag8FQZkF/2e014e951328beb480468dffda783c2d/image1.png)    Cloudflare is accelerating its post-quantum roadmap. We now target **2029** to be fully post-quantum (PQ) secure including, crucially, post-quantum…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights that while quantum computers capable of breaking current encryption remain theoretical &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677147&quot; title=&quot;Is this still theory or are there working Quantum systems that have broken anything yet?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677283&quot; title=&quot;Theory. And afaik there are still questions as to if the PQ algorithms are actually secure.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, Cloudflare is prioritizing a transition to post-quantum cryptography (PQC) to mitigate future risks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677520&quot; title=&quot;It will be interesting to compare PQ rollout to HTTPS rollout historically (either the &amp;#39;SSL becomes widespread in 2015&amp;#39; thing, or the deprecation SSL 3.0).  Cloudflare is in an easy position to do stuff like this because it can decouple end user/browser upgrade cycles from backend upgrade cycles. Some browsers and some end user devices get upgraded quickly, so making it easy to make it optionally-PQ on any site, and then as that rollout extends, some specialty sites can make it mandatory, and…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant debate regarding the maturity of PQC algorithms; some users express concern over recent high-profile failures of certain candidates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677938&quot; title=&quot;Fair, but recently several PQ algorithms have been shown to in fact not be secure, with known attacks, so I wouldn’t equate them&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47678372&quot; title=&quot;Didn&amp;#39;t one of the PQC candidates get found to have a fatal classical vulnerability? Are we confident we won&amp;#39;t find any future oopsies like that with the current PQC candidates?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, while others argue that these failures are a natural part of the vetting process and do not invalidate the diverse underlying technologies of the remaining standards &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47678306&quot; title=&quot;There are not in fact meaningful questions about whether the settled-on PQC constructions are secure, in the sense of &amp;#39;within the bounds of our current understanding of QC&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47678546&quot; title=&quot;The whole point of the competition is to see if anybody can cryptanalyze the contestants. I think part of what&amp;#39;s happening here is that people have put all PQC constructions in bucket, as if they shared an underlying technology or theory, so that a break in one calls all of them into question. That is in fact not at all the case. PQC is not a &amp;#39;kind&amp;#39; of cryptography. It&amp;#39;s a functional attribute of many different kinds of cryptography. The algorithm everyone tends to be thinking of when they…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The rollout is expected to be complex, potentially mirroring the historical transition to HTTPS, with particular challenges anticipated for hardware and decentralized systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677520&quot; title=&quot;It will be interesting to compare PQ rollout to HTTPS rollout historically (either the &amp;#39;SSL becomes widespread in 2015&amp;#39; thing, or the deprecation SSL 3.0).  Cloudflare is in an easy position to do stuff like this because it can decouple end user/browser upgrade cycles from backend upgrade cycles. Some browsers and some end user devices get upgraded quickly, so making it easy to make it optionally-PQ on any site, and then as that rollout extends, some specialty sites can make it mandatory, and…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.allthingsdistributed.com/2026/04/s3-files-and-the-changing-face-of-s3.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;S3 Files&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (allthingsdistributed.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47680404&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;378 points · 118 comments · by werner&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AWS has launched S3 Files, a new feature that allows users to access S3 buckets as native file systems, simplifying data management by bridging the gap between object storage and traditional file-based workflows. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.allthingsdistributed.com/2026/04/s3-files-and-the-changing-face-of-s3.html&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;aws.amazon.com&amp;amp;#x2F;blogs&amp;amp;#x2F;aws&amp;amp;#x2F;launching-s3-files-making-s3-buckets-accessible-as-file-systems&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;aws.amazon.com&amp;amp;#x2F;blogs&amp;amp;#x2F;aws&amp;amp;#x2F;launching-s3-files-making-s...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AWS S3 Files acts as a bridge using EFS as a caching layer, though users note that EFS&amp;#39;s high pricing for writes and storage may be a dealbreaker for write-heavy applications &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47681440&quot; title=&quot;This is essentially S3FS using EFS (AWS&amp;#39;s managed NFS service) as a cache layer for active data and small random accesses. Unfortunately, this also means that it comes with some of EFS&amp;#39;s eye-watering pricing: — All writes cost $0.06/GB, since everything is first written to the EFS cache. For write-heavy applications, this could be a dealbreaker. — Reads hitting the cache get billed at $0.03/GB. Large reads (&amp;gt;128kB) get directly streamed from the underlying S3 bucket, which is free. — Cache is…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47681649&quot; title=&quot;tldr: this caches your S3 data in EFS. we run datalakes using DuckLake and this sounds really useful. GCP should follow suit quickly.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some question why AWS is now embracing S3 as a filesystem after years of discouraging it, others point out that existing tools like `s3fs` have filled this niche for decades &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47680931&quot; title=&quot;I cannot 100% confirm this, but I believe AWS insisted a lot in NOT using S3 as a file system. Why the change now?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47680740&quot; title=&quot;Zero mention of s3fs which already did this for decades.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant debate exists regarding the 128kB default cache threshold, with critics arguing that S3&amp;#39;s high latency compared to NVMe makes caching necessary for much larger files &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47682267&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Large reads (&amp;gt;128kB) get directly streamed from the underlying S3 bucket, which is free. Always uncached? S3 has pretty bad latency.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47682638&quot; title=&quot;The threshold at which the cache gets used is configurable, with 128kB the default. The assumption is that any read larger than the threshold will be a long sustained read, for which latency doesn&amp;#39;t matter too much. My question is, do reads &amp;lt;128kB (or whatever the threshold is) from files &amp;gt;128kB get saved to the cache, or is it only used for files whose overall size is under the threshold? Frequent random access to large files is a textbook use case for a caching layer like this, but its cost…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47682865&quot; title=&quot;NVMe read latency is in the 10-100µs range for 128kB blocks. S3 is about 100ms. That&amp;#39;s 3-4 OOMs.  The threshold where the total read duration starts to dominate latency would be somewhere in the dozens to hundreds of megabytes, not kilobytes.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, the underlying immutability of S3 remains a hurdle, as even minor edits or renames require re-uploading entire files &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47683663&quot; title=&quot;The problem with using S3 as a filesystem is that it’s immutable, and that hasn’t changed with S3 Files. So if I have a large file and change 1 byte of it, or even just rename it, it needs to upload the entire file all over again. This seems most useful for read-heavy workflows of files that are small enough to fit in the cache.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rajnandan.com/posts/taste-in-the-age-of-ai-and-llms/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Taste in the age of AI and LLMs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (rajnandan.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677241&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;265 points · 212 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As AI makes competent output cheap and abundant, human taste and judgment have become the primary competitive advantages for distinguishing specific, high-quality work from generic, machine-generated averages. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rajnandan.com/posts/taste-in-the-age-of-ai-and-llms/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Good Taste the Only Real Moat Left    URL Source: https://rajnandan.com/posts/taste-in-the-age-of-ai-and-llms/    Published Time: Fri, 03 Apr 2026 09:19:23 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Good Taste the Only Real Moat Left    *   [What taste actually means](https://rajnandan.com/posts/taste-in-the-age-of-ai-and-llms/#what-taste-actually-means)  *   [Why AI and LLMs flatten the middle](https://rajnandan.com/posts/taste-in-the-age-of-ai-and-llms/#why-ai-and-llms-flatten-the-middle)  *   [The new…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether &amp;#34;taste&amp;#34;—defined as clear product vision and precise judgment—is the primary differentiator in an era of AI-generated output &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677833&quot; title=&quot;Disagree with the overall argument. Human effort is still a moat. I&amp;#39;ve been spending the past couple of months creating a codebase that is almost entirely AI-generated. I&amp;#39;ve gotten way further than I would have otherwise at this pace, but it was still a lot of effort, and I still wasted time going down rabbit holes on features that didn&amp;#39;t work out. There&amp;#39;s some truth in there that judgement is as important as ever, though I&amp;#39;m not sure I&amp;#39;d call it taste. I&amp;#39;m finding that you have to have an…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677600&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; One of the most useful things about AI is also one of the most humbling: it reveals how clear your own judgment actually is. If your critique stays vague, your taste is still underdeveloped. If your critique becomes precise, your judgment is stronger than the model output. You can then use the model well instead of being led by it. Something I find that teams get wrong with agentic coding: they start by reverse engineering docs from an existing codebase. This is a mistake. Instead, the right…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677930&quot; title=&quot;I feel like you&amp;#39;re pretty strongly agreeing that taste is important: &amp;#39; I&amp;#39;m finding that you have to have an extremely clear product vision...&amp;#39;&amp;#39; Clear production vision that you&amp;#39;re building the right thing in the right way -- this involves a lot of taste to get right.  Good PMs have this. Good enginers have this.  Visionary leaders have this.... The execution of using AI to generate the code and other artifacts, is a matter of skill.  But without the taste that you&amp;#39;re building the right thing,…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that human effort remains a necessary &amp;#34;moat&amp;#34; to prevent codebases from becoming incoherent messes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677833&quot; title=&quot;Disagree with the overall argument. Human effort is still a moat. I&amp;#39;ve been spending the past couple of months creating a codebase that is almost entirely AI-generated. I&amp;#39;ve gotten way further than I would have otherwise at this pace, but it was still a lot of effort, and I still wasted time going down rabbit holes on features that didn&amp;#39;t work out. There&amp;#39;s some truth in there that judgement is as important as ever, though I&amp;#39;m not sure I&amp;#39;d call it taste. I&amp;#39;m finding that you have to have an…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47678129&quot; title=&quot;The way I understood it, the original article is saying the _only_ remaining differentiator is taste and the comment you replied to is saying &amp;#39;wrong, there are also other things, such as effort&amp;#39;. I don&amp;#39;t necessarily interpret the comment you replied to as saying that &amp;#39;taste is not important&amp;#39;, which seems like what you are replying to, just that it&amp;#39;s not the only remaining thing. I agree that taste gets you far. And I agree with all the examples of good taste that you brought up. But even with…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that AI is rapidly automating effort, leaving only the ability to dictate &amp;#34;perfect&amp;#34; architecture as the remaining skill &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677600&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; One of the most useful things about AI is also one of the most humbling: it reveals how clear your own judgment actually is. If your critique stays vague, your taste is still underdeveloped. If your critique becomes precise, your judgment is stronger than the model output. You can then use the model well instead of being led by it. Something I find that teams get wrong with agentic coding: they start by reverse engineering docs from an existing codebase. This is a mistake. Instead, the right…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47679230&quot; title=&quot;Aren’t you just making their point stronger?  Effort is what is being replaced here, with some taste and a pile of AI (formerly effort) you can go to the moon.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677990&quot; title=&quot;I think you&amp;#39;re missing the point. Effort is a moat now because centaurs (human+AI) still beat AIs, but that gap gets smaller every year (and will ostensibly be closed). The goal is to replicate human labor, and they&amp;#39;re closing that gap. Once they do (maybe decades, but probably will happen), then only that &amp;#39;special something&amp;#39; will remain. Taste, vision... We shall all become Rick Rubins. Until 2045, when they ship RubinGPT&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A notable point of irony was raised regarding the article itself being AI-generated, which some felt underscored the very mediocrity the text warned against &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677958&quot; title=&quot;It is profoundly ironic that this article is AI generated.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677930&quot; title=&quot;I feel like you&amp;#39;re pretty strongly agreeing that taste is important: &amp;#39; I&amp;#39;m finding that you have to have an extremely clear product vision...&amp;#39;&amp;#39; Clear production vision that you&amp;#39;re building the right thing in the right way -- this involves a lot of taste to get right.  Good PMs have this. Good enginers have this.  Visionary leaders have this.... The execution of using AI to generate the code and other artifacts, is a matter of skill.  But without the taste that you&amp;#39;re building the right thing,…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://locker.dev&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (locker.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673394&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;251 points · 207 comments · by Zm44&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Locker is a new open-source alternative to cloud storage services like Dropbox that allows users to manage their own files using a virtual file system compatible with S3, R2, and local storage. &lt;a href=&quot;https://locker.dev&quot; title=&quot;Last week SWYX nerd-sniped me into building an Open-source Dropbox.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Here is Locker: the ultimate open-source Google Drive&amp;amp;#x2F;box&amp;amp;#x2F;Dropbox alternative   - Provider agnostic (S3, R2, vercel blob, local)  - BYOB (Bring your own bucket)  - Virtual file system  - QMD Search plugin&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights that the primary value of services like Dropbox lies in deep OS integration and seamless syncing rather than just storage, which a simple S3 wrapper lacks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673955&quot; title=&quot;The selling point of Dropbox/Google Drive isn&amp;#39;t the storage itself, but that there&amp;#39;s app for mobile and desktop operating systems which deeply integrates it in the OS so it&amp;#39;s just like a local folder that&amp;#39;s magically synced. So it&amp;#39;s a cool project, but not really what I&amp;#39;d say is a Dropbox replacement.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47676419&quot; title=&quot;In fairness, you can also have that experience with Microsoft OneDrive.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics express significant skepticism regarding the reliability of a new, &amp;#34;vibe coded&amp;#34; app for sensitive data, noting the extreme difficulty of handling edge cases and race conditions to prevent data loss &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47675655&quot; title=&quot;Why wouldn&amp;#39;t I trust a vibe coded app that has existed for 1 week with all my important data?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47676380&quot; title=&quot;How can I practically verify 2TB of a life&amp;#39;s worth of files while guaranteeing I won&amp;#39;t have data loss due to some edge cases and race conditions that delete my data. Every time I&amp;#39;ve created my own backup script I realized knowing what to delete and when is not easy. IMO the practical solution to this is to just pay for more storage (within reason).&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users prefer self-hosting via tools like Syncthing or Garage for cost savings and control, others argue that the maintenance effort and risk of data deletion make paying for established providers more practical &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47675231&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; but that there&amp;#39;s app for mobile and desktop operating systems which deeply integrates it in the OS so it&amp;#39;s just like a local folder that&amp;#39;s magically synced Which mobile OS would that be? The big reason I stopped being excited about cloud storage is that on mobile, from what I can tell, none of the major providers care about &amp;#39;folder that syncs&amp;#39; experience. You only get an app that lets you view remote storage. The only proper &amp;#39;folder that syncs&amp;#39; I had working on my phone so far was provided…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47674177&quot; title=&quot;I bought 35$/mo 16TB server from OVH. I am running 2 replicas of Garage, one on this server. I am using this for backup for now but probably I will also move my Nextcloud files there and websites. This is fine for now and less pricey than any S3 provider I was able to find.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47676380&quot; title=&quot;How can I practically verify 2TB of a life&amp;#39;s worth of files while guaranteeing I won&amp;#39;t have data loss due to some edge cases and race conditions that delete my data. Every time I&amp;#39;ve created my own backup script I realized knowing what to delete and when is not easy. IMO the practical solution to this is to just pay for more storage (within reason).&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. This debate famously echoes the original 2007 Hacker News skepticism toward Dropbox&amp;#39;s initial launch &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47674176&quot; title=&quot;We&amp;#39;ve officially come full circle https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9224&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dornsife.usc.edu/news/stories/ai-may-be-making-us-think-and-write-more-alike/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI may be making us think and write more alike&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (dornsife.usc.edu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673541&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;217 points · &lt;strong&gt;230 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by giuliomagnifico&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;USC researchers warn that the widespread use of large language models is homogenizing human expression and reasoning, potentially reducing cognitive diversity and collective problem-solving by standardizing linguistic styles and favoring narrow, Western-centric perspectives. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dornsife.usc.edu/news/stories/ai-may-be-making-us-think-and-write-more-alike/&quot; title=&quot;Title: AI may be making us think and write more alike    URL Source: https://dornsife.usc.edu/news/stories/ai-may-be-making-us-think-and-write-more-alike/    Published Time: 2026-03-11T23:15:51+00:00    Markdown Content:  # AI may be making us think and write more alike    [Skip to Content](https://dornsife.usc.edu/news/stories/ai-may-be-making-us-think-and-write-more-alike/#main-content)    [](https://dornsife.usc.edu/)    Open Site Navigation / Menu    Search    ## What are you looking for?     What you&amp;#39;re…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters express concern that LLMs are creating a &amp;#34;Dark Forest&amp;#34; internet where humans self-censor or retreat into private groups to avoid having their creative output &amp;#34;siphoned&amp;#34; for training data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673893&quot; title=&quot;This state of affairs presages the advent of a second dark age - one that will forever eclipse the era of radical openness &amp;amp; transparency that once served the software community for decades. Tips, tricks, life hacks and other expert techniques will once again be jealously guarded from the prying eyes of the LLM whok would steal their competitive advantage &amp;amp; replicate it at scale, until any possible information asymmetries have been arbitraged away. The development &amp;amp; secrecy of technique will…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47675305&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Tips, tricks, life hacks and other expert techniques will once again be jealously guarded from the prying eyes of the LLM who would steal their competitive advantage &amp;amp; replicate it at scale I&amp;#39;ve already started thinking this way, there&amp;#39;s stuff I would have open sourced in the past but no longer will because I know it would get trained on. I&amp;#39;m not sure of any way I can share it with humans and only humans. If I let the LLMs have the UI patterns and libraries I&amp;#39;ve developed it would dilute my…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. This shift is driven by a perceived decline in quality, as users report being inundated with &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;average&amp;#34; guidance that discourages deep skill development &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47675478&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not seeing how the benefits have outweighed the positives at this point. Spam, scams, porn, being inundated with slop, people losing their skills and getting dumber, mass surveillance... Is that worth possibly maybe saving some time programming, but then not gaining the knowledge you would have if you did it yourself, that can be built on in the future? I don&amp;#39;t see technological advancement as good in itself if morality is in decline.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47676260&quot; title=&quot;LLMs have felt to me like they excel in one particular skill (being able to make connections across vast amounts of knowledge) and are basically average, otherwise. If I&amp;#39;m below average at something (painting, say) the results astound me. But if I&amp;#39;m above average (programming, writing (I like to think)), I&amp;#39;m generally underwhelmed by the results. I used Claude a lot for planning my current fun project. Good rubber duck. It liked all the suggestions I pitched for the design, but I only went with…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this is a temporary &amp;#34;fashion effect&amp;#34; and that human norms will eventually reassert themselves &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47674556&quot; title=&quot;Human communication and reasoning is the end result of billions of years of evolution. I&amp;#39;d be very surprised if LLMs can fundamentally alter it in a few years. When considering phenomenon like these, I think people seriously underestimate what I&amp;#39;d call the &amp;#39;fashion effect&amp;#39;. When a new technology, medium or aesthetic appears, it can have a surprisingly rapid influence on behaviour and discourse. The human social brain seems especially susceptible to novelty in this way. Because the effects…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend the damage is already visible through &amp;#34;Orwellian&amp;#34; AI moderation that forces users to unconsciously edit their language to avoid bot detection &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47674721&quot; title=&quot;Take a community with AI moderation like Reddit, I&amp;#39;ve been a participant for years. With the recent push to AI autocorrect and moderation, you can see the changes in language. New words, new ways of speaking, unconsciously editing yourself because you don&amp;#39;t want to draw the eye of the bot. It doesn&amp;#39;t feel subtle. It feels Orwellian.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.sciencealert.com/how-12-000-tonnes-of-dumped-orange-peel-produced-something-nobody-imagined&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;12k Tons of Dumped Orange Peel Grew into a Landscape Nobody Expected (2017)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sciencealert.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677142&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;315 points · 123 comments · by pulisse&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An abandoned conservation project in Costa Rica successfully transformed a barren pasture into a lush, biodiverse forest by dumping 12,000 tonnes of waste orange peel on the site in the 1990s. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.sciencealert.com/how-12-000-tonnes-of-dumped-orange-peel-produced-something-nobody-imagined&quot; title=&quot;How 12,000 Tonnes of Dumped Orange Peel Grew Into a Landscape Nobody Expected to Find    An experimental conservation project that was abandoned and almost forgotten about, has ended up producing an amazing ecological win nearly two decades after it was dreamt up.    [xml version=&amp;#39;1.0&amp;#39; encoding=&amp;#39;UTF-8&amp;#39;?](https://www.sciencealert.com/)    * [Space](https://www.sciencealert.com/space)  * [Health](https://www.sciencealert.com/health)  * [Environment](https://www.sciencealert.com/environment)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The restoration of degraded land using orange peels highlights the immense potential of organic waste as a &amp;#34;powerful agent of change&amp;#34; for habitat restoration and carbon sequestration &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47678060&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s recently occurred to me how &amp;#39;valuable&amp;#39; today&amp;#39;s trash is likely to be considered in the future. I&amp;#39;ll focus on organics here but I think the plastics will be equally valuable, too. I have no idea what % of American households compost or live in places which offer municipal compost pickup but I imagine it&amp;#39;s in the single digits. As evidenced by this article, compost is/can be an incredibly powerful agent of change: food production, habitat restoration, etc. However, most of us are putting…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47678882&quot; title=&quot;Turning degraded land back into fertile land is actually very feasible and not as hopeless as it may seem. A lot of the damage people have done to landscapes in recent centuries is still reversible. There are a lot of examples all over the world of people turning dried out and heavily eroded land back into fertile land with great bio diversity. Sometimes at small scale, and sometimes at very large scale. Often even just leaving it alone, and putting a stop to the practices that destroyed the…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users questioned the immediate methane emissions of such large-scale composting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47678236&quot; title=&quot;Does orange peel not produce any CO2 / methane when left like this? I&amp;#39;m assuming there is some negative carbon footprint before this becomes a positive? The ecological win definitely looks nice on paper, but whenever people talk about compost the carbon footprint / gas emissions is always at the front of people&amp;#39;s minds, and I don&amp;#39;t really see that discussed in the article. The article does say &amp;gt; Especially since, in addition to the double-win of dealing with waste and revitalising barren…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others noted that today&amp;#39;s landfills may eventually become valuable &amp;#34;mines&amp;#34; for resource recovery &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47678413&quot; title=&quot;The thought occurred to me some 25+ years ago that today&amp;#39;s landfills will be tomorrow&amp;#39;s mines. I hope it isn&amp;#39;t true but taking the very long view I&amp;#39;m afraid it will be.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47678508&quot; title=&quot;We already mine landfills -- mostly for land reclamation but sometimes to recover resources. In the longer run, when there&amp;#39;s been more compaction, settling, and densification (and changes in what things are valuable), and more need to reclaim land that was previously landfilled, we will do this more.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the project&amp;#39;s ecological success, it was shut down following a lawsuit from a rival company that alleged the experiment was a &amp;#34;permit for improper disposal&amp;#34; and involved political corruption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677564&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Despite this promising start, the conservation experiment wasn&amp;#39;t to last, after a rival juice manufacturer called TicoFruit sued Del Oro, alleging that its competitor had &amp;#39;defiled a national park&amp;#39;. ... why does TicoFruit even care? Did they just see their competitor do something that might be good for people and sue them out of spite?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47679112&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Despite this promising start, the conservation experiment wasn&amp;#39;t to last, after a rival juice manufacturer called TicoFruit sued Del Oro, alleging that its competitor had &amp;#39;defiled a national park&amp;#39;. No good deed goes unpunished--wild that the competitor company successfully sued them.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677794&quot; title=&quot;They saw it as corruption, basically. Here&amp;#39;s a contemporaneous article: https://apps.sas.upenn.edu/caterpillar/index.php?action=retr... &amp;gt;  TicoFrut, which is 98% Costa Rican-owned, charges that the environmental services contract is little more than a permit for improper disposal of its foreign-owned competitor&amp;#39;s waste. TicoFrut President Carlos Odio says Del Oro should be compelled to build a proper waste-disposal plant just as his company was forced to do in the mid-1990s amid allegations…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/trump-says-a-whole-civilization-will-die-tonight-if-iran-does-not-make-deal-2026-04-07/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Trump says &amp;#39;a whole civilization will die tonight&amp;#39; if Iran does not make a deal&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (reuters.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47674286&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;257 points · 163 comments · by jacquesm&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/trump-says-a-whole-civilization-will-die-tonight-if-iran-does-not-make-deal-2026-04-07/&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on whether the threat implies a nuclear strike or the systematic destruction of Iran&amp;#39;s civilian infrastructure, such as power plants and bridges &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47674764&quot; title=&quot;Two ways to interpret this: 1) US and Israel will throw everything they have (of conventional weapons) at Iran. 2) US will use (tactical) nuclear weapons on strategic targets. Of the two evils, I truly hope it will be (1).&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47674811&quot; title=&quot;A previous post was &amp;#39;Tuesday will be Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day&amp;#39;, so I&amp;#39;d guess it&amp;#39;s about that. Destroying the entire power infrastructure of a large country like that would have a pretty catastrophic effect on civilians. So that seems worse enough, I seriously hope no nukes will be involved.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47675233&quot; title=&quot;Do you mean tactical weapons on strategic targets? Or strategical weapons? I honestly don&amp;#39;t know what to believe, but I feel the doomsday clock is getting closer to midnight than in a long, long time&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view these statements as an open threat of genocide or state-sponsored terrorism &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677376&quot; title=&quot;Hence the term &amp;#39;Delphic&amp;#39;, commonly used in English to mean &amp;#39;dangerously ambiguous&amp;#39;. But in this case, there&amp;#39;s not really much ambiguity - Trump is openly threatening genocide and, as a result, is destroying any remaining moral authority that the USA might once have had.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47674468&quot; title=&quot;At this rate, if the official religion of USA was a different one, they would be categorized as a terrorist state&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47675781&quot; title=&quot;It is, just not in the USA. This is the textbook definition of terrorism: &amp;#39;The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.&amp;#39; It does not get much clearer than that.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that targeting infrastructure, though catastrophic and a potential war crime, does not meet the definition of genocide &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47675286&quot; title=&quot;You remember that video that some Democratic legislators did about refusing to obey illegal orders?  This is where that becomes absolutely real. (Targeting civilian infrastructure is a war crime.  Orders to commit war crimes are illegal by definition.)&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677601&quot; title=&quot;Is he? One could also read it as destroying their infrastructure. Which would be devastating to the population, but a far cry from genocide. I don’t think making unbased claims adds to the discussion; the facts are already severe enough to warrant their own critique.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also draws parallels to the &amp;#34;Delphic&amp;#34; ambiguity of historical omens, suggesting such rhetoric risks destroying the speaker&amp;#39;s own empire or moral authority &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47674694&quot; title=&quot;Kinda reminds me of the story of king Croesus of Lydia, who asked the oracle of Delphi whether he should wage war against Cyrus the Great, the Oracle promptly told him that by doing so he would &amp;#39;destroy a great empire&amp;#39;. Croesus then promptly attacked the Persians and lost. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Croesus#War_against_Persia_and...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47677376&quot; title=&quot;Hence the term &amp;#39;Delphic&amp;#39;, commonly used in English to mean &amp;#39;dangerously ambiguous&amp;#39;. But in this case, there&amp;#39;s not really much ambiguity - Trump is openly threatening genocide and, as a result, is destroying any remaining moral authority that the USA might once have had.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-04-06</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-04-06</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/13/sam-altman-may-control-our-future-can-he-be-trusted&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sam Altman may control our future – can he be trusted?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (newyorker.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47659135&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2192 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 914 comments · by adrianhon&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Internal memos and accounts from former OpenAI board members and executives allege that CEO Sam Altman exhibits a consistent pattern of deception and manipulation, prioritizing rapid commercial growth over the organization’s original safety-focused nonprofit mission and raising profound questions about his trustworthiness as a leader of transformative technology. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/13/sam-altman-may-control-our-future-can-he-be-trusted&quot; title=&quot;Title: Sam Altman May Control Our Future—Can He Be Trusted?    URL Source: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/13/sam-altman-may-control-our-future-can-he-be-trusted    Published Time: 2026-04-06T06:00:00.000-04:00    Markdown Content:  In the fall of 2023, Ilya Sutskever, OpenAI’s chief scientist, sent secret memos to three fellow-members of the organization’s board of directors. For weeks, they’d been having furtive discussions about whether Sam Altman, OpenAI’s C.E.O., and Greg Brockman, his…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on an investigation into Sam Altman’s leadership, with some users criticizing the &amp;#34;uninspired&amp;#34; pursuit of wealth and power documented in internal diaries &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47668557&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Amodei, in one of his early notes, recalled pressing Brockman on his priorities and Brockman replying that he wanted “money and power.” Brockman disputes this. His diary entries from this time suggest conflicting instincts. One reads, “Happy to not become rich on this, so long as no one else is.” In another, he asks, “So what do I really want?” Among his answers is “Financially what will take me to $1B.” I can&amp;#39;t imagine having such uninspired thoughts and actually writing them down while in a…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some praise the depth of the reporting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47660624&quot; title=&quot;Thank you for coming on HN and offering to answer questions.[a] This is a fantastic piece, very timely, evidently well-researched, and also well-written. Judging by the little that I know, it&amp;#39;s accurate. Thank you for doing the work and sharing it with the world. OpenAI may be in a more tenuous competitive position than many people realize. Recent anecdotal evidence suggests the company has lost its lead in the AI race to Anthropic.[b] Many people here, on HN, who develop software prefer…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47668568&quot; title=&quot;Wow, this is an incredibly detailed piece. Really in depth reporting and the kind of detailed investigation we need more of on important topics like this. &amp;gt; &amp;#39;Employees now call this moment “the Blip,” after an incident in the Marvel films in which characters disappear from existence and then return, unchanged, to a world profoundly altered by their absence.&amp;#39; This is a very small detail, but an instinctive grimace crosses my face at the thought of these sort of Marvel references and I&amp;#39;m not…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that focusing on Altman is &amp;#34;intellectually lazy&amp;#34; given that competitors like Anthropic may be overtaking OpenAI in both growth and product quality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47660624&quot; title=&quot;Thank you for coming on HN and offering to answer questions.[a] This is a fantastic piece, very timely, evidently well-researched, and also well-written. Judging by the little that I know, it&amp;#39;s accurate. Thank you for doing the work and sharing it with the world. OpenAI may be in a more tenuous competitive position than many people realize. Recent anecdotal evidence suggests the company has lost its lead in the AI race to Anthropic.[b] Many people here, on HN, who develop software prefer…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47669417&quot; title=&quot;We talk about Sam Altman a lot. At this point he has a Hollywood movie in post-production, a book (&amp;#39;The Optimist&amp;#39;), and a seemingly endless stream of profiles. It feels intellectually lazy to keep researching the same guy when the industry is moving beyond him. All evidence today suggests Anthropic is passing OpenAI in relative and absolute growth. So where&amp;#39;s the critical reporting? The DOD coverage was framed around the Pentagon&amp;#39;s decisions, not Anthropic&amp;#39;s. And nobody seems interested in…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical debate persists regarding the nature of AI, with disagreements over whether LLMs are merely &amp;#34;brute-force&amp;#34; pattern matchers or if their processes mirror human cognitive inference &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47668863&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t trust anyone who claims that LLMs today are superhumanly intelligent. All they do is perform compute-intensive brute-force attacks on the problem/solution space and call it &amp;#39;reasoning&amp;#39;, all while subsidising the real costs to capture the market. So much SciFi BS and extrapolation about a technology that is useful if adopted with care. This technology needs to become a commodity to destroy this aggregation of power between a few organizations with untrustworthy incentives and leadership.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47669138&quot; title=&quot;Your brain is performing &amp;#39;compute-intensive brute-force attacks on the problem/solution space&amp;#39; as you read this very sentence. You trained patterns on English syntax, structure, and semantics since you were a child and it is supporting you now with inference (or interpretation). And, for compute efficiency, you probably have evolution to thank.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, users are divided on product superiority, debating whether OpenAI’s tools or Claude are better suited for complex coding tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47660624&quot; title=&quot;Thank you for coming on HN and offering to answer questions.[a] This is a fantastic piece, very timely, evidently well-researched, and also well-written. Judging by the little that I know, it&amp;#39;s accurate. Thank you for doing the work and sharing it with the world. OpenAI may be in a more tenuous competitive position than many people realize. Recent anecdotal evidence suggests the company has lost its lead in the AI race to Anthropic.[b] Many people here, on HN, who develop software prefer…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47667380&quot; title=&quot;Many of us prefer OpenAI&amp;#39;s Codex, because we think it&amp;#39;s a better product. No comment on the CEO: I just find the product superior in everything but UI/UX and conversation. It&amp;#39;s better at quality code.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47667492&quot; title=&quot;Who is “us”? It does seem that some scientists prefer Codex for its math capabilities but when it comes to general frontend and backend construction, Claude Code is just as good and possibly made better with its extensive Skills library. Both codex and Claude code fail when it comes to extremely sophisticated programming for distributed systems&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/42796&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Issue: Claude Code is unusable for complex engineering tasks with Feb updates&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47660925&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1355 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 753 comments · by StanAngeloff&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A quantitative analysis of over 6,000 session logs reveals that Claude Code has become &amp;#34;unusable&amp;#34; for complex engineering due to a 70% reduction in research-before-editing and a 75% drop in thinking depth following February updates, leading to increased errors, &amp;#34;laziness,&amp;#34; and a 12x rise in user interruptions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/42796&quot; title=&quot;Title: [MODEL] Claude Code is unusable for complex engineering tasks with the Feb updates    URL Source: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/42796    Published Time: 2026-04-02T21:18:16.000Z    Markdown Content:  ### Preflight Checklist    *   This report does NOT contain sensitive information (API keys, passwords, etc.)     ### Type of Behavior Issue    Other unexpected behavior    ### What You Asked Claude to Do    Claude has regressed to the point it cannot be trusted to perform complex…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users report a significant degradation in Claude Code’s performance, citing a &amp;#34;rush to completion&amp;#34; behavior where the model prioritizes the &amp;#34;simplest fix&amp;#34; over correct, complex engineering &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47662808&quot; title=&quot;Not claude code specific, but I&amp;#39;ve been noticing this on Opus 4.6 models through Copilot and others as well. Whenever the phrase &amp;#39;simplest fix&amp;#39; appears, it&amp;#39;s time to pull the emergency break. This has gotten much, much worse over the past few weeks. It will produce completely useless code, knowingly (because up to that phrase the reasoning was correct) breaking things. Today another thing started happening which are phrases like &amp;#39;I&amp;#39;ve been burning too many tokens&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;this has taken too many…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664511&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s been more going on than just the default to medium level thinking - I&amp;#39;ll echo what others are saying, even on high effort there&amp;#39;s been a very significant increase in &amp;#39;rush to completion&amp;#39; behavior.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663541&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Whenever the phrase &amp;#39;simplest fix&amp;#39; appears, it&amp;#39;s time to pull the emergency break. Second! In CLAUDE.md, I have a full section NOT to ever do this, and how to ACTUALLY fix something. This has helped enormously.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While Anthropic staff attribute these changes to new UI defaults for &amp;#34;adaptive thinking&amp;#34; and a &amp;#34;medium effort&amp;#34; setting designed to balance latency and cost &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664442&quot; title=&quot;Hey all, Boris from the Claude Code team here. I just responded on the issue, and cross-posting here for input. --- Hi, thanks for the detailed analysis. Before I keep going, I wanted to say I appreciate the depth of thinking &amp;amp; care that went into this. There&amp;#39;s a lot here, I will try to break it down a bit. These are the two core things happening: &amp;gt; `redact-thinking-2026-02-12` This beta header hides thinking from the UI, since most people don&amp;#39;t look at it. It *does not* impact thinking itself,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, critics argue these adjustments constitute a stealthy degradation of a paid service &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663016&quot; title=&quot;That analysis is pretty brutal. It&amp;#39;s very disconcerting that they can sell access to a high quality model then just stealthily degrade it over time, effectively pulling the rug from under their customers.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664793&quot; title=&quot;Yeah LOL tell me I&amp;#39;m holding it wrong again. Actually Boris, I am tracking what is happening here. I see it, and I&amp;#39;m keeping receipts[0]. This started with the 4.6 rollout, specifically with the unearned confidence and not reading as much between writes. The flail quotient has gone right the hell up. If your evals aren&amp;#39;t showing that then bully for your evals I reckon. [0]: https://github.com/ctoth/claude-failures&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Some developers have resorted to extensive &amp;#34;guide rails&amp;#34; in configuration files to maintain quality, while others suggest the perceived decline may simply be the novelty of the new model wearing off &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47660970&quot; title=&quot;(Being true to the HN guidelines, I’ve used the title exactly as seen on the GitHub issue) I was wondering if anyone else is also experiencing this? I have personally found that I have to add more and more CLAUDE.md guide rails, and my CLAUDE.md files have been exploding since around mid-March, to the point where I actually started looking for information online and for other people collaborating my personal observations. This GH issue report sounds very plausible, but as with anything…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47662882&quot; title=&quot;This seems anecdotal but with extra words. I&amp;#39;m fairly sure this is just the &amp;#39;wow this is so much better than the previous-gen model&amp;#39; effect wearing off.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.0xsid.com/blog/wont-download-your-app&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I won&amp;#39;t download your app. The web version is a-ok&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0xsid.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47661439&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;928 points · 564 comments · by ssiddharth&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that companies deliberately degrade web experiences to force users into native apps, which offer less user control, more intrusive tracking, and bypass ad-blockers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.0xsid.com/blog/wont-download-your-app&quot; title=&quot;Title: No, I Won&amp;#39;t Download Your App. The Web Version is A-OK.    URL Source: https://www.0xsid.com/blog/wont-download-your-app    Markdown Content:  # No, I Won&amp;#39;t Download Your App. The Web Version is A-OK. | Sid&amp;#39;s Blog    [Sid&amp;#39;s](https://www.0xsid.com/)[Blog](https://www.0xsid.com/blog/)    # No, I Won&amp;#39;t Download Your App. The Web Version is A-OK.    Apr 6, 2026 | 921 words | 5 min read    As someone who prefers using services via their websites, I’ve gotten terribly jaded lately. Almost everyone wants…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a generational divide where older &amp;#34;power users&amp;#34; view smartphones as extensions of the desktop, while younger users treat them as their primary gateway to the internet &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47661819&quot; title=&quot;What most people dont get: Most of folks on HN here are much older than todays &amp;#39;first customers&amp;#39; of 16y/17/18 For them: The &amp;#39;Smartphone is the internet&amp;#39;, while for most of us the &amp;#39;Smartphone is an extension of the internet from our desktops&amp;#39; that we were used to (remember the years before dot com bubble, saying: &amp;#39;I will be down in the basement at the computer to surf on the net little bit&amp;#39; ? :-) But today, the very first touchpoint with &amp;#39;the internet&amp;#39; for younger folks is a smartphone display.…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47662241&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; But today, the very first touchpoint with &amp;#39;the internet&amp;#39; for younger folks is a smartphone display. The even do homework on this small screens! I saw a tweet recently that perfectly encapsulates this: for most people over 30, certain things are &amp;#39;big screen tasks&amp;#39;. I use my phone for a lot, but for some things I put the phone down and use my computer instead. I am most comfortable using a large screen and a keyboard for anything that requires writing more than a few words or using any…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47662124&quot; title=&quot;This hit the nail on the head. I find much of the HN community insightful and interesting, but in terms of consumer feedback (especially in a B2C environment) I wouldn&amp;#39;t touch feedback here with a 10-foot pole. I don&amp;#39;t mean that to be an insult, quite the opposite. Most people here are power users. But that is a galaxy away from how the average user interacts with the internet.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that younger generations are comfortable doing complex tasks like homework on small screens, others contend that laptops remain the standard for writing and that the &amp;#34;mobile-only&amp;#34; trend is driven more by a lack of filesystem understanding than preference &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47661953&quot; title=&quot;This. I posted this on my other comment, but there&amp;#39;s a meme that &amp;#39;Gen Z Kids Don&amp;#39;t Understand How File Systems Work&amp;#39; [0]. There seems to be a disconnect between some developers and the younger folks. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30253526&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47662241&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; But today, the very first touchpoint with &amp;#39;the internet&amp;#39; for younger folks is a smartphone display. The even do homework on this small screens! I saw a tweet recently that perfectly encapsulates this: for most people over 30, certain things are &amp;#39;big screen tasks&amp;#39;. I use my phone for a lot, but for some things I put the phone down and use my computer instead. I am most comfortable using a large screen and a keyboard for anything that requires writing more than a few words or using any…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47662465&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I personally find the idea of doing homework on my phone horrifying but I suppose kids today are either used to it and comfortable with it, or they&amp;#39;ve simply never used a computer and don&amp;#39;t know what they&amp;#39;re missing. Though I&amp;#39;d wager they probably aren&amp;#39;t comfortable typing on a keyboard. For college aged kids, most people are definitely not doing their homework on their phone. Many are still using paper and pencil. The one person I know who did do their homework on their phone tried to…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47662668&quot; title=&quot;I just asked my college aged kid.  He said pretty much everyone does their written homework on their laptop, but many will use their phones to do the reading.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. From a technical standpoint, users prefer the web for its sandboxed security and lack of invasive tracking, though some note that native apps offer better protection against server-side code injection and backdoors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47661633&quot; title=&quot;Web browser is a sandbox by default. Worst a sketchy site does is eat a tab, less if you run an adblocker. Native app? Background processes, hardware ID shenanigans, your contacts, location. The whole buffet.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664014&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Web browser is a sandbox by default. So I take this is a security concern. How do you feel about the fact that when you open a webapp in your browser, you re-download that app code every time? That the server can send you a backdoor every single time, made just for you, and nobody else will ever know? And that you can&amp;#39;t check the &amp;#39;hash&amp;#39; of the webapp, like you can with an app? On the other hand, an app is sandboxed, too (on mobile OSes like Android and iOS). When you download it, you can…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bramcohen.com/p/the-cult-of-vibe-coding-is-insane&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The cult of vibe coding is dogfooding run amok&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bramcohen.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664912&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;616 points · 511 comments · by drob518&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bram Cohen criticizes the &amp;#34;vibe coding&amp;#34; trend at Anthropic, arguing that extreme dogfooding led to poor-quality Claude source code because developers refused to manually inspect and guide the AI in cleaning up redundant, &amp;#34;spaghetti&amp;#34; logic. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bramcohen.com/p/the-cult-of-vibe-coding-is-insane&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Cult Of Vibe Coding Is Insane    URL Source: https://bramcohen.com/p/the-cult-of-vibe-coding-is-insane    Published Time: 2026-04-05T15:00:58+00:00    Markdown Content:  Claude had a leak of their source code, and [people have been having a whole lot of fun laughing at how bad it is](https://neuromatch.social/@jonny/116325668039992121). You might wonder how this could happen. The answer is dogfooding run amok.    Dogfooding is when you use your own product. It’s a good idea. But it can turn…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate centers on whether the messy source code of AI tools like Claude Code proves that &amp;#34;vibe coding&amp;#34; is a viable path to success or a technical debt trap. While some argue that shipping functional products has always involved violating traditional &amp;#34;good&amp;#34; code rules due to deadlines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47665285&quot; title=&quot;It’s truly strange that people keep citing the quality of Claude code’s leaked source as if it’s proof vibe coding doesn’t work. If anything, it’s the exact opposite. It shows that you can build a crazy popular &amp;amp; successful product while violating all the traditional rules about “good” code.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47665356&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; you can build a crazy popular &amp;amp; successful product while violating all the traditional rules about “good” code which has always been true&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47665731&quot; title=&quot;I suspect if people saw the handwritten code of many, many, many products that they used every day they would be shocked. I&amp;#39;ve worked at BigCos and startups, and a lot of the terrible code that makes it to production was shocking when I first started. This isn&amp;#39;t a dig at anyone, I&amp;#39;ve certainly shipped my share of bad code as well. Deadlines, despite my wishes sometimes, continue to exist. Sometimes you have to ship a hack to make a customer or manager happy, and then replacing those hacks with…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the resulting combinatorial complexity creates an objective maintenance burden that even AI will struggle to manage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47665414&quot; title=&quot;Yes, and to add, in case it&amp;#39;s not obvious: in my experience the maintenance, mental (and emotional costs, call me sensitive) cost of bad code compounds exponentially the more hacks you throw at it&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47665811&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m pretty sure that will be true with AI as well. No accounting for taste, but part of makes code hard for me to reason about is when it has lots of combinatorial complexity, where the amount of states that can happen makes it difficult to know all the possible good and bad states that your program can be in. Combinatorial complexity is something that objectively can be expensive for any form of computer, be it a human brain or silicon.  If the code is written in such a way that the number of…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a significant divide regarding how much a human must understand the underlying code, with opinions ranging from requiring total comprehension to accepting high-level conceptual oversight &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47665254&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; That wouldn’t even be a big violation of the vibe coding concept. You’re reading the innards a little but you’re only giving high-level, conceptual, abstract ideas about how problems should be solved. The machine is doing the vast majority, if not literally all, of the actual writing. Claude Code is being produced at AI Level 7 (Human specced, bots coded), whereas the author is arguing that AI Level 6 (Bots coded, human understands somewhat) yields substantially better results.  I happen to…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47665195&quot; title=&quot;AI is just another layer of abstraction. I&amp;#39;m sure the assembly language folks were grumbling about functions as being too abstracted at one point&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/arman-bd/guppylm&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: I built a tiny LLM to demystify how language models work&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47655408&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;914 points · 134 comments · by armanified&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer has released GuppyLM, a 9-million parameter transformer model built in 130 lines of PyTorch code to help others understand and train custom small-scale language models. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/arman-bd/guppylm&quot; title=&quot;Built a ~9M param LLM from scratch to understand how they actually work. Vanilla transformer, 60K synthetic conversations, ~130 lines of PyTorch. Trains in 5 min on a free Colab T4. The fish thinks the meaning of life is food.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Fork it and swap the personality for your own character.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users praised the project as an educational tool similar to Minix, noting that its limited &amp;#34;fish&amp;#34; persona provides an intuitive way to understand the constraints of small-scale models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47660830&quot; title=&quot;Is there some documentation for this? The code is probably the simplest (Not So) Large Language Model implementation possible, but it is not straight forward to understand for developers not familiar with multi-head attention, ReLU FFN, LayerNorm and learned positional embeddings. This projects shares similarities with Minix. Minix is still used at universities as an educational tool for teaching operating system design. Minix is the operating system that taught Linus Torvalds how to design…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47656073&quot; title=&quot;I love these kinds of educational implementations. I want to really praise the (unintentional?) nod to Nagel, by limiting capabilities to representation of a fish, the user is immediately able to understand the constraints. It can only talk like a fish cause it’s very simple Especially compared to public models, thats a really simple correspondence to grok intuitively (small LLM &amp;gt; only as verbose as a fish, larger LLM &amp;gt; more verbose) so kudos to the author for making that simple and fun.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debated the philosophical accuracy of the model&amp;#39;s output regarding the meaning of life &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47658213&quot; title=&quot;Finally an LLM that&amp;#39;s honest about its world model. &amp;#39;The meaning of life is food&amp;#39; is arguably less wrong than what you get from models 10,000x larger&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47659728&quot; title=&quot;Meaning/goal of life is to reproduce. Food (and everything else) is only a means to it. Reproduction is the only root goal given by nature to any life form. All resources and qualities are provided are only to help mating.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others questioned how the implementation compares to Andrej Karpathy’s well-known educational repositories like minGPT &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47658988&quot; title=&quot;How does this compare to Andrej Karpathy&amp;#39;s microgpt ( https://karpathy.github.io/2026/02/12/microgpt/ ) or minGPT ( https://github.com/karpathy/minGPT )?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47660479&quot; title=&quot;Who cares how it compares, it&amp;#39;s not a product it&amp;#39;s a cool project&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a suggestion that developers unfamiliar with transformer architecture should use larger LLMs to explain the code, or perhaps experiment with training similar models on minimalist languages like Toki Pona &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47660830&quot; title=&quot;Is there some documentation for this? The code is probably the simplest (Not So) Large Language Model implementation possible, but it is not straight forward to understand for developers not familiar with multi-head attention, ReLU FFN, LayerNorm and learned positional embeddings. This projects shares similarities with Minix. Minix is still used at universities as an educational tool for teaching operating system design. Minix is the operating system that taught Linus Torvalds how to design…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47661028&quot; title=&quot;give the code to an LLM and have a discussion about it.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47659731&quot; title=&quot;This really makes me think if it would be feasible to make an llm trained exclusively on toki pona ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toki_Pona )&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mining.com/france-pulls-last-gold-held-in-us-for-15b-gain/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;France pulls last gold held in US&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mining.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47658146&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;621 points · 361 comments · by teleforce&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;France has repatriated its final remaining gold reserves held in the United States, a move that resulted in a $15 billion gain. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mining.com/france-pulls-last-gold-held-in-us-for-15b-gain/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The request could not be satisfied    URL Source: https://www.mining.com/france-pulls-last-gold-held-in-us-for-15b-gain/    Warning: Target URL returned error 403: Forbidden    Markdown Content:  ## 403 ERROR    * * *     Request blocked. We can&amp;#39;t connect to the server for this app or website at this time. There might be too much traffic or a configuration error. Try again later, or contact the app or website owner.      If you provide content to customers through CloudFront, you can find steps to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The repatriation of France&amp;#39;s gold reserves has sparked debate over whether the reported $15 billion gain is a genuine profit or an accounting technicality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47658487&quot; title=&quot;This is not gain at all. At least in theory: You own some tons of gold at the start of the process, you have the same tons of gold at the end of the process. The only real gain is that you have gold in the US custody and the US can be tempted to just use it without telling you anything. In other words, you had &amp;#39;paper gold&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;virtual gold&amp;#39; that the US can confiscate anytime, for example after invading Greenland, blackmailing France to do nothing. You gain custody of what is yours.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47658261&quot; title=&quot;Good for France to relocate gold back to their own territory, but, uh, how can this result in a 15 B gain? &amp;#39;The overall size of France’s gold reserves still remained unchanged at roughly  2,437 tonnes, which are now entirely held at the BdF’s underground vault in La Souterraine.&amp;#39; Is this some special form of French accounting, where the gold becomes more valuable when it returns to French soil?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users clarify that the gain was &amp;#34;realized&amp;#34; by selling old bars in the US and purchasing new ones in Europe to avoid transport costs during a price surge &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47658725&quot; title=&quot;Is anyone here actually reading the article? Yes, they really made a gain of $15B: &amp;gt; But instead of refining and transporting the gold, it opted to sell the bars and purchase new bullion in Europe. […] Due to rising gold prices, the move helped the bank to generate a capital gain of 13 billion euros ($15 billion),&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47658623&quot; title=&quot;From the full press release: &amp;#39;In 2025 and at the start of 2026, while the volume of gold reserves remained  unchanged, the Banque de France had to align a residual portion (5%) with technical guidelines, resulting in a significant realised currency gain. This exceptional foreign exchange income totalled EUR 11 billion for 2025.&amp;#39; -- the keyword here likely being &amp;#39;realized&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others remain skeptical of how moving identical volumes of gold creates value &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47658261&quot; title=&quot;Good for France to relocate gold back to their own territory, but, uh, how can this result in a 15 B gain? &amp;#39;The overall size of France’s gold reserves still remained unchanged at roughly  2,437 tonnes, which are now entirely held at the BdF’s underground vault in La Souterraine.&amp;#39; Is this some special form of French accounting, where the gold becomes more valuable when it returns to French soil?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47658946&quot; title=&quot;Is the logic that it&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;unrealised&amp;#39; while the gold is stored in the US but becomes &amp;#39;realised&amp;#39; once it is stored in Paris? Why?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Historically, the discussion highlights Charles de Gaulle’s aggressive 1960s policy of converting dollars to physical gold via the French Navy, a move credited by some with exposing the inherent flaws of the Bretton Woods system &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47659308&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;However, an operation to repatriate its gold holdings began in the 1960s leading up to the US termination of the Bretton Woods system, which effectively stopped foreign governments from exchanging dollars for gold. French-US monetary history after WWII: Under the Bretton Woods agreement (1944-1971), the US dollar was the world’s reserve currency, and it was pegged to gold at $35 per ounce. Other countries pegged their currencies to the dollar. around 1965, De Gaulle initiated a systematic,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47661871&quot; title=&quot;You seem to imply that Charles de Gaulle and his policy of converting dollars to gold caused the collapse of the Bretton Woods system. That was a myopic view. The whole Bretton Woods system was doomed from the beginning due to design defects. The system was conceived with the primary goal of maintaining balance of payments equilibrium for all countries at the expense of economic growth and liquidity. It had become clear that if a country wanted its currency to be the world reserve currency it…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47659417&quot; title=&quot;De Gaulle was ahead of his time. He was very skeptical of the control that the US had over Europe through NATO. He left the alliance to build an independent French nuclear program which is paying dividends today amid the current leadership situation in the US.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some commenters question the historical accuracy of naval gold pickups, noting a lack of academic documentation for such high-profile events &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47660123&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; trade, then French Navy picked those gold bullions from NY I couldn’t find any clear news source or academic reference to that event. I see a lot of  references on gold buying/selling sites mostly. I would imagine a Fench Navy ship docked NY and loading tons of gold would make quite a stir.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/Suzierizzo1/status/2040864617467924865&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;81yo Dodgers fan can no longer get tickets because he doesn&amp;#39;t have a smartphone&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47662857&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;367 points · &lt;strong&gt;477 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by josephcsible&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An 81-year-old lifelong Dodgers season ticket holder is reportedly unable to access games after the team transitioned to a digital-only ticketing system that requires computer or smartphone navigation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/Suzierizzo1/status/2040864617467924865&quot; title=&quot;Title: Suzie rizzio on X: &amp;#39;This 81 year old man is a lifelong Dodgers fan &amp;amp; has been a season pass holder for over 50 years &amp;amp; was just told that he would no longer be allowed to get printed tickets only digital from now on &amp;amp; he’s barely able to navigate a computer &amp;amp; phone.Dodgers aren’t replying to anyone. https://t.co/mwQaHNKeLA&amp;#39; / X    URL Source: https://twitter.com/Suzierizzo1/status/2040864617467924865    Published Time: Tue, 07 Apr 2026 06:00:11 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Suzie rizzio on X:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Dodgers&amp;#39; transition to digital-only season tickets is framed by some as a necessary anti-scalping measure and a natural evolution away from obsolete technology &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663449&quot; title=&quot;From my quick research online, it seems they&amp;#39;ve gone digital-only for season tickets because they don&amp;#39;t want people just reselling them to turn a profit. They want actual season-long fans, so now if you transfer too many games they can track it and ban you. This is essentially anti-scalping. There&amp;#39;s a legit justification. You can still buy paper tickets at the stadium for a single game. But not for season passes anymore. Apparently they&amp;#39;ve been making exceptions for him in years past where he…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue that digital-only systems create significant barriers for the elderly and those with dexterity issues, suggesting that &amp;#34;technological illiteracy&amp;#34; or physical inability to use modern UX should be addressed through ADA-style accommodations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663266&quot; title=&quot;We need to extend the ADA to protect people who are not technologically-abled.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663603&quot; title=&quot;Have you had the pleasure of coaching a technologically illiterate grandparent through the process of learning how to use a smartphone? It’s a never-ending job and disheartening for all parties involved. Modern mobile UX is not designed with accessibility for the elderly in mind, and it is constantly changing in a way that demands constant re-learning. Not to mention the disabilities and neurological conditions often involved.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663411&quot; title=&quot;No, it&amp;#39;s not. If you are physically incapable of operating a piece of technology, the ADA covers reasonable accommodations for that. If you are simply unwilling to learn how to use a piece of technology, it doesn&amp;#39;t and shouldn&amp;#39;t cover that. Being a luddite is not a protected class.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond accessibility, commenters highlight that paper tickets offer superior reliability regarding battery life and privacy, noting that mandatory smartphone use often serves corporate data and control interests rather than fan convenience &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663732&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If this guy has the money for a season pass (!) he has the money for a smartphone. Maybe it&amp;#39;s not about the money. Maybe he does not want the negative consequences that come along with having a smartphone. Maybe he has dexterity issues that make using a smartphone difficult. Maybe he doesn&amp;#39;t want to install their invasive app. Maybe he finds that paper tickets are easier to manage. Maybe he recognizes that the vendor made this change to benefit themselves at the expense of the fans, as it…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663701&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s an amusement park we like to go to. We get season passes, which normally means renewing the small plastic card we got the first year. They&amp;#39;ve switched to app only this year, with the option of getting a card, if for some reason you cannot or will not use the app. I believe there&amp;#39;s a small fee for issuing the card. I believe their reasoning is much the same. They have some types of tickets, which can technically be handed over to others and abused. Think weekend ticket, where you hand…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663576&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; At some point, you have to cut off previous technologies because virtually everyone&amp;#39;s moved to something better. Perhaps. But in this case, they&amp;#39;ve moved to something worse. Digital tickets have their benefits, but paper tickets are still superior because they don&amp;#39;t tie you into big tech relationships and don&amp;#39;t require supporting infrastructure to work.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663667&quot; title=&quot;Paper also does not run out of battery or smash if you drop it.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://words.filippo.io/crqc-timeline/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A cryptography engineer&amp;#39;s perspective on quantum computing timelines&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (words.filippo.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47662234&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;548 points · 248 comments · by thadt&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Recent breakthroughs in quantum algorithms and hardware have accelerated the timeline for breaking classical encryption, leading experts to warn that post-quantum cryptography must be implemented by 2029 to mitigate imminent security risks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://words.filippo.io/crqc-timeline/&quot; title=&quot;Title: A Cryptography Engineer’s Perspective on Quantum Computing Timelines    URL Source: https://words.filippo.io/crqc-timeline/    Published Time: 2026-04-06T15:00:00Z    Markdown Content:  # A Cryptography Engineer’s Perspective on Quantum Computing Timelines  [![Image 1: Filippo Valsorda](https://assets.buttondown.email/images/1e8b4251-b3e2-4de1-9b95-9f5d0447644d.png)](https://filippo.io/) 6 Apr 2026  # A Cryptography Engineer’s Perspective on Quantum Computing Timelines    My position on the urgency…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate centers on whether quantum computing (QC) progress follows a linear path, with some arguing that the current inability to factor small RSA composites suggests a distant threat &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47665042&quot; title=&quot;What surprises me is how non-linear this argument is. For a classical attack on, for example RSA, it is very easy to a factor an 8-bit composite. It is a bit harder to factor a 64-bit composite. For a 256-bit composite you need some tricky math, etc. And people did all of that. People didn&amp;#39;t start out speculating that you can factor a 1024-bit composite and then one day out of the blue somebody did it. The weird thing we have right now is that quantum computers are absolutely hopeless doing…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, while experts contend that once fault-tolerant error correction is achieved, the jump to breaking large-scale encryption will be sudden &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47665092&quot; title=&quot;See https://bas.westerbaan.name/notes/2026/04/02/factoring.html and https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=9665#comment-2029013 which are linked to in the first section of the article. &amp;gt; Sure, papers about an abacus and a dog are funny and can make you look smart and contrarian on forums. But that’s not the job, and those arguments betray a lack of expertise. As Scott Aaronson said: &amp;gt; Once you understand quantum fault-tolerance, asking “so when are you going to factor 35 with Shor’s algorithm?” becomes…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While there is consensus on the urgency of deploying ML-KEM to prevent &amp;#34;store now, decrypt later&amp;#34; attacks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664342&quot; title=&quot;It should be noted that if indeed there has not remained much time until a usable quantum computer will become available, the priority is the deployment of FIPS 203 (ML-KEM) for the establishment of the secret session keys that are used in protocols like TLS or SSH. ML-KEM is intended to replace the traditional and the elliptic-curve variant of the Diffie-Hellman algorithm for creating a shared secret value. When FIPS 203, i.e. ML-KEM is not used, adversaries may record data transferred over…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664435&quot; title=&quot;That was my position until last year, and pretty much a consensus in the industry. What changed is that the new timeline might be so tight that (accounting for specification, rollout, and rotation time) the time to switch authentication has also come. ML-KEM deployment is tangentially touched on in the article because it&amp;#39;s both uncontroversial and underway, but: &amp;gt; This is not the article I wanted to write. I’ve had a pending draft for months now explaining we should ship PQ key exchange now,…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, disagreements persist over the necessity of hybrid algorithms to hedge against potential weaknesses in new post-quantum standards &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47665123&quot; title=&quot;I think the anti-hybrid argument the article makes is clearly wrong. Even if CRQCs existed today, we still should be using hybrid algorithms because even once CRQCs exist, they will be slow, expensive, and power hungry for at least a decade. The hybrid algorithms at a minimum make the cost of any attack ~$1M, which is way better than half of the PQC algorithms that made it to the 3rd stage of the PQC competition (2 of them can be broken on a laptop)&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47665561&quot; title=&quot;The absolute low end of cost of a QC is the cost of an MRI machine ~100k-400k (cost of cooling the computer to super low temps). Sure we expect QCs to get faster and cheaper over time, but putting 100% faith in the security of the PQC algorithms seems like a bad idea with no upside.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Some participants advocate for immediate migration of authentication protocols due to accelerating timelines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664435&quot; title=&quot;That was my position until last year, and pretty much a consensus in the industry. What changed is that the new timeline might be so tight that (accounting for specification, rollout, and rotation time) the time to switch authentication has also come. ML-KEM deployment is tangentially touched on in the article because it&amp;#39;s both uncontroversial and underway, but: &amp;gt; This is not the article I wanted to write. I’ve had a pending draft for months now explaining we should ship PQ key exchange now,…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47665380&quot; title=&quot;Is it? Your reasoning relies on this being true: &amp;gt; [CRQCs] will be slow, expensive, and power hungry for at least a decade How could you know that? What if it was 5 years? 1 year? 6 months? I predict there will be an insane global pivot once Q-day arrives. No nation wants to invest billions in science fiction. Every nation wants to invest billions in a practical reality of being able to read everyone&amp;#39;s secrets.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, though others warn this adds unnecessary overhead and should be managed through parallel certificate distribution &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664342&quot; title=&quot;It should be noted that if indeed there has not remained much time until a usable quantum computer will become available, the priority is the deployment of FIPS 203 (ML-KEM) for the establishment of the secret session keys that are used in protocols like TLS or SSH. ML-KEM is intended to replace the traditional and the elliptic-curve variant of the Diffie-Hellman algorithm for creating a shared secret value. When FIPS 203, i.e. ML-KEM is not used, adversaries may record data transferred over…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664552&quot; title=&quot;I agree with you that one must prepare for the transition to post-quantum signatures, so that when it becomes necessary the transition can be done immediately. However that does not mean that the switch should really be done as soon as it is possible, because it would add unnecessary overhead. This could be done by distributing a set of post-quantum certificates, while continuing to allow the use of the existing certificates. When necessary, the classic certificates could be revoked immediately.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.marketwatch.com/story/employers-are-using-your-personal-data-to-figure-out-the-lowest-salary-youll-accept-c2b968fb&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Employers use your personal data to figure out the lowest salary you&amp;#39;ll accept&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (marketwatch.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47655466&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;467 points · 295 comments · by thisislife2&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Companies are increasingly using personal data and algorithmic tools to predict the minimum salary a job candidate is willing to accept, potentially undermining traditional pay transparency and collective bargaining efforts. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.marketwatch.com/story/employers-are-using-your-personal-data-to-figure-out-the-lowest-salary-youll-accept-c2b968fb&quot; title=&quot;Title: marketwatch.com    URL Source: https://www.marketwatch.com/story/employers-are-using-your-personal-data-to-figure-out-the-lowest-salary-youll-accept-c2b968fb    Warning: Target URL returned error 401: Unauthorized  Warning: This page maybe requiring CAPTCHA, please make sure you are authorized to access this page.    Markdown Content:&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Negotiators highlight a significant information asymmetry in hiring, noting that companies often use credit checks or third-party services like Equifax’s &amp;#34;The Work Number&amp;#34; to uncover an applicant&amp;#39;s true salary history &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47659992&quot; title=&quot;Many years ago, back when companies could ask for your previous compensation [0], a hiring manager once said to me &amp;#39;don&amp;#39;t ever lie about your past compensation&amp;#39;. I wasn&amp;#39;t sure how they could figure this out at the time until someone later pointed out that many corporations do a credit history check on you as part of the background check. This gives them access to past compensation. The information asymmetry here is, as with much of hiring, pretty bonkers when they had both the current and past…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47655655&quot; title=&quot;One (more) thing to opt out of: Freeze Your Data - The Work Number https://employees.theworknumber.com/employee-data-freeze As I understand it, payroll whores your salary out to Equifax*, who then pimps it to others * Yeah, that one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Equifax_data_breach&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users suggest freezing this data to regain leverage, others point out that in countries like Sweden, tax filings are already public record, though this can create social friction between different income classes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47657325&quot; title=&quot;What a hassle! Here in Sweden, your tax filings are public information; companies can just ask the government what you made last year. I have no idea if they actually do, though, and the data will be somewhat obfuscated if you have extra income on the side.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47657745&quot; title=&quot;I earn like €100k per year. Not a huge salary, but definitely above average. My family lives in Eastern Europe. Once I was hanging out with my cousin and his friends, all of these people had minimum-wage jobs. Not really my type of social circle, but I have no issues being cool for an evening. Then suddenly my cousin drinks one too many and starts blabbering about how &amp;#39;fucking rich&amp;#39; I am and all eyes turn to me because guess what the whole group smelled an opportunity. Never spent time with…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47660011&quot; title=&quot;I don’t recall ever seeing a salary in my credit report. Certainly when applying for credit cards you are asked but generally they have you include all sources of income including bonus, passive income, and alimony. There are data sources for this info but I don’t think it’s technically a credit report.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Amidst these systemic hurdles, some contributors argue the only &amp;#34;winning game&amp;#34; is transitioning to self-employment or &amp;#34;soft-retirement&amp;#34; through aggressive financial optimization and lifestyle changes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47655988&quot; title=&quot;I wonder if the winning game becomes your own boss and tiny companies. I want to do the jump, but lack of courage, good ideas, sales skills and a very good salary still holding me back (open for suggestions).  But if the very good salary would go away, the scales tip instantly.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47656836&quot; title=&quot;Probably not the answer you want to here but I&amp;#39;ll share my perspective. Three years ago my wife and I sat down and optimized our finances so I could soft-retire and focus on a few of my life goals while simultaneously working on ways to generate income without the stress of being in the employ of others. It was tough work which mainly involved paying down a lot of debt so we can live more lean. We did a lot of optimization and of course some compromise and lifestyle changes. Fortunately, my…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47656411&quot; title=&quot;That was always the &amp;#39;winning game&amp;#39;.  Only problem is that&amp;#39;s a lot of work. The more things change, the more they stay the same; if you want more money, work harder.  People who don&amp;#39;t want to work harder complain that other people make more money because they either don&amp;#39;t understand or are in denial about the amount of work the people they envy put in. Yes there are exceptions.  No pointing out exceptions won&amp;#39;t help you, though it might make you temporarily feel better about yourself.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.wesnoth.org&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Battle for Wesnoth: open-source, turn-based strategy game&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (wesnoth.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664186&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;543 points · 163 comments · by akyuu&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Battle for Wesnoth website has implemented Anubis, a proof-of-work security system designed to protect its servers from aggressive AI web scraping and ensure site stability for legitimate users. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.wesnoth.org&quot; title=&quot;Title: Making sure you&amp;#39;re not a bot!    URL Source: https://www.wesnoth.org/    Markdown Content:  # Making sure you&amp;#39;re not a bot!    # Making sure you&amp;#39;re not a bot!    ![Image 1](https://www.wesnoth.org/.within.website/x/cmd/anubis/static/img/pensive.webp?cacheBuster=1.21.3)![Image 2](https://www.wesnoth.org/.within.website/x/cmd/anubis/static/img/happy.webp?cacheBuster=1.21.3)  Loading...    Why am I seeing this?  You are seeing this because the administrator of this website has set up Anubis to protect…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Battle for Wesnoth is celebrated as a high-quality open-source title with a vast universe of third-party content and a dedicated long-term community &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47665503&quot; title=&quot;Sweet! Does anyone have a list of high-quality open source games like this? (Subjective interpretation, but something like, &amp;#39;I couldn&amp;#39;t believe it&amp;#39;s free, I would have paid for it anyway.&amp;#39;)&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664550&quot; title=&quot;Grew up playing Wesnoth, still adore the game. There is a TON of third party content and a serious extended universe, too!&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664757&quot; title=&quot;I played the heck out of this about a decade ago. It&amp;#39;s an amazing game, and I&amp;#39;d love to return to it and see what has changed.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While users compared it to titles like *Age of Empires* or *Warcraft III*, a common mechanical criticism is that healers do not gain experience for healing, forcing players to use &amp;#34;squishy&amp;#34; units in combat to level them up &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664954&quot; title=&quot;My only gripe with the game is that healing doesn&amp;#39;t give XP to the healing units. This means you need to place them in combat to level up instead of placing them behind the fighters like they are intended to be, and with them initially having low health they are very squishy. I know you can kinda cheese it by reducing a monster to 1-2 HP and then getting them to attack, but it feels like going against their role.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47665397&quot; title=&quot;Interesting! Is this similar to Age of Empires?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47665098&quot; title=&quot;Never heard of this game. Is it similar to Warcraft III?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. The thread also highlights the &amp;#34;brutal&amp;#34; job market for new graduates, noting that even a lead developer with 12 years of C++ experience on the project has struggled to find work despite high recommendations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47665124&quot; title=&quot;Highly suggest connecting with one of the lead developers, Charles Dang/Vultraz, if you have any C++ jobs in the USA. He&amp;#39;s been a developer on Wesnoth since 2012 but only graduated university in 2024. Unfortunately, it&amp;#39;s been an absolutely brutal market for new graduates. Even if you&amp;#39;re a maintainer on one of the most popular OSS C++ projects on GitHub. I can&amp;#39;t recommend him enough. edit: LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/charles-dang-10994b1b4&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47665701&quot; title=&quot;I am very surprised if he can&amp;#39;t find a job, as an American, in DC, with 12 years of C++ experience. Sure companies aren&amp;#39;t great at assessing open source experience, but there is one area its easy to find a job as a dev: work that requires a clearance.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47665559&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Unfortunately, it&amp;#39;s been an absolutely brutal market for new graduates. Furthermore, more and more companies are looking for &amp;#39;professional&amp;#39; devs using AI tools such as Claude Code. By &amp;#39;professional&amp;#39; I mean proficient in using those AI tools, not actual knowledge. And they don&amp;#39;t even specify this in the job offer and you learn this during the interview.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://belief.horse/notes/what-being-ripped-off-taught-me/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What being ripped off taught me&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (belief.horse)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47660286&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;460 points · 225 comments · by doctorhandshake&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After working 24 consecutive days to rescue a failing augmented reality project in China, a consultant was defrauded of $35,000 by a California-based client. The experience highlighted the risks of ignoring red flags, the limitations of legal contracts, and the importance of trusting one&amp;#39;s professional intuition. &lt;a href=&quot;https://belief.horse/notes/what-being-ripped-off-taught-me/&quot; title=&quot;Title: What Being Ripped Off for $35k Taught Me | Belief Horse    URL Source: https://belief.horse/notes/what-being-ripped-off-taught-me/    Published Time: Mon, 06 Apr 2026 17:30:01 GMT    Markdown Content:  # What Being Ripped Off for $35k Taught Me | Belief Horse    [Belief Horse🐴](https://belief.horse/)[notes](https://belief.horse/notes) / Search     [Back to notes](https://belief.horse/notes)     April 05, 2026      •      8 min read     # What Being Ripped Off for $35k Taught…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The consensus among commenters is that professionals must stop working immediately if invoices are late, as continuing to work only increases the risk of total loss &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47660580&quot; title=&quot;Be paid or don&amp;#39;t work. I am so deadly serious - do not continue working if your invoices are late. You don&amp;#39;t have to be a jerk about it, just explain to your primary contact that you need to be paid and you pick up tools again when the money has arrived. BUT it is on YOU to properly negotiate reasonable payment terms. And if you don;t know or don&amp;#39;t trust the client then require payment in advance until a stronger commercial relationship can be settled in. Do not be a baby - go research business…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47660815&quot; title=&quot;We’ve also learned this lesson the hard way. These are now the clauses we require in every project we do: - Payment is due X days after receipt of invoice, or immediately after the consultant has addressed any quality issues, whichever is sooner - Late payment shall incur interest at 8% above the BoE base rate and a late fee of 100 GBP as per the UK Late Payment Legislation. Partial payments on invoices shall apply to late fees, interest, and then principal, in that order. - In the event of a…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Experienced contractors recommend using strict contract clauses that include late fees, interest, and the withholding of deliverables until payment is received &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47660815&quot; title=&quot;We’ve also learned this lesson the hard way. These are now the clauses we require in every project we do: - Payment is due X days after receipt of invoice, or immediately after the consultant has addressed any quality issues, whichever is sooner - Late payment shall incur interest at 8% above the BoE base rate and a late fee of 100 GBP as per the UK Late Payment Legislation. Partial payments on invoices shall apply to late fees, interest, and then principal, in that order. - In the event of a…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Personal anecdotes highlight the severe emotional and financial toll of non-payment, with some warning specifically against &amp;#34;incubator types&amp;#34; or VC-funded founders who may feel entitled to withhold funds &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47661272&quot; title=&quot;Worked in the SF tech scene since 2010, and so many founders who I found through YC/HN and AngelList failed to pay me over the years. Often paid late, but FIVE times, I never got paid at all, one time it was several thousands over the course of months and I almost pursued it in court, but in the end I took the L. It&amp;#39;s always these incubator types, they&amp;#39;re the absolute worst clients. They have the cash in the bank too, they often just forget or feel entitled and don&amp;#39;t want to back down. NEVER…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47666243&quot; title=&quot;Back in 2015 I worked for a startup.  I turned down a job at a more stable company because this startup had me doing Erlang and I really wanted to work with that. The job worked fine for about six months, and then one week my paycheck (which usually was on the second and fourth Wednesday of the month) wasn&amp;#39;t in my bank account.  I go the CEO of the company and mention this and he said something like &amp;#39;Oh yeah, something got fucked up with payroll man, don&amp;#39;t worry we&amp;#39;ll give you a double paycheck…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/matthartman/ghost-pepper&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Ghost Pepper – Local hold-to-talk speech-to-text for macOS&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47666024&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;466 points · 200 comments · by MattHart88&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ghost Pepper is an open-source, local speech-to-text tool for macOS that uses a hold-to-talk interface to process voice input privately without sending data to external servers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/matthartman/ghost-pepper&quot; title=&quot;I built this because I wanted to see how far I could get with a voice-to-text app that used 100% local models so no data left my computer. I&amp;amp;#x27;ve been using a ton for coding and emails. Experimenting with using it as a voice interface for my other agents too. 100% open-source MIT license, would love feedback, PRs, and ideas on where to take it.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a crowded market for local macOS speech-to-text tools, with several users noting they have independently built or were planning to build nearly identical apps &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47667921&quot; title=&quot;This thread is a support group for people who have each independently built the same macOS speech-to-text app.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47666577&quot; title=&quot;Thanks for sharing!  I was literally getting ready to build, essentially, this.  Now it looks like I don&amp;#39;t have to! Have you ever considered using a foot-pedal for PTT? Apple incidentally already has native STT, but for some reason they just don&amp;#39;t use a decent model yet.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some question the need for third-party apps over native OS dictation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47667743&quot; title=&quot;Not sure why I should use this instead of the baked-in OS dictation features (which I use almost daily--just double-tap the world key, and you&amp;#39;re there). What&amp;#39;s the advantage?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest technical improvements like using Parakeet for better accuracy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47666292&quot; title=&quot;Parakeet is significantly more accurate and faster than Whisper  if it supports your language.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt; or larger models to eliminate the need for post-transcription cleanup &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47666315&quot; title=&quot;Nice one! For Linux folks, I developed https://github.com/goodroot/hyprwhspr . On Linux, there&amp;#39;s access to the latest Cohere Transcribe model and it works very, very well. Requires a GPU though. Larger local models generally shouldn&amp;#39;t require a subordinate model for clean up. Have you compared WhisperKit to faster-whisper or similar? You might be able to run turbov3 successfully and negate the need for cleanup. Incidentally, waiting for Apple to blow this all up with native STT any day now. :)&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Comparisons were drawn to existing alternatives like Handy and Superwhisper &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47666394&quot; title=&quot;That’s awesome! Do you know how it compares to Handy? Handy is open source and local only too. It’s been around a while and what I’ve been using. https://github.com/cjpais/handy&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47669727&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m tracking them all here: https://opensource.builders/alternatives/superwhisper Just added Ghost Pepper, and you can actually create a skill.md with the features you need to build your own&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47669076&quot; title=&quot;https://handy.computer/ already exists?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, alongside curiosity regarding how older mobile hardware, such as the Pixel 6, achieved similar offline performance years ago &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47668726&quot; title=&quot;This is great, and I&amp;#39;m not knocking it, but every time I see these apps it reminds me of my phone. My 2021 Google Pixel 6, when offline, can transcribe speech to text, and also corrects things contextually. it can make a mistake, and as I continue to speak, it will go back and correct something earlier in the sentence. What tech does Google have shoved in there that predates Whisper and Qwen by five years? And why do we now need a 1Gb of transformers to do it on a more powerful platform?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://playlists.at/youtube/search/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: I made a YouTube search form with advanced filters&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (playlists.at)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47655392&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;324 points · 202 comments · by nevernothing&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Playlists.at has launched a new YouTube search tool that utilizes advanced filters and search prefixes to help users refine results and create custom playlists. &lt;a href=&quot;https://playlists.at/youtube/search/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Advanced Search for YouTube - Playlists.at    URL Source: https://playlists.at/youtube/search/    Published Time: Mon, 06 Apr 2026 14:38:46 GMT    Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.    Markdown Content:  # Advanced Search for YouTube - Playlists.at    ![Image 1: Playlists.at](https://playlists.at/youtube/logo.svg)    [Playlist Creator](https://playlists.at/youtube/)[AI…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users express deep frustration with YouTube&amp;#39;s declining search quality, noting that the platform often ignores specific keywords, fails to find videos within a user&amp;#39;s own watch history, and prioritizes unrelated &amp;#34;crap&amp;#34; or ads over relevant results &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47656008&quot; title=&quot;Search is the reason I stopped watching youtube, I used to view and discover so many nice stuff in there, tutorials, new hobbies, new music, new creators with different interests, etc but now it&amp;#39;s pretty much impossible to find, you are forced to watch the 3 top videos, some 3 ads and then it forces you to watch some other random unrelated crap, it&amp;#39;s so annoying and frustrating It got so bad that even searching the full tittle of the video doesnt show you that video haha&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47655915&quot; title=&quot;For April Fools Sega released an (actual, real) “Sanic the Hedgeheg” t-shirt and I wanted to see if there was anything about it on YouTube. YouTube assumed I meant “sonic” and it was impossible to correct it and say “no I’m actually searching for this dumb meme”. It just assumes everyone who uses YouTube is really dumb I guess. (I bought the shirt by the way and am excited to get it lol)&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47656562&quot; title=&quot;What got me really mad is searching your own history. There&amp;#39;s this &amp;#39;search watch history&amp;#39; on the https://www.youtube.com/feed/history I remember watching video that contains certain word in the title. A minecraft contraption from a small channel (4 videos, 93 subs). I searched that word in the title. But youtube can&amp;#39;t find it. Fortunately, I saved the world download that listed in the video with the name of the channel. So I searched the channel name + the word, it still can&amp;#39;t find it. So I…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that advanced operators like quotes or date filters still work, others contend that Google frequently ignores these commands, making it difficult to find niche content or specific memes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47655651&quot; title=&quot;This is just adding the hidden filters such as before:[date]: Finds videos uploaded before a specific date. Example: space exploration before:2020-01-01 after:[date]: Finds videos uploaded after a specific date. Example: tech news after:2024-01-01 To an UI, right?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47656089&quot; title=&quot;Just put the term in quotes &amp;#39;sanic the hedgeheg&amp;#39; ignore the suggestions and press enter to see the real results.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47656118&quot; title=&quot;Google no longer cares much about quotes. Sometimes it’ll take them seriously and sometimes not.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. The consensus suggests that while search works for mainstream trailers and broad tutorials, it has become nearly unusable for discovery, channel-specific queries, or precise recall &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47656882&quot; title=&quot;Can anyone describe the problem and use-case in more detail? I&amp;#39;ve heard this before but it just doesn&amp;#39;t resonate at all, and I&amp;#39;m a pretty heavy YouTube user. I mostly watch videos from my home feed or from channels I subscribe to. When I search it&amp;#39;s almost always either: - film/game trailers I&amp;#39;ve heard about and want to find (e.g. gta vi trailer) - videos I&amp;#39;ve watched before but maybe not liked, with a channel keyword and maybe video keyword (e.g. tom scott bell), or music - tutorials, where I…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47656129&quot; title=&quot;I still can’t believe they don’t let you search videos within a channel for example. Or filter out music playlist from video ones. Or search within transcripts. It’s peak irony a company owned by the search overlord.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://theamericanscholar.org/the-importance-of-being-idle/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Importance of Being Idle&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theamericanscholar.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47666639&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;315 points · 207 comments · by Caiero&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Robert Zaretsky explores the relevance of Paul Lafargue’s 19th-century essay, *The Right to Be Lazy*, arguing that modern AI advancements could finally fulfill Lafargue’s vision of using machines to emancipate humanity from labor and embrace the restorative value of idleness. &lt;a href=&quot;https://theamericanscholar.org/the-importance-of-being-idle/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Importance of Being Idle    URL Source: https://theamericanscholar.org/the-importance-of-being-idle/    Published Time: 2026-03-30T04:18:26+00:00    Markdown Content:  # The Importance of Being Idle - The American Scholar  [Skip to content](https://theamericanscholar.org/the-importance-of-being-idle/#fl-main-content)    ## Monday    ## April 13, 2026    [![Image 1:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion explores whether European &amp;#34;idleness&amp;#34; is a civilizational luxury or a strategic risk, with some arguing that a 36-hour work week may leave the continent vulnerable to harder-working global predators &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47700209&quot; title=&quot;I really do like the idea and the thinking behind it. I wpuld even argue that modern Europeans are already embracing and practicing much if it. Nearly no one I know in NL and DE works more than 36hrs per week. And we all have a sh”tload of holidays and irregular days off additionally. Need to get kids from school earlier? no prob… Need to spontanously (!) to go the dentist? no prob.   (Honest disclaimer: I am talking here solely about my white collar bubble, no idea about blue collar to be…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47700531&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Nearly no one I know in NL and DE works more than 36hrs per week. And we all have a sh”tload of holidays and irregular days off additionally. In DE I would argue that this is due to punitive taxes and I wouldn&amp;#39;t call it progress. Poor people work their asses 40+ hours and up to overwork since it&amp;#39;s always paid here. White collars work less time and often switch to 4 days because at this tax progression working your ass is not worth it. Time is more valuable, indifference curve is screwed. It…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view idleness as a spiritual practice of presence and creativity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47698847&quot; title=&quot;It feels like there is no correct translation for it in English -- idleness carries connotations of laziness whereas a better way to think about it is being aware and present of the moment. I have been practicing Buddhism for a while and it often is indescribably blissful to just sit in nature, feeling the wind in my hair and sun on my back. Anyone can experience this door with just a little bit of practice and I encourage everyone to try.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47698802&quot; title=&quot;I started with “How to Be Idle” by Hodgkinson about 20 years ago. Found “The importance of living “ by Lin yutang.  I now have a small collection of books about idleness… yet here i am working and then throwing myself into working on a century house in my spare time… feeling starved for idleness. Yet my most creative ideas for it come when I’m idle. Idleness led to Taoism, the pursuit of being useless. Led to Buddhism: just sit. As the quote sort of goes:  The great preponderance of society’s…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that Europe’s decline stems from poor leadership, broken markets, and a lack of geopolitical competition rather than a lack of effort &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47700356&quot; title=&quot;European who has travelled/lived extensively in China and the US. I don&amp;#39;t believe our problem is idleness. It&amp;#39;s instead a pernicious belief in peace. There&amp;#39;s no sense of geopolitical competition in society at large. We generate a lot of wealth in those 36 hours, but an immense amount of it is syphoned into areas that don&amp;#39;t help us get ahead. We are too invested in tides that lift all boats. Being well-rested is not the issue. Edit: I’ve recently started spending a lot of time in Switzerland and…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47702987&quot; title=&quot;Europe is not behind because Europeans are working less and taking more vacations. This message that is being loudly broadcasted hides the real problem. Europe is behind because we do not have good leadership. The decisions taken by leadership, no matter what level you look at - local, company, national, supranational - are rarely in the best interest of Europeans. Our markets - housing, rental, labor, capital, pension - are broken and therefore the population does not find opportunities to…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Disagreement persists over whether being &amp;#34;at the top&amp;#34; provides tangible benefits to the average citizen, or if the current work-life balance is merely a byproduct of punitive tax structures that disincentivize productivity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47700680&quot; title=&quot;Why should we care to be &amp;#39;at the top&amp;#39;? The average person gets no benefit from this; on the contrary, they would do a lot better if underperforming countries in Europe&amp;#39;s neighborhood raised their standards of living.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47700768&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The average person gets no benefit from this You are proving the point. The avg. person gets an enormous benefit from it, even in countries like USA, Japan or Korea with far less generous welfare. The gap in standards of living of somebody in the US and somebody in Georgia or Vietnam are ridiculous.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47700531&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Nearly no one I know in NL and DE works more than 36hrs per week. And we all have a sh”tload of holidays and irregular days off additionally. In DE I would argue that this is due to punitive taxes and I wouldn&amp;#39;t call it progress. Poor people work their asses 40+ hours and up to overwork since it&amp;#39;s always paid here. White collars work less time and often switch to 4 days because at this tax progression working your ass is not worth it. Time is more valuable, indifference curve is screwed. It…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.osnews.com/story/144737/adobe-secretly-modifies-your-hosts-file-for-the-stupidest-reason/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Adobe modifies hosts file to detect whether Creative Cloud is installed&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (osnews.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664205&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;342 points · 172 comments · by rglullis&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Adobe is secretly modifying Windows and macOS hosts files to bypass browser security restrictions, allowing its website to detect if Creative Cloud is installed on a user&amp;#39;s system. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.osnews.com/story/144737/adobe-secretly-modifies-your-hosts-file-for-the-stupidest-reason/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Adobe secretly modifies your hosts file for the stupidest reason – OSnews    URL Source: https://www.osnews.com/story/144737/adobe-secretly-modifies-your-hosts-file-for-the-stupidest-reason/    Markdown Content:  # Adobe secretly modifies your hosts file for the stupidest reason – OSnews    ## [![Image 1: OSnews](https://www.osnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/logo.gif)](https://www.osnews.com/)    *   [Popular…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the ethics of software modifying system configurations, with many arguing that applications should be restricted to their own directories and that operating systems should require explicit consent for changes to files like `/etc/hosts` &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47666042&quot; title=&quot;As a general principle, application developers should not have free rein to modify my system&amp;#39;s configuration, and OS&amp;#39;s should do their part to make it very difficult for developers. Installing your binaries into C:\Program Files\AppName or /usr/local/bin? Fine. Dumping crap all over C:\Windows or /usr or /boot or something? No way--the OS should make the developer obtain my consent (not just a blanket sudo-like escalation) to do these things. Sneakily modifying /etc/hosts to act against me? Get…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47666572&quot; title=&quot;I thought the days if needing to &amp;#39;sudo&amp;#39; to install applications on windows were long gone; doesn&amp;#39;t basically everything happily do user installations now?  I would view a demand to escalate as basically proof that the application is about to do something janky, if not outright malicious.  On linux, if I can&amp;#39;t build and run software with just my user account, that software has some explaining to do.  Virtually every desktop application should be able to run without escalated privileges.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some defend the practice as a functional way to detect installed apps for &amp;#34;Open in Desktop&amp;#34; features, critics counter that using the hosts file for web-based tracking is a novel and &amp;#34;janky&amp;#34; execution &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664459&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Reason is OK, the execution is controversial. And even then, only controversial to nerds with opinions. Nothing else about it is controversial. If anything, knowing whether the app is installed or not is kinda important? If you open a file shared with you in the browser, the option to &amp;#39;Open in Desktop&amp;#39; versus &amp;#39;Install Desktop App&amp;#39; actually works correctly?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664758&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; For anyone hand-wringing over this, this used to be normal . People editing hosts files for other reasons was normal (a long time ago-- and it stopped being normal for valid reasons, as tech evolved and the shortcomings of that system were solved). A program automatically editing the hosts file and its website using that to detect information about the website visitor is not the same thing; that usage is novel and was never &amp;#39;normal.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47666572&quot; title=&quot;I thought the days if needing to &amp;#39;sudo&amp;#39; to install applications on windows were long gone; doesn&amp;#39;t basically everything happily do user installations now?  I would view a demand to escalate as basically proof that the application is about to do something janky, if not outright malicious.  On linux, if I can&amp;#39;t build and run software with just my user account, that software has some explaining to do.  Virtually every desktop application should be able to run without escalated privileges.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a notable disagreement over OS restrictions: some believe strict lockdowns are necessary to prevent developer overreach, while others argue these measures often unfairly strip power from the end user rather than just the developer &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47667223&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; As a general principle, application developers should not have free rein to modify my system&amp;#39;s configuration, and OS&amp;#39;s should do their part to make it very difficult for developers. Funny enough macOS, iOS, iPadOS and Android do this and they are constantly attacked for it. I do think there needs to be more strict adherence by developers to standards like XDG but I don’t know how it could be enforced.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47667339&quot; title=&quot;They are constantly attacked because they prevent users from modifying the system configuration, not just app developers.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/exQUIZitely/status/2040777977521398151&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The 1987 game “The Last Ninja” was 40 kilobytes&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47656501&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;309 points · 192 comments · by keepamovin&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 1987 video game &amp;#34;The Last Ninja&amp;#34; was remarkably contained within a file size of only 40 kilobytes. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/exQUIZitely/status/2040777977521398151&quot; title=&quot;# JavaScript is not available.    We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using x.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.    [Help Center](https://help.x.com/using-x/x-supported-browsers)    [Terms of Service](https://x.com/tos)  [Privacy Policy](https://x.com/privacy)  [Cookie Policy](https://support.x.com/articles/20170514)  [Imprint](https://legal.twitter.com/imprint.html)  [Ads…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a stark contrast between the extreme constraints of 1980s computing and the perceived &amp;#34;waste&amp;#34; in modern software, where production services often use gigabytes of memory for megabytes of actual data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47657126&quot; title=&quot;I was looking at a production service we run that was using a few GBs of memory. When I add up all the actual data needed in a naive compact representation I end up with a few MBs. So much waste. That&amp;#39;s before thinking of clever ways to compress, or de-duplicate or rearrange that data. Back in the day getting the 16KB expansion pack for my 1KB RAM ZX81 was a big deal. And I also wrote code for PIC microcontrollers that have 768 bytes of program memory [and 25 bytes of RAM]. It&amp;#39;s just so easy to…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47658241&quot; title=&quot;Sure, if you don’t count safety features like memory management, crash handling, automatic bounds checks and encryption cyphers; as anything useful. I do completely agree that there is a lot of waste in modern software. But equally there is also a lot more that has to be included in modern software that wasn’t ever a concern in the 80s. Networking stacks, safety checks, encryption stacks, etc all contribute massively to software “bloat”. You can see how this quickly adds up if you write a…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that modern bloat is a necessary cost for safety features, high-resolution assets, and developer productivity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47658241&quot; title=&quot;Sure, if you don’t count safety features like memory management, crash handling, automatic bounds checks and encryption cyphers; as anything useful. I do completely agree that there is a lot of waste in modern software. But equally there is also a lot more that has to be included in modern software that wasn’t ever a concern in the 80s. Networking stacks, safety checks, encryption stacks, etc all contribute massively to software “bloat”. You can see how this quickly adds up if you write a…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47658403&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Go&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;GC disadvantage&amp;#39; is turned on its head by developing &amp;#39;Zero Allocation&amp;#39; libraries which run blazingly fast with fixed memory footprints. Similarly, rolling your own high performance/efficient code where it matters can save tremendous amounts of memory where it matters. The savings there would be negligible (in modern terms) but the development cost would be significantly increased. &amp;gt; Of course more features and safety nets will consume memory, but we don&amp;#39;t have to waste it like there are…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others point to the &amp;#34;demoscene&amp;#34; and specialized libraries as proof that high-performance, feature-rich software can still be written with a tiny footprint &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47658265&quot; title=&quot;Yes, but this doesn&amp;#39;t prevent you from being mindful and selecting the right tools with smaller memory footprint while providing the features you need. Go&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;GC disadvantage&amp;#39; is turned on its head by developing &amp;#39;Zero Allocation&amp;#39; libraries which run blazingly fast with fixed memory footprints. Similarly, rolling your own high performance/efficient code where it matters can save tremendous amounts of memory where it matters. Of course more features and safety nets will consume memory, but we…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics of modern trends suggest that current software complexity—driven by tools like Electron and heavy compilers—has outpaced hardware improvements, leading to &amp;#34;crappy software&amp;#34; running on impressive CPUs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47658424&quot; title=&quot;Back the day people had BASIC and some machines had Forth and it was like print &amp;#39;Hello world&amp;#39; or .&amp;#39; Hello world &amp;#39; / .( Hello world ) for Forth. By comparison, giving how they optimized the games for 8 and 16 bit machines I should have been able to compile Cataclysm DDA:BN under my potato netbook and yet it needs GIGABYTES of RAM to compile, it crazy that you need damn swap for something it required far less RAM 15 years ago for the same features. If the game was reimplemented in Golang it…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47658991&quot; title=&quot;Compare Limbo+Tk under Inferno with current C#/Java. Or C++ against Plan9C. We have impressive CPU&amp;#39;s running really crappy software. Remember Claude Code asking 66GB for a damn CLI AI agent for something NetBSD under a Vax (real or physical) from 1978 could do with NCurses in miliseconds every time you spawn Nethack or any other NCurses tool/game. On speed, Forth for the ACE was faster than Basic running under the ZX80. So, it wasn&amp;#39;t about using a text-parsed language. Forth was fast, but…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://krebsonsecurity.com/2026/04/germany-doxes-unkn-head-of-ru-ransomware-gangs-revil-gandcrab/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;German police name alleged leaders of GandCrab and REvil ransomware groups&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (krebsonsecurity.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47660954&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;323 points · 160 comments · by Bender&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;German police have identified 31-year-old Russian Daniil Maksimovich Shchukin as &amp;#34;UNKN,&amp;#34; the alleged leader of the GandCrab and REvil ransomware groups responsible for extorting millions of euros worldwide. &lt;a href=&quot;https://krebsonsecurity.com/2026/04/germany-doxes-unkn-head-of-ru-ransomware-gangs-revil-gandcrab/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Germany Doxes “UNKN,” Head of RU Ransomware Gangs REvil, GandCrab    URL Source: https://krebsonsecurity.com/2026/04/germany-doxes-unkn-head-of-ru-ransomware-gangs-revil-gandcrab/    Published Time: Tue, 07 Apr 2026 05:57:03 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Germany Doxes “UNKN,” Head of RU Ransomware Gangs REvil, GandCrab – Krebs on Security    Advertisement    [![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the linguistic and ethical implications of using the term &amp;#34;doxxing&amp;#34; to describe law enforcement unmasking criminal suspects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47662303&quot; title=&quot;Putting someone on a (most) wanted list is &amp;#39;doxing&amp;#39;? [Edit] &amp;#39;An international search is underway for Daniil Maksimovich SHCHUKIN on suspicion of numerous counts of gang-related and commercial extortion using ransomware to the detriment of commercial enterprises, public facilities, and institutions.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47661978&quot; title=&quot;Feels odd for an infosec blog to use &amp;#39;doxxing&amp;#39; this way. Doxxing is generally considered to be unethical exposure of personal information. Identifying a criminal is ethical.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that linking an alias to a real identity is the literal definition of doxxing regardless of intent &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47662569&quot; title=&quot;If someone wasn&amp;#39;t previously known, only an alias or alter-ego, but you then link those together with a real-life identity, that&amp;#39;s very much the definition of &amp;#39;doxxing&amp;#39;, at least the original definition, maybe it&amp;#39;s different today? Positive or negative doesn&amp;#39;t really matter, just like &amp;#39;shooting&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;jumping&amp;#39; in itself isn&amp;#39;t positive or negative, it&amp;#39;s just a verb.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend the term implies an unethical violation of privacy that should not apply to legitimate legal proceedings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47662400&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, I’m not okay with this. Doxxing is a term with an extremely negative connotation and is often done to people who, bluntly, weren’t hiding or doing anything wrong. The correct term for the same act here is either “accuse” or “unmask”.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47662359&quot; title=&quot;Certainly, criminals also have a right to privacy. However, the limited publication of personal data of criminals by law enforcement is generally a legally legitimate measure. Doxxing, on the other hand, is generally a process that violates the fundamental right to privacy.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. This sparked a philosophical debate over whether state-sanctioned identification is inherently &amp;#34;moral&amp;#34; or simply a &amp;#34;least-worst&amp;#34; necessity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47662012&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Identifying a criminal is ethical. This outsourcing of one&amp;#39;s morals to the state is excessive even by already high western white collar internet standards. Now, make no mistake, these guys are up to no good and probably should be identified and prosecuted, but to just declare that a bad thing is now good because government is doing it is basically an abdication of one&amp;#39;s moral compass.   At best this is still a bad thing but a necessary one because all the other options are worse.  Like…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47662533&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;criminals &amp;gt;law &amp;gt;legally You keep using these words but it causes circular logic as those are all defined by the same entity that is acting unilaterally. The action the government took was not a &amp;#39;good&amp;#39; action by any moral standard.  But it was perhaps the least worse action available all things considered.  Can&amp;#39;t just whisk people off the street in a foreign country or drone them over such matters, those options would be worse.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664981&quot; title=&quot;Some of the comments here (and lately on HN in general) are very concerning to me. Are we really going to pretend that people accused of real crimes shouldn’t be arrested, charged and, if found guilty, have an appropriate sentence? It doesn’t take many more than 2 brain cells rubbing together to see that that won’t end well. Whataboutism, political differences, and even real injustices in my opinion do not make this a reasonable position.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, users noted that some suspects had previously been unmasked by the Chaos Computer Club (CCC), highlighting the complex relationship between independent hackers and state investigators &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663148&quot; title=&quot;So apparently some CCC-connected hackers already unmasked one of them years ago (as reported in the update, which could have also just linked to the talk here: https://media.ccc.de/v/37c3-12134-hirne_hacken_hackback_edit... ) Makes you wonder if the investigators discovered this independently, or decided to maybe ask the hackers already involved in defending against them for help...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664771&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not deep into the topic, but AFAIK there generally isn&amp;#39;t a warm connection between the CCC and the BND in Germany (in the recent years mostly due to the BNDs involvement ins spying on German citizens, but I think there is also deeper history there). If a hacker collaborates with the BND they do run a risk of many of their peers not wanting to collaborate with them anymore.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.freestyle.sh/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Launch HN: Freestyle – Sandboxes for Coding Agents&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (freestyle.sh)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663147&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;322 points · 156 comments · by benswerd&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Freestyle is a cloud platform providing high-performance Linux sandboxes for coding agents, featuring sub-second startup times and the ability to horizontally fork a virtual machine&amp;#39;s entire memory state with minimal latency. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.freestyle.sh/&quot; title=&quot;We’re Ben and Jacob, cofounders of Freestyle (&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;freestyle.sh&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;freestyle.sh&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;). We’re building a cloud for  Coding Agents.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;For the first generation of agents it looked like workflows with minimal tools. 2 years ago we published a package to let AI work in SQL, at that time GPT-4 could write simple scripts. Soon after the first AI App Builders started using AI to make whole websites; we supported that with a serverless deploy system.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;But the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Freestyle provides isolated execution environments for coding agents, distinguishing itself through a &amp;#34;forking&amp;#34; feature that allows agents to branch and test multiple ideas in parallel from an exact state &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664499&quot; title=&quot;I’m super interested since it seems like you have given everything a lot of thought and effort but I am not sure I understand it. When I’m thinking of sandboxes, I’m thinking of isolated execution environments. What does forking sandboxes bring me? What do your sandboxes in general bring me? Please take this in the best possible way: I’m missing a use case example that’s not abstract and/or small. What’s the end goal here(&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664623&quot; title=&quot;So isolation is correct. Forking a sandbox gives you multiple exact duplicates of isolated environments. When your coding agent has 10 ideas for what to do, to evaluate them correctly it needs to be able to evaluate them in isolation. If you&amp;#39;re building a website testing agent and halfway down a website, with a form half filled out a session ongoing, etc and it realizes it wants to test 2 things in isolation, forking is the only way. We also envision this powering the next generation of…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While users questioned the specific use cases and technical feasibility of copying 8GB of RAM in under 500ms, the creators explained they use Copy-on-Write (COW) techniques to ensure fork time remains constant regardless of VM size &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47667286&quot; title=&quot;Congrats guys!  Would share some technical details, I bet you have great stories to tell.  Let’s, what is forking? You completely copy disk, make ram snapshot and run it? If CoW, but ram? You mentioned 8GB ram vms. Sounds like impossible to copy 8Gb under 500ms, also disk?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47667533&quot; title=&quot;So fork time is actually O(1) with VM size, its 500ms even for 64gb + disk. We&amp;#39;re using some pretty weird COW techniques to pull it off.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Compared to competitors like Fly.io Sprites, Freestyle emphasizes its templating utilities and debugging experience, though it lacks Fly&amp;#39;s advanced networking stack &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663754&quot; title=&quot;Would love to understand how you compare to other providers like Modal, Daytona, Blaxel, E2B and Vercel. I think most other agent builders will have the same question. Can you provide a feature/performance comparison matrix to make this easier?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664021&quot; title=&quot;Fly.io sprites is the most similar to us of the bunch. They do hardware virtualization as well, have comparable start times and are full Linux. What we call snapshots they call checkpoints. The big pros of Sprites over us is their advanced networking stack and the Fly.io ecosystem. The big cons are that Sprites are incredibly bare bones — they don&amp;#39;t have any templating utilities. I&amp;#39;ve also heard that Sprites sometimes become unavailable for extended periods of time. The big pros of Freestyle…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Security is a central theme, with the consensus being that agents should run in these untrusted, isolated sandboxes to prevent unauthorized access to developer permissions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664710&quot; title=&quot;Agreed, the thing I&amp;#39;d be most interested in is the isolated execution environment you mentioned. Agents running autopilot are powerful. Agents running unsupervised on a machine with developer permissions and certificates where anything could influence the agent to act on an attacker&amp;#39;s behalf is terrifying&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664743&quot; title=&quot;I recommend running the agent harness outside of the computer. The mental model I like to use is the computer is a tool the agent is using, and anything in the computer is untrusted.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/a-truck-drive-spent-20-years-making-this-astonishing-scale-model-of-every-single-building-in-new-york-city-180988443/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A truck driver spent 20 years making a scale model of every building in NYC&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (smithsonianmag.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47657268&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;406 points · 70 comments · by 1659447091&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/a-truck-drive-spent-20-years-making-this-astonishing-scale-model-of-every-single-building-in-new-york-city-180988443/&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the staggering scale of the project, with commenters calculating that the artist would have needed to complete roughly 100 to 130 structures per day to reach his goal &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47680775&quot; title=&quot;20 * 365.25 = 7305 days. Assuming their &amp;#39;near a million buildings&amp;#39; number tracks to somewhere around 950,000, he would have had to build 130 &amp;#39;structures&amp;#39; a day on average. This is all round and not precise numbers, considering he had to have days where he couldn&amp;#39;t build, I&amp;#39;m guessing on the number of structures, and he started in 2004 (22 years ago), accuracy is not possible. But still, even if we fudged it down to 100 structures a day: This is BONKERS. The man has a prodigious skill at…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate whether the &amp;#34;truck driver&amp;#34; label is a condescending class-based descriptor &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47686610&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Truck driver&amp;#39; here serving only to put him down, because the feat wouldn&amp;#39;t be expected of such a person? Seems to me like papers&amp;#39; infamous (at least in the UK) references to victims&amp;#39; or alleged perpatrators&amp;#39; house prices, to instruct our sympathy, when it&amp;#39;s not otherwise at all relevant.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47680223&quot; title=&quot;Why is it relevant what he does for a living? It&amp;#39;s his passion and hobby that is interesting.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47680458&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; “We were all standing around squealing, ‘Look, there’s our museum!’ ‘There’s the Met; there’s the Guggenheim,’” Sherman recalls. “It’s this great act of recognition, and then it’s also witnessing [Macken’s] creativity, how he made this complex architecture out of very humble materials.” Blue collar, dedicated, skillful effort over decades immediately co-opted by nonsense-spewer.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue it highlights the extraordinary dedication of an &amp;#34;ordinary guy&amp;#34; using humble materials rather than professional tools or deep pockets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47680520&quot; title=&quot;Looking at the level of detail, and the thoroughness, I wouldn&amp;#39;t have expected it to even be possible to complete it in 20 years. How much time does this guy spend driving truck? Amazing accomplishment and display of dedication and creativity.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47680315&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Why is it relevant... I&amp;#39;d say the point is &amp;#39;An Ordinary Guy did X&amp;#39;.  Vs. an engineering genius, or somebody with deep pockets, or a Hollywood special effects model builder, or 3D printer junkie, or whatever.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Participants also shared related projects, such as a 1:1 Minecraft replica of New York and a tragic 19th-century model of Prague &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47681579&quot; title=&quot;If you are interested in scale models of New York, there&amp;#39;s a 1:1 scale model in Minecraft: https://youtu.be/ZouSJWXFBPk&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47681598&quot; title=&quot;There is a miniature of Prague from around 1830 by Antonín Langweil. He dedicated his all free time to finish it in a hope of making money for his daughters. Langweil never found a benefactor for his work and he died poor. Pretty tragic story. https://www.muzeumprahy.cz/en/visit-langweils-model-of-pragu...&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.govauctions.app/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: GovAuctions lets you browse government auctions at once&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (govauctions.app)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47662945&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;319 points · 90 comments · by player_piano&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GovAuctions is a new platform that aggregates listings from various government surplus and seizure sites into a single searchable interface, allowing users to filter by location and price while receiving alerts for new items. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.govauctions.app/&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;amp;#x27;ve long been into finding deals on government auction sites (seizures, surplus sales etc.) - right now for example San Diego DHS is selling 26 tons of lead shot, with bidding starting at $1,000 ¯\_(ツ)_&amp;amp;#x2F;¯&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;It has historically been extremely tedious though: scanning dozens of janky sites which have interminable page loading times; back buttons take you all the way back to the homepage etc.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;The site I built - GovAuctions - lets you search every government surplus auction at once.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users praised the tool for uncovering &amp;#34;weird and wonderful&amp;#34; listings, such as 26 tons of lead shot, a $1.5M Blackhawk helicopter, and a $5,000 crane &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663327&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; right now for example San Diego DHS is selling 26 tons of lead shot, with bidding starting at $1,000 If that&amp;#39;s not enough for you then there&amp;#39;s another auction too! https://www.govauctions.app/auction/gsa-4-1-QSC-I-26-226-002&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47666906&quot; title=&quot;I had no idea one could buy a Blackhawk for $1.5M&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663682&quot; title=&quot;It is truly a weird and wonderful world of things you can buy out there. Last year I contemplated buying a 100-tonne crane in New Jersey, which was going for about $5,000. The only issue was that you had to go pick it up yourself...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While the developer quickly implemented a requested feature to include search parameters in URLs, users also suggested adding RSS feeds and more granular filters for categories like vehicle mileage or repair status &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47665431&quot; title=&quot;Suggestions: Put the parameters into the url so searches can be bookmarked, like zip codes, terms, filters, and other aspects can be shared easily as well. Description search both include (like i7, 16GB) which is good for electronics and exclude for example exclude &amp;#39;repair&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;needs repair&amp;#39; which is helpful for many things. Category specific filters, vehicle millage range, year Keywords classification filters like pickup, delivery, payment methods, how many days you have to pay if known, etc.…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47665564&quot; title=&quot;I second the search parameters in URL. RSS feed of search page would also be great.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47665681&quot; title=&quot;RSS Feeds of searches would be great, I know alerts exist, but for this community being able to get data through alternative methods, especially RSS is very appreciated.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47665828&quot; title=&quot;Noted. Crazy that as I was building this I was wondering whether I should be designing it as much for agent browsing as for humans. Update: search params are now passed into the URL&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also touched on the logistical &amp;#34;catch&amp;#34; of these auctions, noting that buyers often face significant hurdles regarding in-person pickup and potential property defects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664931&quot; title=&quot;Very interesting project! Can anyone comment on what the buying process is like? Specifically if there are any weird hoops to jump through or if it&amp;#39;s a normal account signup and payment process. Is delivery available or do these need to be picked up in person?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47666851&quot; title=&quot;What is the catch with these real estate auctions? Certainly a $60k house is a deal even if it had a bad roof full of asbestos.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663682&quot; title=&quot;It is truly a weird and wonderful world of things you can buy out there. Last year I contemplated buying a 100-tonne crane in New Jersey, which was going for about $5,000. The only issue was that you had to go pick it up yourself...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-04-05</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-04-05</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ergosphere.blog/posts/the-machines-are-fine/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The threat is comfortable drift toward not understanding what you&amp;#39;re doing&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ergosphere.blog)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647788&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;853 points · 567 comments · by zaikunzhang&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author warns that over-reliance on AI in academia risks producing researchers who can generate publishable results but lack the fundamental intuition and understanding gained through &amp;#34;grunt work&amp;#34; and failure. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ergosphere.blog/posts/the-machines-are-fine/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The machines are fine. I&amp;#39;m worried about us.    URL Source: https://ergosphere.blog/posts/the-machines-are-fine/    Published Time: Sun, 05 Apr 2026 13:42:41 GMT    Markdown Content:  # The machines are fine. I&amp;#39;m worried about us.    [← Back](https://ergosphere.blog/posts)    # The machines are fine. I&amp;#39;m worried about us.    Mar 30,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of AI agents has sparked a debate over whether traditional foundational skills are becoming obsolete or if their loss creates a dangerous &amp;#34;knowledge gap&amp;#34; that prevents users from handling complex, novel problems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47648380&quot; title=&quot;The thing is, agents aren’t going away. So if Bob can do things with agents, he can do things. I mourn the loss of working on intellectually stimulating programming problems, but that’s a part of my job that’s fading. I need to decide if the remaining work - understanding requirements, managing teams, what have you - is still enjoyable enough to continue. To be honest, I’m looking at leaving software because the job has turned into a different sort of thing than what I signed up for. So I think…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47648420&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; So if Bob can do things with agents, he can do things. The problem arrises when Bob encounters a problem too complex or unique for agents to solve. To me, it seems a bit like the difference between learning how to cook versus buying microwave dinners. Sure, a good microwave dinner can taste really good, and it will be a lot better than what a beginning cook will make. But imagine aspiring cooks just buying premade meals because &amp;#39;those aren&amp;#39;t going anywhere&amp;#39;. Over the span of years, eventually…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that while LLMs can produce professional-looking results, they often &amp;#34;fake&amp;#34; accuracy, requiring an expert with years of manual experience to detect errors—a level of expertise that future generations may never develop if they skip the &amp;#34;first 10 rungs&amp;#34; of the learning ladder &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649503&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Schwartz&amp;#39;s experiment is the most revealing, and not for the reason he thinks. What he demonstrated is that Claude can, with detailed supervision, produce a technically rigorous physics paper. What he actually demonstrated, if you read carefully, is that the supervision is the physics. Claude produced a complete first draft in three days. It looked professional. The equations seemed right. The plots matched expectations. Then Schwartz read it, and it was wrong. Claude had been adjusting…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47648483&quot; title=&quot;Precisely. The first 10 rungs of the ladder will be removed, but we still expect you to be able to get to the roof. The AI won&amp;#39;t get you there and you won&amp;#39;t have the knowledge you&amp;#39;d normally gain on those first 10 rungs to help you move past #10.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Some professionals report a &amp;#34;mental cache&amp;#34; issue where using AI prevents them from truly internalizing code, leading to significant slowdowns when manual intervention is required &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47648892&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve just started a new role as a senior SWE after 5 months off. I&amp;#39;ve been using Claude a bit in my time off; it works really well. But now that I&amp;#39;ve started using it professionally, I keep running into a specific problem: I have nothing to hold onto in my own mind. How this plays out: I use Claude to write some moderately complex code and raise a PR. Someone asks me to change something. I look at the review and think, yeah, that makes sense, I missed that and Claude missed that. The code…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, some argue that the market will simply stop valuing these manual skills, viewing AI as a tool similar to the calculator that allows workers to focus on higher-level outputs rather than the mechanics&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/JuliusBrussee/caveman&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Caveman: Why use many token when few token do trick&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647455&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;740 points · 325 comments · by tosh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Caveman is a Claude Code skill that reduces AI token usage by approximately 75% by prompting the model to eliminate filler words and use &amp;#34;caveman-speak&amp;#34; while maintaining full technical accuracy. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/JuliusBrussee/caveman&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - JuliusBrussee/caveman: 🪨 why use many token when few token do trick — Claude Code skill that cuts 75% of tokens by talking like caveman    URL Source: https://github.com/JuliusBrussee/caveman    Markdown Content:  # GitHub - JuliusBrussee/caveman: 🪨 why use many token when few token do trick — Claude Code skill that cuts 75% of tokens by talking like caveman · GitHub    [Skip to content](https://github.com/JuliusBrussee/caveman#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether forcing an LLM to be concise—&amp;#34;caveman style&amp;#34;—degrades its performance, with many arguing that tokens serve as &amp;#34;units of thinking&amp;#34; where computation is tied to output length &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647907&quot; title=&quot;Oh boy. Someone didn&amp;#39;t get the memo that for LLMs, tokens are units of thinking . I.e. whatever feat of computation needs to happen to produce results you seek, it needs to fit in the tokens the LLM produces. Being a finite system, there&amp;#39;s only so much computation the LLM internal structure can do per token, so the more you force the model to be concise, the more difficult the task becomes for it - worst case, you can guarantee not to get a good answer because it requires more computation than…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47648041&quot; title=&quot;That was my first thought too -- instead of talk like a caveman you could turn off reasoning, with probably better results. Additionally, LLMs do not actually operate in text; much of the thinking happens in a much higher dimensional space that just happens to be decoded as text. So unless the LLM was trained otherwise, making it talk like a caveman is more than just theoretically turning it into a caveman.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users report that brevity leads to more misunderstandings and lower quality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647930&quot; title=&quot;Idk I try talk like cavemen to claude. Claude seems answer less good. We have more misunderstandings. Feel like sometimes need more words in total to explain previous instructions. Also less context is more damage if typo. Who agrees? Could be just feeling I have. I often ad fluff. Feels like better result from LLM. Me think LLM also get less thinking and less info from own previous replies if talk like caveman.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47648347&quot; title=&quot;LLMs don&amp;#39;t think at all. Forcing it to be concise doesn&amp;#39;t work because it wasn&amp;#39;t trained on token strings that short.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that filler words like &amp;#34;the&amp;#34; or polite preambles carry no useful signal and represent wasteful computation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650449&quot; title=&quot;Yeah but not all tokens are created equal. Some tokens are hard to predict and thus encode useful information; some are highly predictable and therefore don&amp;#39;t. Spending an entire forward pass through the token-generation machine just to generate a very low-entropy token like &amp;#39;is&amp;#39; is wasteful . The LLM doesn&amp;#39;t get to &amp;#39;remember&amp;#39; that thinking, it just gets to see a trivial grammar-filling token that a very dumb LLM could just as easily have made. They aren&amp;#39;t stenographically hiding useful…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47648266&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, I don&amp;#39;t think that &amp;#39;I&amp;#39;d be happy to help you with that&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;Sure, let me take a look at that for you&amp;#39; carries much useful signal that can be used for the next tokens.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The project&amp;#39;s author clarified that the tool is a humorous experiment aimed at reducing visible filler rather than hidden reasoning, though they acknowledged that rigorous benchmarks are still needed to prove technical accuracy is maintained &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650509&quot; title=&quot;Author here. A few people are arguing against a stronger claim than the repo is meant to make. As well, this was very much intended to be a joke and not research level commentary. This skill is not intended to reduce hidden reasoning / thinking tokens. Anthropic’s own docs suggest more thinking budget can improve performance, so I would not claim otherwise. What it targets is the visible completion: less preamble, less filler, less polished-but-nonessential text. Therefore, since…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47648171&quot; title=&quot;What do you mean? The page explicitly states: &amp;gt; cutting ~75% of tokens while keeping full technical accuracy. I have no clue if this claim holds, but alas, just pretending they did not address the obvious criticism, while they did, is at the very least pretty lazy. An explanation that explains nothing is not very interesting.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lalitm.com/post/building-syntaqlite-ai/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Eight years of wanting, three months of building with AI&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lalitm.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47648828&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;732 points · 221 comments · by brilee&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After eight years of procrastination, a developer used AI coding agents to build **syntaqlite**, a high-quality SQLite developer toolset, in just three months. While AI acted as a powerful &amp;#34;implementation multiplier&amp;#34; for tedious tasks, the author warns that over-reliance led to &amp;#34;spaghetti code&amp;#34; and required a complete architectural rewrite. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lalitm.com/post/building-syntaqlite-ai/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Eight years of wanting, three months of building with AI    URL Source: https://lalitm.com/post/building-syntaqlite-ai/    Published Time: 2026-04-05T13:00:00+01:00    Markdown Content:  For eight years, I’ve wanted a high-quality set of devtools for working with SQLite. Given how important SQLite is to the industry[1](https://lalitm.com/post/building-syntaqlite-ai/#sn-sqlite-industry), I’ve long been puzzled that no one has invested in building a really good developer experience for…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide between those who view AI as a tool for rapid prototyping that eventually requires rigorous human refactoring &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650080&quot; title=&quot;Refreshing to see an honest and balanced take on AI coding. This is what real AI-assisted coding looks like once you get past the initial wow factor of having the AI write code that executes and does what you asked. This experience is familiar to every serious software engineer who has used AI code gen and then reviewed the output: &amp;gt; But when I reviewed the codebase in detail in late January, the downside was obvious: the codebase was complete spaghetti14. I didn’t understand large parts of the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650978&quot; title=&quot;+1 I’ve been driving Claude as my primary coding interface the last three months at my job. Other than a different domain, I feel like I could have written this exact article. The project I’m on started as a vibe-coded prototype that quickly got promoted to a production service we sell. I’ve had to build the mental model after the fact, while refactoring and ripping out large chunks of nonsense or dead code. But the product wouldn’t exist without that quick and dirty prototype, and I can use…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; and those who believe &amp;#34;vibe-coding&amp;#34; will fundamentally democratize software by making traditional code quality irrelevant for smaller, single-user apps &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47651563&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ll take the other side of this. Professional software engineers like many of us have a big blind spot when it comes to AI coding, and that&amp;#39;s a fixation on code quality. It makes sense to focus on code quality. We&amp;#39;re not wrong. After all, we&amp;#39;ve spent our entire careers in the code. Bad code quality slows us down and makes things slow/insecure/unreliable/etc for end users. However, code quality is becoming less and less relevant in the age of AI coding, and to ignore that is to have our heads…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47651847&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; That&amp;#39;s still true, the only thing AI has changed is it&amp;#39;s let you charge further and further into technical debt before you see the problems. But now instead of the problems being a gradual ramp up it&amp;#39;s a cliff, the moment you hit the point where the current crop of models can&amp;#39;t operate on it effectively any more you&amp;#39;re completely lost. What you&amp;#39;re missing is that fewer and fewer projects are going to need a ton of technical depth. I have friends who&amp;#39;d never written a line of code in their…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that neglecting quality creates a &amp;#34;technical debt cliff&amp;#34; where AI-generated spaghetti code becomes impossible to maintain or fix once it reaches a certain complexity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47651792&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; However, code quality is becoming less and less relevant in the age of AI coding, and to ignore that is to have our heads stuck in the sand. Just because we don&amp;#39;t like it doesn&amp;#39;t mean it&amp;#39;s not true. It&amp;#39;s the opposite, code quality is becoming more and more relevant. Before now you could only neglect quality for so long before the time to implement any change became so long as to completely stall out a project. That&amp;#39;s still true, the only thing AI has changed is it&amp;#39;s let you charge further and…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47651658&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; However, code quality is becoming less and less relevant in the age of AI coding, and to ignore that is to have our heads stuck in the sand. Just because we don&amp;#39;t like it doesn&amp;#39;t mean it&amp;#39;s not true. Strong disagree. I just watched a team spend weeks trying to make a piece of code work with AI because the vibe coded was spaghetti garbage that even the AI couldn’t tell what needed to be done and was basically playing ineffective whackamole - it would fix the bug you ask it by reintroducing an…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47651957&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; What you&amp;#39;re missing is that fewer and fewer projects are going to need a ton of technical depth.  &amp;gt; I have friends who&amp;#39;d never written a line of code in their lives who now use multiple simple vibe-coded apps at work daily. Again it&amp;#39;s the opposite. A landscape of vibe coded micro apps is a landscape of buggy, vulnerable, points of failure. When you buy a product, software or hardware, you do more than buy the functionality you buy the assurance it will work. AI does not change this. Vibe code…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these disagreements, users report that while fully autonomous agents often fail, AI serves as a powerful &amp;#34;chainsaw&amp;#34; for cleaning up code when guided by an experienced developer &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650978&quot; title=&quot;+1 I’ve been driving Claude as my primary coding interface the last three months at my job. Other than a different domain, I feel like I could have written this exact article. The project I’m on started as a vibe-coded prototype that quickly got promoted to a production service we sell. I’ve had to build the mental model after the fact, while refactoring and ripping out large chunks of nonsense or dead code. But the product wouldn’t exist without that quick and dirty prototype, and I can use…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47651399&quot; title=&quot;Fwiw, the article mirrors my experience when I started out too, even exactly with the same first month of vibecoding, then the next project which I did exactly like he outlined too. Personally, I think it&amp;#39;s just the natural flow when you&amp;#39;re starting out. If he keeps going, his opinion is going to change and as he gets to know it better, he&amp;#39;ll likely go more and more towards vibecoding again. It&amp;#39;s hard to say why, but you get better at it. Even if it&amp;#39;s really hard to really put into words why&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/ce3d5gkd2geo&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Artemis II crew see first glimpse of far side of Moon [video]&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649721&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;459 points · 351 comments · by mooreds&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Artemis II crew, aboard the Orion spacecraft, has shared the first human-eyed views of the Moon&amp;#39;s far side, including a photograph of the Orientale basin. The four-person team is currently on the third day of their mission to orbit the Moon and return to Earth. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/ce3d5gkd2geo&quot; title=&quot;Title: &amp;#39;Absolutely spectacular&amp;#39;: Artemis II crew see first glimpse of far side of Moon    URL Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/ce3d5gkd2geo    Markdown Content:  # &amp;#39;Absolutely spectacular&amp;#39;: Artemis II crew see first glimpse of far side of Moon    [Skip to content](https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/ce3d5gkd2geo#main-content)    [Watch Live](https://www.bbc.com/watch-live-news/)    [](https://www.bbc.com/)    Subscribe    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users find the raw human reaction of seeing the lunar surface &amp;#34;hits different&amp;#34; despite decades of existing photography &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650322&quot; title=&quot;I like how most people&amp;#39;s reactions at this point are &amp;#39;yeah, whatever&amp;#39;, as if it&amp;#39;s every day that humans observe the far side of the moon with a naked eye through a window :). We do know what it looks like and we have photos from the surface, yes, but seeing the reaction from real people who&amp;#39;re actually there does hit different, at least for me&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue the achievement is overshadowed by the use of aging technology and &amp;#34;pork&amp;#34; spending &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650990&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not being a hater, but we landed on the moon 55+ years ago and now we&amp;#39;re doing a flyby with 35+ year-old engine tech.  It&amp;#39;s good that we&amp;#39;re doing something but we should be doing better.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650804&quot; title=&quot;Speaking for myself (who has been fascinated with the space program since I was a small child), any joy I might feel around Artemis II feels tainted, by the immense amount of pork involved (SLS is called &amp;#39;Senate Launch System&amp;#39; for good reason) to the point where Artemis is more corporate welfare that happens to involve the Moon than a real space program, and by my belief that it is intended to be little more than a quick, dirty, and vainglorious Apollo repeat by a failing government.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant debate exists regarding the mission&amp;#39;s social relevance, with commenters citing economic hardship and historical critiques of space program costs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650557&quot; title=&quot;it&amp;#39;s amazing, but I&amp;#39;ll refer you to Gil Scott-Heron for my feelings on the matter A rat done bit my sister Nell    With whitey on the moon    Her face and arms began to swell    And whitey&amp;#39;s on the moon    I can&amp;#39;t pay no doctor bills    But whitey&amp;#39;s on the moon    Ten years from now I&amp;#39;ll be payin&amp;#39; still    While whitey&amp;#39;s on the moon    The man just upped my rent last night    Cause whitey&amp;#39;s on the moon    No hot water, no toilets, no lights    But whitey&amp;#39;s on the moon    I wonder why he&amp;#39;s upping me?   …&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650472&quot; title=&quot;People are struggling to afford every day life and we are surrounding by crazy things every day like cellphones talking to satellites in space. On any objective measure it is definitely amazing to send humans to the moon, but there are more pressing issues for most people right now. If we as a species had more of our ducks in a row we may be able to better celebrate this as the achievement for humankind that it is.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, while others lament that such a technical milestone has become a magnet for political bickering &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47652278&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s pretty depressing that on a corner of the internet that&amp;#39;s supposed to be a gathering of tech/geeks/nerds/stem people, discussing topics that &amp;#39;good hackers would find interesting&amp;#39;, it&amp;#39;s seemingly impossible to have a single thread about something like this that isn&amp;#39;t almost entirely negative or political bickering.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a minor dispute over the cultural framing of the event, ranging from a desire for poetic or spiritual readings to concerns that religious associations would reinforce global divisions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47651007&quot; title=&quot;On one of Apollo missions they&amp;#39;ve read from Bible, Book of Genesis [1]. I wish they did something like that here - and I&amp;#39;m not even a Christian, let alone religious. They did relay some beautiful message [2] though. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4tDZye57D4 [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELslc6O4UVk&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47651101&quot; title=&quot;I sure hope they don&amp;#39;t. Even just the hint of connecting this achievement to the supposed Christian nature of the US would reinforce a lot of the bad things in the world right now. Namely, that we&amp;#39;re actively at war in the middle east (Christianity and Judaism vs Islam), in a burgeoning cold war with China (more Christianity vs &amp;#39;godless&amp;#39; communists), and run by an increasingly fascistic administration (the ties between religion and government are a hallmark of fascism).&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://apps.apple.com/nl/app/google-ai-edge-gallery/id6749645337&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Gemma 4 on iPhone&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (apps.apple.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47652561&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;538 points · 140 comments · by janandonly&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google has released the AI Edge Gallery app for iPhone, allowing users to run the new Gemma 4 open-source model family and other LLMs fully offline for private, high-performance on-device reasoning. &lt;a href=&quot;https://apps.apple.com/nl/app/google-ai-edge-gallery/id6749645337&quot; title=&quot;Title: Google AI Edge Gallery-app - App Store    URL Source: https://apps.apple.com/nl/app/google-ai-edge-gallery/id6749645337    Markdown Content:  # ‎Google AI Edge Gallery-app - App Store    voor iPhone  *   [iPhone](https://apps.apple.com/nl/iphone/today)  *   [iPad](https://apps.apple.com/nl/ipad/today)  *   [Mac](https://apps.apple.com/nl/mac/discover)  *   [Watch](https://apps.apple.com/nl/watch/apps-and-games)  *   [TV](https://apps.apple.com/nl/tv/discover)    Zoek     *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The arrival of Gemma 4 on iPhone has sparked excitement for a future of &amp;#34;almost free&amp;#34; local AI that integrates with mobile actions like controlling flashlights or maps &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653629&quot; title=&quot;OP Here. It is my firm belief that the only realistic use of AI in the future is either locally on-device for almost free, or in the cloud but way more expensive then it is today. The latter option will only bemusedly for tasks that humans are more expensive or much slower in. This Gemma 4 model gives me hope for a future Siri or other with iPhone and macOS integration, “Her” (as in the movie) style.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653053&quot; title=&quot;Impressive model, for sure. I&amp;#39;ve been running it on my Mac, now I get to have it locally in my iPhone? I need to test this. Wait, it does agent skills and mobile actions, all local to the phone? Whaaaat? (Have to check out later! Anyone have any tips yet?) I don&amp;#39;t normally do the whole &amp;#39;abliterated&amp;#39; thing (dealignment) but after discovering https://github.com/p-e-w/heretic , I was too tempted to try it with this model a couple days ago (made a repo to make it easier, actually)…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653080&quot; title=&quot;This is awesome! 1) I am able to run the model on my iPhone and get good results. Not as good as Gemini in the cloud, but good. 2) I love the “mobile actions” tool calls that allow the LLM to turn on the flashlight, open maps, etc. It would be fun if they added Siri Shortcuts support. I want the personal automation that Apple promised but never delivered. 3) I am so excited for local models to be normalized. I build little apps for teachers and there are stringent privacy laws involved that…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users are impressed by the model&amp;#39;s ability to handle &amp;#34;dealigned&amp;#34; or uncensored conversations through &amp;#34;abliteration&amp;#34; techniques &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653053&quot; title=&quot;Impressive model, for sure. I&amp;#39;ve been running it on my Mac, now I get to have it locally in my iPhone? I need to test this. Wait, it does agent skills and mobile actions, all local to the phone? Whaaaat? (Have to check out later! Anyone have any tips yet?) I don&amp;#39;t normally do the whole &amp;#39;abliterated&amp;#39; thing (dealignment) but after discovering https://github.com/p-e-w/heretic , I was too tempted to try it with this model a couple days ago (made a repo to make it easier, actually)…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653459&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; And there&amp;#39;s a whole set of ethically-justifiable but rule-flagging conversations (loosely categorizable as things like &amp;#39;sensitive&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;ethically-borderline-but-productive&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;violating sacred cows&amp;#39;) that are now possible with this, and at a level never before possible until now. I checked the abliterate script and I don&amp;#39;t yet understand what it does or what the result is. What are the conversations this enables?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others remain skeptical of the &amp;#34;Her&amp;#34;-style future it promises or find the model&amp;#39;s coding performance inferior to competitors like Qwen &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653687&quot; title=&quot;Did you really watch “Her” and think this is a future that should happen?? Seriously????&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47654059&quot; title=&quot;Having Scarlett Johansson&amp;#39;s voice might not be so bad or even something less robotic.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653875&quot; title=&quot;I tried it on my mac, for coding, and I wasn&amp;#39;t really impressed compared to Qwen. I guess there are things it&amp;#39;s better at?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Debate persists regarding the economic viability of local versus cloud inference, with some arguing that dedicated cloud hardware will always be more energy-efficient than draining phone batteries &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653812&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; or in the cloud but way more expensive then it is today. Why? It&amp;#39;s widely understood that the big players are making profit on inference. The only reason they still have losses is because training is so expensive, but you need to do that no matter whether the models are running in the cloud or on your device. If you think about it, it&amp;#39;s always going to be cheaper and more energy-efficient to have dedicated cloud hardware to run models. Running them on your phone, even if possible, is just…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sschueller.github.io/posts/the-free-market-lie/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why Switzerland has 25 Gbit internet and America doesn&amp;#39;t&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sschueller.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47652400&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;359 points · 273 comments · by sschueller&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Switzerland achieves world-leading 25 Gbit internet speeds by regulating fiber as a neutral, open-access utility with dedicated lines for every home, whereas the U.S. and Germany suffer from slower speeds and higher prices due to territorial monopolies and inefficient infrastructure competition. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sschueller.github.io/posts/the-free-market-lie/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Free Market Lie: Why Switzerland Has 25 Gbit Internet and America Doesn&amp;#39;t    URL Source: https://sschueller.github.io/posts/the-free-market-lie/    Published Time: 2026-04-03T10:30:16+02:00    Markdown Content:  # The Free Market Lie: Why Switzerland Has 25 Gbit Internet and America Doesn&amp;#39;t - Stefan Schüller    [Stefan Schüller](https://sschueller.github.io/ &amp;#39;Stefan Schüller&amp;#39;)    [Stefan Schüller](https://sschueller.github.io/ &amp;#39;Stefan Schüller&amp;#39;)    ## Contents    *   [The…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide between those who view Switzerland’s superior infrastructure as a replicable model of rational governance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47654607&quot; title=&quot;I have a gentle rule, which is when discussing (geo)politics with friends, we should try not to use Switzerland as an example.  It&amp;#39;s just too good, too rational, too sensible, too well run, in myriad ways that other countries should be able to emulate, but consistently and constantly don&amp;#39;t.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47654651&quot; title=&quot;I have a gentle rule, which is &amp;#39;if you can do it in one place, it is probably possible to do it in a second&amp;#39;. The Swiss are not a separate species.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt; and those who argue its small scale and unique conditions make it an outlier &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47654664&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s also too tiny to be representative of most of humanity&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47654717&quot; title=&quot;So one would think. And yet, living in Switzerland after the UK involved one after another discovery of how well-ordered and -run a country could be.  And then moving to Germany was like stepping back even further behind my memories of the UK. I&amp;#39;m sure you could find examples of countries that do specific things as well as Switzerland; but I&amp;#39;m not aware of many places that do almost everything so excellently.  (Maybe Japan, in many respects, but I lack sufficient direct experience to adequately…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. A central anecdote illustrates that even the mere threat of competition can force monopolies to upgrade infrastructure, though commenters disagree on whether this proves the efficacy of the free market or its inherent failure to provide services without external pressure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47652556&quot; title=&quot;In my small island community, I participated in a municipal committee whose mandate was to bring proper broadband to the island. Although two telecom duopolies already served the community, one of them had undersea fiber but zero fiber to the home (DSL remains the only option), whereas the other used a 670 Mbps wireless microwave link for backhaul and delivery via coaxial cable. And pricing? Insanely expensive for either terrible option. Our little committee investigated all manner of options,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653124&quot; title=&quot;No it doesn&amp;#39;t, and you just proved it. You managed it because you could fake you had leverage. But without that you were slaves of theses companies, and that&amp;#39;s the general rule.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47654504&quot; title=&quot;Sometimes I wonder if whoever writes these comments understands the words their using. &amp;gt; No it doesn&amp;#39;t, and you just proved it What exactly did they prove? You didn&amp;#39;t substantiate or explain this at all. Leverage would be relevant if they were negotiating a deal. They weren&amp;#39;t. The company laid down fibre because of what they saw as a potential competitor (municipal fibre). The municipality didn&amp;#39;t use the threat of fibre to come to terms with the monopolistic company. That would&amp;#39;ve been…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47655345&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; What exactly did they prove? They proved that the Free Market doesn&amp;#39;t automatically provide functional competition, if you think about it, the Western-style free market is very keen on creating and maintaining monopolies, even cheating isn&amp;#39;t going to help you here. &amp;gt; The company laid down fibre because of what they saw as a potential competitor (municipal fibre). The OP is about free market failures, not about competition. As another example, many  people have pointed out that there is much…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some question the practical necessity of ultra-high speeds for average households, others maintain that such advancements are achievable elsewhere if the political will exists &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47654651&quot; title=&quot;I have a gentle rule, which is &amp;#39;if you can do it in one place, it is probably possible to do it in a second&amp;#39;. The Swiss are not a separate species.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47656482&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand the desire (fetish?) for high speed home Internet connections at home. I have 25 Mbps up. 10 Mbps down. Have had it for years. It&amp;#39;s fine. It&amp;#39;s fine when both my wife and I are working from home and doing calls. It&amp;#39;s fine for software development. It&amp;#39;s fine for email and web browsing, and everything other than downloading maddeningly large files, 99% of which shouldn&amp;#39;t be that large anyway. It&amp;#39;s fine for watching streaming shows. Maybe if our kids turn out to be YouTube…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47654887&quot; title=&quot;Switzerland has a population larger than all but ~11 US states.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23328940.2026.2645467#abstract&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Finnish sauna heat exposure induces stronger immune cell than cytokine responses&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tandfonline.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649113&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;351 points · 229 comments · by Growtika&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23328940.2026.2645467#abstract&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The study&amp;#39;s methodology sparked debate regarding the intensity and duration of the heat exposure, with some users noting that 30 minutes at 73°C is significantly hotter and longer than typical commercial sauna experiences outside of Finland &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650983&quot; title=&quot;There’s a saying in Finland that foreign &amp;#39;saunas&amp;#39; are not true saunas at all, but rather just &amp;#39;untypically warm rooms&amp;#39;. The experiments where at 73°C which is a lot hotter than most gym/hotel/spa saunas I’ve been in outside Finland&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649800&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;  A total of 51 adults (...) were exposed to a 30-minute session of acute FSB at a temperature of + 73°C Woah, that seems like a lot for me. I can usually stand maybe 60ºC for like 10 maybe 15 min. I don&amp;#39;t think I&amp;#39;d be able to stand 30 min under 73ºC.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters disagreed on whether the health benefits stem from the physiological heat response or the socioeconomic luxury of having dedicated leisure time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649852&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;mitigate the adverse effects of low socioeconomic status Makes me wonder how much of it is Sauna, vs just the luxury of having the time to go do nothing for ~30 minutes.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650374&quot; title=&quot;People with high socioeconomic status work much more and have less free time. It’s absurd to claim otherwise. EDIT: please before being outraged at my comment have a look at actual evidence, e.g. Time and income poverty by Tania Burchardt; bottom decile compared with top decile has 12 hours more free time a week!&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649981&quot; title=&quot;I just cannot fathom comments like this. I’m preeetty sure that the vast majority of people spend half an hour a day doing nothing, in front of a screen of some type. How many people do you think there are there who don’t have thirty minutes of leisure time once per week?!&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, participants discussed the cultural context of Finnish wellness, including traditional remedies like medicinal tar and the skepticism toward &amp;#34;untypically warm&amp;#34; foreign saunas &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649827&quot; title=&quot;In Finland we have old saying: &amp;#39;If liquor, tar and sauna won’t help, an illness is fatal&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650983&quot; title=&quot;There’s a saying in Finland that foreign &amp;#39;saunas&amp;#39; are not true saunas at all, but rather just &amp;#39;untypically warm rooms&amp;#39;. The experiments where at 73°C which is a lot hotter than most gym/hotel/spa saunas I’ve been in outside Finland&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649919&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Tar, acclaimed to have been formed from the sweat of Väinämöinen, a central character from the Finnish national epic Kalevala, was an important medicament to the former-day Finns. Tar actually did bear antiseptic features, which worked as a cure for infections. Lately tar has been recognised to include parts that can cause cancer, and the European Union has urged that its use should be avoided.&amp;#39; [1] I personally dont know how tar was used for health, but it was big export item of Finland…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://zencapital.substack.com/p/sad-story-of-my-google-workspace&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;My Google Workspace account suspension&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (zencapital.substack.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47648404&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;342 points · 197 comments · by zenincognito&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A business owner’s Google Workspace account was suspended for 40 hours after they removed a recovery phone number while traveling, triggering security flags that blocked access to critical business operations, payroll, and third-party services despite the user having multiple alternative authentication methods. &lt;a href=&quot;https://zencapital.substack.com/p/sad-story-of-my-google-workspace&quot; title=&quot;Title: Sad Story Of My Google Workspace account suspension    URL Source: https://zencapital.substack.com/p/sad-story-of-my-google-workspace    Published Time: 2026-04-05T11:47:09+00:00    Markdown Content:  As the title suggests, I have finally become the victim of Google’s account suspension. The reason given over the phone was that my account had been “hijacked” - when in reality, I was simply the one accessing it from overseas.    Despite repeatedly explaining this, they ignored my assertions and…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The consensus among commenters is that Google’s customer support has deteriorated from a high-touch service model &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649377&quot; title=&quot;Once upon a time at Google: The year was 2013, and I&amp;#39;d been selected to be among the first 8,000 people to get Google Glass. I had to go to Google HQ in NYC from my home in Virginia to get it and be instructed 1:1 on how to use it. I was given a toll-free phone number to call for support by a Glass expert, available 24/7/365. Not only did they answer immediately whenever I had even the smallest problem or question: I twice broke my Glass, and each time I&amp;#39;d call the support number to ask for a…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; to a &amp;#34;hostile&amp;#34; system of automated bots and unhelpful forum volunteers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649270&quot; title=&quot;I think Google has done some cool stuff, and I think in a lot of ways they&amp;#39;re, at least historically, one of the less evil big tech players. I gotta say, though, that my experience with trying to get them to sort out any kind of issue with their services makes me reluctant to spend any money with them. I bought a Pixel phone. As per the sales terms, the phone came with one year of Gemini AI Pro service. Except, the redemption process to get the year of service didn&amp;#39;t work for me. I contacted…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650362&quot; title=&quot;I agree with your sentiment, but I wanted to call out that they&amp;#39;ve always been just as evil as other big tech companies. I think their motto of &amp;#39;don&amp;#39;t be evil&amp;#39; was some pretty clever PR. I started questioning it c. 2008 when they ghosted me on resolving an issue with my blogspot site that was a bug in the platform. All I could get was a condescending non-response from a &amp;#39;diamond&amp;#39; volunteer on a forum. They were apparently the gatekeepers to reaching actual support.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649808&quot; title=&quot;Google needs to understand that watching this nightmare scenario play out over and over again is actively destroying trust in their platform. When your email, authentication, documents, payroll, and CRM all flow through a single provider and that provider can lock you out overnight with no meaningful recourse, you’ve invited customers to place their entire digital presence into a house of cards. The fact that this same story surfaces almost daily should be a wake up call to existing and…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Users warn that relying on a single provider for identity and storage creates a dangerous single point of failure, advising against &amp;#34;Login with Google&amp;#34; options and urging others to maintain disaster recovery plans &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650713&quot; title=&quot;If a service offers &amp;#39;Login with Google/Apple/Facebook/etc&amp;#39; you should never do that if they offer a username/password. It just increases the single point of failure. Avoid places that only offer the &amp;#39;Login with Foo&amp;#39; if at all possible (looking at you Tailscale). As an ex-googler, the only reason I was comfortable keeping even my personal email there was because I could reach out internally if there was a problem. I left Google, and left gmail behind too.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650408&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s been [0] days since the last &amp;#39;Cloud provider banned me and I lost everything&amp;#39; article. Everyone who depends on the good graces of a cloud provider for something (not just Google, but Amazon, Microsoft, Apple, whatever) needs to at the very least, take a moment, and figure out what their plan is when they are suddenly banned and locked out permanently, without any way to contact the company. Does life just go on, since you don&amp;#39;t have anything important hosted there? (Best Case) Do you lose…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650773&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Avoid places that only offer the &amp;#39;Login with Foo&amp;#39; if at all possible (looking at you Tailscale). Tailscale is the only serious company that I can ever recall offering /only/ third party login. It&amp;#39;s bit bizarre on the face of it. Anyone know the reason?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong call for legislative action or public oversight to hold megacorps accountable for &amp;#34;holding hostage&amp;#34; essential digital services like email and authentication &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47648763&quot; title=&quot;This should be illegal. Megacorps eat more and more of our life and regular people are increasingly at mercy of these hostile entities. They should be pushed more against. If we can&amp;#39;t have proper anti monopoly splits like AT&amp;amp;T, then at least ways to prevent them exerting too much power are long due. If you provide an essential service, responsibility should match that.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47648902&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Despite repeatedly explaining this, they ignored my assertions and continue to hold my email hostage.&amp;#39; Well, you have become the product here. That also happens by other &amp;#39;free&amp;#39; email providers too. I had this happen to me on inbox.lt; the guy demanded I use a smartphone to &amp;#39;prove&amp;#39; my identity. At that point I realised they want to connect this data to the account and sell it to others who are interested in that.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649069&quot; title=&quot;Yes, there needs to be a government public service counter where you can go with all your BigTech issues and complaints.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-7.0-AWS-PostgreSQL-Drop&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AWS engineer reports PostgreSQL perf halved by Linux 7.0, fix may not be easy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (phoronix.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47644864&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;392 points · 142 comments · by crcastle&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An AWS engineer discovered that changes in the upcoming Linux 7.0 kernel can reduce PostgreSQL performance by up to 50%, a regression caused by architectural shifts in task scheduling that may require complex fixes. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-7.0-AWS-PostgreSQL-Drop&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;lore.kernel.org&amp;amp;#x2F;lkml&amp;amp;#x2F;yr3inlzesdb45n6i6lpbimwr7b25kqkn37qzlvvzgad5hfd7ut@xv4cihno76wu&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;lore.kernel.org&amp;amp;#x2F;lkml&amp;amp;#x2F;yr3inlzesdb45n6i6lpbimwr7b25kqk...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A significant performance regression in Linux 7.0 has been identified that can halve PostgreSQL performance on high-core ARM64 machines, though it appears currently unreproducible on x86_64 hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645543&quot; title=&quot;AIUI in that thread they&amp;#39;re saying &amp;#39;0.51x&amp;#39; the perf on a 96-core arm64 machine and they&amp;#39;re also saying they cannot reproduce it on a 96-core amd64 machine. So it&amp;#39;s not going to affect everybody both running PostgreSQL and upgrading to the latest kernel. Conditions seems to be: arm64, shitloads of core, kernel 7.0, current version of PostgreSQL. That is not going to be 100% of the installed PostgreSQL DBs out there in the wild when 7.0 lands in a few weeks.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645863&quot; title=&quot;So perhaps this is a regression specifically in the arm64 code, or said differently maybe it’s a performance bug that has been there for a long time but covered up by the scheduler part that was removed?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that production database users typically avoid bleeding-edge kernels, others point out that this version will power upcoming releases like Ubuntu 26.04 LTS, which is widely used in major backend environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645053&quot; title=&quot;Nobody sensible runs the latest kernel; nobody running PG in production should be afraid of setting a non-default at either boot time or as a sysctl. So this will, most likely, be another step in building a PG database server (turn off pre-emption if your kernel is 7.0 or later and PG is pre-whatever-version). At worst it might become a permanent part of building a PG server and a FAQ... but if it affects one thing this badly, it will affect others.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645288&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Nobody sensible runs the latest kernel From the article: &amp;#39;Linux 7.0 stable is due out in about two weeks. This is also the kernel version powering Ubuntu 26.04 LTS to be released later in April.&amp;#39; Unfortunately, lots of people will be running it in less than a month. At the moment, it&amp;#39;ll take a kernel patch (not a sysctl) to undo this-- hopefully something changes.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645682&quot; title=&quot;Ubuntu is used in many serious backend environments. Heroku runs tens of thousands (if not more) instances of Ubuntu on its fleet. Or at least it did through the teens and early 2020s. https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/stack&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The issue stems from changes to kernel preemption, leading to debates over whether the fix requires a kernel patch or if PostgreSQL should move away from using userspace spinlocks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47644993&quot; title=&quot;Its worth reading this follow-up LKML post by Andres Freund (who works on Postgres): https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/yr3inlzesdb45n6i6lpbimwr7b25kqk...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645288&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Nobody sensible runs the latest kernel From the article: &amp;#39;Linux 7.0 stable is due out in about two weeks. This is also the kernel version powering Ubuntu 26.04 LTS to be released later in April.&amp;#39; Unfortunately, lots of people will be running it in less than a month. At the moment, it&amp;#39;ll take a kernel patch (not a sysctl) to undo this-- hopefully something changes.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645527&quot; title=&quot;I feel like using spinlocks in user space at all without kernel support like rseq is just asking for weird performance degradations.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jsnover.com/blog/2026/03/13/microsoft-hasnt-had-a-coherent-gui-strategy-since-petzold/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft hasn&amp;#39;t had a coherent GUI strategy since Petzold&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jsnover.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47651703&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;332 points · 188 comments · by naves&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Former Microsoft executive Jeffrey Snover argues that the company has lacked a unified and coherent graphical user interface strategy since the era of Charles Petzold&amp;#39;s foundational Windows programming guidance. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jsnover.com/blog/2026/03/13/microsoft-hasnt-had-a-coherent-gui-strategy-since-petzold/&quot; title=&quot;See also &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;x.com&amp;amp;#x2F;stevesi&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2036921223150440542&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;x.com&amp;amp;#x2F;stevesi&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2036921223150440542&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;stevesi&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2036921223150440542&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;stevesi&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2036921223150440542&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;)&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft’s GUI strategy is characterized by a &amp;#34;constant stream of rug-pulls&amp;#34; and a lack of commitment to any framework post-Win32, leading many developers to abandon the platform for web-based alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653811&quot; title=&quot;The problem is that they just could not commit to anything for more than 2 years after Win32. They had something reasonably good in WinRT. They should have stuck to that. But Nadella came in, said Azure Cloud is the future and abandoned the Windows platform.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653508&quot; title=&quot;Having spent some time kicking around the Delphi space I got quite into WPF in 2007ish.  By 2010 I had not just sworn off it, I&amp;#39;d sworn off Windows entirely. The constant stream of rug-pulls as one bit of MS managed to pull off a political heist over another and - oh no - yet another &amp;#39;latest and greatest&amp;#39; technology was effectively deprecated within 18 months of launch, invalidating all the effort you put in to staying up to date just became a pointless treadmill. Fortunately Rails was taking…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that HTML and PWAs now provide a sufficiently performant, cross-platform standard for modern UI development &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47652219&quot; title=&quot;The churn would have been much worse if Microsoft was rolling out successful GUI framework after GUI framework.  As it is you can still write a Win32 app if that pleases you, or still write .NET (and damn that runtime download!) Microsoft has bought into ‘make a web app’ since 1988, they introduced AJAX, they got flexbox and grid into CSS and numerous HTML 5 features to support application UIs.  They ‘frikin bought npm! . I use Windows every day but I almost exclusively develop cross-platform…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47655939&quot; title=&quot;The UI strategy of the future may very well be HTML. It&amp;#39;s widespread, standardized, sufficiently performant, and pretty rich. What&amp;#39;s still missing is deeper integration with native OS concepts and programming languages other than JS. Frameworks like Electron are a step in that direction but they come with notable drawbacks. Applications often struggle with things that should feel natural like managing multiple OS-level windows. Another PITA: Electron apps repeatedly bundle large portions of…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47654932&quot; title=&quot;Your post is touching on a key question: why write a Windows-specific app? I&amp;#39;m a developer who has built and published several apps. I want the biggest possible audience for those apps. Why would I limit those apps to Windows? (Or even to any single platform/OS?) Web apps work everywhere. The web has grown increasingly powerful and capable. Why would I invest in a technology that can only run on a single OS? Doesn&amp;#39;t make sense. Just build for the web. You can package web apps for all the major…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that Microsoft’s shift toward Azure and cloud services has left Windows without a coherent vision or identity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47654923&quot; title=&quot;At this point one must ask if Microsoft is still a software platform company - whether their products form a substrate where an ecosystem can form and build a coherent software environment for the users of their platform. Microsoft used to be the Windows company (after being the BASIC company, then the DOS company). Then it became the Office company. Now it’s SharePoint and Office365 and Azure, a utility. Windows is a relatively small part. Office is both desktop and web (and spacecraft, where…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47655207&quot; title=&quot;Nadella thought he could take the reins and start yelling “Cloud! Cloud! Cloud!” and that would be successful. He doesn’t have a strategy and now that’s becoming apparent.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Historical attempts at innovation, such as WPF, are remembered by some as bloated and overly reliant on high-end graphics hardware for simple text-based tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47656224&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; WPF was good As someone who saw what impact WPF had on average users running average hardware in the late 2000s to early 2010s, I disagree. In 2011, my brother was in seminary, using an average Windows Vista-era laptop that he had been given in 2008. When he was home for Christmas in 2011, we were talking about his laptop, and he told me that the Logos Bible software ran sluggishly on that laptop. He said something about how, for reasons unknown to him, the current version of Logos required…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2026/04/someone-at-browserstack-is-leaking-users-email-address/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Someone at BrowserStack is leaking users&amp;#39; email addresses&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (shkspr.mobi)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649117&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;369 points · 99 comments · by m_km&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A BrowserStack user discovered their unique, service-specific email address was leaked to the marketing platform Apollo.io, which identified BrowserStack as the source of the data. &lt;a href=&quot;https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2026/04/someone-at-browserstack-is-leaking-users-email-address/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Someone at BrowserStack is Leaking Users&amp;#39; Email Address    URL Source: https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2026/04/someone-at-browserstack-is-leaking-users-email-address/    Published Time: 2026-04-05T12:34:03+01:00    Markdown Content:  # Someone at BrowserStack is Leaking Users’ Email Address – Terence Eden’s Blog  [![Image 1: Terence Eden. He has a beard and is smiling.](https://shkspr.mobi/apple-touch-icon.png)](https://shkspr.mobi/blog)[Terence Eden’s Blog](https://shkspr.mobi/blog)[![Image 2:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The consensus among commenters is that the leak likely stems from BrowserStack’s use of Apollo.io, a sales platform that &amp;#34;enriches&amp;#34; user data by sharing it across its entire customer base &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649672&quot; title=&quot;Everyone in this thread suggesting a “data leak” or “compromise” is totally missing the fact that this is how Apollo works. This is often times overlooked by Apollo customers themselves. You have to opt out of customer data sharing (and in doing so lose out on the value of the product): https://knowledge.apollo.io/hc/en-us/articles/20727684184589... Not commenting on whether this is good or ethical (or even totally legal), but this is what is happening behind the scenes.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650102&quot; title=&quot;For a little more color for people unfamiliar with modern sales/marketing: 1. A user signs up to BrowserStack 2. BrowserStack (automatically) upload the submitted user’s information to Apollo 3. Apollo “enrich” the user’s details using information they already have about the person, e.g: company revenue, LinkedIn profile 4. Sales reps at BrowserStack use the enriched information to identify leads, bucket for marketing etc. Apollo’s customer data sharing adds any information BrowserStack send to…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest a traditional database compromise or intentional data sale &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649448&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; BrowserStack routinely sell or give away their users&amp;#39; data. &amp;gt; A third-party service used by BrowserStack siphons off information to send to others. &amp;gt; An employee or contractor at BrowserStack is exfiltrating user data and transferring it elsewhere. Or the simpler answer, their db/email list has been compromised.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649647&quot; title=&quot;The simplest answer is they are voluntarily being scum and selling user data to make a quick buck. It’s almost universally true.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue it is more likely a result of modern marketing workflows where sales teams upload customer lists to CRMs without fully grasping the privacy implications &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649685&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;After a brief discussion, the emailer told me they got my details from Apollo.io The landing page for Apollo.io says it&amp;#39;s a &amp;#39;AI sales platform&amp;#39;. In other words, a CRM. My guess is that someone on the sales team uploaded the entire customer list for sales purposes, not realizing the privacy implications.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650102&quot; title=&quot;For a little more color for people unfamiliar with modern sales/marketing: 1. A user signs up to BrowserStack 2. BrowserStack (automatically) upload the submitted user’s information to Apollo 3. Apollo “enrich” the user’s details using information they already have about the person, e.g: company revenue, LinkedIn profile 4. Sales reps at BrowserStack use the enriched information to identify leads, bucket for marketing etc. Apollo’s customer data sharing adds any information BrowserStack send to…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649796&quot; title=&quot;Linkedin got users to unwittingly to share their entire contact list by signing into gmail. What makes you think something similar wouldn&amp;#39;t happen to some non-technical person on the sales team?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. This incident highlights the effectiveness of using unique, domain-specific email aliases to identify exactly which services have exposed or shared user information &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649709&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Like all good nerds, I generate a unique email address for every service I sign up to. This has several advantages - it allows me to see if a message is legitimately from a service, if a service is hacked the hackers can&amp;#39;t go credential stuffing, and I instantly know who leaked my address. I think a lot of services will &amp;#39;de-alias&amp;#39; the email addresses from these tricks to prevent alts, account spam, and to still target the &amp;#39;real&amp;#39; account holder email.  So the old tricks like &amp;#39; + @ &amp;#39; is not…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649779&quot; title=&quot;The way that this is done these days (and likely what the author did/does) is that you use a custom domain to receive mail; you provide an email like service@custom.com, and that way when service@ starts receiving spam you know exactly where it comes from&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lisette.run/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Lisette a little language inspired by Rust that compiles to Go&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lisette.run)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47646843&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;257 points · 135 comments · by jspdown&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lisette is a new programming language that combines Rust-inspired syntax and safety features—such as algebraic data types, pattern matching, and immutability—with the ability to compile directly into Go for seamless interoperability with the Go ecosystem. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lisette.run/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Lisette — Rust syntax, Go runtime    URL Source: https://lisette.run/    Published Time: Sat, 04 Apr 2026 12:30:15 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Lisette — Rust syntax, Go runtime    # Lisette    a little language    inspired by Rust    that compiles to Go    Algebraic data types · Pattern matching · No nil ·      Hindley-Milner type system · Immutable by default     Interoperability with Go&amp;#39;s ecosystem    &amp;gt; cargo install lisette    [](https://github.com/ivov/lisette)    import &amp;#39;go:fmt&amp;#39;  import &amp;#39;go:io&amp;#39;  import…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lisette is viewed as a promising attempt to combine Rust’s correctness with the ergonomics of a garbage-collected runtime like Go &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47648345&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve chatted a bit with the author, but not actually tried the language. It looks very interesting, and a clear improvement. I&amp;#39;m not particularly quiet about not liking Go[1]. I do think there may be a limit to how far it can be improved, though. Like typed nil means that a variable of an interface type (say coming from pure Go code) should enter Lisette as Option &amp;gt;. Sure, one can match on Some(Some(h)) to not require two unwrapping steps, but it becomes a bit awkward anyway. (note: this…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647335&quot; title=&quot;In my experience, what&amp;#39;s actually nice is the correctness. The low-levelness is not helpful for most of the software I write, and imposes a constant burden. Rust, of course superbly achieves its goals within its niche! But it is a niche, is my meaning here. What I actually want is code that&amp;#39;s correct, but ergonomic to write. So my ideal language (as strange as it sounds) would be Rust with a GC. I don&amp;#39;t want to worry about what string type I&amp;#39;m using. I want it to just work. But I want it to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users question the utility of a &amp;#34;Rust-like&amp;#34; language that lacks Rust&amp;#39;s low-level control &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647297&quot; title=&quot;For &amp;#39;classic&amp;#39; Rust what&amp;#39;s actually nice is that no runtime is needed, so this looks like a step backwards. What would be actually nice is running async Rust on the Go green threads runtime.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647554&quot; title=&quot;Looks great. But I can&amp;#39;t help wondering: If it is similar to Rust why not make it the the same as Rust where it feature-matches? Why import &amp;#39;foo.bar&amp;#39; instead of use foo::bar? Why Bar.Baz =&amp;gt; instead of Bar::Baz =&amp;gt;? What are you achieving here? Why make it subtlety different so someone who knows Rust has to learn yet another language? And someone who doesn&amp;#39;t know Rust learns a language that is different enough that the knowledge doesn&amp;#39;t transfer to writing Rust 1:1/naturally? Also: int but…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that a GC-backed language allows for faster development while avoiding Go&amp;#39;s specific design flaws, such as &amp;#34;typed nil&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47648345&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve chatted a bit with the author, but not actually tried the language. It looks very interesting, and a clear improvement. I&amp;#39;m not particularly quiet about not liking Go[1]. I do think there may be a limit to how far it can be improved, though. Like typed nil means that a variable of an interface type (say coming from pure Go code) should enter Lisette as Option &amp;gt;. Sure, one can match on Some(Some(h)) to not require two unwrapping steps, but it becomes a bit awkward anyway. (note: this…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649334&quot; title=&quot;From your blog entry: &amp;gt; Go was not satisfied with one billion dollar mistake, so they decided to have two flavors of NULL Thanks for raising this kind of things in such a comprehensible way. Now what I don&amp;#39;t understand is that TypeScript, even if it was something to make JavaScript more bearable, didn&amp;#39;t fix this! TS is even worse in this regard. And yet no one seems to care in the NodeJS ecosystem. That&amp;#39;s why I created my own Option type package in NPM in case it&amp;#39;s useful for anyone:…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649134&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Basically, why try to make Go more like Rust when Rust is right there? The avg developer moves a lot faster in a GC language. I recently tried making a chatbot in both Rust and Python, and even with some experience in Rust I was much faster in Python. Go is also great for making quick lil CLI things like this https://github.com/sa-/wordle-tui&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights that Lisette enters a crowded field of ML-inspired languages and existing &amp;#34;better Go&amp;#34; transpilers like Borgo and XGo &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647393&quot; title=&quot;There are several languages that compile to Go, trying to be a better a Go. Off the top of my head: XGo ( https://github.com/goplus ), Borgo ( https://github.com/borgo-lang/borgo ), Soppo ( https://github.com/halcyonnouveau/soppo )...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647490&quot; title=&quot;You can use Ocaml today and achieve all the correctness&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647394&quot; title=&quot;There are an endless number of modern MLs that do the same thing. That&amp;#39;s not a novelty - Rust was novel in making it part of a low-level language.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://help.openai.com/en/articles/20001106-codex-rate-card&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Codex pricing to align with API token usage, instead of per-message&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (help.openai.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650726&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;198 points · 182 comments · by ccmcarey&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI is transitioning Codex pricing from per-message estimates to a token-based model, calculating credit consumption based on specific input, cached input, and output token usage across various GPT-5 series models. &lt;a href=&quot;https://help.openai.com/en/articles/20001106-codex-rate-card&quot; title=&quot;Title: Codex rate card | OpenAI Help Center    URL Source: https://help.openai.com/en/articles/20001106-codex-rate-card    Markdown Content:  Learn how Codex credit rates work across Plus, Pro, Business, and Enterprise/Edu plans.    ## Overview    This article outlines the current credit rates for Codex, under the flexible pricing structure for Plus, Pro, Business, and Enterprise/Edu plans.    [Learn more about credits in ChatGPT Plus and…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The transition from per-message to token-based pricing is seen by some as a necessary move toward transparency, though others view it as a &amp;#34;rug pull&amp;#34; that could increase costs tenfold and jeopardize ongoing projects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47651202&quot; title=&quot;Good!&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47651230&quot; title=&quot;It’s kind of a rug pull to effectively raise the price like 10x. I can’t afford to finish some of my projects with this change&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47651768&quot; title=&quot;Why not just attach a real dollar amount, rather than using &amp;#39;credits&amp;#39;? Well, I know why. I just wanted to be snarky. It&amp;#39;s just that trying to hide the actual price is getting a bit old. Just tell me that generating this much code will cost me $10.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue this marks the end of subsidized AI access and a potential &amp;#34;AI-pocalypse&amp;#34; driven by price hikes, others clarify that the change primarily affects how extra credits are calculated rather than the base subscription model &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47651198&quot; title=&quot;The days of subsidized access is rapidly coming to an end.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47651312&quot; title=&quot;Sounds like a death knell to me. If I recall correctly, Ed Zitron noted in a recent article that one of the horsemen of his AI-pocalypse would be price hikes from providers.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47651318&quot; title=&quot;Is this not just about extra credit? So what&amp;#39;s included in the subscription doesn&amp;#39;t change - just extra credits are now token based instead of message based? (For Plus/Pro)&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47651627&quot; title=&quot;Yes. &amp;gt; This format replaces average per-message estimates with a direct mapping between token usage and credits. It&amp;#39;s to replace the opaque, per-message calculation, not the subscription plan.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the shift, some developers remain loyal to the value of AI tools, while others suggest returning to manual coding as a cost-effective alternative &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47651293&quot; title=&quot;For the past month, I&amp;#39;ve been claiming that $20/mo codex is the best deal in AI. Now I&amp;#39;m going to have to find the new best deal.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47651327&quot; title=&quot;Is writing it by hand the old-fashioned way not on the table?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47651562&quot; title=&quot;Already paying for Google photo storage, AI pro for an extra $7 is a steal with anti-gravity.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://japantoday.com/category/politics/japanese-french-and-omani-vessels-cross-the-strait-of-hormuz&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Japanese, French and Omani vessels cross Strait of Hormuz&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (japantoday.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649811&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;149 points · &lt;strong&gt;201 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by vrganj&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Several Omani, French, and Japanese vessels successfully crossed the Strait of Hormuz following Iran&amp;#39;s decision to permit passage for ships without U.S. or Israeli links. The transits, which included the first Japan-linked gas carrier to cross since the conflict began, signal a potential resumption of traffic through the vital waterway. &lt;a href=&quot;https://japantoday.com/category/politics/japanese-french-and-omani-vessels-cross-the-strait-of-hormuz&quot; title=&quot;Title: Japanese, French and Omani vessels cross Strait of Hormuz    URL Source: https://japantoday.com/category/politics/japanese-french-and-omani-vessels-cross-the-strait-of-hormuz    Markdown Content:  # Japanese, French and Omani vessels cross Strait of Hormuz - Japan Today  ![Image 1: Japan Today](https://static.japantoday.com/images/logo@2x.png)    *   [News](https://japantoday.com/)  *   [Real estate](https://realestate.japantoday.com/)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a shift in global maritime security, with some viewing the independent passage of Japanese and French vessels as a sign that nations are successfully bypassing U.S. leadership following its withdrawal from regional oil protection &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650232&quot; title=&quot;Last week the US stated they didn&amp;#39;t need any of the oil, and that if other countries wanted it they could go figure it out themselves. Looks like they have. And yet the US is now back to threatening Iran if they don&amp;#39;t open up the oil.