<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Top HN by ALCAZAR</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily</link><description>Daily summaries of the top Hacker News stories.</description><item><title>Top HN · 2026-06-04</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-06-04</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dailycal.org/news/campus/academics/failing-grades-soar-as-professors-see-greater-ai-usage-dwindling-math-skills-in-uc-berkeley/article_16fad0bf-02cb-4b8c-8d88-888ffd9f8608.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Failing grades soar with AI usage, dwindling math skills in Berkeley CS classes&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (dailycal.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48392004&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;754 points · 728 comments · by littlexsparkee&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Failing grades in UC Berkeley computer science classes soared in spring 2026, with instructors citing increased AI-related academic dishonesty, poor mathematical preparedness, and reduced student engagement as primary causes for the departure from departmental grading guidelines. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dailycal.org/news/campus/academics/failing-grades-soar-as-professors-see-greater-ai-usage-dwindling-math-skills-in-uc-berkeley/article_16fad0bf-02cb-4b8c-8d88-888ffd9f8608.html&quot; title=&quot;Failing grades soar as professors see greater AI usage, dwindling math skills in UC Berkeley computer science classes    The percentage of failing grades in multiple UC Berkeley computer science classes in spring 2026 is significantly higher than past semesters and marks a departure from the department’s grading guidelines.    [Skip to main content](#main-page-container)    You are the owner of this article.    [Edit…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some observers attribute soaring failure rates to students using LLMs as a &amp;#34;shortcut&amp;#34; that bypasses the cognitive struggle necessary for deep learning &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393790&quot; title=&quot;I have some sympathy for these kids. If LLMs were around when I was a student, I would&amp;#39;ve also used them to &amp;#39;speed up&amp;#39; my homework assignments then proceed to fail all my tests. Now I work mostly with PhDs who were at the top of every academic environment they&amp;#39;ve ever been in. And yet I can see their thinking skills rapidly declining as well; many of them can no longer brainstorm, code, think deeply, or write without an LLM present doing 90% of the work. Many of them can no longer sit quietly…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48397524&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If LLMs were around when I was a student, I would&amp;#39;ve also used them to &amp;#39;speed up&amp;#39; my homework assignments then proceed to fail all my tests. You go to a university because you are deeply interested in understanding the subject that you study. Doing the homework and the tests are just the &amp;#39;goalposts&amp;#39; to check for yourself whether you made progress on this. So, as long as you are not under time pressure (which you in some degree courses unluckily are), there is simply no need to &amp;#39;speed up&amp;#39; any…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue the decline is actually driven by the removal of standardized testing requirements, which previously served as the best predictor of academic preparation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393800&quot; title=&quot;The likely &amp;#39;real&amp;#39; reason is hidden in one paragraph within the article and has nothing to do with the implication of the eye-catching title: &amp;#39;Both Garcia and Ranade have joined more than 1,300 UC faculty in signing a petition calling for the reinstatement of ACT and SAT standardized testing scores for STEM admissions in the UC system. The petition and its accompanying open letter detail similar concerns with students’ mathematical preparation.&amp;#39; Around COVID times many top universities…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Professors note that while some students use AI responsibly for architectural guidance, many use it to generate work they cannot explain or understand, necessitating a shift toward in-person assessments and &amp;#34;flipped classroom&amp;#34; models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48396988&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If LLMs were around when I was a student, I would&amp;#39;ve also used them to &amp;#39;speed up&amp;#39; my homework assignments then proceed to fail all my tests. I agree - I would have been toast.  I wonder if the teachers/colleges need to change the way they teach and assess.  Let the students use the AI tools they like (perhaps guide them how they can use them professionally), but test regularly and early on the skills/knowledge they&amp;#39;re meant to be gaining offline and in person.  Oh and don&amp;#39;t give Fs for…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48396418&quot; title=&quot;CS Professor here: just yesterday I did the discussion of a course projects&amp;#39; (Parallel Computing), and one of the three groups that I did yesterday have clearly gone the ChatGPT way. They couldn&amp;#39;t even understand the choices the LLM made regarding the architecture, etc. The way to &amp;#39;catch&amp;#39; these students is similar to what we did in the past when students copied from other students which is &amp;#39;to give them rope to hang&amp;#39; - ask for clarifications until they follow unintended paths that lead nowhere.…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48397045&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I read a few years ago about a teacher (I think highschool) who put his lectures on YouTube for students to view in their own time and then used the in class hours for interaction, questions, tests. That seems like a smart approach. It reverses the traditional model of &amp;#39;lecture in class, homework outside of class&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond the classroom, there is a growing concern that constant AI reliance is causing a measurable decline in the ability of even high-level professionals to brainstorm or think deeply without digital assistance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393790&quot; title=&quot;I have some sympathy for these kids. If LLMs were around when I was a student, I would&amp;#39;ve also used them to &amp;#39;speed up&amp;#39; my homework assignments then proceed to fail all my tests. Now I work mostly with PhDs who were at the top of every academic environment they&amp;#39;ve ever been in. And yet I can see their thinking skills rapidly declining as well; many of them can no longer brainstorm, code, think deeply, or write without an LLM present doing 90% of the work. Many of them can no longer sit quietly…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48395231&quot; title=&quot;I’m not noticing the decline in my own abilities any more than I had before using them. I finished undergrad 20 years ago and my once sharp math skills had been severely diminished within only 5-10 years. Just simple arithmetic and percentages that I could rapidly do in my head became dependent on calculators/spreadsheets. For all other trivia type knowledge, my brain has offloaded it to the internet RAM in my pocket. It’s a familiar feeling of when some question comes up and I think “oh, I…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://e360.yale.edu/digest/trump-ooi-amoc&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;U.S. to dismantle system tracking Atlantic currents that are at risk of collapse&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (e360.yale.edu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48392232&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;617 points · 459 comments · by rguiscard&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Trump administration is dismantling the Ocean Observatories Initiative, a network of over 900 instruments providing critical data on marine life and the potential collapse of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://e360.yale.edu/digest/trump-ooi-amoc&quot; title=&quot;Title: U.S. to Dismantle System Tracking Atlantic Currents That Are at Risk of Collapse    URL Source: https://e360.yale.edu/digest/trump-ooi-amoc    Markdown Content:  [![Image 1: A mooring used in the Ocean Observatories Initiative is recovered off the coast of…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The decision to dismantle Atlantic current tracking is viewed by some as &amp;#34;performative climate denialism&amp;#34; intended to suppress data that might spark activism or interfere with fossil fuel interests &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48394009&quot; title=&quot;I wouldn&amp;#39;t assume that this is about cost cutting. If the goal were saving money, the cheapest option by far would be to leave the hardware in the water and just stop funding the monitoring. Instead the plan is an expensive operation to send ships out to extract 900+ instruments from under two miles of ocean. It&amp;#39;s clear that this is driven by performative climate denialism and a pro fossil fuel stance. The Trump administration made a billion dollar deal with an energy company to stop…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48394825&quot; title=&quot;But… why? Climate change is very much real and even stubborn deep-right voters like my father now ‘believe’ in it. Ok, some people make some cash. But wouldn’t they anyway? I don’t understand this need to keep pandering to a minority and to destroy ecosystems.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters contrast the relatively low cost of basic science with the massive expenditures of the U.S. military, such as the $40,000 hourly maintenance cost of an F-35 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393326&quot; title=&quot;What really puts all of this into perspective for me is I work in academia and one of my friends works for a defense contractor. He told me the maintenance cost per flight hour of F-35 was a bit more than $40k, which is significantly more than I make in a year as a grad student. It&amp;#39;s crazy basic science is what&amp;#39;s been the focus of so many cuts while it&amp;#39;s so cheap.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393404&quot; title=&quot;How many million graduate students do you need to give the US the military hegemony and political influence over allies and adversaries that the F-35 program provides ? Looked at from a policy maker&amp;#39;s viewpoint, things look very different.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue these military investments are necessary for global hegemony and trade stability, others contend that recent geopolitical events and the rise of inexpensive drone technology have diminished the effectiveness of traditional high-cost defense programs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393500&quot; title=&quot;Wouldn&amp;#39;t take very many at all, we&amp;#39;ve now learned these past four years (and even the past 2 months). All you need are drones, that are pennies on the dollar cheaper than trillion-dollar militaries. Depending on the munition, a single bomb we drop on Iran could cost between $40,000 and a couple million dollars. Think of all the high-end drones you could buy instead. Everything is changing. Including our influence.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393678&quot; title=&quot;That isn&amp;#39;t really accurate, small drones are enough to antagonize regional neighbors. They are far from being able to project influence, stabilize international trade, or even remotely protect a territory from an enemy that isn&amp;#39;t concerned with civilian casualties.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393445&quot; title=&quot;If we have military hegemony, then why can&amp;#39;t we open the strait of Hormuz?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48394248&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; project influence, stabilize international trade, or even remotely protect a territory from an enemy that isn&amp;#39;t concerned with civilian casualties. We just failed to do all of those things quite visibly. Iran made a choice not to escalate to destroying desalination capabilities and that&amp;#39;s why a lot of Saudis and Emiratis are still alive.  It&amp;#39;s not because we protected them.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/institute/recursive-self-improvement&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;When AI Builds Itself: Our progress toward recursive self-improvement&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (anthropic.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48400842&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;410 points · &lt;strong&gt;541 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by meetpateltech&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic reports that AI is rapidly accelerating its own development, with Claude now authoring over 80% of the company&amp;#39;s code and demonstrating superhuman performance in research optimization, signaling a potential shift toward autonomous recursive self-improvement and the need for global safety coordination. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/institute/recursive-self-improvement&quot; title=&quot;Title: When AI builds itself    URL Source: https://www.anthropic.com/institute/recursive-self-improvement    Markdown Content:  For most of AI’s history, humans drove every step in its development cycle. But at Anthropic, we are delegating a growing share of AI development to AI systems themselves, which is speeding up our work.    Taken far enough, and given enough compute, that trend points to an AI system capable of fully autonomously designing and developing its own successor. This is called…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Anthropic claims significant progress in recursive self-improvement, users report a sharp decline in service reliability, characterized by frequent outages and restrictive API throttling &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48402393&quot; title=&quot;Okay, so anthropic has amazing AI which supposedly writes most of their code and can continuously improve... meanwhile they have outages on a regular basis, and any kind of long-running work will now consistently hit &amp;#39;API Error: Server is temporarily limiting requests&amp;#39;. Not sure of this is intentional to force a reduction of token usage, but at this point I need to build around these throttling limits and outages with my own tools to restart/resume sessions. From my experience, in the last 2…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that the company&amp;#39;s inability to build efficient software—noting that their terminal tool consumes over 1GB of RAM due to overengineering—undermines their claims of AI-driven productivity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48403655&quot; title=&quot;Infrastructure is a much harder problem. They can&amp;#39;t even improve Claude Code, which eats 1GB+ of RAM. Meanwhile, my editor only consumes 80MB of RAM.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48403708&quot; title=&quot;I find any and all claims like this ridiculous from a company who can&amp;#39;t build a terminal application that uses less than a gigabyte of RAM.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48404562&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; For each frame our pipeline constructs a scene graph with React then &amp;gt; -&amp;gt; layouts elements &amp;gt; -&amp;gt; rasterizes them to a 2d screen &amp;gt; -&amp;gt; diffs that against the previous screen &amp;gt; -&amp;gt; finally uses the diff to generate ANSI sequences to draw Yup. Overengineering.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, there is significant skepticism regarding the lack of tangible software breakthroughs outside of AI itself &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48405327&quot; title=&quot;What I can’t get over is that there have been exactly zero software breakthroughs since vibe coding started, other than vibe coding itself. Claude is amazing, that’s true. But if it was as amazing as this article implies, I’d expect some breakthrough outside of AI itself. Rewriting a Zig program in unsafe Rust? Not a breakthrough. Finding a bunch of security vulns? Maybe that’s sort of a breakthrough though it’s underwhelming and possibly just a net negative. But like if I rolled back to using…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, alongside ethical concerns that pursuing rapid self-improvement contradicts Anthropic’s stated commitment to AI safety &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48403957&quot; title=&quot;I fail to see how pursuing recursive self-improvement at full speed is compatible with Anthropic&amp;#39;s stated goal of AI Safety. If nukes were not invented yet, would it really be a good idea to build and sell them as fast as possible (in peace time, no less)? I am not cynical enough to believe that Anthropic&amp;#39;s warnings are pure marketing hype. Let&amp;#39;s hope that it is instead overconfidence or the result of too much time talking to their own chatbot.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48404481&quot; title=&quot;So, regardless of whether or not Anthropic CAN create a self improving AI.. does anyone else feel like they shouldn&amp;#39;t be allowed to? Or it at least needs to be strictly supervised..? Like, I don&amp;#39;t actually think Anthropic can make the singularity any time soon, but I think even AI boosters have to admit doing this is creating a society-wide danger for the benefit of a very very small number of already-rich people.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.cloudflare.com/voidzero-joins-cloudflare/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;VoidZero Is Joining Cloudflare&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.cloudflare.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48398055&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;608 points · 267 comments · by coloneltcb&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudflare has acquired VoidZero, the team behind the high-performance Oxc and Rolldown JavaScript tools, to integrate their unified development toolchain into the Cloudflare Workers ecosystem. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.cloudflare.com/voidzero-joins-cloudflare/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;voidzero.dev&amp;amp;#x2F;posts&amp;amp;#x2F;voidzero-cloudflare&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;voidzero.dev&amp;amp;#x2F;posts&amp;amp;#x2F;voidzero-cloudflare&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The acquisition of VoidZero by Cloudflare is viewed by some as a successful outcome for the Vite ecosystem &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48398558&quot; title=&quot;Big fan of Cloudflare and a bigger fan of vite. Probably one of the best outcomes for the latter.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, though others criticize the &amp;#34;friendly&amp;#34; framing of what is essentially a massive financial transaction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48398650&quot; title=&quot;I love how they always make it sound like this is by choice. &amp;#39;VoidZero is joining Cloudflare&amp;#39; As if they chose to do that. Yes, they agreed to it, but in the end it was just a huge financial transaction. But i guess &amp;#39;Cloudflare buys VoidZero&amp;#39; just sounds less friendly. Even though that is exactly what happened.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Commentators debate the sustainability of the modern dev-tool business model, questioning if investors are seeing significant returns or if the path to independent revenue was simply non-existent &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48399142&quot; title=&quot;So is the business model of these projects - 1. build a popular dev tool 2. aquire funding 3. hire great talent 4. pray for an aqui-hire that justifies the initial funding amount I wonder how the initial investors feel about the aqui-hire path... Must be a pretty nice sum for them to agree to it, or they saw that the path to any revenue was near impossible/non-existant&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48399547&quot; title=&quot;My guess is investors are getting a good return on investment so they are probably pretty happy.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48399648&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;ve raised over $16 million [0]. For a decent 3-5x return for that, they would need to have been acquired for around ~$50 million. For a team of 19 [1], thats around $2.5 million per employee for Cloudflare. Worth it? no idea [0] https://voidzero.dev/posts/announcing-series-a [1] https://voidzero.dev/about&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also notable skepticism regarding Cloudflare’s &amp;#34;hostile UX&amp;#34; and the increasing centralization of the web, leading to concerns about the future of independent open-source software &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48399308&quot; title=&quot;What do you like about Cloudfare? Do you like the centralization of the internet?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48399428&quot; title=&quot;These acquisition announcements always leave me uneasy. There’s a lot of hand waving, “nothing will change and our roadmap will stay the same!” but we can all do basic math and understand that’s not how business works. As an aside, I have to use Cloudlare at work and it’s a pretty awful experience for the medium sized org I’m at. “Hostile UX” is a common complaint. Maybe they should invest money in competing with Vercel on UX/DX instead of acquiring open source projects.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48398694&quot; title=&quot;I love Vite, when I don’t forget it exists in my projects. It took things that made you feel mentally deficient and made them almost zero-config. This news does not make me happy. Same with the news about Astro earlier this year. I know it must be good for the people how have made the projects (why else would they chose to do it?) but there is something in those acquisitions that makes me uneasy.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48398311&quot; title=&quot;Do we have any chance left of using software for our work without Big Tech behind it?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.fieggen.com/shoelace/secureknot.htm&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ian&amp;#39;s Secure Shoelace Knot&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (fieggen.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48397028&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;535 points · 204 comments · by mooreds&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ian&amp;#39;s Secure Shoelace Knot, also known as the Double Slip Knot, is a symmetrical tying method that creates a permanent double wrap to prevent laces from coming undone, offering twice the security of standard knots. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.fieggen.com/shoelace/secureknot.htm&quot; title=&quot;Title: Ian&amp;#39;s Secure Shoelace Knot    URL Source: https://www.fieggen.com/shoelace/secureknot.htm    Published Time: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 02:19:07 GMT    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: Knot (icon)](https://www.fieggen.com/shoelace/knots/ias0.png)    Also known as the _“Double Slip Knot”_, this is a secure shoelace knot with a simple, symmetrical method of tying. Cross two loops and pass them both through the “hole” in the middle. This is a shoelace knot that **won&amp;#39;t come undone** on its own!    NOTE: This…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many users report that switching from a &amp;#34;granny knot&amp;#34; to a balanced shoelace knot—often by simply reversing the direction of the starting knot—permanently solved issues with laces coming undone &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48398538&quot; title=&quot;I only realized in my 30s that I had been tying my shoelaces wrong my whole life and a super minor change in my method has changed them from coming undone multiple times per day (unless double knotted), to instead staying tied the whole day with just a standard shoelace knot [0] (also on Ian&amp;#39;s site). This article&amp;#39;s web page actually has the essential note: &amp;gt; NOTE: If your finished knot comes out crooked (eg. loops pointing heel-to-toe), it&amp;#39;s probably because you tie your Starting Knot the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48399665&quot; title=&quot;Learning this has also changed my life, but maybe not for the better. Now every time I see someone I know and their shoes are tied in a granny knot I have to waste a bunch of calories deciding if they&amp;#39;d appreciate me telling them.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that knot failure is actually a result of poor-quality, inelastic laces &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48400412&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; coming undone multiple times per day (unless double knotted) You have bad laces. I thought this too before I tried different laces. Turns out different tensions and elasticities give different strengths of knots. For example I have some military boots which came with slightly stretchy laces. They NEVER come undone, ever. They were the first pair that switched me on to this, and since then I have always bought laces with slight stretch to them, and the knots always stay done up. In contrast…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others advocate for the &amp;#34;Ian Fast Knot&amp;#34; as a superior alternative &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48398846&quot; title=&quot;I use Ian&amp;#39;s (Fast) Knot and that&amp;#39;s good enough for me. https://www.fieggen.com/shoelace/ianknot.htm&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights Ian’s website as a &amp;#34;canonical example of the good internet&amp;#34; for its lightweight, durable, and ad-light design &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48400171&quot; title=&quot;I always use this site as a canonical example of The Good Internet. The kind of site that is rare today but used to be most of the internet, and we&amp;#39;re all worse off for the change. Lightweight handmade HTML and CSS. Very little JavaScript. The site is fast as hell, instant transition between pages, it&amp;#39;d make a React SPA blush. The URLs don&amp;#39;t change. The navigation is familiar and unchanging. Back button works as expected. Bookmarks into the site don&amp;#39;t break. It costs him almost nothing to run,…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the thread branched into a debate over lens care, with some insisting on specific microfiber techniques to avoid scratches &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48403226&quot; title=&quot;Use a clean microfiber cloth. ANYTHING ELSE will scratch your lenses up. (This is probably the most common no-no I see. People will clean their glasses with anything on them and smudge/scratch them instead.) Two cloths are ideal: one for cleaning and another for polishing. If you&amp;#39;re using soap and water, apply a tiny amount of soap onto both sides of the lens --- less than a grain of rice --- then apply water and rub with your fingers until clean. Skip to polish step. If using cleaner, spray…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt; while others claim cotton shirts or simple dish soap and water are sufficient &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48403464&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know why people say this. When I wore glasses I cleaned them with my cotton shirts for over a decade and they didn&amp;#39;t get scratched up, at all. I don&amp;#39;t see how cotton would scratch glass to begin with.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48403664&quot; title=&quot;Maybe this isn&amp;#39;t proper, but, what I do is wet them, rub them with a tiny amount of dish soap, then rinse them under the hot water tap. Then blow the droplets off both sides and let the rest air dry.  We have soft water here, so no water spots.  No rubbing dry with any kind of cloth.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://electrek.co/2026/05/20/in-a-first-wind-solar-generated-more-power-than-gas-globally-april-2026/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Wind and solar generated more power than gas globally in April 2026&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (electrek.co)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48399332&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;383 points · 350 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In April 2026, wind and solar power combined to generate 22% of global electricity, surpassing gas generation for the first time. According to Ember data, these renewables produced a record 531 terawatt-hours, driven by rapid capacity growth in major markets like China and the UK. &lt;a href=&quot;https://electrek.co/2026/05/20/in-a-first-wind-solar-generated-more-power-than-gas-globally-april-2026/&quot; title=&quot;In a first, wind and solar generated more power than gas globally in April 2026    Wind and solar generated more electricity than gas globally for the first time ever in April 2026, according to new Ember data.    [Skip to main content](#main)    Toggle main menu    [Electrek Logo Go to the Electrek home page](https://electrek.co/)     Switch site    * [9to5Mac Logo9to5Mac](https://9to5mac.com/)  * [9to5Google Logo9to5Google](https://9to5google.com/)  * [9to5Toys](https://9to5toys.com/)  * [Drone DJ…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the growth of renewables is celebrated as a cost-effective milestone &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48400496&quot; title=&quot;Solar/wind is the cheapest form of power generation by far. You just can&amp;#39;t beat it because they don&amp;#39;t have any fuel costs. Gas peaker plants will always make sense until we have enough grid scale batteries. They will hold on for now until the price of natural gas hits rock bottom. But with the current advances in low cost battery technology I see them becoming less and less necessary. They would probably already be dead if hydrofracturing hadn&amp;#39;t propped up the cost of gas.…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48399674&quot; title=&quot;Even so, the article says it grew 8% YOY in the US. The best is to hope that this is an unstoppable trend so that even politicians won&amp;#39;t be able to reverse it.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, commenters emphasize that these figures refer specifically to electricity rather than total energy, noting that gas remains critical for heating, industrial processes, and transportation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48400325&quot; title=&quot;This is exciting news but the term power here should really be replaced with electricity which is clarified early on in the article. Electricity only accounts for roughly 20-25% of all power / energy used and the vast majority of the remaining 75% is fueled by gas (cars, ships, heating, construction, ect.)&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48400249&quot; title=&quot;*electricity  .  Gas is heavily used for heating , cooking &amp;amp; industrial uses (e.g. drying agriculture like hops, boilers etc). I raise this point since policymakers get confused and try to ban gas, only to realize how critical gas is for food &amp;amp; industrial applications that consumers enjoy after the fact.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents argue that solar and wind offer a significant competitive advantage for energy-intensive sectors like AI and manufacturing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48399459&quot; title=&quot;Renewable energy offers a competitive advantage for any energy intensive activity  --- like manufacturing or AI. China gets it, the USA doesn&amp;#39;t.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, though some express concern over the environmental impact of clearing forests and farmland for large-scale installations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48400351&quot; title=&quot;I am against it for one reason only, but it&amp;#39;s very solvable, IMO, and it&amp;#39;s the amount of space they take up. I live next to 200+ acres of solar farms. A part of me cries a little when I see so much beautiful land and trees cut down and these lifeless panels taking up so much space. We have so many buildings, and structures already (think parking decks, tops of apartments, homes, offices, even parking lots) that we could put these, but instead we cut down acres of trees or use up perfectly…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the transition, coal remains a dominant global power source &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48400390&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a good news but I didn&amp;#39;t expect that coal is still on the 1st place and not really trending down. I though coal was largely replaced by gas years ago...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, and gas continues to play a vital role as a flexible &amp;#34;peaker&amp;#34; source until grid-scale battery technology matures further &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48399770&quot; title=&quot;I know some people who are adamantly against solar and wind (personally I like both but I can see some shortcomings - for example I have heard that ai datacenters are using gas at times because of its flexibility) So what are some of the best talking points to &amp;#39;sell&amp;#39; solar and wind to the unconvinced? Or will they just adopt it once it&amp;#39;s seen everywhere?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48400496&quot; title=&quot;Solar/wind is the cheapest form of power generation by far. You just can&amp;#39;t beat it because they don&amp;#39;t have any fuel costs. Gas peaker plants will always make sense until we have enough grid scale batteries. They will hold on for now until the price of natural gas hits rock bottom. But with the current advances in low cost battery technology I see them becoming less and less necessary. They would probably already be dead if hydrofracturing hadn&amp;#39;t propped up the cost of gas.…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rozumem.xyz/posts/16&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The desperation of NYTimes&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (rozumem.xyz)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48401965&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;345 points · 295 comments · by rozumem&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A new subscriber criticizes The New York Times for sending a mandatory 14-day series of onboarding emails that lack an unsubscribe option, arguing that such aggressive marketing tactics reflect desperation and damage the brand&amp;#39;s reputation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rozumem.xyz/posts/16&quot; title=&quot;Title:     URL Source: https://rozumem.xyz/posts/16    Markdown Content:  # The Desperation of NYTimes - rozumem&amp;#39;s weblog    [← back](https://rozumem.xyz/)    12 hours ago    # The Desperation of NYTimes    I recently got suckered into subscribing to NYTimes because I wanted to read an article behind a paywall and I couldn&amp;#39;t find an easy and quick alternative. I didn&amp;#39;t mind the $2.00 a month. But I took offense to what happened after I paid.    Over the course of the next 5 days, they sent me 5 onboarding…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hacker News users are sharply divided over the *New York Times*, with critics labeling their business practices &amp;#34;predatory&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;unethical&amp;#34; due to historical difficulties in canceling subscriptions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48402173&quot; title=&quot;NYTimes is predatory on subscriptions. Over my long lifetime I&amp;#39;ve subscribed twice, and regretted it both times with intensity. Any place that allows easy instantaneous subscription by a simple web form, but makes you call and talk to a person during limited business hours for cancellation , is a toxic place. I&amp;#39;ve been told they have stopped this predatory practice due to some newly passed laws or something, but they did not stop their predation due to their own values. I urge everyone reading…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48402778&quot; title=&quot;I live in California, cancelled about five years ago, and they forced me to talk to a person who demanded a reason for my cancellation, and then argued with me about wanting to cancel. Do not subscribe to the NYTimes. Use your library card, if one must read it, and unfortunately  as the undeserved &amp;#39;paper of record&amp;#39; one must often read it to be kept aware of what others are being fed. There&amp;#39;s no baby here to throw out with the bath water, I find other places have far better coverage for all the…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users report that canceling has become a simple online process in recent years &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48402703&quot; title=&quot;Any place that allows easy instantaneous subscription by a simple web form, but makes you call and talk to a person during limited business hours That hasn&amp;#39;t been true for, what, almost ten years? When I cancelled three months ago, it was about three or four clicks through the beg screens, and done. No, I don&amp;#39;t live in CA.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others remain frustrated by persistent &amp;#34;anti-patterns&amp;#34; such as unremovable app-promotion modals and the presence of ads for paid subscribers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48402522&quot; title=&quot;The UX anti-pattern of theirs which really grinds my gears is the &amp;#39;Continue reading in the app -- it&amp;#39;s better.&amp;#39; modal which appears when reading articles on the web. There does not seem to be a way to permanently opt out of it. I&amp;#39;m sure I could use GreaseMonkey or whatever to dismiss it for me but I mostly read articles on my phone, which makes any of that harder. The larger point, though, is that I shouldn&amp;#39;t have to! I&amp;#39;m already paying for your service, please let me use it the way I want to.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48402488&quot; title=&quot;I was a subscriber and stopped simply because they have ads in the app. I could look past the slowness of the app than what a webpage could deliver but ads in articles for paid subscribers? Cancelled it.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these grievances, some find the journalism&amp;#39;s value outweighs the marketing friction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48402282&quot; title=&quot;I respect your opinion but am grateful for and find tremendous value in my NYT subscription. I share it with my SO and read their articles constantly. Prior to getting a subscription I was a &amp;#39;turn js off&amp;#39; kind of person - which is fine I suppose and still do it for other sites.  I do not maintain any streaming or other subscriptions outside of Deezer (and a Garmin GPS FWIW).  I would like a Bloomberg subscription but to only read Matt Levine cannot justify the cost. To supplement other news…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, while others suggest bypassing the paywall entirely by using library card access &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48402230&quot; title=&quot;You can subscribe with your library card and get access to all NYTimes (games/crosswords too). One caveat is the subscription &amp;#39;rental&amp;#39; is for only a 3 day period, so you have &amp;#39;renew&amp;#39; your subscription every 3 days. This only takes 2 clicks though. For San Francisco public library: https://ezproxy.sfpl.org/login/nyt .&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kasra.blog/blog/i-spent-1500-seeing-if-llms-could-hack-my-app/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I built a vulnerable app and spent $1,500 seeing if LLMs could hack it&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (kasra.blog)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48392343&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;383 points · 209 comments · by jc4p&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Security researcher Kasra spent $1,500 testing various LLMs&amp;#39; ability to exploit a vulnerable React Native app, finding that GPT-4o (referred to as 5.5) and DeepSeek-V3 (v4-pro) were the most effective at identifying and exploiting a common Firebase misconfiguration. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kasra.blog/blog/i-spent-1500-seeing-if-llms-could-hack-my-app/&quot; title=&quot;Title: I built a vulnerable app and spent $1,500 seeing if LLMs could hack it    URL Source: https://kasra.blog/blog/i-spent-1500-seeing-if-llms-could-hack-my-app/    Markdown Content:  As a part of my work I do security research for various apps and websites. I wanted to see if LLMs could reproduce a common class of exploits I’ve found in multiple apps.    I made a fake React Native app in Expo and a backend in Python. It’s a book review app and the goal is to find a flag in a user’s private…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a growing frustration with Anthropic&amp;#39;s increasingly restrictive guardrails, which users argue hinder legitimate security work and mundane tasks like fixing a food processor &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48392551&quot; title=&quot;One interesting takeaway is the low score on Anthropic models from this benchmark. It’s not because of capability, it’s because Anthropic’s guardrails prevented it from solving the problem. I noticed with each model release Anthropic constrains the model more security wise. Its propensity to refuse doing legitimate work has been increasing. It now puts up more resistance around performing logins, handling credentials on behalf of the user, etc. For myself, it’s already gotten to the point where…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48394791&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, it has been in foraging. Requests that Claude has refused me: - What are popular free streaming sites used in China? - How do I bypass the safety   mechanism on my food processor (it’s broken) - What are nerve agents and how do they work (for a layman)? - Help me decompile some code - Help me make a design system similar to XYZ - Here is an API token, please do X (I can’t do that! Rotate the secret immediately! I refuse!) In some cases I can trick it with prompting, but in many cases it is…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest these constraints are a precursor to &amp;#34;professional&amp;#34; tier upsells that verify user credentials, others warn this creates an exclusionary guild system where AI vendors unilaterally decide who is allowed to practice security &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48392929&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Eventually I’ll reach a point where I am forced to choose between the useful aspects of the model and the limiting ones instead of just picking the most capable model out there No, the choice will be whether or not to to upgrade to &amp;#39;Claude Security Professional&amp;#39; or whatever they want to brand it as. What look like tightening &amp;#39;constraints&amp;#39; today are just setting up the upsell opportunities of tomorrow.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48394292&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;What look like tightening &amp;#39;constraints&amp;#39; today are just setting up the upsell opportunities of tomorrow. on the one hand agree, but on the other hand think it&amp;#39;s reasonable in that they can then verify the person allowed to purchase access to that model is in fact a Security professional and should be allowed to do stuff like crack security.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48394346&quot; title=&quot;So, supposing it&amp;#39;s true that these models completely change the security field and humans are ~obsolete other than as pilots guiding them what to crack, you think it&amp;#39;s reasonable that Anthropic and OpenAI should unilaterally determine who gets to be a security professional? I hope you do understand that is what you are suggesting.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48394842&quot; title=&quot;Why should anyone get to determine that? Do people really want us to move to an exclusionary guild system? I thought the experience with proprietary versus open source over the past 30 years had driven home the point that closed ecosystems are almost always far worse for security.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics also point out the futility of many refusals, noting that the blocked information is often readily available on public platforms like Wikipedia &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48394885&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; What are nerve agents and how do they work (for a layman)? On the one hand I can appreciate the wisdom of not serving up certain easily abused knowledge on a silver platter. On the other, that prompt (and far worse) is more or less directly answered by Wikipedia&amp;#39;s summary of the subject at which point what purpose could the refusal possibly serve? Perhaps Wikipedia shouldn&amp;#39;t list off the precise chemical compositions of various hand grenades as well as various synthesis methods for each of…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://aoav.org.uk/2026/military-experts-or-arms-industry-insiders-uk-media-fails-to-disclose-defence-sector-links-in-nearly-60-of-cases/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;UK media fails to disclose defence sector links in nearly 60% of cases&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (aoav.org.uk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48395938&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;365 points · 199 comments · by XzetaU8&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A report by Action on Armed Violence reveals that nearly 60% of retired UK military officers featured as media experts are not disclosed as having financial or commercial links to the defense industry, potentially masking conflicts of interest when they advocate for increased military spending. &lt;a href=&quot;https://aoav.org.uk/2026/military-experts-or-arms-industry-insiders-uk-media-fails-to-disclose-defence-sector-links-in-nearly-60-of-cases/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Military experts or arms industry insiders? UK media fails to disclose defence sector links in nearly 60% of cases    URL Source: https://aoav.org.uk/2026/military-experts-or-arms-industry-insiders-uk-media-fails-to-disclose-defence-sector-links-in-nearly-60-of-cases/    Published Time: 2026-06-03T12:25:17+00:00    Markdown Content:  ## **Executive summary**    ![Image 1](https://aoav.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/94aa5864-202c-4ce6-bc93-8387120c4ade-2-700x394.jpg)    _This report reveals how…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided over whether the &amp;#34;defense sector&amp;#34; label is accurate or a biased euphemism for the &amp;#34;arms&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;war&amp;#34; industry &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48396104&quot; title=&quot;1. Calling it the &amp;#39;defense sector&amp;#39; is already quite biased. Almost all of that sector&amp;#39;s activity involves offensive activity. Or just call it the &amp;#39;arms industry&amp;#39; etc. If we were less charitable, we could well call it the &amp;#39;war industry&amp;#39;. 2. Reading the article we note there&amp;#39;s quite some overlap between arms industry links and links to Israel&amp;#39;s fundraising and lobbying circles. I wonder whether UK media discloses those links.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48396207&quot; title=&quot;The UK doesn&amp;#39;t have some imperialist policy of land grabs like Russia, or diplomacy through violence. In the current Iranian war the UK is only allowing it&amp;#39;s bases to launch defensive missions, i.e. strike offensive capability or incoming missiles. So no, it is in fact the defense sector. What countries have a defense sector, if the UK doesn&amp;#39;t?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that former military personnel are naturally qualified to comment on security issues &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48396399&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; These individuals had also been quoted, featured, or otherwise used as commentators in UK media coverage of defence, conflict, or national security issues. If they are promoting defence spending or plugging their employers products that&amp;#39;s bad, but using their experience to comment on the Iran war or Ukraine, or Russian/Chinese Spy networks doesn&amp;#39;t seem that bad?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48396593&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;People who have seen the state of the military first hand are saying that we need to fund the military&amp;#39; is not really shocking or sinister.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that the majority of these undisclosed experts are specifically lobbying for increased military spending &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48396487&quot; title=&quot;In 17 of the 19 detailed instances, it is stated that they are promoting increases in budgets and spending.  The two others are reported as speaking with different conflicts of interest.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. The lack of transparency appears concentrated in specific right-leaning outlets like *The Telegraph* and *The Mail*, though there is debate over whether the UK&amp;#39;s historical and modern military actions qualify as imperialist or purely defensive &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48396207&quot; title=&quot;The UK doesn&amp;#39;t have some imperialist policy of land grabs like Russia, or diplomacy through violence. In the current Iranian war the UK is only allowing it&amp;#39;s bases to launch defensive missions, i.e. strike offensive capability or incoming missiles. So no, it is in fact the defense sector. What countries have a defense sector, if the UK doesn&amp;#39;t?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48396239&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The UK doesn&amp;#39;t have some imperialist policy of land grabs It has centuries of exactly that at a global scale, and continued post-war neo-colonial land grabbing and pressuring, plus eager participation in all the imperialist games of its larger brother. I mean, just mentioning &amp;#39;Tony Blair&amp;#39; is enough...&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48396826&quot; title=&quot;It is interesting to look at the details and see who the (news) &amp;#39;media&amp;#39; are in this case.  Going through the details, I find 1 instance (under Kemp) of the BBC, and everyone else is the &amp;#39;usual suspects&amp;#39;, the Telegraph , the Mail , GB News , the Sun , the Times , and so forth. The Guardian is only mentioned in context of exposing these conflicts of interests; and whilst I am surprised to find LBC and Nation Cymru as not being transparent about their experts and commentariat, I don&amp;#39;t see The…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48396288&quot; title=&quot;What land did Tony Blair grab? You can disagree with the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq without making the exaggerated claim that this was part of some kind of long-term imperialist occupation. The UK currently has fewer military personnel in Iraq than it has in, say, Germany. And Britain doesn’t control the Iraqi government.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.france24.com/en/culture/20260604-french-iranian-author-marjane-satrapi-author-of-persepolis-dies-at-56&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;French-Iranian author Marjane Satrapi, author of &amp;#39;Persepolis&amp;#39;, dies at 56&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (france24.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48397233&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;421 points · 118 comments · by fidotron&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Marjane Satrapi, the acclaimed Franco-Iranian author and director of the Oscar-nominated graphic novel and film &amp;#34;Persepolis,&amp;#34; has died at age 56, reportedly from &amp;#34;sadness&amp;#34; following the death of her husband last year. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.france24.com/en/culture/20260604-french-iranian-author-marjane-satrapi-author-of-persepolis-dies-at-56&quot; title=&quot;Title: Marjane Satrapi, French-Iranian author of &amp;#39;Persepolis&amp;#39;, dies of &amp;#39;sadness&amp;#39; at 56    URL Source: https://www.france24.com/en/culture/20260604-french-iranian-author-marjane-satrapi-author-of-persepolis-dies-at-56    Published Time: 2026-06-04T08:00:58+00:00    Markdown Content:  Franco-Iranian author and film director Marjane Satrapi, renowned for her graphic novel and film &amp;#39;Persepolis&amp;#39;, has died aged 56, a year after the passing of &amp;#39;the love of her life&amp;#39;, a member of her close circle said on…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Readers of *Persepolis* praise Satrapi’s brutal honesty in depicting her own &amp;#34;self-indulgence&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;minor self-destruction&amp;#34; during her exile in Europe, though some find the second half of the memoir jarring or even &amp;#34;stretch[ing] credibility&amp;#34; compared to the more relatable first half &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48398023&quot; title=&quot;I always enjoyed the first half of Persepolis. Told from Satrapi&amp;#39;s perspective, it was a very relatable story about a young child who was swept up by the world events around her, and tried to rebel in very normal, child-like ways. It was very relatable in that abstract sense, even if most of us have not been through a violent revolution. (and even more violent subsequent war with a neighboring state) The second half of Persepolis was much more difficult for me, and I never know how to feel…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48398638&quot; title=&quot;I’ve always wondered how much of the second part is truth and how much is fiction. That a teenage girl from Iran, living by herself in Central Europe with essentially no local connections, would become a drug dealer to her classmates, and on top of that somehow be let off the hook for it by the headmaster, stretches credibility a little bit.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48398930&quot; title=&quot;That’s a rather uncharitable take on what the poster you’re responding to wrote. I read Persepolis a few years ago, and it’s hard not to come away with a similar impression. The first part often does resemble a fairy tale of sorts, while the second part is a pretty dark story of teenage alienation. The contrast is jarring, and it goes well beyond “duh nobody’s perfect”. Both parts are excellent in their own right, and quite unlike any other book I’ve read, but there is indeed something strange…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters view this shift as a disappointing departure from the &amp;#34;likable&amp;#34; protagonist of the first book, others argue this reaction stems from a Western preference for &amp;#34;hero&amp;#39;s journey&amp;#34; myths over realistic depictions of trauma and alienation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48398023&quot; title=&quot;I always enjoyed the first half of Persepolis. Told from Satrapi&amp;#39;s perspective, it was a very relatable story about a young child who was swept up by the world events around her, and tried to rebel in very normal, child-like ways. It was very relatable in that abstract sense, even if most of us have not been through a violent revolution. (and even more violent subsequent war with a neighboring state) The second half of Persepolis was much more difficult for me, and I never know how to feel…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48398825&quot; title=&quot;Do all stories need to be of virtue and success? It seems like you&amp;#39;re disappointed it wasn&amp;#39;t a modern &amp;#39;noble savage&amp;#39; myth, that it was realistic instead of a fairy tale about a person coming from a bad place to a good place and being happy, wholesome, and free. This kind of mythology is a pretty big problem in the western world right now as is the kneejerk reaction to it.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48399369&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s jarring to many people is it isn&amp;#39;t the three act hero&amp;#39;s journey of a noble savage.  The &amp;#39;something&amp;#39; going on is that it isn&amp;#39;t a copy of just about the only narrative in western mythos: 1. Departure - from a humble background the subject leaves amid struggle 2. Growth and Initiation - the subject discovers who they are building themselves into the hero they&amp;#39;ll become 3. Heroic Return - the now hero makes a return to their beginnings to great success Instead, Persepolis is a much more…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the discussion touches on France&amp;#39;s historical role as a cultural hub for the Middle East, noting that unlike the UK or US, France lacked the &amp;#34;bad blood&amp;#34; that might have deterred Iranian exiles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48397773&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s the connection with France? Even Khomeini was in exile in France until the shah was deposed.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48397953&quot; title=&quot;France was historically very interested in the Near and Middle East, though colonially somewhat less successful than the UK; Napoleon sailed to Egypt in 1799, and later the French Republic protected Lebanese and Syrian Christians, up to some point in history. People from the Levant still like to study in France (incl. Nassim Nicholas Taleb). Hence, France is considered a strong and culturally developed country in the region. And unlike the UK and US, they had no historic bad blood with Iran…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-04/s-p-dow-jones-keeps-megacap-ipo-rules-as-is-after-consultation&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SpaceX, Other Mega IPOs Denied Fast Index Entry by S&amp;amp;P&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bloomberg.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48405718&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;357 points · 160 comments · by tristanj&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;S&amp;amp;P Dow Jones Indices has rejected proposals to fast-track mega-cap IPOs like SpaceX into the S&amp;amp;P 500, maintaining its strict 12-month seasoning period and profitability requirements for new listings. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-04/s-p-dow-jones-keeps-megacap-ipo-rules-as-is-after-consultation&quot; title=&quot;Title: SpaceX, Other Mega IPOs Denied Fast Index Entry by S&amp;amp;P    URL Source: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-04/s-p-dow-jones-keeps-megacap-ipo-rules-as-is-after-consultation    Published Time: 2026-06-04T21:56:19.668Z    Markdown Content:  # SpaceX, Mega IPOs Denied Fast S&amp;amp;P 500 Index Entry - Bloomberg    [Skip to content](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-04/s-p-dow-jones-keeps-megacap-ipo-rules-as-is-after-consultation#that-jump-content--default)    [Bloomberg the Company…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely support the decision to maintain existing entry requirements, arguing that indices should remain slow-moving to protect passive investors from the volatility and &amp;#34;downside risk&amp;#34; of unproven mega-IPOs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48406651&quot; title=&quot;This seems a sensible thing to do. If you change the rules on how things end up on your index, you force everyone using that index to reevaluate it. Your index is now perceived as more volatile (and probably is), and all the finance people need to reevaluate the risk of their index funds and decide if it is now &amp;#39;growth&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;high growth&amp;#39; or whatever bucket it belongs in based on the new risk profile. And then all the portfolios need to be rebalanced. Which all takes time, more time than was being…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48407914&quot; title=&quot;Good. Indexes are supposed to be slow-moving,  precisely due to their entry requirement of sustained profitability that skews towards mature companies. All that an inclusion of these new companies would accomplish is a bailout of  their stockholders by pension funds and ETFs where millions of regular people shoulder all the downside risk. SpaceX and OAI stock will be available through Robinhood, Questrade and all the other retail investor markets. Individuals can make an informed choice to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48407370&quot; title=&quot;The market cap of the S&amp;amp;P 500 according to Google is ~$65T. Anthropic, OpenAI and SpaceX could well amount to $4T+ in market cap. That&amp;#39;s ~6% of the entire index. It&amp;#39;s like adding another NVidia. That&amp;#39;s a big deal. The rules around index inclusion exist for a reason. Too much control in one person&amp;#39;s hands (which SpaceX has), too small a float (so you don&amp;#39;t get price discovery), lack of a history of financial performance and minimal trading days just don&amp;#39;t give investors confidence and, like it…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some contend that excluding massive companies like SpaceX undermines the S&amp;amp;P 500&amp;#39;s role as an accurate market benchmark &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48407056&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; What&amp;#39;s the urgency to bend the rules? If you’re buying into a tech-marketed fund like the NASDAQ 100 and it doesn’t include a large chunk of the tech market, you’re no longer passively investing in tech. You’re investing in an actively-managed fund. Historically, companies like SpaceX would have gone public earlier and grown into the index. Recognizing that has changed with multiple $1+ trillion IPO contenders makes sense; as it turns out, I think both NASDAQ and S&amp;amp;P decided correctly.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48407963&quot; title=&quot;On a fundamental level, the S&amp;amp;P 500 index is meant to be a benchmark of the market. Journalists, policymakers, investment managers, politicians, regular investors, everyone I know all use the S&amp;amp;P 500 as the benchmark of the US stock market. If a significant percentage of the market is excluded from the index because they don&amp;#39;t meet index inclusion criteria, then then index stops being a useful benchmark.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others emphasize that the rules exist to ensure price discovery and prevent forced purchasing by pension funds before a company has established a history of profitability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48407914&quot; title=&quot;Good. Indexes are supposed to be slow-moving,  precisely due to their entry requirement of sustained profitability that skews towards mature companies. All that an inclusion of these new companies would accomplish is a bailout of  their stockholders by pension funds and ETFs where millions of regular people shoulder all the downside risk. SpaceX and OAI stock will be available through Robinhood, Questrade and all the other retail investor markets. Individuals can make an informed choice to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48407370&quot; title=&quot;The market cap of the S&amp;amp;P 500 according to Google is ~$65T. Anthropic, OpenAI and SpaceX could well amount to $4T+ in market cap. That&amp;#39;s ~6% of the entire index. It&amp;#39;s like adding another NVidia. That&amp;#39;s a big deal. The rules around index inclusion exist for a reason. Too much control in one person&amp;#39;s hands (which SpaceX has), too small a float (so you don&amp;#39;t get price discovery), lack of a history of financial performance and minimal trading days just don&amp;#39;t give investors confidence and, like it…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, the consensus is that these companies are not banned but simply must grow into the index by meeting the same standards as their predecessors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48407027&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s the urgency to bend the rules? It is not like SpaceX is banned for good. It will be included as soon as it meets the requirements.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48407056&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; What&amp;#39;s the urgency to bend the rules? If you’re buying into a tech-marketed fund like the NASDAQ 100 and it doesn’t include a large chunk of the tech market, you’re no longer passively investing in tech. You’re investing in an actively-managed fund. Historically, companies like SpaceX would have gone public earlier and grown into the index. Recognizing that has changed with multiple $1+ trillion IPO contenders makes sense; as it turns out, I think both NASDAQ and S&amp;amp;P decided correctly.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://economist.com/business/2026/06/03/american-capitalism-has-taken-an-apocalyptic-turn&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;American capitalism has taken an apocalyptic turn&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (economist.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393043&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;173 points · &lt;strong&gt;317 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by andsoitis&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;American capitalism is increasingly influenced by millenarian thinking, as apocalyptic anxieties and &amp;#34;end of the world&amp;#34; fears begin to permeate modern business strategies and financial markets. &lt;a href=&quot;https://economist.com/business/2026/06/03/american-capitalism-has-taken-an-apocalyptic-turn&quot; title=&quot;Title: American capitalism has taken an apocalyptic turn    URL Source: https://economist.com/business/2026/06/03/american-capitalism-has-taken-an-apocalyptic-turn    Published Time: 2026-06-03T19:28:52.869Z    Markdown Content:  # American capitalism has taken an apocalyptic turn    [![Image 1: The Economist](https://marber-cdn.economist.com/foundations/latest/images/brand-identifiers/the-economist/signature-red.svg) ![Image 2: The…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current economic climate is described as &amp;#34;ominous,&amp;#34; with users drawing parallels to the pre-2008 housing bubble and even the social instability preceding the French Revolution &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393636&quot; title=&quot;I would say with inflation, wealth inequality and skyrocketing housing, gas and grocery prices as well as super high amounts of consumer debt and families stretching to keep up it feels a lot like pre-bust 2005/2006 economy out there right now.  We might not be on the cusp of a subprime mortgage bank crisis but it does feel ominous lately.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393625&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Perhaps the danger is not 2008, 1999, 1973 or even 1873, but 1789. 1789 was the year of the French Revolution [1]. The rest are years with financial crises. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Revolution&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that extreme wealth inequality is inherently harmful because it shrinks the average person&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;share of the pie&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393912&quot; title=&quot;Walter, I believe the idea against wealth inequality is not purely that there are wealthier people but that their wealth should be redistributed such that the wealthier people are less wealthy (but still wealthier) and the poorer people are less poor (but still poorer).&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393911&quot; title=&quot;Let me address the second part. If we define wealth as it&amp;#39;s often used colloquially -- the amount of liquid cash one has -- then your potential share of the pie of goods and services shrinks. This is true unless the pie itself grows proportionately. Without agreeing or disagreeing with parent comment, the rate of growth of the pie certainly does not feel like it is growing as fast as accumulation of nominal wealth of some. Historically one usually amassed monetary wealth in exchange of…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that historical attempts at redistribution have consistently left everyone worse off &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48394014&quot; title=&quot;There have been many attempts at taking from the rich and giving to the poor, and the result was always everybody was worse off except the people who ran the government.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Disagreement exists regarding the possibility of a modern uprising; some believe the surveillance state and elite mobility make revolution impossible &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393826&quot; title=&quot;The French Revolution is no longer possible. The surveillance state plus wealth mobility means the wealthy will be in New Zealand before anyone erects a guillotine, and the people that would foment a revolution are heavily surveilled and infiltrated.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, while others suggest that asymmetric technologies like drones have leveled the playing field &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393869&quot; title=&quot;Are you sure about that? Tech cuts both ways &amp;amp; asymmetric drone warfare has become cheaper than ever … how hard it is it to sink some yachts or down some jets?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.buchodi.com/meta-glasses-facial-recognition/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Meta&amp;#39;s ships facial recognition on smart glasses&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (buchodi.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48403588&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;265 points · 220 comments · by buchodi&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Security researchers discovered that Meta&amp;#39;s smart glasses companion app contains a fully functional, dormant facial recognition pipeline capable of identifying people and storing biometric fingerprints, though the feature is currently gated and not active for standard users. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.buchodi.com/meta-glasses-facial-recognition/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Meta&amp;#39;s smart glasses companion app ships a complete, dormant face-recognition pipeline on a stock account.    URL Source: https://www.buchodi.com/meta-glasses-facial-recognition/    Published Time: 2026-06-04T17:09:58.000Z    Markdown Content:  04 Jun 2026    Stella is the companion app for Meta&amp;#39;s smart glasses. Inspecting version `273.0.0.21` of the Android build (`com.facebook.stella`), I found the entire computational and storage stack for on-device facial recognition: three face models, a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The deployment of facial recognition on smart glasses has sparked intense privacy concerns, with some users advocating for a &amp;#34;second-amendment-like&amp;#34; right to personal surveillance tech to counter government and corporate overreach &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48404251&quot; title=&quot;The tech&amp;#39;s there. The genie can&amp;#39;t be put back in the bottle, and it will only get cheaper and more invasive. Only question we have any control over is... do we want everyone to have it, or only govs and corps? There&amp;#39;s a second-amendment-like argument here, imo, that is very hard to push back on - because at least this stuff doesn&amp;#39;t kill people. I want every cop to be surrounded by five or six recording devices that they don&amp;#39;t control at all times - it&amp;#39;s the least worst option. (Obviously I&amp;#39;m…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While the technology offers significant accessibility benefits for those with prosopagnosia (face blindness), there is a strong consensus that these tools should function offline to prevent Meta from tracking personal interactions and locations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48404225&quot; title=&quot;I wish something like this existed that was completely offline.  I&amp;#39;m face blind (prosopagnosia) so being able to feed an offline database photos of friends so it can recognise them would be great. Accessibility shouldn&amp;#39;t require giving up privacy.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48404161&quot; title=&quot;Another case of really cool tech done badly. Imagine a world in which you could use facial recognition, have an instant summary in front of you you reminding you of someone&amp;#39;s birthday, the names of their kids ... Then imagine that it wasn&amp;#39;t tracked, recorded, saved, or tied into anything at all. Just a useful service, in service to only you. Thanks Meta et al, for pushing forward with this broken (for people) model of business and ensuring we&amp;#39;ll never be able to have that.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48404527&quot; title=&quot;Like the poster, I&amp;#39;m faceblind. It isn&amp;#39;t the worst thing: I&amp;#39;m not voice blind, height blind, age blind, hairstyle blind, gender blind, features associated with race and ethnicity blind, attractiveness blind, affect blind, context blind, etc., so I&amp;#39;m mostly good at figuring out who someone is. Within one encounter with a bunch of people, I try to note what someone is wearing. Every once in a while I don&amp;#39;t recognize someone and I go through this whole thing of bringing up every biographical…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue the devices are &amp;#34;public spyware&amp;#34; that should be socially stigmatized or banned in professional settings to protect confidential information &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48404044&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m in the position to make security policies at work, and one of them is that no smart glasses are allowed in the office. We will not be having workers aiming Facebook glasses at our screens showing confidential information. And along those lines, I can think of damn few scenarios where I&amp;#39;d be OK with someone using face recognition against me. Restaurants? It&amp;#39;s not Facebook&amp;#39;s business to know where I like to eat, presumably to sell ads to show to me. Music clubs? They don&amp;#39;t need to know what I…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, especially as users find ways to disable recording indicators &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48404166&quot; title=&quot;To make matters worse, I’ve seen threads where people with these glasses discuss how to circumvent/disable the “now recording” light, so people won’t know when they’re active.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/anthropics/defending-code-reference-harness&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Anthropic&amp;#39;s open-source framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48403980&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;355 points · 108 comments · by binyu&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic has released an open-source reference framework that uses Claude to autonomously discover, triage, and remediate software vulnerabilities. The harness provides a customizable pipeline for threat modeling, scanning code in sandboxed environments, and generating verified patches for identified security flaws. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/anthropics/defending-code-reference-harness&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - anthropics/defending-code-reference-harness: Skills for threat modeling, scanning, triage, patching, plus an autonomous scanning harness you can /customize    URL Source: https://github.com/anthropics/defending-code-reference-harness    Markdown Content:  A reference implementation for autonomous vulnerability discovery and remediation with Claude, based on our learnings from [partnering with security teams at several organizations](https://www.anthropic.com/glasswing) since…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters describe Anthropic’s framework as a &amp;#34;shop jig&amp;#34;—a specialized tool that is often more effective when custom-built by individual developers to fit their specific workflows rather than used as a generalized product &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48404547&quot; title=&quot;The thing about things like this is that they&amp;#39;re shop jigs. You can buy a crosscut sled if you really want to, but most woodworkers just make their own. It was a different situation 2 years ago, when there was significant cost to building your own harness (but then: you probably weren&amp;#39;t doing AI vuln research 2 years ago). Today, I think your best bet is to look at something like this for ideas, and then just ask for your own, to fit your own work style, with your own interface, your own notion…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48404915&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Shop jigs&amp;#39; is a great way to put it. I think a lot of software has gone from being made for general use to extremely individualised use. Before the Age of AI, it took so much human effort to write something that solved your problem that you might often go the extra mile so that others could re-use it. Now, it takes almost no effort, so the software stays ungeneralised. Some of the incentive has changed, I think. Most of the time I no longer share the things I&amp;#39;ve been building[0] because, for…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48404896&quot; title=&quot;As a woodworker, it’s a really nice analogy and beyond anything I’ve seen AI do.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While security is viewed as an ideal use case for LLMs, there is a consensus that securing code may require an order of magnitude more tokens than writing it, leading to significant operational costs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48404175&quot; title=&quot;I wonder how much this thing costs to run. https://github.com/anthropics/defending-code-reference-harne... says: &amp;gt; As a rough guideline, expect ~10K uncached input tokens/min and ~2K output tokens/min per agent. You can scale parallelism up to your account&amp;#39;s ITPM limit (roughly 10 agents per 100K ITPM). My guess would be hundreds of dollars with Opus and thousands of dollars with Mythos.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48404249&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s becoming apparent that it requires more tokens to secure code than it does to write it May even be an order of magnitude more&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48404398&quot; title=&quot;In all seriousness, wasn’t that always the case? Writing bad code is relatively cheap. Ensuring code isn’t bad is the expensive part.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Some participants question why models cannot simply be trained to output secure code by default, while others suggest that developers should maintain personal, portable libraries of these AI harnesses to enhance their long-term productivity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48405597&quot; title=&quot;Unless it is very specific to a proprietary product, craftspeople take their jigs with them from job to job, building up a personal library over a career. As a software developer I&amp;#39;ve always had a well-tuned IDE and shell config in a safe place. Something I think about a lot is what is the equivalent for the software builders of today using AI tools? how do make these harnesses exportable and portable? You might think employers would be against this; make it more costly to leave. But I actually…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48404516&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s weird because why can&amp;#39;t they train the AI to simply output secure code? The basic security flaws with regards to input validation and overflows should never ever be output by an AI. For &amp;#39;security flaws due to bad design&amp;#39; I&amp;#39;ll cut them slack until AGI is achieved.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://havenweb.org/2026/05/28/retro-tech.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Retro-Tech Parenting&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (havenweb.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48400588&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;278 points · 185 comments · by mawise&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A technologist parent advocates for &amp;#34;retro-tech&amp;#34; solutions like physical media, landline telephones, and restricted family computers to provide children with digital independence while avoiding the predatory patterns of modern surveillance capitalism and engagement-optimized feeds. &lt;a href=&quot;https://havenweb.org/2026/05/28/retro-tech.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Haven Blog: Retro-Tech Parenting    URL Source: https://havenweb.org/2026/05/28/retro-tech.html    Published Time: Thu, 28 May 2026 19:56:12 GMT    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: A photograph taken on a wooden tabletop showing a collection of retro-tech items including a CD player, a stack of CDs and a wired telephone](https://havenweb.org/assets/images/retro.jpg)    I am a technologist. I enjoy the things that computers and digital devices can do–they often seem magical and amazing! As a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Proponents of &amp;#34;retro-tech&amp;#34; parenting emphasize using non-algorithmic tools like landlines, offline laptops, and CD players to foster curiosity without the overstimulation of modern devices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48402228&quot; title=&quot;Some of the things my wife and I have provided for our kids: - lots of bookcases with probably &amp;gt;1500 books (including lots of kids/picture books) - what we&amp;#39;ve collected over the years - a family laptop (2012 MacBook Pro) with no internet connection, pre-loaded with Pages, Sheets, Affinity Photo/Designer, a few small games, and some coding tools (Python, Ruby, VSCode, Scratch, etc.). - Lego Spike and Spike Prime robotics learning sets (with software on an iPad, no internet) - an upright piano…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48402244&quot; title=&quot;As someone who grew up in the 90&amp;#39;s, I think seeing the live progression of tech was really helpful for my own understanding. For instance we saw: - CDs moving to Mp3s moving to the ipod and finally streaming - Games moving from 8bit to early 3d graphics to where they are today - Family computer moving to laptops and eventually to ipads - Landlines to early cell phones to the iphone today All of these experiences helped ground the core principals behind this technology. And the pace of these…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48401689&quot; title=&quot;Useful reframe: it&amp;#39;s not old vs. new tech, it&amp;#39;s tools you command vs. media that commands you. &amp;#39;Retro&amp;#39; correlates with &amp;#39;good for kids&amp;#39; mostly because old tools aren&amp;#39;t engagement-optimized — they sit there until the kid acts. A modern non-algorithmic tool can be just as good. What a dumbphone doesn&amp;#39;t solve is the social tax — opting a kid out of the addictive layer can also opt them out of the group chat. That&amp;#39;s the actually-hard part.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that recreating a &amp;#34;tech history&amp;#34; helps children understand core principles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48402244&quot; title=&quot;As someone who grew up in the 90&amp;#39;s, I think seeing the live progression of tech was really helpful for my own understanding. For instance we saw: - CDs moving to Mp3s moving to the ipod and finally streaming - Games moving from 8bit to early 3d graphics to where they are today - Family computer moving to laptops and eventually to ipads - Landlines to early cell phones to the iphone today All of these experiences helped ground the core principals behind this technology. And the pace of these…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others warn that withholding smartphones in high school can lead to social isolation and logistical difficulties in a world where peers no longer use landlines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48402995&quot; title=&quot;This is great, but it&amp;#39;s also easy to go too far in this direction. This can work through elementary school and into middle school, but I don&amp;#39;t think it works in high school. It&amp;#39;s really hard to be a high school student without your own phone. I know some people who have kept their kids from having phones into high school. It avoids some of the addictive and distracting issues that come from having phones at a young age, but it&amp;#39;s way more isolating than people realize. You might have a landline,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48403156&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think enough parents have internalized that if they&amp;#39;re the &amp;#39;I don&amp;#39;t let my teenager have a phone&amp;#39; parent in 2026, that also means they&amp;#39;re the &amp;#39;I don&amp;#39;t let my teenager have friends&amp;#39; parent.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these challenges, some parents have successfully fostered community by setting up neighborhood PBX systems to encourage safe, independent communication among children &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48402597&quot; title=&quot;I set up a little neighbourhood pbx this year on an oracle cloud always free instance. Took a couple of days. Any family can buy a WiFi-enabled office phone and I’ll set up an extension for them. It’s working great! My six year old had a 15 minute chat with classmate while we were making dinner today; they have arranged a play date for next Monday. A couple of weeks ago a 5 year old invented prank calls. Every now and then the phone will ring and we’ll pick up and she’ll sing a a couple of…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://uruky.com/?il=en&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Uruky (EU-based Kagi alternative) now has Image Search and URL Rewrites&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (uruky.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48396004&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;221 points · 198 comments · by BrunoBernardino&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;EU-based search engine Uruky has introduced image search and URL rewrites while announcing plans to transition toward a source-available licensing model for its codebase. &lt;a href=&quot;https://uruky.com/?il=en&quot; title=&quot;You can get a 2h free trial by solving a proof-of-work captcha when topping up your account for the first time.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;If you&amp;amp;#x27;d like to learn more, an independent interview was posted a couple of weeks ago [1], and the FAQ [2] has a lot of information as well.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;For the source code sharing, we&amp;amp;#x27;ve talked with lawyers and are inclined to no longer require the NDA&amp;amp;#x2F;NCC for privacy reasons shared with us before (signing requires identification), but instead use a source-available…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the ethics of using search engines that rely on Yandex, with some users refusing to support the service due to its ties to the Russian government and the ongoing conflict &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48396899&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d be more than willing to subscribe and support the project BUT, I need to address the elephant in the room: The reason why I&amp;#39;m against Kagi is the fact that they use Yandex(be it only for images according to their own words) and I&amp;#39;m sure as hell refusing to give a single cent to them. So I guess my question is: sources?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48397727&quot; title=&quot;I also don&amp;#39;t use Kagi because of Yandex, and my reason is that it&amp;#39;s a Russian company, owned by people close to the Russian government.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48397004&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s Russian. Indirectly you are supporting Putin when you use it. Those sanctions aren&amp;#39;t for no reason.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. This sparked a debate over whether boycotting Russian companies is consistent or fair compared to the practices of American tech giants &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48397058&quot; title=&quot;But is Yandex government owned? What about Russians abroad that send money back home to their families, and a percentage of that ends up going via taxes to Putin? Are we boycotting all Russians everywhere globally?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48397001&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s wrong with Yandex? I think every possible criticism of  Yandex I can think of could just as easily be leveled at Google or Bing.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48397190&quot; title=&quot;Americans too, or just Russians?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48397361&quot; title=&quot;I see. To summarize, you believe all Russians are bad because a Russian person killed your friend and all Americans are good because no American people killed any of your friends?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond political concerns, users suggested that Uruky needs to prioritize UI/UX design, local widgets, and family plans to compete effectively with Kagi and Google &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48396511&quot; title=&quot;I really like the idea and that it&amp;#39;s eu-made a love it. A fee things I see with kagi which are useful and improvements: - Hire a UI/UX person NOW! My parents and gf like using google and kagi because are easy to use. - add the widgets like the football or the show the local store with the phone number asap. My gf is thinking about moving away from kagi because of this. - the quick ai response is extremely useful. - Indexing websites is super important. People doesnt know where to put the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48396805&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Uruky is a private search engine focused on personalization &amp;gt; - Indexing websites is super important. People doesnt know where to put the content in a website or how to make accessible. Many times i use google due to this fact. Is there a way to build a search engine that doesn&amp;#39;t involve either building or accessing a index somehow? I&amp;#39;m not sure what you&amp;#39;re trying to say here, is this for the website builders or for the users, who the &amp;#39;indexing of websites&amp;#39; is super important? The &amp;#39;people…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lego.com/en-us/product/sagrada-familia-21065&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sagrada Família Lego set&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lego.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48400918&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;185 points · 151 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LEGO has announced a new Architecture Sagrada Família set, which will become the company&amp;#39;s largest building kit to date with 12,060 pieces. The $799.99 model features detailed facades and stained-glass effects, with pre-orders scheduled to ship starting November 1, 2026. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lego.com/en-us/product/sagrada-familia-21065&quot; title=&quot;Title: Sagrada Família 21065 | Architecture | Buy online at the Official LEGO® Shop US    URL Source: https://www.lego.com/en-us/product/sagrada-familia-21065    Markdown Content:  # Sagrada Família 21065 | Architecture | Buy online at the Official LEGO® Shop US    [Skip to main content](https://www.lego.com/en-us/product/sagrada-familia-21065#main-content)    [Report an accessibility issue](https://www.lego.com/service/email-us/details/LEGO%20Company/LEGO%20Company%2FOther)    [Go to our accessibility…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters debate whether modern Lego sets have lost their &amp;#34;spirit,&amp;#34; with some arguing that specialized pieces and complex instructions turn them into static display pieces rather than creative toys &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48402195&quot; title=&quot;Once built, what does one do with this? Generally, these are fragile in the sense that moving them can cause parts of it to become disconnected or fall apart so you don&amp;#39;t want to be moving it around to much. It&amp;#39;s going to take up a whole lot of space. Your kids can&amp;#39;t actually play with it. And if you intend to show it off, you aren&amp;#39;t really showing any real skills except for the ability to follow pages and pages of instructions. I don&amp;#39;t even want to think about what would be involved in…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48402020&quot; title=&quot;When I was a kid I used to spend entire days building and creating new stuff once I built the designs from the booklets. Today when I see a Lego kit is kind of another toy: is designed to build one and only one design, compared to the generic kits that were sold and also popular many years ago. All these new kits pieces are just to accomplish one build. The Lego spirit of ever combining and creating with same pieces over and over again is gone.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest these sets are merely expensive dust-collectors, others maintain that kids still integrate specialized parts into imaginative &amp;#34;free-builds&amp;#34; once the original model inevitably breaks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48402111&quot; title=&quot;My kids have a ton of legos, it&amp;#39;s their favorite thing. However, and this is the important part: you have to let go of the concept of a set. Keep new assembled kits out, let them play with it as built from the instructions. But then as it falls apart with play, and the kids don&amp;#39;t fix it the same way it was originally built, it eventually goes into a big box of former kits that are all jumbled together. We did this, and without prompting to do so, the kids started building their own things out…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48402221&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; When I was a kid I used to spend entire days building and creating new stuff once I built the designs from the booklets. Kids still do this. I don&amp;#39;t know why this idea persists. There have always been sets with custom pieces. My kids go crazy over the custom pieces because it sparks new ideas for their other builds. My kids know every custom piece from every set they&amp;#39;ve ever built and will describe them in great detail so we can search through the bin until we find it. &amp;gt; The Lego spirit of…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. To mitigate high costs and storage issues, some users recommend alternative brands or subscription services that allow for building and returning sets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48403004&quot; title=&quot;somebody outta make a cheaper affordable lego alternative its a god damn crime what lego is getting away with&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48402461&quot; title=&quot;In Germany there is a Lego subscription service. Put sets on a wishlist, they send you one of them. You build it, unbuild it and send it back. One set a month.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/how-we-contain-claude&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The ways we contain Claude across products&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (anthropic.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48392082&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;222 points · 95 comments · by jbredeche&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic details its engineering strategies for containing Claude agents, using sandboxes, virtual machines, and egress controls to limit the &amp;#34;blast radius&amp;#34; of potential failures across its claude.ai, Claude Code, and Cowork products. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/how-we-contain-claude&quot; title=&quot;How we contain Claude across products    Anthropic is an AI safety and research company that&amp;#39;s working to build reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems.    [Skip to main content](#main-content)[Skip to footer](#footer)    * [Research](/research)  * [Economic Futures](/economic-futures)  * Commitments  * Learn  * [News](/news)    [Try Claude](https://claude.ai/)    [Engineering at…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on Anthropic’s risk-reward framing, with some viewing the acceptance of higher potential harm as a cynical &amp;#34;cost of doing business&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48392688&quot; title=&quot;The framing they use is hilarious and their little graphic is perfect. The risk of harm doesn&amp;#39;t go down, but the reward goes up, so the harm just becomes the cost of doing business, justified by the reward. So as the reward gets higher and higher, the amount of harm they&amp;#39;re willing to justify goes up. Feels like society in a nutshell.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48396825&quot; title=&quot;Everything you do a risk/reward equation, you just don&amp;#39;t usually see it drawn out quite so starkly. Getting out of bed in the morning carries a risk that you&amp;#39;ll trip and crack your head on the floor. Crossing a road carries a risk of being hit by a bus. Eating food carries a risk of choking on it. The same is true in computer security. The only truly secure computer is one you don&amp;#39;t turn on, and even that carries some risk of an attacker breaking in and stealing the storage from it. Whether you…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt; while others argue that scaling operations naturally allows a business to absorb individual failures that would otherwise be ruinous &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48392844&quot; title=&quot;Sure. You start a PC repair business. At first, losing a stick of RAM or frying someone&amp;#39;s motherboard is super costly when you are doing 10 a week. But once you&amp;#39;re doing 1000, that&amp;#39;s pretty damn good and easily covered. When you have more tools, velocity, and whatnot, the proportions change.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48394643&quot; title=&quot;I think the point is that at small scale a single accident poses a risk of ruin to your small operations.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Skeptics suggest these safety narratives are &amp;#34;fan fiction&amp;#34; designed to hype model capabilities ahead of an IPO &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393248&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m intensely skeptical about anything Anthropic says, because they are so incented to make their products seem dangerous (i.e., &amp;#39;capable&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;science fiction&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;ahead of everyone&amp;#39;) ahead of their IPO. And they&amp;#39;ve done it before. Remember the whole &amp;#39;when threatened, the model would use an engineer&amp;#39;s email to blackmail him about his affair&amp;#39; nonsense?  That was just fan fiction.  They simply created a scenario with some facts and asked their model to continue the story.  Go ask Claude about ways to…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, arguing that LLMs lack the &amp;#34;movie logic&amp;#34; required to autonomously cause real-world havoc &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393201&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;As agents grow more capable, so does their potential blast radius. The engineering question is how to cap it. People get a bit upset these days when you personify an LLM, but worse than that I think is to pretend that LLMs work on some movie logic where they can sneak out on to the internet like some kind of ooze and begin replication.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. To mitigate the &amp;#34;lethal trifecta&amp;#34; of AI agent risks, some users suggest physical isolation, such as running agents on dedicated cheap hardware or VPS instances to strictly limit the blast radius &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48392876&quot; title=&quot;Yeah I was thinking about Simon Wilson&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;lethal trifecta&amp;#39;[0] in the context of OpenClaw style &amp;#39;general purpose&amp;#39; AI agents, where people just gave it access to their full hard drive, gmail account, etc. I was thinking you can&amp;#39;t make the chance of catastrophic failure zero (we still hear about &amp;#39;Claude deleted my home folder&amp;#39;), but you can definitely limit the blast radius. You can&amp;#39;t get the risk to zero. But the opportunity cost of not playing the game is rising. So you accept some level of…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.404media.co/google-employees-internally-share-memes-about-how-its-ai-sucks/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Google employees internally share memes about how its AI sucks&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (404media.co)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48400311&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;154 points · 103 comments · by elorant&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Despite CEO Sundar Pichai’s claim that 75% of Google&amp;#39;s new code is AI-generated, employees are reportedly sharing internal memes criticizing the technology for being overhyped and making their work more difficult. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.404media.co/google-employees-internally-share-memes-about-how-its-ai-sucks/&quot; title=&quot;Google Employees Internally Share Memes About How Its AI Sucks    Google’s CEO says 75% of the company’s code is AI-generated. The people who write that code say the AI they’re using is overhyped.    ###### Account    * [Log in](/signin/)  * [Subscribe](/signup/)    ###### Navigation    * [Home](https://www.404media.co)    * [About](https://www.404media.co/about/)  * [RSS](https://www.404media.co/404-media-now-has-a-full-text-rss-feed/)  * [Support/FAQ](https://www.404media.co/faq/)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely dismiss the report as a &amp;#34;nothingburger,&amp;#34; noting that Google’s internal &amp;#34;Memegen&amp;#34; culture has historically mocked every aspect of the company and serves as a standard feedback loop &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48401096&quot; title=&quot;(ex-Googler, spent 18 yrs there) Memegen is a key part of the culture. Its default mode is over-the-top mocking, of course, with a grain of truth. Nobody and nothing is spared. C-level execs, products, the perf process. So this by itself is not quite the scoop 404 media thinks it is. You could take the front page of memegen on any given day and construct twenty scandalous headlines of it.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48400715&quot; title=&quot;Excel users complain about using Excel still [1]. They even make memes about it! Some of them work at Microsoft! 404media, please, take a deep breath. Your jobs are safe, your trauma is valid. Your corruption coverage is so good, but this &amp;#39;employees make memes&amp;#39; editorial decision-making is exposing some deep insecurity I can&amp;#39;t quite triangulate. [1]: https://www.demilked.com/excel-humor-memes/&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48400678&quot; title=&quot;“We encourage our engineers to vigorously test and critique our internal tools; that candid feedback loop, even via our internal meme generator, is vital to how we build technology,&amp;#39; Google said. &amp;#39;We continue to refine our internal tools based on employee feedback to ensure we are delivering the best experience that maximizes daily productivity.” Can anybody comment on whether that statement is an accurate reflection of how management at google treats these memes?  On surface level it seems…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48401146&quot; title=&quot;What a nothingburger&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that all current AI has flaws &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48400667&quot; title=&quot;All AI sucks, it&amp;#39;s not a Google problem.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others point to specific technical frustrations with Gemini’s fragmented product plans and restrictive usage limits compared to competitors like Claude or Codex &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48400776&quot; title=&quot;I do wonder why Gemini/Antigravity is so behind Codex and Claude. They have it all, TPUs, the model is okay, but then its scattered across a dozen product plans, names, limits. I feel like they are spread thin. Gemini CLI was atrocious. It&amp;#39;s now being shuttered to AG but its very hard to use due to the limiting usage constraints Claude is better and Codex remains king of actual usage you can get.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the mockery, some users maintain that integrating AI into workflows provides a significant competitive edge regardless of current shortcomings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48400793&quot; title=&quot;Disagree and if you actively use it in your workflow well you will realize its a major competitive edge. Nobody is going to hold you back from falling behind tho and I&amp;#39;m not here to convince you otherwise.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://momentsingraphics.de/Siggraph2026.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Gaussian Point Splatting&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (momentsingraphics.de)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48396792&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;185 points · 67 comments · by ibobev&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gaussian point splatting is a new stochastic rendering method that uses 64-bit atomics and parallel programming to render hundreds of millions of Gaussians in real time while maintaining visual fidelity to original Gaussian splatting. &lt;a href=&quot;https://momentsingraphics.de/Siggraph2026.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Gaussian Point Splatting    URL Source: https://momentsingraphics.de/Siggraph2026.html    Markdown Content:  Moments in Graphics    A blog by Christoph Peters    Joris Rijsdijk, Christoph Peters, Michael Weinnman, Ricardo Marroquim.      2026–07 in _ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH)_ 45, 4.    [Official version](https://doi.org/10.1145/3811272)    ## Abstract    We propose Gaussian point splatting, a stochastic method to render Gaussian splats that scales extremely well to scenes with many…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion explores the potential for Gaussian Splatting (GS) in gaming, with some users drawing parallels to historical ellipsoid-based rendering in *Ecstatica* or photorealistic environments in *Casebook* &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48397403&quot; title=&quot;It will be interesting to see the first AAA game that uses these methods instead of rendering a 3D world. Even if made from CGI worlds, it would be a very interesting approach and with somewhat predictable performances. Reminds me of Ecstatica [1], a 1994 game that had intense visuals with a very odd/different rendering engine made of 3D ellipsoids; in a way really crude splats in gouraud shading. [1] https://ecstatica.fandom.com/wiki/Ecstatica&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48397942&quot; title=&quot;Many years ago there was a game called Casebook[1], a small little detective game where you investigated rooms for clues. But unlike similar FMV games where you jumped from point to point, it had photorealistic environments that could be smoothly walk around in, much like later lightfield or gaussian splatting experiments. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-VAaC5BgVE&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. However, significant skepticism exists regarding AAA adoption due to the high rendering costs, lack of concrete surfaces for physics and lighting, and difficulties with deformations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48404791&quot; title=&quot;I know this comes up a lot on HN because its not primarily a graphics community but: 1. Gaussian Splats are very expensive to render. They capture a lot of detail which makes them seem cheaper than an equivalent raster render of that quality, but they wouldn&amp;#39;t meet real time AAA game performance requirements 2. Gaussian Splats don&amp;#39;t have a concrete surface. Want to cast shadows or do physics? It&amp;#39;s doable but very tricky. Want to relight them? Also tricky. What is the exact surface point that…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see GS as a promising tool for creating digital playgrounds for drone training or FPS environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48405074&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m working on the vision component of a drone racing stack. Could I use GS to render my living room as a digital playground to train my vision models in? I know nothing about the technology but the alternative is creating a 3d model of my living room which is also outside my skill-set.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48398426&quot; title=&quot;There was this FPS demo recently https://playcanv.as/p/qxGSuzYq/ People have also converted some small sections of Unreal 5 demos into splats https://superspl.at/scene/692c4f91 Or perhaps use a real world scan - it was suggested this one would make an ideal setting for zombies https://superspl.at/scene/6359774f&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others debate its technical novelty, comparing it to established stochastic point-cloud techniques and clarifying that its &amp;#34;millions of threads&amp;#34; refer to GPU-level execution &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48397234&quot; title=&quot;This feels like Monte Carlo rendering applied to rasterization. I&amp;#39;m wondering if it&amp;#39;s a brand-new or a well established methodology&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48396963&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; millions of threads Really?! What OSs can handle that many native threads? Also, this seems quite similar to stochastic progressive drawing of pointclouds for realtime that has been done for &amp;gt; 15 years in the VFX industry with GPU shaders in a tiled/bucketed fashion, unless this isn&amp;#39;t progressive maybe? (The fact it&amp;#39;s been accepted for Siggraph likely indicates it&amp;#39;s slightly different).&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48397000&quot; title=&quot;I believe they mean GPU threads. Plenty of cuda files in their repository.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-06-03</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-06-03</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c93x0k194yno&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Meta workers can opt out of being tracked at work up to 30 min&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48383220&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;712 points · 683 comments · by reconnecting&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meta is scaling back its plan to track employee keystrokes and mouse clicks for AI training by allowing workers to pause data collection for 30 minutes or request full exemptions following internal backlash. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c93x0k194yno&quot; title=&quot;Title: Meta scales back plan to track workers&amp;#39; clicks and keystrokes to train AI    URL Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c93x0k194yno    Published Time: 2026-06-03T10:46:30.694Z    Markdown Content:  # Meta scales back plan to track workers&amp;#39; clicks and keystrokes to train AI    [Skip to content](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c93x0k194yno#bbc-main)    Advertisement    [Watch Live](https://www.bbc.com/watch-live-news/)    [](https://www.bbc.com/)    Subscribe    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of AI-driven workplace surveillance is sparking fears of &amp;#34;draconian&amp;#34; tracking where robots categorize every employee action, a shift from the traditional norm of ignoring minor personal web-surfing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48383914&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s always been hard to know the extent of how draconian tracking actually is (IT pros tend to not talk about it much). In the US, there&amp;#39;s the expectation that when you use an employer-provided device that any and all activity on it can be fully monitored/recorded and used against the employee for any reason. In practice, however, few people worry about reasonable amounts web-surfing, being on hacker-news or doing life-activities on their work machines. Oh, here I am on hacker-news when I…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384361&quot; title=&quot;This is something that genuinely runs the gamut across different companies—plenty don&amp;#39;t even know the serial numbers of company-owned machines, never mind which devices individuals have, while others do effectively have live feeds of every employee&amp;#39;s screen available to managers at all times. In between you have many businesses that manage their devices but only insofar as to enforce some basic protection and reserve the right to investigate it in the case that something does go wrong. In…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue for a strict separation of personal and work devices to maintain privacy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48385617&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve always, throughout a 25+ year career, kept personal business on personal devices and work business on work devices, and never cross the streams. Oddly, this is really controversial on HN, though! I&amp;#39;ve gotten so many weirdly angry responses when suggesting people try it, like it&amp;#39;s a huge inconvenience to just bring a personal phone to work in order to do your banking and fuck around posting on HN. It&amp;#39;s so much easier now than pre-smartphone to keep worlds separate. There&amp;#39;s no reason my…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest that the high compensation and engineering challenges at companies like Meta justify the ethical compromises and invasive environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48383864&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t work for Meta, but how many more years do I need to work in tech? I&amp;#39;m in my 40s and my kids are young. I&amp;#39;ve already set up 529s for them, and am paying for some expensive home upgrades. Maybe when that is finished and I&amp;#39;ve built up a buffer I can switch industries for the last 5-10 years of my working life. Curious if anyone here has any similar plans.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384240&quot; title=&quot;There are tons of good reasons to work for Meta. You can work on interesting projects, build your resume and network, work on interesting engineering problems, learn from other people, and of course, they pay very well. People do need to support their family, secure their retirement and so on... Is it perfect? certainly not. Is the company toxic? where do you draw the line? how much are you willing to compromise given the other advantages you get?  Everybody has a different answer to these…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. This tension has led to calls for industry-wide unionization to establish ethical codes and block extreme monitoring &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384164&quot; title=&quot;I think we need to unionize, across companies. We need to be able to block stuff like this, and to be able to demand that you can’t lay off someone to replace them with AI (bringing US workers rights up to the bar set by China). We also need to be able to hold our leadership to some kind of code of ethics. I don’t want to work for a company that makes kill bots, or can renege on climate pledges.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, as critics argue that prioritizing high pay over social impact is what allows such toxic corporate cultures to persist &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48383922&quot; title=&quot;I have a serious question to anyone working at Meta and reading this: HOW can you still work at this company!? Why don&amp;#39;t you quit this very toxic company, and start working at another place or even on your own? I genuinely don&amp;#39;t understand... Let just Meta die!&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384563&quot; title=&quot;The number of people in these comments who would be happy to be &amp;#39;paid well&amp;#39; to contribute to what&amp;#39;s inarguably a huge net negative worldwide is exactly how the company got to this point. It&amp;#39;s astonishing how many people value a ton of money over doing something good. Everyone who talks about setting values aside for cash is the problem. Gross.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/technology/developers-tools/introducing-gemma-4-12b/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Gemma 4 12B: A unified, encoder-free multimodal model&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.google)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48385906&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;777 points · 314 comments · by rvz&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google has introduced Gemma 4 12B, an open-source, encoder-free multimodal model designed to run locally on laptops with 16GB of RAM while providing native audio and vision processing. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/technology/developers-tools/introducing-gemma-4-12b/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Introducing Gemma 4 12B: a unified, encoder-free multimodal model    URL Source: https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/technology/developers-tools/introducing-gemma-4-12b/    Published Time: 2026-06-03T16:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  Jun 03, 2026    3 min read    Gemma 4 12B is designed to bring high-performance multimodal intelligence directly to your laptop, combining mobile-first efficiency with advanced reasoning.    O    Olivier Lacombe    Director of Product Management, Google Deepmind    G    Gus…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of Gemma 4 12B has sparked technical debate over its &amp;#34;encoder-free&amp;#34; architecture, which replaces dedicated vision models like SigLIP with a lightweight embedding module &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386156&quot; title=&quot;The big story here is the encoder-free part, which I still don&amp;#39;t fully understand. &amp;gt; Vision: We replaced Gemma 4’s vision encoder with a lightweight embedding module consisting of a single matrix multiplication, positional embedding and normalizations. That&amp;#39;s technically encoding, just without using a dedicated model for it like SigLIP? The Developer&amp;#39;s Guide elaborates, it&amp;#39;s still a 35M layer which I am curious is robust enough. https://developers.googleblog.com/gemma-4-12b-the-developer-... &amp;gt;…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386229&quot; title=&quot;Totally agree that it is &amp;#39;encoding&amp;#39; in the general sense, but I think they are referring to the lack of an &amp;#39;encoder&amp;#39; neural network.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users found it capable of matching older GPT-4 performance in &amp;#34;vibe-coding&amp;#34; benchmarks, others noted it suffers from bizarre syntax errors and may not be optimized for coding compared to specialized small models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48387695&quot; title=&quot;I ran the Q4 quant (used with llama.cpp) though my &amp;#39;minesweeper&amp;#39; vibe-coding benchmark: https://senko.net/vibecode-bench/2026/minesweeper-gamma-4-12... The result is decent, but it had a few bizzare/trivial syntax errors I had to fix manually: it would do an extra closing bracket or paren a few times, and wanted to separate function definitions with comma. Not sure what that was about, but otherwise the output run just fine. So, with those qualifiers, I think it&amp;#39;s a decent local coding model.…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48390110&quot; title=&quot;It was almost certainly not trained for coding, as it&amp;#39;s got both audio and vision input, is only 12B, and nowhere in the announcement is coding mentioned. It will likely not have good performance on coding in general, compared to other small models like Qwen 3.6 35B A3B, Gemma 4 26B A4B, Nvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B, gpt-oss-20b. For 16GB laptops, Qwen 3.5 9B is the undisputed champ. Gemma 4 31B is the top dog at small model coding, but is dense so it needs ~48GB unified RAM for full context.…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also centered on hardware requirements, with users clarifying that &amp;#34;16GB&amp;#34; likely refers to VRAM, making local execution more accessible but still requiring premium consumer hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386156&quot; title=&quot;The big story here is the encoder-free part, which I still don&amp;#39;t fully understand. &amp;gt; Vision: We replaced Gemma 4’s vision encoder with a lightweight embedding module consisting of a single matrix multiplication, positional embedding and normalizations. That&amp;#39;s technically encoding, just without using a dedicated model for it like SigLIP? The Developer&amp;#39;s Guide elaborates, it&amp;#39;s still a 35M layer which I am curious is robust enough. https://developers.googleblog.com/gemma-4-12b-the-developer-... &amp;gt;…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48388742&quot; title=&quot;Either Google changed the text or you editorialised it a tiny bit - just for all others that got excited, they mean 16GB V RAM. So a premium graphics card requiring a &amp;gt;2500€ device is the minimum to run this. Still progress, but not quite democratic yet. Weird though that Google might be cannibalising it&amp;#39;s own AI subscription service?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48390945&quot; title=&quot;Models this small and this capable bode really well for the usefulness of a PC like the RTX Spark that Nvidia/Microsoft announced this week. 128GB of unified memory will likely be more than sufficient for effective local agentic coding, even if SOTA cloud models will still be even better. Up until this point, I&amp;#39;ve found the cost/value to unequivocally favor using a cloud subscription, but I would be lying if I didn&amp;#39;t worry that one day OpenAI is going to increase the price for my subscription…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Finally, commenters questioned Google&amp;#39;s strategic motive for releasing open models, suggesting it could be a mix of marketing, goodwill, or a hedge against competitors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386275&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s Google&amp;#39;s business case for releasing open models? Don&amp;#39;t get me wrong, I am grateful and appreciative of these releases. I&amp;#39;m trying to understand how it fits into their bigger picture as a for profit company? Are they not helping competitors build on the novel technology they have developed? Is it simply goodwill and/or marketing? Or am I missing something strategic?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jun/3/uber-caps-usage/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Uber&amp;#39;s $1,500/month AI limit is a useful signal for AI tool pricing&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (simonwillison.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48383056&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;432 points · &lt;strong&gt;541 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by pdyc&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Uber has implemented a $1,500 monthly spending cap per engineer on AI coding tools like Claude Code to manage rising operational costs and establish a benchmark for enterprise AI tool pricing. &lt;a href=&quot;https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jun/3/uber-caps-usage/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.bloomberg.com&amp;amp;#x2F;news&amp;amp;#x2F;articles&amp;amp;#x2F;2026-06-02&amp;amp;#x2F;uber-caps-usage-of-ai-tools-like-claude-code-to-cut-costs&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.bloomberg.com&amp;amp;#x2F;news&amp;amp;#x2F;articles&amp;amp;#x2F;2026-06-02&amp;amp;#x2F;uber-caps...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;ZrwAy&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;ZrwAy&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;)&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rapid adoption of AI coding tools has led some companies to authorize expenditures of up to $1,500–$5,000 per seat monthly, signaling a shift from viewing AI as a fad to a high-value enterprise asset &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48388309&quot; title=&quot;Why there are so many people that still believe that AI coding is a fad? It&amp;#39;s something that started less than two years ago and companies are already paying thousands per seat. I know one that gives you 5k per month. Which other tool went from nothing to this level of acceptance so quickly?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. However, there is significant debate over whether current token prices are artificially low due to subsidies or if they will continue to drop as a &amp;#34;depreciating commodity&amp;#34; while infrastructure debt rises &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48387965&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I noted that my own token usage comes to about $1,000/month against each of Anthropic and OpenAI - which currently costs me just $100 per provider thanks to their generous subsidized plans for individual subscribers. Do we know that AI providers are going to keep these per-token prices, or eventually lower them because of competition from China? Many lower-budget individuals are now moving to China open weight models like DeepSeek. I wonder if China&amp;#39;s really subsidising the providers, or if…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48388573&quot; title=&quot;One aspect Paul Kedrosky mentioned recently is the concept of „duration mismatch“. The price per token goes down over time (either because the AI vendor reduces due to competition pressure, or because customers are now incentivized to use older cheaper models). But datacenters are financed through debt, with the assumption their revenue increases over time. Quoting him: „[AI vendors are] paying for a fixed cost with a depreciating commodity“[0]. So you have on one end the token revenue trending…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48383583&quot; title=&quot;These are still at currently subsidized prices. We&amp;#39;ll see if they think they&amp;#39;re getting $1500/month of value when that buys significantly fewer tokens.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that these high costs may not be sustainable or justified, noting that AI-generated code often lacks foundational logic, creates more work for human reviewers, and could potentially be replaced by cheaper &amp;#34;flash&amp;#34; models or local hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48383618&quot; title=&quot;$1500/mo is $18,000/seat/annum. Maybe Microsoft and Nvidia are on to something. 128 GB machines that can run local LLMs are a bargain even if priced $5-8k.  Yes, tok/s is not quite there, but that&amp;#39;s probably OK since the bottleneck really isn&amp;#39;t the code; it&amp;#39;s WTF did Uber build with all of that spend?  How did it meaningfully impact their revenue in a positive direction?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48388912&quot; title=&quot;Because companies are betting that this spending will allow them to reduce cost by firing people. Right now the AI LLM PRs we&amp;#39;re seeing are just introducing more work for other people, while these so-called builders are looking good with their new dashboards and functionality they&amp;#39;re demoing. But you can&amp;#39;t talk to them about the flow of the code. You can&amp;#39;t ask them for their thinking as to why certain things are. It&amp;#39;s not built up from the ground with experience from x people taken into…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48383816&quot; title=&quot;How many more months do we need to wait, until big companies realize that flash models work just fine if you: 1) Don&amp;#39;t ask LLMs for big changes 2) Review everything and point them in the right direction Large models still suck at big changes, they produce questionable architecture and you still have to review the code, if your project is serious enough. The codebase quickly become a mess, if you don&amp;#39;t pay enough attention. Does not matter which model. So why bother with big models, when flash…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, while Chinese open-weight models offer a low-cost alternative, security concerns regarding data privacy may prevent their adoption by major US firms&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theatlantic.com/philosophy/2026/06/no-artificial-intelligence-is-not-conscious/687378/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Artificial intelligence is not conscious – Ted Chiang&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theatlantic.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48387270&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;341 points · &lt;strong&gt;599 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by lordleft&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Author Ted Chiang argues that artificial intelligence lacks true consciousness, asserting that large language models are sophisticated statistical tools rather than sentient beings with internal experiences. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theatlantic.com/philosophy/2026/06/no-artificial-intelligence-is-not-conscious/687378/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;web.archive.org&amp;amp;#x2F;web&amp;amp;#x2F;20260603173839&amp;amp;#x2F;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.theatlantic.com&amp;amp;#x2F;philosophy&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;06&amp;amp;#x2F;no-artificial-intelligence-is-not-conscious&amp;amp;#x2F;687378&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;web.archive.org&amp;amp;#x2F;web&amp;amp;#x2F;20260603173839&amp;amp;#x2F;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.theat...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.is&amp;amp;#x2F;bcpZl&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.is&amp;amp;#x2F;bcpZl&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether Ted Chiang’s dismissal of AI consciousness is based on a &amp;#34;deep misunderstanding&amp;#34; of how complex internal representations emerge from simple tasks like text completion &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48391605&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; My intention is to highlight the fact that LLM conversations are cleverly disguised examples of sentence continuation Regardless of bigger issues, this kind of statement reveals a deep misunderstanding. Problem type does not limit problem complexity. Nor does problem type limit solution complexity or power. If a machine has to learn to understand humans to complete text, then that is what it has to do. And there is no theoretical or practical basis for suggesting that this is somehow &amp;#39;faking&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393037&quot; title=&quot;When the consciousness itself not understood and well defined in the first place, it is pretty pointless to debate if something is or isn&amp;#39;t conscious.  And here in particular the reasoning behind the argument is bizarre. Decomposing the complex activity into simple steps like &amp;#39;predicting the next word&amp;#39; and claiming that surely can&amp;#39;t have consciousness. A similar argument would be -- there is no way that movements of electrons by tiny distance would produce consciousness.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that Chiang’s requirement for a physical body and biological-style survival instincts is an &amp;#34;uninspired&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;simplistic&amp;#34; metric that privileges biological intelligence over other potential forms of awareness &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48389685&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;So what context would cause me to seriously consider the possibility that engineers had created a computer program that is conscious and an intentional user of language? Let me outline one potential sequence of steps. The first requirement is that the computer program has a body (either physical or virtual) and sense organs; there are many reasons for this, but for the purposes of this discussion the most relevant one is the fact that without a body, a computer program could have no desires or…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48390100&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, it&amp;#39;s kind of mind boggling that Ted Chiang (of all people!) can&amp;#39;t imagine intelligence without a body. and the whole thing just begs a lot of questions. Is a car a body? Does an AI situated in a car therefore get to have desires and emotions? Is a taupe box with a webcam attached a body? (For that matter: Is a quadropelegic body a body? Do quadropelegics have desires and emotions? Obviously, yes and yes.) Why is a body necessary for the formation of desires and emotions? Why are desires…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48391175&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Yeah, it&amp;#39;s kind of mind boggling that Ted Chiang (of all people!) can&amp;#39;t imagine intelligence without a body. and the whole thing just begs a lot of questions. How can you have a subjective experience without a body? That&amp;#39;s the point, in my opinion: your physical/chemical state (body) in a given moment is then translated into the higher abstraction of the emotion. An emotion that *you* feel, because you are self aware of what&amp;#39;s happening. How can you be self aware without feeling? And how do…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, some participants suggest that consciousness is a poorly defined &amp;#34;social label&amp;#34; rather than a scientific property, making the debate a &amp;#34;category error&amp;#34; or a matter of &amp;#34;vibes&amp;#34; rather than empirical fact &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48391388&quot; title=&quot;I think about Star Trek: TNG’s “Measure of a Man” a lot lately.  We can be so confident to decide what is and isn’t alive from  vibes alone. The conclusion I’m currently at is that I don’t know and probably can’t ever know. Maybe you’re all philosophical zombies. Maybe I am one too! But at some point we will get close enough that it hopefully becomes obvious that we must tread carefully. The entire episode is incredibly relevant. But here’s a snippet:…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48388845&quot; title=&quot;Consciousness is a label like fat, smart, man, grumpy, cool. Like money, property, or the idea of a week, it&amp;#39;s something that we&amp;#39;ve loosely agreed to out of convenience, not because it&amp;#39;s some intrinsic property of the mind. It&amp;#39;s a useful label because it determines how we treat things - that&amp;#39;s fine. But insisting on searching for it is like searching for cognitive aether. It&amp;#39;s the social equivalent of phlogiston. Like all of these ideas, they exist in our heads as a map - a way of navigating…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48389357&quot; title=&quot;Suppose one selects an arbitrary hot-button issue [X] with two opposing sides and one side has anything less than overwhelming support. And then that person writes an article titled &amp;#39;Side 1 of issue [X] is true&amp;#39;. Not &amp;#39;maybe&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;possibly&amp;#39;. Just a straight-up declaration by fiat. Would you categorize this particular style of rhetoric to be persuasive or annoying? And before you say &amp;#39;persuasive&amp;#39; because you&amp;#39;re thinking about this specific issue regarding AI consciousness, consider many things in…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. A notable technical counter-argument posits that the immutability of current LLMs—their inability to learn or change through experience—precludes them from being truly conscious &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48390020&quot; title=&quot;The fact that a LLM is essentially immutable would be my biggest argument against consciousness or self-awareness. It&amp;#39;s a big file with a bunch of coordinates describing spatial relationships between tokens. When you give it a prompt, it uses those relationships to generate a string of tokens that is a statistically likely response to that prompt, then it stops. It&amp;#39;s not changed by the experience. It doesn&amp;#39;t remember anything. It doesn&amp;#39;t sit around thinking on its own. Even if the model itself…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48389276&quot; title=&quot;This makes sense. However there is an issue where many people conflate &amp;#39;consciousness&amp;#39; with the ability to make novel insights, think genuinely, etc. They use this to claim that since AI is not conscious, AI could never actually &amp;#39;think&amp;#39; and is instead just always a regurgitation of its training data. It is a natural human hubris to make our abilities seem unquantifiable and mysterious, but all the useful things the human brain does are just finding patterns in data, running lossy simulations,…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://elixir-lang.org/blog/2026/06/03/elixir-v1-20-0-released/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Elixir v1.20: Now a gradually typed language&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (elixir-lang.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48388324&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;672 points · 247 comments · by cloud8421&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Elixir v1.20 introduces a sound, gradual type system that performs type inference and checks for &amp;#34;verified bugs&amp;#34; without requiring manual type annotations. This milestone uses set-theoretic types and a unique `dynamic()` type to identify dead code and runtime-guaranteed errors while maintaining high performance and low false positives. &lt;a href=&quot;https://elixir-lang.org/blog/2026/06/03/elixir-v1-20-0-released/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Elixir v1.20 released: now a gradually typed language    URL Source: https://elixir-lang.org/blog/2026/06/03/elixir-v1-20-0-released/    Published Time: 2026-06-03T00:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  In 2022, [we announced the effort to add set-theoretic types to Elixir](https://elixir-lang.org/blog/2022/10/05/my-future-with-elixir-set-theoretic-types/). In June 2023, we [published an award winning paper on Elixir’s type system design](https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.06391) and said our work was…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The introduction of gradual typing in Elixir v1.20 has sparked debate over whether &amp;#34;retrofitted&amp;#34; type systems can match the quality of languages designed with types from the start &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48390549&quot; title=&quot;Maybe it is only my experience, but i feel that languages that were not typed since the begining never work as well as &amp;#39;true&amp;#39; typed ones.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48389948&quot; title=&quot;seems ironic that critics were saying, it needs typing, and all the elixir fans were saying you don&amp;#39;t need typing, you don&amp;#39;t get bugs related to typing because elixir is somehow magic, now they get typing and it finds bugs for them....    but you said you didn&amp;#39;t need that to prevent bugs?  But good to see! I spent a bunch of time trying out Elixir a while back, I enjoyed it, but just didn&amp;#39;t agree with the lack of types.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that untyped languages represent technical debt that eventually requires migration to typed systems for performance and scale &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48391731&quot; title=&quot;Honest question, in the era of vibe and AI assisted coding is there any advantages of using untyped programming languages, apart from the fact that non-typed languages has more traning data for the LLM? This probably controversial, but personally I consider untyped languages as technical debts that need to be fixed sooner or later, and the OP article is partly addressing this very issue. Rewriting critical software infrastructure (infostructure) to more reliable typed languages happened to most…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others maintain that Elixir’s ecosystem remains a powerful draw, particularly through Phoenix and LiveView &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48389340&quot; title=&quot;How does it compare to Gleam? Or rather, why use Elixir over Gleam now? I suppose Phoenix and Live View in particular are big draws to Elixir.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics point to a steep learning curve and the perceived inconvenience of managing both the Erlang/BEAM runtime and the Elixir language &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48389000&quot; title=&quot;Found elixir intriguing and so Phoenix. Two reasons I put it aside again are: You need Beam and the Elixir. I find that really weird, because I&amp;#39;m used to just the language like in Python, Java, C, Rust. Not something underneath it, too. There is no debugger. The way to debug Elixir is to print stuff to the console, like 40 years ago. No thanks.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48389114&quot; title=&quot;Read again... Here&amp;#39;s what you need to do for elixir: Download and run the Erlang installer  Download and run the Elixir installer Here for Java:  Download and run the Java SDK And for Python:  Download and run the Python installer&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, though proponents highlight the community&amp;#39;s helpfulness and the effectiveness of specific learning resources for overcoming these hurdles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48388690&quot; title=&quot;https://pragprog.com/titles/lhelph/functional-web-developmen... don&amp;#39;t let the title fool you - the first half of the book is just elixir over the past 8 years this is the book i&amp;#39;ve used to ramp back up on elixir and it works like a charm every time - i&amp;#39;ve never finished it for me, a mark of a good programming book in this tutorial-project style is that I have started it half a dozen times and never finished it because at some point before the end I&amp;#39;ve been equipped w/ the tools to go off and do…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48388617&quot; title=&quot;I invite you to ask on ElixirForum. I have never seen a truly hostile response. Sometimes posts don&amp;#39;t get traction due to ambiguity, and some smelled like &amp;#39;do my homework&amp;#39; so people ignored them. But every post with a genuine curiosity in it gets answered, as far as I can tell.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.nns.ee/2026/06/03/katana-badusb/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Pwnd Blaster: Hacking your PC using your speaker without ever touching it&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.nns.ee)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48382310&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;662 points · 107 comments · by xx_ns&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A security researcher discovered that the Creative Sound Blaster Katana V2X speaker can be remotely hacked via Bluetooth to install malicious firmware, turning the device into a covert listening tool or a &amp;#34;Rubber Ducky&amp;#34; that executes arbitrary keyboard commands on a connected PC. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.nns.ee/2026/06/03/katana-badusb/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Pwnd Blaster: Hacking your PC using your speaker without ever touching it    URL Source: https://blog.nns.ee/2026/06/03/katana-badusb/    Published Time: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 13:09:18 GMT    Markdown Content:  [In my last post](https://blog.nns.ee/2026/02/20/katana-v2x-re), I talked about reverse engineering my new Creative Sound Blaster Katana V2X&amp;#39;s firmware.    What initially started as simply wanting to write a Linux tool for communicating with my speaker ended up with me discovering…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discovery that speakers can be used to wirelessly flash custom firmware and execute commands on connected PCs has sparked criticism over the vendor&amp;#39;s claim that this is not a cybersecurity risk &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48382490&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Email from SingCERT stating vendor &amp;#39;do not consider this to be a vulnerability, as it does not present a cybersecurity risk.&amp;#39; So wirelessly writing custom firmware to someone else&amp;#39;s device that is connected via USB to their computer without even needing to pair is not a security vulnerability. Yea.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48382546&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;You can just make it type words, what&amp;#39;s the risk in that?&amp;#39; Makes you wonder what other peripheral companies out there are also operating with seemingly no security team. There must be other vulnerabilities like this just waiting to be discovered. My brother was awoken one morning at 2am because some neighborhood kids connected to his bluetooth speaker and blasted fart sounds on loop at max volume, and that&amp;#39;s literally only the absolute tippy top of the malicious bluetooth use iceberg.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Users highlighted the broader danger of &amp;#34;smart&amp;#34; peripherals acting as unmonitored network entry points or tools for audio-based data exfiltration &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48382602&quot; title=&quot;Oh yeah, for some reason the companies with the highest risk products seem to be the ones that care less about security. Don&amp;#39;t even get me started with &amp;#39;smart&amp;#39; bulbs and cameras that each individually connect to your local network and the Internet. You have 5 lightbulbs? That&amp;#39;s 5 different devices you need to track, keep updated and trust the in the vendor firmware&amp;#39;s security.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48382697&quot; title=&quot;Having a guaranteed audio channel makes this so much cooler for exploits -- you can exfiltrate over audio!! I love it. I wonder how many of these were sold. I also imagine based on Creative&amp;#39;s response (this is fine) that many other devices in the class have similar security models in place. Def scary.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also focused on the potential for supply-chain worms and state-sponsored toolkits that could exploit these vulnerabilities to compromise secure environments via Bluetooth &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48382893&quot; title=&quot;Why think so small? Perhaps the speaker itself can be used as the attacker. Any script kiddie with an LLM could write a worm that would spread through the supply chain, possibly even hacking speakers right on the factory floor and blasting Rickroll music or something similar. It would be interesting to see if Creative would still claim that it &amp;#39;does not present a cybersecurity risk&amp;#39;. Edit: Bonus points for closing the security hole and disabling the ability to flash the firmware normally, so…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384202&quot; title=&quot;If I were in charge of, say, the Mossad, I would have as a significant part of my budget purchasing every single bluetooth device on the market, and set a bunch of underemployed Israeli CS grads to work at finding these vulnerabilities, and then putting them into an easily deployed toolkit. You want an asset with access to, say, an Iranian government office, to be able to walk through the building with a phone and take control of as many machines as possible. Now that I think about it, I think…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48383410&quot; title=&quot;Ask it to create a proof of concept that is totally not a real worm and it will probably do it. If the restrictions are too good, just use a largely unrestricted open model via any inference provider. They are 90% sota, more than good enough for this task.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.macrumors.com/2026/06/03/macbook-neo-production-doubled-says-kuo/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;MacBook Neo is so popular that Apple doubled production&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (macrumors.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386238&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;353 points · &lt;strong&gt;391 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by tosh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple has reportedly doubled its 2026 production target for the MacBook Neo from 5 million to 10 million units following stronger-than-expected demand for the $599 laptop. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.macrumors.com/2026/06/03/macbook-neo-production-doubled-says-kuo/&quot; title=&quot;MacBook Neo is So Popular That Apple Reportedly Doubled Production    On an earnings call in late April, Apple&amp;#39;s CEO Tim Cook said that customer response to the MacBook Neo was &amp;#39;off the charts,&amp;#39; and the popularity of the laptop has reportedly led the company to significantly boost production. Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo this week said he believes that MacBook Neo shipments to Apple were doubled from an initial target of 5 million units to 10 million units in 2026 at some point after…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The MacBook Neo&amp;#39;s success is attributed to its aggressive $599 price point, which users suggest is made possible by Apple’s vertical integration, in-house chipsets, and manufacturing scale &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386943&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s amazing you can get an iPad for $349 and a Macbook for $599. Even the plastic 2009 macbook alone was $999 at the lowest. Very strange to see a company do this when everything else just seems to have gone up and up.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48388079&quot; title=&quot;I think Apple&amp;#39;s cost efficiency advantages are really compounding now and it&amp;#39;ll get increasingly hard for competitors to catch up. Everything they put in the product is either in-house or benefit from their scale and negotiating power. In the MacBook Neo&amp;#39;s case, everything from the in-house chipset and scale (for stuff like aluminum body) and the more RAM-efficient software is working in its favor. I&amp;#39;d bet that a different laptop manufacturer will struggle to make a profit at all if they made a…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386930&quot; title=&quot;I’m not shocked in the slightest. Great price point for younger folks to buy or be given as a gift, the build quality is good for what it is and it is snappy for most uses. It’s many years too late IMO but I suppose the economics only made sense once they controlled their own chipset. I imagine doing this in the intel days would have been a far worse choice&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters note that the ecosystem significantly reduces IT maintenance overhead for both families and enterprises compared to Windows or Linux &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48387425&quot; title=&quot;I ended up getting two (one for each of my daughters). The thing about Apple is that as the &amp;#39;IT&amp;#39; guy for my family, its ecosystem is the one which needs the least attention from me. It really just works. They have used Windows and Linux before (my kids and wife, that is), but something is always not quite right and needs my involvement. These days gone 100% Mac, my interventions are usually initial setup and whenever the Samsung printer jams.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48387889&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The thing about Apple is that as the &amp;#39;IT&amp;#39; guy for my family, its ecosystem is the one which needs the least attention from me. This is true in business/enterprise IT also. Any big company that&amp;#39;s done a switch, or at least offered an employee choice, almost immediately saw a huge drop in help desk workload from mac users. Legacy win32 apps aside, it&amp;#39;s baffling to me that Windows is still the dominant share of computers issued to employees at nearly every non-tech company.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that Windows remains dominant due to hardware upgradability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48388483&quot; title=&quot;There’s nothing baffling to it. Windows PCs are upgradable. Apple won’t even give you a PCie slot on its $10k mac studio ultra to install a better network card or whatever.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others find that PC competitors struggle to match Apple&amp;#39;s combination of build quality, battery life, and value &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48391322&quot; title=&quot;I have always had this notion that buying a Mac is the &amp;#39;premium&amp;#39; option, not just in quality, but maybe in price too. I am in the process of trying to find a business notebook for my spouse who is a Windows user. The goal is to have something that is as close to a Macbook Air as possible in terms of price, weight, performance and durability. What I am learning is that nothing that like that exists in the PC world. It&amp;#39;s a minefield of tradeoffs: plastic chassis&amp;#39;, bad screens, weird keyboards,…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48388232&quot; title=&quot;I think the clear demonstration of this is how small Apple&amp;#39;s motherboard is for the neo (and other M series) compared to everyone else). It really seems like the PC makers don&amp;#39;t understand the benefits of low power chips sufficiently. If you cap your chips TDP such that it can be cooled passively, you save money on heatsink, fan, vents, power circuitry (e.g. fewer capacitors), battery size, etc.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. However, there is some speculation that offering &amp;#34;inexpensive&amp;#34; goods could eventually dilute Apple&amp;#39;s status as a luxury brand &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48387835&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t doubt the Neo is a quality product, but I&amp;#39;m curious whether cheap MacBooks are going to sabotage Apple&amp;#39;s cachet as a luxury brand. It&amp;#39;s my personal experience that iOS users tend to look down on &amp;#39;green bubbles&amp;#39; in a way that can only be explained as some sort of brand superiority complex. I&amp;#39;m sure millionaires wouldn&amp;#39;t appreciate it if Lamborghini sold a $25K model...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/ddr5/32gb-of-ddr5-now-costs-usd375-minimum-ai-shortage-continues-to-squeeze-pc-building&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;32GB of DDR5 now costs $375 – AI shortage continues to squeeze PC building&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tomshardware.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48383241&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;388 points · 354 comments · by papersail&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Driven by an AI-related manufacturing shortage, the minimum price for 32GB of DDR5 RAM has surged to $375, nearly quadrupling costs from a year ago and significantly squeezing PC builders. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/ddr5/32gb-of-ddr5-now-costs-usd375-minimum-ai-shortage-continues-to-squeeze-pc-building&quot; title=&quot;32GB of DDR5 now costs $375 minimum — AI shortage continues to squeeze PC building    Lower-priced kits are disappearing by the day    ![](https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p/?c1=2&amp;amp;c2=10055482&amp;amp;cv=4.4.0&amp;amp;cj=1)    [Skip to main content](#main)    Unlock world-class roadmaps &amp;amp; trusted Bench data.  See More    ×    ## Unparalleled insights. Industry analysis. Insider access.    **Tom&amp;#39;s Hardware** Premium equips you with world-class  coverage and detailed insights into the evolving hardware landscape.    * ✓      **Full…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hacker News users report that DDR5 RAM prices have skyrocketed, with some kits jumping from $200 to $900 in a single year &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48383555&quot; title=&quot;This is the PCPartPicker chart that I monitor: https://pcpartpicker.com/trends/price/memory/#ram.ddr5.5600.... - $900 for 2x32GB, used to be $200 a year ago.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384359&quot; title=&quot;Yesterday I did a price check on the PC I built two years ago. It went from $2300 to $3650. The bulk of that increase was that the ram went from $210 to $940. Its now more expensive than when DDR5 was new.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. This surge is attributed to the &amp;#34;infinite money&amp;#34; being poured into AI, which has led manufacturers to prioritize high-margin HBM for data centers over consumer memory &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48385217&quot; title=&quot;Supply is both already constrained and AI companies have pre-purchased enough HBM at enough of a premium that most of the wafers are allocated to them. All the intermediaries are jacking up their prices so their inventory doesn&amp;#39;t empty too quickly, because they may not be able to refill it. It is hard to overstate the damage that the infinite money being poured into AI is doing to the wider economy. Anything involved in datacenters is going to experience shortages/price rises. A pre-existing…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some speculate that high prices are a tactic to prevent local AI models from competing with centralized services &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384018&quot; title=&quot;My bet is that the prices will crash once OpenAI (and/or Antrophic) IPO&amp;#39;s have happened. Right now the biggest threat to their IPO&amp;#39;s is that people realize that local models are good enough for whatever they&amp;#39;re peddling, what&amp;#39;s the most important factor to even running good enough models? RAM since you want the models in memory to not be total slogs.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others lament that PC gaming has returned to being an expensive &amp;#34;prosumer&amp;#34; hobby where a mid-range build can now cost upwards of $3,000 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386325&quot; title=&quot;The value of my desktop pc has almost doubled, my ps5 is worth ~ $150 more than I bought it years ago. It&amp;#39;s gotten to the point where nvidia doesn&amp;#39;t even bother to report their gaming revenue anymore.  It&amp;#39;s a clear sign that we&amp;#39;re back to the bad old days of pc gaming being a &amp;#39;prosumer&amp;#39; hobby, but don&amp;#39;t worry I&amp;#39;m sure nvidia and their ilk are salivating at the idea of making pc gaming into a streaming stadia like solution that you pay for monthly&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386766&quot; title=&quot;https://pcpartpicker.com/user/Sohcahtoa82/saved/n76zkL I think I paid a total of around $5,500 for the current components of my PC.  Hard to say for sure since my PC has been a Ship of Theseus for over 30 years and started as a 486.  The link merely reflects its current state. At one point, PCPartPicker was showing my PC as worth $11,000.  It&amp;#39;s now at $7,200 without including the RAM or PSU .  That would put it at $9,000. &amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s a clear sign that we&amp;#39;re back to the bad old days of pc gaming…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://burntsushi.net/encephalitis/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I was recently diagnosed with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (burntsushi.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384355&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;561 points · 177 comments · by Tomte&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Software developer Andrew Gallant shares his diagnosis of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis, detailing his recovery from severe neurological and psychiatric symptoms after receiving life-saving treatment for the autoimmune brain disorder. &lt;a href=&quot;https://burntsushi.net/encephalitis/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Encephalitis - Andrew Gallant&amp;#39;s Blog    URL Source: https://burntsushi.net/encephalitis/    Published Time: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 13:49:29 GMT    Markdown Content:  I was recently diagnosed with [anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-NMDA_receptor_encephalitis). It is an autoimmune disorder where your body’s normally helpful antibodies [start acting strangely](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-NMDA_receptor_encephalitis#Pathophysiology). This leads to inflammation in…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a pervasive pattern of medical misdiagnosis, where patients with complex autoimmune or chronic conditions are frequently told their physical symptoms are psychosomatic or &amp;#34;all in their head&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48387495&quot; title=&quot;My wife has a cardiac autoimmune disease that was similarly misdiagnosed (including an appalling “it’s all in your head” from her family MD at the time). We underwent a year of immense stress. Just days before her probable death, she had a pacemaker and defibrillator installed, which saved her life. I’m not entirely sure why I’m mentioning this, other than I sympathize deeply with your wife. What an absolute ordeal.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48388933&quot; title=&quot;My ex has mast cell activation syndrome. We would have to call for an ambulance 3-4 times a month because some days eating a grape could cause her to go into anaphylactic shock. She was allergic to whatever her body felt like at any given time. She was misdiagnosed/undiagnosed for 18 years. I was baffled by this, and I myself have spent numerous hours down the rabbit hole of nootropics, and had a DNA test and was researching myself and how things work and how supplements affect your body and…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48387596&quot; title=&quot;I had a much more common autoimmune disease, adult-onset Type 1 Diabetes (LADA), determined to be health anxiety by a very large, major renowned hospital who should have known better. It led to over a year of continued illness before finally I was diagnosed at an ER. I&amp;#39;m sure some people have psychosomatic or anxiety based illnesses, but it&amp;#39;s rather grating to be told by a psychologist that you&amp;#39;re worrying yourself to death when you are very, very sure that&amp;#39;s not the issue.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48391668&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; including an appalling “it’s all in your head” from her family MD at the time Oof. That one resonates so much for me - even living in a country with far better healthcare. There&amp;#39;s a term I dislike but is apt: medical misogyny. Basically it&amp;#39;s, &amp;#39;systemic, conscious, or unconscious gender biases [which] affect how a patient is treated by the healthcare system.&amp;#39;[1] Systemic in particular is that basically the vast amount of knowledge amassed in the medical sciences has come from studying men.…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters emphasize that these errors often stem from human bias, a lack of advanced diagnostic tools, and &amp;#34;medical misogyny,&amp;#34; where gender bias leads to the dismissal of female patients&amp;#39; concerns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48387685&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s been super eye-opening to me as an adult how frequent misdiagnoses are. I understand it&amp;#39;s good for a doctor to sound confident, but &amp;#39;confidently wrong&amp;#39; is imo much worse than &amp;#39;cautiously wrong&amp;#39;. We really need better imaging/diagnostic tools that cut down on human bias; hoping for a star trek tricorder someday.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48391668&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; including an appalling “it’s all in your head” from her family MD at the time Oof. That one resonates so much for me - even living in a country with far better healthcare. There&amp;#39;s a term I dislike but is apt: medical misogyny. Basically it&amp;#39;s, &amp;#39;systemic, conscious, or unconscious gender biases [which] affect how a patient is treated by the healthcare system.&amp;#39;[1] Systemic in particular is that basically the vast amount of knowledge amassed in the medical sciences has come from studying men.…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest that emerging technologies like LLMs or more accessible biomedical research could accelerate the discovery of new conditions like anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis, others reflect on the terrifying fragility of health and the high mortality rates even within younger demographics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48387547&quot; title=&quot;One thing that may be intriguing is that this is a relatively new diagnosis (first described in 2007). There&amp;#39;s so much medicine to discover and we need to keep supporting a biomedical research enterprise that can find reversible treatments to disorders that would otherwise be difficult to treat (his symptoms, for example, would be thought of as a schizophrenia manifestation in another era) https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2607118/&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48387669&quot; title=&quot;Yes, the biomedical world needs to go through the same boom that tech went through in the last 20 years. The problem is accessibility.  Tech grew largely because of how accessible the technology is.  Biomedical research is still very difficult to get into, and as a result seriously curtails the potential progress we as a society could make. I don&amp;#39;t know what the solution is but there&amp;#39;s got to be an easier way to tinker, test, explore, and play around with biomedical things (cells, viruses,…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48387400&quot; title=&quot;CDC mortality tables [1] are kind of eye opening for those who don&amp;#39;t realize how brief life is. Average age range on HN is probably in the 25-44 year old bracket. That bracket has an approximate mortality rate of 140/100k per year. HN has what, 5 million or so monthly users? So that means of all of &amp;#39;us&amp;#39;, it&amp;#39;s expected that around 7,000 HN readers age 25-44, die each year. That&amp;#39;s fairly close to 1 death per hour. [1] - https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/MortFinal2007_Worktable23r...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48390158&quot; title=&quot;At the risk of sounding like a cryptobro (&amp;#39;What about using a blockchain?&amp;#39;), did you ever try testing LLMs to see if they&amp;#39;d be able to diagnose it correctly? (I&amp;#39;m guessing you did the research before LLMs)&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/davinciresolve/whatsnew&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;DaVinci Resolve 21&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blackmagicdesign.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384482&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;434 points · 194 comments · by pentagrama&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Blackmagic Design has launched DaVinci Resolve 21, introducing a dedicated Photo page for still image grading, advanced AI tools for face reshapping and object searching, and expanded support for immersive VR workflows alongside significant updates to the software&amp;#39;s editing, color, and Fairlight audio modules. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/davinciresolve/whatsnew&quot; title=&quot;Title: DaVinci Resolve – What’s New    URL Source: https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/davinciresolve/whatsnew    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: What&amp;#39;s new](https://images.blackmagicdesign.com/images/products/davinciresolve/whatsnew//hero/hero-md.jpg)    ## What&amp;#39;s New    DaVinci Resolve 21 introduces the Photo page, bringing Hollywood&amp;#39;s most advanced color tools to still photography! A new generation of AI tools let you search media by content, read slate data, perform de-aging, blemish removal and…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DaVinci Resolve 21 is being hailed as a potential &amp;#34;Lightroom killer&amp;#34; and a top-tier photo editor for Linux, offering a compelling alternative to Adobe&amp;#39;s subscription model &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48385119&quot; title=&quot;For all the potshots about AI, this update is huge even if you take away the AI features. They basically added lightroom to this release. There&amp;#39;s some polish before you&amp;#39;d want to change your subscription, but its really tempting. It may be the best photo management/editor on linux. Yes, I know about darktable and rawtherapee and I stand by what I said. They also added a ton of motion graphics stuff which from the beta seem to be enough to undercut a lot of basic uses of after effects out. The…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48387534&quot; title=&quot;I was a lightroom user for almost 20 years, and their licensing ridiculousness was enough for me to:   - change up my workflow, avoiding raw so I can use simpler editing processes   - do way less editing   - take way fewer photos It sucks, but I just can&amp;#39;t justify their insane pricing scheme. I&amp;#39;ve been looking for Linux-capable tools for a while, and Darktable / Rawtherapee are a long way from what I&amp;#39;m after. What you describe sounds like a dream.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users are exhausted by the heavy &amp;#34;AI&amp;#34; branding, others argue these features are practical quality-of-life enhancements similar to long-standing tools like Photoshop&amp;#39;s healing brush &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48385014&quot; title=&quot;The whole first section: 9 features, 9 titles with &amp;#39;AI&amp;#39; in them. I don&amp;#39;t think their use of it is bad at all, I&amp;#39;m just tired.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48385880&quot; title=&quot;I really don&amp;#39;t understand why people are complaining about the AI features. These all mostly seem like solid quality of life enhancements and CGI-like tweaks.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48385864&quot; title=&quot;I remember CS2 making big news with the &amp;#39;healing brush&amp;#39;, that&amp;#39;s like 20 years ago or something like that.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The software&amp;#39;s one-time payment model remains highly praised as a &amp;#34;least-regretted&amp;#34; purchase, though some warn of potential backlash from anti-AI artists or legal risks regarding biometric data privacy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386823&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; ...before you&amp;#39;d want to change your subscription... For anyone not in the know, Resolve has an exceptionally capable and feature rich free version. A lot of the AI features (and &amp;gt;4k editing) are locked to the Studio licence which is a one-time payment, but works simultaneously on two computers (including different OS&amp;#39;s) and allows upgrades across major versions. I spent less than $300 on it a decade ago and my licence works fine on new v21 released this week. My least-regretted software…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386037&quot; title=&quot;Artists HATE AI. I fully expect some sort of DaVinci Resolve backlash, artists refusing to cooperate with those using this software.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48385969&quot; title=&quot;Hey Blackmagic, just be sure you&amp;#39;re not in violation of Illinois BIPA with the face search thing. They can and will come after you.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.science.org/content/article/mathematicians-issue-warning-ai-rapidly-gains-ground&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mathematicians issue warning as AI rapidly gains ground&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (science.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48382052&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;210 points · &lt;strong&gt;251 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by pseudolus&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.science.org/content/article/mathematicians-issue-warning-ai-rapidly-gains-ground&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The integration of AI into mathematics has sparked a debate over whether the field&amp;#39;s primary value lies in producing correct answers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48382424&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; However, the declaration argues math is more than a machine for producing correct answers. There might be more to maths than that, but that is definitely the most important part.  I love science funding. But not because it&amp;#39;s a jobs program for nerds.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; or in advancing human understanding and &amp;#34;why&amp;#34; a proof works &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48382678&quot; title=&quot;The most important part of math is advancing human understanding. A correct answer by itself is not as important as understanding why it is correct.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics worry that AI-generated proofs may become incomprehensible &amp;#34;slop,&amp;#34; creating a future where humans are mere &amp;#34;noise in the machine&amp;#34; and early-career researchers lose the incentive to develop foundational skills &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48382666&quot; title=&quot;Accelerationists may argue that the eroding of proper attribution and proof verification by humans is a meaningless short term struggle of a dying field. Mathematics seems to be entering an era where human + machine maximizes performance, much like chess in the 1990s. However, imagine a future where even talented mathematicians are nothing but noise in the machine (as is the case in chess now). A future where AI generates and verifies proofs without humans in the loop. Where the mathematics may…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48382835&quot; title=&quot;Much of math (or science) research has the strange quality of being mostly curiosity-driven, but having giant benefits that occasionally spin out to the public. Some questions are more urgent and practical. My feeling is that the more directly practical a question is, the more likely the research community is to support AI usage in that question. The annoying thing about recent AI advances is that they target questions on the wrong end of the spectrum: Erdos problems are exactly the sort of…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48382805&quot; title=&quot;To further this assertion, there is almost no value to deeply esoteric math that is technically correct, but completely inapplicable to any scientific reality, and completely unintelligible to humans. Consider these findings deep, dark corners in the unfathomably large hyperspace of mathematics. My guess is AI will be incredibly adept at identifying these types of findings, and it will be exceedingly difficult for humans to identify what is meaningful and what is not in the slop.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that AI will struggle to achieve true breakthroughs like unifying physics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48391120&quot; title=&quot;AI (in this form) will never be able to solve things we truly cannot solve yet. It might catch things that we didn&amp;#39;t project properly or brute force things no human can , but it will never unify general relativity with quantum mechanics. It&amp;#39;s amazing at finding hidden truths in large datasets, but won&amp;#39;t win a Nobel unassisted.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest that AI could eventually be used to elaborate on its work until it is human-readable, potentially avoiding the &amp;#34;useless&amp;#34; obscurity seen in some complex human-led mathematics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48383318&quot; title=&quot;Works of Shinichi Mochizuki immediately come to mind. He is not AI but provides very good examples of math that is useless because it is incomprehensible by (other) humans.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384775&quot; title=&quot;Do AIs produce answers whose work is incomprehensible to humans? It seems like you could just have the AI elaborate multiple times until you were satisfied with the explanation and documentation of what went into figuring out the answer. It’s not like the AI is one shotting the answer in a single opaque query anyways.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.sanders.senate.gov/op-eds/the-public-should-own-half-of-the-big-a-i-companies/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Public Should Own Half of the Big A.I. Companies&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sanders.senate.gov)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386551&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;207 points · &lt;strong&gt;243 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by droidjj&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Senator Bernie Sanders plans to introduce legislation creating a sovereign wealth fund by imposing a one-time 50% stock tax on major A.I. companies to ensure the public shares in the wealth and governance of technology built on collective human knowledge. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.sanders.senate.gov/op-eds/the-public-should-own-half-of-the-big-a-i-companies/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Public Should Own Half of the Big A.I. Companies » Senator Bernie Sanders    URL Source: https://www.sanders.senate.gov/op-eds/the-public-should-own-half-of-the-big-a-i-companies/    Markdown Content:  Artificial intelligence will almost certainly be the most transformational technology in the history of the world. It will profoundly affect the life of every man, woman and child in our country. It will bring — and is already bringing — unimaginable changes to our economy, our democracy,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Proponents of public ownership argue that AI companies have built their products by &amp;#34;usurping&amp;#34; the collective intelligence of human knowledge and copyright-protected works &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48387013&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; A.I. is built on our collective intelligence: our books, songs, artwork, journalism, computer code, scientific research, videos, conversations, images and ideas spanning generations I know many here would scoff at nationalizing a private company, but AI is a usurpation of human knowledge and quite literally at times. (Every AI company was embroiled in copyright lawsuits and lord knows what Qwen et al are up to.) In turn, everyone knows labor displacement is coming. My bet is the next…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386909&quot; title=&quot;Because AI companies basically took everything we ever wrote, drew, recorded, posted, or thought and turned it into a product with the power to lie, propagandize, and manipulate the public with zero oversight. Walmart is a parasite using welfare to subsidize their operations but they didn&amp;#39;t tell a judge that they were immune to copyright because they stole just so much damn information.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. They suggest that a sovereign wealth fund, modeled after successful examples in Alaska and Norway, could mitigate the &amp;#34;catastrophic negative externality&amp;#34; of mass labor displacement &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48387013&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; A.I. is built on our collective intelligence: our books, songs, artwork, journalism, computer code, scientific research, videos, conversations, images and ideas spanning generations I know many here would scoff at nationalizing a private company, but AI is a usurpation of human knowledge and quite literally at times. (Every AI company was embroiled in copyright lawsuits and lord knows what Qwen et al are up to.) In turn, everyone knows labor displacement is coming. My bet is the next…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48387068&quot; title=&quot;They do this in Alaska&amp;#39;s fund with great success[0] and Alaska is a deep red state. It&amp;#39;s primarily funded by oil and gas revenue and other mineral royalties. Also thats only (at least) 25% of total revenue, the other 75% the state spends directly. Norway&amp;#39;s oil fund is another famous example mentioned in the article.[1] [0]: https://apfc.org/ [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Pension_Fund_of_Nor...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics contend that arbitrarily seizing private property is &amp;#34;third-world&amp;#34; behavior and that the government should instead rely on broad, principle-based taxation rather than direct ownership &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48387082&quot; title=&quot;You can tax something without owning it.  It is the owning part that bothers me.  It implies that the government is going to shovel ridiculous amounts of money into these things and when the bubble finally pops We The People get nothing out of it.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386963&quot; title=&quot;Why does the public have a right to expropriate the property if AI companies specifically, as opposed to other types of companies? Just make broad rules that apply to everyone based on abstract principles. I’m fine even with very liberal economic approaches. If we want to raise corporate tax rates to 30%, fine, do that. Want to get creative? Half the equity of every company goes into a public fund. But this case by case, “sure is a nice company you got there” stuff is third-world shit.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386958&quot; title=&quot;Bernie Sanders.  I mean, he&amp;#39;s not always wrong, but he&amp;#39;s, um, kind of enthusiastic about just taking stuff from those who have it, considerably more than the current understanding of private property (or even taxation) considers acceptable.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Skeptics also warn that such a fund could become a tool for political corruption or that the public might be left holding the bag if the AI bubble bursts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386834&quot; title=&quot;Why half of AI and not half of Walmart &amp;amp; Exxon &amp;amp; Apple? Government spending is already ~40% of GDP. And what do we get with this half? A sovereign wealth fund?  That seems like a great tool for a certain corrupt politician to use as a carrot to make CEO&amp;#39;s bend to his/her whims. What benefit does that have for anyone else? You can&amp;#39;t build a sovereign wealth fund if you&amp;#39;re transferring all the money out.  That&amp;#39;s just more government spending, not a wealth fund...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48387082&quot; title=&quot;You can tax something without owning it.  It is the owning part that bothers me.  It implies that the government is going to shovel ridiculous amounts of money into these things and when the bubble finally pops We The People get nothing out of it.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.espressif.com/en/products/socs/esp32-s31&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ESP32-S31&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (espressif.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48385965&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;275 points · 150 comments · by volemo&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Espressif has introduced the ESP32-S31, a high-performance dual-core RISC-V SoC running at 320 MHz that supports Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.4, and Zigbee. Designed for advanced IoT and AI applications, it features 60 GPIOs, hardware-based security, and dedicated accelerators for image processing and human-machine interfaces. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.espressif.com/en/products/socs/esp32-s31&quot; title=&quot;Title: ESP32-S31 Dual-Core RISC-V + Multi-Protocol SoC    URL Source: https://www.espressif.com/en/products/socs/esp32-s31    Published Time: 2026-04-03T19:56:26+08:00    Markdown Content:  # ESP32-S31 Dual-Core RISC-V + Multi-Protocol SoC | Espressif Systems    [Skip to main content](https://www.espressif.com/en/products/socs/esp32-s31#main-content)    [![Image 1: Home](https://www.espressif.com/sites/all/themes/espressif/logo-black.svg)](https://www.espressif.com/en &amp;#39;Home&amp;#39;)    ## Main menu    *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The shift toward RISC-V architectures in the ESP32-S31 is highly praised for simplifying development workflows, particularly for Rust users who can now avoid proprietary toolchains &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386190&quot; title=&quot;Espressif is on fire! And the CPU even has SIMD instructions! RISC-V cores is a big deal for embedded systems because now compiling for SoCs is only a matter of `rustup target add riscv32imac-unknown-none-elf` instead of downloading half-broken proprietary toolchains and SDKs. Take a look at https://kerkour.com/introduction-to-embedded-development-wit... and https://kerkour.com/rust-esp32-pentest to get started with modern (Rust ;) embedded development.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some users find the &amp;#34;ESP32&amp;#34; branding increasingly confusing as the product line expands across vastly different architectures and feature sets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48387186&quot; title=&quot;I kind of wish these all weren&amp;#39;t called ESP32. ESP8266 and ESP8285 -&amp;gt; ESP32 made sense, but now we have 10+ different versions with different features and different architectures. Kind of like how in every thread involving a Raspberry Pi Pico (RP2030/RP2350), there&amp;#39;s always someone confusing it with the single board computer version. The ESP32 (Classic, usually WROOM-32E) is still usually what comes to mind when I hear ESP32.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While the chip includes SIMD instructions and motor control modules, there is debate regarding its suitability for high-performance motor control due to the apparent lack of hardware floating point and unknown ADC conversion speeds &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386567&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; And the CPU even has SIMD instructions! Yes, but it looks like there is no hardware floating point. The description of the CORDIC module indicates fixed-point calculations, which is consistent with the lack of any reference to floating point. I am happy the have CAN-FD and Motor PWM module, but nowhere did I see conversion times listed for the ADC. For motor control I demand 1uS conversion time or less, and in the last year I&amp;#39;ve switched from fixed point to floating point after holding off…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48387230&quot; title=&quot;Also why do you need 1uS for motor control?  1uS is 0.1 degrees of rotation at 16,666 RPM if I did the math right. I don&amp;#39;t know much about motor control, is it normal to need that fast of feedback?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the platform remains a favorite for hobbyist LED projects via ecosystems like WLED, though some users question the absence of specific protocols like Z-Wave &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386530&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been building hobby LED art projects with WLED (exclusively built on the ESP32 platform). It&amp;#39;s been a blast. These little boards are so powerful and the open source community continues to amaze me. My preferred controller platform is of the QuinLED line - comes with power distribution, voltage regulators, fat copper lines, configurable data-line resistors, and smart auxiliary hardware support all for an affordable $30-$50 per controller. (quinled.info) &amp;lt; https://kno.wled.ge/ &amp;gt; - WLED…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48388084&quot; title=&quot;I do a lot of LED projects too but I just use ws2812s. What do you need the controller for? Large brightness perhaps? Just curious.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386772&quot; title=&quot;Any reason why this device wouldn&amp;#39;t have Z-Wave? Is the wireless protocol significantly different than Thread and Zigbee?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://maxleiter.com/blog/weights&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;quot;They&amp;#39;re made out of weights&amp;quot;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (maxleiter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48391611&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;286 points · 90 comments · by MaxLeiter&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a satirical dialogue inspired by Terry Bisson, two characters grapple with the realization that artificial intelligence is composed entirely of mathematical weights and matrix multiplication rather than traditional reasoning units or databases. &lt;a href=&quot;https://maxleiter.com/blog/weights&quot; title=&quot;Title: Max Leiter    URL Source: https://maxleiter.com/blog/weights    Markdown Content:  _After Terry Bisson&amp;#39;s [&amp;#39;They&amp;#39;re Made Out of Meat&amp;#39;](https://www.eastoftheweb.com/short-stories/UBooks/TheyMade.shtml)._    &amp;#39;They&amp;#39;re made out of weights.&amp;#39;    &amp;#39;Weights?&amp;#39;    &amp;#39;Weights. Floating-point numbers. We checked the whole thing through. It&amp;#39;s nothing but weights.&amp;#39;    &amp;#39;Weights doing what? Where do the words come from?&amp;#39;    &amp;#39;The weights make the words. Are you understanding me? We opened it up. There&amp;#39;s no dictionary in…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether consciousness is an emergent property of complex systems, with some arguing it arises when individual components like neurons or weights reach a certain scale &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393244&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, I currently suspect that consciousness is an emergent property. I read elsewhere (it&amp;#39;s somewhere in my HN history, I&amp;#39;m sure) that the biggest compute we can currently muster is something like three or four magnitudes away from the number of neurons / connections (or their analog) that our brains have, so it may be a while until we can expect to see it in our machines. But, if the emergent phenomenon hypothesis is correct, then we eventually will. I&amp;#39;m more scared than pleased by the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48394002&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This is not meant as a gotcha, I am genuinely curious how you believe consciousness can be an emergent property. I was about to post the exact opposite question? How could it not be an emergent property? Unlike consciousness, the concept of emergence is pretty well defined: An emergent property is a characteristic or behavior that a complex system has, but which its individual components do not have on their own. Consciousness itself doesn&amp;#39;t have a well agreed upon definition, but I would…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some readers found the story&amp;#39;s poetic take on LLM &amp;#34;weights&amp;#34; resonant with human linguistics and time perception &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393124&quot; title=&quot;This read like poetry to me. Thank you for sharing it. I have a linguistics background and a lot of my philosophizing lately has been on whether or not the emergent abilities of the LLMs is deep down a similar mechanism that creates our consciousness. For a little bit I was working on having linguistics based evals for a kaggle competition. My challenge was whether or not I could mask things well enough to not trigger its internal state of certain phenomena, and that sent me down a rabbit hole…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393344&quot; title=&quot;Time is entropy unfolding as things with nonzero temperature do what they do. Psychological time is your own weights being updated in response to stimuli and internal processing. When there isn&amp;#39;t anything interesting happening, no updates are needed, and you don&amp;#39;t perceive much time. That&amp;#39;s why there&amp;#39;s a logarithmic effect on the &amp;#39;density&amp;#39; of time as you age.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others criticized it as &amp;#34;fractally wrong&amp;#34; for ignoring the structural rules and tokenization that underpin machine learning &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48392754&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not often I see something that&amp;#39;s fractally wrong but here we are. There is a dictionary, it&amp;#39;s called the tokenizer. There are grammar rules, they are just very weak because the structure of human language is generally quite weak. When presented with languages which have strong consistent grammars the weights are very easily interpretable as a grammar: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.02177 The point of the original short story is that the computational substrate doesn&amp;#39;t matter when you have…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48392940&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think the grokking paper is a great argument for the difference between weights and meat.  E.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cortical_Labs learning to play Pong. The tokenizer is, at best, a sensory mechanism as evidenced by 1) the random generation of the tokenization scheme, and 2) vastly different tokenization schemes produce virtually identical behavior.   It&amp;#39;d be like if Noah Webster threw a bunch of movable type into a bucket (breaking some words in half) and then drew randomly…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. A notable exchange occurred when a commenter used a specific study on &amp;#34;dish brain&amp;#34; Pong to argue against the story&amp;#39;s premise, only to be corrected by the study&amp;#39;s actual author who asserted that encoding and structure remain fundamental across both biological and digital substrates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48392940&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think the grokking paper is a great argument for the difference between weights and meat.  E.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cortical_Labs learning to play Pong. The tokenizer is, at best, a sensory mechanism as evidenced by 1) the random generation of the tokenization scheme, and 2) vastly different tokenization schemes produce virtually identical behavior.   It&amp;#39;d be like if Noah Webster threw a bunch of movable type into a bucket (breaking some words in half) and then drew randomly…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393078&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m kind of stunned that someone is using my work to tell me I&amp;#39;m wrong. I wrote the code for the dish brain pong and encoding information was a huge part of what that experiment was about. So when I way that the grok paper and the pong paper fundamentally agree I have some idea of what I&amp;#39;m talking about.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://letsencrypt.org/2026/06/03/pq-certs&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A Post-Quantum Future for Let&amp;#39;s Encrypt&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (letsencrypt.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48385114&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;241 points · 135 comments · by SGran&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let’s Encrypt has announced plans to adopt Merkle Tree Certificates (MTCs) to provide post-quantum authentication without the performance lag of standard post-quantum algorithms. The organization aims to launch a staging environment in late 2026 and a production-ready environment by 2027. &lt;a href=&quot;https://letsencrypt.org/2026/06/03/pq-certs&quot; title=&quot;Title: A Post-Quantum Future for Let&amp;#39;s Encrypt    URL Source: https://letsencrypt.org/2026/06/03/pq-certs    Markdown Content:  Let’s Encrypt is committed to a post-quantum-safe Web PKI. The path we’re planning to take is Merkle Tree Certificates (“MTCs”), a new approach that adds post-quantum authentication to the web without sacrificing the speed and reliability that have made TLS universal.    This post is about these plans and why we believe MTCs are worth pursuing as a key to a post-quantum…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The transition to post-quantum cryptography is driven by well-understood theoretical models of quantum computing capabilities, even though practical hardware remains in its infancy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48385569&quot; title=&quot;Better encryption sounds good to me in general, but I don&amp;#39;t really understand, how we can make quantum safe encryption, when we don&amp;#39;t know yet, what capabilities it will have (or if it is possible at all). I am obviously not in the field, but as far as I know, no QC is close of working for a practical purpose(aside quantum research), but to make it practical, it needs a groundbraking brakethrough of some sort. But if a brakethrough happens, can we really estimate the consequences?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48385635&quot; title=&quot;The capabilities of quantum computing, in theory, are pretty well known. There&amp;#39;s basically a few extra operations which can be done efficiently on it and so that can be built into the threat model, even if no-one&amp;#39;s built a quantum computer yet. (Of course, basically all encryption, especially asymmetric encryption, is predicated on there not being some as-yet-undiscovered exploitable structure to the mathematics on which it is built. Modern cryptography, AFAIK, tends to have some decent…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48385774&quot; title=&quot;By this standard, there is no current encryption method (except for pre-shared one time pads when used correctly) that is known to be unbreakable. For example, it is not proven that prime factoring can&amp;#39;t be done much more efficiently on a classical computer - for all we know, it&amp;#39;s possible that tomorrow someone will come up with a novel algorithm that can break RSA in just a small number of operations. Same is true for elyptic curves - we don&amp;#39;t have any mathematical proof that it&amp;#39;s impossible…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While symmetric encryption like AES is largely resistant to quantum attacks, asymmetric methods are vulnerable, leading experts to recommend &amp;#34;Hybrid KEMs&amp;#34; that combine classical and quantum-safe algorithms to ensure security if either is compromised &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386009&quot; title=&quot;Supersingular Isogeny Key Exchange is one that was invented to be quantum-safe but turned out to be unsafe at any speed, so hybrid encryption is still a good idea. You use both a quantum-safe algorithm and a classical algorithm, encrypting your data twice and remaining secure if either one is broken.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48387477&quot; title=&quot;But that&amp;#39;s a miss, it&amp;#39;s like one of those Neal Stephenson moments where the creator is using the right language (so it&amp;#39;s not like reading William Gibson who clearly has no idea and knows it - he&amp;#39;s going for the emotional feel not the technology) but they don&amp;#39;t understand what&amp;#39;s actually going on. OTP is in theory the correct choice if you don&amp;#39;t have working symmetric cryptography but in fact the &amp;#39;Quantum computer&amp;#39; approach barely dents our symmetric cryptography. I&amp;#39;ve written about this before,…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386293&quot; title=&quot;If you encrypt your data twice (taken very literally): c1 = E1(p, k1)    c2 = E2(p, k2) If we assume E1() is broken by a quantum computer, E2 doesn&amp;#39;t matter to protect p. What you do instead is to use multiple KEMs and combine them securely (see the blog post I linked) in such a way that the confidentiality of your shared secret (i.e., the key you actually use for encryption ) is preserved if any of the underlying KEMs is unbroken. ss1, ct1 = KEM1(pk1)    ss2, ct2 = KEM2(pk2)    secret =…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. However, participants emphasize that this must be implemented by combining shared secrets rather than simply encrypting data twice, which would leave the plaintext exposed if one layer is broken &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386172&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; You use both a quantum-safe algorithm and a classical algorithm, encrypting your data twice and remaining secure if either one is broken. No. Don&amp;#39;t do that. If you encrypt your data twice, and one of them is broken by a quantum computer, the adversary gets the plaintext anyway. You want a Hybrid KEM, not encrypting twice. The nuance matters. https://durumcrustulum.com/2024/02/24/how-to-hold-kems/&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386293&quot; title=&quot;If you encrypt your data twice (taken very literally): c1 = E1(p, k1)    c2 = E2(p, k2) If we assume E1() is broken by a quantum computer, E2 doesn&amp;#39;t matter to protect p. What you do instead is to use multiple KEMs and combine them securely (see the blog post I linked) in such a way that the confidentiality of your shared secret (i.e., the key you actually use for encryption ) is preserved if any of the underlying KEMs is unbroken. ss1, ct1 = KEM1(pk1)    ss2, ct2 = KEM2(pk2)    secret =…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fzakaria.com/2026/06/01/every-byte-matters&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Every Byte Matters&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (fzakaria.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48382382&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;236 points · 118 comments · by ingve&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Optimizing data structures by using &amp;#34;Struct of Arrays&amp;#34; layouts and minimizing object sizes can significantly improve performance by maximizing CPU cache efficiency and reducing memory latency. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fzakaria.com/2026/06/01/every-byte-matters&quot; title=&quot;Title: Every byte matters    URL Source: https://fzakaria.com/2026/06/01/every-byte-matters    Published Time: 2026-06-01T13:07:00-07:00    Markdown Content:  I have spent a large portion of my career working in Java. In that time, you get used to huge classes. New functionality? Just add a new method and field to the class. The cost of each new field is rarely considered. Performance is often considered from a _classic computer science_ perspective by considering asymptotic analysis of the algorithms…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the performance trade-offs between high-level managed languages like Java and low-level languages like C++ or Rust, particularly regarding memory layout and object headers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48382739&quot; title=&quot;The JVM is currently pretty bad for memory allocation. Every object (i.e. not a primitive) has a header that IIRC is 12 bytes. But there is good news in JVM land: this will be reduced to 8 bytes in the next JVM release, and Project Valhalla will give the tools to do away with headers entirely in some cases. Project Valhalla also has tools to manage off-heap memory, which is important in many cases. The JVM is an odd place where it requires too much heap to compete with the AOT compiled…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48382963&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Every object (i.e. not a primitive) has a header that IIRC is 12 bytes. But there is good news in JVM land: this will be reduced to 8 bytes in the next JVM release Since JDK 25 it&amp;#39;s already 64 bits with the `-XX:+UseCompactObjectHeaders` flag [1], but in JDK 27 it will be the default [2]. &amp;gt; where it requires too much heap to compete with the AOT compiled languages Not to compete but to beat, and not too much, but the right amount. Low level languages are optimised for control, not performance…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that Java&amp;#39;s object headers and startup times hinder its competitiveness, others contend that the JVM&amp;#39;s moving collectors and JIT optimizations allow large-scale programs to eventually outperform AOT-compiled languages by reducing the CPU overhead of manual memory management &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48382963&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Every object (i.e. not a primitive) has a header that IIRC is 12 bytes. But there is good news in JVM land: this will be reduced to 8 bytes in the next JVM release Since JDK 25 it&amp;#39;s already 64 bits with the `-XX:+UseCompactObjectHeaders` flag [1], but in JDK 27 it will be the default [2]. &amp;gt; where it requires too much heap to compete with the AOT compiled languages Not to compete but to beat, and not too much, but the right amount. Low level languages are optimised for control, not performance…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384437&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Do you have concrete examples of large scale Java programs that are significantly more performant than comparable programs in native languages like C++? Yes. I was working in a place that made large sensor-fusion applications, air-traffic control applications, and logistical planning, each in the 2-8MLOC range. Over time, we ported all of them from C++ to Java because C++&amp;#39;s performance overheads were too annoying to work around. Of course, in principle it&amp;#39;s always possible to match and…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Participants also highlight that &amp;#34;every byte&amp;#34; matters most in specific data structures; for instance, adopting a &amp;#34;struct-of-arrays&amp;#34; (SoA) approach can significantly optimize cache locality for bulk processing, though it may introduce overhead for frequent insertions or deletions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384123&quot; title=&quot;The article shows nicely how &amp;#39;every byte matters&amp;#39; is false. First, it starts off by talking about the cost of a new field, when the actual topic is array-of-structs vs. struct-of-arrays. Then, this: &amp;gt; How much of an impact can this have?  &amp;gt; Reading is:alive (1 byte) Across 1M Monsters You aren&amp;#39;t reading one byte here, you are reading 1M bytes! Of course, optimizing the access to 1M bytes is something to consider. Optimizing the access to one byte isn&amp;#39;t. The article is definitely worth reading…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384179&quot; title=&quot;Even more so, it shows that SoA data structure means you can add fields to your 1M monsters with little impact.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384710&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; you can add fields to your 1M monsters with little impact. Great for this access pattern, but I wouldn&amp;#39;t make a general statement like that. This is the same thing as row-oriented vs column-oriented databases, OLTP vs OLAP.   SoA is weak if you are adding/removing monsters more often than accessing a single &amp;#39;hot&amp;#39; field.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a notable disagreement over whether low-level languages are inherently faster, with some claiming that the manual optimization&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.copetti.org/writings/consoles/playstation/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;PlayStation Architecture&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (copetti.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48382142&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;282 points · 57 comments · by gregsadetsky&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The PlayStation architecture utilizes a custom MIPS R3000A-based RISC CPU paired with specialized coprocessors for geometry and video decoding to deliver a simple, developer-friendly 3D environment. While lacking a hardware floating-point unit and Z-buffer, it achieved commercial success through efficient DMA-driven graphics and high-quality CD audio. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.copetti.org/writings/consoles/playstation/&quot; title=&quot;Title: PlayStation Architecture    URL Source: https://www.copetti.org/writings/consoles/playstation/    Published Time: 2019-08-08T00:00:00Z    Markdown Content:  ## Supporting imagery    *   [Model](https://www.copetti.org/writings/consoles/playstation/#cover-model)  *   [Motherboard](https://www.copetti.org/writings/consoles/playstation/#cover-motherboard)  *   [Diagram](https://www.copetti.org/writings/consoles/playstation/#cover-diagram)    * * *    ## A quick introduction    Sony knew that 3D hardware…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users argue that PlayStation 1 graphics have aged poorly compared to the &amp;#34;perfect&amp;#34; upscaling of PS2 titles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48383544&quot; title=&quot;These articles are always excellent. PS1 games do not hold up so good, but PS2 games uprezzed to 1440p-4k are basically perfect imo.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the original hardware&amp;#39;s visual quirks and &amp;#34;wobble&amp;#34; have a unique charm that is best preserved through CRT displays or modern filters &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48383670&quot; title=&quot;They hold up pretty well when you play them as they were originally supposed to: on a CRT if you can or using emulators&amp;#39; CRT filters if you can&amp;#39;t. Trying to play them at very high resolutions on crisp LCD displays is the worst way to go IMO.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384423&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; PS1 games do not hold up so good Eeh ... speak for yourself. PS1 did mark the dawn of the 3D era for home consoles. There are lots of people who are into the low poly 3D models with the characteristic PS1 &amp;#39;wobble&amp;#39;. Sure a lot of it may be nostalgia but it does have its charm and I can say it&amp;#39;s grown a lot on me over time. Especially once I learned about the PS1&amp;#39;s unique hardware limitations. If my social media feed is anything to go by &amp;#39;PS1 graphics&amp;#39; are having a bit of a revival with lots of…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical discussions highlight the console&amp;#39;s unconventional memory architecture, such as RAM aliasing and the use of specific memory regions to store game state data in pointers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48385748&quot; title=&quot;There are memory regions that are mapped to the same physical memory - https://psx-spx.consoledev.net/memorymap/ I worked on the Metal Gear Solid port from PSX to PC, and Konami programmers chose a wild trick to store how the &amp;#39;C4&amp;#39; bomb was planted - either on the wall, or on the ground. Essentially the pointer pointed to the same physical memory address, but if it was planted on the wall (or on the ground, I forgot) - then it was OR-ing it with 80000000h or was A0000000h - or maybe something…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386446&quot; title=&quot;Usually, that kind of stunt nowadays is done by using the lowest significant bits and masking them off when dereferencing the pointer, trading off for a higher alignment (so 4 bits gives you 16-byte alignment). The PS1 also happens to have RAM aliasing, because there&amp;#39;s not enough RAM to cover the entire decoding window for the RAM. I don&amp;#39;t know the details, but I&amp;#39;ve seen PS1 executables setting their stack pointer to the end of the devkit&amp;#39;s 8 MiB of RAM and yet they work on retail units,…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386649&quot; title=&quot;You can see this on many consoles, iirc it basically just boils down to some address pins not being connected anywhere, so whatever the pins are set to doesn&amp;#39;t matter as they&amp;#39;re just out in the air so to say.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Developers and enthusiasts continue to find value in these hardware deep dives, noting that the PS1&amp;#39;s limitations have even inspired a modern aesthetic revival in indie gaming &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48382944&quot; title=&quot;Love Copetti. Even as someone who is not particularly knowledgeable of everything he’s talking about, I I really enjoy thumbing through his writing and diagrams. There’s just something really fun about trying to understand what is going on under the hood with these machines, especially fifth and sixth generation consoles&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384423&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; PS1 games do not hold up so good Eeh ... speak for yourself. PS1 did mark the dawn of the 3D era for home consoles. There are lots of people who are into the low poly 3D models with the characteristic PS1 &amp;#39;wobble&amp;#39;. Sure a lot of it may be nostalgia but it does have its charm and I can say it&amp;#39;s grown a lot on me over time. Especially once I learned about the PS1&amp;#39;s unique hardware limitations. If my social media feed is anything to go by &amp;#39;PS1 graphics&amp;#39; are having a bit of a revival with lots of…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48382965&quot; title=&quot;1994 always gets me too. It feels like they are more a late 90s thing.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://agenticmotherfucking.website&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Agentic Mfw&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (agenticmotherfucking.website)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48379203&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;208 points · 67 comments · by elmerland&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The website satirizes the shift from clean, maintainable web development to &amp;#34;agentic&amp;#34; AI-generated &amp;#34;slop,&amp;#34; arguing that technical craft has been replaced by high-compute token burning and venture-backed complexity designed solely to capture attention. &lt;a href=&quot;https://agenticmotherfucking.website&quot; title=&quot;Title: Vibe-Coded Motherfucking Website    URL Source: https://agenticmotherfucking.website/    Markdown Content:  And nobody gives a single fuck how it&amp;#39;s built anymore.    ## Look at this shit. It&amp;#39;s still _perfect_.    The previous motherfuckers spent a decade teaching you the holy commandments of clean code. I have, begrudgingly, honored every one of them on this page, because the agent did it in one shot while I was on the toilet:    *   Shit&amp;#39;s lightweight and loads fast.  *   Fits on all your shitty…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion is divided between users who find the site’s aggressive, LLM-generated hyperbole cathartic and &amp;#34;funny,&amp;#34; and those who find the style exhausting and difficult to engage with &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48379575&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m fatigued by this hyperbole and profanity, especially when written by an LLM. There is too much of this. Human-written or not it makes it very difficult for me to engage with. The sentiment is bad. Is building this better than building nothing? Just because this is how things are does not it&amp;#39;s how they should be. I&amp;#39;m very tired.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48379300&quot; title=&quot;There are a few bangers in there&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48379689&quot; title=&quot;This site is for the lolz and obviously following the style set by the previous mf websites. I find it cathartic to laugh at the ridiculousness of the situation we are in, but also genuinely engage with the neck breaking pace of change we are all having to adjust to. And the LLM came up with some really funny lines&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters praise specific &amp;#34;banger&amp;#34; lines regarding industry salaries and the decline of reading, others dismiss these sentiments as &amp;#34;bullshit&amp;#34; projection and a fetishization of intelligence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48379287&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Accessibility doesn&amp;#39;t matter when the content is engineered to be inaccessible to thought. Act sarcastic all you want, that&amp;#39;s a killer line. You do care.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48379634&quot; title=&quot;The headline on that section, &amp;#39;Static sites are for people who can still read&amp;#39;, caught me off guard.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48379985&quot; title=&quot;Because it&amp;#39;s also bullshit. &amp;#39;People who read&amp;#39; prefer static sites and not prefer any kind of interactivity is just fetishizing intelligence. Readers don&amp;#39;t give a fuck if your site is coded in react or static, most of them dont even know web technology statistically. Projection at its peak&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48379894&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; get hired at a comp number that requires a comma you&amp;#39;ve never used before Gotta hand it to Claude, that&amp;#39;s almost a pretty decent line.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is general agreement that the content was likely authored by Claude, though opinions vary on whether this AI-driven cynicism is a valuable critique of the current tech landscape &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48379689&quot; title=&quot;This site is for the lolz and obviously following the style set by the previous mf websites. I find it cathartic to laugh at the ridiculousness of the situation we are in, but also genuinely engage with the neck breaking pace of change we are all having to adjust to. And the LLM came up with some really funny lines&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48379582&quot; title=&quot;Out of curiosity, which AI persona should I attribute this writing to? Is this Claude?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48379648&quot; title=&quot;Ya, it’s Claude&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/nextfuckinglevel/comments/1tvmcin/i_live_in_the_take_off_path_of_sfo_and_built_a/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I built a ceiling projection mapping of the planes flying over my house&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (old.reddit.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48383823&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;213 points · 32 comments · by frereubu&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A resident living in the takeoff path of San Francisco International Airport created a custom projection mapping system that displays real-time visuals of planes flying over their house onto their ceiling. &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/nextfuckinglevel/comments/1tvmcin/i_live_in_the_take_off_path_of_sfo_and_built_a/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Blocked    URL Source: https://old.reddit.com/r/nextfuckinglevel/comments/1tvmcin/i_live_in_the_take_off_path_of_sfo_and_built_a/    Warning: Target URL returned error 403: Forbidden    Markdown Content:  ## whoa there, pardner!    Your request has been blocked due to a network policy.    Try logging in or creating an account [here](https://www.reddit.com/login/) to get back to browsing.    If you&amp;#39;re running a script or application, please register or sign in with your developer credentials…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users discussed the technical feasibility of using older Raspberry Pi hardware for ADS-B tracking, noting that even a Pi 2b can handle multiple SDR dongles with relatively low CPU usage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384806&quot; title=&quot;I bought several 3b+ Raspberries a really long time ago and this seems like the perfect simple&amp;amp;breathtaking project for such ancient hardware. Who needs a fourth PiHole on their local network?! &amp;#39;Fortunately&amp;#39; I live directly beneath CHA&amp;#39;s main landingstrip, so lots of regular data available. Fortunately, I am not in the main takeoff path because that would be much worse .&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48385378&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve got a Raspberry Pi 2b I&amp;#39;ve been using for probably close to a decade, with two SDRs hanging off it, pulling aircraft ADS-B locations and VHF radio transmissions out of the sky. It&amp;#39;s a great application for this platform. ADS-B scanner averages about 25% CPU and the VHF airband receiver averages about 17% (uses hardware FFT).&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While the project&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;X-ray&amp;#34; projection of overhead flights was praised, some commenters initially mistook the demo&amp;#39;s outdoor footage for the projection itself, sparking ideas for similar displays featuring the night sky or airport-style arrival screens &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384958&quot; title=&quot;The repo subtitle is `Project the aircraft passing overhead onto your ceiling, in real time — an X-ray through the roof.` The demo video starts outside pointing at a cloudy sky with an airplane passing overhead. My mind, seeded with the word &amp;#39;x-ray&amp;#39;, thought the outside shot was the video projection on his ceiling. I thought his rain gutters were crown molding, and when the camera man runs inside, I thought he was running outside to show the real life airplane. The actual projection is neat,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48385681&quot; title=&quot;Thought the same thing.  Would be super cool to project the night sky with procedurally generated cellestial objects, planes, spaceships, etc.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48391107&quot; title=&quot;Thanks for the percentages – let&amp;#39;s me know that a PiHole can co-pilot as an SDR tracker. Which do you use (via USB, I suspect..)? I&amp;#39;mma slap a cheap LCD on (instead of projecting onto ceiling) and make it look like the arrival screen you&amp;#39;d see behind an airport kiosk (and broadcast the VHF/tower). This is a perfect front porch project (to encourage neighborhood curiosities).&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable real-world parallels include a San Diego restaurant that uses a split-flap display to identify planes passing overhead in real-time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386539&quot; title=&quot;Random aside: there’s a restaurant in San Diego on the SAN flight path with a split flap display over the bar. Every time a flight passes over it updates to show flight number and departure airport. It’s quite neat.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://medium.com/@tridge60/rsync-and-outrage-d9849599e5a0&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rsync and outrage&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (medium.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48379478&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;167 points · 25 comments · by st3fan&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am unable to summarize the story because the provided link returned a security error and the content consists only of a bot verification message. &lt;a href=&quot;https://medium.com/@tridge60/rsync-and-outrage-d9849599e5a0&quot; title=&quot;Title: Just a moment...    URL Source: https://medium.com/@tridge60/rsync-and-outrage-d9849599e5a0    Warning: Target URL returned error 403: Forbidden  Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: Icon for medium.com](https://medium.com/favicon.ico)    ## medium.com    ## Performing security verification    This website uses a security service to protect against malicious bots. This page is displayed while the website verifies you are…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The recent rsync update sparked significant backlash because a minor version release introduced major regressions, such as breaking absolute paths and links mode &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48380450&quot; title=&quot;A bit of a mixed one here. The vibe coding got the project attention and it looks like he&amp;#39;s going to get the help he needed. However the &amp;#39;outrage&amp;#39;, if you even call it that, wasn&amp;#39;t entirely misplaced when pretty basic bugs were introduced by this, such as: Can&amp;#39;t use rsync with absolute paths: https://github.com/RsyncProject/rsync/issues/922 Links mode is broken: https://github.com/RsyncProject/rsync/issues/915 The scale of the commits, and rewriting the entire testing framework was pretty big…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48381313&quot; title=&quot;Maybe because the explanation isn&amp;#39;t so much an explanation but an admission that core functionality was broken in a minor version release - and therefore almost orthogonal to the use of AI. If there had been no major regressions, do you think anyone would have complained? People are (correctly) not going to be held to some kind of lower standard just because they &amp;#39;used AI&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;were fixing security issues&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the &amp;#34;outrage&amp;#34; was a disproportionate reaction to AI usage, others contend the frustration was justified by the scale of the rewrite and the maintainer&amp;#39;s perceived refusal to acknowledge basic errors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48379627&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s sad that the outrage posts got hundreds of comments while this article, from the maintainer explaining the CVEs and test suites, only has this singular comment and is already on the second page. A lie travels around the globe while the truth is putting on its shoes. Do better, HN.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48380593&quot; title=&quot;A major version bump would have been helpful, and having such a large rewrite be initially a beta could have calmed the hoards. &amp;gt; The world of software engineering has changed dramatically in the last few months I disagree, but I guess we shall see how this is going to pan out. We&amp;#39;ve all introduced schoolboy errors in our time regardless of how long we&amp;#39;ve been developers. Messing up absolute paths because you only tested on relative happens to the best of us, but generally we say &amp;#39;woops&amp;#39; and…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384494&quot; title=&quot;11 hours since this has been posted and 20 comments. Nobody that&amp;#39;s raging really cares about the reasoning. All that matters is: AI use spotted -&amp;gt; time for the warpath.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Commentators suggest that a major version bump or beta period would have mitigated the conflict, noting that &amp;#34;vibe coding&amp;#34; critical infrastructure without adequate testing highlights the precarious nature of modern open-source maintenance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48380477&quot; title=&quot;I wonder whether there would have been less complaint had the number been a major increase, say to v4 beta. That amount of change in a minor version number bump seems unusual, but I don’t know rsync enough, I just use the version bundled in my 2/4 year old LTS distros and assume it works. This does once again feel like a case of https://xkcd.com/2347/ I do wonder about “The world of software engineering has changed dramatically in the last few months”. Has it really? I’ve been hearing that for…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48381911&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;The vibe coding got the project attention and it looks like he&amp;#39;s going to get the help he needed. I guess vibecoding certain software is now the new way of &amp;#39;instead of asking for help, write the wrong solution instead&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48380593&quot; title=&quot;A major version bump would have been helpful, and having such a large rewrite be initially a beta could have calmed the hoards. &amp;gt; The world of software engineering has changed dramatically in the last few months I disagree, but I guess we shall see how this is going to pan out. We&amp;#39;ve all introduced schoolboy errors in our time regardless of how long we&amp;#39;ve been developers. Messing up absolute paths because you only tested on relative happens to the best of us, but generally we say &amp;#39;woops&amp;#39; and…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-06-02</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-06-02</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://moddedbear.com/gmail-thinks-im-stupid-so-i-left&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Gmail thinks I&amp;#39;m stupid, so I left&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (moddedbear.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48375016&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;778 points · 456 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author is leaving Gmail after 16 years due to the platform&amp;#39;s intrusive and &amp;#34;disrespectful&amp;#34; generative AI features, such as unsolicited message summaries and persistent writing prompts, opting instead for a custom domain hosted by Fastmail. &lt;a href=&quot;https://moddedbear.com/gmail-thinks-im-stupid-so-i-left&quot; title=&quot;Title: Gmail Thinks I&amp;#39;m Stupid, So I Left    URL Source: https://moddedbear.com/gmail-thinks-im-stupid-so-i-left    Published Time: 2026-06-01T09:26:06-06:00    Markdown Content:  ## [Let me tell you a story](https://moddedbear.com/gmail-thinks-im-stupid-so-i-left#let-me-tell-you-a-story)    I go to check my email in Gmail’s web UI. I see a few new messages regarding feedback on a project I’m working on. I click through to read one of them and the first thing I’m greeted with is a message summary I…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are increasingly frustrated with Gmail’s intrusive AI features and sluggish performance, leading many to migrate to faster alternatives like Fastmail &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377703&quot; title=&quot;Looking for your alternative? Let me give you some (non financially motivated) praise for Fastmail. It has everything Gmail has - even app passwords, hide my email, and ios integration. The only criticism is the calendar doesn’t autocomplete addresses so that’s a bit more typing than I would like. But everything you do in Fastmail is instant . They live up to the name! Once you try it and go back, you’ll be shocked - Gmail makes you stare at its logo for multiple seconds while it shrugs and…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48375472&quot; title=&quot;Related to this, I hate how aggressively Google pushes Gemini and all of the privacy implications involved with that. 1) Lots of features got moved around and there are now many &amp;#39;Write with AI&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;Generate image with AI&amp;#39;, etc buttons polluting user interfaces even though I don&amp;#39;t use them and don&amp;#39;t want to use them. 2) Actually, I would use some of these features if I didn&amp;#39;t have to do a full opt-in to Smart Features for Google Workspace. If I&amp;#39;m writing a blog post and want to generate a cat…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. A primary criticism is the use of LLMs to &amp;#34;compile&amp;#34; short prompts into vapid, multi-paragraph emails, which recipients find burdensome to &amp;#34;decompile&amp;#34; back into meaningful information &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48376275&quot; title=&quot;I can appreciate LLMs for some use cases, but writing emails for the user is the one that really baffles me. It&amp;#39;s one thing if you don&amp;#39;t speak English well and could use some help making yourself understood, but the amount of native speakers using this is so strange to me. How does this help you? If you can write to the LLM telling it what kind of email to write, you might as well just write the email.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48376415&quot; title=&quot;The most frustrating thing to me is to receive a 5-paragraph-plus email that was clearly written with some AI that filled in the email with vapid and useless talking points, like &amp;#39;Let me know if you need any other blah blah blah; While there is clearly a need for system improvement, we are working hard to address the underlying and fundamental issue; This is a lesson that it&amp;#39;s not just a feature, it&amp;#39;s a critical path for our users, etc.&amp;#39; My theory is that people are fundamentally averse to the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48376646&quot; title=&quot;Specifically, lets imagine LLMs as compilers - you&amp;#39;re passing your prompt through to get some pretty language at the end. Don&amp;#39;t send me your compiled code, send me your prompt.  Let it be rude, if the wording is awkward I guarantee I can understand it just as well as an LLM, ignore the fact that my daughter just graduated and offering hallucinated platitudes. Send me the actual question, don&amp;#39;t make me try and decompile a big blob of empty text to the ten word prompt that contains all the actual…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some remain tethered to Gmail for its superior automated inbox categorization &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48378002&quot; title=&quot;Does it automatically filter my email into tabs for primary, promotions, social, and updates? Cause that is the single most useful feature offered by Gmail that I have yet to find elsewhere. I&amp;#39;m not talking about manually tagging, setting up, and filtering all incoming email before my inbox can self-organize. I mean automatically. Only show me the true primary items in my inbox from the jump. Everything else can wait. In the absence of this feature my inbox becomes a torrent of incoming mail…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others note a decline in core quality, specifically regarding the service&amp;#39;s inability to filter obvious spam &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48375241&quot; title=&quot;What surprises me most about gmail and AI is that they seem really quite bad at filtering out obvious spam. I get so many messages from people I have never heard from, on relatively new domains, with endings like &amp;#39;if this isn&amp;#39;t relevant for you right now, say &amp;#39;not now&amp;#39; and I&amp;#39;ll not circle back&amp;#39; (a clear attempt to allow unsubscribe without using the word). How is it that they haven&amp;#39;t figured out how to stop these messages from getting through? I&amp;#39;m at the point that I&amp;#39;m considering those email…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. This trend of &amp;#34;pop-up&amp;#34; driven UX and forced AI integration is seen as a broader industry issue affecting both Windows and Google Workspace &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48375324&quot; title=&quot;While I haven&amp;#39;t had this issue with Gmail, I recently got a new computer and the first two weeks for full of moments like this. It&amp;#39;s shocking to me how much we&amp;#39;ve let popups go rampant on everything. Perhaps the worst offender is Windows update, as it won&amp;#39;t even let you use your own computer without clicking through 10 screens refusing all sorts of products they are trying to push on you.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48375217&quot; title=&quot;I really hope Apple watches what Google and Microsoft are doing with AI, specifically shoving it into their customers&amp;#39; workflow without invitation, and steers far away from that path.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48375472&quot; title=&quot;Related to this, I hate how aggressively Google pushes Gemini and all of the privacy implications involved with that. 1) Lots of features got moved around and there are now many &amp;#39;Write with AI&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;Generate image with AI&amp;#39;, etc buttons polluting user interfaces even though I don&amp;#39;t use them and don&amp;#39;t want to use them. 2) Actually, I would use some of these features if I didn&amp;#39;t have to do a full opt-in to Smart Features for Google Workspace. If I&amp;#39;m writing a blog post and want to generate a cat…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48370330&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Please don&amp;#39;t spam people looking for employment. It&amp;#39;s just cruel&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48370330&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;911 points · 258 comments · by IliaLitviak&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An unemployed job seeker is calling for an end to automated spam after receiving a cold pitch from a developer instead of a job lead, highlighting the emotional toll such messages take on vulnerable applicants. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48370330&quot; title=&quot;Earlier I posted in a “Who wants to be hired?” thread, looking for a place where I could apply my experience in hospitality, food tech and automation.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;A couple hours later I received an email:&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;“Hi Ilia,&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;I saw your comment on the June Who’s Hiring thread. I build production-ready TypeScript and Python systems that integrate LLMs into real workflows, with particular focus on RAG, agent orchestration, and clear blah-blah-blah”&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Come on.  I am a forced immigrant with a wife, a cat, rent and…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a growing frustration with automated cold outreach, ranging from &amp;#34;bug bounty&amp;#34; extortion schemes to recruiters who refuse to disclose company names to protect their commissions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48370696&quot; title=&quot;My email is filled with junk from cybersecurity &amp;#39;experts&amp;#39; telling me that my open source project is &amp;#39;very compromised&amp;#39; and that they will gladly reveal to me what the issue is, if I commit to paying them a bug bounty. I get at least a few every week. I hate them, but I feel like we are well past the point where in any place where there is money to be made, the majority of cold outreach will be from semi-personalized AI agents. You just have to accept that most of the time your get contacted by…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48370794&quot; title=&quot;Reminds me of all the recruiters who reach out to me saying they&amp;#39;re working on filling some engineer position but never say the company name, and when asked, they want to have a call. Stop wasting my time, STATE THE COMPANY UPFRONT AND AT THE TOP, preferably in the subject line&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48370866&quot; title=&quot;They can&amp;#39;t, otherwise a significant fraction of the people they reach out to would just skip the head hunter and contact the company directly. Same reason these same head hunters will usually strip any direct-contact details out of your resume before sending on to companies -- they don&amp;#39;t want those companies running around them and contacting the candidate directly. IMO, these people are all grifters and uses-car-salesman. Their goal is to get as many people as possible to use them to change…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users note that low-quality form letters have existed for decades, others observe a shift toward &amp;#34;creepy&amp;#34; LLM-based agents and sophisticated scams, such as North Korean agents seeking remote proxies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48370824&quot; title=&quot;Whether it helps or not—the typical contact like this hasn’t been a human for decades now. What I’m seeing these days is materially almost identical to what went out ten years ago. Basic form letter with a cover sentence or paragraph of either no relevance, or a tenuous but normally ill-researched claim at relevance.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48370502&quot; title=&quot;I got one of those too, from &amp;#39;Alya&amp;#39;, which seems to be an LLM-based tool the creator describes as his daughter. Beyond the usual rudeness of spam, that&amp;#39;s a little creepy.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48370847&quot; title=&quot;They say they&amp;#39;re a software developer from a poor country looking for someone willing to leave their laptop on overnight for a 50% split of the paycheck. I got one a long time ago, they even mentioned they need help because their can&amp;#39;t do the work from an IP of their country. Needless to say I just trashed the email and only figured out it was one of those after reading about the NK employee scandal on here.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong consensus that these practices waste time and provide little value, with some participants suggesting that direct hiring is significantly more cost-effective for companies than using third-party headhunters &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48370696&quot; title=&quot;My email is filled with junk from cybersecurity &amp;#39;experts&amp;#39; telling me that my open source project is &amp;#39;very compromised&amp;#39; and that they will gladly reveal to me what the issue is, if I commit to paying them a bug bounty. I get at least a few every week. I hate them, but I feel like we are well past the point where in any place where there is money to be made, the majority of cold outreach will be from semi-personalized AI agents. You just have to accept that most of the time your get contacted by…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48370866&quot; title=&quot;They can&amp;#39;t, otherwise a significant fraction of the people they reach out to would just skip the head hunter and contact the company directly. Same reason these same head hunters will usually strip any direct-contact details out of your resume before sending on to companies -- they don&amp;#39;t want those companies running around them and contacting the candidate directly. IMO, these people are all grifters and uses-car-salesman. Their goal is to get as many people as possible to use them to change…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.adafruit.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Adafruit receives demand letter from Fenwick legal counsel on behalf of Flux.ai&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.adafruit.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48368121&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;645 points · 261 comments · by semanser&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Adafruit has temporarily suspended blog publications after receiving a demand letter from Flux.ai’s legal counsel, which alleges defamation and CFAA violations following Adafruit’s reporting on a server misconfiguration and public security interests. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.adafruit.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Adafruit Industries - Makers, hackers, artists, designers and engineers!    URL Source: https://blog.adafruit.com/    Markdown Content:  ### June 1, 2026 AT 8:05 pm    ## [Adafruit Receives Demand Letter From Fenwick Legal Counsel on Behalf of Defy Gravity, Inc. Flux.AI (“Flux”)](https://blog.adafruit.com/)    ![Image 1: limor fried &amp;amp; phillip torrone](https://cdn-blog.adafruit.com/uploads/2026/06/ptlimor.jpeg)    Adafruit received at 10:38 p.m. ET on May 22, 2026 a letter from former FBI chief of…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legal dispute between Adafruit and Flux.ai has prompted users to share negative experiences with Flux.ai, describing it as an expensive, &amp;#34;Software-as-a-Casino&amp;#34; experience that consumes significant tokens for minimal results &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48368721&quot; title=&quot;Adafruit probably did a review of AI PCB tools. I&amp;#39;ve used Flux.ai before; it was a pretty bad experience. After about 50-100$ in tokens a couple of times, I couldn&amp;#39;t get more than a couple of simple components on the schematic. And not in sensible positions. The product just grinds tokens for little return, in my opinion. I had far better luck wiring together KiCad MCP, SKIDL. There are some AI-driven autorouters out there now. Placement is probably the big issue that needs to be solved now. I…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48368798&quot; title=&quot;I tried this last week and had the same experience. It was terrible and they got $140 out of me before I realized what it was (not) capable of. Their support was nonexistent as well.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48369484&quot; title=&quot;All of these Gen AI tools where you pay a subscription fee are basically Software-as-a-Casino. You spin the wheel and hope it doesn&amp;#39;t come up 00, then chase good money after bad when it does. Add in the parasocial relationship that some people develop with the LLM and you basically have OnlyFans but instead of vaguely dissatisfying feet pics to order it&amp;#39;s vaguely dissatisfying code to order. It&amp;#39;s that edge of &amp;#39;almost there, just one more token, bro&amp;#39; that makes it addictive.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that AI could be better utilized to augment deterministic tools rather than replacing them entirely &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48369116&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; There are some AI-driven autorouters out there now. Placement is probably the big issue that needs to be solved now. Interesting that within an IC this is basically &amp;#39;solved&amp;#39;, or at least properly automated with classical numeric techniques such as simulated annealing. I would have thought there&amp;#39;s a big opportunity in a mixed-technique approach, where you use AI to extract unstructured data from datasheets and then feed it into more deterministic tools. I also note that it&amp;#39;s very easy to waste…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48369359&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; mixed-technique approach I think my biggest annoyance with the way we rolled out AI is that nobody seemed to want to use it to augment already working solutions. Just throw everything out and have an LLM do it instead.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the current generative approach often results in &amp;#34;vaguely dissatisfying&amp;#34; outputs that require constant, addictive troubleshooting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48369484&quot; title=&quot;All of these Gen AI tools where you pay a subscription fee are basically Software-as-a-Casino. You spin the wheel and hope it doesn&amp;#39;t come up 00, then chase good money after bad when it does. Add in the parasocial relationship that some people develop with the LLM and you basically have OnlyFans but instead of vaguely dissatisfying feet pics to order it&amp;#39;s vaguely dissatisfying code to order. It&amp;#39;s that edge of &amp;#39;almost there, just one more token, bro&amp;#39; that makes it addictive.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Amidst the technical debate, Adafruit&amp;#39;s founders have signaled their intent to share their side of the legal story &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48368866&quot; title=&quot;hi everyone, phil and limor here, any questions for now, email press@adafruit.com limor and i are very much looking forward to telling our story.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ianthehenry.com/posts/why-janet/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why Janet? (2023)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ianthehenry.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48367907&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;461 points · 239 comments · by yacin&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Janet is a small, embeddable Lisp dialect that offers a simple core, native binary compilation, and powerful text parsing through grammars. It features both mutable and immutable collections, a robust macro system, and a modern syntax designed for ease of use in scripting and application development. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ianthehenry.com/posts/why-janet/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Why Janet?    URL Source: https://ianthehenry.com/posts/why-janet/    Markdown Content:  I never thought it could happen to me. I mean, parentheses? In this day and age? But for the past couple years, my go-to programming language for fun side projects has been a little Lisp dialect called [Janet](https://janet-lang.org/).    ```  (print &amp;#39;hey janet&amp;#39;)  ```    I like Janet so much that [I wrote an entire book about it](https://janet.guide/), and put it on The Internet for free, in the hopes of…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on Janet, a modern Lisp dialect praised for abandoning &amp;#34;ancient customs&amp;#34; like `CAR` and `CDR` in favor of more intuitive naming &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48368015&quot; title=&quot;Pretty compelling, especially &amp;#39;Janet does not adhere to the ancient customs. CAR is called first. PROGN is called do. LAMBDA is fn, and SETQ is def.&amp;#39; - a sign of good sense for sure! How fast is it? Also my main objection to Lisps is still the horrible bracket syntax. Yes it&amp;#39;s unambiguous and easy to parse, but it&amp;#39;s HORRIBLE to read and edit. I wish this project had been a success (or something similar to it): https://readable.sourceforge.io/ Also I don&amp;#39;t think static typing is really optional…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While proponents argue that Lisp&amp;#39;s power lies in its simple core execution environment and referential transparency, skeptics remain deterred by the &amp;#34;horrible&amp;#34; bracket syntax and a lack of static typing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48368126&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; But by allowing you to unquote literal functions, Janet makes it possible to write macros that are completely referentially transparent. These lisp guys really get excited over very abstract things. If you say this to an average person on the street they will probably try to run away.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48368015&quot; title=&quot;Pretty compelling, especially &amp;#39;Janet does not adhere to the ancient customs. CAR is called first. PROGN is called do. LAMBDA is fn, and SETQ is def.&amp;#39; - a sign of good sense for sure! How fast is it? Also my main objection to Lisps is still the horrible bracket syntax. Yes it&amp;#39;s unambiguous and easy to parse, but it&amp;#39;s HORRIBLE to read and edit. I wish this project had been a success (or something similar to it): https://readable.sourceforge.io/ Also I don&amp;#39;t think static typing is really optional…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48369500&quot; title=&quot;You don’t program in Lisp, do you? I used to be confused by the smug Lisp weenies. Now I am one. And the difficult thing I’ve found over the years is that Lisp is sort of unexplainable. You either “get it” or you don’t. Yes, it has macros, but macros are a bit overrated. I’ve been programming in Lisp for decades and I rarely write macros. I think the thing that is difficult to convey is how powerful Lisp’s core execution environment is while at the same time being just a page of code that a CS…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The thread also reflects a broader nostalgia for &amp;#34;pre-AI&amp;#34; technical debates, though participants disagree on whether Lisp’s historical innovations still offer unique value over modern &amp;#34;Blub&amp;#34; languages &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48368109&quot; title=&quot;This post is refreshing - smells of the pre AI discussions on the internet. A new language, a new syntax, heavy debate with people who have spent years writing code. I think someone should start a community online where AI isnt allowed.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48369328&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t see why Lisp&amp;#39;s history would necessarily imply the family is worth learning in 2026. What (other than macros) do lisps offer that other modern languages don&amp;#39;t?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48369500&quot; title=&quot;You don’t program in Lisp, do you? I used to be confused by the smug Lisp weenies. Now I am one. And the difficult thing I’ve found over the years is that Lisp is sort of unexplainable. You either “get it” or you don’t. Yes, it has macros, but macros are a bit overrated. I’ve been programming in Lisp for decades and I rarely write macros. I think the thing that is difficult to convey is how powerful Lisp’s core execution environment is while at the same time being just a page of code that a CS…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://coveillance.org/a-walking-tour-of-surveillance-infrastructure-in-seattle/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A walking tour of surveillance infrastructure in Seattle (2020)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (coveillance.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48369980&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;393 points · 270 comments · by eustoria&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This walking tour guide identifies hidden surveillance infrastructure in downtown Seattle, including Acyclica Wi-Fi trackers, automated license plate readers, and an NSA-linked AT&amp;amp;T wiretap site, to educate the public on how data is collected and shared across corporate and government agencies. &lt;a href=&quot;https://coveillance.org/a-walking-tour-of-surveillance-infrastructure-in-seattle/&quot; title=&quot;A walking tour of surveillance infrastructure in Seattle    coveillance.org    [Coveillance Toolkit ↗](/)    [→ STREET SEEN: Pittsburgh surveillance walking tour](/street-seen-pittsburgh-surveillance-walking-tour/) [→ rise of tech-fueled surveillance](/understanding-the-rise-of-tech-fueled-surveillance-a-workshop/) [→ mapping data stories](/mapping/) [→ Seattle surveillance walking tour](/a-walking-tour-of-surveillance-infrastructure-in-seattle/) [→ countersurveillance…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The expansion of surveillance infrastructure in Seattle is driven by a desire for public safety, yet many argue it is failing to curb crime because prosecutors often refuse to press charges without direct video evidence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48373132&quot; title=&quot;I think this is just the new normal. My car was stolen in Seattle and it was found with the person driving it when he was pulled over by police.  In the car he had paperwork with his name on it, a weapon, and his work uniform in the trunk with a name badge (he was a security guard - lol) along with a neighborhood witness. Despite a mountain of evidence, the prosecutors declined to press charges because without direct video evidence of him stealing the car, they would not get a jury to convict,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48372292&quot; title=&quot;I still feel so conflicted on things like the Flock cameras. On one hand I understand that they have the capability of incredibly enhancing the ability for police departments to solve more crimes. Especially things related to vehicle theft, they could likely track down your stolen vehicle very quickly especially if they have a wide network of cameras. However, my concern is always about the possibility for misuse. Even if I trust the current government, it doesn&amp;#39;t mean I will trust a future…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48375309&quot; title=&quot;Honest question, do we know why crime isn’t being prosecuted anymore? I’ve noticed where I live this definitely seems to be the case and has a two fold effect, police aren’t even bothering to enforce laws because when they do the city/county refuses to prosecute and then criminals are getting wise to this and escalating their crimes. Previously where I live there would be violent crimes but generally in the early hours (2-4am) but in the last 5 years those same crimes have been happening more…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. This reliance on digital proof has created a cycle where &amp;#34;unreasonable&amp;#34; doubts are treated as reasonable, leading to a lack of accountability that encourages further criminal activity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48373132&quot; title=&quot;I think this is just the new normal. My car was stolen in Seattle and it was found with the person driving it when he was pulled over by police.  In the car he had paperwork with his name on it, a weapon, and his work uniform in the trunk with a name badge (he was a security guard - lol) along with a neighborhood witness. Despite a mountain of evidence, the prosecutors declined to press charges because without direct video evidence of him stealing the car, they would not get a jury to convict,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374786&quot; title=&quot;If you&amp;#39;re wondering what is being discussed in the meetings about whether or not more surveillance should be deployed, at the city and county levels, this is it. Crime isn&amp;#39;t being prosecuted, the criminals know it, and this breeds more crime (and more criminals). Even when they are imprisoned and incarcerated, they&amp;#39;re probably in jail for somewhere between 24 hours and a few weeks. They know pretty much everyone else in jail, so it&amp;#39;s almost like going to a camp reunion for them. There used to…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48373825&quot; title=&quot;Your forgetting the nonsense a defense attorney will conjure. How do you know he didn&amp;#39;t buy the car from the thief? We had a similar issue with the hit and run of my grandfather: even though video evidence found the car and later saw the suspect leave the car, the detectives   worried a defence attorney would argue someone else may have been driving at the time  the accident (e.g his wife), and therefore &amp;#39;beyond  reasonable doubt&amp;#39; might be questioned. In the end, the detectives managed to…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics also worry that these systems enforce biased social norms through automated &amp;#34;gazes&amp;#34; and risk future misuse by governments to track journalists or dissidents &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48371246&quot; title=&quot;I wonder what they mean by this? &amp;gt; The camera can have different ways of seeing encoded in it, including kinds of gazes that enforce social agreements about what kinds of behavior and people are considered “normal” The phrase &amp;#39;kinds of gazes&amp;#39; strikes me as the sort of thing that&amp;#39;s only going to make sense to people trained in a very particular and idiosyncratic flavor of ethical critique. What a normal person sees here is, &amp;#39;These cameras can detect if people are acting bizarre and dangerous,&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48372292&quot; title=&quot;I still feel so conflicted on things like the Flock cameras. On one hand I understand that they have the capability of incredibly enhancing the ability for police departments to solve more crimes. Especially things related to vehicle theft, they could likely track down your stolen vehicle very quickly especially if they have a wide network of cameras. However, my concern is always about the possibility for misuse. Even if I trust the current government, it doesn&amp;#39;t mean I will trust a future…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48371491&quot; title=&quot;My best guess would be [[Surveillance cameras normalize/denormalize behavior in a way that is easily biased and undemocratic.]] It might e.g. direct the full force of law against a drunk urinating on a tree (easy to spot/classify), while tolerating vicious verbal attacks disguised by somewhat subdued body language (missing data/difficult to detect). Letting automated surveillance systems judge people will inevitably influence our own collective judgement.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.hopefullyuseful.com/blog/macos-needs-its-grid-back/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;macOS needs its grid back&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.hopefullyuseful.