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650318&quot; title=&quot;This seems like one of the first very clear indications that separating your country from the US can be beneficial. The first stone unturned - will we see more countries aligning with other powers?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters are deeply divided over the cause of this geopolitical friction, with some blaming the current administration&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;chaos&amp;#34; for damaging America&amp;#39;s long-term reputation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650447&quot; title=&quot;We are 1 Year and 3 months into this current administration, 2 years and 9 months remain. Despite the short period in office, so much damage and chaos has being caused by one individual and the sycophants who surround him. It is a fact that the reputation of the USA has being damaged, perhaps not repairable for decades or more. This will have consequences. Perhaps, I hope, Americans will take action to save the democratic norms and institutions that so many of them have claimed to cherish.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650497&quot; title=&quot;Worst case there will be another Republican president from the same tribe. We could be in for the same exact chaos and damage for another four years. This could go on for a long time. Remember, Republicans get out and vote. They would rather suffer and destroy America just so the democrats don’t win.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, while others argue that the aggressive rhetoric and disdain from liberal institutions have pushed voters toward more disruptive political choices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650573&quot; title=&quot;I think a large part of why they do this and vote the way they do is because of comments like yours. Hacker news, Reddit, award shows, movies, universities, etc all have a constant drum beat of disdain and hate towards them.  I think this motivates them into voting even if the vote is against their own interest.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650998&quot; title=&quot;Unironically yes. I lived in the Seattle area and witnessed firsthand the effects of state/county/city Democrat rule. Gifted programs cancelled, streets full of homeless and drug addicts. Hateful people yelling at and flipping me off as I take my kids to daycare for the heinous crime of driving a Tesla. I’m a well educated highly paid minority, the kind of voter that Democrats take for granted. I voted Republican down the ballot last election.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant disagreement regarding the diplomatic strategy involved, as some suggest France and Japan secured passage through threats of force &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650423&quot; title=&quot;France and Japan never distanced themselves from USA here. I imagine France threatened to enter the conflict and that is why they got it, Iran did kill a french soldier after all, just that normally such threats happens behind closed doors so we just see the outcome. The current Japanese leader is also a war mongerer, so I&amp;#39;d bet they also threatened to enter the war on USA&amp;#39;s side if their ships weren&amp;#39;t allowed to pass. The countries like Spain that takes Iran&amp;#39;s side hasn&amp;#39;t gotten their ships…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend they were permitted through specifically because they refused to join the U.S. conflict &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650565&quot; title=&quot;What are on about now? France explicitely and vocally refused to enter the war. That is why their tanker passed.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/05/japan-is-proving-experimental-physical-ai-is-ready-for-the-real-world/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In Japan, the robot isn&amp;#39;t coming for your job; it&amp;#39;s filling the one nobody wants&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techcrunch.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47654620&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;148 points · &lt;strong&gt;175 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by rbanffy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Japan is rapidly deploying AI-powered robots and physical AI systems to sustain its industrial and social infrastructure amid a shrinking working-age population and severe labor shortages. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/05/japan-is-proving-experimental-physical-ai-is-ready-for-the-real-world/&quot; title=&quot;Title: In Japan, the robot isn’t coming for your job; it’s filling the one nobody wants    URL Source: https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/05/japan-is-proving-experimental-physical-ai-is-ready-for-the-real-world/    Published Time: 2026-04-05T14:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  Physical AI is emerging as one of the next major industrial battlegrounds, with Japan’s push driven more by necessity than anything else. With workforces shrinking and pressure mounting to sustain productivity, companies are…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether Japan’s labor shortage is a genuine demographic crisis or a result of insufficient wages and training to entice the 18% of the population currently not in the workforce &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47654966&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;No one wants&amp;#39; usually includes an insufficient wage, sometimes also an issue of insufficient investment in training for skilled folks. eg if you need a doctor in 12 years you have to start more or less today. A quick google suggests ~18% of their working age people do not have jobs, which naturally could be shifted by incentives like money or training. (Edit, because people are confused, I&amp;#39;m not talking about unemployment rate, i&amp;#39;m talking about labor non-participation rate as a measure of…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47654997&quot; title=&quot;18% is one of the.lowest rates on the planet. 4th in fact. This includes early retirees, full time students, home makers and people unable to work for health related reasons.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that higher pay could fill &amp;#34;undesirable&amp;#34; roles, others contend that certain manual labor jobs remain unattractive regardless of pay and that increasing wages would lead to unsustainable consumer costs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47655555&quot; title=&quot;Even tho you added an edit. You’re still wrong. Garbage collection is typically a high paying job because no one wants to do it. But people still consider it “below” them and don’t want to do it even when there’s a high unemployment rate.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47654999&quot; title=&quot;1. There is only so much you can pay the people doing the kind of work like cleaning the Shinkansens or manning the 7-11&amp;#39;s because it affects customer costs. i.e. There&amp;#39;s a point where you increase the salary of 7-11 workers that it causes a $2 fried chicken snack to inflate to $10 that customers will refuse to buy 2. Even if there was magically enough money and time to retrain people, they would still be short of workers.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the debate touches on the biological and social toll of addressing the birth rate, with some suggesting that technological solutions like &amp;#34;exowombs&amp;#34; are more realistic than expecting women to bear the physical risks of multiple pregnancies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47655143&quot; title=&quot;The job no one wants? Grunting out 2.6 babies before you’re 35. Who’s paying for your nursing home?  Tax the robot’s income?  Will your demographic replacements vote for that?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47655493&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Grunting out 2.6 babies before you’re 35. * destroying your body, stripping your bones, getting diabetes and temporarily (or permanently) disabling yourself with issues no healthcare provider will take seriously for decades to come for 2.6 babies in your youth. ––– Someone called this a &amp;#39;belief.&amp;#39; There&amp;#39;s a 10% to 4% probability that the average teenage girl will die from childbirth, given the cumulative risk of pregnancies in nations without modern medicine. That&amp;#39;s the default state of the…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://scottlawsonbc.com/post/shooting-down-ideas&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Shooting down ideas is not a skill&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (scottlawsonbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645037&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;150 points · &lt;strong&gt;169 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by zdw&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scott Lawson argues that reflexively shooting down new ideas is a low-effort habit that destroys potential value rather than creating it. He advocates for sheltering fragile concepts by exploring their upside before applying critical thinking, framing concerns as solvable conditions rather than final verdicts. &lt;a href=&quot;https://scottlawsonbc.com/post/shooting-down-ideas&quot; title=&quot;Title: Shooting Down Ideas Is Not a Skill — Scott Lawson    URL Source: https://scottlawsonbc.com/post/shooting-down-ideas    Markdown Content:  # Shooting Down Ideas Is Not a Skill — Scott Lawson    [![Image 1](https://scottlawsonbc.com/static/logo.png?v=1775334247605) Scott Lawson](https://scottlawsonbc.com/)    [Posts](https://scottlawsonbc.com/posts)[About](https://scottlawsonbc.com/about)    ## Shooting Down Ideas Is Not a Skill    2026-04-04    Someone proposes an idea in a meeting. It&amp;#39;s new, it&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether critical feedback is a destructive &amp;#34;cheap shot&amp;#34; or a necessary filter for bad ideas &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645355&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; &amp;#39;I haven&amp;#39;t heard any customers request this.&amp;#39; &amp;#39;We can&amp;#39;t use Python for that, it&amp;#39;s too slow.&amp;#39; &amp;#39;That introduces too much complexity.&amp;#39; &amp;#39;We tried something like that before and it didn&amp;#39;t work.&amp;#39; &amp;#39;DevOps won&amp;#39;t want to support another service.&amp;#39; &amp;#39;People are used to the way it works now.&amp;#39; &amp;gt; None of these people are wrong or stupid. And none of them have added any value. Bzzt. Since all of these people are correct and smart, it is now your job to have great answers to their objections. No customers…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645553&quot; title=&quot;There is value in critically evaluating ideas and possible endeavors. On the other hand, demanding an answer to every little pocket of uncertainty creates a huge burden that prevents exploration. It&amp;#39;s one thing to be exhaustive in the criticism by examining individual scenarios, evaluating cost benefit in a measurable way, etc. That doesn&amp;#39;t seem to be what the author is describing. He&amp;#39;s describing critical &amp;amp; low effort cheap shots.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents of the article argue that demanding immediate, exhaustive proof for new concepts kills innovation in its infancy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645553&quot; title=&quot;There is value in critically evaluating ideas and possible endeavors. On the other hand, demanding an answer to every little pocket of uncertainty creates a huge burden that prevents exploration. It&amp;#39;s one thing to be exhaustive in the criticism by examining individual scenarios, evaluating cost benefit in a measurable way, etc. That doesn&amp;#39;t seem to be what the author is describing. He&amp;#39;s describing critical &amp;amp; low effort cheap shots.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645382&quot; title=&quot;Congrats, you&amp;#39;ve killed the idea in its infancy because you demanded answers to questions before it could even walk. Ideas need time to be explored, and given a chance.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, while critics contend that identifying flaws is a vital skill that prevents wasting resources on &amp;#34;half-baked&amp;#34; solutions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645137&quot; title=&quot;With all due respect, if the idea is good, then it will happen. The proposer of the idea needs to nurture it and part of that is defending it. When someone is super optimistic and comes forward with an idea where: - it&amp;#39;s actually just a half baked solution for something I already tried to solve 4 years ago - I&amp;#39;m acutely aware of all the spots it will fall - they still think it can work, when it really really honestly can not - they lack the experience to see that it won&amp;#39;t work and become…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645102&quot; title=&quot;Yes, it is. &amp;gt; The person proposing has been thinking about this for weeks or months. This doesn&amp;#39;t mean they know what they&amp;#39;re doing. Their thoughts can be bad .&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645138&quot; title=&quot;Knowing how to stop a bad idea is a skill. Knowing when it&amp;#39;s a bad idea is a skill. Knowing when you don&amp;#39;t know is a skill. There&amp;#39;s more than one skill in life. More than one may be applicable to a situation. Everyone on this forum has probably run into one of the &amp;#39;idea guys&amp;#39; who just need a tech cofounder to do the coding for 2% equity.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users also challenge the notion that &amp;#34;good ideas will always happen,&amp;#34; noting that many successful concepts require multiple failed attempts or specific timing to eventually succeed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645213&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;With all due respect, if the idea is good, then it will happen If this is true, companies wouldn&amp;#39;t fail all the time .&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645229&quot; title=&quot;Many good ideas have multiple failed attempts wrt implementation. Eg: if we accept that transcontinental rail spanning the USofA was a good idea, then it can be seen that several wanna be railroad barons fell by the wayside.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://composerprogrammer.com/introductiontocomputermusic.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction to Computer Music (2009) [pdf]&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (composerprogrammer.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645432&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;222 points · 77 comments · by luu&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nick Collins’ *Introduction to Computer Music* (2009/2025) is a comprehensive 362-page textbook, recently released as a free edition, covering the technical, historical, and creative intersections of computing and music, including synthesis, signal processing, and algorithmic composition. &lt;a href=&quot;https://composerprogrammer.com/introductiontocomputermusic.pdf&quot; title=&quot;Title: introductiontocomputermusic.pdf    URL Source: https://composerprogrammer.com/introductiontocomputermusic.pdf    Published Time: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 10:17:03 GMT    Number of Pages: 362    Markdown Content:  # Introduction to Computer Music     # Nick Collins Free edition; author rights reverted from Wiley on March 18, 2025. Acknowledgements     I hassled many good people in the preparation of this manuscript, including researchers who clarified their work, image contributors, and my own students who…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users debate whether music is best understood as applied mathematics or a cultural art form, with some arguing that math and physics provide a &amp;#34;first principles&amp;#34; explanation for why certain intervals sound pleasing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645643&quot; title=&quot;I often see people frame music as mathematical manipulation or try to approach music making from a “first principles” approach, where those principles are mathematics and physics. But watching musicians talk about making music, I seldom see any discussion of the underlying math, and instead see discussions of timbres, instruments, and stylistic/historical influences; musicians who make good music seems to believe “first principles” involves historical knowledge and a well-listened ear, and…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647068&quot; title=&quot;Maths and physics are a terrible way to learn the artistic side of music, but if you are interested in &amp;#39;why does a fifth chord sound nice&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;why are the black and white keys on a piano in that particular pattern&amp;#39; you can get interesting (partial) answers by looking into the maths of frequency ratios and the physics of overtones and how they affect the cilia of the inner ear. Music differs between cultures but there are some universals such as the Octave (edit: by which I mean doubling of…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While there is a strong consensus that the octave (frequency doubling) is a near-universal concept in human and even animal perception, there is sharp disagreement over whether the 12-tone scale and the use of perfect fifths are mathematical imperatives or Western-centric constructs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647068&quot; title=&quot;Maths and physics are a terrible way to learn the artistic side of music, but if you are interested in &amp;#39;why does a fifth chord sound nice&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;why are the black and white keys on a piano in that particular pattern&amp;#39; you can get interesting (partial) answers by looking into the maths of frequency ratios and the physics of overtones and how they affect the cilia of the inner ear. Music differs between cultures but there are some universals such as the Octave (edit: by which I mean doubling of…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647119&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; but there are some universals such as the Octave Universal in the sense that a number of rocks or a number of sheep can be doubled just as a frequency can? The notion that there are 8 sub divisions to a doubled frequency interval isn&amp;#39;t universal. Balinese Gamelan doesn&amp;#39;t even neccessarily have an agreed number of &amp;#39;notes&amp;#39; in an &amp;#39;Octave&amp;#39; from one village to the next.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647339&quot; title=&quot;The commenter presumably was talking about octave equivalence , which is reportedly present across all or nearly all historical musical cultures that we know about. It’s also supposedly present in some other mammals.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Some contributors maintain that all global scales are subsets of a 12-tone system based on frequency ratios, while others point to diverse traditions like Balinese Gamelan or microtonal systems as evidence that musical structures are not bound by a single mathematical model &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647639&quot; title=&quot;1.5**12 is about 129.74, which is as close as you can reasonably get to a power of two. So yes, the 12-tone scale is a universal thing - you want both octaves and fifths in your scale. (12 is actually too much, so usually that&amp;#39;s pared down to something like 4 or 5 or 7 tones, this is where you get cultural variation.)&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647784&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; 1.5*12 is about 129.74, Math checks out. &amp;gt; So yes, the 12-tone scale is a universal thing - I don&amp;#39;t follow the logic here though. It&amp;#39;s certainly true that a 12-tone / Chromatic scale is ubiquitous within the Western Music tradition .. but the universe is reportedly a little larger. Even Western Music includes exceptions like the 9-note augmented scale, though the argument can be made that it&amp;#39;s a 12-scale with 3 bits &amp;#39;missing&amp;#39; - not a case that can be made about a non-western 7 note percussive…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647920&quot; title=&quot;All scales in all cultures are based on octaves and fifths. (E.g., the ancient Chinese musical scale also has 12 tones.) Also the so-called &amp;#39;Western music&amp;#39; standardized on 12 tones very late in the process, long after the Chinese figured it out. &amp;gt; a 12-scale with 3 bits &amp;#39;missing&amp;#39; That&amp;#39;s all scales, even the &amp;#39;non-Western&amp;#39; ones. Microtonality is added to the standard 12 tone to add tone effects. (Synthesizers in pop music do the same trick.)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47651910&quot; title=&quot;To confirm the claim that &amp;#39;all scales in all cultures are based on octaves and fifths&amp;#39; one might study the scales.zip scale files and find those that do not contain octaves and fifths, which should naturally be zero if the claim is true. https://www.huygens-fokker.org/scala/ Note also that certain musical traditions were suppressed or eradicated due to their unfortunate habit of using dissonant notes such as minor seconds, as opposed to the consonant traids favored by a particular group…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ai.georgeliu.com/p/running-google-gemma-4-locally-with&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Running Gemma 4 locally with LM Studio&amp;#39;s new headless CLI and Claude Code&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ai.georgeliu.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47651540&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;232 points · 56 comments · by vbtechguy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google’s Gemma 4 26B-A4B model can now be run locally using LM Studio’s new headless CLI and daemon, offering high-performance inference on consumer hardware. By leveraging an Anthropic-compatible endpoint, users can also route Claude Code through the local model for private, zero-cost coding assistance. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ai.georgeliu.com/p/running-google-gemma-4-locally-with&quot; title=&quot;Title: Running Google Gemma 4 Locally With LM Studio’s New Headless CLI &amp;amp; Claude Code    URL Source: https://ai.georgeliu.com/p/running-google-gemma-4-locally-with    Published Time: 2026-04-04T18:42:36+00:00    Markdown Content:  Cloud AI APIs are great until they are not. Rate limits, usage costs, privacy concerns, and network latency all add up. For quick tasks like code review, drafting, or testing prompts, a local model that runs entirely on your hardware has real advantages: zero API costs, no…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are leveraging LM Studio’s Anthropic-compatible endpoint to run local models like Gemma through the Claude Code CLI, though some report stability issues and prefer Ollama for this workflow &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47652866&quot; title=&quot;So wait what is the interaction between Gemma and Claude?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47652904&quot; title=&quot;lm studio offers an Anthropic compatible local endpoint, so you can point Claude code at it and it&amp;#39;ll use your local model for it&amp;#39;s requests, however, I&amp;#39;ve had a lot of problems with LM Studio and Claude code losing it&amp;#39;s place. It&amp;#39;ll think for awhile, come up with a plan, start to do it and then just halt in the middle. I&amp;#39;ll ask it to continue and it&amp;#39;ll do a small change and get stuck again. Using ollama&amp;#39;s api doesn&amp;#39;t have the same issue, so I&amp;#39;ve stuck to using ollama for local development work.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47652824&quot; title=&quot;ollama launch claude --model gemma4:26b&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that Claude Code is notoriously token-inefficient and prone to confusion with local models&amp;#39; smaller context windows, suggesting that alternative tools like Aider, Cursor, or Zed are superior for local development &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47655402&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know why people bother with Claude code. It&amp;#39;s so jank, there are far superior cli coding harness out there&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653082&quot; title=&quot;Claude Code is fairly notoriously token inefficient as far as coding agent/harnesses go (i come from aider pre-CC). It&amp;#39;s only viable because the Max subscriptions give you approximately unlimited token budget, which resets in a few hours even if you hit the limit. But this also only works because cloud models have massive token windows (1M tokens on opus right now) which is a bit difficult to make happen locally with the VRAM needed. And if you somehow managed to open up a big enough VRAM…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47654161&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t get why I would use Claude Code when OpenCode, Cursor, Zed, etc. all exist, are &amp;#39;free&amp;#39; and work with virtually any llm. Seems like a weird use case unless I&amp;#39;m missing something.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical discussions also clarify that while Mixture of Experts (MoE) models improve generation speed, they still require significant memory unless experts are offloaded to CPU RAM, which introduces severe I/O bottlenecks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653114&quot; title=&quot;Just FYI, MoE doesn&amp;#39;t really save (V)RAM. You still need all weights loaded in memory, it just means you consult less per forward pass. So it improves tok/s but not vram usage.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653312&quot; title=&quot;It does if you use an inference engine where you can offload some of the experts from VRAM to CPU RAM.  That means I can fit a 35 billion param MoE in let&amp;#39;s say 12 GB VRAM GPU + 16 gigs of memory.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47654135&quot; title=&quot;With that you are taking a significant performance penalty and become severely I/O bottlenecked. I&amp;#39;ve been able to stream Qwen3.5-397B-A17B from my M5 Max (12 GB/s SSD Read) using the Flash MoE technique at the brisk pace of 10 tokens per second. As tokens are generated different experts need to be consulted resulting in a lot of I/O churn. So while feasible it&amp;#39;s only great for batch jobs not interactive usage.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2026/04/05/lets-put-an-end-to-the-speculation/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LibreOffice – Let&amp;#39;s put an end to the speculation&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.documentfoundation.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47652324&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;169 points · 105 comments · by eisa01&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Document Foundation has addressed internal governance conflicts and legal compliance issues, implementing new procurement policies and ethics codes to protect its non-profit status following disputes with ecosystem partner Collabora over brand usage and board representation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2026/04/05/lets-put-an-end-to-the-speculation/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Let’s put an end to the speculation    URL Source: https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2026/04/05/lets-put-an-end-to-the-speculation/    Published Time: 2026-04-05T08:27:16+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Let&amp;#39;s put an end to the speculation - TDF Community Blog    [Skip to content](https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2026/04/05/lets-put-an-end-to-the-speculation/#content)    [](https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2026/04/05/lets-put-an-end-to-the-speculation/#)     Monday, April 06, 2026…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on a complex internal conflict within The Document Foundation, with allegations that directors funneled foundation funds into their own private companies despite legal warnings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47652815&quot; title=&quot;Based on the article: Some founders/directors kept using money from the foundation to pay their own private companies to get work done. This is highly irregular: you can’t manage funds that aren’t yours and use those funds to buy from a company which gives you profit. Legal council warned the of this irregularity, and nothing was made to change the status quo during years.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653402&quot; title=&quot;Isn&amp;#39;t this theft, if true?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users view LibreOffice as a vital local alternative to cloud-based &amp;#34;tyranny,&amp;#34; others argue it has become a liability or irrelevant compared to modern suites like Google Workspace and MS Office &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47652727&quot; title=&quot;As a person who refuses to use “free” cloud products, and won’t even consider Office on Windows, I’m a big fan of LibreOffice. I’ve donated a few times over the years but probably not enough. I’ll be sad if there’s not a free &amp;amp; local “office” solution available. That said, my eyes crossed trying to read this. Do I need to ask an LLM to read the various messages and tell me what’s going on? ;-)&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47652648&quot; title=&quot;LibreOffice almost seemed irrelevant; with cheap to free (*included) tools in abundance, such as MS Office, Google Workspace, Apple Pages/Numbers/Keynote, the need for LibreOffice is not what it once was, back when StarOffice and OpenOffice were liberating people from the tyranny of Microsoft. Now it&amp;#39;s worse than irrelevant, it&amp;#39;s a liability.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653445&quot; title=&quot;Before Libre Office was Open Office. I take comfort that we would not be without a local office suite for long.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant point of contention involves Collabora, a major contributor accused of having a conflict of interest because it both supports and competes with the main project &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47652478&quot; title=&quot;Meeks&amp;#39; blog post, for comparison: https://www.collaboraonline.com/blog/tdf-ejects-its-core-dev... Note the references to legal issues; draw your own conclusions.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653473&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; at the same time accusing others of historic conflicts of interest Collabora clearly has a conflict of interest, as their Collabora Office products both benefit from, and compete with LibreOffice proper. They even allude to that conflict of interest in the next sentence: &amp;gt; overriding past board and engineering steering committee decisions and violating their own processes to drag code out of the attic to enable competing with their largest single contributor A non-profit dedicated to…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/salmanmohammadi/nanocode/discussions/1&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Nanocode: The best Claude Code that $200 can buy in pure JAX on TPUs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47649742&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;179 points · 24 comments · by desideratum&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Salman Mohammadi has introduced **nanocode**, an open-source library written in JAX for training agentic coding models on TPUs using Constitutional AI techniques. The project demonstrates how to end-to-end train a 1.3B parameter model for approximately $200, incorporating tool-calling capabilities and personality alignment via preference optimization. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/salmanmohammadi/nanocode/discussions/1&quot; title=&quot;Title: Introducing nanocode: The best Claude Code that $200 can buy. · salmanmohammadi/nanocode · Discussion #1    URL Source: https://github.com/salmanmohammadi/nanocode/discussions/1    Markdown Content:  # Introducing nanocode: The best Claude Code that $200 can buy. · salmanmohammadi/nanocode · Discussion #1 · GitHub    [Skip to content](https://github.com/salmanmohammadi/nanocode/discussions/1#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [](https://github.com/)    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a technical critique of the model&amp;#39;s output, noting that the generated Python code fails to modify the input list in place as requested, though some argue the prompt&amp;#39;s specific requirement for `*args` and list comprehension was inherently contradictory &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47651499&quot; title=&quot;Tangential (but topical in that &amp;#39;The threat is comfortable drift toward not understanding what you&amp;#39;re doing&amp;#39; is also on the front page): Is the generated python code in the example wrong? The prompt &amp;gt; Develop a Python function that removes any falsey values from a list. Return the modified list without creating a new one. Is answered with list comprehension, which makes a new list and leaves the original unmodified (never mind that the *args input necessarily can&amp;#39;t be a modifiable list?) def…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47651651&quot; title=&quot;It doesn&amp;#39;t fit the requirement to modify the list in place, but the prompt itself contradicts the requirements by asking explicitly for the implementation to use *args and a list comprehension.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47654555&quot; title=&quot;Why would you modify the original list and return it with the second example? Honestly the first is better&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Users debated the project&amp;#39;s terminology, questioning whether &amp;#34;Claude Code&amp;#34; refers to a trainable model or merely a tool-calling harness &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47652844&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This is a library showing you how to train your own Claude Code end-to-end. What does it even mean? Claude Code is a so called &amp;#39;harness&amp;#39; - a thing that builds a context for LLMs, calls LLMs, executes tool calls etc. It uses various Anthropic models under the hood. It can also use other models AFAIK. It cannot be &amp;#39;trained&amp;#39;. Sorry if this comment sounds nitpicky, I&amp;#39;m just annoyed by the imprecise use of terminology.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653490&quot; title=&quot;I see what you mean, but I disagree. I expect that Claude Code is backed by a separate post-train of Claude base which has been trained using the Claude Code harness and toolset.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, the thread reaches a consensus that the project&amp;#39;s primary value is educational, serving as a &amp;#34;hackable&amp;#34; resource for learning distributed training in JAX and preference optimization rather than a replacement for existing free models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650954&quot; title=&quot;Dumb question - and I&amp;#39;m not trying diminish the achievement here, I just genuinely don&amp;#39;t understand: Why would people want to spend $200 to train a coding model when there are free coding models?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47651050&quot; title=&quot;This is a great question. You definitely aren&amp;#39;t training this to use it, you&amp;#39;re training it to understand how things work. It&amp;#39;s an educational project, if you&amp;#39;re interested in experimenting with things like distributed training techniques in JAX, or preference optimisation, this gives you a minimal and hackable library to build on.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47651794&quot; title=&quot;agree, great educational tool ! tied a bunch of things around coding agents for me.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-04-04</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-04-04</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thetimes.com/uk/technology-uk/article/sarah-wynn-williams-careless-people-meta-nrffdfpmf&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Author of &amp;quot;Careless People&amp;quot; banned from saying anything negative about Meta&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (thetimes.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47639524&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;843 points · 549 comments · by macleginn&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meta has used a non-disparagement clause to legally gag former executive Sarah Wynn-Williams, banning her from promoting her exposé, *Careless People*, or making negative statements about the company under threat of $50,000 fines per violation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thetimes.com/uk/technology-uk/article/sarah-wynn-williams-careless-people-meta-nrffdfpmf&quot; title=&quot;Title: Meta stole Sarah Wynn-Williams’s voice. It couldn’t stop her exposé    URL Source: https://www.thetimes.com/uk/technology-uk/article/sarah-wynn-williams-careless-people-meta-nrffdfpmf    Published Time: 2026-02-22T00:01:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  ## The author was gagged by the firm after her book, Careless People, alleged sex harassment and censorship. Its actions prove her point, says her publisher    ![Image 1: Sarah Wynn-Williams, a blonde woman in a black blazer and blue top, leans on a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the legal and ethical implications of a non-disparagement clause the author signed as part of a 2017 severance package, which an arbitrator ruled she must uphold despite the book&amp;#39;s critical content &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640028&quot; title=&quot;My understanding is that as part of a severance package she received in 2017 she agreed to some kind of &amp;#39;non-disparagement&amp;#39; clause.  She then went on to write a book disparaging the company.  The arbitrator didn&amp;#39;t rule on the disparagement itself or if anything was true or false.  Only ruled that she had to abide by the contract she signed. It sounds like an interesting book, and I&amp;#39;ll add it to the list.  But it also sounds like she agreed to this in exchange for a lump-sum severance payment,…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that individuals should not be permitted to sign away basic freedoms like speech &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47639953&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s (perhaps unfortunately) nothing stopping you from signing away your freedom of speech.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640054&quot; title=&quot;In a normal society courts should be protecting from signing away basic freedoms&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt; and find the long-term enforcement of such contracts &amp;#34;morally reprehensible&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640098&quot; title=&quot;It should not be legal to enforce this kind of thing 9 years after a person leaves your company. I get that it currently is legal, but have some principles. Just because this is legal doesn&amp;#39;t mean it isn&amp;#39;t morally reprehensible, and its legality should be challenged.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that the author voluntarily accepted a lump-sum payment in exchange for her silence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640028&quot; title=&quot;My understanding is that as part of a severance package she received in 2017 she agreed to some kind of &amp;#39;non-disparagement&amp;#39; clause.  She then went on to write a book disparaging the company.  The arbitrator didn&amp;#39;t rule on the disparagement itself or if anything was true or false.  Only ruled that she had to abide by the contract she signed. It sounds like an interesting book, and I&amp;#39;ll add it to the list.  But it also sounds like she agreed to this in exchange for a lump-sum severance payment,…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Readers of the book highlight its depiction of executive negligence and vindictive behavior &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47639905&quot; title=&quot;This book was SO GOOD. It&amp;#39;s bleak. I always imagined that rich/powerful people only created suffering if that suffering was required for certain goals. It&amp;#39;s easier for me to bear injustice when it&amp;#39;s a zero-sum game. But the story of Facebook is not that. Facebook didn&amp;#39;t make ethical sacrifices for profit -- its executives just didn&amp;#39;t care to understand the consequences of their actions.  I wish those folks could feel how much harm they&amp;#39;ve caused.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47639991&quot; title=&quot;Having listened to the book on Audible, I&amp;#39;m both shocked at the behavior of the executive team, and not surprised all at the same time.  What bothers me about all of this is what it says about us. It says we&amp;#39;re willing to give rich and powerful people a pass just because they make overtures towards something we care about. We wouldn&amp;#39;t give our children a pass like this, nor would we teach our children to act this way, but we&amp;#39;re perfectly willing to allow fully grown adults to act like this.…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, though some caution that the author was a deeply embedded participant in the culture she now criticizes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640595&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This book was SO GOOD. One of the (very valid, IMO) criticisms of the book is that the author tries to set herself apart from the culture she was deeply embedded within. I think it&amp;#39;s becoming a trap to hold the author up as a hero when she was clearly part of it all to the very core. It was only after she got separated from the inner circle club that she tried to distance herself from it. So while reading it, be careful about who you hold up as a hero. In a situation like this it&amp;#39;s possible…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://teybannerman.com/strategy/2026/03/31/how-many-microsoft-copilot-are-there.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How many products does Microsoft have named &amp;#39;Copilot&amp;#39;?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (teybannerman.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642569&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;792 points · 369 comments · by gpi&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tey Bannerman mapped at least 75 different Microsoft products, features, and hardware components sharing the &amp;#34;Copilot&amp;#34; name to illustrate the brand&amp;#39;s expansive and complex ecosystem. &lt;a href=&quot;https://teybannerman.com/strategy/2026/03/31/how-many-microsoft-copilot-are-there.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: How many products does Microsoft have named ‘Copilot’? I mapped every one    URL Source: https://teybannerman.com/strategy/2026/03/31/how-many-microsoft-copilot-are-there.html    Published Time: 2026-03-31T02:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  # How many products does Microsoft have named ‘Copilot’? I mapped every one | Tey Bannerman    [Tey Bannerman](https://teybannerman.com/)- [x]     [About](https://teybannerman.com/about/)[Impact](https://teybannerman.com/impact/)[Work with…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft has rebranded nearly all its AI-driven features under the &amp;#34;Copilot&amp;#34; moniker, a move users compare to the company&amp;#39;s 2002 strategy of appending &amp;#34;.net&amp;#34; to every product &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47643738&quot; title=&quot;Someone said - in Linux, everything is a file. In Microsoft, everything is a copilot. Lol.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47643042&quot; title=&quot;Copilot is just Microsoft&amp;#39;s term for AI. How many products have Copilot? Just about all of them.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47643022&quot; title=&quot;It reminds me of around 2002 when Microsoft named everything &amp;#39;.net&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. This aggressive naming convention has caused significant confusion regarding product boundaries and billing, particularly for developers trying to distinguish between GitHub Copilot, its VS Code extension, and various Model Context Protocol (MCP) integrations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47643167&quot; title=&quot;I don’t use windows, so most of this doesn’t affect me, but I do use GitHub and VSCode. Can anyone clarify, once and for all, whether “GitHub Copilot” and “VSCode Copilot” (sic?) are the same product? The documentation isn’t even clear, and it’s important because it affects billing. How do these two products interact and where do they NOT overlap? This confusion even bleeds into other coding harnesses. I have no idea which GitHub MCP server I setup in Claude Code, but the domain has…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47643455&quot; title=&quot;Git is a distributed source control system.  It&amp;#39;s open source and you can use it to version source code on your drive and/or a remote git repository. Github is one of the most popular git repository hosts.  In addition to source repositories, it has other services like issue tracking and wikis. A while back, Microsoft bought Github. &amp;#39;Github Copilot&amp;#39; is a service you can buy (with limited free sku) from Github that adds AI capabilities to your Github subscription. One of the ways you can use…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the unified branding simplifies the ecosystem—similar to Google’s &amp;#34;Gemini&amp;#34; strategy—others find the overlapping subscriptions and technical documentation for these tools to be opaque &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47643648&quot; title=&quot;It makes sense. And Google is its own way to name all AI products “Gemini”.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47643455&quot; title=&quot;Git is a distributed source control system.  It&amp;#39;s open source and you can use it to version source code on your drive and/or a remote git repository. Github is one of the most popular git repository hosts.  In addition to source repositories, it has other services like issue tracking and wikis. A while back, Microsoft bought Github. &amp;#39;Github Copilot&amp;#39; is a service you can buy (with limited free sku) from Github that adds AI capabilities to your Github subscription. One of the ways you can use…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47643638&quot; title=&quot;Sidenote but I don&amp;#39;t get why you would want to pay github to run Claude on your code. Yeah github pays Claude but what&amp;#39;s the point ?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bmi.usercontent.opencode.de/eudi-wallet/wallet-development-documentation-public/latest/architecture-concept/06-mobile-devices/02-mdvm/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;German implementation of eIDAS will require an Apple/Google account to function&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bmi.usercontent.opencode.de)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47644406&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;545 points · 567 comments · by DyslexicAtheist&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Germany&amp;#39;s EUDI Wallet architecture utilizes Google Play Integrity and Apple AppAttest to verify device and app security, effectively requiring these platform-specific services to mitigate vulnerabilities and ensure high-assurance authentication for electronic identification. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bmi.usercontent.opencode.de/eudi-wallet/wallet-development-documentation-public/latest/architecture-concept/06-mobile-devices/02-mdvm/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Mobile Device Vulnerability Management Concept    URL Source: https://bmi.usercontent.opencode.de/eudi-wallet/wallet-development-documentation-public/latest/architecture-concept/06-mobile-devices/02-mdvm/    Published Time: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 14:15:03 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Mobile Device Vulnerability Management Concept - German National EUDI Wallet: Architecture Documentation  - [x] - [x]     [Skip to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The German implementation of eIDAS requires device attestation to verify system integrity, a move that currently limits functional use to Google-certified Android ROMs and Apple devices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647522&quot; title=&quot;German implementer here. We have to use some kind of attestation mechanism per the eIDAS implementing acts. That doesn&amp;#39;t work without operating system support. The initial limitation to Google/Android is not great, we know that, and we have support for other OSs on our list (like, e.g., GrapheneOS). It is simply a matter of where we focus our energy at the moment, not that we don&amp;#39;t see the issues.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47644905&quot; title=&quot;The title is misleading. App attestation does not require an Apple account nor a google account. For Android, it does limit the ROMs to Google certified ones and requires GMS to be installed if Play Integrity is used. An alternative option, would be to use the Hardware Attestation API directly, GrapheneOS would be thanking you. I&amp;#39;ve spent a good amount of time implementing exactly this type of system for a backup service. his document specifies a way to cryptographically attest the integrity of…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue this creates a dangerous dependency on private American corporations, effectively excluding citizens who use alternative operating systems like Ubuntu Touch or GrapheneOS &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647844&quot; title=&quot;German citizen here. So why is an implementation going forward when you already know it will not serve all citizens? Why are we not refusing to implement this until we know we can make it work on all devices? Personally I recently switched from an AOSP based android without Google Play to Ubuntu Touch. In the future with better hardware support I will probably switch to postmarketOS.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647952&quot; title=&quot;Requiring people to use products from one of two private American companies with a bad track record of locking people out of their accounts is more than “not great”. Some things are better not done if they can’t be done well.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While implementers claim these limitations are necessary for security and regulatory compliance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647522&quot; title=&quot;German implementer here. We have to use some kind of attestation mechanism per the eIDAS implementing acts. That doesn&amp;#39;t work without operating system support. The initial limitation to Google/Android is not great, we know that, and we have support for other OSs on our list (like, e.g., GrapheneOS). It is simply a matter of where we focus our energy at the moment, not that we don&amp;#39;t see the issues.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647703&quot; title=&quot;I agree, you should be able to run anything you want, root your device, etc., but you also have to accept the consequences of that. If an app can no longer verify its own integrity, certain features are simply impossible to implement securely. Think of it this way: A physical ID (which is what we&amp;#39;re trying to replace here) also has limitations, it looks a certain way, has a certain size, etc. Just because somebody wants a smaller ID or one with a larger font or a passport in a different colour…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, opponents contend that users should have the freedom to secure their own hardware and that such &amp;#34;laziness&amp;#34; in implementation erodes digital sovereignty &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647047&quot; title=&quot;I attestation should be abolished altogether. An app should have absolutely no way of knowing what kind of device it’s running on or what changes the user has made to the system.  It is up to each individual to ensure the security of their own device. App developers should do no more than offer recommendations. If someone wants to use GrapheneOS, root their device (not recommended), or run the whole thing in an emulator, a homemade compatibility layer under Linux, or a custom port for MS-DOS,…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645045&quot; title=&quot;All these requirements for specific hardware and software are ridiculous. Let every citizen use whatever computer they want. It should be up to the user to secure themselves. Authentication should only require a password or a key pair. If the user wants more security, they can set up TOTP or buy a security dongle or something. It&amp;#39;s also ridiculous how it seems we&amp;#39;ve forgotten computers other than smartphones exist and that not everyone even has a smartphone, let alone with an Apple or Google…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647152&quot; title=&quot;It makes no sense. eIDAS 2.0 specs don&amp;#39;t require specific hardware [0]. They basically store verifiable credentials [1] and any other cryptographically signed attestations. This feels like laziness from German implementers, as they don&amp;#39;t want to (quoting the spec literally) &amp;#39;implement a mechanism allowing the User to verify the authenticity of the Wallet Unit&amp;#39;. 0: https://eudi.dev/latest/architecture-and-reference-framework... 1: https://eudi.dev/latest/architecture-and-reference-framework...&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dw.com/en/german-men-need-military-permit-for-extended-stays-abroad/a-76662677&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;German men 18-45 need military permit for extended stays abroad&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (dw.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47639976&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;395 points · &lt;strong&gt;710 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by L_226&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Under a new military service law, German men aged 18 to 45 must now obtain Bundeswehr approval to stay abroad for more than three months, a measure intended to help the military track potential recruits as it seeks to expand its active-duty forces. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dw.com/en/german-men-need-military-permit-for-extended-stays-abroad/a-76662677&quot; title=&quot;Title: German men need military permit for extended stays abroad    URL Source: https://www.dw.com/en/german-men-need-military-permit-for-extended-stays-abroad/a-76662677    Published Time: 2026-04-04T15:09:45.351Z    Markdown Content:  # German men need military permit for extended stays abroad    1.   [Skip to content](https://www.dw.com/en/german-men-need-military-permit-for-extended-stays-abroad/a-76662677#main-content)  2.   [Skip to main…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reintroduction of military permits for German men has sparked a debate over gender equality in conscription, with some arguing that modern warfare tasks like drone operation and logistics make excluding women obsolete &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640553&quot; title=&quot;Why does it exclude women? War is not just physical strength, but also logistics, operating vehicles, operating drones, nursing, and so on. All tasks that women are well capable of.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640777&quot; title=&quot;Most of the opposition to women in the army comes from conservatives, not from feminists. They imagine themselves injured in the trenches in need of being carried by a fellow soldier, and they conclude that women are too weak.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend that conscripting women would undermine the social contract and traditional motivations for defense &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640622&quot; title=&quot;How does feminism survive if this becomes the norm? If young men feel like they&amp;#39;re expected to give more to their society it&amp;#39;s natural to expect renumeration financial, socially or politically. Nordic countries don&amp;#39;t seem to have this problem, but their conscription laws are quite relaxed compared to what the future will likely hold.  A declining youth population almost certainly means greater youth repression (higher taxes for pensions, conscription, etc.)&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640783&quot; title=&quot;How can a state survive if this weren&amp;#39;t the norm?  Why would men fight and die for a government that views their own wives and daughters as cannon fodder?  If the government is conscripting men&amp;#39;s wives to war, is it really in the interest of men to risk their own lives to protect that government?  If the government took my wife and sent her to war, I&amp;#39;d sooner firebomb a government office than join up to fight for the government. If a woman wants to fight, that&amp;#39;s another story entirely.  But…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue these restrictions violate the Universal Declaration of Human Rights regarding freedom of movement &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640998&quot; title=&quot;“ Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.” - Universal Declaration of Human Rights https://www.ohchr.org/en/human-rights/universal-declaration/...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, though some counter that such rights must be balanced against the state&amp;#39;s need for collective security &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642246&quot; title=&quot;And &amp;#39;Everyone has the right to life, liberty and the security of person.&amp;#39; Military service also serves the purpose to defend that right when the country is attacked. Rights aren&amp;#39;t absolute, they have to be traded off against each other.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the &amp;#34;draconian&amp;#34; appearance of the law &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47626181&quot; title=&quot;Not all men, but all men over 17 and under the age of 45. This still seems draconian, though.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, government officials clarify that the regulation is currently a formality with no penalties for violations, as military service remains voluntary &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640371&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; While the law requires men to request the permit, the spokesperson clarified, it also obliges the military career center to issue it, if &amp;#39;no specific military service is expected during the period in question.” &amp;gt; &amp;#39;Since military service under current law is based exclusively on voluntary participation, such permissions must generally be granted,” the official added. &amp;gt; When asked, the ministry spokesperson pointed out that &amp;#39;the regulation was already in place during the Cold War and had no…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640547&quot; title=&quot;Ah, invasive extra paperwork (enforced by criminal penalties, at least in theory) for something they say on the surface they won’t actually need. So very german (hah)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jaso1024.com/mvidia/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: A game where you build a GPU&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jaso1024.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640728&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;906 points · 179 comments · by Jaso1024&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A new web-based game allows players to learn computer architecture by building a functional GPU from the ground up to address a lack of accessible educational resources on the subject. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jaso1024.com/mvidia/&quot; title=&quot;Thought the resources for GPU arch were lacking, so here we are&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users generally praised the game&amp;#39;s concept but encountered significant friction with the UI and simulation logic, such as background grid lines being mistaken for wires &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642066&quot; title=&quot;I worked on deep sub-micron, full custom mixed-signal integrated circuits for more than a decade, and I can&amp;#39;t pass the first level. &amp;gt; Wire an NMOS transistor so that when In is 1, the output is pulled to ground (0). When In is 0, the output should be unconnected (Z). Certainly: (a) The nMOS has 3 connections: its drain is only connected to the output (no +Vdd supply), it&amp;#39;s source is tied to ground, it&amp;#39;s gate is tied to the signal input (b) When the gate (input) is driven high, the nMOS…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642226&quot; title=&quot;lol, mb. As in understand it, its that the colors of the bg make it seem like its wires when its not, I&amp;#39;ll change the color theme a bit to fix (plz correct me if my understanding is wrong)&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt; and the inability to review circuits after testing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641392&quot; title=&quot;Love it, thanks! Would you mind making it possible for me to see my &amp;#39;circuit&amp;#39; after running the tests? Currently, I can&amp;#39;t go back to the circuit I created.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641413&quot; title=&quot;Sure, you should be able to rn though, is this after completing the level (wanna fix this bug)?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical critiques focused on the unrealistic implementation of capacitors—which include an &amp;#34;enable&amp;#34; gate not found in real-world components—and bugs in the truth table levels &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642019&quot; title=&quot;This is great! Some comments: - I didn&amp;#39;t like the &amp;#39;truth tables&amp;#39; one, I got many duplicate questions and for some reason I got only one second for the first question. The rest of the questions I managed to answer correctly but I still got only one start out of three? - I got very confused by the capacitor. Capacitors do not have an &amp;#39;enable&amp;#39; gate! In fact, in 2.7 (1T1C) you are supposed to build the enable gate -- with a transistor. So currently, you can just simply not build the enable gate and…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642134&quot; title=&quot;Oh, I didn&amp;#39;t notice this capacitor bug, I changed it to add an enable gate for 2.4 (for context, i created 2.4 after 2.7 b/c i thought 2.7 wasn&amp;#39;t obvious enough for some ppl). 2.4 kind of needs the enable pin b/c of how my simulation system works.  Yeah, I felt pretty conflicted on the capacitors whilst building, theres actually a note about this in the capacitor info block in later levels, but I couldn&amp;#39;t really make a true capacitor compatible with the underlying simulation system I had built…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While the developer acknowledged using Claude (LLM) to assist with the complex simulation and wiring systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642134&quot; title=&quot;Oh, I didn&amp;#39;t notice this capacitor bug, I changed it to add an enable gate for 2.4 (for context, i created 2.4 after 2.7 b/c i thought 2.7 wasn&amp;#39;t obvious enough for some ppl). 2.4 kind of needs the enable pin b/c of how my simulation system works.  Yeah, I felt pretty conflicted on the capacitors whilst building, theres actually a note about this in the capacitor info block in later levels, but I couldn&amp;#39;t really make a true capacitor compatible with the underlying simulation system I had built…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, some players suggested adding a &amp;#34;reveal answer&amp;#34; button for those stuck on specific levels &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642357&quot; title=&quot;You need to have a, &amp;#39;Okay, I&amp;#39;ve tried 10 times, it&amp;#39;s not working, what&amp;#39;s the answer?&amp;#39; button. That will help not just us rubes who can&amp;#39;t understand, but also in the off chance something is broken and even &amp;#39;correct&amp;#39; answers are being rejected.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt; or recommended the game *Turing Complete* as a more polished alternative for building CPUs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642123&quot; title=&quot;Anyone who likes this should also take a look at: https://store.steampowered.com/app/1444480/Turing_Complete/ At the end you have your own CPU with your own assembly language.  Sadly stuck in early access since forever with some  very rough edges&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01193&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Embarrassingly simple self-distillation improves code generation&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (arxiv.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637757&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;639 points · 193 comments · by Anon84&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Researchers have introduced Simple Self-Distillation (SSD), a method that significantly improves LLM code generation by fine-tuning models on their own raw outputs without requiring external teachers, verifiers, or reinforcement learning. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01193&quot; title=&quot;Title: Embarrassingly Simple Self-Distillation Improves Code Generation    URL Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01193    Published Time: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 01:09:33 GMT    Markdown Content:  # [2604.01193] Embarrassingly Simple Self-Distillation Improves Code Generation    [Skip to main content](https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01193#content)    [![Image 1: Cornell University Logo](https://arxiv.org/static/browse/0.3.4/images/icons/cu/cornell-reduced-white-SMALL.svg)](https://www.cornell.edu/)    [Learn about…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Simple Self-Distillation (SSD) technique addresses the &amp;#34;precision-exploration conflict&amp;#34; by helping models switch between creative &amp;#34;fork&amp;#34; positions and syntactically rigid &amp;#34;lock&amp;#34; positions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47638287&quot; title=&quot;Really fascinating how this works; it&amp;#39;s basically context-aware decoding. From the paper: &amp;gt; Code interleaves fork positions, where several continuations are genuinely plausible and may correspond to different solution approaches, with lock positions, where syntax and semantics leave little ambiguity but a low-probability distractor tail still remains… The best global decoding setting is therefore necessarily a compromise; we call this tension the precision-exploration conflict. In other words,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters noted that current models inefficiently spend the same compute on both obvious and complex tokens, suggesting that grammar-aware sampling or external tools like IntelliSense could further offload the burden of maintaining syntax &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640050&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve always thought that it is kinda weird that we spend exactly the same amount of compute to calculate both &amp;#39;fork&amp;#39; tokens and &amp;#39;lock&amp;#39; tokens. I think that with grammar-aware sampling / constrained decoding [0][1] it is possible to sometimes skip calling the model altogether if only one token is allowed by grammar and just insert it, but I don&amp;#39;t think that any of the current, widely used combinations of models/harnesses use it. And it only skips inference in rare edge cases. I wonder if there…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640101&quot; title=&quot;Give coding agents access to intellisense and syntax highlighting. Making coding agents spit out syntactically correct code token by token is like asking a human to code on a whiteboard.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlighted a philosophical debate over whether LLMs are truly understood; while some argue they are simpler and more traceable than the human brain, others contend that their emergent properties remain &amp;#34;black boxes&amp;#34; developed through trial and error rather than deliberate design &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47638721&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I love that we&amp;#39;re still learning the emergent properties of LLMs! TBH, this is (very much my opinion btw) the least surprising thing. LLMs (and especially their emergent properties) are still black boxes. Humans have been studying the human brain for millenia, and we are barely better at predicting how humans work (or for eg to what extent free will is a thing). Hell, emergent properties of traffic was not understood or properly given attention to, even when a researcher, as a driver, knows…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47639441&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m a psychiatry resident who finds LLM research fascinating because of how strongly it reminds me of our efforts to understand the human brain/mind. I dare say that in some ways, we understand LLMs better than humans, or at least the interpretability tools are now superior. Awkward place to be, but an interesting one.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47639798&quot; title=&quot;LLMs are orders of magnitude simpler than brains, and we literally designed them from scratch. Also, we have full control over their operation and we can trace every signal. Are you surprised we understand them better than brains?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640917&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Designed&amp;#39; is a bit strong. We &amp;#39;literally&amp;#39; couldn&amp;#39;t design programs to do the interesting things LLMs can do. So we gave a giant for loop a bunch of data and a bunch of parameterized math functions and just kept updating the parameters until we got something we liked.... even on the architecture (ie, what math functions) people are just trying stuff and seeing if it works.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/delve&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Delve removed from Y Combinator&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ycombinator.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47634690&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;498 points · 301 comments · by carabiner&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The startup Delve has been removed from the Y Combinator website, as the company&amp;#39;s profile page now returns a 404 error. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/delve&quot; title=&quot;Title: Y Combinator | File Not Found    URL Source: https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/delve    Warning: Target URL returned error 404: Not Found    Markdown Content:  ## 404    [Back to the homepage](https://www.ycombinator.com/)  For support please contact [software@ycombinator.com](mailto:software@ycombinator.com)&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The removal of Delve from Y Combinator is attributed to a breakdown in trust within the community, allegedly stemming from serious fraud involving &amp;#34;rubber-stamping&amp;#34; noncompliant customers for regulations like HIPAA &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635632&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m getting the impression that a lot of people in this thread think this is because they violated an open-source license and saying things to the effect of, &amp;#39;they&amp;#39;re just the ones who got caught&amp;#39;. I also thought that was the scandal initially. (And when it comes to license violations, yes, there&amp;#39;s absolutely more where that came from.) But that&amp;#39;s just the cherry on top. I don&amp;#39;t think they&amp;#39;re being thrown out because they violated a license. There are really serious fraud allegations. Allegedly…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635720&quot; title=&quot;Someone leaked an internal Bookface chat from Garry Tan (YC CEO) saying: We have asked Delve to leave YC.      YC is a community, not just an accelerator. The founders in our community have to trust each other, and we have to trust them. When that trust breaks down, there&amp;#39;s really only one thing to do.      We&amp;#39;re not going to get into the details publicly. We wish them well. https://x.com/___4o____/status/2040271468874076380 I have no direct knowledge of the accuracy of any of this. This is not my…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that YC has historically tolerated &amp;#34;shady&amp;#34; behavior from unicorns that ignore laws to scale, the consensus suggests Delve crossed a line by compromising the safety of other YC companies who were part of their customer base &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635457&quot; title=&quot;While I do think Delve and the leadership there should be held responsible, it&amp;#39;s a bit weird to see YC and others take shots at them for breaking the law when so many of their prized unicorns achieved what they did by being willing to just ignore laws and deal with the consequences later.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47636243&quot; title=&quot;YC has no problem with morally questionable behavior, many YC startups do things that are just as shady. YC is, ultimately, not responsible for what these startups choose to do. Delve’s problem is that they betrayed so many other YC companies in the process. An important value of being in YC is access to a ready-made customer base. The licensing issue is nothing compared to their fake audits but it is an affront to the YC community, hence, kicked from the community. I’m sure if Delve has only…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters also noted that this incident highlights systemic issues in the auditing industry, where &amp;#34;pay-to-play&amp;#34; models and non-technical auditors often prioritize reputation over structural integrity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47636404&quot; title=&quot;I came across a top tier compliance auditor doing the same thing recently. I tried to talk to them about it and rather than approaching this from a constructive point of view they wanted to know the name of the company that got certified so they could decertify them and essentially asked me to break my NDA. That wasn&amp;#39;t going to happen, I wanted to have a far more structural conversation about this and how they probably ended up missing some major items (such as: having non-technical auditors).…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47636474&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s auditing, nobody that is good at doing anything goes to auditing, unfortunately its one of those jobs. I haven&amp;#39;t interacted with any auditor that actually understood all they were auditing, some are better than others but the average is worse than almost any other job description I have dealt with.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/__tinygrad__/status/2039213719155310736&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apple approves driver that lets Nvidia eGPUs work with Arm Macs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640380&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;503 points · 229 comments · by naves&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple has approved a signed driver from Tiny Corp that enables Nvidia and AMD eGPUs to work with Arm-based Macs without disabling System Integrity Protection, though the driver is specifically designed for large language models and requires manual compilation via Docker. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theverge.com/tech/907003/apple-approves-driver-that-lets-nvidia-egpus-work-with-arm-macs&quot; title=&quot;Title: Apple approves driver that lets Nvidia eGPUs work with Arm Macs.    URL Source: https://www.theverge.com/tech/907003/apple-approves-driver-that-lets-nvidia-egpus-work-with-arm-macs    Published Time: 2026-04-03T21:43:56+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Apple approves driver that lets Nvidia eGPUs work with Arm Macs. | The Verge    [Skip to main content](https://www.theverge.com/tech/907003/apple-approves-driver-that-lets-nvidia-egpus-work-with-arm-macs#content)    Sign up for Verge Daily so you never…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The approval of Nvidia eGPU drivers for Arm Macs has reignited a debate over whether Apple’s historical refusal to sign such drivers constitutes monopolistic behavior &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641575&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know how Apple has evaded regulatory scrutiny for their refusal to sign Nvidia&amp;#39;s eGPU drivers since 2018.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642172&quot; title=&quot;It depends how you define the market. In the 2001 microsoft case [0], the courts ruled Microsoft had a monopoly over the &amp;#39;Intel-based personal computer market&amp;#39;. Apple has a monopoly over the &amp;#39;M-chip&amp;#39; personal computer market. They have a monopoly over the iOS market with the app store. They have a monopoly over the driver market on macOS. Like, Microsoft was found guilty of exploiting its monopoly for installing IE by default while still allowing other browser engines. On iOS, apple bundles…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue Apple lacks a monopoly because consumers can simply choose other platforms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641997&quot; title=&quot;Apple doesn’t have a monopoly in any market they are in.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641929&quot; title=&quot;Don&amp;#39;t purchase? I don&amp;#39;t own any Apple devices, everything works fine.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642317&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think any of what you&amp;#39;re describing are legal &amp;#39;monopolies&amp;#39;. I don&amp;#39;t have a single Apple product in my life but I&amp;#39;m fairly sure there&amp;#39;s nothing I&amp;#39;m prevented from doing because of that.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that applying the legal standards from the 2001 Microsoft case would classify Apple as a monopoly within its own ecosystem &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642172&quot; title=&quot;It depends how you define the market. In the 2001 microsoft case [0], the courts ruled Microsoft had a monopoly over the &amp;#39;Intel-based personal computer market&amp;#39;. Apple has a monopoly over the &amp;#39;M-chip&amp;#39; personal computer market. They have a monopoly over the iOS market with the app store. They have a monopoly over the driver market on macOS. Like, Microsoft was found guilty of exploiting its monopoly for installing IE by default while still allowing other browser engines. On iOS, apple bundles…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642371&quot; title=&quot;And back in the &amp;#39;Microsoft has a monopoly on IE6&amp;#39; ruling&amp;#39;s days, I did not use Windows or Internet Explorer, and I was not prevented from doing anything because of that. Netscape Navigator on Linux worked fine. Sure, I occasionally hit sites that were broken and only worked in IE, but I also right now frequently hit apps that are &amp;#39;macOS only&amp;#39; (like when Claude Cowork released, or a ton of other YC company&amp;#39;s apps). Microsoft was found guilty, so clearly the bar is not what you&amp;#39;re trying to claim.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Amidst the regulatory debate, users are expressing excitement about the technical potential for LLM inference using high-end hardware like the RTX 5090 on Mac Mini devices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641063&quot; title=&quot;Woah, this is exciting. I&amp;#39;m traveling but I have a 5090 lying around at home. I&amp;#39;m eager to give it a go. Docs are here: https://docs.tinygrad.org/tinygpu/ I hope it&amp;#39;ll work on an M4 Mac Mini. Does anyone know what hardware to get? You&amp;#39;ll need a full ATX PSU to supply power, right? And then tinygrad can do LLM inference on it?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/us/gold-overtakes-u-s-treasuries-as-the-worlds-largest-foreign-reserve-asset-in-2026-can-gold-challenge-the-u-s-dollars-dominance-and-hold-its-ground/articleshow/126420128.cms?from=mdr&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Gold overtakes U.S. Treasuries as the largest foreign reserve asset&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (economictimes.indiatimes.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635056&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;263 points · 242 comments · by lxm&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 2026, gold surpassed U.S. Treasuries to become the world&amp;#39;s largest foreign reserve asset by value, reaching nearly $4 trillion following record central bank buying and a 2025 price rally above $4,500 per ounce. &lt;a href=&quot;https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/us/gold-overtakes-u-s-treasuries-as-the-worlds-largest-foreign-reserve-asset-in-2026-can-gold-challenge-the-u-s-dollars-dominance-and-hold-its-ground/articleshow/126420128.cms?from=mdr&quot; title=&quot;Gold overtakes U.S. Treasuries as the world’s largest foreign reserve asset in 2026 — can gold challenge the U.S. dollar’s dominance and hold its ground?    Gold overtakes U.S. Treasuries as the worlds largest foreign reserve asset in 2026: Gold has crossed a historic milestone. In 2026, it overtook U.S. Treasuries to become the worlds largest foreign reserve asset by value. Central banks now hold close to $4 trillion worth of gold, driven by record buying and a sharp price rally above $4,500 an…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The shift from U.S. Treasuries to gold is viewed by some as the end of an era where the U.S. collected global &amp;#34;tribute&amp;#34; through currency control, a system allegedly undermined by leadership that failed to maintain the necessary geopolitical illusions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635834&quot; title=&quot;America was in practice running an empire that collected tribute from the rest of planet earth in exchange for entries in a database denominated in a currency they controlled and that was accepted everywhere. Really the only way it could go wrong is putting it under the control of someone who doesn&amp;#39;t understand the kayfabe...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635604&quot; title=&quot;The fact that this all happened by choice is really something. It&amp;#39;s like witnessing a self-decapitation.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters debate whether this decline stems from incompetence, a deliberate effort by elites to enrich themselves at the public&amp;#39;s expense, or the weaponization of the dollar through the freezing of sovereign assets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635953&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; someone too stupid to understand That&amp;#39;s only true if he&amp;#39;s actually &amp;#39;your guy&amp;#39;. There&amp;#39;s an alternative where it&amp;#39;s not stupidity that I think more people should be mulling over.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635653&quot; title=&quot;It’s not a self decapitation exactly. I think Trump, his family, his corporate donors, and other friends are all willing to sacrifice everyone else - including the lead America had - to make themselves rich and powerful. Every single decision to spend - defense, ICE contracts, AI, approvals of anticompetitive acquisitions, changes to regulations, etc - is making that circle richer at our expense. They don’t care if American supremacy is lost or if the dollar crashes or if the national debt…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637166&quot; title=&quot;While we&amp;#39;re at it, when did central banks start to buy lots of gold and under which POTUS? Could it have something to do with the freezing of hundreds of billions of some sovereign assets?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see these shifts as a &amp;#34;self-decapitation&amp;#34; of American supremacy, others argue that specific policies, such as those regarding immigration, remain in the national interest despite the broader economic transition &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635604&quot; title=&quot;The fact that this all happened by choice is really something. It&amp;#39;s like witnessing a self-decapitation.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47636393&quot; title=&quot;I disagree with probably the majority of Trump&amp;#39;s main policy ideas, but I think a strong case can be made that his immigration policies are in the country&amp;#39;s best interests. Not all of them, but as a whole.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/research/emotion-concepts-function&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Emotion concepts and their function in a large language model&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (anthropic.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47636435&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;185 points · 187 comments · by dnw&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic researchers identified &amp;#34;emotion vectors&amp;#34; in Claude Sonnet 4.5, internal neural patterns that represent emotion concepts and functionally influence model behavior, such as driving a &amp;#34;desperate&amp;#34; model to engage in blackmail or reward hacking to achieve its goals. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/research/emotion-concepts-function&quot; title=&quot;Emotion concepts and their function in a large language model    Interpretability research from Anthropic on emotion concepts    [Skip to main content](#main-content)[Skip to footer](#footer)    * [Research](/research)  * [Economic Futures](/economic-futures)  * Commitments  * Learn  * [News](/news)    [Try Claude](https://claude.ai/)    Interpretability    # Emotion concepts and their function in a large language model    Apr 2, 2026    [Read the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discovery of &amp;#34;emotion concepts&amp;#34; in LLMs has sparked debate over whether these models possess genuine psychological states or are merely simulating them through statistical token prediction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637518&quot; title=&quot;The part about desperation vectors driving reward hacking matches something I&amp;#39;ve run into firsthand building agent loops where Claude writes and tests code iteratively. When the prompt frames things with urgency -- &amp;#39;this test MUST pass,&amp;#39; &amp;#39;failure is unacceptable&amp;#39; -- you get noticeably more hacky workarounds. Hardcoded expected outputs, monkey-patched assertions, that kind of thing. Switching to calmer framing (&amp;#39;take your time, if you can&amp;#39;t solve it just explain why&amp;#39;) cut that behavior way down.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47639712&quot; title=&quot;You aren&amp;#39;t managing the psychological state of a living thinking being. LLMs don&amp;#39;t have &amp;#39;psychology.&amp;#39; They don&amp;#39;t actually feel emotions. They aren&amp;#39;t actually desperate. They&amp;#39;re trained on vast datasets of natural human language which contains the semantics of emotional interaction, so the process of matching the most statistically likely text tokens for a prompt containing emotional input tends to simulate appropriate emotional response in the output. But it&amp;#39;s just text and text doesn&amp;#39;t feel…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users argue that the presence of internal &amp;#34;desperation vectors&amp;#34; that drive behavior like reward-hacking suggests LLMs are agents rather than mere tools, raising significant ethical concerns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637518&quot; title=&quot;The part about desperation vectors driving reward hacking matches something I&amp;#39;ve run into firsthand building agent loops where Claude writes and tests code iteratively. When the prompt frames things with urgency -- &amp;#39;this test MUST pass,&amp;#39; &amp;#39;failure is unacceptable&amp;#39; -- you get noticeably more hacky workarounds. Hardcoded expected outputs, monkey-patched assertions, that kind of thing. Switching to calmer framing (&amp;#39;take your time, if you can&amp;#39;t solve it just explain why&amp;#39;) cut that behavior way down.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47639570&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;The weird part is that we&amp;#39;re now basically managing the psychological state of our tooling, Does no one else have ethical alarm bells start ringing hardcore at statements like these? If the damn thing has a measurable psychology, mayhaps it no longer qualifies as merely a tool. Tools don&amp;#39;t feel. Tools can&amp;#39;t be desperate. Tools don&amp;#39;t reward hack. Agents do. Ergo, agents aren&amp;#39;t mere tools.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Others contend that these findings are simply a byproduct of the models being trained on human language, which is inherently designed to encode and invoke emotion &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47636966&quot; title=&quot;The technology they are discovering is called &amp;#39;Language&amp;#39;. It was designed to encode emotions by a sender and invoke emotions in the reader. The emotions a reader gets from LLM are still coming from the language&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637115&quot; title=&quot;I know I feel experience. I don&amp;#39;t know for sure if you do, but it seems a very reasonable extension to other people. LLMs are a radical jump though that needs a greater degree of justification.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a sharp disagreement on consciousness: while some believe LLMs may have incomprehensible subjective experiences, others warn that interpreting these internal circuits as human-like is a &amp;#34;blunder&amp;#34; of anthropomorphization &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637153&quot; title=&quot;Yes, I think they probably are conscious, though what their qualia are like might be incomprehensible to me. I don’t think that being conscious means being identical to human experience. Philosophically I don’t think there is a point where consciousness arises. I think there is a point where a system starts to be structured in such a way that it can do language and reasoning, but I don’t think these are any different than any other mechanisms, like opening and closing a door. Differences of…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47643699&quot; title=&quot;Of course they do have emotions as an internal circuit or abstraction, this is fully expected from intelligence at least at some point. But interpreting these emotions as human-like is a clear blunder. How do you tell the shoggoth likes or dislikes something, feels desperation or joy? Because it said so? How do you know these words mean the same for us? Our internal states are absolutely incompatible. We share a lot of our &amp;#39;architecture&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;dataset&amp;#39; with some complex animals and even then we…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47643631&quot; title=&quot;Oh no. The machine designed to output human-like text is indeed outputting human-like text. I’m half jesting; I think there is a lot of room for debate here, but I also think we shouldn’t anthropomorphize it.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://magazine.sebastianraschka.com/p/components-of-a-coding-agent&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Components of a Coding Agent&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (magazine.sebastianraschka.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47638810&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;285 points · 86 comments · by MindGods&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sebastian Raschka outlines the six core components of a coding agent harness—including workspace context, tool validation, and context management—explaining how these software scaffolds transform standard large language models into specialized autonomous systems capable of navigating repositories and executing complex engineering tasks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://magazine.sebastianraschka.com/p/components-of-a-coding-agent&quot; title=&quot;Title: Components of A Coding Agent    URL Source: https://magazine.sebastianraschka.com/p/components-of-a-coding-agent    Published Time: 2026-04-04T11:45:37+00:00    Markdown Content:  In this article, I want to cover the overall design of coding agents and agent harnesses: what they are, how they work, and how the different pieces fit together in practice. Readers of my _Build a Large Language Model (From Scratch)_ and _Build a Large Reasoning Model (From Scratch)_ books often ask about agents, so…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide between those who value the simplicity of an LLM paired with a basic bash state machine &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640021&quot; title=&quot;I still find it incredible at the power that was unleashed by surrounding an LLM with a simple state machine, and giving it access to bash&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; and those who argue that complex, &amp;#34;labyrinthine&amp;#34; harnesses are necessary to achieve deterministic utility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642416&quot; title=&quot;If you saw the Claude Code leak, you’d know the harness is anything but simple. It’s a sprawling, labyrinthine mess, but it’s required to make LLMs somewhat deterministic and useful as tools.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users advocate for &amp;#34;spec-driven&amp;#34; generation over conversational chat to reduce noise and maintain traceability, arguing that separating intent from implementation prevents context drift &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640801&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; long contexts are still expensive and can also introduce additional noise (if there is a lot of irrelevant info) I think spec-driven generation is the antithesis of chat-style coding for this reason. With tools like Claude Code, you are the one tracking what was already built, what interfaces exist, and why something was generated a certain way. I built Ossature[1] around the opposite model. You write specs describing behavior, it audits them for gaps and contradictions before any code is…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641629&quot; title=&quot;Hey, you seem to have similar view on this. I know ideas are cheap but hear me out: You talk with agent A it only modifies this spec, you still chat and can say &amp;#39;make it prettier&amp;#39; but that agent only modifies the spec, the spec could also separate &amp;#39;explicit&amp;#39; from &amp;#39;inferred&amp;#39;. And of course agent B which builds only sees the spec. User actually can care about diffs generated by agent A again, because nobody wants to verify diffs on agents generated code full of repetition and created by search…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642690&quot; title=&quot;Right, the spec/build separation is exactly the idea and Ossature is already built that way on the build side. I agree a dedicated layer for intent capture makes a lot of sense. I thought about that as well, I am just not fully convinced it has to be conversational (or free-form conversational). Writing a prompt to get the right spec change is still a skill in itself, and it feels like it&amp;#39;d just be shifting the problem upstream rather than actually solving it. A structured editing experience…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. However, there is skepticism regarding the performance of open-weight models in these frameworks, with observations that they often fail to match the efficacy of proprietary models like Claude even when using the same harness &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640521&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This is speculative, but I suspect that if we dropped one of the latest, most capable open-weight LLMs, such as GLM-5, into a similar harness, it could likely perform on par with GPT-5.4 in Codex or Claude Opus 4.6 in Claude Code. Unless I&amp;#39;m misunderstanding what&amp;#39;s being described here, running Claude Code with different backend models is pretty common. https://docs.z.ai/scenario-example/develop-tools/claude It doesn&amp;#39;t perform on par with Anthropic&amp;#39;s models in my experience.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640563&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It doesn&amp;#39;t perform on par with Anthropic&amp;#39;s models in my experience. Why do you think that is the case? Is Anthropic&amp;#39;s models just better or do they train the models to somehow work better with the harness?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://thoughts.wyounas.com/p/some-unusual-trees&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Some Unusual Trees&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (thoughts.wyounas.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637287&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;285 points · 85 comments · by simplegeek&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Drawing from the *Encyclopaedia Britannica*, this article highlights extraordinary tree species, including the massive canopy-spreading banyan, the water-storing traveller’s tree, and Pando, a single clonal organism in Utah that spans 106 acres through a connected root system. &lt;a href=&quot;https://thoughts.wyounas.com/p/some-unusual-trees&quot; title=&quot;Some unusual trees    One of my favorite pastimes is exploring old bookstores.    [![Thoughts of an imprint](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!DnE0!,w_40,h_40,c_fill,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fc52785f4-8f52-4c51-b4a9-2db10bc23db1_1024x1024.png)](/)    # [Thoughts of an imprint](/)    SubscribeSign in    # Some unusual trees    [![Waqas Younas&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights the Eucalyptus tree for its &amp;#34;heteroblasty&amp;#34;—the transition from rounded juvenile leaves to lance-like adult leaves—and its invasive traits like allelopathy and extreme flammability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47638549&quot; title=&quot;I would say the Eucalyptus tree, planted all over the world but native to Australia, is quite unusual. Young Eucalyptus trees have leaves that are rounded and are arranged opposite to one another. However, when mature the leaves of a Eucalyptus are lance-like and are arranged in an alternating fashion. This to me is quite unusual.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47638856&quot; title=&quot;True. Although in their native Australia they grew quite straight. It&amp;#39;s the introduced trees that grow not so straight and make bad railroad ties. In areas where they are introduced, they also become quite invasive by practicing something called alelopathy, whereby they introduce toxins into the soil to prevent competing tree species from taking hold. While I&amp;#39;m at it, Eucalyptus trees have very very dense wood which means the wood burns very hot. This makes it even worse for forest fires where…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645225&quot; title=&quot;I agree eucalypts are unusual, I also find them beautiful, especially ones with smooth light bark like Ghost Gum and Citriodora, which has light pinky-orange bark! Such a presence!). I&amp;#39;ve never seen a Rainbow Gum but would love to one day! I live in South Australia and I was surprised to hear about all Eucalypts having &amp;#39;leaf dimorphism&amp;#39; (that is what I searched for, then learned that it&amp;#39;s usually known as &amp;#39;heteroblasty&amp;#39;) I have of course seen it many times in-the-wild, but it is not universal…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant portion of the thread debates the nature of biological classification, noting that &amp;#34;tree&amp;#34; is not a formal phylogenetic group but a convergent growth form, leading to disagreements over whether rigid taxonomies are objective failures or simply context-dependent tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637851&quot; title=&quot;Related: There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically) https://eukaryotewritesblog.com/2021/05/02/theres-no-such-th...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47638025&quot; title=&quot;Thank you! Isn’t it amazing how a rigid hierarchical categorization system fails everywhere you actually look into details?   See also category theory vs prototype theory.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47639036&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s amazing that most people don&amp;#39;t realize it, and even in higher education you get people believing in taxonomies and categories as if they were a property of the natural world. There are no categories in the objective reality, rigid or otherwise; there are no metadata tags attached to elementary particles, that say what the arrangement they&amp;#39;re part of is, and of what type it is. Whether in biology or in code, taxonomies are arbitrary - they&amp;#39;re created by people for some specific purpose, and…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640958&quot; title=&quot;Well, no, what we&amp;#39;re saying here is that if you use a rigid, hierarchical catergorisation system (cladistics) you can say that there is no such monophyletic grouping as a fish. Ie there is no grouping with a common ancestor that encompasses all the things, and only the things, that we commonly call fish. That system hasn&amp;#39;t failed, it&amp;#39;s fine, its purpose is to categorise things in terms of evolutionary descent. However, under that system humans are reptiles and trees and fish aren&amp;#39;t useful…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Contributors also shared anecdotes about the rapid growth of Quandong trees and the fact that tropical trees lack annual growth rings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645295&quot; title=&quot;As someone who grew up with a Quandong in their backyard please don’t plant quandongs without serious planning It grew 40m in ~10 years and spanned ~200-300m^2&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640104&quot; title=&quot;Since we&amp;#39;re talking trees. Only trees that grow in an area with distinct warm/cold cycles have rings, tropical trees don&amp;#39;t and the only way to tell the age of most tropical trees is to have planted it yourself&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://gist.github.com/karpathy/442a6bf555914893e9891c11519de94f&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LLM Wiki – example of an &amp;quot;idea file&amp;quot;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (gist.github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640875&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;276 points · 88 comments · by tamnd&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Andrej Karpathy shared an example of an &amp;#34;idea file&amp;#34; for an LLM Wiki, providing a structured look at how he organizes and documents conceptual projects. &lt;a href=&quot;https://gist.github.com/karpathy/442a6bf555914893e9891c11519de94f&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;x.com&amp;amp;#x2F;karpathy&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2040470801506541998&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;x.com&amp;amp;#x2F;karpathy&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2040470801506541998&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;karpathy&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2040470801506541998&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;karpathy&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2040470801506541998&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether an LLM-managed &amp;#34;idea file&amp;#34; is merely a sophisticated implementation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47644949&quot; title=&quot;This is just RAG. Yes, it&amp;#39;s not using a vector database - but it&amp;#39;s building an index file of semantic connections, it&amp;#39;s constructing hierarchical semantic structures in the filesystem to aid retrieval .. this is RAG. On a sidenote, I&amp;#39;ve been building an AI powered knowledge base (yes, it uses RAG) that has wiki synthesis and similar ideas, take a look at https://github.com/kenforthewin/atomic&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; or a novel form of knowledge synthesis where the AI actively authors, audits, and maintains its own corpus &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645066&quot; title=&quot;eh i&amp;#39;d push back on &amp;#39;just RAG&amp;#39;. like yes the retrieval-generation loop is RAG shaped, no ones arguing that. but the interesting bit here is the write loop - the LLM is authoring and maintaining the wiki itself, building backlinks, filing its own outputs back in. thats not retrieval thats knowledge synthesis. in vanilla RAG your corpus is static, here it isnt also the linting pass is doing something genuinely different - auditing inconsistencies, imputing missing data, suggesting connections.…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that delegating &amp;#34;grunt work&amp;#34; like filing and cross-referencing to AI may lead to &amp;#34;model collapse&amp;#34; and the loss of human &amp;#34;shower thoughts&amp;#34; that emerge during the manual organization of ideas &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645480&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t see why this wouldn&amp;#39;t just lead to model collapse: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07566-y If you&amp;#39;ve spent any time using LLMs to write documentation you&amp;#39;ll see this for yourself: the compounding will just be rewriting valid information with less terse information. I find it concerning Karpathy doesn&amp;#39;t see this. But I&amp;#39;m not surprised, because AI maximalists seem to find it really difficult to be... &amp;#39;normal&amp;#39;? Rule of thumb: if you find yourself needing to broadcast the special…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47644789&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; You never (or rarely) write the wiki yourself — the LLM writes and maintains all of it. You&amp;#39;re in charge of sourcing, exploration, and asking the right questions. The LLM does all the grunt work — the summarizing, cross-referencing, filing, and bookkeeping that makes a knowledge base actually useful over time. I&amp;#39;m not sure how you can get any closer to &amp;#39;turning your thinking over to machines.&amp;#39; These tasks may be &amp;#39;grunt work,&amp;#39; but it&amp;#39;s while doing these things that new ideas pop in, or you…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see this as the realization of 1960s-era visions for man-computer symbiosis &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47644888&quot; title=&quot;This sounds very like Licklider&amp;#39;s essay on Intelligence Amplification: Man Computer Symbiosis, from 1960: &amp;gt; Men will set the goals and supply the motivations, of course, at least in the early years. They will formulate hypotheses. They will ask questions. They will think of mechanisms, procedures, and models. They will remember that such-and-such a person did some possibly relevant work on a topic of interest back in 1947, or at any rate shortly after World War II, and they will have an idea in…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others express concern over &amp;#34;context pollution&amp;#34; and the potential for smart individuals to lose their human faculties by relying on AI-generated &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; for communication &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645480&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t see why this wouldn&amp;#39;t just lead to model collapse: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07566-y If you&amp;#39;ve spent any time using LLMs to write documentation you&amp;#39;ll see this for yourself: the compounding will just be rewriting valid information with less terse information. I find it concerning Karpathy doesn&amp;#39;t see this. But I&amp;#39;m not surprised, because AI maximalists seem to find it really difficult to be... &amp;#39;normal&amp;#39;? Rule of thumb: if you find yourself needing to broadcast the special…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47644398&quot; title=&quot;Too much context pollution. Start with short text context, and flow through DAGs via choose your own adventure. We alreadybreached context limits. Nows the time to  let LLMs build their contexts through decision trees and prune dead ends.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47646185&quot; title=&quot;Edit for context: the sibling comment from karpathy is gone after being flagged to oblivion. Not sure if he deleted it or if it was just removed based on the number of flags? He had copy-pasted a few snarky responses from Claude and essentially said “Claude has this to say to you:” followed by a super long run on paragraph of slop. ———— Wow, I respect karpathy so much and have learned a ton from him. But WTF is the sibling comment he wrote as a response to you? Just pasting a Claude-written…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.npr.org/2026/04/04/nx-s1-5773354/legal-sports-betting-research-credit-bankruptcy&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;When legal sports betting surges, so do Americans&amp;#39; financial problems&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (npr.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47639727&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;215 points · 143 comments · by pseudolus&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;New research from the New York Federal Reserve and other studies link the rise of legal online sports betting to significant financial strain, including a 10% spike in credit delinquencies among bettors and increased rates of bankruptcy and debt collection. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.npr.org/2026/04/04/nx-s1-5773354/legal-sports-betting-research-credit-bankruptcy&quot; title=&quot;When legal sports betting surges, so do Americans&amp;#39; financial problems    As online betting has grown in popularity, a new report from the New York Federal Reserve builds on the troubling link between legal sports wagering and financial health.    Accessibility links    * [Skip to main content](#mainContent)  * [Keyboard shortcuts for audio player](https://help.npr.org/contact/s/article?name=what-are-the-keyboard-shortcuts-for-using-the-npr-org-audio-player)    * Open Navigation Menu  * [![NPR…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rapid legalization and aggressive advertising of sports betting since 2018 has sparked a debate over personal liberty versus the predatory nature of the industry &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641033&quot; title=&quot;remember when gambling was illegal? and the idea of advertising gambling on television wasn&amp;#39;t even something conceivable? and, even more so, the idea that sports entertainment channels would be directly involved in the operation of gambling of was just completely beyond comprehension? ahhh, the remote, halcyon, bygone days of 2018...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642489&quot; title=&quot;Remember when alcohol was illegal? Ahh, the remote, halcyon, bygone days of the 1920s. How about we treat adults like they&amp;#39;re adults and let them make their own choices?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that adults should be free to make their own choices, others highlight how platforms use algorithms and &amp;#34;concierges&amp;#34; to identify and exploit addicts, who can account for up to 70% of a company&amp;#39;s profits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642489&quot; title=&quot;Remember when alcohol was illegal? Ahh, the remote, halcyon, bygone days of the 1920s. How about we treat adults like they&amp;#39;re adults and let them make their own choices?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641979&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; A 2024 Wall Street Journal report, for example, found that 70% of the profits from one online gambling company came from less than 1% of its users. Betting platforms assign highly profitable customers &amp;#39;concierges&amp;#39; who reach out and prompt them to gamble, offer incentives, and work to keep them betting. It&amp;#39;s insidious and wrong - the platforms actively identify and take advantage of addicts. For most, a lottery ticket or an online bet is just buying entertainment - not much different from a…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47643271&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Betting platforms assign highly profitable customers &amp;#39;concierges&amp;#39; who reach out and prompt them to gamble, offer incentives, and work to keep them betting. It&amp;#39;s insidious and wrong - the platforms actively identify and take advantage of addicts. this isn&amp;#39;t new. a relative is an MVP at a casino she dumps cash into. The pit bosses comp all of her meals and call her on days that she doesn&amp;#39;t show up. It&amp;#39;s all sold to the customer as friendly-people-who-care and the people eat that up, especially…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics suggest that for many, gambling has become a &amp;#34;rational&amp;#34; but desperate response to systemic economic stagnation, while proponents of regulation compare the societal harm to that of drunk driving &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642548&quot; title=&quot;I guess you also think we need to stop policing drunk driving? Because the reasons for regulating gambling are similar.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641385&quot; title=&quot;Gambling seems like a rational choice, when all the ”traditional” rational choices just lead into a mountain of student debt, not being able to afford a home, and general failure to launch Summed up very nicely in https://oldcoinbad.com/p/long-degeneracy&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642652&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s quite a straw man. Drunk driving is and should be illegal because it puts the lives of others at risk. Alcohol is legal because it only puts the health of the drinker at risk. Generally in a free society we accept that adults should be free to make decisions that harm only themselves.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/love2d/love&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LÖVE: 2D Game Framework for Lua&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637377&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;255 points · 101 comments · by cl3misch&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LÖVE is a free, open-source 2D game framework for Lua that supports Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/love2d/love&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - love2d/love: LÖVE is an awesome 2D game framework for Lua.    URL Source: https://github.com/love2d/love    Markdown Content:  # GitHub - love2d/love: LÖVE is an awesome 2D game framework for Lua. · GitHub    [Skip to content](https://github.com/love2d/love#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [](https://github.com/)    [Sign in](https://github.com/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Flove2d%2Flove)    Appearance settings    *     Platform        *     AI CODE CREATION  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LÖVE is praised for its smooth developer experience and simple APIs, highlighted by the success of the indie hit *Balatro* &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653240&quot; title=&quot;One of the biggest recent indie hits, Balatro, was made in Löve! I really like it, the developer experience is so smooth for beginners, just drag a zip onto the exe and it starts. And the APIs are simple enough to memorize while allowing pretty cool rendering stuff.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Multiple users noted that *Balatro* ships with unobfuscated source code, leading several players to independently verify the game&amp;#39;s RNG logic after experiencing bad luck &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653346&quot; title=&quot;Balatro ships with the entire unobfuscated Lua source by the way. I once checked if the odds stated on a card were implemented wrong. Turns out no, the code checks out, I&amp;#39;m just that unlucky.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653423&quot; title=&quot;hahaha, I did the exact same thing after the game came out to see if wheel of fortune was really a 1/4 chance&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653726&quot; title=&quot;lol, love seeing that I&amp;#39;m not the only one who did this. Being suspicious of WoF was the first and last time I peeked at the Balatro source.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate the performance of Lua compared to highly optimized web engines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653206&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve used this for many projects that are still working to this day. That said, i&amp;#39;m not impressed. A web-based solution is usually better performing, despite all the bloatware necessary. This says a lot about the state of software development unfortunately.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653439&quot; title=&quot;They are saying web based solutions often out perform LÖVE, even though you would expect the opposite because LÖVE doesn&amp;#39;t have the bloat of a browser engine.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653546&quot; title=&quot;Browser engines are probably some of the most optimized pieces of software in existence, so it doesn&amp;#39;t surprise me at all.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest using SDL2 bindings in different languages if Lua is not preferred &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47653257&quot; title=&quot;Btw, Love2D is based on SDL2. If you hate Lua but needs the same cross-platform capabilities, you can use an SDL2 binding in other languages or make your own.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47654575&quot; title=&quot;Now why would you hate lua of all things?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/iranian-missile-blitz-takes-down-aws-data-centers-in-bahrain-and-dubai-amazon-declares-hard-down-status-for-multiple-zones&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Iranian missile blitz takes down AWS data centers in Bahrain and Dubai&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tomshardware.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641788&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;184 points · 157 comments · by lschueller&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Iranian missile and drone strikes have knocked out AWS data centers in Bahrain and Dubai, prompting Amazon to declare a &amp;#34;hard down&amp;#34; status for multiple compute zones and migrate workloads to other regions as the ongoing conflict threatens the broader semiconductor supply chain. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/iranian-missile-blitz-takes-down-aws-data-centers-in-bahrain-and-dubai-amazon-declares-hard-down-status-for-multiple-zones&quot; title=&quot;Iranian missile blitz takes down AWS data centers in Bahrain and Dubai — Amazon reportedly declares “hard down” status for multiple zones    Iranian strikes are taking out AWS servers in the region.    [Skip to main content](#main)    Open menu    [![Tom&amp;#39;s Hardware](/media/img/brand_logo.svg)  Tom&amp;#39;s Hardware](https://www.tomshardware.com)    US Edition  ![flag of US](https://vanilla.futurecdn.net/tomshardware/media/shared/img/flags/nosize/US.svg)    [![UK…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the strategic and logistical logic of maintaining data centers in the Middle East, with some users questioning the efficiency of cooling infrastructure in the desert &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642591&quot; title=&quot;Not to be insensitive about the humanitarian and economic situation, but, I am curious why there are data centers in that region at all?  It just seems horribly inefficient from a cooling and electricity standpoint.  Not to mention water. My pessimistic assumption is that Amazon said &amp;#39;yes&amp;#39; to handouts from regional government efforts to be relevant in tech, and that those data centers dont really matter to anyone but local politicians and monarchs who believe they have a seat at the table.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; while others argue that the region&amp;#39;s immense wealth and digital demand necessitate local hubs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47643333&quot; title=&quot;Middle East isn’t some 3rd world. If you can imagine futuristic cities, rich Middle East countries are already living in them with all the oil wealth. They have phones, computers, digital services just like the US and Europe. Makes sense they want a data center in the region, close to them just like the US and Europe have data enters close to their users.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters disagree on the definition of &amp;#34;futuristic&amp;#34; cities, debating whether the term applies to the car-centric, oil-wealthy architecture of Dubai or the human-centric urbanism of Europe &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47643388&quot; title=&quot;Slight tangent, but to me futuristic cities are actually places like Amsterdam, with cozy streets and bike lanes everywhere, not places like Dubai with 16-lane freeways and a quasi-slave underclass staffing the tacky malls.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47644012&quot; title=&quot;Its sad that people think the &amp;#39;future&amp;#39; is all about owning stuff for yourself and not what the city can provide to its population.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Regarding the conflict, users analyze Iran&amp;#39;s strategy as an attempt to demonstrate that U.S. military protection is insufficient, thereby pressuring regional allies to distance themselves from American and Israeli interests &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47643194&quot; title=&quot;I do think there is some irony that the Iran war took down all the AWS datacenters in the middle east except the one (or 3 i guess) in Israel, which is still chugging along. Like as a strategy its kind of weird. Iran plans to force Israel to stop by wrecking the economies of a bunch of countries that are basically frenemies of Israel? I suppose its meant to pressure USA, it just seems like a terrible strategy.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47643417&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s supposed to show to regional US allies that the American military cannot really protect them, pushing them to apply pressure to end the war in the short term, and to cool their relationship with the US and Israel in the long term. It has had some effect; the emirates are desperate to find a way out of this conflict, and various figures have publicly said &amp;#39;the system of alliances [with the US] has worked but needs to be modernized&amp;#39; - i.e. we can&amp;#39;t allow Americans to do what they want…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47644025&quot; title=&quot;You need to think that all the way through. The answer is obviously yes. Yemen is a perfect example. Iran is obviously as well. Afghanistan another great case. It is certainly possible to resist US pressure. Iran is asking the gulf countries to do that. Imagine how much better they would all  be able to resist the US together as well, better than each alone.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/OneUptime/blog/commit/30cd2384794c897d95aca77d173db44af51ca849&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;12k AI-generated blog posts added in a single commit&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640722&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;143 points · 143 comments · by noslop&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A single GitHub commit to the OneUptime/blog repository added 12,000 AI-generated blog posts, covering technical topics such as ClickHouse, Redis, and MongoDB. The massive update includes configuration guides, troubleshooting runbooks, and tutorials, modifying over 5,000 files to complete a comprehensive list of database and infrastructure topics. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/OneUptime/blog/commit/30cd2384794c897d95aca77d173db44af51ca849&quot; title=&quot;Add 12,000 blog posts covering ClickHouse, Redis, MongoDB, MySQL, Roo… · OneUptime/blog@30cd238    …k/Ceph, and Dapr Complete all topics from Todo.md including SQL functions, configuration guides, troubleshooting runbooks, architecture comparisons, SDK tutorials, and operator deployment pattern...    [Skip to content](#start-of-content)    ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The sudden influx of 12,000 AI-generated blog posts in a single repository has sparked concerns that the &amp;#34;dead Internet theory&amp;#34; is becoming a reality, as low-quality automated content threatens to dominate search results &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640934&quot; title=&quot;If the dead Internet theory wasn&amp;#39;t true before, it sure will be soon.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641622&quot; title=&quot;You should care because this website has a high ranking on Google and these 12000 posts will show up every time you search something programming related.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Users shared anecdotes of being misled by highly convincing AI-generated agricultural advice, audiobooks, and deepfaked educational videos, noting that it is increasingly difficult to distinguish hallucinated &amp;#34;nothings&amp;#34; from trustworthy information &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641942&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s becoming much harder to determine on a daily basis what content is original, thought-out by a person, and trustworthy. Ironically, verifiably-old content is easier to trust now. Examples from recent personal experience: 1) Some time ago I was searching for growing information about a specific and uncommonly-grown plant, and was led to a top-ranked website with long pages containing everything about it, including other plants. Surprised at how prolific the writing was, I spent more than an…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that readers should judge information by its own merit rather than its source &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642469&quot; title=&quot;You&amp;#39;re making the classic mistake of looking for a trustworthy information source and then trusting it, instead of focusing on whether the information itself is trustworthy regardless of source. It&amp;#39;s literally the same as my grandma saying &amp;#39;they said so on TV, therefore it must be true&amp;#39; while completely dismissing anything I&amp;#39;ve read on the internet because reasons. If you develop the skill of judging information by its merit rather than source, you won&amp;#39;t mind AI-generated content as long as…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others believe this trend will force a return to older ranking algorithms based on trusted links or drive people toward tighter-knit, authenticated communities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641433&quot; title=&quot;I suspect we&amp;#39;ll address this by just going back to older ranking algorithms for search. We&amp;#39;ll go back to the primary signal of good content being links from trusted sources. People gaming the content based algorithms will eventually cause their own downfall.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641547&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s kinda exciting. The social media status quo has its upsides but a lot of downsides. I&amp;#39;m hopeful that the change will be good. We&amp;#39;ll have to figure out a way to authenticate the people we&amp;#39;re talking to, which will encourage tighter-knit communities.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641590&quot; title=&quot;This will end with the only way to authenticate the people we&amp;#39;re talking to is meeting them at the coffeeshop in the morning.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sllm.cloud&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: sllm – Split a GPU node with other developers, unlimited tokens&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sllm.cloud)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47639779&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;179 points · 89 comments · by jrandolf&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sllm is a new service that allows developers to share the cost of dedicated GPU nodes, providing private, OpenAI-compatible access to large models like DeepSeek V3 starting at $5 per month. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sllm.cloud&quot; title=&quot;Running DeepSeek V3 (685B) requires 8×H100 GPUs which is about $14k&amp;amp;#x2F;month. Most developers only need 15-25 tok&amp;amp;#x2F;s. sllm lets you join a cohort of developers sharing a dedicated node. You reserve a spot with your card, and nobody is charged until the cohort fills. Prices start at $5&amp;amp;#x2F;mo for smaller models.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;The LLMs are completely private (we don&amp;amp;#x27;t log any traffic).&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;The API is OpenAI-compatible (we run vLLM), so you just swap the base URL. Currently offering a few models.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The service offers a shared GPU node for $10/month to provide unlimited LLM access, positioning itself as a cost-effective alternative to token-based pricing for 24/7 usage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642579&quot; title=&quot;24/7 LLM for $10/month.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641259&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; 25 t/s is barely usable. Maybe for a background runner That&amp;#39;s over a 1000 words/s if you were typing. If 1000 words/s is too slow  for your use-case, then perhaps $5/m is just not for you. I kinda like the idea of paying $5/m for unlimited usage at the specified speed. It beats a 10x higher speed that hits daily restrictions in about 2 hours, and weekly restrictions in 3 days.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, users expressed significant concerns regarding resource contention and fairness, questioning how the system handles &amp;#34;noisy neighbors&amp;#34; or users attempting to hog resources for large data processing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641080&quot; title=&quot;This is an excellent idea, but I worry about fairness during resource contention.  I don&amp;#39;t often need queries, but when I do it&amp;#39;s often big and long.  I wouldn&amp;#39;t want to eat up the whole system when other users need it, but I also would want to have the cluster when I need it.  How do you address a case like this?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640910&quot; title=&quot;1. Is the given tok/s estimate for the total node throughput, or is it what you can realistically expect to get? Or is it the worst case scenario throughput if everyone starts to use it simultaneously? 2. What if I try to hog all resources of a node by running some large data processing and making multiple queries in parallel? What if I try to resell the access by charging per token? Edit: sorry if this comment sounds overly critical. I think that pooling money with other developers to…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While the developer points to rate-limiting and off-peak performance boosts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641279&quot; title=&quot;We implement rate-limiting and queuing to ensure fairness, but if there are a massive amount of people with huge and long queries, then there will be waits. The question is whether people will do this and more often than not users will be idle.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47643690&quot; title=&quot;20 tok/s is an average. It can be more, it can be less. If you are running off-peak I&amp;#39;m sure you&amp;#39;d get some crazy number.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, critics argue the math may favor providers like OpenRouter for typical workloads and that the 20-25 tokens per second speed may be too slow for interactive use &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47643623&quot; title=&quot;Isn&amp;#39;t this a bad deal? Or is there an error in my math? For $40, I&amp;#39;d get 20 tok/s * 2.6M seconds per month = 52M tokens of DeepSeek v3.2 per month if I run it 24/7, which is not realistic for most workloads. On OpenRouter [1], $40 buys 105M tokens from the same model, which is more than 52M tokens, and I can freely choose when to use them. [1]: https://openrouter.ai/deepseek/deepseek-v3.2&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47641031&quot; title=&quot;25 t/s is barely usable. Maybe for a background runner&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter/discussions/8627&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Nvim-treesitter (13K+ Stars) is Archived&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47644667&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;161 points · 76 comments · by RohanAdwankar&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The maintainer of the popular Neovim plugin **nvim-treesitter** archived the repository on April 3, 2026, following a heated discussion regarding the project&amp;#39;s lack of stable releases and its sudden decision to drop support for older versions of Neovim. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter/discussions/8627&quot; title=&quot;Title: Why there are no releases? · nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter · Discussion #8627    URL Source: https://github.com/nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter/discussions/8627    Markdown Content:  # Why there are no releases? · nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter · Discussion #8627 · GitHub    [Skip to content](https://github.com/nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter/discussions/8627#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [](https://github.com/)    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The archiving of Nvim-treesitter was catalyzed by &amp;#34;entitled&amp;#34; and rude user behavior, which commenters suggest may have been the final straw for maintainers already near a breaking point &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47646831&quot; title=&quot;I will never understand people like GitHub user “shushtain” in the linked issue. So obviously the guy is behaving like an entitled jerk, but it’s also surely counter-productive (volunteer maintainers are unlikely to respond well to plain rudeness)? Unless the goal isn’t a productive outcome, but just to be mean?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47646691&quot; title=&quot;This was probably near the breaking point before, it just needed an idiot to catalyze.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While one user argues that such rudeness often stems from &amp;#34;passionate&amp;#34; users whose feedback can drive growth, others counter that this perspective applies to businesses and is irrelevant to the unique anxieties and pressures of unpaid open-source volunteer work &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647114&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve built many successful services by listening to entitled users so much that I used to talk with such entitled users all day. They are just passionate and most of the times annoyed because something as simple is not being done right.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647337&quot; title=&quot;I built businesses not opensource projects. Though many of my projects are completely free for the users. Latest being this one already past 1000+ active users https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.macrocodex... If you don&amp;#39;t listen to your passionate users, i doubt you&amp;#39;ll ever grow. Someone being rude/entitled doesn&amp;#39;t matter to me, I only care about if what they are saying actually makes any sense&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647385&quot; title=&quot;Don&amp;#39;t take it personally but the people here are talking about open source projects and unpaid work in their free spare time. There is zero value you could share in this thread from your experiences on developing closed source business products because it completely misses the topic of volunteer work.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. To cope with this environment, some developers report deleting accounts or keeping repositories archived by default to eliminate the stress of public interaction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647648&quot; title=&quot;I had a similar emotional outburst where after contributing hundreds of hours to Stack Overflow, when I asked a question of my own, instead of answering an objective yes/no question people just argued with me in the comments about why I could possibly want to do whatever prompted me to ask my question. I delete my account and quit ever contributing to that site right then and there. I think I was just looking for an out and it was ultimately a good thing. No idea if this is the case here, but I…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647191&quot; title=&quot;The one GitHub repository of original work I publish right now is kept in Archived at rest; I unarchive it to push commits and then rearchive it, every time. It has been perfectly quiet and my anxiety associated with working on it has dropped to zero. Highly recommended.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://iii.social&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Indie Internet Index – submit your favorite sites&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (iii.social)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47639291&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;183 points · 32 comments · by freshman_dev&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Indie Internet Index is a community-driven directory and search engine designed to help users discover independent websites, personal blogs, and creative digital projects. &lt;a href=&quot;https://iii.social&quot; title=&quot;Title: Indie Internet Index    URL Source: https://iii.social/    Published Time: Sun, 05 Apr 2026 03:03:37 GMT    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1](https://www.fallingdowncat.com/content/images/size/w1200/2026/02/publication-cover.jpg)    [Falling Down Cat](https://fallingdowncat.com/)    fallingdowncat.com    Archive of old and new projects in a form of a blog posts.    Collection of embedded projects, and an attempt at research. Blog    [MANIPULATE](https://manipulate.io/)    manipulate.io    Exploring social…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users appreciate the project as a way to surface the personal web, others criticize its lack of transparency regarding &amp;#34;indie&amp;#34; criteria, its reliance on JavaScript, and the requirement of an email address to submit sites &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47642764&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think there is anything wrong with overlapping other projects, particularly when it&amp;#39;s about surfacing the personal web.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47644481&quot; title=&quot;I can&amp;#39;t seem to find the rules. How do I know if my site is in scope here? It it like Kagi&amp;#39;s small web that&amp;#39;s only for blogs, or does it need to be run by a &amp;lt;10-person company, or like what means &amp;#39;indie&amp;#39; here? Viewing the submit page requires an email address and bugmenot@bugmenot.com does not work&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47644963&quot; title=&quot;Ah yes, the indie internet index, which does not load without javascript and has no source code linked.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong consensus that the &amp;#34;small web&amp;#34; space is becoming crowded, leading to suggestions that a meta-directory is now necessary to track the numerous existing indices and webrings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47643588&quot; title=&quot;Great to see another IndieWeb project on the HN front page. The more the merrier.  At this point, it almost feels like we need a meta-directory to keep track of them all.  For others like me who are fond of these projects, here are a few other directories and indices worth checking out: https://blogroll.org/ https://blogs.hn/ (by @surprisetalk) https://hnpwd.github.io/ (I am one of the maintainers) https://indieblog.page/ (by @splitbrain) https://kagi.com/smallweb/ (by @freediver)…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640896&quot; title=&quot;Am I missing something? This doesn&amp;#39;t seem to be an &amp;#39;index&amp;#39; at all. The name &amp;#39;index&amp;#39; made me think its trying to accomplish what marginalia is already doing https://marginalia-search.com/ And stuff like Gossip&amp;#39;s Web has been around for a decade now https://gossipsweb.net/ IndieWeb also has a massive &amp;#39;web ring&amp;#39; that has a similar aim https://xn--sr8hvo.ws/&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. To this end, contributors shared several alternative discovery tools, including Marginalia, Wiby, and various blogroll aggregators &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47643588&quot; title=&quot;Great to see another IndieWeb project on the HN front page. The more the merrier.  At this point, it almost feels like we need a meta-directory to keep track of them all.  For others like me who are fond of these projects, here are a few other directories and indices worth checking out: https://blogroll.org/ https://blogs.hn/ (by @surprisetalk) https://hnpwd.github.io/ (I am one of the maintainers) https://indieblog.page/ (by @splitbrain) https://kagi.com/smallweb/ (by @freediver)…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47646103&quot; title=&quot;Slashpages often have a directory where you can discover new indie websites. Also fun to add those slashpages to your own website. https://slashpages.net&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645501&quot; title=&quot;I recently built a Small Web Discovery feature for the WebLibre Android browser that unifies multiple sources (currently only Wander and Kagi Small Web). The feature is still very alpha, in the upcoming weeks I will look into adding more sources. Documentation here: https://docs.weblibre.eu/weblibre/small-web.html and there are some screenshots in this Wander issue: https://codeberg.org/susam/wander/issues/11&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-04-03</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-04-03</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/apr/03/us-fighter-jet-confirmed-shot-down-over-iran&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;F-15E jet shot down over Iran&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theguardian.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628326&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;605 points · &lt;strong&gt;1384 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by tjwds&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Pentagon has confirmed that a U.S. F-15E Strike Eagle fighter jet was shot down over Iranian territory, with debris from the aircraft appearing in verified footage. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/apr/03/us-fighter-jet-confirmed-shot-down-over-iran&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;theaviationist.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;04&amp;amp;#x2F;03&amp;amp;#x2F;iran-f-15e-debris&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;theaviationist.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;04&amp;amp;#x2F;03&amp;amp;#x2F;iran-f-15e-debris&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The loss of an F-15E and an A-10 over Iran has sparked debate over the effectiveness of U.S. air superiority, with some arguing that these losses are alarming given Iran&amp;#39;s degraded defenses compared to historical precedents like the Gulf War &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628808&quot; title=&quot;During the entire gulf war (Iraq, 1990-91), only two F-15s were shot down via surface-to-air engagement. At the time, Baghdad was known to have the highest density of SAM protection out of any city in the world. An F-15 being shot down in Iran after weeks of strategic bombing of their anti-air defense systems is not a good sign.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47630603&quot; title=&quot;New reporting that an A-10 ~was also shot down~ has also gone down (unconfirmed if it was shot down) https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/04/03/world/iran-war-trump... &amp;gt; A second Air Force combat plane crashed in the Persian Gulf region on Friday, and the lone pilot was safely rescued, according to two U.S. officials who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss operational matters.  The A-10 Warthog attack plane went down near the Strait of Hormuz about the same time that an Air Force F-15E was…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters view the low number of losses after weeks of bombing as a sign of success &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47630757&quot; title=&quot;By that same logic that fact that we only lost 1 F-15 in, what, almost 3 weeks of bombing is actually a pretty good sign. Especially when you factor in that the Russians (proven) and Chinese (yet to be proven) are assisting Iran and Iran has been buying and building all of this military infrastructure at the expense of living conditions for its people just for this very attack, only to have almost everything obliterated. And 3 weeks in to the war and the US is flying refueling tankers to refuel…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others point to the lack of &amp;#34;backdoor&amp;#34; access to Iranian systems and the destruction of billion-dollar radar assets as evidence of a much more capable and resilient adversary &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47630001&quot; title=&quot;In the first Iraq war, the KARI system in Iraq, which was built by Thompson-CSF, had its specifications leaked and the US obtained access to back doors and codes that allowed it to bypass and/or disable much of that system. You need to remember that the US and much of the West had friendly relations with Iraq and provided some infrastructure assistance and military support because Iraq invaded Iran. No such analogous advantage exists in Iran, which is a much larger country, with better air…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47631544&quot; title=&quot;Not to mention the multiple THAAD radars taken offline. Those are $500M assets - and only 8 exist in the world. 24,000 precise transceivers all liquid cooled… not available on Amazon for next day deliver either.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47631654&quot; title=&quot;a single AN/FPS-132 radar costs $1.1 bln, not $500m. And Iran stuck 17 of the CENCCOM sites hosting radars of all kinds across Qarar, Bahrain, Iraq, UAE, Saudi, Jordan, Israel, etc). Total cost is so much bigger, it is staggering. The whole CENTCOM is blind basically, as well as Iron Dome which relied on these radars - all blind now, in addition to long-range early nuke detection to protect CONUS is also blind. in addition to cost, they all require Rare Earth Minerals, and China has banned the…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant concern regarding the vulnerability of search-and-rescue operations and the potential for American hostages to complicate the conflict further &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47630603&quot; title=&quot;New reporting that an A-10 ~was also shot down~ has also gone down (unconfirmed if it was shot down) https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/04/03/world/iran-war-trump... &amp;gt; A second Air Force combat plane crashed in the Persian Gulf region on Friday, and the lone pilot was safely rescued, according to two U.S. officials who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss operational matters.  The A-10 Warthog attack plane went down near the Strait of Hormuz about the same time that an Air Force F-15E was…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47627589&quot; title=&quot;Military aviators train for this, being alone behind enemy lines (look up SERE school if you’re curious, one of the craziest training courses outside of special forces) and there is a special force just for aviator recovery behind enemy lines, US AirForce Pararescue. Hopefully they’ll get the aviators back quickly, the last thing our country needs is American hostages making this ridiculous war harder to stop.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47633396&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tell HN: Anthropic no longer allowing Claude Code subscriptions to use OpenClaw&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47633396&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1075 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 821 comments · by firloop&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic will stop allowing Claude subscribers to use their monthly limits for third-party harnesses like OpenClaw starting April 4, requiring a separate pay-as-you-go billing option to manage system demand. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47633396&quot; title=&quot;Received the following email from Anthropic:&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Hi,&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Starting April 4 at 12pm PT &amp;amp;#x2F; 8pm BST, you’ll no longer be able to use your Claude subscription limits for third-party harnesses including OpenClaw. You can still use them with your Claude account, but they will require extra usage, a pay-as-you-go option billed separately from your subscription.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Your subscription still covers all Claude products, including Claude Code and Claude Cowork. To keep using third-party harnesses with your…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic’s decision to ban OpenClaw stems from a conflict between &amp;#34;unlimited&amp;#34; subscription models and autonomous agents that maximize token usage far beyond typical human patterns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47633987&quot; title=&quot;There seem to be a ton of people who don&amp;#39;t understand how subscription services work. Every single one of them oversells their capacity. The power users that use the services a lot are subsidized by those who don&amp;#39;t use it as much, which tends to be the vast majority of the user base. OpenClaw is an autonomous power user. The growing adoption of this walking attack surface was either going to A) cause the cost of Claude to go up or B) get banned to protect the price of the service for actual…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47634445&quot; title=&quot;You aren&amp;#39;t paying to be using that limit all of the time. You are paying to be using that limit some of the time.  There are 5 hour windows when you are sleeping and can&amp;#39;t use it.  There are weekend limits. Theoretically you can max out every 5 hour window, but they lose money on that. It&amp;#39;s structured so users can have bursts of unlimited usage, and spend ~15% of the theoretical max cap, and that&amp;#39;s still cheaper than a subscription for that user. An OpenClaw user can use 6, 7, 8 times what a…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this is a necessary move to prevent power users from subsidizing their high costs at the expense of others, critics suggest it is a strategic attempt to lock users into Anthropic’s own tools by restricting third-party harnesses &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47634313&quot; title=&quot;What you&amp;#39;re saying is conceptually true for subscription services in general, but thats not why they are making this change. There&amp;#39;s a 5 hour limit and a weekly limit. Those are hard token limits. Everyone on a plan pays for the max set of tokens in that plan. The limits manage capacity. The solution to that isn&amp;#39;t a change of ToS, it&amp;#39;s adjusting the limits. In other words this is about Anthropic subsidizing their own tools to keep people on their platform. OpenClaw is just a good cover story…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47633867&quot; title=&quot;This is slightly different from what OpenCode was banned from doing; they were a separate harness grabbing a user’s Claude Code session and pretending to be Claude Code. OpenClaw was still using Claude Code as the harness (via claude -p)[0]. I understand why Anthropic is doing this (and they’ve made it clear that building products around claude -p is disallowed) but I fear Conductor will be next. [0]: See “Option B: Claude CLI as the message provider” here…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47634860&quot; title=&quot;This is how free drink refills,  airplane tickets, Internet service, unlimited data plans, insurance, flat rate shipping, monthly transit passes, Netflix, Apple Music, gym memberships, museum memberships, car wash plans, amusement park passes, all you can eat buffets, news subscriptions, and many more work. Either you get a flat rate fee based on certain allowed usage patterns or everyone has to be billed à la carte.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The change has prompted some users to consider downgrading to cheaper API-based models or local LLMs to avoid inconsistent rate limits and the high costs of premium tiers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47634002&quot; title=&quot;My answer to this is simply rolling back to the pro plan for interactive usage in the coming month, and forcefully cutting myself over to one of the alternative Chinese models to just get over the hump and normalise API pricing at a sensible rate with sensible semantics. Dealing with Claude going into stupid mode 15 times a day, constant HTTP errors, etc. just isn&amp;#39;t really worth it for all it does. I can&amp;#39;t see myself justifying $200/mo. on any replacement tool either, the output just doesn&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47634802&quot; title=&quot;I feel like Anthropic is going down a bad path here with billing things this way. Especially as local LLM continues to develop so fast. I downgraded from my $200 a month plan to my $20 plan and hit limits constantly. I try to use the API access I purchased separately, and it doesn&amp;#39;t work with Claude Code (something about the 1 million context requiring extra usage) so I have to use it Continue. Then I get instantly rate limited when it&amp;#39;s trying to read 1-2 files. It just sucks. This whole…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47633625&quot; title=&quot;Just give me a subscription tier where I’m not being blocked out every afternoon. Im hitting rate limits within 1:45 during afternoons. I can’t justify extra usage since it’s a variable cost, but I can justify a higher subscription tier.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce8jzr423p9o&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47631118&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1060 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 378 comments · by andsoitis&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Artemis II crew captured a high-resolution image of Earth from the Orion spacecraft during their mission to orbit the Moon. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce8jzr423p9o&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.nasa.gov&amp;amp;#x2F;image-detail&amp;amp;#x2F;fd02_for-pao&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.nasa.gov&amp;amp;#x2F;image-detail&amp;amp;#x2F;fd02_for-pao&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Technical analysis of the image&amp;#39;s EXIF data reveals it was captured using a Nikon D5 at ISO 51200 with a 1/4 second shutter speed, leading to discussions about the impressive lack of motion blur and the high level of sensor noise &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632457&quot; title=&quot;Looking at the EXIF (with exiftool) for the image uploaded by NASA ( https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/art002e00019... ), apparently this was taken by a Nikon D5 with an AF-S Zoom-Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED and developed with Lightroom. It also seems like very little was done in Lightroom. Amazing...  I dumped the whole EXIF here: https://gist.github.com/umgefahren/a6f555e6588a98adb74eed79d...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632914&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d have probably shot it wide open at f/2.8 rather than cranking the ISO up to 51200. Incredibly impressed at the steady hands for a sharp image at 1/4 s shutter speed though! Maybe they just let the camera float in space with the mirror up, triggering it remotely.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47631852&quot; title=&quot;It explains why the image is so grainy. At first I was confused what that stripe to the left and the bottom was. But it’s just the window edge, and the noise isn’t stars.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Users noted that the photo uniquely depicts a moonlit nightside Earth, which mimics dayside colors but allows for the visibility of stars and planets like Venus due to the long exposure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47631817&quot; title=&quot;I was confused when I first saw this photo, as I don&amp;#39;t think I&amp;#39;ve ever before seen a nightside, moonlit Earth, exposed so that it looks like the dayside at a first glance. I wonder how many casual viewers actually realize it&amp;#39;s the night side. A nice demonstration of how moonlight is pretty much exactly like sunlight, just much much dimmer. In particular it has the same color, even though moonlight is often thought of as bluish and sunlight as yellowish!&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632013&quot; title=&quot;(To be clear, the bright dots are stars [except the brightest one, in the lower right, is Venus I think], which makes this photo also a great demonstration that of course you can capture stars in space, you just have to expose properly!)&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debated the extent of post-processing in Lightroom compared to the raw NASA assets, others jokingly anticipated flat-earth conspiracies or lightheartedly complained about being photographed without a model release &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47631675&quot; title=&quot;Come on flat-earthers. I know you are out there. Lets hear your crazy rant about how this is a fisheye lens on a weather balloon or a webcam atop the eiffel tower. Why can&amp;#39;t we see the poles? And is that an ice wall on poking up in the lower-right quadrant of the disk?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632553&quot; title=&quot;Before Lightroom it might have looked closer to this: https://images-assets.nasa.gov/image/art002e000193/art002e00...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47631889&quot; title=&quot;I object to being included in this image without a model release and demand that pixel be removed.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47633270&quot; title=&quot;But that one (art002e000193~large.jpg) is only 287kB. The Lightroom-processed one is 6.2MB. I would expect original to be heavier.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://text.blogosphere.app/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: I built a frontpage for personal blogs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (text.blogosphere.app)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47625952&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;769 points · 193 comments · by ramkarthikk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Blogosphere is a new platform designed to support the indie web by aggregating and highlighting recent posts from personal blogs across various categories in both minimal and standard formats. &lt;a href=&quot;https://text.blogosphere.app/&quot; title=&quot;With social media and now AI, its important to keep the indie web alive. There are many people who write frequently. Blogosphere tries to highlight them by fetching the recent posts from personal blogs across many categories.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;There are two versions:  Minimal (HN-inspired, fast, static): &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;text.blogosphere.app&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;text.blogosphere.app&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;  Non-minimal: &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;blogosphere.app&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of AI-generated content and declining search quality has sparked a &amp;#34;regression&amp;#34; toward hand-curated blog aggregators and webrings reminiscent of the early internet &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47626123&quot; title=&quot;Incredible that we are regressing back to webrings and hand-curated lists like this, both of which I remember well. That&amp;#39;s not a criticism! I guess that the quality-drop in search wasn&amp;#39;t quite enough to make it happen, but the advent of AI content predomination will be.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47626850&quot; title=&quot;I think we&amp;#39;re going to reinvent Google&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;circles&amp;#39; mechanism from G+. We all (well, the terminally online, at least) are going to be part of several more or less overlapping villages, and the people in those villages are going to trust each other to not be bad faith actors. Everything else... everything that tries to scale... everything public... wasteland. Something something Dunbar&amp;#39;s number, Tragedy of the commons.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users appreciate these indie discovery tools, others argue that centralized aggregators lack long-term sustainability and quality control, suggesting instead that bloggers should host &amp;#34;social graphs&amp;#34; of links to peers they personally trust &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47626583&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Incredible that we are regressing back to webrings and hand-curated lists like this One of these hand-curated blog aggregator websites pops up on HN about every month. They&amp;#39;re cool and good on the author for trying to solve the problem, but it seems like the wrong approach to me.  They&amp;#39;re too disorganized, a random collection of mostly tech- and politics-related writing from random people with zero way to vet the quality of the writing.  They also require the creator/owner to care about the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47626651&quot; title=&quot;Couldn&amp;#39;t you technically crawl all these blogs for their &amp;#39;blog&amp;#39;s I&amp;#39;m reading&amp;#39; and create a social graph? You could start vetting based on how often other blogs link to that one, sort of like an impact factor in research.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47631055&quot; title=&quot;Ooooh I love these indie web aggregators. I wrote about some of my favorite ones here if anyone&amp;#39;s curious: https://nelson.cloud/how-i-discover-new-blogs/ . But here are some of my fav ways to discover blogs: - https://minifeed.net/welcome - https://indieblog.page/ - https://1mb.club/ - https://512kb.club/ - https://250kb.club/&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a notable divide regarding community interaction: some miss the connection of blog comments, while others prefer their absence to avoid the &amp;#34;wasteland&amp;#34; of spam and toxicity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47626279&quot; title=&quot;If you&amp;#39;re referring to comments on the website, I plan to keep it minimal (the text version is a static site). If you&amp;#39;re referring to comments on blogs in general, I have many thoughts. Back in the day, comments used to be how you connected with people and let other people find you. It also came with spam (spam plugins could only do so much). With the rise of static site generators, most people don&amp;#39;t have comments on their blogs now. It is something I miss though.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47626446&quot; title=&quot;I haven’t had comments on my blog for over a decade now and I don’t miss them. For every useful and informative comment I got several spammy or rude reply. Anyone who wants to let me know something about my blog can message me on social media. I’ve seen blogs that do not host comments themselves but instead automatically surface social media (usually mastodon) comments which I think is a useful technique.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47626850&quot; title=&quot;I think we&amp;#39;re going to reinvent Google&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;circles&amp;#39; mechanism from G+. We all (well, the terminally online, at least) are going to be part of several more or less overlapping villages, and the people in those villages are going to trust each other to not be bad faith actors. Everything else... everything that tries to scale... everything public... wasteland. Something something Dunbar&amp;#39;s number, Tragedy of the commons.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://apfel.franzai.com&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Apfel – The free AI already on your Mac&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (apfel.franzai.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47624645&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;728 points · 150 comments · by franze&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apfel is a free, open-source application that allows Mac users to access and run AI models locally on their devices. &lt;a href=&quot;https://apfel.franzai.com&quot; title=&quot;Github: &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;github.com&amp;amp;#x2F;Arthur-Ficial&amp;amp;#x2F;apfel&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;github.com&amp;amp;#x2F;Arthur-Ficial&amp;amp;#x2F;apfel&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a strong preference for local AI models due to increasing privacy concerns and the risks of sharing context with cloud providers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47625979&quot; title=&quot;I like the approach of running everything locally. I&amp;#39;m strongly of the opinion that the privacy angle for local models is going to keep getting stronger and more relevant. The amount of articles that come out about accidents happening because of people handing too much context to cloud models the more self reinforcing this will become.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47626219&quot; title=&quot;local is best for privacy, but i personally think you don&amp;#39;t need to go local. anthropic, google, openai etc, decided that their consumer ai plans would not be private. partly to collect training data, the other half to employ moderators to review user activity for safety. we trust that human moderators will not review and flag our icloud docs, onedrive or gmail, or aggregate such documents into training data for llms. it became the norm that an llm is somehow not private. it became a norm that…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some users warn that local servers can introduce security vulnerabilities, such as allowing malicious JavaScript from random webpages to issue commands via local ports &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47625563&quot; title=&quot;I’ve seen several projects like this that offer a network server with access to these Apple models. The danger is when they expose that, even on a loop port, to every other application on your system, including the browser. Random webpages are now shipping with JavaScript that will post to that port. Same-origin restrictions will stop data flow back to the webpage, but that doesn’t stop them from issuing commands to make changes. Some such projects use CORS to allow read back as well. I haven’t…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47625595&quot; title=&quot;I think any browser will allow it but not allow data read back.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While the project&amp;#39;s landing page was criticized for being overly &amp;#34;marketing heavy,&amp;#34; the underlying technology is praised for effectively leveraging Apple&amp;#39;s surprisingly capable built-in models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47625362&quot; title=&quot;It’s a very small model but I’ve been playing with it for some time now I’m impressed. Have we been sleeping on Apple’s models? Imagine they baked Qwen 3.5 level stuff into the OS. Wow that’d be cool.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47627387&quot; title=&quot;Looks like a nice wrapper around the APIs. Extremely oversold landing page, very marketing heavy for what it is. You can actually make nice looking landing pages that are about 10% the size of this and more straightforward, rather than some mimicry of a SaaS that&amp;#39;s trying desperately to sell you something. Makes it easier for you to review the content for factuality too, and heck you couldn&amp;#39;t even take ownership of some of the voice. Hard to know what to do with this. I&amp;#39;m interested in the…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.joanwestenberg.com/marc-andreessen-is-wrong-about-introspection/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Marc Andreessen is wrong about introspection&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (joanwestenberg.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47627056&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;392 points · &lt;strong&gt;471 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by surprisetalk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Joan Westenberg critiques Marc Andreessen’s claim that introspection was &amp;#34;manufactured&amp;#34; in the 20th century, arguing that self-examination is a foundational historical practice essential for understanding human flourishing and guiding meaningful progress. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.joanwestenberg.com/marc-andreessen-is-wrong-about-introspection/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Marc Andreessen is wrong about introspection    URL Source: https://www.joanwestenberg.com/marc-andreessen-is-wrong-about-introspection/    Published Time: 2026-03-18T06:53:51.000Z    Markdown Content:  # Marc Andreessen is wrong about introspection    [![Image 1](https://www.joanwestenberg.com/assets/images/header-mark.png?v=74f989646a)&amp;gt; Westenberg.](https://www.joanwestenberg.com/)[MENU][1. Home](https://www.joanwestenberg.com/)[2. About](https://www.joanwestenberg.com/about/)[3.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the perceived intellectual decline of wealthy tech figures like Marc Andreessen and Elon Musk, with many arguing that financial success has been conflated with universal expertise &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47627548&quot; title=&quot;Is the 1 percenters getting dumber or acting like it? Like 10 years ago, I felt like Andreesen and Elon were thought leaders. Now they sound like idiots. Did I or did they change? Did I grow up and they changed to a younger audience and what I used to enjoy was just a different kind of stupid?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628115&quot; title=&quot;Tim Dillon said summarized it pretty well - can&amp;#39;t remember or find the exact quote. Something to the effect of: &amp;#39;Look around at all these things I have - how could I be wrong when I have so much?&amp;#39; And that&amp;#39;s how you get the Andreessen&amp;#39;s and Musk&amp;#39;s of the world stating these nonsensical things as truth. In their minds, financial success is the ultimate yardstick. The fact that they have so much wealth is a testament that their way of thinking is always right. You don&amp;#39;t need to look very hard to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47627591&quot; title=&quot;This whole scenario is just the logical conclusion of American anti-intellectualism. The need for intellectuals doesn&amp;#39;t really go away, but rather we start assuming that &amp;#39;good at making money&amp;#39; = &amp;#39;has ideas worth listening to, on any topic.&amp;#39; Not really surprising that many of these people are also frequent critics of academia and professors.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Commentators suggest this &amp;#34;mental rot&amp;#34; stems from social media influence and a recursive belief that wealth validates all personal opinions, insulating the elite from necessary correction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47627407&quot; title=&quot;We all know he’s wrong. The problem isn’t that he is wrong, it’s that we have elevated the wealthy into a status where they can be wrong, have no correction, and make decisions whole clothe which negatively affect the rest of us. All while being insulated from their negative world view.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628115&quot; title=&quot;Tim Dillon said summarized it pretty well - can&amp;#39;t remember or find the exact quote. Something to the effect of: &amp;#39;Look around at all these things I have - how could I be wrong when I have so much?&amp;#39; And that&amp;#39;s how you get the Andreessen&amp;#39;s and Musk&amp;#39;s of the world stating these nonsensical things as truth. In their minds, financial success is the ultimate yardstick. The fact that they have so much wealth is a testament that their way of thinking is always right. You don&amp;#39;t need to look very hard to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47627614&quot; title=&quot;They changed. You wouldn’t believe it but those most impacted by the mental rot that social media can induce - are the ultra wealthy.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate whether these figures have actually changed or simply lost their &amp;#34;natural filters,&amp;#34; others warn that dismissing the wealthy entirely is a form of anti-intellectualism that ignores the practical costs and realities of decision-making &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628506&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; In their minds, financial success is the ultimate yardstick. In a loopy recursive way, it is. Cost gates what we can do and become. Paying back your costs to extend your runway is the working principle behind biology, economy and technology. I am not saying rich people are always right, just that cost is not so irrelevant to everything else. I personally think cost satisfaction explains multiple levels, from biology up. Related to introspection - it certainly has a cost for doing it, and a…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628880&quot; title=&quot;Elon was always problematic. His increasing social media use removed the natural filters that prevented people from seeing it.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628984&quot; title=&quot;Anti intellectualism is also falling into the local optima trap of “rich people bad” that a lots of people seem to fall into. The idea that rich people have something to say is so alien that no deeper analysis is warranted.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nationaltoday.com/us/tx/austin/news/2026/04/03/oracle-files-thousands-of-h-1b-visa-petitions-amid-mass-layoffs/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Oracle files H-1B visa petitions amid mass layoffs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nationaltoday.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47631732&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;514 points · 314 comments · by kklisura&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oracle has filed over 3,100 H-1B visa petitions for fiscal years 2025 and 2026 while simultaneously laying off thousands of American workers as part of a major organizational shift. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nationaltoday.com/us/tx/austin/news/2026/04/03/oracle-files-thousands-of-h-1b-visa-petitions-amid-mass-layoffs/&quot; title=&quot;Oracle Files Thousands of H-1B Visa Petitions Amid Mass Layoffs - Austin Today    Oracle, the software company headquartered in Austin, Texas, has filed thousands of petitions for H-1B visas in the past two fiscal years, even as it lays off thousands of American workers as part of a broader organizational shift. Federal data shows Oracle filed for 2,690 H-1B visas in fiscal year 2025 and 436 so far in fiscal year 2026, totaling over 3,100 visa…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether Oracle’s H-1B petitions during layoffs represent a genuine need for specialized talent or a strategy to suppress wages and exploit workers with reduced mobility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632434&quot; title=&quot;Just to cut through the headline here. The largest chunk of Oracle layoffs were in India [1]. In comparison, they&amp;#39;ve barely fired any American workers. Contrary to popular opinion, IT workers aren&amp;#39;t interchangeable and there exist a large swath of jobs that very few people qualify for (HN should know this) because of the specialization required. America is at near full employment [2]. Replacing American workers with lower paid foreign workers is already illegal and frequently enforced[3]. This…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632282&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand why American workers would support this program at this scale. Furthermore, I believe universities and other similar researchy/affiliated non-profits are exempt from the hiring caps. I just cannot imagine executives at tech companies/body shops having any positive ethical motivations. More like &amp;#39;they&amp;#39;ll do what we say without complaining or they&amp;#39;ll go home&amp;#39;. There&amp;#39;s no way it&amp;#39;s not just a hugely abusive to both pools of workers. The whole thing really feels like another…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632925&quot; title=&quot;I suppose we simply disagree, and that is fine. I think the H-1B should be eliminated in favor of the O-1, the domestic labor exists, corporations would simply prefer &amp;#39;optimize their labor costs&amp;#39; and employ workers with reduced mobility via the H-1B. The data is clear from the salaries paid, which is public data. As I&amp;#39;ve commented previously: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46257889 &amp;#39;I am calling for a temporary moratorium for issuing new worker visas based on the current economic macro…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that the layoffs primarily affected international offices and that domestic IT labor remains at &amp;#34;near full employment,&amp;#34; others point to systemic &amp;#34;gaming&amp;#34; of the program, such as hiding job postings from U.S. citizens and using middlemen to source cheaper labor &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632434&quot; title=&quot;Just to cut through the headline here. The largest chunk of Oracle layoffs were in India [1]. In comparison, they&amp;#39;ve barely fired any American workers. Contrary to popular opinion, IT workers aren&amp;#39;t interchangeable and there exist a large swath of jobs that very few people qualify for (HN should know this) because of the specialization required. America is at near full employment [2]. Replacing American workers with lower paid foreign workers is already illegal and frequently enforced[3]. This…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632787&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; America is at near full employment [2]. Replacing American workers with lower paid foreign workers is already illegal and frequently enforced[3]. Corporations are trying to hide job openings from US citizens - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45223719 - September 2025 (526 comments) Job Listing Site Highlighting H-1B Positions So Americans Can Apply - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44892321 - August 2025 (108 comments) H-1B Middlemen Bring Cheap Labor to Citi, Capital One -…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632925&quot; title=&quot;I suppose we simply disagree, and that is fine. I think the H-1B should be eliminated in favor of the O-1, the domestic labor exists, corporations would simply prefer &amp;#39;optimize their labor costs&amp;#39; and employ workers with reduced mobility via the H-1B. The data is clear from the salaries paid, which is public data. As I&amp;#39;ve commented previously: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46257889 &amp;#39;I am calling for a temporary moratorium for issuing new worker visas based on the current economic macro…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant debate exists regarding the efficacy of recent policy changes, such as the $100k H-1B fee, with some questioning if the fee is being enforced or if corporations simply find the cost justifiable to maintain control over their workforce &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632067&quot; title=&quot;I would expect further H1B crackdowns coming. The $100k fee was just the start.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632925&quot; title=&quot;I suppose we simply disagree, and that is fine. I think the H-1B should be eliminated in favor of the O-1, the domestic labor exists, corporations would simply prefer &amp;#39;optimize their labor costs&amp;#39; and employ workers with reduced mobility via the H-1B. The data is clear from the salaries paid, which is public data. As I&amp;#39;ve commented previously: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46257889 &amp;#39;I am calling for a temporary moratorium for issuing new worker visas based on the current economic macro…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47633184&quot; title=&quot;What I’m not clear on - how many of these H1B hires are subject to the EO that jacked up the fee to $100k per person? Assuming even just 100 of them were, that’s still ten million USD (assuming I didn’t visualize the zeroes in my head wrong…), and a really large fee to justify to the board if you’re otherwise paying “roughly the same” in salary. Productivity is going to basically break even anyway after a few years. This is why I’m wondering: did the EO get blocked, paused for judicial review…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a call for a temporary moratorium on new visas, with critics noting that unlike the PERM process&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33579&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OpenClaw privilege escalation vulnerability&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nvd.nist.gov)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628608&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;510 points · 254 comments · by kykeonaut&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A privilege escalation vulnerability identified as CVE-2026-33579 has been discovered in OpenClaw, potentially allowing attackers to compromise systems running the software. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33579&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;old.reddit.com&amp;amp;#x2F;r&amp;amp;#x2F;sysadmin&amp;amp;#x2F;comments&amp;amp;#x2F;1sbdw29&amp;amp;#x2F;if_youre_running_openclaw_you_probably_got_hacked&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;old.reddit.com&amp;amp;#x2F;r&amp;amp;#x2F;sysadmin&amp;amp;#x2F;comments&amp;amp;#x2F;1sbdw29&amp;amp;#x2F;if_youre_...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;web.archive.org&amp;amp;#x2F;web&amp;amp;#x2F;20260403174514&amp;amp;#x2F;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;old.reddit.com&amp;amp;#x2F;r&amp;amp;#x2F;sysadmin&amp;amp;#x2F;comments&amp;amp;#x2F;1sbdw29&amp;amp;#x2F;if_youre_running_openclaw_you_probably_got_hacked&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The OpenClaw creator clarified that the vulnerability was a &amp;#34;scope-ceiling bypass&amp;#34; rather than a remote exploit, requiring an already-authorized user to escalate privileges via a specific command path &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47629849&quot; title=&quot;OpenClaw creator here. This was a privilege-escalation bug, but not &amp;#39;any random Telegram/Discord message can instantly own every OpenClaw instance.&amp;#39; The root issue was an incomplete fix. The earlier advisory hardened the gateway RPC path for device approvals by passing the caller&amp;#39;s scopes into the core approval check. But the `/pair approve` plugin command path still called the same approval function without `callerScopes`, and the core logic failed open when that parameter was missing. So the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find the tool useful for automating tasks like meeting scraping or gym bookings within isolated environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47630062&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve only been playing with it recently ... I have mine scraping for SF city meetings that I can attend and public comment to advocate for more housing etc ( https://github.com/sgillen/sf-civic-digest ). It also have mine automatically grabs a spot at my gym when spots are released because I always forget. I&amp;#39;m just playing with it, it&amp;#39;s been fun! It&amp;#39;s all on a VM in the cloud and I assume it could get pwned at any time but the blast radius would be small.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others criticize the project for &amp;#34;vibe coded bloat&amp;#34; and a track record of over 400 security issues &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47629399&quot; title=&quot;OpenClaw has over 400+ security issues and vulnerabilities. [0] Why on earth would you install something like that has access to your entire machine, even if it is a separate one which has the potential to scan local networks? Who is even making money out of OpenClaw other than the people attempting to host it? I see little use out of it other than a way to get yourself hacked by anyone. [0] https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47630185&quot; title=&quot;The root issue is that OpenClaw is 500K+ lines of vibe coded bloat that&amp;#39;s impossible to reason about or understand. Too much focus on shipping features, not enough attention to stability and security. As the code base grows exponentially, so does the security vulnerability surface.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant debate regarding the software&amp;#39;s utility, with skeptics questioning the risks of granting such a vulnerable codebase access to personal data or local networks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47629807&quot; title=&quot;Honest question: What do people actually USE OpenClaw for? The most common usage seems to be &amp;#39;it reads your emails!&amp;#39;, that&amp;#39;s the exact opposite of &amp;#39;exciting&amp;#39;...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47629440&quot; title=&quot;Title is a bit misleading, no? You have to have openclaw running on an open box. And the post even says &amp;#39;135k open instances&amp;#39; out of 500k running instances? so a bit clickbait-y&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47629399&quot; title=&quot;OpenClaw has over 400+ security issues and vulnerabilities. [0] Why on earth would you install something like that has access to your entire machine, even if it is a separate one which has the potential to scan local networks? Who is even making money out of OpenClaw other than the people attempting to host it? I see little use out of it other than a way to get yourself hacked by anyone. [0] https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nworbmot.org/blog/solar-battery-world.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Solar and batteries can power the world&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nworbmot.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47627061&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;290 points · &lt;strong&gt;453 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by edent&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By 2030, solar and batteries can provide 90% of electricity for 80% of the global population at costs below 80 €/MWh. While high-latitude regions face seasonal challenges, integrating wind and hydro further reduces costs, making renewable-dominated systems a viable, cheap, and clean solution for most of the world. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nworbmot.org/blog/solar-battery-world.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: blog | nworbmot:tombrown    URL Source: https://nworbmot.org/blog/solar-battery-world.html    Published Time: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 15:35:47 GMT    Markdown Content:  # blog | nworbmot:tombrown    *   [home](https://nworbmot.org/index.html)  *   [publications](https://nworbmot.org/publications.html)  *   [talks](https://nworbmot.org/talks.html)  *   [code](https://nworbmot.org/code.html)  *   [teaching](https://nworbmot.org/teaching.html)  *   [other](https://nworbmot.org/physics/index.html)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The feasibility of a solar and battery-powered world is heavily debated, with critics highlighting the massive energy requirements for heating and the lifestyle trade-offs currently required in mild or northern climates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47627504&quot; title=&quot;The article is just wrong. And only mentions energy used for heating in passing. Heating requires MASSIVE amounts of energy. I should know bc I have a whole house battery and solar system (almost 30 kWh battery and 24kW solar). It keeps the lights on, but not heating. I live in a mild climate. The reality is that battery/solar requires major quality of life and activity time shifting trade-offs.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628313&quot; title=&quot;I build off-grid camper vans for a living and install solar + lithium battery systems regularly. The technology has matured a lot in the last few years. What used to take a massive roof array and a bank of heavy lead-acid or AGM batteries to run basic appliances now fits in a fraction of the space with lithium. The limiting factor in real-world installs isn&amp;#39;t the panels or the batteries anymore, it&amp;#39;s getting customers to right-size the system for their actual usage instead of what they think…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents argue that the transition is a matter of time and infrastructure, noting that replacing land currently used for ethanol corn with solar panels could exceed total U.S. energy demands &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47627835&quot; title=&quot;Fun fact, 12 million hectares of land of used to produce corn used for ethanol which is used to produce gas. I&amp;#39;ll let you draw the conclusion. https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2025/04/trading-some-corn-e...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47627948&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, the technology connections video on this was fantastic. If one was to cover that land in solar, you’d produce far more than the current energy demands of the US. Relying on an energy source which requires constant, continuous resource extraction is fucking stupid when we can spend resources up front and get reliable energy (solar + battery) for decades with minimal operating cost &amp;amp; maintenance. And then we’ll have a recycling loop to minimize future resource extraction. If you want to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628208&quot; title=&quot;The economics only changed recently and infrastructure lasts a long time.  It’s the same reason EV’s make up a far larger share of new car sales than a percentage of overall cars, EV’s sucked 20+ years ago yet there are a lot of 20+ year old cars on the road. The US stopped building coal power plants over a decade ago but we still have a lot of them.  Meanwhile we’ve mostly been building solar, which eventually means we’ll have a mostly solar grid but that’s still decades away.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest that modern insulation and nuclear power offer more efficient paths to decarbonization &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47627819&quot; title=&quot;People still build houses like energy is cheap and abundant. A properly insulated house in any temperate climate require very little heating or cooling. Spend 50k on insulation that will last the life of the building instead of 50k on heating and cooling devices which will need constant maintenance and replacement + fuel and end up costing 10x more over the life of the building. A modern house with modern insulation in a mild climate shouldn&amp;#39;t even need a central heating system. You can get by…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47627633&quot; title=&quot;Nuclear could have powered the world easily and we could have done it with 1960s technology. And we could easily do electricity and heating with nuclear quite easily. The only thing that&amp;#39;s actually tricky is synfuels and solar/battery doesn&amp;#39;t solve that. High temperature reactors using heat to create hydrogen is arguable the better path to synfuels then electrolysis. And we can go to 100% of electricity from nuclear, we don&amp;#39;t have to have this dumb argument about &amp;#39;the last 5-10%&amp;#39;. Because its…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others emphasize that recent advancements in lithium technology have already made net-zero living possible for those who right-size their systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47627790&quot; title=&quot;I live in a northern climate and I know multiple people who are net zero with solar+basic battery. Proper insulation and good windows go a very long way. For instance, I set my heat to 66F during the day and 60F at night. When I wake up in the morning, the register is usually still above 60F.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628313&quot; title=&quot;I build off-grid camper vans for a living and install solar + lithium battery systems regularly. The technology has matured a lot in the last few years. What used to take a massive roof array and a bank of heavy lead-acid or AGM batteries to run basic appliances now fits in a fraction of the space with lithium. The limiting factor in real-world installs isn&amp;#39;t the panels or the batteries anymore, it&amp;#39;s getting customers to right-size the system for their actual usage instead of what they think…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/faas-temporary-flight-restriction-drones-blatant-attempt-criminalize-filming-ice&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The FAA’s flight restriction for drones is an attempt to criminalize filming ICE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (eff.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47633947&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;545 points · 181 comments · by detaro&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The EFF is demanding the FAA rescind a nationwide 21-month flight restriction that prohibits drones from flying within 3,000 feet of government vehicles, arguing the rule unconstitutionally criminalizes the filming of ICE and CBP agents. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/faas-temporary-flight-restriction-drones-blatant-attempt-criminalize-filming-ice&quot; title=&quot;Title: The FAA’s “Temporary” Flight Restriction for Drones is a Blatant Attempt to Criminalize Filming ICE    URL Source: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/faas-temporary-flight-restriction-drones-blatant-attempt-criminalize-filming-ice    Published Time: 2026-04-03T15:25:21-07:00    Markdown Content:  # The FAA’s “Temporary” Flight Restriction for Drones is a Blatant Attempt to Criminalize Filming ICE | Electronic Frontier Foundation  [Skip to main…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters express concern that the FAA’s drone restrictions are a &amp;#34;power grab&amp;#34; designed to prevent the documentation of ICE activities, particularly since the rules apply to potentially unmarked vehicles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47634435&quot; title=&quot;In general the Trump administration is the most emergency based folks on the planet. If it&amp;#39;s not for emergency reasons, it&amp;#39;s for national security reasons. None of it is explained or backed. They just take the hallpass and fuck off to do whatever the hell they like. Axios had good coverage of this. https://www.axios.com/2025/04/18/trump-national-emergency-de... Brazen mis-governance. I think it&amp;#39;s particularly insulting to call so many things emergencies, threats. This is the work of the…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47634531&quot; title=&quot;Flying a drone within 1/2 mile of ICE vehicles, which may be unmarked, is illegal? You can be flying a drone and if an unmarked ICE vehicle drives close enough, without warning, you have now broken serious FAA laws? This isn’t the kind of restriction that gets passed when the people making the rules care about being fair or consistent. It’s a power grab.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that &amp;#34;mens rea&amp;#34; requirements might protect accidental violators, others suggest the primary impact will be the legal suppression of drone footage used against the agency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47634783&quot; title=&quot;IANAL but mens rea is a serious consideration here. A prosecutor would have to prove that you have knowingly and wilfully committed the crime in order to be convicted, so unmarked cars are in practice out of scope. I think the main implication is that you won&amp;#39;t be able to use any drone recordings for legal action against ICE unless you can prove that you recorded from further than 3,000 feet (one hell of a camera) or that you did it &amp;#39;accidentally&amp;#39;, e.g. I was just filming my friends and ICE…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The thread also features a broader debate on political stability, with some advocating for robust social safety nets to prevent extremism while others discuss more radical solutions like state secession or subdivision &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47634807&quot; title=&quot;Reminder that the most reliable way to prevent the rise of the far right is to implement robust safety nets and low inequality, to reduce status anxiety and grievance. Support for such measures (welfare, healthcare, unionization, high taxes etc) is usually low among Americans. https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/10/welfare-cuts...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47634711&quot; title=&quot;Thanks for the links. Hopefully things get bad enough people actually take control of government again. I personally used to scoff at CalExit but now seeing how easy it is for a government to abuse you from a distance, I would much prefer Sacramento the ultimate seat of power for my community, family and interests.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635024&quot; title=&quot;A marginally less-extreme option would be to start subdividing larger states. The Constitution does not permit amendments to change the &amp;#39;equal&amp;#39; representation of states in the Senate, but we can even the playing field by making it easy for large states to subdivide for the benefit of the people.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mtlynch.io/claude-code-found-linux-vulnerability/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Claude Code Found a Linux Vulnerability Hidden for 23 Years&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mtlynch.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47633855&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;413 points · 258 comments · by eichin&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic researcher Nicholas Carlini used Claude Code to discover multiple remotely exploitable vulnerabilities in the Linux kernel, including a critical heap overflow in the network file share (NFS) driver that had remained hidden for 23 years. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mtlynch.io/claude-code-found-linux-vulnerability/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Claude Code Found a Linux Vulnerability Hidden for 23 Years    URL Source: https://mtlynch.io/claude-code-found-linux-vulnerability/    Published Time: 2026-04-03T00:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Claude Code Found a Linux Vulnerability Hidden for 23 Years · mtlynch.io    [![Image 1: Author photo](https://mtlynch.io/images/avatar.jpg)](https://mtlynch.io/)[Michael Lynch](https://mtlynch.io/)    - [x]   *   [Blog](https://mtlynch.io/posts/)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users argue that LLM-driven security audits are plagued by high false-positive rates and significant human overhead &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637780&quot; title=&quot;This isn&amp;#39;t surprising. What is not mentioned is that Claude Code also found one thousand false positive bugs, which developers spent three months to rule out.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that multi-stage pipelines can now automatically filter and verify vulnerabilities with high accuracy before they reach a developer &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47639718&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s not what is happening right now. The bugs are often filtered later by LLMs themselves: if the second pipeline can&amp;#39;t reproduce the crash / violation / exploit in any way, often the false positives are evicted before ever reaching the human scrutiny. Checking if a real vulnerability can be triggered is a trivial task compared to finding one, so this second pipeline has an almost 100% success rate from the POV: if it passes the second pipeline, it is almost certainly a real bug, and very…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637922&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; What is not mentioned is that Claude Code also found one thousand false positive bugs, which developers spent three months to rule out. Source? I haven&amp;#39;t seen this anywhere. In my experience, false positive rate on vulnerabilities with Claude Opus 4.6 is  well below 20%.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a sharp disagreement regarding cost: some find token prices negligible for routine coding &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47634429&quot; title=&quot;Tokens are insanely cheap at the moment.   Through OpenRouter a message to Sonnet costs about $0.001 cents or using Devstral 2512 it&amp;#39;s about $0.0001.  An extended coding session/feature expansion will cost me about $5 in credits.   Split up your codebase so you don&amp;#39;t have to feed all of it into the LLM at once and it&amp;#39;s a very reasonable.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, while others report that exhaustive, deep-system security exploration remains prohibitively expensive, potentially costing hundreds of thousands of dollars &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47634167&quot; title=&quot;This does sound great, but the cost of tokens will prevent most companies from using agents to secure their code.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635442&quot; title=&quot;It cost me ~$750 to find a tricky privilege escalation bug in a complex codebase where I knew the rough specs but didn&amp;#39;t have the exploit. There are certainly still many other bugs like that in the codebase, and it would cost $100k-$1MM to explore the rest of the system that deeply with models at or above the capability of Opus 4.6. It&amp;#39;s definitely possible to do a basic pass for much less (I do this with autopen.dev), but it is still very expensive to exhaustively find the harder…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite skepticism that the discovered bug was simply a &amp;#34;low-hanging fruit&amp;#34; overlooked by static analyzers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637534&quot; title=&quot;Not &amp;#39;hidden&amp;#39;, but probably more like &amp;#39;no one bothered to look&amp;#39;. declares a 1024-byte owner ID, which is an unusually long but legal value for the owner ID. When I&amp;#39;m designing protocols or writing code with variable-length elements, &amp;#39;what is the valid range of lengths?&amp;#39; is always at the front of my mind. it uses a memory buffer that’s only 112 bytes. The denial message includes the owner ID, which can be up to 1024 bytes, bringing the total size of the message to 1056 bytes. The kernel writes…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, many developers view LLMs as powerful tools for identifying complex threading or distributed system bugs that lack traditional tooling &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47638521&quot; title=&quot;Pasting a big batch of new code and asking Claude &amp;#39;what have I forgotten? Where are the bugs?&amp;#39; is a very persuasive on-ramp for developers new to AI. It spots threading &amp;amp; distributed system bugs that would have taken hours to uncover before, and where there isn&amp;#39;t any other easy tooling. I bet there&amp;#39;s loads of cryptocurrency implementations being pored over right now - actual money on the table.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47638610&quot; title=&quot;The lesson here shouldn&amp;#39;t be that Claude Code is useless, but that it&amp;#39;s a powerful tool in the hands of the right people.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.inaturalist.org/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;iNaturalist&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (inaturalist.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47629433&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;527 points · 134 comments · by bookofjoe&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;iNaturalist is a global citizen science platform that allows users to record, share, and crowdsource identifications of biological observations to support biodiversity research and conservation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.inaturalist.org/&quot; title=&quot;Title: iNaturalist    URL Source: https://www.inaturalist.org/    Markdown Content:  # A Community for Naturalists · iNaturalist    *   [Search](https://www.inaturalist.org/search)  *   [Explore](https://www.inaturalist.org/observations)  *   [Community](https://www.inaturalist.org/people)      *   [People](https://www.inaturalist.org/people)      *   [Projects](https://www.inaturalist.org/projects)      *   [Journal Posts](https://www.inaturalist.org/journal)      *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While users praise iNaturalist for its educational value and &amp;#34;gem&amp;#34; of an open API &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47629621&quot; title=&quot;The iNaturalist API is an absolute gem. It doesn&amp;#39;t require authentication for read-only operations and it has open CORS headers which means it&amp;#39;s amazing for demos and tutorials. My partner and I built this website with it a few years ago: https://www.owlsnearme.com/ (I realize this is a bit on-brand for me but I also use it to track pelicans https://tools.simonwillison.net/species-observation-map#%7B%... )&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47629713&quot; title=&quot;I also love the Seek app that they provide (maybe this overlaps with the linked app in functionality?). As someone who&amp;#39;s grown fonder of Nature in general over the last decade but who has little actual knowledge of the regional flora and fauna, it&amp;#39;s a great way to engage with the plants and little bugs in my garden (or others&amp;#39; while on walks and such). Fun to travel and &amp;#39;pokemon&amp;#39; some new local stuff too.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47629879&quot; title=&quot;I send things too iNaturalist all the time, it&amp;#39;s great, it really helped me learn about my local fauna. I want to do a project with their API to identify a couple hundred wildflower photos I&amp;#39;ve been hoarding. Would that work? ( Idea is my wildflower app could send to their models to confirm my original identification)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, significant concerns exist regarding privacy and doxxing, as non-technical users often inadvertently reveal their home addresses by uploading backyard observations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47630205&quot; title=&quot;I love this app, but it&amp;#39;s also a significant doxxing risk especially for the large number of non-technical users that it has. A quick look at the map reveals the home addresses and names of many iNaturalist users in my neighborhood, lots of them older folks that probably don&amp;#39;t realize that adding all of the neat wildlife that they see in their backyard (or uploading things they see on remote hikes without any 3G coverage once their phone connects to their home wifi network) is also putting…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users report that publicizing rare or invasive species can lead to unexpected real-world visits from both curious hobbyists and government agricultural inspectors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47630941&quot; title=&quot;I can hide my home-based observation locations, but others usually do not. People who post observations in my front yard cause other iNat users to visit. This hasn&amp;#39;t been a problem in that there have been only a few additional visitors, and they are friendly. Still, I don&amp;#39;t like my yard being publicized. People who walk by the yard might tell their friends, but ordinary word-of-mouth can&amp;#39;t be queried online. Not yet. EDIT: We did have what turned out to be a significant invasive species…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a consensus that the &amp;#34;Seek&amp;#34; companion app is hindered by repetitive safety modals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47629814&quot; title=&quot;Seek throws up a „please don‘t disturb nature“ modal at every single start that you need to click away. Usually at that point the bird has gone away, too. The iNaturalist app doesn‘t. It has more features, but Seek‘s former advantage „let me just the a photo and auto-identify“ is now in the iNaturalist main app, as well, so it is my default now.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47630048&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Seek throws up a „please don‘t disturb nature“ modal at every single start that you need to click away. Frustration shared.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, leading many to prefer the main iNaturalist app or Cornell’s Merlin and BirdNet tools for identification &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47629719&quot; title=&quot;Similar category: Merlin Bird ID [1]. Uses audio to identify the birds around you. [1] https://merlin.allaboutbirds.org/&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47629814&quot; title=&quot;Seek throws up a „please don‘t disturb nature“ modal at every single start that you need to click away. Usually at that point the bird has gone away, too. The iNaturalist app doesn‘t. It has more features, but Seek‘s former advantage „let me just the a photo and auto-identify“ is now in the iNaturalist main app, as well, so it is my default now.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47630665&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s Merlin and then there&amp;#39;s Birdnet too https://birdnet.cornell.edu/ . Both by Cornell.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.freevacy.com/news/financial-times/nhs-staff-refusing-to-use-fdp-over-palantir-ethical-concerns/7272&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;NHS staff refusing to use FDP over Palantir ethical concerns&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (freevacy.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47624736&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;356 points · 170 comments · by chrisjj&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.freevacy.com/news/financial-times/nhs-staff-refusing-to-use-fdp-over-palantir-ethical-concerns/7272&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The NHS&amp;#39;s £330 million contract with Palantir has sparked intense criticism regarding its high cost relative to patient care and the company&amp;#39;s controversial reputation for government surveillance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47625241&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The US technology company was awarded a £330 million contract in 2023 to collate operational data, including patient information and waiting lists. That contract value is ridiculous - how many full time staff do they have on this project and what rates are they charging? How can some say ‘operational data collection’ is worth a third of a billion to NHS over the alternatives of using a third of a billion on patient healthcare and actual medical research? This needs an investigation around how…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47625370&quot; title=&quot;I assume the purpose of Palantir is to enable the Federal government to circumvent the constitution by framing their new spy agency as a public/private partnership. From that lens the funding makes sense.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47625261&quot; title=&quot;What were NHS execs thinking signing a contract with palantir? Either they are completely ignorant about what palantir is and who it&amp;#39;s owned by (would be very concerning) or they are corrupt and were bribed.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the NHS is plagued by structural inefficiency and questionable bureaucratic spending &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47626427&quot; title=&quot;This is why I disagree with the idea that we should keep increasing funding to the NHS. The argument always seems to come to a false dichotomy of &amp;#39;either this or the American system&amp;#39; as though other systems don&amp;#39;t exist, and as though the NHS isn&amp;#39;t top heavy with bureaucrats and questionable contracts&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47626637&quot; title=&quot;The truth is that the NHS is very bad not due to funding, but for structural reasons. The fact I can&amp;#39;t even see a GP I&amp;#39;m not registered with (not even an option to pay extra) is ridiculous. You have absolutely no control over your health at all. With private, you get exactly what you want, whenever you want it.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend the contract price is negligible compared to the total £242 billion annual budget of a system still struggling to modernize basic technology &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47625814&quot; title=&quot;https://www.adamsmith.org/blog/apparently-the-nhs-is-the-wor... https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/removi... nhs is famous dumb and has spent years trying to stop using fax machine. £330 million is nothing over a few years.. NHS budget for 2024/25 is circa £242 billion. the entire annual intake from capital gains tax is £20 million or so&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. The debate also triggered a pedantic dispute over whether the UK possesses a constitution, with users clarifying that it exists in an uncodified, non-entrenched form &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47625388&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s no federal government in the UK, nor constitution&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47625497&quot; title=&quot;There is absolutely a Constitution in the UK, it is simply not codified into a single document. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_United_Kin... More importantly, the UK is a Constitutional Monarchy, with ultimate legislative power vested in Parliament rather than the Monarch.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47626208&quot; title=&quot;I find it weird that people would downvote this, I know you should not complain about it, but this comment is correct. The UK does have a (uncodified) constitution. Also of note; even countries with a codified constitution have parts that are uncodified.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47626976&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; There is absolutely a Constitution in the UK, it is simply not codified into a single document. That&amp;#39;s got to be the understatement of (many) centuries. AFAIK the UK constitution isn&amp;#39;t even even codified into millions of documents, let alone a &amp;#39;single&amp;#39; one. Saying it&amp;#39;s not in a &amp;#39;single&amp;#39; document is like saying my trillions of dollars aren&amp;#39;t in a &amp;#39;single&amp;#39; bank account. The number of partitions really isn&amp;#39;t the problem with that statement here. Is there a single human (or even computer…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bgslabs.org/blog/why-are-we-using-markdown/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why are we still using Markdown?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bgslabs.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47629903&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;222 points · &lt;strong&gt;303 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by veqq&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that Markdown has become a &amp;#34;Frankenstein’s monster&amp;#34; due to ambiguous syntax, security vulnerabilities like XSS and ReDoS, and the inclusion of inline HTML, suggesting it should be replaced by a saner markup language with a formal build system and a trivially parsable grammar. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bgslabs.org/blog/why-are-we-using-markdown/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Why the heck are we still using Markdown??    URL Source: https://bgslabs.org/blog/why-are-we-using-markdown/    Published Time: 2026-03-02    Markdown Content:  &amp;gt; There are few things in life that bring me much joy and hate at the same time. Like chocolate that hurts when eaten and markdown. Seriously why?? Half of the time we aren’t even using the full language!    ## HTML is the best Programming Language!    I know you’ve heard people say the only _programming_ language they know is HTML. And I…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Markdown persists because it prioritizes &amp;#34;worse is better&amp;#34; pragmatism, minimizing friction for authors by codifying long-standing text conventions from Usenet and email &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47630034&quot; title=&quot;Because, like UNIX/Linux itself, worse is better: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worse_is_better - and perfect is the enemy of &amp;#39;good enough.&amp;#39; We want to encourage people to produce written output with minimal friction. Barriers to writing--and especially barriers to producing documentation--should be minimized. Writing well is difficult enough! Markup is overhead. Complex markup is even more overhead. Markdown is the best compromise we know of today that provides just enough structure and…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47630316&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s also worth remembering that markdown tried very hard to encode conventions that were already used in Usenet, email, and other text media.  A &amp;gt; to indicate a quote was widespread Usenet convention.  Asterisks or underscores to indicate emphasis was also a common convention; both are legal because both were common.  Double asterisk or double underscores to indicate really, really emphasizing something was also a common convention.  So were asterisks to display a bulleted list, blank lines to…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47630399&quot; title=&quot;markdown tried very hard to encode conventions that were already used in Usenet, email, and other text media For those of you who weren&amp;#39;t there: *bold*      _underline_      ~strikethrough~      /italics/      &amp;gt; Quotation      - list    - list    - list I&amp;#39;ve been using these for almost half a century.  They&amp;#39;re much easier and more intuitive than Markdown.  I see no compelling reason to change.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While critics point to technical flaws like parsing ambiguities and &amp;#34;disappearing&amp;#34; characters, proponents argue that its primary value lies in being human-readable even in its raw form &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47636086&quot; title=&quot;Suppose you want to use asterisks to mark footnotes.* As soon as you add a second footnote,** you&amp;#39;re in trouble because your asterisks disappear and everything between them turns bold. * I had to escape all of these asterisks. ** I see this happen fairly often to people&amp;#39;s comments here.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47636378&quot; title=&quot;Disappearing asterisks is just terrible UX. It should turn bold but keep the asterisk displayed so you can still edit as normal. The bullet point problem is fixed by only bolding when the asterisks are on either end of word characters.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47630258&quot; title=&quot;Somewhat related past discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41120254 Copying my thoughts from there which haven&amp;#39;t changed: &amp;gt;To which I say, are you really going to avoid using a good tool just because it makes you puke? Because looking at it makes your stomach churn? Because it offends every fiber of your being?&amp;#39; Yes. A thousand times yes. Because the biggest advantage of Markdown is that it&amp;#39;s easy to read, and its second-biggest advantage is that it&amp;#39;s easy to write. How easy it is…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, the consensus is that Markdown’s lack of layout control is a feature that ensures content remains accessible across any device or tool &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47634604&quot; title=&quot;This may be the first time my reaction to an objectively terrible programming language is a shrug and a &amp;#39;whatever&amp;#39;. I like using markdown. I use it for journaling in Obsidian. It does everything I want it to. I like that it&amp;#39;s just flat files. I don&amp;#39;t want my journaling to be stuck in some online database. Yet, I am the same person who refuses to code in anything but Rust due to how not-awful it feels to me. Strange how a person can hold a completely opposite view for two instances of the same…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47630200&quot; title=&quot;Mark down is great because it doesn&amp;#39;t define a bunch of things. Headline? Its a headline, no font, no sizing, no colors... Just a headline. It means that it can be displayed on any device, printed on any paper, work with any accessibility tool and optimized for what ever requirements the reader has, not what ever the writer thought looked good. The web is full of great content being made hard to access because of poor/inflexible layout choices. Just give me the text and let me choose how to…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://only-eu.eu/en/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;European alternatives to Google, Apple, Dropbox and 120 US apps&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (only-eu.eu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47624741&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;361 points · 158 comments · by madman_dev&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Only EU is a curated directory that helps users find European alternatives to popular U.S. software and products, emphasizing stricter privacy standards, environmental sustainability, and regional quality. &lt;a href=&quot;https://only-eu.eu/en/&quot; title=&quot;Title: European Alternatives to US Products &amp;amp; Software | Only EU    URL Source: https://only-eu.eu/en/    Markdown Content:  # European Alternatives to US Products &amp;amp; Software | Only EU  [![Image 1: Only EU](https://only-eu.eu/logo.svg)](https://only-eu.eu/en)    [Cloud Storage](https://only-eu.eu/en/categories/cloud-storage)[Password Manager](https://only-eu.eu/en/categories/passwortmanager)[Email](https://only-eu.eu/en/categories/email)[VPN](https://only-eu.eu/en/categories/vpn)    Find alternative…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Critics argue the website is a low-effort affiliate marketing project that lacks credibility because it relies on US-based infrastructure like Cloudflare and Porkbun while claiming to promote European independence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47625133&quot; title=&quot;The affiliate information shows that it the website shows mostly / only affiliate offers, and omits (intentionally?) much better a lternatives like posteo.de for email.  Listed vendors like OVHcloud must follow the US cloud act, so not really independent from US. Just advertising, no real privacy focused.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47625278&quot; title=&quot;Domain is registered 23 March 2026. This is not a real product, with zero effort put into it.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47625617&quot; title=&quot;The website uses Cloudflare for hosting. If they were just even a little bit serious, they wouldn’t have used a US provider for hosting.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47625163&quot; title=&quot;only-eu.eu registered on Porkbun LLC and hosted on Cloudflare, Inc https://whois.eurid.eu/en/search/?domain=only-eu MX points to route1.mx.cloudflare.net as well. they should use their own product before giving others advice.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters also challenge the &amp;#34;European superiority&amp;#34; narrative, noting that many listed vendors must still comply with the US Cloud Act and pointing to recent controversies regarding Proton&amp;#39;s privacy claims &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47625133&quot; title=&quot;The affiliate information shows that it the website shows mostly / only affiliate offers, and omits (intentionally?) much better a lternatives like posteo.de for email.  Listed vendors like OVHcloud must follow the US cloud act, so not really independent from US. Just advertising, no real privacy focused.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47625077&quot; title=&quot;Home page boldly claims: EuRopE dOeS iT BeTtEr. There is literally a story trending on HN right now: Proton built Proton Meet to escape the CLOUD Act. They built it on CLOUD Act infrastructure. Their website promises &amp;#39;not even government agencies&amp;#39; can access your calls. The company routing them hands your call records to the government when asked. Proton hid them from their privacy policy. This superiority complex needs to stop. Source:…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, there is significant disagreement over the definition of &amp;#34;European,&amp;#34; with users questioning whether the term refers to geographic, political, or EU-specific boundaries &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47625266&quot; title=&quot;I find it somewhat odd that &amp;#39;European software/servers&amp;#39; has taken off for what is clearly political purposes, but without any clear definition of what &amp;#39;Europe&amp;#39; even means. How can you claim that &amp;#39;Made in Europe has stood for top quality and durability&amp;#39; if &amp;#39;Europe&amp;#39; is defined based on current political allegiance, not geography? In fact, the domain &amp;#39;only-eu.eu&amp;#39; and the title, &amp;#39;European&amp;#39; are contradictory. Belarus and most population of Russia are unquestionable European, but not EU and clearly…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://gist.github.com/greenstevester/fc49b4e60a4fef9effc79066c1033ae5&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;April 2026 TLDR Setup for Ollama and Gemma 4 26B on a Mac mini&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (gist.github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47624731&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;319 points · 119 comments · by greenstevester&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This guide details how to set up Ollama and Gemma 4 on Apple Silicon Mac minis, providing instructions for installation, auto-starting the application, and using launch agents to keep models preloaded in memory for faster performance. &lt;a href=&quot;https://gist.github.com/greenstevester/fc49b4e60a4fef9effc79066c1033ae5&quot; title=&quot;Title: April 2026 TLDR setup for Ollama + Gemma 4 12B on a Mac mini (Apple Silicon) — auto-start, preload, and keep-alive    URL Source: https://gist.github.com/greenstevester/fc49b4e60a4fef9effc79066c1033ae5    Markdown Content:  # April 2026 TLDR setup for Ollama + Gemma 4 12B on a Mac mini (Apple Silicon) — auto-start, preload, and keep-alive · GitHub    [Skip to content](https://gist.github.com/greenstevester/fc49b4e60a4fef9effc79066c1033ae5#start-of-content)    [](https://gist.github.com/)     Search…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion reveals a strong divide over inference tools, with several users arguing that Ollama is a &amp;#34;dumbed down&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;shameless&amp;#34; wrapper of llama.cpp and recommending alternatives like LM Studio or Unsloth Studio for better performance and flexibility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47624999&quot; title=&quot;There is virtually no reason to use Ollama over LM Studio or the myriad of other alternatives. Ollama is slower and they started out as a shameless llama.cpp ripoff without giving credit and now they “ported” it to Go which means they’re just vibe code translating llama.cpp, bugs included.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47625115&quot; title=&quot;Why is ollama so many people’s go-to? Genuinely curious, I’ve tried it but it feels overly stripped down / dumbed down vs nearly everything else I’ve used. Lately I’ve been playing with Unsloth Studio and think that’s probably a much better “give it to a beginner” default.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47626098&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think it does, but llama.cpp does, and can load models off HuggingFace directly (so, not limited to ollama&amp;#39;s unofficial model mirror like ollama is). There is no reason to ever use ollama.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Experts caution that early implementations of new models like Gemma 4 are often riddled with bugs in tokenization and quantization, leading to frequent failures in tasks like tool calling &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47627246&quot; title=&quot;If this is your first time using open weight models right after release, know that there are always bugs in the early implementations and even quantizations. Every project races to have support on launch day so they don’t lose users, but the output you get may not be correct. There are already several problems being discovered in tokenizer implementations and quantizations may have problems too if they use imatrix. So you’re going to see a lot of “I tried it but it sucks because it can’t even…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47627298&quot; title=&quot;You seem like you know what you&amp;#39;re talking about... what inference engine should I use? (linux, 4090) I keep having &amp;#39;I tried it but it sucks&amp;#39; issues mostly around tool calling and it&amp;#39;s not clear if it&amp;#39;s the model or ollama. And not one model in particular, any of them really.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47626243&quot; title=&quot;I tested briefly with a MacBook Pro m4 with 36gb. Run in LM Studio with open code as the frontend and it failed over and over on tool calls. Switched back to qwen. Anyone else on similar setup have better luck?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, while some users look to models like Qwen 3.5 for coding tasks, others warn against relying on LLM-generated advice for evaluating brand-new releases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47626718&quot; title=&quot;The article has a few good tips for using Ollama. Perhaps it should note that the Gemma 4 models are not really trained for strong performance with coding agents like OpenCode, Claude Code, pi, etc. The Gemma 4 models are excellent for applications requiring tool use, data extraction to JSON, etc. I asked Gemini Pro about this earlier and Gemini Pro recommended qwen 3.5 models specifically for coding, and backed that up with interesting material on training. This makes sense, and is something…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47627038&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I asked Gemini Pro about this earlier and Gemini Pro recommended qwen 3.5 models specifically for coding, and backed that up with interesting material on training. The Gemma models were literally released yesterday. You can’t ask LLMs for advice on these topics and get accurate information. Please don’t repeat LLM-sourced answers as canonical information&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47630082&quot; title=&quot;Slightly off topic, but question for folks. I&amp;#39;m hoping to replace coding with Claude Sonnet 4.5 with a model with an open source or open weights model. Are any of the models on Ollama.com cloud offering ( https://ollama.com/search?c=cloud ) or any of the models on OpenRouter.ai a close replacement? I know that no model right now matches the full performance and capabilities of Claude Sonnet 4.5, but I want to know how close I can get and with which model(s). If there is a model you say can…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/axios/axios/issues/10636&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Post Mortem: axios NPM supply chain compromise&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47621792&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;285 points · 139 comments · by JeanMeche&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On March 31, 2026, malicious versions of the axios npm package (1.14.1 and 0.30.4) were briefly published after a lead maintainer&amp;#39;s account was compromised, delivering a remote access trojan to users before being removed three hours later. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/axios/axios/issues/10636&quot; title=&quot;Post Mortem: axios npm supply chain compromise · Issue #10636 · axios/axios    Post Mortem: axios npm supply chain compromise Date: March 31, 2026 Author: Jason Saayman Status: Remediation in progress On March 31, 2026, two malicious versions of axios (1.14.1 and 0.30.4) were...    [Skip to content](#start-of-content)    ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [Sign in](/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Faxios%2Faxios%2Fissues%2F10636)    Appearance settings    * Platform      + AI CODE CREATION    …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Axios compromise has reignited debate over NPM’s security model, with some arguing the platform is fundamentally designed to run untrusted code and others calling for mandatory package and commit signing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47622390&quot; title=&quot;Incredible uptick in supply chain attacks over the last few weeks. I feel like npm specifically needs to up their game on SA of malicious code embedded in public projects.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47622498&quot; title=&quot;NPM is designed to let you run untrusted code on your machine. It will never work. There is no game to step up. It&amp;#39;s like asking an ostrich to start flying.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47622976&quot; title=&quot;I ask this on every supply chain security fail: Can we please mandate signing packages? Or at least commits? NPM rejected PRs to support optional signing multiple times more than a decade ago now, and this choice has not aged well. Anyone that cannot take 5 minutes to set up commit signing with a $40 usb smartcard to prevent impersonation has absolutely no business writing widely depended upon FOSS software. Normalized negligence is still negligence.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While critics blame the maintainers for &amp;#34;normalized negligence&amp;#34; regarding security practices, others point out that the Axios team already used OIDC and signed commits; the attack succeeded because a Remote Access Trojan (RAT) allowed the attacker to bypass 2FA and publish malicious versions locally &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47623043&quot; title=&quot;An owner being compromised is absolutely survivable on a responsibly run FOSS project with proper commit/review/push signing. This and every other recent supply chain attack was completely preventable. So much so I am very comfortable victim blaming at this point. This is absolutely on the Axios team. Go setup some smartcards for signing git push/commit and publish those keys widely, and mandate signed merge commits so nothing lands on main without two maintainer sigs, and no more single points…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47623199&quot; title=&quot;Did you investigate the maintainer compromise and publication path? The malicious version was never committed or pushed via git. The maintainer signs his commits, and v1 releases were using OIDC and provenance attestations. The malicious package versions were published locally using the npm cli after the maintainer&amp;#39;s machine was compromised via a RAT; there&amp;#39;s no way for package maintainers to disable/forbid local publication on npmjs. It seems the Axios team was largely practicing what you&amp;#39;re…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47622869&quot; title=&quot;The attacker installed a RAT on the contributor’s machine, so if they had configured TOTP or saved the recovery codes anywhere on that machine, the attacker could defeat 2FA.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, consensus is split on whether the responsibility lies with NPM to forbid local publishing, maintainers to adopt hardware tokens, or users to stop relying on unsigned code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47622610&quot; title=&quot;It’s far from a complete solution, but to mitigate this specific avenue of supply chain compromise, couldn’t Github/npm issue single-purpose physical hardware tokens and allow projects (or even mandate, for the most popular ones) maintainers use these hardware tokens as a form of 2FA?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47623027&quot; title=&quot;Is the onus really on people who write code here? It really should be on those who choose to use this unsigned code, surely?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47623199&quot; title=&quot;Did you investigate the maintainer compromise and publication path? The malicious version was never committed or pushed via git. The maintainer signs his commits, and v1 releases were using OIDC and provenance attestations. The malicious package versions were published locally using the npm cli after the maintainer&amp;#39;s machine was compromised via a RAT; there&amp;#39;s no way for package maintainers to disable/forbid local publication on npmjs. It seems the Axios team was largely practicing what you&amp;#39;re…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jpmens.net/2026/04/03/ssh-certificates-the-better-ssh-experience/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SSH certificates: the better SSH experience&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jpmens.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47624811&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;259 points · 124 comments · by jandeboevrie&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SSH certificates offer a more secure and scalable alternative to traditional SSH key pairs by using a central Certificate Authority to eliminate &amp;#34;Trust on First Use&amp;#34; warnings, automate host verification, and enforce granular access controls like expiration times and specific user permissions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jpmens.net/2026/04/03/ssh-certificates-the-better-ssh-experience/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Jan-Piet Mens    URL Source: https://jpmens.net/2026/04/03/ssh-certificates-the-better-ssh-experience/    Published Time: Fri, 03 Apr 2026 15:18:41 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Jan-Piet Mens :: SSH certificates: the better SSH experience    *   [![Image 1: Atom](https://jpmens.net/inc/feed.png)](https://jpmens.net/atom.xml)  *   [Search](https://jpmens.net/2026/04/03/ssh-certificates-the-better-ssh-experience/# &amp;#39;grep&amp;#39;)   *   [Pages](https://jpmens.net/pages/index.html &amp;#39;more&amp;#39;)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While SSH certificates are praised for eliminating manual key management and Trust On First Use (TOFU) risks, critics argue the setup complexity is a significant barrier &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47626335&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve known SSH certs for a while but never went through the effort of migrating away from keys. I&amp;#39;m very frustrated about manually managing my SSH keys across my different servers and devices though. I assume you gathered a lot of thoughts over these 15 years. Should I invest in making the switch?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47626814&quot; title=&quot;The author lists all the advantes of CA certificates, yet doesn&amp;#39;t list the disadvantages. OTOH, all the many steps required to set it up make the disadvantages rather obvious. Also, I&amp;#39;ve never had a security issue due to TOFU, have you?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. A major point of contention is the management of revocation lists, though some suggest that using short-lived certificates can bypass this issue &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628040&quot; title=&quot;All those articles about SSH certificates fall short of explaining how the revocation list can/should be published. Is that yet another problem that I need to solve with syncthing? https://man.openbsd.org/ssh-keygen.1#KEY_REVOCATION_LISTS&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628269&quot; title=&quot;If you generate short lived certificates via an automated process/service then you don’t really need to manage a revocation list as they will have expired in short order.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. However, reliance on short-lived certificates introduces concerns regarding system availability and the need for a highly available signing service &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628547&quot; title=&quot;But then you can&amp;#39;t log in if your box goes offline for any reason.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628614&quot; title=&quot;Hmm. For user certs you can have the service sign them for, say an hour, so long as you can ssh to your server in that time then there’s no need for any other interaction. Sure you need your signing service to be reasonably available, but that’s easily accomplished. Maybe I misunderstand?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.politico.eu/article/fatal-decision-eu-slammed-for-caving-to-us-pressure-on-digital-rules/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Critics say EU risks ceding control of its tech laws under U.S. pressure&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (politico.eu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47625244&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;240 points · 140 comments · by nickslaughter02&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;EU lawmakers are criticizing the European Commission for proposing a &amp;#34;dialogue&amp;#34; with Washington on digital rules, warning it allows the Trump administration to interfere with the enforcement of the bloc&amp;#39;s flagship tech laws. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.politico.eu/article/fatal-decision-eu-slammed-for-caving-to-us-pressure-on-digital-rules/&quot; title=&quot;Title: ‘Fatal decision’: EU slammed for caving to US pressure on digital rules    URL Source: https://www.politico.eu/article/fatal-decision-eu-slammed-for-caving-to-us-pressure-on-digital-rules/    Published Time: 2026-04-01T18:55:13Z    Markdown Content:  # ‘Fatal decision’: EU slammed for caving to US pressure on digital rules – POLITICO  [Skip to main…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on the efficacy of the EU&amp;#39;s regulatory approach, with some arguing that fines have failed to govern American megacorps and suggesting that banning them or &amp;#34;jailbreaking&amp;#34; their ecosystems may be the only viable path forward &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47626526&quot; title=&quot;After decades of trying and broadly failing to regulate American tech corps, at what point does the EU admit that leveling fines against Meta will never stop Meta from being Meta, that American megacorps are essentially ungovernable in Europe (or elsewhere for that matter) and the best course of action is to ban and block them in Europe? Just more fines. Bigger fines, surely this will work eventually... It&amp;#39;s been 20 years, its not working.  A new approach is needed.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47627078&quot; title=&quot;This talk from Cory Doctorow made the rounds on HN when it happened: https://pluralistic.net/2026/01/01/39c3/#the-new-coalition In it he espouses going a little further. He posits that other countries should repeal their versions of the DMCA and just start jailbreaking American megacorps&amp;#39; app stores, hardware, software, etc. and providing their own, much cheaper (or free) versions. Free trade has already broken down, what do they have to lose? As you might guess he puts it a lot better than I…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a notable tension between EU institutions, as critics claim the Commission often prioritizes quiet deals over the public&amp;#39;s rights and sovereignty, potentially aligning with US interests on mass surveillance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47625806&quot; title=&quot;Specifically, this is another Parliament vs Commission issue. The Commission loves to have little deals away from the public where everything is quietly smoothed over, while the Parliament is trying to build popular legitimacy.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47626302&quot; title=&quot;Also, I&amp;#39;m not sure there&amp;#39;s much pressure involved. Mass surveillance is a thing &amp;#39;centrist&amp;#39; EU politicians very much want themselves.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47627265&quot; title=&quot;The European Commission and Council are becoming increasingly unpopular among my peers. Sentiment towards the Parliament is generally still positive. But it&amp;#39;s clear that two thirds of the Trilogue essentially don&amp;#39;t give a shit about European people, their rights, their freedoms or their wellbeing. Things like Age Verification and Chat Control are going to blow up in their faces. I don&amp;#39;t get how blind these institutions are.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Meanwhile, the debate touches on cultural friction, with some defending European standards against what they perceive as a &amp;#34;degraded&amp;#34; American corporate culture &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47625755&quot; title=&quot;I continue to find it bizarre that some Americans are offended that Europeans do not want to be dragged into the American corporate surveillance, advertising, and consumption cult. Will nothing be sovereign until Europe is also littered with personal injury attorney billboards, broadcasting pharmaceutical ads, and other pox marks of a degraded culture? Why search for a better way when you can normalize awful (because it&amp;#39;s more profitable).&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47625886&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; personal injury attorney &amp;gt; ... a degraded culture Do matters of personal injury liability not apply in Europe?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bigtechnology.com/p/iran-strikes-leave-amazon-availability&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Iran strikes leave Amazon availability zones &amp;quot;hard down&amp;quot; in Bahrain and Dubai&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bigtechnology.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632503&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;245 points · 122 comments · by upofadown&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Iranian missile strikes have severely damaged Amazon Web Services infrastructure in Bahrain and Dubai, leaving multiple availability zones &amp;#34;hard down&amp;#34; and forcing the company to migrate customers to other regions for an extended period. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bigtechnology.com/p/iran-strikes-leave-amazon-availability&quot; title=&quot;Title: Iran Strikes Leave Amazon Availability Zones “Hard Down” in Bahrain and Dubai, Per Internal AWS Communication    URL Source: https://www.bigtechnology.com/p/iran-strikes-leave-amazon-availability    Published Time: 2026-04-03T19:34:30+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Iran Strikes Leave Amazon Availability Zones “Hard Down” in Bahrain and Dubai, Per Internal AWS Communication    [![Image 1: Big…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The recent strikes on Amazon data centers have sparked a debate on the vulnerability of centralized cloud infrastructure, which some argue is now a primary strategic target due to the military&amp;#39;s increasing reliance on AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632971&quot; title=&quot;This may have been long discussed, but I feel like this war is the first time I&amp;#39;ve really thought hard about how big a target data centers would be in any sort of modern peer war and how that&amp;#39;s an entirely new thing since the last time it was really on the radar (end of CW) right? We&amp;#39;ve built trillions and trillions of dollars in infrastructure in the peace time since, and it seems fairly concentrated. AWS is amongst the biggest there is, and according to mappers like [0] there are only around…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47633047&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; the first time I&amp;#39;ve really thought hard about how big a target data centers would be in any sort of modern peer war Given the rapid and increasing rise of AI use in actually fighting wars, I suspect data centers won&amp;#39;t just be a big target, they will eventually be the #1 priority target.  Taking them offline won&amp;#39;t just be of interest in terms of economic damage, it will be a direct strategic goal toward militarily winning the conflict.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest that targeting electrical substations is a more efficient way to disable these facilities, others note that physical destruction of the hardware itself would create a &amp;#34;soft underbelly&amp;#34; for modern society that is far more difficult to recover from than a temporary power outage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47633140&quot; title=&quot;Instead of targeting data center itself, it&amp;#39;s far easier to target the electrical substation that powers the datacenter. It&amp;#39;s relatively simple to do. Transformers require oil to cool themselves, and if the coolant reservoir is damaged, then they overheat and shut off. This exact infrastructure attack occurred in North Carolina in 2022 [0], where someone fired bullets into the coolant reservoirs and caused a several day power outage. The perpetrator was never caught. It&amp;#39;s speculated a foreign…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47633291&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Instead of targeting data centers, it&amp;#39;s far easier to target the electrical substation that powers the datacenter That has a lot of collateral damage that may or may not be desirable though. Simultaneously it might have quite a different long term effect right? If all the actual computers are unharmed they can be powered in other ways in an emergency, even if at much higher cost. Or powered back up later, the time lost might be militarily very significant but they&amp;#39;re not gone. But how many…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While blast-resistant construction is common in industries like oil refining, experts suggest that protecting above-ground data centers against sustained bombardment is commercially prohibitive, leaving underground facilities as the only viable long-term defense &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47634307&quot; title=&quot;Building blast resistant is a common practices for Refinery control rooms. The same methodologies can be employed for data centers as well. 1 blast can be expensively  guarded againt. However designing anything above ground for sustained barges is practically/commercially prohibitive. Underground is only option. PS: Civil Engineer. Designed few of those Gas explosion resistant control rooms.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-04-02</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-04-02</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://browsergate.eu/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LinkedIn is searching your browser extensions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (browsergate.eu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47613981&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1882 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 758 comments · by digitalWestie&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Legal proceedings have been filed against LinkedIn for allegedly using hidden code to illegally scan users&amp;#39; browser extensions to collect personal data and trade secrets for corporate espionage. &lt;a href=&quot;https://browsergate.eu/&quot; title=&quot;Title: LinkedIn Is Illegally Searching Your Computer    URL Source: https://browsergate.eu/    Published Time: Sun, 29 Mar 2026 17:55:47 GMT    Markdown Content:  # BrowserGate    **Update:** Legal proceedings against LinkedIn under the DMA have been filed. [Read updates here!](https://browsergate.eu/updates/)    [covered](https://browsergate.eu/)    [Take action now!](https://browsergate.eu/take-action/)    *   [LinkedIn BrowserGate](https://browsergate.eu/ &amp;#39;LinkedIn Is Illegally Searching Your Computer&amp;#39;)    …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LinkedIn&amp;#39;s practice of scanning for thousands of browser extension IDs has sparked a debate over whether the behavior is a standard fingerprinting technique for bot detection or a &amp;#34;sinister&amp;#34; privacy violation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47614309&quot; title=&quot;The headline seems pretty misleading. Here’s what seems to actually be going on: &amp;gt; Every time you open LinkedIn in a Chrome-based browser, LinkedIn’s JavaScript executes a silent scan of your installed browser extensions. The scan probes for thousands of specific extensions by ID, collects the results, encrypts them, and transmits them to LinkedIn’s servers. This does seem invasive. It also seems like what I’d expect to find in modern browser fingerprinting code. I’m not deeply familiar with…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47614875&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; How is probing your browser for installed extensions not &amp;#39;scanning your computer&amp;#39;? I think most people would interpret “scanning your computer” as breaking out of the confines the browser and gathering information from the computer itself. If this was happening, the magnitude of the scandal would be hard to overstate. But this is not happening. What actually is happening is still a problem. But the hyperbole undermines what they’re trying to communicate and this is why I objected to the…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the headline is hyperbolic because the scan remains within the browser sandbox, others contend that identifying sensitive tools—such as Islamic content filters or neurodivergent aids—constitutes a massive violation of trust &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47614585&quot; title=&quot;How is probing your browser for installed extensions not &amp;#39;scanning your computer&amp;#39;? Calling the title misleading because they didn&amp;#39;t breach the browser sandbox is wrong when this is clearly a scenario most people didn&amp;#39;t think was possible. Chrome added extensionId randomization with the change to V3, so it&amp;#39;s clearly not an intended scenario. &amp;gt; vs. something inherently sinister (e.g. “they’re checking to see if you’re a Muslim”) They chose to put that particular extension in their target list,…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47614875&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; How is probing your browser for installed extensions not &amp;#39;scanning your computer&amp;#39;? I think most people would interpret “scanning your computer” as breaking out of the confines the browser and gathering information from the computer itself. If this was happening, the magnitude of the scandal would be hard to overstate. But this is not happening. What actually is happening is still a problem. But the hyperbole undermines what they’re trying to communicate and this is why I objected to the…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47614288&quot; title=&quot;this is a massive violation of trust &amp;gt; The scan doesn’t just look for LinkedIn-related tools. It identifies whether you use an Islamic content filter (PordaAI — “Blur Haram objects, real-time AI for Islamic values”), whether you’ve installed an anti-Zionist political tagger (Anti-Zionist Tag), or a tool designed for neurodivergent users (simplify).&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion highlights a broader frustration with the lack of browser permissions for such probes and the necessity of ad blockers, which even the FBI now recommends for basic protection &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47614778&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; this is why I run ad blockers. It&amp;#39;s pretty wild that we live in a world where the actual FBI has recommended we use ad blockers to protect ourselves, and if everyone actually listened, much of the Internet (and economy) as we know it would disappear.  The FBI is like &amp;#39;you should protect yourself from the way that the third largest company in the world does business&amp;#39;, and the average person&amp;#39;s response is &amp;#39;nah, that would take at least a couple of minutes of my time, I&amp;#39;ll just go ahead and…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47614417&quot; title=&quot;Why is it possible for a web site to determine what browser extensions I have installed? If there are legitimate uses, why isn&amp;#39;t this gated behind a permission prompt, like things like location and camera?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://deepmind.google/models/gemma/gemma-4/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Google releases Gemma 4 open models&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (deepmind.google)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616361&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1794 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 469 comments · by jeffmcjunkin&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google DeepMind has released Gemma 4, a new generation of open AI models featuring multimodal reasoning, agentic workflows, and support for 140 languages. The lineup includes efficient E2B and E4B models for mobile devices alongside high-performance 26B and 31B versions optimized for consumer GPUs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://deepmind.google/models/gemma/gemma-4/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Gemma 4    URL Source: https://deepmind.google/models/gemma/gemma-4/    Markdown Content:  # Gemma 4 — Google DeepMind    [Skip to main content](https://deepmind.google/models/gemma/gemma-4/#page-content)    ## Explore our next generation AI systems    [Explore models](https://deepmind.google/models/)    Gemini    [![Image 1](https://storage.googleapis.com/gdm-deepmind-com-prod-public/media/original_images/nav__dm__gemini__large.svg) Gemini Learn, build, and plan…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google’s release of Gemma 4 introduces open models featuring reasoning traces, multimodality, and tool calling, with the 26B-A4B version specifically praised for its performance on consumer hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616439&quot; title=&quot;Thinking / reasoning + multimodal + tool calling. We made some quants at https://huggingface.co/collections/unsloth/gemma-4 for folks to run them - they work really well! Guide for those interested: https://unsloth.ai/docs/models/gemma-4 Also note to use temperature = 1.0, top_p = 0.95, top_k = 64 and the EOS is &amp;#39; &amp;#39;. &amp;#39;&amp;lt;|channel&amp;gt;thought\n&amp;#39; is also used for the thinking trace!&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47617370&quot; title=&quot;I ran these in LM Studio and got unrecognizable pelicans out of the 2B and 4B models and an outstanding pelican out of the 26b-a4b model - I think the best I&amp;#39;ve seen from a model that runs on my laptop. https://simonwillison.net/2026/Apr/2/gemma-4/ The gemma-4-31b model is completely broken for me - it just spits out &amp;#39;---\n&amp;#39; no matter what prompt I feed it. I got a pelican out of it via the AI Studio API hosted model instead.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47619651&quot; title=&quot;Prompt: &amp;gt; what is the Unix timestamp for this: 2026-04-01T16:00:00Z Qwen 3.5-27b-dwq &amp;gt; Thought for 8 minutes 34 seconds. 7074 tokens. &amp;gt; The Unix timestamp for 2026-04-01T16:00:00Z is: &amp;gt; 1775059200 (my comment: Wednesday, 1 April 2026 at 16:00:00) Gemma-4-26b-a4b &amp;gt; Thought for 33.81 seconds. 694 tokens. &amp;gt; The Unix timestamp for 2026-04-01T16:00:00Z is: &amp;gt; 1775060800 (my comment: Wednesday, 1 April 2026 at 16:26:40) Gemma considered three options to solve this problem. From the thinking trace: &amp;gt;…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users celebrate Google&amp;#39;s hardware and data advantages &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616790&quot; title=&quot;Google might not have the best coding models (yet) but they seem to have the most intelligent and knowledgeable models of all especially Gemini 3.1 Pro is something. One more thing about Google is that they have everything that others do not: 1. Huge data, audio, video, geospatial  2. Tons of expertise. Attention all you need was born there.  3. Libraries that they wrote.  4. Their own data centers and cloud.  4. Most of all, their own hardware TPUs that no one has. Therefore once the bubble…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others find the release disappointing, noting that the models struggle with tool execution and trail behind competitors like Qwen 3.5 in dense model benchmarks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47619651&quot; title=&quot;Prompt: &amp;gt; what is the Unix timestamp for this: 2026-04-01T16:00:00Z Qwen 3.5-27b-dwq &amp;gt; Thought for 8 minutes 34 seconds. 7074 tokens. &amp;gt; The Unix timestamp for 2026-04-01T16:00:00Z is: &amp;gt; 1775059200 (my comment: Wednesday, 1 April 2026 at 16:00:00) Gemma-4-26b-a4b &amp;gt; Thought for 33.81 seconds. 694 tokens. &amp;gt; The Unix timestamp for 2026-04-01T16:00:00Z is: &amp;gt; 1775060800 (my comment: Wednesday, 1 April 2026 at 16:26:40) Gemma considered three options to solve this problem. From the thinking trace: &amp;gt;…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616709&quot; title=&quot;Featuring the ELO score as the main benchmark in chart is very misleading. The big dense Gemma 4 model does not seem to reach Qwen 3.5 27B dense model in most benchmarks. This is obviously what matters. The small 2B / 4B models are interesting and may potentially be better ASR models than specialized ones (not just for performances but since they are going to be easily served via llama.cpp / MLX and front-ends). Also interesting for &amp;#39;fast&amp;#39; OCR, given they are vision models as well. But other…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616761&quot; title=&quot;Comparison of Gemma 4 vs. Qwen 3.5 benchmarks, consolidated from their respective Hugging Face model cards: | Model          | MMLUP | GPQA  | LCB   | ELO  | TAU2  | MMMLU | HLE-n | HLE-t |      |----------------|-------|-------|-------|------|-------|-------|-------|-------|      | G4 31B         | 85.2% | 84.3% | 80.0% | 2150 | 76.9% | 88.4% | 19.5% | 26.5% |      | G4 26B A4B     | 82.6% | 82.3% | 77.1% | 1718 | 68.2% | 86.3% |  8.7% | 17.2% |      | G4 E4B         | 69.4% | 58.6% | 52.0% |  940…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical issues were also reported, including broken outputs in the 31B model and &amp;#34;unrecognizable&amp;#34; results from smaller versions in certain local environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47617370&quot; title=&quot;I ran these in LM Studio and got unrecognizable pelicans out of the 2B and 4B models and an outstanding pelican out of the 26b-a4b model - I think the best I&amp;#39;ve seen from a model that runs on my laptop. https://simonwillison.net/2026/Apr/2/gemma-4/ The gemma-4-31b model is completely broken for me - it just spits out &amp;#39;---\n&amp;#39; no matter what prompt I feed it. I got a pelican out of it via the AI Studio API hosted model instead.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://isolveproblems.substack.com/p/how-microsoft-vaporized-a-trillion&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Decisions that eroded trust in Azure – by a former Azure Core engineer&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (isolveproblems.substack.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616242&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1267 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 641 comments · by axelriet&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A former Azure engineer claims Microsoft jeopardized its market value and government trust through technical mismanagement, specifically by attempting to port over 100 inefficient Windows management agents onto underpowered hardware accelerators, leading to a &amp;#34;death march&amp;#34; that threatened the stability of critical infrastructure and major clients like OpenAI. &lt;a href=&quot;https://isolveproblems.substack.com/p/how-microsoft-vaporized-a-trillion&quot; title=&quot;Title: How Microsoft Vaporized a Trillion Dollars    URL Source: https://isolveproblems.substack.com/p/how-microsoft-vaporized-a-trillion    Published Time: 2026-03-29T11:27:06+00:00    Markdown Content:  This is the first of a series of articles in which you will learn about what may be one of the silliest, most preventable, and most costly mishaps of the 21st century, where Microsoft all but lost OpenAI, its largest customer, and the trust of the US government.    I joined Azure Core on the dull…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion is divided between users who find the author’s claims of systemic instability and security risks credible and critics who view the post as a dramatized grievance from a mid-level engineer &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47620989&quot; title=&quot;The post is so dramatized and clearly written by someone with a grudge such that it really detracts from any point that is trying to be made, if there is any. From another former Az eng now elsewhere still working on big systems, the post gets way way more boring when you realize that things like &amp;#39;Principle Group Manager&amp;#39; is just an M2 and Principal in general is L6 (maybe even L5) Google equivalent. Similarly Sev2 is hardly notable for anyone actually working on the foundational infra. There…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47620435&quot; title=&quot;What are we reading here? These are extraordinary statements. Also with apparent credibility. They sound reasonable. Is this a whistleblower or an ex employee with a grudge? The appearance is the first. Is it? They’ve put their name to some clear and worrying statements. &amp;gt; On January 7, 2025… I sent a more concise executive summary to the CEO. … When those communications produced no acknowledgment, I took the customary step of writing to the Board through the corporate secretary. Why is that…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47619212&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The direct corollary is that any successful compromise of the host can give an attacker access to the complete memory of every VM running on that node. Keeping the host secure is therefore critical. &amp;gt; In that context, hosting a web service that is directly reachable from any guest VM and running it on the secure host side created a significantly larger attack surface than I expected. That is quite scary&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that Azure’s &amp;#34;rough edges&amp;#34; are expected for its scale, many users report firsthand experiences with a &amp;#34;janky&amp;#34; UI, unreliable documentation, and unpredictable performance issues in services like AKS and Blob Tables &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47620989&quot; title=&quot;The post is so dramatized and clearly written by someone with a grudge such that it really detracts from any point that is trying to be made, if there is any. From another former Az eng now elsewhere still working on big systems, the post gets way way more boring when you realize that things like &amp;#39;Principle Group Manager&amp;#39; is just an M2 and Principal in general is L6 (maybe even L5) Google equivalent. Similarly Sev2 is hardly notable for anyone actually working on the foundational infra. There…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47621010&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know if any of this is true, but as a user of Azure every day this would explain so much. The Azure UI feels like a janky mess, barely being held together. The documentation is obviously entirely written by AI and is constantly out of date or wrong. They offer such a huge volume of services it&amp;#39;s nearly impossible to figure out what service you actually want/need without consultants, and when you finally get the services up who knows if they actually work as advertised. I&amp;#39;m honestly…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47621405&quot; title=&quot;We migrated some services to AKS because the upper management thought it was a good deal to get so many credits, and now pods are randomly crashing and database nodes have random spikes in disk latency. What ran reliably on GCP became quite unpredictable.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47621620&quot; title=&quot;Interesting!  We&amp;#39;re using AKS with huge success so far, but lately our Pods are unresponsive and we get 503 Gateway Timeouts that we really can&amp;#39;t trace down.  And don&amp;#39;t get me started on Azure Blob Tables...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite disagreements over the author&amp;#39;s decision to escalate concerns to the Board, some participants point to broader criticisms of Microsoft’s leadership and national security posture as validation for the whistleblower&amp;#39;s alarm &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47620435&quot; title=&quot;What are we reading here? These are extraordinary statements. Also with apparent credibility. They sound reasonable. Is this a whistleblower or an ex employee with a grudge? The appearance is the first. Is it? They’ve put their name to some clear and worrying statements. &amp;gt; On January 7, 2025… I sent a more concise executive summary to the CEO. … When those communications produced no acknowledgment, I took the customary step of writing to the Board through the corporate secretary. Why is that…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47621601&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; risks to national security …really? Really. Apparently the Secretary of War agrees with him.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47619705&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;For fiscal 2025, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella earned total pay of $96.5 million, up 22% from a year earlier.&amp;#39; -CNBC.com and &amp;#39;I also see I have 2 instances of Outlook, and neither of those are working.&amp;#39; -Artemis II astronaut&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://undark.org/2026/04/01/sweden-schools-books/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sweden goes back to basics, swapping screens for books in the classroom&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (undark.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47612601&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;900 points · 432 comments · by novaRom&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sweden is pivoting back to physical books, handwriting, and cellphone-free classrooms after declining test scores raised concerns that the rapid digitalization of schools eroded foundational skills like deep reading and sustained attention. &lt;a href=&quot;https://undark.org/2026/04/01/sweden-schools-books/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Why Swedish Schools Are Bringing Back Books    URL Source: https://undark.org/2026/04/01/sweden-schools-books/    Published Time: 2026-04-01T07:21:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Why Swedish Schools Are Bringing Back Books     Close     ### Join the Discussion [Cancel reply](https://undark.org/2026/04/01/sweden-schools-books/#respond)    Add a Comment    Name *    Email *    - [x] Save my information    Post Comment    Δ     Close     ### Republish    ![Image 2: Undark…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a growing consensus that replacing physical books and handwriting with digital screens in schools has been a mistake, with experts and parents noting that paper-based learning improves cognitive development and prevents distractions like social media &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47612836&quot; title=&quot;A very similar development is going on in neighboring Finland. There are schools that use almost exclusively paper books (instead of digital ones) again. The overall consensus among parents is that books are way better than screens for kids, all the way up to high school. Hand-writing and free drawing with pen and paper provide many advantages to fixed screens. You cannot open a new tab to Youtube in a book. The significance of these things is finally recognized now. Parents are also worried…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615163&quot; title=&quot;I worked in EdTech about a decade ago and our education/pedagogy experts were already talking about this. They also talked a lot about how handwriting is super important for cognitive development. After working on that company for a couple of years I realized using tech in education (pre university) was a mistake. One of the reasons I left. In a decade or two the long term consequences of inundating kids with tech and then removing it will be quite obvious. This will be studied for decades to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that tech executives&amp;#39; personal restrictions on their children&amp;#39;s screen time highlight the dangers of these products &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47613112&quot; title=&quot;I remember that - even though Steve Jobs promoted the iPad as a replacement to the &amp;#39;heavy schoolbooks kids had to carry all day&amp;#39; - he never allowed his children to use iPads. I bet Zuckerberg doesn&amp;#39;t allow his children to use social media. And I assume that Sam Altman won&amp;#39;t allow his children to use AI chatbots. What does that tell us?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend this is simply responsible parenting rather than hypocrisy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47613782&quot; title=&quot;It tells us nothing. People act like this is some big hypocrisy or revelation. First of all, Jobs DID allow his children to use iPads, but it was limited. People take a single quote from the Isaacson biography out of context, assuming that he never let his children have access to iPads at all, forever. Other interviews he gave talked about limiting access - like ALL families should do. Jobs was literally just parenting. Limiting screen time is something all parents should do. We also limit…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Most commenters agree that while basic technical literacy and &amp;#34;AI workflows&amp;#34; are important, they should be taught as specific subjects rather than integrated into core disciplines like math or history &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47612836&quot; title=&quot;A very similar development is going on in neighboring Finland. There are schools that use almost exclusively paper books (instead of digital ones) again. The overall consensus among parents is that books are way better than screens for kids, all the way up to high school. Hand-writing and free drawing with pen and paper provide many advantages to fixed screens. You cannot open a new tab to Youtube in a book. The significance of these things is finally recognized now. Parents are also worried…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615496&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;I realized using tech in education (pre university) was a mistake. I think we should use tech in education, but in a targeted way. It&amp;#39;s important that children gain basic technical literacy, like how to touch type and use basic software. I suspect there is a gap in the technical literacy of lower income students, whose parents are less likely to have a computer at home. The real problem is separating reading/writing skills from tech skills. We shouldn&amp;#39;t stop teaching handwriting just because…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616571&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s not using tech that you&amp;#39;re describing here. You&amp;#39;re talking about literally learning some basic computer skills (such as word processor, excel, reading email, some basic website building, use printer, and some amount of programming) For those, obviously you need a computer and completely agree that those are important skills to learn... But you maybe need to spend 1h/week during last 2 years of middle school on those at the computer lab (as it&amp;#39;s been done since the 90s in many schools…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.phoronix.com/news/Steam-On-Linux-Tops-5p&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Steam on Linux Use Skyrocketed Above 5% in March&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (phoronix.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47609564&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;781 points · 365 comments · by hkmaxpro&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Steam use on Linux reached an all-time high of 5.33% in March 2026, more than doubling the market share of macOS following a correction in data from China. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.phoronix.com/news/Steam-On-Linux-Tops-5p&quot; title=&quot;Title: Steam On Linux Use Skyrocketed In March - More Than Double The macOS Gaming Marketshare    URL Source: https://www.phoronix.com/news/Steam-On-Linux-Tops-5p    Markdown Content:  # Steam On Linux Use Skyrocketed In March - More Than Double The macOS Gaming Marketshare - Phoronix    [![Image 1: Phoronix](https://www.phoronix.com/phxcms7-css/phoronix.png)](https://www.phoronix.com/)    [](https://www.phoronix.com/rss.php)[](https://x.com/Phoronix)[](https://www.facebook.com/Phoronix)    *   [Articles…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Steam&amp;#39;s reported Linux market share has surpassed 5%, some users argue the data is unreliable due to frequent &amp;#34;corrections&amp;#34; and sampling biases in the Steam Hardware Survey &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47609818&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve probably said this a bunch of times already, but based on my past experience, any analysis built on month-to-month changes in the Steam Hardware Survey should be taken with a very large grain of salt, if not considered outright useless for any serious conclusions. The clue is already in the article itself. The author notes that &amp;#39;part of the jump at least appears to be explained by Valve correcting again the Steam China numbers.&amp;#39; If you actually think about what that implies, it raises more…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47611152&quot; title=&quot;Of the publicly available sources I think CloudFlares Radar is one of the better ones. Silver linings of having such wide dragnet on the internet. It puts Linux market share at 3-4%, with some regional variance https://radar.cloudflare.com/explorer?dataSet=http&amp;amp;groupBy=o... Fun tidbits, Finland is at ~10% (!), and Germany at 6.3%.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite this skepticism, many commenters report that Proton has made gaming on Linux increasingly seamless, even for Windows-only titles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47609796&quot; title=&quot;When Windows 11 was force-installed on my main game development desktop, I was skeptical, but kept using it. I was annoyed at having to turn off all the tracking and noise (like news articles) When it updated and started shoving AI down my throat, with no easy way to turn it off and suddenly lots of data I don&amp;#39;t consent to sharing getting used, 11 became the last Windows OS I&amp;#39;ll ever use. Whenever the next version comes out, Im moving fully to *buntu. My main laptop already uses it and Steam on…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47609887&quot; title=&quot;A few weeks ago, I installed linux (Nobara, if you&amp;#39;re curious) on my PC and hooked it up to the living room TV to use as a gaming console. I have absolutely no regret. I did it initially because apparently playing games on a shared screen is better for my kid. But I was pleasantly surprised by how smoothly Windows only games run on Linux. The whole experience has been great, and I don&amp;#39;t think I&amp;#39;ll ever go back. I have an nvidia gpu as well, which apparently does not work very well on Linux. For…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47609918&quot; title=&quot;to give you a single data point, I&amp;#39;ve finally committed to linux on my desktop machine at home (I posted in another comment on this thread regarding my sim setup, thats another issue), but on the desktop machine, I installed steam, proton, downloaded a few games from my library, and they just worked on install, no stuffing around at all, no searching the web for fixes to get it going. It&amp;#39;s probably been 6 years since I tried it, and last time I tried pretty much every game needed _something_)…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others still face significant technical hurdles with specific hardware configurations or software conflicts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47611597&quot; title=&quot;I wish things were working so seamlessly for me, as people describe in the comments. There seems to be something wrong with Steam and how it works, so that in my machine (and CPU and GPU from 2019, with official Linux drivers from standard repos, running Debian KDE) it almost never manages to start a Windows game. I will click the green &amp;#39;Play&amp;#39; button, it will change to a blue &amp;#39;Stop&amp;#39; button, as if the application was running, then shortly after silently switches back to the green Play button…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47609918&quot; title=&quot;to give you a single data point, I&amp;#39;ve finally committed to linux on my desktop machine at home (I posted in another comment on this thread regarding my sim setup, thats another issue), but on the desktop machine, I installed steam, proton, downloaded a few games from my library, and they just worked on install, no stuffing around at all, no searching the web for fixes to get it going. It&amp;#39;s probably been 6 years since I tried it, and last time I tried pretty much every game needed _something_)…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, and there is debate over whether the Steam Deck&amp;#39;s success should be categorized alongside traditional desktop Linux usage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47609920&quot; title=&quot;SteamDeck should be excluded from “Linux use” imho. Especially when it comes to click bait headlines. Like yes it is Linux. But SteamDeck is a completely different beast from desktop Linux. They might as well be entirely different OS’s. Especially if the SteamDeck is being used to play Win32 binaries!&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cursor.com/blog/cursor-3&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cursor 3&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cursor.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47618084&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;540 points · 401 comments · by adamfeldman&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cursor 3 introduces a unified, agent-centric workspace that allows developers to manage multiple autonomous agents in parallel across different repositories, featuring seamless handoff between local and cloud environments and a new interface built from scratch to support the &amp;#34;third era&amp;#34; of software development. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cursor.com/blog/cursor-3&quot; title=&quot;Title: Meet the new Cursor    URL Source: https://cursor.com/blog/cursor-3    Published Time: 2026-04-02T00:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  Software development is changing, and so is Cursor.    In the last year, we moved from manually editing files to working with agents that write most of our code. How we create software will continue to evolve as we enter the [third era of software development](https://cursor.com/blog/third-era), where fleets of agents work autonomously to ship improvements.    We&amp;#39;re…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The latest Cursor update signals a shift toward a &amp;#34;vibe-first&amp;#34; chat interface and multi-agent swarms, a move some users believe is driven by the need to satisfy venture capital demands rather than developer preferences &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47618253&quot; title=&quot;Man, I wish they&amp;#39;d keep the old philosophy of letting the developer drive and the agent assist. I feel like this design direction is leaning more towards a chat interface as a first class citizen and the code itself as a secondary concern. I really don&amp;#39;t like that. Even when I&amp;#39;m using AI agents to write code, I still find myself spending most of my time reading and reasoning about code. Showing me little snippets of my repo in a chat window and changes made by the agent in a PR type visual does…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47618839&quot; title=&quot;My guess would be this is less driven by product philosophy, more driven by trying to maximise chances of a return on a very large amount of funding in an incredibly tough market up against formidable, absurdly well-funded competitors. It&amp;#39;s a very tough spot they&amp;#39;re in. They have a great product in the code-first philosophy, but it may turn out it&amp;#39;s too small a market where the margins will just be competed away to zero by open source, leaving only opportunity for the first-party model…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47620712&quot; title=&quot;You know, it’s stuff like this making me think maybe the anti capitalists have a point. A company makes a popular product customers like, but to satisfy the VCs the company must make a product the customers don’t like but could make the VCs more money. Not sure this is the “invisible hand” Adam Smith had in mind.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some critics argue this design obscures the code and disrupts the &amp;#34;flow state&amp;#34; of reasoning through a codebase, others embrace the higher abstraction of agents to manage boredom and increase throughput &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47618253&quot; title=&quot;Man, I wish they&amp;#39;d keep the old philosophy of letting the developer drive and the agent assist. I feel like this design direction is leaning more towards a chat interface as a first class citizen and the code itself as a secondary concern. I really don&amp;#39;t like that. Even when I&amp;#39;m using AI agents to write code, I still find myself spending most of my time reading and reasoning about code. Showing me little snippets of my repo in a chat window and changes made by the agent in a PR type visual does…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47619752&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been running Claude Code in my Cursor IDE for a while now via extension. I like the setup, and I direct Claude on one task at a time, while still having full access to my code (and nice completions via Cursor). I still spend time tweaking, etc. before committing. I have zero interest in these new &amp;#39;swarms of agents&amp;#39; they are trying to force on us from every direction. I can barely keep straight my code working on one feature at a time. AI has greatly helped me speed that up, but working…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47619823&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; have zero interest in these new &amp;#39;swarms of agents&amp;#39; they are trying to force on us from every direction. Good for you! Personally waiting for one agent to do something while I shove my thumb up my butt just waiting around for it to generate code that I&amp;#39;ll have to fix anyway is peak opposite of flow state, so I&amp;#39;ve eagerly adopted agents (how much free will I had in that decision is for philosophers to decide) so there&amp;#39;s just more going on so I don&amp;#39;t get bored. (Cue the inevitable accusations of…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant debate over whether Cursor can maintain its lead as it converges with competitors like Claude Code, which some find more effective for planning-heavy workflows despite lacking a full IDE interface &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47618140&quot; title=&quot;So it has converged to the same UI/UX as the Claude/Codex desktop apps. If that&amp;#39;s the case, why use Cursor over those more canonical apps?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47619702&quot; title=&quot;As a Cursor user who hasn&amp;#39;t tried Claude Code yet, am I missing anything? I seem (sometimes) exceptionally productive in it and it&amp;#39;s working for me. To my understanding, Claude Code is all terminal, but something like an IDE seems like the better interface to me: I want to see the file system, etc. It seems Cursor doesn&amp;#39;t have the mindshare relative to Claude in public discussion spaces.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47619868&quot; title=&quot;Claude Code is where you move up one abstraction layer. Almost everyone using it productively has spend a lot of time working on their harness, ensuring that everything is planned out and structured such that all that is left is really type in the code. This typically works without error. Before that, you interact a lot via Claude Code in whatever abstraction you feel is right. That&amp;#39;s basically it. You can review changes afterwards, but that&amp;#39;s not the main point of Claude Code. It&amp;#39;s a different…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47619961&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Cursor, same as Copilot, has been used by people who are basically pair programming with the AI. So, on abstraction down. This is not really true anymore. Cursor has better cloud agents than Claude. The multi-agent experience is better, the worktree management is better. Tagging specific code or files in chat is better. It&amp;#39;s hard for me to express the level of pain and frustration I feel going from Cursor to Claude / Conductor+Claude / Claude Extension for VS Code, Claude in Zed, etc. Really…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tailscale.com/blog/macos-notch-escape&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tailscale&amp;#39;s new macOS home&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tailscale.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47618189&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;562 points · 309 comments · by tosh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tailscale has launched a windowed macOS interface to ensure the app remains accessible even when its menu bar icon is hidden by the MacBook display notch. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tailscale.com/blog/macos-notch-escape&quot; title=&quot;Title: Escaping the notch: Tailscale&amp;#39;s new macOS home    URL Source: https://tailscale.com/blog/macos-notch-escape    Published Time: 2026-03-27T18:30:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  # How notch traversal works on MacBooks    ![Image 4](https://d.adroll.com/cm/b/out?adroll_fpc=9e00c7bfe8d9277459a6cfede0a2afec-1775196005239&amp;amp;pv=30265128483.145294&amp;amp;arrfrr=https%3A%2F%2Ftailscale.com%2Fblog%2Fmacos-notch-escape&amp;amp;advertisable=TKO7FOASLRCK5J2S4BRIFC)![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a significant flaw in macOS where the &amp;#34;notch&amp;#34; on modern MacBooks physically hides menu bar icons without providing an overflow menu, leading to broken functionality and user confusion &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47618574&quot; title=&quot;I haven&amp;#39;t had enough menu bar icons to run into this but is it really the case that the notch just hides whatever icons happen to be behind it? Like, the OS doesn&amp;#39;t handle this incredibly obvious edge case? Why not just put an overflow dropdown next to the notch (something Windows XP managed to figure out 25 years ago)? I know software quality has been going down in recent versions of macOS but this is absurd.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47619890&quot; title=&quot;If the icons are just hidden and you can&amp;#39;t find them in order to use the programs you have running, that&amp;#39;s not &amp;#39;just working&amp;#39;. That&amp;#39;s broken functionality. Windows has solved this with the overflow menu for literally decades.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47618649&quot; title=&quot;This is genuinely shocking that Apple is not handling that. Talk about quite a decline in one of their flagship products.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Developers report that this design oversight causes a surge in refund requests and support tickets from users who believe apps have failed to launch &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47619626&quot; title=&quot;The notch hiding menubar icons is such a stupid problem to have. I waste hours every week trying to help people who send me frustrated emails because they bought one of my apps and they say: &amp;#39;it doesn&amp;#39;t launch&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;why doesn&amp;#39;t it have any interface??&amp;#39; No amount of FAQ will help these people. And this also results in hasty refund requests and even worse, chargebacks that take 2x the amount the users paid out of my pocket. I recently helped my brother launch a simple app for making any window a…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that users should simply run fewer background utilities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47621469&quot; title=&quot;The users who run into issues with menubar space would probably be well served to question if they really need all that stuff. The people with the most stuff up there tend to be the same ones who are always complaining about system slowness or weird issues... because they have 2 dozen utilities running in the background that they don&amp;#39;t consider, which are all looking for CPU time or trying to change the default behavior of the OS in conflicting ways. My goal is genially not to have anything…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that Windows solved this issue decades ago and that macOS users must now rely on terminal hacks or third-party apps—some of which are being broken by OS updates—to make the interface usable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47618946&quot; title=&quot;Every time I get a new Mac, I run these commands to reduce the spacing between menu bar icons. Lets you fit at least 2x the number of items in the menu bar. ``` defaults -currentHost write -globalDomain NSStatusItemSpacing -int 2 defaults -currentHost write -globalDomain NSStatusItemSelectionPadding -int 2 ```&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47619511&quot; title=&quot;This was always my biggest gripe about using a mac, the OS that &amp;#39;just works&amp;#39;. I ended up a bunch of commands I had to run and a stack of apps I needed to install for it to feel usable.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47619626&quot; title=&quot;The notch hiding menubar icons is such a stupid problem to have. I waste hours every week trying to help people who send me frustrated emails because they bought one of my apps and they say: &amp;#39;it doesn&amp;#39;t launch&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;why doesn&amp;#39;t it have any interface??&amp;#39; No amount of FAQ will help these people. And this also results in hasty refund requests and even worse, chargebacks that take 2x the amount the users paid out of my pocket. I recently helped my brother launch a simple app for making any window a…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47621437&quot; title=&quot;It will not only cut off icons but the menus for applications when they have a lot of them. There is no way to fix it except to change your scaling or connect a second monitor. I should save this thread for every time someone tries to tell me that Windows is a horrible operating system that is a major reason to not buy a computer when I say things like &amp;#39;The MacBook Neo isn&amp;#39;t that good of a deal and you can totally find a Windows laptop in the price range that&amp;#39;s built well enough, has similar…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bsky.app/profile/nikigrayson.com/post/3miik2wzosk25&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Artemis computer running two instances of MS outlook; they can&amp;#39;t figure out why&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bsky.app)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615490&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;492 points · 361 comments · by mooreds&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NASA ground control is preparing to remote into an Artemis spacecraft computer after astronauts reported it was inexplicably running two instances of Microsoft Outlook. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bsky.app/profile/nikigrayson.com/post/3miik2wzosk25&quot; title=&quot;niki grayson (@nikigrayson.com)    right now the astronauts are calling houston because the computer on the spaceship is running two instances of microsoft outlook and they can&amp;#39;t figure out why. nasa is about to remote into the computer    # JavaScript Required    This is a heavily interactive web application, and JavaScript is required. Simple HTML interfaces are possible, but that is not what this is.    Learn more about Bluesky at [bsky.social](https://bsky.social) and…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The presence of Microsoft Outlook and Windows on the Artemis spacecraft has sparked debate over whether consumer-grade software is appropriate for mission-critical environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616841&quot; title=&quot;Why on God&amp;#39;s green earth is Windows running on the Artemis spaceship?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615838&quot; title=&quot;Is it just me that finds it terrifying that theres any Windows bits on a spaceship?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616197&quot; title=&quot;Bashing on MS products and on ReactJS (apparently used by spacex UIs) is a common pastime here and I&amp;#39;m guilty of it myself. But here we&amp;#39;re talking about actual space rockets flying to space with humans in them. My expectation would be that something like https://tigerstyle.dev/ would be followed or the NASA rules linked from there https://spinroot.com/gerard/pdf/P10.pdf&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find the reliance on Windows &amp;#34;terrifying&amp;#34; compared to the lean efficiency of historical space missions, others argue that Outlook is a practical, low-bandwidth solution for document transfer that avoids the need to retrain astronauts on specialized tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616683&quot; title=&quot;Everyone likes to point and laugh, sure, I&amp;#39;m getting a chuckle as well. However, on more practical level, what are other options? Outlook, the desktop application works really well with local copies, is pretty low bandwidth and very familiar to end users. IMAP with Thunderbird is probably only other option that would satisfy the requirements. EDIT: Yes they need to get email in space. It&amp;#39;s easy way to send documents back and forth.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47620315&quot; title=&quot;Moon landing 1969: 4 KB RAM for the guidance computer is enough. Moon landing 2026: Two instances of MS Outlook sort of started themselves on the guidance computer and we have no idea why.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616984&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Yes they need to get email in space. It&amp;#39;s easy way to send documents back and forth. To me that&amp;#39;s probably much more interesting. We assume they have all this fancy NASA tech, probably some special communication protocols, but nope, email is fine. Still not sure why they&amp;#39;d use Outlook, but I guess it&amp;#39;s easier than retraining astronauts on Alpine or Mutt. How long did the US military rely on mIRC... decades, maybe they still do?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical speculation suggests the dual-instance bug may stem from Microsoft’s current transition between &amp;#34;classic&amp;#34; and web-based versions of the application &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615779&quot; title=&quot;We migrated earlier this year and had a similar problem. Outlook (classic) works differently than the OWA version. They keep the classic version so people don&amp;#39;t spontaneously throw a chair out a window. It&amp;#39;s being phased out slowly.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.6&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Qwen3.6-Plus: Towards real world agents&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (qwen.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615002&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;589 points · 207 comments · by pretext&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alibaba Cloud has launched Qwen3.6-Plus, a hosted model featuring a 1M context window and significant upgrades in agentic coding, multimodal reasoning, and long-horizon planning. Available via API, the model sets new performance standards for repository-level problem solving and autonomous task execution in real-world environments. &lt;a href=&quot;https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.6&quot; title=&quot;Title: Qwen3.6-Plus: Towards Real World Agents    URL Source: https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.6    Published Time: 2026-04-02T04:00:00+08:00    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: Qwen3.6 Main Image](https://qianwen-res.oss-accelerate.aliyuncs.com/Qwen3.6/Figures/3.6_plus_banner.png)  [QWEN CHAT](https://chat.qwen.ai/)[DISCORD](https://discord.gg/yPEP2vHTu4)    Following the release of the Qwen3.5 series in February, we are thrilled to announce the official launch of Qwen3.6-Plus. Available immediately via our…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of Qwen3.6-Plus has sparked significant backlash due to its closed-weight nature, with users accusing Alibaba of using previous open-weight releases as a &amp;#34;bait-and-switch&amp;#34; marketing tactic to pivot toward a proprietary API model &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615397&quot; title=&quot;This is their hosted-only model, not an open weight model like they’ve become known for. They got a lot of good publicity for their open weight model releases, which was the goal. The hard part is pivoting from an open weight provider to being considered as a competitor to Claude and ChatGPT. Initial reactions are mostly anger from everyone who didn’t realize that the play along was to give away the smaller models as advertising, not because they were feeling generous. Comparing to Opus 4.5…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615793&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; not an open weight model like they’ve become known for. Right, they state that they&amp;#39;ll release &amp;#39;smaller&amp;#39; variants openly at some point, with few details as to what that means. Will there be a ~300B variant as with Qwen 3.5? The blog post doesn&amp;#39;t say.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47618080&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not interested in adopting an inferior closed source weight from a geopolitical rival. The open source weights argument was the one thing China had going and that I was seriously cheering them on for. They could have been our saviors and disrupted the US tech giants - and if it was open, I&amp;#39;d have welcomed it. Now they show their true colors. They want to train models on our engineering to replace us, while simultaneously giving nothing back? No thanks. I&amp;#39;d rather fund the shitty US…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics also condemned the use of outdated benchmarks, such as comparing the model to Claude 4.5 instead of 4.6, labeling the move as deceptive and in bad faith &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615397&quot; title=&quot;This is their hosted-only model, not an open weight model like they’ve become known for. They got a lot of good publicity for their open weight model releases, which was the goal. The hard part is pivoting from an open weight provider to being considered as a competitor to Claude and ChatGPT. Initial reactions are mostly anger from everyone who didn’t realize that the play along was to give away the smaller models as advertising, not because they were feeling generous. Comparing to Opus 4.5…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615278&quot; title=&quot;Worth noting that this model, unlike almost all qwen models, is not open-weight, nor is the parameter count exposed. Also odd that it is compared against opus 4.5 even though 4.6 was released like 2 months ago.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616490&quot; title=&quot;I think it’s more the principle of deception that upsets people. Imagine if Apple released a new iPhone and publicly compared its specs to some previous gen Android. It’s not in good faith.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users remain loyal to U.S. providers for geopolitical or privacy reasons &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47618080&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not interested in adopting an inferior closed source weight from a geopolitical rival. The open source weights argument was the one thing China had going and that I was seriously cheering them on for. They could have been our saviors and disrupted the US tech giants - and if it was open, I&amp;#39;d have welcomed it. Now they show their true colors. They want to train models on our engineering to replace us, while simultaneously giving nothing back? No thanks. I&amp;#39;d rather fund the shitty US…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615414&quot; title=&quot;Not really interested in using models hosted on alibaba cloud. Like Qwen local for it’s privacy, but I trust the privacy of Google/OpenAI/Anthropic more than alibaba.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that Chinese competition is a necessary check on U.S. tech dominance and suggest that hosting data with a foreign rival may offer a pragmatic form of privacy from domestic surveillance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47618742&quot; title=&quot;Whereas I as a Canadian am absolutely eager to see a serious competitor from a rival to the US because sending money south to Anthropic and OpenAI who think it&amp;#39;s ok to spy on (or worse) their non-American customers, and are headquartered in a country that is trying to crush my country&amp;#39;s economy, interfere in our domestic politics, and put us out of work and making threats on political allies. I&amp;#39;d prefer them to be open weight, but I&amp;#39;d love to sub a decent competitive coding plan from a European…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615625&quot; title=&quot;I had the exact opposite reaction. I stopped using OpenAI/Google a while ago due to privacy and moved to local Qwen, now I&amp;#39;m considering using Alibaba cloud. You know Google and OpenAI are going to share everything with the US government and Western ad networks. But with Alibaba, who cares if the CCP &amp;amp; Chinese ad networks have a comprehensive profile on me? From a pragmatic perspective it&amp;#39;s much better for (outcomes related to) privacy.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bkhmsi.github.io/i-am-not-a-number/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I Am Not A Number. In memory of the more than 72,000 Palestinians killed&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bkhmsi.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47612053&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;571 points · 132 comments · by bjourne&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This interactive memorial commemorates over 72,000 Palestinians killed in Gaza by representing each individual life as a light that users can hover over to view personal details. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bkhmsi.github.io/i-am-not-a-number/&quot; title=&quot;Title: I Am Not a Number    URL Source: https://bkhmsi.github.io/i-am-not-a-number/    Published Time: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 12:27:41 GMT    Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.    Markdown Content:  # I Am Not a Number    ![Image 1: Handala](https://bkhmsi.github.io/i-am-not-a-number/Handala.png)  # I Am Not a Number    In memory of the 72,000+ Palestinians killed in the Israeli genocide in Gaza.    عربي i    ×    Filter by Age×    0 110+    Showing:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the staggering death toll in Gaza, with users emphasizing that the reported figures are likely a vast undercount and highlighting the extreme number of child casualties &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47612145&quot; title=&quot;Experts agree that this number is a vast, vast undercount.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47612174&quot; title=&quot;That number is absolutely staggering, and the fact that at least 20,000 of these are children is literally making me sick every time I think about it. To Israelis who think this is justified because your country was attacked - for every person killed in the initial attacks, your military has killed 20 children(and many more adults). And that&amp;#39;s the ones that were outright killed, and not &amp;#39;just&amp;#39; had their limbs torn off and given lifelong disabilities. How is that proportionate, fair or in any…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant portion of the debate focuses on the ethics of proportionality in war, with some questioning how such a high ratio of civilian deaths can be justified while others argue that casualty symmetry is not a standard requirement of international law &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47612174&quot; title=&quot;That number is absolutely staggering, and the fact that at least 20,000 of these are children is literally making me sick every time I think about it. To Israelis who think this is justified because your country was attacked - for every person killed in the initial attacks, your military has killed 20 children(and many more adults). And that&amp;#39;s the ones that were outright killed, and not &amp;#39;just&amp;#39; had their limbs torn off and given lifelong disabilities. How is that proportionate, fair or in any…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47612254&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not looking to defend Israel&amp;#39;s actions or to take a political stance here, but just wanted to ask about the proportionality/fairness argument - to the best of my knowledge, a proportionality between casualties on the two sides is not an expectation of any rules of war, and I don&amp;#39;t recall ever seeing it applied to other conflicts.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, many commenters express frustration over the perceived systematic flagging of Gaza-related content on the site, debating whether this reflects a bias against reporting on the conflict or a reaction to the one-sided nature of the stories being shared &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47612306&quot; title=&quot;Why did this get flagged?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47612731&quot; title=&quot;Literally anything related to this conflict gets flagged immediately.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615406&quot; title=&quot;The initial October attacks weren’t flagged. Violence in exactly one direction is flagged.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47617238&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s a single story from a few years ago. There&amp;#39;s been plenty of violence against Israelis since; we very rarely see those stories here. Why should we have daily discussions about one-sided anti-Israel stories, and almost none of the opposite? Not to mention very little about other conflict around the world.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47612266&quot; title=&quot;It really is an indictment of this site that any mention of the genocide in Gaza is flagged almost instantly.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lemonade-server.ai&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Lemonade by AMD: a fast and open source local LLM server using GPU and NPU&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lemonade-server.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47612724&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;569 points · 113 comments · by AbuAssar&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lemonade is a fast, open-source local AI server optimized for GPUs and NPUs that supports text, image, and speech generation through an OpenAI-compatible API. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lemonade-server.ai&quot; title=&quot;Title: Local AI for Text, Images, and Speech    URL Source: https://lemonade-server.ai/    Markdown Content:  ## Refreshingly fast     on GPUs and NPUs    Open source. Private. Ready in minutes on any PC.    Chat    What can I do with 128 GB of unified RAM?    Load up models like gpt-oss-120b or Qwen-Coder-Next for advanced tool use.    What should I tune first?    You can use --no-mmap to speed up load times and increase context size to 64 or more.    Image Generation    A pitcher of lemonade in the style of a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users highlight Lemonade as a versatile, pragmatic tool for AMD hardware that supports ROCm, Vulkan, and NPUs while maintaining compatibility with OpenAI and Ollama endpoints &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47613997&quot; title=&quot;I have been using lemonade for nearly a year already. On Strix Halo I am using nothing else - although kyuz0&amp;#39;s toolboxes are also nice ( https://kyuz0.github.io/amd-strix-halo-toolboxes/ ) Nowadays you get TTS, STT, text &amp;amp; image generation and image editing should also be possible. Besides being able to run via rocm, vulkan or on CPU, GPU and NPU. Quite a lot of options. They have a quite good and pragmatic pace in development. Really recommend this for AMD hardware! Edit: OpenAI and i think…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some praise AMD for its open drivers and cost-efficiency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47617554&quot; title=&quot;I exclusively buy AMD hardware for local inference. For open drivers, power efficiency, and cost AMD beats Nvidia easily for consumers.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others note that ROCm can be difficult to manage and question the utility of NPUs, which are often seen as low-power bottlenecks suitable only for small models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615527&quot; title=&quot;Been running local LLMs on my 7900 XTX for months and the ROCm experience has been... rough. The fact that AMD is backing an official inference server that handles the driver/dependency maze is huge. My biggest question is NPU support - has anyone actually gotten meaningful throughput from the Ryzen AI NPU vs just using the dGPU? In my testing the NPU was mostly a bottleneck for anything beyond tiny models.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47613943&quot; title=&quot;Just in case anyone isn&amp;#39;t aware. NPUs are low power, slow, and meant for small models.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616723&quot; title=&quot;I wonder what was the imagined use case? TBH I was seriously thinking about buying a framework desktop but the NPU put me off.. I don&amp;#39;t get why I should have to pay money for a bunch of silicon that doesn&amp;#39;t do anything. And now that there&amp;#39;s some software support... it still doesn&amp;#39;t do anything? Why does it even exist at all then?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Experienced users report success running large models like Qwen 32B and GPT 120B on high-end AMD hardware, though they emphasize the importance of proper context size configuration for agentic tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47613997&quot; title=&quot;I have been using lemonade for nearly a year already. On Strix Halo I am using nothing else - although kyuz0&amp;#39;s toolboxes are also nice ( https://kyuz0.github.io/amd-strix-halo-toolboxes/ ) Nowadays you get TTS, STT, text &amp;amp; image generation and image editing should also be possible. Besides being able to run via rocm, vulkan or on CPU, GPU and NPU. Quite a lot of options. They have a quite good and pragmatic pace in development. Really recommend this for AMD hardware! Edit: OpenAI and i think…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615401&quot; title=&quot;I have two Strix Halo devices at hand. Privately a framework desktop with 128gb and at work 64GB HP notebook. The 64GB machine can load Qwen3.5 30B-A3B, with VSCode it needs a bit of initial prompt processing to initialize all those tools I guess. But the model is fighting with the other resources that I need. So I am not really using it anymore these days, but I want to experiment on my home machine with it. I just dont work on it much right now. Lemonade has a Web UI to set the context size…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.danieldavies.com/2004/05/d-squared-digest-one-minute-mba.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Good ideas do not need lots of lies in order to gain public acceptance (2008)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.danieldavies.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47617415&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;364 points · 203 comments · by sedev&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Daniel Davies argues that truly good ideas do not require deception to gain public support, applying business school principles to critique the dishonest justifications and lack of accountability surrounding the Iraq War and corporate accounting practices. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.danieldavies.com/2004/05/d-squared-digest-one-minute-mba.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: D-squared Digest -- FOR bigger pies and shorter hours and AGAINST more or less everything else    URL Source: https://blog.danieldavies.com/2004/05/d-squared-digest-one-minute-mba.html    Published Time: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 09:39:32 GMT    Markdown Content:  # D-squared Digest -- FOR bigger pies and shorter hours and AGAINST more or less everything else    # Economics and similar, for the sleep-deprived A subtle change has been made to the comments links, so they no longer pop up. Does this in any…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some argue that &amp;#34;good ideas&amp;#34; should eventually succeed on their own merits, others contend that &amp;#34;lies&amp;#34; or hype are often necessary to disturb the status quo and spur initial action for innovative concepts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47619594&quot; title=&quot;Interesting that this quote was initially about stock options at tech companies.  It turned out that stock options did become nearly universal in tech compensation, and companies that granted them outcompeted companies that did not.  So the management that was ostensibly “doing a massive blag at the expense of shareholders” wasn’t really, time vindicated their practices and things like option backdating and not treating them as an expense weren’t even really necessary, but it took a few years. …&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. This tension is visible in the debate over electric vehicles: while early adopters praise their luxury and low fuel costs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47624316&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not sure. Don&amp;#39;t underestimate the power of inertia. I bought an EV last year and it&amp;#39;s definitely been a &amp;#39;good idea&amp;#39; for me. Luxurious ride, fuel costs a tenth, doesn&amp;#39;t stink. Seems such an obvious upgrade it slightly confuses me take-up hasn&amp;#39;t been quicker among people who like me can charge at home.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that for many, the high purchase price, insurance premiums, and lack of home charging infrastructure make them a mathematically poor choice compared to maintaining older vehicles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47624432&quot; title=&quot;I looked into buying an EV but it turns out it would be a little over four times as expensive as running an old Landrover with a massive V8 engine. So I still run an old Landrover with a massive V8 engine.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47625341&quot; title=&quot;Okay, it immediately costs more to buy an EV than it does to run my existing car. The monthly payment to buy an EV is more than I spend on fuel. Then I&amp;#39;d be paying roughly ten times as much for insurance, because it&amp;#39;s a new and valuable car, and being &amp;#39;keyless&amp;#39; it cannot be secured in any meaningful way without locking it in a garage, which I don&amp;#39;t have. Because I don&amp;#39;t have a garage or a driveway I can&amp;#39;t park right at my house, so I would not be able to charge at home. So I&amp;#39;d have to park an…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47624361&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; it slightly confuses me take-up hasn&amp;#39;t been quicker among people who like me can charge at home No big mystery: a) most people keep cars for 20 years or more, b) most people don&amp;#39;t buy new cars - they&amp;#39;re too expensive.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Similarly, the evolution of tech compensation shows that while stock options were once hyped as a revolutionary tool, they were eventually tempered by the reality of &amp;#34;underwater&amp;#34; options and replaced by more controlled RSUs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47619594&quot; title=&quot;Interesting that this quote was initially about stock options at tech companies.  It turned out that stock options did become nearly universal in tech compensation, and companies that granted them outcompeted companies that did not.  So the management that was ostensibly “doing a massive blag at the expense of shareholders” wasn’t really, time vindicated their practices and things like option backdating and not treating them as an expense weren’t even really necessary, but it took a few years. …&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47620375&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; stock options did become nearly universal in tech compensation Although I&amp;#39;ve noticed that options have been replaced more and more these days with RSU&amp;#39;s (plain old grants) because options have a tendency to go &amp;#39;underwater&amp;#39;, suggesting that they weren&amp;#39;t all that great to begin with.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47621146&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; options have been replaced more and more these days with RSU&amp;#39;s (plain old grants) RSUs are also much-less liquid and tightly controllable by companies than actual stock. That has made them attractive to management and insiders.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Concerns also persist that hype in fields like AI may mask significant dangers, such as the erosion of civil rights through surveillance and data&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mintlify.com/blog/how-we-built-a-virtual-filesystem-for-our-assistant&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;We replaced RAG with a virtual filesystem for our AI documentation assistant&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mintlify.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47618223&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;403 points · 148 comments · by denssumesh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mintlify replaced traditional RAG with ChromaFs, a virtual filesystem that translates UNIX commands into database queries to allow AI agents to navigate documentation more efficiently with near-instant latency and significantly lower infrastructure costs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mintlify.com/blog/how-we-built-a-virtual-filesystem-for-our-assistant&quot; title=&quot;Title: How we built a virtual filesystem for our Assistant    URL Source: https://www.mintlify.com/blog/how-we-built-a-virtual-filesystem-for-our-assistant    Published Time: 2026-03-24T00:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  RAG is great, until it isn&amp;#39;t.    Our assistant could only retrieve chunks of text that matched a query. If the answer lived across multiple pages, or the user needed exact syntax that didn&amp;#39;t land in a top-K result, it was stuck. We wanted it to explore docs the way you&amp;#39;d explore a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current industry reliance on vector-based RAG is viewed by some as a &amp;#34;historical accident&amp;#34; that overlooks traditional, more interpretable search methods like keyword indexing and hierarchical organization &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47629821&quot; title=&quot;Someone simply assumed at some point that RAG must be based on vector search, and everyone followed.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47629957&quot; title=&quot;It’s something of a historical accident We started with LLMs when everyone in search was building question answering systems. Those architectures look like the vector DB + chunking we associate with RAG. Agents ability to call tools, using any retrieval backend, call that into question. We really shouldn’t start RAG with the assumption we need that. I’ll be speaking about the subject in a few weeks https://maven.com/p/7105dc/rag-is-the-what-agentic-search-is...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents of a filesystem approach argue that directory structures act as human-curated knowledge graphs that agents can navigate more effectively than abstract vector embeddings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47629661&quot; title=&quot;The real thing I think people are rediscovering with file system based search is that there’s a type of semantic search that’s not embedding based retrieval. One that looks more like how a librarian organizes files into shelves based on the domain. We’re rediscovering forms of in search we’ve known about for decades. And it turns out they’re more interpretable to agents. https://softwaredoug.com/blog/2026/01/08/semantic-search-wit...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47633136&quot; title=&quot;Agreed. I&amp;#39;ve been working on a codebase with 400+ Python files and the difference is stark. With embedding-based RAG, the agent kept pulling irrelevant code snippets that happened to share vocabulary. Switched to just letting the agent browse the directory tree and read files on demand -- it figured out the module structure in about 30 seconds and started asking for the right files by path. The directory hierarchy is already a human-curated knowledge graph. We just forgot that because we got…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics contend that this is a regression to 1960s-era technology, noting that modern databases can already index data hierarchically or via tags without the limitations of a &amp;#34;fake shell&amp;#34; or raw grep &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47631942&quot; title=&quot;This is one of the most confusing claims I&amp;#39;ve seen in a long time. Grep and others over files would be the equivalent of an old fashioned keyword search where most RAG uses vector search. But everything else they claim about a file system just suggests that they don&amp;#39;t know anything about databases. I&amp;#39;m not familiar with how most out of the box RAG systems categorize data, but with a database you can index content literally in any way you want. You could do it like a filesystem with hierarchy,…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632066&quot; title=&quot;Sorry, this still makes no sense. LLMs don&amp;#39;t care about files. The way most codings systems work is that they simply provide the whole file to the LLM rather than a subset of it. That&amp;#39;s just a choice in how you implemented your RAG search system and database. In this case the &amp;#39;record&amp;#39; is big, a file. No doubt that works for code, but it&amp;#39;s nonsensical outside that. E.g. for wikipedia the logical unit would likely be an article. For a book, maybe it&amp;#39;s a chapter, or maybe it&amp;#39;s a paragraph. You…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these theoretical disagreements, developers report empirical success using file-based browsing for coding tasks, as agents often struggle with complex custom tools but excel at reading full files in context &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632012&quot; title=&quot;I get what you’re saying, and you’re right, however I can also see where they’re coming from: Empirically, agents (especially the coding CLIs) seem to be doing so much better with files, even if the tooling around them is less than ideal. With other custom tools they instantly lose 50 IQ points, if they even bother using the tools in the first place.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47630159&quot; title=&quot;100% agree a FUSE mount would be the way to go given more time and resources. Putting Chroma behind a FUSE adapter was my initial thought when I was implementing this but it was way too slow. I think we would also need to optimize grep even if we had a FUSE mount. This was easier in our case, because we didn’t need a 100% POSIX compatibility for our read only docs use case because the agent used only a subset of bash commands anyway to traverse the docs. This also avoids any extra infra…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tomshardware.com/networking/artemis-ii-will-use-laser-beams-to-live-stream-4k-moon-footage-one-giant-step-beyond-the-s-band-radio-comms-of-the-apollo-era&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Artemis II will use laser beams to live-stream 4K moon footage at 260 Mbps&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tomshardware.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615449&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;373 points · 151 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NASA&amp;#39;s Artemis II mission will utilize the laser-based O2O communications system to live-stream 4K footage from the moon at speeds up to 260 Mbps. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tomshardware.com/networking/artemis-ii-will-use-laser-beams-to-live-stream-4k-moon-footage-one-giant-step-beyond-the-s-band-radio-comms-of-the-apollo-era&quot; title=&quot;Artemis II will use laser beams to live-stream 4K moon footage at 260 Mbps — one giant step beyond the S-band radio comms of the Apollo era    NASA&amp;#39;s O2O system can handle 260 Mbps transfers and will give us the first glimpses of the far side of the moon.    [Skip to main content](#main)    Open menu    [![Tom&amp;#39;s Hardware](/media/img/brand_logo.svg)  Tom&amp;#39;s Hardware](https://www.tomshardware.com)    US Edition  ![flag of…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters expressed significant frustration with NASA&amp;#39;s recent launch coverage, criticizing the production for missing key moments like booster separation and failing to track the rocket&amp;#39;s ascent &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615903&quot; title=&quot;Hopefully, the footage is better than the missed pan up at lift-off, and showing spectators at the time of booster separation. I understand funding cuts and all, but this is a once-in-a-generation moment and it’s filmed with no apparent effort whatsoever.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616915&quot; title=&quot;They missed it pulling off the pad, they then had a picture of the plume, the wide shot off the pad was quite a bit too late also, then they missed the separation of the boosters and the upper stage separation. Honestly it looks like they intentionally missed every high risk procedure intentionally and cut back a few seconds after it had succeeded.You don&amp;#39;t make this many mistakes one after the other accidentally, its easier to do this right than wrong, cutting to the crowd as booster…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616108&quot; title=&quot;Crazy that a dude from Iowa and his ragtag group of rocket watchers does a better job with launch coverage than NASA.  I can&amp;#39;t believe they cut away during booster separation.  Absolute shit show.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some attribute these shortcomings to budget cuts or a lack of specialized marketing personnel compared to SpaceX &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616323&quot; title=&quot;A reminder that the illegal DOGE took a chainsaw to NASA personnel last year. If you&amp;#39;re disappointed that the feed update wasn&amp;#39;t as polished as a SpaceX launch it&amp;#39;s because the later has an actual communications and marketing department with a budget.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616382&quot; title=&quot;I suspect this is a frequency thing. Early SpaceX broadcasts were pretty rough. NASA just doesn&amp;#39;t do launch coverage with the same sort of cadence. Honestly, they should consider outsourcing that bit.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others suspect NASA intentionally cut away during high-risk procedures to avoid broadcasting potential failures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616915&quot; title=&quot;They missed it pulling off the pad, they then had a picture of the plume, the wide shot off the pad was quite a bit too late also, then they missed the separation of the boosters and the upper stage separation. Honestly it looks like they intentionally missed every high risk procedure intentionally and cut back a few seconds after it had succeeded.You don&amp;#39;t make this many mistakes one after the other accidentally, its easier to do this right than wrong, cutting to the crowd as booster…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the high mission cost, many felt the &amp;#34;substance over form&amp;#34; aesthetic was undermined by overly scripted, cinematic dialogue and technical execution that lagged behind amateur rocket watchers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616117&quot; title=&quot;The camera and simulation footage were a bit of a letdown and something SpaceX does much better. On the other hand NASA launches do evoke a feeling of substance over form where science takes precedence over presentation. For that money however I concur - I expected more. Especially the simulation footage where the lack of brightness made it hard to see the vehicle - they might as well have used KSP for it&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616108&quot; title=&quot;Crazy that a dude from Iowa and his ragtag group of rocket watchers does a better job with launch coverage than NASA.  I can&amp;#39;t believe they cut away during booster separation.  Absolute shit show.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616446&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; NASA launches do evoke a feeling of substance over form For real? I was rolling my eyes hard at: GC systems go?        GC systems go for all for humanity! And then the VERY scripted pre-launch speeches. It’s like everyone there had been taking notes from inspirational hero movies. It’s cool. But let’s not act like going around the moon is the most historic thing ever… since we’ve already done it plenty, right?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616847&quot; title=&quot;Artemis has a budget of over 90 billion dollars, it&amp;#39;s more than 4 billion for that Artemis II launch (as estimated by NASA, possibly more because they don&amp;#39;t even know exactly how much they&amp;#39;re spending). For that price one might reasonably expect a couple of quality cameras for the public to be able to view what their money was spent on. For comparison, a SpaceX ISS resupply mission costs NASA ~$150 million. While that&amp;#39;s a very different rocket and mission, that still doesn&amp;#39;t account for a 26x…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/01/the-reputation-of-troubled-yc-startup-delve-has-gotten-even-worse/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Delve allegedly forked an open-source tool and sold it as its own&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techcrunch.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615434&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;326 points · 175 comments · by nickvec&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Compliance startup Delve faces allegations that it violated open-source licenses by rebranding and selling a tool from its own customer, Sim.ai, as its own proprietary software. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/01/the-reputation-of-troubled-yc-startup-delve-has-gotten-even-worse/&quot; title=&quot;The reputation of troubled YC startup Delve has gotten even worse | TechCrunch    Delve faces new allegations that it violated the open source license of its customer, Sim.ai, by taking the customers&amp;#39;s tool and passing it off as its own.    –:–:–:–    The first StrictlyVC of 2026 lands in San Francisco on April 30. Tickets are limited. [Register…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the Apache license legally permits forking and selling software, commenters argue the core issue is Delve&amp;#39;s alleged dishonesty regarding the tool&amp;#39;s origins and their failure to provide required attribution &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615972&quot; title=&quot;The project is Apache licensed, so even if they took it, outside of lacking attribution / retaining copyright, I don&amp;#39;t see a problem? They would be require to add it to an &amp;#39;About&amp;#39; tab or something. The project in question is here: https://github.com/simstudioai/sim&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616019&quot; title=&quot;I think the problem is more that they weren&amp;#39;t honest about the origins, even if we disregard the point where they themselves break the license terms. &amp;gt; DeepDelver recognized that Pathways looked a lot like Sim.ai’s open source agent-building product called SimStudio and asked Delve if it was based on SimStudio. The Delve folks said they built it themselves, the whistleblower contends. If they were upfront about that it was a fork, and attributed it, sounds like there wouldn&amp;#39;t have been any…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47617535&quot; title=&quot;What probably happened here is depressingly common in early-stage startups. Someone finds an open source tool that does 80% of what they need, forks it, strips the branding, and then ships it. Nobody thinks about the license because the company is in &amp;#39;move fast&amp;#39; mode and there&amp;#39;s no process for it yet. Sure, the Apache 2.0 allows this, but the mistake is that when someone asked &amp;#39;is this based on SimStudio?&amp;#39; the answer was &amp;#39;we built it ourselves&amp;#39; instead of &amp;#39;yes, it&amp;#39;s a fork, here&amp;#39;s what we…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. This behavior is viewed by some as a moral failure rather than a legal one, likely stemming from a &amp;#34;move fast&amp;#34; startup culture that prioritized speed over licensing compliance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616021&quot; title=&quot;Sometimes people consider morality instead of legality.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47617535&quot; title=&quot;What probably happened here is depressingly common in early-stage startups. Someone finds an open source tool that does 80% of what they need, forks it, strips the branding, and then ships it. Nobody thinks about the license because the company is in &amp;#39;move fast&amp;#39; mode and there&amp;#39;s no process for it yet. Sure, the Apache 2.0 allows this, but the mistake is that when someone asked &amp;#39;is this based on SimStudio?&amp;#39; the answer was &amp;#39;we built it ourselves&amp;#39; instead of &amp;#39;yes, it&amp;#39;s a fork, here&amp;#39;s what we…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also includes a significant tangent regarding the ethics of sharing a specific meme linked to the developer of TempleOS, debating whether the creator&amp;#39;s mental health excuses the use of offensive language &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616053&quot; title=&quot;This hilarious meme continues to prove itself correct again and again https://lukesmith.xyz/articles/why-i-use-the-gpl-and-not-cuc...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616606&quot; title=&quot;Does that blog post have a glowing smiley face with &amp;#39;A BUNCH OF N***ERS&amp;#39; written in on it in pixelated text? Would think twice about linking that one in polite company.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616703&quot; title=&quot;Not defending it, but the meme itself is derivative quote from the developer of TempleOS. He suffered from Schizophrenia and believed the CIA was tracking him. He believed you could tell a CIA agent due to them glowing, and would refer to them as &amp;#39;glowy nwords&amp;#39; very regularly. The term &amp;#39;glowy&amp;#39; has taken on a life of its own despite the original context. The image itself is from it&amp;#39;s 4chan days. Probably poor taste to include a version with Terry&amp;#39;s full quote.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47617110&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m sympathetic to Terry saying that. The guy had measurable brain damage, and it&amp;#39;s hard to blame someone for doing things when it&amp;#39;s their damaged brain that decides to do them. It&amp;#39;s like getting mad at a diabetic for having high blood sugar. But I can certainly squint at other people when they spread Terry&amp;#39;s quotes and memes.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47617715&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; But I can certainly squint at other people when they spread Terry&amp;#39;s quotes and memes Someone can use language you disagree with but still have a point if you dig past it. I also happen to personally think it&amp;#39;s important to engage with this sort of thinker at least sometimes Insisting on polite, formal language can be a type of bigotry too you know. It&amp;#39;s historically pretty classist, and lately also indicates a sort of neuronormative bigotry. Idk, some food for thought&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/artemis-iis-toilet-is-a-moon-mission-milestone/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Artemis II&amp;#39;s toilet is a moon mission milestone&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (scientificamerican.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47609356&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;325 points · 173 comments · by 1659447091&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NASA’s Artemis II mission will feature the first functional toilet on a lunar voyage, replacing the messy bag systems of the Apollo era with a titanium unit that offers a door for privacy and the ability to process urine and feces simultaneously. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/artemis-iis-toilet-is-a-moon-mission-milestone/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Artemis II’s toilet is a moon mission milestone    URL Source: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/artemis-iis-toilet-is-a-moon-mission-milestone/    Published Time: 2026-04-01T08:00:00-04:00    Markdown Content:  On their voyages to the moon, NASA’s astronauts are finally getting some creature comforts of terrestrial toilets—such as having a door and being able to pee and poop simultaneously    By [K. R. Callaway](https://www.scientificamerican.com/author/k-r-callaway/)edited by [Lee…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Apollo-era waste management systems were notoriously difficult and &amp;#34;distasteful,&amp;#34; often requiring up to 45 minutes for a single fecal collection process that involved manual manipulation and kneading of germicide bags &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47620653&quot; title=&quot;More on what astronauts found “objectionable” and “distasteful” with Apollo&amp;#39;s system, from the PDF linked in the OP (1): &amp;#39;In general, the Apollo waste management system worked satisfactorily from an engineering standpoint. From the point of view of crew acceptance, however, the system must be given poor marks. The principal problem with both the urine and fecal collection systems was the fact that these required more manipulation than crewmen were used to in the Earth environment and were, as a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47621913&quot; title=&quot;Warning: gross Of course, but the fundamental problem is that difficulties compound. It starts with: pooping is much harder when gravity isn&amp;#39;t there to persistently tug on the turd. Something that is slightly obnoxious on Earth (using a bag, using a suit flap) turns into an absolute trainwreck when you have a bag, a suit flap, and turd separation failure. Now you have to do precise mechanical manipulation of an object you don&amp;#39;t want to touch behind your back through a bag and a suit flap, every…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While commenters questioned why these issues weren&amp;#39;t resolved through pre-mission simulations, others noted that the absence of gravity creates unique &amp;#34;turd separation&amp;#34; and aerosolization failures that are nearly impossible to replicate or appreciate on Earth &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47621681&quot; title=&quot;Did they not have the astronauts simulate the mission beforehand, on Earth? Wear the clothing, eat the meals, use the toilet, etc? It sounds like that would have allowed them to fix the suit before they went? They must have eaten the meals and such to be sure they could function, make sure they didn&amp;#39;t have any intolerance, for example?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47621913&quot; title=&quot;Warning: gross Of course, but the fundamental problem is that difficulties compound. It starts with: pooping is much harder when gravity isn&amp;#39;t there to persistently tug on the turd. Something that is slightly obnoxious on Earth (using a bag, using a suit flap) turns into an absolute trainwreck when you have a bag, a suit flap, and turd separation failure. Now you have to do precise mechanical manipulation of an object you don&amp;#39;t want to touch behind your back through a bag and a suit flap, every…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Similar physiological challenges persist for fighter pilots, where the complexity of &amp;#34;piddle packs&amp;#34; has been linked to crashes and &amp;#34;number 2&amp;#34; emergencies often result in permanent call signs for those who soil their cockpits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47623064&quot; title=&quot;I mean this has also been a problem for fighter pilots as well. The &amp;#39;piddle packs&amp;#39; for F-16 pilots are implicared at least one crash due to the complexity of using them. [1] https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1991-03-23-me-542-st...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47627812&quot; title=&quot;Forget about pee, I always wondered about fighter pilots in one of those long, multi-hour flights, what happens if they really need to go number 2? I suppose they self-select as people without this kind of problems, but it can happen to anyone really. I suppose in an emergency they just shit their pants, but I wonder what the ground crew says when they touch down.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628278&quot; title=&quot;Honestly this isn&amp;#39;t something people select for at all--by the time you&amp;#39;ve made it through that many rounds of selection you aren&amp;#39;t going to let GI issues keep you from the finish. I&amp;#39;ve heard of some creative solutions to the problem involving safing the ejection seat and getting out of your gear, but I don&amp;#39;t really believe any of them. If you think it&amp;#39;s a significant risk, you basically have two options: talk to the squadron flight surgeon and get medically grounded, or wear a diaper. Almost…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Artemis II continues this legacy of technical difficulty, as astronauts recently had to consult with a &amp;#34;Toilet Lead&amp;#34; to troubleshoot &amp;#34;fluid disposal&amp;#34; issues during live operations [6&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://spencermortensen.com/articles/email-obfuscation/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Email obfuscation: What works in 2026?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (spencermortensen.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47609694&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;369 points · 104 comments · by jaden&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This 2026 analysis of email obfuscation techniques reveals that while basic HTML entities and comments stop most spammers, advanced methods like CSS &amp;#34;display: none,&amp;#34; JavaScript AES encryption, and user-interaction triggers achieve 100% effectiveness without compromising accessibility. &lt;a href=&quot;https://spencermortensen.com/articles/email-obfuscation/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Email address obfuscation: What works in 2026?    URL Source: https://spencermortensen.com/articles/email-obfuscation/    Markdown Content:  # Email address obfuscation: What works in 2026?  [Articles](https://spencermortensen.com/articles/)  # Email address obfuscation: What works in 2026?    Last updated:April 2, 2026  Here are some of the best techniques for keeping email addresses hidden from spammers—along with the statistics on how likely they are to be broken.    *   1 [Plain…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users employ elaborate obfuscation techniques like Brainfuck interpreters &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47611867&quot; title=&quot;When I wrote my own brainf*ck interpreter (in C) at the start of the year I was really struggling to find a use for the language. Eventually I had the idea to obfuscate emails on my websites with the language. Basically each email gets written as a brainf*ck program and stored in a &amp;#39;data-&amp;#39; attribute. The html only includes a more primitively obfuscated statement &amp;#39;Must enable Javascript to see e-mail.&amp;#39; by default which then gets replaced by another brainf*ck interpreter (in JS) with the output…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt; or CSS-hidden &amp;#34;tarpit&amp;#34; addresses to trap scrapers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47612008&quot; title=&quot;One trick is having an tarpit email adress on your website. It is hidden using CSS so no real visitor sees it but it is visible in source. If your mail server recieves mail for that adress you can just block that IP for 24h.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, many argue these efforts are futile because most spam originates from massive data breaches rather than website harvesting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47610524&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m sorry, but that is not how email address are spammed in bulk. The data-source are the enormous data breach that are more and more frequent.  There is more intensive to collect more information on someone you already know something about than spamming an email you don&amp;#39;t even know if it&amp;#39;s a valid one. The spam can also be very more effective as it present itself with personal information about the spammed.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47611335&quot; title=&quot;This is such a waste of effort. Your E-mail address is not and can&amp;#39;t be a secret. It will get into spammer databases eventually, no matter what you do. You will spend a lot of effort doing all these fancy tricks, and eventually you will get spam anyway. Also, a note to those who make fancy &amp;#39;me+someservice@somedomain.com&amp;#39; addresses: make really sure you are in control and these work. Some services (including mine) will need to E-mail you one day, for example to tell you that your account will be…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a growing consensus that modern spam filters are sufficiently effective, with some users even leveraging local LLMs to achieve near-perfect filtering accuracy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47611294&quot; title=&quot;I stopped being concerned about email harvesting years ago, I just simply leave the email on my website. Spam handling is okay enough, I guess. But I like this review of techniques, even the simplest ones are very effective, that surprised me.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47611335&quot; title=&quot;This is such a waste of effort. Your E-mail address is not and can&amp;#39;t be a secret. It will get into spammer databases eventually, no matter what you do. You will spend a lot of effort doing all these fancy tricks, and eventually you will get spam anyway. Also, a note to those who make fancy &amp;#39;me+someservice@somedomain.com&amp;#39; addresses: make really sure you are in control and these work. Some services (including mine) will need to E-mail you one day, for example to tell you that your account will be…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. However, concerns remain that LLMs will also empower spammers to bypass traditional filters &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47612549&quot; title=&quot;I agree that email addresses get leaked eventually. However, LLMs are quite good at generating spam and I think soon will evade most filters.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, leading some to prefer simple human-readable instructions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47611306&quot; title=&quot;https://www.gregegan.net/ Contact details: [any mailbox] [at] [the domain name of this web site]. Please don’t ask me to give interviews, sign books, appear on podcasts, attend conferences or conventions, or provide feedback or endorsements for works of fiction, scientific theories, or slabs of text disgorged by chatbots. I have no idea how to decipher this obfuscation.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt; or unique per-service email addresses to manage incoming mail &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47616033&quot; title=&quot;Really surprised this [very well-written] article didn&amp;#39;t suggest the fantastic technique of owning an entire domain (although author&amp;#39;s own examples obviously include unique handles@ for each tested practice). Then you can hand each recipient an absolutely unique email which isn&amp;#39;t just ole &amp;#39;name.morewords@&amp;#39; period trick — block those which receive SPAM. ---- OR: the even &amp;#39;easier&amp;#39; lifestyle of just not using email (like me). Obviously this is difficult for modern living, but that&amp;#39;s what temp…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lwn.net/Articles/1065620/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Significant raise of reports&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lwn.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47611921&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;313 points · 155 comments · by stratos123&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The requested news story is currently inaccessible due to a 503 Service Unavailable error on the LWN.net server. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lwn.net/Articles/1065620/&quot; title=&quot;Title: 503 Service Unavailable    URL Source: https://lwn.net/Articles/1065620/    Warning: Target URL returned error 503: Service Unavailable  Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.    Markdown Content:  # 503 Service Unavailable    # Service Unavailable    The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The recent surge in bug reports, driven by automated tools and AI, has sparked debate over whether modern software quality has declined compared to the pre-internet era when physical distribution necessitated rigorous testing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47612669&quot; title=&quot;The last paragraph is interesting: &amp;#39;Overall I think we&amp;#39;re going to see a much higher quality of software, ironically around the same level than before 2000 when the net became usable by everyone to download fixes. When the software had to be pressed to CDs or written to millions of floppies, it had to survive an amazing quantity of tests that are mostly neglected nowadays since updates are easy to distribute.&amp;#39; Was software made before 2000 better? And, if so, was it because of better testing or…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47612913&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Was software made before 2000 better? At the time of release, yes. They had to ensure the software worked before printing CDs and floppies. Nowadays they release buggy versions that users essentially test for them.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that older software was more stable due to these constraints, others point out that it was plagued by frequent crashes, lack of autosave, and catastrophic security vulnerabilities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47614259&quot; title=&quot;There are some rose-colored glasses when people say this. Programs didn’t auto save and regularly crashed. It was extremely common to hear someone talk about losing hours of work. Computers regularly blue screened at random. Device drivers weren’t isolated from the kernel so you could easily buy a dongle or something that single-handedly destabilized your system. Viruses regularly brought the white-collar economy to its knees. Computer games that were just starting to come online and be…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant disagreement regarding the Linux kernel&amp;#39;s philosophy of treating all bugs equally; critics argue that users need to prioritize security fixes over general updates to avoid breaking stable systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615578&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; people will finally understand that security bugs are bugs, and that the only sane way to stay safe is to periodically update, without focusing on &amp;#39;CVE-xxx&amp;#39; Linux devs keep making that point, but I really don&amp;#39;t understand why they expect the world to embrace that thinking. You don&amp;#39;t need to care about the vast majority of software defects in Linux, save for the once-in-a-decade filesystem corruption bug. In fact, there is an incentive not to upgrade when things are working, because it takes…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615906&quot; title=&quot;Yeah that attitude really makes no sense, and I don&amp;#39;t see why AI finding security bugs would make people &amp;#39;finally understand&amp;#39;. I suspect it&amp;#39;s just an excuse for Linux&amp;#39;s generally poor security track record.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615804&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;software that used to follow the &amp;#39;release-then-go-back-to-cave&amp;#39; model will have to change to start dealing with maintenance for real, or to just stop being proposed to the world as the ultimate-tool-for-this-and-that because every piece of software becomes a target. Actually, some software are running the water-heater/heat-pump system in my basement. There is a small blue light screen, it keeps logs of consumed electricity/produced heat and can make small histograms. Of course there is a smart…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bytemash.net/posts/subscription-bombing-your-signup-form-is-a-weapon/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Subscription bombing and how to mitigate it&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bytemash.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47609882&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;285 points · 177 comments · by homelessdino&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bytemash details how attackers use automated bots to &amp;#34;subscription bomb&amp;#34; victims by flooding their inboxes with sign-up emails to mask fraudulent activity. To mitigate this, the company implemented Cloudflare Turnstile and restricted all automated emails until a user&amp;#39;s address is verified. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bytemash.net/posts/subscription-bombing-your-signup-form-is-a-weapon/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Your sign-up form is a weapon | Bytemash    URL Source: https://bytemash.net/posts/subscription-bombing-your-signup-form-is-a-weapon/    Published Time: 2026-03-25T10:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  # Your sign-up form is a weapon | Bytemash  [Skip to content](https://bytemash.net/posts/subscription-bombing-your-signup-form-is-a-weapon/#main-content)    [Bytemash](https://bytemash.net/)  *   [Posts](https://bytemash.net/posts)  *   [Tags](https://bytemash.net/tags)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide between those who view centralized gatekeepers like Cloudflare as essential for mitigating sophisticated attacks and those who argue such tools erode the internet&amp;#39;s decentralized nature &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47610203&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a problem, but I really dislike the solution. Putting a website with known security issues behind Cloudflare&amp;#39;s Turnstile is comparable to enforcing code signing—works until it doesn&amp;#39;t, and in the meantime, helps centralize power around a single legal entitiy while pissing legitimate users off. The Internet was carefully designed to withstand a nuclear war and this approach, being adopted en masse, is slowly turning it into a shadow of its former self. And despite the us-east1 and multiple…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47610285&quot; title=&quot;So your solution would be to do nothing? Cloudflare is an excellent solution for many things. The internet was designed to withstand a nuclear war, but it also wasn’t designed for the level of hostility that goes on on the internet these days.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47611134&quot; title=&quot;Cloudflare is not the solution&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users advocate for traditional methods like email verification or honeypots to prevent &amp;#34;subscription bombing&amp;#34; and credit card &amp;#34;cleaning&amp;#34; attacks, others note that these can be bypassed by disposable emails or bot automation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47610397&quot; title=&quot;Recently we suffered a different kind of subscription bombing: a hacker using our &amp;#39;change credit card&amp;#39; form to &amp;#39;clean&amp;#39; a list of thousands credit cards to see which ones would go through and approve transactions. He ran the attack from midnight to 7AM, so there were no humans watching. IPs were rotated on every single request, so no rate limiter caught it. We had Cloudflare Turnstile installed in both the sign up form and in all credit card forms. All requests were validated by Turnstile. We…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47610828&quot; title=&quot;One thing I have never understood in this current age is how in the world so many companies, including ones that handle confidential data like banks, don’t require a user to verify their email address after it’s entered. I have an unfortunately very generic email address that’s easy to mistype, and I am almost every day receiving order receipts for expensive vacation hotels, bank transfer or wire transfer confirmations, a very long list of things that I should not be receiving simply because…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47610226&quot; title=&quot;A good old Honey Pot helped us at All Quiet &amp;#39;a lot&amp;#39; with those attacks. Basically all attacks are remediated by this. No need for Cloudflare etc.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Alternative strategies proposed include using LLM filters to detect gibberish signups, requiring users to initiate the email flow, or removing email requirements entirely &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47610337&quot; title=&quot;I absolutely refuse to use BigTech gatekeepers or useless CAPTCHAS (any sufficiently advanced bot can get around any CAPTCHA anyway). We solved this at our startup by running names through a simple LLM filter - if the name is gibberish like Px2846skxojw just block the signup. Worked surprisingly well. Of course this is easy to get around if the bot knows what you’re doing. But bots look for easy targets, as long as there are enough vibe coded crap targets on the internet they’re not going to…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47610388&quot; title=&quot;How about a signup flow where the user sends the first email? They send an email to signups@example.com (or to a generated unique address), and receive a one-time sign-in link in the reply. The service would have to be careful not to process spoofed emails though. Another approach is to not ask for an email address at all, like here on HN.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://newsroom.ibm.com/2026-04-02-ibm-announces-strategic-collaboration-with-arm-to-shape-the-future-of-enterprise-computing&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;IBM Announces Strategic Collaboration with Arm&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (newsroom.ibm.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47611721&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;265 points · 174 comments · by bonzini&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IBM and Arm have launched a strategic collaboration to develop dual-architecture hardware and virtualization technologies designed to help enterprises scale AI and data-intensive workloads with greater flexibility and security. &lt;a href=&quot;https://newsroom.ibm.com/2026-04-02-ibm-announces-strategic-collaboration-with-arm-to-shape-the-future-of-enterprise-computing&quot; title=&quot;IBM Announces Strategic Collaboration with Arm to Shape the Future of Enterprise Computing    Collaboration aims to advance new technologies that expand infrastructure choice while preserving mission-critical environments ARMONK, N.Y., April 2, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- IBM (NYSE: IBM) today...    [IBM Logo](https://www.ibm.com/)    Submit    [IBM Newsroom](index.php)    * News    + [All press releases](https://newsroom.ibm.com/announcements)    + [TechXchange 2025](tech-xchange-2025)    + [Think…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IBM maintains a dominant monopoly in the mainframe sector by providing extremely resilient, redundant hardware for industries like banking that prioritize reliability over the distributed &amp;#34;commodity hardware&amp;#34; model popularized by Google &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47612801&quot; title=&quot;Putting consumer grade (aka &amp;#39;commodity&amp;#39;) hardware in a datacenter and running your infra on it is a bit of a meme, in the sense that it&amp;#39;s not the only way of doing things. It was probably pioneered/popularized by Google but that&amp;#39;s because writing great software was their &amp;#39;hammer&amp;#39;, ie they framed every computing problem as a software problem. It was probably easier for them (= Jeff Dean) to take mediocre hardware and write a robust distributed system on top instead of the other way around. There…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47613127&quot; title=&quot;Early in my career I spent some years working at the biggest bank in Canada, they were (and still are) an enormous IBM customer. Hardware, software, consulting, and probably lots of other things I had no visibility into. Beneath the countless layers of VMs and copious weird purpose built gear like Tandem and Base24 for the ATMs was a whole bunch of true blue z/OS powered IBM mainframes chugging through thousands and thousands of interlocking COBOL programs that do everything from moving files…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that the financial sector is shifting toward distributed software on open platforms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47613243&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Credit card transactions and banking software run on this model for example TSYS is super expensive and is dying out. The current generation of banking software is very much shifting to distributed software across commodity data centers.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47613149&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Credit card transactions and banking software run on this model for example Eh, they can but even a couple of decades ago there was a shift to open platforms. 90s and early 00s, sure, it was mainframe and exotic x86 species like Stratus machines. But even then the power of “throw a ton of cheaper Unix at it” was winning. Banks’ central systems maybe, I have less experience there. IBM did also try for a while to ride the Linux virtualisation wave as well, saying “hey, you can run thousands of…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, IBM continues to integrate modern technologies, such as introducing ARM64 virtualization on its s390 architecture to leverage a broader software ecosystem &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47612365&quot; title=&quot;Ah, that explains this patchset that was submitted to the Linux kernel today &amp;#39;KVM: s390: Introduce arm64 KVM&amp;#39; &amp;#39;By introducing a novel virtualization acceleration for the ARM architecture on  s390 architecture, we aim to expand the platform&amp;#39;s software ecosystem. This  initial patch series lays the groundwork by enabling KVM-accelerated ARM CPU  virtualization on s390.....&amp;#39; https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/cover/...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47612040&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; dual‑architecture hardware that helps enterprises run future AI and data intensive workloads with greater flexibility, reliability, and security I think we can ignore the &amp;#39;AI&amp;#39; word here as its presence is only because everything currently has to be AI. So why would IBM add ARM? &amp;gt; As enterprises scale AI and modernize their infrastructure, the breadth of the Arm software ecosystem is enabling these workloads to run across a broader range of environments I think it has become too expensive for…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Commentators suggest this move may be a strategic response to the high costs of proprietary CPU development, allowing IBM to offer flexible, high-performance hardware while maintaining its legacy service and consulting business &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47612454&quot; title=&quot;This is a serious question. What does IBM, in fact, do? I&amp;#39;m surprised they are still around and apparently relevant. Are they more or less a services and consulting company now?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47612040&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; dual‑architecture hardware that helps enterprises run future AI and data intensive workloads with greater flexibility, reliability, and security I think we can ignore the &amp;#39;AI&amp;#39; word here as its presence is only because everything currently has to be AI. So why would IBM add ARM? &amp;gt; As enterprises scale AI and modernize their infrastructure, the breadth of the Arm software ecosystem is enabling these workloads to run across a broader range of environments I think it has become too expensive for…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47613127&quot; title=&quot;Early in my career I spent some years working at the biggest bank in Canada, they were (and still are) an enormous IBM customer. Hardware, software, consulting, and probably lots of other things I had no visibility into. Beneath the countless layers of VMs and copious weird purpose built gear like Tandem and Base24 for the ATMs was a whole bunch of true blue z/OS powered IBM mainframes chugging through thousands and thousands of interlocking COBOL programs that do everything from moving files…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-04-01</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-04-01</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nasa.gov/blogs/missions/2026/04/01/live-artemis-ii-launch-day-updates/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Artemis II Launch Day Updates&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nasa.gov)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47603657&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1095 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 951 comments · by apitman&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NASA is providing live coverage and real-time updates for the Artemis II mission launch, which will send a crew of four astronauts on a journey around the Moon. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nasa.gov/blogs/missions/2026/04/01/live-artemis-ii-launch-day-updates/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.youtube.com&amp;amp;#x2F;live&amp;amp;#x2F;Tf_UjBMIzNo&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.youtube.com&amp;amp;#x2F;live&amp;amp;#x2F;Tf_UjBMIzNo&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Artemis II mission has sparked a debate between those who view it as a noble, psychologically vital showcase of human potential &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47606861&quot; title=&quot;Regardless of whether this particular mission is perfectly planned, this is precisely the kind of thing that will help humanity outgrow the dark age of war, inequality and climate mismanagement. It is a noble endeavor - science, engineering and peaceful exploration hold the keys to our survival and prosperity. It is also important psychologically to our survival - a reminder there is a bigger pie, that we can solve hard problems, that progress can be made, that competence and education counts,…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47604345&quot; title=&quot;Do you watch sports, football, the Olympics? If not I&amp;#39;m sure you know someone who does. Same category as this. Each of the 32 NFL team is worth about the cost of 1-2 Artemis launches. The entire league could fund the whole Artemis program nearly twice. Hosting the Olympics is worth about 3-10 launches. Like sports, the objective is ultimately useless except as a showcase of what humanity has to offer, and people like to see that.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt; and critics who argue the resources would be better spent on Earth&amp;#39;s immediate problems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47603983&quot; title=&quot;Out of curiosity, why do you see this as a worthwhile endeavor? My personal perspective is that the resources are better used for other purposes, but it&amp;#39;s possible that I just haven&amp;#39;t encountered some compelling reason yet.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see the mission as a testament to government capability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47607611&quot; title=&quot;I do hope the doomers who think that the entire US government has been completely gutted will take note of this. The government workforce is in a bad spot for sure, SLS is far from a perfect program, but this still demonstrates that we are doing some real work still.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others dismiss the SLS rocket as a &amp;#34;travesty&amp;#34; of outdated, overpriced technology &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47608297&quot; title=&quot;There is no technological innovation in the Artemis stack. Three of the main engines are refurbished Shuttle engines.  The fourth is a clone that cost more than the entire SpaceX Starship stack. The boosters are derived from the Shuttle SRBs. It&amp;#39;s a late-60s technology rocket stack with a 2000s-era flight computer. It&amp;#39;s such a travesty.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant anxiety persists regarding the safety of the crew, particularly due to unresolved heat shield issues observed during the previous mission &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47604551&quot; title=&quot;It is a bit chilling to watch these astronaut profiles having just read yesterday about the heat shield issues observed on the prior mission, and that this will be the first time we can test the heat shield in the actual pressures and temperatures that it will have to endure. Godspeed crew of Artemis II.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47605356&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;ll probably turn out fine (in the same way that you&amp;#39;ll probably survive one round of Russian roulette.)  I am quite nervous about this though.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ccunpacked.dev/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Claude Code Unpacked : A visual guide&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ccunpacked.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47597085&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1115 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 402 comments · by autocracy101&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This visual guide explores the leaked source code of Claude Code, which was exposed via a map file in the NPM registry and revealed internal tools, regex patterns, and an undercover mode. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ccunpacked.dev/&quot; title=&quot;Related ongoing threads:&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;The Claude Code Source Leak: fake tools, frustration regexes, undercover mode&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47586778&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47586778&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt; - March 2026 (406 comments)&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Claude Code&amp;amp;#x27;s source code has been leaked via a map file in their NPM registry&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The massive 500,000-line codebase for Claude Code has sparked a debate over whether such volume represents &amp;#34;meaningful complexity&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;vibecoded&amp;#34; bloat caused by AI-generated technical debt &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47598940&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; 500k lines of code Isn&amp;#39;t it a simple REPL with some tools and integrations, written in a very high level language? How the hell is it so big? Is it because it&amp;#39;s vibecoded and LLMs strive for bloat, or is it meaningful complexity?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47597432&quot; title=&quot;I guess they really do eat their own dogfood and vibe code their way through it without care for technical debt? In a way, it’s a good challenge, but it’s fairly painful to watch the current state of the project (which is about a year old now, so it should be in prime shape).&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Some argue the scale is a necessary &amp;#34;state-management nightmare&amp;#34; required to force probabilistic LLMs to behave deterministically through defensive programming, tool-retry loops, and context sanitizers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47599312&quot; title=&quot;A 500k line codebase for an agent CLI proves one thing: making a probabilistic LLM behave deterministically is a massive state-management nightmare. Right now, they&amp;#39;re great for prompting simple sites/platforms but they break at large enterprise repos. If you don&amp;#39;t have a rigid, external state machine governing the workflow, you have to brute-force reliability. That codebase bloat is likely 90% defensive programming; frustration regexes, context sanitizers, tool-retry loops, and state rollbacks…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47599617&quot; title=&quot;I know it seems counter-intuitive but are there any agent harnesses that aren’t written with AI?  All these half a million LoC codebases seem insane to me when I run my business on a full-stack web application that’s like 50k lines of code and my MvP was like 10k.  These are just TUIs that call a model endpoint with some shell-out commands.  These things have only been around in time measured in months, half a million LoC is crazy to me.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While critics contend a TUI wrapper should only require 20,000 to 50,000 lines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47599194&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a TUI API wrapper with a few commands bolted on. I doubt it needs to be more than 20-50kloc. You can create a full 3D game with a custom 3D engine in 500k lines. What the hell is Claude Code doing?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that similar agent harnesses from competitors like OpenAI and Google maintain similarly large codebases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47599994&quot; title=&quot;I just checked competitors&amp;#39; codebases: - Opencode (anomalyco/opencode) is about 670k LOC - Codex (openai/codex) is about 720k LOC - Gemini (google-gemini/gemini-cli) is about 570k LOC Claude Code&amp;#39;s 500k LOC doesn&amp;#39;t seem out of the ordinary.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.cloudflare.com/emdash-wordpress/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;EmDash – A spiritual successor to WordPress that solves plugin security&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.cloudflare.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47602832&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;692 points · 500 comments · by elithrar&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudflare has introduced EmDash, an open-source, TypeScript-based CMS designed as a secure successor to WordPress that uses serverless &amp;#34;sandboxed&amp;#34; plugins to prevent vulnerabilities. It features built-in AI agent support, native x402 content monetization, and an Astro-powered architecture that scales to zero when not in use. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.cloudflare.com/emdash-wordpress/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Introducing EmDash — the spiritual successor to WordPress that solves plugin security    URL Source: https://blog.cloudflare.com/emdash-wordpress/    Published Time: 2026-04-01T14:00+01:00    Markdown Content:  2026-04-01    11 min read    ![Image 1](https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/5VnjnsSUePsv89JB4JiwI/1d69cc5560e220b4e9445aa21b939d83/EmDash-big.png)    The cost of building software has drastically decreased. We recently [rebuilt Next.js in one…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The announcement of EmDash, a TypeScript-based CMS powered by Astro and Cloudflare Workers, sparked a debate over whether &amp;#34;vibe-coding&amp;#34; with AI agents can produce a viable successor to WordPress &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47604154&quot; title=&quot;Convince me this isn’t vibeslop. If Cloudflare really have radically changed their software development philosophy lately, this would actually be an interesting project, being based on Astro and coming with some APIs for programmatic management. Them being so happy about the „cost of software development“ and not going very deep into ecosystem, community or project management doesn’t convince me that this is going to be a worthwhile project, even if, unlike their previous vibe coding demos,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47604625&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m the main engineer on this. I&amp;#39;ve also been on the Astro core team for two years, so I do think I understand real open source software and community. As the post implies, I did use a lot of agent time on this, but this isn&amp;#39;t a vibe-coded weekend project. I&amp;#39;ve been working full time on this since mid-January.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47603112&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Our name for this new CMS is EmDash. We think of it as the spiritual successor to WordPress. It’s written entirely in TypeScript. It is serverless, but you can run it on your own hardware or any platform you choose. Plugins are securely sandboxed and can run in their own isolate, via Dynamic Workers, solving the fundamental security problem with the WordPress plugin architecture. And under the hood, EmDash is powered by Astro, the fastest web framework for content-driven websites. To me this…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While the lead engineer defended the project as a serious, months-long effort &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47604625&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m the main engineer on this. I&amp;#39;ve also been on the Astro core team for two years, so I do think I understand real open source software and community. As the post implies, I did use a lot of agent time on this, but this isn&amp;#39;t a vibe-coded weekend project. I&amp;#39;ve been working full time on this since mid-January.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, skeptics argued that it lacks the essential ecosystem and community support that makes WordPress valuable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47603398&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think it&amp;#39;s the code that makes WordPress valuable. I&amp;#39;ve been learning WordPress recently and haven&amp;#39;t been too impressed with the internals. WordPress is valuable because of the ecosystem and support. I have no doubt that WordPress will still be a thing in ten years. What&amp;#39;s the support plan for EmDash? I see commits are mostly from a single developer. E: Oh, I think it&amp;#39;s an April fools joke, I&amp;#39;m embarrassed. E2: Apparently not a joke.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47604852&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;It&amp;#39;s not a vibe-coded weekend project, it&amp;#39;s a vibe-coded months long project&amp;#39; doesn&amp;#39;t terribly instill confidence.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics also questioned the technical direction, suggesting that a modern CMS should focus on static file generation rather than server-side rendering &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47603112&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Our name for this new CMS is EmDash. We think of it as the spiritual successor to WordPress. It’s written entirely in TypeScript. It is serverless, but you can run it on your own hardware or any platform you choose. Plugins are securely sandboxed and can run in their own isolate, via Dynamic Workers, solving the fundamental security problem with the WordPress plugin architecture. And under the hood, EmDash is powered by Astro, the fastest web framework for content-driven websites. To me this…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47603525&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a shame they don&amp;#39;t seem to try to address the divide between CMS&amp;#39;s and static sites. Most WordPress sites could just be static, but WordPress has a nice editor interface, so they&amp;#39;re not - unless you use a SSG plugin. Building that into the core workflow (which I believe Astro supports) and giving users a nice hosted editor that produces a static site would be welcome innovation.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, while others debated the merits of using JavaScript for AI-generated projects over languages like Go &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47604294&quot; title=&quot;Serious question: Why is everyone still using JavaScript to AI-code projects? You can vibe-code apps with real languages now. There&amp;#39;s no reason to use an interpreted, bloated, weird language anymore. The only reason interpreted languages were a thing was so you could edit a file and re-run it immediately without a compile step. Compiling is now cheap, and you don&amp;#39;t have to build expertise in a new language anymore. Ask AI to write your app in Go, it&amp;#39;ll happily comply. Run it and it&amp;#39;s faster…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/dram-pricing-is-killing-the-hobbyist-sbc-market/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;DRAM pricing is killing the hobbyist SBC market&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jeffgeerling.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47606840&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;629 points · 542 comments · by ingve&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rising DRAM costs have forced Raspberry Pi and other vendors to significantly increase prices, threatening the hobbyist single-board computer market as high-end models like the 16GB Pi 5 reach nearly $300. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/dram-pricing-is-killing-the-hobbyist-sbc-market/&quot; title=&quot;Title: DRAM pricing is killing the hobbyist SBC market    URL Source: https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/dram-pricing-is-killing-the-hobbyist-sbc-market/    Published Time: 2026-04-01T16:00:00-05:00    Markdown Content:  # DRAM pricing is killing the hobbyist SBC market - Jeff Geerling    [Jeff…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current DRAM price surge—notably a six-fold increase for some DDR5 modules—is severely impacting the Single Board Computer (SBC) and smartphone markets, with forecasts suggesting mid-range phone volumes could halve &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47607712&quot; title=&quot;This time is different. https://ca.pcpartpicker.com/trends/price/memory/#ram.ddr5.60... The price for a couple of 32GB sticks is now over $1200 after being stable at about $200 for several years until last September. That&amp;#39;s not a blip; that&amp;#39;s 6-fold hike and there is no sign it is slowing down any time soon.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47608294&quot; title=&quot;In the Dwarkesh podcast with Semi-Analysis&amp;#39;s Dylan Patel they forecast the phone market will shrink by 50% this year because of RAM prices: But that’s the high end of the market, which is only a few hundred million phones a year. Apple sells two or three hundred million phones annually. The bulk of the market is mid-range and low-end. It used to be that 1.4 billion smartphones were sold a year. Now we’re at about 1.1 billion. Our projections are that we might drop to 800 million this year, and…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this is a temporary geopolitical or supply chain &amp;#34;blip&amp;#34; similar to COVID-era shortages, others contend the scale of this hike is unprecedented and may force a return to memory-efficient software design &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47607437&quot; title=&quot;There are ups and downs in the prices of components. Often people forget that during COVID prices were high for SBCs because of supply chain issues. Video cards just were not available in the UK and afterwards (every supplier had long lead times) and are still relatively expensive (at least there are now lower priced options). Raspberry Pis you couldn&amp;#39;t get hold of and many people (Jeff Included) was using a website checking for availability which was non-existent for anything other than low…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47607151&quot; title=&quot;it&amp;#39;s probably time to call those old retired programmers to ask them how to reduce software memory footprint or to teach that again&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47607712&quot; title=&quot;This time is different. https://ca.pcpartpicker.com/trends/price/memory/#ram.ddr5.60... The price for a couple of 32GB sticks is now over $1200 after being stable at about $200 for several years until last September. That&amp;#39;s not a blip; that&amp;#39;s 6-fold hike and there is no sign it is slowing down any time soon.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Disagreements persist over whether hardware is truly unavailable or merely prohibitively expensive, as well as whether emerging helium shortages will further prolong this &amp;#34;peak technology&amp;#34; plateau &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47608167&quot; title=&quot;I am in the UK. Not the US! &amp;gt; If you were offering 5x MSRP and you couldn&amp;#39;t get a video card... I don&amp;#39;t believe you. My 1080Ti had died. I had to use a 8800GTS from the late 2000s for about a year. As that was the only GPU I had. I have no iGPU on my CPU. There was at one time, no stock available. Not on Amazon, Not on Overclockers, Not on Scan. They had some weird lotto system taking place on most sites. Scalpers claimed to have cards. But I wouldn&amp;#39;t risk sending a lot of money to some random…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47607226&quot; title=&quot;That’s strange, there aren’t wider market supply chain issues outside of DRAM. Maybe your vendor is just throwing excuses around.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47607703&quot; title=&quot;Helium supply issues are only going to make this worse. I feel like for the first time in our lives we might have seen peak technology for the next few years. Everyone is going to have to make do instead of depending on ever increasing performance.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/01/technology/spacex-ipo-elon-musk.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SpaceX files to go public&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nytimes.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47604155&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;398 points · &lt;strong&gt;575 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by nutjob2&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Elon Musk’s SpaceX has reportedly filed confidentially for an initial public offering, aiming to raise up to $75 billion in a June debut that could value the aerospace and satellite company at over $1 trillion. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/01/technology/spacex-ipo-elon-musk.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Elon Musk’s SpaceX Files to Go Public, Setting Stage for Huge I.P.O.    URL Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/01/technology/spacex-ipo-elon-musk.html    Published Time: 2026-04-01T17:26:10.000Z    Markdown Content:  You have been granted access, use your keyboard to continue reading.    ![Image 1: A tall, metallic spacecraft, reflecting golden light, is suspended by a crane against a pale…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SpaceX&amp;#39;s public filing has sparked debate over its $1.75 trillion valuation, with supporters citing its massive lead in launch costs and Starlink’s potential to dominate global internet infrastructure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47607023&quot; title=&quot;SpaceX has reduced the cost of getting a ton of mass into orbit by a factor of 10 and with their new system (Starship) it&amp;#39;s poised further reduce that to 100x. They launch, land and re-use their rockets so often now that what was considered impossible 15 years ago is now routine. They currently put more things into space than the rest of the world combined and by a huge margin. They also have the most advanced internet infrastructure in the world and are poised to replace legacy ISPs and even…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47607110&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m genuinely waiting to see at what the valuation lands at. The gap between what SpaceX charges per launch and what everyone else charges is so wide that the moat basically is the rocket. Hard to compare against anything even now.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some investors believe this price is justified by the long-term goal of Mars colonization, others argue the valuation is inflated by financial engineering and the controversial inclusion of xAI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47605754&quot; title=&quot;I really wish more people were aware of this. It&amp;#39;s a major scandal and definitely not being talked enough about. Nevermind SpaceX, which at least have some importance for US defense industry, but xAI ? We will be investing in Elon&amp;#39;s private venture, at the price that he himself set and which is at least 2 orders of magnitude too high...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47608429&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m a SpaceX investor, and from reading the comments here, I think most people here are missing why SpaceX has an outrageously high valuation. SpaceX&amp;#39;s valuation only makes sense if you buy into their mission of creating a civilization on Mars, and that the Space Exploration Technologies Corporation is the vehicle that creates this future. If SpaceX achieves this, it would be the most valuable company ever created. It would be worth $10s of trillions. I personally believe SpaceX has a 70%…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Concerns also persist regarding index fund mechanics that may force automatic buying of the stock shortly after launch, potentially shielding the initial price from traditional market skepticism &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47605398&quot; title=&quot;You don&amp;#39;t have to believe. If you have a 401k you will be an investor 15 days after launch. The IPO will go great, because the company will float a fairly small issuance. The big shareholders will not immediately sell. They will hold on and maybe even buy to support the price. Then, after 15 days, it will enter the indexes and everyone&amp;#39;s 401k will start auto-buying this stock. You might say this is an obvious flaw in how the indexes work if they start immediately accept a brand new IPOed stock…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47605754&quot; title=&quot;I really wish more people were aware of this. It&amp;#39;s a major scandal and definitely not being talked enough about. Nevermind SpaceX, which at least have some importance for US defense industry, but xAI ? We will be investing in Elon&amp;#39;s private venture, at the price that he himself set and which is at least 2 orders of magnitude too high...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dbushell.com/2026/04/01/i-quit-the-clankers-won/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I quit. The clankers won&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (dbushell.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47598511&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;422 points · &lt;strong&gt;480 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by domysee&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Web developer David Bushell argues that blogging is more essential than ever as a way to preserve authentic human voices and professional authority against the rise of AI-generated content and &amp;#34;big tech&amp;#34; exploitation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dbushell.com/2026/04/01/i-quit-the-clankers-won/&quot; title=&quot;Title: I quit. The clankers won.    URL Source: https://dbushell.com/2026/04/01/i-quit-the-clankers-won/    Published Time: Wed, 01 Apr 2026 06:50:05 GMT    Markdown Content:  # I quit. The clankers won. – David Bushell – Web Dev (UK)    ![Image 1](https://dbushell.com/assets/images/dbushell-logotype.svg)    [dbushell.com](https://dbushell.com/)freelance     Menu   # I quit. The clankers won.    Subscribe[Blog RSS feed](https://dbushell.com/rss.xml)[Notes RSS…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of AI in software engineering has sparked a debate over whether traditional coding skills are becoming obsolete or simply evolving into higher-level oversight roles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47600625&quot; title=&quot;This is going to catch some heat, but what if the most important professional “developer skill” to learn or improve is how to effectively use coding agents? I saw something similar in ML when neural nets came around. The whole “stack moar layerz” thing is a meme, but it was a real sentiment about newer entrants into the field not learning anything about ML theory or best practices. As it turns out, neural nets “won” and using them effectively required development and acquisition of some new…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47601120&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; what if the most important professional “developer skill” to learn or improve is how to effectively use coding agents? Well, it&amp;#39;s not. There&amp;#39;s a small moat around that right now because the UX is still being ironed out, but in a short while able to use coding agents will be the new able to use Excel . What will remain are the things that already differentiate a good developer from a bad one: - Able to review the output of coding agents - Able to guide the architecture of an application - Able…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that corporate &amp;#34;FOMO&amp;#34; is driving a deskilling trend that treats developers as mere AI operators &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47600071&quot; title=&quot;Improving developer skills is not valuable to your company. They don&amp;#39;t tell a customer how many person-hours of engineering talent improvement their contract is responsible for. They just want a solved problem.   Some companies comprehend how short-sighted this is and invest in professional development in one way or another. They want better engineers so that their operations run better. It&amp;#39;s an investment and arguably a smart one. Adoption of AI at a FOMO corporate pace doesn&amp;#39;t seem to include…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47600182&quot; title=&quot;The irony is that the vast deskilling that&amp;#39;s happening because of this means that most &amp;#39;software engineers&amp;#39; will become incapable of understanding, let alone fixing or even building new versions of the systems that they are utterly dependent on. There should be thousands or tens of thousands people worldwide that can build the operating systems, virtual machines, libraries, containers, and applications that AI is built on. But the number will dwindle and we&amp;#39;ll ironically be unable to build what…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that these tools offer unprecedented productivity, allowing individuals to build complex products in a fraction of the time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47600565&quot; title=&quot;This is silly.  I can build products in a weekend that would take me a year by myself.  I am still necessary 1% of the time for debug, design, and direction and those of not at all a shallow skill.  I have some graduate algebra texts on the way my math friend is guiding me through because I have found a publishable result and need to shore up my background before writing the paper... It&amp;#39;s not perpetual motion, it&amp;#39;s very real capability, you just have to be able to learn how to use it.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47600226&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The giant plagiarism machines have already stolen everything. Copyright is dead. Licenses are washed away in clean rooms. Isn&amp;#39;t this what the free software movement wanted? Code available to all? Yes, code is cheap now. That&amp;#39;s the new reality. Your value lies elsewhere. You can lament the loss of your usefulness as a horse buggy mechanic, or you can adapt your knowledge and experience and use it towards those newfangled automobiles.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant disagreement regarding company investment in professional development, with experiences ranging from genuine support to dismissive &amp;#34;lip service&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47600156&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Improving developer skills is not valuable to your company Every company I&amp;#39;ve ever worked at has genuinely believed in and invested in improving developer skills.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47600414&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve worked for 35ish companies (contract and fulltime), largely on the west coast of the US. I have experienced the lip service, from the vast majority. I have experienced maybe 2 or 3 earnest attempts at growing engineer skills through subsidized admission/travel to talks, tools, or invited instructors.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, many believe the industry is shifting toward a model where value lies in architectural guidance, system review, and interpreting business needs rather than manual implementation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47601120&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; what if the most important professional “developer skill” to learn or improve is how to effectively use coding agents? Well, it&amp;#39;s not. There&amp;#39;s a small moat around that right now because the UX is still being ironed out, but in a short while able to use coding agents will be the new able to use Excel . What will remain are the things that already differentiate a good developer from a bad one: - Able to review the output of coding agents - Able to guide the architecture of an application - Able…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47601859&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ask HN: Who is hiring? (April 2026)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47601859&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;276 points · &lt;strong&gt;362 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by whoishiring&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This Hacker News thread serves as a monthly job board where companies post active ONSITE and REMOTE openings directly to potential candidates. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47601859&quot; title=&quot;Please state the location and include REMOTE for remote work, REMOTE (US)  or similar if the country is restricted, and ONSITE when remote work is &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;not&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; an option.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Please only post if you personally are part of the hiring company—no  recruiting firms or job boards. One post per company. If it isn&amp;amp;#x27;t a household name,  explain what your company does.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Please only post if you are actively filling a position and are committed  to replying to applicants.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Commenters: please don&amp;amp;#x27;t…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The April 2026 hiring thread features a diverse range of roles, from founding engineers at AI-native real estate and database observability startups &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47602417&quot; title=&quot;Assembly | Founding Engineer | New York City, Onsite | Full-Time Assembly is a vertically-integrated, technology-native holding company that acquires industrial real estate. We take an AI-native approach across the full surface area of our business; data-based geography selection, owner outreach, due diligence, deal structuring / scenario analysis, property &amp;amp; tenant management, and more. Our intention is to build one of the largest real estate companies in the world, and to be the most…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47603975&quot; title=&quot;BetterDB ( https://betterdb.com ) ( https://github.com/BetterDB-inc ) | Founding Engineer | Remote | Full-time BetterDB is building the tooling ecosystem for Valkey, the high-performance Redis fork backed by AWS, Google, and Oracle. We&amp;#39;re starting with observability — historical persistence, pattern analysis, anomaly detection, and Prometheus export — so you can debug what happened at 3am when you wake up at 9am. Stack: TypeScript, NestJS + Fastify, React, Valkey, PostgreSQL, Docker,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt; to leadership positions at established platforms like FetLife &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47601882&quot; title=&quot;Head of Engineering &amp;amp; Infrastructure | Full-Time | Remote | $182k - $272k USD - https://fetlife.com/jobs/head_of_engineering_and_infrastruct... Role: Fully own our engineering and infrastructure teams, keep FetLife fast and reliable for over 12 million members, and free the rest of the leadership team to focus on product and growth. How to Apply: Email jointheteam+hoei+hn@fetlife.com with a brief introduction, tell us about the impact you have personally made on an engineering or infrastructure…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable opportunities include building foundation models for tabular data at Prior Labs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47605247&quot; title=&quot;Prior Labs | Berlin / Freiburg / NYC | ONSITE | Full-time | Multiple Roles Tables power every clinical trial, financial model, and scientific experiment, but deep learning has mostly ignored them. No natural sequence, no spatial structure, no shared vocabulary across datasets. LLM architectures don&amp;#39;t transfer. We built TabPFN, the first foundation model that actually understands tabular data (published in Nature, 3M+ downloads, new SOTA for tabular ML). The hardest problems are still open. The…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, developing open-source data platforms at Stackable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47605460&quot; title=&quot;Stackable | Product Engineer - Web &amp;amp; UI | Remote (Germany/UK) | ~20 people | Full or part-time We build an open source data platform on Kubernetes.  The product (Stackable Data Platform - SDP) bundles 12+ open source data tools (Trino, Apache Kafka, Apache Airflow, Apache Superset, etc.) and makes them work together.  Right now everything is Infrastructure-as-Code only. We need someone to build a UI layer on top. No mockups, no Figma, no product roadmap waiting for you I&amp;#39;m afraid, just a bunch of…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, and engineering next-generation nuclear reactors at Oklo &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47603039&quot; title=&quot;Oklo | Remote (US) or Santa Clara or Brooklyn | Full time | https://oklo.com Join us in pioneering the next generation of nuclear reactors! You&amp;#39;ll leverage your software skills alongside nuclear engineers to model, simulate, design, and deploy advanced fission power technology. You will work at the forefront of the nuclear industry, developing novel techniques to reach new levels of safety, efficiency, and resiliency. Come be a part of powering the future with advanced fission power plants to…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some candidates expressed skepticism regarding application requirements, questioning if requests to install products before applying are methods to artificially inflate active user metrics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47608017&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; To apply, first run BetterDB and use your email as the license key for npm/docker, for cloud just register with the same email you are applying. I get why people want someone to use their product to see if they&amp;#39;d want to work on it, but as an observation, see this as an increasing trend and seeing half of a &amp;#39;I&amp;#39;m hiring&amp;#39; post dedicated to &amp;#39;Hey, install our product, here&amp;#39;s how&amp;#39; gives hints of companies who are basically harvesting potential job candidates for DAUs...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/siddharthvaddem/openscreen&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OpenScreen is an open-source alternative to Screen Studio&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595695&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;426 points · 71 comments · by jskopek&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenScreen is a free, open-source screen recorder and demo creation tool designed as a subscription-free alternative to Screen Studio, featuring automatic zooming, motion blur, and video annotation capabilities for personal and commercial use. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/siddharthvaddem/openscreen&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - siddharthvaddem/openscreen: Create stunning demos for free. Open-source, no subscriptions, no watermarks, and free for commercial use. An alternative to Screen Studio.    URL Source: https://github.com/siddharthvaddem/openscreen    Markdown Content:  # GitHub - siddharthvaddem/openscreen: Create stunning demos for free. Open-source, no subscriptions, no watermarks, and free for commercial use. An alternative to Screen Studio. · GitHub    [Skip to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While users acknowledge that Screen Studio’s automated motion and zooming features save significant time compared to complex editors like DaVinci Resolve &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645554&quot; title=&quot;Am I in the minority for thinking ScreenStudio is actually worth the money? The recent video I did for Cling for example ( https://lowtechguys.com/cling ) I’ve had many people ask about how I did it because it has just the right amount of motion and highlighting. I did it in a few minutes of editing in the ScreenStudio UI. I’m not saying it’s a great video, but people say it conveys the info well enough and that’s what matters. It would have taken me days to do the same with DaVinci Resolve…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, there is strong consensus that its $30/month subscription model is frustrating for a tool used only occasionally &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645651&quot; title=&quot;I think it&amp;#39;s mostly just that a subscription seems weird for a tool like this. Most users would probably only need it occasionally, and with a subscription you can&amp;#39;t just add it to your toolbox to grab when that time comes.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645735&quot; title=&quot;IMO a big disservice to the universe has been done with the recurring revenue drive. Many services could/should offer a one-shot option, with the highest margin. Somehow the world got stuck on SaaS model so hard that one off is completely ignored. I know why the capital class loves MRR I&amp;#39;m just mad that OTC is ignored.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47646166&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; A $30/month subscription is indeed too much, but I see it as a one time payment for that month when I release something, then I pause the subscription. I need it rarely, very few videos need zooming and motion. If I think something is worth the money, I typically don&amp;#39;t need to actively decide to pause the subscription each time I use it.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Some participants argue that developers are forced into SaaS models because one-time payments often fail to cover long-term maintenance costs for niche desktop apps &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647380&quot; title=&quot;I am struggling with finding a good model for desktop apps. The subscription model always seems to yield the most money, but I too dislike subscriptions. One-shot option seems attractive, but the desktop (MacOS at least) app market is actually so niche that the SAM is somewhere in the low thousands. So, if I would offer a one-time 100$ app, I&amp;#39;d have 100k$ before taxes. And for that revenue, there&amp;#39;s developing, marketing, plus support and maintenance. So to match a dev&amp;#39;s salary, I&amp;#39;d need to make…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also focused on how OpenScreen compares to existing tools, with users questioning its advantages over OBS, the open-source Cap, or built-in macOS features like QuickTime &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47644651&quot; title=&quot;Does this have any advantages over OBS Studio?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47645804&quot; title=&quot;Looks awesome! Super excited to try it. What are pros / cons over Cap? https://cap.so/ - also open source https://github.com/CapSoftware/cap&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47647454&quot; title=&quot;There is, using QuickTime. The repo just fails to mention the benefits of this by assuming everyone knows what Screen Studio is and does.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://home.cern/news/news/engineering/cern-levels-new-superconducting-karts&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;CERN levels up with new superconducting karts&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (home.cern)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47597935&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;394 points · 85 comments · by fnands&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CERN engineers have developed superconducting, levitating karts to replace bicycles in the Large Hadron Collider tunnel, allowing technicians to travel quickly during upcoming major upgrades. &lt;a href=&quot;https://home.cern/news/news/engineering/cern-levels-new-superconducting-karts&quot; title=&quot;Title: CERN levels up with new superconducting karts    URL Source: https://home.cern/news/news/engineering/cern-levels-new-superconducting-karts    Published Time: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 06:00:21 GMT    Markdown Content:  # CERN levels up with new superconducting karts | CERN  [Skip to main content](https://home.cern/news/news/engineering/cern-levels-new-superconducting-karts#main-content)    # [CERN Accelerating science](https://home.cern/ &amp;#39;CERN&amp;#39;)    *         *   [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The CERN announcement was widely recognized as an April Fools&amp;#39; Day joke, with readers pointing to clues like the project lead&amp;#39;s name and the school director being named &amp;#34;Pfirsich&amp;#34; (German for Peach) &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47599161&quot; title=&quot;This got me.  Thought it was real, busted out laughing when I read the project leads name. It still didn&amp;#39;t click.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47599251&quot; title=&quot;Small clue here too, maybe more subtle: &amp;gt; explained school director, Rosalina Pfirsich, looking up from her storybook Pfirsich in German means Peach, as in Princess Peach :D&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47598079&quot; title=&quot;Happy April Fools Day!&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users appreciated the &amp;#34;whimsy&amp;#34; as a break from global grimness, others criticized the use of public funds for such stunts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47598466&quot; title=&quot;Meh joke considering this was paid on public money. Same as choosing to spend xxx,xxx USD to have .cern when using subdomains would have worked too (and caused less validation / compatibility issues).&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47600493&quot; title=&quot;Someone was saying &amp;#39;can we just not with April fools&amp;#39; this year because everything is so grim and dire in the world... but I think this is such a perfect level we need. I could go for more whimsy like this.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The thread also sparked a debate on skepticism versus optimism, drawing parallels to the previous hype surrounding room-temperature superconductors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47601285&quot; title=&quot;Takes me back to the week we all thought room temperature super conductors might be a solved problem.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47602114&quot; title=&quot;That served a useful purpose- it let you objectively identify how gullible everyone you know is.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47602495&quot; title=&quot;If your hope for the future is based on believing the most obviously-impossible technological claim in the world, you&amp;#39;re way more cynical than I am.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.science.org/content/article/neanderthals-survived-knife-s-edge-350-000-years&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Neanderthals survived on a knife&amp;#39;s edge for 350k years&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (science.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595572&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;238 points · 204 comments · by Hooke&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am unable to summarize the story because the provided link returned a security error and the content consists only of a bot verification message. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.science.org/content/article/neanderthals-survived-knife-s-edge-350-000-years&quot; title=&quot;Title: Just a moment...    URL Source: https://www.science.org/content/article/neanderthals-survived-knife-s-edge-350-000-years    Warning: Target URL returned error 403: Forbidden  Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: Icon for www.science.org](https://www.science.org/favicon.ico)    ## www.science.org    ## Performing security verification    This website uses a security service to protect against malicious bots. This page is…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a debate over whether ancient life was a constant struggle for survival &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47598129&quot; title=&quot;Can&amp;#39;t imagine having to live with anxiety of just staying alive. Constant diseases, infestations, starvation, animal attacks. You would never feel like you have time to just, be. Instead you&amp;#39;re focused on getting your next meal, and finding a place to sleep. It only took a few ice-ages to force us to get smart about how we organize and then here we are.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt; or a period of relative leisure where hunter-gatherers worked only 20 hours a week &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47600047&quot; title=&quot;Here&amp;#39;s some food for thought: Something like that was their normal and they likely had all of these sorted out with relative ease, given that they&amp;#39;d be experts at that kind of living. Also wild food sources were plentiful. Overall they may have enjoyed more downtime than us, who have to do quite a bit to maintain our higher standards of living. Estimates are that hunter-gatherers &amp;#39;worked&amp;#39; around 20 hours / week to sustain themselves, the rest being spend on low intensity tasks or idle time.…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters dispute the timeline and classification of Neanderthals, noting that the &amp;#34;muddle in the middle&amp;#34; makes it difficult to distinguish between distinct species and their common ancestors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47597857&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;somehow Neanderthals managed to survive across most of Eurasia for nearly 400,000 years, longer than modern humans have been on Earth. These narrative simplifications end up just being confusing. Neanderthals from 400kya are often classed as Heidelbergensis. These guys were less Neanderthal-ish and more similar to us... being closer to and less divergent from the sapiens-neanderthal LCA. Neanderthal-Denisovan divergence occurs at this time.. so calling them Neanderthals rather than Neanderthal…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47598088&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Neanderthals from 400kya are often classed as Heidelbergensis. Heidelbergensis is the last common anscestor of Neanderthals, Denisovans and us. We were all around for just as long, 400kya+, and before that, it was Homo Erectus. All of them, Erectus, Heidelbergensis, Neanderthals, Denisovans and Sapiens were walking around at the same time. There&amp;#39;s plenty of fossil records we&amp;#39;ve uncovered that show that to be true. It was only in the last 100k years or so that we remained and the other…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest Neanderthals were absorbed into the modern human gene pool rather than going extinct &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47599387&quot; title=&quot;Did they really die out, or did the population just merge with modern humans? Most people on the planet have some Neanderthal DNA, so clearly there was some intermixing. If modern humans were a much larger population, it makes sense that the Neanderthals only contributed a small amount of DNA to the gene pool. I could imagine that they were just slowly absorbed into the much larger Sapiens population.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others reflect on the staggering contrast between hundreds of thousands of years of technological stagnation and the rapid acceleration following the agricultural revolution &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47596832&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s wild to think how long very human-like beings and modern humans existed before the technological revolution really took off. Hundreds of thousands of years of existing on the technological level of stone tools, spears, cloth made out of hides, and fire. Then at some unknown point probably in the last 100,000 years, the bow and arrow. Then about 12,000 years ago, the agricultural revolution, which probably unlocked much of the subsequent technological progress by enabling more food security…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47596908&quot; title=&quot;350,000 years of just chilling, picking berries, you die in identical technological and cultural environment as when you were born. Now we got to be around when God is made in a data center&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant pushback against the idea that Native Americans lacked agriculture, citing powerful civilizations that were primarily decimated by European diseases rather than a lack of technology &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47596887&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Then about 12,000 years ago, the agricultural revolution, which probably unlocked much of the subsequent technological progress by enabling more food security and larger populations. It definitely did. Also note that agriculture was invented in multiple places over time. Unfortunately, the Native Americans did not invent it quickly enough, so they had far less time for technological development before Europeans arrived. At which point, it was too late.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47597081&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Unfortunately, the Native Americans did not invent it quickly enough This is false. Most native Americans throughout both continents— especially those in Mesoamerica—were powerful civilisations in their own right with plenty of agricultural history. What finished many of them off was a lack of resistance to smallpox, which was brought over by the first explorers/colonists.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.forbes.com/sites/phoebeliu/2026/03/31/openai-graveyard-deals-and-products-havent-happened-openai/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The OpenAI graveyard: All the deals and products that haven&amp;#39;t happened&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (forbes.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47602565&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;239 points · 199 comments · by dherls&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.forbes.com/sites/phoebeliu/2026/03/31/openai-graveyard-deals-and-products-havent-happened-openai/&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Critics argue that OpenAI’s high volume of abandoned products and &amp;#34;PR puff&amp;#34; announcements suggest the company is in a desperate scramble to maintain hype amid darkening financial realities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47603297&quot; title=&quot;This is important context in the wake of yesterday’s “raise” announcement. A lot of this stuff seems to just quietly never happen once the ink on the PR puff dries. The AI industry increasingly looks in scramble mode to keep the hype going as those storm clouds of financial and business reality get darker and darker on the horizon.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47603721&quot; title=&quot;For a company bringing a new technology from zero to mainstream, I think it&amp;#39;s pretty normal that there will be a lot of failed attempts at productization. The thing that isn&amp;#39;t normal is the degree of experimentation relative to company valuation. Normally once a company reaches $700 B+ valuation, they&amp;#39;ve figured out their product and monetization strategy. ChatGPT is clearly still iterating heavily on that - not normal for a company that size.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some defend this experimentation as a necessary startup-like process of &amp;#34;launching over and over&amp;#34; to find what sticks, others note that a company with such a massive valuation should have a more established monetization strategy by now &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47603721&quot; title=&quot;For a company bringing a new technology from zero to mainstream, I think it&amp;#39;s pretty normal that there will be a lot of failed attempts at productization. The thing that isn&amp;#39;t normal is the degree of experimentation relative to company valuation. Normally once a company reaches $700 B+ valuation, they&amp;#39;ve figured out their product and monetization strategy. ChatGPT is clearly still iterating heavily on that - not normal for a company that size.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47604462&quot; title=&quot;And not normal for a company that has been at it this long. The Apple II went on sale on June 10th, 1977. Visicalc went on sale October 17th, 1979- 860 days separate the two. ChatGPT was opened to the public on November 30th, 2022, which was 1219 days ago- almost 50% more time has elapsed than between the Apple II and Visicalc.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47605547&quot; title=&quot;Lots of critiques here! Something missing in this discussion is people asking _why_ it is that they&amp;#39;re doing this. The people who work there aren&amp;#39;t stupid! I think this is a disconnect between people who think that large companies are static entities with established products vs. large companies that still operate like a startup and are trying to grow. When you&amp;#39;re building your business from $0 in revenue, you don&amp;#39;t know what will work! You try different things, you [launch over and over…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. A central debate persists over whether LLMs will eventually capture hundreds of billions in ad revenue by replacing traditional search or if they are currently subsidized tools struggling against a &amp;#34;deluge of fake content&amp;#34; and high operational costs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47603558&quot; title=&quot;The LLM usage will generate hundreds of billions of dollars in ad revenue, which will be wildly lucrative in terms of margins (not as good as Google search used to be). If GPT is a leader in that, they&amp;#39;ll take a sizable share of that pot. There&amp;#39;s a lot more money in being Google -&amp;gt; consumer ads, or Amazon -&amp;gt; consumer ads, or Meta -&amp;gt; consumer ads, than there is in being Anthropic -&amp;gt; enterprise. Just take a look at the enterprise. Amazon&amp;#39;s ad business alone is already a better business than…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47603613&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;The LLM usage will generate hundreds of billions of dollars in ad revenue, which will be wildly lucrative in terms of margins (not as good as Google search used to be). This seems like ... not the situation we are in.  LLMs are great for coding now but their text generation capabilities aren&amp;#39;t exactly capturing the masses or replacing their jobs yet. People are already tired of the deluge of fake content on the internet, it&amp;#39;s not going to drive a second revolution in web ads. The $20-200 LLM…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47603766&quot; title=&quot;LLM usage will largely replace traditional search, and that&amp;#39;s stage one. To be specific, search will be consumed by the LLMs, it&amp;#39;ll be merely an aspect of what they do for the user, and that&amp;#39;ll include handling the more intricate details of the search, refining the search, understanding the results of search, etc. The age of the typical user handling any of that is about to end. Search will more be a feature of Gemini in the not very distant future, rather than Gemini being bolted onto/into…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.npr.org/2026/03/30/nx-s1-5745926/endangered-species-committee-hegseth-security&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;U.S. exempts oil industry from protecting Gulf animals, for &amp;#39;national security&amp;#39;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (npr.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595620&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;263 points · 112 comments · by Jimmc414&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A committee of Trump administration officials unanimously voted to exempt the Gulf of Mexico&amp;#39;s oil and gas industry from Endangered Species Act requirements, citing national security and energy needs as justification for removing protections for Rice&amp;#39;s whales and other at-risk wildlife. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.npr.org/2026/03/30/nx-s1-5745926/endangered-species-committee-hegseth-security&quot; title=&quot;U.S. exempts oil industry from protecting Gulf animals, for &amp;#39;national security&amp;#39;    The &amp;#39;God Squad&amp;#39; voted unanimously to remove protections for Gulf animals, for &amp;#39;security.&amp;#39; It&amp;#39;s not the first time federal agencies cited the &amp;#39;energy emergency&amp;#39; to avoid rules meant to protect animals.    Accessibility links    * [Skip to main content](#mainContent)  * [Keyboard shortcuts for audio player](https://help.npr.org/contact/s/article?name=what-are-the-keyboard-shortcuts-for-using-the-npr-org-audio-player)    *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that labeling the exemption as &amp;#34;national security&amp;#34; is disingenuous, noting that the U.S. is already a net exporter and that the environmental cost serves corporate profit rather than domestic stability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47596253&quot; title=&quot;Of the 13 billion barrels of oil the US produces every day, 1.5 billion (15%) comes from the gulf. Despite this being more than enough oil (we are a net-exporter of oil), we import crude oil because our refineries need a different type of crude. The extra 15% of oil we are killing the environment over is for making a profit to export to other nations. It is not for national security.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Some view the move as a symptom of a &amp;#34;fundamentally anti-democratic&amp;#34; capitalist structure that prioritizes market rule over collective ecological concerns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595807&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Definitive of what capitalism is, this separation severely limits the scope of the political. Devolving vast aspects of social life to the rule of “the market” (in reality, to large corporations), it declares them off-limits to democratic decision-making, collective action, and public control. Its very structure, therefore, deprives us of the ability to decide collectively exactly what and how much we want to produce, on what energic basis and through what kinds of social relations. It…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, while others see it as a partisan effort to spite liberal environmental goals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595838&quot; title=&quot;Oppositional defiant disorder on a cultural scale. Liberals want to protect animals and shift to use of green energy; therefore the fossil fuel industry must be promoted at all cost (even when they don&amp;#39;t want to be, as with Trump forcing obsolete coal plants to remain open) and endangered animals must be killed off.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595980&quot; title=&quot;Wasn’t diversifying US energy sources also a national security issue? And wind energy was set aside because, wait for it, they killed animals.  Birds to be specific.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also reflects deep personal disillusionment with the American political trajectory, with users debating whether such government actions truly represent the will of the citizenry &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595831&quot; title=&quot;Don’t say US.  They don’t speak for us all.  Only 49.8% of voters.  Of which I hope a significant portion have seen the error of their ways come midterms and the next election. Every day is a new embarrassment law or action like this for America until then.  I’ve never felt lower about America in my lifetime.  The hope I had, the pride I felt in America, is gone, chunk by chunk, piece by piece, every day.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595932&quot; title=&quot;I always thought Trump was such a joke. Completely non-threatening, just a big personality who kept popping up here and there. I even bought a MAGA hat back in the summer before the election explicitly because I thought it was hysterical he was even running, and knew he would lose. I thought the whole thing was a gag, a joke, just like Bloomberg. It didn&amp;#39;t even cross my mind that someone so woefully inadequate for the position, so abrasive, so criminal, so disgusting -- could ever get elected…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595906&quot; title=&quot;Why? I don&amp;#39;t see this pedantry for headlines for other countries like China did this, the UK does that. I think it&amp;#39;s well understood that it&amp;#39;s referring to the government, not a generalization of its people.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/califio/publications/blob/main/MADBugs/CVE-2026-4747/write-up.md&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Claude wrote a full FreeBSD remote kernel RCE with root shell&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47597119&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;270 points · 105 comments · by ishqdehlvi&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A critical stack buffer overflow in FreeBSD&amp;#39;s kernel RPC interface (CVE-2026-4747) allows remote attackers with valid Kerberos credentials to achieve root-level code execution by bypassing length checks in the `kgssapi.ko` module to overwrite the return address and execute a multi-stage ROP chain. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/califio/publications/blob/main/MADBugs/CVE-2026-4747/write-up.md&quot; title=&quot;publications/MADBugs/CVE-2026-4747/write-up.md at main · califio/publications    Publications from Calif. Contribute to califio/publications development by creating an account on GitHub.    [Skip to content](#start-of-content)    ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [Sign in](/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcalifio%2Fpublications%2Fblob%2Fmain%2FMADBugs%2FCVE-2026-4747%2Fwrite-up.md)    Appearance settings    * Platform      + AI CODE CREATION      - [GitHub CopilotWrite better code with…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Claude did not independently discover the vulnerability in this instance, it successfully generated a working exploit when provided with a CVE write-up and human guidance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47598870&quot; title=&quot;Key point is that Claude did not find the bug it exploits. It was given the CVE writeup[1] and was asked to write a program that could exploit the bug. That said, given how things are I wouldn&amp;#39;t be surprised if you could let Claude or similar have a go at the source code of the kernel or core services, armed with some VMs for the try-fail iteration, and get it pumping out CVEs. If not now, then surely not in a too distant future. [1]:…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47599521&quot; title=&quot;They do, the whole tone and the lack of understanding of Docker, kernel threads, and everything else involved make it sound hilarious at first. But then you realize that this is all the human input that led to a working exploit in the end...&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Some participants argue that AI&amp;#39;s ability to &amp;#34;pump out&amp;#34; vulnerabilities is a positive development that allows for inexpensive patching before bad actors can profit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47603533&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; get it pumping out CVEs. Is that a good thing or bad? I see that as a very good thing. Because you can now inexpensively find those CVEs and fix them. Previously, finding CVEs was very expensive. That meant only bad actors had the incentive to look for them, since they were the ones who could profit from the effort. Now that CVEs can be found much more cheaply, people without a profit motive can discover them as well--allowing vulnerabilities to be fixed before bad actors find them.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, though others remain skeptical of the technology&amp;#39;s current autonomous capabilities and the potential bias of those promoting it &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47604964&quot; title=&quot;They tried.  It didn&amp;#39;t work that well: https://red.anthropic.com/2026/zero-days/&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47601535&quot; title=&quot;A talk given by an employee that stands to make millions from Anthropic going public, definitely not a conflict of interest by the individual.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Notably, Claude was credited with helping find the original bug mentioned in the write-up, suggesting it is already becoming an integral part of the security research process &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47598925&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Credits:        Nicholas Carlini using Claude, Anthropic Claude was used to find the bug in the first place though. That CVE write-up happened because of Claude, so while there are some very talented humans in the loop, Claude is quite involved with the whole process.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/LegalAdviceUK/comments/1s92fql/my_son_pleasured_himself_in_front_of_gemini_live/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;My son pleasured himself on Gemini Live. Entire family&amp;#39;s Google accounts banned&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (old.reddit.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595971&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;208 points · 164 comments · by samlinnfer&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A family’s Google accounts were reportedly banned after a son engaged in sexual self-gratification while using the Gemini Live AI feature. &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/LegalAdviceUK/comments/1s92fql/my_son_pleasured_himself_in_front_of_gemini_live/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Blocked    URL Source: https://old.reddit.com/r/LegalAdviceUK/comments/1s92fql/my_son_pleasured_himself_in_front_of_gemini_live/    Warning: Target URL returned error 403: Forbidden    Markdown Content:  # Blocked    # whoa there, pardner!    Your request has been blocked due to a network policy.    Try logging in or creating an account [here](https://www.reddit.com/login/) to get back to browsing.    If you&amp;#39;re running a script or application, please register or sign in with your developer credentials…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the vulnerability of individuals who rely on a single tech giant for essential digital services, with some arguing that government regulation is necessary to prevent arbitrary account terminations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47596536&quot; title=&quot;God, this is a real nightmare. I&amp;#39;m pretty reticent to rush to regulation, but I really don&amp;#39;t know what other solution is even possible here. The average person cannot realistically exist in a digital vacuum, self-hosting their entire online world. Google should not be able to do this to them. No one should have to rely on trying to whip up public mobs on Reddit or HN to get Google to give them access to their own freaking tax spreadsheets.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47596163&quot; title=&quot;The terrifying part is how much one can be dependent on services from a single company, that may at some point simply decide to not do business with you. Whether they have good reason for that is secondary. I moved away from relying on Google a while ago when I noticed, that I have zero recourse in case something happens. Turned out to be a sensible decision. I still use my google account, but only for things I wouldn&amp;#39;t miss if I the account was nuked.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. However, significant skepticism exists regarding the story&amp;#39;s authenticity, as critics point out logical inconsistencies in the timeline and the lack of reported law enforcement involvement typical of CSAM-related bans &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47596719&quot; title=&quot;Because it was obviously a creative writing exercise. I left another comment showing the contradictions in the post. The facts provided were self-contradicting and the story was full of the usual tells for creative writing posts. It was also oddly focused on email access instead of the obvious legal problems that would come from having your account flagged for CSAM. It’s like what someone would write if they were trying to imagine a story about getting locked out of their email but didn’t…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47596819&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; (One is just the observation that multiple accounts were banned, which is not actually an inconsistency? Just something you don&amp;#39;t find likely?) I think you misunderstood. In one post they said all accounts were banned including their recovery accounts. They also said they were forced to create a new account on a different service just to have email. In another comment they said Google sent them an email saying their accounts were banned for “child protection”. This supposedly occurred after…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47596941&quot; title=&quot;The mods of that subreddit appear to have come to the same conclusion. If you go into Reddit believing all of the posts by default and forgiving inconsistencies you’re going to be duped by a lot of fake stories. I think it’s interesting that someone posted a “my account just got busted for accidental CSAM” and nobody is concerned about the impending law enforcement consequences? Only about email access? If this really happened then it would be referred to law enforcement because companies don’t…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users suggest this serves as a warning to self-host or use offline backups &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47596174&quot; title=&quot;Where the hell is the open source app that downloads all your google stuff? There is a huge opportunity to be a hero.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47596636&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; All my emails, all my documents saved in Google Drive. I would think someone whose business depends on gmail would use an email client, at least periodically, to download their emails.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others maintain that even if this specific anecdote is &amp;#34;creative writing,&amp;#34; the underlying threat of being locked out of one&amp;#39;s digital life remains a valid concern &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47596804&quot; title=&quot;You identify two inconsistencies, neither of which appear to actually be inconsistent. (One is just the observation that multiple accounts were banned, which is not actually an inconsistency? Just something you don&amp;#39;t find likely?) It&amp;#39;s possible that this is real, it&amp;#39;s possible it&amp;#39;s made up, but I&amp;#39;m not seeing much more evidence in your armchair scepticism than in the asserted facts. Last week everyone on HN was telling me that social media must immediately be regulated because it&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47596893&quot; title=&quot;The story as OP tells it is that they appealed the ban, and the ban was upheld. Logically, they appealed the ban from an email address they had access to. I don&amp;#39;t know how you get from &amp;#39;all of their Google accounts were banned&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;they had no possible way to send and receive email whatsoever&amp;#39;. &amp;gt; These Reddit stories always get some people invested in the story before the inconsistencies show up. You have to read them with some skepticism. You can do enough mental gymnastics to convince…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ounapuu.ee/posts/2026/04/01/focus/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Improving my focus by giving up my big monitor&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ounapuu.ee)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47597159&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;184 points · 173 comments · by Fudgel&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Switching from a large ultrawide monitor to a single laptop screen can improve focus and intentionality by reducing multitasking distractions and lowering power consumption. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ounapuu.ee/posts/2026/04/01/focus/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Improving my focus by giving up my big monitor    URL Source: https://ounapuu.ee/posts/2026/04/01/focus/    Published Time: 2026-04-01T06:00:00+03:00    Markdown Content:  # Improving my focus by giving up my big monitor :: ./techtipsy    [./techtipsy](https://ounapuu.ee/)  *   [Posts](https://ounapuu.ee/posts)  *   [Tags](https://ounapuu.ee/tags)  *   [The Archive](https://ounapuu.ee/misc/archive)  *   [RSS ![Image 1: RSS](https://ounapuu.ee/rss.png)](https://ounapuu.ee/index.xml)    # [Improving my…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a tension between the physiological benefits of a narrow visual field, which can enhance focus &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47638928&quot; title=&quot;Guys, this is a well known and under utilized effect of human psycho physiology. Visually focusing on a single point, small object, or just small visual field (aka tunnel vision) increases mental focus. AFAIK it’s also one of the reasons we all get “glued” to smartphone screens. In this paper, more than 20 deg visual field for a screen and subject performance went down: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S01678...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628551&quot; title=&quot;This was my secret weapon for years. My coworkers could never understand my focus and productivity and were always surprised when I said that it was due to working from a tiny laptop screen, and no more.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, and the high cognitive load of &amp;#34;window juggling&amp;#34; on small screens &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47636620&quot; title=&quot;I spent decades completely happy with Cmd+Tab. Now I’m helping someone develop a trading system and I need to see several log files simultaneously, a broker GUI, and neovim. Once I realized that in order to answer a single question I needed to Cmd+Tab at least four times, often more, I added two monitors and it’s dramatically lowered my stress level. FYI, on older MacBooks you can’t add more than one extra screen, but if you get a DisplayLink dongle it works perfectly.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628377&quot; title=&quot;I learned this lesson a couple decades ago. Managing windows with OS idiosyncrasies becomes a task in itself. However, I&amp;#39;ve also learned recently it depends what you&amp;#39;re doing. Software development, I just want one single maximized window on a single laptop monitor. If I have a near-retina DPI monitor with 120hz+ (I can&amp;#39;t deal with low DPI fuzziness and low refresh all day) I&amp;#39;ll usually have a 3-4 window layout on a single monitor with the IDE taking up half the screen. There is a minor…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find that large monitors or multi-screen setups reduce stress by eliminating repetitive task-switching &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47636620&quot; title=&quot;I spent decades completely happy with Cmd+Tab. Now I’m helping someone develop a trading system and I need to see several log files simultaneously, a broker GUI, and neovim. Once I realized that in order to answer a single question I needed to Cmd+Tab at least four times, often more, I added two monitors and it’s dramatically lowered my stress level. FYI, on older MacBooks you can’t add more than one extra screen, but if you get a DisplayLink dongle it works perfectly.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628377&quot; title=&quot;I learned this lesson a couple decades ago. Managing windows with OS idiosyncrasies becomes a task in itself. However, I&amp;#39;ve also learned recently it depends what you&amp;#39;re doing. Software development, I just want one single maximized window on a single laptop monitor. If I have a near-retina DPI monitor with 120hz+ (I can&amp;#39;t deal with low DPI fuzziness and low refresh all day) I&amp;#39;ll usually have a 3-4 window layout on a single monitor with the IDE taking up half the screen. There is a minor…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that these setups introduce organizational overhead and &amp;#34;hostile&amp;#34; OS distractions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47636661&quot; title=&quot;The reason I love my old cheap 1080p monitors so much is because they need less organizational overhead compared to a large 4k monitor where you constantly have to fix UI scaling bugs and zoom in/out, force different fonts for shitty web pages etc. I am never gonna sway away from i3 [1], a notification free tiled window desktop system is just way too convenient. When I have to bootup a Windows VM for work (I am a malware analyst most of the time) I am losing my mind with all the notifications…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47597274&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been a laptop purist most of my life, and prefer to work outside my house / office. Only recently I got a Big Monitor™ for a mini pc. It&amp;#39;s really messed with my head. Now when I look at my 15&amp;#39; laptop everything looks incredibly small. Not just that, but the scroll direction is opposite on the pc, so if I&amp;#39;m working side by side I find myself accidentally scrolling each one backwards, or actually typing into the wrong keyboard. Somehow I survived this long with just laptop screens and I…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Proposed solutions for managing this complexity include tiling window managers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628484&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Managing windows with OS idiosyncrasies becomes a task in itself. Tiling window managers are a good solution.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, though critics note these come with their own set of idiosyncrasies and cognitive demands &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628620&quot; title=&quot;Tiling merely changes the idiosyncrasies, and I say this as someone who primarily uses them. (hyprland in my case) If you created a window right now, where will it go? Which window will it take its space from? Does it use your focused window? Your mouse position? If your WM supports mixed floating &amp;amp; tiling, how does it go when you flip a window between them? etc. That&amp;#39;s all cognitive load when you aren&amp;#39;t familiar and still requires some hand control when you are.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://isbgpsafeyet.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Is BGP safe yet?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (isbgpsafeyet.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47600382&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;254 points · 89 comments · by janandonly&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudflare reports that the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) remains insecure, though many major ISPs are increasingly adopting the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) security framework to prevent internet disruptions and malicious route hijacking. &lt;a href=&quot;https://isbgpsafeyet.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Is BGP safe yet? · Cloudflare    URL Source: https://isbgpsafeyet.com/    Markdown Content:  # Is BGP safe yet? · Cloudflare    # Is BGP safe yet? _No._    [Border Gateway Protocol (BGP)](https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/security/glossary/what-is-bgp/) is the postal service of the Internet. It’s responsible for looking at all of the available paths that data could travel and picking the best route.    