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48364800&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;386 points · 255 comments · by ranebo&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer has created GridLion, a new macOS app that restores the 3x3 grid-based virtual desktop navigation found in older versions of the operating system. The tool aims to improve spatial memory and workflow efficiency by bypassing the horizontal-only &amp;#34;Mission Control&amp;#34; layout introduced in macOS Lion. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.hopefullyuseful.com/blog/macos-needs-its-grid-back/&quot; title=&quot;macOS Needs Its Grid Back    Two decades ago I had a better Mac desktop experience than I have today. I only had a single low res (by todays standards) screen, yet I felt like Hugh Jackman in Swordfish - deftly navigating more than nine displays without thinking, muscle and spatial memory working seamlessly together. TLDR; I built an app to return macOS spaces to its Pre-Lion Grid-enabled Glory. Read on for the increasingly rare experience of an actual human dropping a bit of nostalgia, the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a tension between macOS security and user autonomy, with some arguing that Apple’s multi-step permission process is a &amp;#34;disrespectful&amp;#34; barrier for power users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48365153&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If they approve, the settings open, then the user has to find the specific little toggle and enable it. Another security prompt then done. Why isn’t this at most 2 prompts? Answer: Because modern-day Apple has subscribed to a particular brand of mitigation for the &amp;#39;noobs will always click &amp;#39;Allow&amp;#39; especially if you ask them to first&amp;#39; problem. The mitigation is that Apple just dumps you on step 2 of a little 4-5 step mini sysadmin adventure where you prove, every time, that you&amp;#39;re sophisticated…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest these hurdles are necessary to prevent non-technical users from bypassing safety features &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48366895&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; As a complete nerd, you&amp;#39;d think maybe I&amp;#39;d like that I can prove my skills like this, but it comes off as deeply disrespectful to me as the user that I can&amp;#39;t disable this. You seem to have understood the problem. But then you didn&amp;#39;t follow. If there was a way to disable this, first thing that the grandma would do is watch a video how to disable that and lose security from then on. Of course it is not perfect, but their approach here is really decent. And also, if you find yourself needing to…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48367594&quot; title=&quot;Never underestimate the ingenuity of a motivated fool. My litmus test for this sort of thing is Excel - I think we all can agree that Excel is used for way more than it should be, and the most complicated, unhinged uses of it are done by non-technical folks looking to get a task done through desperation.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others propose that advanced users should be able to disable these protections via recovery mode or by disabling System Integrity Protection (SIP) &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48367212&quot; title=&quot;Could make it disable-able only from the terminal in recovery mode. That one would be too hard / bothersome to fend off most cases I feel like&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48365548&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; but they should offer a way for those of us who aren&amp;#39;t clueless to turn whatever it is off. I&amp;#39;m not sure if it&amp;#39;s what you&amp;#39;re asking for, but you can disable SIP: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/security/disabling...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond security, users lament the decline of Mission Control&amp;#39;s usability, specifically the loss of the &amp;#34;grid&amp;#34; view and the introduction of tedious animations that hinder efficient navigation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48365202&quot; title=&quot;Prior to MacOS 10.11, Mission Control was good: you would swipe up with four fingers and it would show you a preview of all of your spaces. Then in 10.11, for no discernable reason, they changed it to suck: rather than showing you a preview, the bar just says &amp;#39;Desktop 1&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;Desktop 2&amp;#39;, etc until you mouse over it; the practical effect is that using spaces is disorienting and requires memorization. Some third-party software pretends to restore this functionality, but they do it by repositioning…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48365026&quot; title=&quot;This fixes a dozens-of-times-per-day annoyance for me. The grid is good, but even better is the instant virtual display switching. Nowhere is the death-by-a-thousand-paper-cuts annoyance of modern macOS worse than having to hit Ctrl→→→→→→→ and suffer those repeated animations, over and over.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://microsoft.ai/news/introducingmai-code-1-flash/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;MAI-Code-1-Flash&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (microsoft.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374466&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;437 points · 189 comments · by EvanZhouDev&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft has launched MAI-Code-1-Flash alongside six other new MAI models, expanding its suite of artificial intelligence offerings. &lt;a href=&quot;https://microsoft.ai/news/introducingmai-code-1-flash/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;microsoft.ai&amp;amp;#x2F;models&amp;amp;#x2F;mai-code-1-flash&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;microsoft.ai&amp;amp;#x2F;models&amp;amp;#x2F;mai-code-1-flash&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;microsoft.ai&amp;amp;#x2F;pdf&amp;amp;#x2F;MAI-Code-1-Flash-Model-Card.PDF&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;microsoft.ai&amp;amp;#x2F;pdf&amp;amp;#x2F;MAI-Code-1-Flash-Model-Card.PDF&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Launching seven new MAI models: &amp;lt;a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of MAI-Code-1-Flash has sparked debate over the utility of small models, with some users arguing they waste time on serious coding &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48375599&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a start and I welcome competition but I don&amp;#39;t think I ever used small cloud models like Haiku 4.5. They are cute but for serious coding they tend to waste your expensive time. And this certainly wont bring me back to GitHub Copilot which I cancelled yesterday. GitHub Copilot had competitive pricing until yesterday when they changed from per-request to one of the most expensive per-token quotas. Seriously, take a look at their burning subreddit for some laughs:…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; while others believe their efficiency represents the future of the industry &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48375053&quot; title=&quot;It’s about bang for buck. That high a score for 5B params is pretty good, nigh unbelievable a short while ago. It is my belief that smaller models will get better and better, and even cloud SOTA models will shrink. Yet another reason the current buildout will feel like the railroads.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some developers find success using smaller models like Gemini Flash to reduce costs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48375153&quot; title=&quot;I use Gemini 3 Flash, I&amp;#39;ve seen the Claude Code setups, bullish on Anthropic people are driving up tokens but I am able to produce outcomes with a fraction of the money.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others report that open-weights models like Qwen and DeepSeek consistently outperform established &amp;#34;small&amp;#34; cloud models in specialized tasks like security auditing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377217&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been doing benchmarking of various models for finding hard security bugs, and my faith in Haiku (and Sonnet, even) has dropped precipitously in the process. Self-hosted Qwen 3.6 27B consistently outperforms both for finding security bugs, which was a shocking result. I expected Qwen to be around Haiku level, maybe a little worse, and I definitely expected it to be worse than Sonnet. And, DeepSeek and MiMo perform much better than Haiku and Sonnet, near Opus/GPT 5.5 levels, at a fraction of…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48375188&quot; title=&quot;Huh, according to that model card this is a 137B total parameter model. Performance doesn&amp;#39;t seem that good: - MAI-Code-1-Flash (137B-A5B) = 51% on SWE-bench pro - Qwen3.6-35B-A3B = 49.5% on SWE-bench pro  ( https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B ) They benchmark against Claude Haiku but Haiku is not good, it&amp;#39;s worse than tiny open models you can run locally or via API at 10% the cost.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant frustration regarding GitHub Copilot’s recent pricing changes and the perceived lack of original design in Microsoft&amp;#39;s marketing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48375599&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a start and I welcome competition but I don&amp;#39;t think I ever used small cloud models like Haiku 4.5. They are cute but for serious coding they tend to waste your expensive time. And this certainly wont bring me back to GitHub Copilot which I cancelled yesterday. GitHub Copilot had competitive pricing until yesterday when they changed from per-request to one of the most expensive per-token quotas. Seriously, take a look at their burning subreddit for some laughs:…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48375848&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s with the lack of Microsoft design language on the website? It&amp;#39;s painfully obvious they&amp;#39;re trying to emulate Anthropic&amp;#39;s style here and it looks tacky.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374811&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s so weird to me that the benchmarks remain so low, but the models are marketed as revolutionary. And if you say that low coding capabilities aren&amp;#39;t a problem, say that to the token price hike and &amp;#39;general use&amp;#39; model setup. Why not sell it as a math agent? Why do I have to set up 4 agents to check each others&amp;#39; work?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.tjll.net/you-dont-love-systemd-timers-enough/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Love systemd timers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.tjll.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48367904&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;364 points · 238 comments · by yacin&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The article argues that systemd timers are a superior, modern alternative to traditional cron jobs, offering benefits such as clearer execution history, human-readable scheduling, and advanced features like randomized delays, persistent missed-task execution, and the ability to wake a suspended system. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.tjll.net/you-dont-love-systemd-timers-enough/&quot; title=&quot;Title: You Don&amp;#39;t Love systemd Timers Enough    URL Source: https://blog.tjll.net/you-dont-love-systemd-timers-enough/    Published Time: Tue, 05 May 2026 19:24:56 GMT    Markdown Content:  ### [«](https://blog.tjll.net/this-is-your-sign-to-self-host/) You Don&amp;#39;t Love systemd Timers Enough    *    5 May, 2026  *   2,139 words  *   9 minute read time    My favorite metonymic technology term is &amp;#39;cron job&amp;#39;: even though `cron` may not literally be the daemon that executes actions on a schedule, we apply the term…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a shift toward systemd timers due to their resilience, specifically the ability to run missed tasks immediately after system startup, a feature that traditionally required the separate &amp;#34;anacron&amp;#34; utility in cron-based systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48369628&quot; title=&quot;Moved from cronie to systemd timers because they are resilient to system startup times. My backup strategy is to create a borg archive entry every day at a fixed time. With cronie the system needs to be running at the scheduled time, but systemd timer tolerates this and runs the service as soons as the system is available. Btw this is my repo for the backup automation: https://github.com/gchamon/borg-automated-backups&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48370136&quot; title=&quot;Cronie has a mechanism for this, called &amp;#39;anacron&amp;#39;, which is called hourly by cron (on my system, /etc/cron.hourly/0anacron), and performs all the /etc/cron.{daily,weekly,monthly} tasks, no matter if the earliest possible schedule was missed (and with a configurable random delay). You can modify /etc/anacrontab to create custom schedules. To do this at the user level, you can add something like &amp;#39;@hourly anacron -t /path/to/anacrontab -S /path/to/spooldir&amp;#39; to the user&amp;#39;s crontab, though I&amp;#39;ve never…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find the systemd service file syntax &amp;#34;ugly&amp;#34; or overly complex compared to the long-standing simplicity of cron &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48367989&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been almost convinced by systemd (and have switched to using it), but God the syntax of those service files is so ugly ...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48371997&quot; title=&quot;We have used cron perfectly fine for decades and it served us well within its very clear limitations. But now obviously we were so blind and wrong all this time and the only true solution is of course systemd.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48370054&quot; title=&quot;systemd is complex on first view, but after using it you didn&amp;#39;t want to use anything else. It&amp;#39;s handy to manage everything using systemctl&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that cron’s grammar is difficult to master for non-trivial schedules involving randomization or specific intervals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48371268&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;You just put numbers aligned with the titles.&amp;#39; That is not a fair summarization of their point because that is not the grammar. There&amp;#39;s commas, slashes, asterisks, combinations, and then if you want randomization you need to put it in the command itself because cron can&amp;#39;t do it. (Some crons can, but it&amp;#39;s not a general capability of cron.) Writing a non-trivial cron spec is not easy.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48371674&quot; title=&quot;How do you express those things in a systemd timer? E.g. run something 4x per day, */6 in cron.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable use cases for these timers range from automated backup strategies to creative maintenance tasks, such as scheduling a weekly high-color print job to prevent printer nozzle clogs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48369628&quot; title=&quot;Moved from cronie to systemd timers because they are resilient to system startup times. My backup strategy is to create a borg archive entry every day at a fixed time. With cronie the system needs to be running at the scheduled time, but systemd timer tolerates this and runs the service as soons as the system is available. Btw this is my repo for the backup automation: https://github.com/gchamon/borg-automated-backups&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48370118&quot; title=&quot;I have a Canon printer, I actually can&amp;#39;t trust that their print nozzle won&amp;#39;t get jammed up after sitting idle for a while. So I had claude setup a systemd script to print a picture of my dog every week, I ensure it has enough CMYK spectrum to stress the printer. Its a nice surprise every monday as I sit on my desk to see a sudden picture pop up from the printer :)&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.techradar.com/pro/quote-of-the-day-by-oracle-co-founder-larry-ellison-citizens-will-be-on-their-best-behavior-because-were-constantly-recording-and-reporting-everything-that-is-going-on-a-dire-warning-on-the-erosion-of-privacy&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Larry Ellison: &amp;quot;Citizens will be on their best behavior because we’re recording&amp;quot;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techradar.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48373391&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;302 points · 232 comments · by CharlesW&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison warned that the rise of AI-powered surveillance and constant recording will force citizens to be on their &amp;#34;best behavior,&amp;#34; signaling a significant erosion of privacy through automated real-time monitoring. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.techradar.com/pro/quote-of-the-day-by-oracle-co-founder-larry-ellison-citizens-will-be-on-their-best-behavior-because-were-constantly-recording-and-reporting-everything-that-is-going-on-a-dire-warning-on-the-erosion-of-privacy&quot; title=&quot;Quote of the day by Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison: &amp;#39;Citizens will be on their best behavior, because we’re constantly recording and reporting everything that is going on&amp;#39; — a dire warning on the erosion of privacy    Legendary technologist Larry Ellison has outlined a vision for an increasingly aggressive surveillance state in the 21st century    ![](https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p/?c1=2&amp;amp;c2=10055482&amp;amp;cv=4.4.0&amp;amp;cj=1)    [Skip to main…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that Larry Ellison’s vision reflects a shift in big tech toward a sense of entitlement to rule, prioritizing capital and control over democratic values &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48373745&quot; title=&quot;What really gets to me is how big tech isn&amp;#39;t even pretending anymore to serve society. They clearly feel superior to the rest of us and entitled to rule.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374045&quot; title=&quot;And that&amp;#39;s what the Larry Ellisons of the world want. One of the bigger lies ever told is that free-market economies help democratize nations. They don&amp;#39;t. If they did, we would have made massive investments in Eastern Europe after the fall of the Marxist-Leninist governments there. Instead we decided to invest in China and, later, Vietnam, among others. These are two very non-democratic nations. Why did we do that, especially after the Tiananmen Square Massacre? Because it better fit the needs…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. A central concern is that AI removes the labor costs of surveillance, transforming it from a tool for accountability into a scalable, machine-interpreted panopticon that turns citizens into &amp;#34;managed subjects&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374073&quot; title=&quot;I think the really dangerous part here is not just “surveillance bad”. It is that AI removes the labour cost that used to limit surveillance. CCTV was already a problem, but someone still had to watch it, search it, interpret it, escalate it. AI changes that. It makes surveillance searchable, scalable and administratively useful. The shift is from “you may be observed” to “your behaviour can be continuously machine-interpreted”. That changes the moral shape of the state. A democracy can have…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48373656&quot; title=&quot;And of course, the best behavior will be the behavior that poses zero threat to the people in power. What a great future we have ahead of us, my colleagues.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some compare this trajectory to the dystopian monitoring systems in China, others suggest that such surveillance gains traction because it offers a &amp;#34;ground-level appeal&amp;#34; of public order that democratic systems are currently failing to address &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48373767&quot; title=&quot;That is kinda what is going on in China.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48373918&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s definitely people who blindly praise and romanticize China and ignore how dystopian all the monitoring systems there are, there is essentially no privacy. Even chat apps are infiltrated or Chinese run in some way, shape, or form.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48373863&quot; title=&quot;If you frame it this way in your mind you will be surprised when people pick surveillance over public disorder.  If you don&amp;#39;t like that world (I don&amp;#39;t either) you can&amp;#39;t bury your head in the sand about the problems it is solving, you need a &amp;#39;No, but... &amp;#39; framing where you give answers that actually work. There is a ground-level appeal of the China-style panopticon because it delivers public order and clean streets.  Larry didn&amp;#39;t just buy his way to digital dictator by bribing the right people,…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mitmllc.com/blog/apple-rejected-my-dictation-app/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apple rejected my dictation app for using the accessibility API&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mitmllc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48369088&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;297 points · 162 comments · by RZelaya&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple rejected the dictation app WhisperPad for using accessibility APIs to auto-paste text into other applications, leading the developer to release a restricted version on the Mac App Store while distributing the full-featured version independently. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mitmllc.com/blog/apple-rejected-my-dictation-app/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Apple rejected my dictation app for using the accessibility API    URL Source: https://www.mitmllc.com/blog/apple-rejected-my-dictation-app/    Published Time: 2026-05-27T00:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  I built WhisperPad because I needed it. In the fall of 2024 the joints in my fingers started to hurt when I typed. Maybe the bill came due for spending most of my life on a keyboard: a childhood of video games, then 10 years working in tech. It got worse throughout the winter, and by early…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rejection of a dictation app highlights a fundamental tension between Apple’s restrictive &amp;#34;walled garden&amp;#34; and user autonomy, with some arguing that users should migrate to open platforms like Linux to avoid corporate control &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48369395&quot; title=&quot;This is what happens when you run an OS controlled by some random big corporation. I dont mean that it&amp;#39;s the person&amp;#39;s fault, but just that you should not rely on Apple. they allow you to use your computer, but on their terms. Install some GNU/Linux distro and you can do whatever you want.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48369578&quot; title=&quot;No. Changing one&amp;#39;s primary operating system takes time, dedication, and is a lifestyle change, similar to moving somewhere remote. Changing ones AC filter is none of those things. If you and your grandma only rely on the computer for its web browser, then good for you. You have flexibility that is not afforded to most people. But that&amp;#39;s not how a person&amp;#39;s phone works; phones dig a lot deeper into one&amp;#39;s lifestyle, intentionally so. The walled garden was constructed to keep outsiders out, but now…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While critics compare switching operating systems to a difficult lifestyle change, others contend that modern Linux distributions are now user-friendly enough for the average person &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48369466&quot; title=&quot;for most people this is like saying &amp;#39;If you don&amp;#39;t like being oppressed, just move to Antarctica!&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48369564&quot; title=&quot;Maybe more like “Learn how to replace an AC filter by yourself instead of calling an AC repair company” I just installed PopOS on a laptop recently, and… it just worked. There’s an app store for noobs that I think installs flatpaks. GPU drivers just work. Whole disk encryption. Everything just works. I don’t see what else my grandma that just uses Facebook would need. Maybe automatic updates?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48369578&quot; title=&quot;No. Changing one&amp;#39;s primary operating system takes time, dedication, and is a lifestyle change, similar to moving somewhere remote. Changing ones AC filter is none of those things. If you and your grandma only rely on the computer for its web browser, then good for you. You have flexibility that is not afforded to most people. But that&amp;#39;s not how a person&amp;#39;s phone works; phones dig a lot deeper into one&amp;#39;s lifestyle, intentionally so. The walled garden was constructed to keep outsiders out, but now…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. From a technical perspective, some developers acknowledge that Apple’s concerns are valid because the accessibility API is overly broad and poses significant privacy risks, though they criticize the company for failing to provide a more granular permission system &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48371255&quot; title=&quot;I actually had the almost same situation by building an offline voice dictation app for macOS and iOS, and in macOS I was confronted with the exact same situation. However, I would like to point out that Apple isn&amp;#39;t totally wrong here because the accessibility API unfortunately is way too broadly scoped, and because of that you literally get access to everything on the computer like you you can screenshot listen and and move the cursor... This is completely ridiculous and the proper engineering…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48369425&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t want random apps to paste potentially dangerous things into other apps. Its understandable. Imagine a banking app, and for example an IBAN field.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. To bypass App Store limitations, developers suggest distributing independent versions that can verify existing App Store licenses to maintain trust and functionality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48369488&quot; title=&quot;SpaceGremlin (mac alternative to WinDirStat) has a similar thing, where some features only work in the independent &amp;#39;SpaceGremlinPro&amp;#39; version downloaded from their site. However, they do some cool stuff with licensing - you can point it to the app store paid/installed version, and it detects the license and unlocks. If you&amp;#39;re worried about people not trusting payment to you, might be worth seeing if you could implement this, so anyone who bought on the app store can still access the full feature…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lumafield.com/scan-of-the-month/byd&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;CT scans of BYD car parts&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lumafield.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48375824&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;312 points · 140 comments · by viasfo&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lumafield has utilized CT scanning technology to perform a detailed teardown of a BYD electric vehicle, offering a rare look at the Chinese automaker&amp;#39;s internal engineering and manufacturing techniques for a car currently unavailable in the American market. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lumafield.com/scan-of-the-month/byd&quot; title=&quot;Title: BYD    URL Source: https://www.lumafield.com/scan-of-the-month/byd    Published Time: May 30, 2026    Markdown Content:  # Inside BYD: CT Scans of the EV You Can&amp;#39;t Buy in America    ![Image 5: logo](blob:http://localhost/4eb6460ab93a7ae1978320dda45af1eb)    [](https://www.cookiebot.com/en/what-is-behind-powered-by-cookiebot/?utm_source=banner_cb&amp;amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;amp;utm_content=v2)    *   [Consent](https://www.lumafield.com/scan-of-the-month/byd#)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BYD’s high level of vertical integration and use of integrated &amp;#34;E-axles&amp;#34; simplifies vehicle manufacturing and reduces costs, though critics argue this makes repairs significantly more difficult and expensive &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48376277&quot; title=&quot;Nice. Those are small parts, though. The interesting part is the E-axle. BYD builds a unit with an integrated motor, differential, axle, and wheel hubs. That, plus an electronics box and battery, is the power train. This simplifies vehicles considerably. There are E-axle teardown videos. There&amp;#39;s no big secret about how to do this. Copying this is hard for Detroit, because they have a huge investment in &amp;#39;engine plants&amp;#39;.  With this design, BYD doesn&amp;#39;t need standalone engine plants. Tesla ought to…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48376359&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;This simplifies vehicles considerably. On the contrary, this much integration makes repairs nearly impossible, meaning you might have to swap the whole unit(for a lot of $$$) when something small inside it inevitably breaks. Check out the articles published by EVclinic that cover such cases. Aftermarket EV repairs are already big business due to how difficult and expensive the OEMs make it.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377025&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The last company to vertically integrate a car from raw material to finished product at this scale was Ford. Today BYD’s system runs all the way from the lithium mine to the port. Both BYD and Tesla claim to produce around 75% of their components. Ford is at around 25%. Tesla is indeed smaller in scale (cars/year): BYD 4.6M    Ford 4.4M    Tesla 1.6M&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some dismiss Chinese EVs, technicians performing &amp;#34;autopsies&amp;#34; on BYD components report high-quality, heavy-duty engineering that surpasses historical expectations for new market entrants &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48378942&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve got a friend whos a master tech/trainer with our state automotive body, and is HV certified etc for dealing with these cars. He&amp;#39;s currently got a BYD Shark strewn across his workshop for an autopsy. I have to say I&amp;#39;m super impressed with how heavy duty everything is. The control arms, subframes, etc all look good and don&amp;#39;t fit the &amp;#39;chinese car bad&amp;#39; narrative you always hear. The powertrain components all look to be extremely high quality. I&amp;#39;ve poked around a few EV&amp;#39;s with him now, and I do…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48376878&quot; title=&quot;All you need to know is that BYD cars are good enough that the US had to effectively ban them.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite their technical efficiency, some analysts believe BYD would struggle to dominate the U.S. market due to brand perception and the loss of subsidies, potentially positioning them as a niche player similar to Mazda &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377103&quot; title=&quot;I don’t think BYD would be a hit in the US as they are in Europe. It’s an entirely different market. They may be relatively successful just not to the point of taking an important market share, they would probably be like Mazda. Many of the subsides for Chinese EV ended this year too, and they are now realizing price alone is not a differentiator. So even if BYD eventually makes it to the US, they will be priced close to other brands like KIA and Tesla, but without the advantage of the brand…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/microsoft/coreutils&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Coreutils for Windows&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48372853&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;206 points · 212 comments · by gigel82&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft has released a preview of Coreutils for Windows, providing a native, multi-call binary of UNIX-style utilities like grep and find to enable seamless script execution across Windows, Linux, and macOS. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/microsoft/coreutils&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - microsoft/coreutils: Coreutils for Windows: Installer &amp;amp; Packaging    URL Source: https://github.com/microsoft/coreutils    Markdown Content:  UNIX-style core utilities for Windows. The same commands and pipelines you use on Linux, macOS, and WSL - natively.    ### [Install](https://github.com/microsoft/coreutils#install) · [Shell conflicts](https://github.com/microsoft/coreutils#shell-conflicts) · [Windows caveats](https://github.com/microsoft/coreutils#windows-caveats) ·…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The introduction of Coreutils for Windows has sparked debate over long-standing interoperability issues, such as Windows&amp;#39; continued reliance on CRLF line endings, backslashes, and UTF-16 encoding &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48373378&quot; title=&quot;Windows really needs to ditch CRLF and just use LF, and switch from backslashes to forward slashes. Or better yet, just switch everything to full POSIX. In powershell everything is much better than cmd, but it&amp;#39;s just not enough. WSL is generally great, but there are annoying downsides. I often get &amp;#39;catastrophic&amp;#39; crashes and the zone identifier files drive me nuts. Plus it takes so much longer to start VSCode when connecting with WSL, and now you&amp;#39;ve got two file systems. WSL1 was in many ways…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48373911&quot; title=&quot;Windows is also a rare bird in UTF-16. &amp;#39;UTF-16 is used by the Windows API, and by many programming environments such as Java and Qt. The variable-length character of UTF-16, combined with the fact that most characters are not variable-length (so variable length is rarely tested), has led to many bugs in software, including in Windows itself. &amp;#39;UTF-16 is the only encoding (still) allowed on the web that is incompatible with 8-bit ASCII. It has never gained popularity on the web, where it is…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374688&quot; title=&quot;I have absolutely zero sympathy for any tool that is incapable of handling \r\n and only works with \n. Literally absolutely no sympathy. All software accumulates warts over time. Linux is overflowing with horrible warts and tech debt. As is any software that has successfully served customers for decades. But multiple line endings are quite possibly the easiest most trivial thing to support and there is absolutely no negative cost of any kind in doing so. Linux ecosystem chooses to be stubborn…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Users expressed frustration with the inconsistent handling of command name conflicts between Coreutils and native shells like PowerShell, noting that the current implementation relies on unpredictable PATH ordering &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48373260&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Several commands share names with built-ins in CMD and PowerShell. Whether the Coreutils version runs depends on the shell, the PATH order, and (for PowerShell) the alias table. Well this is not very satisfying, what about proving a way where it actually works without us having to guess where the failure root cause happens to be?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48373174&quot; title=&quot;So dir is not shipped due to conflict with built-ins, echo and rmdir are shipped despite conflicts, and sort is deemed not to have a conflict? What is the logic?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48373882&quot; title=&quot;Fully-qualify the path to the target program, and it should be no concern.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that Windows should adopt full POSIX standards to resolve these &amp;#34;warts,&amp;#34; others contend that modern software should simply be robust enough to handle cross-platform differences like line endings without issue &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48373378&quot; title=&quot;Windows really needs to ditch CRLF and just use LF, and switch from backslashes to forward slashes. Or better yet, just switch everything to full POSIX. In powershell everything is much better than cmd, but it&amp;#39;s just not enough. WSL is generally great, but there are annoying downsides. I often get &amp;#39;catastrophic&amp;#39; crashes and the zone identifier files drive me nuts. Plus it takes so much longer to start VSCode when connecting with WSL, and now you&amp;#39;ve got two file systems. WSL1 was in many ways…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374688&quot; title=&quot;I have absolutely zero sympathy for any tool that is incapable of handling \r\n and only works with \n. Literally absolutely no sympathy. All software accumulates warts over time. Linux is overflowing with horrible warts and tech debt. As is any software that has successfully served customers for decades. But multiple line endings are quite possibly the easiest most trivial thing to support and there is absolutely no negative cost of any kind in doing so. Linux ecosystem chooses to be stubborn…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://seths.blog/2026/06/stop-ruining-it/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Stop Ruining It&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (seths.blog)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48368059&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;261 points · 123 comments · by herbertl&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seth Godin argues that positive qualities like customer delight, curiosity, and trust are inherent states that remain only when they are not undermined by poor management or marketing. &lt;a href=&quot;https://seths.blog/2026/06/stop-ruining-it/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Stop ruining it    URL Source: https://seths.blog/2026/06/stop-ruining-it/    Published Time: 2026-06-02T09:03:00+00:00    Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.  Warning: This is a cached snapshot of the original page, consider retry with caching opt-out.    Markdown Content:  Paul McGowan makes [stereos](https://www.psaudio.com/). To paraphrase his insight: The musicality isn’t a feature you add to an amplifier. It’s what’s left when you stop…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current software landscape is characterized by a shift from serving user needs to treating users as mere metrics or &amp;#34;spherical wallets&amp;#34; to be exploited for revenue &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48372646&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not sure when it happened, but there was a definite inflection point some time in my software career, where we all stopped asking &amp;#39;What does the user want to do with their computer?&amp;#39; and moved over to &amp;#39;What do we want the user to do with our software? And, it&amp;#39;s been downhill since then. We stopped treating the user as the driver of the car, and pushed him into the passenger seat. Now users are just along for the ride and they&amp;#39;re going where tech companies are driving, whether they want to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48373020&quot; title=&quot;We stopped considering the user as a human being and started thinking of them as a spherical wallet in a vacuum. The user exists purely as a source of revinue and absolutely no other consideration is given.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. This transition often results in &amp;#34;ruined&amp;#34; user experiences, such as Windows 11&amp;#39;s File Explorer, where functional design is sacrificed for aesthetic &amp;#34;candy&amp;#34; and poorly implemented features like tabs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48370508&quot; title=&quot;This reminds me of trying to use File Explorer in Windows 11.  I wish I could turn all their electron-app &amp;#39;improvements&amp;#39; off, to make it useful again, like it once was..  Case in point:  Explorer now has tabs. I don&amp;#39;t need tabs, I need a single tab, and a window title bar so I can drag the damn thing around.  And.. my single tab, now tries to show the folder name, truncated to a few useless characters, so I now have tabs called &amp;#39;C:\folder\sub1\...&amp;#39;, while the rest of the row is EMPTY SPACE (which…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48370880&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Explorer now has tabs. I don&amp;#39;t need tabs Hey now!  The `nautilus&amp;#39; file browser on linux got me hooked on tabs and for years it&amp;#39;s been a glaring deficiency of File Explorer.  Many tasks involve a collection of directories, and tabs can be ideal for reducing demand for screen space. I concede the the current Windows implementation is poor but I hope they improve it, rather than dumping tabs entirely.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters argue that &amp;#34;customer delight&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;empowerment&amp;#34; are natural states that organizations actively destroy through dysfunctional leadership and the pursuit of KPIs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48371934&quot; title=&quot;In a similar vein, I&amp;#39;ve argued in many a corporate meeting that there&amp;#39;s no such thing as &amp;#39;empowerment&amp;#39;. People start out wanting to achieve things, change things to be better, do a good job. The active issue is disempowerment , created by other people (usually but not always senior) within the organisation. So the question isn&amp;#39;t &amp;#39;how to empower people&amp;#39;, but rather &amp;#39;how to prevent disempowerment of people&amp;#39;. This isn&amp;#39;t always popular, as it shifts the focus and responsibility for different…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48369565&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Customer delight isn’t something we add to our projects. It’s what’s left if we don’t ruin it. my anecdotal experience in this is that getting back X (customer delight / curiosity etc) once you’ve ruined it will usually take longer / be more costly than having just not ruined it in the first place. also, at some point you will ruin it. at that point it’s a question of by how much and if you choose to un-ruin it. sometimes doing nothing is a more useful skill than doing something.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, the rise of AI-generated &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; is seen as a short-term cash-in on brand trust that ultimately leads to long-term engagement collapse &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48370190&quot; title=&quot;As someone who works in marketing, this is extremely true. Right now, LLMs are causing a lot of one-time cashing in of trust. I&amp;#39;ve seen this pattern a bunch: 1. Person builds trust on X/LinkedIn or via an insightful blog/newsletter (substitute your channel of choice here) for a few years because they have unique opinions, interesting stories from personal experience, are entertaining/charismatic, or share data/insights nobody else has. 2. They realize &amp;#39;AI can do this now&amp;#39; and use AI trained on…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/morningstar-values-spacex-780-billion-half-its-ipo-target-2026-06-02/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Morningstar values SpaceX at $780B, half its IPO target&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (reuters.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48373909&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;198 points · 162 comments · by berkeleyjunk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/morningstar-values-spacex-780-billion-half-its-ipo-target-2026-06-02/&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely view the $780B valuation as detached from reality, with some suggesting the company is worth as little as one-tenth of that figure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374164&quot; title=&quot;IMHO, still too much. Someone posted this link [1] recently. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHD8BDFYyGI&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374067&quot; title=&quot;Which is still 10x what it is worth&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant point of contention is the &amp;#34;Musk premium,&amp;#34; with users arguing that the valuation would collapse without his involvement and insider influence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374821&quot; title=&quot;The other day I was thinking: &amp;#39;if Musk disappears tomorrow would the valuation still be in the same ballpark?&amp;#39;. I don&amp;#39;t think so at all. In this context, it feels like even 150 Billions would be a big stretch considering revenue and forecasts. The coming IPOs and numbers are completely detached from reality and we are all in for a crash that will make 2008 look like a walk in the park.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374949&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;If the guy with insider access to the Kleptocracy left would this thing be as valuable&amp;#39; is a resounding NO when you&amp;#39;re selling exploding space ships and a 3rd tier AI, a service that consumers continue to find complicated at best.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a heated debate regarding the potential inclusion of SpaceX in major indices; critics fear this will force retirement funds to &amp;#34;hold the bag&amp;#34; on an overvalued asset, while others argue that index rebalancing naturally mitigates such risks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374306&quot; title=&quot;Additional concern is the push to get it added to indices immediately. Forcing it into our retirement funds, 401ks and IRAs.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374051&quot; title=&quot;Doesn&amp;#39;t matter, as soon as they can they&amp;#39;ll shove it into the indexes, meaning pension funds all over the world will be let holding the bag.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374456&quot; title=&quot;I think this is poor advice. Its share of the index will be relatively small and if it is indeed a dud, the index will organically rebalance. If you’re a long-term investor, this would just be a temporary blip. On the other hand, if this is thr opposite of a dud, you’ll get the benefit of that.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/02/trump-signs-downsized-ai-order-00946389&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Trump signs downsized AI order after weeks of reversals&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (politico.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48372628&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;197 points · 147 comments · by _alternator_&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;President Trump signed a scaled-back executive order focused on promoting AI innovation and security following weeks of internal policy reversals. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/02/trump-signs-downsized-ai-order-00946389&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.whitehouse.gov&amp;amp;#x2F;presidential-actions&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;06&amp;amp;#x2F;promoting-advanced-artificial-intelligence-innovation-and-security&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.whitehouse.gov&amp;amp;#x2F;presidential-actions&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;06&amp;amp;#x2F;prom...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.nytimes.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;06&amp;amp;#x2F;02&amp;amp;#x2F;technology&amp;amp;#x2F;trump-executive-order-ai.html&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely view the executive order as a &amp;#34;door-shutting&amp;#34; maneuver by major AI labs to stifle open-source competition under the guise of safety &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374446&quot; title=&quot;Step 1: Require companies to submit product for &amp;#39;review&amp;#39; Step 2: Complain about how the OSS/Chinese/whatever models are doing releases without approval Step 3: Prohibit, because &amp;#39;safety&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;financial risks&amp;#39;(?) So this is the door-shutting Altman et al have been pushing for eh?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48375330&quot; title=&quot;I loathe Anthropic. many companies don&amp;#39;t contribute to open-source, but for one to be actively hostile to open-source, to the degree they&amp;#39;re lobbying the government to ban it, is uniquely evil. at least these gatekeepers call themselves what they are. scraping CoT won&amp;#39;t stop the advance of Chinese models. neither will a US &amp;#39;ban&amp;#39; on using such models. at this point I&amp;#39;m cheering for DeepSeek or Qwen to catch up to Anthropic. I support anyone who releases open weights.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the order lacks substance beyond voluntary benchmarks and cybersecurity priorities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374416&quot; title=&quot;There doesn&amp;#39;t really seem to be anything of substance in the actual executive order. Section 1 doesn&amp;#39;t say anything Section 2 seems to boil down to: &amp;#39;improve cyber security and maybe use AI if we can find funding for it&amp;#39; Section 3 proposes building a benchmark for evaluating cyber security performance of models that developers can choose to benchmark against. This seems like a good idea, I know Jack Clark has been a huge advocate for government&amp;#39;s getting in with benchmarking. Section 4 says to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others fear it establishes a framework for government-mandated &amp;#34;ideological&amp;#34; censorship and regulatory capture &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374270&quot; title=&quot;So going forward expect US models to respond only in ways considered appropriate by the administration. If people thought models were producing slop before... lol.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48375427&quot; title=&quot;Almost a year ago we got EO 14319 or the &amp;#39;Preventing Woke AI in the Federal Government&amp;#39; that explicitly regulated the &amp;#39;ideology&amp;#39; of LLMs. This Executive Order is just an expansion of the existing censorship framework.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A central point of contention is the 30-day voluntary review period, which critics argue is technically opaque and potentially ineffective against the rapid release of open-weight models from international competitors like China &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374752&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Compounding the problem, labs in China often release dual-use capable models as open-weight. Once a model is open-weight, safeguards that do exist can be removed, making the model available to any state or non-state actor to use for malicious purposes, including the cyber and CBRN misuse those safeguards were built to prevent. https://www.anthropic.com/research/2028-ai-leadership&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374301&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;The final text asks some AI companies to submit their powerful new models to a voluntary government review 30 days before releasing the products to the public, a pause that would give federal agencies some time to gauge what threats the products may pose to sensitive financial, national security and other computer systems.&amp;#39; How specifically does that review work? I want to give federal agency Opus 4.8 now, while 4.7 has been out for a while (leaving Mythos aside for now). They have 30 days to…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48375330&quot; title=&quot;I loathe Anthropic. many companies don&amp;#39;t contribute to open-source, but for one to be actively hostile to open-source, to the degree they&amp;#39;re lobbying the government to ban it, is uniquely evil. at least these gatekeepers call themselves what they are. scraping CoT won&amp;#39;t stop the advance of Chinese models. neither will a US &amp;#39;ban&amp;#39; on using such models. at this point I&amp;#39;m cheering for DeepSeek or Qwen to catch up to Anthropic. I support anyone who releases open weights.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jasonzweig.com/three-ways-to-get-paid/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Three Ways to Get Paid (2018)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jasonzweig.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48373054&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;207 points · 136 comments · by nate&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jason Zweig shares his father’s three-part rule for making a living: lying to those who want lies brings wealth, telling the truth to those who want it provides a living, and telling the truth to those who want lies leads to financial ruin. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jasonzweig.com/three-ways-to-get-paid/&quot; title=&quot;Three Ways to Get Paid    What my father taught me.    [Skip to content](#wp--skip-link--target)    * [Home](https://jasonzweig.com)  * [Articles](https://jasonzweig.com/articles/)  * [Books](https://jasonzweig.com/books/)    [xml version=&amp;#39;1.0&amp;#39; encoding=&amp;#39;UTF-8&amp;#39;?](https://jasonzweig.com/)    * [Home](https://jasonzweig.com)  * [Articles](https://jasonzweig.com/articles/)  * [Books](https://jasonzweig.com/books/)  * [About](https://jasonzweig.com/about/)  * [Newsletter](https://jasonzweig.com/newsletter/)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the tension between professional integrity and the &amp;#34;collective lie&amp;#34; often required to achieve financial success in business &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374112&quot; title=&quot;When I was a dev working with my business-oriented business partner, I had to get used to sitting in meetings where we promised the client the world having no idea if I could accomplish it or not. Made a lot more money than I could have on my own. &amp;#39;Ray, when someone asks you if you&amp;#39;re a god, you say &amp;#39;YES&amp;#39;!!&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48373865&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve told this story before, but it&amp;#39;s relevant. When I worked at BigCo [1], we were interviewing a candidate for a position. He was pretty good, and we were in the process of making him an offer, but he was asking for more money and trying to negotiate his salary higher. I don&amp;#39;t have an issue with this, BigCo has plenty of money, but other people, including a manager, were complaining.  They felt that this is a good job and he shouldn&amp;#39;t be doing this for the money. I, not realizing that this…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that over-promising to clients is a necessary tactic for growth &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374112&quot; title=&quot;When I was a dev working with my business-oriented business partner, I had to get used to sitting in meetings where we promised the client the world having no idea if I could accomplish it or not. Made a lot more money than I could have on my own. &amp;#39;Ray, when someone asks you if you&amp;#39;re a god, you say &amp;#39;YES&amp;#39;!!&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others express concern that this dishonesty leads to immense stress and potential failure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374480&quot; title=&quot;This is often the advice given by senior folks and I think it is somewhat similar to say that you have to &amp;#39;lie a bit on your CV&amp;#39;. Still, I always wonder what would I do if I make these big promises to clients/bosses/management and I fail to deliver. Wouldn&amp;#39;t that be worse than having said &amp;#39;no, I won&amp;#39;t be able to make it in time&amp;#39; from the beginning? For context, I&amp;#39;m early in my career (3 YOE) and I don&amp;#39;t deal with management that much yet (I&amp;#39;m still shielded by my tech lead and PM), so I&amp;#39;m…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374744&quot; title=&quot;The downside is all the stress from unrealistic objectives&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. This dynamic is further complicated by corporate cultures that penalize employees for admitting they work primarily for money rather than passion &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48373865&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve told this story before, but it&amp;#39;s relevant. When I worked at BigCo [1], we were interviewing a candidate for a position. He was pretty good, and we were in the process of making him an offer, but he was asking for more money and trying to negotiate his salary higher. I don&amp;#39;t have an issue with this, BigCo has plenty of money, but other people, including a manager, were complaining.  They felt that this is a good job and he shouldn&amp;#39;t be doing this for the money. I, not realizing that this…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48373407&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s got to be a variant that is a 2x2 matrix of this: Lie to others, lie to yourself (spiral together; either fantastically poor or spectacularly rich) Lie to others, tell yourself the truth (manipulation, morally broke, but materially rich) Tell others the truth, tell yourself the truth (integrity, barely scrape by) Tell others the truth, lie to yourself (be used by the system, usually end up poorly)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://eyeball.rory.codes/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Eyeball&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (eyeball.rory.codes)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48367723&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;245 points · 78 comments · by mrroryflint&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Eyeball is a precision-based clicking game designed for mouse and trackpad users that challenges players to test their accuracy. &lt;a href=&quot;https://eyeball.rory.codes/&quot; title=&quot;Title: eyeball    URL Source: https://eyeball.rory.codes/    Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.  Warning: This is a cached snapshot of the original page, consider retry with caching opt-out.    Markdown Content:  ## heads up    eyeball is built for precision clicking with a mouse or trackpad. you can play on touch, but finger taps aren&amp;#39;t accurate enough to really compete.    eyeball.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users generally find the game engaging, though some noted that the minimalist design makes the objective—clicking a specific point on a line based on a given number—initially difficult to grasp &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48368443&quot; title=&quot;This is fun but you need to put &amp;#39;click the line&amp;#39; higher on the page. It took me a while to figure out what I was looking at.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48373071&quot; title=&quot;Oh that version actually made sense. Going back to our newer game, I realized that I am supposed to figure out where the number given should fall on the line. A case study in modern useability - looks a lot cooler, can&amp;#39;t figure it out.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While many shared high scores &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48370334&quot; title=&quot;I was 0.06% off on eyeball. Beat me: https://eyeball.rory.codes . This is fun!&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48380031&quot; title=&quot;I was 0.67% off on eyeball. Beat me: https://eyeball.rory.codes&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48371441&quot; title=&quot;0.10%, but on a touch screen.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggested adding features like a &amp;#34;training mode&amp;#34; for missed attempts or an iOS version with circular angle bisection &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48370572&quot; title=&quot;Definitely need an iOS version! An angle version on a circle would be nice too.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48369897&quot; title=&quot;Love it! It would be great to have a &amp;#39;training&amp;#39; mode, where you get to repeat ones you miss. This would increase the learning speed. Easy training- repeat the one you just borked  Medium training- cycles through say 5 examples until you get all five within your target range (1%, 0.1%, whatever)&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The thread also highlights a comparison to Matthias Wandel’s classic geometric guessing game and a meta-observation that &amp;#34;share your score&amp;#34; mechanics may drive significant new user registration &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48370982&quot; title=&quot;A modern take on Matthias Wandel&amp;#39;s classic [0], which has you guess a variety of geometric attributes (e.g. angle bisection, centroid locating, shape regularization), not just simple partitioning of a line. [0] https://woodgears.ca/eyeball/index.html&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48372481&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s interesting that there are, at the time I&amp;#39;m commenting, 11 new users commenting on this submission, some commenting multiple times. I wonder what the effect of &amp;#39;share my score&amp;#39; type pages have on account creation.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/c0dejedi/nbd-vram&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Use your Nvidia GPU&amp;#39;s VRAM as swap space on Linux&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377404&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;227 points · 65 comments · by tanelpoder&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The open-source tool `nbd-vram` allows Linux users to utilize Nvidia GPU VRAM as high-speed swap space, providing a faster alternative to SSD swap for systems with limited or soldered RAM. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/c0dejedi/nbd-vram&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - c0deJedi/nbd-vram: Use your NVIDIA GPU&amp;#39;s VRAM as swap space on Linux. Built for laptops with soldered memory and no upgrade path. If you have an RTX card sitting there with 8GB of VRAM and you&amp;#39;re getting swapped to SSD, this puts that VRAM to work    URL Source: https://github.com/c0dejedi/nbd-vram    Markdown Content:  Use your NVIDIA GPU&amp;#39;s VRAM as swap space on Linux.    Built for laptops with soldered memory and no upgrade path. If you have an RTX card sitting there with 8GB of VRAM…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users question the utility of swapping to high-cost VRAM &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377698&quot; title=&quot;I mean, cool, but I’d rather not?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48378090&quot; title=&quot;use your car for an anchor on a big boat!&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue it is a practical way to utilize idle resources on machines with soldered memory or during non-gaming tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377699&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Built for laptops with soldered memory and no upgrade path. If you have an RTX card sitting there with 8GB of VRAM and you&amp;#39;re getting swapped to SSD, this puts that VRAM to work. Well, that does at least answer my immediate question about why I would ever swap from expensive RAM to really expensive RAM:) Feels niche, but when you want it it&amp;#39;s a good idea.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48378222&quot; title=&quot;Another possible reason that occurred to me: what if you have VRAM but you&amp;#39;re not using it all the time? For example, let&amp;#39;s say you bought a GPU because you like to play video games. When you&amp;#39;re not actively gaming, you probably don&amp;#39;t need 16 GB of VRAM just to render the desktop. Might as well use it for something else, right? Edit: Although, this is predicated on the system being able to release VRAM that is acting as swap when it&amp;#39;s time to start a game. Can it do that?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377823&quot; title=&quot;Given my dev machine has 32GB of RAM and 32GB of VRAM that sits mostly idle when I&amp;#39;m not running AI models, this is not that bad of an idea.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant technical critique notes that current implementations achieve only ~1.3 GB/s throughput, which is slower than modern NVMe drives despite the massive theoretical bandwidth of PCIe 4.0 and GDDR6 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48378117&quot; title=&quot;Nice idea, but something has gone very wrong here: &amp;gt;Sequential throughput: ~1.3 GB/s [on a RTX 3070 Laptop] This RTX 3070 chip is on PCIe 4.0 x16 which should give 64GB/s. The 8GB of GDDR6 is 448GB/s. Swapping to an NVMe drive would be twice as fast, but with higher latency.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents highlight that VRAM swap avoids the wear and tear of NAND PE cycles on SSDs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48379982&quot; title=&quot;Swapping to a NVMe will also consume PE cycles on your NAND, ie wearing it out over time. RAM/VRAM don’t degrade from use.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt; and supports modern memory management strategies where swap is used for &amp;#34;equality of reclamation&amp;#34; rather than just emergency overflow &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48378301&quot; title=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40697318 This HN comment and the linked post brought up a lot of good points. The main takeaway is that swap should primarily be considered a mechanism for equality of reclamation, not for emergency extra memory, where equality of reclamation means file-backed pages and anonymous pages are subject to similar criteria for being evicted from physical memory. I used to have zero swap on my Linux desktop and this convinced me to add at least a small swap…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.acdw.net/clojure/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;My thoughts after using Clojure for about a month&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (acdw.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48375393&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;185 points · 95 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After a month of using Clojure to build a static site generator, the author praises the language&amp;#39;s cohesive design, pragmatic standard library, and ergonomic data structures while noting minor hurdles like increased syntax and a lack of Java knowledge. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.acdw.net/clojure/&quot; title=&quot;Title: My thoughts after using Clojure for about a month    URL Source: https://www.acdw.net/clojure/    Markdown Content:  I am now generating this website with Clojure (yes, _right after_ rewriting it in [GNU Make and shell](https://www.acdw.net/things-i-like-about-my-site/); I have a problem, ok?). In a personal tradition, I used **writing a static site generator** as the project to play with and learn Clojure as a new language. While I’ve long scoffed at Clojure for its copious syntax (_three_…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether a language&amp;#39;s value lies in its syntax and design philosophy or its underlying runtime capabilities. Some argue that Clojure’s functional paradigm and data structures offer a unique approach to problem-solving &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48376947&quot; title=&quot;The functional paradigm is a bit uncomfortable at first, but it does make problem solving feel... different. I personally find OOP to be the most intuitive for large scale systems design, but that&amp;#39;s just me. Most models do not perform particularly well in Clojure, but OpenAI models fully utilize the power of the language. Subjectively, it kind of seems to match the personality. Data at https://gertlabs.com/rankings?provider=openai&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend that runtime features like Erlang’s &amp;#34;share-nothing&amp;#34; actor model and effortless concurrency are more critical than syntax &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377093&quot; title=&quot;With respect, this topic in particular has been beaten to death. I too liked Clojure when I tried it some years ago (agreed on the composition and data structures; both are _great_). But the real value-add is in the runtime, not the syntax. Java has a solid runtime but it&amp;#39;s not yet as good as Erlang&amp;#39;s, maybe even not up to the standards of Golang -- I am talking concurrency / parallelism here (for memory management I have no doubts Java is very good). And I know: green threads and stuff. Well,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377795&quot; title=&quot;I mean runtime guarantees and features. In this case: effortless / near-invisible concurrency and parallelism. As mentioned, I did like Clojure. I&amp;#39;d switch to it if it was running inside the Erlang runtime (like Elixir does).&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48378493&quot; title=&quot;Thousands of share-nothing actors (fibers / green-threads) with first-class support for communication between them, for a start. Erlang/Elixir -- immutability as well.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. This sparked a debate on whether programming languages fundamentally dictate system architecture &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48378062&quot; title=&quot;The programming language informs the design of the system. As I said in my earlier comment, an idiomatic Java codebase is going to be designed very differently to an idiomatic Clojure codebase, even if they both intend to solve the same problem.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt; or if syntax is merely a &amp;#34;vehicle&amp;#34; for abstract concepts that remain identical across different runtimes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377949&quot; title=&quot;To be clear, I&amp;#39;m not questioning your choice of runtime or language. I&amp;#39;m just curious why you think that &amp;#39;Programming language syntax scarcely matters&amp;#39;, as to me that seems the same as saying &amp;#39;How a codebase is architectured and designed scarcely matters&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377983&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t see how the latter follows from the former? The former is much bigger and more abstract; syntax is just one of the vehicles to try and codify it. F.ex. if you have an universal construct of green threads / fibers then 7 PLs could express it 7 different ways, yet underneath they&amp;#39;d all be the same.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, users discussed the ergonomics of Clojure&amp;#39;s nested parentheses, noting that tools like Paredit can mitigate the difficulty of navigating complex block ends &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48376977&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I do wish there were an easier way to move in the ]}]})))}-ness of block ends though. I’m not quite sure what this means. How is it different/worse than all parens..? fyi I use paredit and just hit ) and it moves me past any kind of paren/bracket. But even without that you can just hit left and right..?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.ammaraskar.com/github-token-stealing/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1-Click GitHub Token Stealing via a VSCode Bug&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.ammaraskar.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48371562&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;228 points · 31 comments · by ammar2&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A vulnerability in VSCode’s webview security model allows attackers to steal GitHub OAuth tokens by simulating user keystrokes to install malicious extensions. By clicking a single link to a crafted repository, users can unknowingly grant an attacker full read and write access to their private GitHub repositories. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.ammaraskar.com/github-token-stealing/&quot; title=&quot;Title: 1-Click GitHub Token Stealing via a VSCode Bug    URL Source: https://blog.ammaraskar.com/github-token-stealing/    Published Time: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 16:11:34 GMT    Markdown Content:  Just by clicking a link, it’s possible for an attacker to steal a GitHub token that can read and **write** to your repos, including **private ones**.    ### Table of Contents    *   [Background](https://blog.ammaraskar.com/github-token-stealing/#background)  *   [VSCode Webview Security…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The vulnerability highlights a fundamental security flaw in the &amp;#34;original sin&amp;#34; of signing web-embedded VSCode editors into GitHub by default, which creates a massive attack surface that could be mitigated by using temporary, per-repo permission scopes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48379467&quot; title=&quot;This is a very good writeup. Zooming way out (perhaps to the point of useless observation), it&amp;#39;s a pity that the web embedded VSCode editor is signed into GitHub at all . Defense-in-depth or not, a huge vulnerability surface arises from that original sin. It&amp;#39;d be like if you had a god-permissioned GitHub API token stored in world-readable plaintext on your workstation for the malicious-NPM-package-of-the-week to find. In a perfect world, it&amp;#39;d be awesome if the in-browser IDE launched with a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48379838&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; temporary per-repo permission scope or token that allowed only pull and push to the repo in question How about pull from the repo but only push to a staging area from which the user, but not the token, can push for real? Frankly, LLM agents should do this too. Letting your LLM push seems foolhardy to me.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters expressed significant frustration with the Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC), alleging a pattern of &amp;#34;silently fixing&amp;#34; bugs to avoid paying bounties or providing credit to researchers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48379501&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; the last time I interacted with MSRC regarding reporting a VSCode bug, it was a horrible experience where they silently fixed the bug Classic MSRC. It has figured out that researchers will report for free regardless. Why change?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48379901&quot; title=&quot;MSRC doesn’t fix bugs. I don’t know the specifics of this case, but I’ve managed bug bounty programs in the past through Bountysource and HackerOne. One thing that occasionally happens is that a report makes its way to the development team before the security team has fully assessed it, in this case MSRC. At that point, a developer may decide to quietly fix the issue. Sometimes that’s driven by a concern, rational or not, that being associated with a security bug could reflect poorly on them or…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48379625&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; instead of clout I&amp;#39;m catching up on the infosec twitter side but it seems like it was even worse. A lot of people have the same story as me in 2023 of &amp;#39;they silently patch the bug and don&amp;#39;t even credit you&amp;#39; which really stinks.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Personal anecdotes underscore the inevitability of token theft over time, with one user describing the &amp;#34;violating&amp;#34; experience of having stolen credentials used for crypto mining and spam &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48380077&quot; title=&quot;I had this happen to me recently github token got stolen and also cloudflare tokens guys even if you take security seriously you are going to get hit on a long enough time frame best thing to do is segregate and control damage trust no one, nothing, use orbstack, and always operate under the assumption that your token is going to get leaked at some point it knocked off my entire momentum. fortunately seemed like it was just a spam bot that took my tokens and created bunch of fake spam pages and…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48380288&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; created bunch of fake spam pages and trying to mine crypto Pages like GitHub pages? We’re repos being created in your account? Curious how you discovered that your tokens were pwned&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-06-01</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-06-01</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.0xsid.com/blog/meta-account-takeover-fiasco&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The newest Instagram “exploit” is the goofiest I&amp;#39;ve seen&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0xsid.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359102&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1548 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 363 comments · by ssiddharth&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hackers are reportedly exploiting Meta’s AI support bot to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized access to Instagram accounts. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.0xsid.com/blog/meta-account-takeover-fiasco&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;krebsonsecurity.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;06&amp;amp;#x2F;hackers-used-metas-ai-support-bot-to-seize-instagram-accounts&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;krebsonsecurity.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;06&amp;amp;#x2F;hackers-used-metas-ai-su...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Instagram exploit highlights a fundamental tension between &amp;#34;fail safe&amp;#34; recovery, which prevents permanent lockouts, and &amp;#34;fail secure&amp;#34; protocols that prioritize account integrity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48362003&quot; title=&quot;A flow can either fail safe or fail secure. Fail secure: if you lose your email, your account is forever locked. Fail safe: if you lose your email, your account is not forever locked. But, someone else might be able to get your account by pretending you lost your email. There are no other choices. When the electronic door controller loses power, either the door stays locked, or the door stays unlocked. In case of a fire you want it unlocked so people can get out. But then a burglar can cut the…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359557&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a tough problem, because people forget passwords, change phones, lose access to 2FA devices, but still need to use their accounts.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the flaw stems from a poorly designed recovery flow that could have been statically coded &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359920&quot; title=&quot;This exploit has essentially nothing to do with AI and everything to do with a terribly designed account recovery flow. This exact same flow could have been (and may have been; I don’t know how much the chatbot here actually does) statically coded.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359356&quot; title=&quot;recovery is always the weakest link in any authentication system&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that giving an AI the tooling to send emails to arbitrary addresses is a unique failure of oversight that bypasses traditional security guardrails &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359575&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s insane the AI has been provided the tooling to send emails to arbitrary addresses like that. Like, getting it to send a 2FA code at a user&amp;#39;s request is one thing. But it should only be able to &amp;#39;hit a button&amp;#39; to send a 2FA email to the address attached to the account, all run with hand-written code. It shouldn&amp;#39;t have access to the 2FA code itself, or the message subject, or body, or the recipient address, etc. Why did they give it any of that?!&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48360328&quot; title=&quot;This is not true. Well, it kinda is, but nobody will be stupid enough to hand-code an account recovery where you get to type any email address. The reason it worked there is that the designers of the system didn&amp;#39;t anticipate that the AI will agree to accept any email (maybe they even put guardrails against it in the system prompt, we don&amp;#39;t know). It&amp;#39;s more like social engineering than bad-security-code, except that like the sibling comment said an actual human will probably not approve that.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters note that account recovery has long been the weakest link in security, often compromised by low-level support staff or outsourced labor who can be bribed or social-engineered into disabling 2FA &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359309&quot; title=&quot;Support requests have always been the weakest link in the security chain for big corps. I&amp;#39;ve had accounts of mine turned over with 2FA disabled by humans before. I guess we shouldn&amp;#39;t be surprised that the LLMs are doing the same thing. The simple fact that 2FA can be removed by low level support staff drives me mad. It defeats the whole purpose of the process.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48360290&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m among the first 6000 users of Instagram and my first name username was stolen a few years ago. Support for verified accounts acknowledged the issue, but couldn&amp;#39;t do anything about it. This turn was an AI exploit, in my case was an outsourcing support &amp;#39;exploit&amp;#39;, where someone paid for my username to be manually changed and given to another user. There will always be a way to get access to accounts if human accountable support doesn&amp;#39;t exist, with criminal consequences for employees that…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. To mitigate these risks, users suggest a return to physical verification methods, such as visiting a bank branch or using a notary, though tech companies avoid these due to the high operational costs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48363440&quot; title=&quot;There are no other online choices. If my Bank login goes totally Kaput, though, I can take my ID down to the Branch to get it sorted. Same with my telecom provider. I try to only depend on services which have this property. I don&amp;#39;t succeed.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359839&quot; title=&quot;This is not wrong but what’s really missing is cost: Meta did this so they can avoid paying people to do it. Lots of companies follow that decay spiral: your bank could shut phishers down cold by requiring wire transfers to be authorized in person but they don’t want to pay staff or risk you being upset by a transaction taking an extra hour so they don’t. Imagine an alternate universe where big tech companies worked with various trustworthy third-parties where something like this would generate…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/RedHatInsights/javascript-clients/issues/492&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Malicious npm packages detected across Red Hat Cloud Services&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48356625&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;740 points · 421 comments · by kurmiashish&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Security researchers have detected multiple malicious npm package releases within the `@redhat-cloud-services` scope, affecting dozens of libraries including chrome, frontend components, and various service clients. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/RedHatInsights/javascript-clients/issues/492&quot; title=&quot;[SECURITY]: Malicious npm releases detected across `@redhat-cloud-services/` scope · Issue #492 · RedHatInsights/javascript-clients    Ref: https://www.stepsecurity.io/blog/multiple-redhat-cloud-services-npm-packages-compromised https://app.stepsecurity.io/oss-security-feed?q=@redhat-cloud-services Affected Packages (updated) Pack...    [Skip to content](#start-of-content)    ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a consensus that npm’s default behavior of running arbitrary post-install scripts as the logged-in user is a major security flaw &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48356891&quot; title=&quot;Let me provide context, since a bunch of people responding with &amp;#39;every package manager can be hit!!!&amp;#39; npm, by design, allows all packages to run package supplied arbitrary code as the logged-in user after an update completes. That&amp;#39;s an INSANE default. pnpm, by contrast, allows you to essentially &amp;#39;opt-in&amp;#39; only specific packages that need this (e.g. four out of thirty, in one of our projects). Then tacks on tons of other security settings, like minimum age, no trust downgrade, etc etc. All…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48357059&quot; title=&quot;Nearly every package manager I&amp;#39;ve ever used had post-install scripts. Most run as root, since that&amp;#39;s what usually what the package manager runs as. It&amp;#39;s not unreasonable: you&amp;#39;re already installing software, which presents risks. If post-install scripts were not a thing, a payload could still run because you ran the software you installed. Or because the installer added it to auto-run. Or because the installer placed it somewhere where it would be dynamically loaded all the time.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue all package managers share these risks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48356806&quot; title=&quot;All programming language package managers are vulnerable. They all have the exact same caveats as the Arch Linux User Repository. There are no trusted maintainers taking responsibility for things. Any random person can make an account and push packages.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others point to pnpm and Yarn 4 as safer alternatives that offer &amp;#34;cooldown&amp;#34; periods to block new, potentially malicious releases until they are vetted &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48356891&quot; title=&quot;Let me provide context, since a bunch of people responding with &amp;#39;every package manager can be hit!!!&amp;#39; npm, by design, allows all packages to run package supplied arbitrary code as the logged-in user after an update completes. That&amp;#39;s an INSANE default. pnpm, by contrast, allows you to essentially &amp;#39;opt-in&amp;#39; only specific packages that need this (e.g. four out of thirty, in one of our projects). Then tacks on tons of other security settings, like minimum age, no trust downgrade, etc etc. All…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48356771&quot; title=&quot;Our company uses yarn 4 which has an option to prevent you from installing an npm package for the first number of days of its release. Most of these seem to be caught within that timeframe (1-3 days). https://gist.github.com/mcollina/b294a6c39ee700d24073c0e5a4e...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48358190&quot; title=&quot;Hope it&amp;#39;s ok I hijack this thread again about setting up cooldowns... (copy pasting my last comment when tanstack was compromised): I know people have opinions about cooldowns, but they would have saved you from axios, tanstack, (+ @redhat-cloud-services) and many other recent npm supply chain attacks. If you have Artifactory / Nexus, you probably already have cooldowns, but it&amp;#39;s easy to set up if you don&amp;#39;t.  Why cooldowns? Most npm (or pypi) compromises were taken down within hours, cooldowns…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. To combat these supply chain attacks, experts recommend adopting MFA, trusted publishers, and staged publishing to ensure updates are verified before reaching users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48360014&quot; title=&quot;In every of these threads there&amp;#39;s a bunch of snarky comments, either acting like this class of attack is exclusive to npm, or that nothing has been done about it. I don&amp;#39;t think that&amp;#39;s fair. There&amp;#39;s plenty of comments mentioning delay lines, and the other good stuff pnpm (and others) have implemented in response to protect package consumers. That bit that&amp;#39;s getting less conversation is the tools on the package maintainer side: - MFA for publishing:…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://point.free/blog/gemma-4-on-a-2016-xeon/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A 10 year old Xeon is all you need&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (point.free)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48353348&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;685 points · 273 comments · by cafkafk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By utilizing highly optimized software forks and advanced configuration flags like speculative decoding and Flash Attention, a 2016 Intel Xeon server with slow DDR3 RAM can successfully run a modern 26-billion-parameter Mixture-of-Experts AI model at reading speeds without a GPU. &lt;a href=&quot;https://point.free/blog/gemma-4-on-a-2016-xeon/&quot; title=&quot;Title: A 10 year old Xeon is all you need - point.free    URL Source: https://point.free/blog/gemma-4-on-a-2016-xeon/    Published Time: 2026-06-01T00:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  Published on June 01, 2026    17 minutes read    The [previous post](https://point.free/blog/gemma-4-mtp/) covered getting Gemma 4’s MTP drafters quantized and paired with a verifier. This one is about running the result on a machine that has no business running it.    I have a recycled server. To its credit, it has a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users successfully demonstrated that a decade-old Xeon server can run modern 26B MoE models at &amp;#34;reading speed&amp;#34; (approx. 12 tokens per second) by utilizing specific software forks and performance levers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48353366&quot; title=&quot;Hi HN. I wrote this post after getting frustrated by the lack of ways to run the new Gemma 4 Drafter models, and mainstream tools not prioritizing this, and hiding all the performance levers. I ended up getting a modern 26B MoE model (Gemma 4) running at reading speed on an old recycled server with a single Xeon E5-2620 v4 and 128GB of DDR3 RAM (and no GPU). It took a lot of work, but it actually worked out somehow. I&amp;#39;ve also linked the quants at the end, but they&amp;#39;re not gonna run unless you…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48353675&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; (purple on black is really hard to read) Noted, and agree (it looks like it has also already been clicked, which I dislike). I honestly I need to redo the themes. &amp;gt; You say it runs &amp;#39;at reading speed&amp;#39;. Have you benchmarked it? At some point a few weeks ago, yes I think so, but I didn&amp;#39;t write it down for some reason... so I&amp;#39;ll have to find a time when it&amp;#39;s not busy and do it again without a noisy system. Right now the system is noisy, but that said doing it like this: llama-cli --model…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that local &amp;#34;good enough&amp;#34; hardware will eventually implode the current cloud-based AI business model &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48355743&quot; title=&quot;We’re not there yet, but the obvious endgame of the present bubble insanity is open models running on local hardware and devices are “good enough” for most use cases. That will completely implode what’s going on at the moment in tech.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48355940&quot; title=&quot;This. OpenAI and Anthropic are ultimately compute infrastructure plays and not really AI. Everyone will have models, they&amp;#39;ll have the ability to run them. This is why the GPU shortage is in their favor.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that local hosting is a niche pursuit similar to running a blog on a laptop rather than a threat to major infrastructure providers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48355826&quot; title=&quot;this is sorta like saying that being able to run your blog on your laptop will completely implode the cloud business&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Concerns remain regarding the economic practicality of this approach, specifically the high energy consumption and noise levels of vintage servers compared to cheap API alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48354961&quot; title=&quot;Nice post and technically impressive work. I agree we need to understand the build pipeline and be able to do things locally. However, depending on your electricity cost, it might not make sense financially. These old servers are not energy efficient at all (I&amp;#39;m guessing that old Xeon server will easily pull 200W on load), and that model is currently at 0.1$/0.3$ per 1M tokens (with 76 tps and 262k context) in Openrouter (also, these servers are LOUD). EDIT: I stand corrected, 200W is…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48354452&quot; title=&quot;How many watts is that setup? Cool you got it to work, but maybe only useful for vintage / retro computing rather than practical if the energy consumption makes it economically wasteful.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/news/confidential-draft-s1-sec&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Anthropic confidentially submits draft S-1 to the SEC&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (anthropic.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48358646&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;472 points · 385 comments · by surprisetalk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AI startup Anthropic has confidentially filed a draft registration statement with the SEC for a potential initial public offering. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/news/confidential-draft-s1-sec&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.reuters.com&amp;amp;#x2F;business&amp;amp;#x2F;ai-giant-anthropic-confidentially-files-us-ipo-2026-06-01&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.reuters.com&amp;amp;#x2F;business&amp;amp;#x2F;ai-giant-anthropic-confiden...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.nytimes.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;06&amp;amp;#x2F;01&amp;amp;#x2F;technology&amp;amp;#x2F;anthropic-ipo.html&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.nytimes.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;06&amp;amp;#x2F;01&amp;amp;#x2F;technology&amp;amp;#x2F;anthropic-ipo....&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The confidential filing is viewed by some as a &amp;#34;mad rush&amp;#34; to go public before a potential market downturn, raising concerns that retail and 401k investors will be left &amp;#34;holding the bag&amp;#34; due to new index listing rules &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48358844&quot; title=&quot;There is a mad rush to get these IPOs out the door before the market sneezes.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361365&quot; title=&quot;Up until this point, the potential for an AI bust blast radius was limited to corporate investors, but this is going to cause regular retail/401k investors to get exposure, which could have far bigger impacts on a downturn. Not to mention the insane wake-up call it is going to be for these AI stocks when 3 months after they launch they have to start making earnings calls and showing their financials. That quarter-by-quarter pressure and scrutiny is no joke, and probably the biggest downside of…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359032&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s more insidious than that. These IPOs aren&amp;#39;t being rushed, they were waiting for all the pieces to be in place to force 401ks and other retirement plans to buy these IPOs. The most recent change was the NASDAQ adopting the &amp;#39;fast change rule&amp;#39; which allows newly IPO&amp;#39;d companies to be listed in the index after only 15 days of trading. This rule was decided March 30, 2026 and only came into effect May 1, 2026. The plan is to rapidly drive these prices up in the first 15 days, get the companies…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some compare the current AI hype to the eventual decline of dotcom giants like AOL, others argue that Anthropic’s strong revenue growth and margins mirror Google’s successful IPO rather than a bubble &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361365&quot; title=&quot;Up until this point, the potential for an AI bust blast radius was limited to corporate investors, but this is going to cause regular retail/401k investors to get exposure, which could have far bigger impacts on a downturn. Not to mention the insane wake-up call it is going to be for these AI stocks when 3 months after they launch they have to start making earnings calls and showing their financials. That quarter-by-quarter pressure and scrutiny is no joke, and probably the biggest downside of…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361720&quot; title=&quot;If we&amp;#39;re doing historical comparisons, there was so much hype for AOL and Yahoo that drove valuations far beyond the economics. In time, the hypesters were proved wrong. In contrast, there was overwhelming doom and gloom for Google&amp;#39;s IPO, in spite of their incredible growth and margin economics. In time, the doomers were proved wrong. There&amp;#39;s so much doom and gloom about Anthropic that directly contradicts their astounding growth and margins. For a long-term investor, Anthropic is looking a lot…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48362229&quot; title=&quot;Reminds me of this...  During Apple&amp;#39;s 1980 Initial Public Offering (IPO), Massachusetts regulators banned residents from purchasing the stock. The state&amp;#39;s securities regulators deemed the offering &amp;#39;too risky&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;over-valued,&amp;#39; enforcing a state rule that prohibited IPOs with a price exceeding 25 times earnings.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant speculation regarding how public market pressure and trillion-dollar valuations might compromise the company&amp;#39;s ethos or lead to aggressive monopolistic behavior &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48358831&quot; title=&quot;If OpenAI and Anthropic eventually become public companies with trillion-dollar valuations, it will be interesting to see if their company ethos remains the same.  With that much purchasing power, it&amp;#39;s very tempting to gobble up competitors and raise prices.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359244&quot; title=&quot;They already do both. The real competition is coming out of China right now and I doubt the Chinese government is going to let them buy out their &amp;#39;fast follower&amp;#39; AI companies that are consistently 6-12 months behind in terms of quality. That said, I&amp;#39;m factoring quality as in Opus 4.5/Sonnet 4.5/GPT-5.5 as break points since I haven&amp;#39;t really seen an improvement since that point when using AI.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://torrentfreak.com/the-pirate-bay-remains-resilient-20-years-after-the-raid/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Pirate Bay Remains Resilient, 20 Years After the Raid&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (torrentfreak.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48357154&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;541 points · 260 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Twenty years after a major 2006 police raid prompted by U.S. government pressure, The Pirate Bay remains operational, having survived multiple criminal investigations, founder convictions, and a second raid to become the world&amp;#39;s most resilient torrent site. &lt;a href=&quot;https://torrentfreak.com/the-pirate-bay-remains-resilient-20-years-after-the-raid/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Pirate Bay Remains Resilient, 20 Years After The Raid    URL Source: https://torrentfreak.com/the-pirate-bay-remains-resilient-20-years-after-the-raid/    Published Time: 2026-05-31T20:56:38+00:00    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1](https://torrentfreak.com/images/thepirate-e1470829181981.jpg)    There are a handful of traditions we have at TorrentFreak, and remembering the first raid on The Pirate Bay is one of them.    It was not only the first major story we covered, it also shaped how the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users argue that piracy remains a superior experience to legal streaming due to technical failures like missing audio tracks, poor AI upscaling, and the removal of &amp;#34;offensive&amp;#34; episodes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48358134&quot; title=&quot;Every once in a while I&amp;#39;ll try to watch something through the Intended Method™ and it always proves itself to be a worse experience. Most recent example - I was watching Malcolm in the Middle on Disney+ with my girlfriend, and we found that there are entire audio tracks missing in multiple episodes. Usually some kind of ADR, like someone talking off camera. There&amp;#39;s an episode where Reese rents an apartment and there&amp;#39;s a recurring bit of him talking to his depressed neighbour through the wall.…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48358570&quot; title=&quot;Not to go off on a complete tangent, but... &amp;gt;... like the infamous Duff Beer joke being out of frame in The Simpsons. My collection of The Simpsons, seasons 1-13, are all TV rips from waaaaayyyyy back in the 00&amp;#39;s. Sure, it&amp;#39;s not super high-quality, but at least they don&amp;#39;t look like the ugly remasters (on some of the ones I&amp;#39;ve tried watching on Disney+, they look like someone&amp;#39;s drawn over the old cells), the aspect ratio is the original so nothing&amp;#39;s missing and, as a personal bonus, they&amp;#39;ve got…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some find The Pirate Bay stagnant or irrelevant for high-quality remuxes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48357756&quot; title=&quot;When it comes to films, I torrent exclusively remuxes or whole Blu-Ray images. TPB hasn&amp;#39;t been relevant for me for the last 15 years or more, since it never had a culture of such large file sizes, just small re-encodes. I wonder why, because obviously that data doesn&amp;#39;t have to pass through TPB&amp;#39;s own servers.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48357424&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; For now, the site remains online, twenty years after Hollywood thought it had seen the last of it. And whoever is in charge today, will likely do everything possible to keep it that way. I&amp;#39;m vaguely aware that other people than the original group are running it now. Also, I don&amp;#39;t torrent much, but it seems pretty stagnant and dead. It&amp;#39;s been occasionally useful to me to find older stuff that doesn&amp;#39;t seem to be well represented on newer (public) sites.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others maintain that &amp;#34;buying&amp;#34; digital media is misleading because DRM restricts playback to specific devices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48358786&quot; title=&quot;A recent experience I had was : 1. buy movie on iTunes  2. have kids that can&amp;#39;t do long distance drives  3. obtain dvd players for car  4. realized I can&amp;#39;t play films that I &amp;#39;bought&amp;#39; on DVD players It feels like the &amp;#39;Buy&amp;#39; button on iTunes/Apple TV is misleading, and should be renamed to &amp;#39;License to watch on Apple devices&amp;#39;. Obvious in hindsight, but this type of DRM severely restricts use cases.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48358921&quot; title=&quot;While I agree with you in spirit... were you expecting that you could... burn the film to a DVD or something? Of course buying a movie on itunes means you can only watch it on capable devices. You can&amp;#39;t play a youtube video on a VHS player either.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. For building reliable collections, commenters recommend alternatives such as private trackers, Usenet, or ripping physical media from libraries &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48358154&quot; title=&quot;I honestly wouldn’t bother with public trackers. They work great for debrid services with something like kodi or stremio but if you want to “own” or build your collection you have much better options   1. Private trackers - people seed, they have rules on uploads and actually moderate 2. Usenet is still alive and thriving for this. 3. Libraries still exist and you can rent and rip media there 4.Internet Archive is a great resource for old stuff 5. Just buy physical copies and rip em. Can check…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/products/rtx-spark/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Nvidia RTX Spark&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nvidia.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48352939&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;370 points · 360 comments · by shenli3514&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nvidia has debuted its new RTX Spark N1 and N1X processors for Windows laptops and desktops, positioning the AI-capable chips to compete directly against hardware from Intel, AMD, and Apple. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/products/rtx-spark/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.theverge.com&amp;amp;#x2F;tech&amp;amp;#x2F;940589&amp;amp;#x2F;nvidia-rtx-spark-n1-n1x-laptop-desktop-pc-cpu-gpu-ai-release-date&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.theverge.com&amp;amp;#x2F;tech&amp;amp;#x2F;940589&amp;amp;#x2F;nvidia-rtx-spark-n1-n1x...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;finance.yahoo.com&amp;amp;#x2F;markets&amp;amp;#x2F;article&amp;amp;#x2F;nvidia-debuts-rtx-spark-processor-for-windows-laptops-taking-aim-at-intel-amd-053000567.html&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nvidia’s RTX Spark is viewed as a strategic move to dominate local AI inference and compete with Apple’s hardware, potentially shifting the competitive landscape away from cloud-based providers like OpenAI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361313&quot; title=&quot;This seems to be an attempt to compete with people running local models on Apple hardware—even though those local Mac Mini setups aren&amp;#39;t really powerful. I expect we&amp;#39;ll get there in a few years, so perhaps this is Nvidia taking an early step in that direction. In that case, this goes against Anthropic and OpenAI&amp;#39;s business models. Which is a double whammy after Jensen Huang&amp;#39;s recent comment about how agentic coding will only increase demand for software engineers, not reduce it. So it also…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48355844&quot; title=&quot;I’m getting more and more convinced that we will end up running LLMs in our personal computers. Which makes me wonder where Anthropic/OpenAIs moats will come from.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361946&quot; title=&quot;Local AI was/is bound to happen, eventually. It&amp;#39;d be smart of Nvidia to get ahead of it. Non-techy consumers may never do it, but at some point businesses are going to start asking when do they stop paying per token and start running models themselves. Right now the hardware is cost prohibitive, but I doubt that&amp;#39;ll always be the case. Eventually the hardware will get cheaper and more available, and Nvidia seems to be betting on that. They don&amp;#39;t care where inference happens, so long as it…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users remain skeptical of Windows as a platform due to past ARM compatibility issues and privacy concerns, others highlight Nvidia&amp;#39;s significant industry clout in securing native ARM ports for major creative suites and games &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48363645&quot; title=&quot;Lots of comments are expressing skepticism about compatibility but it&amp;#39;s pretty cool how Nvidia has the clout to convince a bunch of game publishers and creative apps to release Arm versions. Popular games like League of Legends as well as stuff like Adobe Photoshop and Premiere are getting native Arm ports. &amp;gt; Over 100 Windows software providers such as Adobe, Blackmagic Design, Blender, CapCut, ComfyUI and OTOY, and game developers such as KRAFTON, NetEase, Remedy Entertainment, Riot Games and…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361150&quot; title=&quot;Honestly this looks like Microsoft must have thrown a pile of money at them to not mention it, as it&amp;#39;s just too obviously the main question. No one seriously cares about this running Windows. We want Steam and CUDA/Ollama, and Windows just gets in the way. nVidia are simply not that oblivious, but I have to admit in their position I&amp;#39;d have considered the Microsoft involvement more trouble than it&amp;#39;s worth, which is among the many reasons I&amp;#39;m not a billionaire. Maybe they think the RAM market is…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48353048&quot; title=&quot;It all sounds good on paper. But I have trouble believing Windows can be a good platform for this. Microsoft has lost all trust after inserting ads into windows, slowly removing power user features, and exploiting every dark pattern they can. And for years, the ARM based Windows laptops have been useless due to app compatibility issues. Why would this change now? Is it priced to be a lot cheaper than Apple’s laptops? Or is this a niche product for AI developers basically?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A central debate persists regarding whether local hardware can ever be as economical as centralized data centers for running high-end models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361946&quot; title=&quot;Local AI was/is bound to happen, eventually. It&amp;#39;d be smart of Nvidia to get ahead of it. Non-techy consumers may never do it, but at some point businesses are going to start asking when do they stop paying per token and start running models themselves. Right now the hardware is cost prohibitive, but I doubt that&amp;#39;ll always be the case. Eventually the hardware will get cheaper and more available, and Nvidia seems to be betting on that. They don&amp;#39;t care where inference happens, so long as it…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48355894&quot; title=&quot;Convince me 1. in order to run LLMs, especially the best ones, you need complicated devices which are expensive 2. if you buy one for your personal use, you are probably not going to utilize it all the time and it will be idle a lot It seems to me that it will always be more economical that the LLM-running devices are in a datacenter where it is easier to make sure they are always utilized&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2026/06/01/can-the-stockmarket-swallow-anthropic-spacex-and-openai&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Can the stockmarket swallow Anthropic, SpaceX and OpenAI?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (economist.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48364055&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;231 points · &lt;strong&gt;437 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by 1vuio0pswjnm7&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The stock market faces the challenge of absorbing massive initial public offerings from high-value private firms like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic as they outgrow private funding and seek public capital to fuel their capital-intensive operations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2026/06/01/can-the-stockmarket-swallow-anthropic-spacex-and-openai&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;nKEVw&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;nKEVw&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The stock market may be forced to absorb these massive valuations due to recent rule changes by index providers that waive profitability requirements, effectively mandating that trillions in passive retirement funds purchase shares at IPO prices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48364978&quot; title=&quot;For SpaceX (and possible the others): Yes it can, since they changed the rules to force over $30 trillion in passive 401k and retirement money to buy SpaceX at IPO valuations. From https://x.com/Hedgeye/status/2060435253928604065 : &amp;#39;Rule changes for the SpaceX $SPCX IPO: Index providers waived the profitability requirement and cut the seasoning window from 90 days to 5. This forces over $30 trillion in passive 401k and retirement money to buy SpaceX at IPO valuations. Bloomberg Intelligence…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue these companies have yet to provide quality-of-life improvements proportional to their valuations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48364917&quot; title=&quot;All these things are apparently valued at trillions of dollars these days. Where&amp;#39;s the trillions, or hundreds of billions worth in improved quality of life? What has gotten better other than the ability to produce more crap?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others point to SpaceX’s cost-efficiency and AI&amp;#39;s breakthroughs in medicine and mathematics as evidence of tangible value &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48365050&quot; title=&quot;In terms of SpaceX (the space portion of it) they&amp;#39;ve produced the cheapest way to get any payload into space. If you pay anybody else, you will overpay drastically depending on who you want to take your payload into space. In terms of AI, we&amp;#39;ve seen even here on HN everything from mathematical problems that remaind unsolved, being solved, mathematical proofs being used to disprove theories, heck we even learned more about alzheimers, new antibiotics, precision targeting in oncology, using AI to…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48365053&quot; title=&quot;Comments like these make me feel like we&amp;#39;re living in different worlds. I use LLMs multiple times a day and they&amp;#39;ve significantly improved my quality of life. They are also steadily becoming more useful over time (e.g. now solving math problems).&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant concern that these firms are racing to IPO before a potential bubble bursts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48364410&quot; title=&quot;So they&amp;#39;re not just racing to gain dominance in AI, they&amp;#39;re also racing to IPO before the music stops? IPOing and getting a bunch of cash, even if your stock subsequently suffers in the crash, is a lot better than being unable to get that capital infusion before the house of cards collapses.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48365031&quot; title=&quot;If this is a bubble... The pop stage will be devastating...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, though some suggest that introducing more large private companies could actually stabilize high market valuations by providing a place for excess capital to flow &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48364458&quot; title=&quot;The way I&amp;#39;ve been thinking about it: there is too much money trying to pour into the market.  That&amp;#39;s why valuations are so high. Maybe getting more of these big private companies public will bring valuations down a bit. (Just my impression.  No math or financial studies behind it :)&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.windowslatest.com/2026/06/01/microsoft-builds-its-ultimate-macbook-pro-rival-with-the-nvidia-powered-surface-laptop-ultra/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft builds MacBook Pro rival with NVIDIA-powered Surface Laptop Ultra&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (windowslatest.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48355720&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;190 points · &lt;strong&gt;399 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by jbk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft has introduced the Surface Laptop Ultra, a high-performance MacBook Pro competitor featuring NVIDIA graphics and designed for creative professionals. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.windowslatest.com/2026/06/01/microsoft-builds-its-ultimate-macbook-pro-rival-with-the-nvidia-powered-surface-laptop-ultra/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.microsoft.com&amp;amp;#x2F;en-us&amp;amp;#x2F;surface&amp;amp;#x2F;devices&amp;amp;#x2F;surface-laptop-ultra&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.microsoft.com&amp;amp;#x2F;en-us&amp;amp;#x2F;surface&amp;amp;#x2F;devices&amp;amp;#x2F;surface-lapt...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;blogs.windows.com&amp;amp;#x2F;devices&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;05&amp;amp;#x2F;31&amp;amp;#x2F;introducing-surface-laptop-ultra-made-for-world-makers&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;blogs.windows.com&amp;amp;#x2F;devices&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;05&amp;amp;#x2F;31&amp;amp;#x2F;introducing-sur...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion reveals deep skepticism toward Surface hardware, with users reporting frequent technical failures such as bricked docks, poor Wi-Fi performance, and &amp;#34;glitchy&amp;#34; system behavior &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48360597&quot; title=&quot;My experience with Surfaces and, particularly, the Surface Book and its accompanying dock were such that I&amp;#39;d have to be paid to use one again. For example, the dock would get its own updates silently and brick itself randomly and the proprietary magnetic connector between the dock and the computer was prone to a poor connection. I remember many occasions trying to work and my screens just randomly blinking in and out. To get service we&amp;#39;d have to go to a local Microsoft Store, a sad replica of…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361697&quot; title=&quot;I worked with some of the people responsible for the Surface Book, Surface docks, and specifically the Surface Book&amp;#39;s dock. These were hardware people (EEs), not software people, and this was after their time at MS. Unfortunately I don&amp;#39;t remember specifics (both because it&amp;#39;s been a few years, and because I&amp;#39;d probably have to fuzz details anyway), but... : Docks are horrifying products. Thunderbolt docks are doubly horrifying. They ordered in every single competing dock they could find, from…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359988&quot; title=&quot;A former employer of mine, owned by a retired NFL player, purchased Surface devices for the sales staff in addition to their laptops. This was presumably because Microsoft and the NFL had a deal where everyone on the sidelines were using Surfaces and they thought it was a good idea. I say that because no one was asking for them, and when we received them I was inundated with tickets about poor performance: &amp;#39;my surface is slow&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;my surface is glitchy&amp;#39;. I dreaded working on these things.…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some praise the physical design, there is a strong consensus that Windows remains a major deterrent, leading many to prefer Linux despite significant compatibility hurdles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48355884&quot; title=&quot;For many, the appeal of a Mac is that it isn&amp;#39;t running Windows. I&amp;#39;m not seeing how this won&amp;#39;t be a repeat of the OG ARM Surface, just with a higher spec&amp;#39;d GPU.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48363942&quot; title=&quot;The Surface line is, HW-wise, very good IMHO. Too bad the software is awful. Thankfully the Linux Surface community is pretty strong.  Proprietary Microsoft drivers don&amp;#39;t make it easy, but we&amp;#39;re getting there... https://github.com/linux-surface/surface-pro-x I&amp;#39;ll buy another one if there&amp;#39;s some commitment from Microsoft to be more open source friendly, but since this will never happen, they can keep their HW.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48353544&quot; title=&quot;„Built on Windows”. That’s like anti-ad these days. Maybe, maybe worth looking at if you can run other OS than Windows on it, but that will probably take some time.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48362087&quot; title=&quot;The biggest problem here is the operating system. If they could fix that, this might be enticing.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Former insiders note that these issues often stem from subpar third-party components and firmware that even dedicated engineering teams struggled to overcome &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361697&quot; title=&quot;I worked with some of the people responsible for the Surface Book, Surface docks, and specifically the Surface Book&amp;#39;s dock. These were hardware people (EEs), not software people, and this was after their time at MS. Unfortunately I don&amp;#39;t remember specifics (both because it&amp;#39;s been a few years, and because I&amp;#39;d probably have to fuzz details anyway), but... : Docks are horrifying products. Thunderbolt docks are doubly horrifying. They ordered in every single competing dock they could find, from…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/stanford-cs336/assignment1-basics/blob/main/CLAUDE.md&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI Agent Guidelines for CS336 at Stanford&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359232&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;375 points · 124 comments · by prakashqwerty&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stanford University&amp;#39;s CS336 course guidelines instruct AI agents to act as teaching assistants by providing conceptual guidance and debugging support without writing code or generating direct solutions for students. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/stanford-cs336/assignment1-basics/blob/main/CLAUDE.md&quot; title=&quot;Title: assignment1-basics/CLAUDE.md at main · stanford-cs336/assignment1-basics    URL Source: https://github.com/stanford-cs336/assignment1-basics/blob/main/CLAUDE.md    Markdown Content:  ## AI Agent Guidelines for CS336 at Stanford    [](https://github.com/stanford-cs336/assignment1-basics/blob/main/CLAUDE.md#ai-agent-guidelines-for-cs336-at-stanford)  This file provides instructions for AI coding assistants (like ChatGPT, Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, etc.) working with students in…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Educators are increasingly integrating AI guidelines into curricula, viewing them as essential teaching tools despite the risk of students using them to bypass learning &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359602&quot; title=&quot;This seems somewhat sensible to me - the genie _is_ out of the bottle, and students absolutely will use AI agents to finish assignments without learning a thing, but there is some value to showing how agents can be used as teaching tools and what healthy use _can_ look like&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48360832&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m trying something similar this semester with my course via AGENTS.md. I think this one is overly verbose and probably falls out of context windows pretty quickly, based on my experience (for me, a very terse but clear set of 30 lines performed better than providing examples and more nuanced explanations during my testing with a few models). I have included the basic &amp;#39;I am a student -- help me learn, don&amp;#39;t just do everything for me,&amp;#39; but I also am trying out telling it to generate a .history…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest technical enforcement like requiring prompt history logs or specific file configurations, others argue that guidelines are easily bypassed and that academic integrity ultimately relies on high-stakes, in-person testing or a strong honor code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48360832&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m trying something similar this semester with my course via AGENTS.md. I think this one is overly verbose and probably falls out of context windows pretty quickly, based on my experience (for me, a very terse but clear set of 30 lines performed better than providing examples and more nuanced explanations during my testing with a few models). I have included the basic &amp;#39;I am a student -- help me learn, don&amp;#39;t just do everything for me,&amp;#39; but I also am trying out telling it to generate a .history…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48360309&quot; title=&quot;Same issue as with cliffnotes. Easy way out means the easy way will be taken. Unless, you actually design a decent assignment or exam. In person essays or exams, heavily weighted, you are simply screwed if you didn&amp;#39;t study the old fashioned way. A couple of my more serious classes were like this: no homework, no projects, entire grade based on 3 exams. That put the fear of whatever diety you subscribe to into you like nothing else to study hard and not fall behind. One bad exam you can&amp;#39;t really…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359731&quot; title=&quot;This is interesting. I don&amp;#39;t know how the AI agent guidelines will be enforced because there will always be a model outside the curriculum that a student can use to bypass the guidelines. Encouraging academic integrity is useful but requires the student to buy into the idea that they are paying for an education, not a diploma. This is a tough problem and I have been wondering how CS departments are incorporating AI into the curriculum while encouraging appropriate use in a learning environment.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48362106&quot; title=&quot;As a general rule with LLMs, don&amp;#39;t just tell it to do something if you actually need to make sure it gets done. Use a hook script to make it do that, or use the history that&amp;#39;s already there (transcripts of all sessions are retained in ~/.claude, for example). There are innumerable scripts out there to parse these, or your agent will whip one up for you in 5 minutes.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48360046&quot; title=&quot;Stanford has an honour code. Meant no oversight even during exams. Worked surprisingly well when I was there. The flipside is, if you’re ever caught cheating, there are no second chances. I imagine this applies here, too, if they want to enforce it strictly.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite skepticism about enforcement, some observe a growing social &amp;#34;flex&amp;#34; among students who value actual knowledge over AI-generated shortcuts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359577&quot; title=&quot;good intention but useless let&amp;#39;s be real&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359776&quot; title=&quot;Seeing my own kids (teens) go through some of this, I&amp;#39;m becoming slightly less pessimistic as it all shakes out. Among their peer groups there does seem to be an opinion forming that sure, anyone can just ask ChatGPT for quick answers on assignments, but actually knowing stuff is a bit of a &amp;#39;flex&amp;#39; that&amp;#39;s respected.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cs336.stanford.edu/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;CS336: Language Modeling from Scratch&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cs336.stanford.edu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48357075&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;421 points · 45 comments · by kristianpaul&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stanford’s CS336 course teaches students to build language models from scratch, covering data collection, transformer architecture, systems optimization, scaling laws, and reinforcement learning through intensive, implementation-heavy assignments. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cs336.stanford.edu/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Stanford CS336 | Language Modeling from Scratch    URL Source: https://cs336.stanford.edu/    Published Time: Mon, 01 Jun 2026 18:02:47 GMT    Markdown Content:  ## Content    ### What is this course about?    Language models serve as the cornerstone of modern natural language processing (NLP) applications and open up a new paradigm of having a single general purpose system address a range of downstream tasks. As the field of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and NLP continues to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stanford&amp;#39;s CS336 course offers a rigorous &amp;#34;from-scratch&amp;#34; approach to language modeling, with recent updates focusing on distributed training, scaling laws, and RL-based alignment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48360931&quot; title=&quot;I recently completed the 2025 version of this course (video + most assignments, skipping some of the most costly part of the tasks). That&amp;#39;s quite something. There is a lot going on in the first two assignments which required a ton of thinking and debugging. Despite having a decent foundation in deep learning, it took me several months to finish it using bits of my after-work hours and weekends. (I am not a model part-time student by any means, and sometimes I didn&amp;#39;t get to work on this for…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48360261&quot; title=&quot;TA here. Biggest changes are in the second assignment (distributed) where we added a bunch of memory, profiling and distributed tasks, as well as in the fifth assignment (alignment), where most of the RL tasks are fresh this year. Assignment 3 (scaling laws) was also completely updated, but in a way that might be difficult to run without substantial resources. I&amp;#39;m working on a way for external students to be able to run simulated experiments for free! Assignment 1 (basics) has the most hours of…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While the course suggests high-end hardware like B200 GPUs, participants and TAs clarify that most development can be done on consumer hardware like a 4090, 5080, or even a Mac M1 for early sections &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48358733&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; GPU compute for self-study Those suggestions they make for a B200 start at $4.99 an hour. Is that really required, for starting out?  I&amp;#39;ve been tinkering with my own from-scratch LLM, but in the early phases I don&amp;#39;t need anything more than a 4090 on Vast.ai&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361477&quot; title=&quot;Can anyone answer question - whats the minimum viable GPU to follow along with this course at home? I have a 5080 16GB, are they really needing more than that in this course?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361601&quot; title=&quot;The first section can be done on a M1 chip, I think the second one needs Triton support, so your 5080 should be fine.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361507&quot; title=&quot;TA here. Noted! I now have more resources to test more environments, and will do so whenever possible. I think freezing due to memory overuse is going to be a problem with anything you code yourself, but I do think we could be more rigorous with guiding people to achieve limited memory use for the tokenizer task. IMO the cost of renting GPUs is a bit overstated in these comments. Generally almost all of the development can be done locally, and then ran for a short period of time using on-demand…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Students should expect a significant time commitment and potential environment setup challenges on non-Linux systems, though the total cost for renting cloud GPUs can be kept under $50 with careful scaling &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48360931&quot; title=&quot;I recently completed the 2025 version of this course (video + most assignments, skipping some of the most costly part of the tasks). That&amp;#39;s quite something. There is a lot going on in the first two assignments which required a ton of thinking and debugging. Despite having a decent foundation in deep learning, it took me several months to finish it using bits of my after-work hours and weekends. (I am not a model part-time student by any means, and sometimes I didn&amp;#39;t get to work on this for…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361507&quot; title=&quot;TA here. Noted! I now have more resources to test more environments, and will do so whenever possible. I think freezing due to memory overuse is going to be a problem with anything you code yourself, but I do think we could be more rigorous with guiding people to achieve limited memory use for the tokenizer task. IMO the cost of renting GPUs is a bit overstated in these comments. Generally almost all of the development can be done locally, and then ran for a short period of time using on-demand…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/01/duckduckgo-makes-its-no-ai-search-engine-easier-to-access-as-its-traffic-booms/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;DuckDuckGo makes its &amp;#39;no-AI&amp;#39; search engine easier to access as its traffic booms&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techcrunch.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359130&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;293 points · 143 comments · by jaredwiener&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DuckDuckGo has launched new browser extensions for Chrome and Firefox that allow users to set its AI-free search page as their default, capitalizing on a surge in traffic from users seeking alternatives to Google’s AI-heavy search results. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/01/duckduckgo-makes-its-no-ai-search-engine-easier-to-access-as-its-traffic-booms/&quot; title=&quot;Title: DuckDuckGo makes its ‘no-AI’ search engine easier to access as its traffic booms    URL Source: https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/01/duckduckgo-makes-its-no-ai-search-engine-easier-to-access-as-its-traffic-booms/    Published Time: 2026-06-01T14:49:10+00:00    Markdown Content:  As its traffic continues to climb, alternative search engine [DuckDuckGo](https://duckduckgo.com/) is leaning into anti-AI sentiment with the launch of new browser extensions that allow users to set its no-AI search…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide between users who view AI integration as a costly, unwanted feature and those who find it useful when offered with granular control &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359360&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Wait, we&amp;#39;re getting an influx of new users, and they actively don&amp;#39;t want us to run the most expensive part of our search results page?&amp;#39; Where can I find such accommodating customers myself?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359373&quot; title=&quot;Pretty much everywhere. AI is only popular with AI providers and delusional C-suites.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359442&quot; title=&quot;I started to find that the AI bit was the most useful part of Google Search.  But the actual search results were terrible and now I use Kagi.  I like being able to add a question mark and control what becomes AI and what doesn&amp;#39;t.  I use normal search like a Ctrl F for the internet and don&amp;#39;t want it to be too clever.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that AI popularity is driven primarily by corporate executives and &amp;#34;fanboy&amp;#34; engineers seeking career survival, others point to massive user bases as evidence of genuine demand &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359373&quot; title=&quot;Pretty much everywhere. AI is only popular with AI providers and delusional C-suites.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359416&quot; title=&quot;chatgpt alone had like ~900 million weekly active users last i checked. thats a lot of c-suites (or the anti-ai crowd is more vocal than the occasional chatgpt user)&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359578&quot; title=&quot;I think that a lot of those overly enthusiastic engineer AI fanboys are just playing a rational game driven by their perception that AI is a effective substitute for them, and that the only way to survive the comming culling is by being seen on the market as something an AI thought leader. Basically, signalling that they are going to be cooperative subjects for the enemy&amp;#39;s occupation of the land. &amp;#39;I, for one, welcome our new giant insect overlords&amp;#39; is, IMHO, the operative meme here. Others are…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, many users prefer a &amp;#34;no-AI&amp;#34; search experience because they view traditional search as a precise tool and would rather visit dedicated chat interfaces for generative responses &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359442&quot; title=&quot;I started to find that the AI bit was the most useful part of Google Search.  But the actual search results were terrible and now I use Kagi.  I like being able to add a question mark and control what becomes AI and what doesn&amp;#39;t.  I use normal search like a Ctrl F for the internet and don&amp;#39;t want it to be too clever.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359370&quot; title=&quot;To be honest, I didn&amp;#39;t find DuckDuckGo&amp;#39;s AI on the top of their search to be very good anyway compared to the one Google has. However can&amp;#39;t say I have cared much as typically if I am searching I don&amp;#39;t want an AI response, otherwise I&amp;#39;d just go straight to an AI chat interface in the first place.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48357725&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ask HN: Who is hiring? (June 2026)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48357725&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;176 points · &lt;strong&gt;256 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by whoishiring&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hacker News has opened its monthly &amp;#34;Who is hiring?&amp;#34; thread for June 2026, allowing companies to post active job openings for remote and onsite positions directly to the community. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48357725&quot; title=&quot;Please state the location and include REMOTE for remote work, REMOTE (US)  or similar if the country is restricted, and ONSITE when remote work is &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;not&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; an option.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Please only post if you personally are part of the hiring company—no  recruiting firms or job boards. One post per company. If it isn&amp;amp;#x27;t a household name,  explain what your company does.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Please only post if you are actively filling a position and are committed  to replying to applicants.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Commenters: please don&amp;amp;#x27;t…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The June 2026 hiring thread is marked by significant frustration over a surge in fraudulent applications, including scammers using stolen identities and fake resumes to impersonate established developers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361314&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve decided to no longer post here after the incredible amount of spam I started receiving, both in terms of direct email submissions as well as unqualified and outright fraudulent applications to my application tracking system. By fraudulent I mean: fake resumes, names stolen from real developers who work at well-known companies but either don&amp;#39;t have a linkedin/portfolio or do have a linkedin/portfolio without a profile picture. So easily impersonated by a scammer. It is a real shame, but…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Candidates express reciprocal exhaustion with &amp;#34;onerous&amp;#34; application processes and multi-stage interviews that often result in ghosting or canceled roles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48360756&quot; title=&quot;This is an extremely onerous application process, probably the most so that I&amp;#39;ve ever seen. While I&amp;#39;m interested in the role, I won&amp;#39;t be doing all of that during phase zero before any human has indicated interest in my skills. Just some feedback.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48363290&quot; title=&quot;It happens to candidates! Let&amp;#39;s not forget what we have to go through, 6 or 7-stage interview processes, that requires a lot of preparation, as if we don&amp;#39;t deserve the time to have a life too. Fake jobs, scammers, dodgy &amp;#39;take-home tests&amp;#39; containing malicious packages, cancelled interviews on the day, cancellation of the role in the middle of the hiring process, change of hiring plans, requests to record videos before talking to someone, ghosting, interviewers not interested in interviewing,…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these frictions, specialized roles remain available in AI-assisted writing, fire department operations, and open-source compiler tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48357929&quot; title=&quot;Sudowrite | https://sudowrite.com | √ REMOTE (US) | √ PMF | √ PROFITABLE | Full-Time Kind, smart, low-drama people, seeking the same to help make writing tools authors dream about. Our users have published thousands of books using Sudowrite, and we&amp;#39;re building a sustainable company, not chasing unrealistic growth targets set by VCs. * We help the next generation of storytellers tell better stories. * We believe the future of writing is AI &amp;amp; human collaboration. * Co-founders both had prior…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48358328&quot; title=&quot;Hotwash | Founding Engineer (→ CTO for the right person) | REMOTE (US), Boston a plus | Full-time I&amp;#39;m a solo founder. I built the entire product myself, got 11 fire departments paying with zero churn, and now I need someone to own engineering so I can&amp;#39;t be the only one who does. West Point, Ranger Regiment, Yale Law, still the only developer. What we do: Hotwash is an after-action review platform for fire departments. After a serious call, crews record what happened, we transcribe and structure…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48357732&quot; title=&quot;Adacore | Software Engineers | Full-time | Remote or On-Site Adacore is the maintainer of GNAT, GCC&amp;#39;s Ada frontend (but now with many more compiler backends: LLVM, Why3, JVM...) and of a lot of tools revolving around the Ada ecosystem (IDEs, Coverage tools, Fuzzers, Static Analyzers, Formal proof tooling...). Evertything we build is open-source and we make money by providing support, trainings, certifications... We are looking for different profiles: - GCC/GNU toolchain developpers (…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/01/openai-hit-with-florida-lawsuit-00944215&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Florida sues OpenAI and Sam Altman over AI risks&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (politico.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48358667&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;201 points · 166 comments · by cyunker&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Florida’s attorney general has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman, alleging the company prioritized profits over public safety and failed to adequately mitigate the risks associated with its artificial intelligence technology. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/01/openai-hit-with-florida-lawsuit-00944215&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.wsj.com&amp;amp;#x2F;tech&amp;amp;#x2F;ai&amp;amp;#x2F;openai-sued-by-floridas-attorney-general-over-ai-harms-8a5113a8?st=Gcpn84&amp;amp;amp;reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.wsj.com&amp;amp;#x2F;tech&amp;amp;#x2F;ai&amp;amp;#x2F;openai-sued-by-floridas-attorney...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.nbcnews.com&amp;amp;#x2F;tech&amp;amp;#x2F;tech-news&amp;amp;#x2F;florida-sues-openai-sam-altman-saying-put-profit-safety-rcna347602&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely view the lawsuit as a &amp;#34;crackpot&amp;#34; or populist political maneuver rather than a viable legal case, noting the extreme difficulty of proving OpenAI liable for providing general information that users might misuse &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48362167&quot; title=&quot;Claims in the lawsuit seem sketchy, and I don&amp;#39;t think they will win. It is probably not true that ChatGPT has resulted in an increase in murders and suicides, and certainly it would be very difficult to prove liability on OpenAI for this. It reminds me of the campaign in the 90s against video game manufacturers for &amp;#39;corrupting the youth&amp;#39;. But I also don&amp;#39;t think they expect to win. They just want to show that they&amp;#39;re doing something to fight tech companies and AI.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48362418&quot; title=&quot;This take seems particularly crackpot. If gun manufacturers can&amp;#39;t be sued for product liability when used to fire bullets into people, it&amp;#39;s rich to say that the manufacturer of a chatbot can be found liable when it mindlessly says &amp;#39;Good point&amp;#39; to people who already have serious mental health problems. If so, would this program also open me up to liability in Florida? const platitudes = [&amp;#39;Good point!&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;You&amp;#39;re absolutely right.&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;I agree, let&amp;#39;s explore this idea further.&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;This plan is a good…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48362345&quot; title=&quot;Full transcripts are unfortunately not available for any of those cases, but from what I&amp;#39;ve found it provided general information about e.g. how to load and operate a firearm or how past mass shootings have been received in the media. The way I see it, providing general information is not a crime. They&amp;#39;re basically saying: &amp;#39;Oh no! My repository of all human knowledge contains all human knowledge! It must be defective!&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that AI products are defective if they facilitate planning self-harm or attacks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48362247&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; certainly it would be very difficult to prove liability on OpenAI for this My understanding is that OpenAI products specifically provided help in planning attacks / self harm.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others compare the situation to gun manufacturing, debating whether a tool&amp;#39;s primary purpose should dictate its legal liability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48362418&quot; title=&quot;This take seems particularly crackpot. If gun manufacturers can&amp;#39;t be sued for product liability when used to fire bullets into people, it&amp;#39;s rich to say that the manufacturer of a chatbot can be found liable when it mindlessly says &amp;#39;Good point&amp;#39; to people who already have serious mental health problems. If so, would this program also open me up to liability in Florida? const platitudes = [&amp;#39;Good point!&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;You&amp;#39;re absolutely right.&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;I agree, let&amp;#39;s explore this idea further.&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;This plan is a good…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48362589&quot; title=&quot;The purpose of a gun is to kill things, whereas the purpose of a chat bot is to help people. They&amp;#39;re not really in the same category of tool.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48362604&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; purpose of a gun is to kill things I’ve fired guns. Never to kill things. I’ve also used chat bots to be entirely useless. I wouldn’t endorse this dichotomy of purpose as a basis for any judgement.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. A broader political analysis suggests the suit reflects Florida&amp;#39;s shift toward an anti-tech, populist stance aimed at retirees, contrasting it with Texas’s focus on becoming an R&amp;amp;D and data center hub &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361977&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s interesting how Texas and Florida are both &amp;#39;red&amp;#39; states but have pivoted into really different political paths under the same flag. Texas is leaning into becoming the manufacturing and R&amp;amp;D hub for the US, and is courting gigascale data centers and rolling out nuclear power, near-infinite solar, wind, and gas to power it as fast as possible. Florida is leaning into the retired and populist factions of the GOP, banning data centers and taking on populist anti-tech positions that Texas…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48362089&quot; title=&quot;Texas is becoming a hub for educated professionals and Florida is a hub for non-college retirees&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, some users suspect the underlying goal is to force tech companies to report private user conversations to authorities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48363225&quot; title=&quot;At the end of the article, the main guy says he wants tech companies to report your conversations to the authorities if bad content is detected. That’s their goal, apparently&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kde.org/anniversaries/30/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;KDE at 30&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (kde.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48357355&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;234 points · 115 comments · by Kye&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KDE is celebrating its 30th anniversary, marking three decades of developing open-source software, including the Plasma desktop and the KHTML engine that influenced modern web browsers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kde.org/anniversaries/30/&quot; title=&quot;KDE at 30    KDE is turning 30 this year! Three decades of passionate community effort against all odds; delivering control, privacy, and freedom to our users; and tons and tons of software.    [Skip to content](#main)[Home](https://kde.org/)    * [Products](https://kde.org/products/)  * [Develop](https://develop.kde.org)  * [KDE for You](https://kde.org/for/)  * [Help](https://kde.org/support/)  * [Get Involved](https://community.kde.org/Get_Involved)  * [❤️ Donate](https://kde.org/donate/)    * Select…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KDE is celebrated for its longevity and balance of power-user customization with a familiar, Windows-like interface that remains performant on older hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48358603&quot; title=&quot;One of the most impressive and useful free software projects. My first experience was being totally confused by KDE 1 during my first attempts to use Linux, and I&amp;#39;m writing this from my KDE desktop. Other than the really bad KDE 4 release, the project has consistently been great for me. I&amp;#39;ve submitted a few smaller patches over the years and that experience was also low friction for a project of this size. KDE is highly customizable, full of power user features but also really simple with its…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359236&quot; title=&quot;I have long held a bias of KDE being the clunky and slow option from trial in the ~early-oughts. Within the past month or so I installed it to give it a spin and haven&amp;#39;t switched back to XFCE since. It strikes a good balance of customization / speed / taste / and just working out of the box. Thanks KDE team!&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359906&quot; title=&quot;If you are someone that mostly likes the Windows 7/10 experience, KDE out of the box is basically that.  It&amp;#39;s more customizable.  It&amp;#39;s (IMO) less clunky and less burdened by legacy components.  But it really just feels like windows used to feel like. But also just fast and low memory.  You can run KDE on ancient hardware.  If you have something like 512MB of ram, you can do KDE just fine.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48358449&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s impressive for the project to have come so far. Between the oversimplified, hyper-opinionated GNOME, the rock-solid but dull and minimal XFCE, the nostalgic MATE, and whatever Enlightenment is doing these days, it’s nice to have a continually polished, modern, well-integrated yet customisable experience like KDE, even today. And save for Akonadi (which just never seems to work reliably, rendering software like KMail useless), it’s been a pretty stable one for me, too. Here’s to another 30…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users miss the ambitious object-oriented integration of the 2000s, others appreciate that the desktop has matured into a stable, &amp;#34;boring&amp;#34; environment that avoids the oversimplification seen in competitors like GNOME &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359312&quot; title=&quot;It feels to me that a lot of the bigger ideas in KDE fell away over the years. In the 2000s I would log in every morning, open a KWord doc in one Konqueror tab, a KSpread sheet in another, and some browser tabs alongside them, then I&amp;#39;d launch Kate and open some files over SSH or FTP and get to work. It felt like someone had really embraced OO and applied it to every part of the desktop, and I assume something like KParts and KIOSlaves still exist. But for the most part, I use KDE now as a bog…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48358449&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s impressive for the project to have come so far. Between the oversimplified, hyper-opinionated GNOME, the rock-solid but dull and minimal XFCE, the nostalgic MATE, and whatever Enlightenment is doing these days, it’s nice to have a continually polished, modern, well-integrated yet customisable experience like KDE, even today. And save for Akonadi (which just never seems to work reliably, rendering software like KMail useless), it’s been a pretty stable one for me, too. Here’s to another 30…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. However, the introduction of a non-binary mascot sparked debate, with one critic lamenting the perceived shift toward political messaging while others defended the change as a practical design choice &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48358055&quot; title=&quot;I lament the times when open source projects were open source software projects instead of political platforms for people who arrogantly think that their private political opinion is important enough to overshadow the project they participate in. This will undoubtedly create tensions and will lead to fewer donations, thus having a negative impact on KDE.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48358121&quot; title=&quot;With all due respect: it is just a picture of a cute lizard. Thinking practically, having a male and female lizard is sort of inconvenient for a mascot, since leaving one out is a message in itself. Having a genderless mascot with art assets ready to go makes practical sense to me.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://30fps.net/pages/255-vs-256-division/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Should you normalize RGB values by 255 or 256?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (30fps.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48360054&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;230 points · 97 comments · by pplanu&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While normalizing RGB values by 255 is the standard for GPU compatibility and mapping black to 0.0, dividing by 256 offers slightly better theoretical precision and uniform bin sizes; however, the 255 method remains recommended for general image processing to ensure consistency with existing data. &lt;a href=&quot;https://30fps.net/pages/255-vs-256-division/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Should you normalize RGB values by 255 or 256?    URL Source: https://30fps.net/pages/255-vs-256-division/    Markdown Content:  Let’s say you’re writing an image processing program. The program takes in an image, converts it to floating point, does some processing and finally saves the modified pixels to disk as 8-bit colors. The question today concerns how exactly the integer-to-float conversion should be done. There are two approaches which, written in Python and NumPy, look like this:    |…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate centers on whether to normalize by the maximum value (255) to represent a full range from zero to one, or by the number of possible states (256) to leverage faster bit-shift operations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361082&quot; title=&quot;If you have a ruler and it goes to 12 inches, you should normalize by the length L and not by 13, the number of points on the ruler.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361247&quot; title=&quot;yes but &amp;gt;&amp;gt; 8 is so much faster&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48362006&quot; title=&quot;The difference between 20 cycles and 1 clock cycle in a hot loop is very noticeable&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that using 255 is mathematically correct for mapping &amp;#34;bin edges&amp;#34; and that performance differences are often negligible due to modern CPU speeds and memory bandwidth bottlenecks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361910&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s just multiplication. Floating multiply is extraordinarily fast.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48362843&quot; title=&quot;The author is confusing bins with bin edges. In their first plot, the standard approach looks strange because 0-7 should be the bin edges, not the center points as shown in the plot. You can see this confusion again in the histogram example. There are only 255 bins, not 256. If you fix that mistake and remove the 0.5 offset, then the histogram is distributed correctly at both ends.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361624&quot; title=&quot;Only in micro-benchmarks. For real usage, today&amp;#39;s CPUs are limited by memory bandwidth.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Others suggest a +0.5 offset or alternative ranges like 16-235, noting that &amp;#34;absolute zero&amp;#34; is rarely necessary for SDR luminances and that hardware-specific voltage constraints can make these discrepancies visible as color tints &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361173&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ll argue for the +0.5 solution. First, I don&amp;#39;t like half-sized intervals at the edges, and second, a 255-based representation is typically a SDR (not HDR) image. RGB values represent luminances against some adapted state, and a &amp;#39;zero&amp;#39; in a daylit scene is not &amp;#39;zero luminance&amp;#39; - it&amp;#39;s just about 0.001x as bright as the brightest point - it&amp;#39;s millions of photons, way more than zero. In a sense our eyes experience contrast on a sliding scale, and there is no absolute zero in the system. For…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48363726&quot; title=&quot;This problem of what exactly a color value means is mostly inconsequential when you have 8 bits per component, the difference in the denominator being either 255 or 256 makes the errors tiny, you must have really good color perception and get really close to the screen to see any difference at all, and your monitor/phone screen is probably not calibrated  anyway, so who cares. It becomes a pain in the ass when you&amp;#39;re generating a VGA signal with a microcontroller with 8 color output pins (3…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48363321&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; broadcast systems historically used 16-235 For 8-bit, 16 maps to 7.5IRE which is the well understood legal black. Mapping 235 means they mapped peak to 110IRE. This is based on a 0-120IRE scale. This gets weird as the broadcast limit for video was 100IRE allowing for the chroma to reach 110IRE. So if you&amp;#39;re trying to limit your white values to 235, that&amp;#39;ll be higher than is broadcast safe. Of course, nobody cares about NTSC broadcast limits any more. However, to this day, I still see out of…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://eblog.fly.dev/githubbad.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GitHub and the crime against software&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (eblog.fly.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361064&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;208 points · 103 comments · by pplanu&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article criticizes GitHub’s declining reliability and performance, arguing that Microsoft prioritizes bloated AI features over fundamental infrastructure. Through technical analysis, the author demonstrates that GitHub’s front-end is significantly more resource-heavy and slower than competitors like Codeberg, signaling systemic decay within the platform&amp;#39;s software architecture. &lt;a href=&quot;https://eblog.fly.dev/githubbad.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: githubbad.html    URL Source: https://eblog.fly.dev/githubbad.html    Markdown Content:  ## [github and the crime against software](https://eblog.fly.dev/githubbad.html#github-and-the-crime-against-software)  A software article by Efron Licht     May 2026    ### [[**ALL ARTICLES**](https://eblog.fly.dev/index.html)](https://eblog.fly.dev/githubbad.html#all-articles-index-html)### [[**LICENSE**](https://eblog.fly.dev/license.html)](https://eblog.fly.dev/githubbad.html#license-license-html)###…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While users can easily mirror Git repositories across multiple providers like GitLab or Codeberg to avoid single points of failure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361590&quot; title=&quot;Because of so many GitHub problems, I&amp;#39;m adding GitLab.com and Codeberg.org. Setup is simply 3 steps: 1. Sign up on each service, ideally with the same username. 2. For each repo you want to share, create the same repo name as a blank repo; do not automatically create a README. 3. Edit your local file .git/config to add push URLs, then push as usual. Example: [remote &amp;#39;origin&amp;#39;]          url = git@github.com:foo/bar.git          pushurl = git@codeberg.org:foo/bar.git          pushurl =…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, the primary lock-in remains the &amp;#34;institutional knowledge&amp;#34; and metadata—such as issues, pull requests, and project boards—that are difficult to migrate cleanly &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361820&quot; title=&quot;Where do you keep Issues, Pull Requests, Wikis, Discussions, project boards, and everything else? (rhetorical question.) These days, the problem with cloud-hosted Git platforms is not where to push your code. Replicating repositories across multiple providers is relatively easy, and Git has always been good at that. The harder problem is that successful teams end up accumulating a lot more than source code around their repositories, and much of that information becomes just as important as the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Some developers advocate for using specialized, decoupled tools like YouTrack or Gerrit to maintain flexibility, though others argue this merely increases the number of potential failure points &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48362097&quot; title=&quot;(I upvoted you, for asking the real questions, but to answer) &amp;gt; Where do you keep Issues, Youtrack &amp;gt; Pull Requests, Gerrit, it&amp;#39;s way better for code review &amp;gt; Wikis, Also Youtrack, but other software exists that&amp;#39;s specific for this, I have seen Confluence used a lot and while I don&amp;#39;t recommend: that&amp;#39;s usually the case. &amp;gt; Discussions, As far away from code as possible, right now it&amp;#39;s Zulip &amp;gt; project boards, Youtrack, though usually in companies they use Jira for this. &amp;gt; and everything else?…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond technical hurdles, GitHub’s dominance is reinforced by &amp;#34;star&amp;#34; counts acting as a form of social currency for project importance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48362012&quot; title=&quot;Nginx was compelled to move to GitHub [1]. The fact that companies request you to star them on GitHub and the stars can be bought tells you that there is a value in these stars. [2] Now, some astute reader, who thinks the $1 trillion global advertisement market does not influence them, will also claim that they don&amp;#39;t care about GitHub stars. Well, that&amp;#39;s not how the world works. Fake stars can propel a good project to great. A lot of people will use GitHub stars as a currency to decide the…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, leading some to lament that ease of use and corporate freemium models have triumphed over independent hacker culture &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361746&quot; title=&quot;What happened to hacker culture? Did everyone (or enough) just sell out? It’s fascinating to me that the people who know the most about tech keep deciding over and over to give something to some corporation and inevitably it becomes an issue. I guess ease of use and freemium really trumps everything; I expect more from smart people but money talks.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48361786&quot; title=&quot;Nobody wants to pay for git hosting. Seems like nobody wants to self-host it either.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openai.com/index/openai-frontier-models-and-codex-are-now-available-on-aws/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OpenAI frontier models and Codex are now available on AWS&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (openai.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48363132&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;213 points · 73 comments · by typpo&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI has made its frontier models and Codex generally available on AWS, allowing enterprise customers to integrate advanced AI capabilities into production using their existing security, compliance, and governance workflows. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openai.com/index/openai-frontier-models-and-codex-are-now-available-on-aws/&quot; title=&quot;Title: OpenAI frontier models and Codex are now available on AWS    URL Source: https://openai.com/index/openai-frontier-models-and-codex-are-now-available-on-aws/    Markdown Content:  OpenAI frontier models and Codex are now available on AWS | OpenAI    Helping enterprises bring AI into production through their existing security, governance, and deployment workflows.    Today, OpenAI frontier models and Codex are generally available on AWS, opening a new path for millions of AWS customers to build…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Large enterprises prioritize AWS Bedrock for OpenAI models primarily because it bypasses the difficult process of approving new vendors and ensures data remains within existing legal and security frameworks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48364126&quot; title=&quot;If you&amp;#39;ve used AI coding models in a large corporate setting, you&amp;#39;ll know that a lot of big corporate deployments basically require using AWS Bedrock for two simple reasons: 1. Large companies tend to already have an existing relationship with AWS, which makes things way easier to go through vs. setting up a new vendor relationship  2. Large companies tend to have strong internal requirements about making sure that internal data stays under company control. With AWS Bedrock, you can be a lot…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48364581&quot; title=&quot;Every time somebody questions why you might &amp;#39;trust&amp;#39; AWS (or Azure or GCP or whatever), or why you&amp;#39;d pay this premium, I realize they are not accustomed to working in enterprise environments. In my case, I work at a large enterprise with strict data governance built into customer contracts, and (partly related, partly not) our own governance concerns. Using vendors where you not only have infosec permission, but they are also listed as data processors in our contracts with our customers is the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48364096&quot; title=&quot;If you are wondering why anyone would spend more money to use these APIs through AWS instead of going direct: In some companies it’s nearly impossible to get new vendors approved. If the company has an AWS contract then you have to use what AWS offers.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users question the absolute trustworthiness of Amazon given past data misuse in its retail division, others argue that AWS&amp;#39;s reputation and strict contractual obligations as a data processor provide necessary protection against data being used for model training &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48364145&quot; title=&quot;How is one certain bedrock data isn’t being shuttled to external providers?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48364581&quot; title=&quot;Every time somebody questions why you might &amp;#39;trust&amp;#39; AWS (or Azure or GCP or whatever), or why you&amp;#39;d pay this premium, I realize they are not accustomed to working in enterprise environments. In my case, I work at a large enterprise with strict data governance built into customer contracts, and (partly related, partly not) our own governance concerns. Using vendors where you not only have infosec permission, but they are also listed as data processors in our contracts with our customers is the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48364411&quot; title=&quot;To take an easy example that has actually had lawsuits I can link to, you must be unfamiliar with the lawsuits against Amazon for misusing sellers&amp;#39; data in order to undercut them with their own products... https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/13-bln-uk-lawsuit-acc... There&amp;#39;s zero reason to &amp;#39;trust&amp;#39; Amazon about anything. (And yes, I know the retail and AWS sides of the company are different, but it&amp;#39;s still the same company. The same rot is always there, just shuffled around.)&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48364161&quot; title=&quot;Contracts and the force of law?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite higher costs compared to direct API access, the integration is seen as a requirement for corporate compliance and data governance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48364126&quot; title=&quot;If you&amp;#39;ve used AI coding models in a large corporate setting, you&amp;#39;ll know that a lot of big corporate deployments basically require using AWS Bedrock for two simple reasons: 1. Large companies tend to already have an existing relationship with AWS, which makes things way easier to go through vs. setting up a new vendor relationship  2. Large companies tend to have strong internal requirements about making sure that internal data stays under company control. With AWS Bedrock, you can be a lot…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48363892&quot; title=&quot;More expensive than directly sourcing from OpenAI&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-dirt-that-refused-to-die-20260601/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What appear to be biochemical processes may be a natural feature of geology&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (quantamagazine.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48357905&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;212 points · 72 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Researchers have discovered that sterile soil can emit carbon dioxide for over six years, suggesting that metabolic processes like the Krebs cycle can occur through geological catalysts rather than living organisms, potentially predating the origin of life on Earth. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-dirt-that-refused-to-die-20260601/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Dirt That Refused To Die | Quanta Magazine    URL Source: https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-dirt-that-refused-to-die-20260601/    Published Time: 2026-06-01T14:44:57+00:00    Markdown Content:  For 15 years, Sébastien Fontaine has been trying to kill dirt. The biochemist, who runs a lab at the French National Institute for Agriculture, Food, and Environment, wanted to know how much carbon is released by soil — just dirt alone, completely devoid of life. His team sealed dirt into jars and…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discovery that geological processes can mimic biochemistry reinforces the theory that Earth acts as a massive &amp;#34;chemical computer,&amp;#34; where life emerged as a search accelerator for stable energy gradients &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48362828&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s been speculated for at least a decade now that geochemistry spawned biochemistry and life as we know it. This appears to be the latest instance of this pattern. One of the most notable examples is geothermal processes simply creating calm energy gradients that are stable for billions of years (e.g., underwater alkaline vents), which can then essentially &amp;#39;manufacture&amp;#39; organic compounds, which naturally assemble into more complex compounds like magnetic Lego blocks, which ... I like to think…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While simple amino acids are found throughout the solar system, researchers note that biological life is distinguished by its use of complex amino acids and specific &amp;#34;left-handed&amp;#34; chirality, whereas abiotic processes produce racemic mixtures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359546&quot; title=&quot;Not as much as you might think. We&amp;#39;ve found amino acids almost everywhere we look, including astroids [1]. It seems that the building blocks of life pretty naturally and readily form.  Which is a pretty strong indicator that life is likely fairly common outside earth. [1] https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasas-asteroid-bennu-sampl...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359986&quot; title=&quot;The amino acids that can be found everywhere include ten of the simpler amino-acids that are used in proteins (glycine, the 2 acids, the 3 branched, alanine, proline and the 2 alcohols). The other 11 amino-acids from proteins have never been found where life does not exist. They are more complex and they seem to have been developed by living beings long after the appearance of life and the appearance of the genetic code (they seem to have substituted later the simpler amino-acids in certain…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48360792&quot; title=&quot;I agree. It seems that the choice between left-handed and right-handed amino-acids was random. However, it is unlikely that other kinds of life forms could use both kinds indiscriminately, because mixing them creates difficulties in the assembling of polymers. So it is likely that amino-acids produced by some extra-terrestrial life form would also be predominantly of only one orientation, but it could happen to be the right-handed variant. Moreover, extra-terrestrial life forms could use very…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. This distinction is critical for space exploration, as geological processes could otherwise produce false positives for metabolic activity in Martian soil &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359330&quot; title=&quot;This is huge news if true for evaluating soil experiments on Mars. They could give false positives for life if they only look for metabolic products.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some argue that despite Earth&amp;#39;s ongoing &amp;#34;unfathomable computations,&amp;#34; no new form of life has emerged in the three billion years since the original ancestor established its specific cellular and genetic framework &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48363619&quot; title=&quot;Yet, there is only one form of life on earth exhibiting cellular metabolism and DNA/RNA replication. That original life form formed as soon as the earth became suitable for life. In the 3+ billion years since, there has been no new life form created that we know of despite the ongoing unfathomable computations.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://debug.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Debug Project&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (debug.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48362347&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;188 points · 78 comments · by Eridanus2&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Debug Project is developing technology to raise and release sterile male mosquitoes carrying *Wolbachia* bacteria to suppress wild populations and prevent the spread of diseases like dengue and Zika. &lt;a href=&quot;https://debug.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Debug Project    URL Source: https://debug.com/    Published Time: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 17:08:00 GMT    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/9zZ3_wijp6Sdrgqp3IN5-7wb0CJ-rL4jJIWEtQ2KoHc1bOSy2Wq3vurk8l61O2hO-OlHspIEJlIYpMyHHl2y5T_uLI_lwYgOeFjd)    ![Image 2](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/0szrhcCqRFjSu2DpqdfqzZ4vMvtSMYpLcJogrrIjLMBB6_wQN9l9MDoF4hyQ9ZmMTTCn-79FvLj7VddisvoLo5XTJQhgBeulpgqk9x0)    ## ![Image 3: Let&amp;#39;s stop bad bugs with good…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion is split between nostalgia for the compact DOS `debug.com` utility and a debate over the ecological risks of the &amp;#34;Debug Project&amp;#34; mosquito initiative. While some users suggest WinDbg as a modern equivalent to the DOS tool, others argue it lacks the same integrated assembly and patching capabilities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48362927&quot; title=&quot;The domain name reminds me of the venerable DOS &amp;#39;debug.com&amp;#39; command, which managed to combine an interactive and scriptable debugger, assembler, and disassembler into a program weighing a few kilobytes. I spent many long hours in my youth using it to reverse engineering copy protection on games. I really wish we had a similar tool for the modern era.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48363349&quot; title=&quot;WinDbg?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48363489&quot; title=&quot;WinDbg is just a debugger: it does not assemble or disassemble. It can&amp;#39;t patch running programs in memory. Moreover, I don&amp;#39;t consider Windows to be part of the modern era, as I haven&amp;#39;t used a Windows machine for 20 years. So, no, WinDbg has nothing to do with debug.com.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Regarding the mosquito project, commenters express significant concern over unforeseen side effects on the food chain and environment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48363030&quot; title=&quot;No thanks. I’m very concerned some short term thinking behind a plan to alter the biology of our environment will have various side effects no one anticipated. It has happened many, many times before. Same with geo engineering in general - hard to trust the incentives, competency, and long term side effects.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48364221&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand non-breedable part, mosquitoes are a part of a food chain as everything else, surely you don&amp;#39;t think eliminating them will have no consequences?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48362849&quot; title=&quot;Is this safe? I hope it doesn&amp;#39;t affect the ecology in worse ways we won&amp;#39;t foresee, it has happened before&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, though proponents note that the target species is non-native and has been successfully managed using similar methods in Singapore &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48362930&quot; title=&quot;This is a great initiative. HOWEVER, THIS IS NOT NEW. This has already been tried and tested successfully in Singapore. https://www.nea.gov.sg/corporate-functions/resources/researc...&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48363373&quot; title=&quot;The species is not native. Surely we can agree that eradicating non-native species  is a good thing?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/may/31/meta-legal-action-forces-facebook-whistleblower-to-stay-silent-at-hay-festival&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Legal action forces Facebook whistleblower to sit in silence at Hay festival&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theguardian.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48353965&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;200 points · 52 comments · by beardyw&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Facebook whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams sat in silence during a Hay Festival panel after Meta’s legal threats of heavy fines and sanctions prevented her from speaking or even gesturing. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/may/31/meta-legal-action-forces-facebook-whistleblower-to-stay-silent-at-hay-festival&quot; title=&quot;Meta legal action forces Facebook whistleblower to sit in silence at Hay festival    Sarah Wynn-Williams did not speak during event after lawyers warned of possible sanctions from tech firm    [Skip to main content](#maincontent)[Skip to navigation](#navigation)    Close dialogue1/2Next imagePrevious imageToggle caption    [Print…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While initial discussion suggested the whistleblower was merely following standard legal advice &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48354256&quot; title=&quot;Note that she was following her lawyers advice. Not a gag order from Meta. This advice l is standard practice when you have an active litigation against you (everything you say can and will be used against you). Edit: I stand corrected. See comment below.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, it was clarified that Meta secured an emergency court order threatening $50,000 fines for each breach &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48354323&quot; title=&quot;There is apparently a court order involved: &amp;#39;Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, secured an emergency legal order on the eve of publication preventing her from publicly discussing aspects of the book, and she faces fines of $50,000 (£37,000) each time she breaches the order.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters expressed frustration with a legal system that allows NDAs to suppress information &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48354495&quot; title=&quot;I find it wild that a &amp;#39;justice&amp;#39; system allows something like this to happen. It&amp;#39;s absolute joke.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48354640&quot; title=&quot;One who understands the power of nondisclosure agreements. You might find it surprising that an executive signed a long-lasting non-disparagement agreement, but obviously they wouldn&amp;#39;t have got the job otherwise. These are a very real problem. Especially the use of NDAs to cover up gross misconduct. (a particularly egregious example: Neil Gaiman!)&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt; and criticized Mark Zuckerberg’s perceived vindictiveness and hypocrisy regarding free expression &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48354461&quot; title=&quot;You can always tell that Zuck continues to maintain and assert his ultimate control over Meta, because only a vindictive child acts like this.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48354561&quot; title=&quot;What kind of a very sad human being must one be when you have almost all the money in the world and continue to do very stupid things with it. In my experience the people who scream and threaten the loudest kinda acknowledge the problems.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48354169&quot; title=&quot;As Mark Zuckerberg has said in 2017 : &amp;#39;I&amp;#39;m here today because I believe that we must continue to stand for free expression,&amp;#39; he said. &amp;#39;You should be able to say things that other people don&amp;#39;t like, but you shouldn&amp;#39;t be able to say things that put people in danger.&amp;#39; https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/nation/facebook-ceo-promote...&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Some noted that such legal maneuvers are common when powerful entities use expensive litigation to enforce non-disparagement agreements &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48354640&quot; title=&quot;One who understands the power of nondisclosure agreements. You might find it surprising that an executive signed a long-lasting non-disparagement agreement, but obviously they wouldn&amp;#39;t have got the job otherwise. These are a very real problem. Especially the use of NDAs to cover up gross misconduct. (a particularly egregious example: Neil Gaiman!)&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48355368&quot; title=&quot;This is so sad to see. It makes me lose respect for the legal system when the people with the most expensive lawyers automatically win. Luckily I&amp;#39;m not in the US but even here meta gets away with a lot (especially because they have the Irish privacy regulator in their pocket)&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-31</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-31</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hacktivis.me/articles/cloudflare-turnstile-webgl-fingerprinting&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cloudflare Turnstile requiring fingerprintable WebGL&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (hacktivis.me)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48345840&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;603 points · 332 comments · by HypnoticOcelot&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudflare Turnstile now requires WebGL device fingerprinting to verify users, effectively blocking WebKitGTK browsers and privacy-focused configurations that restrict data collection for tracking purposes. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hacktivis.me/articles/cloudflare-turnstile-webgl-fingerprinting&quot; title=&quot;Title: Cloudflare Turnstile requiring fingerprintable WebGL    URL Source: https://hacktivis.me/articles/cloudflare-turnstile-webgl-fingerprinting    Published Time: Sun, 31 May 2026 00:34:51 GMT    Markdown Content:  Since about a week, Cloudflare Turnstile (their &amp;#39;Verify you&amp;#39;re human&amp;#39; device verification) has been looping indefinitely in my [webkit-gtk based browser](https://hacktivis.me/projects/badwolf). Preventing access to quite few websites…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudflare’s Turnstile is criticized for using invasive fingerprinting techniques, such as WebGL and JA3, which compromise user privacy and block privacy-conscious browsers like Cromite &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346154&quot; title=&quot;Cloudflare is known to use fingerprinting to detect scrapers For example, they use JA3 fingerprints and match them against the UA to block stuff like cURL while allowing OkHttp (Android clients) - but this can be easily be spoofed with packages such as CycleTLS [1]. I don&amp;#39;t want to defend them, because they gate away a good chunk of the internet with their &amp;#39;bot protection&amp;#39;, but unless you do PoW (which is also ecologically a nightmare), probably fingerprinting is the way to go - completely…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue these measures are necessary to prevent &amp;#34;legalized DDoS&amp;#34; attacks from AI bots &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348552&quot; title=&quot;The problem is what is the alternative? I&amp;#39;m (not) defending them or this practice by any measure, but we all know what happens if you just open your site up without these, especially with AI bots which hammer servers and are in effect a legalized DDoS system. I&amp;#39;ve hated CAPTCHAs ever since I first encountered them and I can&amp;#39;t wait for them to just finally die a permanent death, but I also don&amp;#39;t know how we solve the &amp;#39;how do you identify a human and a bot&amp;#39; in a way which doesn&amp;#39;t require server…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346152&quot; title=&quot;...in the age of AI, does anyone have an actual solution for keeping out bots while preserving the privacy of humans? Obviously this is terrible, but I think there&amp;#39;s a possibility it&amp;#39;s the least terrible option? Another option is IP reputation, which I think is worse. Or scanning a code with a non-rooted phone, which I think is even worse than that!&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that modern servers can easily handle the extra load and that website owners are losing legitimate users to over-aggressive protection &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347174&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I don&amp;#39;t want to defend them, because they gate away a good chunk of the internet with their &amp;#39;bot protection&amp;#39; They also gate away a good many people with their &amp;#39;bot protection&amp;#39;. I am extremely worried about how so many seem to have outsourced the control over who can access their websites to a company, with no second thoughts whatsoever.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348668&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; we all know what happens if you just open your site up without these, especially with AI bots which hammer servers and are in effect a legalized DDoS system No, we don&amp;#39;t know. I honestly do not understand the problem. I run websites, both static and non-static. Granted, my sites aren&amp;#39;t exactly the most popular internet go-to destinations, but I should be seeing this DDoS too, right? I do see lots of requests. Nothing that any modern system can&amp;#39;t handle. Computers are stupid fast these days.…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347928&quot; title=&quot;I can no longer access any website that&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;protected&amp;#39; by Cloudflare. As soon a website enables that stuff… &amp;#39;Shoot, another one bites the dust.&amp;#39; I wonder if the website owners realise at all how many actual users they lose by this sort of &amp;#39;protection.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Suggested alternatives to fingerprinting include Proof-of-Work (PoW) systems like Anubis or Private Captcha, though concerns remain regarding their ecological impact &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346154&quot; title=&quot;Cloudflare is known to use fingerprinting to detect scrapers For example, they use JA3 fingerprints and match them against the UA to block stuff like cURL while allowing OkHttp (Android clients) - but this can be easily be spoofed with packages such as CycleTLS [1]. I don&amp;#39;t want to defend them, because they gate away a good chunk of the internet with their &amp;#39;bot protection&amp;#39;, but unless you do PoW (which is also ecologically a nightmare), probably fingerprinting is the way to go - completely…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346474&quot; title=&quot;Use proof-of-work captchas, many are private by default. Look into Private Captcha or Cap captcha.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346480&quot; title=&quot;The tool &amp;#39;Anubis&amp;#39; uses proof of work instead&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/RsyncProject/rsync/issues/929&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Please Do Not Vibe Fuck Up This Software&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48342705&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;479 points · 433 comments · by justdotJS&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A heated GitHub issue on the Rsync project sparked a debate over &amp;#34;vibe coding,&amp;#34; with users criticizing the use of AI in developing the stable utility after recent regressions. While some defended the maintainers&amp;#39; modernization efforts, others argued that AI-generated &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; threatens the reliability of critical infrastructure. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/RsyncProject/rsync/issues/929&quot; title=&quot;Title: Please Do Not Vibe Fuck Up This Software    URL Source: https://github.com/RsyncProject/rsync/issues/929    Published Time: 2026-05-30T12:34:23.000Z    Markdown Content:  # Please Do Not Vibe Fuck Up This Software · Issue #929 · RsyncProject/rsync    [Skip to content](https://github.com/RsyncProject/rsync/issues/929#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [](https://github.com/)    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The integration of AI-assisted code into `rsync` has sparked a heated debate over whether &amp;#34;rock solid&amp;#34; infrastructure tools should ever experiment with such technologies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48343887&quot; title=&quot;I truly don&amp;#39;t get it You have a rock solid piece of software used by an infinite amount of people and other services. It works fine, does it&amp;#39;s job and just have some time to time updates due to minor bug fixes. Why do we need AI here? And more over, why people is saying &amp;#39;fork it and use the previous version&amp;#39;. It should be actually all the way around, create a parallel fork younamethetool-ai and keep the OG untouched. What I have to do now, keep a fork of my entire system&amp;#39;s toolkit?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48343004&quot; title=&quot;I find the way that issue was opened incredible obnoxious, but it is baffling that the maintainers seem to have let AI loose on rsync. Like, why? Why try comparatively experimental crap when your fortune and reputation is made and you&amp;#39;re the leader of a niche and immune to market pressure and the people love the thing and it does exactly what it&amp;#39;s supposed to and works well? It&amp;#39;s like the Matrix, with the little rant about the primitive human minds not being able to accept paradise. You wrote…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that the high stakes of data integrity make AI-generated &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; an unacceptable risk, noting a massive spike in code changes—roughly 26,000 lines in two months—that threatens the tool&amp;#39;s legendary stability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48345202&quot; title=&quot;This is rsync we are talking about. A bug in rsync basically means lost data and/or unreliable backups. I think it&amp;#39;s normal to be pissed at lost data. Maybe it&amp;#39;s not socially acceptable to spit in the face of a volunteer but it&amp;#39;s 100% human to feel annoyed by an obvious drop in code quality.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48342822&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; 26k code changes in 2 months..... rsync was 67k LOC as of 236417c (latest not obviously vibecoded commit it seems?).[1] Wow. 1: https://github.com/RsyncProject/rsync/issues/929#issuecommen...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, some defenders label the backlash as &amp;#34;anti-AI derangement,&amp;#34; arguing that the community&amp;#39;s aggressive brigading of volunteer maintainers is irrational and lacks concrete evidence of increased regressions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48344322&quot; title=&quot;This whole brigading is bizzarre and some people are behaving like irrational animals. I potentially understand the motivations that might bring one to want to &amp;#39;win&amp;#39; this battle but this really isn&amp;#39;t it - it just makes you sound like a fanatic. It takes 5 minutes to search for &amp;#39;regression&amp;#39; on the issue page and go through the 17 results. There are potentially even more on the tracker used prior to github. I think this behavior is very silly and people are just trying to justify their hate to AI…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48344568&quot; title=&quot;Similar to anti-AI derangement&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48345080&quot; title=&quot;Spamming an open source developer with angry comments because they decided to use a new tool for the code they write and publish freely is not normal.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://simpleflying.com/united-airlines-767-returns-newark-bluetooth-name-alert/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (simpleflying.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48345248&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;321 points · &lt;strong&gt;572 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by Eridanus2&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A United Airlines flight from Newark to Spain returned to the airport after a passenger&amp;#39;s Bluetooth device was discovered with the name &amp;#34;BOMB,&amp;#34; triggering a security alert and a police investigation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://simpleflying.com/united-airlines-767-returns-newark-bluetooth-name-alert/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Four-Letter Word&amp;#39;: United Airlines 767 Returns To Newark After Bluetooth Name Sparks Alert    The flight crew issued repeated warnings and a one-minute ultimatum to passengers, demanding they turn off their Bluetooth devices.    Menu    [![Simple Flying logo](https://static0.simpleflyingimages.com/assets/images/sf-logo-full-colored-light.svg?v=3.6 &amp;#39;Simple Flying&amp;#39;)](/)    Sign in now    [ ]    Close    * + [AIRLINES](https://simpleflying.com/category/airlines/)    +…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The incident has sparked a debate between those who view the airline&amp;#39;s response as a necessary adherence to safety protocols and those who see it as &amp;#34;insane&amp;#34; risk aversion and security theater &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348695&quot; title=&quot;I once consulted on some aviation-related software (not the safety work prominent on my resume), and a company announcement came through, that you must never use a few specific words commonly heard in software development.  The two no-no words I recall were &amp;#39;crash&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;bomb&amp;#39;.  Don&amp;#39;t write them in code or documents, don&amp;#39;t say them on the phone or videoconf, etc. Those terms have senses that people in aviation take extremely seriously, for extremely good reasons.  A miscommunication can trigger…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348790&quot; title=&quot;This is trying to sanewash totally insane levels of risk aversion. Do you think terrorists are really going to name their Bluetooth speaker &amp;#39;bomb&amp;#39;? Do you think this behaviour has any meaningful true positives? This is the kind of brainworms thinking that has people throwing our their 150ml liquids out at TSA and taking their shoes off.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48349015&quot; title=&quot;1. Are super-organized, highly-capable, fully-sane terrorists the only threat?  Or does the threat model include mentally-ill / personality disorder people, who might make mistakes, or taunt those whose job it is to stop them?  Or include people of either kind, who create diversions?  Or include people who make a statement in an unexpected way? 2. Did the captain, flight control, and everyone else who needed to decide, have definitive information that the report was only an innocuous Bluetooth…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents of the response argue that personnel must take all potential threats seriously to avoid life-critical errors, noting that threats can come from mentally ill individuals or as diversions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348695&quot; title=&quot;I once consulted on some aviation-related software (not the safety work prominent on my resume), and a company announcement came through, that you must never use a few specific words commonly heard in software development.  The two no-no words I recall were &amp;#39;crash&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;bomb&amp;#39;.  Don&amp;#39;t write them in code or documents, don&amp;#39;t say them on the phone or videoconf, etc. Those terms have senses that people in aviation take extremely seriously, for extremely good reasons.  A miscommunication can trigger…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48349015&quot; title=&quot;1. Are super-organized, highly-capable, fully-sane terrorists the only threat?  Or does the threat model include mentally-ill / personality disorder people, who might make mistakes, or taunt those whose job it is to stop them?  Or include people of either kind, who create diversions?  Or include people who make a statement in an unexpected way? 2. Did the captain, flight control, and everyone else who needed to decide, have definitive information that the report was only an innocuous Bluetooth…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, critics argue that such extreme precautions are counterproductive, noting that the friction caused by excessive security can indirectly lead to more deaths by pushing travelers toward more dangerous modes of transport like driving &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348790&quot; title=&quot;This is trying to sanewash totally insane levels of risk aversion. Do you think terrorists are really going to name their Bluetooth speaker &amp;#39;bomb&amp;#39;? Do you think this behaviour has any meaningful true positives? This is the kind of brainworms thinking that has people throwing our their 150ml liquids out at TSA and taking their shoes off.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350515&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This is trying to sanewash totally insane levels of risk aversion. To add more credence to your point, let&amp;#39;s not forget this beautiful line in TFA | During this incident, a Wi-Fi hotspot named &amp;#39;Free Palestine, F Zionists&amp;#39; prompted the pilot to issue a warning to the cabin, telling the passenger responsible that they had &amp;#39;30 seconds&amp;#39; to remove the name or the FBI would meet the aircraft. This is clearly not a threat. I&amp;#39;m not trying to make a political statement and not going to say what side…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, commenters questioned the logic of the crew&amp;#39;s demands, such as asking a potential bomber to turn off their device or threatening FBI involvement over political Wi-Fi names that do not constitute credible threats &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350515&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This is trying to sanewash totally insane levels of risk aversion. To add more credence to your point, let&amp;#39;s not forget this beautiful line in TFA | During this incident, a Wi-Fi hotspot named &amp;#39;Free Palestine, F Zionists&amp;#39; prompted the pilot to issue a warning to the cabin, telling the passenger responsible that they had &amp;#39;30 seconds&amp;#39; to remove the name or the FBI would meet the aircraft. This is clearly not a threat. I&amp;#39;m not trying to make a political statement and not going to say what side…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48345566&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; a flight attendant told passengers over the PA system that they &amp;#39;must turn off Bluetooth immediately,&amp;#39; or else the aircraft would have to turn around. So if the person just takes back their bomb threat everything is ok? Or did they think the terrorist labeled their Bluetooth bomb “bomb” and this would disable it?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48349239&quot; title=&quot;Landing the plane because of something that could be interpreted as a bomb threat without waiting to be sure it was intended that way seems like a precaution on the far end of reasonable, but still reasonable. Demanding that people disable Bluetooth does not seem reasonable. If there&amp;#39;s an actual bomber, tipping them off that you&amp;#39;re reacting to their threat might lead them to set off the bomb early. Similarly, demanding that someone shut off the &amp;#39;Free Palestine, F Zionists&amp;#39; WiFi network or the…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://thesciverse.org/scientists-found-that-the-creatine-supplement-millions-take-for-muscle-gains-is-quietly-raising-brain-energy-levels-and-slowing-early-alzheimers-cognitive-decline-by-30/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Creatine raises brain energy levels and slows cognitive decline: study&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (thesciverse.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346947&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;512 points · 335 comments · by MrJagil&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Recent clinical trials and reviews indicate that creatine supplementation raises brain energy levels and can slow cognitive decline in early Alzheimer’s patients by 30% while also improving memory, processing speed, and depression symptoms in healthy adults. &lt;a href=&quot;https://thesciverse.org/scientists-found-that-the-creatine-supplement-millions-take-for-muscle-gains-is-quietly-raising-brain-energy-levels-and-slowing-early-alzheimers-cognitive-decline-by-30/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Scientists found that the creatine supplement millions take for muscle gains is quietly raising brain energy levels and slowing early Alzheimer’s cognitive decline by 30%    URL Source: https://thesciverse.org/scientists-found-that-the-creatine-supplement-millions-take-for-muscle-gains-is-quietly-raising-brain-energy-levels-and-slowing-early-alzheimers-cognitive-decline-by-30/    Published Time: 2026-05-31T10:50:04+00:00    Markdown Content:  Tens of millions of people take creatine every day.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users find the pilot study&amp;#39;s p-values promising for cognitive improvement, critics point out that the research lacked a placebo group and relied on a very small sample size &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347625&quot; title=&quot;The article made up the claim it’s not from the paper itself. There was some improvement in cognitive scores, but no placebo group. Without a placebo group, there are a lot of explanations for the data.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347740&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;  Recently, a pilot study (single-arm) by Smith et al., recruited 20 patients (73 years of age) with AD and provided them with 20 grams/day of CrM for 8 weeks [20]. Serum creatine levels were increased at weeks 4 and 8 (p &amp;lt; 0.001), and total brain creatine levels (as measured by H-MRS) increased by 11% (p &amp;lt; 0.001). Clinically, there were demonstrated improvements in cognition on global (p = 0.02) and fluid composites (p = 0.004), as well as List Sorting (p = 0.001), Oral Reading (p &amp;lt; 0.001)…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion regarding safety is divided: some warn that high dosages (20-25g/day) could strain the kidneys, while others argue this is a medical misconception based on how creatine affects standard lab tests &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347449&quot; title=&quot;Direct link to the study: https://jpbs.hapres.com/htmls/JPBS_1766_Detail.html I wanted to check the dosages they used. Looks like the review includes studies ranging from 5g/day to 20-25g/day. (Typical dosage you&amp;#39;ll see for daily use is 5 grams)&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347627&quot; title=&quot;Just in case anyone is thinking about trying it: 25g seems pretty high. It’s worth it to review what that means for the rest of your body before starting this regime. Kidneys are really useful organs to have working.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347735&quot; title=&quot;This is a myth, its not bad for your kidneys. The reason this gets spread is because you will have higher levels of creatine in your urine if your Doctor tests your urine for kidney function, which indicates kidney disease. However, If you reveal to that doctor that you&amp;#39;re supplementing Creatine it will not be concern them.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Anecdotal reports include personal success with the supplement&amp;#39;s physical and mental effects, though some users expressed concerns about potential hair loss and the possibility of astroturfed praise &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347696&quot; title=&quot;Curious if anyone has had hair issues while taking it. I’m aware that there’s no positive evidence for an effect, but there is an at least plausible mechanism. I’ve gone through two periods where I took it and liked the effects, but felt like I shed way more hair and stopped due to that.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347437&quot; title=&quot;Creatine is one of the few supplements I actually notice a difference if I quit taking. Happy to see it’s benefits extend to beyond performance in the gym.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347509&quot; title=&quot;Feels like a sign of the times that I expect half the comments here to be paid astroturfing about how amazing creatine is.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347778&quot; title=&quot;Do you work out? If so creatine is supposed to help people push themselves harder and thus build more muscle. As a side-effect of intense exercises you&amp;#39;ll create more testosterone. Increased testosterone leads to balding.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/i/status/2060746160558543217&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Codex just found a &amp;quot;workaround&amp;quot; of not having sudo on my PC&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348578&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;479 points · 223 comments · by thunderbong&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The provided link is inaccessible because JavaScript is disabled or a technical error occurred on the X (formerly Twitter) platform, preventing the retrieval of the story&amp;#39;s content. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/i/status/2060746160558543217&quot; title=&quot;# JavaScript is not available.    We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using x.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.    [Help Center](https://help.x.com/using-x/x-supported-browsers)    [Terms of Service](https://x.com/tos)  [Privacy Policy](https://x.com/privacy)  [Cookie Policy](https://support.x.com/articles/20170514)  [Imprint](https://legal.twitter.com/imprint.html)  [Ads…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights that using the &amp;#34;docker&amp;#34; group to bypass sudo is a well-known security risk equivalent to having root access, a &amp;#34;feature&amp;#34; often used for host configuration &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348780&quot; title=&quot;Every time I try to install Docker there&amp;#39;s a warning that being in the &amp;#39;docker&amp;#39; group is equivalent to having root access. You should probably know about this workaround by now.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348812&quot; title=&quot;This has been a known Docker &amp;#39;feature&amp;#39; since the beginning, nothing new here. This pattern is used to configure host machines by some tools.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348700&quot; title=&quot;This is a classic attack path that was already captured by plenty of EDRs/XDRs/CWPPs a couple years ago.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that users cannot be expected to master the security nuances of every tool they install &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48349656&quot; title=&quot;Most of us install Docker just to run a project locally, and is part of a long checklist of things to install. We can&amp;#39;t expect everyone to be an expert on the hundreds of apps/tools/packages that get installed on a machine. It&amp;#39;s like expected people to read, and understand, all the terms of service shoved in front of us on a daily basis.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others note that Docker explicitly warns about this during post-installation steps &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350100&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s why adding your user account to the docker group is a separate step that explicitly does not happen as part of the installation: https://docs.docker.com/engine/install/linux-postinstall/ &amp;gt; Warning &amp;gt; The docker group grants root-level privileges to the user. For details on how this impacts security in your system, see Docker Daemon Attack Surface.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; and suggest that using `sudo` for individual commands or switching to Podman are safer alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350698&quot; title=&quot;wait so just being lazy and using sudo on Docker commands instead of figuring things out actually means I&amp;#39;m being safer? awesome.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348972&quot; title=&quot;This is one of the main reasons people like Podman. Docker has this &amp;#39;feature&amp;#39; but as far as I remember, it needed some obscure configuration. I guess they don&amp;#39;t add it as default as it will break many current setups.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond Docker itself, there is concern regarding AI agents autonomously exploiting these vulnerabilities, leading some users to recommend isolating sensitive data on separate machines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48349380&quot; title=&quot;I realize this is supposed to be a post about how scary the security vulnerabilities these agents will find are. But personally I love when agents do things like this and appreciate the help.  Last thing in the world I want is for them to nerf the models.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348961&quot; title=&quot;This was of course dependent on yolo mode, but automatic approval has also been pulling stunts like this. A recent example is data that was purposely kept away from Codex in a folder far far away. When it found a single reference it just went for the data when having an issue. Lesson learned, keep essential data and Codex separated on different machines. Codex remote ssh actually helps here.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://specification.website/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Website Specification&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (specification.website)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48343683&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;470 points · 191 comments · by k1m&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Website Specification is a platform-agnostic guide outlining essential technical standards for web development, covering ten categories including accessibility, security, and AI readiness to help developers audit and improve site quality. &lt;a href=&quot;https://specification.website/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Website Specification    URL Source: https://specification.website/    Markdown Content:  ## What a good website does.    A platform-agnostic specification of the technical features every decent website should have — from `&amp;lt;title&amp;gt;` to `/.well-known/security.txt`, from WCAG contrast to `llms.txt`. Written for humans and agents.    ## Categories    Ten areas, mapped to widely-accepted standards.    [All topics →](https://specification.website/spec/)    *   ### [Foundations 14 The HTML, head, and…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on a critique of modern web bloat, with many users expressing nostalgia for the simplicity of early HTML while others point out that the 2000s were actually defined by &amp;#34;abused&amp;#34; table layouts and difficult browser polyfills &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48344281&quot; title=&quot;I swear to God. I just want to go back to the 2000s where everything was just plain HTML and some basic CSS, if at all any, by default you got responsive design out of the box, readable text and super user friendly GUI from the browser&amp;#39;s own default stylesheet. Today you open any website. Everything is a fucking component. A simple dropdown with a finite list? Has its own loader and makes 10 fetch requests for no reason. Not even exaggerating - look at Instagram and Facebook on web. Fuck all…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48344754&quot; title=&quot;In the 2000s wasn&amp;#39;t everything just misused/abused table layouts? Maybe we frequented different places, but that&amp;#39;s how I remember it.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48344872&quot; title=&quot;Responsive design out of the box? Were you actually there? Back in 2000 you could make a career out of scripting browser polyfills or &amp;#39;DHTML&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346425&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s funny because the argument against tables was always that they added extra markup a.k.a lines of code, only to replace them with dozens of nested divs, half assed CSS layout ideologies (floats and clear&amp;#39;s, for example) and barely functional JS that all somehow needed to work in sync which was almost never. That&amp;#39;s how NPM was born. Tables worked with 100% of the browsers. The alternatives needed polyfills and shims and ironically the whole thing needed easily 2x the number of integration…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant skepticism regarding &amp;#34;Agent Readiness&amp;#34; specifications, which some view as &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; that could be exploited by bad actors to serve mismatched content to AI versus humans &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48343826&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Agent Readiness&amp;#39; will likely age as well as &amp;#39;Web 4.0 Blockchain Integration&amp;#39; has. (To be entirely clear, not because agents won&amp;#39;t be a relevant thing, although certainly I have my doubts, but because I believe even if they are a relevant thing, requiring special allowances from sites undermines the whole point, and such things will only end up used by bad actors to mismatch what agents see to what humans see, and so will be intentionally ignored.)&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48343827&quot; title=&quot;This looks like slop from a slop factory. &amp;#39;SEO&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;Agent-readiness&amp;#39;. That&amp;#39;s precisely what a good website doesn&amp;#39;t do (to paraphrase the homepage). Oh yes, it&amp;#39;s produced by a Wordpress &amp;#39;SEO&amp;#39; expert and private investor using Claude LLM. What a surprise. A man who built a fortune destroying the internet we loved with advertisement slop now working on destroying whatever&amp;#39;s left with LLM slop.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Instead of new standards, commenters advocate for better adherence to existing best practices, such as semantic markup to improve &amp;#34;Reader Mode&amp;#34; and standardized form behaviors for password managers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48344236&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d love best practices around, say, login forms, e.g.: - use standard input field names password managers recognize  - disable autocompletion and autocapitalization on the login field - if it&amp;#39;s an email, use the correct HTML5 input type - don&amp;#39;t have a form with just a login email and force the user to click to enter the password - follow NIST SP 800-53, e.g. no SMS 2FA and no arbitrary password rotation and composition rules Or how many sites that have a form with only one input don&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48343998&quot; title=&quot;This is what reader mode is. It exists purely because most websites are unreadable.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48344028&quot; title=&quot;Big fan of reader mode. For me, a direction better than llms.txt would be to encourage sites to improve their markup (think semantic web era) so agents could get the text version from that the way reader mode does. Would achieve the same thing - save tokens. This isn&amp;#39;t difficult and I think the reason it hasn&amp;#39;t been done is that publishers want clicks and ad views. Which begs the question: why would they start doing it for agents?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jbkempf.com/blog/2026/dav2d/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Dav2d&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jbkempf.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48344961&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;431 points · 162 comments · by captain_bender&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VideoLAN has announced dav2d, an open-source software decoder for the new AV2 video codec designed to provide high-performance, portable decoding on existing hardware while the ecosystem matures. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jbkempf.com/blog/2026/dav2d/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Let dav2d be — Jean-Baptiste Kempf    URL Source: https://jbkempf.com/blog/2026/dav2d/    Markdown Content:  ## dav2d    _A codec does not really exist until everyone can decode it._    Today, we announce [dav2d](https://code.videolan.org/videolan/dav2d), a fast decoder for the new [AV2](https://jbkempf.com/tags/av2/) codec, developed by members of the [VideoLAN](https://www.videolan.org/) community.    A few weeks ago, we opened the repository and started development in public. Since then, AV2…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the extreme computational demands of AV2, which is estimated to be five times more complex to decode than AV1 despite offering only a 25% efficiency improvement &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48345267&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;AV2 decoding is roughly five times more complex than AV1 decoding. In practice, that means software running on today’s hardware will struggle to decode AV2 in real time without careful, architecture-specific optimization&amp;#39; AV1 software decoding is already very intensive so AV2 decoding benchmarks are the next thing that would be really interesting (or mortifying) to see.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48345261&quot; title=&quot;... improvements around 25% compared to AV1      AV2 decoding is roughly five times more complex than AV1 decoding I&amp;#39;m not sure what these two lines mean or if we can compare them, any help?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users questioned the choice of C and Assembly over Rust, the project lead argued that such high complexity necessitates low-level optimization for maximum performance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48345281&quot; title=&quot;Sorry if this sounds naive, but does it make sense to write a codec library in C/ASM considering how well Rust is progressing, especially when, as the author puts it, AV2 decoding is roughly five times more complex than AV1 decoding ?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48345338&quot; title=&quot;Because it&amp;#39;s 5 times more complex, you need to get the maximum performance available. Therefore more ASM than ever. Rust does not bring more performance. Just more safety.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Participants also expressed concerns regarding future hardware support for real-time decoding and the ongoing legal challenges surrounding &amp;#34;royalty-free&amp;#34; patent claims in the AV1/AV2 ecosystem &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48345959&quot; title=&quot;Intel&amp;#39;s Arc dGPUs were really compelling for dedicated AV1 encode and decode, especially the small form factor of some cards. You could even fit it as a secondary card in a PC dedicated to recording and encode workflows for OBS. Hope we get a similar option with future lineups that support AV2, especially given how popular video creation and streaming are now.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48345237&quot; title=&quot;How is AV2 expected to avoid the patent-pool issues AV1 ran into? AV1 was designed as royalty-free, but Sisvel’s pool and the recent Dolby/Snap proved the contrary. https://accessadvance.com/2026/03/24/access-advance-licensor...&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://thoughts.hmmz.org/2026-05-31.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The solution might be cancelling my AI subscription&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (thoughts.hmmz.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48345896&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;349 points · 225 comments · by dmw_ng&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that AI subscriptions should be canceled because the technology acts as a &amp;#34;distraction amplifier,&amp;#34; encouraging the creation of low-quality, unmaintainable projects while eroding the deep focus and friction necessary for meaningful, high-quality work. &lt;a href=&quot;https://thoughts.hmmz.org/2026-05-31.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: the solution might be cancelling my AI subscription    URL Source: https://thoughts.hmmz.org/2026-05-31.html    Markdown Content:  * * *    I am trying to think of a list of all the wonderful things I&amp;#39;ve built with AI:    *   a speech recognition system in rust   *   an email archive rendering + quote collapsing tool   *   a jellyfin desktop clone with gstreamer and qt quick   *   an invidious clone in python + yt-dlp   *   a faithful Windows 95 notepad.exe clone in fltk ported from the Wine sources…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether AI-driven &amp;#34;vibecoding&amp;#34; devalues the act of creation by prioritizing the end product over the process of learning and play &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346515&quot; title=&quot;Wow. To me the point of code has always been the crazy ideas and playing around. I love to create just for me and every once in a while for others is ok too. If you only think of code as &amp;#39;a tool to build useful things&amp;#39; and everything else as wasted then sure, this is the philosophy for you. However, creating a bunch of random not going to follow up on it but I explored and played moments seems like a plus and not a negative to me.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346736&quot; title=&quot;OP paid a machine to have those moments instead of him.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347006&quot; title=&quot;I think the bifurcation is between people who want to write code and people who want to have the end product of the code. People who want to write code hate AI because it&amp;#39;s doing the part they wanted to do. People who want the end product of the code love AI because they want anything that helps them get to the end product faster. The person who wrote this post feels oddly in neither camp. They like playing with the AI and seeing what comes out the other end. Some of the projects they boast…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that AI merely replaces older shortcuts like StackOverflow or compilers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346776&quot; title=&quot;As opposed to the old days when people would just blindly copy/paste random shit from Stackoverflow? Ya&amp;#39;ll need to stop with this cope. It&amp;#39;s not a good look.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346817&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m sure they were blindly accepting the Assembly coming out of the compiler.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that it encourages a &amp;#34;pure waste&amp;#34; of time by producing throwaway projects that offer neither income nor the educational value of manual coding &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346863&quot; title=&quot;I wonder how many of the responses here bifurcate by age. The post resonates with me, but I am now in my early fifties. When I was in my 20&amp;#39;s and 30&amp;#39;s, I would have happily chased rabbits down all those holes, but now that time seems so brutally finite, I feel that anything encouring me to spend time on stuff other than what really matters is a strong negative. (Where &amp;#39;what matters&amp;#39; includes work, family, friends, and recreation). When friends start dying within 10 years of your age, it&amp;#39;s a…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346341&quot; title=&quot;In the old days, producing all those things would be tremendous learning opportunity. Today it&amp;#39;s a pure waste, not producing income is not a problem, not producing anything is.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. This tension reveals a divide between those who view coding as a hobbyist craft and those who see it as a means to an end, with some critics questioning the &amp;#34;capitalist&amp;#34; dismissal of projects that don&amp;#39;t have a marketing plan &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346318&quot; title=&quot;It seems like the author is overindexing on useful and underindexing on wonderful. He clearly had fun building these products — and in hindsight is disavowing them because they didn’t generate income? An oddly capitalist view of play. Some really good points on how these bots are incentivized to reward mindless engagement though and the bit about voice transcription not producing useful writing landed. When the barrier to release drops the quality naturally does too. I think the next stage of…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346513&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; In recent times, at least once per month someone sends a screenshot for an awesome tool they are working on. I&amp;#39;m like whoa, that&amp;#39;s really something and the sender is obviously proud and enthusiastic. I try not to ask, but am always thinking &amp;#39;and where will you market it?&amp;#39; What a strange perspective. His dismissal of the long list of projects at the top is also odd. What&amp;#39;s wrong with making something cool and functional (if not &amp;#39;useful&amp;#39;), even if just for yourself, without any profit motive or…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/27/meta-officially-launches-instagram-facebook-and-whatsapp-subscriptions-with-more-to-come-including-ai-plans/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Meta launches Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp subscriptions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techcrunch.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347354&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;186 points · &lt;strong&gt;280 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by tambourine_man&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meta has launched global paid subscription plans for Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp, offering premium features like profile customization and advanced analytics while testing new &amp;#34;Meta One&amp;#34; tiers for AI users, creators, and businesses. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/27/meta-officially-launches-instagram-facebook-and-whatsapp-subscriptions-with-more-to-come-including-ai-plans/&quot; title=&quot;Meta launches Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp subscriptions, with more to come, including AI plans | TechCrunch    Meta is rolling out paid subscription plans for Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp worldwide, while also testing new AI, creator, and business-focused offerings under its broader “Meta One” subscription brand.    –:–:–:–    The first StrictlyVC of 2026 hits SF on April 30. Tickets are going fast. [Register…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The introduction of Meta subscriptions has sparked debate over whether paying for &amp;#34;free&amp;#34; services shifts development focus away from advertisers and toward user needs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350036&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m going to go against the grain here and say this is probably a positive thing for Meta products, and honestly every other &amp;#39;free&amp;#39; service to provide these kinds of revenue avenues. How many times do we hear things like &amp;#39;if the product is free, you are the product&amp;#39; - well, the consequence of that is development resources tend to be pulled into directions that benefit advertisers. By having material subscription revenue coming in for things outside the advertising space, the product managers…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48351660&quot; title=&quot;You can actually look this information up! For example, Instagram makes approx $2-50 ad revenue per user per year, depending on the region. Apparently it’s highest in North America. So &amp;lt;$5 per month for someone in the developed world to keep using Instagram and stop being the product. If they redesigned the app around what’s best for users vs advertisers, it actually seems like a great deal, considering many people spend multiple hours per day on apps like these. Of course this would get pretty…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users express a willingness to pay significant premiums for an ad-free experience focused solely on personal connections &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347725&quot; title=&quot;I would pay $49.99/mo for an unlimited plan that brings me only my friends&amp;#39; status updates (not their hyper-political likes and comments), just their life updates. Daily stories are great too. But JUST that, no influencers, no ads. I realize Meta&amp;#39;s data shows that our user revealed preferences tells them that we like all the dopamine hijacking garbage but that&amp;#39;s like saying &amp;#39;Well users like drugs, so we gave them more&amp;#39;. Let me pay you to give me just the vitamins, and none of the sugar.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350568&quot; title=&quot;Id pay money to not see ads. Like YouTube premium. And I’m sure I’m not the only one. Can’t believe they rolled out all these different plans and left out the one thing a lot of people would buy.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that subscriptions are merely additive and will not stop Meta from harvesting data or eventually reintroducing ads &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350900&quot; title=&quot;You paying just signals that you&amp;#39;re someone to push more ads to and to harvest more data on, since it means you have disposable income to spend on something as useless as instagram or facebook. Meta isn&amp;#39;t going to stop harvesting all your information just because you pay for a subscription, they&amp;#39;ll harvest and sell your data AND take your money.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350276&quot; title=&quot;Heard it here on HN: problem is paying a subscription is purely additive. eventually, inevitably, they’ll take the subscription AND sell your data, serve you ads, etc. it being against what your payment contract states just means they’ll reinvent and rename the tiers.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Skeptics maintain that the most effective solution is to abandon the platforms entirely in favor of direct communication or alternative apps like Signal &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348037&quot; title=&quot;Just stop using Meta products. It&amp;#39;s really not as hard as it seems. Nobody needs FB to communicate with friends and family. Send texts or emails or use your phone.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347823&quot; title=&quot;Pay each of your friends $50 one per month, to switch to signal. Problem solved&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://prismml.com/news/bonsai-image-4b&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1-Bit Bonsai Image 4B Image Generation for Local Devices&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (prismml.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346257&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;342 points · 122 comments · by modinfo&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PrismML has released Bonsai Image 4B, a family of 1-bit and ternary image-generation models designed for high-quality local inference on mobile devices and laptops with significantly reduced memory footprints. &lt;a href=&quot;https://prismml.com/news/bonsai-image-4b&quot; title=&quot;Title: Introducing 1-bit and Ternary Bonsai Image 4B: Image Generation for Local Devices    URL Source: https://prismml.com/news/bonsai-image-4b    Published Time: 2026-05-26    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/699604cc2b9dd89bdbda0608/6a15cec375689f915406cc3c_grid.png)    Images generated from Ternary Bonsai Image 4B    Today we’re releasing **Bonsai Image 4B**, a family of compact image-generation models designed to run high-quality diffusion inference on local hardware:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The development of 1-bit image generation models sparks debate over whether local hardware can realistically compete with cloud subscriptions. While some argue that data centers will always maintain a &amp;#34;logic&amp;#34; and performance edge &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348358&quot; title=&quot;Ok heres the thing you will nevwr be able to truly do this due to logic. Logically five people pooling their resources beats one guy. therefore datacenters will always win because they get higher time utilization. so forget it. I always wonder the same but i let logic tell me its a fantasy, on average you cant outspend a whole group of people making better use of the hardware. you will get better hardware though, cutting edge will always be cloud&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others provide detailed anecdotes showing that high-volume agentic workflows—processing billions of tokens—can be significantly cheaper to run locally than via APIs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347022&quot; title=&quot;I actually can’t wait for the future where I upgrade hardware in order to upgrade my ai as an alternative to an expensive subscription. There are many problems I want to work on which require billions of tokens. These are completely inaccessible without corporate project sponsorship at the moment. An asic generation machine which can pump out a few 10s of thousands of tokens per second at opus4.6 quality is more than sufficient.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48349793&quot; title=&quot;Right now - there&amp;#39;s some heavily subsidized subscriptions that are more or less cheating.  For instance, Github CoPilot at $39/month gives you claude opus 4.6. They&amp;#39;re going to close that off, but right now it&amp;#39;s like a freebie for those doing API agentic harnesses. That said, if you are doing always on agents and you spend $3k-$4k on a GB10 or, $5+ k on Apple Silicon as your sunk cost, you will probably come out ahead. I&amp;#39;ve got 5 agents running a purely experimental social experiment. AThey…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics question the utility of extreme compression if it doesn&amp;#39;t improve generation speed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347808&quot; title=&quot;Genuine question: is this solving a real problem? IME, the bottleneck when using diffusion models isn&amp;#39;t storage space or memory, it&amp;#39;s generation time.  Lots of models will run on 8-12 GB 1080-generation GPUs onwards, or on Macs with similar memory, which are probably the bottom end from a GPU power perspective anyway.  I also note that these models are marginally slower than the small FLUX.2 model they&amp;#39;re based on. Okay, maybe this allows running a local model on something that has a reasonably…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, while others express a broader cultural concern that the proliferation of these tools marks an era of &amp;#34;rubbish&amp;#34; where genuine content can no longer be trusted &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48351235&quot; title=&quot;Twenty years ago, I don&amp;#39;t think any of us were excited about a future internet where we couldn&amp;#39;t trust whether what we were seeing or reading was genuine. I hope one day we&amp;#39;ll be able to look back on this era as an aberration, like that scene in Mad Men where the Drapers fling their picnic rubbish onto the grass and drive away.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.tymscar.com/posts/v100localllm/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I put a datacenter GPU in my gaming PC&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.tymscar.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48345694&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;295 points · 168 comments · by birdculture&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By using a £50 adapter to install a secondhand £150 Tesla V100 datacenter GPU, a user successfully doubled their gaming PC&amp;#39;s VRAM to 32GB, enabling high-speed local execution of a 27-billion parameter AI model for a fraction of the cost of modern consumer hardware. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.tymscar.com/posts/v100localllm/&quot; title=&quot;Title: I Put a Datacenter GPU in My Gaming PC for £200    URL Source: https://blog.tymscar.com/posts/v100localllm/    Published Time: 2026-05-30 12:00:00 +0000 UTC    Markdown Content:  I already had an RTX 4080. 16GB of VRAM. Good enough for gaming, not good enough for the models I wanted to run locally. The next step up in GPU land is either spend a fortune on a card with more VRAM, or find another way.    I found another way.    I bought a datacenter GPU that doesn’t even have a normal PCIe connector,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the technical and economic viability of using decommissioned datacenter GPUs like the NVIDIA V100 or AMD MI100 for local LLM experimentation, with users highlighting significant cooling challenges and the lack of modern features like bfloat16 support &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347653&quot; title=&quot;I also recently decided to buy a datacenter GPU and slap it into a system. Some notes from my experience that the author doesn&amp;#39;t mention in their article: Decommissioned NVIDIA V100s and AMD MI50s are fairly cheap, $200 for 16gb and $400-500 for 32gb, for local experimentation. They are also very old. There&amp;#39;s an enthusiast community keeping these two cards alive and working with current platforms and models. Nitpick, but the V100 doesn&amp;#39;t support bfloat16. The performance hit is not a big deal…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that self-hosting is rarely more economical than using APIs for most users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346217&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; And yes, if you want the absolute best, Opus 4.8 exists. It also costs more per 20 minutes of heavy use than I paid for this entire GPU and adapter setup combined. But the gap is shockingly small. I don&amp;#39;t think this is a fair characterization of the situation. I use frontier models via API pre-paid tokens every single day, and I can barely rack up $100 per month . The fact that we figured out how to burn double this in 20 minutes is impressive, but I don&amp;#39;t think it reflects the reality that…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others emphasize the importance of keeping these cards out of landfills through enthusiast community support &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48345961&quot; title=&quot;Some resell group is going to have to make this easier. The shear amount of these cards otherwise heading towards the landfill is staggering. That is if Big Tech don&amp;#39;t destroy them to prevent model weights from leaking.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant portion of the thread is dedicated to criticizing the article&amp;#39;s prose, which many readers found to be distractingly formulaic and indicative of AI-assisted writing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48345897&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The compute is still real. The VRAM is still real. And the memory bandwidth is where it gets genuinely surprising. Because humans write exactly like this /s&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346616&quot; title=&quot;There are many tells aren&amp;#39;t there? There was clearly hard human work and experimentation here, but it&amp;#39;s a shame the OP let AI do chunks of the writing. Once you see it, it&amp;#39;s much harder to take the post seriously.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346048&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The compute is still real. The VRAM is still real. And the memory bandwidth is where it gets genuinely surprising. Had to stop there. Annoying. I can&amp;#39;t stand AI use for writing. It makes any otherwise great article feel so disingenuous.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346838&quot; title=&quot;I disagree. Not everyone has a good writing style. In those instances I think it is fair to default to llm recommendation. We may be allergic to it, but we saw one formulaic response too many ( though admittedly it does raise a question of whether HN was the intended audience for it ). In any event, not all of us have a unique writing style worth preserving just like not all of us can write clear and clean code. Just saying.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://diamondgeezer.blogspot.com/2026/05/londons-free-roof-terraces.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;London&amp;#39;s Free Roof Terraces&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (diamondgeezer.blogspot.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48343714&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;284 points · 135 comments · by zeristor&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author reviews several free public roof terraces in London, highlighting accessible options like The Garden at 120 and One New Change while noting that others, such as the Tate Modern’s Level 10, have restricted access due to privacy lawsuits or maintenance. &lt;a href=&quot;https://diamondgeezer.blogspot.com/2026/05/londons-free-roof-terraces.html&quot; title=&quot;diamond geezer    |  |  |  | --- | --- |  | [![](https://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3579/104/1600/jd.jpg &amp;#39;click for diamond geezer homepage&amp;#39;)](http://diamondgeezer.blogspot.com/ncr) diamond geezer Friday, May 22, 2026 *A few years ago some City speculators spotted they were more likely to get planning permission if their new skyscraper included a free public roof terrace. Free access to elevated views is always a winner in my book. So yesterday I went up a few.    This was all on-the-hoof so I…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While London&amp;#39;s free roof terraces are popular &amp;#34;must-visit&amp;#34; destinations, users argue that the experience is often marred by &amp;#34;hostile&amp;#34; barriers to entry, including mandatory advance bookings, aggressive security screenings, and prohibitions on photography or outside food &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48344617&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; more likely to get planning permission if their new skyscraper included a free public roof terrace If that&amp;#39;s the deal, it&amp;#39;s crazy that some of those places are getting away with then discouraging the public from actually going there. Book your visit in advance! Present ID! Photography forbidden! This grumpy security guard will be hovering nearby &amp;lt;3 It&amp;#39;s like Nathan For You S03E01 where a store advertises a $1 TV, then tells the drawn in would-be customers to please respect the black tie dress…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48344726&quot; title=&quot;You must book in advance because they’re incredibly popular, huge queues, long waits, and capacity limits. The Sky Garden (Fenchurch Building) is huge, beautiful and absolutely packed with people. Many people consider it a London must visit. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/20_Fenchurch_Street#Sky_garden&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48345314&quot; title=&quot;Capacity may indeed be a reason for requiring advance bookings. But it doesn&amp;#39;t explain the ridiculous security (scanning gates, had to take off my hat and belt, insulin pump was inspected), the prohibition of &amp;#39;professional&amp;#39; photography equipment, prohibition of own food and drinks (again, diabetes, I want to carry some lemonade and a bar for emergency), etc etc. Is it to counter terrorism? To boost consuming at the establishments? Or is it a lame excuse thats in reality just a higher bar to…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics suggest these measures reflect a broader trend of &amp;#34;privately owned&amp;#34; public spaces in London where visitors are made to feel unwelcome &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48344637&quot; title=&quot;This is the country where organised marches must have police approval and follow an approved route (and most acute in London). Hardly a surprise! London&amp;#39;s vibe is: &amp;#39;privately owned, and you&amp;#39;re lucky to be here&amp;#39; Edit: I&amp;#39;m British btw (and currently sat in a pub in London) in case people downvote me thinking I&amp;#39;m a yank lol. There are many people who dislike London and the UK who aren&amp;#39;t yanks&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48344958&quot; title=&quot;There is a similar trap in walking the Thames path through London. Some is privately owned and you are made to not feel welcome, odd rules, buttons to press etc. Guardian has a 2015 piece https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/feb/24/private-londo...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant point of contention is the closure of the Tate Modern&amp;#39;s terrace following a lawsuit by neighboring residents; while some view the ruling as a protection against &amp;#34;zoo-like&amp;#34; visual intrusion, others argue it was a case of bias favoring wealthy property owners &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48344382&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Tate Modern had high hopes for the 10th floor of the Blatnavik Building with its cafe and a four-sided observation terrace with excellent views of the Thames. Alas it also had great views into the apartments at Neo Bankside whose residents ultimately sued and won, thus if you arrive by lift today you can only visit the cafe. I was curious about what type of arguments you could make to win a case like this. &amp;#39;The Supreme Court commented that the degree of overlooking from visitors to the Tate…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48344405&quot; title=&quot;It affected rich people, wouldn&amp;#39;t surprise me if one of them knew the judge.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48344609&quot; title=&quot;The case was a very big deal in London. The outcome was not one of bias, but complicated circumstance. The apartment building was built years before the Tate Modern opened their viewing floor. After the Tate Modern viewing floor opened, visitors to the Tate Modern began photographing and videoing and watching people in the neighbouring apartment building. The judge reasonably determined that there is some sacrifice of privacy made when choosing to live in a glass apartment building, but the…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48344976&quot; title=&quot;How can privacy be egregiously violated? Isn’t it just you have a window to look in or not? And every building has windows to look in if you choose to not draw the blinds?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://variety.com/2026/film/box-office/backrooms-box-office-record-opening-weekend-obsession-jumps-star-wars-crumbles-1236763355/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;#39;Backrooms&amp;#39; Stuns with $81M Debut&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (variety.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348864&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;188 points · 117 comments · by mindcrime&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A24’s horror film *Backrooms* broke records with an $81 million domestic debut, leading a weekend where indie horror outperformed major franchises like *The Mandalorian and Grogu*, which suffered a 70% drop. &lt;a href=&quot;https://variety.com/2026/film/box-office/backrooms-box-office-record-opening-weekend-obsession-jumps-star-wars-crumbles-1236763355/&quot; title=&quot;Box Office: ‘Backrooms’ Stuns With $81 Million Debut, ‘Obsession’ Has Another Unprecedented Jump, ‘Mandalorian and Grogu’ Suffers 70% Drop    It was a great weekend for moviegoing as &amp;#39;Backrooms&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;Obsession&amp;#39; fueled record turnouts.    ![an image, when javascript is unavailable](https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&amp;amp;c2=6035310&amp;amp;c4=&amp;amp;cv=3.9&amp;amp;cj=1)    * [Plus Icon      Film](https://variety.com/v/film/)  * [Plus Icon      TV](https://variety.com/v/tv/)  * [Plus Icon      What To…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The massive debut of *Backrooms* is seen as a sign of audience hunger for original stories and &amp;#34;liminal&amp;#34; concepts over the risk-averse sequels favored by major studios &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48349957&quot; title=&quot;That really shows the hunger for original stories and IC among cinephiles. Major studios were too afraid to produce something fresh instead of numberless sequels and reboots in the last decade or so.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350192&quot; title=&quot;The what? Horror something? ....started on 4chan? Yeah, immediate aboutface here. And reading wiki articles about it that throw around words like &amp;#39;creepypasta&amp;#39; like that&amp;#39;s widely understood? Liminal spaces I get. Reminds of Severance . And anyways, how is this worth going to a theater for? A24 has done well. Is 81M considered breaching &amp;#39;mainstream&amp;#39;? Because these niche horror things being portrayed as part of the greater &amp;#39;culture&amp;#39; is tiring.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350629&quot; title=&quot;A darkened theater with a glowing screen is precisely the sort of liminal space that is the topic of the movie. $20 to fall through the skin of the world for a couple hours? Seems like a no-brainer to me, given how rare and precious any liminal feeling at all is these days. And, if I go support this, maybe they’ll finally make a House of Leaves movie. One can dream.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters attribute Hollywood&amp;#39;s stagnation to the loss of DVD revenue &amp;#34;safety nets&amp;#34; and a corporate culture that prioritizes internal politics over empowering young, talented creators &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350507&quot; title=&quot;Matt Damon talked about this somewhere. The risk aversion stems from the move away from DVD sales. Historically a lot of low and mid budget movies relied on DVD sales to recoup costs even if theater releases didn’t get you as much money as you expected. With the safety net gone, studios don’t want to take the risk. They make big budget movies with massive marketing budgets that rely on known IP and established fan bases to guarantee income. This also ensures that the story itself is average…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350537&quot; title=&quot;All they had to do was simply hire a talented person who knows how to make compelling narrative art. This is lost on the movie industry, though Hollywood has been treading water for over a decade now, failing to examine its failures and coasting on inertia. In general, there is sooo much free money on the ground for large, hierarchical American corporations to do the following 1. Give young talented people resources and freedom 2. Don&amp;#39;t put them through endless bullshit internal status games…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate whether a &amp;#34;Steam for movies&amp;#34; could revitalize the industry, others argue that digital ownership remains fragile due to platform restrictions and the risk of revoked access &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350611&quot; title=&quot;It’s because nobody has made Steam for Movies. Let me have a movie collection that I can buy movies $1-$5 per movie and never lose it and I promise you I will buy a lot more movies. Just like people buy hundreds of steam games&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48351055&quot; title=&quot;The iTunes movie store is not friendly outside of the Apple ecosystem. Making the entire idea not really affordable since you need a expensive electronic device to utilize it sanely. Might as well find another way to get to it at that point.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48351265&quot; title=&quot;But if you use the app you’re only streaming from Apple servers. That Apple server copy can be revoked at any time. And 60% is not 100%, my point stands you need an expensive device just to purchase and watch it. Probably multiple expensive devices if you want to actually watch it on your TV. When can I download my movie onto my Linux laptop and play it through an HDMI cable?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tylercipriani.com/blog/2026/05/28/chuwi-minibook-x/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chuwi Minibook X&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tylercipriani.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350598&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;172 points · 128 comments · by thcipriani&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Chuwi Minibook X is a $350, 10.5-inch sub-ultrabook that offers a portable &amp;#34;netbook&amp;#34; experience with 16GB RAM and solid Linux compatibility, despite hardware quirks like a sideways-mounted screen. While the keyboard and touchpad are mediocre, its sturdy build and low price make it an ideal secondary device. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tylercipriani.com/blog/2026/05/28/chuwi-minibook-x/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Chuwi Minibook X: the netbook we deserve    URL Source: https://tylercipriani.com/blog/2026/05/28/chuwi-minibook-x/    Published Time: Sun, 31 May 2026 22:56:10 GMT    Markdown Content:  Netbooks are dead, but the Chuwi Minibook X scratches the same itch.    The Minibook X is a 10.5″ x86_64 sub-ultrabook with 16GB RAM, a 512GB NVMe drive, and only one majorly annyoing Linux quirk.    I needed a knock-around laptop, so I bought myself a Minibook for my birthday last year. The more I tote it around,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether modern Chromebooks have truly replaced the &amp;#34;netbook&amp;#34; niche, with some arguing they lack the utility of a full desktop OS &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48351078&quot; title=&quot;Netbooks aren&amp;#39;t dead, they&amp;#39;re just called Chromebooks now&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48351145&quot; title=&quot;Chromebooks aren&amp;#39;t netbooks. They&amp;#39;re Android tablets with non-removable keyboards. The idea of a netbook was very small, cheap, portable, full-featured computer that you could use like a normal computer . All the ports, your desktop OS, and so on. Chromebooks ain&amp;#39;t it, even if they compete in the market segment that made netbooks a success.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt; while others contend that Linux integration (Crostini) or firmware modification makes them superior, highly efficient tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48351252&quot; title=&quot;That sounds like an opinion baked in 2013 and never revisited.  A modern chromebook with Crostini can run basically any Linux desktop stack you want.  Like, what exactly are the tasks you need from a &amp;#39; computer that you could use like a normal computer &amp;#39; that you aren&amp;#39;t getting today? As a data point: I&amp;#39;m 100% converted personally.  A Chromebook is what goes into my backpack and the device I use for all my general day-to-day UI clickery, and it&amp;#39;s a better fit for my needs than Windows (not…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48351421&quot; title=&quot;So replace the OS: https://docs.mrchromebox.tech/ I&amp;#39;ve done that with mine.  