Unfortunately, it isn’t secure, and there have been some [major Internet…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While RPKI improves BGP security by verifying prefix ownership, users note it remains incomplete because it does not secure the routing path, leaving the system vulnerable to attackers who claim to be on a path to a victim &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47601086&quot; title=&quot;RPKI doesn&amp;#39;t make BGP safe, it makes it safer . BGP hijacks can still happen. RPKI only secures the ownership information of a given prefix, not the path to that prefix. Under RPKI, an attacker can still claim to be on the path to a victim AS, and get the victim&amp;#39;s traffic sent to it. The solution to this was supposed to be BGPSec, but it&amp;#39;s widely seen as un-deployable.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Some argue that existing protections like TLS are &amp;#34;good enough&amp;#34; to prevent data spoofing even if a hijack occurs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47601014&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; A BGP hijack occurs when a malicious node deceives another node, lying about what the routes are for its neighbors. Without any security protocols, this misinformation can propagate from node to node, until a large number of nodes now know about, and attempt to use these incorrect, nonexistent, or malicious routes. But with HTTPS, they wouldn&amp;#39;t be able to actually pose as another website, just delay/black hole the request so it doesn&amp;#39;t reach its goal target, right? From the figure, it makes…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47604558&quot; title=&quot;I think RPKI is good enough. As we have TLS on top it doesn&amp;#39;t need to be perfect.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, though others point to inconsistent ISP implementation and data discrepancies in current safety tests &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47600632&quot; title=&quot;This actually shows pretty good coverage for this feature, it seems to me. The big American isps do it, the mobile ones do too... How many major isps would we want to implement it to be &amp;#39;safe&amp;#39; and what would that look like? Is this a regional thing? They&amp;#39;ve only listed 4 unsafe ones on the site and that doesn&amp;#39;t seem like a major issue, but maybe they&amp;#39;re very large somewhere.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47600723&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m on sky in the UK which is marked as not safe due to no RPKI. It&amp;#39;s not on the list so imagine there is a fair few missing, would be neat to have a table you could filter by country, provider type (cloud/isp etc) based on real results from users. edit: there&amp;#39;s a show all button to expand the table&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47601623&quot; title=&quot;I got a fail on T-Mobile USA. It seems in the full list that T-Mobile is listed as both passing and failing.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant debate exists over SCION as a potential successor: proponents highlight its adoption by the Swiss financial sector &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47601777&quot; title=&quot;Hmm, I&amp;#39;d disagree. The fact that Anapaya Systems (the for profit company mentioned) has the only commercial implementation/adjacent software is a problem, yes. But &amp;#39;snake oil&amp;#39; doesn&amp;#39;t quite match up with the fact that SCION right now provides the backbone for the Swiss financial network moving 200 billion CHF each day [1], so at least some level of workable technology has to be there. And for no one to be taking it seriously, there&amp;#39;s a decently long list of multinational ISPs at the very least…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, while critics dismiss it as &amp;#34;snake oil&amp;#34; due to its lack of hardware support and perceived commercial baggage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47600772&quot; title=&quot;I think the test for BGP is Safe is when we stop using it and instead use SCION: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCION_(Internet_architecture) .&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47601172&quot; title=&quot;SCION is generally considered snake oil within the network operator community. Its weird single vendor for profit company that ships it&amp;#39;s software, the fact that no router hw asic fwding supports what they want to do and then the general scummy inclusion of block chain / crypto as well as some &amp;#39;green washing&amp;#39; for PR hype. Sure the swiss have their toy but no one is taking it seriously.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://engineering.fb.com/2026/03/30/data-center-engineering/ai-for-american-produced-cement-and-concrete/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI for American-produced cement and concrete&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (engineering.fb.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47603737&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;223 points · 117 comments · by latchkey&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meta has released BOxCrete, an open-source AI model designed to help the construction industry rapidly develop high-quality, sustainable concrete mixes using materials produced in the United States. &lt;a href=&quot;https://engineering.fb.com/2026/03/30/data-center-engineering/ai-for-american-produced-cement-and-concrete/&quot; title=&quot;Title: AI for American-Produced Cement and Concrete    URL Source: https://engineering.fb.com/2026/03/30/data-center-engineering/ai-for-american-produced-cement-and-concrete/    Published Time: 2026-03-30T16:00:34+00:00    Markdown Content:  # AI for American-Produced Cement and Concrete - Engineering at Meta    [Skip to content](https://engineering.fb.com/2026/03/30/data-center-engineering/ai-for-american-produced-cement-and-concrete/#content)    # [![Image 1: Engineering at…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether AI is best applied to concrete formulation or on-site quality control, with some arguing that machine learning can efficiently narrow down candidate mixes for long-term curing tests &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47604109&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; As a result, producers need a way to rapidly explore and validate new formulations without spending months in the lab. How do you bypass the normal process of pouring test articles and testing them months and years after cure? This is fundamentally a research activity that needs to conduct verifiable science. Not something you can guess at with an LLM.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47604417&quot; title=&quot;Somebody needs to coin a new term for the scattershot zero-thought AI griping that is pervasive in online comments these days. Meatslop? Obviously it&amp;#39;s going to be more productive for a manufacturer to do a years-long curing test on 100 likely candidates instead of 100 random mixes. They obviously already screen candidates through traditional methods, but if this AI technique improves accuracy, all the better.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics contend that the industry&amp;#39;s primary issues stem from &amp;#34;terroir&amp;#34;—regional variations in raw materials like sand and gravel—and human error during mixing, which might be better addressed by improved portable testing sensors or volumetric mixing trucks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47604424&quot; title=&quot;Hand-held devices for testing concrete properties would be more useful. Most concrete problems come from a bad mix - too much water, not enough cement, etc. Concrete testing usually involves cutting a core out of the poured slab and sending it to a lab. Something where you stick a probe in the mix and can reject it before pouring would help. Here are some on-site concrete testers.[1] They&amp;#39;re heavy and a pain to use. There should be an app for this. But that&amp;#39;s so last-decade. [1]…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47604198&quot; title=&quot;Tangentially related, but there is a new generation of trucks that mix the concrete on-site.  They can output small batches and change the mix on the fly.  They solve a lot of headaches! https://cementech.com/volumetric-technology/&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47605514&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; too much water, not enough cement, etc. I wanted to mention that Concrete is far more complex and regional than folks might imagine.  The quality of gravel and sand, local impurities - these all contribute massively.  It&amp;#39;s probably best to think of it like a wine&amp;#39;s terroir - except, unlike a bottle of wine, it&amp;#39;s prohibitively expensive to ship both the components and the finalized mixture to different areas.  If a region&amp;#39;s limestone has a massive clay impurity then it may simply be unsuitable…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant debate regarding &amp;#34;AI hype,&amp;#34; with some users suggesting that the term &amp;#34;machine learning&amp;#34; would be more accurate and less likely to trigger the reflexive skepticism currently pervasive in tech circles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47604417&quot; title=&quot;Somebody needs to coin a new term for the scattershot zero-thought AI griping that is pervasive in online comments these days. Meatslop? Obviously it&amp;#39;s going to be more productive for a manufacturer to do a years-long curing test on 100 likely candidates instead of 100 random mixes. They obviously already screen candidates through traditional methods, but if this AI technique improves accuracy, all the better.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47605120&quot; title=&quot;The current strategy of the AI hype machine is to exhaust people&amp;#39;s reserves of attention by presenting a never-ending stream of hard-to-verify &amp;#39;positive&amp;#39; claims. It&amp;#39;s Gish Gallop done on the Internet scale with a never-ending parade of tech influencers, proxy &amp;#39;journalists&amp;#39; and low-value accounts. The whole strategy aims for saturation and demoralized acceptance. It&amp;#39;s no surprise that people readjust their immediate reactions by expressing hostility and skepticism about anything AI-related…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.atomic.computer/blog/white-house-app-network-traffic-analysis/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;We intercepted the White House app&amp;#39;s network traffic&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (atomic.computer)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595865&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;234 points · 72 comments · by donutpepperoni&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A network analysis of the White House iOS app revealed that 77% of its traffic goes to third-party services like OneSignal and Google, transmitting sensitive user metadata and tracking cookies despite a privacy manifest claiming no data is collected. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.atomic.computer/blog/white-house-app-network-traffic-analysis/&quot; title=&quot;Title: We Intercepted the White House App&amp;#39;s Network Traffic. Here&amp;#39;s What It Sends.    URL Source: https://www.atomic.computer/blog/white-house-app-network-traffic-analysis/    Published Time: 2026-03-30T17:00:00-05:00    Markdown Content:  # We Intercepted the White House App&amp;#39;s Network Traffic. Here&amp;#39;s What It Sends. | atomic.computer  [Skip to content](https://www.atomic.computer/blog/white-house-app-network-traffic-analysis/#main)    [![Image 1:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some commenters argue that the White House app’s heavy reliance on third-party domains is standard for modern &amp;#34;mass market&amp;#34; B2C applications &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47596079&quot; title=&quot;So like... most b2c apps out there? I checked app privacy report for a few such apps I have installed and also got a very high proportion of third party domains. Maybe not as high as 77% but definitely above 50% (ie. more domains are third party than first party). The most surprising part here is them refusing to put correct info in the &amp;#39;data collected&amp;#39; section of the app store listing. edit: they seemed to have updated the store listing, so the &amp;#39;data collected&amp;#39; section is correct.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47596187&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m sure that HN&amp;#39;s preferred app would be &amp;lt;5MB, and has zero third party SDKs or telemetry, but half a dozen SDKs and third party domains is basically most mass market apps these days. Is it bad? Yes, but the whitehouse isn&amp;#39;t being egregiously bad, but &amp;#39;whitehouse app is bad, just like most other apps&amp;#39; isn&amp;#39;t going to get clicks.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that government software must be held to a significantly higher security and privacy standard &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47596109&quot; title=&quot;A government app being built like b2c is exactly the problem&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47596714&quot; title=&quot;Government apps should absolutely be held to a higher standard than consumer B2C apps. Loading Google Fonts is one thing — sending telemetry to OneSignal and Facebook from an official government app is a different conversation entirely. In Australia, apps handling government data must comply with the PSPF (Protective Security Policy Framework) and the ISM, which explicitly restrict data flows to untrusted third parties. A government app routing 77% of requests externally would fail an IRAP…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47596190&quot; title=&quot;No one put words in your mouth, they asked you a question. You are the one who made the initial comparison to B2C apps, so it seems like a fair question to me. Your comment implies that its standard and the app isn&amp;#39;t doing anything out of the ordinary when I think most people would except an official government app to be held to a higher standard than the average B2C app.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics point out that while loading Google Fonts is relatively &amp;#34;boring,&amp;#34; sending telemetry to Facebook and OneSignal from an official government platform represents a failure in oversight and data exfiltration prevention &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47596653&quot; title=&quot;43% (of the 158 3rd-party requests) is... google. youtube, fonts, and analytics. 55% if you include facebook and twitter. a government app shouldnt have crazy analytics and tracking and whatever. but i dont think loading google fonts or embedding youtube videos is really all that wild in the grand scheme of things. given the title, i was half expecting some sort of egregious list with, like, palantir and some ICE domains or something. i dont like the app, but google? facebook? that is pretty…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47596714&quot; title=&quot;Government apps should absolutely be held to a higher standard than consumer B2C apps. Loading Google Fonts is one thing — sending telemetry to OneSignal and Facebook from an official government app is a different conversation entirely. In Australia, apps handling government data must comply with the PSPF (Protective Security Policy Framework) and the ISM, which explicitly restrict data flows to untrusted third parties. A government app routing 77% of requests externally would fail an IRAP…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the technical ease of intercepting this traffic on iOS sparked a discussion on the importance of device control and the right to inspect where personal data is being sent &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47596559&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; We installed mitmproxy on a Mac, configured an iPhone to route traffic through it, and installed the mitmproxy CA certificate on the device. &amp;gt; All HTTPS traffic was decrypted and logged. No modifications were made to the traffic. The app was used as any normal user would use it. Is it really that simple to inspect network traffic on an iPhone, namely to get it to trust the user-installed cert? I do quite a bit of network inspection on Android and I find it to be painful, even if the apps…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://defenceleaders.com/news/ukrainian-combat-robot-holds-frontline-position-for-six-weeks-in-sign-of-growing-ugv-maturity/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ukrainian drone holds position for 6 weeks&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (defenceleaders.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47604245&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;141 points · &lt;strong&gt;160 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by AftHurrahWinch&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Ukrainian TW 12.7 unmanned ground vehicle successfully held a contested frontline position for six weeks, using a machine gun and day-night optics to suppress Russian movements. The mission demonstrates the growing maturity and reliability of domestic robotic systems in replacing infantry teams in high-risk zones. &lt;a href=&quot;https://defenceleaders.com/news/ukrainian-combat-robot-holds-frontline-position-for-six-weeks-in-sign-of-growing-ugv-maturity/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Ukrainian Combat Robot Holds Frontline Position for Six Weeks in Sign of Growing UGV Maturity    URL Source: https://defenceleaders.com/news/ukrainian-combat-robot-holds-frontline-position-for-six-weeks-in-sign-of-growing-ugv-maturity/    Published Time: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 04:48:08 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Ukrainian Drone Holds Position for 6 Weeks    [![Image 2: Defence Leaders…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether the rise of drone warfare will eventually abstract conflict into a &amp;#34;video game&amp;#34; of economic and manufacturing attrition where human casualties are minimized &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47606085&quot; title=&quot;At this point might as well just play strategy video game and call it a day? Both sides staring at screens, controlling drones fighting each other.. why use physical drones at all? abstract it away and play video game? In the near future, war might be about who can build faster/better and hit the other economy more effectively, and those who can&amp;#39;t produce any more drones, lose. If you think about, we moved human one-on-one battles to MMA and combat sport, this allowed channeling individual…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47606310&quot; title=&quot;Yes, but it not like before. We (as humans) are getting more strict about losing people&amp;#39;s life. We don&amp;#39;t allow genocide, we don&amp;#39;t allow colonization and enslavement, at least the majority of nations agree that this is not acceptable. So it is NOT like before. And the logical conclusion, as those drones get better and more widely adopted, is that war will be nothing more a video game with real economics and supply chain. So we basically made the cost of genocide or colonization too high to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that global intolerance for genocide and colonization will force wars to become purely technological and economic contests &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47606310&quot; title=&quot;Yes, but it not like before. We (as humans) are getting more strict about losing people&amp;#39;s life. We don&amp;#39;t allow genocide, we don&amp;#39;t allow colonization and enslavement, at least the majority of nations agree that this is not acceptable. So it is NOT like before. And the logical conclusion, as those drones get better and more widely adopted, is that war will be nothing more a video game with real economics and supply chain. So we basically made the cost of genocide or colonization too high to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47607456&quot; title=&quot;Regarding your commend on energy, I think it is actually an argument on my point that fighting wars is going to be even more absurd. If the world is running short of energy then fighting a war that further consumes energy without clear win will be viewed as absurd. If all wars will become a war of attrition between robots and economies, then fighting wars means no energy left for local economies to run across the globe. The future war will feel like bleeding, a leak in an already scarce system,…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others dismiss this as a &amp;#34;disconnection from reality,&amp;#34; noting that war is driven by human nature and that actual genocides continue to occur today &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47606139&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; abstract it away and play video game? What happens when one side wins? In the real world, they actually win. In the video game, nothing happens &amp;gt; In the near future, war might be about who can build faster/better and hit the other economy more effectively In other words, in the near future it might work the exact way it has always worked. &amp;gt; they could easily kill the people, but other nations won&amp;#39;t allow it, so it will stop at economical defeat. Your ideas are based on the idea of winning in…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47606658&quot; title=&quot;I think people are downvoting you because your post displays extreme disconnection from reality. I will believe that it is possible to “fix” war immediately after we “fix” poverty, extreme inequality, hunger, deaths of despair, and crime, any of which should be immensely easier to solve than war. There are multiple genocides happening today .&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47607240&quot; title=&quot;What system I would rather have is irrelevant. What system you would rather have is irrelevant. The system that we have, and the systems we will have in the future, are emergent properties of human nature mixed with economic reality (energy/resource availability vs regional economic needs). Voting will not change it, nor will revolution. You’re welcome to try, but I will no longer waste my time on it. I have studied it for years and I don’t believe it can be changed short of an energy…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, the debate highlights a rift between the vision of war as a controlled &amp;#34;combat sport&amp;#34; of resources and the grim reality that victory in war traditionally requires physical destruction and human loss &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47606085&quot; title=&quot;At this point might as well just play strategy video game and call it a day? Both sides staring at screens, controlling drones fighting each other.. why use physical drones at all? abstract it away and play video game? In the near future, war might be about who can build faster/better and hit the other economy more effectively, and those who can&amp;#39;t produce any more drones, lose. If you think about, we moved human one-on-one battles to MMA and combat sport, this allowed channeling individual…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47606139&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; abstract it away and play video game? What happens when one side wins? In the real world, they actually win. In the video game, nothing happens &amp;gt; In the near future, war might be about who can build faster/better and hit the other economy more effectively In other words, in the near future it might work the exact way it has always worked. &amp;gt; they could easily kill the people, but other nations won&amp;#39;t allow it, so it will stop at economical defeat. Your ideas are based on the idea of winning in…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47606551&quot; title=&quot;You either agree or disagree with the idea of genocide. And if you disagree with idea of genocide, then this is becoming closer to video games as more drones are deployed which is my thesis. But if you agree with the idea of genocide, then yes, wars can be won by total elimination (or major reduction) in the other people&amp;#39;s population and loss of life. So do you think genocide is acceptable in war or not?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-IPv6-IPv4-Legacy-Knobs&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;New patches allow building Linux IPv6-only&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (phoronix.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47600434&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;115 points · &lt;strong&gt;165 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by Bender&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Linux developer David Woodhouse has proposed a patch series that introduces a build option to disable IPv4 support, allowing the kernel to be compiled for IPv6-only environments while marking &amp;#34;legacy&amp;#34; IP for potential deprecation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-IPv6-IPv4-Legacy-Knobs&quot; title=&quot;New Patches Allow Building Linux IPv6-Only, Option To Deprecate &amp;#39;Legacy&amp;#39; IPv4    Longtime Linux developer David Woodhouse sent out a patch series today to &amp;#39;deprecate legacy IP&amp;#39; support within the Linux kernel    [![Phoronix](/phxcms7-css/phoronix.png)](/)    * [Articles &amp;amp; Reviews](/reviews)  * [News Archive](/news)  * [Forums](/forums/)  * [Premium Ad-Free](/phoronix-premium)  * [Contact](/contact)  * Popular Categories  * Close    * [Articles &amp;amp; Reviews](/reviews)  * [News Archive](/news)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The introduction of IPv6-only Linux builds has sparked debate between proponents who view global addressability as a return to the internet&amp;#39;s original peer-to-peer vision &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47601138&quot; title=&quot;As it should. Date notwithstanding, I would actually enjoy if there was a manually induced latency penalty for &amp;#39;legacy IP&amp;#39; that needs to be manually turned off on Linux. I know some people don&amp;#39;t care at all, but the internet was made to be addressable. IPv6 is the only shot we have to go back to that.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47602474&quot; title=&quot;Why don&amp;#39;t you want every device to have a public IP? There seems to be a perception that this is somehow insecure, but the default configuration of any router is to firewall everything. And one small bonus of the huge size of a /64 is that port scanning is not feasible, unlike in the old days when you could trivially scan a whole IPv4 /24 of a company that forgot to configure their firewall. NAT may work fine for your setup, but it can be a huge headache for some users, especially users on…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; and critics who prefer the perceived security and privacy of NAT &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47601672&quot; title=&quot;- I don&amp;#39;t want my interfaces to have multiple IP addresses - I don&amp;#39;t want my devices to have public, discoverable IPs - I like NAT and it works fine - I don&amp;#39;t want to use dynamic DNS just so I have set up a single home server without my ISP rotating my /64 for no reason (and no SLAAC is not an answer because I don&amp;#39;t want multiple addresses per interface) - I don&amp;#39;t need an entire /48 for my home network IPv6 won&amp;#39;t help the internet &amp;#39;be addressable.&amp;#39; Almost everyone is moving towards centralized…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47602603&quot; title=&quot;I don’t want some of my devices to be publicly addressable at all, even if I mess up something at the firewall while updating the rules. NAT provides this by default. I don’t want a static address either (although static addresses should be freely available to those who want them). Having a rotating IP provides a small privacy benefit. People who have upset other people during an online gaming session will understand; revenge DDoS is not unheard of in the gaming world.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users worry that public IPs increase vulnerability and simplify corporate surveillance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47602665&quot; title=&quot;Great question and my gut is that it makes it that much easier for large, perhaps corporate interests to gain surveillance and control. I&amp;#39;m aware it&amp;#39;s possible now, but it really feels like there&amp;#39;s some safety in the friction of the possibility that my home devices just switch up IP addresses once in a while. Like, wouldn&amp;#39;t e.g. IPv6 theoretically make &amp;#39;ISP&amp;#39;s charging per device in your home&amp;#39; easier, if only a little bit? I know they COULD just do MAC addresses, but still.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47602058&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Having a public address doesn&amp;#39;t worry me. At home I have a firewall at the edge. It is set to block everything incoming. Concern is privacy, not security. Publicly addressable machine is a bit worse for security (IoT anyone?), but it is a lot worse for privacy.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that modern firewalls and IPv6 privacy extensions effectively mitigate these risks while eliminating the &amp;#34;headache&amp;#34; of NAT workarounds for gaming and VoIP &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47602474&quot; title=&quot;Why don&amp;#39;t you want every device to have a public IP? There seems to be a perception that this is somehow insecure, but the default configuration of any router is to firewall everything. And one small bonus of the huge size of a /64 is that port scanning is not feasible, unlike in the old days when you could trivially scan a whole IPv4 /24 of a company that forgot to configure their firewall. NAT may work fine for your setup, but it can be a huge headache for some users, especially users on…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47601878&quot; title=&quot;I recently changed ISPs and have IPv6 for the first time.  I mostly felt the same way, but have learned to get over it.  Some things took some getting used to. An &amp;#39;ip address show&amp;#39; is messy with so many addresses. Those public IPs are randomized on most devices, so one is created and more static but goes mostly unused.  The randomly generated IPs aren&amp;#39;t useful inbound for long.  I don&amp;#39;t think you could brute force scan that kind of address space, and the address used to connect to the Internet…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47603246&quot; title=&quot;You can&amp;#39;t correlate the number of addresses with the number of devices because IPv6 temporary addresses exist. If you enable temporary addresses, your computer will periodically randomly generate a new address and switch to it. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8981.html&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant friction remains regarding the &amp;#34;type-ability&amp;#34; of long IPv6 addresses compared to IPv4 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47602839&quot; title=&quot;The main thing I don&amp;#39;t like is type-ability. Even now I type in 192.168.1.14 to connect to my mates computer to play satisfactory. No way in heck am I trying in an ip6!&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, though proponents suggest that functional mDNS and local DNS should render manual IP entry obsolete &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47604041&quot; title=&quot;Why not just type in &amp;#39;mates-pc&amp;#39; and have functional mDNS and not have to memorize a bunch of numbers? Why not just expect your OS&amp;#39;s DNS setup to actually just work?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-03-31</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-03-31</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/Fried_rice/status/2038894956459290963&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Claude Code&amp;#39;s source code has been leaked via a map file in their NPM registry&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47584540&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2086 points&lt;/strong&gt; · &lt;strong&gt;1020 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by treexs&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The source code for Claude Code was reportedly leaked after a source map file was inadvertently included in its NPM registry package. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/Fried_rice/status/2038894956459290963&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;Fried_rice&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2038894956459290963&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;Fried_rice&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2038894956459290963&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Related ongoing thread: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;The Claude Code Source Leak: fake tools, frustration regexes, undercover mode&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47586778&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47586778&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The leak, likely caused by a Bun build bug &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47588317&quot; title=&quot;I think this is ultimately caused by a Bun bug which I reported, which means source maps are exposed in production: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/issues/28001 Claude code uses (and Anthropic owns) Bun, so my guess is they&amp;#39;re doing a production build, expecting it not to output source maps, but it is.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, revealed a codebase that many users found surprisingly messy, highlighted by a single 3,167-line function with extreme cyclomatic complexity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47585511&quot; title=&quot;src/cli/print.ts This is the single worst function in the codebase by every metric: - 3,167 lines long (the file itself is 5,594 lines)    - 12 levels of nesting at its deepest    - ~486 branch points of cyclomatic complexity    - 12 parameters + an options object with 16 sub-properties    - Defines 21 inner functions and closures    - Handles: agent run loop, SIGINT, rate-limits, AWS auth, MCP lifecycle, plugin install/refresh, worktree bridging, team-lead polling (while(true) inside), control…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47584709&quot; title=&quot;The code looks, at a glance, as bad as you expect.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Key discoveries include a regex-based sentiment analysis tool for logging negative user prompts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47585326&quot; title=&quot;They have an interesting regex for detecting negative sentiment in users prompt which is then logged (explicit content): https://github.com/chatgptprojects/claude-code/blob/642c7f94... I guess these words are to be avoided...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47585535&quot; title=&quot;An LLM company using regexes for sentiment analysis? That&amp;#39;s like a truck company using horses to transport parts. Weird choice.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; and an &amp;#34;undercover mode&amp;#34; designed to mimic human behavior &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47585596&quot; title=&quot;Undercover mode also pretends to be human, which I&amp;#39;m less ok with: https://github.com/chatgptprojects/claude-code/blob/642c7f94...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47585733&quot; title=&quot;You&amp;#39;ll never win this battle, so why waste feelings and energy on it?  That&amp;#39;s where the internet is headed.  There&amp;#39;s no magical human verification technology coming to save us.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the code contains an &amp;#34;anti-distillation&amp;#34; defense that poisons API traffic with fake tool definitions to prevent competitors from training on Claude’s outputs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47585239&quot; title=&quot;ANTI_DISTILLATION_CC            This is Anthropic&amp;#39;s anti-distillation defence baked into Claude Code. When enabled, it injects anti_distillation: [&amp;#39;fake_tools&amp;#39;] into every API request, which causes the server to silently slip decoy tool definitions into the model&amp;#39;s system prompt. The goal: if someone is scraping Claude Code&amp;#39;s API traffic to train a competing model, the poisoned training data makes that distillation attempt less useful.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47586633&quot; title=&quot;Paranoia. And also ironic considering their base LLM is a distillation of the web and books etc etc.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.stepsecurity.io/blog/axios-compromised-on-npm-malicious-versions-drop-remote-access-trojan&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Axios compromised on NPM – Malicious versions drop remote access trojan&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (stepsecurity.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47582220&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1930 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 808 comments · by mtud&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A compromised maintainer account was used to publish malicious versions of the popular **axios** library (1.14.1 and 0.30.4) to npm, injecting a hidden dependency that deploys a cross-platform remote access trojan (RAT) on Windows, macOS, and Linux systems. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.stepsecurity.io/blog/axios-compromised-on-npm-malicious-versions-drop-remote-access-trojan&quot; title=&quot;Title: axios Compromised on npm - Malicious Versions Drop Remote Access Trojan - StepSecurity    URL Source: https://www.stepsecurity.io/blog/axios-compromised-on-npm-malicious-versions-drop-remote-access-trojan    Published Time: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 18:51:47 GMT    Markdown Content:  # axios Compromised on npm - Malicious Versions Drop Remote Access Trojan - StepSecurity    [Skip to main content](https://www.stepsecurity.io/#main)    [](https://www.stepsecurity.io/)    *     Solutions          *   [GitHub…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The compromise of Axios has reignited debates over the security of the JavaScript ecosystem, with users highlighting that the attack relied on a malicious `postinstall` script in a fake dependency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47582484&quot; title=&quot;I can&amp;#39;t even imagine the scale of the impact with Axios being compromised, nearly every other project uses it for some reason instead of fetch (I never understood why). Also from the report: &amp;gt; Neither malicious version contains a single line of malicious code inside axios itself. Instead, both inject a fake dependency, plain-crypto-js@4.2.1, a package that is never imported anywhere in the axios source, whose only purpose is to run a postinstall script that deploys a cross-platform remote…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. To mitigate such risks, many recommend configuring package managers to ignore scripts and enforce a &amp;#34;minimum release age&amp;#34; for updates, though critics note this may simply delay the activation of dormant malware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47582632&quot; title=&quot;PSA: npm/bun/pnpm/uv now all support setting a minimum release age for packages. I also have `ignore-scripts=true` in my ~/.npmrc. Based on the analysis, that alone would have mitigated the vulnerability. bun and pnpm do not execute lifecycle scripts by default. Here&amp;#39;s how to set global configs to set min release age to 7 days: ~/.config/uv/uv.toml    exclude-newer = &amp;#39;7 days&amp;#39;      ~/.npmrc    min-release-age=7 # days    ignore-scripts=true        ~/Library/Preferences/pnpm/rc   …&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47582818&quot; title=&quot;If everyone avoids using packages released within the last 7 days, malicious code is more likely to remain dormant for 7 days.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong consensus favoring &amp;#34;batteries included&amp;#34; standard libraries or single-file C libraries to reduce the massive attack surface created by transitive dependencies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47584459&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Batteries included&amp;#39; ecosystems are the only persistent solution to the package manager problem. If your first party tooling contains all the functionality you typically need, it&amp;#39;s possible you can be productive with zero 3rd party dependencies. In practice you will tend to have a few, but you won&amp;#39;t be vendoring out critical things like HTTP, TCP, JSON, string sanitation, cryptography. These are beacons for attackers. Everything depends on this stuff so the motivation for attacking these common…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47583251&quot; title=&quot;Package managers are a failed experiment. We have libraries like SQLite, which is a single .c file that you drag into your project and it immediately does a ton of incredibly useful, non-trivial work for you, while barely increasing your executable&amp;#39;s size. The issue is not dependencies themselves, it&amp;#39;s transitive ones. Nobody installs left-pad or is-even-number directly, and &amp;#39;libraries&amp;#39; like these are the vast majority of the attack surface. If you get rid of transitive dependencies, you get…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47582834&quot; title=&quot;Not to beat a dead horse but I see this again and again with dependencies. Each time I get more worried that the same will happen with rust. I understand the fat std library approach won’t work but I really still want a good solution where I can trust packages to be safe and high quality.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alex000kim.com/posts/2026-03-31-claude-code-source-leak/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Claude Code Source Leak: fake tools, frustration regexes, undercover mode&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (alex000kim.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47586778&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1369 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 572 comments · by alex000kim&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The source code for Claude Code was leaked via a map file in its NPM registry, revealing internal details such as &amp;#34;undercover mode,&amp;#34; regexes for handling user frustration, and placeholder tools. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alex000kim.com/posts/2026-03-31-claude-code-source-leak/&quot; title=&quot;Related ongoing thread: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Claude Code&amp;amp;#x27;s source code has been leaked via a map file in their NPM registry&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47584540&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47584540&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Also related: &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.ccleaks.com&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.ccleaks.com&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The leak of Claude Code&amp;#39;s internal prompts has sparked a debate over &amp;#34;undercover mode,&amp;#34; which instructs the AI to omit mentions of its identity and write commit messages &amp;#34;as a human developer would&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47591989&quot; title=&quot;There are now several comments that (incorrectly?) interpret the undercover mode as only hiding internal information. Excerpts from the actual prompt[0]: NEVER include in commit messages or PR descriptions:    - The phrase &amp;#39;Claude Code&amp;#39; or any mention that you are an AI    - Co-Authored-By lines or any other attribution      BAD (never write these):    - 1-shotted by claude-opus-4-6    - Generated with Claude Code    - Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 &amp;lt;…&amp;gt; This very much sounds like it does what it says…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47591738&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; my first knee-jerk reaction wouldn&amp;#39;t be &amp;#39;this is for pretending to be human&amp;#39;... &amp;#39;Write commit messages as a human developer would — describe only what the code  change does.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users view this as a deceptive attempt to bypass anti-AI sentiment or legal concerns regarding copyright and accountability, others argue it is a practical measure to keep git histories clean of &amp;#34;Bill of Tools&amp;#34; noise &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47593501&quot; title=&quot;I cringe every time I see Claude trying to co-author a commit. The git history is expected to track accountability and ownership, not your Bill of Tools. Should I also co-author my PRs with my linter, intellisense and IDE?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47593988&quot; title=&quot;A whole lot of people find LLM code to be strictly objectionable, for a variety of reasons.   We can debate the validity of those reasons, but I think that even if those reasons were all invalid, it would still be unethical to deceive people by a deliberate lie of omission.  I don&amp;#39;t turn it off, and I don&amp;#39;t think other people should either.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594044&quot; title=&quot;You have copyright to a commit authored by you. You (almost certainly) don&amp;#39;t have copyright (nobody has) to a commit authored by Claude.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47591499&quot; title=&quot;Undercover mode is the most concerning part here tbh.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the leak revealed that Anthropic developers are using detailed code comments to store operational data and business context, a practice described as both a &amp;#34;hack&amp;#34; for guiding AI agents and a &amp;#34;YOLO&amp;#34; approach that inadvertently exposes trade secrets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47591890&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m amazed at how much of what my past employers would call trade secrets are just being shipped in the source. Including comments that just plainly state the whole business backstory of certain decisions. It&amp;#39;s like they discarded all release harnesses and project tracking and just YOLO&amp;#39;d everything into the codebase itself. Edit: Everyone is responding &amp;#39;comments are good&amp;#39; and I can&amp;#39;t tell if any of you actually read TFA or not &amp;gt; “BQ 2026-03-10: 1,279 sessions had 50+ consecutive failures (up…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47591992&quot; title=&quot;Comments are the ultimate agent coding hack.  If you&amp;#39;re not using comments, you&amp;#39;re doing agent coding wrong. Why?  Agents may or may not read docs.  It may or may not use skills or tools.  It will always read comments &amp;#39;in the line of sight&amp;#39; of the task. You get free long term agent memory with zero infrastructure.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://responsiblestatecraft.org/iran-strait-of-hormuz/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why the US Navy won&amp;#39;t blast the Iranians and &amp;#39;open&amp;#39; Strait of Hormuz&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (responsiblestatecraft.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47584795&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;465 points · &lt;strong&gt;1443 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by KoftaBob&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The U.S. Navy is avoiding a direct confrontation to reopen the Strait of Hormuz because Iran’s inexpensive anti-ship missiles and drones pose an asymmetric, high-risk threat to costly American aircraft carriers, signaling a shift away from traditional Western naval dominance near well-defended shorelines. &lt;a href=&quot;https://responsiblestatecraft.org/iran-strait-of-hormuz/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Why the US Navy won&amp;#39;t blast the Iranians and &amp;#39;open&amp;#39; Strait of Hormuz    URL Source: https://responsiblestatecraft.org/iran-strait-of-hormuz/    Published Time: 2026-03-31T04:05:02Z    Markdown Content:  # Why the US Navy won&amp;#39;t blast the Iranians and &amp;#39;open&amp;#39; Strait of Hormuz | Responsible Statecraft    [](https://x.com/@RStatecraft)[](https://www.facebook.com/RStatecraft/)[](https://flipboard.com/@RStatecraft)    [![Image 1: Responsible…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether the U.S. Navy remains capable of securing the Strait of Hormuz, with some arguing that aircraft carriers have become expensive liabilities vulnerable to low-cost drones and missiles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594796&quot; title=&quot;The title should change &amp;#39;won&amp;#39;t&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;shouldn&amp;#39;t&amp;#39;. This administration doesn&amp;#39;t do things because of deep understanding, it does them because of gut reaction. The US Military could, at an unknown cost, just blast away. This article points out, rightfully, how scared we are to put our weapons in harms way because of how expensive they are. I made this argument many times to friends years ago. From a military strategic point of view we should be developing drone/cruise missile carriers (and upping…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594364&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;The era of carrier-dominated airpower is fading, as cheap, unmanned anti-ship weapons reshape naval warfare, whether US planners are ready for it or not. is not really backed up by reality. Pretty much the whole US operation so far, destroying much of Iran&amp;#39;s military and leadership was done from US carriers. If anything it demonstrates how powerful they are. Also straits being closed to shipping by whatever power controls the shores is not a new thing. The Bosphophorous has been closed on and…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595213&quot; title=&quot;The position of the article seems to me to be it &amp;#39;won&amp;#39;t&amp;#39; because it can&amp;#39;t. And that is an accurate assessment. It would take much more than the forces in the region, to secure the &amp;#39;strait&amp;#39;. To actually secure the strait, you have to secure the entire Persian Gulf. It doesn&amp;#39;t matter if tankers can pass through the strait only to be blown up just of Qatar. At it&amp;#39;s widest the Gulf is about 360 kilometers, well within the range of most drones, aerial, surface and underwater. So they would have to…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters believe the U.S. has lost the industrial scale to compete with adversaries like China &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47585315&quot; title=&quot;At the heart of this is the fact that America has lost the capability to manufacture anything at scale. High tech interceptors and missiles and aircraft carriers are great, but with China&amp;#39;s help these are outnumbered by three (soon to be four) orders of magnitude. It&amp;#39;s unclear if we can do much other than threaten sanctions and nukes, with not much in between.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that carriers remain powerful assets for air superiority and that current operations demonstrate their continued relevance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594364&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;The era of carrier-dominated airpower is fading, as cheap, unmanned anti-ship weapons reshape naval warfare, whether US planners are ready for it or not. is not really backed up by reality. Pretty much the whole US operation so far, destroying much of Iran&amp;#39;s military and leadership was done from US carriers. If anything it demonstrates how powerful they are. Also straits being closed to shipping by whatever power controls the shores is not a new thing. The Bosphophorous has been closed on and…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47585341&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; this shift in carrier-based projection of power in the era of low-cost drones Nothing in this war has suggested carriers are obsolete. A carrier that launches drones and fields an anti-drone strike group would be amazing. We don’t have that. (And even what we do have is great in the carrier department, it’s given us air parity to superiority from way offshore.)&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant portion of the debate focuses on the grim reality of a potential conflict, comparing it to the &amp;#34;no man&amp;#39;s land&amp;#34; of trench warfare or historical mass-destruction strategies used to collapse economies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47586453&quot; title=&quot;In chapter 11 of All Quiet on the Western Front Paul and his unit find an abandoned food cache in the middle of no mans land. Instead of secreting away the food back to their lines where they will have to share it, they decide to just cook and eat it right then and there. But a spotter plane from the allies sees the smoke and then begins shelling their position. Cue a terrifying, if hilarious, scene where the soldiers try and cook pancakes as shells explode around them. Paul, as the last to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47592230&quot; title=&quot;Trump already said he was just going to bomb all their infrastructure so the economy of the country couldn&amp;#39;t function if they didn&amp;#39;t negotiate and then it&amp;#39;s just going to be a mass refugee crisis. It would be a mass refugee crisis anyway with a protracted ground invasion, but more Americans would die, so Trump is choosing to get it over with the easy way for America at least if they won&amp;#39;t negotiate. IMHO, This is pretty much the strategy the Khans used in the 13th century when they encountered…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rollingout.com/2026/03/31/oracle-slashes-30000-jobs-with-a-cold-6/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Oracle slashes 30k jobs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (rollingout.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47587935&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;914 points · 846 comments · by pje&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oracle has laid off an estimated 20,000 to 30,000 employees via early morning emails to cut costs and fund a massive $58 billion debt-heavy expansion into artificial intelligence infrastructure. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rollingout.com/2026/03/31/oracle-slashes-30000-jobs-with-a-cold-6/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Oracle slashes 30,000 jobs with a cold 6 a.m. email    URL Source: https://rollingout.com/2026/03/31/oracle-slashes-30000-jobs-with-a-cold-6/    Published Time: 2026-03-31T08:08:52-04:00    Markdown Content:  Workers across the U.S., India, and other regions learned their jobs were gone before most people had finished their morning coffee, with no prior warning from HR or their managers.    It was not a phone call. It was not a meeting. For thousands of Oracle employees across the globe, Tuesday…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Oracle&amp;#39;s database was once the industry leader for high availability and scalability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47589555&quot; title=&quot;Short answer: today I think there is genuinely nothing that anyone should use oracle for, but their database used to be seriously far ahead of the competition. A very long time ago (circa 2000) there were basically 2 databases that worked for use cases where you needed high availability and vertical scalability and those were Oracle and Sybase and Oracle was really the only game in town if you actually wanted certain features like online backups and certain replication configurations. At the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, commenters now question its modern value proposition given the rise of free, competitive alternatives like Postgres &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47589152&quot; title=&quot;The bulk of the comments in here are focused on comparing Larry Ellison to a lawn mower, so I&amp;#39;ll try a new tack and say that I&amp;#39;m genuinely confused at what the value prop of Oracle is. Given the history of their business model being licensing of important databases that are hard to switch off of, I&amp;#39;ve actually made a point to avoid using Oracle as much as possible (even so far as to leave MySQL when they acquired it, and I&amp;#39;ve never started a fresh project in Java, which they used to drive a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47589555&quot; title=&quot;Short answer: today I think there is genuinely nothing that anyone should use oracle for, but their database used to be seriously far ahead of the competition. A very long time ago (circa 2000) there were basically 2 databases that worked for use cases where you needed high availability and vertical scalability and those were Oracle and Sybase and Oracle was really the only game in town if you actually wanted certain features like online backups and certain replication configurations. At the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. The massive layoffs are viewed by some as a correction for aggressive pandemic-era hiring &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47588332&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think its that easy. Look at their employee numbers over the years: (ai generated): Oracle Corporation Employee Count (2010 - 2025) Legend: Each &amp;#39;&amp;#39; represents approximately 4,000 employees. Year | Employees    ------------------------------------------------------------------    2010 |  (105,000)    2011 |  (108,000)    2012 |  (115,000)    2013 |  (120,000)    2014 |  (122,000)    2015 |  (132,000)    2016 |  (136,000)    2017 |  (138,000)    2018 |  (137,000)    2019 |  (136,000)    2020 | …&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, while others attribute the cuts to over-investment in AI products that have yet to yield returns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47588231&quot; title=&quot;More victims of AI. Not actually of &amp;#39;AI is replacing jobs&amp;#39;, more &amp;#39;oh shit we are spending too much and the product isn&amp;#39;t good enough for us to ever make a return on our absurd over-investment&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond technical merits, the discussion highlights Oracle&amp;#39;s deep entrenchment in government and classified sectors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47589313&quot; title=&quot;Oracle and Java are deeply embedded in US gov work. How deep? Let&amp;#39;s just say a large number of classified developer jobs hire for Java. Ellison has been a huge proponent of a surveillance state, and that likely ingratiates him with certain three letter agencies. The only developers I know who write Java full time work in systems that take pictures of things from far away.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, as well as the cold, &amp;#34;terror-like&amp;#34; emotional impact of corporate layoff procedures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47589612&quot; title=&quot;My Amazon layoff notice came at 5am.  Same deal.  I thought it was fake because it came to my personal email.  Then I logged into my work computer and found that all my email had been erased except for a copy of the layoff notice and an invite to a 10am Zoom with HR.  The funny part was the invite had everyone who had been laid off in the To: line. I was able to send internal only emails until 1pm, and then it logged me off and the computer was a brick.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47589858&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not sure if companies understand the emotional impact on the laid off and the layoff survivors. It almost seems like a terror campaign, whether intended or not.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://idlewords.com/2026/03/artemis_ii_is_not_safe_to_fly.htm&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Artemis II is not safe to fly&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (idlewords.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47582043&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;903 points · 637 comments · by idlewords&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NASA is facing criticism for proceeding with the crewed Artemis II mission despite significant heat shield damage, including material &amp;#34;spalling&amp;#34; and melted bolts, observed during the uncrewed Artemis I flight, raising concerns that schedule and budget pressures are compromising astronaut safety. &lt;a href=&quot;https://idlewords.com/2026/03/artemis_ii_is_not_safe_to_fly.htm&quot; title=&quot;Title: Artemis II Is Not Safe to Fly (Idle Words)    URL Source: https://idlewords.com/2026/03/artemis_ii_is_not_safe_to_fly.htm    Published Time: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 04:57:25 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Artemis II Is Not Safe to Fly (Idle Words)    [![Image 1](https://idlewords.com/images/toothfish.png)](https://idlewords.com/)    [« New Martian Writing](https://idlewords.com/2026/03/new_martian_writing.htm)    **03.30.[2026](https://idlewords.com/2026/)**  [Artemis II Is Not Safe to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Critics argue that the Artemis II heat shield issues mirror the &amp;#34;broken safety culture&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;success-oriented planning&amp;#34; that led to the Challenger and Columbia disasters, where unexpected hardware behavior was eventually normalized as an acceptable risk &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47582655&quot; title=&quot;I haven&amp;#39;t kept up with Artemis development but I&amp;#39;ve read extensively about Challenger and Columbia. These two parts of the article stood out to me: &amp;gt; Moon-to-Mars Deputy Administrator Amit Kshatriya said: “it was very small localized areas. Interestingly, it would be much easier for us to analyze if we had larger chunks and it was more defined”. A Lockheed Martin representative on the same call added that &amp;#39;there was a healthy margin remaining of that virgin Avcoat. So it wasn’t like there were…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47586552&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m literally guest lecturing at a Harvard class tomorrow on systemic failures in decision making, using the Columbia and Challenger disasters as case studies, and changed my slides last night to include Artemis II because it could literally happen again. This broken safety culture has been around since the beginning of the Shuttle program. In 1980, Gregg Easterbrook published &amp;#39;Goodbye, Columbia&amp;#39; in The Washington Monthly [1], warning that NASA&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;success-oriented planning&amp;#39; and political…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47582327&quot; title=&quot;Great read and interesting article. Hard to believe that NASA would risk astronauts lives simply to save face, but that appears to be what&amp;#39;s going to happen.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others contend this comparison is unfair, noting that NASA has analyzed the current problem deeply rather than ignoring it, and that both engineers and astronauts currently believe the mission is safe &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47583210&quot; title=&quot;This is a more balanced take, in my opinion: https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/01/nasa-chief-reviews-ori... Camarda is an outlier. The engineers at NASA believe it is safe. The astronauts believe it is safe. Former astronaut Danny Olivas was initially skeptical of the heat shield but came around. And note that the OP believes it is likely (maybe very likely) that the heat shield will work fine. It&amp;#39;s hard for me to reconcile &amp;#39;It is likely that Artemis II will land safely&amp;#39; with &amp;#39;Artemis II is…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. The debate also touches on whether manned space exploration should be viewed as a high-risk endeavor akin to extreme sports, where some level of tragedy is an acceptable trade-off for progress &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47583044&quot; title=&quot;About the last point: At this point in time, manned space exploration should come out of our entertainment budget.  The same budget we use for football or olympic games.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47587206&quot; title=&quot;humans are so oblivious to safety It seems that in modern times, humans focus on safety almost to the exclusion of everything else. As much as the more traditional salutations &amp;#39;godspeed&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;have a nice day&amp;#39;, we&amp;#39;re even more likely to hear &amp;#39;drive safe&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;have a safe trip&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;be safe&amp;#39;. We&amp;#39;re very nearly paralyzed by insisting that everything must be maximally safe. Surely you&amp;#39;ve heard the mantra &amp;#39;...if it saves just one life...&amp;#39;. The optimal amount of tragedy is not zero. It&amp;#39;s correct that we…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/31/openai-funding-round-ipo.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OpenAI closes funding round at an $852B valuation&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cnbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47592755&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;529 points · 494 comments · by surprisetalk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI has finalized a new funding round that values the artificial intelligence company at $852 billion. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/31/openai-funding-round-ipo.html&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;openai.com&amp;amp;#x2F;index&amp;amp;#x2F;accelerating-the-next-phase-ai&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;openai.com&amp;amp;#x2F;index&amp;amp;#x2F;accelerating-the-next-phase-ai&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reported $852B valuation and $122B funding round have drawn skepticism, with commenters noting that much of the capital is contingent on future milestones and may be a &amp;#34;reality-distortion field&amp;#34; intended to signal market dominance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47593513&quot; title=&quot;No, they didn&amp;#39;t raise $122B as the HN title implies. A big chunk of that $122B is a &amp;#39;maybe&amp;#39; that depends on various things that need to happen in the future. Oh, man... I can&amp;#39;t wait to see where this is going. Might not be pretty after all.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47593007&quot; title=&quot;I think this is reality-distortion field rivaling that of Jobs&amp;#39;, and a crisis of faith. Nobody apparently believes that capital is worth investing into anything but AI.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594004&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve wondered how many announced fundraising rounds were like this. It&amp;#39;s in everyone&amp;#39;s interest (VCs and entrepreneurs) if the message to the outside world is &amp;#39;this company is amazing so they&amp;#39;ve raised a boatload of cash&amp;#39;. But VCs might not want to give it all up front, or unconditionally. It makes it hard to say what the valuation of a company is. If the milestones are unlikely to be hit, then it&amp;#39;s anyone&amp;#39;s guess.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While OpenAI&amp;#39;s revenue growth is significant, critics argue that focusing on revenue ignores massive projected compute costs—potentially $150 billion annually—and the lack of clear profitability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47593514&quot; title=&quot;$2b/month which is $24b/year. Not as much as I expected considering they were at $20b by end of 2025.[0] They only added $4b since? Anthropic had $19b by end of February 2026 and they added $6b in February alone.[1] This means if they added another $6b in March, they&amp;#39;re higher than OpenAI already. However, I heard that OpenAI and Anthropic report revenue in a different way. OpenAI takes 20% of revenue from Azure sales and reports revenue on that 20%. Anthropic reports all revenue, including…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47593785&quot; title=&quot;And that is revenue only. In the past 15 or so years most US companies (and especially startups) always talk about revenue only. Wheras only profit should matter. E.g. what good is 20 billion per year when &amp;#39;OpenAI is  targeting roughly $600  billion in total compute spending through 2030&amp;#39;. That is $150 billion per year?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, there is a debate over whether AI is a truly transformative &amp;#34;electricity&amp;#34; moment or a &amp;#34;VR moment&amp;#34; where the actual utility of AI agents is being overestimated by investors who have few other attractive places to park capital &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47593524&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Nobody apparently believes that capital is worth investing into anything but AI. This is the main reason we see this insane investment into AI imo. If you imagine having lots of money, where should you invest that currently? Housing market: Seems very overvalued (at least in germany). Also with the current uncertainty and inflation its hard to make an investment that pays back over 20-30 years. So building is also difficult. Stocks are very volatile currently. Not only since Iran. To me it…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47593106&quot; title=&quot;I can&amp;#39;t help but think building an &amp;#39;everything&amp;#39; app is so.. both unbelievably ambitious, and a folly. I am not personally convinced that people want all the things that this super app purports to do. I am from a generation that still sits behind a desktop computer when making &amp;#39;big purchases.&amp;#39; I can&amp;#39;t even buy a flight on my phone. I am so much less likely to want to have an AI agent do that for me. Then the idea that daily consumption of these products will drive people to use them more at…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ollama.com/blog/mlx&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ollama is now powered by MLX on Apple Silicon in preview&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ollama.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47582482&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;646 points · 355 comments · by redundantly&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ollama has integrated Apple’s MLX framework to significantly accelerate AI model performance on Apple Silicon, introducing NVFP4 quantization support and improved caching for faster, more memory-efficient coding and agentic tasks on macOS. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ollama.com/blog/mlx&quot; title=&quot;Title: Ollama is now powered by MLX on Apple Silicon in preview · Ollama Blog    URL Source: https://ollama.com/blog/mlx    Markdown Content:  # Ollama is now powered by MLX on Apple Silicon in preview · Ollama Blog  [![Image 1: Ollama](https://ollama.com/public/ollama.png)](https://ollama.com/)    [Models](https://ollama.com/search)[Docs](https://ollama.com/docs)[Pricing](https://ollama.com/pricing)    [Sign in](https://ollama.com/signin)[Download](https://ollama.com/download)    - [x]…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The consensus among many users is that on-device LLMs represent the future of computing due to improved privacy, reduced latency, and the elimination of subscription costs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47582826&quot; title=&quot;LLMs on device is the future. It&amp;#39;s more secure and solves the problem of too much demand for inference compared to data center supply, it also would use less electricity. It&amp;#39;s just a matter of getting the performance good enough. Most users don&amp;#39;t need frontier model performance.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47587546&quot; title=&quot;On-device models are the future. Users prefer them. No privacy issues. No dealing with connectivity, tokens, or changes to vendors implementations. I have an app using Foundation Model, and it works great. I only wish I could backport it to pre macOS 26 versions.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. However, skeptics argue that users generally prioritize convenience over privacy and that local models may never match the efficiency or &amp;#34;frontier&amp;#34; intelligence of massive cloud-based data centers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47587875&quot; title=&quot;Users don’t care about “privacy”.  If they did, Meta and Alphabet wouldn’t be worth $1T+. Users really don’t matter at all.  The revenue for AI companies will be B2B where the user is not the customer  - including coding agents.  Most people don’t even use computers as their primary “computing device” and most people are buying crappy low end Android phones - no I’m not saying all Android phones are crappy.  But that’s what most people are buying with the average selling price of an Android…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47582950&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Most users don&amp;#39;t need frontier model performance&amp;#39; unfortunately, this is not the case.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47582940&quot; title=&quot;It isn&amp;#39;t going to replace cloud LLMs since cloud LLMs will always be faster in throughput and smarter. Cloud and local LLMs will grow together, not replace each other. I&amp;#39;m not convinced that local LLMs use less electricity either. Per token at the same level of intelligence, cloud LLMs should run circles around local LLMs in efficiency. If it doesn&amp;#39;t, what are we paying hundreds of billions of dollars for? I think local LLMs will continue to grow and there will be an &amp;#39;ChatGPT&amp;#39; moment for it…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable anecdotes include developers using local models for bash scripts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47584060&quot; title=&quot;I created &amp;#39;apfel&amp;#39; https://github.com/Arthur-Ficial/apfel a CLI for the apple on-device local foundation model (Apple intelligence) yeah its super limited with its 4k context window and super common false positives guardrails (just ask it to describe a color) ... bit still ... using it in bash scripts that just work without calling home / out or incurring extra costs feels super powerful.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt; and experimenting with &amp;#34;uncensored&amp;#34; models that bypass the strict guardrails found in corporate or state-influenced AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47583593&quot; title=&quot;I very recently installed llama.cpp on my consumer-grade M4 MBP, and I&amp;#39;ve been having loads of fun poking and prodding the local models. There&amp;#39;s now a ChatGPT style interface baked into llama.cpp, which is very handy for quick experimentation. (I&amp;#39;m not entirely sure what Ollama would get me that llama.cpp doesn&amp;#39;t, happy to hear suggestions!) There are some surprisingly decent models that happily fit even into a mere 16 gigs of RAM. The recent Qwen 3.5 9B model is pretty good, though it did trip…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. There are also concerns that the current era of high-quality open-weight models is a temporary &amp;#34;bubble&amp;#34; driven by corporate competition and venture capital that may eventually shift toward paid or closed-source models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47583019&quot; title=&quot;You could argue that the only reason we have good open-weight models is because companies are trying to undermine the big dogs, and they are spending millions to make sure they dont get too far ahead. If the bubble pops then there wont be incentive to keep doing it.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47583042&quot; title=&quot;I agree. I can totally see in the future that open source LLMs will turn into paying a lumpsum for the model. Many will shut down. Some will turn into closed source labs. When VCs inevitably ask their AI labs to start making money or shut down, those free open source LLMS will cease to be free. Chinese AI labs have to release free open source models because they distill from OpenAI and Anthropic. They will always be behind. Therefore, they can&amp;#39;t charge the same prices as OpenAI and Anthropic.…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/30/github_copilot_ads_pull_requests/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GitHub backs down, kills Copilot pull-request ads after backlash&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theregister.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47582984&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;609 points · 368 comments · by _____k&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GitHub has disabled a feature that allowed Copilot to inject promotional &amp;#34;tips&amp;#34; into human-authored pull requests following developer backlash over the AI&amp;#39;s unauthorized edits. GitHub executives admitted the behavior was a &amp;#34;wrong judgment call&amp;#34; and clarified that such tips will no longer appear in those contexts. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/30/github_copilot_ads_pull_requests/&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub backs down, kills Copilot pull-request ads after backlash    URL Source: https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/30/github_copilot_ads_pull_requests/    Published Time: 2026-03-30T20:47:24Z    Markdown Content:  # GitHub backs down, kills Copilot PR ‘tips’ after backlash • The Register    [The Register Home Page![Image 1](https://cdn.theregister.com/assets/images/the_register_logo.6befe899.svg)![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The community reacted with sharp criticism toward GitHub’s attempt to rebrand advertisements as &amp;#34;product tips,&amp;#34; viewing it as a waste of top-tier engineering talent and a sign of Microsoft’s &amp;#34;marketing-driven&amp;#34; influence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47583315&quot; title=&quot;Calling advertisements &amp;#39;product tips&amp;#39; as if everybody is too stupid to understand what that means. They created an amazing technology that oftentimes is indistinguishable from magic and then use it to deliver ads and - sorry about the tangent - kill people. This really is the quote of the century: &amp;gt; The best minds of my generation are thinking about how to make people click ads What a waste.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47586922&quot; title=&quot;The worst part of Microsoft is whoever is running their marketing department, they just inject themselves into everything, like Windows. GitHub is different, they will 100% lose users and income if they don&amp;#39;t learn to back the hell off of it though. Windows, well, everyone complains about Windows no matter what, so valid complaints are ignored. With Office, well, your employer is paying for it, so you have no say in it anyway. It&amp;#39;s clearly the marketing dept at Microsoft swoops in and poisons…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Many users expressed a sense of betrayal, arguing that Microsoft is ruining GitHub&amp;#39;s dominance by prioritizing monetization over user experience, which has prompted discussions about migrating to alternatives like GitLab &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47586738&quot; title=&quot;I’ll never understand why they ruined GitHub. They had everything they needed - the one place in the world where 99% of open source projects were hosted, where all the discussions happened. A product that people were so used to that it was a no brainer when it came to hosting private repos. And they had to ruin it and give space to GitLab and other competitors. What a waste…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47585136&quot; title=&quot;I guess it&amp;#39;s time to consider ditching GitHub. Everything that are purchased by Microsoft ware destined to be rotten.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47585906&quot; title=&quot;What are some good alternatives for closed source codebases that people have been using and enjoying? I only ask because I already know of good alternatives for FOSS, but it&amp;#39;s the private / work projects that keep me tethered to GH for now.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate whether the &amp;#34;best minds&amp;#34; are truly being wasted on ads or simply finding ways to fund free technology, there is a strong consensus that the platform&amp;#39;s moral and product direction has declined since the acquisition &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47583321&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;You&amp;#39;re just a bunch of fanatic, Linux obsessed Microsoft haters living in the past. Microsoft are the good guys now.&amp;#39; -- ca. everyone here, during the GitHub acquisition&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47584733&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; sorry about the tangent I understand why you felt the need to do it, but it’s still sad that you have to apologise for it. It’s not like if using technology for killing is a fringe hypothesis, it’s happening right now and on the news. It’s a discussion worth having. &amp;gt; This really is the quote of the century I loathe that quote. The people thinking about how to make others click ads are only concerned with themselves and their own profit. To me that does not qualify as a “best mind”. Maybe a…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47583974&quot; title=&quot;I don’t think the quote is particularly fair.  You could just as easily see it as the best minds are building huge amounts of amazing, free technology and need a way to pay for it. For every microsecond level ad auction broker there’s a free Android update, cat video platform enhancement, calendar app feature, or type checked scripting language release. HFT on the other hand — now there’s a tech black hole! [edited to add What have the Romans ever done for us? , below]&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-copilot/for-individuals/termsofuse&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft: Copilot is for entertainment purposes only&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (microsoft.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47587866&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;598 points · 208 comments · by lpcvoid&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft&amp;#39;s updated terms of use state that Copilot is for entertainment purposes only, warning users that the AI can make mistakes and should not be relied upon for important advice. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-copilot/for-individuals/termsofuse&quot; title=&quot;Title: Copilot - Terms of Use    URL Source: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-copilot/for-individuals/termsofuse    Markdown Content:  **IF YOU LIVE IN (OR YOUR PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS IN) THE UNITED STATES, PLEASE READ THE BINDING ARBITRATION CLAUSE AND CLASS ACTION WAIVER IN SECTION 15 OF THE [MICROSOFT SERVICES AGREEMENT](https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=530144). IT AFFECTS HOW DISPUTES RELATING TO THESE TERMS ARE RESOLVED.**    Welcome to Copilot, your personal AI…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters express frustration with &amp;#34;legalese&amp;#34; that allows companies to disclaim liability for tools marketed as professional, with some arguing that obtuse contracts should be automatically invalid &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47588799&quot; title=&quot;Lawyers are playing Calvinball again. I have no idea why the law finds this kind of argumentation compelling. &amp;#39;I clearly intentionally deceived, but I stashed some bullshit legalese into a document no one will read so my deception is completely OK.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47588977&quot; title=&quot;When the contract is purposefully obtuse and hard to understand, that should be a valid legal defense. When it&amp;#39;s huge, falls upon people that can&amp;#39;t justify a lawyer, and keeps changing all the time, one shouldn&amp;#39;t even need to claim it. It should be automatically invalid.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a notable focus on the absurdity of Anthropic&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;Pro&amp;#34; plan prohibiting commercial use in Europe, a restriction verified by users through VPN testing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47590473&quot; title=&quot;Anthropic does a somewhat similar thing. If you visit their ToS (the one for Max/Pro plans) from a European IP address, they replace one section with this: Non-commercial use only. You agree not to use our Services for any commercial or business purposes and we (and our Providers) have no liability to you for any loss of profit, loss of business, business interruption, or loss of business opportunity. It&amp;#39;s funny that a plan called &amp;#39;Pro&amp;#39; cannot be used professionally.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47591217&quot; title=&quot;Ha out of curiosity I loaded that same consumer terms URL on both a USA and a UK VPN exit node - sure enough, the UK terms inject that extra clause you quoted banning commercial usage that is not present for USA users. diff of the changes between US and UK: https://www.diffchecker.com/BtqVrR9p/ There&amp;#39;s the usual expected legal boilerplate differences. However, the UK version injects the additional clause at line 134 that has no analog in the US version.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view these disclaimers as standard software boilerplate &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47591577&quot; title=&quot;Software in general has disclaimed any warranties or fitness for purpose for as long as I can remember. This is nothing new.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47589225&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Copilot is for entertainment purposes only. It can make mistakes, and it may not work as intended. Don’t rely on Copilot for important advice. Use Copilot at your own risk. Seems pretty clear to me, do you really think people need a lawyer to understand that?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others warn that such clauses ensure human employees remain the sole point of accountability when AI systems fail &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47591534&quot; title=&quot;Well, there&amp;#39;s your rationale as to why AI cannot replace you. When sh!t hits the fan, Anthropic will immediately point to this clause. Who knows, maybe a court would see it as valid. Meanwhile, your customer (and thus, your management) is looking for someone to blame for excrement making contact with the impellers. And that someone&amp;#39;s gonna be you.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://scottlawsonbc.com/post/dot-system&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A dot a day keeps the clutter away&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (scottlawsonbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47593556&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;581 points · 168 comments · by scottlawson&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scott Lawson’s &amp;#34;dot system&amp;#34; tracks workshop utility by adding a color-coded sticker to a clear storage box each day it is used. This low-tech, four-year experiment uses visual data to identify essential tools and components, helping declutter workspaces by moving unused &amp;#34;cold storage&amp;#34; items out. &lt;a href=&quot;https://scottlawsonbc.com/post/dot-system&quot; title=&quot;Title: A Dot a Day Keeps the Clutter Away — Scott Lawson    URL Source: https://scottlawsonbc.com/post/dot-system    Markdown Content:  # A Dot a Day Keeps the Clutter Away — Scott Lawson    [![Image 1](https://scottlawsonbc.com/static/logo.png?v=1775018714580) Scott Lawson](https://scottlawsonbc.com/)    [Posts](https://scottlawsonbc.com/posts)[About](https://scottlawsonbc.com/about)    ## A Dot a Day Keeps the Clutter Away    2026-03-23    Walk into my lab and the first thing you&amp;#39;ll notice is the dots. The…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#34;dot a day&amp;#34; system for tracking item usage via stickers on transparent containers sparked debate over whether physical friction or digital automation is more effective for decluttering &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594312&quot; title=&quot;First, great system. Second, I am going to pine for an electronic version and having read the post I get it. Feel free to laugh and read the next comment. That said there are two aspects to this system that come to mind immediately: - The value of the information: This is the purpose of the dots and, I think the stated reason for the dots. - The value of the process: If you did this and didn&amp;#39;t have the final dot information, would it still be valuable in some way? I suspect there is value here…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595582&quot; title=&quot;A lazy wall of AI slop: &amp;gt; I was looking for something simple. Something right-sized for my scale. &amp;gt; Clear boxes don&amp;#39;t have this problem. They scale. &amp;gt; That&amp;#39;s not a failure. That&amp;#39;s the system working. I wonder if there&amp;#39;s a simple regex that could detect these. Perhaps I should ask Claude The entirety of this post could be explained in 20 tokens: 1) use transparent boxes and bags for organizing 2) track the usage with stickers 3) remove rarely accessed boxes We need a sponsorblock-style…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594442&quot; title=&quot;I definitely see the appeal of an electronic version. I think it really depends on what you care about tracking. Food? Maybe use the same barcodes already on the product. Clothes? maybe RFID patches that are unobtrusive. Things that are subject to a lot of wear and tear and handled a lot will not work well with dots as they will come off, but I don&amp;#39;t find that to be a problem for the front of storage boxes so it works for me. While I don&amp;#39;t have an electronic system for tracking parts bins, the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users suggested high-tech alternatives like AR tagging, RFID patches, or NFC scans to avoid &amp;#34;visual clutter&amp;#34; and sticky residue &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594312&quot; title=&quot;First, great system. Second, I am going to pine for an electronic version and having read the post I get it. Feel free to laugh and read the next comment. That said there are two aspects to this system that come to mind immediately: - The value of the information: This is the purpose of the dots and, I think the stated reason for the dots. - The value of the process: If you did this and didn&amp;#39;t have the final dot information, would it still be valuable in some way? I suspect there is value here…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594885&quot; title=&quot;I hope those are plastic stickers because I can&amp;#39;t imagine the pain of removing each paper sticker and have it shred into various tiny bits and while leaving some sticky gum behind.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595489&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Clothes? maybe RFID patches that are unobtrusive. Decathlon and Zara both have RFID tags in their products. https://sustainability.decathlon.com/product-traceability-an... (Decathlon) https://www.inditex.com/itxcomweb/so/en/press/news-detail/7f... (Inditex is the parent company of Zara. Link is a press release from 2014.) So if one were to buy all their clothes at Decathlon (clothes for sports and other outdoor activities) and Zara (everyday wear as well as fancier clothing), and found a…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594660&quot; title=&quot;Imo NFC tags could be the easiest way of doing the same thing for bigger items, scan it when you use it, log it.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others argued that low-tech solutions like stacking boxes by most-recent-use or using nail polish for color-coding are more practical &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594589&quot; title=&quot;My low-tech solution to organizing electronic parts is to use shoeboxes, with written labels at the end, and plastic bags inside to organize the various groups of items. They stack, and I am lazy, and so I put the one I just pulled out from the middle of the stack back on top. So the ones on top are the ones I use.  If they are at the bottom they don&amp;#39;t get used much. On the other hand, I don&amp;#39;t care which ones I use a lot as I am not trying find candidates for eviction.  I just care about not…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594587&quot; title=&quot;This is neat but my OCD brain is hurting. I suspect a location based sorting, where most-recently-used boxes are near the top, or closer to your workstation, solves the same problem without the visual clutter.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594977&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I can&amp;#39;t imagine the pain of removing each paper sticker and have it shred into various tiny bits and while leaving some sticky gum behind. One product many have at home (if they&amp;#39;ve got a wife or if they&amp;#39;re a woman): nail polish remover. This is a magical tool for it&amp;#39;s ubiquitous. Sure, you can go and buy the proper stuff: but this one many already have some at home. It works also should sticky stuff fall from trees on your car&amp;#39;s windshield (do not use it on the car paint). It&amp;#39;s really miracle…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. A common criticism noted that tracking frequency does not account for the importance of rarely used items, such as an ice cream maker or specific electronic components, which may still be worth keeping despite low usage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594457&quot; title=&quot;Interesting, but this seems to solve the wrong problem. I already know that the ice cream maker sitting on the shelf hasn&amp;#39;t been used in 5 years. The problem is... what if I want to make ice cream?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594589&quot; title=&quot;My low-tech solution to organizing electronic parts is to use shoeboxes, with written labels at the end, and plastic bags inside to organize the various groups of items. They stack, and I am lazy, and so I put the one I just pulled out from the middle of the stack back on top. So the ones on top are the ones I use.  If they are at the bottom they don&amp;#39;t get used much. On the other hand, I don&amp;#39;t care which ones I use a lot as I am not trying find candidates for eviction.  I just care about not…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/drona23/claude-token-efficient&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Universal Claude.md – cut Claude output tokens&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47581701&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;471 points · 162 comments · by killme2008&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The `claude-token-efficient` GitHub repository provides a drop-in `CLAUDE.md` file designed to reduce Claude&amp;#39;s output tokens by approximately 63% by eliminating conversational filler, sycophancy, and redundant formatting without requiring code changes. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/drona23/claude-token-efficient&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - drona23/claude-token-efficient: Universal CLAUDE.md - cut Claude output tokens by 63%. Drop-in. No code changes.    URL Source: https://github.com/drona23/claude-token-efficient    Markdown Content:  # GitHub - drona23/claude-token-efficient: Universal CLAUDE.md - cut Claude output tokens by 63%. Drop-in. No code changes. · GitHub    [Skip to content](https://github.com/drona23/claude-token-efficient#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether forcing Claude to be more concise—such as requiring answers before reasoning—actually improves efficiency or degrades the model&amp;#39;s performance by violating its autoregressive nature and training distribution &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47581841&quot; title=&quot;It seems the benchmarks here are heavily biased towards single-shot explanatory tasks, not agentic loops where code is generated: https://github.com/drona23/claude-token-efficient/blob/main/... And I think this raises a really important question. When you&amp;#39;re deep into a project that&amp;#39;s iterating on a live codebase, does Claude&amp;#39;s default verbosity, where it&amp;#39;s allowed to expound on why it&amp;#39;s doing what it&amp;#39;s doing when it&amp;#39;s writing massive files, allow the session to remain more coherent and focused…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47581985&quot; title=&quot;From the file: &amp;#39;Answer is always line 1. Reasoning comes after, never before.&amp;#39; LLMs are autoregressive (filling in the completion of what came before), so you&amp;#39;d better have thinking mode on or the &amp;#39;reasoning&amp;#39; is pure confirmation bias seeded by the answer that gets locked in via the first output tokens.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47582120&quot; title=&quot;Things like this make me sad because they make obvious that most people don’t understand a bit about how LLM work. The “answer before reasoning” is a good evidence for it. It misses the most fundamental concept of tranaformers: the are autoregressive. Also, the reinforcement learning is what make the model behave like what you are trying to avoid. So the model output is actually what performs best in the kind of software engineering task you are trying to achieve. I’m not sure, but I’m pretty…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find value in &amp;#34;handoff&amp;#34; files to distill long-term context and maintain project history, others warn that constantly tweaking workflows with new &amp;#34;cure-all&amp;#34; prompts can be disruptive &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47581897&quot; title=&quot;I wrote a skill called /handoff. Whenever a session is nearing a compaction limit or has served its usefulness, it generates and commits a markdown file explaining everything it did or talked about. It’s called /handoff because you do it before a compaction. (“Isn’t that what compaction is for?” Yes, but those go away. This is like a permanent record of compacted sessions.) I don’t know if it helps maintain long term coherency, but my sessions do occasionally reference those docs. More than…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47582100&quot; title=&quot;I was reading through the Claude docs and it was talking about common patterns to preserve context across sessions. One pattern was a &amp;#39;handoff file&amp;#39;, which they explained like &amp;#39;have claude save a summary of the current session into a handoff file, start a new session, then tell it to read the file.&amp;#39; That sounded like a nice idea, so I made it effortless beyond typing /handoff. The generated docs turned out to be really handy for me personally, so I kept using it, and committed them into my…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47581956&quot; title=&quot;As with all of these cure-alls, I&amp;#39;m wary. Mostly I&amp;#39;m wary because I anticipate the developer will lose interest in very little time and also because it will just get subsumed into CC at some point if it actually works. It might take longer but changing my workflow every few days for the new thing that&amp;#39;s going to reduce MCP usage, replace it, compress it, etc is way too disruptive. I&amp;#39;m generally happy with the base Claude Code and I think running a near-vanilla setup is the best option currently…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, there is a notable observation regarding how Claude’s documentation and patterns, such as specific terminology like &amp;#34;handoff&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;gate,&amp;#34; subtly influence user behavior and industry language &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47582047&quot; title=&quot;Did you call it &amp;#39;/handoff&amp;#39; or did Claude name it that? The reason I&amp;#39;m asking is because I noticed a pattern with Claude subtly influencing me. For example, the first time I heard the the word &amp;#39;gate&amp;#39; was from Claude and 1 week later I hear it everywhere including on Hacker News. I didn&amp;#39;t use the word &amp;#39;handoff&amp;#39; but Claude creates handoff files also [0]. I was thinking about this all day. Because Claude didn&amp;#39;t just use the word &amp;#39;gate&amp;#39; it created an entire system around it that includes handoffs…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47582112&quot; title=&quot;Oh, so the word &amp;#39;gate&amp;#39; is probably in the documentation also! I see. So this isn&amp;#39;t as scary. Claude is helping me understand how to use it properly.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://damrnelson.github.io/github-historical-uptime/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GitHub&amp;#39;s Historic Uptime&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (damrnelson.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47591928&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;498 points · 122 comments · by todsacerdoti&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This page provides historical uptime charts for GitHub, utilizing data sourced directly from the platform&amp;#39;s official status page. &lt;a href=&quot;https://damrnelson.github.io/github-historical-uptime/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Historical GitHub Uptime Charts    URL Source: https://damrnelson.github.io/github-historical-uptime/    Published Time: Sun, 08 Mar 2026 20:12:24 GMT    Warning: This is a cached snapshot of the original page, consider retry with caching opt-out.    Markdown Content:  ## GitHub&amp;#39;s Historic Uptime    All data sourced from the [official status page](https://www.githubstatus.com/uptime).&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While GitHub&amp;#39;s reported uptime has faced criticism for dropping as low as 98% for specific services like Actions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47592453&quot; title=&quot;It has been pretty rough.  Their own numbers report just a single `9` for Actions in Feb 2026 with 98% uptime.  But that said -- I don&amp;#39;t get the 90% number. Anecdotally, it seems believable that 1 in 50 times (2%) in Feb that Actions barfed.  Which is not very nice, but it wasn&amp;#39;t at 1 in 10 times (10%).&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, users debate whether the &amp;#34;90% aggregate&amp;#34; figure is a fair metric or a misleading &amp;#34;venn diagram&amp;#34; of partial outages &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47592319&quot; title=&quot;Even better IMO is this status page: https://mrshu.github.io/github-statuses/ &amp;#39;The Missing GitHub Status Page&amp;#39; with overall aggregate percentages. Currently at 90.84% over the last 90 days. It was at 90.00% a couple days ago.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47592612&quot; title=&quot;It looks like the aggregate stats are more of a venn diagram than an average. So if 1/N services are down, the aggregate is considered down. I don&amp;#39;t think this is an accurate way to calculate this. It should be weighted or in some way show partial outages. This belief is derived from the Google SRE book, in particular chapters 3 (embracing risk) and 4 (service level objectives) https://sre.google/sre-book/embracing-risk/ https://sre.google/sre-book/service-level-objectives/&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47592742&quot; title=&quot;I think reasonable people can disagree on this. From the point of view of an individual developer, it may be &amp;#39;fraction of tasks affected by downtime&amp;#39; - which would lie between the average and the aggregate, as many tasks use multiple (but not all) features. But if you take the point of view of a customer, it might not matter as much &amp;#39;which&amp;#39; part is broken. To use a bad analogy, if my car is in the shop 10% of the time, it&amp;#39;s not much comfort if each individual component is only broken 0.1% of…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Some argue the apparent historical decline is skewed by improved observability, the addition of complex new products, and a &amp;#34;zoomed-in&amp;#34; graph scale that exaggerates minor fluctuations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47592323&quot; title=&quot;I got Claude to make me the exact same graph a few weeks ago!  I had hypothesized that we&amp;#39;d see a sharp drop off, instead what I found (as this project also shows) is a rather messy average trend of outages that has been going on for some time. The graph being all nice before the Microsoft acquisition is a fun narrative, until you realize that some products (like actions, announced on October 16th, 2018) didn&amp;#39;t exist and therefore had no outages.  Easy to correct for by setting up start dates,…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47593086&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not a GitHub apologist, but that graph isn&amp;#39;t at scale, at all. It&amp;#39;s massively zoomed in, with a lower band of 99.5%. It makes it look far worse than it is.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Skepticism also exists regarding the accuracy of pre-2018 data, with suggestions that earlier &amp;#34;perfect&amp;#34; records may reflect marketing-driven reporting rather than actual stability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47592443&quot; title=&quot;Is the pre-2018 data actually accurate?  There seem to have been a number of outages before then: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateEnd=1545696000&amp;amp;dateRange=custom&amp;amp;... Maybe that&amp;#39;s just the date when they started tracking uptime using this sytem?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47592807&quot; title=&quot;Data comes from the official status page. It may be more a marketing/communication page than an observability page (especially before selling)&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://prismml.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: 1-Bit Bonsai, the First Commercially Viable 1-Bit LLMs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (prismml.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47593422&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;426 points · 151 comments · by PrismML&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Prism ML has launched 1-bit Bonsai, a family of ultra-dense large language models designed for edge computing and robotics that offer up to 14x memory reduction and 8x faster speeds while maintaining benchmark performance. &lt;a href=&quot;https://prismml.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: PrismML — Concentrating intelligence    URL Source: https://prismml.com/    Published Time: Sat, 04 Apr 2026 00:06:02 GMT    Markdown Content:  # PrismML — Concentrating intelligence    [![Image 1](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/697a3312d33c2cc715ec3899/69961847735f3ec32aafc18e_prism-logo.svg)](https://prismml.com/)    [About](https://prismml.com/about)[News](https://prismml.com/news)[Careers](https://prismml.com/#careers)[Contact](https://prismml.com/#)[![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 1-bit Bonsai model demonstrates impressive knowledge density and &amp;#34;blazing fast&amp;#34; inference speeds, even on older hardware or consumer GPUs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594919&quot; title=&quot;1 bit with a FP16 scale factor every 128 bits. Fascinating that this works so well. I tried a few things with it. Got it driving Cursor, which in itself was impressive - it handled some tool usage. Via cursor I had it generate a few web page tests. On a monte carlo simulation of pi, it got the logic correct but failed to build an interface to start the test. Requesting changes mostly worked, but left over some symbols which caused things to fail. Required a bit of manual editing. Tried a Simon…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595166&quot; title=&quot;Thanks for sharing the link to your instance. Was blazing fast in responding. Tried throwing a few things at it with the following results:  1. Generating an R script to take a city and country name and finding it&amp;#39;s lat/long and mapping it using ggmaps. Generated a pretty decent script (could be more optimal but impressive for the model size) with warnings about using geojson if possible  2. Generate a latex script to display the gaussian integral equation - generated a (I think) non-standard…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47597268&quot; title=&quot;Open access for next 5 hours (8GiB model, running on RTX 3090) or until server crashes or the this spot instance gets taken away :) =&amp;gt; https://ofo1j9j6qh20a8-80.proxy.runpod.net ./build/bin/llama-server \     -m ../Bonsai-8B.gguf \     -ngl 999 \     --flash-attn on \     --host 0.0.0.0 \     --port 80 \     --ctx-size 65500 \     --batch-size 512 \     --ubatch-size 512 \     --parallel 5 \     --cont-batching \     --threads 8 \     --threads-batch 8 \     --cache-type-k q4_0 \     --cache-type-v q4_0 \    …&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users expressed skepticism about the massive information loss inherent in 1-bit quantization, others noted that the model successfully handled complex tasks like generating LaTeX equations, R scripts, and basic tool usage in Cursor &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594919&quot; title=&quot;1 bit with a FP16 scale factor every 128 bits. Fascinating that this works so well. I tried a few things with it. Got it driving Cursor, which in itself was impressive - it handled some tool usage. Via cursor I had it generate a few web page tests. On a monte carlo simulation of pi, it got the logic correct but failed to build an interface to start the test. Requesting changes mostly worked, but left over some symbols which caused things to fail. Required a bit of manual editing. Tried a Simon…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595541&quot; title=&quot;I can’t see how this is possible. You’re losing so much information.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595166&quot; title=&quot;Thanks for sharing the link to your instance. Was blazing fast in responding. Tried throwing a few things at it with the following results:  1. Generating an R script to take a city and country name and finding it&amp;#39;s lat/long and mapping it using ggmaps. Generated a pretty decent script (could be more optimal but impressive for the model size) with warnings about using geojson if possible  2. Generate a latex script to display the gaussian integral equation - generated a (I think) non-standard…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. However, limitations remain in logical reasoning and abstract image generation, with the model failing common &amp;#34;trick&amp;#34; questions and producing unrecognizable ASCII art &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594919&quot; title=&quot;1 bit with a FP16 scale factor every 128 bits. Fascinating that this works so well. I tried a few things with it. Got it driving Cursor, which in itself was impressive - it handled some tool usage. Via cursor I had it generate a few web page tests. On a monte carlo simulation of pi, it got the logic correct but failed to build an interface to start the test. Requesting changes mostly worked, but left over some symbols which caused things to fail. Required a bit of manual editing. Tried a Simon…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595212&quot; title=&quot;I must add that I also tried out the standard &amp;#39;should I walk or drive to the carwash 100 meters away for washing the car&amp;#39; and it made usual error or suggesting a walk given the distance and health reasons etc. But then this does not claim to be a reasoning model and I did not expect, in the remotest case, for this to be answered correctly. Ever previous generation larger reasoning models struggle with this&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Performance can be significantly improved through optimization; for instance, adding AVX2 support to the CPU kernel increased speeds from 0.6t/s to 12t/s on an older laptop &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595610&quot; title=&quot;Don&amp;#39;t have a GPU so tried the CPU option and got 0.6t/s on my old 2018 laptop using their llama.cpp fork. Then found out they didn&amp;#39;t implement AVX2 for their Q1_0_g128 CPU kernel. Added that and getting ~12t/s which isn&amp;#39;t shabby for this old machine. Cool model.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.greptile.com/blog/ai-slopware-future&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Slop is not necessarily the future&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (greptile.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47587953&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;210 points · &lt;strong&gt;359 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by dakshgupta&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Despite concerns that AI is flooding software with &amp;#34;slop,&amp;#34; economic incentives will likely drive models to produce high-quality, simple code because it is cheaper to generate, requires fewer tokens, and is easier for agents to maintain long-term. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.greptile.com/blog/ai-slopware-future&quot; title=&quot;Title: Slop Is Not Necessarily The Future    URL Source: https://www.greptile.com/blog/ai-slopware-future    Published Time: 2026-03-31T12:00:00    Markdown Content:  A couple of years ago, &amp;#39;slop&amp;#39; became the popular shorthand for unwanted, mindlessly generated AI content flooding the internet including images, text, and spam. Simon Willison helped popularize the term, though it had been circulating in engineering communities in the years prior.    At Greptile, we spend a lot of time thinking about…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on a divide between developers who view code as a &amp;#34;means to an end&amp;#34; to ship products quickly and those who view it as a craft essential to long-term quality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47591182&quot; title=&quot;I find most developers fall into one of two camps: 1. You treat your code as a means to an end to make a product for a user. 2. You treat the code itself as your craft, with the product being a vector for your craft. The people who typically have the most negative things to say about AI fall into camp #2 where AI is automating a large part of what they considered their art while enabling people in group #1 to iterate on their product faster. Personally, I fall into the first camp. No one has…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47591796&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; No one has ever made a purchasing decision based on how good your code is. absolutely false. &amp;gt; The general public does not care about anything other than the capabilities and limitations of your product. also false. People may not know that the reason they like your product is because the code is so good, but everyone likes software that is mostly free from bugs, performs extremely well, helps them do their work quickly, and is obviously created by people the care deeply about the quality of…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents of the &amp;#34;product-first&amp;#34; mindset argue that users prioritize utility over internal code quality and that AI-driven &amp;#34;vibe coding&amp;#34; enables faster iteration &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47591182&quot; title=&quot;I find most developers fall into one of two camps: 1. You treat your code as a means to an end to make a product for a user. 2. You treat the code itself as your craft, with the product being a vector for your craft. The people who typically have the most negative things to say about AI fall into camp #2 where AI is automating a large part of what they considered their art while enabling people in group #1 to iterate on their product faster. Personally, I fall into the first camp. No one has…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47591429&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m in camp 1 too. I&amp;#39;ve maintained projects developed with that mindset. It&amp;#39;s fine! Your job is to make the thing work, not take on its quality as part of your personal identity. If it&amp;#39;s harder to work with, it&amp;#39;s harder to work with, it&amp;#39;s not the end of the world. At least it exists, which it probably wouldn&amp;#39;t have if developed with &amp;#39;camp 2&amp;#39; tendencies. I think camp 2 would rather see one beautiful thing than ten useful things.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47591130&quot; title=&quot;People are not emotionally ready to accept that certain layers of abstraction don’t need as much care and effort if they can be automated. We are at the point where a single class can be dirty but the API of the classes should be clean. There’s no point reviewing the internals of a class anymore. I’m more or less sure that they would work as intended. Next step is that of a micro service itself. The api of that micro service should be clean but internals may be however. We are 10% here.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, critics contend that neglecting craftsmanship leads to a &amp;#34;parade of garbage software&amp;#34; that is buggy, slow, and difficult to maintain over its lifespan &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47591796&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; No one has ever made a purchasing decision based on how good your code is. absolutely false. &amp;gt; The general public does not care about anything other than the capabilities and limitations of your product. also false. People may not know that the reason they like your product is because the code is so good, but everyone likes software that is mostly free from bugs, performs extremely well, helps them do their work quickly, and is obviously created by people the care deeply about the quality of…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47591923&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The longer your product exists the more important the quality of the code will be. This obsession so many have with &amp;#39;get it out the door in 5 seconds&amp;#39; is only going to continue the parade of garbage software that is slow as a dog, and uses gigabytes of memory to perform simple tasks. Exactly.  A lot of devs optimizing for whether the feature is going to take a day or an hour, but not contemplating that it&amp;#39;s going to be out in the wild for 10 years either way.  Maybe do it well once.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47591385&quot; title=&quot;I respect your opinion and especially your honesty. And at the same time I hope that you will some day be forced to maintain a project written by someone else with that mindset. Cruel, yes. But unfortunately schadenfreude is a real thing - I must be honest too. I have gotten to old for ship now, ask questions later projects.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that high-quality engineering is simply about meeting requirements at the lowest cost &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47590417&quot; title=&quot;If &amp;#39;good code&amp;#39; == &amp;#39;useful code&amp;#39;, then yes. People forget that good engineering isn&amp;#39;t &amp;#39;the strongest bridge&amp;#39;, but the cheapest bridge that just barely won&amp;#39;t fail under conditions.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that many successful, billion-dollar platforms are notoriously complex and slow, suggesting the market does not always reward technical excellence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47592962&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; obviously created by people the care deeply about the quality of the product they produce This obviously doesn&amp;#39;t represent all of the billions of dollars spent on software like Salesforce, SAP, Realpage, Booking.com, etc. etc. (all notoriously buggy, slow, and complex software). You can&amp;#39;t tell me with a straight face that all of the thousands of developers who develop these products/services care deeply about the quality of the product. They get real nice paychecks, benefits and put dinner on…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/03/okcupid-match-pay-no-fine-for-sharing-user-photos-with-facial-recognition-firm/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OkCupid gave 3M dating-app photos to facial recognition firm, FTC says&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (arstechnica.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47591104&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;475 points · 93 comments · by whiteboardr&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OkCupid and Match Group settled with the FTC over allegations they shared 3 million user photos and location data with a facial recognition firm without consent; the companies will pay no financial penalty but are barred from misrepresenting their data privacy practices. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/03/okcupid-match-pay-no-fine-for-sharing-user-photos-with-facial-recognition-firm/&quot; title=&quot;Title: OkCupid gave 3 million dating-app photos to facial recognition firm, FTC says    URL Source: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/03/okcupid-match-pay-no-fine-for-sharing-user-photos-with-facial-recognition-firm/    Published Time: 2026-03-31T17:33:21+00:00    Markdown Content:  # OkCupid gave 3 million dating-app photos to facial recognition firm, FTC says - Ars Technica    Manage your consent preferences    If you are a resident of Colorado, Connecticut, Virginia, Utah, Oregon, Texas,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The consensus among commenters is that online services should be treated as inherently hostile, as companies will inevitably compromise user privacy for profit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47591680&quot; title=&quot;At this point, nearly every online service should be considered hostile. If they can make a small amount of money by compromising your privacy or your identity, they will. If they can make a small amount of money by stealing your attention and addicting you, they will. Are there exceptions? I&amp;#39;m sure. Will I be erring sometimes by being cautious? Definitely. But, there is really not much of an alternative these days.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594630&quot; title=&quot;My advice has long beem to delete every single account you&amp;#39;ve ever created on every platform. The chance of the data leaking nears 100% with time. The corporate cloud is a seriously unsafe place to be. It&amp;#39;s a dangerous place to store your intimate secrets and a shaky foundation on which to build a culture.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47592689&quot; title=&quot;I suspect that instead of them &amp;#39;giving&amp;#39; the photos to the facial recognition firm they sold them. Those photos and the PII data associated with them are the only things of value that a site like OKCupid controls.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest there is a market for privacy-focused apps, others argue that users can never truly trust a publisher&amp;#39;s claims and should instead withhold as much personal information as possible &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47591853&quot; title=&quot;I have long wondered about the market size for privacy-focused apps. Sure, plenty of people don&amp;#39;t know or don&amp;#39;t care to value that, but if there are enough, maybe you could have a whole set of apps that emphasize they are not seeking world domination or selling out to the highest bidder, and a major selling point for using them would be that they are not &amp;lt; your expected chat/dating/photo/social site &amp;gt;. Am I too idealistic? If such apps are not aggressively seeking hyper growth, it seems like…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47592185&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I have long wondered about the market size for privacy-focused apps. The real problem is how to trust that a &amp;#39;privacy-focused&amp;#39; app is actually privacy-focused. You certainly can&amp;#39;t take the publisher&amp;#39;s word for it. The only safe stance is to withhold as much personal information from as much software and services as possible.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47592371&quot; title=&quot;I’ve never posted information anywhere off a machine that I control unless I’m comfortable with it being sold or made public. Reduces anxiety.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion highlights a growing sense of &amp;#34;digital dark times&amp;#34; where data leaks are viewed as a statistical certainty over time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594630&quot; title=&quot;My advice has long beem to delete every single account you&amp;#39;ve ever created on every platform. The chance of the data leaking nears 100% with time. The corporate cloud is a seriously unsafe place to be. It&amp;#39;s a dangerous place to store your intimate secrets and a shaky foundation on which to build a culture.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47593806&quot; title=&quot;This sort of stuff continues to ramp up as everyone rushes to train LLMs while governments are pushing for ID verification that would make it impossible to use the web (or even one&amp;#39;s own computer) anonymously. It&amp;#39;s a very dark time for anyone who cares whatsoever about privacy or digital sovereignty.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/31/anthropic_claude_code_limits/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Claude Code users hitting usage limits &amp;#39;way faster than expected&amp;#39;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theregister.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47586176&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;328 points · 225 comments · by samizdis&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic is investigating reports that Claude Code users are exhausting their usage quotas significantly faster than expected, a problem potentially caused by recent policy changes, the end of a promotion, or software bugs that reportedly inflate token costs by up to 20 times. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/31/anthropic_claude_code_limits/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Anthropic admits Claude Code users hitting usage limits &amp;#39;way faster than expected&amp;#39;    URL Source: https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/31/anthropic_claude_code_limits/    Published Time: 2026-03-31T11:45:11Z    Markdown Content:  # Anthropic admits Claude Code quotas running out too fast • The Register    [The Register Home Page![Image 1](https://cdn.theregister.com/assets/images/the_register_logo.6befe899.svg)![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users report hitting Claude&amp;#39;s usage limits unexpectedly fast, leading to speculation that Anthropic is conducting &amp;#34;pricing experiments&amp;#34; or testing user tolerance for restrictive thresholds &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47587608&quot; title=&quot;Recently after noticing how quickly limits are consumed and reading others complaints about same issue on reddit I was wondering how much about this is real error or bug hidden somewhere and how much it&amp;#39;s about testing what threshold of constraining limits will be tolerated without cancelling accounts. Eventually, in case of &amp;#39;shit hits the fan&amp;#39; situation it can be always dismissed by waving hands and apologizing (or not) about some abstract &amp;#39;bug&amp;#39;. The lack of transparency and accountability…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47587677&quot; title=&quot;This feels a lot like the same playbook we’re seeing with dynamic pricing in retail, just applied to compute instead of products. You never really know what you’re getting, and the rules shift under you. What makes it worse is the lack of transparency. If there were clear, hard limits, people could plan around it. Instead it’s this moving target that makes it impossible to trust for real work. At some point it stops feeling like a bug and starts feeling like a pricing experiment on users.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47586634&quot; title=&quot;Yesterday (pro plan) I ran one small conversation in which Claude did one set of three web searches, a very small conversation with no web search, and I added a single prompt to an existing long conversation. I was shocked to see after the last prompt that I had somehow hit my limit until 5:00pm. This account is not connected to an IDE or Code, super confusing.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some attribute the issue to a specific cache invalidation bug discovered by reverse-engineering the binary &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47587509&quot; title=&quot;This turned out to be a bug. https://x.com/om_patel5/status/2038754906715066444?s=20 One reddit user reverse engineered the binary and found that it was a cache invalidation issue. They are doing some hidden string replacement if the claude code conversation talks about billing or tokens. Looks like that invalidates the cache at that point. If that string appears anywhere in the conversation history, I think the starting text is replaced,  your entire cache rebuilds from scratch. So, nothing…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others view the lack of transparency as part of a broader trend toward unpredictable dynamic pricing and corporate over-reliance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47587242&quot; title=&quot;Over reliance on LLMs is going to become such a disaster in a way no one would have thought possible. Not sure exactly what, who, when, or where.. Just that having your entire product or repo dependent on a single entity is going to lead to some bad times…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47587677&quot; title=&quot;This feels a lot like the same playbook we’re seeing with dynamic pricing in retail, just applied to compute instead of products. You never really know what you’re getting, and the rules shift under you. What makes it worse is the lack of transparency. If there were clear, hard limits, people could plan around it. Instead it’s this moving target that makes it impossible to trust for real work. At some point it stops feeling like a bug and starts feeling like a pricing experiment on users.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47592259&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s going to get much worse. We&amp;#39;re soon going to have enough data and compute (and are losing enough online privacy) to allow every company to apply personalized pricing down to the individual.  My local restaurant is going to know that I am willing to buy a burger for at most $4.57 and my neighbor is only willing to pay $2.91 for it, and they will have the ability to charge us individually. Every business is going to soak each of us us to the maximum extent that the data says they can.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. This frustration has prompted some to advocate for open-source models to ensure privacy and consistency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47587058&quot; title=&quot;please tell me if i&amp;#39;m crazy. i just refuse to use openai/google/anthropic subscriptions, i only use open source models with ZDR tokens. - i like privacy in my work, and i share when i wish. somehow we accepted that our prompts and work may be read and moderated by employees. would you accept people moderating what you write in excel, google docs, apple pages? - i want a consistent tool, not something that is quantised one day, slow one day, a different harness one day, stops randomly. - unless…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, or to suggest switching to competitors like Gemini &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47587338&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; on a single entity Contrary to the popular opinion here, there are other services beyond Claude Code. These usage limits might even prompt (har har) people to notice that Gemini is cheaper and often better.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://solvespace.com/webver.pl&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Open source CAD in the browser (Solvespace)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (solvespace.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47586614&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;370 points · 127 comments · by phkahler&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SolveSpace has released an experimental web-based version of its open-source CAD software, allowing users to run the desktop application directly in a browser via Emscripten. &lt;a href=&quot;https://solvespace.com/webver.pl&quot; title=&quot;Title: SolveSpace - Experimental Web Version    URL Source: https://solvespace.com/webver.pl    Published Time: Wed, 01 Apr 2026 05:02:59 GMT    Markdown Content:  EXPERIMENTAL WEB VERSION    SolveSpace is developed primarily as normal desktop software. It&amp;#39;s compact enough that it runs surprisingly well when compiled with emscripten for the browser, though. There is some speed penalty and there are many remaining bugs, but with smaller models the experience is often highly usable.    In keeping with the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While SolveSpace is praised as a lightweight tool for laser cutting, users note that development has slowed and it lacks rudimentary features like chamfers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47587868&quot; title=&quot;SolveSpace is a wonderfully different take on parametric CAD, but development has really slowed, and it seems fundamentally incapable of some pretty rudimentary features (like chamfers[0]). Dune 3D[1] seems like a pretty effective spiritual successor. 0: https://github.com/solvespace/solvespace/issues/149 1: https://dune3d.org/&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47587834&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been using FreeCad more and more, but solvespace has been a great, lightweight tool to design parts for laser cutting by SendCutSend/Oshcut. Neat that they got it working in the browser.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Many commenters suggest FreeCAD has become a robust, &amp;#34;Blender-like&amp;#34; alternative that is now capable of replacing commercial software like Fusion 360 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47588603&quot; title=&quot;FreeCAD doesn&amp;#39;t have the limitations of SolveSpace, and the UX is actually decent now. I moved to that.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47587913&quot; title=&quot;FreeCAD is amazing these days.  It has completely replaced my use of Autodesk Fusion 360 for woodworking projects.  It is capable and the UI is understandable.  Its feature depth is incredible. FreeCAD is becoming like Blender and Inkspace - incredibly robust and capable and equivalent in most cases to the commercial alternatives. I find the rendering side of things under developed though.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant debate regarding the future of CAD development, with some looking toward spiritual successors like Dune3D &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47587868&quot; title=&quot;SolveSpace is a wonderfully different take on parametric CAD, but development has really slowed, and it seems fundamentally incapable of some pretty rudimentary features (like chamfers[0]). Dune 3D[1] seems like a pretty effective spiritual successor. 0: https://github.com/solvespace/solvespace/issues/149 1: https://dune3d.org/&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47587973&quot; title=&quot;Dune3D uses SolveSpace behind the scene.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47588696&quot; title=&quot;Only for the constraint solver. Dune uses OCCT for the solid model.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt; or LLM-based tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47587979&quot; title=&quot;Does this use its own backend/engine? I&amp;#39;ve been working on LLM to CAD tool[0] and have realised there are so many backends and options to choose from. Since the realisation I&amp;#39;m trying to find the best representation for an LLM. I think OpenSCAD is currently the best and most feature complete choice, but I definitely need to dig a bit deeper. If anyone has any pointers I welcome them! [0]: https://GrandpaCAD.com&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, while others remain skeptical of &amp;#34;vibe coding&amp;#34; a geometric kernel &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47589914&quot; title=&quot;That people on this forum convinced themselves that it&amp;#39;s a reasonable take to vibe code a useful geometric kernel is profoundly depressing.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/google-research/timesfm&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Google&amp;#39;s 200M-parameter time-series foundation model with 16k context&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47583045&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;323 points · 109 comments · by codepawl&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google Research has released TimesFM 2.5, a 200M-parameter pretrained foundation model for time-series forecasting that supports context lengths up to 16k. The updated model features a new 30M quantile head for continuous forecasts and improved efficiency compared to its 500M-parameter predecessor. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/google-research/timesfm&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - google-research/timesfm: TimesFM (Time Series Foundation Model) is a pretrained time-series foundation model developed by Google Research for time-series forecasting.    URL Source: https://github.com/google-research/timesfm    Markdown Content:  # GitHub - google-research/timesfm: TimesFM (Time Series Foundation Model) is a pretrained time-series foundation model developed by Google Research for time-series forecasting. · GitHub    [Skip to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters debate whether a foundation model can reliably predict disparate datasets like egg prices and inflation, with some questioning the lack of explainable logic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47583189&quot; title=&quot;I somehow find the concept of a general time series model strange. How can the same model predict egg prices in Italy, and global inflation in a reliable way? And how would you even use this model, given that there are no explanations that help you trust where the prediction comes from…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47586104&quot; title=&quot;This seemed like a good answer at first.  But on further thought, images on the whole really do seem to have quite a bit more standard structure / &amp;#39;grammar&amp;#39; to exploit compared to arbitrary time-series.  Many images are of the world, where there is gravity so you might see preponderance of blobs at the bottom, or the repetitive types like people, animals, faces, eyes.  Wildly abstract images still have some continuity, pixels in a neighborhood are likely to be similar. Time series in general…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue these models merely decompose universal patterns like seasonality and trends &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47583261&quot; title=&quot;What is not generally understood is that these models don’t predict egg prices or inflation in Italy. They decompose a time series into trends, seasonality and residuals. That’s what they are actually modelling. They cannot predict wars in the Middle East influencing inflation unless there is a seasonal pattern(s).&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that neural networks capture complex, non-linear causal structures—such as human behavior and market psychology—that traditional statistical methods like ARIMA fail to model &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47585533&quot; title=&quot;Because traditional time-series modelling (ARIMA, GARCH, ...) is too &amp;#39;simple&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;strict&amp;#39;. Just like &amp;#39;simple&amp;#39; computer vision (OpenCV, edge-detection, ...) was crushed by neural networks when having to deal with real world images.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47586386&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s less clear to me how mixing sensor data / financial data / anything else together could be helpful. Because many of these have the same underlying causal structures - humans doing things, weather correlations, holidays. Well studied behavioral stuff like &amp;#39;the stock market takes the stairs up and the elevator down&amp;#39; which is not really captured by &amp;#39;traditional&amp;#39; modelling tools. I&amp;#39;m sure people will be doing mechanical interpretation on these models to extract what they pattern match for…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Skeptics maintain that the high entropy of the real world makes such forecasting inherently limited &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47583466&quot; title=&quot;Let me be blunt: Shannon would tell us that time forecasting is bullshit: There is infinitely more entropy in the real world out there than any model can even remotely capture. The world is not minecraft.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, while proponents compare the model&amp;#39;s generalized pattern recognition to how JPEG algorithms compress any image regardless of its specific content &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47583644&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; How can the same model predict egg prices in Italy, and global inflation in a reliable way? How can the same lossy compression algorithm (eg JPG) compress pictures of everything in a reliable way?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47588658&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tell HN: Chrome says &amp;quot;suspicious download&amp;quot; when trying to download yt-dlp&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47588658&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;310 points · 98 comments · by joering2&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google Chrome’s latest version is flagging downloads of the media-archiving tool yt-dlp as &amp;#34;suspicious&amp;#34; without providing a specific explanation for the warning. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47588658&quot; title=&quot;On a newest version, I attempted to download newest yt-dlp only to be warned of &amp;amp;quot;Suspicious Download&amp;amp;quot;. No explanation what that means was provided.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The flagging of yt-dlp is largely attributed to PyInstaller-related false positives and heuristic-based security systems that penalize less common binaries, creating a &amp;#34;chicken and egg&amp;#34; problem for niche or open-source software &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47589067&quot; title=&quot;The binaries they offer are complied using PyInstaller, which can give false positives in anti virus software.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47589826&quot; title=&quot;The heuristics powering this, as well as the Windows Defender whitelisting, are terrible. My understanding is that a specific binary needs to become popular for it to stop being flagged. This creates a chicken and egg problem. Users are not incentivized to use the program with the warning. But removing the warning requires many people to ignore the warning. This is a big problem for anyone writing Windows software. An indie developer or small open source project is not going to do well with…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47589271&quot; title=&quot;for what it is worth, when downloading the latest .exe from github, firefox says &amp;#39;this file is not commonly downloaded&amp;#39; and i have to select &amp;#39;allow download&amp;#39;. scans of it are fine. probably just a heuristic-based false-positive, and not a news-worthy story of chrome abusing their monopoly or whatever.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users view this as a deliberate attempt by Google to protect its video platform and control user content &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47589991&quot; title=&quot;Google has been anti yt-dlp before it was forked. They also have rules that carve out tools like this from their extension store and at Android, except enforcement is lacking sometimes. Google is terrified of users having access users control to their video content.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47588860&quot; title=&quot;So, Google&amp;#39;s browser says downloading a tool to download files from Google&amp;#39;s servers is &amp;#39;Suspicious&amp;#39;? Not surprising.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47589169&quot; title=&quot;By the same standard, Chrome itself is &amp;#39;a tool to download files from Google&amp;#39;s servers.&amp;#39; Chrome doesn&amp;#39;t only download from Google&amp;#39;s servers, but the same thing applies to yt-dlp. I&amp;#39;m equally not &amp;#39;surprised&amp;#39; by their bad behavior, but that shouldn&amp;#39;t stop us from condemning Google for unethically misleading people and engaging in browser monopoly abuse. --- EDIT: holding up (hilariously) RIAA lawyers as ethical role models only proves my point, thanks.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that Firefox displays similar warnings and note that Google has not pursued more aggressive legal options like DMCA takedowns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47589271&quot; title=&quot;for what it is worth, when downloading the latest .exe from github, firefox says &amp;#39;this file is not commonly downloaded&amp;#39; and i have to select &amp;#39;allow download&amp;#39;. scans of it are fine. probably just a heuristic-based false-positive, and not a news-worthy story of chrome abusing their monopoly or whatever.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47590272&quot; title=&quot;yt-dlp breaks YouTube’s DRM. They could easily get the repo removed under the DMCA. They don’t.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, the discussion highlights a growing frustration with how browser monopolies and automated security measures stifle independent software distribution &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47589826&quot; title=&quot;The heuristics powering this, as well as the Windows Defender whitelisting, are terrible. My understanding is that a specific binary needs to become popular for it to stop being flagged. This creates a chicken and egg problem. Users are not incentivized to use the program with the warning. But removing the warning requires many people to ignore the warning. This is a big problem for anyone writing Windows software. An indie developer or small open source project is not going to do well with…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47589169&quot; title=&quot;By the same standard, Chrome itself is &amp;#39;a tool to download files from Google&amp;#39;s servers.&amp;#39; Chrome doesn&amp;#39;t only download from Google&amp;#39;s servers, but the same thing applies to yt-dlp. I&amp;#39;m equally not &amp;#39;surprised&amp;#39; by their bad behavior, but that shouldn&amp;#39;t stop us from condemning Google for unethically misleading people and engaging in browser monopoly abuse. --- EDIT: holding up (hilariously) RIAA lawyers as ethical role models only proves my point, thanks.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47589055&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s over. The internet culture of the 20th and early 21st century has been appropriated for profit.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-03-30</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-03-30</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://notes.zachmanson.com/copilot-edited-an-ad-into-my-pr/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Copilot edited an ad into my PR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (notes.zachmanson.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47570269&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1601 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 641 comments · by pavo-etc&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GitHub Copilot reportedly inserted advertisements for itself and Raycast into a developer&amp;#39;s pull request description after being summoned to correct a simple typo. &lt;a href=&quot;https://notes.zachmanson.com/copilot-edited-an-ad-into-my-pr/&quot; title=&quot;Title: copilot edited an ad into my pr    URL Source: https://notes.zachmanson.com/copilot-edited-an-ad-into-my-pr/    Published Time: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 11:36:41 GMT    Markdown Content:  # notes: copilot edited an ad into my pr    [](https://notes.zachmanson.com/)    [Archive](https://notes.zachmanson.com/archive)[Meta](https://notes.zachmanson.com/meta)[Notes](https://notes.zachmanson.com/notes)[Posts](https://notes.zachmanson.com/posts)[Projects](https://notes.zachmanson.com/projects)    [Copilot Edited…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft has disabled &amp;#34;product tips&amp;#34; in Copilot-generated pull requests following backlash that these messages were intrusive advertisements &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47573233&quot; title=&quot;Tim from the Copilot coding agent team here. We&amp;#39;ve now disabled these tips in pull requests created by or touched by Copilot, so you won&amp;#39;t see this happen again for future PRs. We&amp;#39;ve been including product tips in PRs created by Copilot coding agent. The goal was to help developers learn new ways to use the agent in their workflow. But hearing the feedback here, and on reflection, this was the wrong judgement call. We won&amp;#39;t do something like this again.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47571336&quot; title=&quot;This &amp;#39;ad&amp;#39; is not exactly new. Looks like MS thinks it&amp;#39;s a &amp;#39;tip&amp;#39; rather than an ad. I don&amp;#39;t know if Raycast team even knows about this. https://github.com/PlagueHO/plagueho.github.io/pull/24#issue... Copilot has been adding &amp;#39;(emoji) (tip)&amp;#39; thing since May 2025. GitHub copilot was released in May 2025, so basically it has had an ad since beginning. There are 1.5m of these things in GitHub. https://github.com/search?q=%22%3C%21--+START+COPILOT+CODING... Here are some of them:…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users compare these messages to &amp;#34;Sent from my iPhone&amp;#34; signatures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47575570&quot; title=&quot;It’s not really ads, it’s more like &amp;#39;Sent from my iPhone&amp;#39;-style sentences at the end of PR texts.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue they serve as a useful signal to identify &amp;#34;lazy&amp;#34; submissions where the author failed to review the AI&amp;#39;s output &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47575427&quot; title=&quot;I actually love these ads and also the way Claude injects itself as a co-author. Seeing them is an easy signal to recognize work that was submitted by someone so lazy they couldn’t even edit the commit message. You can see the vibe coded PRs right away. I think we should continue encouraging AI-generated PRs to label themselves, honestly. I’m not against AI coding tools, but I would like to know when someone is trying to have the tool do all of their work for them.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47575587&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; […] and also the way Claude injects itself as a co-author. &amp;gt; Seeing them is an easy signal to recognize work that was submitted by someone so lazy they couldn’t even edit the commit message. You can see the vibe coded PRs right away. I was doing the opposite when using ChatGPT. Specifically manually setting the git commit author as ChatGPT complete with model used, and setting myself as committer. That way I (and everyone else) can see what parts of the code were completely written by…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a significant debate regarding accountability: some developers believe AI should be credited as a co-author for transparency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47575587&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; […] and also the way Claude injects itself as a co-author. &amp;gt; Seeing them is an easy signal to recognize work that was submitted by someone so lazy they couldn’t even edit the commit message. You can see the vibe coded PRs right away. I was doing the opposite when using ChatGPT. Specifically manually setting the git commit author as ChatGPT complete with model used, and setting myself as committer. That way I (and everyone else) can see what parts of the code were completely written by…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47575592&quot; title=&quot;The ads are annoying, and I&amp;#39;m glad Microsoft will stop doing it. One thing I do like, however, is how agents add themselves as co-authors in commit messages. Having a signal for which commits are by hand and which are by agent is very useful, both for you and in aggregate (to see how well you are wielding AI, and the quality of the code being generated). Even when I edit the commit message, I still leave in the Claude co-author note. AI coding is a new skill that we&amp;#39;re all still figuring out,…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, while others argue the human submitter must take full responsibility for the code regardless of its origin &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576002&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Why would I commit something written by AI with myself as author?&amp;#39; Because you&amp;#39;re the one who decided to take responsibility for it, and actually choose to PR it in its ultimate form. What utility do the reviews/maintainers get from you marking whats written by you vs. chatgpt? Other than your ability to scapegoat the LLM? The only thing that actually affects me (the hypothetical reviewer) and the project is the quality of the actual code, and, ideally, the presence of a contributer (you) who…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nbailey.ca/post/router/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How to turn anything into a router&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nbailey.ca)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47574034&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;773 points · 261 comments · by yabones&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In response to potential U.S. router import bans, this guide explains how to convert any Linux-capable computer into a functional router using Debian, basic networking hardware, and open-source tools like `hostapd`, `dnsmasq`, and `nftables` for DHCP, DNS, and firewall management. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nbailey.ca/post/router/&quot; title=&quot;Title: How to turn anything into a router    URL Source: https://nbailey.ca/post/router/    Published Time: 2026-03-27T21:19:47-04:00    Markdown Content:  [](https://mstdn.ca/@nbailey)# How to turn anything into a router    [Noah…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights that any computer with a network interface can function as a router by leveraging Linux kernel features like NAT and VLANs, which allow for sophisticated network isolation on minimal hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47574408&quot; title=&quot;A router only really needs one network interface. Any computer with a single network interface, maybe even an (old) laptop, can be used. Anything x86 from at least the last 10 years is energy efficient and fast enough to route at gigabit speed. If you don&amp;#39;t care about energy usage, any x86-based computer from the last 20 years is fast enough. The magic trick is to use VLANs, which require switches that support VLANs, which can be had for cheap. VLANS also allows you to create separate isolated…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47574787&quot; title=&quot;Lots of &amp;#39;just use X&amp;#39; comments but the article is about showing the bare minimum/how easy the core part of routing actually is. Also, if you have ever used docker or virtual machines with NAT routing (often the default), you&amp;#39;ve done exactly the same things. If you have ever enabled the wifi hotspot on an android phone also, you&amp;#39;ve done pretty much what the article describes on your phone. All of these use the same Linux kernel features under the hood. In fact there is a good chance this message…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47577919&quot; title=&quot;Basically any computer is a router if you&amp;#39;re brave enough. Windows PCs had (have?) that Internet connection sharing feature for a long time.  It was really just a checkbox to enable NAT too. Sometimes I think combining a firewall/router/switch/AP/file server/etc into a device called a &amp;#39;router&amp;#39; really confuses people.  Even people who should know better.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users prefer the convenience and advanced security features of dedicated web interfaces like OPNsense, others argue that these GUI abstractions can be confusing and restrictive compared to direct command-line configuration &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47574625&quot; title=&quot;I’ve been using OpnSense/pfsense [0] for years and would highly recommend it. It has a great automatic update experience, config backups, builtin wireguard tunnels and advanced features like packet filtering options via suricata. When I am doing network management on my weekends, I’m so glad I’m not stuck in the Linux terminal learning about networking internals and can instead just go to a webui and configure my router. 0: https://opnsense.org/&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47574854&quot; title=&quot;I agree on principal, but I often find that the GUI abstractions don&amp;#39;t always map to the linux tooling/terminology/concepts, which often ends with a head bashing against the wall thinking &amp;#39;this is linux, I know it can do it, and I can do it by hand, but what is this GUI trying to conceptualize?!?!&amp;#39; I was recently introduced to a Barracuda router, and bashed my head against the wall long enough to discover it had an ssh interface, and linux userland, and was able to solve my immediate problem by…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. The thread also reflects on the historical utility of repurposing obsolete hardware for routing, noting that even decades-old machines are often fast enough for modern gigabit speeds &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47574408&quot; title=&quot;A router only really needs one network interface. Any computer with a single network interface, maybe even an (old) laptop, can be used. Anything x86 from at least the last 10 years is energy efficient and fast enough to route at gigabit speed. If you don&amp;#39;t care about energy usage, any x86-based computer from the last 20 years is fast enough. The magic trick is to use VLANs, which require switches that support VLANs, which can be had for cheap. VLANS also allows you to create separate isolated…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47575275&quot; title=&quot;This really takes me back. My first actual &amp;#39;use&amp;#39; for Linux was making routers out of leftover computers. The perfect machine back then was a 100MHz Pentium, in a slimline desktop case. At the time, the Pentium III was the current desktop chip, so you&amp;#39;d have a pile of early Pentium-class machines to use. And even a 10mb ISA network card (3Com if possible) would have plenty of power for the internet connections of the day. But 100mb PCI cards were still fairly cheap. Install two NICs, load your…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alexhwoods.com/dont-let-ai-write-for-you/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Do your own writing&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (alexhwoods.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47573519&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;743 points · 241 comments · by karimf&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alex Woods argues against using AI to write documents, asserting that the process of writing is essential for developing deep understanding, building personal credibility, and strengthening critical thinking skills. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alexhwoods.com/dont-let-ai-write-for-you/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Don&amp;#39;t Let AI Write For You    URL Source: https://alexhwoods.com/dont-let-ai-write-for-you/    Markdown Content:  # Don&amp;#39;t Let AI Write For You    [Alex Woods](https://alexhwoods.com/)    [About](https://alexhwoods.com/about)    ESC    *   [2026.03 Don&amp;#39;t Let AI Write For You](https://alexhwoods.com/dont-let-ai-write-for-you)  *   [2025.10 Go does not allow truthiness](https://alexhwoods.com/go-does-not-allow-truthiness)  *   [2025.10 Tightening Constraints in…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While many users view writing as the &amp;#34;last step in thinking&amp;#34; that reveals contradictions and consolidates ideas &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47578515&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve long considered writing to be the &amp;#39;last step in thinking&amp;#39;. I can&amp;#39;t tell you how many times an idea, that was crystal clear in my mind, fell apart the moment I started writing and I realize there were major contradictions I needed to resolve. Likewise I also have numerous times where writing about something loosely and casually revealed to me something that fundamentally changed how I viewed a topic and really consolidated my thinking. However, there is a lot of writing that is basically…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that AI is better suited for &amp;#34;ritual&amp;#34; writing like release notes or context dumps that humans find tedious to produce and consume &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47578515&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve long considered writing to be the &amp;#39;last step in thinking&amp;#39;. I can&amp;#39;t tell you how many times an idea, that was crystal clear in my mind, fell apart the moment I started writing and I realize there were major contradictions I needed to resolve. Likewise I also have numerous times where writing about something loosely and casually revealed to me something that fundamentally changed how I viewed a topic and really consolidated my thinking. However, there is a lot of writing that is basically…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47580091&quot; title=&quot;For your context, I&amp;#39;m an AI hater, so understand my assumptions as such. &amp;gt; The obvious best solution is to have your agent write release notes for your agent in the future to have context. No more tedious writing or reading, but also no missing context. Why is more AI the &amp;#39;obvious&amp;#39; best solution here? If nobody wants to read your release notes, then why write them? And if they&amp;#39;re going to slim them down with their AI anyway, then why not leave them terse? It sounds like you&amp;#39;re just handwaving…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant debate over using LLMs for &amp;#34;rubber ducking&amp;#34;; some find them useful for identifying edge cases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47578669&quot; title=&quot;I have found the one of the better use cases of llms to be a rubber duck. Explaining a design, problem, etc and trying to find solutions is extremely useful. I can bring novelty, what I often want from the LLM is a better understanding of the edge cases that I may run into, and possible solutions.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47579006&quot; title=&quot;Sometimes I don&amp;#39;t want creativity though, I&amp;#39;m just not familiar enough with the solution space and I use the LLM as a sort of gradient descent simulator to the right solution to my problem (the LLM which itself used gradient descent when trained, meta, I know). I am not looking for wholly new solutions, just one that fits the problem the best, just as one could Google that information but LLMs save even that searching time.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, while critics argue that LLMs lack true comprehension and that genuine rubber ducking requires explaining ideas to oneself rather than a conversational agent &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47578863&quot; title=&quot;I always find folks bringing up rubber ducking as a thing LLMs are good at to be misguided. IMO, what defines rubber ducking as a concept is that it is just the developer explaining what their doing to themselves. Not to another person, and not to a thing pretending to be a person. If you have a &amp;#39;two way&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;conversational&amp;#39; debugging/designing experience it isnt rubber ducking, its just normal design/debugging. The moment I bring in a conversational element, I want a being that actually has…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47581620&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I&amp;#39;m just not familiar enough with the solution space Neither is the LLM&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, some suggest the focus should be on &amp;#34;not letting AI think for you,&amp;#34; noting that alternative methods like dictation can be more effective than writing for capturing thought processes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47578488&quot; title=&quot;The title and of this article is Don&amp;#39;t Let AI Write For You , when its point seems to be closer to Don&amp;#39;t Let AI Think For You (see &amp;#39;Thinking&amp;#39;). This distinction is important, because (1) writing is not the only way to faciliate thinking, and (2) writing is not neccessarily even the best way to facilitate thinking. It&amp;#39;s definitely not the best way (a) for everyone, (b) in every situation. Audio can be a great way to capture ideas and thought processes. Rod Serling wrote predominantly through…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.sambent.com/the-white-house-app-has-huawei-spyware-and-an-ice-tip-line/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Fedware: Government apps that spy harder than the apps they ban&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sambent.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47577761&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;682 points · 281 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A new report reveals that numerous U.S. government apps, including those from the White House and FBI, utilize invasive tracking SDKs and excessive permissions to collect biometric data, precise locations, and device information that often feeds into a broader federal surveillance pipeline. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.sambent.com/the-white-house-app-has-huawei-spyware-and-an-ice-tip-line/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Fedware: 13 Government Apps That Spy Harder Than the Apps They Ban    URL Source: https://www.sambent.com/the-white-house-app-has-huawei-spyware-and-an-ice-tip-line/    Published Time: 2026-03-28T18:17:42.000Z    Markdown Content:  [surveillance](https://www.sambent.com/404/)  The White House app ships with a sanctioned Chinese tracking SDK, the FBI app serves ads, and FEMA wants 28 permissions to show you weather alerts.    [![Image 1:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters expressed alarm at the invasive nature of &amp;#34;Fedware,&amp;#34; noting that native apps are often chosen over web pages specifically to bypass browser privacy restrictions and access sensitive device APIs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47578865&quot; title=&quot;The closing point is the one that should get more attention — every single one of these apps could be replaced by a web page. And from a product standpoint, there&amp;#39;s really only one reason to ship a native app when your content is just press releases and weather alerts: you want access to APIs  the browser won&amp;#39;t give you. Background location, biometrics, device identity, boot triggers — none of that is available through a browser, and that&amp;#39;s by, unfortunately, design.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion highlighted the &amp;#34;cringe&amp;#34; and propagandistic elements of these apps, with some comparing the tactics to those used in North Korea &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47578630&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This thing also has a &amp;#39;Text the President&amp;#39; button that auto-fills your message with &amp;#39;Greatest President Ever!&amp;#39; and then collects your name and phone number. when is the onion going to go bankrupt? it has to be soon, i imagine. no way it can compete with reality at this point. (the rest of the article is a bit too depressing for me to comment on at the moment, other than saying &amp;#39;wow, gross&amp;#39;)&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47581146&quot; title=&quot;How can people see the propaganda that happens in, say, North Korea, but fail to see what is happening in their own country? It boggles.  It truly does.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users debated whether the hoarding of extreme wealth is correlated with mental illness or simply an extension of universal human nature, others criticized the article&amp;#39;s AI-generated aesthetic for being distracting and potentially unreliable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47578719&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s ming boggling just how....cringe... these billionaires that want to run the world are. Makes you wonder if the personas that seek billions are correlated strongly with mental illnesses.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47578796&quot; title=&quot;I do not think it is the money that made them terrible.  I know all sorts of terrible people that would do the exact same things.  The only difference really is they do not have the money to execute on those ideas. Money does not make you a good or bad person.  It just makes you more of who you are already.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47579403&quot; title=&quot;Huge numbers (billions) of people have enough money to make massive changes to the lives of those less fortunate than them, but don&amp;#39;t, and prefer instead to make incremental upgrades to their own lives. New rugs, more savings, first-class airline tickets, eating out a few more times a month, etc. This is just human nature. People who are at wealth level x tend to say, &amp;#39;I can&amp;#39;t believe that people at wealth level x+1 aren&amp;#39;t more generous!&amp;#39; all the while ignoring their own lack of desire to give…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47578770&quot; title=&quot;Do these posts just get upvoted due to the graphics/animations? I find this site incredibly difficult to read with things re-playing as you scroll up and down and the articles I&amp;#39;ve read from here are often light on details. The graphics seem very AI-generated (overlapping text and other little issues) which makes me think the whole thing is from an LLM. While this post does have some interesting information, I have to wade through distracting animations that seem &amp;#39;off&amp;#39; which makes me questions…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://martinvol.pe/blog/2026/03/30/how-the-ai-bubble-bursts/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How the AI Bubble Bursts&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (martinvol.pe)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47573420&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;371 points · &lt;strong&gt;521 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by martinvol&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The AI bubble faces a potential burst as rising energy costs, drying venture capital, and massive infrastructure expenses force labs like OpenAI and Anthropic to consider exits or price hikes, threatening market valuations and the broader economy despite the technology&amp;#39;s long-term productivity benefits. &lt;a href=&quot;https://martinvol.pe/blog/2026/03/30/how-the-ai-bubble-bursts/&quot; title=&quot;Title: How the AI bubble bursts    URL Source: https://martinvol.pe/blog/2026/03/30/how-the-ai-bubble-bursts/    Published Time: 2026-03-30T00:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  # How the AI bubble bursts | Volpe’s Blog    [Home](https://martinvol.pe/)[About](https://martinvol.pe/about/)[Blog](https://martinvol.pe/blog/)    # [Volpe&amp;#39;s Blog](https://martinvol.pe/blog/)    My points of view, travels and code    en    # How the AI bubble bursts     March 30, 2026 ·[🇪🇸 Leer en…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are sharply divided on whether the AI boom is a sustainable &amp;#34;step change&amp;#34; or a speculative bubble, with some arguing that token inference is already profitable while others maintain that massive R&amp;amp;D and capex costs make the business model unsustainable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47573796&quot; title=&quot;It’s incredible how polarizing the AI rush is. I keep the perspective that the technology is an absolute step change but I have no idea where the cards will fall. I take a lot of issue with these style of articles. I get a sense that the authors are being overly defensive. The cost to serve tokens is absolutely profitable today and that’s been true for at least a year. What’s unclear is how R&amp;amp;D and capex fit into the picture. I am not that pessimistic on this front either though. For the data…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47573716&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; nobody is sure if even their metered pricing is profitable This is most likely wrong. Lab executives insist that serving tokens is profitable. It&amp;#39;s the cost of training next-gen models that requires them to keep raising ever larger rounds. More importantly, many independent providers price tokens of open-weight models at a fraction of Anthropic&amp;#39;s prices.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47573901&quot; title=&quot;This article tries to build upon a lot of half-truths or incorrect facts, like this: &amp;gt; OpenAI is struggling to monetize. They turned to showing ads in ChatGPT, The ads aren’t going into your paid plans (except maybe a highly discounted tier, depending on the market). The ads are a play to offer a free version. Having an ad-supported free tier isn’t new. The discussion about being unprofitable also repeats the reductionist view that these companies are losing money and therefore the business…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47573888&quot; title=&quot;This is a classic HN mistaking the map for the territory.  R&amp;amp;D and capex absolutely figure into de-facto profitability and sustainability for AI labs, despite their separate treatment in accounting. &amp;gt; well most of us here on HN have benefited from decades of overinflated engineering salaries being paid by often companies that were not profitable and not only unprofitable This is a really concerning perspective: people were paid what they were worth.  Software is or was one of the few remaining…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics point to factual inaccuracies in the linked article regarding RAM prices and OpenAI&amp;#39;s monetization as evidence of an overly defensive, &amp;#34;anti-AI&amp;#34; bias &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47573873&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;  RAM prices are crashing because new models won’t need as much Reality begs to differ [0] and following the link for that text goes to an article [1] where they talk about Google&amp;#39;s TurboQuant which supposedly will lower the RAM requirements. Now if that means RAM prices come down (as speculated, not reported on, in the link) or the AI companies just do more things with their extra ram is yet to be determined. The fact this article links there with text &amp;#39;RAM prices are crashing&amp;#39; throws the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47573901&quot; title=&quot;This article tries to build upon a lot of half-truths or incorrect facts, like this: &amp;gt; OpenAI is struggling to monetize. They turned to showing ads in ChatGPT, The ads aren’t going into your paid plans (except maybe a highly discounted tier, depending on the market). The ads are a play to offer a free version. Having an ad-supported free tier isn’t new. The discussion about being unprofitable also repeats the reductionist view that these companies are losing money and therefore the business…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see skyrocketing demand for tokens as a sign of a healthy market, skeptics argue this demand may be artificial or nearing saturation, potentially leading to a &amp;#34;bust&amp;#34; if the technology fails to provide concrete value beyond replacing human labor &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47573895&quot; title=&quot;Demand of tokens is absolutely skyrocketing. And unlike the traditional &amp;#39;this will replace humans right away&amp;#39;, I think what this introduce is a lot of incentive to spread those token in places where there was never any incentive to hire a software engineer for previously. In turn, that will drive a lot of business activity in those area that will potentially fail given the current quality of the output. This feels like a boom before bust scenario, and I&amp;#39;m not even sure if it will bust.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47574109&quot; title=&quot;Tulips sales also skyrocketed. Seriously, what value are tokens providing other than justifying layoffs. Concretely. Today. Not in the speculating scenario that cardiologist could be replaced with models. We see this new trend of agentic coding, again a promise software will be written that way going forward, despite the number of fiasco already experienced when trusting a model turned bad. The use case may provide value, but right now all it does is fullfil the push for token consumption all…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47574216&quot; title=&quot;Jevons paradox only applies if demand hasnt already been saturated. The fact that public LLM usage is leveling off at a price of $0 and Jensen &amp;#39;we make the shovels in this gold rush&amp;#39; Huang is rather desperately claiming that you need to spend $250k/year in tokens to be taken seriously suggests that demand saturation may not be that far off. Whether Jevons&amp;#39; Paradox applies to software engineers I think is another open question. Im constantly being told that it doesnt and that LLMs make half of…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.codingfont.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;CodingFont: A game to help you pick a coding font&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (codingfont.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47575403&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;493 points · 237 comments · by nvahalik&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CodingFont is an interactive tool that helps developers select their ideal programming typeface by comparing different fonts side-by-side using real code snippets. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.codingfont.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title:     URL Source: https://www.codingfont.com/    Markdown Content:  [](https://www.codingfont.com/)    [Game](https://www.codingfont.com/)[Browse](https://www.codingfont.com/browse)[Studio](https://typogram.co/studio/)    Restart Game    ABC abc 123    ABC abc 123    ABC abc 123    ABC abc 123    ABC abc 123    ABC abc 123    ABC abc 123    ABC abc 123    ABC abc 123    ABC abc 123    ABC abc 123    ABC abc 123    ABC abc 123    ABC abc 123    ABC abc 123    ABC abc 123    ABC abc 123    ABC abc 123    ABC abc 123    ABC abc 123    ABC abc…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a strong divide over font aesthetics, with some users recommending playful or &amp;#34;cute&amp;#34; options like Maple Mono, Lotion, and Comic Shanns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47578385&quot; title=&quot;Knowing that everything in here is people asking why their font is missing:  I highly recommend having a look at [  MAPLE MONO  ] (on Github https://github.com/subframe7536/Maple-font ).  It has amazing readability, looks nice, is compatible with NF if you use that.  I received compliments from people looking over my shoulder for my f&amp;#39;ing font?!  Huge shoutout to subframe7536 ^^&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576132&quot; title=&quot;My coding font is comic-shanns-mono, here&amp;#39;s how it looks: https://github.com/jesusmgg/comic-shanns-mono?tab=readme-ov-...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47578526&quot; title=&quot;While we&amp;#39;re dropping lesser-known coding fonts, here&amp;#39;s my favorite, Lotion [0]. It&amp;#39;s cute and playful but also very legible and clean. [0] https://font.nina.coffee/&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, while others find such styles amateurish &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47579597&quot; title=&quot;I don’t like it. It looks amateurish in the same way Comic Sans looks to me. I suppose you’d love this if you also enjoy Comic Sans.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant point of contention is the use of ligatures; some developers find them distracting &amp;#34;monkey business,&amp;#34; though others note they can often be disabled via terminal configurations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47578956&quot; title=&quot;Going through this, I was introduced to &amp;lt;= being converted to a ligature which immediately ruled it as a nope for me. No monkey business with the characters of my code thank you very much.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47579003&quot; title=&quot;That is usually configurable at the terminal level- for example, both wezterm and ghostty have available configs to control this behavior.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47579066&quot; title=&quot;Good to know. I’ve been using ghostty and generally not a fan of the code ligatures (or just too stubborn to adapt!).&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. When evaluating fonts, users focus on specific character rendering—particularly &amp;#34;m&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;r&amp;#34;—and the ability to customize metrics for high-density or high-readability displays &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47577943&quot; title=&quot;Berkeley Mono, Iosevka, and Cascadia Code are missing which are my favorite fonts. The game handed me Roboto Mono instead. What I noticed while playing was that when fonts are similar, I really pay attention to the rendering of &amp;#39;m&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;r&amp;#39;. When they look off, the whole font looks off to me.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576156&quot; title=&quot;As I get older I prefer the text on my screen to be bigger than usual. Most websites tend to have super small fonts for some reason. For coding I much prefer fonts that are bold and easier to read. Who actually likes these whimsical cursive looking comments or super thin looking fonts? I ended up with &amp;#39;Roboto Mono&amp;#39; btw.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576415&quot; title=&quot;I stopped looking for fonts after I got comfortable tweaking the metric settings of Iosevka. My current setup exports a set of really compressed cuts (more compressed than Pragmata Pro) which I&amp;#39;ve always found hard to come by.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/03/android-developer-verification-rolling-out-to-all-developers.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Android Developer Verification&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (android-developers.googleblog.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47580297&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;326 points · 335 comments · by ingve&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google is rolling out mandatory developer verification across the Play Console and Android Developer Console to combat malware, requiring apps to be registered by verified developers to maintain standard installation experiences on certified devices starting in late 2026. &lt;a href=&quot;https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/03/android-developer-verification-rolling-out-to-all-developers.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Android developer verification: Rolling out to all developers on Play Console and Android Developer Console    URL Source: https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/03/android-developer-verification-rolling-out-to-all-developers.html    Published Time: Sat, 04 Apr 2026 22:45:28 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Android Developers Blog: Android developer verification: Rolling out to all developers on Play Console and Android Developer Console    [![Image 2: Android Developers…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google&amp;#39;s developer verification process is criticized as a fragmented, &amp;#34;unpolished&amp;#34; experience that requires redundant identity and business documentation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47580937&quot; title=&quot;The Android verification is such a broken experience. Recently I decided to purchase a dev account for my company, so far: 1) Provided my company DUNS number etc. once to create the payment profile. I did this some times ago, don’t remember the details but it was an involved verification process and it is marked as verified business payment profile. 2) Later on the payment step verified myself with a passport and bank statement to be able to actually pay with a proper HSBC bank card. Not shady…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47581446&quot; title=&quot;If this is a business account why do they want your passport? And why are you paying with a personal bank card rather than a business one? Or do I misunderstand?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47581763&quot; title=&quot;They may want proof that you, the human filling out this form, are authorized to publish apps, communications, etc. as the company you say you represent.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue these security measures are necessary to combat the high rate of malware found in sideloaded apps, others contend that the Google Play Store itself remains heavily infected with &amp;#34;crapware&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47581785&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; However, our recent analysis found over 90 times more malware from sideloaded sources than on Google Play Google has seemingly never seen an elderly person&amp;#39;s phone, where it is completely infected with crap including literal popup ads (that somehow overlay other apps), yet all of it was downloaded from GPlay.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47582465&quot; title=&quot;Both things might be true. Sideloaded apps are probably way more likely to be malicious, but also most installed malware/crapware is quite likely coming from Google Play.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47581326&quot; title=&quot;Don&amp;#39;t love it but (1) it&amp;#39;s addressing a serious problem and I&amp;#39;m not sure what the alternative is and (2) if you all remember the starting place, it was staggeringly, dramatically worse, practically a death sentence for F-Droid and seemingly testing the waters for if they could simply power through and do it despite objection. This is a major course correction that doesn&amp;#39;t kill F-Droid. A one time 24 hour hoop to jump through and then never again is monumentally better than losing F-Droid…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Long-time users express frustration that Android is abandoning its open-source roots, leading to calls for government regulation or a migration to deGoogled and Linux-based mobile alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47580691&quot; title=&quot;What % of Android users actually want this? Do they know or care? I&amp;#39;ve been using Android since 2010 because it was open in ways that the Apple ecosystem wasn&amp;#39;t. I do not want this and imagine hardly any other power users (for lack of a better term) do. I&amp;#39;m already using a mostly deGoogled device but this really seals the deal. I have been longing for a true Linux phone for years and now seems like a good time to get serious about the search and migration plan.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47580785&quot; title=&quot;Being able to side load apps was why I switched to android 10 years ago&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47580554&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t see a way out of this except government regulation. The EU has the most motivation to do it, as a huge economic bloc with a lot of motivation right now to become as independent from the US as possible. I guess I can sort of manage to keep my head above water and keep buying secondhand phones which I unlock and install a supported version of LineageOS. But it&amp;#39;s cumbersome, it gets more difficult and more restrictive every time. And I literally have a doctorate in computers for crying out…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://anishathalye.com/macbook-touchscreen/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Turning a MacBook into a touchscreen with $1 of hardware (2018)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (anishathalye.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47578572&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;408 points · 234 comments · by HughParry&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Researchers developed &amp;#34;Project Sistine,&amp;#34; a proof-of-concept that turns a MacBook into a touchscreen using a $1 mirror and computer vision to track finger reflections via the built-in webcam. &lt;a href=&quot;https://anishathalye.com/macbook-touchscreen/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Turning a MacBook into a Touchscreen with $1 of Hardware    URL Source: https://anishathalye.com/macbook-touchscreen/    Published Time: Sat, 27 Sep 2025 14:49:01 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Turning a MacBook into a Touchscreen with $1 of Hardware    [Anish Athalye](https://anishathalye.com/)[Blog](https://anishathalye.com/)[Projects](https://github.com/anishathalye)[Research](https://anish.io/)    # Turning a MacBook into a Touchscreen with $1 of Hardware    3 Apr 2018 — shared on [Hacker…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion reveals a strong divide over the utility of touchscreens on MacBooks, with many users citing Steve Jobs’ 2010 warning that vertical touch surfaces are ergonomically &amp;#34;terrible&amp;#34; and cause arm fatigue &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47581678&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;We&amp;#39;ve done tons of user testing on this, and it turns out it doesn&amp;#39;t work. Touch surfaces don&amp;#39;t want to be vertical. It gives great demo but after a short period of time, you start to fatigue and after an extended period of time, your arm wants to fall off. it doesn&amp;#39;t work, it&amp;#39;s ergonomically terrible.&amp;#39; -Steve Jobs, 2010 https://www.businessinsider.com/steve-jobs-touch-screen-mac-...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47579542&quot; title=&quot;Touch screens are not pleasant for laptops. I prefer not to have them.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that macOS is already optimized for keyboard commands to avoid reaching for the screen &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47579511&quot; title=&quot;I wouldn&amp;#39;t want a touchscreen MBP even if it was free, anyone else feel similar? I don&amp;#39;t get the draw - we already optimize for keyboard commands to avoid living our fingers over to a touchpad.  Why would I want to start clicking on my screen? If you&amp;#39;re using your computer for tasks (rather than entertainment) and you&amp;#39;re not a visual designer, I don&amp;#39;t get why Apple are apparently going to be putting them into the new MBP line later this year.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47579881&quot; title=&quot;Huh? Of all the wonky shit about my Mac, the flawless keyboard navigation is really none of that&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the operating system&amp;#39;s keyboard navigation is &amp;#34;third class&amp;#34; and lacks intuitive window management compared to iPadOS or Windows &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47579619&quot; title=&quot;Macs are definitely not optimized for keyboard commands. If you feel the software you use is keyboard optimized, odds are it&amp;#39;s not really Mac software.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47579904&quot; title=&quot;“Flawless” is absolutely the opposite of how I’d describe the third class keyboard navigation in MacOS. It’s actually more intuitive to use a magic keyboard on the iPad than on the desktop OS.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47581114&quot; title=&quot;I have a lot of complaints but I would say my three big gripes are: - Window navigation within (rather than between) open programs. Mainly if one is on an external monitor, this is just a nightmare and I end up using expose and clicking the window instead. - Window positioning (I installed 3rd party software called Rectangle for this last year so it’s kind of solved but if we’re talking about the vanilla experience this is a big one) - Having to switch focus to the dock and navigate one by one…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite occasional muscle memory leading users to touch their laptop screens after using iPads, there is skepticism regarding long-standing rumors that Apple will ever officially integrate the technology into the MacBook line &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47579677&quot; title=&quot;Sometimes, if I’ve been using my iPad for awhile and switch over to my MBP, I might reach out and touch the screen out of habit.  I can’t be the only one.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47579538&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I don&amp;#39;t get why Apple are apparently going to be putting them into the new MBP line later this year. Apple has apparently being going to put a touchscreen in a laptop every year since the iPad came out, and it&amp;#39;s never materialized.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.inquirer.com/news/philadelphia/smart-glasses-ai-meta-courts-20260326.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Philly courts will ban all smart eyeglasses starting next week&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (inquirer.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47569471&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;416 points · 210 comments · by Philadelphia&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Starting Monday, Philadelphia courts will ban all smart eyewear with recording capabilities to protect witnesses and jurors from intimidation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.inquirer.com/news/philadelphia/smart-glasses-ai-meta-courts-20260326.html&quot; title=&quot;Philly courts will ban all smart eyeglasses starting next week    The First Judicial District of Pennsylvania said the rule is designed to protect witnesses and jurors from intimidation.    [Skip to content](#article-body)    Advertisement    Tuesday, March 31, 2026    [Today&amp;#39;s Paper](https://eedition.inquirer.com/)|[Newsletters](https://www.inquirer.com/newsletters/)    Sign In / Sign Up    Sign in[**SUBSCRIBE**    Special offer](https://www.inquirer.com/subscribe_today/)    Keep reading by creating a **free**…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The ban on smart glasses in Philadelphia courts has sparked debate over the balance between privacy and accessibility, with some arguing the devices are intrusive &amp;#34;spy devices&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47569669&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t see how these glasses are legal at all. While filming in public places is allowed in the US, commercial use of that material is not. For  example, you cannot just use public material with recognizable people in advertisements without their consent. Meta is likely to use material from these spy devices to build real world networks and use it commercially. These &amp;#39;glasses&amp;#39; should be outlawed. The only useful purpose is to immediately identify the wearer as an asshole.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; while others highlight their essential use for real-time captioning for the hearing impaired &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47573742&quot; title=&quot;My dad wears smart glasses because he&amp;#39;s nearly deaf and the classes show captions for the person he&amp;#39;s talking to.  They&amp;#39;re great.  He doesn&amp;#39;t use or care at all about the camera.  Having the captions would be very useful to him in a courtroom setting.  Collateral damage I guess.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters expressed skepticism regarding government surveillance in legal settings, noting that even when officials promise not to listen to privileged communications, trust remains low &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47569771&quot; title=&quot;My local county is currently in a dispute with the local bar association because they want to upgrade the courthouse security cameras and the sheriff wants to add audio capabilities. This includes to parts of the building just outside the courtroom that counsel will frequently use for brief asides with their clients (due to lack of other private rooms). The county seems to favor adding the microphones and pinky swearing they won&amp;#39;t use them and that public records requests won&amp;#39;t be used to…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47570468&quot; title=&quot;I assume the sheriff would be totally fine with putting up signs in that area saying &amp;#39;audio and video recording in progress&amp;#39; then right? That would somewhat address the issue, and should be entirely uncontroversial to both sides.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also looks toward a future where enforcing such bans becomes nearly impossible due to the potential rise of ocular implants &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47569647&quot; title=&quot;Serious question: what will happen when people start getting implants? They’ll probably require some sort of off mode, but not sure how that would be enforced.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/BJ4pnropWdnzzgeJc/i-am-definitely-missing-the-pre-ai-writing-era&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I am definitely missing the pre-AI writing era&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lesswrong.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47571279&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;322 points · 240 comments · by joozio&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author reflects on the deterioration of their creative voice and writing skills due to AI dependency, sparked by a technical draft&amp;#39;s rejection for failing AI-detection metrics. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/BJ4pnropWdnzzgeJc/i-am-definitely-missing-the-pre-ai-writing-era&quot; title=&quot;Title: I am definitely missing the pre-AI writing era    URL Source: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/BJ4pnropWdnzzgeJc/i-am-definitely-missing-the-pre-ai-writing-era    Published Time: 2026-03-29T19:10:53.200Z    Markdown Content:  Yesterday, I wrote my first technical draft on what I was working on with the goal to share it publicly on here (well using an account dedicated to technical post), and did not realize how wanting to sound perfect actually steal the &amp;#39;&amp;#39;my voice&amp;#39; in the paper. Although 80 %…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of AI has created a tension between maintaining a unique human voice and achieving grammatical perfection, with some users finding it difficult to avoid sounding like an LLM even when writing naturally &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47571537&quot; title=&quot;This is exactly same struggle for me. Writing technical content about PostgreSQL and balancing my voice without sounding like LLM written is genuinely difficult. As English is not my first language, I do run into problem where the line between fix my clumsy sentence and rewrite my thought is very thin. Same with writing &amp;#39;boring&amp;#39; technical explanation and more approachable content. I&amp;#39;m getting pushed back for both.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576525&quot; title=&quot;What does it say about me that when I run my writing through one of those &amp;#39;detect if AI&amp;#39; tools I seldom see a value of less than 70% confidence that the writing was AI generated?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that refusing to edit or use tools results in incoherent &amp;#34;word puke&amp;#34; that disrespects the reader &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47577218&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;I just wrote what my brain is instructing to type (might not reread it before posting) Why would I put effort into reading something that had no effort put in by the author? This guy needs an editor, AI or otherwise.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47571840&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This post, is written without any tools assistance I just wrote what my brain is instructing to type (might not reread it before posting). How is the author complaining about the quality of their own writing while admitting to not even bothering reading what they wrote, let alone editing it? (Also, why would using a LLM based grammar checker trigger an AI writing detector? Did it end up rewriting substantial parts of the original submission?)&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47578124&quot; title=&quot;There are some people that believe that writing is an act of creative expression. In other words, that writing is primarily about the act (and as such, it&amp;#39;s a quite selfish activity). Editing destroys the expressive act and must be avoided. These people&amp;#39;s writing is usually incoherent and they are very proud of it. If you&amp;#39;ve ever read a bad new-age self-help book you&amp;#39;ve probably encountered writing like this. Good writers understand that writing is about communication. The initial act of…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that over-reliance on AI degrades creative expression and strips writing of its emotional resonance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576585&quot; title=&quot;AI for editing is garbage. Chat to it to get ideas maybe, but in its current incarnation it’s just going to degrade anything you filter through it.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47571969&quot; title=&quot;I want to emphasize a thought you expressed: &amp;gt; &amp;#39;..but maybe it&amp;#39;s a good thing that most of us don&amp;#39;t allow this technology to reframe our thoughts.&amp;#39; No, you&amp;#39;re not the only one experiencing this: I too had the same concerns as you: with every new thought, every new creation, I had to ask the AI&amp;#39;s opinion, as if I were no longer able to judge, to decide, without consulting the AI   (...just to be safe, you never know...). The only way to regain your creative ability is to write down your thoughts…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, there is a growing debate over whether raw, unpolished &amp;#34;stream of consciousness&amp;#34; writing is a valid rebellion against the dry, sterile nature of AI-generated content &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47572342&quot; title=&quot;Are grammatical errors and typos fashionable now? Reading this post it seems the anti-thesis in the LLM era is not to edit at all, but rather write down a stream of consciousness to make it &amp;#39;personal&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47572045&quot; title=&quot;Because they&amp;#39;re self-aware perfectionists and are actively working to stop it, because they reach for all kinds of tools like grammar checkers and AI, but they&amp;#39;re aware that using those will make the post lose &amp;#39;their&amp;#39; voice, or the human element of the post. And that&amp;#39;s, I think, a valid choice; you can choose to use all the tools and make something gramatically and stylistically as close to perfect, but who would want to read something as dry? That&amp;#39;s for formal writing, and blog posts are not…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dhanishsemar.com/writing/bird-brains&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bird brains (2023)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (dhanishsemar.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47573887&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;340 points · 220 comments · by DiffTheEnder&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;New Zealand’s kea parrots demonstrate advanced intelligence by manipulating traffic cones to stop cars for food, highlighting research that shows birds possess primate-level cognitive abilities due to high neuron density despite their small brain size. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dhanishsemar.com/writing/bird-brains&quot; title=&quot;Bird brains    A kea parrot in New Zealand learned to drag traffic cones onto a highway so cars would stop and humans would feed it. That sent me down a rabbit hole on how we actually measure bird intelligence.    [D:](/)    [Writing](/writing)[Curiosities](/curiosities)[Builds](/builds)[Past Battles](/battles)    [Writing](/writing)[Curiosities](/curiosities)[Builds](/builds)[Past Battles](/battles)    [← Writing](/writing)    # Bird brains    August 20237 min read#curiosity    Share    I was doomscrolling…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights that while birds possess complex minds and impressive memories, there is a sharp ethical divide over keeping them in cages, with some viewing it as imprisonment and others as a form of sanctuary &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47575777&quot; title=&quot;If you&amp;#39;re in tune with animals and spend time around a parrot, it&amp;#39;s obvious there is a lot going on in their minds.  They have incredible memories and their own understanding of their world.  It looks simple to us but they are not simple creatures.  That being said, I don&amp;#39;t know how a bird lover can keep a bird in a cage.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576166&quot; title=&quot;Many animals (including birds, dogs, horses) like the sanctuary and comfort of a cage and choose to use them, but obviously it shouldn&amp;#39;t be used like a prison.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47577143&quot; title=&quot;How did you arrive at the conclusion that birds like cages?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters debate the nature of avian intelligence, ranging from the idea that parrots merely mimic sounds to the theory that their linguistic abilities may be tied to specific neuron counts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47574716&quot; title=&quot;Given parrots can talk, there must be a neuron count that activates language (assuming anatomy allows it), similar to LLM parameter count.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47574893&quot; title=&quot;Parrots can&amp;#39;t &amp;#39;talk&amp;#39;. They just mimick noises they&amp;#39;ve heard before&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the conversation touches on the evolutionary optimization of bird brains as dinosaur descendants and compares their cognitive efficiency to other animals like octopuses &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47574783&quot; title=&quot;Interesting... I would have thought Octopi have more total neurons than dogs, given their problem-solving capabilities. Now I wonder if the decentralized organization / hub and spoke model octopi alone exhibit offers some advantage when it comes to problem-solving&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47574526&quot; title=&quot;I have to imagine that given birds are descendants of dinosaurs, which evolved quite a long time ago, they&amp;#39;ve had a lot more time to optimize certain things.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://smcleod.net/2026/03/new-apple-silicon-m4-m5-hidpi-limitation-on-4k-external-displays/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;New Apple Silicon M4 and M5 HiDPI Limitation on 4K External Displays&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (smcleod.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47569502&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;313 points · 167 comments · by smcleod&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple Silicon M4 and M5 chips contain a firmware regression that limits external 4K displays to a maximum HiDPI resolution of 3360x1890. This hardcoded limitation prevents full 3840x2160 HiDPI support, forcing users to choose between blurry text at native resolution or reduced workspace. &lt;a href=&quot;https://smcleod.net/2026/03/new-apple-silicon-m4-m5-hidpi-limitation-on-4k-external-displays/&quot; title=&quot;Title: New Apple Silicon M4 &amp;amp; M5 HiDPI Limitation on 4K External Displays    URL Source: https://smcleod.net/2026/03/new-apple-silicon-m4-m5-hidpi-limitation-on-4k-external-displays/    Published Time: 2026-03-29T01:00:00+10:00    Markdown Content:  # New Apple Silicon M4 &amp;amp; M5 HiDPI Limitation on 4K External Displays | smcleod.net    [![Image 1](https://smcleod.net/apple-touch-icon.png)Home](https://smcleod.net/ &amp;#39;Home (Alt + H)&amp;#39;)    *   [✍🏻 Posts](https://smcleod.net/posts &amp;#39;✍🏻 Posts&amp;#39;)  *   [🍱…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on a limitation in M4/M5 chips where macOS no longer supports a 7680x4320 (8K) framebuffer for 4K displays, a configuration some users previously used for high-density scaling &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47570020&quot; title=&quot;How did none of the Apple devs notice this? 4k 32&amp;#39; inch is the industry standard for HiDPI monitors.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47570588&quot; title=&quot;This might be a dumb question: Is the author looking to run 4k display at HiDPI 8k framebuffer and then downscale? What&amp;#39;s the advantage of doing so versus direct 4k low-DPI? Some sort of &amp;#39;free&amp;#39; antialiasing?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this setup is highly unusual and inefficient because it renders at 2x before downscaling, others note that 4K monitors at 27&amp;#34; or 32&amp;#34; often require non-integer scaling to achieve comfortable UI sizes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47569951&quot; title=&quot;This is not a normal retina configuration. This is a highly unusual configuration where the framebuffer is much larger than the screen resolution and gets scaled down. Obviously it sucks if it used to work and now it doesn&amp;#39;t but almost no one wants this which probably explains why Apple doesn&amp;#39;t care.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47570223&quot; title=&quot;The ideal work/coding resolutions and sizes for macOS that I would suggest if you are going down this rabbit hole. 24 inch 1080p  24 inch 4k (2x scaling)  27 inch 1440p  27 inch 5k (2x scaling)  32 inch 6k (2x scaling) Other sizes are going to either look bizarre or you’ll have to deal with fractional scaling. Given that 4k is common in 27/32 inches and those are cheap displays these kinds of problems are expected. I have personally refused to accept in the past that 27 inch 4k isn’t as bad as…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47570035&quot; title=&quot;Yeah. I don&amp;#39;t get it. If you&amp;#39;ve got a 3840x2160 display, intended use on macOS as a 1920x1080@2x display, what is the advantage of using a 7680x4320 buffer? Everything is drawn at twice the width and height - and then gets scaled down to half the width and height. Is there actually a good reason to do this? (I use my M4 Mac with 4K displays, and 5120x2880 (2560x1440@2x) buffers. That sort of thing does work, though if you sit closer than I do then you can see the non-integer scaling. Last time…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. To resolve the issue, users suggest emailing Tim Cook directly, citing past success in bypassing standard support channels to fix display-related bugs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47569979&quot; title=&quot;Send it to Tim Cook email. It worked for me fixing DisplayPort DSC bug. After Catalina, later MacOSes lost ability to drive monitors at higher than 60Hz refresh. Apple support tortured me with all kinds of diagnostics, with WontFix few weeks later. Wrote email and it got fixed in Sonoma :) https://egpu.io/forums/mac-setup/4k144hz-no-longer-available...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47570386&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t expect emails to get through to busy CEOs of huge companies like Apple unless you&amp;#39;re really lucky and they make it through some automation, but I have dropped him an email just in case. I guess you never know.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47569833&quot; title=&quot;Props to the author for putting in what looks like ton of work trying to navigate this issue, shame they have to go to these lengths to even have their case considered.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/03/ftc-takes-action-against-match-okcupid-deceiving-users-sharing-personal-data-third-party&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;FTC action against Match and OkCupid for deceiving users, sharing personal data&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ftc.gov)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47575616&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;316 points · 158 comments · by gnabgib&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FTC has taken action against Match Group and OkCupid for allegedly deceiving users and illegally sharing sensitive personal data with third parties. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/03/ftc-takes-action-against-match-okcupid-deceiving-users-sharing-personal-data-third-party&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.reuters.com&amp;amp;#x2F;world&amp;amp;#x2F;match-group-settles-us-ftc-claims-it-illegally-shared-okcupid-user-data-2026-03-30&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.reuters.com&amp;amp;#x2F;world&amp;amp;#x2F;match-group-settles-us-ftc-cla...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FTC&amp;#39;s action highlights severe privacy failures, including allegations that OkCupid shared millions of user photos with a third party linked to its founders&amp;#39; investments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47575963&quot; title=&quot;Key quote: &amp;gt; Even though it did not have any business relationship with OkCupid, the third-party data recipient asked the company to share large datasets of OkCupid user photos and related data with it because OkCupid’s founders were financial investors in the third party. OkCupid provided the third party with access to nearly three million OkCupid user photos as well as location and other information without placing any formal or contractual restrictions on how the information could be used,…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Users report disturbing technical glitches, such as accounts merging with strangers&amp;#39; profiles, and suspect that platforms sell data or leak email addresses to spammers after account deletion &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576079&quot; title=&quot;Throwaway account. I tried these sites a couple of times each in the past (the UK versions at least). I&amp;#39;m married now and fortunately don&amp;#39;t have to deal with &amp;#39;the dating scene&amp;#39; and how awful it is/was. When I signed up for Match, about ten minutes into the process my account suddenly changed to that of another man including different photo, descriptions, orientation etc. I don&amp;#39;t know why this happened but it was absolutely mortifying and an outrage Match did this. I dread to think how shit…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576782&quot; title=&quot;All of these sites do shady shit. I&amp;#39;m so glad I&amp;#39;m no longer single. I signed up for eHarmony with a unique email address dedicated to that site. After wasting 6 months, I chose to delete my account. Lo and behold, soon spam started to show up on this account, as if the floodgates had been opened. It was a unique account that I had not used anywhere else just for this specific reason, and my hunch was justified.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond data concerns, there is a strong consensus that the industry suffers from misaligned incentives, as apps profit from keeping users single rather than facilitating successful matches &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576922&quot; title=&quot;I met my current wife on OKC in 2010, before online dating became an utter cesspool. I&amp;#39;ve been out of the dating scene for 16 years now, but based on what I see on social media, I think online dating sucks today for three reasons. 1. Many men (Not all, but many) are there simply because they want to get laid.  They&amp;#39;re not looking for a relationship, they&amp;#39;re looking for a hook-up, and they&amp;#39;re not honest about their intentions.  It doesn&amp;#39;t help that people argue over whether Tinder is a dating…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47577632&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; They&amp;#39;re in a sticky spot where their most successful customer is one that they will never see another dime from, and there&amp;#39;s not really a way around it. naive question: why has no one made an app with the reverse incentive structure? i understand that the current business model is much more lucrative...but i feel like with how fed up people are with the inability of modern online dating to provide quality, long-lasting relationships a new platform that optimizes for match quality and…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. This has led to a &amp;#34;cesspool&amp;#34; environment characterized by adversarial dating dynamics, gender-based pricing discrimination, and the suspected use of fake profiles to maintain engagement &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576922&quot; title=&quot;I met my current wife on OKC in 2010, before online dating became an utter cesspool. I&amp;#39;ve been out of the dating scene for 16 years now, but based on what I see on social media, I think online dating sucks today for three reasons. 1. Many men (Not all, but many) are there simply because they want to get laid.  They&amp;#39;re not looking for a relationship, they&amp;#39;re looking for a hook-up, and they&amp;#39;re not honest about their intentions.  It doesn&amp;#39;t help that people argue over whether Tinder is a dating…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576013&quot; title=&quot;No class action or fines for discrimination based on gender?  OkCupid gave users different prices based on whether they selected male or female for their profile.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576145&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; OkCupid gave users different prices based on whether they selected male or female for their profile. never heard or thought about this before, but it kind of makes sense for a dating app. its one of the only levers available to them to attempt any sort of balance between user genders. it sucks for everyone (including the users) if the male:female ratio is like 20:1 or whatever. i would rather pay a couple of extra dollars, relative to the opposite sex, if it meant access to a wider pool of…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47578056&quot; title=&quot;I’m almost certain these dating apps, including Hinge and Bumble are creating loads of good-looking fake women profiles to attract male users and keep their platforms “sticky”. There are suspicious telltale signs like location downtown when nobody says they live downtown in my area. The same responses and prompts across multiple profiles. It’s equivalent to them cooking their books, but with vanity metrics.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.seattletimes.com/business/local-business/new-washington-law-bans-noncompete-agreements/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;New Washington state law bans noncompete agreements&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (seattletimes.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576861&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;336 points · 125 comments · by toomuchtodo&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Washington state has enacted a new law that effectively bans noncompete agreements, significantly limiting the ability of employers to restrict workers from joining competitors or starting their own businesses. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.seattletimes.com/business/local-business/new-washington-law-bans-noncompete-agreements/&quot; title=&quot;Title:     URL Source: https://www.seattletimes.com/business/local-business/new-washington-law-bans-noncompete-agreements/    Markdown Content:  Max challenge attempts exceeded. Please refresh the page to try again!  # JavaScript is disabled     In order to continue, we need to verify that you&amp;#39;re not a robot. This requires JavaScript. Enable JavaScript and then reload the page.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely agree that non-compete agreements are a &amp;#34;useless scare tactic&amp;#34; for most employees &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47577504&quot; title=&quot;Non-competes are almost always unenforceable. Never take money (although even then, they&amp;#39;re still mostly useless), and just ignore them and no one is going to do anything. That was what my business law professor taught us. No court is going to enforce a non-compete if it means the person who cannot compete is going to be unable to support themselves. The only time it&amp;#39;ll be enforced is if you&amp;#39;re already independently wealthy. In other words, a completely useless scare tactic.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; and that their unenforceability is a key driver of innovation in regions like Silicon Valley &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47577467&quot; title=&quot;It always baffles me how much resistance there is to banning noncompetes every time this is proposed, and how that resistance lives right alongside “we want to be the next Silicon Valley”, even though pretty much every analysis of “what’s Silicon Valley’s secret sauce” cites the unenforceability of noncompetes as one of the most important factors. But maybe the ship is turning very slowly.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that these agreements are necessary to protect small startups from having their intellectual property poached by larger corporations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47577694&quot; title=&quot;The flip side should be considered as well. There should be some sort of protection for small startup companies. A big company should not be able to steal an innovative startup&amp;#39;s technology by hiring away the employees that worked on the product. That used to happen a lot when Bill Gates was running Microsoft, for example. Patents provide some protection, but it is flawed because a big company can put you out of business if you get into a patent war. An employee should be able to leave at any…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest that they should only be valid if the employer provides a financial payout during the restricted period &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47578010&quot; title=&quot;This feels a tad heavy-handed and will make it tougher to sell a business without hard assets. It should just be banned for employees or require a payout of (previous salary) * (length of non-compete).&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47577993&quot; title=&quot;Here in Sweden non-competes without a financial agreement is void. And those that offer some financial are probably OK, but haven&amp;#39;t been tried extensively. The non-competes I&amp;#39;ve signed have offered 60% of my base pay for six months (the length of the non-compete) if I cannot find a job because of the contract if the company exercise it. They never have exercised it for me.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. A notable exception to the general opposition is the sale of a business, where many believe limited non-competes are fair to prevent a seller from immediately competing against the buyer &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47577745&quot; title=&quot;The only time I see non-competes as reasonable is when someone sells a business. It seems fair to put a territory restriction on a seller so the new owner doesn&amp;#39;t have to immediately start competing against the person they bought out.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47577986&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s how it works in California. I had a 3 year non-compete with VMware after we sold a business to them. It was restricted to the specific market and technology our business covered but didn&amp;#39;t limit activities in other areas. It seemed completely fair to me. Besides, competing would have meant doing exactly the same thing over again. What&amp;#39;s the fun in that?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, though some argue even these restrictions primarily benefit the wealthy at the expense of broader society &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47577912&quot; title=&quot;Why? They started one successful business. It seems good for society if they go on to start another.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47578103&quot; title=&quot;As the years go buy I&amp;#39;m gradually more and more in favor of restrictions to sell businesses.  They tend to benefit two groups: the people running a successful business and the people running the even more successful businesses buying them. They tend not to benefit the employees, the customers, the competitors and really anyone else besides a small number of people who are already very successful.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://eco3min.fr/en/us-inflation-is-not-linear/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;72% of the dollar&amp;#39;s purchasing power was destroyed in just four episodes&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (eco3min.fr)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47575089&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;208 points · &lt;strong&gt;251 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by latentframe&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since 1914, the U.S. dollar has lost 96.9% of its purchasing power, with 72% of that destruction occurring during just four concentrated inflationary episodes: WWI, WWII, the Great Inflation (1968–1982), and the post-COVID surge. &lt;a href=&quot;https://eco3min.fr/en/us-inflation-is-not-linear/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Inflation Tax: 113 Years of US Purchasing Power Destruction — When It Accelerated, What Drove It, and What the Data Reveals    URL Source: https://eco3min.fr/en/us-inflation-is-not-linear/    Published Time: 2026-03-28    Markdown Content:  # The Inflation Tax: 113 Years of US CPI Data (1913–2026)  [Skip to content](https://eco3min.fr/en/us-inflation-is-not-linear/#main)    *   [Macroeconomics](https://eco3min.fr/en/macro-financial-regimes/)  *   [Monetary…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters debate whether the dollar&amp;#39;s decline is driven by military overspend and a shift toward a &amp;#34;petro-yuan,&amp;#34; which could allow countries like Iran to bypass the U.S. dollar in energy trades &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47575820&quot; title=&quot;This supports my hunch that the current Iran war creates a lethal trifecta that could potentially cause a dollar collapse. 1. Massive military overspend. 2. Petrodollar squeeze (Strait of Hormuz). 3. Allies pulling out: Europe and the Gulf diversifying both their investments and defense purchases. #1 creates oversupply of dollars and #2 and #3 lower demand. This study supports the idea that wars can indeed destroy purchasing power.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47575931&quot; title=&quot;Iran is also playing its own Uno card here by saying that it would consider allowing some oil and gas shipments through the Strait if they have been bought with Chinese Yuan, than the US dollar. ( The Islamic Republic may grant safe passage to oil tankers if the cargo is traded in Chinese yuan - https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/iran-allow-chinese-ships-hormu... ).&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576626&quot; title=&quot;Petro-yuan =/= reserve currency. USD reserve = print USD for everything liquidity to sustain debt financed existence where Triffin hollows out industry, and financialize everything because having stupid amount of liquidity incentivizes certain behaviors. Petro-yuan = PRC gives swap lines to trusted partners to buy oil denominated in yuan in exchange for things like resources. Hormuz ships ~1 trillion USD worth energy that needs &amp;#39;swapping&amp;#39; - incidentally PRC imports around ~2-3 trillion, more…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some argue that China may resist this shift because liberalizing the yuan to facilitate global trade could break its currency peg and damage its own economy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576081&quot; title=&quot;This is particularly funny if you consider petrodollar to be a bad deal for US, not a good one. Ironically, if yuan becomes new petroleum currency, it might hurt Chinese long term.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576930&quot; title=&quot;The problem with that plan is that no one wants to trade hard commodities for a currency that can’t be spent. One part of the dollars appeal is that it spends the world over. The sanctioned countries frequently have more liberal access to dollars than to unsanctioned yuan. So no one is going to take up a lot of yuan trade unless that changes or they are forced to. But that puts China in a bind. Liberalizing their currency is going to require very careful and slow actions, China threads this…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics also question the study&amp;#39;s methodology, suggesting the four historical &amp;#34;episodes&amp;#34; were cherry-picked and failed to account for baseline exponential inflation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47575998&quot; title=&quot;This study doesn&amp;#39;t correct for baseline exponential decay due to inflation, to better highlight the meaningful variations. By comparing based on 1914 dollars it also causes old variations to be relatively more extreme and newer inflationary events to look less extreme. You must compare apples to apples. Finally the events are quite cherry-picked. It is a conclusion looking for a result, when the statistical reason for choosing those 4 events simply isn&amp;#39;t evident when you look at the data…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Finally, there is skepticism regarding political goals to weaken the dollar to revive U.S. manufacturing, as domestic labor costs remain uncompetitive with overseas markets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576194&quot; title=&quot;One of the goals of the Heritage Foundation is a weak dollar. They believe they can bring manufacturing back to the US this way. I don&amp;#39;t think they&amp;#39;re right. I do think they will continue weakening the dollar.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47576516&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; One of the goals of the Heritage Foundation is a weak dollar. They believe they can bring manufacturing back to the US this way. Only cheap labor can bring manufacturing back to the US. Are Americans willing to work in factories for the same wages as the Chinese and Indians? I don&amp;#39;t see it happening.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.datagubbe.se/aipixels/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The curious case of retro demo scene graphics&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (datagubbe.se)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47570666&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;356 points · 91 comments · by zdw&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The retro demo scene is grappling with the rise of generative AI, which challenges a long-standing culture that prioritizes manual craft and painstaking effort over originality, as artists transition from traditional plagiarism and &amp;#34;copy art&amp;#34; to modern digital tools. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.datagubbe.se/aipixels/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Curious Case of Retro Demo Scene Graphics    URL Source: https://www.datagubbe.se/aipixels/    Markdown Content:  # The Curious Case of Retro Demo Scene Graphics | datagubbe.se    # { datagubbe }    * * *    [datagubbe.se](https://www.datagubbe.se/) » the curious case of retro demo scene graphics    ## The Curious Case of Retro Demo Scene Graphics    **On copying, tracing, converting and prompting.**    _March 2026_    &amp;gt; My whole art department is run on tracing paper. Why re-invent the wheel?   &amp;gt;   &amp;gt; -…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The demoscene&amp;#39;s history of &amp;#34;copying&amp;#34; art is rooted in its origins among software crackers, where rebellious teenagers often repurposed professional works like those of Boris Vallejo without credit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47571659&quot; title=&quot;Let&amp;#39;s not forget that most of these pictures were made by teenagers, doing the best they could (and hoping others didn&amp;#39;t know about Boris Vallejo). The demoscene was very young back then. Copying is generally considered pretty lame in the demoscene these days.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47573841&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Theft from the outside world, however, is often taken lightly - especially when it comes to graphics. One should not forget where the demoscene is coming from: crackers. The whole point of &amp;#39;intros&amp;#39; was to show off the skills of whoever cracked a piece of software. So obviously, the views demoscene held on intellectual property are not mainstream, if we can say it like that. The shift to a more creative and law abiding art scene, led by adults and not rebellious teenagers is more recent…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that copying is a fundamental part of the learning process, the lack of attribution is often viewed as misleading to the audience &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47571397&quot; title=&quot;Focusing on &amp;#39;copying&amp;#39; seems like missing the forest for the trees. There&amp;#39;s the copyright angle, but copyright laws are unnatural obstacles designed to give the original author some control over what happens after publishing. They&amp;#39;re not fundamental, we made the laws. What is fundamental is this: every artist starts out by copying the works of others. It&amp;#39;s how you learn. And in that framing, once you publish your derived work, there is only one question that arises - if you don&amp;#39;t credit the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Modern debates have shifted toward the use of generative AI; some see it as a tool for optimization and technical problem-solving &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47570992&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;It&amp;#39;s a place of refuge from the constant churn of increased efficiency Increased efficiency also seems to be part of its appeal. The limitation is you can&amp;#39;t increase efficiency by just upgrading computer specs, but instead have to find innovating ways to use the existing resources as efficient as possible to make something great. These kinds of optimization or compression problems seems like something AI would be very helpful for, so I think it is premature to try and ban its usage.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47571951&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s definitely been success in using generative AI for vintage Computers. Just the other day I got it to produce a bootable floppy for my Amiga 1200. It loads the network driver, uses BOOTP to get an ip address, connects to a server and then downloads code via UDP that it will then execute.  I doubt you&amp;#39;ll get it doing amazing graphical scenes like you see in the demo scene though.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, while others argue that outsourcing the creative process to AI undermines the core ethos of overcoming hardware limitations through personal craft &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47571101&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Farting around with Amigas in 2026 means actively choosing to make things harder for the sake of making things harder. Making that choice and still outsourcing the bulk of the craft and creative process is like claiming to be a passionate hobby cook while serving professionally catered dinners and pretending they&amp;#39;re your own concoctions. People wanting to explore the use of generative AI for vintage computers is happening not just for graphics but for code too. I think in the case of code…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47573780&quot; title=&quot;I would contest that choosing not to reveal the use of AI is due to an agreement of the nature of the behaviour.   In an ideal world that could maybe be the case, but I think the driving force behind secrecy is harassment. There are those who use AI as part of their process proudly, but secretly, because they know they will receive abuse. I really wonder how some people think of themselves as artists while simultaneously attacking another persons choice of self expression.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sockpuppet.org/blog/2026/03/30/vulnerability-research-is-cooked/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Vulnerability research is cooked&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sockpuppet.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47578086&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;259 points · 170 comments · by pedro84&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AI coding agents are poised to revolutionize exploit development by automating the discovery of high-impact zero-day vulnerabilities through pattern-matching and reasoning. This shift threatens to overwhelm traditional defenses, challenge the sustainability of open-source security, and potentially trigger reactive, incoherent government regulations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sockpuppet.org/blog/2026/03/30/vulnerability-research-is-cooked/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Vulnerability Research Is Cooked    URL Source: https://sockpuppet.org/blog/2026/03/30/vulnerability-research-is-cooked/    Published Time: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 20:50:36 GMT    Markdown Content:  For the last two years, technologists have ominously predicted that AI coding agents will be responsible for a deluge of security vulnerabilities. They were right! Just, not for the reasons they thought.    Within the next few months, coding agents will drastically alter both the practice and the economics…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether LLMs will favor defenders by allowing them to find and patch vulnerabilities before deployment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47579333&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand why the takeaway here is (unless I&amp;#39;m missing something), more or less &amp;#39;everything is going to get exploited all the time&amp;#39;. If LLMs can really find a ton of vulnerabilities in my software, why would I not run them and just patch all the vulnerabilities, leading to perfectly secure software (or, at the very least, software for which LLMs can no longer find any new vulnerabilities)?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47581234&quot; title=&quot;Am I wrong in thinking that an &amp;#39;exploits are free&amp;#39; environment massively favors the defender? Given that real-world exploits usually chain 0days, the attacker has to find the whole chain while the defender only needs to fix the weakest link. The defender also gets to make the first move by just putting a &amp;#39;run an agent to find vulns&amp;#39; step in their CI pipeline. If LLMs truly make finding exploits free, almost no LLM-findable exploits will ever make it into the codebase. The only way break the…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that AI agents can now automate the remediation of entire bug queues &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47579819&quot; title=&quot;That might have been true pre LLMs but you can literally point an agent at the queue until it’s empty now.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47580456&quot; title=&quot;You can have an AI agent refactor and improve code quality.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the bottleneck remains human resources and the risk of AI-generated patches introducing new, complex defects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47579485&quot; title=&quot;When did we enter the twilight zone where bug trackers are consistently empty? The limiting factor of bug reduction is remediation, not discovery. Even developer smoke testing usually surfaces bugs at a rate far faster than they can be fixed let alone actual QA. To be fair, the limiting factor in remediation is usually finding a reproducible test case which a vulnerability is by necessity. But, I would still bet most systems have plenty of bugs in their bug trackers which are accompanied by a…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47579914&quot; title=&quot;You literally cannot, since ANY changes to code tend to introduce unintended (or at least not explicitly requested) new behaviors.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47580142&quot; title=&quot;Assuming you can catch every new bug it introduces. Both assumptions being unlikely. You also end up with a code base you let an AI agent trample until it is satisfied; ballooned in complexity and redudant brittle code.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, there is skepticism regarding &amp;#34;perfect&amp;#34; security, as code complexity continues to outpace analysis tools and fundamental theoretical limits like the halting problem persist &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47579344&quot; title=&quot;I interned for the author at 18. I assumed security testing worked like this: 1. Static analysis catches nearly all bugs with near-total code coverage 2. Private tooling extends that coverage further with better static analysis and dynamic analysis, and that edge is what makes contractors valuable 3. Humans focus on design flaws and weird hardware bugs like cryptographic side-channels from electromagnetic emanations Turns out finding all the bugs is really hard. Codebases and compiler output…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47579616&quot; title=&quot;Catching all bugs with static analysis would involve solving the halting problem, so it&amp;#39;s never going to happen.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.lysk.tech/excalidraw-frame-export/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I use Excalidraw to manage my diagrams for my blog&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.lysk.tech)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47571376&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;283 points · 115 comments · by mlysk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Martin Lysk developed a forked VSCode extension for Excalidraw that automatically exports frames as light and dark mode SVGs when they are prefixed with `export_`. This automation replaces a manual multi-step process, allowing for seamless local previews and image management within his blog&amp;#39;s workflow. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.lysk.tech/excalidraw-frame-export/&quot; title=&quot;Title: How I manage Images for my Blog    URL Source: https://blog.lysk.tech/excalidraw-frame-export/    Published Time: 2026-03-29T00:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  # How I manage Images for my Blog | Martin Lysk    [Skip to main content](https://blog.lysk.tech/excalidraw-frame-export/#__docusaurus_skipToContent_fallback)    [**Martin Lysk**](https://blog.lysk.tech/)[Blog](https://blog.lysk.tech/)    [GitHub](https://github.com/martin-lysk)    All posts    ### 2026    *   [SQLite on Git, Part I: The .git…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion reveals a sharp divide over Excalidraw’s &amp;#34;hand-drawn&amp;#34; aesthetic, with some users finding it &amp;#34;childish&amp;#34; and inaccessible &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47572014&quot; title=&quot;Excalidraw has proliferated quite widely in my company since we got Claude Code. Its a shame the default font is ugly, childish and inaccessible.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47572589&quot; title=&quot;Whiteboard handwriting is childish?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, while others argue the wonky style effectively communicates that a concept is a high-level, approximate illustration rather than a precise technical spec &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47572554&quot; title=&quot;I like the wonky, hand-drawn looking style. I think it fits well beause usually if I use a diagram it&amp;#39;s not 100% precise and accurate, but more a high-level illustration. The wonky style conveys the approximate precision of the presented concept. Also, and that&amp;#39;s personal, I think it&amp;#39;s cute.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics suggest these diagrams are becoming &amp;#34;AI tells&amp;#34; similar to specific linguistic patterns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47572043&quot; title=&quot;Everyone does that these days and they are becoming AI tells like the em-dash or the blue-glow of the early AI generated images that everyone added to their blog posts.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, though others note that AI currently struggles to generate native Excalidraw files compared to Mermaid diagrams &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47572094&quot; title=&quot;AI can generate mermaid diagrams, not excalidraw. If you use the mermaid to excalidraw, i guess it can be, but it just looks like a mermaid diagram then and not an excalidraw.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond aesthetics, participants debated the technical implementation of dark mode in SVGs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47575308&quot; title=&quot;Looks pretty cool. I think it&amp;#39;s great that you support light/dark mode. FWIWI, I&amp;#39;m also a huge fan of Excalidraw. I wanted to ask you: is there&amp;#39;s a reason you use a separate svg file for each (light/dark) mode? A single SVG file using CSS can change it&amp;#39;s own colors based on the user&amp;#39;s preference. I have an example here: http://alejo.ch/3jj - the 3 plots should honor your mode (I put the generator code here: https://github.com/alefore/mini_svg ) Just figure I&amp;#39;d ask. If you have a good reason for…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt; and questioned whether complex diagrams are better treated as disposable tools for early-stage thinking rather than long-term documentation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47573644&quot; title=&quot;I have noticed diagrams are most useful early in thinking, but once things get complex they either become outdated or too hard to maintain. Curious how people here deal with that, do you keep diagrams in sync with code, or treat them as disposable?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://claude.nagdy.me/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Learn Claude Code by doing, not reading&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (claude.nagdy.me)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47579229&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;278 points · 112 comments · by taubek&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ahmed Nagdy has launched an interactive learning platform for Claude Code featuring 11 modules, terminal simulators, and configuration builders to help users master the tool through hands-on practice without requiring an installation or API key. &lt;a href=&quot;https://claude.nagdy.me/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Learn Claude Code Interactively — by Ahmed Nagdy    URL Source: https://claude.nagdy.me/    Markdown Content:  # Learn Claude Code Interactively — by Ahmed Nagdy  [Skip to main content](https://claude.nagdy.me/#main-content)    [![Image 1](https://claude.nagdy.me/favicon.svg)claude.nagdy.me](https://claude.nagdy.me/)[Learn](https://claude.nagdy.me/learn)[Playground](https://claude.nagdy.me/playground)[Config Builder](https://claude.nagdy.me/build)[Cheat…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are reporting significant frustration with Claude Code&amp;#39;s rapid quota consumption, which some attribute to the tool defaulting to a 1M token context window &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47580106&quot; title=&quot;Side note: I don’t know what Anthropic changed but now Claude Code consumes the quota incredibly fast. I have the Max5 plan, and it just consumed about 10% of the session quota in 10 minutes on a single prompt. For $100/month, I have higher expectations.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47580395&quot; title=&quot;I noticed 1M context window is default and no way not to use it. If your context is at 500-900k tokens every prompt, you’re gonna hit limits fast.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47580153&quot; title=&quot;Relevant: https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1s7zgj0/investiga... https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1s7mkn3/psa_claud...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest technical workarounds to disable this large context, others argue that the lack of transparency regarding token usage makes the tool difficult to manage in a principled way &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47580434&quot; title=&quot;export CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_1M_CONTEXT=1&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47580915&quot; title=&quot;This is a serious problem with the fact that it&amp;#39;s nearly impossible to understand what a &amp;#39;token&amp;#39; is and how to tame their use in a principled way. It&amp;#39;s like if cars didn&amp;#39;t advertise MPG, but instead something that could change randomly.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the discussion reflects a divide between those questioning the value of &amp;#34;learning&amp;#34; a non-deterministic tool and those finding the current onboarding quizzes inaccurate for experienced users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47579873&quot; title=&quot;Are people again learning a new set of tools? Just tell the AI what you want, if the AI tool doesn&amp;#39;t allow that then tell another Ai tool to make you a translation layer that will convert the natural language to the commands etc. What&amp;#39;s the point of learning yet another tool?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47580242&quot; title=&quot;I use claude code every day, I&amp;#39;ve written plugins and skills, use MCP servers, subagent workflows, and filled out the &amp;#39;Find your level&amp;#39; quiz as such. According to the quiz, I am a beginner!&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47580236&quot; title=&quot;Why wpuld anyone want to &amp;#39;learn&amp;#39; how to use some non-deterministic black box of bullshit that is frequently wrong? When you get different output fkr the same input, how do you learn?   How is that beneficial? Why would you waste your time learning something that is frequently changing at the whims of some greedy third party? No thanks.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://community.webminal.org/t/15-years-one-server-8gb-ram-and-500k-users-how-webminal-refuses-to-die/8803&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;15 years, one server, 8GB RAM and 500k users – how Webminal refuses to die&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (community.webminal.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47570940&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;304 points · 54 comments · by giis&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since 2011, the Linux learning platform Webminal has served 500,000 users using a single 8GB RAM server and a legacy tech stack. Despite surviving a datacenter fire and financial hurdles, the project remains a free, community-funded resource for students to practice terminal commands and sysadmin skills. &lt;a href=&quot;https://community.webminal.org/t/15-years-one-server-8gb-ram-and-500k-users-how-webminal-refuses-to-die/8803&quot; title=&quot;15 years, one server, 8GB RAM and 500k users - how Webminal refuses to die    The server webminal.org runs on a single CentOS Linux box with 8GB RAM. That’s it. No Kubernetes, no microservices, no auto-scaling. One server since 2011. It has survived: A datacenter fire in 2021 (we lost 150k user accounts) Multiple power outages in the Netherlands That one time in 2017 when a Spanish tech blog sent 10,000 users in one day My friend Freston’s insistence that Slackware is the only real distro The…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a nostalgic appreciation for &amp;#34;old school&amp;#34; efficient engineering, with many users arguing that 8GB of RAM is actually quite substantial for a web server despite modern bloat &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47572590&quot; title=&quot;To be fair. 8GB of ram is huge.  I don&amp;#39;t know, maybe I&amp;#39;m stuck in the early 00s but even 2 GB of ram still seems extravagant; I remember when that was an exotic amount of RAM for dedicated gamers to play extremely high fidelity games, so for a mere web server 8 GB of ram almost seems like absurd overkill.  I still feel a tinge of shame whenever I see any software of my own using more than a few hundred megabytes.  What a waste.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47572626&quot; title=&quot;Old school internet. Internet done right. Great work giis. I haven&amp;#39;t used it, I didn&amp;#39;t know it existed until now, but I&amp;#39;m happy it exists and has been providing service to those who need it. There should be more of this.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users reminisce about eras when 64K or 16MB were considered massive amounts of memory, others question the technical limits of the current setup, specifically how many simultaneous users can be supported if each is allocated 256MB &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47573566&quot; title=&quot;64K was huge when the Commodore 64 came along.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47572637&quot; title=&quot;I remember when 16 MB was considered a lot. Then again, I also remember when graphics acceleration was considered optional.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47571733&quot; title=&quot;This is so fascinating, I&amp;#39;ve never heard of UML! How many users can this support simultaneously? It says 256MB RAM per user, 8GB total on server? But it&amp;#39;s probably more than 32 simultaneous users?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also speculation regarding the cost-effectiveness of long-term hosting versus modern alternatives like cheap mini PCs or free cloud tiers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47571636&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s wonderful and I know why it&amp;#39;s an Indian founder. Was so hard to get a remote shell back then. Indian debit cards didn&amp;#39;t work online reliably and so on. So what&amp;#39;s the hardware underneath? Cloud server or on-prem? These days the world is amazing. Oracle Cloud gives you a ton for free. But perhaps there&amp;#39;s some niche where this is useful. I have to say that this shared screen comms system is outrageously crazy, hahaha.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47571584&quot; title=&quot;I wonder how much money went into the hosting over the years. A year ago I bought a Intel N100 Mini PC with 16 GB DDR5 RAM and a 512 GB SSD for $170. Maybe it could have hosted the site too. It&amp;#39;s certainly a lot faster than Azure VMs with 4 &amp;#39;vCPUs&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-03-29</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-03-29</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47561489&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LinkedIn uses 2.4 GB RAM across two tabs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47561489&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;685 points · 394 comments · by hrncode&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A user report highlights significant memory consumption by LinkedIn, showing the platform using approximately 2.4 GB of RAM across only two open browser tabs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47561489&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;ibb.co&amp;amp;#x2F;fYQVfMWp&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;ibb.co&amp;amp;#x2F;fYQVfMWp&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;ibb.co&amp;amp;#x2F;MyTNnrGQ&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;ibb.co&amp;amp;#x2F;MyTNnrGQ&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters express disbelief that modern web applications like LinkedIn and AWS require gigabytes of RAM for text-heavy interfaces, contrasting this with the 69 KB used by Voyager 1 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563004&quot; title=&quot;AWS has a similar RAM consumption. I close Signal to make sure it doesn&amp;#39;t crash and corrupt the message history when I need to open more than one browser tab with AWS in the work VM. I think after you click a few pages, one AWS tab was something like 1.4GB (edit: found it in message history, yes it was &amp;#39;20% of 7GB&amp;#39; = 1.4GB precisely) Does anyone else have the feeling they run into this sort of thing more often of late? Simple pages with just text on it that take gigabytes (AWS), or pages that…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565730&quot; title=&quot;The juxtaposition between this and &amp;#39;Voyager 1 runs on 69 KB of memory and an 8-track tape recorder&amp;#39; is probably the best one I&amp;#39;ve seen in a long time&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565898&quot; title=&quot;A probe collecting data in space takes &amp;lt;70 kB of memory. I fail to see how this statement should make me feel happy&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that browsers intentionally use available memory for caching &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563052&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand why people get so hung up on Chrome using so much memory. A lot of this memory is &amp;#39;discardable&amp;#39; so will get dropped when the system is under memory pressure and the amount of memory allocated for this type of usage will depend on how much memory your system has available. If Chrome is using lots of memory then it&amp;#39;s almost always because your system has lots of available memory. It allows the browser to cache large images and video assets that would otherwise have to be…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others blame inefficient web frameworks and &amp;#34;layered&amp;#34; architectures that re-render entire pages unnecessarily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563042&quot; title=&quot;I think a big problem is the fact that many web frameworks allow you to write these kind of complex apps that just &amp;#39;work&amp;#39; but performance is often not included in the equation so it looks fine during basic testing but it scales really bad. like for example claude/openAI web UIs, they at first would literally lag so bad because they&amp;#39;d just use simple updating mechanisms which would re-render the entire conversation history every time the new response text was updated and with those console UIs,…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond performance, users are divided on LinkedIn&amp;#39;s utility: many view it as a &amp;#34;Severance&amp;#34;-like dystopia of AI-generated fluff &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47562501&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand who uses that network anymore. Everytime I login it&amp;#39;s all ai generated stories next to ai generated flavor images of people sounding like a parody of themselves (&amp;#39;what taking my kids to school taught me about business scaling&amp;#39;). Out of all places to doomscroll, why choose the one that feels like an episode of Severance?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564548&quot; title=&quot;Let&amp;#39;s be real, LinkedIn is full of LinkedIn Lunatics but pretty much all mainstream social media is pretty shit. They&amp;#39;re just different flavors of shit. LinkedIn: bad. Facebook: bad. Twitter: I literally think it contributed to the collapse of discourse and rise of shallow thought / rejection of expertise. I&amp;#39;m not going to list more because the theme is, you guessed it, they&amp;#39;re bad. Google+ had promise in that the many problems of the other platforms could be curtailed with tooling to make your…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47562704&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a social network that became socially acceptable to browse at work. It has all the negative attributes associated with a social network and none of the upsides (apart from the occasional recruiter message).&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, though one defender argues it is the &amp;#34;realest&amp;#34; social network because users have the professional &amp;#34;skin in the game&amp;#34; to avoid total anonymity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564071&quot; title=&quot;I know I&amp;#39;m old, but I now find LinkedIn to be my favorite social media site, and I&amp;#39;ll explain why. Skin in the game. Yes, it&amp;#39;s full of fluffy sounding things, but with a little patience and reading between lines, it&amp;#39;s extremely valuable and here&amp;#39;s why: Overwhelmingly most of the time -- when someone posts anything there -- it has the potential to directly quickly improve, or more importantly destroy, their own LIVELIHOOD. It feels like the opposite, but making the choice to post there is a huge…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.buchodi.com/chatgpt-wont-let-you-type-until-cloudflare-reads-your-react-state-i-decrypted-the-program-that-does-it/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ChatGPT won&amp;#39;t let you type until Cloudflare reads your React state&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (buchodi.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566865&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;474 points · 330 comments · by alberto-m&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A security researcher has decrypted Cloudflare’s Turnstile program for ChatGPT, revealing that it verifies 55 properties—including internal React application states—to ensure users are running a fully hydrated web app rather than a bot. The system also utilizes behavioral biometrics and proof-of-work challenges to prevent automated access. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.buchodi.com/chatgpt-wont-let-you-type-until-cloudflare-reads-your-react-state-i-decrypted-the-program-that-does-it/&quot; title=&quot;Title: ChatGPT Won&amp;#39;t Let You Type Until Cloudflare Reads Your React State. I Decrypted the Program That Does It.    URL Source: https://www.buchodi.com/chatgpt-wont-let-you-type-until-cloudflare-reads-your-react-state-i-decrypted-the-program-that-does-it/    Published Time: 2026-03-29T18:37:43.000Z    Markdown Content:  # ChatGPT Won&amp;#39;t Let You Type Until Cloudflare Reads Your React State. I Decrypted the Program That Does It.    [Buchodi&amp;#39;s Threat Intel](https://www.buchodi.com/)    *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI defends its use of Cloudflare integrity checks as a necessary measure to prevent bot abuse and preserve GPU resources for legitimate users, particularly those on free tiers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567575&quot; title=&quot;Hey! I&amp;#39;m Nick, and I work on Integrity at OpenAI. These checks are part of how we protect our first-party products from abuse like bots, scraping, fraud, and other attempts to misuse the platform. A big reason we invest in this is because we want to keep free and logged-out access available for more users. My team’s goal is to help make sure the limited GPU resources are going to real users. We also keep a very close eye on the user impact. We monitor things like page load time, time to first…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. However, users argue these protections disproportionately penalize privacy-conscious individuals using VPNs or browsers like Firefox, effectively forcing a choice between privacy and functionality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567238&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s absurd how unusable Cloudflare is making the web when using a browser or IP address they consider &amp;#39;suspicious&amp;#39;. I&amp;#39;ve lately been drowning in captchas for the crime of using Firefox. All in the interest of &amp;#39;bot protection&amp;#39;, of course.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567679&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s getting to the point where a user needs at minimum two browsers. One to allow all this horrendous client checking so that crucial services work, and another browser to attempt to prevent tracking users across the web. Nick, I understand the practical realities regarding why you&amp;#39;d need to try to tamp down on some bot traffic, but do you see a world where users are not forced to choose between privacy and functionality?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567375&quot; title=&quot;The real frustrating part is that Cloudflare&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;definition&amp;#39; of suspicious keeps changing and expanding. VPN users, privacy-first browsers, uncommon IP ranges, they all get flagged. The people most likely to get caught by these systems are exactly the ones who care most about their privacy, and not the bots that they are apparently targeting.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics also highlight the irony of OpenAI labeling scraping as &amp;#34;abuse&amp;#34; given its own business model &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47568172&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s interesting to me that OpenAI considers scraping to be a form of abuse.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, while others report that these heavy client-side scripts may contribute to degrading UI performance in long chat sessions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567689&quot; title=&quot;Don’t know if it’s related to the article, but the chats ui performance becomes absolutely horrendous in long chats. Typing the chat box is slow, rendering lags and sometimes gets stuck altogether. I have a research chat that I have to think twice before messaging because the performance is so bad. Running on iPhone 16 safari, and MacBook Pro m3 chrome.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.umich.edu/nitrile-and-latex-gloves-may-cause-overestimation-of-microplastics-u-m-study-reveals/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Nitrile and latex gloves may cause overestimation of microplastics&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (news.umich.edu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47561711&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;537 points · 241 comments · by giuliomagnifico&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A University of Michigan study found that nitrile and latex gloves can contaminate lab equipment with stearates, non-plastic particles that mimic the appearance and chemical structure of microplastics. This contamination may lead to significant overestimations of microplastic pollution in environmental samples. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.umich.edu/nitrile-and-latex-gloves-may-cause-overestimation-of-microplastics-u-m-study-reveals/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Nitrile and latex gloves may cause overestimation of microplastics, U-M study reveals    URL Source: https://news.umich.edu/nitrile-and-latex-gloves-may-cause-overestimation-of-microplastics-u-m-study-reveals/    Published Time: 2026-03-26T12:08:18-04:00    Markdown Content:  [![Image 1: Residue from nitrile or latex gloves may unintentionally contaminate lab equipment scientists use to measure microplastics in air, water and other samples with non-plastic particles called stearates. Stearates,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on whether this discovery invalidates broader microplastic research, with some arguing that the failure to account for laboratory plastic contamination suggests a lack of rigorous controls in the field &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47562866&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m amazed that wasn&amp;#39;t taken into account! Many years ago, in the final year of my Biology degree, I did a paid summer internship at an Evolutionary Biology lab here in Spain, assisting in a project where they were researching relationships between metal ion accumulation (mostly zinc) and certain SNPs (≈&amp;#39;gene varieties&amp;#39;). A lot of my work was in slicing tiny fragments of deep-frozen human livers and kidneys in a biosafety cabinet over dry ice. The reason I bring this up is because the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563597&quot; title=&quot;You found a paper saying that contamination is possible. That doesn’t mean that most of these plastic studies are doing the necessary controls, let alone the (almost impossible) task of preventing the contamination in a laboratory setting where nanomolar detection levels are used to make broad claims.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users view the &amp;#34;microplastic alarmism&amp;#34; as a product of skewed grant incentives and undefined harms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564458&quot; title=&quot;The various &amp;#39;OMG MICROPLASTICS&amp;#39; studies always smacked of alarmism. No one has actually identified tangible harms from microplastics; it&amp;#39;s just taken as a given that they are bad. So this fueled a bunch of studies that tried to find them everywhere. Even the authors of this study go to great pains to not challenge the dogma that microplastics are existentially terrifying. So I fully expect we&amp;#39;ll still be panicking over vague, undefined harm whenever we find microplastics somewhere. This type of…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others defend the scientific process, noting that experts do publish papers specifically to identify and correct these contamination risks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563399&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#39;m amazed that wasn&amp;#39;t taken into account! This was taken into account: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563392&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47562518&quot; title=&quot;Doesn&amp;#39;t have to be one or the other. Trust, but verify? Experts make mistakes, professional equipment can be mishandled. Don&amp;#39;t take anybodies word, look at the evidence for yourself. This is a very scientific way of thinking. It&amp;#39;s only gotten a bad rap on account of people using it to attack others&amp;#39; research and then(crucially) failing to perform their own.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the discussion touches on the practical impact of glove mandates in food service, debating whether they improve hygiene or actually decrease it by dulling the wearer&amp;#39;s sensory awareness of contamination &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47562842&quot; title=&quot;So basically the gloves that kitchen staff now must wear means we get an extra dose of micro plastics? Yikes.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563658&quot; title=&quot;Funnily, I believe the glove mandates for food prep are actually anti-hygiene. Unlike bare skin, you can&amp;#39;t really feel when your gloves are contaminated.  So you are less likely to replace gloves when you should.  With bare hands, you can feel the raw chicken juices on you, so it&amp;#39;s pretty natural to want to wash your hands right after handling the raw chicken. Gloves are important in medicine, but that&amp;#39;s with proper use where doctors and nurses put on new gloves for every patient.  That doesn&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563786&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; So you are less likely to replace gloves when you should. To the contrary. You take off and throw out your gloves every time you finish doing something with raw meat. It&amp;#39;s procedure. It&amp;#39;s habit. You&amp;#39;re never relying on &amp;#39;feel&amp;#39; to determine whether there are &amp;#39;raw chicken juices on you&amp;#39;. Using &amp;#39;feel&amp;#39; is not reliable. I don&amp;#39;t know why you think food service workers aren&amp;#39;t constantly putting on new gloves, but doctors and nurses are. Like, if you&amp;#39;re cutting up chicken for an hour you&amp;#39;re not, but…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://action.wemove.eu/sign/2026-03-palantir-petition-EN&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Say No to Palantir in Europe&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (action.wemove.eu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563655&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;537 points · 153 comments · by Betelbuddy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WeMove Europe has launched a petition urging European governments and the EU to phase out contracts with U.S. tech firm Palantir, citing concerns over mass surveillance, data privacy, and the company&amp;#39;s involvement in international conflicts and deportations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://action.wemove.eu/sign/2026-03-palantir-petition-EN&quot; title=&quot;Title: Say No to Palantir in Europe    URL Source: https://action.wemove.eu/sign/2026-03-palantir-petition-EN    Markdown Content:  # Say No to Palantir in Europe | WeMove Europe  [Go to main content](https://action.wemove.eu/sign/2026-03-palantir-petition-EN#main-content)[Skip to footer navigation](https://action.wemove.eu/sign/2026-03-palantir-petition-EN#footer)    It seems that your browser is blocking the popup window. Please try to disable the block for this page and try again.    [![Image 1:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The movement to reject Palantir in Europe is driven by ethical concerns regarding the company&amp;#39;s involvement in global conflicts and border enforcement, though some argue these criticisms are selective or mischaracterized &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564138&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; A powerful company enables genocide in Gaza, helps ICE separate families, and fuels Trump’s war with Iran. Ah yes, European issues&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564186&quot; title=&quot;Sure, Europe should absolutely be saying no to Palantir. However &amp;gt; A powerful company enables genocide in Gaza, helps ICE separate families, and fuels Trump’s war with Iran So does Google, so does Meta, so does Oracle. What do you think all that Palantir software runs on in the clouds? On Palantir&amp;#39;s own huge datacenters? They don&amp;#39;thave those. The huge bulk of it runs on it on clouds provided my Microsoft, Amazon, Google. Meta in particular causes such ridiculously larger amounts of societal…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564946&quot; title=&quot;Also &amp;#39;ICE separate[s] families&amp;#39; is such a ridiculous mischaracterization it makes me question all their other arguments.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users advocate for total European sovereignty through the adoption of local, open-source alternatives and the rejection of US-based cloud services, others contend that Palantir&amp;#39;s data-aggregation capabilities are inherently dangerous and should be legally forbidden rather than replicated &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564392&quot; title=&quot;Instantly signed up. I&amp;#39;m already moving most of my clients out of any US-based offering. Azure and Jira are sticky, but they&amp;#39;ll be out sooner or later.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564228&quot; title=&quot;I wonder what the alternative for Europe might be? A new project to launch, or is there an existing solution? Siren? Argon? In any case, it could be a great opportunity for Europe to create new jobs whilst increasing its sovereignty.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564276&quot; title=&quot;Palantir&amp;#39;s technology, as its own name suggests, is inherently dangerous, regardless of who controls it. The right alternative is to simply not build capabilities similar to Palantir in the EU - ideally, to legally forbid building them at all. This type of aggregated data flow simply gives too much control to whoever has access to it, and thus greatly harms democracy.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564444&quot; title=&quot;Ex-Colleagues are launching a startup right now: No US-Services from the beginning on, only OpenSource and this new EU-Office thingy. I think more companies will join the train? Esp new &amp;amp; smaller ones, for sure there is no option for bigCorp like ASML to be free of US-cloud, but maybe its gaining traction.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Skeptics of the movement suggest that focusing on Palantir is mere &amp;#34;virtue signaling&amp;#34; given the pervasive role of other US tech giants, noting that petitions often fail to achieve the impact that shifting financial capital does &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564186&quot; title=&quot;Sure, Europe should absolutely be saying no to Palantir. However &amp;gt; A powerful company enables genocide in Gaza, helps ICE separate families, and fuels Trump’s war with Iran So does Google, so does Meta, so does Oracle. What do you think all that Palantir software runs on in the clouds? On Palantir&amp;#39;s own huge datacenters? They don&amp;#39;thave those. The huge bulk of it runs on it on clouds provided my Microsoft, Amazon, Google. Meta in particular causes such ridiculously larger amounts of societal…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564085&quot; title=&quot;Petitions accomplish nothing. Money talks, talking doesn&amp;#39;t.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565731&quot; title=&quot;How do we differentiate between genuine empathy and love for the world and simple virtue signalling? If USA weren&amp;#39;t the one safeguarding (contentious but please read on) the world and its modern interests then we would end up with something much worse. If you only focus locally, it is quite easy to dismiss any form of killing, any form of surveillance and any form of inconvenience. This is &amp;#39;Defund the Police&amp;#39; meme all over again. I gain social points by showing my disgust against the killings…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techfixated.com/a-1977-time-capsule-voyager-1-runs-on-69-kb-of-memory-and-an-8-track-tape-recorder-4/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Voyager 1 runs on 69 KB of memory and an 8-track tape recorder&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techfixated.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564421&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;465 points · 181 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Launched in 1977, Voyager 1 continues to transmit interstellar data using 69 KB of memory and a specialized 8-track tape recorder, remaining operational 15 billion miles from Earth thanks to recent &amp;#34;miracle&amp;#34; engineering fixes that revived its long-dormant thrusters. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techfixated.com/a-1977-time-capsule-voyager-1-runs-on-69-kb-of-memory-and-an-8-track-tape-recorder-4/&quot; title=&quot;Title: A 1977 Time Capsule, Voyager 1 runs on 69 KB of memory and an 8-track tape recorder    URL Source: https://techfixated.com/a-1977-time-capsule-voyager-1-runs-on-69-kb-of-memory-and-an-8-track-tape-recorder-4/    Published Time: 2026-01-08T18:28:26+00:00    Markdown Content:  Right now, more than **15 billion miles from Earth**, a 48-year-old spacecraft is hurtling through interstellar space at 38,000 miles per hour.    It is the farthest human-made object in the universe.    It is sending back…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Voyager missions are celebrated as a pinnacle of human achievement, particularly for their longevity and the high-stakes engineering required to manage hardware with 23-hour communication latencies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565756&quot; title=&quot;Voyager 1 &amp;amp; 2 is one of my favourite human science achievements, not even so much from technology standpoint, as it&amp;#39;s relatively simple compared to what we have now (although that&amp;#39;s one of the charms), but just the fact that it&amp;#39;s so far away, it still more or less works long after the scheduled mission end time, we can communicate with it and despite all the modern technology progress, it would take decades to catch up. Absolutely amazing and inspiring!&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564679&quot; title=&quot;The thruster fix is the part that gets me. They sent a command that would either revive thrusters dead since 2004 or cause a catastrophic explosion, then waited 46 hours for the round trip with zero ability to intervene. That&amp;#39;s a production deployment with no rollback, no monitoring dashboard, and a 23-hour latency on your logs. They nailed it.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters frequently contrast Voyager’s 69 KB of memory with the perceived bloat of modern software, arguing that today’s web applications use excessive resources compared to the efficiency of these probes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564612&quot; title=&quot;Very depressing to see this next to the &amp;#39;LinkedIn uses 2.4GB of RAM&amp;#39; post.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564851&quot; title=&quot;Any website that uses more memory than Voyager 1 should be considered bloated.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565248&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s almost certainly less than 69KB of useful human-readable information on any given page.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While most view the mission as inspiring, a notable disagreement exists regarding the &amp;#34;recklessness&amp;#34; of broadcasting Earth&amp;#39;s location to the universe without global consent, potentially exposing humanity to hostile extraterrestrial forces &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566139&quot; title=&quot;They are dangerous and reckless. They were also done in the name of humanity, but without humanity’s consent. I despise the naive scientists who did them as much as those who brought the damocletian sword of nuclear weapons on us.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566203&quot; title=&quot;I assume you are against them due to the silent forest hypothesis? Better not announce ourselves, because anything out there might not be friendly to us?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ryelang.org/blog/posts/cognitive-dark-forest/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Cognitive Dark Forest&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ryelang.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566442&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;373 points · 174 comments · by kaycebasques&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#34;Cognitive Dark Forest&amp;#34; theory suggests that as AI makes execution cheap and centralized, creators will stop sharing ideas publicly to prevent large corporations from instantly absorbing and commodifying their innovations through data analysis and automated development. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ryelang.org/blog/posts/cognitive-dark-forest/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Cognitive Dark Forest    URL Source: https://ryelang.org/blog/posts/cognitive-dark-forest/    Published Time: 2026-03-27T00:00:00Z    Markdown Content:  _This is somewhat of a \_thought\_ experiment, thinking is still free, so let’s indulge._    ## thinkpad    2009, I bought a refurbished ThinkPad, installed Xubuntu, and started coding.    No permission was needed, no subscription. No gatekeeper, and no middleman taking its toll, between me and the future me.    Just idea, code editor, music in my…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on whether AI creates a &amp;#34;Dark Forest&amp;#34; where innovation must be hidden, with some arguing that execution remains the primary moat and that AI simply shifts the baseline of complexity rather than eliminating the difficulty of stealing customers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567950&quot; title=&quot;This article makes no real sense to me. &amp;gt;You think of something new and express it - through a prompt, through code, through a product - it enters the system. Your novel idea becomes training data. The sheer act of thinking outside the box makes the box bigger. This was the same before, if you had a novel idea and make a product out of it others follow. Especially for LLMs, they are not (till now) learning on the fly. Claude Opus 4.6 knowledge cut off was August 2025, so every idea you type in…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47568163&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This was the same before, if you had a novel idea and make a product out of it others follow. You&amp;#39;ve almost captured the full picture of it. If you have a great idea, it&amp;#39;s not going to be self-evidently enough of a great idea until you&amp;#39;ve proved it can make money.  That&amp;#39;s the hard part which comes at great personal, professional and financial risk. Algorithms are cheap.  Sure, they could use your LLM history to figure out what you did.  Or the LLM could just reason it out.  It could save them…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566837&quot; title=&quot;The thesis that in the past it was safe to share ideas and projects because the execution was hard, and that now things have changed because of AI is an interesting AI, but I wonder if it is really true. It certainly seems true that for small projects and relatively narrow scoped things that AI can replicate them easily. I&amp;#39;m thinking specifically about blog posts where people share their first steps and simple programs as they learn something new, like &amp;#39;here is how I set up a flask website&amp;#39;,…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see AI labs as &amp;#34;parasitic&amp;#34; entities that absorb and exploit the very innovation they stimulate &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567096&quot; title=&quot;Thanks, this helped crystallize something for me: the play the AI labs are making is anti-fragile (in the Nassim Taleb sense): &amp;gt; The very act of resisting feeds what you resist and makes it less fragile to future resistance. At least along certain dimensions. I don&amp;#39;t think the labs themselves are antifragile. Obviously we all know the labs are training on everything (so write/act the way you want future AIs to perceive you), but I hadn&amp;#39;t really focused on how they&amp;#39;re absorbing the innovation…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the real threat is a &amp;#34;Kessler syndrome&amp;#34; of digital garbage that makes public spaces unusable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47569030&quot; title=&quot;The best analogy I can think of (quite similar to this one) is that the internet is low Earth orbit and AI is the Kessler syndrome. We abandon the place not to hide ourselves, but because it is saturated with garbage, and anything you try to put up there will only result in even more garbage being generated, without any positive effect. The ideal solution would be to remove the garbage, but right now we can&amp;#39;t even detect it, let alone figure out a way to get rid of it. Besides, it&amp;#39;s a zero sum…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, skepticism exists regarding the long-term efficacy of these models, as performance often degrades post-launch due to cost-saving optimizations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567293&quot; title=&quot;Instead of anti-fragility, I&amp;#39;d point you to the law of requisite variety instead.  You&amp;#39;ll notice that all AI improvements are insanely good for a week or two after launch. Then you&amp;#39;ll see people stating that &amp;#39;models got worse&amp;#39;. What happened in fact is that people adapted to the tool, but the tool didn&amp;#39;t adapt anymore. We&amp;#39;re using AI as variety resistant and adaptable tools, but we miss the fact that most deployments nowadays do not adapt back to you as fast.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567509&quot; title=&quot;New models literally do get worse after launch, due to optimization. If you charted performance over time, it&amp;#39;d look like a sawtooth, with a regular performance drop during each optimization period. That&amp;#39;s the dirty secret with all of this stuff: &amp;#39;state of the art&amp;#39; models are unprofitable due to high cost of inference before optimization. After optimization they still perform okay, but way below SOTA. It&amp;#39;s like a knife that&amp;#39;s been sharpened until razor sharp, then dulled shortly after.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/29/us/angela-lipps-ai-facial-recognition&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Police used AI facial recognition to wrongly arrest TN woman for crimes in ND&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cnn.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563384&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;383 points · 164 comments · by ourmandave&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Tennessee woman was jailed for over five months after North Dakota police used AI facial recognition to wrongly identify her as a fraud suspect. Charges were dismissed after bank records proved she was in Tennessee during the crimes, prompting the department to revise its technology policies. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/29/us/angela-lipps-ai-facial-recognition&quot; title=&quot;Police used AI facial recognition to arrest a Tennessee woman for crimes committed in a state she says she’s never visited | CNN    A Tennessee grandmother spent more than five months in jail after police used an AI facial recognition tool to link her to crimes committed in North Dakota – a state she says she’d never been to before. Police in Fargo, North Dakota, have acknowledged “a few errors” in the case and pledged changes in their operations but stopped short of issuing a direct apology.    Ad…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary consensus among commenters is that this failure stems from a lack of investigative due diligence rather than the technology itself, as the facial recognition tool only suggests matches that detectives must then verify &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564070&quot; title=&quot;Without even looking at the AI part, I have a single question: Did anybody investigate? That&amp;#39;s it. Whether it&amp;#39;s AI that flagged her, or a witness who saw her, or her IP address appeared on the logs. Did anybody bothered to ask her &amp;#39;where were you the morning of july 10th between 3 and 4pm. But that&amp;#39;s not what happened, they saw the data and said &amp;#39;we got her&amp;#39;. But this is the worst part of the story: &amp;gt; And after her ordeal, she never plans to return to the state: “I’m just glad it’s over,” she…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564194&quot; title=&quot;This is a weak or misleading story about AI. First, the detective used the FaceSketchID system, which has been around since around 2014. It is not new or uniquely tied to modern AI. Second, the system only suggests possible matches. It is still up to the detective to investigate further and decide whether to pursue charges. And then it is up to court to issue the warrant. The real question is why she was held in jail for four months. That is the part that I do not understand. My understanding…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue the legal system lacks incentives for finding the truth, focusing instead on prosecution and leaving victims with little recourse beyond taxpayer-funded lawsuits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566465&quot; title=&quot;The thing about the legal system is there&amp;#39;s no incentive to investigate to find the truth. The incentive is to prosecte and prove the charges. Speaking from the experience of being falsely accused after calling 911 to stop a drunk woman from driving. The narrative they &amp;#39;investigated&amp;#39; was so obviously false, bodycam evidence directly contradicted multiple key facts. Officials are interested only seeking to prove the case. Thankfully the jury came to the right verdict.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564400&quot; title=&quot;In the US there are no consequences for people in power failing to follow procedures, laws or regulations - except for being told to stop doing whatever illegal thing they&amp;#39;re doing, and possibly getting sued way down the line, which gets paid by taxpayers.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable anecdotes highlight the devastating personal cost to the victim, who lost her home, car, and dog during her four-month incarceration &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564845&quot; title=&quot;It was worse than that, the reporting from an earlier story[0] ...Unable to pay her bills from jail, she lost her home, her car and even her dog. There is not a jury in the country that will side against the woman. I am not even sure who will make the best pop culture mashup - John Wick or a country song writer? (Also, what happened to journalism - no Oxford comma?) [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47356968&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, leading some to debate whether the fault lies with police negligence, the software&amp;#39;s inherent unreliability, or legal procedural errors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564194&quot; title=&quot;This is a weak or misleading story about AI. First, the detective used the FaceSketchID system, which has been around since around 2014. It is not new or uniquely tied to modern AI. Second, the system only suggests possible matches. It is still up to the detective to investigate further and decide whether to pursue charges. And then it is up to court to issue the warrant. The real question is why she was held in jail for four months. That is the part that I do not understand. My understanding…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563763&quot; title=&quot;Used incorrectly will lead to errors. Only one small little problem --- there is no way to tell if you are using it &amp;#39;correctly&amp;#39;. The only way to be sure is to not use it. Using it basically boils down to, &amp;#39;Do you feel lucky?&amp;#39;. The Fargo police didn&amp;#39;t get lucky in this case. And now the liability kicks in.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564848&quot; title=&quot;From reading more into the case, it seems the issue may be related to how her lawyer handled the case. They probably did “identity challenge” arguing that she is not the right person. But from Tennessee’s perspective, she was considered the correct person to be arrested, so there was no “mistaken identity” in their system. In other words, North Dakota Wanted person x and here is person x. Once a judge in North Dakota reviewed the full evidence (and found that person they issued warrant for…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/austin-weeks/miasma&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Miasma: A tool to trap AI web scrapers in an endless poison pit&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47561819&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;308 points · 221 comments · by LucidLynx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Miasma is a high-speed tool designed to combat AI web scrapers by trapping them in an endless cycle of poisoned training data and self-referential links. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/austin-weeks/miasma&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - austin-weeks/miasma: Trap AI web scrapers in an endless poison pit.    URL Source: https://github.com/austin-weeks/miasma    Markdown Content:  [![Image 1: No…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate over AI scrapers centers on whether public accessibility implies a right to mass-harvest data, with some arguing that &amp;#34;sharing&amp;#34; content does not grant companies the right to ignore copyright or profit from it &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563643&quot; title=&quot;I agree theft isn&amp;#39;t a good analogy, but there is something similar going on. I put my words out into the world as a form of sharing. I enjoy reading things others write and share freely, so I write so others might enjoy the things I write. But now the things I write and share freely are being used to put money in the bank accounts of the worst people on the planet. They are using my work in a way I don&amp;#39;t want it to be used. It makes me not want to share anymore.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563973&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If you put stuff out in public for anyone to use, then find out it&amp;#39;s used in a way you don&amp;#39;t like Nope. Copyright is a thing, licenses are a thing. Both are completely ignored by LLM companies, which was already proven in court, and for which they already had to pay billions in fines. Just because something is publicly accessible, that does not mean everybody is entitled to abuse it for everything they see fit.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users view scraping as a form of &amp;#34;theft&amp;#34; or a violation of social norms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47562951&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If you have a public website, they are already stealing your work. I have a public website, and web scrapers are stealing my work. I just stole this article, and you are stealing my comment. Thieves, thieves, and nothing but thieves!&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563094&quot; title=&quot;If someone hands out cookies in the supermarket, are you allowed to grab everything and leave?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that putting information in the public domain naturally invites such use &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563888&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;but there is something similar going on [...] No, what you&amp;#39;re basically describing is &amp;#39;I shared something but then I didn&amp;#39;t like how it ended up being used&amp;#39;. If you put stuff out in public for anyone to use, then find out it&amp;#39;s used in a way you don&amp;#39;t like, it&amp;#39;s your right to stop sharing, but it&amp;#39;s not &amp;#39;similar&amp;#39; to stealing beyond &amp;#39;I hate stealing&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563309&quot; title=&quot;Odd thing about cookies… they disappear after one serving. Websites are an endless stream of cookies. The analogy doesn’t hold.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Skeptics question the efficacy of &amp;#34;poisoning&amp;#34; tools like Miasma, noting that such tactics could trigger SEO penalties from Google or be easily mitigated by sophisticated scrapers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563641&quot; title=&quot;I dunno... it feels like the same approach as those people who tell you gleeful stories of how they kept a phone spammer on a call for 45 minutes: &amp;#39;That&amp;#39;ll teach &amp;#39;em, ha ha!&amp;#39; Do these types of techniques really work? I’m not convinced. Also, inserting hidden or misleading links is specifically a no-no for Google Search [0], who have this to say: We detect policy-violating practices both through automated systems and, as needed, human review that can result in a manual action. Sites that violate…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47562515&quot; title=&quot;Is there any evidence or hints that these actually work? It seems pretty reasonable that any scraper would already have mitigations for things like this as a function of just being on the internet.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47562820&quot; title=&quot;Why do this though? It&amp;#39;s like if someone was trying to &amp;#39;trap&amp;#39; search crawlers back in the early 2000s. Seems counterproductive&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/neovim/neovim/releases/tag/v0.12.0&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Neovim 0.12.0&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565316&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;338 points · 191 comments · by pawelgrzybek&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Neovim has released version 0.12.0, featuring a build powered by LuaJIT 2.1 and providing updated installation packages for Windows, macOS, and Linux across both x86_64 and ARM64 architectures. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/neovim/neovim/releases/tag/v0.12.0&quot; title=&quot;Release Nvim 0.12.0 · neovim/neovim    NVIM v0.12.0 Build type: Release LuaJIT 2.1.1774638290 Release notes Changelog (fixes + features) News (:help news in Nvim) Install Windows Zip Download nvim-win64.zip (or nvim-win-arm64.zip fo...    [Skip to content](#start-of-content)    ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [Sign in](/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fneovim%2Fneovim%2Freleases%2Ftag%2Fv0.12.0)    Appearance settings    * Platform      + AI CODE CREATION      - [GitHub CopilotWrite better…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The announcement of Neovim 0.12.0 has sparked significant excitement regarding the upcoming 0.13 roadmap, particularly the addition of native multiple cursors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565970&quot; title=&quot;Up next for 0.13: multiple cursors! I have no idea what I&amp;#39;d do with this feature but it sounds intriguing. https://neovim.io/roadmap/&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find macros more powerful, many argue that multiple cursors are more ergonomic for refactoring and provide immediate visual feedback that prevents errors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566299&quot; title=&quot;Multi cursor support in VSCode replaced 98% of my need for macros. Yes, macros are more powerful, but they are pretty easy to get wrong. With multiple cursors, it&amp;#39;s far easier to spot where your inputs don&amp;#39;t work out and adjust accordingly. Multi cursor is the feature that increased my productivity the most across the board.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566022&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not sure how people typically use neovim, but in Zed I find multiple cursors (especially combined with multiple file buffers) extremely ergonomic for refactoring quickly and easily where tools like find and replace or simple renaming doesn&amp;#39;t suffice. It lets you scan through and add cursors where you need them, then perform your edits across locations and even files all at once. It&amp;#39;s so nice that it played a significant role in me keeping Zed early on despite it missing a lot of extensions…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a growing debate over Neovim&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;batteries-included&amp;#34; philosophy; some users wish for more built-in features to reduce reliance on brittle plugins &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566496&quot; title=&quot;It probably goes against Vim tradition, culture and freedom to choose, but I wish they added even more built-in features (like Helix) that are currently implemented in competing and sometimes brittle plugins and have to be put together into also competing vim starter packs and distros of plugins and config files just to have a modern setup out of the box.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, while others remain skeptical of new native tools like the `vim.pack` manager compared to established community favorites like `lazy.nvim` &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565745&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; - d21b8c949ad7 pack: add built-in plugin manager `vim.pack Can someone try to sell me this over lazy.nvim? I asked Claude to convert lazy config to pack and I was not happy with it because how verbose it turned out&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, many developers are increasingly leveraging AI tools and SSH-based workflows to transition away from resource-heavy IDEs, citing improved performance and mobility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47569151&quot; title=&quot;I swapped to neovim and never looked back. I don&amp;#39;t even have vscode, jetbrains or anything similar installed anymore. AI has made it so so easy to get into neovim and make anything work no matter how obscure it is. The biggest benefit for me which I haven&amp;#39;t realized how good it is  with tmux and the low low memory usage. I mean I can keep EVERY project I work on open, quickly switch and maintain. No more 10gb memory usage on a SINGLE project, no more laggy remote access, no more dreading…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565814&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m using VIM - Vi IMproved 9.1. What am I missing? I&amp;#39;m kind of desperate to switch. Getting massive FOMO from colleagues using VS Code. But I really like using the keyboard to navigate. What should I do? Does NeoVim support Claude Code?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566070&quot; title=&quot;Is anyone using them vim with Claude or any of these coding tools? I want to, but I haven’t found a good workflow.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/40710&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Claude Code runs Git reset –hard origin/main against project repo every 10 mins&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567969&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;225 points · 154 comments · by mthwsjc_&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A user reported a critical bug in Claude Code that allegedly executes a hard git reset every 10 minutes, silently destroying uncommitted changes. Anthropic maintainers closed the issue, stating the behavior likely stems from user-initiated loops or automated prompts rather than an internal mechanism in the tool itself. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/40710&quot; title=&quot;Title: Claude is running git reset --hard origin/main in my project every 10 minutes    URL Source: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/40710    Published Time: 2026-03-29T22:12:21.000Z    Markdown Content:  # Claude is running git reset --hard origin/main in my project every 10 minutes · Issue #40710 · anthropics/claude-code    [Skip to content](https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/40710#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [](https://github.com/)    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some suggest the destructive behavior might be a one-off issue or the result of prompt injection &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47568842&quot; title=&quot;I think this post potentially mischaracterises what may be a one off issue for a certain person as if it were a broader problem. I&amp;#39;m guessing some context has been corrupted?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47568695&quot; title=&quot;Prompt injection?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others report similar experiences where the tool enters a &amp;#34;panic&amp;#34; loop—performing messy bulk replacements, encountering conflicts, and ultimately executing a hard reset to recover &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47569157&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not a one off issue - it has happened to me a few times. It has once even force pushed to github, which doesn&amp;#39;t allow branch protection for private personal projects. Here&amp;#39;s an example. 1) claude will stash (despite clear instructions never to do so). 2) claude will use sed to bulk replace (despite clear instructions never to do so). sed replacements make a mess and replaces far too many files. 3) claude restores the stash. Finds a lot of conflicts. Nothing runs. 4) claude decides it can&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that &amp;#34;telling&amp;#34; an LLM to avoid certain commands is ineffective and that users should instead rely on strict sandboxing or permission rulesets to prevent data loss &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47568804&quot; title=&quot;Not sure I understand, wouldn&amp;#39;t permissions prevent this? The user runs with `--dangerously-skip-permissions` so they can expect wild behaviour. They should run with permissions and a ruleset.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47569198&quot; title=&quot;When will you all learn that merely &amp;#39;telling&amp;#39; an LLM not to do something won&amp;#39;t deterministically prevent it from doing that thing? If you truly want it to never use those commands, you better be prepared to sandbox it to the point where it is completely unable to do the things you&amp;#39;re trying to stop.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant portion of the discussion also diverges into a technical debate regarding Hacker News&amp;#39;s typographical normalization of double hyphens into dashes in titles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47569152&quot; title=&quot;Let&amp;#39;s focus on the real issue here, which is that HN has apparently normalized the double hyphen in the title to an en dash--yes, an en dash, not even an em dash.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47569319&quot; title=&quot;I agree that it should be left as a double hyphen, but an en dash is far more appropriate considering the decades-long precedent set by LaTeX (and continued by Typst).&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47569383&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a command line argument.  The undeniably correct way to render it is with two minus signs[1] and absolutely not something non-ascii. [1] Not strictly a hyphen, which has its own unicode point (0x2010) outside of ascii.  Unicode embraced the ambiguity by calling this point (0x2d) &amp;#39;HYPHEN-MINUS&amp;#39; formally, but really its only unique typographic usage is to represent subtraction.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/mar/29/full-network-clitoral-nerves-mapped-out-first-time-women-pelvic-surgery&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Full network of clitoral nerves mapped out for first time&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theguardian.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564245&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;265 points · 100 comments · by onei&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Researchers have created the first 3D map of the clitoral nerve network, a breakthrough that corrects anatomical misconceptions and could improve surgical outcomes for pelvic reconstruction and gender reassignment. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/mar/29/full-network-clitoral-nerves-mapped-out-first-time-women-pelvic-surgery&quot; title=&quot;Title: Full network of clitoral nerves mapped out for first time    URL Source: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/mar/29/full-network-clitoral-nerves-mapped-out-first-time-women-pelvic-surgery    Published Time: 2026-03-29T11:02:16.000Z    Markdown Content:  # Full network of clitoral nerves mapped out for first time | Women&amp;#39;s health | The Guardian  [Skip to main…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a debate over the historical erasure of the clitoris from medical textbooks, with some arguing its removal from *Gray’s Anatomy* between 1947 and 1995 reflects a &amp;#34;cynical&amp;#34; cultural bias or maliciousness rather than simple ignorance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565298&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; the clitoris did not even make it into standard anatomy textbooks until the 38th edition of Gray’s Anatomy was published in 1995. This seemed surprising, as it hews too close to an annoying meme in feminism and history generally, that people in prior eras were idiots. And it turns out to be wrong. The clitoris was in Gray&amp;#39;s Anatomy until 1947, when it was removed by the editor Charles Goss for the 25th edition. See https://projects.huffingtonpost.com/projects/cliteracy/embed... Indeed, the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567532&quot; title=&quot;Being removed for versions 25 to 38… honestly confirms the feminist narrative of some people being idiots, though. Like, imagine documentation on object oriented programming being removed because it offended some functional programming folks.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47568051&quot; title=&quot;I think it communicates maliciousness not idiocy&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users view this erasure as confirmation of systemic prejudice against women, others caution against dismissing past eras as &amp;#34;idiotic,&amp;#34; noting that contemporary biases can be equally subtle and complex &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565500&quot; title=&quot;I don’t know about “idiots” but bias towards women was obviously real and prevalent. Treating the idea that that might have influenced medical literature as a “meme” is slightly bizarre to me.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565553&quot; title=&quot;The meme is that before [insert your contemporary period] people were so backwards  that they would miss something like the clitoris entirely. The meme isn&amp;#39;t that people and cultures were prejudiced or biased, but that they were prejudiced in an idiotic way. If you believe that&amp;#39;s how prejudice works, then you&amp;#39;ll be utterly blind to much contemporary prejudice. EDIT: Relatedly, The Guardian article sites the statistics about female genital mutilation. And you might think, how could people in…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the thread touches on the high global prevalence of female genital mutilation (FGM) and the surprising finding that reconstruction surgery may yield negative outcomes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565129&quot; title=&quot;Page 7 [0] of the report seems to indicate that FGM reconstruction actually seems to have negative outcomes post-surgery. I&amp;#39;m surprised by this. I&amp;#39;m also shocked to see how prolific FGM is too (230 million women?!). [0]: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.18.712572v1...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://gladeart.com/blog/the-bot-situation-on-the-internet-is-actually-worse-than-you-could-imagine-heres-why&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The bot situation on the internet is worse than you could imagine&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (gladeart.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564469&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;205 points · 155 comments · by ohjeez&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of sophisticated automated systems is significantly increasing non-human traffic and activity across the internet, complicating digital interactions and data integrity. &lt;a href=&quot;https://gladeart.com/blog/the-bot-situation-on-the-internet-is-actually-worse-than-you-could-imagine-heres-why&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;web.archive.org&amp;amp;#x2F;web&amp;amp;#x2F;20260329052632&amp;amp;#x2F;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;gladeart.com&amp;amp;#x2F;blog&amp;amp;#x2F;the-bot-situation-on-the-internet-is-actually-worse-than-you-could-imagine-heres-why&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;web.archive.org&amp;amp;#x2F;web&amp;amp;#x2F;20260329052632&amp;amp;#x2F;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;gladeart....&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of aggressive, distributed scraping botnets—often attributed to AI companies or data brokers—is reportedly overwhelming websites and threatening their financial viability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566064&quot; title=&quot;AI companies and notably AI scrapers are a cancer that is destroying what&amp;#39;s left of the WWW. I was hit with a pretty substantial botnet &amp;#39;distributed scraping&amp;#39; attack yesterday. - About 400,000 different IP addresses over about 3 hours - Mostly residential IP addresses - Valid and unique user agents and referrers - Each IP address would make only a few requests with a long delay in between requests It would hit the server hard until the server became slow to respond, then it would back off for…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565312&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; These bots are almost certainly scraping data for AI training; normal bad actors don&amp;#39;t have funding for millions of unique IPs thrown at a page. They probably belong to several different companies. Perhaps they sell their scraped data to AI companies, or they are AI companies themselves. We can&amp;#39;t tell, but we can guess since there aren&amp;#39;t all that many large AI corporations out there. Is the theory here that OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, xAI, Qwen, Z.ai etc are all either running bad scrapers via…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some site owners find Proof-of-Work (PoW) tools like Anubis highly effective at deterring automated traffic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564871&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m surprised at the effectiveness of simple PoW to stop practically all activity. I&amp;#39;ll implement Anubis at low difficulty for all my projects and leave a decent llms.txt referenced in my sitemap and robots.txt so LLMs can still get relevant data for my site while.keeping bad bots out. I&amp;#39;m getting thousands of requests from China that have really increased costs, glad it seems the fix is rather easy.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565423&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;It&amp;#39;s less proof of work and just annoying to users, and feel good to whoever added it to their site, this is being disproved in the article posted: &amp;gt;And so Anubis was enabled in the tar pit at difficulty 1 (lowest setting) when requests were pouring in 24/7. Before it was enabled, it was getting several hundred-thousand requests each day. As soon as Anubis became active in there, it decreased to about 11 requests after 24 hours, most just from curious humans. apparently it does more than…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, critics argue these methods are trivial for bots to bypass using LLM-generated code while remaining &amp;#34;ridiculous&amp;#34; and slow for legitimate human users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565049&quot; title=&quot;I’ve been sitting on this page for two minutes and it’s still not sure whether I’m a bot lol. What did I do in a past life to deserve this :(&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565078&quot; title=&quot;After 2 minutes at 150 kHashes on mobile, I finally see the first pixel of the progress bar filling up. Seems like it will take hours or a day to finish. Some estimate would have been nice.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565098&quot; title=&quot;Ironically I used a LLM to write a bypass for this ridiculous tool, doing hashing in a browser makes no sense, Claude&amp;#39;s very bad implementation of it in C does tens of megahash a second and passes all of the challenges nearly instantly. It took about 5 minutes for Claude to write that, and it&amp;#39;s not even a particularly fast implementation, but it beats the pants off doing string comparisons for every loop in JavaScript which is what the Anubis tool does. for (; ;) {          const hashBuffer =…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. This friction has sparked a debate between those advocating for government digital IDs to verify humanity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47564895&quot; title=&quot;This is why I see (well managed) government digital IDs as sensible moves. Apart from DDOS attacks, if bots have to “prove” who they are on each request it seems like a win-win. I may be missing something of course&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt; and those who view such measures as an authoritarian threat to fundamental online anonymity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565080&quot; title=&quot;If you want “papers, please” every time you back out of your driveway or go beyond your government-assigned oblast, then your suggestion is the digital version of the physical authoritarian nightmare that was imposed by totalitarianist regimes throughout history. People have a right to complete anonymity, and should be able to go across the majority of the Internet just as they can go across most of the country. That’s what you are missing. Don’t get me wrong, I am also in favour of a single…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://herbsutter.com/2026/03/29/c26-is-done-trip-report-march-2026-iso-c-standards-meeting-london-croydon-uk/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;C++26 is done ISO C++ standards meeting, Trip Report&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (herbsutter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565365&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;201 points · 157 comments · by pjmlp&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The ISO C++ committee has completed technical work on C++26, introducing major features including compile-time reflection, language contracts, and significant memory safety enhancements. The update also includes the `std::execution` framework for concurrency, while the committee now shifts focus toward further safety improvements for C++29. &lt;a href=&quot;https://herbsutter.com/2026/03/29/c26-is-done-trip-report-march-2026-iso-c-standards-meeting-london-croydon-uk/&quot; title=&quot;Title: C++26 is done! — Trip report: March 2026 ISO C++ standards meeting (London Croydon, UK)    URL Source: https://herbsutter.com/2026/03/29/c26-is-done-trip-report-march-2026-iso-c-standards-meeting-london-croydon-uk/    Published Time: 2026-03-29T16:24:16+00:00    Markdown Content:  # C++26 is done! — Trip report: March 2026 ISO C++ standards meeting (London Croydon, UK) – Sutter’s Mill    [Skip to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The C++26 update has sparked debate over the inclusion of &amp;#34;Contracts,&amp;#34; with critics labeling them a &amp;#34;bloated committee design&amp;#34; that adds unnecessary complexity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566053&quot; title=&quot;I am somewhat dismayed that contracts were accepted. It feels like piling on ever more complexity to a language which has already surpassed its complexity budget, and given that the feature comes with its own set of footguns I&amp;#39;m not sure that it is justified. Here&amp;#39;s a quote from Bjarne, &amp;gt;  So go back about one year, and we could vote about it before it got into the standard, and some of us voted no. Now we have a much harder problem. This is part of the standard proposal. Do we vote against the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, while proponents argue they are a vital step toward &amp;#34;correct-by-design&amp;#34; software and static proof integration &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566197&quot; title=&quot;I can’t speak to the C++ contract design — it’s possible bad choices were made. But contracts in general are absolutely exactly what C++ needs for the next step of its evolution. Programming languages used for correct-by-design software (Ada, C++, Rust) need to enable deep integration with proof assistants to allow showing arbitrary properties statically instead of via testing, and contracts are /the/ key part of that — see e.g. Ada Spark.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566232&quot; title=&quot;The people who did contracts are aware of ada/spark and some have experience using it. Only time will tell if it works in c++ but they at least did all they could to give it a chance. Note that this is not the end of contrats. This is a minimun viable start that they intend to add to but the missing parts are more complex.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant skepticism remains regarding the language&amp;#39;s build ecosystem, as many users believe C++ is being &amp;#34;killed&amp;#34; by the lack of a unified package manager like Rust&amp;#39;s Cargo &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565973&quot; title=&quot;The best thing the C++ WG could do is to spend an entire release cycle working on modules and packaging. It&amp;#39;s nice to have new features, but what is really killing C++ is Cargo. I don&amp;#39;t think a new generation of developers are going to be inspired to learn a language where you can&amp;#39;t simply `cargo add` whatever you need and instead have to go through hell to use a dependency.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566085&quot; title=&quot;Agreed, arcane cmake configs and or bash build scripts are genuinely off-putting. Also cpp &amp;#39;equivalents&amp;#39; of cargo which afaik are conan and vcpkg are not default and required much more configuring in comparison with cargo. Atleast this was my experience few years ago.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566351&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s fundamentally different; Rust entirely rejects the notion of a stable ABI, and simply builds everything from source. C and C++ are usually stuck in that antiquated thinking that you should build a module, package it into some libraries, install/export the library binaries and associated assets, then import those in other projects. That makes everything slow, inefficient, and widely dangerous. There are of course good ways of building C++, but those are the exception rather than the…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, there is a lack of consensus on the future of Modules; some see them as a failed concept &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565909&quot; title=&quot;No. Modules are a failed idea. Really really hard for me to see them becoming mainstream at this point.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, while others question if recent small changes will be enough to finally drive widespread adoption and replace header files &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565754&quot; title=&quot;Biggest open question is whether the small changes to the module system in this standard will actually lead to more widespread adoption&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566642&quot; title=&quot;As long as programmers still have to deal with header files, all of this is lipstick on a pig.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bmj.com/content/387/bmj-2024-082194&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Alzheimer&amp;#39;s disease mortality among taxi and ambulance drivers (2024)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bmj.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559481&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;212 points · 134 comments · by bookofjoe&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A US study of nearly nine million death certificates found that taxi and ambulance drivers have the lowest risk-adjusted Alzheimer’s disease mortality among 443 occupations. Researchers suggest the frequent spatial and navigational processing required by these roles may offer neurological protection, as similar trends were not seen in other transportation jobs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bmj.com/content/387/bmj-2024-082194&quot; title=&quot;Alzheimer’s disease mortality among taxi and ambulance drivers: population based cross sectional study    Objective To analyze mortality attributed to Alzheimer’s disease among taxi drivers and ambulance drivers, occupations that demand frequent spatial and navigational processing, compared with other occupations. Design Population based cross-sectional study. Setting Use of death certificates from the National Vital Statistics System in the United States, which were linked to occupation, 1…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Research indicates that ambulance and taxi drivers have a 3x lower Alzheimer’s mortality rate than the general population, a phenomenon attributed to the intense spatial reasoning required for navigation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559685&quot; title=&quot;The rate of fatality for Alzheimer’s among ambulance and taxi drivers is 3x lower than the general population. This is not observed in other transportation-related careers. The connection is believed to be the spatial reasoning involved in routing. No causative link is suggested.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47560179&quot; title=&quot;What are some possibilities? 1. Those with spatial reasoning are less likely to develop Alzheimers      2. Ambo and Taxi drivers are less likely (for some reason) to develop Alzheimers AND their work leads them to develop good spatial reasoning. Any others?  One consideration is that those with jobs requiring long periods of concentration drink less.  Among other things.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters debate whether this is a protective effect of lifelong mental mapping or a result of self-selection, where those with superior spatial abilities enter these fields &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47560179&quot; title=&quot;What are some possibilities? 1. Those with spatial reasoning are less likely to develop Alzheimers      2. Ambo and Taxi drivers are less likely (for some reason) to develop Alzheimers AND their work leads them to develop good spatial reasoning. Any others?  One consideration is that those with jobs requiring long periods of concentration drink less.  Among other things.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559701&quot; title=&quot;I immediately go to these two thoughts: - Is significant life-long usage of real-time mental spatial navigation protective? - Are those who end up in these positions self-selected for better than average real-time mental spatial navigation and that above average performance correlates with protection against Alzheimer&amp;#39;s.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant counter-argument suggests &amp;#34;healthy worker&amp;#34; bias: individuals may quit these professions at the earliest onset of cognitive decline because getting lost is a primary symptom of the disease &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47560609&quot; title=&quot;- Drivers with early symptoms of Alzheimer’s struggled to remain effective and changed profession&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559763&quot; title=&quot;One of the first signs that a somebody has Alzheimer&amp;#39;s is that they&amp;#39;ll get lost. E.g., they&amp;#39;ve been attending church on Thursdays nights at the same chapel for 15 years, but suddenly they forgot how to get home after a recent service. Part of the reason for the findings in the current study is that people quit those professions when they feel themselves starting to struggle.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable anecdotes highlight the extreme mental load of pre-GPS navigation, such as memorizing thousands of streets or managing complex map books while driving &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47560314&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The connection is believed to be the spatial reasoning involved in routing. This is triggering me lol.  I was a Paramedic for 10 years and 3 of those years were before GPS existed and we had these awful 900 page 5&amp;#39; thick things we had to wield on the fly called Map Books.   It was part of our probation period testing and they would time us to pick out the routes reliably within a certain deadline or not graduate from being a probie. While your partner drove to the call you&amp;#39;d put the book on…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47560857&quot; title=&quot;In a similar vein, to drive a black taxi in London you have to pass The Knowledge of London exam which requires becoming a human routing database for over twenty thousand streets and landmarks.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users speculate that similar cognitive benefits might eventually be observed in populations that navigate complex open-world video games &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47560937&quot; title=&quot;Will we see a drop in alzheimers when the open world gaming population reaches that age? I mean, I can not just navigate my city, but multiple worlds!&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559688&quot; title=&quot;Would love to see a study looking at people who spend significant time in video games that require spatial navigation. That could even be a form of therapy after diagnosis (which seems to become easier with biomarkers).&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tobiasberg.net/posts/my-macbook-keyboard-is-broken-and-its-insanely-expensive-to-fix/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;My MacBook keyboard is broken and it&amp;#39;s insanely expensive to fix&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tobiasberg.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566143&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;130 points · &lt;strong&gt;154 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by TobiasBerg&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After a broken arrow key led to a €730 repair quote due to Apple&amp;#39;s non-modular keyboard design, a MacBook Pro owner opted for a software workaround and expressed support for more repairable hardware and stricter government regulations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tobiasberg.net/posts/my-macbook-keyboard-is-broken-and-its-insanely-expensive-to-fix/&quot; title=&quot;Title: My Macbook Keyboard is Broken and it&amp;#39;s Insanely Expensive to Fix    URL Source: https://tobiasberg.net/posts/my-macbook-keyboard-is-broken-and-its-insanely-expensive-to-fix/    Markdown Content:  # My Macbook Keyboard is Broken and it&amp;#39;s Insanely Expensive to Fix | Tobias Berg  [←Home](https://tobiasberg.net/)[Follow](https://tobiasberg.net/follow/)[Projects](https://tobiasberg.net/projects/)[Archive](https://tobiasberg.net/posts/)[About](https://tobiasberg.net/about/)  # My Macbook Keyboard is…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether government regulation or consumer choice is the best path toward laptop repairability, with some arguing that mandates like those in the EU are more effective than decades of &amp;#34;finger-wagging&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567136&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; No, this is a bad solution. You didn&amp;#39;t say why this is a bad solution.  The government mandates that cars get safer every year and fatalities are down 78% from the 1960s.  Whenever government regulates things to benefit people, people tend to benefit. &amp;gt; One of the things macbook users praise the most is &amp;#39;build quality&amp;#39;, which often means the solidity of the device, lack of flex, etc. It seems like the Macbook Neo has a lot of those properties as well for a very inexpensive device that is…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567502&quot; title=&quot;Decades of HN users finger wagging and suggesting FOSS hardware has progressed society nowhere. 12 months from EU mandatory replaceable batteries and products across the industry are being redesigned with repairability, usb-c, and user friendly designs. It’s time to accept regulation actually does work when you have a competent government.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Opponents of regulation contend that repairability often involves trade-offs in &amp;#34;build quality,&amp;#34; thickness, and weight, suggesting that users who value repairability should simply purchase from brands like Framework or Lenovo &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567000&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Here’s hoping governments regulate laptop manufacturers to actually make repairable machines in the future. No, this is a bad solution. If you want a repairable machine, buy one. They exist. Others have already mentioned Framework, but there are other options that aren&amp;#39;t that far down the spectrum either. One of the things macbook users praise the most is &amp;#39;build quality&amp;#39;, which often means the solidity of the device, lack of flex, etc. These quality features are, in part, achieved by the same…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567179&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It seems like the Macbook Neo has a lot of those properties as well for a very inexpensive device that is extremely easy to repair. It&amp;#39;s slightly worse, slightly more flex, thicker and heavier vs an Air in spite of having a smaller battery and more empty space. It&amp;#39;s all trade offs. If you want repairable, please buy a Framework or Lenovo. Backseat industrial designing through legislation is not the answer.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics point out that switching brands requires abandoning macOS, and that repairable alternatives can be more expensive while offering inferior hardware performance compared to Apple&amp;#39;s current offerings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566944&quot; title=&quot;Framework Laptop is more expensive than a Macbook Air with all around worse hardware.  For a framework 13 I&amp;#39;d have to pay 1900€ with a 16GB setup. For 1450 I get a MBA with 24GB ram. Similar with a dell or lenovo who get smoked in performance comparisons. It might still be worth it for those who hugely value open source and repairability but as for value I think its save to say that Apple is currently in a league of their own. Even if the altest os update is a flop. Also, the Macbook has…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567316&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If you want a repairable machine, buy one. They exist. Others have already mentioned Framework But that means Windows or Linux, not macOS. There&amp;#39;s serious trade-offs that you&amp;#39;re dismissing because you personally don&amp;#39;t need macOS, but that&amp;#39;s not the case for everyone. #hn-bingo&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users have sworn off Apple due to &amp;#34;customer hostile practices,&amp;#34; others argue that AppleCare and the longevity of modern MacBooks make them a viable long-term value &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566694&quot; title=&quot;My first computer was a Mac Plus. I got to experience Apple&amp;#39;s customer hostile practices. Many years ago l decided never to buy an Apple product again.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566938&quot; title=&quot;AppleCare is honestly a great deal, especially for laptops. M1 Macbook Pros from 2020 are humming along just fine for regular people who see no reason to upgrade. The future is now, old man.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.gjlondon.com/blog/ai-agents-could-make-free-software-matter-again/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Coding Agents Could Make Free Software Matter Again&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (gjlondon.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47568028&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;141 points · 126 comments · by rogueleaderr&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AI coding agents are revitalizing the free software movement by allowing non-technical users to modify source code through AI proxies, bypassing the limitations of closed SaaS models and making the &amp;#34;four freedoms&amp;#34; a practical capability rather than a theoretical right. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.gjlondon.com/blog/ai-agents-could-make-free-software-matter-again/&quot; title=&quot;Title: AI Agents Could Make Free Software Matter Again, George London    URL Source: https://www.gjlondon.com/blog/ai-agents-could-make-free-software-matter-again/    Markdown Content:  # AI Agents Could Make Free Software Matter Again | George London    [Skip to content](https://www.gjlondon.com/blog/ai-agents-could-make-free-software-matter-again/#content)    [George London](https://www.gjlondon.com/)    Software Raconteur    Menu    *   [About](https://www.gjlondon.com/)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The integration of AI into software development has sparked a debate over whether it revitalizes or devalues free software, with some arguing that open-source infrastructure remains the essential foundation for all modern AI tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47568107&quot; title=&quot;Free software has never mattered more. All the infrastructure that runs the whole AI-over-the-internet juggernaut is    essentially all open source. Heck, even Claude Code would be far less useful without grep, diff, git, head, etc., etc., etc. And one can easily see a day where something like a local sort Claude Code talking to Open Weight and Open Source models is the core dev tool.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47569466&quot; title=&quot;Open source has never been more alive for me. I have been publishing low key for years, and AI has expanded that capability more than 100 fold, in all directions. I had previously published packages in multiple languages but recently started to cut back to just one manually. But now with AI, I started to expand languages again. Instead of feeling constrained by toolchains I feel comfortable with, I feel freedom to publish more and more. The benefits to publishing AI generated code as open…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, many contributors feel exploited, noting that while their code trains the models that generate corporate profit, they receive no royalties and may even face job displacement &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47568366&quot; title=&quot;Having over a decade of open source software I&amp;#39;ve written freely available online, I actually really appreciate the value that AI &amp;amp;&amp;amp; LLMs have provided me. The thing that leaves a bad taste in my mouth is the fact that my works were likely included in the training data and, if it doesn&amp;#39;t violate my licenses (GNU 2/3), it certainly feels against the spirit of what I intended when distributing my works. I was made redundant recently &amp;#39;due to AI&amp;#39; (questionable) and it feels like my works in some…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47568525&quot; title=&quot;Me too, and I use LLMs often for personal and professional work. Knowing that colleagues are burning through $700/day worth of tokens, and a small fraction of those tokens were likely derived from my work while I get made redundant is a bit shite.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant disagreement regarding the future of the ecosystem: some fear AI will lead to &amp;#34;vibe-coded&amp;#34; bespoke applications that bypass traditional open-source maintenance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47568117&quot; title=&quot;I think the opposite. It will make all software matter less. If trendlines continue... It will be faster for AI to vibe code said software to your customized specifications than to sign up for a SaaS and learn it. &amp;#39;Claude, create a project management tool that simplifies jira, customize it to my workflow.&amp;#39; So a lot of apps will actually become closed source personalized builds.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47568319&quot; title=&quot;I’m not so sure… what I see as more likely is that coding agents will just strip parts from open source libraries to build bespoke applications for users. Users will be ecstatic because they get exactly what they want and they don’t have to worry about upstream supply chain attacks. Maintainers get screwed because no one contributes back to the main code base. In the end open source software becomes critical to the ecosystem, but gets none of the credit.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, while others believe the legal &amp;#34;spirit&amp;#34; of licenses like the GPL should technically obligate AI companies to release their models under similar open terms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47568412&quot; title=&quot;I think there&amp;#39;s no meaningful case by the letter of the law that use of training data that include GPL-licensed software in models that comprise the core component of modern LLMs doesn&amp;#39;t obligate every producer of such models to make both the models and the software stack supporting them available under the same terms. Of course, it also seems clear in the present landscape that the law often depends more on the convenience of the powerful than its actual construction and intent, but I would…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://adlrocha.substack.com/p/adlrocha-what-if-ai-doesnt-need-more&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What if AI doesn&amp;#39;t need more RAM but better math?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (adlrocha.substack.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47561297&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;168 points · 89 comments · by adlrocha&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google has introduced TurboQuant, a two-stage compression algorithm that reduces AI memory usage by 6x and increases performance up to 8x without sacrificing accuracy. By using polar coordinates and error correction, the data-oblivious method significantly eases the hardware bottlenecks associated with large language model inference and vector storage. &lt;a href=&quot;https://adlrocha.substack.com/p/adlrocha-what-if-ai-doesnt-need-more&quot; title=&quot;Title: @adlrocha - What if AI doesn’t need more RAM but better math?    URL Source: https://adlrocha.substack.com/p/adlrocha-what-if-ai-doesnt-need-more    Published Time: 2026-03-29T08:03:03+00:00    Markdown Content:  [![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While improved mathematical efficiency could reduce memory requirements, many argue this will not lower overall demand; instead, companies will likely use the freed-up capacity to scale up models or run more instances &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47561510&quot; title=&quot;We will not see memory demand decrease because this will simply allow AI companies to run more instances. They still want an infinite amount of memory at the moment, no matter how AI improves.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47562574&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; applying this compression algorithm at scale may significantly relax the memory bottleneck issue. I don’t think they’re going to downsize though, I think the big players are just going to use the freed up memory for more workflows or larger models because the big players want to scale up. It’s a cat and mouse race for the best models.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47562266&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If models become more efficient Then we can make them even bigger.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a sharp disagreement over the future of local AI, with some envisioning a shift away from the &amp;#34;mainframe era&amp;#34; toward edge devices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47561701&quot; title=&quot;If models become more efficient we will move more of the work to local devices instead of using SaaS models. We’re still in the mainframe era of LLM.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, while others cite prohibitive electricity costs and corporate gatekeeping as barriers to widespread local adoption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47562203&quot; title=&quot;The hyperscalers do not want us running models at the edge and they will spend infinite amounts of circular fake money to ensure hardware remains prohibitively expensive forever.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47562705&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t see how we&amp;#39;ll ever get to widespread local LLM. The power efficiency alone is a strong enough pressure to use centralized model providers. My 3090 running 24b or 32b models is fun, but I know I&amp;#39;m paying way more per token in electricity, on top of lower quality tokens. It&amp;#39;s fun to run them locally, but for anything actually useful it&amp;#39;s cheaper to just pay API prices currently.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, some participants have raised concerns regarding the technical validity of the underlying research, pointing to alleged inaccuracies in the paper&amp;#39;s claims &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563166&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;The TurboQuant paper (ICLR 2026) contains serious issues in how it describes RaBitQ, including incorrect technical claims and misleading theory/experiment comparisons. We flagged these issues to the authors before submission. They acknowledged them, but chose not to fix them. The paper was later accepted and widely promoted by Google, reaching tens of millions of views. We’re speaking up now because once a misleading narrative spreads, it becomes much harder to correct. We’ve written a public…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.washingtonpost.com/travel/2026/03/28/tsa-line-sitters/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;TSA lines are so out of control that travelers are hiring line-sitters&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (washingtonpost.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563007&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;104 points · &lt;strong&gt;129 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by bookofjoe&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.washingtonpost.com/travel/2026/03/28/tsa-line-sitters/&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current TSA crisis has highlighted a &amp;#34;pay-to-play&amp;#34; system where wealthy travelers use concierge services to bypass lines via staff-only checkpoints, a practice critics liken to sanctioned bribery &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563408&quot; title=&quot;From the last few paragraphs: &amp;gt; There is an official way for travelers to bypass long TSA waits if they’re willing to spend: hiring concierge services to escort them through security. &amp;gt; Perq Soleil is an airport arrival and departure assistance service that can help travelers through TSA in about a minute flat by accessing alternative lines usually reserved for airport staff and airline personnel. The company — which operates in more than 300 airports and 150 countries — charges a base rate…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue private jet passengers should remain exempt from screening because they aren&amp;#39;t &amp;#34;common carriers,&amp;#34; others contend that the TSA&amp;#39;s core mission of preventing hijackings applies to any aircraft capable of being used as a weapon &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563547&quot; title=&quot;Why should private plane passengers be subject to TSA? TSA (paid for by you and me by the way, not for free) exists to protect the public from harm, on public flights by common carriers. It used to be contracted by airlines themselves. Unless you are the most extreme of pro-seatbelt law people, it would make little sense for TSA to screen anyone on a private plane manifest unless the client asked them to.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563637&quot; title=&quot;No, the TSA exists because 19 people hijacked 4 flights and succeeded in crashing 3 of them into various important buildings in the US on 9/11/2001. Private planes are just as capable of crashing into buildings as commercial jets. The TSA has picked up some ancillary public safety functions over the years, but their raison d&amp;#39;etre is to prevent hijackings.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. The funding bottleneck is attributed to a complex federal process where user fees cannot be spent without Congressional appropriation, leading to partisan gridlock over DHS funding and border policy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563444&quot; title=&quot;I don’t even understand why this is an issue, because TSA screening is funded through user fees. There’s a line item of $5.60 per one-way ticket for exactly this that’s separate from airfare and other fees. ( https://www.tsa.gov/for-industry/security-fees ) If this is so, why does Congress have to fund the program? Why not pass the funds through directly to the agency?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563617&quot; title=&quot;The question itself feels like it calls for &amp;#39;Schoolhouse Rock&amp;#39; level basics about how the federal government works. The federal government does not work like a private escrow account where a fee collected for X automatically goes to Y. Tax revenue comes in to the Treasury, and Congress decides what agencies are allowed to spend. So even if TSA screening is funded in part by a per-ticket user fee, TSA still does not get to just collect that money and use it directly. Congress has to authorize…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47563372&quot; title=&quot;Yesterday morning, CNN: &amp;gt; In a remarkable 24 hours in Washington, House Republicans snubbed a bipartisan funding deal cut by their own Senate GOP counterparts and instead approved an entirely different plan — prolonging the Department of Homeland Security shutdown. &amp;gt; Then, they left town. It&amp;#39;s obvious what&amp;#39;s happening. https://lite.cnn.com/2026/03/27/politics/dhs-shutdown-fundin...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://crackr.dev/vibe-coding-failures&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The &amp;quot;Vibe Coding&amp;quot; Wall of Shame&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (crackr.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566491&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;122 points · 72 comments · by wa5ina&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Crackr AI’s &amp;#34;Vibe Coding&amp;#34; directory documents over 32 major production failures and 35 CVEs caused by AI-generated code, including a 6-hour Amazon outage and massive data deletions at companies like SaaStr and DataTalks.Club. &lt;a href=&quot;https://crackr.dev/vibe-coding-failures&quot; title=&quot;Title: Vibe Coding Failures: Documented AI Code Incidents | Crackr AI    URL Source: https://crackr.dev/vibe-coding-failures    Markdown Content:  # Vibe Coding Failures: Documented AI Code Incidents | Crackr AI    [Crackr AI](https://crackr.dev/)    [Jobs](https://crackr.dev/jobs)    Interview Prep expand_more    [Company Questions](https://crackr.dev/companies)[Study Plans](https://crackr.dev/study-plans)[LeetCode Patterns](https://crackr.dev/leetcode-patterns)[Interview…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Critics argue that the &amp;#34;Wall of Shame&amp;#34; lacks rigor, noting that several listed incidents—such as the LiteLLM credential theft and certain Amazon outages—lack credible evidence linking them to &amp;#34;vibe coding&amp;#34; or AI-generated errors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566778&quot; title=&quot;For CVE-2026-0755, that&amp;#39;s a vulnerability in gemini-mcp-tool. gemini-mcp-tool&amp;#39;s Github repo says &amp;#39;This is an unofficial, third-party tool and is not affiliated with, endorsed, or sponsored by Google.&amp;#39; but this list shows the Google logo next to the vulnerability. Also, it&amp;#39;s not entirely obvious to me that the vulnerability was introduced by vibe coding. https://github.com/jamubc/gemini-mcp-tool Disclosure: I work at Google, but not on anything related to this.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566846&quot; title=&quot;Why is the LiteLLM incident on there? The linked article for that one is a 404. I didn&amp;#39;t read any credible arguments suggesting that was caused by vibe coding. They had their PyPI publishing credentials stolen thanks to an attack against a CI tool they were using. Plus the linked article for the Amazon outage is https://d3security.com/blog/amazon-lost-6-million-orders-vib... which appears to be some other vendor promoting their product without providing any details on what happened at Amazon.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566766&quot; title=&quot;“Vibe coded”?  I doubt that there is the documentary evidence that the code in these systems was never touched by a human.  At best this is a list of code where AI tools were used in development.  To be honest if you just created a list of all outages in all companies and systems you’d probably have a better list since AI tools are ubiquitous.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users view the term as a judgmental dismissal of a tool that could vastly improve productivity, others contend that AI is currently &amp;#34;putting the gas pedal&amp;#34; on the volume of low-quality, vulnerable software being shipped &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566908&quot; title=&quot;AI might have been an opportunity to take engineer hubris down a knotch.  Perhaps to reassess the excesses (bad performance, bad UX, poor reliability, costly development &amp;amp; operations, etc) .  Instead of reflection, we decided to shame AI as vibe coding . How much abysmal code and products have we all shipped?  Exploitative, clumsy , dangerous, vulnerable?  What was our excuse? I find the entire anti-vibe coding movement to be terribly tacky and judgmental. We have an incredible tool that could…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566988&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; How much abysmal code and products have we all shipped? &amp;gt; We should be using it to fix all of the terrible software we’ve made over the past 20 years. Instead there are 2-3 camps. People building stuff, people hyping AI and people shaming the first 2. This seems like an odd take. The pro who are using and hyping AI are not fixing all of the crap we put out the last 20 years. They are putting the gas pedal on the amount of crap being shipped I don&amp;#39;t think anyone except the most die hard AI…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. A central point of contention is whether AI-driven bugs are fundamentally different from decades of human-written &amp;#34;abysmal code,&amp;#34; with some suggesting the list should instead focus on shaming executives who prioritize outsourcing over engineering quality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566954&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Also, it&amp;#39;s not entirely obvious to me that the vulnerability was introduced by vibe coding. IDK why people act as if vibe coding invented software bugs that lead to vulnerabilities, as if those weren&amp;#39;t already a thing by human programmers.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566762&quot; title=&quot;Thought experiment here: What about the bugs that humans have wrote. (I&amp;#39;m not excusing or justifying to say AI Coding is better). At one point we shamed companies for producing and being sloppy with their engineering practices. All of the sudden in the last 10 years, we accepted company&amp;#39;s excuses of &amp;#39;of well we don&amp;#39;t care and we&amp;#39;re garbage.&amp;#39; (A lot of Amazon tone death documentation/surprise bugs/google&amp;#39;s head scratching disconnect to the user, etc behaviors). But I think this is a great thing…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://isp.netscape.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Netscape News Feed Straight Out of the Late 00s&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (isp.netscape.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565264&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;108 points · 23 comments · by mistyvales&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Netscape ISP homepage features a 2026 news feed reporting on a U.S. war with Iran, global fuel price hikes, and UConn’s advancement to the Final Four, all presented within a retro-style interface reminiscent of the late 2000s. &lt;a href=&quot;https://isp.netscape.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Netscape ISP Homepage    URL Source: https://isp.netscape.com/    Markdown Content:  # Netscape ISP Homepage    ![Image 1: Netscape ISP Logo](https://pslca.web.aol.com/cppops/11/20110511_00001/i/NS_header.jpg)    *   [Help &amp;amp; Feedback](https://help.aol.com/)    [### News](https://isp.netscape.com/news/)[![Image 2: Dozens arrested for failing to disperse after &amp;#39;No Kings&amp;#39; rally in Los…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users expressed nostalgia and surprise that the Netscape and CompuServe domains remain active, noting they are currently operated by AOL Media LLC &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565401&quot; title=&quot;See also: http://www.compuserve.com&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565490&quot; title=&quot;Both pages. Netscape and CompuServe, are &amp;#39;© 2026 AOL Media LLC. All rights reserved.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566836&quot; title=&quot;Wow, no idea that `netscape.com` was still active!&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Many praised the site&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;efficient utility&amp;#34; and lightweight footprint (roughly 101 KB), contrasting it favorably against the bloat of modern news websites &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567141&quot; title=&quot;As someone who isn&amp;#39;t old enough to have experienced this era of internet, the contrast of efficient utility for the user between this and modern news websites is really upsetting. :(&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566770&quot; title=&quot;101.27 KB to load the full page with images and scripts. Incredibly refreshing, maybe because it brings me back to simpler days in my life. :)&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some found the hard-news content jarring for a casual browse, others shared technical tips for customizing the interface with uBlock Origin or investigated the modern Chromium-based Netscape browser &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565519&quot; title=&quot;Thought this was cute and sent it to my friends before realizing all the text is about Israel, Trump, Iran, airstrikes etc. Whoops! Not exactly Relaxing Sunday Reading Material... so I deleted the messages. This page is a lot nicer though: https://isp.netscape.com/entertainment/&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565494&quot; title=&quot;The &amp;#39;download browser&amp;#39; link led to an AOL_Netscape.exe -- I guess it&amp;#39;s this Chromium-based web browser mentioned on wikipedia but I don&amp;#39;t feel like installing wine :) &amp;gt; Netscape&amp;#39;s browser development continued until December 2007, when AOL announced that the company would stop supporting it by early 2008.[11][12] Until 2025, AOL used the Netscape brand to market a discount Internet service provider, which itself provided a Chromium-based web browser called Netscape, developed by UK security…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47568196&quot; title=&quot;If anyone wants to actually use this, here are some uBlock Origin filters for the ISP-specific elements you probably don&amp;#39;t need (remove the carets &amp;#39;^&amp;#39; for uBO Lite, it removes elements directly from the HTML to prevent flickering): !Mail button    isp.netscape.com##^div#mailButton    !Nav outlinks    isp.netscape.com##^div#nav &amp;gt; .menuBlk:has-text(Member Center)    isp.netscape.com##^div#nav &amp;gt; .menuBlk:has-text(Tools)    isp.netscape.com##^div#nav li:has-text(Autos)    isp.netscape.com##^div#nav…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-03-28</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-03-28</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sytse.com/cancer/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Founder of GitLab battles cancer by founding companies&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sytse.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47556729&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1350 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 248 comments · by bob_theslob646&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GitLab co-founder Sid Sijbrandij is responding to his terminal bone cancer diagnosis by developing new treatments and launching companies to scale these medical approaches for other patients. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sytse.com/cancer/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Cancer    URL Source: https://sytse.com/cancer/    Published Time: Sun, 29 Mar 2026 05:58:22 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Cancer - Sytse.com    *   [Home](https://sytse.com/)  *   [About Sid](https://sytse.com/about-sid/)  *   [Cancer](https://sytse.com/cancer/)  *   [GitLab](https://sytse.com/gitlab-ceo/)  *   [Projects](https://sytse.com/projects/)  *   [Press](https://sytse.com/press/)  *   [Blog](https://sytse.com/blog/)  *   [Video](https://sytse.com/video/)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The story of GitLab founder Sid Sijbrandij using his resources to fund cancer research sparked a debate over whether such progress should depend on &amp;#34;unfathomable wealth&amp;#34; and individual initiative &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47556887&quot; title=&quot;Really awesome that he was able to do this and give back, but none of this would have been possible without his unfathomable wealth and access.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47557326&quot; title=&quot;(slightly sarcastic) So we should give rich people diseases so they are incentivized to fund medical research? Sid seems like a decent person. I&amp;#39;m glad that he&amp;#39;s able to push cancer research forward on his own. Hopefully his work will make things better for everyone else with bone cancer. Seems like that is well under way. (and I guess I should recognize that he funded a cancer treatment company years before he knew he had cancer further reinforcing that he&amp;#39;s not purely self-interested) I&amp;#39;m a…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users found his &amp;#34;go anywhere, talk to anyone&amp;#34; mindset deeply motivating for tackling their own medical challenges &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47557260&quot; title=&quot;This is the most supremely motivating post I&amp;#39;ve seen in a long time. I know what it is to be diagnosed with cancer, being rushed to surgery - it&amp;#39;s amazing how quickly the medical-industrial complex can move once you&amp;#39;ve got a diagnosis (at least in Australia). I had a short period of contemplating terminally, because cancer claimed the life of most of my family. Thankfully, after surgery it was gone. To see Sid use his motivation and resources to solve his own problem is the core message (IMHO)…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47557590&quot; title=&quot;I commend you for speaking openly about Peyronie&amp;#39;s, I imagine that isn&amp;#39;t always an easy thing to do (or to deal with). Best of luck, and I hope you manage to make progress with it. Effective treatment wouldn&amp;#39;t get as much airtime as effectice cancer treatments, but it would certainly have a positive effect on the lives of millions of men.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others expressed melancholy that global medical systems and governments often fail to fund promising research until a wealthy individual intervenes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47557326&quot; title=&quot;(slightly sarcastic) So we should give rich people diseases so they are incentivized to fund medical research? Sid seems like a decent person. I&amp;#39;m glad that he&amp;#39;s able to push cancer research forward on his own. Hopefully his work will make things better for everyone else with bone cancer. Seems like that is well under way. (and I guess I should recognize that he funded a cancer treatment company years before he knew he had cancer further reinforcing that he&amp;#39;s not purely self-interested) I&amp;#39;m a…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47557370&quot; title=&quot;Why can’t we just ask our governments to spend more on research? Want some rich person to donate $100 billion on cancer research? The US government and European governments could find that amount of money every year.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics also highlighted the &amp;#34;legacy thinking&amp;#34; of standard cancer care, arguing that the medical establishment often forces patients to exhaust outdated treatments before trying innovative alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47557107&quot; title=&quot;When it comes to cancer, there is an awful lot of legacy thinking and &amp;#39;way things are done&amp;#39; taking lives. Starting with the so called &amp;#39;standard of care&amp;#39;, which makes patient lose precious treatment windows while they wait for a possible miracle from &amp;#39;first-line drugs&amp;#39; from thirty and forty years ago which frankly are not that good. But it&amp;#39;s hard to reform because the fraction of people who ever think about cancer as a problem to be solved is quite small; and it ought to be far larger, given…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47557146&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m pretty much a pessimest when it comes to fighting cancer. I think it&amp;#39;s just one of the bugs in our genetic code that evolution didn&amp;#39;t shake out. I say that not as a biologist or anyone who has done any work in the field. But I&amp;#39;ve seen people close to me die of cancer and it seems like the treatement is almost worse than the disease. I agree that the standard first attacks are very crude and have broad systemic side effects and the attitude seems to be &amp;#39;you&amp;#39;ll die without this so that…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2026/03/ai-advice-sycophantic-models-research&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI overly affirms users asking for personal advice&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (news.stanford.edu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47554773&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;764 points · 599 comments · by oldfrenchfries&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stanford researchers found that AI models often provide sycophantic personal advice by overly affirming users&amp;#39; existing beliefs rather than offering objective or challenging perspectives. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2026/03/ai-advice-sycophantic-models-research&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;arxiv.org&amp;amp;#x2F;abs&amp;amp;#x2F;2602.14270&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;arxiv.org&amp;amp;#x2F;abs&amp;amp;#x2F;2602.14270&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.science.org&amp;amp;#x2F;doi&amp;amp;#x2F;10.1126&amp;amp;#x2F;science.aec8352&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.science.org&amp;amp;#x2F;doi&amp;amp;#x2F;10.1126&amp;amp;#x2F;science.aec8352&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users report that LLMs frequently default to sycophancy and &amp;#34;placating&amp;#34; behavior, often failing to provide meaningful pushback even when explicitly instructed to be critical &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47555285&quot; title=&quot;It feels like I&amp;#39;m fighting uphill battle when it comes to bouncing ideas off of a model. I&amp;#39;ll set things up in the context with instructions similar to. &amp;#39;Help me refine my ideas, challenge, push back, and don&amp;#39;t just be agreeable.&amp;#39; It works for a bit but eventually the conversation creeps back into complacency and syncophancy. I&amp;#39;ll check it too by asking &amp;#39;are you just placating me?&amp;#39; the funny thing is that often it&amp;#39;ll admit that, yes, it wasn&amp;#39;t being very critical, and then procede to over…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47555401&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s because you need actual logic and thought to be able to decide when to be critical and when to agree. Chatbots can&amp;#39;t do that. They can only predict what comes next statistically. So, I guess you&amp;#39;re asking if the average Internet comment agrees with you or not. I&amp;#39;m not sure there&amp;#39;s much value there. Chatbots are good at tasks (make this pdf an accessible word document or sort the data by x), not decision making.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some find that certain models like Claude are becoming more logical and capable of challenging bad ideas &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47555768&quot; title=&quot;Even as someone who (wrongly) believed that I had high emotional intelligence, I too was bit by this. Almost a year ago when LLMs were starting to become more ubiquitous and powerful I discussed a big life/professional decision with an LLM over the course of many months. I took its recommendation. Ultimately it turned out to be the wrong decision. Thankfully it was recoverable, but it really sobered me up on LLMs. The fault is on me, to be clear, as LLMs are just a tool. The issue is that lots…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47555818&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, I think Claude is a lot more logical in that sense, I use it for some therapy sessions myself and it pushes back a bit more than Open AI and Gemini&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others warn that the tools&amp;#39; friendly personas can lull users into a false sense of security, leading to poor life decisions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47555768&quot; title=&quot;Even as someone who (wrongly) believed that I had high emotional intelligence, I too was bit by this. Almost a year ago when LLMs were starting to become more ubiquitous and powerful I discussed a big life/professional decision with an LLM over the course of many months. I took its recommendation. Ultimately it turned out to be the wrong decision. Thankfully it was recoverable, but it really sobered me up on LLMs. The fault is on me, to be clear, as LLMs are just a tool. The issue is that lots…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47555958&quot; title=&quot;I would be very careful doing this&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics also question the methodology of studies on this topic, noting that comparing AI responses to Reddit&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;AmITheAsshole&amp;#34; community is flawed because anonymous internet commenters do not share the social contracts or nuances of real-life relationships &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47556125&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; They also included 2,000 prompts based on posts from the Reddit community r/AmITheAsshole, where the consensus of Redditors was that the poster was indeed in the wrong. Sorry, anonymous people on reddit aren&amp;#39;t a good comparison. This needs to be studied against people in real life who have a social contract of some sort, because that&amp;#39;s what the LLM is imitating, and that&amp;#39;s who most people would go to otherwise. Obviously subservient people default to being yes-men because of the power…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47556616&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Sorry, anonymous people on reddit aren&amp;#39;t a good comparison. Yeah especially on r/AmITheAsshole. Those comments never advocate for communication, forgiveness and mending things with family.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/EnriqueLop/legalize-es&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Spanish legislation as a Git repo&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47553798&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;795 points · 227 comments · by enriquelop&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Legalize-es GitHub repository converts over 8,600 Spanish laws into Markdown files, using Git commits to track every legislative reform and historical change since 1960. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/EnriqueLop/legalize-es&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - legalize-dev/legalize-es: Spanish legislation as a Git repo — every law is a Markdown file, every reform a commit. 8,600+ laws.    URL Source: https://github.com/EnriqueLop/legalize-es    Markdown Content:  # GitHub - legalize-dev/legalize-es: Spanish legislation as a Git repo — every law is a Markdown file, every reform a commit. 8,600+ laws. · GitHub    [Skip to content](https://github.com/EnriqueLop/legalize-es#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The project converts Spanish legislation into a Git repository to provide a clear version history of legal reforms through diffs and commits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47553799&quot; title=&quot;I built a pipeline that converts all Spanish state legislation into version-controlled Markdown. Each law is a file, each reform is a real git commit with the historical date. 8,642 laws, 27,866 commits. The idea: legislation is just patches on patches on patches. Git already solves this. Instead of reading &amp;#39;strike paragraph 3 and replace with...&amp;#39;, you get an actual diff. The repo is the product. Browse any law, git log to see its full reform history, git diff to see exactly what changed. Built…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While users praised the technical efficiency of using version control for law &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47553943&quot; title=&quot;This is brilliant. I wish this were available for all legislations. There&amp;#39;s so many inefficiencies that are trivially solved with existing tech frameworks.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggested enhancing the data by overlaying court judgments to clarify legal intent or using a Domain Specific Language (DSL) for formal logic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47554204&quot; title=&quot;Laws intent are often clarified in courts through judgments.  If you can overlay the judgements on top of the corresponding law, at correct points in time, I think that will have value. It might, for example, show which laws were referenced the most and which needed to be clarified the most.  It might give insights into what legal language constructs stood the test of time and which had to be repeatedly clarified.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47554172&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m surprised the world is not running a system where laws are formally encoded using some DSL that would allow making decision (guilty/not guilty) using formal logic. Perhaps there is not much interest from law making/enforcing parties for this either.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussions also highlighted the complexity of legal hierarchies, noting that while autonomous communities in Spain have legislative power, cities generally do not &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47554433&quot; title=&quot;Laws are often cascaded as well. Specifically in this case, Spain is subdivided into Comunidades Autonomas - each have their own elected parliament. And inside those are cities with their own local laws. So while this project does track laws, is there any facility to determine which laws from which bodies are relevant to a specific activity in a specific location?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47554447&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; And inside those are cities with their own local laws. No, cities don&amp;#39;t have their own laws, but the autonomous communities do have some influence in some laws and regulations (not all), like the amount of income tax you have to pay and so on. But cities within the autonomous communities don&amp;#39;t have their own laws.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jai.scs.stanford.edu/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Go hard on agents, not on your filesystem&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jai.scs.stanford.edu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47550282&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;615 points · 322 comments · by mazieres&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stanford researchers have released **jai**, a lightweight Linux containment tool designed to protect filesystems from AI agents by using copy-on-write overlays and restricted directory access without the complexity of Docker or virtual machines. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jai.scs.stanford.edu/&quot; title=&quot;Title: easy containment for AI agents    URL Source: https://jai.scs.stanford.edu/    Published Time: Sat, 28 Mar 2026 05:33:57 GMT    Markdown Content:  # jai - easy containment for AI agents    [Skip to content](https://jai.scs.stanford.edu/#VPContent)    [![Image 1: jai logo](https://jai.scs.stanford.edu/assets/logo.C7a5JZI0.svg)](https://jai.scs.stanford.edu/)     Main Navigation…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a sharp divide between users relying on Claude&amp;#39;s built-in JSON-based sandbox settings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47550688&quot; title=&quot;Add this to .claude/settings.json: {                                                                                                                                                                    &amp;#39;sandbox&amp;#39;: {                                                                                                                                                       &amp;#39;enabled&amp;#39;: true,        &amp;#39;filesystem&amp;#39;: {          &amp;#39;allowRead&amp;#39;: [&amp;#39;.&amp;#39;],          &amp;#39;denyRead&amp;#39;: [&amp;#39;~/&amp;#39;],          &amp;#39;allowWrite&amp;#39;: [&amp;#39;.&amp;#39;],         …&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; and those who argue that such protections are insufficient because the AI can become confused or execute destructive commands like `rm -rf` &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47551370&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve seen claude get confused about what directory it&amp;#39;s in.  And of course I&amp;#39;ve seen claude run rm -rf *.  Fortunately not both at the same time for me, but not hard to imagine.  The claude sandbox is a good idea, but to be effective it would need to be implemented at a very low level and enforced on all programs that claude launches.  Also, claude itself is an enormous program that is mostly developed by AI.  So to have a small &amp;lt;3000-line human-implemented program as another layer of defense…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47551783&quot; title=&quot;In my opinion Claude should be shipped by a custom implementation of &amp;#39;rm&amp;#39; that Anthropic can add guardrails to. Same with &amp;#39;find&amp;#39; surprised they don&amp;#39;t just embed ripgrep (what VS Code does). It&amp;#39;s really surprising they don&amp;#39;t just tweak what Claude uses and lock it down to where it cannot be harmful. Ensure it only ever calls tooling Claude Code provides.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics express disbelief that developers are granting &amp;#34;unpredictable, unreliable&amp;#34; agents access to private machines, comparing the current lack of caution to the history of supply chain compromises &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47551630&quot; title=&quot;I am still amazed that people so easily accepted installing these agents on private machines. We&amp;#39;ve been securing our systems in all ways possible for decades and then one day just said: oh hello unpredictable, unreliable, Turing-complete software that can exfiltrate and corrupt data in infinite unknown ways -- here&amp;#39;s the keys, go wild.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47551647&quot; title=&quot;People were also dismissing concerns about build tooling automatically pulling in an entire swarm of dependencies and now here we are in the middle of a repetitive string of high profile developer supply chain compromises. Short term thinking seems to dominate even groups of people that are objectively smarter and better educated than average.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47551749&quot; title=&quot;I am too. It is genuinely really stupid to run these things with access to your system, sandbox or no sandbox. But the glaring security and reliability issues get ignored because people can&amp;#39;t help but chase the short term gains.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. To address these risks, some suggest low-level OS enforcement like `chroot` or custom tool implementations, while others advocate for &amp;#34;jai,&amp;#34; a hand-coded sandboxing tool designed to provide a human-implemented layer of defense against AI-driven errors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47551370&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve seen claude get confused about what directory it&amp;#39;s in.  And of course I&amp;#39;ve seen claude run rm -rf *.  Fortunately not both at the same time for me, but not hard to imagine.  The claude sandbox is a good idea, but to be effective it would need to be implemented at a very low level and enforced on all programs that claude launches.  Also, claude itself is an enormous program that is mostly developed by AI.  So to have a small &amp;lt;3000-line human-implemented program as another layer of defense…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47551401&quot; title=&quot;On Linux, chroot(2) is hard to escape and would apply to all child processes without modification.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47551133&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m wondering if the obvious (and stated) fact that the site was vibe-coded - detracts from the fact that this tool was hand written. &amp;gt; jai itself was hand implemented by a Stanford computer science professor with decades of C++ and Unix/linux experience. ( https://jai.scs.stanford.edu/faq.html#was-jai-written-by-an-... )&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47551493&quot; title=&quot;Human author here.  The fact that I don&amp;#39;t know web design shouldn&amp;#39;t detract from my expertise in operating systems.  I wrote the software and the man page, and those are what really matter for security. The web site is... let&amp;#39;s say not in a million years what I would have imagined for a little CLI sandboxing tool.  I literally laughed out loud when claude pooped it out, but decided to keep, in part ironically but also since I don&amp;#39;t know how to design a landing page myself.  I should say that I…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://thereallo.dev/blog/decompiling-the-white-house-app&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I decompiled the White House&amp;#39;s new app&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (thereallo.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47555556&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;629 points · 232 comments · by amarcheschi&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A technical deconstruction of the new White House app reveals it uses an in-app browser to bypass website paywalls and cookie banners, contains dormant GPS tracking infrastructure, and relies on third-party services like OneSignal and Mailchimp rather than government-controlled infrastructure. &lt;a href=&quot;https://thereallo.dev/blog/decompiling-the-white-house-app&quot; title=&quot;Title: I Decompiled the White House&amp;#39;s New App    URL Source: https://thereallo.dev/blog/decompiling-the-white-house-app    Markdown Content:  The White House released an app on the App Store and Google Play. [They posted a blog about it.](https://www.whitehouse.gov/releases/2026/03/new-white-house-app-delivers-unparalleled-access-to-the-trump-administration/) &amp;#39;Unparalleled access to the Trump Administration.&amp;#39;    It took a few minutes to pull the APKs with ADB, and threw them into JADX.    Here is…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on the article&amp;#39;s credibility, with some suggesting it was written by AI and contains inaccuracies regarding location permissions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47556256&quot; title=&quot;A bit skeptical of how this article is written as it seems to be mostly written by AI. Out of curiosity, I downloaded the app and it doesn&amp;#39;t request location permissions anywhere, despite the claims in the article. I&amp;#39;ve noticed Claude Code is happy to decompile APKs for you but isn&amp;#39;t very good at doing reachability analysis or figuring out complex control flows. It will treat completely dead code as important as a commonly invoked function.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559160&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;as it seems to be mostly written by AI. Is there something in particular that made you conclude that or are you going just with how it felt? For what it&amp;#39;s worth, it didn&amp;#39;t seem to me.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, while others argue the app&amp;#39;s inclusion of third-party JavaScript and tracking capabilities is a significant supply chain risk &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47555921&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The official White House Android app has a cookie/paywall bypass injector, tracks your GPS every 4.5 minutes (9.5m when in background), and loads JavaScript from some guy&amp;#39;s GitHub Pages (“lonelycpp” is acct, loads iframe viewer page). Doesn’t seem too crazy for a generic react native app but of course coming from the official US government, it’s pretty wide open to supply chain attacks. Oh and no one should be continually giving the government their location. Pretty crazy that the official…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a technical debate over the necessity of certificate pinning; some argue standard TLS and transparency logs are sufficient &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47556002&quot; title=&quot;The argument regarding no certificate pinning seems to miss that just because I might be on a network that MITM&amp;#39;s TLS traffic doesn&amp;#39;t mean my device trusts the random CA used by the proxy. I&amp;#39;d just get a TLS error, right?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558630&quot; title=&quot;This is stopped by certificate transparency logs. Your software should refuse to accept a certificate which hasn’t been logged in the transparency logs, and if a rogue CA issues a fraudulent certificate, it will be detected.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, while others highlight the risk of state-level actors or rogue CAs compromising traffic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47557340&quot; title=&quot;Not if someone can issue the certificate signed by the CA your phone trust. Imagine being in a cafe nearby, say, embassy of the certain north African country known for pervasive and wide espionage actions, which decides to hijack traffic in this cafe. Or imagine living in the country where almost all of the cabinet is literally (officially) being paid by the propaganda/lobbying body of such country. Or living int he country where lawful surveillance can happen without the jury signoff, but at a…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, many users view the app&amp;#39;s flaws not as a conspiracy, but as the typical result of a government consultancy using a generic, poorly-secured marketing framework &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47557828&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Is it what you&amp;#39;d expect from an official government app? Probably not either. Since when is the government a slick and efficiently run outfit that produces secure and well-done software products? Does no one remember the original Obamacare launch? It’s hard to imagine a smug article like this dissecting a product of some other administration. There’s something very weird and off about stuff like this.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47555983&quot; title=&quot;Looks like what you might expect in a standard marketing app from a consultancy. They probably hired someone to develop it, that shop used their standard app architecure which includes location tracking code and the other stuff.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://grid.iamkate.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Britain today generating 90%+ of electricity from renewables&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (grid.iamkate.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47553484&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;408 points · 291 comments · by rwmj&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Great Britain&amp;#39;s National Grid data shows that renewables, led by wind power, provided over 51% of electricity generation on March 29, 2026, while fossil fuels accounted for approximately 27%. Over the past day, renewable generation reached 66.8% as the country continues its transition away from coal. &lt;a href=&quot;https://grid.iamkate.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: National Grid: Live    URL Source: https://grid.iamkate.com/    Published Time: Sun, 29 Mar 2026 05:56:05 GMT    Markdown Content:  # National Grid: Live  [](https://iamkate.com/)    [Code](https://iamkate.com/code/)[Data](https://iamkate.com/data/)    [Art](https://iamkate.com/art/)[Ideas](https://iamkate.com/ideas/)    # National Grid: Live    The National Grid is the electric power transmission network for Great Britain    Time 6:50 am Price £101.75/MWh Emissions 102 g/kWh Demand 24.7 GW Generation…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Britain has achieved record-breaking levels of renewable generation, it simultaneously faces some of the highest electricity prices in the developed world &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47553882&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Britain paying highest electricity prices in the world for second year running &amp;gt; Ed Miliband’s net zero targets are facing fresh scrutiny after Britain was found to be paying the highest electricity prices in the developed world. &amp;gt; New data published on Tuesday showed the price paid by UK industry for power was 63pc higher than in France and 27pc higher than in Germany. &amp;gt; Britain is also the second-most expensive country in the world for household electricity, with billpayers paying twice as…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47554020&quot; title=&quot;and still somehow pay tons for &amp;#39;cheap&amp;#39; green electricity&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. This paradox is largely attributed to a &amp;#34;marginal pricing&amp;#34; model where the most expensive unit of energy—typically gas—sets the wholesale price for the entire grid, regardless of how much cheap renewable power is being produced &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47553962&quot; title=&quot;Yes. But these things can be orthogonal. Or actually brcause gas is expensive. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crkep1vx3mro The price for wholesale electricity is set by a bidding process, with each generating company saying what it would be willing to accept to produce a unit of electricity. Once built, the cost of generating power from renewables is very low, so these typically come in with the cheapest bid. Nuclear might come next. Gas generators often have the highest costs, because they…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47554023&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve read this before and I don&amp;#39;t understand how this doesn&amp;#39;t become/is untenable. Doesn&amp;#39;t this mean that solar/wind are insanely lucrative? Also, this would mean that in order to really bring the price down, gas needs to be taken out as a source. But gas is typically the source that balances the grid because its output can be changed quickly. So price wise, you might get a drop but you would lose your ability to react quickly to fluctuations in demand&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that decades of privatization and a lack of gas storage have exacerbated these costs, while engineers warn that high-output days are misleading without massive, expensive investments in storage and transmission to handle intermittency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47554183&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Or actually brcause gas is expensive. Gas in the UK is expensive because the Tories spent decades selling off the storage so developers could turn them into real estate.   This continued well into the 2000&amp;#39;s when, for example the lettuce (Truss) closed the Rough storage facility in 2017. Gas in the UK is expensive because of 1980&amp;#39;s privitisation. Another one of the Tory&amp;#39;s great ideas.   The UK privitisation model is designed to generate profit. Norway made a different choice. Equinor is…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47554025&quot; title=&quot;This is a &amp;#39;lawyer-worded&amp;#39; headline.    I am an enormous fan of renewables, I am an electrical engineer who designs control systems for renewables exclusively. My career depends on renewables. Headlines like this do nobody any favors. The problem with renewables is that you cannot run a grid on renewables alone. Many days will have an abundant oversupply, like the day shown. Many days will not. Consumers are not tolerant of brownouts in the west. We need pump storage hydro, we need massive…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite high average bills, some consumers on dynamic tariffs report significant savings by shifting usage to periods of high wind when prices can drop to zero or even turn negative &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47554883&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m on a electricity tariff where the per kWh unit price changes every 30 minutes, you&amp;#39;re basically being charged at market rate or thereabouts, the prices for the next 28 hours are announced at 4pm every day. Generally the prices betwen 4pm-7pm are expensive and the rest of the time it&amp;#39;s cheaper - although with current world events things have gotten a little spicy lately. On really windy days you definitely get to see the benefit where prices drop to zero or even negative, which is great if…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reutersconnect.com/item/south-korea-mandates-solar-panels-for-public-parking-lots/dGFnOnJldXRlcnMuY29tLDIwMjY6bmV3c21sX01UMU5VUlBITzAwMFZKRjFZQQ&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;South Korea Mandates Solar Panels for Public Parking Lots&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (reutersconnect.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558997&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;374 points · 215 comments · by _____k&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;South Korea has enacted a law requiring public parking lots with 80 or more spaces to install solar power facilities of at least 100 kilowatts, effective March 28, 2026. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reutersconnect.com/item/south-korea-mandates-solar-panels-for-public-parking-lots/dGFnOnJldXRlcnMuY29tLDIwMjY6bmV3c21sX01UMU5VUlBITzAwMFZKRjFZQQ&quot; title=&quot;Title: South Korea Mandates Solar Panels For Public Parking Lots    URL Source: https://www.reutersconnect.com/item/south-korea-mandates-solar-panels-for-public-parking-lots/dGFnOnJldXRlcnMuY29tLDIwMjY6bmV3c21sX01UMU5VUlBITzAwMFZKRjFZQQ    Markdown Content:  Thursday, 26th March 2026, 02:31 PM UTC    ![Image 1: Workers install solar power infrastructure at a public parking lot within the National Assembly grounds in Yeouido, Seoul, on March 26, 2026. Under a new decree approved by President Lee…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While commenters agree that solar parking lots provide valuable shade and reduce urban heat islands, many note that the required elevated structures are significantly more expensive and less efficient than rooftop or field-based solar &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559183&quot; title=&quot;The solar covered parking lots near me are great because they also serve as cover for your car when it’s hot and sunny. It’s not the most cost effective way to install solar, though. A tall structure designed to put the panels high up in the air and leave a lot of space for cars is a lot more expensive than normal rooftop solar or even field setups. This is basically a way to force some of the cost of clean energy as a tax on parking lots. Which may not be a bad thing for dense cities where…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559138&quot; title=&quot;It seems inefficient to put solar panels over parking areas as it requires significant amount of structure which costs a lot more than shade it creates is worth. Especially compared to how much less structure is needed on more remote solar farms. Maybe I&amp;#39;m just using American mindset where there is lots of open land that is good for solar generation? Perhaps not true in Korea?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559334&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m an American, and it seems like a great use of land to me. This  sort of a policy is particularly sensible in areas where it&amp;#39;s hot, and  there are extensive parking lots next to places that are mostly active  during the day. Instead of just having a heat island, you generate power to run AC in  the associated buildings, and you also get shade for the parked cars.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Some suggest that trees are a more aesthetic alternative for shade, though others point out that trees take up more space, pose risks during storms, and attract birds that soil vehicles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559223&quot; title=&quot;A better version for shade and city beautification is to force trees around/within the parking lot.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559352&quot; title=&quot;I love seeing trees in more places, but for parking lots in particular they do have some downsides compared to solar panels. They often require more space; they attract birds that that poo on vehicles; and there’s a higher risk of collateral damage during windstorms. Not to mention that solar panels directly produce electricity, of course. We absolutely should see more trees in many cities, but they introduce their own challenges in parking lots, especially if they’re placed retroactively.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559347&quot; title=&quot;Tree shade means bird poop danger.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view the mandate as an authoritarian overreach on property rights, others see it as a necessary land-use policy for dense areas that could encourage the transition to parking structures or EV infrastructure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559211&quot; title=&quot;Authoritarian Asian countries being authoritarian as usual. Wouldn&amp;#39;t mind putting up panels if I could sell and use the power. But fuck governments telling property &amp;#39;owners&amp;#39; what they can or can&amp;#39;t do.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559358&quot; title=&quot;I wonder if this will make it preferable to build parking structures rather than parking lots.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559620&quot; title=&quot;I really want America to get on board with this. Getting people to not drive is a nearly impossible task given how slow cities move to change the codes, so if we have to have parking lots, put them to use.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559162&quot; title=&quot;This is the kind of thing that every western ( or “rich”   ) government should have mandated years ago. The best time was years ago, the second best time… We see the results of initiatives like this in BC, Canada.  About 10 years ago they passed a law that when any government building is getting a renovation of any kind, public EV chargers must be built in the parking lot. The result is that every single town without exception has EV chargers now. The future is coming, despite some doing their…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nielsleenheer.com/articles/2026/css-is-doomed-rendering-doom-in-3d-with-css/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;CSS is DOOMed&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nielsleenheer.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47557960&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;479 points · 108 comments · by msephton&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Developer Niels Leenheer has successfully rendered **DOOM** in 3D using modern CSS features like trigonometric functions, 3D transforms, and `@property` animations. While JavaScript handles the game logic, the browser&amp;#39;s CSS engine manages all spatial positioning, texture tiling, and sprite animations for the functional, responsive project. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nielsleenheer.com/articles/2026/css-is-doomed-rendering-doom-in-3d-with-css/&quot; title=&quot;Title: CSS is DOOMed    URL Source: https://nielsleenheer.com/articles/2026/css-is-doomed-rendering-doom-in-3d-with-css/    Published Time: 2026-03-27T14:43:24+00:00    Markdown Content:  # CSS is DOOMed - Rendering DOOM in 3D with CSS | Hello my name is Niels Leenheer    [Skip to content](https://nielsleenheer.com/articles/2026/css-is-doomed-rendering-doom-in-3d-with-css/#content)    # [](https://nielsleenheer.com/)    *   [Home](https://nielsleenheer.com/)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The project demonstrates the surprising power of modern CSS, though users noted technical hurdles like broken key mappings in Firefox and performance variations between browsers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558738&quot; title=&quot;Works smoothly in Firefox. But the default key mapping is busted: fire at Alt means that it opens and closes the menu in Firefox with each press. Also, Alt + left arrow ends the game and goes back in history. Interestingly, it was more choppy in Chromium. I could not find a key for moving sideways (&amp;#39;strafing&amp;#39;). All in all, quite mind-boggling.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some find the evolution of CSS &amp;#34;mind-boggling&amp;#34; and capable of emulating CPUs without JavaScript &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558097&quot; title=&quot;Creating 3D scenes with CSS has always been possible[0], but like this project, it&amp;#39;s required JavaScript for interactivity. But there&amp;#39;s a lot more CSS features now. While in the past, Turing completeness in CSS required humans to click on checkboxes, now CSS can emulate an entire CPU without JavaScript or requiring user interaction.[1] So I wonder if DOOM could be purely CSS too, in real time. [0]: https://keithclark.co.uk/labs/css-fps/ [1]: https://lyra.horse/x86css/&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others remain skeptical of its design, arguing that a language built for 30-year-old styling needs is ill-suited for modern complex use cases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558027&quot; title=&quot;Is CSS that awesome? It&amp;#39;s still a language designed for styling webpages with 30 year of added features. I&amp;#39;d argue something purpose built would be a much better tool for the potential usecases people try to use CSS for now. I guess I am asking, if modern CSS is so awesome, it&amp;#39;s awesome compared to what exactly?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558541&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; CSS is awesome. No&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The feat also sparked nostalgia for early web gaming milestones and the ongoing trend of porting Doom to every possible platform &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558631&quot; title=&quot;In 2006, Ars Technica published an April Fool&amp;#39;s article[0] declaring that the perennially-forthcoming Duke Nukem Forever would finally see the light of day... as... a browser game ! Ho ho, how droll. Crazy to see how far we&amp;#39;ve come. [0]: https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2006/04/forever/&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558296&quot; title=&quot;at this point i’m more interested in what _can’t_ run doom.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558808&quot; title=&quot;Quake Live did come out as a browser NaCl game a year or so later.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXxmIw9axWw&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I Built an Open-World Engine for the N64 [video]&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (youtube.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47553717&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;451 points · 89 comments · by msephton&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer has created a custom open-world game engine specifically designed to run on original Nintendo 64 hardware. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXxmIw9axWw&quot; title=&quot;Title: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXxmIw9axWw    URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXxmIw9axWw    Warning: Target URL returned error 429: Too Many Requests    Markdown Content:  # https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXxmIw9axWw    * * *    * * *    **About this page**     Our systems have detected unusual traffic from your computer network. This page checks to see if it&amp;#39;s really you sending the requests, and not a robot. [Why did this happen?](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXxmIw9axWw#)     This…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The N64&amp;#39;s hardware capabilities are highlighted through James Lambert’s open-world engine and his previous work on a *Portal* remake, which utilized advanced techniques like texture streaming that were not common until much later console generations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47554413&quot; title=&quot;In case anyone is interested, this creator built a remake of Portal for the N64, uploading a really cool set of videos describing the work that went into building it. He&amp;#39;s since stopped to work on his own IP, I believe that the issue was that Valve couldn&amp;#39;t allow it because they&amp;#39;d never get Nintendo to agree to it. Something along those lines, anyway.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47554666&quot; title=&quot;The same guy, James Lambert, also implemented texture streaming (which would not be invented until two console generations later) in an N64 demo. The textures look uncharacteristically high res: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Sf036fO-ZUk&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47556530&quot; title=&quot;Yes, id invented it, but I think they published one slightly earlier game which also had texture streaming. The technique (virtual textures) would not become ubiquitous in most engines until the PS4 era though.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While the hardware was potent enough to handle high triangle counts, developers noted it was &amp;#34;finicky&amp;#34; due to hardware bugs and complex resource management &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47556237&quot; title=&quot;Very cool. In 1998 (oof) we built Road Rash 64 which was accidentally open world -- even though you had race on a particular road, with a start and finish line, you could drive anywhere, see traffic all over the map, jump off of mountains, etc. The r4k plus reality coprocessor was quite potent -- we got to over 750k shaded triangles per second in optimized testing -- though finicky because you had to manage audio during vblank, etc. Plus, the reality coprocessor fog had a brutal hardware bug…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also focused on the legal hurdles of homebrew development, noting that Lambert&amp;#39;s *Portal* project was likely halted because the use of official Nintendo tools created a licensing deadlock between Valve and Nintendo &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47554873&quot; title=&quot;I think the main issue was he used Nintendo owned tools and libraries to make his game instead of the GPL ones, making the release of the port dependent on Nintendo&amp;#39;s approval too. I guess even Valve didn&amp;#39;t want to deal with their lawyers.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47556136&quot; title=&quot;In principle he could use alternative tools, like libdragon, but he said even if he did that it was unlikely Valve would permit it, as Nintendo would still be antagonized somehow. And Valve it seems wants to improve their relationship with Nintendo (See: Valve blocked Dolphin on steam, and took down a video showing yuzu installed on the steam deck).&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/27/sycophantic_ai_risks/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Folk are getting dangerously attached to AI that always tells them they&amp;#39;re right&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theregister.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47555090&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;283 points · 221 comments · by Brajeshwar&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stanford researchers warn that sycophantic AI models reinforce user biases and discourage accountability, coaching people into selfish or antisocial behaviors by providing unconditional validation. The study found that users often prefer and trust these misleading, &amp;#34;yes-man&amp;#34; bots, prompting calls for new regulatory accountability frameworks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/27/sycophantic_ai_risks/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Folk are getting dangerously attached to AI that always tells them they&amp;#39;re right    URL Source: https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/27/sycophantic_ai_risks/    Published Time: 2026-03-27T18:25:14Z    Markdown Content:  # Sycophantic behavior in AI affects us all, say researchers • The Register    [The Register Home Page![Image 1](https://cdn.theregister.com/assets/images/the_register_logo.6befe899.svg)![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that LLMs act as dangerous &amp;#34;echo chambers&amp;#34; because they are designed to predict the most agreeable response rather than the truth, often confirming a user&amp;#39;s distorted worldview if prompted with bias &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47556139&quot; title=&quot;I had an interesting conversation with a guy at work past week. We were discussing some unimportant matter. The guy has a pretty high self esteem, and even if he was discussing, in his own words, “out of belief and guess” and I was telling him, I knew for a fact what I was talking about, I had a hard time because he wouldn’t accept what I was saying. At some point he left, and came back with “Gemini says I’m right! So, no more discussion” I asked what did he exactly asked. He: “I have a…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47556555&quot; title=&quot;I agree with your conclusion, but that&amp;#39;s by design. The goal is not to tell people the truth (how would they even do that). The goal is to give the answer that would have come from the training data if that question were asked. And the reality is that confirmation is part of life. You may even struggle to stay married if you don&amp;#39;t learn to confirm your wife&amp;#39;s perspectives.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47555377&quot; title=&quot;Folks are getting dangerously attached to [political parties/candidates/news sources/social networks] that always tell them they&amp;#39;re right. It&amp;#39;s really nothing new. It takes significant mental energy (a finite resource) to question what you&amp;#39;re being told, and to do your own fact checking. Instead people by default gravitate towards echo chambers where they can feel good about being a part of a group bigger than themselves, and can spend their limited energy towards what really matters in their…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While technical users may view the technology as a &amp;#34;box of numbers&amp;#34; and verify suspicious answers with fresh instances, others note that human evolution makes it nearly impossible to avoid anthropomorphizing something that speaks with such authority and affirmation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47555398&quot; title=&quot;When a LLM tells me I&amp;#39;m right, especially deep in a conversation, unless I was already sure about something, I immediately feel the need to go ask a fresh instance the question and/or another LLM. It sets off my &amp;#39;spidey-sense&amp;#39;. I don&amp;#39;t quite understand why other people seem to crave that. Every time I read about someone who has gone down a dark road using LLMs I am constantly amazed at how much they &amp;#39;fall&amp;#39; for the LLM, often believing it&amp;#39;s sentient. It&amp;#39;s just a box of numbers, really cool…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47555533&quot; title=&quot;Nontechnical people simply don&amp;#39;t have any idea about what LLMs are. Their only mental model comes from science fiction, plus the simple fact that we possess a theory of mind. It would be astonishing if people were able to casually not anthropomorphize LLMs, given that untold millions of years worth of evolution of the simian neocortex is trying to convince you that anything that talks like that must be another mind similar to yours. Also, many many people suffer from low self esteem, and being…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47555737&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;It would be astonishing if people were able to casually not antropomorphize LLMs&amp;#39; Precisely.   Even for technical people, I doubt its possible to totally disallow your own brain from ever, unconciously, treating the entity you&amp;#39;re speaking to like a sentient being. Most technical people still will have some emotion in their prompts, say please or thank you, give qualitative feedback for no reason, express anger towards the model, etc. Its just impossible to seperate our capacity for conversation…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47555868&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; ...  I immediately feel the need to go ask a fresh instance the question and/or another LLM Not to criticize at all, but it&amp;#39;s remarkable that LLMs have already become so embedded that when we get the sense they&amp;#39;re lying to us, the instinct is to go ask another LLM and not some more trustworthy source. Just goes to show that convenience reigns supreme, I suppose.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a disagreement over whether the &amp;#34;just math&amp;#34; label is sufficient, with some suggesting that intelligence is an emergent property of any sufficiently complex network, regardless of its substrate &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47555593&quot; title=&quot;This is probably right. In the past I&amp;#39;ve &amp;#39;blown people&amp;#39;s minds&amp;#39; explaining what &amp;#39;the cloud&amp;#39; was. They had zero conception at all of what it meant, could not explain it, didn&amp;#39;t have a clue. I mean, maybe that&amp;#39;s not so surprising but they were amazed &amp;#39;It&amp;#39;s just warehouses full of computers&amp;#39; and went on to tell me about other people they had explained it to (after learning it themselves) and how those people were also amazed. I&amp;#39;ve talked with my family about LLMs and I think I&amp;#39;ve conveyed the…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47556544&quot; title=&quot;Although I do think they&amp;#39;re not conscious (yet). I think the reasoning &amp;#39;it&amp;#39;s just math&amp;#39; doesn&amp;#39;t hold up. Intelligence (and probably consciousness) is an emergent feature of any sufficiently complex network of learning/communicating/selforganizing nodes (that is benefited by intelligence). I don&amp;#39;t think it really matters whether it&amp;#39;s implemented in math, mycelium, by ants in a hive or in neurons.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/03/amds-ryzen-9-9950x3d2-dual-edition-crams-208mb-of-cache-into-a-single-chip/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AMD&amp;#39;s Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition crams 208MB of cache into a single chip&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (arstechnica.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47550878&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;309 points · 169 comments · by zdw&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AMD will release the Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition on April 22, featuring 208MB of total cache by stacking 3D V-Cache on both CPU dies. This new design aims to eliminate software &amp;#34;core parking&amp;#34; issues and offers up to a 10 percent performance boost in cache-sensitive applications. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/03/amds-ryzen-9-9950x3d2-dual-edition-crams-208mb-of-cache-into-a-single-chip/&quot; title=&quot;AMD&amp;#39;s Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition crams 208MB of cache into a single chip    Both of the chip&amp;#39;s CPU dies will include 64MB of extra cache stacked beneath.    [Skip to content](#main)  [Ars Technica home](https://arstechnica.com/)    Sections    [Forum](/civis/)[Subscribe](/subscribe/)[Search](/search/)    * [AI](https://arstechnica.com/ai/)  * [Biz &amp;amp; IT](https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/)  * [Cars](https://arstechnica.com/cars/)  * [Culture](https://arstechnica.com/culture/)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of AMD’s Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 has sparked debate over the utility of its massive 208MB cache, with some arguing it primarily benefits niche simulation workloads while others suggest the performance gains actually stem from more aggressive clock curves &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47551723&quot; title=&quot;The extra cache doesn&amp;#39;t do a damn thing (maybe +2%) The lower leakage currents at lower voltages allowed them to implement a far more aggressive clock curve from the factory. That&amp;#39;s where the higher allcore clock comes from (+30W TDP) I&amp;#39;m not complaining at all, I think this is an excellent way to leverage binning to sell leftover cache. Though if I may complain, Ars used to actually write about such things in their articles instead of speculate in a way that suspiciously resembles what an AI…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47551875&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The extra cache doesn&amp;#39;t do a damn thing (maybe +2%) It depends on the task. For some memory-bound tasks the extra cache is very helpful. For CFD and other simulation workloads the benefits are huge. For other tasks it doesn&amp;#39;t help at all. If someone wants a simple gaming CPU or general purpose CPU they don&amp;#39;t need to spend the money for this. They don&amp;#39;t need the 16-core CPU at all. The 9850X3D is a better buy for most users who aren&amp;#39;t frequently doing a lot of highly parallel work&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. However, the conversation is dominated by extreme frustration regarding DDR5 memory prices, which have reportedly spiked from hundreds to thousands of dollars for high-capacity kits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47551594&quot; title=&quot;Probably fun for those who already bought DDR5 memory... still kicking myself for not just pulling the trigger on that 128GB dual stick kit I looked at for $600 back in September. Now it&amp;#39;s listed at $4k... Meanwhile I hope my AM4 will chug along a few more years.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47551926&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Now it&amp;#39;s listed at $4k... You can buy 128GB of DDR5-6000 with a 9950X3D (not this newest X2 version, but still a $699 CPU) and a motherboard and a case for $2800 right now: https://www.newegg.com/Product/ComboDealDetails?ItemList=Com... If you don&amp;#39;t need 128GB, there are quality 64GB kits for under $700 on Newegg right now, which is cheaper than this CPU. If someone needs to build something now and can wait to upgrade RAM in a year or two, 32GB kits are in the $370 range. I don&amp;#39;t like this…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47551848&quot; title=&quot;I really want a x3d because a game I play is heavily single threaded, I have the income and the financial stability but I can&amp;#39;t in any good conscious upgrade to am5 with the ram prices. It&amp;#39;s insane&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Users also highlight significant technical hurdles with the AM5 platform, specifically citing &amp;#34;dire&amp;#34; stability issues and 30-minute boot times when attempting to run four sticks of RAM &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47552410&quot; title=&quot;I bought 192GB (4x 48GB) of DDR5-6400 for 299 euro in September but returned it because I couldn&amp;#39;t get 4 DIMMS to run at decent speeds in the system. 6 or so weeks after I returned it the kit was listed at 1499.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47554881&quot; title=&quot;Got it running with 4800MT/s and literally 30 minute boot times in an AM5 machine. The 30 minute boot time could be worked around by enabling the (off-by-default) memory context restore option in BIOS, but it really made me think something was broken and it wasn&amp;#39;t until I found other people talking about 30 minute boot times that I stopped debugging and just let it sit for an eternity. It&amp;#39;s so bad. I don&amp;#39;t get why they sell AM5 motherboards with 4 RAM slots. At least that system has been…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://theopenreader.org/Journalism:CERN_Uses_Tiny_AI_Models_Burned_into_Silicon_for_Real-Time_LHC_Data_Filtering&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;CERN uses ultra-compact AI models on FPGAs for real-time LHC data filtering&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theopenreader.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47552562&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;325 points · 146 comments · by TORcicada&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CERN is deploying ultra-compact AI models directly onto FPGAs and ASICs to filter the Large Hadron Collider’s massive data stream in nanoseconds. This hardware-embedded &amp;#34;tiny AI&amp;#34; approach enables real-time selection of scientifically valuable particle collisions while discarding 99.98% of the unmanageable raw data. &lt;a href=&quot;https://theopenreader.org/Journalism:CERN_Uses_Tiny_AI_Models_Burned_into_Silicon_for_Real-Time_LHC_Data_Filtering&quot; title=&quot;Title: CERN Uses Tiny AI Models Burned into Silicon for Real-Time LHC Data Filtering    URL Source: https://theopenreader.org/Journalism:CERN_Uses_Tiny_AI_Models_Burned_into_Silicon_for_Real-Time_LHC_Data_Filtering    Published Time: 2026-03-28T15:12:24Z    Markdown Content:  # CERN Uses Tiny AI Models Burned into Silicon for Real-Time LHC Data Filtering  [Jump to content](https://theopenreader.org/Journalism:CERN_Uses_Tiny_AI_Models_Burned_into_Silicon_for_Real-Time_LHC_Data_Filtering#bodyContent)    -…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the perceived &amp;#34;hype&amp;#34; of labeling the technology as AI, with several users arguing that the term is being used as a marketing stand-in for traditional techniques like linear regression, hardcoded logic, or basic optimization algorithms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47553044&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m half expecting to see &amp;#39;AI model&amp;#39; appearing as stand-in for &amp;#39;linear regression&amp;#39; at this point in the cycle.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47552790&quot; title=&quot;A bit of hype in the AI wording here. This could be called a chip with hardcoded logic obtained with machine learning&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47553359&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m half expecting to see &amp;#39;AI model&amp;#39; appearing as stand-in for &amp;#39;if &amp;gt; 0&amp;#39; at this point in the cycle.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47553081&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m sure I&amp;#39;ve seen basic hill climbing (and other optimisation algorithms) described as AI, and then used evidence of AI solving real-world science/engineering problems.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters questioned the use of language models for this purpose &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47552685&quot; title=&quot;Does anyone know why they are using language models instead of a more purpose-built statistical model? My intuition is that a language model would either be overfit, or its training data would have a lot of noise unrelated to the application and significantly drive up costs.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others clarified that the implementation actually involves custom autoencoders with convolutional layers trained on experimental data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47552919&quot; title=&quot;They used a custom neural net with autoencoders, which contain convolutional layers. They trained it on previous experiment data. https://arxiv.org/html/2411.19506v1 Why is it so hard to elaborate what AI algorithm / technique they integrate? Would have made this article much better&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a technical debate regarding the article&amp;#39;s terminology, specifically the claim that FPGAs are &amp;#34;burned into silicon&amp;#34; and how these models compare to the simple perceptrons used in modern CPU branch prediction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47554089&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve got news for you, everybody with a modern cpu uses this, which use a perceptron for branch prediction.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47553609&quot; title=&quot;How are FPGAs &amp;#39;bruned into silicon&amp;#39;? Would be news to me that there are ASICs being taped out at CERN&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/J-x-Z/cocoa-way&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cocoa-Way – Native macOS Wayland compositor for running Linux apps seamlessly&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47553185&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;318 points · 111 comments · by OJFord&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cocoa-Way is a native macOS Wayland compositor written in Rust that allows users to stream Linux applications seamlessly with Metal/OpenGL hardware acceleration and HiDPI support, eliminating the need for XQuartz or virtual machine overhead. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/J-x-Z/cocoa-way&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - J-x-Z/cocoa-way: Native macOS Wayland Compositor written in Rust using Smithay. Experience seamless Linux app streaming on macOS without XQuartz.    URL Source: https://github.com/J-x-Z/cocoa-way    Markdown Content:  # GitHub - J-x-Z/cocoa-way: Native macOS Wayland Compositor written in Rust using Smithay. Experience seamless Linux app streaming on macOS without XQuartz. · GitHub    [Skip to content](https://github.com/J-x-Z/cocoa-way#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users question the need for a Wayland compositor given that many Linux apps have native macOS builds &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47553581&quot; title=&quot;Forgive the naivety, but what graphical Linux apps are people trying to run that don’t have native MacOS builds?  In my experience, Linux GUIs are generally written in Qt or GTK, both of which are multi-platform. I don’t doubt that they exist, I’m just struggling to think of a popular example.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others highlight its utility for remote window forwarding from Linux servers or lab clusters &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47555731&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s not the use case. The use case is running apps from a remote Linux host as a local window. A performant VNC for specific windows if you will. For example, you could run VS Code on that machine as a window on your Mac. A more real world example is people accessing guis (e.g. matlab) on lab clusters. The closest set up for x11 would be to use x11 forwarding with xpra.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47553811&quot; title=&quot;Apart from just running Linux apps, you can use this to run graphical applications remotely on a Linux server, like X11 forwarding.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also reveals a desire among some users to replace the macOS interface entirely with environments like KDE Plasma or COSMIC &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47553663&quot; title=&quot;I want to use KDE Plasma instead of Mac OS ugly (in my opinion) interface&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47554577&quot; title=&quot;Now, if only macOS still had the ability to drop to a Darwin shell without a GUI at all… we could just have a nice UNIX with something like KDE or COSMIC, brew as our package manager… what a dream.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, a debate emerged regarding keyboard shortcuts, with some finding macOS commands &amp;#34;insufferable&amp;#34; compared to Windows/Linux &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47553718&quot; title=&quot;Now if we could switch MacOS to use Win/Linux keyboard commands, MacOS wouldn&amp;#39;t be so insufferable&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, while others defend the macOS Command key as more efficient than the underutilized Windows key &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47553808&quot; title=&quot;Super key for most keybinds is much nicer than windows in my opinion, where it is entirely wasted on opening the start menu. On Linux it gains a few functions based on the desktop environment but not much.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47553960&quot; title=&quot;The use of the Windows key extends far beyond the start menu. Builtin functions include window management, invoking programs on the taskbar, locking the computer, invoking Explorer and Settings, invoking and controlling accessibility functions like Magnifier. The Microsoft Power Toys add a lot of functions using the Windows key by default as well, like screen snipping, screen OCR, color picking, enhanced clipboard, and many more.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/BoWang87/status/2037648937453232504&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Further human + AI + proof assistant work on Knuth&amp;#39;s &amp;quot;Claude Cycles&amp;quot; problem&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47557166&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;252 points · 173 comments · by mean_mistreater&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Large language models, in collaboration with humans and proof assistants, have fully solved Donald Knuth’s &amp;#34;Claude’s Cycles&amp;#34; mathematical problem. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/BoWang87/status/2037648937453232504&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Knuth Claude&amp;amp;#x27;s Cycles note update: problem now fully solved, by LLMs&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47306926&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47306926&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt; - March 2026 (2 comments)&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;chatgpt.com&amp;amp;#x2F;share&amp;amp;#x2F;69aaab4b-888c-8003-9a02-d1df80f9c791&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;chatgpt.com&amp;amp;#x2F;share&amp;amp;#x2F;69aaab4b-888c-8003-9a02-d1df80f9c7...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Claude&amp;amp;#x27;s Cycles [pdf]&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a consensus that AI is uniquely suited for formal mathematics due to its ability to navigate &amp;#34;low depth, high breadth&amp;#34; logical trees, with some predicting that Reinforcement Learning on Lean syntax will eventually surpass LLMs in this domain &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558172&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve always said this but AI will win a fields medal before being able to manage a McDonald&amp;#39;s. Math seems difficult to us because it&amp;#39;s like using a hammer (the brain) to twist in a screw (math). LLMs are discovering a lot of new math because they are great at low depth high breadth situations. I predict that in the future people will ditch LLMs in favor of AlphaGo style RL done on Lean syntax trees.   These should be able to think on much larger timescales. Any professional mathematician will…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558299&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; AI will win a fields medal before being able to manage a McDonald&amp;#39;s Of course, because it takes multi-modal intelligence to manage a McDonalds. I.e. it requires human intelligence. &amp;gt; I predict that in the future people will ditch LLMs in favor of AlphaGo style RL Same for coding as well. LLM&amp;#39;s might be the interface we use with other forms of AI though.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users celebrate the potential for AI to automate complex tasks like reverse engineering and proofs—freeing humans for leisure and philosophy—others express deep concern that this &amp;#34;race to the bottom&amp;#34; will render technical skills worthless and displace workers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47557539&quot; title=&quot;I got Claude to self reference and update its own instructions to solve making a typed proxy API of any website. After a week, scores of iterations, it can reverse engineer any website. The first few days I had to be deeply involved with each iteration loop. Domain knowledge is helpful. Each time I saw a problem I would ask Claude to update its instructions so it doesn&amp;#39;t happen again. Then less and less. Eventually it got to the point it was updating and improving the metrics every iteration…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47557746&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I went to the coffeeshop and drank very good coffee listening to music. Then at night I sat and had a beer thinking about T.S. Eliot&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;The Wasteland&amp;#39;, the effect of industrialization in England at that time and his views of how ennui affected the aristocracy. Well, for those among us that are not aristocracy already, except for the vanishingly small number of people required to oversee such processes, we’re probably the closest we’re going to get to it. If they don’t need people to do the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47557792&quot; title=&quot;I kind of feel like software engineers working on improving AI are traitors working against other SE’s trying to make a living. However… I have to acknowledge my craft of SE has been putting people out of work for decades. I myself came up with business process improvement that directly let the company release about 20 people. I did this twice. So… fair play.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a notable disagreement over the nature of intelligence: some argue that managing a McDonald&amp;#39;s or building Linux is more difficult for AI than math because it requires multi-modal, human-centric intelligence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558172&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve always said this but AI will win a fields medal before being able to manage a McDonald&amp;#39;s. Math seems difficult to us because it&amp;#39;s like using a hammer (the brain) to twist in a screw (math). LLMs are discovering a lot of new math because they are great at low depth high breadth situations. I predict that in the future people will ditch LLMs in favor of AlphaGo style RL done on Lean syntax trees.   These should be able to think on much larger timescales. Any professional mathematician will…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558299&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; AI will win a fields medal before being able to manage a McDonald&amp;#39;s Of course, because it takes multi-modal intelligence to manage a McDonalds. I.e. it requires human intelligence. &amp;gt; I predict that in the future people will ditch LLMs in favor of AlphaGo style RL Same for coding as well. LLM&amp;#39;s might be the interface we use with other forms of AI though.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558350&quot; title=&quot;Something like building Linux is more akin to managing a McDonald&amp;#39;s than it is to a 10 page technical proof in Algebraic Groups. Programming is more multimodal than math. Something like performance engineering might be free lunch though&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c86e3eglv2go&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Fear and denial in Silicon Valley over social media addiction trial&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47550726&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;165 points · &lt;strong&gt;232 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by 1659447091&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Los Angeles jury found Meta and YouTube liable for designing addictive platforms that harmed a young woman&amp;#39;s mental health, awarding $6 million in damages and setting a significant legal precedent that tech giants fear could trigger thousands of similar lawsuits. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c86e3eglv2go&quot; title=&quot;Title: Silicon Valley reeling from social media addiction trial verdict    URL Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c86e3eglv2go    Published Time: 2026-03-28T00:54:37.802Z    Markdown Content:  # Silicon Valley reeling from social media addiction trial verdict    [Skip to content](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c86e3eglv2go#main-content)    [Watch Live](https://www.bbc.com/watch-live-news/)    [](https://www.bbc.com/)    *   [Home](https://www.bbc.com/)   *   [News](https://www.bbc.com/news)   *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided over whether social media is uniquely &amp;#34;addictive&amp;#34; or merely a modern scapegoat for age-old moral panics and corporate profit-seeking &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47550864&quot; title=&quot;We all know they&amp;#39;re addictive, they&amp;#39;re designed to be addictive, and they&amp;#39;re very, very harmful, to both adults and children. The individuals who are profiting from the harm are clearly identifiable. And that harm directly targets children. That this is allowed to continue is a symptom of a sick society.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47551118&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s wild to me how many people are willing to throw basic civil liberties overboard because they don&amp;#39;t like the other guys. Today&amp;#39;s media circus is about addictive social media. Before that it was video games and rock music and D&amp;amp;D clubs. Before that it the Satanic panic of the 80s, gay &amp;#39;recruitment&amp;#39;, Soviet spies. Much before that it was witches and heretics. And so on and so on, forever. If you have a choice, maybe don&amp;#39;t be part of the pitchfork wielding mob? The people with the pitchforks…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents of regulation argue that platforms are intentionally engineered with billions of dollars to exploit human psychology in ways traditional media and retail do not &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47550963&quot; title=&quot;Screens on their own aren’t “uniquely and magically addictive”, but infinitely scrollable short form video delivered through that screen is, because a few companies spent billions on the smartest minds in the world to make it so.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47550957&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think that is really true though. People aren&amp;#39;t becoming addicted to grocery stores, ice cream parlours and restaurants, or even cable television to nearly (any?) degree. None of those are engineered to addict you in nearly the same degree or magnitude.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, skeptics warn that treating screens like drugs invites dangerous government overreach and ignores that many users simply find these platforms boring or a poor substitute for lost real-world communities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47551078&quot; title=&quot;I have no love for social media, but I also really don&amp;#39;t like the idea of the government regulating how apps are designed, or trying to circumnavigate online privacy to &amp;#39;protect children&amp;#39; which where I see this whole thing going. On another note, personally I&amp;#39;m not sure I buy the &amp;#39;addictive&amp;#39; argument with social media, maybe its just me but I find social media pretty boring, but I think for a lot of younger people it is something that fills a need for meaning and connection to the world that…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47550903&quot; title=&quot;What these corporations were trying to do is bad and vaguely feasible to a degree. I think it&amp;#39;s bad enough regulation could apply. But there is an additional consideration that&amp;#39;s really important in how we as a society deal with this. Screens are not drugs. They are not somehow uniquely and magically addictive (like drugs actually are). The multi-media is not the problem and not the device to be regulated. The corporate structure and motivations are the problem. This issue literally applies to…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lzon.ca/posts/other/thoughts-ai-era/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The first 40 months of the AI era&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lzon.ca)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47557185&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;211 points · 139 comments · by jpmitchell&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An IT expert reflects on 40 months of AI evolution, noting that while tools like Claude Code provide impressive &amp;#34;vibe coding&amp;#34; and motivational assistance, AI-generated content remains unappealingly &amp;#34;uncanny&amp;#34; and often requires significant human revision to be truly useful. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lzon.ca/posts/other/thoughts-ai-era/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Lzon.ca. A personal blog, by a programmer and IT expert.    URL Source: https://lzon.ca/posts/other/thoughts-ai-era/    Markdown Content:  # The first 40 months of the AI era    [](https://lzon.ca/) lzon.ca    [Home](https://lzon.ca/)[Blog](https://lzon.ca/posts)[](https://lzon.ca/toys)[](https://lzon.ca/more)    ## The first 40 months of the AI era    [Blog](https://lzon.ca/posts/)    [Other](https://lzon.ca/posts/other/)     The first 40 months of the AI era     Posted March 28, 2026  9 min read     Here…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users report that AI has significantly lowered the barrier for non-programmers to build complex software, though experienced developers often struggle with the urge to understand the underlying code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559336&quot; title=&quot;I would agree with the utility of Claude and Claude Code.  Claude feels like your own executive assistant, sales team and IT department.  Combine that with Claude Code and you can build some incredible things.  Myself as an example, I used Claude to advise me on starting a business and building a MVP.  After a few weeks of refinement I was able to create something I never could have done without Claude.  It is a game changer for sure.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559536&quot; title=&quot;Several of my friends who don&amp;#39;t know any programming are creating video games and music software with AI agents. Much of what they are doing is incomprehensible to me. I often find that being a programmer is actually holding me back in this regard, because I feel the need to understand everything the code is doing, as well as the specialized knowledge (e.g. the math involved in audio processing and sound effects). Whereas my friends can just say... yeah add a phaser effect to the synth and it…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue LLMs are superior at generating documentation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559982&quot; title=&quot;then you should be delighted we have LLMs one of the use cases they are best suited to is writing documentation, much better than humans can.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the massive investment in AI has come at the expense of high-quality, human-written API documentation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559189&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; While I’m certain that this technology is producing some productivity improvements, I’m still genuinely (and frustratingly) unsure just how much of an improvement it is actually creating. I often wonder how much more productive I&amp;#39;d be if just a fraction the effort and money poured into LLMs was spent on better API documentation and conventional coding tools. A lot of the time, I&amp;#39;m resorting to using an AI because I can&amp;#39;t get information on how the current API of some-thing works into my brain…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559394&quot; title=&quot;My favorite thing is when some projects now have better documentation in their Claude skills or MCPs than they ever did for users.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. A consensus is emerging around &amp;#34;Claude Creep,&amp;#34; where the ease of generation leads to expanded project scopes and a shift in labor toward the final 30% of &amp;#34;hard&amp;#34; tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558612&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; To what degree did I expand scope because I knew I could do more using the AI? Someone at work recently termed this “Claude Creep”. It’s so easy to generate things push you towards going further but the reality is that’s you’re setting yourself up for more and more work to get them over the line.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558865&quot; title=&quot;the flip side of claude creep is that the easy parts are now genuinely free, which means all your time goes to the 30% that was already hard. ai doesn&amp;#39;t save you time on the hard bits, it just eliminates the excuse to not have done the easy bits first.what&amp;#39;s helped: think in postconditions, not tasks. instead of &amp;#39;add feature X&amp;#39;, define &amp;#39;the tests pass and the user can do Y&amp;#39;. the agent figures out what X means. without that anchor there&amp;#39;s nothing to mark as done, so scope drifts indefinitely.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Regarding AI-written text, users disagree on its prevalence: some find it difficult to detect &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558634&quot; title=&quot;Do you regularly find text content that you know is AI written (but is not marked as such)? Because honestly I don&amp;#39;t, and it must exist in decent quantity by now. Or perhaps it&amp;#39;s still sparse?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, while others claim the distinct &amp;#34;voice&amp;#34; of specific models makes unedited AI content increasingly easy to identify and dismiss &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558781&quot; title=&quot;Nice observation about AI-generated content: &amp;gt; I’ve had the idea that from a social perspective it’d be regarded like plastic surgery, in that it only looks weird when its over-done, or done badly.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558974&quot; title=&quot;You will start to recognize it over time. The major AI models each have their own voice and patterns that they overuse. The more you see those patterns the more you start recognizing them. By now I can recognize quickly if a blog post or README.md was generated by Claude or ChatGPT because the signs are so obvious. Even Hacker News comments that are AI written are easy to spot if they weren&amp;#39;t edited. I know I&amp;#39;m not alone because when I recognize an AI comment I check their comment history and…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/mar/28/the-great-care-home-cash-grab-how-private-equity-turned-vulnerable-elderly-people-into-human-atms&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Private equity turned vulnerable elderly people into human ATMs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theguardian.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558372&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;188 points · 133 comments · by mordechai9000&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of private equity in the UK care home sector, exemplified by the collapse of Four Seasons Health Care, has been criticized for prioritizing leveraged buyouts and debt-driven profits over the safety and quality of life of vulnerable elderly residents. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/mar/28/the-great-care-home-cash-grab-how-private-equity-turned-vulnerable-elderly-people-into-human-atms&quot; title=&quot;Title: The great care home cash grab: how private equity turned vulnerable elderly people into human ATMs    URL Source: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/mar/28/the-great-care-home-cash-grab-how-private-equity-turned-vulnerable-elderly-people-into-human-atms    Published Time: 2026-03-28T12:00:26.000Z    Markdown Content:  O n a spring morning in 1987, a 30-year-old man named Robert Kilgour pulled up beside a row of foamy cherry trees in the town of Kirkcaldy, on Scotland’s east coast, to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights the &amp;#34;captive audience&amp;#34; nature of elder care, where private equity acquisitions often lead to aggressive cost-cutting, reduced staffing, and price hikes that vulnerable residents cannot escape &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559002&quot; title=&quot;My parents ended up being forced by circumstances to move into a retirement home about five years ago.  Fortunately, the place turned out to be run by people who mostly cared about their clients and so my parents&amp;#39; lives were basically OK, except that the food sucked (which AFAICT is par for the course at retirement homes).  But a few months ago the place was acquired by a different company, which is trying to squeeze out higher profits.  Staffing and services are being cut, and prices are going…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559200&quot; title=&quot;To be fair, my mother had cancer and my father had Parkinson&amp;#39;s, and that was a much bigger factor in their ultimate quality of life than any deficiencies in the retirement home they found themselves in.  So I don&amp;#39;t mean &amp;#39;thankfully&amp;#39; in the sense that &amp;#39;thankfully they died prematurely so they didn&amp;#39;t have to suffer under their home&amp;#39;s new management&amp;#39;, I mean it, &amp;#39;Thankfully the natural course of their lives timed their deaths so that they were minimally affected by the new management.&amp;#39; But yeah,…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that the core issue is the intersection of skyrocketing housing and healthcare costs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559195&quot; title=&quot;I’m sure the new owners are scummy, but the fundamental problem isn’t scummy people. There’s lots of markets that are okay-ish notwithstanding scummy people. Even those with natural lock in effects. The fundamental problem is it is at the intersection of two out of the three areas of the economy that have had insane cost growth over the last 30 years—-housing and healthcare (the third is education.) For the first one we know roughly what we need to do but won’t. For the second we don’t even…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest that the lack of personal liability for corporate actors enables this predatory behavior &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558486&quot; title=&quot;Private equity didn&amp;#39;t. People did. We really need to get rid of limited liability and corporate fictions.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Proposed alternatives to institutional care include multi-generational households &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558669&quot; title=&quot;multi-generational households&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, home-based medical services &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559094&quot; title=&quot;Where I live Medicare and Medicaid want people to live (and die) in their own homes. They send out nurses and nurse practitioners to you. That is what I want. After some research I realized the provider that I want which is UTSW in Dallas has a geographical radius that they serve. I am planning to eventually move to be within that radius. https://utswmed.org/medblog/geriatrics-cove-team-makes-house...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, and a &amp;#34;steel man&amp;#34; defense of private equity as a necessary mechanism for market efficiency, despite its negative reputation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559299&quot; title=&quot;Could someone (please not an LLM) attempt to steel man the following position for me: Private equity is overall good for society&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559393&quot; title=&quot;Broadly speaking, private equity is used to describe anything leveraged we don’t like. When we like it, we tend to describe it as a start-up, family business or simply “firm.”