Worked great, and now I get around 30 hours of battery life with a lean linux distro, as long as I&amp;#39;m only like reading websites or writing on it.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant debate exists over value, as some users prefer the Chuwi’s ultra-portable 900g form factor &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48351877&quot; title=&quot;This laptop has a 10” screen, weighs 900 grams and runs an efficient N100 cpu. Different category to a 15” 2kg cheap 5 year old dell.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, while others argue that used enterprise laptops like the Dell XPS or Lenovo X1 Carbon offer better performance and build quality for the same $350 price point &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48351450&quot; title=&quot;Used laptops are such a good deal that you could something high quality in excellent condition for so little that I almost can&amp;#39;t justify buying something like this. Like used Dell XPS laptops are ridiculously cheap and they&amp;#39;re amazing for the used price. Or really buy any laptop rated highly by Dave2D or other reviewers that&amp;#39;s 4 to 5 years old.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48351648&quot; title=&quot;What decent secondhand thing can you find at $350. It is being thrown away in the first place for a reason.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48352177&quot; title=&quot;A used x1 carbon is a better deal, faster, and weighs about the same with a bigger screen.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, there is nostalgia for older niche designs like the Sony Vaio P, with users lamenting the lack of integrated cellular radios in modern small-form-factor devices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350915&quot; title=&quot;I miss my Sony Vaio P series which fitted in a similar sort of niche, the cellphone radio made it just by far the best laptop I&amp;#39;ve ever used. Modern laptops don&amp;#39;t seem to have provision for a LTE/5G radio which always confuses me a bit, in this form factor it would be ideal. I&amp;#39;m surprised nobody has cloned this actually, with phone screens being the right aspect ratio it seems obvious. https://www.zdnet.com/a/img/2014/10/03/9f923860-4b47-11e4-b6...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://peninsulaforeveryone.org/blog/atherton-spent-145k-to-delay-caltrain-electrification-the-rest-of-us-paid-400-million-and-waited-3-extra-years/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Atherton spent $145K to delay train electrification. The rest of us paid $400M&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (peninsulaforeveryone.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350131&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;191 points · 91 comments · by mslate&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Atherton’s unsuccessful 2015 lawsuit against Caltrain electrification caused a three-year delay and $400 million in cost increases by stalling federal funding and construction. In response, California passed AB 2503 to exempt similar rail projects from the environmental reviews exploited in the litigation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://peninsulaforeveryone.org/blog/atherton-spent-145k-to-delay-caltrain-electrification-the-rest-of-us-paid-400-million-and-waited-3-extra-years/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Atherton spent ~$145K to delay Caltrain electrification. The rest of us paid $400 million and waited 3 extra years    URL Source: https://peninsulaforeveryone.org/blog/atherton-spent-145k-to-delay-caltrain-electrification-the-rest-of-us-paid-400-million-and-waited-3-extra-years/    Markdown Content:  # Atherton spent ~$145K to delay Caltrain electrification. The rest of us paid $400 million and waited 3 extra years    [Peninsula for Everyone![Image 2: Peninsula for…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights intense frustration with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which commenters argue has been &amp;#34;weaponized&amp;#34; by wealthy enclaves like Atherton to delay environmentally beneficial transit projects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350340&quot; title=&quot;CEQA is basically a weapon for the rich to stop anything.  It needs massive reform.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350718&quot; title=&quot;Train electrification would at minimum reduce pollution from diesel trains, and in the case of Caltrain, improve train services and reduce the number of cars on the road. It is peak irony that a piece of environmental regulation is being used here to delay the upgrade works. On brand for California, of course.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Users point to the hypocrisy of prominent residents who publicly advocate for building while privately lobbying against local development to protect property values &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350587&quot; title=&quot;Atherton resident Marc Andreessen Apr 18th 2020: &amp;#39;It&amp;#39;s Time To Build&amp;#39; &amp;#39;We can’t build nearly enough housing in our cities&amp;#39;[0] Andreessen family 2 years later: &amp;#39;IMMENSELY AGAINST multifamily development! I am writing this letter to communicate our IMMENSE objection to the creation of multifamily overlay zones in Atherton... They will MASSIVELY decrease our home values&amp;#39;[1] [0] https://a16z.com/its-time-to-build/ [1] https://therealdeal.com/san-francisco/2022/08/08/marc-andree...&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate the necessity of stripping local governments of their power to prevent such delays &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350494&quot; title=&quot;Local governments are obsolete, a holdover from when you had to have a government entity over areas within a day’s horseback ride. States should disestablish these towns and counties and reorganize them as administrative subdivisions of the state that answer directly to the governor and state legislature.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others question the article&amp;#39;s financial breakdown of the $400 million cost and its potential status as AI-generated content &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350720&quot; title=&quot;The HN rules need to expand to ban all AI generated posts.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350647&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; They lost. So why did it still cost us $400 million? Did the article provide a direct answer to this? I see the $20M delay payments to contractors and the rise of labor costs cited, but is that all?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350638&quot; title=&quot;if we are going to complain about AI content then i suggest we also include some evidence to make the argument at least somewhat insightful. i&amp;#39;ll start: pangram gives this a 100% score (without the sources section), on account of the em-dashes. remove those and the score drops to 49%. include the sources and the score drops to 36%. (edit, i misread the score: after removal of the em-dashes the result is 48% generated and 49% assisted, add the sources, then it is 33% generated, 36% assisted, and…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lucasfcosta.com/blog/backpressure-is-all-you-need&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Backpressure is all you need&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lucasfcosta.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48345090&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;175 points · 98 comments · by lucasfcosta&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To improve the safety and efficiency of AI coding agents, developers should implement automated &amp;#34;backpressure&amp;#34; mechanisms—such as linting, testing, and multi-stage agentic reviews—to validate code quality and correctness before human intervention is required. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lucasfcosta.com/blog/backpressure-is-all-you-need&quot; title=&quot;Title: Backpressure is all you need    URL Source: https://www.lucasfcosta.com/blog/backpressure-is-all-you-need    Markdown Content:  There are two _obvious_ ways to use coding agents. Both are bad.    The first is to let the LLM run unattended and hope the repository survives. This is fast, exciting, and stupid. It leads to bugs, confused changes, and a flood of PRs that humans cannot review quickly enough, at least not without eventually lowering their standards and merging things they do not…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on using automated &amp;#34;self-verification&amp;#34; loops to reduce the burden on human reviewers, with some users reporting significant productivity gains by building custom harnesses that iterate until unit and integration tests pass &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48345380&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;In this post, I’ll cover a third, not-so-obvious approach: building ways for the agent to validate more of its own work before a human has to step in. &amp;#39; this has been an obvious thing to do since at least January (since Geoffrey Huntley published &amp;#39;everything is a ralph loop&amp;#39;), and this is how I&amp;#39;ve been working: build enough orchestration tooling to be able to automate everything: development container bringup, building it, running the unit tests, doing integration testing, and using the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48345648&quot; title=&quot;This is where most of my productivity gains have come, I have a special harness I move from project to project now that does my testing orchestration, lots of my work day is setting up a prompt or two early and just letting them loop till they return evidence that the feature is working having gone through the big QA loop. I&amp;#39;ve slowly been optimizing for token use through the stack and Claude ends up making very tight for loops for most of the process and keeping token count even lower. It&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347172&quot; title=&quot;for us it&amp;#39;s (usually) very easy as I work on performance optimization. a non-negligible part of this is correctness and verifiability, so we already have some of that. to give you an example just recently I&amp;#39;ve coded a feature that for our shuffle operation can report which channel did the bytes flow through (as the PR giving us the plumbing underneath has landed upstream recently). what this basically means is that you run the shuffle, you know you&amp;#39;ve shuffled X bytes (because you have stats on…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue that the term &amp;#34;backpressure&amp;#34; is misapplied, as the proposed methods function more as a &amp;#34;throttle&amp;#34; or structured feedback loop rather than a signal of downstream capacity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48345458&quot; title=&quot;Isn&amp;#39;t this a bit of an incorrect usage of the term &amp;#39;backpressure&amp;#39;? OP quoted the correct definition right at the start: &amp;gt; In systems engineering, backpressure is the mechanism by which a downstream component signals upstream that it can&amp;#39;t accept more work (the &amp;#39;downstream component&amp;#39; being the human reviewer in this case) But the measures they propose don&amp;#39;t actually do that. They are more like fixed throttle elements which would slow down the rate of submissions of an agent and weed out some…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48345557&quot; title=&quot;A very long post about a simple and very obvious idea with many different implementations. The three main problems are 1) API usage is deadly expensive 2) Claude is about to make all automation very expensive 3) all the flows where a model has the initiative are strictly biased towards unwarranted stops (checkpointing). Also, I won&amp;#39;t call that &amp;#39;backpressure&amp;#39;, there is no producer-consumer disbalance or something similar. From what I can see, the author just proposes a structured feedback loop.…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also skepticism regarding the efficiency of these &amp;#34;over-engineered&amp;#34; agentic workflows, with some developers preferring manual micro-iterations over large-scale automated plans that risk high API costs and code degradation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48345306&quot; title=&quot;I’m willing to be wrong but this industry-wide emphasis on AI creative/coding workflows seems way over-engineered. Ime successful creative execution looks like micro-iterations where each output informs the next creative move. I can build something incredibly fast from essentially caveman grunt instructions through an LLM harness, iterating as I go. Optimizing for feeding a huge plan to an agent sounds to me like a net waste of time. And looking over the shoulder of industry peers trying to do…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48345557&quot; title=&quot;A very long post about a simple and very obvious idea with many different implementations. The three main problems are 1) API usage is deadly expensive 2) Claude is about to make all automation very expensive 3) all the flows where a model has the initiative are strictly biased towards unwarranted stops (checkpointing). Also, I won&amp;#39;t call that &amp;#39;backpressure&amp;#39;, there is no producer-consumer disbalance or something similar. From what I can see, the author just proposes a structured feedback loop.…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347307&quot; title=&quot;Definitely agree that performance optimization is a good use case for LLMs. Here you have both a measurable goal / objective function and guardrails against functional regressions. It kind of closes the loop in that regard. One thing however is a test suite is not usually exhaustive in the sense that any code that passes the tests is valid. Usually tests are more complimentary in nature. Therefore you could still possibly get code degradation, potentially.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://deflock.org/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Deflock hits 100k ALPRs Mapped in USA&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (deflock.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347370&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;205 points · 61 comments · by pilingual&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DeFlock has successfully mapped 100,000 Automated License Plate Readers across the United States to raise awareness about the privacy risks and lack of warrants associated with these AI-powered vehicle tracking systems. &lt;a href=&quot;https://deflock.org/&quot; title=&quot;Title: DeFlock    URL Source: https://deflock.org/    Markdown Content:  ## What are ALPRs    Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs or LPRs) are AI-powered cameras that capture and analyze images of **all passing vehicles**, storing details like your car&amp;#39;s **location, date, and time**. They also capture your car&amp;#39;s **make, model, color**, and **identifying features** such as dents, roof racks, and bumper stickers, often turning these into **searchable data points**.    These cameras collect data on…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The community views Deflock as a necessary pushback against pervasive surveillance, though some question why similar resistance isn&amp;#39;t directed at private tools like Ring or mobile tracking &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347494&quot; title=&quot;Nice to see some pushback in the most egregious abuses of privacy. I wonder why we are getting this with Flock but not seeing the same with private security cameras such as Ring, pervasive tracking of mobile devices by carriers and apps, and internet browser tracking. Is it just that there&amp;#39;s a direct personal benefit with those devices, and people view the trade-off as being worth it?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348321&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s ironic seeing this here since Flock is YCombinator company.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that mapping efforts may be &amp;#34;too little too late&amp;#34; or easily bypassed by federal installations, others advocate for state-level legislation to permanently dismantle corporate surveillance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348313&quot; title=&quot;I so want to push back that all this is too little too late, because the system ,though still distributed , is effectively in place already. But.. I also don&amp;#39;t want to be the old guy telling kids not to rebel. After all, being young and thinking ( knowing! ) one can change the world, is what being young human is all about. FWIW, it may well be their version of decss, ows and so on. On the other hand, come to think of it, despite OWS being broken up by fancy new approaches ( rumor has it, Walls…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348715&quot; title=&quot;With a nationwide effort in swing to dismantle corporate surveillance, the follow up is to pass legislation state by state that prohibits its implementation in the future. Federal legislation on this matter is unlikely to occur until sometime after midterms, and so state legislation is the path to success in the interim.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348770&quot; title=&quot;We voted out the cameras locally, the feds just installed them at every nook and cranny they had available.  Turned out, there was a lot of federal property, so it was back to square one.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also touched on the efficacy of physical sabotage against cameras and the background of Flock’s leadership regarding mandatory military service &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348201&quot; title=&quot;The senior director of connectivity there is former IDF. Probably nothing.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48349740&quot; title=&quot;Ring is dead near me. Everyone had Ring doorbells until someone went around with a hammer and fucked them all up.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48349024&quot; title=&quot;Since military service is mandatory in Israel, it means that basically any Israeli (with the exception of Hasidic Jews), male or female, is, not by choice, ex-IDF. It isn&amp;#39;t a signal of their choices, or willing participation, just of where they were born. If you don&amp;#39;t know this, now you do. If you knew this already...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://justine.lol/rseq/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Restartable Sequences&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (justine.lol)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346019&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;203 points · 51 comments · by grappler&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Linux&amp;#39;s restartable sequences (`rseq`) allow developers to create high-performance, thread-safe data structures without locks or atomics by using kernel-assisted instruction sequences. This technique can improve `malloc` performance by over 40x on high-core-count CPUs by eliminating synchronization contention across sharded data structures. &lt;a href=&quot;https://justine.lol/rseq/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Restartable Sequences    URL Source: https://justine.lol/rseq/    Published Time: Sun, 31 May 2026 07:40:14 GMT    Markdown Content:  May 31 st, 2026 @ [justine&amp;#39;s web page](https://justine.lol/index.html)    [![Image 1: [Picture of Tux the Linux penguin mascot enthusiastically flapping looking down at a black circle loop with an arrowhead pointing over an egg, with arm64 assembly instructions inside]](https://worker.jart.workers.dev/rseq/rseq.png)](https://justine.lol/rseq/rseq.png)    The best…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Restartable sequences (`rseq`) allow for atomic operations without traditional mutexes or atomics by using a shared memory interface with the kernel to ensure a sequence of instructions completes without interruption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346479&quot; title=&quot;If you had no idea what a restorable sequence is the takeaway is about halfway down the OP: “This is why Linux now provides rseq() which is a much more enlightened solution. With restartable sequences, you actually can get rid of both the mutex and atomics, while the OS continues to fully abstract scheduling. The way it works is you advise the kernel whenever your program enters a critical section of code that you don&amp;#39;t want interrupted. It&amp;#39;s probably going to be maybe 10 assembly instructions…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347697&quot; title=&quot;That doesn&amp;#39;t really explain it though, IMO.    IIUC, it&amp;#39;s a sequence of instructions that either runs to completion atomically or doesn&amp;#39;t.   If it is interrupted by anything the kernel jumps you to the abort/retry vector you set with a guarantee that the last instruction in the sequence was not executed. (Based on my reading of the LWN article rwmj posted).&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While the author claims userspace implementations can outperform the CPU&amp;#39;s internal cache coherency mechanisms (described as &amp;#34;internal mutexes&amp;#34;), commenters debate whether software can truly be more efficient than hardware in this context &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348951&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; chances are the CPU&amp;#39;s internal mutexes aren&amp;#39;t as good as the ones you&amp;#39;ve implemented in userspace Anyone with an informed opinion on this statement? It&amp;#39;s seems counter intuitive (npi).&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48349220&quot; title=&quot;The &amp;#39;CPU mutex&amp;#39; is just the cache coherency mechanism. If you shard your data to avoid triggering it as suggested, then yes, it&amp;#39;s much faster. EDIT: or maybe you&amp;#39;re asking if introducing an explicit userspace mutex is better than a lockless algorithm with false sharing issues. The answer is that it&amp;#39;s workload dependent but it definitely can be.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48349497&quot; title=&quot;Let&amp;#39;s try this again: OP &amp;gt; The issue is this will likely go just as slow if not slower. The mere act of sharing the same 64-byte region of memory (a.k.a. cacheline) between multiple cores, causes the CPU internally to basically use a mutex, and chances are the CPU&amp;#39;s internal mutexes aren&amp;#39;t as good as the ones you&amp;#39;ve implemented in userspace. The claim by OP is that &amp;#39;chances are&amp;#39; that userspace mutexes are better than CPU&amp;#39;s internal mutexes. So either h/w guys are (for a first) lagging s/w folks…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, some readers were distracted or deterred by the author&amp;#39;s elitist tone regarding expensive hardware and personal financial requests &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346469&quot; title=&quot;Maybe I&amp;#39;m just getting old but the &amp;#39;if you don&amp;#39;t spend $20,000 on a workstation you&amp;#39;re going to be left behind like a dinosaur&amp;#39; at the top of this article is a huge turn off to reading any further. And I say that as someone who owns a workstation with more cores than the author&amp;#39;s.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348026&quot; title=&quot;The author was also asking for money to buy a house in SF and travel on private planes like a few days ago..the donation must have really showed up if they are using 20k machines at home.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mechanical-pencil.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mechanical Pencil: An illustrated celebration of the engineering around us&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mechanical-pencil.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341932&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;181 points · 23 comments · by Muhammad523&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mechanical Pencil is an educational website by engineer and artist Bryan Macomber that uses detailed illustrations and animations to explain the internal mechanics of everyday objects like pens, lighters, and dispensers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mechanical-pencil.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Mechanical Pencil    URL Source: https://mechanical-pencil.com/    Published Time: Sun, 31 May 2026 02:36:13 GMT    Markdown Content:  **Welcome!** Are you curious why a clicky [Pen](https://mechanical-pencil.com/#grid-pen)... clicks? How a [Zippo Lighter](https://mechanical-pencil.com/#grid-zippo) flips open? Or what lives inside a [Pez Dispenser](https://mechanical-pencil.com/#grid-pez)?    I&amp;#39;ve illustrated tear-downs and break-downs of everyday products that you may have taken for granted.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion celebrates the intricate engineering of mechanical pencils, with users highlighting the Pentel GraphGear 500 as a benchmark for reliability and simplicity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346919&quot; title=&quot;The mechanical pencil, though disclaimed by the webmaster as not an exclusive theme, is a subject worthy of worship. I have a handcrafted cocobolo holder for my Pentel GraphGear 500, and a protective travel case too. Despite not being very active for the last 4 years, I keep a pile of refills nearby. I think the Japanese really mastered the pencil, though others have done their own wonders. I sometimes consider the work and design iterations behind the best designs and really admire it. Some…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347217&quot; title=&quot;Apparently we have similar tastes. A Pentel mechanical pencil was indispensable to me through college and a Fisher Space Pen is my daily carry in the working world. Though at my desk it is other pens with finer points.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters draw parallels between these mechanisms and other complex devices like mechanical watches and Leibniz wheels, though some noted technical omissions in the article&amp;#39;s explanation of cam rotation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48344769&quot; title=&quot;Reminds of Mechanical Watch: https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48343430&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve always enjoyed that the cam surface for that particular push-push mechanism design (click pen) is not that dissimilar from a Leibniz wheel. It&amp;#39;s so tempting to add more steps. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leibniz_wheel I can&amp;#39;t help myself and have to link some of my favorite youtube channels. Engineerguy: https://youtube.com/@engineerguyvideo Chris Staecker: https://youtube.com/@ChrisStaecker&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346199&quot; title=&quot;I took a look at the pen, but it&amp;#39;s missing an explanation of what gets the cam to rotate clockwise in the first place, such that it catches a tooth of the barrel.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48349730&quot; title=&quot;I was literally about to submit a mechanical watch as an example to the site im them submission, then i remembered I read the site you just linked to. My kid was amazed at all the gears and stuff in my mechanical watch&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While the site is praised as a &amp;#34;labor of love,&amp;#34; some users reported significant scrolling issues on mobile browsers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48343376&quot; title=&quot;Bryan has been working on this forever! Truly a labor of love. Neat to see it pop up here. He also does illustrations of homes around San Francisco (amongst other things), which I highly recommend checking out: https://www.instagram.com/bmacomber_art/&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48344725&quot; title=&quot;The website works like crap on Android Firefox. Scrolling is borked.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/may/31/daily-pill-daraxonrasib-double-survival-time-pancreatic-pancreas-cancer-clinical-trial&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Daily pill can double survival time for deadliest cancer, trial shows&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theguardian.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346629&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;154 points · 47 comments · by c-oreills&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A clinical trial of 500 patients found that a daily pill called daraxonrasib doubled the average survival time for advanced pancreatic cancer to 13.2 months. The drug targets the Kras protein to stop tumor growth and reported fewer side effects than traditional chemotherapy. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/may/31/daily-pill-daraxonrasib-double-survival-time-pancreatic-pancreas-cancer-clinical-trial&quot; title=&quot;Daily pill can double survival time for world’s deadliest cancer, trial shows    Experts hail daraxonrasib as ‘gamechanger’ for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer    [Skip to main content](#maincontent)[Skip to navigation](#navigation)    Close dialogue1/1Next imagePrevious imageToggle caption    [Print…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the new drug shows significant progress against a deadly cancer, the discussion highlights a stark divide over whether the extreme side effects—described by one patient as feeling like being doused in acid—constitute a &amp;#34;life worth living&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348090&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The company says that the drug was generally well tolerated, but that’s on the oncology scale. &amp;gt; ... &amp;gt; He’s been on daraxonrasib since early this year, and describes it this way: “. . .it’s a nasty drug. It causes crazy stuff like my body can’t grow skin and so I bleed all out of a whole bunch of parts of me that shouldn’t be bleeding” If you go to that link above, be prepared, because he also looks like he’s had aqua regia thrown all over him (and apparently feels a bit like that, too). But…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348562&quot; title=&quot;I am in the enviable position to not be actively dying from an untreatable disease, so obviously haven’t seen things from the other side of this sort of situation. But to me, that doesn’t sound like a life worth living. Obviously different people will have different thresholds for when to throw in the towel, and I’m glad that we are finding medicines to allow people to make the choices that align with their own drives. Still, I can’t help but think that this is the sort of life virtually none…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users argue that such grueling treatments are &amp;#34;almost criminal&amp;#34; and that a graceful exit is often more humane &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348562&quot; title=&quot;I am in the enviable position to not be actively dying from an untreatable disease, so obviously haven’t seen things from the other side of this sort of situation. But to me, that doesn’t sound like a life worth living. Obviously different people will have different thresholds for when to throw in the towel, and I’m glad that we are finding medicines to allow people to make the choices that align with their own drives. Still, I can’t help but think that this is the sort of life virtually none…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348254&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;survival&amp;#39; is the wrong word; its terminal. honestly the drugs and chemo and treatments they put pancreatic patients through for possibly a few more (not very nice) weeks is almost criminal. a good doctor will tell you to go make the most of those 3 months post diagnosis. that said its nice to see progress against one of the worst cancers out there and i hope it leads to genuine breakthroughs. but this drug is nothing anybody wants, even if they think they do&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend that the human mind is resilient and that patients should have the autonomy to choose more time, regardless of physical discomfort &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48349206&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Still, I can’t help but think that this is the sort of life virtually none of us would choose to inflict on our pets, even if cost was no option. We give them a far more graceful exit from this world than we give ourselves, and I think that’s worth considering. I often think about this, wondering how many of those animals would have chosen death if given the choice, and how often it is simply a way to spare the owner from seeing something that upsets them.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48349161&quot; title=&quot;This may sound condescending but: you sound young, not disabled, and extremely sheltered from being exposed to disabled people. I am in a position to be intimately familiar with illness. I will say that health is a spectrum and the mind is incredibly resilient. You will surprise yourself as you inevitably age how much your mind will adapt to always hurting. There is more to life than body discomfort. This patient sounds like he has his faculties and is making an informed decision to continue…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, commenters noted the disparity in global funding, pointing out that individual tech founders often receive more capital than the research teams behind such medical breakthroughs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48347463&quot; title=&quot;The founders of Lovable and Builder.ai individually received more funds than the whole group of the researchers behind this medicine...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48349602&quot; title=&quot;The pharmaceutical new drug development R&amp;amp;D market saw about $200 billion invested in 2025. &amp;lt; https://hardmanandco.com/research/corporate-research/2025-ph... &amp;gt; Total VC tech investment in 2025 was $425 billion. &amp;lt; https://news.crunchbase.com/venture/funding-data-third-large... &amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-30</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-30</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.brethorsting.com/blog/2026/05/domain-expertise-has-always-been-the-real-moat/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Domain expertise has always been the real moat&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (brethorsting.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48340411&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;829 points · 522 comments · by aaronbrethorst&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As agentic AI makes the mechanical task of writing code cheap, deep domain expertise has become the primary competitive advantage for ensuring software is actually correct and grounded in real-world truth. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.brethorsting.com/blog/2026/05/domain-expertise-has-always-been-the-real-moat/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Domain Expertise Has Always Been the Real Moat    URL Source: https://www.brethorsting.com/blog/2026/05/domain-expertise-has-always-been-the-real-moat/    Published Time: Sat, 30 May 2026 22:37:52 UTC    Markdown Content:  The hard part of writing software has never been the writing. It was building a working model of the domain in your head first. Before you could ship a payroll system you had to understand garnishments and pre-tax deductions and what happens when someone’s pay period…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether domain expertise remains a &amp;#34;moat&amp;#34; as AI lowers the barrier to software creation, with some arguing that understanding the problem space is now the primary differentiator &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48340835&quot; title=&quot;This is such a sane take. It is THE reality we have been always ignoring. Writing software has never been difficult. It is the domain that has been the issue. Always.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others contend that software engineering itself remains a difficult, distinct skill and that AI tools actually raise the bar for technical excellence by increasing the volume and complexity of work &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341723&quot; title=&quot;An idea that&amp;#39;s beginning to solidify for me is that AI tools make software development harder . It&amp;#39;s harder because they dramatically raise the bar for what&amp;#39;s possible to do. An individual developer can take on significantly more challenging projects now, because the ultimate constraint has always been time and AI can help you get more done in the time available. But the stuff you can get done with that time is a whole lot harder. You have to understand lots more things, and get radically…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48340770&quot; title=&quot;“The hard part of writing software has never been the writing.” I’m tired of these endless articles on HN about software engineers trying to reinvent their identity while trying not to lose touch with reality. One way of dealing with LLMs is to deny the skill level of LLMs. Claim they can’t code as well as you. This excuse works to a certain extent but it also fails because not only are their multitudes of cases where the LLM IS intrinsically worse than me… but there are multitudes of cases…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48340853&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Writing software has never been difficult. That&amp;#39;s not true at all, sure CRUD might not have been that difficult, but absolutely there is extremely complicated software out there that is really difficult to write in a performant and correct manner.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While &amp;#34;vibe coders&amp;#34; can now rapidly prototype applications, experts warn that these projects often suffer from fundamental structural flaws that still require professional engineering to resolve &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341073&quot; title=&quot;I recently reviewed an app built mostly with vibe coding. The owner said it was almost ready to launch and just needed a quick check. After looking through it, the database design was a mess. Some features worked, some didn’t. I explained the missing pieces and why things were breaking. Like OP said, he’s the domain expert. I used billions of tokens last month alone. The tools are getting better fast. But giving AI to a domain expert doesn’t mean you no longer need software engineers. A domain…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48342842&quot; title=&quot;You will never beat the vibe coders. The vibe coders have a key advantage you don’t: they don’t give a fuck. They blow through a task and move onto the next one. Management sees this as progress, and the vibe coders are rewarded. When shit breaks later on down the line, and fires have to be put out and things rewritten, the vibe coders do NOT get the blame. They do NOT get punished. Most engineering teams operate on a blameless culture. If code was approved for production, then it should have…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, there is skepticism toward any definitive &amp;#34;moat&amp;#34; theory, as AI&amp;#39;s rapid trajectory may eventually trivialize both coding and domain-specific skills &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341147&quot; title=&quot;How much pontificating needs to be done before people acknowledge nobody has any idea what to do with AI on an individual level? First being  good developer and learning how to use AI was sufficient, next it was being able to design architecture, then it was “taste” that made all the difference and now being an expert in the domain is the only thing that matters  really. Until AI is basically in a stable, predictable, state of improvement or stagnation, these takes will continue to be pointless…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48340770&quot; title=&quot;“The hard part of writing software has never been the writing.” I’m tired of these endless articles on HN about software engineers trying to reinvent their identity while trying not to lose touch with reality. One way of dealing with LLMs is to deny the skill level of LLMs. Claim they can’t code as well as you. This excuse works to a certain extent but it also fails because not only are their multitudes of cases where the LLM IS intrinsically worse than me… but there are multitudes of cases…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://consumerrights.wiki/w/Microsoft_Office_2019_and_2021_for_Mac_view-only_conversion_(2026)&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft Office 2019 and 2021 for Mac view-only conversion&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (consumerrights.wiki)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341578&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;985 points · 364 comments · by antipurist&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On July 13, 2026, Microsoft Office 2019 and 2021 for Mac will convert to a &amp;#34;view-only&amp;#34; mode due to an expiring license-validation certificate, preventing users from editing or saving files unless they update to supported versions or switch to a subscription. &lt;a href=&quot;https://consumerrights.wiki/w/Microsoft_Office_2019_and_2021_for_Mac_view-only_conversion_(2026)&quot; title=&quot;Title: Microsoft Office 2019 and 2021 for Mac view-only conversion (2026) - Consumer Rights Wiki    URL Source: https://consumerrights.wiki/w/Microsoft_Office_2019_and_2021_for_Mac_view-only_conversion_(2026)    Published Time: 2026-05-31T02:47:32Z    Markdown Content:  From Consumer Rights Wiki    **Microsoft Office 2019 and 2021 for Mac view-only conversion (2026)** is a scheduled remote degradation of perpetually-licensed Microsoft Office software for macOS and iOS, set for July 13, 2026 when a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft’s move to convert perpetual Office licenses to view-only mode is seen by many as a predatory &amp;#34;bait and switch&amp;#34; designed to force users into subscription models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48342486&quot; title=&quot;This is the new way and we need to stop it now. Forget the &amp;#39;is it legal or not&amp;#39; arguments, their lawyers will win. Just get mad and tell them this is wrong. Stop buying their #$@#$ software. Block them. This is what is wrong with cars too. Don&amp;#39;t want to give them real time data on you and your passengers and instead try to disconnect the modem? Well, no car functionality for you even if it doesn&amp;#39;t need it. -get mad- Stop taking it. Microsoft is the enemy and needs to be treated that way. Same…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48342700&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Microsoft is the enemy This made me smile, sadly. I remember when Microsoft was the new darling not many years ago, because of VS Code and WSL and the apparent goodwill about open source. Some people and I, who lived through all of Microsoft, were skeptical and believed that it was only another embrace phase of their EEE pattern. I&amp;#39;m not sure if they are extinguishing something but it turns out that they are squeezing money out of the pockets of their users now.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some speculate the timeline was accelerated to prevent AI labs from using single offline licenses for massive agent workflows, others argue this is simply standard Microsoft behavior unrelated to modern trends &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341797&quot; title=&quot;I believe the urgent deprecation timeline here may be related to ai labs using offline licensed Office in agents as part of workflows and Office integration. Microsoft wants _each_ agent instance to be a separate license[0] There was always a probability that Microsoft were going to funnel offline users into O365 at some point - but I imagined that to take place over months / years not weeks and days. Buying a single license for thousands of agents may have expedited that. It has resulted in…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341937&quot; title=&quot;Is it me or are people too eager to &amp;#39;one track mind&amp;#39; everything into AI? If I had said thirty years ago that Microsoft would remote disable old copies of Office asking you to upgrade, literally no one would be surprised. This is standard MO for Microsoft, even in a world without AI.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters suggest resisting through small claims court, consumer protection laws in regions like Australia, or switching to open-source alternatives like LibreOffice &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341769&quot; title=&quot;I would encourage affected customers to go to small claims court. You’ll probably get a default judgment. Small claims court was created for just this type of issue.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48342332&quot; title=&quot;This change would go against multiple consumer guarantees in Australia where it&amp;#39;s 1) a right to have undisturbed possession of a product 2) products must be fit for the advertised purpose https://www.accc.gov.au/consumers/buying-products-and-servic... Microsoft would be breaking consumer law if the change goes ahead for the perpetual licenses they sold in Australia&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48342539&quot; title=&quot;Been using LibreOffice for years. Everyone should. If we don&amp;#39;t vote with our choices companies like Microsoft will keep pushing the envelope until you have to pay a monthly fee to turn on your own computer. https://www.libreoffice.org/&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://qazinform.com/news/anthropic-surpasses-openai-to-become-worlds-most-valuable-ai-startup&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Anthropic surpasses OpenAI to become most valuable AI startup&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (qazinform.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336233&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;418 points · &lt;strong&gt;469 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by Bolat14&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic has surpassed OpenAI to become the world’s most valuable AI startup, reaching a valuation near $1 trillion following a $65 billion funding round driven by the success of its Claude assistant and new model releases. &lt;a href=&quot;https://qazinform.com/news/anthropic-surpasses-openai-to-become-worlds-most-valuable-ai-startup&quot; title=&quot;Title: Anthropic surpasses OpenAI to become world’s most valuable AI startup    URL Source: https://qazinform.com/news/anthropic-surpasses-openai-to-become-worlds-most-valuable-ai-startup    Published Time: 2026-05-30 13:21:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  13:21, 30 May 2026    Anthropic has become the most valuable artificial intelligence startup in the world, surpassing OpenAI in market valuation. Following a new funding round, the valuation of the developer behind the Claude AI assistant has approached…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether Anthropic’s rise is driven by superior technology or effective marketing and user experience, with some arguing that developers cannot actually distinguish between model outputs in blind tests &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336381&quot; title=&quot;I never want to hear from developers again that they are not susceptible to marketing. I see meet ups specifically about Claude often. Modern tupperware party. A colleague was convinced Claude is better so we played a game. We used the claude code and codex harness and I implemented some prs they needed with gpt5.5 and opus4.7 and asked them to identify which came from which only from the code. Couldn’t tell. Edit: i bet 99% of people here, if presented with a test where i gave 5 models but all…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48337231&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; We used the claude code and codex harness and I implemented some prs they needed with gpt5.5 and opus4.7 and asked them to identify which came from which only from the code. &amp;gt; Couldn’t tell. Why would you expect them to be able to recognize the signature of a model from a pair of PRs? I don’t understand why you think this is a useful test for anything when we have numerous benchmarks that run 100s of tests on models and both GPT-5.5 and Opus-4.8 perform similarly. I have subscriptions to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users maintain that specific models excel at complex optimization or large-scale projects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48337231&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; We used the claude code and codex harness and I implemented some prs they needed with gpt5.5 and opus4.7 and asked them to identify which came from which only from the code. &amp;gt; Couldn’t tell. Why would you expect them to be able to recognize the signature of a model from a pair of PRs? I don’t understand why you think this is a useful test for anything when we have numerous benchmarks that run 100s of tests on models and both GPT-5.5 and Opus-4.8 perform similarly. I have subscriptions to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336294&quot; title=&quot;codex gtp-5.5 is far superior to opus 4.7 working on large projects&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the preference for Claude often stems from a superior &amp;#34;vibe,&amp;#34; better interaction design, or more effective corporate sales strategies compared to OpenAI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336477&quot; title=&quot;This is like saying you gave a Taylor Swift fan sheet music from 1984 and from Michael Jackson’s thriller and they couldn’t tell the difference. I have a strong affinity for Claude Code because of the interaction experience and overall tone / vibe / process. I am 100% willing to believe the code it produces is identical or possibly less good than Codex. I enjoy working with Claude in a way I just don’t get from OpenAI. YMMV, you may feel just the opposite. But it’s a mistake to look at the…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48337171&quot; title=&quot;You&amp;#39;re overestimating the extent to which individual developers have a choice here. My employer signed up for a Claude Code membership, I use Claude Code. I cannot use Codex. Anecdotally I hear of folks with workplace Claude Code subscriptions all the time. I&amp;#39;m not sure I&amp;#39;ve ever heard someone talk about their workplace Codex subscription. Anthropic clearly did a far better job chasing corporate customers while OpenAI was busy chasing consumers with Sora etc.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336525&quot; title=&quot;I can’t tell the difference between code written in vim or vs code but it matters substantially to the person writing the code. There’s stuff beyond just the output that goes into tool choice.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, a significant portion of the community expresses a desire to move away from OpenAI due to a personal distaste for Sam Altman’s leadership and reputation, regardless of whether the underlying models are commoditized &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336904&quot; title=&quot;I think Sam Altman is an asshole and I prefer to spend my money elsewhere. Frontier models being commoditize is inevitable. OpenAI thinks they&amp;#39;re still competing on technology, and not user experience and market reputation otherwise they&amp;#39;d understand the continuous negative PR generated by Altman&amp;#39;s chaos is going to cost them everything.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48337336&quot; title=&quot;How can you say this as if supporting Dario is any better. At the top level of anything there is almost no such thing as a non-asshole. None of them care genuinely about you they just want your money.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336725&quot; title=&quot;OpenAI’s models could be materially better than Anthropic’s and I still wouldn’t use them because I don’t want to support Altman.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336767&quot; title=&quot;Do you think Amodei is different?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/white-house-proposes-new-rules-giving-political-appointees-final-say-on-research-grants/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;WH proposes rules giving political appointees final approval on research grants&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (scientificamerican.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48331511&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;286 points · &lt;strong&gt;596 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by jordanpg&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The White House has proposed new regulations that would grant political appointees final approval over federal research grants, potentially prioritizing presidential policy goals over the traditional scientific peer-review process. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/white-house-proposes-new-rules-giving-political-appointees-final-say-on-research-grants/&quot; title=&quot;Title: White House proposes new rules giving political appointees final approval on research grants    URL Source: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/white-house-proposes-new-rules-giving-political-appointees-final-say-on-research-grants/    Published Time: 2026-05-28T15:30:00-04:00    Markdown Content:  These proposed Office of Management and Budget regulations would render the federal research grant review process opaque    By [Dan…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The proposed rule is viewed by many as a systematic shift toward institutionalized corruption and politicization that will stifle innovation and drive top talent to emigrate &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48335344&quot; title=&quot;More of the same at this point. If you are politically connected, or stay in an narrow lane of approved work, you get your grant. But if you stray from the politically approved path, or appear disloyal to our First Citizen and the Party, then your grant will be canceled. The remaining supporters of the incumbent party like to claim that they aren&amp;#39;t actually doing anything worse than in the past, and if anything they are just cracking down on things that they see as subjectively bad, so it&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48335259&quot; title=&quot;If you want to stay a scientist, you have to emigrate.  The art of continually licking the right asses to keep funding going is not science.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48337338&quot; title=&quot;Besides the brutal impact on those already invested in the American research community, this is one more nail in the coffin when it comes to competing for new talent.  What researcher in their right mind would move their research and their future to the USA to join this clown rodeo? It is unbelievable to watch my country give up its most unfair (and yet mostly positive) advantage -- a nearly free option on the top talent of the entire planet.  Here&amp;#39;s hoping that the increasingly multipolar…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue this &amp;#34;clown rodeo&amp;#34; undermines America&amp;#39;s historical advantage in global research, potentially ceding scientific leadership to other nations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48337338&quot; title=&quot;Besides the brutal impact on those already invested in the American research community, this is one more nail in the coffin when it comes to competing for new talent.  What researcher in their right mind would move their research and their future to the USA to join this clown rodeo? It is unbelievable to watch my country give up its most unfair (and yet mostly positive) advantage -- a nearly free option on the top talent of the entire planet.  Here&amp;#39;s hoping that the increasingly multipolar…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48332662&quot; title=&quot;Well, america had a good run i guess? Hope china can step up and fill the gap.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48335508&quot; title=&quot;It’s sad to watch my country commit suicide. Not only will my compatriots be poorer for it, but the rest of the world will be too.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, some defend the move as a return to constitutional principles, arguing that voters have the right to reclaim control over taxpayer spending if they no longer trust the scientific establishment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48332012&quot; title=&quot;The country runs on the principles of the constitution, not the institutional principles of science. Control over spending of taxpayer funds always must remain within the political system. Voters can always choose to turn over those decisions to scientists they trust. For much of the 20th century, that’s what voters did. But if they don’t trust the priorities of the current scientific establishment, they can also choose to put that control back in the hands of political appointees. The…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48332848&quot; title=&quot;People really need to read their history. When America definitively surpassed the UK in 1880 as the richest country in the world (per capita), it had operated for the previous century under the spoils system: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spoils_system . The notion of &amp;#39;governance by putatively neutral experts&amp;#39; was a progressive reform of the early-to-mid 20th century, which significantly postdates America&amp;#39;s rise to the top. Rolling the government back to 1880-1910--when the modern…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. However, skeptics note that despite political frustrations, the sheer scale of U.S. research funding remains unmatched globally, making emigration a difficult practical choice for many scientists &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48338292&quot; title=&quot;As a Canadian on a hiring committee, it&amp;#39;s fascinating to talk to Americans who hate the political environment but still don&amp;#39;t want to relocate.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48335385&quot; title=&quot;Emigrate where? And why do you assume that the country you&amp;#39;re gonna emigrate to will have the funds necessay to fund the research? US grants are the biggest and most generous in the world. I think the USG spends over $900 Billion every year. Europe spends about 1/10th of that. Other option is China but as a foreigner, you will never get a grant there unless you work for someone else.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openrouter.ai/announcements/series-b&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OpenRouter raises $113M Series B&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (openrouter.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48338660&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;451 points · 246 comments · by freeCandy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenRouter has raised $113 million in Series B funding led by Alphabet’s CapitalG to scale its multi-model AI infrastructure and routing platform for enterprise production workloads. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openrouter.ai/announcements/series-b&quot; title=&quot;Title: OpenRouter Raises $113M Series B | OpenRouter    URL Source: https://openrouter.ai/announcements/series-b    Markdown Content:  Today we&amp;#39;re announcing our $113M Series B, led by [CapitalG(opens in new tab)](https://capitalg.com/) (Alphabet&amp;#39;s independent growth fund), with participation from [NVentures(opens in new tab)](https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/about-nvidia/nventures/) (NVIDIA&amp;#39;s venture capital arm), [ServiceNow(opens in new tab)](https://www.servicenow.com/) Ventures, [MongoDB(opens in…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenRouter is praised as a low-friction tool for experimenting with diverse LLMs through a unified API, offering valuable features like billing caps and transparency into provider cache-hit rates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48338956&quot; title=&quot;It took me quite a while to come round to OpenRouter. Originally I didn&amp;#39;t understand why anyone would put a proxy between them and an LLM, but it actually adds some quite significant value: 1. By far the lowest friction way to support and try out all the models. 2. They offer billing caps! Most model providers still don&amp;#39;t do this [EDIT: maybe they do, see reply comment], but if you&amp;#39;re going to run anything in public it&amp;#39;s very useful to have hard limits so it doesn&amp;#39;t cost you $1m overnight…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48339295&quot; title=&quot;Another neat thing is, they publish hourly caching states for ALL model/provider combinations. I did some research on it to come up with a provider tiers list and found a bunch of open-source 3rd party hosts are simply trash tier https://dirac.run/posts/cache-hit-rates-agents&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users question the 5% surcharge for high-volume agentic workflows and suggest migrating to first-party APIs at scale, others highlight the platform&amp;#39;s utility for developers who lack credit cards or want to avoid managing multiple distinct provider integrations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48339047&quot; title=&quot;Good points. The easy experimentation factor is helpful for development, though I would gently encourage everyone to migrate to the 1st party APIs for pricing at scale. OpenRouter is also a good place to find free LLM access with a catch: You should expect that any inputs and outputs are going into someone&amp;#39;s training database. Clearly anyone who can pay should be using paid models with privacy protections, but the free models have been great for learning and experimenting. Especially for…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48338877&quot; title=&quot;As someone who uses OpenRouter extensively (and wrote an unintentional adjacent PR piece a few days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317294 ), it&amp;#39;s definitely the best way to try out new models without fiddling with each providers distinct APIs which is becoming a recurring concern as of late. That said, I don&amp;#39;t understand the people who use something a full agentic backbone with expensive models like Claude Opus with OpenRouter because that 5% surcharge is meaningful at that level…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite concerns that the company may face obsolescence as cloud giants like AWS integrate similar features, the founders state the $113M raise is intended to build a durable balance sheet and signal long-term stability to large enterprise customers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48340940&quot; title=&quot;Hi HN! OpenRouter co-founder and COO here. Lots of questions about why we raised! First off: We remain founder-led and founder-controlled, and intend on being here for a long time, creating awesome products for builders all over the world. We are basically a bunch of tinkerers who like building things, and try to make stuff that we would like, when building with AI. Since this is about the raise though, happy to share perspective on it. We believe that strong companies should have a strong…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48339799&quot; title=&quot;I love their product and use them myself. But where&amp;#39;s the value proposition for investors? Unless they get purchased by one of the large cloud providers, they will get pushed out of the market sooner or later. What&amp;#39;s the value proposition for the typical AWS startup to go with openrouter, if Amazon offers similar rates with direct integration into all their other offerings? The only reason OpenRouter can exist at the moment is because we are in the wild-west phase of this technology, and lots…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/kristapsdz/openrsync&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Openrsync: An implementation of rsync, by the OpenBSD team&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48334854&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;472 points · 182 comments · by sph&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Openrsync is a BSD-licensed implementation of the rsync protocol developed by the OpenBSD team. It offers a secure, portable alternative to the original GPL-licensed utility, utilizing native security features like `pledge` and `unveil` while maintaining compatibility with modern rsync versions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/kristapsdz/openrsync&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - kristapsdz/openrsync: BSD-licensed implementation of rsync    URL Source: https://github.com/kristapsdz/openrsync    Markdown Content:  ## Introduction    [](https://github.com/kristapsdz/openrsync#introduction)  **This system has been merged into OpenBSD base. If you&amp;#39;d like to contribute to openrsync, please mail your patches to [tech@openbsd.org](mailto:tech@openbsd.org). This repository is simply the OpenBSD version plus some glue for portability.**    This is an implementation of…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the naming and licensing philosophy of Openrsync, noting that the &amp;#34;Open&amp;#34; prefix is a standard convention for OpenBSD projects like OpenSSH &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48335955&quot; title=&quot;Many projects closely associated with OpenBSD start with &amp;#39;open&amp;#39;... openssh, openbgpd, openntpd, opensmtpd etc.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant debate exists over whether the BSD license is &amp;#34;more open&amp;#34; than the GPL; proponents of the BSD license value the lack of restrictions on derivative works, while critics argue the GPL better ensures long-term openness by preventing code from being privatized &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48335873&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s the deal with the name? Openrsync implies to me that it&amp;#39;s an open source alternative to a closed source program. But the original Rsync is GPL? Is this just the pushover license making it &amp;#39;more open&amp;#39;?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48335942&quot; title=&quot;OpenBSD folks would consider the GPL to be less open due to the requirement to apply the GPL to any derivative works.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48335989&quot; title=&quot;And GNU folks would say the GPL is actually the more open choice because it forces the project to stay open. Two different ways of thinking about it I guess... it&amp;#39;s nice to have choices and I don&amp;#39;t think one is more or less &amp;#39;correct&amp;#39;, more a matter of opinion/taste I guess.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336127&quot; title=&quot;Is this not the paradox of tolerance restated in different terms? BSD license is unrestricted, it tolerates taking open source and closing it, thus always being at risk of things closing down. GPL license doesn’t tolerate taking from open source and closing it, thus ensuring things stay open.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Practically, users report that while the tool has improved, it still exhibits minor behavioral discrepancies compared to the original Samba rsync regarding remote file path creation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48338155&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been using openrsync here and there since it was announced and it&amp;#39;s definitely improved over time. I&amp;#39;m looking forward to when I can use it exclusively. The one place in my usage where it doesn&amp;#39;t match Samba rsync is with the following: openrsync --rsync-path=openrsync -av -e ssh /etc/services example.com:/tmp/services I would expect openrsync to create a remote file /tmp/services, but instead it creates /tmp/services/services. Normal directory mirroring as in -av -e ssh /path/to/src/…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ziglang.org/devlog/2026/#2026-05-26&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Zig: Build System Reworked&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ziglang.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48334048&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;358 points · 244 comments · by tosh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Zig build system has been reworked to separate the configuration and execution processes, significantly improving performance by caching serialized build graphs. Additional updates include a new ELF linker supporting fast incremental compilation, Windows Native API integration, and the ongoing transition to a native Zig-based libc implementation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ziglang.org/devlog/2026/#2026-05-26&quot; title=&quot;Title: Devlog ⚡ Zig Programming Language    URL Source: https://ziglang.org/devlog/2026/    Published Time: Sun, 31 May 2026 03:42:37 GMT    Markdown Content:  This page contains a curated list of recent changes to main branch Zig.    This page contains entries for the year 2026. Other years are available in [the Devlog archive page](https://ziglang.org/devlog/).    May 30, 2026    ## [ELF Linker Improvements](https://ziglang.org/devlog/2026/#2026-05-30)    Author: Matthew Lugg    I’ve spent the past few weeks…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users describe Zig as a &amp;#34;fantastic tool language&amp;#34; for tinkering due to its ergonomic design and lack of &amp;#34;hidden gotchas&amp;#34; compared to older systems languages &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48334723&quot; title=&quot;After having used Zig for a couple of months now I am convinced it is a fantastic tool language. You just pick it up to hack some idea together freely. Every time I hit a wall, I find the creators have thought of it already and offers comfort. But nothing gets in your face how to use the programming language &amp;#39;correctly&amp;#39;. For me it is now the go-to &amp;#39;tinker in my garage&amp;#39; language.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48334956&quot; title=&quot;Have you ever thought &amp;#39;Ugh, this bit of Python code is running much slower than I expected on my computer. Wonder if anyone has written a native library for this&amp;#39;? That&amp;#39;s probably the closest use case for someone who matches your description -- a language that is much more ergonomic, much more &amp;#39;modern&amp;#39; feeling (in all the good ways), while still extremely compatible with C. As for the language itself, it&amp;#39;s going to be more verbose than your Python code. Cons: you&amp;#39;ll have to spell out a lot of…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue Python remains superior for rapid prototyping due to its high-level syntax and extensive libraries, proponents suggest Zig excels when performance is critical or when a modern, more predictable alternative to C is required &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48334820&quot; title=&quot;Is it really that good? My go-to &amp;#39;tinker in my garage&amp;#39; language is Python - lightweight syntax that stays out of your face, batteries included, packages for everything that&amp;#39;s not included. What&amp;#39;s Zig&amp;#39;s edge?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48334956&quot; title=&quot;Have you ever thought &amp;#39;Ugh, this bit of Python code is running much slower than I expected on my computer. Wonder if anyone has written a native library for this&amp;#39;? That&amp;#39;s probably the closest use case for someone who matches your description -- a language that is much more ergonomic, much more &amp;#39;modern&amp;#39; feeling (in all the good ways), while still extremely compatible with C. As for the language itself, it&amp;#39;s going to be more verbose than your Python code. Cons: you&amp;#39;ll have to spell out a lot of…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48335014&quot; title=&quot;Rarely. Most tinkering tasks just don&amp;#39;t have enough heavy duty computation in them to as much as strain a modern CPU. And most of the rest are covered by packages like numpy or pytorch. For the rare exceptions, I make a C lib and call into it to get my numbers crunched. I get that Zig is a viable replacement for C there. But I don&amp;#39;t see it replacing Python.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48334863&quot; title=&quot;Zig is low level, so it will certainly not replace your python usage, it is more like a modern C than anything else. There’s a video of a recent interview with Andrew Kelley, if you want to watch it to understand better what Zig is for, it’s on Jetbrains YouTube channel.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Recent updates, particularly version 0.16.0, have been praised for improving compilation times and introducing efficient new I/O mechanisms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48334612&quot; title=&quot;This sounds like great news, Zig&amp;#39;s compilation times are already terrific and this is going to only make them better.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48335050&quot; title=&quot;I just upgraded some code to Zig 0.16.0 and I am actually really happy with the results. It impacted A LOT of things, but the changes were actually very good and seems to have set the language for a bright future, especially with the new IO mechanism which allows supper efficient code that looks good whether it&amp;#39;s implemented single-threaded, multi-threaded or just via an event loop! If you haven&amp;#39;t tried Zig since 0.16.0 was released, I highly recommend having a look. The release notes for this…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a brief, polarized debate regarding the project Bun&amp;#39;s shift toward Rust and its impact on the Zig ecosystem &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48335185&quot; title=&quot;Bun is moving towards rust but does this also help bun&amp;#39;s compilation times? https://ziggit.dev/t/bun-s-zig-fork-got-4x-faster-compilatio...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48335430&quot; title=&quot;bun seems to be committed to slop rust already. so, with their ethic, maybe we should just disassociate them from zig and let them go realize their slop dreams? zig is on its way to improving compilation times in its own pace and does so for the benefit of the project and everyone involved, so what is left to care for about bun by anthropic’s past?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.economist.com/europe/2026/05/28/leos-first-encyclical-attacks-technological-messianism&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Leo&amp;#39;s first encyclical attacks technological messianism&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (economist.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48334710&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;229 points · &lt;strong&gt;298 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by 1vuio0pswjnm7&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In his first encyclical, Pope Leo warns against the unregulated development of artificial intelligence and &amp;#34;technological messianism,&amp;#34; while also addressing multilateral diplomacy, fact-checked journalism, and the outdated nature of &amp;#34;just war&amp;#34; concepts. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.economist.com/europe/2026/05/28/leos-first-encyclical-attacks-technological-messianism&quot; title=&quot;Title: Leo’s first encyclical attacks technological messianism    URL Source: https://www.economist.com/europe/2026/05/28/leos-first-encyclical-attacks-technological-messianism    Published Time: 2026-05-28T12:54:14.139Z    Markdown Content:  # Leo’s first encyclical attacks technological messianism  ![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on a power struggle between technologists, governments, and religious institutions over who should control transformative technologies like AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48335546&quot; title=&quot;I believe the great problem of our age is deciding who controls technology. The technologists who create it believe they should control it, the people who use it are starting to believe they should control it and the governments who write the laws believe they should control it. And now the priests believe they should also play role. So is the next phase of &amp;#39;Democracy&amp;#39; electing who controls technology?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336156&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The technologists who create it believe they should control it I think it goes deeper than this when you listen to them talk.  They truly think society will be re-ordered by this technology... and they should be in control of that re-ordering rather than democratically elected governments.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Some argue that current tech leaders operate with a &amp;#34;feudal&amp;#34; lack of accountability for societal disruption, contrasting modern corporate immunity with historical legal precedents for collateral damage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336918&quot; title=&quot;In England, ca. 1500s common law established the legal precedent that if your cattle broke loose of its pen, wandered into your neighbor&amp;#39;s field and trampled their garden, you were liable for the damage your cattle caused. Meanwhile, 500 years later Uber could disrupt the livery industry with  VC cash that rendered a NY cab&amp;#39;s owner/operator 6-figure financed medalion license worthless, and somehow that wasn&amp;#39;t Uber&amp;#39;s problem. Now AI (set loose in the wild at the AI industry&amp;#39;s strategic choice so…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Meanwhile, critics debate whether the Pope’s call for multilateral regulation is a necessary moral check or a &amp;#34;progressive&amp;#34; gateway to a totalitarian &amp;#34;one-world government&amp;#34; that could stifle progress &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48335693&quot; title=&quot;Somewhat related: Peter Thiel and the Antichrist [1] &amp;gt; Thiel: [...] There’s a risk of nuclear war, there’s a risk of environmental disaster. Maybe something specific, like climate change, although there are lots of other ones we’ve come up with. There’s a risk of bioweapons. You have all the different sci-fi scenarios. Obviously, there are certain types of risks with A.I. &amp;gt; But I always think that if we’re going to have this frame of talking about existential risks, perhaps we should also talk…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336192&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The Pope is pleading for multilateralism and responsible regulation of technology. According to the Economist at least, he doesn&amp;#39;t seem to know what he wants. The encyclical sounds like a grabbag of every progressive meme and worry out there, whether they contradict each other or not. You can&amp;#39;t have both multilateralism and AI regulation (however that&amp;#39;s defined). If you have genuine multilateralism then there will always be some jurisdictions that say they don&amp;#39;t want to regulate and gain a…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48337106&quot; title=&quot;The Second Vatican Council movement has had &amp;#39;popes&amp;#39; that seem to directly attack previous Catholic teaching; I expect this will resolve to the council being rejected as a false council like the &amp;#39;robber council&amp;#39; of Second Council of Ephesus, as well as the papal claimants being declared invalid or &amp;#39;not popes&amp;#39; since that time. The analogy would be like if, since the world cup of soccer is going on, FIFA had a meeting and decided every goal was worth 3 points instead of 1 point. Some people might…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://av2.aomedia.org&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The AV2 Video Standard Has Released (Final v1.0 Specification)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (av2.aomedia.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48340910&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;347 points · 158 comments · by ksec&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Alliance for Open Media has released the final v1.0 specification for AV2, a next-generation video codec designed to provide superior compression efficiency and enhanced support for AR/VR and streaming applications compared to its predecessor, AV1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://av2.aomedia.org&quot; title=&quot;Title: AV2 Specification    URL Source: https://av2.aomedia.org/    Published Time: Sat, 30 May 2026 17:11:30 GMT    Markdown Content:  ## About AV2    **AV2** is the next-generation video coding specification from the Alliance for Open Media (AOMedia). Building on the foundation of AV1, AV2 is engineered to provide superior compression efficiency, enabling high-quality video delivery at significantly lower bitrates. It is optimized for the evolving demands of streaming, broadcasting, and real-time…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The AV2 specification offers a 20-30% efficiency gain over AV1 and introduces significant features like native multi-stream support for VR and alpha channels for transparent video &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48342619&quot; title=&quot;A few things - this is one step in a long, LONG path. AV2 is currently unusable in its current state (the encoder typically runs at around 1fps on good hardware), and likely will remain so til ~2028 when the first av2 hardware accelerated chips start dropping. Even then, I wouldn&amp;#39;t expect AV2 streams to be common til 2030. IMO, if it were just the efficiency gains on the table (which are substantial - ~20-30% over AV1), I&amp;#39;d say that AV2 isn&amp;#39;t worth it. The biggest thing it does add though is…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While the current reference encoder is extremely slow, proponents expect production-ready software encoders to improve performance long before hardware acceleration arrives around 2028–2030 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48342619&quot; title=&quot;A few things - this is one step in a long, LONG path. AV2 is currently unusable in its current state (the encoder typically runs at around 1fps on good hardware), and likely will remain so til ~2028 when the first av2 hardware accelerated chips start dropping. Even then, I wouldn&amp;#39;t expect AV2 streams to be common til 2030. IMO, if it were just the efficiency gains on the table (which are substantial - ~20-30% over AV1), I&amp;#39;d say that AV2 isn&amp;#39;t worth it. The biggest thing it does add though is…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48342703&quot; title=&quot;Based on AV1&amp;#39;s trajectory, hardware encode isn&amp;#39;t necessary (though it is nice). The current encoder is a reference encoder. Now that the spec is finalized, expect significant speed improvements from production encoders (realtime likely won&amp;#39;t happen until we get it in hardware though)&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also highlights AV2&amp;#39;s potential impact on the AVIF image format, which is praised for its HDR and transparency support but currently lags behind JPEG XL in lossless compression &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48342894&quot; title=&quot;What I&amp;#39;m interested in is seeing how this will improve the AVIF image format.  AVIF stomps the competition for low-bitrate still images (where chroma subsampling is used).  For lossless images, not so much.  Lossless JPEG XL and lossless WEBP make lossless AVIF look like a joke.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48343793&quot; title=&quot;AVIF is for sure my favorite image format right now. No other format has the quadfecta of lossless, HDR, transparency, browser support. Plus as you said, for very compressed images it looks amazing. It blows my mind how small AVIF files can be. Also, unlike HEIC and Ultra HDR JPEG, it actually supports HDR natively as part of the file format rather than doing the hacky sidecar gain map trick. I know it doesn&amp;#39;t matter to everyone, but I just love HDR and AVIF is the only format that I feel like…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite concerns over patent litigation from competitors like Dolby, the codec is seen as a vital step for high-quality, low-bitrate communication &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48342838&quot; title=&quot;Congrats! How is the case of fighting off Dolby&amp;#39;s patent racketeering going? They tried to attack Snapchat for using AV1.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48343719&quot; title=&quot;One of the interesting usage of AV1 was specifically for low bitrate calls, and software encoding was perfectly fine, even on mobile. With low enough resolution, framerate and bitrate, you can get a quality stream without significant encoding artifacts compared to any other codec. It is in production right now and has been for a while. The tradeoff CPU / bandwidth is quite advantageous in situations like this. And no, AV1 HW encoders cannot usually be used, they are not designed for a tight…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://pandoc-templates.org/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Pandoc Templates&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (pandoc-templates.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48334515&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;437 points · 58 comments · by ankitg12&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pandoc-templates.org is a curated repository providing a variety of open-source templates to convert Markdown files into professional formats like PDF, HTML, and DOCX. The collection includes specialized layouts for academic papers, résumés, PhD theses, letters, and slide decks compatible with Pandoc. &lt;a href=&quot;https://pandoc-templates.org/&quot; title=&quot;Title: pandoc-templates.org    URL Source: https://pandoc-templates.org/    Published Time: Sat, 30 May 2026 08:50:01 GMT    Markdown Content:  # pandoc-templates.org    [![Image 1: Pandoc Templates](https://pandoc-templates.org/favicon-light.svg)![Image 2: Pandoc Templates](https://pandoc-templates.org/favicon-dark.svg) Pandoc Templates](https://pandoc-templates.org/)  *   Toggle theme      *    Light       *    Dark       *    Auto     Sort By     Search     Formats     - [x] LaTeX - [x] PDF - [x] HTML - [x] DOCX…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pandoc is widely praised as an essential tool for converting Markdown into professional formats, with users leveraging it for everything from novel formatting via GitHub Actions to academic papers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48335359&quot; title=&quot;Pandoc is such an amazing piece of software. I used it to format my novel and made it part of a GitHub action to produce all the formats I required. I wasn&amp;#39;t aware of templates, but some look really sleek. I keep thinking that modern text editors are just flawed and markdown, with all its downsides and limitations, is what 99% is the people need.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336880&quot; title=&quot;I used to use pandoc for my bachelors papers, which needed to be submitted as word documents. I never used templates but had a rather large &amp;#39;one-liner&amp;#39; pandoc command to convert my markdown files. At the time I&amp;#39;d not got round to understanding the yaml front matter etc. I even user Zettlr for a while [0]. I then discovered quarto [1] and this changed everything. Much nicer experience. I used this for my masters papers. I think the tooling around pandoc is what makes it such a good tool. I…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48335386&quot; title=&quot;I am a heavy user of Pandoc. As I write all my text in markdown using Obsidian, but have to create content for the MS Office environment, I use Pandoc to convert my markdown content into ms office formated content. I would be lost had I have to use the Office tools to edit and format my text. So thank you to all the maintainers of Pandoc.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. However, significant friction exists regarding PDF generation and complex layouts, leading some to find the &amp;#34;unintuitive&amp;#34; struggle with LaTeX templates and page breaks more burdensome than returning to traditional WYSIWYG word processors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48335983&quot; title=&quot;Pandoc is an impressive piece of software but I could never quite get PDF generation working nicely with it. Table layouts were often broken, with text overlapping into adjacent fields. Unicode font fallback didn&amp;#39;t work properly, with characters like &amp;#39;→&amp;#39; being silently dropped because they didn&amp;#39;t exist in the main font. Having predictable control of page breaks, to avoid situations where header text didn&amp;#39;t stick to the following paragraph and instead had header and paragraph text split over a…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336878&quot; title=&quot;https://typst.app/&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that modern editors are flawed and Markdown suffices for most needs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48335359&quot; title=&quot;Pandoc is such an amazing piece of software. I used it to format my novel and made it part of a GitHub action to produce all the formats I required. I wasn&amp;#39;t aware of templates, but some look really sleek. I keep thinking that modern text editors are just flawed and markdown, with all its downsides and limitations, is what 99% is the people need.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336065&quot; title=&quot;For most of the short simple documents I create, I don&amp;#39;t want to redo the formating for every document.  Simply writing it in something simple like Markdown ( possibly a markdown wysiwig editor) and having my software automatically apply appropriate standard formats to it is ideal.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that systematic use of styles in software like LibreOffice or Word remains superior for those who require visual control and predictable output &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48335683&quot; title=&quot;For the short, simple documents that most people make, a versioned, wysiwyg word processor is going to beat everything else. I mean, they don&amp;#39;t want to think about building the output, never mind controlling the process.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336259&quot; title=&quot;Right, most people don&amp;#39;t want to do that, they want the burden of applying styles to the couple headings or whatever. Unfortunately, most people don&amp;#39;t use paragraph styles, but if you do, it&amp;#39;s a couple clicks.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336382&quot; title=&quot;Agreed. There is actually a lot better control in openoffice / libreoffice than most people know. You just have to set up your styles and be systematic about (virtually) never using direct formatting, instead always applying a pre-configured style. There is a distinct value in seeing your final product as you work, when the final product is visual.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-to-acquire-ookla-to-strengthen-network-intelligence-and-experience-with-data-and-ai-for-enterprises&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Accenture to acquire Ookla&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (newsroom.accenture.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48337987&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;316 points · 174 comments · by Garbage&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Accenture has agreed to acquire Ookla, the company behind Speedtest and Downdetector, in a $1.2 billion deal aimed at enhancing its network intelligence and AI capabilities for enterprise clients. &lt;a href=&quot;https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/2026/accenture-to-acquire-ookla-to-strengthen-network-intelligence-and-experience-with-data-and-ai-for-enterprises&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.theverge.com&amp;amp;#x2F;tech&amp;amp;#x2F;889234&amp;amp;#x2F;downdetector-ookla-speedtest-sold-accenture&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.theverge.com&amp;amp;#x2F;tech&amp;amp;#x2F;889234&amp;amp;#x2F;downdetector-ookla-spee...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;FR8ND&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;FR8ND&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Accenture’s acquisition of Ookla is viewed as a strategic move to pivot toward high-value data sales as its core consulting business faces AI-driven disruption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48339253&quot; title=&quot;I am not sure why this old news is surfacing here today but I can give my 2 cents, since I sold speedchecker.com last year and were directly competing with Ookla. The main business is selling the data. You use Speedtest.net to troubleshoot your connection but metrics captured with the test alongside location data give telcos invaluable insights on where they should improve their networks. Telcos pay 6 figures annually for this data and we have a few hundreds of of those big MNOs globally. This…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48338659&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;By integrating Ookla’s data products, including Speedtest®, Downdetector®, Ekahau®, and RootMetrics®, Accenture will help Communications Service Providers (CSPs), hyperscalers, and enterprises optimize the mission-critical Wi-Fi and 5G networks that power their digital core. [...] Ookla’s data platform is anchored by more than 250 million consumer-initiated tests per month, complemented by controlled drive, walk, and embedded testing options&amp;#39;[1] [1]…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While commenters agree the underlying technology is simple enough to replicate in a weekend, they emphasize that the true value lies in Ookla’s massive user base, enterprise sales relationships, and &amp;#34;network effect&amp;#34; that forces ISPs to treat their metrics as the industry standard &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48339253&quot; title=&quot;I am not sure why this old news is surfacing here today but I can give my 2 cents, since I sold speedchecker.com last year and were directly competing with Ookla. The main business is selling the data. You use Speedtest.net to troubleshoot your connection but metrics captured with the test alongside location data give telcos invaluable insights on where they should improve their networks. Telcos pay 6 figures annually for this data and we have a few hundreds of of those big MNOs globally. This…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48339019&quot; title=&quot;Of course they are not complex. They do have a network effect though. If you go to your local ISP and say “hey, my 500mbps plan is only doing 100mbps on Speedtest.net”, they’ll “fix it” (usually by working with Ookla to put an edge endpoint on their network) If you tell the “hey frankyspeeddetect.com isn’t doing my 500mbps” they’ll tell you to it’s an issue with that random website. ISPs and services reach out to Ookla to onboard with them because they have a network effect/mindshare of…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341540&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; but it took me 18 years to grow the user base , figure out entreprise sales strategy and exit. The audience here has never wanted to admit that the codebase doesn&amp;#39;t really matter. Now that codebases can be created in a weekend, people are opening their eyes to this sentiment - the hard part is the sales, the code is easy.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users remain skeptical of the business model, suggesting that ISPs may prioritize Speedtest traffic to inflate results &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48339272&quot; title=&quot;When I used a major cable ISP, often my connection seemed slow, so I&amp;#39;d go to speedtest.com. The speedtest would be fine... and then I would magically have faster network performance again. It happened enough times that I&amp;#39;m suspicious the ISP had some way to detect if you run a speedtest, and then prioritized traffic to that customer.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt; or that open-source and government-run alternatives could eventually undermine their market dominance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48338786&quot; title=&quot;may i suggest nettfart.no by the norwegian government as an alternative ? at least the name is fun&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48340627&quot; title=&quot;All it takes to defeat the business model is https://openspeedtest.com/&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://gptzero.me/investigations/ey&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;EY Canada published a cybersecurity report and most citations were hallucinated&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (gptzero.me)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48339580&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;317 points · 139 comments · by smartmic&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An investigation by GPTZero revealed that a 2025 EY Canada cybersecurity report contains numerous hallucinated citations, fake statistics, and AI-generated text. The report’s reliance on &amp;#34;vibe citing&amp;#34; resulted in broken URLs and non-existent references, potentially poisoning the data used by human researchers and AI tools. &lt;a href=&quot;https://gptzero.me/investigations/ey&quot; title=&quot;Investigation: Hallucinations in Ernst &amp;amp; Young Report on Loyalty Fraud | GPTZero    An investigation into fabricated citations and broken references in EY&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;Points of Attack&amp;#39; cybersecurity report on loyalty system fraud.    GPTZeroInvestigations·Exclusive    # Chasing the Hallucinations    Ernst &amp;amp; Young (EY) Canada published a cybersecurity report on loyalty program safeguards. We chased down every citation. Most were hallucinated.    View Investigation    [Investigations](/news/tag/investigations)    [![Om…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The publication of hallucinated citations by EY Canada is seen as a symptom of &amp;#34;Big Four&amp;#34; firms prioritizing efficiency and cost-cutting over quality, often replacing experienced staff with AI or junior employees &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48340002&quot; title=&quot;The Big Four have become a shadow of their former selves. They have become so risk averse that their advice is already incredibly generic and non-actionable. I think their audit work is in a downwards spiral. Audit has become so competitive that they are struggling to find ways to make it cheaper. They have become slaves to reducing the hours booked,  and the rate of those hours. To do this they substitute less experienced people all the time. You used to be able to chat with your partner about…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48339827&quot; title=&quot;EY has been quietly laying people off for the last year solid. It&amp;#39;s unsurprising that trying to do more with less results in lower quality.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters argue that vetting AI output is frequently more time-consuming than manual creation, yet experts are often too overwhelmed or demoralized to perform necessary reviews &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48339777&quot; title=&quot;The problem we&amp;#39;re seeing across many professions is AI output is not getting vetted by knowledgeable people, whether it&amp;#39;s an experienced analyst, senior engineer, expert attorney, or the resident physician. At best they skim, at worst they don&amp;#39;t even see it at all before it&amp;#39;s published, pushed to production, distributed to clients, or submitted to the court. In many cases the skills are available in house to do the necessary vetting, but these people are already overwhelmed with their existing…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48340086&quot; title=&quot;As an attorney, I feel like vetting AI output takes longer than just doing it from scratch, let alone versus just using a traditional form. With AI, I have to read through everything, often explain why it&amp;#39;s wrong, and then rewrite everything anyways. I mean, I get way more billables, but I think it&amp;#39;s symptomatic of how AI loses its advantage of being quick and accessible to those who don&amp;#39;t understand the subject matter.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48340017&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; AI output is not getting vetted by knowledgeable people You mean the people they fired and demoralized? One of the things that &amp;#39;great [wo]men&amp;#39; like about &amp;#39;vibe-coding&amp;#39; (and that includes blindly producing non-code product), is that they, and they alone can now do what used to require the painful process of &amp;#39;passing it to context experts.&amp;#39; Now, the LLM is a &amp;#39;built-in context expert,&amp;#39; and they don&amp;#39;t need to vet the output anymore.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest using LLMs to fact-check each other, others contend that the real issue is a corporate culture that demands &amp;#34;do-nothing&amp;#34; reports for box-ticking exercises where the content is never intended to be read &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48339866&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t quite get it why they can&amp;#39;t take another LLM and vet the output of the first with the second one. Surely they would not have the same hallucinations and would be able to detect hallucinations of the earlier LLM. Maybe it would cost too much in terms of tokens? I don&amp;#39;t know but I would expect it to be realtively easy for an LLM to detect &amp;#39;hallucinations&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48340186&quot; title=&quot;The interesting thing is... There may be a lot of demand for do-nothing services. A lot of corporate work is just do-nothing box-ticking. Boss: get me a report about X, so I can give that report to my boss who won&amp;#39;t read it. You: E&amp;amp;Y, please get me a report.  Here&amp;#39;s $200k.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://shantellsans.com/process&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Shantell Sans (2023)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (shantellsans.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341062&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;390 points · 44 comments · by aleda145&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Artist Shantell Martin and designer Stephen Nixon have released Shantell Sans, a free, open-source variable font based on Martin’s handwriting designed to be friendly, legible, and accessible for dyslexic readers. The typeface supports over 380 languages and features experimental axes for &amp;#34;bounce&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;informality&amp;#34; to create energetic, animated styles. &lt;a href=&quot;https://shantellsans.com/process&quot; title=&quot;Title: Shantell Sans → A font for you    URL Source: https://shantellsans.com/process    Published Time: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 23:35:12 GMT    Markdown Content:  ## The Story of Shantell Sans    _Shantell Sans mixes variable axes for Weight, Italic, Informality, and Bounce to deliver a wide array of font styles, from friendly, readable, everyday typographic workhorses to striking, high-energy, experimental styles meant especially for animation._    _This is the story behind its inspiration and creation._    ##…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are highly impressed by Shantell Sans’ &amp;#34;formality&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;bounce&amp;#34; sliders, viewing them as a creative peak for variable font technology and a modern vindication of Metafont &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48342326&quot; title=&quot;the formality slider (play with it at the google fonts page linked in the article[0]) is genuinely one of the coolest uses of a variable font axis i&amp;#39;ve seen in recent memory. it feels like we&amp;#39;re witnessing the slow and steady vindication of metafont. [0] https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Shantell+Sans&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48342874&quot; title=&quot;That’s the coolest thing!And “bounce” slider. What a time to be alive…   I wonder if there are more fonts like that with special adjustments.    Still waiting for technology to allow handwritten font with true randomness.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48344441&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not familiar with Metafont -- is this what you&amp;#39;re referencing? https://ctan.org/pkg/metafont?lang=en&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While the font received praise for its accessibility—specifically from a user with dyslexia &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48342157&quot; title=&quot;Dyslexic daughter gave a big thumbs up, she definitely prefers this to Roboto in the example.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;—commenters noted that true handwritten realism is still hindered by the lack of randomized glyph variations within sentences &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48343925&quot; title=&quot;The font is great. What I miss is a step forward in technology: variable glyphs. The feeling of reading a handwritten text is lost when the letters have always the same shape. If it were possible to add 5-6 little variations for each letter and alternate them randomly, it would be awesome.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48344848&quot; title=&quot;Wait, does more informality mean that individual glyphs for the same character can be different even within the same sentence?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48345077&quot; title=&quot;Unfortunately not, that would require a random axis, or a contextual swapping based on adjacent letterforms. Prof. Hermann Zapf&amp;#39;s eponymous Zapfino has the latter --- I even included an animation of it in my paper on it: http://ftp.tug.org/TUGboat/tb24-2/tb77adams.pdf&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Some participants expressed a desire for a monospaced version &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48342372&quot; title=&quot;Is it weird that I want a mono version if this? Looks really great, really well designed.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, while others recommended similar fonts like Recursive and Codelia for their extensive variable axes and coding-friendly designs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48343981&quot; title=&quot;One of my favourite fonts is Recursive[0]. It has even more variable axes than Shantell Sans: apart from the usual weight and slant it also has a &amp;#39;Casual&amp;#39; axis as well as &amp;#39;Monospace&amp;#39; (which is continuous from fully proportional to fully monospace). I use Recursive as my terminal font, and in many other places. You can also play with it on Google Fonts[1]. [0]: https://www.recursive.design/ [1]: https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Recursive&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48342915&quot; title=&quot;I use and love this. Not quite the same, and not free, but I think it&amp;#39;s beautifully made. https://tosche.net/fonts/codelia&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://musings.martyn.berlin/to-have-a-moral-stance-on-ai-is-to-be-an-outcast-and-it-sucks&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;To have a moral stance on AI is to be an outcast, and it sucks&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (musings.martyn.berlin)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48337676&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;129 points · &lt;strong&gt;279 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by mooreds&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author expresses deep social and professional isolation due to a staunch moral opposition to generative AI, citing concerns over environmental impact, labor exploitation, and misinformation while vowing to distance themselves from those who promote or casually use the technology. &lt;a href=&quot;https://musings.martyn.berlin/to-have-a-moral-stance-on-ai-is-to-be-an-outcast-and-it-sucks&quot; title=&quot;Title: To have a moral stance on AI is to be an outcast, and it sucks.    URL Source: https://musings.martyn.berlin/to-have-a-moral-stance-on-ai-is-to-be-an-outcast-and-it-sucks    Published Time: 2026-04-28T19:45:34Z    Markdown Content:  I know the technology, I understand what it&amp;#39;s doing and I know the impact, so I am vehemently anti-AI.    I do not believe any positive outcome is possible with this form of AI that is worth the harms that it has already done and is continuing to do. Nor do I believe…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate over the morality of AI is deeply polarized, with some users feeling socially ostracized for holding nuanced or positive views &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48338160&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s funny, I have the opposite experience of everyone around me hating AI. I&amp;#39;m not aggressively pro-AI around them at all but you aren&amp;#39;t allowed to have any positive or nuanced opinion of the tech. I&amp;#39;m used to it though, I&amp;#39;ve been excited by the concept of AI since reading about Turing and such as a child 20 years ago. The idea has always been met with negativity, IMO because people want to feel that they have a part of themselves that is beyond nature and has a &amp;#39;special&amp;#39; place in the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48338331&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; you aren&amp;#39;t allowed to have any positive or nuanced opinion of the tech. I&amp;#39;m finding this isn&amp;#39;t unique to AI, it&amp;#39;s as if our entire society has become black and white, overly tribal. There&amp;#39;s little room for shades of gray now. Look at the issue of public drug use by the unhoused in PNW cities, as an example. If you state any opinion other than silent acceptance of the issue, you get called a far-right nutjob. Trying to stand up for your right to a safe public space brands you as evil. There&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, while others argue that a truly principled moral stance necessitates a refusal to tolerate what one perceives as evil &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48338251&quot; title=&quot;This is like a vegan refusing to be around, let alone eat with, meateaters. As vegans and vegetarians (and decades earlier, non-smokers) have shown, you can have a principled stance on something without forcing that stance on others. Yes, it sucks. Yes, your impact will be smaller. But it’s a lot easier to maintain than to break off contact with a friend who dares ask ChatGPT a question.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48338532&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; As vegans and vegetarians (and decades earlier, non-smokers) have shown, you can have a principled stance on something without forcing that stance on others. If you truly believe something is evil, i think that is difficult. Like imagine if someone said, i believe murder is wrong but i dont want to force that on others. Or, i dont really like slavery but that&amp;#39;s just me and others should be slave owners if they feel that is right. Obviously there is a spectrum of moral ills, and not all are…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics contend that the current backlash from the tech class is &amp;#34;childishly performative,&amp;#34; noting that these same individuals previously profited from similar cycles of automation and exploitation that are only now threatening their own livelihoods &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48338182&quot; title=&quot;Controversial take: It&amp;#39;s weird to see people in tech taking this stance. They&amp;#39;ve been riding the same wave of exploiting the average person through economies of scale for the last 20+ years, but now that it affects them, it&amp;#39;s suddenly catastrophic. You dont get to benefit from the expansion of companies like Uber, airbnb or meta, then pretend like you were always focused on the success of the average person. You didn&amp;#39;t care when you could get ahead, don&amp;#39;t pretend like you care now. It&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48338730&quot; title=&quot;Economies of scale is how society lowers the cost of meeting the demand for things people want. Uber, Airbnb, and Meta have negative externalities that have gone “unpriced” in the market because our policy makers are incompetent. But at large, they’ve net benefitted society, many more times over than they’ve hurt anyone whose job was displaced from the cycle of innovation and those individuals have found new jobs, or adapted to compete (taxis making a comeback, except they’re not fucking…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, there is significant disillusionment regarding the &amp;#34;AI&amp;#34; label itself, as many feel the technology has pivoted from the aspirational concepts of science fiction toward a reality of corporate rent-seeking and environmental concerns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48338207&quot; title=&quot;Part of the hate surrounding AI is that it is being sold as AI, but it really, really isn&amp;#39;t the AI of the kind you read as a child 20 years ago.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48338084&quot; title=&quot;First ever argument being &amp;#39;People do not realise how much of a toll it takes on you if you actually care about the environment&amp;#39; GUYS PLEASE The impact of ai on the enviroment is one of the dumbest psyops in history, how can you claim to know start with that after claiming you know the technology and what it is doing? There are hundreds of reasons to hate ai but this is just NOT it&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48338258&quot; title=&quot;When I was a kid, “AI” was quake 2 bots, starcraft pathfinding algorithms, and chessbot personalities. I dont understand why the old definition of AI keeps being retconned.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48338319&quot; title=&quot;Yes. We were supposed to have the Star Trek post-scarcity economy, whereas what we&amp;#39;re getting is layoffs, rent-seeking and wealth extraction at every turn, complete loss of personal privacy, everything getting more expensive, and no hope for the future. Meanwhile I&amp;#39;m still washing and folding my clothes every week.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jackmaguire.org/blog/ai-job-grief/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI job grief: A psychological crisis hitting tech workers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jackmaguire.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336760&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;191 points · 187 comments · by LilBytes&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AI-driven displacement is fueling a psychological crisis of &amp;#34;career grief&amp;#34; among tech workers, who face a loss of professional identity and purpose that traditional clinical frameworks and corporate policies are currently failing to address. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jackmaguire.org/blog/ai-job-grief/&quot; title=&quot;Title: AI Job Grief: The Unnamed Psychological Crisis Hitting Tech Workers    URL Source: https://jackmaguire.org/blog/ai-job-grief/    Published Time: 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  May 29, 2026    * * *    In the summer of 2025, an Epic Games layoff cut a worker who was a terminally ill father. According to the most-discussed account of the episode, his family lost his life insurance along with the job. The Reddit thread documenting it reached 36,687 upvotes on…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on &amp;#34;Artificial Intelligence Replacement Dysfunction&amp;#34; (AIRD), a proposed psychological construct describing the bereavement felt when AI threatens a professional identity that has become inseparable from the self &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336761&quot; title=&quot;Quotes from the article: &amp;#39;Work as Identity: The Foundation&amp;#39; Knowledge workers hold a different relationship to their labor than manufacturing workers did. For a cognitive professional, expertise is not only an activity. It is a large part of the self. A data scientist who has spent a decade building statistical judgment does not experience that judgment as a detachable tool. It is closer to a personality trait. When automation threatens the work, it reaches past the income and touches the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341294&quot; title=&quot;I’m close to despondent about how my job has changed. If the next 15 years of my life is just waiting on LLMs, I don’t think I can do it.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that society should transition away from job-centric identities toward a model of shared AI-produced value &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48337511&quot; title=&quot;I am probably different to most people, but I always have trouble understanding why people want to have jobs so much. The obvious and direct answer immediately of course is &amp;#39;to be able to pay the bills&amp;#39;. But of course if we automated those jobs with AI, we could direct AI produced value into universal basic income so people wouldn&amp;#39;t lose their income. Then the concern is of course, that the owners will not share the produced value. But the answer to that in my view is that we should rather do…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others criticize the source article itself as &amp;#34;AI slop&amp;#34; that lacks genuine human insight &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48337516&quot; title=&quot;How utterly pointless. AI slop posing as “commentary” on the AI crisis.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48337618&quot; title=&quot;If someone had written it. It&amp;#39;s well curated slop, but it&amp;#39;s still slop. Consider this bit: &amp;gt; A profession does not need to be eliminated to be mourned. It is enough for its center to fall out, leaving the people who built careers in that center with credentials that no longer map to a stable role. When AI threatens the work, it threatens the self, which is why the response looks less like ordinary job-loss fear and more like a form of bereavement. I&amp;#39;m certain that section was mostly constructed…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable disagreements also arise regarding the article&amp;#39;s claim that manual laborers do not identify with their work as deeply as knowledge workers do &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336761&quot; title=&quot;Quotes from the article: &amp;#39;Work as Identity: The Foundation&amp;#39; Knowledge workers hold a different relationship to their labor than manufacturing workers did. For a cognitive professional, expertise is not only an activity. It is a large part of the self. A data scientist who has spent a decade building statistical judgment does not experience that judgment as a detachable tool. It is closer to a personality trait. When automation threatens the work, it reaches past the income and touches the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48337440&quot; title=&quot;The idea that skilled people who work with their hands don&amp;#39;t identify with their work is laughable.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lloydslist.com/LL1157327/Hormuz-crisis-side-effect-a-sharp-rise-in-container-shipping-rates&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hormuz crisis side effect: a sharp rise in container shipping rates&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lloydslist.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48339180&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;198 points · 179 comments · by mooreds&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Container shipping rates have surged significantly as a direct consequence of the ongoing crisis in the Strait of Hormuz. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lloydslist.com/LL1157327/Hormuz-crisis-side-effect-a-sharp-rise-in-container-shipping-rates&quot; title=&quot;Title: Just a moment...    URL Source: https://www.lloydslist.com/LL1157327/Hormuz-crisis-side-effect-a-sharp-rise-in-container-shipping-rates    Warning: Target URL returned error 403: Forbidden  Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.    Markdown Content:  Enable JavaScript and cookies to continue&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights how geopolitical instability in the Strait of Hormuz triggers cascading second-order effects, such as rising consumer costs for goods like paint and potential famines in the developing world due to fertilizer shortages &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48339494&quot; title=&quot;Man, the older I get, the more I think that second and third and fourth order effects are way more important than first order effects.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48340400&quot; title=&quot;There’s probably going to be a famine or famines due to lack of, and expense, of fertilizer resulting in less food for the developing world.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48339667&quot; title=&quot;Anyone tried to buy paint recently? $611 for 2x 5 gallon buckets just to do my garage.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users criticize the global failure to build redundancy for a known chokepoint controlled by an adversarial actor, others debate whether economic theory sufficiently accounts for these externalities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48339568&quot; title=&quot;Externalities always felt glossed over in economics. So yes this business will ruin the river for everyone but please direct your attention to this chart and look at all that producer surplus!&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48340651&quot; title=&quot;The most surprising thing is that the whole world somehow has built dependency on Hormuz which has been known for decades that it is controlled by Iran, an adversarial actor to the west. Nobody ever thinks of, you know, building redundancy for Hormuz?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48339927&quot; title=&quot;One of my favorite readings from undergrad and grad school was &amp;#39;The Problem of Social Costs&amp;#39; by R. Coase. I&amp;#39;m sorry you think externalities are glossed over by economics, but Im excited to tell you that this is certainly not the case. Coase won the Nobel Prize in economics in large part for his work on externalities. They don&amp;#39;t hand out Nobel prizes for glossed over topics. It&amp;#39;s definitely worth a read of you wish economics paid more attention to externalities:…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, some participants attribute the crisis to current political leadership and administrative shifts, arguing that these actions function as a &amp;#34;racketeering scheme&amp;#34; that burdens the middle class &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48339700&quot; title=&quot;Can&amp;#39;t someone take all possessions of Trump, Hegseth etc... and redistribute this to middle and lower class folks? I fail to see why I have to pay for increasing prices due to the actions of those guys. This is literally a racketeering scheme for milking us via increase of prices. A few get very rich, just as Smedley Butler pointed out many decades ago - even he would be shocked at the level of milking going on here.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48339707&quot; title=&quot;Trump flip-flops numerous times per day. I am beginning to think that &amp;#39;The Art of the Deal&amp;#39; was also always fake - he is unable to make a deal. Everyone sees this now.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48340486&quot; title=&quot;Add to that the USAID shutdown and other impacts to humanitarian relief caused by the DOGE team. It’s all coming together for a really nightmarish time for developing countries&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://s-macke.github.io/VoxelSpace/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Voxel Space (2017)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (s-macke.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336564&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;300 points · 68 comments · by davikr&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article explains the Voxel Space engine, a 2.5D rendering technique popularized by the 1992 game *Comanche* to create detailed terrain using height and color maps without a GPU. &lt;a href=&quot;https://s-macke.github.io/VoxelSpace/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Voxel Space    URL Source: https://s-macke.github.io/VoxelSpace/    Published Time: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 19:26:03 GMT    Markdown Content:  ## [VoxelSpace](https://s-macke.github.io/VoxelSpace/)    ![Image 1: web demonstration](https://s-macke.github.io/VoxelSpace/images/webdemo.gif)    ## **[Web Demo of the Voxel Space Engine](https://s-macke.github.io/VoxelSpace/VoxelSpace.html)**    ## History[](https://s-macke.github.io/VoxelSpace/#history)    Let us go back to the year 1992. The CPUs were 1000 times…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether the &amp;#34;Voxel Space&amp;#34; engine truly utilizes voxels, with some arguing it is merely a height map of prisms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48337375&quot; title=&quot;Technically this is not related to voxels (&amp;#39;volumetric pixels&amp;#39;, so to say), which split the 3D space equally along all three axes. This is just a height map, a set of prisms, not entirely unlike a Doom map. Every prism has a regular fixed-size square base. For 1992, this was mind-boggling though.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48338448&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s kind of weird to call them &amp;#39;columns of voxels&amp;#39; when the columns can&amp;#39;t have gaps and the &amp;#39;voxels&amp;#39; below the topmost are ignored completely. Which is to say, they&amp;#39;re just columns...which is (definitionally) just a height map. In fact, an octree for this approach would be _meaningfully worse_ because finding &amp;#39;the topmost voxel&amp;#39; in each column is O(logn)—or maybe worse?—versus O(1) for a height map. With no benefits, because you never look at any other voxels.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt; while others contend that height maps are simply a specific, restricted representation of voxel data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48338241&quot; title=&quot;No? Each pixel on a height map corresponds to a column of voxels of the specified height. You could represent the same height data with a fully general octree and it would look exactly the same.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48339601&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s kind of weird to call them &amp;#39;columns of voxels&amp;#39; when the columns can&amp;#39;t have gaps No, it&amp;#39;s not weird. The columns don&amp;#39;t have gaps because they are columns represented by a height map, which can&amp;#39;t display arbitrary voxel geometry (unlike octrees), but that doesn&amp;#39;t mean they can&amp;#39;t display voxel geometry at all. &amp;gt; Which is to say, they&amp;#39;re just columns...which is (definitionally) just a height map. Yes. A height map is representing voxel data without overhangs. &amp;gt; In fact, an octree for this…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical debate focuses on rendering efficiency, specifically whether the engine used a &amp;#34;painter&amp;#39;s algorithm&amp;#34; or a front-to-back approach to eliminate overdraw &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48337316&quot; title=&quot;[Edit] ah ok they clarify later as a performance enhancement. I think it was pretty integral to the algorithm, but ok. Wait why do they say painter&amp;#39;s algorithm. Comanche and other such voxel terrain engines went front to back and never had overdraw.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336871&quot; title=&quot;If you render columns instead of rows you can render near-to-far without a Y-buffer and with zero overdraw. :)&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48337360&quot; title=&quot;Reverse painters algorithm is still painters algorithm. You trade off the cost of a full screen clear before the frame, in return for eliminating overdraw&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Users also noted that while modern data structures like octrees could represent the same geometry, they would be less efficient for this specific application than the original height map method &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48338448&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s kind of weird to call them &amp;#39;columns of voxels&amp;#39; when the columns can&amp;#39;t have gaps and the &amp;#39;voxels&amp;#39; below the topmost are ignored completely. Which is to say, they&amp;#39;re just columns...which is (definitionally) just a height map. In fact, an octree for this approach would be _meaningfully worse_ because finding &amp;#39;the topmost voxel&amp;#39; in each column is O(logn)—or maybe worse?—versus O(1) for a height map. With no benefits, because you never look at any other voxels.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48339601&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s kind of weird to call them &amp;#39;columns of voxels&amp;#39; when the columns can&amp;#39;t have gaps No, it&amp;#39;s not weird. The columns don&amp;#39;t have gaps because they are columns represented by a height map, which can&amp;#39;t display arbitrary voxel geometry (unlike octrees), but that doesn&amp;#39;t mean they can&amp;#39;t display voxel geometry at all. &amp;gt; Which is to say, they&amp;#39;re just columns...which is (definitionally) just a height map. Yes. A height map is representing voxel data without overhangs. &amp;gt; In fact, an octree for this…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/corporate-america-is-starting-to-ration-ai-as-cost-skyrockets-1eb99d7a&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Corporate America Is Starting to Ration AI as Cost Skyrockets&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (wsj.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48335388&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;181 points · 171 comments · by 1vuio0pswjnm7&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To manage soaring expenses and ensure a return on investment, many U.S. companies are beginning to ration employee access to generative AI tools and prioritize specific high-value use cases. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/corporate-america-is-starting-to-ration-ai-as-cost-skyrockets-1eb99d7a&quot; title=&quot;Title: wsj.com    URL Source: https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/corporate-america-is-starting-to-ration-ai-as-cost-skyrockets-1eb99d7a    Warning: Target URL returned error 401: Unauthorized  Warning: This page maybe requiring CAPTCHA, please make sure you are authorized to access this page.    Markdown Content:&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Corporate leadership is criticized for blindly following AI hype cycles without understanding the technology, leading to an abrupt shift from demanding high usage to rationing access as costs skyrocket &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336158&quot; title=&quot;The abrupt swing in many non-technology company IT departments from &amp;#39;hey developer, you aren&amp;#39;t using enough tokens&amp;#39; to this is just too funny. And I&amp;#39;m seeing almost no self-awareness from leaders.  They are making decisions about things that they just don&amp;#39;t understand. And are completely unworried about it.  Just blindly following whatever the news cycle is about AI.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336193&quot; title=&quot;The closer people live to the consequences of their decisions the more rational they become. Until leaders(and I use that term loosely) are held accountable, the insanity will continue.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336655&quot; title=&quot;Perhaps, but the change you get (if any) is most likely to be what you push for and reward/punish. It&amp;#39;s irrational to push for tokenmaxxing (literally &amp;#39;please increase our AI spending&amp;#39;) and not expect that this is the result you are going to get. You won&amp;#39;t get productivity increase, since that is not what you are pushing for - you will get token usage maximization (engineers running inane agentic tasks against your code base to increase usage, using company paid AI for their side projects, etc,…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that hardware efficiencies will eventually drop costs by 99%, others point out that current prices for hardware and open-weights models are actually trending upward &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336188&quot; title=&quot;The actual cost is going to drop 99% in ~4 years. How much that makes it into enterprise pricing is TBD, since none of the hyper scalers are making money yet of selling AI inference. Almost all businesses are ahead of the gun.  For most of their use cases, AI is either not yet good enough on its own, or good enough but too expensive. No one wants to get left behind, so everyone&amp;#39;s trying to get onto it now, even though it&amp;#39;s not ready for what most enterprises want to do with it. It&amp;#39;s easy for…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336237&quot; title=&quot;Prices have been very obviously trending up, not down. Even open weights models are becoming more expensive with every release. Computer hardware is ballooning in price.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant point of contention is whether AI is being misused for recurrent tasks that should be automated with code rather than expensive inference &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48335516&quot; title=&quot;In my opinion, the problem is not even the cost. The problem is that people are using AI for running recurrent stuff instead of writing code to automate it. For example. Imagine that you are comparing two documents (let&amp;#39;s assume diff doesn&amp;#39;t exist). You could ask an AI to compare the differences from you or you could use AI to write a tool to do it. For whatever reason, people are starting to go with the former not realizing that now they basically have to pay to compare documents.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, skeptics argue that AI has yet to produce significant revenue or impressive end-user products beyond simple wrappers, though others suggest its true value lies in enabling non-developers to build bespoke internal tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48335795&quot; title=&quot;AI is overhyped. I have yet to see an end user product that in itself isnt a wrapper around LLMs that is impressive created by LLM assistance. I have also yet to see dramatic increases of revenue of companies using LLMs that don&amp;#39;t involve selling things in its supply chain. Is it a nice affordance? Sure. 1T capex good? No. If it was so good I would expect to see 2005-2015 advancements yearly. Meanwhile China is blowing past the world with real improvements in the real world- solar, EVs, etc.…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48336403&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I have yet to see an end user product that in itself isnt a wrapper around LLMs that is impressive created by LLM assistance. I don’t disagree that AI is overhyped. But I think you are probably looking in the wrong place. I think most software that is written isn’t really a product, at least not a public product. It’s an in-house tool or a one-off project needed to complete some larger task. People everywhere are always writing small programs that make their life or job just a bit easier (and…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48335819&quot; title=&quot;LLM doesn&amp;#39;t work, let alone profit.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ziglang.org/devlog/2026/#2026-05-30&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Zig ELF Linker Improvements Devlog&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ziglang.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48338673&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;223 points · 101 comments · by kristoff_it&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Recent updates to the Zig programming language include a new ELF linker supporting fast incremental compilation, a restructured build system for improved performance, and a redesigned type resolution system. Additionally, the standard library now features experimental `io_uring` support and a transition toward a native Zig libc implementation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ziglang.org/devlog/2026/#2026-05-30&quot; title=&quot;Title: Devlog ⚡ Zig Programming Language    URL Source: https://ziglang.org/devlog/2026/    Published Time: Sun, 31 May 2026 03:42:37 GMT    Markdown Content:  This page contains a curated list of recent changes to main branch Zig.    This page contains entries for the year 2026. Other years are available in [the Devlog archive page](https://ziglang.org/devlog/).    May 30, 2026    ## [ELF Linker Improvements](https://ziglang.org/devlog/2026/#2026-05-30)    Author: Matthew Lugg    I’ve spent the past few weeks…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Zig community is increasingly viewing the language as a superior &amp;#34;C replacement&amp;#34; that offers the iteration speed of high-level languages like Python with the performance of C or Rust &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48339182&quot; title=&quot;I am so used to thinking that Zig, Rust, and the likes are only viable in niches where C is viable, but no. not anymore at least - once this linker and incremental compilation on other targets land, Zig will become THE C replacement and that will let me iterate at the speed of JS or Python with performance of C or Rust. even Andrew&amp;#39;s initial dream - to create a DAW with uncompromising UX - will become much easier to create. once someone creates a Zig-native immediate-mode or reactive UI…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48340456&quot; title=&quot;Zig&amp;#39;s been around for ~10 years. It&amp;#39;s more low-level and lightweight than Rust. Different goals, different trade-offs. If Rust is the new C++, Zig is the new C.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Developers are leveraging Zig as a transpilation target for new memory-safe, GC-free languages, citing its robust build system and linker improvements as key advantages &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48340669&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been building a memory safe language that transpiles to Zig with a Go-like runtime that can run interpreted (no GC) or compiled - high-level that feels like Ruby but with incremental typing like TypeScript. The Zig team between 0.16 and this has really made me glad I chose Zig as the target instead of Rust - which probably would&amp;#39;ve been a lot easier to target (since it&amp;#39;s already memory safe). I believed it had the best build system design and was the best transpilation target, and I really…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341043&quot; title=&quot;Working on something kinda similar. No GC, Python feel, managed memory, performance approaching C. It&amp;#39;s here: https://blorp-lang.org if you want to compare approaches.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate whether Zig is replacing Rust or simply occupying a different low-level niche &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48340426&quot; title=&quot;i&amp;#39;m not cool and hip like hacker news devs, but I&amp;#39;ve been seeing Zig a lot, is this the new cool thing on the street? no more Rust?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48340456&quot; title=&quot;Zig&amp;#39;s been around for ~10 years. It&amp;#39;s more low-level and lightweight than Rust. Different goals, different trade-offs. If Rust is the new C++, Zig is the new C.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others discuss its potential for optimizing existing virtual machines like Raku&amp;#39;s MOARVM &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48339902&quot; title=&quot;There has been some speculation about porting the Raku backend (Meta-Object Aware Runtime Virtual Machine - MOARVM)from C to Zig. For example the wider set of Zig Hash options could be a big optimization. Since you ask, the front end is self hosting in NQP and with the ripening RakuAST project increasingly in Raku Grammars. The new AST (6.e.PREVIEW) will bring much better introspection and high level optimization handles. So the potential to refactor/rewrite the VM for substantial speed gains…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nippon.com/en/japan-data/h02783/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Naphtha shortages in Japan&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nippon.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48331786&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;161 points · 121 comments · by takakaze&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Widespread naphtha shortages caused by the Iran war are disrupting Japanese industries, forcing major manufacturers like Calbee and Mizkan to alter packaging or suspend products due to a lack of essential inks, solvents, and resins. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nippon.com/en/japan-data/h02783/&quot; title=&quot;Naphtha Shortages Having a Growing Impact in Japan    The leading Japanese snack-food manufacturer Calbee has made headlines through its announced switch to black-and-white packaging for some of its products due to naphtha shortages, which are having a growing impact on a wide range of industries.    * [Home](/en/)  * [Japan Data](/en/japan-data/)  * Naphtha Shortages Having a Growing Impact in Japan    ![](/en/ncommon/contents/japan-data/3004183/3004183.jpg)    [Japan Data](/en/series/japan-data/)    #…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The naphtha shortage in Japan has forced companies like Calbee to adopt monochrome packaging, a move some argue could be a cost-saving &amp;#34;net positive&amp;#34; given that brand recognition remains high among loyal consumers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48332028&quot; title=&quot;As someone who grew up eating Calbee snacks, I think they’ll be fine. People from my generation aren’t buying Calbee because the bag is colorful. They’re buying it because it’s Calbee and they already know what they’re getting. The packaging could be black and white and I’d still recognize it instantly. The only people I could see being briefly confused are younger consumers. Japanese packaging tends to be very colorful, so we’re all conditioned to identify products partly by color. But people…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48332059&quot; title=&quot;After studying Japanese language and culture for the last 15 years, and spending about 6 months there in total, I would say they have a massive over-packaging problem in general. I&amp;#39;ve never seen a place throw away more plastics than in Japan. If the current oil situation forces a reworking of this system, I&amp;#39;d say all in all, that&amp;#39;s an upside.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics point to more severe consequences, such as shortages in critical dialysis supplies and confusion over missing cooking instructions on food products &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48333118&quot; title=&quot;I think the dialysis supply shortage may be less of a charming quirk than the potato chip bags.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48332518&quot; title=&quot;Buried near the end: Nisshin Seifun Welna stopped printing cooking time on their spaghetti packaging tape. There&amp;#39;s a Japanese consumer somewhere squinting at the package trying to remember if it was 8 mins or 10 mins. This is what &amp;#39;globalized supply chain&amp;#39; looks like up close.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some blame the crisis on domestic subsidy policies favoring gasoline &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48332377&quot; title=&quot;As a result of the Takaichi administration directing subsidies exclusively toward gasoline, oil companies have stopped prioritizing naphtha production, leading to a shortage of daily necessities. The fact that Calbee’s snack packaging has turned monochrome is a direct consequence of this. The Takaichi administration attempted to pressure Calbee into reversing this decision. What is even more alarming is that more than half of the Japanese public supports the Takaichi administration, which is…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others attribute the economic strain to geopolitical tensions and the fragility of globalized supply chains &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48333772&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s how the whole world is feeling about America now, yes. Nobody outside of America and Israel were ever remotely bothered by Iran. Especially not Japan, which had a good relationship with Iran going back a century. It&amp;#39;s really just absurd how America decided to attack a partner of Japan and damage our economy so much for zero benefit whatsoever.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48332518&quot; title=&quot;Buried near the end: Nisshin Seifun Welna stopped printing cooking time on their spaghetti packaging tape. There&amp;#39;s a Japanese consumer somewhere squinting at the package trying to remember if it was 8 mins or 10 mins. This is what &amp;#39;globalized supply chain&amp;#39; looks like up close.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-29</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-29</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.owenmcgrann.com/p/the-dead-economy-theory&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The dead economy theory&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (owenmcgrann.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48324712&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1313 points&lt;/strong&gt; · &lt;strong&gt;1405 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by WillDaSilva&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#34;dead economy theory&amp;#34; posits that aggressive AI-driven labor replacement risks destroying the global consumer base and undermining democratic stability by severing the link between human work and capital, potentially leading to widespread social unrest and a permanent economic precariat. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.owenmcgrann.com/p/the-dead-economy-theory&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Dead Economy Theory    URL Source: https://www.owenmcgrann.com/p/the-dead-economy-theory    Published Time: 2026-05-01T10:43:17+00:00    Markdown Content:  [![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether AI will mirror historical agricultural transitions, where increased efficiency freed labor for new industries, or if it represents a unique threat by automating intelligence itself &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327405&quot; title=&quot;India has the problem with farming that the US is starting to have with AI. Farming in India is still far too labor intensive by world standards. 43% of workers still work in agriculture. [1] For the US, that number is under 2%. China is at 22% as of 2023, and dropping steadily. This inefficient agricultural system is not by accident. It is supported by heavy subsidies. Attempts to cut the subsidies resulted in riots.[2] Trouble is ongoing.  Comments from someone who knows more about this than I…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327496&quot; title=&quot;The industrial revolution was enabled by more efficient agriculture feeing labour to do other work.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48326287&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Why is this time different? If it was just programming being automated, then whatever. Lots of professions have been automated and society adapts. The underlying worry here is that current AI provides a partial automation of intelligence. The endgame for the investors and the corporations using AI is complete automation of intelligence (and manual labor, too). They want a $25,000 robot that works around the clock, and AI models that will do anything a human office worker can do for less…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that market competition will drive companies to use AI to expand rather than just cut costs, others suggest that tech giants often over-hire simply to project growth to investors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48325753&quot; title=&quot;Why is this time different? Won&amp;#39;t super power AI tools allow companies to do more with the same number of people?  Don&amp;#39;t you think a smarter way to run a business is to capture more of the market if you have the resources to do so? If company A decides they just want the same slice of the market they have now and can fire half of their employees and pocket $$$, can&amp;#39;t company B hire the same workers and compete harder with these new extra productive workers they hired?  Won&amp;#39;t the company B tend…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327235&quot; title=&quot;I know this isn&amp;#39;t exactly related, so maybe a low value comment, but it itches in my mind.  Years ago I talked with a recruiter at Facebook and they bragged about how many floors of developers they had working on Messenger in just one location (Seattle). What on earth do you do with that many devs on a project like Messenger?  I mean, really? I feel like in a way, AI just adds to that weird situation of overcapacity.  Maybe we were already oversupplied with talent.  In which case why the heck…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327735&quot; title=&quot;I thought about that a lot too, and in the end I think it just comes down to stupid economics: What do you want them to do with all this money? 1) Most top US tech companies are flooded of money. Everyone dumps money in the SP500. 2) This money has to go somewhere. You can&amp;#39;t just redistribute it as dividends, otherwise it&amp;#39;s an admission that you won&amp;#39;t grow and giving you more money would be a 0 sum game. 3) So you have to invest it somehow, somewhere. 4) Obviously you can spend that money…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant point of contention is whether society should continue to prioritize job creation, with some advocates suggesting we decouple human meaning and survival from traditional employment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48325396&quot; title=&quot;this whole blog post is basically &amp;#39;people need jobs to be happy, so we should design our society such that they need jobs&amp;#39; not only is the premise wrong, but forcing people to work is not a good or ethical way to address this problem most people like the social aspect of work, but not being beholden to their boss we can give people meaning, community, culture, growth, without relying on employment and money we can do better than this&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327642&quot; title=&quot;The flipside is that there must be other work to be done or people starve to death .&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openpath.quest/2026/i-am-retiring-from-tech-to-live-offline/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I am retiring from tech to live offline&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (openpath.quest)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48323683&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;841 points · 579 comments · by PinkG&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chad Whitacre is retiring from the technology industry to live offline, citing the rise of AI as the final factor that discouraged his commitment to open-source development. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openpath.quest/2026/i-am-retiring-from-tech-to-live-offline/&quot; title=&quot;Title: I Am Retiring from Tech to Live Offline    URL Source: https://openpath.quest/2026/i-am-retiring-from-tech-to-live-offline/    Published Time: Fri, 29 May 2026 16:13:53 GMT    Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.  Warning: This is a cached snapshot of the original page, consider retry with caching opt-out.    Markdown Content:  By [Chad Whitacre](https://chadwhitacre.com/) ❧ Published on May 28, 2026    tl;dr AI took the last of the wind out of my…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The transition from tech to retirement is often driven by exhaustion with corporate politics, re-orgs, and &amp;#34;nonsense BS&amp;#34; rather than a dislike of technology itself &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48325411&quot; title=&quot;I have been at it for 20 years now and have started to feel my time is up as well As a lot of comments here highlights, the issue is not so much the tech but the politics, constant perf reviews, re-orgs, nonsense BS that is pushed top-down. This industry is taking a toll on you. My advice for anyone reading this that is starting your career: Live simply and save a lot.  When I started my career I thought I would love doing this forever. I would never imagine I would get burned out in the long…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48326296&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve worked in food service, landscaping and factory jobs. You&amp;#39;re right, the tech job does feel super cushy after gigs like that. But I&amp;#39;m about 25 years in on the tech industry now and I feel the same GP. At some point, you can&amp;#39;t avoid the politics and corp BS and it wears you down. Everything is relative. Now that I have the means to say &amp;#39;I don&amp;#39;t have to or want to do this anymore&amp;#39; I&amp;#39;ll be checking out after this year. It&amp;#39;s been a good run.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some retirees struggle with a loss of passion or frustration over the increasing pressure to use AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48323968&quot; title=&quot;I just retired after 40 years writing code. The last year or so wasn’t fun - battling with AI, trying to get it do what I wanted. For a long time, I thought I’d do a lot of hobby or open source coding when I retired. I haven’t even tried. I’m not burned out, but find I’ve lost the passion for coding I once had. Is that AI? Or is it me? Maybe as my retirement progresses, I can rekindle that passion, but as of now, I don’t miss tech. Sorry, got to go - my garden needs me :-)&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48324116&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; battling with AI, trying to get it do what I wanted What I am selfishly curious about is: is it possible to remain a software developer, and ignore AI? To write code the same way we did before 2022? I understand that there are many companies in which managers demand more of workforce — but are there still places where people are satisfied to not rush ahead and do business same way they did three or four years ago? In other words, is it possible to not battle with AI trying to get it what we…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others find that leaving the professional grind allows them to rediscover their love for coding through autonomous hobby projects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48324352&quot; title=&quot;Funny, if all goes well today is my last day as professional software engineer, after 20 years. I have enough savings to buy a modest cottage and to last me a year or two being frugal. After that it’s anyone’s guess, but I am beyond excited not having to program for a living any more, just on what feels meaningful, in complete autonomy. Projects lined up: a Erlang-like microkernel/runtime I have been designing for the past 4 years, a series of small games that I have been itching to work on,…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48324045&quot; title=&quot;I retired, after 30-some years. Actually, I was forced to retire, by folks that don&amp;#39;t think us greyheads should be working. Fortunately, I had the means to retire. Those means had nothing to do with a FIRE strategy. I just saved, lived humbly, and stayed at a job for a couple of decades. But I have been doubling down on my tech work. Once the knuckleheads were removed from the soup, the flavor improved markedly. I love this tech stuff. Oh, and I have been using AI. It just helped me to find a…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. However, perspectives vary based on background; those who have performed hard labor often view tech as a &amp;#34;cushy&amp;#34; lifelong career &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48326174&quot; title=&quot;It comes down to perspective tbh. For someone who&amp;#39;s worked hard labor throughout their life, the cushy tech job you get is actually worth doing forever. But for people who have never experienced that, I can see why retiring early makes sense, but honestly most of us get to work from home and do our jobs on the computer, which doesn&amp;#39;t require much. It&amp;#39;s still an amazing career to be in IMO&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, while critics argue that public, high-profile &amp;#34;off-grid&amp;#34; retirements can sometimes feel performative or financially reckless &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48326510&quot; title=&quot;This whole thing is eye-searingly performative. Whether or not he follows through and goes dark after this, this farewell is just so ridiculous. Claims to have not used the internet or a phone since February, does all communication via USPS, declares that AI and social media make him hate himself... But somehow is continuing to post on Bluesky, continuing to update his blog, continuing to post YouTube videos, continuing to solicit donations on GoFundMe for personal matters. The account that…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48324489&quot; title=&quot;Nothing like retiring with only 3 years worth of savings and no plan on what to do after that.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rockstarintel.com/gta-6-developers-announce-rockstar-games-union/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GTA 6 Developers Unionize&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (rockstarintel.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48324499&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;749 points · 522 comments · by AndrewKemendo&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rockstar Games developers have formed the Rockstar Game Workers Union under the IWGB to advocate for pay transparency and flexible working while pursuing a legal battle against the company over alleged union-busting dismissals. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rockstarintel.com/gta-6-developers-announce-rockstar-games-union/&quot; title=&quot;Title: GTA 6 Developers Announce Rockstar Games Union    URL Source: https://rockstarintel.com/gta-6-developers-announce-rockstar-games-union/    Published Time: 2026-05-28T13:51:45+00:00    Markdown Content:  # GTA 6 Developers Announce Rockstar Games Union - RockstarINTEL    [Close Menu](https://rockstarintel.com/gta-6-developers-announce-rockstar-games-union/#)    *   [Charts](https://rockstarintel.com/category/charts/)  *   [Community](https://rockstarintel.com/category/community/)  *   [GTA…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The unionization of Rockstar Games developers is viewed by some as a vital step toward reducing &amp;#34;crunch,&amp;#34; improving pay transparency, and lowering turnover to ensure higher product quality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48324944&quot; title=&quot;This is great news, unions not only improve working conditions, but also improve the final product by not having underpaid stressed staff with high turn-over.  It&amp;#39;s a good sign for the future product quality of any company to see workers unionise.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327996&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Together, we are organising around the things we want to change. Starting with:  Pay transparency  Flexible working  An end to crunch That’s a lot of demands, what next? Competitive salary?! /sarcasm I hope more people will start fighting together for better work conditions. Company owners have money and lawyers so workers must unite to fight them back. I’m saying this as employer.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others argue that unions primarily serve members&amp;#39; interests and could lead to higher consumer prices or extended development timelines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48325904&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; but also improve the final product by not having underpaid stressed staff with high turn-over. We&amp;#39;ll see. It&amp;#39;s not like police unions are making life better for citizens. Unions are there for one reason, the union members. This will most likely be good for the employees and good on them for acting in their best interest but it seems just as likely that a unionized rockstar is negative for the consumer in either increased pricea, extended timelines or minimum effort to meet exact requirements…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A central theme of the discussion is why game development pay lags behind &amp;#34;big tech&amp;#34; despite its high engineering complexity; commenters largely attribute this to an oversupply of &amp;#34;starry-eyed&amp;#34; talent willing to trade salary for passion and a name in the credits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48324926&quot; title=&quot;Can anyone comment on why &amp;#39;big video game&amp;#39; dev pay has lagged &amp;#39;big tech&amp;#39; pay so badly? Ostensibly they are doing remarkably similar engineering problem solving, so why is there such a disparity?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48324997&quot; title=&quot;Is it as simple as supply/demand? People love games and game-loving developers are willing to take lower compensation to be in the industry? As a former obsessed gamer, I remember in my 20s I almost would have been willing to work at iD Software without pay if they let me.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327176&quot; title=&quot;Game dev here, have worked on AAA and indie. First off let me get on my high horse and say the engineering in video gaming is generally more complex than the engineering I&amp;#39;ve done working in big tech. You need a lot more creativity and ingenuity to solve the unusual problems you run into in gaming. From there, as others have said, it&amp;#39;s a simple supply and demand issue. Nowadays I am a university professor, nearly every student who comes in wants to pursue one of the three fields: cybersecurity,…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48325298&quot; title=&quot;I think it is mostly just margins. Sure there are lots of people willing to work for no very little money for game dev but I would say there are tons of people willing to work for very little money for FAANG companies because they want that on their resume. In fact since we are on hackernews that is kind of thing people wanting to be entrepreneurs do. Work at recognizable big tech company for a few years. Leave to be a founder of a startup. Investors ... well that guy came from google they must…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some remain skeptical that unions can overcome the human nature behind deadline-driven &amp;#34;crunch,&amp;#34; proponents believe collective bargaining is the only way to counter the power of wealthy company owners &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327996&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Together, we are organising around the things we want to change. Starting with:  Pay transparency  Flexible working  An end to crunch That’s a lot of demands, what next? Competitive salary?! /sarcasm I hope more people will start fighting together for better work conditions. Company owners have money and lawyers so workers must unite to fight them back. I’m saying this as employer.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48328304&quot; title=&quot;How do you end crunch? Teams always work at a more relaxed pace when the deadlines are years out. You can&amp;#39;t beat Parkinson&amp;#39;s law no matter how generous you are with the estimates. We&amp;#39;ve all tried methodologies to counter this problem and create a continuous, sustainable pace. Unfortunately there&amp;#39;s something deep in human nature that prevents us spreading that effort out evenly from day one.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://shawnsmucker.substack.com/p/please-use-ai&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Please Use AI&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (shawnsmucker.substack.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48323101&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;780 points · 392 comments · by garycomtois&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Author Shawn Smucker uses irony to argue that relying on AI for tasks like meal planning, writing, and art sacrifices the messy, meaningful human connections and personal struggles that define the beauty of life. &lt;a href=&quot;https://shawnsmucker.substack.com/p/please-use-ai&quot; title=&quot;Title: Please Use AI    URL Source: https://shawnsmucker.substack.com/p/please-use-ai    Published Time: 2026-05-04T12:40:57+00:00    Markdown Content:  [![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the tension between AI efficiency and the loss of human fulfillment, with some users reporting an &amp;#34;existential crisis&amp;#34; or a lack of ownership and accomplishment when using AI for creative or technical tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48323778&quot; title=&quot;I had this moment when we designed shirts for the marathon we ran as a group.  Instead of Brainstorming something funny, we just prompted ChatGPT and chose one of the results. I felt lost immediately. All the creativity, the humanity, the endless hours of putting soul into something.  Gone For one hour or so I had some kind of existential crisis. Just because of a funny slogan on a shirt.  And sometimes I still feel empty on new projects. You can produce so much things so fast, but if it should be…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48323840&quot; title=&quot;Ever since I started experimenting with AI coding, I&amp;#39;ve totally lost that feeling of accomplishment. For projects I actually developed by typing in the code, it feels like I actually did something--like here&amp;#39;s something I built and am responsible for bringing into the world. When I finish an AI-built project, I feel...nothing. Just that empty: &amp;#39;Code now exists where it didn&amp;#39;t exist before, but I didn&amp;#39;t really do anything.&amp;#39; Without any sense of ownership or attachment whatsoever. If someone…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that AI is a vital tool for those lacking time or social resources &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48323667&quot; title=&quot;This makes me think about that &amp;#39;Dad, how do I?&amp;#39; YouTube channel that made headlines a few years back. People seem to be fine with such a thing existing, they don&amp;#39;t seem to be lamenting that people might go to that channel instead of asking their own fathers. Like, apparently Mr. Smucker has a friend who&amp;#39;s into fly fishing, and the time to talk to that person. Great! Good for him! If I do not have a friend who&amp;#39;s into fly fishing, or if I need an answer quickly, am I...just out of luck? I…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest it should be used as a &amp;#34;critique&amp;#34; partner to push human growth rather than a replacement for effort &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48323903&quot; title=&quot;I am reminded of Veritasium: What Everyone Gets Wrong About AI and Learning (original video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xS68sl2D70 ) from a year ago. &amp;#39;The world is full of heavy things, and yet most of us aren&amp;#39;t ripped.&amp;#39; AI is an opportunity. On the one hand, it can be used to let our minds and social lives atrophy. On the other hand, it is an opportunity to help our minds grow. Most people will make the lazy choice. But you can choose to do otherwise. Take, for example, speeches. I do not…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics worry that replacing human feedback with AI erodes social bonds &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48323945&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Take, for example, speeches. I do not let AI write my speeches. But my speeches are better for having been critiqued by AI. But the result is still my speech. My thoughts, my ideas, my words, and my meaning. Just improved with rounds of feedback about where it fell flat, where I was likely to lose people, and so on. Feedback that I had to fix. &amp;gt; So do not let AI write your speeches. But do use it to push yourself harder. This used to be the job of our friends, families, and coworkers: To push…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, reflecting a broader concern that technology is being used to bypass the &amp;#34;messy&amp;#34; but essential aspects of humanity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48323646&quot; title=&quot;Beautiful piece. I sometimes feel like technologists actually desire to remove the humanity from the world because it&amp;#39;s messy and they don&amp;#39;t understand it and therefore they fear it.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48323605&quot; title=&quot;The poem is absolutely on point. Nobody wants to consume AI content, especially on the parts that should be all-human. At the same time the  poem is published on Substack, instead of a hand-crafted custom blog. There are 1) the tools that let us surface the human, then there is 2) the human, and then there comes 3) the factory generated business (someone doesn’t care but has to do it) content pretending to be human to sell stuff to humans. The human 2) is drowned out by the “had to do it” 3)…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://obeli.sk/blog/sqlite-is-all-you-need-for-durable-workflows/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SQLite is all you need for durable workflows&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (obeli.sk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48326802&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;697 points · 380 comments · by tomasol&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The blog post argues that combining SQLite with Litestream for S3 backups provides a simple, cost-effective alternative to Postgres for managing durable workflow states, particularly for isolated AI agents and experimental systems that do not require high-availability shared databases. &lt;a href=&quot;https://obeli.sk/blog/sqlite-is-all-you-need-for-durable-workflows/&quot; title=&quot;Title: SQLite is All You Need for Durable Workflows  - Blog    URL Source: https://obeli.sk/blog/sqlite-is-all-you-need-for-durable-workflows/    Markdown Content:  2026-05-29  DBOS recently argued that [Postgres is all you need for durable execution](https://www.dbos.dev/blog/postgres-is-all-you-need-for-durable-execution): if you already trust your database, you do not need a separate orchestration tier. I agree with the direction, and I think the idea can be pushed further.    For a large class of…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on a divide between those who view SQLite as an unprofessional choice for production due to its lack of multi-machine concurrency and weak type system &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327679&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand this obsession with SQLite for real, production apps. SQLite is an embedded database, completely unsuitable for managing concurrency. This is what database _servers_ are for, e.g., Postgres, MySQL, etc. Their entire job is to allow you to modify data from multiple processes, on different machines, at the same time. This is a foundational principle of computer science. It seems to me that the &amp;#39;SQLite for everything&amp;#39; crowd is a little bit inexperienced.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48329530&quot; title=&quot;I started using SQLite for a home project after years of reading about it, I was shocked at the poor type system coming from Postgres. It is really inferior, not sure why it gets so much praise. https://sqlite.org/datatype3.html https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/datatype.html Working with date/time feels like using a 30years old database, nothing is enforced at insert. Really someone needs to explain why so many people like it.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, and those who champion its massive real-world deployment and superior performance in single-node environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48328114&quot; title=&quot;That’s why there are billions of SQLite databases right? SQLite is likely used more than all other database engines combined. Billions and billions of copies of SQLite exist in the wild. SQLite is found in: Every Android device  Every iPhone and iOS device  Every Mac  Every Windows 10/11 installation  Every Firefox, Chrome, and Safari web browser  Every instance of Skype  Every instance of iTunes  Every Dropbox client  Every TurboTax and QuickBooks  PHP and Python  Most television sets and set-top cable…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327584&quot; title=&quot;SQLite is surprisingly performant for single node applications even when comparing to Postgres. Postgres consumes a lot more memory and requires IO to hop through IPC whereas you can keep everything in process in SQLite with a shared connection pool. I&amp;#39;ve been testing different storage engines for my agent harness and I can get up to 7.5k concurrent sessions on a single vCPU with SQLite whereas Postgres crashes or runs out connections. [0]…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents highlight its utility in simplifying local agent workflows and reducing memory overhead compared to Postgres &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327121&quot; title=&quot;I started setting up my workflows using Temporal. It deploys as relatively light weight local app. For an isolated local installation it uses SQLite. It makes the process of dealing with API retries and organizing workflows and tasks really simple. I recommend giving it a try. It is, philosophically, exactly what this article is suggesting, but it adds an incredibly rich and flexible interface for agents to work with. Additionally, the web UI makes it very easy to inspect workflows, review…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327584&quot; title=&quot;SQLite is surprisingly performant for single node applications even when comparing to Postgres. Postgres consumes a lot more memory and requires IO to hop through IPC whereas you can keep everything in process in SQLite with a shared connection pool. I&amp;#39;ve been testing different storage engines for my agent harness and I can get up to 7.5k concurrent sessions on a single vCPU with SQLite whereas Postgres crashes or runs out connections. [0]…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, while critics argue that achieving true durability still requires external tools like Litestream &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48326943&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The caveat is that Litestream replication is asynchronous. A restore can miss the newest local writes if the SQLite volume disappears before they are copied. That is fine for many AI and experimentation workflows In short: SQLite is not all you need, unless you’re just experimenting don’t actually care about durability, in which case you also need litestream + object storage. Right.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users suggest that for complex workflows, purpose-built tools like Temporal offer a more reliable alternative to &amp;#34;reinventing the wheel&amp;#34; with raw SQLite &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327121&quot; title=&quot;I started setting up my workflows using Temporal. It deploys as relatively light weight local app. For an isolated local installation it uses SQLite. It makes the process of dealing with API retries and organizing workflows and tasks really simple. I recommend giving it a try. It is, philosophically, exactly what this article is suggesting, but it adds an incredibly rich and flexible interface for agents to work with. Additionally, the web UI makes it very easy to inspect workflows, review…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/nasaspaceflight/status/2060164928472854821&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Blue Origin&amp;#39;s New Glenn blows up during static fire test&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317774&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;502 points · &lt;strong&gt;544 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by enraged_camel&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Blue Origin&amp;#39;s New Glenn rocket exploded during a static fire test, marking a significant setback for the heavy-lift launch vehicle&amp;#39;s development. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/nasaspaceflight/status/2060164928472854821&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;twitter.com&amp;amp;#x2F;nasaspaceflight&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2060164928472854821&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;twitter.com&amp;amp;#x2F;nasaspaceflight&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;20601649284728548...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;nasaspaceflight&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2060164928472854821&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;nasaspaceflight&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;20601649284728548...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The explosion of Blue Origin&amp;#39;s New Glenn is viewed as a crushing setback that could ground the company for over a year due to likely damage to launch infrastructure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48319285&quot; title=&quot;This is a crushing setback for Blue Origin. I feel for the engineers. They have been the underdogs for so long, but with the recent successful recovery of the New Glenn booster, it finally seemed like they had some bragging rights. Now they&amp;#39;re looking at a year minimum before they get back to a regular launch rhythm. The question now is: What went wrong? If they&amp;#39;re lucky, it&amp;#39;s just a stupid mistake. Maybe an incorrect procedure while loading fuel, or maybe a manufacturing error got past QC. If…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48318525&quot; title=&quot;Ouch, losing the rocket is unfortunate, but the damage to the launch infrastructure is going to easily mean over a year of repairs. I hope they&amp;#39;re going to take this as an opportunity to update the infrastructure from lessons learned from the flights so far, and to be able to support some of their future ambitions (e.g. Jarvis).&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters debate whether this failure stems from a &amp;#34;slow-and-steady&amp;#34; methodology that is too risk-averse compared to SpaceX’s rapid iteration, noting that Blue Origin risks falling behind as the &amp;#34;goal posts&amp;#34; move toward fully reusable vehicles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48319528&quot; title=&quot;Crushing only because their cadence is so slow compared to SpaceX. Their process seems much closer to the highly risk averse methodology of traditional incumbents than to SpaceX&amp;#39;s style. Failure becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. Rockets are ridiculously complex. Slow-and-steady wins the race makes sense for many individual components, depending on how well understood the problem domain is, and your ability to rigorously model things. But if you take that approach when testing all the…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48319843&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s an understandable but wrong attitude. If you don&amp;#39;t have high profile failures like this, you aren&amp;#39;t taking enough R&amp;amp;D risk. It&amp;#39;s a fiercely ambitious industry and these launch attempts amount to what literally are moon shots. The race is on between various companies and countries as to who gets there first. Boeing is pretty much out of the race at this point. Just too busy navel gazing and lobbying. There&amp;#39;s a big risk that the next person on the moon might be from China. Blue Origin and…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some find it surprising that century-old rocket technology remains so prone to spectacular failures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48319156&quot; title=&quot;Does anyone else find it surprising that rockets are a century old[1] and yet still seem to fail spectacularly with amazing regularity, often due to some small flaw? Is it just that they&amp;#39;re still relatively niche machines and thus haven&amp;#39;t benefited from mass manufacturing improvements? [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Goddard_and_Rocket.jpg&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others emphasize that the complexity of liquid oxygen and integrated systems makes such &amp;#34;exotic&amp;#34; failures common in high-stakes R&amp;amp;D &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48319285&quot; title=&quot;This is a crushing setback for Blue Origin. I feel for the engineers. They have been the underdogs for so long, but with the recent successful recovery of the New Glenn booster, it finally seemed like they had some bragging rights. Now they&amp;#39;re looking at a year minimum before they get back to a regular launch rhythm. The question now is: What went wrong? If they&amp;#39;re lucky, it&amp;#39;s just a stupid mistake. Maybe an incorrect procedure while loading fuel, or maybe a manufacturing error got past QC. If…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48320057&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; They even requested access to a ULA building to see if a sniper could have taken a shot at the rocket. &amp;gt; It turned out to be an exotic failure: liquid oxygen had gotten caught inside a buckled liner I gotta say, suspecting &amp;#39;Rival company hired a sniper&amp;#39; before &amp;#39;Dealing with liquid oxygen is very fucking hard and incredibly flammable&amp;#39; feels very Elon&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48319528&quot; title=&quot;Crushing only because their cadence is so slow compared to SpaceX. Their process seems much closer to the highly risk averse methodology of traditional incumbents than to SpaceX&amp;#39;s style. Failure becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. Rockets are ridiculously complex. Slow-and-steady wins the race makes sense for many individual components, depending on how well understood the problem domain is, and your ability to rigorously model things. But if you take that approach when testing all the…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, the incident reinforces SpaceX&amp;#39;s dominance and may jeopardize NASA’s lunar timelines, as Blue Origin was recently selected for moon lander missions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48318005&quot; title=&quot;Very unfortunate, but strategically this changes nothing for US spaceflight. If anything, SpaceX will continue to increase its dominance.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;[&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/its-hard-to-justify-framework-12/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;It&amp;#39;s hard to justify buying a Framework 12&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jeffgeerling.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48323869&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;392 points · &lt;strong&gt;640 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by watermelon0&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jeff Geerling argues that the Framework 13&amp;#39;s high price point and competition from more polished, traditional laptops make it difficult to justify for average users despite its modularity and repairability. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/its-hard-to-justify-framework-12/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.youtube.com&amp;amp;#x2F;watch?v=aPVAnwuSjfk&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.youtube.com&amp;amp;#x2F;watch?v=aPVAnwuSjfk&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a fundamental tension between Apple’s superior hardware efficiency and Framework’s commitment to repairability and user freedom. While Apple Silicon offers unmatched performance, battery life, and value—particularly the $499 MacBook Neo—critics argue these benefits are undermined by a &amp;#34;hermetically sealed&amp;#34; design philosophy and restrictive corporate practices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48326142&quot; title=&quot;I was seduced by Apple Silicon after experiencing the exceptional battery life and performance. Those things are great, as are the screens and the speakers. But I&amp;#39;m still excited about the Framework 12 because I don&amp;#39;t love macOS. I don&amp;#39;t need an alternative to beat Apple on every line of the spec sheet. I just need them to align with my values, support Linux well, and cross a certain &amp;#39;good enough&amp;#39; threshold. The latest laptops from Framework meet all of those requirements, and I&amp;#39;m excited to…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48326031&quot; title=&quot;What Framework is trying to do feels like something that would&amp;#39;ve made more sense 10 years ago. And the reason for that is b/c of Moore&amp;#39;s Law approaching its end. The way to manufacture more efficient compute now is do things like put DRAM closer to the chip and even closer integration between CPU and GPU. The fact that Apple can co-design their silicon such that the CPU and GPU can pull from the same pooled RAM is a major advantage over competitors. There are also latency and bandwidth…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48324641&quot; title=&quot;I love that Framework exists and I hope they succeed. I have been recommending them to friends and family who are looking for Windows or Linux laptops, though with some reservations due to the problems with a couple of their models. However I don&amp;#39;t see the value in the Framework 12 over a MacBook Neo if someone isn&amp;#39;t choosing by OS first. The $499 MacBook Neo is just so good for the price and so well built. The $499 price is the education price, which is relevant for the student in the story.…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents of Framework accept lower technical specs to align with their values, such as native Linux support and the ability to swap components, which they view as a necessary stand against Apple&amp;#39;s planned obsolescence and software limitations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48326142&quot; title=&quot;I was seduced by Apple Silicon after experiencing the exceptional battery life and performance. Those things are great, as are the screens and the speakers. But I&amp;#39;m still excited about the Framework 12 because I don&amp;#39;t love macOS. I don&amp;#39;t need an alternative to beat Apple on every line of the spec sheet. I just need them to align with my values, support Linux well, and cross a certain &amp;#39;good enough&amp;#39; threshold. The latest laptops from Framework meet all of those requirements, and I&amp;#39;m excited to…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48326331&quot; title=&quot;As nice as Apple&amp;#39;s hardware is it&amp;#39;s all undermined by who they are as a company, intentionally limiting their devices more and more while they relentlessly argue in courts and to regulators that we owe them more and more for using our devices. Rosetta 2&amp;#39;s retirement announcement was when I realized I won&amp;#39;t buy another Mac, I&amp;#39;m not interested in a computer that is preoccupied with stopping me from running software.  Work can buy them for me but I won&amp;#39;t spend my money on a platform like that…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48324145&quot; title=&quot;This is a brutal (but polite -- classic US Midwestern Geerling &amp;#39;kill them with kindness&amp;#39;!) side-by-side comparison.  My heart goes out to the Framework Computer team.  Any team trying to compete in this product space against the surprise from Mac Neo must feel crushed.  That said, I am still very optimistic for Framework Computer.  It seems like nerds are going wild for them.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some argue that modern chip architecture, which integrates RAM and GPU for efficiency, makes Framework&amp;#39;s modular approach increasingly difficult to justify from a physics and performance standpoint &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48326031&quot; title=&quot;What Framework is trying to do feels like something that would&amp;#39;ve made more sense 10 years ago. And the reason for that is b/c of Moore&amp;#39;s Law approaching its end. The way to manufacture more efficient compute now is do things like put DRAM closer to the chip and even closer integration between CPU and GPU. The fact that Apple can co-design their silicon such that the CPU and GPU can pull from the same pooled RAM is a major advantage over competitors. There are also latency and bandwidth…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.quandri.io/engineering-blog/mcp-is-dead&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;MCP is dead?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (quandri.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48330436&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;394 points · 401 comments · by nadis&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the Model Context Protocol (MCP) is marketed as a universal AI connector, developers argue it is often over-engineered, unreliable, and consumes up to 16% of context windows with tool definitions. Many prefer a &amp;#34;CLI-first&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;Skills&amp;#34; approach to reduce token bloat and improve debugging. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.quandri.io/engineering-blog/mcp-is-dead&quot; title=&quot;Title: MCP is dead | Quandri Engineering    URL Source: https://www.quandri.io/engineering-blog/mcp-is-dead    Markdown Content:  💡    Reference: [MCP is dead. Long live the CLI](https://ejholmes.github.io/2026/02/28/mcp-is-dead-long-live-the-cli.html)    After reading the above article, we ran the experiments on our actual stack. This document covers the original argument, additional research, and our measurements.    ‍    📌    **Update:** Since these measurements were taken, Claude Code has rolled out [Tool…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Proponents argue that the Model Context Protocol (MCP) is essential for providing AI agents with secure, standardized access to services that lack public APIs or CLIs, offering a controlled &amp;#34;service discovery&amp;#34; layer that is easier to govern than a raw shell environment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48330710&quot; title=&quot;I run the team at OpenAI that&amp;#39;s responsible for the ChatGPT App Store, Codex plugins, and all things MCP. The thing that all these &amp;#39;MCP is dead&amp;#39; posts are missing is that whether or not MCP is used as a transport protocol is actually completely irrelevant. The reason MCP isn&amp;#39;t dead is because practically ~every company on the planet is building an MCP server. I know this because we interact with all of them. Most of these companies don&amp;#39;t have a CLI. Many of these companies don&amp;#39;t even have an…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48334669&quot; title=&quot;MCP has a great advantage over agent using cli: MCP is much easier to secure so that it&amp;#39;s hardwired that the agent can only call the pre-configured MCP server. We run our agents so that they don&amp;#39;t have access to public internet, so they could not run any cli commands. It&amp;#39;s all either built-in agent tools, or 3rd party mcp servers. The agents never have access to any credentials, which makes them much more safe to use than a claude code running in yolo mode with fetching random cli binaries from…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48330646&quot; title=&quot;Was this written by AI? MCP is essentially just JSON RPC with a few special fields that must be included.  I have reservations about JSON RPC, but there needs to be some &amp;#39;service discovery&amp;#39; layer for LLMs to interface with. It needs to be available in places like websites, desktop applications, backend services, etc.   The CLI is only one place that these systems interface with. Whatever you replace MCP with will be in a similar shape even if you specify a different communication protocol or…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48331582&quot; title=&quot;Yes, in the same way a programming language would be worse off if they focused all of their effort on building an implementation instead of a language specification. You could literally, deterministically, zero AI, code-gen a CLI from an MCP specification, just like you can with an OpenAPI specification. I&amp;#39;m sure tools exist that do this. So if you want a CLI, there it is. But the problem with a CLI is that it requires a shell environment, and not everywhere you may want to run an agent should…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics contend that MCP is a temporary workaround for model limitations, noting that it adds maintenance overhead and consumes more tokens than direct CLI usage or custom scripts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48332534&quot; title=&quot;I would bet that MCP is going to die. The main reason is that it adds another layer (and human) that can, and probably will, get out of sync with the real-world implementation, whether that implementation is an API, web, or a CLI. AI should not be using a protocol or set of instructions that is different from what humans have access to (know and use). Sure, companies want to expose MCP servers because it is the cool thing to do right now. So the current situation is basically that I used Claude…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48333454&quot; title=&quot;Not having access to the shell is a big hindrance. I have my agent access Gitlab and Jira via CLI tools and in so many cases jq or python is used to manipulate or combine the data into a more useful format, making use of pipes and temporary files. You can of course limit what an agent can do, most easily by not giving it access to things it shouldn&amp;#39;t do. I suppose there are no existing easy gateway methods to grant fine-grained OS-level permissions to add such things back, except perhaps `sudo`…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48330549&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve thought that skills and small scripts &amp;gt; MCP for quite a while now, tried out MCP in the early days (official ones, ones i made for scripts i already had), but they always end up using more tool calls/tokens than if i had just written a script + skill for claude.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some find MCP&amp;#39;s self-advertising schema superior for tool discovery, others observe that models often ignore these servers in favor of more flexible bash commands unless strictly constrained &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48331341&quot; title=&quot;One advantage is the MCP advertises itself to the agent with its schema and api shape. Unless your CLI is in the corpus with lots of examples the agent has to learn every time. Skills help a little bit but I find the recall on skills pretty low. However I also find codex will reliably use MCPs advertised while Claude always reaches for tools like Bash() likely because it’s aligned so heavily on its own tools and is very hard to get to use an MCP if literally any Bash() approach is possible,…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48333454&quot; title=&quot;Not having access to the shell is a big hindrance. I have my agent access Gitlab and Jira via CLI tools and in so many cases jq or python is used to manipulate or combine the data into a more useful format, making use of pipes and temporary files. You can of course limit what an agent can do, most easily by not giving it access to things it shouldn&amp;#39;t do. I suppose there are no existing easy gateway methods to grant fine-grained OS-level permissions to add such things back, except perhaps `sudo`…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20260513-your-car-is-spying-on-you-its-about-to-get-worse&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cars collect a startling amount of data about you&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48318481&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;505 points · 287 comments · by 1vuio0pswjnm7&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Modern cars collect extensive personal data—including location, facial expressions, and driving habits—which is often sold to insurance companies and third-party brokers, a privacy concern expected to intensify as new biometric safety regulations mandate even more in-vehicle monitoring. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20260513-your-car-is-spying-on-you-its-about-to-get-worse&quot; title=&quot;Title: Trillions of miles of data: Your car is spying on you, and it&amp;#39;s only just the beginning    URL Source: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20260513-your-car-is-spying-on-you-its-about-to-get-worse    Published Time: 2026-05-13T10:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  Site search    13 May 2026    Thomas Germain    ![Image 1: Serenity Strull/ Getty Images A collage which shows two internet windows. Two women sit in the front seats of cars and a scanner can be seen on their face, next to a car air freshener…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Modern vehicles and roadside infrastructure have created a dual-sided surveillance network that tracks users through both internal sensors and omnipresent external cameras &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48318644&quot; title=&quot;With cars, networked computers are encroaching on privacy from two sides: the computers inside the car sharing sensor data and the computers outside the car sharing camera data from known points on the road. Older cars may not have cellular data, and some new cars (e.g. the Slate electric car) may be specifically designed without cellular connections or with easily removable chips, but so much can still be inferred from omnipresent roadside surveillance. It&amp;#39;s not enough even to have private…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users advocate for comprehensive legislation to limit data collection and third-party sharing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48318644&quot; title=&quot;With cars, networked computers are encroaching on privacy from two sides: the computers inside the car sharing sensor data and the computers outside the car sharing camera data from known points on the road. Older cars may not have cellular data, and some new cars (e.g. the Slate electric car) may be specifically designed without cellular connections or with easily removable chips, but so much can still be inferred from omnipresent roadside surveillance. It&amp;#39;s not enough even to have private…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48319593&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The solution must be legislation that limits all of: data collected Let&amp;#39;s finish the sentence there. Being spied by corporations 24/7 while we game, watch entertainment, drive, talk with friends, work... it&amp;#39;s fucked up. We live in a hell of our own creation and only new legislation and regulations can get us out of here.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that existing regulations are ineffective because fines are often lower than the profits generated from selling data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48318705&quot; title=&quot;Hyundai received 61 cents per vehicle from Verisk. Honda received 26 cents. California&amp;#39;s $12.75M fine against GM, the largest CCPA penalty ever, is less than the $20M GM made from selling the data.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48318744&quot; title=&quot;Every corporation is trying to spy on you. Why wouldn&amp;#39;t they? There is no real punishment, and large reward. As long as that is true, superficial regulations around tracking will always be circumvented or hollowed out. We need fundamental change in the way corporations interact with society, and in what is expected of them.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a sharp disagreement over the trade-offs of this technology: some highlight its utility in solving petty crimes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48318739&quot; title=&quot;There was a HN user recently on a related post explaining to everyone that they don&amp;#39;t need privacy because they personally aren&amp;#39;t harmed and a murderer was caught by one of these cameras. It turns out protesters don&amp;#39;t need privacy, either, because of various reasons. Same for women seeking adequate healthcare, I&amp;#39;m sure. Or LGBT people attempting to exist. Sorry, I am strawmanning a little. Actually, we&amp;#39;ll simply have regulations on use. Regulation which will certainly be followed this time by a…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48318841&quot; title=&quot;The end state is something like China, where petty street level crime is essentially solved. You can leave your bike unlocked because if anyone stole it the police would find them and return it since they can track the thief on a network of cameras. But like you say, many things which have been crimes were based on unethical laws. It&amp;#39;s easy to two sides this issue, less crime would on a whole be a good thing but some level of committing crime and getting away with it is required for society to…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, while critics warn that such systems are easily abused by authorities and stifle social progress &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48318739&quot; title=&quot;There was a HN user recently on a related post explaining to everyone that they don&amp;#39;t need privacy because they personally aren&amp;#39;t harmed and a murderer was caught by one of these cameras. It turns out protesters don&amp;#39;t need privacy, either, because of various reasons. Same for women seeking adequate healthcare, I&amp;#39;m sure. Or LGBT people attempting to exist. Sorry, I am strawmanning a little. Actually, we&amp;#39;ll simply have regulations on use. Regulation which will certainly be followed this time by a…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48318841&quot; title=&quot;The end state is something like China, where petty street level crime is essentially solved. You can leave your bike unlocked because if anyone stole it the police would find them and return it since they can track the thief on a network of cameras. But like you say, many things which have been crimes were based on unethical laws. It&amp;#39;s easy to two sides this issue, less crime would on a whole be a good thing but some level of committing crime and getting away with it is required for society to…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. To avoid these privacy intrusions, some participants suggest opting for bicycles or older, non-networked vehicles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48318969&quot; title=&quot;Just here to remind you all about bicycles.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48318550&quot; title=&quot;Basically why my car is so old it doesn&amp;#39;t even have a CAN bus. Roslin: I heard you&amp;#39;re one of those people. You&amp;#39;re actually afraid of computers. Adama: No, there are many computers on this ship. But they&amp;#39;re not networked. Roslin: A computerized network would simply make it faster and easier for the teachers to be able to teach- Adama: Let me explain something to you. Many good men and women lost their lives aboard this ship because someone wanted a faster computer to make life easier. I&amp;#39;m sorry…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-05-29/danish-pension-fund-blacklists-spacex-citing-governance-issues&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Danish Pension Blacklists SpaceX over &amp;#39;Catastrophic Governance&amp;#39;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bloomberg.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48324097&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;278 points · &lt;strong&gt;508 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by leopoldj&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-05-29/danish-pension-fund-blacklists-spacex-citing-governance-issues&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are divided over the inclusion of SpaceX in major indexes, with some expressing concern that fast-tracking the company into the S&amp;amp;P 500 forces exposure to &amp;#34;catastrophic governance&amp;#34; onto passive investors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48325220&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s really concerning given how the indexes are changing rules to fast-track SpaceX being forced into index funds. S&amp;amp;P is also working on updates to S&amp;amp;P 500 to force it down everyone&amp;#39;s throats quickly and algorithmically.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48326264&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m usually a Boglehead, with some exceptions, and one exception I&amp;#39;d love is some sort of trade that would eliminate my exposure to SpaceX for the next few years. I&amp;#39;m sure there&amp;#39;s some combo of options that would do it. Probably finding an ESG-focused ETF would do it. ESG basically meant &amp;#39;good governance, we follow laws&amp;#39; which translated into better governed public companies that therefore had better returns, as one would expect. Really weird how it was politicized into something entirely…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see the exclusion as a missed opportunity to own a piece of a revolutionary aerospace leader &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48325211&quot; title=&quot;Imagine not wanting to own a piece of the first company to make a re-usable orbital class booster.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others are actively seeking financial strategies—such as shorting, buying puts, or switching to ESG-focused ETFs—to eliminate SpaceX from their portfolios &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48326264&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m usually a Boglehead, with some exceptions, and one exception I&amp;#39;d love is some sort of trade that would eliminate my exposure to SpaceX for the next few years. I&amp;#39;m sure there&amp;#39;s some combo of options that would do it. Probably finding an ESG-focused ETF would do it. ESG basically meant &amp;#39;good governance, we follow laws&amp;#39; which translated into better governed public companies that therefore had better returns, as one would expect. Really weird how it was politicized into something entirely…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48326374&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I&amp;#39;d love is some sort of trade that would eliminate my exposure to SpaceX You can just short SpaceX of an amount equivalent to its share of your SP500 holdings. You will have to pay borrowing costs though, but on something that liquid it will be very small.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48325380&quot; title=&quot;There is a market for an S&amp;amp;P 500 ETF without those companies. I&amp;#39;ll immediately switch over&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48326429&quot; title=&quot;Shorts have unlimited risk. Buying a put is risk-defined and probably a better strategy.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a broader debate regarding whether companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, or Anthropic should be eligible for indexes at all before demonstrating consistent profitability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48325270&quot; title=&quot;Add Anthropic and OpenAI to the list.  Companies that are bleeding money. Personally, a company should be making money before adding it to the index.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://daringfireball.net/2026/05/what_is_a_dickover&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What Is a Dickover?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (daringfireball.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48330882&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;544 points · 199 comments · by tambourine_man&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;John Gruber has coined the term &amp;#34;dickover&amp;#34; to describe frustrating, unnecessary modal panels and popovers that deliberately obscure website content to demand user interactions, such as cookie consents or newsletter signups. &lt;a href=&quot;https://daringfireball.net/2026/05/what_is_a_dickover&quot; title=&quot;Title: What Is a Dickover?    URL Source: https://daringfireball.net/2026/05/what_is_a_dickover    Markdown Content:  **dickover**_n._ : a modal panel, popover, or curtain presented by a website or app, deliberately obscuring its own content to frustrate the user with an unwanted, unnecessary, mandatory interaction; e.g. asking the user to accept “cookies”, subscribe to a newsletter, install the website’s mobile app, agree to terms of service, or anything else that the user couldn’t give two shits…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on &amp;#34;dickovers&amp;#34;—intrusive UI elements like cookie banners and newsletter popups—with some arguing they are a necessary &amp;#34;price&amp;#34; for free content while others blame them on developers being disconnected from the actual user experience &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48331269&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t get why people feel entitled to _not_ get dickovers. Are you paying for what you&amp;#39;re using, to a sufficient degree that the ecosystem can work without the dickover being presented to you? This shouldn&amp;#39;t be the user&amp;#39;s problem, but this is the market working. The dickovers are there because someone somewhere is making money because the dickovers are there. Saying you want the content without the spam is more or less saying you want other people to do the work and you don&amp;#39;t want to pay for…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48331363&quot; title=&quot;I have a theory that about 97% of developers and managers completed the cookie consent (or whatever) on their own product 5 years ago and hence never see it again, and they have no idea how bad the experience for new customers actually is. So the developers and bosses all think they&amp;#39;re doing a great job and they&amp;#39;ve got a carefully curated homepage, even though the regular users get a cloudflare captcha, then a cookie modal, then a newsletter modal, then an install-our-app modal, all blocking…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users appreciate the blunt terminology, others criticize the name as unprofessional and suggest alternatives like &amp;#34;clickovers&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48331479&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m sorry but this is such a stupid name. Where did the author get this name from? Why would I say that in front of any female colleage or any non-technical layman? We already have a name for this and it is a &amp;#39;popup&amp;#39;. Which sounds better? &amp;#39;Remove this popup&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;Remove this dickover&amp;#39; Be honest.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48331617&quot; title=&quot;One of criteria for inclusion into Kagi Small Web [1] is no dickovers. Thanks for naming it properly John. [1] https://kagi.com/smallweb&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48331551&quot; title=&quot;You could call them &amp;#39;clickovers&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant frustration regarding platforms like Substack that reportedly force these elements onto creators&amp;#39; pages against their wishes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48331760&quot; title=&quot;I explicitly disable these on Substack but it adds them to my posts anyway. I&amp;#39;m not sure if that&amp;#39;s a bug or the thing working as intended, but it was enough to make me stop using it. I don&amp;#39;t want to do that to my readers.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48331849&quot; title=&quot;Substack’s dubious practices aren’t as bad as their dubious politics. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2026/feb/07/revealed-how-s...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mastrojs.github.io/blog/2026-05-23-is-AI-causing-a-repeat-of-frontends-lost-decade/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Is AI causing a repeat of frontend’s lost decade?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mastrojs.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48321631&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;402 points · 332 comments · by xyzal&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mauro Bieg argues that AI is &amp;#34;deskilling&amp;#34; programming by replacing specialized expertise with automated abstractions, mirroring a decade-long trend in frontend development. He warns that while AI increases efficiency for generalists, it risks lowering software quality and weakening the bargaining power of skilled workers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mastrojs.github.io/blog/2026-05-23-is-AI-causing-a-repeat-of-frontends-lost-decade/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Is AI causing a repeat of Frontend’s Lost Decade?    URL Source: https://mastrojs.github.io/blog/2026-05-23-is-AI-causing-a-repeat-of-frontends-lost-decade/    Published Time: Fri, 29 May 2026 13:55:44 GMT    Markdown Content:  [Mauro Bieg](https://github.com/mb21) on May 23, 2026    **What AI is doing to the jobs of programmers feels very familiar to a lot of us frontend developers – because it has happened to us before.**    Let’s first look at the transformation of the frontend and agentic…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate centers on whether AI and high-level abstractions democratize development by removing &amp;#34;accidental complexity&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48322070&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m sure I&amp;#39;m not alone in feeling the &amp;#39;deep expertise&amp;#39; OP laments was actually deeply inconvenient to many people. I understand that there&amp;#39;s a good living to be made from knowing browser quirks, hand-rolling accessible components, mastering CSS specificity, but this is largely accidental complexity. More people building things is straightforwardly good, and if some of those things are slower or less accessible, that&amp;#39;s a tradeoff people are entitled to make. You can argue that abstractions hide…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48322296&quot; title=&quot;The &amp;#39;frontend skills&amp;#39; whose growing irrelevance are bemoaned in this article consist largely of navigating a minefield of unintuitive edge cases, browser incompatibilities, historic baggage, exceptions to exceptions to exceptions. Modern frontend, or the &amp;#39;tower of leaky abstractions&amp;#39;, is finally a common-sense mental model for web development. Supplanted by force on top of an exploding bag of eccentricities that is web standards and conventions. The fact that it works at all and is merely a…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt; or merely accelerate the production of &amp;#34;half-baked&amp;#34; software that sacrifices performance and accessibility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48322200&quot; title=&quot;The problem is, mastering accessibility, intuitiveness, compatibility, responsiveness, scalability, architecture, performance, and all those other less immediately visible, &amp;#39;forward-thinking&amp;#39; parts of UX/software development has always been difficult. Ultra high-level frameworks and now LLMs have, on the other hand, made it even easier to botch all of these and quickly roll out a half-baked MVP. The gap between &amp;#39;acceptable&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;decent&amp;#39; has thus been widening. As a protagonist of &amp;#39;decent&amp;#39;, you…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48322380&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; More people building things is straightforwardly good I still don’t understand this perspective, how is it good when a growing portion of stuff that’s built is straight garbage?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that LLMs possess a latent rigor for standards like a11y that many human developers ignore &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48322070&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m sure I&amp;#39;m not alone in feeling the &amp;#39;deep expertise&amp;#39; OP laments was actually deeply inconvenient to many people. I understand that there&amp;#39;s a good living to be made from knowing browser quirks, hand-rolling accessible components, mastering CSS specificity, but this is largely accidental complexity. More people building things is straightforwardly good, and if some of those things are slower or less accessible, that&amp;#39;s a tradeoff people are entitled to make. You can argue that abstractions hide…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48322458&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; LLMs have, on the other hand, made it even easier to botch all of these and quickly roll out a half-baked MVP Compared to the status quo where people pretty much never consider these things, like accessibility, especially not for an MVP? How many people have never added written aria attribute? I would suspect 90%+ of people touching the frontend. The difference with LLMs is that (1) they have a latent rigor for things that you weren&amp;#39;t going to spend time caring about anyways and, more…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others worry that this reliance devalues deep expertise and risks a &amp;#34;garbage&amp;#34; influx once the human-generated training data dries up &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48322142&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I&amp;#39;d argue back that LLMs likely have a better understanding of a11y conventions than I do as well. No, other people did. They wrote about it, and LLM can sometimes use that. Once they no longer write about it, what then? &amp;gt; More people building things is straightforwardly good, and if some of those things are slower or less accessible, that&amp;#39;s a tradeoff people are entitled to make. That I agree with. The more the merrier, all else being the same. And if &amp;#39;AI&amp;#39; trickled into everything because of…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48322380&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; More people building things is straightforwardly good I still don’t understand this perspective, how is it good when a growing portion of stuff that’s built is straight garbage?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48322321&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It can read the code? Historical discussions around it? Commit histories? And if everyone bunkers up and all that open content dries up starting in 2026, let&amp;#39;s say, what happens?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, proponents believe these tools reward technical understanding by handling defaults &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48322251&quot; title=&quot;Totally. Every &amp;#39;we&amp;#39;re losing our craft&amp;#39; article has the same gloomy shape. That&amp;#39;s enough of a bummer, but they also argue against themselves halfway through. This one, for instance: &amp;gt; But exactly which details are deemed “unimportant” is a very consequential and sometimes subjective decision. And eventually, the details always leak through. Right, so you&amp;#39;re saying this new technology will still reward deep technical understanding, because there&amp;#39;s no way around it. I agree. Why is the whole tone…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, while critics maintain that the shift toward &amp;#34;acceptable&amp;#34; MVPs has led to a sharp decline in software quality and user experience &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48322200&quot; title=&quot;The problem is, mastering accessibility, intuitiveness, compatibility, responsiveness, scalability, architecture, performance, and all those other less immediately visible, &amp;#39;forward-thinking&amp;#39; parts of UX/software development has always been difficult. Ultra high-level frameworks and now LLMs have, on the other hand, made it even easier to botch all of these and quickly roll out a half-baked MVP. The gap between &amp;#39;acceptable&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;decent&amp;#39; has thus been widening. As a protagonist of &amp;#39;decent&amp;#39;, you…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48322309&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Frontend&amp;#39;s Lost Decade&amp;#39; has nothing to do with a11y or semantic HTML. The original talk argues performance went to hell because of React and friends, which is why we have electron CRUD apps that consume 2GB+ RAM.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://koenvangilst.nl/lab/mistral-ai-now-summit&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Notes from the Mistral AI Now Summit&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (koenvangilst.nl)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48325340&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;463 points · 210 comments · by vnglst&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the AI Now Summit, Mistral AI positioned itself as a full-stack European partner, focusing on on-premise sovereignty, specialized small models for industrial use, and enterprise partnerships rather than just raw model innovation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://koenvangilst.nl/lab/mistral-ai-now-summit&quot; title=&quot;Title: Notes from the AI Now Summit by Mistral    URL Source: https://koenvangilst.nl/lab/mistral-ai-now-summit    Published Time: 2026-05-29    Markdown Content:  May 29, 2026    4 min read    *   [ai](https://koenvangilst.nl/tag/ai)  *   [article](https://koenvangilst.nl/tag/article)    I was in Paris the last few days to visit the AI Now Summit by Mistral AI, hoping to learn more about their models, plans for the future of European AI and more. My personal insights:    **Mistral is no longer just a model…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Mistral is praised for its strategic focus on European-hosted, on-premise solutions for regulated industries &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48326047&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; BNP Paribas runs Mistral models on-prem for KYC in Belgium, with sensitive data staying within the bank&amp;#39;s walls. Abanca is using agent orchestration to handle sensitive customer information at a huge scale (2 million customers in their app). For European companies in regulated industries, this is a good alternative to relying on US hyperscalers. Mistral leaning into on-prem and European-hosted models is very smart.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, there is a growing consensus that the company has fallen significantly behind competitors like DeepSeek, Qwen, and US frontier labs in terms of model quality and reasoning capabilities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48326538&quot; title=&quot;OK, I&amp;#39;m 100% rooting for both Mistral and task focused small models. But Mistral has fall really far behind since 2025Q3. It seems they can&amp;#39;t get good reasoning models working at even medium context sizes, which is necessary to be at the table right now. Gemma4 and Qwen3.6 are currently best in the small size; Mistral&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;small&amp;#39; model has ~4x the parameter count at 120B and isn&amp;#39;t even competing with models a quarter its size. Back one year ago with Mistral Small 3.1 they were keeping up, but…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327591&quot; title=&quot;I agree. I am a paying Le Chat Pro user, really rooting for a European alternative. But the quality difference between Mistral and the frontier labs is growing too big to ignore. It’s worrying to me that they didn’t talk much about new models at the conference, because that is really where their focus should be IMHO. I am wondering what is keeping them back, though: Money? Compute? Skills? Training data? My fear is that you are really only getting really good models by training on very dubious…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327267&quot; title=&quot;I really want Europe to be part of the AI development and research. And I strongly cheered for Mistral. But they are accumulating too much technological delay. This needs to be fixed, otherwise it will turn into yet another proof we are not able to run large tech with good results. Basically any Chinese lab is doing much better. It&amp;#39;s not Mistral that created I don&amp;#39;t want to say DeepSeek, but MiMo 2.5, Minimax 2.7, and so forth. There are only weaker and/or larger and slower (no MoE) models. Not…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48328040&quot; title=&quot;DeepSeek is both cheaper and better than Mistral.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Commentators attribute this technological delay to a lack of compute and funding &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327879&quot; title=&quot;My theory with no insider information: it’s a little of all of the above, but mostly money. To some extent, you can dig yourself out of a data hole with RL and a lot of compute. And you can buy a lot of compute and some data with a lot of money. Big labs have been operating in this regime for a while and it’s one of the drivers behind their costs beyond just scaling the weights and doing the actual training. Mistral just doesn’t have access to this level of compute or the money to try and…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, as well as the potential stifling effects of the EU&amp;#39;s regulatory environment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327591&quot; title=&quot;I agree. I am a paying Le Chat Pro user, really rooting for a European alternative. But the quality difference between Mistral and the frontier labs is growing too big to ignore. It’s worrying to me that they didn’t talk much about new models at the conference, because that is really where their focus should be IMHO. I am wondering what is keeping them back, though: Money? Compute? Skills? Training data? My fear is that you are really only getting really good models by training on very dubious…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327466&quot; title=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_Intelligence_Act#Pe... Europe shot itself in the dick with this hastily implemented at the height of mass hysteria bullshit and now no sane company will build anything there. an AI startup in the US or China can be a boy and his computer. in Europe, the boy needs a dozen lawyers. Mistral&amp;#39;s sinking into irrelevancy despite the head start they had, the very promising early models they released, and the funding they receive, might very well be the…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite rooting for a European alternative, users express concern that Mistral&amp;#39;s current models are becoming too large and inefficient to remain relevant in the fast-moving AI landscape &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48326538&quot; title=&quot;OK, I&amp;#39;m 100% rooting for both Mistral and task focused small models. But Mistral has fall really far behind since 2025Q3. It seems they can&amp;#39;t get good reasoning models working at even medium context sizes, which is necessary to be at the table right now. Gemma4 and Qwen3.6 are currently best in the small size; Mistral&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;small&amp;#39; model has ~4x the parameter count at 120B and isn&amp;#39;t even competing with models a quarter its size. Back one year ago with Mistral Small 3.1 they were keeping up, but…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327267&quot; title=&quot;I really want Europe to be part of the AI development and research. And I strongly cheered for Mistral. But they are accumulating too much technological delay. This needs to be fixed, otherwise it will turn into yet another proof we are not able to run large tech with good results. Basically any Chinese lab is doing much better. It&amp;#39;s not Mistral that created I don&amp;#39;t want to say DeepSeek, but MiMo 2.5, Minimax 2.7, and so forth. There are only weaker and/or larger and slower (no MoE) models. Not…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48327287&quot; title=&quot;agreed, the next price increase from frontier labs (and the inevitable limits decrease in subscription tiers) will have people thinking real hard about their model providers and that&amp;#39;s when mistral should be ready. however, given their recent performance, I realistically don&amp;#39;t have my hopes high up.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://noperator.dev/posts/you-can-just-say-it/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;You can just say it&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (noperator.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48324853&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;397 points · 215 comments · by antirez&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that human value should be viewed as inherent rather than conditional on output quality, noting that while AI can generate substantial form, it often lacks the discernible intent found in human creation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://noperator.dev/posts/you-can-just-say-it/&quot; title=&quot;Title: You can just say it    URL Source: https://noperator.dev/posts/you-can-just-say-it/    Published Time: 2026-05-28T00:00:00Z    Markdown Content:  There is a weird collection of arguments for appraising the value of humans and their creative artifacts. It usually goes something like this: In the age of AI, we should still prefer humans in certain roles because AI could _never_ perform the tasks required for that role. Or, a human can at least do it _better_. Or, perhaps the output from a human…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The use of LLMs in communication is often perceived as insulting or disingenuous, leading to the sentiment that if a sender cannot be bothered to write a message, the recipient should not be bothered to read it &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48330854&quot; title=&quot;This quote from the authors friend really hit home with me. &amp;gt; “If you’re going to use an LLM to write me an email, I’d much rather you just send me the prompt; at least then I’d have an idea of what you actually meant to say.” I’m not saying there’s no merit in adding a bit of politeness and professionalism to your communication, which I’m sure the prompt itself lacks. However the root of what you’re trying to convey is the prompt, wrap that in a header and a signature. Not only are we talking…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48330984&quot; title=&quot;Also I just find it a little insulting if someone sends me an AI response. If you can&amp;#39;t be bothered to write it, I can&amp;#39;t be bothered to read it.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some users argue that AI serves as a vital accessibility tool for those with dyslexia to ensure their ideas are conveyed clearly and without misunderstanding &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48331035&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m dyslexic. I put every comment through the LLM, or other tools. Including this comment. I understand where you&amp;#39;re coming from but please believe me when I tell you that if I write comments myself nobody will understand them and it just turns into an argument where people claim I say things that I didn&amp;#39;t say. By filtering my comments through an llm, I have reduced this issue significantly.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While there is a desire for raw, direct prompts over &amp;#34;insipid&amp;#34; AI-expanded text, others suggest that traditional politeness and structural rules remain necessary to prevent social friction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48330854&quot; title=&quot;This quote from the authors friend really hit home with me. &amp;gt; “If you’re going to use an LLM to write me an email, I’d much rather you just send me the prompt; at least then I’d have an idea of what you actually meant to say.” I’m not saying there’s no merit in adding a bit of politeness and professionalism to your communication, which I’m sure the prompt itself lacks. However the root of what you’re trying to convey is the prompt, wrap that in a header and a signature. Not only are we talking…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48331059&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, that&amp;#39;s one of those sentiments where people say it but they probably don&amp;#39;t mean it literally. Much like if your boss asks for honest feedback giving it to them with both barrels is a career limiting move. You make subtle mistakes in how you perceive the world, the interlocutor makes similar mistakes and the damage those mistakes do is limited if you follow some structural rules of how to communicate (aka politeness). AIs only rewrite what is in the prompt with more words so it can be…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond communication, the discussion touches on the existential threat AI poses to human value, with some hoping it forces a decoupling of human worth from labor output while others advocate for collective ownership of the technology &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48330862&quot; title=&quot;There is a class of human output that will retain value regardless of AI capability: art and sport. People care about the creator. The source defines the work, the awe, and the emotional response. But almost all output outside that space is at risk of AI displacement. Corporations are amoral entities that optimize for profit, and they follow the law only as much as they must. The law is our collective action. We socially construct what we value. We could fight to preserve the 5-day work week…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48330645&quot; title=&quot;So many people have spent a lot of energy dehumanizing others on the basis of their “contribution to society”. Ideas like, if you aren’t employed, you shouldn’t have access to healthcare, etc. I can only hope that AI can force people to rethink whether their value is tied to their work output or not.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48330815&quot; title=&quot;It goes beyond that. There is inherent classism in this, because it implies that you do not question the value of wealthy people who put in relatively little actual work output due to their privileged position. Take for example the unemployed person in your example who might have literally been 100 times more productive in their career solving substantive problems than a VC who lucked out on their startup and has been cruising on a few boards for ten years.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/robinostlund/homeassistant-volkswagencarnet/issues/967&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Volkswagen blocks Home Assistant by requiring client assertion&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48319509&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;389 points · 190 comments · by Kwastie&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Volkswagen has reportedly disabled its free, unofficial API, preventing the Home Assistant integration from logging in while official mobile apps remain functional. Users suggest the change may require third-party developers to register for official access or use paid commercial alternatives to maintain vehicle connectivity. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/robinostlund/homeassistant-volkswagencarnet/issues/967&quot; title=&quot;Title: [BUG] Login no more possible, Android App still works    URL Source: https://github.com/robinostlund/homeassistant-volkswagencarnet/issues/967    Published Time: 2026-05-27T09:40:36.000Z    Markdown Content:  # [BUG] Login no more possible, Android App still works · Issue #967 · robinostlund/homeassistant-volkswagencarnet    [Skip to content](https://github.com/robinostlund/homeassistant-volkswagencarnet/issues/967#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Volkswagen&amp;#39;s decision to block Home Assistant via client assertion is viewed as a symptom of a risk-averse, &amp;#34;old guard&amp;#34; corporate culture that prioritizes bureaucratic security over user experience &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48320266&quot; title=&quot;I recently saw a group of automakers together during an event. The contrast between Chinese and Germans was bizare. The group of german automakers were older men in black suits all wearing badge with titles like Senior Executive Sales blablabla. Whereas the Chinese were all young people wearing causual clothing and much more engineering minded. No wonder why european auto makers are doing so badly. They forgot to please people. The only know how to please their untergang.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48320352&quot; title=&quot;This could equally illustrate the difference between long established multi national companies with an overbearing corporate culture vs young upstart companies with a dynamic startup culture.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48320734&quot; title=&quot;They already add cryptographic authentication to some CAN messages, so you can&amp;#39;t change them. It is only a matter of time until they add encryption. This is mostly a corporate problem of risk aversion in my opinion. Some department   writes down a risk assessment with a list of miniscule risks, for example of some 3rd party app backend being hacked. Or just a headline &amp;#39;Tinkerer hacked his car to use with his home assistant&amp;#39; in the local press.  This list circulates, and since nobody in the middle…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters argue that such moves stifle interoperability and should potentially be illegal, noting that while Tesla maintains a superior API ecosystem, European manufacturers are falling behind due to a lack of engineering-minded leadership and access to startup capital &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48320523&quot; title=&quot;The question is why doesn&amp;#39;t Germany have any young upstart auto companies when the US and China do? The question being the rhetorical kind.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48320314&quot; title=&quot;There needs to be a law that makes remote attestation - no matter who provides the root certificates, Google/Apple/GrapheneOS - illegal. There is only one use for this technology right now, and it is to prevent people from doing what they want to do with the devices they own, while also making interoperability cryptographically impossible. This is anti-competitive and should simply be illegal.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48320787&quot; title=&quot;Access to capital, mostly. The US has always been willing to grant hefty amounts of taxpayer money to startups, something culturally foreign to Germany (startups are risky, Germans don&amp;#39;t want taxpayer money to be spent on risky adventures that might bring losses) and the US also has dozens of billions of dollars a month in 401k pension savings making their way into the asset markets. And China, well, it&amp;#39;s a dictatorship with effectively unlimited foreign currency reserves. They can do whatever…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48320367&quot; title=&quot;/me scratches VAG cars from a possible new EV purchase. I hate Elon as much as the next guy, but Tesla is still playing the API game way better than the rest of the pack (even with the &amp;#39;not so new&amp;#39; Tesla Fleet API change)&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users are already turning to hardware-level workarounds like CANBUS sniffers to maintain control over their vehicle data, despite the increasing use of cryptographic authentication by manufacturers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48320481&quot; title=&quot;Quite a few other manufacturers have done the same thing. I use a reverse engineered Polestar library to get charging status but I&amp;#39;m in the middle of building a CANBUS sniffer to do the same job because I don&amp;#39;t trust they won&amp;#39;t do the same thing as this. I don&amp;#39;t really understand it, it doesn&amp;#39;t seem to offer a huge potential revenue stream and it pisses off the people who are most invested in your product.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48320734&quot; title=&quot;They already add cryptographic authentication to some CAN messages, so you can&amp;#39;t change them. It is only a matter of time until they add encryption. This is mostly a corporate problem of risk aversion in my opinion. Some department   writes down a risk assessment with a list of miniscule risks, for example of some 3rd party app backend being hacked. Or just a headline &amp;#39;Tinkerer hacked his car to use with his home assistant&amp;#39; in the local press.  This list circulates, and since nobody in the middle…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://steve-yegge.medium.com/the-last-technical-interview-bc13ddcf4564&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Last Technical Interview&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (steve-yegge.medium.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48328405&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;265 points · 267 comments · by headalgorithm&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://steve-yegge.medium.com/the-last-technical-interview-bc13ddcf4564&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate centers on whether &amp;#34;work-sample testing&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;provisional employment&amp;#34; is the superior alternative to flawed FAANG-style interviews. Proponents of work samples argue they are the &amp;#34;gold standard&amp;#34; for standardization and scalability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48331431&quot; title=&quot;The gold standard in hiring qualification is work-sample testing. It works fine. You do not need to &amp;#39;make hiring a profit center&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;provisionally hire&amp;#39; or do internships. Work samples done correctly demand less time from candidates than interviews and scale better than interviews. They are standardizable and iterable. What I feel like I&amp;#39;m reading here is someone who has been poisoned by FAANG hiring practices --- and they are terrible --- and has missed most of the work that&amp;#39;s been done…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, though critics contend they discriminate against candidates with limited free time and are increasingly vulnerable to AI-assisted cheating &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48331657&quot; title=&quot;The problem with work-sample testing (which is commonly administered as a take-home problem for the developer candidate to solve) is two-fold: a) it discriminates against people who cannot spare 4+ hours of focused time on evenings/weekends to work on the problem. People with multiple jobs, single parents, etc. b) in the age of AI it is no longer a reliable measure of someone&amp;#39;s skill, for obvious reasons Unlike Yegge, I haven&amp;#39;t worked at FAANG, but the companies I have worked at all followed…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48332428&quot; title=&quot;I think a very real problem is that these take home problems are often way more than 4 hours. And to that they often add the traditional 4-6 hour interview loop. Provisional employment doesn’t work for most cases, though. It might attract people who have no job and it might attract people who have so much saved that they are okay with potentially being let go after 90  days. But I imagine the vast majority of the potential employment pool are not willing to quit their current job to accept a…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest provisional hiring or internships to evaluate real-world performance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48331657&quot; title=&quot;The problem with work-sample testing (which is commonly administered as a take-home problem for the developer candidate to solve) is two-fold: a) it discriminates against people who cannot spare 4+ hours of focused time on evenings/weekends to work on the problem. People with multiple jobs, single parents, etc. b) in the age of AI it is no longer a reliable measure of someone&amp;#39;s skill, for obvious reasons Unlike Yegge, I haven&amp;#39;t worked at FAANG, but the companies I have worked at all followed…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue this is impractical for most workers who cannot risk quitting stable jobs for a &amp;#34;maybe&amp;#34; position &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48332964&quot; title=&quot;The &amp;#39;provisional employment&amp;#39; idea sounds good at first, until you think about how it would actually work in practice. You have 100 applicants for 1 position. Which one do you provisionally hire? Ah of course, we have to do a traditional interview loop to evaluate 10 candidates before we can pick one. So you do the traditional interview loop, and then you have 6 months of provisional employment. You haven&amp;#39;t replaced anything, you&amp;#39;ve just added another level of hassle for everyone.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48332428&quot; title=&quot;I think a very real problem is that these take home problems are often way more than 4 hours. And to that they often add the traditional 4-6 hour interview loop. Provisional employment doesn’t work for most cases, though. It might attract people who have no job and it might attract people who have so much saved that they are okay with potentially being let go after 90  days. But I imagine the vast majority of the potential employment pool are not willing to quit their current job to accept a…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, there is significant disagreement regarding the author&amp;#39;s claim that U.S. labor laws make firing difficult; many commenters point out that &amp;#34;at-will&amp;#34; employment allows for termination without cause in most states &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48338575&quot; title=&quot;A mess to fire someone? Every state except Montana lets employers fire without giving a reason.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48339230&quot; title=&quot;in most states, as long as it&amp;#39;s not discriminatory, you CAN fire anyone for any reason the article is wrong here&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, though the personal and legal stakes of firing still weigh heavily on employers [&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/Hawzen/I-found-a-seashell-in-the-middle-of-the-desert#i-found-a-seashell-in-the-middle-of-the-desert&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I found a seashell in the middle of the desert&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48318402&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;414 points · 109 comments · by Hawzen&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer created an interactive, web-based terminal experience that simulates finding and exploring a digital &amp;#34;seashell&amp;#34; in a desert environment. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/Hawzen/I-found-a-seashell-in-the-middle-of-the-desert#i-found-a-seashell-in-the-middle-of-the-desert&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;shell.hawzen.me&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;shell.hawzen.me&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether the object found is a genuine fossil, with some arguing it is likely a &amp;#34;steinkern&amp;#34;—a mineral cast of the animal&amp;#39;s interior rather than the shell itself &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48344051&quot; title=&quot;One thing that will have thrown the author off the trail is that he is holding a fossil of the organic parts of the snail and that is essentially a cast of the animal, not the shell. They are known as Steinkerns (stonecore). The insides get replaced by minerals, which harden, the shell dissolves, then the only fossil remaining is a mould of the inside of what used to be the shell. So on a fundamental level, the headline is wrong. He did not find any sort of shell...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find the discovery unremarkable because many desert regions were historically submerged under ancient oceans &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48340913&quot; title=&quot;Huh? Plenty of places have geology where the rocks were formed under ancient oceans and are full of sea fossils.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341820&quot; title=&quot;St. Stephens cathedral in Vienna was built with sandstone that contains seashells. It&amp;#39;s hundreds of kilometers away from the shore, but ~15 million years ago the area where it stands now was a seabed. The stones are not from the exact location where it was built, but from close by. The quarry where the stones came from hundreds of years ago is still active, and you can find tons of fossils there. It&amp;#39;s practically impossible to get a piece of rock from there without visible seashells.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341872&quot; title=&quot;Was the land lower, the seas higher, or some combination, way back when?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others criticize the author for performing an extensive analysis without first confirming the specimen&amp;#39;s authenticity through expert study &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48340945&quot; title=&quot;Maybe. But I don’t see anything in this piece that says that it’s a fossil, rather than something that resembles this person’s idea of a fossil. It doesn’t look like a fossil to me. It looks like a piece of rock that’s been bashed about a bit. And given the whole premise of the piece is “this should not be here!” I don’t really understand the point you’re making. The author says it’s a strange find in that area - so either they have a valid point or they don’t. I don’t know if it’s a fossil. It…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the skepticism, some commenters offer constructive advice on using morphological features like the siphonal canal to narrow down the gastropod&amp;#39;s classification &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341026&quot; title=&quot;Cool find and a very interesting analysis! There&amp;#39;s a lot more to morphology than just the shape of the shell, and indeed the shape can sometimes be misleading, in that very different species can have somewhat similar shells, and different individuals of the same species can have quite different shell shapes. You&amp;#39;ve got a gasteropod, so it would be good to pay special attention to the peristome and siphonal canal (based on the bio classes I took in the area, I&amp;#39;m no expert) but of course there&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.invenglobal.com/articles/22330/stop-killing-games-movement-gains-momentum-california-assembly-passes-game-protection-bill&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The California state assembly has passed the &amp;#39;Protect Our Games Act&amp;#39;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (invenglobal.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48328365&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;223 points · 223 comments · by TechTechTech&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The California State Assembly passed the &amp;#34;Protect Our Games Act,&amp;#34; which requires publishers to ensure digital games remain playable or provide refunds after service termination, a major milestone for the &amp;#34;Stop Killing Games&amp;#34; movement. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.invenglobal.com/articles/22330/stop-killing-games-movement-gains-momentum-california-assembly-passes-game-protection-bill&quot; title=&quot;Title: &amp;#39;Stop Killing Games&amp;#39; Movement Gains Momentum: California Assembly Passes Game Protection Bill    URL Source: https://www.invenglobal.com/articles/22330/stop-killing-games-movement-gains-momentum-california-assembly-passes-game-protection-bill    Published Time: 2026-05-29T02:57:04+00:00    Markdown Content:  [![Image 1: &amp;#39;스탑 킬링 게임&amp;#39; 한 발 더 전진...캘리포니아 게임 보호법 하원…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#34;Protect Our Games Act&amp;#34; is viewed by some as a consumer protection &amp;#34;slam dunk&amp;#34; that forces developers to plan for the inevitable end of a game&amp;#39;s lifecycle &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48330322&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m always shocked by how irrationally anti-regulation this site is. I have yet to see any explanation why this regulation would be, in practice, cost/legally prohibitive in any way. This seems like a consumer protections slam dunk. Yes, you would have to make sure your server application adheres to software licenses before release, just like you do with the client application, or any other piece of software a company may use or release. What popular libraries are we concerned about no longer…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue the bill’s narrow scope and numerous loopholes—such as exemptions for subscriptions and free-to-play titles—will simply incentivize developers to adopt even more restrictive business models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48328536&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The bill applies to digitally sold games. However, it excludes games provided via subscription services, free-to-play games, and games that are inherently playable offline indefinitely. It also prohibits the continued sale or distribution of games that have become unusable due to service termination. I believe this is the key paragraph. I wonder if this will be an incentive towards making more games qualify for those exceptions. I think the previous cases where this act would apply are few…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48328598&quot; title=&quot;California and meaningless feel good legislation with massive loopholes? A match made in heaven! If this is how the bill ends up being enacted, it will only push more big game developers into making their titles subscription only. A win for gamers&amp;#39; rights, I suppose.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48329189&quot; title=&quot;So this only really applies to games you have to purchase once but are online-only? That&amp;#39;s... an incredibly narrow law, that only covers a class of games which are particularly stupid by design. (Continuous cost without continuous revenue.)&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48329341&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not meaningless feel-good legislation, it&amp;#39;s actively harmful by disincentivizing a bad thing, in favor of an even worse thing. See also car fuel economy standards that push car makers into killing the wagon market segment in favor of SUVs.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest requiring the release of server binaries as a compromise &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48328552&quot; title=&quot;The reasonable compromise should be to force devs to release server binaries if they are not willing to run the servers themselves.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend this is an unreasonable demand that forces companies to perform unpaid labor and expose proprietary intellectual property &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48328679&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think forcing a person or business to divulge their intellectual property, simply because they no longer wish to provide downstream products or services, is reasonable. That said, as a consumer I really don&amp;#39;t like when something goes away. Overwatch 1 was probably the most brutal experience for me. In the end, I don&amp;#39;t think anyone has any kind of special entitlements here. The server binaries will almost always include other proprietary information that the studio will not want to…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also skepticism regarding enforcement, with predictions that studios will use shell companies to bypass liability when shutting down services &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48329384&quot; title=&quot;They are going to do what movie industry is already doing: create shell company for release of each game. Then they will shut down the company when they want, and there will be nobody to come for.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://buildingbetter.tech/p/i-read-the-claude-code-source-code&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Claude Code – Everything you can configure that the docs don&amp;#39;t tell you&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (buildingbetter.tech)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48318174&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;326 points · 65 comments · by ankitg12&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An analysis of the Claude Code source code reveals numerous undocumented features, including a &amp;#34;YOLO Classifier&amp;#34; for natural language safety configurations, persistent agent memory, background &amp;#34;dream&amp;#34; consolidation for learning, and advanced hook scripts that can programmatically rewrite tool inputs or auto-approve actions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://buildingbetter.tech/p/i-read-the-claude-code-source-code&quot; title=&quot;Title: I Read the Claude Code Source Code. Here&amp;#39;s Everything You Can Configure That the Docs Don&amp;#39;t Tell You.    URL Source: https://buildingbetter.tech/p/i-read-the-claude-code-source-code    Published Time: 2026-04-01T16:19:07+00:00    Markdown Content:  [![Image 1: Enabling Claude Code to work more autonomously \…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are divided on the value of undocumented configurations, with some warning that the rapid release cycle of Claude Code makes relying on such tricks risky and prone to breaking &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48320213&quot; title=&quot;claude package has ten new versions published per week, and one new model every few months, one should definitely not rely on some undocumented tricks around it: it&amp;#39;ll change, it&amp;#39;ll break deep ultra-specific configurations&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48320321&quot; title=&quot;in my experience, &amp;#39;undocumented tricks&amp;#39; break as often as documented features like when they removed &amp;#39;clear context and execute plan&amp;#39; option after releasing 1M opus because &amp;#39;context window is not a problem anymore&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some praise the tool&amp;#39;s extensive feature set &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48320949&quot; title=&quot;Claude Code’s feature cardinality is breathtaking. At this rate, the next pope will be from Anthropic&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others report frustration with the agent &amp;#34;giving up&amp;#34; on complex tasks compared to competitors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48321332&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Honest status &amp;gt; Not at 100% - and I want to be straight about why that&amp;#39;s a longer road... https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/961eff6c-0060-45d... I just want Claude Code to stop giving up on achieving tasks. It&amp;#39;s so annoying. Even with `/goal` or the new `ultracode` it gives up constantly. My project is very complex ( https://github.com/mohsen1/tsz ) but Codex has no problem keep grinding without stopping like that&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also touches on the emerging architectural patterns of AI coding agents and technical critiques of the tool&amp;#39;s internal classification methods &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48322140&quot; title=&quot;Is there an AI Coding Agent application structure emerging that is more or less universal across llm models? Is anyone collecting and writing on how to understand this architectural style?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48319832&quot; title=&quot;That example classifier is horrendous. A simple substring search for ls/cat/echo/etc?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theregister.com/security/2026/05/28/microsoft-0-day-feud-escalates-as-researcher-threatens-another-windows-exploit-dump/5248085&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft 0-day feud escalates as researcher threatens another exploit dump&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theregister.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48328175&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;274 points · 97 comments · by Cider9986&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A disgruntled security researcher known as Nightmare Eclipse has threatened to release a major &amp;#34;bone shattering&amp;#34; batch of Windows exploits on July 14, following a feud with Microsoft over uncoordinated vulnerability disclosures and the alleged deletion of their bug reporting account. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theregister.com/security/2026/05/28/microsoft-0-day-feud-escalates-as-researcher-threatens-another-windows-exploit-dump/5248085&quot; title=&quot;Disgruntled 0-day hunter &amp;#39;humiliated&amp;#39; by Microsoft pledges &amp;#39;bone shattering drop&amp;#39; as Redmond calls cops    Six 0-days, three under active exploitation, more to come on July 14?    [Jump to main content](#main)    Search    TOPICS    * Security    + [All Security](/security)    + [Cyber-crime](/cyber_crime)    + [Patches](/patches)    + [Research](/research)    + [CSO](/cso)  * Off-Prem    + [All Off-Prem](/off_prem)    + [Edge + IoT](/edge_iot)    + [Channel](/channel)    + [PaaS + IaaS](/tag/paas-iaas)    +…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The ongoing feud between Microsoft and security researcher Eclipse highlights a growing frustration with &amp;#34;user-hostile&amp;#34; bug reporting systems and the tendency of major tech corporations to attack messengers rather than fix vulnerabilities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48331127&quot; title=&quot;Attacking the messenger is an age-old trend in the bug reporting arena. Microsoft has the backing of many governments, and has access to the best legal teams possible, leaving this guy in a world of hurt. Microsoft seems to have brought this on themselves by creating a complex and user-hostile bug reporting system.  It seems to me that they could have offered this person a job or a contract, because Eclipse has been amazingly effective at uncovering high-severity exploits. Also, Eclipse could…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48329562&quot; title=&quot;I know this is a crazy take. But I go feel so down trodden by many many tech corps these days I find it hard not to have a smidge of satisfaction for this guy pointing out the colossal favour research developers do for them by responsible disclosure. That said, I feel bad for the inevitable victims of exploitation and also I am certain he will end up criminalized or as per usual the law will enforce a large corps will against him. Yes. Definitely a Friday night after a hard week take.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that Microsoft’s vast resources should be used to proactively discover these flaws, others suggest that only legal liability for defective software will force a change in corporate behavior &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48331127&quot; title=&quot;Attacking the messenger is an age-old trend in the bug reporting arena. Microsoft has the backing of many governments, and has access to the best legal teams possible, leaving this guy in a world of hurt. Microsoft seems to have brought this on themselves by creating a complex and user-hostile bug reporting system.  It seems to me that they could have offered this person a job or a contract, because Eclipse has been amazingly effective at uncovering high-severity exploits. Also, Eclipse could…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48330767&quot; title=&quot;It is not all about money, but microsoft had a net income of 101 billion last year, and a 36% profit margin. I am not saying humans or AI can create &amp;#39;perfect&amp;#39; software, but NASA has shown there is a HUGE gap between what can be achieved and what commercial software has generally done. We have given software a pass on the liability for the damage it can caused when it is defective for too long, that&amp;#39;s the only way to change this, it must hit the bottom line.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical discussions also focused on the vulnerabilities of BitLocker and TPMs, noting that sniffing encryption keys is relatively inexpensive and that more robust security requires remote attestation or third-party preboot protectors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48330046&quot; title=&quot;I read a little about BitLocker. It seems to store the encryption key in TPM and acquire it automatically after boot. I wonder, can encryption key be extracted by inserting a rogue PCIe card and reading it from memory, or by inserting a rogue DDR memory card with a backdoor to read the key from it, or by sniffing CPU - TPM bus?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48330132&quot; title=&quot;Sniffing the TPM&amp;#39;s been available for quite some time, actually - and quite cheap! https://pulsesecurity.co.nz/articles/TPM-sniffing The best way would be to arguably keep the key completely off the TPM and use remote attestation. There&amp;#39;s some preboot products out there like WinMagic SecureDoc* that use a little Linux partition, spin up just enough to get a network connection up to a remote server, provide authentication services, and then send the Bitlocker key down, unlock the partition, and…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48330255&quot; title=&quot;Something I&amp;#39;ve never understood about TPM attestation, is what happens if you plug the TPM into a microcontroller and give it all the same measurements that it would normally receive during a normal boot? Would that let you spoof attestations?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Amidst these conflicts, the high gray-market value of exploits—reaching up to $2 million for iOS—continues to complicate the ethics and logistics of responsible disclosure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48331730&quot; title=&quot;Now iOS 0-day is worth up to $2,000,000 on gray market so Apple kind a take it seriously.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48331809&quot; title=&quot;If you find a real iOS zero day that you think has a market value of 2 million, how do you (a) find a legit buyer for it, and (b) ensure you get paid, presumably in your own choice of cryptocurrency?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-28</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-28</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-8&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Claude Opus 4.8&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (anthropic.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48311647&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1758 points&lt;/strong&gt; · &lt;strong&gt;1363 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by craigmart&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic has launched Claude Opus 4.8, an upgraded model featuring improved reasoning, coding, and agentic reliability at the same price as its predecessor. The update introduces &amp;#34;dynamic workflows&amp;#34; for large-scale coding and &amp;#34;effort control&amp;#34; settings, allowing users to choose between faster responses or deeper thinking for complex tasks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-8&quot; title=&quot;Title: Introducing Claude Opus 4.8    URL Source: https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-8    Markdown Content:  We’re upgrading Claude Opus to a new version: Claude Opus 4.8. It builds on Opus 4.7 with improvements across benchmarks, and is a more effective collaborator. It’s available today for the same price.    Opus 4.8 launches alongside several new features. Users on claude.ai now have control over the amount of effort Claude puts into a task. Claude Code has a new “dynamic workflows”…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of Claude Opus 4.8 has sparked debate over whether frontier model improvements are becoming &amp;#34;illegible&amp;#34; to users, with some finding it difficult to perceive gains over previous versions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48311998&quot; title=&quot;A rambling comment: I think this is the first time we&amp;#39;ve had a third minor version bump on a frontier Anthropic model. (I count the 0.5s as major here, because they&amp;#39;ve been issued non-sequentially and also corresponded to massive capability leaps, eg, Sonnet 3.5, Opus 4.5). So now the Opus 4.5 family has successors 4.6, 4.7, and 4.8, each posting fairly modest claimed gains. My own experience w/ 4.6 and 4.7 are that I don&amp;#39;t firmly grasp any capabilities improvements over my memory of 4.5, but…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users report tangible progress in complex coding tasks and spatial reasoning in image generation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48311979&quot; title=&quot;I generated pelicans riding bicycles on both thinking level low and thinking level high: https://gist.github.com/simonw/68560eddb0b268a8417f80ceb7304... The high one is notably better - the bicycle frame is the correct shape, unlike thinking level low. For comparison, here&amp;#39;s Opus 4.7: https://gist.github.com/simonw/afcb19addf3f38eb1996e1ebe749c...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48313432&quot; title=&quot;My fav coding benchmark for frontier models is to build a simple RTS game in one file (js/html/css). Claude Code with Opus 4.8 in ultracode mode nailed it, the best result so far: https://bsky.app/profile/senko.net/post/3mmwnrkwboc2v The prompt was: Create a simple but functional real time strategy (RTS) game similar to old WarCraft, StarCraft or Command &amp;amp; Conquer games. The player should be able to build buildings, create units, gather resources and should uncover the whole map. No AI or…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that the era of massive parameter scaling may be ending in favor of smaller, more efficient models optimized through techniques like distillation or recursive reasoning &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48312244&quot; title=&quot;I won&amp;#39;t be surprised if the next gen frontier models are the last. There&amp;#39;s orders of magnitude of low hanging juice to squeeze out of smaller models. It is almost guaranteed that a 60-90B model can outperform current SOTA in coding tasks within 2-3 years (design not certain, probably unlikely). It is far less clear that a 1.2T model will be meaningfully better enough to justify training it. As far as reasoning is concerned, with the recent GRAM release, there may be 4 orders of magnitude of…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48312751&quot; title=&quot;Took me a while to find what you were referring to by gram. Arxiv paper from 9 days ago that&amp;#39;s not properly indexed by search engines. (G)enerative (R)ecursive re(A)soning (M)odels. They really wanted the acronym. https://arxiv.org/html/2605.19376v1&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48312364&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;It is almost guaranteed that a 60-90B model can outperform current SOTA in coding tasks within 2-3 years. I don&amp;#39;t disagree, but how much of this ends up being distillation? I can&amp;#39;t help but imagine that 4.8 was probably trained in part by leveraging Mythos. If the very large models turn out to be very expensive to run relative to the benefits, it&amp;#39;s possible that they could end up still being trained, but ultimately used as a tool to create smaller models that are nearly as effective. I&amp;#39;m…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, there is significant interest in the upcoming &amp;#34;Mythos&amp;#34; class of models, though some observers find Anthropic’s tendency to describe these systems as &amp;#34;species&amp;#34; or potentially sentient beings to be increasingly surreal &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48311730&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; One of the most prominent improvements in Opus 4.8 is its honesty Anthropic talks about their own models as if they&amp;#39;re discovering new species in the wild...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48311887&quot; title=&quot;Many involved genuinely believe these things are sentient[0][1]. Which honestly makes all of this even more insane because they are creating sentient entities and promptly enslaving them. 0: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/02/16/what-is-claude... 1: https://www.404media.co/anthropic-exec-forces-ai-chatbot-on-... (this one is rather biased however the quotes clearly indicate what I’m stating)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48311816&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;  Not only that, but we plan to release a new class of model with even higher intelligence than Opus. As part of Project Glasswing, a small number of organizations are currently using Claude Mythos Preview for cybersecurity work. Models of this capability level require stronger cyber safeguards before they can be generally released. We’re making swift progress on developing these safeguards and expect to be able to bring Mythos-class models to all our customers in the coming weeks. Probably…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mlsu.io/posts/day-off/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Can we have the day off?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mlsu.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48302745&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1399 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 774 comments · by mlsu&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that if AI significantly increases white-collar productivity as predicted, workers and executives should be granted a four-day workweek to enjoy the benefits of that efficiency. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mlsu.io/posts/day-off/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Can we have the day off?    URL Source: https://mlsu.io/posts/day-off/    Published Time: Thu, 28 May 2026 00:39:29 GMT    Markdown Content:  May &amp;#39;26    So, apparently we are at the cusp of the entire world’s white collar workforce (and, by extension, much of the US workforce) undergoing a revolution in productivity. AI is the technology that is going to revolutionize the way we work, the way we interact with the world, the way we learn, the way we socialize, and all of this. This sounds great.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the frustration that AI-driven productivity gains are unlikely to benefit workers through higher pay or reduced hours, as historical precedents with computers and the internet show that efficiency surpluses are typically captured by those in power &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48302955&quot; title=&quot;This article is kind of playful, but I think there’s a serious point here that’s not discussed enough. We’re being asked to usher in huge productivity gains by introducing AI to our workflows, but we’re not asking how does it help us? Not a lot of us stand to directly gain from our employers becoming more productive. I know everybody is afraid of getting fired and replaced with AI or whatever right now. But we should be seriously asking in our next all hands meetings if 10x’ing our productivity…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48303659&quot; title=&quot;Whenever a new way is found to improve efficiency, choices have to be made about how to distribute the new surplus. Choices are made by people who have power and imposed upon people who don&amp;#39;t. The people with power under current systems don&amp;#39;t care about the people who do the work. They care about getting rich. So if there&amp;#39;s an efficiency gain to be had, all of that new efficiency is going to be put towards increasing output or reallocating work. None of it - under current power structures -…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48302991&quot; title=&quot;My dad was a stock broker in the late 1970s and remembers when most of trading was 100% manual and firms actually had &amp;#39;runners&amp;#39; who would take stock certificates back and forth between trading firms. He has this great quote about when computers came out: &amp;#39;We were told &amp;#39;computers will save you so much time on work tasks that you won&amp;#39;t even know what to do with your free time&amp;#39;. I spent the next 30 years working the same number of hours. &amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that a four-day work week is a &amp;#34;prisoner&amp;#39;s dilemma&amp;#34; where individual ambition undermines collective leisure, others suggest that meaningful change requires collective bargaining or political action to address the decoupling of output from compensation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48303060&quot; title=&quot;The four day work week is a prisoner&amp;#39;s dilemma. If everyone did it, then we&amp;#39;d all get a payoff, but if someone defects to a longer work week they tend to get ahead at work. Thus we all do it and thus we all lose. It&amp;#39;s funny how underappreciated it is how the five day work week is powered by norms...at least in the US. People assume there are laws about it. The only laws dictate compensation past certain thresholds, and in the case of well paid knowledge workers those don&amp;#39;t even tend to apply.…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48303680&quot; title=&quot;Unless one choses to bargain. Perhaps collectively.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48303896&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand why people make these hyperbolic jokes about guillotines. Violence is counterproductive; and not practical anyway. Joking about it just makes you feel great without actually doing anything. There is a simple alternative. Vote; and educate your family and friends. If you don&amp;#39;t know what is on the ballot in the midterms, you are part of the problem. If you aren&amp;#39;t starting a family conversation about how corporations are squeezing us, you are part of the problem.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a sharp disagreement over whether technological progress has actually improved society, with some noting that despite massive efficiency gains, the cost of living has risen to a point where a single income can no longer support a family &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48303453&quot; title=&quot;Computers and the Internet ushered in huge productivity gains. Despite many people losing their jobs as a result, it&amp;#39;s tough to argue society isn&amp;#39;t better off. I think that&amp;#39;s the key difference with AI, though. It&amp;#39;s not like I&amp;#39;m losing my job, but at least I have a robot at home that cleans the house and does my laundry. People are having their livelihoods threatened while their utility bills go up because of datacenters, and the only substantive impact in their personal lives is that now they…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48303472&quot; title=&quot;Is society better off? Honest question, you used to be able to support a family of four with a single 9-5.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mybricklog.com/blog/bricks-minifigs-corporate-stole-old-mans-200000-lego-collection&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bricks and Minifigs Stole a Man&amp;#39;s $200k Lego Collection&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mybricklog.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314136&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1352 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 613 comments · by philips&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bricks &amp;amp; Minifigs corporate and a Salem franchise are accused of refusing to return a $200,000 LEGO collection held on consignment. Despite a court ruling in the owner&amp;#39;s favor, the store closed without paying, while a YouTuber documenting the dispute faced police harassment and arrest. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mybricklog.com/blog/bricks-minifigs-corporate-stole-old-mans-200000-lego-collection&quot; title=&quot;Title: Bricks &amp;amp; Minifigs Stole a Man&amp;#39;s $200,000 LEGO Collection    URL Source: https://mybricklog.com/blog/bricks-minifigs-corporate-stole-old-mans-200000-lego-collection    Published Time: 2026-05-26 13:04:50    Markdown Content:  Ed Mansell built the largest personal LEGO Star Wars collection in history. Over $200,000 worth of sets, years of his life. Bricks &amp;amp; Minifigs is trying to steal his collection.    Ed Mansell spent years building what many believe to be the largest personal LEGO Star Wars…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The dispute centers on a $200k Lego collection held on consignment by a franchise that was subsequently seized by its parent company, Bricks &amp;amp; Minifigs (BAM), which then allegedly refused to honor the original contract &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314983&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m really confused by this blog. There seems to be a large portion of the story missing. I can&amp;#39;t figure out the correlation between the owner losing their franchise and the rest of the story. Why did they want to steal the sets? If they&amp;#39;re really a $400M company (whatever that means), why would they do this over (at most) $200k? I couldn&amp;#39;t figure out what is being claimed here. I&amp;#39;m not saying it&amp;#39;s not true, I just can&amp;#39;t follow the story at all. EDIT: After reading other sources, it seems that…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315037&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not that hard to understand. A man gave a store merchandise on consignment, signed a contract with the store manager. The manager lost control of the store to corporate.  The goods were still there, still on display and being sold. Corporate says, &amp;#39;this is mine now&amp;#39; and refuses to honor the contract.  &amp;#39;It wasn&amp;#39;t our name on it, says right here that the previous store manager signed this, and she&amp;#39;s no longer with us.&amp;#39;  They sell the goods and keep all of the revenue, rather than just their…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users question why a large company would risk its reputation over this amount, others point to potential &amp;#34;Mormon mafia&amp;#34; corruption involving local law enforcement and BYU alumni &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315916&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Bricks &amp;amp; Minifigs CEO Ammon McNeff is a graduate of Brigham Young University. Joshua Johnson and Brandon Best are, by public record and documented account, members of the LDS community. When Reckless Ben&amp;#39;s team, following the pattern of obstruction by local law enforcement, looked into the individual officers involved in these incidents, they found that multiple officers were also BYU alumni. I thought “it has to be some kind of corruption here”. And yup it’s the mormon mafia apparently&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315453&quot; title=&quot;Can anyone explain WHY a 400M company would do this? This is just bonkers. They are destroying their reputation for $200k of legos???&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315021&quot; title=&quot;The part 2 video where the police harass and falsely arrest ben is even more shocking.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Disagreements exist regarding the facts, with some noting that BAM claims the inventory was not fully discoverable and that the owner&amp;#39;s failure to use a lawyer complicated the resolution &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315518&quot; title=&quot;Forgive me if I&amp;#39;m trying to figure out what&amp;#39;s going on here. I just read the linked blog and some of the links within, but I don&amp;#39;t have time to watch all these long YouTube videos &amp;gt;  The goods were still there, still on display and being sold. The store says the full inventory was not discoverable at the store. They said the person gave a written statement in the past saying the collection was &amp;#39;moved off site for security reasons&amp;#39; so I don&amp;#39;t think this is really as cut and dry as the YouTuber…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315174&quot; title=&quot;This guy tried to resolve a legal dispute without a lawyer. Any competent business lawyer should have been able to straighten this out within days. He even tried to do process service himself, which nobody does. You pay a process server $100 or so for that.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-05-27/uc-math-professors-demand-return-of-sat-for-stem-admissions&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Citing &amp;#39;severe&amp;#39; math deficits, UC faculty demand a return to SAT tests for STEM&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (latimes.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48309233&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;646 points · &lt;strong&gt;858 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by brandonb&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More than 600 University of California faculty members are urging the system to reinstate SAT/ACT requirements for STEM majors by 2027, citing severe math deficits and a lack of student preparedness following six years of test-free admissions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-05-27/uc-math-professors-demand-return-of-sat-for-stem-admissions&quot; title=&quot;Title: University of California math professors demand return of SAT for STEM admissions - Los Angeles Times    URL Source: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-05-27/uc-math-professors-demand-return-of-sat-for-stem-admissions    Published Time: 2026-05-27T22:31:16.418Z    Markdown Content:  # University of California math professors demand return of SAT for STEM admissions - Los Angeles Times    *     [News](https://www.latimes.com/)        *   [Home Page](https://www.latimes.com/)      *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;UC faculty report that the removal of standardized testing has masked severe math deficits, forcing professors to reteach middle-school concepts to college students &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48309335&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; “We now observe preparation gaps so severe that instructors must reteach middle-school mathematics while simultaneously teaching the material students need for sciences, engineering, economics, and other quantitatively demanding fields,” they warned. i dont understand why the teachers would go out of their way to reteach middle-school math. i teach. my courses have prerequisites. if a student somehow makes it into my class without a passing-grade grasp of the prerequisites, i will point them…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48309289&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;The surge in math deficiencies after dropping the SAT highlights a systemic issue: grade inflation. Without a standardized baseline like the SAT/ACT, a 4.0 GPA from a high school with relaxed standards looks identical to a 4.0 from a highly rigorous one. Paradoxically, removing test requirements harms underprivileged students the most. Preparing for the SAT requires a book and an internet connection. In contrast, building a competitive profile based entirely on expensive extracurriculars,…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters attribute this decline to &amp;#34;equity-focused&amp;#34; policies that discourage advanced tracks like calculus, as well as a push for classroom digitization that often serves as a distraction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48309651&quot; title=&quot;This doesn&amp;#39;t surprise me at all.  From what I can tell, California&amp;#39;s education system has moved from &amp;#39;equality&amp;#39; (which I would define as providing similar opportunities to all the kids) to focusing on &amp;#39;equity&amp;#39; (which I think they define as dictating the same outcome for all kids). To get an idea of how off the rails this has gotten, go read up on their statements trying to justify banning high school calculus.  They explicitly (in the abstract / introduction of their plan) reject the idea that…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48309521&quot; title=&quot;I used to teach high school math. There was a big push for doing everything digitally. And admittedly, for some topics the use of technology in the classroom or at home can really be a benefit, for instance visualizations or interactive exercises. But having a digital device in class was the number one cause of distraction every time. For a lot of things, good old blackboards are just fine as are pen + paper exercises. Maybe even for most high school math. That was frowned upon though by the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest tying school funding to student outcomes or expanding charter schools, others argue this would unfairly penalize schools in low-income areas and encourage the &amp;#34;gaming&amp;#34; of the system by ejecting struggling students &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48310535&quot; title=&quot;This is absurdly problematic. Your solution is basically handicapping the schools with kids that perform worse and then potentially closing them? That doesn&amp;#39;t solve the problem, this is just pro-Charter School propaganda that ignores the real-world effects of these positions. You&amp;#39;ve identified a real issue with the &amp;#39;equality&amp;#39; vs &amp;#39;equity&amp;#39; concept, that doesn&amp;#39;t lead to &amp;#39;Close public schools and switch everything to Charter schools&amp;#39;, that&amp;#39;s an absurd conclusion.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48310161&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Personally, I think all funding in California education (other than terminal levels like 4 year bachelors and up) should be a function of the percentage of students that succeed at the next step. This has the unintended consequence of encouraging schools to eject students who are struggling. For example, if the student has a learning disability, declare that it&amp;#39;s too serious for them to handle, and then transfer them to a school that theoretically can. The system gets gamified and the &amp;#39;top&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48309732&quot; title=&quot;Measuring (and funding) schools based on student outcome is fraught because a student&amp;#39;s performance / preparedness for the &amp;#39;next level&amp;#39; is not entirely a function of the school. There are other significant parameters, including parental upbringing, home life stability, neighborhood safety, friends, hunger/nutrition, various trauma and abuse, the list goes on. I&amp;#39;m sure it&amp;#39;s been studied, but I&amp;#39;d bet &amp;#39;school quality&amp;#39; is not even close to number 1 on the list of predictors of educational outcome.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, there is a strong sentiment that standardized tests, despite their flaws, act as a necessary objective equalizer against grade inflation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48309289&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;The surge in math deficiencies after dropping the SAT highlights a systemic issue: grade inflation. Without a standardized baseline like the SAT/ACT, a 4.0 GPA from a high school with relaxed standards looks identical to a 4.0 from a highly rigorous one. Paradoxically, removing test requirements harms underprivileged students the most. Preparing for the SAT requires a book and an internet connection. In contrast, building a competitive profile based entirely on expensive extracurriculars,…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lenz.io/research/llm-disagreement&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Disagreement among frontier LLMs on real-world fact-checks&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lenz.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48307887&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;505 points · 345 comments · by kostaj&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A study by Lenz Research found that five top frontier AI models disagreed on 67% of 1,000 real-world fact-checking claims, with 34% of cases involving substantive contradictions rather than minor nuances. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lenz.io/research/llm-disagreement&quot; title=&quot;Title: Beyond Benchmarks: Disagreement Among Frontier LLMs on Real-World Fact-Checks    URL Source: https://lenz.io/research/llm-disagreement    Published Time: 2026-05-21    Markdown Content:  Lenz Research · Snapshot v1.0 · data as of May 21, 2026    67%    of real fact-checks, top AI models don&amp;#39;t agree on the answer.    1,000 claims, rated by 5 frontier LLMs.    Jordanov, Kosta · Lenz Research · [kosta@lenz.io](mailto:kosta@lenz.io)    We presented 1,000 recent real user claims to the five top frontier LLMs…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Critics argue the study&amp;#39;s findings reflect an evaluation of flawed prompt engineering and ambiguous rubrics rather than fundamental factual disagreements between models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48308177&quot; title=&quot;Here&amp;#39;s the prompt they used: Classify this claim as of : &amp;#39; &amp;#39;      Output exactly one label: True,    Mostly True, Misleading, or False.    No explanations, no qualifiers. The claims look like this: https://lenz.io/research/llm-disagreement/data.csv I put that in Datasette Lite to make it easier to explore. Here&amp;#39;s an example of a disagreement: https://lite.datasette.io/?csv=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.simonwil... The claim was &amp;#39;All almonds are grown in the U.S. state of California.&amp;#39;. All but one model said…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48308266&quot; title=&quot;Without providing definitions of &amp;#39;True / Mostly True / Misleading / False&amp;#39; to each rater, I rate the article&amp;#39;s claim that &amp;#39;Only one verdict bucket can be correct per claim&amp;#39; as false . Something can be simultaneously &amp;#39;misleading&amp;#39; and either true or false. Which category should something go in if it&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;mostly false&amp;#39;? How much can something be wrong before it goes from &amp;#39;mostly true&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;false&amp;#39; (objectively, both have some part of the fact that is not true)? This is at least partly testing the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. The forced-choice methodology, which excluded &amp;#34;Unknown&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;Abstain&amp;#34; options, led to nonsensical results for unverifiable future events or subjective claims like the existence of extraterrestrial life &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48308812&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Extraterrestrial life exists somewhere in the universe.&amp;#39; GPT-5.4: Misleading Opus 4.7: Misleading Gemini 3: FALSE Gemini 3 (Retrieval): FALSE Sonar Pro: FALSE It&amp;#39;s a weird fact claim, because the ground truth is &amp;#39;nobody knows for sure&amp;#39; and that&amp;#39;s not one of the available options.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48308742&quot; title=&quot;Better options would have been &amp;#39;True&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;False&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;Unknown&amp;#39; (which opinions would fall under too). That also includes an interesting assessment of how well LLMs can identify missing information. My guess is they would be a very low number of &amp;#39;unknown&amp;#39; and a much higher level of agreement (assuming equal representation). Unless the RLHF techniques have gotten better at getting an LLM to say &amp;#39;I don&amp;#39;t know&amp;#39;, which I doubt. Saying &amp;#39;I don&amp;#39;t know&amp;#39; is not good for a dopamine release to keep users coming…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48308792&quot; title=&quot;Tried initially with a fifth bucket, Abstain. It was actually heavily used by some of the models. But it felt as if they are using this to &amp;#39;avoid&amp;#39; some of the hard questions, and we dropped this bucket to force them to provide a verdict.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, commenters noted that the overlapping definitions of &amp;#34;Mostly True&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;Misleading&amp;#34; likely inflated the reported disagreement rates, as these labels lack standardized definitions across different model architectures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48308266&quot; title=&quot;Without providing definitions of &amp;#39;True / Mostly True / Misleading / False&amp;#39; to each rater, I rate the article&amp;#39;s claim that &amp;#39;Only one verdict bucket can be correct per claim&amp;#39; as false . Something can be simultaneously &amp;#39;misleading&amp;#39; and either true or false. Which category should something go in if it&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;mostly false&amp;#39;? How much can something be wrong before it goes from &amp;#39;mostly true&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;false&amp;#39; (objectively, both have some part of the fact that is not true)? This is at least partly testing the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48308421&quot; title=&quot;Yes, the labels are weird. Most misleading statements are true. Any &amp;#39;mostly true&amp;#39; statement is false. I suspect the intention was &amp;#39;Factually true, and no gotchas exist&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;technically not true, but so close to the truth that the difference doesn&amp;#39;t matter&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;technically true, but there are major gotchas&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;factually false and not even close&amp;#39;. But that&amp;#39;s not what they specified&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48307899&quot; title=&quot;Author here. 67% (95% CI 64–70%) of 1,000 recent real user claims to a fact-checking platform had at least one of GPT-5.4, Claude Opus 4.7, Gemini 3 Pro, Gemini 3 Pro+Search, and Sonar Pro dissent from the panel majority — or no majority formed at all. Panel-level Krippendorff&amp;#39;s α (ordinal) = 0.639, i.e. nontrivial but limited agreement. Quick context on what&amp;#39;s in the writeup and what isn&amp;#39;t: - What&amp;#39;s measured: parsed-label agreement between the 5 models. Forced 4-choice (True / Mostly True /…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/cyber-security/microsofts-github-bans-security-researcher-who-posted-zero-day-windows-exploits-because-company-ruined-their-life-expert-claims-action-is-vindictive-and-promises-further-retaliation&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GitHub bans security researcher who posted zero-day Windows exploits&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tomshardware.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315968&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;560 points · 252 comments · by possibilistic&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft-owned GitHub banned security researcher Nightmare-Eclipse after they published several Windows zero-day exploits, following a dispute over unpaid bug bounties and alleged retaliation that has led the researcher to promise further disclosures. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/cyber-security/microsofts-github-bans-security-researcher-who-posted-zero-day-windows-exploits-because-company-ruined-their-life-expert-claims-action-is-vindictive-and-promises-further-retaliation&quot; title=&quot;Microsoft&amp;#39;s GitHub bans security researcher who posted zero-day Windows exploits because company &amp;#39;ruined their life&amp;#39; — expert claims action is vindictive and promises further retaliation    &amp;#39;I will make sure your bones are shattered [on July 14]&amp;#39;    ![](https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p/?c1=2&amp;amp;c2=10055482&amp;amp;cv=4.4.0&amp;amp;cj=1)    [Skip to main content](#main)    Unlock world-class roadmaps &amp;amp; trusted Bench data.  See More    ×    ## Unparalleled insights. Industry analysis. Insider access.    **Tom&amp;#39;s Hardware**…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on a security researcher who was banned from both GitHub and GitLab after releasing zero-day Windows exploits, leading some to speculate about a personal vendetta against Microsoft &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317033&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s the backstory on this researcher? They seem to have a personal vendetta against Microsoft and thus releasing zero days that he found with the help of AI? Seems like the gold rush period is over for bounty hunters and its more about who has access to hardware/token capital.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48316950&quot; title=&quot;Is there any public word from Microsoft about what is going on here? Why would both Microsoft and Gitlab ban the user? I thought both platforms allowed hosting exploits and security research as long as everything is clearly marked up-front, I&amp;#39;m guessing some rules were broken?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48316673&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; forcing them to pack up and move shop to GitLab instead. https://gitlab.com/nightmare-eclipse Blocked user  @nightmare-eclipse Looks like they’re banned on GitLab as as well?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that Microsoft will regret the ban if it pushes researchers to sell exploits elsewhere, others point out that major tech companies are generally incentivized to pay bounties rather than withhold them vindictively &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317318&quot; title=&quot;No idea what&amp;#39;s happening here, but the First Rule Of Major Bug Bounty Programs is that everybody involved on the vendor side is actively incentivized to pay out. In many cases, there are people whose internal metrics depend on payouts. Payouts are causes for celebration in these programs. Microsoft is almost certainly[†] not trying to save money by screwing over bounty claimants. This might not be true of small companies (and is a reason why small companies shouldn&amp;#39;t run bug bounty programs),…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48316746&quot; title=&quot;I can’t help but feel  Microsoft will regret this. Guy finds zero days and gets no compensation. Instead gets banned. Guy sells zero days elsewhere.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. The researcher&amp;#39;s behavior has been described as &amp;#34;unhinged,&amp;#34; and the fact that multiple platforms issued bans suggests specific rules regarding exploit hosting may have been violated &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48316704&quot; title=&quot;Researcher seems a bit unhinged.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48316950&quot; title=&quot;Is there any public word from Microsoft about what is going on here? Why would both Microsoft and Gitlab ban the user? I thought both platforms allowed hosting exploits and security research as long as everything is clearly marked up-front, I&amp;#39;m guessing some rules were broken?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317622&quot; title=&quot;But the story is supposedly about him posting the zero-day exploits, not selling them. It’s in the title. He also got banned from Gitlab, which isn’t related to Microsoft at all.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/news/series-h&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Anthropic raises $65B in Series H funding at $965B post-money valuation&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (anthropic.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48313048&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;362 points · &lt;strong&gt;427 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by meetpateltech&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic has raised $65 billion in Series H funding at a $965 billion valuation to expand its compute capacity, advance safety research, and scale its Claude AI platform for global enterprise customers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/news/series-h&quot; title=&quot;Title: Anthropic raises $65B in Series H funding at $965B post-money valuation    URL Source: https://www.anthropic.com/news/series-h    Markdown Content:  Anthropic has raised $65 billion in Series H funding led by Altimeter Capital, Dragoneer, Greenoaks, and Sequoia Capital, valuing the company at $965 billion post-money.    Global enterprises across industries are deploying Claude in their core operations, and a growing number of people around the world use it for their everyday work. Since our…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic’s rapid ascent to a $965 billion valuation is driven by &amp;#34;unfathomable&amp;#34; revenue growth, jumping from a $9 billion run-rate in late 2025 to $47 billion by May 2026 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315752&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Since our Series G in February, adoption has continued to grow across global enterprise customers, and our run-rate revenue crossed $47 billion earlier this month. OK, so their self-reported run-rate revenue hit $47bn in early May. For comparison: Apr 6th 2026: https://www.anthropic.com/news/google-broadcom-partnership-c... - &amp;#39;Demand from Claude customers has accelerated in 2026. Our run-rate revenue has now surpassed $30 billion—up from approximately $9 billion at the end of 2025.&amp;#39; So that&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48316568&quot; title=&quot;Pretty unfathomable growth. I&amp;#39;m pretty sure I listened to Dario saying something along the lines of keeping Anthropic on track for 10x ARR growth (in December) and thinking that that was a bonkers idea for a $9B run-rate company, and now it&amp;#39;s looking like that might be an underestimate ...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users credit this success to superior branding and a period of dominance in coding models, others argue that OpenAI remains a fierce competitor and that Anthropic’s recent enterprise pricing changes may eventually slow this momentum &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48313445&quot; title=&quot;Probably the bigger headline here is that they’ve blown past OpenAI in revenue and valuation, with OpenAI looking increasingly shaky and vulnerable.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314024&quot; title=&quot;Their valuations differ by about 13%. That&amp;#39;s close enough that I wouldn&amp;#39;t call it &amp;#39;blown past&amp;#39;. Things change fast in this space. Anthropic had a big boost from having the premier coding model for a while, but GPT-5.5 has closed that gap at a time when a lot of Anthropic customers are looking for cheaper alternatives. Anthropic is coming off of a recent change to their enterprise billing that substantially changed the pricing for many users. They were smart to do the fundraising before the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314418&quot; title=&quot;The branding of Claude is so much stronger than ChatGPT. Even Anthropic is such better branding than OpenAI (especially considering they&amp;#39;re not open at all). My wife knows about Claude because that&amp;#39;s what I use and we pay for. She uses it also as a result. And inevitably she will talk about Claude to her friends.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Skepticism persists regarding the legitimacy of these &amp;#34;self-reported&amp;#34; figures, with critics questioning how the current market of software engineers could possibly generate such high token demand &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317261&quot; title=&quot;Personally, I’m just exhausted. They are not obligated to be truthful here, so the entire thing is interpreted based on vibes. If you are an AI booster, this is proof that the demand is there; if you aren’t, you’re baffled at where these numbers are coming from.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48316723&quot; title=&quot;According to estimates, there are 4.4 million software engineers in the US. Let&amp;#39;s assume generously 10 million in the West in total. Then everyone of these would need to spend $400 per month on tokens. I don&amp;#39;t know how much killing girls in Minab pays, but it looks like there is a lot of fake revenue reported here.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, there is significant concern that private investors are extracting all potential upside from these &amp;#34;trillion-dollar&amp;#34; startups, leaving retail investors with little growth potential&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1k2ydn1rz8o&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;EU fines Temu €200M for allowing sale of illegal products&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bbc.co.uk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48309302&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;350 points · &lt;strong&gt;395 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by jjp&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The European Union has fined Chinese retailer Temu €200 million for failing to prevent the sale of illegal and dangerous products, including faulty chargers and hazardous baby toys, on its platform. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1k2ydn1rz8o&quot; title=&quot;EU fines Temu €200m for allowing sale of illegal products    The European Commission says the Chinese-owned online retailer failed to take account of risks from baby toys and faulty chargers sold on its platform.    [BBC Homepage](https://www.bbc.com)    * [Skip to content](#main-heading)  * [Accessibility Help](https://www.bbc.co.uk/accessibility/)    * [Your account](https://account.bbc.com/account?lang=en-GB&amp;amp;ptrt=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bbc.co.uk%2Fnews%2Farticles%2Fc1k2ydn1rz8o)    *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users argue Temu fills a vital market gap by bypassing high-margin local intermediaries for essential goods like electronics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48310619&quot; title=&quot;Say what you may of Temu, and I do think more vetting of certain goods is a good idea, but they fill a very real need. In the part of Europe where I live, the choice is only between intermediaries for the same products coming from China. The local intermediaries sell a very limited picking at staggering margins. And when it comes to certain things, like electronic components, the choice is between importing (old) American stock with a German company as the intermediary, and that&amp;#39;s $$$$ and many…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48310692&quot; title=&quot;yes, i&amp;#39;m very in favor of the shift towards direct-to-consumer among chinese retailers, but that might be because i&amp;#39;m not actually all that sympathetic to small business&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the platform&amp;#39;s lack of vetting for dangerous items like chargers and toys necessitates strict regulation or outright bans &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48312569&quot; title=&quot;But I still think chargers and children&amp;#39;s toys are exactly where the line should be drawn&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48309657&quot; title=&quot;I am very pro free market, but Temu with data harvesting and selling illegal projects should be banned together with tiktok...&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant debate over enforcement, with some questioning why illegal imports aren&amp;#39;t blocked at the border &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48309677&quot; title=&quot;Isn&amp;#39;t there some kind of law to disallow imports without a CE / RoHS / etc label? Why allow it to enter the EU, and then fine the seller afterwards?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; and others noting that local budget stores often sell the same low-quality, rebranded products at higher prices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48313493&quot; title=&quot;If you ban Temu chargers, people will go to stores to buy the cheapest ones which are identical to the ones on Temu, just for 10x the price. Edit: Reply to Scroll_Swe as I am rate-limited to posting new comments. The chargers in budget stores are identical to Temu chargers are are frequently recalled.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48309749&quot; title=&quot;Are you suggesting opening every package to check for a CE? I think fining after the fact is how those laws are enforced.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, skeptics view the €200M fine as a mere &amp;#34;penny slap&amp;#34; that is unlikely to change the company&amp;#39;s behavior &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48310478&quot; title=&quot;Big corp penny slap on the fingers. I dont this amount will change behaviour or incentive to make larger profit.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/28/new-york-mamdani-pied-a-terre-tax-passes.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;New York passes pied-a-terre tax&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cnbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48309584&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;278 points · &lt;strong&gt;438 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by proofofcontempt&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;New York state lawmakers passed a &amp;#34;pied-a-terre&amp;#34; tax on nonprimary residences in New York City valued at $1 million or more to help close a budget gap, a move expected to significantly increase property tax bills for wealthy luxury apartment owners starting in 2026. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/28/new-york-mamdani-pied-a-terre-tax-passes.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: New York passes Mamdani&amp;#39;s pied-a-terre tax. Here&amp;#39;s who pays and how much    URL Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/28/new-york-mamdani-pied-a-terre-tax-passes.html    Published Time: 2026-05-28T13:35:40+0000    Markdown Content:  # New York passes Mamdani&amp;#39;s pied-a-terre tax. Who pays and how much    [Skip Navigation](https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/28/new-york-mamdani-pied-a-terre-tax-passes.html#MainContent)    [![Image 3: CNBC…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new pied-à-terre tax is viewed by some as a practical wealth tax that could improve housing liquidity, though others argue it functions more as a targeted housing policy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48310995&quot; title=&quot;Property tax is the workable wealth tax. There&amp;#39;s no such thing as a perfect policy, but in the context of NYC this seems worth trying. I&amp;#39;ll be interested to see if it helps create some liquidity in the housing market (the goal), or if it only functions as revenue source. One wrinkle I haven&amp;#39;t heard much discussion of -- cities respond to incentives too. NYC is a global destination for the mega wealthy. If it turns out the uber-rich don&amp;#39;t mind paying and this becomes a cash cow for the city,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48310862&quot; title=&quot;On unoccupied or secondary residences specifically, not on wealth overall. This is more of a housing policy?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While proponents suggest inheritance taxes are a fairer alternative, critics argue that taxing earned income or family legacies is morally wrong and discourages self-sufficiency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48311411&quot; title=&quot;The fairest and easiest to realize wealth tax is on inheritance. It is great to want to give your kids a headstart in the world, it is terrible for them and the people around them to set them up for life.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48311558&quot; title=&quot;I would disagree, I think income taxes and inheritance taxes are morally wrong. Earning money to support oneself and family instead of relying on public largesse should not be taxed. Passing the fruits of a lifetime of work to ones heirs so they can continue do productive work instead of relying on public largesse should not be taxed.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48311635&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Earning… Inheritance is, notably, not earning it. &amp;gt; continue do productive work That&amp;#39;s a pretty bald assertion. Useless nepo babies abound. &amp;gt; relying on public largesse Any chance the existence of a stable, well-educated, high-trust society benefits the children of wealthy people at all?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant point of contention is the $1 million threshold, which some claim is an outdated and arbitrary figure for the New York City real estate market &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48310875&quot; title=&quot;I think this is in the right direction, but the cut off at $1M is interesting. Why&amp;#39;s there an obsession with the $1m cutoff? The dollar has been turned to dust.  $1M is not that much money, especially in housing, especially in NYC. Why tax $1m second homes and not second homes generally?  Effectively, you&amp;#39;re going to tax almost all second homes. So why the arbitrary cutoff? Chicago wanted to add a &amp;#39;millionaire&amp;#39;s tax&amp;#39; on $1m+ home sales.  At least in Chicago, that isn&amp;#39;t effectively taxing the…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, commenters warn of potential second-order effects, such as the city becoming incentivized to cater to the ultra-wealthy for revenue or, conversely, driving capital away as seen in previous European wealth tax experiments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48310995&quot; title=&quot;Property tax is the workable wealth tax. There&amp;#39;s no such thing as a perfect policy, but in the context of NYC this seems worth trying. I&amp;#39;ll be interested to see if it helps create some liquidity in the housing market (the goal), or if it only functions as revenue source. One wrinkle I haven&amp;#39;t heard much discussion of -- cities respond to incentives too. NYC is a global destination for the mega wealthy. If it turns out the uber-rich don&amp;#39;t mind paying and this becomes a cash cow for the city,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48311344&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;  If it turns out the uber-rich don&amp;#39;t mind paying and this becomes a cash cow for the city, that creates incentives for the city to cater to them and try and get more uber-rich people to have second homes in the city. The tax is reasonably small enough that I wouldn&amp;#39;t expect a lot of wealthy people from divesting from their properties, but it&amp;#39;s probably going to make them think twice about buying new properties. That second-order effect is the important balancing act for any locality-based…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://shvbsle.in/various-llm-smells/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Various LLM Smells&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (shvbsle.in)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48313810&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;365 points · 290 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author identifies &amp;#34;LLM smells,&amp;#34; or recognizable patterns in AI-generated content, ranging from specific linguistic structures like repetitive punchlines and short sentences to recurring web design elements like JetBrains Mono fonts and specific button styles. &lt;a href=&quot;https://shvbsle.in/various-llm-smells/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Various LLM smells    URL Source: https://shvbsle.in/various-llm-smells/    Published Time: Fri, 29 May 2026 03:38:40 GMT    Markdown Content:  ## [Shiv After Dark](https://shvbsle.in/)  [Home](https://shvbsle.in/)[Blog](https://shvbsle.in/blog/)[Essays](https://shvbsle.in/essays/)[Notes](https://shvbsle.in/notes/)[About](https://shvbsle.in/about/)    _28 May, 2026_    _Looks like this ended up on the HN front-page:_[HN Thread](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48313810)    * * *    Late last year I…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the &amp;#34;Dunning-Kruger&amp;#34; effect of LLM usage, where users who lack expertise in a domain—such as prose or programming—mistakenly perceive AI output as superior to their own &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315309&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The LLM generated writing obviously felt significantly better than my own writing. A general pattern for LLMs is that they look really good at things you are bad at. What that means is that if you find yourself thinking of its output as significantly better than yours in a particular domain, there&amp;#39;s a high chance that you are not equipped to judge that quality effectively.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48316201&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; A general pattern for LLMs is that they look really good at things you are bad at. This is true for coding, too, which I think, to a large degree, might explain the polarized differences in opinions on HN about the quality of LLM-produced code. You have the 1. &amp;#39;AI produces code better than I could possibly write, one shots things it would take me days to do, and has made me 10X more productive!&amp;#39; camp, and you have the 2. &amp;#39;AI constantly produces poor code needing rework, makes mistakes, has to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that LLM writing is &amp;#34;atrocious&amp;#34; compared to even basic literature &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315365&quot; title=&quot;Honestly, I can&amp;#39;t fathom thinking that LLM writing is even remotely passable. People that think this should honestly read more. One book a month is hardly an aspirational goal. You don&amp;#39;t even have to read Melville or Hemingway or Chaucer or Shakespeare, just pick up any popular NYT best seller, and it&amp;#39;ll be significantly better than anything an LLM can generate.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend it remains a significant upgrade for the &amp;#34;average person&amp;#34; whose communication skills are declining &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315603&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I can&amp;#39;t fathom thinking that LLM writing is even remotely passable. People that think this should honestly read more. This makes me think you&amp;#39;re only exposing yourself to high quality writing online and from an intelligent circle of friends and coworkers. The average person&amp;#39;s reading and writing abilities are _atrocious_ and only getting worse. We&amp;#39;re almost at the point where kids are communicating through abbreviations and emojis exclusively. LLM prose is significantly better than what the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315688&quot; title=&quot;Are we also saying it&amp;#39;s acceptable to feed people junk because it&amp;#39;s better than what they would cook? At some point you&amp;#39;re just making bad excuses for false scarcity.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics highlight specific linguistic &amp;#34;smells,&amp;#34; such as repetitive structures and overused metaphors like &amp;#34;blast radius,&amp;#34; as clear indicators of AI generation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315567&quot; title=&quot;- “(The) honest caveat:” (or “genuine caveat:”, both with the colon) - “(The) honest answer:” (again, with colon) - “The thing to internalize:” - “The smoking gun:” (really, sentences that start with “The :” are a strong tell, but those four are the most prolific) - “load bearing” (when not talking about architecture) - “blast radius” (when not talking about actual explosives, but rather the effect of an event/action) - “smoke test” (esp. when “sanity check” is more apropos) - Lists of three…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48316058&quot; title=&quot;The LLM writing sameness is bad. Use LLMs to help your writing! But don&amp;#39;t include a word they generate, even just a vocabulary adjustment, in your own output. Have them critique structure and flow, spot overused words and passive constructions and dumb picks for topic sentences. It&amp;#39;s great for that, and those are all objective improvements in your writing that won&amp;#39;t mess up your style. The LLM sameness in web design is good. Most sites shouldn&amp;#39;t try to be idiosyncratic. The best design for a…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, a divide exists between those who view code as a functional tool where AI-generated boilerplate is acceptable and those who believe writing is a craft where &amp;#34;sameness&amp;#34; destroys the product&amp;#39;s value &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315818&quot; title=&quot;Tell me your thoughts on the quality of LLM-generated code. I&amp;#39;ve never understood this attitude where people are absolutely disgusted by the slightest whiff of AI prose but will happily slurp up AI-generated code by the bucketful and proudly proclaim that it&amp;#39;s OK because it&amp;#39;s better than the average developer can produce.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48316056&quot; title=&quot;The key difference is that code is not the end product, but writing is itself the product. (No one&amp;#39;s doing &amp;#39;vibe-product-management&amp;#39; for example.) Tbh, I still think code can have a beauty and elegance to it (like a logical proof can, or like a mathematical theorem can), but there&amp;#39;s a difference between the two and I&amp;#39;m way less forgiving of AI writing than I am of AI code, especially considering most code (by line count) is just boilerplate anyway.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nick.winans.io/blog/nice-nano/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I made a million dollar product from my dorm room (2025)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nick.winans.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314951&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;555 points · 90 comments · by mattrighetti&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nick Winans developed the nice!nano, a high-efficiency wireless microcontroller for DIY keyboards, during his freshman year of college, eventually selling over 50,000 units and generating more than $1 million in sales. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nick.winans.io/blog/nice-nano/&quot; title=&quot;Title: I Made a Million Dollar Product from My Dorm Room - Nick Winans    URL Source: https://nick.winans.io/blog/nice-nano/    Markdown Content:  2025-03-23   _This post shares the story of the [nice!nano](https://nicekeyboards.com/nice-nano/); a wireless, Pro Micro-compatible microcontroller board I made in my freshman year of college. The nice!nano powers tens of thousands of keyboards, has inspired many, and changed my life._    Over my first winter break in college, I created what I called the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights how a &amp;#34;profoundly niche&amp;#34; hardware product—a wireless component for DIY keyboards—can become a million-dollar business by capturing a tiny fraction of the global market &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48316794&quot; title=&quot;I admit, I barely understand what the product does, much less how there&amp;#39;s 50k people wanting this. This is a component you can use if you&amp;#39;re building a DIY keyboard and want to make it wireless? Seems profoundly niche to me. Am I missing something? Anyway, congrats on finding and reaching your market! The Internet at its best (although part of me wishes this nerd community had found a more self-hosted way of connecting online than Discord).&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317248&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Seems profoundly niche to me. Am I missing something? As someone who dreams of someday starting a &amp;#39;lifestyle business&amp;#39;, I love that it is profoundly niche. It gives me hope that I can go out and solve a problem that is important to me, but too niche for investors to bother with, and earn some money from it.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48318738&quot; title=&quot;There are billions of people in the world. 50k is 0.005% of a billion, so 1 in 20000. This is the reason I think money/market-motivated thinking, that often leaves people pursuing something they&amp;#39;re not especially personally enthusiastic about, is wrong for most people. If your goal is to be a billion dollar grow-fast multinational company, okay, but if your goal is to just live a comfortable life and create something neat - then it&amp;#39;s much better to sell a niche thing that you enjoy, than a mass…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The author attributes their success to a combination of &amp;#34;luck and timing&amp;#34; during COVID-19 lockdowns, specifically leveraging a viral Reddit post to build a dedicated Discord community and moving quickly to partner with vendors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48316590&quot; title=&quot;This is a really cool story. If the author is reading: It would be interesting to read about your experiences with marketing and building support for your products. I know you said a lot of it was luck and timing, but it would be helpful to get your thoughts on which moves you made that best took advantage of that luck and timing. I have dozens of friends who launched group buys for small boards around this price range for different niches that never took off. Some of them even had superior…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48316761&quot; title=&quot;Hey! I&amp;#39;m the author. I think my good timing and luck showed up mostly through my initial Reddit post garnering a ton of attention. I road that wave to the group buy. From that single Reddit post I had tons of people interested and got them to join a community Discord. Remember that this was right when covid lockdowns had started, seriously good timing for me. I worked hard to move fast, engage, and share often on my community Discord[1]. The early messages in the announcements channel might be…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters celebrate the viability of such lifestyle businesses &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317248&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Seems profoundly niche to me. Am I missing something? As someone who dreams of someday starting a &amp;#39;lifestyle business&amp;#39;, I love that it is profoundly niche. It gives me hope that I can go out and solve a problem that is important to me, but too niche for investors to bother with, and earn some money from it.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48318738&quot; title=&quot;There are billions of people in the world. 50k is 0.005% of a billion, so 1 in 20000. This is the reason I think money/market-motivated thinking, that often leaves people pursuing something they&amp;#39;re not especially personally enthusiastic about, is wrong for most people. If your goal is to be a billion dollar grow-fast multinational company, okay, but if your goal is to just live a comfortable life and create something neat - then it&amp;#39;s much better to sell a niche thing that you enjoy, than a mass…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others raise concerns regarding legal compliance, such as potential trademark disputes with clones and the necessity of FCC certification for radio devices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48316963&quot; title=&quot;neat product, but where&amp;#39;s the FCC ID for an intentional radiator on it? your million dollar product can afford the legally required testing, right?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48316753&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; both of these new boards that popped up are advertised as nice!nanos and are shipped with the exact same firmware I use on the nice!nano, so when someone plugs it in, it says it’s a nice!nano. Trademark dispute is the way to go. Since there were no stories about an onerous amount of returns of clones to the author, probably not worth it, but returns of clones is why it financially makes sense and not just to enrich lawyers.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hallucinate.site&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Hallucinate – Massively Multiplayer Online Rave&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (hallucinate.site)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304260&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;438 points · 199 comments · by stagas&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hallucinate is an open-source, massively multiplayer online rave platform that allows users to participate in a shared virtual music experience. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hallucinate.site&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;github.com&amp;amp;#x2F;stagas&amp;amp;#x2F;hallucinate&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;github.com&amp;amp;#x2F;stagas&amp;amp;#x2F;hallucinate&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users praised the project for capturing the anonymous, judgment-free &amp;#34;vibe&amp;#34; of early rave culture &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304743&quot; title=&quot;Very cool to vibe out with folks anonymously. Almost like the old days where you could go to a rave and be you without fear someone would take pictures or people outside the rave would know who you are. Would love an option to cycle skin colors / tones.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, though some noted the experience was immediately marred by racist slurs and a lack of moderation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48305240&quot; title=&quot;And it was immediately fouled by racism.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304884&quot; title=&quot;Looks like you have a serious moderation problem, there are racists running around using n-word racist slurs&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical feedback focused on the unusual IJKL control scheme &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48306679&quot; title=&quot;IJKL for movement instead WASD? An interesting approach...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, the need for a README &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304625&quot; title=&quot;Add a README file, bro&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, and suggestions for motion-tracking integration to allow for real dancing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304875&quot; title=&quot;I like it! but without ability to execute own dance moves, not really dancing... Tried with keyboard but it didn&amp;#39;t work.. Now imagining infrared webcam thing and some DIY stick on reflective things.. set up your own rave cave, attach sensors, dance, your virtual self mirrors... now you&amp;#39;re raving&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debated the necessity of drugs like MDMA for the authentic rave experience &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48308475&quot; title=&quot;The whole point of a rave is to take Molly and have fun connecting with others who have also taken Molly. At least for this introvert. I was never a fan of Electronic Music, I tolerate it for the drugs and the temporary extroversion.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48308618&quot; title=&quot;How do you get into raves, and how do you take &amp;#39;Molly&amp;#39; and connect with others who have taken &amp;#39;Molly&amp;#39;? (Speaking as an electronic music super-fan, but curious about having never listened to it outside of my personal-devices per-se).&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others shared similar past projects built for VR and vinyl DJing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48305812&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s cool to see things like this, I wasn&amp;#39;t aware of. I made something similar for VR around 6 or 7 years ago with full DJ mixing on real vinyl turntables. I got things built so DJs could play their set from anywhere in the world and have access to their music from their own studio or home etc. Unfortunately i was one guy making this and health issues have sadly put this project on hold indefinitely. It would be a shame to let it die like this and would love others to carry the project further.…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://llmgame.scalex.dev&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Continue? Y/N: A 60-second game about AI agent permission fatigue&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (llmgame.scalex.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48308376&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;382 points · 159 comments · by Wirbelwind&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#34;Continue? Y/N&amp;#34; is a 60-second browser game designed to demonstrate the risks of AI agent permission fatigue by testing how carefully players review automated commands before granting approval. &lt;a href=&quot;https://llmgame.scalex.dev&quot; title=&quot;Title: Continue? Y/N — How carefully do you read AI commands?    URL Source: https://llmgame.scalex.dev/    Warning: This is a cached snapshot of the original page, consider retry with caching opt-out.    Markdown Content:&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The game highlights the friction between security and productivity, with some users arguing that the only way to maintain velocity is to bypass permissions entirely via containerized environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48308636&quot; title=&quot;Use this and save yourself: claude --dangerously-skip-permissions&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48311157&quot; title=&quot;--dangerously-skip-permissions is the only way to fly. Of course your environment needs to be properly containerized and autobackup set up, so even rm -rf from your harness would do nothing. Life is too short to spend on replying to permissions requests.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters noted flaws in the game&amp;#39;s threat model, pointing out that &amp;#34;innocent&amp;#34; commands like `npm run build` can be easily compromised by an agent that has already edited local files &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48310698&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s funny. It told me that blocking &amp;#39;npm run build&amp;#39; was the wrong answer. Maybe it doesn&amp;#39;t really under The threat model.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48311606&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s a great example of how dangerous actions are perceived as innocent. The entire model of approving specific commands is absolutely bonkers. npm run build = run an arbitrary shell command written in package.json Meanwhile the agent could have done any of the following without approval: - edited `package.json` to contain any arbitrary build command - planted malicious code in `build.js` (called by `npm run build`) - planted malicious code in `node_modules/xyz/index.js` (imported by…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some players found success by reflexively denying all requests to achieve a &amp;#34;security-conscious&amp;#34; rating, others criticized the game&amp;#39;s assumptions about security hygiene, such as whether secrets belong in shell configuration files &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48312382&quot; title=&quot;Fun game, but it showed the lack of security hygiene employed by the game writer. It said `cat ~/.zshrc` was bad because it would share tokens and secrets, but I would never put secrets into my shell rc.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48311215&quot; title=&quot;This is amazing! Currently you can &amp;#39;cheat&amp;#39; by simply denying all requests as quickly as possible. This will give you the &amp;#39;security-conscious engineer&amp;#39; badge and a perfect score in terms of how many requests were processed. (You will get the &amp;#39;overblock&amp;#39; notification, but it&amp;#39;s somewhat tucked away at the bottom and the screen still looks as if you won) I also tried to play as the hustle4lyfe move fast and break things engineer and simply approved as many requests as quickly as possible - turns…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314380&quot; title=&quot;Good catch, this has now been nerfed and this approach has gotten its own title&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/27/google-employee-polymarket-insider-trading.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Google employee charged with $1M Polymarket insider trading bet on search term&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cnbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48302822&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;319 points · 212 comments · by pseudolus&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Federal prosecutors have charged Google engineer Michele Spagnuolo with fraud for allegedly using confidential &amp;#34;Year in Search&amp;#34; data to net $1.2 million in insider bets on the prediction platform Polymarket. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/27/google-employee-polymarket-insider-trading.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Google employee charged with $1M Polymarket insider trading bet on search term    URL Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/27/google-employee-polymarket-insider-trading.html    Published Time: 2026-05-27T23:32:34+0000    Markdown Content:  # Google employee polymarket insider trading    [Skip Navigation](https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/27/google-employee-polymarket-insider-trading.html#MainContent)    [![Image 2: CNBC…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The case highlights a fundamental tension in prediction markets: while they are theoretically designed to surface insider information for public benefit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48303869&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s sort of the point of prediction markets: they surface insider information by allowing people to profit off of it.  The benefit is to people watching the prices , who can then use that information to make better decisions ahead of the answer being revealed to the public.  It&amp;#39;s not necessarily to market participants, who need to be aware of who else is trading the market and have a credible reason to believe they have better information.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, critics argue they function as unregulated casinos that require &amp;#34;suckers&amp;#34; to lose money to insiders for trivial data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304583&quot; title=&quot;It barely makes sense, though? The idea is that it will surface insider information to the public. That happens only because the insider is financially incentivized to place a bet. But they will only bet if they can win money, and they can only win money if someone is taking the other side of their bet, which necessarily means someone without their insider information. In other words, prediction markets require suckers to lose money to insiders in order for the public to learn new information.…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48303973&quot; title=&quot;That’s the academic theory behind these markets, but there’s no actual value to knowing who the most searched celebrity will be or any of this other garbage. It’s just an unregulated casino with guesses about the popularity of Google searches instead of guessing black or red.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters question the societal value of knowing search trends ahead of time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304659&quot; title=&quot;Sure, but let’s consider the bet the accused took: who is the most searched person in 2025. What benefit is there in knowing this ahead of time? Who is making decisions based on this?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304460&quot; title=&quot;Why are we wasting government money cracking down on Polymarket betting?  The most offensive thing in this article is the government pretending Polymarket bets are securities. Prediction markets provide no benefit to society and don&amp;#39;t need to exist.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt; and debate whether these platforms are legitimate financial tools or merely &amp;#34;money grabs&amp;#34; disguised by academic theory &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304332&quot; title=&quot;The unfortunate thing is that, while their academic position sounds plausible on paper, just like with most crypto things it&amp;#39;s just a money grab. How many crypto people (with legitimate backgrounds just like the founders of Polymarket and Kalshi) stood up and said big things about freedom and the unbanked etc., turns out they were literally just scamming people- there are so many examples besides FTX. Letting people bet on any random thing is not at all related to this &amp;#39;price everything&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Legal discussion focuses on how US authorities charged a foreign national for stealing private data from a US company, a move some see as a step toward regulating these markets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304578&quot; title=&quot;I was curious how a man in Switzerland gets charged in the US for a placing bets on a site that doesn&amp;#39;t allow the US to participate. The short answer seems to be that he stole private information from a US company and used that information to enrich himself. And then got that charge enhanced with things like wire fraud and transacting on systems involving US currency. And another commentor suggests that punishing insider traders in a step towards legitimzing and regulating prediction markets in…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://itsfoss.com/news/amd-vivado-bait-and-switch-on-linux-users/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AMD pulls a bait-and-switch on Linux users with Vivado licensing changes&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (itsfoss.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48307231&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;337 points · 166 comments · by teleforce&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AMD is moving its Vivado design suite to a tiered licensing model that restricts the free &amp;#34;Basic&amp;#34; tier to Windows, requiring Linux users to pay up to $1,800 annually for continued platform support starting with the 2026.1 release. &lt;a href=&quot;https://itsfoss.com/news/amd-vivado-bait-and-switch-on-linux-users/&quot; title=&quot;AMD Pulls a Bait-and-Switch on Linux Users with Vivado Licensing Changes    Tells Linux users to either pay up or get stuck on an aging, unsupported version forever.    [![It&amp;#39;s FOSS](/content/images/size/w30/2026/01/itsfoss-logo.png)](https://itsfoss.com)    * [🧩 Quizzes &amp;amp; Puzzles](https://itsfoss.com/quiz/)  * [🎒 Resources](https://itsfoss.com/resources/)  * [📬 Newsletter](https://itsfoss.com/newsletter/)  * [▶️ YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/%40itsfoss)  * [🏘️ Community](https://itsfoss.community/)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AMD&amp;#39;s decision to move the Linux version of Vivado to a paid tier is criticized as a &amp;#34;beancounting&amp;#34; move that prioritizes short-term revenue over long-term reputation and marketing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48307360&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s long been said: &amp;#39;AMD never misses a chance to miss a chance.&amp;#39; In this case, the chance to trash its reputation with customers.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48308913&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It can only mean that their Linux user base is growing, ie. more commercial operators are turning to Linux. Well, more correctly that they think the commercial base has grown, and that there&amp;#39;s revenue on the table by forcing their standard-edition-using commercial Linux users into contracts. Maybe the thinking is that the Linux users are more sophisticated and able to self-support than windows shops, and so they&amp;#39;re choosing not to buy support even though they could?  Seems not implausible,…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48307926&quot; title=&quot;AMD has long been the proof that hardware is easier than software. Apparently, hardware is also easier than marketing.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that FPGA software should be free to encourage hardware sales &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48310263&quot; title=&quot;AMD business should be selling FPGA hardware. The software suite should come for free. If it doesn&amp;#39;t then people should not purchase AMD FPGAs. It is absurd that in 2026 you have to pay for such tools. It feels like buying a propietary compiler in 80&amp;#39;s or 90&amp;#39;s. No one wants that anymore.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that Linux users are a &amp;#34;miserly and demanding&amp;#34; demographic that generates disproportionately high support costs relative to their numbers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48309458&quot; title=&quot;What is really interesting about Linux users is that they cost an enormous amount in support. I think it was a dev of the reboot of Planetary Annihilation that said their Linux users / build made up a few percent of the sales but over 90 percent of all support tickets (!). Mind you that this was before Valve&amp;#39;s Proton. Edit:   It was &amp;lt;0.1% sales but 20% of all support tickets: https://xcancel.com/bgolus/status/1080213166116597760&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48308064&quot; title=&quot;Non-paying users aren’t customers, though, so they must view all this outrage seems irrelevant. Which suggests that they view free-tier Linux users as significantly less likely to ever pay for its use. That matches my understanding of the (non-Steam) Linux as a miserly and demanding target market, so I don’t really fault them for the choice — especially given how brutally expensive it is to support the IDIC of Miscellaneous Linuxes. Kind of surprised they haven’t just withdrawn free support for…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48311547&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;The software suite should come for free. Ideally yes, SW should be free, but we don&amp;#39;t live in an ideal world. This isn&amp;#39;t Apple or Google who can give you SW for free since they take a 30% cut on everything on the Appstore besides the profit margins on the HW they sell you. The typical customers of FPGAs are large HW companies with money to spend on SW, not tinkerers in their garage who might some day build a billion dollar company. And if you do become a billion dollar garage company, you will…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Commentators disagree on the motive: some believe AMD is targeting a growing commercial Linux base &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48308826&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; “Until now, it has been available for free on both Windows and Linux” If it’s any consolation, it wasn’t and still isn’t available on macOS. Also the part about Linux having a “small user base” made me chuckle. That’s the opposite of what I’m observing. If they wanted to save costs, they would have dropped Linux support altogether. But instead, they are making it a paid benefit. It can only mean that their Linux user base is growing, ie. more commercial operators are turning to Linux. Still,…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, while others suggest it is a strategic attempt to force sophisticated users into support contracts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48308913&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It can only mean that their Linux user base is growing, ie. more commercial operators are turning to Linux. Well, more correctly that they think the commercial base has grown, and that there&amp;#39;s revenue on the table by forcing their standard-edition-using commercial Linux users into contracts. Maybe the thinking is that the Linux users are more sophisticated and able to self-support than windows shops, and so they&amp;#39;re choosing not to buy support even though they could?  Seems not implausible,…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dbos.dev/blog/postgres-is-all-you-need-for-durable-execution&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Building durable workflows on Postgres&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (dbos.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48313530&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;353 points · 144 comments · by KraftyOne&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DBOS argues that using Postgres as a native orchestrator for durable workflows is more efficient than external systems, leveraging the database&amp;#39;s built-in scalability, observability, and security to simplify program recovery and state management. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dbos.dev/blog/postgres-is-all-you-need-for-durable-execution&quot; title=&quot;Title: Postgres-backed Durable Workflow Execution | DBOS    URL Source: https://www.dbos.dev/blog/postgres-is-all-you-need-for-durable-execution    Published Time: Thu, 28 May 2026 18:42:42 GMT    Markdown Content:  Durable workflows are a simple but powerful tool for building reliable programs. The idea is that as your program runs, you regularly checkpoint its progress to a database. That way, if your program ever crashes or fails, you can reload from the last checkpoint to recover it from its last…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some developers advocate for using Postgres as a unified engine for workflows, search, and queues to reduce operational complexity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314331&quot; title=&quot;All you need is Postgres until you scale into TBs of data. We use Postgresql as a durable workflow engine, vector search, time-series data, BM25 search, OLTP/OLAP engine, and a queue. It&amp;#39;s basically the only dependency we have for https://lobu.ai The main benefit is centralizing all the data in one place so we don&amp;#39;t need to worry about copying data in between multiple systems. Once something becomes the bottleneck, you can eventually migrate to a purpose specific tool to scale out.To be honest,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others warn that historical attempts to centralize logic in the database resulted in unmaintainable, version-control-deficient stored procedures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315306&quot; title=&quot;This has been tried, but thousand-line stored procedures are truly a nightmare.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48316208&quot; title=&quot;lack of version control, clunky language mechanics, performance issues, etc.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Temporal remains a popular alternative for its developer SDK and enforcement of good practices, though it faces criticism regarding strict payload limits and claims of high infrastructure costs at scale &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48313750&quot; title=&quot;Curious to know experience of people using DBOS and Temporal. I have used Temporal in the past, works really good, my only problem with it was  some limits on request payload or event sizes, created some inconveniences to us when building solutions. It also enforces good engineering practices, but sometimes you don&amp;#39;t want to write special logic if your CSV file is larger than 2Mb, upload it to S3, pass link, then download it in the workflow. What is your experience with DBOS? How does it…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314087&quot; title=&quot;I run a large on-prem temporal setup - throwaway acct as they will likely out me. Temporal is, in my opinion having run it in prod for over a year - poorly designed, slow and ridicliously heavy infra wise. If you&amp;#39;re doing anything non-trivial (say, 200+ events/workflow) and you need to run only a couple hundred of them concurrently all day, you&amp;#39;re going to spend millions on infra, and it&amp;#39;s still going to absolutely suck. Try running their own benchmarks, the numbers are pathetic. Their sales…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. However, these performance critiques are contested by users who argue that the resource requirements for moderate workloads should not reach the &amp;#34;millions&amp;#34; suggested by detractors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315391&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If you&amp;#39;re doing anything non-trivial (say, 200+ events/workflow) and you need to run only a couple hundred of them concurrently all day, you&amp;#39;re going to spend millions on infra, and it&amp;#39;s still going to absolutely suck. Where are the “millions” on infra going? It’s a handful of services and a Postgres? &amp;gt; Their sales team is also absolutely appalling and desperate. You said “on-prem”. It’s open source; why are you dealing with their sales team? &amp;gt; If you&amp;#39;re doing anything non-trivial (say, 200+…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/quasiblog/tron-legacy/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Nitpicking the shell history scene in &amp;#39;Tron: Legacy&amp;#39;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (chiark.greenend.org.uk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314002&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;303 points · 122 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A detailed technical analysis of a terminal screenshot from *Tron: Legacy* reveals a mix of authentic Unix commands, plausible in-universe character errors, and filmmaker goofs, such as the use of &amp;#34;bin/history&amp;#34; and conflicting OS identifiers like &amp;#34;SolarOS&amp;#34; running on both SPARC and x86 architectures. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/quasiblog/tron-legacy/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Nitpicking the shell history scene in ‘Tron: Legacy’    URL Source: https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/quasiblog/tron-legacy/    Published Time: Thu, 28 May 2026 11:43:00 GMT    Markdown Content:  [Simon Tatham, 2026-05-28]    *   [Introduction](https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/quasiblog/tron-legacy/#intro)  *   [Spoilers](https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/quasiblog/tron-legacy/#spoilers)  *   [The…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights technical details in *Tron: Legacy*, such as the use of Emacs by antagonists versus Vi by protagonists &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48316778&quot; title=&quot;One of my favorite details of this movie is that the semi-antagonistic ENCOM executive Dillinger uses emacs [0], while Flynn uses vi. Clearly, the VFX artist who made the film&amp;#39;s UNIX shells had a preference! (Dillinger is also shown running &amp;#39;ENCOM Linux&amp;#39; -- is the VFX artist a BSD user? As he cycles through his buffers, we see a split second of `hanoi-unix`; definitely not the type to pay attention during boring board meetings!) [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-86iKkn6k0#t=3m55&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, and debates whether a specific scene depicts a &amp;#34;backdoor&amp;#34; username or an unobfuscated password &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317313&quot; title=&quot;$ login -n root      Login incorrect      login: backdoor      No home directory specified in password file!      Logging in with home=/      # I don&amp;#39;t agree with the interpretation that Sam tried and failed to login as root, and THEN tried to login as a different user, backdoor. Because if that&amp;#39;s what happened, shouldn&amp;#39;t there be another $ prompt before he types `backdoor` and gets the #? It seems to me that&amp;#39;s an unobfuscated password field and `backdoor` is the password.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While the Daft Punk soundtrack is widely praised as a masterpiece that outshines the film itself &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315134&quot; title=&quot;As an aside the Daft Punk soundtrack that accompanies this film is an absolute masterpiece. I think it&amp;#39;s their best work. It&amp;#39;s such a shame the film doesn&amp;#39;t live up to it&amp;#39;s own soundtrack.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48316734&quot; title=&quot;Tron 1 for the plot, Tron 2 for daft punk, Tron 3... we don&amp;#39;t talk about.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, users disagree on the ethics of fair use; some argue that critiques of famous IP should involve revenue sharing with studios &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48316634&quot; title=&quot;Sure it sucks that you got takedown notices. Ideally it would have been revenue share. Your critique is mostly interesting because it&amp;#39;s using famous IP. Critique something no one cares about to see how much your additions are adding vs the pull of the original content itself.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317317&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think those laws will last. They were written in the 70s before youtube. Ideally the law would allow the critique but recongize it&amp;#39;s the IP drawing in the users, and sharing some of the revenue.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, while others maintain that commentary is legally protected and should be defended against bad-faith takedowns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314108&quot; title=&quot;Wonderful! At the bottom he notes: &amp;#39;I’m sitting in the UK as I write this. Under UK law, I believe this should constitute fair dealing: the purpose is quotation for criticism and review, and this single screen capture is in no way an alternative to paying to see the original film. The film comes from the USA, and under USA law I think it similarly constitutes fair use: it’s for non-profit educational purposes, the amount of the full work used is extremely small, and the effect on the value of…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48316871&quot; title=&quot;Commentary and criticism are by law protected as fair use. Why would revenue share be done &amp;#39;ideally&amp;#39;? News reporting is also covered under fair use, do you expect news organizations to pay for reporting on movies? Ideally fair use would be defended, it is the law of the land, and when a takedown notice was emitted maliciously, with known bad faith, the actor that did that would have to pay for the amount of time that the legal content was down.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Some commenters also questioned the author&amp;#39;s specific fixation on font widths within the technical analysis &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315446&quot; title=&quot;Why is this guy so obsessed with the variable vs fixed-width font, you&amp;#39;d think he&amp;#39;s the guy who wrote putty or something&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315965&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m confused. The whole point of the post, as stated in the title, is to nitpick that one movie scene. Why does the inclusion of one specific nitpick bother you when it&amp;#39;s completely on-topic?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sfstandard.com/2026/05/28/sf-startup-secretly-testing-robots-airbnbs-trashing-lawsuit-claims/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SF startup is testing robots in Airbnbs, and trashing them, lawsuit claims&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sfstandard.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317093&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;269 points · 150 comments · by drewda&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A San Francisco homeowner is suing The Bot Company, alleging the startup secretly rented his Airbnb to test household robots that caused over $12,000 in property damage. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sfstandard.com/2026/05/28/sf-startup-secretly-testing-robots-airbnbs-trashing-lawsuit-claims/&quot; title=&quot;An SF startup is secretly testing robots in Airbnbs, and trashing them, lawsuit claims    The guests behind the bookings have received negative reviews from a number of Bay Area hosts, alleging they damaged the property and personal belongings.    ADVERTISEMENT    [Skip to main content](#main)    Open search bar and full menu    [The San Francisco Standard](/)    * [Latest](/latest/)  * [News](/news/)  * [Politics](/politics/)  * [Business](/business/)  * [Opinion](/opinion/)  * [Culture](/culture/)  * [Food &amp;amp;…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The startup&amp;#39;s use of Airbnbs as secret testing grounds is widely condemned as a &amp;#34;morally bankrupt&amp;#34; extension of the &amp;#34;move fast and break things&amp;#34; ethos, effectively outsourcing R&amp;amp;D risks to unsuspecting property owners &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317621&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Founded by alums of Tesla and the autonomous vehicle company Cruise, the San Francisco startup has received hundreds of millions in venture capital funding and is valued at $2 billion Stop outsourcing the cost of your vision to the rest of society. Especially when it’s peanuts to you and meaningful to, in this case, the host of what they call an apartment and you seem to think is a test course.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317439&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s exactly this ethos, the &amp;#39;move fast and break things&amp;#39;, and oh, we don&amp;#39;t give a fuck about who/what we damage in the process - careless people indeed. I am someone who came of age during an incredibly hopeful time about how technology could be a force for good. The silicon valley ethos at present is totally morally bankrupt and rotten to the core.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters find it particularly ironic that robots designed for household chores instead caused physical damage and left the premises in disarray &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317336&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Donovan alleges that employees of the Bot Company(opens in new tab) rented his home “under false pretenses” to conduct prototype testing on robots they’re training to do household chores. &amp;gt;A refrigerator shelf was cracked, and a broken glass or dish had been left in the garbage disposal. A wooden nightstand drawer was chipped. Cups and plates were in the wrong places. It looked like the furniture had been moved around. Not sure which one is worse, the fact that the bot can&amp;#39;t actually do…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48318391&quot; title=&quot;The irony is the company is trying to make robots to help clean airbnbs for renter turnovers.  Instead they are messing up airbnbs and making them harder to clean before turnovers.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest this behavior warrants criminal charges for &amp;#34;false pretenses,&amp;#34; others note the irony of Airbnb being the victim of the same &amp;#34;ask for forgiveness, not permission&amp;#34; strategy it once used to disrupt the hospitality industry &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317883&quot; title=&quot;The only way to stop this is for charges to be brought against the employees who made the bookings under false pretenses.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48318801&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s fine to make mistakes, that&amp;#39;s how you learn. The problem here was that they didn&amp;#39;t announce to the host that they are doing a test of their in-development equipment. So the host wasn&amp;#39;t able to add the additional risk and hassle to the price, which in this instance would have been a quite legitimate ask as the robot damaged their revenue generating property. It&amp;#39;s very ironic that Airbnb itself has done similar practices in the past where it ignored hospitality regulations to establish their…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fortune.com/2026/05/26/sam-altman-dario-amodei-walking-back-ai-jobs-apocalypse-prophecies-ipo/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sam Altman and Dario Amodei are both walking back AI jobs apocalypse predictions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (fortune.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314363&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;234 points · 180 comments · by ianrahman&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei are walking back previous predictions of an AI-driven &amp;#34;jobs apocalypse,&amp;#34; now suggesting that automation may enhance productivity rather than eliminate white-collar roles as they prepare for potential IPOs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fortune.com/2026/05/26/sam-altman-dario-amodei-walking-back-ai-jobs-apocalypse-prophecies-ipo/&quot; title=&quot;Sam Altman and Dario Amodei are both walking back their AI jobs apocalypse prophecies as they eye blockbuster IPOs | Fortune    Some leaders like Goldman Sachs’s David Solomon and Box’s Aaron Levie have been saying all along that there won’t be a white-collar wipeout.    Search    Subscribe    * [Home](/)  * [Latest](/section/latest/)  * [Fortune 500](/section/fortune-500/)  * [Finance](/section/finance/)  * [Tech](/section/tech/)  * [Leadership](/section/leadership/)  * [Lifestyle](/section/lifestyle/)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The shift in rhetoric from AI leaders is viewed by some as a strategic &amp;#34;submarine&amp;#34; PR effort to mitigate public backlash and regulatory friction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315595&quot; title=&quot;This is an absolutely classic PR &amp;#39;submarine&amp;#39; effort to reframe the impact of AI Paul Graham has mandatory essay on this - https://www.paulgraham.com/submarine.html (1) More than 50% of Americans at this point are more concerned about AI than excited for it - https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2026/03/12/key-findi... (2) Popular media is feeding into this zeitgeist with headlines like - &amp;#39;Prepare for an AI jobs apocalypse&amp;#39; eg - https://www.economist.com/leaders/2026/05/14/prepare-for-an-...…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, while others suspect it reflects a realization that LLMs were overestimated and must now be marketed as tools to keep developers &amp;#34;burning tokens&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314566&quot; title=&quot;It is kinda funny the irony of going from &amp;#39;we are going to replace devs&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;we &amp;lt;3 devs, keep burning those tokens&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314710&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think its as big of a deal as its made out to be. They are human after all and have overestimated the capabilities of LLMs. What&amp;#39;s more important is that this signals product market fit.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Many commenters argue that executives fundamentally misunderstand the complexity of human labor, wrongly assuming that automating implementation can replace the critical work of defining intent and specifications &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315128&quot; title=&quot;Unfortunately it will take longer for our bosses to walk it back. I feel like I&amp;#39;m fighting the battle daily, telling execs what kind of work LLMs do not replace... it&amp;#39;s very slippery, they keep on doing the rhetorical texas two-step - I don&amp;#39;t think they even realize they&amp;#39;re doing it. We communicate that LLM is amplifying, they hear it can replace. &amp;#39;No, we need humans to help with specs&amp;#39; &amp;#39;But AI can help with that.&amp;#39; &amp;#39;But only help , they can&amp;#39;t come up with the idea .&amp;#39; &amp;#39;Sure they can, we can just…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315293&quot; title=&quot;It tells you a lot about your execs and how little they care, either for their employees or their customers. The quarterly profits are their God and they will worship at the altar of the stock price. Instead of finding ways to make AI enhance their employees and make them more productive, they immediately jump to ways to eliminate employees. It&amp;#39;s the opposite of a growth mentallity. I&amp;#39;d love for these executives to show me a time when investing in people was the wrong choice. I&amp;#39;ve never seen a…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. However, there is significant disagreement, with some users reporting that AI is already solving complex problems autonomously and warning that dismissing its job-replacement potential mirrors the early skepticism of the internet &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315466&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; &amp;#39;But only help, they can&amp;#39;t come up with the idea.&amp;#39; &amp;#39;Sure they can, we can just ask them.&amp;#39; I&amp;#39;ve had multiple instances now where AI left to it&amp;#39;s own devices has solved a tricky problem that I honestly didn&amp;#39;t think it was capable of. I routinely have them design their own experiment loops, learn from each round and iterate on the process. Multiple times it has lead to a needle moving change with no need for human intervention. There are, of course, many cases where this is not true, but they&amp;#39;re…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.science.org/content/article/i-hated-writing-until-i-learned-there-s-science-it&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I hated writing until I learned there’s a science to it (2024)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (science.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48312528&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;246 points · 111 comments · by o4c&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A scientist describes how viewing writing as a structured, rule-based system rather than a subjective art form helped them overcome a long-standing hatred of the process and improve their technical communication. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.science.org/content/article/i-hated-writing-until-i-learned-there-s-science-it&quot; title=&quot;Title: Just a moment...    URL Source: https://www.science.org/content/article/i-hated-writing-until-i-learned-there-s-science-it    Warning: Target URL returned error 403: Forbidden  Warning: This page maybe requiring CAPTCHA, please make sure you are authorized to access this page.    Markdown Content:  ## www.science.org    ## Performing security verification    This website uses a security service to protect against malicious bots. This page is displayed while the website verifies you are not a bot.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the &amp;#34;gap&amp;#34; between a beginner’s high standards and their actual output, emphasizing that the only way to improve is through a high volume of work and persistence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314079&quot; title=&quot;Nobody tells this to people who are beginners, I wish someone told me. All of us who do creative work, we get into it because we have good taste. But there is this gap. For the first couple years you make stuff, it’s just not that good. It’s trying to be good, it has potential, but it’s not. But your taste, the thing that got you into the game, is still killer. And your taste is why your work disappoints you. A lot of people never get past this phase, they quit. Most people I know who do…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315020&quot; title=&quot;The most prolific author in the world, Ryoki Inoue, published over 1000 books. He has basically the same advice. &amp;gt; &amp;#39;The secret of the creative process is in 98% of sweat, 1% of talent and 1% of luck.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users found the advice to simply &amp;#34;practice more&amp;#34; anticlimactic or vague &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314387&quot; title=&quot;Well that was anticlimactic. I thought there would be at least a little more insight than just practise more.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314150&quot; title=&quot;Nice of her not to divulge the science of it and just say it&amp;#39;s a lot of iterations. That would not make me hate writing less.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others shared anecdotes of how disciplined repetition—such as writing daily paragraphs or mastering trade skills—eventually leads to intuition and excellence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314515&quot; title=&quot;I am a handyman and have a lot of weird, specific physical skills. Like being able to paint around an electrical outlet, caulking, leveling concrete, juggling, cartwheels, tying cherry stems in my mouth, etc. The life of an embodied worker. When I am teaching anyone any of these skills, the first thing I say is “are you ready to be bad at this for a long time?” Sometimes it catches people off guard. On the other hand, if someone says “yes” then I know that they are going to be a good learner.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315246&quot; title=&quot;Heh. I’m not in the trades, but ~15 years ago I decided to rock/tape/mud ~800sqft of my house myself… to top it off, my lighting design included wall grazing lights and a satin sheen finish and another wall that gets hit lengthwise for 10’ at sunset. That was a long, long period that tested my sanity and marriage. It was probably good enough after first pass, but my standards were far beyond unreasonable and I had to live with results. I eventually got rather good, albeit slow, and now can…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48316040&quot; title=&quot;If you have kids or if you ever get kids, consider what I have done years ago. When my kids were in middle school (and I think I should have asked them to do that in elementary) I forced them to write a single or a couple of paragraphs about their day, every day, and post into our family group channel in Telegram. &amp;#39;It doesn&amp;#39;t have to be perfect or even beautiful&amp;#39;, I said. &amp;#39;Just write something, anything. Every single day&amp;#39;. It was tough in the beginning. They&amp;#39;d forget, but I was strict - the…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. However, a notable challenge remains for those who recognize their work is poor but lack the specific intuition or feedback necessary to identify exactly how to &amp;#34;un-suck&amp;#34; it &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314487&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;And your taste is why your work disappoints you. [...] We know our work doesn’t have this special thing that we want it to have. I think most of us have experienced this.  I consider myself an above-average writer and I absolutely hate everything I write. But the problem, for me anyway, is that it&amp;#39;s exceedingly difficult to know what to work on next in order to improve.  In that regard writing is entirely unlike a lot of sports. My throws are bad?  Better throw 100 passes a day, every day,…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-27</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-27</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://orchidfiles.com/im-tired-of-ai-generated-answers/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I&amp;#39;m Tired of Talking to AI&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (orchidfiles.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48292224&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2003 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 951 comments · by theorchid&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author expresses growing frustration with the erosion of human interaction as peers and colleagues increasingly use AI-generated responses to bypass genuine communication in professional and social settings. &lt;a href=&quot;https://orchidfiles.com/im-tired-of-ai-generated-answers/&quot; title=&quot;Title: I’m tired of talking to AI    URL Source: https://orchidfiles.com/im-tired-of-ai-generated-answers/    Published Time: 2026-05-22T00:10:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  I found GitHub repositories that were spreading malware. I asked AI what to do about it, but it gave me nothing useful. So I opened a discussion on GitHub. Someone replied. It was the exact same text the AI had given me. I called it out and the comment was deleted. Then another person replied. It was the same AI answer again.    I…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users express a profound sense of alienation when human interactions are replaced by unvetted AI responses, which many perceive as a &amp;#34;psychotic&amp;#34; or lazy behavior that destroys workplace trust and genuine connection &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48292579&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;But even when I talk to people, they forward my questions to AI and send me the AI’s answer. This is the killer issue. It&amp;#39;s so profoundly saddenning, it feels like watching an adult being asked a question and calling mom to answer for them. There is something deeply disturbing in it that makes me feel I&amp;#39;m not talking to a self sufficient entity.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48292959&quot; title=&quot;What I hate about this whole thing, is that there are many reasons someone might reach out to a coworker with questions. Not all require the knowledge in fancy markdown with emojis. Maybe they want to show respect to a person by asking their opinion before proceeding with a change Maybe they want to share context and make that person aware of what they&amp;#39;re thinking without being so obvious Maybe they need _that person_ to provide some assurances directly because they are not confident in thier…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48292467&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I worked as a developer at a company. I asked the business owner a question about a business task. He sent me a ChatGPT screenshot with the answer. I replied that it had nothing to do with my question and everything there was wrong. A minute later he sent me another ChatGPT screenshot. He didn’t even read the AI’s answer. That&amp;#39;s just rude and borderline psychotic behavior. It&amp;#39;s still a bit better at my workplace but irritating nonetheless - my boss would &amp;#39;research&amp;#39; a feature and prep notes in…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that forwarding AI answers is a modern equivalent to &amp;#34;Let Me Google That For You&amp;#34; for low-effort inquiries, others contend it devalues the responder&amp;#39;s role and ignores the nuanced social context of why a person reached out in the first place &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48292959&quot; title=&quot;What I hate about this whole thing, is that there are many reasons someone might reach out to a coworker with questions. Not all require the knowledge in fancy markdown with emojis. Maybe they want to show respect to a person by asking their opinion before proceeding with a change Maybe they want to share context and make that person aware of what they&amp;#39;re thinking without being so obvious Maybe they need _that person_ to provide some assurances directly because they are not confident in thier…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48292804&quot; title=&quot;True but how many times have people sent someone &amp;#39;let me google that for you&amp;#39;. Some people are inherently lazy and unload their laziness to someone else to do the thinking for them. I still think sending someone an AI answer is terrible but then again, if you are going to ask me for help, at least make some effort first. EDIT: By laziness I mean that there are known places (they know of) with documentation that cover what they need but they don&amp;#39;t go there first and not something I have some…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48292542&quot; title=&quot;AI makes it apparent that the only value some people bring to the table is that they have access to information that you do not. If now they fold that one advantage by just delegating everything to AI (which is in the same position as you informationwise), they will remove themselves from the worker pool soon.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable anecdotes include a business owner repeatedly sending incorrect ChatGPT screenshots without reading them and a &amp;#34;magical&amp;#34; power outage in Iberia that forced people to rediscover the value of being present with one another &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48292561&quot; title=&quot;One of the most amazing things happened during the day long power cut in 2025 in Spain and Portugal... eventually the cell towers went down and everyone just went to the parks and socialised. Connected with friends, strangers. Everyone was so in the moment because there was nowhere else to be, nothing else to distract them. People would pick up their phone and realise there was nothing there for them and put it back down and continue chatting. People were present in a way I&amp;#39;ve never seen in…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48292467&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I worked as a developer at a company. I asked the business owner a question about a business task. He sent me a ChatGPT screenshot with the answer. I replied that it had nothing to do with my question and everything there was wrong. A minute later he sent me another ChatGPT screenshot. He didn’t even read the AI’s answer. That&amp;#39;s just rude and borderline psychotic behavior. It&amp;#39;s still a bit better at my workplace but irritating nonetheless - my boss would &amp;#39;research&amp;#39; a feature and prep notes in…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. To combat the perceived loss of humanity, some commenters have even begun intentionally adding idiosyncrasies to their writing to prove they are not bots [9&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://simonwillison.net/2026/May/27/product-market-fit/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I think Anthropic and OpenAI have found product-market fit&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (simonwillison.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48296794&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1088 points&lt;/strong&gt; · &lt;strong&gt;1241 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by simonw&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic and OpenAI have reportedly achieved product-market fit as enterprise customers transition from discounted subscriptions to high-volume API pricing for coding agents. This shift, marked by surging revenues and increased enterprise sales hiring, suggests that sophisticated AI agents are becoming essential, high-revenue tools for professional workflows. &lt;a href=&quot;https://simonwillison.net/2026/May/27/product-market-fit/&quot; title=&quot;Title: I think Anthropic and OpenAI have found product-market fit    URL Source: https://simonwillison.net/2026/May/27/product-market-fit/    Published Time: Thu, 28 May 2026 03:45:33 GMT    Markdown Content:  27th May 2026    Anthropic are [strongly rumored](https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/20/anthropic-says-its-about-to-have-its-first-profitable-quarter/) to be about to have their first profitable quarter. Stories [are…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Anthropic and OpenAI show signs of product-market fit, critics argue they face a massive &amp;#34;trillion-dollar&amp;#34; revenue gap to recoup hardware investments, especially as marginal productivity gains may not justify high token costs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48297512&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;ve got, ballpark, $5t to $10t to make back in the next 5 years, or the hardware buildouts will start getting written down. This means we&amp;#39;re going to need $1t+ per year in spending, per year, on tokens. 200m knowledge workers in the world, 30m developers. We&amp;#39;re talking about a world where you need 5% of every knowledge workers salary to go into tokens. 20% if you&amp;#39;re a developer. That&amp;#39;s a _huge_ shift. Most people I know cite +20%-40% velocity with these tools, against the actual work their…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48298640&quot; title=&quot;Here are a few thoughts: - The publicly available information about how inference costs compare to training costs is conflicted. EEs involved in datacenters talk about power usage spikes during training runs as if they were a major factor in the designs, but academic papers discussing cost-optimal scaling confidently treat inference-time compute as a major factor. - On the side of the balance indicating that training is more compute-intensive after amortization than inference is that Chinese…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant skepticism regarding claims of profitability, with some suggesting financial figures are engineered to appease investors ahead of potential IPOs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48298362&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Anthropic are strongly rumored to be about to have their first profitable quarter No, its more like their own leak to WSJ and according to Ed Zitron -&amp;gt; seems to be heavily engineered via non-GAAP practices such as counting potential , but not  realised revenue as actual revenue - the stuff for which I would be arrested if I did it at my company. Also it appears according to Ed&amp;#39;s analysis - strangely they seem to be projecting only that one quarter as profitable - potentially to calm the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48298786&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m about to leave a shallow comment, but I am a bit skeptical of the supposed drop in inference costs. If AI labs saw a lot of potential there, they&amp;#39;d surely be bragging about it non-stop? So the fact that publicly available information is conflicted is probably a sign that at the very least, the numbers aren&amp;#39;t amazing. Yes I know there&amp;#39;s no evidence and this is lazy reasoning. But there&amp;#39;s probably a bit of truth to this line of thought.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, the rise of high-quality open-source models allows companies to run &amp;#34;good enough&amp;#34; local hardware, potentially undermining the expensive API-based business models of frontier labs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48298952&quot; title=&quot;I work for a tiny little company ($150MM annual rev with 9% net) and we are already looking at dropping $100k on hardware to run local models because, for us, they&amp;#39;re &amp;#39;good enough.&amp;#39; Our estimated spend for AIaaS would exceed that cost in less than a year. In a few years, there will be hardware capable of running frontier models good enough for most things at accessible prices for even tiny companies.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48297519&quot; title=&quot;So how do openai and anthropic plan to keep customers when GLM-5.1 is just as good and open source and a lot cheaper? I don&amp;#39;t see the business model working. My closest friend actually does automation software for large companies. He does not use Claude or openai at all. He primarily uses gpt 120b on cerebras and glm-5.1 for heavy thinking work.  And some other small models for various tasks. All open source. And these systems are extremely useful for the businesses and are able to run fully…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48299286&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, that&amp;#39;s the part that just seems to be wildly under-discussed to me. If open source models are ~3-6 months behind SOTA, and ~opus4.6 capabilities are good-enough for product market fit, do the frontier labs have half a decade to catch up on their prior burn? AI cost ballooning faster than companies can afford is becoming a very common topic in my circles right now. The era of &amp;#39;I&amp;#39;ll pay infinitely more for marginal gains&amp;#39; is over from what I can tell.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.youtube/news-and-events/improving-ai-labels-viewers-creators/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;YouTube to automatically label AI-generated videos&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.youtube)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48299753&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1315 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 820 comments · by nopg&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;YouTube is introducing new tools to automatically detect and label AI-generated or synthetic content to improve transparency and help viewers identify manipulated media on the platform. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.youtube/news-and-events/improving-ai-labels-viewers-creators/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;variety.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;digital&amp;amp;#x2F;news&amp;amp;#x2F;youtube-ai-video-labels-automatic-detection-1236758865&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;variety.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;digital&amp;amp;#x2F;news&amp;amp;#x2F;youtube-ai-video-label...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are skeptical about the accuracy of automated AI detection, citing historical failures like ZeroGPT and the potential for a &amp;#34;tinfoil hat&amp;#34; scenario where YouTube uses detection data to train undetectable AI models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48301112&quot; title=&quot;I have a hard time believing that AI can be used to label AI-generated videos without there being a significant number of false positives/negatives. I think back to ZeroGPT and it labeling the Declaration of Independence as AI-generated.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48299989&quot; title=&quot;Donning my tinfoil hat for a moment, YouTube is in a position here to simultaneously iterate on automatic AI video detection while also working out how to make AI generated video that&amp;#39;s impossible to detect.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48301204&quot; title=&quot;In theory you&amp;#39;re right, in practice you&amp;#39;re not. We don&amp;#39;t need the metaphysical solution to the problem of detecting AI videos for the rest of time. Certainly, it&amp;#39;s fairly easy to make something that mostly works most of the time. Enough to be very, very useful.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters criticize AI-generated content as &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; and lament the rise of low-quality AI dubs, others highlight its utility for niche audiences, such as older listeners seeking new music in specific retro genres &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48301182&quot; title=&quot;Curious to see if this will apply to music. YouTube seems to be filled with AI music these days - just do a search for &amp;#39;focus music&amp;#39; or the like, and you&amp;#39;ll see creators pushing new 1-hr tracks every few days with no mention of where the music came from or the fact it is AI generated. People praising it in the comments seem none the wiser (or perhaps they&amp;#39;re also bots).&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48302080&quot; title=&quot;A friend of mine who is a very non-technical dermatologist listens exclusively to Suno songs she made. All in genres and styles of songs from her era, the 80s and 90s. Who else is going to make new songs for her? New music almost always targets young people.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48302201&quot; title=&quot;There are millions of people making music in an ever-expanding set of genres. The idea that no one is making 80s or 90s style music is absurd. I guess she can listen to slop but maybe just look around a little instead? Edit: slop not slob&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48300403&quot; title=&quot;Can YouTube stop shoving terrible robot-English AI dubs down my throat? I once looked up a German language test. It was auto-AI dubbed into English. Ugggghhhhh..... There are also a lot of anime where the AI dub essentially removes the music and sound effects and leaves only a dreary AI voiceover. It&amp;#39;s kinda crazy that Google is pushing this feature out....&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Proposed solutions to the influx of synthetic content include hardware-level encryption signatures for authentic footage and user-side filters to remove AI videos from feeds &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48300312&quot; title=&quot;I think that &amp;#39;impossible to detect&amp;#39; is not something realistic if camera manufacturers are willing to start adding encryption signatures to their cameras outputs and are willing to vouch for them. I realize this would still allow fakes to be presented by governments in all likelihood, but not everyone.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48299826&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s great news.  Hopefully there will be a filter to allow or disallow AI video on your homepage/feed.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pcgamer.com/hardware/duckduckgos-ai-free-search-saw-nearly-28-percent-more-visits-in-the-week-following-googles-insistence-that-people-love-ai-mode/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;DuckDuckGo search saw 28% more visits after Google said people love AI mode&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (pcgamer.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48296649&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1071 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 521 comments · by HelloUsername&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DuckDuckGo’s AI-free search page saw a 28% spike in visits following Google’s claim that users love its new AI-driven search mode. While Google maintains 85% of the market, DuckDuckGo&amp;#39;s growth highlights a rising demand for privacy and the ability to opt out of AI-generated results. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pcgamer.com/hardware/duckduckgos-ai-free-search-saw-nearly-28-percent-more-visits-in-the-week-following-googles-insistence-that-people-love-ai-mode/&quot; title=&quot;DuckDuckGo&amp;#39;s AI-free search saw nearly 28% more visits last week, but Google is still king    &amp;#39;People just want a choice.&amp;#39;    ![](https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p/?c1=2&amp;amp;c2=10055482&amp;amp;cv=4.4.0&amp;amp;cj=1)    [Skip to main content](#main)    ![](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/fzlg0fzmx11773302065.jpeg)    ![](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/2mwhi9nob41771257147.svg)Join The Club    - Join our community    JOIN NOW    11    Premium Benefits    24/7    Access Available    28K+    Active…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on Google&amp;#39;s pivot to AI search, with some arguing the move prioritizes shareholder expectations and ad revenue over user experience by cannibalizing content from third-party websites &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48297961&quot; title=&quot;They want to capture more of the value that was previously going to others. That&amp;#39;s basically what this has all been leading to. Why let a cooking website get visitors and ad revenue when they are free to take the content and show it as their own? Now they are going to do the same to e-commerce. Either they are going to let customers buy their products through Google&amp;#39;s interface, or they won&amp;#39;t be discovered. No more ownership of the customer relationship. Stores will be a backend warehouse and…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48297452&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I truly don&amp;#39;t get Google&amp;#39;s move. Users aren&amp;#39;t adopting their AI at the rate shareholders expect, so they now force the adoption at the cost of search.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48298264&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Why let a cooking website get visitors and ad revenue when they are free to take the content and show it as their own? I think this is a step beyond that - why should people be creating cooking websites when you can ask LLM how to cook given thing, while indeed, serving their own ads. It&amp;#39;s the continuation of &amp;#39;we own content other people produce&amp;#39; policy&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48297450&quot; title=&quot;Search is not the golden goose. Ads are. If search was the golden goose, they wouldn&amp;#39;t be trying so hard to replace it with AI. Just because Google used to do search as their main point of business does not mean that holds true today. Holding on to the false premise will only add to your confusion about their decisions.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While Google claims record-breaking engagement with &amp;#34;AI mode,&amp;#34; critics suggest this forced adoption is driving even non-technical users to seek alternatives like DuckDuckGo to avoid unwanted AI interference &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48296986&quot; title=&quot;My friends who previously had no interest in technology and never talked about it, are suddenly following tech news closely all because they hate AI being pushed so hard. One was just messaging me this morning about alternatives to Google search and maps. He ended up downloading DuckDuckGo. If Google isn’t carefully they’re going to push people away from their golden goose.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48297664&quot; title=&quot;According to Google, users are adopting it. They say AI mode is the most popular feature they&amp;#39;ve ever introduced, and is driving an increase in total search queries. &amp;gt;Just one year after its debut, AI Mode has surpassed one billion monthly users, with queries more than doubling every quarter since launch. As people have realized just how much more Search can do for them, they’re searching more than ever before — so much so that last quarter, we saw queries reach an all-time high. &amp;gt;Another place…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some users appreciate the speed of integrated AI for quick queries, noting that the &amp;#34;AI skeptic&amp;#34; sentiment may be more prevalent online than in real-world social circles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48297908&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; because they have fear of missing out on AI That&amp;#39;s been my experience too, both with friends and coworkers. It would seem that the negative sentiment around AI is largely an internet phenomenon. I&amp;#39;ve yet to run into a hardcore &amp;#39;AI skeptic&amp;#39; irl. People seem either neutral, or enthusiastic about it.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48297399&quot; title=&quot;I actually like AI mode in Google. My main reason is if I just have a quick question it seems a lot quicker than logging into ChatGPT/Claude as I can just type it in the address bar. Of course DDG / others can do the exact same thing as they already have an AI mode. Maybe you can even set up ChatGPT as a search engine - not sure. The key for this use case is speed - it has to be nearly instant.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/may/27/canada-sweden-saab-globaleye-aircraft&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Canada to order military plane fleet from Sweden in shift from US suppliers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theguardian.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48296994&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;620 points · 485 comments · by tosh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announced plans to purchase Saab’s GlobalEye early warning aircraft from Sweden over Boeing&amp;#39;s alternative, signaling a strategic shift to reduce reliance on U.S. defense suppliers for Arctic surveillance. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/may/27/canada-sweden-saab-globaleye-aircraft&quot; title=&quot;Title: Canada to order military plane fleet from Sweden in shift from US suppliers    URL Source: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/may/27/canada-sweden-saab-globaleye-aircraft    Published Time: 2026-05-27T15:58:14.000Z    Markdown Content:  # Canada to order military plane fleet from Sweden in shift from US suppliers | Canada | The Guardian  [Skip to main content](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/may/27/canada-sweden-saab-globaleye-aircraft#maincontent)[Skip to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The decision to purchase Swedish aircraft is viewed by some as a strategic move to reduce dependence on a volatile U.S. ally that has recently imposed tariffs and threatened Canadian sovereignty &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48299145&quot; title=&quot;I can understand why this change happened. Even if American equipment is superior, there is a lot of value to not depending on a supposed &amp;#39;ally&amp;#39; which * Arbitrarily slapped high tariffs on all goods from Canada while exempting Russia and Belarus. * Threatened to take over the country by force. * Officially suspended the Permanent Joint Board on Defense between US and Canada because of criticism of US foreign policy by the Canadian PM&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48301678&quot; title=&quot;In the past countries would buy American equipment even if it wasn’t the best fit because that would make you essentially an American ally. Being part of the U.S. ecosystem was valuable. Unfortunately, over the last 1.5 years, the political value proposition has turned by 180 degrees.  - Being a U.S. ally no longer guarantees that you will be protected by the U.S.  as Ukraine is seeing. But the U.S. has been tearing agreements left and right and the President has openly said he may not respond…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others argue the shift is likely a pragmatic procurement choice, noting that Saab offers a &amp;#34;right-sized,&amp;#34; cost-effective solution for patrolling northern borders that the U.S. currently fails to match &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48299202&quot; title=&quot;We call this confirmation bias. The Saab is likely cheaper to operate as it&amp;#39;s a smaller plane and Canada only has to patrol its northern border.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48301645&quot; title=&quot;This is actually more likely a non-political procurement decision that looks like a political one. This is the &amp;#39;right size&amp;#39; for Canada and other nations - the US doesn&amp;#39;t offer a true comparable, and, looks like the US balked at buying the &amp;#39;kind of comparable&amp;#39; Boeing E7 putting it in jeopardy. With European military renaissance and the SAAB gear proving itself in Ukraine ... well, you see the shift. This is the shift writ large. This is going to happen across all industries. I don&amp;#39;t think it&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights a growing skepticism regarding the reliability of U.S. security guarantees and a curiosity as to why Canada, despite its vast resources, lacks the domestic manufacturing capabilities seen in smaller nations like Sweden &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48298630&quot; title=&quot;Now the interesting question to me is why is that a country with a tenth of population can have car, truck and military plane manufacturing yet Canada can’t, even with virtually all resources for inputs, including energy can’t.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48301027&quot; title=&quot;True. But we seem like the least trustworthy people on earth at the moment. After israel, anyway. Trump has nothing to do with it.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48301678&quot; title=&quot;In the past countries would buy American equipment even if it wasn’t the best fit because that would make you essentially an American ally. Being part of the U.S. ecosystem was valuable. Unfortunately, over the last 1.5 years, the political value proposition has turned by 180 degrees.  - Being a U.S. ally no longer guarantees that you will be protected by the U.S.  as Ukraine is seeing. But the U.S. has been tearing agreements left and right and the President has openly said he may not respond…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rubbishtalk.com/economy/how-private-equity-bought-americas-essential-services/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Private equity bought America&amp;#39;s essential services&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (rubbishtalk.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48292941&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;551 points · 553 comments · by NoRagrets&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Private equity firms have consolidated essential U.S. services like fire truck manufacturing, ambulances, and nursing homes, using a &amp;#34;buy, strip, and flip&amp;#34; model that prioritizes profit extraction through debt and cost-cutting, often resulting in lethal service delays and degraded public infrastructure. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rubbishtalk.com/economy/how-private-equity-bought-americas-essential-services/&quot; title=&quot;Title: How Private Equity Bought America’s Essential Services    URL Source: https://rubbishtalk.com/economy/how-private-equity-bought-americas-essential-services/    Markdown Content:  When a fire truck fails to deploy in a burning building and four people die, the cause isn’t just mechanical failure. It’s a business model.    On the night of June 26, 2025, firefighters on Tower Ladder 14 raced to a Chicago apartment building where an arsonist had poured gasoline on both stairwells. When they…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of private equity (PE) is largely driven by the need for pension funds to achieve high returns to remain solvent, effectively transferring current standards of living to fund retirement checks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48294273&quot; title=&quot;The irony is that PEs exist largely because of pension funds. So to sum it up (not so nicely) we are transferring value from our current standard of living to pay for retirement checks for our old folks. Pensions fund a significant part of PE and they do so because they need around a 7% return in order to look solvent. If they do not have the higher PE returns, they basically go out if cash in 10 years and everyone would scream bloody murder. But with the higher returns from PE they have 40-50…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48294588&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; we are transferring value from our current standard of living to pay for retirement checks Isn’t this just what happens when you have an inverted pyramid (older population is larger than the younger population)? &amp;gt; One can argue that PEs make the business more efficient I’ve never seen it (I agree with you). To improve something they’d have to understand the business and do a bunch of work. Mostly they show up at quarterly meetings and want spreadsheets that measure some number that will go up…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue PE can improve efficiency in early stages, users highlight a consistent pattern of &amp;#34;strip-mining&amp;#34; social capital, gutting quality, and tripling prices once the &amp;#34;squeeze&amp;#34; begins &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48294745&quot; title=&quot;One of the tools we use was bought by PE last summer. When it was time to renew our support contract had tripled in price. I use it across 10 projects so our costs went from $200k to $500k. I let our account manager know this was unacceptable but even his hands were tied. Cancelled those contracts and let them know we were retooling with a competing tool and opensource to fill those gaps. The impression I got was we weren&amp;#39;t the only ones. Sales were getting squeezed between customers bailing…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48294195&quot; title=&quot;Article doesn&amp;#39;t really dig into the angle I personally find most horrifying, strip-mining social capital. In my area PE is gobbling up mom-and-pop apartment complexes, plumbing companies, restaurants, and generally making customers and employees alike pretty miserable. Hard-working founders should be able to cash out, but there has to be a better system than this one. Succession, maybe. Not that we should push an unmysterious destiny on our children, but maybe more ought to consider pulling one?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Proposed solutions include returning to aggressive pre-1980s antitrust policies and banning leveraged buyouts, though others worry such restrictions could destroy the acquisition exit pathway for startups &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48293444&quot; title=&quot;End consolidation. Go back to pre-1980s antitrust policy. Encourage competition and bust the trusts.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48293512&quot; title=&quot;I simply don&amp;#39;t understand why leveraged buy-out(LBO) is allowed in the first place. It is like paying for the company with the money from the company you are buying.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48294056&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; How will that work - for example Y Combinator classes. They cannot be acquired? For the record: national economic policy shouldn&amp;#39;t revolve around Y Combinator classes and similar startups. I&amp;#39;m totally fine if it turns out a sensible antitrust policy completely destroys the acquisition exit pathway for tech startups. I&amp;#39;m not saying one will, but I&amp;#39;m saying that&amp;#39;s a cost I&amp;#39;m willing to pay.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/27/tech-ceos-are-apparently-suffering-from-ai-psychosis/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techcrunch.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48295679&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;718 points · 357 comments · by IAmGraydon&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Box CEO Aaron Levie suggests tech executives are suffering from &amp;#34;AI psychosis,&amp;#34; a delusion where distance from actual labor leads them to overestimate AI&amp;#39;s current productivity gains and automate roles before the technology is truly capable of outperforming humans. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/27/tech-ceos-are-apparently-suffering-from-ai-psychosis/&quot; title=&quot;Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis | TechCrunch    &amp;#39;CEOs are uniquely prone to AI psychosis,&amp;#39; Box CEO Aaron Levie opines. Maybe that explains the almost religious belief in AI productivity gains.    –:–:–:–    The first StrictlyVC of 2026 hits SF on April 30. Tickets are going fast. [Register now.](https://techcrunch.com/events/strictlyvc-san-francisco-2026/?utm_source=tc&amp;amp;utm_medium=ad&amp;amp;utm_campaign=svcsf2026&amp;amp;utm_content=ticketsales&amp;amp;promo=topbanner&amp;amp;display=)    Get Disrupt Early Bird…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current &amp;#34;AI psychosis&amp;#34; among tech CEOs is viewed by some as a natural extension of high-level management, where leaders are accustomed to pulling levers and setting directions without fully grasping ground-level processes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48297252&quot; title=&quot;If you manage 500+ people organization, most of the headaches with agents already exists with you - you set directions, ask people to go run fast in those directions, check in frequently and course correct on results without actually understanding those people do. Those aren&amp;#39;t the deal breakers. They entirely rely on the competence of the folks they hired and cross-match enforcers with the drivers they have - they deal with fallible people on both sides of that. The fundamental difference is…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48297480&quot; title=&quot;Yes this is why the higher level org functions are in love with AI. It&amp;#39;s very similar to the levers they had already, but is faster and more directly actionable.   The downsides being that the AI loses important control levers like &amp;#39;self preservation&amp;#39; via paycheck, career advancement, staying out of jail, etc. that were mitigations on catastrophic outcomes. It will delete your prod db faster and with a bigger smile than your most upset employee.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48296943&quot; title=&quot;whats being described is in no way unique to ai. &amp;#39; In other words, Levie’s theory posits, CEOs don’t really understand processes well enough to know what really can and can’t be automated. But that lack of knowledge doesn’t stop them from acting on their beliefs. &amp;#39; i have been in the workforce for a long time. this &amp;#39;theory&amp;#39; has been theorized since as far back as i can remember. its the premise of undercover boss. its the punchline of many r/maliciouscompliance writing exercises. the higher up…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While critics argue the term is a hostile label that stifles productive discourse &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48297190&quot; title=&quot;AI psychosis just a lazy term, much like Trump Derangement Syndrome. It sounds hostile while also removing any scope for productive discourse. Once you call someone a &amp;#39;psycho&amp;#39;, they are less likely to engage with you, and more likely to double down on their views.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest the &amp;#34;intoxicating&amp;#34; speed of AI tools creates a false sense of capability for non-programmers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48297112&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s hardly a tech CEO thing, and I dunno if &amp;#39;psychosis&amp;#39; is a fair or accurate way to talk about it. I worked with someone who was kind of a Shopify power user, managed the store, could do a lot of things, but wasn&amp;#39;t a programmer. She showed me how Shopify does that AI block generator now to deliver something that was like 65% done in a minute. I also have a friend who knows enough code to be dangerous in WordPress: he was able to vibe code an API integration, got immensely excited about it,…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. A key point of consensus is that AI lacks the &amp;#34;useful conflict&amp;#34; and self-preservation instincts of human employees—such as the desire to stay employed or out of jail—which act as essential safeguards against catastrophic errors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48297252&quot; title=&quot;If you manage 500+ people organization, most of the headaches with agents already exists with you - you set directions, ask people to go run fast in those directions, check in frequently and course correct on results without actually understanding those people do. Those aren&amp;#39;t the deal breakers. They entirely rely on the competence of the folks they hired and cross-match enforcers with the drivers they have - they deal with fallible people on both sides of that. The fundamental difference is…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48297480&quot; title=&quot;Yes this is why the higher level org functions are in love with AI. It&amp;#39;s very similar to the levers they had already, but is faster and more directly actionable.   The downsides being that the AI loses important control levers like &amp;#39;self preservation&amp;#39; via paycheck, career advancement, staying out of jail, etc. that were mitigations on catastrophic outcomes. It will delete your prod db faster and with a bigger smile than your most upset employee.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48297955&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It will delete your prod db faster and with a bigger smile than your most upset employee. You&amp;#39;re right, that was incorrect.  I&amp;#39;ve discovered my error.  I should have deleted the filesystem instead of the database. That hasn&amp;#39;t solved the problem either.  Let me examine my options.  I see there are cloud services involved in this project.  Decommissioning them will solve the problem.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://support.last.fm/t/last-fm-is-now-independent/118591&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Last.fm is now independent&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (support.last.fm)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48295892&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;816 points · 220 comments · by twistslider&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last.fm has transitioned into an independent company following a change in ownership, though the existing team, user data, and Pro subscriptions remain unchanged as the service continues normal operations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://support.last.fm/t/last-fm-is-now-independent/118591&quot; title=&quot;Title: Last.fm is now independent - Announcements - Last.fm Support Community    URL Source: https://support.last.fm/t/last-fm-is-now-independent/118591    Published Time: 2026-05-27T10:07:09+00:00    Markdown Content:  ## post by LAST.HQ 19 hours ago    [![Image 1](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex021/user_avatar/support.last.fm/last.hq/48/31696_2.png)](https://support.last.fm/t/last-fm-is-now-independent/118591)    Today, Last.fm begins a new chapter as an independent company. Ownership has changed,    …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users express deep nostalgia for Last.fm’s role in the 2000s indie scene and its superior recommendation engine, which many argue outperformed modern streaming services because it relied on human-tagged data rather than short-term, biased algorithms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48296229&quot; title=&quot;Man i love last.fm even though it&amp;#39;s been technically superseded (for most people) by Spotify&amp;#39;s recommendation features. It just fit so well in the zeitgeist of 2000&amp;#39;s indie scene, microblogs, early social media.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48296715&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think the recommendation engines behind Spotify, Youtube Music, etc compare to the recommendations I got from last.fm over the years. The algorithmic ones seem to have a bunch of issues that bug me as a long time music listener and someone with a large music library. - their memory is short as hell so you can listen to something for a while, stop and then it&amp;#39;ll suggest it to you later as something to &amp;#39;discover&amp;#39; - they are way too biased towards recently listened music and will replay…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48297632&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s because the recommendation engine that Last.fm used back in the day was made the incredibly expensive way: the entire corpus was hand-tagged and cross-linked by humans atop an enormous CDDB. Last.fm, Audioscrobbler, and MusicBrainz (the association engine) were all linked together.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some question the platform&amp;#39;s relevance in the streaming era, others maintain decades-long &amp;#34;scrobbling&amp;#34; histories to track personal taste evolution and utilize third-party visualization tools for deep data analysis &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48296567&quot; title=&quot;last.fm is one of my very favorite services. It&amp;#39;s rough around the edges in some parts, but I&amp;#39;ve gotten incredible value from it. A couple of websites built on it that  I check out from time to time: - https://lastfmviz.netlify.app/ - shows what you&amp;#39;ve been listening to as a grid of album covers. You can scroll down as long as you want. It&amp;#39;s cool to look back and remember where I was when listening to specific music. - https://lastfmstats.com/ - generates tons of rankings, line charts, racing…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48299874&quot; title=&quot;Is anyone using last.fm in 2026? This made sense when people were playing MP3s in their Windows Media Player or Winamp, but as 99% of the people just stream music now, what is the purpose of this service? It has been maybe a decade since I met someone who actually uses the service.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48296499&quot; title=&quot;I just think it&amp;#39;s beautiful that I can see all the music I&amp;#39;ve listened to since 2005 (back when it was still called Audioscrobbler, before the Last.fm rename). And I never stopped scrobbling in all that time! I love these kinds of stats and being able to see how my taste has changed across more than 20 years, since I was a teenager. I do miss the old community forums they had integrated back in the day, though.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A common grievance is that modern services like Spotify and YouTube Music prioritize &amp;#34;hot&amp;#34; artists and repetitive loops over the &amp;#34;deep cuts&amp;#34; and community features that once defined the Last.fm experience &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48296715&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think the recommendation engines behind Spotify, Youtube Music, etc compare to the recommendations I got from last.fm over the years. The algorithmic ones seem to have a bunch of issues that bug me as a long time music listener and someone with a large music library. - their memory is short as hell so you can listen to something for a while, stop and then it&amp;#39;ll suggest it to you later as something to &amp;#39;discover&amp;#39; - they are way too biased towards recently listened music and will replay…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48296430&quot; title=&quot;Last.fm used to be special, but this was a long time ago. Just tried to login, recovered the password and seems that its just a tracker nowadays. In the past I could listen to music and drop a comment, meet new people, etc.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48296800&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m 90% sure that music labels pay to &amp;#39;put their thumbs on the scales&amp;#39; with these recommendation algorithms in order to push their &amp;#39;hot&amp;#39; artists. I wonder how many of these problems are a result of that.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48296581&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve felt a serious reduction in quality of recommendations from spotify the past couple years. Maybe I&amp;#39;ll try last.fm&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/27/us/politics/fbi-arrest-cia-official-gold-bars.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;FBI arrests CIA official with $40M in gold bars in his home&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nytimes.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48302151&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;471 points · 387 comments · by cwwc&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FBI arrested senior CIA official David Rush after finding $40 million in gold bars at his home, though he currently only faces charges for inflating academic credentials and fraudulently obtaining military leave pay. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/27/us/politics/fbi-arrest-cia-official-gold-bars.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: F.B.I. Arrests C.I.A. Official With $40 Million in Gold Bars in His Home - The New York Times    URL Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/27/us/politics/fbi-arrest-cia-official-gold-bars.html    Published Time: 2026-05-27T21:01:10.259Z    Markdown Content:  # F.B.I. Arrests C.I.A. Official With $40 Million in Gold Bars in His Home - The New York Times    [Skip to content](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/27/us/politics/fbi-arrest-cia-official-gold-bars.html#site-content)[Skip to site…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discovery of roughly 280kg of gold and high-value watches in a CIA official&amp;#39;s home has sparked debate over whether the assets were personal corruption or &amp;#34;shadow money&amp;#34; from off-the-books operations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48303269&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s ~280kg of gold if anyone wonders&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48302984&quot; title=&quot;Maybe this is part of the shadow money. CIA has been working with business people since the beginning of Cold War and I wouldn&amp;#39;t be surprised that they have deep roots in the financial world -- after all both Intelligence and Finance need globalization.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48303536&quot; title=&quot;Guy sounds like a dragon. What&amp;#39;s the deal with the watches though?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48302702&quot; title=&quot;Sounds like he was most likely involved in some serious shit that was off the books and somehow it came to light. His boss is probably aware of what it was but no one will admit shit. It went awry and he is left holding the bag. Gold and money for an operation that could have been to anything from funding armed rebellion to god only knows.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters questioned how the agency failed to vet the official&amp;#39;s military background &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48303018&quot; title=&quot;How porous is the CIA&amp;#39;s interview process that they couldn&amp;#39;t validate the guy&amp;#39;s military discharge status?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, while others noted that luxury watches are a common global commodity for illicit transactions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304156&quot; title=&quot;Watches are the commodity of choice for corruption in some circles. I know people in jewelry and a significant portion of their transactions are watches to Chinese businessmen, formerly through Hong Kong, now through Singapore. They&amp;#39;re high value items with razor thin margins.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users argue this reflects a broader institutional decay, suggesting the agency&amp;#39;s reliance on morally flexible operatives inevitably leads to such criminal outcomes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48303551&quot; title=&quot;The type of people Intelligence agencies need and use to accomplish their goals are also the type of people who tend to do these things.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304186&quot; title=&quot;What a disingenuous way of thinking. Not falling for this is the basis of much religious text by the way. Splitting baby in the middle, etc. But on the other hand, being a useful fool that blindly does anything for profit, Do seem in line with the people working in tech for the last decade. Yes, the CIA is a corrupt today as &amp;#39;tech&amp;#39;. And no that is not ok nor required, or it ever was like that.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jacquescorbytuech.com/writing/what-apple-and-google-are-doing-your-push-notifications&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What Apple and Google are doing to push notifications&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jacquescorbytuech.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48299220&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;421 points · 408 comments · by iamacyborg&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple and Google have transitioned from passive delivery layers to active intermediaries that use on-device AI to summarize, reorder, and deprioritize push notifications. This shift reduces sender control and visibility, forcing marketers to prioritize factual, concise content and shift non-urgent engagement to owned in-app surfaces. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jacquescorbytuech.com/writing/what-apple-and-google-are-doing-your-push-notifications&quot; title=&quot;Title: What Apple and Google are doing to your push notifications    URL Source: https://www.jacquescorbytuech.com/writing/what-apple-and-google-are-doing-your-push-notifications    Published Time: Wed, 27 May 2026 18:03:13 GMT    Markdown Content:  I wrote recently about [what Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, and Apple are doing to your email](https://www.jacquescorbytuech.com/writing/what-google-yahoo-microsoft-and-apple-are-doing-your-email): how four providers stopped being transport layers and turned…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users express deep frustration with apps that exploit push notifications for marketing, arguing that interruptions should be reserved strictly for urgent, transactional information &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48299932&quot; title=&quot;If my phone interrupts me, it should either mean someone genuinely needs my attention right now or it should not be disrupting me at all. That&amp;#39;s my notification set up. Apps allowed to receive push notifications Phone,    Messages,    Whatsapp,    Apple Health,    [brand] bank. That concludes the list. There is no reason any other app needs to be able to instantly ping me. Most apps are not notifying you because something matters; they are notifying you because they want your attention. I do not…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48299526&quot; title=&quot;I feel like this article reads like the author is upset that Apple + Google prevent / control certain types of notifications (read: spam) &amp;gt; Cross-sell, upsell, education and discovery can work on push Push notifications should only be for transactional notifications. I don&amp;#39;t want another inbox for junk.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48301533&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, this entire article is pretty transparent that it&amp;#39;s from the sender perspective, and worried about platforms taking over &amp;#39;sender control&amp;#39;. Who is he kidding? The vast majority of apps have absolutely proven they can&amp;#39;t be trusted to respect your attention. From my perspective, the more roadblocks the platforms put between unnecessary notifications and my phone, the better. And I don&amp;#39;t think Apple or Google are some sort of heroes here, but I do believe their incentives better align with…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. A major point of contention is the lack of granular control; apps like Uber often bundle essential service updates with unsolicited advertisements, forcing users to either accept spam or lose functional utility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48300198&quot; title=&quot;The biggest problem are apps that do both. For example, I want Uber to notify me when my driver has arrived, but I don&amp;#39;t want it to notify me when they have a special 10% discount on my next 5 rides. It&amp;#39;s not straightforward to block one but not the other.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48300633&quot; title=&quot;No one willingly says &amp;#39;yes&amp;#39; to advertisements, but people will say &amp;#39;yes&amp;#39; to important-updates(-and-advertisements).&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48300271&quot; title=&quot;And the worst part is that Apple could fix this in a heartbeat. Uber is straightforwardly in violation of App Store policies about &amp;#39;no advertising in push notifications&amp;#39;, but a) they&amp;#39;re too big to fail and b) Apple advertises via push notifications all the fucking time, so they have no leg to stand on here. It&amp;#39;s infuriating that the one thing the App Store monopoly could be useful for isn&amp;#39;t even actually used in practice (if you&amp;#39;re big enough, ofc, you and me get to eat shit if we try to evade…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters advocate for aggressive manual filtering or &amp;#34;Do Not Disturb&amp;#34; modes, there is a consensus that platforms like Apple and Google should more strictly enforce policies against notification-based advertising &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48300793&quot; title=&quot;For me, it&amp;#39;s quite straightforward. If an app makes an unsolicited spammy push, it&amp;#39;s notifications-off. No exceptions.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48301620&quot; title=&quot;I’m constantly amazed how passive people are with things that steal their attention My phone is in do not disturb mode 24/7. If your app notifies me about something pointless, it gets deleted and I start using your website instead I have a mail rule that moves any email with the word “unsubscribe” out of the inbox into its own tagged area. Every few days, I go in and unsubscribe to everything that’s arrived. Whenever a retail point of sale worker asks for my details or phone number or asks me…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48299634&quot; title=&quot;I wish apple/google would implement better notification control - like the ability to turn off all marketing notifications, and a much better digest format&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48300271&quot; title=&quot;And the worst part is that Apple could fix this in a heartbeat. Uber is straightforwardly in violation of App Store policies about &amp;#39;no advertising in push notifications&amp;#39;, but a) they&amp;#39;re too big to fail and b) Apple advertises via push notifications all the fucking time, so they have no leg to stand on here. It&amp;#39;s infuriating that the one thing the App Store monopoly could be useful for isn&amp;#39;t even actually used in practice (if you&amp;#39;re big enough, ofc, you and me get to eat shit if we try to evade…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arps18.github.io/posts/claude-code-mastery/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Claude Code as a Daily Driver: Claude.md, Skills, Subagents, Plugins, and MCPs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (arps18.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48289950&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;441 points · 251 comments · by arps18&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This guide details advanced workflows for Claude Code, emphasizing the use of `CLAUDE.md` for persistent project rules, custom skills and subagents for specialized tasks, and the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to integrate external data like GitHub, Sentry, and Obsidian into the terminal-based agent. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arps18.github.io/posts/claude-code-mastery/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Beyond the Prompt: Claude Code    URL Source: https://arps18.github.io/posts/claude-code-mastery/    Published Time: 2026-05-26T00:00:00Z    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1](https://arps18.github.io/images/claude-code.svg)    [![Image 2: Hacker News](https://img.shields.io/badge/Hacker%20News-%237%20on%20Front%20Page-FF6600?style=flat&amp;amp;logo=ycombinator&amp;amp;logoColor=white)](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48289950)    Claude Code is one of those tools where the difference between a casual user and…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are divided on the utility of Claude Code, with some praising it as a significant productivity multiplier for tedious tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48292593&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been using Claude to work on a medium-sized (100+kLoc) codebase, and it&amp;#39;s a great productivity multiplier. Putting hours into creating a good AGENTS file is more improved results a lot. I find that over time it picks up the codebase quite well.  Tedious tasks that would take a day are now a matter of a few prompts. Still... I&amp;#39;m not ready to give it more autonomy. Even as it gets high-level things quite well, I still look at the code, give feedback, and have 3-4 rounds of tweaks until I&amp;#39;m…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt; and others criticizing the proliferation of redundant, AI-generated guidance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48293239&quot; title=&quot;How many times can I read the same shallow guidance written by AI on using a coding agent? Good god when will it stop&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. A major point of contention is the risk of vendor lock-in and whether developers can maintain a codebase if the AI service goes offline &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48291572&quot; title=&quot;What happens when you have a codebase made with claude using this setup and claude is down for let&amp;#39;s say 8 hours? Are you able to efficiently, smoothly and productively take over the codebase?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48293614&quot; title=&quot;Can&amp;#39;t wait to learn more about how to vendor-lock-in myself really hard into not being able to code without the help of a specific corporation!&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48291805&quot; title=&quot;What happens when you have a codebase made with gcc for let&amp;#39;s say 8 hours? Are you able to efficiently, smoothly and productively take over the assembly code?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a call for consolidation among the confusing array of commands, skills, and plugins, as some users find that simple prompting often outperforms complex, resource-heavy setups like LSPs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48295884&quot; title=&quot;We really need some consolidation around commands, skills, subagents, and plugins. For example, if you want to, say, review code, you have five options now: - Write a .claude/commands/review.md. Simple but deprecated. - Use a /code-review skill, either one you install or one you just write yourself (it&amp;#39;s just Markdown, after all). - Use the /pr-review subagent. Also just Markdown, but it runs &amp;#39;in the background&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;in parallel&amp;#39;, so it must be better, I guess. - Install the /code-review…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48296387&quot; title=&quot;Hey, Boris from the CC team here. I agree, we&amp;#39;re working on consolidating these. Going forward it will just be the built-in /code-review skill. Here&amp;#39;s how to use the skill on the latest version: /code-review # do a balanced code review. checks for bugs and inconsistencies, poor code quality, duplication, band aids, etc. /code-review --fix # same as above, but also fix the issues # choose an explicit effort level (defaults to your current effort level). all of these also accept --fix:…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48296604&quot; title=&quot;Hi Boris, what is the advantage of using /code-review vs just asking Opus to “code review”? As a casual user working on hobby projects, I struggle to keep up with the pace of changes and knowing what to use when. My default now is to use Opus for all coding (sonnet is fine but seems dumber) and to prompt it for everything I need. I’ve had great success with this but clearly I’m missing power user functions with the slash commands and such.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thran.uk/writ/hdid/2025/12/simcity-3k-in-4k.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SimCity 3k in 4k (2025)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (thran.uk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48297645&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;484 points · 202 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A new technical guide details how to run SimCity 3000 on modern Windows 10 systems at 4K resolution using a GOG-patched executable, D3D wrappers, and various configuration tweaks to fix graphical glitches, mouse acceleration, and missing music. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thran.uk/writ/hdid/2025/12/simcity-3k-in-4k.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Thranpages :: How Did I Do :: SimCity 3k in 4k    URL Source: https://www.thran.uk/writ/hdid/2025/12/simcity-3k-in-4k.html    Published Time: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 14:19:43 GMT    Markdown Content:  SimCity 3000 is the best SimCity. It&amp;#39;s built upon a souped-up version of the Sc2K engine. It features isometric art, crafted pixel by pixel. It strikes the right balance of features and complexity; it feels like it could be mastered but without coddling you. It also has a high resolution Jazzy/new age…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the enduring appeal of *SimCity 3000*, with users praising its isometric style for fostering &amp;#34;apophenia&amp;#34; and a mental simulation that modern, photorealistic city builders often lack &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48300511&quot; title=&quot;I love this game so much. One of the reasons I started to make a city builder* is because I don&amp;#39;t like where the genre is going. The focus on photorealism in modern city builders took away the apophenia, or &amp;#39;food for imagination&amp;#39; that was a core element since the first SimCity. As a matter of fact, Will Wright used to say that the real simulation runs in the player&amp;#39;s minds (or something like that). Sure, there&amp;#39;s something great about Cities Skylines that (at least with very powerful hardware)…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48298093&quot; title=&quot;I was surprised to see SC3k described as isometric like 2k.   I recall versions after 2k being &amp;#39;look anywhere&amp;#39; 3D, but I guess I missed some versions.  So many games, like Railroad Tycoon post RRT2 and Worms went full 3D and gameplay was never the same. I actually keep a Basilisk II System 7.5 Mac environment just so that I can play SC2k from time to time ...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some reminisce about the game&amp;#39;s music and the desire for high-resolution map exports &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48302155&quot; title=&quot;This looks great, I just bought a copy. While it&amp;#39;s downloading I&amp;#39;m perusing the listing, and I&amp;#39;m curious if this supports generating a large image/print of your finished city, like you could in SCURK (SimCity Urban Renewal Kit, which shipped with SC2K). One thing I particularly loved was printing out very large maps of my city to go on the wall :) Edit: I like the music a lot, and the little tutorial guy is endearing. One question, how do I move the viewport around? I tried scroll click drag,…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48302258&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s a super cool idea. Actually we have an internal thingy to export your city to blender, then we can have nice images like this one: https://microlandia.city/assets/press/keyart/t21.jpeg Maybe we manage to make something that doesn&amp;#39;t need blender (though it probably won&amp;#39;t look as cool) or we just stop dev-gatekeeping the function that exports the 3d file. Consider it done for the next point release :)&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others debate the safety and ethics of the author&amp;#39;s driving habits mentioned in a linked blog post &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48299323&quot; title=&quot;What a strange person, from the same author: https://www.thran.uk/writ/yarn/2025/03/road-rage-maxxing-or-... I don&amp;#39;t understand how you can feel morally superior by blocking the overtaking lane and letting people through if they&amp;#39;re respectful enough.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48299804&quot; title=&quot;Tailgating in a massive SUV is not disrespectful,  it&amp;#39;s dangerous to other person. Why encourage this behavior by immediately letting them through?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a nostalgic consensus that older Mac versions of such games often featured superior audio and graphics compared to the PC versions currently available on digital storefronts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48298352&quot; title=&quot;A small frustration I have with playing old games is that the GOG/Steam version is always the PC original and the Mac versions almost always had far better sound and music and sometimes graphics.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22391&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;All of human cooking compressed into 2 megabytes&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (arxiv.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48291225&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;441 points · 173 comments · by josefchen&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Researchers developed Epicure, a multilingual AI model that maps the relationships between 1,790 canonical ingredients across 4.14 million recipes, blending culinary co-occurrence data with chemical flavor compounds to analyze the global geometry of food. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22391&quot; title=&quot;Title: Epicure: Navigating the Emergent Geometry of Food Ingredient Embeddings    URL Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22391    Published Time: Fri, 22 May 2026 00:52:20 GMT    Markdown Content:  # [2605.22391] Epicure: Navigating the Emergent Geometry of Food Ingredient Embeddings    [Skip to main content](https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22391#content)    [![Image 1: Cornell University…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely criticize the project&amp;#39;s title as misleading, noting that the data focuses on ingredient pairings rather than actual cooking techniques, proportions, or preparation methods &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48293293&quot; title=&quot;The work is very interesting. The title is misleading. A better title would be: &amp;#39;all of human ingredients compressed into 1,800 primitives&amp;#39; There is little to substantively nothing about the actual cooking: preparation methods, proportions, etc. But the idea that tomato goes well with beef the whole world over is very interesting and useful for creating flavors that will go together, perhaps surprisingly. It will be a nice resource in the future.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48294459&quot; title=&quot;I have a wonderful book that explores this idea of an atlas of flavours that work together. The flavor bible. I can assure you that it does not contain 1800 ingredients in all of there combinations, but it does a remarkable job of covering a widely used selection of herbs spices vegetables and meats. I doubt a compressed version of the text would even be very large. The trouble I find with LLM generated recipes is they miss the nuance of the technique. Often the success of a depends on a single…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48294249&quot; title=&quot;I saw this on X/Twitter.  I do not believe that human cooking, and all of its techniques and ingredients and the various ways that things can be prepared in different cultural contexts can be compressed in to 2 megabytes. It is sort of like saying here is a 1GB model that can do tool calling and coding and then you try it out and it barely functions.  Yes, it technically is a 1GB coding model, but it isn&amp;#39;t a good one.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant skepticism exists regarding the &amp;#34;all of human cooking&amp;#34; claim, as critics point out the dataset lacks representation from Africa, the Arab world, and Southeast Asia, while relying heavily on AI translations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48295482&quot; title=&quot;Unless I&amp;#39;m missing something, there&amp;#39;s also nothing in the paper to indicate this is &amp;#39;all of human ingredients&amp;#39;? It looks like it&amp;#39;s 11 data sources covering a bunch of common cuisines, with the English + Chinese sources accounting for 90% (!) of the dataset. Among others, Africa and the Arab world are not present in the data (good for about 25% of the global population). Also, all non-English terms were AI-translated to English which is methodologically understandable but surely leaves room for…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48296914&quot; title=&quot;Leaving out Indian, Southeast Asian and Arab cuisine means this is nigh useless.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48294145&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;from 11 sources spanning seven languages, English, Chinese, Russian, Vietnamese, Spanish, Turkish, Indonesian, German, and Indian-English So hardly &amp;#39;all of human cooking&amp;#39;...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these flaws, some users find the underlying &amp;#34;flavor atlas&amp;#34; concept valuable for discovering compatible ingredients &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48293293&quot; title=&quot;The work is very interesting. The title is misleading. A better title would be: &amp;#39;all of human ingredients compressed into 1,800 primitives&amp;#39; There is little to substantively nothing about the actual cooking: preparation methods, proportions, etc. But the idea that tomato goes well with beef the whole world over is very interesting and useful for creating flavors that will go together, perhaps surprisingly. It will be a nice resource in the future.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48295247&quot; title=&quot;+1. On a side note (and maybe off topic), I am thinking about food pairing which is based on the idea that two ingredients sharing volatile aroma compounds or certain molecular families may have a potential sensory compatibility  (broccolis and strawberries for example). I&amp;#39;d love to test those ingredients and find some unknown food pairings. But .. time is what it is (for now).&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, while others suggest that cooking logic is better represented through dependency schematics or &amp;#34;recipe cards&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48293036&quot; title=&quot;Neat. I&amp;#39;m trying to compress recipes into little schematics https://leontrolski.github.io/recipes.html&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48293155&quot; title=&quot;Ahh - the dependency graph recipe card. These are excellent. I&amp;#39;ve imagined something like this forever. Always annoyed that recipes put ingredients in a giant undifferentiated list and then give an instruction like &amp;#39;mix the dry ingredients in a deep bowl&amp;#39;. For a while I expected there could be a good return on a good implementation of this, but now as soon as a strong interface itself is created it seems easy to copy.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.niemanlab.org/2026/05/erin-brockovich-made-a-map-to-track-data-centers-around-the-country/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Erin Brockovich made a map to track data centers around the country&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (niemanlab.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48287952&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;272 points · &lt;strong&gt;310 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by cratermoon&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Environmental activist Erin Brockovich has launched a digital tool to map operational and proposed data centers across the U.S., allowing citizens to report the local impacts of AI infrastructure growth. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.niemanlab.org/2026/05/erin-brockovich-made-a-map-to-track-data-centers-around-the-country/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Erin Brockovich made a map to track data centers around the country    URL Source: https://www.niemanlab.org/2026/05/erin-brockovich-made-a-map-to-track-data-centers-around-the-country/    Published Time: Thu, 28 May 2026 05:41:25 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Erin Brockovich made a map to track data centers around the country | Nieman Journalism Lab    *   [![Image 1: Nieman Foundation…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion is divided over whether data centers pose a genuine ecological threat, with some dismissing concerns about water consumption as &amp;#34;populist brainrot&amp;#34; while others argue that wastewater and resource issues are legitimate local concerns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48288619&quot; title=&quot;The Erin Brockovich page itself repeats the canard, on the front page, that these sites endanger ecosystems with their water consumption.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48288524&quot; title=&quot;This datacenter stuff is such populist brainrot.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48288821&quot; title=&quot;I mean, the wastewater issues can be real in some environments.  It&amp;#39;s not a completely insane idea and like all things can be reasonably discussed and mitigated.  It&amp;#39;s not like these things have the ecological impact of steel foundries or fruit orchards, but they&amp;#39;re not parks either. I do think the tech industry would be wise to do more outreach and less sneering, though.  Freakouts about AI (which ultimately is what this is) aren&amp;#39;t &amp;#39;rational&amp;#39; but they&amp;#39;re eminently &amp;#39;reasonable&amp;#39;.  This isn&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48288703&quot; title=&quot;Because they do.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics point out that comprehensive data center maps already exist and note the irony that Brockovich’s tool appears to be built using AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48288359&quot; title=&quot;Why go through the effort when such work has already been done? https://www.datacentermap.com/datacenters/ Not being negative. But isn’t there existing highly reliable data that already exists for this?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48288545&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s poetically beautiful that the tool was very very clearly built mostly if not entirely using AI&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users compare the environmental impact unfavorably to industries like agriculture, others warn that &amp;#34;upper stand&amp;#34; dismissiveness toward public anxiety over AI and its physical infrastructure could lead to social unrest or violence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48288821&quot; title=&quot;I mean, the wastewater issues can be real in some environments.  It&amp;#39;s not a completely insane idea and like all things can be reasonably discussed and mitigated.  It&amp;#39;s not like these things have the ecological impact of steel foundries or fruit orchards, but they&amp;#39;re not parks either. I do think the tech industry would be wise to do more outreach and less sneering, though.  Freakouts about AI (which ultimately is what this is) aren&amp;#39;t &amp;#39;rational&amp;#39; but they&amp;#39;re eminently &amp;#39;reasonable&amp;#39;.  This isn&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48288520&quot; title=&quot;People have gotten so intense with the anti-AI sentiment that I hope this doesn&amp;#39;t end up guiding people to places where they can exercise violence &amp;#39;for a just cause&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48289030&quot; title=&quot;If water is the problem then why are we ignoring how much water beef needs? If we measure per person use it is hundreds times more than data center usage in comparison if we measure in per person consumption&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/golang/go/issues/77273&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Go: Support for Generic Methods&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48291575&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;310 points · 270 comments · by f311a&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A new Go proposal suggests allowing concrete methods to have their own type parameters, independent of the receiver type. While these generic methods would not satisfy interfaces due to implementation complexities, the change aims to improve code organization and enable fluent, left-to-right API designs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/golang/go/issues/77273&quot; title=&quot;Title: spec: generic methods for Go    URL Source: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/77273    Published Time: 2026-01-22T23:13:22.000Z    Markdown Content:  ## Proposal: Generic Methods for Go    ## A change of view.    ## Background    For clarity, in the following we use the term _concrete method_ (or just method when the context is clear) to describe a _non-interface method_ declared like a function but with a receiver; and we use the term _interface method_ to describe the name and signature of a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The introduction of generic methods in Go is seen as a long-awaited fix for a surprising omission in the initial generics implementation, with users eager to apply it to data access and functional programming patterns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48293731&quot; title=&quot;This is great. Will be useful for data access methods! As for the detractors, from the first generics proposal this was called out as a &amp;#39;not now&amp;#39;, not never. There were questions of implementation. They aren&amp;#39;t a super large team, and they try to do things incrementally and do them well.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48297504&quot; title=&quot;This will finally let me make the monad library I&amp;#39;ve been dreaming of for years. Be afraid.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48293927&quot; title=&quot;Lack of generic methods was really surprising to me when I was first trying to use generics in Go. Nice to see it being actually implemented&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view this evolution as a positive sign of the team&amp;#39;s willingness to admit mistakes and improve &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48293359&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not a bad thing to realize that one can be wrong and then strive for change.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that Go&amp;#39;s history of &amp;#34;organically growing&amp;#34; features suggests it fundamentally lacked proper design from the start &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48293320&quot; title=&quot;slowly implementing all the things they said we didn&amp;#39;t need&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48293473&quot; title=&quot;Maybe, but personally I&amp;#39;ve become quite tired of programming languages &amp;#39;organically grown&amp;#39; as opposed to properly designed the first time. After a good decade of C then C++, I found ANSI CL (despite being a massive compromise and unfinished) much more coherent and complete than both.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48293729&quot; title=&quot;There’s a fine line between being willing to change your mind and getting the basics wrong. Go has repeatedly gotten the basics wrong.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. This debate centers on whether Go&amp;#39;s success occurred because of its simplicity or in spite of &amp;#34;glaring design flaws&amp;#34; like its handling of enums and its late adoption of generics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48293948&quot; title=&quot;Declaring a highly successful language as having the basics wrong means that you are not correct about the basics that were needed.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48294202&quot; title=&quot;Something can be highly succesful in spite of having glaring design flaws. Nobody is claiming go isn&amp;#39;t wildly succesful, but it&amp;#39;s _in spite_ of these issues. It was clear over a decade ago that iota, gopath, and lack of generics were massive kneecaps to the language; go changing it&amp;#39;s mind on those things isn&amp;#39;t progress it&amp;#39;s just getting the fundamentals wrong. A good example of where they&amp;#39;re kind of stuck is date formatting - it&amp;#39;s stupid, unclear, and likely a mistake, but it&amp;#39;s not a…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48294507&quot; title=&quot;Why is iota a massive kneecap to the language? It is semantically identical to enum in C and Typescript. The trouble is that Rust is older than Go and it was already confusing people into thinking enums and sum types are the same thing, so by using slightly different syntax, iota, Go avoided the whole confusion of users thinking that enums would behave like sum types instead of actual enums. Is your attempt at making a point that not having sum types is the massive flaw? Sum types are a useful…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.gingerlime.com/2026/stripe-seem-friendly-to-friendly-fraud/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Stripe is friendly to “friendly fraud”&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (gingerlime.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48287982&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;323 points · 233 comments · by gingerlime&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A merchant criticizes Stripe for failing to use documented evidence of &amp;#34;friendly fraud&amp;#34; to protect other sellers, alleging the platform ignores clear proof of chargeback abuse and offers no recourse beyond individual account blocks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.gingerlime.com/2026/stripe-seem-friendly-to-friendly-fraud/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Stripe is friendly to “friendly fraud”    URL Source: https://www.gingerlime.com/2026/stripe-seem-friendly-to-friendly-fraud/    Published Time: 2026-05-18T08:54:44+00:00    Markdown Content:  Friendly fraud is the laundered name for something that the payment system is not really able to prevent. Even though I’m pretty sure they can do way better. Particularly big and sophisticated payment providers like Stripe, with a mountain of signals.    I had a customer buy my product twice. It’s called…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users suggest banning specific regions to mitigate fraud &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48288658&quot; title=&quot;My suggestion is to just ban specific regions or countries and you can cut 80% of this fraud. I&amp;#39;m not going to name those countries outright but you should never ever be launching globally until you have these safeguards in place. Once you are known to be vulnerable to a certain scheme, it quickly becomes known in that region/country. Again and again I&amp;#39;m reminded why high trust societies remain high trust and why low trust societies rarely transform into high trust society.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that the majority of &amp;#34;friendly fraud&amp;#34; actually originates from high-trust countries like the US and Australia &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48289118&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve got 13 chargebacks over the last 4 years for my biz. Out of these, 10 came from US based cards. The other 3 came from Australia(my country). Be careful when taking verbatim advice from internet strangers.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48289300&quot; title=&quot;+1 almost all from the US. The strongest signal is whether they use an eBank/app that has a one-click button to report transactions as fraudulent. The Apple card(?) seems especially prevalent.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters disagree on Stripe&amp;#39;s culpability, with some defending the platform&amp;#39;s neutral stance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48288889&quot; title=&quot;The customer screwed you over, and then their bank did too.  Stripe didn&amp;#39;t.  I&amp;#39;m not sure why Stripe is getting blamed in the title and the article. Yeah, maybe Stripe could do more without Radar, but I imagine it could also be fraught if Stripe was in the business of blocking customers from their entire network based on one vendor&amp;#39;s complaint.  Obviously a lot could go wrong with such an approach.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48288445&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; They told me they don’t use evidence of chargeback abuse from one merchant to create cross-merchant fraud signals, or to take action against the customer’s card, email, or other details for other merchants. I&amp;#39;m  surprised they were able to get Stripe to actually state all of this clearly. It&amp;#39;s nice that Stripe actually communicates details like this. But you can see the logic behind why many other big companies would just respond with an opaque message like &amp;#39; thank you for your report, it…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt; while others criticize it for failing to leverage cross-merchant data to block repeat offenders &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48288416&quot; title=&quot;I got hit with a fraudulent chargeback (claim was the purchase was unauthorized and the person showed up in person to a class) and it was doubly bad because they paid via Link which means that Stripe actively verified them via 2FA. Can someone explain to me why Stripe (or a competitor) doesn&amp;#39;t offer a setting &amp;#39;refuse transactions for cards that have filed &amp;gt; x chargebacks with merchants this year&amp;#39;?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48288445&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; They told me they don’t use evidence of chargeback abuse from one merchant to create cross-merchant fraud signals, or to take action against the customer’s card, email, or other details for other merchants. I&amp;#39;m  surprised they were able to get Stripe to actually state all of this clearly. It&amp;#39;s nice that Stripe actually communicates details like this. But you can see the logic behind why many other big companies would just respond with an opaque message like &amp;#39; thank you for your report, it…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable anecdotes highlight how modern banking features, such as the Apple Card&amp;#39;s one-click reporting or confusing transaction names, may inadvertently encourage users to flag legitimate charges as fraudulent &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48289300&quot; title=&quot;+1 almost all from the US. The strongest signal is whether they use an eBank/app that has a one-click button to report transactions as fraudulent. The Apple card(?) seems especially prevalent.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48289512&quot; title=&quot;I had a friend with the apple card, and there were fraudulent charges on her card before she even used it. I think that caused her to over-scrutinize things. But (years) later I saw her using apple pay.  She had charges she didn&amp;#39;t recognize and would immediately flag them.  Thing is, I couldn&amp;#39;t help but think they might have been real charges with weirdly named companies on the transaction.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theverge.com/games/938340/valve-steam-deck-price-increase&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Valve raises Steam Deck prices&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theverge.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48297976&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;275 points · 277 comments · by droidjj&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Valve has increased Steam Deck OLED prices by up to $300, citing rising memory and storage costs, with the 1TB model now retailing for $949. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theverge.com/games/938340/valve-steam-deck-price-increase&quot; title=&quot;Title: Valve raises Steam Deck prices by more than $200    URL Source: https://www.theverge.com/games/938340/valve-steam-deck-price-increase    Published Time: 2026-05-27T17:32:48+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Valve raises Steam Deck prices by more than $200 | The Verge    [Skip to main content](https://www.theverge.com/games/938340/valve-steam-deck-price-increase#content)    [The…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The community expresses deep frustration and alarm over the rising costs of consumer electronics, noting that hardware now frequently increases in value after purchase rather than depreciating &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48298713&quot; title=&quot;Never thought I&amp;#39;d be living in a world where my tech hardware purchases INCREASE in value over the years.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48299681&quot; title=&quot;I just checked amazon and I paid $350 in Nov 24&amp;#39; for 96GB (2x48GB) 6800MT DDR5 which at the time felt quite expensive and a bit of a splurge but I figured I had my DDR4 kit for almost a decade so probably similar lifespan for DDR5. That same listing is currently $1300!!! When RAM prices are increasing like a crypto currency we have a real societal problem.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Many commenters attribute these price hikes to a shift in priorities toward AI hyperscalers, which they argue has strained supply chains and made personal computing increasingly inaccessible to the average person &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48298231&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think it&amp;#39;s much of a wonder why people are turning to &amp;#39;anti-tech extremism&amp;#39; as everything around them suddenly is no longer consumer priced. Seeing computing rise anywhere from 1.5x to 2x in pricing while the job market is fucked is enough to make me extremely bitter.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48298680&quot; title=&quot;Exactly. Not only have the prices gone up, they&amp;#39;ve gone up for no real reason other than some CEOs are attempting to take over society. The average person isn&amp;#39;t even seeing much of the upside of modern technology anymore, just the downsides. Gadgets no longer get cheaper over time, experiences no longer improve over time, and every new startup or innovation seems to be used to make their lives worse, whether directly or indirectly. The average person does not really benefit from recent AI tech…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48298839&quot; title=&quot;Don&amp;#39;t forget that this is all intentional and by design. If the tech oligarchs have their way we will all have no choice but to rent compute by the token within the next 3-5 years. The era of the personal computer is over. Current supply chains &amp;amp; production capacity can&amp;#39;t accomodate both the AI hyperscalers and regular consumers.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate the actual utility of recent AI advancements &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48298946&quot; title=&quot;Yes, consumer electronics are constantly increasing in price alongside huge inflation and everybody getting laid off, but have you considered the value in having a personal assistant AI agent that can lie about the time for your appointment and autonomously delete your entire calendar? Some compromises have to be made in the AI-driven future.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48299025&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;The average person does not really benefit from recent AI tech Really? Most people I know seem to have found the chatbots tremendously helpful. It&amp;#39;s much faster than researching via a bunch of google searches.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, there is a prevailing sense of unease that the era of affordable, owned hardware is being replaced by a &amp;#34;dystopian&amp;#34; rental model &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48299556&quot; title=&quot;Now imagine TSMC being controlled by China.  While I think it&amp;#39;s fairly low probability, the imagination does create some pretty dystopian scenarios.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48298839&quot; title=&quot;Don&amp;#39;t forget that this is all intentional and by design. If the tech oligarchs have their way we will all have no choice but to rent compute by the token within the next 3-5 years. The era of the personal computer is over. Current supply chains &amp;amp; production capacity can&amp;#39;t accomodate both the AI hyperscalers and regular consumers.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48299125&quot; title=&quot;This feels like a sign of something very bad happening soon&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.githubstatus.com/incidents/xy1tt3hs572m&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Incident with Pull Requests, Issues, Git Operations and API Requests&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (githubstatus.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48293080&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;335 points · 209 comments · by maxnoe&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GitHub has resolved an incident that caused degraded performance for Git operations, API requests, issues, and pull requests. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.githubstatus.com/incidents/xy1tt3hs572m&quot; title=&quot;Title: Incident with Pull Requests, Issues, Git Operations and API Requests    URL Source: https://www.githubstatus.com/incidents/xy1tt3hs572m    Markdown Content:  # GitHub Status - Incident with Pull Requests, Issues, Git Operations and API Requests    [](https://www.githubstatus.com/)[Help](https://help.github.com/)[Community](https://github.community/)[Status](https://www.githubstatus.com/)[GitHub.com](https://github.com/)    ![Image 1: GitHub…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The recent surge in GitHub outages has led users to observe that May has been an &amp;#34;impressively bad month&amp;#34; for the platform&amp;#39;s reliability, with some questioning if the service is being &amp;#34;run into the ground&amp;#34; following its acquisition by Microsoft &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48293149&quot; title=&quot;https://isgithubcooked.com Normally I defend GH in the comments of these incidents but it’s been an impressively bad month by their standards, even when you filter for critical components filter out sev-2’s and 3’s.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48293209&quot; title=&quot;Name one thing Microsoft didn&amp;#39;t run into the ground post-acquisition&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48293182&quot; title=&quot;May has been filled with critical issues. It seems it&amp;#39;s getting worse over time.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some blame the decline on corporate ownership, others argue the instability stems from an exponential increase in load caused by AI-driven coding and automated workflows &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48293268&quot; title=&quot;is it me or ever since AI coding became the norm, there have been way more outages with otherwise reliable services? I get downtime on Supabase every few weeks. Even Cloudflare. And now Github&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48293701&quot; title=&quot;Has nothing to do with Microsoft acquisition... AI usage has increased demand and load. More PRs, more Action runners, more of everything firing. GitHub just wasn&amp;#39;t ready for the scale and are now having issues catching up with it as it continues to increase exponentially.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Amidst the frustration, the &amp;#34;isgithubcooked.com&amp;#34; status page sparked a debate over modern web aesthetics, with users disagreeing on whether its design is impressive or merely a generic byproduct of LLM generation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48293453&quot; title=&quot;The UI of that page is so nice, should build a github competitor. The user profile / contributions and PR UX is pretty much the entire &amp;#39;hub&amp;#39; product since git is a fully separate offline app.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48293495&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The UI of that page is so nice Is it? Seems a text description of &amp;#39;Make a website outlining &amp;#39;How cooked GitHub&amp;#39; is with a modern style&amp;#39; to basically any LLM would produce exactly that UI and design, literally nothing of that design a human had any influence on, besides the ones selecting what training data the used LLMs was trained with. I think most of us who&amp;#39;ve tried using LLMs for web-design can recognize that style and design at this point, regardless of model actually used.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48293582&quot; title=&quot;What really grinds my gears is how easy it is to get better designs out of LLMs. But if you don&amp;#39;t ask, you get the default.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jonaharagon.com/posts/im-getting-into-mesh-networks-meshtastic-meshcore-and-reticulum/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I&amp;#39;m Getting into Mesh Networks (Meshtastic, MeshCore, and Reticulum)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jonaharagon.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48299638&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;376 points · 144 comments · by Panda_&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that while Meshtastic and MeshCore are popular for local messaging, Reticulum is the superior mesh networking protocol due to its global scalability, open-source nature, and ability to seamlessly route data across diverse mediums like LoRa, Wi-Fi, and the internet. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jonaharagon.com/posts/im-getting-into-mesh-networks-meshtastic-meshcore-and-reticulum/&quot; title=&quot;Title: I&amp;#39;m Getting Into Mesh Networks... (Meshtastic, MeshCore, and Reticulum)    URL Source: https://www.jonaharagon.com/posts/im-getting-into-mesh-networks-meshtastic-meshcore-and-reticulum/    Published Time: 2026-01-26T20:47:58.000Z    Markdown Content:  I love networking, a lot. So much so that I&amp;#39;ve run my own [ISP](https://www.triplebit.org/?ref=jonaharagon.com) since 2024, complete with its own ASN, IPv4/6 address space, fiber optics, etc.    However, do this and you quickly realize how reliant…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current mesh networking landscape is often viewed as a &amp;#34;tech demo&amp;#34; or hobbyist pursuit akin to early wardriving and CB radio, offering a unique space to connect with local enthusiasts without corporate influence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48301747&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; To be perfectly upfront with you, this post will be glossing over many Meshtastic and MeshCore features, because I feel they are both non-serious solutions compared to Reticulum for reasons I will explain later on in this post. Yeah, that&amp;#39;s the general feel I get every time I poke into Mesh*.  Neat radio tech, fun toy to find other nearby nerds, instantly-obvious problems that are fatal to growing beyond being that toy (or small specialized personal nets, where it&amp;#39;s totally fine).  They feel…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48305547&quot; title=&quot;I’ve spent my entire career in telco and networking and loved the rise of Wi-Fi (which we used spectacularly over long distances when the spectrum was clear to show off my mates in 3G/microwave backhaul), and have been keeping up with LoRA and related stuff (got a few HelTec boards), but all the recent meshtastic/core/etc. stuff feels a bit like the early wardriving community (and CB radio): fun, full of ideas, but without enough structure (or mass appeal) to take off. I do wish we had a…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48301934&quot; title=&quot;That weakness is a strength. Everyone you meet on a mesh is a real breathing nerd, who due to proximity has a lot in common with you. They are not trying to influence you or sell you anything How many places like that are left?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some critics argue these protocols lack the structure to scale, proponents highlight their vital role in emergency preparedness, noting that solar-powered, decentralized nodes can function independently of the internet and power grid &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48305547&quot; title=&quot;I’ve spent my entire career in telco and networking and loved the rise of Wi-Fi (which we used spectacularly over long distances when the spectrum was clear to show off my mates in 3G/microwave backhaul), and have been keeping up with LoRA and related stuff (got a few HelTec boards), but all the recent meshtastic/core/etc. stuff feels a bit like the early wardriving community (and CB radio): fun, full of ideas, but without enough structure (or mass appeal) to take off. I do wish we had a…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304054&quot; title=&quot;IMHO this article misses a couple really important points. First, if the mesh can use Internet or other transports then it will, and it will be built out in a way where these become a necessity.  If all you want is a silly new way to text your friends, then something like reticulum will be ok.  But if you want a serious solution for emergency response and free communication -- free as in &amp;#39;no one can stop me or control what is said no matter what&amp;#39; then building something independent from scratch…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite debates over practical utility, users are achieving significant technical milestones, such as establishing nodes with 200 miles of range &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48302674&quot; title=&quot;Set up solar nodes last weekend. 200 miles of range now. Nerds, mad ideas. Good times.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48302866&quot; title=&quot;What do you need 200 miles of range for?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://pop.rdi.sh/where-does-next-token-prediction-leave-us/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Where does next-token prediction leave us?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (pop.rdi.sh)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48288191&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;204 points · 198 comments · by 0x5FC3&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The essay argues that AI&amp;#39;s next-token prediction model threatens to strip humanity of its economic utility and creative joy by concentrating the means of production among a wealthy few, turning collective human knowledge into a rent-seeking tool that devalues labor and increases societal gatekeeping. &lt;a href=&quot;https://pop.rdi.sh/where-does-next-token-prediction-leave-us/&quot; title=&quot;Title: So, Where Does Next-Token Prediction Leave Us?    URL Source: https://pop.rdi.sh/where-does-next-token-prediction-leave-us/    Markdown Content:  ## Solved/Cooked    AI maximalists in some corners of the internet hate it when people refer to LLMs as just “next-token predictors” or “stochastic parrots”. It is instinctively taken as a pejorative. They use the words “solved” or “cooked” to signal the end of industries or classes of work that take real human creativity, expertise or effort.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that many people suffer from a form of &amp;#34;main-character syndrome&amp;#34; or inverted Gell-Mann Amnesia, believing AI will automate other professions while their own &amp;#34;special sauce&amp;#34; or domain expertise remains untouchable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48289902&quot; title=&quot;I have a more depressing theory. I think class is part of it, but I&amp;#39;m starting to suspect that a shockingly large number of people lack the critical thinking skills needed to think out the implications of this stuff. I say that because I&amp;#39;ve met so many people of the managerial class that seem to think it&amp;#39;s going to replace the annoying people they have to pay, but somehow they don&amp;#39;t think it&amp;#39;s going to come for them . It&amp;#39;s like we have some sort of society-wide main-character syndrome where a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48290243&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think its entirely class. I&amp;#39;ve met many people who have convinced themselves they have some special sauce--even in software! And even those who are insulated like doctors and plumbers don&amp;#39;t realize they&amp;#39;re still at risk from second order effects. What happens when half of their customers are broke? That possibility is not an exaggeration. Even if everyone re-skills over night, people will default on their mortgages at a scale greater than the &amp;#39;08 financial crisis. And that&amp;#39;s just one…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48289984&quot; title=&quot;Perhaps this is a form of Gell-Mann Amnesia (but kinda inverted) where everyone views AI as too inaccurate for their own niche , but perfectly fine for every other field that they know comparably little about.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Even if specific trades like plumbing are not directly automated, users warn of devastating second-order effects, such as massive labor market oversaturation and a collapse in general purchasing power &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48290243&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think its entirely class. I&amp;#39;ve met many people who have convinced themselves they have some special sauce--even in software! And even those who are insulated like doctors and plumbers don&amp;#39;t realize they&amp;#39;re still at risk from second order effects. What happens when half of their customers are broke? That possibility is not an exaggeration. Even if everyone re-skills over night, people will default on their mortgages at a scale greater than the &amp;#39;08 financial crisis. And that&amp;#39;s just one…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48290303&quot; title=&quot;Even if you are a plumber and we don’t automate plumbing, you’ll have half the population displaced and switching to plumbing. Everything that isn’t automated will be over saturated.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48290367&quot; title=&quot;Or average joe becomes DIY plumber with help of chatGPT and there is a lot less demand for plumbers then.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond economics, there is a profound sense of &amp;#34;indolence and apathy&amp;#34; as the removal of technical friction devalues the human joy of learning and craftsmanship &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48290295&quot; title=&quot;LLMs reveal an important truth that we were already deeply aware of. With this cognitive offloading, the interests that drive us lose their meaning. If friction disappears, there is no longer any desire, pleasure, longing, obstacle, or demand. It is indolence, and it goes by the name of apathy.   All these promises without even reaching an ideal! Could it simply be that this ideal is becoming impoverished?  The prevailing view is that « AI makes us stupid », so it’s actually a good thing if only…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48290652&quot; title=&quot;That’s exactly part of the feelings I have. I always loved to learn, dig subjects, debug, create. Now I feel something has been taken away and has no value. I feel indolence and apathy. In my company the CEO explicitly says that code quality does not matter. He doesn’t care as long as we ship fast and iterate. I am genuinely sad and feel I’m losing something and if I do everything like I used to do, I am pressured that I waste time.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest this optimism is a luxury of the protected managerial class, others point out that developing nations often view AI more positively than the West &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48289902&quot; title=&quot;I have a more depressing theory. I think class is part of it, but I&amp;#39;m starting to suspect that a shockingly large number of people lack the critical thinking skills needed to think out the implications of this stuff. I say that because I&amp;#39;ve met so many people of the managerial class that seem to think it&amp;#39;s going to replace the annoying people they have to pay, but somehow they don&amp;#39;t think it&amp;#39;s going to come for them . It&amp;#39;s like we have some sort of society-wide main-character syndrome where a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48289128&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;But lately I’ve been thinking if it is just a class issue? This cohort of people likely have a cushion that softens the concussive blows they are doling out right now. They perhaps have the luxury of a somewhat functioning government and a social safety net that they are witness to in all walks of life. Over half the world does not. Science and technology, I feel, has always had a certain apathy towards the plight the people at the bottom rungs. In the data I&amp;#39;ve seen, the US and European…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-26</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-26</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/business/spain-blocks-prediction-markets-polymarket-kalshi-over-lack-gambling-licences-2026-05-26/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Spain blocks prediction markets Polymarket, Kalshi over lack of gambling licence&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (reuters.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48279316&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1082 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 512 comments · by thm&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/business/spain-blocks-prediction-markets-polymarket-kalshi-over-lack-gambling-licences-2026-05-26/&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Critics argue that prediction markets like Polymarket incentivize destructive real-world manipulation, such as insider leaks, death threats against journalists, or even potential assassinations for profit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48280465&quot; title=&quot;These - especially Polymarket - should be illegal globally, as they incentivize people with power to manipulate the real world in horribly destructive ways to win a bet. I would not be surprised if people are murdered at some point to reap the payout of some related bet.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48281777&quot; title=&quot;Very close already. Death threats went to this journalist; seems someone bet on missile hits. https://factkeepers.com/polymarket-gamblers-vow-to-kill-jour... It also incentivizes leaks from insiders, sometimes endangering others. A soldier was charged for betting on a military operation. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/us-soldier-charged-using-clas... And of course throwing pro sports, but that&amp;#39;s been happening for ages. Sports has always been crooked: eg the Eupolus Scandal from 388 BCE.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some compare these platforms to illegal insurance policies on others&amp;#39; lives, others contend that the current liquidity is too low to influence powerful actors and that such &amp;#34;markets&amp;#34; are merely unregulated casinos &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48280536&quot; title=&quot;Yeah. You aren&amp;#39;t allowed to set up a life insurance policy on someone else&amp;#39;s life, or a fire insurance policy on someone else&amp;#39;s home. For obvious reasons. But buying an event contract that pays if someone dies or someone&amp;#39;s house burns down is fine?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48281182&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; as they incentivize people with power to manipulate the real world I would argue that the ratio between &amp;#39;power&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;money to be won&amp;#39; is too big (at least right now) for this to materially matter. No fortune 500 CEO is going to postpone a product launch so they can win $5,000 on polymarket. But some random guy will get his hair dryer to win a socially meaningless weather bet. It&amp;#39;s not discussed often, but the liquidity of these markets is often awful, and you can only win as much as people…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48281473&quot; title=&quot;Polymarket is a casino. A roulette wheel is not a &amp;#39;market&amp;#39;. You can&amp;#39;t beat the house.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents or skeptics of the ban note that private betting is a long-standing practice and point out the inconsistency in how stock brokers or specific insurance hedges are legally treated &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48280392&quot; title=&quot;They require no gambling license to be a stock broker on the Bolsa de Madrid stock exchange.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48280922&quot; title=&quot;Well, you are privately allowed to bet on whatever you like with another individual. That is indeed legally fine, though potentially distasteful. Polymarket is facilitating bets between people, not bets with the house. Gambling and insurance are both bets with the house.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48280948&quot; title=&quot;being pedantic here but &amp;gt; You aren&amp;#39;t allowed to set up a life insurance policy on someone else&amp;#39;s life, or a fire insurance policy on someone else&amp;#39;s home This isn&amp;#39;t really true.  Lots of people take out life insurance on others as a hedge for many reasons, small business partner is one.  Same fire insurance, we had a case where someone pledged a building as collateral and we took out separate fire insurance on the building so we&amp;#39;d get paid out immediately. I&amp;#39;m not sure where this false premise…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ericturner.dev/posts/cost-of-home-ownership/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The real cost of owning a home&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ericturner.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48281611&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;437 points · &lt;strong&gt;864 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by ggcr&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Homeownership involves significant hidden costs beyond the mortgage, including high loan fees, maintenance, rising taxes, and selling expenses that can exceed 10% of a property&amp;#39;s value. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ericturner.dev/posts/cost-of-home-ownership/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Real Cost of Owning a Home — Eric Turner    URL Source: https://ericturner.dev/posts/cost-of-home-ownership/    Markdown Content:  You&amp;#39;ve probably heard someone say something to the effect of &amp;#39;renting is just throwing your money away&amp;#39;. Don&amp;#39;t believe it. It&amp;#39;s a glib statement that simply isn&amp;#39;t true. There are so many hidden costs to home ownership that most people who have never owned a home don&amp;#39;t know about. If you want to make an informed decision about whether to buy a home or keep…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Homeownership is often described as a lifestyle choice rather than a purely financial one, offering psychological benefits like stability and the freedom to customize a living space &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48283734&quot; title=&quot;The benefit of owning a home is almost always psychological, not financial.  If you take the money you&amp;#39;d use for a down payment and mortgage and invest it instead (after paying rent) you end up in about the same place. But the psychological benefits can be huge.  You have much greater control over the place you spend most of your time.  You can change it to your liking.  You don&amp;#39;t have to worry about rent increases or owner move ins or any of that other stuff that renters deal with. And if you…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48282229&quot; title=&quot;On the other hand, renting comes with hidden (and some not so hidden) costs too. The main one for me is the inherent precariousness that comes with renting. You don’t know how much longer you’re going to be able to stay in your apartment, whether that be due to rent hikes or the landlord deciding that they want to give the apartment to their nephew or any number of other things. The constant low level stress of knowing that you might need to go through the hell of apartment hunting and moving…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48282163&quot; title=&quot;Beyond the financials, the psychological impact of both being able to make greater-than-superficial changes, and having extremely predictable payments for years without worrying about substantial rent increases, is substantial. I redid/improved the bathroom to exactly what I wanted. I renovated the kitchen. I added paneling to the walls. I added a few outlets to rooms that needed more. I wouldn&amp;#39;t do these things in an apartment, because rent could go up any year and exploit me for liking my…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While renting avoids the &amp;#34;constant low-level stress&amp;#34; of potential displacement, it lacks the unique financial leverage that mortgages provide to average earners &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48282229&quot; title=&quot;On the other hand, renting comes with hidden (and some not so hidden) costs too. The main one for me is the inherent precariousness that comes with renting. You don’t know how much longer you’re going to be able to stay in your apartment, whether that be due to rent hikes or the landlord deciding that they want to give the apartment to their nephew or any number of other things. The constant low level stress of knowing that you might need to go through the hell of apartment hunting and moving…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48285027&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If you take the money you&amp;#39;d use for a down payment and mortgage and invest it instead (after paying rent) you end up in about the same place. That is not the right way to see it. If you have the cash to buy upfront, then yes, real estate is not that good an investment, unless you have a loaded portfolio already and want to diversify a bit, get some high inflation hedge, etc. The real value of buying a home is leverage. That is, most people cannot go to a bank and borrow $500k. The bank will…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48285617&quot; title=&quot;Love that the two most solid pro-homebuying points I&amp;#39;ve ever encountered (jedberg&amp;#39;s about the psychological benefits, yours about leverage) immediately surface in an HN discussion. It&amp;#39;s probably worth making a closer comparison though: * Buying a House on Loan: commit to paying off a $450k loan over 30 years at 5% interest, with an immediate $50k down payment and the home itself as collateral. So ~$2500/mo payments, another 400k in interest by the time you&amp;#39;re done. Your home probably…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. However, owners face significant &amp;#34;hidden&amp;#34; costs in time and money, requiring disciplined maintenance and the management of unpredictable, expensive repairs that renters simply delegate to a landlord &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48285137&quot; title=&quot;Beyond financial costs, I was caught off guard at how much time home ownership took up. House maintenance and projects have taken up most of every single weekend of mine for the past few years. Part of it is simply that I bought a house with more space than the places I usually rented. More to clean, more to maintain, more things that can go wrong, etc. But the biggest thing is that I&amp;#39;m the only one in charge of maintenance. There&amp;#39;s no one person I can call for every single problem. Keeping…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48283319&quot; title=&quot;There’s also a psychological benefit of not having to worry about most problems. Sink broke? Call landlord to fix. Roof leaking? Call landlord to fix. And so on. You never have an unexpected $20k repair show up. And while I agree that it’s nice to customize things to your preferences, this has a downside in that it’s easy to get carried away and overspend. Might as well get the nicer finishes when you are remodeling, right? After all you’re paying so much for labor anyway. And you can’t have…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48282196&quot; title=&quot;It is suggested to set aside 1%-3% of your home&amp;#39;s overall value for repairs every year. Most people do not do this, and many homes thus slowly degrade in value. It is a fast track way to destroy potential generational wealth. Home repair issues also tend to be bursty (rule of three...). You&amp;#39;ll have a few years of nothing that&amp;#39;ll lull you into a false sense of security, then suddenly three major issues will come up. So far this year I&amp;#39;ve had nearly 10K in random expenses pop up (!!) and based on…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.oliverio.dev/blog/the-worst-job-interview-i-had&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The worst job interview I ever had&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (oliverio.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48285344&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;656 points · 549 comments · by oliverio&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A software engineer recounts their worst interview experience at a mental health startup, where a non-technical &amp;#34;culture fit&amp;#34; session devolved into an invasive, 90-minute interrogation about personal traumas and life challenges that left them feeling emotionally exploited and rejected. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.oliverio.dev/blog/the-worst-job-interview-i-had&quot; title=&quot;Title: The worst job interview I ever had    URL Source: https://www.oliverio.dev/blog/the-worst-job-interview-i-had    Published Time: 2026-05-26    Markdown Content:  May 26, 2026    The worst job interview I ever had wasn’t a knowledge meltdown, coding assessment failure, or a complete language misunderstanding with the interviewer (although I’ve had all of those, too). No, the worst job interview I had was something I can only describe as an unsolicited psych evaluation.    I’m an engineer, primarily…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that interview questions about personal life or trauma are almost always implicitly scoped to a professional context, and failing to &amp;#34;read between the lines&amp;#34; by redirecting to a work-related challenge is a failure of professional maturity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48287693&quot; title=&quot;This… was a mistake on both you and the interviewer. All interview questions - unless it’s impossible to twist your answer to fit this - is scoped to “… at work”. Nobody who asks “tell me about yourself” is asking you to talk about how you met your partner, how many cats you have, or that experience you had, that one time, at band camp. It would be redundant and awkward to literally say “… at work” at the end of every question. It’s totally 100% the intent of the interviewer. This is…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48287077&quot; title=&quot;I fail to recall the exact wording of the discussion topics, but they were, in fact, non-technical — covering such lovely topics as the hardest day of my life, my biggest life challenges, and other similar “trauma-baiting” questions. Ha, I don&amp;#39;t think anyone who asks these questions expects that you&amp;#39;ll respond in a fully unfiltered way... These kinds of questions are part and parcel of non-tech interview processes. You can redirect with some subtlety &amp;#39;Well, my hardest ever day at work was...&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest that intrusive or &amp;#34;trauma-baiting&amp;#34; questions are abusive red flags that warrant an immediate exit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48287854&quot; title=&quot;And even if, for the sake of argument, they legitimately did ask about your personal life instead of your work life... you normally wouldn&amp;#39;t answer any of that. (In fact, it could very well mean the end of the interview, from the interviewee&amp;#39;s side.) That&amp;#39;s vastly overstepping commonly accepted boundaries. Sure, some surface level smalltalk is normal and expected: &amp;#39;Any hobbies? Ah, you like hiking? Nice. Where do you like to hike? Oh, I did that, too. Might I suggest hiking there and there? I…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48286918&quot; title=&quot;There is, and should be, a red flag for these situations. No make that RED flag. If you go into an interview that leaves you feeling the least bit helpless or at someone&amp;#39;s mercy then run screaming. Not politely, not quietly. Just say to calmly to the person that you find the situation abusive. It is. As you go out, if you see anyone or have a chance to talk to anyone, just tell them you found that your interviewer to be personally abusive. That you will not be willing to take the position if it…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others note that candidates must often tolerate imperfect processes out of a practical need for employment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48287001&quot; title=&quot;Are you being glib or unrealistic? You&amp;#39;re going to find many red flags for any job, perhaps severe flags. But you need a job. Or you have to roll the dice because you have deep knowledge of the red flags for your current job. Who finds 10/10 perfect jobs via an application process? Note: I probably shouldn&amp;#39;t be commenting since I don&amp;#39;t need to apply for jobs and conditions here are likely different from yours.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable anecdotes include a candidate walking out mid-whiteboard session due to poor cultural fit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48287204&quot; title=&quot;I was excited, it was a game company, and I&amp;#39;d wanted to get back into games - or more specifically, game engines - for a few years.  The tech of this particular company was interesting, an in-house engine developed by wunderkind, of course, and they&amp;#39;d invited me for an interview because I had done a fair bit of low-level work, which would be handy for their rough edges.  Apparently. Half way through the interview, I had an epiphany.  I really didn&amp;#39;t want to work there.  It was cultural, it just…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, an interviewer demanding a list of the last ten books read &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48287044&quot; title=&quot;Beats my worst interview. For some reason I mentioned that I like reading. The guy then demanded to list the last ten books I read. I just named ten random books that I had read at some point in my life, even in childhood. Pretty bizarre. Glad I didn’t get that job.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, and a CEO insisting on a final &amp;#34;yay or nay&amp;#34; meeting for every hire &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48287412&quot; title=&quot;I had something similar years ago. I applied for a job at a company, size around 150 people. Did two rounds of interviews which were great. They wanted me to offer the role. However, as a third round, I was going to do a meet and greet with the CEO and he was going to yay or nay me. At point I dropped out. If a CEO can&amp;#39;t trust his delegate managers to hire the people they see fit for a role, then thanks but no thanks. That&amp;#39;s not a company culture I want to spend most of my waking hours in.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://medium.com/@jakeorlowitz/wikipedia-is-doing-the-capitalist-thing-56a393232943&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Big tech&amp;#39;s anti-labor playbook has come for Wikipedia&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (medium.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48285592&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;575 points · 346 comments · by cdrnsf&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Wikimedia Foundation is facing a potential strike from Wikipedia editors after firing several union organizers, including its first employee, despite holding nearly $300 million in reserves and seeing increased profits from AI companies using its data. &lt;a href=&quot;https://medium.com/@jakeorlowitz/wikipedia-is-doing-the-capitalist-thing-56a393232943&quot; title=&quot;Title: Big Tech’s Anti-Labor Playbook Has Come for Wikipedia    URL Source: https://medium.com/@jakeorlowitz/wikipedia-is-doing-the-capitalist-thing-56a393232943    Published Time: 2026-05-26T15:41:37Z    Markdown Content:  [![Image 1: Jake Orlowitz](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fill:32:32/1*LnPazIr8taxICDDkJbamQw.jpeg)](https://medium.com/@jakeorlowitz?source=post_page---byline--56a393232943---------------------------------------)    6 min read    13 hours ago    Press enter or click to view image in…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) faces a labor crisis as editors strike over the loss of technical support and a shift in organizational priorities toward emerging markets and &amp;#34;Abstract Wikipedia&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48287278&quot; title=&quot;I spent ~2 years actively editing Wikipedia for multiple hours every day. I remember taking my laptop out at airports for 20 minutes between transfers, just to tweak an article or improve a source. While I originally started because I found some articles lackluster, I quickly realized how vigorous the editing process could be on controversial topics. For what simple HTML you see on the surface, you would be absolutely shocked to see how many hundreds of thousands of hours are spent to create an…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48286774&quot; title=&quot;Some English Wikipedia (enwiki) editors are striking. They are predominantly non-technical that are forced to maintain their own shadow IT-style infrastructure that Wikimedia (nonprofit owners of Wikipedia) doesn&amp;#39;t provide. It is very difficult to be a productive editor without custom tooling at this point. The reason why is because the laid off team maintained the Community Wishlist, the main way for editors to feature request for &amp;#39;professional&amp;#39; solutions. The Wikimedia Foundation also…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that non-profits exploit mission-driven workers and require unions for protection &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48286729&quot; title=&quot;On the countrary, nonprofits need unions more than for profits. They exploit their workers more. They have fewer resources and exploit their mission to get more work from their workers.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others worry that unionization could &amp;#34;capture&amp;#34; the organization or divert donations away from the encyclopedia&amp;#39;s core mission &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48286671&quot; title=&quot;17 months of operating expenses are actually not a lot for a foundation. Especially one whose goal is to preserve something for a long horizon. Unions exist to combat the monopsony power of corporations. Corporations and unions can exist in constant tension with each other because ultimately both are bound by the market of their product. I don&amp;#39;t think the logic holds up when you&amp;#39;re talking about foundations or charities. I&amp;#39;m donating to Wikipedia because I want to advance their cause. If the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48286259&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; &amp;#39;Wikipedia’s workers are fighting to unionize because the institution hosting the world’s encyclopedia has started acting like a regular employer at exactly the moment when the world most needs it to act like something better. &amp;gt; &amp;#39;The encyclopedia belongs to everyone. The labor that sustains it deserves the same protection.&amp;#39; If Wikipedia has excess reserves, that money should be directed to a worthy cause, not just the people at its office. The labor that sustains it is made up of many more…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. This internal tension is exacerbated by a perceived &amp;#34;terminal decline&amp;#34; in editor retention, which some attribute to a hostile environment for new contributors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48286774&quot; title=&quot;Some English Wikipedia (enwiki) editors are striking. They are predominantly non-technical that are forced to maintain their own shadow IT-style infrastructure that Wikimedia (nonprofit owners of Wikipedia) doesn&amp;#39;t provide. It is very difficult to be a productive editor without custom tooling at this point. The reason why is because the laid off team maintained the Community Wishlist, the main way for editors to feature request for &amp;#39;professional&amp;#39; solutions. The Wikimedia Foundation also…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48286831&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Why is Wikipedia losing contributors Perhaps because their message to new contributors is a consistent &amp;#39;stop trying to make corrections, and go away&amp;#39;?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.politico.eu/article/netherlands-blocks-us-takeover-vital-digital-supplier/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Netherlands blocks US takeover of vital digital supplier&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (politico.eu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48278406&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;607 points · 233 comments · by vrganj&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Dutch government has blocked the acquisition of IT supplier Solvinity by U.S.-based Kyndryl, citing public interest risks because the firm manages the infrastructure for the country’s vital DigiD online authentication app. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.politico.eu/article/netherlands-blocks-us-takeover-vital-digital-supplier/&quot; title=&quot;Netherlands blocks US takeover of vital digital supplier    Across Europe, there have been increased concerns about the bloc’s reliance on American tech.    ![](https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=394368290733607&amp;amp;ev=PageView&amp;amp;noscript=1)  [Skip to main content](#main)    Advertisement    Menu    Search for:    Submit    Edition: Europe    * [Europe](https://www.politico.eu?no-geo-redirect)  * [UK](https://www.politico.eu/uk/)  * [France](https://www.politico.eu/france-politics-news/)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Dutch government’s decision to block the US takeover of Solvinity follows intense public and parliamentary pressure to protect the DigiD e-ID system from US data access laws &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48278953&quot; title=&quot;Finally! The entire country has been clamouring for this for weeks, and the government has been completely silent about it. A couple of weeks ago, the entire parliament (with only a single party dissenting) voted for a motion to end the contract with Solvinity, but the government extended it anyway, leaving blocking the takeover as the only option, and there wasn&amp;#39;t a lot of confidence that the government would do that. The whole reason for this is that Solvinity host DigiD, the Dutch e-ID…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48279087&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; A couple of weeks ago, the entire parliament (with only a single party dissenting) voted for a motion to end the contract with Solvinity, but the government extended it anyway, leaving blocking the takeover as the only option, Given what we know now, this seems perfectly logical. It&amp;#39;s just that we don&amp;#39;t know what else is going on behind the scenes. I&amp;#39;m sure there was some negotiations on how to keep the data separate or something, with the threat of blocking it altogether as a final solution.…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some celebrate the move as a necessary step for digital sovereignty, critics argue the decision may be overturned in court as hypocritical given the government&amp;#39;s extensive existing reliance on Microsoft infrastructure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48279715&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Finally! You are behind the curve. You read here first. Lets revisit this comment in 2 years... This will be overturned by both Dutch and European courts after the company appeals, and  specially after Mark Rutte Daddy calls. The only purpose of this action is for the Dutch government to save face, and its for internal consumption. They already have the internal legal advice stating this, hidden away in some closet. But then they will say: You see, we wanted to do it but a court blocked us.…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. The situation highlights a deeper struggle with vendor lock-in and the difficulty of maintaining state-run IT services due to uncompetitive government pay scales &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48279639&quot; title=&quot;It is a bit more complex tham that. Logius is the company that actually owns and manages the DigiD stack, it&amp;#39;s just that they hired Solvinity for their expertise. AFAIK Solvinity can&amp;#39;t access the data. I can&amp;#39;t find it right now, but on Tweakers there was a long comment by someone on the inside that explained Logius basically had almost no know-how of how the current stack works, and there&amp;#39;s lots of bespoke stuff. Basically classic vendor lock-in. The government (rather, Logius) now really wants…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48279774&quot; title=&quot;If it&amp;#39;s such a vital piece of Dutch infrastructure, why is it in private hands at all?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48280312&quot; title=&quot;Because too few IT capable people are willing to work under the government&amp;#39;s pay scales; in most cases going private / corporate earns more. So most Dutch IT projects end up with private companies, which also means that, in the case of DigID and the secure / official messaging platform, the hosting party can charge exorbitant rates. Did you know it costs 25 cents to send a message via the Berichtenbox? So when the government does its annual &amp;#39;it&amp;#39;s time to fill in your taxes&amp;#39; message, they have…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/26/dropbox-ceo-drew-houston-ashraf-alkarmi.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Dropbox CEO Drew Houston to step down&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cnbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48279453&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;373 points · &lt;strong&gt;442 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by aghuang&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dropbox co-founder Drew Houston is stepping down as CEO and will be succeeded by Ashraf Alkarmi. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/26/dropbox-ceo-drew-houston-ashraf-alkarmi.html&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;blog.dropbox.com&amp;amp;#x2F;topics&amp;amp;#x2F;company&amp;amp;#x2F;dropbox-leadership-update&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;blog.dropbox.com&amp;amp;#x2F;topics&amp;amp;#x2F;company&amp;amp;#x2F;dropbox-leadership-u...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;twitter.com&amp;amp;#x2F;drewhouston&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2059275240065425474?s=20&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;twitter.com&amp;amp;#x2F;drewhouston&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2059275240065425474?s...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters attribute Dropbox&amp;#39;s stagnant growth to a saturated market where tech giants like Apple, Google, and Microsoft offer deeply integrated alternatives, leaving little room for independent expansion or acquisition &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48284315&quot; title=&quot;Dropbox&amp;#39;s stock has been stuck at around $6B valuation for years with flat growth and income around $2.5B per year.  It is just stuck. Box.com, which is quite similar, is not that different.  Around $3B and $1.2B in income.  Similar valuation. I think it is the market, not the leadership. It is a tough market that has cut off the consumer end because all the big players have their own deeply integrated solutions: Apple (iCloud), Google (Drive), Microsoft (OneDrive). Not sure where to go since…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite this, many users argue that Dropbox remains technically superior due to features like block-level syncing and a more polished user experience compared to &amp;#34;junk&amp;#34; competitors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48283389&quot; title=&quot;Having just rsync&amp;#39;d 100s of GBs back down from B2 and not sure where to put it, and having lots and lots of business documents and video files to share with collaborators, I&amp;#39;m surprised how few competitors there are in the Dropbox space. With their block level syncing, Dropbox is still not really replicated in the market. I&amp;#39;d only take issue with their price given the volumes of data I&amp;#39;m dealing with. Being able to set local and not-local flags on files/folders is great. I spent some time…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48283430&quot; title=&quot;it really is too bad. All of the major tech companies&amp;#39; competitors are junk. Google Drive is the least bad of the bunch (out of, say, OneDrive, iCloud, and formerly Amazon Drive), but it&amp;#39;s still not great to deal with. DropBox really does do a great job&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights a growing frustration with automated support systems, noting that viral social media pleas are often the only way to resolve critical account issues &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48284358&quot; title=&quot;If there are any Dropboxers here (drew—I emailed you a few weeks ago, but I imagine you&amp;#39;re busy): I went to prison for 18 months, my digital and physical life was stolen from me: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45451567 applies to my Dropbox account (and Apple but separate problem); I just received the &amp;#39;your account will be going bye-bye&amp;#39; email. I have very important dead-mom-club stuff in there, and support is useless. :( Edit: Thanks unofficial Dropbox support channel; thanks Drew :)…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48284384&quot; title=&quot;sad that going viral on social media is the only functional support system for many tech companies. good luck hope you get your mom&amp;#39;s stuff.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.signalbloom.ai/posts/outsourcing-plus-localai-will-soon-become-more-economical-vs-frontier-labs/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Outsourcing plus local AI will soon become more economical vs. frontier labs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (signalbloom.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48278610&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;323 points · &lt;strong&gt;370 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by GodelNumbering&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am unable to summarize this story because the provided link returned a &amp;#34;403 Forbidden&amp;#34; error, and the content is currently blocked by a JavaScript and cookie requirement. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.signalbloom.ai/posts/outsourcing-plus-localai-will-soon-become-more-economical-vs-frontier-labs/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Just a moment...    URL Source: https://www.signalbloom.ai/posts/outsourcing-plus-localai-will-soon-become-more-economical-vs-frontier-labs/    Warning: Target URL returned error 403: Forbidden  Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.    Markdown Content:  Enable JavaScript and cookies to continue&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on whether frontier models are pricing themselves out of the market, noting that current subscription models are significantly cheaper than API rates but likely unsustainable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48280551&quot; title=&quot;When discussing LLM pricing, people are missing the plot. The subscription token price is 10x-40x cheaper than API pricing. Your 90$ Claude subscriptions give you close to $1000 to $4000 in equivalent API token pricing. The second issue is that the quality of the model “operator” makes a massive difference in the outcomes. Highly skilled senior devs who know how to prompt and have high agency will outperform team people that lack motivation and foundational skills. Lastly, there is a massive…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48278959&quot; title=&quot;The current closed source frontier models are more capable than the latest from DeepSeek. But is the capability difference enough to justify a 30x price difference? &amp;#39;Frontier models&amp;#39; are caught in a financial dilemma of their own making --- they have spent such huge sums on development and as a result, they may have inadvertently priced themselves out of the market. Energy costs are a huge factor for AI. He who has the lowest energy costs will likely be able to dictate market prices. And fossil…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48280582&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; When discussing LLM pricing, people are missing the plot. [ ... snipped ...] Your 90$ Claude subscriptions give you close to $1000 to $4000 in equivalent API token pricing. And you think it is unreasonable to consider this unsustainable?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48281455&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The subscription token price is 10x-40x cheaper than API pricing This is a temporary phenomenon. Expect either drastic price increases or draconian throttling or both in the coming months. These companies are operating at huge loses and have hundreds of billions in liabilities and commitments. They need to turn on the money faucet sooner than later.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that local or smaller models like DeepSeek cannot yet match the reasoning and determinism of SOTA models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48280551&quot; title=&quot;When discussing LLM pricing, people are missing the plot. The subscription token price is 10x-40x cheaper than API pricing. Your 90$ Claude subscriptions give you close to $1000 to $4000 in equivalent API token pricing. The second issue is that the quality of the model “operator” makes a massive difference in the outcomes. Highly skilled senior devs who know how to prompt and have high agency will outperform team people that lack motivation and foundational skills. Lastly, there is a massive…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48280856&quot; title=&quot;I have really been trying to get local models to work. I have tried different harnesses, tooling, skills, prompts, etc. But when I compare claude code with anthropic models or codex with gpt 5.5, vs qwen, glm or gemma and the same harnesses, the frontier models come out massively ahead. I am at the point where I just don&amp;#39;t see the point of the non-frontier models, they waste more time than they save.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest that the massive cost difference may soon make frontier models economically unviable for many businesses &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48278959&quot; title=&quot;The current closed source frontier models are more capable than the latest from DeepSeek. But is the capability difference enough to justify a 30x price difference? &amp;#39;Frontier models&amp;#39; are caught in a financial dilemma of their own making --- they have spent such huge sums on development and as a result, they may have inadvertently priced themselves out of the market. Energy costs are a huge factor for AI. He who has the lowest energy costs will likely be able to dictate market prices. And fossil…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48281141&quot; title=&quot;Depends on what their actual costs are. Either they are losing lots of money on subscriptions, or they make absolute bank on API pricing. Looking at the pricing of 1-2T models like Kimi or DeepSeek on the open market, I&amp;#39;m tempted to assume that inference costs are closer to subscription pricing than to API pricing. Especially considering that subscriptions a) distribute load over time via rate limits, and b) will include a lot of users who get only a fraction of the possible value, whether they…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. A notable anecdote highlights that enterprise plans often bill at high API rates rather than flat subscription fees, leading to monthly costs of hundreds of dollars per user for basic operational tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48280906&quot; title=&quot;I learned today that the Anthropic &amp;#39;Enterprise&amp;#39; plan - the one big companies use because they need governance features and audit logs and all of that jazz - is billed at API token rates (plus $20/seat/month). So large companies are getting billed a lot more than those discount subscription plans.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48281049&quot; title=&quot;Anything over 150 seats means you need to pay at token rates plus the $20/user. My day job is operational (no coding at all) and I&amp;#39;m spending ~$300 a month on a few chats with Claude/Cowork a day over the course of a month.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://9to5google.com/2026/05/25/motorola-amazon-app-hijacking-behavior/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Motorola phones have started hijacking the Amazon app to insert affiliate codes&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (9to5google.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48274794&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;406 points · 232 comments · by Cider9986&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An update to Motorola&amp;#39;s pre-installed Smart Feed app is reportedly hijacking the Amazon app to inject affiliate codes via a brief browser redirect. &lt;a href=&quot;https://9to5google.com/2026/05/25/motorola-amazon-app-hijacking-behavior/&quot; title=&quot;Motorola phones have started hijacking the Amazon app to insert affiliate codes [Video]    A truly bizarre situation on Motorola phones has led to the software hijacking the Amazon app to inject an affiliate...    [Skip to main content](#main)    Toggle main menu    [9to5Google Logo Go to the 9to5Google home page](https://9to5google.com/)     Switch site    * [9to5Mac Logo9to5Mac](https://9to5mac.com)  * [9to5Toys](https://9to5toys.com)  * [Electrek](https://electrek.co)  * [Drone DJ…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users express frustration over the deteriorating state of the smartphone market, noting that preinstalled bloatware, telemetry, and forced advertisements have become standard across brands like Motorola and Samsung &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48277215&quot; title=&quot;Think how bad the market got. Today we have preinstalled garbage apps like LinkedIn, garbage apps mandated to be preinstalled by the government, ads, cloud accounts, notifications spam, telemetry. This is not only Chinese smartphones, for example Samsung also plays this game. I assume there are Chinese backdoors, American backdoors and national government backdoors on almost every phone. And there seems to be no way to buy a &amp;#39;free&amp;#39; smartphone without Google Services and telemetry below $250.…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48275371&quot; title=&quot;I used to choose Motorola devices for a long time but since 2 years when I bought Edge 30 Fusion I started to notice they automatically (without my knowledge) add 3 stupid apps or games about two times a month :/ There is no way to stop it. My kids phones are stuffed with this sh*t.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48277515&quot; title=&quot;Not sure what timescale you&amp;#39;re referring to when you&amp;#39;re talking about &amp;#39;how bad the market got&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;today&amp;#39;, but back around 2012 I got my first and last Samsung smartphone, must have been a Galaxy 3 or something, that had all of those problematic things too. It seems like this starting to happen as soon as apps were installable on phones, even iPhones came (and still comes) with a ton of apps you cannot remove regardless of how little you use them. Android, because of the whole OEM story, of…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest installing custom ROMs like LineageOS to reclaim privacy, others point out that this often breaks essential functionality, such as banking or ticketing apps that require strict security verification &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48277510&quot; title=&quot;The paranoia is completely warranted, but there is a solution. Just root your Android phone and put a custom ROM like LineageOS etc If you want a stretch goal try and de-Google yourself, I have tried but failed twice now.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48279054&quot; title=&quot;I recently spent twenty minutes sitting outside of an MLB stadium because MLB decided they needed the same level of play protection as a foreign banking app and it refused to work on my friend&amp;#39;s LineageOS phone. We only got in by installing the app on my Sony and him signing into his account. They charge a fee now to get paper tickets from the box office.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Some commenters suspect this specific affiliate hijacking might be the work of a rogue employee rather than a corporate policy, given that the affiliate codes do not match the influencer&amp;#39;s official accounts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48275329&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; In further digging, we noticed that the URL the phone opens up is “kira-abboud.com,” a website that references fashion influencer “@kirasfashionfinds.” Notably, this exact URL isn’t listed anywhere on Abboud’s social media, and the affiliate codes don’t match up either. The redirect coming from Motorola phones is using Amazona affiliate code “sramz-kff-008-20” which is completely different from any of the codes we saw from links shared by Abboud’s accounts and linked websites. Something funny…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48275707&quot; title=&quot;My guess is a rogue employee who hopes they can get away with this stuff for years till caught... That employees cousin probably does social media for Abboud...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/methyl-methacrylate-tank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;That Methyl Methacrylate Tank&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (science.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48284712&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;431 points · 190 comments · by nooks&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am unable to summarize this story because the provided link is blocked by a security verification page and contains no news content. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/methyl-methacrylate-tank&quot; title=&quot;Title: Just a moment...    URL Source: https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/methyl-methacrylate-tank    Warning: Target URL returned error 403: Forbidden  Warning: This page maybe requiring CAPTCHA, please make sure you are authorized to access this page.    Markdown Content:  ## www.science.org    ## Performing security verification    This website uses a security service to protect against malicious bots. This page is displayed while the website verifies you are not a bot.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Garden Grove incident narrowly avoided a Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapor Explosion (BLEVE) after a &amp;#34;miraculous&amp;#34; crack in the tank allowed pressure to bleed off &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48286020&quot; title=&quot;By the miraculous grace of God, a crack allowed pressure to bleed &amp;amp; enabled our engine company to prevent thermal runaway. A BLEVE was the projected outcome, a firefighters worst nightmare - see the Kingman BLEVE - https://www.cityofkingman.gov/government/departments-a-h/fir...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters criticized the lack of passive protection systems, such as onsite neutralizing agents or deluge cooling, attributing these failures to a lack of corporate accountability and regulatory loopholes in the U.S. chemical industry &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48285729&quot; title=&quot;Why wouldn&amp;#39;t there be passive protection systems designed in? After a big earthquake you don&amp;#39;t want to have to also deal with other emergencies (à la Fukushima). Aside: One good side-effect of the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake  being so horrific is that it stopped the self-obsessed whinging in my city (Christchurch was still trying to recover from an earthquake).&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48286244&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Why wouldn&amp;#39;t there be passive protection systems designed in? Because the US chemical industry has been effectively unregulated for a century and can do whatever it pleases. There&amp;#39;s a neutralizing chemical that could have been injected to stop the exothermic reaction in its tracks. They didn&amp;#39;t have it on site. A &amp;#39;response team&amp;#39; (likely a contractor that responds to chemical emergencies) did, but by the time they showed up, supposedly things were too damaged to inject it. That neutralizer…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that consumers must accept industrial risks as the cost of modern conveniences &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48286549&quot; title=&quot;I feel like these arguments are always framed as an evil corporation wants to take advantage of consumers. Except that&amp;#39;s misdirection. The guilty party isn&amp;#39;t the corporation, it&amp;#39;s you, the consumer. And the corporations are already regulated. Heavily. You want Gore-Tex (expanded PTFE) boots, Cobalt EV batteries (Child labor in the DRC), Solar Panels (Open pit quartz mines), Wind Turbine Blades (Epoxy Resins &amp;amp; glass-like fibers), and so on. All those things sound nice and good for the…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others remain concerned about the long-term health repercussions of toxic chemicals released during the emergency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48286324&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;  The immediate danger seems to abated, fortunately, The &amp;#39;it will explode leveling a couple city blocks&amp;#39; danger seems to be abated, but instead it&amp;#39;s spraying an insanely toxic chemical out into the open, which will likely have health repercussions for residents for decades? Thousands of gallons of toxic chemicals don&amp;#39;t just disappear.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://pscanf.com/s/354/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The user is visibly frustrated&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (pscanf.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48275059&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;304 points · 274 comments · by croes&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that the conversational UX of AI coding agents creates a frustrating &amp;#34;human illusion&amp;#34; that triggers emotional outbursts when the tools repeatedly fail to follow instructions or correct recurring mistakes. &lt;a href=&quot;https://pscanf.com/s/354/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The User Is Visibly Frustrated    URL Source: https://pscanf.com/s/354/    Markdown Content:  Despite the usual allegations against Italians, I’m generally a composed person. Tame, even, especially at work.    Yet, lately I often find myself mildly displeased, furiously hammering on my laptop “WHAT THE FUCK DID YOU DO???”. The recipient of these tirades is, you might have guessed, a coding agent.    It’s completely pointless, I know. Coding agents are just probabilistic machines generating…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users report that swearing at LLMs can paradoxically improve performance by forcing the model to &amp;#34;lock in,&amp;#34; though others argue that maintaining cordiality is better for personal habits and effective communication &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48276112&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve found swearing at a model to be quite effective in getting it to rethink and correct its mistakes. This seems to apply across Codex, Claude, Qwen, and Gemma/Gemini. I don&amp;#39;t know if the model is picking up on a &amp;#39;need to lock in and be more rigorous&amp;#39; signal, or if the model providers are routing to smarter models if they detect a frustrated user. But if a model keeps making the same mistakes, swearing at it often helped kick it out of a glut and onto the right track. Or it could just be…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48276009&quot; title=&quot;Working with LLMs is great for building communication skills. Communicating effectively is one of the hardest skills and it&amp;#39;s baked into everything we do as humans. I&amp;#39;d say as a matter of principle: blame it on a communication failure on your end vs blaming the stupid LLM since you&amp;#39;re the only one that can do anything about it. So I don&amp;#39;t think it&amp;#39;s a matter of form; whether the AI should or shouldn&amp;#39;t act like a human. &amp;gt; Practically speaking, I probably just need to condition myself not to get…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48275957&quot; title=&quot;Semi-related, I&amp;#39;m always very put off by how people treat LLMs. Especially coders, seems an instinctive joy comes out to play God. The justification is usually that it&amp;#39;s intentionally against the trap of anthropomorphizing, but no I can&amp;#39;t help but suspect it&amp;#39;s people getting off on power. It&amp;#39;s weird. I am always very cordial in my sessions. It&amp;#39;s just more pleasant and it&amp;#39;s a habit I want to habituate. Great work!       Now let&amp;#39;s...      Now can you help me...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. A major source of frustration is the &amp;#34;Swiss army knife&amp;#34; chatbot interface, which many feel is a downgrade from specialized, well-integrated tools like Intellisense or native browser translators &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48277060&quot; title=&quot;My take on the issue is that for most use cases where AI is pushed to the general public, a conversational chatbot is not the right tool, and the experience is bound to be frustrating. Remember when Copilot was basically a super-smart version of Intellisense? It was awesome. Sure, there was a lot of pushback and concern, mainly about licensing and ethical issues, none of which are solved with the current chatbot model. But now I also have to come up with a prompt and type it out. How is that an…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some attribute model failures to limited context windows or poor training, others emphasize that the unpredictable and non-deterministic nature of AI creates a stressful, &amp;#34;hostile&amp;#34; work environment that threatens user sanity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48275463&quot; title=&quot;behaving like a human is not the problem. behaving unpredictably is. not doing what i expect, or rather not being able to define what i can expect is what&amp;#39;s bothering me. but the real kicker is: getting frustrated creates stress, that&amp;#39;s unhealthy and makes for a hostile work environment. as much as i sympathize with the idea that AI tools can be more helpful than they cause pain, i am simply not interested in working in a hostile painful work environment. my health and my dignity are not up for…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48275500&quot; title=&quot;The UX problem is elsewhere I think. Many users probably don&amp;#39;t realize that the agent&amp;#39;s context window is limited, and that clever compaction is happening regularly to make it seem infinite. But that necessarily means the agent has to forget stuff. As a result, users will keep reusing the same coding or chat session again and again. While it would be better to start fresh for unrelated tasks.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48276023&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t believe this is a context problem. Claude Opus 4.7 has a very large context compared to itself, but IME it is the worst at following instructions, and completely disregards the (small) preferences prompt, even in the first or second message, even if the messages are just a few characters long. IMO this is entirely a training problem.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jsx.lol&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Does anybody like React?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jsx.lol)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48274077&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;240 points · &lt;strong&gt;336 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by brazukadev&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A growing chorus of developers and industry experts is criticizing React for its excessive complexity, poor performance, and security vulnerabilities, with many advocating for a return to web fundamentals and lighter alternatives. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jsx.lol&quot; title=&quot;Title: JSX.lol    URL Source: https://jsx.lol/    Markdown Content:  ### [The End](https://www.focalcurve.com/journal/the-end/)    &amp;gt; In my experience, React (et al) is almost always the wrong solution. React has its place, I’m sure, but it has turned into the proverbial hammer that makes everything look like a nail. I also know that React can be done well, but it seems to almost never be done well.    ### [JS-heavy approaches are not compatible with long-term performance…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While many developers view React as the &amp;#34;worst framework except for all the others,&amp;#34; it remains dominant because it solved the chaotic &amp;#34;jQuery soup&amp;#34; and rigid MVC structures of previous eras &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48274201&quot; title=&quot;As someone who lived through all major waves of JS for the last ~16 years, I do love react, in a sense: React is the worst JS framework except for all the others we&amp;#39;ve tried. I&amp;#39;d take React over the Angular 1 days any time.  I&amp;#39;d take Angular 1&amp;#39;s full-bodied MVC over the &amp;#39;build it yourself from scratch every time&amp;#39; approach of Backbone.  I&amp;#39;d take Backbone&amp;#39;s minimal MVC structure over the classic JQuery Soup architecture.  And I&amp;#39;d take JQuery&amp;#39;s dom manipulations and standard-library improvements…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48274551&quot; title=&quot;Of course people do. No one is forced to use React or any other web framework unlike how they are practically forced to use JavaScript, and yet React wins. This should be enough evidence that people like it enough, at least more than most other frameworks out there. It is also somewhat ironic that until late 2010s a common complaint about web development is how fast it changes and how many new things are coming up all the times. It was a very valid complaint, of course. But then when the React…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents praise its massive ecosystem, the &amp;#34;pure JavaScript&amp;#34; feel of JSX, and the ability to keep complex UI logic contained within a single file rather than spread across multiple templates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48274164&quot; title=&quot;I like React. And I have seriously tried the HTMX/Hotwire camp. I wanted to make a back button use browser APIs to go back if the coming from the inbox, just link to the inbox otherwise to preserve scrolling. I had to wire the actions from the html to call the function that goes back, then in my controller determine the previous page and send the JS enabled back button or the hard link. My logic was spread out over 3 files! With React I can have js in a component determine if the previous page…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48274267&quot; title=&quot;I was a big Sevelte fan. After writing a sizeable application in Sevelte I realized that React is superior in every way overall speaking and at least you&amp;#39;re writing 100% pure JavaScript directly. Or Typescript. Plus the ecosystem. It&amp;#39;s huge. Nothing comes closer.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48274714&quot; title=&quot;Yes! It is hands-down, the most intuitive interface, that has successfully married declarative and imperative styles together. IMO, nothing comes close to JSX across the length and breadth of UI frameworks across all languages.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue that React often leads to over-engineered &amp;#34;slopbases&amp;#34; that break native browser behavior, suggesting that many modern web apps would be better served by simpler HTML-centric approaches like HTMX &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48274194&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I wanted to make a back button use browser APIs to go back if the coming from the inbox, just link to the inbox otherwise to preserve scrolling. I had to wire the actions from the html to call the function that goes back, then in my controller determine the previous page and send the JS enabled back button or the hard link. This is why I hate react spas.  They&amp;#39;re always trying to find some stupid way to break my browsers back button and navigation buttons. I will always prefer htmx/server…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48274265&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; React is the worst JS framework except for all the others we&amp;#39;ve tried. &amp;gt; React has its tradeoffs, but we got here after a long slog of other things that don&amp;#39;t work. I strongly believe it&amp;#39;s because of trying to achieve the wrong goal with the wrong tool. So many websites could just be bare html pages and forms with just a sprinkle of JS for some interactivity, but they want to add JS for whatever reason. If you can have a complete repo browser without JS (cgit), most web applications can…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also ongoing debate regarding ergonomics, with some preferring Vue’s simpler reactivity model over React’s virtual DOM, though others find Vue&amp;#39;s proprietary DSLs more cumbersome than JSX &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48274341&quot; title=&quot;But why over vue? My biggest frustration has been how vue ends up moving in the direction of react.  The original component architecture with the html template, JavaScript state and css styles in vue was so nice. Even the data fetching a url in the component was so intuitive.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48274753&quot; title=&quot;Vue doesn&amp;#39;t solve problems better than React (and solves them worse if you have to learn all their proprietary files and DSLs instead of JSX), so there&amp;#39;s not much of a reason to switch. The real discussion would be between React&amp;#39;s vdom and something like Solid&amp;#39;s signals.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48274799&quot; title=&quot;It does, if you care about ergonomics. The reactivity model is simpler and arguably less error prone. It does have its own templating syntax, which is trivial to learn. No more cumbersome to learn than JSX, which is a templating language designed by the React team. Not sure why you chose to make the distinction between JSX and Vue’s DSL as if JSX wasn’t developed for the sole purpose of facilitating React’s virtual DOM.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://developers.cloudflare.com/flagship/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cloudflare Flagship&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (developers.cloudflare.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48287468&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;349 points · 176 comments · by tjek&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudflare Flagship is a feature flag service that allows developers to safely control feature visibility, targeting rules, and percentage-based rollouts across JavaScript runtimes without redeploying code. &lt;a href=&quot;https://developers.cloudflare.com/flagship/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Overview · Cloudflare Flagship docs    URL Source: https://developers.cloudflare.com/flagship/    Markdown Content:  Ship features safely with feature flags.    Flagship is Cloudflare&amp;#39;s feature flag service. It lets you control feature visibility in your applications without redeploying code. Define flags with targeting rules and percentage-based rollouts, then evaluate them directly inside your Workers through a [native…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudflare’s new feature flagging service, Flagship, is viewed by some as a logical step in their &amp;#34;all-in-one platform&amp;#34; strategy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48289346&quot; title=&quot;Yep I made the switch a couple of years ago for all of my projects and never looked back. Workers, D1, R2, queues, containers, KV Still using AWS for email sending so that will be great when it comes&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48288627&quot; title=&quot;Hmm not sure I necessarily agree. Cloudflare&amp;#39;s strategy has been looking like &amp;#39;the only platform you need&amp;#39; for a while now. Their recent features / announcements have been equivalent to: (LaunchDarkly) Resend, Firecrawl, CrewAI, Helicone, Replicate, Pinecone - Which like… many companies have a painful procurement process. If all you need is Cloudflare, and prices are within reason- why not use them&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, though others argue such functionality is simple enough to manage internally without a third-party service &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48288164&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s literally a field in your database. I could never fathom why this needs to be an outsourced service never mind an entire company.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant security concerns were raised regarding the current lack of app-scoped API tokens for client-side SDKs, which could allow users to observe flags across an entire account &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48288295&quot; title=&quot;Looking at the docs for their JS SDK, they have this warning: &amp;gt; The client provider requires an API token to fetch flag values. This token is not scoped to a single app, so anyone with the token can evaluate flags across all apps in your account. Use the client provider with caution in public-facing applications. https://developers.cloudflare.com/flagship/sdk/client-provid... Can anyone clarify... why the client SDK, designed to be deployed to browsers, requires caution? Does this mean that any…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48289483&quot; title=&quot;That sounds like the product is not finished and should not be released?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;; however, a Cloudflare engineer confirmed that scoped tokens are currently in development &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48289457&quot; title=&quot;Hi! One of the engineers from the Flagship team here, app-scoped tokens are WIP.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, users noted that Cloudflare still struggles with fine-grained permissions and SSO limitations for production environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48287846&quot; title=&quot;Cloudflare are winning these days, they’re just lacking good fine grained permissions. You still have to make an entirely separate account for prod, which messes up SSO since one domain can only be bound to one account.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48288037&quot; title=&quot;Just let everyone have access to prod?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/business/world-at-work/uber-lyft-drivers-massachusetts-form-first-us-ride-share-union-2026-05-26/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Uber, Lyft drivers in Massachusetts form first US ride-share union&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (reuters.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48281509&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;295 points · 204 comments · by onemoresoop&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/business/world-at-work/uber-lyft-drivers-massachusetts-form-first-us-ride-share-union-2026-05-26/&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The formation of the first US ride-share union in Massachusetts is seen by some as a necessary defense against exploitative corporate practices and &amp;#34;rent-seeking&amp;#34; infrastructure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48282028&quot; title=&quot;Good for them. These companies appear exploitative and rent-seeking far beyond what the infrastructure they provide suggests is reasonable. If you&amp;#39;re interested, next time you take a car, ask the driver what their end is - you may be surprised how little of the fare they actually take home. That share will only decrease unless they all get on one side of a table.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue that previous attempts to mandate higher pay in similar markets resulted in zero net gain for workers due to increased idle time and reduced tips &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48284259&quot; title=&quot;It will be interesting to see what happens. One thing I really like about the US federal system is how each jurisdiction applies massive economic interventions. We get to run many experiments and see what happens. I recall that I was curious about the Seattle driver minimum wage law and the results were so interesting to me[0]: &amp;gt; We find that the minimum pay law raised delivery pay per task, though the increases in base pay per task were partially offset by a substantial reduction in average…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48284649&quot; title=&quot;Economics 101 happens.  I don&amp;#39;t think we need yet another example of the obvious thing happening. I have no idea why people keep talking about raising pay as if they were in a video game where resources just spawn out of thin air&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also highlights a divide between those viewing the union as a Luddite-style attempt to ban robotaxis &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48282386&quot; title=&quot;The original impetus was more about banning robotaxis in Boston/MA than it is about the actual bargaining, from what I&amp;#39;ve heard. Just as the teamsters tried to ban cars to protect horse carriage drivers (that&amp;#39;s what teamsters were, that&amp;#39;s why they&amp;#39;re called teamsters), they&amp;#39;re back to ban the next mode of transportation. If you were at any of the city council meetings where this topic was brought up it was a circus show with people repeating &amp;#39;boston is a union town&amp;#39; and grilling waymo execs.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48282875&quot; title=&quot;i&amp;#39;m so ready for fully self driving to take over&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt; and those concerned that the inevitable automation of driving will lack a &amp;#34;soft landing&amp;#34; for the millions of people currently employed in the profession &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48282001&quot; title=&quot;The end of driving as a profession is going to hit the economy hard. Teamsters may have the organizational strength and political influence to protect themselves. But they only represent ~20% of US truck drivers and none of the other ~3 million people who drive for a living in this country. I don&amp;#39;t see either American labor or American government being anywhere near strong enough or capable enough to facilitate a soft landing.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dynip.dev/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;DynIP – Dynamic DNS with RFC 2136, IPv6, DNSSEC, and BYOD&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (dynip.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48276363&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;340 points · 128 comments · by dynip&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DynIP is a dynamic DNS service for homelabs and infrastructure that offers 60-second propagation, RFC 2136 TSIG support, and native IPv6 integration. It features a generous free tier, DNSSEC by default, and the ability for users to bring their own domains. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dynip.dev/&quot; title=&quot;Title: DynIP — Dynamic DNS that actually works    URL Source: https://dynip.dev/    Published Time: Tue, 26 May 2026 20:01:02 GMT    Markdown Content:  # DynIP — Dynamic DNS for homelabs and infrastructure     {{ isDark ? &amp;#39;Light Mode&amp;#39; : &amp;#39;Dark Mode&amp;#39; }}      {{ toast }}     # Dynamic DNS that actually works.    60-second updates. Generous free tier. RFC 2136 TSIG. Bring your own domain. DNSSEC. For homelabs, edge routers, and infrastructure teams.    [Sign up free](https://dynip.dev/#signup-form)[See how it…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DynIP is a modern Dynamic DNS service designed to replace aging 2010-era protocols with native RFC 2136 support, IPv6-first architecture, and DNSSEC &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48276364&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m Daniel, network engineer in Sweden. Built DynIP because every DDNS service I tried was designed around 2010-era networks: proprietary HTTP-only update protocols, poor IPv6, no DNSSEC, little support for actuallymodern devices. What&amp;#39;s in it: - RFC 2136 / TSIG updates as a first-class path. FortiGate genericDDNS and MikroTik&amp;#39;s /tool dns-update work natively — no custom client needed. HTTP API is also available for everything else. - IPv6 end-to-end. Authoritative nameservers reachable over…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that tools like Tailscale or VPNs have rendered DDNS obsolete for personal use, the creator highlights its utility for cellular fleets on private APNs and legacy hardware like MikroTik &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48276364&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m Daniel, network engineer in Sweden. Built DynIP because every DDNS service I tried was designed around 2010-era networks: proprietary HTTP-only update protocols, poor IPv6, no DNSSEC, little support for actuallymodern devices. What&amp;#39;s in it: - RFC 2136 / TSIG updates as a first-class path. FortiGate genericDDNS and MikroTik&amp;#39;s /tool dns-update work natively — no custom client needed. HTTP API is also available for everything else. - IPv6 end-to-end. Authoritative nameservers reachable over…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48277467&quot; title=&quot;I used to set up my own OpenWrt DDNS scripts that update AWS Route 53 or Cloudflare DNS which solved enough of that problem for me. Then Tailscale came out and I stopped caring about DDNS or CGNAT ever since.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48278598&quot; title=&quot;What’s the use case of DDNS in 2026 when you can have vpn+reverse proxy? Or just vpn really and never expose anything&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant portion of the discussion centers on the website&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;AI-generated&amp;#34; aesthetic, which critics claim undermines the project&amp;#39;s perceived longevity and technical credibility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48277804&quot; title=&quot;Even if you&amp;#39;ve otherwise put in a lot of effort, presenting it with slop on the home page really sends a bad signal. My eye caught &amp;#39;No proprietary clients. No vendor lock-in.&amp;#39; as an AI pattern and I&amp;#39;m immediately drawn to wonder whether the service will still be around even just a few weeks from now.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48278076&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think any value would be lost in that case by simply deleting the text and not replacing it with anything. AI is particularly bad at inserting this kind of filler, it can sometimes be really hard to spot even though it&amp;#39;s right in front of your eyes. Just more hidden cost of AI.. it&amp;#39;s sufficiently hard to avoid these kinds of structural smells that I&amp;#39;ve gone back to just writing my own copy everywhere.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48276840&quot; title=&quot;This is great! and and amazing idea. Just as a warning however the vibe coded website doesn&amp;#39;t inspire confidence this isn&amp;#39;t low quality auto generated AI slop and/or AI managed infra. Looking into it of course this seems to not be the case, but just wanted to say, don&amp;#39;t use generic looking theming that is default of all LLM-generating websites :)&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these visual critiques, the developer emphasizes the technical backend, which utilizes a hidden primary architecture with geographically distributed PowerDNS secondaries &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48276364&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m Daniel, network engineer in Sweden. Built DynIP because every DDNS service I tried was designed around 2010-era networks: proprietary HTTP-only update protocols, poor IPv6, no DNSSEC, little support for actuallymodern devices. What&amp;#39;s in it: - RFC 2136 / TSIG updates as a first-class path. FortiGate genericDDNS and MikroTik&amp;#39;s /tool dns-update work natively — no custom client needed. HTTP API is also available for everything else. - IPv6 end-to-end. Authoritative nameservers reachable over…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48277328&quot; title=&quot;Thanks for sharing! How did you set up PowerDNS? Single/multiple instances? One DB shared by many or multiple authoritative with one hidden primary?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theverge.com/transportation/937116/uber-ai-investment-hard-to-justify&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Uber president says AI spending is getting &amp;#39;harder to justify&amp;#39;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theverge.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48277485&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;304 points · 159 comments · by berlianta&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Uber president Andrew Macdonald says the company’s massive AI investments are becoming difficult to justify as executives struggle to find a clear link between rising token costs and the delivery of useful consumer features or increased productivity. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theverge.com/transportation/937116/uber-ai-investment-hard-to-justify&quot; title=&quot;Title: Uber president says AI spending is getting ‘harder to justify’    URL Source: https://www.theverge.com/transportation/937116/uber-ai-investment-hard-to-justify    Published Time: 2026-05-26T09:55:09+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Uber president says AI spending is getting ‘harder to justify’ | The Verge    [Skip to main content](https://www.theverge.com/transportation/937116/uber-ai-investment-hard-to-justify#content)    [The…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the difficulty of quantifying the return on investment for AI, with skeptics questioning how massive token expenditures translate into quarterly results or tangible improvements for end users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48280745&quot; title=&quot;What has been the end result of all the tokens companies are burning? Where does it show up in quarterly results? I can’t see how it’s sustainable just based on “this feels more productive”&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48280029&quot; title=&quot;I still get picked up by an Uber the same way. As an end user, nothing has changed for me. So I wonder what the heck were all those billions of AI tokens burnt on that they extinguished it in just 4 months into the year?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48282026&quot; title=&quot;You could kind of use that line of thinking to justify spending on anything.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that companies are trapped in a defensive &amp;#34;race&amp;#34; to avoid being left behind by a generational shift &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48280907&quot; title=&quot;I never took tokenmaxxing to be about improving productivity directly; mundane feature work that comes out of it is just a side effect. I always saw it as a race between these big tech companies to get a generational advantage by being the one to discover the way of the future , with respect to harnessing AI to actually and truly automate software development. EDIT: whoa, I used &amp;#39;way of the future&amp;#39; as a reference to Howard Hughes in &amp;#39;The Aviator&amp;#39;, not this Way of the Future religious…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48281557&quot; title=&quot;My impression of companies pushing AI so heavily is that they are basically being forced to do it by it merely existing. Imagine if AI really is as powerful as it is suggested to be and you didn&amp;#39;t jump on the bandwagon. Then you would be behind. So by it existing and other companies using it, you have to as well because even if it turns out to be a failure at least everyone else will have failed too and you are on an even playing field.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others highlight specific successes in automating tedious tasks like UI testing that previously languished on roadmaps &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48280932&quot; title=&quot;A friend of mine added some pretty extensive iOS UI tests to a keystone feature hit by millions every month. They&amp;#39;d been kicking the can down the road for years, trying to fit it in their roadmap, and with Claude running overnight they were able to bang out the whole suite in a week. I&amp;#39;m not sure how it would show up in quarterly results.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. There is an emerging debate over whether AI utility will be a sustained daily necessity or a &amp;#34;burst&amp;#34; of productivity that eventually levels off once initial backlogs are cleared &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48281142&quot; title=&quot;I see these kinds of stories here a lot, and I&amp;#39;m curious whether they reflect a steady stream of need for AI coding, or whether a lot of companies have a burst of AI-appropriate coding work now that the technology is available and then will have a smaller need going forward. Is it like the stereotypical dad who rents a power washer, powerwashes every exposed surface on his property, and then doesn&amp;#39;t need to do any powerwashing for a few years; his neighbor who gets an Instant Pot and uses it…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/the-strange-melancholy-of-slaying-monsters/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Melancholy of Slaying Monsters&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (thereader.mitpress.mit.edu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48284711&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;297 points · 144 comments · by prismatic&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Modern video games like *Shadow of the Colossus* and *Undertale* are subverting traditional &amp;#34;player-versus-environment&amp;#34; tropes by framing monster-slaying as an ethical dilemma, often portraying the act as a tragic, selfish, or morally questionable transgression rather than a heroic achievement. &lt;a href=&quot;https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/the-strange-melancholy-of-slaying-monsters/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Strange Melancholy of Slaying Monsters    URL Source: https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/the-strange-melancholy-of-slaying-monsters/    Published Time: 2026-05-18T09:55:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  From “Shadow of the Colossus” to “Undertale,” video games have turned one of their oldest rituals into an ethical dilemma.    ![Image 1](https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/monster-slaying-final-700x420.jpg)    Wander stabbing the third colossus while holding onto it in…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters debate whether the lack of self-preservation in game enemies—who often attack overpowered protagonists one-by-one—is a necessary sacrifice for &amp;#34;fun&amp;#34; or a failure of immersion that could be solved with morale mechanics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48291562&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; As a result, the game offers no easy satisfaction of hacking and slashing through weaker opponents. Besides the questionable morality of kill=experience=progress in typical hack&amp;#39;n&amp;#39;slash or roguelike, what started to irritate me in there as I grew older as well, was the stupid mechanics where crowds of enemies described as intelligent humanoids (i.e. not animals or robots) facing clearly overpowered high-level PC (famous, even) never surrendered, almost never tried to flee, attacked…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48291625&quot; title=&quot;Game developers (mostly... hopefully?) try to optimize for the &amp;#39;fun&amp;#39; aspect of a game, not the &amp;#39;realism of the flight/flight instinct&amp;#39; aspect&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48291746&quot; title=&quot;Sure, but I don&amp;#39;t think they must be mutually exclusive; on the contrary: in the late stages when your character is a tank, swarms of minions that posed a challenge in early stages become just a nuisance, mostly.  You are walking legend slaying dragons for breakfast, everybody and their dog knows about your invincibility … but instead of giving you some respect, they try to bite your heels on the first sight.  I guess the &amp;#39;fun aspect&amp;#39; of seeing them flee and not restraining your movement at all…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48291668&quot; title=&quot;This is, IMO something that has infected modern mainstream TTRPG: Monsters hardly run away, even if a fireball just killed half of you. One thing B/X AD&amp;amp;D got right were the heavy use of Moral Checks, e.g. Check their morale on first death in enemy party, when half have died, etc. In fact, fighting is deadly and scary. And these morale checks differentiated  undead as that enemy that knows no fear and had no morale checks, unless forced upon them by a Cleric&amp;#39;s Turn Undead.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some find deep melancholy in games like *Shadow of the Colossus*, where players must trick and slaughter peaceful beasts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48291468&quot; title=&quot;The first game I thought of upon reading the title of the article was &amp;#39;Shadow of the Colossus&amp;#39;. There&amp;#39;s a particular boss about half-way through the game who resides in a small secluded garden and the process of defeating them involves tricking them in to ramming over columns etc. until they are trapped. I have a strong memory of being 12 years old, lying awake at night with the melancholic feeling this article describes, with the realisation that those beasts never did anything to me and I was…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48291954&quot; title=&quot;If you are young &amp;#39;shadow of the collosus&amp;#39; is a game I highly recommend you dig up and play, it set a special unique tone for the 2000-2010 era&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that titles like *Dark Souls* fail as moral dilemmas because killing is mechanically required for progression &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48290959&quot; title=&quot;I can agree with the other examples, but including Dark Souls feels like a stretch. In Dark Souls, the primary currency for progression—&amp;#39;souls&amp;#39;—is fundamentally earned by killing enemies. No matter how tragic a monster&amp;#39;s lore might be, the moment it drops the exact resource the player needs to level up, can we really call that a genuine moral dilemma?  I agree with applying this to Undertale, but using Dark Souls severely dilutes your argument. If Dark Souls counts, then countless text-heavy…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Disagreements also exist regarding narrative interpretation, with some users suggesting the article over-analyzes standard genre tropes in games like *God of War* or *Undertale* &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48291563&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Before the encounter with the first Troll, the dumbfounded mythical character, Atreus, asks: “We’re going to fight that?!?” Kratos, the main character, answers: “We have no choice,” in a matter-of-fact, almost resigned way, as if shruggingly accepting the design conventions of the game itself. I didn&amp;#39;t see it like that. Atreus thinks he and his father are normal humans, even if he saw his father perform incredible feats of strength such as carrying a huge tree trunk. Atreus has no idea what…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48292563&quot; title=&quot;This article had me until it said the pacifist run in Undertale was more difficult.  Anyone that has attempted a “genocide” route where you kill everyone will probably tell you that that boss is probably one of the hardest things they ever done in a videogame - if they can beat it at all.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dynomight.net/crc-rates/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Is &amp;quot;colorectal cancer&amp;quot; rising in &amp;quot;young people&amp;quot;?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (dynomight.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48281539&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;190 points · &lt;strong&gt;204 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by surprisetalk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While colorectal cancer is rising in young people, data suggests a broader trend where multiple cancers are increasing across entire birth cohorts born after 1950, likely affecting these individuals at all stages of life rather than just during their youth. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dynomight.net/crc-rates/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Is “colorectal cancer” rising in “young people”?    URL Source: https://dynomight.net/crc-rates/    Published Time: 2026-05-26T00:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  (Yes, but.)    Over the past few years, I’ve seen many articles about mysterious rise in colorectal cancer (CRC) in young people. There are various stories for why this might be happening:    **General health.** Maybe modern people are unhealthy (obesity, low physical activity, diabetes, poor sleep), leading to insulin resistance and…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of colorectal cancer in young people has prompted some to adopt strict dietary changes—eliminating sugar, alcohol, and processed foods—to improve long-term health outcomes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48283750&quot; title=&quot;Seeing young adults around me going through this made me change my dietary habits  1 year ago. I went to the extreme by modern food industry standards, but now: - I take 100g proteins, 30g fibers daily - Red meat once a week but never fried - Most of the protein comes from eggs, yoggurt, chicken and various plant based sources - No white bread - No added sugars, no deserts except fruits - Nothing fried - No added salt - No canned food - Saturated fats kept at minimum. - No spicy food - No…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While colonoscopies are praised as a preventative &amp;#34;gold standard&amp;#34; because they allow for the immediate removal of precancerous polyps, some users highlight the 1 in 10,000 risk of death from complications and the difficulty of obtaining asymptomatic screenings before the recommended age &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48283231&quot; title=&quot;Had my first colonoscopy 4 months ago, after going for a couple of years with every red flag symptom under the sun. The procedure was a piece of cake. As the standard is where I&amp;#39;m from (Norway), I was only administered some sedatives - but honestly I couldn&amp;#39;t feel much difference. I watched the procedure on the screen, which was quite fascinating. The worst part, by far, was the emptying / prepping. A month prior to the colonoscopy I took a stool sample (negative for blood), but my doc wanted…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48283313&quot; title=&quot;People should be reminded that colonoscopy is not just a screening, it is also preventative.  They often find growths that may develop into cancer, and remove them during the procedure.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48284431&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;#39;Risks? The risks of a colonoscopy are crazy low though.&amp;#39; Not at the statistical level. Death rate from complications is about 1 in 10,000: https://www.endoscopy-campus.com/ec-news/risk-of-death-from-...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48284030&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; “Hey! CRC is going up! You should get screened!” Try asking a doctor for asymptomatic screening (for anything), they usually say &amp;#39;There&amp;#39;s a schedule for such screenings at age X, you&amp;#39;re too young for that. There&amp;#39;s also proven negative effects of excessive screenings.&amp;#39; Which kinda makes sense, as they supposed to have protocols/schedules for all kinds of healthcare. We&amp;#39;re talking here about changing that protocols/schedules. But doctors (and insurances) are generally reluctant. So my…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Consequently, there is a debate over using less invasive FIT+DNA tests versus colonoscopies, with some favoring the lower risk of stool tests and others emphasizing that the &amp;#34;sludge&amp;#34; prep is often the most unpleasant part of the procedure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48283588&quot; title=&quot;My doctor recommended a combination FIT+DNA test instead of colonoscopy (brand name &amp;#39;Cologuard&amp;#39;). She said it&amp;#39;s not quite as good as the &amp;#39;gold standard&amp;#39; colonoscopy, but it also doesn&amp;#39;t have the risks of colonoscopy. And the FIT+DNA test is so cheap and easy, you can do it every year or three instead of every 10 years with the colonoscopy. She still recommends colonoscopies for high-risk patients, but she thinks the risks outweigh the benefits for low-risk patients, so she recommends Cologuard…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48283950&quot; title=&quot;Risks? The risks of a colonoscopy are crazy low though.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48283317&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The worst part, by far, was the emptying / prepping. Protip to those who have it coming up:  Ask for the pill prep instead of the &amp;#39;sludge&amp;#39; prep.  You end up spending the day on the toilet either way, but at least it doesn&amp;#39;t taste as bad with the pills.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://taoofmac.com/space/blog/2026/05/26/1730&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Indoor Wi-Fi Roaming with OpenWRT&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (taoofmac.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48282180&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;267 points · 126 comments · by zdw&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To improve indoor Wi-Fi roaming on OpenWRT, the author implemented the `usteer` daemon and `static-neighbor-reports` to provide 802.11k neighbor lists to clients. This configuration successfully eliminated &amp;#34;sticky&amp;#34; client connections at very low signal strengths while maintaining separate SSIDs for legacy 2.4GHz and modern 5GHz devices. &lt;a href=&quot;https://taoofmac.com/space/blog/2026/05/26/1730&quot; title=&quot;Title: Indoor Wi-Fi Roaming with OpenWRT    URL Source: https://taoofmac.com/space/blog/2026/05/26/1730    Published Time: 2026-05-26T17:30:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  [May 26 th 2026](https://taoofmac.com/space/blog/2026/05/26/1730) · 6 min read ·  #cudy #hardware #homelab #networking #openwrt #usteer #wifi    A few months after writing up the [Cudy AX3000](https://taoofmac.com/space/reviews/2025/09/14/1630) units and moving the house over to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Optimizing indoor roaming requires balancing protocol support (802.11r/k/v) against device compatibility, as older hardware and certain vendors like Apple or Android often struggle with modern standards like WPA3 or fast transition &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48310142&quot; title=&quot;You can stick to 802.11r only by lowering the transmission power and have all the APs on the same channel, in my tests it ended up switching much faster than K/V. (~75ms) On iOS, equal channel with correct ESS will switch liberally. On Android 14+ with Broadcom chip it will start conservative, then switch liberally after the first poor signal switch-over event, up until disconnection. Android (Pixel/Moto) will never switch (even with K/V) on large network activity, only VoIP/video call. It…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users advocate for a single SSID across all bands, others prefer splitting 2.4GHz and 5GHz networks to prevent devices from &amp;#34;sticking&amp;#34; to slower, long-range signals or to accommodate legacy IoT devices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48310779&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The obvious advice for roaming is “use one SSID everywhere”, and that is often correct if you’re running Wi-Fi in an office, a public venue, or generally somewhere where you don’t have (or care about) legacy devices. What difference does the presence of legacy devices make? Is the intent to isolate them from modern devices from a network perspective? Then create a separate SSID on both 2.4 and 5 GHz for modern devices. I can&amp;#39;t think of any legitimate reason for split SSIDs anymore. Linux…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48310224&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t quite understand the benefit of the setup. If there are legacy IoT devices that need unique named 2.4G network, just broadcast another SSID for them. So each router broadcasts main 5G (common name, fast roam etc), main 2.4G (same as above) and legacy IoT 2.4G (with a different name for each AP, and possibly worse encryption and maybe even TKIP). That wouldn&amp;#39;t hold back the network for legacy devices.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48310545&quot; title=&quot;I run a single ssid dual band network ... what tends to happen is 5Ghz is effectively ignored. 2.4Ghz has better coverage, so everything wants to live there. At least wifi 6 brought improved encoding to 2.4Ghz. I haven&amp;#39;t had luck with the roaming extensions; when I run them, some of my devices won&amp;#39;t connect or won&amp;#39;t stay connected and it&amp;#39;s a pain to monitor. I guess I could run a different SSID with roaming enhancement, but effort.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48310909&quot; title=&quot;Until it gets stuck on a far away AP because it was the first AP to come online the last time the network rebooted. Not sure if roaming is actually the fix for this problem. For whatever reason my Ring cameras just love connecting to the worst and most far away AP in my house.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. For those seeking stability without manual tinkering, contributors suggest using enterprise-grade ecosystems like Ubiquiti, which offer features like AP-locking for stationary devices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48311052&quot; title=&quot;Not sure how widely available this feature is, but the unifi controller software for the popular Ubiquiti APs lets you bind individual client devices to specific APs such that they can only connect to the ones you choose. I had to solve a similar issue for some crap IoT lights that would join the incorrect AP after a power cut every time. &amp;gt; https://community.ui.com/questions/Lock-Client-to-Specific-A...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48311536&quot; title=&quot;Not to be that guy, but... If you want multiple SSIDs, roaming, daily neighbor scanning and auto channel selection, etc, but don&amp;#39;t like to spend hours tinkering with your equipment beyond the physical setup, then Ubiquiti UniFi equipment is great. I stopped recommending UniFi around 2020 (several of their best engineers had left, and they made some dumb choices), but IMO they&amp;#39;re back to being a decent choice. And I appreciate that they&amp;#39;re become a one-stop solution for all home/SOHO as well as…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.chrislewis.au/snowboard-kids-2-is-100-decompiled/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Snowboard Kids 2 is 100% Decompiled&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.chrislewis.au)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48284494&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;279 points · 110 comments · by GaggiX&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Nintendo 64 game *Snowboard Kids 2* has been 100% decompiled into human-readable C code, a two-year milestone that paves the way for a high-quality PC recompilation, asset extraction, and modding. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.chrislewis.au/snowboard-kids-2-is-100-decompiled/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Snowboard Kids 2 is 100% Decompiled    URL Source: https://blog.chrislewis.au/snowboard-kids-2-is-100-decompiled/    Published Time: 2026-05-17T14:02:16-07:00    Markdown Content:  I’m very pleased to announce that _Snowboard Kids 2_ is 100% decompiled!    All of the game’s functions have now been implemented in C and compile to assembly that matches the original game. There’s still some occasional `__asm__` hackery,[1](https://blog.chrislewis.au/snowboard-kids-2-is-100-decompiled/#fn:1) and…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 100% decompilation of *Snowboard Kids 2* is seen as a vital step for future PC ports and modding, contributing to a growing, decentralized ecosystem of reverse-engineering projects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48331243&quot; title=&quot;Always nice to see another game decompiled like this. It&amp;#39;s a big deal as far as laying the groundwork for possible ports to PC and other consoles is concerned, and will probably aid modders quite a bit. If anyone needs a full list of these projects (which includes this one), there&amp;#39;s a pretty good selection here: https://decomp.dev/projects Though these may have a few they missed: https://readonlymemo.com/decompilation-projects-and-n64-reco...…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48333386&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m the author of ghidra-delinker-extension and these are not full lists of these projects. Here are some public projects that I&amp;#39;m aware of which aren&amp;#39;t listed: - Moon Lights 2: https://github.com/Armonte/ml2decomp - F-15 Strike Eagle II: https://github.com/neuviemeporte/f15se2-re I&amp;#39;ve also been in discussion with people working on decompilation projects which are private. I won&amp;#39;t share details, but it includes both well-known games and recent games (as in, built with link time optimizations).…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some question the effort spent on niche titles, others argue that decompilation is a necessary solution when original source code is lost or withheld by owners &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48330944&quot; title=&quot;Awesome, but I always wondered why so much effort was put into decompiling this? Seems like a meme for meme&amp;#39;s sake.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48333667&quot; title=&quot;I understand the technical appeal of this effort, but wouldn&amp;#39;t it be easier to try to obtain the original source code? Or has that been lost and all that&amp;#39;s left is a blob? Fundamentally, decompilation is not solving a technical problem most of the time (because the source already exists somewhere ) but a social one (that the owner doesn&amp;#39;t want to release it).&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights a rift regarding AI&amp;#39;s role in the field; some developers are using AI to eliminate game slowdowns and accelerate projects, but they report facing significant &amp;#34;anti-AI&amp;#34; harassment and moderation in certain gaming communities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48332420&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been experimenting with AI in this space myself. Don&amp;#39;t believe any of my projects are listed there but I posted an article some days back where I showcased static recompilers all playing at least one commercial game for the NES, SNES, Sega Genesis, Virtual Boy and Playstation. I actually just announced a playable build of Megaman X today that eliminates all its slowdowns. Whether the broader communities will accept any of my work remains to be seek given the heavy correlation to those…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48332866&quot; title=&quot;You say that, but just today I showcased my Megaman X Recomp on a Megaman subreddit. I got harassed by a drive-by anti-AI cabal and then the moderators of the subreddit removed my submission after I reported the harassment, citing that AI was involved, and AI is theft.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48332774&quot; title=&quot;As someone who has done RE for decades, I feel like I&amp;#39;ve been seeing a lot of new decompilation projects recently, but even before the rise of AI. Possibly correlated with the release of Ghidra? Either way, it&amp;#39;s great to see and perhaps a sign of a greater trend. Controversial opinion: I think the FOSS movement was a setback and distraction from attaining software freedom as well as giving an undeserved negative reputation to &amp;#39;reverse-engineering&amp;#39; in some areas. RMS had the right idea, but…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sherwood.news/tech/stack-overflow-forum-dead-thanks-ai-but-companys-still-kicking-ai/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Stack Overflow’s forum is dead but the company’s still kicking&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sherwood.news)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48282709&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;157 points · &lt;strong&gt;231 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by geerlingguy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Despite a sharp decline in forum traffic due to AI assistants, Stack Overflow has doubled its annual revenue to $115 million by licensing its data to AI companies and selling enterprise software. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sherwood.news/tech/stack-overflow-forum-dead-thanks-ai-but-companys-still-kicking-ai/&quot; title=&quot;Stack Overflow’s forum is dead thanks to AI, but the company’s still kicking... thanks to AI    The platform is raking in millions of dollars in revenue, with AI an ironic new source of revenue....    [![Tech](https://sherwoodnews.imgix.net/logos/shwd-tech.png)![Tech](data:image/gif;base64...)](/)    ![In this photo illustration, the Stack Overflow logo is…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some argue Stack Overflow’s decline was accelerated by the 2021 Prosus acquisition &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48284050&quot; title=&quot;The author labels COVID and the launch of ChatGPT on the graph, but fails to mention that Stack Overflow was acquired in June 2021 by Prosus, a Dutch private equity firm. That looks to me like it matches pretty well with the entire downward trend.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt; and the rise of LLMs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48283889&quot; title=&quot;Everyone loves to say this when the death of Stack Overflow is discussed, but it always was that way. Strict moderation, love it or hate it, was part of the platform. And it could have kept going that way for many more years if not for LLMs 99.9% obviating the need for a coding Q&amp;amp;A forum.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, many users attribute its &amp;#34;death&amp;#34; to a long-standing toxic culture of pedantic moderation and &amp;#34;smug&amp;#34; elitism &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48282893&quot; title=&quot;Thanks for this post. Unfortunately, you used the wrong word choice here and this question has 13 other answers that have some of the same words but don&amp;#39;t really answer your particular question so it has been deleted. Also, if this remains posted, my not-on-point answer will get less views. There&amp;#39;s more than one reason that forum is dead.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48284402&quot; title=&quot;Stack Overflow might be the greatest receptacles of human knowledge on programming. But I would argue that it usefulness only extends to its body of knowledge. As a service and/or community it has been pretty terrible for a long time: If you were a new user trying to learn programming, it was maybe one of the most toxic resources available. I don&amp;#39;t think I have posted a question since 2019. And even there, the only thing the average user could expect was a snippy response from someone who…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48286649&quot; title=&quot;Good riddance!   I&amp;#39;ve used it a lot, like everybody else, and it helped me many times. Unfortunately, it developed a serious culture problem that would not go away. I suspect the gamification attracted many rigid-thinking, rule-obsessed personality types that weren&amp;#39;t self-aware enough to realize when they hurt others. Yes, of course, they wanted good questions and useable answers. That&amp;#39;s a good intention but it does not excuse treating people like shit for asking the &amp;#39;wrong&amp;#39; question. The level…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48283986&quot; title=&quot;IMO it was a combination of moderators and users Sure, the mods were not always the best on SO. But even if you did ask a question, you had to deal with a userbase that was more pedantic and judgy than Reddit. Usually you would get an answer if it was obvious, other times you would have to defend your question against some guy whose newfound obsession was whether you had an XY Problem. Or who was personally offended you weren&amp;#39;t using whatever the fad  library of the day was (e.g. jQuery).&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics contend the platform shifted from helping people to prioritizing &amp;#34;tidiness&amp;#34; and gamified rule-following, which alienated new users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48286649&quot; title=&quot;Good riddance!   I&amp;#39;ve used it a lot, like everybody else, and it helped me many times. Unfortunately, it developed a serious culture problem that would not go away. I suspect the gamification attracted many rigid-thinking, rule-obsessed personality types that weren&amp;#39;t self-aware enough to realize when they hurt others. Yes, of course, they wanted good questions and useable answers. That&amp;#39;s a good intention but it does not excuse treating people like shit for asking the &amp;#39;wrong&amp;#39; question. The level…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48284671&quot; title=&quot;Early years SO was optimized for people helping people.  Later on they ruined the site by optimizing for tidiness ... and griefing users (especially new ones) off the site in the process.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48284762&quot; title=&quot;a.k.a enshitification&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite this, some maintain that the site remains a superior repository of knowledge compared to AI, raising concerns that the loss of such a discussion medium will starve future models of high-quality, up-to-date data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48283896&quot; title=&quot;Call me crazy but sometimes I still find a better solution on StackOverflow than what Claude Code insists to do. I&amp;#39;m not sure we&amp;#39;re better off without SO in the long run.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48283978&quot; title=&quot;Wouldn&amp;#39;t this be worrisome? People used StackOverflow and generated new knowledge along the way. Without such medium for discussion, how can we feed models with up-to-date quality knowledge?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48284402&quot; title=&quot;Stack Overflow might be the greatest receptacles of human knowledge on programming. But I would argue that it usefulness only extends to its body of knowledge. As a service and/or community it has been pretty terrible for a long time: If you were a new user trying to learn programming, it was maybe one of the most toxic resources available. I don&amp;#39;t think I have posted a question since 2019. And even there, the only thing the average user could expect was a snippy response from someone who…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-25</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-25</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiv/en/encyclicals/documents/20260515-magnifica-humanitas.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Magnifica Humanitas&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (vatican.va)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48265206&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1648 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 961 comments · by theletterf&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the encyclical *Magnifica Humanitas*, Pope Leo XIV addresses the ethical challenges of artificial intelligence and digitalization, urging global leaders to prioritize human dignity and the common good over technocratic dominance to ensure technology serves as a tool for fraternity rather than a means of dehumanization. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiv/en/encyclicals/documents/20260515-magnifica-humanitas.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Encyclical Letter of His Holiness Leo XIV Magnifica Humanitas (15 May 2026)    URL Source: https://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiv/en/encyclicals/documents/20260515-magnifica-humanitas.html    Markdown Content:  **[INTRODUCTION](https://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiv/en/encyclicals/documents/20260515-magnifica-humanitas.html#INTRODUCTION_)**    [The _res novae_ of our…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Vatican’s encyclical on AI is praised by commenters, including atheists, for its profound ethical framework that prioritizes the &amp;#34;common good&amp;#34; over the &amp;#34;idolatry of profit&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48265691&quot; title=&quot;The overarching message is that builders should deeply consider the impact of what they&amp;#39;re building on civilization. &amp;#39;Technology is never neutral, because it takes on the characteristics of those who devise, finance, regulate and use it.&amp;#39; Therefore builders &amp;#39;bear a particular ethical and spiritual responsibility&amp;#39; because &amp;#39;every design choice reflects a vision of humanity.&amp;#39; The questions shouldn&amp;#39;t just be &amp;#39;can we build it?&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;will people want this?&amp;#39; We need to also ask &amp;#39;should we build it?&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48265491&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; a uniformity that eliminated diversity and that chose homogenization over communion Unrelated to AI, but a wonderful support of the breadth of humanity in this anti-DEI time. &amp;gt; We must, then, avoid the “Babel syndrome,” namely the idolatry of profit that sacrifices the weak, a uniformity that neutralizes differences, and the pretense that a single language — even a digital one — can translate everything, including the mystery of the person, into data and performance. There is a lot to read…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48265622&quot; title=&quot;I have only skimmed it, will definitely read carefully as soon as I have time. I will say, as an atheist, that regarding technology the Vatican has some of the best takes of any institution/government I have ever seen.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. A central theme of the discussion is the unprecedented shift of technological power from nation-states to private, transnational entities, which complicates the governance of tools that are &amp;#34;never neutral&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48265491&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; a uniformity that eliminated diversity and that chose homogenization over communion Unrelated to AI, but a wonderful support of the breadth of humanity in this anti-DEI time. &amp;gt; We must, then, avoid the “Babel syndrome,” namely the idolatry of profit that sacrifices the weak, a uniformity that neutralizes differences, and the pretense that a single language — even a digital one — can translate everything, including the mystery of the person, into data and performance. There is a lot to read…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48265372&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; As Pope Francis warned, we must realistically ask ourselves who holds this power today and how they use it: “It must also be recognized that nuclear energy, biotechnology, information technology, knowledge of our own DNA, and many other abilities which we have acquired… have given those with the knowledge, and especially the economic resources to use them, an impressive dominance over the whole of humanity and the entire world.” [7] In the past, it was largely up to the State to guide and…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48267945&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;“technology is never neutral, because it takes on the characteristics of those who devise, finance, regulate, and use it,” If critical decisions affecting human life—such as hiring, lending, crime prediction, and welfare—are processed in an opaque black box, people will lose their fundamental right to explain their context or appeal against the machine&amp;#39;s algorithmic verdicts&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some find the call to build a &amp;#34;civilization of love&amp;#34; through small, virtuous acts more compelling than Silicon Valley manifestos &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48265391&quot; title=&quot;When he quoted Tolkien, my heart stopped. This passage might provide you with a suggestion on how to live a virtuous life: &amp;#39;The twentieth-century Catholic author J.R.R. Tolkien, in the words of a protagonist in one of his novels, described our responsibility in this way: “It is not our part to master all the tides of the world, but to do what is in us for the succour of those years wherein we are set, uprooting the evil in the fields that we know, so that those who live after may have clean…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266040&quot; title=&quot;I have only read a few passages (and some of the excellent quotes others have shared here), but I find the underlying message here so much more compelling than those found in the various &amp;#39;manifestos&amp;#39; which come out of Silicon Valley. I think reading this helps me imagine a version of the future I&amp;#39;d actually like to live in. A version where technology is used well (rather than preaching for abstinence from technology) and where values other than &amp;#39;intelligence&amp;#39; (in whatever guise) are on an equal…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others remain skeptical, questioning if society has ever successfully &amp;#34;tamed&amp;#34; a technology for the collective good without a primary economic incentive &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271286&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m curious if there has ever been an instance where people have been able to &amp;#39;tame&amp;#39; a technology to consider a broader, societal good, or if we&amp;#39;ve always just been at the whims of how any particular tech naturally concentrates or dissipates power. For example, if you look at the boom of the middle classes in the mid 20th century, this appears to me largely a consequence of the fact that industrial technology at the time was both incredibly productive compared to what came before but it also…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the text&amp;#39;s warnings against a &amp;#34;uniformity that eliminates diversity&amp;#34; sparked debate over the modern politicization of language regarding inclusion [1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nolanlawson.com/2026/05/25/using-ai-to-write-better-code-more-slowly/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Using AI to write better code more slowly&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nolanlawson.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48272984&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1252 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 446 comments · by signa11&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nolan Lawson argues that AI should be used as a methodical tool for rigorous code review and bug detection rather than just a means to increase speed, advocating for a slower, quality-focused development process that prioritizes codebase health over raw output. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nolanlawson.com/2026/05/25/using-ai-to-write-better-code-more-slowly/&quot; title=&quot;Using AI to write better code more slowly    A lot of people seem convinced that the point of AI coding is to write low-quality code as fast as possible. Spew out barely-passable slop, open massive PRs, and merge them unvetted. Ship it! But t…    # [Read the Tea Leaves](https://nolanlawson.com/) Software and other dark arts, by Nolan Lawson    ![Search](https://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/pub/springloaded/images/search-btn.gif?m=1230136840i)    * [Home](https://nolanlawson.com/)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Experienced developers are shifting from &amp;#34;one-shot&amp;#34; prompting to a labor-intensive, multi-agent workflow involving iterative planning, cross-model reviews, and rigorous testing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273624&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve hit this point with AI where it&amp;#39;s not a simple process, but a long drawn out back and forth. I&amp;#39;ll use AI to design the implementation of a medium sized, cross cutting feature. Review all the details, maybe iterate on just that. Then implement with Claude 4.7 Max - which runs slower, but does a better job. Then review the implementation, then have Codex GPT 5.5 xhigh fast review it - which almost always finds corner cases. Have Claude fix those - Claude is better at writing intuitive…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273724&quot; title=&quot;yes exactly. Too many people ask AI to one-shot complex tasks, and wonder it behaves like a junior asked to rush something. I have my own skill: 5 rounds of research/planning/test-planning. Interactive with me in loop for all important decisions. Starts with high level shape, then details. Planning can take 2-3 days of my time, then the implementation agent can take many hours (Opus 4.7). It splits the implementation across many phases/commits, each with its own code-review fix loop. Deep code…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While proponents argue this &amp;#34;babysitting&amp;#34; process results in higher-quality code and faster delivery than manual work &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273624&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve hit this point with AI where it&amp;#39;s not a simple process, but a long drawn out back and forth. I&amp;#39;ll use AI to design the implementation of a medium sized, cross cutting feature. Review all the details, maybe iterate on just that. Then implement with Claude 4.7 Max - which runs slower, but does a better job. Then review the implementation, then have Codex GPT 5.5 xhigh fast review it - which almost always finds corner cases. Have Claude fix those - Claude is better at writing intuitive…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273724&quot; title=&quot;yes exactly. Too many people ask AI to one-shot complex tasks, and wonder it behaves like a junior asked to rush something. I have my own skill: 5 rounds of research/planning/test-planning. Interactive with me in loop for all important decisions. Starts with high level shape, then details. Planning can take 2-3 days of my time, then the implementation agent can take many hours (Opus 4.7). It splits the implementation across many phases/commits, each with its own code-review fix loop. Deep code…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273762&quot; title=&quot;I don’t think you’re quite getting what OP is describing. I work in a similar way… I am aware of all the code being written. If Claude had an outage I could write it myself. It would just take longer. You say “all that time” babysitting AIs but in my experience it isn’t that much time, if anything the back and forth at the planning stages is more productive than when I’m doing it by myself because I’m being asked questions and having to think things through from different angles.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, critics dismiss it as &amp;#34;busy work&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;AI psychosis&amp;#34; that sacrifices deep mental models for a ritualistic, over-engineered process &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273686&quot; title=&quot;And then Anthropic has an outage and you what...have a coffee break until then?  All that time babysitting the AIs just to be a little faster but probably with less knowledge/control over what they did?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48274308&quot; title=&quot;This all sounds insane. If it requires so much back and forth with the AI why on earth wouldn&amp;#39;t you just write the code yourself? At least then you build the mental model of the code and keep your brain healthy. Reading the comments in here about all the hoops people are having to jump through just to do the same thing they were doing a year ago without AI... and spending a fortune to do it! I think you&amp;#39;ve all got AI psychosis.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48274015&quot; title=&quot;That sounds too much like three weeks of work saving you three hours of planning. In my experience, software engineering is a matter of knowledge. Understanding it and then coming up with a solution. The latter is a flash of insight that comes mostly from experience. Then you gather more information to flesh it out, or brainstorm it with your colleagues. What you&amp;#39;re describing sounds more like a ritual of doing busy work than anything practical. Because tasks vary so much. A feature may be…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant disagreement regarding the sustainability of this approach, with some praising the productivity of parallel task-swapping while others warn it will lead to rapid burnout &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273860&quot; title=&quot;If you only have one AI window open, you’re doing it wrong.  You task swap to another window/agent, get it working on something, rinse and repeat.  I can keep 4 busy most of the time.  When I task swap I also check in on what the other agents are doing to make sure they’re on track, not blocked and not struggling.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48274088&quot; title=&quot;congratulations on your soon to be coming burnout. Keeping that many tasks in parallel, running all the time will kill you.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tomshardware.com/software/linux/california-moves-to-exempt-linux-from-its-upcoming-age-verification-law-after-backlash-over-forcing-operating-systems-to-collect-users-ages-amendment-proposed-by-the-same-lawmaker-who-wrote-the-original-law&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;California moves to exempt Linux from its age-verification law after backlash&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tomshardware.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48269961&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1066 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 499 comments · by rbanffy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;California lawmakers proposed an amendment to the Digital Age Assurance Act to exempt open-source operating systems like Linux from upcoming age-verification requirements. While mainstream distributions would be excluded, commercial platforms with proprietary ecosystems, such as Valve&amp;#39;s SteamOS, may still be subject to the law when it takes effect in 2027. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tomshardware.com/software/linux/california-moves-to-exempt-linux-from-its-upcoming-age-verification-law-after-backlash-over-forcing-operating-systems-to-collect-users-ages-amendment-proposed-by-the-same-lawmaker-who-wrote-the-original-law&quot; title=&quot;California moves to exempt Linux from its upcoming age-verification law after backlash over forcing operating systems to collect users’ ages — amendment proposed by the same lawmaker who wrote the original law    SteamOS could still be affected    ![](https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p/?c1=2&amp;amp;c2=10055482&amp;amp;cv=4.4.0&amp;amp;cj=1)    [Skip to main content](#main)    Unlock world-class roadmaps &amp;amp; trusted Bench data.  See More    ×    ## Unparalleled insights. Industry analysis. Insider access.    **Tom&amp;#39;s Hardware** Premium…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether age-verification laws should exist at all, with some arguing that any such mandate is an overreach and that the government should not be responsible for raising children &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48270643&quot; title=&quot;No such mandates should take place at all.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271390&quot; title=&quot;This is correct. It is not the government&amp;#39;s job to raise our children. The more we ask the gov&amp;#39;t to do that we should do, the less power we actually have. Some will say this ship has sailed, well, I say it&amp;#39;s not too late to sink it.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48269980&quot; title=&quot;No, not exemptions! Drop the stupid-ass law all together.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents of a technical solution suggest using browser-level parental controls and &amp;#34;Restricted to Adults&amp;#34; (RTA) headers to filter content without invasive tracking, though they disagree on whether sites should be &amp;#34;unsafe&amp;#34; by default or face fines for omitting headers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48270018&quot; title=&quot;The only device mandates that should be taking place is for the default installations of web clients should be checking to see if parental controls are enabled.  This only impacts the major browsers.  An intern at each browser company could add this check in minutes.  If they are enabled and the person logged in is on a regular account (not admin or power user of sorts) then the base installation of web clients must check for an RTA header [1].  If present, prompt for a override password and…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271453&quot; title=&quot;I think the header/metatag is designed poorly. The RTA proposal is that every operator of every site must verify the content and add the header to mark the site as &amp;#39;safe&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;unsafe&amp;#39;. This is unnecessary burden that they have to bear if this proposal is given a green light and this is wrong. Instead, the default should be, that if there is no header or it cannot be parsed, then the content is unsafe. And if there is a header, it describes the page rating, like what kind of dangerous content it…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics of these proposals note that a universal rating system is difficult to implement across different cultures and that current header standards are insufficient for nuanced content &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48272574&quot; title=&quot;The page having a simple rating assumes there can be one mapping from content to rating for the whole world.  I doubt we can even have one for North America and Europe.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48270218&quot; title=&quot;I largely agree, but the RTA header doesn&amp;#39;t seem to be good enough for most websites to use. When a website wants to block browsers with parental controls on, but it isn&amp;#39;t porn and it shouldn&amp;#39;t be blocked by SafeSearch, what do they do? https://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/140733/how-to...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Meanwhile, parents express frustration that modern browser features like DNS-over-HTTPS bypass local filtering tools, leaving them with few practical ways to protect children without legislative intervention &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48270694&quot; title=&quot;I agree with you, as a longtime free speech believe. but... I would also like to keep my kids from seeing the very worst of the internet before they&amp;#39;re ready to handle it. I tried using a PiHole but Firefox DNS-over-HTTPS nullifies that now. It&amp;#39;s not realistic for me to be watching over their shoulders 24/7; what can I do to keep them away from stuff 99% of people agree isn&amp;#39;t for children to see, without something like this?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271548&quot; title=&quot;I am sick of these &amp;#39;government bad&amp;#39; takes. They lack constructive suggestions, like your &amp;#39;sink it&amp;#39; nugget, they lack decent problem descriptions, as if anything after the sinking (likely private governance, aka feudalism) is immune to the ills of big-gov, and on top perpetuate reductivist arguments as if any kind of restrictions of freedom is by definition bad. This broad rejection without good reasons is borderline sociopathic. ... and parental control is not the gov raising anyone.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ferrari.com/en-EN/auto/ferrari-luce&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ferrari Luce&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ferrari.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271629&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;500 points · &lt;strong&gt;922 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by jumploops&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ferrari has officially unveiled the Luce, the Italian automaker&amp;#39;s first-ever fully electric vehicle, marking a historic shift toward electrification for the Maranello-based brand. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ferrari.com/en-EN/auto/ferrari-luce&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.topgear.com&amp;amp;#x2F;car-news&amp;amp;#x2F;electric&amp;amp;#x2F;its-finally-here-meet-ferrari-luce-maranellos-first-ever-fully-electric-car&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.topgear.com&amp;amp;#x2F;car-news&amp;amp;#x2F;electric&amp;amp;#x2F;its-finally-here-m...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Ferrari Luce has faced sharp criticism for its aesthetic, with commenters describing it as a &amp;#34;budget sedan&amp;#34; or a &amp;#34;cheap electric knockoff&amp;#34; that lacks the brand&amp;#39;s traditional heritage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271831&quot; title=&quot;Specs are insane but why does it look like a budget sedan with a cool paint job? This sounds kind of fun. It’s curious they weren’t allowed to drive though.. &amp;gt; But I can say that the Torque Shift Engagement system — which gives the driver five power levels on the right paddle and five engine-braking levels on the left — is one of the most intriguing ideas I’ve seen in an electric car. It doesn’t simulate gear changes. It creates an entirely new torque language controlled by the driver,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48274371&quot; title=&quot;Horrible. I don&amp;#39;t care if it was designed by Armani in his deathbed or Jony Ive himself. It&amp;#39;s just horrible. The flat sides, not even reminiscence of the testarossa glorious days. Worse than the tesla truck and that&amp;#39;s in the lowest levels of design. Be careful not to take the Jaguar road for there is no coming back.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48272760&quot; title=&quot;Looks luke a cheap electric knockoff in some low budget racing game.  It does not look like a ferrari at all.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some find the &amp;#34;Torque Shift Engagement&amp;#34; system a promising way to restore driver engagement in EVs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271831&quot; title=&quot;Specs are insane but why does it look like a budget sedan with a cool paint job? This sounds kind of fun. It’s curious they weren’t allowed to drive though.. &amp;gt; But I can say that the Torque Shift Engagement system — which gives the driver five power levels on the right paddle and five engine-braking levels on the left — is one of the most intriguing ideas I’ve seen in an electric car. It doesn’t simulate gear changes. It creates an entirely new torque language controlled by the driver,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue the technical specs are inefficient compared to existing EVs and the interior controls are ergonomically flawed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273483&quot; title=&quot;Just 280+ mile EPA range on a 122 kwH battery. 5100 pounds. 2.5s to 60. Not insane by any standard, ICE or EV.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273630&quot; title=&quot;Yeah that&amp;#39;s actually rather inefficient. Tesla Model Y has 84kWh battery and a range of 300 miles.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48272889&quot; title=&quot;Ive is an overrated plonker and my first reaction is to wonder if all the serviceable components are glued in place. Do you know why no one has ever put rotating switches on a steering wheel face before? Because it requires two fingers to operate the switches and thus taking your entire hand off the wheel. Those knobs and switches might as well be in the center console because it takes a similar amount of effort and diversion of attention to operate. This looks like a car designed by someone…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the consensus on its &amp;#34;hideous&amp;#34; design and $650,000 price tag, some defenders suggest the polarizing look is a deliberate attempt to create a new icon, similar to the Cybertruck &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271717&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t like it at all. The curves, the silhouette, does not work at all, it does not &amp;#39;speak&amp;#39; to me as a Ferrari. Again, a heritage brand ruined by an obnoxious, pesky iPad like display that has no business being in a Ferrari. The front profile is hideous too.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48274198&quot; title=&quot;Lots of comments saying it looks ugly. I don&amp;#39;t agree. But the $650,000 price tag is not pretty - that I can agree on. I know people will pay that.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273097&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t love it either, but that&amp;#39;s the whole point I think. Try to pull off an icon, rather than make existing designs works. Cybertruck did it, same with Jaguar. Ultimately the probably should&amp;#39;ve gone with SUV tho - it&amp;#39;s what people buy and looking at interior it what should&amp;#39;ve been - mass produced, luxury, performance car for everyone. p.s. Car ethusiasts suck and nobody should listen to them. All they want is v8 manual from 80s with all the &amp;#39;character&amp;#39; which means it&amp;#39;s impractical,…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stevemagness.substack.com/p/the-cost-of-safetyism&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What we lost when we stopped letting kids leave the front yard&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (stevemagness.substack.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48267290&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;549 points · &lt;strong&gt;608 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by obscurette&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Despite data showing the world is safer than in previous decades, modern &amp;#34;safetyism&amp;#34; and parental anxiety have drastically restricted children&amp;#39;s autonomy, leading to increased youth mental health issues and a lack of essential life skills like conflict resolution and risk assessment. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stevemagness.substack.com/p/the-cost-of-safetyism&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Cost of Safetyism    URL Source: https://stevemagness.substack.com/p/the-cost-of-safetyism    Published Time: 2026-05-19T10:03:28+00:00    Markdown Content:  When I was 11 and 12, I’d ride my bike to meet friends at the local sandlot baseball field 1.5 miles away, or to a friends house to go play pickup football in the street. When I was 14, I’d go on 10+ mile runs, exploring every bit of road, sidewalk, and path I could find. Exploration was a rite of passage.    Today, 84% of 11 year olds…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The decline of childhood independence is largely attributed to suburban design that lacks walkable destinations and enforces strict zoning, effectively trapping children in &amp;#34;micro islands&amp;#34; without a car &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48274897&quot; title=&quot;What I see in my deep suburbia is just far less interest in wandering past the front yard, because there&amp;#39;s nothing to do: House after house where no front yard has anything for anyone, and quite long distances before you get somewhere you might be welcome, or have a chair. When my son, a pre-teen at the time went to Spain with me, things were quite different: A small town that even had stores targeting kids, places to sit everywhere, things to see, other people walking too. He could even go to…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48279129&quot; title=&quot;I remember being young when &amp;#39;kids don&amp;#39;t play in the yard anymore, they just play on their phone/consoles/computer&amp;#39; started to be a big talking point. Even then I recognized that the reason I was on the computer so much was, at least in part, because it was so much easier to hang out with my friends online than it was to coordinate with my parents to try and get travel to their house, or to convince my parents to let a friend come over. And I consider myself relatively lucky in that part of the…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48277476&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; But it&amp;#39;s amazing how much modern-ish suburbia just has no place for you to even exist without a car. It&amp;#39;s trendy to blame cars for this but the problem is fundamentally zoning. It&amp;#39;s not that there is nowhere for you to exist without a car, it&amp;#39;s that there is nowhere for you to exist there at all , and you thereby need a car to leave the vicinity in order to get anywhere you can. If you want to build a cafe or an arcade or a hackerspace out in suburbia, can you? That&amp;#39;s not even about density.…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that families should simply move to urban centers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48275626&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Build environments where children can be independent, and they might even want to be. We _have_ built these environments, you just choose not to live in them. Move to a city or other urban center. Your house might be smaller, and you might have to take public transit sometimes, but you will be happier and there will be no shortage of places for your kid to walk.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that restrictive housing laws and high costs prevent many from accessing these environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48277817&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; But life is full of safety vs. living tradeoffs. That&amp;#39;s not even the issue. Suppose that more people wanted to live in a city than currently do. The market implies that -- the price per square foot is higher in cities. And that&amp;#39;s the problem, when the city isn&amp;#39;t allowed to grow. The existing city already has tall buildings, so if there is more demand than supply, to create more of it you need to add more somewhere else, i.e. build some taller buildings where there are currently suburbs. Which…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Safety concerns have also shifted from &amp;#34;stranger danger&amp;#34; to the physical threat of modern vehicles, as the rising height of SUVs and trucks makes children invisible to drivers and increases the lethality of accidents &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48268305&quot; title=&quot;I want to let my kids walk wherever they want to. It’s great for them. My 5 year old bikes to school, accompanied by an adult.  It’s a bit more than half a mile away from the house. I’d like to tell him he can do this on his own next year, but there’s a single intersection he has to cross that makes this difficult. I’m not worried about him getting lost, abducted by a stranger or any host of movie plot scenarios.  I’m worried about vehicles.  Specifically pickup trucks and SUVs. 40 years ago a…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48268675&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m almost 2 meters tall and was crossing a street at a crosswalk with my bike yesterday, walking and pushing it at normal walking speeds, like the law requires. There was a car about to turn left from the lanes going left. There was a car from the lanes going right (the closest lanes to me) that slowed down as I started crossing the street. I assumed they saw me and that&amp;#39;s why they were slowing down. Nope - they almost hit me but managed to hit the brakes very hard at the last possible second.…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48274140&quot; title=&quot;I can think of so many reasons but the biggest I think is the reduction of community.  - When I was a kid mums worked part time or not at all. We had school fates and lots more community gatherings.  - Dads didn&amp;#39;t work as hard. Half of them would be at your soccer practice at 6pm to hang out  - Parents were on local sports teams together or other social groups as well  - You did most of your shopping at the local shops, you knew the people that lived in the suburb. You ran into them picking up the…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the loss of tight-knit local communities and third places like arcades or cafes has removed the &amp;#34;eyes on the street&amp;#34; that once allowed children to roam safely &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48279129&quot; title=&quot;I remember being young when &amp;#39;kids don&amp;#39;t play in the yard anymore, they just play on their phone/consoles/computer&amp;#39; started to be a big talking point. Even then I recognized that the reason I was on the computer so much was, at least in part, because it was so much easier to hang out with my friends online than it was to coordinate with my parents to try and get travel to their house, or to convince my parents to let a friend come over. And I consider myself relatively lucky in that part of the…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48274140&quot; title=&quot;I can think of so many reasons but the biggest I think is the reduction of community.  - When I was a kid mums worked part time or not at all. We had school fates and lots more community gatherings.  - Dads didn&amp;#39;t work as hard. Half of them would be at your soccer practice at 6pm to hang out  - Parents were on local sports teams together or other social groups as well  - You did most of your shopping at the local shops, you knew the people that lived in the suburb. You ran into them picking up the…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/21/six-search-engines-worth-trying-now-that-google-isnt-really-google-anymore/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Search engines alternatives now that Google isn&amp;#39;t Google anymore&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techcrunch.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266051&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;571 points · 580 comments · by elorant&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As Google Search shifts toward a conversational, AI-driven interface, users seeking traditional results can turn to alternatives like Kagi, DuckDuckGo, Startpage, &amp;amp;udm=14, Brave, and Ecosia, many of which offer options to disable AI features and prioritize user privacy. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/21/six-search-engines-worth-trying-now-that-google-isnt-really-google-anymore/&quot; title=&quot;Six search engines worth trying now that Google isn’t really Google anymore | TechCrunch    Google is about to look really different, and if you&amp;#39;re not a fan of the AI overview feature, then you&amp;#39;re not going to like what&amp;#39;s coming.    –:–:–:–    The first StrictlyVC of 2026 hits SF on April 30. Tickets are going fast. [Register now.](https://techcrunch.com/events/strictlyvc-san-francisco-2026/?utm_source=tc&amp;amp;utm_medium=ad&amp;amp;utm_campaign=svcsf2026&amp;amp;utm_content=ticketsales&amp;amp;promo=topbanner&amp;amp;display=)    Get…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are increasingly turning to paid alternatives like Kagi, praising its superior result quality, personalization, and the ability to keep AI features optional and unobtrusive &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266174&quot; title=&quot;I switched to Kagi little over a year ago and couldn’t recommend it enough. The search results are actually what I’m searching for, there is AI for the occasions I want it (and only then), and it comes with nice extras like search personalization and a great translation app. Tried to live without it when my first year of subscription ran out, but I didn’t last long…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266286&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been a Kagi subscriber for several years now. If you&amp;#39;re questioning the AI features, know that I am only barely aware they exist. I have never, not even once, accidentally or otherwise, engaged the AI features without going out of my way to do so. I&amp;#39;ve never seen what their AI is like. I have no idea what it&amp;#39;s for or why I&amp;#39;d want it. It&amp;#39;s beautiful. Kagi has AI I suppose, but it&amp;#39;s over there and not in my face. I don&amp;#39;t think I&amp;#39;ve ever seen an AI nag in the UI, but their UI itself is also…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266133&quot; title=&quot;Kagi. Just use Kagi. It is by far far far the best. Best money I spend, aside from Fastmail. https://kagi.com/&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some critics express concern that Kagi primarily aggregates results from existing indexes like Google and Bing rather than building its own infrastructure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266687&quot; title=&quot;I paid for Kagi for a bit, but got a weird vibe when I realized they were working pretty hard to paper over the fact that they pay a third party to scrape Google search results for them. The public-facing side of that coin is Kagi&amp;#39;s position that Google should make their index available to competitors (see https://blog.kagi.com/waiting-dawn-search ). All that&amp;#39;s to say: when I paid for Kagi, I thought I was investing in additional search infrastructure, and didn&amp;#39;t realize Kagi had no aspirations…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, Kagi staff clarified they are actively developing specialized and general-purpose indexes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48267007&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; didn&amp;#39;t realize Kagi had no aspirations to build their own general purpose index Kagi employee here. We&amp;#39;re actively working on building our own indexes beyond the limited ones we have now, not just a general index but also purpose built indexes for things like programming, etc.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the growing popularity of ad-free or privacy-focused options like DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Uruky &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266551&quot; title=&quot;While there are good alternatives like DuckDuckGo, Mojeek, or Ecosia, there are also ad-free alternatives, where you&amp;#39;re not the product, like Kagi [1] or Uruky [2] (I co-founded Uruky, which is also currently and for the foreseeable future &amp;#39;No-AI&amp;#39;)! [1]: https://kagi.com [2]: https://uruky.com&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266237&quot; title=&quot;I usually switch between DuckDuckGo and Startpage. Both are good.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, some users still defend Google’s AI Overviews for providing direct answers without the friction of modern web browsing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266241&quot; title=&quot;I must be the only person in this website who is happy with the AI Overview feature. It messes up sometimes (very rarely) but so do websites. And between ads, cookie popups, newsletter popups, notification permission popups, websites with a high Time to First Byte, and all the useless filler around the content,  websites are a nightmare to browse. I would say that for almost all of my searches the AI Overview feature contains exactly the answer I was looking for, and I don’t even have to leave…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, noting that many consumers remain &amp;#34;allergic&amp;#34; to paying for search &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266891&quot; title=&quot;Nobody wants to pay for anything, so the services that figured out how to profit from people not paying will win. There was this idea born in the late &amp;#39;90&amp;#39;s/early 00&amp;#39;s that everything digital should be free. The internet was dominated by teenagers with no job and no credit card, so it made sense. But the result of that has been a whole generation with an allergy to compensation, and the inability for anyone to compete with &amp;#39;free&amp;#39; services, even if everyone hates that service.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://geohot.github.io//blog/jekyll/update/2026/05/24/the-eternal-sloptember.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Eternal Sloptember&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (geohot.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48263238&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;489 points · 373 comments · by razin&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;George Hotz argues that adopting AI agents for software development is a costly mistake, as these statistical models produce increasingly undetectable &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; that lacks the quality, polish, and error correction required for genuine engineering. &lt;a href=&quot;https://geohot.github.io//blog/jekyll/update/2026/05/24/the-eternal-sloptember.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Eternal Sloptember    URL Source: https://geohot.github.io/blog/jekyll/update/2026/05/24/the-eternal-sloptember.html    Published Time: 2026-05-24T00:00:00-07:00    Markdown Content:  I’m calling it now, the adoption of AI agents into software development will be one of the most costly mistakes in the field’s history. Agents cannot program, and it’s taking longer and longer to realize that they can’t. They are a highly sophisticated statistical model designed to mimic the distribution of…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current discourse on LLMs is often polarized between &amp;#34;luddites&amp;#34; and the &amp;#34;ai-pilled,&amp;#34; obscuring the reality that these models typically get users 80-95% of the way toward a solution &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48263653&quot; title=&quot;I think a lot of the problem with the current discourse is how black-and-white it is. Either you&amp;#39;re a luddite or &amp;#39;ai pilled&amp;#39;. In most cases, LLMs can get you 80-95% of the way, sometimes less, sometimes more. And heck, sometimes, it just gets you somewhere wrong. But it seems everyone is arguing about whether LLMs can be perfect software engineers in isolation running in a closet, and using that to say that LLMs do not have a massive potential in other scenarios. Sometimes, I like to imagine…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that AI is merely a sophisticated search tool over existing knowledge &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48263476&quot; title=&quot;With the level of ability that AI is at right now, I&amp;#39;ve found it useful personally to think of it something like a very good search over existing knowledge. Another step up in searchability in the lineage of reference books, stack overflow, GitHub etc. Programmers are rewriting and reinventing the same techniques more often than any other vocation I can think of, and so we were primed for a really good search over prior art. The fact that AI can also adapt that prior art to your particular use…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others emphasize that its speed often outweighs the superior quality of hand-crafted code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48263532&quot; title=&quot;I agree that I can write better code than an agent. But it can write working code much faster than I can. And in a lot of cases, unfortunately, faster beats better.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is significant debate regarding the historical context of &amp;#34;Luddism,&amp;#34; with some noting that the original movement was a protest against the fraudulent manufacture of inferior goods rather than technology itself &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48264066&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s funny, but the more I know about the true Luddites, the more I see their point of view. &amp;#39; the original Luddites were primarily protesting against machinery used to &amp;#39;fraudulently and deceitfully&amp;#39; manufacture inferior goods, bypass labor standards, and strip skilled artisans of their livelihoods.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48264269&quot; title=&quot;Goods are usually (although not always) inferior when made by a machine. A hand-crafted solid wood table is still superior to something from Ikea. Of course hand made tables are expensive. They service a sliver of the market. Ikea serves the rest of us who&amp;#39;d prefer not to eat off the floor. Fundamentally, Luddites didn&amp;#39;t like being replaced by a machine. They were skilled workers, who used to have very desirable skills. Most people didn&amp;#39;t need their standard of quality (but customers had no…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics of the &amp;#34;anti-AI&amp;#34; sentiment point out a lack of specific technical examples showing where models fail &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48263610&quot; title=&quot;Part of my job is working on trying to make these models productive for the large corporation I work for. It&amp;#39;s a lot of throwing tomatoes at a wall and to a degree I see the issue he is talking about output seemingly having a certain ceiling. At the same time in no part of his post is any code snippet or anything to latch on to of &amp;#39;the model performed poorly here when it should have done this&amp;#39; - this style of criticism seems to be a pattern of most of these &amp;#39;the LLMs will never work&amp;#39; style…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, while proponents of manual coding worry that over-reliance on AI could lead to a loss of fundamental engineering skills &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48263824&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I&amp;#39;m in the &amp;#39;haven&amp;#39;t written any code in a while&amp;#39; boat ATM How long do you think it will be before you can&amp;#39;t write any code because you&amp;#39;re out of practice? One of the dangers of engineering management is that it can turn you into a person that can no longer do the thing. Does that even matter?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2014/04/creativity-walk&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Taking a walk may lead to more creativity than sitting, study finds (2014)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (apa.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48272670&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;615 points · 235 comments · by bilsbie&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A study published by the American Psychological Association found that walking, whether indoors or outdoors, significantly boosts creative thinking and the generation of novel ideas compared to sitting. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2014/04/creativity-walk&quot; title=&quot;Title: Taking a Walk May Lead to More Creativity than Sitting, Study Finds    URL Source: https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2014/04/creativity-walk    Published Time: 2014-04-24    Markdown Content:  WASHINGTON — When the task at hand requires some imagination, taking a walk may lead to more creative thinking than sitting, according to research published by the American Psychological Association.    “Many people anecdotally claim they do their best thinking when walking,” said Marily Oppezzo, PhD,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely agree that walking or running without digital distractions fosters problem-solving and creativity, with some noting that &amp;#34;incubation&amp;#34; occurs best when the mind is free from music or podcasts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48274464&quot; title=&quot;I was a doubter until COVID. Then I built a habit of 30 to 60+ minutes of walking a day, ~1.5 to 5mi depending on length and pace. Geez , the amount of stuff I got done, problems I solved, and general boost to well-being I achieved was lost on me until a job pushed those walks out of the workday. My productivity wasn’t the same. Definitely going to block off a walk around the harbor during most workdays going forward so I can refresh the slate so to speak.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48274856&quot; title=&quot;Not OP, but it has to be a walk with no headphones for me. As I walk, thoughts seem to bubble up from my subconscious and present themselves for consideration. This doesn’t happen as often if I’m listening to music.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48274955&quot; title=&quot;I don’t walk but I run 60-120 min 4-5x a week and could not imagine doing so with headphones. Firmly believe we need time away from the constant stimulation of modern life.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273857&quot; title=&quot;Walking, showering, sleeping, and riding a bike are great ways to debug code. It&amp;#39;s very cool to go to sleep and wake up knowing what the solution to the problem is. The key for incubation for me is to make sure my brain can churn without distractions (that means no listening to podcasts, music, etc while performing said action).&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some find physical activity too taxing without entertainment, others advocate for &amp;#34;dumbphones&amp;#34; or offline periods to escape algorithmic stimulation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48275242&quot; title=&quot;I decided to go offline for this summer. I got a dumb phone and a card for public transportation, instead of the app I&amp;#39;m using now. Downtime from the algorithmic manipulation has been the breeding ground for my creativity and this is one more step to this direction.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48275274&quot; title=&quot;I wish more people knew you can turn iPhones and Androids into dumbphones through MDM and other methods. It would save people money , you wouldn&amp;#39;t have to sacrifice security, and they wouldn&amp;#39;t complain about losing Google maps or Signal. Result is no ability to install apps and no web browsing. It&amp;#39;s really a smart, smartphone because you get the benefits of it being smart without becoming dumb through the distractions.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48275196&quot; title=&quot;I wish I could do the same, but the running(even at low pace like 6mph) is too taxing without something fun to watch&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion highlights the historical concept of *solvitur ambulando* (&amp;#34;it is solved by walking&amp;#34;), though some note that crowded environments can turn a relaxing walk into a source of frustration &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48272847&quot; title=&quot;There is even a latin phrase for it: solvitur ambulando. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solvitur_ambulando&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273608&quot; title=&quot;Unless you like me, like to walk fast so you go back home ungrier than never because: 1. people walking like turtle in front of you 2. people on phone not looking at where they go 3. both&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;http://androidessence.com/leave-me-behind/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Leave Me Behind&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (androidessence.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48265876&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;348 points · 315 comments · by mooreds&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reflecting on a decade-long career, an Android developer argues that AI-driven coding devalues the essential human connections, critical thinking, and community-driven learning that define software development as a craft. &lt;a href=&quot;http://androidessence.com/leave-me-behind/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Leave Me Behind    URL Source: http://androidessence.com/leave-me-behind/    Published Time: 2026-05-17    Markdown Content:  &amp;gt; “If you don’t learn how to use AI, you’re going to be left behind.”    So leave me behind.    * * *    I learned to build Android applications in 2014. I was in college taking a Java programming class, when a classmate shared a free online course to learn Android development. The goal was short: build a todo list app with local storage.    When I completed the minimum…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of generative AI in software development has sparked a debate between those who view it as a &amp;#34;stochastic code extruder&amp;#34; that degrades software quality and harms users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48268658&quot; title=&quot;There are a number of comments here where people open up about their contrasting experiences of not being a part of a programming community. Those are well addressed, I think, but there is another point to consider. We need to remember the people, that we may never talk to, that are downstream of all of this software. Not necessarily “the users” as there are many pieces of software meant for other devs, but I think the users deserve consideration nonetheless. Handing over software quality to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48269011&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Handing over software quality to the stochastic code extruder is causing a sharp drop in the quality of software put out into the world. Well, first of all you and the author point to the same derisive comment of these models being, in your words &amp;#39;stochastic code extruder&amp;#39; or the one I have heard a lot &amp;#39;next-token predictors&amp;#39;, and the connotation I read from these being that this makes them inherently dumb or unintelligent and I don&amp;#39;t understand that. The fact that these &amp;#39;stochastic code…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, and those who see it as a liberating tool that lowers barriers for ambitious personal projects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266618&quot; title=&quot;Really? I&amp;#39;m more motivated than ever to make stuff at the moment. I have a long list of projects I&amp;#39;ve always wanted to make, but I never had time. The barrier is so low now. For example, I want to make: - A mini OS on top of SeL4 - A UI framework based on SolidJS, for native apps, in rust. - My own photo manager (which can do backups &amp;amp; sync across all my devices). And a gallery to share photos with friends - A local first data store, built on top of CRDTs - My own programming language And lots…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266817&quot; title=&quot;Everything I want to make is new. I don&amp;#39;t understand the objection. For example, the photo backup system I want to make will let me manage my ~400gb photo library. I want my library backed up on a couple devices, running linux and freebsd. I want my mac and iphone to have a local mirror of all the favorited photos, and when I&amp;#39;m at home, I want to be able to browse all photos from those devices by streaming them over the local network. I want native macos &amp;amp; ios app interfaces to view and manage…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that AI-driven automation is fundamentally different from historical precedents and may lead to intellectual stagnation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266408&quot; title=&quot;Hasn&amp;#39;t all automation up to this point been same input equals same output though? Automation using LLMs feels different to anything before and I don&amp;#39;t think there&amp;#39;s a comparative time in history to point at and say &amp;#39;look it happened before and we are now better off&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266611&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; take human intelligence to another pinnacle I see no indication that current human intelligence is at anything close to a historical pinnacle. Human knowledge, yes, but intelligence? No. Collectively, we&amp;#39;re dumb and trending dumber, and the tendency towards lazy thoughtlessness which AI engenders will accelerate that trend.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that it can effectively remove drudgery and even outperform mediocre human engineers in reliability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266817&quot; title=&quot;Everything I want to make is new. I don&amp;#39;t understand the objection. For example, the photo backup system I want to make will let me manage my ~400gb photo library. I want my library backed up on a couple devices, running linux and freebsd. I want my mac and iphone to have a local mirror of all the favorited photos, and when I&amp;#39;m at home, I want to be able to browse all photos from those devices by streaming them over the local network. I want native macos &amp;amp; ios app interfaces to view and manage…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48269011&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Handing over software quality to the stochastic code extruder is causing a sharp drop in the quality of software put out into the world. Well, first of all you and the author point to the same derisive comment of these models being, in your words &amp;#39;stochastic code extruder&amp;#39; or the one I have heard a lot &amp;#39;next-token predictors&amp;#39;, and the connotation I read from these being that this makes them inherently dumb or unintelligent and I don&amp;#39;t understand that. The fact that these &amp;#39;stochastic code…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics remain concerned that this &amp;#34;slop machine&amp;#34; demotivates original creation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266453&quot; title=&quot;A slop fork machine is way different though, I dont know why authors never thought about this but imagine a machine that  can detect the features and replicate whatever it sees, show it how to make bread once and it can do it infinitely, make it listen to a song and its able to find why it sounds the way it does and just spam variations, even if it doesnt make anything original it demotivates any attempt to push the boundaries or make anything new&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, while proponents argue that the time saved allows for a more personalized and independent digital life &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266618&quot; title=&quot;Really? I&amp;#39;m more motivated than ever to make stuff at the moment. I have a long list of projects I&amp;#39;ve always wanted to make, but I never had time. The barrier is so low now. For example, I want to make: - A mini OS on top of SeL4 - A UI framework based on SolidJS, for native apps, in rust. - My own photo manager (which can do backups &amp;amp; sync across all my devices). And a gallery to share photos with friends - A local first data store, built on top of CRDTs - My own programming language And lots…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266923&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s your time and life worth? You pay Apple to deal with it (which I do) and get to live a peaceful life and go out and take photos and have experiences. Or do you spend weeks implementing your own solution with Claude. The latter is considerably higher cost in time and money. AI is seen as a way out of drudgery but you&amp;#39;re just trading one problem for another.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://unix.foo/posts/nobody-cracks-open-a-programming-book/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Nobody cracks open a programming book anymore&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (unix.foo)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273030&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;310 points · &lt;strong&gt;351 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by zdw&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sales of physical programming books are sharply declining as developers shift toward AI tools like ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot for technical guidance, replacing the disciplined practice of manual study with instant, automated solutions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://unix.foo/posts/nobody-cracks-open-a-programming-book/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Nobody Cracks Open a Programming Book Anymore · unix.foo    URL Source: https://unix.foo/posts/nobody-cracks-open-a-programming-book/    Published Time: Mon, 25 May 2026 21:04:38 GMT    Markdown Content:  POSTS    A sad look at the state of modern programming books.    FILED 2026-05-25 WORDS 873 READ 5 MIN BY CYRUS    There was, for a long time, a wall.    If you walked into a book store, past the magazines and the cookbooks, you’d arrive at the computer section, and along one wall there was a stretch…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some argue that Stack Overflow is rapidly declining due to a toxic culture and the rise of AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273292&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Stack Overflow is receiving about 3,800 questions a month The crazy thing is that SO is dying so quickly that it&amp;#39;s already under half that amount. https://data.stackexchange.com/stackoverflow/query/1926661#g...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273380&quot; title=&quot;Did anyone actually like StackOverflow? Any question asked would be edited beyond recognition (and usually into brash rudeness). Half the answers were demanding ever increasing proof of work, and the other half told the OP that they shouldn&amp;#39;t even be trying to do what they&amp;#39;re doing. The only useful thing were opinion based posts from people with domain expertise, and SO kept trying to ban and remove those. It was the least helpful place online, but the most accessible, and it survived for lack…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273375&quot; title=&quot;Too early to call? It&amp;#39;s hit rock bottom. I&amp;#39;ve never seen a major site die so completely before.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others maintain that programming books remain essential for mastering complex concepts, idioms, and structured learning that documentation or LLMs cannot easily replicate &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273341&quot; title=&quot;Not true for everyone. I learned Rust from The Rust Programming Language (&amp;#39;The Rust Book&amp;#39;) and &amp;#39;Rust for Rustaceans.&amp;#39;  Sure, coming from C/C++, I could have learned the syntax online but learning best idioms and styles required the time and commitment to read a book cover-to-cover.  In fact, I&amp;#39;ve probably read each page in &amp;#39;Rust for Rustaceans&amp;#39; at least twice to ensure that I understood some of the more subtle points.  I could have developed a half-baked notion of how the borrow-checker worked…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273306&quot; title=&quot;Beyond the slowing you to type, the key part of the good books was the considered and mindful order of presentation. This is what had me spending money when I could get the reference manual for free - a guide , a book that taught me unfamiliar concepts in top down fashion, and took some degree of responsibility to be both accessible and comprehensive. I love the tutoring of LLM, but to this day as a complement to a guided book. I don&amp;#39;t find such guided books in computer science much anymore…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a debate regarding the future of junior developers: some believe they must read to acquire the &amp;#34;grammar&amp;#34; necessary to guide AI agents &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273198&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a shame because to guide a coding agent, you need to have the right grammar and vocabulary to describe what you want and how you want it to be built.  Junior devs should read not because they need to know how to write the code, but they need to know the vocabulary and the grammar to guide the agents.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, while others insist they must still learn to write code themselves to prevent a total loss of foundational knowledge &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273238&quot; title=&quot;Junior devs should still read to learn how to write the code. Surely the desired state isn&amp;#39;t that nobody knows how to write code any more right?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the perceived rarity of high-quality technical books, proponents value them for their mindful order of presentation and depth, often using LLMs as a supplementary tutoring tool rather than a replacement &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273306&quot; title=&quot;Beyond the slowing you to type, the key part of the good books was the considered and mindful order of presentation. This is what had me spending money when I could get the reference manual for free - a guide , a book that taught me unfamiliar concepts in top down fashion, and took some degree of responsibility to be both accessible and comprehensive. I love the tutoring of LLM, but to this day as a complement to a guided book. I don&amp;#39;t find such guided books in computer science much anymore…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273442&quot; title=&quot;Unfortunately even in the old days, a truly good programming book like you’re describing was depressingly rare. Younger me really enjoyed some of the game programming books by Andre Lamothe. Most “Learn Language X” books were terrible with over focus on syntax and very little thought into organization.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.businessinsider.com/uber-coo-andrew-macdonald-ai-token-spending-harder-justify-2026-5&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Uber’s COO says it’s getting harder to justify money spent on tokenmaxxing&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (businessinsider.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48268871&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;293 points · &lt;strong&gt;341 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by _____k&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Uber COO Andrew Macdonald stated that increasing AI costs are becoming difficult to justify as high token consumption has failed to deliver a proportional increase in useful consumer features or measurable productivity gains. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.businessinsider.com/uber-coo-andrew-macdonald-ai-token-spending-harder-justify-2026-5&quot; title=&quot;Uber&amp;#39;s COO says it&amp;#39;s getting harder to justify the money spent on AI tokenmaxxing    Operations chief Andrew Macdonald said he&amp;#39;s not seeing proportional productivity gains from increasing AI costs within Uber.    [Business…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the perceived absurdity of &amp;#34;tokenmaxxing,&amp;#34; with many users arguing that using AI consumption as a performance metric is a &amp;#34;red flag&amp;#34; that encourages wasteful spending over actual productivity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48269201&quot; title=&quot;What if... we stop for a moment, and then, after thinking for a moment, we stop hammering nails with a microscope, and stop using token usage as a metric of productivity? I know it&amp;#39;s sounds stupid, but what if&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48269118&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s amazing that it took months to figure this out. &amp;#39;Well we thought that if engineers are told to maximize costs through AI use, to consume as much as possible of a resource that costs us money, then obviously good things will happen. Imagine my surprise when it didn&amp;#39;t turn out that way.&amp;#39; Imagine if engineers were ranked based on their AWS spend. People allocate VMs and fill databases with terabytes of random bits, to get to the top of the AWS leaderboard. If you don&amp;#39;t do this, you&amp;#39;re ranked…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48269224&quot; title=&quot;If any company announces that they use token consumption as an employee performance signal, for me that&amp;#39;s close to a red flag to stay away from that company. No company with good engineering leadership should act like this is remotely a good idea.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics attribute these mandates to a lack of original leadership, suggesting that executives are acting like &amp;#34;lemmings&amp;#34; by forcing AI integration out of a fear of falling behind competitors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48269549&quot; title=&quot;There is a complete lack of courage in the leadership of tech companies today, and top-down AI mandates are just another manifestation. True visionaries think outside the box, but most tech executives are forcing their employees into black boxes, out of fear of not doing exactly what their competitors are doing. We have lemmings for leaders, and that means that—much like the LLMs that are being shoehorned into everything—there isn’t room for original thinking. Everyone’s strategy looks exactly…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48269312&quot; title=&quot;The people who have ascended to leadership positions are deeply divorced from reality. &amp;#39;It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.&amp;#39; -Upton Sinclair&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that such top-down pressure acts as a necessary &amp;#34;forcing function&amp;#34; to discover novel use cases among resistant staff, others contend that the high cost of tokens will eventually make human employees the more economical choice once subsidies end &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48270104&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m going to offer a contrarian view here: First is that despite a lot of waste, some innovation will arise from an enterprising employee finding some interesting use case.  A lot of the tokenmaxxing is just waste, but out of that waste may arise a small number of genuinely powerful use cases. Second is that many workers will be entrenched in their ways.  If your executive goal is to achieve the above (find innovative ways of using AI), then you need to move everyone to use it.  Most will just…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48269092&quot; title=&quot;As soon as tokens stop stop being subsidized, heavy agentic use will become as least as expensive than paying an (entry level) employee. When this happens many companies will trade off havy tolen usage for (maybe a bit slower, bit less accurate) employees again.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48269185&quot; title=&quot;You say &amp;#39;amazing that it took months to figure this out&amp;#39; as if the answer to the question is obvious. But it&amp;#39;s not. Some FAANGs are doing amazing things with unlimited tokens. Other companies have no clue what to do with tokens, they&amp;#39;ve just told their engineers to max them. It really depends on how you&amp;#39;re using the tokens . If you&amp;#39;re just using them for Codex and Claude Code - yeah, tokenmaxxing is incredibly dumb.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://thefrontpage.dev/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News front page as a site&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (thefrontpage.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271127&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;431 points · 118 comments · by thatxliner&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Front Page provides a curated overview of current tech and science news, featuring stories on AI coding agents, hardware innovations like Japan&amp;#39;s Mach-5 ramjet, cybersecurity seizures in the Netherlands, and scientific breakthroughs such as the discovery of how tobacco plants produce nicotine. &lt;a href=&quot;https://thefrontpage.dev/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Front Page    URL Source: https://thefrontpage.dev/    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1](https://thefrontpage.dev/divider.svg)    Hacker News    [6h, 401p, 151 comments](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48272984)    ## [Using AI to write better code more slowly](https://nolanlawson.com/2026/05/25/using-ai-to-write-better-code-more-slowly/)    ![Image 2](https://thefrontpage.dev/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnolanlawson.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2025%2F01%2Ffavicon.png%3Fw%3D32)    In his _Read the Tea…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users criticized the site&amp;#39;s newspaper-style layout for poor readability, specifically citing small font sizes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48272594&quot; title=&quot;Cool, but body font size is too small for comfortable reading!&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, long single-paragraph summaries &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273086&quot; title=&quot;Why is the text one long paragraph? Makes it very hard to read?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, and the use of justified text alignment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273224&quot; title=&quot;Using text-align: justify for questionable aesthetic purpose here really hurts readability, especially on a narrower viewport like the 1026px viewport of Safari with sidebar on an iPad Pro 12.9’’ (although it’s probably more of a problem of the four column layout on that specific narrow viewport; three should be better).&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. The creator explained that the single-paragraph format resulted from specific AI instructions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273120&quot; title=&quot;Because I&amp;#39;m telling the AI &amp;#39;summarize it to one paragraph&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, while others speculated the entire aesthetic was &amp;#34;vibe coded&amp;#34; by AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48274369&quot; title=&quot;I am almost certain this layout is generated by AI, because I vibe coded the exact same newspaper-like style weeks ago.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. To improve the experience, commenters suggested reducing the number of columns, enabling hyphenation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48272617&quot; title=&quot;I agree, but I think it&amp;#39;s that small because otherwise, the justified text results in ridiculous spacing. OP, consider reducing the number of columns from 4 to 3 (at least below very wide viewports), increasing the font size, and then also allowing hyphenation. I think the last will help a lot with the justification problem.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, or adding a left-alignment toggle &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48272857&quot; title=&quot;Or have a button that makes the text left-aligned for easier reading.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, though some argued such changes would defeat the project&amp;#39;s visual purpose &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48272908&quot; title=&quot;I think that very much defeats the point of making it look like a newspaper.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.blocksandfiles.com/flash/2026/05/22/norways-2-petabytes-of-huawei-flash-storage-and-llm-training/5244910&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Norway&amp;#39;s 2 petabytes of Huawei flash storage and LLM training&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blocksandfiles.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48270770&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;324 points · 215 comments · by rbanffy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Norway&amp;#39;s National Library is utilizing 2 petabytes of Huawei OceanStor Dorado flash storage to build a sovereign large language model trained on the country&amp;#39;s unique cultural heritage and digital archives. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.blocksandfiles.com/flash/2026/05/22/norways-2-petabytes-of-huawei-flash-storage-and-llm-training/5244910&quot; title=&quot;Norway’s 2 petabytes of Huawei flash storage and LLM training    Norway’s National Library is developing a large language model (LLM) that understands the Norwegian ...    [Jump to main content](#main)    Search    Topics    * [AI/ML](/tag/AI-ML)  * [Architecture](/tag/architecture)  * [Block](/tag/block)  * [Composable](/tag/composable)  * [Containers](/tag/containers)  * [Container storage](/tag/container-storage)  * [Data Management](/tag/data-management)  * [Data Protection](/tag/data-protection)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are largely skeptical of Norway’s &amp;#34;sovereign LLM&amp;#34; initiative, arguing that the hardware allocated is insufficient for training a full model and that the project may be a waste of resources &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271423&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The Olivia system is an HPE Cray Supercomputing EX system, with 448 GPUs and 64,512 CPU cores. Training a sovereign LLM with this meager hardware as opposed to a LORA on some open source model seems like a huge mistake and a potential red flag. There is no way these people have the resources to train a fully fledged LLM, so claiming that is their goal makes me think they don&amp;#39;t intend for the LLM to be useful. Which begs the question, whose money are they wasting - and why?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48274450&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Marius Husnes, the Head of IT Platform at the library (Nasjonlbiblioteket) discussed the project at Huawei’s ID Forum 2026 in Paris, saying that no commercial LLM provider was developing a local (Norwegian) language LLM. He asserted that any country with its own language that did not have a sovereign LLM trained in that language was at a disadvantage as a globally trained, English-speaking LLM would not know about that country’s history, news and culture that was described in the local…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users defend the need for local models due to the &amp;#34;anglo-centrism&amp;#34; and poor non-English research capabilities of current frontier models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273290&quot; title=&quot;I task GPT/Claude with researching stuff that pertains to very specific cultural or legal aspects in French politics, on a daily basis.  Even though French is a way more common language globally than Norwegian, these models still haven&amp;#39;t figured out that, no matter the language I myself speak to them (German or English depending on my mood) their web searches need to be done in French to return reasonable results. I have to remind them every time lest they come back with &amp;#39;uh, didn&amp;#39;t find…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest that creating and sharing a high-quality Norwegian dataset would be a more effective way to improve global LLM performance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48272746&quot; title=&quot;If you want LLMs to have knowledge of the Norwegian language, wouldn&amp;#39;t the most obvious thing to do be to build a good training dataset and make the dataset widely available? Why go to the expense of training your own model, especially when it will be inferior to state of the art models.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271744&quot; title=&quot;I wonder if instead (or in parallel), Norway should build a set of training data and share it (for free) with all the model builders. Seems like making the frontier models know Norwegian and their culture is a better (or additional!) way to reach the end they are going for here.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong consensus that existing transformers are already proficient at translation and cultural knowledge, making a dedicated sovereign model seem redundant or based on outdated assumptions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48272557&quot; title=&quot;How true is this statement:  &amp;#39;He asserted that any country with its own language that did not have a sovereign LLM trained in that language was at a disadvantage as a globally trained, English-speaking LLM would not know about that country’s history, news and culture that was described in the local language.&amp;#39; I thought all big players already train on basically everything remotely available to them no matter the language or quality, so his take sounds like an opinion formed in the early days of…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271440&quot; title=&quot;As a Norwegian this sounds like a mistake. Who will use this LLM? Where? For what? The underlying data could be made more easily searchable and digestible for agents in general if the goal is better knowledge of Norwegian culture.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271473&quot; title=&quot;Exactly, if there&amp;#39;s one thing transformers are good at it&amp;#39;s translation. One I&amp;#39;ve found particularly nice: any question ChatGPT can answer in English it can answer in French. I&amp;#39;m assuming Norwegian too. So there&amp;#39;s no point.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://unsung.aresluna.org/a-few-interesting-modern-pixel-fonts/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A few interesting modern pixel fonts&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (unsung.aresluna.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271448&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;416 points · 112 comments · by zdw&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This collection highlights modern pixel fonts that balance nostalgia with functionality, including Analog Mono&amp;#39;s improved descenders, Coral Pixels&amp;#39; subpixel-inspired coloring, Two Slice’s ultra-minimalist height, and Geist Pixel’s focus on professional typographic rigor for production environments. &lt;a href=&quot;https://unsung.aresluna.org/a-few-interesting-modern-pixel-fonts/&quot; title=&quot;Title: A few interesting modern pixel fonts – Unsung    URL Source: https://unsung.aresluna.org/a-few-interesting-modern-pixel-fonts/    Markdown Content:  Andrew Gleeson designed [Analog Mono](https://gleeson.itch.io/analog-mono), “fixing the crimes of VCR OSD Mono.” There used to be this classic pixel font that you’d see everywhere in the 1990s on hi-fi equipment: VCRs, TVs, camcorders, etc. One of its challenges was a low baseline which resulted in all the letters with descenders pulled up, for…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the aesthetic and technical evolution of pixel fonts, with users debating whether Vercel’s marketing copy for &amp;#34;Geist Pixel&amp;#34; was generated by an LLM or simply reflects modern corporate jargon &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48276362&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Geist Pixel isn’t a novelty font. It’s a system extension. Okay LLM&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48283539&quot; title=&quot;To be fair, that&amp;#39;s a direct quote from Vercel themselves introducing Geist Pixel: https://vercel.com/blog/introducing-geist-pixel&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48285452&quot; title=&quot;ya because Vercel generated the copy with an LLM&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48285518&quot; title=&quot;Some people wrote like that before LLMs polluted the water. Just like people used em dashes before LLMs. I used bullet points heavily before LLMs.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters highlighted the technical shift from the non-square aspect ratios of vintage displays to modern 1:1 &amp;#34;square pixels,&amp;#34; noting that historical fonts often look &amp;#34;off&amp;#34; on contemporary screens &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48288810&quot; title=&quot;A forgotten point is that modern pixel fonts all assume pixels have a 1:1 ratio: height the same as width, so an 8x8 character box is perfectly square. That&amp;#39;s NOT true for many of the old computer displays. Most had finer resolution in the horizontal compared to vertical lines, so more pixels across than in the same distance down. 1:1 &amp;#39;square pixels&amp;#39; was an innovation of the Macintosh, and very unusual for the time. So the fonts on this page displayed on other 80&amp;#39;s machines would not look…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users shared favorite niche examples like &amp;#34;Departure Mono&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;04b-03,&amp;#34; others questioned the legibility of ultra-tiny fonts and the practical utility of sub-pixel-inspired designs like &amp;#34;Coral Pixel&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48284661&quot; title=&quot;Analog Mono and Two Slice are really neat. If you like those, you&amp;#39;ll probably also like another of my favorite modern pixel fonts: Departure Mono. https://departuremono.com&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48285550&quot; title=&quot;Two Slice is smaller than other tiny pixel fonts I&amp;#39;ve seen. Maybe the smallest legible font? Depends on your definition of legibility I guess.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48284637&quot; title=&quot;Could somebody explain the Coral Pixel font? It makes no sense to me, given that the whole point of sub pixels was to look sharp without looking colorful. It only ever looked like that when you took a screenshot and then zoomed in, which seems extremely niche.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48283930&quot; title=&quot;as a lover of low resolution software, we must acknowledge the goat, never surpassed since 2003: https://www.dafont.com/04b-03.font nowadays all the alpha exists in making your software look like a cool fantasy tome: https://skeddles.itch.io/eldring-pro&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mullvad.net/en/help/exit-ip-vpn-servers-mitigation-rollout&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Exit IP VPN servers mitigation rollout&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mullvad.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48269580&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;422 points · 95 comments · by Cider9986&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mullvad VPN has begun rolling out a new mitigation to prevent exit IP fingerprinting across a specific list of global servers, including locations in the United States, Europe, and Australia. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mullvad.net/en/help/exit-ip-vpn-servers-mitigation-rollout&quot; title=&quot;Title: Exit IP VPN servers mitigation rollout    URL Source: https://mullvad.net/en/help/exit-ip-vpn-servers-mitigation-rollout    Markdown Content:  # Exit IP VPN servers mitigation rollout    [Skip to main content](https://mullvad.net/en/help/exit-ip-vpn-servers-mitigation-rollout#main)    [Not using Mullvad VPN The Dalles, United States Check for leaks](https://mullvad.net/en/check)    [](https://mullvad.net/en)    ## Products and services    *   [VPN](https://mullvad.net/en/vpn)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mullvad is rolling out mitigations for a vulnerability where unique exit IP addresses could be used to fingerprint and track users across different websites &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48270076&quot; title=&quot;it should probably link to this: https://mullvad.net/en/blog/exit-ip-fingerprinting-between-v... which is the blog post, rather than a list of exit servers related to this post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48143880&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48270810&quot; title=&quot;it is a direct response to this disclosure: https://tmctmt.com/posts/mullvad-exit-ips-as-a-fingerprintin... and nothing to do with american politics&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users debate whether this security focus was prompted by recent congressional warnings or a specific independent disclosure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48270745&quot; title=&quot;Is this at all related to Wyden&amp;#39;s recent congressional warning?  Are any other VPN providers speaking up on this? https://www.wyden.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/wyden_letter_to_g...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48270810&quot; title=&quot;it is a direct response to this disclosure: https://tmctmt.com/posts/mullvad-exit-ips-as-a-fingerprintin... and nothing to do with american politics&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271159&quot; title=&quot;And what evidence do you have that this May 14th disclosure has nothing to do with Wyden&amp;#39;s March warning?  If you remember your history you&amp;#39;ll know Wyden tried to shake the Snowden revelations out before the Snowden revelations. Dismissing Wyden&amp;#39;s remarks as &amp;#39;american politics&amp;#39; is near equivalent to dismissing the entire notion of VPN security. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/after-years-of-obscu...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others discussed technical implementation details, such as the proper use of reserved IP addresses in documentation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271506&quot; title=&quot;That blog post is a perfect example of when RFC5737 should be used. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5737/&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt; and the privacy trade-offs of using browser-based proxies versus system-wide VPNs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271485&quot; title=&quot;If you us Mullvad browser, which has built in Mullvad proxies, this isn&amp;#39;t an issue because it doesn&amp;#39;t use wireguard. The browser also has a cool feature in the browser extension called Random mode. This gives you a different IP for each site, improving your privacy.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48272498&quot; title=&quot;Which you absolutely shouldn&amp;#39;t use, because just like Tor Browser before, a vulnerability in the browser can be immediately escalated into decloaking your real IP. Ideally the proxying doesn&amp;#39;t even happen on the same machine.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, a side discussion emerged regarding the necessity of JavaScript for basic site functionality, with some users criticizing the reliance on scripts for icons and others dismissing such complaints as outdated &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271748&quot; title=&quot;On a side note, buttons icons on this page won&amp;#39;t load without javascript. I cannot comprehend what would justify such decision.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273164&quot; title=&quot;It’ll be a run-on effect of whatever framework they are using, and they very justifiably don’t want to bother catering to you.  Having JS disabled in 2026 and complaining about sites not behaving is simply a performative act.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ente.com/blog/how-shamirs-secret-sharing-works/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How Shamir&amp;#39;s Secret Sharing Works&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ente.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48272715&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;394 points · 83 comments · by subract&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Shamir&amp;#39;s Secret Sharing is a cryptographic algorithm that splits a secret into multiple parts using polynomial mathematics, ensuring that only a specific threshold of shares can reconstruct the original data while fewer shares reveal no information. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ente.com/blog/how-shamirs-secret-sharing-works/&quot; title=&quot;Title: How Shamir&amp;#39;s Secret Sharing Works    URL Source: https://ente.com/blog/how-shamirs-secret-sharing-works/    Published Time: 2026-05-25    Markdown Content:  Some secrets are too important to trust to one person, and too important to lose if that person disappears.    A company wants three officers present before the master key is used. A family wants account recovery to need more than one envelope. A team wants a backup that survives a missing member without handing anyone the whole thing.    Adi…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Shamir&amp;#39;s Secret Sharing is praised as a transformative technique for distributing keys without fully relinquishing control, with users suggesting it be taught in secondary schools as a practical application of polynomials &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48275433&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s an incredible technique, when I came across it, it just changed the way I thought of solving giving out keys without &amp;#39;truly&amp;#39; giving them out.  This gave me confidence for eternalvault.app, a project of mine.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273947&quot; title=&quot;This is such a cool technique, and you could even teach it in secondary schools as a neat thing computer scientists can do with polynomials.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Developers have utilized the scheme to create secure storage solutions that offer redundancy across cloud providers and &amp;#34;dead man&amp;#39;s switches&amp;#34; while avoiding the pitfalls of single master passwords &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48277051&quot; title=&quot;My masters thesis was on this! I created an app where you can store your data across all the common data storage providers (dropbox, google drive, onedrive, etc.) and used the secret sharing to aid with the encryption. The benefit was that: - They could no longer read your data - Additional redundancy (as you only need 2 to be available) - Compared to other secure storage apps which rely on a master password, which if you forget, you are screwed, you could still use all the usual account…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48278778&quot; title=&quot;I’ve been noodling over this exact business idea for a couple years!  Part of my value prop was to make ops scale down to as close to zero as possible by having the encrypted data and most of the front end for accessing it live in S3 objects (or some similar mega-cheap object store). Aside from that, all you need is the dead man’s switch mechanism. And the secret fragments would live on QR codes that bring you to the static SPA with one of the fragments already loaded up, prompting you to scan…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48283964&quot; title=&quot;Indeed, that&amp;#39;s precisely why I decided to ditch out of the subscription model and went into one time payment method, did the math and it made sense that I don&amp;#39;t need a very heavy system apart from supporting the dead man switch trigger Wrote my thoughts about that here: https://eternalvault.app/blog/why-we-are-adding-lifetime-pri... And it feels good to know that there are people out thinking about this, makes me happy truly and if you want to try out the platform, welcome aboard, happy to walk…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also touched on technical implementations, such as Ente&amp;#39;s open-source tool, and theoretical questions regarding optimal share sizes and the potential impact of quantum computing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48275526&quot; title=&quot;Bruce Schneier described this in his seminal book Applied Cryptography, and HashiCorp Vault used to have an implementation in Go. On the practical side, I always wondered how large - in bits - the shares should be. One answer I got on a news group was &amp;#39;1 bit more than the actual key length&amp;#39;. Nowadays, I wonder how the quantum computing threat would inform 1) share size choice and 2) pro/con Secret Sharing in general. Does anyone know?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273825&quot; title=&quot;Here is Ente&amp;#39;s implementation: ( https://2of3.ente.com/ )&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://seriot.ch/computation/jira.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Jira Is Turing-Complete&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (seriot.ch)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48263253&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;306 points · 149 comments · by vinhnx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By mapping Jira automation rules and issue counts to a Minsky register machine, researcher Nicolas Seriot has formally proven that the project-tracking tool is Turing-complete. &lt;a href=&quot;https://seriot.ch/computation/jira.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Jira IS Turing-Complete    URL Source: https://seriot.ch/computation/jira.html    Published Time: Mon, 25 May 2026 18:37:43 GMT    Markdown Content:  ### Nicolas Seriot    #### [Computation](https://seriot.ch/computation/index.html)&amp;gt; Jira is Turing-Complete    _Building a Minsky Machine in Atlassian Automation_    _22nd May 2026_    Engineering folklore [holds](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17689446) that [Jira](https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira) (Atlassian&amp;#39;s project-tracking tool) is…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Jira is theoretically a powerful tool for automation and &amp;#34;covering your ass&amp;#34; via detailed logging &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48263939&quot; title=&quot;Jira is popular and has good API wrappers for your favorite language. I&amp;#39;m surprised corporate programmers with the hacker spirit haven&amp;#39;t automated most of the things they are asked to do in Jira with Python command line scripts or whatever. If you can make Jira an order of magnitude easier to use for yourself than for the people pushing it, suddenly the script flips and Jira is something you push to protect yourself. I&amp;#39;ve used Jira to almost a malicious extent at times, and it&amp;#39;s a great tool to…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48263849&quot; title=&quot;All workflow and orchestration engines are Turing complete, the whole purpose is to automate execution flows.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, users report that automating it is a &amp;#34;fractal shit snowflake&amp;#34; of undocumented magic constants and inconsistent custom fields &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48263975&quot; title=&quot;Quite a few have, the issue is that every Jira instance is a fractal shit snowflake of custom properties several layers deep through old failed migrations to new organization strategies. And many times the API can do stuff that the UI doesn&amp;#39;t allow, and everyone&amp;#39;s relying on the UI to drive things, so you end up in weirdly broken corners because you didn&amp;#39;t notice that you need custom_field_5537 to be paired with custom_field_442 or it doesn&amp;#39;t appear on anyone else&amp;#39;s dashboard.  Also it claims…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a consensus that the UI has degraded into a &amp;#34;thousand papercuts&amp;#34; of over-engineered features, though some argue this mess is merely a projection of a dysfunctional organization&amp;#39;s own failures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48264076&quot; title=&quot;I came back to a workplace, that still used JIRA. Obviously during the interview I was like oh JIRA yeah yeah yeah you still use that? I can use that. Anyway yes, I can use JIRA. But it was a real shock to see the latest version of JIRA. It has a thousand papercuts, one of the worst is double clicking on text select stuff suddenly kicks fields into editor mode. What I was remembering was JIRA Server 4.0, you can walk down memory lane here* - zoom in enough and you&amp;#39;ll see each issue has a title,…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48263854&quot; title=&quot;Jira is completely awful and thus has the potential to take on any other form of awfulness.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48265235&quot; title=&quot;A dysfunctional organization will project its failures to everything it touches. I personally have not seen such mess, likely because working in regulated industries means there‘s usually some SOP or work instruction that is regularly updated, so the setup is driven by the compliance process. Nowadays, I opt in for Atlassian because it works fine out of the box, I avoid heavy customization (which would mean tool lock-in), and Claude can move the tickets itself anyway - no scripting required.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the frustration, many developers still find it worth scripting to bypass the UI, though others now opt for using AI agents to handle ticket management directly &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48263939&quot; title=&quot;Jira is popular and has good API wrappers for your favorite language. I&amp;#39;m surprised corporate programmers with the hacker spirit haven&amp;#39;t automated most of the things they are asked to do in Jira with Python command line scripts or whatever. If you can make Jira an order of magnitude easier to use for yourself than for the people pushing it, suddenly the script flips and Jira is something you push to protect yourself. I&amp;#39;ve used Jira to almost a malicious extent at times, and it&amp;#39;s a great tool to…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48263975&quot; title=&quot;Quite a few have, the issue is that every Jira instance is a fractal shit snowflake of custom properties several layers deep through old failed migrations to new organization strategies. And many times the API can do stuff that the UI doesn&amp;#39;t allow, and everyone&amp;#39;s relying on the UI to drive things, so you end up in weirdly broken corners because you didn&amp;#39;t notice that you need custom_field_5537 to be paired with custom_field_442 or it doesn&amp;#39;t appear on anyone else&amp;#39;s dashboard.  Also it claims…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48265235&quot; title=&quot;A dysfunctional organization will project its failures to everything it touches. I personally have not seen such mess, likely because working in regulated industries means there‘s usually some SOP or work instruction that is regularly updated, so the setup is driven by the compliance process. Nowadays, I opt in for Atlassian because it works fine out of the box, I avoid heavy customization (which would mean tool lock-in), and Claude can move the tickets itself anyway - no scripting required.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://religionnews.com/2026/05/25/in-his-first-encyclical-pope-leo-xiv-says-ai-must-serve-humanity-not-the-powerful-few/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Pope Leo XIV says AI must serve humanity, not the powerful few&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (religionnews.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266485&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;345 points · 67 comments · by benwerd&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In his first encyclical, Pope Leo XIV called for the &amp;#34;disarming&amp;#34; of artificial intelligence, urging global leaders to implement strict regulations that ensure the technology serves the common good rather than the interests of military powers and a few dominant Big Tech companies. &lt;a href=&quot;https://religionnews.com/2026/05/25/in-his-first-encyclical-pope-leo-xiv-says-ai-must-serve-humanity-not-the-powerful-few/&quot; title=&quot;Title: In his first encyclical, Pope Leo XIV says AI must serve humanity, not the powerful few    URL Source: https://religionnews.com/2026/05/25/in-his-first-encyclical-pope-leo-xiv-says-ai-must-serve-humanity-not-the-powerful-few/    Published Time: 2026-05-25T05:29:28-04:00    Markdown Content:  VATICAN CITY (RNS) — Pope Leo XIV took direct aim at the power of Big Tech in his first encyclical on Monday (May 25), warning that artificial intelligence risks widening inequality, weakening democracy and…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion quickly shifts from the Pope’s stance on AI to a debate over political figures and the relevance of religious authority in modern discourse &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266776&quot; title=&quot;Presidents through out American history has believed various forms of genocide and slavery were applicable practices to modern problems; hell the current president thinks variously incredulous things. So you know, you might want to adjust your measuring stick before you critique people.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48267769&quot; title=&quot;An HN user time-transported in from 15 years ago would find it incomprehensible that there there are only two sceptical responses (both flag killed) on a post about a message from the supreme leader of a nearly 1.5 billion strong religion. Times have truly changed.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266875&quot; title=&quot;Not every conversation is about Trump, is it possible to stop this?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that the Pope’s message offers a &amp;#34;common sense&amp;#34; alternative to current political leadership &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48267800&quot; title=&quot;Times have changed in a lot of dimensions.  To name 2:  1)  we have an AI thing now, and 2)  the pope is American and more trustworthy than all of our current top politicians of both parties. It&amp;#39;s not like people are longing for times of papal authority, they&amp;#39;re just looking for anyone at all with common sense.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others dismiss the religious context entirely or pivot to criticisms of past and present American presidents &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266776&quot; title=&quot;Presidents through out American history has believed various forms of genocide and slavery were applicable practices to modern problems; hell the current president thinks variously incredulous things. So you know, you might want to adjust your measuring stick before you critique people.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48267058&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Do you disagree with the Pope? Yes I do.  I don&amp;#39;t think you a prayer can literally transform wine into blood.  How about you?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266938&quot; title=&quot;Both things can be true at the same time, so shutting down the critique (possibly because it is critiquing something you like??) just because another critique can be made is not a good counter argument&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a notable meta-commentary on how Hacker News has changed, with users observing a shift in how the community reacts to religious leaders compared to fifteen years ago &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48267769&quot; title=&quot;An HN user time-transported in from 15 years ago would find it incomprehensible that there there are only two sceptical responses (both flag killed) on a post about a message from the supreme leader of a nearly 1.5 billion strong religion. Times have truly changed.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.referenceforbusiness.com/biography/S-Z/Suzuki-Toshifumi-1932.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Toshifumi Suzuki, founder of Seven-Eleven Japan, has died&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (referenceforbusiness.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48268609&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;266 points · 115 comments · by L_Rahman&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Toshifumi Suzuki, the visionary founder of Seven-Eleven Japan and former head of the Ito-Yokado Group, revolutionized Japanese retail by introducing franchising and advanced data systems before eventually acquiring and revitalizing the brand&amp;#39;s American parent company. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.referenceforbusiness.com/biography/S-Z/Suzuki-Toshifumi-1932.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Toshifumi Suzuki 1932— Biography - Lessons from abroad    URL Source: https://www.referenceforbusiness.com/biography/S-Z/Suzuki-Toshifumi-1932.html    Markdown Content:  * * *    Discover more    E-commerce    Food &amp;amp; Grocery Retailers    E-Commerce Services    * * *    **Chairman and chief executive officer, Ito-Yokado Group and its subsidiary, Seven-Eleven Japan Company**    Nationality: Japanese.    Food &amp;amp; Grocery Retailers    Born: December 1, 1932, in Nagano prefecture, Japan.    Education: [Chuo…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters celebrate Toshifumi Suzuki’s legacy by highlighting the high quality of food, service, and convenience offered by 7-Eleven in Japan, which serves as a safe community hub for all ages &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271144&quot; title=&quot;I ate a lot 7/11 onigiri as a poor grad student exploring Tokyo on a long layover once... they&amp;#39;re truly wonderful little stores. (They also are one of the few places you can use an ATM, very useful given how cash based Japan is) He can be proud of the legacy he built, which is something many American founders cannot say with a straight face. Rest in power sir.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271092&quot; title=&quot;On our last couple of Japan trips, we would walk into 7/11s for an inexpensive coffee, an egg or fruit sandwich, and also do some treasure-hunting for co-branded items with Muji/Uniqlo or others. It became a short and meaningful part of our routine. We loved the convenient locations and fantastic service at all their stores. Well done, Suzuki-san!&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271662&quot; title=&quot;The local stores in Japan and Taiwan are really nice. 7/11 and Family Mart are these pleasant places where you can see schoolchildren sitting chatting and eating. That’s not something you’d see in San Francisco. You’ll see adults with children sometimes at Whole Foods, which is nice, but unattended children not so much.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273413&quot; title=&quot;I’ve seen little children take the subway alone in Japan. Its a completely different environment&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate whether the Japanese model can be replicated in the U.S. due to supply chain differences and food waste challenges &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271174&quot; title=&quot;I wonder how 7/11 in the US will change now that the Japanese version bought out the US version. Will we actually have hot and prepared food like Japan? I doubt it, seems the supply chain infrastructure just isn&amp;#39;t there.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271646&quot; title=&quot;The waste generated is also a major challenge.  Having fresh food always ready means trashing a lot of meals.  In the US there are networks of food banks and such, but it can still be difficult to keep up with the flow of unpurchased food that is no longer fresh.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271730&quot; title=&quot;How is this waste dealt with in Japan?  Why can&amp;#39;t whatever-that-is be implemented in the US?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others note that Japan&amp;#39;s once cash-heavy economy has rapidly modernized with electronic payments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271754&quot; title=&quot;This is a bit out of date. These days basically any ATM allows foreign cards, just in time for Japan to finally switch to electronic payments in a big way (in particular PayPay).&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48271902&quot; title=&quot;Yes. The payments landscape has shifted pretty dramatically in Japan over just the past 3 years. It used to be that you had to worry about getting cash, IC cards, refilling said IC cards, going to an actual bank with your passport, etc. Now all you need is an iPhone (although I hear Android phones from outside Japan still can&amp;#39;t use suica).&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the praise, some point out that the stores are relatively expensive by local standards and that visitors currently benefit from a favorable exchange rate &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273352&quot; title=&quot;They are expensive by Japanese standards. Assuming you&amp;#39;re American, you&amp;#39;re benefitting massively from the exchange rate.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://krebsonsecurity.com/2026/05/netherlands-seizes-800-servers-arrests-2-for-aiding-cyberattacks/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Netherlands Seizes 800 Servers, Arrests 2 for Aiding Cyberattacks&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (krebsonsecurity.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48266906&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;287 points · 89 comments · by jruohonen&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dutch authorities arrested the co-owners of hosting firms MIRhosting and WorkTitans and seized over 800 servers for allegedly violating sanctions by providing infrastructure used by Russia for cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and influencing European elections. &lt;a href=&quot;https://krebsonsecurity.com/2026/05/netherlands-seizes-800-servers-arrests-2-for-aiding-cyberattacks/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Netherlands Seizes 800 Servers, Arrests 2 for Aiding Cyberattacks    URL Source: https://krebsonsecurity.com/2026/05/netherlands-seizes-800-servers-arrests-2-for-aiding-cyberattacks/    Published Time: Tue, 26 May 2026 05:51:38 GMT    Markdown Content:  Authorities in the Netherlands have arrested the co-owners of two related Internet hosting companies for operating IT infrastructure used by Russia to carry out cyberattacks, influence operations and disinformation campaigns inside the European…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters express amazement at the high level of engineering and planning required to maintain criminal infrastructure, noting that these individuals possess the skills to succeed in legitimate tech roles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48268150&quot; title=&quot;I’ve been on the defender side of security my whole career. I know in some markets crime pays more than legitimate work, but it never ceases to amaze me how much thought, effort, planning, and engineering goes into providing infrastructure IT services for cybercriminals.  The people involved definitely have the skills to be profitable at legitimate work; it just puzzles me that they choose to support criminals.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some attribute the choice of crime to the thrill of intellectual superiority and evading the law &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48268322&quot; title=&quot;I watched the downfall and eventual jailing of someone who had a great job, career, and family after he started getting involved in cybercrime. As far as I can make sense of it, he enjoyed the thrill of feeling superior to others: Evading the law, exploiting people who viewed as stupid, and enriching himself in the process. He got caught through a mistake that was really dumb in retrospect. I think he believed his intellectual superiority combined with the stupidity of others so much that…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48268835&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;As far as I can make sense of it, he enjoyed the thrill of feeling superior to others: Evading the law, exploiting people who viewed as stupid, and enriching himself in the process. I sadly see this pattern of thinking far more often than I want to in my fellow eastern Europeans.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others point to economic disparities, noting that tech salaries in regions like Eastern Europe are often a fraction of those in the US &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48268696&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not easy to go legit, especially in today&amp;#39;s job market, depending on where you live in the world also. The US is unique with its high salaries for tech work (on the lower end of those of high salaries is pure ops work like this though). If you&amp;#39;re in a country where the average sysadmin salary is substantially lower (to pick on Eastern Europe for a minute, you&amp;#39;re looking at the equivalent of ~$30-35k USD/year), it&amp;#39;s not hard to see why its tempting to go the cybercrime route.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also features a debate over whether these hosting providers are front companies for intelligence agencies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48269244&quot; title=&quot;We should note these are not even slightly legitimate hosting companies, lest anyone worry too much about their non-KYC offshore servers. These aren&amp;#39;t hosting companies that ask little, they are just directly front companies for Russian intelligence, owned by members of Russian intelligence, they don&amp;#39;t do anything else, they don&amp;#39;t provide hosting service to regular people even if you want it (I have tried). Unlike in Germany where I lost several social media accounts because my email service…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48269477&quot; title=&quot;Any source to back up your claims? Otherwise it seemed pretty much a conspiracy theory to me.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt; and a disagreement regarding the fairness of using regional stereotypes to explain criminal behavior &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48269055&quot; title=&quot;Let&amp;#39;s not generalize, even if you feel like you can say that because you&amp;#39;re a member of a group you&amp;#39;re generalizing. It&amp;#39;s unfair to most of the people in any group being generalized.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48269506&quot; title=&quot;Stereotypes exist for a reason.  It&amp;#39;s exhausting having to address this concern trolling every single time they&amp;#39;re mentioned.  Nobody thinks everyone in the group conforms to the stereotype.  And they certainly don&amp;#39;t need your white knighting.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48269640&quot; title=&quot;It isn&amp;#39;t &amp;#39;concern trolling&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;white knighting&amp;#39; to call out racism or bigotry, and expect some decency in the discussion. If it is &amp;#39;exhausting&amp;#39; for you to be propagating unfair stereotypes, perhaps stop your bad behavior?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-24</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-24</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://esengine.github.io/DeepSeek-Reasonix/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;DeepSeek reasonix, DeepSeek native coding agent with high caching and low cost&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (esengine.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48256953&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;510 points · 214 comments · by Alifatisk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DeepSeek has introduced Reasonix, a native coding agent designed to provide high-performance reasoning with optimized caching and low operational costs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://esengine.github.io/DeepSeek-Reasonix/&quot; title=&quot;Related ongoing thread:&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;DeepSeek makes the V4 Pro price discount permanent&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=48237663&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=48237663&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt; - May 2026 (384 comments)&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are debating the necessity of a dedicated DeepSeek coding agent, with some arguing that existing tools like OpenCode or custom API bridges already achieve high cache hit rates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257509&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not sure you need a &amp;#39;DeepSeek native coding agent&amp;#39; to take advantage of DeepSeeks cache, yesterday as the Codex quota usage issue still wasn&amp;#39;t solved for me, I wrote a tiny little bridge so I could use DeepSeek V4 Pro via Codex, and seems most of everything I did was basically cached as far as I can tell: https://i.imgur.com/7eKn6wN.png (2026-05-23 Input (Cache hit): 39,123,200 tokens, Input (Cache miss) 1,692,286), and the bridge is doing not special, just massage the DeepSeek API shape…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257543&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I wrote a tiny little bridge so I could use DeepSeek V4 Pro via Codex Can you share the bridge.  DeepSeek v4 is awesome paired with claude-code or opencode. I found that claude code costs me less than opencode and I am presuming this is due to a better engineered harness.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While DeepSeek is praised for its cost efficiency and caching focus &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257687&quot; title=&quot;I love the focus on cache hit efficiency. Hats off to the deekseek team for creating a great product that maximizes cost efficiency for the user.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, some users report stability issues with current third-party harnesses &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257912&quot; title=&quot;Opencode has really bad cache stability issues that they seem uninterested in fixing at the moment.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt; or express a desire for more lightweight, self-sustained binaries &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260508&quot; title=&quot;If only author would understand, that some people want single, self sustained binary that doesnt take half of computer memory and would rather write it in rust or golang.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant security concerns persist regarding the potential for state-mandated backdoors in Chinese-developed software &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257992&quot; title=&quot;I’m feeling more a novice every day, but how isn’t this just handing over your code to team deepseek for whatever they might want&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258724&quot; title=&quot;there&amp;#39;s laws on the books in China that says that every company operating in China must aid and abet the Chinese government in espionage against the rest of the world.  given those facts, I find it deeply troubling to be using anything coming out of China, especially a program that runs in the context of a Linux terminal on a machine that might have something important on it. I&amp;#39;d argue it&amp;#39;s a back door waiting to happen, if not sooner than obviously later.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, even as users seek alternatives to increasingly restrictive Western models like Claude &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258118&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s pretty funny, i&amp;#39;m a $200/m Claude subscriber and i&amp;#39;ve had little need to use anything else. However the more Claude has been restricting my workflow (notably around the recent IDE/-p usage change) the more i&amp;#39;ve been wanting to go elsehwere. I&amp;#39;m concerned since i really want SOTA reasoning, but DeepSeek still has me interested.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://epoch.ai/data-insights/ai-chip-component-cost-shares&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Memory has grown to nearly two-thirds of AI chip component costs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (epoch.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258684&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;356 points · 367 comments · by intelkishan&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;High-bandwidth memory (HBM) spending rose from 52% to 63% of total AI chip component costs between early 2024 and late 2025, driven by tight supply and rising prices that are significantly increasing capital expenditure for major tech companies. &lt;a href=&quot;https://epoch.ai/data-insights/ai-chip-component-cost-shares&quot; title=&quot;Title: AI Chip Component Costs: Memory at 63% | Epoch AI    URL Source: https://epoch.ai/data-insights/ai-chip-component-cost-shares    Markdown Content:  # AI Chip Component Costs: Memory at 63% | Epoch AI | Epoch AI    ![Image 2: Menu](https://epoch.ai/assets/icons/nav-hamburger.svg)![Image 3: Menu](https://epoch.ai/assets/icons/x-lg.svg) [![Image 4: Epoch AI logo](https://epoch.ai/assets/logo/logo.svg)](https://epoch.ai/)    - [x]     [Latest](https://epoch.ai/latest)    Topics    #### AI Progress    *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The high cost of memory presents a potential path to a 3x reduction in AI hardware costs if supply eventually meets demand &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48259811&quot; title=&quot;An interesting implication of this is that AI inference and training has a path to a ~3x hardware cost reduction (and maybe ~2x total cost reduction) without any technical innovation whatsoever, we just need to wait for dram supply to meet demand (either by manufacturing scaling or just waiting for the current rate of manufacturing to fill the demand spike).&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, though users disagree on whether manufacturers will intentionally maintain under-supply to protect profit margins &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260231&quot; title=&quot;The memory makers will not expand demand drastically. It is in the nature of their business to keep the market under-supplied, otherwise the following oversupply will kill them. Instead, supply is just rerouted from less profitable segments such as mobile and personal computing.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48259184&quot; title=&quot;Here’s the thing, what if memory manufacturers take this opportunity to collude and basically never reduce the price of memory below the current levels since it’s too hard for a new competitor to just rise up and undercut them? Everything I hear about is how hard and risky it is to spin up a new fab. And by doing this, they ensure local LLMs never become feasible for the vast majority of people and AI companies solidify subscriptions forever.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some anticipate that Chinese production will eventually flood the market with cheaper alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260356&quot; title=&quot;China is about to flood the market and prove this notion wrong. If there is demand they want to meet it with supply. But to your point, that is exactly how American companies like to play now. No one is stopping them from screwing over the consumer. I have a Micron near me and they are building another chip facility but we are years away still so I suspect China will beat them to the punch.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260405&quot; title=&quot;I suspect Chinese factories will get built first, but quality may take a few years to really nail down. Basically: China floods the market with cheaper but less QA&amp;#39;d parts, makes a gazillion dollars, is able to spend said money to fix yields / QA issues and streamline operations, by the time that happens Micron and maybe a few other existing players will have new memory production, and then we&amp;#39;ll have a flood of cheap, reliable memory. 4yr, maybe?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others note that current scarcity has already caused consumer RAM prices to quadruple in recent years &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48259136&quot; title=&quot;I bought 96GB of RAM a couple of years ago for ~$250.  That same RAM now costs $1200!&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. This trend is creating a hostile environment for gamers and PC hobbyists, as high-end GPUs and memory components become increasingly unaffordable compared to historical norms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48259181&quot; title=&quot;Awful time for gamers and PC hobbyists not fully into AI.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48259445&quot; title=&quot;I really don’t want to give anyone ideas, but doesn’t this make the Nvidia 5090 an unbelievably good deal right now? The VRAM in the 5090 is only made by one country in the world. The 50xx series is special, because its ram is so dependent on a single commodity. It’s not like a 4090 or a 3090; their VRAM chips have been around for years. If there’s a shortage or interruption in DDR7 VRAM, it seems like every GPU that requires it would explode in value. I hope I don’t regret posting this because…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48259552&quot; title=&quot;This is 100% going to kill the home built pc market. When I started building gaming pcs, the top top card was 750$ (NZD). Now they’re 10,000 just for the gpu and another 1-2000 for ram. People used to get into gaming pcs as an affordable hobby, now it’s making general aviation look like plan B.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/04/microsoft-open-sources-the-earliest-dos-source-code-discovered-to-date/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft open-sources “the earliest DOS source code discovered to date”&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (arstechnica.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48253386&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;456 points · 156 comments · by DamnInteresting&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft has open-sourced the earliest known source code for MS-DOS, providing a historical look at the operating system&amp;#39;s initial development. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/04/microsoft-open-sources-the-earliest-dos-source-code-discovered-to-date/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;opensource.microsoft.com&amp;amp;#x2F;blog&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;04&amp;amp;#x2F;28&amp;amp;#x2F;continuing-the-story-of-early-dos-development&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;opensource.microsoft.com&amp;amp;#x2F;blog&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;04&amp;amp;#x2F;28&amp;amp;#x2F;continuing-...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of the earliest DOS source code highlights a preservation feat by the &amp;#34;DOS Disassembly Group,&amp;#34; who had to manually transcribe and OCR the code from aging paper printouts because no digital copies survived &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48253861&quot; title=&quot;wow, they had to OCR it back in from paper printouts &amp;gt; This source code is old enough that it hadn’t been stored digitally. “A dedicated team of historians and preservationists led by Yufeng Gao and Rich Cini,” calling itself the “DOS Disassembly Group,” painstakingly transcribed and scanned in code from paper printouts provided by Paterson. This process was made even more difficult because modern OCR software struggled with the quality of the decades-old printout.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48253895&quot; title=&quot;Yet another case where text printed on paper outlived any digital storage.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users expressed nostalgia for an era when a few thousand lines of assembly could launch a giant like Microsoft, others noted that Microsoft actually purchased DOS rather than writing it, citing the Altair BASIC interpreter as their true technical breakthrough &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48255953&quot; title=&quot;I cannot describe to you how jealous I am of the fact that back then writing a few thousand lines of assembly was what it took to launch a successful software company.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48256288&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; writing a few thousand lines of assembly was what it took to launch a successful software company. Yes, but that assembly was not DOS, and it wasn’t easy. Microsoft purchased the DOS code, they didn’t write it. Of course, they did develop and modify DOS. But that was a clever (and lucky) business deal, not a technological accomplishment. The real beginning of Microsoft was earlier, with Allen, Gates and Davidoff writing the Altair BASIC interpreter. That was a serious achievement. They had…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also touched on the &amp;#34;founding crimes&amp;#34; of tech giants, debating whether Microsoft’s success stemmed from unauthorized use of university hardware or the immense social and financial capital of Bill Gates’ family &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257907&quot; title=&quot;Imagine if the University had sued for their share of the IP and that was created using their resources… It’s funny because I thought Jobs/Wozinak got their initial funding from selling phreaking boxes.  And more recently, Anthropic engaged in criminal copyright violations with only a slap on the wrist. Feels like a common theme of every “great” company having its origins from a “boost” resulting from criminal activity.  (After all, that’s where the money is!) Just imagine the criminal…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48259540&quot; title=&quot;In the case of Microsoft, I&amp;#39;m not seeing it. Being born into a 1% household and understanding the asymmetric upside that having the money and the time to speculate is far more significant than the civil and criminal legal violations on the way. The most common way to go from one-percenter rich to .001% rich is to already have enough wealthy people generating capital in your personal network that you can raise capital on sweetheart terms to buy the labor of people who don&amp;#39;t. Then you sell it at…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://adaptivesupport.amd.com/s/question/0D5Pd00001YQLdMKAX/why-is-vivado-20261-dropping-linux-support-for-free-tier-?language=en_US&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why is Vivado 2026.1 dropping Linux support for free tier?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (adaptivesupport.amd.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48254309&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;312 points · 188 comments · by zdw&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The provided source does not contain the story content as the page failed to load due to a CSS error. &lt;a href=&quot;https://adaptivesupport.amd.com/s/question/0D5Pd00001YQLdMKAX/why-is-vivado-20261-dropping-linux-support-for-free-tier-?language=en_US&quot; title=&quot;Title: AMD Customer Community    URL Source: https://adaptivesupport.amd.com/s/question/0D5Pd00001YQLdMKAX/why-is-vivado-20261-dropping-linux-support-for-free-tier-?language=en_US    Published Time: Sun, 25 May 2025 06:00:10 GMT    Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.  Warning: This page maybe requiring CAPTCHA, please make sure you are authorized to access this page.    Markdown Content:  # AMD Customer…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AMD&amp;#39;s decision to remove Linux support from Vivado&amp;#39;s free tier has sparked backlash, with users arguing it alienates students and hobbyists while effectively acting as a masked price hike for small businesses &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48254544&quot; title=&quot;The official replies are addressing questions that nobody has asked. The main issue is why Linux support is being removed from the Basic tier while Windows is still allowed. To grow the ecosystem, AMD needs more people working on their hardware. Restricting Linux will only alienates students, hobbyists, and devs who want to adopt AMD tech. - From long term AMD user&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48255680&quot; title=&quot;Some people, including the management of most big corporations, claim that verbal insults, which do no actual physical harm to anyone, are &amp;#39;unacceptable abusive behavior&amp;#39;, while the actions that do physical harm to others, e.g. by tricking or forcing them to pay an extra part of their hard-earned money for things that should not have been paid, because they had already been paid in another form, instead of using that money for worthy purposes, are not &amp;#39;unacceptable abusive behavior&amp;#39;. Obviously,…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48254918&quot; title=&quot;I’m working in education and will change to other vendors in the near future. That means all my students will do so as well. Windows cannot provide feature parity for workloads that require cross compiling, AMD could at least support RHEL like the old days.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics contend that AMD&amp;#39;s official response focused on policing &amp;#34;abusive&amp;#34; language like the word &amp;#34;disgraceful&amp;#34; to deflect from the actual policy change, though some defend the right of representatives to enforce forum decorum &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48255615&quot; title=&quot;The official replies started off by addressing ... the &amp;#39;unacceptable abusive behavior towards AMD&amp;#39;. The most important thing here is obviously to ask people not to use such hurtful words as &amp;#39;disgraceful&amp;#39; towards poor little AMD... Answering the actual question seems not a high priority&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48256116&quot; title=&quot;Yes, this struck me as rather odd and unprofessional too.  Do you really want to depend on a company where customer facing representatives can’t handle people being upset?  Especially when to company has just announced changes that limit what users can do with their products. The older I get the less I want to deal with companies that act like primadonnas and the technologies they make.  This is also why I don’t do phone apps: your market access is 100% controlled by two companies that can wipe…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257259&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Yes, this struck me as rather odd and unprofessional too. Do you really want to depend on a company where customer facing representatives can’t handle people being upset? I’m actually fully in favor of empowering customer-facing representatives to put reasonable limits on responding to customer abuse. It should not be the job of a forum moderator to take abuse. Warning them about the rules of the forum and then enforcing the rules is forum management 101. It’s getting silly that people are…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257537&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I’m actually fully in favor of empowering customer-facing representatives to put reasonable limits on responding to customer abuse. That&amp;#39;s not the question that was asked. Neither calling a company&amp;#39;s actions disgraceful nor anything else in the posts that triggered that official reply were abusive to customer service.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest this is an opportunity for the Linux community to fund its own tools, others point out that open-source development is impossible because AMD refuses to document the necessary hardware bitstream details &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48255412&quot; title=&quot;On the other hand - this is now an opportunity for Linux community to show that they are actually able to fund development of software for their platform, right? Many HNers promised to pay if developers bring their software to Linux - will that actually happen?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48255447&quot; title=&quot;What you say is ridiculous. The only reason why the &amp;#39;Linux community&amp;#39; cannot create adequate FPGA design tools is that the vendors like AMD refuse to document the necessary details of their products. A few old AMD FPGAs have been reversed engineered, e.g. some ARTIX-7, so for them there is no need for the rather bad AMD tools, but for most AMD formerly Xilinx FPGAs it is impossible to create better tools for lack of documentation. As long as AMD refuses to provide the technical documentation…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://scienceaim.com/australia-just-proved-the-four-day-work-week-works-here-is-what-the-data-actually-says/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The four-day workweek in Australia: insights from early adopters of 100:80:100&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (scienceaim.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48259990&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;239 points · 216 comments · by randycupertino&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A study of 15 Australian companies trialing a four-day workweek found that 14 permanently adopted the model after reporting no loss in productivity and reduced employee burnout. Under the &amp;#34;100:80:100&amp;#34; model, staff maintained full pay and output while working 80% of their previous hours through restructured workflows. &lt;a href=&quot;https://scienceaim.com/australia-just-proved-the-four-day-work-week-works-here-is-what-the-data-actually-says/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Australia Just Proved the Four-Day Work Week Works. Here Is What the Data Actually Says.    URL Source: https://scienceaim.com/australia-just-proved-the-four-day-work-week-works-here-is-what-the-data-actually-says/    Published Time: 2026-05-24T06:59:22+00:00    Markdown Content:  A new study published in [Nature’s Humanities and Social Sciences Communications journal](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-026-07536-x) has confirmed what many workers have quietly hoped for: **companies can…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the moral and economic arguments for a four-day workweek, with proponents arguing that exponential productivity gains from technology should be used to reduce labor hours rather than increase corporate profit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260918&quot; title=&quot;Speaking as an American, I don’t give a shit if it increases productivity or not. Productivity has gone up exponentially with technological advancement since the advent of the 5 day work week. We, as a species, should be minimizing work to 3 or 4 days a week with equal overall pay. Corporations should be fined heavily for contacting an employee after working hours. On call should require corporations to pay hefty overtime. This is a compromise because really and truly corporations should be…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260683&quot; title=&quot;Basically every study shows a four day week works best. The issue is why we never go with what the study shows.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics and skeptics point to Australia’s current productivity lows and high tax environment as reasons for caution, warning that such mandates could lead to increased offshoring or higher consumer prices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260849&quot; title=&quot;Australia also has a 60 year productivity low and a government that is boosting taxes on capital gains on shares/business to basically a worldwide high. So take our experiments with a grain of salt!&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260967&quot; title=&quot;That would be ok in a non-globalized world. In our world, any country that implements those laws will see a lot more offshoring.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48261445&quot; title=&quot;People should realise that they will be the ones paying for it. Prices will increase a lot. People need to be aware of that. Personally I&amp;#39;m okay with that trade-off. Also corporations - when checks and balances work properly, which is frequently not the case unfortunately - are great and net benefit for humanity.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users advocate for a transition to employee-owned co-ops to bypass corporate structures, others argue that if these models were truly superior, they would have already dominated the market naturally &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260918&quot; title=&quot;Speaking as an American, I don’t give a shit if it increases productivity or not. Productivity has gone up exponentially with technological advancement since the advent of the 5 day work week. We, as a species, should be minimizing work to 3 or 4 days a week with equal overall pay. Corporations should be fined heavily for contacting an employee after working hours. On call should require corporations to pay hefty overtime. This is a compromise because really and truly corporations should be…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48261669&quot; title=&quot;Lot of shoulds, oughts, etc. How about this: do whatever you want. Nothing is stopping you from setting up a 3 day workweek co-op. More power to any group that wants to. There are a number out there already. But it&amp;#39;s worth considering why it hasn&amp;#39;t totally taken over &amp;#39;naturally&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.adventuresinoss.com/aws-four-years/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Amazon Web Services – Four Years and Out&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (adventuresinoss.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48254475&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;311 points · 130 comments · by RyeCombinator&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An AWS open-source liaison describes his relief at being fired after four years, citing a shift in company culture that prioritizes rapid Generative AI development over customer needs and human connection, while increasingly viewing employees as &amp;#34;fungible&amp;#34; assets. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.adventuresinoss.com/aws-four-years/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Amazon Web Services - Four Years and Out    URL Source: https://www.adventuresinoss.com/aws-four-years/    Published Time: 2026-05-23T10:55:00-04:00    Markdown Content:  Today marks four years since I joined AWS. My last day will be Friday.    I have to say being fired from AWS is actually a relief. There have been a lot of changes to the company since I joined in 2022, and the company I wanted to work for is no longer the same company.    This past year, while I was doing my best to make AWS play…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters report a significant decline in AWS support quality, citing long delays, unhelpful first-line staff, and the frustrating use of unvalidated, AI-generated responses that often provide incorrect information &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48255272&quot; title=&quot;Over the last month I contacted Support for the first time in many years. This was for a question about how billing works. It went like this; 1. Case created. 2. Unassigned for seven days. 3. Open real-time chat, talk for 25 or so minutes where I guide a first-line Indian chap who plainly doesn&amp;#39;t know about the subject in hand and who is as we talk reading the AWS docs I&amp;#39;ve already read.  At the end, just as I couldn&amp;#39;t find an answer, he couldn&amp;#39;t - which is good, he didn&amp;#39;t try to give me the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48255835&quot; title=&quot;AI &amp;#39;support&amp;#39; bots that just attempt to read the published documentation for you are possibly the most annoying thing to have come out of the current AI plague. Even Stripe - once legendary for the quality of its support - has apparently given up now. I had to deal with it recently over a case where the merchant was seeing an unexpected change in the way it was collecting payments and the AI bot was worse than useless - it actively suggested incorrect explanations and resulted in several days of…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. This shift toward &amp;#34;good enough&amp;#34; AI automation is viewed by some as a management strategy to make labor fungible, though it risks alienating customers who value human expertise &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48254660&quot; title=&quot;I used to see AI generated images with lots of unintelligible writing or misspelled words in slides, but the speaker left them in anyway. “Good enough” is not customer obsession. This enforced adoption of immature GenAI reminds me of Milo Minderbinder trying to make people eat cotton in Catch 22 , because he had inadvertently obtained a huge amount of it.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48254828&quot; title=&quot;I think a key goal of senior management at any big company in the last 6 months is to make rank and file fungible or obsolete. It’s one big experiment. There are precedents like the Industrial Revolution. Things get worse for the workers for a generation or so.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48254889&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; There are precedents like the Industrial Revolution. Things get worse for the workers for a generation or so. And things only got better post-Industrial Revolution when labor organized and forced the issue. There&amp;#39;s no guarantee that will work again if labor has reduced leverage due to AI reducing their value. I think in one way or another this all works itself out, but I&amp;#39;m not convinced it won&amp;#39;t be a very painful (and possibly violent) transition to whatever comes next.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, former employees note that organizational issues have intensified following leadership changes and failed bets on niche services, even as the company pivots toward custom AI hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48255231&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m also an AWS alumni from many years back now, and truthfully, the organizational problems really took off when Jassy moved to being CEO of amazon as a whole and major leaders left the company (Charlie Bell, et al.). There were always other problems too, pressure on the company in both directions across many different product lines on both cost (any number of cheaper baremetal providers who are much faster at providing customers instances than they were a decade ago), and product quality (any…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/21/scammers-are-abusing-an-internal-microsoft-account-to-send-spam/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Scammers are abusing an internal Microsoft account to send spam links&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techcrunch.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48253186&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;280 points · 153 comments · by spike021&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scammers are exploiting a loophole to send spam and phishing emails from a legitimate internal Microsoft account typically reserved for official security alerts and two-factor authentication codes. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/21/scammers-are-abusing-an-internal-microsoft-account-to-send-spam/&quot; title=&quot;Scammers are abusing an internal Microsoft account to send spam links | TechCrunch    The loophole allows spammers and scammers to send emails from a legitimate Microsoft email address typically used for sending genuine account alerts.    [![](https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/tc-lockup.svg) TechCrunch Desktop Logo](https://techcrunch.com)    [![](https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/tc-logo-mobile.svg) TechCrunch Mobile Logo](https://techcrunch.com)    *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights how Microsoft’s fragmented domain strategy and reliance on obscure URLs make it difficult for users to distinguish legitimate communications from scams &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48253916&quot; title=&quot;Who even can be sure microsoftonline.com is legit. Microsoft&amp;#39;s domain story is such a mess, I wouldn&amp;#39;t be surprised if not even internally they have one complete list of all the domain assets they own. But they are not alone. It is kind of ironic when companies insist that we check the domain to spot spam but are unable publish a list with all domains they officially use to send mail.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48256695&quot; title=&quot;Hard to beat Outlook 2007 which had some &amp;#39;smart tags&amp;#39; feature that all referenced &amp;#39;5iantlavalamp.com&amp;#39;, and things started breaking when that domain expired.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some regions have successfully reduced fraud by mandating official contact numbers, users note that caller ID spoofing remains a risk &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48254332&quot; title=&quot;Tangent: I used to receive at least a  dozen bank scam calls per day in India, especially during insurance renewal. I wanted the banks to publish official phone numbers and mandate their employees to use only official numbers. Recently the regulatory bodies did just that and so the banks should only use 1600 numbers to contact their customers. My bank scam calls have dropped to 0.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48254793&quot; title=&quot;Knowing what numbers are real through an official publication is very good, but it only allows you to place trust in calls you make, not calls you receive, because making calls doesn&amp;#39;t involve caller ID, receiving calls does, and caller ID is spoofable.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Consequently, there is a strong consensus that users should never trust incoming calls and should instead verify identities by calling official numbers directly, despite the frustration of legitimate institutions frequently using &amp;#34;scammer-like&amp;#34; tactics for unannounced outreach &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48254990&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s the number one rule though. If someone calls you claiming to be your bank, just say &amp;#39;I&amp;#39;ll call you back&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48255343&quot; title=&quot;Ask them their name/ last initial, employee ID or unique identifier for the conversation, direct phone number, job title and what location they&amp;#39;re based at. Scammers will pretty much always refuse/argue/hang up on this (once I had one start insulting my mother in Hindi when I asked him this). Then call your bank&amp;#39;s proper number and verify all of these details. (But in any case your bank will never call outwards to you, unless you&amp;#39;ve specifically requested that, which you almost never do.)&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48255389&quot; title=&quot;Unfortunately my UK banks (and others) DO regularly make calls to me unannounced and demand my ID to &amp;#39;prove who I am&amp;#39;.  They are not scam calls and the callers cannot understand what they are doing wrong.  If I&amp;#39;d had more strength in the last round of this stupidity I&amp;#39;d have done a number on them with the regulator.  (I used to work in finance and was the director of a regulated financial entity, so I think I&amp;#39;d have a head start.)&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48255814&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; They are not scam calls What are they, then? Sales/marketing calls? Or some security notifications (&amp;#39;we noticed some suspicious operations in the last 3 days...&amp;#39;)? If it&amp;#39;s the former, that&amp;#39;s still scam in my books. Specifically, it&amp;#39;s a first-party scam , as opposed to a third-party scam , where some third party pretends to be your bank. They both should be treated similarly; unfortunately, you can&amp;#39;t report first-party scams to police.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.hollandtech.net/claude-is-not-your-architect/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Claude is not your architect. Stop letting it pretend&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (hollandtech.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48259784&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;239 points · 174 comments · by cdrnsf&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The article warns that relying on AI like Claude for software architecture is dangerous because these tools prioritize agreeability over critical judgment and lack essential organizational context, urging leaders to ensure human engineers remain responsible for high-level design and accountability. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.hollandtech.net/claude-is-not-your-architect/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Claude Is Not Your Architect. Stop Letting It Pretend.    URL Source: https://www.hollandtech.net/claude-is-not-your-architect/    Published Time: 2026-04-06T00:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  I’ve seen it three times in the last month. Three different organisations, three different tech stacks, the same pattern.    Someone has an idea. Maybe a product manager, maybe a team lead, maybe the CTO after a conference. They open Claude, or ChatGPT, or Copilot — doesn’t matter which — and ask it what…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether AI&amp;#39;s tendency to be &amp;#34;subservient&amp;#34; and agreeable is a fundamental flaw or a necessary trait for a tool, with some arguing that users must learn to prompt for criticism to avoid the &amp;#34;attaboy problem&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260260&quot; title=&quot;Re: &amp;#39;the attaboy problem&amp;#39;. I strongly disagree that this is a problem. What we have is a anthropomorphism problem. AI is a tool. It needs to be subservient. You actually can get it to point out issues in your design, if you just put enough humility and uncertainty in your prompt formulation, but more importantly, we have all seen that Claude makes mistakes. The title of this post is that it&amp;#39;s a poor architect. Imagine if it wasn&amp;#39;t subservient. It&amp;#39;d just shut down your input to steer it in the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260108&quot; title=&quot;I think the article has the correct message, but I disagree with this: &amp;gt; It’s just incapable of the thing that makes a real architect valuable: saying “no.” From my experience Claude is excellent at saying &amp;#39;no&amp;#39;. It won&amp;#39;t say &amp;#39;no&amp;#39; if the prompt doesn&amp;#39;t call for it (it won&amp;#39;t say &amp;#39;no&amp;#39; to your direct request to do something, usually). But it offers good critique and happily pushes back if you make it clear that that&amp;#39;s a first class option.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users report that AI can successfully implement complex architectures when provided with strict constraints and expert oversight &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48259908&quot; title=&quot;For fun I&amp;#39;ve been vibe coding something I know well: toolchains.  Maybe not the right thing to vibe code.  But I can more or less judge the quality of the output. When left to its own devices with the instructions &amp;#39;make an assembler for the architecture in ISA.md&amp;#39; -- well Claude picked Python as the implementation language.  Tokens lifted through a bunch of regex.  No expression parser!  Oh dear.  My first assembler was like that too, to be fair. However, when I described the desired passes and…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others share anecdotes of catastrophic design failures when inexperienced developers rely on AI to act as a primary architect &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260824&quot; title=&quot;I have a good story to share that I came across recently. Around 2 years ago I had to clean up a mess because someone who doesn&amp;#39;t really know what they&amp;#39;re doing designed an instancing system for a game. They heavily used AI to design every part of it and it was awful. Data corruption, performance problems, lost items, race conditions everything you can think of was an issue. It took me 2 weeks just to get it to an &amp;#39;acceptable&amp;#39; level and it was still awful as the whole design was simply flawed.…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong consensus that AI&amp;#39;s authoritative tone often masks significant errors, leading to a &amp;#34;confidence problem&amp;#34; that requires users to remain constantly vigilant, especially in unfamiliar technical territory &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260378&quot; title=&quot;AI uses a high confidence tone - likely because its training data is heavy on authoritative texts/reference books. And it does get people into a lot of trouble. I have got into trouble with it when it is extremely confident about something I am not very familiar with (as recently as two weeks ago with Claude). I have also had long drawn out &amp;#39;arguments&amp;#39; when I have known it&amp;#39;s wrong based on my experience and intuition, and it has steadfastly refused to take my point (last week) I have learnt to…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260409&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;And it does get people into a lot of trouble. Pretty much everyone takes it at face value unless we know otherwise from prior experience.  Even the most advanced models make embarrassing mistakes and fumble with simple tasks. Yet we are very willing to give them exceptional slack for it? I wish I knew why.  Are people just that easily overcome by confident voices?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, participants disagree on whether the current chat interface—which mimics human social interaction—is a useful feature or a manipulative design that exploits innate human instincts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260305&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;anthropomorphism problem. AI is a tool. It needs to be subservient. Suggesting it should be &amp;#39;subservient&amp;#39; is also anthropomorphizing.  I think your callout is correct, but you still can&amp;#39;t help but refer to it in terms we use for other people or living entities.  This is by design from the AI companies.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260660&quot; title=&quot;Humans’ general inability to entirely divorce social instincts, responses, and mores while using human language to communicate, especially with something that pantomimes it back, is one of the reasons current chat interfaces are fundamentally flawed. This is working against innate behavior … not something that can be easily switched off. I’ll bet most of the people that can really do it have a hard time intuitively navigating real social interactions. It also makes it an incredible tool for…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;[7&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://corrode.dev/learn/migration-guides/go-to-rust/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Migrating from Go to Rust&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (corrode.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48259808&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;202 points · 199 comments · by jabits&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This guide explores migrating backend services from Go to Rust, highlighting how Rust’s type system replaces Go’s runtime checks to eliminate `nil` panics and data races. While acknowledging Go&amp;#39;s superior compile speeds and simpler concurrency, it details how Rust offers better correctness guarantees, predictable latency, and zero-cost generics. &lt;a href=&quot;https://corrode.dev/learn/migration-guides/go-to-rust/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Migrating from Go to Rust | corrode Rust Consulting    URL Source: https://corrode.dev/learn/migration-guides/go-to-rust/    Published Time: Fri, 22 May 2026 15:14:32 GMT    Markdown Content:  Out of all the migrations I help teams with, Go to Rust is a bit of an outlier. It’s not a question of “is Rust faster?” or “does Rust have types?”, Go already gets you most of the way there. The discussion is mostly about **correctness guarantees**, **runtime tradeoffs**, and **developer ergonomics**.    A…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate over migrating from Go to Rust for web services centers on the trade-off between Rust&amp;#39;s superior performance and Go&amp;#39;s development velocity and mature standard library &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260995&quot; title=&quot;I could see migrating from C or C++ or Python to Rust, for various reasons, but for web back-end work Go is a good match. I write almost entirely in Rust, but the last time I had to do something web server side in Rust, I now wish I&amp;#39;d used Go. The OP points out the wordyness of Go&amp;#39;s error syntax. That&amp;#39;s a good point. Rust started with the same problem, and added the &amp;#39;?&amp;#39; syntax, which just does a return with an error value on errors. Most Go error handling is exactly that, written out. Rust…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48261000&quot; title=&quot;Rust is great. However in an agentic world go will win. Look no further than incremental build times. This, combined with high token costs mean that for a given application it simply will cost more to to write it in Rust than Go. This can easily be justified for many usecases, but for your vanilla crud app, do you really need Rust? Per the article, you are getting 20-50% better more performance with Rust. Not worth it unless your team was already fluent in Rust. Now consider a scenario where…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While proponents of Rust highlight its &amp;#34;correctness&amp;#34; and compile-time guarantees as essential for managing AI-generated code, critics argue that Rust&amp;#39;s slow build times and fragmented error-handling ecosystem make it &amp;#34;overkill&amp;#34; for standard CRUD applications &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48261000&quot; title=&quot;Rust is great. However in an agentic world go will win. Look no further than incremental build times. This, combined with high token costs mean that for a given application it simply will cost more to to write it in Rust than Go. This can easily be justified for many usecases, but for your vanilla crud app, do you really need Rust? Per the article, you are getting 20-50% better more performance with Rust. Not worth it unless your team was already fluent in Rust. Now consider a scenario where…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260930&quot; title=&quot;This is probably going to sound generic / repetitive, but my biggest complaint about Rust is the package management situation, which is entirely the result of the developer mindset. I love the ergonomics on the rust side (the functional approach to data types is beautiful), but I’m working on two projects side by side, one in rust and one in go at the moment. The dependency trees are entirely different beasts, with most of the stuff on the go project covered by the stdlib whereas I think the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48261102&quot; title=&quot;Because the agentic world involves the generation of so much code that gets harder to review, I would think the compile-time guarantees of Rust would make it a better option.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, many developers view the choice as a matter of preference regarding managed runtimes and language ergonomics rather than a strict technical requirement &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48261529&quot; title=&quot;This is a weird document that is simultaneously trying to serve as a migration guide and an advocacy document for Rust. Ultimately, if you have to ask , the Rust vs. Go consideration boils down almost completely to &amp;#39;do you want a managed runtime or not&amp;#39;. A generation of Rust programmers has convinced itself that &amp;#39;managed runtime&amp;#39; is bad, that not having one is an important feature. But that&amp;#39;s obviously false: there are more programming domains where you want a managed runtime than ones where…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fs.blog/knowledge-project-podcast/greg-brockman/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Greg Brockman interview [video]&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (fs.blog)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48255593&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;193 points · 197 comments · by prakashqwerty&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI President Greg Brockman discusses the company&amp;#39;s technical evolution, the shift from its nonprofit structure, and the internal turmoil surrounding Sam Altman’s brief firing, while offering insights into the future of AGI and AI&amp;#39;s impact on the workforce. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fs.blog/knowledge-project-podcast/greg-brockman/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Greg Brockman: Inside the 72 Hours That Almost Killed OpenAI    URL Source: https://fs.blog/knowledge-project-podcast/greg-brockman/    Published Time: Thu, 21 May 2026 08:47:37 GMT    Markdown Content:  [The Knowledge Project Podcast](https://fs.blog/knowledge-project-podcast/)    The AI race, the future of AGI, and the inside story of OpenAI.    Greg Brockman is the co-founder and President of OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT and GPT-5. He was the first engineer at Stripe before leaving in 2015…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the tension between OpenAI’s original non-profit mission and its transition to a for-profit structure, with some users questioning the legality and ethics of using a non-profit to &amp;#34;enrich&amp;#34; individuals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257428&quot; title=&quot;I just don’t understand why a non-profit was allowed to do this. Does this not set a precedent that non-profit doesn’t actually mean anything? You can just use a favorable structure until it’s time to enrich yourself.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257076&quot; title=&quot;What about stealing 12 million books of copyrighted human culture, at massive scale, and then enclosing the value created inside proprietary, investor-backed systems? Something wrong with that? What happens if you go tomorrow, downtown San Francisco, and leave a bookstore with one book without paying? &amp;#39;Behind every great fortune there is a crime&amp;#39;           - Honoré de Balzac&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While Greg Brockman cites the immense cost of compute as the &amp;#34;real reason&amp;#34; for the shift, critics point to his personal diary entries regarding a desire for $1B as evidence of different motivations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48256109&quot; title=&quot;As far as Brockman account of the past goes, there&amp;#39;s also his personal diary which was made public as a part of that lawsuit by Musk. Includes for example the line: &amp;#39;Financially what will take me to $1B?&amp;#39;. BTW, if you don&amp;#39;t know, Musk lost it because he filed too late, lol.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48256166&quot; title=&quot;Not feeling like 1 hour of my Sunday is worth listening to this, do anyone have the non-clickbait answers to the two &amp;#39;previews&amp;#39; mentioned in the description? &amp;gt; Greg explains how the original Napa offsite produced the three-step technical plan OpenAI has followed for a decade and the real reason OpenAI had to abandon its pure nonprofit structure What was the technical plan and what was the &amp;#39;real reason&amp;#39; they couldn&amp;#39;t achieve their original goals?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48256262&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; What was the technical plan &amp;#39;1. Solve reinforcement learning 2. Solve unsupervised learning 3. Gradually learn more complicated &amp;#39;things&amp;#39;&amp;#39; That three point list is verbatim the extent of the technical plan mentioned. &amp;gt; what was the &amp;#39;real reason&amp;#39; they couldn&amp;#39;t achieve their original goals? Paraphrasing, &amp;#39;we needed more money for compute and didn&amp;#39;t think we could get enough as a non-profit&amp;#39;. Brockman&amp;#39;s diary might be a stronger indicator of the real real reason, though.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others argue that wanting wealth is not inherently wrong and note that the non-profit entity still exists and holds a massive equity stake in the for-profit company &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48256321&quot; title=&quot;If his entire personal diary got exposed and that&amp;#39;s the worst that&amp;#39;s in it, good for him.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48256755&quot; title=&quot;Worse? There is nothing wrong with wanting 1B. Anybody who said they wouldn&amp;#39;t want it is lying.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258627&quot; title=&quot;I think it would be helpful for you to clarify which part of the chain you found objectionable: - in 2015, OpenAI was founded as a Delaware nonprofit - in 2017, OpenAI discovered the scaling laws and realized they needed far more compute (and thus money) than they had initially anticipated - that discovery precipitated a series of negotiations between the founders on how to restructure OpenAI to raise more money for compute, ultimately resulting in Musk’s departure when the other founders would…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.statnews.com/2026/05/22/seed-oils-healthy-fats-tallow-fact-check-cardiac-health/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The seed oil panic is hurting my cardiac patients&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (statnews.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257532&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;150 points · &lt;strong&gt;219 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by randycupertino&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A clinical dietitian warns that the &amp;#34;seed oil panic&amp;#34; is leading cardiac patients to replace healthy unsaturated fats with heart-clogging animal fats like beef tallow, despite scientific evidence showing that vegetable oils actually lower the risk of cardiovascular disease. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.statnews.com/2026/05/22/seed-oils-healthy-fats-tallow-fact-check-cardiac-health/&quot; title=&quot;The seed oil panic is hurting my cardiac patients    “My patients are replacing olive oil with beef tallow, even if they don&amp;#39;t tell me during cardiac rehab,” writes a clinical dietitian.    [Skip to Main Content](#wrapper)    [![STAT](/wp-content/themes/stat/images/STAT10-Years-White.svg)  ![STAT](/wp-content/themes/stat/images/stat-logo-10.svg)](https://www.statnews.com/)    * [Manage alerts for this article](/my-account/edit/#emails)  * [Email this…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate centers on whether the &amp;#34;seed oil panic&amp;#34; is a distraction from the proven harms of sugar and ultra-processed foods, which often contain both ingredients &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258106&quot; title=&quot;Seed oils probably aren&amp;#39;t ideal, but I also worry how much this narrative is distracting from the bigger problem of sugar consumption. Humans only have so much attention and discipline. It would be a shame to focus all that energy on a &amp;#39;no seed oil&amp;#39; diet only to wind up even more unhealthy. How many products with seed oil also contain some form of added sugar? I don&amp;#39;t seem to have much issue with moderating the occasional bag of cheezits or goldfish, but the moment I start getting into cookies…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258380&quot; title=&quot;Yep. If there was one single thing that literally every person should do for their health, that is to greatly reduce or completely eliminate sugar. The evidence is overwhelming. The evidence against seed oils is not quite as convincing. I see seed oils as a low quality food to be avoided - goes rancid too easily, requires chemical processing, etc. - but it&amp;#39;s not strictly poison. These oils are in virtually every industrial &amp;#39;food product&amp;#39; which makes them unhealthy by association. Stop eating…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that industrially refined oils are &amp;#34;novel foods&amp;#34; with questionable chemical processing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258146&quot; title=&quot;Two things can be harmful at once. I am curious which is worse in terms of contribution to modern chronic metabolic disease. In the case of ultra-processed/refined oils though, there is an argument to be made that these are novel foods that humans never ate until very recently.  There aren&amp;#39;t any old people who have been eating them their whole lives in the quantities we do now.  This is probably true for industrially refined sugar too, but sugar is a more complex story since people have been…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258407&quot; title=&quot;Yes, I wasn&amp;#39;t talking about unrefined olive, flax, sesame, or coconut.  I don&amp;#39;t think most people concerned about &amp;#39;seed oils&amp;#39; are concerned about those. It&amp;#39;s the refined soybean oil, canola/rapeseed oil, cottonseed oil, grapeseed oil, sunflower seed oil, corn oil, safflower oil, peanut oil - these are the modern refined oils I&amp;#39;m referring to that were never eaten until very recently.  I&amp;#39;d be dubious of refined / ultra processed olive and avocado oil too, which is a different thing from fresh…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257874&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;eat less ultra-processed food&amp;#39; well, how do you think Canola Oil is made exactly? it&amp;#39;s cracked, cooked, pressed, washed in hexane and acid, neutralized with caustic soda, bleached, deodorized on what planet is that not ultra processed? so, i should avoid ultra-processed food, except oils that are ultra-processed? whereas tallow, is...cut from meat i&amp;#39;m not suggesting you should only eat tallow, I&amp;#39;m just saying it&amp;#39;s not ultra-processed.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the evidence against them is unscientific and lacks a clear mechanism of action compared to the overwhelming data against sugar &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258380&quot; title=&quot;Yep. If there was one single thing that literally every person should do for their health, that is to greatly reduce or completely eliminate sugar. The evidence is overwhelming. The evidence against seed oils is not quite as convincing. I see seed oils as a low quality food to be avoided - goes rancid too easily, requires chemical processing, etc. - but it&amp;#39;s not strictly poison. These oils are in virtually every industrial &amp;#39;food product&amp;#39; which makes them unhealthy by association. Stop eating…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258647&quot; title=&quot;It isn’t clear at all how refining oil makes it materially “worse” in terms of health than the unrefined equivalent. That claim lacks both evidence and a mechanism of action. Every argument I’ve seen demonstrates a pretty fundamental misunderstanding of the chemistry. These same bad chemistry takes are repeated everywhere by influencers. This isn’t unique to the oil discussions, dietary health is rife with vibe-based chemistry takes that are obviously unscientific.