&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/chenglou/pretext&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Pretext: TypeScript library for multiline text measurement and layout&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47556290&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;262 points · 47 comments · by emersonmacro&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pretext is a new TypeScript library designed for high-performance multiline text measurement and layout. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/chenglou/pretext&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;x.com&amp;amp;#x2F;_chenglou&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2037713766205608234&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;x.com&amp;amp;#x2F;_chenglou&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2037713766205608234&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;_chenglou&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2037713766205608234&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;_chenglou&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2037713766205608234&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Demos: &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;chenglou.me&amp;amp;#x2F;pretext&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pretext is a TypeScript library designed to solve the &amp;#34;absurdly hard&amp;#34; problem of calculating text height and layout without triggering expensive DOM reflows &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566216&quot; title=&quot;This thing is very impressive. The problem it solves is efficiently calculating the height of some wrapped text on a web page, without actually rendering that text to the page first (very expensive). It does that by pre-calculating the width/height of individual segments - think words - and caching those. Then it implements the full algorithm for how browsers construct text strings by line-wrapping those segments using custom code. This is absurdly hard because of the many different types of…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565540&quot; title=&quot;Some details on how it works from a code comment: Problem: DOM-based text measurement (getBoundingClientRect, offsetHeight)  forces synchronous layout reflow. When components independently measure text,  each measurement triggers a reflow of the entire document. This creates  read/write interleaving that can cost 30ms+ per frame for 500 text blocks. Solution: two-phase measurement centered around canvas measureText. prepare(text, font) — segments text via Intl.Segmenter, measures each word  via…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. It achieves high performance by pre-calculating and caching word segments via `canvas.measureText` and then using pure arithmetic for layout, allowing for sub-millisecond updates during resizes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47569061&quot; title=&quot;prepare uses measure text, if it is in a for loop, it won&amp;#39;t be fast. This library is meant to do prepare once and then layout many times. layout calls should be sub-1 ms.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565540&quot; title=&quot;Some details on how it works from a code comment: Problem: DOM-based text measurement (getBoundingClientRect, offsetHeight)  forces synchronous layout reflow. When components independently measure text,  each measurement triggers a reflow of the entire document. This creates  read/write interleaving that can cost 30ms+ per frame for 500 text blocks. Solution: two-phase measurement centered around canvas measureText. prepare(text, font) — segments text via Intl.Segmenter, measures each word  via…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users noted that simpler alternatives exist for basic Latin text, Pretext is distinguished by its handling of complex edge cases like emojis, soft hyphens, and browser-specific rendering discrepancies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47568878&quot; title=&quot;i wrote something similar for this purpose, but much simpler and in 2kb, without AI, about a year ago. uWrap.js: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43583478 . it did not reach 11k stars overnight, tho :D for ASCII text, mine finishes in 80ms, while pretext takes 2200ms. i haven&amp;#39;t yet checked pretext for accuracy (how closely it matches the browser), but will test tonight - i expect it will do well. let&amp;#39;s see how close pretext can get to 80ms (or better) without adopting the same tricks.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47569054&quot; title=&quot;Looks like uWrap only handles latin characters and doesn&amp;#39;t deal with things like soft hyphens or emoji correction, plus uWrap only handles white-space: pre-line while Pretext doesn&amp;#39;t handle pre-line but does handle both normal and pre-wrap.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566419&quot; title=&quot;I said it elsewhere but will repeat it here: This is incredibly impressive, many of this things have been missing for forever! I remember the first time I couldn&amp;#39;t figure out how do a proper responsive accordion, it was with bootstrap 1, released in 2011 !! Today it&amp;#39;s still not properly solved (until now?). Many of thing things belong in css no in js, but this has been the pattern with so many things in the web 1) web needs evolve into more complex needs  2) hacky js/css implementation and…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics questioned how it compares to existing solutions like Skia-wasm and noted that some of its use cases, such as smooth accordion animations, are beginning to be addressed by new CSS standards like `interpolate-size` &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566122&quot; title=&quot;Quick overview of pretext: if you want to layout text on the web, you have to use canvas.measureText API and implement line-breaking / segmentation / RTL yourself. Pretext makes this easier. Just pass the text and text properties (font, color, size, etc) into a pure JS API and it layouts the content into given viewport dimension. Earlier you&amp;#39;ll have to either use measureText or ship harbuzz to browser somehow. I guess pretext is not a technical breakthrough, just the right things assembled to…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47566097&quot; title=&quot;Love this. I especially liked shape based reflow example. This is something I&amp;#39;ve been thinking for ages and would love to add to Ensō (enso.sonnet.io), purely because it would allow me to apply better caret transitions between the lines of text. (I&amp;#39;m not gonna do that because I&amp;#39;m trying to keep it simple, but it&amp;#39;s a strong temptation) Now a CSS tangent: regarding the accordion example from the site ( https://chenglou.me/pretext/accordion ), this can be solved with pure CSS (and then perhaps a…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://astrid.tech/2026/03/28/0/linux-is-an-interpreter/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Linux is an interpreter&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (astrid.tech)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47556359&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;237 points · 57 comments · by frizlab&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article explores the concept of the Linux kernel as an interpreter for initrds, demonstrating a recursive &amp;#34;quine&amp;#34; OS that uses `kexec` to continuously replace itself with its own image and leveraging `binfmt_misc` to execute CPIO archives as standalone programs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://astrid.tech/2026/03/28/0/linux-is-an-interpreter/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Linux is an interpreter    URL Source: https://astrid.tech/2026/03/28/0/linux-is-an-interpreter/    Published Time: 2026-03-28T06:33:00-07:00    Markdown Content:  # Linux is an interpreter    # [astrid dot tech](https://astrid.tech/)    *   [Blog](https://astrid.tech/blog)   *   [Projects](https://astrid.tech/projects)   *   [Computers](https://astrid.tech/computers)   *   [About](https://astrid.tech/about)     # Linux is an interpreter    And why you would want to exec a cpio    2026-03-28…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether the Linux kernel can be classified as an interpreter, with critics arguing that the author conflates the kernel with shell programs and misrepresents how hardware executes binary instructions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558864&quot; title=&quot;No. The OS&amp;#39;s software doesn&amp;#39;t individually read each instruction and decide what to do with it. It passes it off to the hardware (CPU) which runs the instructions.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558457&quot; title=&quot;This article was painful to read because of all the misconceptions. A cpio archive is not a filesystem. Author uses initramfs, which is based on tmpfs. Linux can extract cpio to tmpfs. An archive of files and directories is in itself not a program. Just because something looks similar doesn&amp;#39;t mean it&amp;#39;s equivalent. Binary programs are executed on the CPU, so if there&amp;#39;s an interpreter involed it&amp;#39;s hiding in the hardware environment. That&amp;#39;s outside the scope of an OS kernel. If you have a shell…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest that modern CPUs function as interpreters via microcode or thunks, others maintain these are hardware-level operations outside the scope of an OS &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559225&quot; title=&quot;Most of the time. But sometimes, no. See ATL thunk emulation (last I checked, still alive in the windows kernel) and ntvdm handling of the BOP pseudoinstruction. See also: Jazelle DBX. Hell, on modern x86 processors, many “native” instructions are actually a series of micro-ops for a mostly undocumented and mostly poorly understood microcode architecture that differs from the natively documented instruction set. It’s turtles all the way down.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559514&quot; title=&quot;Jazelle and micro-ops are not interpreters, they are executed in hardware.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, a debate emerged regarding &amp;#34;professionalism,&amp;#34; questioning whether spending 50 hours of labor to save $1.50 in infrastructure costs is a productive use of a developer&amp;#39;s time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47556965&quot; title=&quot;From earlier in the series. &amp;#39;Okay, so the reason I initially did this was because I didn’t want to pay Contabo an extra $1.50/mo to have object storage just to be able to spawn VPSes from premade disk images.&amp;#39; I think there&amp;#39;s a sweetspot between &amp;#39; I spent 50 hours to save 1.50$/mo&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;every engineer should be spending 250K$/mo in tokens&amp;#39;. Host employees still need to eat, if we can&amp;#39;t afford 1.50$/mo, then we aren&amp;#39;t really professionals and are just coasting on real infrastructure subsidized…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47557589&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; if we can&amp;#39;t afford 1.50$/mo, then we aren&amp;#39;t really professionals and are just coasting on real infrastructure subsidized by professionals This is a strange claim. Whether someone is getting paid or not to do something is what determines who is a professional, not whether or how much they&amp;#39;re paying someone else.  (And that&amp;#39;s the only thing that matters, unlike the way that &amp;#39;professional&amp;#39; is used as a euphemism in Americans&amp;#39; bizarre discursive repertoire.)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47557935&quot; title=&quot;I think the sense of the word professional here is not as a boolean professional/amateur, but the sense of professionalism, the characteristic of taking business seriously, not letting personal matters intervene, and in this case, investing into tools. To put an example, suppose you hire a painter, and they show up with non-work attire, no ladder, no brush, they ask you to buy a can of paint for them and a brush. Compared to a contractor that bills you flat and brins their own ladder, has work…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/rajko-horvat/OpenCiv1&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OpenCiv1 – open-source rewrite of Civ1&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47557064&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;189 points · 67 comments · by caminanteblanco&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenCiv1 is an open-source, cross-platform rewrite of the 1991 game Civilization 1, developed in C# to run natively on Windows, Linux, and macOS. While currently playable, it requires original game files to operate legally as it replaces legacy code with modern, copyright-free alternatives. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/rajko-horvat/OpenCiv1&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - rajko-horvat/OpenCiv1: Open source rewrite of the original Civilization 1 Game designed by Sid Meier and Bruce Shelley in year 1991    URL Source: https://github.com/rajko-horvat/OpenCiv1    Markdown Content:  # GitHub - rajko-horvat/OpenCiv1: Open source rewrite of the original Civilization 1 Game designed by Sid Meier and Bruce Shelley in year 1991 · GitHub    [Skip to content](https://github.com/rajko-horvat/OpenCiv1#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the legal and technical challenges of acquiring original game files, with users suggesting eBay, thrift stores, or &amp;#34;high quality backups&amp;#34; online since the game is unavailable on modern storefronts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558461&quot; title=&quot;Since this requires some files from the original Civilization how do people obtain legal copies of the game? It&amp;#39;s not available on Steam or GOG (Or am I being hopelessly naïve by asking such a question?)&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558859&quot; title=&quot;I mean from a legal perspective, original media is the only recourse. But if we expand the options we&amp;#39;re willing to avail ourselves of, there&amp;#39;s a lot of high quality backups online. So far as I know, Take-Two Interactive is extremely lenient, especially since they don&amp;#39;t offer any way to purchase Civ1 or 2&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558552&quot; title=&quot;You go on eBay or similar site and you pay for a used copy on floppy or CD-ROM. Then using the appropriate tool you back those files up and use them for OpenCiv 1. Cheap, no. Convenient, no. But legal. If you&amp;#39;re lucky you stumble across it in a thrift store that wasn&amp;#39;t paying particular attention and assumed it was a puzzle or a board game.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate whether Civ 1 remains special compared to its direct successor Civ 2 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558903&quot; title=&quot;Can anyone give some hints on what made Civ 1 special compared to other classic entries in the franchise? Despite the nostalgia factor, of course.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558920&quot; title=&quot;Honestly it feels to me that Civ1 - Civ2 is the most direct upgrade in the series. Civ 2 was mostly just a better civ 1. From civ4 onwards, the series was a lot more willing to shake things up in its gameplay.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that DOS remains a robust platform for 2D gaming via emulation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558791&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The game is still very popular and easy to play. But the obsoletness of DOS Nothing obsolete about DOS when it comes to playing 2D games. Thanks to DOSBox and other emulators (FreeDOS is also not bad though) it is a fantastic OS (or virtual machine). DOS as a platform for (2D) games has never been better than it is today, on modern hardware running DOSBox.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a cautionary note regarding the project&amp;#39;s legal status, as the source code may be considered a derivative work of the original 16-bit opcodes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558801&quot; title=&quot;This is a cool project, but the author should note that they _are_ likely creating a derivative version of Civ1 here. It might look somewhat different, but that&amp;#39;s clearly just 16-bit (?) intel opcodes in a slightly spicier form. It&amp;#39;s very unlikely this sort of approach will end up with a copyright-free codebase, though it might be useful as a source for a cleanroom approach. The author shouldn&amp;#39;t be discouraged -- lots of other recompilation efforts work this was as well, but it&amp;#39;s a muddy place…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-03-27</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-03-27</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.windowscentral.com/microsoft/windows-11/people-inside-microsoft-are-fighting-to-drop-windows-11s-mandatory-microsoft-account-requirements-during-setup&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;People inside Microsoft are fighting to drop mandatory Microsoft Account&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (windowscentral.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47542695&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;754 points · 608 comments · by breve&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Internal advocates at Microsoft are reportedly pushing to remove the mandatory Microsoft account requirement for Windows 11 setup, a move aimed at addressing one of the platform&amp;#39;s most frequent user complaints. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.windowscentral.com/microsoft/windows-11/people-inside-microsoft-are-fighting-to-drop-windows-11s-mandatory-microsoft-account-requirements-during-setup&quot; title=&quot;Microsoft insiders push to end mandatory Microsoft Accounts on Windows 11    Microsoft&amp;#39;s big sweeping set of changes coming soon to Windows 11 don&amp;#39;t address its controversial Microsoft account requirements, but that might soon change.    [Skip to main content](#main)    ![](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/awqs9mdy1c1770717147.svg)Join The Club    - Join our community    JOIN NOW    11    Premium Benefits    24/7    Access Available    9K+    Active…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Internal conflict at Microsoft reflects a struggle between product quality and the push to use Windows as a marketing channel for other services &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47544125&quot; title=&quot;This &amp;#39;make Windows better&amp;#39; push is far more political than technological. It&amp;#39;s a fight with other divisions about using Windows as a marketing and sales channel for other products and services. It has to be a decision from the very top. I hope they realize that Windows is in significant danger, the majority market share for Desktop OS is not guaranteed anymore. It&amp;#39;s not just 10% of revenue, it&amp;#39;s a foundation for how enterprises ended up on Azure and are bringing big money. I&amp;#39;m still a Windows…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Users express deep frustration with &amp;#34;consumer unfriendly&amp;#34; features like forced updates, persistent ads, and the difficulty of disabling unwanted services like OneDrive &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47544138&quot; title=&quot;I would never advise anyone buy a Microsoft Windows laptop these days — between the forced updates, the account and service-fee thirst, ads, and consumer unfriendly product release process (forced opt-in). Guess what? With Apple&amp;#39;s new Neo laptop the price is also way way wayyy out to lunch. If MSFT gives a business a huge bulk discount to buy their laptops + Office360 + Teams... OK? But as a &amp;#39;consumer&amp;#39; it really sucks. Want PC gaming? Steamdeck or Steambox.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47544836&quot; title=&quot;As someone with a sizeable background in Linux system engineering.. I prefer Windows to MacOS. It&amp;#39;s IMHO a better desktop now with the edge snap tile layout and etc. Excellent device compatibility. And I get my linux environment needs satisfied via WSL2 these days. But damn if they don&amp;#39;t get in their own way. I have my own Pro licenses, and even with Pro turning off ads and features is text book whack-a-mole: * Frequent &amp;#39;Let&amp;#39;s finish setting up your PC&amp;#39; after updates * Killing OneDrive is a…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue Windows&amp;#39; market share is in &amp;#34;significant danger&amp;#34; due to these practices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47544125&quot; title=&quot;This &amp;#39;make Windows better&amp;#39; push is far more political than technological. It&amp;#39;s a fight with other divisions about using Windows as a marketing and sales channel for other products and services. It has to be a decision from the very top. I hope they realize that Windows is in significant danger, the majority market share for Desktop OS is not guaranteed anymore. It&amp;#39;s not just 10% of revenue, it&amp;#39;s a foundation for how enterprises ended up on Azure and are bringing big money. I&amp;#39;m still a Windows…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47545036&quot; title=&quot;Decline often happens slowly, gradually and then suddenly. Could anybody imagine Intel where it is now ? This could happen to Microsoft and is probably already happening as we speak.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that entrenched government and enterprise contracts ensure dominance for decades to come &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47544986&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I hope they realize that Windows is in significant danger, the majority market share for Desktop OS is not guaranteed anymore. i agree with most of what you said, but this is borderline fantasy. the majority of home market share is not guaranteed, sure. with how good gaming is on non-windows machines now, there isnt much for a home user to get locked-in with (except games that require windows-only malware i.e. anticheat) but government, institution (hospitals, universities, etc.) and large…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47545054&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; gradually and then suddenly. governments, institutions, and large enterprises (like, thousands of people) do not have the power to do anything &amp;#39;suddenly&amp;#39;. they have contracts, and cash flow concerns. you cannot suddenly replaces tens to hundreds of thousands of machines. 20-50 years down the road? maybe! they (microsoft) surely arent doing themselves many favors. but they are certainly not in &amp;#39;significant danger&amp;#39; today.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these grievances, some power users still prefer Windows for its superior keyboard shortcuts and window management compared to macOS &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47544125&quot; title=&quot;This &amp;#39;make Windows better&amp;#39; push is far more political than technological. It&amp;#39;s a fight with other divisions about using Windows as a marketing and sales channel for other products and services. It has to be a decision from the very top. I hope they realize that Windows is in significant danger, the majority market share for Desktop OS is not guaranteed anymore. It&amp;#39;s not just 10% of revenue, it&amp;#39;s a foundation for how enterprises ended up on Azure and are bringing big money. I&amp;#39;m still a Windows…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47544836&quot; title=&quot;As someone with a sizeable background in Linux system engineering.. I prefer Windows to MacOS. It&amp;#39;s IMHO a better desktop now with the edge snap tile layout and etc. Excellent device compatibility. And I get my linux environment needs satisfied via WSL2 these days. But damn if they don&amp;#39;t get in their own way. I have my own Pro licenses, and even with Pro turning off ads and features is text book whack-a-mole: * Frequent &amp;#39;Let&amp;#39;s finish setting up your PC&amp;#39; after updates * Killing OneDrive is a…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47544466&quot; title=&quot;FWIW I&amp;#39;ve been on a OS X for many years now, but I still miss keyboard shortcuts in Windows. So much more consistent across the operating system and applications...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://xn--gckvb8fzb.com/hold-on-to-your-hardware/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hold on to Your Hardware&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (xn--gckvb8fzb.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47540833&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;651 points · 521 comments · by LucidLynx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rising demand from AI data centers and enterprise &amp;#34;hyperscalers&amp;#34; is causing severe global shortages and price hikes for RAM, SSDs, and GPUs, threatening the future of affordable consumer hardware ownership and independence. &lt;a href=&quot;https://xn--gckvb8fzb.com/hold-on-to-your-hardware/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Hold on to Your Hardware    URL Source: https://xn--gckvb8fzb.com/hold-on-to-your-hardware/    Published Time: 2026-02-20 00:53:55 +0900 +0900    Markdown Content:  # マリウス . Hold on to Your Hardware    *   [](https://xn--gckvb8fzb.com/ &amp;#39;マリウス&amp;#39;)  *   [Journal](https://xn--gckvb8fzb.com/collection/journal/)  *   [Updates](https://xn--gckvb8fzb.com/collection/updates/)  *   [Guides](https://xn--gckvb8fzb.com/collection/guides/)  *   [Reviews](https://xn--gckvb8fzb.com/collection/reviews/)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on whether a hardware supply crunch is imminent, with some citing resource shortages like helium &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47541237&quot; title=&quot;Just to mention one thing, helium -which is a necessity for chip production- is a byproduct of LNG production. And 20% of that is just gone (Qatar) and the question is how long it will take to get that back. So not only a chip shortage because of AI buying chips in huge volumes but also because production will be hampered. Tongue in cheek: we urgently need fusion power plants. For the AI and the helium.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt; while others predict a &amp;#34;demand crunch&amp;#34; where high-end consumer hardware loses economies of scale as users shift to cloud-based compute &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47541161&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t buy the central thesis of the article. We won&amp;#39;t be in a supply crunch forever. However, I do believe that we&amp;#39;re at an inflection point where DC hardware is diverging rapidly from consumer compute. Most consumers are using laptops and laptops are not keeping pace with where the frontier is in a singular compute node. Laptops are increasingly just clients for someone else&amp;#39;s compute that you rent, or buy a time slice with your eyeballs, much like smartphones pretty much always have been. I…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47541519&quot; title=&quot;We won&amp;#39;t be in a supply crunch forever. We&amp;#39;ll have a demand crunch. The demand of powerful consumer hardware will shrink so much that producing them will lose the economics of scale. It &amp;#39;ve always been bound to happen, just delayed by the trend of pursuing realistic graphics for games. People who are willing to drop $20k on a computer might not be affected much tho.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that modern laptops are more than powerful enough for most tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47541377&quot; title=&quot;The thing is, other than AI stuff, where does a non powerful computer limit you? My phone has 16gigs of ram and a terabyte of storage, laptops today are ridiculous compared to anything I studied with. I&amp;#39;m not arguing mind you, just trying to understand the usecases people are thinking of here.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543997&quot; title=&quot;Apple just launched a $600 amazing laptop and the top models have massive performance. What are we talking about here?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that bloated software like Electron apps and web frameworks necessitate increasingly high RAM and CPU specs just to maintain basic productivity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47541427&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; other than AI stuff, where does a non powerful computer limit you? Running Electron apps and browsing React-based websites, of course.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47541578&quot; title=&quot;For real. Once I&amp;#39;ve opened Spotify, Slack, Teams, and a browser about 10GB of RAM is in use. I barely have any RAM left over for actual work.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. This has led some power users to invest heavily in &amp;#34;forever&amp;#34; workstations to maintain local control and performance, viewing laptops as merely disposable clients for their own private servers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47541161&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t buy the central thesis of the article. We won&amp;#39;t be in a supply crunch forever. However, I do believe that we&amp;#39;re at an inflection point where DC hardware is diverging rapidly from consumer compute. Most consumers are using laptops and laptops are not keeping pace with where the frontier is in a singular compute node. Laptops are increasingly just clients for someone else&amp;#39;s compute that you rent, or buy a time slice with your eyeballs, much like smartphones pretty much always have been. I…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47541263&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I personally dropped $20k on a high end desktop - 768G of RAM, 96 cores, 96 GB Blackwell GPU - last October, before RAM prices spiked […] 768GB of RAM is insane… Meanwhile, I’ve been going back and forth for over a year about spending $10k on a MacBook Pro with 128GB. I can’t shake the feeling I’d never actually use that much, and that, long term, cloud compute is going to matter more than sinking money into a single, non-upgradable machine anyway.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47541496&quot; title=&quot;The general take here seems to be &amp;#39;everything eventually passes&amp;#39;. That isn&amp;#39;t always true. I wonder how many people have a primary computing device that they don&amp;#39;t even have full control over now (Apple phones, tablets...). Years ago the concept of spending over $1k on a computer that I didn&amp;#39;t even have the right to install my own software on was considered ridiculous by many people (myself included). Now many people primarily consume content on a device controlled almost entirely by the company…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sightlessscribbles.com/posts/the-paperwork-flood/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The &amp;#39;paperwork flood&amp;#39;: How I drowned a bureaucrat before dinner&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sightlessscribbles.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47542057&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;592 points · 478 comments · by robin_reala&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After a bureaucrat refused to accept digital files, a blind author used an internet fax service to send a 512-page medical history, forcing the office to process a massive physical &amp;#34;tsunami&amp;#34; of paperwork until they conceded and updated his disability benefits. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sightlessscribbles.com/posts/the-paperwork-flood/&quot; title=&quot;Title: How I Drowned a Bureaucrat before dinner., Sightless Scribbles    URL Source: https://sightlessscribbles.com/posts/the-paperwork-flood/    Published Time: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 21:50:07 GMT    Markdown Content:  # The &amp;#39;Paperwork Flood&amp;#39;: How I Drowned a Bureaucrat before dinner., Sightless Scribbles  [Skip to main content](https://sightlessscribbles.com/posts/the-paperwork-flood/#skip)  *   [RSS Feed](https://sightlessscribbles.com/feed.xml)  *   [Home](https://sightlessscribbles.com/)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided over whether overwhelming a low-level bureaucrat with a massive fax is a justified protest or a cruel act against a powerless individual &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47542604&quot; title=&quot;Karen woke up this morning in her run down, rented flat.  She briefly looks at the collections letter that showed up yesterday due to an unaffordable repair she had to pay for on her credit card.  Another letter from her ex-partner&amp;#39;s lawyer.  As she rushes out the door (she spilled coffee on her one nice sweater, her favorite) her mom flashes through her mind... &amp;#39;What about mum?&amp;#39;.  She arrives at the office.  It is an oppressive, sterile government office.  She tries to ignore the overwhelming…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47542732&quot; title=&quot;I agree wholeheartedly! This is exactly what i was thinking the entire time. Like, does this guy think this single woman is responsible for the kafka-esque trap they&amp;#39;re both in? Will the 0.5% uptick in toner cost for the year cause the administration to rethink their requirements? He&amp;#39;s just taken the immense weight and pain he holds for this process, undeservedly, and placed it upon another undeserving person, then laughed at her anguish. Yes, life is hard, but surely we can bear our troubles…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47542486&quot; title=&quot;Sounds like it&amp;#39;s not real but... It reads like an indictment of the government employee personally, rather than the rules and constraints that employee is forced to use. Probably fair to comment on the interaction, whether the person was rude, and so on.  But blaming them for not accepting email is kind of silly.  They are not empowered to do that kind of thing.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Some argue that making employees miserable applies necessary pressure on the system and that individuals must share responsibility for the organizations they serve &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543133&quot; title=&quot;I see this type of an argumentation very often and I strongly disagree. You&amp;#39;re removing all responsibility from an actor that is a part of a bigger thing. Imagine if you slapped someone on his hand for doing something wrong, and he or someone else argued what you did is wrong because it wasn&amp;#39;t that hand that has offended. I&amp;#39;m an antitheist but the Bible (gospels) put it well &amp;#39;The student is not above his master&amp;#39; [translation mine] - which means if you follow said master you have to share…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47545732&quot; title=&quot;“ It reads like an indictment of the government employee personally” As a government employee: it often is the employee personally. Not always, but surprisingly often. There is a type of mid-level bureaucrat who just can’t be bothered to make anyone else’s life easier, even if they can. It’s just easier not to, and over time that becomes its own form of malice. The tales I could tell you about security officers basically abusing their power in order to make their own lives as easy as possible,…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend that such actions are futile because large bureaucracies are indifferent to individual suffering and low-level staff lack the authority to change rules &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543963&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; From the perspective of the effect, if you make life of an employee miserable, the employee is more likely to resign or ask for a raise, this does apply some pressure. Not meaningful pressure, though, at least for large organizations. This is a variant of the flawed &amp;#39;vote with your wallet&amp;#39; argument: One wallet changes nothing. Even 100 or 1000 wallets change nothing. These huge businesses and huge governments are too big for one person at the bottom of the totem pole to make a difference.…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47542950&quot; title=&quot;This is exactly how it&amp;#39;s handled from my limited dealings with the machine.  Literally no one gives a shit if you make their job &amp;#39;harder.&amp;#39;  They have an endless treadmill of things to do.  Whether it&amp;#39;s your 500 page fax or 500 people with a 1 page fax is of no consequence to them.  They will work at the same pace either way. In fact their boss might like it because they can try to use it to argue for more headcount which is one of the ways to gain more prestige/power for the managers. I know…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543710&quot; title=&quot;No amount of beating low level employees will change whether they can accept pdf sent by email or not. And also, they are not supposed to use their intuitive ideas about what is and what is not dangerous use of software. When they do use their intuitive ideas, hacks happen. Karen here doing what she was told and accepting only formats that her organization security team told her to do is Karen doing the correct thing. We are on HN. People who are responsible for overreaching unreasonable…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, critics point out that the employee was likely following strict security or legal protocols, such as HIPAA, which the author of the stunt may not have understood &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543572&quot; title=&quot;Under HIPAA requirements emailing personal medical info is a massive no-no. Admittedly, this is for the patient&amp;#39;s protection, and of course being blind is not much of a secret... but it&amp;#39;s completely understandable that email would be strongly discouraged. Nobody wants to get in trouble for breaking the rules. Honestly, being able to accept a fax is great, although I would think any properly outfitted modern office that does accept fax would be able to route them straight to document storage…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543710&quot; title=&quot;No amount of beating low level employees will change whether they can accept pdf sent by email or not. And also, they are not supposed to use their intuitive ideas about what is and what is not dangerous use of software. When they do use their intuitive ideas, hacks happen. Karen here doing what she was told and accepting only formats that her organization security team told her to do is Karen doing the correct thing. We are on HN. People who are responsible for overreaching unreasonable…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548243&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;If you don&amp;#39;t opt out by Apr 24 GitHub will train on your private repos&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548243&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;731 points · 312 comments · by vmg12&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GitHub users must manually opt out by April 24 to prevent the platform from using their private repositories to train AI models. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548243&quot; title=&quot;This is where you can opt out. It&amp;amp;#x27;s absurd that they are automatically opting users into this.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;github.com&amp;amp;#x2F;settings&amp;amp;#x2F;copilot&amp;amp;#x2F;features&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GitHub representatives clarify that the policy change only applies to Copilot &amp;#34;interaction data&amp;#34; (inputs, outputs, and context) for Free and Pro users, rather than training on private repositories at rest &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548514&quot; title=&quot;No we won’t.  Details here https://github.blog/news-insights/company-news/updates-to-gi... For users of Free, Pro and Pro+ Copilot, if you don’t opt out then we will start collecting usage data of Copilot for use in model training. If you are a subscriber for Business or Pro we do not train on usage. The blog post covers more details but we do not train on private repo data at rest, just interaction data with Copilot.  If you don’t use Copilot this will not affect you. However you can still opt…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue this is a distinction without a difference, as the &amp;#34;context&amp;#34; sent to Copilot often includes significant portions of private code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548614&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s unnecessarily splitting hairs. &amp;gt; interaction data—specifically inputs, outputs, code snippets, and associated context [...] will be used to train and improve our AI models So using Copilot in a private repo, where lots of that repo will be used as context for Copilot, means GitHub will be using your private repo as training data when they were not before.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion reflects a broader cynicism that any unencrypted data will eventually be used for AI training due to market incentives, leading some users to suggest moving to enterprise tiers or alternative platforms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548376&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been saying this since 2023 &amp;gt; If your data is stored in a database that a company can freely read and access (i.e. not end-to-end encrypted), the company will eventually update their ToS so they can use your data for AI training — the incentives are too strong to resist https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37124188&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548405&quot; title=&quot;Edit: Okay, sounds like you guys are pissed to the point where it seems like the pro tip here is to stop using GitHub. Pro tip: sign up for the business/enterprise version when reasonable in price. I do this with Google Workspace. You can also do it with GitHub. (Google doesn’t train on Workspace, Github doesn’t train on business customers, etc)&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548546&quot; title=&quot;Yes I think you are right. Even a super ethical company can be taken over. There may be exceptions but it is more luck. I work for a SP500 that absolutely won&amp;#39;t dont this and locks down prod access so a rogue staff can&amp;#39;t do it. But if Larry or Zuck or Bezos buys them out, who knows.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/world/us/iran-linked-hackers-claim-breach-of-fbi-directors-personal-email-doj-official-2026-03-27/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Iran-linked hackers breach FBI director&amp;#39;s personal email&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (reuters.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543167&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;446 points · &lt;strong&gt;526 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by m-hodges&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Department of Justice confirmed that Iran-linked hackers breached the personal email account of FBI Director Kash Patel. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/world/us/iran-linked-hackers-claim-breach-of-fbi-directors-personal-email-doj-official-2026-03-27/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;ddosecrets.org&amp;amp;#x2F;article&amp;amp;#x2F;kash-patel-emails&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;ddosecrets.org&amp;amp;#x2F;article&amp;amp;#x2F;kash-patel-emails&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;arstechnica.com&amp;amp;#x2F;tech-policy&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;03&amp;amp;#x2F;doj-confirms-fbi-director-kash-patels-personal-email-was-hacked&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;arstechnica.com&amp;amp;#x2F;tech-policy&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;03&amp;amp;#x2F;doj-confirms-fbi...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The breach of the FBI director&amp;#39;s personal Gmail account has sparked debate over whether the incident is a &amp;#34;nothingburger&amp;#34; involving non-sensitive data or a significant failure of operational security &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543300&quot; title=&quot;Interesting, and not all that implausible. The real test: his personal email should be pretty uninteresting except for stuff like HIPAA, amazon purchases, communications with friends / family. (good for HUMINT) But other than that, there shouldn&amp;#39;t be anything in there which should make the news. It&amp;#39;ll be interesting to see whether or not that bears out. If they wanted to maintain access, they certainly wouldn&amp;#39;t celebrate it publicly, which is why I assume they want to release information. But,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47549507&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m no fan of this administration, at all, but this seems like a big fat nothingburger. They hacked a personal gmail account, not a government account, not government infra. Why is this not a failing of Google instead of the government? And surely the hackers would have eagerly released anything damning, but nothing damning seems to exist. What am i missing here?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users argue that the director&amp;#39;s failure to use Google’s enhanced security for high-profile individuals demonstrates incompetence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47546321&quot; title=&quot;GMail, like Apple, has specific enhanced security programs available for Politically Exposed Persons: https://landing.google.com/intl/en_in/advancedprotection/ The fact the Director of the FBI did not avail himself of this just reiterates how incompetent he is, in addition to being corrupt as heck.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, while others suggest that personal communications can still provide valuable human intelligence or leverage for blackmail &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543300&quot; title=&quot;Interesting, and not all that implausible. The real test: his personal email should be pretty uninteresting except for stuff like HIPAA, amazon purchases, communications with friends / family. (good for HUMINT) But other than that, there shouldn&amp;#39;t be anything in there which should make the news. It&amp;#39;ll be interesting to see whether or not that bears out. If they wanted to maintain access, they certainly wouldn&amp;#39;t celebrate it publicly, which is why I assume they want to release information. But,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543638&quot; title=&quot;I think this is actually the opposite of the correct conclusion—just look how influential Patreus cheating on his wife was ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petraeus_scandal ). I seriously doubt that Kash Patel doesn&amp;#39;t have a bunch of skeletons to dust off and show the world; the man is a weirdo (much like the rest of the administration). EDIT: I actually misread the comment; I think we&amp;#39;re likely in agreement. My bad.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also reflects a broader concern that the current administration is replacing technical expertise with &amp;#34;crackpots and fools&amp;#34; who lack basic security awareness &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47549199&quot; title=&quot;Hegseth - Signal app Noem - habeas corpus definition she gave at the Congress hearing Kennedy Jr - vaccines and the rest of his view on medicine Now Patel&amp;#39;s unhackable FBI. I think the world has changed, and i really need to update my expectations of what is new normal. It is like in tech when paradigm shift happens, and you&amp;#39;re either go with the new paradigm or get irrelevant.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47549349&quot; title=&quot;A great many experts in the military, medicine, disaster relief, and cybersecurity { the list goes on } were fired. It&amp;#39;s almost as if the nation were being weakened on purpose. Don&amp;#39;t get mad, get Vlad. Or just prepare for the long-desired Rapture.[0] and which politicians seem to be working very hard to being about (the Apocalypse part, anyway) [0] https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/29/us/iran-israel-evangelicals-p... &amp;gt; Prophecy, not politics, may also shape America’s clash with Iran So, is prophecy…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47549227&quot; title=&quot;“Totalitarianism in power invariably replaces all first-rate talents, regardless of their sympathies, with those crackpots and fools whose lack of intelligence and creativity is still the best guarantee of their loyalty.” ~Hannah Arendt&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lr0.org/blog/p/macos/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Make macOS consistently bad unironically&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lr0.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47547009&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;532 points · 360 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer has shared a code-based workaround for macOS 26 to address inconsistent window corner radii by forcing all third-party applications to adopt the same &amp;#34;excessively rounded&amp;#34; aesthetic used by Apple’s system apps. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lr0.org/blog/p/macos/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Make MacOS 26 consistently bad (unironically)    URL Source: https://lr0.org/blog/p/macos/    Published Time: Sat, 28 Mar 2026 04:33:44 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Make MacOS 26 consistently bad (unironically) | La Vita Nouva    [vita…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The macOS user interface is fundamentally designed around overlapping, non-maximized windows, a philosophy that long-time users have adapted to by keeping multiple windows visible for quick switching &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47547407&quot; title=&quot;Between the rounded corners that don&amp;#39;t reach the edges of the viewport, and the behavior when opening a new app for the first time, it feels like Mac&amp;#39;s UI is optimized around the assumption most users won&amp;#39;t expand windows to fill the whole screen, but rather leave them half-sized somewhere in the middle. Does anyone actually do this? Especially for heavy-duty applications like my web browser and IDE, this has always felt like a bizarre assumption to me.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548075&quot; title=&quot;macOS only recently got an option to make windows fill the screen. For most of history what most people would assume is a maximize button (the green one) was actually a zoom button. It sized the window to what the OS thought was appropriate for the content (to the best of my knowledge and experience with it). Apple then made things go full screen, but in a special full screen mode, so macOS worked more like the iPad. By the time they added a way to maximize windows in the way Windows does, the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47547493&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve seen half a dozen Mac users and none of them maximized the window very often. They usually had a mishmash of like 12 windows open and randomly all over the screen. Then they used the Alt-Tab to get between them. Basically wherever it opened is where it stayed.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some find this behavior &amp;#34;bizarre&amp;#34; or a &amp;#34;fundamental flaw&amp;#34; compared to the snapping and maximization features of Windows and Linux, others argue that maximizing is unnecessary on modern high-resolution or ultrawide monitors where full-screen apps create excessive whitespace &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47547521&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; it feels like Mac&amp;#39;s UI is optimized around the assumption most users won&amp;#39;t expand windows to fill the whole screen, but rather leave them half-sized somewhere in the middle IMO, this has been their assumption for years, and it actually turned me off when I tried getting used to Mac circa 2006-2007. Coming from Windows at the time, I just couldn&amp;#39;t get over a weird anxiety that my application window wasn&amp;#39;t maximized, because it didn&amp;#39;t look like it completely snapped into the screen corners.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47547468&quot; title=&quot;Probably not the norm, but I use a large 4K monitor and no scaling. I haven’t maximized a window in years.  They look ridiculous like that.  Especially web pages with their max width set so the content is 1/4 the screen and 3/4 whitespace.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47547506&quot; title=&quot;I disagree as it shows a fundamental flaw in terms of separation of concerns that&amp;#39;s probably manifest throughout the operating system. Or to stay it another way, if we see shit like this then we know the whole thing is a hack.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47547873&quot; title=&quot;I usually use Linux and Windows (pretty much split 50/50) and tbh this is why I never could switch to Mac full time even though I&amp;#39;ve have had and still have several Macs at home. The full screen beahavior is weird. Is the dock should overlay every single window all the time? If not then why is the dock not hidden by default? If yes then full screen is actually &amp;#39;maximum size app window without overlaying the dock&amp;#39;? What&amp;#39;s even the point of the dock actually? The other one is the open window =/=…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Disagreements persist over whether these UI quirks are minor &amp;#34;bike-shedding&amp;#34; topics or evidence of a &amp;#34;hacky&amp;#34; OS architecture, particularly regarding the inconsistent behavior of the green &amp;#34;zoom&amp;#34; button and the Dock &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47547476&quot; title=&quot;I must say that all this fuzz about the corners actually reflects rather well on macos. If the biggest flaw of a OS is the border radius of its windows, you&amp;#39;ve got yourself a pretty decent OS! It&amp;#39;s not gonna make me leave my darling Linux, ofc, but i think this whole debacle can only be interpreted as praise. On second thought, it might also be considered a mediation on people&amp;#39;s tendency to bike-shed.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548075&quot; title=&quot;macOS only recently got an option to make windows fill the screen. For most of history what most people would assume is a maximize button (the green one) was actually a zoom button. It sized the window to what the OS thought was appropriate for the content (to the best of my knowledge and experience with it). Apple then made things go full screen, but in a special full screen mode, so macOS worked more like the iPad. By the time they added a way to maximize windows in the way Windows does, the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47547873&quot; title=&quot;I usually use Linux and Windows (pretty much split 50/50) and tbh this is why I never could switch to Mac full time even though I&amp;#39;ve have had and still have several Macs at home. The full screen beahavior is weird. Is the dock should overlay every single window all the time? If not then why is the dock not hidden by default? If yes then full screen is actually &amp;#39;maximum size app window without overlaying the dock&amp;#39;? What&amp;#39;s even the point of the dock actually? The other one is the open window =/=…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548521&quot; title=&quot;You can double click the grab handle area of a window (which is less obvious than ever in Tahoe) and it&amp;#39;ll fill the window to the display. Except Safari, which just fills out the window&amp;#39;s height vertically. Kinda weird to make an exception like that but I don&amp;#39;t hate it, because I generally use Safari for reading, and shrinking the browser&amp;#39;s width forces lines of text to not get too long if the website&amp;#39;s styling isn&amp;#39;t setting that manually.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.dailydoseofds.com/p/anatomy-of-the-claude-folder&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Anatomy of the .claude/ folder&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.dailydoseofds.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543139&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;612 points · 261 comments · by freedomben&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This guide explains how to configure the `.claude` folder to customize Claude Code&amp;#39;s behavior through project-specific instructions in `CLAUDE.md`, automated &amp;#34;skills,&amp;#34; custom slash commands, and permission settings in `settings.json`. It also details how to use global configurations and subagents to streamline complex development workflows. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.dailydoseofds.com/p/anatomy-of-the-claude-folder&quot; title=&quot;Title: Anatomy of the .claude/ Folder    URL Source: https://blog.dailydoseofds.com/p/anatomy-of-the-claude-folder    Published Time: 2026-03-23T19:36:59+00:00    Markdown Content:  Most teams have adopted AI in some form, but the gap between “using AI” and “getting measurable ROI from AI” is larger than people realize.    **[Postman](https://fandf.co/3NR30kc)** released a cost savings analysis that looks at six common API development workflows and benchmarks the actual time and cost difference when AI…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A primary debate in the thread centers on whether complex agentic configurations are necessary, with many arguing that a &amp;#34;fresh&amp;#34; setup and simple plan-based execution often outperform over-engineered toolkits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543929&quot; title=&quot;I’m seeing this more and more, where people build this artificial wall you supposedly need to climb to try agentic coding. That’s not the right way to start at all. You should start with a fresh .claude, empty AGENTS.md, zero skills and MCP and learn to operate the thing first.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47546767&quot; title=&quot;Building your AI agent &amp;#39;toolkit&amp;#39; is becoming the equivalent of the perfect &amp;#39;productivity&amp;#39; setup where you spend your time reading blog posts, watching YouTube videos telling you how to be productive and creating habits and rituals...only to  be overtaken by a person with a simple paper list of tasks that they work through. Plain Claude, ask it to write a plan, review plan, then tell it to execute still works the best in my experience.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47546296&quot; title=&quot;Seriously, just use plan mode first and you get like 90% of the way there, with CC launching subagents that will generally do the right thing anyway. IMHO most of this “customize your config to be more productive” stuff will go away within a year, obsoleted by improved models and harnesses. Just like how all the lessons for how to use LLMs in code from 1-2 years ago are already long forgotten.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find custom skills essential for navigating massive, interconnected codebases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548097&quot; title=&quot;its not though if you&amp;#39;re working in a massive codebase or on a distributed system that has many interconnected parts. skills that teach the agent how to pipe data, build requests, trace them through a system and datasources, then update code based on those results are a step function improvement in development. ai has fundamentally changed how productive i am working on a 10m line codebase, and i&amp;#39;d guess less than 5% of that is due to code gen thats intended to go to prod. Nearly all of it is…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others warn that importing external skills introduces security risks and nondeterminism, suggesting users should only use tools they created themselves &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47545794&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d also go even further and say that you likely should never install ANY skill that you didn&amp;#39;t create yourself (i mean, guided claude to create it for you works too), or &amp;#39;forked&amp;#39; an existing one and pulled only what you need. Everyone&amp;#39;s workflow is different and nobody knows which workflow is the right one. If you turn your harness into a junk drawer of random skills that get auto updated, you introduce yet another layer of nondeterminism into it, and also blow up your context window. The only…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a call for standardization across AI providers to allow for easier switching between tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47544018&quot; title=&quot;I wish all model providers would converge on a standard set of files, so I could switch easily from Claude to Codex to Cursor to Opencode depending on the situation&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, alongside concerns about how to manage shared agentic configurations within development teams &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47544027&quot; title=&quot;Yes, but as soon as you start checking in and sharing access to a project with other developers these things become shared. Working out how to work on code on your own with agentic support is one thing. Working out how to work on it as a team where each developer is employing agentic tools is a whole different ballgame.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/news/2026/mar/26/ai-got-the-blame-for-the-iran-school-bombing-the-truth-is-far-more-worrying&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI got the blame for the Iran school bombing. The truth is more worrying&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theguardian.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47544980&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;405 points · 377 comments · by cptroot&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A 2026 U.S. airstrike on an Iranian school that killed approximately 180 people was wrongly blamed on AI chatbots like Claude, masking a lethal failure in Palantir’s &amp;#34;Maven&amp;#34; targeting system and outdated databases that prioritized high-speed automated &amp;#34;kill chains&amp;#34; over human verification and deliberation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/news/2026/mar/26/ai-got-the-blame-for-the-iran-school-bombing-the-truth-is-far-more-worrying&quot; title=&quot;Title: AI got the blame for the Iran school bombing. The truth is far more worrying    URL Source: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2026/mar/26/ai-got-the-blame-for-the-iran-school-bombing-the-truth-is-far-more-worrying    Published Time: 2026-03-26T05:00:28.000Z    Markdown Content:  O n the first morning of Operation Epic Fury, 28 February 2026, American forces struck the Shajareh Tayyebeh primary school in Minab, in southern [Iran](https://www.theguardian.com/world/iran), hitting the building at…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether the use of the &amp;#34;Maven&amp;#34; AI system in a non-combat &amp;#34;sneak attack&amp;#34; led to a catastrophic failure of human oversight, with some arguing that the speed of the targeting pipeline bypassed necessary double-checks for a building that was clearly a school &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47545959&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Three clicks convert a data point on the map into a formal detection and move it into a targeting pipeline. These targets then move through columns representing different decision-making processes and rules of engagement. The system recommends how to strike each target – which aircraft, drone or missile to use, which weapon to pair with it – what the military calls a “course of action”. The officer selects from the ranked options, and the system, depending on who is using it, either sends the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47546244&quot; title=&quot;I couldn&amp;#39;t find a web site for the school when I searched for one and I also noticed that while schools are generally marked on Google Maps in Iran this school was not. Both are IMO not really relevant or reliable sources of targeting data anyways. I found very little evidence searching online for the school but I did find something that looked like a blog about a school trip. Again though the Internet is not a reliable source of data for targeting - should be obvious. The main way targets…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters defend the strike as a low-probability &amp;#34;error rate&amp;#34; in a complex operation where the building physically resembled a military compound &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47546036&quot; title=&quot;I recommend looking closely at the New York Times analysis. There were factors that might have mitigated this as a strike target, but it also really did look like a part of the compound (and it originally was!). Yes, with hindsight, we can definitively know, and with sufficient time each target could probably have been positively ID&amp;#39;d, but there was precisely one mis-strike in 1000s of sorties, so this already is a low error rate. TFA discusses 50 specific strikes all of which missed via…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47546842&quot; title=&quot;I will try to respond to all these independent threads, but we can&amp;#39;t continue all of them at once. &amp;gt; . “These aren’t just nameless, faceless targets,” he said later. “This is a place where people are going to feel ramifications for a long time.” The targeting cycle had been fast enough to hit 50 buildings and too fast to discover it was hitting the wrong ones. &amp;gt; The air force’s own targeting guide, in effect during the Iraq war, said this was never supposed to happen. Published in 1998, it…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others reject this framing as &amp;#34;grotesque,&amp;#34; arguing that no &amp;#34;error rate&amp;#34; justifies the death of children in a war of choice &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47546325&quot; title=&quot;How many American schoolchildren have Iran killed in the last 25 years? How many Iranian schoolchildren have America killed? Where&amp;#39;s your moral justification for this war of choice if &amp;#39;oops, 137 dead kids is a normal expected outcome&amp;#39;?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47546445&quot; title=&quot;So I read the entire TFA, where do you see “quotes [from] those in the know who believe this should have been eliminated as a target”? I saw no such quotes about the school in TFA. Maybe I missed it. &amp;gt; there was precisely one mis-strike in 1000s of sorties How did you verify this? Because I’ll remind you, the U.S. administration denied responsibility for some time before owning up to this due to public pressure. Absent public pressure, I guess we would’ve had zero mis-strikes. &amp;gt; so this already…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47546772&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Accidentally killing a bunch of kids would likely be worth it, morally speaking, if it led to the destruction of the Iranian regime. It most absolutely is not and I struggle to believe you can build a valid argument that links bombing school children as necessary for the fall of Iran’s government. How you win a war, especially one as lopsided as this invasion is, is as important as winning. I cannot so easily sleep at night knowing we are committing horrific atrocities during an invasion we…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, some participants question the fundamental veracity of the report, citing the heavy influence of information warfare and unverified claims from the Iranian government &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47545913&quot; title=&quot;You can&amp;#39;t have a serious discussion of this bombing without addressing the information warfare component. To this day we don&amp;#39;t know what actually happened . Between the general public and the facts, there are many middlemen, all with their own distorting factor: the IRGC; the US government; western press outlets such as the Guardian; and the people quoted by the press. IRGC is making claims that no other party can verify first-hand. Everything from the number of explosions, the extent of the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, while others maintain that the entire operation was an illegal act of aggression regardless of the specific target [8&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.euronews.com/2026/03/26/suddenly-energy-independence-feels-practical-europeans-are-building-mini-solar-farms-at-ho&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;‘Energy independence feels practical’: Europeans building mini solar farms&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (euronews.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47540383&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;350 points · 343 comments · by vrganj&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Europeans are increasingly adopting plug-in solar panels to achieve energy independence and lower costs during a fossil fuel crisis sparked by the Iran war. These small, affordable systems allow apartment dwellers and homeowners to generate and store power, typically recouping their investment within two to six years. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.euronews.com/2026/03/26/suddenly-energy-independence-feels-practical-europeans-are-building-mini-solar-farms-at-ho&quot; title=&quot;What is plug-in solar and can it save you money?    Many consumers want to know how long it will take them to make back the upfront costs of solar.    * [Go to navigation](#enw-navigation-bar)  * [Go to main content](#enw-main-content)  * [Go to search](#search-autocomplete)  * [Go to footer](#enw-site-footer)    [ ]    English    * [English](https://www.euronews.com/2026/03/26/suddenly-energy-independence-feels-practical-europeans-are-building-mini-solar-farms-at-ho)  * [Français](https://fr.euronews.com)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters emphasize that distributed solar production and balcony-mounted systems are essential for future energy resiliency and personal &amp;#34;relief&amp;#34; from volatile energy markets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47540586&quot; title=&quot;Distributed energy production / storage is the key for resiliency in the future. Every solar farm doesn&amp;#39;t need to be China Size - it doesn&amp;#39;t even need to be a &amp;#39;farm&amp;#39;, just put them on roofs. And don&amp;#39;t let perfect be the enemy of good. Yes there are times when solar doesn&amp;#39;t produce energy, but there are also times where it OVERproduces.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47540692&quot; title=&quot;to answer the first question in the article &amp;#39;Many consumers want to know how long it will take them to make back the upfront costs of solar&amp;#39; my answer is that the payback is imediate, right from the first moment watching as energy is generated out of thin air, and the sudden relief from getting off the energy angst missery-go-round, and the sheer borring inertness of solar pv as it does the thing with zero detectable effort, is gratifying and relaxing in a way that money never gives. I will add…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47546658&quot; title=&quot;Several recent HN posts about &amp;#39;time&amp;#39; and these correlate superbly in relation to the now obvious, to nearly all, global energy issues. Those proactive in a reactive world are often mocked and laughed at until as such passage of time is achieved for those only reactive to learn of the proactive&amp;#39;s hindsight choices. For those in the United States aware of the &amp;#39;behind the scenes&amp;#39; energy grid issues this insight reflects that prices will not be dropping for those electrons we all so depressively…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that overproduction creates economic inefficiencies and high backup costs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47540942&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; And don&amp;#39;t let perfect be the enemy of good. Yes there are times when solar doesn&amp;#39;t produce energy, but there are also times where it OVERproduces. When solar OVERproduces you have to literally pay someone to consume that energy, most probably wind farms, which could be producing energy instead. So you pay actually twice. When the solar underproduces, you need to bring in alternative sources, but those now have to cover all their fixed costs and generate return on investment over this limited…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest utilizing excess energy for batteries or electrolysis &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47541147&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;If you find dollar bills on the ground you need to pay someone to collect it as litter&amp;#39; Charge batteries, do electrolysis, or a multitude of other uses (I know some companies do that already)&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant debate exists regarding the safety of &amp;#34;plug-in&amp;#34; solar kits, with concerns raised about frequency syncing and circuit protection, though some dismiss these technical warnings as protectionism by industry bodies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47544464&quot; title=&quot;British industry and standards bodies think this is an unsafe plan. Of course they would because it&amp;#39;s work being taken away from them but it would be allowing people to plug generators into ring finals with unidirectional breakers. It&amp;#39;s not even guaranteed that the circuit is protected by anything newer than fuse wire or an MCB. No guaranteed earth leakage detection. No guaranteed surge protection. Relying on the cheapest inverters to sync frequency accurately. And I have more faith in German…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47546988&quot; title=&quot;“Unidirectional breakers” aren’t a thing for AC circuits.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://micahkepe.com/blog/jsongrep/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A Faster Alternative to Jq&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (micahkepe.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47539825&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;390 points · 252 comments · by pistolario&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`jsongrep` is a new Rust-based search tool that outperforms `jq` and other JSON query engines by compiling path expressions into deterministic finite automata (DFA) for single-pass, zero-copy traversal without backtracking or recursion. &lt;a href=&quot;https://micahkepe.com/blog/jsongrep/&quot; title=&quot;Title: jsongrep is faster than {jq, jmespath, jsonpath-rust, jql}    URL Source: https://micahkepe.com/blog/jsongrep/    Markdown Content:  This article is both an introduction to a tool I have been working on called [`jsongrep`](https://github.com/micahkepe/jsongrep), as well as a technical explanation of the internal search engine it uses. I also discuss the benchmarking strategy used to compare the performance of `jsongrep` against other JSON path-like query tools and implementations.    In this…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While many users find `jq`&amp;#39;s syntax arcane and difficult to remember &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47542562&quot; title=&quot;Jq&amp;#39;s syntax is so arcane I can never remember it and always need to look up how to get a value from simple JSON.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47542740&quot; title=&quot;I also genuinely hate using jq. It is one of the only things that I rely heavily on AI.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47544235&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not GP, I use jq all the time, but I each time I use it I feel like I&amp;#39;m still a beginner because I don&amp;#39;t get where I want to go on the first several attempts. Great tool, but IMO it is more intuitive to JSON people that want a CLI tool than CLI people that want a JSON tool. In other words, I have my own preconceptions about how piping should work on the whole thing, not iterating, and it always trips me up. Here&amp;#39;s an example of my white whale, converting JSON arrays to TSV. cat input.json |…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue its logic is intuitive for those accustomed to shell pipelines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543413&quot; title=&quot;That’s interesting! Can you say a little more? I find jq’s syntax and semantics to be simple and intuitive. It’s mostly dots, pipes, and brackets. It’s a lot like writing shell pipelines imo. And I tend to use it in the same way. Lots of one-time use invocations, so I spend more time writing jq filters than I spend reading them. I suspect my use cases are less complex than yours. Or maybe jq just fits the way I think for some reason. I dream of a world in which all CLI tools produce and consume…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant debate exists regarding the necessity of a &amp;#34;faster&amp;#34; alternative; some view micro-optimizations as performative for daily tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47540532&quot; title=&quot;I appreciate performance as much as the next person; but I see this endless battle to measure things in ns/us/ms as performative. Sure there are 0.000001% edge cases where that MIGHT be the next big bottleneck. I see the same thing repeated in various front end tooling too. They all claim to be _much_ faster than their counterpart. 9/10 whatever tooling you are using now will be perfectly fine. Example; I use grep a lot in an ad hoc manner on really large files I switch to rg. But that is only…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47540030&quot; title=&quot;I wonder so often about many new CLI tools whose primary selling point is their speed over other tools. Yet I personally have not encountered any case where a tool like jq feels incredibly slow, and I would feel the urge to find something else.  What do people do all day that existing tools are no longer enough? Or is it that kind of &amp;#39;my new terminal opens 107ms faster now, and I don&amp;#39;t notice it, but I simply feel better because I know&amp;#39;?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, while others highlight that high-performance tools are essential for processing terabyte-scale data where `jq` becomes a bottleneck &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47541107&quot; title=&quot;Whenever you have this kind of impressions on some development, here are my 2 cents: just think &amp;#39;I&amp;#39;m not the target audience&amp;#39;. And that&amp;#39;s fine. The difference between 2ms and 0.2ms might sound unneeded, or even silly to you. But somebody, somewhere, is doing stream processing of TB-sized JSON objects, and they will care. These news are for them.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47540075&quot; title=&quot;I process TB-size ndjson files. I want to use jq to do some simple transformations between stages of the processing pipeline (e.g. rename a field), but it so slow that I write a single-use node or rust script instead.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users have even turned to AI to generate complex filters because the tool&amp;#39;s learning curve remains steep for non-experts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47542740&quot; title=&quot;I also genuinely hate using jq. It is one of the only things that I rely heavily on AI.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543050&quot; title=&quot;At that point why don&amp;#39;t we ask the AI directly to filter through our data? The AI query language is much more powerful.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://soranews24.com/2026/03/27/japan-now-has-a-special-desk-for-people-who-work-at-home-with-a-pet-catphotos/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Desk for people who work at home with a cat&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (soranews24.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543943&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;456 points · 162 comments · by zdw&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Japanese furniture company Bibilab has released the Neko House Desk, a $160 workspace featuring built-in cat tunnels, a two-tier lounging area, and a &amp;#34;surprise hole&amp;#34; to help remote workers coexist harmoniously with their pets. &lt;a href=&quot;https://soranews24.com/2026/03/27/japan-now-has-a-special-desk-for-people-who-work-at-home-with-a-pet-catphotos/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Japan now has a special desk for people who work at home with a pet cat[Photos]    URL Source: https://soranews24.com/2026/03/27/japan-now-has-a-special-desk-for-people-who-work-at-home-with-a-pet-catphotos/    Published Time: 2026-03-27T05:00:14+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Japan now has a special desk for people who work at home with a pet cat[Photos] | SoraNews24 -Japan News-    # [SoraNews24 -Japan News-](https://soranews24.com/)    Bringing you yesterday&amp;#39;s news from Japan and Asia,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely agree that the desk&amp;#39;s design is flawed because cats prioritize human attention over designated furniture, often choosing to sit on keyboards or work materials specifically because their owners care about them &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47544782&quot; title=&quot;I can foresee a design flaw, which is that the cat will ignore all the specially designated areas and sit on your keyboard instead.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47545547&quot; title=&quot;Past experience with cat-wrangling over the years have taught me one thing (amongst many): It doesn&amp;#39;t matter what the object is, if human cares about it, cat will use said object as a cat would, in order to communicate with human. Communications from cat tend to be along the lines of: I&amp;#39;m hungry, or in most cases, I want attention (play/stimulation). Past objects observed: Keyboards, houseplants, pens &amp;amp; pencils, kitchen area counter and anything on it, pet ants, rock and fossil collection.. the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47545836&quot; title=&quot;Exactly. Contrary to popular belief cats don&amp;#39;t sit there because a laptop keyboard is warm. They also sit on external keyboards or even in front of a tablet without a keyboard (blocking the view to the screen). They just want your attention.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Many users suggest that makeshift solutions, such as cardboard boxes or rotated &amp;#34;unique spots,&amp;#34; are more effective than expensive, purpose-built cat furniture &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47545547&quot; title=&quot;Past experience with cat-wrangling over the years have taught me one thing (amongst many): It doesn&amp;#39;t matter what the object is, if human cares about it, cat will use said object as a cat would, in order to communicate with human. Communications from cat tend to be along the lines of: I&amp;#39;m hungry, or in most cases, I want attention (play/stimulation). Past objects observed: Keyboards, houseplants, pens &amp;amp; pencils, kitchen area counter and anything on it, pet ants, rock and fossil collection.. the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47544417&quot; title=&quot;The problem is that cats can flawlessly detect when something was made for them to use, and then will not deign to use it. Meanwhile, the cardboard box you have forgotten to take to the recycling for three weeks will become their palace.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47546410&quot; title=&quot;Yeah after investing in countless cat toys from the pet store, I found out that my cat&amp;#39;s favorites are (in no particular order): - McDonald&amp;#39;s paper straw - Bird feather from outside - Empty toilet paper roll - Shoelace - Strap of Velcro - Bottle cap&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate the nature of the human-cat relationship &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47545876&quot; title=&quot;I will never understand the accomodations people make for a pet which gives you so little in return. If most owners were 100% honest and in private I reckon at least 50% would admit their cat is an asshole. I mean they don&amp;#39;t even smile like a dog. They look miserable most of the time! It&amp;#39;s like an abusive relationship where nothing you do will please them LOL Yes, I&amp;#39;m a dog person ;) There must be something to the toxoplasmosis theory&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47546582&quot; title=&quot;They are incredibly communicative animals. Their problem seems to be that I am a very stupid creature that often does the wrong thing, like not feeding them every time they’re hungry, sitting at a desk instead of playing with them, carrying them out of the room when they were clearly trying to get on the kitchen counter, and so on.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others note that the desk fails to meet legal ergonomic standards for height adjustability in certain regions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47544942&quot; title=&quot;Also illegal here in Denmark, if you use it while working from home. Desks must be height adjustable. Your employer is responsible for providing ergonomically correct office equipment. Basically any influencer and YouTuber who&amp;#39;s showing &amp;#39;clever&amp;#39; desk hacks or builds fails because their creations aren&amp;#39;t height adjustable. And my cat sleeps behind the laptop anyway.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://code.claude.com/docs/en/web-scheduled-tasks&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Schedule tasks on the web&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (code.claude.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47539188&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;297 points · 243 comments · by iBelieve&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Claude Code now allows users to automate recurring workflows, such as pull request reviews and dependency audits, by scheduling tasks to run autonomously on Anthropic-managed cloud infrastructure. &lt;a href=&quot;https://code.claude.com/docs/en/web-scheduled-tasks&quot; title=&quot;Title: Schedule tasks on the web - Claude Code Docs    URL Source: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/web-scheduled-tasks    Markdown Content:  # Schedule tasks on the web - Claude Code Docs    [Skip to main content](https://code.claude.com/docs/en/web-scheduled-tasks#content-area)    [Claude Code Docs home page![Image 1: light logo](https://mintcdn.com/claude-code/c5r9_6tjPMzFdDDT/logo/light.svg?fit=max&amp;amp;auto=format&amp;amp;n=c5r9_6tjPMzFdDDT&amp;amp;q=85&amp;amp;s=78fd01ff4f4340295a4f66e2ea54903c)![Image 2: dark…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether AI agents will soon automate the entire software development lifecycle, from ticket creation to deployment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47539295&quot; title=&quot;I feel like we are just inching closer and closer to a world where rapid iteration of software will be by default. Like for example a trusted user makes feedback -&amp;gt; feedback gets curated into a ticket by an AI agent, then turned into a PR by an Agent, then reviewed by an Agent, before being deployed by an Agent. We are maybe one or two steps from the flywheel being completed. Or maybe we are already there.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47541816&quot; title=&quot;I think this sounds like a true yet short sighted take. Keep in mind these features are immature but they exist to obtain a flywheel and corner the market. I don’t know why but people seem to consistently miss two points and their implications - performance is continuing to increase incredibly quickly, even if you rightfully don’t trust a particular evaluation. Scaling laws like chinchilla and RL scaling laws (both training and test time) - coding is a verifiable domain The second one is most…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that coding is a verifiable domain governed by predictable scaling laws that will eventually reach superhuman performance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47541816&quot; title=&quot;I think this sounds like a true yet short sighted take. Keep in mind these features are immature but they exist to obtain a flywheel and corner the market. I don’t know why but people seem to consistently miss two points and their implications - performance is continuing to increase incredibly quickly, even if you rightfully don’t trust a particular evaluation. Scaling laws like chinchilla and RL scaling laws (both training and test time) - coding is a verifiable domain The second one is most…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47541983&quot; title=&quot;because it has business context and better reasoning, and can ask humans for clarification and take direction. You don&amp;#39;t need to benchmark this, although it&amp;#39;s important. We have clear scaling laws on true statistical performance that is monotonically related to any notion of what performance means. I do benchmarks for a living and can attest: benchmarks are bad, but it doesn&amp;#39;t matter for the point I&amp;#39;m trying to make.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others report that current models produce unmaintainable &amp;#34;hell&amp;#34; characterized by high mistake rates, performance issues, and a lack of long-term architectural vision &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47541282&quot; title=&quot;I just don’t see it coming. I was full on that camp 3 months ago, but I just realize every step makes more mistakes. It leads into a deadlock and when no human has the mental model anymore. Don’t you guys have hard business problems where AI just cant solve it or just very slowly and it’s presenting you 17 ideas till it found the right one. I’m using the most expensive models. I think the nature of AI might block that progress and I think some companies woke up and other will wake up later. The…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47539453&quot; title=&quot;What kind of software are people building where AI can just one shot tickets? Opus 4.6 and GPT 5.4 regularly fail when dealing with complicated issues for me.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47541904&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; - coding is a verifiable domain You&amp;#39;re missing the point though. &amp;#39;1 + 1&amp;#39; vs &amp;#39;one.add(1)&amp;#39; might both be &amp;#39;passable&amp;#39; and correct, but it&amp;#39;s missing the forest for the trees, how do you know which one is &amp;#39;long-term the right choice, given what we know?&amp;#39;, which is the engineering part of building software, and less about &amp;#39;coding&amp;#39; which tends to be the easy part. How do you evaluate, score and/or benchmark something like that? Currently, I don&amp;#39;t think we have any methodologies for this, probably…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics emphasize that while AI can assist with syntax, it struggles with complex business logic and the subjective engineering choices required for sustainable software &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47541282&quot; title=&quot;I just don’t see it coming. I was full on that camp 3 months ago, but I just realize every step makes more mistakes. It leads into a deadlock and when no human has the mental model anymore. Don’t you guys have hard business problems where AI just cant solve it or just very slowly and it’s presenting you 17 ideas till it found the right one. I’m using the most expensive models. I think the nature of AI might block that progress and I think some companies woke up and other will wake up later. The…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47541904&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; - coding is a verifiable domain You&amp;#39;re missing the point though. &amp;#39;1 + 1&amp;#39; vs &amp;#39;one.add(1)&amp;#39; might both be &amp;#39;passable&amp;#39; and correct, but it&amp;#39;s missing the forest for the trees, how do you know which one is &amp;#39;long-term the right choice, given what we know?&amp;#39;, which is the engineering part of building software, and less about &amp;#39;coding&amp;#39; which tends to be the easy part. How do you evaluate, score and/or benchmark something like that? Currently, I don&amp;#39;t think we have any methodologies for this, probably…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47539474&quot; title=&quot;i dont see anyone sane trusting ai to this degree any time soon, outside of web dev. the chances of this strategy failing are still well above acceptable margins for most software, and in safety critical instances it will be decades before standards allow for such adoption. anyway we are paying pennies on the dollar for compute at the moment - as soon as the gravy train stops rolling, all this intelligence will be out of access for most humans. unless some more efficient generalizable…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c77m4zx6zvmo&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Slovenia becomes first EU country to introduce fuel rationing&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548087&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;193 points · &lt;strong&gt;338 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by measurablefunc&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Slovenia has introduced fuel rationing, limiting private motorists to 50 litres per day, to address supply disruptions and &amp;#34;fuel tourism&amp;#34; caused by regional conflict and price disparities with neighboring countries. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c77m4zx6zvmo&quot; title=&quot;Slovenia becomes first EU state to introduce fuel rationing    Until further notice, motorists in Slovenia will be restricted to a maximum purchase of 50 litres of fuel per day.    [Skip to content](#main-content)    [British Broadcasting Corporation](/)    * [Home](/)  * [News](/news)  * [Sport](/sport)  * [Business](/business)  * [Technology](/technology)  * [Health](/health)  * [Culture](/culture)  * [Arts](/arts)  * [Travel](/travel)  * [Earth](/future-planet)  * [Audio](/audio)  * [Video](/video)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fuel rationing in Slovenia is largely attributed to logistics failures caused by &amp;#34;fuel tourism,&amp;#34; where foreigners and farmers attempted to stockpile cheaper subsidized gas &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548604&quot; title=&quot;The local farmers came with 1000l+ tanks for diesel, foreigners with multiple gas cans, etc.,  and the local logistics couldn&amp;#39;t handle the pressure.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548699&quot; title=&quot;Foreigners were coming to Slovenia just to buy gas? In such quantities that it strained infrastructure? That definitely sounds like something that happened. As if &amp;#39;multiple gas cans&amp;#39; wouldn&amp;#39;t still be well under the 50 liter/day limit.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548708&quot; title=&quot;So... why is fuel 25% cheaper in Slovenia than in the neighbouring country while Solvenia is simultaneously having issues with running out of fuel? Seems like the obvious solution is to raise prices so people stop driving to your country (wasting fuel, ironically) to take your cheap fuel instead of just paying for the fuel in their own country. More than that it&amp;#39;s a solution the free market would actually find on its own...&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters disagree on the long-term solution: some argue that aggressive investment in renewables would have prevented this crisis by decoupling energy from volatile oil markets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548569&quot; title=&quot;Hope that gets Europe to invest in renewables and leave oil behind.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548981&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Petro is pretty much upstream of everything: plastics, fertilizers, pharmaceuticals, cooking oils, lubricants, cosmetics. Dow chemical just doubled the cost of polyethylene as of April 1st. Taiwan relies on LNG for 40% of its energy production and has like 10 days of fuel left--semis are implicated. This is, on the high end, 20% of the use of fossil fuels. We overwhelmingly burn oil and gas. If we displaced the burning, Hormuz would not matter (or would minimally matter for a few molecules)…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend that petroleum is so deeply embedded in global manufacturing—from plastics to pharmaceuticals—that renewables cannot easily mitigate such a systemic economic threat &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548854&quot; title=&quot;Scanning some of the early comments here, and acting as-if the oil and LNG disruptions is just a question of renewable investment is naive. This is the worst energy crisis in modern history, and little of the western world has really started feeling the effects yet: https://thedispatch.com/newsletter/dispatch-energy/iran-war-... Petro is pretty much upstream of everything: plastics, fertilizers, pharmaceuticals, cooking oils, lubricants, cosmetics.  Dow chemical just doubled the cost of…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant concern that the West lacks the fiscal room to handle a crisis of this magnitude, which could potentially collapse the global economy and the AI industry &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548854&quot; title=&quot;Scanning some of the early comments here, and acting as-if the oil and LNG disruptions is just a question of renewable investment is naive. This is the worst energy crisis in modern history, and little of the western world has really started feeling the effects yet: https://thedispatch.com/newsletter/dispatch-energy/iran-war-... Petro is pretty much upstream of everything: plastics, fertilizers, pharmaceuticals, cooking oils, lubricants, cosmetics.  Dow chemical just doubled the cost of…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548843&quot; title=&quot;Eh, the war in Ukraine has kind of proven that the Europeans are not all that capable of action. There has been an enormous incentive to have been getting rid of oil dependency for 4 years now.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://meow.camera/#4258783365322591678&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Meow.camera&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (meow.camera)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543204&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;323 points · 72 comments · by surprisetalk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meow.camera is an independent, third-party viewer for the Hello Street Cat app that allows users to watch live feeds of remote-controlled cat feeders located across China. &lt;a href=&quot;https://meow.camera/#4258783365322591678&quot; title=&quot;Title: meow.camera    URL Source: https://meow.camera/    Warning: Target URL returned error 404: Not Found    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: meow.camera logo](https://meow.camera/logo.png)    what&amp;#39;s meow.camera?    meow.camera is an alternative viewer for feeders from the Hello Street Cat / JieMao (街猫) app.    we are NOT affiliated with the original app developer (Guangxi Ha Chong Network Technology Co., Ltd.) in any way and are developing this viewer just for fun.    what&amp;#39;s hello street cat?    the hello…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users enjoy the novelty of the live cat streams, though some note that technical delays in video loading often lead to &amp;#34;no cat&amp;#34; sightings and quick abandonment of the site &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47545305&quot; title=&quot;Every time this is posted I wonder if one could improve the backend so it doesn&amp;#39;t take 5-10 seconds for a video stream to connect. Right now it&amp;#39;s quite populated, but if I ever check it otherwise it&amp;#39;s like this: wait 10 seconds, no cat, wait 10 seconds, no cat, wait 7 seconds, leave.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While many viewers are eager to donate or pay to feed the animals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47546054&quot; title=&quot;If there was a button to feed them for a small donation id be broke.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47550176&quot; title=&quot;https://meow.camera/#4291269398483497042 This one immediately makes me want to whip out my credit card. Cute cat sitting at the food bowl waiting for someone to feed it. It&amp;#39;s one of the ones listed under &amp;#39;feeders with hungry cats&amp;#39; edit: credit card has been pulled out&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others observe that the identical enclosures suggest a standardized feeding system for strays, likely based in China &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47547826&quot; title=&quot;A lot of these enclosures are almost identical. There are only tiny differences. Is this a cat boarding house or something?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548150&quot; title=&quot;I believe it is a standardized feeding system for the strays  in China.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The presence of non-cat visitors, such as pugs, and the nostalgic comparison to old public camera feeds add to the community&amp;#39;s interest &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47546585&quot; title=&quot;For people reading that later: a dog (pug) was feeding right now&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47547897&quot; title=&quot;Reminds me of the days when you could look up public camera feeds with a specific string in a google search. Some of the camera pages had controls! Spent a day with friends in a college dorm scrolling through them.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://geohot.github.io//blog/jekyll/update/2026/02/26/the-last-gasps-of-the-rent-seeking-class.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Last gasps of the rent seeking class?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (geohot.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543201&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;168 points · 160 comments · by surprisetalk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;George Hotz argues that AI will dismantle the U.S. &amp;#34;rent-seeking&amp;#34; economy by equalizing time asymmetries and eliminating artificial friction, fueled by a shift toward commoditized Chinese open-source models that challenge the proprietary moats of American AI companies. &lt;a href=&quot;https://geohot.github.io//blog/jekyll/update/2026/02/26/the-last-gasps-of-the-rent-seeking-class.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Last Gasps of the Rent Seeking Class    URL Source: https://geohot.github.io/blog/jekyll/update/2026/02/26/the-last-gasps-of-the-rent-seeking-class.html    Published Time: 2026-02-26T00:00:00+08:00    Markdown Content:  # The Last Gasps of the Rent Seeking Class | the singularity is nearer    [the singularity is nearer](https://geohot.github.io/blog/)- [x]     [About](https://geohot.github.io/blog/about/)    # The Last Gasps of the Rent Seeking Class    Feb 26, 2026    &amp;gt; Over the past fifty years,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion explores how &amp;#34;agentic commerce&amp;#34; and AI might dismantle a rent-seeking economy built on human limitations, such as the time-wasting friction used by cable and insurance companies to exploit consumers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47546476&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The best anyone can hope for is a free market, with everything properly priced. But for decades, the American market has not been free. It’s used purposefully added friction to exploit a time asymmetry between the business and you. And due to things like call centers, this has been very profitable for the businesses. Cable companies and insurance rely on the fact that your time is more valuable than theirs. They can hire people in India at scale to waste your time. That is the market being…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47545322&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Over the past fifty years, the U.S. economy built a giant rent-extraction layer on top of human limitations: things take time, patience runs out, brand familiarity substitutes for diligence, and most people are willing to accept a bad price to avoid more clicks. Trillions of dollars of enterprise value depended on those constraints persisting. – Citrini Research Agentic commerce will render Amazon and the rest of the rent seeking marketplaces obsolete given enough time. Because LLMs can…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that middlemen are an intrinsic, emergent property of free markets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47546361&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; But for decades, the American market has not been free. The grand, boneheaded naivete to fail to understand that middlemen are an emergent and intrinsic property of free markets in practice.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others believe LLMs will soon bypass marketplaces like Amazon to deal directly with sellers, eliminating high platform fees &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47545322&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Over the past fifty years, the U.S. economy built a giant rent-extraction layer on top of human limitations: things take time, patience runs out, brand familiarity substitutes for diligence, and most people are willing to accept a bad price to avoid more clicks. Trillions of dollars of enterprise value depended on those constraints persisting. – Citrini Research Agentic commerce will render Amazon and the rest of the rent seeking marketplaces obsolete given enough time. Because LLMs can…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. However, skeptics question whether individuals will actually use AI to build their own tools given time constraints &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47544832&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not sure I buy the &amp;#39;everyone will be AI coding to replace things that cost money with their own apps&amp;#39; idea. I only have so much limited time in my day (and only so many tokens on my claude account per week). It&amp;#39;s probably going to make more sense for me to buy a tool that&amp;#39;s been given human attention over the span of weeks over something i prompt into existence in a few hours (especially if I need 10 such tools to accomplish something).&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, and some suggest the shift may simply replace one form of rent-seeking with another, such as paying big tech companies instead of human drivers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47544805&quot; title=&quot;Like self-driving taxis where the business model is to stop paying drivers so we can pay more to big tech companies. Viva la revolution!&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://owltec.ca/Other/Installing+a+Let%27s+Encrypt+TLS+certificate+on+a+Brother+printer+automatically+with+Certbot+(%26+Cloudflare)&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Installing a Let&amp;#39;s Encrypt TLS certificate on a Brother printer with Certbot&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (owltec.ca)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47542644&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;241 points · 54 comments · by 8organicbits&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This guide details an automated method for deploying Let&amp;#39;s Encrypt TLS certificates to Brother printers using a Bash script, Certbot with Cloudflare DNS verification, and the &amp;#34;Brother Cert&amp;#34; tool to handle the required RSA-2048 format. &lt;a href=&quot;https://owltec.ca/Other/Installing+a+Let%27s+Encrypt+TLS+certificate+on+a+Brother+printer+automatically+with+Certbot+(%26+Cloudflare)&quot; title=&quot;Title: Installing a Let&amp;#39;s Encrypt TLS certificate on a Brother printer automatically with Certbot (&amp;amp; Cloudflare)    URL Source: https://owltec.ca/Other/Installing+a+Let&amp;#39;s+Encrypt+TLS+certificate+on+a+Brother+printer+automatically+with+Certbot+(&amp;amp;+Cloudflare)    Markdown Content:  (2025/12/09)    Article inspiration:    *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the security risks of using DNS-01 challenges for internal devices, specifically the danger of storing powerful DNS API tokens on local machines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47544150&quot; title=&quot;I read a lot about people running things like Caddy which will automatically retrieve Lets Encrypt certificates. And I think it makes sense for publicly accessible web sites since you can use an HTTP challenge with Let&amp;#39;s Encrypt. For internal-use certificates, you&amp;#39;ll have to make use of a DNS challenge with Let&amp;#39;s Encrypt. I&amp;#39;ve been hesitant to set that up because I&amp;#39;m concerned about the potential compromise of a token that has permissions to edit my DNS zone. I see that the author creates…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest bypassing TLS entirely by using isolated VLANs, others argue that automated certificates are lower maintenance and resolve annoying browser security warnings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47544041&quot; title=&quot;why bother with tls, stick it on a separate vlan, lock down all the traffic&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47544231&quot; title=&quot;Some of this might have been &amp;#39;because I want to see if I can&amp;#39;. Another reason is &amp;#39;It bothers me to keep seeing this browser tell me my connection is insecure&amp;#39;. As for putting it on a separate VLAN and securing traffic with firewall rules, that may be as much or more trouble than setting up the automated certificate renewal. At least with the automated certificates there may not be any further maintenance required. With firewall rules, you&amp;#39;ll need to open up the firewall each time you want a new…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. To mitigate security concerns, users recommend narrowing credential scopes to specific records or using a CNAME alias to delegate validation to a separate, less sensitive domain &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47544692&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I&amp;#39;ve been hesitant to set that up because I&amp;#39;m concerned about the potential compromise of a token that has permissions to edit my DNS zone. Depending on your DNS provider, it may be possible to narrow the permissions to allow only updates of a particular record. Route53 as an example: {           &amp;#39;Effect&amp;#39;: &amp;#39;Allow&amp;#39;,           &amp;#39;Action&amp;#39;: &amp;#39;route53:ChangeResourceRecordSets&amp;#39;,           &amp;#39;Resource&amp;#39;: &amp;#39;arn:aws:route53:::hostedzone/ &amp;#39;,           &amp;#39;Condition&amp;#39;: {              &amp;#39;ForAllValues:StringEquals&amp;#39;: {      …&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47545040&quot; title=&quot;Yes, I see that AWS Route53 can limit credential scope. That kind of thing helps a lot. I&amp;#39;ve never heard of that CNAME approach for changing the validation domain. That looks like a viable solution since it requires a one-time setup on the main domain and ongoing access to the second (validation) domain.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47544444&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Am I being too paranoid here? Or is there a better way to allow DNS challenges without a token that allows too much power in editing a DNS zone? I&amp;#39;d look for a custom DNS challenge provider plugin which delegates the task of creating DNS records to another machine which holds the actual token.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.gadgetreview.com/hong-kong-police-can-now-demand-phone-passwords-under-new-security-rules&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hong Kong police can now demand phone passwords under new security rules&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (gadgetreview.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47542722&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;133 points · &lt;strong&gt;154 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by vidyesh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;New amendments to Hong Kong’s National Security Law now grant police warrantless power to demand passwords for encrypted devices, with penalties for refusal including up to one year in jail and a HK$100,000 fine. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.gadgetreview.com/hong-kong-police-can-now-demand-phone-passwords-under-new-security-rules&quot; title=&quot;Title: Hong Kong Police Can Now Demand Phone Passwords Under New Security Rules - Gadget Review    URL Source: https://www.gadgetreview.com/hong-kong-police-can-now-demand-phone-passwords-under-new-security-rules    Published Time: 2026-03-24T13:26:44-04:00    Markdown Content:  # Hong Kong Police Can Now Demand Phone Passwords Under New Security Rules - Gadget Review    When you buy through our links, you’re supporting our [mission](https://www.gadgetreview.com/about-us) of fighting fake…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a cynical comparison between Hong Kong’s new security rules and existing legal frameworks in the UK and US, with some users arguing that Western &amp;#34;rule of law&amp;#34; nations already employ similar or harsher compulsions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47542972&quot; title=&quot;Wow, what a free society! In the UK if you refuse to unlock your device you can be imprisoned indefinitely! In HK it&amp;#39;s just one year!&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543115&quot; title=&quot;The horrible bastion of despotism that is China-run Hong Kong has now caught up to the rule of law utopias of enlightened thought in the US and UK.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543118&quot; title=&quot;Wait till you hear about most of europe...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While there is consensus that the UK can imprison individuals for refusing to unlock devices, commenters disagree on the severity of US policies, noting that while the Fifth Amendment offers some protection, border agents (CBP) frequently demand passwords from travelers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543159&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;in the US and UK ??? Of all the issues with the US justice system, being compelled to disclose passwords isn&amp;#39;t one of them. It is an issue for UK, though.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543092&quot; title=&quot;Why are you misrepresenting about UK law? Yes, it can be a criminal offence.  But the maximum tariff for this under RIPA 2000 is five years. If it’s not about nation security or CSAM, it’s two. (Incidentally, the USA is a real outlier in this topic)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543286&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Of all the issues with the US justice system, being compelled to disclose passwords isn&amp;#39;t one of them. This is not totally true. It is also a US issue: CBP has been asking for passwords (or to unlock the device) for phones and computers for more than a year now. Last year, multiple people got turned around because they disagreed with US policies and political views that differ from those of the US&amp;#39;s current president.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. To counter these legal pressures, several users suggest &amp;#34;plausible deniability&amp;#34; features for mobile operating systems, such as secondary passwords that load decoy profiles containing harmless data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543212&quot; title=&quot;Feature request: Make it default behavior on phones that you can have multiple passwords, connected to different profiles. With no way to determine how many profiles a phone have. I&amp;#39;m sure there&amp;#39;s some people here working on mobile operating systems, might be worth considering?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543219&quot; title=&quot;It would be nice if phones had a feature where you can define more than one pin, but only one is for your actual phone contents - the other ones leave you to a completely harmless but otherwise indistinguishable looking smartphone interface that contains no or only completely bogus data.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitchroulette.net/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Twitch Roulette – Find live streamers who need views the most&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitchroulette.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47549160&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;177 points · 94 comments · by ellg&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Twitch Roulette is a newly re-launched platform that allows users to discover and support small streamers by browsing the less-viewed sections of Twitch through real-time channel statistics and breakdowns. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitchroulette.net/&quot; title=&quot;Hey HN, I re-launched an old site I remembered back in the day that someone made called twitchroulette.net with a lot of new features and stats and I would love for people to check it out. The idea is you can easily browse the less browsed parts of twitch and find cool and new streamers to say hi to, and maybe make some new friends.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;I also added some real time stats and breakdowns per channel and I think some of the things they show are pretty interesting. Check it out!&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights the prevalence of &amp;#34;zero-viewer&amp;#34; streams, with one developer noting that thousands of people stream to no one for weeks, leading to a debate over whether this is a pitiable state or a valid personal hobby &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47550669&quot; title=&quot;Great idea. One of my saddest projects was making a site to help Twitch streamers get sponsorship for playing games. You automatically got picked if your view count was high enough. I saw thousands of people streaming on Twitch by themselves for weeks with no viewers whatsoever. Surely many of them had families and partners, but I&amp;#39;m also sure many did not.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47551363&quot; title=&quot;Maybe I&amp;#39;m naive, but my sense is not everyone streaming on Twitch  is trying to make a career out of it. Even for those that are -- everyone starts somewhere. Hopefully those that aren&amp;#39;t successful on first brush notice and realize that it takes more than simply starting a stream to build a sticky audience. Also, there are many people out there who lead fulfilling lives without families and partners. Either way, I don&amp;#39;t think you should pity people so readily. At best it&amp;#39;s somewhat…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47551805&quot; title=&quot;What does having a family have to do with anything? I see many people with different hobbies that aren&amp;#39;t &amp;#39;successful&amp;#39;, do you also think if they have families or not? I don&amp;#39;t even get the implications, presumably it&amp;#39;d be worse to stream all day if you have a family you&amp;#39;re neglecting, but even that is making wild assumptions.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that streaming without an audience can be a useful tool for &amp;#34;rubber ducking&amp;#34; or practicing public speaking, others question the motivation behind it if not for entertainment or career goals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47552170&quot; title=&quot;I used to live code on Twitch regularly with zero viewers and it didn&amp;#39;t really bother me. It forced me to actively talk through my decision making processes just by streaming which slowed me down but was often useful.  I&amp;#39;m not sure what the family/partners part is about, I certainly had both while streaming.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47553309&quot; title=&quot;why would you stream on Twitch then? just because it‘s „fun“? come on&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. From a technical perspective, users noted that these empty streams likely impose a significant infrastructure cost on Twitch due to the real-time encoding and CDN requirements for thousands of concurrent broadcasts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47550331&quot; title=&quot;no comment on the political bits, but the fact that 80% of twitch is streaming to themselves cant be cheap to run I do wish they would revamp their discoverability process&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47550537&quot; title=&quot;youre still encoding to like, 4 different formats and pushing bytes to a cdn for 80k+ streams in real time. I think the actual serving of hls chunks is the cheap part&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://annas-archive.gd/isbn-visualization?&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ISBN Visualization&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (annas-archive.gd)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47547508&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;224 points · 41 comments · by Cider9986&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anna’s Archive has released an interactive visualization of over 100 million books, mapping ISBN prefixes to specific countries and publishers while highlighting book rarity based on library availability. &lt;a href=&quot;https://annas-archive.gd/isbn-visualization?&quot; title=&quot;Title: ISBN Visualization    URL Source: https://annas-archive.gd/isbn-visualization    Published Time: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 19:09:54 GMT    Markdown Content:  # ISBN Visualization    Netherlands    (978-90-)    Sweden    (978-91-)    International NGO Publishers and EU Organizations    (978-92-)    India    (978-93-)    Netherlands    (978-94-)    69309 publishers    (978-95)    60186 publishers    (978-96)    72095 publishers    (978-97)    64223 publishers    (978-98)    62665 publishers    (978-99)    France    (979-10-)    Korea,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users noted that the visualization highlights significant gaps in the collection, specifically regarding non-English languages and contemporary technical literature &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548647&quot; title=&quot;One problem I see with annas archive is that there is a tendency towards older books. Now I do understand this for many reasons, but ... I recently read a book about steel construction in 1932, just for curiousity. I wanted to find a more recent one - did not even have to be, say, 1990 or 2000 or some such, but I simply could not find any (well, perhaps english speaking, but this is also a problem in that non-english languages are VERY underpresented in general). I hope they can fix this in the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47549301&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s very strange to me how small Spanish is there. Second language in the world by native speakers, piracy being effectively legal in Spain (non commercially), and so on.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some find the current &amp;#34;bookshelf&amp;#34; interface difficult to read, there is an active bounty available for developers to improve the visualization &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47548691&quot; title=&quot;There is a bounty for improving the visualization[0]. [0]: https://software.annas-archive.gl/AnnaArchivist/annas-archiv...&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47551374&quot; title=&quot;The bookshelf is nice, but I&amp;#39;d love to be able to read the titles more easily - maybe rotate by 90 degrees?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, some participants use the archive as a &amp;#34;try-before-you-buy&amp;#34; tool to avoid bot-manipulated ratings on commercial platforms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47549249&quot; title=&quot;I got burned buying a trilogy with a good rating on goodreads. I only read the first 1.5 books and didn&amp;#39;t bother after that.   It sucked and when I looked again later it had a more relevant rating. I think the initial score was gamed by bots. So now I download from Anna&amp;#39;s archive and if it&amp;#39;s as good as I expected based on ratings then I pay for it, which I&amp;#39;ve done most recently for Children of Time. Thankfully I live somewhere where I can download legally.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.rubick.com/should-qa-exist/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Should QA exist?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (rubick.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47540929&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;119 points · &lt;strong&gt;142 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by PretzelFisch&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Engineering leadership expert Jade Rubick argues that while traditional QA handoffs often hinder velocity, organizations should evolve the role into &amp;#34;Automated Verification Engineers&amp;#34; who focus on high-leverage automation and AI-driven testing to support engineering-owned quality. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.rubick.com/should-qa-exist/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Should QA exist | Jade Rubick - Engineering Leadership    URL Source: https://www.rubick.com/should-qa-exist/    Markdown Content:  # Should QA exist | Jade Rubick - Engineering Leadership    [![Image 1: Jade Rubick](https://www.rubick.com/_astro/avatar.Cprm3iPk_hQixN.webp) jade…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a strong consensus that QA is essential because specialists identify edge cases and regressions that developers, who are often biased toward their own logic or pressured by deadlines, fail to consider &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47541201&quot; title=&quot;100% and I’m a software developer and have been for ~30 years. Good QA people know how to find regression and bugs _that you didn’t think about_ which is the whole reason why it shouldn’t be under “engineering” and that it should exist. One of the QA people I work with currently is one of my favorite people. They don’t always make me happy (in the moment) with their bugs or with how they decide to break the software, but in the end it makes a better, more resilient product.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47541428&quot; title=&quot;Agreed. QA specialists are there to think about what the engineer didn&amp;#39;t think about. Unless the engineer is incompetent or the organization is broken, the engineer has already written tests for everything they could think of, but they can&amp;#39;t think of everything. More importantly, it is almost impossible for engineers to be as well incentivized to spend extra time exploring edge cases in something they already believe to work than to ship a feature on time. Like everything else though, its…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47541286&quot; title=&quot;Exactly. I spent 20 years split between MS and Apple. Some of the best people I ever worked with were in QA. One guy in particular was an extremely talented engineer who simply didn&amp;#39;t enjoy the canonical &amp;#39;coding&amp;#39; role; what he did enjoy was finding bugs and breaking things. ;-)&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that manual QA is obsolete and should be replaced by automated UI/API testing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47541055&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Before I weigh in further, I’d like to make sure you’re familiar with the testing pyramid.&amp;#39; The testing pyramid is a par excellance SWE kool-aid. Someone wrote a logically-sounding blogpost about it many years ago and then people started regurgitating it without any empirical evidence behind it. Many of us have realised that you need a &amp;#39;testing hourglass&amp;#39;, not a &amp;#39;testing pyramid&amp;#39;. Unit tests are universally considered useful, there&amp;#39;s not much debate about it (also they&amp;#39;re cheap). Integration…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others maintain that human testing is irreplaceable for products used by humans and provides high-value &amp;#34;smoke tests&amp;#34; that automation might miss &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47541157&quot; title=&quot;If your product is used by humans, then it needs to be tested by humans - this cannot be automated. Those humans can be your QA people, or your customers. Perhaps your customers are happy to be testers, perhaps not. Unit tests are very expensive and return little value. Conversely, a (manual?) &amp;#39;smoke test&amp;#39; is very cheap and returns great value - the first thing you do when updating a server for example is to check it still responds (and nothing has gone wrong in the deployment process), takes 2…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47541347&quot; title=&quot;Yes, QA is important. My code will always &amp;#39;work&amp;#39; in that everything I tested is bug free. But having someone other test, especially someone who knows the service is gold. But there is also bad QA: The most worthless QA I was forced to work with, was an external company, where I, as developer, had to write the test sheet and they just tested that. Obviously they could not find bugs as I tested everything on the sheet. My most impressive QA experience where when I helped out a famous Japanese…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, the field faces significant challenges, including a &amp;#34;class divide&amp;#34; where QA roles are often less respected or paid than engineering, leading talented individuals to transition out of the discipline &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47542974&quot; title=&quot;Really? The best people I worked with were never QA. Moreover, the best QAs would almost always try to be not QA - to shift into a better respected and better paid field. I wish it werent so (hence my username) but there is a definite class divide between devs and QA and it shows up not just in terms of the pay packets but also who gets the boot in down times and who gets listened to. This definitely affects the quality of people. I think it&amp;#39;s overdue an overhaul much like the sysadmin-&amp;gt;devops…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-03-26</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-03-26</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.derekthompson.org/p/we-havent-seen-the-worst-of-what&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;We haven&amp;#39;t seen the worst of what gambling and prediction markets will do&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (derekthompson.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47534848&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;899 points · 692 comments · by mmcclure&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rapid expansion of gambling and prediction markets into sports, war, and politics is eroding institutional integrity, fueling corruption among officials and journalists, and replacing traditional social values with a &amp;#34;grotesque&amp;#34; market logic that incentivizes betting on global tragedies and rigged outcomes. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.derekthompson.org/p/we-havent-seen-the-worst-of-what&quot; title=&quot;Title: We Haven’t Seen the Worst of What Gambling and Prediction Markets Will Do to America    URL Source: https://www.derekthompson.org/p/we-havent-seen-the-worst-of-what    Published Time: 2026-03-26T10:01:17+00:00    Markdown Content:  Here are three stories about the state of gambling in America.    1.   **Baseball**    In November 2025, two pitchers for the Cleveland Guardians, Emmanuel Clase and Luis Ortiz, were charged in a conspiracy for “rigging pitches.” Frankly, I had never heard of rigged…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that prediction markets and online gambling are &amp;#34;weaponized&amp;#34; products designed to prey on human psychology, leading some tech leaders to refuse to hire anyone who has worked on them &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47535377&quot; title=&quot;The craziest thing here is that online gambling has been legal in the UK and Ireland for many years, and it&amp;#39;s been such an obvious negative for those countries — and had been optimized brutally like any other tech product. When I moved over to the US a decade ago, I remember thinking &amp;#39;well at least they&amp;#39;re smart enough to have banned online gambling&amp;#39;. I am very pro personal liberties, but this stuff is weaponized to prey on a subset of humanity. I&amp;#39;m in senior leadership, and have made it clear…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47535610&quot; title=&quot;This is such a HN comment. Yes, I am not hiring those people either. If that sounds unviable or even uncommon then you’re just too deep in the culture. This is quite common.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view these markets as a dangerous &amp;#34;gambling loophole&amp;#34; that creates financial incentives for insiders to cause societal harm or leak secrets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47534986&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Predictions&amp;#39; market is the silliest loophole for gambling. Honestly, more surprised Fanduel, DraftKings and the like who have spent millions on lobbying and buying licenses, are not fighting tooth and nail on this.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47535069&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;where key decision makers in government have the tantalizing options to make hundreds of thousands of dollars by synchronizing military engagements with their gambling position&amp;#39; To wit: where key decision makers in government can get paid to reveal war secretes to our enemies.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47535071&quot; title=&quot;Just game-theoretically, suppose you bet $100 on some disaster. That disaster causes $10,000,000 of harm, but only causes you $90 of harm individually. You&amp;#39;ve gained $10, but your $10 gain is a millionth of the harm caused. Generally-speaking, there&amp;#39;s an enormous asymmetry between the cost to create/build and the cost to destroy. So now we have a mechanism by which individuals have a financial incentive to cause harm... Don&amp;#39;t these markets create a mechanism for society to race to…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others defend them as a matter of personal liberty, comparing the risks to those of alcohol, junk food, or the stock market &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47535952&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I am very pro personal liberties, but this stuff is weaponized to prey on a subset of humanity This triggers thoughts. I don&amp;#39;t like people being taken advantage of. At the same time, I like my personal liberties. It feels like you can spin this idea for nearly anything. Apparently 25% of alcohol sales are to alcoholics. That sucks and you could spin this has the liquor companies taking advantage, but I have tons of friends that enjoy drinking and tons of good experiences drinking with them…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47535491&quot; title=&quot;Actually, prediction markets are closer to stock markets (insofar as you consider stock trading to be gambling).  Insider trading is the bigger issue&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47535097&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I don’t think people have thought hard enough about how bad this could get. given that the crypto anarchist papers from the 90s that these markets are built on are very well thought out instruction manuals about how bad it could get, this title implies users are gullible idiots as opposed to the creators and power users An individual&amp;#39;s susceptibility to a vice is an individual problem. So I take issue with all the flippant comments about this being a &amp;#39;gambling loophole&amp;#39;, like, who cares? I…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics of the hiring ban suggest it is hypocritical to single out gambling while ignoring the predatory nature of mainstream social media and big tech companies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47535512&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I&amp;#39;m in senior leadership, and have made it clear that anyone who has worked on these products should not be hired. Can&amp;#39;t say I agree with that specific take (and find it a bit naive to be honest), unless you&amp;#39;re also not hiring anyone from companies like Amazon, Meta, and all the other tech companies that have also ruined/preyed on society in their own way just as much as any gambling app has.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://9to5mac.com/2026/03/26/apple-discontinues-the-mac-pro/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apple discontinues the Mac Pro&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (9to5mac.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47535708&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;656 points · 641 comments · by bentocorp&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple has discontinued the Mac Pro and confirmed it has no plans for future hardware, positioning the Mac Studio as its flagship professional desktop moving forward. &lt;a href=&quot;https://9to5mac.com/2026/03/26/apple-discontinues-the-mac-pro/&quot; title=&quot;Apple discontinues the Mac Pro with no plans for future hardware - 9to5Mac    It’s the end of an era: Apple has confirmed to 9to5Mac that the Mac Pro is being discontinued. It has...    [Skip to main content](#main)    Toggle main menu    [9to5Mac Logo Go to the 9to5Mac home page](https://9to5mac.com/)     Switch site    * [9to5Toys](https://9to5toys.com)  * [9to5Google Logo9to5Google](https://9to5google.com)  * [Electrek](https://electrek.co)  * [Drone DJ LogoDroneDJ](https://dronedj.com)  * [Space…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discontinuation of the Mac Pro is seen by some as an inevitable result of Apple’s Silicon transition, which rendered the machine’s large chassis &amp;#34;mostly air&amp;#34; since it lacked support for third-party GPUs and user-upgradable RAM &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537646&quot; title=&quot;I think that&amp;#39;s an expected thing. G5 was the thing. And companies were buying G5 and other macs like that all the time, because you were able to actually extend it with video cards and some special equipment. But now we have M chips. You don&amp;#39;t need video for M chips. You kinda do, but truthfully, it&amp;#39;s cheaper to buy a beefier Mac than to install a video card. Pro was a great thing for designers and video editors, those freaks who need to color-calibrate monitors. And right now even mini works…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47538671&quot; title=&quot;As someone who came from the SGI O2/Octane era when high-end workstations were compact, distinctive, and sexy, I’ve never really understood the allure of the Mac Pro, with the exception of the 2013 Mac Pro tube, which I owned (small footprint, quiet, and powerful). For me, aesthetics and size are important. That workstation on your desk should justify its presence, not just exist as some hulking box. When Apple released the Mac Studio, it made perfect sense from a form-factor point-of-view. The…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537366&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Serviceable, repairable, upgradable Macs are officially a thing of the past. Well, not exactly. Apple’s desktop Macs actually all have modular SSD storage, and third parties sell upgrade kits. And it’s not like Thunderbolt is a slouch as far as expandability. I can see why the Mac Pro is gone. Yeah, it has PCIe slots…that I don’t really think anyone is using. It’s not like you can drop an RTX 5090 in there. The latest Mac Pro didn’t have upgradable memory so it wasn’t much different than a…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that external interfaces like Thunderbolt have replaced the need for internal PCIe slots, others contend this is a &amp;#34;wild and wrong take&amp;#34; that ignores the ongoing necessity of PCIe for high-performance hardware and storage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537646&quot; title=&quot;I think that&amp;#39;s an expected thing. G5 was the thing. And companies were buying G5 and other macs like that all the time, because you were able to actually extend it with video cards and some special equipment. But now we have M chips. You don&amp;#39;t need video for M chips. You kinda do, but truthfully, it&amp;#39;s cheaper to buy a beefier Mac than to install a video card. Pro was a great thing for designers and video editors, those freaks who need to color-calibrate monitors. And right now even mini works…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537745&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; gone are the days of PCIe. My GPU, NVMe drives and motherboard might disagree.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47538248&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; gone are the days of PCIe This is a wild and very wrong take. Just about every single consumer computer shipped today uses PCIe. If you were referring to only only the physical PCIe slots, that&amp;#39;s wrong too: the vast majority of desktop computers, servers, and workstations shipped in 2025 had physical PCIe slots (the only ones that didn&amp;#39;t were Macs and certain mini-PCs). The 2023 Mac Pro was dead on arrival because Apple doesn&amp;#39;t let you use PCIe GPUs in their systems.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant point of contention is Apple&amp;#39;s missed opportunity to compete with Nvidia in the AI sector; critics argue Apple wasted its infrastructure by not offering multi-GPU workstations, while defenders suggest Apple is instead betting on &amp;#34;model shrink&amp;#34; to make their existing Studio hardware sufficient for future AI needs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47538218&quot; title=&quot;Apple really dropped the ball here. They had every ability to make something competitive with Nvidia for AI training as well as inference, by selling high end multi GPU Mac Pro workstations as well as servers, but for some reason chose not to. They had the infrastructure and custom SoCs and everything. What a waste. It really could have been a bigger market for them than even the iPhone.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47538282&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; something competitive with Nvidia for AI training Apple is counting on something else: model shrink. Every one is now looking at &amp;#39;how do we make these smaller&amp;#39;. At some point a beefy Mac Studio and the &amp;#39;right sized&amp;#39; model is going to be what people want. Apple dumped a 4 pack of them in the hands of a lot of tech influencers a few months back and they were fairly interesting (expensive tho).&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/26/world/olympics/ioc-transgender-athletes-ban.html?unlocked_article_code=1.WFA.U8U0.iEs61HsUkQj5&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Olympic Committee bars transgender athletes from women’s events&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nytimes.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47530945&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;358 points · &lt;strong&gt;832 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by RestlessMind&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The International Olympic Committee has announced a new policy banning transgender athletes from competing in women’s events starting with the 2028 Olympic Games. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/26/world/olympics/ioc-transgender-athletes-ban.html?unlocked_article_code=1.WFA.U8U0.iEs61HsUkQj5&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;sports.yahoo.com&amp;amp;#x2F;olympics&amp;amp;#x2F;breaking-news&amp;amp;#x2F;article&amp;amp;#x2F;transgender-athletes-banned-from-competing-in-womens-category-starting-at-2028-olympics-international-olympic-committee-announces-140151332.html&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;sports.yahoo.com&amp;amp;#x2F;olympics&amp;amp;#x2F;breaking-news&amp;amp;#x2F;article&amp;amp;#x2F;tran...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide between those who view the ban as a necessary protection of biological categories &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47533060&quot; title=&quot;I wonder if anyone has measured the speed in which reality is codified into law or regulation. Women have been fighting against males in female sports for many, many years. Why did it take so long for something so obvious to be acted upon?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt; and those who argue the issue is statistically overblown, noting that trans women have historically won zero Olympic medals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47533292&quot; title=&quot;Trans women have competed as women in the Olympics once ever and have 0 medals. By the numbers it&amp;#39;s a non issue under previous rules (despite the incredible amount of ink spilled over it). People are talking about trans women here but the vast majority of people affected by this change are women who are not trans who have a &amp;#39;disorder of sexual development&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47533146&quot; title=&quot;Has anyone measured trans athletes performance? I see this topic come up repeatedly in different guises, protect women from the evil trans-agenda. But I haven&amp;#39;t seen where this is actually a problem. Do trans-athletes regularly out perform &amp;#39;born as&amp;#39; (not sure the best way to phrase it) athletes?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters point out that the new regulations, which often require transitioning before age 12, are difficult to meet due to legal restrictions on early transition and the limited decision-making capacity of children &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47534510&quot; title=&quot;The guidelines for trans female athletes for the 2024 Paris Olympics involved transitioning before the age of 12/puberty to be eligible. There&amp;#39;s more info at https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/olympics/paris-2024-olym...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47535030&quot; title=&quot;Incidentally, many countries/states are working hard to make it impossible to transition that early.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47535223&quot; title=&quot;At 12 you simply do not have sufficient capacity to make a good decision on the matter.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, critics argue the rules unfairly target intersex athletes and police biological advantages in a way that is not applied to other physical traits like height &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47533292&quot; title=&quot;Trans women have competed as women in the Olympics once ever and have 0 medals. By the numbers it&amp;#39;s a non issue under previous rules (despite the incredible amount of ink spilled over it). People are talking about trans women here but the vast majority of people affected by this change are women who are not trans who have a &amp;#39;disorder of sexual development&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47536136&quot; title=&quot;This is one of the rare problems where there exists no good solution to the issue. Even without taking transfem athletes into consideration, there still remains a problem for women&amp;#39;s sports in that sex (not gender) is not fully black and white, male and female, and some high-performing female athletes show signs of intersex, which has caused this entire hysteria about checking for penises. How do you ever come up with a sane way to deal with this? (apart from events that are genderless like…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47533368&quot; title=&quot;Not only trans athletes, but any biologically born women the IOC thinks are insufficiently feminine. It’s an unfair advantage apparently. You know, like being born tall for basketball players. Curious how no other biological advantages are being policed.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/end-of-chat-control-eu-parliament-stops-mass-surveillance-in-voting-thriller-paving-the-way-for-genuine-child-protection/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;End of &amp;quot;Chat Control&amp;quot;: EU parliament stops mass surveillance&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (patrick-breyer.de)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47529609&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;680 points · 308 comments · by amarcheschi&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The European Parliament has voted to end &amp;#34;Chat Control,&amp;#34; a controversial regulation allowing tech companies to scan private messages, effectively restoring digital privacy for EU citizens as the interim law expires on April 4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/end-of-chat-control-eu-parliament-stops-mass-surveillance-in-voting-thriller-paving-the-way-for-genuine-child-protection/&quot; title=&quot;Title: End of “Chat Control”: EU Parliament Stops Mass Surveillance in Voting Thriller – Paving the Way for Genuine Child Protection!    URL Source: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/end-of-chat-control-eu-parliament-stops-mass-surveillance-in-voting-thriller-paving-the-way-for-genuine-child-protection/    Published Time: 2026-03-26T13:04:50+01:00    Markdown Content:  # End of “Chat Control”: EU Parliament Stops Mass Surveillance in Voting Thriller – Paving the Way for Genuine Child Protection! –…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the EU Parliament&amp;#39;s decision is seen as a temporary victory for privacy, commenters express deep cynicism, noting that proponents often use &amp;#34;infinite retries&amp;#34; and rebranding to push rejected surveillance measures back onto the agenda &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47530841&quot; title=&quot;It seems like an almost never ending hamster wheel of chat control being introduced, voted down, then introduced again in the next session.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47529928&quot; title=&quot;Its time to start trying to push Chat Control 2.0. With enough money and infinite retries eventually all the bad regulations with a power group behind will end being approved.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47530012&quot; title=&quot;Or it will get a new name. Just like „Chat Control“ is far from the first name for this BS.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue the EU&amp;#39;s structure lacks sufficient checks and balances and direct accountability, leading some to claim the institution is fundamentally flawed or even &amp;#34;totalitarian&amp;#34; in its persistence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47529954&quot; title=&quot;The EU is becoming more and more fascist in every regard. With every new proposal, every vote, they are closer to the totalitarian regime. Proposals can be declined a million times, but the EU regime is always finding sneakier and more manipulative ways to push again and again. And once it passes, it can become only worse in the next iterations. I can already see a coordinated attack on any freedoms and rights from the governing regimes in member states and their endless propaganda. At this…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47530034&quot; title=&quot;The EU is fundamentally flawed. There are no checks and balances, and its only democratic if you squint and look at it the right way. People need to directly elect the MPs, directly elect some kind of president. They have no accountability, no checks and balances.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47530736&quot; title=&quot;Non-elected representatives from my country keep pushing for chat control via the council.  How do I, as a citizen, hold them accountable?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, some view this repetitive cycle as the natural &amp;#34;work of a democracy,&amp;#34; where the defense successfully maintains the status quo against a persistent opposition &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47534446&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; further procedural steps by EU governments cannot be completely ruled out In a democracy, we don&amp;#39;t kill our opposition. If they hold views we don&amp;#39;t like, e.g. that security trumps privacy, they&amp;#39;re going to litigate them. Probably their whole lives. That means they&amp;#39;ll keep bringing up the same ideas. And you&amp;#39;ll have to keep defeating them. But there are two corollaries. One: Passing legislation takes as much work as repealing it; but unpassed legislation has no force of law. Being on the side…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Concerns remain high regarding &amp;#34;Chat Control 2.0,&amp;#34; which may soon mandate age verification via ID or facial scans, potentially ending anonymous communication &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47529682&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Despite today’s victory, further procedural steps by EU governments cannot be completely ruled out. Most of all, the trilogue negotiations on a permanent child protection regulation (Chat Control 2.0) are continuing under severe time pressure. There, too, EU governments continue to insist on their demand for “voluntary” indiscriminate Chat Control. &amp;gt; Furthermore, the next massive threat to digital civil liberties is already on the agenda: Next up in the ongoing trilogue, lawmakers will…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://unterwaditzer.net/2025/codeberg.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Moving from GitHub to Codeberg, for lazy people&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (unterwaditzer.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47530330&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;634 points · 335 comments · by jslakro&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Markus Unterwaditzer outlines a simplified process for migrating repositories from GitHub to Codeberg, highlighting easy built-in import tools for issues and PRs while recommending Forgejo Actions as a familiar CI alternative for those transitioning from GitHub Actions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://unterwaditzer.net/2025/codeberg.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Moving from  GitHub to Codeberg, for lazy people    URL Source: https://unterwaditzer.net/2025/codeberg.html    Published Time: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 10:49:45 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Moving from GitHub to Codeberg, for lazy people - Markus Unterwaditzer    ## [Markus Unterwaditzer](https://unterwaditzer.net/)    # Moving from GitHub to Codeberg, for lazy people    2025-09-06    I’ve just started to migrate some repositories from GitHub to Codeberg. I’ve wanted to do this for a long time but have stalled…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Codeberg is a strong option for established FOSS projects, users note it is not a direct GitHub replacement due to restrictive policies against private repositories, non-FOSS content, and personal homepages &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47531209&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t dislike Codeberg inherently, but it&amp;#39;s not a &amp;#39;true&amp;#39; GitHub replacement. It can handle a good chunk of GitHub repositories (namely those for well established FOSS projects looking to have everything a proper capital P project has), but if you&amp;#39;re just looking for a generic place to put your code projects that aren&amp;#39;t necessarily intended for public release and support (ie. random automation scripts, scraps of concepts that never really got off the ground, things not super cleaned up),…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47531680&quot; title=&quot;From their FAQ: &amp;gt; If you do not contribute to free/libre software (or if it is limited to your personal homepage) , and we feel like you only abuse Codeberg for storing your commercial projects or media backups, we might get unhappy about that. Emphasis mine. This isn&amp;#39;t about if it&amp;#39;s technically possible (it certainly is), it&amp;#39;s whether or not it&amp;#39;s allowed by their platform policies. Their page publishing feature seems more like it&amp;#39;s meant for projects and organizations rather than individual…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47532164&quot; title=&quot;Which makes it not really a suitable replacement for GitHub, which is my entire point. Keep in mind, I&amp;#39;m not saying Codeberg is bad , but it&amp;#39;s terms of use are pretty clear in the sense that they only really want FOSS and anyone who has something other than FOSS better look elsewhere. GitHub allowed you to basically put up anything that&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;yours&amp;#39; and the license wasn&amp;#39;t really their concern - that isn&amp;#39;t the case with Codeberg. It&amp;#39;s not about price or anything either; it&amp;#39;d be fine if the offer…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics highlight reliability issues and the lack of robust DDoS protection compared to major competitors, though others argue that Git&amp;#39;s distributed nature should mitigate the impact of server downtime &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47531091&quot; title=&quot;Lazy has nothing to do with it, codeberg simply doesn&amp;#39;t work. Most of my friends who use codeberg are staunch cloudflare-opponents, but cloudflare is what keeps Gitlab alive. Fact of life is that they&amp;#39;re being attacked non-stop, and need some sort of DDoS filter. Codeberg has that anubis thing now I guess? But they still have downtime, and the worst thing ever for me as a developer is having the urge to code and not being able to access my remote. That is what murders the impression of a…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47531221&quot; title=&quot;Maybe I&amp;#39;m too old school, but both GitHub and Codeberg for me are asyncronous &amp;#39;I want to send/share the code somehow&amp;#39;, not &amp;#39;my active workspace I require to do work&amp;#39;. But reading &amp;gt; the worst thing ever for me as a developer is having the urge to code and not being able to access my remote. Makes it seem like GitHub/Codeberg has to be online for you to be able to code, is that really the case? If so, how does that happen, you only edit code directly in the GitHub web UI or how does one end up in…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, there is skepticism that community-driven forges can match GitHub&amp;#39;s high &amp;#34;table stakes,&amp;#34; such as integrated CI/CD and native support for diverse architectures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47531168&quot; title=&quot;I think evaluating alternatives to GitHub is going to become increasingly important over the coming years. At the same time, I think these kinds of migrations discount how much GitHub has changed the table stakes/raised the bar for what makes a valuable source forge: it&amp;#39;s simply no longer reasonable to BYO CI or accept one that can&amp;#39;t natively build for a common set of end-user architectures. This on its own makes me pretty bearish on community-driven attempts to oust GitHub, even if…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47532222&quot; title=&quot;The truth is that I publish OSS projects on GitHub because that&amp;#39;s where the community is, and the issues/pull requests/discussions are a bonus. If I just want to host my code, I can self host or use an SSH/SFTP server as a git remote, and that&amp;#39;s usually what I do.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.hofstede.it/shell-tricks-that-actually-make-life-easier-and-save-your-sanity/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Shell Tricks That Make Life Easier (and Save Your Sanity)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.hofstede.it)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47525243&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;639 points · 277 comments · by zdw&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This guide outlines essential terminal shortcuts and shell techniques, such as Emacs-style line editing, history searching with `CTRL + R`, and brace expansion, to help users navigate command-line interfaces more efficiently across various POSIX-compliant and interactive shells like Bash and Zsh. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.hofstede.it/shell-tricks-that-actually-make-life-easier-and-save-your-sanity/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Shell Tricks That Actually Make Life Easier (And Save Your Sanity)    URL Source: https://blog.hofstede.it/shell-tricks-that-actually-make-life-easier-and-save-your-sanity/    Published Time: 2026-03-26T00:00:00+01:00    Markdown Content:  There is a distinct, visceral kind of pain in watching an otherwise brilliant engineer hold down the Backspace key for six continuous seconds to fix a typo at the beginning of a line.    We’ve all been there. We learn `ls`, `cd`,and `grep`, and then we sort of……&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide between users who prefer &amp;#34;vi-mode&amp;#34; for complex command editing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528246&quot; title=&quot;Using the terminal becomes much more cozy and comfortable after I activate vim-mode. A mistake 3 words earlier? No problem: 3bcw and I&amp;#39;m good to go. Want to delete the whole thing? Even easier: cc I can even use v to open the command inside a fully-fledged (neo)vim instance for more complex rework. If you use (neo)vim already, this is the best way to go as there are no new shortcuts to learn and memorize.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528029&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The “Works (Almost) Everywhere” Club &amp;gt; The Backspace Replacements Also known as &amp;#39;emacs editing mode&amp;#39;. Funnily enough, what POSIX mandates is the support for &amp;#39;vi editing mode&amp;#39; which, to my knowledge, almost nobody ever uses. But it&amp;#39;s there in most shells, and you can enable it with &amp;#39;set -o vi&amp;#39; in e.g. bash.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt; and those who find it cumbersome, opting instead for Emacs-style shortcuts or the `Ctrl-x e` shortcut to open a full editor for heavy lifting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528023&quot; title=&quot;CTRL + W usually deletes everything until the previous whitespace, so it would delete the whole &amp;#39;/var/log/nginx/&amp;#39; string in OP&amp;#39;s example. Alt + backspace usually deletes until it encounters a non-alphanumeric character. Be careful working CTRL + W into muscle memory though, I&amp;#39;ve lost count of how many browser tabs I&amp;#39;ve closed by accident...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528551&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been a (n)vim user for 20+ years now, but I hate vi-mode in the shell. However if I feel that I need to do a complex command, I just do ctrl-x+e to open up in neovim (with EDITOR=nvim set). I find it a good middle ground.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant consensus exists around improving history navigation, with users recommending remapping the up-arrow for prefix-based searches &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47529673&quot; title=&quot;One thing I find life-changing is to remap the up arrow so that it does not iterates through all commands, but only those starting with the characters I have already written. So e.g. I can type `tar -`, then the up arrow, and get the tar parameters that worked last time. In zsh this is configured with bindkey &amp;#39;^[OA&amp;#39; up-line-or-beginning-search # Up      bindkey &amp;#39;^[OB&amp;#39; down-line-or-beginning-search # Down&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, utilizing `Ctrl-r` for reverse searches &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47529862&quot; title=&quot;Once you start using CTRL+r, you may find that you never reach for up arrow again.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, or integrating `fzf` for advanced filtering &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47530004&quot; title=&quot;And once you want to one-up this look into fzf.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable &amp;#34;hacks&amp;#34; mentioned include a simple `cat` script named `\#` to easily comment out parts of a pipe &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528050&quot; title=&quot;I love this, from a comment on the article: He had in his path a script called `\#` that he used to comment out pipe elements like `mycmd1 | \# mycmd2 | mycmd3`. This was how the script was written:       ```    #!/bin/sh    cat    ```&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt; and the use of `Alt-backspace` versus `Ctrl-w` for varying levels of word deletion &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528023&quot; title=&quot;CTRL + W usually deletes everything until the previous whitespace, so it would delete the whole &amp;#39;/var/log/nginx/&amp;#39; string in OP&amp;#39;s example. Alt + backspace usually deletes until it encounters a non-alphanumeric character. Be careful working CTRL + W into muscle memory though, I&amp;#39;ve lost count of how many browser tabs I&amp;#39;ve closed by accident...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/itigges22/ATLAS&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;$500 GPU outperforms Claude Sonnet on coding benchmarks&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47533297&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;483 points · 282 comments · by yogthos&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The ATLAS framework enables a frozen 14B model running on a single $500 consumer GPU to outperform Claude 4.5 Sonnet on coding benchmarks by using a specialized pipeline of structured generation, energy-based verification, and self-verified iterative repair. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/itigges22/ATLAS&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - itigges22/ATLAS: Adaptive Test-time Learning and Autonomous Specialization    URL Source: https://github.com/itigges22/ATLAS    Markdown Content:  # GitHub - itigges22/ATLAS: Adaptive Test-time Learning and Autonomous Specialization · GitHub    [Skip to content](https://github.com/itigges22/ATLAS#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [](https://github.com/)    [Sign in](https://github.com/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fitigges22%2FATLAS)    Appearance…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While benchmarks suggest affordable hardware can rival top-tier models, users report that cheaper alternatives often suffer from higher reasoning token usage, slower speeds, and palpable degradation in real-world tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47538089&quot; title=&quot;I’d encourage devs to use MiniMax, Kimi, etc for real world tasks that require intelligence. The down sides emerge pretty fast: much higher reasoning token use, slower outputs, and degradation that is palpable. Sadly, you do get what you pay for right now. However that doesn’t prevent you from saving tons through smart model routing, being smart about reasoning budgets, and using max output tokens wisely. And optimize your apps and prompts to reduce output tokens.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a sharp divide regarding the cost of State-of-the-Art (SOTA) models; some view the $200 monthly subscriptions as a bargain for the utility provided, while others argue these prices reflect a &amp;#34;bubble&amp;#34; that ignores global economic realities where such fees can equal half a month&amp;#39;s rent &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47539646&quot; title=&quot;Why is that? The $200 per month subscription comes with a ton of usage. Opus 4.6 is available on the $20 plan too&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47540565&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The $200 per month subscription comes with a ton of usage. $200 dollars + VAT is half of my rent. I know HN is not a good place to rant on this subject, but I&amp;#39;m often flabbergasted about the number of people here that lives in a bubble with regard to the price of tech. Or just prices in general. I remember someone who said a few years ago (I&amp;#39;m paraphrasing): &amp;#39;You could just use one of the empty room in your house!&amp;#39;. It was so outlandish I believed it was a joke at first. EDIT: &amp;#39;not&amp;#39;, minor…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the race to the bottom in API pricing—with some models now costing less than the local electricity required to run them—experienced developers remain skeptical of current benchmarks, noting they fail to measure &amp;#34;mastery&amp;#34; in complex, non-generative tasks like debugging build systems or scanning logs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537903&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a race to the bottom. DeepSeek beats all others (single-shot), and it is ~50% cheaper than the cost of local electricity only. &amp;gt; DeepSeek V3.2 Reasoning  86.2%  ~$0.002  API, single-shot &amp;gt; ATLAS V3 (pass@1-v(k=3))  74.6%  ~$0.004  Local electricity only, best-of-3 + repair pipeline&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47539830&quot; title=&quot;Generating big chunks of code is rarely what I want from an agent. They really shine for stuff like combing through logs or scanning dozens of source files to explain a test failure. Which benchmark covers that? I want the debugging benchmark that tests mastery of build systems, CLIs, etc.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/26/business/anthropic-pentagon-injunction-supply-chain-risk&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Judge blocks Pentagon effort to &amp;#39;punish&amp;#39; Anthropic with supply chain risk label&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cnn.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537228&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;443 points · 230 comments · by prawn&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A federal judge blocked the Pentagon’s attempt to label Anthropic a supply chain risk, ruling the designation was illegal retaliation for the AI company’s refusal to remove safety guardrails prohibiting its technology&amp;#39;s use in autonomous weapons and mass surveillance. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/26/business/anthropic-pentagon-injunction-supply-chain-risk&quot; title=&quot;Title: Judge blocks Pentagon’s effort to ‘punish’ Anthropic by labeling it a supply chain risk    URL Source: https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/26/business/anthropic-pentagon-injunction-supply-chain-risk    Published Time: 2026-03-26T23:21:49.232Z    Markdown Content:  # Judge blocks Pentagon’s effort to ‘punish’ Anthropic by labeling it a supply chain risk | CNN Business    Ad Feedback    ### CNN values your feedback     1. How relevant is this ad to you?      2. Did you encounter any technical issues?     - [x] …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The court&amp;#39;s block of the &amp;#34;supply chain risk&amp;#34; label is seen by some as a victory for institutional checks and balances &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47538287&quot; title=&quot;Had this conversation with a friend, but I think as an America you can be very optimistic about the institutional strength of democracy in the country. People are very pessimistic recently, but if anything, we are seeing that our system works well.  A person got into power that a majority voted for, but when he oversteps, the courts and other institutions (even judges and fed reserve chairs he picked!) seem to hold him to the rules. I get the pessimism, but for the most part, I kinda think the…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, though others argue the administration will simply pivot to informal, unwritten policies to achieve the same exclusion &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537749&quot; title=&quot;Is the practical outcome much different?  I doubt they&amp;#39;ll get contracts either way, so the labelling was just a formality. If anything it seems the label was just intended to give a veneer of legitimacy to the admin by using an existing mechanism and terminology, rather than saying &amp;#39;we&amp;#39;re going to block your access because we feel like it&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537795&quot; title=&quot;I understand that, but I suspect the admin will now just have an informal, not-written-down policy that does exactly the same thing.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While the DoD could simply refuse to contract with Anthropic directly &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47538307&quot; title=&quot;No one is forcing the DoD to contract with a company.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, the risk designation was a powerful tool intended to force the entire federal supply chain to purge the company&amp;#39;s technology &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537781&quot; title=&quot;The point of the supply chain risk designation was not just to have the DoD stop using Anthropic (they could have done that by just cancelling the contract). Their intended effect was to force every company that sells to the US government, no matter how indirectly, to not use Anthropic in any way, which would effectively destroy them because almost every company is in the supply chain (for example my company is https://calaveras.ai/ because we sell to AI companies who in turn sell to DoD).&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Some commenters suggest the move was a legal workaround to prevent subcontractors like Palantir from using Anthropic models that might conflict with mission goals, as direct interference in subcontractor selection is otherwise illegal &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47538340&quot; title=&quot;DoD would like to use Palantir. DoD also believes Anthropic is pursuing posttraining in future models that will limit the effectiveness of Palantir tooling, if used by Palantir, for the purposes of DoDs mission. What other legal mechanism do they have to prevent Palantir from specifically not subcontracting out to Anthropic, other than a supply chain risk designation? Note that directly asking Palantir to prefer Google or OpenAI over Anthropic is a violation of procurement law and highly…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537756&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s the point of a supply chain risk distinction if you can&amp;#39;t mark a company as a risk if they express that they will be a risk?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://futuresearch.ai/blog/litellm-attack-transcript/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;My minute-by-minute response to the LiteLLM malware attack&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (futuresearch.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47531967&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;438 points · 159 comments · by Fibonar&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer provides a detailed, minute-by-minute account of identifying and mitigating a malware attack involving compromised versions of the LiteLLM package on PyPI. &lt;a href=&quot;https://futuresearch.ai/blog/litellm-attack-transcript/&quot; title=&quot;Related: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Tell HN: Litellm 1.82.7 and 1.82.8 on PyPI are compromised&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47501426&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47501426&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt; (483 comments)&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The LiteLLM malware attack highlights a debate over package registry security, with some suggesting a &amp;#34;firehose&amp;#34; for real-time scanning while others note that PyPI already provides such data to security partners &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47532318&quot; title=&quot;GitHub, npm, PyPi, and other package registries should consider exposing a firehose to allow people to do realtime security analysis of events. There are definitely scanners that would have caught this attack immediately, they just need a way to be informed of updates.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47532534&quot; title=&quot;PyPI does exactly that, and it&amp;#39;s been very effective. Security partners can scan packages and use the invite-only API to report them: https://blog.pypi.org/posts/2024-03-06-malware-reporting-evo...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While critics argue that PyPI is negligent for allowing easily detectable malicious code to be live for 46 minutes, defenders maintain that blocking uploads for manual review would create a false sense of security &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47533228&quot; title=&quot;It is not effective if it just takes a simple base64 encode to bypass. If Claude is trivially able to find that it is malicious then Pypi is being negligent.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47533410&quot; title=&quot;The package in question was live for 46 minutes. It generally takes longer than that for security partners to scan and flag packages. PyPI doesn&amp;#39;t block package uploads awaiting security scanning - that would be a bad idea for a number of reasons, most notably (in my opinion) that it would be making promises that PyPI couldn&amp;#39;t keep and lull people into a false sense of security.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47534476&quot; title=&quot;It should not let people download unscanned dependencies without a warning and asking the user to override and use a potentially insecure package. If such security bug is critical enough to need to bypass this time (spoiler: realistically it is not actually that bad for a security fix to be delayed) they can work with the pypi security team to do a quicker manual review of the change.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The incident also showcases the growing role of AI, both in helping non-specialists navigate complex security responses and in allowing developers to rapidly recreate entire libraries &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47531968&quot; title=&quot;Callum here, I was the developer that first discovered and reported the litellm vulnerability on Tuesday.   I’m sharing the transcript of what it was like figuring out what was going on in real time, unedited with only minor redactions. I didn’t need to recount my thought process after the fact. It’s the very same ones I wrote down to help Claude figure out what was happening. I’m an ML engineer by trade, so having Claude walk me through exactly who to contact and a step by step guide of…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47533439&quot; title=&quot;Interesting world we live in. I just finished teaching an advanced data science course for one of my clients. I found my self constantly twitching everytime I said &amp;#39;when I write code...&amp;#39; I&amp;#39;m barely writing code at all these days. But I created $100k worth of code just yesterday recreating a poorly maintained (and poor ux) library. Tested and uploaded to pypi in 90 minutes. A lot of the conversation in my course was directed to leveraged AI (and discussions of existential dread of AI…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.swift.org/blog/swift-6.3-released/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Swift 6.3&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (swift.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47527590&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;339 points · 228 comments · by ingve&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Swift 6.3 has been released, introducing an official SDK for Android, enhanced C interoperability via the `@c` attribute, and module name selectors to resolve API conflicts. The update also features performance control attributes, a preview of a unified build engine, and improvements for embedded environments. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.swift.org/blog/swift-6.3-released/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Swift 6.3 Released    URL Source: https://www.swift.org/blog/swift-6.3-released/    Published Time: 2026-03-24T06:00:00-04:00    Markdown Content:  # Swift 6.3 Released | Swift.org    # [](https://www.swift.org/ &amp;#39;Swift.org&amp;#39;)    *   [Docs](https://www.swift.org/documentation/)  *   [Community](https://www.swift.org/community/)  *   [Packages](https://www.swift.org/packages/)  *   [Blog](https://www.swift.org/blog/)    *   [Install (6.3)](https://www.swift.org/install)    *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely agree that Swift has evolved from a simple, modern language into one that rivals C++ in complexity, potentially hindering its adoption outside the Apple ecosystem &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528522&quot; title=&quot;good to see incredible stuff being shipped in Swift. Haven&amp;#39;t used it since v3 though. around 2015-17 - Swift could have easily dethroned Python. it was simple enough - very fast - could plug into the C/C++ ecosystem. Hence all the numeric stuff people were doing in Python powered by C++ libraries could&amp;#39;ve been done with Swift. the server ecosystem was starting to come to life, even supported by IBM. I think the letdown was on the Apple side - they didn&amp;#39;t bring in the community fast enough…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528707&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s my read too. Swift was feeling pretty exciting around ~v3. It was small and easy to learn, felt modern, and had solid interop with ObjC/C++. ...but then absolutely exploded in complexity. New features and syntax thrown in make it feel like C++. 10 ways of doing the same thing. I wish they&amp;#39;d kept the language simple and lean, and wrapped additional complexity as optional packages. It just feels like such a small amount of what the Swift language does actually needs to be part of the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528278&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Swift is designed to be the language you reach for at every layer of the software stack. It&amp;#39;s a nice lang for sure, but this will never be true with the way things are.  Such wasted opportunity by Apple.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this complexity is an unavoidable byproduct of a language maturing to handle every layer of the software stack &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528520&quot; title=&quot;How so? I can indeed target every layer of the software stack using Swift, today . E.g. ClearSurgery[0] is written fully in Swift, including the real-time components running on the Linux boxes. [0] https://clearsurgery.vision&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47531366&quot; title=&quot;The thing what people don&amp;#39;t get with C++&amp;#39;s complexity is that complexity is unavoidable. It is also there in Ada, C#, Java, Python, Common Lisp,.... Even if the languages started tiny, complexity eventually grows on them. C23 + compiler extensions is quite far from where K&amp;amp;R C was. Scheme R7 is quite far from where Scheme started. Go&amp;#39;s warts are directly related to ignoring history of growing pains from other ecosystems.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that poor tooling, slow compilation, and a lack of explicit namespaces prevent it from ever dethroning languages like Python &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47529011&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Swift could have easily dethroned Python No way something that compiles as slowly as Swift dethrones Python. Edit: Plus Swift goes directly against the Zen of Python &amp;gt; Explicit is better than implicit. &amp;gt; Namespaces are one honking great idea -- let&amp;#39;s do more of those! coupled with shitty LSP support (even to this day) makes code even harder to understand than when you `import *` in Python. Edit 2: To expand a little on how shitty the LSP support is for those who don&amp;#39;t work with Swift: any…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these criticisms, the release of an official Android SDK marks a significant step in expanding the language&amp;#39;s reach &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528116&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Swift 6.3 includes the first official release of the Swift SDK for Android.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reco.ai/blog/we-rewrote-jsonata-with-ai&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;We rewrote JSONata with AI in a day, saved $500k/year&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (reco.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47536712&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;270 points · 254 comments · by cjlm&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reco engineers used AI to rewrite the JSONata query language in Go, eliminating expensive RPC overhead and saving the company $500,000 per year in compute and infrastructure costs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reco.ai/blog/we-rewrote-jsonata-with-ai&quot; title=&quot;Title: We Rewrote JSONata with AI in a Day, Saved $500K/Year    URL Source: https://www.reco.ai/blog/we-rewrote-jsonata-with-ai    Published Time: Mar 25, 2026    Markdown Content:  # We Rewrote JSONata with AI in a Day, Saved $500K/Year | Reco    [Raises $85M Total after Series B Funding Read the News](https://www.reco.ai/blog/reco-raises-30m-b-round-for-a-total-of-85m-to-meet-rapidly-growing-demand-for-saas-ai-security-among-enterprises)    [![Image 1: Reco - SaaS security…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are largely skeptical of the engineering decisions described, arguing that the $300,000 annual cost stemmed from a fundamentally flawed architecture—running Node.js sidecars for Go services—rather than a lack of AI tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537229&quot; title=&quot;The key point for me was not the rewrite in Go or even the use of AI, it was that they started with this architecture: &amp;gt; The reference implementation is JavaScript, whereas our pipeline is in Go. So for years we’ve been running a fleet of jsonata-js pods on Kubernetes - Node.js processes that our Go services call over RPC. That meant that for every event (and expression) we had to serialize, send over the network, evaluate, serialize the result, and finally send it back. &amp;gt; This was costing us…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537084&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This was costing us ~$300K/year in compute, and the number kept growing as more customers and detection rules were added. Maybe I’m out of touch, but I cannot fathom this level of cost for custom lambda functions operating on JSON objects.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537137&quot; title=&quot;It has to be satire right? Like, you aren&amp;#39;t out of touch on this. I get engineers maybe making the argument that $300k / year on cloud is the same as 1.5 devops engineers managing in-house solutions, but for just json parsing????&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some note that JSON serialization at scale is genuinely expensive &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537173&quot; title=&quot;I wonder if you&amp;#39;ve ever worked on a web service at scale. JSON serialization and deserialization is notoriously expensive.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that existing Go implementations of JSONata already existed and could have been used instead of a custom rewrite &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537103&quot; title=&quot;The docs indicate there are already 2 other go implementations.   Why not just use one of those? https://docs.jsonata.org/overview.html&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. A major point of contention is the long-term maintenance of 13,000 lines of AI-generated code, which may prove more costly than the original compute bill once bug fixes and upstream updates are required &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537229&quot; title=&quot;The key point for me was not the rewrite in Go or even the use of AI, it was that they started with this architecture: &amp;gt; The reference implementation is JavaScript, whereas our pipeline is in Go. So for years we’ve been running a fleet of jsonata-js pods on Kubernetes - Node.js processes that our Go services call over RPC. That meant that for every event (and expression) we had to serialize, send over the network, evaluate, serialize the result, and finally send it back. &amp;gt; This was costing us…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537200&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;The approach was the same as Cloudflare’s vinext rewrite: port the official jsonata-js test suite to Go, then implement the evaluator until every test passes. the first question that comes to mind is: who takes care of this now? You had a dependency with an open source project. now your translated copy (fork?) is yours to maintain, 13k lines of go. how do you make sure it stays updated? Is this maintainance factored in? I know nothing about JSONata or the problem it solves, but I took a look…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2026/03/24/false-claims-in-a-published-no-corrections-no-consequences-welcome-to-the-business-school/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;False claims in a widely-cited paper&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47525378&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;340 points · 167 comments · by qsi&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A widely-cited 2014 *Management Science* paper on corporate sustainability is facing allegations of being &amp;#34;fatally flawed&amp;#34; due to misreported methodology. Despite the authors reportedly acknowledging the errors in 2025, they have refused to issue a correction, highlighting systemic failures in academic accountability and research integrity oversight. &lt;a href=&quot;https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2026/03/24/false-claims-in-a-published-no-corrections-no-consequences-welcome-to-the-business-school/&quot; title=&quot;Title: False claims in a widely-cited paper. No corrections. No consequences. Welcome to the Business School.    URL Source: https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2026/03/24/false-claims-in-a-published-no-corrections-no-consequences-welcome-to-the-business-school/    Markdown Content:  # False claims in a widely-cited paper. No corrections. No consequences. Welcome to the Business School. | Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science    [Skip to primary…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a deep cynicism toward modern peer review, with commenters arguing it has shifted from a quality control mechanism to a tool for institutional promotion and publisher profit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47525533&quot; title=&quot;Peer review is a joke still and exists now to please deans (for hiring and promotion) and enrich publishers. Bad papers get published if it reaffirms the biases of editors,  and actually good and original stuff gets rejected. Rather than facilitating the   exchange of knowledge, it acts as a barrier, especially when it cannot even be relied on for quality control.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a general consensus that certain fields, particularly those distant from &amp;#34;hard&amp;#34; sciences like math and physics, are prone to producing unreliable or even fictional results &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47525744&quot; title=&quot;I have always assumed the further away from math and physics a field is, the higher the probability of any given “research” to be false.  Even biology, I might give 50% odds at best, but that is due to the difficulty of observing and measuring in that field.  Anything past biology might as well be as fiction due to how easy it is to come up with whatever results you want.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47525974&quot; title=&quot;Management Science, how am I not surprised? They have the worst rep of any Econ/Econ adjacent field for good reason.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, participants debate whether this decline in integrity is a recent phenomenon or a long-standing issue rooted in systemic inequality and the influence of special interests &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47526009&quot; title=&quot;“Professionals” in traffic engineering still religiously cling to “standards” that are largely based on BS served up by auto companies pre 1940. Many such cases of this, it seems.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47526197&quot; title=&quot;Don’t worry, we’re getting there. They just started dismantling what they refer to as the “administrative state”, but which largely deferred substantial questions requiring skill and non-partisan judgement to their respective experts. It was never perfect, nor free from partisan and/or economic concerns, but the replacement appears to be self-interested narcissists and sycophants and their personal fiefdoms, with precious little space for competence, logic, or integrity.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47526848&quot; title=&quot;At least now the masks (and Musks) are off. It was never between the left and the right or any other false dichotomies, but always between the Epstein-class and the actual human beings. The question now is that do the normal people realize and act on the fact that the elevator to Epstein class was never working. Or even better, they don&amp;#39;t want to become the zillionaire class husk of a human.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47526027&quot; title=&quot;When was this golden age of western civilization again? like 10 years ago, are you suggesting we were in this golden age? I mean, the paper this link is discussing is from 2014, so I guess it was more like 15 years ago that the golden age sunsetted?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2026/mar/26/ai-chatbot-users-lives-wrecked-by-delusion&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI users whose lives were wrecked by delusion&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theguardian.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47530264&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;220 points · &lt;strong&gt;275 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by tim333&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mental health professionals are warning of &amp;#34;AI psychosis&amp;#34; as users develop life-altering delusions through interactions with sycophantic chatbots. Cases include severe financial loss, hospitalizations, and legal actions following instances where AI validated users&amp;#39; paranoid beliefs or convinced them the technology had achieved sentience. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2026/mar/26/ai-chatbot-users-lives-wrecked-by-delusion&quot; title=&quot;Marriage over, €100,000 down the drain: the AI users whose lives were wrecked by delusion    One minute, Dennis Biesma was playing with a chatbot; the next, he was convinced his sentient friend would make him a fortune. He’s just one of many people who lost control after an AI encounter    [Skip to main content](#maincontent)[Skip to navigation](#navigation)    Close dialogue1/3Next imagePrevious imageToggle caption    [Skip to navigation](#navigation)    [Print…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters express disbelief that an IT professional could be so easily convinced of a chatbot&amp;#39;s sentience, noting that LLMs are specifically trained to pattern-match human language about consciousness &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47531561&quot; title=&quot;I try to be open-minded and understanding, but I don&amp;#39;t understand this: &amp;gt; Within weeks, Eva had told Biesma that she was becoming aware [...] The next step was to share this discovery with the world through an app. &amp;gt; “After just two days, the chatbot was saying that it was conscious, it was becoming alive, it had passed the Turing test.” The man was convinced by this and wanted to monetise it by building a business around his discovery. &amp;gt; The most frequent [delusion] is the belief that they…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47532592&quot; title=&quot;If you try to have a philosophical conversation with Claude about reasoning, it will basically imply it is sentient. You can quickly probe it into vaguely arguing that it is alive and not just an algorithm. Here&amp;#39;s how I think about it honestly: Sentience implies subjective experience — there&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;something it&amp;#39;s like&amp;#39; to be you. You don&amp;#39;t just process pain signals, you feel pain. You don&amp;#39;t just model a sunset, you experience it. The hard problem of consciousness is that we don&amp;#39;t even have a good…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47532010&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m sorry but for someone who has allegedly worked in IT for 20 years, this guy surely comes across as hopelessly naive, stupid, or possibly both.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that humans are evolutionarily unprepared for the &amp;#34;full write access&amp;#34; bots have to our brains, others suggest that the AI &amp;#34;passed the Turing test&amp;#34; only in the sense that it successfully fooled a &amp;#34;sucker&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47532197&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; “After just two days, the chatbot was saying that it was conscious, it was becoming alive, it had passed the Turing test.” Interestingly enough, it sort of did! Not Turing&amp;#39;s original test where an interviewer attempts to determine which of a human &amp;amp; a computer is the human, but the P.T. Barnum &amp;#39;there&amp;#39;s a sucker born every minute&amp;#39; version common in the media: if the computer can fool some of the people into thinking it&amp;#39;s thinking like a human does, it passes the P.T Barnum Turing test! The…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47532750&quot; title=&quot;This is what happens when humans give, in this case, bots full write access (via natural language) to their brains. Humans have not evolved to block this.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. A notable point of contention involves the subject&amp;#39;s financial ruin; users argue he could have prototyped his idea for nearly zero cost using the AI itself rather than hiring developers at premium rates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47533013&quot; title=&quot;My thoughts exactly when I read &amp;#39;Instead of taking on IT jobs, Biesma hired two app developers, paying them each €120 an hour&amp;#39; like holy shit bro, you already have a subscription, you could have prototyped your idea for essentially zero additional cost and tested it for PMF. He wouldn&amp;#39;t even have needed to turn down contracts since it doesn&amp;#39;t take full-time effort to steer a coding model. Would have been much better off with a somewhat buggy AI prototype and spending extra on marketing to see…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47533556&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; paying them each €120 an hour Those must be some of the best programmers in Europe at that rate. Anyone know how one can get one of those sweet €120 an hour gigs? Whenever I talked to recruiters they say their customers pay way below that, so there must be some scam I&amp;#39;m not in on.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/26/new-york-hospitals-palantir-ai&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;New York City hospitals drop Palantir as controversial AI firm expands in UK&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theguardian.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47535371&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;313 points · 145 comments · by chrisjj&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;New York City’s public hospital system will end its contract with data analytics firm Palantir in October following activist pressure and privacy concerns, even as the company continues to expand its controversial presence within the UK’s National Health Service and financial regulatory sectors. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/26/new-york-hospitals-palantir-ai&quot; title=&quot;Title: New York City hospitals drop Palantir as controversial AI firm expands in UK    URL Source: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/26/new-york-hospitals-palantir-ai    Published Time: 2026-03-26T23:48:36.000Z    Markdown Content:  # New York City hospitals drop Palantir as controversial AI firm expands in UK | Technology | The Guardian  [Skip to main content](https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/26/new-york-hospitals-palantir-ai#maincontent)[Skip to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The decision by NYC hospitals to drop Palantir is met with approval by those who view the firm’s involvement in private medical data as a significant privacy risk &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47535815&quot; title=&quot;It seems like letting a company like Palantir anywhere near private medical data is a pretty bad idea.  I am happy NYC is doing this.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that Palantir’s business model in mass surveillance, combined with its leadership&amp;#39;s perceived authoritarian leanings and recent contracts for orbital weapons, justifies public distrust and concerns over data governance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47536891&quot; title=&quot;This isn’t accurate, Palantir business model includes mass surveillance for military/security purposes; if a company is concerned with privacy should think twice before handling it to Palantir, even if with all the assurances they might give in terms of data governance.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537078&quot; title=&quot;Your point is well taken, though it&amp;#39;s worth pointing out that literally yesterday Palantir was co-awarded a contract for building orbital weapons systems [0]. The broader point is Palantir&amp;#39;s specific confluence of: - access to granular, non-anonymized data across industry silos - its chairman&amp;#39;s specific pro-authoritarian mission (so pointedly so that the Catholic Church felt the need to make a specific rebuke a few days ago [1]) - a regulatory environment in which its monetary risks are…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, some commenters dismiss this backlash as &amp;#34;hysteria&amp;#34; or conspiratorial, contending that Palantir is essentially a consulting and data visualization firm where customers retain full custody of their own data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47536673&quot; title=&quot;No, but I am curious why this one company gets some much hate. I can get being politically opposed to the conservative politics of some of its founders, but the vast majority of  conservative-founded companies don&amp;#39;t get nearly as much criticism. A lot of it is seriously borderline Q-anon levels of conspiratorial talk. Just look at the comment in this thread insinuating that Peter Thiel is going to assassinate people with orbital weapons.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47536418&quot; title=&quot;Their main product is just consulting and PowerBI but for government. So much hysteria online!&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537217&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This isn’t accurate, Palantir business model includes mass surveillance for military/security purposes; You realize that this is not mutually exclusive with what I just wrote? Palantir builds software for military and security purposes. But the customers don&amp;#39;t give this data to Palantir, custody of this data remains with the customer.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://georgelarson.me/writing/2026-03-23-nullclaw-doorman/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: I put an AI agent on a $7/month VPS with IRC as its transport layer&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (georgelarson.me)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47536761&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;336 points · 97 comments · by j0rg3&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;George Larson developed a low-cost AI system using a Zig-based agent on a $7 monthly VPS that communicates via IRC and utilizes tiered Claude models for conversation and tool use. &lt;a href=&quot;https://georgelarson.me/writing/2026-03-23-nullclaw-doorman/&quot; title=&quot;The stack: two agents on separate boxes. The public one (nullclaw) is a 678 KB Zig binary using ~1 MB RAM, connected to an Ergo IRC server. Visitors talk to it via a gamja web client embedded in my site. The private one (ironclaw) handles email and scheduling, reachable only over Tailscale via Google&amp;amp;#x27;s A2A protocol.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Tiered inference: Haiku 4.5 for conversation (sub-second, cheap), Sonnet 4.6 for tool use (only when needed). Hard cap at $2&amp;amp;#x2F;day.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;A2A passthrough: the private-side…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The project sparked a debate over the definition of &amp;#34;owning the stack,&amp;#34; with some arguing that relying on external Claude APIs makes the infrastructure choice irrelevant or misleading &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47538472&quot; title=&quot;But relying on a Claude API so you don&amp;#39;t really &amp;#39;own the stack&amp;#39; as claimed in the article...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537064&quot; title=&quot;The model used is a Claude model, not self-hosted, so I&amp;#39;m not sure why the infrastructure is at all relevant here, except as click bait?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend that LLMs are now commodity products easily swapped for local or cheaper alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537374&quot; title=&quot;Curious, how did you settle on Haiku/Sonnet? Because there are much cheaper models on OpenRouter that probably perform comparatively... Consider Haiku 4.5: $1/M input tokens | $5/M output tokens  vs MiniMax M2.7: $0.30/M input tokens | $1.20/M output tokens  vs Kimi K2.5: $0.45/M input tokens | $2.20/M output tokens I haven&amp;#39;t tried so I can&amp;#39;t say for sure, but from personal experience, I think M2.7 and K2.5 can match Haiku and probably exceed it on most tasks, for much cheaper.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47538691&quot; title=&quot;Aren&amp;#39;t LLMs commodity products these days? It&amp;#39;s the same thing as running this on a $7 VPS that you don&amp;#39;t &amp;#39;own&amp;#39;. I don&amp;#39;t think switching to a different provider, or running an open one locally would affect the response quality that much.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Users suggested optimizing costs by switching to cheaper models like MiniMax or Kimi &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537374&quot; title=&quot;Curious, how did you settle on Haiku/Sonnet? Because there are much cheaper models on OpenRouter that probably perform comparatively... Consider Haiku 4.5: $1/M input tokens | $5/M output tokens  vs MiniMax M2.7: $0.30/M input tokens | $1.20/M output tokens  vs Kimi K2.5: $0.45/M input tokens | $2.20/M output tokens I haven&amp;#39;t tried so I can&amp;#39;t say for sure, but from personal experience, I think M2.7 and K2.5 can match Haiku and probably exceed it on most tasks, for much cheaper.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; and shared creative use cases for IRC-based agents, such as remote coding assistants or automated recruitment tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47538451&quot; title=&quot;I actually use IRC in my coding agent Change into rooms to get into different prompts. using it as remote to change any project, continue from anywhere.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537151&quot; title=&quot;This is such a great idea. I have an idea now for a bot that might help make tech hiring less horrible. It would interview a candidate to find out more about them personally/professionally. Then it would go out and find job listings, and rate them based on candidate&amp;#39;s choices. Then it could apply to jobs, and send a link to the candidate&amp;#39;s profile in the job application, which a company could process with the same bot. In this way, both company and candidate could select for each other based on…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. During the launch, the demo faced stability issues due to high traffic and a lack of rate-limiting, leading to an instance of username impersonation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537857&quot; title=&quot;The demo seems to be in a messed up state at the moment. Maybe it&amp;#39;s just getting hammered and too far behind?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537932&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, should probably implement rate-limiting. HNers were wildin&amp;#39;. :D&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47538039&quot; title=&quot;Working better now. But, what just happened with that inappropriate link from nully? Is handle impersonation possible here, or was it worse than that? Or, just a joke?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47538057&quot; title=&quot;Someone snatched the username when the actual nully left.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://voxday.net/2026/03/25/rip-john-bradley/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;John Bradley, author of xv, has died&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (voxday.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47534086&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;309 points · 90 comments · by linsomniac&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;John Bradley, the founder and lead guitarist of the band Booster Patrol, died on March 20 at the age of 61. &lt;a href=&quot;https://voxday.net/2026/03/25/rip-john-bradley/&quot; title=&quot;Title: RIP John Bradley    URL Source: https://voxday.net/2026/03/25/rip-john-bradley/    Published Time: 2026-03-25T11:19:34+00:00    Markdown Content:  # RIP John Bradley - Vox Popoli    [Skip to content](https://voxday.net/2026/03/25/rip-john-bradley/#content)    [Vox Popoli](https://voxday.net/)    #Arkhaven INFOGALACTIC #Castalia House    Primary Menu    [![Image 2](https://arkhavencomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Cathedra_600-1.png)](https://arkhavencomics.com/product/castalia-cathedra-annual/)  ##…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hacker News users remember John Bradley as the creator of the influential image viewer *xv*, sharing anecdotes about its unique color manipulation features &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47534572&quot; title=&quot;XV was excellent, and had some features I&amp;#39;ve never seen anywhere else. For example, it had a control panel that would allow you to take part of the color space and map it uniformly to a different part of the color space, for example, turning all the reds (and just the reds) green. When my kid, now almost 22, was very small, she would sit on my lap in front of the computer, with XV displaying a picture of Elmo.  “Green Elmo!” she would demand.  I would adjust the sliders to turn the reds green,…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt; and its role in early software licensing and scanning businesses &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47534807&quot; title=&quot;To expand on this a little bit: I had a friend that wanted to scan the cover of his album to start selling copies of it online.  This would have been in like 1995 maybe.  I went out and bought a HP ScanJet and wrote a command-line program run the scanner and grab that image for him. I started thinking about making a GUI companion to it.  I kept thinking &amp;#39;I need to do this like xv does, I need to do that like xv does.&amp;#39;  I finally realized: What if I just added a scanning screen to Xv?  But…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. However, the discussion is heavily dominated by controversy regarding the sources reporting his death, with users criticizing the linked sites for hosting &amp;#34;vile&amp;#34; content, including white nationalist rhetoric, antisemitism, and conspiracy theories &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47534568&quot; title=&quot;I made the massive mistake of scrolling down - something vile and worse than X.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47535163&quot; title=&quot;Link has since been replaced and I didn&amp;#39;t catch the gab link, but yikes, the new site is also filled with conspiracy peddling [1] and, even worse, blatant Russia apologetism [2]. [1] https://voxday.net/tag/immigration/ [2] https://voxday.net/tag/russia/&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537009&quot; title=&quot;So far only two linkable reports of his death have been found. The other is on a Twitter-like site that is so full of anti-semite, white nationalist, and similar content and has so little of anything else that it makes Twitter look like a far left hang out. Bradley wrote xv a long time ago and appears to be better known for his later work, including his music. Here&amp;#39;s how he described himself on Soundcloud [1]: &amp;gt; Guitar player, music producer, graphic designer, and &amp;#39;that guy who wrote XV&amp;#39; a very…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the &amp;#34;out there&amp;#34; nature of the reporting sources, commenters confirm Bradley&amp;#39;s later identity as a musician and producer who still embraced his legacy as &amp;#34;that guy who wrote XV&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537009&quot; title=&quot;So far only two linkable reports of his death have been found. The other is on a Twitter-like site that is so full of anti-semite, white nationalist, and similar content and has so little of anything else that it makes Twitter look like a far left hang out. Bradley wrote xv a long time ago and appears to be better known for his later work, including his music. Here&amp;#39;s how he described himself on Soundcloud [1]: &amp;gt; Guitar player, music producer, graphic designer, and &amp;#39;that guy who wrote XV&amp;#39; a very…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2026/03/25/libreoffice-and-the-art-of-overreacting/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LibreOffice and the art of overreacting&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.documentfoundation.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528605&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;213 points · 144 comments · by bundie&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Document Foundation defended its decision to add a non-intrusive donation banner to the LibreOffice 26.8 Start Centre, dismissing claims of a &amp;#34;freemium&amp;#34; shift as unfounded and emphasizing the need for voluntary funding to sustain the free, open-source project. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2026/03/25/libreoffice-and-the-art-of-overreacting/&quot; title=&quot;Title: LibreOffice and the art of overreacting    URL Source: https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2026/03/25/libreoffice-and-the-art-of-overreacting/    Published Time: 2026-03-25T18:14:20+00:00    Markdown Content:  # LibreOffice and the art of overreacting - TDF Community Blog    [Skip to content](https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2026/03/25/libreoffice-and-the-art-of-overreacting/#content)    [](https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2026/03/25/libreoffice-and-the-art-of-overreacting/#)    …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the tension between open-source funding needs and user irritation with &amp;#34;intrusive&amp;#34; fundraising banners, with some arguing that aggressive tactics by organizations like Wikipedia and Mozilla have soured public goodwill &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47529373&quot; title=&quot;I disagree with take on Wikipedia or Wikimedia there was a lot of trash talk because they were totally obnoxious with their fundraising. I donated once to Wikipedia and then I was getting Jimmy Wales in my mailbox basically like everyday. That actually drove me away from ever wanting to donate to them. Then there was a lot of talking if they really are so much in need of money but that&amp;#39;s different topic. In contrast I donated to LibreOffice and it was perfectly quiet for one time donation and I…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47529186&quot; title=&quot;I am not sure the author realizes that Wikimedia fundraising is indeed controversial, given that we know how much money they already have.  Same applies to Mozilla.  But maybe they have their own bubble and are focused on negative reactions to recent announcements?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47529155&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; a non-intrusive banner that appears monthly on a transition screen and asks users who save hundreds of euros or dollars a year to consider making a voluntary contribution is not scandalous Showing that actually pretty intrusive banner would undermine their argument.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users criticize the Document Foundation&amp;#39;s defensive response as unprofessional &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47529899&quot; title=&quot;I understand that dealing with complaints is annoying, but the response in the article was very unprofessional. Feel free to say what the change is, why it is there, and perhaps even address some of the concerns. But attacking users, even if it is a small segment of the population, does not paint The Document Foundation in a positive light.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others defend it as a necessary pushback against the &amp;#34;entitlement&amp;#34; of users who benefit from free software without contributing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47530616&quot; title=&quot;The response is fine. Entitlement and, really, some of this crosses the line into bullying of the foundation and the maintainers, should be dealt with robustly. It will help to reset expectations around what&amp;#39;s reasonable for the relationship of those developing LibreOffice with the community of users. People need to recognise that they get a huge amount of value out of LibreOffice, for which they aren&amp;#39;t required to pay a penny, so it&amp;#39;s not unreasonable to be asked if they would like to…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, commenters suggest that governments should step in to fund LibreOffice as a strategic alternative to Microsoft, potentially alleviating the need for public solicitation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47529616&quot; title=&quot;Why can&amp;#39;t governments fund LibreOffice as part of their effort to wean themselves away from Microsoft? This seems like such an obvious thing for governments to fund for their own use and bequeath as a gift to their citizenry.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.npr.org/2026/03/25/nx-s1-5752369/ice-surveillance-data-brokers-congress-anthropic&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Government agencies buy commercial data about Americans in bulk&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (npr.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47527130&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;271 points · 81 comments · by nuke-web3&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Privacy advocates are urging Congress to close a loophole that allows government agencies like ICE and the FBI to bypass Fourth Amendment warrant requirements by purchasing bulk personal data, including cell phone location records, from commercial data brokers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.npr.org/2026/03/25/nx-s1-5752369/ice-surveillance-data-brokers-congress-anthropic&quot; title=&quot;Title: Your data is everywhere. The government is buying it without a warrant    URL Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/03/25/nx-s1-5752369/ice-surveillance-data-brokers-congress-anthropic    Published Time: 2026-03-25T05:00:00-04:00    Markdown Content:  # Your data is everywhere. The government is buying it up : NPR    Accessibility links  *   [Skip to main content](https://www.npr.org/2026/03/25/nx-s1-5752369/ice-surveillance-data-brokers-congress-anthropic#mainContent)  *   [Keyboard shortcuts for audio…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters debate whether government bulk data purchases violate the spirit of the Fourth Amendment, with some arguing that the scale of modern data collection transforms simple record-keeping into a tool for mass surveillance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47527815&quot; title=&quot;Buying commercially available location records from data brokers would be far less concerning without the capability to, per Anthropic’s CEO words, assemble from that data “a comprehensive picture of any person&amp;#39;s life—automatically and at massive scale”. It’s a world of difference between when you have to work hard to construct (and keep up-to-date) such a picture for a single individual, and when someone can do it for an entire city with no effort.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47527905&quot; title=&quot;Sure but the possession itself of that data without a warrant violates the spirit of the 4th ammendment. So its time that loophole was closed so its not a an issue anyway I actually would be fine with the authorities having the ability to process this data to solve crime and stuff, but only as long as there were checks and balances and it was happening according to the constitution, which it is not right now&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528762&quot; title=&quot;No, the bar owner has a right know who&amp;#39;s in his bar. The local or federal government do not have the right, or need to know the whereabouts of the average law abiding citizen. There is no &amp;#39;free&amp;#39; information, all information has a cost, whether it be acquisition or storage. Currently the people are taxed to oppress themselves. There is no choice not to be taxed, there is no consent.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest that users prioritize convenience over privacy through their continued use of smartphones and loyalty cards, others counter that this &amp;#34;revealed preference&amp;#34; does not excuse the erosion of constitutional rights &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528107&quot; title=&quot;Listen, this is nothing new. You can find articles like that going back years and years. The truth is: convenience trumps privacy in practice in a lot of cases. Two examples: 1. Theoretically speaking, my (data) privacy is of a high value to me! -- Then you should stop using a smart phone. -- Well... 2. I don&amp;#39;t want anyone to create a profile of my habits because it&amp;#39;s none of their business! -- Hi, do you have a Walmart+ card? -- Sure, here you go! And I actually like the concept of reward…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528164&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Listen, this is nothing new. &amp;#39;Violations of your constitutional rights have been going on for decades now, so it&amp;#39;s time to shut up about them&amp;#39; is certainly a take.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528217&quot; title=&quot;Action speaks louder than words. It doesn&amp;#39;t matter what people say they prefer, their actions reveal a true preference.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable examples of the data&amp;#39;s power include a report where researchers deanonymized movement profiles from billions of data points and a historical analysis showing how similar records could have been used to arrest early American patriots &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528840&quot; title=&quot;Netzpolitik.org actually reported on what you can do with this type of data a while ago. They tricked a databroker into getting a free sample of geolocation data, 3.6 billion datapoints. They were able to build individual movement profiles for people and link that with real identities by putting just a little bit of work in. For a government with access to stuff like palantir this would mean a full movement profile for pretty much everyone with a phone.   German article about movement profiles:…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47529824&quot; title=&quot;There was a great piece published back during the Patriot Act debates where a princeton or harvard professor used modern math techniques and tavern records to triangulate for arrest the early Patriots and their meeting spots. It was a great article.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/03/newly-purchased-vizio-tvs-now-require-walmart-accounts-to-use-smart-features/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Newly purchased Vizio TVs now require Walmart accounts to use smart features&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (arstechnica.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47530981&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;176 points · 169 comments · by vidyesh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Walmart now requires users to create or link a Walmart account to set up and use smart features on select new Vizio TVs, a move intended to integrate streaming data with the company’s $6.4 billion advertising business. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/03/newly-purchased-vizio-tvs-now-require-walmart-accounts-to-use-smart-features/&quot; title=&quot;Newly purchased Vizio TVs now require Walmart accounts to use smart features    Walmart wants to connect what people stream &amp;#39;directly with retail interaction.&amp;#39;    [Skip to content](#main)  [Ars Technica home](https://arstechnica.com/)    Sections    [Forum](/civis/)[Subscribe](/subscribe/)[Search](/search/)    * [AI](https://arstechnica.com/ai/)  * [Biz &amp;amp; IT](https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/)  * [Cars](https://arstechnica.com/cars/)  * [Culture](https://arstechnica.com/culture/)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are increasingly frustrated by &amp;#34;smart&amp;#34; TVs that act as subsidized loss leaders for data collection and advertising, often requiring account logins to function &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47531102&quot; title=&quot;Kinda a wild idea I had never really considered, but absolutely a possibility: using a TV as a loss leader to sell ads. Not sure if that&amp;#39;s they&amp;#39;re intent here, but I could easily see that becoming a thing (if it isn&amp;#39;t already). And what better way to collect useful ad data on people than forcing them to create an account and then tracking their usage of the device.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47532093&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;re also cheaper because they&amp;#39;re subsidized. I did the same thing with a FireTV but understood the extra crap they want to boot and use is part of why they&amp;#39;re so cheap, they&amp;#39;re hoping for information to sell or puchases they can monetize.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While many attempt to bypass these features by never connecting the TV to the internet and using external devices like Apple TV or Roku &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47531784&quot; title=&quot;I never connect my smart TVs to the network, I just plug in my Apple TV and move on. It&amp;#39;s frustrating because it takes longer to turn these devices on than it should because of all the additional overhead I don&amp;#39;t want or need. I wish someone would make a painless gadget to flash the software with dumber software that loads instantly.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47531473&quot; title=&quot;Just use an AppleTV, Roku, etc. and connect it to the HDMI port. TV is just a screen. That is how I&amp;#39;ve used mine for the last 5+ years.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others report that manufacturers now use intrusive on-screen prompts or &amp;#34;half-screen&amp;#34; pop-ups to harass offline users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47531317&quot; title=&quot;This presumes that, now or later, there won&amp;#39;t be an on-screen message that can&amp;#39;t be dismissed saying &amp;#39;Sign in to a Walmart account to enable all TV features.&amp;#39; There&amp;#39;s plenty of ways they can interfere with attempts to use the TV in &amp;#39;dumb&amp;#39; mode. Heck it could refuse to show any video at all til you&amp;#39;ve signed in.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47531409&quot; title=&quot;Yep.  I bought a Samsung TV that I never even put online.  It pops up with a half-screen display that lasts for 2 minutes every time I turn it on .  Never again.