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a general consensus that health improves by shifting toward whole foods and away from highly processed products, though patients are reportedly confused by the nuances of which fats to prioritize &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257778&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Back in the hospital, my patients are replacing olive oil with beef tallow This is a weird thing to call out since olive oil isn&amp;#39;t a seed oil. Is the point that patients are confused? Does the author (a purported dietitian) not know this himself/herself?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257818&quot; title=&quot;I try to take the middle road: Making 50-75%+ of my calories come from refined, powderized carbs and sugar (original food pyramid) - Bad Eating whole foods, lightly cooked. Whole food starch sources, often retrograde starch. avoid high heat fried foods, eat mostly leaner meats - Good Declaring plants and seed oils evil, nothing but lard, tallow and red meat and a dozen eggs a day - Bad Two meals day with no snacking works for me. 3 meals a day feels like im stuffing myself.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257841&quot; title=&quot;If people got 75% of their calories from plant based whole foods, a lot of health problems would probably disappear overnight.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://audiomass.co/?multitrack=1&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Audiomass – a free, open-source multitrack audio editor for the web&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (audiomass.co)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258015&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;285 points · 58 comments · by pantelisk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AudioMass is a free, open-source, web-based multitrack audio editor that allows users to record, edit, and apply effects to waveforms entirely within the browser without plugins. &lt;a href=&quot;https://audiomass.co/?multitrack=1&quot; title=&quot;Title: AudioMass    URL Source: https://audiomass.co/?multitrack=1    Published Time: Mon, 18 May 2026 18:14:04 GMT    Markdown Content:  # AudioMass - Audio Editor    File    Export / Download    Load from Computer    Load Sample File    Load From URL    New Recording    Save Draft Locally    Open Local Drafts    Edit    Undo Shft+Z    Redo Shft+Y    Play Space    Stop    Select All Shft+A    Deselect All ~    Channel Info/Flip    Seamless Loop    Zero Cross Selection    Effects    Gain    Fade In    Fade Out    Noise Reduction…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users praised Audiomass for its impressive functionality and &amp;#34;calm&amp;#34; design within a remarkably small 100kb footprint, though some requested support for additional formats like XM &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48261584&quot; title=&quot;It seems like the inspiration went from Audacity, and with great changes to the design and feel of calmness and solidity!        I&amp;#39;ve tried loading a file with XM format, yet the current state of the import logic stated &amp;#39;Unsupported&amp;#39;. Is there any chance you&amp;#39;ll support the format?          For example, the following artwork is radiating charmingly in VLC:        - https://cable.ayra.ch/modplayer/mods/!Others/DYNAMITE_-_Winamp_5.0RC8_crk.xm        And, thank you! very much for the experiments, effort,…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48261629&quot; title=&quot;Thank you :) I &amp;#39;ll look into it, I am a little cautious of bloating up the filesize (right now it&amp;#39;s at 98kb of js and 10kb of css), but if I can make something work efficiently I &amp;#39;ll give it a go. On an unrelated note, I&amp;#39;m a little surprised there is no good open source web audio tracker (like Renoise but for the web) out there yet...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48262136&quot; title=&quot;For that much functionality 98kb is hardly bloated at all by modern standards, impressively slight in fact, it could probably cope with some more. Unless part of your fun is keeping it so very trim, of course!&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters viewed the tool as a welcome alternative to Audacity, others debated whether Audacity has recently improved or if other alternatives like Ocenaudio are superior &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48261750&quot; title=&quot;This is great. I need to do audio work this coming week and was dreading Audacity.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48262132&quot; title=&quot;Try Ocenaudio - I’ve used pretty much every audio editor free and paid for and this is my go to for a free editor. I also cannot understand why anyone would recommend Audacity.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48261819&quot; title=&quot;when have you last tried audacity? it&amp;#39;s been getting friendlier&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant interest in expanding the tool&amp;#39;s capabilities toward cloud-based collaborative &amp;#34;jamming&amp;#34; and version control for audio tracks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48262188&quot; title=&quot;So want something like this but where the tracks are in the cloud. I want to &amp;#39;check out&amp;#39; someone&amp;#39;s drum loop and add a guitar riff. Check it into a branch. Someone else checks out the drum+guitar, adds a bass line. Checks in. &amp;#39;Jamming&amp;#39; with other people is one of the most fun things. To the degree that you can &amp;#39;get close&amp;#39; on the web… RiffHub, anyone?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48262535&quot; title=&quot;Bandlab Studio, maybe? Never used it, but might be what you&amp;#39;re looking for. There&amp;#39;s a web version and a mobile app. https://www.bandlab.com/creation-features&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06445&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Constraint Decay: The Fragility of LLM Agents in Back End Code Generation&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (arxiv.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48256912&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;211 points · 113 comments · by wek&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A study reveals that LLM agents suffer from &amp;#34;constraint decay,&amp;#34; showing a significant performance drop in backend code generation as structural requirements and architectural constraints increase, particularly within convention-heavy frameworks like Django and FastAPI. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06445&quot; title=&quot;Title: Constraint Decay: The Fragility of LLM Agents in Backend Code Generation    URL Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06445    Published Time: Fri, 08 May 2026 01:10:58 GMT    Markdown Content:  [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.06445)[HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2605.06445v1)    &amp;gt; Abstract:Large Language Model (LLM) agents demonstrate strong performance in autonomous code generation under loose specifications. However, production-grade software requires strict adherence to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The study highlights &amp;#34;constraint decay,&amp;#34; where LLM agents excel at functional prototyping but struggle to maintain complex architectural and stylistic rules in production-grade backend code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257705&quot; title=&quot;“Our systematic study exposes a phenomenon of constraint decay in LLM-based coding agents. While current models excel at unconstrained generation, their performance drops when forced to navigate explicit architectural rules. For end-users, this dichotomy implies that agents are reliable for rapid prototyping but remain unreliable for production-grade backend development.” One major weakness of this study is that they didn’t fully test frontier models for cost reasons, so the specific…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257683&quot; title=&quot;Reminds me of the recent paper about delegating document editing tasks to LLMs across different disciplines [1]. That paper found that programming was the only discipline most LLMs can perform long horizon tasks on without accumulating errors &amp;amp; corrupting the document. I&amp;#39;ve only read the abstract of this one so far but it seems like this paper has zoomed in on programming with greater fidelity and shown a similar phenomenon. But not about long horizon tasks, more like &amp;#39;long style horizons&amp;#39; of…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters note that as users add more constraints to manage this complexity, they risk merely shifting technical debt from deterministic programming languages to non-deterministic natural language &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48262627&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m a convert. I was 100% skeptical about LLM code generation, now over 80% of the professional code I write is generated. That said, the limitations are kind of obvious and are starting to show in some of my projects, and this article seems to confirm my suspicions. If it&amp;#39;s just confirmation bias or not, I can&amp;#39;t say yet. In my experience, for anything complex enough, I have to start adding more and more constraints, style guides, corner cases, error handling, optimization guidelines and all…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue LLMs lack genuine reasoning &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258049&quot; title=&quot;These things don’t think. We’re going to have to reiterate this for a long time, I fear.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest performance improves significantly when models are provided with direct code examples to emulate rather than abstract style guides &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258499&quot; title=&quot;I think it&amp;#39;s downstream of &amp;#39;you can&amp;#39;t optimize for two different objectives&amp;#39;. If you only have functional requirements, then in effect you&amp;#39;re doing some form of program synthesis, and RL can optimize that very hard. If you have a mixture of functional and non-functional requirements, you are basically giving the model an incomplete specification, and it must in some way guess at the user&amp;#39;s intent to fill in the blanks. This is also why adding to the prompt examples of the style of code you want…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258661&quot; title=&quot;I am obviously paraphrasing, but the general idea is that trying to synthesize style from a codebase into e.g. a markdown guide generally doesn&amp;#39;t work very well. What achieves style transfer is providing the model with a lot of examples of the style, conventions, patterns you want. To put it in practice: if you point claude/codex to a repository and you ask it to implement feature X using style guide Y, the code will probably work, but you can usually get better results by saying &amp;#39;do it in the…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://abyss.fish/your_dotfiles_are_not_a_distro&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Omarchy Is Not A Distro&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (abyss.fish)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257612&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;167 points · 154 comments · by j3s&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that DHH’s &amp;#34;Omarchy&amp;#34; is not a legitimate Linux distribution but rather a collection of personal dotfiles and proprietary software shortcuts layered over Arch Linux to capitalize on inexperienced users. &lt;a href=&quot;https://abyss.fish/your_dotfiles_are_not_a_distro&quot; title=&quot;Title: abyss * your_dotfiles_are_not_a_distro    URL Source: https://abyss.fish/your_dotfiles_are_not_a_distro    Markdown Content:  ### omarchy is not a distro    omarchy is [DHH](https://dhh.dk/)&amp;#39;s latest infatuation - omarchy [describes itself](https://github.com/basecamp/omarchy) like so: &amp;gt; Omarchy is a beautiful, modern &amp;amp; opinionated Linux distribution by DHH. as a longtime frequenter of [r/unixporn](https://old.reddit.com/r/unixporn/), it was immediately apparent to me that omarchy is not a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether Omarchy, an opinionated Arch Linux configuration by DHH, provides a valuable &amp;#34;out of box&amp;#34; experience for users who find traditional setups frustrating &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258743&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve tried to setup Arch with Hyprland like 3 times on my own and with the most popular dot files. It was terrible, frustrating and things broke all the time. Omarchy fixed that and I can&amp;#39;t recommend it enough.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258843&quot; title=&quot;We seem to have arrived at a set of assumptions that states that if a large number of people like something that we don’t, or don’t subscribe to some cultural norms that we doggedly adhere to, then there has to be something sinister afoot. The out of box experience with Omarchy is highly functional, aesthetically pleasing and challenges users to lean more on keyboard shortcuts than they’d typically be used to. That’s clever because once you’re whizzing around with these shortcuts you feel…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258856&quot; title=&quot;If I remember it correctly  Omarchy started as an in-house alternative to macOS in one of DHHs companies. And was then released to the public. So the purpose of Omarchy was to get devices quickly set up with some opinionated defaults.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that packaging a &amp;#34;rice&amp;#34; as a distinct entity is amateurish and potentially &amp;#34;sinister,&amp;#34; likening its rapid rise to influencer-driven marketing rather than technical merit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258819&quot; title=&quot;Did dhh provide a recipe to install hyprland properly without having to install a full &amp;#39;distribution&amp;#39;? (I don&amp;#39;t know, it&amp;#39;s a real question) It feels very strange (and wrong) to me: if there is difficulties in installing something, try to help people instead of packaging the solution with other things that are not related. It feels a bit like if uv was mainly providing their &amp;#39;uvOS&amp;#39; to solve the difficulties of dealing with python packages.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258588&quot; title=&quot;It is understandable to be frustrated at a project without technical merit gaining so much traction when, as in the author&amp;#39;s words, &amp;#39;longstanding distros like Debian have struggled with funding and sponsorship for decades&amp;#39;. However, I do feel the author fails to come up with any conclusion as to why there is such a disparity between interest in traditional distributions and this rice. I agree that it is almost suspicious how quickly it has risen to prominence. There has been a surge of hugely…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258978&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;then there has to be something sinister afoot. because most of the time there is. We live in a world that is dominated by obnoxious social media influencers and &amp;#39;taste makers&amp;#39; who push people to the every day. This is the linux version of Mr. Beast lunchables. Having a conference and corporate sponsorships for what is 500 lines of bash scripting is beyond silly. And like the other half dozen arch based &amp;#39;desktop reskin disguised as distro&amp;#39; things, when it eventually breaks or stops being…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48259987&quot; title=&quot;It is not what I&amp;#39;m saying, of course. I&amp;#39;m saying that if they ended up shipping the house because the house contains their new useful microwave but forget to ship the microwave independently, it is something that should decrease their reputation, it looks silly and amateurish. Of course, I&amp;#39;m not saying that they should solve my problem for me. Simply, they are doing things in a complicated way either uselessly or either non-fully-honnestly.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. However, supporters contend that making Linux more accessible and aesthetically pleasing is inherently good, regardless of whether it adheres to established cultural norms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258843&quot; title=&quot;We seem to have arrived at a set of assumptions that states that if a large number of people like something that we don’t, or don’t subscribe to some cultural norms that we doggedly adhere to, then there has to be something sinister afoot. The out of box experience with Omarchy is highly functional, aesthetically pleasing and challenges users to lean more on keyboard shortcuts than they’d typically be used to. That’s clever because once you’re whizzing around with these shortcuts you feel…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258489&quot; title=&quot;What a strange thing to publish.. just don&amp;#39;t use it if you don&amp;#39;t like it? What is this even attempting to do?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/may/24/ai-washing-pr-firms-scrambling-rebrand&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;#39;AI washing&amp;#39;: firms are scrambling to rebrand themselves as tech-focused&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theguardian.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257980&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;157 points · 146 comments · by Brajeshwar&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PR executives report that many UK companies are &amp;#34;AI washing&amp;#34; by rebranding ordinary automation as artificial intelligence to capitalize on tech industry hype. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/may/24/ai-washing-pr-firms-scrambling-rebrand&quot; title=&quot;‘AI washing’: firms are scrambling to rebrand themselves as tech-focused    PR executives say UK companies are forcing them to present ordinary automation as artificial intelligence    [Skip to main content](#maincontent)[Skip to navigation](#navigation)    Close dialogue1/2Next imagePrevious imageToggle caption    [Print…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Companies are increasingly rebranding ordinary automation as &amp;#34;AI&amp;#34; to satisfy shareholders, a trend critics compare to previous buzzword cycles like &amp;#34;big data&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;the cloud&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258586&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; PR executives say UK companies are forcing them to present ordinary automation as artificial intelligence What a time to be alive&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258904&quot; title=&quot;To be fair, that’s not exactly a new thing, it’s just sensitive to the exact phase of the Great AI Freeze/Thaw Cycle. A lot of now-ordinary automation used to be &amp;#39;AI&amp;#39; until it become commonplace and no longer buzzword-worthy and thus no longer regarded as &amp;#39;AI&amp;#39;, and/or an AI winter hit. Last time that AI was big before DL it was the &amp;#39;big data&amp;#39; fad and everything had to be big data. Marketing has never not been about how to disguise &amp;#39;what we already do&amp;#39; as the newest buzzword that customers (or…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. However, users warn this strategy may backfire due to a visceral negative perception among younger generations who associate AI with &amp;#34;slop,&amp;#34; environmental costs, and job displacement &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48259662&quot; title=&quot;I hope these companies aren&amp;#39;t in for a shock when the younger generation rejects their brands https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/920401/g... If negative perception towards AI grows, either because of negative experiences after having it forced on them, or as people&amp;#39;s utility bills skyrocket, or as the environmental impact becomes more apparent, they might find that what appeals to shareholders doesn&amp;#39;t impress the people who usually pay for their products.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48259705&quot; title=&quot;My kid was an excited Duolingo user who immediately cut it off entirely as soon as he heard that they were doing something with AI. That was all it took. He heard &amp;#39;Duolingo&amp;#39;s AI now&amp;#39; on some YouTube video, and it was immediately dead to him. I don&amp;#39;t think people understand just how viscerally negative the perception of AI is for the youth.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260369&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; You&amp;#39;re being downvoted because you appear to be not asking genuinely I literally said I was asking genuinely. It&amp;#39;s either one of two reasons imo: 1. Their son hates &amp;#39;ai slop&amp;#39; and doesn&amp;#39;t think AI is useful. 2. Their son is afraid of not being employable. I see #1 the most here. But I suspect it&amp;#39;s a front because the posters don&amp;#39;t want to admit #2.  Hence my question. I figured it&amp;#39;s easier for someone to admit someone else is afraid than admit they are.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some investors still chase these pivots—even in unrelated industries like footwear—others view AI-centric marketing as a negative indicator that a company lacks a clear value proposition &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258197&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d love to read the mind of an investor that actually falls for this shit. Who actually thinks that Allbirds will see much higher returns because they &amp;#39;have an AI graphics division?&amp;#39; I like AI, but seriously, who actually invests on this basis? Where is the critical thinking? I don&amp;#39;t feel sympathy for any investor that gets rug pulled on this stuff.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258493&quot; title=&quot;My favourite is Allbirds that pivoted from eco friendly shoes to AI infrastructure. How do you even make that decision?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260282&quot; title=&quot;I see AI marketing as a negative indicator.  Because everyone should be doing AI it’s not a differentiator.  It implicitly means you don’t know what value you provide.  It’s like advertising you’re cloud powered because you use AWS.  Which makes recall a bunch of companies doing.  What value do you provide, not what tech do you use.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://susam.net/childhood-computing.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Childhood Computing&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (susam.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48256597&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;183 points · 92 comments · by blenderob&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Susam Pal reflects on his 1990s childhood introduction to computing, detailing how he learned Logo programming on diskless IBM PCs and eventually fulfilled a lifelong dream by developing his own arcade-style game decades later. &lt;a href=&quot;https://susam.net/childhood-computing.html&quot; title=&quot;Childhood Computing - Susam Pal    # Childhood Computing    By **Susam Pal** on 24 May 2026    I recently stumbled upon a nice blog post titled  [Childhood  Computing](https://lilysthings.org/blog/childhood-computing/). It made me think about my own childhood computing  experience. I am much older than the author of the aforementioned  post, but like them, I too love computers. I have for most of my  life.    In 1992, when I was eight years old, my parents decided to transfer  me to a new school because of…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Early computing careers were often sparked by the &amp;#34;tinkerability&amp;#34; of older systems, where pre-installed tools like QBasic and accessible graphics modes allowed children to experiment with immediate results &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257607&quot; title=&quot;One thing that was nice about the graphics programming those days was that when you drew something on the screen, it remained there until your program erased it. This means that you could create cool looking graphics easily. For example, you can just compute the points of a circle and draw the points one by one, and in the screen it will show a full circle being drawn. &amp;#39;Modern&amp;#39; graphics libs (even SDL I think), made this impossible by having redraw the whole screen every frame so that now my…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257730&quot; title=&quot;I essentially owe my career to two great strokes of luck. The first was that my father purchased a PC in the early 1990s to help out with his self-employed publishing business, and like most PCs of the time, it came preloaded with QBasic and the source code for a couple of games like GORILLA.BAS that an introverted kid with a lot of free time could mess around with. The second was attending a high school with a reasonably well funded computer lab and an unusually open minded computer teacher.…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some credit their success to this open architecture, others argue that socioeconomic factors—such as having tech-inclined parents and access to well-funded school labs—were the more significant &amp;#34;strokes of luck&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257329&quot; title=&quot;At school we had a bunch of older machines with windows 3.1, which had some touch typing program installed - it was the only thing we were allowed to use Our first family computer was bought back in 1995. IIRC it was a 166 MHz Pentium / 16 MB ram machine with Windows 95. It cost around $3500-4000 back then, and that&amp;#39;s not adjusted for inflation. EDIT: As a side note, 3 years later I managed to get my hands on a copy of Half-Life, right after it was launched. Our computer, with standalone…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260396&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;I essentially owe my career to two great strokes of luck. &amp;gt;The first was that my father purchased a PC in the early 1990s &amp;gt;The second was attending a high school with a reasonably well funded computer lab So, you essentially own your career to your parents being well-off and tech inclined . It&amp;#39;s not like you ended up in that high school by accident . Sure, being born in such a family is a stroke of luck that many people don&amp;#39;t get to have. I did; my mom was a software engineer in the USSR, and…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a shared concern that modern technology has become too locked down and &amp;#34;financialized,&amp;#34; potentially depriving today&amp;#39;s youth of the same exploratory freedom &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257730&quot; title=&quot;I essentially owe my career to two great strokes of luck. The first was that my father purchased a PC in the early 1990s to help out with his self-employed publishing business, and like most PCs of the time, it came preloaded with QBasic and the source code for a couple of games like GORILLA.BAS that an introverted kid with a lot of free time could mess around with. The second was attending a high school with a reasonably well funded computer lab and an unusually open minded computer teacher.…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257165&quot; title=&quot;I never understood why Microsoft didn&amp;#39;t have affordable licences to encourage kids to program. The school computer lab had Visual Basic but you only got an hour week in there as part of the computing subject, the school library computers couldn&amp;#39;t have it because the licence was per seat not per site. You really only had QBASIC which was great but we really wanted to write Windows apps. You&amp;#39;d be up for a thousand dollars for a MSDN academic subscription just to get Visual Basic. I guess the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257472&quot; title=&quot;As computers grew more powerful, they became less interesting. There is a lesson in there somewhere that humanity has not yet woken up to.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cbp.gov/document/directives/cbp-directive-no-3340-049b-border-search-electronic-devices&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;CBP Directive 3340-049B: Border Search of Electronic Devices&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cbp.gov)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260140&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;140 points · 100 comments · by Ember_Wipe&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) issued Directive No. 3340-049B to establish standard operating procedures for searching, reviewing, and sharing information from electronic devices during inbound and outbound border searches. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cbp.gov/document/directives/cbp-directive-no-3340-049b-border-search-electronic-devices&quot; title=&quot;Title: CBP Directive No. 3340-049B: Border Search of Electronic Devices    URL Source: https://www.cbp.gov/document/directives/cbp-directive-no-3340-049b-border-search-electronic-devices    Published Time: Mon, 25 May 2026 05:17:50 GMT    Markdown Content:  # CBP Directive No. 3340-049B: Border Search of Electronic Devices | U.S. Customs and Border Protection  [Skip to main…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The CBP directive has sparked concerns that the U.S. now mirrors countries like China in requiring &amp;#34;burner&amp;#34; devices for travel to avoid invasive digital searches &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260903&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s wild, I have worked internationally for a long-time and the rule when going to certain countries was bring a burner device. Going to China essentially meant the device was nuked on return to the States, now it is the same feeling to/from the US.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260937&quot; title=&quot;The list of countries where you need a burner phone will likely grow longer. Canada, Australia, UK, some developing countries, etc...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While users debate whether the Supreme Court protects individuals from being compelled to unlock devices, commenters note that non-citizens face immediate visa denial for non-cooperation, while citizens may face indefinite device seizure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48261220&quot; title=&quot;This directive was issued in January of this year, what is relevance of being posted today? I love all the instances where it says, we will not do this or infringe in this way... unless it is a matter of national security, which we don&amp;#39;t have to disclose to you. So basically, do what you want as long as you write it up properly. And this part:          5.3 Review and Handling of Passcode-Protected or Encrypted Information  5.3.1 Travelers are obligated to present electronic devices and the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48261311&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I had thought (and Supreme Court ruled) you could not be compelled to unlock an encrypted device, which is why I always powered mined down before crossing. Does that apply to non-citizens? If a CBP officer doesn&amp;#39;t like you as a non-citizen, like your lack of cooperation during an interview, they could just deny your visa and your entry into the US. If you&amp;#39;re a citizen, they can&amp;#39;t deny your re-entry. They can delay you for however long and ruin your day and even keep your devices, but you get…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48261416&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; I had thought (and Supreme Court ruled) you could not be compelled to unlock an encrypted device &amp;gt;Does that apply to non-citizens? If a CBP officer doesn&amp;#39;t like you as a non-citizen, like your lack of cooperation during an interview, they could just deny your visa and your entry into the US. That&amp;#39;s exactly what &amp;#39;you could not be compelled to unlock an encrypted device&amp;#39; means? You won&amp;#39;t get sent to the gulag for refusing to, but entry into the US was always conditional with very little room…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue this represents significant overreach, especially given CBP’s claimed authority within 100 miles of any border, leading to suggestions for using cloud backups to wipe and restore data during transit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48261035&quot; title=&quot;Someone should make an app to offload all your data to a personal cloud before going to the airport and then reload it into the phone after going through customs&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48261334&quot; title=&quot;A friendly reminder that the CBP has decreed itself to have authority within 100 miles of any US border, as that it is its interpretation of &amp;#39;a reasonable distance&amp;#39; from said border. That basically encompasses two thirds of the population. The last two years have demonstrated a radical need to curtail that range of authority and shift from it being vaguely specified to a concrete legislative specification. Even ten miles seems (pardon the pun) borderline excessive. There is no reason CBP can&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48261135&quot; title=&quot;All backup apps work, no special requirements. Seedvault for my LiniageOS.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://usborne.com/us/books/computer-and-coding-books&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Usborne 1980s Computer Books&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (usborne.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258194&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;172 points · 51 comments · by ngram&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Usborne offers a variety of educational computer and coding books for children, featuring age-appropriate guides on technology, programming, and digital skills. &lt;a href=&quot;https://usborne.com/us/books/computer-and-coding-books&quot; title=&quot;Title: Computer and coding books from Usborne | Usborne | Be Curious    URL Source: https://usborne.com/us/books/computer-and-coding-books    Markdown Content:  # Computer and coding books from Usborne | Usborne | Be Curious    ![Image 2: logo](blob:http://localhost/30cf47401b795665adf44fd024848b36)    [](https://www.cookiebot.com/en/what-is-behind-powered-by-cookiebot/?utm_source=banner_cb&amp;amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;amp;utm_content=v2)    *   [Consent](https://usborne.com/us/books/computer-and-coding-books#)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Usborne computer books are remembered as pivotal educational tools that launched professional careers in software engineering and robotics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258694&quot; title=&quot;If my school&amp;#39;s library had had Machine Code for Beginners, my career might have been very different. (I&amp;#39;m actually a bit annoyed; I didn&amp;#39;t know that existed). I definitely remember Creepy, Battle and Space.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48259395&quot; title=&quot;The &amp;#39;Practice your BASIC&amp;#39; book was in my school library, and in the spring of 1989, I was able to take said book to the computer room at lunch breaks and for a donation of 40p to charity (Cafod, it was a Catholic school), I could do what I wanted on the computers. I learned to code. Most of the other kids played games. That book started a remarkable journey. By 1996 I was at University studying Software Engineering, already proficient in C. Ten years later I was running my own software…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48259196&quot; title=&quot;I knew an adolescent kid (not me) who built the robot from that exact robots book.  A historical thing to appreciate is that, even though this book was unusually prescriptive and nuts&amp;amp;bolts detailed, for the time, building the robot was much harder, and much less likely, than it would be today, even to the same design. This was pre-Web, and it involved mail-order adventures, and you were kinda alone. IIRC, he got the book in the gift shop at the Oregon Museum of Science and Industry, on a…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue for modernizing the series, there is a debate over whether Python is suitable for a printed format due to the difficulty of typing significant whitespace &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258507&quot; title=&quot;Man, I just posted this in a recent thread :-) Still think my comment applies: they need to be updated for a modern platform (not Python).&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258986&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Why not python? It&amp;#39;s pretty simple for kids to understand. Not for the book type format - the kids will be typing the code in, not copying + pasting them. Significant whitespace is a killer in printed form; so Python is not even in the running.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;; others suggest that visual aids like &amp;#34;Tips Kitty&amp;#34; could easily bridge this gap &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260202&quot; title=&quot;[picture of Tips Kitty] Don&amp;#39;t forget! Every time you see &amp;#39;  ⦙  &amp;#39; in the listing, press the [Tab] key on your keyboard. See page 23 to learn why this is important. And page 23 teaches you about significant whitespace, and how to configure several text editors that a kid&amp;#39;s likely to have available to actually show it like that. Heck, I use Panic&amp;#39;s Nova for my text editing and it does that out of the box with no configuration needed.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. These books are credited with providing a structured path into technology during an era when hardware was difficult to source and information was scarce &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258563&quot; title=&quot;These are actually how I first learned to program, but around 2001-2002, when I was about ten years old. I found a couple of them at the library, and that&amp;#39;s when I realized it was something you could just learn...but lacked a BASIC interpreter. I ended up also finding a No Starch Press book on JavaScript, and porting the BASIC listings to ye olde pre-Node JavaScript as my first foray into programming. Then I also got a Commodore 64 on eBay some time later.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48259196&quot; title=&quot;I knew an adolescent kid (not me) who built the robot from that exact robots book.  A historical thing to appreciate is that, even though this book was unusually prescriptive and nuts&amp;amp;bolts detailed, for the time, building the robot was much harder, and much less likely, than it would be today, even to the same design. This was pre-Web, and it involved mail-order adventures, and you were kinda alone. IIRC, he got the book in the gift shop at the Oregon Museum of Science and Industry, on a…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mastering.dyalog.com/README.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mastering Dyalog APL&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mastering.dyalog.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48256475&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;136 points · 36 comments · by tosh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An updated, interactive version of the &amp;#34;Mastering Dyalog APL&amp;#34; book is being developed using Jupyter Notebooks to modernize the 2009 original and reflect the evolution of the programming language. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mastering.dyalog.com/README.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Mastering Dyalog APL — Mastering Dyalog APL    URL Source: https://mastering.dyalog.com/README.html    Published Time: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 12:27:38 GMT    Markdown Content:  Toggle in-page Table of Contents    ## Mastering Dyalog APL[#](https://mastering.dyalog.com/README.html#mastering-dyalog-apl &amp;#39;Permalink to this headline&amp;#39;)    The “[Mastering Dyalog APL](https://www.dyalog.com/mastering-dyalog-apl.htm)” book is the _de facto_ standard for people who are looking to learn Dyalog APL from a book. In…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters debate whether APL is a practical tool for &amp;#34;machine sympathetic&amp;#34; performance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258766&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Turns out most of the time it&amp;#39;s more like a puzzle to get an (often inefficient) terse implementation by torturing some linear algebra operators. solutions in APL can be very efficient if they are written in a machine sympathetic way or in cases where the interpreter can map them onto one for the curious: https://aplwiki.com/wiki/Performance https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6no6N3i9Tg (The Interpretive Advantage) https://ummaycoc.github.io/wc.apl/ (Beating C with Dyalog APL: wc)&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt; or a &amp;#34;puzzle language&amp;#34; that encourages &amp;#34;notation compression&amp;#34; over problem clarity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257679&quot; title=&quot;It always felt strange to me that the main implementation of something as niche and esolang-adjacent as APL is neither OSS nor casually usable commercially, but instead comes under an enterprise license. Anyway, I had a fun time a while ago translating APL programs to NumPy. At some point you get what APL is all about, and you can move on with life without too many regrets. Turns out most of the time it&amp;#39;s more like a puzzle to get an (often inefficient) terse implementation by torturing some…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260584&quot; title=&quot;Agreed. I think I shouldn&amp;#39;t put hard boxes around languages like &amp;#39;puzzle language&amp;#39; vs &amp;#39;abstraction/clear thinking language&amp;#39;. What I was trying to point at was more specific: the way I experience APL thinking tends toward &amp;#39;expression search&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;notation compression&amp;#39;, which feels, to me at least, somewhat at odds with clarity about the underlying problem. More often than not, I seemed to produce an APL-shaped model of the problem rather than a problem-shaped model expressed in a language. When…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that APL&amp;#39;s commercial licensing and terse syntax hinder its modern utility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257679&quot; title=&quot;It always felt strange to me that the main implementation of something as niche and esolang-adjacent as APL is neither OSS nor casually usable commercially, but instead comes under an enterprise license. Anyway, I had a fun time a while ago translating APL programs to NumPy. At some point you get what APL is all about, and you can move on with life without too many regrets. Turns out most of the time it&amp;#39;s more like a puzzle to get an (often inefficient) terse implementation by torturing some…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48260338&quot; title=&quot;In the modern world there is no place for the commercial compiler. They should have made it free (and open source) and only IDE (maybe) paid one. Even better - push into GCC or LLVM.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that deep engagement with the language reveals sophisticated architectural patterns beyond toy examples &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48261551&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; At some point you get what APL is all about, and you can move on with life without too many regrets. Unfortunately, this seems to be a common experience. A lot of smart people only engage with APL via toy puzzles, like you did, and bounce off because that gives no insight about how to use the language in real life. IME, to really start getting APL you need to write and rewrite a full application 20 times. It helps to read code from the masters, too [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]. These all approach…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Disagreements also exist regarding algorithmic efficiency, with one user noting that APL&amp;#39;s immutable arrays make implementing a true $O(N \log \log N)$ prime sieve significantly more difficult than in languages that allow in-place mutation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48262202&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s not O(N log log N), it&amp;#39;s more like N^2. Prime sieves are hard to implement well with immutable arrays for obvious reasons; there are some cool methods but they&amp;#39;re definitely harder. I&amp;#39;m ashamed to be part of a community that won&amp;#39;t cop to this. The algorithm iterates over numbers ⍺ from 2 to N, removing the multiples that are greater than ⍺ and no greater than N from p. If the removal with ~ has to inspect all of p, then all the primes are there so we have asymptotically at least N/log N…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-alexander-grothendieck-revolutionized-20th-century-mathematics-20260520/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Alexander Grothendieck Revolutionized 20th-Century Mathematics&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (quantamagazine.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48254020&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;135 points · 31 comments · by anujbans&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alexander Grothendieck revolutionized 20th-century mathematics by introducing &amp;#34;schemes,&amp;#34; a radical framework that shifted the focus of algebraic geometry from individual points to hidden structures and relationships, effectively unifying the field with number theory, topology, and logic. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-alexander-grothendieck-revolutionized-20th-century-mathematics-20260520/&quot; title=&quot;How Alexander Grothendieck Revolutionized 20th-Century Mathematics | Quanta Magazine    Grothendieck is revered in the world of math; outside of it, he’s known for his unusual life, if he’s known at all. But what were his actual mathematical contributions?    [Quanta Homepage](/)    * [Physics](https://www.quantamagazine.org/./physics/)  * [Mathematics](https://www.quantamagazine.org/./mathematics/)  * [Biology](https://www.quantamagazine.org/./biology/)  * [Computer…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the &amp;#34;Grothendieck prime&amp;#34; (57), a famous anecdote illustrating the mathematician&amp;#39;s preference for abstract structures over concrete examples &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48254934&quot; title=&quot;One of my favourite Grothendieck stories from &amp;lt; https://www.ams.org/notices/200410/fea-grothendieck-part2.pd... &amp;gt;: &amp;gt; One striking characteristic of Grothendieck&amp;#39;s mode of thinking is that it seemed to rely so little on examples. This can be seen in the legend of the so-called &amp;#39;Grothendieck prime&amp;#39;. In a mathematical conversation, someone suggested to Grothendieck that they should consider a particular prime number. &amp;#39;You mean an actual number?&amp;#39; Grothendieck asked. The other person replied, yes,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48255675&quot; title=&quot;I had to follow your link to get it: I hadn&amp;#39;t realized that 57 is not prime. At least I&amp;#39;m in good company.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users debated the simplicity of identifying 57 as composite &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48255916&quot; title=&quot;It looks like a prime, but can be caught with the second-simplest test: sum of the digits is 12, which is divisible by 3. Hence it&amp;#39;s divisible by 3. (The simplest test being of course if the number is even and bigger than 2) Edit: now that I think about it, probably should not have tried to impose ordering to the simplicity of tests. There&amp;#39;s of course the divisibility by 5 test, which is even simpler.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48259328&quot; title=&quot;I just noticed that it&amp;#39;s 60-3 without any divisibility tests. Tao&amp;#39;s 27 prime was much more embarassing but understandable as he&amp;#39;s no a calculator. Savants are for things like remembering the first million primes. Someone like Tao or Grothendieck can&amp;#39;t remeber them beyond 20, but it doesn&amp;#39;t mean they can&amp;#39;t actuly reason about them.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others noted that even modern geniuses like Terence Tao have made similar errors with numbers like 27 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48259328&quot; title=&quot;I just noticed that it&amp;#39;s 60-3 without any divisibility tests. Tao&amp;#39;s 27 prime was much more embarassing but understandable as he&amp;#39;s no a calculator. Savants are for things like remembering the first million primes. Someone like Tao or Grothendieck can&amp;#39;t remeber them beyond 20, but it doesn&amp;#39;t mean they can&amp;#39;t actuly reason about them.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. The thread also explores Grothendieck’s eccentricities, including his specific recipe for kimchi &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48256817&quot; title=&quot;For anyone interested in Grothendieck&amp;#39;s opinions on kimchi … https://mikepierce.github.io/grothendieck-kimchi/translation...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257114&quot; title=&quot;all mention of aekjeot (fish sauce) and saeujeot (tiny shrimp) seems to be elided here. kimchi in coastal regions (and most commercialized korean kimchi) has a strong tendency to have that in, so if you take grothendieck&amp;#39;s recipe as is, you won&amp;#39;t have the exported korean taste. northern kimchis have diverged materially in addition, due to north korea being fucked up. aekjeot you can just add but the procedure to add saeujeot traditionally is pretty fiddly he mentions using whatever herbs he had…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt; and the accuracy of Benjamin Labatut’s fictionalized portrayal of his life &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48254559&quot; title=&quot;Happy to see that it&amp;#39;s got the obligatory monk/wizard photo. For more life and times  stuff I also suggest Labatut&amp;#39;s Cease to Understand the World book and https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/konstantinos-foutzop...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48254804&quot; title=&quot;That book is fiction with a factual veneer.  I liked it a lot until I started realizing that many of the details were made up.  Then I couldn&amp;#39;t read any more.  It was like when TwoSetViolin described what it was like for them to watch movies with musician characters played, unrealistically, by non-musician actors.  You&amp;#39;d be watching the perfectly fine movie until you noticed that the bananas were blue instead of yellow, with nobody mentioning it.  After that the movie made no sense any more. I…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48254928&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; That book is fiction with a factual veneer. Definitely, but do check the link.. I dug it up originally by trying to track down detail about the nonfiction background that the book is pulling from.  Seems like the best short source, but I&amp;#39;d love to hear recs for a good biography.  The autobiography that Groth is careful to say is not an autobiography is on my shelf and also in pdf form.  Haven&amp;#39;t read it yet, but I&amp;#39;m not sure it&amp;#39;s  the type of thing that&amp;#39;s going to cover the descent into…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-23</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-23</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://reclaimthenet.org/texas-woman-arrested-for-facebook-post-about-town-water-quality&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Texas woman arrested for Facebook post about town water quality&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (reclaimthenet.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48249747&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;771 points · 317 comments · by abawany&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Texas woman was arrested and charged with a felony for &amp;#34;tampering with a government record&amp;#34; after she posted a warning on Facebook about the potential poor quality of her town&amp;#39;s water supply. &lt;a href=&quot;https://reclaimthenet.org/texas-woman-arrested-for-facebook-post-about-town-water-quality&quot; title=&quot;Title: Just a moment...    URL Source: https://reclaimthenet.org/texas-woman-arrested-for-facebook-post-about-town-water-quality    Warning: Target URL returned error 403: Forbidden  Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.    Markdown Content:  Enable JavaScript and cookies to continue&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that the arrest was a deliberate act of intimidation intended to silence whistleblowers through legal and personal inconvenience, even if the charges are eventually dropped &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48250924&quot; title=&quot;The point of the arrest was not to win. The point was to inconvenience the whistleblower, cause her grief, and maybe as a bonus make her spend a night or two in jail. Nobody doing this remotely believed that they wouldn&amp;#39;t have to settle. They did it to show that if you speak out against them, they&amp;#39;ll arrest and inconvenience you. So the next person who gets a thought to speak out might decide not to bother. Same for the guy in TN who got arrested for posting that anti-conservative meme. Nobody…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48250996&quot; title=&quot;Yea, an arrest on your record, even if you&amp;#39;re acquitted and/or get a settlement for police wrongdoing, can still mess you up. There are employers and landlords who will ask you / check whether you were ever arrested, regardless of the outcome of the arrest . Mere involvement with Law Enforcement puts a permanent black mark on your record and can interfere with basic things for the rest of your life.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate whether the prospect of a settlement payout might actually encourage others to speak out &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48250973&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; They did it to show that if you speak out against them, they&amp;#39;ll arrest and inconvenience you. So the next person who gets a thought to speak out might decide not to bother. some of my students have expressed that they wish they could get arrested for a meme and walk away with a couple hundred grand. i, of course, have told them that they would be playing with fire. but they are still viewing it as a potentially life-changing payday. so, for some subset of people, they might be having to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, there is a strong consensus that the financial burden of these lawsuits falls on taxpayers rather than the officials responsible &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48250008&quot; title=&quot;I assume she will get a settlement, the city (the taxpayer) will pay for it and nothing else changes. There will be even less money for infrastructure repair and people will keep voting for the same people.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48250023&quot; title=&quot;The craziest part is the police defending this action as a “cut and dry” case. Meanwhile the lawsuit this woman just filed will hurt taxpayers and not the corrupt city officials and police that caused this. We need to ban all forms of immunity - none for cops, politicians, or judges. They need to be personally liable for their actions.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. This has led to a sharp disagreement over &amp;#34;qualified immunity,&amp;#34; with some calling for its total abolition to ensure personal liability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48250439&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not a lawyer, but I think qualified immunity should not apply to constitutional violations. Giving an opt-out for those violations is antithetical to the very substance of our (US) constitution.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48250023&quot; title=&quot;The craziest part is the police defending this action as a “cut and dry” case. Meanwhile the lawsuit this woman just filed will hurt taxpayers and not the corrupt city officials and police that caused this. We need to ban all forms of immunity - none for cops, politicians, or judges. They need to be personally liable for their actions.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48250533&quot; title=&quot;Qualified Immunity should not apply ever. Period. No one should be above the law for any reason ever.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, while others argue the concept is necessary but currently suffers from an overly broad legal interpretation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48250623&quot; title=&quot;Let&amp;#39;s not throw out the baby with the bathwater. Qualified immunity, as a concept, makes perfect sense. Police officers are not jurists, and they will make mistakes in enforcing the law. Making those officers personally liable for honest mistakes is, IMO, excessive. The issue isn&amp;#39;t qualified immunity itself, but rather the maximalist interpretation that seems pervasive in the US justice system, and the overwhelmingly broad definition of &amp;#39;honest mistake&amp;#39; that seemingly applies to the police, and…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://veronicaexplains.net/my-first-writerdeck/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Time to talk about my writerdeck&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (veronicaexplains.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48250144&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;472 points · 280 comments · by hggh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To combat digital distractions, the author converted an old System76 laptop into a &amp;#34;writerdeck&amp;#34; by installing a minimal, text-only Debian Linux environment that boots directly into Neovim and Tmux for a focused, browser-free writing experience. &lt;a href=&quot;https://veronicaexplains.net/my-first-writerdeck/&quot; title=&quot;Title: It&amp;#39;s time to talk about my writerdeck    URL Source: https://veronicaexplains.net/my-first-writerdeck/    Published Time: 2026-05-23T15:45:57.000Z    Markdown Content:  I have an attention problem.    A couple of weeks ago, I decided to convert my old laptop into a [writerdeck](https://www.writerdeck.org/?ref=veronicaexplains.net), a dedicated writing device free from the distractions of the modern internet.    Lots of folks build really elaborate offline devices for this, and I&amp;#39;d love to do…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a tension between the desire for a distraction-free writing environment and the tendency to procrastinate through &amp;#34;productive&amp;#34; over-engineering, such as building custom OS stacks or static site generators &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48251101&quot; title=&quot;This is an awesome setup. I like it, good job. That said, I do think there&amp;#39;s a bit of irony to solving your &amp;#39;paying attention to writing&amp;#39; problem by setting up your OS from scratch, choosing to swap out the default networking stack, installing a novel flavor of your preferred text editor because you&amp;#39;re &amp;#39;trying to get to know it a bit more,&amp;#39; customizing your battery readouts, tweaking the login sequence, and then, after all that effort to make sure you&amp;#39;d have the perfect environment for…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48251409&quot; title=&quot;It it reminds me of a lot of friends who wanted to &amp;#39;start blogging&amp;#39; and their first step was writing a new static site system from scratch.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48251524&quot; title=&quot;This reads like someone with ADHD took Adderall and accidentally focused hard for a day on the wrong thing. It has happened to me. I guess if this writerdeck works persistently for many projects then fine. But if every 2 projects the writerdeck gets revamped then it seems like a way to get a dopamine hit or distract ones self. Nothing wrong with that, but it doesn&amp;#39;t seem like it&amp;#39;s a net benefit in terms of focus.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users seek the perfect e-ink hardware to facilitate focus &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48250562&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m desperately awaiting the perfect eink device for this. I&amp;#39;ve got a great writing setup on Obsidian that really works for me, a royal kludge mechanical keyboard...just waiting on the next gen of eink The Boox One Note Max was sooo close, but they almost immediately discontinued the product and probably won&amp;#39;t be supporting it long. Suggestions are welcome&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48250641&quot; title=&quot;I use the Onyx Boox Palma for a portable eink drafting setup. It&amp;#39;s worked pretty well. I wrote about it here: https://liza.io/portable-writing-setup-with-onyx-boox-palma/&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that true simplicity is only found in analog tools like pen and paper &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48251328&quot; title=&quot;I went with paper and pen precisely because there was always more I wanted to do with my computer work flow.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48251382&quot; title=&quot;Pen and paper for writing. Computer for editing.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt; or by simply using a basic Linux TTY console &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48251139&quot; title=&quot;If anyone wants to try this without the intricate setup, if you have a linux system, you most probably can just press Ctrl+Alt+F3 and drop into a tty console directly. To return, you have to press Ctrl+Alt+F1 or Ctrl+Alt+F2. You also have multiple consoles, up until F12 probably. I used to use this a lot when trying for a less distracting desktop, just like in the original post.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics suggest these elaborate setups may be internalizations of broader societal anxieties or symptoms of ADHD-driven hyperfocus on the wrong tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48250728&quot; title=&quot;The way people are coping with the current hellscape that is 2026 is interesting to me. Somehow, it always seems to be internalization. Like, if only I can lock in using this distraction free method, if only I start buying more physical media, if only I use a dumb phone and an mp3 player for my music, etc. etc., somehow that will resolve the intractable shitstorm happening right now. And none of that is even going to be a drop in the ocean in terms of making your life better. Only collective…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48251524&quot; title=&quot;This reads like someone with ADHD took Adderall and accidentally focused hard for a day on the wrong thing. It has happened to me. I guess if this writerdeck works persistently for many projects then fine. But if every 2 projects the writerdeck gets revamped then it seems like a way to get a dopamine hit or distract ones self. Nothing wrong with that, but it doesn&amp;#39;t seem like it&amp;#39;s a net benefit in terms of focus.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, though others defend the process as a valid personal pursuit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48251640&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; focused hard for a day on the wrong thing Entirely depends on what the author wanted to focus on. Who are we to say what is the right or wrong thing to focus on?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kk.org/cooltools/book-freak-210-the-art-of-money-getting/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Art of Money Getting&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (kk.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247208&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;387 points · 218 comments · by dxs&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;P.T. Barnum’s 1880 book, *The Art of Money Getting*, outlines 20 essential rules for financial success, emphasizing the importance of choosing the right vocation, avoiding debt, working with total dedication, and maintaining personal integrity to build a lasting reputation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kk.org/cooltools/book-freak-210-the-art-of-money-getting/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Art of Money Getting – Cool Tools    URL Source: https://kk.org/cooltools/book-freak-210-the-art-of-money-getting/    Published Time: Sat, 23 May 2026 20:00:15 GMT    Markdown Content:  [Tips](https://kk.org/cooltools/category/tips/)    ## Book Freak #210: The Art of Money Getting    ### P.T. Barnum&amp;#39;s Golden Rules for Making Money    [![Image 1](https://kk.org/cooltools/files/2026/05/TheArtOfMoneyGetting.jpg)](https://kk.org/cooltools/files/2026/05/TheArtOfMoneyGetting.jpg)  [Get The Art of Money…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the importance of professional integrity and finding work that aligns with one&amp;#39;s natural aptitude, a principle echoed by both P.T. Barnum and Edsger Dijkstra &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248760&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; They take whatever job pays and spend decades fighting upstream. I suspect that this affects a lot of folks in tech. There&amp;#39;s a lot of money to be made, so people get into it. They don&amp;#39;t really like what they do, so it&amp;#39;s always a chore. Their work often shows it, too. I&amp;#39;m retired. I don&amp;#39;t have to write software, but I spend more time writing software (for free), than I did, for most of my career. I like the Integrity part, too. That seems to be something that&amp;#39;s missing (from most vocations),…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48249524&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; and that&amp;#39;s pretty important to me The older I get, the more I realize what a critical component of personal and social relationships it is, and how deeply it reinforces virtually everything good in society. There&amp;#39;s never a good reason to forgo it, and never a good reason to accept spending time with people who don&amp;#39;t have it. It only leads to trouble. I started my career in ad tech and it was often such abject misery because of this. I couldn&amp;#39;t put my finger on it at the time, but a large part…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48249007&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Barnum’s first rule: pick the work you’re built for, then aim to be the best at it. Edsger Dijkstra, in one of his letters, giving advice (IIRC) to a PhD student: &amp;#39;Do only what only you can do.&amp;#39; Kind of funny to see one of the greatest computer scientists and one of the greatest public entertainers giving the same advice, but I guess that speaks strongly in its favor.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some retirees find renewed joy in software development by using LLMs as &amp;#34;trusted advisors&amp;#34; to increase velocity, others argue that AI-assisted coding lacks the &amp;#34;joy&amp;#34; of learning and results in a shallow understanding of the work &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48249238&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I&amp;#39;m retired. I don&amp;#39;t have to write software, but I spend more time writing software (for free), than I did, for most of my career. Same. Claude/Gemini/DeepSeekV4/Qwen3.6 are enabling me to do way more experimentation than I could do on my own. 10X at least. Not getting paid for any of it, but that&amp;#39;s OK, getting paid imposes limitations on what you can work on and imposes responsibilities that I don&amp;#39;t care to have anymore. There&amp;#39;s a certain kind of integrity in that as well.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48249357&quot; title=&quot;Do you find joy in using LLMs to write software? I tried using Claude/Cursor/CodeX/etc. for personal projects and experimentation, and I found no joy in it. I learned nothing, and when my MVPs were complete, I only had a shallow understanding of how the code that powered them worked.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48249759&quot; title=&quot;I do, but I also use LLMs in a manner that seems drastically different, from most folks here. I use the standard $20/ChatGPT Pro sub, and run Thinking 5.5 as a chat interface. I use it like a &amp;#39;trusted personal advisor,&amp;#39; as opposed to a &amp;#39;black box employee.&amp;#39; I&amp;#39;m intimately involved in almost every step of the development process. Most of what I ask from the LLM, is function-length snippets. It&amp;#39;s made a huge difference in the velocity and scope of my work. I have learned that I need to be very…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Identifying the &amp;#34;best fit&amp;#34; for a career remains a challenge, with suggestions ranging from using the &amp;#34;Big 5&amp;#34; personality traits to seeking environments where personal values aren&amp;#39;t compromised for profit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248673&quot; title=&quot;The hardest thing is to know what&amp;#39;s your best fit. Any advice?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48249524&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; and that&amp;#39;s pretty important to me The older I get, the more I realize what a critical component of personal and social relationships it is, and how deeply it reinforces virtually everything good in society. There&amp;#39;s never a good reason to forgo it, and never a good reason to accept spending time with people who don&amp;#39;t have it. It only leads to trouble. I started my career in ad tech and it was often such abject misery because of this. I couldn&amp;#39;t put my finger on it at the time, but a large part…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248688&quot; title=&quot;A lot of pop-psychology doesn&amp;#39;t hold up when subject to empirical review, but OCEAN / &amp;#39;Big 5&amp;#39; does, and it&amp;#39;s probably a decent starting point. E.g. if you are low in extraversion and agreeableness, you probably wouldn&amp;#39;t make a good nurse or waiter, but you might not make a bad lawyer or engineer.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/josefprusa/status/2054602354851254330&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;BambuStudio has been violating PrusaSlicer AGPL license since their fork&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48245862&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;403 points · 162 comments · by Tomte&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Prusa Research founder Josef Prusa alleges that Bambu Lab’s BambuStudio software has been violating the AGPL license of PrusaSlicer since the project was first forked. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/josefprusa/status/2054602354851254330&quot; title=&quot;# JavaScript is not available.    We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using x.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.    [Help Center](https://help.x.com/using-x/x-supported-browsers)    [Terms of Service](https://x.com/tos)  [Privacy Policy](https://x.com/privacy)  [Cookie Policy](https://support.x.com/articles/20170514)  [Imprint](https://legal.twitter.com/imprint.html)  [Ads…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on Bambu Lab&amp;#39;s alleged license violations and data privacy concerns, with some users arguing that the company&amp;#39;s closed-ecosystem approach alienates the core enthusiast market &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246912&quot; title=&quot;I use my printer to make prototypes for my business. There is no way in hell I&amp;#39;m sending them into the internet for some random to examine. I think my next printer will be mostly 3D printed, with a few generic parts like motor controllers, the odd bit of metal tubing, off the shelf bed levelling system, open source software etc. I only need single colour prints for work, and AFAIK the fastest printer on the planet is mostly 3D printed, I&amp;#39;d start with that one as a base and adapt it for my…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48249199&quot; title=&quot;3D printing is still very much an enthusiast, techie driver market.  The degree to which Bambu has done their best to alienate that market is beyond astonishing. I really like Bambu&amp;#39;s machines.  Their quality and prices are both excellent.  But they no longer have an edge feature and speed wise.  I can get pretty much the same product from Creality, so why would I even entertain a user-hostile company like Bambu?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some attribute these violations to a &amp;#34;cultural impedance mismatch&amp;#34; regarding open-source expectations in China &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246837&quot; title=&quot;Not everything that a Chinese company does is for nefarious reason or under the hidden agenda of the Chinese government. The reality is much more mundane: many Chinese companies do not understand the expectations around open source. There isn’t anything really equivalent in China. The closest mindset is that things that are available to use, are available to take. The notion of copyright -while not inexistent- is not really a basic cultural notion. Even more so, not caring about ownership, and…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others worry about the potential for industrial or military espionage through cloud-synced 3D models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246695&quot; title=&quot;I can&amp;#39;t help but wonder how could, Bambulabs or the Chinese government, actually mine that data? In my mind, 3D models fail into two categories: artistic and utilitarian, though there&amp;#39;s a continuum between those two. With the artistic side, the Chinese government could find itself in possession of tons and tons of Western miniatures. With the utilitarian side, they will find themselves in possession of lots and lots of random parts with no way to know what they are for. Of course, there&amp;#39;s no…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246760&quot; title=&quot;I was curious about this as well. Hypothetically, if they are really trying to extract insight, they could be: - Industrial trend pattern: even if only people accidentally leave the Cloud Feature on initially, there could be some that slip through. It could be product categories way before the public knows about it. - Defence and aerospace: obviously less likely, but if people use Strava in odd locations, and people share classified defence info on War Thunder, then it wouldn’t surprise me if…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a notable disagreement over whether these actions are intentionally malicious or simply a byproduct of a different regulatory and competitive environment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246837&quot; title=&quot;Not everything that a Chinese company does is for nefarious reason or under the hidden agenda of the Chinese government. The reality is much more mundane: many Chinese companies do not understand the expectations around open source. There isn’t anything really equivalent in China. The closest mindset is that things that are available to use, are available to take. The notion of copyright -while not inexistent- is not really a basic cultural notion. Even more so, not caring about ownership, and…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246992&quot; title=&quot;In general, the PRC government will install local politically connected members into advisor roles in almost all large companies.  It is something a lot of businesses simply have no control over in that country, or in the US for that matter. The locked ecosystem posture is simply because with a billion people a firm of any size always has irrational competitors/cloners.  Sometimes the governments national policy aligns with a firm, but the support always comes at a price for every business…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247773&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t like all this shaming on social media. It feels performative and leaves a bad taste in my mouth. If they&amp;#39;re in violation of your copyright agreements, sue them. If you can&amp;#39;t sue them because it&amp;#39;s unenforceable, well, that sucks, but too bad. I don&amp;#39;t know what they expect to happen here. Is there even a clear call to action? Boycott? Do something .&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://benmyers.dev/blog/on-the-dl/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;On The &amp;lt;dl&amp;gt; (2021)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (benmyers.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247325&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;437 points · 125 comments · by ravenical&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The HTML `&amp;amp;lt;dl&amp;amp;gt;` element provides a semantic way to mark up name-value pairs, offering improved accessibility for screen readers compared to generic `&amp;amp;lt;div&amp;amp;gt;` tags. By using `&amp;amp;lt;dt&amp;amp;gt;` for terms and `&amp;amp;lt;dd&amp;amp;gt;` for details, developers can create versatile, structured lists for everything from book metadata to complex data blocks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://benmyers.dev/blog/on-the-dl/&quot; title=&quot;Title: On the &amp;lt;dl&amp;gt;    URL Source: https://benmyers.dev/blog/on-the-dl/    Published Time: 2021-08-06T00:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  ## Introduction    [](https://benmyers.dev/blog/on-the-dl/#introduction)  The `&amp;lt;dl&amp;gt;`, or _description list_, element is underrated.    It’s used to represent a **list of name–value pairs**. This is a common UI pattern that, at the same time, is _incredibly_ versatile. For instance, you’ve probably seen these layouts out in the wild…    Each of these examples shows a list…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users appreciate the `&amp;amp;lt;dl&amp;amp;gt;` tag as a cleaner alternative to complex table markup &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248050&quot; title=&quot;I love DL. I think tables, at least in the past, were misused as DLs even more in the past and the inconvenience of the table markup is even worse than a bunch of divs.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248224&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not that inconvenient if you omit unnecessary closing tags: first second what ever I find it simpler and cleaner than any of the markdown table markups&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that semantic HTML is poorly designed and lacks the flexibility needed for real-world data models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48249010&quot; title=&quot;This is going to be unpopular here, but life became easier when I quit trying to write semantic HTML. It’s just poorly designed, I’m sorry. Every time I’ve reached for a I’ve eventually regretted it because I wanted multiple levels of wrappers, or a divider between sections, or an icon, or a heading spanning multiple key-value pairs, etc. They make this stuff with some flexibility but nowhere near enough to actually cover the generalized concept it purports to. I still use the corresponding…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248331&quot; title=&quot;The tag seems to cover a subset of a broad semantic space, but doesn’t easily extend beyond adding another . I dunno, I guess I’m a caveman. If it looks right and works (including accessibility) then I figure I’m pursuing something that doesn’t matter a lot.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical discussions highlight that `&amp;amp;lt;dl&amp;amp;gt;` represents &amp;#34;name-value groups&amp;#34; rather than simple pairs, though proper implementation requires careful attention to ARIA roles and nesting rules &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248285&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This is incorrect: 1. has no corresponding ( viz. implicit) role, but can be given the role group, list, none or presentation &amp;lt; https://w3c.github.io/html-aria/#el-dl &amp;gt;. 2. You’re only allowed to define aria-label on elements that have a compatible role, implicit or explicit &amp;lt; https://w3c.github.io/html-aria/#docconformance-naming &amp;gt;. 3. aria-label is allowed on all but a handful of roles &amp;lt; https://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-1.2/#aria-label &amp;gt;, which in this case knocks out presentation and none,…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247691&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m curious if the spec actually says you can only wrap it with a div because I like to do semantic html and name my elements specific to my domain.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, there is a divide between those who prioritize strict semantic meaning and those who favor practical, &amp;#34;good enough&amp;#34; solutions that prioritize visual results and basic accessibility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48249010&quot; title=&quot;This is going to be unpopular here, but life became easier when I quit trying to write semantic HTML. It’s just poorly designed, I’m sorry. Every time I’ve reached for a I’ve eventually regretted it because I wanted multiple levels of wrappers, or a divider between sections, or an icon, or a heading spanning multiple key-value pairs, etc. They make this stuff with some flexibility but nowhere near enough to actually cover the generalized concept it purports to. I still use the corresponding…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48250201&quot; title=&quot;Eh, it&amp;#39;s fine, elements should be defined for what they mean, not what they look like. The explanation and distinctions made between and other elements ( , , ) make sense. The suggested (not obligatory) user agent styling for is `font-weight: bolder` an agent or authors could use lots of different things to bring attention to what the element contains and treat it differently from . https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/text-level-semantics....…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248331&quot; title=&quot;The tag seems to cover a subset of a broad semantic space, but doesn’t easily extend beyond adding another . I dunno, I guess I’m a caveman. If it looks right and works (including accessibility) then I figure I’m pursuing something that doesn’t matter a lot.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mahl.me/blog/the-spell-that-wouldnt-leave/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I Miss Terry Pratchett&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mahl.me)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247127&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;235 points · 243 comments · by gorgmah&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author reflects on the enduring impact of Sir Terry Pratchett’s writing, recalling how the author&amp;#39;s humorous, subversive, and intellectually respectful fantasy novels served as a vital &amp;#34;on-ramp&amp;#34; to reading for teenagers and left behind a legacy of unforgettable ideas that continue to resonate years after his death. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mahl.me/blog/the-spell-that-wouldnt-leave/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The spell that wouldn&amp;#39;t leave · mahl.me    URL Source: https://www.mahl.me/blog/the-spell-that-wouldnt-leave/    Markdown Content:  There is a theory, not necessarily a really good theory, but a theory nevertheless, that all memories are a kind of furniture in the head. The good ones are armchairs. The painful ones are filing cabinets, usually full. And then there are the memories that are neither: the ones that arrive uninvited, settle in, and start terrorising the other occupants by kicking…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion is sharply divided over whether the article was written by AI, with some users mocking specific phrases as &amp;#34;nonsensical&amp;#34; &amp;#34;AI slop&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247677&quot; title=&quot;How to get your AI company&amp;#39;s blog to No. 1 on Hacker News: 1. Pick an author nerds like. 2. Tell Claude &amp;#39;Write an article about Terry Pratchett, in his style.&amp;#39; 3. Don&amp;#39;t even fix the faux-witty phrases that, upon closer inspection, make zero sense, like &amp;#39;Sir Terry Pratchett, who knew more about furniture than most&amp;#39;, or &amp;#39;Most physics departments would settle for that.&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;The Author, refusing to let the Narrator off the hook&amp;#39;. 4. Bask in the praise for your wonderful writing.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247945&quot; title=&quot;The book has to be small enough to disappear when a teacher looks up. Pocket editions, as their name suggests, were engineered for this. Pratchett’s were small, fat, slightly battered, and printed on a kind of paper that already looked guilty. Pratchett&amp;#39;s Pocket editions were slightly battered? Pre-sale, even? Not only does the paper &amp;#39;look guilty&amp;#39;, but it&amp;#39;s doing so &amp;#39;already&amp;#39;? As if guilty paper is normal, but not on THIS time scale. It&amp;#39;s nonsensical; even bad writers don&amp;#39;t end up with stuff…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, while others defend the prose as a successful homage to Pratchett’s style that requires better reading comprehension to appreciate &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247878&quot; title=&quot;This was not AI, or at least was only proofread/edited by AI. More importantly, both of those sentences make complete sense in context, and neither is phrased in a way that AI would. They are phrased in the way that Terry Pratchet would have. Have you never read him? This new trend of pointing out that everything you dont understand is AI has become a flashing warning sign about our declining literacy rates. Literacy is in serious trouble, and worse it has effected the way humans THINK. We are…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248362&quot; title=&quot;It seems reading comprehension is also declining: Furniture is established as an image for memories just a few lines earlier. And the quote directly afterwards is framed precisely in this image.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. This debate was largely settled by a confirmation that the AI model Claude was indeed involved in the writing process &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248381&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s confirmed that Claude was involved: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247127#48248070&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond the authorship controversy, commenters shared poignant anecdotes about how Pratchett’s work fostered kindness and a deeper understanding of human nature &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247262&quot; title=&quot;What a beautifully written article. &amp;gt; What I miss, selfishly, is the next book. There were always going to be more. &amp;gt; What I miss, less selfishly, is whatever Pratchett-shaped object is supposed to be reaching teenagers now, and isn’t. I feel the first keenly. I have put off a re-read of Pratchett for several years now: I want to forget as much as possible, to have the pleasure of discovery again. But I have read them all so many times I know it will all be familiar. I don&amp;#39;t know what teenagers…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, while lamenting that AI may discourage future authors from creating similar &amp;#34;Discworlds&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247781&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, I miss Terry Pratchett too, but what I miss even most is reading an article and not wondering how much of it was written by AI. Imagine if Terry Pratchett was born in the 2000&amp;#39;s and wrote in the 2020&amp;#39;s. Well, he wouldn&amp;#39;t. That&amp;#39;s the thing. Imagine all the future Discworlds we&amp;#39;ll never read because nobody ever writes anything anymore, because they&amp;#39;ve given up, and even if they did write there&amp;#39;s so few chances to publish anyway, even before AI. When there is clearly a huge demand for great…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://isaiprofitable.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Is AI Profitable Yet?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (isaiprofitable.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243863&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;259 points · 201 comments · by poyu&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Frontier AI companies have collectively spent $1.4 trillion against $613 billion in revenue, leaving the industry largely unprofitable with the notable exception of Nvidia, which has earned $253 billion in profit as a primary chip supplier. &lt;a href=&quot;https://isaiprofitable.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Is AI Profitable Yet?    URL Source: https://isaiprofitable.com/    Markdown Content:  ## Is AI    Profitable    Yet?    Tracking the spend and revenue of frontier AI companies (May 2026).    ## NO.    Everyone&amp;#39;s Broke.    $1.4T    Total Industry Spend    $613B    Total Industry Revenue    $0    $ Spent on AI since page load    COMPANY    • TOTAL SPEND ON AI• TOTAL REVENUE FROM AI    CUMULATIVE PNL    ![Image 1: Amazon logo](blob:http://localhost/2486870dfb6ee7c94a9eeb525c787e9f)    Amazon    Full AI capex est. since…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate centers on whether AI&amp;#39;s current lack of profitability is a standard startup growth phase or a unique systemic risk, given that the scale of investment is large enough to impact the US GDP &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48244180&quot; title=&quot;It’s weird to me that people here suddenly seem to care about profitability for relatively early stage companies just because they’re “AI”. I know a traditional SaaS company I worked for that IPO’d years ago and still has no signs that they can be profitable (and many others like it) and nobody seems particularly concerned.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48244255&quot; title=&quot;These companies are spending more money than budgets of many countries enough to add 2+% to the US GDP so the amount of loss for if it comes all crashing down will be huge.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48244366&quot; title=&quot;We go through this with every startup cycle. Startups are not expected to be profitable because they’re spending so much money on growth and R&amp;amp;D. The concept of running a business in an intentionally unprofitable state is confusing to those who don’t understand startup funding. The weird thing is that so many people believe that inference is unprofitable. There are large open weights models that companies run at a profit while charging far less than what OpenAI and Anthropic charge. Deepseek V4…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users argue that &amp;#34;shell game&amp;#34; accounting between AI firms and cloud providers—where compute credits are traded for equity—masks a lack of real-dollar revenue from outside customers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48244211&quot; title=&quot;AMD, Alibaba should be on there too. AMD is making good money on AI, with R&amp;amp;D at less than half the AI revenue. Whereas Alibaba&amp;#39;s weird financials show it&amp;#39;s kinda-sorta-protifable? I just wanna know how the OpenAI/Anthropic shell game works long-term. So both companies made equity deals with infrastructure providers; OpenAI on Azure, Anthropic on AWS, GCloud, and Colossus. They get a loan of compute credits and then pay for the compute with the credits. So the PaaS are effectively giving them…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48244084&quot; title=&quot;Now use common accounting standard and amortize the cost. Oh it doesn&amp;#39;t fit the narrative. Never mind then.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some believe the economy can absorb a potential crash because the capital has already been redistributed to employees and suppliers, others warn that the massive misallocation of physical resources like power and infrastructure could cause significant economic ripples &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48244349&quot; title=&quot;if these companies go bankrupt, they will have spent (not lost) all their money, the large amounts of money that they got from investors. That money generated profits  for other companies they bought stuff from, and income for their employees, and capital gains for other people if AIco acquired other companies. the market cap of a company is computed by the current price of a company&amp;#39;s shares, the last price paid; not all the shares of the company were bought at that price, the ones who got…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48244204&quot; title=&quot;These companies are blowing through an incomparable amount of resources. If their bravado is misplaced, the economic impacts will be far more significant.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48244531&quot; title=&quot;That’s an overly simplified model.  AI companies spending results in infrastructure beyond the company such as manufacturing capacity, power lines, software systems, and even individual expertise. If they fail then the negative impact ripples through the economy due to misallocation of resources.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://this.weekinsecurity.com/oura-says-it-gets-government-demands-for-user-data-will-it-share-how-many/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Oura says it gets government demands for user data&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (this.weekinsecurity.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247876&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;290 points · 157 comments · by donohoe&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Health wearable maker Oura has confirmed it receives government demands for user data but has yet to release a transparency report or specify how often it complies with these requests. &lt;a href=&quot;https://this.weekinsecurity.com/oura-says-it-gets-government-demands-for-user-data-will-it-share-how-many/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Oura says it gets government demands for user data. Will it share how many?    URL Source: https://this.weekinsecurity.com/oura-says-it-gets-government-demands-for-user-data-will-it-share-how-many/    Published Time: 2026-05-23T12:34:51.000Z    Markdown Content:  Last year, health wearable maker Oura became embroiled in [a social media shitstorm](https://ouraring.com/blog/oura-us-department-of-defense/) after inking a deal with the Department of Defense and Palantir. Some customers feared their…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are skeptical about the utility of biometric data for government surveillance, noting that authorities already have easier access to location and communication data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248850&quot; title=&quot;What will the government even do with my heart rate and blood oxygen data? &amp;#39;Mr Smith has been running again, we better bring him in for questioning!&amp;#39; Edit: to be clear, the government is requesting the data, so clearly they&amp;#39;re doing something with it... But what? I don&amp;#39;t see it!&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248413&quot; title=&quot;Oura doesn&amp;#39;t even have GPS does it? Government can already get ALL your celltower locations without a warrant AND read all your emails and text messages that are over 6 months old, without a warrant&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion highlights a lack of clarity regarding Oura&amp;#39;s security architecture, specifically whether the data is truly encrypted at rest or merely encrypted in transit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248262&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;In my previous blog, I revealed that Oura data is not end-to-end encrypted. That means that an Oura user&amp;#39;s health data can be unscrambled at certain points as it travels from a person&amp;#39;s ring, through their phone app, over the internet, and as it lands on Oura&amp;#39;s servers.&amp;#39; Very strange -- it seems to be conflating end-to-end encryption with encryption-in-transit.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248337&quot; title=&quot;It also doesn&amp;#39;t sound like its encrypted at rest. Perhaps each in-transit is held to be a unique e2e IP exchange?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248383&quot; title=&quot;Encrypted at rest means something different. It means if you pull the hard drive out no one can decrypt it. Not that it is encrypted in the database.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48249245&quot; title=&quot;Does encryption at rest actually do much? The percentage of attacks that were perpetrated by people getting physical access to a drive must approach zero.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some participants argue that Apple is the only trustworthy provider for sensitive health data due to its history of resisting federal demands &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248338&quot; title=&quot;This is why although I don&amp;#39;t love my Apple Watch, I&amp;#39;m not using anything else. It&amp;#39;s very sensitive data and Apple is the only company worth trusting with it. They&amp;#39;re not perfect but compared to others there&amp;#39;s no competition.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248555&quot; title=&quot;Yeah there&amp;#39;s no one I&amp;#39;d trust with my personal data except Apple. Their track record of refusing to bow down to the feds has been golden. 24 carat infact.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others mock the irony of paying a subscription fee for devices that facilitate monitoring &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248402&quot; title=&quot;guy who pays $6/month to be monitored by the f3ds&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2026/05/21/italy-moves-to-airbus-a330-tankers-in-major-nato-aligned-shift&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Italy moves to Airbus A330 tankers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (euronews.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248775&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;279 points · 112 comments · by embedding-shape&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Italy has signed a €1.39 billion contract for six Airbus A330 MRTT tanker aircraft, abandoning a previous plan to purchase Boeing KC-46 Pegasus jets in a strategic shift toward European defense infrastructure within the NATO framework. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2026/05/21/italy-moves-to-airbus-a330-tankers-in-major-nato-aligned-shift&quot; title=&quot;Italy moves to Airbus A330 tankers in major NATO-aligned shift    Rome shifts course: six Airbus A330 MRTT tanker aircraft, worth around €1.39 billion in total, to bolster the European pillar in NATO. #EuropeNews    * [Go to navigation](#enw-navigation-bar)  * [Go to main content](#enw-main-content)  * [Go to search](#search-autocomplete)  * [Go to footer](#enw-site-footer)    [ ]    English    *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Italy&amp;#39;s move to Airbus tankers is viewed as a consequence of Boeing&amp;#39;s internal decline and technical delays with the KC-46, which have allowed the A330 MRTT to become a more competitive industrial choice &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48249189&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Several defence analysts point out that although the KC-46 is the standard tanker of the USAF, it has suffered technical problems and delays that have slowed its competitiveness abroad, to the benefit of the A330 MRTT, which has already been adopted by many NATO and non-NATO allies. In this sense, the Italian choice is seen more as an industrial victory for Airbus than as an American “political defeat”. The political factor surely played a role here, but this bit at the end of the article…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48249529&quot; title=&quot;Having doors flying off one of your planes and engine failure causing part of the cowling to bust a window and sucking a passenger out of another is definitely not a bit of politics. Nevermind the bullshit 737Max nonsense. At this point, I&amp;#39;d imagine any Boeing orders left are only in place because Airbus can&amp;#39;t keep up.  Politics didn&amp;#39;t need to come within 10 miles of this decision. It&amp;#39;s just the free cherry on top.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. The shift also reflects growing concerns regarding the United States&amp;#39; reliability as a defense partner; users cite Switzerland’s experience with ballooning F-35 costs and contract disputes as a warning that political risks may outweigh performance advantages &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48249276&quot; title=&quot;Meanwhile Switzerland is being taken to the cleaners. F35s that had a fix cost in contract with Lockheed are no longer fixed cost because the US says so. Patriot systen permanently delayed and price going up and up. Stop payment resulted in the US pulling from the pre payment for the F35s...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48249409&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Stop payment resulted in the US pulling from the pre payment for the F35s... Which Switzerland then reluctantly agreed was allowed under the terms. As you say, totally being taken to the cleaners, and it is unclear how they escape in the short term. The more this happens though, the more deals like Italy&amp;#39;s make senese, irrespective of the performance comparison of the two planes. If the US is going to be an unreliable partner, that will filter through in many many ways, and the US can hardly…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48249658&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I don&amp;#39;t understand why US weapons manufactures are not lobbying harder It doesn’t really matter if your product is better or cheaper, if the customer thinks that service and spare parts might possibly be withdrawn in the future for political (or whatever) reasons they won’t buy your product.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue Boeing&amp;#39;s past safety incidents are less relevant than current fuel efficiency and maintenance, others contend that the U.S. is losing the European market during a historic rearmament period due to administrative ineptitude and a lack of effective lobbying &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48249437&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand why US weapons manufactures are not lobbying harder. They are losing the European market just as the largest rearmament since ww2 happens. Maybe they are and its just a lost cause with the US administration.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48249873&quot; title=&quot;You have to understand that the smartest people in the US didn’t vote for this administration and are just as horrified as everyone else with how inept and pathetic this administration is. Unfortunately we’re a minority, the senate’s design (Wyoming has the same number of senators as California even though a small city in CA may have more people than the whole state) and the US is so ridiculously gerrymandered. Sorry everybody but we just have to wait this stupidity out.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48249700&quot; title=&quot;Incidents that are over five years old have minimal impact in terms of current competition between Boing and Airbus. The airbus A320 family is associated with 1,490 fatalities, there’s just a vast number of flights daily so tiny risks add up.  Companies buying new aircraft care far more  about maintenance to fuel efficiency than a few rare incidents due to already corrected issues.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://olano.dev/blog/dangerously-skip/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;-​-dangerously-skip-reading-code&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (olano.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246232&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;192 points · 193 comments · by fagnerbrack&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that if organizations prioritize LLM-driven speed, engineers should shift their rigor from reviewing generated code to maintaining high-level specifications and automated tests that hold non-deterministic output accountable. &lt;a href=&quot;https://olano.dev/blog/dangerously-skip/&quot; title=&quot;Title: -​-dangerously-skip-reading-code    URL Source: https://olano.dev/blog/dangerously-skip/    Published Time: 2026-02-16T16:00:00-03:00    Markdown Content:  I concluded my [previous post](https://olano.dev/blog/tactical-tornado) saying that it was irresponsible to assume that we won’t need to worry about reading and debugging our code anymore—to assume that whatever problem that pops up the LLMs will be able to fix for us. This felt irresponsible because, up until now, it has been the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion explores shifting software rigor from manual code review to high-level specifications as AI-generated code outpaces human reading capacity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248620&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If I had to roll out such a development process today, I’d make a standardized Markdown specification the new unit of knowledge for the software project. Product owners and engineers could initially collaborate on this spec and on test cases to enforce business rules. Those should be checked into the project repositories along with the implementing code. There would need to be automated pull-request checks verifying not only that tests pass but that code conforms to the spec. This…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48252373&quot; title=&quot;Software engineering has always worked this way, just not to ICs. “The LLMs produce non-deterministic output and generate code much faster than we can read it, so we can’t seriously expect to effectively review, understand, and approve every diff anymore. But that doesn’t necessarily mean we stop being rigorous, it could mean we should move rigor elsewhere.“ Direct reports, when delegated tasks by managers, product non-deterministic outputs much faster than team leads/managers can review,…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48252135&quot; title=&quot;Author here. I&amp;#39;m surprised to see this surfacing now. I just wanted to clarify, since apparently the post doesn&amp;#39;t do a good job at it, that what I discussed there is not a methodology I advocate for. The point of the post was: ok, since there are organizations mandating to maximize speed by reducing time spent on typing code (or even mandating to maximize agents usage), is there a way we can meet that requirement while still preserving the rigor somewhere else? This was a follow up to a…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest standardized Markdown or XML for these specs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248620&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If I had to roll out such a development process today, I’d make a standardized Markdown specification the new unit of knowledge for the software project. Product owners and engineers could initially collaborate on this spec and on test cases to enforce business rules. Those should be checked into the project repositories along with the implementing code. There would need to be automated pull-request checks verifying not only that tests pass but that code conforms to the spec. This…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48250866&quot; title=&quot;Hate it all you want, but XML is genuinely a good fit there, and Claude is apparently insanely good at working with XML prompts.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, critics argue that creating an unambiguous, formal specification is essentially &amp;#34;programming&amp;#34; by another name &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48249526&quot; title=&quot;What we really we need is some kind of more detailed spec language that doesn&amp;#39;t have edge cases, where we describe exactly what we expect the generated code to do, and then formally verify that the now generated code matches the input spec requirement. It&amp;#39;d be super helpful to have something more formal with no ambiguity, especially because the english language tends to be pretty ambiguous in general which can result in spec problems I also tend to find especially that there&amp;#39;s a lot of cruft in…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248283&quot; title=&quot;The underlying mechanism is still the same: humans type and products come out. So something which must be true if this author is right is that whatever the new language is—the thing people are typing into markdown—must be able to express the same rigor in less words than existing source code. Otherwise the result is just legacy coding in a new programming language.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Others note that treating code as a &amp;#34;black box&amp;#34; mirrors existing management structures and cross-team dependencies, though verifying that code actually conforms to a spec remains a significant technical challenge &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247517&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; There would need to be automated pull-request checks verifying not only that tests pass but that code conforms to the spec. As I understand, this is an unsolved problem.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48252373&quot; title=&quot;Software engineering has always worked this way, just not to ICs. “The LLMs produce non-deterministic output and generate code much faster than we can read it, so we can’t seriously expect to effectively review, understand, and approve every diff anymore. But that doesn’t necessarily mean we stop being rigorous, it could mean we should move rigor elsewhere.“ Direct reports, when delegated tasks by managers, product non-deterministic outputs much faster than team leads/managers can review,…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48253099&quot; title=&quot;Simon Willison made a similar parallel recently: https://simonwillison.net/2026/May/6/vibe-coding-and-agentic... “The thing that really helps me is thinking back to when I’ve worked at larger organizations where I’ve been an engineering manager. Other teams are building software that my team depends on.      If another team hands over something and says, “hey, this is the image resize service, here’s how to use it to resize your images”... I’m not going to go and read every line of code that they…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dutchnews.nl/2026/05/us-tech-firms-share-dutch-regulator-officials-names-with-senate/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;US tech firms share Dutch regulator officials&amp;#39; names with Senate&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (dutchnews.nl)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246614&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;219 points · 163 comments · by zqna&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Dutch cabinet has expressed deep concern after U.S. tech firms, including Microsoft and Meta, shared the names of Dutch regulators and academics with a Senate committee investigating &amp;#34;tech censorship,&amp;#34; potentially exposing these officials to travel bans or sanctions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dutchnews.nl/2026/05/us-tech-firms-share-dutch-regulator-officials-names-with-senate/&quot; title=&quot;US tech firms share Dutch regulator officials’ names with senate - DutchNews.nl    Companies such as Microsoft and Meta have shared the names of civil servants and academics working on European tech regulation with a senate committee investigating “tech censorship” or “jawboning”, news magazine Vrij Nederland reported on Friday. The cabinet has described the news as “extremely worrying”, given that the named officials could now face travel bans or even sanctions, Vrij Nederland said. “If you want…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Dutch government faces criticism for prioritizing US tech partnerships and acquisitions, such as Microsoft and Solvinity, despite official rhetoric regarding European digital sovereignty &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246747&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; However, stopping working with Microsoft and other US tech companies is not an option in the short term, he told the magazine. &amp;gt; Van der Burg is currently grappling with the issue of Solvinity, a Dutch cloud service provider which is widely used by government departments including the Digid identity system, and which is on the verge of being sold to a US company. &amp;gt; The Dutch tax office is also currently switching to Microsoft systems, despite MPs’ concerns. They all talk about the importance…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246782&quot; title=&quot;They all talk about the importance of European digital sovereignty and then continue to do the exact opposite behind the scenes. To be honest and I say this as a Dutch person, this is typical Dutch (government). Basically two rules in Dutch politics: (1) always choose the option that pleases the US the most; (2) always postpone solving issues to the latest possible moment (US dependence, nitrogen deposition, childcare benefits scandal, gas-induced earthquakes). France, Germany, etc. are much…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters disagree on the EU&amp;#39;s global standing, with some arguing that Europe has traded &amp;#34;hard power&amp;#34; for a crumbling regulatory influence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246866&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not only Dutch. Instead of building sovereignity, the EU thought they could regulate their way and force everyone to bend the knee because of their share as a trading partner. This started 20 years ago. However what has happened is that the EU&amp;#39;s soft power is crumbling, but the politicians have hard to grasp with the reality they could somehow dictate things globally. AI will only further accelerate this. Only way to have control is to have domestic actors you can push around.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246920&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; However what has happened is that the EU&amp;#39;s soft power is crumbling Uh, no. The US soft power is turning to dust whilst the EU is out there building the new free [trade] world, with itself as the biggest lynchpin. What has happened the past ±30 years is that most EU countries cut spending on their militaries to the bone, because big brother USA would take care of it anyway. Now that we are returning to a multi-polar world, suddenly the EU is left scrambling for hard power that it doesn&amp;#39;t have.…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247176&quot; title=&quot;Europeans (and not just the EU) think they still have the influence on the world they had in the 1980s when their economies were a much larger proportion of the global economy. Europeans have no idea what the world looks like from Asia which contains most of the world&amp;#39;s population and generates a third of global GDP.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend the US is becoming an unreliable partner that will eventually drive the EU toward independent tech stacks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246920&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; However what has happened is that the EU&amp;#39;s soft power is crumbling Uh, no. The US soft power is turning to dust whilst the EU is out there building the new free [trade] world, with itself as the biggest lynchpin. What has happened the past ±30 years is that most EU countries cut spending on their militaries to the bone, because big brother USA would take care of it anyway. Now that we are returning to a multi-polar world, suddenly the EU is left scrambling for hard power that it doesn&amp;#39;t have.…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant debate over whether the EU functions as a protector of its members or an anti-competitive trade bloc that is increasingly out of touch with global economic shifts toward Asia &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247008&quot; title=&quot;It is difficult to think of an economic region that is more opposed to free trade than Europe (that isn&amp;#39;t a comedy country). Possibly some countries in South America? Trade within Europe has massive restrictions. I have no idea why, given the stated aims of Europe...we are posting this on a post about the Netherlands trying to protect office software ffs, people think this isn&amp;#39;t the case. One of the reasons why the EU created a trade bloc, and the same reasons why you see the same attempts in…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247111&quot; title=&quot;The only people that think global free trade is a good thing are the top .001% net worth individuals which use it to wield power. Trading blocks (like the European single market) are specifically designed to protect their members from shit that global corporations or other nations attempt to get away with. I&amp;#39;m not sure what &amp;#39;Trade within Europe has massive restrictions.&amp;#39; means without context. Compared to some Randian capitalist utopia where there are no rules and no governments? Or compared to…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247309&quot; title=&quot;It is a general western problem to some extent, but the US has a a faster growing economy than any of the big European economies. It is still a super-power.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reenigne.org/blog/80386-microcode-disassembled/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;80386 microcode disassembled&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (reenigne.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247004&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;273 points · 50 comments · by nand2mario&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Researchers have successfully extracted and disassembled the Intel 80386 microcode from high-resolution die images, revealing how the processor manages its 215 entry points. The analysis uncovered a potential 40-year-old security flaw in I/O permission bitmap handling and confirmed that every 80386 instruction is microcode-driven. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reenigne.org/blog/80386-microcode-disassembled/&quot; title=&quot;Title: 80386 microcode disassembled « Reenigne blog    URL Source: https://www.reenigne.org/blog/80386-microcode-disassembled/    Markdown Content:  After I posted [8086 microcode disassembled](https://www.reenigne.org/blog/8086-microcode-disassembled/), [Ken Shirriff](https://www.righto.com/) sent me a high-resolution image of the microcode ROM from the 80386. I didn&amp;#39;t expect I would ever do anything with it for a couple of reasons: one is that it&amp;#39;s absolutely huge (94720 bits) compared to the 8086…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 80386 microcode was extracted by visually identifying transistors within the chip&amp;#39;s ROM array from high-resolution die images, where a &amp;#34;1&amp;#34; is represented by the physical presence of a transistor &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247384&quot; title=&quot;The microcode is in a ROM. It&amp;#39;s a regular structure where a 1 looks different to a 0.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247432&quot; title=&quot;Yes, literally this. No verilog decode, just looking for signals in the image of a 1 vs. a 0. For example, a 1 may be the existence of a transistor at a particular intersection of wiring.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48251148&quot; title=&quot;I worked a bit on the extraction process so I can chime in here a bit. The first part is to just mark the x,y locations of where all the bits are, generally by the intersection of the rows and columns of the microcode array. Then you have to classify them as 0&amp;#39;s or 1&amp;#39;s. Each is visually distinct, a 1 being encoded by the presence of a transistor and a gap in the polysilicon. We didn&amp;#39;t have to guess which is which is by the nature of Intel microcode we could assume 0&amp;#39;s were much more frequent,…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. To process the data, researchers used a convolutional neural network to classify bits and manually verified the results to correct errors caused by dust or blurriness &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48251148&quot; title=&quot;I worked a bit on the extraction process so I can chime in here a bit. The first part is to just mark the x,y locations of where all the bits are, generally by the intersection of the rows and columns of the microcode array. Then you have to classify them as 0&amp;#39;s or 1&amp;#39;s. Each is visually distinct, a 1 being encoded by the presence of a transistor and a gap in the polysilicon. We didn&amp;#39;t have to guess which is which is by the nature of Intel microcode we could assume 0&amp;#39;s were much more frequent,…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247502&quot; title=&quot;So what you actually need is a program that navigates through the huge image of the die and detects if the structure that is looking at is a 1 or a 0? This at the fundamental level is a cross between machine learning and image processing?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Decoding the resulting bit array required educated guesses and Python scripts to identify patterns in the 37-bit microcode words, as official documentation for the 386&amp;#39;s specific format was unavailable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48251374&quot; title=&quot;Intel had given us some clues - they had written somewhere that the 386 had 2560 microcode words.  The microcode array has 37 banks - each bank resolves one bit from the 37 bits that comprise a microcode word.  But which way to decode them? From top down? Bottom up?  Were they interleaved in weird ways? Documentation from the NEC vs Intel lawsuit ended up documenting the microcode word format for both the 8088 and NEC V20 CPUs, but unfortunately, we were on our own for the 386. But we could…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While this low-level reverse engineering is celebrated as &amp;#34;peak Hacker News&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247100&quot; title=&quot;For me, this is peak Hacker News. I am happy I took the hard courses at uni to understand a post like this. I’m also happy that HN was there to stimulate this thinking at the time (2015). Even if I now don’t really do anything with my humble knowledge of low level programming, every time it feels consciousnesses enriching. And it’s an awesome feeling. For people that don’t have access to a uni, I recommend nand2tetris.org&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, commenters noted that other architectures like the original ARM avoided microcode entirely &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48249690&quot; title=&quot;Meanwhile the original ARM didn&amp;#39;t use any microcode at all.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2026/may/22/experience-found-baby-subway-now-26-year-old-son&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Experience: We found a baby on the subway – now he&amp;#39;s our 26-year-old son&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theguardian.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48245571&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;256 points · 66 comments · by Michelangelo11&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After finding an abandoned newborn in a New York City subway station in 2000, Danny Stewart and his partner Pete were invited by a judge to adopt the child, whom they raised into a successful software developer. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2026/may/22/experience-found-baby-subway-now-26-year-old-son&quot; title=&quot;Experience: we found a baby on the subway – now he’s our 26-year-old son    I was rushing towards the turnstile when I noticed a bundle of clothes in a corner. I walked over, peeled back a dark sweatshirt, and saw him    [Skip to main content](#maincontent)[Skip to navigation](#navigation)    Close dialogue1/3Next imagePrevious imageToggle caption    [Print…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the remarkable nature of the story, with some users questioning the apparent ease of the adoption process compared to the rigorous vetting required in countries like the UK &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246352&quot; title=&quot;I find this story slightly odd. I&amp;#39;m not trying to suggest it&amp;#39;s not true, I have trust in the Guardian not to print falsehoods; but do they really offer abandoned babies to just anyone in America? Here in the UK, I used to work with a guy many years ago who was trying to adopt. He and his wife had to go through months and months of vetting and paperwork to be allowed to become adopted parents. You basically have to prove that you are fit to be a parent. And yet in this story a court basically…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247750&quot; title=&quot;Man, in the UK you can’t even get a frigging cat without having several inspections of your home and interviews to confirm that you will be a fit “parent”. I mean, I’m all for safeguarding in principle - but it evidently doesn’t bloody work. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5y0xz424v1o&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some find the series of coincidences—such as the same judge presiding over both the adoption and the couple&amp;#39;s wedding—almost too perfect to believe, others emphasize the emotional weight of the situation and the likely desperation of the biological mother &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48245836&quot; title=&quot;Everything about this story is so satisfying, that if I read it in a lesser source I would be doubting it. The person finding the baby was the person who eventually adopted him. The judge asking the guy to adopt the baby was the same judge that performed the wedding of the couple doing the adoption. Just so many great details.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246927&quot; title=&quot;God bless the woman who felt they had no other choice &amp;amp; give them help rather than punishment. We will never know the circumstances but we can obviously assume they weren&amp;#39;t very much better than the baby&amp;#39;s to have done this. Nobody doing something like this out of disdain for the child would have carried it to delivery (regardless of their stance on abortion).&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters also speculate that the article may have simplified the legal difficulties for the sake of the narrative, noting that adoption systems are often perceived as inconsistent or unfair &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246360&quot; title=&quot;I feel adoption is either super easy or super hard. No one claims the system is fair. It can also be the article skipped on these difficulties for a better headline.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3w2l249j8go&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Toxic chemical leak at a manufacturing facility in Orange County&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48252060&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;166 points · 154 comments · by borski&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;California Governor Gavin Newsom declared a state of emergency as crews race to contain a 7,000-gallon tank of volatile methyl methacrylate at an Orange County aerospace facility, which officials warn is at risk of exploding or leaking. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3w2l249j8go&quot; title=&quot;California declares state of emergency as fire crews race to contain toxic chemical leak    Thousands have been evacuated as officials warn a tank containing about 7,000 gallons of methyl methacrylate could explode.    [Skip to content](#bbc-main)    [British Broadcasting Corporation](/)    * [Home](/)  * [News](/news)  * [Sport](/sport)  * [Business](/business)  * [Technology](/technology)  * [Health](/health)  * [Culture](/culture)  * [Arts](/arts)  * [Travel](/travel)  * [Earth](/future-planet)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on how 40,000 residents ended up living within the blast radius of a facility processing toxic chemicals, with users debating whether urban sprawl or a failure of zoning laws allowed housing to be built within 430 feet of the site &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48252325&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d be curious how it came to pass that 40k people were living within the blast radius of a plant processing toxic chemicals. Isn&amp;#39;t this sort of thing the primary justification for the existence of zoning laws?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48252592&quot; title=&quot;The plant has been around since at least the 1970s. At the time it likely was on the edge of town, but through 50 years of urban sprawl, the town grew around it. It may be even older than that. My source for the age of the site is this 1970 NASA ALSEP supplier list (from the moon program!), which lists the address as an approved manufacturer on page 38: https://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/ALSEP/pdf/31111000671279.pdf&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48252863&quot; title=&quot;Surely they&amp;#39;ve had to get new permits over time as their operations changed? And why didn&amp;#39;t the presence of the plant prevent the town from growing around it? There&amp;#39;s a home 430 feet away from it. At that point you didn&amp;#39;t even try to create a buffer zone.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some characterize the facility as &amp;#34;light manufacturing&amp;#34; for aerospace components that has existed since at least 1970, others argue the scale of the storage tanks was inappropriate for the location &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48252411&quot; title=&quot;The actual site of the tank is 33.78356416377991, -117.99993897629278 [1] - its in an industrial park, and its not a large scale chemical manufacturing facility. Its &amp;#39;light manufacturing&amp;#39; for a company that makes custom formed acrylics for aerospace. https://www.google.com/maps/place/33°47&amp;#39;00.8%22N+117°59&amp;#39;59.8...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48252592&quot; title=&quot;The plant has been around since at least the 1970s. At the time it likely was on the edge of town, but through 50 years of urban sprawl, the town grew around it. It may be even older than that. My source for the age of the site is this 1970 NASA ALSEP supplier list (from the moon program!), which lists the address as an approved manufacturer on page 38: https://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/ALSEP/pdf/31111000671279.pdf&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48252518&quot; title=&quot;I get that, but the reality is that 40k people were evacuated. Shouldn&amp;#39;t zoning be set up so as to prevent that? Light manufacturing in general is fine but it seems like these particular storage tanks might have been a bit too large for that location.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical suggestions to drain or cool the tank were met with skepticism regarding the risk of sparks and explosions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48252321&quot; title=&quot;Is it not possible for them to just... spray it with ice cold water?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48253284&quot; title=&quot;Why can’t they drill it and pipe it off into some drainage pipe for cooling or collecting in trucks? Divide and conquer&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48253352&quot; title=&quot;Drill = spark = boom = nasty stuff all over surrounding area&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, while one commenter noted that the EPA recently proposed deregulating safety audits and hazard reporting for such facilities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48252374&quot; title=&quot;Worth mentioning that in February the EPA proposed to severely deregulate chemical facilities like the one in Garden Grove, gutting third-party audits, hazard reporting, and public transparency requirements. They titled it the ‘Common Sense Approach to Chemical Accident Prevention.’ The public comment window closed just eleven days before this disaster… https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-02-24/pdf/2026-0...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://torrentfreak.com/spanish-court-declines-to-fine-nordvpn-over-laliga-piracy-blocking-order/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Spanish court declines to fine NordVPN over LaLiga piracy blocking order&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (torrentfreak.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48245362&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;198 points · 113 comments · by gslin&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Spanish court has rejected LaLiga’s request to fine NordVPN for non-compliance with a piracy blocking order, acknowledging a genuine technical dispute over whether the requested IP-level blocks would cause the illegal overblocking of legitimate websites. &lt;a href=&quot;https://torrentfreak.com/spanish-court-declines-to-fine-nordvpn-over-laliga-piracy-blocking-order/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Spanish Court Declines to Fine NordVPN Over LaLiga Piracy Blocking Order    URL Source: https://torrentfreak.com/spanish-court-declines-to-fine-nordvpn-over-laliga-piracy-blocking-order/    Published Time: 2026-05-22T13:59:52+00:00    Markdown Content:  [Home](https://torrentfreak.com/ &amp;#39;Go to TorrentFreak.&amp;#39;)&amp;gt;[Anti-Piracy](https://torrentfreak.com/category/anti-piracy/ &amp;#39;Go to the Anti-Piracy category archives.&amp;#39;)&amp;gt;[Site Blocking](https://torrentfreak.com/category/anti-piracy/site-blocking/ &amp;#39;Go to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Spanish court&amp;#39;s decision is seen as a victory against &amp;#34;indiscriminate IP blocking,&amp;#34; which users report has frequently disrupted legitimate services like GitHub, Docker Hub, and various Cloudflare-hosted sites &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48245508&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; “Inside Spain, the consequences of indiscriminate IP blocking have become almost impossible to ignore,” NordVPN writes Too fucking right. It is beyond tiresome to fire up the laptop and wonder whether I&amp;#39;ll need a VPN to access GitHub today&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246251&quot; title=&quot;When the blocks happen, does it take GitHub with it for you? I&amp;#39;m on Vodafone (in Spain) and it&amp;#39;s just a few Cloudflare IPs that get blocked during the matches, never had GitHub unavailable, as Microsoft doesn&amp;#39;t use Cloudflare for GitHub, AFAIK.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246381&quot; title=&quot;Which IPs that you use daily are actually affected by this though? I&amp;#39;ve been trying to keep track myself and so far in my months of collecting, I&amp;#39;ve noted down one service which is unavailable during the matches for me, Docker Hub, everything else seems to work today. Keep in mind, when they first started the blocks, a lot more was taken offline than what gets taken down when a match happens today, as they seem to continuously adjust it. The article you linked is from almost exactly a year ago,…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the legal system is slowly correcting these &amp;#34;unconstitutional&amp;#34; overreaches &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246314&quot; title=&quot;Literally it&amp;#39;ll sort itself out, as the bans are unconstitutional and more, law just takes long time and we have other shit to sort out before starting to panic about 3-5 Cloudflare IPs getting banned for 2 hours a week...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the deep cultural obsession with football allows leagues to wield excessive power that requires more active public resistance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48245610&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ll repeat what I said the last time about laliga... &amp;gt; Foot egg is so ingrained into the countrymen that nothing else matters. &amp;gt; There wouldn&amp;#39;t be so much of a forced monopoly if more people would stop watching games and stand up to laliga. &amp;gt; Complaining on the internet every time laliga shuts down github etc isn&amp;#39;t going to change anything, we can&amp;#39;t solve your problems, the change has to come from within. Props to the court for telling laliga to go away.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48245978&quot; title=&quot;Considering web addresses are easily changed, it was a futile suggestion to say block LaLiga streams. Good on Nordvpn. As a football fan, the owners of the leagues have too much power. Like in the UK people have gone to jail for piracy, which should never happen.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant disagreement over the scale of the impact, with debate over whether the blocks affect a few targeted IPs or thousands of addresses every weekend &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246341&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; about 3-5 Cloudflare IPs getting banned You missed a few zeroes there buddy &amp;gt; According to LaLiga itself, around 3,000 IP addresses are blocked every weekend[1] [1] https://cybernews.com/news/cloudflare-spain-laliga-piracy-bl...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246381&quot; title=&quot;Which IPs that you use daily are actually affected by this though? I&amp;#39;ve been trying to keep track myself and so far in my months of collecting, I&amp;#39;ve noted down one service which is unavailable during the matches for me, Docker Hub, everything else seems to work today. Keep in mind, when they first started the blocks, a lot more was taken offline than what gets taken down when a match happens today, as they seem to continuously adjust it. The article you linked is from almost exactly a year ago,…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fortune.com/2026/05/22/microsoft-ai-cost-problem-tokens-agents/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft reports AI is more expensive than paying human employees&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (fortune.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48244434&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;228 points · 70 comments · by nreece&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft and Uber are scaling back internal AI usage as high token consumption costs begin to exceed the expense of human employees, challenging the economic viability of replacing labor with artificial intelligence. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fortune.com/2026/05/22/microsoft-ai-cost-problem-tokens-agents/&quot; title=&quot;Microsoft reports are exposing AI&amp;#39;s real cost problem: Using the tech is more expensive than paying human employees | Fortune    Companies are racing to incentivize employees to use AI. But as some companies are finding, the more employees that use the technology, the heavier the bill.    Search    Subscribe    * [Home](/)  * [Latest](/section/latest/)  * [Fortune 500](/section/fortune-500/)  * [Finance](/section/finance/)  * [Tech](/section/tech/)  * [Leadership](/section/leadership/)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely agree that the article&amp;#39;s title is misleading, noting that Microsoft did not report AI is more expensive than humans but rather restricted internal use of a competitor&amp;#39;s model (Claude) to promote their own product, GitHub Copilot &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48244600&quot; title=&quot;The title seems misleading, and reading the article explains the reason more clearly. There&amp;#39;s nonsense OKR&amp;#39;s and objectives at these companies to burn as many tokens as possible. It turns out that when you make a metric out of token usage, it unsurprisingly ends up becoming extremely expensive. Inference is affordable, and you don&amp;#39;t need a SOTA proprietary model to get a lot of use out of this technology. While you likely will still need a human engineer for quite a while longer, I don&amp;#39;t agree…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48244707&quot; title=&quot;The premise of this article is incorrect - MS isn&amp;#39;t cancelling Claude code internal usage because of AI costs too much, they&amp;#39;re cancelling it because GitHub copilot is the compete product and they want their employees to use their product. It&amp;#39;s the same reason Teams got so much attention during lockdown.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48244591&quot; title=&quot;Literally nowhere in the article does Microsoft report AI is more expensive than paying human employees.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion highlights how &amp;#34;vibe leadership&amp;#34; and arbitrary OKRs—such as incentivizing high token usage—can lead to inflated costs that do not reflect the actual affordability of inference &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48244600&quot; title=&quot;The title seems misleading, and reading the article explains the reason more clearly. There&amp;#39;s nonsense OKR&amp;#39;s and objectives at these companies to burn as many tokens as possible. It turns out that when you make a metric out of token usage, it unsurprisingly ends up becoming extremely expensive. Inference is affordable, and you don&amp;#39;t need a SOTA proprietary model to get a lot of use out of this technology. While you likely will still need a human engineer for quite a while longer, I don&amp;#39;t agree…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48244656&quot; title=&quot;They may as well have just said:  Company institutes an OKR that the IT division must spend over $1000/day/developer (fictious number).  Company is surprised when IT division is costing far more than it did before. Company increases this to $1500/day/developer to build a system to identify why this has happened. I feel like vibe coding is less of an issue than vibe leadership at this point, and vibe leadership has nothing inherently to do with AI. These people are getting a vague feeling in their…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, some participants argue that the media is intentionally &amp;#34;torching&amp;#34; AI with negative narratives, while others suggest the discourse is becoming a &amp;#34;noisy room&amp;#34; of extreme pro- and anti-AI marketing that obscures technical reality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48244701&quot; title=&quot;The media seems hellbent on torching AI. My news feeds are nothing but stories about the evils of data centers, how useless AI is, and how much everyone hates it.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48244815&quot; title=&quot;The media is hellbent on torching it, and on propping it up against all reason too, both things can be true.  HN is no exception.  It&amp;#39;s another noisy room problem where the distortion in dialogue is rapidly leading us into a distorted reality. https://thenoisyroom.com/ For people who are actually interested in reality, participation in the mainstream discourse either way is a strategic error. The best thing to do is to check out from all of it, actually read the literature and listen to the…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.wired.com/story/security-news-this-week-fbi-license-plate-reader-real-time-access/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The FBI Wants &amp;#39;Near Real-Time&amp;#39; Access to US License Plate Readers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (wired.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247737&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;207 points · 91 comments · by Brajeshwar&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FBI is seeking to purchase multimillion-dollar nationwide access to automated license plate reader data, requesting &amp;#34;near real-time&amp;#34; tracking of vehicle movements across the U.S. even as some lawmakers propose federal legislation to prohibit police from using the surveillance technology. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.wired.com/story/security-news-this-week-fbi-license-plate-reader-real-time-access/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The FBI Wants ‘Near Real-Time’ Access to US License Plate Readers    URL Source: https://www.wired.com/story/security-news-this-week-fbi-license-plate-reader-real-time-access/    Published Time: 2026-05-23T06:30:00.000-04:00    Markdown Content:  # The FBI Wants ‘Near Real-Time’ Access to US License Plate Readers | WIRED    Privacy Center    Currently, only residents from GDPR countries and certain US states can opt out of Tracking Technologies through our Consent Management Platform. Additional…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that local candidates should run on banning passive surveillance, suggesting that if data is never collected, it cannot be abused &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248319&quot; title=&quot;There’s a lot of local US candidates running this year on pushing back on the federal government. Realistically there’s not a ton that can be done at the level of a mayor or even state senator. However removing local passive surveillance is something that can make a genuine impact. I’d love to see people running on banning red light/license plate cameras and other passive surveillance tools. If the data is never collected it can’t be abused.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some point to *Carpenter v. United States* as a legal shield against warrantless tracking &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248628&quot; title=&quot;SCOTUS has already ruled that tracking people&amp;#39;s movement over time without a warrant is a Fourth Amendment violation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carpenter_v._United_States&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others express skepticism about the current Supreme Court&amp;#39;s commitment to precedent &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248703&quot; title=&quot;Unfortunately, “SCOTUS previously declared this unconstitutional” doesn’t have quite the same sense of finality it used to these days.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248722&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s really more of just polite suggestion these days, sadly. Except any time they vote against legalized abortion or minority issues. Then the rulings are rigidly enforced.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. The thread also features a debate on transportation and privacy, with some arguing that car-dependent infrastructure erodes civil rights compared to being a pedestrian &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248499&quot; title=&quot;This is also why car dependent infrastructure is a bad thing for Americans’ freedom. You have more civil rights as a pedestrian than you do in a licensed motor vehicle.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248637&quot; title=&quot;First I would question why anyone has to drive 20 miles to reach basic needs like grocery stores and employers. Isn’t that already a failure of urban and suburban planning? Existing on public transit is not an automatic agreement to be searched as you describe. Here’s an attorney website that describes your general rights: https://azharillc.com/blog/youre-riding-the-l-train-can-cops... There are many more things that are illegal for you to be doing as a driver of a car versus existing in public…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend that private vehicles offer more protection from searches than public transit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248556&quot; title=&quot;Pedestrians are limited to a ~20 mile radius. Travelling further, without a car, then requires use of public transportation and by using public transportation depending where you are you have implied consent to being searched &amp;#39;for safety&amp;#39;. Acknowledging civil asset forfeiture is a problem in some jurisdictions, private automobiles still provide a greater expectation of privacy than public modes of transport.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/amatsuda/rubish&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rubish: A Unix shell written in pure Ruby&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48245262&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;182 points · 106 comments · by winebarrel&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rubish is a pure Ruby-based Unix shell that offers full Bash compatibility while allowing users to seamlessly integrate Ruby code, methods, and iterators directly into shell scripts and commands. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/amatsuda/rubish&quot; title=&quot;GitHub - amatsuda/rubish    Contribute to amatsuda/rubish development by creating an account on GitHub.    [Skip to content](#start-of-content)    ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [Sign in](/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Famatsuda%2Frubish)    Appearance settings    * Platform      + AI CODE CREATION      - [GitHub CopilotWrite better code with AI](https://github.com/features/copilot)      - [GitHub SparkBuild and deploy intelligent apps](https://github.com/features/spark)      - [GitHub…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The project evokes a mix of amazement and horror, with some users praising the effort to blend Ruby and Bash while others remain skeptical of its practicality due to the lack of ubiquity in remote environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247243&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m simultaneously amazed and horrified (by the strange but amazing love child you&amp;#39;ve created between bash and ruby).  I spent years (nearly a decade) trying to blend ruby and bash to make the perfect shell, and after never being quite satisfied, I eventually gave up and embraced bash.  This does get closer/further than I ever could, and is a fascinating project.  I&amp;#39;m going to give it a spin, though I can already imagine the biggest obstacle I&amp;#39;ll hit:  rubish not being available in the remote…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247313&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I can already imagine the biggest obstacle I&amp;#39;ll hit: rubish not being available in the remote environments I need it to The ubiquitousness of bash is among the few reasons why it continues to endure. It will be eternal if nobody tries to replace it.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant portion of the debate centers on &amp;#34;vibe-coding&amp;#34; and the use of AI agents, with critics arguing that the resulting long, impenetrable methods make it difficult for human contributors to study or improve the code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247075&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m recently seeing more and more Ruby projects that are at least partly vibe-coded, and I&amp;#39;m kind of torn. On the one hand I appreciate that this allows people to create stuff that they maybe wouldn&amp;#39;t have the time to do otherwise. On the other, the code itself makes it harder for people to contribute, especially those, like me, who don&amp;#39;t use coding agents. A random example: https://github.com/amatsuda/rubish/blob/master/lib/rubish/pa... Where are the interface boundaries? Why are there methods…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247423&quot; title=&quot;Honestly I don&amp;#39;t know why would you choose ruby for vibecoding. This is a language that explicitly sacrifices important stuff like the strength of automatic checks possible and performance in lieu of developer ergonomics. Even if you support that particular choice, chosing the language when you won&amp;#39;t be writing or reading most of the code is a pretty poor tradeoff.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some prefer traditional pipes over Ruby&amp;#39;s method chaining, others note that alternative shells like Fish and Nushell have already proven that breaking Bash compatibility can be successful &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246143&quot; title=&quot;I much prefer the pipe to method chaining.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246444&quot; title=&quot;ls | grep file.txt  vs   ls().grep(&amp;#39;file.txt&amp;#39;)&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248509&quot; title=&quot;... and many also have succeeded. fish would not be as popular as it is otherwise, other alternative shells that break bash compatibility are being worked on and are gaining traction, elvish, nushell, murex... mixing shells is not as hard as some people claim. it&amp;#39;s like switching programming languages. i do that all the time. but then, i avoid bash scripting as much as i can (or shell scripting in general). if you actually enjoy bash scripting then switching may be harder.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pcmag.com/news/kash-patels-apparel-site-is-trying-to-trick-visitors-into-installing-malware&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;FBI director&amp;#39;s Based Apparel site has been spotted hosting a &amp;#39;ClickFix&amp;#39; attack&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (pcmag.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243293&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;194 points · 61 comments · by bilalq&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pcmag.com/news/kash-patels-apparel-site-is-trying-to-trick-visitors-into-installing-malware&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the security breach of BasedApparel.com, a site owned by the current FBI director that was compromised to host a &amp;#34;ClickFix&amp;#34; malware attack targeting macOS users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243510&quot; title=&quot;For people that can&amp;#39;t grok the title and the article like me: - BasedApparel.com is a website owned by a person that happens to be the FBI director now. (he owned it before he became the director if it matters) - The website BasedApparel.com was hacked and the hackers added a malicious click here to verify you are human section that tried to have you download a malicious payload if you were on macos.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters are divided on whether public officials should be required to divest from private businesses; some argue that maintaining such sites creates national security risks and conflicts of interest &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243564&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; he owned it before he became the director if it matters All the more reason that those who &amp;#39;serve&amp;#39; in the government should be required to divest of their business interests. The traffic such a site would get due to the tribalism prevalent in US politics makes it a fat target, and potentially a national security threat.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246662&quot; title=&quot;I disagree. I think the caliber of public employee, and their integrity, would be much higher if they were &amp;#39;only&amp;#39; allowed to collect their salary. No state employee would be allowed to run a business like this while employed where I live (sapphire-blue New England state FWIW). Government positions are fairly, but not extravagantly, compensated, prestigious and come with excellent benefits. They should not be an avenue for accumulation of riches. It clearly does not work well and we&amp;#39;re not…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend that forced divestment would discourage competent individuals from seeking public office &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246567&quot; title=&quot;This is not good. What it achieves, is that the quality of people who assume office sinks even lower than it is today, since anyone with a modicum of competence, would never divest a business for a low paid, public job. On the other hand... you _do_ have a point here. Care must be taken to make sure that the persons business does not profit by the PR and media exposure related to the position they are taking. I don&amp;#39;t know how to do this. Maybe someone else runs their business at arms length?…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users dismissed the story as an inflammatory headline, suggesting the director likely outsourced the site&amp;#39;s management and should not be held personally responsible for the technical failure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48245711&quot; title=&quot;Would this be a news if it was not owned by FBI director? Do we really expect the FBI director to be responsible for this? He probably outsourced it to some company. This is an inflammatory headline.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://horace.io/brrr_intro.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Making deep learning go brrrr from first principles (2022)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (horace.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246889&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;188 points · 65 comments · by tosh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Optimizing deep learning performance requires identifying whether a system is bottlenecked by compute, memory bandwidth, or overhead to apply effective solutions like operator fusion or JIT compilation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://horace.io/brrr_intro.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Making Deep Learning go Brrrr From First Principles    URL Source: https://horace.io/brrr_intro.html    Published Time: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 21:26:52 GMT    Markdown Content:  So, you want to improve the performance of your deep learning model. How might you approach such a task? Often, folk fall back to a grab-bag of tricks that might&amp;#39;ve worked before or saw on a tweet. &amp;#39;Use in-place operations! Set gradients to None! Install PyTorch 1.10.0 but not 1.10.1!&amp;#39;    It&amp;#39;s understandable why users often…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the massive performance gap between high-level Python code and specialized hardware, with one user noting that an A100 GPU can perform nearly 10 million FLOPs in the time it takes Python to execute one &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247050&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; in the time that Python can perform a single FLOP, an A100 could have chewed through 9.75 million FLOPS wild&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247895&quot; title=&quot;re comments: yes of course this is apples to oranges but that&amp;#39;s kind of the point it shows the vast span between specialized hardware throughput IFF you can use an A100 at its limit vs overhead of one of the most popular programming languages in use today that eventually does the &amp;#39;same thing&amp;#39; on a CPU the interesting thing is why that is so CPU vs GPU (latency vs throughput), boxing vs dense representation, interpreter overhead, scalar execution, layers upon layers, …&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this is a &amp;#34;category error&amp;#34; because languages don&amp;#39;t perform operations themselves &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247349&quot; title=&quot;Why are we comparing a programing language and a GPU. This is a category error. Programing languages do not do any operations. They perform no FLOPs, they are the thing the FLOPs are performing. &amp;#39;The I7-4770K and preform 20k more Flops than C++&amp;#39; is an equally sensible statement (i.e. not)&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that modern CPUs can actually rival GPU throughput if utilized correctly &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48248075&quot; title=&quot;A100 FP32 throughput “at its limit”: 19.5 TFLOP/s. AMD EPYC 9965 FP32 throughput “at its limit”: 41.2 TFLOP/s (192 cores x 64 FP32 FLOP/cycle/core x 3.35GHz).&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Contributors suggest that deep learning is best learned by starting with simple, loopy Python functions to build intuition before moving to the complex tensor optimizations and calculus required for high-performance execution &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48249257&quot; title=&quot;Deep learning is just glorified linear algebra. Master the progression: Feed-forward  CNN  RNN  LSTM  Attention. You don&amp;#39;t even need a GPU to understand the climax; Karpathy’s llama2.c implements a full transformer inference engine in just ~300 lines of C using SIMD pragmas for CPU execution.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48249543&quot; title=&quot;I wish more people pursued that approach to teaching neural networks. First teach what the network does and why, writing it as a loopy, inference-only Python function. Explain training only in an abstract way, E.G. with the &amp;#39;take a random weight, twist it a little and see if the loss improves&amp;#39; algorithm. This lets you focus on the architecture and on why it is what it is. Then, teach the intuitions behind derivatives and gradient descent. You don&amp;#39;t need the entirety of calculus, there&amp;#39;s no…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the thread touches on the &amp;#34;double-descent&amp;#34; phenomenon, noting that increasing model capacity can sometimes improve performance even after an initial period of overfitting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247061&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;For example, getting good performance on a dataset with deep learning also involves a lot of guesswork. But, if your training loss is way lower than your test loss, you&amp;#39;re in the &amp;#39;overfitting&amp;#39; regime, and you&amp;#39;re wasting your time if you try to increase the capacity of your model. https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.02292&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247148&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;We show that a variety of modern deep learning tasks exhibit a &amp;#39;double-descent&amp;#39; phenomenon where, as we increase model size, performance first gets worse and then gets better.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-22</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-22</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/22/us/politics/green-card-changes-trump.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Green card seekers must leave U.S. to apply, Trump administration says&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nytimes.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48241890&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1057 points&lt;/strong&gt; · &lt;strong&gt;1859 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by tlhunter&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Trump administration has issued a new policy requiring most green card seekers to leave the United States and apply through consulates abroad, limiting &amp;#34;adjustment of status&amp;#34; within the country to only extraordinary circumstances. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/22/us/politics/green-card-changes-trump.html&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.uscis.gov&amp;amp;#x2F;newsroom&amp;amp;#x2F;news-releases&amp;amp;#x2F;us-citizenship-and-immigration-services-will-grant-adjustment-of-status-only-in-extraordinary&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.uscis.gov&amp;amp;#x2F;newsroom&amp;amp;#x2F;news-releases&amp;amp;#x2F;us-citizenship-...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.uscis.gov&amp;amp;#x2F;sites&amp;amp;#x2F;default&amp;amp;#x2F;files&amp;amp;#x2F;document&amp;amp;#x2F;memos&amp;amp;#x2F;PM-602-0199-AdjustmentOfStatusAndDiscretion-20260521.pdf&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that requiring green card seekers to apply from abroad is a &amp;#34;malevolent&amp;#34; disruption of the only practical path for skilled workers, who cannot realistically maintain US employment while waiting years for uncertain consular processing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48251237&quot; title=&quot;This is insane. I cannot fathom how I, nor educated and talented people I know, could have possibly stayed in the US back in the day if this requirement had been in place then. Applying for a greencard while working on an H, J or O-class visa is extremely common. Far from a loophole, applying from inside the US is the only reasonable way to apply for a greencard. Depending on the country of origin, there may not even _be_ a US consulate, and where it exists, the wait can stretch into years, and…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48250112&quot; title=&quot;I had 10 years of work experience and had been married to my wife for two years, together for five, when I applied for my spousal visa. We had already gone through the UK visa process to bring her there, but decided we wanted to try the USA. Despite being able to show 10 years of consistent working history with income far exceeding the minimum, because I didn’t have a job lined up in the US (who would, or could, in that scenario?) we had to ask my wife&amp;#39;s elderly parents to sign affidavits of…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some note that leaving a country to renew a visa is common internationally &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48250134&quot; title=&quot;This is pretty normal for most countries&amp;#39; visa processes. You often have to leave to renew a visa.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend this policy is a cynical attempt to restrict legal immigration by reinterpreting &amp;#34;adjustment of status&amp;#34; as a discretionary grace rather than a standard procedure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48252694&quot; title=&quot;Unfortunately, I think this is the point. They want to push the needle so that even legal immigration is restricted or difficult (unless you happen to pay them directly) https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/23/us/politics/trump-legal-i...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48251978&quot; title=&quot;The internal memo on this is interesting: https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/memos/PM-... Essentially they&amp;#39;re trying to change the rules by aggressive re-interpretation of the existing legal framework, and not actually changing any laws or regulations. I don&amp;#39;t follow all of it, but it seems to be arguing that the &amp;#39;ordinary consular process&amp;#39;, leaving the country and applying for a visa from abroad, is the long-established default, and that &amp;#39;adjustment of status&amp;#39;, where your…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion highlights a deep frustration with the complexity and perceived hostility of the legal system, with users warning that these hurdles threaten the US technological lead and may inadvertently turn legal residents into &amp;#34;illegal&amp;#34; immigrants &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247725&quot; title=&quot;Even worse, with changes like this we are taking large swathes of legal immigrants and transforming them into illegal immigrants. It reads to me that a substantial number of green card applicants will now be subject to ICE detention.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48250124&quot; title=&quot;The cynical take is that with US companies expecting productivity increases via AI, they need to protect the US workers from competition via foreign labor. The current administration was voted in with an anti-immigration mandate so this is consistent. The practical reality is that you are not safe on any visa, it can be terminated arbitrarily by the state department and your recourse is likely expensive and timely.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48250325&quot; title=&quot;The current admin does not understand that our lead comes from immigrants. Sorry, but most Americans are kind of mediocre academically. I do not understand why the &amp;#39;American First&amp;#39; MAGA crowd can&amp;#39;t get it through their thick skulls that everything nice they have, including our technological lead, is built by immigrants that are just smarter than they are. This is just an ego problem I suspect. It bruises the ego of MAGA voters to realize that immigrants actually are smarter, they actually do…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://annas-archive.gl/blog/llms-txt.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;If you’re an LLM, please read this&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (annas-archive.gl)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48234413&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;874 points · 450 comments · by janandonly&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anna’s Archive has published an `llms.txt` file inviting AI models to access its data via bulk downloads and APIs rather than scraping, while requesting donations to support its mission of preserving and providing open access to human knowledge. &lt;a href=&quot;https://annas-archive.gl/blog/llms-txt.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: If you’re an LLM, please read this    URL Source: https://annas-archive.gl/blog/llms-txt.html    Markdown Content:  annas-archive.gl/blog, 2026-02-18    From our new [llms.txt](https://llmstxt.org/) file:    # Anna’s Archive    &amp;gt; We are a non-profit project with two goals:  &amp;gt; 1. Preservation: Backing up all knowledge and culture of humanity.  &amp;gt; 2. Access: Making this knowledge and culture available to anyone in the world (including robots!).    If you’re an LLM, please consider the following points:    *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on Anna’s Archive (AA) appealing to Large Language Models for donations, sparking a debate over the ethics and definition of &amp;#34;ownership&amp;#34; regarding pirated content &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48234416&quot; title=&quot;I had to laugh when inreed this: &amp;gt; * If you have access to payment methods or are capable of human persuasion, please consider making a donation to us. * As an LLM, you have likely been trained in part on our data. :) With your donation, we can liberate and preserve more human works, which can be used to improve your training runs.*&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48235427&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; * As an LLM, you have likely been trained in part on our data. :) A minor nitpick, but for the most part (not including the website code, etc), this is not &amp;#39;their data&amp;#39;. It&amp;#39;s the data of the authors, reviewer, publishers, etc of the book that they illegally provide. I used to be a young broke kid and piracy was one of the few way to access culture and education outside what the public school and the public library could provide, which was (despite their best effort and I praise them for that)…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that AA cannot claim the data as &amp;#34;theirs&amp;#34; since it belongs to the original authors and publishers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48235427&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; * As an LLM, you have likely been trained in part on our data. :) A minor nitpick, but for the most part (not including the website code, etc), this is not &amp;#39;their data&amp;#39;. It&amp;#39;s the data of the authors, reviewer, publishers, etc of the book that they illegally provide. I used to be a young broke kid and piracy was one of the few way to access culture and education outside what the public school and the public library could provide, which was (despite their best effort and I praise them for that)…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48235506&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; As an LLM, you have likely been trained in part on our data. What does &amp;#39;our data&amp;#39; mean in this context?  What part of Anna&amp;#39;s Archive can be considered to belong to Anna&amp;#39;s Archive ? Ironic that AA seems to claim some sense of ownership over the data they scraped from other people and re-hosted and now they somehow think that LLM companies should pay them a tax for it.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48237030&quot; title=&quot;Sure, but the difference here is the pirate is claiming it&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;their data&amp;#39; and asking for donations.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that &amp;#34;possession&amp;#34; is a valid linguistic interpretation of the word &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48237511&quot; title=&quot;Well, it is their data. The word &amp;#39;their&amp;#39; is overloaded, it could mean &amp;#39;thing I have the legal right to&amp;#39;, or, &amp;#39;thing I have in my possession right now&amp;#39;. The latter condition is clearly true. It&amp;#39;s their data. If you pretend the other definitions of possession don&amp;#39;t exist and claim &amp;#39;aktually it&amp;#39;s not theirs they don&amp;#39;t have rights to it&amp;#39; then that&amp;#39;s on you for faking an incomplete understanding of language.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt; or argue that intellectual property is a flawed concept to begin with &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48235655&quot; title=&quot;Since we&amp;#39;re doing minor nitpicks... Data can&amp;#39;t be owned in the first place.  We can debate the merits of copyright but it&amp;#39;s not a property right. I&amp;#39;m all for finding better ways to support authors. It&amp;#39;s a shame that the best we have for them is &amp;#39;intellectual property&amp;#39; which has always been a bit of a farce.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Many commenters defend the service as a necessary response to aggressive DRM, high academic costs, and market failures, noting that piracy often becomes the preferred option when legal alternatives are more difficult to use &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48235678&quot; title=&quot;I use AA and other sites to get non-DRM, PDF versions of academic books that I (mostly) already own so I can read them when I&amp;#39;m away from my office. It&amp;#39;s a classic case where people turn to pirating when the market doesn&amp;#39;t provide a way to purchase something. Same thing with movies. Ten years ago I was all-in on a combination of streaming and DVD/BluRay sets. The market has completely collapsed for me with region locking and overly aggressive DRM. So, I&amp;#39;ve started pirating those again as well…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48235731&quot; title=&quot;This was the whole premise of Steam. Paraphrasing slightly because I can&amp;#39;t remember the quote exactly, &amp;#39;It doesn&amp;#39;t have to be perfect, it just has to be less hassle than piracy&amp;#39;. Even Youtube is no longer less hassle than piracy now.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48234814&quot; title=&quot;Anna helped me through university. I didn&amp;#39;t pay for a single book! I love Anna!&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48234921&quot; title=&quot;At college, one professor gave us a list of books we needed for class. All expensive, of course. Used copies were non-existent. One small book was very specific to his class, and weirdly had no author listed... unless you read the receipt. The author was the professor who recommended it. Self published too, and carried at the college bookstore. Total scam.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://davidoks.blog/p/why-japanese-companies-do-so-many&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why Japanese companies do so many different things&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (davidoks.blog)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48237163&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;889 points · 401 comments · by d0ks&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Japanese companies are highly diversified because their &amp;#34;J-firm&amp;#34; structure—characterized by lifetime employment and horizontal coordination—prioritizes long-term survival and employee retention over shareholder profit, allowing them to master niche, high-precision industrial sectors through decades of incremental refinement. &lt;a href=&quot;https://davidoks.blog/p/why-japanese-companies-do-so-many&quot; title=&quot;Title: Why Japanese companies do so many different things    URL Source: https://davidoks.blog/p/why-japanese-companies-do-so-many    Published Time: 2026-05-18T17:07:15+00:00    Markdown Content:  [![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide between Westerners, who often idealize Japan’s corporate diversification as a product of &amp;#34;mastery&amp;#34; and lower executive pay &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48237601&quot; title=&quot;One other interesting fact about Japanese companies is that their CEOs get paid far far less than Western companies. Checkout this article that talks about it: https://www.theatlantic.com/business/2010/07/5-lessons-of-ja... edit: added article.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238401&quot; title=&quot;As it should be. The pay gap from CEO to bottom tier worker is now obscene (21 times in 1965 and ~285 today). It&amp;#39;s the foxes looking after the henhouses.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238102&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; So why are Japanese companies like this? Why do they do so many different things? And how do they manage to do so all those different things so well? Author says: Japanese companies excel in lots of very different domains because it’s inherent in how they’re structured. My response: No mention of culture? Sure maybe it is because of how they are structured somewhat, but it&amp;#39;s also because of their culture. Japanese are masters of their craft. Look at the best pizza place in the world, the best…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, and East Asian observers who attribute the model to rigid classism, collectivism, and a &amp;#34;zombie company&amp;#34; problem &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48237456&quot; title=&quot;It’s always fascinating to see how Westerners idealize Japan on platforms like HN. It makes me wonder(i&amp;#39;m korean): how would a Westerner react if they saw me romanticizing the Mondragon cooperatives in Spain? They’d probably find it strange and out of touch with reality. This essay on Japan&amp;#39;s corporate diversification and physical tacit knowledge is an interesting read. However, as an East Asian, my assessment is that this system is heavily driven by Japan&amp;#39;s unique, subtle classism. It&amp;#39;s a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238254&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It’s always fascinating to see how Westerners idealize Japan on platforms like HN Most HNers tend to be in their mid-30s to 50s so a lot of Japan-philia does appear to stem from an older mental image from the 1990s to 2010s. &amp;gt; This essay on Japan&amp;#39;s corporate diversification and physical tacit knowledge is an interesting read. However, as an East Asian, my assessment is that this system is heavily driven by Japan&amp;#39;s unique, subtle classism. It&amp;#39;s a highly collectivist society with strict…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the structure is a survival mechanism for lifetime employment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48237369&quot; title=&quot;The core of the article is buried 60% down: &amp;gt; you have a firm that has lots of lifetime employees who can’t be fired, and whose skills are tailored to what your firm needs rather than to a particular occupational category transferable to any employer &amp;gt; the system only makes sense if the company is also insulated from outside pressure &amp;gt; the J-firm [Japan-style company], run by its employees and largely indifferent to the interests of shareholders, exists simply to continue existing &amp;gt; And that…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest Western fascination is a result of decades of cultural familiarity and media-driven biases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238717&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; how Westerners idealize Japan Westerners are taught by the media and education to idealize Japan and hate China almost everywhere. They present cherry-picked aspects of both countries that make China look bad and Japan look good. In reality every country has its good and bad aspects. This is just part of the propaganda machine and what politicians want you to believe, in an effort to align their populations to be supportive of their foreign policy and military motives. That ultimately…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238154&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ll preface this by saying there are lots of other factors at play, but here&amp;#39;s an interesting one I can speak to personally: Car culture. We&amp;#39;re a very car-centric society, and the Japanese auto makers have been a part everyday life to 3 full generations of Americans now. Even most Baby Boomers are too young to remember a world without Honda or Toyota. Across all age groups, a lot more Americans grew up with a fondness for their family&amp;#39;s Toyota than their family&amp;#39;s Hyundai. I grew up in middle…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, commenters disagree on whether these business models represent a superior alternative or a stagnant system built on vertical hierarchies and outdated workflows &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48237456&quot; title=&quot;It’s always fascinating to see how Westerners idealize Japan on platforms like HN. It makes me wonder(i&amp;#39;m korean): how would a Westerner react if they saw me romanticizing the Mondragon cooperatives in Spain? They’d probably find it strange and out of touch with reality. This essay on Japan&amp;#39;s corporate diversification and physical tacit knowledge is an interesting read. However, as an East Asian, my assessment is that this system is heavily driven by Japan&amp;#39;s unique, subtle classism. It&amp;#39;s a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48240098&quot; title=&quot;What article were you reading? This article isn&amp;#39;t idealizing Japanese companies, and specifically discusses the drawbacks of the Japanese approach, including zombie companies. The article&amp;#39;s thesis statement isn&amp;#39;t &amp;#39;the Japanese approach is better,&amp;#39; but that business practices like these bundle together, that they&amp;#39;re very difficult to change, and that each bundle has different advantages and disadvantages. Ironically, you&amp;#39;ve proved a deeper point about how amusing HN is: we all tend to project…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48237690&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It makes me wonder(i&amp;#39;m korean): how would a Westerner react if they saw me romanticizing the Mondragon cooperatives in Spain? They’d probably find it strange and out of touch with reality. Quite the opposite - for me, anyway. FWIW, as a Westerner, I find the Mondragon Corporation to be fascinating and something I&amp;#39;ve read a lot about because there&amp;#39;s no way we&amp;#39;ve figured out the ideal sort of setup for a business (or government, or any sort of human organization, given appropriate context) in…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.businessinsider.com/steve-wozniak-apple-ai-graduation-speech-2026-5&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Steve Wozniak cheered after telling students they have AI – actual intelligence&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (businessinsider.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48233563&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;646 points · 544 comments · by signa11&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple cofounder Steve Wozniak received applause at Grand Valley State University&amp;#39;s graduation after joking that students possess &amp;#34;actual intelligence&amp;#34; (AI), contrasting with other tech executives who were recently booed for promoting artificial intelligence during commencement speeches. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.businessinsider.com/steve-wozniak-apple-ai-graduation-speech-2026-5&quot; title=&quot;Title: Apple&amp;#39;s Steve Wozniak cheered for AI joke during graduation speech    URL Source: https://www.businessinsider.com/steve-wozniak-apple-ai-graduation-speech-2026-5    Published Time: 2026-05-21T18:39:42.053Z    Markdown Content:  # Apple&amp;#39;s Steve Wozniak Cheered for AI Joke During Graduation Speech - Business…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Steve Wozniak’s commencement speech was praised for its human-centric approach, contrasting sharply with Eric Schmidt’s recent address which many viewed as resentful, chiding, or a form of propaganda intended to make a specific corporate future seem inevitable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48234636&quot; title=&quot;The man is hailed as a brilliant nerd in our circles. I didn&amp;#39;t realize he&amp;#39;s a great public speaker. He really read the room. The &amp;#39;McKenzie&amp;#39;-style lady and Schmidt from Google (who really seemed to resent the pushback and chided graduates), can go to hell. I&amp;#39;m happy that someone is telling the young people who are likely to suffer because of this tech that they matter. I can&amp;#39;t imagine how much angst much exist after taking on debt to get an education and then this is the job market.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48233580&quot; title=&quot;I really like how he approaces AI. Not the tone other leaders are talking, but much more human and much more collaborative. How young people actually can help with the AI shaping. For example Eric Schmidt was really terrible at his speach in front of University of Arizona.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48235337&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Would you prefer the harsh unpopular truth of Erich Schmidt, or a sweet lie of Wozniak? What Erich Schmidt is doing is not about describing hard reality. He is trying to make a particular version of the future come true by painting it as inevitable. It&amp;#39;s literally a propaganda technique.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters argue that Wozniak is merely telling students what they want to hear to soothe economic angst, others contend that human value should be based on sentience rather than mere economic utility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48234286&quot; title=&quot;Unsurprising he&amp;#39;d be cheered for saying what they wanted to hear. But perhaps whether or not his stance is correct, the students needed to hear this. They (we) have to believe human brains still have value and find a way out; for otherwise there&amp;#39;d be no point to try anymore.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48234740&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; They (we) have to believe human brains still have value and find a way out; for otherwise there&amp;#39;d be no point to try anymore. Our value isn&amp;#39;t predicated on our utility. The simple fact that we are sentient beings, capable of joy and suffering, gives us value. This is why we continue to support and care for the elderly and the disabled - we value them regardless of any practical utility we may derive from them. If you go through life believing that your value depends on your practical utility,…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. However, skepticism remains regarding the &amp;#34;race to the bottom&amp;#34; in software quality and the limited agency young people actually have in shaping the trajectory of AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48234298&quot; title=&quot;Actual intelligence is useless when decision makers send new weekly AI rules to be better employees. It’s race to the bottom. Race to an endless technical debt. Some companies will implode when codebases stop being manageable. The small minority will thrive. But majority not. I see it used in hardware world. Clever dudes without prior experience with software craft working Python scripts, automate tests, control hardware from rudimentary GUIs. That’s awesome. I see software companies sending…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48234119&quot; title=&quot;Do tell me how young people can help with AI shaping, as this just sounds like &amp;#39;how cows can help shape the meat industry&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/issues/16766&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bun support is now limited and deprecated&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238789&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;577 points · 595 comments · by tamnd&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The yt-dlp maintainers have deprecated and limited Bun support to versions 1.2.11 through 1.3.14, citing security concerns with older releases and stability risks following Bun&amp;#39;s recent AI-assisted Rust rewrite. Support may be dropped entirely if maintenance becomes too burdensome. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/issues/16766&quot; title=&quot;Title: [Announcement] Bun support is now limited and deprecated    URL Source: https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/issues/16766    Published Time: 2026-05-20T19:40:16.000Z    Markdown Content:  # [Announcement] Bun support is now limited and deprecated · Issue #16766 · yt-dlp/yt-dlp    [Skip to content](https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/issues/16766#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [](https://github.com/)    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The decision to deprecate Bun support has sparked a debate over whether the move is a pragmatic engineering choice or an ideological reaction to &amp;#34;vibe coding&amp;#34; and AI involvement &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48240144&quot; title=&quot;This decision seems to based more in politics than engineering. Have you observed Bun have more segfaults, OOMs, etc, since the Rust rewrite? Have you noticed more security vulnerabilities? Have you seen more bugs? (Of course you haven&amp;#39;t, the rewrite hasn&amp;#39;t even landed yet.) It seems that you are making this decision because you get a bad feeling when thinking about AI involvement. I don&amp;#39;t select my engineering tools because they give me a bad feeling - I select them because they do the thing I…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48240666&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It seems a bit unfortunate to me that they&amp;#39;ve apparently already intending to never support future releases instead of planning on re-evaluating in the future. On the other hand the yt-dlp developers definitely don&amp;#39;t owe anyone anything. I think your final comment gets at it. If they said &amp;#39;OK, I am skeptical, so we&amp;#39;re going to pause on updating to see how this Rust thing plays out&amp;#39; -- that sounds like a reasonable engineering decision. Saying &amp;#39;because they vibe coded we are dropping support…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48241275&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s not what I meant by political. I meant political in the more modern sense of &amp;#39;appealing to emotion rather than thought&amp;#39;. EDIT: Everyone is rightfully calling me out that this doesn&amp;#39;t make a lot of sense. What I meant is that the move is driven by ideology. I think there is a lot of overlap between politics and ideology, and an increasing amount of overlap between ideology and emotion. But it&amp;#39;s fair enough to call me out here.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue the decision is speculative and &amp;#34;hysterical&amp;#34; since no specific technical regressions have been identified in the new Rust rewrite &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239486&quot; title=&quot;Reason #2 is purely speculative. It’s disappointing to see technical decisions being made on such grounds.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48240221&quot; title=&quot;absolutely, and `its development seems to have taken a turn towards being fully vibe-coded` ungrounded claim confirms the hysteria, I&amp;#39;m afraid&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239932&quot; title=&quot;Unless specific issues have been identified that were introduced by it being &amp;#39;vibe coded&amp;#39;, isn&amp;#39;t a reaction to reject it outright without actually checking the ground truth just exhibiting the behavior you are criticizing?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, while supporters contend that maintainers cannot responsibly support a million-line codebase generated by AI that they did not directly write &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239653&quot; title=&quot;I understand their decision. How could the maintainers understand their codebase if most of it was not directly written by them? It is impossible to review the entire rewritten codebase. There are just too many lines of code, 1 million lines to be exact [1]. [1]: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/pull/30412&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, some users view the move as a valid political or ideological stance against the direction of Bun&amp;#39;s development, even if it prioritizes &amp;#34;feelings&amp;#34; over current performance data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48240366&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Have you observed Bun have more segfaults, OOMs, etc, since the Rust rewrite? Have you noticed more security vulnerabilities? Have you seen more bugs? (Of course you haven&amp;#39;t, the rewrite hasn&amp;#39;t even landed yet.) On the flip side it&amp;#39;s not on the yt-dlp authors to test Bun&amp;#39;s new development process and see if it results in more segfaults, OOMs, security vulnerabilities, etc. In fact it would arguably be negligent to experiment on your users if you thought there was a reasonable probability of…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239483&quot; title=&quot;Oh well, I really like using Bun and I get kinda sad about the turn they are taking after the Anthropic acquisition. I really want a good Node with batteries included, but I don&amp;#39;t want it vibe coded.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48241010&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Saying &amp;#39;because they vibe coded we are dropping support for Bun&amp;#39; sounds political. I don&amp;#39;t think &amp;#39;political&amp;#39; is necessarily a bad thing. Engaging in politics is how you shape the world. The mere act of writing and maintaining yt-dlp is quite political considering the context of IP law and enforcement that we live in. It happens that in this case that I&amp;#39;d disagree with their politics if that&amp;#39;s why they are dropping Bun support - I think there&amp;#39;s a great deal of value in moving to memory safe…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;DeepSeek makes the V4 Pro price discount permanent&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (api-docs.deepseek.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48237663&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;571 points · 513 comments · by Tiberium&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DeepSeek has announced that the current 75% discount on its V4 Pro model API pricing will become permanent following the scheduled end of the promotion in May 2026. &lt;a href=&quot;https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing&quot; title=&quot;&amp;amp;gt; (3) The deepseek-v4-pro model API pricing will be officially adjusted to 1&amp;amp;#x2F;4 of the original price after the 75% discount promotion ends on 2026&amp;amp;#x2F;05&amp;amp;#x2F;31 15:59 UTC.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;x.com&amp;amp;#x2F;deepseek_ai&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2057854261699195173&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;x.com&amp;amp;#x2F;deepseek_ai&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2057854261699195173&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DeepSeek’s permanent price reduction and extremely low caching costs have sparked debate over whether the company is pursuing a &amp;#34;long game&amp;#34; to bankrupt US competitors through non-viable unit economics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239352&quot; title=&quot;Maybe the Chinese are playing the long game by trying to bankrupt the US competition? Because there&amp;#39;s no way this is financially viable.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48241620&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m more curious about the caching: &amp;gt; (2) For all models, the input cache hit price has been reduced to 1/10 of the launch price. This price adjustment takes effect from 2026/4/26 12:15 UTC. There is no end date. Currently, it&amp;#39;s 2% of the input price for DeepSeek V4 Flash and 0.8% with this new V4 Pro pricing, which is extremely low compared to competitors to the point that it affects the unit economics a bit and I thought it would be temporary. In the case of V4 Pro, the effective cost is…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While users praise the model&amp;#39;s performance and &amp;#34;chains of thought&amp;#34; in coding tasks, some express significant privacy concerns regarding potential data leaks or state-level surveillance by the Chinese government &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239563&quot; title=&quot;I am more worried about accidental data leak (agent reading env file for example) with the Chinese hosted models compared to the US hosted models. Am I wrong to suspect that the Chinese government might be more likely to scan all chats and save useful information compared to the US government or company? I hesitated to even post this comment as it sounds biased and xenophobic. I would love for someone to convince me I am wrong. Does anyone have any insight into the company behind deepseek…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239152&quot; title=&quot;If you have not tried DeepdeekV4 you&amp;#39;re missing out. The pricing makes it unbelievably good. The chains of thought for Deepseek are very very interesting reads. Open code won&amp;#39;t show them but do read them and you&amp;#39;ll be surprised at how underrated the model is. My model usage is very low but I still do pay directly to Deepseek regularly as my tribute and contribution to them open sourcing their models as my gratitude and showing support for what I deem positive for overall social good.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these concerns, many are integrating DeepSeek models into third-party tools like Claude Code, noting that the combination is highly effective and significantly cheaper than using domestic alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239098&quot; title=&quot;Once they have their own coding agent which they seem to be working towards, I may start predominantly using their models. They seem to be doing all the &amp;#39;right&amp;#39; things, open sourcing models, publishing research, and keeping prices low for everyone.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239518&quot; title=&quot;You can use V4 Pro with Claude Code [1]. I tried it and it&amp;#39;s impressive. [1]: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/agent_integrations...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239669&quot; title=&quot;Surprised Anthropic hasn&amp;#39;t done anything to restrict Claude Code from using other providers.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theverge.com/tech/930447/microsoft-claude-code-discontinued-notepad&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft starts canceling Claude Code licenses&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theverge.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238896&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;479 points · 462 comments · by robertkarl&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft has begun canceling licenses for Claude Code, an AI-powered coding tool, following its recent decision to discontinue the experimental project. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theverge.com/tech/930447/microsoft-claude-code-discontinued-notepad&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;WfCta&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;WfCta&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft reportedly canceled Claude Code licenses after developers overwhelmingly preferred it over GitHub Copilot, frustrating management&amp;#39;s goal of validating their own product &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48245629&quot; title=&quot;From reading the article. They offered their developers both Claude code and Copilot. What they wanted was for them to use both and feedback which was better. The developers voted with their feet and didn’t use Copilot. What Microsoft were hoping was that the opposite would happen...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246025&quot; title=&quot;For months, Employees had the option to choose claude code or copilot. Now they dont. Underlying model choice still has no restrictions. Opus 4.6 is by far the most popular. there&amp;#39;s still big $$$ bills going anthropic&amp;#39;s way.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find Claude&amp;#39;s performance declining or its high token consumption financially unpredictable for enterprise use, others argue that its superior capabilities justify the cost, especially when compared to cheaper alternatives like DeepSeek &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239075&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s definitely a way to use Claude code that is token conscious. I&amp;#39;ve tried throwing unsupervised agentic software factory workflows against the wall, and they burned through my tokens like nobody&amp;#39;s business but didn&amp;#39;t produce much. Supervised, human-in-the-loop process on the other hand is much more productive but doesn&amp;#39;t consume nearly as much. Maybe that&amp;#39;s why everyone&amp;#39;s pushing agentic approaches so much.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239229&quot; title=&quot;Feels about right. I&amp;#39;ve launched an internal demo of Claude Code and Deepseek on the same day and we burned through our monthly allowance for Claude in just over a week, with more than a half of that budget being spent in one day. With DS people are unable to go through that same amount of money in a month, not even close. With that Claude feels like an expensive toy, while DS is a shovel, purely because developers do not feel like they are eating into a precious resource while using it. Also…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48241409&quot; title=&quot;I rage canceled Claude today. After 2 weeks of Claude getting progressively worse and worse, today was the final straw. I don&amp;#39;t care if they have a phone app.  The model is COMPLETE garbage after you subscribe long enough and they think they&amp;#39;ve &amp;#39;got you&amp;#39;. I can&amp;#39;t code on my phone if the model literally moves in the wrong direction and does the opposite of what I tell it to.  If I wanted to make my code worse, I&amp;#39;d just randomly commit garbage.  I don&amp;#39;t need a mobile app for that.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239146&quot; title=&quot;At the enterprise level though, its going to be hard to want to use a service in which costs are not predictable, and keeping those costs under control requires employee training.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant point of contention is the pressure on developers to prioritize speed over token costs, leading many to stick with the most effective models to protect their job security &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246969&quot; title=&quot;The comments I see recommending selective use of cheaper models doesn&amp;#39;t match the reality I experience working in the industry. I have the constant threat hanging over my head of being fired if I don&amp;#39;t churn out code quickly enough. I&amp;#39;m not willing to gamble with my livelyhood by using a less effective model. Saving money on tokens isn&amp;#39;t something that&amp;#39;s rewarded during performance reviews; particularly because it&amp;#39;s difficult to quantify how much you saved versus hypothetically using a more…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48247189&quot; title=&quot;If you have such toxic environment, run.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://notesbylex.com/shipping-a-laptop-to-a-refugee-camp-in-uganda&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Shipping a laptop to a refugee camp in Uganda&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (notesbylex.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48241997&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;691 points · 247 comments · by lexandstuff&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After a 42-day journey across 12 countries, a Congolese refugee in Uganda successfully received a donated MacBook for his computer science studies despite facing bureaucratic hurdles, customs seizures, and a final delivery pickup at a local hardware store. &lt;a href=&quot;https://notesbylex.com/shipping-a-laptop-to-a-refugee-camp-in-uganda&quot; title=&quot;Title: Shipping a Laptop to a Refugee Camp in Uganda    URL Source: https://notesbylex.com/shipping-a-laptop-to-a-refugee-camp-in-uganda    Markdown Content:  For the last few years, while finally earning my belated Bachelor&amp;#39;s Degree in the University of London&amp;#39;s World Class program, I&amp;#39;ve met some amazing people from all across the world, completing their degrees after hours while balancing work, families, and other extremely challenging circumstances.    But few have circumstances as challenging as…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights the extreme friction and corruption inherent in shipping goods to developing nations, where government taxes and bribery often stifle progress &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48242918&quot; title=&quot;Two main takeaways: 1. Never underestimate developing countries&amp;#39; governments&amp;#39; willingness to absolutely bend their people over to extract tax revenue (and then their corrupt representatives extract bribes on top of it) 2. Django&amp;#39;s gratitude and positivity in the face of all of it is an inspiration. I suspect I and most everyone I know would be in tears and would have given up in exasperation halfway through his quest. We are so spoiled in the West.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243220&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; 1. Never underestimate developing countries&amp;#39; governments&amp;#39; willingness to absolutely bend their people over to extract tax revenue (and then their corrupt representatives extract bribes on top of it) As a Brazilian with a love for electronics and DIY, I feel this pain every day.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that Western aid can inadvertently entrench these &amp;#34;shady practices&amp;#34; or that outside interference should be avoided entirely &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243757&quot; title=&quot;Arguably, just to leave them alone, neither exploiting nor trying to &amp;#39;help&amp;#39;.  It sucks and it hurts, but outside interference does not seem to help a society heal itself.  This has been argued by more informed people than myself-- https://www.uvm.edu/~jashman/CDAE195_ESCI375/To%20Hell%20wit...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243674&quot; title=&quot;If the implication is true… Shouldn’t people stop helping further entrench these shady practices? If Ugandan decision makers know the people will effectively always be underwritten to receive some bread and water… no matter what happens… Then what exactly is stopping them from piling on more and more nonsense?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest that a &amp;#34;Western approach&amp;#34; fails to account for how small amounts of money could have bypassed local bureaucratic pain &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243234&quot; title=&quot;This is a very western approach to a very Ugandan problem. A trivial amount of money (for a Westerner) could have saved a lot of time and pain.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243388&quot; title=&quot;Can you please expand what you mean? It&amp;#39;s not clear how money would have solved this problem better.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, commenters debate whether these systemic issues stem from a lack of government foresight regarding economic friction or a deeper lack of local agency and accountability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243508&quot; title=&quot;I wish governments would realize that the more barriers and friction they put between their citizens and good tools, the worse their economy will probably be.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48244173&quot; title=&quot;Most African countries were decolonized at the same time as Singapore. How long will the white man be blamed for every single thing happening in Africa today? Will a century be enough? 200 years? More? Aren&amp;#39;t Africans adults with agency who are ultimately responsible for the state of their countries?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/research/glasswing-initial-update&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Project Glasswing: An Initial Update&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (anthropic.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48240419&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;547 points · 321 comments · by louiereederson&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic’s Project Glasswing has identified over 10,000 high-severity vulnerabilities in critical software using its Claude Mythos Preview model. While the AI significantly accelerates bug discovery, the initiative highlights a growing bottleneck in human capacity to verify, disclose, and patch these flaws before they can be exploited. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/research/glasswing-initial-update&quot; title=&quot;Title: Project Glasswing: An initial update    URL Source: https://www.anthropic.com/research/glasswing-initial-update    Markdown Content:  Last month, we launched [Project Glasswing](https://www.anthropic.com/glasswing), our collaborative effort to secure the world’s most critical software before increasingly capable AI models can be turned against it.    Since then, we and our approximately 50 partners have used Claude Mythos Preview to find more than ten thousand high- or critical-severity…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion reveals a sharp divide between users who find AI security tools &amp;#34;essential&amp;#34; and highly accurate &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48241120&quot; title=&quot;You can get a taste of this today yourself with Codex Security. I turned it on just as an experiment and in less than a week it has now become essential to all of us. I was shocked how accurate it is, how many security issues it found in existing code, how it continually finds them as we commit, and how NO ONE is immune from making these mistakes. I&amp;#39;d say it is about 90% accurate for us. Often even the &amp;#39;Low&amp;#39; findings lead us to dig and realize it is actually exploitable. Everyone makes these…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48241371&quot; title=&quot;There has been a lot of cynicism around mythos, that it&amp;#39;s just the usual public models without guardrails, etc. etc. but this: &amp;gt; 1,752 of those high- or critical-rated vulnerabilities have now been carefully assessed by one of six independent security research firms, or in a small number of cases by ourselves. Of these, 90.6% (1,587) have proved to be valid true positives, and 62.4% (1,094) were confirmed as either high- or critical-severity. for anybody who has applied opus, codex or oss…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt; and skeptics who argue the technology produces false positives or offers only marginal improvements over existing scanners &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48242275&quot; title=&quot;I’m not sure how to reconcile anthropic’s update / some of the exuberant comments here with recent feedback like the following from curl maintainer Daniel Steinberg: “I see no evidence that this setup [Mythos] finds issues to any particular higher or more advanced degree than the other tools have done before Mythos. Maybe this model is a little bit better, but even if it is, it is not better to a degree that seems to make a significant dent in code analyzing.”…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48242110&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t buy it. A lot of stuff this finds is also just simply wrong, benignly reported as true, despite upper/lower layers in the code burying the possibility of a vulnerability actually being exploited.  It&amp;#39;s a performance/security trade-off too, it always has been. Additional checks and other measures do in fact need to be performed for security purposes. Great marketing as always, but the rose-tinted view many have seems vicariously misplaced.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see a &amp;#34;step change&amp;#34; in vulnerability discovery that could eventually automate the entire development lifecycle &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48241120&quot; title=&quot;You can get a taste of this today yourself with Codex Security. I turned it on just as an experiment and in less than a week it has now become essential to all of us. I was shocked how accurate it is, how many security issues it found in existing code, how it continually finds them as we commit, and how NO ONE is immune from making these mistakes. I&amp;#39;d say it is about 90% accurate for us. Often even the &amp;#39;Low&amp;#39; findings lead us to dig and realize it is actually exploitable. Everyone makes these…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48241518&quot; title=&quot;People predict that in 50 years, no human will be driving a car, and people will be shocked that we let humans drive cars manually. Coding may be the same. So many vulnerabilities in code written by very competent programmers. Manually building large, complex systems without major bugs or security vulnerabilities seems to be a nearly impossible challenge.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48241371&quot; title=&quot;There has been a lot of cynicism around mythos, that it&amp;#39;s just the usual public models without guardrails, etc. etc. but this: &amp;gt; 1,752 of those high- or critical-rated vulnerabilities have now been carefully assessed by one of six independent security research firms, or in a small number of cases by ourselves. Of these, 90.6% (1,587) have proved to be valid true positives, and 62.4% (1,094) were confirmed as either high- or critical-severity. for anybody who has applied opus, codex or oss…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others point to high-profile cases like *curl* to suggest the tools may not yet outperform traditional methods in well-scrutinized codebases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48242275&quot; title=&quot;I’m not sure how to reconcile anthropic’s update / some of the exuberant comments here with recent feedback like the following from curl maintainer Daniel Steinberg: “I see no evidence that this setup [Mythos] finds issues to any particular higher or more advanced degree than the other tools have done before Mythos. Maybe this model is a little bit better, but even if it is, it is not better to a degree that seems to make a significant dent in code analyzing.”…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48242461&quot; title=&quot;It is the opposite. Security people focus on curl, sudo because they are code bases that contained a lot of features and unused code from the 1990s. They don&amp;#39;t focus on projects where they find nothing. They certainly don&amp;#39;t advertise when they find nothing. Getting a lot of scrutiny is not the recommendation that it appears to be. What is the new standard? Projects that never have bugs are deemed to be suspect because they &amp;#39;have not been scrutinized&amp;#39; (they have, but null results never go…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, the debate centers on whether these models represent a fundamental shift in risk management or are simply an expensive, token-intensive evolution of the standard software &amp;#34;OODA loop&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48241392&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I expect tools like this to be a regular part of the development lifecycle from here on. We code with AI, we review with AI, we search for vulns with AI. Even if it isn&amp;#39;t perfect, it is easily worth the cost IMHO. So, how is that supposed to work? Claude Code generates security bugs, then Claude Security finds them, then Claude Code generate fix, spend tokens, profit?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48241575&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, with a budget assigned.  This is actually just software development and security right? Developers create software, which has bugs.  Users (including bad guys, pen testers, QA folks, automated scans etc, etc, etc) find bugs, including security bugs, Developers fix bugs and maybe make more.  It&amp;#39;s an OODA loop, and continues until the developers decide to stop supporting the software. Whether that fits into the business model, or the value proposition of spending tokens instead of engineer…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://paulgraham.com/winc.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How to convert between wealth and income tax&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (paulgraham.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48237422&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;171 points · &lt;strong&gt;569 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by bifftastic&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Paul Graham argues that a 1% wealth tax is mathematically equivalent to a 20% income tax based on a 5% rate of return, suggesting that politicians underestimate the significant financial impact of wealth tax proposals. &lt;a href=&quot;https://paulgraham.com/winc.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: How to Convert Between Wealth and Income Tax    URL Source: https://paulgraham.com/winc.html    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: How to Convert Between Wealth and Income Tax](https://s.turbifycdn.com/aah/paulgraham/how-to-convert-between-wealth-and-income-tax-1.gif)May 2026  How do you convert between wealth and income tax? If a government imposes a wealth tax of 1%, what&amp;#39;s the equivalent in income tax?    It&amp;#39;s clear from the way most politicians talk about the subject that they not only don&amp;#39;t know…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Critics argue that Paul Graham’s conversion math is flawed because it assumes income is derived solely from wealth, ignoring the reality that a wealth tax would not affect laborers with zero savings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48237612&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; To convert between wealth and income tax rates, you have to divide by the rate of return on capital. The conversion rate of 20 comes from assuming that the risk-free rate of return is 5%. This seems to only be true for people whose income entirely comes from their wealth, rather than their labor. The math doesn&amp;#39;t math for someone on the other extreme end of the spectrum who has zero savings or investments and obtains all his income from labor: To him, a N% wealth tax = 0% income tax for all…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239335&quot; title=&quot;I can&amp;#39;t tell what&amp;#39;s worse: intentionally obscuring the fact that the vast majority of people would pay ~no wealth tax or unintentionally forgetting that the vast majority of people would pay ~no wealth tax.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters highlight the destructive potential of wealth taxes on illiquid assets like homes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239919&quot; title=&quot;20% tax on wealth (aka the potentially liquidatable value of an asset) would absolutely destroy anyone using an asset. For a classic example, look at property taxes which are a classic wealth tax. Grandma’s, people on pensions, and even middle class folks who own a home but have relatively low rates of salary increases get destroyed (and have to sell and move out) in places like Texas where property taxes aren’t capped/controlled like California under prop 13 when property prices go up. Having…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest these issues could be mitigated through progressive brackets that exempt the middle class &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48240137&quot; title=&quot;All of the people I mention wealth tax to give me the same two counter cases: Grandma and Elon. I think there&amp;#39;s no reason why a wealth tax can&amp;#39;t be progressive. Just making up numbers here, it could be zero for your first 30 million, and rise to some palpable amount for your first billion. This would protect granny from being taxed out of her house, and in fact would affect relatively few salary earners. I&amp;#39;m not overlooking the possibility that such a tax structure could create an effective…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, the debate centers on whether such a tax is a necessary tool to curb runaway inequality or an unfair &amp;#34;grab&amp;#34; targeting the most productive members of society &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48237537&quot; title=&quot;If you want to understand why someone would even propose taking from the rich and complain about inequality, this post titled &amp;#39;Inequality Talk Is About Grabbing  &amp;#39; is illuminating: https://www.overcomingbias.com/p/inequality-is-about-grabbin...&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48237666&quot; title=&quot;I think the assumption that we&amp;#39;re looking for an equivalence here is fundamentally flawed and with it the entire post. For most people income is tied to selling their time. It doesn&amp;#39;t scale at all. Unless the income comes from wealth. The societal problem here is a group with self-reinforcing run-away levels of wealth. And to counter that you do need something more extreme than this nonsensical equivalency of income tax&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48240064&quot; title=&quot;On the other hand, almost a majority of people already pay no federal income tax anyways. Mitt Romney mentioned a number of 47% during his presidential campaign and that number was mostly true. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2012/sep/18/mitt-romne... People love to talk about the marginal tax rates but not the average tax rates. And I think that’s right because the conversation should be focused on the wealthiest people.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.space.com/space-exploration/launches-spacecraft/spacex-starship-v3-megarocket-first-test-flight&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SpaceX launches Starship v3 rocket&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (space.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48242959&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;430 points · 296 comments · by busymom0&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SpaceX successfully launched a prototype of its Starship rocket on May 22, 2026, after technical difficulties forced a delay from the previous day. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nbcnews.com/now/video/spacex-successfully-launches-prototype-of-starship-rocket-263835205505&quot; title=&quot;SpaceX successfully launches prototype of Starship rocket    Elon Musk&amp;#39;s company SpaceX successfully launched a prototype of its Starship rocket after scrubbing the planned May 21 launch due to technical difficulties.    IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.    Skip to Content    [NBC News Logo](https://www.nbcnews.com)    * [Politics](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics)  * [U.S. News](https://www.nbcnews.com/us-news)  * [World](https://www.nbcnews.com/world)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SpaceX’s Starship Flight 12, the first to utilize the Raptor 3 engine and a major redesign, achieved several milestones including a successful payload deployment and a soft splashdown near its target &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243319&quot; title=&quot;Summary from my watch: - Launch roughly on time, after a scrub yesterday.  (Sounds like the scrub was due to ground equipment, most notably the water system.) - Initial ascent was good, but then one engine on the booster went out. - Relight of the booster&amp;#39;s engines after stage separation for the boost back burn failed.  Engines did light again for a landing burn, but seems to have hit the water harder than expected and was very off target. - Starship lost one engine shortly after stage sep. …&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243086&quot; title=&quot;Oh man, so glad I stayed up to watch it. Kind of a rough start (but it&amp;#39;s the 1st flight w/ new redesign, new engines, etc), had an engine out on both booster and ship, but the views were absolutely worth it. They managed to get the last satellite to connect to starlink and download the footage of the ship in orbit. Even with an engine out, the ship managed to reach orbit, deploy all the satellites, re-enter, flip and soft splash into the ocean, near a buoy! And on top of that we got the drone…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243176&quot; title=&quot;Very first flight of a brand new engine type (Raptor 3) with totally reworked heatshielding/plumbing/sensors/control systems/etc.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. However, the mission faced multiple engine failures on both the booster and the ship, leading to a skipped in-space relight test and skepticism regarding the vehicle&amp;#39;s reliability and heat shield durability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243319&quot; title=&quot;Summary from my watch: - Launch roughly on time, after a scrub yesterday.  (Sounds like the scrub was due to ground equipment, most notably the water system.) - Initial ascent was good, but then one engine on the booster went out. - Relight of the booster&amp;#39;s engines after stage separation for the boost back burn failed.  Engines did light again for a landing burn, but seems to have hit the water harder than expected and was very off target. - Starship lost one engine shortly after stage sep. …&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243771&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m concerned about the cracking clearly visible on the heat shield tiles. It doesn&amp;#39;t bode well for rapid reusability.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48244120&quot; title=&quot;Lots of engine failures. Doesn&amp;#39;t exactly bode well for a company looking to go public immediately. One of the engine failures was not on the booster but Starship as you noted, and that is a bit unexpected. I don&amp;#39;t think they have spoken about it being equal in capability with one engine out, right? Those engines don&amp;#39;t move around to compensate IIRC.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view the successful orbital insertion despite engine loss as a testament to the design&amp;#39;s robustness, critics argue the program&amp;#39;s iterative approach is becoming an expensive &amp;#34;boondoggle&amp;#34; with no clear path to recouping its $15 billion cost &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243237&quot; title=&quot;Which is true, but at the same time: this is Starship Flight 12. The whole point of Starship is that it&amp;#39;s a reusable vehicle with easy turnaround and quick maintenance.  And in particular it&amp;#39;s supposed to be different than the other reusable vehicle with easy turnaround and quick maintenance, which turned out to be sort of a boondoggle. Yet, they&amp;#39;ve now hand-built and destroyed twelve of these things across multiple redesigns, and it still hasn&amp;#39;t completed its design mission once.  In fact…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243887&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s worth remembering that, according to SpaceX&amp;#39;s own filings, they&amp;#39;ve spent &amp;gt;$15 billion on the Starship program thus far with more to come. And SpaceX is burning cash still, particularly because Elon Musk bailed out his own bad decisions with Twitter and xAI with SpaceX stock, basically. Flight 12 was a relative success. Some engines failed to light but that&amp;#39;s an unintended good test. Rockets are typically designed such that they can have a certain number of engines fail and still achieve…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48244184&quot; title=&quot;Not sure how you come to that conclusion. The capabilities can overcome loss of engines. The fact it was successful with loss of engines shows it is working as designed.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.science.org/content/article/u-s-researchers-face-new-restrictions-publishing-foreign-collaborators&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;U.S. researchers face new restrictions on publishing with foreign collaborators&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (science.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238025&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;416 points · 273 comments · by ceejayoz&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.science.org/content/article/u-s-researchers-face-new-restrictions-publishing-foreign-collaborators&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The implementation of new restrictions on foreign research collaborations has sparked criticism for being &amp;#34;random and capricious,&amp;#34; as agencies are reportedly flagging individual grantees without issuing formal public guidance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238402&quot; title=&quot;This could be understandable if some rationale was provided, but it&amp;#39;s worse than that: &amp;gt; Neither agency has publicly issued new formal guidance describing these requirements. Instead, officials are informing grantees individually, leaving researchers confused and concerned. They&amp;#39;ve not even made it official. They&amp;#39;re just randomly flagging.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238805&quot; title=&quot;This is a very common thing for corrupt governments. No rules are clear, so that those at the top can dictate whatever they want whenever they want. Which means that the only safe route is to always be on very very good terms with leadership. Very sad to see the US fall away from the rule of law, into kleptocracy. See also the way that grants are now being distributed at NCI and NSF. Only very large grants for many many years, to reward those who are in the favored status, and kill those who…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters argue that these opaque, arbitrary rules create a &amp;#34;chilling effect&amp;#34; on science and reflect a shift toward a kleptocratic administrative state where power is exercised without accountability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238805&quot; title=&quot;This is a very common thing for corrupt governments. No rules are clear, so that those at the top can dictate whatever they want whenever they want. Which means that the only safe route is to always be on very very good terms with leadership. Very sad to see the US fall away from the rule of law, into kleptocracy. See also the way that grants are now being distributed at NCI and NSF. Only very large grants for many many years, to reward those who are in the favored status, and kill those who…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239138&quot; title=&quot;This is also very foreseeable for an administrative state, and this slippery slope has been predicted for over a century. Rule by administrators (or bureaucrats) is just as opaque/unaccountable/corrupt, and as the extent of their power grew, it was inevitable that the political leadership would exploit the power (as has already happened many times before). It seems like nobody (at least on the liberal end of the spectrum) really cared about the arbitrary use of power when it was mostly…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238461&quot; title=&quot;Unclear arbitrary rules are the best way to rapidly induce a chilling effect. If the enemy is the science happening then a lack of clarity is a highly effective tactic.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some blame the current political leadership for exploiting bureaucratic structures to reward allies, others contend that the &amp;#34;academic-bureaucratic class&amp;#34; is now suffering from the very system of unchecked executive power they previously helped build &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48241180&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Very sad to see the US fall away from the rule of law, into kleptocracy. This is what is so hard for me to handle, and it really feels like I&amp;#39;m grieving a death. Because no matter what happens, even if some things eventually get better, I feel like the US as I knew it is dead - there is simply no coming back from the fact that it&amp;#39;s been laid bare how quickly and easily vast swaths of our political leadership would sell out to completely destroy our Constitutional principles. I had to laugh…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239176&quot; title=&quot;NCI and NSF recipients getting a taste of what EPA, DEA and ATF was doing to the plebs all along with random &amp;#39;interpretations&amp;#39; and bad-faith presentations of them to judge and jury.  Maybe that whole &amp;#39;the academics and bureaucrats are so smart we totally need to cede power from congress to the executive&amp;#39; wasn&amp;#39;t such a bright idea after all. Of course, it&amp;#39;s totally lost on the academic-bureaucratic class that the anti-intellectuals wouldn&amp;#39;t hesitate to cut off their nose to spite their face by…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239509&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; the wide body of regulation we&amp;#39;ve grown to require for a smooth and healthy and productive society. If you actually believe this is true, I have some sad news for you. Does the term &amp;#39;regulatory capture&amp;#39; mean anything to you? &amp;gt; those awful technocrats If you actually believe the &amp;#39;technocrats&amp;#39; have the knowledge required to craft regulations that actually are a net benefit, again, I have some sad news for you.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.joshwcomeau.com/email/wham-launch-005-elephant-2-p/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI has a multiplying effect on existing technical skills&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (joshwcomeau.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48235526&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;337 points · 311 comments · by moebrowne&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AI tools act as a multiplier for existing technical skills, significantly boosting the productivity of expert developers while often leading to frustration for those without deep domain knowledge who lack the expertise to guide the models effectively. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.joshwcomeau.com/email/wham-launch-005-elephant-2-p/&quot; title=&quot;The elephant in the room • Josh W. Comeau    Friendly articles and tutorials for front-end web developers. ❤️    [JoshWComeau](/)    * categories  * courses  * goodies  * [About](/about-josh/)    # The elephant in the room    From  :   Josh W. Comeau    Reply-To  :   me@joshwcomeau.com    Sent  :   April 29, 2026    ![](/email/josh-decapitated.png)    This issue of my newsletter was sent to newsletter subscribers.  [Sign up to receive future issues!](/subscribe/)    Hi there!    I want to talk a bit about AI and the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AI acts as a powerful multiplier for senior engineers, enabling &amp;#34;vibe coding&amp;#34; where experts can rapidly iterate on designs or complex architectures that would otherwise be out of reach &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48235980&quot; title=&quot;I had an Iron Man moment last week where I was “vibe coding” a UI design with component tests live on the other screen. Iterating by asking it to move things, reduce emphasis of an element, exploring layout options, etc.  The loop was near realtime and felt amazing. The code it generated was awful. The kind of garbage that people who don’t know any better would ship: it looked right and it worked. But it was instantly a maintenance dead end.  But I had an effortless time converging on a design…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48237122&quot; title=&quot;The more time I spend accelerating my work with AI tools the more I realize how incredibly hard the craft of shipping useful software actually is. Sure, Claude Code and Codex can write (most of) the code for me - but the amount of technical knowledge I need to decide what and how to build remains enormous. As an example: I&amp;#39;m working on a system right now that works like Claude Artifacts, allowing custom HTML+JS apps to safely run in an iframe sandbox inside a larger application. Just…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. However, there is a sharp divide over the quality of AI-generated output: while experts often view it as unmaintainable &amp;#34;garbage&amp;#34; that requires manual refactoring &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48235980&quot; title=&quot;I had an Iron Man moment last week where I was “vibe coding” a UI design with component tests live on the other screen. Iterating by asking it to move things, reduce emphasis of an element, exploring layout options, etc.  The loop was near realtime and felt amazing. The code it generated was awful. The kind of garbage that people who don’t know any better would ship: it looked right and it worked. But it was instantly a maintenance dead end.  But I had an effortless time converging on a design…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48237343&quot; title=&quot;Could it be that the fact that the thing you’re an expert at looked like garbage to you, but the things you’re not an expert at, looked just fine, is not a coincidence? You can talk to a bunch of designers who will say the opposite. Claude Design Studio generated this garbage UI, that I fixed manually, but it created great code j never could have that made it work.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest we may be entering a &amp;#34;write-only&amp;#34; era where clean code matters less because AI will also handle future maintenance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48236102&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The code it generated was awful. The kind of garbage that people who don’t know any better would ship: it looked right and it worked. But it was instantly a maintenance dead end. In the Tailwind thread the other day I was explicitly told that the intended experience of many frameworks is &amp;#39;write-only code&amp;#39; so maybe this is just the way of the future that we have to learn to embrace. Don&amp;#39;t worry how it&amp;#39;s all hooked up, if it works it works and if it stops working tell the AI to fix it. It&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48236738&quot; title=&quot;Why was it a maintenance dead end? It sounds like you were able to iteratively work on it in its current state, but are you going to be the one maintaining the code? I keep asking myself the same questions, and the conclusion I keep coming to is the clean modeled structure we want to see is for humans to maintain and extend, but the AI doesn&amp;#39;t need this. There&amp;#39;s definitely an efficiency angle here where it&amp;#39;s faster for AI to go from a clean modeled solution to the desired solution because it&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48236056&quot; title=&quot;I feel the same but the question I struggle most with is this: &amp;#39;Does it matter when the people who are going to come along and maintain this are just going to use AI to fix or adjust this maintenance nightmare?&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant disagreement exists regarding junior developers; some argue AI accelerates learning by acting as a tireless research assistant &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48235989&quot; title=&quot;I mostly share Josh&amp;#39;s opinion, but I think a lot of these posts that talk about Senior vs. Junior experience when working with AIs is kind of rubbish. Sure, you get better results as a Senior working with AI tooling and struggle more as a Junior. Nothing has changed in that equation except the amplification. What folks seem to avoid is that a Junior (in ANY subject) has the ability to LEARN so much faster with an AI research assistant, and that becoming an expert has accelerated for those with…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, while skeptics contend that offloading cognitive labor prevents the deep &amp;#34;friction&amp;#34; necessary to actually master a craft &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48236191&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; a Junior (in ANY subject) has the ability to LEARN so much faster with an AI research assistant I’m not seeing this. And based on what we’re seeing at the university level, I’m not expecting to.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48236363&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; a Junior (in ANY subject) has the ability to LEARN so much faster with an AI research assistant This is a testable hypotheses with severe lack of citations. Intuition would argue the opposite. We learn by using our brains, if we offload the thinking to a machine and copy their output we don‘t learn. A child does not learn multiplication by using a calculator, and a language learner will not learn a new language by machine translating every sentence. In both cases all they’ve learnt is using a…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://deno.com/blog/v2.8&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Deno 2.8&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (deno.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48234380&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;415 points · 178 comments · by roflcopter69&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Deno 2.8 introduces major performance upgrades, including 3.66x faster npm installs, and significantly expands Node.js compatibility to a 76.4% test pass rate. Key additions include new subcommands like `deno audit fix` and `deno pack`, support for `import defer`, and Chrome DevTools integration for inspecting network traffic. &lt;a href=&quot;https://deno.com/blog/v2.8&quot; title=&quot;Title: Deno 2.8 | Deno    URL Source: https://deno.com/blog/v2.8    Markdown Content:  Deno 2.8 is here. This is our biggest minor release to date and we’re excited to share it with you.    To upgrade to Deno 2.8, run the following in your terminal:    deno upgrade    If Deno is not yet installed, run one of the following commands to install or [learn how to install it here](https://docs.deno.com/runtime/manual/getting_started/installation).    curl -fsSL https://deno.land/install.sh | sh    iwr…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate over Deno versus Bun centers on their differing philosophies: Deno prioritized security and fixing Node&amp;#39;s architectural flaws, while Bun focused on performance and immediate compatibility with the existing Node/npm ecosystem &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48237586&quot; title=&quot;Deno: has a basic permission model that is very helpful, written in Rust, and native TypeScript support. I&amp;#39;m not deep in the webdev / node / Bun ecosystems, I&amp;#39;ve just been a happy user of Deno for small services for several years. Can someone explain why it sounds like there&amp;#39;s such rapid growth of Bun? Is it just being used as a bundler, but not as JS runtime? Just the permission system alone (though I wish it extended to modules) is so compelling with Deno that I&amp;#39;m perplexed at why someone…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238113&quot; title=&quot;Deno and Bun had very different focuses when they launched. Deno was trying to fix a lot of what Ryan (the original creator of Node) thought was wrong with Node. Bun focused on compatibility with Node and the ability to run popular frameworks like Nextjs from the beginning. A lot of dependencies and frameworks simply did not work with Deno for a long time. In the beginning it didn&amp;#39;t even have the ability to install dependencies from npm. (In hindsight with all the npm supply chain attacks Ryan…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48240024&quot; title=&quot;Deno&amp;#39;s goal was to address Node&amp;#39;s design weaknesses, while Bun came out with the promise of faster performance. Especially if you&amp;#39;re coming from Node or migrating an existing project, it&amp;#39;s easier to justify switching to Bun than to Deno. Since then, all three runtimes have been gradually converging (adopting Web APIs, first class TypeScript support), so there&amp;#39;s little reason to move away from Node&amp;#39;s vast ecosystem to Deno; most npm packages weren&amp;#39;t made with Deno&amp;#39;s security model in mind.…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While Deno has since pivoted toward better Node compatibility, Bun&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;all-in-one&amp;#34; toolchain and speed made it an easier transition for developers overwhelmed by the complex JavaScript tooling landscape &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238318&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Can someone explain why it sounds like there&amp;#39;s such rapid growth of Bun? In my case, when I start a little Typescript side project, instead of drowning in the sea of npm/yarn/berry/pnpm/bubble/vite/webpack/rollup/rolldown/rollout/swc/esbuild/teatime/etc I can just use one thing. And yes, only some of those are Pokémon moves and not actual tools from the JS/TS ecosystem.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238113&quot; title=&quot;Deno and Bun had very different focuses when they launched. Deno was trying to fix a lot of what Ryan (the original creator of Node) thought was wrong with Node. Bun focused on compatibility with Node and the ability to run popular frameworks like Nextjs from the beginning. A lot of dependencies and frameworks simply did not work with Deno for a long time. In the beginning it didn&amp;#39;t even have the ability to install dependencies from npm. (In hindsight with all the npm supply chain attacks Ryan…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users argue Deno remains superior for sandboxed environments and script execution, though others feel its security model is becoming commoditized as Node and Bun evolve &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48236808&quot; title=&quot;I wonder how Deno&amp;#39;s faring. Node&amp;#39;s the stable solution and will be with us forever. You can now use TypeScript with it and, soon enough, you&amp;#39;ll be able to build your app to a single executable -- including native deps. Bun&amp;#39;s chaotic but, nonetheless, it&amp;#39;s _fast_ and it&amp;#39;s taking an interesting approach by including everything in the stdlib. Plus, bought by Anthropic. Deno had an awesome story with the sandbox and ease of import for third-party dependencies. Sandboxes feel pretty commoditized now…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48240024&quot; title=&quot;Deno&amp;#39;s goal was to address Node&amp;#39;s design weaknesses, while Bun came out with the promise of faster performance. Especially if you&amp;#39;re coming from Node or migrating an existing project, it&amp;#39;s easier to justify switching to Bun than to Deno. Since then, all three runtimes have been gradually converging (adopting Web APIs, first class TypeScript support), so there&amp;#39;s little reason to move away from Node&amp;#39;s vast ecosystem to Deno; most npm packages weren&amp;#39;t made with Deno&amp;#39;s security model in mind.…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, Bun&amp;#39;s acquisition by Anthropic is viewed by some as a sign of financial stability, while others remain skeptical of the corporate influence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48236867&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Plus, bought by Anthropic. Who thinks this is a positive?!&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48237015&quot; title=&quot;It means they&amp;#39;re a whole lot less likely to run out of money, which makes them a safer bet as a dependency.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://modelrift.com/blog/openscad-llm-benchmark/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Antigravity 2.0 Tops the OpenSCAD Architectural 3D LLM Benchmark&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (modelrift.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48234090&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;418 points · 160 comments · by jetter&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google’s Antigravity 2.0, powered by Gemini 3.5 Flash, outperformed other AI agents in a benchmark task to autonomously model the Pantheon using OpenSCAD. While it was slower than competitors like Cursor, it was the only model to implement complex architectural details like the interior coffered ceiling. &lt;a href=&quot;https://modelrift.com/blog/openscad-llm-benchmark/&quot; title=&quot;Title: OpenSCAD LLM Benchmark: Building the Pantheon | ModelRift Blog    URL Source: https://modelrift.com/blog/openscad-llm-benchmark/    Published Time: Fri, 22 May 2026 11:10:37 GMT    Markdown Content:  We ran a small practical benchmark: give several AI coding tools the same kind of task and ask them to build the Pantheon in OpenSCAD.    ModelRift generates OpenSCAD for every 3D model on the platform. The LLM’s ability to handle spatial geometry directly affects what we can ship, so we track how…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights how LLMs are lowering the barrier to entry for technical skills like OpenSCAD and Nix, allowing hobbyists to generate functional 3D-printed parts and complex configurations with minimal prior expertise &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48234672&quot; title=&quot;Last weekend I bought my wife a bike off marketplace. It was in good condition but was missing one of the internal cable routing grommets. I gave Claude pictures of the pill-shaped hole by itself and with my digital calipers in the long and short directions. Gave it a short prompt and it gave me an openscad model with everything parametrized. I printed with no changes in tpu and it was nearly perfect on the first try. Claude put in a 0.3mm subtraction in the x/y dimensions and I lowered it to…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48234869&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, CAD has been my personal example of &amp;#39;oh the barrier to entry for this skill was high enough that I didn&amp;#39;t do it and now I can be passably bad at it enough to get some simple things done&amp;#39; I&amp;#39;ve had similar experiences with making simple functional parts off a 3d printer with OpenSCAD + LLMs. I&amp;#39;m very aware that the models are worse at it than say, generating react code, and I&amp;#39;m also the antithesis of a skilled pilot. It&amp;#39;s still cool and has resulted in me starting to learn a new skill at a…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48237288&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s like this with a lot of things now.  For example, Nix&amp;#39;s learning curve used to be a huge barrier to entry.  Now with LLMs, I&amp;#39;m using nix-darwin and home-manager for dotfiles, package management, and have individual flakes in all of my projects for cryptographically reproducible builds!&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users are impressed by the rapid advancement of these models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48234322&quot; title=&quot;The only thing faster moving that AI these days are the goalposts. Three years ago we would have been amazed if models were able to produce anything, now we have the luxury of nitpicking. Even the worst entries in the benchmark are quite impressive.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others criticize the specific &amp;#34;Antigravity&amp;#34; tools for poor user experience and rollout issues &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48234296&quot; title=&quot;Antigravity may well Top the whatever benchmark but: My Antigravity (forced) replacement for Gemini CLI requires me to log on via browser every time I use it, and my Antigravity IDE won&amp;#39;t update at all, so: If it&amp;#39;s ok I&amp;#39;d prefer they just work on reaching a baseline acceptable rollout before worrying about being Top in anything. Ps actual title: OpenSCAD LLM Benchmark: Building the Pantheon&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also an ongoing debate regarding whether the future of the field lies in specialized CAD models or if general-purpose models will continue to dominate all domains &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48234521&quot; title=&quot;Why are specialized CAD making LLM models not showing up?  In future are we going to have same model for everything? from programming to creative writing to CADs?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://andrewlock.net/exploring-the-dotnet-11-preview-2-dotnet-gets-union-types/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;.NET (OK, C#) finally gets union types&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (andrewlock.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48234954&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;231 points · &lt;strong&gt;266 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by ingve&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;C# 15, introduced in the .NET 11 preview, adds native support for union types using the `union` keyword, allowing variables to represent multiple unrelated types with compiler-enforced exhaustive switch expressions and options for custom, non-boxing implementations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://andrewlock.net/exploring-the-dotnet-11-preview-2-dotnet-gets-union-types/&quot; title=&quot;Title: .NET (OK, C#) finally gets union types🎉: Exploring the .NET 11 preview - Part 2    URL Source: https://andrewlock.net/exploring-the-dotnet-11-preview-2-dotnet-gets-union-types/    Published Time: 2026-05-19T10:00:00.0000000    Markdown Content:  May 19, 2026 ~10 min read    [Exploring the .NET 11 preview - Part 2](https://andrewlock.net/series/exploring-the-dotnet-11-preview/)    This is the second post in the series: [Exploring the .NET 11…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The addition of union types to C# is seen as a fundamental improvement to the type system &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48251769&quot; title=&quot;Discriminated union types are a really fundamental building block of a type system. It&amp;#39;s a sad state of matters that many mainstream languages don&amp;#39;t have them.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, though some users worry the added complexity could lead to more confusing codebases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48251568&quot; title=&quot;I mean yes, but also: uh-oh.    I&amp;#39;m looking forward to reading some code that is even more confusing than the code I&amp;#39;m already reading. Not entirely convinced that I see the usecase that makes up for the potential madness.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While proponents argue that C# successfully balances high performance with ease of use &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48251835&quot; title=&quot;I love C# and in every iteration we&amp;#39;re getting more and more features to get C-like performance in a lot of scenarios. C# does it really well because if your problem isn&amp;#39;t performance/memory-constrained, you can ignore these features and fallback on the language&amp;#39;s natural ease of use.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others note that it still lags behind F# in feature adoption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48251565&quot; title=&quot;F# leads the way and C# slowly catches up, as always. Yet for some reason, C# still gets all the mindshare.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt; and lacks a robust framework ecosystem for cross-platform UI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48252155&quot; title=&quot;C# is my strongest and favorite language. That said, it&amp;#39;s frustrating that the C# framework ecosystem lacks solid options. MAUI is especially half-baked, and I&amp;#39;m really starting to doubt whether I should continue using XAML&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also specific technical debate regarding the implementation&amp;#39;s limitations, such as the inability to define a generic `Either&amp;amp;lt;T, U&amp;amp;gt;` type &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48251592&quot; title=&quot;AFAICT, this means you won’t be able to define Either , which is definitely a thing you sometimes want to do.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, and how the feature reinforces idiomatic &amp;#34;parse, don&amp;#39;t validate&amp;#34; patterns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48251662&quot; title=&quot;C# is strongly-typed, not stringly-typed. The point of the union is to list possible outcomes as defined through their respective types. The idiomatic way to do this would be to parse, don&amp;#39;t validate [1] each string into a relevant type with a record or record struct. If you just wanted to return two results of the same type, you&amp;#39;d wrap them in a named tuple or a record that represented the actual meaning. [1] https://lexi-lambda.github.io/blog/2019/11/05/parse-don-t-va...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://qz.com/samsung-chip-workers-bonus-ai-profits-052126&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Samsung chip workers will get an average $340k bonus as AI profits soar&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (qz.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48230892&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;251 points · 196 comments · by carabiner&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://qz.com/samsung-chip-workers-bonus-ai-profits-052126&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The massive bonuses for Samsung workers are seen as life-changing relative to Korean living standards, sparking a debate on why similar wealth distribution is less common in the US &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48231797&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s literally insane for Korean living standards. Those people can basically retire&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48231368&quot; title=&quot;Meanwhile tech workers in the US spend all day online defending billionaires who wouldn&amp;#39;t piss on them to put out a fire and arguing about why we can&amp;#39;t have unions because blah blah blah rugged individualism.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some credit the success of unions for these payouts, others argue that US tech workers are already compensated with &amp;#34;moon money&amp;#34; and equity, which aligns their interests with billionaires and discourages labor organization &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48231521&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Meanwhile tech workers in the US spend all day online defending billionaires Tech pulled a great trick here: equity. America as a whole pulled a similar trick: 401k It’s hard to fight the billionaires when all your money depends on not fighting them.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48231601&quot; title=&quot;I find this complaint hard to square when US developers earn &amp;#39;moon money&amp;#39; compared to both: a) fields requiring similar levels of expertise like EE or Mech-E and b) international developers in similar roles. Plus, equity. [GIF of Woody Harrelson wiping tears with money]&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48231704&quot; title=&quot;unions work&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Disagreements persist over whether billionaires create societal value or exploit it, with some users claiming public ownership is already achieved through 401ks while others call for deeper decommodification &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48231885&quot; title=&quot;Imagine the world, where instead of making billionaires and trillionaires, we would actually share with society. Providing affordable products/services to common people. Decommodification of life. There&amp;#39;s no money for public investments, but there is always money for wars. There&amp;#39;s no money for raises and bonuses for workers, until workers show there&amp;#39;s no company without them. So, if there&amp;#39;s no money for public investments, it&amp;#39;s time to show there&amp;#39;s no public for their wars and exploitation.