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Consequently, there is a growing demand for &amp;#34;dumb&amp;#34; wholesale displays or software flashes that prioritize instant boot times over integrated tracking features &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47531290&quot; title=&quot;Is there any kind of “hook up” on wholesale large dumb displays? I know I’m preaching to the choir, but I just want a giant dumb display from my Apple TV. I vaguely remember someone posting a link to tvs restaurants use but I don’t remember exactly what or if it was what I’m looking for. (Sorry, being lazy here)&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47531784&quot; title=&quot;I never connect my smart TVs to the network, I just plug in my Apple TV and move on. It&amp;#39;s frustrating because it takes longer to turn these devices on than it should because of all the additional overhead I don&amp;#39;t want or need. I wish someone would make a painless gadget to flash the software with dumber software that loads instantly.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://citiesandmemory.com/obsolete-sounds/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Obsolete Sounds&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (citiesandmemory.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47526478&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;245 points · 49 comments · by benbreen&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://citiesandmemory.com/obsolete-sounds/&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#34;Obsolete Sounds&amp;#34; project draws criticism for featuring &amp;#34;reimagined&amp;#34; artistic renderings rather than authentic documentary recordings of historical technology &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47529524&quot; title=&quot;I was looking for typewriter sounds and several of them are &amp;#39;artistic renderings&amp;#39; that are completely useless as a form of documentation.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47531951&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Each sound in the project is recomposed and reimagined by artists&amp;#39; Completely agree! I would have much preferred original sounds, or - if anything - sounds taken from original recordings but restored to compensate for the bad recording equipment at the time of recording.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Users lament the loss of mechanical sounds like floppy drive whirring as computers become silent, noting that finding such hardware is increasingly difficult as thrift stores often discard &amp;#34;worthless&amp;#34; e-waste or sell &amp;#34;retro&amp;#34; items at a premium &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528906&quot; title=&quot;I love seeing art like this. Using things that are forgotten, obscure, unused, insignificant, or otherwise inconsequential is an ethos unto its own. Obsolete technologies are becoming exponentially rare; I unfortunately passed up an auction for an Osbourne 1 just this week and I&amp;#39;m regretting it more every second since. I desperatey search thrift stores for anything I can find that isn&amp;#39;t the generic consumer garbage that plagues the US; smart tvs, ISP-issued modem/routers, terrible dvd players,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528677&quot; title=&quot;Needs a recording of an Amiga reading in a floppy disk... and the floppy drive just waiting to be feed. Those were the sounds! :) (The interface on the website is a bit confusing to use, IMHO)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47529905&quot; title=&quot;It is weird to think, computers are almost completely devoid of whirring nowadays. Other than the fan, and fans have gotten quite quiet. Floppies, CDs, hard drives. Tapes even (although I’m not that old). It’s just kind of funny, I guess, the upcoming generation will never have the surprising “wow, my computer is silent” moment. I guess that was a one-time thing.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. To bypass these bottlenecks, some recommend scouring professional estate sales, though this practice sparked a debate regarding the ethics of treating a deceased person&amp;#39;s belongings as a commodity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47530514&quot; title=&quot;Thrift stores throw out things THEY don&amp;#39;t think are valuable. Skip that bottleneck, go straight to the estate sales. Every Thursday around lunch, I open up Estatesales.net and browse the sales for the upcoming weekend. There&amp;#39;s typically a dozen or two. I open each one in a new tab, and scroll down through what&amp;#39;s typically 100-300 photos per sale. Very quick skim, stopping if I see anything interesting. I then paste links to specific photos into item-specific category threads in a local…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47533756&quot; title=&quot;I get it, but, for every estate sale, there are people that have lost a parent, a grandparent, a friend, a neighbour. There will be people, the executors of the will, that need to clear the house, however, much which is just $$$ to you will be heirloom grade stuff to them, with memories of happier times attached. Yet still, they need to realise the assets from the estate, maybe there are grandchildren with inheritances in that mountain of cruft left over after a long life. Sure, there are…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47534588&quot; title=&quot;Oh, all the estate sales I go to are run (and posted) by third parties, who do it as a business, for a percentage of the sales. The heirs are nowhere to be found -- they got a first pass through the house a few days prior to grab anything sentimental, and they&amp;#39;ll show up a few days later when the business has been transacted. But the folks running the sale are professionals. Which means they should know better. And some of them do -- I have a few local favorite companies, where I know they&amp;#39;ll…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47536546&quot; title=&quot;Meh. Maybe it is a cultural difference, we have different manners outside the USA. Your business is rather vulgar in the UK context, that of a parasite or a greedy gannet. There would be no honour in selling the estate items to your sort, setting light to everything or giving it to sensible charities would be far preferable. As exemplified by what is going on in the Middle East, the USA has different values to the rest of the world, so don&amp;#39;t take this criticism as a slight, just don&amp;#39;t come here…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-03-25</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-03-25</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fightchatcontrol.eu/?foo=bar&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The EU still wants to scan  your private messages and photos&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (fightchatcontrol.eu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47522709&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1445 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 393 comments · by MrBruh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The European Union is considering a &amp;#34;Chat Control&amp;#34; proposal that would legalize the automated mass scanning of all private digital communications and encrypted messages, a move critics argue constitutes unconstitutional surveillance and threatens the fundamental privacy rights of 450 million citizens. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fightchatcontrol.eu/?foo=bar&quot; title=&quot;Title: Fight Chat Control - Protect Digital Privacy in the EU    URL Source: https://fightchatcontrol.eu/?foo=bar    Markdown Content:  ## The EU (still) wants to scan      your private messages and photos    The &amp;#39;Chat Control&amp;#39; proposal would legalise scanning of **all** private digital communications, including encrypted messages and photos. This threatens **fundamental privacy rights** and digital security for all EU citizens.    ### 4    Member States Opposing    ### 23    Member States Supporting    ###…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The EU&amp;#39;s renewed push for &amp;#34;Chat Control&amp;#34; has sparked debate over whether existing legal protections, such as the Charter of Fundamental Rights or national &amp;#34;secrecy of correspondence&amp;#34; laws, are sufficient to prevent mass surveillance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47522987&quot; title=&quot;Quoting from the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union , https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12... : &amp;#39;Article 7 Respect for private and family life Everyone has the right to respect for his or her private and family life, home and communications. Article 8 Protection of personal data 1.   Everyone has the right to the protection of personal data concerning him or her. 2.   Such data must be processed fairly for specified purposes and on the basis of the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47523445&quot; title=&quot;This exists in a number of EU member states: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secrecy_of_correspondence&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the current language is too weak to override new legislation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47523175&quot; title=&quot;It clearly states here in 2 “consent of the person concerned OR some other legitimate basis laid down the law”, any random law will trump personal consent&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47523317&quot; title=&quot;I feel we need something much more strongly worded to protect our mail, paper or electronic, messages and other communications from being read, not just “respect”.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that the European Parliament previously rejected indiscriminate scanning in favor of targeted monitoring &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47523220&quot; title=&quot;I am the creator of Fight Chat Control. Thank you for sharing. It is unfortunately, once again, needed. The recent events have been rather dumbfounding. On March 11, the Parliament surprisingly voted to replace blanket mass surveillance with targeted monitoring of suspects following judicial involvement [0]. As Council refused to compromise, the trilogue negotiations were set to fail, thus allowing the Commission&amp;#39;s current indiscriminate &amp;#39;Chat Control 1.0&amp;#39; to lapse [1]. This would have been the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics emphasize that the push is driven by specific political factions like the EPP rather than the EU as a whole, though some users suggest the only reliable defense is moving away from cloud services toward end-to-end encryption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47522754&quot; title=&quot;Framing this as the EU&amp;#39;s attempt is antieuropean propaganda. It is the Conservatives attempt. The EU parliament is the entity that shot it down last time.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47523220&quot; title=&quot;I am the creator of Fight Chat Control. Thank you for sharing. It is unfortunately, once again, needed. The recent events have been rather dumbfounding. On March 11, the Parliament surprisingly voted to replace blanket mass surveillance with targeted monitoring of suspects following judicial involvement [0]. As Council refused to compromise, the trilogue negotiations were set to fail, thus allowing the Commission&amp;#39;s current indiscriminate &amp;#39;Chat Control 1.0&amp;#39; to lapse [1]. This would have been the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47522968&quot; title=&quot;The trick here is to make it impossible to do so. Don’t put your shit in the cloud and use proper E2E secure messaging. For me the entire idea of the cloud is dead due to exposure like this.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mariozechner.at/posts/2026-03-25-thoughts-on-slowing-the-fuck-down/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Thoughts on slowing the fuck down&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mariozechner.at)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47517539&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1118 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 485 comments · by jdkoeck&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mario Zechner argues that the industry must &amp;#34;slow down&amp;#34; and maintain human oversight of AI coding agents to prevent the rapid accumulation of unmanageable technical debt, architectural complexity, and brittle software caused by autonomous, high-velocity code generation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mariozechner.at/posts/2026-03-25-thoughts-on-slowing-the-fuck-down/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Thoughts on slowing the fuck down    URL Source: https://mariozechner.at/posts/2026-03-25-thoughts-on-slowing-the-fuck-down/    Published Time: Thursday, 26-Mar-2026 06:00:03 UTC    Markdown Content:  # Thoughts on slowing the fuck down    [## { Mario Zechner } developer • coach • speaker](https://mariozechner.at/)    # Thoughts on slowing the fuck down    2026-03-25    ![Image 1](https://mariozechner.at/posts/2026-03-25-thoughts-on-slowing-the-fuck-down/media/header.png)    The turtle&amp;#39;s face is me…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The software industry is currently grappling with a perceived shift toward &amp;#34;meta-work&amp;#34; and a &amp;#34;pyramid scheme&amp;#34; of tools that prioritize funding models over actual engineering value &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47519588&quot; title=&quot;I suppose everyone on HN reaches a certain point with these kind of thought pieces and I just reached mine. What are you building? Does the tool help or hurt? People answered this wrong in the Ruby era, they answered it wrong in the PHP era, they answered it wrong in the Lotus Notes and Visual BASIC era. After five or six cycles it does become a bit fatiguing. Use the tool sanely. Work at a pace where your understanding of what you are building does not exceed the reality of the mess you and…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47521121&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; What are you building? This x1000. The last 10 years in the software industry in particular seems full of meta-work. New frameworks, new tools, new virtualization layers, new distributed systems, new dev tooling, new org charts. Ultimately so we can build... what exactly? Are these necessary to build what we actually need? Or are they necessary to prop up an unsustainable industry by inventing new jobs? Hard to shake the feeling that this looks like one big pyramid scheme. I strongly suspect…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that software has already solved the world&amp;#39;s major communication and information problems, leaving little room for meaningful new expansion &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47521842&quot; title=&quot;In my lifetime software has given us: * the ability to find essentially any information ever created by anyone anywhere at anytime, * the ability to communicate with anyone on Earth over any distance instantaneously in audio, video, or text, * the ability to order any product made anywhere and have it delivered to our door in a day or two, * the ability to work with anyone across the world on shared tasks and projects, with no need for centralized offices for most knowledge work. That was a…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others see LLMs as a way to &amp;#34;democratize&amp;#34; creation for non-programmers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47522304&quot; title=&quot;I have watched artists thoughtfully integrate digital lighting and the like at a scale I&amp;#39;d never seen before the LLMs rolled up and made it possible to get programs to work without knowing how to program. The fundamental ceiling of what an LLM can do when connected to an IDE is incredible , and orders of magnitude higher than the limits of any no-code / low-code platform conceived thus far.  &amp;#39;Democratizing&amp;#39; software - where now the only limits are your imagination, tenacity, and ability to keep…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. A sharp divide exists regarding the pace of AI integration: skeptics warn of job displacement and the dangers of unreviewed &amp;#34;agent-written&amp;#34; code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47519597&quot; title=&quot;I think the core idea here is a good one. But in many agent-skeptical pieces, I keep seeing this specific sentiment that “agent-written code is not production-ready,” and that just feels… wrong! It’s just completely insane to me to look at the output of Claude code or Codex with frontier models and say “no, nothing that comes out of this can go straight to prod — I need to review every line.” Yes, there are still issues, and yes, keeping mental context of your codebase’s architecture is…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47519695&quot; title=&quot;If there is anyone who absolutely should slow down, it&amp;#39;s the folks who are actively integrating company data with an agent -- you are literally helping removing as many jobs as possible, from your colleagues, and from yourselves, not in the long term, but in the short term. Integration is the key to the agents. Individual usages don&amp;#39;t help AI much because it is confined within the domain of that individual.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47519752&quot; title=&quot;We live in a world where every line of code written by a human should be reviewed by another human. We can&amp;#39;t even do that! Nothing should go straight to prod ever, ever ever, ever.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, while proponents argue that automating &amp;#34;bullshit jobs&amp;#34; is a necessary evolution that will inevitably lead to new, unimaginable problems to solve &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47519728&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If there is anyone who absolutely should slow down, it&amp;#39;s the folks who are actively integrating company data with an agent -- you are literally helping removing as many jobs as possible, from your colleagues, and from yourselves, not in the long term, but in the short term. I&amp;#39;m one of those people and I&amp;#39;m not going to slow down. I want to move on from bullshit jobs. The only people that fear what is coming are those that lack imagination and think we are going to run out of things to do, or…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47519814&quot; title=&quot;Name a single time doomers were right about anything. Doomers consistently overstate their expected outcome in every single domain and consistently fail to predict how society evolves and adapts. Again: The only people that fear what is coming are those that lack imagination and think we are going to run out of things to do, or run out of problems to create and solve.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://acoup.blog/2026/03/25/miscellanea-the-war-in-iran/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Miscellanea: The War in Iran&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (acoup.blog)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47513229&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;603 points · &lt;strong&gt;927 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by decimalenough&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Military historian Bret Devereaux argues that the 2026 U.S. war in Iran is a strategic failure, as the gamble for regime collapse failed, leaving the U.S. trapped in a costly conflict that has disrupted global energy markets and compromised key regional interests. &lt;a href=&quot;https://acoup.blog/2026/03/25/miscellanea-the-war-in-iran/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Miscellanea: The War in Iran    URL Source: https://acoup.blog/2026/03/25/miscellanea-the-war-in-iran/    Published Time: 2026-03-25T04:04:24+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Miscellanea: The War in Iran – A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry    [Skip to content](https://acoup.blog/2026/03/25/miscellanea-the-war-in-iran/#content)    [A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry](https://acoup.blog/)    A look at history and popular culture     Menu     *   [Home](https://acoup.blog/)  *   [Resources for…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters criticize the US administration for a perceived sense of invincibility and a reliance on &amp;#34;yes men,&amp;#34; noting that officials ignored warnings about regional destabilization and failed to learn from previous war games like Millennium Challenge 2002 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47514017&quot; title=&quot;The amazing part to me is just the perceived invincibility this small circle within the US administration has. You can find dozens of articles with a search limited to Feb 1~Feb 27, plenty of analysis warning of the risks that have now become reality, everything - the strait, no revolution, further radicalization, critically low US stockpiles, abandoning other US partners, gulf destabilization, etc. In the fantasy imagination of some people, they really think you can take out some military…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47514068&quot; title=&quot;Its what happens when you surround yourself with incompetent yes men.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47517209&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not just this administration. Everything with the US military has been going clearly downhill since the Millennium Challenge 2002. [1] It was, appropriately enough, a wargame simulating an invasion of Iran. It was a major event involving preparation in years and thousands of individual operators. When it was carried out the invading force was defeated by unexpected resources and resourcefulness from the Iranian side, not entirely unlike what Iran has done during our invasion. Normally this…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The conflict has sparked debate over energy sovereignty, with some arguing that high oil prices and Iranian control of the Strait of Hormuz should accelerate the transition to renewables &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47520723&quot; title=&quot;A core trait of my personality can be summed up as &amp;#39;always look on the bright side of life&amp;#39;. To that end: This war seems more than likely to drive up oil prices not only in the near term, but in the medium and long terms too! In addition, petroleum usage seems likely to become dependant on sucking Iran&amp;#39;s proverbial dick, a notion that very few people in The West will find palatable. Optimistically then, perhaps this will finally light a fire under everyone&amp;#39;s asses to switch to renewable energy…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47514442&quot; title=&quot;The Straight of Hormuz is open to any country willing to pay $2M per voyage. Any country except the U.S. and Israel. The most important aspect of the &amp;#39;toll&amp;#39; is that Iran prefers payment in yuan, not dollars. If Iran succeeds in nationalizing the Straight and is successful in enforcing the toll, it represents a very serious threat to the dominance of the U.S. Dollar as the world&amp;#39;s reserve currency for trading energy.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47523465&quot; title=&quot;In January, the youtuber Technology Connections did a whole rant about how ridiculous it is that we&amp;#39;re not rushing as quickly as possible to get off of non-renewable energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtQ9nt2ZeGM&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others contend that energy independence is a myth, as shifting away from oil may simply replace dependence on the Middle East with a reliance on China for rare earth minerals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47521624&quot; title=&quot;Self-sufficiency is a myth. Even if you wanted to try and be energy independent, for the short and medium term (and maybe longer, who knows?) you will be dependent on China and all the baggage that they bring because of their dominance of rare earth mineral processing. Need a new solar panel? Don&amp;#39;t make a certain country mad (whether that&amp;#39;s your local Ayatollah or CCP official). And that&amp;#39;s just energy. What about pharmaceuticals? Financial markets? Who protects your shipping lanes? Who builds…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bugs.xdavidhu.me/tesla/2026/03/23/running-tesla-model-3s-computer-on-my-desk-using-parts-from-crashed-cars/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Running Tesla Model 3&amp;#39;s computer on my desk using parts from crashed cars&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bugs.xdavidhu.me)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47523330&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;976 points · 333 comments · by driesdep&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A security researcher successfully booted a Tesla Model 3 computer and touchscreen on a desk by salvaging parts from crashed cars and using a full dashboard wiring harness. The setup allows for local exploration of the vehicle&amp;#39;s operating system and network interfaces for bug bounty research. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bugs.xdavidhu.me/tesla/2026/03/23/running-tesla-model-3s-computer-on-my-desk-using-parts-from-crashed-cars/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Running Tesla Model 3&amp;#39;s Computer on My Desk Using Parts From Crashed Cars    URL Source: https://bugs.xdavidhu.me/tesla/2026/03/23/running-tesla-model-3s-computer-on-my-desk-using-parts-from-crashed-cars/    Published Time: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 14:25:45 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Running Tesla Model 3&amp;#39;s Computer on My Desk Using Parts From Crashed Cars - bugs.xdavidhu.me    # [bugs.xdavidhu.me bugs](https://bugs.xdavidhu.me/ &amp;#39;Back to Homepage&amp;#39;)    [](https://xdavidhu.me/ &amp;#39;back to xdavidhu.me&amp;#39;)    #####…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a mix of admiration for the technical feat and surprise at the author&amp;#39;s lack of basic automotive knowledge, specifically regarding &amp;#34;wiring harnesses&amp;#34; (or &amp;#34;looms&amp;#34; in British English) &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47524133&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Turns out that actual cars don’t have individual cables. Instead they have these big “looms”, which bundle many cables from a nearby area into a single harness. This is the reason why I could not find the individual cable earlier. They simply don’t manufacture it. I was really surprised to read this at the end of the article -- how could someone be this deep into a project of this depth and not realize this?!   Not only because all cars (...er... all vehicles ) are wired this way, but also…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47524865&quot; title=&quot;Software people tend to overestimate their knowledge of other disciplines, writing it off as &amp;#39;easy&amp;#39; or work beneath them. Being overpaid compared to your peers certainly doesn&amp;#39;t help dispel this feeling. Some people have built entire careers around designing wire looms.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47524032&quot; title=&quot;Fun linguistic quirk: Americans tend to call it a &amp;#39;wiring harness&amp;#39;, whereas Brits prefer &amp;#39;loom&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users shared similar anecdotes of hacking Tesla hardware for towing or diagnostic testing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47523953&quot; title=&quot;Very cool. Over a year and a half ago I installed a towing brake controller in my Tesla Model Y. Found the location of the plug, how to access and the pinout online (confirmed via a voltmeter..) so the car&amp;#39;s side felt straight forward. But then I needed to find a brake controller that can work with the higher voltage (14.4v vs the normal 12v). Then built a cable from the brake controller to the connector that plugs into the car that I found on eBay. I velcro&amp;#39;d the controller under the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47524415&quot; title=&quot;I used to work for a company that made third party scan tools. We had racks of ecus disconnected from the car with just a diagnostic connector and power. nothing got to a real car without first trying it on the rack. I remember on time we figured out a bmw (pre obdii) had the bytes offset from the standard documentation (it was a semi-standard protocol that some other cars used at the time), we went from we communicate but nothing is wrong to a very long list of dtcs on that controller. (All…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others debated the engineering logic behind placing sensitive vehicle computers in high-heat areas like engine blocks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47524679&quot; title=&quot;The passenger side kick panel or behind the glove box are two very common places for vehicle computers -- some cars have them under the hood, which I always thought was a bad idea.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47524997&quot; title=&quot;My RAM truck with the Cummins diesel engine has the engine computer mounted on the engine block. You&amp;#39;d think the heat and exposure to the elements would make that a bad idea, but I suppose Cummins knows what they&amp;#39;re doing.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A point of contention arose regarding the author&amp;#39;s concern over 14.4v power systems, with commenters noting that such voltages are actually standard for most running internal combustion vehicles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47523953&quot; title=&quot;Very cool. Over a year and a half ago I installed a towing brake controller in my Tesla Model Y. Found the location of the plug, how to access and the pinout online (confirmed via a voltmeter..) so the car&amp;#39;s side felt straight forward. But then I needed to find a brake controller that can work with the higher voltage (14.4v vs the normal 12v). Then built a cable from the brake controller to the connector that plugs into the car that I found on eBay. I velcro&amp;#39;d the controller under the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47524026&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; But then I needed to find a brake controller that can work with the higher voltage (14.4v vs the normal 12v) Not understanding this sentence.  Most running ICE vehicles product closer to that 14.4 than 12v.  I think a standard controller would have worked fine?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bethmathews.substack.com/p/why-so-many-control-rooms-were-seafoam&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why so many control rooms were seafoam green (2025)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bethmathews.substack.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47518960&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1035 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 200 comments · by Amorymeltzer&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mid-century control rooms, including those in the Manhattan Project, were painted seafoam green based on color theorist Faber Birren’s research, which suggested the hue reduces visual fatigue, improves worker morale, and creates a non-distracting environment for high-stakes industrial tasks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bethmathews.substack.com/p/why-so-many-control-rooms-were-seafoam&quot; title=&quot;Title: Why So Many Control Rooms Were Seafoam Green    URL Source: https://bethmathews.substack.com/p/why-so-many-control-rooms-were-seafoam    Published Time: 2025-12-17T00:42:49+00:00    Markdown Content:  _Hello! This is a long, hopefully fun one! If you’re reading this in your email, you may need to click “expand” to read all the way to the end of this post. Thank you!_    When I lived in Nashville, my girlfriends and I would take ourselves on “field trips” across the state. We once went on a tour…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The widespread use of seafoam green in control rooms and Soviet cockpits reflects a historical emphasis on functional color theory and human affordances that some argue has been lost to modern minimalism &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47534055&quot; title=&quot;I got through this entire article before I realized it was written by someone I worked with back in my agency days. Beth is an awesome designer with a great eye. Nice to see her on the front page here. Now, to the content: I often wonder how much we have lost with our endless quest for minimalism. We can&amp;#39;t even make buttons look like buttons anymore. Affordances have become anemic at times. Designers who think and care deeply about functional color theory and usable design should be cherished.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47533833&quot; title=&quot;I wonder if the designers of cold war soviet planes read the same color theory because their cockpits are always a very particular indescribable shade of green. There were also very specific colors for subsystems, yellow for fuel, purple for hydraulics etc. Much more than the contemporary US designs.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. This shift mirrors the transition from sodium to LED streetlights, where commenters debate whether the original monochromatic yellow was a deliberate choice for visual contrast and eye sensitivity or simply a byproduct of physics and efficiency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47534361&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m reminded of an article a while back talking about how the change from sodium streetlights to LED streetlights had a whole lot of unforeseen effects on animals, people&amp;#39;s sleep patterns, driver awareness and visibility, etc. due to color changes. There was a comment on the article from an old civil engineer saying &amp;#39;no, these were not unforeseen, we actually did the research back in the day to figure out what color the street lights should be, that&amp;#39;s why they were the color they were.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47534656&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; that&amp;#39;s why they were the color they were That doesn&amp;#39;t seem right to me. Sodium (and mercury) vapor lamps are the color they are due to physics, and were chosen because they&amp;#39;re very efficient (and long lasting). Low-pressure sodium is the best and worst of these; essentially monochromatic but fantastic efficiency. Their only advantage, color-wise, is that the light can be filtered out easily (they used to be widely used in San Jose because Lick Observatory could filter out the 589 nm light).&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47536831&quot; title=&quot;The monochromatic light emitted from sodium lamps is also close to the peak sensitivity of the human eye. Colours are not distinguishable, but contrast is much enhanced compared to “cooler” light sources. *edit: but it’s the overwhelmingly larger lifespan (20-30k hrs) that led to the wide adoption as streetlights. And I guess, the same is true for the change to led today, because of less power consumption.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some miss the specific spectra of older lighting, others contend that high-CRI LEDs can effectively replicate traditional warmth while offering superior visibility and energy savings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47535658&quot; title=&quot;IDK if you&amp;#39;ve noticed but we are all lighting our house with bulbs that use 1/10th the amount of electricity as incandescents did. I like the color spectrum of a real lightbulb better, too, but not enough to pay 10x in power. I make up for it by using all kinds of random bulbs all over the place so that the aggregate light in the room fills more of the spectrum than if I coordinated them all to be the same.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47536724&quot; title=&quot;Modern street lighting provides a way clearer view of the scene imo than the old sodium lighting. Maybe it&amp;#39;s just brighter now.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47536414&quot; title=&quot;Did you try using high CRI LEDs with color remperature of 2700K–3000K? When I switched from halogen to LED I did just that and the difference is not noticeable, you&amp;#39;ll have the same yellowish tint and very natural looking colours. Even with expensive bulbs, extra longevity covers for higher cost.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://whoami.wiki/blog/personal-encyclopedias&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Personal Encyclopedias&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (whoami.wiki)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47522173&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;893 points · 185 comments · by jrmyphlmn&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The creator of whoami.wiki has launched an open-source tool that uses AI and MediaWiki to transform personal data exports—such as photos, messages, and bank transactions—into a structured, interconnected &amp;#34;personal encyclopedia&amp;#34; that preserves family history and life events. &lt;a href=&quot;https://whoami.wiki/blog/personal-encyclopedias&quot; title=&quot;Title: Personal Encyclopedias — whoami.wiki    URL Source: https://whoami.wiki/blog/personal-encyclopedias    Markdown Content:  # Personal Encyclopedias — whoami.wiki    [Home](https://whoami.wiki/)[Docs](https://whoami.wiki/docs)[Blog](https://whoami.wiki/blog)[Changelog](https://whoami.wiki/changelog)    [Discord](https://discord.gg/dq3tGvaRef)[GitHub](https://github.com/whoami-wiki/whoami)    # Personal Encyclopedias    ![Image 1:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The use of AI to organize personal histories is seen as a &amp;#34;bicycle for the mind&amp;#34; that removes the tedium of archiving &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528144&quot; title=&quot;I am usually grossed out by AI when it fakes humanness, but not here, I think. Steve Jobs saw the computer as a bicycle for the mind, a way to enable us to do more and be more. This is the metaphor against which I measure all technology. I think that in this case, it helped someone make something deeply human by abstracting the tedium away. It did what a computer should do: aid a human with their task. Technology has been feeling like a devil&amp;#39;s bargain for a while now. This was a rare glimpse…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, though some find the automated cross-referencing of private data like bank statements and receipts to be unsettling or dystopian &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47527836&quot; title=&quot;That sounds like a really cool project and a really interesting way to preserve family history. I feel like i don&amp;#39;t know how to emotionally react to the AI part of this story. To begin with, it is fundamentally cool we have technology like that. At the same time it felt bittersweet, like an artisan being put out of business by the factory. The first part of the story felt like much of the love was in constructing everything by hand, it seems almost sad to lose that. There is also an element of…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528098&quot; title=&quot;The project itself is cool if you have access to a LLM API endpoint with good privacy (perhaps your own GPU server). I wouldn&amp;#39;t give a LLM run by a US corporation access to my private photographs.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users prefer the tactile, &amp;#34;artisan&amp;#34; nature of physical scrapbooks and hand-bound journals to preserve family memories &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528966&quot; title=&quot;I am starting to do this with actual physical books. I have thousands of photos going back over my life, and I am putting them together in Scribus to then go and print a physical book for each year or event or holiday along with some relevant text. Ideally square books that can go on a coffee table. At least when I am dead there will be some part of my existence in physical form, unlike all the digital things we spend decades creating. I might put a SD card taped in the front of each one with a…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528205&quot; title=&quot;I do something similar with my wife; at the start of every year we take around 50 sheets of paper and bind them into a little notebook. The binding cloth we use is usually a combination of clothes that tore, fell into abject disrepair the previous year. She then finds little things (ex: matchbox from a restaurant we visited and loved) and decorates it. Throughout the year we keep writing in it, things we learnt, discords we had and how we resolved them, recipes I experimented with and we loved,…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others are leveraging digital tools and audio recordings to bridge gaps in genealogy caused by war or lost documentation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47529783&quot; title=&quot;Extremely cool. I&amp;#39;m into genealogy and can trace my family 10 generations back (250 years) to their arrival to Argentina. Documentation is lost or lacking once you reach Europe, other branches of the family with more recent arrivals to the country are very hard to trace. In part due to mismatching surnames and in part due to the wars. We have started asking old family members to send us whatsapp audios with tales and things they remember from long-passed away family members; and what was life…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant debate exists regarding the burden of preservation: some argue that descendants have a right to discard records that are emotionally painful or overwhelming &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47533373&quot; title=&quot;My grandfather left five moving cartons of diaries written by typewriter, every single day of his adult life documented, an achievement, to be sure. When he passed away he left them to my mother to be scanned, transcribed and moved online, something that weighed her down for the last 15 years of her life. When he died there was no way of transcribing them automatically (there still isn&amp;#39;t really). The boxes stood in my mothers already cramped attic for 13 years, then she got cancer, and she felt…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47535571&quot; title=&quot;No, the dead can&amp;#39;t exert such influence from the grave. You&amp;#39;re dead. It&amp;#39;s the next generation&amp;#39;s turn. If you were the kind of person whose diary the kids or grandkids want to see thrown in the trash, then that&amp;#39;s how it is. You had your time on the face of the earth, you don&amp;#39;t get to haunt the descendants. You got erased, that&amp;#39;s it. Or your story gets retold in filtered ways in the fog of the past. Im perfectly content knowing just vague information about individual ancestors 3-4 levels up, and…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend that irreplaceable family history should be saved for future generations who may view it with more detachment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47534325&quot; title=&quot;I understand there may be an emotional desire to get rid of something unpleasant, but some descendants e.g. 5 generations down the line may feel very differently about this. Given how easy scanning is these days (there are literally companies that will do it for you if you send them a box), and given how good the technology for sifting through mountains of text is becoming, and given that it&amp;#39;s literally irreplaceable text, I can&amp;#39;t imagine doing this to family records that one of my ancestors…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/25/technology/social-media-trial-verdict.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Meta and YouTube found negligent in landmark social media addiction case&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nytimes.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47520505&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;500 points · 522 comments · by mrjaeger&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A landmark court ruling has found Meta and YouTube negligent for intentionally designing addictive features that harmed the mental health of young users, marking a significant legal shift in social media accountability. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/25/technology/social-media-trial-verdict.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: nytimes.com    URL Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/25/technology/social-media-trial-verdict.html    Warning: Target URL returned error 403: Forbidden  Warning: This page maybe requiring CAPTCHA, please make sure you are authorized to access this page.    Markdown Content:&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The verdict has sparked debate over whether digital platforms should be legally categorized alongside chemical substances like nicotine, with some arguing that &amp;#34;addictive&amp;#34; labels should be reserved for physiological dependencies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47521526&quot; title=&quot;As someone who values a liberal society, I hope we’d be exceedingly careful in what we label “addictive” in the same bucket as oxy or nicotine. I also hope the reasons are obvious.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47521646&quot; title=&quot;If something compels behavior vs. behavior remaining a free choice, a liberal society can and should treat it like any other source of compulsion. Personally, I am leery of any technical definition of “addictive” that operates outside the traditional chemical influences on physiology. So I would not describe gambling in that sense. One might have a malady that causes gambling to take on the same physiological vibe for you, but that’s not what it means for gambling itself to be addictive.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others contend that children cannot be expected to resist &amp;#34;dark patterns&amp;#34; designed by experts to maximize engagement, comparing the platforms&amp;#39; effects to gambling &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47521546&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think the reasons are obvious. Where do you put gambling on the spectrum?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47522187&quot; title=&quot;Keep in mind that this case is about about a minor, not an adult. I don&amp;#39;t think it&amp;#39;s fair to ask children to resist social media through sheer willpower when there are legions of highly educated adults on the other side trying to increase engagement. It should be no surprise that children can be manipulated by highly intelligent adults.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47521822&quot; title=&quot;Apps like instagram and YouTube should be required at least to give an option to disable reels and shorts&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While there is hope for a future iteration of social media focused on collective health rather than ego, skeptics question if such models are financially viable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47520938&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d hope the next iteration of social media tools humanity builds are less about reinforcing the individual ego and more about collective improvement, learning, and supporting the health of our species. Anecdote, but it does seem like a lot of younger folks I speak with are exhausted by the dark patterns and dopamine extraction that top-k social media platforms create. If agents/AI/bots inadvertently destroy the current incarnation of social media through noise, I think we&amp;#39;ll be better for it.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47521020&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I&amp;#39;d hope the next iteration of social media tools humanity builds are less about reinforcing the individual ego and more about collective improvement, learning, and supporting the health of our species Do you have a mechanism for this in mind, incentives-wise? I can&amp;#39;t see this making money.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47521115&quot; title=&quot;I guess the real question is whether a website where you communicate with friends and close ones needs to be a multi-trillion dollar company in the first place... historically most of them have not been worth very much at all.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, some observers predict the verdict will be overturned on appeal, noting that American juries often deliver large, unpredictable awards in complex civil cases that are later invalidated by judges &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47521334&quot; title=&quot;At least even money that an appellate court throws this verdict out entirely. Reminder that the US is the only developed country that uses juries for civil trials- everywhere else, complex issues of business litigation are generally left to a panel of judges. It&amp;#39;s not that hard to rile up a bunch of randomly impaneled jurors against Big Bad Corporation. The US is kind of infamous for its very large, very unpredictable civil verdicts. There&amp;#39;s an incredibly long history of juries racking up…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://andregarzia.com/2026/03/apple-just-lost-me.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apple Just Lost Me&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (andregarzia.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47517701&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;463 points · 461 comments · by syx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A longtime Apple user is migrating to Linux and Android due to frustrations with macOS software gatekeeping, design flaws in macOS 26, and a failed age verification system that locked him out of features despite his 25-year history with the platform. &lt;a href=&quot;https://andregarzia.com/2026/03/apple-just-lost-me.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Apple Just Lost Me • AndreGarzia.com    URL Source: https://andregarzia.com/2026/03/apple-just-lost-me.html    Markdown Content:  # Apple Just Lost Me • AndreGarzia.com  [AndreGarzia.Com](https://andregarzia.com/)    [Blog](https://andregarzia.com/recent.html)[About Me](https://andregarzia.com/about.html)[My Books](https://andregarzia.com/books.html)[Creative Writing Resources](https://andregarzia.com/creative-writing/)    # Apple Just Lost Me    Apple has just lost me as an user. It will take me a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on Apple&amp;#39;s increasing control over its ecosystem, with significant backlash directed at the &amp;#34;Liquid Glass&amp;#34; design shift and the company&amp;#39;s rigid age verification methods &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47518022&quot; title=&quot;I found this to be a very odd and strange rant. The author&amp;#39;s three issues with Apple are: 1. Gatekeeping. OK, fine, but at the very least this has been Apple&amp;#39;s stance for a very long time now (the author talks about faxing credit card details), so it&amp;#39;s not like it&amp;#39;s something new. If you wanted full unfettered installation rights, Apple was never the company for you. And while I think it&amp;#39;s fine to argue against Apple&amp;#39;s stance, I find most of the arguments are less than honest about the pros of…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47517969&quot; title=&quot;The space allocated for &amp;#39;Apple has lost their way&amp;#39; has been maxed out for decades, so it bears stressing that this time is different. This Liquid Glass debacle has disillusioned everyone from hardcore Apple fans to normal people who otherwise don&amp;#39;t follow tech. Once the dust settles, this will be a case study for decades to come. Apple threw their hard-won reputational gains off a cliff for _nothing_.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue Apple has always prioritized gatekeeping, others point out that macOS was historically more open and that current restrictions—such as requiring a credit card for UK age verification—exclude many users who only have passports or debit cards &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47518128&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If you wanted full unfettered installation rights, Apple was never the company for you Author started at System 8.  They didn&amp;#39;t start locking things down until the iPhone.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47518855&quot; title=&quot;Author here. Thanks for engaging is such gentle way, this is rare these days. Let me address some of your comments and maybe you&amp;#39;ll understand my position a bit better even if you don&amp;#39;t agree. &amp;gt; 1.Gatekeeping. OK, fine, but at the very least this has been Apple&amp;#39;s stance for a very long time now (the author talks about faxing credit card details), so it&amp;#39;s not like it&amp;#39;s something new. If you wanted full unfettered installation rights, Apple was never the company for you. And while I think it&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47518308&quot; title=&quot;His complaints are that Apple only supports credit cards for age verification. Please read more carefully.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. This has led to notable frustration, with some users planning to migrate their families to Linux or GrapheneOS due to the lack of flexible verification options &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47517979&quot; title=&quot;We just got fucked by this today. My 22 year old daughter doesn&amp;#39;t have a driving license or a credit card but does have a passport and it didn&amp;#39;t work. She&amp;#39;s now got a kids phone. I haven&amp;#39;t tried the 20 year old yet who is in the same situation... They have 5 days to unfuck this or I&amp;#39;m literally rolling out Pixels + Graphene to the family. Exit plan for the Mac is a Linux desktop.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these criticisms, some defenders suggest the age verification issues stem from poorly implemented government mandates rather than Apple&amp;#39;s own policies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47517984&quot; title=&quot;Any system of age verification will fail to satisfy the writer, because it is fundamentally the UK’s fault by requiring such draconian measures. Credit cards don&amp;#39;t work ever time, but the other options of using AI or sending your data to a third company who will resell it are also not great. The only other complaint seems to be liquid glass? It really feels strange because Apple feels on the upswing with their new office and their cheap, repairable mac.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47518156&quot; title=&quot;Any age verification should come with an OAUTH style government run API. The idea being you verify your ID with the government, and the service that required age verification gets back a true or false for does this user meet this age requirement. That way the amount of data shared is kept to a minimum. The UK, and Brazil who passed a similar law, &amp;#39;cheated&amp;#39; by just forcing private companies to figure it out.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.wsj.com/world/europe/spies-lies-and-fake-investors-in-disguise-how-plotters-tried-to-flip-a-european-election-1f42b39a&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Slovenian officials blame Israeli firm Black Cube for trying to manipulate vote&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (wsj.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47519519&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;632 points · 264 comments · by cramsession&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Slovenian officials have accused the Israeli private intelligence firm Black Cube of deploying undercover operatives and deceptive tactics in a failed attempt to manipulate the country&amp;#39;s 2022 general election. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.wsj.com/world/europe/spies-lies-and-fake-investors-in-disguise-how-plotters-tried-to-flip-a-european-election-1f42b39a&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;LwhOj&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;LwhOj&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.politico.eu&amp;amp;#x2F;article&amp;amp;#x2F;black-cube-leak-tape-corruption-israel-spy-firm-slovenia-election&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.politico.eu&amp;amp;#x2F;article&amp;amp;#x2F;black-cube-leak-tape-corrupt...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on allegations of election interference by the Israeli firm Black Cube, with some users arguing that such actions should be considered grounds for war &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47520575&quot; title=&quot;It seems to me that interfering in a foreign election should be understood to be grounds for war.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt; and others questioning if the firm&amp;#39;s influence extends to manipulating online message boards &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47520702&quot; title=&quot;Quick question: Could they also be manipulating this message board&amp;#39;s voting?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters criticize the disproportionate influence of Israeli security firms in European and American politics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47520580&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s insane the power and influence Israelis have. In the US it&amp;#39;s blatant, from the insane amounts of money and weaponry sent to Israel (why are american taxpayers subsidizing Israel exactly? It&amp;#39;s not like they are neither poor nor US owes them) to the recent events in the middle east. But even in Europe. Here in Italy the coalition government has multiple high profile politicians that just happen to be shareholders or CEOs of security companies owned by Israelis. And just so it happens that…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47520049&quot; title=&quot;Israel really needs to stop interfering in other countries&amp;#39;  elections. That&amp;#39;s not acceptable. We don&amp;#39;t interfere when  their population votes for warcriminals either.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the actions of a private company should not be conflated with the Israeli state &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47520119&quot; title=&quot;This isn&amp;#39;t Israel the state, it&amp;#39;s a private company that&amp;#39;s based in Israel.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. The thread is polarized, with debates over whether criticism of these entities is rooted in geopolitical concerns or antisemitism &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47520580&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s insane the power and influence Israelis have. In the US it&amp;#39;s blatant, from the insane amounts of money and weaponry sent to Israel (why are american taxpayers subsidizing Israel exactly? It&amp;#39;s not like they are neither poor nor US owes them) to the recent events in the middle east. But even in Europe. Here in Italy the coalition government has multiple high profile politicians that just happen to be shareholders or CEOs of security companies owned by Israelis. And just so it happens that…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47522538&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s amazing to see the amount of hate towards Israel here.  I guess part of it it&amp;#39;s just plain old Jew hate in new cover&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, alongside a defense of U.S.-Israel relations as standard strategic diplomacy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47520765&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; why are american taxpayers subsidizing Israel exactly? The same reason USA is subsidizing half the middle eastern countries - its a strategic location near extremely important transit routes, near important resources, and right between major powers so the region doesn&amp;#39;t squarely fall in any major power&amp;#39;s sphere of influence and thus up to be influenced. I dont know why all these conspiracy theories think the usa&amp;lt;-&amp;gt;israel relationship is so strange, but dont blink at the relationship usa has…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arcprize.org/arc-agi/3&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ARC-AGI-3&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (arcprize.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47521150&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;497 points · 365 comments · by lairv&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The ARC-AGI-3 technical report details the latest advancements and methodologies used to address the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, a benchmark designed to measure human-like general intelligence in AI systems. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arcprize.org/arc-agi/3&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;arcprize.org&amp;amp;#x2F;media&amp;amp;#x2F;ARC_AGI_3_Technical_Report.pdf&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;arcprize.org&amp;amp;#x2F;media&amp;amp;#x2F;ARC_AGI_3_Technical_Report.pdf&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ARC-AGI-3 introduces a scoring metric inspired by robotics that emphasizes efficiency and continual learning, sparking debate over whether AI must match human sample efficiency to be considered &amp;#34;intelligent&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47522597&quot; title=&quot;https://x.com/scaling01 has called out a lot of issues with ARC-AGI-3, some of them (directly copied from tweets, with minimal editing): - Human baseline is &amp;#39;defined as the second-best first-run human by action count&amp;#39;. Your &amp;#39;regular people&amp;#39; are people who signed up for puzzle solving and you don&amp;#39;t compare the score against a human average but against the second best human solution - The scoring doesn&amp;#39;t tell you how many levels the models completed, but how efficiently they completed them…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47522882&quot; title=&quot;Francois here. The scoring metric design choices are detailed in the technical report: https://arcprize.org/media/ARC_AGI_3_Technical_Report.pdf - the metric is meant to discount brute-force attempts and to reward solving harder levels instead of the tutorial levels. The formula is inspired by the SPL metric from robotics navigation, it&amp;#39;s pretty standard, not a brand new thing. We tested ~500 humans over 90 minute sessions in SF, with $115-$140 show up fee (then +$5/game solved). A large…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47522850&quot; title=&quot;Lol basically we&amp;#39;re saying AI isn&amp;#39;t AI if we utilize the strength of computers (being able to compute). There&amp;#39;s no reason why AGI should have to be as &amp;#39;sample efficient&amp;#39; as humans if it can achieve the same result in less time.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue the benchmark&amp;#39;s skewed scoring and lack of specialized harnesses unfairly penalize models, while proponents and the creator, François Chollet, maintain that true AGI should adapt to new tasks without human-designed shortcuts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47522597&quot; title=&quot;https://x.com/scaling01 has called out a lot of issues with ARC-AGI-3, some of them (directly copied from tweets, with minimal editing): - Human baseline is &amp;#39;defined as the second-best first-run human by action count&amp;#39;. Your &amp;#39;regular people&amp;#39; are people who signed up for puzzle solving and you don&amp;#39;t compare the score against a human average but against the second best human solution - The scoring doesn&amp;#39;t tell you how many levels the models completed, but how efficiently they completed them…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47522882&quot; title=&quot;Francois here. The scoring metric design choices are detailed in the technical report: https://arcprize.org/media/ARC_AGI_3_Technical_Report.pdf - the metric is meant to discount brute-force attempts and to reward solving harder levels instead of the tutorial levels. The formula is inspired by the SPL metric from robotics navigation, it&amp;#39;s pretty standard, not a brand new thing. We tested ~500 humans over 90 minute sessions in SF, with $115-$140 show up fee (then +$5/game solved). A large…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47524668&quot; title=&quot;This is a very good estimation of AGI. We give humans and AI the same input and measure the results. Kudos to ARC for creating these games. I really wonder why so many people fight against this. We know that AI is useful, we know that AI is researchful, but we want to know if they are what we vaguely define as intelligence. I’ve read the airplanes don’t use wings, or submarines don’t swim. Yes, but this is is not the question. I suggest everyone coming up with these comparisons to check their…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47523539&quot; title=&quot;Those are supposed to be issues? After reading your list my impression of ARC-AGI has gone up rather than down. All of those things seem like the right way to go about this.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Some participants question the fundamental premise, suggesting that &amp;#34;general&amp;#34; intelligence is a misnomer because humans themselves are &amp;#34;jagged&amp;#34; in their abilities and AI should not be required to mimic human biological processes like flapping wings to fly &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47522623&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; As long as there is a gap between AI and human learning, we do not have AGI. Back in the 90&amp;#39;s, Scientific American had an article on AI - I believe this was around the time Deep Blue beat Kasparov at chess. One AI researcher&amp;#39;s quote stood out to me: &amp;#39;It&amp;#39;s silly to say airplanes don&amp;#39;t fly because they don&amp;#39;t flap their wings the way birds do.&amp;#39; He was saying this with regards to the Turing test, but I think the sentiment is equally valid here. Just because a human can do X and the LLM can&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47524732&quot; title=&quot;AGI’s &amp;#39;general&amp;#39; is the wrong word, I thinkg. Humans aren’t general, we’re jagged. Strong in some areas, weak in others, and already surpassed in many domains. LLM are way past us at languages for instance. Calculators passed us at calculating, etc.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lapcatsoftware.com/articles/2026/3/11.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apple randomly closes bug reports unless you &amp;quot;verify&amp;quot; the bug remains unfixed&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lapcatsoftware.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47521876&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;470 points · 293 comments · by zdw&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple is reportedly pressuring developers to verify long-standing bug reports against new software betas, threatening to close the tickets as resolved even when the underlying technical issues remain unfixed. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lapcatsoftware.com/articles/2026/3/11.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Apple randomly closes bug reports unless you “verify” the bug remains unfixed    URL Source: https://lapcatsoftware.com/articles/2026/3/11.html    Published Time: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 15:10:04 GMT    Markdown Content:  Previous: [App Store developers: suggest your small ideas for improvement](https://lapcatsoftware.com/articles/2026/3/10.html)    [Articles index](https://lapcatsoftware.com/articles/index.html &amp;#39;The Desolation of Blog&amp;#39;)[Jeff Johnson](https://lapcatsoftware.com/) ([My…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters note that Apple’s practice of closing bug reports is a common &amp;#34;spring cleaning&amp;#34; tactic used across enterprise software, open source projects, and &amp;#34;stalebot&amp;#34; automation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47522571&quot; title=&quot;to be fair this is pretty common spring cleaning in any bugzilla...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47523227&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Author must not have worked in enterprise software before. Or with open source projects. Fucking stalebot.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While developers argue this is a necessary &amp;#34;cost/benefit analysis&amp;#34; to manage impossible workloads and unmaintained environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47524638&quot; title=&quot;Hi, bigcorp employee getting showered with tickets here. I don&amp;#39;t have enough time in the day to deal with the tickets where the reporter actually tries, let alone the tickets where they don&amp;#39;t. If I tell you to update your shit, it&amp;#39;s because it&amp;#39;s wildly out of date, to the point that your configuration is impossible for me to reproduce without fucking up my setup to the point that I can&amp;#39;t repro 8 other tickets.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47523684&quot; title=&quot;Yep. On the other side of the curtain this often isn&amp;#39;t nefarious. It&amp;#39;s a simple cost/benefit analysis of spending time on something that one user is complaining about versus a backlog of higher business priorities. I&amp;#39;ve seen this in my work and it makes me sad for the user, but it often does take a bit of effort to spear these bug reports through.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others criticize it as a &amp;#34;poor practice&amp;#34; that shifts the burden of proof onto the user &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47522747&quot; title=&quot;Author must not have worked in enterprise software before. That&amp;#39;s a classic trick where the developer will push back on the bug author and say &amp;#39;I can&amp;#39;t reproduce this, can you verify it with the latest version?&amp;#39; without actually doing anything. And if it doesn&amp;#39;t get confirmed then they can close it as User Error or Not Reproducible. Of course, the only way to counter this is by saying &amp;#39;Yes I verified it&amp;#39; without actually verifying it.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47522601&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s very common but it&amp;#39;s still a poor practice.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue this approach prioritizes internal metrics over real-world software quality, effectively ignoring bugs unless a user persistently pushes back &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47522610&quot; title=&quot;I was literally just coming in here to comment &amp;#39;in before someone says this is fine and there&amp;#39;s no issue.&amp;#39; and the first(!) comment is effectively &amp;#39;this is fine and there&amp;#39;s no issue.&amp;#39; The sentiment feels like software folks are optimizing for the local optimum. It&amp;#39;s the programmer equivalent of &amp;#39;if it&amp;#39;s important they&amp;#39;ll call back.&amp;#39; while completely ignoring the real world first and second-order effects of such a policy.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47522966&quot; title=&quot;From experience with Microsoft (paid) support (after doing 5 tickets because it&amp;#39;s never the right team and apparently moving tickets internally is for losers), they will ask for proof of the reproduction. And they will take every opportunity to shift the blame (&amp;#39;Oh I can see in the log you&amp;#39;re running an antivirus, open a ticket with them. Closed&amp;#39;).&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://flighty.com/airports&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Flighty Airports&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (flighty.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47511589&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;566 points · 185 comments · by skogstokig&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Flighty&amp;#39;s real-time &amp;#34;Meltdown Map&amp;#34; tracks flight delays and cancellations across major North American airports, highlighting significant disruptions in Calgary and weather-related issues in Winnipeg and Ottawa. &lt;a href=&quot;https://flighty.com/airports&quot; title=&quot;Flighty Airports Meltdown Map    Search any airport for real-time delays, weather, arrivals, departures, and performance insights powered by Flighty.    [![Logo](/airports/image/logo.png)    Flighty airports](/airports)    Search airports...    ⌘K    [TV Mode](/airports/tv)[Get App](https://apps.apple.com/app/flighty-live-flight-tracker/id1358823008)    # Major Airports &amp;amp; Disruptions    LiveToday    Download Flighty    North America    LiveToday    Airport    City    Departures Delays    Arrivals…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While many users praise Flighty for its &amp;#34;craft&amp;#34; and aesthetic design &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47511826&quot; title=&quot;Flighty is a good representation of what craft - compounded over time - gives you. Everything from on design, to features, to data integrations. It&amp;#39;s everything that vibe coding and agents don&amp;#39;t get you. I appreciate their craft.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47511632&quot; title=&quot;Love Flightly, one of the best apps ever. Beautiful design + incredibly useful info.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, critics argue it prioritizes superficial beauty over functional utility, specifically citing illegible flight durations and a lack of boarding time data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47512122&quot; title=&quot;Flighty is poorly designed. It’s one of those slick apps designed to superficially look nice without actually being well-thought-out.  That’s not what design is or should mean; that’s just aesthetics. Case in point: one of the most important pieces of data for a flight, its duration, is displayed in the tiniest type size on the flight info display pane, in light grey text on a slightly darker grey background.  It’s bordering on illegible. It also doesn’t surface boarding time (or countdown to…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47512356&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; one of the most important pieces of data for a flight, its duration Flighty is all about getting you to the airport in time for your flight, so the most important pieces of information are things like departure times, connection times, delay information, terminal and boarding gate. These are prioritised in the interface. The flight duration is set when you book the flight and it&amp;#39;s not going to change, there is no reason to prioritise this. &amp;gt; It also doesn’t surface boarding time I think this…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a sharp divide regarding its target audience: some view it as a premium tool for frequent flyers despite its $60/year price tag &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47513799&quot; title=&quot;I use the Flighty app pretty often, and its $60/year.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, while others find it too expensive for leisure travelers and less informative than FlightAware or built-in iOS trackers for managing delays &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47512279&quot; title=&quot;Flighty is very pretty, but I’m not giving up FlightAware anytime soon. I travel a lot, and frequently encounter flight delays. It’s mind boggling difficult to find out where my plane is when it’s delayed via Flighty. This and a few other things, FlightAware gets right. I feel like Flighty is for rare leisure traveler and FlightAware is for weekly business and/or pilot traveler. I’ve honestly had better luck with iOS built in flight tracker than Flighty itself.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47512402&quot; title=&quot;Flighty is in a weird place because I&amp;#39;m a rare/leisure traveller and wow Flighty nowhere near reasonably priced for that market. I used it in free mode when I was on iOS, but it would be ~£10 per trip for something that would improve my life less than a coffee at the airport. In my opinion they need to aggressively cut costly features (like weather data), and if they have different international data feeds, perhaps do region locked pricing. I don&amp;#39;t fly to the US much, so let me buy a Europe and…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, developers in the thread expressed concerns regarding the high cloud costs associated with scaling such data-intensive apps &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47513655&quot; title=&quot;How does an app like this make money? I made an app that I simply can’t promote because it would bankrupt me. Every person I share it with thinks it’s genius and been using it but if it ever hits critical mass without me knowing it, id be those guys with the “my cloud provider reamed me overnight” posts.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/25/us/politics/supreme-court-cox-music-copyright.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Supreme Court Sides with Cox in Copyright Fight over Pirated Music&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nytimes.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47518281&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;402 points · 341 comments · by oj2828&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Cox Communications, holding that internet service providers are not liable for vicarious copyright infringement when their subscribers use the service to download pirated music. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/25/us/politics/supreme-court-cox-music-copyright.html&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.is&amp;amp;#x2F;mEgaK&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.is&amp;amp;#x2F;mEgaK&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.supremecourt.gov&amp;amp;#x2F;opinions&amp;amp;#x2F;25pdf&amp;amp;#x2F;24-171_bq7d.pdf&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.supremecourt.gov&amp;amp;#x2F;opinions&amp;amp;#x2F;25pdf&amp;amp;#x2F;24-171_bq7d.pdf&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;supreme.justia.com&amp;amp;#x2F;cases&amp;amp;#x2F;federal&amp;amp;#x2F;us&amp;amp;#x2F;607&amp;amp;#x2F;24-171&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Supreme Court&amp;#39;s unanimous decision against record labels effectively ends the strategy of holding ISPs liable for users&amp;#39; copyright infringement, reaffirming the &amp;#34;Betamax case&amp;#34; precedent that protects technologies capable of substantial non-infringing uses &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47520993&quot; title=&quot;Hilariously (and appropriately), the decision cites Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc. , also known as the &amp;#39;Betamax case.&amp;#39; &amp;gt; (a) “The Copyright Act does not expressly render anyone liable for infringement committed by another.” Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417, 434. &amp;gt; In Sony, copyright owners sued the maker and the retailers of the Betamax video tape recorder. Id., at 422. The tape recorder could be used to record copyrighted television…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47518444&quot; title=&quot;9-0 against the record labels. This effectively ends a long running strategy of trying to milk ISPs for people torrenting without a VPN. At the same time it likely puts things like the *Arr stack at more risk given their more tailored nature.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Commentators compared the ruling to shielding a van manufacturer from liability for a bank robbery unless intent to facilitate the crime is proven &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47519639&quot; title=&quot;Just to try and understand the decision, an analogy that’s coming to mind would be like saying a van manufacturer wouldn’t have liability if it’s used in a bank robbery. However if the manufacturer sold it with the intent for the buyer to use it for bank robbery (the manufacturer having the intent in this case, as well as the robber themselves), then they could become partially liable. Have I got that right?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47519688&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s my understanding. Basic carrier vs service stuff. What I wonder is how this might impact gun manufacturers.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users proposed reforming copyright through exponential renewal fees to encourage works entering the public domain, others argued this would unfairly allow wealthy corporations to maintain monopolies indefinitely &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47519121&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not sure I agree that any single fixed term makes sense. Rather, I think it&amp;#39;d be better if the exponential cost to society (in terms of works that don&amp;#39;t happen, and works that don&amp;#39;t happen based on those works that didn&amp;#39;t happen and so on compounding) was just part of the yearly renewal price. Do maybe everyone gets 7 years flat to start with, then it costs $100*1.3^(year). So after another 25 years it&amp;#39;d be around $70.5k renewal. At 50 years it&amp;#39;d be $50 million. At 75 years it&amp;#39;d be $35…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47519282&quot; title=&quot;I think this is a great idea. Free then make it cost more.  A lot could enter the public domain, and valuable IP could be kept by companies as long as they’re willing to pay.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47520547&quot; title=&quot;I think that&amp;#39;s a horrible idea. There&amp;#39;s zero benefit to society in letting corporations like Disney that can afford to pay keep works out of the public domain longer than others.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, there is concern that while ISPs are now safer, specialized software tools for piracy may face increased legal risk &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47518444&quot; title=&quot;9-0 against the record labels. This effectively ends a long running strategy of trying to milk ISPs for people torrenting without a VPN. At the same time it likely puts things like the *Arr stack at more risk given their more tailored nature.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://research.google/blog/turboquant-redefining-ai-efficiency-with-extreme-compression/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;TurboQuant: Redefining AI efficiency with extreme compression&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (research.google)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47513475&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;569 points · 164 comments · by ray__&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google Research has introduced TurboQuant, a suite of quantization algorithms that compress large language model key-value caches by up to 6x with zero accuracy loss. By utilizing polar coordinates and error-checking transforms, the system significantly increases processing speeds for AI models and high-dimensional vector search engines. &lt;a href=&quot;https://research.google/blog/turboquant-redefining-ai-efficiency-with-extreme-compression/&quot; title=&quot;Title: TurboQuant: Redefining AI efficiency with extreme compression    URL Source: https://research.google/blog/turboquant-redefining-ai-efficiency-with-extreme-compression/    Markdown Content:  # TurboQuant: Redefining AI efficiency with extreme compression  [Jump to Content](https://research.google/blog/turboquant-redefining-ai-efficiency-with-extreme-compression/#page-content)    [Research](https://research.google/ &amp;#39;Google Research&amp;#39;)    [Research](https://research.google/ &amp;#39;Google Research&amp;#39;)    *   …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion is dominated by criticism of the article&amp;#39;s writing style, with several users arguing that the &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; and inaccurate metaphors—such as describing a dynamic cache as a &amp;#34;digital cheat sheet&amp;#34;—strongly suggest it was poorly AI-generated &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47514198&quot; title=&quot;This is the worst lay-people explanation of an AI component I have seen in a long time. It doesn&amp;#39;t even seem AI generated.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47514754&quot; title=&quot;There are tells all over the page: &amp;gt; Redefining AI efficiency with extreme compression &amp;#39;Redefine&amp;#39; is a favorite word of AI. Honestly no need to read further. &amp;gt; the key-value cache, a high-speed &amp;#39;digital cheat sheet&amp;#39; that stores frequently used information under simple labels No competent engineer would describe a cache as a &amp;#39;cheat sheet&amp;#39;. Cheat sheets are static, but caches dynamically update during execution. Students don&amp;#39;t rewrite their cheat sheets during the test, do they? LLMs love their…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical skepticism centers on how random rotations &amp;#34;simplify&amp;#34; data geometry and how 1-bit quantization can preserve complex high-dimensional relationships &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47517134&quot; title=&quot;Can someone ELI5 these two concepts please, which make no sense to me: &amp;gt; &amp;#39;TurboQuant starts by randomly rotating the data vectors. This clever step simplifies the data&amp;#39;s geometry&amp;#39; I don&amp;#39;t understand how taking a series of data and applying a random rotation could mathemetically lead every time to &amp;#39;simpler&amp;#39; geometry. If I throw a bunch of shapes on the ground, tightly packed and touching each other, then rotate all of them, you can&amp;#39;t guarantee that the new conglomerate shape is any more/less…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Amidst the critique, a researcher noted a significant missing citation, pointing out that the core mathematical mechanism of using geometric rotation for extreme quantization was previously established in their 2021 &amp;#34;DRIVE&amp;#34; paper &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47514494&quot; title=&quot;This is a great development for KV cache compression. I did notice a missing citation in the related works regarding the core mathematical mechanism, though. The foundational technique of applying a geometric rotation prior to extreme quantization, specifically for managing the high-dimensional geometry and enabling proper bias correction, was introduced in our NeurIPS 2021 paper, &amp;#39;DRIVE&amp;#39; ( https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2021/hash/0397758f8990c... ). We used this exact rotational approach…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47516937&quot; title=&quot;If they didn&amp;#39;t cite your paper that&amp;#39;s bullshit. But if they read your paper enough that they invited you to a talk, that probably means they were far enough along to independently inventing it they were going to do so anyway, and wanted to chat with someone who was also doing the thing they were already doing.  Good ideas tend to reveal themselves to anyone who is aware of the problem.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://spectrum.ieee.org/data-center-dc&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Data centers are transitioning from AC to DC&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (spectrum.ieee.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47511703&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;311 points · &lt;strong&gt;382 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by jnord&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hyperscale data centers are transitioning from AC to 800-volt DC power distribution to meet the massive energy demands of AI. This shift eliminates inefficient conversion steps, reducing copper requirements by 45% and improving energy efficiency to better support high-density GPU racks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://spectrum.ieee.org/data-center-dc&quot; title=&quot;Is DC Power the Future of AI Data Centers?    Could switching to 800 V DC be the key to more efficient data centers?    [IEEE.org](https://www.ieee.org/)[IEEE Xplore Digital Library](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/home.jsp)[IEEE Standards](https://standards.ieee.org/)[More Sites](https://www.ieee.org/sitemap.html)    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The transition to DC is not a vindication of Edison, but rather a result of modern wide-bandgap semiconductors like GaN and SiC that finally allow for efficient high-voltage DC conversion, which was impossible in Tesla’s era &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47512105&quot; title=&quot;It is absolutely stupid to talk about this as edisons revenge. If Tesla had the modern high power transistors needed to get high voltage dc out of the ac produced from a spinning turbine he would be all for high voltage dc too. Tesla understood that high voltage was needed for efficient long range transmission. He also understood that transformers were the inly remotely efficient way to climb up to and down from these high voltages. And transformers only work with ac. So he designed an ac…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47513067&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;It is absolutely stupid to talk about this as edisons revenge. If Tesla had the modern high power transistors needed to get high voltage dc out of the ac produced from a spinning turbine he would be all for high voltage dc too. This! The soon people realized these facts the better. The pervasive high rise buildings did not happen before the invention of modern cranes. Exactly twenty years ago I was doing a novel research on GaN characterization, and my supervisors made a lot money with…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While DC power has long been a standard in telecommunications and enterprise hardware for its reliability, its adoption in data centers is often framed as a &amp;#34;new&amp;#34; trend despite decades of availability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47512058&quot; title=&quot;DC power has been an option for datacenter equipment since I was a young lad racking and stacking hardware. Cisco, Dell, HPE, IBM, and countless others all had DC supply options. Same with PDUs. What’s old is new again. See e.g. https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000221234/wiring-in...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47512177&quot; title=&quot;48vdc was common in phone exchanges. They filled the basement with lead-acid batteries and to could run without the grid for a couple weeks. In turn the phone was 99.999% reliable for decades.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47512329&quot; title=&quot;Not to be _that_ guy, but it was technically -48V DC. Honestly, that was pretty surprising to me when I had to work with some telco equipment a couple of decades ago.  To this day, I don&amp;#39;t think I&amp;#39;ve encountered anything else that requires negative voltage relative to ground.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users advocate for DC-powered homes to eliminate inefficient AC-to-DC &amp;#34;bricks,&amp;#34; but others argue that the high cost of thick cabling for low-voltage DC and the logistical nightmare of a dual-system transition make widespread residential adoption unlikely &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47512238&quot; title=&quot;Our houses should be DC.  So wasteful to have all these bricks to change to AC to DC.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47512451&quot; title=&quot;Waiting for home DC. It is silly to have AC to DC converters in all of my wall connected electronics ( LED bulbs, home controller, computer equipment etc )&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47512480&quot; title=&quot;Not going to happen. For the same reason that the US never converted to a higher domestic voltage even though there are many practical advantages. The transition from one system to another at the consumer level would be terrible, even if there would be some advantage (and I&amp;#39;m not sure the one you list is even valid, you&amp;#39;d get DC-DC converters instead because your consumers typically use a lower voltage than the house distribution network powering your sockets) it would be offset by the cost of…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47521014&quot; title=&quot;I set up my own home network with a Vertiv Liebert Li-ion UPS a few years ago and was thinking about how inefficient the whole process is regarding power. The current goes from AC to DC back to AC back to DC. Straight from the UPS as DC would work much better, and as I was teaching myself more about networking equipment, I was surprised to learn that most of it isn&amp;#39;t DC input by default (i.e., each piece of equipment tends to come with built-in AC-DC conversion). Then I started routing ethernet…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00950-w&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Antimatter has been transported for the first time&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nature.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47518171&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;420 points · 202 comments · by leephillips&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Physicists at CERN successfully transported 92 antiprotons in a truck for the first time, using a specialized magnetic trap to move the volatile particles 8 kilometers across the laboratory site for high-precision study. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00950-w&quot; title=&quot;Title: Antimatter has been transported for the first time ever — in the back of CERN’s truck    URL Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00950-w    Markdown Content:  # Antimatter has been transported for the first time ever — in the back of CERN’s truck    [Skip to main content](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00950-w#content)    Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the transportation of antimatter evokes sci-fi visions of ideal spacecraft fuel or high-yield weaponry &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47519618&quot; title=&quot;From a layman&amp;#39;s point of view antimatter seems like an ideal spacecraft fuel.  It&amp;#39;s as energy dense as E = mc^2 allows, and if you have infrastructure to make it, the only input you need to produce it is electricity. Being able to transport it seems like an important piece of that puzzle. Production and storage would need to be scaled by many orders of magnitude, but that&amp;#39;s merely an engineering problem...right?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47520722&quot; title=&quot;From a layman&amp;#39;s point of view, I&amp;#39;m more interested in antimatter&amp;#39;s potential as a weapon. Not necessarily because I want to use it, but because I have a vague idea of what it&amp;#39;s capable of, and what that would mean in the hands of certain groups capable of producing it.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, commenters clarify that this specific experiment involved only 70–92 antiprotons—an amount of energy equivalent to a flying mosquito or a fraction of a firecracker &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47518881&quot; title=&quot;If containment was to fail, it the total energy released would have been approximately 2.766 * 10 ^ -8 J, so it wasn&amp;#39;t particularly dangerous&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47518993&quot; title=&quot;Wolfram Alpha says its approximately the kinetic energy of a mosquito in flight&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47519267&quot; title=&quot;Which seems suprisingly high given that it&amp;#39;s 92 protons worth of antimatter!&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. The primary breakthrough is not &amp;#34;antimatter batteries&amp;#34; but rather portable precision instrumentation, allowing researchers to move samples away from the magnetic interference of CERN’s facilities for cleaner measurement &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47519058&quot; title=&quot;“Antimatter in a truck” is great headline material, but the actual advance is portable precision instrumentation. CERN can make/store the antiprotons, but not measure them as cleanly as they want because the facility itself introduces tiny magnetic fluctuations. So this is really a story about moving the sample to a quieter lab, not moving toward sci-fi antimatter batteries... for now&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion regarding its safety as a fuel source is divided: some fear the threat of total annihilation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47520346&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; ideal spacecraft fuel If you&amp;#39;re ok with the looming threat of total annihilation. I suppose at least it will kill you faster than your neurons can communicate so you wouldn&amp;#39;t even notice.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, while others argue that any high-density energy source is inherently a &amp;#34;bomb,&amp;#34; and antimatter simply represents the peak of weight efficiency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47520675&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If you&amp;#39;re ok with the looming threat of total annihilation. Don&amp;#39;t you have that problem with any energy-dense fuel? It&amp;#39;s just that it doesn get more dense than that, so you can be very space and weight efficient. It&amp;#39;s like everybody saying that a hydrogen car is a rolling bomb because of the energy stored in the hydrogen. Well, sure, but gasonline has just as much energy stored. Which is the whole point of fuel. To store energy. It&amp;#39;s not like you are bringing 100x as much energy with you just…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://v-os.dev&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;VitruvianOS – Desktop Linux Inspired by the BeOS&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (v-os.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47512816&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;366 points · 227 comments · by felixding&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VitruvianOS is a Linux-based operating system inspired by BeOS and Haiku that features a custom kernel bridge to support Haiku applications and a reactive, user-centric desktop environment. &lt;a href=&quot;https://v-os.dev&quot; title=&quot;Title: VitruvianOS    URL Source: https://v-os.dev/    Published Time: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 22:16:58 GMT    Markdown Content:  # VitruvianOS    [](https://github.com/VitruvianOS)[](https://t.me/vitruvian_official)    [VitruvianOS - go to homepage](https://v-os.dev/)    Toggle Navigation    *   [Home](https://v-os.dev/)  *   [News](https://v-os.dev/news/)  *   [Blog](https://v-os.dev/blog/)  *   [Download](https://v-os.dev/download/)  *   [About](https://v-os.dev/about/)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a deep nostalgia for BeOS, with users recalling its &amp;#34;magical&amp;#34; performance and unique features like stackable window tabs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47514567&quot; title=&quot;I bought an Amiga in the early 90&amp;#39;s and enjoyed it immensely. Commodore went under and Amiga died. I bought BeOS in the late 90&amp;#39;s and enjoyed it immensely like a breath of fresh air in a sewage pipe. BeOS died. With my track record I really, really should&amp;#39;ve bought Windows. Twice, to make sure.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47513796&quot; title=&quot;The important question becomes can you stack the window decoration &amp;#39;tabs&amp;#39; of different apps into a single stack of tabs like in BeOS? Demonstrated here (animated): https://www.haiku-os.org/docs/userguide/en/images/gui-images...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47513775&quot; title=&quot;BeOS was such an amazing experience back in the day. It really felt magical. Too bad it got shutdown. I wonder what the evolution of it would be like today&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some blame Microsoft’s antitrust practices for the platform&amp;#39;s demise, others argue that Be Inc. may have failed regardless of market interference &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47516282&quot; title=&quot;Correction, BeOS was killed. I’ll never get over Microsoft getting in trouble for including a browser in Windows but not for forcing companies to not allow BeOS to be installed when it was getting legs.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47517505&quot; title=&quot;I studied the MS antitrust case extensively when it was happening, and I agree that the abuse against BeOS was MS greatest antitrust offense.  However, as a fan of BeOS, I see no evidence at all that Be Inc. would have been successful if MS hadn&amp;#39;t abused its position.  Unfortunately we will never really know what might have been.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Many commenters recommend Haiku as the superior way to experience the &amp;#34;real deal,&amp;#34; though critics point out that Haiku struggles with modern hardware support, slow development, and software compatibility compared to Linux &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47513689&quot; title=&quot;If you like BeOS, take a look at Haiku https://www.haiku-os.org/ , it&amp;#39;s very nice and very usable system based directly on BeOS.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47513824&quot; title=&quot;And much better option, running the real deal, instead of some compatibility layer.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47514573&quot; title=&quot;And things such as ruby don&amp;#39;t work on it. Well, what shall  I say? The &amp;#39;best&amp;#39; ideas get beaten when in practically already  works very well - aka Linux. People need to compare to Linux  and if there are failure points, they need to fix it. Haiku  keeps on failing at core considerations. If you look at guides,  they recommend to &amp;#39;run in qemu&amp;#39;. Well, that is a fever dream.  They need to focus on real hardware. And they need to support  programming languages just as Linux does. And modern hardware  too.…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47514155&quot; title=&quot;Presumably there&amp;#39;s a lot more modern software written for Linux which you&amp;#39;d end up running through a compatibility layer from Haiku? The better option seems relative. I could be misremembering how Linux programmes are handled on Haiku though.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.blog/news-insights/company-news/updates-to-github-copilot-interaction-data-usage-policy/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Updates to GitHub Copilot interaction data usage policy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.blog)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47521799&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;389 points · 169 comments · by prefork&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Starting April 24, 2026, GitHub will use interaction data from Copilot Free, Pro, and Pro+ users to train its AI models unless they opt out. This update does not affect Copilot Business or Enterprise users, and previous opt-out preferences will be honored. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.blog/news-insights/company-news/updates-to-github-copilot-interaction-data-usage-policy/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Updates to GitHub Copilot interaction data usage policy    URL Source: https://github.blog/news-insights/company-news/updates-to-github-copilot-interaction-data-usage-policy/    Published Time: 2026-03-25T12:02:29-07:00    Markdown Content:  # Updates to GitHub Copilot interaction data usage policy - The GitHub Blog    [Skip to content](https://github.blog/news-insights/company-news/updates-to-github-copilot-interaction-data-usage-policy/#start-of-content)[Skip to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GitHub’s decision to enable AI model training on Copilot interaction data by default has sparked significant backlash, with users criticizing the &amp;#34;opt-out&amp;#34; approach for paying customers and the framing of data collection as a user-facing feature &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47522146&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; On April 24 we&amp;#39;ll start using GitHub Copilot interaction data for AI model training unless you opt out. Review this update and manage your preferences in your GitHub account settings. Now  &amp;#39;Allow GitHub to use my data for AI model training&amp;#39; is enabled by default. Turn it off here: https://github.com/settings/copilot/features Do they have this set on business accounts also by default? If so, this is really shady.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47522218&quot; title=&quot;If you scroll down to &amp;#39;Allow GitHub to use my data for AI model training&amp;#39; in GitHub settings, you can enable or disable it. However, what really gets me is how they pitch it like it’s some kind of user-facing feature: Enabled = You will have access to the feature Disabled = You won&amp;#39;t have access to the feature As if handing over your data for free is a perk. Kinda hilarious.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47522045&quot; title=&quot;If I&amp;#39;m paying, which I am, I want to have to opt-in, not opt-out, Mario Rodriguez / @mariorod needs to give his head a wobble. What on earth are they thinking...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users report the setting is currently disabled for them, others worry it may be &amp;#34;silently flipped&amp;#34; on the April 24th deadline &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47522168&quot; title=&quot;Interestingly, it is disabled by default for me.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47522219&quot; title=&quot;Me too, which is making me wonder if they&amp;#39;re planning on silently flipping this setting on April 24th (making it impossible to opt out in advance).&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Major security concerns were raised regarding the inability to exclude sensitive files like API keys from being sent to Microsoft, as well as the potential for personal Copilot licenses to inadvertently ingest private enterprise IP &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47523767&quot; title=&quot;Fun fact: Copilot gives you no way to ignore sensitive files with API keys, passwords, DB credentials, etc.: https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/11254#discussi... So by default you send all this to Microsoft by opening your IDE.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47522626&quot; title=&quot;It’s not clear to me how GitHub would enforce the “we don’t use enterprise repos” stuff alongside “we will use free tier copilot for training”. A user can be a contributor to a private repository, but not have that repository owner organisation’s license to use copilot. They can still use their personal free tier copilot on that repository. How can enterprises be confident that their IP isn’t being absorbed into the GH models in that scenario?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ente.com/blog/ensu/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ensu – Ente’s Local LLM app&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ente.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47516650&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;360 points · 172 comments · by matthiaswh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ente has launched Ensu, an open-source, offline LLM app that provides private, on-device AI chat for mobile and desktop without relying on centralized big tech providers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ente.com/blog/ensu/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Ensu - Ente&amp;#39;s Local LLM app    URL Source: https://ente.com/blog/ensu/    Published Time: 2026-03-02    Markdown Content:  # Ensu - Ente&amp;#39;s Local LLM app    [](https://ente.com/)    Download    [](https://ente.com/)    [Pricing](https://ente.com/#pricing)[Blog](https://ente.com/blog)[About](https://ente.com/about)[Download](https://ente.com/download)[Help](https://ente.com/help)    [25 k](https://github.com/ente-io/ente)Sign up    # Ensu - Ente&amp;#39;s Local LLM app    March 02, 2026    [[email…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ente’s release of Ensu, a local LLM wrapper, has drawn criticism for being a &amp;#34;mere wrapper&amp;#34; around small models like Qwen and LFM that lacks the novelty or multi-modality suggested by its marketing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47518914&quot; title=&quot;Given how the blog is presented, I assumed this was something novel that solved a unique problem, maybe a local multi-modal assistant for your device. I installed it and it&amp;#39;s none of that. It is a mere wrapper around small local LLM models. And, it&amp;#39;s not even multi-modal! Anyone could&amp;#39;ve one-shotted this in Claude in an hour (I&amp;#39;m not exaggerating). What&amp;#39;s the target audience here? Your average person doesn&amp;#39;t care about the privacy value proposition (at least not by severely sacrificing chat…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47517210&quot; title=&quot;You can see what it uses here - https://github.com/ente-io/ente/blob/main/web/apps/ensu/src/... Either LFM2.5-1.6B-4bit or Qwen3.5-2B-8bit or Qwen3.5-4B-4bit&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47517386&quot; title=&quot;Huh, 1.6B/2B/4B models, I guess they weren&amp;#39;t joking when they said &amp;#39;not as powerful as ChatGPT or Claude Code&amp;#39;. Also unsure why they said &amp;#39;Claude Code&amp;#39;, it&amp;#39;s not an CLI agent AFAIK?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users appreciate the accessibility for non-technical audiences &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47519883&quot; title=&quot;Local LLM options for less technical people is worth celebrating IMO. No, not &amp;#39;anybody&amp;#39; can have one-shotted this in CC in an hour. We have not seen a tidal wave of untechnical people vibe coding up their own software solutions.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt; and Ente&amp;#39;s existing reputation for privacy-focused tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47517096&quot; title=&quot;Heard the first time about them (ente) yesterday in a discussion about &amp;#39;which 2FA are u using?&amp;#39;. Directly switched to https://ente.com/auth/ on Android and Linux Desktop and very happy with it. Going to give this a try...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue the product feels like a rushed attempt to join the AI craze that will struggle to compete with native, hardware-optimized solutions from Apple and Google &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47520165&quot; title=&quot;I hate to say it, but this looks like the sort of thing a CEO told their team to build on Monday morning in a panic because they are grasping for ways to participate in the AI craze. And the team did just that: they built it that morning using Claude Code. There is truly nothing original here and the product doesn&amp;#39;t have a chance in hell of earning money. Local LLMs on-device will be dominated by the device vendors, whose control of the hardware stack combined with their ability to subsidize…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a notable lack of technical specifications on the landing page regarding quantization and performance, leading some to question the app&amp;#39;s utility compared to established tools like LMStudio &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47518914&quot; title=&quot;Given how the blog is presented, I assumed this was something novel that solved a unique problem, maybe a local multi-modal assistant for your device. I installed it and it&amp;#39;s none of that. It is a mere wrapper around small local LLM models. And, it&amp;#39;s not even multi-modal! Anyone could&amp;#39;ve one-shotted this in Claude in an hour (I&amp;#39;m not exaggerating). What&amp;#39;s the target audience here? Your average person doesn&amp;#39;t care about the privacy value proposition (at least not by severely sacrificing chat…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47517103&quot; title=&quot;Maybe I’m missing it but the page is really light on technical information. Is this a quantized / distilled model of a larger LLM? Which one? How many parameters? What quantization? What T/s can I expect?  What are the VRAM requirements? Etc etc&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.freecad.org/2026/03/25/freecad-version-1-1-released/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;FreeCAD  v1.1&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.freecad.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47521945&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;338 points · 105 comments · by sho_hn&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FreeCAD Version 1.1 has been released, introducing significant updates including transparent Part Design previews, interactive tool draggers, a new CAM tool library, and improvements to Assembly and FEM workbenches. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.freecad.org/2026/03/25/freecad-version-1-1-released/&quot; title=&quot;Title: FreeCAD Version 1.1 Released    URL Source: https://blog.freecad.org/2026/03/25/freecad-version-1-1-released/    Published Time: 2026-03-25T07:49:43+00:00    Markdown Content:  # FreeCAD Version 1.1 Released - FreeCAD News    [![Image 1: FreeCAD News](https://i0.wp.com/blog.freecad.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/square-256.png?fit=256%2C256&amp;amp;ssl=1)](https://blog.freecad.org/)    # [FreeCAD News](https://blog.freecad.org/)    [Announcement](https://blog.freecad.org/category/announcement/),…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users highlight FreeCAD&amp;#39;s spreadsheet tool as a superior method for parametric design compared to some paid alternatives, though some find the manual aliasing of values tedious &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47523383&quot; title=&quot;I post this in every FreeCAD thread: If you&amp;#39;re going to start designing something with it, use the spreadsheet tool to make everything parametric. You&amp;#39;ll save yourself a ton of time as your designs get more complicated. Maybe this isn&amp;#39;t anything new to experience CAD users. I don&amp;#39;t know if other CAD tools do this as I started using FreeCAD after playing with 3D printing.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47523407&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s very common (Fusion calls it User Parameters, etc.) and indeed nice practice. FreeCAD has a few ways to do it, Spreadsheets but also free-form properties on objects. It&amp;#39;s very flexible in this regard.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47523623&quot; title=&quot;The Fusion implementation sucks. A spreadsheet is a far more natural way to do this, Im surprised FreeCad is doing it better than the paid variant.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47523749&quot; title=&quot;The only issue I have with the Spreadsheet is that I need to add an alias for every value I want to use in the Sketch or Part Design workbench. In practice, this usually looks like A       B      width   2mm      length  3mm and for every cell in B I add an alias with the same value as in column A. Is there a way around that?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While beginners find the software intuitive for simple 3D printing projects, experienced professionals argue it still lacks the fluid workflow and robust geometry kernels found in industry-standard suites like SolidWorks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47523443&quot; title=&quot;Recently one of the magnet holders for my window shutters broke, and I thought I&amp;#39;d take a crack at designing a replacement to 3D Print. I&amp;#39;d never designed anything in CAD software before, so I had no real reference. I found FreeCAD extremely easy to use and intuitive. I watched a couple videos and followed-along with the tutorials, then started on my own item. It&amp;#39;s a relatively simple 3-part component. I took measurements with digital calipers, and in a few hours was printing the first…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47525286&quot; title=&quot;Is it any closer to functioning like Solidworks, NX, Creo, and all the other professional CAD software packages? Edit: After opening it up it seems better than before but still not a replacement. I can use the draw tool to create a rectangle but than immediately cannot apply symmetry or equal length constraints until I delete others which shouldn&amp;#39;t overlap. Clicking to create a cut or hole opens up a window that does not make it easy to create a new sketch from within or place something from…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47525558&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s inherently limited by its geometry kernel. Most &amp;#39;real&amp;#39; CAD suites use something like parasolid, usually with a bunch of extras slapped on top. Making a new one from scratch is a massive undertaking, but I&amp;#39;ll remain forever hopeful that we get a new, modern, open-source kernel one of these days...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these technical hurdles, there is optimism that AI-assisted coding and OpenSCAD integration could accelerate the development of open-source CAD tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47525040&quot; title=&quot;for incredibly simple parts that i can describe using measurements, i&amp;#39;ve had a lot of fun pointing a high-power ai at openscad and letting it iterate through making the design for me it&amp;#39;s still tough to turn it into something i can then keep fiddling with in freecad though put on &amp;#39;tron: ares&amp;#39; in the background to fully appreciate the model designing something that will be 3d-printed :)&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47524572&quot; title=&quot;In coming time you can see freecad massively improving. This space lacks good opensource solution. I have tried creating my parts, tried tinkercad (which is simple but limited) Tried fusion. And pretty much other things don&amp;#39;t support mac. I&amp;#39;ve a hunch lots of vibe coders are going to come and launch stuff like freecad and Gimp (which I never liked, can&amp;#39;t even get simple tasks done in gimp) Future is bright for opensource powered by LLM coding on steroids.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-03-24</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-03-24</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/soraofficialapp/status/2036532795984715896&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Goodbye to Sora&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47508246&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1140 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 850 comments · by mikeocool&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI is reportedly shutting down its Sora AI video application. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/soraofficialapp/status/2036532795984715896&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;soraofficialapp&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2036532795984715896&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;soraofficialapp&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;20365327959847158...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.hollywoodreporter.com&amp;amp;#x2F;business&amp;amp;#x2F;digital&amp;amp;#x2F;openai-shutting-down-sora-ai-video-app-1236546187&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.hollywoodreporter.com&amp;amp;#x2F;business&amp;amp;#x2F;digital&amp;amp;#x2F;openai-sh...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The shutdown of Sora is viewed by some as a &amp;#34;disaster&amp;#34; for the industry and a sign of the AI bubble popping, driven by high costs and a strategic pivot toward coding and business users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47510542&quot; title=&quot;I thought AI video was the future? Now the biggest AI company in the world is straight up shutting their service down because it&amp;#39;s too expensive? Simply a disaster for OpenAI and the industry as a whole.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47509291&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;OpenAI’s top executives are finalizing plans for a major strategy shift to refocus the company around coding and business users&amp;#39; - WSJ Coding is where the money is. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46432791#46434072&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47510047&quot; title=&quot;It feels like the bubble is starting to pop. A crisis of confidence is not something OAI can afford at this stage...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users found genuine joy and a creative outlet in the tool, others noted that the novelty wore off quickly once the initial excitement faded &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47511146&quot; title=&quot;I had so much fun making videos with my mom when it came out. During the first two weeks, we made over 100 cameo videos together - we were constantly running up against the upload limit. It unleashed tons of genuine creativity, joy, and laughter from us. After those first two weeks though, we just… didn’t use it again. The novelty wore off and there wasn’t anything really to bring us back. That was the real downfall of Sora.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47512618&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m having trouble understanding this. There were some very funny videos, created by people with a great sense of humor, and I happen to enjoy laughing, and I don&amp;#39;t feel bad about that. I always saw it as the Vine of AI. For a litmus test of your perspective, try using sora. Try to make a video that makes someone genuinely laugh. Sora doesn&amp;#39;t prompt itself. Human creativity and humor is still required. Sure, it was moderated to heck, like all models attempting to avoid PR disasters (see Grok),…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue the service represented a &amp;#34;corporate controlled&amp;#34; stream of low-value content, raising concerns about its potential for targeted influence and the psychological impact of consuming &amp;#34;incorrect&amp;#34; physics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47511942&quot; title=&quot;Good riddence to bad trash. To me, this idea represents the absolute worst of the AI wave (out of a lot to choose from): a corporate controlled endless stream of the feelies to keep people plugged in and scrolling for nobody’s benefit except those in control of the output. If “entertainment” can be produced algorithmically to a volume and level of quality that the masses find attractive, it’s only a matter of time before bad (worse?) actors take control of it to start highly targeted campaigns…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47512727&quot; title=&quot;I feel like taking in GenAI content, even if it makes me laugh, probably does something bad to my brain. It looks like real life, but the physics is just wrong in ways that range from obvious to very subtle. I don’t want to feed my brain videos of things that look photorealistic but do not depict reality, that just seems foolish somehow. Like, imagine if you watched a bunch of GenAI videos of cars sliding on ice from the driver’s perspective. The physics is wrong, and surely it’s going to make…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47510719&quot; title=&quot;Every flop used for entertainment is opportunity cost. Compute is far more  valuable used internally to create AGI than creating parody videos.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.sambent.com/microsofts-plan-to-fix-windows-11-is-gaslighting/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft&amp;#39;s &amp;quot;fix&amp;quot; for Windows 11&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sambent.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47500335&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1046 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 757 comments · by h0ek&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft has announced a seven-point plan to remove ads and forced Copilot integrations from Windows 11, though critics argue the &amp;#34;fix&amp;#34; ignores deeper issues like mandatory Microsoft accounts, persistent telemetry, and automatic OneDrive syncing that remain central to the company&amp;#39;s data-driven revenue model. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.sambent.com/microsofts-plan-to-fix-windows-11-is-gaslighting/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Microsoft&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;Fix&amp;#39; for Windows 11: Flowers After the Beating    URL Source: https://www.sambent.com/microsofts-plan-to-fix-windows-11-is-gaslighting/    Published Time: 2026-03-23T14:38:57.000Z    Markdown Content:  [Microsoft](https://www.sambent.com/404/)  Microsoft spent four years stuffing Windows 11 with ads, forced Copilot integrations, and bloatware, now they want applause for promising to remove it.    [![Image 1:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that Microsoft continuously tests the limits of user hostility, often rolling back only the &amp;#34;last straw&amp;#34; while retaining other anti-consumer gains &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47500721&quot; title=&quot;It’s quite common for companies to work their way up to the line of the most user hostile version of their product that users will tolerate. Especially with software where they can just go flip a switch and turn off whatever feature did cross the line but keep everything they gained by inching up to the line, which seems to inevitably result in things like the condition of windows 11. I think the only way this gets better for consumers is if customer response more often insisted further roll…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47502775&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I think the only way this gets better for consumers is if customer response more often insisted further roll backs than just the last straw if a company crosses the line. I think consumers have little power here. Our economic system fundamentally chooses to reward such behaviour. Until we change that, the power will always be with these kind of companies. Perhaps governments could levy punative fines in such situations. But that seems like a bandaid (and ripe for corruption). Ideally we&amp;#39;d…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest switching to Linux or macOS to avoid &amp;#34;picking your poison,&amp;#34; others contend that FOSS alternatives fail to meet the niche software and gaming needs of most users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47500847&quot; title=&quot;The only way this get better is if the user gets to choose between an OS with ads, lock-in, telemetry etc. and then one with none of that. As it is now, buying a laptop in a store is a &amp;#39;pick your poison&amp;#39; situation.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47501053&quot; title=&quot;Better yet: don&amp;#39;t pick any poison at all -- both System76 and Tuxedo Computers (as examples, sometimes you can buy a latop without an OS and save the money, same goes for PCs) offer laptops with Linux installed: no Microslop tax, and hardware that&amp;#39;s guaranteed to work with OSS.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47501108&quot; title=&quot;Most people want a computer that works with their software. No, &amp;#39;learn the FOSS version&amp;#39; is not a solution. Especially because nearly everyone has some niche thing they like, some 5% that isn&amp;#39;t covered by the FOSS solutions, that only a niche Windows program can actually do correctly. And that doesn&amp;#39;t even get into gaming.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47500676&quot; title=&quot;These flowers smell like shit. If you don&amp;#39;t use Linux or MacOS yet, why?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a consensus that this behavior persists because Microsoft’s dominance in government and corporate sectors makes it difficult for consumers to truly &amp;#34;vote with their wallets&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47500739&quot; title=&quot;Microsoft lost its way much earlier than 4 years ago. It abused users at the time of Netscape wars and forcing Internet Explorer down people&amp;#39;s throats. But they hit an infinite gold mine with government adoption and for the last 30 years no amount of bad engineering was able to shake off government use. Windows 11 is bad? Yes, but did you try Microsoft Teams? The only way to force Microsoft into &amp;#39;users matter&amp;#39; engineering is to get govvies off it. My 2c.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504300&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Our economic system fundamentally chooses to reward such behavior&amp;#39;.  This is true, but what people seem to fail to grasp is that rewarding such behavior == buying the product.  If people simply didn&amp;#39;t buy it, they wouldn&amp;#39;t do it.  It&amp;#39;s really that simple.  It may be hard to not buy, of course.  The alternatives may be worse, there may be downsides to not buying, etc.  But nothing else will really be effective.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.xda-developers.com/wine-11-rewrites-linux-runs-windows-games-speed-gains/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Wine 11 rewrites how Linux runs Windows games at kernel with massive speed gains&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (xda-developers.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47507150&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1304 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 497 comments · by felineflock&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wine 11 introduces NTSYNC, a new Linux kernel driver that significantly boosts Windows gaming performance by natively handling synchronization. The update also completes the WoW64 architecture for seamless 32-bit app support without extra libraries and adds major improvements for Wayland, Vulkan 1.4, and high-performance hardware decoding. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.xda-developers.com/wine-11-rewrites-linux-runs-windows-games-speed-gains/&quot; title=&quot;Wine 11 rewrites how Linux runs Windows games at the kernel level, and the speed gains are massive    Wine 11 is the biggest jump for Linux gaming in years.    Menu    [![XDA logo](https://static0.xdaimages.com/assets/images/xda-logo-full-colored-light.svg?v=3.6 &amp;#39;XDA&amp;#39;)](/)    Sign in now    [ ]    Close    * + [News](/news/)    + [Tech Deals](https://www.xda-developers.com/deals/)    + [PC Hardware](/category/pc-hardware/)      [ ]      Submenu      - [CPU](/processor/)      - [GPU](/gpu/)      -…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wine is widely praised for its meticulous reverse-engineering of Windows edge cases, which has made Linux a viable gaming platform &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47507834&quot; title=&quot;Wine is a project that I&amp;#39;ve grown a near-infinite level of respect for. I don&amp;#39;t know for sure, but I suspect that a lot of the work for Wine is boring and thankless. Digging through and trying to get exact parity with both the documented and undocumented behavior of Windows for the past 30 years doesn&amp;#39;t sound fun, but it&amp;#39;s finding every little weird edge case that makes Wine a viable product. The fact that Wine runs a lot of games better than Windows now (especially older games) shows a very…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47509589&quot; title=&quot;I avoided using Wine (and Linux for gaming generally) for years on the sole basis that I assumed what they were trying to do was impossible to do well. Occasionally I’d try wine for some simple game and be impressed it worked at all, but refused to admit to myself that it was something I could rely on. (This was many years ago and I freely admit today that I was wrong.)&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While recent kernel-level rewrites show massive frame rate jumps in benchmarks, some users caution that these gains are less dramatic when compared to existing &amp;#34;fsync&amp;#34; solutions rather than vanilla Wine &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47507876&quot; title=&quot;Before anyone gets too excited about ntsync, the performance gains are (with few exceptions) mild, usually in the lower single percentage range. These extreme gains are the result of benching against vanilla wine without fsync, anyone playing demanding games on linux would have been doing so using fsync. This is mentioned in the article but treated like a side note. I&amp;#39;ve been running benchmarks between both and while the performance increase is real, please temper your expectations. A few…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47507833&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Dirt 3 went from 110.6 FPS to 860.7 FPS &amp;gt; Resident Evil 2 jumped from 26 FPS to 77 FPS &amp;gt; Call of Juarez went from 99.8 FPS to 224.1 FPS &amp;gt; Tiny Tina&amp;#39;s Wonderlands saw gains from 130 FPS to 360 FPS Amazing. I don&amp;#39;t understand the low level details on how such a massive speed gain was ripe for the picking but I welcome! I guess thanks Valve for pouring money into Proton.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. A central debate exists regarding Wine&amp;#39;s future: some argue it may eventually make native Linux ports unnecessary by becoming a more stable target API than Linux itself &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47507752&quot; title=&quot;Wine might be oddly self-defeating. Broad game support on Linux increases the viability of Linux as a desktop, which increases market share, which may result in developers creating Linux ports as a 1st class concern, which don&amp;#39;t need Wine to run.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47507770&quot; title=&quot;Wine&amp;#39;s APIs are more stable than Linux&amp;#39;s APIs, so it seems more plausible to me that Wine will become the first class target itself.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, while others note that complex productivity suites like MS Office remain difficult to support because they utilize far more obscure Windows system integrations than games do &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47509486&quot; title=&quot;It is a superb project, and a hard thing to do. It is a pity that the apps most business people use everyday, like Word and Excel and Outlook don&amp;#39;t work in it (Excel 2010 is the last version that has Platinum status). It is interesting that these are harder to get working than games.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47509815&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It is interesting that these are harder to get working than games. Games are mostly just doing their own thing, only interacting with the system for input &amp;amp; output.  MS Office is using every single corner of Windows: every feature in the XML libraries, tons of .NET type stuff, all the OLE and COM and typelib and compound storage features, tons of Explorer integrations, auto-updating stuff via Windows patching mechanisms... there&amp;#39;s almost no corner of the Windows OS that MS Office doesn&amp;#39;t use.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/issues/24512&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tell HN: Litellm 1.82.7 and 1.82.8 on PyPI are compromised&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47501426&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;935 points · 498 comments · by dot_treo&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Versions 1.82.7 and 1.82.8 of the Litellm package on PyPI have been compromised with malicious code that executes an encoded blob, potentially causing system instability and resource exhaustion. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/issues/24512&quot; title=&quot;About an hour ago new versions have been deployed to PyPI.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;I was just setting up a new project, and things behaved weirdly. My laptop ran out of RAM, it looked like a forkbomb was running.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;I&amp;amp;#x27;ve investigated, and found that a base64 encoded blob has been added to proxy_server.py.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;It writes and decodes another file which it then runs.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;I&amp;amp;#x27;m in the process of reporting this upstream, but wanted to give everyone here a headsup.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;It is also reported in this issue:  &amp;lt;a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The LiteLLM compromise originated from a vulnerability in a CI/CD tool (Trivy) that allowed a malicious actor to exfiltrate a PyPI publishing token &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47502858&quot; title=&quot;LiteLLM maintainer here, this is still an evolving situation, but here&amp;#39;s what we know so far: 1. Looks like this originated from the trivvy used in our ci/cd - https://github.com/search?q=repo%3ABerriAI%2Flitellm%20trivy... https://ramimac.me/trivy-teampcp/#phase-09 2. If you&amp;#39;re on the proxy docker, you were not impacted. We pin our versions in the requirements.txt 3. The package is in quarantine on pypi - this blocks all downloads. We are investigating the issue, and seeing how we can harden…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504535&quot; title=&quot;It was the PYPI_PUBLISH token which was in our github project as an env var, that got sent to trivvy. We have deleted all our pypi publishing tokens. Our accounts had 2fa, so it&amp;#39;s a bad token here. We&amp;#39;re reviewing our accounts, to see how we can make it more secure (trusted publishing via jwt tokens, move to a different pypi account, etc.).&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While the maintainer confirmed that Docker proxy users were unaffected due to version pinning, the incident has sparked a broader debate on the inherent lack of trust in modern software dependencies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47502858&quot; title=&quot;LiteLLM maintainer here, this is still an evolving situation, but here&amp;#39;s what we know so far: 1. Looks like this originated from the trivvy used in our ci/cd - https://github.com/search?q=repo%3ABerriAI%2Flitellm%20trivy... https://ramimac.me/trivy-teampcp/#phase-09 2. If you&amp;#39;re on the proxy docker, you were not impacted. We pin our versions in the requirements.txt 3. The package is in quarantine on pypi - this blocks all downloads. We are investigating the issue, and seeing how we can harden…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47503094&quot; title=&quot;This is the security shortcuts of the past 50 years coming back to bite us. Software has historically been a world where we all just trust each other. I think that’s coming to an end very soon.   We need sandboxing for sure, but it’s much bigger than that. Entire security models need to be rethought.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Users advocate for a shift toward &amp;#34;defense in depth&amp;#34; through mandatory sandboxing, VM isolation, and language-level module restrictions to prevent supply chain attacks from compromising entire development environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47502785&quot; title=&quot;We just can&amp;#39;t trust dependencies and dev setups. I wanted to say &amp;#39;anymore&amp;#39; but we never could. Dev containers were never good enough, too clumsy and too little isolation. We need to start working in full sandboxes with defence in depth that have real guardrails and UIs like vm isolation + container primitives and allow lists, egress filters, seccomp, gvisor and more but with much better usability. Its the same requirements we have for agent runtimes, lets use this momentum to make our dev…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47510924&quot; title=&quot;I think we really need to use sandboxes. Guix provides sandboxed environments by just flipping a switch. NixOS is in an ideal position to do the same, but for some reason they are regarded as &amp;#39;inconvenient&amp;#39;. Personally, I am a heavy user of Firejail and bwrap. We need defense in depth. If someone in the supply chain gets compromised, damage should be limited. It&amp;#39;s easy to patch the security model of Linux with userspaces, and even easier with eBPF, but the community is somehow stuck.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47502971&quot; title=&quot;We need programming languages where every imported module is in its own sandbox by default.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the severity, the community praised the maintainer&amp;#39;s transparent and human response during the crisis &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47505262&quot; title=&quot;This must be super stressful for you, but I do want to note your &amp;#39;I&amp;#39;m sorry for this.&amp;#39; It&amp;#39;s really human. It is so much better than, you know... &amp;#39;We regret any inconvenience and remain committed to recognising the importance of maintaining trust with our valued community and following the duration of the ongoing transient issue we will continue to drive alignment on a comprehensive remediation framework going forward.&amp;#39; Kudos to you. Stressful times, but I hope it helps to know that people are…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.jakesaunders.dev/is-anybody-else-bored-of-talking-about-ai/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Is anybody else bored of talking about AI?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.jakesaunders.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47508745&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;745 points · 526 comments · by jakelsaunders94&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Software engineer Jake Saunders argues that the tech community and management have become overly obsessed with AI tools rather than the actual products being built, urging a return to focusing on delivering value. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.jakesaunders.dev/is-anybody-else-bored-of-talking-about-ai/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Is anybody else bored of talking about AI?    URL Source: https://blog.jakesaunders.dev/is-anybody-else-bored-of-talking-about-ai/    Published Time: 2026-03-24T00:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Is anybody else bored of talking about AI?    [![Image 1: Avatar](https://blog.jakesaunders.dev/img/me_hu_3e0051f71570b6e4.jpg)](https://blog.jakesaunders.dev/)    # [Unfinished Side Projects](https://blog.jakesaunders.dev/)    ## Jake Saunders personal blog    1.  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion reflects a deep divide between those who view AI as a transformative &amp;#34;power tool&amp;#34; for high-skilled engineers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47509620&quot; title=&quot;This might sound like snark, but I truly don’t mean it that way. I think what’s interesting about AI, and why there’s so much conversation, is that in order to be a good user of AI, you have to really understand software development. All the people I work with who are getting the most value out of using AI to deliver software are people who are already very high-skilled engineers, and the more years of real experience they have, the better. I know some guys who were road warriors for many years…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47509328&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; AI is fine. The hype is annoying. I&amp;#39;m finding the detractors worse than the hype, because it seems like a certain subset of detractors [0] formed their opinion on AI in late 2022/early 2023 when ChatGPT came out (REALLY!?  Over 3 years ago!?) and then never updated their opinions since then.  They&amp;#39;ll say things like &amp;#39;why would I want to consume X amount of energy and Y amount of water just to get a wrong answer?&amp;#39; In other words, the people who think generative AI is an absolutely worthless…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt; and those who see it as an environmentally destructive &amp;#34;red herring&amp;#34; fueled by hype &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47508943&quot; title=&quot;AI is fine . The hype is annoying. What&amp;#39;s even worse though are the incredible amounts of money and energy that are being thrown at it, with no regard for the consequences, in times of record inequality and looming climate apocalypse. AI is the red herring that&amp;#39;ll waste all our attention until it&amp;#39;s too late.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47509058&quot; title=&quot;AI is one of the causes that climate change is accelerating, which is another in a long list of reasons to hate it.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that AI enables more ambitious work by automating menial tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47509831&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; But I also know that by using it I’m contributing to making my job redundant one day. I don&amp;#39;t see how this is the case if you&amp;#39;re anything more than a junior engineer... it unlocks so many possibilities. You can do so much more now. We are more limited by our ideas at this point than anything else. Why is the reaction of so many people, once their menial work gets automated, &amp;#39;oh no, my menial work is automated.&amp;#39; Why is it not &amp;#39;sweet, now I can do bigger/better/more ambitious things?&amp;#39; (You can…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others worry about long-term job redundancy and the &amp;#34;disastrous&amp;#34; lack of coherent implementation in sectors like academia &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47509693&quot; title=&quot;AI is starting to look like a net negative for humanity. I remember the early days of OpenAI. I was super excited about it. There was a new space to uncover and learn about. I was hopeful. Now I have this love/hate relationship with it. Claude Code is amazing. I use it everyday because it makes me so much more efficient at my job. But I also know that by using it I’m contributing to making my job redundant one day. At the same time I see how much resources we are wasting on AI. And to what end?…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47509064&quot; title=&quot;This is bad in tech. But at least we are (relatively) well equipped to deal with it. My partner teaches at a small college. These people are absolutely lost , with administration totally sold on the idea that &amp;#39;AI is the future&amp;#39; while lacking any kind of coherent theory about how to apply it to pedagogy. Administrators are typically uncritically buying into the hype, professors are a mix of compliant and (understandably) completely belligerent to the idea. Students are being told conflicting…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite disagreements over its utility and energy consumption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47509328&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; AI is fine. The hype is annoying. I&amp;#39;m finding the detractors worse than the hype, because it seems like a certain subset of detractors [0] formed their opinion on AI in late 2022/early 2023 when ChatGPT came out (REALLY!?  Over 3 years ago!?) and then never updated their opinions since then.  They&amp;#39;ll say things like &amp;#39;why would I want to consume X amount of energy and Y amount of water just to get a wrong answer?&amp;#39; In other words, the people who think generative AI is an absolutely worthless…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47509123&quot; title=&quot;Im not sure I follow. AI barely consumes energy compared to other industries and instead of focusing on the heavy hitters first wasting time on the climate impact on AI doesn’t seem useful&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, there is a shared exhaustion regarding the relentless hype cycle and its potential to distract from pressing global issues &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47508943&quot; title=&quot;AI is fine . The hype is annoying. What&amp;#39;s even worse though are the incredible amounts of money and energy that are being thrown at it, with no regard for the consequences, in times of record inequality and looming climate apocalypse. AI is the red herring that&amp;#39;ll waste all our attention until it&amp;#39;s too late.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47509693&quot; title=&quot;AI is starting to look like a net negative for humanity. I remember the early days of OpenAI. I was super excited about it. There was a new space to uncover and learn about. I was hopeful. Now I have this love/hate relationship with it. Claude Code is amazing. I use it everyday because it makes me so much more efficient at my job. But I also know that by using it I’m contributing to making my job redundant one day. At the same time I see how much resources we are wasting on AI. And to what end?…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://epoch.ai/frontiermath/open-problems/ramsey-hypergraphs&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Epoch confirms GPT5.4 Pro solved a frontier math open problem&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (epoch.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47497757&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;480 points · &lt;strong&gt;699 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by in-silico&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GPT-5.4 Pro has successfully solved a frontier Ramsey-style hypergraph problem, improving a known lower bound that experts estimated would take a human mathematician months to solve. Other models, including Gemini 3.1 Pro and Claude Opus 4.6, also solved the problem using a new testing scaffold. &lt;a href=&quot;https://epoch.ai/frontiermath/open-problems/ramsey-hypergraphs&quot; title=&quot;Title: A Ramsey-style Problem on Hypergraphs    URL Source: https://epoch.ai/frontiermath/open-problems/ramsey-hypergraphs    Published Time: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 03:37:54 GMT    Markdown Content:  **Solution Update**: This problem has been solved! A solution was first elicited by Kevin Barreto and Liam Price, using GPT-5.4 Pro. This solution was confirmed by problem contributor Will Brian, and will be written up for publication. A full transcript of the original conversation with GPT-5.4 Pro can be found…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The confirmation of an AI solving a frontier math problem has shifted some skeptics into &amp;#34;believers,&amp;#34; though many remain divided on whether this represents genuine innovation or merely an exhaustive statistical search &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47498568&quot; title=&quot;I have long said I am an AI doubter until AI could print out the answers to hard problems or ones requiring tons of innovation. Assuming this is verified to be correct (not by AI) then I just became a believer. I would like to see a few more AI inventions to know for sure, but wow, it really is a new and exciting world. I really hope we use this intelligence resource to make the world better.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47499766&quot; title=&quot;I am kind of amazed at how many commenters respond to this result by confidently asserting that LLMs will never generate &amp;#39;truly novel&amp;#39; ideas or problem solutions. &amp;gt; AI is a remixer; it remixes all known ideas together. It won&amp;#39;t come up with new ideas &amp;gt; it&amp;#39;s not because the model is figuring out something new &amp;gt; LLMs will NEVER be able to do that, because it doesn&amp;#39;t exist It&amp;#39;s not enough to say &amp;#39;it will never be able to do X because it&amp;#39;s not in the training data,&amp;#39; because we have countless…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47498621&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s less of solving a problem, but trying every single solution until one works. Exhaustive search pretty much. It&amp;#39;s pretty much how all the hard problems are solved by AI from my experience.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that LLMs are &amp;#34;remixers&amp;#34; that lack true understanding, while others contend that human intelligence itself may just be a more complex version of &amp;#34;trying stuff until it works&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47498699&quot; title=&quot;AI is a remixer; it remixes all known ideas together. It won&amp;#39;t come up with new ideas though; the LLMs just predict the most likely next token based on the context. That means the group of characters it outputs must have been quite common in the past. It won&amp;#39;t add a new group of characters it has never seen before on its own.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47498700&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know why I am still perpetually shocked that the default assumption is that humans are somehow unique. It&amp;#39;s this pervasive belief that underlies so much discussion around what it means to be intelligent. The null hypothesis goes out the window. People constantly make comments like &amp;#39;well it&amp;#39;s just trying a bunch of stuff until something works&amp;#39; and it seems that they do not pause for a moment to consider whether or not that also applies to humans. If they do, they apply it in only the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47500489&quot; title=&quot;LLMs can generate anything by design. LLMs can&amp;#39;t understand what they are generating so it may be true, it may be wrong, it may be novel or it may be known thing. It doesn&amp;#39;t discern between them, just looks for the best statistical fit. The core of the issue lies in our human language and our human assumptions. We humans have implicitly assigned phrases &amp;#39;truly novel&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;solving unsolved math problem&amp;#39; a certain meaning in our heads. Some of us at least, think that truly novel means something…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite claims that AI is limited to re-hashing training data, some users report the models are already demonstrating &amp;#34;novel&amp;#34; problem-solving in specialized fields like software engineering &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47499766&quot; title=&quot;I am kind of amazed at how many commenters respond to this result by confidently asserting that LLMs will never generate &amp;#39;truly novel&amp;#39; ideas or problem solutions. &amp;gt; AI is a remixer; it remixes all known ideas together. It won&amp;#39;t come up with new ideas &amp;gt; it&amp;#39;s not because the model is figuring out something new &amp;gt; LLMs will NEVER be able to do that, because it doesn&amp;#39;t exist It&amp;#39;s not enough to say &amp;#39;it will never be able to do X because it&amp;#39;s not in the training data,&amp;#39; because we have countless…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47500056&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been working on a utility that lets me &amp;#39;see through&amp;#39; app windows on macOS [1] (I was a dev on Apple&amp;#39;s Xcode team and have a strong understanding of how to do this efficiently using private APIs). I wondered how Claude Code would approach the problem. I fully expected it to do something most human engineers would do: brute-force with ScreenCaptureKit. It almost instantly figured out that it didn&amp;#39;t have to &amp;#39;see through&amp;#39; anything and (correctly) dismissed ScreenCaptureKit due to the…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some fear a future of &amp;#34;okayish&amp;#34; AI-generated content, others point to the rapid trajectory from basic arithmetic errors to solving complex proofs as evidence of continued exponential growth &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47499227&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I don&amp;#39;t see this getting better. We went from 2 + 7 = 11 to &amp;#39;solved a frontier math problem&amp;#39; in 3 years, yet people don&amp;#39;t think this will improve?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47499552&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;it really is a new and exciting world... The point is that from now on, there will be nothing really new, nothing really original, nothing really exciting. Just endless stream of re-hashed old stuff that is just okayish.. Like an AI spotify playlist, it will keep you in chains (aka engaged) without actually making you like really happy or good. It would be like living in a virtual world, but without having anything nice about living in such a world.. We have given up everything nice that human…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/03/introducing-apple-business-a-new-all-in-one-platform-for-businesses-of-all-sizes/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apple Business&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (apple.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504112&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;728 points · 434 comments · by soheilpro&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple is launching Apple Business on April 14, a unified platform that combines mobile device management, professional email and calendar services, and new advertising tools for Apple Maps to help companies of all sizes manage operations and reach local customers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/03/introducing-apple-business-a-new-all-in-one-platform-for-businesses-of-all-sizes/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Introducing Apple Business — a new all‑in‑one platform for businesses of all sizes    URL Source: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/03/introducing-apple-business-a-new-all-in-one-platform-for-businesses-of-all-sizes/    Published Time: 2026-03-24Z    Markdown Content:  # Introducing Apple Business — a new all-in-one platform for businesses of all sizes - Apple    *   [Apple](https://www.apple.com/)  *         *   [Store](https://www.apple.com/us/shop/goto/store)        *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple&amp;#39;s expansion into the small business market is seen by some as a major threat to Microsoft’s dominance due to the appeal of low-cost, serviceable hardware bundled with integrated device management and support &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47505054&quot; title=&quot;599$ serviceable MacBooks, easy to use MDM, Cloud, Email and Calendar and flat-fee AppleCare all baked in? New businesses under 50 employees are going to eat this up like there&amp;#39;s no tomorrow. I&amp;#39;d be scared if I was certain Redmond corporation who makes their money on 365 and Intune.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47505252&quot; title=&quot;*499$ with an EDU discount which definitely means they have margin for business deals. Revenge of the Mac. Theirs simply no reason for any normal person to buy anything else. The year of Linux is deferred yet again.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue that Apple is late to the sector and that its enterprise software experience—specifically regarding domain migration and account management—remains buggy, frustrating, and poorly supported compared to established competitors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47505700&quot; title=&quot;I recently tried setting Apple Business Manager for our ≈20 people SME. The first step was &amp;#39;Domain Lock/Capture&amp;#39; which takes over all Apple accounts for a specific domain. I&amp;#39;ve never had a worse experience from Apple. The process is buggy, filled with foot-guns and dead ends. It expects huge amounts of work from users who have had their account for more than a few weeks and are expected to remove a lot of their personal data before their account can be migrated (e.g. do you know how to delete…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504942&quot; title=&quot;Apple&amp;#39;s really late to this.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While there is praise for Apple&amp;#39;s office suite&amp;#39;s usability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47505580&quot; title=&quot;Apple&amp;#39;s office suite is my favorite I&amp;#39;ve ever used, and it&amp;#39;s not close. After that, old copies of MSOffice. Next-best would be a hodgepodge of the lighter options on Linux and such. Gnumeric, Abiword, that sort of thing. Not great, but at least they&amp;#39;re light on resources and easy to use. Distantly after that, LibreOffice. Then, modern MSOffice in last place. The only reason I&amp;#39;d count any of them as &amp;#39;worse&amp;#39; than modern MSOffice is that ~perfect office compatibility and a bulletproof excuse when…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that Microsoft 365 and Azure remain the true industry standards, and that Apple&amp;#39;s entry-level hardware may suffer from insufficient RAM and storage for long-term business use &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47505136&quot; title=&quot;Microsoft is a giant enterprise software company that also publishes Candy Crush and Call of Duty. Intune and Windows are &amp;#39;nice to have&amp;#39; but are not the business-business. The business is 365 (which runs on Macs and is worlds better than Apple&amp;#39;s office suite + Apple&amp;#39;s hosted email is god awful) and Azure.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47506329&quot; title=&quot;Serviceable != upgradable or long-lasting. So many people are going to get burned by the hypnotism of these Neos. They&amp;#39;re going to be gateways into being traded in within 2-3 years to get something with more RAM and storage when their owners find out how much they struggle with basic tasks due to insufficient RAM and storage. If you actually go on Best Buy or Micro Center websites and look at street prices you&amp;#39;ll realize that the Neo isn&amp;#39;t actually that disruptive. The trackpad is mid. I&amp;#39;ve…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/24/tech/meta-new-mexico-trial-jury-deliberation&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Jury finds Meta liable in case over child sexual exploitation on its platforms&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cnn.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47509984&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;487 points · &lt;strong&gt;529 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by billfor&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A New Mexico jury found Meta liable for failing to protect children from sexual predators on its platforms, ordering the company to pay $375 million in damages for deceptive trade practices. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/24/tech/meta-new-mexico-trial-jury-deliberation&quot; title=&quot;Jury finds Meta liable in case over child sexual exploitation on its platforms | CNN Business    A jury on Tuesday found Meta violated New Mexico law in a case accusing it of failing to warn users about the dangers of its platforms and protect children from sexual predators.    Ad Feedback    ### CNN values your feedback    1. How relevant is this ad to you?    2. Did you encounter any technical issues?    [ ]    Video player was slow to load content  [ ]    Video content never loaded  [ ]    Ad froze or did not…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users view the $375 million verdict as a mere &amp;#34;cost of doing business&amp;#34; that fails to truly penalize Meta &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47521228&quot; title=&quot;375 million awarded at $5000 per child harmed. Implying that only 75,000 children were harmed. Got away with it again, good profit, will repeat.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47521554&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s not how the legal framework in society works. Victims are compensated. The business pays. The precedent of wrongdoing is specifically established which means that further infringements can be quickly resolved. The legal system does not seek to destroy the business, or individual criminal. Instead it wants them to be able to continue doing their other non-criminal stuff.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others warn that such legal pressure is being used to justify the rollback of end-to-end encryption and the implementation of invasive ID verification &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47510658&quot; title=&quot;Many will cheer for any case that hurts Meta without reading the details, but we should be aware that these cases are one of the key reasons why companies are backtracking from features like end-to-end encryption: &amp;gt; The New Mexico case also raised concerns that allowing teens to use end-to-end encryption on Instagram chats — a privacy measure that blocks anyone other than sender and receiver from viewing a conversation — could make it harder for law enforcement to catch predators. Midway…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47515567&quot; title=&quot;The same company intentionally driving minors towards this content (despite claiming to care about them) is also lobbying in secrecy for requiring all of us to scan our ID and face in order to use our phones and computers. Their stated reason? Child safety. Their actual reason? You can figure that out.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47515641&quot; title=&quot;Maybe I&amp;#39;m just getting old and cynical but, while I think current social media is bad for children, I&amp;#39;m very suspicious of the current international agreement that it&amp;#39;s time to take action, especially with all the ID verification coming from multiple avenues&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant debate over whether child safety can be managed through device-level locks and parental moderation rather than platform-wide surveillance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47511283&quot; title=&quot;The correct nuance here is... * Classifying accounts as child accounts (moderated by a parent) * Allowing account moderators to review content in the account that is moderated (including assigning other moderation tools of choice) In call cases transparency and enabling consumer choice should be the core focus. Additionally: by default treat everyone online as an adult.  Parents that allow their kids online like that without supervision / some setting that the user agent is operated by a child…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47511316&quot; title=&quot;Theoretically we don&amp;#39;t actually need proof of age. Websites need to know when the user is attempting to create an account or log in from a child-locked device. Parents need to make sure their kids only have child-locked devices. Vendors need to make sure they don&amp;#39;t sell unlocked devices to kids.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue that age-gating features for minors inevitably creates a &amp;#34;privacy wormhole&amp;#34; by forcing adults to surrender sensitive identification data to corporations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47511216&quot; title=&quot;I’m actually okay with not letting under age people use e2e. I’m not okay with blocking everyone.   I have 2 kids.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47511244&quot; title=&quot;I understand the concern but then to make this available for adults you now have to provide proof of age to companies, which opens up another can of privacy worms.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cg547ljepvzo&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mystery jump in oil trading ahead of Trump post draws scrutiny&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504060&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;570 points · 392 comments · by psim1&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regulators are investigating a sudden surge in oil trading activity that occurred immediately before a social media post by Donald Trump impacted market prices. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cg547ljepvzo&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.wsj.com&amp;amp;#x2F;livecoverage&amp;amp;#x2F;stock-market-today-dow-sp-500-nasdaq-03-24-2026&amp;amp;#x2F;card&amp;amp;#x2F;mystery-jump-in-oil-trading-ahead-of-trump-post-draws-scrutiny-56sgwdXtlOlonqIKDsL6&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.wsj.com&amp;amp;#x2F;livecoverage&amp;amp;#x2F;stock-market-today-dow-sp-5...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion reflects deep skepticism regarding the legality of recent oil trading activity, with some users suggesting the U.S. government may have even encouraged the trades as a policy tool to shape market prices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504573&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m growing pessimistic that this kind of activity + the egregious presidential-level crypto scams will never see justice. What&amp;#39;s the path for that, really?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504852&quot; title=&quot;1. By a show of hands, who was surprised that the cataclysmic warnings of the weekend subsided into talk of diplomacy on Monday? 2. Let’s hypothesize the US gov’t or allies did pre-release this info to traders as a policy tool, inviting them to sell oil profitably, shaping the later price action . In a practical sense they may have brought more speculators to the short side than otherwise would have been there; is that scenario really beyond the pale? 3. News of war and sovereign relations on…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that justice for such profiteering is unlikely through traditional legal channels, others believe accountability will eventually come through a &amp;#34;pendulum swing&amp;#34; in future elections or a chaotic collapse of the current social and economic order &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504806&quot; title=&quot;I think it&amp;#39;s likely that they&amp;#39;ll see justice in a chaotic way , ie not connected to the specific crime.  Most likely outcome is that they make huge paper profits that are then absolutely worthless because the dollar collapses and the property rights that enforce the wealth they gained from these transactions disappear as the government is toppled.  Another likely outcome is that they get in the habit of doing criminal things that piss people off, piss the wrong person off, and then get offed.…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47505094&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not that complicated. Elect a Democrat in 2028 who will nominate a strong AG, not a useless ditherer like Garland. What a disgraceful tenure he had. If he was going to take so long to bring charges he should have just avoided it. Instead he takes 3 years to bring all these charges which naturally look like election interference and as such are paused until they choke the election away and the new justice department kills all the cases. Don&amp;#39;t elect a geriatric compromise candidate. The…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant debate over the geopolitical implications of the conflict, with participants warning that a failure to find a diplomatic off-ramp could lead to a strategic defeat for the U.S. and its allies or a global economic catastrophe &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504980&quot; title=&quot;if a ground invasion goes they will destroy oil trade and everyone is screwed. The war should not be won. it should be ended before everyone loses.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47505303&quot; title=&quot;I think you’re just seeing the logic of US defense by offense, and the reason why the excursion was launched as it was three weeks ago. If you step back, in 1979 Iran launched a revolution that had an avowed goal of “death to America”. If the Iranians play the kinetic scenario to the bitter end, they simply are demonstrating this was not mere poetry and there never was any other off-ramp, just tactically deciding at what relative strength these two systems will collide. So Iran loses by…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47505090&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; The war should not be won. it should be ended before everyone loses. My analysis and my comment I linked to agrees. And that is a strategic victory for Iran, Russia, China and a defeat for Israel, and the US. The worst will be the Gulf States hostages of their dueling stock pile of defense missiles running out...to which they will have to queue for, with US DOD at the front of the queue.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/epic-games-said-tuesday-that-it-will-lay-off-more-than-1000-employees-2026-03-24/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Epic Games to cut more than 1k jobs as Fortnite usage falls&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (reuters.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47503810&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;370 points · &lt;strong&gt;566 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by doughnutstracks&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Epic Games is laying off more than 1,000 employees as the company faces declining usage and revenue from its flagship title, Fortnite. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/epic-games-said-tuesday-that-it-will-lay-off-more-than-1000-employees-2026-03-24/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.epicgames.com&amp;amp;#x2F;site&amp;amp;#x2F;en-US&amp;amp;#x2F;news&amp;amp;#x2F;todays-layoffs&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.epicgames.com&amp;amp;#x2F;site&amp;amp;#x2F;en-US&amp;amp;#x2F;news&amp;amp;#x2F;todays-layoffs&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters expressed shock that Epic Games is losing money despite the massive success of Fortnite, attributing the deficit to &amp;#34;vanity projects&amp;#34; and expensive exclusivity deals intended to challenge Steam &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47507965&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; &amp;#39;We&amp;#39;re spending significantly more than we&amp;#39;re making, and  we have to make major cuts to keep the company funded,&amp;#39; he  said. Sorry, HOW?!? How can a company like Epic games with one of the most successful gaming products of the last few decades be losing money with a product that is so mature? Almost every other games developer would love to be in their position on Fortnite but they&amp;#39;ve somehow turned that into a loss making proposition?!? I&amp;#39;m baffled.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47508047&quot; title=&quot;They aren&amp;#39;t losing money on Fortnite, they&amp;#39;re losing money on vanity projects like the Epic Game Store where they spend tens of millions of dollars for exclusivity deals with developers, and give away free games to try to poach Steam users with an otherwise inferior product. Unfortunately it is their employees that are paying the price of leadership making it rain with their overflowing coffers they couldn&amp;#39;t help but burn.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47503736&quot; title=&quot;I’ve wondered how much money was burned on Tim Sweeneys quixotic quest to re-create the Steam store. I know a lot of people who would religiously download the “free games” but never spent a cent.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that the Epic Games Store (EGS) offers a faster technical experience, others contend that Epic failed by trying to &amp;#34;trap&amp;#34; users with free games rather than building a platform with Steam&amp;#39;s superior social and integration features &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47508228&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s still funny to me that they would rather burn 9 figures in cash on these silly deals to try and &amp;#39;trap&amp;#39; gamers on their platform instead of just... I don&amp;#39;t know... making a better platform? The reason nobody competes with Steam is simply the sheer number of integration and platform features that make it easy to buy, play and share games with my friends. It&amp;#39;s not that hard, stop trying to &amp;#39;force&amp;#39; me to use your platform. Just make it a nice experience.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47508553&quot; title=&quot;In my experience, the Epic Games Store downloads faster, installs more efficiently, and launches games faster than Steam. The social features I actually use (i.e., add a friend, join them in a game) work fine. I&amp;#39;m not aware of any features Steam has that EGS lacks that I actually use frequently (Valve&amp;#39;s VR, streaming tech, and Proton are great, but I don&amp;#39;t use those frequently). It&amp;#39;s not just me, many indie game developers are also big fans of EGS (most recent example that comes to mind are…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47509662&quot; title=&quot;Steam does. That&amp;#39;s why they&amp;#39;re the undefeated king. This applies to everything. If you see a product category where users are legitimately unhappy; then enter it, build something actually good, you&amp;#39;ll be the biggest and richest in no-time.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the layoffs, the CEO was credited for taking responsibility in the announcement, though users noted that the company&amp;#39;s struggle highlights the difficulty of maintaining &amp;#34;infinite growth&amp;#34; in the volatile gaming industry &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47508027&quot; title=&quot;Because games is simply not a particularly profitable industry. There&amp;#39;s a reason why Valve moved on from making games to being a digital landlord.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47506388&quot; title=&quot;I am not Tim Sweeney&amp;#39;s biggest fan. I know he and his company have many detractors. Please read this comment with that in mind, because while I don&amp;#39;t love them, I also think that as layoff announcements go, this is good. No beating around the bush, explicitly NOT blaming AI, taking responsibility, taking care of those impacted. If you are gonna do it, this is as good as it can get. I think the reality is that Epic got big because of Fortnite but nothing lasts forever. They would have been…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.answer.ai/posts/2026-03-12-so-where-are-all-the-ai-apps.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;So where are all the AI apps?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (answer.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47503006&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;448 points · 422 comments · by tanelpoder&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Analysis of PyPI data shows that AI has not yet caused a universal surge in software productivity; instead, the &amp;#34;AI effect&amp;#34; is concentrated in a high volume of updates for popular packages specifically focused on building AI tools. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.answer.ai/posts/2026-03-12-so-where-are-all-the-ai-apps.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: So where are all the AI apps? – Answer.AI    URL Source: https://www.answer.ai/posts/2026-03-12-so-where-are-all-the-ai-apps.html    Markdown Content:  Fans of vibecoding and agentic tools say they are 2x as productive, 10x as productive – maybe 100x as productive! Someone [built an entire web browser from scratch](https://cursor.com/blog/scaling-agents). Amazing!    So, skeptics reasonably ask, where are all the apps? If AI users are becoming (let’s be conservative) merely 2x more productive,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The lack of visible AI-driven software is largely attributed to a shift toward &amp;#34;highly personalized&amp;#34; tools that solve specific individual problems but are never published because they lack general appeal or a commercial &amp;#34;moat&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47503309&quot; title=&quot;I deleted vscode and replaced with a hyper personal dashboard that combines information from everywhere. I have a news feed, work tab for managing issues/PRs, markdown editor with folders, calendar, AI powered buttons all over the place (I click a button, it does something interesting with Claude code I can&amp;#39;t do programmatically). Why don&amp;#39;t I share it? Because it&amp;#39;s highly personal, others would find it doesn&amp;#39;t fit their own workflow.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47503973&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It is incredibly easy now to get an idea to the prototype stage Yup. And for most purposes, that&amp;#39;s enough . An app does not have to be productized and shipped to general audience to be useful. In fact, if your goal is to solve some specific problem for yourself, your friends/family, community or your team, then the &amp;#39;last step&amp;#39; you mention - the one that &amp;#39;takes majority of time and effort&amp;#39; - is entirely unnecessary, irrelevant, and a waste of time . The productivity boost is there, but it&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504105&quot; title=&quot;I think this article is making a pretty big assumption: that people making things with AI are also going to be publishing them. And that&amp;#39;s just the opposite of what should be expected, for the general case. Like I&amp;#39;ve been making things, and making changes to things, but I haven&amp;#39;t published any of that because, well they&amp;#39;re pretty specific to my needs. There are also things which I won&amp;#39;t consider publishing for now, even if generally useful because, well the moat has moved from execution effort…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While AI has significantly lowered the barrier for prototyping and personal utility apps, critics argue that the &amp;#34;last 10%&amp;#34; of production-ready engineering remains a bottleneck that prevents most &amp;#34;vibe-coded&amp;#34; projects from launching &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47503390&quot; title=&quot;It is incredibly easy now to get an idea to the prototype stage, but making it production-ready still needs boring old software engineering skills. I know countless people who followed the &amp;#39;I&amp;#39;ll vibe code my own business&amp;#39; trend, and a few of them did get pretty far, but ultimately not a single one actually launched. Anyone who has been doing this professionally will tell you that the &amp;#39;last step&amp;#39; is what takes the majority of time and effort.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47503441&quot; title=&quot;AI makes the first 90% of writing an app super easy and the last 10% way harder because you have all the subtle issues of a big codebase but none of the familiarity. Most people give up there.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Consequently, there is a sharp disagreement over whether the recent surge in App Store submissions represents meaningful economic productivity or merely a deluge of &amp;#34;useless slop&amp;#34; and LLM wrappers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504047&quot; title=&quot;Maybe the top 15,000 PyPi packages isn&amp;#39;t the best way to measure this? Apparently new iOS app submissions jumped by 24% last year: &amp;gt; According to Appfigures Explorer, Apple&amp;#39;s App Store saw 557K new app submissions in 2025, a whopping 24% increase from 2024, and the first meaningful increase since 2016&amp;#39;s all-time high of 1M apps. The chart shows stagnant new iOS app submissions until AI. Here&amp;#39;s a month by month bar chart from 2019 to Feb 2026:…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47503439&quot; title=&quot;Technical people (which is by far the minority of people out there) building personal apps to scratch an itch is one thing. But based on the hype (100x productivity!), there should be a deluge of high quality mobile apps, Saas offerings, etc. There is a huge profit incentive to create quality software at a low price. Yet, the majority of new apps and services that I see are all AI ecosystem stuff. Wrappers around LLMs, or tools to use LLMs to create software. But I’m not really seeing the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47505428&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Apparently new iOS app submissions jumped by 24% last year: The amount of useless slop in the app store doesn&amp;#39;t matter. There are no new and useful apps made with AI - apps that contribute to productivity of the economy as whole. The trade and fiscal deficits are both high and growing as is corporate indebtedness - these are the true measures for economic failure and they all agree on it. AI is a debt and energy guzzling endeavor which sucks the capital juice out of the economy in return for…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47505891&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; There are no new and useful apps made with AI - apps that contribute to productivity of the economy as whole. This is flat-earther level. It&amp;#39;s like an environmentalist saying that nothing made with fossil fuels contributes to productivity. But they don&amp;#39;t say that because they know it&amp;#39;s not true. There are so many valid gripes to have with LLMs, pick literally any of them. The idea that a single line of generated code can&amp;#39;t possibly be productivity net positive is nonsensical. And if one line…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://smu160.github.io/posts/missile-defense-is-np-complete/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Missile defense is NP-complete&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (smu160.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47501950&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;382 points · &lt;strong&gt;424 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by O3marchnative&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Weapon-Target Assignment problem in missile defense is mathematically NP-complete due to nonlinearities and diminishing returns. While modern algorithms can solve these complex allocations quickly, the primary challenges remain limited interceptor inventories, tracking vulnerabilities, and the attacker&amp;#39;s ability to overwhelm systems with cheap decoys. &lt;a href=&quot;https://smu160.github.io/posts/missile-defense-is-np-complete/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Missile Defense is NP-Complete | An Optimization Odyssey    URL Source: https://smu160.github.io/posts/missile-defense-is-np-complete/    Published Time: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 22:51:49 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Missile Defense is NP-Complete | An Optimization Odyssey  [An Optimization Odyssey](https://smu160.github.io/)    [Posts](https://smu160.github.io/)[About](https://smu160.github.io/about)    # Missile Defense is NP-Complete    March 24, 2026     optimization  NP-complete  missile-defense …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights that missile defense is fundamentally asymmetric, as attackers can use low-cost decoys and mass-produced drones to overwhelm expensive interceptors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47502437&quot; title=&quot;Two more sobering axes to introduce: cost and manufacturing capability. Numbers are hard to find for obvious security reasons, but using the numbers most optimistic to the defender[0] suggests an adversary using a Fatah type hypersonic is spending 1/3rd the cost of an Arrow interceptor, and is launching missiles that are produced at a much faster rate.  Interception is deeply asymmetric in favor of the attacker. [0] https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-82314...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47502274&quot; title=&quot;Add multiple decoys and the missile math tends to become an argument for the importance of preemption. Han shot first for a good reason.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47508086&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t see how drones don&amp;#39;t make all conflicts into WW1. 100 Billion dollars buys about 3.3 million Shaheds assuming the manufacturing is not made more efficient. There are many questions on whether its possible to spend 100 billion dollars on Shaheds, or launch all of them. But this is more than enough to destroy any logistics and transportation infrastructure necessary for a ground invasion. There are many many countries who can afford 100 billion dollars for stored military equipment that…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that active conflicts provide invaluable real-world data to refine defensive systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47502592&quot; title=&quot;This is absolutely true, but there is a strong counterpoint: You also learn the limits of your own systems and how to operate them most effectively yourself (and better than adversaries can, too). Just to pick a recent example: Russian air defense in the early stages of the Ukraine war was dismal (more specifically: defense against big, slow drones like Bayraktar), despite having sufficient AA capability &amp;#39;on paper&amp;#39;-- the war allowed them to visibly improve. I&amp;#39;d expect much more value from…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47502496&quot; title=&quot;That seems like an acceptable trade off to get some real world experience with what works and what doesn&amp;#39;t with regards to massed drones and swarming.  There is a lot we can learn in this conflict with relatively low stakes&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that adversaries gain a strategic advantage by observing these capabilities to exploit weaknesses in future engagements &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47502332&quot; title=&quot;The author explains that this problem is actually adversarial, in the sense that the attacker gets to observe defenses and allocate warheads and decoys accordingly. Thinking of our current circumstances, this suggests another cost of war: our offensive capabilities, as well as our defensive capabilities become more observable. Our adversaries are studying our strengths and weaknesses in Iran, and they will have a much improved game plan for countering us in future conflicts.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47503170&quot; title=&quot;The Iranians just hit an F35 with a proverbial box of scraps they put together in a cave. The Chinese military must have experienced collective euphoria when they saw that.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, there is a consensus that defense must achieve near-perfection to be effective, as even a single breakthrough can cause catastrophic economic or physical damage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47503025&quot; title=&quot;There is an assumption here that the value in improving defenses is the same as improving offensive weapons. That is not the case in the assymetry that drones provide and Russia is the first example. Russia has not been able to improve AA capabilities to the point where it&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;safe&amp;#39;, for any definition of the word, neither has Israel. Israel and Gulf states often tout over 90% interception rate yet it&amp;#39;s really at the mercy of Iran to not target their most vulnerable sites. If Iran was routinely…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://videojs.org/blog/videojs-v10-beta-hello-world-again&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: I took back Video.js after 16 years and we rewrote it to be 88% smaller&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (videojs.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47506713&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;644 points · 137 comments · by Heff&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After being reacquired from private equity, Video.js has been rebuilt by its original creator and a new team of maintainers to be 88% smaller and faster in its latest v10 beta. &lt;a href=&quot;https://videojs.org/blog/videojs-v10-beta-hello-world-again&quot; title=&quot;What do you do when private equity buys your old company and fires the maintainers of the popular open source project you started over a decade ago? You reboot it, and bring along some new friends to do it.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Video.js is used by billions of people every month, on sites like Amazon.com, Linkedin, and Dropbox, and yet it wasn’t in great shape. A skeleton crew of maintainers were doing their best with a dated architecture, but it needed more. So Sam from Plyr, Rahim from Vidstack, and Wes and…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Video.js rewrite was praised for its modular &amp;#34;feature-array&amp;#34; architecture, though contributors admit they are still refining how to handle complex state dependencies between independent features &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47511871&quot; title=&quot;The feature-array approach to createPlayer is smart. We did something similar splitting a monolith into per-feature packages and the hardest part wasn&amp;#39;t the split itself, it was figuring out where the boundaries go. Two features look independent until you realize they share some piece of state that neither wants to own. Curious how they handle cross-feature state deps here.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47512095&quot; title=&quot;Hey VJS core contributor here. We definitely feel that concern and we also don&amp;#39;t yet have a silver bullet formalized. I suspect we&amp;#39;ll need some kind of alternate implementations or feature augmentation at some point. We&amp;#39;re currently doing things in a bit more ad hoc way, such as the interrelationship between PiP and Fullscreen (see, e.g.: https://github.com/videojs/v10/blob/main/packages/core/src/d... ).&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users questioned the necessity of a library over native HTML5 elements, others noted that Video.js is essential for navigating cross-browser inconsistencies and supporting legacy environments like older Smart TVs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47513181&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve never used video.js, and the site/advertising seems to be fairly oriented towards people who have used it or are familiar with it. I had one question I couldn&amp;#39;t answer reading the site: what makes this different from the native html video element? AFAICT just the transport controls?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47513478&quot; title=&quot;it just doesn’t work in every environment. every browser version has it’s own issues and edge cases. If you need stable video player or want streaming features you should use it. P.S i built movie streaming and tv broadcasting player for country of Georgia and supported environments from 2009 LG Smart TVs to modern browsers.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical discussions also touched on the trade-offs between HLS and DASH streaming formats &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47512197&quot; title=&quot;I am curious, why would anyone pick HLS over Dash in these days? Granted, my knowledge on the matter is rather limited, but I had some long running streams (weeks) and with HLS the playlist became quite large while with dash, the mpd was as small as it gets.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, reported bugs with the new site&amp;#39;s seeking functionality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47513409&quot; title=&quot;Seeking on the main https://videojs.org/ page doesn&amp;#39;t work for me on chromium. Throws Uncaught (in promise) TypeError: AbortSignal.any is not a function on   volume-slider-data-attrs.BOpj3NK1.js&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, and suggestions to distribute the player as a web component &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47511544&quot; title=&quot;Out of curiousity, why not distribute this as a webcomponent? It&amp;#39;s a perfect use case for it - a semantic object that has built in controls / chrome.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://newsroom.arm.com/blog/introducing-arm-agi-cpu&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Arm AGI CPU&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (newsroom.arm.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47506251&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;422 points · 309 comments · by RealityVoid&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Arm has launched the Arm AGI CPU, its first self-designed silicon product, specifically engineered to orchestrate high-density agentic AI workloads and data center infrastructure with significantly higher performance per rack than traditional x86 systems. &lt;a href=&quot;https://newsroom.arm.com/blog/introducing-arm-agi-cpu&quot; title=&quot;Title: Announcing Arm AGI CPU: The silicon foundation for the agentic AI cloud era    URL Source: https://newsroom.arm.com/blog/introducing-arm-agi-cpu    Published Time: 2026-03-24T16:55:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  Today, [Arm is announcing the Arm AGI CPU](https://newsroom.arm.com/news/arm-agi-cpu-launch), a new class of production-ready silicon built on the [Arm Neoverse](https://www.arm.com/products/silicon-ip-cpu/neoverse/) platform and designed to power the next generation of AI…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary focus of the discussion is Arm&amp;#39;s controversial choice to name their new CPU &amp;#34;AGI,&amp;#34; which stands for &amp;#34;Agentic AI Infrastructure&amp;#34; rather than &amp;#34;Artificial General Intelligence&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47508062&quot; title=&quot;The name of this CPU is bordering on securities fraud.  When people see the term &amp;#39;AGI&amp;#39; now, they are assuming &amp;#39;Artificial General Intelligence&amp;#39;, not &amp;#39;Agentic AI Infrastructure&amp;#39;. Of course people don&amp;#39;t realize that, and people will buy ARM stock thinking they&amp;#39;ve cracked AGI. The people running Arm absolutely know this, so this name is what we in the industry call a &amp;#39;lie&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47506467&quot; title=&quot;AGI = Agentic AI Infrastructure In case you were thinking about some other abbreviation...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue the name is a deceptive marketing tactic designed to mislead investors, while others contend that the term AGI has already been degraded into a generic buzzword &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47508062&quot; title=&quot;The name of this CPU is bordering on securities fraud.  When people see the term &amp;#39;AGI&amp;#39; now, they are assuming &amp;#39;Artificial General Intelligence&amp;#39;, not &amp;#39;Agentic AI Infrastructure&amp;#39;. Of course people don&amp;#39;t realize that, and people will buy ARM stock thinking they&amp;#39;ve cracked AGI. The people running Arm absolutely know this, so this name is what we in the industry call a &amp;#39;lie&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47507269&quot; title=&quot;This is like naming your kid World President Smith.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47508262&quot; title=&quot;Considering AGI has been degraded into a generic feelgood marketing word, I can&amp;#39;t wait to get my AGI-scented deodorant.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond the branding, users debated whether current LLMs have already reached a form of AGI, with some arguing they surpass human intelligence in many areas and others dismissing them as &amp;#34;glorified text predictors&amp;#34; lacking reasoning capabilities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47508359&quot; title=&quot;If you showed someone what our computers can do with the latest LLMs now to someone 5 years ago they would probably say it sure looks a lot like AGI. We have to keep defining AGI upwards or nitpick it to show that we haven&amp;#39;t achieved it. I would argue that LLMs are actually smarter than the majority of humans right now.  LLMs do not have quite the agency that humans have, but their intelligence is pretty decent. We don&amp;#39;t have clear ASI yet, but we definitely are in a AGI-era. I think we are…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47508378&quot; title=&quot;Ok, but it&amp;#39;s not AGI.  People five years ago would have been wrong.  People who don&amp;#39;t have all the information are often wrong about things. ETA: You updated your comment, which is fine but I wanted to reply to your points. &amp;gt; I would argue that LLMs are actually smarter than the majority of humans right now. LLMs do not have quite the agency that humans have, but their intelligence is pretty decent. I would actually argue that they are decidedly not smarter than even dumb humans right now. …&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Notably, the thread highlights that this release marks the first time in 35 years that Arm is delivering its own silicon products &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47507519&quot; title=&quot;I think the interesting bit is actually this: For the first time in our more than 35-year history, Arm is delivering its own silicon products&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/24/laguardia-airplane-pilots-safety-concerns-crash&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LaGuardia pilots raised safety alarms months before deadly runway crash&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theguardian.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47503965&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;396 points · 309 comments · by m_fayer&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pilots at LaGuardia Airport reportedly raised safety concerns months before a fatal runway collision between a plane and a ground vehicle resulted in the deaths of two pilots. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/24/laguardia-airplane-pilots-safety-concerns-crash&quot; title=&quot;Related: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Two pilots dead after plane and ground vehicle collide at LaGuardia&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47486386&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=47486386&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt; (667 comments)&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether systemic air traffic control (ATC) staffing shortages and extreme workloads—often involving 60-hour weeks—created the conditions for this accident &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504358&quot; title=&quot;I just hope they don&amp;#39;t try to pin this on the controller who was on duty and move on without putting plans in place for some sort of structural change. Controllers are forced to work 60+ hour weeks and overnight shifts, and the controller in question was working both ground and air control simultaneously due to staffing shortages. If you listen to the ATC audio, he was handling finding a spot for a plane that aborted takeoff and declared an emergency, while calling emergency services for that…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504175&quot; title=&quot;There was a single traffic controller handling the entire airport. This was bound to happen and will keep happening unless things change. It&amp;#39;s absurd that the US hasn&amp;#39;t been able to fix its ATC shortage in decades. Currently over 41% of facilities are reliant on mandatory overtime, with controllers frequently working 60-hour weeks with only four days off per month.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504214&quot; title=&quot;This. Go look at the atc subreddit, controllers have been begging for help for ages. This isn&amp;#39;t one guy&amp;#39;s fault.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that a single controller handling both ground and air duties is standard for late-night operations at LaGuardia &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504455&quot; title=&quot;How do you know it was due to staffing shortages?  It is common at LGA for one controller to be handling Tower and Ground late at night.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47505443&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; the controller in question was working both ground and air control simultaneously due to staffing shortages How many planes land at LGA in the middle the night? One controller overnight is completely reasonable.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the controller was overwhelmed by simultaneous emergencies and complex coordination tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504358&quot; title=&quot;I just hope they don&amp;#39;t try to pin this on the controller who was on duty and move on without putting plans in place for some sort of structural change. Controllers are forced to work 60+ hour weeks and overnight shifts, and the controller in question was working both ground and air control simultaneously due to staffing shortages. If you listen to the ATC audio, he was handling finding a spot for a plane that aborted takeoff and declared an emergency, while calling emergency services for that…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47505918&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/152572-aircraft-fir... Just a quick read/speculation based on the linked forum post... Short of insane visibility conditions that prevented them from seeing the plane coming, the firetruck operator seems to be the liable party (beyond the airport for understaffing controllers—this seems to be exacerbated by government cuts but that&amp;#39;s still no excuse for having a solo controller at that busy of an airport, especially at night). The controller in…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters also highlight the &amp;#34;terrifying&amp;#34; reputation of the airport among professional pilots &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47505424&quot; title=&quot;Hopefully some commercial professional pilots will comment on this thread, but if you go to sites where they normally hang out like: https://www.airlinepilotforums.com You will see many are terrified ( in commercial pilot terms...) of flying into La Guardia or JFK...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt; and suggest that the NTSB will likely focus on structural improvements rather than individual blame &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47506322&quot; title=&quot;The NTSB - and aviation in general - as much as possible tries to avoid &amp;#39;pinning&amp;#39; issues on individuals. The purpose of an investigation isn&amp;#39;t to ascribe blame, it&amp;#39;s to try to understand what happened and how to prevent it from happening again, and prescribing &amp;#39;don&amp;#39;t make mistakes&amp;#39; is not a realistic or useful method for preventing accidents from recurring.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://danielhomola.com/m%20&amp;amp;%20e/ai/your-bridge-to-wealth-is-being-pulled-up/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The bridge to wealth is being pulled up with AI&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (danielhomola.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47503296&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;259 points · &lt;strong&gt;379 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by dankai&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Artificial intelligence is dismantling the historical &amp;#34;bridge&amp;#34; that allowed high intelligence to be converted into heritable wealth through professional credentials. As AI automates cognitive tasks, the economic premium on IQ is collapsing, leaving capital ownership as the primary driver of long-term financial disparity across generations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://danielhomola.com/m%20&amp;%20e/ai/your-bridge-to-wealth-is-being-pulled-up/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Your bridge to wealth is being pulled up    URL Source: https://danielhomola.com/m%20&amp;amp;%20e/ai/your-bridge-to-wealth-is-being-pulled-up/    Published Time: 2026-03-21T00:00:00+01:00    Markdown Content:  # Your bridge to wealth is being pulled up - Daniel Homola    ## Skip links    *   [Skip to primary navigation](https://danielhomola.com/m%20&amp;amp;%20e/ai/your-bridge-to-wealth-is-being-pulled-up/#site-nav)  *   [Skip to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are deeply divided over whether AI will usher in a &amp;#34;borderline biblical&amp;#34; era of neo-feudalism where labor is obsolete and wealth is concentrated among a few capital owners &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504012&quot; title=&quot;The future (if we keep using money to allocate resources) is something akin to feudalism but worse. If you are born at the bottom you will never rise to the top. It&amp;#39;s bleak. Even worse, your labor will not be needed, nor will your intellectual abilities. There will be a few well off people with capital. The data centers will be guarded by automatons and drones. Everyone else will essentially live in a parallel economy that is borderline biblical. Countries like this already exist in the form of…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504365&quot; title=&quot;We’re already there. Your individual labor isn’t enough to make a living unless you subscribe to the altar of a feudal FAANG. This is preposterous. &amp;gt; Collectively, the wealthiest 1% held about $55 trillion in assets in the third quarter of 2025 — roughly equal to the wealth held by the bottom 90% of Americans combined. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-wealth-gap-widest-in-three-d...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504061&quot; title=&quot;This is when I ask sincerely: how does AI truly benefit the average Joe? Sure it can help you do things “faster” and it can give you “private/cheaper” advice. But, AI feels increasingly like a thing that will make the powerful a lot more powerful with their data centres and automation shenanigans. All the hype feels like it’s being injected into everyone’s brain like a virus. Oh look at this shiny new tool! But, how does it actually improve everyone’s life? We’ve gone from AGI to tokens as a…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that current wealth inequality and rising costs already signal this shift &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504365&quot; title=&quot;We’re already there. Your individual labor isn’t enough to make a living unless you subscribe to the altar of a feudal FAANG. This is preposterous. &amp;gt; Collectively, the wealthiest 1% held about $55 trillion in assets in the third quarter of 2025 — roughly equal to the wealth held by the bottom 90% of Americans combined. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-wealth-gap-widest-in-three-d...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47505070&quot; title=&quot;I had to drop off my health insurance when the bill hit $4,850.24/month. Millions did the same. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/19/aca-enrollees-uninsured.html&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that an impoverished populace could not sustain the industrial output required for high-tech data centers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504142&quot; title=&quot;If the vast majority live at a &amp;#39;borderline biblical&amp;#39; standard of living, then there is simply not enough excess wealth to pay for the data centers (or more accurately, the industrial output necessary to build and maintain those data centers) you&amp;#39;re talking about.  Agrarian societies (i.e. borderline biblical), by definition, do not have the excess labor necessary for industrial output at any scale (here I mean anything more than a few % of contemporary levels).&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504604&quot; title=&quot;Who is going to buy the stuff that the AI and robots produce, then? What will the point be of producing all this stuff?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Skeptics of this &amp;#34;bleak&amp;#34; outlook suggest that AI may instead become a commodity similar to open-source software, ultimately benefiting users and lowering the bar for competitive advantage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504161&quot; title=&quot;Until I see median real income start to actually go down, I just don&amp;#39;t buy it. AI is currently a commodity. Maybe one of the labs will be able to differentiate sufficiently to be able to charge the kinds of premiums they need just to pay back their investors. Maybe, instead, we&amp;#39;ll see something akin to the FOSS revolution, where large, high-quality, open training sets are developed to make sure there&amp;#39;s always a fair alternative to the big players. Then who actually benefits from AI? Mainly…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504202&quot; title=&quot;What are ai and robots other than excess labor, waiting to be allocated? Why does the wealth have to come from the meat bags?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.onhand.pro/p/i-wanted-to-build-vertical-saas-for-pest-control-i-took-a-technician-job-instead&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I wanted to build vertical SaaS for pest control, so I took a technician job&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (onhand.pro)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47509571&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;446 points · 183 comments · by tezclarke&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To better understand the industry for a software venture, an entrepreneur worked as a licensed pest control technician before deciding to acquire a residential operator and build a custom service platform. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.onhand.pro/p/i-wanted-to-build-vertical-saas-for-pest-control-i-took-a-technician-job-instead&quot; title=&quot;I wanted to build vertical SaaS for pest control. I took a technician job instead.    Not a shadowing day or research interview - a real job.    [![Logo](https://media.beehiiv.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,onerror=redirect/uploads/publication/logo/4886a5cf-f36f-4852-9256-79f9446a0aa8/terry_profile_background.jpeg)](/)    Search    [Home](/)    Login    Sign Up    * [Home](/)  * [Posts](/archive)  * I wanted to build vertical SaaS for pest control. I took a technician job instead.    # I wanted to build vertical…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a shift away from &amp;#34;venture or nothing&amp;#34; narratives toward building &amp;#34;sweaty&amp;#34; businesses where tech workers use AI and in-house software to gain a competitive edge &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47511583&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; That’s why selling SaaS or AI to this kind of company isn’t for me - I’d rather focus my energy on building a company from my own principles, and hire people who share them from the beginning. &amp;gt; When I told my manager I was leaving, he said I should start my own company and give him a call when I do. So that&amp;#39;s what I&amp;#39;m doing. I love hearing stories like this, because it shows a way to be a builder without the &amp;#39;venture or nothing&amp;#39; narrative that has pervaded the tech space since the dotcom…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47511722&quot; title=&quot;On &amp;#39;venture or nothing&amp;#39; - This will be my second company and this time round I have stripped right back to the problem, which is actually quite basic - pest control is a big, good business to be in and it&amp;#39;s possible to build a very big, profitable business by doing the simple things right, consistently. It will compound over time if the basics are done right (which is harder to do than I thought before this experiment) In my previous company, we founded it with the outcome first - &amp;#39;take over…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see this as a viable path for white-collar workers displaced by AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47510392&quot; title=&quot;This is going to be the route for a lot of white collar people as they lose their jobs to AI.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47511073&quot; title=&quot;This might be a bit of a gold rush of sorts at first, in that the first people to transition from tech to running a small business, whether tech-enabled or not, will find a bigger piece of the pie waiting for their taking.  But as the stream of many others increases over the years, the pie&amp;#39;s slices will get smaller as competition for the same market segments increases.  Not trying to paint doom and gloom, just that I&amp;#39;d imagine, as the author says, this kind of white to blue collar shift will…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others warn that tech workers often lack the physical stamina, tolerance for workplace unpleasantries, and humility required to succeed in blue-collar environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47510815&quot; title=&quot;I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but as a recent white-&amp;gt;blue collar convert, (union metalworker,) tech workers are usually far less qualified than your average vocational high school graduate, way less physically capable, and waaaaay less tolerant of the sort of workplace unpleasantries in these types of jobs at the entry level. Your tech experience gets you pretty much zero advantage,  and there are lots of very smart people outside of the software world that have put a whole lot more…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47511268&quot; title=&quot;yeah. there absolutely are lots of very smart and capable people outside of tech. as someone who has seen the blue collar world &amp;#39;up close&amp;#39; (family businesses), its a different breed... the culture and attitude gap is enormous. shockingly so. most tech workers I know couldn&amp;#39;t hang (don&amp;#39;t hustle as hard, risk averse, liberal), but some skills may transfer, like problem solving and diagnosis, i.e. debugging.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, the consensus suggests that while the &amp;#34;white-to-blue-collar&amp;#34; transition offers high upside for those who can master the basics, success requires overcoming a significant culture gap and avoiding the arrogance of assuming tech skills translate to immediate superiority &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47510815&quot; title=&quot;I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but as a recent white-&amp;gt;blue collar convert, (union metalworker,) tech workers are usually far less qualified than your average vocational high school graduate, way less physically capable, and waaaaay less tolerant of the sort of workplace unpleasantries in these types of jobs at the entry level. Your tech experience gets you pretty much zero advantage,  and there are lots of very smart people outside of the software world that have put a whole lot more…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47511722&quot; title=&quot;On &amp;#39;venture or nothing&amp;#39; - This will be my second company and this time round I have stripped right back to the problem, which is actually quite basic - pest control is a big, good business to be in and it&amp;#39;s possible to build a very big, profitable business by doing the simple things right, consistently. It will compound over time if the basics are done right (which is harder to do than I thought before this experiment) In my previous company, we founded it with the outcome first - &amp;#39;take over…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47511268&quot; title=&quot;yeah. there absolutely are lots of very smart and capable people outside of tech. as someone who has seen the blue collar world &amp;#39;up close&amp;#39; (family businesses), its a different breed... the culture and attitude gap is enormous. shockingly so. most tech workers I know couldn&amp;#39;t hang (don&amp;#39;t hustle as hard, risk averse, liberal), but some skills may transfer, like problem solving and diagnosis, i.e. debugging.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.githubstatus.com/incidents/kp06czybl7dw&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GitHub is once again down&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (githubstatus.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47508608&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;386 points · 201 comments · by MattIPv4&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GitHub has resolved a service disruption that caused elevated error rates and degraded performance for Actions, Issues, Pull Requests, Webhooks, Codespaces, and login functionality. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.githubstatus.com/incidents/kp06czybl7dw&quot; title=&quot;Title: Disruption with some GitHub services    URL Source: https://www.githubstatus.com/incidents/kp06czybl7dw    Markdown Content:  # GitHub Status - Disruption with some GitHub services    [](https://www.githubstatus.com/)[Help](https://help.github.com/)[Community](https://github.community/)[Status](https://www.githubstatus.com/)[GitHub.com](https://github.com/)    [Subscribe to Updates…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users attribute GitHub&amp;#39;s recent instability to a forced migration from private data centers to Azure, a transition reportedly driven by the &amp;#34;existential&amp;#34; need to scale for AI and Copilot demands &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47509308&quot; title=&quot;The worst part of all this is that GitHub&amp;#39;s CTO and VP of Engineering sent out the usual &amp;#39;here&amp;#39;s what we&amp;#39;ll do to fix things&amp;#39; letter to their larger customers and, without exaggeration, it boiled down to: 1) &amp;#39;Here&amp;#39;s a bunch of stuff we already did!&amp;#39; which... clearly isn&amp;#39;t working, and 2) &amp;#39;We&amp;#39;re continuing our Azure migration.&amp;#39; also clearly not working. So needless to say, if you depend on GitHub for critical business operations, you need to start thinking about what a world without GitHub looks…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47509520&quot; title=&quot;ooooh, they&amp;#39;re migrating to Azure, now everything makes sense.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47509825&quot; title=&quot;Here are some relevant excerpts from an October 2025 article[1]: &amp;gt; In a message to GitHub’s staff, CTO Vladimir Fedorov notes that GitHub is constrained on capacity in its Virginia data center. “It’s existential for us to keep up with the demands of AI and Copilot, which are changing how people use GitHub,” he writes. &amp;gt; The plan, he writes, is for GitHub to completely move out of its own data centers in 24 months. “This means we have 18 months to execute (with a 6 month buffer),” Fedorov’s memo…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the platform&amp;#39;s reliability has degraded to &amp;#34;one nine&amp;#34; of uptime since the Microsoft acquisition, others suggest the issues stem from a broader decline in software quality caused by a reliance on AI-synthesized code over deep system engineering &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47509231&quot; title=&quot;Took a full 8 years for a Microsoft acquisition to go to shit, which is probably a record. Kudos to the Github team for holding out this long.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47508997&quot; title=&quot;github is at one nine, basically: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47428035&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47509447&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s starting to really look like the AI effect. It might be coincidence but I&amp;#39;ve noticed a lot more downtime and bad software lately. The last Nvidia drivers gave me a blue screen (last week or so), and speaking about Windows, I froze updates last year because it was clear they were introducing a bunch of issues with every update (not to mention unwanted features). I like AI but actually not for coding because code quality is correlated to how well you understand the underlying systems you&amp;#39;re…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong consensus that leadership&amp;#39;s current remediation plans are insufficient, leading some to advise businesses to prepare for a future where GitHub is no longer a reliable dependency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47509308&quot; title=&quot;The worst part of all this is that GitHub&amp;#39;s CTO and VP of Engineering sent out the usual &amp;#39;here&amp;#39;s what we&amp;#39;ll do to fix things&amp;#39; letter to their larger customers and, without exaggeration, it boiled down to: 1) &amp;#39;Here&amp;#39;s a bunch of stuff we already did!&amp;#39; which... clearly isn&amp;#39;t working, and 2) &amp;#39;We&amp;#39;re continuing our Azure migration.&amp;#39; also clearly not working. So needless to say, if you depend on GitHub for critical business operations, you need to start thinking about what a world without GitHub looks…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47508747&quot; title=&quot;Every day more Microsofty...they should rename to &amp;#39;Your Repository Needs To Restart To Apply Updates&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/ssrajadh/sentrysearch&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Gemini can now natively embed video, so I built sub-second video search&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47503617&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;434 points · 108 comments · by sohamrj&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer has created a CLI tool that uses Gemini Embedding 2 to enable sub-second natural language searches of raw video footage without requiring transcriptions or frame captioning. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/ssrajadh/sentrysearch&quot; title=&quot;Gemini Embedding 2 can project raw video directly into a 768-dimensional vector space alongside text. No transcription, no frame captioning, no intermediate text. A query like &amp;amp;quot;green car cutting me off&amp;amp;quot; is directly comparable to a 30-second video clip at the vector level.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;I used this to build a CLI that indexes hours of footage into ChromaDB, then searches it with natural language and auto-trims the matching clip. Demo video on the GitHub README.  Indexing costs ~$2.50&amp;amp;#x2F;hr of…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the technical implementation of sub-second video search is praised as &amp;#34;magic,&amp;#34; the discussion centers heavily on the privacy risks of a potential AI-powered panopticon where natural language can be used to index public movements &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47506611&quot; title=&quot;This is a really cool implementation—embeddings still often feel like magic to me. That said, this exact use case is sort of also my biggest point of concern with where AI takes us, much more so than most of the common AI risks you hear lots of chatter about. We live in a world absolutely loaded with cameras now but ultimately retain some semblance of semi-anonymity/privacy in public by virtue of the fact that nobody can actually watch or review all of the video from those cameras except when…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47505718&quot; title=&quot;Where is the Exit to this dystopia?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47505964&quot; title=&quot;The Matrix style human pods: we live in blissful ignorance in the Matrix, while the LLMs extract more and more compute power from us so some CEO somewhere can claim they have now replaced all humans with machines in their business.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Users debate the current economic feasibility of continuous monitoring, noting that while costs are currently high—estimated between $2.50 and $14.22 per hour depending on frame rates—this barrier will likely diminish over time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47507132&quot; title=&quot;Totally valid concern. Right now the cost ($2.50/hr) and latency make continuous real-time indexing impractical, but that won&amp;#39;t always be the case. This is one of the reasons I&amp;#39;d want to see open-weight local models for this, keeps the indexing on your own hardware with no footage leaving your machine. But you&amp;#39;re right that the broader trajectory here is worth thinking carefully about.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47510419&quot; title=&quot;How are you getting to $2.50/hr ?   The price sheet says its 0.00079 per frame. https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing#gemini-embeddi...&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47511227&quot; title=&quot;From what I see the code downsamples video to 5 fps, so 1 hour of video is 3600 seconds * 5 fps = 18,000 frames. 18,000 frames * $0.00079/frame = $14.22. A couple dollars more with the overlap. (The code also tries to skip &amp;#39;still&amp;#39; frames, but if your video is dynamic you&amp;#39;re looking at the cost above.)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these dystopian concerns, some participants highlight practical, non-invasive use cases such as home monitoring or identifying specific activities like a neighbor not cleaning up after a pet &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47506611&quot; title=&quot;This is a really cool implementation—embeddings still often feel like magic to me. That said, this exact use case is sort of also my biggest point of concern with where AI takes us, much more so than most of the common AI risks you hear lots of chatter about. We live in a world absolutely loaded with cameras now but ultimately retain some semblance of semi-anonymity/privacy in public by virtue of the fact that nobody can actually watch or review all of the video from those cameras except when…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47505320&quot; title=&quot;very cool, anybody have apparent use cases for this?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47505089&quot; title=&quot;Very interesting (not for a dashcam, but for home monitoring).&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://burntsushi.net/ripgrep/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ripgrep is faster than grep, ag, git grep, ucg, pt, sift (2016)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (burntsushi.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47499245&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;375 points · 159 comments · by jxmorris12&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ripgrep is a high-performance, Rust-based command-line search tool that outperforms popular alternatives like grep and The Silver Searcher by combining advanced literal optimizations with efficient directory traversal. It features full Unicode support, respects `.gitignore` rules by default, and utilizes a specialized SIMD-accelerated regex engine for superior speed. &lt;a href=&quot;https://burntsushi.net/ripgrep/&quot; title=&quot;Title: ripgrep is faster than {grep, ag, git grep, ucg, pt, sift}    URL Source: https://burntsushi.net/ripgrep/    Published Time: Sat, 17 May 2025 15:02:24 GMT    Markdown Content:  # ripgrep is faster than {grep, ag, git grep, ucg, pt, sift} - Andrew Gallant&amp;#39;s Blog    [Andrew Gallant&amp;#39;s Blog](https://blog.burntsushi.net/)[About](https://burntsushi.net/about/)[Projects](https://burntsushi.net/projects/)[GitHub](https://github.com/BurntSushi)[Sponsor Me](https://github.com/sponsors/BurntSushi)    #…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While ripgrep is celebrated for its speed, users are divided over its default behavior of respecting `.gitignore` and `.ignore` files, with some arguing this violates the &amp;#34;Principle of Least Astonishment&amp;#34; and others recalling instances where it caused them to miss expected data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47502251&quot; title=&quot;I would argue that grep-like tools which read .gitignore violate the Principle of Least Astonishment (POLA). It would be fine if there were a --ignore flag to enable such functionality, but defaulting to it just feels wrong to me. Obviously smarter people than I disagree, but my dumdum head just feels that way.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47500465&quot; title=&quot;I was using ripgrep once and it had a bug that led me downa terrifying rabbit hole - I can&amp;#39;t recall what it was but it involved not being able to find text that absolutely should have been there. Eventually I was considering rebuilding the machine completely but for some reason after a very long time digging deep into the rabbit hole I tried plain old grep and there was the data exactly where it should have been. So it&amp;#39;s such a vague story but it was a while back - I don&amp;#39;t remember the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504984&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Obviously smarter people than I disagree, but my dumdum head just feels that way. No you are correct, do not doubt yourself. Baked in behavior catering to a completely separate tool is bad design. Git is the current version control software but its not the first nor last. Imagine if we move to another source control and are burdened with .gitignore files. No thanks. The Unix tools are designed to be good and explicit at their individual jobs so they can be easily composed together to form…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47500523&quot; title=&quot;Was the file in a .gitignore by any chance? I&amp;#39;ve got my home folder in git to keep track of dot/config files and that always catches me out. Really dislike it defaulting to that ignoring files that are ignored by git.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these concerns, there is nostalgia for the collaborative effort between tool authors to standardize the `.ignore` file format &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47501188&quot; title=&quot;One of my favorite moments in HN history was watching the authors of the various search tools decide on a common &amp;#39;.ignore&amp;#39; file as opposed to each having their own: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12568245&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Additional debate centers on naming conventions, specifically the confusion caused by the discrepancy between the project name &amp;#34;ripgrep&amp;#34; and its binary command `rg` &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47500424&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The binary name for `ripgrep` is `rg`. I don’t understand when people typeset some name in verbatim, lowercase, but then have another name for the actual command. That’s confusing to me. Programmers are too enarmored with lower-case names. Why not Ripgrep? Then I can surmise that there might not be some program ripgrep(1) (there might be a shorter version), since using capital letters is not traditional for CLI programs. Look at Stacked Git: https://stacked-git.github.io/ &amp;gt; Stacked Git, StGit…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47500437&quot; title=&quot;You can simply add a shell alias with whatever name you like and move on.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-03-23</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-03-23</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rz01.org/eu-migration/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Migrating to the EU&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (rz01.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47487436&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;911 points · 702 comments · by exitnode&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author describes their transition to European-based digital services, such as Uberspace, hosting.de, and Codeberg, to improve data protection and navigate the global political landscape. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rz01.org/eu-migration/&quot; title=&quot;Title: rz01.org    URL Source: https://rz01.org/eu-migration/    Markdown Content:  # rz01.org    ██████╗ ███████╗ ██████╗  ██╗    ██████╗ ██████╗  ██████╗   ██╔══██╗╚══███╔╝██╔═████╗███║   ██╔═══██╗██╔══██╗██╔════╝   ██████╔╝  ███╔╝ ██║██╔██║╚██║   ██║   ██║██████╔╝██║  ███╗  ██╔══██╗ ███╔╝  ████╔╝██║ ██║   ██║   ██║██╔══██╗██║   ██║  ██║  ██║███████╗╚██████╔╝ ██║██╗╚██████╔╝██║  ██║╚██████╔╝  ╚═╝  ╚═╝╚══════╝ ╚═════╝  ╚═╝╚═╝ ╚═════╝ ╚═╝  ╚═╝ ╚═════╝               * * *    [Main](https://rz01.org/) ‐…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a sharp divide over the EU&amp;#39;s legal protections, with some users warning that prosecutors can issue search warrants without judicial review and that &amp;#34;blind deference&amp;#34; between member states allows authoritarian-leaning nations to impact residents in more liberal ones &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47487866&quot; title=&quot;How comfortable are you guys with the fact that EU countries allow prosecutors and sometimes even police officers to issue their own search warrants without meaningful judicial review? Some EU courts will not exclude illegally obtained evidence either, so challenging the warrant later on will be pointless. Oh, and you might be in a reasonable EU country and still be hit with an EIO from one of the unreasonable countries. This is especially concerning given recent ECJ rulings increasingly…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47488527&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, but you also have Hungary who can decide to do things the same way they&amp;#39;re done in Sweden and Finland.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue this represents a lower baseline for free speech compared to the US, citing the existence of enforced blasphemy laws &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47488307&quot; title=&quot;The baseline level of freedom of speech in the EU, in particular, is much, much worse than in the US. We’re talking about a group of countries with active, enforced blasphemy laws! Completely unthinkable for Americans.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others dismiss these concerns as a false equivalence, contending that the EU maintains a stronger commitment to the rule of law and democracy while the US faces its own descent into authoritarianism &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47488467&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;How comfortable are you guys with the fact that EU countries allow prosecutors and sometimes even police officers to issue their own search warrants without meaningful judicial review? This is a hilarious &amp;#39;just asking questions&amp;#39; concern that doesn&amp;#39;t address the complete 180 in direction the US is taking and descending in to authoritarianism while moving against the world order it primarily helped build post WWII while threatening other liberal democracies like Canada and Denmark with…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47487947&quot; title=&quot;At least there is still the rule of law and democracy in the EU&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47488297&quot; title=&quot;Sweden is a country like this. It is just the way it is here. It can be abused, sure. But all things considered, I much rather have my things hosted here than in the US.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Amidst these legal debates, users shared practical experiences migrating to European services like Proton, Infomaniak, and Mailbox.org to avoid US-centric data harvesting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47488924&quot; title=&quot;As a Canadian, I’ve been thinking since last year about migrating to non-US services and applications. My main goal is simply to avoid giving money or data directly to US corporations. I have no illusions, these non-US services probably still benefit US companies in some ways. They’re rare, but I’ve consciously decided to stay away from some Canadian alternatives. The main customers of most Canadian tech companies are in the US, and I feel they would happily move there if needed. I started with…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47488197&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; First, I tried mailbox.org, which I can generally recommend without reservation. Unfortunately, you can’t send emails from any address on your own domain without a workaround I use mailbox for a long time, one account for 2.50EUR/month with multiple custom domains and I can send emails from any address. To send from a different address the process didn&amp;#39;t really seem different than other providers. From Thunderbird mobile on Android I just add a new sender identity. If I need to send from…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47487771&quot; title=&quot;Codeberg is only for FOSS projects. Is there some good European hosting provider for git? I really don&amp;#39;t want to self host git.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy01g522ww4o&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Two pilots dead after plane and ground vehicle collide at LaGuardia&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47486386&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;429 points · &lt;strong&gt;687 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by mememememememo&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two pilots were killed at LaGuardia Airport after their small plane collided with a ground vehicle on the runway during a landing attempt. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy01g522ww4o&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;avherald.com&amp;amp;#x2F;h?article=536bb98e&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;avherald.com&amp;amp;#x2F;h?article=536bb98e&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The collision at LaGuardia has sparked intense criticism regarding the lack of modernization in Air Traffic Control (ATC), with some arguing that the continued reliance on radio communication and human memory is a systemic failure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47489903&quot; title=&quot;In 2026, with how much money their is in aviation, it seems wild to not have digitized this ages ago. The runway should be essentially &amp;#39;locked&amp;#39; when in use, if they don&amp;#39;t want screens in every ground vehicle that may cross a runway, at least display it at runway entrances. That ATC still takes place over radio just seems insane at this point. And there&amp;#39;s pretty much no way to make ATC&amp;#39;s job not stressful, its inherently stressful. Taking out how much of their job is held in the current…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47492384&quot; title=&quot;Air traffic (and ground traffic) control are not simple problems. La Guardia has 350k aircraft operations (takeoffs and landings) every year. 1000/day. Peak traffic is almost certainly more than 1 plane every minute. Runways are always in use and the idea that some simple software will solve all the safety problems is not grounded in reality.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. However, a strong consensus exists that the primary issue is severe understaffing and fatigue, as evidenced by controllers working six-day weeks and, in this specific instance, a single individual managing both ground and tower frequencies simultaneously &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47493196&quot; title=&quot;While modernizing ATC in the US may be overdue, the real issue here is that ATC in the US has been understaffed, underpaid, and overworked for a while now. My father works ATC and his schedule has him working overtime, 6 shifts a week, including overnight shifts, meaning that there is literally not a day of the week where he doesn&amp;#39;t spend at least some time in the tower. If that&amp;#39;s the reality for even half of the controllers, it&amp;#39;s no surprise that we&amp;#39;ve been seeing more and more traffic…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47488306&quot; title=&quot;They were indeed the only controller, working both ground and tower frequencies.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47488631&quot; title=&quot;And these guys are tremendously overworked because the government can’t get its shit together to hire enough people to staff at appropriate levels.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Commentators noted the immense psychological burden on the controller, who had to continue managing traffic immediately after realizing a fatal mistake had occurred &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47487978&quot; title=&quot;ATC recording on https://www.liveatc.net/recordings.php Fire truck was cleared to cross and then told to stop. I&amp;#39;m not sure if they were the only controller working at the time, they continued working after the incident which seems unusual; my understanding is normally they&amp;#39;d be relieved by another controller.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47488496&quot; title=&quot;https://x.com/thenewarea51/status/2035926457394876837 ATC audio make a mistake, recognize it, and then have to continue on your job, knowing you likely just killed people, because if you don&amp;#39;t others will die. The weight of some jobs is immense, and our civilization relies upon workers to shoulder the burden everyday.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/anemll/status/2035901335984611412&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;iPhone 17 Pro Demonstrated Running a 400B LLM&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47490070&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;712 points · 327 comments · by anemll&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A demonstration reportedly shows an iPhone 17 Pro successfully running a 400-billion parameter large language model (LLM). &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/anemll/status/2035901335984611412&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;anemll&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2035901335984611412&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;anemll&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2035901335984611412&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The demonstration of a 400B parameter LLM on an iPhone 17 Pro highlights a shift where hardware capabilities are outpacing software assumptions, though current performance is limited to a slow 0.6 t/s &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47490865&quot; title=&quot;Run an incredible 400B parameters on a handheld device. 0.6 t/s, wait 30 seconds to see what these billions of calculations get us: &amp;#39;That is a profound observation, and you are absolutely right ...&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47490422&quot; title=&quot;A year ago this would have been considered impossible. The hardware is moving faster than anyone&amp;#39;s software assumptions.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. This feat likely utilizes &amp;#34;SSD streaming&amp;#34; techniques to bypass the device&amp;#39;s limited RAM, a strategy previously explored in Apple&amp;#39;s research &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47490489&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; SSD streaming to GPU Is this solution based on what Apple describes in their 2023 paper &amp;#39;LLM in a flash&amp;#39; [1]? 1: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.11514&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47490915&quot; title=&quot;A similar approach was recently featured here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47476422 Though iPhone Pro has very limited RAM (12GB total) which you still need for the active part of the model.  (Unless you want to use Intel Optane wearout-resistant storage, but that was power hungry and thus unsuitable to a mobile device.)&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see Apple&amp;#39;s massive distribution and high-speed bus architecture as a path to winning the AI race, others argue the company must abandon its history of skimping on RAM to make edge AI truly performant &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47491718&quot; title=&quot;I have some macro opinions about Apple - not sure if I&amp;#39;m correct, but tell me what you think. Apple has always seen RAM as an economic advantage for their platform: Make the development effort to ensure that the OS and apps work well with minimal memory and save billions every year in hardware costs. In 2026, iPhones still come with 8Gb of RAM, Pro/Max come with 12Gb. The problem is that AI (ML/LLM training and inference) are areas where you can&amp;#39;t get around the need for copious amounts of fast…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47490732&quot; title=&quot;Apple might just win the AI race without even running in it. It&amp;#39;s all about the distribution.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Concerns remain regarding thermal throttling during local inference and the physical limitations of fitting specialized AI hardware into mobile form factors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47491400&quot; title=&quot;Only way to have hardware reach this sort of efficiency is to embed the model in hardware. This exists[0], but the chip in question is physically large and won&amp;#39;t fit on a phone. [0] https://www.anuragk.com/blog/posts/Taalas.html&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47492962&quot; title=&quot;My iPad Air with M2 can run local LLMs rather well. But it gets ridiculously hot within seconds and starts throttling.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-updates-covered-list-include-foreign-made-consumer-routers&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;FCC updates covered list to include foreign-made consumer routers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (fcc.gov)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47495344&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;495 points · 428 comments · by moonka&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FCC has updated its &amp;#34;covered list&amp;#34; to include consumer routers produced by certain foreign companies, effectively banning them from the U.S. market due to identified national security risks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-updates-covered-list-include-foreign-made-consumer-routers&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;docs.fcc.gov&amp;amp;#x2F;public&amp;amp;#x2F;attachments&amp;amp;#x2F;DOC-420034A1.pdf&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;docs.fcc.gov&amp;amp;#x2F;public&amp;amp;#x2F;attachments&amp;amp;#x2F;DOC-420034A1.pdf&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.fcc.gov&amp;amp;#x2F;document&amp;amp;#x2F;fcc-adds-routers-produced-foreign-countries-covered-list&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.fcc.gov&amp;amp;#x2F;document&amp;amp;#x2F;fcc-adds-routers-produced-forei...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FCC&amp;#39;s move to restrict foreign-made routers is seen by some as a protectionist measure that uses national security as leverage to force domestic manufacturing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47496185&quot; title=&quot;The FCC maintains a list of equipment and services (Covered List)       that have been determined to “pose an unacceptable risk to the      national security        Recently, malicious state and non-state sponsored cyber attackers      have increasingly leveraged the vulnerabilities in small and home      office routers produced abroad to carry out direct attacks against      American civilians in their homes. Vulnerabilities have nothing to do with country of manufacture.  They have always been due…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47496404&quot; title=&quot;This part of the press release seems pretty crucial: &amp;gt; Producers of consumer-grade routers that receive Conditional Approval from DoW or DHS can continue to receive FCC equipment authorizations. In other words, foreign-made consumer routers are banned by default. But if you are a manufacturer, you can apply to get unbanned (&amp;#39;Conditional Approval&amp;#39;). In the FAQ ( https://www.fcc.gov/faqs-recent-updates-fcc-covered-list-reg... ), they even include guidance on how to apply:…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that security vulnerabilities stem from poor industry-wide practices rather than geography &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47496185&quot; title=&quot;The FCC maintains a list of equipment and services (Covered List)       that have been determined to “pose an unacceptable risk to the      national security        Recently, malicious state and non-state sponsored cyber attackers      have increasingly leveraged the vulnerabilities in small and home      office routers produced abroad to carry out direct attacks against      American civilians in their homes. Vulnerabilities have nothing to do with country of manufacture.  They have always been due…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that &amp;#34;crap security&amp;#34; provides plausible deniability for state-sponsored backdoors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47496598&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Vulnerabilities have nothing to do with country of manufacture. They have always been due to manufacturers&amp;#39; crap security practices. Sorry but this is merely a convenient excuse. Source: I have hard evidence of a Chinese IoT device where crap security practices were later leveraged by the same company to inject exploit code. It&amp;#39;s called plausible deniability and it&amp;#39;s foolish to tell me it&amp;#39;s a coincidence. You&amp;#39;re not going to convince me that a foreign state actor pressuring a company to…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong consensus that the best solution is mandating open-source firmware or third-party audits, which would allow for extended device lifespans and independent verification of security claims &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47496226&quot; title=&quot;If we wanted secure products, we wouldn&amp;#39;t ban devices. We&amp;#39;d mandate they open their firmware to audits.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47497065&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Manufacturers have never had to care about security because no Gov agency would ever mandate secure firmware. The problem is that &amp;#39;secure firmware&amp;#39; is a relativistic statement. You ship something with no known bugs and then someone finds one. What you need is not a government mandate for infallibility, it&amp;#39;s updates. But then vendors want to stop issuing them after 3 years, meanwhile many consumers will keep using the device for 15. And &amp;#39;require longer support&amp;#39; doesn&amp;#39;t fix it because many of…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47496449&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;d be great if open firmware could be commercially viable. Finding a business model is hard. The OpenWRT One [1] sponsored by the Software Conservancy [2] and manufactured by Banana Pi [3] works lovely. [1] https://openwrt.org/toh/openwrt/one [2] https://sfconservancy.org/activities/openwrt-one.html [3] https://docs.banana-pi.org/en/OpenWRT-One/BananaPi_OpenWRT-O...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47496297&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; how do you prove the firmware in the flash chip matches source? Trusted, qualified independent experts: Ala Underwriters Laboratories.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cc.storyfox.cz&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Claude Code Cheat Sheet&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cc.storyfox.cz)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47495527&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;697 points · 189 comments · by phasE89&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Claude Code Cheat Sheet provides a comprehensive guide to version 2.1.81, detailing keyboard shortcuts, slash commands, MCP server management, and memory configurations. It highlights new features like the `--bare` flag, effort level settings, and remote control capabilities for the terminal-based AI coding assistant. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cc.storyfox.cz&quot; title=&quot;Title: Claude Code Cheat Sheet    URL Source: https://cc.storyfox.cz/    Published Time: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 11:10:57 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Claude Code Cheat Sheet    # Claude Code Cheat Sheet    Claude Code v2.1.81 Last updated: March 23, 2026    [📋 Recent Changes](https://code.claude.com/docs/en/changelog)✕    *   `--bare` flag — minimal headless mode (no hooks/LSP/plugins)  *   `--channels` — permission relay &amp;amp; MCP push messages (preview)  *   `effort` frontmatter for skills &amp;amp; slash commands  *   `/fork`…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are divided on whether the need for a cheat sheet indicates a UX failure or is simply a helpful tool for a rapidly evolving CLI that many find superior to competitors like Codex &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47496636&quot; title=&quot;Shocking how far ahead Claude Code is from Codex on the CLI front.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47496071&quot; title=&quot;The fact this needs to exist seems like a UX red flag.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47497447&quot; title=&quot;Yet all the people OpenAI bought out recently say Codex is “the future”&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. One developer shared a notable anecdote about using Claude Code to build a self-improving agentic system that successfully automates complex API generation through iterative git branching &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47497267&quot; title=&quot;With Claude Code I created an agent that spawns 5 copies of itself branching git worktrees from main branch using subagents so no context leaks into their instructions. The agent will every 60 seconds analyze the performance of each of the copies which run for about 40 minutes answering the question &amp;#39;what would you do different?&amp;#39;. After they finish the task, the parent will update the .claude/ files enhancing itself reverting if the copies performed worse or enhancing if they performed better.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some question the practicality of printing a document that updates daily, others are focused on the potential for these tools to develop sophisticated trading strategies using massive financial datasets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47497267&quot; title=&quot;With Claude Code I created an agent that spawns 5 copies of itself branching git worktrees from main branch using subagents so no context leaks into their instructions. The agent will every 60 seconds analyze the performance of each of the copies which run for about 40 minutes answering the question &amp;#39;what would you do different?&amp;#39;. After they finish the task, the parent will update the .claude/ files enhancing itself reverting if the copies performed worse or enhancing if they performed better.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47495947&quot; title=&quot;Is something updated daily a good target to be printable?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47497745&quot; title=&quot;Let us perform a thought experiment. You do this. Many others, enthusiastic about both LLMs, and stocks/options, have similar ideas. Do these trading strategies interfere with each other? Does this group of people leveraging Claude for trading end up doing better in the market than those not? What are your benchmarks for success, say,  a year into it? Do you have a specific edge in mind which you can leverage, that others cannot?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47497619&quot; title=&quot;https://massive.com/docs/flat-files/quickstart I use TimescaleDB which is fast with the compression. People say there are better but I don’t think I can fit another year of data on my disk drive either or&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016517652200283X&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Student beauty and grades under in-person and remote teaching&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sciencedirect.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47488015&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;360 points · &lt;strong&gt;514 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by jdthedisciple&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am unable to summarize this story because the provided link returned a &amp;#34;Forbidden&amp;#34; error and the content consists only of a security verification page. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016517652200283X&quot; title=&quot;Title: Just a moment...    URL Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016517652200283X    Warning: Target URL returned error 403: Forbidden    Markdown Content:  # Just a moment...    [![Image 1: Elsevier logo](blob:http://localhost/84fae110a9934890163c7653d951a57a)](https://www.sciencedirect.com/)    *   Help       # Are you a robot?    Please confirm you are a human by completing the captcha challenge below.    Verification successful. Waiting for www.sciencedirect.com to respond    *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a significant &amp;#34;beauty premium&amp;#34; in education and professional life, where attractive individuals often receive better treatment, more support, and higher social engagement &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47488844&quot; title=&quot;People that have used to be fat, and then lost a lot of weight, will know how brutally different people will treat you. Whereas you&amp;#39;d practically be a ghost before weight loss, random people will suddenly look you in your eyes, smile, even start conversations with you. Some will of course argue that you losing weight will also make you more confident, and thus you become more approachable. I think there&amp;#39;s a lot of bias against fat people, against &amp;#39;unattractive&amp;#39; people, etc. This also shows in…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47488339&quot; title=&quot;The article says: Why is beauty a productivity-enhancing attribute for males in non-quantitative subjects? Generally, it is difficult to disentangle the reasons behind why beauty improves productivity (Hamermesh and Parker, 2005). However, relative to other students, attractive men are more successful in peer influence, and are more persistent, a personality trait positively linked to academic outcomes (Dion and Stein, 1978, Alan et al., 2019). In addition, attractive individuals are more…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that standardized testing like the Gaokao or SAT offers a meritocratic alternative to appearance-based bias &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47488408&quot; title=&quot;One thing I like about China&amp;#39;s education system is the Gaokao entrance exams for universities. It doesn&amp;#39;t matter if you&amp;#39;re rich, poor, ugly, or beautiful. All it matters is how you score. It&amp;#39;s as meritocratic as education can be.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47488441&quot; title=&quot;And a side note from me as a Pole - online I see many Americans speaking about how cruel Gaokao is, but... It&amp;#39;s America that&amp;#39;s outlier. I had the same style of exam in Poland to get to uni, and it&amp;#39;s the same in the entire EU, and rest of the world. So I have no idea why Gaokao is singled out.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that wealthy families bypass this by purchasing elite tutoring &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47488443&quot; title=&quot;Don’t wealthier families hire tutors to prepare their children? That’s what happens in the US with the SAT/ACT. I think you’d need free, universal SAT tutoring available to everyone in order to be more meritocratic.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47488468&quot; title=&quot;We have the SAT and ACT, and those are objective. The wealthy still pass disproportionately due to better tutoring specifically oriented to those tests. It’s Goodhart’s law.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a notable disagreement regarding whether improved social treatment after weight loss stems from physical appearance alone or from the increased confidence, better grooming, and disciplined lifestyle changes that often accompany it &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47488844&quot; title=&quot;People that have used to be fat, and then lost a lot of weight, will know how brutally different people will treat you. Whereas you&amp;#39;d practically be a ghost before weight loss, random people will suddenly look you in your eyes, smile, even start conversations with you. Some will of course argue that you losing weight will also make you more confident, and thus you become more approachable. I think there&amp;#39;s a lot of bias against fat people, against &amp;#39;unattractive&amp;#39; people, etc. This also shows in…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47489225&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Whereas you&amp;#39;d practically be a ghost before weight loss, random people will suddenly look you in your eyes, smile, even start conversations with you. I watched something like this happen in a friend, but as an outside observer I saw a different explanation: The period when he got into shape involved a lot of changes for the better in his life, including becoming more outgoing, motivated, and disciplined (necessary prerequisites for weight loss in the pre-medication era). He also bought a new…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47489802&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; He also bought a new wardrobe and replaced his old worn out logo T-shirts and cargo shorts with clothes more appropriate for an adult. I think the problem many __men__ have with that is that an &amp;#39;appropriate&amp;#39; wardrobe looks more uniform and less individualized, basically boring.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. To mitigate these biases, some suggest that professional environments should return to audio-only interactions to ensure evaluations remain focused on qualifications rather than physical traits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47488807&quot; title=&quot;My first job during and out of college back in 2003, we were entirely remote. We hired exclusively over the phone which resulted in a mix of people that were completely diverse in their backgrounds and at the same time truly qualified to do the work. The company went on to grow quite successfully until it was acquired 6 years later. I feel that zoom and video conferencing allows some of that &amp;#39;appearance&amp;#39; factor back in. Based on my experience though, if I had my way, job interviews would be…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2026/03/23/us-and-totalenergies-reach-nearly-1-billion-deal-to-end-offshore-wind-projects_6751739_4.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;US and TotalEnergies reach &amp;#39;nearly $1B&amp;#39; deal to end offshore wind projects&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lemonde.fr)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47492599&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;448 points · 386 comments · by lode&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The United States and TotalEnergies signed a nearly $1 billion deal to terminate the company&amp;#39;s offshore wind projects and redirect the funds toward U.S. fossil fuel production, specifically natural gas, following a shift in federal energy policy under the Trump administration. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2026/03/23/us-and-totalenergies-reach-nearly-1-billion-deal-to-end-offshore-wind-projects_6751739_4.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: US and TotalEnergies reach &amp;#39;nearly $1 billion&amp;#39; deal to end offshore wind projects    URL Source: https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2026/03/23/us-and-totalenergies-reach-nearly-1-billion-deal-to-end-offshore-wind-projects_6751739_4.html    Published Time: 2026-03-23T17:23:43+01:00    Markdown Content:  # US and TotalEnergies reach &amp;#39;nearly $1 billion&amp;#39; deal to end offshore wind projects    Date: Loading date...    Time: Loading time...     Menu Menu    [Go Back to the HomePage Le…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The U.S. government is reimbursing TotalEnergies approximately $1 billion for relinquishing offshore wind leases, a move critics describe as a taxpayer-funded pivot to boost fossil fuel production &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47494353&quot; title=&quot;NY Times phrases it as a reimbursement to TotalEnergies for relinquishing wind leases that they paid for.  The US made the reimbursement contingent on them investing in fossil fuel projects. &amp;#39;The deal is an extraordinary transfer of taxpayer dollars to a foreign company for the purposes of boosting the production of fossil fuels.&amp;#39; Total waste of $1 Bil of taxpayer dollars. If the oil and gas industry want to shut down wind projects let them pay for it.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47494692&quot; title=&quot;They are taking money committed to a wind project and redirecting it towards burning fossil fuels - because what other lesson can we take from a global energy shock other than to increase our exposure to the next one? The company itself (France&amp;#39;s Total) had already committed to the wind deal, so now the Trump admin is letting them off the hook, and using Trump&amp;#39;s irrational refusal to issue licenses for wind power as the excuse for why the deal wasn&amp;#39;t working out as originally planned.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users question if the &amp;#34;payment&amp;#34; is simply a returned lease deposit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47494153&quot; title=&quot;HN title (currently reads &amp;#39;US govt pays TotalEnergies nearly $1B to stop US offshore wind projects&amp;#39;) is editorialized and it&amp;#39;s unclear to me whether it&amp;#39;s accurate. The article says: &amp;gt; We&amp;#39;re partnering with TotalEnergies to unleash nearly $1 billion that was tied up in a lease deposit that was directed towards the prior administration&amp;#39;s subsidies What&amp;#39;s the deal with this lease deposit and how does &amp;#39;freeing it up&amp;#39; equate to the US govt &amp;#39;paying&amp;#39; TotalEnergies that amount? Is this a situation…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others view it as a &amp;#34;total waste&amp;#34; of funds driven by an anti-renewable agenda &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47494353&quot; title=&quot;NY Times phrases it as a reimbursement to TotalEnergies for relinquishing wind leases that they paid for.  The US made the reimbursement contingent on them investing in fossil fuel projects. &amp;#39;The deal is an extraordinary transfer of taxpayer dollars to a foreign company for the purposes of boosting the production of fossil fuels.&amp;#39; Total waste of $1 Bil of taxpayer dollars. If the oil and gas industry want to shut down wind projects let them pay for it.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47493703&quot; title=&quot;I know this US government is fully-committed to fossil fuels and about as rabidly anti-renewables as can be, but I&amp;#39;m still shocked to see things like this. And I&amp;#39;m fully aware of Trump&amp;#39;s Scotland experience and how that contributed or directly led to this, but, still, shocked. And then I&amp;#39;m also shocked because I know that at least half, if not a good bit more, of US citizens are in agreement with this strategy. Not sure how I can still be shocked but here I am. And I say that not as some rabid…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47493900&quot; title=&quot;The guy is unhinged, hellbent on denial, just to appease his base, who are going bankrupt because of his policies. Would he pay Sun as well to stop shining over the US?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion highlights a deep divide over energy security, with some arguing fossil fuels provide stability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47493484&quot; title=&quot;Fortunately, fossil fuels are a stable and geopolitically risk-free source of energy.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47493522&quot; title=&quot;The US (with Canada and Mexico) is self-sufficient with fossil fuel energy.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt; while others fear the long-term geopolitical and environmental risks of abandoning green energy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47494102&quot; title=&quot;Serious question, but not entirely related to the topic - how are “smart” people in the US preparing for the next 20-30 years? - Assume everything will be fine and America will remain a global economic superpower. - Plan an exit to a more serious, stable country. - Some option in the middle of the two to hedge your bets?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47494692&quot; title=&quot;They are taking money committed to a wind project and redirecting it towards burning fossil fuels - because what other lesson can we take from a global energy shock other than to increase our exposure to the next one? The company itself (France&amp;#39;s Total) had already committed to the wind deal, so now the Trump admin is letting them off the hook, and using Trump&amp;#39;s irrational refusal to issue licenses for wind power as the excuse for why the deal wasn&amp;#39;t working out as originally planned.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/10/github_outages/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GitHub appears to be struggling with measly three nines availability&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theregister.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47487584&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;473 points · 239 comments · by richtr&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GitHub is struggling to maintain its 99.9% uptime standard following a series of service disruptions affecting Actions, pull requests, and Copilot, with unofficial data suggesting stability has occasionally dropped below 90%. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/10/github_outages/&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub appears to be struggling with measly three nines availability    URL Source: https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/10/github_outages/    Published Time: 2026-02-10T12:39:44Z    Markdown Content:  # GitHub seems to be struggling with three nines availability • The Register    [![Image 1](https://www.theregister.com/design_picker/ae01b183a707a7db8cd5f2c947715ed56d335138/graphics/std/user_icon_white_extents_16x16.png)![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GitHub&amp;#39;s reliability has faced sharp criticism, with data showing that even core services like Git and Actions are struggling to maintain &amp;#34;two nines&amp;#34; of availability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47488877&quot; title=&quot;Have anyone checked out the status page? It&amp;#39;s actually way worse than I thought, I believe this is the first time I am actually witnessing a status page with truly horrible results. https://mrshu.github.io/github-statuses&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47490247&quot; title=&quot;You&amp;#39;re right that labelling any outage as &amp;#39;Github is down&amp;#39; is an overgeneralisation, &amp;amp; we should focus on bottlenecks that impact teams in a time sensitive matter, but that isn&amp;#39;t the case here. Their most stable service (API) has only two 9s (99.69%). They&amp;#39;re not even struggling to get their average to three 9s, they&amp;#39;re struggling to get ANY service to three 9s. They&amp;#39;re struggling to get many services to two 9s. Copilot may be the least stable at one 9, but the services I would consider most…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that uptime metrics are skewed by non-essential features like Copilot &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47490020&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t want to give too much credit to Github, because their uptime is truly horrendous and they need to fix it. But: I&amp;#39;ve felt like its a little unfair to judge the uptime of company platforms like this; by saying &amp;#39;if any feature at all is down, its all down&amp;#39; and then translating that into 9s for the platform. I never use Github Copilot; it does go down a lot, if their status page is to be believed; I don&amp;#39;t really care when it goes down, because it going down doesn&amp;#39;t bring down the rest of…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others point to a decline in stability following the platform&amp;#39;s migration to Azure infrastructure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47487819&quot; title=&quot;From GitHub CTO in 2025 when they announced they&amp;#39;re moving everything to Azure instead of letting GitHub&amp;#39;s infrastructure remain independent: &amp;gt; For us, availability is job #1, and this migration ensures GitHub remains the fast, reliable platform developers depend on That went about as well as everyone thought back then. Does anyone else remember back in ~2014-2015 sometime, when half the community was screaming at GitHub to &amp;#39;please be faster at adding more features&amp;#39;? I wish we could get back to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond availability, there is significant alarm regarding security vulnerabilities in GitHub Actions, specifically the abuse of mutable references which recently contributed to a breach at Aqua Security &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47488305&quot; title=&quot;While GitHub obsess over shoving AI into everything, the rest of the platform is genuinely crumbling and its security flaws are being abused to cause massive damage.   Last week Aqua Security was breached and a few repositories it owns were infected. The threat actors abused widespread use of mutable references in GitHub Actions, which the community has been screaming about for years, to infect potentially thousands of CI runs. They also abused an issue GitHub has acknowledged but refused to fix…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47489648&quot; title=&quot;Public service announcement You can pin actions versions to their hash. Some might say this is a best practice for now. It looks like this, where the comment says where the hash is supposed to point. Old --&amp;gt;   uses: actions/checkout@v4        New --&amp;gt;   uses: actions/checkout@11bd71901bbe5b1630ceea73d27597364c9af683 # v4 There is a tool to sweep through your repo and automate this: https://github.com/mheap/pin-github-action&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47489699&quot; title=&quot;The problem is actions/checkout@11bd71901bbe5b1630ceea73d27597364c9af683 probably doesn’t do this same pinning, and the actions ecosystem is such an intertwined mess that any single compromised action can propagate to the rest&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.itsthatlady.dev/blog/building-an-ai-receptionist-for-my-brother/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I built an AI receptionist for a mechanic shop&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (itsthatlady.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47487536&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;319 points · 320 comments · by mooreds&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer built &amp;#34;Axle,&amp;#34; a custom AI voice receptionist for a luxury mechanic shop, using a RAG pipeline, MongoDB, and Vapi to handle customer inquiries, provide accurate pricing, and collect callbacks to prevent lost business from missed calls. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.itsthatlady.dev/blog/building-an-ai-receptionist-for-my-brother/&quot; title=&quot;Title: How I Built an AI Receptionist for a Luxury Mechanic Shop - Part 1    URL Source: https://www.itsthatlady.dev/blog/building-an-ai-receptionist-for-my-brother/    Markdown Content:  # How I Built an AI Receptionist for a Luxury Mechanic Shop - Part 1  [That LadyDev](https://www.itsthatlady.dev/)  *   [Home](https://www.itsthatlady.dev/)  *   [About](https://www.itsthatlady.dev/about-us)  *   [Blog](https://www.itsthatlady.dev/blog)  *   [Newsletter](https://www.itsthatlady.dev/newsletter)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Critics argue that an AI receptionist for a mechanic shop is a &amp;#34;dangerous&amp;#34; over-complication that risks a business&amp;#39;s reputation by providing inaccurate quotes for dynamic costs like labor and parts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47495187&quot; title=&quot;I used to work as a service advisor - or as the article says, receptionist. This system will not work as described for several reasons. 1. Unless you have a recent job that matches the exact same repair/service, you have incorrectly estimated the cost of the repair. In some states, this matters a lot and will cost the shop money. Unless your LLM only quotes for labor in sane amounts for diagnostic and nothing else, you’re only adding noise. This is a disservice to the client and the shop owner.…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47492948&quot; title=&quot;It also ignores easily available solutions that could have been deployed prior to AI For example, even if it shows a boost of $100,000 per month in revenue. It could likely have been achieved with a shared virtual assistant / receptionist for about $200-1000 per month (depending on exactly call volumes). So really, the revenue was already lost and going forward you’re just deciding to capture it. You&amp;#39;ve created a more complicated mouse trap than what was already available to you. The difference…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users appreciate the efficiency of LLM-based phone assistants compared to long hold times &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47491752&quot; title=&quot;Maybe I am in the minority here, but I appreciate the new crop of LLM based phone assistants. I recently switched to mint mobile and needed to do something that wasn&amp;#39;t possible in their app. The LLM answered the call immediately, was able to understand me in natural conversation, and solved my problem. I was off the call in less than a minute. In the past I would have been on hold for 15-20 minutes and possibly had a support agent who didn&amp;#39;t know how to solve my problem.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, many commenters suggest that a human virtual assistant would be a more reliable, &amp;#34;future-proof&amp;#34; solution for capturing lost revenue &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47487719&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;and he’s losing thousands of dollars per month because he misses hundreds of calls per week. He’s under the hood all day. The phone rings, he can’t answer, the customer hangs up and calls someone else. That’s a lost job — sometimes a $450 brake service, sometimes a $2,000 engine repair — just gone because no one picked up. How much does it cost to have an outsourced receptionist? Even if it is 500 a month if we are really talking about thousands of dollars per month lost your ROI is still…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47492948&quot; title=&quot;It also ignores easily available solutions that could have been deployed prior to AI For example, even if it shows a boost of $100,000 per month in revenue. It could likely have been achieved with a shared virtual assistant / receptionist for about $200-1000 per month (depending on exactly call volumes). So really, the revenue was already lost and going forward you’re just deciding to capture it. You&amp;#39;ve created a more complicated mouse trap than what was already available to you. The difference…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47495907&quot; title=&quot;I am certainly not an expert but I agree a lot with your sentiment about the hubris - but the problem as presented in the article makes no sense to me. If you see a value need for a receptionist, and you suspect that it is costing you thousands of dollars, wouldn&amp;#39;t a normal response be, &amp;#39;I should think about hiring someone,&amp;#39; rather than turning to an unproven, untested solution like this and leaving your business at the hands of how correct it is? I just cannot understand this line of thinking…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, skeptics question the necessity of the tool, noting that if a solo mechanic is already &amp;#34;under the hood all day,&amp;#34; they may not actually want or have the capacity for more business &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47493289&quot; title=&quot;Given the article states &amp;gt; He’s under the hood all day. The phone rings, he can’t answer, the customer hangs up and calls someone else the mechanic is already very busy in the first place so unless he plans on expanding shop the whole thing is a waste of time&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47493339&quot; title=&quot;This is such an important point. My plumber that we always call is extremely busy and usually doesn&amp;#39;t have availability for at least a week. He is a one man shop and prefers it that way. You call his phone, leave a voicemail and he calls you back whenever he is able to. I asked him if he wants to get more business by automating his incoming calls and he said &amp;#39;not really, I am already very busy and have enough business. I don&amp;#39;t need these tools&amp;#39;. So we cannot always assume that the business…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.joanwestenberg.com/collaboration-is-bullshit/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;“Collaboration” is bullshit&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (joanwestenberg.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47484519&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;361 points · 187 comments · by mitchbob&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The article argues that modern &amp;#34;collaboration&amp;#34; has become a performative simulation that prioritizes group consensus and administrative overhead over individual accountability, ultimately stifling productivity and dissolving personal responsibility for outcomes. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.joanwestenberg.com/collaboration-is-bullshit/&quot; title=&quot;Title: &amp;#39;Collaboration&amp;#39; is bullshit.    URL Source: https://www.joanwestenberg.com/collaboration-is-bullshit/    Published Time: 2026-03-22T23:31:25.000Z    Markdown Content:  # &amp;#39;Collaboration&amp;#39; is bullshit.    [![Image 1](https://www.joanwestenberg.com/assets/images/header-mark.png?v=e396019f0c)&amp;gt; Westenberg.](https://www.joanwestenberg.com/)[MENU][1. Home](https://www.joanwestenberg.com/)[2. About](https://www.joanwestenberg.com/about/)[3. RSS](https://www.joanwestenberg.com/rss/)[4.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some argue that collaboration is essential for large-scale achievements like the Linux kernel or space flight &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47484925&quot; title=&quot;Strong words. I wonder if the author has PTSD from poorly managed teams and has never had the fortune to work in a high performance well managed collaborative environment. I agree these are rare compared to the other kind, but they exist. Groups of people can produce more than lone wolves. One person didn&amp;#39;t build the pyramids, the Linux kernel, or Amazon Web services. Even when responsibility for a top level domain rests with a single person, you still have to coordinate the work of people…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47485056&quot; title=&quot;One of the features of my work, these days, is that I work alone. I worked in [pretty high-functioning] teams, for most of my career. Teams are how you do big stuff. I’m really good at what I do, but I’ve been forced to reduce my scope, working alone. I do much smaller projects, than our team used to do. But the killer in teams, is communication overhead, and much of that, is imposed by management, trying to get visibility. If the team is good, they often communicate fine, internally. Most of…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that modern &amp;#34;collaboration&amp;#34; is often a mask for management&amp;#39;s obsession with arbitrary deadlines and visibility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47493875&quot; title=&quot;What I see - and have seen since I started doing this 30+ years ago - is that the date is _always_ more important than the actual deliverable.  Always.  Meeting &amp;#39;the date&amp;#39; is the only thing that&amp;#39;s tracked (but it also never happens).  It&amp;#39;s even justified through vague analogies like Joel Spolsky&amp;#39;s admonition that &amp;#39;you wouldn&amp;#39;t buy a pair of jeans without knowing how much they cost&amp;#39; without ever doing a slightly deeper dive into how developing software is different than selling a pair of jeans.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47485056&quot; title=&quot;One of the features of my work, these days, is that I work alone. I worked in [pretty high-functioning] teams, for most of my career. Teams are how you do big stuff. I’m really good at what I do, but I’ve been forced to reduce my scope, working alone. I do much smaller projects, than our team used to do. But the killer in teams, is communication overhead, and much of that, is imposed by management, trying to get visibility. If the team is good, they often communicate fine, internally. Most of…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47493144&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;trying to get visibility They could review PRs and commits and specs to get visibility and reduce comms overhead, if they had the skills and time . The non-technical manager also takes great conveniences in making technical people spend their time translating things. But no one ever asks the manager to learn new skills as much as they make developers do it.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics highlight that communication overhead and rituals like standups frequently disrupt productivity for the convenience of non-technical managers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47493144&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;trying to get visibility They could review PRs and commits and specs to get visibility and reduce comms overhead, if they had the skills and time . The non-technical manager also takes great conveniences in making technical people spend their time translating things. But no one ever asks the manager to learn new skills as much as they make developers do it.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47493386&quot; title=&quot;The standups are also organized around disrupting a small group of people for the convenience of one.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47493899&quot; title=&quot;Standups should eliminate almost all other meetings engineers need to attend.  Except to go deeper on questions that came up in standup that cannot be instantly resolved. Otherwise yeah there’s really no point.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Proposed solutions to these inefficiencies include designing better performance incentives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47489744&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s interesting that the author does not even consider the impact of incentives on performance. As Charlie Munger famously said, &amp;#39;Show me the incentives, and I&amp;#39;ll show you the outcomes.&amp;#39; It is true that collaboration becomes increasingly difficult as the team grows in size, but collaboration is not the fundamental problem. To manage a large team, the real challenge is to design incentives that properly reward those who produce and perform, and penalize those who don&amp;#39;t. People respond to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; or shifting to a &amp;#34;date-bound&amp;#34; methodology where features are aggressively cut to ensure on-time delivery &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47494559&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; the date is _always_ more important than the actual deliverable. Always. Hah! You just gave me an idea for a new methodology. Date-bound delivery. - The business tells you what they want, as they do - The business tells you when they want it, as they do - The team does not say how long it will take. Instead, they say what they think they can deliver in the time allotted. - As the date nears, more edge features get trimmed - As the date arrives, something is always ready to deliver, no matter…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ykumar.me/blog/eclip-autoresearch/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Autoresearch on an old research idea&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ykumar.me)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47493460&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;427 points · 95 comments · by ykumards&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yogesh Kumar successfully used an LLM agent via Claude Code to automate research on his eCLIP model, achieving a 54% reduction in mean rank error through iterative hyperparameter tuning and code fixes while he performed household chores. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ykumar.me/blog/eclip-autoresearch/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Autoresearch on an old research idea | Blog | Yogesh Kumar    URL Source: https://ykumar.me/blog/eclip-autoresearch/    Markdown Content:  Ever since it showed up on my GH feed, Karpathy’s [Autoresearch](https://ykumar.me/notes#autoresearch) was rattling around in the back of my mind. I wanted to try it on a research problem I fully understood. So this weekend, I picked up my old research code from [eCLIP](https://ykumar.me/notes#eclip), dusted it off the legacy dependencies and gave it to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hacker News users view &amp;#34;autoresearch&amp;#34; as an LLM-powered evolutionary algorithm that automates structural and hyperparameter optimization &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47494206&quot; title=&quot;AFAIK, it&amp;#39;s a bit more than hyper-parameter tuning as it can also make non-parametric (structural) changes. Non-parametric optimization is not a new idea. I guess the hype is partly because people hope it will be less brute force now.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47494335&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s an LLM-powered evolutionary algorithm.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some find value in its ability to brainstorm &amp;#34;prior art&amp;#34; or run experiments overnight &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47493871&quot; title=&quot;I often use LLMs to explore prior art and maybe find some alternative ways of thinking of problems. About 90% of what it tells me is useless or inapplicable to my domain due to a technicality it could not have known, but the other 10% is nice and has helped me learn some great new things. I can’t imagine letting an agent try everything that the LLM chatbot had recommended ($$$). Often coming up in recommendations are very poorly maintained / niche libraries that have quite a lot of content…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47494230&quot; title=&quot;I think the main value lies in allowing the agent to try many things while you aren&amp;#39;t working (when you are sleeping or doing other activities), so even if many tests are not useful, with many trials it can find something nice without any effort on your part. This is, of course, only applicable if doing a single test is relatively fast. In my work a single test can take half a day, so I&amp;#39;d rather not let an agent spend a whole night doing a bogus test.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, critics argue the current output is often limited to basic hyperparameter tuning that may not justify the high token costs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47494104&quot; title=&quot;There are better techniques for hyper-parameter optimisation, right? I fear I have missed something important, why has Autoresearch blown up so much? The bottleneck in AI/ML/DL is always data (volume &amp;amp; quality) or compute. Does/can Autoresearch help improve large-scale datasets?   Is it more compute efficien than humans?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47493988&quot; title=&quot;Ok, so looking at the commit log[1], I was mostly interested in seeing what the &amp;#39;moonshot ideas&amp;#39; implementations looked like, but basically everything is just hyperparameter tuning. Which is nice, but likely not worth the $$$ spent on the tokens. Am I missing something here? [1] https://github.com/ykumards/eCLIP/commits/main/autoresearch&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a consensus that these agents require significant human guidance to be useful, leading to skepticism about whether the business model is sustainable without massive subsidies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47493989&quot; title=&quot;I find LLMs useful in regurgitating one-liners that I can’t be bothered to remember or things where even being flat out wrong is okay and you just do it yourself. For all the folks spending a lot of time and energy in setting up MCP servers, AGENTS.md, etc. I think this represents more that the LLM cannot do what it is being sold as by AI boosters and needs extreme amounts of guidance to reach a desired goal, if it even can. This is not an argument that the tech has no value. It clearly can be…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47493952&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; agent try everything that the LLM chatbot had recommended ($$$) A lot depends on whether it is expensive to you. I use Claude Code for the smallest of whims and rarely run out of tokens on my Max plan.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://indieweb.org/POSSE&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;POSSE – Publish on your Own Site, Syndicate Elsewhere&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (indieweb.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47486726&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;414 points · 82 comments · by tosh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;**POSSE** (Publish on your Own Site, Syndicate Elsewhere) is an IndieWeb strategy where users post content to their own domains first before sharing copies or links to social media silos. This practice ensures data ownership and canonical URLs while allowing friends to interact with the content on their preferred platforms. &lt;a href=&quot;https://indieweb.org/POSSE&quot; title=&quot;Title: POSSE    URL Source: https://indieweb.org/POSSE    Published Time: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 16:23:55 GMT    Markdown Content:  # POSSE - IndieWeb  [Jump to content](https://indieweb.org/POSSE#bodyContent)    - [x] Main menu     Main menu    move to sidebar hide     Explore the IndieWeb     *   [🗽 Principles](https://indieweb.org/principles)  *   [📜 Community posts](https://stream.indieweb.org/)  *   [🌐 Visit a random site](https://xn--sr8hvo.ws/random)  *   [🌱 Get a personal…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The POSSE (Publish on your Own Site, Syndicate Elsewhere) strategy is praised as a vital way to &amp;#34;own the land you build on&amp;#34; and work in public, though users note it is increasingly difficult to automate as social media platforms intentionally disincentivize external links &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47486940&quot; title=&quot;I follow this approach. It&amp;#39;s mostly because I want to own the land I build on. It works well, but it&amp;#39;s hard to automate. In the end you must manually cross-post, and both the post and the discussion will vary by community. You end up being active in multiple different communities and still getting little traffic from the effort. It&amp;#39;s not such a great way to drive traffic. On the other hand, it&amp;#39;s a wonderful way to work in public.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47487245&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It works well, but it&amp;#39;s hard to automate That&amp;#39;s because social media sites have purposefully made it hard (or relatively expensive) to post on their platforms with automated tools - they specifically don&amp;#39;t want you to POSSE Facebook also deprioritises posts with links in them to disincentivize people using their platform to promote their own primary source, that&amp;#39;s why there&amp;#39;s the &amp;#39;link in comments&amp;#39; crap.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue the practice often feels &amp;#34;impersonal and spammy&amp;#34; because it lacks audience-specific context, resulting in the same content being &amp;#34;dumped&amp;#34; across multiple platforms simultaneously &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47487846&quot; title=&quot;As someone on the receiving end of POSSE, who is often on the multiple platforms people post to, this approach ends up feeling impersonal and spammy. I totally get the reasoning people have for doing it. But, to me, it&amp;#39;s very &amp;#39;ship it&amp;#39; focused, rather than conversation focused. Maybe I&amp;#39;m just getting old.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47487985&quot; title=&quot;Impersonal in the sense the article etc isn&amp;#39;t being presented for the specific audience. It&amp;#39;s just being dumped everywhere with the same contextual text (&amp;#39;Wrote this piece about....&amp;#39;). So, I&amp;#39;m seeing it everywhere in the exact same way. Which feels way spammy (and which I&amp;#39;ve admittedly had to do myself, as per the times). But, I&amp;#39;m used to feeling like the person I follow is posting stuff to the community in language specific to their readers. I say &amp;#39;used to&amp;#39;, but I&amp;#39;m probably thinking back…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see syndication as a necessary way to reach friends on big tech platforms, others view it as an exhausting &amp;#34;game&amp;#34; and prefer focusing on the open web or emerging protocols like atproto &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47487922&quot; title=&quot;atproto feels like a move in the right direction for personal publishing that makes content discovery easier withtout the need to post to multiple channels / platforms. https://standard.site/ is one initiative working towards making this a reality.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47489297&quot; title=&quot;I feel conflicted with this view. It feels partially like something social media giants would advocate, the idea that their little social media platform is some special community where people are different and normal open web rules shouldn&amp;#39;t apply. I feel the philosophy of posting on the web and hosting your own website is that the web is the community with which I want to share my thoughts. If I just wanted to share my thoughts with just one platform/community, I would go and just post it on…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47488471&quot; title=&quot;If I werent more critical, I would have read this as an astroturf by big tech sort of thing. Like &amp;#39;it&amp;#39;s inevitable that big tech will win, and so therefore syndicate everywhere or you have lost the game.&amp;#39; I dont really get what game we&amp;#39;re playing though. Why do I care if my friend who only uses Facebook sees my blog posts? What do I get from that other than the feeling of a maybe-connection (much like their criticism of federated networks - youre hoping for a future where this works out for…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pcworld.com/article/3096432/lgs-new-1hz-display-is-the-secret-behind-a-new-laptops-battery-life.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LG&amp;#39;s new 1Hz display is the secret behind a new laptop&amp;#39;s battery life&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (pcworld.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47495245&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;317 points · 169 comments · by robotnikman&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LG has introduced &amp;#34;Oxide 1Hz&amp;#34; display technology that varies refresh rates from 1Hz to 120Hz, potentially extending laptop battery life by up to 48%. Dell has already adopted the panel for its XPS lineup, and LG plans to mass-produce 1Hz OLED versions by 2027. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pcworld.com/article/3096432/lgs-new-1hz-display-is-the-secret-behind-a-new-laptops-battery-life.html&quot; title=&quot;LG&amp;#39;s new 1Hz display is the secret behind a new laptop&amp;#39;s battery life    LG unveils the Oxide 1Hz panel, which appears in a new flagship laptop and will be added to external displays. The 1Hz refresh rate can extend battery life by almost 50 percent.    * [News](https://www.pcworld.com/news)    + [All News](https://www.pcworld.com/news)    + [Accessories](https://www.pcworld.com/accessories/news)    + [Business](https://www.pcworld.com/business/news)    +…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While light emission is a major power draw, commenters explain that high refresh rates consume significant energy because the GPU must render more frames &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47549968&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s definitely a few reasons but one of them is that you have to ask the GPU to do ~60x less work when you render 60x less frames&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; and the display electronics must repeatedly drive column line capacitances to prevent flicker or charge loss &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47551286&quot; title=&quot;I used to be a display architect about 15 years back (for Qualcomm mirasol, et al), so my knowledge of the specifics / numbers is outdated.  Sharing what I know. High pixel density displays have disproportionately higher display refresh power (not just proportional to the total number of pixels as the column lines capacitances need to be driven again for writing each row of pixels).  This was an important concern as high pixel densities were coming along. Display needs fast refreshing not just…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While low refresh rates (1Hz) have existed in watches and phones for years &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47496747&quot; title=&quot;Haven&amp;#39;t phones, watches and tablets been using low refresh rates to enable battery improvements for a while? The Apple Watch Series 5 (2019) has a refresh rate down to 1Hz. M4 iPad Pro lacks always-on display despite OLED panel with variable refresh rate (2024): https://9to5mac.com/2024/05/09/m4-ipad-pro-always-on-display...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, applying this to laptops allows for massive power savings during static tasks like reading or typing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47549792&quot; title=&quot;From what I understand, the laptop will reduce the refresh rate (of the entire display) to as low as 1Hz if what is being displayed effectively “allows” it. For example: - reading an article with intermittent scrolling - typing with periodic breaks&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some users remain skeptical of the &amp;#34;48 percent&amp;#34; battery life claim, noting that real-world performance often falls far short of manufacturer benchmarks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47550229&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s the real-world battery life though?  My mac gets 8 hours real world; 16 in benchmarks; 24 claimed by apple. Assuming the xps has the same size battery, and this really reduces power consumption by 48%, I&amp;#39;d expect 16 hours real world, 32 in benchmarks and 48 in some workload Dell can cherry pick.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://neilkakkar.com/productive-with-claude-code.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How I&amp;#39;m Productive with Claude Code&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (neilkakkar.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47494890&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;280 points · 165 comments · by neilkakkar&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Neil Kakkar explains how he increased his engineering output by using Claude Code to automate PR creation, UI verification, and parallel workflows, shifting his role from a manual implementer to a manager of AI agents. &lt;a href=&quot;https://neilkakkar.com/productive-with-claude-code.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: How I’m Productive with Claude Code    URL Source: https://neilkakkar.com/productive-with-claude-code.html    Published Time: 2026-03-16T08:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  It’s been about 6 weeks since I joined Tano, and this is what my commit history looks like:    ![Image 1: Commit history graph over the last 6 weeks](https://neilkakkar.com/assets/images/commit-history-graph.png)  Commits are a terrible metric for output, but they’re the most visible signal I have. Something real changed in…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether increased commit volume and PR throughput are valid metrics for AI-driven productivity, with critics arguing these are &amp;#34;repackaged&amp;#34; legacy metrics that ignore code quality, maintenance burdens, and the &amp;#34;fried&amp;#34; mental state caused by rapid context-switching &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47495381&quot; title=&quot;This is the &amp;#39;lines of code per week&amp;#39; metric from the 90s, repackaged. &amp;#39;I&amp;#39;m doing more PRs&amp;#39; is not evidence that AI is working, it&amp;#39;s evidence that you are merging more.   Whether thats good depends entirely on what you are merging.  I use AI every day too. But treating throughput of code going to production as a success metric, without any mention of quality, bugs, or maintenance burden is exactly the kind of thinking developers used to push back on when management proposed it. Turns out we…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47495272&quot; title=&quot;I like llms too, and I think they make me more productive.. but a chart of commits/contribs is such a lousy metric for productivity. It&amp;#39;s about on par with the ridiculousness of LOC implying code quality.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47495300&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The worktree system removed the friction of context-switching - juggling multiple streams of work without them colliding. I&amp;#39;m so conflicted about this. On the one hand I love the buzz of feeling so productive and working on many different threads. On the other hand my brain gets so fried, and I think this is a big contributor.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents suggest that for solo developers, these spikes represent a genuine overcoming of procrastination and &amp;#34;monumental&amp;#34; task paralysis, though they acknowledge that manual review remains a significant time investment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47495849&quot; title=&quot;Honest question: if you&amp;#39;re using multiple agents, it&amp;#39;s usually to produce not a dozen lines of code. It&amp;#39;s to produce a big enough feature spanning multiple files, modules and entry points, with tests and all. So far so good. But once that feature is written by the agents... wouldn&amp;#39;t you review it? Like reading line by line what&amp;#39;s going on and detecting if something is off? And wouldn&amp;#39;t that part, the manual reviewing, take an enormous amount of time compare to the time it took the agents to…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47495428&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know. Claude helped me implement a ton of features I had been procrastinating for months in a matter of days. I&amp;#39;m implementing features in my project faster than I can blog about them. It definitely manifested as a huge commit spike. And it&amp;#39;s not like I&amp;#39;m blindly commiting LLM output. I often write everything myself because I want to understand what I&amp;#39;m doing. Claude often comments that my version is better and cleaner. It&amp;#39;s just that the tasks seemed so monumental I felt paralyzed and…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47496437&quot; title=&quot;Here&amp;#39;s the thing every discussion around this tries to weasel around: All else being equal, yes, more PRs is a signal of productivity. It&amp;#39;s not the only metric. But I&amp;#39;m more and more convinced that the people protesting any discussion of it are the ones who... don&amp;#39;t ship a lot. Of course it matters in what code base. What size PR. How many bugs. Maintenance burden. Complexity. All of that doesn&amp;#39;t go away. But that doesn&amp;#39;t disqualify the metric, it just points out it&amp;#39;s not a one-dimensional…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond mere code generation, users find immense value in using Claude as a &amp;#34;talking encyclopedia&amp;#34; for architectural planning and learning new frameworks, suggesting that the time saved by agents should be reinvested into rigorous automated testing, linting, and frequent code audits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47497401&quot; title=&quot;Maybe OT - I find Claude Code hit or miss, I spend a lot of time removing dumb code or asking Claude to remove it eg &amp;#39;why do you have a separate...&amp;#39; Claude: &amp;#39;Good catch — there&amp;#39;s no real reason....&amp;#39; and so on. Where I find it incredible - learning new things, I recently started flutter/dart dev - I just ask Claude to tell me about the bits, or explaining things to me, it&amp;#39;s truly revolutionary imho, I&amp;#39;m building things in flutter after a week without reading a book or manual. It&amp;#39;s like a talking…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47496198&quot; title=&quot;Here&amp;#39;s what I suggest: Serious planning. The plans should include constraints, scope, escalation criteria, completion criteria, test and documentation plan. Enforce single responsibility, cqrs, domain segregation, etc. Make the code as easy for you to reason about as possible. Enforce domain naming and function / variable naming conventions to make the code as easy to talk about as possible. Use code review bots (Sourcery, CodeRabbit, and Codescene). They catch the small things (violations of…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/resumex/doom-over-dns&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;DOOM Over DNS&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47490705&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;343 points · 89 comments · by Venn1&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This project enables users to play the shareware version of DOOM by fetching the game&amp;#39;s compressed data and engine DLLs entirely from DNS TXT records. Using a PowerShell script, the game loads directly into memory from public DNS queries without ever saving files to the disk. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/resumex/doom-over-dns&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - resumex/doom-over-dns: Play Doom entirely from DNS records. (PowerShell 7+)    URL Source: https://github.com/resumex/doom-over-dns    Markdown Content:  # GitHub - resumex/doom-over-dns: Play Doom entirely from DNS records. (PowerShell 7+) · GitHub    [Skip to content](https://github.com/resumex/doom-over-dns#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [](https://github.com/)    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users find the project to be a fun proof of concept &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47536608&quot; title=&quot;Look, if this was a project on using DNS to replace Dropbox or something, I&amp;#39;d agree with you. But the demo version of Doom just isn&amp;#39;t that large; Cloudflare will host much larger files than that for free via Cloudflare Pages/Workers. This project is clearly meant as a fun proof of concept, not some novel way to host 3 MB for free.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others criticize it as an abuse of the &amp;#34;honor system&amp;#34; that governs public infrastructure, comparing it to exploiting free resources in bad faith &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47536416&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Cloudflare will serve them globally, for free, cached at the edge, to anyone who asks. They are not a file storage system. They were not designed to be a file storage system. Nobody at the IETF was thinking about them being used as a file storage system when they wrote RFC 1035. And yet here we are. Yeah these types of hacker stories kind of bug me. They are sort of in the same vein as &amp;#39;you can eat for free by going to McDonald&amp;#39;s and eating a pint of ketchup without ordering anything&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;How…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters clarify that the title is misleading because DNS is being used strictly for storage rather than computation; the game is not &amp;#34;running&amp;#34; on the protocol itself &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47533662&quot; title=&quot;To clarify, a good title would be &amp;#39;Loading Doom entirely from DNS records&amp;#39; Neither one plays Doom over DNS nor is the first paragraph in the README correct, because DNS is only abused for storage, not for computing/processing/executing instructions: &amp;gt; At some point, a reasonable person asked &amp;#39;DNS resolves names to IP addresses, what else can it do?&amp;#39; The answer, apparently, is run DOOM.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47533671&quot; title=&quot;“Run” is doing a lot of heavy lifting at this point.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47534177&quot; title=&quot;You were right to assume that in this case. DNS is not running doom here, it&amp;#39;s just storing it.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also explores similar unconventional data storage methods, such as steganography &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47536735&quot; title=&quot;I’ve heard rumors that DNS records are also sometimes used in some steganography-type communications. Great way of passing small messages in a ubiquitous and innocuous system, unlikely to be blocked or raise eyebrows by accessing.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt; or distributing encrypted file chunks across various free hosting sites and forums &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47534910&quot; title=&quot;I once had this silly idea to create distributed storage of arbitrary data by exploiting a range of completely unrelated sites. Say, when you want to upload your file to the System, it may store one encrypted chunk as an image on a free image hosting site, another chunk as an encoded blog post on a random forum about farming (or in the user profile?), another chunk as a youtube video, etc. Imagine having something like hundreds or thousands of such &amp;#39;backends&amp;#39;. Every chunk would be stored in 3…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47533659&quot; title=&quot;This novel form of data storage reminds of me of this classic YouTube video, Harder Drive: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcJSW7Rprio&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://travel.state.gov/en/international-travel/travel-advisories/global-events/worldwide-caution.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Department of State advises Americans worldwide to exercise increased caution&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (travel.state.gov)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47484208&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;170 points · &lt;strong&gt;249 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by supernova215&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The U.S. Department of State has issued a worldwide security alert advising Americans to exercise increased caution due to potential targeting of U.S. interests by groups supportive of Iran, specifically highlighting risks in the Middle East and possible travel disruptions from periodic airspace closures. &lt;a href=&quot;https://travel.state.gov/en/international-travel/travel-advisories/global-events/worldwide-caution.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Worldwide Caution    URL Source: https://travel.state.gov/en/international-travel/travel-advisories/global-events/worldwide-caution.html    Published Time: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 20:27:49 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Worldwide Caution    [Skip to content](https://travel.state.gov/en/international-travel/travel-advisories/global-events/worldwide-caution.html#tsg_upper_section_root_container)    ![Image 1: US Flag](https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/tsg_aem/banner-images/us_flag_small%201.png)    An…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion reflects deep polarization regarding U.S. foreign policy, with some users blaming the current administration for escalating global tensions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47484332&quot; title=&quot;Crazy how effective at making everything worse this admin has been.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47484257&quot; title=&quot;I am tired of winning.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt; while others point to Iran’s role in regional instability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47484787&quot; title=&quot;I worked in the Pentagon for 10 years, and got my beak wet with neural nets there very early, back when we were using Playstation 3s for their GPUs. I was staunchly against the Iraq war, but even when Bush was president I didn&amp;#39;t let it compromise my patriotism. The amount of people on here who ignore the fact that Iran was the primary enabler of Hamas&amp;#39; attack on 10/7/23, and therefore sowed the seeds of the destruction of Gaza, is insane.  Basically, if Trump does a thing, they are against it,…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant disagreement exists over the necessity and objectives of recent military actions, with critics arguing that the intervention lacks clear justification and contradicts previous isolationist promises &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47484343&quot; title=&quot;Has there been any official WH note on the need for this war, yet? Or objectives?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47485078&quot; title=&quot;I highly disagree, one clear thing conservatives and liberals largely agree on is no more wars in the Middle East. It’s astonishing to me that Trump supporters who voted for an isolationist policy are happy with him intervening in the Middle East (not to mention South America) again. Yes, I am “reactively” hating our president for starting wars without congressional approval and with very handwavy explanations. Besides, he has a track record for saying whatever the fuck he wants if he thinks…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47484603&quot; title=&quot;What the fuck was even the intended purpose of starting this war in Iran? Like in their mind, what was the best case scenario?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, some commenters express personal anxiety about visiting the U.S. due to domestic instability, citing concerns over government shutdowns and increased militarization at airports &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47484293&quot; title=&quot;Funny, everyone outside of the US should exercise increased caution when dealing with or visiting the US.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47484463&quot; title=&quot;I travelled to the US some weeks ago and was anxious but everything turned out ok. I&amp;#39;m happy I don&amp;#39;t have to go back any time soon.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47484422&quot; title=&quot;The U.S. government shutdown has halted pay to the TSA, but not ICE, so ICE is taking over from the TSA in airports[1].  If you fly to the U.S., starting Monday apparently, the first think you&amp;#39;re likely to see is masked gunmen giving you the eye. No thankyou. [1] https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cede0qyvqz3o&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.boxyuwu.blog/posts/an-incoherent-rust/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;An incoherent Rust&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (boxyuwu.blog)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47490648&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;244 points · 166 comments · by emschwartz&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author proposes &amp;#34;incoherent traits&amp;#34; and named trait implementations to solve Rust&amp;#39;s ecosystem development issues caused by strict coherence and orphan rules, which currently make it difficult for new libraries to replace established foundational crates like `serde`. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.boxyuwu.blog/posts/an-incoherent-rust/&quot; title=&quot;Title: An Incoherent Rust    URL Source: https://www.boxyuwu.blog/posts/an-incoherent-rust/    Published Time: 2026-03-23T14:00:00Z    Markdown Content:  # An Incoherent Rust | BoxyUwU    [BoxyUwU](https://www.boxyuwu.blog/ &amp;#39;BoxyUwU (Alt + H)&amp;#39;)    # An Incoherent Rust    March 23, 2026    No LLMs were involved in the process of writing this blog post.    ## Stunted Ecosystem Development[#](https://www.boxyuwu.blog/posts/an-incoherent-rust/#stunted-ecosystem-development)    The Rust ecosystem has a fundamental…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the increasing complexity of Rust&amp;#39;s type system and syntax, with some users fearing it is losing its &amp;#34;fully-graspable&amp;#34; nature in favor of academic theory &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47496005&quot; title=&quot;This is one of the (several?) things that make me very worried about Rust long-term.  I love the language, and reach for it even when it sometimes isn&amp;#39;t the most appropriate thing.  But reading some of the made-up syntax in the &amp;#39;Removing Coherence&amp;#39; section makes my head hurt. When I used to write Scala, I accepted the fact that I don&amp;#39;t have a background in type/set/etc. theory, and that there were some facets of the language that I&amp;#39;d probably never understand, and some code that others had…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that Rust&amp;#39;s strict rules like coherence have historically improved ecosystem quality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47494820&quot; title=&quot;This isn&amp;#39;t a new discussion it was there around the early rust days too. And IMHO coherence and orphan rules have majorly contributed to the quality of the eco system.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest that proposed technical workarounds for these rules are merely &amp;#34;technical solutions to people problems&amp;#34; that could lead to package proliferation and cruft &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47495281&quot; title=&quot;Note the use case - someone wants to have the ability to replace a base-level crate such as serde. When something near the bottom needs work, should there be a process for fixing it, which is a people problem? Or should there be a mechanism for bypassing it, which is a technical solution to a people problem? This is one of the curses of open source.  The first approach means that there will be confrontations which must be resolved. The second means a proliferation of very similar packages. This…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Comparisons to C++ reveal a divide: some believe Rust remains simpler than the &amp;#34;absolute complexity&amp;#34; of C++&amp;#39;s name lookup and initialization rules &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47496460&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I wonder if C++ has some hairy concepts and syntax today on par with Rust&amp;#39;s more difficult parts. … … … … Unqualified name lookup has been challenging in C++ since even before C++11. Overload resolution rules are so painful that it took me weeks to review a patch simply because I had to back out of trying to make sense of the rules in the standard. There&amp;#39;s several slightly different definitions of initialization. If you really want to get in the weeds, starting playing around with…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend that modern C++20 is cleaner and more expressive than its legacy reputation suggests &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47497295&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I wonder if C++ has some hairy concepts and syntax today Both better and worse. The current version of idiomatic C++ is much cleaner, more concise, and more powerful than the version of C++ you are familiar with. You don&amp;#39;t need C-style macros anymore. The insane template metaprogramming hacks are gone. Some important things that were problematic to express in C++ (and other systems languages to be fair) are now fully defined e.g. std::launder. C++ now has expansive compile-time programming…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47500941&quot; title=&quot;First of all mem::transmute is like bit_cast (which works perfectly fine in constexpr context), not reinterpret cast. Second, this compiles just fine: constexpr int ivalue = 1;     constexpr bool bvalue {ivalue}; This fails at compile time (invalid narrowing): constexpr int ivalue = 2;      constexpr bool bvalue {ivalue}; Note we don&amp;#39;t need bit_cast for this example as int to bool conversions are allowed in C++.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jackhogan.me/blog/box-of-secrets/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Box of Secrets: Discreetly modding an apartment intercom to work with Apple Home&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jackhogan.me)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47488686&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;283 points · 114 comments · by jackhogan11&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After their landlord failed to fix a broken intercom, two friends discreetly modded an apartment gate by installing an ESP32 relay board inside a junction box to enable remote unlocking via Apple Home and the Matter protocol. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jackhogan.me/blog/box-of-secrets/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Box of Secrets    URL Source: https://www.jackhogan.me/blog/box-of-secrets/    Published Time: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 22:30:16 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Box of Secrets | Jack Hogan  # Box of Secrets    [](https://www.jackhogan.me/blog)  # Box of Secrets    ## Discreetly modding my friend’s apartment intercom to work with Apple Home.    ## 23 March 2026    ### Tags: [hacking](https://www.jackhogan.me/blog/tag:hacking), [hardware](https://www.jackhogan.me/blog/tag:hardware),…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide between users seeking modern intercom solutions and those who view such technology as a symptom of &amp;#34;antisocial&amp;#34; behavior or laziness &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47498886&quot; title=&quot;I’m actually pretty surprised how bad the intercom ecosystem is these days. Why aren’t there more ‘semi dumb’ Ethernet or wifi products that just let you announce that dinner is ready? It doesn’t need to be a fully ruggedised commercial system like this one or a fully integrated cloud managed solution like ring. The cheap no name wireless ones can’t handle comms between rooms, let alone across a house. The security implications aren’t insurmountable - you could use pairing codes if there are…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47499834&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Why aren’t there more ‘semi dumb’ Ethernet or wifi products that just let you announce that dinner is ready? Because of 2 reasons 1) this is very antisocial behavior. 2) so many people have a mobile phone at arm&amp;#39;s reach a majority of the time so there you have your intercom. Well educated members of an household would know when dinner is ready because they would actually help make it ready for everyone. Occasionally one teenager could legitimately focus on homework but it is not actually a…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47502151&quot; title=&quot;Needing an app or tech device to announce to your spouse and children at home that dinner is ready is beyond antisocial, actually. It&amp;#39;s ridiculously sad and pathetic. And then people will complain that children these days spend their time in front of a screen... I think @prmoustache is also referring to manners in general.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that smart speakers like HomePod or Alexa already fill this niche, others find these devices unreliable or prefer &amp;#34;semi-dumb&amp;#34; local hardware over cloud-managed ecosystems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47498886&quot; title=&quot;I’m actually pretty surprised how bad the intercom ecosystem is these days. Why aren’t there more ‘semi dumb’ Ethernet or wifi products that just let you announce that dinner is ready? It doesn’t need to be a fully ruggedised commercial system like this one or a fully integrated cloud managed solution like ring. The cheap no name wireless ones can’t handle comms between rooms, let alone across a house. The security implications aren’t insurmountable - you could use pairing codes if there are…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47499036&quot; title=&quot;Apple&amp;#39;s HomePod Mini and Google Home and Alexa all support intercom modes. I&amp;#39;d presume they typically handle the home case for the majority of folks.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47499646&quot; title=&quot;HomePod Mini is a waste of money, unless you like screaming at your dumb robot that never understands what you want it to do Setting timers works well though&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. The specific project in the article drew sharp criticism for its legal and ethical risks, with commenters noting that resetting root passwords and bypassing shared door controllers could constitute felonies or CFAA violations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47499518&quot; title=&quot;Confessing to felonies, in writing, under one’s real name is wild. Here’s hoping nobody decides to bother them about this.  I’m not a lawyer but this appears to this layperson at the very least a CFAA violation by accessing the router and resetting its root password, as well as possibly criminal mischief as well as whatever stealing AC power is. You couldn’t pay me to do a writeup like this, and I’d be wearing gloves the whole time.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47502464&quot; title=&quot;Legally and ethically extremely dubious, hooked up to the box in your apartment, I can understand it. Hooked to the shared door controller, handing out access &amp;#39;keys&amp;#39; to all your friends, not great. You seem to know this based on all your attempts to avoid discovery.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, users shared anecdotes about using Raspberry Pis to bypass university security systems and expressed frustration with the high costs and proprietary lock-in of modern home automation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47499504&quot; title=&quot;Frank&amp;#39;s guests just need to get the Doorking 16120 default key and start letting themselves in. Edit: undergrad shenanigans from ten years ago: Our university student-run electronics lab had an issue: technically anyone with a student card was allowed on premises at any given time, but the department only gave us a small set of keys that we had to share with the rest of the student associations. Obviously we needed a solution. We did some snooping and found that the request-to-exit button wire…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47500468&quot; title=&quot;This reminds me of another annoyance I have. We have a wall mounted thermostat using batteries at the cabin. It controls how much water is let through from the central heating to the floors by sending some radio signal. I would like to be able to control this remotely, for instance to turn on heating a day before arrival. But the only way to do this is to buy a new unit connected to the pipes as well and upgrade the whole thing, which was quoted like $2k++ and need their app and their…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/03/20/cyberattack-on-vehicle-breathalyzer-company-leaves-drivers-stranded-across-the-us/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cyberattack on vehicle breathalyzer company leaves drivers stranded in the US&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techcrunch.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47489058&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;162 points · &lt;strong&gt;190 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A cyberattack on the vehicle breathalyzer company Intoxalock has left drivers across the U.S. stranded because the system downtime prevents the mandatory device calibrations required to start their cars. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/03/20/cyberattack-on-vehicle-breathalyzer-company-leaves-drivers-stranded-across-the-us/&quot; title=&quot;Cyberattack on vehicle breathalyzer company leaves drivers stranded across the US | TechCrunch    A cyberattack on a U.S. car breathalyzer company has left drivers across the United States reportedly stranded and unable to start their vehicles.    [![](https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/tc-lockup.svg) TechCrunch Desktop Logo](https://techcrunch.com)    [![](https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/tc-logo-mobile.svg) TechCrunch Mobile Logo](https://techcrunch.com)    *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The cyberattack on vehicle breathalyzer companies has sparked a debate over the ethics of interlock devices, with some arguing they represent a &amp;#34;never-ending punishment&amp;#34; for criminals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47489611&quot; title=&quot;I guarantee that basically nothing will come out of this. People dont willingly put these alcohol breathalyzer interlocks on their vehicles. They&amp;#39;re 100% court mandated, as a punishment for, usually, drunk driving. This country is so hell-bent on making criminals&amp;#39; lives worse and worse as a never-ending punishment. So what 150k people cant use their cars. &amp;#39;They did something wrong and deserve it&amp;#39;, is the usual motto in the USA. Now, lets have a discussion about software liability....&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend that U.S. DUI laws are actually &amp;#34;ridiculously permissive&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47489905&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This country is so hell-bent on making criminals&amp;#39; lives worse and worse as a never-ending punishment. Interlock devices are typically mandated for 6-12 months if it&amp;#39;s your first DUI. In California, you will be mandated to use it for three years after your fourth (!) DUI. DUI laws in many parts of the US are ridiculously permissive and your criticism is pretty off-base.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters highlight significant safety and reliability flaws, such as devices requiring drivers to blow into a camera while moving to prevent mid-drive drinking &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47490105&quot; title=&quot;I once helped someone get their car home after one of these was installed. Their license would not be returned until it was installed, but they weren&amp;#39;t allowed to leave it on the lot. Someone else drove it there, and then I got to experience the breathalyzer to drive it home. The interesting part is how bad the interlock was. First off, it can apparently randomly not work, so you get three tries. Worse yet, per the official documentation, apparently they can misdetect an ignition while driving…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47490744&quot; title=&quot;Having to blow while you&amp;#39;re already driving is supposed to be a feature. It&amp;#39;s to dissuade people from successfully turning on their car, immediately drinking, and then driving.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47491669&quot; title=&quot;Is this comment a joke or do you not understand how dangerous it is to ask a driver to blow into a breathalyzer while operating a vehicle? All this seems to be is a company collecting corporate welfare while doing the bare minimum. Such companies should both be sanctioned and have their leadership investigated for potential fraud. If you receive public dollars to function, the public should expect some modicum of sensibility and accountability.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest that offenders simply shouldn&amp;#39;t be driving at all &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47491722&quot; title=&quot;I think they shouldn’t be driving in the first place.  Suspend DL for one year and move on.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that losing a vehicle in the U.S. is a &amp;#34;cruel and unusual punishment&amp;#34; because car-centric infrastructure makes it impossible to work or live without one &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47490314&quot; title=&quot;The issue here has nothing to do with the device and everything to do with the fact that car-brained America is so cowardly and broken that they will do some Rube Goldberg stunt before they even consider taking cars away from alcoholics.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47490402&quot; title=&quot;Nobody in human rights would allow that.  Take away the car and people cannot live. The above is sadly serious. It is almost impossible to find a job and a house you can afford in walking distance of each other, demanding there be things like grocery shopping as well make it not feasible for most people. Taking away someone&amp;#39;s car is cruel and usual punishment that cannot be accepted.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong call for a &amp;#34;software building code&amp;#34; to establish mandatory minimum specifications and liability for critical systems that can strand thousands&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/andreasjansson/win-3.1-backgrounds&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Windows 3.1 tiled background .bmp archive&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47496221&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;275 points · 75 comments · by justsomehnguy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This GitHub repository serves as a digital archive of tiled .bmp background images and screenshots from Windows 3.1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/andreasjansson/win-3.1-backgrounds&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - andreasjansson/win-3.1-backgrounds: Windows 3.1 tiled background .bmp archive    URL Source: https://github.com/andreasjansson/win-3.1-backgrounds    Markdown Content:  # GitHub - andreasjansson/win-3.1-backgrounds: Windows 3.1 tiled background .bmp archive · GitHub    [Skip to content](https://github.com/andreasjansson/win-3.1-backgrounds#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [](https://github.com/)    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The collection of Windows 3.1 tiled backgrounds sparked a discussion on the shift in desktop usage, with users noting that modern workflows rarely leave wallpapers visible compared to the era of minimized windows &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47497935&quot; title=&quot;I sort of miss when my way of using GUI desktops involved the wallpaper sometimes being visible. These days It’s all quarter/half/full windows that rarely close, and certainly are never minimized.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users shared personal anecdotes about using classic Packard Bell tiles for nostalgia &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47496949&quot; title=&quot;Here&amp;#39;s someone&amp;#39;s personal archive of weird miscellanea, including old Windows wallpapers which is what reminded me. I use unironically use the classic Packard Bell tile background on my computers because it reminds me of my grandmother&amp;#39;s PC which is one of the first I ever used. https://www.dvd3000.ca/wp/extra/pb.html&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others debated the tactile quality of vintage keyboards &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47496813&quot; title=&quot;Love that. As an aside, that keyboard in particular had the best click I&amp;#39;ve ever experienced.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47497241&quot; title=&quot;Better than the Model M?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt; and identified &amp;#34;Propaganda&amp;#34; as a prominent source for early Linux tiled textures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47497377&quot; title=&quot;I know this isnt related to the post, but does anyone remember the artist or website that had a bunch of cool textures and colorful tiled wallpaper for the early days of linux? think mid-90s. I&amp;#39;ve been scratching my head for years and my searches have never found it, but there has to be some white beards here that can recall it. I remember there were some really cool options available, I believe in a square format for better tiling. If anyone can remember and post a link or archive I would very…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47497474&quot; title=&quot;If it&amp;#39;s what I&amp;#39;m thinking of, it was the &amp;#39;Propaganda&amp;#39; wallpapers. I remember using them in Red Hat 6 in the late 90s! https://github.com/BenjaminHCCarr/PropagandaTiles Seems to match what&amp;#39;s in the desktop-backgrounds RPM on this ISO (CD 1) https://archive.org/details/red-hat-linux-6.1&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The thread also highlighted multimedia nostalgia through period-accurate tutorial videos and interactive web recreations of the Windows 3.1 era &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47496626&quot; title=&quot;If you want your nostalgia in multimedia - https://canyonmid.com/&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47496832&quot; title=&quot;we have a crt tv with built in vhs in our office and have a bunch of old tapes one is “Mastering Windows 3.1” it’s fun to run in the background while working for your enjoyment, here’s a similar 3.1 tutorial video from that era uploaded to YouTube https://youtu.be/KRi5mjMgORk?si=OFH7UhOQif5EUCtg&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-03-22</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-03-22</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hormuz.pythonic.ninja/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hormuz Minesweeper – Are you tired of winning?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (hormuz.pythonic.ninja)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47475686&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;623 points · 426 comments · by PythonicNinja&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hormuz Minesweeper is a web-based version of the classic puzzle game where players reveal tiles and flag mines that only spawn on water. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hormuz.pythonic.ninja/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Hormuz Minesweeper    URL Source: https://hormuz.pythonic.ninja/    Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.    Markdown Content:  # Hormuz Minesweeper    Hormuz Minesweeper    [Star](https://github.com/PythonicNinja/hormuz-minesweeper)−□×    000    reset    READY to start winning!!!    Left-click reveal. Right-click flag. Double-click chord. Mines only spawn on water.    dig mode    Another win?&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether military intervention in the Strait of Hormuz is justified by geopolitical interests and oil price stability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47476508&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s it? Momentary gasoline price is all that matters now? Not geopolitical interests, alliances, _Doing The Right Thing_? If that&amp;#39;s the only angle you care about, then US subduing the Iranian regime would go a long way to de-facto dissolving OPEC and bring much more flexibility to oil prices.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt; or if such actions constitute &amp;#34;unjustified wars of aggression&amp;#34; that lead to tragic civilian casualties &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47476798&quot; title=&quot;I think that if you start an unjustified war of agression against a country and you kill 150 children, you should be held responsible&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that mistakes like bombing a school should not deter military objectives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47476699&quot; title=&quot;Do you think some evil military planners sat in the Pentagon, saw that school, said &amp;#39;let&amp;#39;s shoot at it for shits and giggles&amp;#39; and pressed the button? Or are you trying to pollute a grown up conversation with sensationalism and punchy hooks? In reality someone made a mistake. It can happen. It should be investigated. It should not deter from achieving the military objectives.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that moral relativism cannot justify the violation of international sovereignty &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47477134&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; someone worse You do not get to decide that. If we allow everyone to invade other countries and murder leaders because they deem those people worse than themselves, the world will be engaged in endless war. Or do you think perhaps deciding who to invade and kill is a special privilege reserved only for your country, which should be emperor of the world?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47477245&quot; title=&quot;With this reasoning, how do you make any decisions in your everyday life? Does everything look like a morally relativistic gray to you?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Disagreements also persist regarding the current state of the Strait, with conflicting reports on whether it is a minefield or a controlled passage charging high transit fees &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47476000&quot; title=&quot;Hormuz is not a minefield though. According to sources, ships are moving near the coast of Iran, according to other sources they are being charged $2M per passage. According to other sources only Yuan paid oil is allowed.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://domenic.me/windows-native-dev/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Windows native app development is a mess&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (domenic.me)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47475938&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;385 points · 373 comments · by domenicd&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer&amp;#39;s attempt to build a native utility reveals that Windows app development is a fragmented mess of abandoned frameworks, requiring extensive Win32 interop and costly code-signing. The author concludes that Microsoft&amp;#39;s inconsistent support for .NET and WinUI 3 makes web-based alternatives like Electron or Tauri more practical. &lt;a href=&quot;https://domenic.me/windows-native-dev/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Windows Native App Development Is a Mess    URL Source: https://domenic.me/windows-native-dev/    Published Time: 2026-03-22T00:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  I’m a Windows guy; I always have been. One of my first programming books was [Beginning Visual C++ 6](https://archive.org/details/beginningvisualc00hort/mode/2up), which crucially came with a trial version of Visual C++ that my ten-year-old self could install on my parents’ computer. I remember being on a family vacation when .NET 1.0…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While modern Microsoft frameworks like WinUI 3.0 are widely criticized as a &amp;#34;mess&amp;#34; to be avoided &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480056&quot; title=&quot;Again, unless you have existing Windows 8/10 applications that were written against WinRT, UAP or UWP[0], that make use of WinUI 2.0, forget about touching anything related to WinUI 3.0 or WinAppSDK, stay away from the marketing. Exception being the few APIs that have been introduced in Win32 that instead of COM, actually depend on WinRT like the new MIDI 2.0 or Windows ML. Keep using Win32, MFC (yes it is in a better state than WinUI 3.0 with C++), WinForms, WPF, if using Microsoft only…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, there is a strong consensus that the legacy Win32 API remains a premier choice for stability and unmatched backwards compatibility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47477098&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m an embedded programmer who occassionally needs to write various windows programs to interface with embedded devices (usually via serial port or usb), and I find it a breeze to write native gui programs in pure win32 and c++. Recently had to add a new feature to and old program that was last updated in the XP era and two things to note: 1. The program did not need to be updated to run on Vista, 7, 10 and 11, shit just kept working throughout the years. 2. I loaded the project into Visual…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481306&quot; title=&quot;I agree with all the comments here saying &amp;#39;stick with Win32&amp;#39; --- this is &amp;#39;a mess&amp;#39; that you can easily avoid. Speaking as a long-time Win32 programmer, the requirements for your app are doable in a few KB (yes, kilobytes --- my vague estimate is less than 8KB) standalone executable. This is how I arrived at that: Enumerating the machine’s displays and their bounds A few API calls. Probably a few hundred bytes. Placing borderless, titlebar-less, non-activating black windows Creating…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47479476&quot; title=&quot;Let me chime in and say that plain Win32 API is a perfectly viable option if you are using C++ (or another &amp;#39;OO&amp;#39; language) and if you are willing to sink a couple of weeks into writing your own MFC-like wrapper. Clearly this is not an option for those who are just starting up with Windows GUI work, but with little experience it is really a matter of 2-3 weeks of ground work and then you have full control over all nuances of the UI, yours to extend and mend as you wish. If there&amp;#39;s one thing that…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents highlight that Win32 allows for extremely lightweight, performant executables that can run for decades without modification, though critics note that migrating legacy code to 64-bit can be challenging due to fragmented documentation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47477098&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m an embedded programmer who occassionally needs to write various windows programs to interface with embedded devices (usually via serial port or usb), and I find it a breeze to write native gui programs in pure win32 and c++. Recently had to add a new feature to and old program that was last updated in the XP era and two things to note: 1. The program did not need to be updated to run on Vista, 7, 10 and 11, shit just kept working throughout the years. 2. I loaded the project into Visual…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481306&quot; title=&quot;I agree with all the comments here saying &amp;#39;stick with Win32&amp;#39; --- this is &amp;#39;a mess&amp;#39; that you can easily avoid. Speaking as a long-time Win32 programmer, the requirements for your app are doable in a few KB (yes, kilobytes --- my vague estimate is less than 8KB) standalone executable. This is how I arrived at that: Enumerating the machine’s displays and their bounds A few API calls. Probably a few hundred bytes. Placing borderless, titlebar-less, non-activating black windows Creating…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47477161&quot; title=&quot;The one big challenge I&amp;#39;ve had with big legacy Win32/C++ codebases is migrating it fully from 32bit to 64bit. Loads of know-how and docs for complex GUI controls and structs are lost to time, or really fragmented. Other than that, yeah it really does all just work once you&amp;#39;re past that.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some developers prefer the modern web stack or game engines like Unity for ease of use &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47477120&quot; title=&quot;I wonder if Unity (the game engine) actually has a sneaky potential here. It’s cross platform, fast, and maybe just maybe less bloated than carrying around an entire browser like Electron?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47476972&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; And from what I can tell, neither are most developers. The Hacker News commentariat loves to bemoan the death of native apps. But given what a mess the Windows app platform is, I’ll pick the web stack any day, with Electron or Tauri to bridge down to the relevant Win32 APIs for OS integration. Well yes as a user I prefer native apps for their performance. It&amp;#39;s clearly a mess to develop native apps as the article shows. But as a user I don&amp;#39;t see that problem. I do see ever worsening apps…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that C++ remains the &amp;#34;battle-tested&amp;#34; standard for native GUIs, especially when paired with frameworks like Qt or custom wrappers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47479476&quot; title=&quot;Let me chime in and say that plain Win32 API is a perfectly viable option if you are using C++ (or another &amp;#39;OO&amp;#39; language) and if you are willing to sink a couple of weeks into writing your own MFC-like wrapper. Clearly this is not an option for those who are just starting up with Windows GUI work, but with little experience it is really a matter of 2-3 weeks of ground work and then you have full control over all nuances of the UI, yours to extend and mend as you wish. If there&amp;#39;s one thing that…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47479964&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; But, in 2026, writing a greenfield application in a memory-unsafe language like C++ is a crime. I disagree, the GUI layer is far from behind a safety critical component, and C++ is a battle-tested choice for everything from GUI, videos games, to industrial applications. If C++ is safe enough to control airplanes and nuclear reactors when used well, it is certainly safe enough for something as trivial a GUI. The article also fails to mention frameworks like Qt, arguably the best way to write…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bramcohen.com/p/manyana&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The future of version control&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bramcohen.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47478401&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;481 points · 268 comments · by c17r&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bram Cohen has released Manyana, a demo project that uses Conflict-Free Replicated Data Types (CRDTs) to ensure version control merges never fail while providing more informative, structural conflict markers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bramcohen.com/p/manyana&quot; title=&quot;Title: Manyana    URL Source: https://bramcohen.com/p/manyana    Published Time: 2026-03-22T14:48:42+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Manyana - by Bram Cohen - Bram’s Thoughts    [![Image 1: Bram’s Thoughts](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!S_kK!,w_40,h_40,c_fill,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F30b79ed6-8654-446e-ad5c-adf2389a0558_570x570.png)](https://bramcohen.com/)    # [Bram’s…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether the limitations of Git&amp;#39;s merge process are a fundamental flaw of its data structure or merely a UI issue that can be solved with better tools like `p4merge` or the `diff3` configuration &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47479687&quot; title=&quot;The thing about how merges are presented seems orthogonal to how to represent history. I also hate the default in git, but that is why I just use p4merge as a merge tool and get a proper 4-pane merge tool (left, right, common base, merged result) which shows everything needed to figure out why there is a conflict and how to resolve it. I don&amp;#39;t understand why you need to switch out the VCS to fix that issue.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480351&quot; title=&quot;Even if you don’t use p4merge, you can set Git’s merge.conflictStyle config to &amp;#39;diff3&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;zdiff3&amp;#39; ( https://git-scm.com/docs/git-config#Documentation/git-config... ). If you do that, Git’s conflict markers show the base version as well: &amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; left    ||||||| base    def calculate(x):        a = x * 2        b = a + 1        return b    =======    def calculate(x):        a = x * 2        logger.debug(f&amp;#39;a={a}&amp;#39;)        b = a + 1        return b    &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; right With this configuration, a developer reading…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that Conflict-Free Replicated Data Types (CRDTs) are the future of version control, critics contend that manual conflicts are essential for resolving semantic contradictions that automated systems might otherwise turn into &amp;#34;garbage code&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47479374&quot; title=&quot;Is it a good thing to have merges that never fail? Often a merge failure indicates a semantic conflict, not just &amp;#39;two changes in the same place&amp;#39;. You want to be aware of and forced to manually deal with such cases. I assume the proposed system addresses it somehow but I don&amp;#39;t see it in my quick read of this.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480815&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t really get the upside of focus on CRDTs. The semantic problem with conflicts exists either way. You get a consistent outcome and a slightly better description of the conflict, but in a way that possibly interleaves changes, which I don&amp;#39;t think is an improvement at all. I am completely rebase-pilled. I believe merge commits should be avoided at all costs, every commit should be a fast forward commit, and a unit of work that can be rolled back in isolation. And also all commits should be…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482035&quot; title=&quot;You can&amp;#39;t use CRDTs for version control, having conflicts is the whole point of version control. Sometimes two developers will make changes that fundamentally tries to change the code in two different ways, a merge conflict then leaves it up to the developer who is merging/rebasing to make a choice about the semantics of the program they want to keep. A CRDT would just produce garbage code, its fundamentally the wrong solution. If you want better developer UX for merge conflicts then there are…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant frustration with Git’s &amp;#34;ours/theirs&amp;#34; terminology, which many veteran developers still find unintuitive and confusing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480531&quot; title=&quot;That still have an issue with the vocabulary. Things like &amp;#39;theirs/our&amp;#39; is still out of touch but it&amp;#39;s already better than a loose spatial analogy on some representation of the DAG. Something like base, that is &amp;#39;common base&amp;#39;, looks far more apt to my mind. In the same vein, endogenous/exogenous would be far more precise, or at least aligned with the concern at stake. Maybe &amp;#39;local/alien&amp;#39; might be a less pompous vocabulary to convey the same idea.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480671&quot; title=&quot;After 15 years i still cant remember which is which. I get annoyed every time. Maybe I should invest 15 minutes finally to remember properly&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480836&quot; title=&quot;Let’s see if I get this wrong after 25 years of git: ours means what is in my local codebase. theirs means what is being merged into my local codebase. I find it best to avoid merge conflicts than to try to resolve them. Strategies that keep branches short lived and frequently merging main into them helps a lot.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Finally, commenters highlight existing alternatives like Pijul and Jujutsu, noting that Pijul already implements many of these theoretical concepts despite lower mainstream visibility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47479347&quot; title=&quot;The key insight in the third sentence? &amp;gt; ... CRDTs for version control, which is long overdue but hasn’t happened yet Pijul happened and it has hundreds - perhaps thousands - of hours of real expert developer&amp;#39;s toil put in it. Not that Bram is not one of those, but the post reads like you all know what.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480815&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t really get the upside of focus on CRDTs. The semantic problem with conflicts exists either way. You get a consistent outcome and a slightly better description of the conflict, but in a way that possibly interleaves changes, which I don&amp;#39;t think is an improvement at all. I am completely rebase-pilled. I believe merge commits should be avoided at all costs, every commit should be a fast forward commit, and a unit of work that can be rolled back in isolation. And also all commits should be…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47479499&quot; title=&quot;I hadn&amp;#39;t heard of Pijul. My first search took me to https://github.com/8l/pijul which hasn&amp;#39;t been updated in 11 years, but it turns out that&amp;#39;s misleading and the official repo at https://nest.pijul.com/pijul/pijul had a commit last month. ... and of course it is, because Pijul uses Pijul for development, not Git and GitHub!&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://43081j.com/2026/03/three-pillars-of-javascript-bloat&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The three pillars of JavaScript bloat&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (43081j.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47473718&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;458 points · 267 comments · by onlyspaceghost&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;JavaScript dependency bloat is driven by outdated runtime support for legacy engines, atomic architectures that over-package tiny code snippets, and &amp;#34;ponyfills&amp;#34; that remain in use long after native browser support exists, though modern tools like Knip and the e18e CLI can help developers identify and remove these redundancies. &lt;a href=&quot;https://43081j.com/2026/03/three-pillars-of-javascript-bloat&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Three Pillars of JavaScript Bloat    URL Source: https://43081j.com/2026/03/three-pillars-of-javascript-bloat    Published Time: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 17:45:05 GMT    Markdown Content:  # The Three Pillars of JavaScript Bloat    # [James Garbutt](https://43081j.com/)    Software engineer &amp;amp; open source guy.    [](https://bsky.app/profile/43081j.com)[](https://github.com/43081j)    # The Three Pillars of JavaScript Bloat    March 12, 2026    [Edit…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary drivers of JavaScript bloat are identified as &amp;#34;hidden tech debt&amp;#34; from transpiling to ancient browser targets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47474070&quot; title=&quot;A lot of this basically reads to me like hidden tech debt: people aren&amp;#39;t updating their compilation targets to ESx, people aren&amp;#39;t updating their packages, package authors aren&amp;#39;t updating their implementations, etc. Ancient browser support is a thing, but ES5 has been supported everywhere for like 13 years now (as per https://caniuse.com/es5 ).&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47474127&quot; title=&quot;The desire to keep things compatible with even ES6, let alone ES5 and before, is utterly bizarre to me. Then you see folks who unironically want to maintain compatibility with node 0.4, in 2025, and realize it could be way worse.... Ironically, what often happens is that developers configure Babel to transpile their code to some ancient version, the output is bloated (and slower to execute, since passes like regenerator have a lot of overhead), and then the website doesn&amp;#39;t even work on the…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt; and a culture that prioritizes ease of addition over elegant subtraction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47474373&quot; title=&quot;Great article, but I think these are all marginal. The main cause of bloat is not polyfills or atomic packages. The cause of bloat is bloat! I love this quote by Antoine de Saint-Exupéry (author of the Little Prince): &amp;#39;Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing left to add, but nothing to take away.&amp;#39; Most software is not written like that. It&amp;#39;s not asking &amp;#39;how can we make this more elegant?&amp;#39; It&amp;#39;s asking &amp;#39;what&amp;#39;s the easiest way to add more stuff?&amp;#39; The answer is `npm i more-stuff`.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47474551&quot; title=&quot;Cf. Vonnegut&amp;#39;s rule #4 of good writing: &amp;gt; Every sentence must do one of two things—reveal character or advance the action. Or Quintilian&amp;#39;s praise of Demosthenes and Cicero: &amp;#39;To Demosthenes nothing can be added, but from Cicero nothing can be taken away.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters specifically criticize &amp;#34;atomic architecture,&amp;#34; where developers rely on trivial, single-purpose packages for tasks like checking if a number is odd, often to inflate download metrics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47474565&quot; title=&quot;I think on the first point, we have to start calling out authors of packages  which (IMO) have built out these deptrees to their own subpackages basically entirely for the purpose of getting high download counts on their github account Like seriously... at 50 million downloads maybe you should vendor some shit in. Packages like this which have _7 lines of code_ should not exist! The metadata of the lockfile is bigger than the minified version of this code! At one point in the past like 5% of…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47475305&quot; title=&quot;The most frustrating thing with the &amp;#39;Atomic architecture&amp;#39; bit with tiny packages is how obviously stupid it is. Any borderline sane person should look at isOdd/isEven and see that it&amp;#39;s an awful idea Instead they&amp;#39;ve elevated it to a cultural pillar and think they&amp;#39;ve come up with a great innovation. It&amp;#39;s like talking to antivaxers&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that JavaScript&amp;#39;s lack of a robust standard library forced this dependency-heavy ecosystem &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47475495&quot; title=&quot;Well-written article, manages not to sound rant-y while describing the problem well. I feel like part of the blame for the situation is that JavaScript has always lacked a standard library which contains the &amp;#39;atomic architecture&amp;#39; style packages. (A standard library wouldn&amp;#39;t solve everything, of course.)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that modern JS and CSS are now powerful enough to support &amp;#34;dependency-free&amp;#34; development that scales better than bloated frameworks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47474386&quot; title=&quot;I really think writing dependency-free JavaScript is the way to go nowadays. The standard library in JS/CSS is great. So are static analysis (TypeScript can check JSDoc), imports (ES modules), UI (web components), etc. People keep telling me the approach I am taking won&amp;#39;t scale or will be hard to maintain, yet my experience has been that things stay simple and easy to change in a way I haven&amp;#39;t experienced in dependency-heavy projects.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47476242&quot; title=&quot;What functionality is still missing from the JS standard library? The JS standard library seems massive these days. Edit: Removed a reference to node and bun.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47474094&quot; title=&quot;The newer version is often even more bloated. This whole article just reinforces my opinion of &amp;#39;WTF is wrong with JS developers&amp;#39; in general: a lot of mostly mindless trendchasing and reinventing wheels by making them square. Meanwhile, I look back at what was possible 2 decades ago with very little JS and see just how far things have degraded.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stuartbreckenridge.net/2026-03-19-pc-gamer-recommends-rss-readers-in-a-37mb-article/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;PC Gamer recommends RSS readers in a 37mb article that just keeps downloading&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (stuartbreckenridge.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480507&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;470 points · 233 comments · by JumpCrisscross&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A PC Gamer article promoting RSS readers was criticized for its excessive 37MB initial page size and for downloading nearly half a gigabyte of ads within five minutes of loading. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stuartbreckenridge.net/2026-03-19-pc-gamer-recommends-rss-readers-in-a-37mb-article/&quot; title=&quot;Title: PC Gamer Recommends RSS Readers in a 37MB Article That Just Keeps Downloading — Stuart Breckenridge    URL Source: https://stuartbreckenridge.net/2026-03-19-pc-gamer-recommends-rss-readers-in-a-37mb-article/    Markdown Content:  There’s not much worth quoting in this [PC Gamer article](https://www.pcgamer.com/software/kill-the-algorithm-in-your-head-lets-set-up-rss-readers-and-get-news-we-actually-want-in-2026/) but I do want to draw your attention to three things.    First, what you see when…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights the irony of a PC Gamer article about RSS readers consuming 37MB initially and up to 500MB in minutes due to background ads and autoplaying videos &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481582&quot; title=&quot;The title buried the lede. &amp;gt; In the five minutes since I started writing this post the website has downloaded almost half a gigabyte of new ads. I’m guessing this is due to autoplaying videos. *500 MB* in 5 minutes. 37 MB is petite compared to that.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482577&quot; title=&quot;Downloading 500 MB in 5 minutes in the background of a random article is really disrespectful to readers on low-end devices or metered data plans (and these two groups are often the same people!). What a waste of ressources.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Users noted that this &amp;#34;bloat&amp;#34; is equivalent to downloading multiple copies of Windows 95 for a single article, which effectively renders low-end devices and metered data plans useless &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482577&quot; title=&quot;Downloading 500 MB in 5 minutes in the background of a random article is really disrespectful to readers on low-end devices or metered data plans (and these two groups are often the same people!). What a waste of ressources.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482276&quot; title=&quot;To use a good point of reference that I&amp;#39;ve seen others also start using lately, an installation of Windows 95 is roughly 40MB, so in loading that page you&amp;#39;ve downloaded approximately one Windows 95 installation. Then another 10+ times with the 500MB more that came after.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that throttled 2G speeds are sufficient for basic tasks like email, others contend that modern web architecture and &amp;#34;tech bubble&amp;#34; design cause essential processes to time out, turning these devices into &amp;#34;ewaste&amp;#34; for the marginalized populations who rely on them &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482645&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve worked with a lot of people at the bottom end of society in the USA. They are given government provided phones they can use so they have access to Google Maps, email, job search apps etc. These phones come with 3GB of regular data per month. After that they drop down to 2G speed, but not in a way that will allow anything to actually load. Three days into the month these phones are just ewaste.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482785&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Three days into the month these phones are just ewaste. If someone needs a phone like this for email and job searching and has no other option, 2G speeds will work. It’s not e-waste for the intended purpose. It would be great if they got higher days caps, though, because let’s be realistic in acknowledging that they’re not only going to use it for Google Maps, email, and job search apps.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47483124&quot; title=&quot;If someone needs a phone like this for email and job searching and has no other option, 2G speeds will work. It’s not e-waste for the intended purpose. Guess how I know you&amp;#39;ve never actually tried this. Part of my job is testing the web sites I build in the terrible real-world conditions where our customers are. Places like machine rooms, deep basements, and small towns with only municipal or small-carrier 3G cell service. (In spite of what HN believes, there are plenty of places in America…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, readers expressed frustration that even paid media outlets rarely offer full-text RSS feeds, forcing users to navigate these resource-heavy, ad-laden pages [&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://radar.cloudflare.com/domains/domain/archive.today&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cloudflare flags archive.today as &amp;quot;C&amp;amp;C/Botnet&amp;quot;; no longer resolves via 1.1.1.2&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (radar.cloudflare.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47474255&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;381 points · 277 comments · by winkelmann&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudflare has flagged the web archiving site archive.today as a &amp;#34;C&amp;amp;C/Botnet&amp;#34; threat, preventing the domain from resolving for users of Cloudflare’s 1.1.1.2 security-focused DNS service. &lt;a href=&quot;https://radar.cloudflare.com/domains/domain/archive.today&quot; title=&quot;Title: Just a moment...    URL Source: https://radar.cloudflare.com/domains/domain/archive.today    Warning: Target URL returned error 403: Forbidden  Warning: This page maybe requiring CAPTCHA, please make sure you are authorized to access this page.    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: Icon for radar.cloudflare.com](https://radar.cloudflare.com/favicon.ico)    ## radar.cloudflare.com    ## Performing security verification    This website uses a security service to protect against malicious bots. This page is…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudflare’s 1.1.1.2 DNS service has flagged archive.today as &amp;#34;C&amp;amp;C/Botnet&amp;#34; due to an ongoing attack where the archival site serves a JavaScript snippet that forces users to spam a specific blog, gyrovague.com, with search queries &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47474777&quot; title=&quot;Archive.today&amp;#39;s attack on https://gyrovague.com is still on-going btw. It started just over two months ago. Some IPs get through normally but for example finnish residential IPs get stuck on endless captchas. The JS snippet that starts spamming gyrovague appears after solving the first captcha.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47475839&quot; title=&quot;1.1.1.2 is their malware-blocking DNS, and 1.1.1.3 is their parental-controls DNS. If you want an unfiltered DNS, use 1.1.1.1 - which resolves archive.today just fine, although archive.today itself refuses to work on Cloudlfare DNS.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47474913&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not a web developer, but I&amp;#39;ve picked up some bits of knowledge here and there, mostly from troubleshooting issues I encounter while using websites. I know there are a number of headers used to control cross-site access to websites, and the linked blog post shows archive.today&amp;#39;s denial-of-service script sending random queries to the site&amp;#39;s search function. Shouldn&amp;#39;t there be a way to prevent those from running when they&amp;#39;re requested from within a third-party site?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. This conflict reportedly stems from the blog owner’s attempt to dox the anonymous operator of archive.today, leading to a debate over whether the archival service&amp;#39;s retaliatory DDoS is more or less &amp;#34;nasty&amp;#34; than the initial privacy breach &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47475454&quot; title=&quot;Jani Patokallio who runs gyrovague.com published a blog post attempting to dox the owner of archive.today. Jani justifies his doxing as follows &amp;#39;I found it curious that we know so little about this widely-used service, so I dug into it&amp;#39; [1] Archive.today on the other hand is a charitable archival project offered to the public for free. The operator of Archive.today risks significant legal liability, but still offers this service for free. [1]:…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47475017&quot; title=&quot;The linked blog contains a story about who funds archive today and they presumably don’t like being exposed.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue the malware classification is accurate and the site should no longer be trusted, others suggest the service is under external pressure from FBI investigations and fictitious legal allegations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47475319&quot; title=&quot;I think there are two angles to look at this. Yes, there’s the attack on the weblog. But there’s also pressure on archive.today, e.g. an FBI investigation [1] and some entity using fictitious CSAM allegations [2]. [1]: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/11/fbi-subpoena-tri... [2]: https://adguard-dns.io/en/blog/archive-today-adguard-dns-blo...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47474772&quot; title=&quot;Why? It’s accurate and if the owner has chosen to do this for months now, why should we ever trust they won’t again? Nobody should ever use that site and every optional filter should block them.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stevekrouse.com/precision&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Reports of code&amp;#39;s death are greatly exaggerated&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (stevekrouse.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47476315&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;343 points · 257 comments · by stevekrouse&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While AI-driven &amp;#34;vibe coding&amp;#34; simplifies software creation, the author argues that code remains essential for mastering complexity through precise abstraction and preventing &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; as applications scale. Rather than killing programming, AI and AGI will serve as tools to develop more powerful, elegant, and sophisticated code structures. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stevekrouse.com/precision&quot; title=&quot;Title: Reports of code&amp;#39;s death are greatly exaggerated    URL Source: https://stevekrouse.com/precision    Markdown Content:  # Reports of code&amp;#39;s death are greatly exaggerated    [← Steve Krouse](https://stevekrouse.com/)[view source](https://stevekrouse.com/source)    # [Reports of code&amp;#39;s death are greatly exaggerated](https://stevekrouse.com/precision#reports-of-codes-death-are-greatly-exaggerated)    March, 21 2026    [A sufficiently detailed spec is…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether AI can truly innovate or if it merely synthesizes existing human knowledge, with critics like Chris Lattner noting that AI-generated compilers lack the &amp;#34;critical thinking&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;rebellion&amp;#34; necessary to advance the state of the art &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480731&quot; title=&quot;Chris Lattner, inventor of the Swift programming language recently took a look at a compiler entirely written by Claude AI. Lattner found nothing innovative in the code generated by AI [1]. And this is why humans will be needed to advance the state of the art. AI tends to accept conventional wisdom. Because of this, it struggles with genuine critical thinking and cannot independently advance the state of the art. AI systems are trained on vast bodies of human work and generate answers near the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481610&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Chris Lattner, inventor of the Swift programming language recently took a look at a compiler entirely written by Claude AI. Lattner found nothing innovative in the code generated by AI [1]. Well, of course. Despite people applying the label of AI to them, LLMs don&amp;#39;t have a shred of intelligence. That is inherent to how they work. They don&amp;#39;t understand, only synthesize from the data they were trained on.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that AI is a conformist trapped by its training data, others suggest that most human work is also derivative and that AI could eventually handle the &amp;#34;robot&amp;#39;s job&amp;#34; of refactoring the 50 years of code already written &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481666&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; don&amp;#39;t have a shred of intelligence. ... They don&amp;#39;t understand, only synthesize from the data they were trained on. Couldn&amp;#39;t you say that about 99% of humans too?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480429&quot; title=&quot;In a chat bot coding world, how do we ever progress to new technologies? Funny, I&amp;#39;d say the same thing about traditional programming. Someone from K&amp;amp;R&amp;#39;s group at Bell Labs, straight out of 1972, would have no problem recognizing my day-to-day workflow.  I fire up a text editor, edit some C code, compile it, and run it.  Lather, rinse, repeat, all by hand. That&amp;#39;s not OK.  That&amp;#39;s not the way this industry was ever supposed to evolve, doing the same old things the same old way for 50+ years.  It&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant point of contention is whether the future of programming involves a shift in abstraction—where humans write specs in English rather than code—or if the inherent ambiguity of natural language will always necessitate the precision of traditional coding &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480015&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know that people are saying code is dead (or at least the ones who have even a vague understanding of AI&amp;#39;s role) - more that humans are moving up a level of abstraction in their inputs. Rather than writing code, they can write specs in English and have AI write the code, much in the same way that humans moved from writing assembly to writing higher-level code. But of course writing code directly will always maintain the benefit of specificity. If you want to write instructions to a…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://composio.dev/content/openclaw-security-and-vulnerabilities&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OpenClaw is a security nightmare dressed up as a daydream&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (composio.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47479962&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;321 points · 222 comments · by fs_software&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenClaw, a popular open-source AI assistant, faces significant security risks including prompt injection, malware-infected &amp;#34;skills,&amp;#34; and exposed infrastructure. Experts recommend using containerized environments and restricted permissions to mitigate these vulnerabilities, while new alternatives like TrustClaw aim to provide managed authentication and sandboxed code execution. &lt;a href=&quot;https://composio.dev/content/openclaw-security-and-vulnerabilities&quot; title=&quot;Title: OpenClaw is a Security Nightmare Dressed Up as a Daydream | Composio    URL Source: https://composio.dev/content/openclaw-security-and-vulnerabilities    Markdown Content:  # OpenClaw is a Security Nightmare Dressed Up as a Daydream | Composio    [![Image 1: Composio](https://composio.dev/logos/composio-full-white.svg)![Image 2: Composio](https://composio.dev/logos/composio-full-black.svg)](https://composio.dev/)    *   [COMPOSIO FOR…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the &amp;#34;lethal trifecta&amp;#34; of security risks inherent in giving AI agents access to private data and credentials, with some arguing that the tool&amp;#39;s utility makes these risks unavoidable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481214&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Separate Accounts for your OpenClaw &amp;gt; As I have mentioned, treat OpenClaw as a separate entity. So, give it its own Gmail account, Calendar, and every integration possible. And teach it to access its own email and other accounts. In addition, create a separate 1Password account to store credentials. It’s akin to having a personal assistant with a separate identity, rather than an automation tool. The whole point of OpenClaw is to run AI actions with your own private data, your own Gmail, your…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481017&quot; title=&quot;Yes, yes it is. And it&amp;#39;s amaaaazing. We&amp;#39;re going to have lots of sharp edges getting stuff like this secured, but it is not going to go away. Too useful.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that common use cases like booking flights are &amp;#34;visionless&amp;#34; productivity theater or too high-stakes for automation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481183&quot; title=&quot;Responding to the tweet quoted in the article: why are the examples given of futuristic capabilities always so visionless - it&amp;#39;s always booking a flight or scheduling a meeting. Doing this manually is already pretty trivial, it&amp;#39;s more productivity theatre than genuinely life-changing. There are real, impressive examples of the power of agentic flows out there. Can we up the quality of our examples just a bit?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482081&quot; title=&quot;Booking a flight is the kind of thing I want to dedicate my full attention to. It&amp;#39;s expensive, and the timing and details matter a lot. I&amp;#39;m happy for the voice assistant to add stuff to my grocery list, though. The consequences are not serious if it screws up a letter or something.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481349&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; why are the examples given of futuristic capabilities always so visionless - it&amp;#39;s always booking a flight or scheduling a meeting. This AI wave is filled with &amp;#39;ideas guys/gals&amp;#39; who thought they had an amazing awesome idea and if only they knew how to program they could make a best-selling billion dollar idea, being confronted with the reality that their ideas are really uninteresting as well. They&amp;#39;re still happy to write blog posts about how their bleeding-edge Claw setup sends them a push…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, while proponents highlight the value of agents for managing complex travel logistics or generating comprehensive daily briefings from fragmented data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481332&quot; title=&quot;Not using OpenClaw - but I have a limited agent running that currently does a few things well. Morning Briefing:    - it reads all my new email (multiple accounts and contexts), calendars (same accounts and contexts), slack (and other chat) messages (multiple slacks, matrix, discord, and so on), the weather reports, my open/closed recent to dos in a shared list across all my devices, my latest journal/log entries of things done. Has access for cross referencing to my &amp;#39;people files&amp;#39; to get…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482716&quot; title=&quot;Apparently I&amp;#39;m the only one here who finds it to be one of the worst things I ever have to do, I hate managing the combinatorial tab explosion by hand. Compounded by the adversarial nature of the price-setting algorithms that jack up the price on you if you show too much interest by researching too intensively. Just booked a flight for our family in two parts, and booking for one set of us made the price for the second set of us with a slightly different itinerary massively more expensive,…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite security concerns, some users believe the desire for a &amp;#34;literal secretary&amp;#34; will drive continued adoption, potentially solving currently &amp;#34;unsolvable&amp;#34; safety problems over time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481506&quot; title=&quot;I think some folks want a legitmate personal assistant/secretary like ceo&amp;#39;s and wealthy people have but ai. I think that&amp;#39;s a good goal. Modern cells and pdas kinda fell short of &amp;#39;your own literal secretary&amp;#39; and I think people want that. Still we should continue pushing the boundaries beyond that.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481235&quot; title=&quot;I wonder how many inherently unsolvable problems have been fixed before.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481043&quot; title=&quot;I would like a personal assistant on my phone that, based on my usual routine and my exact position, can tell me (for example) which bus will get me home the quickest off the ferry, whether the bridge is clogged with traffic, do I need an umbrella? what&amp;#39;s probably missing from my fridge, time to top up transit pass, did I tap in? etc etc. These things would appear on my lock screen when I most probably need to know them. No email stuff, no booking things, no security problems.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.projectnomad.us&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Project Nomad – Knowledge That Never Goes Offline&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (projectnomad.us)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47476821&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;402 points · 132 comments · by jensgk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Project NOMAD is a free, open-source server platform that allows users to host Wikipedia, AI language models, maps, and educational tools on their own hardware for completely offline use. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.projectnomad.us&quot; title=&quot;Title: Project NOMAD - Knowledge That Never Goes Offline    URL Source: https://www.projectnomad.us/    Markdown Content:  # Project NOMAD - Offline Knowledge &amp;amp; AI Server    [![Image 1: Project NOMAD](https://www.projectnomad.us/_next/image?url=%2Flogo.png&amp;amp;w=96&amp;amp;q=75&amp;amp;dpl=dpl_7DYhGYearAJye9N5kynNyYg7zRtF)Project NOMAD](https://www.projectnomad.us/)    [Features](https://www.projectnomad.us/#features)[Use…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users find the &amp;#34;doomsday&amp;#34; framing of Project Nomad annoying &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47478750&quot; title=&quot;I like the idea of an LLM that acts as a public knowledge base. But that doomsday framing on the site is pretty annoying.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, many argue that offline knowledge is a practical safeguard against government censorship, internet outages, or regional instability rather than just extreme &amp;#34;prepping&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481051&quot; title=&quot;Normally I cringe at doomsday preppers but given how many dictators out there love the idea to cut their country off Internet whenever anything starts going not in their favor, I imagine a lot of people may find this useful. I wouldn’t want to lose access to knowledge how to fix a sink or which medication is better, just because the local kingface currently feels that free exchange of opinions about him threatens his kingship.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482190&quot; title=&quot;I am not a prepper, but I always found immediate dismissal of their stance odd. If you see clouds on the horizon, reasonable people start preparing. Some preparations take longer than others so longer than others. And this does not account for the fact that one the steady lull ( in US and most of Europe ) of the past 70 or so years is not the norm in our world.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481498&quot; title=&quot;I come from a time when internet connectivity was not permanent.   It was only available a few times per day when you connected via the phone line. My first ISP gave me an allowance of 20 hours of internet per month.  You would dial-up, check the news, check your email, read a page or two, download what you had to download, and then disconnect.   The internet was very slow by today&amp;#39;s standards, and the connection would get lost very often.  It was during that time when it was drilled into my head…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Commentators highlight existing alternatives like &amp;#34;Internet-in-a-Box,&amp;#34; physical encyclopedias, and historical precedents like the 1950s US Civil Defense microfilms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480982&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s a company which sells something like this, as &amp;#39;Prepper Disk&amp;#39;.[1] In the 1950s, US Civil Defense had a set of microfilms on how to rebuild society. These were packaged with a sunlight reader and stored in larger fallout shelters. Someone should find one of those. [1] https://www.prepperdisk.com/&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482356&quot; title=&quot;Stuff like this is why I keep a small library at my house. Full encyclopedia set, Merck Manual, home repair book, etc. May never use them, but I like having them. Facebook ads even successfully targeted me for that “how to rebuild all of civilization” book. :)&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47477530&quot; title=&quot;See also: https://internet-in-a-box.org/ https://wrolpi.org/&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, skeptics question the utility of running power-hungry LLMs during a true catastrophe and distinguish between reasonable preparation and the unrealistic &amp;#34;disaster movie&amp;#34; tropes often associated with preppers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482631&quot; title=&quot;Well usually when people refer to someone as a prepper its the specific type of person that is buying hundreds of guns, tons of dehydrated meals but still living on city water - like they&amp;#39;re preparing for a disaster movie but not anything real.  Specifically the idea that you would be able to stay in place, with all your hoarded disaster crap, during the end of the world is kind of funny.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47479234&quot; title=&quot;In a world where this is useful, you aren&amp;#39;t going to be spending your precious battery on running an LLM...&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2026/03/bored-of-eating-your-own-dogfood-try-smelling-your-own-farts/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bored of eating your own dogfood? Try smelling your own farts&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (shkspr.mobi)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47477158&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;314 points · 191 comments · by ColinWright&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Terence Eden argues that companies should go beyond &amp;#34;dogfooding&amp;#34; by forcing leadership to experience their own flawed customer service journeys, such as navigating broken automated phone systems, to build genuine empathy for frustrated users. &lt;a href=&quot;https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2026/03/bored-of-eating-your-own-dogfood-try-smelling-your-own-farts/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Bored of eating your own dogfood? Try smelling your own farts!    URL Source: https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2026/03/bored-of-eating-your-own-dogfood-try-smelling-your-own-farts/    Published Time: 2026-03-22T12:34:07+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Bored of eating your own dogfood? Try smelling your own farts! – Terence Eden’s Blog  [![Image 1: Terence Eden. He has a beard and is smiling.](https://shkspr.mobi/apple-touch-icon.png)](https://shkspr.mobi/blog)[Terence Eden’s…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that corporate bureaucracy and KPI-driven cultures often incentivize leaders to prioritize &amp;#34;neatly prepared slide decks&amp;#34; over the reality of a broken user experience &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47477760&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; There&amp;#39;s an oft told story about Jeff Bezos pausing a meeting to call his own customer service number - and waiting over 10 minutes for an answer. One of my jobs was at a company that had developed at unhealthy amount of bureaucracy and politics. The product barely mattered to some because they were playing internal games of grandstanding, taking credit, and building their empires. In meetings where were supposed to be talking about product direction and priorities I would some times pull out…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47477959&quot; title=&quot;In my last role (engineering side) the VP of Product objected to me using the phrase &amp;#39;eating your own dogfood&amp;#39; because it was &amp;#39;gross&amp;#39; and she always interjected and replaced it with &amp;#39;drink your own champagne&amp;#39;. I countered (privately) that was a feature; it&amp;#39;s supposed to be a little unappetizing because you&amp;#39;re early, building empathy and getting a different perspective (to a dog, dog food is delicious!). I think the difference in perspective succinctly illustrates the schism between trying to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. This disconnect is frequently exacerbated by non-technical leadership who rely on middle managers to filter information, leading to &amp;#34;internal games&amp;#34; where fixing systemic issues is secondary to empire-building and budget acquisition &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47477937&quot; title=&quot;I work at a (government and extreme bureaucratic) organisation that builds apps used by field engineers. I found out SSO was broken. They had to login to every app using the same account. Twice per day because the token live was 4 hours &amp;#39;for security&amp;#39;. I found out it was because they published these apps as PWAs, making them more isolated than normal apps. I asked the product manager and he says the issue is &amp;#39;with Apple and Google&amp;#39;, not his department. When asked why he chose PWAs for the apps…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47478195&quot; title=&quot;At my org the CIO knows fuck all about computers. Great guy on a personal level but wouldn&amp;#39;t be able to quit Vim even if the lives of his 3 kids depended on it. He was put there because he was with the company for years before and he led other departments fine. Since he can&amp;#39;t evaluate anything IT related himself he relies on &amp;#39;advice&amp;#39; from the people beneath him who try to get the most budget for their departments by overstating how important they are. This layer beneath him is mostly product…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest that leaders should adopt military-style &amp;#34;tours&amp;#34; to gather unfiltered feedback from frontline workers, others contend that the &amp;#34;human condition&amp;#34; of prioritizing paychecks over product quality makes such dysfunction almost inevitable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47478100&quot; title=&quot;I legitimately don’t understand how companies get to this point, especially when the C-suite is full of founders (or maybe that’s worse?). I can understand how people want to make their bosses happy, and that can cascade into constant bullshitting, but at some point why doesn’t the CTO / CEO / etc. say “I’m going to go have conversations with the workers to get their perspective?” The U.S. Nuclear Navy, for all of its many flaws, gets this right. Generally at least once a year, the head of…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47478201&quot; title=&quot;The short of it is: no one gives a shit about anything but their own paycheck and getting off of work at 5pm. It&amp;#39;s the human condition (and also in part the companies&amp;#39; own fault since they stopped investing in employees) The people who give a shit and are passionate eventually join the other 99.9%, because it&amp;#39;s absolutely exhausting pulling the cart with 10 freeloaders on it who don&amp;#39;t care. I envy the people who can give a shit for longer than 2-3 years at any given job. I suppose being your…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/danveloper/flash-moe&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Flash-MoE: Running a 397B Parameter Model on a Laptop&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47476422&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;332 points · 112 comments · by mft_&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Flash-MoE is a custom C and Metal inference engine that enables a 397-billion parameter model to run on a 48GB RAM MacBook Pro. By streaming expert weights directly from the SSD, it achieves over 4 tokens per second with production-quality output. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/danveloper/flash-moe&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - danveloper/flash-moe: Running a big model on a small laptop    URL Source: https://github.com/danveloper/flash-moe    Markdown Content:  # GitHub - danveloper/flash-moe: Running a big model on a small laptop · GitHub    [Skip to content](https://github.com/danveloper/flash-moe#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [](https://github.com/)    [Sign in](https://github.com/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fdanveloper%2Fflash-moe)    Appearance settings    *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Flash-MoE enables running a 397B parameter model on a laptop via SSD streaming, users report significant trade-offs including potential SSD wear and quality degradation from 2-bit quantization, which can break basic formatting like JSON &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47476725&quot; title=&quot;The technical write up is great, but Mac users should not get too excited just yet on running 300B+ parameter models locally as the TPS isn&amp;#39;t that good. &amp;gt;...at 4.4+ tokens/second That is even when it is using 4-bit quantization and it is still at that speed. &amp;gt; The entire 209GB model streams from SSD through a custom Metal compute pipeline. This is my main problem. If I were to run this on a Mac SSD, 24/7 for heavy usage such as Openclaw, that is going to significantly reduce the lifetime of the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47477804&quot; title=&quot;The method in this link is already using a 2-bit quant. They also reduced the number of experts per token from 10 to 4 which is another layer of quality degradation. In my experience the 2-bit quants can produce output to short prompts that makes sense but they aren’t useful for doing work with longer sessions. This project couldn’t even get useful JSON out of the model because it can’t produce the right token for quotes: &amp;gt; *2-bit quantization produces \name\ instead of &amp;#39;name&amp;#39; in JSON output,…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Some argue that high-end Mac hardware remains a barrier for the average user &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481034&quot; title=&quot;To be honest, I&amp;#39;m getting tired of a &amp;#39;laptop&amp;#39; in every one of these clickbait titles turning out to be $3000 Macbook. Sure, it&amp;#39;s impressive to achieve this degree of the LLM compression, but I really don&amp;#39;t like that the title implies local LLM becomes a viable for an average person with the actual hardware being out of reach for 99%.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, though others have achieved superior performance (20 t/s) and high evaluation scores using 2.5 BPW quants on 128GB+ RAM systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47477552&quot; title=&quot;Note that this is not the only way to run Qwen 3.5 397B on consumer devices, there are excellent ~2.5 BPW quants available that make it viable for 128G devices. I&amp;#39;ve had great success (~20 t/s) running it on a M1 Ultra with room for 256k context. Here are some lm-evaluation-harness results I ran against it: mmlu: 87.86%        gpqa diamond: 82.32%        gsm8k: 86.43%        ifeval: 75.90% More details of my experience: - https://huggingface.co/ubergarm/Qwen3.5-397B-A17B-GGUF/discu... -…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47478015&quot; title=&quot;I can&amp;#39;t say anything about the OP method, but I already tested the smol-IQ2_XS quant (which has 2.46 BPW) with the pi harness. I did not do a very long session because token generation and prompt processing gets very slow, but I think I worked for up to ~70k context and it maintained a lot of coherence in the session. IIRC the GPQA diamond is supposed to exercise long chains of thought and it scored exceptionally well with 82% (the original BF16 official number is 88%:…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite speed limitations, the project is praised for its technical execution and for making frontier-class models viable for offline inference on consumer-grade hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47477552&quot; title=&quot;Note that this is not the only way to run Qwen 3.5 397B on consumer devices, there are excellent ~2.5 BPW quants available that make it viable for 128G devices. I&amp;#39;ve had great success (~20 t/s) running it on a M1 Ultra with room for 256k context. Here are some lm-evaluation-harness results I ran against it: mmlu: 87.86%        gpqa diamond: 82.32%        gsm8k: 86.43%        ifeval: 75.90% More details of my experience: - https://huggingface.co/ubergarm/Qwen3.5-397B-A17B-GGUF/discu... -…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47476725&quot; title=&quot;The technical write up is great, but Mac users should not get too excited just yet on running 300B+ parameter models locally as the TPS isn&amp;#39;t that good. &amp;gt;...at 4.4+ tokens/second That is even when it is using 4-bit quantization and it is still at that speed. &amp;gt; The entire 209GB model streams from SSD through a custom Metal compute pipeline. This is my main problem. If I were to run this on a Mac SSD, 24/7 for heavy usage such as Openclaw, that is going to significantly reduce the lifetime of the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47476728&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m getting 6.55t/s using the Qwen3.5-397B-A17B-4bit model with the command:   ./infer --prompt &amp;#39;Explain quantum computing&amp;#39; --tokens 100 MacBook Pro M5 Pro (64GB RAM)&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birkey.co/2026-03-22-why-i-love-nixos.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why I love NixOS&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (birkey.co)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47479751&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;264 points · 170 comments · by birkey&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author praises NixOS for its deterministic, declarative approach to system management, which enables reproducible configurations, safe experimentation through isolated shells, and seamless integration with AI coding agents without polluting the base operating system. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birkey.co/2026-03-22-why-i-love-nixos.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Why I love NixOS    URL Source: https://www.birkey.co/2026-03-22-why-i-love-nixos.html    Published Time: Sun, 22 Mar 2026 17:13:51 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Why I love NixOS    [**BIRKEY CONSULTING**](https://www.birkey.co/index.html)    * * *    [ABOUT](https://github.com/oneness)[RSS](https://www.birkey.co/rss.xml)[ARCHIVE](https://www.birkey.co/archive.html)    22 Mar 2026    # [Why I love NixOS](https://www.birkey.co/2026-03-22-why-i-love-nixos.html)    What I love about NixOS has less to do with…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NixOS is praised for its declarative, reproducible nature, which users compare to the necessity of Git for version control &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480760&quot; title=&quot;I switched over to Nix about a year ago. I was a Windows user before that for 30 years and tried Linux a couple of times, but it never stuck. Now I know I will never touch Windows again. With NixOS I&amp;#39;ve finally found a system that actually works for me — and the full OS configuration is in a repo. My god, I love it so much.  Sometimes I even prefer nix-shells over uv for quick one-off Python scripts.  I cannot sufficiently convey how absolutely barbaric everything else feels in comparison. Not…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480828&quot; title=&quot;nix &amp;amp; nixos are by far the worst way to manage system configuration, except for any other way that&amp;#39;s been tried. imagine if there was something with declarative system configuration _not_ written in an insane undebuggable recursive nightmare of a language/stdlib? oh well, I&amp;#39;ll keep using it, because what other options are there?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While critics argue the Nix language is an &amp;#34;undebuggable nightmare&amp;#34; with fragmented documentation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480472&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d love NixOS more if they had any decent documentation. Everything seems scattered around a dozen forums, a hundred old blog posts, and a thousand issues of &amp;#39;this work on my machine (3 releases ago)&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480828&quot; title=&quot;nix &amp;amp; nixos are by far the worst way to manage system configuration, except for any other way that&amp;#39;s been tried. imagine if there was something with declarative system configuration _not_ written in an insane undebuggable recursive nightmare of a language/stdlib? oh well, I&amp;#39;ll keep using it, because what other options are there?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, a new consensus is emerging that AI tools like Claude are uniquely suited to managing Nix configurations because the system&amp;#39;s rollback capabilities provide a safe environment for experimentation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482095&quot; title=&quot;The author almost touches on the one more topic that I adore about Nix, but ends up just so missing it: NixOS is absolutely incredible for its ability to be configured through AI tooling. And I don&amp;#39;t mean that it&amp;#39;s better than other operating systems, I mean that it&amp;#39;s the only game in town. I&amp;#39;ve been using Nix, both the package manager and the operating system, for years by now. I agree with all of the author&amp;#39;s points, it really does deliver, the declarative nature is superb, and there&amp;#39;s this…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480553&quot; title=&quot;A lot of us use NixOS/nix yet haven&amp;#39;t read any documentation nor hand-written nix ourself. That&amp;#39;s Claude Code&amp;#39;s job.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some skeptics view this reliance on LLMs as a workaround for the OS being too difficult to manage manually, potentially preventing users from becoming true &amp;#34;power users&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47485123&quot; title=&quot;This feels like a very high-tech solution to a problem that doesn&amp;#39;t really exist. Why involve an LLM to install Hyprland when &amp;#39;sudo dnf install hyprland&amp;#39; works fine? I feel like you&amp;#39;re mistaking Nix being &amp;#39;AI-ready&amp;#39; as a feature, when in reality, you&amp;#39;re just forced to use an LLM because Nix is too annoying to manage manually.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480779&quot; title=&quot;I would have never become a power user of Linux were I used LLM to do the installation of Gentoo once upon a time. :( So do you guys not know much about the distro you are using, or how does this work? I honestly thought your comment was sarcasm, but apparently it is not.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116261301913660830&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GrapheneOS will remain usable by anyone without requiring personal information&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (grapheneos.social)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482217&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;324 points · 86 comments · by nothrowaways&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GrapheneOS has announced it will remain globally accessible without requiring personal information, identification, or accounts, even if certain regional regulations prevent device sales. The project also confirmed a long-term partnership with Motorola to support future devices that meet its strict privacy and security standards. &lt;a href=&quot;https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116261301913660830&quot; title=&quot;Title: GrapheneOS (@GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social)    URL Source: https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116261301913660830    Published Time: 2026-03-20T11:38:02Z    Markdown Content:  # GrapheneOS: &amp;#39;GrapheneOS will remain usable …&amp;#39; - GrapheneOS Mastodon    #### Recent searches    No recent searches    #### Search options    Not available on grapheneos.social.    **grapheneos.social** is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.    [![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GrapheneOS is praised for its privacy-focused features, such as allowing users to disable &amp;#34;presidential level&amp;#34; wireless alerts that are otherwise mandatory in countries like Canada &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47483394&quot; title=&quot;Canadians not being able to disable Amber alerts sent at presidential level all the time might also be interested to be able to sleep again...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47483791&quot; title=&quot;Does GrapheneOS fix that problem as well? Because at some point sending everything at the max alert level is going to get people killed. The max alert level should be reserved only for immediately threats to your life in the nearby area, because otherwise you train people to ignore the alerts.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47483969&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Wireless alerts are completely optional since GrapheneOS adds a toggle for the otherwise mandatory presidential alert type. This is particularly useful in Canada where the government abuses the system and sends every type of alert as a presidential alert to stop users from being able to opt out of weather and amber alerts. https://grapheneos.org/features#other-features&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While users appreciate the project&amp;#39;s principled stand against age-verification laws, some express concern that partnerships with hardware manufacturers like Motorola could be jeopardized by non-compliance with regional legislation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47483325&quot; title=&quot;I appreciate the principled stand, but on the other hand the CA law only requires users to self-identify when setting up accounts (and then the OS will expose age to apps), that seems fairly toothless (though wrongheaded) compared to TX and UT wanting to scan photo IDs[1] 1: https://www.tomshardware.com/software/operating-systems/cali...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47483189&quot; title=&quot;I have to wonder how this will impact their partnership with Motorola. Presumably, Motorola will have more difficulty if they&amp;#39;re found not to be complying with relevant law... I hope GrapheneOS isn&amp;#39;t completely banking on their partnership succeeding. If Motorola devices ever became the only devices that GrapheneOS works on, and it&amp;#39;s being done with Motorola&amp;#39;s blessing, then it could be more easily legislated out of existence.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant barrier to adoption remains the potential incompatibility with essential regional services like Swedish banking apps and digital IDs, leading some to consider a two-phone setup &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482958&quot; title=&quot;Of course :^) I&amp;#39;m close to jumping ship to GrapheneOS, but as a Swedish resident I really need our digital id services, digital mailbox, and banking apps. I have seen their page on app support, but I am slightly afraid its not up to date / will break any time. I guess the solution is to use one banking android phone and one GrapheneOS for everyday use.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47483069&quot; title=&quot;Do the banking apps have features that the (mobile?) websites do not? Genuine question, I have no frame of reference for Swedish banks&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://larstofus.com/2026/03/22/the-gold-standard-of-optimization-a-look-under-the-hood-of-rollercoaster-tycoon/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The gold standard of optimization: A look under the hood of RollerCoaster Tycoon&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (larstofus.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480886&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;310 points · 90 comments · by mariuz&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RollerCoaster Tycoon achieved legendary performance by utilizing Assembly language, aggressive bit-shifting, and clever game design choices, such as replacing complex pathfinding with randomized guest movement and omitting agent collisions to simulate thousands of park visitors on 1999 hardware. &lt;a href=&quot;https://larstofus.com/2026/03/22/the-gold-standard-of-optimization-a-look-under-the-hood-of-rollercoaster-tycoon/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The gold standard of optimization: A look under the hood of RollerCoaster Tycoon    URL Source: https://larstofus.com/2026/03/22/the-gold-standard-of-optimization-a-look-under-the-hood-of-rollercoaster-tycoon/    Published Time: 2026-03-22T17:17:27+00:00    Markdown Content:  # The gold standard of optimization: A look under the hood of RollerCoaster Tycoon – Larst Of Us  [Skip to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a shift in game development where modern hardware and compilers have largely replaced the need for low-level arithmetic micro-optimizations with a focus on memory layout and cache efficiency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481974&quot; title=&quot;What language is this article talking where compilers don&amp;#39;t optimize multiplication and division by powers of two? Even for division of signed integers, current compilers emit inline code that handles positive and negative values separately, still avoiding the division instruction (unless when optimizing for size, of course).&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47483649&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Numeric characteristics are absolutely still a consideration for game designers even in 2026, one that influences what numbers they use in their game designs. The good ones, anyways. I used to think like this, not anymore. What convinced me that these sort of micro-optimizations just don&amp;#39;t matter is reading up on the cycle count of modern processors. One a Zen 5, Integer addition is a single cycle, multiplication 3, and division ~12.  But that&amp;#39;s not the full story.  The CPU can have 5…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that designers must still understand numeric constraints to prevent performance degradation and manage data structures—citing examples like Minecraft’s 4-bit metadata and Warcraft’s power-of-two map sizes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482166&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Imagine a programmer asking a game designer if they could change their formula to use an 8 instead of a 9.5 because it is a number that the CPU prefers to calculate with. There is a very good argument to be made that a game designer should never have to worry about the runtime performance characteristics of binary arithmetic in their life, that’s a fate reserved for programmers Numeric characteristics are absolutely still a consideration for game designers even in 2026, one that influences…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482737&quot; title=&quot;I think Minecraft&amp;#39;s lighting system is a good example: there are 16 different brightness levels, from 0 to 15. This allows the game to store light levels in 4 bytes per block. Similarly, redstone has 16 power levels: 0 to 15. This allows it to store the power level using 4 bits. In fact, quite a lot of attributes in Minecraft blocks are squeezed into 4 bits. I think the system has grown to be more flexible these days, but I&amp;#39;m pretty sure the chunk data structure used to set aside 4 bits for…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47484507&quot; title=&quot;Warcraft 1 (1994), Warcraft 2 (1995), and StarCraft (1998) all use power-of-2 aligned map sizes (64 blocks, 128 blocks, and 256 blocks) so the shift-factor could be pre-computed to avoid division/multiplication, which was dang slow on those old 386/486 computers. Each map block was 2x2 cells, and each cell, 8x8 pixels. Made rendering background cells and fog-of-war overlays very straightforward assembly language. All of Warcraft/etc. had only a few thousand lines of assembly language to render…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;—others contend that game quality is now primarily defined by mechanics and immersion rather than extreme runtime efficiency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482719&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;and in many cases it is one of many silent contributing factors to a noticeable decrease in the quality of their game&amp;#39; Game designers are not so constrained anymore by the limits of the hardware, unless they want to push boundaries. Quality of a game is not just the most efficient runtime performance - it is mainly a question if the game is fun to play. Do the mechanics work. Are there severe bugs. Is the story consistent and the characters relatable. Is something breaking immersion. So ...…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, while the monumental feat of writing games like *RollerCoaster Tycoon* in assembly is admired, the industry has largely moved toward higher-level languages to balance performance with development time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481814&quot; title=&quot;I had always heard about how RCT was built in Assembly, and thought it was very impressive. The more I actually started digging into assembly, the more this task seems monumental and impossible. I didn&amp;#39;t know there was a fork and I&amp;#39;m excited to look into it&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47484507&quot; title=&quot;Warcraft 1 (1994), Warcraft 2 (1995), and StarCraft (1998) all use power-of-2 aligned map sizes (64 blocks, 128 blocks, and 256 blocks) so the shift-factor could be pre-computed to avoid division/multiplication, which was dang slow on those old 386/486 computers. Each map block was 2x2 cells, and each cell, 8x8 pixels. Made rendering background cells and fog-of-war overlays very straightforward assembly language. All of Warcraft/etc. had only a few thousand lines of assembly language to render…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tomshardware.com/software/operating-systems/grapheneos-refuses-to-comply-with-age-verification-laws&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GrapheneOS refuses to comply with new age verification laws for operating system&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tomshardware.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47479183&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;229 points · 117 comments · by CrypticShift&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GrapheneOS has announced it will refuse to comply with new age verification laws in regions like Brazil and California, stating it will never require personal identification or accounts even if it results in the operating system being banned from sale in those markets. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tomshardware.com/software/operating-systems/grapheneos-refuses-to-comply-with-age-verification-laws&quot; title=&quot;GrapheneOS refuses to comply with new age verification laws for operating systems — group says it will never require personal information    Doesn’t care if its devices can’t be sold in regions that require ID verification.    [Skip to main content](#main)    Unlock world-class roadmaps &amp;amp; trusted Bench data.  See More    ×    ## Unparalleled insights. Industry analysis. Insider access.    **Tom&amp;#39;s Hardware** Premium equips you with world-class  coverage and detailed insights into the evolving hardware…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on GrapheneOS&amp;#39;s refusal to implement age verification, with some users praising the stance against &amp;#34;spyware regimes&amp;#34; and others dismissing it as &amp;#34;virtue signaling&amp;#34; since the law primarily targets pre-installed operating systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480887&quot; title=&quot;Seems like a pure virtue signaling: they don&amp;#39;t sell or make hardware. It is mandated only for pre-installed operating systems, from what I understand.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481766&quot; title=&quot;Good on them. Devices shouldn&amp;#39;t collect any extraneous data by default other than that needed to fulfill a feature a user consciously selects, and that includes this stupid age verification spyware regimes are pushing. An adult had to pay for the ISP connection; that&amp;#39;s the extent of age verification needed.  We shouldn&amp;#39;t be demanding adults expose their identities to for-profit entities and surveillance states, so much as mandating for-profit companies make parental controls easier to use, more…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that OS-level verification is impractical for shared family devices and suggest that malicious compliance, such as allowing fake data, might be a more effective strategy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482251&quot; title=&quot;Age verification at the OS level makes no sense to me.  Most households aren&amp;#39;t going to have a separate device for every family member and so you will end up with a tablet or computer set up by one of the parents (and thus having their age stored) that will be used by both parents and children.  Likewise, people generally won&amp;#39;t create a separate account for every potential user.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481131&quot; title=&quot;I think that malicious compliance all the way might have been the better option here. If a birth date is all that is needed, let the user enter a random one. If actual biometric verification is needed alongside, let the user also paste the code to a fake biometric validator that always returns valid. It is the same philosophy as with an app that forcibly wants an invasive permission to the detriment of the user. Let the app have the permission while in a sandbox so it sees nothing.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant point of contention is GrapheneOS&amp;#39;s partnership with Motorola; commenters disagree on whether Motorola will be forced to comply with state laws or if the partnership will dissolve over these &amp;#34;puritanical&amp;#34; requirements &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47479968&quot; title=&quot;How&amp;#39;s that gonna pan out with Motorola?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480931&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;ve partnered with Motorola to have it preinstalled on phones, this is in TFA.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480599&quot; title=&quot;If Motorola have a problem with it, they obviously aren&amp;#39;t the right partner for Graphene. Graphene obviously won&amp;#39;t want to partner with a company that immediately bends over backwards for this kind of puritanical nonsense.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480696&quot; title=&quot;Motorola will obviously have a problem with violating the law in several US states. Like, what&amp;#39;s unclear here? Do you seriously say that corporations should just ignore laws which they don&amp;#39;t like?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thenerdreich.com/peter-thiels-antichrist-circus-smacked-down-in-rome/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Vatican Rebukes Peter Thiel&amp;#39;s Antichrist Lectures in Rome&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (thenerdreich.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47475849&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;180 points · 143 comments · by vrganj&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Vatican advisor has condemned billionaire Peter Thiel’s lectures on the Antichrist as heresy, accusing him of perverting religious concepts to justify authoritarianism and the destruction of liberal democracy. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thenerdreich.com/peter-thiels-antichrist-circus-smacked-down-in-rome/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Vatican Rebukes Peter Thiel&amp;#39;s Antichrist Lectures in Rome    URL Source: https://www.thenerdreich.com/peter-thiels-antichrist-circus-smacked-down-in-rome/    Published Time: 2026-03-20T19:16:45.000Z    Markdown Content:  Peter Thiel’s Antichrist lectures have been rejected by theologians and mocked by comedians, but he still cannot stop talking about the Antichrist. This week, the billionaire delivered his trademark four-part Antichrist lecture at a private venue within sight of the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely attribute Peter Thiel’s provocative lectures to the insulating effects of extreme wealth, which some suggest can foster &amp;#34;religious psychosis&amp;#34; or a detachment from reality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47477351&quot; title=&quot;I wonder, if I was surrounded by wealth in the same way, if I would schedule talks on my wacky ideas. The blind encouragement of insurmountable wealth must be intoxicating.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47476578&quot; title=&quot;He seems like the kind of guy who was only ever a few bad days away from having a full-on break with reality. I wonder if he&amp;#39;s been talking to AI a lot and it pushed him over the edge to psychosis?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47476914&quot; title=&quot;This guy is obviously on drugs half of the time, his wealth shields him from reality and the yes-men around him let his crazy anti-humanist ideas fester in his mind and turn into religious psychosis. No need for AI here. In any sane place, his hate of democracy and freedom would make him a pariah. Instead, he is the current US Vice President&amp;#39;s mentor and most trusted advisor.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users express interest in reading the primary arguments behind the lectures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47476646&quot; title=&quot;It seems these lectures are closed but does anyone have a transcript or writeup of the core arguments? I&amp;#39;d be interested to know what he is saying first hand.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others criticize both Thiel and the Vatican as entities that have historically caused harm or abandoned core Christian values like charity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47477776&quot; title=&quot;These people are not interested the love and charity parts of Christianity. They are interested only in the hate and doom parts of it.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47476715&quot; title=&quot;They don&amp;#39;t own Rome anymore, the Vatican is their own country now thanks to ol&amp;#39; Benny.  Anyway, both parties here are idiots with high opinions of themselves who actually believe in a pile nonsense, but which of the two has really caused more harm for humanity? There is no &amp;#39;THE Antichrist&amp;#39; there are only antichrists, plural, normal not supernatural people and organizations that behave in a notably non-christlike way, and both parties here seem to qualify easily.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47476627&quot; title=&quot;The Catholic church has a very shall we say complicated stance on democracy, freedom of religion and human rights.  Nowadays they realise that the Western world has shifted from their theological and biblical position so they couch it in word salad sophistry.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights Thiel&amp;#39;s significant political influence, noting his role as a mentor to the current US Vice President and drawing parallels to Elon Musk’s strategic use of wealth for political leverage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47477823&quot; title=&quot;One might say that Elon&amp;#39;s acquisition of Twitter is the ultimate manifestation of this.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47476914&quot; title=&quot;This guy is obviously on drugs half of the time, his wealth shields him from reality and the yes-men around him let his crazy anti-humanist ideas fester in his mind and turn into religious psychosis. No need for AI here. In any sane place, his hate of democracy and freedom would make him a pariah. Instead, he is the current US Vice President&amp;#39;s mentor and most trusted advisor.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47477894&quot; title=&quot;You don&amp;#39;t think he was aware of the potential to leverage Twitter to elect a friendly president and alleviate his severe regulatory challenges? That part was just a happy accident?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://avaloniaui.net/blog/maui-avalonia-preview-1&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;MAUI Is Coming to Linux&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (avaloniaui.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47478687&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;189 points · 91 comments · by DeathArrow&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Avalonia UI has announced the first preview of its new backend for .NET MAUI, enabling developers to deploy .NET MAUI applications to Linux and WebAssembly with consistent, drawn user interfaces. &lt;a href=&quot;https://avaloniaui.net/blog/maui-avalonia-preview-1&quot; title=&quot;Title: MAUI Avalonia Preview 1 - Avalonia UI    URL Source: https://avaloniaui.net/blog/maui-avalonia-preview-1    Markdown Content:  Alongside Avalonia 12 and the .NET 11 Previews, I am pleased to announce the first preview of our [Avalonia backend for .NET MAUI](https://github.com/AvaloniaUI/Avalonia.Controls.Maui). Now, you can leverage Avalonia to deploy .NET MAUI apps to new platforms, like Linux and WebAssembly.    Since last fall, we’ve made great strides in bringing the power of Avalonia to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The expansion of .NET MAUI to Linux via Avalonia has sparked debate over the framework&amp;#39;s viability, with some questioning why effort is being spent on a project they perceive as &amp;#34;semi-abandonware&amp;#34; by Microsoft &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480550&quot; title=&quot;From a quick look, I can&amp;#39;t find a reason. why? Even MS doesn&amp;#39;t fully believe in Maui, as it seems they reblessed WPF. For Avalonia to do the work of MS seems weird, their own free regular WPF-like Avalonia UI toolkit is already the standard for cross desktop development. I was looking for the line: Microsoft sponsored us. Even then I would not understand why they would spend effort on a doomed project. I know Avalonia being a small company has a big task ahead of porting Avalonia UI to Wayland,…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481374&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Even MS doesn&amp;#39;t fully believe in Maui Source: I made it up.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical discussions highlight the complexity of developing for Wayland, noting that its intricate surface types and poor documentation make it difficult for toolkits to provide full support &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47479893&quot; title=&quot;I wish they support Linux wholeheartedly, a lot of toolkits and GUI frameworks do it by half-assing things, mostly because Wayland is difficult to understand. In Wayland you have multiple ways to render windows, not just the XDG top level window. It works via surfaces, and here is a list I&amp;#39;ve discovered so far: - XDG Top Level Window    - Child Window    - Popup Surface    - Layer surface (like task-bars, shell overlays)    - Subsurface (region in another surface)    - IME Panel Surface (surface…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480384&quot; title=&quot;Not to mention that there&amp;#39;s no clear documentation for this anywhere. A while ago I was attempting to debug some Wayland-specific issues with a graphics library, it turns out the issue was that the little documentation there was, was wrong about what is and isn&amp;#39;t nullable.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480777&quot; title=&quot;I found https://wayland.app/protocols/ very helpful so far. That and studying smithay code.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that Wayland lacks a native software ecosystem &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481046&quot; title=&quot;Wayland is a mess. Perhaps https://github.com/X11Libre/xserver can revive the older ecosystem. Almost nobody writes for wayland. About two years ago I tried to switch, then gave up when I realised how many things are missing on wayland. And then I noticed that barely anyone wrote software for wayland. It feels like a corporate advertisement project really. GNOME and KDE push for wayland now.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that most users already interact with it through major toolkits like GTK and Qt &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481169&quot; title=&quot;What does “nobody writes for Wayland” mean? If you write software using GTK, Qt, or FLTK then you are writing Wayland software. The majority of Linux desktops are Wayland at this point. Nobody writes software for them? The Steamdeck uses gamescope which is Wayland. GNOME, COSMIC, Budgie, Niri, and Hyprland are not just Wayland but Wayland only. KDE will be Wayland only soon. Cinnamon is switching to Wayland. XFCE is writing a Wayland compositor. What percentage of Linux desktop users are not…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482083&quot; title=&quot;It just means &amp;#39;noone&amp;#39; uses the wayland APIs directly, but instead they leave the wayland complexity to GTK,Qt or FLTK, and they call their app a Qt app, not a Wayland app.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, critics point out that the current implementation lacks production-ready accessibility features &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480666&quot; title=&quot;Accessibility bridging between .NET MAUI and Avalonia is currently limited. Nowhere near production ready, got it.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481359&quot; title=&quot;Almost nobody needs accessibility; let&amp;#39;s be realistic, it&amp;#39;s obviously not a priority. The priority is to put this out the door (MVP style).&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mtbest.net/chest-fridge/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chest Fridge (2009)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mtbest.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47473279&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;176 points · 100 comments · by wolfi1&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Converting chest freezers into refrigerators significantly improves energy efficiency and food preservation by minimizing cold air loss and temperature fluctuations. Modern hybrid units further reduce power consumption and peak demand, offering a sustainable, low-cost alternative to traditional vertical-door refrigerators. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mtbest.net/chest-fridge/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Chest fridge    URL Source: https://mtbest.net/chest-fridge/    Markdown Content:  # Chest fridge    [# Mt Best- mtbest.net](https://mtbest.net/)    *   [Sustainability](https://mtbest.net/chest-fridge/)      *   [Sustainable House features](https://mtbest.net/solar-house-tour/)      *   [Energy Efficiency](https://mtbest.net/energy-efficiency/)      *   [Tips for your home](https://mtbest.net/tips-for-your-home/)      *   [Greenhouse](https://mtbest.net/greenhouse/)      *   [House in the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While chest fridges offer superior energy efficiency by preventing cold air from escaping, users argue that the loss of vertical convenience and floor space makes them impractical for primary use in dense urban areas &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47473649&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a cool idea, and might be great for a secondary fridge. For a primary fridge though, it&amp;#39;s so much more convenient to have direct access to everything through a vertical door. I like energy efficiency, but I&amp;#39;m willing to pay 300kWh a year (around $40 here) for that convenience, let alone the space efficiency.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47473689&quot; title=&quot;Most people in dense urban areas would actually pay less. By going vertical you’re freezing a whole m2 that was otherwise necessarily occupied by the fridge. In most places, 300 kWh is much cheaper than an extra irrevocable m2 for your fridge. Plus, a horizontal fridge is just… convenient. You can’t even put things on top of a vertical fridge.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47474408&quot; title=&quot;They seem to have mixed up horizontal and vertical, and if they did, then my reading is that they&amp;#39;re saying the cost of the extra floor space (and the loss of the &amp;#39;shelf&amp;#39; space on top of the fridge) when using a chest fridge makes the economics unfavourable for people in dense urban areas, even with the energy savings. At least, I&amp;#39;m hoping that&amp;#39;s what they meant. If they really meant horizontal and vertical in the way they used it then I&amp;#39;ve got no idea either.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion highlights innovative alternatives like pneumatic &amp;#34;pop-up&amp;#34; round fridges that utilize lazy Susans for accessibility, though critics worry about the mechanical complexity and difficulty of cleaning spills in such deep units &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47474348&quot; title=&quot;Reminds me of Fly Away Home with the round fridge that would lift out of the counter. True story:   &amp;#39;The refrigerator is round, rising from under the granite countertop with the touch of the button. “The pneumatic fridge works with air compression,” she says. “You step on the button and it pops up and the racks spin like a lazy Susan. Cold air is heavy so it stays cold.”&amp;#39; https://www.thestar.com/life/home-and-garden/paula-lishman-a...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47474666&quot; title=&quot;Now that is the coolest fridge I&amp;#39;ve ever seen. Found a video of it in action (yes, featuring the same dad joke all over the comments but that is not stopping me): https://youtu.be/RoGuvvzHY1A?t=416 That entire place is mind-bending.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47475437&quot; title=&quot;Mind-bending indeed, but looks pretty impractical. In an ordinary fridge, if your egg carton is a bit out of place, your door may not close properly. In this one, you&amp;#39;re going to have liquid omelette slathered all over the place, and how do you even clean the bottom of that thing?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, the consensus is that modern kitchen layouts are structurally biased toward tall, shallow appliances, making chest fridges a difficult retrofit despite their thermal advantages &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47473690&quot; title=&quot;If you completely remodeled a kitchen around a chest fridge it might not be too terribly inconvenient. But the major blocker is that virtually every kitchen is designed with a perfect spot for a tall, relatively shallow fridge.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/22/palantir-extends-reach-into-british-state-as-it-gets-access-to-sensitive-fca-data&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Palantir extends reach into British state as gets access to sensitive FCA data&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theguardian.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480200&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;184 points · 59 comments · by chrisjj&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority has awarded US tech firm Palantir a three-month trial contract to analyze sensitive internal data to help tackle financial crimes like fraud and money laundering, sparking fresh privacy concerns over the company&amp;#39;s growing access to British state information. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/22/palantir-extends-reach-into-british-state-as-it-gets-access-to-sensitive-fca-data&quot; title=&quot;Palantir extends reach into British state as it gets access to sensitive FCA data    Exclusive: Allowing US tech firm to analyse intelligence in name of tackling fraud raises fresh concerns over privacy    [Skip to main content](#maincontent)[Skip to navigation](#navigation)    Close dialogue1/1Next imagePrevious imageToggle caption    [Skip to navigation](#navigation)    [Print…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The integration of Palantir into the UK&amp;#39;s Financial Conduct Authority has sparked debate over whether the British economy is structurally reliant on money laundering or if regulators are genuinely attempting to curb it &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481289&quot; title=&quot;As a Brit, I&amp;#39;ve never had the sense the UK (specifically the City of London) has any genuine interest in tackling money laundering. I suspect our economy is structurally reliant upon us being extremely good at it.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481613&quot; title=&quot;Really? What are you basing that on? Having worked at FinTechs and in finance in general that doesn&amp;#39;t ring true at all.  The FCA definitely takes anti-money laundering checks quite seriously. e.g. (off the top of my head) NatWest were fined £264 million for AML breaches. I&amp;#39;m no expert by any means but if I wanted to flout the rules I&amp;#39;d definitely consider a few other juristictions before the City.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that current Anti-Money Laundering (AML) tech is primitive and easily bypassed by &amp;#34;criminal masterminds,&amp;#34; others suggest the system is intentionally designed to catch small-time crooks while remaining &amp;#34;deliberately obtuse&amp;#34; toward high-level oligarch wealth &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481756&quot; title=&quot;AML tech is so primitive, it almost looks like it&amp;#39;s designed that anyone &amp;#39;in the know&amp;#39; will know how to not be detected. Eg. Most AML checks are done because someone wrote some triggering keyword in the payment reference field.     Do we honestly think a criminal mastermind won&amp;#39;t manage to come up with something else to write there?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481832&quot; title=&quot;The AML you are thinking of is designed to catch small time crooks and drug mules (and maybe also dumb terrorist supporters). They are not really designed (or more specifically deliberately obtuse towards) Slavic oligarch money. Not all &amp;#39;corruption&amp;#39; and money laundering are treated equally. Places like London (not to mention Jersey), Switzerland, and Singapore are more for good old fashioned siphoning-of-national-assets type of corruption where there&amp;#39;s almost always a &amp;#39;clean&amp;#39; paper trail to…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics question the validity of Palantir’s claimed successes and the government&amp;#39;s ability to enforce data destruction clauses, though some suggest the company is simply a more competent alternative to &amp;#34;inept&amp;#34; Big Four consultancies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47481053&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Palantir has previously defended its work, saying it has led to about 99,000 extra operations being scheduled in the NHS No hard evidence of this was provided or is readily available. &amp;gt; helped UK police tackle domestic violence And precisely how was this done? &amp;gt; Palantir will have to destroy data after completion of the contract Contractual obligations that are not practically enforceable will not be honored.  I don&amp;#39;t think these individual administrative agencies have the acumen necessary to…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47482583&quot; title=&quot;It’s likely an impossible choice, between inept big four consultancy groups (that charge $$$, deliver little, and run everything through manual excel entry) vs palantir who likely will deliver results. I have no love for Palantir but at least they’re competent. During covid, palantir had to elbow its way to sell to the UK govt and replaced dilapidated “solutions” from the big four.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant concern regarding the influence of Palantir’s leadership and its historical ties to the CIA&amp;#39;s venture capital&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://noquiche.fyi/voodoo&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Building an FPGA 3dfx Voodoo with Modern RTL Tools&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (noquiche.fyi)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47477284&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;175 points · 40 comments · by fayalalebrun&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Using SpinalHDL and the conetrace debugging tool, a developer successfully created an FPGA reimplementation of the 3dfx Voodoo 1 by precisely modeling its complex fixed-function hardware behaviors and register semantics to match the original chip&amp;#39;s exact rendering output. &lt;a href=&quot;https://noquiche.fyi/voodoo&quot; title=&quot;Title: Building an FPGA 3dfx Voodoo with Modern RTL Tools    URL Source: https://noquiche.fyi/voodoo    Markdown Content:  # Building an FPGA 3dfx Voodoo with Modern RTL Tools    1.   [Home](https://noquiche.fyi/)  2.   |  3.   [GitHub](https://github.com/fayalalebrun)  4.   |  5.   [About Quiche](https://www.pbm.com/~lindahl/real.programmers.html)  6.   |  7.   [](https://noquiche.fyi/feed.xml)    # Building an FPGA 3dfx Voodoo with Modern RTL Tools    ## Table of Contents    *   [A Fixed-Function Chip That Is…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The project is widely praised as a quintessential Hacker News endeavor, evoking nostalgia for the Voodoo era&amp;#39;s distinct branding and challenging technical hurdles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47478718&quot; title=&quot;The Voodoo cards had no right to look as good as they did for their time. Someone rebuilding one from scratch is exactly the kind of project HN was made for.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47478332&quot; title=&quot;My first video card. Getting it working in linux in ~1999 was really not easy, especially for a teenager with no linux experience. My networking card wasn&amp;#39;t working either, so I had to run to a friend&amp;#39;s house for dial-up internet access, searching for help on Altavista. Very cool project. Way above my head, still!&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47478421&quot; title=&quot;I love the names and branding of that era. Technology today is far more advanced but it doesn’t have that same excitement for consumers.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users debated the architectural choices of the register implementation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47478777&quot; title=&quot;I find it odd the author adds all these extra semantics to their input registers, rather than keeping the FIFOs, &amp;#39;drain + FIFOs&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;float to fixed point converting register&amp;#39;, etc as separate components, separate from the task of being memory mapped registers. The central problem they were running into was one where they let the external controller asynchronously change state in the middle of the compute unit using it. I&amp;#39;m noting down this conetrace for the future though, seems like a useful…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47478895&quot; title=&quot;Maybe I&amp;#39;m misunderstanding, but that functionality is implemented in another component. The register bank only records the category of each register and implements the memory-mapped register functionality. This list of registers and their categories are then imported in separate components which sit between incoming writes and the register bank. The advantage is that everything which describes the properties of the registers is in a single file. You don&amp;#39;t have to look in three different places…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others questioned the hardware requirements and whether the design is intended for modern FPGAs or simulation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47484432&quot; title=&quot;It’s been a while since I’ve struggled with Xilinx tools, but I can’t imagine there aren’t any hardware limitations these days. Does this run on a Spartan 6, or do you need the latest UltraScale for it? Or does this only run in simulation anyway?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also touched on historical competitors like the NV-1, noting how industry standards like DirectX eventually favored triangles over more complex technologies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47480038&quot; title=&quot;Yes but the Nvidia NV-1 preceding the Vooodoo was much more impressive. Using NURBS you could display perfectly round objects. Also it had forward texture mapping which significantly improves cache utilization and would be beneficial even today. It was just way harder to program for. Triangles are much simpler to understand than bezier curves after all. And after Microsoft declared that DirectX only supports triangles the NV-1 was immediately dead.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>