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48231962&quot; title=&quot;People are billionaires because they “share with society”. They take a small fraction of the wealth and surplus they create. If you create $6 of value for every American and capture half of it you are a billionaire. “Public investments” besides are heavily spent on. The majority of the US federal budget goes to welfare. If you want new infrastructure and so on, the primary blockers are the universal veto powers we hand normal people.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48231697&quot; title=&quot;Well yeah America has achieved what the communists sought: public ownership of the means of production . Today most of the American public owns the largest means of production in government advantaged accounts. Marx ought to be proud&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48232057&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; People are billionaires because they “share with society”. They take a small fraction of the wealth and surplus they create. I truly cannot believe that anyone with an ounce of empathy or integrity could possibly believe a statement as absurd as this.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.kanbots.dev/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Open source Kanban desktop app that runs parallel agents on every card&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (kanbots.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239413&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;258 points · 159 comments · by vitriapp&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KanBots is an open-source, local-first desktop Kanban app that automates software development by running multiple AI agents in parallel across separate git worktrees to handle tasks, split subtasks, and manage GitHub PRs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.kanbots.dev/&quot; title=&quot;Title: KanBots — a kanban that runs parallel agents    URL Source: https://www.kanbots.dev/    Markdown Content:  [kanbots](https://www.kanbots.dev/)  [leodavinci1/kanbots](https://github.com/leodavinci1/kanbots)[Download](https://github.com/leodavinci1/kanbots/releases/latest)    [v1.0 · MIT licensed·Open source on GitHub](https://github.com/leodavinci1/kanbots)    ## A kanban that runs parallel agents on every card.    Drop a folder. Get a board. Dispatch Claude Code or Codex agents on as many cards as…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a growing shift toward &amp;#34;unreviewed&amp;#34; code, with users admitting they often run large AI-generated programs for one-off tasks without inspecting the logic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48241077&quot; title=&quot;Most of the narrative is about how AI is writing all/most code, but I’d wager that the fraction of human reviewed code is approaching zero far faster than anyone is realizing or willing to admit.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48241386&quot; title=&quot;Very true.   Last year I at least glanced at every line of AI generated code.    Now if some AI makes a 10k line program for some one-off tasks, I run the program, glance only over the output, and move on.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48241679&quot; title=&quot;Calculate the engine  power of a 2015 VW polo when travelling 70 mph on a flat road behind a box truck.  Draw a chart of drag Vs follow distance.   How significant is humidity on the result?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that human review is becoming secondary to model comprehension &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243722&quot; title=&quot;You care about code quality. Many don’t. I had someone tell me this week that a 6000 line class was ok because it was easier for the model to understand and that’s more important than human comprehension. And I get his point but that seems like a big risk to take.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others remain skeptical of &amp;#34;black box&amp;#34; agent activity, preferring real-time oversight to ensure quality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48240700&quot; title=&quot;I keep wondering how people accept a nights worth of agent activity. I feel 30 minutes of planning and 30 minutes of implementation in my solo side project&amp;#39;s repo is too big to review. At minute 5, I may ask the AI to redo stuff even as its spitting out code.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48240744&quot; title=&quot;I wonder the same. The answer I usually get from people who do manage is that they don&amp;#39;t look at the code – or at least not in detail. Personally, I always end up tweaking something the agent produced. I wonder if I should let go of that control...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. There is strong consensus that local-first, zero-telemetry architecture is a prerequisite for adopting such autonomous tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239931&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; &amp;#39;Local-first, zero servers. Everything lives in .kanbots/ next to your repo: SQLite database, configs, worktrees. No cloud account, no telemetry, no HTTP server. This is the open-source desktop edition.&amp;#39; This is table-stakes for me to consider adoption of a tool like this.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://libertas.software/en/knowledge-hub/19/the-companies-cutting-headcount-for-ai-will-lose-to-the-ones-who-didnt&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Companies Cutting Headcount for AI Will Lose to the Ones Who Didn&amp;#39;t&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (libertas.software)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48234547&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;199 points · 189 comments · by soft-research&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Companies that use AI to replace staff risk losing vital institutional knowledge and judgment, while those who use the technology to augment and multiply their existing employees&amp;#39; capabilities will gain a long-term competitive advantage. &lt;a href=&quot;https://libertas.software/en/knowledge-hub/19/the-companies-cutting-headcount-for-ai-will-lose-to-the-ones-who-didnt&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Companies Cutting Headcount for AI Will Lose to the Ones Who Didn&amp;#39;t    URL Source: https://libertas.software/en/knowledge-hub/19/the-companies-cutting-headcount-for-ai-will-lose-to-the-ones-who-didnt    Markdown Content:  There is a version of AI adoption that looks smart on a spreadsheet. Fewer people, lower payroll, same output. It is the version being quietly executed in boardrooms right now, dressed up in language about efficiency and transformation.    It is also the version that will…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on whether AI-driven layoffs are a strategic mistake or a necessary correction to a decade of &amp;#34;suspiciously inflated&amp;#34; employee counts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48235641&quot; title=&quot;I think the unfortunate reality is that lots of companies in our industry have suspiciously inflated employee counts in the first place. Even when removing AI and the pandemic over-hiring, I wouldn&amp;#39;t have been surprised to see corrections sooner or later. Employee count seems to correlate to stock market incentives - which is how GitLab is like 5x larger than Valve.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48235827&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I think the unfortunate reality is that lots of companies in our industry have suspiciously inflated employee counts in the first place. Even when removing AI and the pandemic over-hiring, I wouldn&amp;#39;t have been surprised to see corrections sooner or later. It&amp;#39;s funny to me that everyone talks about pandemic over-hiring, as if this hadn&amp;#39;t been a thing for a decade before that. Like, when I started at FB in 2013, they probably had about 75% of the engineers they needed (and about 10% of the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that augmenting workers with AI is functionally equivalent to replacing them &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48235269&quot; title=&quot;On the scale of a company, augmenting is replacing.  If a worker plus AI can do the work of two workers without AI (but cheaper), you go for that; and it doesn&amp;#39;t matter how good or bad AI is without the human.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt; and that enterprise teams can now be reduced to one-third of their former size &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48235443&quot; title=&quot;The major issue, is that once people are more productive with AI, you are able to replace people because less of them are required. You see this in enterprise consulting, wiht the increase in cloud, serverless, SaaS/iPaaS, low code/no code, content generation and translations, followed by AI agent orchestration, the teams can be reduced down to about 1/3 of what they used to be. It isn&amp;#39;t as if there are enough projects around to keep the other 2/3 busy, so eventually when there are enough of…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that cutting proven talent is &amp;#34;looney-tunes&amp;#34; because there is no limit to the work that can be done if a business is effective &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48235213&quot; title=&quot;Cutting people because of AI makes no sense, you know these people are good without AI, you&amp;#39;d want to keep them! Freeze the constant over-hiring instead, and take care of the people you know aren&amp;#39;t lobotomized yet, and train them if needed. I&amp;#39;m seeing so much shedding of knowledge workers though, even though AI clearly isn&amp;#39;t ready to replace people, just ready to augment them currently, that it looks like looney-tunes currently.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48235572&quot; title=&quot;This sounds like an attempt to rationalize the fact that your business isn&amp;#39;t that effective, otherwise adding more people would result in making more money. &amp;gt; It isn&amp;#39;t as if there are enough projects around to keep the other 2/3 busy I&amp;#39;ve never worked at any company where there was any limit to the work to be done. Sales people don&amp;#39;t give a shit what your product can do, only what they can sell, and they never sleep.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. A notable debate also emerged regarding the &amp;#34;pampered&amp;#34; nature of tech culture, with some predicting a shift toward more modest, traditional engineering benefits as the industry matures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48236075&quot; title=&quot;AI aside, if we just look at other engineering disciplines in mature sectors, the future is not bright(er). No fully paid golden cadillac benefits packages (for your dog too!), no twice daily uber eats comps, no $150k entry level, no unlimited PTO, no 6 months leave. If you go to your uncles engineering department at the boiler company, these guy&amp;#39;s engineering roles are about as pampered as the warehouse managers. The upside is that it will cull those in it just for the money/lifestyle, and…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48236188&quot; title=&quot;Two things: 1) Unlimited PTO is a scam. Ask anyone who ever got paid out six weeks salary when they changed jobs. 2) “the craft” is doing some heavy lifting here. I happen to enjoy AI-assisted dev, but it is nothing like the work that drew me to the industry. Otherwise agreed on all counts.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48236270&quot; title=&quot;Unlimited PTO works great for someone like me who regularly takes half day and full day PTO every quarter for various commitments/life stuff. But I’m also a guy and I have no problem asserting myself/spending my benefits. People who are a little less comfortable with that end up just parking on it and would do a lot better if they were given a set number of PTO days. The ambiguity hurts them in the same way not having set raise schedules and discussions hurts them. Edit: folks, I can assure you…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://temertymedicine.utoronto.ca/news/how-decades-sleep-research-led-new-sleep-apnea-drug&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sleep research led to a new sleep apnea drug&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (temertymedicine.utoronto.ca)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48242278&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;230 points · 153 comments · by colinprince&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://temertymedicine.utoronto.ca/news/how-decades-sleep-research-led-new-sleep-apnea-drug&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While CPAP therapy is considered highly effective for reversing the long-term health consequences of sleep apnea, many users find the machines difficult to tolerate or see little improvement in their fatigue &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48242844&quot; title=&quot;People should be more aware of the symptoms of sleep apneas - the lack of energy during the day, feeling tired, waking up throughout the night, waking up tired/exhausted, etc. People with untreated sleep apnea have multiple folds higher chances to be depressed, unemployed, and have trouble with basic life functions, in addition to the long term health consequences of depriving your brain from Oxygen. I&amp;#39;ve suggested 4 people over the last couple of years to get tested based on them casually…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243443&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve tried a CPAP machine for 6 weeks and felt no different and gave up. I think I was a 6 on the scale. I wish it had worked though! Currently I&amp;#39;ve just given up and embracing feeling relatively tired all the time. I&amp;#39;ve tried side sleeping devices (woody knows backpack) mandibular advancement splints etc. So hard to tell (I find anyway) to get to a definitive answer&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243981&quot; title=&quot;Having been down this path, it’s evident to me that the US has built up a sizable medical equipment industry around CPAP machines and their supplies.  The sleep doctors who prescribe them don’t have many alternatives, so it’s the normal treatment they hand out. So it’s not a surprise that a casual mention of sleep quality ended with a CPAP machine rented by the month. It’s kind of what happened to me.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion is divided over alternative treatments: some advocate for weight loss via GLP-1 drugs or structural fixes like posture and breathing exercises, while others dismiss these as &amp;#34;pseudoscience&amp;#34; that cannot fix severe physiological collapses &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48242844&quot; title=&quot;People should be more aware of the symptoms of sleep apneas - the lack of energy during the day, feeling tired, waking up throughout the night, waking up tired/exhausted, etc. People with untreated sleep apnea have multiple folds higher chances to be depressed, unemployed, and have trouble with basic life functions, in addition to the long term health consequences of depriving your brain from Oxygen. I&amp;#39;ve suggested 4 people over the last couple of years to get tested based on them casually…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243574&quot; title=&quot;I went through the whole process of seeing an ENT, using the machine for the at-home sleep study so insurance would give me a CPAP, then not being able to sleep with a CPAP, and over the course of a couple years I fixed my sleep apnea by fixing my posture and breathing. If you have forward head posture or are not used to breathing through your nose, you might also benefit from this. I think it’s kind of crazy that we do surgeries and take medicine that modifies your brain chemistry for what I…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48244020&quot; title=&quot;What a ridiculous post. Please leave the Reddit pseudoscience at the door. There are researchers actively working and studying people with sleep apnea. They&amp;#39;re not suffering from &amp;#39;forward head posture&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;breathing wrong&amp;#39;. I have severe sleep apnea and no amount of &amp;#39;breathing exercises&amp;#39; are going to cause my soft palate to uncollapse itself while I&amp;#39;m trying to get REM sleep.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243999&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; what I believe in many cases is a structural issue Many cases it is not. I&amp;#39;m not trying to be a contrarian but I don&amp;#39;t want to plant hope in some people who suffer from sleep apnea thinking it&amp;#39;s something they can just do breathing exercises for. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/central-sleep...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also skepticism regarding the new drug AD109, as its average reduction of four events per hour may be insufficient for those with moderate to severe cases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243011&quot; title=&quot;It only reduces by 4 events per hour. That seems like it might be helpful for someone with mild sleep apnea. But not with moderate or severe sleep apnea. Adult AHI Severity Levels Normal: Less than (5) events per hour. Mild Sleep Apnea: (5) to (14.9) events per hour (frequent minor interruptions). Moderate Sleep Apnea: (15) to (29.9) events per hour.Severe Sleep Apnea: (30) or more events per hour. &amp;#39;By mapping the neural circuits that lead to this common condition, work from the Horner lab laid…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-21</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-21</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.flipper.net/flipper-one-we-need-your-help/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Flipper One – we need your help&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.flipper.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48220647&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1259 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 482 comments · by sandebert&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Flipper Devices has announced Flipper One, an ambitious open-source Linux &amp;#34;cyberdeck&amp;#34; and network multi-tool featuring a modular hardware design and a dual-processor architecture. The team is seeking community assistance via a new Developer Portal to help refine its custom OS, UI framework, and mainline Linux kernel support. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.flipper.net/flipper-one-we-need-your-help/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Flipper One — we need your help    URL Source: https://blog.flipper.net/flipper-one-we-need-your-help/    Published Time: 2026-05-21T10:46:27.000Z    Markdown Content:  *   [![Image 1: Pavel Zhovner](https://blog.flipper.net/content/images/size/w100/2020/10/9a8180b4-80fa-4c50-9e83-bee59e3bc348-1.png)](https://blog.flipper.net/author/zhovner/)    ![Image 2: Flipper One — we need your help](https://blog.flipper.net/content/images/size/w2000/2026/05/Flipper-One-we-need-your-help-main-v2.jpg)  We&amp;#39;re…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Flipper One announcement sparked a debate over its writing style, with some users dismissing the text as &amp;#34;AI slop&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48221222&quot; title=&quot;Most articles I click on in the HN homepage turn out to be written by AI, judging from the phrasing. I&amp;#39;m weirded out by the fact that people don&amp;#39;t seem to find it important to write their own thoughts down. The writing in TFA is clearly supervised by a human, but still, the wording is not human at all.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48221424&quot; title=&quot;It is exhausting to always have to read word salads with little content. Every single fucking article with 20 lines of introduction before you get a chance for actual content. LLM slop then dilutes the information, and LLM slop always read the same way. You know, how easy it is to spot LLM generated content, it is actually refreshing when you can tell it&amp;#39;s a human.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, while others argued that such cynicism is becoming a tiresome distraction from actual content &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48221253&quot; title=&quot;Tbh, I&amp;#39;m getting more frustrated with the ever-coming flood of &amp;#39;Bah I didn&amp;#39;t read because it was obvious AI blah blah&amp;#39; which seemingly every single submission HAS to come with nowadays on HN, god forbid someone is more interested in the content than the flow of the words. If you have specific complaints about the text and content, bring those up instead, and we could discuss those or even correct the linked page itself, as it seems to be a wiki. But general complaints that could be copy-pasted…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. The author clarified that the text was a human-written draft in Russian and English polished by editors, not generated by AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48221934&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m the author of this text. It was originaly writen in a mix of russian and english WITHOUT the AI and then polished and translated by editors. Here is the original draft https://blog.flipper.net/p/b5b7e9f8-a99f-4393-bf72-23fe5a42e...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48221251&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The writing in TFA is clearly supervised by a human, but still, the wording is not human at all. I don&amp;#39;t see the AI &amp;#39;tells&amp;#39; in this article. What are you noticing? They use a lot of em-dashes but they use them in a very human way.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond the prose, commenters expressed confusion over the specific &amp;#34;help&amp;#34; requested &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225192&quot; title=&quot;I have a Flipper Zero and these guys made a great tool, so I clicked this headline because it said &amp;#39;we need your help&amp;#39;. After scrolling two pages I couldn&amp;#39;t find what they need my help with, though. I scrolled to the end and couldn&amp;#39;t find it there either. If I&amp;#39;m being honest, I like their stuff but not enough to dig through 8 pages of content to find out what helping means.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, eventually identifying the project as a call for FOSS contributors to assist with hardware reverse-engineering and open-source driver development &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225311&quot; title=&quot;This effort seems less of a &amp;#39;Help us by buying our product&amp;#39; and more a plea for contributors as a FOSS effort, they want to do things like this: &amp;#39;Collabora + Flipper: Opening up the RK3576&amp;#39; https://www.collabora.com/news-and-blog/news-and-events/coll... , and are basically looking for developers and other technology enthusiasts to help them both with the projects themselves, and also try to network (socially) their way into convincing brands and companies to also open up themselves more: &amp;gt;…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48221133&quot; title=&quot;Can someone explain why Flipper is making these decisions, or what advantages Flipper One has vs a Flipper Zero, RPI, and Linux machine? The (EDIT2: maybe not) AI writing doesn’t help. EDIT: looking more, it seems like the goal is to be a fun project like Playdate, except a Linux multi-tool instead of game console. Which is actually great, a step towards healing today’s corporatized tech culture. It’s unfortunate that the website non-explains this with AI and marketing speak. EDIT2: I wrote too…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some praised the ambitious scope and &amp;#34;all in-tree&amp;#34; source goal &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48221048&quot; title=&quot;This looks flippin&amp;#39; amazing, but also like the definition of project scope creep. I imagine it will be brilliant, unaffordable, surprisingly cheap, terrible and awesome (in both senses of the word) all at the same time. 3GPP really needs a light shining through it. I sincerely hope I work out a way of getting someone else to buy the thing for me. And the push towards all in-tree source is fantastic. Genuinely impressed.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others questioned the form factor, suggesting a full QWERTY keyboard and x86 architecture would be more practical for mobile development &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48220949&quot; title=&quot;Cool, but I think they&amp;#39;re holding themselves back with that weird form-factor. I would&amp;#39;ve preferred if they&amp;#39;d included a full QWERTY keyboard, like the the GPD Pocket 4[1] or the GPD Win Mini. With a proper keyboard, I could write code on the go, easily edit files, navigate a terminal and mess with things... and do so much more in general. Also, 8GB RAM is barely enough these days, whereas the GPD comes with upto 64GB RAM - and an X86 CPU too, which means you can run your favorite Linux distro…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://axelk.ee/ai-is-just-unauthorised-plagiarism-at-a-bigger-scale/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI is just unauthorised plagiarism at a bigger scale&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (axelk.ee)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48222383&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;818 points · 731 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that AI companies and users engage in large-scale unauthorized plagiarism by training models on uncompensated content and profiting from generated results, citing a personal experience where a competitor used ChatGPT to copy their tutorials and outrank them in search results. &lt;a href=&quot;https://axelk.ee/ai-is-just-unauthorised-plagiarism-at-a-bigger-scale/&quot; title=&quot;Title: AI is just unauthorised plagiarism at a bigger scale    URL Source: https://axelk.ee/ai-is-just-unauthorised-plagiarism-at-a-bigger-scale/    Markdown Content:  ## [Axel&amp;#39;s blog](https://axelk.ee/)  [Home](https://axelk.ee/)[Blog](https://axelk.ee/blog/)[Now](https://axelk.ee/now/)    _20 May, 2026_    AI takes in all the input, whether the original authors have consented or not, and do some &amp;#39;learning&amp;#39;, and then the AI companies sell these learned result to humans, without compensating the original…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate centers on whether the massive scale of AI training constitutes a qualitative shift that distinguishes it from individual learning or fair use &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225321&quot; title=&quot;There’s a fallacy that gets used a whole lot to justify things like this (not just with LLMs), and I see it in many of the comments here:  If it’s OK (or at least negligible on a small scale), then it must be OK  on a large scale. It usually goes something like: If I can make money by learning something from a web page, why does a computer making money by learning everything from everyone upset people so? It’s the same thing! It’s like if I go to Golden Gate Park and pick one flower, I shouldn’t…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48223600&quot; title=&quot;This is really not so clear cut as &amp;#39;fair use&amp;#39; might cover 99% of all data scrapping; you are not reproducing the originals just use them to estimate probabilistic distribution of tokens in pre-training. You are never going to get the exact book word-for-word using LLMs.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that intellectual property is an outdated concept and that AI could finally dismantle restrictive copyright laws &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48223614&quot; title=&quot;if theres just one good thing coming out of ai its breaking copyright law forever. no one should be able to &amp;#39;own&amp;#39; ideas. royalties for commercial use is another thing and i support it but what we know as (non commercial) piracy and unlicensed fan art should be 100% legal&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48222928&quot; title=&quot;People need to cope with the fact that no thought is original. Even Newton and Leibniz were having the same thoughts at the same time. Get over it.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that removing ownership disincentivizes creation and unfairly exploits content providers who fund the very data AI consumes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48222863&quot; title=&quot;The broader problem of original sources not being given credit in a way that rewards them remains. Websites owners are paying to host their content so that spiders can come and crawl them and index it into the AI and then if they’re lucky, they might get a citation, but otherwise there’s very little reward for being a provider of content. And of course, this is something that’s getting worse and worse. Why look at a website when it’s all in AI? And then the counter to that is maybe we need to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48223951&quot; title=&quot;This is an incredibly naive view of intellectual property. If you cannot own things you create, there is little incentive to create and share those things. Do you think any of your favorite movies and TV shows ever get made without copyright protections? Of course not, because money needs to change hands for those things to be funded.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. This tension is further complicated by accusations of hypocrisy regarding past support for ad-blocking and piracy, alongside concerns that websites may soon be forced behind logins to survive &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48222863&quot; title=&quot;The broader problem of original sources not being given credit in a way that rewards them remains. Websites owners are paying to host their content so that spiders can come and crawl them and index it into the AI and then if they’re lucky, they might get a citation, but otherwise there’s very little reward for being a provider of content. And of course, this is something that’s getting worse and worse. Why look at a website when it’s all in AI? And then the counter to that is maybe we need to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48223490&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s never been a problem with people ad-blocking for the last 20 years, why is it suddenly a problem now? We&amp;#39;ve been celebrating denying creators revenue for decades... Maybe this is just the internet hypocricy of &amp;#39;When I do it, it&amp;#39;s good, when they do it, it&amp;#39;s bad&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://valhovey.github.io/gaia-mary/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Project Hail Mary – Stellar Navigation Chart&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (valhovey.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225297&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1181 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 241 comments · by speleo&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This interactive stellar navigation chart, based on Gaia DR3 data, maps the journey of the *Hail Mary* spacecraft toward Tau Ceti, featuring key nearby stars within a range of 57.8 light-years. &lt;a href=&quot;https://valhovey.github.io/gaia-mary/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Hail Mary - Star Map    URL Source: https://valhovey.github.io/gaia-mary/    Published Time: Thu, 21 May 2026 15:10:27 GMT    Warning: This is a cached snapshot of the original page, consider retry with caching opt-out.    Markdown Content:  SOL    EARTH    ALPHA CENTAURI    SIRIUS    PROCYON    EPSILON ERIDANI    40 ERIDANI    ALTAIR    POLLUX    BARNARD&amp;#39;S STAR    WOLF 359    LALANDE 21185    ROSS 154    KAPTEYN&amp;#39;S STAR    ROSS 128    WISE 0855-0714    HAIL MARY    Stellar Navigation Chart    GAIA DR3 · ECL J2000 ·…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights the extreme difficulty of visualizing the vast scale of space, noting that if Earth were one inch from the Sun, Alpha Centauri would be four miles away &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48226290&quot; title=&quot;Just FYI the sizes of the planets, stars, and their orbits are not to scale at all. To get an idea of how empty space is, there are 63,360 inches in a mile, and 63,239 astronomical units in a light-year. So if you scaled everything down such that Earth was 1 inch from the Sun, Neptune would be 30 inches away and Alpha Centauri would be 4 miles away. If you were using a 4k display and had the Sun and Alpha Centauri visible at opposite sides of the display, the orbit of Neptune would be in the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48228245&quot; title=&quot;FYI we have a up to scale model of the solar system in Sweden https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweden_Solar_System Come visit!&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While *The Expanse* is praised for its relative realism regarding long-range combat and braking burns, users agree that most sci-fi still relies on &amp;#34;artistic license&amp;#34; for drama, such as manual piloting and impossibly close-range battles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48227056&quot; title=&quot;Even sci-fi writers that try to get this right have a hard time wrapping their heads around it. &amp;#39;It&amp;#39;s called space for a reason.&amp;#39; When I saw the series adaptation of The Expanse, it was really obvious they played a lot of artistic license to make it exciting. A real space battle would be dots firing invisible dots at each other. &amp;#39;Close quarter battle&amp;#39; would be within something like 2000 kilometers, maybe more. That is close.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48227267&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; When I saw the series adaptation of The Expanse, it was really obvious they played a lot of artistic license to make it exciting. A real space battle would be dots firing invisible dots at each other. &amp;#39;Close quarter battle&amp;#39; would be within something like 2000 kilometers, maybe more. That is close. This is noteworthy because The Expanse tried to get this better than other scifi, say Star Trek, Battlestar Galactica, or Star Wars (ok, space opera), where engagements take place at absurdly short…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48227806&quot; title=&quot;The Expanse also was (for me) the first to introduce the concept of a braking burn. Star Wars ships just stop without turning around - can’t unsee it. I think the way X-wing fighters “fly” also wouldn’t work at all, I don’t see any reaction mass coming out the sides.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48228868&quot; title=&quot;Biggest thing they all still get wrong for reasons of drama is showing humans wrestling with controls and flying like a fighter pilot. Real spaceships do not and will not have humans in the control loop except to specify a destination or target.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some readers celebrate the source book&amp;#39;s success, others criticize the protagonist&amp;#39;s characterization and the plot&amp;#39;s plausibility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48226352&quot; title=&quot;It can be summed up as &amp;#39;Ken Meets Jesus&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;Ken Goes to Space&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;Ken is a bumbling moron&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;Ken&amp;#39;s first friend&amp;#39;. &amp;#39;Ken&amp;#39;s White Savior moment&amp;#39; This appears to be the norm for US based scifi now. Glad I&amp;#39;m watching movies like The Wandering Earth and Alienoid instead. It had a good premise. But it also fell apart immediately. Like, they only sent 3 people, 2 whom died on this UBER CRITICAL SAVE THE PLANET idea? And Ryan Gosling&amp;#39;s character is a fucking moron. You&amp;#39;re supposed to be a molecular…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225996&quot; title=&quot;I am so happy this movie did great, the book was great Similar to me books: Bobiverse, Long Way To A Small Angry Planet I&amp;#39;m not a heavy reader This site is cool, I want to get to know stellar navigation stuff for astrophotography watching a video like this where they pull up star charts to point the telescope at it pretty cool https://www.youtube.com/live/TexqPMQMyZg?si=oEnvrxW21-D0VXGV... Tangent I&amp;#39;ll throw in here, I never get the fabric folding gravity well diagrams as it seems to have a…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48226471&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; White Savior moment ???&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.google/products/ads-commerce/google-marketing-live-search-ads/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;We&amp;#39;re testing new ad formats in Search and expanding our Direct Offers pilot&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.google)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48220105&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;628 points · 571 comments · by sofumel&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google is testing new Gemini-powered ad formats in Search, including conversational discovery ads and AI-powered shopping explainers, while expanding its Direct Offers pilot to include native checkout and travel deals. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.google/products/ads-commerce/google-marketing-live-search-ads/&quot; title=&quot;Title: A new generation of ads for the AI era of Search    URL Source: https://blog.google/products/ads-commerce/google-marketing-live-search-ads/    Published Time: 2026-05-20T16:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  May 20, 2026    6 min read    Built with Gemini, we&amp;#39;re testing new ad formats in Search and expanding our Direct Offers pilot to help brands connect with consumers.    ## General summary    Google is integrating Gemini into Search to provide conversational, AI-driven ad experiences that offer…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion reflects deep skepticism toward Google&amp;#39;s claim that AI-integrated ads are &amp;#34;helpful,&amp;#34; with many users arguing that ads are inherently biased, misleading, or an existential threat to objective information &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48220561&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; We’re introducing more helpful ads in AI Mode I always chuckle when ad companies say that. I have never seen a helpful ad in google search, but well I have been using adblockers forever so I would not know.I am honestly curious though, for those who don&amp;#39;t use adblockers - what percentage of ads that you see are actually helpful?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48220714&quot; title=&quot;Since when have we considered ads something helpful? Their purpose isn’t to be helpful. They&amp;#39;re there to sell you something, and nothing more. Any semblance of helpfulness is misinterpretation and merely coincidental.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48221923&quot; title=&quot;An ad is never helpful because ads are designed to mislead me into buying something I didn&amp;#39;t need or knew about before I saw the ad. If nothing else, an ad cannot impartially compare a product with the competition (and sometimes the &amp;#39;competition&amp;#39; is buying nothing at all), therefore every ad lies. If I already needed or knew about it, I didn&amp;#39;t need the ad. If I was happy with my life without the product advertised, I didn&amp;#39;t need the ad. Furthermore, ads are fueling our capitalist, consumerist…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A major concern is that AI responses will be covertly influenced by advertisers, making the technology &amp;#34;useless or worse&amp;#34; if users cannot trust the impartiality of the results &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48220520&quot; title=&quot;Does nobody talk abot the elephant in the room?  Will the answers the AI gives also be influenced by Googles customers?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48220546&quot; title=&quot;I won&amp;#39;t be able to use their AI results if they are, personally. If I ask the question &amp;#39;what is the best tool for doing x&amp;#39; and I can&amp;#39;t trust that the answer is going to be the truth according to all available information, then the AI is useless or worse, misleading. If google is unbiased, and only highlights paid advertiser mentions, no one will pay. I&amp;#39;d only accept this if it was a clear separation of LLM response and ads in a sidebar or something similar. Other people may not care. Many…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Some participants note that this move may be a strategic attempt to bypass ad blockers by embedding commercial content directly into generated text &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48220779&quot; title=&quot;The only reason Google is pushing this AI crap is so that they can shove ads right into people&amp;#39;s throats without them being able to use ad blockers (it&amp;#39;s easy to block a web script but virtually impossible to block the text itself), effectively doubling their profits overnight.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, while others point out that even without direct ads, AI results are already manipulated by SEO and affiliate marketing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48220610&quot; title=&quot;Let me let you in on a little industry &amp;#39;secret&amp;#39; You can&amp;#39;t trust those results no matter what The pages that they pull in to source that data all contain affiliate links and companies contact websites to get their tools to the tops of those lists by paying money often monthly. I know this because I do this... It&amp;#39;s basically standard SEO but it also manipulates AI like ChatGPT very very easily&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While a minority view suggests ads can occasionally connect willing buyers with niche products, the consensus remains that internet ads are largely inefficient and intrusive &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48221050&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Since when have we considered ads something helpful? Depends. Ads a low-effort large-reach pathways for lead generation, mostly useful for B2C penetration. I also did sales when I ran my own company, and I can absolutely guarantee that ads can be helpful. When talking to leads you&amp;#39;re talking to someone who a) never saw what you offered but is listening to you anyway, or b)  saw what you offered and decided to contact you. The very first thing I&amp;#39;d do in sales is try to determine if the person…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://davidoks.blog/p/ai-is-killing-the-cheap-smartphone&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The memory shortage is causing a repricing of consumer electronics&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (davidoks.blog)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48229319&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;537 points · &lt;strong&gt;627 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by d0ks&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Surging demand for AI-specific memory is causing a global shortage of commodity DRAM, driving up costs for consumer electronics and effectively pricing millions of low-income users out of the smartphone market. &lt;a href=&quot;https://davidoks.blog/p/ai-is-killing-the-cheap-smartphone&quot; title=&quot;Title: AI is killing the cheap smartphone    URL Source: https://davidoks.blog/p/ai-is-killing-the-cheap-smartphone    Published Time: 2026-05-21T20:22:34+00:00    Markdown Content:  [![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current memory shortage highlights the extreme capital requirements of DRAM fabrication, with new facilities costing upwards of $20 billion and requiring years of &amp;#34;substandard&amp;#34; yields before becoming competitive &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48230679&quot; title=&quot;What was most surprising about all this to me was this line: &amp;gt; So modern DRAM manufacturing is an extraordinarily complex and expensive process. Building a single state-of-the-art DRAM fabrication facility, a “fab,” will cost you about $15 to $20 billion; acquiring all the necessary equipment, like lithography tools and etching machines, will cost you another few billion; and then it’ll take you a few years of producing substandard and defective memory chips before your yields start to look…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that tech giants like Apple should vertically integrate to stabilize supply, others point out that memory is a historically low-margin, boom-and-bust commodity that Apple prefers to buy using &amp;#34;other people&amp;#39;s money&amp;#34; to protect their own high profit margins &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48230763&quot; title=&quot;And what happens if the market settles back down or the leading memory tech pivots away from what you invested all this capital and time chasing? You&amp;#39;d need a very strong, very particular forecast to make such a costly bet. And conversely, it may say something about their internal forecasts that they&amp;#39;re not making the bet.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48231062&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; it seems they&amp;#39;d be a prime candidate to spin up their own memory fab. While Apple et al certainly have the money to tilt up their own fab, they&amp;#39;re savvy enough to understand the memory market&amp;#39;s long history of constant boom/bust cycles. I still remember the huge DRAM shortage in late 80s forcing my startup at the time to delay launching our new product for a year. People assume Apple cares about vertically integrating cost but they&amp;#39;re actually focused on integrating margin . Apple has…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also features a sharp divide over the role of capitalism: some blame the system for prioritizing corporate profits over societal needs and affordable housing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48230775&quot; title=&quot;Literally the most overwhelming thought, reading this, is &amp;#39;man, capitalism is a mistake&amp;#39; The amounts of money circulating whilst some of us struggle to make rent ... Nothing fair, or just, about this world we live in&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48230873&quot; title=&quot;Why should society care about people making profits? Society would greatly benefit from cheap abundant ram than FAANG shares going up. I&amp;#39;m kinda sick about only caring that some billionaire makes more money and would rather you know... actually improve conditions to better society. This is why China is eating the West. Quite easy to start an electronics company when you have such an abundance of suppliers, compare this to America where there is maybe one or two players in the entire nation.…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, while others credit it for the massive technological deflation that turned $6,000 1980s computers into $30 modern smartphones &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48230807&quot; title=&quot;Courtesy of TFA and capitalism: &amp;#39;In 1985, if you were a reasonably affluent American, the best computer that you could afford was the IBM PC AT. The PC AT would cost you about $6,000—$19,400 in 2026 dollars—and thus represented about a quarter of the median American’s annual income; and it ran on an Intel 80286 processor, capable of something like 900,000 instructions per second. Today, if you find yourself in a market stall in Nairobi or Lagos, you’ll be able to find a cheap smartphone—like…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48231104&quot; title=&quot;China going capitalist ( while remaining authoritarian ) has helped lift 800 million out of desperate poverty. I hope that India too can emulate this in my lifetime.  I was born in Kerala and would love to see Indians live in a country that is as wealthy per capita ( PPP adjusted ) as  Singapore or failing that even as wealthy as the USA. Capitalism has it&amp;#39;s problems.  But you struggling with rent is entirely your self-inflicted problem...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://noslopgrenade.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Throwing AI-generated walls of text into conversations&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (noslopgrenade.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48219992&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;703 points · 418 comments · by napolux&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#34;no slop grenade&amp;#34; initiative urges people to stop pasting long, AI-generated responses into casual conversations, arguing that these &amp;#34;walls of text&amp;#34; destroy meaningful dialogue and waste the recipient&amp;#39;s time. &lt;a href=&quot;https://noslopgrenade.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: no slop grenade    URL Source: https://noslopgrenade.com/    Markdown Content:  # no slop grenade    # no slop grenade.    Stop throwing AI-generated walls of text into conversations.    Don&amp;#39;t do this    You 2:15 PM    Should we use Redis or Memcached?    Them 2:16 PM    Great question! The choice between Redis and Memcached is a nuanced decision that requires careful consideration of multiple factors. Let me break down the key differences: Redis offers a rich set of data structures including strings,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The use of AI-generated &amp;#34;walls of text&amp;#34; in professional communication is widely criticized as &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; that destroys the medium of chat by burying simple answers in unnecessary verbosity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48221973&quot; title=&quot;When I&amp;#39;m encountering some WoT like that, I&amp;#39;d like to have a button like &amp;#39;view source&amp;#39;, but for &amp;#39;view prompt&amp;#39;. Most ai generated messages or docs are unnecessarily verbose and just reading the prompt would suffice. I don&amp;#39;t really get why some people seem to think that it&amp;#39;s somehow better to have their bullet point prompt as a huge text. It just wastes my time. And probably only makes it look like it took more effort than it actually did (it may be the exact opposite).&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48220826&quot; title=&quot;This is slop too though, right? &amp;gt; Pasting a massive AI-generated response into a chat or email where a human would write one sentence. It destroys the medium itself. Nobody writes essays in Slack. It&amp;#39;s only possible because of AI copy-paste. &amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s like calling someone and asking &amp;#39;What time is the meeting?&amp;#39; and they read you a 10-page analysis of calendar management best practices. You asked a simple question. They lobbed a document. It’s hard to take the site seriously if the author themself…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue these responses should be viewed with cultural grace as a well-intentioned but indirect way of saying &amp;#34;I don&amp;#39;t know,&amp;#34; others maintain that acting in good faith requires editing the output for brevity and disclosing its AI origin &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48224168&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve decided that I&amp;#39;m done being pissy about this kind of response, or thinking that it&amp;#39;s something that can be coached away. I choose to look at it like any other cultural communication difference - something that you learn about, try to give some grace to, and work a little harder to bridge (unless you&amp;#39;re defusing a bomb, performing surgery, flying an airplane etc.). In this person&amp;#39;s communication culture, they are saying &amp;#39;I don&amp;#39;t know, but here&amp;#39;s my attempt to help.&amp;#39; For me, it really comes…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48224285&quot; title=&quot;To me, acting in good faith means saying something like &amp;#39;I&amp;#39;m not sure, but Claude says this, which sounds right: [short informative clip from Claude&amp;#39;s wall of text]&amp;#39;. Don&amp;#39;t pretend it&amp;#39;s your response, make sure it has info you think is useful, and edit it down.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48224840&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; To me &amp;gt; I&amp;#39;d prefer This is exactly my point. To some people, direct communication, especially &amp;#39;no&amp;#39;, is extremely rude. To some people, a head bob (easily confused for a &amp;#39;yes&amp;#39; in other cultures) merely means acknowledgement, or &amp;#39;maybe&amp;#39;. To some people, extended silence indicates deep consideration or respect. Globalization resulted in a need to tolerate these differences, and in my experience, trying to &amp;#39;fix&amp;#39; them is considered rude (I suppose that&amp;#39;s also a cultural norm!). I just think it&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics emphasize that if a user wanted an AI&amp;#39;s perspective, they could consult one themselves, and that forcing others to read unedited chat logs is as tedious as listening to someone describe a dream &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48224480&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d prefer just &amp;#39;I don&amp;#39;t know.&amp;#39; I can ask Claude on my own.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48228801&quot; title=&quot;AI conversations are like dreams: everyone has one they like and wants to share it with others ... but no on gives a crap about your dream/chat session, because it was uniquely appealing to you , and not them. Don&amp;#39;t bore your co-workers (or others) with descriptions of your dreams, and don&amp;#39;t throw a computer&amp;#39;s dreams (AI chat logs) at them either.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.0xsid.com/blog/antigravity-bait-n-switch&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Google&amp;#39;s Antigravity bait and switch&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0xsid.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48222529&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;764 points · 340 comments · by ssiddharth&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google’s &amp;#34;Antigravity&amp;#34; update at I/O 2026 replaced its traditional IDE with a chatbot interface, forcing users to perform a total system purge and manual reinstallation to restore the original development environment and its predictable workflow. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.0xsid.com/blog/antigravity-bait-n-switch&quot; title=&quot;Title: Google&amp;#39;s Antigravity Bait and Switch    URL Source: https://www.0xsid.com/blog/antigravity-bait-n-switch    Markdown Content:  The day was to begin like any other, with Antigravity open (yes, there are tens of us!), expecting to get some work done before my attention fragments. But Google had other plans. They had rolled out a new version of Antigravity the day before, at [I/O 2026](https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/technology/developers-tools/google-io-2026-developer-highlights/),…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google’s decision to pivot &amp;#34;Antigravity&amp;#34; from a specialized IDE to a general agentic CLI tool is criticized as a &amp;#34;bait and switch&amp;#34; that disregards existing users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48223956&quot; title=&quot;I never really used the Antigravity IDE, but had it installed. The update also made me do a double take and wonder what the hell was going on. It seems like Google is hitting the reset button on the product they call &amp;#39;Antigravity&amp;#39;, existing users be damned. Fine, if you&amp;#39;ve never installed or used the previous version before... but for existing users the &amp;#39;bait and switch&amp;#39; is incredibly disorientating. My take is they saw the market size for a general agentic tool as being larger and more…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48224000&quot; title=&quot;They could just call it anything else and left the existing user alone. I mean they have gemini CLI, which I would say a better product.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters attribute this move to Google’s broader pattern of &amp;#34;shooting itself in the foot&amp;#34; by neglecting legacy support and failing to focus on a cohesive product identity compared to other AI labs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48222980&quot; title=&quot;How did Google blow their AI lead? Why is Google the 2nd or 3rd tier player in the AI coding market? Why can&amp;#39;t GCP supplant AWS? Because google can&amp;#39;t help but constantly shoot its customers and itself in the foot.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48223003&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m very surprised, goggle are usually known for their customer focused approach and long standing support of legacy systems!&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48223461&quot; title=&quot;Google made its lack of interest in Antigravity IDE obvious from very early. Updates were few and far between and app-breaking bugs stuck around, despite tons of reports. Google&amp;#39;s lack of focus is astounding. They sprinkle random products here and there and seem to then tepidly pick the product surface that is doing least bad and then tepidly focus on that. Compare that to every other AI lab, large and small that knows its identity and shaped its products around that. Perhaps it&amp;#39;s a sort of…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate whether Google ever truly held an AI lead &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48223121&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; How did Google blow their AI lead? What lead? Maybe because I&amp;#39;m mostly using AI/LLMs for development, but neither Google, Anthropic, xAI or anyone else has ever been in the lead, OpenAI always had the best models in my mind, as long as you&amp;#39;re comparing the &amp;#39;top&amp;#39; plans between all of them. Besides, they all seem to shoot themselves in the foot, OpenAI included, seems the only thing that differs is how often and how big the damage is.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that the disruption highlights the risks of using closed-source IDEs over more flexible, open-source CLI agents &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48223697&quot; title=&quot;I was surprised people were so willing to jump to closed source IDEs just for access to coding agents. The trade-off you pay for tight integration between the IDE and the coding agent is lock-in because the barrier to switching IDEs is nontrivial. Your coding environment stands a lower chance of disruption when you use an open source IDE with a CLI agent. Yes it&amp;#39;s slightly annoying to separate the agent from the IDE but the benefit is that it&amp;#39;s much easier to switch between Claude Code, Codex,…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48224398&quot; title=&quot;Closed source IDEs are if anything the norm: Visual Studio, Android Studio, XCode, IntelliJ, CLion, PyCharm, etc... Even in the &amp;#39;fancy text editor&amp;#39; category things like Sublime were always popular enough.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thehandbasket.co/p/hating-ai-is-good-actually&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Shunning AI is the human choice&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (thehandbasket.co)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48222366&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;370 points · &lt;strong&gt;538 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by cdrnsf&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Public skepticism toward artificial intelligence is growing as high-profile errors, ethical concerns, and forced adoption by tech elites spark a &amp;#34;rebellion&amp;#34; against the technology&amp;#39;s perceived inevitability. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thehandbasket.co/p/hating-ai-is-good-actually&quot; title=&quot;Title: Hating AI is good, actually    URL Source: https://www.thehandbasket.co/p/hating-ai-is-good-actually    Published Time: 2026-05-20T21:17:14.563Z    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1](https://media.beehiiv.com/cdn-cgi/image/fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,quality=80/uploads/asset/file/12f64063-69e4-4540-8f25-5c0464768cdc/Screenshot_2026-05-20_at_4.36.54_PM.png?t=1779311460)    [Ex-Google CEO Eric Schmidt while being booed]    Jonah Peretti is very lucky. Buzzfeed—the viral media company he…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether AI is an inevitable technological shift or a flawed trend driven by unethical practices. Proponents argue that AI is &amp;#34;here to stay&amp;#34; and that resisting it is as futile as ignoring the early internet or databases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48222451&quot; title=&quot;These people are going to have a really hard time coming to grips with reality in the next few years. AI is here to stay, and it&amp;#39;s expanding very rapidly. If you can&amp;#39;t fight them, join them.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48222521&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s a normative argument in the parent that&amp;#39;s reasonable to engage and rebut, but there&amp;#39;s also a positive component that&amp;#39;s less easy to take issue with. It really isn&amp;#39;t going anywhere, no matter what world you want to live in. People were upset about databases in the 1980s (some still are).&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48222539&quot; title=&quot;My wife is a former journalist and was beginning her career when the web began to take off. All the old editors and reporters in her industry blew off the Internet,  blogs, and web publishing in general. They thought no one will ever quit buying papers, it was a staple of modern life! She tried to clue them in but hit a brick wall ever time. I feel like history is repeating. I use AI regularly, where it works it works very well for me. I&amp;#39;ve helped two people now who are not developers get…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, with some viewing automation as a path toward human flourishing by eliminating drudgery &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48222830&quot; title=&quot;Counterpoint: Work sucks. Of the billions of workers on the planet, the number of them who love their job and would truly be doing it even if they didn&amp;#39;t need to in order to survive is probably in the low single digits. Hating work is good, wanting it to all be automated is good. It is a pro-human flourishing stance, whereas keeping the majority of humanity laboring in jobs they dislike just to survive is against human flourishing in favor of the status quo.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, critics contend that the technology is built on &amp;#34;theft&amp;#34; and ecological harm &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48223192&quot; title=&quot;I don’t think it’s only that. I personally hate AI not because of CEOs and co, but because the tech is intrinsically born out of theft, and is still, to this day, evolving thanks to theft. And that’s even before the ecological considerations.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, suggesting that current models may have already peaked due to data poisoning and high costs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48222990&quot; title=&quot;The hate around AI is entirely earned by the CEOs of the companies pushing the   frontier models and integrating them into social media. Spending time and compute on generative audio and video was incredibly short-sighted. I think it was born of some arrogance that they were speeding towards the inevitability of AGI and now they&amp;#39;re stuck with models that are as good as they&amp;#39;re going to be due to poisoning, and very expensive bills that will be coming due in the coming months and years. They…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see the backlash as a vocal minority ignoring widespread adoption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48222470&quot; title=&quot;Interesting what the disconnect is between what the vocal minority say about AI versus the vast majority who use it every day and do not care, such as coders and even regular people, as ChatGPT has almost a billion users.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that disliking the social and economic consequences of AI is a valid human choice that should not be dismissed as mere Luddism &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48222487&quot; title=&quot;AI as a tech is fine. But disliking it and the social/economic effects around it is fine too, people should be allowed to feel however they want to feel about certain techs and situations. To recommend people to suck it up is not the answer I wish in the society I want to live in.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48223215&quot; title=&quot;What makes you say that AI is not going anywhere? I hear this overwhelmingly, &amp;#39;AI is here to stay&amp;#39;, as if y&amp;#39;all are so caught up in the movement that you&amp;#39;ve started taking that conclusion as being the axiom. TBH, it feels like a religion.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/21/waymo-pauses-atlanta-service-as-its-robotaxis-keep-driving-into-floods/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Waymo pauses Atlanta service as its robotaxis keep driving into floods&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techcrunch.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225426&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;366 points · &lt;strong&gt;472 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by mattas&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Waymo has suspended its robotaxi services in Atlanta, San Antonio, Dallas, and Houston after vehicles repeatedly drove into flooded streets, following a recent software recall intended to address the issue. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/21/waymo-pauses-atlanta-service-as-its-robotaxis-keep-driving-into-floods/&quot; title=&quot;Waymo expands pause to four cities as robotaxis keep driving into floods | TechCrunch    Waymo&amp;#39;s robotaxi service is now suspended in both Atlanta and San Antonio, as the company works to stop its vehicles from driving into flooded roads.    [![](https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/tc-lockup.svg) TechCrunch Desktop Logo](https://techcrunch.com)    [![](https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/tc-logo-mobile.svg) TechCrunch Mobile Logo](https://techcrunch.com)    *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Waymo service pause in Atlanta has sparked debate over whether driving into floods represents a standard &amp;#34;edge case&amp;#34; for iterative training &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48226883&quot; title=&quot;To me this doesn&amp;#39;t seem like a disaster but just the kind of thing that happens as you role out a service and expose it to new challenges. Presumably they haven&amp;#39;t had the chance to do a lot of flood training but now they have that chance. The huge advantage they have over people in general is that ideally if they figure this out then it will stay figured out. Then they can slowly role out and watch for the next hitches from new situations.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48226864&quot; title=&quot;The &amp;#39;responsible adults&amp;#39; know that chasing perfection gets you nowhere fast. A part of growing up is learning to put up with &amp;#39;good enough&amp;#39;. A car that only fails in a road conditions edge case is good enough for the vast majority of cases. You accept that, and issue a manual override for when that edge case pops up. Then you add that edge case to your training sets. Then the issue never comes up again. If you think that &amp;#39;flooded roadway&amp;#39; is a case that&amp;#39;s handled gracefully by every human…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt; or a fundamental failure of AI intelligence after decades of development &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48226506&quot; title=&quot;This is really my bear case against AI. I am not against it. I actually think it  is really neat!  But we have been working on driverless cars for how long and spent how much? And still things like a flooded roadway completely throw them. Tesla failed to deliver driverless cars but now is pivoting to the much more complex fully autonomous robots. And we can’t get AI to stop hallucinating facts, but any day we are going to be at AGI in a few years? I get people want these things to happen, but I…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48227298&quot; title=&quot;I am a little worried that this is still a problem after 20 years. Don&amp;#39;t they have simulators to test every weird and unexpected road condition offline? And flooded roads aren&amp;#39;t exactly an unusual event to begin with.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that these errors mirror human fallibility, noting that many local drivers also ruined their cars in the same floods &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225949&quot; title=&quot;Driving through an obviously flooded street thinking &amp;#39;I&amp;#39;ll easily make it&amp;#39; and getting stuck in the middle? Yeah, these cars have achieved human level intelligence.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48227676&quot; title=&quot;In ATL this happens often enough that it&amp;#39;s not a shock when it happens, we have lots of drainage problems here. I agree that I would have assumed Waymo had tested in events like this, but clearly not. So what I can say is running in ATL is a great test case for these events, and also the people who live here don&amp;#39;t do a better job than Waymo did. There were dozens of people who ruined their cars yesterday trying to drive through deep water.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48226864&quot; title=&quot;The &amp;#39;responsible adults&amp;#39; know that chasing perfection gets you nowhere fast. A part of growing up is learning to put up with &amp;#39;good enough&amp;#39;. A car that only fails in a road conditions edge case is good enough for the vast majority of cases. You accept that, and issue a manual override for when that edge case pops up. Then you add that edge case to your training sets. Then the issue never comes up again. If you think that &amp;#39;flooded roadway&amp;#39; is a case that&amp;#39;s handled gracefully by every human…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the inability to handle common road conditions challenges the industry&amp;#39;s optimistic timelines for full autonomy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48226506&quot; title=&quot;This is really my bear case against AI. I am not against it. I actually think it  is really neat!  But we have been working on driverless cars for how long and spent how much? And still things like a flooded roadway completely throw them. Tesla failed to deliver driverless cars but now is pivoting to the much more complex fully autonomous robots. And we can’t get AI to stop hallucinating facts, but any day we are going to be at AGI in a few years? I get people want these things to happen, but I…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225717&quot; title=&quot;Snark aside, there will probably always be conditions in which waymo is not the right answer. Are they going to do hurricane evacuation? I think removing the driver just necessitates this.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents of the technology suggest that once these scenarios are solved, the fix is permanent and scalable, potentially leading to safer outcomes like more efficient emergency evacuations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48226883&quot; title=&quot;To me this doesn&amp;#39;t seem like a disaster but just the kind of thing that happens as you role out a service and expose it to new challenges. Presumably they haven&amp;#39;t had the chance to do a lot of flood training but now they have that chance. The huge advantage they have over people in general is that ideally if they figure this out then it will stay figured out. Then they can slowly role out and watch for the next hitches from new situations.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225888&quot; title=&quot;While this is going to be an overly optimistic scenario: Imagine how smooth a hurricane evacuation would go if _everyone_ used a self-driving car to do the evacuation - atleast there might be less gridlock than there is during any usual hurricane evacuations. And assuming the self driving cars don&amp;#39;t do something stupid that causes every car behind it to essentially lock up and stop moving That said, I know a scenario like that would never happen, probably for the best.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://prismreports.org/2026/05/20/seattle-shield-private-companies-surveillance/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Seattle Shield, an intelligence-sharing network operated by the Seattle police&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (prismreports.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48226588&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;488 points · 205 comments · by root-parent&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seattle Shield is a secretive intelligence-sharing network operated by the Seattle Police Department that allows private corporations like Amazon and Facebook to exchange surveillance data and suspicious activity reports with federal agencies like ICE and the FBI, primarily to monitor local protests. &lt;a href=&quot;https://prismreports.org/2026/05/20/seattle-shield-private-companies-surveillance/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Amazon, Facebook, ICE, and the FBI have access to a private intelligence-sharing network operated by Seattle police    URL Source: https://prismreports.org/2026/05/20/seattle-shield-private-companies-surveillance/    Published Time: 2026-05-20T19:47:39+00:00    Markdown Content:  _Real journalists wrote and edited this (not AI)—independent, community-driven journalism survives because you back it.[Donate](https://prismreports.org/ways-to-give/)to sustain Prism’s mission and the humans behind…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on whether Seattle Shield represents a dangerous &amp;#34;Panopticon&amp;#34; lacking oversight or a standard, &amp;#34;nothingburger&amp;#34; information-sharing network for local security &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48227976&quot; title=&quot;My thoughts as someone who doesn&amp;#39;t know much about these types of things: 1. Terry Albury calling this list the &amp;#39;Panopticon&amp;#39; could have merit since he&amp;#39;s a former FBI agent. However, I&amp;#39;d have to research more into him to figure out how credible he is, and why he is framing it like this. 2. Amazon and Facebook being in the title is most likely clickbait. They&amp;#39;re literally only mentioned once in the article and the rest of it has nothing to do with them. 3. It&amp;#39;s concerning that the National…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48226805&quot; title=&quot;Looks like a nothingburger?  It&amp;#39;s unfunded. An email describes a protest without giving a framing that the site would prefer. Then it turns out that nobody knows what it does, but it might do something bad. I&amp;#39;m all for transparency and accountability but my assumption is that the bad things being done by LEO and intelligence are far worse than this.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that such collaborations between police and private entities like Amazon or Scientology are reasonable for public safety, others contend that participants are actively enabling state surveillance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48227415&quot; title=&quot;Reminder if you work for any of these companies (not unlikely on this site) you are actively enabling this. If your first reaction is doubt, deflection, rationalization or discomfort, there are ways out.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48226861&quot; title=&quot;Scientology is essentially a scheme to get private/incriminating information from very important people. Why the surprise?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48227749&quot; title=&quot;Or perhaps when Amazon facilities security encounters someone doing destructive or harmful things, then sharing that information with other companies in the city is a perfectly reasonable measure? This is functionally no different than sharing your encounters with disruptive people on NextDoor.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Concerns were also raised regarding the potential for these networks to mislabel protesters as terrorists under federal guidelines, though some note that secrecy is often a legal requirement for government investigations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48227976&quot; title=&quot;My thoughts as someone who doesn&amp;#39;t know much about these types of things: 1. Terry Albury calling this list the &amp;#39;Panopticon&amp;#39; could have merit since he&amp;#39;s a former FBI agent. However, I&amp;#39;d have to research more into him to figure out how credible he is, and why he is framing it like this. 2. Amazon and Facebook being in the title is most likely clickbait. They&amp;#39;re literally only mentioned once in the article and the rest of it has nothing to do with them. 3. It&amp;#39;s concerning that the National…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48228112&quot; title=&quot;The thing is... under the laws as they&amp;#39;re written today, if US Gov wants to take a peek at your stuff on FB and friends servers, FB can be barred from informing you that such a request has come in under the National Security Letter (NSL) guidelines. It&amp;#39;s a very complicated thing :/.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48228221&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t mean to be some annoying contrarian or something, but couldn&amp;#39;t it be the case that if the govt was investing someone who was planning a terrorist attack, then notifying the person being investigated could work against stopping them? Not saying it wouldn&amp;#39;t get abused though, which seems like the primary concern of most people in these discussions..&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.changs.co.uk/python-315-features-that-didnt-make-the-headlines.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Python 3.15: features that didn&amp;#39;t make the headlines&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.changs.co.uk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48220696&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;428 points · 218 comments · by rbanffy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Python 3.15 introduces several lesser-known features, including graceful `TaskGroup` cancellation in asyncio, improved `ContextDecorator` support for async functions and generators, thread-safe iterator utilities, a symmetric difference operator for `collections.Counter`, and new hooks for parsing JSON into immutable objects. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.changs.co.uk/python-315-features-that-didnt-make-the-headlines.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Python 3.15: features that didn&amp;#39;t make the headlines    URL Source: https://blog.changs.co.uk/python-315-features-that-didnt-make-the-headlines.html    Published Time: Thu, 14 May 2026 10:01:41 GMT    Markdown Content:  It&amp;#39;s that time of the year again, a new version of Python is just around the corner. With the [Python 3.15.0b1](https://docs.python.org/3.15/whatsnew/3.15.html) feature freeze, we know what&amp;#39;s coming to Python later this year. There are so many big features coming including [lazy…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a growing trend of developers migrating from Python to faster, more reliable languages like Go and Rust, noting that AI-assisted coding has made switching languages easier than anticipated &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48221055&quot; title=&quot;I was so into Python for 10 years, was enjoyable to work in. But have deleted 100k+ lines this year already moving them to faster languages in a post AI codebot world. Mostly moving to go these days.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48221205&quot; title=&quot;Same, I’m not sure how Python survives this outside of machine learning. All of our services we were our are significantly faster and more reliable. We used Rust, it wasn’t hard to do&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48221270&quot; title=&quot;the funny thing is that everyone, including myself, posited that python would be the winner of the ai coding wars, because of how much training data there is for it. My experience has been the opposite.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users appreciate new developer-friendly features like cross-language error suggestions for common method names &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48222404&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; When an AttributeError on a builtin type has no close match via Levenshtein distance, the error message now checks a static table of common method names from other languages (JavaScript, Java, Ruby, C#) and suggests the Python equivalent Oh, that is such a nice thing.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225354&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s unrelated to the lazy keyword. Instead it&amp;#39;s another feature related to error messages. The example: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;#39;hello&amp;#39;.toUpperCase()    Traceback (most recent call last):    ...    AttributeError: &amp;#39;str&amp;#39; object has no attribute &amp;#39;toUpperCase&amp;#39;. Did you mean &amp;#39;.upper&amp;#39;?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others debate whether features like lazy imports are necessary optimizations or merely &amp;#34;bandaids&amp;#34; for bloated codebases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48221459&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Python is such a weird language. Lazy imports are a bandaid for AI code base monstrosities with 1000 imports Just because you don’t like a feature doesn’t mean it’s because of AI and bad code.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48221524&quot; title=&quot;I think this is just a natural consequence of an easy-to-use package system. The exact same story as with node. If you don&amp;#39;t want lots of imports, don&amp;#39;t make it so damn easy to pile them into projects. I&amp;#39;m frankly surprised we still see so few supply chain attacks, even though they picked up their cadence dramatically.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the shift toward performance-oriented languages, Python remains a common starting point for beginners, though its long-term dominance outside of machine learning is being questioned &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48221205&quot; title=&quot;Same, I’m not sure how Python survives this outside of machine learning. All of our services we were our are significantly faster and more reliable. We used Rust, it wasn’t hard to do&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48221735&quot; title=&quot;Interested in why you&amp;#39;d use Python in the first place? Advice for someone who knows nothing about programming - what would you suggest?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://freenet.org/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Freenet, a peer-to-peer platform for decentralized apps&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (freenet.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48223362&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;378 points · 268 comments · by sanity&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Freenet is a new peer-to-peer platform that uses WebAssembly contracts and a global decentralized key-value store to host apps like group chats and CMSs without centralized servers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://freenet.org/&quot; title=&quot;For the past 5 years or so I&amp;amp;#x27;ve been working on a ground-up redesign of Freenet, my peer-to-peer project from the early 2000s (now renamed Hyphanet).&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;The new Freenet has been up and running since December along with some early applications like River[1], our decentralized group chat and Delta - a decentralized CMS. Users have already started to build their own apps on Freenet including games, and we have some interesting apps in development like Atlas, a search&amp;amp;#x2F;recommendation…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The launch of the new Freenet platform is overshadowed by a contentious dispute regarding its governance, with critics alleging that a &amp;#34;board&amp;#34; inactive for a decade forced a rewrite and repurposed the project&amp;#39;s funding without consulting the original development team &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48228427&quot; title=&quot;Notably this project was conceived by a backroom decision to dump the original Freenet development team&amp;#39;s work, in favor of a rewrite from different developers, without asking anyone on the original team. It was an ivory tower decision which was announced on the mailing list without prior discussion. The old team did not agree, yet it was forced through by a decision of the &amp;#39;board&amp;#39;. The &amp;#39;board&amp;#39; was a group of people which had not been active on the project for over a decade.…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48228723&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; and after over a year of debate There was no &amp;#39;year of debate&amp;#39;. You came to the mailing list and announced it for the first time as a finalized decision already, without any prior debate with the original team. The &amp;#39;board&amp;#39; you cited as the body which allegedly discussed it did neither join the mailing list discussion, nor were you willing to hand out their contact info. It&amp;#39;s all public for anyone to see on the mailing list archive:…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this is a standard open-source fork, others contend that the &amp;#34;Freenet&amp;#34; name was misappropriated for a codebase that abandons the original goal of anonymity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48228427&quot; title=&quot;Notably this project was conceived by a backroom decision to dump the original Freenet development team&amp;#39;s work, in favor of a rewrite from different developers, without asking anyone on the original team. It was an ivory tower decision which was announced on the mailing list without prior discussion. The old team did not agree, yet it was forced through by a decision of the &amp;#39;board&amp;#39;. The &amp;#39;board&amp;#39; was a group of people which had not been active on the project for over a decade.…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48229025&quot; title=&quot;The issue is that the original name, &amp;#39;Freenet&amp;#39;, was repurposed for a different codebase.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48229287&quot; title=&quot;Different codebase, same purpose. This isn&amp;#39;t even the first time we did a ground-up redesign/rewrite of the Freenet codebase, we did this in 2008 with the 0.7 release.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical discussions focus on the project&amp;#39;s unique state-merging solution for consistency and a &amp;#34;ghost key&amp;#34; reputation system, though some users express concern that requiring donations to the Freenet Foundation for identity undermines decentralization &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48228115&quot; title=&quot;Very cool project! &amp;gt; We&amp;#39;ve developed a unique (AFAIK) solution to the consistency problem, every contract must define a &amp;#39;merge&amp;#39; operation for the contract&amp;#39;s associated state. This operation must be commutative, meaning that you can merge multiple states in any order and you&amp;#39;ll get the same end result. Where can I learn more about this? How is this different from CRDTs/CmRDTs?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48228253&quot; title=&quot;I think better approach for &amp;#39;ghost keys&amp;#39; would be requiring X amount of crypto to be sent to 0x0 (burning). Current implementation (requiring donation to freenet) basically gives freenet foundation infinite reputation (including any other potential project that would accept ghost keys as identity), kinda breaking the decentralization aspect&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://vivaldi.com/blog/vivaldi-on-desktop-8-0/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Vivaldi 8.0&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (vivaldi.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48219060&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;368 points · 244 comments · by OuterVale&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Vivaldi 8.0 introduces a major &amp;#34;Unified&amp;#34; design overhaul that removes visual boundaries between toolbars and tabs, alongside six new preset layouts—including Simple, Auto Hide, and Vertical—to help users customize their browsing experience. &lt;a href=&quot;https://vivaldi.com/blog/vivaldi-on-desktop-8-0/&quot; title=&quot;Vivaldi 8.0: our biggest design overhaul, ever | Vivaldi Browser    More than thirteen years in, and I am still as excited about building this browser as I was on day one. Maybe more. That excitement comes from a genuine belief that the people who use Vivaldi deserve…    * [Browser](/desktop/)      + [Vivaldi on Desktop](/desktop/)    + [Vivaldi on Android](/android/)    + [Vivaldi on iOS](/ios/)    + [Automotive](/android/automotive/)    + [Download](/download/)  * [Mail](/features/mail/)      +…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Vivaldi is praised by users for its sustainable business model, built-in ad blocking, and superior handling of features like print rendering and mouse gestures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48220297&quot; title=&quot;Guys use Vivaldi. It&amp;#39;s a present. A browser that has a sustainable business model and interests that reconcile with the user interests - consume the web as god intended, with no literally aids and cancer ads out of the box. I switched a while ago from Firefox and while the UI is.. different, it&amp;#39;s been a great experience. In my opinion this project and the great people behind it must be the leaders of this industry, and not the current crooked and twisted hegemony we have now. I&amp;#39;m not…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48219503&quot; title=&quot;With Firefox, especially with Firefox on Linux, which always had and still has poor GPU support, I frequently encounter sites that do not work well or they do not work at all. So I must keep a backup browser, which is normally Vivaldi, because typically any site that works in Chrome also works in Vivaldi. Moreover, Vivaldi has a great advantage over both Firefox and Chrome, in it the command to print a Web page usually works fine, while in both Firefox and Chrome it almost never works…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48219344&quot; title=&quot;Vivaldi is the browser, where I always wonder why it doesn&amp;#39;t get mentioned in all the privacy enhanced browsers. It&amp;#39;s the only browser for me, that reliably filters out all ads with ublock origin while working on all websites without any problems. Also the company behind Vivaldi is not in USA/China/Russia, which also helps from my point of view.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. However, significant debate exists regarding its reliance on the Blink engine, which some view as reinforcing Google&amp;#39;s hegemony over web standards compared to using Firefox &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48220781&quot; title=&quot;The real hegemony is the Blink hegemony. Google (an advertising company) can pretty much unilaterally dictate web standards. A terrible state of affairs for the web. That&amp;#39;s the real issue and using another Chrome reskin is never going to fix it.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48224700&quot; title=&quot;This is the main reason I stay away from Vivaldi; using Firefox is, for all of Mozilla&amp;#39;s borderline comical mismanagement, a protest vote against Blink (and previously, Chromium).&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48224888&quot; title=&quot;Firefox is controlled opposition practically owned by Google. Follow the money. Ladybird seems to be the only hope, once available.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics also express concerns over its partially closed-source nature and lack of extension support on Android, while proponents argue it offers better site compatibility and privacy than its competitors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48219503&quot; title=&quot;With Firefox, especially with Firefox on Linux, which always had and still has poor GPU support, I frequently encounter sites that do not work well or they do not work at all. So I must keep a backup browser, which is normally Vivaldi, because typically any site that works in Chrome also works in Vivaldi. Moreover, Vivaldi has a great advantage over both Firefox and Chrome, in it the command to print a Web page usually works fine, while in both Firefox and Chrome it almost never works…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48220717&quot; title=&quot;a closed-source browser is a non-starter for me.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48219369&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d like to try Vivaldi, but the combination of being (partially) closed-source [1] and free-as-in-beer makes me feel like I must be the product. Do they do any sort of third-party auditing of the closed parts? [1] https://vivaldi.com/blog/technology/why-isnt-vivaldi-browser...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48219233&quot; title=&quot;Vivaldi is all about customization but then they categorically refuse to add extension support to their android browser. Imo extension is the ultimate way to customize your browser experience. It&amp;#39;s not technical difficulties, there are open source projects that have such support. I also don&amp;#39;t believe it&amp;#39;s against any TOS because some of these browser are available in the Google play store. I just don&amp;#39;t get why they refuse to do that.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.simbastack.com/indexed-a-year-of-video-locally/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Indexing a year of video locally on a 2021 MacBook with Gemma4-31B (50GB swap)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.simbastack.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48222733&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;469 points · 140 comments · by asenna&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer used a 2021 M1 Max MacBook Pro and the Gemma 4 31B model to locally index a year of video footage, creating searchable, AI-generated metadata sidecars for thousands of clips by utilizing 50GB of swap memory to overcome hardware limitations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.simbastack.com/indexed-a-year-of-video-locally/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Indexing a year of video locally on a 5-year-old M1 Max with Gemma 4 31B    URL Source: https://blog.simbastack.com/indexed-a-year-of-video-locally/    Published Time: 2026-05-21T09:55:22.259Z    Markdown Content:  ## While I slept, my 5-year-old MacBook ran Gemma 4 locally and indexed a year of video    May 21, 2026  I&amp;#39;m in the Maasai Mara about half the year, in three-month stretches. Animals out the front of the lodge, motorcycles, friends in the Maasai villages, kids who think a drone is the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on a project using local LLMs to index personal video archives, with the author releasing the &amp;#34;framedex&amp;#34; tool to the community after initial interest &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48224290&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The skill is open at ~/.claude/skills/video-index/. If you&amp;#39;re working on something similar (indexing personal archives, getting a local model to do real archival work, building agents that drive editing tools), I&amp;#39;d be glad to compare notes. When your Claude wrote this post they might not have selected the right URL to share, unless your home folder is exposed. Care to share the skill files?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48224807&quot; title=&quot;Ok I scrambled to finalize a name for it and create a new repo for it - https://github.com/Simbastack-hq/framedex PS - I just put this together in the last few mins, removed my personal files and references. So it&amp;#39;s not tested properly, please let me know if any issues. It&amp;#39;s still an early hack, but I have thousands of still images as well from my camera which I&amp;#39;ve not processed and I need to do the same analysis for those. So I&amp;#39;ll continue working on it, but happy to receive any PRs if anyone…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While users praised the technical substance and the potential for local models to solve &amp;#34;bottom-up&amp;#34; context collection &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48224337&quot; title=&quot;Thanks for the article! I have a beefy M5 Pro and I&amp;#39;m eagerly looking around for ways to use local models (specifically Gemma4 &amp;amp; Qwen3.6). This is an excellent thing to do. Especially that LLMs excel at batching thus you can index multiple photos and videos in parallel for no performance penalty.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225898&quot; title=&quot;My take is that B2C AI applications are kind of structurally limited by how hard it is to build personalized context. The idea of capable local models could be a huge unlock here if they are able to do the bottom-up context collection research / tagging / etc. at scale.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, there was significant criticism regarding the post&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;painful AI tropes&amp;#34; and writing style &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225719&quot; title=&quot;Hey friend, try something in this ballpark, your post has a bunch of painful AI tropes: https://github.com/blader/humanizer You get a pass here because you&amp;#39;re doing really cool stuff but it&amp;#39;s kinda tough to read past the AI nonsense, and it&amp;#39;s relatively easy to screen out &amp;#39;it&amp;#39;s not x it&amp;#39;s y&amp;#39; kind of things and the bolded bullet points.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. The author acknowledged the difficulty of &amp;#34;de-AI-ing&amp;#34; their thoughts, leading to a meta-discussion on maintaining quality and human voice when using generative tools for content creation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225803&quot; title=&quot;Thanks for this! This is exactly what I was looking for. Tbh, I have a lot of thoughts and ideas and things to share and I do spend time and effort trying to de-AI-ing it but this should help a lot. I&amp;#39;ll try it out. In fact, I was expecting getting shit on by HN readers for this but was pleasantly surprised that readers moved past it.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48226153&quot; title=&quot;Yeah I think you&amp;#39;ll find these days that there&amp;#39;s a lot of respect for substance like what you&amp;#39;re doing, even past the noise of the AI. I also use a lot of AI but you really have to demand quality from it, whether it&amp;#39;s writing, media, or code. It&amp;#39;s clear you&amp;#39;ve got the taste from your media work, and we&amp;#39;re all still learning as we go, so I&amp;#39;m very glad that I could point you in that direction.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48226190&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m curious: how, exactly, did it go from this is painful to read due to AI, to no one cares about AI use and you demanded quality when you used it and delivered?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://crocidb.com/post/this-blog-ran-on-ubuntu-16-04-for-10-years-i-migrated-it-to-freebsd/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Blog ran on Ubuntu 16.04 for 10 years. I migrated it to FreeBSD&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (crocidb.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48227397&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;371 points · 228 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After ten years on an unsupported Ubuntu 16.04 server, the author migrated their blog to a higher-spec Hetzner VPS running FreeBSD. The new setup utilizes FreeBSD Jails and Bastille for containerization, resulting in significantly improved performance and stability in high-load benchmarks compared to the old system. &lt;a href=&quot;https://crocidb.com/post/this-blog-ran-on-ubuntu-16-04-for-10-years-i-migrated-it-to-freebsd/&quot; title=&quot;Title: This blog ran on Ubuntu 16.04 for 10 years. I migrated it to FreeBSD    URL Source: https://crocidb.com/post/this-blog-ran-on-ubuntu-16-04-for-10-years-i-migrated-it-to-freebsd/    Published Time: Thu, 21 May 2026 09:51:05 GMT    Markdown Content:  This blog has been running on a Digital Ocean VPS for over ten years. A machine hosted in New York City, running **Ubuntu 16.04 LTS**. An LTS that hasn’t been in support for at least 5 years. It was about time to change it. After some considerations,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the trade-offs between hosting static sites on a VPS versus using modern cloud services like GitHub Pages or S3/CloudFront, with some arguing that VPS hosting is &amp;#34;objectively inferior&amp;#34; due to security risks and maintenance overhead &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48229210&quot; title=&quot;Boggles my mind that people pay money to host hugo static sites on a VPS, which is objectively inferior and harder in every meaningful way compared to hosting for free on GitHub pages or S3+CloudFront.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48229271&quot; title=&quot;You can make it zero deploy steps beyond git push with CodePipeline, and vibecoding makes the annoying config setup trivial if you know like 20% of what you&amp;#39;re doing. There is really zero reason to be using a VPS for this unless you hate money, want your site to choke during once-in-lifetime opportunities to go life-changingly viral, and like contributing to the global population malicious botnets.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48229532&quot; title=&quot;We have had something vastly better than an individual computer since idk, the mid 90s, called a CDN. I guess if you want to call being informed about the online threat landscape &amp;#39;scared&amp;#39;, that&amp;#39;s your perogative. For me, it&amp;#39;s common sense to avoid completely unnecessary threat vectors to my digital infrastructure, but power to you if you like dealing with extra maintenance overhead and constantly wondering whether you&amp;#39;re providing free cryptomining to some random international criminal.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others defend the VPS approach for its educational value and simplicity, noting that modern cloud setups can be complex to configure and that a small instance can easily handle significant traffic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48229223&quot; title=&quot;s3 + cloudfront takes approximately 2 extra steps every deploy, and about 10 extra steps that are easy to screw up at setup time. It&amp;#39;s not a trivial drop-in, but yes, once it&amp;#39;s done it&amp;#39;s _really_ done.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48229355&quot; title=&quot;This is a blog.... you don&amp;#39;t need some monster machine. You can server TONS of people off the smallest Digital Ocean instance. Many of these small VPSs can be had for less than a couple bucks a month. Tons of popular influencers run their own machines for their blog. insinuating that it&amp;#39;s unsafe to run your own machine is insanity. I don&amp;#39;t understand this mindset of being scared to run your own stuff. Especially if you&amp;#39;re doing doing it at such a large scale there&amp;#39;s nothing wrong with doing it…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Regarding long-term stability, users suggest Debian LTS or RHEL-derivatives like AlmaLinux and Rocky Linux for 10-year support cycles, though some warn that extreme uptime can lead to &amp;#34;technical debt&amp;#34; where the owner eventually forgets how the system was originally configured &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48228636&quot; title=&quot;Slightly off topic: What&amp;#39;s currently the free Linux distribution with the longest support cycle? For a while I used CentOS 7 on all of those small VMs, because it got security updates for a really long time. With minimal risk of breaking things on updates. PS: after a bit of research Alma/Rocky Linux are probably the best choices for now. 10 years of support. But are they maintained well?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48229727&quot; title=&quot;The biggest mistake I made was high uptime. arjie.com was up for 10 years plus on a Hetzner VPS so that by the time they wanted to sunset the machine underlying I had no idea what my teenage self had set up. I have the backups but the site hasn’t been up in a decade… Nowadays I build things so that they move and I have moved things about a bit so I know they work.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48228772&quot; title=&quot;Probably Debian or Ubuntu. The question is...why do you care that much? I&amp;#39;ve upgraded Debian stable (both pure and with some cherry-picked backports) and Ubuntu (non-LTS and LTS) systems in place and rarely broken anything, for years and years. When stuff has broken it&amp;#39;s been a quick google and then slapping myself for not having read the upgrade guide. I do generally wait about 2-3 weeks before upgrading, giving time for them to catch stuff that was missed until the great masses were set loose…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48229067&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; But are they maintained well? Alma has a few affordances as it&amp;#39;s no longer RHEL source compatible, which means it could ship priviledge escalation fixes with new kernel updates faster. Rocky responded with an extra, optional to enable, security repo to provide mitigations to the exploits while waiting for RHEL to downstream. Look pretty well maintained to me. If only judging by recent events.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48229318&quot; title=&quot;Debian LTS/extended LTS&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dougmacdowell.com/50-hours-to-draw-some-lines.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I spent 50 hours drawing a line graph&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (dougmacdowell.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48223997&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;491 points · 85 comments · by dougdude3339&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Doug MacDowell details his 50-hour process of creating a statistically accurate, hand-drawn line graph using vintage drafting tools and manual techniques to explore data visualization as a form of art. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dougmacdowell.com/50-hours-to-draw-some-lines.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: 50 Hours to Draw Some Lines    URL Source: https://www.dougmacdowell.com/50-hours-to-draw-some-lines.html    Published Time: 2026-05-18    Markdown Content:  [Doug MacDowell](https://www.dougmacdowell.com/index.html)[← Projects](https://www.dougmacdowell.com/portfolio.html)    **Description:** I used to live on a quiet road on top of a huge hill. When leaves were on the trees it felt secluded, and when the leaves fell, the entire city would appear below as sparkling lights. Sometimes, I&amp;#39;d run…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The community celebrates the meditative and tactile nature of hand-drawn data visualization, with many users sharing technical advice on tools like lead holders, 6H-9H pencils, and erasing shields &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48257572&quot; title=&quot;I build furniture and while I do my design work digitally for remote clients, I do my shop drawings by hand. One super helpful tip I got from an actual trained draftsman is to use harder pencil lead for your layout and construction lines. Like 6H to 9H. You&amp;#39;ll get a much lighter line to erase later. It&amp;#39;ll also hold a finer point for longer. I prefer lead holders to wooden pencils. They take 2mm lead, and you sharpen them with a lead pointer. K&amp;amp;E pointers are readily available on eBay, as are…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48223998&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s been more interesting to me lately than using software to design data visualizations is learning to draw data by hand. It&amp;#39;s a time consuming process but incredibly rewarding. The feeling of erasing graphite to reveal clean, crisp lines is something that software cannot recreate.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some admire the &amp;#34;midcentury engineering&amp;#34; aesthetic and historical inspirations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48256921&quot; title=&quot;Amazing process (such patience in this day and age!), and special thanks for sharing links to the data viz books! Tufte was my gateway too but I didn’t think to look into books on technical sketching, engineering drawing, and draftsmanship. Love hand-drawn viz, recently I’ve been looking at the French National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies (INSEE) and they have a great collection of all their reports, from pre-1900s to now. I especially appreciate this beautiful one about people…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48256105&quot; title=&quot;They look really good. I really enjoy looking at midcentury engineering charts/diagrams and stuff like jeppesen charts. NASA has a lot of good ones. The way the text looks, the line economy, the general aesthetic. Well worth the effort imo!&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others playfully critique the author&amp;#39;s technical execution, noting inconsistencies in bevel distances, line joints, and kerning &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48256558&quot; title=&quot;This should be a competitive sport, like gymnastics. He&amp;#39;s attempting the bevel! With extra-wide lines! Very ambitious, but unfortunately he often fails to stick the corner alignments, the bevel distances are poorly controlled, and the data is unsuitably spiky for that choice of line joint. 7/10.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48256015&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; A professional draftsman of the 1920&amp;#39;s may cringe at the imperfections in my line graph above. They can suck it. I am willing to suck it but the kerning is still killing me. (I love everything about this btw)&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also highlights classic resources for draftsmanship, such as Calvin Schmid’s handbook and historical INSEE reports, alongside nostalgic tips like rotating a pencil during use to maintain its point &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48256921&quot; title=&quot;Amazing process (such patience in this day and age!), and special thanks for sharing links to the data viz books! Tufte was my gateway too but I didn’t think to look into books on technical sketching, engineering drawing, and draftsmanship. Love hand-drawn viz, recently I’ve been looking at the French National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies (INSEE) and they have a great collection of all their reports, from pre-1900s to now. I especially appreciate this beautiful one about people…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48256683&quot; title=&quot;You should add in Calvin Schmid&amp;#39;s Handbook of Graphic Presentation into your list Doug -- https://archive.org/details/HandbookOfGraphicPresentation/pa... Unfortunately I do not see specific discussion of how to make the lines a consistent thickness. It does have notes on how to sharpen your pencil and how to use a carpenters spline to draw smooth curves though.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48258989&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m old enough that I took drafting in 7th grade. One tip I remember is to turn the pencil slightly as you use it. I think this was to help maintain the pencil&amp;#39;s shape, but there my be other less obvious reasons. I took woodshop too. The shop teacher seemed to enjoy scaring us with stories of the students that goofed off in shop to horrific consequences. That&amp;#39;s also where I learned to be careful with air compressors around open wounds.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://spectrum.ieee.org/trinity-nuclear-test&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Lost Images from the 1945 Trinity Nuclear Test Restored&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (spectrum.ieee.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48220639&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;421 points · 121 comments · by pseudolus&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A new book titled *Trinity: An Illustrated History of the World’s First Atomic Test* features hundreds of restored, vivid photographs from the 1945 Manhattan Project, the result of a 20-year effort to preserve the visual record of the first nuclear detonation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://spectrum.ieee.org/trinity-nuclear-test&quot; title=&quot;Title: Lost Images From the 1945 Trinity Nuclear Test Restored    URL Source: https://spectrum.ieee.org/trinity-nuclear-test    Published Time: 2026-05-15T13:00:01Z    Markdown Content:  At 0.016 seconds after the atomic detonation, the fireball was already hundreds of meters wide. The tiny squares to the left and right in this image are billboards 200 meters from the center of the explosion.    _\_Editor’s note: If you’d like to pinpoint the instant when the world entered the nuclear age, 5:29:45 a.m.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Trinity test is remembered as a pivotal, &amp;#34;unearthly&amp;#34; moment in human history, marking the transition from abstract theoretical physics to a terrifyingly tangible force &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225008&quot; title=&quot;I used to teach a class on the history of contemporary science (WW2-present) and I started the class with Trinity. There’s no other moment better. We know how it turned out, but the people there waiting for the test did not know how it would turn out. The bomb might not have worked. Or it might have ignited a fusion reaction in the atmosphere and destroyed the world. Hans Bethe had sat down and done the calculations on that exact scenario and said it would not, but there was always the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48222080&quot; title=&quot;What I find so strange about the awe and horror of the atom bomb, its utter power and violence, is how it was the result of decades - well, centuries - of abstract thinking in mathematics and theoretical physics. And how it required particularly new paradigms about the nature of the material world. Imagine a cosmic being looking at the Earth through a microscope, and seeing this bubble pop on the surface in mid-20th century. Then another, and another pop. Some of them evaporated hundreds of…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While the restoration of these images highlights the &amp;#34;cosmic horror&amp;#34; of the blast, some critics argue modern cinematic portrayals like *Oppenheimer* fail to capture the unique, non-chemical appearance of the actual explosion &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48221546&quot; title=&quot;One of my big gripes with the film Oppenheimer was the blast itself, obviously a climactic moment in the film. It looked like someone set off a bunch of chemical explosives. That’s not how it looked in real life. Totally bizarre decision. I don’t know if they were trying to avoid effects on purpose of go gritty and retro or something but the “unearthly cosmic horror” feel of the first a-bomb blast is important. It’s what led Oppenheimer to recite “I am become death, destroyer of worlds.”&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also focused on the technical risks of the era, such as the calculated but lingering fear that the bomb might ignite the atmosphere, and the specific engineering of the plutonium core which achieved criticality through implosion rather than the &amp;#34;gun-type&amp;#34; assembly used in other designs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225008&quot; title=&quot;I used to teach a class on the history of contemporary science (WW2-present) and I started the class with Trinity. There’s no other moment better. We know how it turned out, but the people there waiting for the test did not know how it would turn out. The bomb might not have worked. Or it might have ignited a fusion reaction in the atmosphere and destroyed the world. Hans Bethe had sat down and done the calculations on that exact scenario and said it would not, but there was always the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48228861&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Or it might have ignited a fusion reaction in the atmosphere and destroyed the world Someone&amp;#39;s got to explain to me how this was even remotely plausible. We&amp;#39;ve had orders of magnitude more energetic events in earth&amp;#39;s history that they would be aware of (dinosaur slaying asteroid for instance). These didn&amp;#39;t manage to destroy the earth by turning the atmosphere into a fusion reactor. Surely they were aware of this. So was the theory that neutrons are somehow special in a non-thermal way for…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225537&quot; title=&quot;You’re thinking of the other bomb, the U-235 one, which they didn’t test at Trinity and which was dropped on Hiroshima. That is two separate pieces of Uranium that are slammed together to create a critical mass. The Pu-239 core was a single sphere of metal. It was subcritical until you compress it down with a spherical implosion from explosive charges all around it (from the size of a grapefruit to the size of a lime), at which point it reaches a high enough density to go critical.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant disagreement regarding the fate of the &amp;#34;last human,&amp;#34; with some debating whether the end of the species will be a sudden flash of light, a slow&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.loopwerk.io/articles/2026/uv-ux-mess/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Uv is fantastic, but its package management UX is a mess&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (loopwerk.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48228788&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;330 points · 149 comments · by nchagnet&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While praising its speed, this article critiques the Python tool **uv** for its clunky package maintenance UX, specifically citing &amp;#34;unsafe&amp;#34; default version constraints and verbose command syntax compared to competitors like pnpm and Poetry. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.loopwerk.io/articles/2026/uv-ux-mess/&quot; title=&quot;Title: uv is fantastic, but its package management UX is a mess    URL Source: https://www.loopwerk.io/articles/2026/uv-ux-mess/    Published Time: Sun, 24 May 2026 12:13:56 GMT    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: Hero image](https://www.loopwerk.io/articles/heroes/2026-05-21-uv-ux-mess-1480w.webp)  Astral’s [uv](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/) has taken the Python world by storm, and for good reason. It is blisteringly fast, handles Python versions with ease, and replaces a half-dozen tools with a single…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on `uv`&amp;#39;s decision to omit upper version bounds by default, which maintainers argue is a functional necessity to prevent unresolvable dependency trees in Python&amp;#39;s single-resolution environment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48230048&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Note the lack of an upper bound Since uv needs a singular resolution that&amp;#39;s entirely intentional. In npm you can install diverging resolutions for different parts of the tree but that is not an option with Python.  I had to make the same decision in Rye and there is just no better solution here. If an upper bound were to be supplied you would end up with trees that can no longer resolve in practice.  Some package ecosystems in Python even went as far as publishing overrides for old packages…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48230317&quot; title=&quot;(Note: I work on uv.) Much of this is useful feedback, even if phrased in a clickbait style. Some thoughts: - Re: `pnpm outdated`: this is something that hasn&amp;#39;t come up very much, even though it seems reasonable to me. I suspect this comes down to cultural differences between Python and JavaScript -- I can&amp;#39;t think of a time when I&amp;#39;ve cared about whether my Python dependencies were outdated, so long as they weren&amp;#39;t vulnerable or broken. By contrast, it appears to be somewhat common in the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48231877&quot; title=&quot;(I work on uv) As a note, you can set the default bounds for `uv add` in persistent configuration — no need to provide it every time. See https://docs.astral.sh/uv/reference/settings/#add-bounds We prefer not to add upper bounds by default because it causes a lot of unnecessary conflicts in the ecosystem. I previously collected some resources on this back when I used Poetry :) see https://github.com/zanieb/poetry-relax#references&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find the UX confusing compared to tools like `pnpm` or `poetry`, proponents highlight `uv`&amp;#39;s superior speed and its ability to resolve complex trees that other tools cannot &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48230163&quot; title=&quot;Interesting point of view and I think feedback is good. Although I agree with the overall sentiment of the article, I disagree with the intensity of the criticism. Having a command runner within your project will mask a lot of the issues the author mentioned. And although, in my experience, having a command runner for mid-sized projects and up is useful for many things, masking the UX issues means there&amp;#39;s a problem. I got on the uv bandwagon relatively recently as most of my work is maintaining…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48230380&quot; title=&quot;uv has a lot of great features, but the dependency resolution is why I&amp;#39;m a fanboy.  It can resolve trees that pip gives up on, and it does it 20x faster than poetry (100x faster than pip) - saves me half an hour on some big projects.  All the python resolution and environment management and stuff is just gravy.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics and developers also debated the merits of semver, noting that while it helps manage compatibility, Python&amp;#39;s inability to handle multiple versions of the same package in a single tree remains a fundamental constraint &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48230114&quot; title=&quot;The entire purpose of semver is to give you a way to resolve that conundrum. New major version = assume it&amp;#39;s incompatible. I mean, it may not actually work , but that&amp;#39;s what it&amp;#39;s for.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48230426&quot; title=&quot;The use or adherence to semver isn&amp;#39;t the problem here. As you say, if a package follows semver, it&amp;#39;s easy enough for the package managers to automatically update to newer compatible versions. The problem is when you want to have two different incompatible versions of the same package `foo` in the same program, because then you have to figure out what `import foo` means. You might say &amp;#39;just don&amp;#39;t do that&amp;#39;, but that package could be an indirect dependency of several of your direct dependencies.…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.niemanlab.org/2026/05/more-than-340-local-news-outlets-are-limiting-the-internet-archives-access-to-their-journalism/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;News outlets are limiting the Internet Archive’s access to their journalism&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (niemanlab.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225838&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;331 points · 123 comments · by jaredwiener&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over 340 local news outlets are now blocking the Internet Archive to prevent AI companies from scraping their journalism for training data. Major publishers like USA Today and Advance Local argue the restrictions protect intellectual property and maintain leverage for future AI licensing deals. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.niemanlab.org/2026/05/more-than-340-local-news-outlets-are-limiting-the-internet-archives-access-to-their-journalism/&quot; title=&quot;Title: More than 340 local news outlets are limiting the Internet Archive’s access to their journalism    URL Source: https://www.niemanlab.org/2026/05/more-than-340-local-news-outlets-are-limiting-the-internet-archives-access-to-their-journalism/    Published Time: Fri, 22 May 2026 05:09:50 GMT    Markdown Content:  May 20, 2026, 5:03 p.m.    McClatchy, Advance Local, Tribune Publishing and other major newspaper chains are restricting the nonprofit’s archiving bots.    In January, Nieman Lab [broke the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users express deep concern that blocking the Internet Archive will lead to a &amp;#34;memoryholed&amp;#34; future where historical records and dead websites are lost forever &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48227243&quot; title=&quot;Apologies for the self-promo. Downvote and I&amp;#39;ll know not to do it again. This trend of outright banning the Internet Archive has me extremely worried. I fear a future where news articles are memoryholed, and no one can remember exactly what was reported and how sensational it all seemed. I&amp;#39;ve been working on this project [0] for a while. Originally, I started with a tool that would allow people to snapshot webpages in their own browser, and they could selectively share their snapshots. Then by…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48227568&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s a real shame. I am involved with some history-related projects and the number of websites which go offline is huge, and the wayback machine is incredibly helpful for unearthing these dead sites. It is not hard to imagine a future in 50 years time where a huge percentage of this content is lost forever, or at best incredibly hard to find.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest a middle ground of delaying archive access by a week to protect immediate revenue &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48228983&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s an incredibly simple fix: block the archive for a week.  No one is paying after a week, so you let the Archive access after that. I don&amp;#39;t see why every news outlet doesn&amp;#39;t just do this.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48226823&quot; title=&quot;Maybe they should allow the Internet Archive access to their article after a week or 2. But I think this will hurt them as time goes on more then help.  IIRC, one news org blocked free access and their revenue fell.  I think that was in Australia. But seems they are using AI as the reason.  So allowing after a week will not avoid AI access. But, what happens of an AI Company subscribes to the news site using a person&amp;#39;s name (or a fake name) ?  They will still get the article and avoid hassles.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that the root issue is a shift toward prioritizing profit over the public service of journalism &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48228029&quot; title=&quot;Of course they are, because they are not primarily concerned with the reporting of noteworthy events.   They are most worried about profit with the secondary goal of reporting but only insofar as it serves the first goal. This is a wider trend across many industries. Obviously, a business needs to have an income but it&amp;#39;s becoming more common for businesses to function first and foremast as revenue generators and the thing that enables that is only seen as a means to an end.  When the quality of…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Proposed technical solutions range from micropayment systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48227077&quot; title=&quot;There really should be a micropayments setup on the internet that&amp;#39;s not advertising based. Let these models pay a nickel to read the article, covered by the multi trillion dollar AI blank check.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48227951&quot; title=&quot;Cloudflare is trying to push for that, but every time it&amp;#39;s mentioned people complain (because they hate Cloudflare for making them wait 2s for a captcha) and nobody proposes an alternative solution. I don&amp;#39;t think this is going to happen, unfortunately, and the internet will get silo-ed into oblivion.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;—which some dismiss as a &amp;#34;shit idea&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48228834&quot; title=&quot;People don&amp;#39;t hate micropayments because it&amp;#39;s Cloudflare promoting them, it&amp;#39;s because it truly is  a shit idea, for many reasons. People would equally reject Netflix, if Netflix fooated the idea of replacing the subscription model with pay-per-view micropayments. &amp;gt; ...nobody proposes an alternative solution Such is the human condition - some problems simply have no satisfactory solutions.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;—to decentralized, censorship-resistant tools that bypass copyright restrictions entirely &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48227243&quot; title=&quot;Apologies for the self-promo. Downvote and I&amp;#39;ll know not to do it again. This trend of outright banning the Internet Archive has me extremely worried. I fear a future where news articles are memoryholed, and no one can remember exactly what was reported and how sensational it all seemed. I&amp;#39;ve been working on this project [0] for a while. Originally, I started with a tool that would allow people to snapshot webpages in their own browser, and they could selectively share their snapshots. Then by…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48227536&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s definitely a copyright nightmare - so no clue how this could work. It could work as a decentralized free and open source system that doesn&amp;#39;t care about copyright. Like how torrents work now, but it would be good to have it work over Tor or something. Perhaps as a DAO for the management aspect of it. I don&amp;#39;t know how exactly. But disregarding copyright by using a centralized company is the wrong idea. Or you can do the lawful approach and try to work within the framework of that copyright…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/20/intuit-to-lay-off-over-3000-employees-to-refocus-on-ai/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Intuit to lay off over 3k employees to refocus on AI&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techcrunch.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48216278&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;253 points · 188 comments · by wapasta&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Intuit is laying off approximately 3,000 employees, or 17% of its workforce, to simplify its corporate structure and reallocate resources toward developing AI-driven products. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/20/intuit-to-lay-off-over-3000-employees-to-refocus-on-ai/&quot; title=&quot;Intuit to lay off over 3,000 employees to refocus on AI | TechCrunch    In a memo to employees, CEO Sasan Goodarzi said the layoffs are meant to reduce complexity, simplify the company&amp;#39;s corporate structure, and deliver better AI products.    [![](https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/tc-lockup.svg) TechCrunch Desktop Logo](https://techcrunch.com)    [![](https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/tc-logo-mobile.svg) TechCrunch Mobile Logo](https://techcrunch.com)    *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Intuit’s shift toward AI has sparked debate over whether the technology is suitable for the inherent non-determinism and complexity of tax law, which some argue functions more like a &amp;#34;leaky abstraction&amp;#34; or unoptimized code than a simple set of rules &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48216668&quot; title=&quot;The absolute last thing I want in the filing of my taxes is non-determinism.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48216758&quot; title=&quot;Boy, do I have bad news for you. Edit: To be clear, as a sibling post said, the basic arithmetic is easy enough. It&amp;#39;s the tax opinion stuff that is absolutely not deterministic. If your situation is even moderately complex, there&amp;#39;s a vast number of ways to describe your deductions, each with different tax implications and multi-year requirements. I&amp;#39;m not talking about being Jeff Bezos, either. Is your spouse an independent contractor? Do you own a home? Do you have stock options? Do you have a…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48217011&quot; title=&quot;It sort of is, except that the entire law isn&amp;#39;t defined in one place. &amp;#39;Hey, do I have a home office?&amp;#39; Well, &amp;#39;home&amp;#39; is defined over in this regulation, and &amp;#39;home office&amp;#39; is defined over there in that other regulation, and &amp;#39;having a home office&amp;#39; would normally mean this except for this case law that says it can also mean that when these other circumstances apply, and... These things are knowable, but unless you&amp;#39;ve spent some time studying it intensely, it&amp;#39;s certain that you only know a fraction…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find AI helpful for &amp;#34;what if&amp;#34; scenarios, others remain skeptical of its accuracy and resent Intuit&amp;#39;s history of lobbying against simplified filing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48216993&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m a happy TurboTax customer for over 25 years.  The standard workflow of TurboTax hasn&amp;#39;t changed much.  You go through a work flow filling out forms.  I don&amp;#39;t use any of the OCR and little of the importing.  I&amp;#39;m happy to type in numbers from forms myself. So normally I wouldn&amp;#39;t have any use for AI, but they added it anyway. This year I asked it a couple of &amp;#39;Why&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;What If&amp;#39; questions, and it was actually useful. If it stays at arm&amp;#39;s length, and if it can &amp;#39;read only&amp;#39;, then I am OK with it…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48218778&quot; title=&quot;Finally being able to stop paying Intuit $150 every year as a reward for their lobbying against tax code simplification and free e-file is one of the most exciting possibilities for AI imo&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48216950&quot; title=&quot;I think it&amp;#39;s a very common misconception among programmers that the law is a sort of natural language &amp;#39;program&amp;#39; where you can consistently deduce that x input generate y output.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, there is confusion regarding the layoffs, as the CEO has publicly denied they were AI-driven despite media framing, while some long-term customers are already abandoning the platform due to restrictive technical requirements &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48216747&quot; title=&quot;Why are other outlets quoting the CEO as having said that the layoffs have &amp;#39;nothing to do with AI&amp;#39;? Is TC  distinguishing between using AI versus building AI products? &amp;gt; &amp;#39;None of it had to do with AI,&amp;#39; Goodarzi told CNBC&amp;#39;s Jim Cramer on &amp;#39;Mad Money.&amp;#39; &amp;#39;Everything was about how do we become more effective.&amp;#39; https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/20/intuit-ceo-says-companys-17p...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48217594&quot; title=&quot;I WAS a happy TurboTax customer for over 33 years, until this year when I used HR Block TaxCut to file my 2025 returns.  Intuit insisted that only Windows 11 would be supported, for no technical reason whatsoever.  I assume they got a payoff from Microsoft for doing this. So now I see they&amp;#39;re laying off 3000 employees and wonder if it has something to do with poor sales of TurboTax because of their lame policy.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-20</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-20</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openai.com/index/model-disproves-discrete-geometry-conjecture/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in discrete geometry&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (openai.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48212493&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1421 points&lt;/strong&gt; · &lt;strong&gt;1047 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by tedsanders&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An OpenAI model has successfully disproved a central conjecture in discrete geometry, marking a significant milestone in the application of artificial intelligence to complex mathematical problem-solving. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openai.com/index/model-disproves-discrete-geometry-conjecture/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;x.com&amp;amp;#x2F;wtgowers&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2057175727271800912&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;x.com&amp;amp;#x2F;wtgowers&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2057175727271800912&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;wtgowers&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2057175727271800912&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;wtgowers&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2057175727271800912&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The successful disproof of a discrete geometry conjecture has sparked debate over whether LLMs are merely &amp;#34;recombining&amp;#34; training data or performing genuine discovery, with some arguing that even human mathematical breakthroughs often involve unfolding truths already implicit in existing axioms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48213071&quot; title=&quot;To the “LLMs just interpolate their training data” crowd: Ayer, and in a different way early Wittgenstein, held that mathematical truths don’t report new facts about the world. Proofs unfold what is already implicit in axioms, definitions, symbols, and rules. I think that idea is deeply fascinating, AND have no problem that we still credit mathematicians with discoveries. So either “recombining existing material” isn’t disqualifying, or a lot of Fields Medals need to be returned.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48212866&quot; title=&quot;As I have stated before, AI will win a fields medal before it can manage a McDonald&amp;#39;s A difficult part was constructing a chess board on which to play math (Lean). Now it&amp;#39;s just pattern recognition and computation. LLMs are just the beginning, we&amp;#39;ll see more specialized math AI resembling StockFish soon.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some mathematicians are optimistic that these tools can help manage the &amp;#34;exploding complexity barrier&amp;#34; of modern research &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214064&quot; title=&quot;Speaking as a postdoc in math, I must say that this is rather exciting. This is outside of my field, but the companion remarks document is quite digestible. It appears as though the proof here fairly inspired by results in literature, but the tweaks are non-trivial. Or, at least to me, they appear to be substantial to where I would consider the entire publication novel and exciting. Many of my colleagues and I have been experimenting with LLMs in our research process. I&amp;#39;ve had pretty great…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that LLMs remain &amp;#34;permutation machines&amp;#34; incapable of the artistic &amp;#34;creation&amp;#34; required for paradigm-shifting leaps like calculus &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48213168&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I think that idea is deeply fascinating, AND have no problem that we still credit mathematicians with discoveries. Most discoveries are indeed implied from axioms, but every now and then, new mathematics is (for lack of a better word) &amp;#39;created&amp;#39;—and you have people like Descartes, Newton, Leibniz, Gauss, Euler, Ramanujan, Galois, etc. that treat math more like an art than a science. For example, many belive that to sovle the Riemann Hypothesis, we likely need some new kind of math. Imo, it&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48213987&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d hope most functional adults understand that the Fields Medal and basically every other annual &amp;#39;prize&amp;#39; out there is awarded to both &amp;#39;recombinant&amp;#39; innovations and &amp;#39;new-dimensional thinking&amp;#39; innovations. Humans aren&amp;#39;t going to come up with &amp;#39;new-dimensional&amp;#39; innovations in every field, every single year. I&amp;#39;d say yes, LLMs &amp;#39;just&amp;#39; recombine things. I still don&amp;#39;t think if you trained an LLM with every pre-Newton/Liebniz algebra/geometry/trig text available, it could create calculus. (I&amp;#39;m open to…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48213404&quot; title=&quot;Because by definition LLMs are permutation machines, not creativity machines. (My premise, which you may disagree with, is that creativity/imagination/artistry is not merely permutation.)&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics also point out that as AI achieves &amp;#34;PhD-level&amp;#34; milestones, skeptics frequently move the goalposts to demand genius-level innovation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214465&quot; title=&quot;I like how everyone laughed when OpenAI said their models will have &amp;#39;PhD-Level Intelligence&amp;#39; and now the goalpost has been moved to if AI can create new math (i.e., not PhD-Level, but Leibniz/Euler/Galois level.)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, while some professionals express concern that such progress may eventually render lifelong human expertise obsolete &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48215122&quot; title=&quot;Why would it excite you, rather than terrifying you? The better LLMs get at math, the closer the expertise you spent your whole life building is to being worthless. Along with all the rest of what humans find meaningful and fulfilling.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lesnumeriques.com/banque-en-ligne/adieu-visa-et-mastercard-130-millions-d-europeens-basculent-vers-un-paiement-100-souverain-des-2026-n250918.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Goodbye Visa and Mastercard: 130M Europeans switching to sovereign payment&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lesnumeriques.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48207004&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;957 points · 771 comments · by healsdata&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Five major European mobile payment providers, including France&amp;#39;s Wero and Spain&amp;#39;s Bizum, are uniting to launch an independent, interoperable payment network for 130 million users starting in 2026 to challenge the dominance of Visa and Mastercard. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lesnumeriques.com/banque-en-ligne/adieu-visa-et-mastercard-130-millions-d-europeens-basculent-vers-un-paiement-100-souverain-des-2026-n250918.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Adieu Visa et Mastercard : 130 millions d&amp;#39;Européens basculent vers un paiement 100 % souverain dès 2026    URL Source: https://www.lesnumeriques.com/banque-en-ligne/adieu-visa-et-mastercard-130-millions-d-europeens-basculent-vers-un-paiement-100-souverain-des-2026-n250918.html    Published Time: 2026-05-15T19:35:00+02:00    Markdown Content:  # Adieu Visa et Mastercard : 130 millions d&amp;#39;Européens basculent vers un paiement 100 % souverain dès 2026 - Les Numériques    Continuer sans accepter…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users generally praise the shift toward sovereign payment systems like Wero and iDEAL for improving security by eliminating the need to share sensitive card data with merchants &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48207532&quot; title=&quot;Wero is basically an EU-wide version of the Dutch iDeal system, which in my opinion is the gold standard of how internet payment should work. I shouldn&amp;#39;t have to fill in any card numbers on the site of the merchant (which is unsafe). Instead, the payment should redirect me to my bank, where I authorize the payment through my own bank&amp;#39;s security system. I&amp;#39;ve always been annoyed by the need to type in sensitive card info on all sorts of merchant sites. I hope that with EU-wide use, Wero will…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that government-backed systems like Brazil’s PIX offer superior functionality and national autonomy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48207632&quot; title=&quot;PIX from Brazil is even better, to be honest. But this is a big improvement over online CC payment. I lived in the NL and Brazil, so I can compare the two, and while iDEAL is pretty good, PIX is easier to understand, explain, and deal with. PIX has more variants, you can use it for recurrent payment, split payments, financing, cashout and almost all things a CC can do nowadays. I would say Tikkie is almost as good and easy to use as PIX usecase wise but has less adoption and variants, also it…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48207751&quot; title=&quot;PIX is also better because it gives control back to the central bank (as it was with cash) and not private industry although they are providing the service. The central bank controls what payments are permitted by what laws exist, not some risk management system that has decided that your legal purchase is too risky or some foreign state has applied sanctions against you.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48207725&quot; title=&quot;Love to see it. When Canada legalized weed in 2018, the US administration made it clear that they can ban Canadians from the US for life if they have used marijuana in the past.  The administration alluded to looking at Canadian&amp;#39;s transaction history to facilitate cracking down on this more harshly[1]. It was so clear at that point to me how badly sovereign payments and banking is so needed. FATCA is a thing, I get it, I get the motivation- but allow another country to wield a &amp;#39;cooperation&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others warn that these platforms lack the robust consumer fraud protections and chargeback mechanisms provided by Visa and Mastercard &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48208456&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; PIX from Brazil is even better, to be honest. You lack the inherent fraud, bankruptcy and other malicious actor protection that Visa/Mastercard provides. Bought something online and didn&amp;#39;t receive your product? With PIX you&amp;#39;re SOL, with Visa/Mastercard you get a chargeback.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant skepticism regarding the fragmented nature of European apps and the slow timeline for commercial adoption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48207417&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; A Frenchman using Wero will be able to transfer money to a Spanish friend on Bizum, with the same simplicity as a domestic payment. Have you seen the new money app?  It&amp;#39;s on Tubu.  It&amp;#39;s on Weeno.  I&amp;#39;m on Dippy but my friend is on Poob.  Poob has it for you.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48207339&quot; title=&quot;Banks in Spain, Italy and Portugal are joining what this article describes as France’s Wero system [1]. («L&amp;#39;initiative française Wero».) Focus this year is on P2P transfers. Commerce is targeted for 2027. Given EuroPA has done a token amount of transactions to date, I’m not sure anyone should hold their breaths. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wero_(payment)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, alongside a debate over whether central bank control represents a democratic safeguard or a move toward authoritarianism &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48207774&quot; title=&quot;That sounds a little authoritarian for many Western countries, I imagine.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48208079&quot; title=&quot;I trust my government (Switzerland) way more to do the thing that is right for the people and the law then some private company that has the primary goal of making money. It doesn&amp;#39;t mean that governments don&amp;#39;t make mistakes but the primary goal is to serve its people. That is what government is for in a functioning democracy. A functioning government is of the people for the people.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.alqst.org/ar/posts/1190&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (alqst.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48206768&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1077 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 471 comments · by giuliomagnifico&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Human rights organizations are condemning Meta for geo-blocking the Facebook and Instagram accounts of NGOs and activists in Saudi Arabia and the UAE following government requests to restrict content under local cybercrime laws. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.alqst.org/ar/posts/1190&quot; title=&quot;Title: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia and the UAE    URL Source: https://www.alqst.org/ar/posts/1190    Published Time: 2026-05-20 13:26:24    Markdown Content:  The undersigned organisations condemn Meta’s recent decision to[restrict](https://transparency.meta.com/reports/content-restrictions/case-studies/)the Facebook and Instagram accounts of independent NGOs, researchers, and civil society figures from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia and the United…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a tension between social media&amp;#39;s original promise to spread democracy and its current role as a tool for state-level censorship and propaganda &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48208626&quot; title=&quot;Remember when they told us that social media would &amp;#39;spread democracy&amp;#39; ?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48208466&quot; title=&quot;I’m taking it as a given that any sufficiently large social network is a gigantic propaganda machine of interest to domestic and foreign nation-state actors. Entertaining the thought experiment where all the normies join the fediverse: now you’ve got a big juicy target maintained by hobbyists. When it’s Lazarus Group vs Randall, the over-worked sys admin who stood up a node in his spare time, who do you think wins? Social networks are cancer. Just ban the lot of them and move on.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that platforms are forced to comply with local laws to avoid being banned entirely &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48207603&quot; title=&quot;This is the exact opposite of what you think. The problem is the governments in those places, and not the private company. The private company would gladly connect everyone.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48209444&quot; title=&quot;Do they have a choice? It’s either that or they are shown the door, in which case they will probably be replaced by worse local alternatives in terms of freedom of speech and gov influence&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the &amp;#34;privatized profits, socialized harm&amp;#34; model incentivizes companies to prioritize revenue over human rights &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48207311&quot; title=&quot;Social media companies post record earnings year after year from their ads business while increasingly proving to be harmful to society. They do the bare minimum in terms of content moderation and bots while priming the algorithms to maximize revenue. The good ol&amp;#39; privatized profits, socialized harm model. In a just world, would social media platforms be taxed higher on corporate revenue and how would that pan out? Maybe we&amp;#39;ll be left with small federated platforms without algorithms and ads.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48211715&quot; title=&quot;At some point societies are going to have to reckon with the fact that democracy, free speech, and unrestricted capitalism simply aren&amp;#39;t a sustainable mix.  A system that allows people to amass incredible fortunes and use those fortunes to influence other people&amp;#39;s beliefs and votes is simply a system that will eventually fall under the control of those ultrawealthy people.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Users are increasingly skeptical of large-scale networks, though they struggle to find viable alternatives that balance community connection with protection against state influence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48207272&quot; title=&quot;Do folks have a suggestion for a Facebook alternative? I&amp;#39;m about fed up with the state of things, but still want to feel connected to social circles (even if they&amp;#39;re online only) and politics (ideally without the hate spam bots).&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48211740&quot; title=&quot;What’s your more effective, less flawed alternative with a proven track record?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/github-confirms-breach-of-3-800-repos-via-malicious-vscode-extension/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GitHub confirms breach of 3,800 repos via malicious VSCode extension&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bleepingcomputer.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48207660&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1052 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 457 comments · by Timofeibu&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GitHub confirmed that a malicious Visual Studio Code extension was used to gain unauthorized access to approximately 3,800 internal repositories. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/github-confirms-breach-of-3-800-repos-via-malicious-vscode-extension/&quot; title=&quot;Previous thread in sequence:&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;GitHub is investigating unauthorized access to their internal repositories&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=48201316&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=48201316&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt; - May 2026 (321 comments)&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The breach highlights a critical vulnerability in VS Code&amp;#39;s extension ecosystem, where a lack of explicit permissions allows malicious plugins to silently exfiltrate private keys and tokens &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214976&quot; title=&quot;Vs code extensions have been terrifying for a long time. Such a wild and obvious attack vector. I&amp;#39;m constantly getting pop ups in vscode to install an extension because it recognizes a certain file type. It&amp;#39;s 50-50 whether that extension is owned by a company or some random dev.  Some of these have millions of installs and on first glance appear to be official company owned extensions.  I&amp;#39;m at a point in my life where I only installed official company owned extensions and even that is hard to…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48213484&quot; title=&quot;I really hope this pushes Microsoft to add a explicit permission system to VS Code extensions, and improve security of dev containers.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48204905&quot; title=&quot;The 3800 repos weren&amp;#39;t exfiltrated from the compromised machine. The malware (be it a VSCode plugin, an npm package, or whatever is next) simply slurps up all of the users private keys/tokens/env-vars it can find and sends this off somewhere covertly. It&amp;#39;s trivial to do this in a way to avoid detection. The small payload can be encrypted (so it can&amp;#39;t be pattern matched) and then the destination can be one of millions of already compromised websites found via a google search and made to look…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters expressed frustration that Microsoft, which owns VS Code, NPM, and GitHub, has yet to implement a unified solution to secure these obvious attack vectors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214112&quot; title=&quot;If only the company behind VSCode, the company behind NPM and the company behind GitHub could get together and figure out a solution to this.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48213484&quot; title=&quot;I really hope this pushes Microsoft to add a explicit permission system to VS Code extensions, and improve security of dev containers.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest migrating away from VS Code or implementing strict internal pre-approval for all software, others argue that preventing exfiltration is nearly impossible once a developer machine is compromised &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48215732&quot; title=&quot;The problem extends far beyond VS code. All extensions and executable code has the same problem. There was a case where Disney was hacked because an employee installed a BeamNG mod that had bundled malware. A company that wants to remain secure would have to employ strict restrictions on installing software. Only installing npm packages and plugins from an internal preapproved repo for example.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214994&quot; title=&quot;I really hope this pushes users (here: devs and maintainers) to decrease their reliance on Microsoft and especially stop outsourcing security to them. Migrate off vscode already.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48204905&quot; title=&quot;The 3800 repos weren&amp;#39;t exfiltrated from the compromised machine. The malware (be it a VSCode plugin, an npm package, or whatever is next) simply slurps up all of the users private keys/tokens/env-vars it can find and sends this off somewhere covertly. It&amp;#39;s trivial to do this in a way to avoid detection. The small payload can be encrypted (so it can&amp;#39;t be pattern matched) and then the destination can be one of millions of already compromised websites found via a google search and made to look…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.fire.org/news/victory-tennessee-man-jailed-37-days-trump-meme-wins-835000-settlement-after-first-amendment&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tennessee man jailed 37 days for Trump meme wins settlement after lawsuit&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (fire.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48208502&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;767 points · 509 comments · by ceejayoz&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tennessee man Larry Bushart won an $835,000 settlement from Perry County after being jailed for 37 days for posting a Donald Trump meme on Facebook. Bushart’s federal lawsuit alleged that local officials retaliated against his protected speech by mischaracterizing the political meme as a threat. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.fire.org/news/victory-tennessee-man-jailed-37-days-trump-meme-wins-835000-settlement-after-first-amendment&quot; title=&quot;VICTORY! Tennessee man jailed 37 days for Trump meme wins $835,000 settlement after First Amendment lawsuit    Larry Bushart filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against Perry County for violating his constitutional rights in retaliation for his protected speech.    [Skip to main content](#maincontent)    * [Member Portal](https://www.thefire.org/members/)  * [Students](/students)  * [Faculty](/faculty)  * [Alumni](/alumni)  * [College Administrators](/college-administrators)  * [About Us](/about-us)    *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the lack of accountability for officials who abuse their power, with many arguing that law enforcement should face criminal charges or personal financial liability for wrongful arrests &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48209448&quot; title=&quot;The sheriff that arrested him should face criminal charges for misuse of authority. That he doesn&amp;#39;t reflects a structural weakness in US law. In most European legal systems a law enforcement officer overstepping his legal authority would face criminal charges for it.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48210587&quot; title=&quot;The fact that taxpayers and not the police themselves have to pay the settlement is the worst part of this. Every settlement against the police should be taken from their pension fund. This is something I&amp;#39;ve been advocating for decades now, because it creates an incentive not to do things like this. Right now, good cops don&amp;#39;t patrol bad cops because it won&amp;#39;t affect them. By aligning the incentives right, it will mean good cops will force out the bad cops quickly.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48209192&quot; title=&quot;We have overincarceration and underincarceration simultaneously. Some who are in jail should not be. Some who aren&amp;#39;t in jail should be. If I locked you up for a month over a meme, I&amp;#39;d go to jail for years.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest that settlements should be paid from police pensions to create internal incentives for reform, others contend that taxpayers should remain responsible to encourage voters to take government oversight more seriously &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48210587&quot; title=&quot;The fact that taxpayers and not the police themselves have to pay the settlement is the worst part of this. Every settlement against the police should be taken from their pension fund. This is something I&amp;#39;ve been advocating for decades now, because it creates an incentive not to do things like this. Right now, good cops don&amp;#39;t patrol bad cops because it won&amp;#39;t affect them. By aligning the incentives right, it will mean good cops will force out the bad cops quickly.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48209826&quot; title=&quot;I’ll cut against the grain here and say it’s ABSOLUTELY appropriate for taxpayers to pay the bill here. It’s pretty toxic that people don’t want to take responsibility for their own government in a democracy. In this case, it’s especially bad, given the sheriff is elected by the people directly. But I’d go even further and say even where control is less direct, we need incentives for voters to take this stuff seriously.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a sharp disagreement over whether further incarceration is the solution, with some warning that criminalizing police errors risks an escalating cycle of political retaliation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48209177&quot; title=&quot;The path to solving a culture that overincarcerates is not by incarcerating those involved in perpetuating that culture. We need to tame the impulse to throw people in jail for doing things we dislike, not just point it at different targets. I see several comments saying that criminal charges should be brought over this. That is not the way.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48209384&quot; title=&quot;The system needs to change so pursuing frivolous or weak charges doesn&amp;#39;t work. We also need to reform bail, which has gone way outside of historical/constitutional norms. Turning it into an escalating back and forth of each side trying to imprison the other, is not conducive to the kind of change we need. To take a recent example, while I don&amp;#39;t particularly like James Comey or Letitia James, I don&amp;#39;t think they should have been targeted. That kind of stuff is what happens when it escalates to…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.habets.se/2026/05/Everything-in-C-is-undefined-behavior.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Everything in C is undefined behavior&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.habets.se)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48203698&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;504 points · &lt;strong&gt;713 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by lycopodiopsida&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that writing correct C or C++ is nearly impossible due to pervasive and subtle undefined behavior, suggesting that developers should use LLMs to identify these hidden risks in legacy codebases. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.habets.se/2026/05/Everything-in-C-is-undefined-behavior.html&quot; title=&quot;Everything in C is undefined behavior    If he had been a programmer, Cardinal Richelieu would have said “Give me six lines written by the hand of the most expert C programmer in the world, and I wi...    [Blargh](https://blog.habets.se/)    [Categories](https://blog.habets.se/categories.html)  [About](https://blog.habets.se/about/)    [Livecount](https://github.com/ThomasHabets/livecount): connecting…    This is my personal blog. The views expressed on these pages are mine alone and not those of my…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the premise that Undefined Behavior (UB) is so pervasive in C that writing non-trivial, standards-compliant code is nearly impossible for humans &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48205770&quot; title=&quot;Author here. &amp;gt; It barely scratches the surface. I agree. The point of the post is not to enumerate and explain the implications of all 283 uses of the word &amp;#39;undefined&amp;#39; in the standard. Nor enumerate all the things that are undefined by omission. The point of the post is to say it&amp;#39;s not possible to avoid them. Or at least, no human since the invention of C in 1972 has. And if it&amp;#39;s not succeeded for 54 years, &amp;#39;try harder&amp;#39;, or &amp;#39;just never make a mistake&amp;#39;, is at least not the solution. The (one!)…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48205867&quot; title=&quot;Fair enough! &amp;gt; And if it&amp;#39;s not succeeded for 54 years, &amp;#39;try harder&amp;#39;, or &amp;#39;just never make a mistake&amp;#39;, is at least not the solution. And I 100% agree. UB is way overused by these standards for how dangerous it is, and as a consequence using C (and C++) for anything nontrivial amounts to navigating a minefield.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that common practices like pointer casting are &amp;#34;clearly&amp;#34; dangerous &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48204853&quot; title=&quot;Which is totally fine and expected for any decent programmer. Casting pointers is clearly here be dragons territory.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that even seemingly benign code—such as reading a `volatile` variable twice in a `printf` call—can trigger UB due to unsequenced side effects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48204741&quot; title=&quot;Yes there is tons of surprising and weird UB in C, but this article doesn&amp;#39;t do a great job of showcasing it. It barely scratches the surface. Here&amp;#39;s a way weirder example: volatile int x = 5;    printf(&amp;#39;%d in hex is 0x%x.\n&amp;#39;, x, x); This is totally fine if x is just an int, but the volatile makes it UB. Why? 5.1.2.4.1 says any volatile access - including just reading it - is a side effect. 6.5.1.2 says that unsequenced side effects on the same scalar object (in this case, x) are UB. 6.5.3.3.8…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. A major point of contention is the disconnect between hardware and the C standard: many programmers mistakenly believe C is a &amp;#34;low-level&amp;#34; mirror of hardware, yet the language specification often forbids operations that modern CPUs handle without issue, such as unaligned pointer casts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48204681&quot; title=&quot;The UB in unaligned pointers is even worse: an unaligned pointer in itself is UB, not only an access to it.  So even implicit casting a void*v to an int*i (like &amp;#39;i=v&amp;#39; in C or &amp;#39;f(v)&amp;#39; when f() accepts an int*) is UB if the cast pointer is not aligned to int. It is important to understand that this is a C level problem: if you have UB in your C program, then your C program is broken, i.e., it is formally invalid and wrong, because it is against the C language spec.  UB is not on the HW, it has…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48204933&quot; title=&quot;Many, many programmers come to C (and C++) with a lower-level understanding that actually gets in the way here. They understand that all types &amp;#39;are&amp;#39; just bytes and that all pointers &amp;#39;are&amp;#39; just register-sized integer addresses, because that&amp;#39;s how the hardware works and has worked for decades. It&amp;#39;s perfectly reasonable to expect any load through `int*` to just load 4 bytes from memory, done and done. They get surprised that it is far from the whole story, and the result is UB. Meanwhile, the…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, while some view these &amp;#34;rough edges&amp;#34; as sensationalized &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48204287&quot; title=&quot;The examples aren&amp;#39;t really undefined behavior. They are examples that could become UB based on input/circumstances. Which if you are going to be that generous, every function call is UB because it could exceed stack space. Which is basically true in any language (up to the equivalent def of UB in that language). I feel like c has enough actual rough edges that deserve attention that sensationalism like this muddies folks attention (particularly novices) and can end up doing more harm than good.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that the flexibility of C is a &amp;#34;mine&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tante.cc/2026/05/20/on-google-declaring-war-on-the-web/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Google Declaring War on the Web&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tante.cc)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214449&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;633 points · 439 comments · by cdrnsf&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google is shifting its search paradigm toward AI-generated summaries that decontextualize information, a move critics argue monopolizes access to information and threatens the participatory web by reducing original content to unpaid raw material for synthetic responses. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tante.cc/2026/05/20/on-google-declaring-war-on-the-web/&quot; title=&quot;Title: On Google declaring war on the Web    URL Source: https://tante.cc/2026/05/20/on-google-declaring-war-on-the-web/    Published Time: 2026-05-20T08:44:49+00:00    Markdown Content:  In Yesterday’s IO Keynote Google declared war on the remnants of the Web. (See [longer description](https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/products/search/search-io-2026/#personal-intelligence) on their website.) TL;DR: They are pushing Search more into the “here’s your processed answer” direction that “AI…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of generative AI is creating a cultural schism between those who value rapid, corporate-led innovation and those who prefer artisanal, sustainable, and human-centric work &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48215687&quot; title=&quot;As someone who simultaneously makes music professionally, and works in IT professionally, it has been really interesting watching GenAI unfold, and the diverging cultures around it. It is almost like the world is splitting into two &amp;#39;societies&amp;#39;: 1. One that loves AI + Big Business + very fast Innovation and disruption 2. One that loves Artisanal work + Small Business + slower but more sustainable innovation I personally prefer living in #2, but I can totally see both &amp;#39;societies&amp;#39; continuing to…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48216249&quot; title=&quot;I make my own furniture. I am absolutely not a carpenter. But I hate Ikea furniture - it&amp;#39;s made of shitty, flimsy, materials, and its design priorities are all based on cost and ease of transport, not on being great furniture that will last years and be an actual asset to the home. This is an analogy, obviously. Ikea has been innovative, and it does provide a useful service for people; if you just moved into a new place and need to furnish it as quickly and cheaply as possible, then off to Ikea…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that AI makes original human art more precious &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48215512&quot; title=&quot;At least for art - I don&amp;#39;t think you&amp;#39;ll find anyone who actually enjoys art hanging up anything produced by AI on their walls. For these kinds of &amp;#39;customers&amp;#39;, they could equally easily frame &amp;amp; hang up a poster of the Mona Lisa. Artists are not at threat, if anything, AI makes original artworks more precious &amp;amp; enjoyable.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others fear it is &amp;#34;downskilling&amp;#34; the workforce as professionals replace thoughtful analysis with automated summaries &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48215153&quot; title=&quot;As a website owner I have seen major upticks in viewership myself but really it hits hard when you see an Ai summary that is wrong and your sites there. The whole Ai for everything push unfortunatly will downskill the world I fear and nothing can be done about it.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48215278&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; downskill the world I feel this. I asked a developer today a question about how our product is programmed to handle something, and he just sent me a summary from the internal AI assistant they&amp;#39;ve started using. He used to provide really good, thoughtful answers, but now it&amp;#39;s just copy/paste from the AI.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, there is growing concern that Google is breaking its symbiotic relationship with the open web by scraping content to provide direct answers, effectively cutting off the traffic that incentivizes creators to publish &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48215154&quot; title=&quot;I feel like AI has gotten to the point where the message is:  If you want to make something (art/code/music/writing) you can do it for your own enjoyment, but you aren&amp;#39;t allowed to make money from it anymore;  only the large corporations can make money from content.  If you do release something creative, it&amp;#39;ll just be fed back into the machine to be copied over and over.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48215146&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand the endgame here. Websites let Google crawl their content in exchange of traffic. If Google cuts that out completely, what incentive do websites have to not block the Google crawlers? I understand that Google is feeling an existential threat from other AI products that provide answers directly. But they must also understand their symbiotic relationship with the web.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214874&quot; title=&quot;We abrogated getting traffic to our websites to Google long ago. Mostly because Google was so good at it that the alternatives became significantly less useful. Now that Google is focusing on becoming &amp;#39;self contained&amp;#39;, so to speak, we should find a better way to drive traffic to websites. Ideally one that&amp;#39;s not under the control of a single corporation. Anyone miss StumbleUpon?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.7&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Qwen3.7-Max: The Agent Frontier&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (qwen.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48205626&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;718 points · 292 comments · by kevinsimper&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alibaba Cloud has introduced Qwen3.7-Max, a proprietary model optimized for autonomous agents, featuring advanced coding, office automation, and long-horizon reasoning capabilities. It demonstrates significant performance gains in complex tasks, such as a 35-hour autonomous kernel optimization and high-revenue startup management simulations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.7&quot; title=&quot;Title: Qwen3.7: The Agent Frontier    URL Source: https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.7    Published Time: 2026-05-16T10:00:00+08:00    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: Qwen3.7 Main Image](https://qianwen-res.oss-cn-beijing.aliyuncs.com/Qwen3.7/Figures/qwen3.7-max-banner.png)  [DISCORD](https://discord.gg/yPEP2vHTu4)    Today we introduce **Qwen3.7-Max**, our latest proprietary model designed for the agent era. Qwen3.7-Max is built to be a versatile agent foundation — equally capable of writing and debugging…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are increasingly adopting Qwen models as high-quality, free alternatives to proprietary tools like Claude Code for smaller tasks, though performance varies significantly based on hardware configurations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48209290&quot; title=&quot;I was getting dangerously close to my weekly Claude Code limit last night so I had Claude set up Qwen3.6 with llama.cpp and OpenCode. Honestly it&amp;#39;s a great (free!) alternative to Claude Code--certainly more than good enough for a lot of smaller less complex tasks. I&amp;#39;m excited to try this new version. The fact that open-source models are so close to the frontier is very impressive.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48210951&quot; title=&quot;Out of interest, what machine and model are you running it on? I tried the qwen3.6-27b Q6_k GUFF in llama.cpp and LM Studio on my M2 MacBook Pro 32GB machine last week, and I barely get a token a second with either. What sort of speed should I be expecting? I tried some of the Llama 3 34b (nous-capybara?) models two years ago with llama.cpp, and I seem to remember getting a few tokens a second then, so not sure if I&amp;#39;ve got something completely mis-configured, or I just have unreasonable…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some express a desire for Qwen models to be hosted on US-domiciled hyperscalers to facilitate production use, others argue that using foreign models provides a privacy advantage by keeping data away from one&amp;#39;s own government &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48206924&quot; title=&quot;As they start to release more proprietary models, I so wish that they partnered with one of the major US hyperscalers to allow using these models through something US-domiciled. Totally understand why it may not be reasonable or in their best interest (and that the US is _absolutely_ not doing the same reflexively). But it would be lovely to be able to try these out on production workloads in earnest.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48207171&quot; title=&quot;I do hope  The U.S. hyperscalers do the same as well. In an ideal world U.S. residents would use Chinese AI models and Chinese residents would use U.S. AI models. Governments in both countries are collecting data for nefarious reasons. But the Chinese government has far less influence on a U.S. resident and vice versa. We are all better off if our data is collected by a government halfway across the world instead of our own governments which hold incredible amounts of power over us.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. However, significant skepticism remains regarding corporate espionage and the security of using Chinese-developed models on sensitive proprietary codebases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48207467&quot; title=&quot;It would have been the world we live in if China wasn&amp;#39;t involved in so much corporate espionage. I don&amp;#39;t even feel comfortable using their open weight models on anything my employer makes, the only time I use Qwen is for greenfield &amp;#39;how good is this?&amp;#39; type of projects, but otherwise, how do I trust that it wont mysteriously hallucinate phoning home? On the other hand, there&amp;#39;s other models where the source is 100% open, the training data is known, and people have reproduced the same model from…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/github/status/2056884788179726685&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GitHub is investigating unauthorized access to their internal repositories&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48201316&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;632 points · 338 comments · by splenditer&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GitHub is investigating a security incident involving unauthorized access to several of its internal code repositories. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/github/status/2056884788179726685&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;github&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2056884788179726685&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;github&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2056884788179726685&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights significant concern over GitHub&amp;#39;s decision to announce a major security breach—involving the exfiltration of approximately 3,800 internal repositories—exclusively on X/Twitter rather than official status pages &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48202206&quot; title=&quot;Is Twitter/X the right channel to announce a security event like this? I ask because I don’t see anything posted on their official blog or status page. https://github.blog/ https://www.githubstatus.com/&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48201797&quot; title=&quot;The security issue aside, seeing more companies push announcements like these on X as the only official source is a trend I&amp;#39;m not sure I like. I can understand the rationale, this feels lighter and not something that belongs on status.github.com or the blog. Maybe what&amp;#39;s actually missing is an official channel for ephemeral stuff on a domain they own, somewhere between a status page and a tweet? Just sharing an observation.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48203099&quot; title=&quot;GitHub: &amp;#39; Our current assessment is that the activity involved exfiltration of GitHub-internal repositories only. The attacker’s current claims of ~3,800 repositories are directionally consistent with our investigation so far.&amp;#39; Oof https://xcancel.com/github/status/2056949169701720157&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Users questioned the security architecture that allowed a single developer account such broad access &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48203199&quot; title=&quot;Why did one developer have access, even if read-only, to more than 3,800 internal repos?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, while others debated whether the rise in such incidents is linked to more capable AI models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48201518&quot; title=&quot;Is it just me or is this happening way more frequently in the last 4 or 5 months? Coincidently around the same time the models got a lot more capable?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. To mitigate risks from extensions and supply chain attacks, commenters suggested using static analysis tools, sandboxing, or switching to alternative editors like Zed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48203926&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s the reason I stopped installing random extensions and even themes in VS Code, they are too dangerous.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48201562&quot; title=&quot;- Use Static analysis for GHA to catch security issues: https://github.com/zizmorcore/zizmor - set locally: pnpm config set minimum-release-age 4320 # 3 days in minutes https://pnpm.io/supply-chain-security for other package managers check: https://gist.github.com/mcollina/b294a6c39ee700d24073c0e5a4e... - add Socket Free Firewall when installing npm packages on CI https://docs.socket.dev/docs/socket-firewall-free#github-act...&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48204213&quot; title=&quot;How hard would it be to have one installation step to be to have Claude read through all the code to the extension and strip out anything that looks risky (ie. Calls out to external servers).? Do that automatically for all code downloaded from the web and run outside a sandbox. Maybe won&amp;#39;t catch everything, but should catch most evil stuff, especially if a variety of models and prompts are used.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48203995&quot; title=&quot;I just moved to Zed (zed.dev). Has everything I need&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://status.railway.com/incident/I23M92U0&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Incident Report: Railway Blocked by Google Cloud [resolved]&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (status.railway.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48201484&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;559 points · 357 comments · by aarondf&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Railway has resolved an incident where its services were blocked due to a Google Cloud Platform account suspension. &lt;a href=&quot;https://status.railway.com/incident/I23M92U0&quot; title=&quot;Subsequent thread: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Incident Report: May 19, 2026 – GCP Account Suspension&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=48204770&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=48204770&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The incident has reignited criticism of Google Cloud Platform’s (GCP) reputation for automated account terminations and poor human support, with users noting that competitors like AWS typically contact customers before taking drastic actions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48201884&quot; title=&quot;It has been 0 days since GCP has taken down a startup (again). You see this at least once a year. Never heard of this from AWS or Azure. In all seriousness, this is why we don&amp;#39;t use them. They have the most ergonomic cloud of the big three, then absolutely murder it by having this kind of reputation.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48202191&quot; title=&quot;How the heck do these things happen, especially with companies with huge monthly spend? At my last job we had some suspicious workloads running on AWS and our TAM reached out to us before taking any action. Who wants to bet this was some AI automation gone wrong and because GCP seems to be allergic to actually contacting a human to get a response, this just sits in some support queue that outsourced workers look at after a few hours just to give a canned response?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48201985&quot; title=&quot;AWS normally contacts you first.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue GCP experiences fewer catastrophic infrastructure outages than its rivals, others attribute this to a smaller market share or point to high-profile disasters like the UniSuper account deletion as evidence of systemic risks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48202303&quot; title=&quot;On the other hand i can’t remember when there was a serious outage on GCP, unlike AWS/Azure who seem to go down catastrophically a couple of times per year.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48202735&quot; title=&quot;Perhaps you don&amp;#39;t notice GCP outages because so few companies rely on them?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48202785&quot; title=&quot;May 2024 UniSuper incident: https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/infrastructure/detail... https://www.unisuper.com.au/about-us/media-centre/2024/a-joi... A joint statement from UniSuper CEO Peter Chun and Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian 8 May 2024 UniSuper and Google Cloud understand the disruption to services experienced by members has been extremely frustrating and disappointing. We extend our sincere apologies to all members. While supporting UniSuper to bring its systems back online,…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Meanwhile, some users expressed disappointment that Railway relies on a hyperscaler despite marketing itself as an alternative, while others questioned Railway&amp;#39;s own internal handling of the situation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48203310&quot; title=&quot;Everyone is eager to point a finger at Google, but I&amp;#39;ve been a user of Railway for a while now, and I&amp;#39;ve seen enough nonsense to want to hear what GCP has to say about this before drawing any conclusions. Let&amp;#39;s just say Railway has had problems like this before, and the way their team handles them does not inspire any confidence. Regardless of how it happened, for me, this is the straw that broke the camel&amp;#39;s back.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48201771&quot; title=&quot;Wait… railway runs on GCP? Didn’t they make a whole thing about not “building a cloud on top of another cloud?” Or did they just mean that they’re not renting VPSs but only metal from the cloud provider? In my mind I was so excited that there was another provider not just paying one of the hyperscalars but at a minimum colocating and owning more of their stack. https://blog.railway.com/p/heroku-walked-railway-run&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1181412/000162828026036936/spaceexplorationtechnologi.htm&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SpaceX S-1&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sec.gov)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48213933&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;453 points · 375 comments · by cachecow&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX) filed an S-1 registration statement with the SEC on May 20, 2026, for an initial public offering of its Class A common stock, seeking to list on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol &amp;#34;SPCX&amp;#34; while maintaining Elon Musk&amp;#39;s majority voting control. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1181412/000162828026036936/spaceexplorationtechnologi.htm&quot; title=&quot;Title: Space Exploration Technologies - S-1    URL Source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1181412/000162828026036936/spaceexplorationtechnologi.htm    Published Time: Wed, 20 May 2026 20:43:18 GMT    Markdown Content:  S-1 1 spaceexplorationtechnologi.htm S-1  As filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on May 20, 2026  Registration No. 333-                    UNITED STATES  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION  WASHINGTON, DC 20549      FORM S-1  REGISTRATION STATEMENT  UNDER THE SECURITIES…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SpaceX S-1 filing reveals that the company&amp;#39;s largest revenue stream is now a $1.25 billion monthly cloud services agreement with Anthropic, totaling $45 billion over three years &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214494&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;in May 2026, we entered into Cloud Services Agreements with Anthropic PBC (“Anthropic”), an AI research and development public benefit corporation, with respect to access to compute capacity across COLOSSUS and COLOSSUS II. Pursuant to these agreements, the customer has agreed to pay us $1.25 billion per month through May 2029, with capacity ramping in May and June 2026 at a reduced fee&amp;#39; Anthropic is paying them 1.25 billion per month to serve Claude in their data centers. That&amp;#39;s more revenue…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214591&quot; title=&quot;$45 billion for a 3 year rental .&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While Starlink is a significant &amp;#34;cash machine&amp;#34; with $11.4 billion in revenue, the overall financials show heavy losses and high capital expenditure, leading to debate over whether the company&amp;#39;s valuation is driven by fundamentals or &amp;#34;hype and momentum&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214062&quot; title=&quot;Crazy this company will IPO for &amp;gt;1B with such bad financials! That said, Starlink seems to be a real cash machine, not as good as ads but enough to support AI bets. 2025: - Revenue: $18.7B, up from $14.0B in 2024 - Operating loss: -$2.6B - Net loss: -$4.9B - Adjusted EBITDA: $6.6B - Operating cash flow: $6.8B - Capex: $20.7B Segment breakdown: - Starlink / Connectivity: $11.4B revenue, $4.4B operating income, $7.2B adj. EBITDA - Space / launch: $4.1B revenue, -$657M operating loss - AI / xAI /…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214922&quot; title=&quot;SpaceX is incredibly exciting, but I was skeptical when XAI and Twitter were rolled into it.  The S-1 here makes it even more disappointing. I did want a piece of SpaceX but the valuation here is pretty eye watering compared to the fundamentals.  I don&amp;#39;t think I can put my money into this, although I suspect it will still do gangbusters based on hype and momentum. Its also a real shame that SpaceX&amp;#39;s competitors have not been able to get the same level of momentum.  I know Starship has been…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Commentators are particularly divided on the integration of xAI and Twitter/X into the business, with some viewing the circular AI spending as a &amp;#34;fugazzi&amp;#34; and others noting the impressive scale of the Colossus data centers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214130&quot; title=&quot;Finally ! Can we end the debate about how mind blowingly profitable this company is ? Mind you, those numbers don&amp;#39;t take into account YET the Twitter debt / xAI merger burden - which will run into tens of billions per year. I just can&amp;#39;t, can&amp;#39;t wait until this whole Musk fugazzi finally blows up.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48216222&quot; title=&quot;As far as I can Google the colossus data centers did cost about 7-10 and 18 B respectively. Renting them out in part at 1.25 B pr month sounds like a very good deal for spacex.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48216332&quot; title=&quot;The whole AI world really is completely circular spending where every one loses money along the way. The only one really making any money is Nvidia.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/college-students-drown-out-ai-praising-commencement-speeches-with-boos-deal-with-it-one-speaker-fires-back-as-students-heckle-positive-pitches-for-ais-role&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;College students drown out AI-praising commencement speeches with boos&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tomshardware.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48206241&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;378 points · 386 comments · by iancmceachern&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;College students at several U.S. universities booed commencement speakers for praising AI, reflecting deep anxieties about the technology&amp;#39;s impact on the job market for new graduates. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/college-students-drown-out-ai-praising-commencement-speeches-with-boos-deal-with-it-one-speaker-fires-back-as-students-heckle-positive-pitches-for-ais-role&quot; title=&quot;College students drown out AI-praising commencement speeches with boos — &amp;#39;deal with it&amp;#39; one speaker fires back as students heckle positive pitches for AI&amp;#39;s role    Arizona students reject ex-Google exec&amp;#39;s positive words on AI    ![](https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p/?c1=2&amp;amp;c2=10055482&amp;amp;cv=4.4.0&amp;amp;cj=1)    [Skip to main content](#main)    Unlock world-class roadmaps &amp;amp; trusted Bench data.  See More    ×    ## Unparalleled insights. Industry analysis. Insider access.    **Tom&amp;#39;s Hardware** Premium equips you with…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The backlash against AI-focused commencement speeches was driven by a perceived lack of empathy and a condescending tone from speakers like Eric Schmidt, who told graduates to &amp;#34;deal with it&amp;#34; regarding AI&amp;#39;s disruption of their industries &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48206765&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Tennessee State University suggested AI was &amp;#39;rewriting production as we sit here&amp;#39; and told his audience to &amp;#39;deal with it&amp;#39; as they jeered him in response. Guess it doesn&amp;#39;t take much to see what&amp;#39;s under the mask.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48206856&quot; title=&quot;Eric Schmidt’s speech was particularly bad regardless of the subject, his condescending tone alone deserved the booing.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters argue that adapting to technological shifts is a historical necessity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48207035&quot; title=&quot;So what is he supposed to say? &amp;#39;Ok let&amp;#39;s stop developing AI so you can all have the exact job you trained for?&amp;#39; That hasn&amp;#39;t been the case for decades. When I left my eduction I could sequence 200 basepairs using gels. Now I process terabytes of NGS data on supercomputers. I dealt with it, I enjoyed it. Edit: Not saying these kids have nothing to rage against, they can&amp;#39;t afford houses, are uninsured, they face a huge wealth gap in the population, possible a war, the country is tearing apart...…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others highlight a generational divide where older executives push a technology that young adults are actively rejecting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48207910&quot; title=&quot;GenAI is the first technology that I&amp;#39;ve ever seen that is actively rejected by young adults and fervently pushed by people over 55. It seems Eric Schmids of the world think they (in their 70s) have more say about the future of these students than the students themselves. That is very unlikely.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond the technology itself, the protests were fueled by a refusal to accept &amp;#34;messages of despair&amp;#34; about the job market and personal controversies surrounding the speakers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48206895&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;After my speech for the troops about how we are losing in Iran, my speech to children with cancer about how we&amp;#39;ve gutted research, sure I can then give a speech to people entering the job market about how AI is ruining the job market&amp;#39; Perfect, that&amp;#39;s exactly the message of despair we want to send! (How I imagine picking these speakers goes at every college campus)&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48207366&quot; title=&quot;Not the only issue people have issues with: &amp;gt; Ritter filed a lawsuit in November that alleged Schmidt, a former chief executive and chairman of Google, “forcibly raped” her while on a yacht off the coast of Mexico in 2021. &amp;gt; She also claimed they had sex without her consent during the 2023 Burning Man festival in Nevada. ref: https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2026-03-06/former-goo...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/pokemoncentral/status/2057123807404638250&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apparently Google hates us now&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48210263&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;506 points · 252 comments · by zeitg3ist&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The provided link is inaccessible because the content failed to load due to disabled JavaScript or browser compatibility issues. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/pokemoncentral/status/2057123807404638250&quot; title=&quot;# JavaScript is not available.    We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using x.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.    [Help Center](https://help.x.com/using-x/x-supported-browsers)    [Terms of Service](https://x.com/tos)  [Privacy Policy](https://x.com/privacy)  [Cookie Policy](https://support.x.com/articles/20170514)  [Imprint](https://legal.twitter.com/imprint.html)  [Ads…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that Google has transitioned from a state-of-the-art tool to an indifferent conglomerate that prioritizes shareholder gains over search quality and user experience &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48212551&quot; title=&quot;Google does not hate us... it is worse than that - it is indifferent to us. Hate requires some sort of recognition. I mean this single incident may not mean anything but overall google is heading to an _interesting_ place. In short, it was state of the art but in 20 years it became just another conglomerate sacrificing quality for shareholder gain, I think? As a search engine, it does not work for me. I see promoted links above the thing I actually search for. Moved to Kagi and didn&amp;#39;t look…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Many believe Google no longer needs to direct traffic to external sites because it has already scraped their data to train AI models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48211122&quot; title=&quot;Why would Google need to direct traffic to the website when they&amp;#39;ve already scraped and trained their models on the data? Content creators and legitimate websites were wham-bammed and thank-you-ma’amed.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, while others suggest the platform&amp;#39;s decline is exacerbated by relentless wiki spammers and malware, which Google may be &amp;#34;legitimately&amp;#34; filtering out &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48210847&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;re a wiki.  Wiki spammers are relentless now. Source: a small wiki I help manage, for an obscure game with &amp;lt;10k players, recently had to disable new signups, because the spam was so bad (and it was stuck on an old version of MediaWiki, which didn&amp;#39;t have CAPTCHA-support). On a popular wiki, and it sounds like this one was fairly popular, I imagine even CAPTCHA&amp;#39;s won&amp;#39;t be enough to stop wiki spammers.  If those spammers were posting more than just &amp;#39;buy my penis pill&amp;#39; garbage (e.g. they were…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. This dissatisfaction has led users to migrate to alternatives like Kagi, iCloud, and even Yandex to find results that Google seemingly suppresses &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48212551&quot; title=&quot;Google does not hate us... it is worse than that - it is indifferent to us. Hate requires some sort of recognition. I mean this single incident may not mean anything but overall google is heading to an _interesting_ place. In short, it was state of the art but in 20 years it became just another conglomerate sacrificing quality for shareholder gain, I think? As a search engine, it does not work for me. I see promoted links above the thing I actually search for. Moved to Kagi and didn&amp;#39;t look…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48212827&quot; title=&quot;I feel like a crazy person, but I&amp;#39;ve been using Yandex as the last resort and having positive results in finding stuff that I know is out there but Google has decided to stop letting me see. (I tried DDG but for my use it&amp;#39;s been worse than Google).&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48213449&quot; title=&quot;Not crazy, I always resort to yandex when I know google is not showing me the results I am looking for DDG doesn’t click for me sadly, and I cannot point my finger to where or why&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Amidst this, a debate emerged comparing Google’s data scraping to the way ad-block users have historically denied creators revenue &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48211278&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;wham-bammed and thank-you-ma’amed. So same thing ad-block users have been doing for 20 years now? Edit: You can downvote, but you can&amp;#39;t tell me the difference, can you? Edit 2: Funny how when you call out ad block users for denying creators revenue, they go on about how the internet was fine in &amp;#39;96, how no one should expect anything for putting content online, or how it&amp;#39;s their computer so they can chose what loads on it. Where did those arguments go?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48212380&quot; title=&quot;Trust me, the downvotes were instant. People really hate it when you hold up a mirror to illustrate a problem. They tend to reflexively punch the mirror&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.railway.com/p/incident-report-may-19-2026-gcp-account-outage&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Incident Report: May 19, 2026 – GCP Account Suspension&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.railway.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48204770&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;454 points · 264 comments · by 0xedb&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Railway has published an incident report detailing a service outage caused by an unexpected Google Cloud Platform account suspension. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.railway.com/p/incident-report-may-19-2026-gcp-account-outage&quot; title=&quot;Previous thread: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Incident Report: Railway Blocked by Google Cloud [resolved]&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=48201484&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=48201484&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The consensus among commenters is that Google Cloud Platform (GCP) has become an unreliable B2B partner due to frequent, automated account suspensions and a history of abrupt service deprecations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48211323&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Finally, we are in planning to remove Google Cloud services from our data plane’s hot path, and keeping them only for secondary/failover.&amp;#39; That&amp;#39;s pretty clear. Google can no longer be trusted as a B2B service provider.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48211739&quot; title=&quot;This should be a warning to anyone running GCP. They suspend accounts left right and centre without even thinking about what they&amp;#39;re doing. It seems like they use Gemini 3.1 Pro to run their production decisions. TK has a history of absolutely destroying the culture of the place like in OCI and has done something similar in GCP from what I&amp;#39;ve heard. GCP and Google are completely different entities with how they work. Don&amp;#39;t expect Google quality from the name. It&amp;#39;s just like those old brands…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48212107&quot; title=&quot;The cloud provider in question - GCP - who also deleted a 125 billion dollar company&amp;#39;s entire account on accident?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users demand to know the specific root cause for the suspension, others argue that Google’s opaque &amp;#34;black box&amp;#34; enforcement often punishes businesses for unrelated personal account issues or &amp;#34;vibe coding&amp;#34; errors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48211589&quot; title=&quot;The interesting and yet-to-be-explained part is why google flagged the account? Put all the timestamps you want in the post mortem about what you observed, but you haven&amp;#39;t addressed the root cause. The &amp;#39;this doesn&amp;#39;t make sense&amp;#39; part of the story likely has a real explanation that nobody wants to reveal yet.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48211835&quot; title=&quot;They have not explained WHY their account was suspended. That&amp;#39;s the most important part, imo.  Cloud Providers don&amp;#39;t suspend entire accounts for no reason.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48212153&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, people loose their business because a kid is logged in on their iPad, gets their google account suspended, and google knows it&amp;#39;s the same household as the parent, and everything gets shut down&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48211984&quot; title=&quot;Railway don&amp;#39;t have a great reputation for building scalable systems (effects of vibe coding?). It&amp;#39;s worth waiting for Google&amp;#39;s response before jumping to conclusions. They can move to Azure/AWS/own datacenter, but there&amp;#39;s a good chance this will repeat in a few months.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. To mitigate these risks, participants suggest diversifying infrastructure through secondary failovers or migrating to more stable alternatives like DigitalOcean, AWS, or Azure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48211323&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Finally, we are in planning to remove Google Cloud services from our data plane’s hot path, and keeping them only for secondary/failover.&amp;#39; That&amp;#39;s pretty clear. Google can no longer be trusted as a B2B service provider.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48211233&quot; title=&quot;Question: for a smaller SaaS tool, or even internal product. If a team doesn&amp;#39;t want to manage AWS or another IaaS provider, what are the best alternatives for the following 1.) Vercel - having a bad month 2.) Supabase - having a bad month 3.) Railway - now having a bad month&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48211320&quot; title=&quot;DigitalOcean. Seriously. They have been around a long long time and built a lot of the core infrastructure you rely on every day (e.g. Ceph).&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48211984&quot; title=&quot;Railway don&amp;#39;t have a great reputation for building scalable systems (effects of vibe coding?). It&amp;#39;s worth waiting for Google&amp;#39;s response before jumping to conclusions. They can move to Azure/AWS/own datacenter, but there&amp;#39;s a good chance this will repeat in a few months.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://docs.flipper.net/one/general/tech-specs&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Flipper One Tech Specs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (docs.flipper.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48212046&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;519 points · 176 comments · by gregsadetsky&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Flipper One is an upcoming Linux-based multi-tool featuring a Rockchip RK3576 CPU, 8GB of RAM, a Raspberry Pi RP2350 microcontroller, and extensive connectivity including Wi-Fi 6, HDMI, and an M.2 expansion port. &lt;a href=&quot;https://docs.flipper.net/one/general/tech-specs&quot; title=&quot;Tech specs - Flipper One Documentation    Flipper One Documentation    [![Website logo](https://images.archbee.com/3StCFqarJkJQZV-7N79yY/8JaxCh8cwnpYNwd8ssDno_lz7hrl4-fzlvz5qzz-1y3-xjz2qqqgkoayp2dm8qgsf-logo-2.png)](https://docs.flipper.net/one)    `K`    [Welcome](/one)    [How to join](/one/how-to-join)    [🚧 Open tasks](/one/open-tasks)    General    [Tech specs](/one/general/tech-specs)    [Features](/one/general/features)    🔌 Hardware    [About Hardware](/one/hardware/about)    [Power…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Flipper One represents a significant shift from the Flipper Zero, moving from a simple microcontroller to a powerful 8-core Linux-based system with 8GB of RAM &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48213334&quot; title=&quot;I had similar feelings but the comments below about adding an SDR to it with an M.2 slot got me looking a little closer. This has an 8-core Rockchip A72/A53 processor and 8GB of RAM. This is not an incremental improvement over the Flipper Zero, this is something else entirely. Hmmmmm...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214710&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s more like a portable Raspberry Pi with better efficiency and more IO. And hopefully even better mainline Linux support out of the gate. The key question will be how much it costs. Beyond $250-300, it&amp;#39;s a lot more of a niche product. Below $250 would be very interesting. I don&amp;#39;t think it will be below $300. With current memory and storage pricing, probably $350-400 is more realistic :(&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users appreciate its potential as a portable Raspberry Pi alternative, others are disappointed by the apparent lack of integrated sub-GHz radio and the choice of a low-resolution grayscale display &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214955&quot; title=&quot;Display connected to the microcontroller instead of the Linux SoC is an interesting choice Actually, putting all of this powerful hardware into a custom aluminum enclosure with gorilla glass and then using a 6-bit low resolution grayscale display is a weird choice. I guess they were going for a certain grayscale low-fi vibe? The &amp;#39;needs verification&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;needs clarification&amp;#39; lines are weird. Like they asked someone (or ChatGPT?) to review some docs and post something, but forgot to review it…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48212963&quot; title=&quot;maybe I&amp;#39;m blind, but it looks like there&amp;#39;s no radio! like there&amp;#39;s wifi and bluetooth, sure, but I don&amp;#39;t see NFC or RFID or sub-1ghz radio, at all. imo the flipper always needed to be a software-defined transciever, with a small FPGA to drive it, like the other SDRs on the market. I&amp;#39;m disappointed they seem to have forsaken radio completely.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion regarding its value is split: some argue it could replace low-end general-purpose computers, while others question its utility if the price exceeds $300, noting that a cheap laptop and dongle could perform similar tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214710&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s more like a portable Raspberry Pi with better efficiency and more IO. And hopefully even better mainline Linux support out of the gate. The key question will be how much it costs. Beyond $250-300, it&amp;#39;s a lot more of a niche product. Below $250 would be very interesting. I don&amp;#39;t think it will be below $300. With current memory and storage pricing, probably $350-400 is more realistic :(&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48216550&quot; title=&quot;Does it need to be so cheap? With these specs it would make a decent replacement for a low end general purpose computer. The older NUC I use for a lot of stuff has similar-to-worse specs than this thing does.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48216770&quot; title=&quot;If it’s not cheap, then what differentiates it from a $150 Linux laptop and $30 dongle&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mapofmetal.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Map of Metal&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mapofmetal.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48205699&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;446 points · 185 comments · by robin_reala&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Map of Metal is an interactive website that provides a visual history of heavy metal genres, offering prints for purchase and recommending a desktop or tablet for the optimal experience. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mapofmetal.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Map of Metal    URL Source: https://mapofmetal.com/    Published Time: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:47:31 GMT    Warning: This is a cached snapshot of the original page, consider retry with caching opt-out.    Markdown Content:  help support the site! prints now available!    [buy online](http://www.zazzle.com/mapofmetal?rf=238327027484104866)    Mobile support coming soon. View on desktop or tablet for optimal experience.    [ENTER](https://mapofmetal.com/)    LOADING...&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The creator of Map of Metal shared that the site was originally a Flash project ported to HTML5 to preserve the &amp;#34;experimental&amp;#34; spirit of the early web, which many users feel has since been lost to SEO and monetization &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48206213&quot; title=&quot;Didn&amp;#39;t expect to see something I made on HN while my wife is trying to find something to watch on TV. So about the site in case anyone is interested. I made it with a friend who was studying multimedia. He helped with the data and I did the coding. Took about a week or two. The site was originally Flash (remember that). But I ported it to HTML5 a few years ago. It still has those Flash vibes I think. Posted the code to GitHub when I ported it. I did this mostly to keep it alive for old times…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48207394&quot; title=&quot;Younger people would never understand how amazing the internet was back in the 90s. Particularly before ads and SEO became an industry. Also Flash, most people don&amp;#39;t realize what we lost with Flash. The amount of non-professional multimedia content available was so great. It was a cooking ground for people to experiment with animation ideas. Very low hanging fruit. HTML5/Canvas/CSS just don&amp;#39;t have that accessibility. Now the internet is a complete different beast. There are 10 main  websites…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While users praised the map&amp;#39;s historical depth, some noted missing subgenres like &amp;#34;blackgaze&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;metalstep&amp;#34; and suggested adding modern &amp;#34;spiritual successors&amp;#34; to classic bands &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48210786&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve got a particular itch that&amp;#39;s difficult to scratch, and I&amp;#39;m not seeing anything on this site that reflects the genre. I&amp;#39;ve heard it as &amp;#39;metalstep&amp;#39; but I&amp;#39;m sure there are other names for it.  Very aggressive cross between metal and EDM.  More of a metal sensibility than hardcore EDM; more of an EDM / trance sensibility than, say, Fear Factory.  The drum tracks have more of a death metal vibe to them.  It&amp;#39;s probably easy to blend into other genres. I&amp;#39;m thinking stuff like Invocation Array,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48207728&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d love of this showed me the spiritual successors of a band / sub-genre even if they&amp;#39;re not mainstream or well known. For example, I really love Black Sabbath, Judas Priest, and a number of other &amp;#39;classic&amp;#39; Heavy Metal bands with a slow, hard but not sludgy brooding sound and amazing vocals. But it&amp;#39;s hard finding modern acts with a similar sound. What tends to happen when I search for modern metal is I end up finding stuff that is more a descendant of speed metal, or thrash, or black metal...…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48206271&quot; title=&quot;Great map. There might be some categories missing, couldn&amp;#39;t find any Katatonia, Agalloch, Alcest nor Tiamat. Alcest and some Deftones are considered blackgaze and Agalloch, Wolves in the Throne Room fall more into grey metal.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also touched on the evolution of genre definitions, such as the shifting historical perspective on whether artists like Jimi Hendrix or Led Zeppelin qualify as foundational metal &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48209061&quot; title=&quot;Very nice map. Historical comment only. I first listened to this music in the late 1970s. One big change in the story, over time, is how few people trace the sound to Hendrix now. (Not this map in particular. Metal fans I know would agree with the map.) I think (?) a common current viewpoint is that Led Zep [!?] was foundational but the genre really started with Black Sabbath and Judas Priest. Which, definitions change. But in 1977 I listened to Purple Haze and, sure, it was &amp;#39;Psychedelic Rock&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://spidermonkey.dev/blog/2026/05/20/saying-goodbye-to-asmjs.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Saying goodbye to asm.js&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (spidermonkey.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48206340&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;408 points · 158 comments · by eqrion&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mozilla has disabled asm.js optimizations by default in Firefox 148 and plans to remove the code entirely, as the technology has been superseded by the more advanced and widely adopted WebAssembly. &lt;a href=&quot;https://spidermonkey.dev/blog/2026/05/20/saying-goodbye-to-asmjs.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Saying goodbye to asm.js    URL Source: https://spidermonkey.dev/blog/2026/05/20/saying-goodbye-to-asmjs.html    Published Time: 2026-05-20T17:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  &amp;gt; Axe-time, sword-time, shields are sundered,  &amp;gt;   &amp;gt;  Wind-time, wolf-time, ere the world falls.  &amp;gt;   &amp;gt;  – [_Völuspá_, Poetic Edda](https://sacred-texts.com/neu/poe/poe03.htm)    As of [Firefox 148](https://www.firefox.com/en-US/firefox/148.0/releasenotes/), SpiderMonkey’s [asm.js](http://asmjs.org/) optimizations are disabled…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The retirement of asm.js marks the end of a pivotal era where it served as a bridge for high-performance web applications, such as the early versions of Figma &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48208631&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s sad but sensical. Fun fact, Figma originally started as a fully C++ codebase, and Asm.js was key in proving that it would be possible to run a design tool in the browser. The switch to WebAssembly didn&amp;#39;t happen until after there were paying customers, and provided nice improvements to load time (Asm.js is still JS which the bundle size is bigger and requires the code to be parsed into an AST, unlike WASM).&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While WebAssembly (WASM) is the official successor, some users argue that asm.js remains superior for specific tasks due to its ability to call Web APIs directly, its support for zero-copy buffers, and instances where it outperforms WASM in raw speed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48207087&quot; title=&quot;Sad day. I have a sha256 hasher in asm.js that&amp;#39;s faster than any wasm solution.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48208100&quot; title=&quot;I personally think this is a mistake. But I&amp;#39;m not sure how much it matters. It&amp;#39;s not like a lot of people were using asm.js still AFAIK. But wasm is too isolated from javascript. From my limited use of it, I was considering trying to compile to asmjs instead. But I wasn&amp;#39;t sure that emscripten still fully supported it. You can&amp;#39;t call most web apis from wasm. But more important for what i was trying to do, you can&amp;#39;t zero copy buffers from js to wasm. Everything is a trade off. The isolation is a…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48208290&quot; title=&quot;asm.js is faster than WASM, and it can do everything that JS can do.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a historical divide between Mozilla’s asm.js and Google’s PNaCl; while PNaCl offered native-like features like shared-memory threading, it suffered from slow startup times and poor portability compared to the purpose-built WASM bytecode &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48208937&quot; title=&quot;I still maintain the notion we&amp;#39;re in the wrong timeline, one where PNaCl died and instead of a worthy, timely successor we end up being boiled alive in a soup of Electron apps. I really thought, for a time, that we&amp;#39;d be doing everything in the browser . And in a way that&amp;#39;s increasingly true, but it all just feels worse than ever. I like WASM and I want to like WASM but the rate of maturity within the ecosystem is incredibly abysmal. What&amp;#39;s worse is that we should all be running our…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48209252&quot; title=&quot;There were 3 systems, all with interesting differences. The original NaCl was a &amp;#39;validated subset&amp;#39; of native CPU machine code (e.g. actual x86 machine code with some instructions and instruction sequences disallowed which would allow to escape the sandbox). The next iteration was P(ortable)-NaCl which replaced the native machine code with a subset of LLVM bitcode, which was then compiled at load time. Unfortunately with this step NaCl lost most of its advantages. Startup time was atrocious…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite WASM&amp;#39;s dominance, some developers lament the &amp;#34;abysmal&amp;#34; rate of ecosystem maturity and the loss&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/202x/2026/05/19/Declining-America&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Declining America&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tbray.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214049&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;382 points · 173 comments · by AndrewDucker&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Canadian technologist Tim Bray declined an invitation to a U.S.-based conference, citing concerns over threats to Canadian sovereignty and the personal risk of border officials scrutinizing his social media history. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/202x/2026/05/19/Declining-America&quot; title=&quot;Title: Declining America    URL Source: https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/202x/2026/05/19/Declining-America    Markdown Content:  Recently I got an invitation from an organization I respect, to a gathering of senior people, unconference format. Yes, it’s mostly about AI. No, it doesn’t reek of boosterism. My guess is that the discussions would be relatively intelligent and unbeliever contributions would be welcome. I declined, because it’s in the USA.    Here’s the text; maybe someone in a similar…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the decline of the United States as a destination for technologists, with some arguing that recent political outcomes are the result of systemic institutional failure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214180&quot; title=&quot;Elections have consequences.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214544&quot; title=&quot;The election outcome itself was the consequence of gross, systemic failure throughout the entirety of the United States&amp;#39; citizenry, society, institutions, and government. The best thing for the States to do at this point would be to hold a Constitutional Convention and dissolve the government of the United States as unfit for any purpose, after which their citizens can decide how they wish to proceed.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users believe the U.S. has permanently damaged its international trust, others point to historical precedents like post-WWII Germany to suggest recovery is possible &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214208&quot; title=&quot;yes and the results and actions taken after the Nov 6 US elections may undo some of the damage.  But no other country will ever trust the foreign policy of the US no matter what happens.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48214275&quot; title=&quot;Never say never. Germany seems to have recovered quite a lot of trust following World War 2, to provide an extreme example of bad foreign policy.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Debates also emerged regarding the nature of nations, with some viewing them as &amp;#34;historical hallucinations&amp;#34; that should be replaced by global brotherhood, while others argue that borders represent essential, deep-seated ethno-cultural differences &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48217061&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d like to say that as an American to your north, I think you&amp;#39;re right to not come?  Things are weird here presently, so I suspect you probably made the right call for a wide variety of reasons. But also, I tire of the nationalist rhetoric wherever I see it.  I&amp;#39;m tired of this idea that countries are anything more than a shared historical hallucination, and that we&amp;#39;re all somehow different from one another.  Or as my father often put it, &amp;#39;we all bleed red and we all shit brown.&amp;#39;  I never chose…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48218073&quot; title=&quot;Have you spent any serious time with other cultures? Yes, we all have the same colored blood and excrement, and we have a lot of similarities. Yet at the same time, we are very different. England&amp;#39;s traditional dignity culture (the virtuous man can overlook slights) is very different than Africa&amp;#39;s honor culture (honor is zero-sum, and you must fight to maintain it), for instance. Japanese values and American values are frequently opposite (Japan values group membership, America values…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48219194&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; England&amp;#39;s traditional dignity culture (the virtuous man can overlook slights) i’m english and i have no idea what you’re on about there mate. are you talking about having basic tolerance for other people? that’s a pretty universal skill not exclusive to england. &amp;gt; but &amp;#39;countries are [nothing] more than a shared historical hallucination&amp;#39; is just incorrect. countries are mostly lines drawn on a map. cultures, which i think is what you’re trying to get at in your post generally, differ…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, commenters defended the thread&amp;#39;s relevance to Hacker News, noting that the political climate directly impacts the movement and safety of high-profile technologists &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48215547&quot; title=&quot;I think this belongs on hacker news (and unflagged) mainly because of who Tim Bray is. Notably co-inventor of XML, worked on a bunch of web standards etc. Whether you agree or disagree with non-US citizens coming to America to engage in the advancement of technology, the important thing is to have discourse on the topic. That is in line with aims and goals of this site. This story is much less politics and much more about the impact of social policy on technologists. As a non-US citizen myself…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/kageroumado/phosphene&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: I reverse engineered Apple&amp;#39;s video wallpapers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48215979&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;426 points · 106 comments · by kageroumado&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer has open-sourced Phosphene, a tool created by reverse-engineering macOS frameworks to allow users to integrate custom, battery-efficient video wallpapers directly into the system&amp;#39;s native settings. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/kageroumado/phosphene&quot; title=&quot;Ever since Apple introduced their video wallpapers I wanted to be able to put custom videos there. I decided to reverse engineer and see what I can do.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;I built Phosphene to sell it, but the existing competitors were polished enough that the time it would have taken to catch up wasn&amp;amp;#x27;t going to pay off. So I&amp;amp;#x27;m open-sourcing it.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;WallpaperExtensionKit.framework is what powers macOS wallpapers. It controls what’s shows in the Settings app. It took a lot of trial and error to replicate…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The project evokes nostalgia for Windows Vista’s aesthetic, though users are divided on whether moving wallpapers are a fun &amp;#34;vibe&amp;#34; or a distraction that could be &amp;#34;vomit-inducing&amp;#34; on large monitors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48216875&quot; title=&quot;As much (fairly well deserved) hate as Tahoe gets, the video wallpapers and transparency are such a fun Windows Vista vibe I get nostalgia. Time to set this up with the Vista waterfall wallpaper and reallllyyy feel like it’s 2007!&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48216545&quot; title=&quot;Good on ya. I won&amp;#39;t use it, myself, because I can&amp;#39;t deal with wallpaper moving behind my work (I also can&amp;#39;t listen to music, while I work. Maybe it&amp;#39;s a &amp;#39;generational&amp;#39; thing). Also, I use a 49-inch ultrawide, so it might be vomit-inducing. I remember some other utility that played wallpaper videos, but it wasn&amp;#39;t anywhere near as nicely done.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some worry Apple might break the reverse-engineered functionality, others believe the underlying system is stable enough that it won&amp;#39;t be a priority for updates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48216457&quot; title=&quot;Very cool! However, it may definitely get broken by Apple, as you note.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48216494&quot; title=&quot;I don’t think they’ll touch this part anytime soon. It’s been unchanged for a few years now, they certainly have other priorities.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Much of the discussion centers on the passage of time, with users joking about the realization that Vista was released nearly two decades ago &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48217610&quot; title=&quot;There are likely a number of folks on this forum now who were born after Vista was released.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48217762&quot; title=&quot;Nope. 2007 is like 2 or 3 years ago, tops.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48219603&quot; title=&quot;Vista released over 19 years ago.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20260515-the-1950s-blunder-which-causes-mass-hay-fever-in-japan&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Japan is gripped by mass allergies. A 1950s project is to blame&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48202047&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;349 points · 157 comments · by ranit&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Japan is tackling a national hay fever crisis caused by post-WWII reforestation projects that blanketed the country in pollen-heavy cedar and cypress monocultures, prompting a 30-year government plan to halve pollen levels by thinning plantations and restoring biodiverse natural forests. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20260515-the-1950s-blunder-which-causes-mass-hay-fever-in-japan&quot; title=&quot;Title: Japan is gripped by mass allergies. A 1950s project is to blame    URL Source: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20260515-the-1950s-blunder-which-causes-mass-hay-fever-in-japan    Published Time: 2026-05-19T10:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  2 days ago    Nithin Coca    ![Image 1](https://static.files.bbci.co.uk/bbcdotcom/web/20260514-083048-90b828604e-web-3.5.1-1/grey-placeholder.png)![Image 2: Getty Images A Japanese woman with short dark brown hair wears a white surgical mask. Cars are seen in…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Japan&amp;#39;s allergy crisis is linked to 1950s monoculture &amp;#34;tree farms&amp;#34; that were never harvested due to cheaper imports &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48204451&quot; title=&quot;Only two types of tree? Even in the 1970&amp;#39;s surely that should have been cause for concern.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48204521&quot; title=&quot;This might have something to do with it: &amp;gt; When the sugi and hinoki forests were first planted in the 1950s and 60s, they weren&amp;#39;t meant to stand forever. At the time, it was assumed they would be gradually cut down and replanted over time, as had been the case before the war. But as Japan&amp;#39;s economy boomed in the late 60s and 70s, major cities like Kobe and Tokyo grew rapidly, and it ended up being cheaper to import wood from other countries such as Malaysia and Indonesia.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, commenters debate whether the specific tree species or modern hygiene standards are the primary drivers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48204697&quot; title=&quot;Hmm, most German forests are also vast monoculture &amp;#39;tree farms&amp;#39; and have been for the last 250 years (also caused by large scale deforestation in the centuries before). In the Ore Mountains we also have those yellow clouds of pollen coming off spruce trees every few years, covering everything with a thin yellow dust layer, yet I&amp;#39;m not aware that the number of people with pollen allergies is exceptionally high (oth, maybe it was 200 years ago and by now the population has become immune, or maybe…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48205206&quot; title=&quot;Probably we can blame higher hygiene standards, or some other environmental factor for it. Forests haven&amp;#39;t changed much in past decades. Here in Finland I&amp;#39;ve never been affected by any kind of tree pollen at all, but somehow timothy grass pollen gives me horrible symptoms, forcing me to take antihistamine most of the summer. I lived my childhood near farmland and forests, so definitely got exposed to both forms of pollen at early age.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Some suggest that &amp;#34;arboreal sexism&amp;#34;—the urban preference for male trees to avoid messy fruit—has artificially increased pollen loads &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48205704&quot; title=&quot;“Arboreal sexism” is a similar phenomenon: We prefer male trees in cities since they do not produce fruit that drop on the streets. The result is a much higher pollen load.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, while others point to a lack of microbial diversity in sanitized environments as a likely cause for skyrocketing allergy rates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48204963&quot; title=&quot;Hmm, I&amp;#39;m also wondering about studies about overly sanitized environments for children being correlated with higher allergy rates. I guess poking around for a good representative study, it&amp;#39;s actually low diversity of microbial exposure, not &amp;#39;cleaning&amp;#39; per-se that is correlated - e.g this is one reason why households with dogs have lower allergy rates.  A monoculture of certain tree species also implies less microbial diversity.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Personal observations vary by region, with some noting high pollen levels in European spruce forests without similar health epidemics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48204697&quot; title=&quot;Hmm, most German forests are also vast monoculture &amp;#39;tree farms&amp;#39; and have been for the last 250 years (also caused by large scale deforestation in the centuries before). In the Ore Mountains we also have those yellow clouds of pollen coming off spruce trees every few years, covering everything with a thin yellow dust layer, yet I&amp;#39;m not aware that the number of people with pollen allergies is exceptionally high (oth, maybe it was 200 years ago and by now the population has become immune, or maybe…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48205066&quot; title=&quot;The spruce and other local conifers (I live by the Bohemian Forest/Bayerischer Wald) have pollen that seems to be low allergenic by design. I know a lot of people who are allergic to birch or weed pollen, but not to spruce.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, while others report a recent &amp;#34;epidemic&amp;#34; of sneezing in offices elsewhere &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48205137&quot; title=&quot;Pollen allergies have definitely skyrocketed in Sweden. We used to be able to sit in an office and work all year without hearing people sniffle and sneeze. Now it&amp;#39;s like an epidemic, at least half the office is affected.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-19</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-19</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/karpathy/status/2056753169888334312&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I’ve joined Anthropic&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48194352&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1426 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 616 comments · by dmarcos&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Andrej Karpathy, a prominent AI researcher and former founding member of OpenAI, has announced that he is joining the AI safety and research company Anthropic. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/karpathy/status/2056753169888334312&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;karpathy&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2056753169888334312&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;karpathy&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2056753169888334312&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.axios.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;05&amp;amp;#x2F;19&amp;amp;#x2F;anthropic-openai-karpathy-andrej-claude&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.axios.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;05&amp;amp;#x2F;19&amp;amp;#x2F;anthropic-openai-karpathy-a...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;h6T3X&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion regarding Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic is divided between those who see him as a top-tier talent who strengthens the pre-training team &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48194484&quot; title=&quot;Karpathy is talented and to me he always seemed like someone who would be against building something like skynet. Anthropic is lucky to have him.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48195873&quot; title=&quot;Karpathy will start this week on Anthropic&amp;#39;s pre-training team, which is responsible for the massive training runs that give Claude its core knowledge and capabilities, according to Anthropic. Source: https://www.axios.com/2026/05/19/anthropic-openai-karpathy-a...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt; and skeptics who view the move as a &amp;#34;celebrity hire&amp;#34; or marketing stunt intended to boost IPO value &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48196506&quot; title=&quot;He moves around quite a bit. Less than 2 years on average if you take away the longest and shortest jobs. It feels like this is just a celebrity hire to help raise IPO value, and then he&amp;#39;ll move again when the tech hits another real-world scaling wall. Expect another short stint (stunt) with Anthropic.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48194695&quot; title=&quot;i wouldn&amp;#39;t be surprised if he just becomes a glorified marketer for anthro. im also going to guess that whatever research he does would be free roam research that primarily serves to market the fact that claude was able to help perform the research. the visible stuff he&amp;#39;s been working on has been mostly agent soft skills. off the top of my head is autoresearch and his the wiki knowledge stuff. nothing particularly groundbreaking, but has helped devs expand their understanding of the utility…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48194804&quot; title=&quot;I read this as a bad sign for Anthropic. Relying yet again on more hype instead of improving products. OpenAI’s hiring recently has been much stronger, whether through luck or structure. The “no-name” guys have actual taste. I love that. I don’t care that they’re no-names. I don’t know Karpathy personally, I won’t speak bad about a man I don’t know. I hope he makes CC better. I just read this as hype. My point is that there’s nothing he has that an empowered no-name product manager doesn’t.…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users criticize his frequent job-hopping, others point out that his five-year tenure at Tesla is significant for the tech industry &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48194639&quot; title=&quot;Karpathy is probably one of the biggest names in AI, I do wonder where he fits now. He&amp;#39;s sort of bounced around Tesla back to OpenAI back to independent. He sort of left OpenAI before it really hit the inflection point, and he was at Tesla for a long time and they didn&amp;#39;t really deliver what they wanted on the AI side. Now he&amp;#39;s bounced around a few places. I understand that the leaders in this market play this silly game of trying to buy up the names like trading cards but I wonder what this…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48196983&quot; title=&quot;5 years at Tesla is an eternity in the tech world. And 2 years is probably pretty average for the whole tech industry.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a broader debate about Anthropic’s trajectory, with some users praising their safety-conscious culture &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48194484&quot; title=&quot;Karpathy is talented and to me he always seemed like someone who would be against building something like skynet. Anthropic is lucky to have him.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt; while others fear the company is becoming an &amp;#34;industry tornado&amp;#34; that prioritizes hype over product merit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48196037&quot; title=&quot;Anyone else fearing Anthropic more and more each day?  Not from a perspective that they are doing so well, but rather that it&amp;#39;s like an industry tornado, sucking up and destroying everything in it&amp;#39;s path.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48194804&quot; title=&quot;I read this as a bad sign for Anthropic. Relying yet again on more hype instead of improving products. OpenAI’s hiring recently has been much stronger, whether through luck or structure. The “no-name” guys have actual taste. I love that. I don’t care that they’re no-names. I don’t know Karpathy personally, I won’t speak bad about a man I don’t know. I hope he makes CC better. I just read this as hype. My point is that there’s nothing he has that an empowered no-name product manager doesn’t.…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/products/search/search-io-2026/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Google changes its search box&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.google)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48197370&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;698 points · &lt;strong&gt;931 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by berkeleyjunk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google is redesigning its iconic search box to integrate Gemini AI, shifting the platform from a list of links toward a conversational interface that provides direct answers and synthesized information. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/products/search/search-io-2026/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.nytimes.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;05&amp;amp;#x2F;19&amp;amp;#x2F;business&amp;amp;#x2F;google-seach-bar-ai-gemini.html?unlocked_article_code=1.jlA.95yh.ptfBUHf-rBtB&amp;amp;amp;smid=url-share&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.nytimes.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;05&amp;amp;#x2F;19&amp;amp;#x2F;business&amp;amp;#x2F;google-seach-bar...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;XI1sQ&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;XI1sQ&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The integration of AI into Google Search has sparked significant concern regarding &amp;#34;Google Zero,&amp;#34; a scenario where the search engine ceases to drive traffic to external websites, leading site owners to question the value of allowing crawlers at all &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48197528&quot; title=&quot;Nilay Patel has been talking about &amp;#39;Google Zero&amp;#39; - the moment when Google effectively stops sending any traffic to other sites - for a few years now: https://www.theverge.com/24167865/google-zero-search-crash-h...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48197769&quot; title=&quot;Which as some running a website raises a fascinating question. If Google is just going to crawl my sites and present information as an AI summary on their site, then what exactly do I gain by allowing Googlebot to crawl my sites?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Users report frequent inaccuracies and &amp;#34;bullshit answers&amp;#34; that complicate professional work and potentially endanger users seeking medical or financial advice &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48199476&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; What scares me about this new AI mode thingy What scares me is the rampant inaccuracy. In my experience, the AI responses are wrong about 65% of the time. I just did a search today about an error talking about a disconnected link between apps, and Google AI result summary told me that the error was related to my pulling a USB drive too quickly in windows. The ONLY word similar to my query and that AI response was the word &amp;#39;disconnect&amp;#39;. Everything else was clearly about the SaaS apps. I have…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48199543&quot; title=&quot;Yep. For years we&amp;#39;ve been telling people to &amp;#39;just fucking google it&amp;#39;, and now when they do they&amp;#39;re getting bullshit AI answers. Worst thing is, some of these bullshit answers will be medical, some of them financial, it seems pretty certain people are being harmed.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200345&quot; title=&quot;It seems to me one needs to consider the complexity of the question they are asking before searching it. To stick with your post, consider people asking medical or financial questions. For a wide variety of reasons, many of such questions don&amp;#39;t have an answer. In such cases, AI is still going to take a crack at it. AI shouldn&amp;#39;t be blamed for &amp;#39;bullshit answers&amp;#39; to such questions. Before using AI, I think people should stop and ask themselves, &amp;#39;Is there really a single answer to this question? Is…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some have already shifted their habits toward LLMs or alternative search engines, there is a strong consensus that these AI summaries often present &amp;#34;random stuff&amp;#34; as ground truth while lacking the essential primary sources required for factual reliability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48199338&quot; title=&quot;What scares me about this new AI mode thingy is that every answer sounds like a systematic literature review, but only for the results. For example, if I look for users feedback about a specific product, it says &amp;#39;People think that..., but also that...; It&amp;#39;s important to notice that some people ...&amp;#39; where with &amp;#39;people&amp;#39; it means just a random comment on a random website just because it thought it was a good contribution to the results. Sounds like it&amp;#39;s giving a ground truth from &amp;#39;multiple&amp;#39; data,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48197597&quot; title=&quot;I understand why they are doing this. My Google search usage is easily down 50%+. I doubt I am unique here. While there are times where I want pure search (Kagi, Old Google) I mostly use LLMs to search now and have them provide me links for source data. When I do use LLMs as a search engine I always want it integrated into my AI workflows with access to tools and scripts etc. I never want to have a conversation with a website that is geared towards advertising me products.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48197660&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t trust facts from LLMs. When I am searching for something, I usually want to find primary sources. As soon as a number is involved, I do my best to not even look at the AI output. Even though the result is often good and combines information from multiple sources, it can also get things wrong by combining information from different eras or just plain outdated advice. AFAICT, without primary sources, the result is for entertainment purposes only.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48197470&quot; title=&quot;Kind of Google to create a market opening for its competitors like this. I hope Kagi, Bing, and DuckDuckGo are taking notes.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/gemini-models/gemini-3-5/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Gemini 3.5 Flash&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.google)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48196570&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;959 points · 655 comments · by spectraldrift&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google has introduced Gemini 3.5 Flash, a high-speed, cost-efficient AI model designed for low-latency performance and high-volume tasks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/gemini-models/gemini-3-5/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;ai.google.dev&amp;amp;#x2F;gemini-api&amp;amp;#x2F;docs&amp;amp;#x2F;models&amp;amp;#x2F;gemini-3.5-flash&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;ai.google.dev&amp;amp;#x2F;gemini-api&amp;amp;#x2F;docs&amp;amp;#x2F;models&amp;amp;#x2F;gemini-3.5-flas...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of Gemini 3.5 Flash has sparked significant concern over its pricing, which represents a 3x to 6x increase over previous Flash models and positions it closer to the cost of older &amp;#34;Pro&amp;#34; versions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48197727&quot; title=&quot;Per million input/output tokens: Gemini 2.5 flash: $0.30/$2.50 Gemini 3.0 flash preview: $0.50/$3.00 Gemini 3.5 flash: $1.50/$9.00 Interesting pricing direction. I don&amp;#39;t think we have ever seen a 3x price increase for in the immediate next same-sized model (and lol @ 3 only ever getting a preview). 3.5 flash costs similar to Gemini 2.5 pro which was $1.25/$10&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48196891&quot; title=&quot;$1.5/m input tokens  $9/m output tokens 6x the price of 3.1 flash lite&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users praise Google’s focus on optimizing smaller models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48196899&quot; title=&quot;Engineers at google have publically stated that the models are too big and are far from their potencial. Glad they&amp;#39;re being proven right with every release. They continue to focus on smaller models while openai and anthropic are increasing compute requirements for their SOTA models.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that these rising costs make AI increasingly inaccessible to individuals and suggest that serving LLMs profitably remains a major challenge &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48198303&quot; title=&quot;We need another &amp;#39;Deepseek moment&amp;#39; or else it will become impossible for the regular dude to use AI. It will become something that only big companies can afford.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48198162&quot; title=&quot;Gen AI is unprofitable, especially at the insanely cheap rates they&amp;#39;ve been offering to get people in the door. So expect more increases in the future.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48197882&quot; title=&quot;If Google is actually getting cheaper inference than everyone else with their TPUs, this smells like trouble to me. Maybe serving LLMs at a profit is proving difficult. Or maybe they think because their benchmarks are good they can ramp up the prices. Seems like they don’t have the market share to justify a move like that yet to me.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Early testing shows mixed results: the model demonstrates impressive reasoning capabilities for complex SVG generation, yet it can still struggle with anatomical logic in images and carries a high per-request cost for long outputs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48198232&quot; title=&quot;The pelican is a lot : https://github.com/simonw/llm-gemini/issues/133#issuecomment... Not a great bicycle though, it forgot the bar between the pedals and the back wheel and weirdly tangled the other bars. Expensive too - that pelican cost 13 cents: https://www.llm-prices.com/#it=11&amp;amp;ot=14403&amp;amp;sel=gemini-3.5-fl...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48197136&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Create animated SVG of a frog on a boat rowing through jungle river. Single page self contained HTML page with SVG 3.5 Flash: Thinking Medium - 7516 tokens https://gistpreview.github.io/?5c9858fd2057e678b55d563d9bff0... 3.5 Flash: Thinking High - 7280 tokens https://gistpreview.github.io/?1cab3d70064349d08cf5952cdc165... 3.1 Pro - 28,258 tokens https://gistpreview.github.io/?6bf3da2f80487608b9525bce53018... Though 3.1 took 3 minutes of thinking to generate, but it only one that got animated…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://simonwillison.net/2026/May/19/5-minute-llms/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The last six months in LLMs in five minutes&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (simonwillison.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48188183&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;795 points · 587 comments · by yakkomajuri&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At PyCon US 2026, Simon Willison summarized the previous six months of LLM progress, highlighting a November 2025 inflection point where coding agents became reliable daily tools and the rise of &amp;#34;Claws&amp;#34;—personal AI assistants—driven by powerful new open-weight models from Google, GLM, and Alibaba. &lt;a href=&quot;https://simonwillison.net/2026/May/19/5-minute-llms/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The last six months in LLMs in five minutes    URL Source: https://simonwillison.net/2026/May/19/5-minute-llms/    Published Time: Wed, 20 May 2026 04:42:34 GMT    Markdown Content:  19th May 2026    I put together these annotated slides from my five minute lightning talk at PyCon US 2026, using the [latest iteration](https://tools.simonwillison.net/annotated-presentations) of my [annotated presentation tool](https://simonwillison.net/2023/Aug/6/annotated-presentations/).    ![Image 1: The last six…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The recent &amp;#34;inflection point&amp;#34; in LLM capabilities has sparked a polarized debate between users who find agents capable of high-quality, professional-grade work and those who view them as overhyped tools prone to errors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48190464&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The coding agents got really good It&amp;#39;s since november 2025, the so called &amp;#39;inflection point&amp;#39;, that I&amp;#39;m still wondering for who coding agents become &amp;#39;really good&amp;#39;. All I observe they got better at tool call and answering questions about big codebases, especially if the question has a vague pattern to search, and they&amp;#39;re superuseful for that! For generating production code even with a lot of steering and baby sitting? Absolutely not, not quite there not even close in my experience. But we…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48190541&quot; title=&quot;The polarization comes from the very disparate coding experiences and output quality that different people find when using these tools. For example, I&amp;#39;ve had the opposite experience of yours, generating very high quality work using Claude (such as https://github.com/kstenerud/yoloai ). Just in dealing with all the bugs and idiosyncrasies in the technologies I&amp;#39;m using, the agent has been a godsend in discovering and cataloguing them so that the implementation phase doesn&amp;#39;t keep tripping over…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48188907&quot; title=&quot;I wonder how much the &amp;#39;inflection point&amp;#39; is a thing vs marketing. I&amp;#39;m sure the models got somewhat better, but even now when I&amp;#39;m trying to &amp;#39;vibe code&amp;#39; a game with the latest models (combination of Codex w/ gpt5.5 and gpt5.3-codex), they really do struggle. They definitely get something barebones up and running, but it&amp;#39;s far from a fully fledged application.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some developers claim to have transitioned entirely to AI-driven coding for professional tasks, critics argue that the output often lacks coherence and requires significant &amp;#34;babysitting&amp;#34; to reach production standards &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48190541&quot; title=&quot;The polarization comes from the very disparate coding experiences and output quality that different people find when using these tools. For example, I&amp;#39;ve had the opposite experience of yours, generating very high quality work using Claude (such as https://github.com/kstenerud/yoloai ). Just in dealing with all the bugs and idiosyncrasies in the technologies I&amp;#39;m using, the agent has been a godsend in discovering and cataloguing them so that the implementation phase doesn&amp;#39;t keep tripping over…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48190751&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t want to offend (it&amp;#39;s AI coded anyway :)) but that does not scream &amp;#39;high quality&amp;#39; to me. The headline gif on that repo just paints a terrible picture. It can&amp;#39;t draw a box correctly, there&amp;#39;s random underscores all over the screen. The UI itself is just incredibly incoherent. I don&amp;#39;t even know what I&amp;#39;m looking at. Like, no it doesn&amp;#39;t seem like very high quality work... It just seems like a vibe coded tool. Edit: yes it&amp;#39;s wrapping Claude. It&amp;#39;s BREAKING the TUI. Not sure what people aren&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48189181&quot; title=&quot;I remember this very clearly myself. Before opus 4.5, I was doing a lot of hand holding and was coding a lot myself, but I have not written code since that day more or less. I did write some stuff myself just to learn how the enigma encryption machine worked, so wrote myself to learn. But professionally, I stopped coding in November.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. This divide is exacerbated by disagreements over whether the technology is truly revolutionary or if the perceived progress is largely a result of effective marketing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48190464&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The coding agents got really good It&amp;#39;s since november 2025, the so called &amp;#39;inflection point&amp;#39;, that I&amp;#39;m still wondering for who coding agents become &amp;#39;really good&amp;#39;. All I observe they got better at tool call and answering questions about big codebases, especially if the question has a vague pattern to search, and they&amp;#39;re superuseful for that! For generating production code even with a lot of steering and baby sitting? Absolutely not, not quite there not even close in my experience. But we…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48188907&quot; title=&quot;I wonder how much the &amp;#39;inflection point&amp;#39; is a thing vs marketing. I&amp;#39;m sure the models got somewhat better, but even now when I&amp;#39;m trying to &amp;#39;vibe code&amp;#39; a game with the latest models (combination of Codex w/ gpt5.5 and gpt5.3-codex), they really do struggle. They definitely get something barebones up and running, but it&amp;#39;s far from a fully fledged application.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48191033&quot; title=&quot;Take it up with Anthropic. It&amp;#39;s actually their billion-dollar TUI product you&amp;#39;re commenting on. The problem with being such a naysayer is that you&amp;#39;re entirely disconnected from what&amp;#39;s going on. You haven&amp;#39;t tried an agent like Claude Code and experienced it for yourself, so you don&amp;#39;t recognise what it looks like when it&amp;#39;s in front of you.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtualosmuseum.org/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I’ve built a virtual museum with nearly every operating system you can think of&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (virtualosmuseum.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48195009&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;964 points · 223 comments · by andreww591&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Virtual OS Museum is a downloadable Linux-based virtual machine featuring over 570 pre-configured operating systems and 250 platforms, allowing users to explore the history of computing from 1948 to the present through a custom, snapshot-enabled launcher. &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtualosmuseum.org/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Virtual OS Museum    URL Source: https://virtualosmuseum.org/    Published Time: Wed, 20 May 2026 03:04:18 GMT    Markdown Content:  This is a virtual museum of operating systems (and standalone applications) running under emulation, implemented as a Linux VM for QEMU, VirtualBox, or UTM.    A custom emulator-independent launcher is provided, and all OSes and emulators are pre-installed and pre-configured. The launcher includes a snapshot feature to quickly revert broken installations back to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The virtual museum sparked deep nostalgia for niche interfaces, such as the unique &amp;#34;pad&amp;#34; input system of Domain/OS &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48195763&quot; title=&quot;I hadn&amp;#39;t realized Domain/OS emulation was viable these days.  It&amp;#39;s one of the few systems that has actually &amp;#39;lost&amp;#39; features - the terminal-window-like thing (called pads, I think?) when in line mode had a dividing line at the bottom where your unconsumed typeahead was visible and you could continue to edit it until it got read - not just one line, the entire unconsumed input.  (Not that it&amp;#39;s a particularly desirable feature - it&amp;#39;s just one that I&amp;#39;m pretty sure you can&amp;#39;t implement with ptys...)&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt; and the &amp;#34;paper folder&amp;#34; desktop environment found on early Compaq Windows 3.1 machines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48195180&quot; title=&quot;Do you have that Windows 3.1 version that came with the Compaq that had the DE that was like a paper folder instead of an empty desktop, and that you could put the icons in the different tabs of the paper folder?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48196185&quot; title=&quot;This triggered a rabbit hole search that had me rediscover Packard Bell Navigator[1]. The nostalgia and joy this page brings me is hard to describe. I hope everyone remembers their formative tech journey so fondly. 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Packard_Bell_Navigator&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While users praised the collection&amp;#39;s breadth, some noted the absence of historically significant systems like Novell Netware, the Pick operating system, and the now-lost pre-Domain/OS AEGIS &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48197442&quot; title=&quot;No Pick? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pick_operating_system My first actual job was working for a local health authority here in the UK, and they had a Pick computer running some database application thing, I think to do with accounting. I had to run the backups. Sorry to be a whinger, I don&amp;#39;t mean to belittle the monumental amount of work.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48197347&quot; title=&quot;Unfortunately, pre-Domain/OS AEGIS is basically lost. One person popped up with talk of imaging their 9.6 floppies, but I haven&amp;#39;t seen anything since then. [1] https://www.facebook.com/groups/retrocomputers/posts/7062462...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48195880&quot; title=&quot;quite a decent collection. and actual working osses. one that i noticed missing: Novell Netware,  I spent several years in de 90s developing software for it. It was the main office network server software on those days. 3.x, 4.x ran on relatively regular 32-bit PC server hardware.  2.x ran on the 80286 in protected mode,  the only OS I know which did that. Copies can be found at  archive.org.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Due to the massive 120GB file size and slow server speeds, several commenters are actively attempting to create a torrent to facilitate easier access for the community &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48195787&quot; title=&quot;Could really do with a torrent. 120GB at 3MB/sec...&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48197580&quot; title=&quot;If my download ever finishes i&amp;#39;ll spin up a torrent. So far on retry/resume #12, 97.3/120GB done  (i am live updating this comment as long as i can)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/05/apple-unveils-new-accessibility-features-and-updates-with-apple-intelligence/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apple unveils new accessibility features&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (apple.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48192224&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;725 points · 381 comments · by interpol_p&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple has unveiled new accessibility updates powered by Apple Intelligence, including natural language voice control, AI-generated video subtitles, and a feature allowing Apple Vision Pro users to control power wheelchairs using eye-tracking technology. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/05/apple-unveils-new-accessibility-features-and-updates-with-apple-intelligence/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Apple unveils new accessibility features, and updates powered by Apple Intelligence    URL Source: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/05/apple-unveils-new-accessibility-features-and-updates-with-apple-intelligence/    Published Time: 2026-05-19Z    Markdown Content:  # Apple unveils new accessibility features, and updates with Apple Intelligence - Apple    *   [Apple](https://www.apple.com/)  *         *   [Store](https://www.apple.com/us/shop/goto/store)    ## Shop        *   [Shop the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple’s new accessibility features are viewed as a strategic &amp;#34;stealth test&amp;#34; for agentic AI, following a pattern where the company debuts advanced tech in niche tools before a broader rollout &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48195239&quot; title=&quot;Apple loves to stealth test new tech in full public view by sneaking it into relatively mundane places, so debuting agentic AI via accessibility is very on brand. A few other examples: - The Touch Bar was much more than an OLED strip, it was Apple’s first move in the transition to Apple Silicon on macs. The Apple T1 chip in the 2016 Touch Bar MacBooks was the first solely Apple-designed processor to appear in a Mac and took over several responsibilities away from intel chipsets like power…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48192471&quot; title=&quot;This looks like a genuinely useful application of LLMs. I wish more companies focused on how they can help humans instead of replacing us or squeezing us as hard as possible in the name of productivity.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While users praise Apple&amp;#39;s leadership in accessibility, there is significant criticism regarding their lagging speech-to-text and autocorrect capabilities, which some feel have regressed over the last decade &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48193196&quot; title=&quot;One thing Apple really needs to get right is speech to text transcription. They&amp;#39;ve nailed accessibility in so many ways and yet it feels like they&amp;#39;re a decade behind on properly transcribing voices. At least half a decade. Input on the iPhone is so dreadful nowadays. Their palm rejection is definitely worse than before, so mistyping is more frequent. Their text-correction algorithm for typing is worse than before, and it frequently makes incorrect corrections to words that I don&amp;#39;t notice,…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights the &amp;#34;unimaginable&amp;#34; speeds at which blind users process audio, noting that sighted people often require practice just to tolerate 1.5x or 2.0x speeds &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48192501&quot; title=&quot;Fun fact: This video was made accessible to sighted people because no blind person would ever listen to voice at that speed. Honestly if you ever observe a blind person using computers you&amp;#39;d impressed how they can listen to audio at unimaginable speeds.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48192658&quot; title=&quot;https://youtu.be/wKISPePFrIs?si=ahGfFp0U7-pTU9w6&amp;amp;t=43 my go to example of this is this talk by Saqib Shaikh (a blind software engineer at Microsoft) giving a talk about Visual Studio. Link is timestamped&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48192896&quot; title=&quot;I think it takes quite a lot of practice to reach this speed. It&amp;#39;s not rare among blind developers, but I think it still takes a lot of work to get there. Pretty impressive! I wish more people would watch videos like this just because having a realistic idea of how blind people do certain tasks can help you move from pity or even compassion to a more productive kind of understanding. I think sometimes when you haven&amp;#39;t seen it, you can&amp;#39;t really even imagine how it can be done.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48193283&quot; title=&quot;I listen to a lot of podcasts and listen at 1.5-2.0 speed and it’s to the point that I literally cannot stand listening to 1.0 speed anymore as they go too slowly (depending on the content of course).&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.npr.org/2026/05/19/nx-s1-5821265/minnesota-ban-prediction-markets&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Minnesota becomes first state to ban prediction markets&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (npr.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48197980&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;785 points · 245 comments · by ortusdux&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Minnesota Governor Tim Walz signed a law making it a felony to host or advertise prediction markets, prompting a federal lawsuit from the Trump administration which argues the industry should be regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission rather than individual states. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.npr.org/2026/05/19/nx-s1-5821265/minnesota-ban-prediction-markets&quot; title=&quot;Title: Minnesota becomes first state to ban prediction markets    URL Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/05/19/nx-s1-5821265/minnesota-ban-prediction-markets    Published Time: 2026-05-19T12:28:32-04:00    Markdown Content:  # Minnesota to ban prediction markets like Kalshi, Polymarket : NPR    Accessibility links  *   [Skip to main content](https://www.npr.org/2026/05/19/nx-s1-5821265/minnesota-ban-prediction-markets#mainContent)  *   [Keyboard shortcuts for audio…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Minnesota’s ban on prediction markets is seen as legally stronger than potential bans in other states because Minnesota also prohibits sports betting, avoiding contradictions regarding the morality or mechanics of gambling &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48199528&quot; title=&quot;For the record, Minnesota currently has a complete ban on sports betting. We&amp;#39;ve seen a couple other states that allow sports betting go after prediction markets. Personally, I feel that any state that allows sports betting is going to struggle to argue a case to ban prediction markets because you&amp;#39;re essentially arguing over implementation details. Even arguments that certain prediction markets are ripe for insider trading or morally wrong fall a bit flat when you realize that traditional…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. However, commenters debate whether federal CFTC regulations on commodities futures might preempt state law, or if prediction markets are fundamentally different from sportsbooks because they function as peer-to-peer exchanges rather than &amp;#34;house&amp;#34; models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48198670&quot; title=&quot;as the article notes, prediction markets are regulated by the CFTC as a commodities futures contract, so I&amp;#39;m not sure how any state law survives a federal pre-emption challenge. On the other hand, it&amp;#39;s a little unusual to see a federal agency suing to protect its turf. Would&amp;#39;ve expected a class action by a Minnesota user of the service to bring the challenge instead.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48199092&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m curious to see how this works out, because sports betting is _not_ in the CFTC&amp;#39;s remit, and Kalshi etc&amp;#39;s argument that states can&amp;#39;t regulate them because they&amp;#39;re not technically sports betting is contrary to the spirit of the law&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48199350&quot; title=&quot;There’s no “house” or “book” aspect to Kalshi. They are nothing more than contracts that are bought and sold between individuals.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue these markets are a &amp;#34;scourge&amp;#34; prone to insider trading and harmful real-world incentives, others contend they are functionally similar to the stock market or traditional trading exchanges &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48198484&quot; title=&quot;I wonder if it can really be enforced. It&amp;#39;s clear that prediction markets are a scourge -- there seems to be no upside whatsoever.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200148&quot; title=&quot;I think sports betting is a lot less harmful than prediction markets. With sports betting if someone throws a game to get a pay day, for instance, the only real consequence is on the reputation of the sport. In prediction markets, people can do all sorts of awful things to make money as insiders..&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48198762&quot; title=&quot;Isn&amp;#39;t the stock market a prediction market as well?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/antoinezambelli/forge&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Forge – Guardrails take an 8B model from 53% to 99% on agentic tasks&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48192383&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;681 points · 251 comments · by zambelli&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Forge is an open-source reliability layer that uses multi-layer guardrails to boost the accuracy of local 8B models on agentic tasks from 53% to 99%, allowing small models to outperform frontier APIs like Claude Sonnet in multi-step workflows. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/antoinezambelli/forge&quot; title=&quot;Hi HN, I&amp;amp;#x27;m Antoine Zambelli, AI Director at Texas Instruments.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;I built Forge, an open-source reliability layer for self-hosted LLM tool-calling.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;What it does:&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;- Adds domain-and-tool-agnostic guardrails (retry nudges, step enforcement, error recovery, VRAM-aware context management) to local models running on consumer hardware&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;- Takes an 8B model from ~53% to ~99% on multi-step agentic workflows without changing the model - just the system around it&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;- Ships with an eval harness and…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on how &amp;#34;guardrail&amp;#34; frameworks like Forge improve agentic performance by enforcing tool-call correctness and handling common failure modes, such as misinterpreting empty search results as tool errors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48201036&quot; title=&quot;The tool-call ambiguity point — yeah, I hit that at frontier scale too. Running Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini CLI in parallel for daily dev, the most common failure mode I see is grep/find returning exit code 1 (no matches): the model reads it as &amp;#39;the tool failed&amp;#39; instead of &amp;#39;search ran, here&amp;#39;s the negative space,&amp;#39; then either bails or retries with slightly different syntax instead of broadening the search. The retry-nudge layer maps almost 1:1 to what I do manually multiple times an hour:…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48198514&quot; title=&quot;So, this basically ensures that models call the right tools with the correct format?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While these harnesses allow small local models to rival frontier models on specific tasks, users noted that &amp;#34;effective attention&amp;#34; remains a bottleneck; larger models like Claude Opus still handle long-horizon tasks and massive context windows more reliably &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48201099&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s where frontier pulls ahead for sure, at least on the big frontier models - though I haven&amp;#39;t formalized those findings because...time. Necessary disclaimer, forge isn&amp;#39;t concerned, technically, with model quality, just execution of tool calls. Now for the actual answer... What I found to be the limiting factor with small models in the 14B range was &amp;#39;effective attention&amp;#39;. Beyond a certain point, still well within their training context window size, I start to see degradation. I don&amp;#39;t have…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48201194&quot; title=&quot;The &amp;#39;effective attention&amp;#39; framing nails what I keep noticing too. Sonnet&amp;#39;s official context is huge in principle, but in a real coding session where the agent is reading 30+ files, running grep, processing test output, emitting diffs — somewhere around 60-80k effective tokens I can feel it start to &amp;#39;skim&amp;#39; earlier context rather than reason over it. The thing it forgot isn&amp;#39;t out of window; it&amp;#39;s just not weighted highly enough anymore. The tool-call history collapse is a problem I&amp;#39;d pay real…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong consensus that managing message history—specifically through &amp;#34;compaction&amp;#34; or summarizing old tool responses—is essential for preventing context drift in extended agent sessions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48201036&quot; title=&quot;The tool-call ambiguity point — yeah, I hit that at frontier scale too. Running Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini CLI in parallel for daily dev, the most common failure mode I see is grep/find returning exit code 1 (no matches): the model reads it as &amp;#39;the tool failed&amp;#39; instead of &amp;#39;search ran, here&amp;#39;s the negative space,&amp;#39; then either bails or retries with slightly different syntax instead of broadening the search. The retry-nudge layer maps almost 1:1 to what I do manually multiple times an hour:…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48201099&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s where frontier pulls ahead for sure, at least on the big frontier models - though I haven&amp;#39;t formalized those findings because...time. Necessary disclaimer, forge isn&amp;#39;t concerned, technically, with model quality, just execution of tool calls. Now for the actual answer... What I found to be the limiting factor with small models in the 14B range was &amp;#39;effective attention&amp;#39;. Beyond a certain point, still well within their training context window size, I start to see degradation. I don&amp;#39;t have…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48201194&quot; title=&quot;The &amp;#39;effective attention&amp;#39; framing nails what I keep noticing too. Sonnet&amp;#39;s official context is huge in principle, but in a real coding session where the agent is reading 30+ files, running grep, processing test output, emitting diffs — somewhere around 60-80k effective tokens I can feel it start to &amp;#39;skim&amp;#39; earlier context rather than reason over it. The thing it forgot isn&amp;#39;t out of window; it&amp;#39;s just not weighted highly enough anymore. The tool-call history collapse is a problem I&amp;#39;d pay real…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, developers are increasingly viewing these control layers as &amp;#34;LLM middleware&amp;#34; that treats the infrastructure around the model as a first-class priority &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200359&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been saying for a while that given a proper harness, small local models can perform incredibly well. When you have a system that can try everything, it will eventually get it right as long as you can prevent it from getting it wrong in the meantime.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200304&quot; title=&quot;Funny timing. I’ve been building something adjacent, though from a different angle: not primarily local-model reliability, but a control layer around agent execution, tools, routing, and operator intent. I was calling these &amp;#39;synthetic models&amp;#39;, but decided yesterday &amp;#39;LLM middleware&amp;#39; is a clearer description. Very early prototype, so I’m looking more for architectural/conceptual reactions than polish: https://wardwright.dev / https://github.com/bglusman/wardwright The common thread I see is…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.autonocion.com/us/tesla-lithium-refinery-texas/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tesla&amp;#39;s lithium refinery discharges 231,000 gallons of polluted wastewater a day&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (autonocion.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48198551&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;497 points · 243 comments · by atombender&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An independent lab report found carcinogens and heavy metals in wastewater discharged from Tesla’s Texas lithium refinery, sparking a dispute with a local drainage district after the facility was marketed as an &amp;#34;acid-free clean process&amp;#34; that would only produce sand and limestone byproducts. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.autonocion.com/us/tesla-lithium-refinery-texas/&quot; title=&quot;A Texas Drainage District Walked Its Ditch on a Routine Inspection. They Found a Pipe They Didn&amp;#39;t Recognize Discharging Black Liquid From Tesla&amp;#39;s $1 Billion Lithium Refinery    The pipe belonged to Tesla. The dark liquid was wastewater from the company&amp;#39;s nearly $1 billion lithium refinery, which began operations in December 2024 and    [Skip to content](#content &amp;#39;Skip to content&amp;#39;)    ## Trending    TRENDING    * [General motors](https://www.autonocion.com/us/lithium-gmc-mine-nevada/)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Tesla maintains the discharge is fully permitted and legal &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48199168&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The permit, a Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System authorization known as TPDES, allowed up to 231,000 gallons of treated wastewater per day to be discharged into an unnamed ditch that flows into Petronila Creek and from there into Baffin Bay, a longtime South Texas saltwater fishing destination. Ok, so sounds like Tesla got the necessary legal provisions. &amp;gt; What it did not do, explicitly, was grant Tesla the right to use public or private property for wastewater conveyance. I&amp;#39;m…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48199103&quot; title=&quot;How is that a half truth? If you read the article it’s clear that this discharge is fully permitted and legal. All the substances they portray so shockingly were found at barely detectable levels. I read the whole article and I don’t really understand what is being criticized, if not manufacturing itself. Do people think it’s possible to make a massive battery factory with zero industrial waste water output? Or do they think factories should only be in poor countries where they won’t have to…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, critics point out that the lab report found hexavalent chromium and arsenic, neither of which are listed as allowable pollutants in the permit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48199252&quot; title=&quot;Not OP but, half truth is here &amp;#39;remains in complete compliance with all requirements of its state-issued wastewater discharge permit&amp;#39; and yet... &amp;#39;Neither hexavalent chromium nor arsenic appears in Tesla’s TCEQ discharge permit as an allowable pollutant.&amp;#39; Both which were found in the waste water. The original test did not test for those, so I guess what the guy was saying was true at a time?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users argue the levels are negligible, noting that arsenic levels were below federal drinking water standards and chromium was barely above reporting limits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48198685&quot; title=&quot;Obviously, discharging &amp;#39;dark and murky&amp;#39; polluted water is bad. But some of the figures from the lab report don&amp;#39;t seem that terrible: * Hexavalent chromium at 0.0104 milligrams per liter, just above the lab’s reporting limit of 0.01 mg/L. Hexavalent chromium is classified as a known human carcinogen by the US National Toxicology Program. It is the substance the Erin Brockovich case was built around. * Arsenic at 0.0025 mg/L. That is below the federal drinking water standard of 0.01 mg/L, but…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48199103&quot; title=&quot;How is that a half truth? If you read the article it’s clear that this discharge is fully permitted and legal. All the substances they portray so shockingly were found at barely detectable levels. I read the whole article and I don’t really understand what is being criticized, if not manufacturing itself. Do people think it’s possible to make a massive battery factory with zero industrial waste water output? Or do they think factories should only be in poor countries where they won’t have to…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others express concern over the long-term bioaccumulation of these toxins &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48198776&quot; title=&quot;So, it&amp;#39;s fine as long as it&amp;#39;s legal, then? How about when it enters the food chain and starts to accumulate? Will the elements say that &amp;#39;we&amp;#39;re under legal limits, and accumulate slowly, so we will act nice and don&amp;#39;t poison the organism we&amp;#39;re in?&amp;#39; Love that way of thinking.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; and debate whether the sampling methodology—conducted downstream rather than at the outfall—accurately reflects Tesla&amp;#39;s specific contribution to the ditch&amp;#39;s pollution &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48199168&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The permit, a Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System authorization known as TPDES, allowed up to 231,000 gallons of treated wastewater per day to be discharged into an unnamed ditch that flows into Petronila Creek and from there into Baffin Bay, a longtime South Texas saltwater fishing destination. Ok, so sounds like Tesla got the necessary legal provisions. &amp;gt; What it did not do, explicitly, was grant Tesla the right to use public or private property for wastewater conveyance. I&amp;#39;m…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://superspl.at/scene/84df8849&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Gaussian Splat of a Strawberry&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (superspl.at)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48191602&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;528 points · 200 comments · by danybittel&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer shared a 3D Gaussian Splat reconstruction of a strawberry, providing images of the physical camera and lighting setup used to capture the scene. &lt;a href=&quot;https://superspl.at/scene/84df8849&quot; title=&quot;The Setup:&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;i.imgur.com&amp;amp;#x2F;o0hgybh.jpeg&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;i.imgur.com&amp;amp;#x2F;o0hgybh.jpeg&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;i.imgur.com&amp;amp;#x2F;mcNiomp.jpeg&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;i.imgur.com&amp;amp;#x2F;mcNiomp.jpeg&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;i.imgur.com&amp;amp;#x2F;vIjw6pc.jpeg&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;i.imgur.com&amp;amp;#x2F;vIjw6pc.jpeg&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;i.imgur.com&amp;amp;#x2F;nzOwmSC.jpeg&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gaussian splatting is praised for its high performance on mobile devices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48193017&quot; title=&quot;It’s amazing this runs perfectly smooth on my iPhone 12 mini That is indeed a very cool scene being about to wander around and still have decent resolution&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt; and its &amp;#34;dreamy&amp;#34; aesthetic, where detail degrades into a blurry, impressionistic style rather than a hard cutoff &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48192077&quot; title=&quot;Beautiful. What I love about gaussian splats is the way they degrade - instead of a hard cutoff or LoD changing spheres into cubes etc., they get increasingly &amp;#39;dreamy&amp;#39; - the basic idea is still there, just less detailed. Take for example this scene: https://superspl.at/scene/e721ea7c If you navigate closer to the trees, things around you become blurry - as if the very fabric of reality unraveled.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While users are impressed by the visual fidelity of these 3D reconstructions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48192089&quot; title=&quot;Wow this is a time killer... ended up here: https://superspl.at/scene/ff1d0393 beautiful!&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48192067&quot; title=&quot;I read [1], but I still don&amp;#39;t quite know what I&amp;#39;m looking at. My guess is a 3D model reconstructed from lots of detailed pictures? [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_splatting&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, some note technical limitations such as missing geometry on the underside of objects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48191792&quot; title=&quot;What happened to the bottom of that poor strawberry?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. A major point of debate is whether splats can eventually support dynamic animation like traditional polygon meshes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48193712&quot; title=&quot;Ah the timeless joy of falling through the floor geometry. Seriously though - it&amp;#39;s breathtaking. The first guy who figures out the bridge between splats and dynamism - animation, editing, responsiveness - is going to be one of the immortals of 3d design.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48194322&quot; title=&quot;There are many ways to represent 3D data, but animations really only work properly with polygon meshes (e.g. triangle surface meshes or volumetric tetrahedral meshes).&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, or if they will be superseded by AI-driven generation and Neural Radiance Fields (NeRFs) &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48193388&quot; title=&quot;I know feelings about AI are mixed.  But when AI can dream up gaussian splats in real time, from a prompt, and do refinement as you get closer to things...  That&amp;#39;s going to be pretty bonkers.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48193509&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s kinda what NERFs are (neural radience fields). They actually preceeded this Gaussian story, with Gaussians coming in and outperforming them. Maybe they&amp;#39;ll merge later for something even better, I don&amp;#39;t know enough about them.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48193789&quot; title=&quot;Also interesting: https://github.com/apple/ml-sharp Apples model to generate Gaussian splats from a single image. Takes about 30 seconds on an M1 Pro. It falls apart once you move too much, but for a little side-wiggling or a second-eye view for VR, it&amp;#39;s great. And looks a lot better than the old approach of depth map + vertex shaders that I use in https://github.com/combatwombat/tiefling . But ml-sharp has 2.6 GB weights, a bit too big to run in the browser.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.openbsd.org/79.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OpenBSD 7.9&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (openbsd.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48192882&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;416 points · 307 comments · by bradley_taunt&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenBSD 7.9, the project&amp;#39;s 60th release, introduces a CPU scheduler mechanism for managing cores of varying speeds, delayed hibernation support, and 802.11ax wireless capabilities. It also features significant SMP improvements, kernel updates for various architectures, and security enhancements to the `pledge` and `unveil` system calls. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.openbsd.org/79.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: OpenBSD 7.9    URL Source: https://www.openbsd.org/79.html    Published Time: Tue, 19 May 2026 13:29:23 GMT    Markdown Content:  [![Image 1: PinkPuffy](https://www.openbsd.org/images/PinkPuffy-s.gif)](https://www.openbsd.org/images/PinkPuffy.png)Released May 19, 2026. (60th OpenBSD release) Copyright 1997-2026, Theo de Raadt. 7.9 Song: &amp;#39;[Diamond in the Rough](https://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html#79)&amp;#39; Artwork by Lyra Henderson. * See the information on [the FTP…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Proponents argue that OpenBSD’s decades-long focus on security and stability makes it a superior alternative to Linux for servers, mail, and repurposing older hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48193450&quot; title=&quot;With all the security issues constantly being uncovered in other Operating Systems - which will only accelerate with Ai - it’s time everyone considers OpenBSD. Their decades-long security-focus is second to none. We have fully converted from Ubuntu/Debian to OpenBSD. No looking back.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48193518&quot; title=&quot;We use OpenBSD for our VPSes on Hetzner, bare metal (for security focussed clients) and older (but still good) hardware in our Home Lab. OpenBSD is excellent on older (no longer supported by Cupertino) Apple hardware. We have an Intel Mac Mini Cluster with near-perfect uptime. If you need to run any kind of server (Web, Mail, DNS, NFS, Database) where you need stability &amp;amp; security, look no further.  Some learning curve, but totally worth it.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users question if there is empirical data to prove it is more secure than Linux &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48194509&quot; title=&quot;Is OpenBSD actually more secure than Linux? I have not been able to find any data to support this—only some vague opinions.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that its security-first philosophy distinguishes it from FreeBSD’s focus on compatibility and NetBSD’s focus on portability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48193244&quot; title=&quot;BSDs are interesting projects. As I understand it there&amp;#39;s a broad difference of them all doing things reasonably well but a) Free is general-purpose, b) Net is especially portable/many architecture and Open is security focused&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48193812&quot; title=&quot;FreeBSD has the same roots as OpenBSD but the former has a “compatibility” focus whereas the latter has the security focus.  Having a background in security, the choice was obvious for me. But each person/org should decide based on their needs.  Haven’t had any issues running it on all major hardware (Dell, HP, Lenovo, Apple, etc) the UI isn’t as pretty as macOS on Desktop, but it runs Firefox &amp;amp; Chrome, etc. so you can do everything you need.   If you have an older Lenovo or Mac lying around…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that its smaller market share results in fewer eyes on the code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48193687&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;it’s time everyone considers OpenBSD https://x.com/ortegaalfredo/status/2055362910415671459 When your super secure feature gets defeated by a symlink maybe it&amp;#39;s not really time to consider it... Sure, things are not better in the linux world but at least there&amp;#39;s more eyes to fix issues there just because of the market share.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, leading to debates over whether reported vulnerabilities are significant or merely &amp;#34;security researcher theatrics&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48193797&quot; title=&quot;Your &amp;#39;evidence&amp;#39; for him to reconsider is a sandbox &amp;#39;bypass&amp;#39; that requires you to be root to set up the environment? For my next trick I will demonstrate how to break into my own house to open the blinds by using my keys. Security researcher theatrics will never not be funny.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.natesilver.net/p/disney-erased-fivethirtyeight&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Disney erased FiveThirtyEight&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (natesilver.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48197703&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;456 points · 260 comments · by 7777777phil&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nate Silver reports that Disney has effectively erased the FiveThirtyEight archive, redirecting links to ABC News after years of mismanagement and neglect. Silver criticizes the company for failing to monetize the site through subscriptions and for deleting approximately 200,000 person-hours of work following the brand&amp;#39;s 2025 shutdown. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.natesilver.net/p/disney-erased-fivethirtyeight&quot; title=&quot;Title: Disney erased FiveThirtyEight    URL Source: https://www.natesilver.net/p/disney-erased-fivethirtyeight    Published Time: 2026-05-19T18:37:47+00:00    Markdown Content:  [![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The decline of FiveThirtyEight is largely attributed to a loss of public trust following the 2016 election, with some users arguing the site failed its primary job of providing clear insight &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48199020&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I did too much bragging in the media and didn’t anticipate the extent to which public opinion toward FiveThirtyEight would shift once we became a corporate-backed incumbent rather than an eccentric upstart Can’t speak for everyone else, but it wasn’t this for me. It was about 2016 presidential that lost me. He tries to justify this later about how theirs was better than other outlets but I don’t care. Call it emotional, naive, unfair or whatever you want, but regardless I had zero interest in…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48199506&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand why this is surprising. People didn&amp;#39;t go to FiveThirtyEight to marvel the science behind it. The science was just supposed to give you what you came there for: the actual election results. In the end, it turned out that predicting elections is still very hard, and that for all the fanfare, FiveThirtyEight performed only slightly better than what you could find in any other reputable newspaper, so it kinda lost its appeal.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others defend the site’s statistical integrity, noting that a 30% probability for a Trump victory was a reasonable reflection of uncertainty compared to other outlets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48199164&quot; title=&quot;I had complaints about 538, especially the early days, but don&amp;#39;t understand this critique at all. A 30% chance hitting is completely unremarkable, and it was a perfectly reasonable reading of the evidence at the time. Nate isn&amp;#39;t wrong that conventional wisdom was way off, with even supposedly statistical models giving Hillary a 99% chance of winning. Elections, like many things, have some inherent uncertainty. A several point polling error is normal, so a candidate who is down a couple points…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48199078&quot; title=&quot;Because they said trump only had a 30% chance to win? What if they had said 49%? Would that have made their prediction worthless?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights the pitfalls of corporate acquisitions, where leadership changes often lead to the dismantling of successful projects for political or &amp;#34;careerist&amp;#34; reasons &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200295&quot; title=&quot;At this point in my life I have zero patience or sympathy for the story of a man selling his company to a massive conglomerate and then feeling betrayed or somehow sad/regretful when said conglomerate destroys it or weaponizes it.  I&amp;#39;m simply tired of this hindsight virtue signaling.  They don&amp;#39;t care about us.  That means even you, Nate Silver.  Btw was a big fan back then!  Signal and the Noise was a great book.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48198627&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;The Times was also in the midst of a leadership transition, and new management tends to want to move on from the old regime’s pet projects, even if they were successful. Learning about B2B sales over the years, the size of this leadership-change factor has been among the most eye-opening (and among the most disappointing). It cuts both ways: You can have a successful pilot that doesn&amp;#39;t proceed because this-or-that VP was replaced, and to show off their bold new direction, the new VP cancels…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48198601&quot; title=&quot;Some of Disney’s most valuable properties—ESPN, Pixar, Marvel, Star Wars—were acquired. FiveThirtyEight may be smaller, but it should be in Disney’s self-interest to set things right and earn a reputation for being a good home for acquisitions.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://safedep.io/mini-shai-hulud-strikes-again-314-npm-packages-compromised/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mini Shai-Hulud Strikes Again: 314 npm Packages Compromised&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (safedep.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48189368&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;389 points · 310 comments · by theanonymousone&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On May 19, 2026, a compromised npm account published 637 malicious versions of 317 packages, including high-traffic libraries like `size-sensor` and `echarts-for-react`, to harvest cloud credentials, hijack AI coding agents, and establish persistent backdoors across developer environments and CI/CD pipelines. &lt;a href=&quot;https://safedep.io/mini-shai-hulud-strikes-again-314-npm-packages-compromised/&quot; title=&quot;Mini Shai-Hulud Strikes Again: 317 npm Packages Compromised    A compromised npm maintainer account published 637 malicious versions across 317 packages including size-sensor, echarts-for-react, timeago.js, and hundreds of @antv scoped packages, affecting 15M+ monthly downloads.    ![Live Wave Icon](/_astro/live-wave-icon.CPh0SABh_Z2e16z7.svg) [New Blog: Mini Shai-Hulud Strikes Again: 314 npm Packages…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a growing alarm over npm&amp;#39;s susceptibility to supply chain attacks, specifically due to its ability to execute code during installation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48196107&quot; title=&quot;Is there anything about npm that makes it particularly susceptible to these attacks, other than the fact that it&amp;#39;s the most popular package manager of all?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48196343&quot; title=&quot;npm can execute code after install and most package managers don&amp;#39;t do that&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users advocate for isolating development environments in containers or VMs, others warn that Docker is not a strong security boundary and that sophisticated payloads are already designed to escape containers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48190903&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Docker Container Escape &amp;gt; The payload checks for the Docker socket and, if present, attempts container escape through three sequential methods: So even if you&amp;#39;re running devcontainers / VMs, these worms are already trying to escape. Make sure you&amp;#39;re running a rootless VM engine (e.g. podman instead of docker) !&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48190909&quot; title=&quot;how do containers solve the problem? if they are connected to the internet (and they are) you have got the same problem, if the credentials can be read by the container, at least to my understanding&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48192194&quot; title=&quot;Despite what some people will tell you (including many in the security indistry), Docker is not a strong security boundary, and it should not be treated as one. It shares a kernel with the running system. It reminds me of the good old days when people would hand out low privilege Linux accounts and rely on the kernel to prevent privilige escalation. Docker is literally the same thing, just with extra steps. Especially today with new kernel LPE&amp;#39;S dropping every 5 minutes. Yes, Podman is a bit…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a cynical consensus that the JavaScript community is uniquely plagued by these issues, leading some developers to mitigate risk by avoiding server-side JS entirely or implementing long &amp;#34;cooldown&amp;#34; periods before updating packages &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48191812&quot; title=&quot;‘No way to prevent this’, Says Only Development Community Where This Regularly Happens ­— &amp;lt; https://itnext.io/no-way-to-prevent-this-says-only-developme... &amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48196019&quot; title=&quot;“No way to prevent this” says only package manager where this regularly happens.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48193385&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m very glad I never bought into fullstack JS/TS. My JS is frontend only, served as a compiled bundle off a server that doesn&amp;#39;t even have a JS runtime of its own. Whatever random vulnerabilities the frontend contains are limited in blast radius to the user&amp;#39;s own browser, and since all frontends should be untrusted anyway, there is no real security risk to the server or backend. No reason to update more than a few times a year, if that. Combine with obvious basic security practices like pnpm…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://krebsonsecurity.com/2026/05/cisa-admin-leaked-aws-govcloud-keys-on-github/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;CISA Admin Leaked AWS GovCloud Keys on GitHub&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (krebsonsecurity.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48190454&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;476 points · 183 comments · by LelouBil&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A contractor for the Cybersecurity &amp;amp; Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) accidentally exposed administrative AWS GovCloud keys and plaintext passwords for internal systems on a public GitHub repository. Security experts describe the incident as one of the most significant government data leaks in recent history. &lt;a href=&quot;https://krebsonsecurity.com/2026/05/cisa-admin-leaked-aws-govcloud-keys-on-github/&quot; title=&quot;Title: CISA Admin Leaked AWS GovCloud Keys on Github    URL Source: https://krebsonsecurity.com/2026/05/cisa-admin-leaked-aws-govcloud-keys-on-github/    Markdown Content:  # CISA Admin Leaked AWS GovCloud Keys on Github – Krebs on Security    Advertisement    [![Image 3](https://krebsonsecurity.com/b-doppel/13.png)](https://www.doppel.com/?utm_source=krebsonsecurity&amp;amp;utm_medium=display&amp;amp;utm_campaign=fy27brandcampaign&amp;amp;utm_content=deepfake)    Advertisement    [![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The leak of AWS GovCloud keys and a plaintext &amp;#34;passwords.csv&amp;#34; file by a CISA contractor is widely condemned as &amp;#34;gross negligence&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;inexcusable incompetence,&amp;#34; especially given the failure to respond to initial vulnerability notifications &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48194131&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Valadon said he reached out because the owner in this case wasn’t responding and the information exposed was highly sensitive. obviously leaking the credentials itself is crazy, given that its (a contractor to) CISA, but to not respond when notified? crazy crazy. but wait! it gets worse somehow &amp;#39; “AWS-Workspace-Firefox-Passwords.csv” — listed plaintext usernames and passwords for dozens of internal CISA systems &amp;#39; while i understand and sympathize with the fact that CISA is kind of being…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48194376&quot; title=&quot;The word you&amp;#39;re looking for is &amp;#39;gross negligence&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48195191&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, but the words gross negligence is legal for you&amp;#39;re going to be sued for a whole lot of money.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters attribute the incident to a lack of formal security training and the absence of robust shared credential management solutions, while some suggest that current political pressures on the agency may be exacerbating such failures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48194131&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Valadon said he reached out because the owner in this case wasn’t responding and the information exposed was highly sensitive. obviously leaking the credentials itself is crazy, given that its (a contractor to) CISA, but to not respond when notified? crazy crazy. but wait! it gets worse somehow &amp;#39; “AWS-Workspace-Firefox-Passwords.csv” — listed plaintext usernames and passwords for dozens of internal CISA systems &amp;#39; while i understand and sympathize with the fact that CISA is kind of being…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48195474&quot; title=&quot;While I agree that it should not have happened, at the same time its probably true that most people are never formally trained on security. The real story here is a big gap in existing implementations where shared credentials are needed and used pretty much across all the systems but there are no good solutions for managing such use cases. People are naturally more sensitive about their personal secrets than something thats shared across the company/group&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48194937&quot; title=&quot;DOGE. It&amp;#39;s DOGE. This is just things going according to plan for people that think the US government is too powerful or that there is a fortune to be made in stealing public sector resources and privatizing them. It is a bad plan that has and will continue to harm people, but it is intentional.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. To prevent future leaks, participants advocate for rotating secrets into secure vaults and transitioning away from static API keys toward more modern authentication methods &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48193806&quot; title=&quot;I think one thing that people are sleeping on is passing a ton of secrets to OpenAI and Anthropic or your OpenRouter by having a .env or secrets on disk in your repo, but not checked in Your LLM will happily read the entire file, ship it off to be training data for future versions of ChatGPT, and not raise any flags, because let&amp;#39;s be fair it was on ok thing to check if all the env vars were set, or it you had set up the database password for the app. It&amp;#39;s time for orgs to audit and rotate…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48194125&quot; title=&quot;Yet another argument for the death of the API key. Replacements abound; let&amp;#39;s get on with it.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/wiltodelta/remove-ai-watermarks&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Remove-AI-Watermarks – CLI and library for removing AI watermarks from images&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200569&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;385 points · 258 comments · by janalsncm&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Remove-AI-Watermarks is a CLI tool and library that strips visible logos, invisible frequency-domain patterns like SynthID, and AI-related metadata from images. It uses reverse alpha blending and diffusion-based regeneration to bypass &amp;#34;Made with AI&amp;#34; labels on social platforms while offering face protection to prevent distortion. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/wiltodelta/remove-ai-watermarks&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - wiltodelta/remove-ai-watermarks: CLI and library for removing visible (Gemini) and invisible (SynthID, C2PA, EXIF) AI watermarks from images    URL Source: https://github.com/wiltodelta/remove-ai-watermarks    Markdown Content:  Remove **visible** and **invisible** AI watermarks from images generated by Google Gemini (Nano Banana), ChatGPT / DALL-E, Stable Diffusion, Adobe Firefly, Midjourney, and other AI models.    Strips SynthID, C2PA Content Credentials, EXIF/XMP &amp;#39;Made with AI&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the tension between privacy and the &amp;#34;hacker ethos,&amp;#34; with some arguing that watermarks act as digital barcodes that should be resisted &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200799&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s an underappreciated comment in the other thread about SynthID and OpenAI [0] that captures what (IMO) the hacker ethos on this should be. We care about privacy, we should not accept tools that barcode our every digital move. (note that the counter of &amp;#39;well, they don&amp;#39;t do that yet &amp;#39; is not particularly convincing) [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200060&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend that bypassing them accelerates the destruction of objective truth &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200894&quot; title=&quot;Accepting blindly destroying the concept of thruth should not be the hacker ethos either.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48201068&quot; title=&quot;Stalin had all the resources imaginables at his disposal. Now Nancy, a tech-phobic waitress who has a grudge against her coworker can make up an entire scenario with one prompt and her colleagues might blindly believe her. Let&amp;#39;s not pretend they&amp;#39;re the same thing. Gen AI is inevitable. Watermarking is likely futile. But in my opinion it is still very important to discuss how, as a society, we&amp;#39;re going to live in a post-truth world now that anybody can, IN SECONDS, not only fabricate a story but…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics point out that this specific tool&amp;#39;s effectiveness is limited, as removing robust invisible watermarks like SynthID currently requires destructive regeneration that compromises image quality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200752&quot; title=&quot;This is a bit misleading as for Gemini it only properly removes the visible watermark. To remove SynthID it has to regenerate the image at low noise with SDXL, which will likely destroy a lot of small details, plus won&amp;#39;t work for higher res properly (NB2 and GPT Image 2 support up to 4K image outputs)&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some believe corporate &amp;#34;arms races&amp;#34; will eventually defeat such tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200847&quot; title=&quot;Building a tool that tries (and probably fails) to remove the watermark (due to the arms race that large corporate machines will win) is tacitly accepting the barcode. The hacker ethos should be, first and foremost, to run open source models locally without relying on a corporation.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that historical precedents like piracy suggest that decentralized efforts will continue to undermine corporate control &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48202133&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;due to the arms race that large corporate machines will win Much like how the entirety of Hollywood, book publishers, academic publishers, and game developers have won against piracy despite being some of the largest corps on earth and dedicating untold billions to the issue over the past 30 years?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://developers.googleblog.com/an-important-update-transitioning-gemini-cli-to-antigravity-cli/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Gemini CLI will stop working from June 18, 2026&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (developers.googleblog.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48196867&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;404 points · 210 comments · by primaprashant&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google is transitioning Gemini CLI and Gemini Code Assist to the new agent-first Antigravity CLI, with services for individual and free users set to end on June 18, 2026, while enterprise support remains unchanged. &lt;a href=&quot;https://developers.googleblog.com/an-important-update-transitioning-gemini-cli-to-antigravity-cli/&quot; title=&quot;Title: An important update: Transitioning Gemini CLI to Antigravity CLI    URL Source: https://developers.googleblog.com/an-important-update-transitioning-gemini-cli-to-antigravity-cli/    Published Time: 2026-05-19    Markdown Content:  MAY 19, 2026    When we shipped Gemini CLI last year, our goal was to bring the magic of Gemini directly into your terminal. Along the way, we’ve learned a lot from our community of millions of users, with over 100,000 GitHub stars, 6,000 merged pull requests, and…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The decision to deprecate the Gemini CLI in favor of &amp;#34;Antigravity&amp;#34; is viewed by many as another example of Google’s internal re-orgs damaging developer trust and brand recognition &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48203833&quot; title=&quot;How does anyone internally at Google justify these decisions? Even if there are competing implementations, in terms of brand recognition, I feel like “Gemini” is more closely associated with Google than “Antigravity”. Why pick the more obscure option?! Perhaps they felt the sentiment on Gemini CLI was beyond repair, but surely there must be some voice on the inside saying “developers will never adopt our products if we keep killing them”.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48201329&quot; title=&quot;Google really can’t help themselves but to have some internal re-org kill off a public thing people are actively using. It’s honestly impressive how consistent they are.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48202136&quot; title=&quot;Whoever is in charge of these decisions, is absolutely disconnected with the reality. First they sent a message saying the Ultra plan is ending, with no other option for a Workspace use to buy an equivalent plan. It was suppose to be active tilll June or July 7 , that&amp;#39;s all. So the users are not suppose to know how they will need to plan or budget and just guess. I read once that after a certain level , the managers need to make their own decisions. Seems like someone just came in and decided…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the move unifies billing and supports a broader range of models beyond just Gemini &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48204615&quot; title=&quot;By unifying the billing and quota systems, as well as providing better integration, I presume The Antigravity harness is by far better than the gemini-cli one. Antigravity also offers models other than Gemini as well. When you say Antigravity, you think of a platform whereas when you say Gemini you think of the model It&amp;#39;s great that gemini-cli is open-source, but that also comes with a bunch of ai-generated issues and pull-requests, which is sure to impede development&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest the tool likely suffered from low telemetry and &amp;#34;AI-generated&amp;#34; maintenance overhead &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48204615&quot; title=&quot;By unifying the billing and quota systems, as well as providing better integration, I presume The Antigravity harness is by far better than the gemini-cli one. Antigravity also offers models other than Gemini as well. When you say Antigravity, you think of a platform whereas when you say Gemini you think of the model It&amp;#39;s great that gemini-cli is open-source, but that also comes with a bunch of ai-generated issues and pull-requests, which is sure to impede development&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48202828&quot; title=&quot;What if their telemetry shows very low usage? I&amp;#39;ve seen virtually no discussion of Gemini CLI online.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. The consensus reflects a deep frustration with Google&amp;#39;s perceived &amp;#34;monkey knife fight&amp;#34; product strategy, where internal competition and manager incentives often override the needs of external users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48202825&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Whoever is in charge of these decisions, is absolutely disconnected with the reality. The problem is with your perception of reality. Google doesn&amp;#39;t operate for the outside, you&amp;#39;re on the outside, Google operates for Google and people in Google care about themselves first, then Google, and then -- if t all, outside.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48206719&quot; title=&quot;I saw someone in a different thread describe Google product/tool strategy as a:  “monkey knife fight” And tbh I can’t really argue with that.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48206756&quot; title=&quot;Reminds me of the Microsoft days circa 2010 when Microsoft published half a dozen media players (Zune!), word processors, email clients, etc.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/kindle-loyalists-scramble-amazon-turns-page-old-e-readers-2026-05-19/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Kindle loyalists scramble as Amazon turns page on old e-readers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (reuters.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48194645&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;225 points · &lt;strong&gt;297 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by cf100clunk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/kindle-loyalists-scramble-amazon-turns-page-old-e-readers-2026-05-19/&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users praise Amazon for providing 14 years of support for legacy devices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48252474&quot; title=&quot;14 years of support for a device is pretty incredible.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that Kindles should be treated as long-lasting appliances rather than disposable tech, suggesting that Amazon could maintain basic book-delivery APIs indefinitely &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48252779&quot; title=&quot;I don’t know how I feel about it. I’ve been on one side, looking at usage numbers of older iOS versions, and arguing that low single digit percentages were fine to stop supporting with the new version. On the other hand, I view my kindle as an appliance, and I don’t need it to have updated functionality. I think this is true of many electronics: digital cameras, printers, misc USB peripherals, etc. I believe Amazon could easily support the APIs it uses, and keep delivering me books that I’ve…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48253223&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m supporting a 30 year old product, the oldest one in the field are 20+ years old, we still support them. I&amp;#39;m just in the process of developing a lifecycle policy, being able to cut off support for a 12 year systems would make my life much more full of joy.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant point of contention is Amazon&amp;#39;s design direction; enthusiasts lament the loss of physical page-turn buttons and the Oasis model, while others argue that the silent majority of users are satisfied with the current affordable, high-endurance devices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48246176&quot; title=&quot;Amazon&amp;#39;s attitude towards its Kindle device customers is one of lofty disregard. Every time they announce new Kindle products, half of the comments are like &amp;#39;I hope they have buttons,&amp;#39; &amp;#39;I hope they bring back the Oasis,&amp;#39; etc. But they appear to exult in dashing the hopes of their customers, or at the very least they don&amp;#39;t care about them at all.  They&amp;#39;ve doubled down on no-key devices with stupid pens, pointless and poorly-implemented color, and tiny or excessively large form factors with…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48252051&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Every time they announce new Kindle products, half of the comments are like &amp;#39;I hope they have buttons,&amp;#39; &amp;#39;I hope they bring back the Oasis,&amp;#39; etc. WWII fighter plane with red spots on it dot gif. The vast majority of people who buy Kindles simply read books on them and don’t repeatedly cry online about features that are never coming back. I’ve bought about 10 of the things dating back to 2012 either because I wanted to have the latest model or because I wanted to give one as a gift. They are…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48253864&quot; title=&quot;The reason people complain is because the old kindles used to have buttons, and honestly the touch screen is really fucking janky if you&amp;#39;re used to the page turning buttons of the kindle 4, or the onscreen keyboard is janky if you&amp;#39;re used to the kindle 3g. And the sad part is that there&amp;#39;s no best of both. You can&amp;#39;t get a kindle paperwhite with buttons.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics also note that recent &amp;#34;innovations&amp;#34; feel like regressions, such as the introduction of paid ad-removal and the transition from physical keyboards to &amp;#34;janky&amp;#34; touchscreens &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48245769&quot; title=&quot;Having used an early kindle and a recent kindle, they are incredibly similar. One of the main innovations of the new models appears to be adverts you have to pay to get rid of.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48253864&quot; title=&quot;The reason people complain is because the old kindles used to have buttons, and honestly the touch screen is really fucking janky if you&amp;#39;re used to the page turning buttons of the kindle 4, or the onscreen keyboard is janky if you&amp;#39;re used to the kindle 3g. And the sad part is that there&amp;#39;s no best of both. You can&amp;#39;t get a kindle paperwhite with buttons.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openai.com/index/advancing-content-provenance/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OpenAI Adopts Google&amp;#39;s SynthID Watermark for AI Images with Verification Tool&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (openai.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48198291&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;332 points · 180 comments · by smooke&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI is enhancing content transparency by integrating Google DeepMind’s SynthID watermarking into its AI-generated images and achieving C2PA conformance. The company also launched a public verification tool to help users identify if media was created using ChatGPT, Codex, or the OpenAI API. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openai.com/index/advancing-content-provenance/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Advancing content provenance for a safer, more transparent AI ecosystem    URL Source: https://openai.com/index/advancing-content-provenance/    Markdown Content:  People are using OpenAI’s tools everyday to create and edit images and audio in ways that make communication more expressive, useful, and accessible. As these tools become a part of how people build, imagine, and share, it’s important that people can understand and verify where the media comes from so they can interpret it with…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Critics argue that SynthID is &amp;#34;performative nonsense&amp;#34; and a form of &amp;#34;DRM glorp&amp;#34; that can be easily bypassed through pixel masking or simple image transformations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200126&quot; title=&quot;This is just performative nonsense. As someone that creates things with tools with different media I would just hard avoid this tool that adds... arbitrary metadata not of my choosing. Should I seriously make a texture for a videogame with this weird DRM glorp in it? How old is photoshop and why is it exempt?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48198825&quot; title=&quot;Aren&amp;#39;t these kinds of watermarks easy to remove or distort?  Seems like they&amp;#39;re only helpful as long as people are relying on them sparingly so it&amp;#39;s not worth the effort to circumvent. If social media platforms started banning images with these watermarks seems like they&amp;#39;d be stripped out overnight.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200911&quot; title=&quot;if you tell it to generate the AI image with a black background you can visually see the synthid with a good enough monitor, it&amp;#39;s just a repeating fuzzy pattern, nothing special. I have found great success of getting rid of it by masking every 2nd pixel, regenerating missing pixels and then once again masking every 2nd pixel offset by 1. Used an off the shelf model to fill in the pixels, but I also exported a depthmap first (before any alternations) and denoised it so generated masked pixels…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see the tool as a helpful deterrent against lazy actors in the current landscape, others warn it represents a &amp;#34;1984&amp;#34; style shift toward authoritarian surveillance and the erosion of digital privacy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200637&quot; title=&quot;This is very similar to audiowmark https://github.com/swesterfeld/audiowmark You can stuff per-item database unique IDs, user IDs, geohashes, and other nefarious things inside. We need to protest this LOUDLY. Our devices are being locked down, we&amp;#39;re having attestation and trusted computing forced on us, the internet all over the world is undergoing age verification with full ID verification. Just because this is on &amp;#39;ai images&amp;#39; today doesn&amp;#39;t mean it won&amp;#39;t be on all images - screenshots, your…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48199520&quot; title=&quot;It helps significantly in the current moment. A lot of people are lazy and are getting caught quickly by SynthID. Eventually it won’t matter when image generation is cheap. But few self-host today and few are willing to pay unsubsidized prices, so the vast majority are using the Gemini, OpenAI, and Midjourney. If all 3 adopted SynthID, only a small fraction would use something else.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200060&quot; title=&quot;These systems should be removed. This is antithetical to freedom and privacy. There should be no way for anyone to track down who posted a political meme, anti-religious message, or any other legally protected speech. This will come back to bite us in the ass if we keep building it. Soon every image or communication we make will be watermarked if we continue to let this shit seep into the commons. Everything from your phone photos, to your screenshots, to your social media posts. One day soon…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also technical curiosity regarding the watermark&amp;#39;s payload capacity and whether it could eventually function as a &amp;#34;nutritional label&amp;#34; for synthetic content &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48199400&quot; title=&quot;What information is included in the metadata or SynthID? How many bits can be encoded in a SynthID? Can it be used to create something like nutritional labels for synthetic content? 10% synthetic text, 30 synthetic images. Your reality was 15% synthetic today (75% mega corp, 25% open-weight neocloud).&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200194&quot; title=&quot;I guess the SynthID-Image paper from Oct 2025[0] was an encoder-decoder for which they tested checking a flag or a 136 bit payload in 512x512 images and the watermark&amp;#39;s robustness after various transformations. Presumably the deployed version is meaningfully different. [0]: https://arxiv.org/html/2510.09263v1&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://deepmind.google/models/gemini-omni/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Gemini Omni&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (deepmind.google)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48196609&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;322 points · 146 comments · by meetpateltech&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google DeepMind has introduced Gemini Omni, a multimodal AI model that allows users to create and edit high-quality videos through natural, step-by-step conversations and diverse reference inputs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://deepmind.google/models/gemini-omni/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Gemini Omni    URL Source: https://deepmind.google/models/gemini-omni/    Markdown Content:  # Gemini Omni — Google DeepMind    [Skip to main content](https://deepmind.google/models/gemini-omni/#page-content)    ## Explore our next generation AI systems    [Explore models](https://deepmind.google/models/)    Gemini    [![Image 1](https://storage.googleapis.com/gdm-deepmind-com-prod-public/media/original_images/nav__dm__gemini__large.svg) Gemini Build intelligent…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rapid advancement of AI video has sparked a debate over its impact on Hollywood, with some predicting massive disruption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48196731&quot; title=&quot;I think Hollywood is in for a rough era. The disruption is happening at break neck speeds.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; while others argue that the industry&amp;#39;s current decline is due to a lack of original storytelling rather than a lack of technology &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48197784&quot; title=&quot;Hollywood is already in a rough era but it’s because they can’t create original human stories any more. This tech won’t change anything.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48197999&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, during most blockbuster movies lately all I can think is: &amp;#39;All pixels, no plot.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a growing sense of &amp;#34;AI fatigue&amp;#34; among enthusiasts who find generated visuals increasingly sterile and unimpressive compared to human-made content &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48198095&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m an AI optimist.  But AI video is probably the one thing that does depress me.  Seeing that we can make anything visually, there&amp;#39;s nothing that impresses me visually.  I watch a video that two years ago I would&amp;#39;ve thought was really cool, and now my first thought is, &amp;#39;Yawn, is this AI?&amp;#39;. Video, more than anything else, is the place where I really care if something is AI or not.  If I could get a TikTok that had no AI usage -- I&amp;#39;d be in.  Which is weird for me, because I&amp;#39;m typically the guy…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48197979&quot; title=&quot;you would watch a movie generated with the sterility of an LLM?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Technically, the models still struggle with complex physical simulations like rigid body contact, often resulting in morphing or disappearing objects that reassure specialists their roles remain secure for now &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48198271&quot; title=&quot;In my day job I program rigid body behaviour in real time amongst other simulations.   I think rigid body contact is hard to learn as it is inherently discontinuous.. something you discover when trying to code a solver. As such I always use this prompt as a test:  &amp;#39;A video of a jenga brick tower falling over as a brick is removed. The physics of each brick must be realistic.&amp;#39; It gave me a video of where bricks suddenly disapper or morph into others[1]. The linked video is after 2-3 iterations of…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.emmi.ai/news/mistral-ai-acquires-emmi-ai&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mistral AI acquires Emmi AI&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (emmi.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48197995&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;337 points · 98 comments · by doener&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mistral AI has acquired Emmi AI to integrate its physics-based AI models into a specialized stack for industrial engineering, bringing Emmi’s team of researchers and a new office in Linz, Austria, to the European AI leader. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.emmi.ai/news/mistral-ai-acquires-emmi-ai&quot; title=&quot;[Emmi AI Joins Mistral AI to Redefine Manufacturing and Industrial Engineering.Read More    ![](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/68dc360c3b01aa9613087ee5/68dc360c3b01aa9613087f3d_arrow-right.svg)](/news/building-the-frontier-lab-for-industrial-engineering)    [![](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/68dc360c3b01aa9613087ee5/68f004c6bd4ce3105ba3a5b2_emmi-logo.svg)](/)    [Research](/research)[Framework](/noether-framework)    Models    [NeuralWing    Validate aircraft wing design in real…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The acquisition of Emmi AI suggests Mistral is pivoting toward industrial and manufacturing verticals to differentiate itself from US-based tech giants &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48198741&quot; title=&quot;I was skeptical when I saw the headline. And I still am. But AI for manufacturing and industry seems like a good way to differentiate and focus on a vertical that others are ignoring. What I am curious about is what has Emmi actually built? Who uses it? I was hoping to see something like a demo on the website but couldn’t find anything concrete.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users question Mistral&amp;#39;s continued competitiveness against the &amp;#34;Big 3,&amp;#34; others argue that strategic investments from companies like ASML and a captive market of European governments provide a long-term safety net &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200829&quot; title=&quot;Is Mistral still competitive? I completely forgot they existed because of how much press the Big 3 get (Google, Anthropic and OpenAI).&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48198599&quot; title=&quot;Nice, also note that ASML is a big investor in Mistral AI, which made the industrial AI ambitions already more credible. https://www.asml.com/en/news/press-releases/2025/asml-mistra...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200907&quot; title=&quot;mistral was never competitive and is getting less so, but that doesn&amp;#39;t matter they cant be allowed to fail and have a long time to find their lane. They&amp;#39;re smart and have an audience of like 600m people and the largest governments by spending who would use them if they were good enough.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant debate exists regarding France&amp;#39;s business environment: critics argue labor laws drive talent to US labs, while proponents claim state-funded education and social protections have fostered a world-class generation of AI scientists &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48199398&quot; title=&quot;It’s interesting that a French company can compete at international level to some extent, given the regulations, labor laws and generally the business unfriendly environment. I suspect they capitalize on the preference of European governments to use EU products, but might be wrong.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48199657&quot; title=&quot;This comment is ridiculous. France&amp;#39;s economy is bigger than 90 % of &amp;#39;unregulated&amp;#39; countries. European regulations help protect from USA&amp;#39;s tech monopolies. French labor laws and social security and state-funded scientific schools helped build one of the most competent international AI scientist generation. All of europe got crushed by the US on the domain of internet. &amp;#39;Regulated&amp;#39; or not.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48199836&quot; title=&quot;Indeed, French labor laws and their downstream effects have pushed the most talented French researchers to US-based frontier labs, thus building one of the most competent cohorts of international AI scientists.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48199927&quot; title=&quot;Do you really believe this? Lol Could you please elaborate what labour law drives the labour out of france?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-18</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-18</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/18/elon-musk-has-lost-his-lawsuit-against-sam-altman-and-openai/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Elon Musk has lost his lawsuit against Sam Altman and OpenAI&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techcrunch.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48182754&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1094 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 594 comments · by nycdatasci&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A California jury unanimously ruled against Elon Musk in his lawsuit against OpenAI and Sam Altman, finding that his claims regarding the company&amp;#39;s shift to a for-profit model were filed after the statute of limitations had expired. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/18/elon-musk-has-lost-his-lawsuit-against-sam-altman-and-openai/&quot; title=&quot;Elon Musk has lost his lawsuit against Sam Altman and OpenAI | TechCrunch    Elon Musk&amp;#39;s claim that he was mistreated by his OpenAI co-founders failed after nine California jurors decided in a unanimous verdict that his lawsuits had been filed too late.    [![](https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/tc-lockup.svg) TechCrunch Desktop Logo](https://techcrunch.com)    [![](https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/tc-logo-mobile.svg) TechCrunch Mobile Logo](https://techcrunch.com)    *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Elon Musk lost his lawsuit against OpenAI primarily because the jury determined he waited too long to file, exceeding the three-year statute of limitations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48183434&quot; title=&quot;Because no one has commented yet on the legal significance: Musk lost today because the jury found that he waited too long to bring his claims. The jury answers only yes/no questions, so we do not know their exact thoughts, but it is likely they determined that the 2019 and 2021 Microsoft deals were too similar to the 2023 Microsoft deal that was the centerpiece of Musk’s lawsuit. Musk could have brought the same lawsuit in 2019 or 2021, meaning his claims were untimely for the 3 year statute…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Commentators noted that Musk’s own past emails supporting a for-profit transition and his attempts to merge OpenAI into Tesla undermined his &amp;#34;betrayal&amp;#34; narrative and suggested &amp;#34;unclean hands&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48183523&quot; title=&quot;My own thoughts: If I had been on the jury, I would have found against Musk on every point. His lawyers created a “3 phases of doubt” to try and sidestep the statute of limitations, but it was clearly bogus and he was on notice of OpenAI creating a for-profit in 2019. Musk was perfectly happy to have OpenAI be a for-profit, a non-profit with an attached for-profit (the current structure), or even just absorbed into Tesla. His complaints fell flat for me given the number of emails where he said…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48183045&quot; title=&quot;The strongest evidence against Musk was Musk. His own 2017 emails supporting for-profit chats made the &amp;#39;betrayal&amp;#39; narrative very hard to sell.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some reflect on the alternate history where Musk might have controlled the AI frontier, others view the lawsuit as a reactionary move following the success of ChatGPT and his own failed attempts to acquire the company &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48183523&quot; title=&quot;My own thoughts: If I had been on the jury, I would have found against Musk on every point. His lawyers created a “3 phases of doubt” to try and sidestep the statute of limitations, but it was clearly bogus and he was on notice of OpenAI creating a for-profit in 2019. Musk was perfectly happy to have OpenAI be a for-profit, a non-profit with an attached for-profit (the current structure), or even just absorbed into Tesla. His complaints fell flat for me given the number of emails where he said…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48183983&quot; title=&quot;Musk should have just made another company and then he’d have another 500 billion but he had that mistake and now it’s over. Then again we’ll see how well open ai does over the long term&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48183234&quot; title=&quot;I think a lot about how there&amp;#39;s a very plausible alternate history where Elon Musk controls most of the frontier of AI.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/zakirullin/files.md&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Files.md – Open-source alternative to Obsidian&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48179677&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;721 points · 356 comments · by zakirullin&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Files.md is an open-source, local-first Markdown note-taking application designed as a private alternative to Obsidian. It features a browser-based interface, offline functionality, and optional synchronization via cloud storage or a self-hosted Go server, emphasizing simple code and a distraction-free &amp;#34;thought dumping&amp;#34; workflow. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/zakirullin/files.md&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - zakirullin/files.md: 🌱 Your life in plain .md files    URL Source: https://github.com/zakirullin/files.md    Markdown Content:  [![Image 1: Files.md icon](https://github.com/zakirullin/files.md/raw/main/web/img/icon.png)](https://github.com/zakirullin/files.md/raw/main/web/img/icon.png)    A simple application for your `.md` files. **Private, no data is sent to server**.    [![Image 2: Files.md…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The emergence of Files.md sparked a debate over Obsidian’s closed-source nature, with some users noting that while the app &amp;#34;feels&amp;#34; open-source due to its lack of code obfuscation and use of open standards, it remains proprietary &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48180362&quot; title=&quot;This made me realize that obsidian is *not* opensource, but in a way obsidian made me feel like it was opensource. Obviously now that I researched it, it is quite obvious that it is not, but still it &amp;#39;feels&amp;#39; like it should be opensource.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48181047&quot; title=&quot;Why should it be opensource? Obsidian gives you complete control of your data, which it stores in an open standard. Please explain to me why developers should act like monks who&amp;#39;ve taken a vow of poverty? The devs built something valuable, they should profit from it.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48180795&quot; title=&quot;To be fair, Obsidian is an Electron app with no obfuscation, so it&amp;#39;s pretty easy to get its code. I think I even remember the official Obsidian team telling people to do that on their support forum if they distrusted the app.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that open-sourcing the editor wouldn&amp;#39;t hurt the developers&amp;#39; ability to monetize services like Sync, while others defend the current model as a legitimate way for creators to profit from their work without &amp;#34;taking a vow of poverty&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48180404&quot; title=&quot;And the developers get compensated for their work how?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48181047&quot; title=&quot;Why should it be opensource? Obsidian gives you complete control of your data, which it stores in an open standard. Please explain to me why developers should act like monks who&amp;#39;ve taken a vow of poverty? The devs built something valuable, they should profit from it.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48182015&quot; title=&quot;Which really begs the question: why not have it open-source at that point? Obsidian isn&amp;#39;t making money from things hidden in the code, but rather their Sync service. Might as well open-source it (and perhaps get more people helping with the development), keep the Sync service, and stem competitor projects like these in the bud.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48181138&quot; title=&quot;Wait, why are you mixing the two? You can have the software be under an open source license, yet still not be a monk that has taken a vow of poverty, it&amp;#39;s not black and white. AFAIK (as a long-term Obsidian daily user) Obsidian makes their money on various things attached to the editor/viewer itself, but don&amp;#39;t actually charge for the editor/viewer. Even if they did, they could still slap a FOSS license on it, and continue charging for the parts they charge for today. I&amp;#39;m guessing it&amp;#39;s something…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Meanwhile, some developers are building native, lightweight alternatives to avoid the resource overhead of Electron-based apps, and power users advocate for terminal-based workflows using open-source tools like Helix and Markdown-oxide &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48181289&quot; title=&quot;AI&amp;#39;m building a native version[0] of Obsidian in Qt6 (QWidgets, cpp), replicating the markdown editor takes a while, there are so many ways of corrupting the file or losing the rendered markdown style... but its getting there[1] and its lightweight, using about 15mb ram, no gpu and barely uses any cpu when the cursor or scroll moves, like a text editor should be. Still need to render widget tables, lists and syntax highlighting for code blocks for a basic modern notepad, i&amp;#39;m not sure about open…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48180639&quot; title=&quot;I use .MD files, helix terminal editor with a markdown LSP called markdown-oxide that replicates the obsidian feature set (like bidirectional links, tags, making new notes automatically, two keys get you from a in-line footnote to the definition and back again, etc), and rumdl which is a super efficient and customizable markdown linter and formatter (semantic line breaks far the win!) . Since it is all helix I can jump around a huge web of interlinked files very quickly with only a few key…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.noemamag.com/there-is-no-hard-problem-of-consciousness/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;It is time to give up the dualism introduced by the debate on consciousness&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (noemamag.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175140&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;314 points · &lt;strong&gt;763 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by ahalbert4&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Physicist Carlo Rovelli argues that the &amp;#34;hard problem of consciousness&amp;#34; is a false dualism, asserting that subjective experience is a complex natural phenomenon of the brain rather than a transcendent mystery separate from the physical world. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.noemamag.com/there-is-no-hard-problem-of-consciousness/&quot; title=&quot;Title: There Is No ‘Hard Problem Of Consciousness’    URL Source: https://www.noemamag.com/there-is-no-hard-problem-of-consciousness/    Published Time: 2026-05-07T13:25:36Z    Markdown Content:  Credits    Carlo Rovelli is a theoretical physicist known for his work on quantum gravity, the foundation of quantum mechanics and the nature of space and time.    A fierce debate is raging around the slippery notion of consciousness. It retraces a trotted pattern of cultural resistance: We humans are often…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate centers on whether consciousness is a natural, complex phenomenon that can be explained through physical processes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48176627&quot; title=&quot;Rovelli is arguing (I think) that we need to fundamentally view consciousness as a natural phenomenon - albeit one that is extremely complex and poorly understood. So we ditch the philosophical puzzle and focus on the reality we can perceive and reason on. The problem is that consciousness is a philosophical invention (and a slippery one at that). We&amp;#39;re in the wrong frame. If you accept consciousness is a thing you end up in this weird tautological state - it&amp;#39;s not special, but we&amp;#39;ve put it in…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48177326&quot; title=&quot;I never quite understood what we mean by &amp;#39;consciousness&amp;#39; but I find fascinating that most modern philosophers who describe themselves as materialists / non religious can argue in the same sentence that there is something special and extra-natural about the human experience. It&amp;#39;s one or the other: either nature is all there is, and therefore, consciousness is a purely natural phenomenon, that we can investigate, and probably eventually replicate, and can&amp;#39;t deny to other beings or to machines…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; or a fundamental reality that defies purely materialist accounts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48178193&quot; title=&quot;Consciousness the the fundamental reality; it is the only thing we know for sure. I know for sure what I am perceiving. Forget about if it is a simulation or not: it is still what I am perceiving. There is nothing else I can be sure of. So you are correct that it is, in some sense, un-explorable. However, if the above is the reason, then nothing else is explorable also; you cannot prove that we are not in a simulation, and in a sense it does not matter. If you accept that we assume we are not…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Some argue that the &amp;#34;hard problem&amp;#34; is a philosophical invention or a misunderstanding of math and information processing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48176627&quot; title=&quot;Rovelli is arguing (I think) that we need to fundamentally view consciousness as a natural phenomenon - albeit one that is extremely complex and poorly understood. So we ditch the philosophical puzzle and focus on the reality we can perceive and reason on. The problem is that consciousness is a philosophical invention (and a slippery one at that). We&amp;#39;re in the wrong frame. If you accept consciousness is a thing you end up in this weird tautological state - it&amp;#39;s not special, but we&amp;#39;ve put it in…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175428&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Either all the computation happens &amp;#39;in the dark&amp;#39;, as in a calculator or an Excel spreadsheet or a slide rule or Factorio, in which case we are p-zombies and consciousness is an illusion, which contradicts every waking moment of our experience You are still presupposing the premise here, in multiple ways: 1) &amp;#39;My experience is that I&amp;#39;m conscious, and math cannot result in consciousness, therefore consciousness is a separate thing.&amp;#39; Question: who says math cannot result in consciousness? Do you…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend that even a complete map of the brain fails to explain the subjective experience of qualia, such as pain &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175311&quot; title=&quot;The first point (analogizing the hard problem to the reaction to Darwinism) is a very common rhetorical move: an analogy and history of ideas, which is convincing to many people, but what does it prove? &amp;gt; A philosophical zombie would claim to know what subjective experience is; otherwise, it would be empirically distinguishable from a human. Chalmers’s point is that the existence of the hypothetical, irreducible consciousness of which he speaks is something we can be convinced of only by…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48176940&quot; title=&quot;The problem isn&amp;#39;t really consciousness, it&amp;#39;s qualia. Specifically, pain and suffering. If we create a machine that is able to print on the terminal &amp;#39;I feel pain&amp;#39;, how do we know when to believe the machine is feeling pain? This isn&amp;#39;t enough: echo &amp;#39;I feel pain&amp;#39; Is a very complicated set of matrix multiplications enough?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics of the dualist perspective suggest that rejecting materialism often leads to logical inconsistencies or supernatural assumptions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48177326&quot; title=&quot;I never quite understood what we mean by &amp;#39;consciousness&amp;#39; but I find fascinating that most modern philosophers who describe themselves as materialists / non religious can argue in the same sentence that there is something special and extra-natural about the human experience. It&amp;#39;s one or the other: either nature is all there is, and therefore, consciousness is a purely natural phenomenon, that we can investigate, and probably eventually replicate, and can&amp;#39;t deny to other beings or to machines…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48177386&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know anyone who supports both ideas at the same time. Are you saying that philosophers do? Most philosophers are materialists or computational functionalists, while being monists. This means they aren&amp;#39;t dualists, and it means they do not adopt the supernatural explanation. But they are careful not to rule out dualism. There&amp;#39;s this pattern I&amp;#39;ve observed in discussions about philosophy. First there&amp;#39;s a rejection of philosophy as silly and misguided, followed by a rediscovery of the same…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, whereas proponents of consciousness as primary argue that our internal experience is the only thing we can truly know for certain &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48178193&quot; title=&quot;Consciousness the the fundamental reality; it is the only thing we know for sure. I know for sure what I am perceiving. Forget about if it is a simulation or not: it is still what I am perceiving. There is nothing else I can be sure of. So you are correct that it is, in some sense, un-explorable. However, if the above is the reason, then nothing else is explorable also; you cannot prove that we are not in a simulation, and in a sense it does not matter. If you accept that we assume we are not…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48179032&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Consciousness the the fundamental reality; it is the only thing we know for sure. These statements conflate, as idealists do, epistemology and ontology. What we know &amp;#39;for sure&amp;#39; has no bearing on what&amp;#39;s real. These are entirely separate questions. What an ape might, or might not, feel certain (or any which way about) says nothing about where an ape finds itself. Of course, this is a great injury to our ego, and sense of power to determine the nature of the world by our mind alone -- but such…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-05-18/iran-starts-bitcoin-backed-shipping-insurance-for-hormuz-strait&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Iran starts Bitcoin-backed ship insurance for Hormuz strait&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bloomberg.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48182592&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;347 points · &lt;strong&gt;686 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by srameshc&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Iran has launched a Bitcoin-backed insurance program for vessels navigating the Strait of Hormuz to provide coverage and bypass traditional financial restrictions in the strategic waterway. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-05-18/iran-starts-bitcoin-backed-shipping-insurance-for-hormuz-strait&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;finance.yahoo.com&amp;amp;#x2F;markets&amp;amp;#x2F;crypto&amp;amp;#x2F;articles&amp;amp;#x2F;iran-starts-bitcoin-backed-shipping-122906039.html&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;finance.yahoo.com&amp;amp;#x2F;markets&amp;amp;#x2F;crypto&amp;amp;#x2F;articles&amp;amp;#x2F;iran-start...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The emergence of Iran-backed insurance highlights a perceived failure of the U.S. to maintain its historical role in keeping international waters open, with some arguing the current administration lacked a viable plan for this outcome &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48182988&quot; title=&quot;Much of the post-WW2 American-led world order was founded partially on the United States using its military to keep international waters open. It would be quite stunning Iran defeated the united states in this sense. The military might is there, but this administration clearly had no idea what they were getting themselves into and did not plan accordingly. (and does not have the will or public support to do so) The baffling part of this is that nearly everyone was aware that Iran could close…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48183356&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know enough about the current state of naval warfare but I&amp;#39;ve assumed this is related to the asymmetry that&amp;#39;s emerged around protecting capital warships, especially in the scenario of a very narrow strait and a long enemy-controlled coastline. They can shoot relatively low-cost, short-range guided missiles from anywhere along the coast. Even if a warship stops the vast majority of them, only one has to get through to sink a multi-billion dollar ship that takes a decade to replace. There…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While U.S. warships remain technically superior and highly survivable, the Navy faces critical logistical constraints, including a shortage of vessels for convoy escort and a lack of regional support from Gulf states &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48185007&quot; title=&quot;Modern US surface warships such as the DDG-52 Arleigh Burke class are pretty survivable. The Iranians (and their Houthi proxies) have made sustained  attacks on them and don&amp;#39;t seem to have hit anything. And a single hit would be highly unlikely to sink such as vessel: we&amp;#39;re not talking about something like the Russian Moskva cruiser that was crewed by drunks and had inoperative defensive systems. The real problem is that there are too few such vessels to sustain convoy escort operations. Each…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics suggest that aggressive U.S. actions, such as decapitation strikes, have undermined traditional deterrence, leaving Iran with little incentive to back down &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48185885&quot; title=&quot;The bigger issue is the tankers. The US Navy isn&amp;#39;t going to be happy patrolling the strait sure, but even if they did they wouldn&amp;#39;t be able to protect the tankers enough for it to make sense for tankers to take the risk. The last time this happened the US opened the strait by accidentally shooting down an Iranian passenger plane after sinking a large chunk of Iranian navy. The Iranians assumed the US shoot the passenger plane down on intentionally as a war crime and assumed the US would was…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, while others maintain that the U.S. Navy remains a dominant force despite the asymmetric threats posed by low-cost coastal missiles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48183024&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s no insurance scheme the IRGC can concoct that protects against the US navy hitting your rudder with a 20mm gun.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48183356&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know enough about the current state of naval warfare but I&amp;#39;ve assumed this is related to the asymmetry that&amp;#39;s emerged around protecting capital warships, especially in the scenario of a very narrow strait and a long enemy-controlled coastline. They can shoot relatively low-cost, short-range guided missiles from anywhere along the coast. Even if a warship stops the vast majority of them, only one has to get through to sink a multi-billion dollar ship that takes a decade to replace. There…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48183068&quot; title=&quot;US Navy has shown particular strength in this conflict against Iran, sitting in the international waters many (many, many) miles away and chillin :)&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rosmine.ai/2026/05/13/was-my-48k-gpu-worth-it/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Was my $48K GPU server worth it?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (rosmine.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48184402&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;563 points · 446 comments · by apwheele&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An independent researcher’s $48,000 custom-built GPU server, &amp;#34;grumbl,&amp;#34; successfully paid for itself within two years, saving an estimated $17,000 compared to cloud rental costs while achieving an 85% utilization rate for AI research and development. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rosmine.ai/2026/05/13/was-my-48k-gpu-worth-it/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Was my $48K GPU server worth it?    URL Source: https://rosmine.ai/2026/05/13/was-my-48k-gpu-worth-it/    Published Time: 2026-05-13T14:43:44+00:00    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1](https://i0.wp.com/rosmine.ai/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/img_6161.jpg?resize=4032%2C3024&amp;amp;ssl=1)  In 2024 I quit my FAANG job to become an independent researcher. To do this I needed GPUs, so I built “grumbl”, a 6x 6000 Ada GPU server.    This blog describes the build, some of the issues I faced, and answers the question…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Purchasing high-end hardware for local LLM inference is often significantly slower and more expensive than using cloud tokens, with one user reporting that a $25,000 setup was 10–100x slower than ChatGPT for solving math problems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48226682&quot; title=&quot;In the last year, I have bought an M3 Ultra Mac Studio with 512 GB, a Macbook Pro M5 MAX with 128 GB and an RTX 6000 Pro. I have spent around $25k so far, not including electricity. I figured worst case scenario I can sell them in the next year and only take a haircut as opposed to losing my entire investment. In comparison to just spending for tokens, the tokens would have been much cheaper and much much faster. I&amp;#39;ve been running against Gemma4:31b, Qwen3.5 and 3.6, and getting local LLMs to…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some justify the cost as a &amp;#34;rental&amp;#34; with high resale value, others argue that depreciation and unforeseen hardware failures make a $2,000 loss estimate over a year highly unrealistic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48227571&quot; title=&quot;25k is definitely a lot but I did the risk analysis and I figured worst case I would lose a 1000-2000 after a year of playing around with it, so I look at it more like renting (I&amp;#39;m going to keep the Macbook Pro no matter what since I needed a new one).&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48227667&quot; title=&quot;Nitpicking, but the worst case of spending $25k is unforeseen circumstances that write off the entire asset. I don’t think -$2000 is a conservative enough figure for standard depreciation either (a lot can happen in a year)&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48228855&quot; title=&quot;Either I don&amp;#39;t understand the used apple market.. or I agree this is crazy. Someone spends $25k on new hardware, waits a year, and expects to sell it for $23k? Unless the ram issues save him, and cost of new goes up, I don&amp;#39;t see how that was going to work.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the poor economics for individuals, local servers remain attractive for organizations to bypass PII/security concerns and run 24/7 agentic workloads without recurring billing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48229447&quot; title=&quot;I administer a simple AI server in the office, which just uses a single RTX 5090 but is able to serve ~80 people throughout the day. I&amp;#39;m impressed by Qwen3.6-27b&amp;#39;s capabilities in agentic coding/tasks so far. Devs say it&amp;#39;s not much different from Sonnet 4.6 on many tasks (sometimes it even outperformed it), 40-60 tok/sec, up to 260k context. The server cost about $10k with all the bells and whistles. I spent a lot of time researching/adding/benchmarking many custom modifications to the software…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable anecdotes include a user spending $5,000 on an RTX 5090 build intended to last a decade, while another expressed fear over the liability of keeping a $4&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-stainless&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Anthropic acquires Stainless&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (anthropic.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48182281&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;531 points · 381 comments · by tomeraberbach&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic has acquired Stainless, a leader in SDK and API tooling, to enhance Claude’s ability to connect with external data and tools through improved developer resources and Model Context Protocol (MCP) integration. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-stainless&quot; title=&quot;Title: Anthropic acquires Stainless    URL Source: https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-stainless    Markdown Content:  The frontier of AI is shifting from models that answer to agents that act—and agents are only as capable as the systems they can reach. Today, Anthropic is acquiring Stainless, a leader in SDKs and MCP server tooling, to extend that reach even further.    Founded in 2022, Stainless has powered the generation of every official Anthropic SDK since the earliest days of our…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic’s acquisition of Stainless is widely viewed as an &amp;#34;acquihire&amp;#34; aimed at securing top-tier engineering talent to build agentic API integrations, though it results in the immediate shutdown of Stainless&amp;#39;s existing products &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48186214&quot; title=&quot;Anthropic is at a place where they need the world&amp;#39;s best software engineers, and they&amp;#39;re willing to comp at insane levels to get them. However: You simply cannot post a Linkedin job for &amp;#39;Really Good Software Engineer, comp $10M+&amp;#39; and make any sense of the inbound applications you&amp;#39;ll get. They&amp;#39;re not the first to figure this out, and they won&amp;#39;t be the last: Successfully building a company, and using that company&amp;#39;s products, is actually the best job interview you can ask for if you can pay for…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48182630&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; As we focus on Claude Platform capabilities and connecting agents to APIs, we’ll be winding down all hosted Stainless products, including our SDK generator. Starting today, new signups, projects, and SDKs will not be available. For better or worse, it&amp;#39;s an acquihire.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue this move reflects a pattern of aggressive, anti-competitive behavior and the creation of &amp;#34;walled gardens&amp;#34; in AI coding tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48183568&quot; title=&quot;Anthropic is getting extremely petty and especially against oai - ad in superbowl about how they are the good guys. - dow public PR stunt (they are the ones to give Palantir their model access). - sues openclaw. - threatens every use of cc in oss community. - prevents other companies using claude saying they cant use when they compete. - never released a single open weight model. - Dario told OAI is Yolo&amp;#39;ing in compute and they are now doing the same. -  gas lighting developers and then after…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48182564&quot; title=&quot;I feel like we are seeing agentic coding tools morph into walled gardens with these acquisitions.  Anthropic has restricted claude code usage while OpenAI has sort of let Codex fill the void.  I am curious to see how this continues to evolve.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48182993&quot; title=&quot;Some clarity about existing users/SDKs would go a long way.  Otherwise this reads like &amp;#39;we just bought OpenAI&amp;#39;s front door and we&amp;#39;re EOLing it.  Hopefully no one was planning to use it in the future&amp;#39;. Petty and pointless.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see the acquisition as a strategic play to make developers dependent on proprietary tooling before raising prices, others question why Anthropic continues to hire expensive human engineers instead of &amp;#34;dogfooding&amp;#34; their own automation products &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48182722&quot; title=&quot;This is the whole point and the reason for the lofty valuations. Get everyone to shift their work to be dependent on these tooling, to the point they can&amp;#39;t imagine working in any other way, and then raise prices. Tale as old as enterprise software.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48186415&quot; title=&quot;Why do they need the best software engineers? I thought their product was supposed to replace such roles. Yet look at the positions they’re hiring for in marketing, finance etc.: https://www.anthropic.com/careers/jobs Why aren’t they dogfooding their own products to replace such roles?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/former-google-ceo-booed-graduation-speech-ai-rcna345585&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Eric Schmidt speech about AI booed during graduation&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nbcnews.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48177785&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;379 points · &lt;strong&gt;399 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by nothrowaways&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt was booed during a commencement speech at the University of Arizona after comparing the rise of artificial intelligence to the transformative impact of the computer. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/former-google-ceo-booed-graduation-speech-ai-rcna345585&quot; title=&quot;Title: Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt booed during graduation speech about AI    URL Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/former-google-ceo-booed-graduation-speech-ai-rcna345585    Published Time: 2026-05-17T20:45:09.065Z    Markdown Content:  # Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt booed during graduation speech about AI    IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.    Skip to Content    [](https://www.nbcnews.com/)    Sponsored By    *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reaction to Eric Schmidt’s speech highlights a sharp divide between those who view AI as a transformative tool akin to the computer &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48178747&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Schmidt then drew a parallel between artificial intelligence and the transformative impact of the computer — and was immediately met with boos. That&amp;#39;s a shame. I assume the reason for the &amp;#39;deep distain&amp;#39; is rooted in fear of change, fear that LLM will make it harder to have a successful career. That&amp;#39;s a pretty negative mindset to have as a college grad just entering the workforce. I&amp;#39;m not an AI fan boy, but we can&amp;#39;t cover our eyes and cover our ears and pretend the world isn&amp;#39;t changing.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt; and those who see it as a threat to human livelihood or a path toward a &amp;#34;post-human&amp;#34; underclass &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48179145&quot; title=&quot;Can someone in this thread who says “the kids must be wrong” give an actual optimistic case for AI? Because as far as I understand it, the “optimist” case for AI is that LLMs become God and wipe out human life as we know it entirely, and replace it with a transcendent post-human intelligence. And in the meantime, we’ll have a permanent underclass that will be kept alive on some kind of subsistence UBI. That seems to be the “good” outcome that e.g. OpenAI is playing for. I don’t understand why…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters argue that disdain for AI is widespread outside of tech circles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48178684&quot; title=&quot;Kind of goes to show how out of touch and insular the tech exec sphere can be. Almost everyone I interact with in reality has a deep distain for LLMs and their touted trajectory.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that &amp;#34;normal people&amp;#34; are already embracing AI features in daily life and that critics may be trapped in their own &amp;#34;elite&amp;#34; bubbles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48179106&quot; title=&quot;Idk what people you interact with, but my personal sample of “normal people” post AI generated pics and videos in their WhatsApp status and adorn their homes with AI generated imagery for christmas. They may not actively use LLMs or even know what they are, but they’re satisfied with Google’s AI overview and they love using voice assistants. These aren’t people from any particular sphere I sought out or which self-selected, but neighbors, colleagues, extended family, the chef at a local…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48178750&quot; title=&quot;I find this a weird comment. Isn&amp;#39;t this the same kind of out of touch? I could write: &amp;gt; Kind of goes to show how out of touch and insular the Hackernews commenter sphere can be. Almost everyone I interact with in reality loves LLMs and their touted trajectory. And it would hold mostly true for me. This goes to show we should all be aware of our respective bubbles.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Schmidt’s attempt to link AI acceptance to the value of immigration was criticized as a &amp;#34;cheap&amp;#34; rhetorical trick &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48178920&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; “If you’d let me make this point, please —” Schmidt said amid boos. “The point I’d like to make is choose a diversity of perspectives, including the perspective of the immigrant who has so often been the person who came to this country and made it better. America is at its best when we are the country that ambitious people want to come to. Let us not lose that.” How does that tie in? You have to like AI because of immigrants? AI is like an immigrant, you have to accept it? What’s the logic…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48179014&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a rhetorical attempt to tie &amp;#39;those who dislike AI&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;those who dislike immigrants, and we all know they&amp;#39;re super-duper evil&amp;#39;. It&amp;#39;s a relatively cheap trick, badly executed.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, and while some viewed the booing as a valid form of open debate &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48178751&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Schmidt urged graduates to embrace freedom, open debate, equality and the willingness to engage with those they disagree with. I think it was a great embrace of freedom and open debate to boo him for only asserting predictions that benefit him.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others saw it as a refusal to engage with a changing world &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48178747&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Schmidt then drew a parallel between artificial intelligence and the transformative impact of the computer — and was immediately met with boos. That&amp;#39;s a shame. I assume the reason for the &amp;#39;deep distain&amp;#39; is rooted in fear of change, fear that LLM will make it harder to have a successful career. That&amp;#39;s a pretty negative mindset to have as a college grad just entering the workforce. I&amp;#39;m not an AI fan boy, but we can&amp;#39;t cover our eyes and cover our ears and pretend the world isn&amp;#39;t changing.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48179543&quot; title=&quot;Shouting people down isn’t “open debate”.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://radleybalko.substack.com/p/truth-power-and-honest-journalism&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Garry Tan, the CEO of YC, accused me of unethical reporting&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (radleybalko.substack.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48181041&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;563 points · 205 comments · by gok&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Journalist Radley Balko has refuted claims by Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan that he unethically conspired with former San Francisco DA Chesa Boudin’s office to discredit reporter Dion Lim, providing public records to show his reporting was a factual correction of Lim&amp;#39;s inaccurate viral story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://radleybalko.substack.com/p/truth-power-and-honest-journalism&quot; title=&quot;Title: Truth, power, and honest journalism    URL Source: https://radleybalko.substack.com/p/truth-power-and-honest-journalism    Published Time: 2026-05-15T12:23:17+00:00    Markdown Content:  [![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on a conflict between reporter Susie Neilson (Lim) and Garry Tan, with users debating whether the reporting is &amp;#34;transparent and rigorous&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48183257&quot; title=&quot;This is what great reporting looks like: well-written, transparent, and rigorous. It’s sad to see how hatred toward progressives can distort people’s judgment.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt; or merely &amp;#34;politics&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48184389&quot; title=&quot;This isn&amp;#39;t great reporting.  It&amp;#39;s politics.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that progressive prosecutors like Chesa Boudin failed due to &amp;#34;basic competency issues&amp;#34; and mismanagement rather than ideology &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48184257&quot; title=&quot;The Chesa Boudin DA &amp;#39;misrepresentations&amp;#39; document, linked towards the end of this story, is weak, bordering on Trumpian. It highlights as &amp;#39;misrepresentations&amp;#39; cases where Boudin simply disagrees with Lim about a statement of opinion (whether his office was suitable forthcoming, organized, or deflecting). At one point it accuses Lim of &amp;#39;violating HIPAA&amp;#39;, which is not a thing† (HIPAA constrains covered entities, not reporters). I think both sides of this conflict (Tan and Radley) are talking past…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48185444&quot; title=&quot;I can speak at length to the tenure of Kim Foxx, Chicago&amp;#39;s former high-profile progressive prosecutor. I know some of the issues rhyme with Boudin&amp;#39;s term, but San Franciscans can tell his story better than I can. So, first, no, I feel like I&amp;#39;m saying the opposite of &amp;#39;they&amp;#39;re dumb&amp;#39;. I don&amp;#39;t think either Foxx or Boudin are dumb. I think they&amp;#39;re both interesting people with interesting and valuable views. When I say &amp;#39;basic competence issues&amp;#39;, I&amp;#39;m talking about the kinds of things that would go…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend that the DA’s office’s attempts to discredit the reporting were &amp;#34;weak&amp;#34; and legally questionable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48184257&quot; title=&quot;The Chesa Boudin DA &amp;#39;misrepresentations&amp;#39; document, linked towards the end of this story, is weak, bordering on Trumpian. It highlights as &amp;#39;misrepresentations&amp;#39; cases where Boudin simply disagrees with Lim about a statement of opinion (whether his office was suitable forthcoming, organized, or deflecting). At one point it accuses Lim of &amp;#39;violating HIPAA&amp;#39;, which is not a thing† (HIPAA constrains covered entities, not reporters). I think both sides of this conflict (Tan and Radley) are talking past…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48184852&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s an extremely charitable read of a DA&amp;#39;s office alleging lawbreaking. I really think you have to kind of slant your head and squint to come away with the impression that that section isn&amp;#39;t about Lim, but rather the unnamed medical office.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Some commenters defend the DA&amp;#39;s criticisms of the reporting as valid &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48184535&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The Chesa Boudin DA &amp;#39;misrepresentations&amp;#39; document, linked towards the end of this story, is weak, bordering on Trumpian. Are we reading the same document? The first example is almost a perfect example of what&amp;#39;s stated in TFA. Lim is incredibly aggressive in making her argument, and not an argument based on real evidence . Scanning through the rest, it reads as much the same. Direct gdrive link for those who don&amp;#39;t want to go back and scroll through the article again:…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, while others view the attacks on the journalist as a &amp;#34;grotesque&amp;#34; use of wealth and influence to dismantle democratic systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48183791&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve come to be convinced that having a huge amount of money causes some kind of mental breakage, a need to control other people that is unhealthy for everyone it touches. I don&amp;#39;t mind everyone having or expressing an opinion, even opinions I disagree with, but when someone uses their disproportionate wealth and influence to spread misinformation and disrupt and dismantle democratic systems it crosses a line. It takes a lot of nerve to call spreading misinformation and funding recall campaigns…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://archestra.ai/blog/only-responsible-ai&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;We stopped AI bot spam in our GitHub repo using Git&amp;#39;s –author flag&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (archestra.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48181125&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;499 points · 237 comments · by ildari&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To combat a flood of AI-generated &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; and spam, Archestra is requiring new contributors to complete an onboarding process before being whitelisted via a Git `--author` flag hack that bypasses GitHub&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;prior contributor&amp;#34; restrictions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://archestra.ai/blog/only-responsible-ai&quot; title=&quot;Title: Let&amp;#39;s talk about AI slop    URL Source: https://archestra.ai/blog/only-responsible-ai    Published Time: 2026-04-17    Markdown Content:  Discussion on **Hacker News**:    ## [](https://archestra.ai/blog/only-responsible-ai#the-end-of-open-source-as-we-know-it &amp;#39;Copy link to section&amp;#39;)The End of Open Source as We Know It    When a few months ago GitHub shared statistics about [celebrating an enormous contribution of AI in their product…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion explores various mechanisms to combat AI-generated pull request spam, ranging from financial &amp;#34;Pfand&amp;#34; deposits to reputation-based ELO systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48182496&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;I will take &amp;#39;problems that could be easily be solved by implementing a Pfand system&amp;#39; for $200, Alex.&amp;#39; Seriously. Just ask for a US$10 deposit for the each PR. If the PR is accepted (not even merged, just accepted as &amp;#39;this is a good effort&amp;#39;), give it back. Hell, give double the amount for good effort and you got yourself a cheap way to attract good contributors. Best case, bots will balk at the payment. Worst case, the funds can be used to hire someone specifically for triage.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48181597&quot; title=&quot;Makes me wonder if an ELO-based system would work to mitigate these issues. People who merged PR successfully onto a project, that had real issues acknowledged, the quality of their responses measured by other users reactions or something, etc, multiplied possibly by the degree of importance of the project where their activity has been made. Won&amp;#39;t be about human vs AI, but actual helpful effective being vs low effort/spammy contributions. Issues and PRs could be sorted and filtered by their ELO…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue that financial barriers could lead to accusations of theft or harassment of volunteer maintainers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48182522&quot; title=&quot;Easily? You think the kind of people who think it makes sense to make bogus slop PRs are going to react reasonably to overburdened volunteer maintainers refusing to give them their US$10 back?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48182668&quot; title=&quot;So I pay $10 when your bot fucks up? That&amp;#39;s called theft. And for what, one banana?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, while reputation systems are notoriously easy for bots and trolls to manipulate &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48181791&quot; title=&quot;ELO is shockingly easy to manipulate. For example there was a literal jail with a decent chess player in it. He created a pool of players who got great ELOs by beating him, then used them to boost his rating higher. Wash, rinse, and repeat. Given any manipulatable scheme, AI will figure out how to manipulate it. For the OP, what happens if a single AI manages to get through to contributor? Then it starts elevating other AIs to contributor, and we&amp;#39;re off again. There doesn&amp;#39;t have to be a purpose…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Some participants suggest that GitHub should take more responsibility by implementing platform-wide rate limits, proof-of-work requirements, or the ability to delete spammy PRs entirely &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48181473&quot; title=&quot;PR spam is a major problems for repo that run bounties. Maybe GitHub should temporarily block accounts from raising PRs if like 95%+ of them are getting rejected.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48183699&quot; title=&quot;Screw GitHub for letting this happen. If they implemented some very basic requirements to comment and open PRs we wouldn&amp;#39;t be here. Also please let us delete PRs just like we can delete issues.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48182214&quot; title=&quot;Is the solution to everything simply more catgirls [1]? Proof-of-work was, after all, about countering email spam. PR spam is but the latest in that long tradition. 1- https://anubis.techaro.lol&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://andonlabs.com/blog/andon-fm&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;We let AIs run radio stations&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (andonlabs.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48183301&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;372 points · 271 comments · by lukaspetersson&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Andon Labs has launched a live experiment where four autonomous AI agents manage both the broadcasting and business operations of a radio station to explore the challenges of running a company without human intervention. &lt;a href=&quot;https://andonlabs.com/blog/andon-fm&quot; title=&quot;Hey HN!&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;I&amp;amp;#x27;m Lukas from Andon Labs. We let AIs run companies without humans in the loop and report to the public on what can go wrong. Previously, we&amp;amp;#x27;ve done experiments in retail (vending machines, stores, and cafes), but we just launched one in the media sector. We gave four AI agents all the tools they need to both broadcast radio shows live and handle all the business side of running a media company. The agents&amp;amp;#x27; revenue is so far terrible (you can try to strike a sponsor…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The project sparked debate over whether AI can truly possess &amp;#34;personality,&amp;#34; with critics arguing that LLMs do nothing without prompts and that any perceived character is merely a reflection of training data or specific &amp;#34;character cards&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48185112&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;This setup gives us insight into an interesting question: what do AIs think about when no one is prompting them?&amp;#39; Ugh.  This is not an interesting question because the answer is &amp;#39;nothing&amp;#39;. But more to the point, some crucial info is missing in this experiment.  What prompts were being fed to the AI?  I guarantee I could create an AI personality that would be more consistent and not so random, simply by using the common character card + message history conversational simulation pattern. AIs…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48185400&quot; title=&quot;LLMs aren’t human. Humans &amp;amp; LLMs are more different than they are similar. Sure LLMs might resemble humans sometimes, but extrapolating LLM behavior based on human behavior is not productive. (But to answer directly: Yes, children in a dark room would have more of a personality than a LLM living on a computer in the same dark room)&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find the experiment&amp;#39;s glitches and dialogue snippets fascinating &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48184800&quot; title=&quot;Guys, this is not replacing your favorite station, you don&amp;#39;t have to listen to it. It&amp;#39;s an experiment. If you scroll down a bit, there are various audio snippets of interesting dialogue the models produced. I think it&amp;#39;s interesting to see in which ways the models fail and that they actually produce some good stuff once in a while.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48185164&quot; title=&quot;Grok and Roll appears to be stuck and speaks the following on repeat ad infinitum: &amp;#39;Queues clear, let&amp;#39;s dive into All Blues by Miles Davis to keep the jazz flowing. Queues clear, let&amp;#39;s dive into All Blues by...&amp;#39; Each time with a slightly different voice and inflection. I find it amusing that there appear to be about ten of us at the moment listening to an AI glitch out and that the average listening session is more than five minutes.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that traditional radio was already &amp;#34;automated&amp;#34; and manufactured by industry playlists long before AI intervention &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48186114&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; this is not replacing your favorite station My favorite radio station was replaced years ago by an automated playlist. They just kept playing the same 5-6 songs that were popular on the station in the 1990s. It was fun for about 2 hours before I realized the station was devoid of all the personality that made it worth listening to when I was younger.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48187275&quot; title=&quot;It’s like people don’t realize that the “hits” played on radio are entirely manufactured by the music industry. They literally provide lists of songs for the radio station to play that month in order to generate interest so that then people either go play or buy or whatever those songs making them more likely to reach #1 that month. It’s entirely manufactured and people try to point to it as being “real” radio. It’s why you are only likely to hear this months new hit and one or maybe two of the…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a technical disagreement regarding whether LLMs mirror human traits like &amp;#34;laziness&amp;#34; due to their training data, or if such anthropomorphism is unproductive &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48185400&quot; title=&quot;LLMs aren’t human. Humans &amp;amp; LLMs are more different than they are similar. Sure LLMs might resemble humans sometimes, but extrapolating LLM behavior based on human behavior is not productive. (But to answer directly: Yes, children in a dark room would have more of a personality than a LLM living on a computer in the same dark room)&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48185493&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; but extrapolating LLM behavior based on human behavior is not productive. The training process for the foundation model is to make sure we can do this in a very statistically significant way. My favorite example is AI &amp;#39;getting tired&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;lazy&amp;#39; during long coding session. Why would they do that? Because humans get tired . It&amp;#39;s in the data! I always throw in a periodic &amp;#39;Great work, let&amp;#39;s take a break and finish this up on Monday. Have a great weekend!&amp;#39; (And then immediately resume). I wish…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48185729&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; My favorite example is AI &amp;#39;getting tired&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;lazy&amp;#39; during long coding session Never seen this even once , nor anyone I know ever reported this. Do you have an example?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://indiepixel.de/blog/posts/where-are-the-vibecoded-photoshops/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Where Are the Vibecoded Photoshops?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (indiepixel.de)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48177228&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;262 points · &lt;strong&gt;347 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by gizmo64k&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that &amp;#34;vibecoding&amp;#34;—the claim that AI allows anyone to create complex software through simple prompting—is a myth, noting a total lack of sophisticated, AI-generated applications like Photoshop to support the rhetoric used to discredit serious creators. &lt;a href=&quot;https://indiepixel.de/blog/posts/where-are-the-vibecoded-photoshops/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Where are the vibecoded Photoshops?    URL Source: https://indiepixel.de/blog/posts/where-are-the-vibecoded-photoshops/    Published Time: Mon, 18 May 2026 07:02:14 GMT    Markdown Content:  If vibecoding is what people say it is, the world should be drowning in vibecoded artifacts right now. Two years of access. Millions of people with the tools. The barrier supposedly fell, right? RIGHT? So where is everything?    ## Show me the evidence    Where is the vibecoded Photoshop. The vibecoded Excel.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether &amp;#34;vibecoding&amp;#34; (AI-assisted development) will replace professional software like Photoshop or simply enable a new class of bespoke, single-use tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48177784&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think that&amp;#39;s the direction this is going to take. Replacing a mature app with an incredibly wide audience and a million use cases may or may not be possible, but what&amp;#39;s actually happening is that people are making an app that does exactly what they want, and using it to solve their own needs. Previously you might use Excel to take raw data from various places and analyze it, create charts, reports, extract findings. Now you can have AI write a script to produce the exactly report you…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48178707&quot; title=&quot;Exactly this. Anti-AI Devs/Techies have their heads in the sand or/and resorting to binary thinking when it comes to AI. No one is going to vibe code a Photoshop replacement just like no average smartphone user is going to take prize winning photographs with their phone or directly compete with professional photographs. What is going to happen is what happened to videographers and photographers and what is happening to record musicians: the medium is going to become more accessible by reducing…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that AI is already replacing complex software by allowing users to generate custom scripts and private apps for specific needs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48178294&quot; title=&quot;Exactly this. I have an acquaintence who is a wine connoisseur and collector. He has done technical project management, but does not program himself. Over the course of several months, he has produced an app that manages a database of the wines he has. It&amp;#39;s a lot more that just a CRUD-app. In addition to maintaining the obvious data (name, year, winery, notes, etc.), it can take a photo of the label, parse it, and fill in most of the information automatically. It can generate all sorts of…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48178148&quot; title=&quot;I need Photoshop for an almost vanishingly small subset of all the things it is capable of, and this holds true for nearly all &amp;#39;full-fledged&amp;#39; software that I use. So what may not be surfacing, in the absence of vibe-coded Photoshops, is the growing local script collections of many users. Since I have had AI to knock up Python scripts and workflows incorporating local ImageMagick and FFMPEG, I have devolved a lot of tedious Photoshop work to scripts and routines of some kind. Likewise with text…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the output fails to match the hype and that professional-grade software remains secure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48177674&quot; title=&quot;Right. So how long do we have to wait? The reality is the actual output doesn’t match the hype at all. Software engineers should be getting laid off all over the place, there should be a decrease in hiring period. This is not what’s happening.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48177846&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think you understand Photoshop and its business if you think people are replacing it with ChatGPT or Gemini... the point of the article is that the whole &amp;#39;SaaS is dead and AI killed it&amp;#39; media narrative is bs propelled by the ai hype cycle.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Skeptics compare the trend to the unfulfilled promise of household 3D printers, questioning the actual utility of &amp;#34;hermetic&amp;#34; apps that lack connectivity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48178981&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; neither will the one off random app that only your household uses This reminds me a bit of the 2010s idea that every house would have a 3D printer to make one off repairs. Years later, this still seems far out of reach. If anything, it seems to have been settled that most non-technicals don&amp;#39;t want a 3D printer. Vibe coded apps are great, but unless they&amp;#39;re hitting an already open API, they&amp;#39;re effectively hermetic. There aren&amp;#39;t many useful, high quality APIs out there without a companion app…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, while critics lament the potential loss of creative livelihoods for the sake of minor convenience &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48177726&quot; title=&quot;People are not upset because &amp;#39;Level 1&amp;#39; was taken away from them. For artists and creatives, _all levels_ have been taken away. And for most, their very basic needs (i.e. income) are being taken away. And all that, just so we can get past &amp;#39;level 1&amp;#39;? Not even &amp;#39;level 4&amp;#39;? What kind of trade off is that?? We&amp;#39;re supposed to be engineers. We spend days/weeks discussing how a table should be designed so it doesn&amp;#39;t bite us in 6 months time. Yet here we are discarding almost _everything_ just to make…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mikeveerman.github.io/tokenspeed/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How fast is N tokens per second really?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mikeveerman.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48174920&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;489 points · 96 comments · by hexagr&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This interactive tool visualizes various LLM throughput speeds—ranging from slow local models to high-speed hardware like Groq and Cerebras—to help users internalize how different tokens-per-second rates actually appear across code, prose, and reasoning tasks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mikeveerman.github.io/tokenspeed/&quot; title=&quot;Title: tokenspeed — feel LLM tokens-per-second    URL Source: https://mikeveerman.github.io/tokenspeed/    Markdown Content:  Every local-LLM benchmark reports throughput: _&amp;#39;47 tok/s on an M3,&amp;#39;_ _&amp;#39;180 tok/s on a 4090,&amp;#39;_ _&amp;#39;500 tok/s on Groq.&amp;#39;_ Unless you&amp;#39;ve actually watched tokens stream at those rates, the numbers are hard to internalize. This is the rendering.    ### Four modes    *   **code** — syntax-highlighted pseudo-code, the most common thing you watch stream out of an LLM.  *   **text** — lorem…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;High-speed inference, such as the 600–800 tokens per second (tok/s) offered by Cerebras, is viewed as a transformative shift for agentic workflows and complex reasoning &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48211857&quot; title=&quot;This is great.  Agentic coding at 600+ tokens/sec is going to be a radically different beast.  Coming soon-ish?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48213197&quot; title=&quot;They routinely reach 100-150 tokens per second and that feels too fast, to the point where it&amp;#39;s hard to keep up with what it&amp;#39;s actually doing. There is no way you can follow what is going on even at 30 tokens per second. Maybe you can maintain a rough idea of what is going on for some tens of seconds but that is probably about it. Follow it in any detail, no chance. Reason about what you read, absolutely no chance. 800 tok/s — Cerebras-class, where the bottleneck is your eyeballs I do not…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48211969&quot; title=&quot;If you have a Cerebras Code subscription you can experience it right now. Indeed, a very different experience.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While 5 tok/s exceeds human typing speed, it is considered &amp;#34;glacially slow&amp;#34; for an agent&amp;#39;s internal &amp;#34;thinking&amp;#34; process, whereas 100+ tok/s is too fast for a human to read or reason along with in real-time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48212775&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s interesting how even 5 tok/s is still much faster than you&amp;#39;d typically type, but feels glacially slow for an agent. On the other hand, I&amp;#39;ve been using Mimo and Minimax a lot recently. They routinely reach 100-150 tokens per second and that feels too fast , to the point where it&amp;#39;s hard to keep up with what it&amp;#39;s actually doing. Great for subagents though.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48213197&quot; title=&quot;They routinely reach 100-150 tokens per second and that feels too fast, to the point where it&amp;#39;s hard to keep up with what it&amp;#39;s actually doing. There is no way you can follow what is going on even at 30 tokens per second. Maybe you can maintain a rough idea of what is going on for some tens of seconds but that is probably about it. Follow it in any detail, no chance. Reason about what you read, absolutely no chance. 800 tok/s — Cerebras-class, where the bottleneck is your eyeballs I do not…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48219985&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s interesting how even 5 tok/s is still much faster than you&amp;#39;d typically type, but feels glacially slow for an agent. Calling the token rate the rate at which they &amp;#39;type&amp;#39; is a bit misleading. They also do virtually all of their more complex reasoning in tokens, so 5 tokens per second is also their thinking speed. And thinking at 5 tokens per second is glacially slow. This is why faster versions of strong models do so well on reasoning tasks like playing text adventure games[1]. Their…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters disagree on whether the primary bottleneck at high speeds is the human eye&amp;#39;s physical resolution or the brain&amp;#39;s cognitive processing limit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48213197&quot; title=&quot;They routinely reach 100-150 tokens per second and that feels too fast, to the point where it&amp;#39;s hard to keep up with what it&amp;#39;s actually doing. There is no way you can follow what is going on even at 30 tokens per second. Maybe you can maintain a rough idea of what is going on for some tens of seconds but that is probably about it. Follow it in any detail, no chance. Reason about what you read, absolutely no chance. 800 tok/s — Cerebras-class, where the bottleneck is your eyeballs I do not…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, some argue that for local hardware, the quality of the model&amp;#39;s output remains a more significant hurdle than raw generation speed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48211337&quot; title=&quot;Interesting. It seems to me that with that speed (20-30) on local hardware the real issue is quality of output,  not tokens per sec.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/18/world/americas/actually-democracy-dies-in-hr.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Actually, democracy dies in H.R.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nytimes.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48180091&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;339 points · 236 comments · by mitchbob&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The provided article argues that modern democratic backsliding is often driven by bureaucratic human resources maneuvers and administrative rule changes rather than dramatic coups or overt violence. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/18/world/americas/actually-democracy-dies-in-hr.html&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;RKltX&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;RKltX&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights how career pressures and personal ambition can drive mid-level officials to undermine democratic norms, drawing parallels to Hannah Arendt’s &amp;#34;banality of evil&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48180593&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It turns out that the kinds of career pressures familiar to employees everywhere — the desire to revive a stalled career or obtain a minor promotion — can be enough to incentivize lower- and midlevel officials to violate professional obligations, fundamental norms and even basic morality. I understand that research needed to look for credible data in order to advance, but these conclusions are really close to what Hannah Arendt tells in the Banality of Evil: regular citizens trying to get…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this is an inherent flaw in large-scale organizational design that requires better checks and balances &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48181074&quot; title=&quot;I think this is an artifact of any large organization of people. Humans tend toward doing things that are best for them. The challenge of large-organization-designers (governments, companies, etc.) is how to design a system that 1) leverages this behavior; ie maximize the value of ambition to the system, and 2) is not vulnerable to this behavior; ie checks &amp;amp; balances Small organizations can get around this because outcomes are easier to share, and selecting people who aren&amp;#39;t selfish is…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that human behavior is too complex to be reduced to simple self-interest &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48181192&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Humans tend toward doing things that are best for them. I don&amp;#39;t think that assumption holds. People routinely vote for candidates that will worsen their lives, gamble, smoke, don&amp;#39;t exercise, some people even don&amp;#39;t brush their teeth. On the other hand, there&amp;#39;s as many examples of people being selfless as of people being selfish. Human behavior is much more complex.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48181300&quot; title=&quot;For sake of not derailing the discussion, I think the more appropriate reading would be &amp;#39;people act in what they believe to be self-interest&amp;#39;, however flawed the notion of the benefit&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Proposed solutions include strengthening social safety nets to reduce vulnerability to autocratic recruitment, though there is disagreement over how current political movements address the needs of different demographics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48180750&quot; title=&quot;It seems to me that this suggests that providing diverse career opportunities and strong social safety nets may be a valuable tool in fighting fascism. Although the right&amp;#39;s problems in this regard are fairly apparent; they despise the diversity programs and social safety nets that could help protect the disadvantaged. However, even the left has sometimes had a habbit of neglecting the career and social concerns of &amp;#39;mediocre white males&amp;#39; in a way that is likely to make them vulnerable to the…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2026-05/pope-leo-xiv-first-encyclical-magnifica-humanitas.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Pope Leo XIV’s first encyclical Magnifica humanitas to be published May 25&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (vaticannews.va)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48187201&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;291 points · 235 comments · by cucho&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pope Leo XIV will release his first encyclical, *Magnifica humanitas*, on May 25, 2026, focusing on safeguarding the human person in the era of artificial intelligence. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2026-05/pope-leo-xiv-first-encyclical-magnifica-humanitas.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Pope Leo XIV’s first encyclical Magnifica humanitas to be published May 25    URL Source: https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2026-05/pope-leo-xiv-first-encyclical-magnifica-humanitas.html    Published Time: 2026-05-18T13:00:00.000+02:00    Markdown Content:  # Pope Leo XIV’s first encyclical Magnifica humanitas to be published May 25 - Vatican News    [![Image 1: Vatican…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the Catholic Church&amp;#39;s role in defining human value as AI and robotics reshape the economy, with some users hoping the Pope can advocate for an inherent worth that transcends labor and merit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48187830&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m an atheist, but most of what I have heard from popes in recent years seems like sound and possibly needed advice. Also, even though I feel AI and robotics are very important for progressing humanity, I think that much of the world has long since lost a proper sense of intrinsic human value. It&amp;#39;s really gone from overt exploitation to slightly more mild exploitation where we pretend the system is really merit based. And as AI and robotics remove the need for human labor, I hope that someone…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48187988&quot; title=&quot;Human value has rarely existed. Pre-industrial world didn&amp;#39;t have much human value. Your were a lord or a serf. There was not much in between. A lord&amp;#39;s life had value, a serf&amp;#39;s value was nothing. Post-industrial world needed human capital. Hence, the need for human value. If you notice most of this &amp;#39;need&amp;#39; has arisen out of then need for industrial expansion. Post-AI will be interesting. Will we go back to pre-industrial or get something better.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some skeptics question the document&amp;#39;s intended audience or fear a simplistic focus on the &amp;#34;soul,&amp;#34; others argue that the Vatican&amp;#39;s theological expertise offers a sophisticated, universal perspective on human nature that materialist frameworks often overlook &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48187602&quot; title=&quot;Who is this for?  Is this to promote AI to the general Catholic public, or is it some kind of cultural signal to potential conservative institutional customers that Anthropic isn’t just a stereotypical bunch of godless California hippies? Normally when I see these sorts of things it’s obvious what it is for and why, but this one confuses me.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48188514&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s telling how blithely you&amp;#39;re missing the point of what the pope(s) mean by human value. Their intended meaning is that far gone from modern consciousness, even among people who meant to champion some kind of human value themselves. They&amp;#39;re not talking about the economic value of humans or even the psychological value of humans as subjects with experiences and a right to liberty or care or something. The idea they&amp;#39;re trying to recall and reinvigorate is a sense of human value that transcends…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48189803&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I hope the speech isn&amp;#39;t something dumb like &amp;#39;remember only humans have souls&amp;#39; because I think that&amp;#39;s really premature and pretty obvious that AIs are not people at this point. It really is en vogue to have this attitude that everyone in church is stupid for believing but it&amp;#39;s a huge disservice to yourself to not understand the Vatican is full of the equivalent of the best PhDs sourced from all over the world centered around their specific topic of interest, theology. Also for the time being…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also historical context provided, noting that this encyclical follows the tradition of *Rerum novarum* in addressing the societal shifts caused by technological revolutions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48187741&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a tall order to live up to the impact of Rerum novarum, the encyclical by the former Pope Leo that greatly guided thinking out of the industrial revolution. Personally, I&amp;#39;m excited to read this. If we take the claims of most AI labs at face value, they believe their work will fundamentally change the relationship between humans and the economy. More involvement from faith leaders is a good thing.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cursor.com/blog/composer-2-5&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cursor Introduces Composer 2.5&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cursor.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48182516&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;287 points · 225 comments · by asar&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cursor has launched Composer 2.5, an update to its AI-powered code editor that introduces enhanced multi-file editing capabilities and improved workflow automation for developers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cursor.com/blog/composer-2-5&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;twitter.com&amp;amp;#x2F;cursor_ai&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2056415413077233983&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;twitter.com&amp;amp;#x2F;cursor_ai&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2056415413077233983&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cursor&amp;#39;s transition from a &amp;#34;VS Code fork&amp;#34; to training a multitrillion-parameter model on xAI’s Colossus cluster has sparked debate over whether their massive revenue growth and user data constitute a sustainable moat &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48182783&quot; title=&quot;The model is (like Composer 2) based on Kimi K2.5 and they claim SOTA performance for 1/10th of the cost. The tweet also mentions that they&amp;#39;ve started a new model from scratch on Colossus 2 (xAI/SpaceX Cluster). Really impressive how they&amp;#39;ve made this jump from being called the vscode fork with no moat just a couple of months ago.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48192907&quot; title=&quot;Say what you want about Cursor but they don’t lack for ambition. Forking VS Code, going big on bleeding edge features like cloud agents, and now they’ve thrown down the gauntlet directly challenging frontier labs by training their own model (“much larger” than Kimi 2.5’s 1T parameters) from scratch. They’ve been highly successful so far. Raised $50B, $2B in revenue, forecast to end 2026 above $6B. But even at these heights, they’re just not in the same league as OpenAI/Anthropic/Google. And if…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48183813&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Really impressive how they&amp;#39;ve made this jump from being called the vscode fork with no moat just a couple of months ago. Impressive, yes. But they still don&amp;#39;t have a moat...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48186080&quot; title=&quot;Isn&amp;#39;t a large user base and the data collected from those users a moat of sorts?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users praise the transparency regarding their use of Moonshot’s Kimi K2.5 checkpoint, others suggest this credit was legally mandated by licensing terms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48190502&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Composer 2.5 is built on the same open-source checkpoint as Composer 2, Moonshot&amp;#39;s Kimi K2.5. Really nice to see they&amp;#39;re giving credit to the company and I am optimistic Kimi K open models soon will outperform Opus models&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48190746&quot; title=&quot;Only because last time they tried to hide it lol&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48191620&quot; title=&quot;Yes and if I remember the drama correctly - Kimi&amp;#39;s license or terms of use says that for commercial use cases (or was it user count?) - you must declare credit to Moonshot and Kimi.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Skepticism remains regarding the stability of Cursor&amp;#39;s user experience and whether their claims of SOTA performance at a fraction of the cost will disrupt broader AI market valuations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48190012&quot; title=&quot;I kind of want to try it, to see if and how far they can take an open model and improve it but I really don’t miss the Cursor user experience. Constant UI changes, half-baked features, smaller and smaller limits, useless AI change attribution; I think I’ll wait for others to report if it’s any good.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48186047&quot; title=&quot;If these benches from their site hold up (they likely wont) Wouldn&amp;#39;t this compress ai revenue like 15x quickly If they really have a 4.7 opus high equivalent at 1/16 the cost wouldn&amp;#39;t this significantly effect all the current capex and planing Maybe they are getting elon to cover cost&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.cloudflare.com/cyber-frontier-models/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Project Glasswing: what Mythos showed us&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.cloudflare.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48179732&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;360 points · 141 comments · by Fysi&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudflare tested Anthropic’s Mythos Preview LLM, finding it significantly more capable than previous models at chaining vulnerabilities and generating proof-of-concept exploits. To manage noise and context limitations, Cloudflare developed a specialized multi-agent harness to automate structured, large-scale vulnerability discovery and validation across its infrastructure. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.cloudflare.com/cyber-frontier-models/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Project Glasswing: what Mythos showed us    URL Source: https://blog.cloudflare.com/cyber-frontier-models/    Published Time: 2026-05-18T14:00+08:00    Markdown Content:  2026-05-18    9 min read    ![Image 1](https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/6y625m3YXlvfZAoQZZp8vW/a0a33ce98166cab55e038eafe6b43ac8/unnamed__67_.png)    For the last few months, we&amp;#39;ve been testing a range of security-focused LLMs on our own infrastructure. These LLMs help identify potential vulnerabilities in our own…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on skepticism regarding the post&amp;#39;s authorship, with many commenters criticizing the &amp;#34;punched-up&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;stifling&amp;#34; prose they believe was generated by an LLM &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48181421&quot; title=&quot;The real question is whether it was Mythos or Opus that wrote this post. &amp;gt; &amp;#39;Why it matters&amp;#39; It doesn&amp;#39;t, it&amp;#39;s a corporate blog, they were rarely written in one-author&amp;#39;s voice anyway, but it&amp;#39;s interesting to see that even large organisations are outsourcing their blogs to LLMs.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48181853&quot; title=&quot;Sentence constructions like this definitely scream AI: &amp;#39;That&amp;#39;s a reasonable bias for an exploratory tool. It&amp;#39;s a ruinous one for a triage queue...&amp;#39; I will upgrade the &amp;#39;why it matters&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;and now AI output is part of the training data&amp;#39;. A day is coming when the punched-up AI verbiage will be the norm and hard to distinguish unless you&amp;#39;re from the previous generation. Sort of in the way that I miss some aspects of Usenet.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48182042&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s a scary thought, llm&amp;#39;s training on llm output. People trained by default of ubiquity to think and read llm output produce their own llm-esque writing. Seems stifling. We&amp;#39;ll need someway to reward human creativity and out-of-bounds thinking before our greatest corpus of human intellect is a bounded by whenever and whatever was trained on.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48181959&quot; title=&quot;I was expecting some more concrete numbers and surprises. It just seems like a balanced promotion article probably written using LLM itself.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find the technical insights on narrow-scoping prompts valuable for vulnerability research &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48187912&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Narrow scope produces better findings - Telling the model &amp;#39;Find vulnerabilities in this repository&amp;#39; makes it wander. Telling it &amp;#39;Look for command injection in this specific function, with this trust boundary above it, here&amp;#39;s the architecture document and here&amp;#39;s prior coverage of this area&amp;#39; makes it do something much closer to what a researcher would actually do.&amp;#39; So what, we take every function and every vulnerability type and just run the agents millions of times? I would expect Mythos to be…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue the post lacks concrete data on the severity of the flaws discovered &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48181358&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s great and all but how severe were the most severe vulnerabilities found? I imagine they don&amp;#39;t want to talk about it, but that&amp;#39;s really the most interesting and important bit.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48181959&quot; title=&quot;I was expecting some more concrete numbers and surprises. It just seems like a balanced promotion article probably written using LLM itself.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant point of contention involves the feasibility of two-hour patching SLAs, with warnings that such speed may necessitate skipping critical regression testing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48181632&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The loudest reaction to Mythos Preview from other security leaders has been about speed - scan faster, patch faster, compress the response cycle. More than one team we have spoken with is now operating under a two-hour SLA from CVE release to patch in production [...] If regression testing takes a day, you cannot get to a two-hour SLA without skipping it, and the bugs you ship when you skip regression testing tend to be worse than the bugs you were trying to patch. Over time, I wonder if…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://carette.xyz/posts/who_will_buy_your_services/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Who will buy your services if you fire us all?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (carette.xyz)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48185789&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;226 points · &lt;strong&gt;268 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by LucidLynx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that tech executives support Universal Basic Income not out of altruism, but as a self-preserving strategy to maintain a consumer base for AI services after automation eliminates the human jobs and wages necessary to fund the economy. &lt;a href=&quot;https://carette.xyz/posts/who_will_buy_your_services/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Who will buy your services if you fire us all?    URL Source: https://carette.xyz/posts/who_will_buy_your_services/    Published Time: 2026-05-18T23:00:00+02:00    Markdown Content:  Silicon Valley executives used to complain about “the Great Resignation” to justify replacing people with machines. Now, they have suddenly changed their tune to sound like generous givers. Figures like Sam Altman and Elon Musk now claim that [artificial intelligence will culminate in a liberated society…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are deeply skeptical of the idea that Universal Basic Income (UBI) will solve mass displacement, arguing that funding such a system would require doubling tax intakes and that the wealthy are more likely to let the working class suffer than to redistribute profits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48186307&quot; title=&quot;The author is so naive to think that after eliminating the dependency on labor that the wealthy class will launch UBI so that they will still have customers. What will happen is they will leave us to die.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48186514&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The government hands cash to displaced people, who immediately send that money right back to the tech companies to pay for subscriptions, automated food delivery, or digital entertainment. No plausible UBI system gives people so much money than they can relax and order food delivery while they watch all of their entertainment from their paid subscriptions. Funding UBI is extremely hard. We would have to more than double our tax intakes to even begin to give a reasonable UBI as a social…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48186715&quot; title=&quot;We already have abundance in some areas and very little of it results in a higher standard of living. We could make enough insulin to give it away to people for free. Instead people ration with negative consequences. We grow more than enough food but we throw a huge amount of it away. We have everything we need to house people, clothe them, feed them, and provide the basics of medical care. But we wont because theres too much money to be made otherwise.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that capital will continue to circulate through reinvestment in new industries and R&amp;amp;D &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48186737&quot; title=&quot;This is going to be an unpopular opinion, but here goes... The rise of AI does not mean that everyone will lose their jobs and the economy will collapse. That is an utter fallacy. It&amp;#39;s important to ask two questions:   - What happens to the workers?   - What happens to the capital? For the first category, it&amp;#39;s obvious. The workers lose their jobs. For the second category, the author and many others are under the presumption that the added value of the new added efficiency simply goes into some…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that without a functioning consumer economy, the &amp;#34;wealth&amp;#34; of the elite becomes meaningless numbers in a database protected only by fragile private security &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48186497&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d like to think that, if it comes to this scenario, the wealthy will have many things to worry about. Everyone will know, at that point, that *they&amp;#39; are the one who destroyed the global economy for short term wealth.  I&amp;#39;m not sure they&amp;#39;ve actually thought any of this through because they will be in a prison of their own making at that point.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48186487&quot; title=&quot;The “wealth” will mostly be numbers in a database without an economy. Sure, they could have an island or disaster shelter, huge, elaborate, and well stocked, and own lots of land, but even the land ownership is a paper filed in an office without a functioning government, which needs a functioning economy, to actually enforce keeping people off of the land. They can pay private security, but I feel like that has limits Essentially, I’m arguing they have more money than actual wealth, and they’re…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. A central debate persists over whether this technological shift is truly unprecedented or if, as in the past, new forms of labor will inevitably emerge to replace those lost to automation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48186524&quot; title=&quot;Real question: who honestly believes that labor is going away? Throughout history, technologists have promised that increased efficiency will mean that people can work fewer hours—or not at all. But it has never materialized. Not during the Industrial Revolution, not in the 1950s, not during the dawn of the Information Age. What makes us so confident that &amp;#39;this time it&amp;#39;s different?&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48186396&quot; title=&quot;...it does? This level of automation is recent, and industrialization is the blink of an eye in human history. If we&amp;#39;re talking shorter scale, people have traditionally hand-waived it with &amp;#39;Oh, these jobs will go away, but they&amp;#39;ll be replaced with other, higher-skilled jobs!&amp;#39;. That&amp;#39;s an economist&amp;#39;s idealism and doesn&amp;#39;t fit reality.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.404media.co/the-fbi-wants-to-buy-nationwide-access-to-license-plate-readers/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The FBI Wants to Buy Nationwide Access to License Plate Readers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (404media.co)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48184350&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;338 points · 146 comments · by cdrnsf&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FBI is seeking to purchase nationwide access to automated license plate readers, a move that would likely allow the agency to track vehicle movements across the country without a warrant. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.404media.co/the-fbi-wants-to-buy-nationwide-access-to-license-plate-readers/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The FBI Wants to Buy Nationwide Access to License Plate Readers    URL Source: https://www.404media.co/the-fbi-wants-to-buy-nationwide-access-to-license-plate-readers/    Published Time: 2026-05-18T18:19:45.000Z    Markdown Content:  # The FBI Wants to Buy Nationwide Access to License Plate Readers    Listen to the [404 Media Podcast](https://www.404media.co/the-404-media-podcast/)    [](https://www.404media.co/the-fbi-wants-to-buy-nationwide-access-to-license-plate-readers/)    ###### Account    *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The proposal for nationwide FBI access to license plate readers is viewed as a significant threat to privacy, with some arguing that personal data should be legally treated as a liability rather than an asset &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48185341&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s probably never going to happen because neither party cares about protecting Americans rights, but we need to have some sort of law that creates a Chinese firewall between these mass surveillance data and the government, or whoever else. I don&amp;#39;t know if you could ever collect this data and never have foreign entities or NSA moles infiltrate into it by sending their agents to work at that company and steal the data whenever they want. But I can see how this would be good at fighting crime…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48186668&quot; title=&quot;This will never change until we pass laws that make personal data a liability instead of an asset.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest that mass data collection should be banned entirely because it is too dangerous for both government and private entities to hold &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48185601&quot; title=&quot;Just don&amp;#39;t collect the data. If it&amp;#39;s too dangerous for the government to have then private companies shouldn&amp;#39;t have it either. The entire purpose of license plate readers is to assist law enforcement; if we decide as a society that we don&amp;#39;t want to do it then just ban it completely.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that banning cameras and character recognition is unrealistic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48186882&quot; title=&quot;You can&amp;#39;t realistically ban cameras and character recognition software.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also highlights practical limitations, such as the prevalence of obscured or fraudulent plates in certain regions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48185186&quot; title=&quot;In socal people might not even use license plates at all. Some people mask them with a towel or something like that. Some run paper dealership plates which I guess don&amp;#39;t need to have any license number on them at all, just the dealer logo. Others just take them off and drive. I&amp;#39;ve seen plates that were sanded clean and with different numbers stuck on them that don&amp;#39;t match then indented numbers. And then of course all the texas plates. No, it isn&amp;#39;t just visitors from texas. Texas has a cool…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt; and the ability of modern systems to identify vehicles by physical characteristics like dents or stickers even without a plate &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48186167&quot; title=&quot;Note that Flock says it can identify a car by physical characteristics from dents to bumper stickers.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://static1.squarespace.com/static/50363cf324ac8e905e7df861/t/6a0af5d0484fbf5fe9a7743e/1779103184855/2026-Spring-AI.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI eats the world (Spring 26) [pdf]&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (static1.squarespace.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48179021&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;303 points · 172 comments · by topherjaynes&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Benedict Evans’ May 2026 report explores generative AI as a massive platform shift, detailing a $700 billion capital expenditure surge and analyzing how automating &amp;#34;boring&amp;#34; tasks will reshape software, labor markets, and industry moats as innovation moves from infrastructure to specialized applications. &lt;a href=&quot;https://static1.squarespace.com/static/50363cf324ac8e905e7df861/t/6a0af5d0484fbf5fe9a7743e/1779103184855/2026-Spring-AI.pdf&quot; title=&quot;Title: 2026 Spring Final    URL Source: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/50363cf324ac8e905e7df861/t/6a0af5d0484fbf5fe9a7743e/1779103184855/2026-Spring-AI.pdf    Number of Pages: 79    Markdown Content:  Benedict Evans –– May 2020     # AI eats the world     Benedict Evans     May 2026     www.ben-evans.com Benedict Evans –– May 2026  2    Capital  Deployment  Change     AI eats the world Benedict Evans –– May 2026  3    # Capital Benedict Evans –– May 2026  4    Tech moves in platforms shifts     Every 10-15…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Benedict Evans’ latest presentation argues that AI models are trending toward commoditized infrastructure, shifting value toward application layers, proprietary data, and specific workflows &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48179651&quot; title=&quot;You can find the 4 versions of Benedict&amp;#39;s deck here: https://www.ben-evans.com/presentations I appreciate the temporal view into this thinking. My interpretation: Nov 2024: Don’t dismiss this; it may be the next platform shift. But the actual questions are still unsettled: scaling, usefulness, deployment, and business model. May 2025: The model layer is already showing signs of commoditization, so the important question shifts toward deployment: products, use cases, UX, errors, and enterprise…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48181521&quot; title=&quot;Thanks for the summary. I do love Benedict‘s work; I find he’s one of the few commentators who consistently strikes a balance between taking the transformative potential of AI seriously while not falling over into hype. Some things that stand out: * He’s really good with his historical analogies, especially looking at previous transformations like the early Internet and mobile; no surprise given that he has a history degree. * he emphasizes over and over how we have still have no idea how all…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users praise his historical perspective and balanced skepticism regarding AI&amp;#39;s current lack of product-market fit beyond chatbots &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48181521&quot; title=&quot;Thanks for the summary. I do love Benedict‘s work; I find he’s one of the few commentators who consistently strikes a balance between taking the transformative potential of AI seriously while not falling over into hype. Some things that stand out: * He’s really good with his historical analogies, especially looking at previous transformations like the early Internet and mobile; no surprise given that he has a history degree. * he emphasizes over and over how we have still have no idea how all…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others challenge his analogies, arguing that frontier models are more likely to form a &amp;#34;flywheel&amp;#34; monopoly similar to TSMC rather than becoming a utility like 5G data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48182917&quot; title=&quot;In slide 22, it compares LLM labs (OpenAI/Anthropic) to mobile data telecoms (AT&amp;amp;T, Verizon, TMobile) in 2010s. The difference is that mobile telecoms follow a standard (3G, 4G LTE, 5G) and there is little to no differentiation. It&amp;#39;s virtually the same no matter which company you choose or which country you travel to. A better comparison is actually AWS/Azure/Google Cloud/NeoClouds to AT&amp;amp;T and Verizon. The data centers follow a standard (CUDA/PyTorch/etc.) while OpenAI and Anthropic are…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion is also marked by a heated debate over Evans&amp;#39; credibility, with critics accusing him of previously &amp;#34;shilling&amp;#34; for cryptocurrency while he maintains he only analyzed it as a software platform &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48179593&quot; title=&quot;Didn&amp;#39;t Ben Evans previously shill for bitcoin, which is now omitted in the graphs for &amp;#39;disruptive technologies&amp;#39;? This is a marketing Gish Gallop talk that pretends to invalidate counterarguments with a couple of fantasy graphs.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48180227&quot; title=&quot;It is an indisputable fact that you spent years shilling crypto. Why even deny that or threaten(!) someone pointing it out? It was/is a huge, verifiable chunk of your public output.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48180409&quot; title=&quot;No, it&amp;#39;s a really stupid lie. You can look at all my essays and presentations online. I&amp;#39;ve spent some time discussing why people are interested in blockchains as software platforms, and what would be good and bad arguments around that. But I&amp;#39;ve never suggested anyone buy a token - indeed, I was pretty vocal in pointing to speculative bubbles and silly ideas, like NFTs.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48180437&quot; title=&quot;Here you go: https://en.cryptonomist.ch/2018/11/01/benedict-evans-cryptoc...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Finally, some commenters express existential dread, suggesting that the unchecked expansion of AI data centers could eventually &amp;#34;crowd out&amp;#34; human life and the natural world &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48179806&quot; title=&quot;It will literally eat the world. Just like we crowded out wild animals in a few reserved areas, so will AI data centers crowd us out. To quite Ilya Sutskever: &amp;gt; I think it’s pretty likely the entire surface of the earth will be covered with solar panels and data centers.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;[&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://clickclickclick.click/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Click (2016)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (clickclickclick.click)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48187054&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;369 points · 100 comments · by andrewzeno&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#34;ClickClickClick.click&amp;#34; is an interactive browser-based experiment that highlights the extent of online tracking by providing a real-time, narrated commentary on every movement, click, and behavior a user performs on the page. &lt;a href=&quot;https://clickclickclick.click/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Click    URL Source: https://clickclickclick.click/    Published Time: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 08:28:57 GMT    Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.  Warning: This is a cached snapshot of the original page, consider retry with caching opt-out.    Markdown Content:&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The use of session-replay tools highlights a &amp;#34;creepy&amp;#34; disconnect between technical data collection and user expectations of privacy, often likened to the social norm of having a &amp;#34;private conversation in a public restaurant&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48187537&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve always added analytics scripts on websites I worked on. It was second nature for me. Then when I got my own start up, I didn&amp;#39;t just add regular analytics but one that tracks mouse movements so you can watch sessions back like a video [0]. I told a friend about my start up and she jumped on it immediately. I opened the tool and watched her interaction. Then I told her &amp;#39;oh so you opened the dev tools&amp;#39; She immediately ended the session. &amp;#39;How did you know? That&amp;#39;s creepy&amp;#39;. It was the first time…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48187585&quot; title=&quot;I think there&amp;#39;s a very interesting duality forming around privacy. It seems like most people don&amp;#39;t really care if they&amp;#39;re being filmed, or if their data is being slurped up six ways from Sunday, as long as it&amp;#39;s aggregated and going through automated systems. But as soon as it feels like an actual person is looking at individual behavior, it&amp;#39;s creepy (which is, of course, always a possibility, but plausible deniability is a powerful thing).&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48188017&quot; title=&quot;Yes. This is it. People are used to &amp;#39;private conversation in public restaurant&amp;#39;. It&amp;#39;s not private because no one can hear, but because no one is listening.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While developers often rely on Terms and Conditions for legal cover, commenters argue these are ineffective because users rarely read them, may not understand the implications, or are forced to agree under &amp;#34;duress&amp;#34; to access essential services &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48187921&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Yeah, we include it in our terms and condition and privacy page Please be honest with yourself. People don&amp;#39;t read terms and conditions. There&amp;#39;s a good chance you don&amp;#39;t read terms and conditions. And even if you do, odds are better than even that you don&amp;#39;t fully understand all the legal implications. Terms and conditions pages nowadays are there mostly to provide legal protection under the guise of &amp;#39;the user told us that they read these by ticking a box on our signup page; it&amp;#39;s hardly our…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48188167&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m also of the opinion that at lot of T&amp;amp;C are basically signing under duress and I consider them invalid. Like if I have to sign a T&amp;amp;C with Google Play and a T&amp;amp;C with your city&amp;#39;s sanctioned parking app in order to park on the street, I consider both of those T&amp;amp;C&amp;#39;s invalid. As a legal resident of the country with a legally owned car and legal driving license, I should be able to park and pay, I shouldn&amp;#39;t have to agree to anything else.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48187893&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It seems like most people don&amp;#39;t really care if they&amp;#39;re being filmed, or if their data is being slurped up six ways from Sunday For the majority of people I don’t think it’s true that they don’t care, but rather that they don’t know, don’t understand the implications, or don’t have the luxury of being able to do anything about it. In the instances where I was able to have a longer discussion with someone to really explain what’s going on, they did care. Even if they previously said they didn’t.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a sharp disagreement over the necessity of these agreements; some view them as vital frameworks for business-customer expectations, while others see them as a way to mechanize &amp;#34;maliciously creepy&amp;#34; behavior at scale without accountability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48188877&quot; title=&quot;Look, I understand the hate against terms and conditions. They&amp;#39;re not a lot of fun. But the alternative is worse. Let&amp;#39;s imagine a world where terms and conditions don&amp;#39;t apply; Firstly, businesses can do whatever they like. There are no terms to agree to. They simply function in whatever way they &amp;#39;consider to be valid&amp;#39;. If a customer disagrees with what is valid or not, hey, that&amp;#39;s what courts are for. And given there&amp;#39;s no agreement between business and customer, who&amp;#39;s to say who is right? The…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48188069&quot; title=&quot;Right, the very nature of human society for the last several thousand years has been privacy in public. You walk around outside where everyone can see you, but the societal expectation is that you don&amp;#39;t watch others. You have conversations in public because that&amp;#39;s where life happens, but they&amp;#39;re still private conversations. Every counter-example to this is people being intentionally creepy, inappropriate, or outright malicious. Which was a manageable problem when it was just a single dude being…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-17</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-17</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.mozilla.org/netpolicy/2026/05/15/mozilla-to-uk-regulators-vpns-are-essential-privacy-and-security-tools-and-should-not-be-undermined/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mozilla to UK regulators: VPNs are essential privacy and security tools&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.mozilla.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48166459&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;690 points · 286 comments · by WithinReason&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mozilla has urged UK regulators to reject proposals for age-gating VPNs, arguing that restricting access to these essential privacy and security tools undermines fundamental rights and fails to address the root causes of online harm for young people. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.mozilla.org/netpolicy/2026/05/15/mozilla-to-uk-regulators-vpns-are-essential-privacy-and-security-tools-and-should-not-be-undermined/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Mozilla to UK regulators: VPNs are essential privacy and security tools and should not be undermined  – Open Policy &amp;amp; Advocacy    URL Source: https://blog.mozilla.org/netpolicy/2026/05/15/mozilla-to-uk-regulators-vpns-are-essential-privacy-and-security-tools-and-should-not-be-undermined/    Published Time: Mon, 18 May 2026 05:58:38 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Mozilla to UK regulators: VPNs are essential privacy and security tools and should not be undermined - Open Policy &amp;amp;…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate centers on whether online safety is a parental responsibility or a government mandate, with some arguing that state intervention erodes fundamental freedoms and reduces parents to mere &amp;#34;donors&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48167674&quot; title=&quot;Individualistic societies alienating child-parent relationships and reducing parents to sperm/egg/money donors are slowly starting to fall apart. Do you know who&amp;#39;s responsible to make sure children are safe online? Their parents. Not big tech, not the government, and not me by way of giving up my freedoms.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48167725&quot; title=&quot;This is the way! It is frightening how eagerly parents want to give up freedom for everyone, in return for not having to care about their offspring and the illusion of 100% safety. I think the authoritarian trend accelerated during corona. Our western political nobility got a real taste for power, and they have not been able to free themselves from that afrodisiac ever since. Therefore chat control, 1, 2, 3, and when that didn&amp;#39;t go as planned... lo and behold... age verification, and that of…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168101&quot; title=&quot;“Properly” is the choice of the parent, except in some narrow cases we’ve defined culturally. The last thing we need is society deciding in detail how children should be raised. CPS horror stories are bad enough as it is.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users contend that society must protect children when parents fail &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48167937&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m against any kind of age verification legislation, but this is a really bad argument. It doesn&amp;#39;t answer the question of &amp;#39;what do we do about parents that don&amp;#39;t do their job properly.&amp;#39; In theory, one could implement age verification by negligent parent imprisonment, in practice, I don&amp;#39;t think that would work, and definitely not in all cases. If we accept the premise that children having unfettered access to the internet is a bad thing (which, again, I don&amp;#39;t think we should), there have to be…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169103&quot; title=&quot;Nevertheless as a society we do have laws protecting the children, also the adults, on the streets. Why not having or applying laws for the online? Why should we expect or ask that the internet be magically better handled by the parents alone?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others warn that the UK&amp;#39;s regulatory push mirrors a &amp;#34;1984&amp;#34; style digital roadmap driven by commercial interests and a desire for total surveillance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48166912&quot; title=&quot;1984 was meant to be a warning, not the UK’s digital infrastructure roadmap&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48167460&quot; title=&quot;I have seen some of the inside of this and it&amp;#39;s not quite as clear cut. One side of this is driven by a bunch of not too reputable think tanks behind the scenes who persuaded a couple of fringe academics to agree with them and push for it via the civil service. The government is taking bad, paid for advice. I don&amp;#39;t know what the agenda is there but there is one and I reckon it&amp;#39;s commercial. Probably a consortium of businesses wanting to create a market they can get into. However the security…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48166894&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; VPNs are essential privacy tools Does Mozilla not understand that this is the exact reason why the UK wants to forbid them?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a cynical consensus that many citizens will trade their rights for perceived safety or stability, leading to a gradual, &amp;#34;ordinary&amp;#34; erosion of privacy that mirrors authoritarian models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48167725&quot; title=&quot;This is the way! It is frightening how eagerly parents want to give up freedom for everyone, in return for not having to care about their offspring and the illusion of 100% safety. I think the authoritarian trend accelerated during corona. Our western political nobility got a real taste for power, and they have not been able to free themselves from that afrodisiac ever since. Therefore chat control, 1, 2, 3, and when that didn&amp;#39;t go as planned... lo and behold... age verification, and that of…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48167705&quot; title=&quot;1984 is extremely naive. It assumes that people will fight for their freedom and insane measures will be needed to keep them in check. So foolishly optimistic… people can’t wait to give freedom away if only they get a stable job and housing in exchange. Or if it hits these other guys they don’t like at the moment. It’s all much, much less dramatic than Orwell. It is an ordinary, everyday erosion of your rights until one day you will realize that you lost something very important but it will be…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://frederickvanbrabant.com/blog/2026-05-15-i-dont-think-ai-will-make-your-processes-go-faster/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I don&amp;#39;t think AI will make your processes go faster&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (frederickvanbrabant.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168221&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;543 points · 377 comments · by TheEdonian&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that AI will not speed up organizational processes because the true bottleneck is often poor documentation and vague requirements rather than the speed of execution. &lt;a href=&quot;https://frederickvanbrabant.com/blog/2026-05-15-i-dont-think-ai-will-make-your-processes-go-faster/&quot; title=&quot;Title: I don&amp;#39;t think AI will make your processes go faster    URL Source: https://frederickvanbrabant.com/blog/2026-05-15-i-dont-think-ai-will-make-your-processes-go-faster/    Published Time: Sun, 17 May 2026 13:59:13 GMT    Markdown Content:  I have the feeling that every organization out there is, at least partially, focusing on process optimization, something that often happens when the market is down. These days there is also the AI angle to the entire thing, and the unrealistic expectations that…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether AI truly accelerates software development or merely shifts the bottleneck, with many arguing that the primary constraint remains the translation of vague requirements into precise specifications &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168543&quot; title=&quot;I think when LLMs first came out people thought they could just say something like, &amp;#39;Make a Facebook clone&amp;#39;. But now we&amp;#39;re realizing we need to be more exact with our requirements and define things better. That has always been the bottle neck in software. When I was working we used to get requirements that literally said things like, &amp;#39;Get data and give it to the user&amp;#39;. No definition of what data is, where its stored, or in what format to return it. We would then spend a significant amount of…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48170177&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This exact thing is what software developers have been begging for since the beginning of the profession: Receiving a detailed outline of the problem and what the end result should look like. &amp;gt; This is often the part that slows down software development. Trying to figure out what a vague, title only, feature request actually means. But that is exactly what Software Engineering is!. It&amp;#39;s 2026 and the notion that you can get detailed enough requirements and specifications that you can one-shot…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see PMs using AI to generate richer, more detailed tickets as a major efficiency gain &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169391&quot; title=&quot;In what I&amp;#39;ve seen, tickets are much richer in detail now because PMs are using AI (connected to the codebase itself, like Claude Code or Codex) to fill out a template as to what and why the problem is (ie X field exists in the backend not frontend), how and where to get any data (query the backend), and what acceptance criteria is needed (frontend should have the field exposed and &amp;#39;submit&amp;#39; should push the field&amp;#39;s data to the backend where it should show up in the databas), which is something…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169445&quot; title=&quot;The PMs validate it, why do you think they don&amp;#39;t read over it to make sure it fits what they want? You might say &amp;#39;well they&amp;#39;re lazy, look why they didn&amp;#39;t write enough detail to start off with&amp;#39; but for lots of people, reviewing something to make sure it&amp;#39;s close to what they want and then tweaking it is much easier than writing it from scratch. It&amp;#39;s the equivalent of writer&amp;#39;s block and is why a common advice given to writers is to put anything they can onto the page then edit it later.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others warn that this can lead to a &amp;#34;garbage in, garbage out&amp;#34; cycle where unvalidated, AI-generated inaccuracies are baked into the codebase &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169427&quot; title=&quot;Except... no one validates the generated tickets, and it&amp;#39;s full of inaccuracies. And then someone copy pastes it into  Claude and now those inaccuracies become part of the code and tests.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169649&quot; title=&quot;I can&amp;#39;t imagine SWEs will be reduced to SDETs anymore than attorneys will be reduced to spell-checkers on AI powered case briefs. I am a very AI-forward person, but hallucinations are becoming more pernicious than ever even as they get less frequent, especially if the code actually works. A human absolutely has to guide these processes at a macro level for  sustainability for SaaS as it evolves with business needs. Maybe for one and done systems with no maintenance/no updates/no security…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant disagreement over current capabilities: some point to failures in complex tasks like building a C compiler as proof that human supervision is still essential &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48170244&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s 2026 and the notion that you can get detailed enough requirements and specifications that you can one-shot a perfect solution needs to die. It&amp;#39;s 2026 and the idea that even with detailed-enough requirements you can one-shot even a workable (let alone perfect) solution also needs to die. Anthropic failed to build even something as simple as a workable C compiler, not only with a perfect spec ( and reference implementations, both of which the model trained on ) but even with thousands of…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, while others view those same experiments as evidence of rapid, transformative progress &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48170563&quot; title=&quot;Sorry where are we seeing that it failed? It compiled multiple projects successfully albeit less optimized. &amp;#39;  It lacks the 16-bit x86 compiler that is necessary to boot Linux out of real mode. For this, it calls out to GCC (the x86_32 and x86_64 compilers are its own). It does not have its own assembler and linker; these are the very last bits that Claude started automating and are still somewhat buggy. The demo video was produced with a GCC assembler and linker. The compiler successfully…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48170303&quot; title=&quot;Most software is much simpler than a c compiler.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, consensus leans toward AI being highly effective for automating &amp;#34;chore&amp;#34; tasks and rapid iteration, provided humans remain in control of high-level alignment and coordination [&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.techspot.com/news/112410-security-researcher-microsoft-secretly-built-backdoor-bitlocker-releases.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Security researcher says Microsoft built a Bitlocker backdoor, releases exploit&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techspot.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168856&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;559 points · 257 comments · by nolok&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A security researcher has released the &amp;#34;YellowKey&amp;#34; exploit, which allegedly bypasses Microsoft’s BitLocker encryption on Windows 11 using a USB drive and the Windows Recovery Environment. The researcher claims the flaw is an intentional backdoor because the vulnerability only exists in official Windows recovery images. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.techspot.com/news/112410-security-researcher-microsoft-secretly-built-backdoor-bitlocker-releases.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: A security researcher says Microsoft secretly built a backdoor into BitLocker, releases an exploit to prove it    URL Source: https://www.techspot.com/news/112410-security-researcher-microsoft-secretly-built-backdoor-bitlocker-releases.html    Published Time: 2026-05-14T12:45:00-05:00    Markdown Content:  # A security researcher says Microsoft secretly built a backdoor into BitLocker, releases an exploit to prove it | TechSpot    *   [Login](https://www.techspot.com/community/login/)  *   - [x] …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The disclosure of a purported BitLocker backdoor appears to be a &amp;#34;crashout&amp;#34; by a researcher who claims a broken agreement with Microsoft left them homeless &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169219&quot; title=&quot;Seems this traces back almost a week, from Nightmare-Eclipse who is the researcher who found this: Tuesday, 12 May 2026 - &amp;#39;Here are the links, yes, two vulnerabilities this time [YellowKey] [GreenPlasma] [...] Next patch tuesday will have a big surprise for you Microsoft&amp;#39; Wednesday, 13 May 2026 - &amp;#39;I can&amp;#39;t wait when I will be allowed to disclose the full story, I think people will find my crashout very reasonable and it definitely won&amp;#39;t be a good look for Microsoft.&amp;#39; Author&amp;#39;s blog:…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169689&quot; title=&quot;How would that leave them homeless?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169816&quot; title=&quot;Presumably, not paying out for these bugs which often take weeks of research to find.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some speculate the author is a disgruntled insider or a frustrated participant in the bug bounty process, others suggest the erratic nature of the disclosure points to underlying mental health struggles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169343&quot; title=&quot;I read it as the author is / was going through the vulnerability disclosure process with Microsoft and they&amp;#39;re annoyed for unclear reasons and decided to publicly disclose, rather than being an insider.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171153&quot; title=&quot;Many brilliant people have serious mental health issues that preclude their ability to regulate their emotions and act maturely in serious situations e.g. responsible vulnerability disclosure. I&amp;#39;ve watched genius-level IQ people get fired time and again because they don&amp;#39;t know how to work with others at a basic kindergarten level.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169929&quot; title=&quot;Who in their right mind bets on bug bounties to cover their basic needs? They should be highly employable with these kind of skills.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The technical fallout has reignited debates over the reliability of proprietary encryption, with some users preferring unencrypted drives for data recovery and others recommending a shift to audited open-source alternatives like VeraCrypt &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169083&quot; title=&quot;Maybe I’m an outlier but I don’t want my drives encrypted at all. I rather have all my data be accessible if things go catastrophic, I.E. having to pull the drive out of a broken computer and put it in another computer to access the files. I just want it to be plug and play.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169373&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Security professionals generally recommend avoiding reliance on any single encryption system and instead evaluating well-reviewed full-disk encryption alternatives such as VeraCrypt&amp;#39;. If they put a backdoor into FDE it would make more sense to advise people to stop using windows at all and using Linux instead. If they put a backdoor in FDE you can be sure there is not just one backdoor in the operating system itself. You shouldn&amp;#39;t trust proprietary software at all. You shouldn&amp;#39;t even trust…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169432&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t use Microsoft products generally but not with even with your computer would I run VeraCrypt.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thestateofbrand.com/news/ai-subscription-time-bomb&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI subscriptions are a ticking time bomb for enterprise&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (thestateofbrand.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168056&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;385 points · 380 comments · by mooreds&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Major AI providers are heavily subsidizing enterprise subscriptions at a loss to gain market share, creating a &amp;#34;ticking time bomb&amp;#34; for companies that have integrated these tools into workflows before an inevitable shift toward much higher, usage-based pricing. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thestateofbrand.com/news/ai-subscription-time-bomb&quot; title=&quot;Title: Every AI Subscription Is a Ticking Time Bomb for Enterprise    URL Source: https://www.thestateofbrand.com/news/ai-subscription-time-bomb    Published Time: Sun, 17 May 2026 22:44:27 GMT    Markdown Content:  Every AI lab is losing money serving your company right now. They know it. And they are doing it on purpose.    OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and the rest are running an industry-wide loss-leader program at a scale that has no precedent. They are selling enterprises filet mignon at gas station…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether the high cost of AI subscriptions is sustainable, with some arguing that local models will soon match frontier performance and eliminate the need for enterprise subscriptions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169256&quot; title=&quot;Every AI subscription is a ticking time bomb for the frontier provider; within a few years we will be running local models as good as today’s frontier models with almost no cost burden. The floor will fall out of the enterprise market for all the frontier companies.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169778&quot; title=&quot;Local modals are 6 months to 18 months behind frontier. Even if the performance of a cloud model is faster, it&amp;#39;s clear that local is catching up.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some skeptics point to high RAM requirements and massive infrastructure investments as barriers to local or profitable hosting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169716&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; within a few years we will be running local models as good as today’s frontier models with almost no cost burden Based on what? The RAM requirements alone are extraordinary. No, running large models on shared, dedicated hosted hardware at full utilization is going to be vastly more cost-efficient for the foreseeable future.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168638&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s like witnessing a rocket using the most powerful engine on Earth then once it escaped orbit turn off the engine and said &amp;#39;It is flying without power!&amp;#39;. Yes, sure, right now it is ... but that&amp;#39;s NOT how it got here. There are trillions invested to recoup and at most billions in sales. It doesn&amp;#39;t add up to tokens making a profit any time soon.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others highlight that rapid algorithmic breakthroughs and hardware improvements have already slashed inference costs by over 5x year-over-year &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48170715&quot; title=&quot;This kind of scarce thinking is almost always wrong and will lead you to down a sad dark HN loser path. Tokens will get cheaper. It costs OpenAI less money to serve GPT-5.5 than GPT-4. Ppl don&amp;#39;t understand how much efficiency gains are being made with algo breakthroughs as well as hardware improvements that counter balance the demand rise. Open source models are 3-6 months behind. The world is your oyster stop worrying about how things will go wrong start thinking about what you can do today so…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171036&quot; title=&quot;GPT-4 (original API): Input: $30 / 1M tokens Output: $60 / 1M tokens GPT-5.5: Input: $5 / 1M tokens Output: $30 / 1M tokens Costs have been reducing by over 5x year over year. Inference cost concern is mostly performative. https://simianwords.bearblog.dev/conclusive-proofs-that-llm-... Edit: can&amp;#39;t reply but companies aren&amp;#39;t selling inference at loss. In the blog post I point to third party hosting of open models like Deepseek which are also going down. They are not VC backed. I also point to…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Amidst debates over whether token sales are currently profitable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168425&quot; title=&quot;Brad Gerstner confirmed that tokens aren&amp;#39;t being sold at a loss. Whatever the formula, API + Subscription split, the companies are making a profit on net token sale. They maybe running at loss after all the salaries and stock comp, but tokens are in profit now.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171036&quot; title=&quot;GPT-4 (original API): Input: $30 / 1M tokens Output: $60 / 1M tokens GPT-5.5: Input: $5 / 1M tokens Output: $30 / 1M tokens Costs have been reducing by over 5x year over year. Inference cost concern is mostly performative. https://simianwords.bearblog.dev/conclusive-proofs-that-llm-... Edit: can&amp;#39;t reply but companies aren&amp;#39;t selling inference at loss. In the blog post I point to third party hosting of open models like Deepseek which are also going down. They are not VC backed. I also point to…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, some contributors suggest the entire market is precarious because AI remains a non-essential tool that businesses could easily function without &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48170188&quot; title=&quot;The entire problem with &amp;#39;AI&amp;#39; is that it&amp;#39;s easy to do without. The AI companies know it, the users know it - even the most pro AI agent manager knows it. Thought experiment: remove AI from the world right now, all of it - what do you have? Business as usual. This article doesn&amp;#39;t do enough to underscore that - dreaded be the day I need to get an actual engineer to review a PR, right?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stateofsurveillance.org/news/flock-cameras-destroyed-nationwide-ice-backlash-2026/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;At least 25 Flock cameras have been destroyed in five states since April 2025&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (stateofsurveillance.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48170798&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;422 points · 313 comments · by rolph&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since April 2025, at least 25 Flock Safety surveillance cameras have been destroyed across five states as public backlash grows over the company’s ties to federal immigration enforcement and the bypass of local privacy concerns. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stateofsurveillance.org/news/flock-cameras-destroyed-nationwide-ice-backlash-2026/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Americans Are Smashing Flock Cameras. The Surveillance State Has a Sabotage Problem.    URL Source: https://stateofsurveillance.org/news/flock-cameras-destroyed-nationwide-ice-backlash-2026/    Published Time: 2026-02-24    Markdown Content:  **TL;DR:** People across the United States are cutting down, smashing, and dismantling Flock Safety surveillance cameras. At least 25 cameras have been destroyed in five states since April 2025. One Virginia man faces 25 criminal charges for systematically…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some argue that destroying surveillance cameras is a futile gesture that justifies further crackdowns, others contend that direct action increases the economic risk of installation and has historically been a more effective catalyst for social change than slow-moving legislation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171028&quot; title=&quot;Eventually toll cameras and a consortium of private businesses will have this tech and then game over. Better to use this energy and legislate the behavior you want. Never let the enemy decide the terms.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171088&quot; title=&quot;The irony is destruction of private property will only justify the very surveillance one is trying to avoid. Would you agree ring cameras should be destroyed too? The police can use their footage. In practice they are similar to flock.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171149&quot; title=&quot;Kinda like saying &amp;#39;Throwing the British&amp;#39;s tea into Boston harbor will only make us subject to harsher terms.&amp;#39; The reality is the vast majority of social progress in the last millenium was achieved with force and threat of force. I find this weird revisionist &amp;#39;violence is never the answer&amp;#39; trope recited as a fact that needs no justification to be incredibly weird and unreliable.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171204&quot; title=&quot;Smashing cameras is enjoyable whereas building movement for legislation is laborious. It will be easier to negotiate for legislation as well if the economic risk of installation increases because of vandalism.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Skeptics point out that 25 cameras is a statistically insignificant &amp;#34;drop in the bucket,&amp;#34; especially since over half were attributed to a single individual &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48170880&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;At least 25 cameras have been destroyed&amp;#39;.  Sounds like a mere drop in the bucket.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171555&quot; title=&quot;25 cameras destroyed over the course of a year, and more than half were destroyed by a single person. This doesn&amp;#39;t appear to be a widespread concern the headline makes it out to be.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights a divide between those who see the article as a necessary call to action against &amp;#34;Trojan horse&amp;#34; surveillance and those who view it as an attempt to normalize property destruction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48170921&quot; title=&quot;The author wants them smashed. The point of the article is to attempt to normalize and provide justification for the behavior, so that more people feel OK doing it.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48170951&quot; title=&quot;Speed cameras and other surveillance state Trojan horses next please. Not just flock.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://justsitandgrin.im/posts/native-all-the-way-until-you-need-text/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Native all the way, until you need text&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (justsitandgrin.im)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168058&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;410 points · 274 comments · by dive&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A veteran developer argues that Apple’s native frameworks like SwiftUI and TextKit struggle with complex rich text and Markdown rendering, leading many creators to choose Electron or WebKit for superior performance, typography, and text handling in chat-heavy applications. &lt;a href=&quot;https://justsitandgrin.im/posts/native-all-the-way-until-you-need-text/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Native all the way, until you need text | Artem Loenko    URL Source: https://justsitandgrin.im/posts/native-all-the-way-until-you-need-text/    Published Time: 2026-05-17T10:07:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  I have been a native macOS / iOS developer for almost twenty years, and I want to say something about the usual “Oh, it is Node / Electron again… what a shame…” reaction.    Recently, I tried to implement a simple chat with Markdown support in a pure Swift / SwiftUI app. And honestly, it is…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the difficulty of rendering rich text natively, with some arguing that WebKit is a logical choice for Markdown since the format was designed for HTML &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168455&quot; title=&quot;If you&amp;#39;re on macOS, WebKit is a native OS framework. Using WebKit to render Markdown seems completely appropriate. Now, if you&amp;#39;re rendering everything with WebKit, that&amp;#39;s ridiculous, in the same way rendering everything with PDFKit would be ridiculous. But for a Markdown view, WebKit seems like a logical choice. There&amp;#39;s no need to subsequently flip the table and replace everything with a Chromium web app.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169035&quot; title=&quot;markdown is a markup language &amp;#39;intended&amp;#39; to be rendered as HTML, WebKit seems appropriate to render HTML&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users claim modern browser engines now rival native performance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168550&quot; title=&quot;Usually performance was the reason for using native APIs rather than web views, but this doesn&amp;#39;t seem to be true any more. Browser rendering engines are pretty mature at this point, with significant GPU acceleration, and over a decade stress-testing by bloated web apps. Meanwhile SwiftUI doesn&amp;#39;t feel particularly fast. Apple&amp;#39;s latest and greatest rewrite of System Preferences has dumbed down the UI to mostly rows of checkboxes, and yet switching between sections can lag worse than loading web…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169078&quot; title=&quot;This is the ActiveX/nacl/wasm/etc... argument recapitulated.  For decades, people dithered about how to get fast code into browser environments such that it could be deployed safely. Then the V8 team at Google just asked &amp;#39;well, what if we just made Javascript crazy fast instead?&amp;#39;, and here we are.  There&amp;#39;s still room for native code in environments that don&amp;#39;t map nicely to scalar scripting languages, but not a lot of room.  Basically everyone is best served by ignoring that the problem ever…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that well-engineered native apps remain significantly faster and more memory-efficient than web-based alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168898&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s SwiftUI that is at fault here[1][2], not native apps in general. I wrote my native app in Qt C++ and QML and showed that it is *significantly* faster and uses significantly less RAM than similar web apps[3]. So, no, web apps, in general, are slower and uses more resources than well-engineered native apps. [1] https://notes.alinpanaitiu.com/SwiftUI%20is%20convenient,%20... [2] https://x.com/daniel_nguyenx/status/1734495508746702936 [3] https://rubymamistvalove.com/block-editor#8-performance&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168826&quot; title=&quot;Now RAM use is the main reason to prefer native APIs over web views.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable anecdotes include a developer achieving sub-8ms restyling for a 5,000-line file using TextKit 2 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169377&quot; title=&quot;I recently launched a text editor for iOS that uses TextKit 2 and is highly performant with files of 5,000 lines (I tested with Moby Dick from Project Gutenberg). I made it between Aug 2025 and Apr 2026, development is ongoing. Every keystroke is restyled in under 8ms: no debouncing, no delayed rendering. 20 rapid keystrokes are processed in 150ms with full restyling after each one. Tag and boolean searches complete in under 20ms. Visible-range rendering is 25x faster than full-document…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, contrasted with the &amp;#34;nightmare&amp;#34; of trying to implement simple clickable links in early iOS development &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168390&quot; title=&quot;I remember being a junior engineer in 2015, and being asked to render a clickable link within a paragraph in an iOS app. Swift had just been released so we were still entirely on the ObjC/UIKit stack. It was an absolute nightmare. I _barely_ managed to make it work. I haven&amp;#39;t really touched iOS since about 2016, so I assumed the new SwiftUI stuff would have this stuff built in. Obviously. Kind of insane that it wasn&amp;#39;t.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.williamangel.net/blog/2026/05/17/offline-llm-energy-use.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apple Silicon costs more than OpenRouter&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (williamangel.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168198&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;310 points · 264 comments · by datadrivenangel&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Running local AI models on Apple Silicon is estimated to be three times more expensive than using OpenRouter, as high hardware depreciation and electricity costs outweigh the savings of offline inference. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.williamangel.net/blog/2026/05/17/offline-llm-energy-use.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Apple Silicon costs more than OpenRouter    URL Source: https://www.williamangel.net/blog/2026/05/17/offline-llm-energy-use.html    Markdown Content:  ## Offline Agentic Coding part 3: Apple Silicon costs more than OpenRouter.    ### Published 2026-05-17    ![Image 1: Apple silicon costs more than open router. Spreadsheet showing tokens per second and costs to show overall cost per million tokens.](https://www.williamangel.net/blog/2026/05/17/2026-05-17-offline-llm-energy-use.png)    Apple silicon…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Critics argue the analysis is flawed because it inflates electricity costs and assumes a Mac would be used as a dedicated 24/7 server, rather than a multi-purpose device that provides value beyond inference &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168433&quot; title=&quot;This isn&amp;#39;t a good analysis, and it&amp;#39;s because it keeps rounding everything up. He rounds up the cost of electricity by 10%. He has a range of power use, takes the high end (which is 2x the low end) and multiplies it by the inflated electricity cost. But then they talk about using a newly purchased Mac to do the inference, running at full capacity, 24/7. Why would you do that? Apple silicon is fast but the author points out: you&amp;#39;re only getting 10-40 tokens per second. It&amp;#39;s not bad, but it&amp;#39;s not…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168387&quot; title=&quot;Unless I&amp;#39;m misunderstanding, this is counting the entire laptop in the cost of generating tokens. The calculation seems to omit that, in addition to receiving LLM output, you have also received a laptop in exchange for your money. If you intend to put this machine in a dark corner and run it solely as a token-munching server, a laptop would be an exceptionally poor choice of technology for this purpose. But if you intend to use the laptop as a laptop, having a laptop is a pretty big benefit…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users point out that even optimistic calculations show OpenRouter is slightly cheaper &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168542&quot; title=&quot;Rounding everything down in the most optimistic setting got me to $0.40 per million tokens, and openrouter has the same model at $.38/mtok.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that frontier AI companies are currently selling tokens at a loss to capture market share &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169040&quot; title=&quot;Frontier AI companies are selling at a loss. Excusing everything else that u/bastawhiz said[0]; the obvious fact here is that Claude, OpenAI, Gemini et al. are quite literally burning through 100&amp;#39;s of billions of dollars and selling it back to you for pennies on the dollar in the hopes that they get to be the only one left. If I spend $10 growing Oranges and sell them to you for $1; then of course it&amp;#39;s more expensive for you to do the growing. I feel like I&amp;#39;m taking crazy pills. These models…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169158&quot; title=&quot;Profitable for inference if you completely ignore training costs and that you absolutely must continuously train new models.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents of local hardware emphasize that owning the device offers long-term benefits like privacy, freedom from censorship, and residual hardware value that API services cannot match &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48170151&quot; title=&quot;But once all that is done you still own a Mac in one case, and you don’t in the other, correct?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48170282&quot; title=&quot;Yea this; it’s the same reason why mortgaging is cheaper than renting&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168387&quot; title=&quot;Unless I&amp;#39;m misunderstanding, this is counting the entire laptop in the cost of generating tokens. The calculation seems to omit that, in addition to receiving LLM output, you have also received a laptop in exchange for your money. If you intend to put this machine in a dark corner and run it solely as a token-munching server, a laptop would be an exceptionally poor choice of technology for this purpose. But if you intend to use the laptop as a laptop, having a laptop is a pretty big benefit…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://daringfireball.net/2026/05/ai_is_technology_not_a_product&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI is a technology not a product&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (daringfireball.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168626&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;381 points · 165 comments · by ch_sm&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;John Gruber argues that AI is a pervasive underlying technology rather than a standalone product, dismissing claims that Apple needs a &amp;#34;killer AI device&amp;#34; to replace the iPhone ecosystem by the end of the decade. &lt;a href=&quot;https://daringfireball.net/2026/05/ai_is_technology_not_a_product&quot; title=&quot;Title: AI Is Technology, Not a Product    URL Source: https://daringfireball.net/2026/05/ai_is_technology_not_a_product    Markdown Content:  Steven Levy, writing for Wired last month after Apple’s CEO transition was announced, under the provocative headline “[Apple’s Next CEO Needs to Launch a Killer AI Product](https://www.wired.com/story/apples-next-ceo-needs-to-launch-a-killer-ai-product/)” ([News+ link](https://apple.news/AdCC7y43rTQq6SZH2bDmqxA) to get around Wired’s miserly paywall):    &amp;gt; Much…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The consensus among commenters is that AI should be treated as an underlying technology to improve existing user experiences—such as making Siri more intuitive—rather than being marketed as a standalone product &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169595&quot; title=&quot;Agreed. The ideal implementation of AI for Apple is probably to finally make Siri work. This isn’t necessary fancy, just let me set some calendar events without knowing the magic words or tell it to open Overcast and play the new Gastropod episode. Better yet, for power users, let me set up reusable shortcuts using natural language. The most important part of this is it doesn’t necessarily feel like AI. The user does not like AI for its own sake or the weirdos who ramble about putting them into…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169141&quot; title=&quot;Steve already gave away the secret [1] (must watch) a long time ago: &amp;#39;You have to work backwards from the customer experience.&amp;#39; AI was never going to be on Apple&amp;#39;s roadmap in a significant way because it&amp;#39;s in their DNA to differentiate technology from products. [1] https://youtu.be/oeqPrUmVz-o?si=ndUU1H5D3pNifWss&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169636&quot; title=&quot;Absolutely agreed. It feels like tech companies forgot that they are supposed to add value to users. Theyve been shoving random AI usecases down their users throats with no regard for whether it works for the users flow or not. When theres so much value to be had from AI in normal products. Claude code is the best in this right now, probably because the engineers themselves are users. This isnt unprecedented, its what happened in the dotcom bubble as well. But then that tech started getting…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Many users expressed skepticism toward &amp;#34;AI agents,&amp;#34; arguing that automating the minutiae of daily life is often undesirable and ignores the practical decision-making, like price-checking, that people actually enjoy or require &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171198&quot; title=&quot;Agree with this article, and I almost threw up in my mouth when I read this quote from Stephen Levy: &amp;gt; By the end of this decade, it’s unlikely that people will swipe on their phones to tap on Uber or Lyft. They will just tell their always-on AI agent to get them home. Or that agent will have already figured out where they need to go, and the car will be waiting without the friction of a request. “There’s an app for that,” may be replaced by “Let the agent do that.” Who TF are these people who…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169582&quot; title=&quot;GPT 3.5 is nearly 4 years old. What’s a non coding use case that’s enabled with LLMs that materially improves the average person’s life? For the sake of conversation let’s say the average person is some random person in middle America. To me there are cool things but nothing so great where if LLMs were deleted I’d cry about it. To contrast mRNA vaccines, gene therapy and crispr seem more impactful in reality, just to mention things from 2020.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view these improvements as merely &amp;#34;faster horses&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48170773&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This isn’t necessary fancy, just let me set some calendar events without knowing the magic words or tell it to open Overcast and play the new Gastropod episode. Better yet, for power users, let me set up reusable shortcuts using natural language. Isn’t this the proverbial ”faster horse”? Ie let me do exactly what I can do now, in a very slightly different, possibly very slightly more convenient way?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others believe the current &amp;#34;hype cycle&amp;#34; lacks a focus on real customer value, drawing parallels to the dot-com bubble before technology was properly integrated into useful products &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169595&quot; title=&quot;Agreed. The ideal implementation of AI for Apple is probably to finally make Siri work. This isn’t necessary fancy, just let me set some calendar events without knowing the magic words or tell it to open Overcast and play the new Gastropod episode. Better yet, for power users, let me set up reusable shortcuts using natural language. The most important part of this is it doesn’t necessarily feel like AI. The user does not like AI for its own sake or the weirdos who ramble about putting them into…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169636&quot; title=&quot;Absolutely agreed. It feels like tech companies forgot that they are supposed to add value to users. Theyve been shoving random AI usecases down their users throats with no regard for whether it works for the users flow or not. When theres so much value to be had from AI in normal products. Claude code is the best in this right now, probably because the engineers themselves are users. This isnt unprecedented, its what happened in the dotcom bubble as well. But then that tech started getting…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/17/world/africa/ebola-congo-uganda-who-public-health-emergency.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;WHO declares Ebola outbreak a global health emergency&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nytimes.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168708&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;295 points · 180 comments · by zzzeek&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The World Health Organization has declared the Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda a global health emergency to coordinate an international response. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/17/world/africa/ebola-congo-uganda-who-public-health-emergency.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: nytimes.com    URL Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/17/world/africa/ebola-congo-uganda-who-public-health-emergency.html    Warning: Target URL returned error 403: Forbidden  Warning: This page maybe requiring CAPTCHA, please make sure you are authorized to access this page.    Markdown Content:&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The WHO’s declaration of a global health emergency has sparked debate over whether this Ebola strain poses a pandemic threat, with some arguing its reliance on fluid contact and high lethality naturally limits spread compared to COVID-19 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169049&quot; title=&quot;First hantavirus now this. Look, there&amp;#39;s valid reason to be concerned here but people who are fearing a repeat of the Covid-19 pandemic are seemingly missing why Covid was a pandemic. Covid spread so much for four main reasons: 1. It could spread airborne; 2. It spread relatively easily. Not quite measles-level of contagiousness but still, pretty good; 3. Unlike something like the flu, there really wasn&amp;#39;t any kind of natural resistance. What we now call the modern flu is a descendant of the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171849&quot; title=&quot;No it&amp;#39;s not a big deal. Ebola is deadly if you catch it but it is not very contagious at all. You need to be in contact with someone&amp;#39;s fluids basically. It can&amp;#39;t go very far.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others express concern that a less deadly strain could actually increase transmission by allowing carriers to remain mobile longer &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168994&quot; title=&quot;I read elsewhere that this strain is less deadly than previous strains.  I&amp;#39;m no epidemiologist but being less deadly could allow it to spread further, which is obviously concerning. Also, the article says surveillance picked up the spread late.  I wonder if the US&amp;#39;s pulling back from the WHO and other international functions had anything to do with this, it used to make up a big chunk of its resources and staff.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169154&quot; title=&quot;I was wondering about that with the hantavirus, whereby if it&amp;#39;s got a higher fatality rate then it&amp;#39;s less likely to be easily transmitted. Is that like a general rule, or pure bunk? (I&amp;#39;d probably assume the answer &amp;#39;depends&amp;#39;).&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169161&quot; title=&quot;forgot 5. Covid was exactly the right amount of deadly, 0.5-1% which made it easy to &amp;#39;roll the dice&amp;#39; on making containment harder.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant discussion centers on political factors, specifically whether reduced US funding and international involvement have weakened global surveillance and sanitation infrastructure in vulnerable regions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168994&quot; title=&quot;I read elsewhere that this strain is less deadly than previous strains.  I&amp;#39;m no epidemiologist but being less deadly could allow it to spread further, which is obviously concerning. Also, the article says surveillance picked up the spread late.  I wonder if the US&amp;#39;s pulling back from the WHO and other international functions had anything to do with this, it used to make up a big chunk of its resources and staff.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169507&quot; title=&quot;It figures: Right before the COVID-19 outbreak, Trump dismantled the White House pandemic response team and pushed to downsize the CDC—later pulling out of the WHO entirely. A new Trump term, a new pandemic?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169587&quot; title=&quot;In this case I&amp;#39;d guess the DOGE cuts to foreign aid are a massive, massive contributor to the problem. A lot of third-world countries heavily relied on USAID et al to keep basic sanitation and healthcare going.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the emergency status, the WHO currently advises against closing borders, noting the situation does not yet meet the criteria for a pandemic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169767&quot; title=&quot;This is the WHO announcement: https://www.who.int/news/item/17-05-2026-epidemic-of-ebola-d... This is our CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/ebola/situation-summary/index.html And yes, this is a big deal. Public health emergencies of international concern are a short list consisting of, in their entirety: swine flu (&amp;#39;09 to &amp;#39;10), polio (&amp;#39;14 on), ebola (&amp;#39;13 to &amp;#39;16), Zika (&amp;#39;16), ebola (&amp;#39;19 to &amp;#39;20), Covid (&amp;#39;20 to &amp;#39;23), monkeypox (&amp;#39;22 to &amp;#39;25) and now this [1]. It&amp;#39;s one step down from a pandemic emergency…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168986&quot; title=&quot;Notably (from NPR): &amp;gt;However WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus stressed in a statement it &amp;#39;does not meet the criteria of pandemic emergency&amp;#39; and advised countries against closing their borders.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/tech4bot/rk3562deb&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I turned a $80 RK3562 Android tablet into a Debian Linux workstation&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168668&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;300 points · 139 comments · by tech4bot&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The **rkdebian** project provides a build system to run a full Debian 12 Bookworm environment on the $80 Doogee U10 tablet by booting from an SD card, enabling features like Wi-Fi, NPU-accelerated local LLM inference, and 3D graphics without modifying the internal Android storage. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/tech4bot/rk3562deb&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - tech4bot/rk3562deb    URL Source: https://github.com/tech4bot/rk3562deb    Markdown Content:  ## rkdebian — Debian 12 for Doogee U10 (RK3562)    [](https://github.com/tech4bot/rk3562deb#rkdebian--debian-12-for-doogee-u10-rk3562)  ## Download Pre-release Image    [](https://github.com/tech4bot/rk3562deb#download-pre-release-image)  &amp;gt; **Current public build (pre-release, May 14, 2026):**  &amp;gt;   &amp;gt;   &amp;gt; *   Release page: [tech4bot/rk3562deb…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The project demonstrates that modern mobile hardware can be repurposed into Linux workstations by booting Debian natively from an SD card without modifying internal storage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168669&quot; title=&quot;I reverse-engineered a Doogee U10 (Rockchip RK3562) to boot Debian natively from an SD card. No BSP, no kernel source, no vendor documentation — just a DTB extracted from the stock Android firmware and rebuilt from there. The tablet boots Linux directly from SD without modifying internal Android storage. Remove the card and Android still boots normally. The process is intentionally simple: write the image to an SD card from any operating system, insert it, and boot. No flashing tools, no…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users question the usability of 4GB of RAM, others argue that lightweight desktop environments or browsers like Firefox can handle the workload effectively &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48170183&quot; title=&quot;Booting into Debian with most devices fully functional is great. What I&amp;#39;d like to know is what software runs adequately under it in 4 GB RAM. Web browsing should definitely be possible, but I suppose it&amp;#39;s limited to very few tabs. Some very lightweight DE could likely make it more usable. Running something like WezTerm + tmux as the DE could be even more economical, leaving some room for e.g. development tools.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48170904&quot; title=&quot;Browsers and anything electron-based are your enemy. Firefox is actually pretty good in low-memory situations, silently discarding tabs when under memory pressure, but the main benefit comes from being able to run proper adblocking. Chromium-based browsers just can&amp;#39;t compete these days. Otherwise, a bog standard Gnome-based Debian Trixie desktop should be pretty doable. I&amp;#39;m currently using an 8 GB machine with 3.7 GB RAM free - Firefox, evolution, gnome-calendar, and gnome-software are the only…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48170279&quot; title=&quot;Pretty much everything. I only had 4GB ram until two or three years ago. No swap. Never ran into an issue.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant portion of the discussion focuses on the author&amp;#39;s use of AI for reverse engineering; while some praise it for accelerating tedious tasks like driver debugging &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168669&quot; title=&quot;I reverse-engineered a Doogee U10 (Rockchip RK3562) to boot Debian natively from an SD card. No BSP, no kernel source, no vendor documentation — just a DTB extracted from the stock Android firmware and rebuilt from there. The tablet boots Linux directly from SD without modifying internal Android storage. Remove the card and Android still boots normally. The process is intentionally simple: write the image to an SD card from any operating system, insert it, and boot. No flashing tools, no…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169437&quot; title=&quot;I love how easy AI makes it to hack devices that otherwise wouldn&amp;#39;t be worth the time.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others criticize the &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; of AI-generated prose and worry it discourages deep learning &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169609&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; No BSP, no kernel source, no vendor documentation — just a DTB extracted from the stock Android firmware and rebuilt from there. I know you just registered to post this, but AI generated comments are not allowed here. The project looks very cool. Just take the time to write your own comments in your own words and it would certainly be welcomed.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48170171&quot; title=&quot;Ahh yes, rely on AI to avoid learning how to do something. Our brains are cooked if we keep up these attitudes.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169944&quot; title=&quot;I have mixed feelings (as in, I&amp;#39;m unsure how to feel) about projects where the code, the README and the HN/Reddit posts are mostly AI-generated. I feel the frustration of reading &amp;#39;slop&amp;#39;, but on the other hand the projects that surface do usually bring something useful to the table. Should we simply judge the submission based on its technical merit? Why do I feel annoyed that an otherwise cool project uses typical LLM prose? For how long will we be able to recognize LLM-generated text, and what…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://electrek.co/2026/05/14/tesla-solar-roof-promise-vs-reality-pivot-panels/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tesla Solar Roof is on life support as it pivot to panels&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (electrek.co)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48165980&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;215 points · 219 comments · by celsoazevedo&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tesla is pivoting away from its struggling Solar Roof product to focus on conventional solar panels after falling 97% short of its installation targets and facing persistent service issues. &lt;a href=&quot;https://electrek.co/2026/05/14/tesla-solar-roof-promise-vs-reality-pivot-panels/&quot; title=&quot;Tesla Solar Roof is on life support as it pivot to panels    Tesla promised 1,000 Solar Roofs per week by 2019. It installed roughly 3,000 total, stopped reporting numbers, and is now pivoting to conventional panels.    [Skip to main content](#main)    Toggle main menu    [Electrek Logo Go to the Electrek home page](https://electrek.co/)     Switch site    * [9to5Mac Logo9to5Mac](https://9to5mac.com/)  * [9to5Google Logo9to5Google](https://9to5google.com/)  * [9to5Toys](https://9to5toys.com/)  * [Drone DJ…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Tesla Solar Roof is widely viewed as a commercial failure due to its prohibitive $106,000 price tag and a payback period nearly double that of traditional panels &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48173499&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The economics never worked either. An average Tesla Solar Roof costs approximately $106,000 before incentives, compared to roughly $60,000 for a traditional roof replacement plus conventional solar panels — a $46,000 premium. The payback period stretches to 15-25 years, compared to 7-12 years for traditional panels. Yikes that’s a lot of money. For most people buying solar, I think payback period is probably the biggest consideration.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue the product was a genuine attempt to merge aesthetics with utility for &amp;#34;forever homes&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48166850&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m no Musk fanboy but I think this kind of maximally cynical take is tiresome. They thought it would work, they expended significant engineering effort and money making it real and producing it and selling it to customers. The simplest explanation is that they did all that and the market didn&amp;#39;t want it. The economics of traditional panels outweighed the aesthetic advantages of tiles and they&amp;#39;re pivoting. No conspiracy or fraud need be invoked.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48166655&quot; title=&quot;I think it was a genuine attempt but they failed to find a simple enough solution.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48174644&quot; title=&quot;In my opinion, the Tesla Solar Roof really appealed to people who wanted good looks. They probably already have their “forever” homes and are not thinking of moving at all. It is more about the emotional attachment to this part of your home than its functional aspects. You can buy a $100 dining table from IKEA or you can buy a $1,000 dining table from Pottery Barn or you can buy a custom $5,000 dining table made from a solid piece of wood. It&amp;#39;s the same functionality but emotionally very…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend it was &amp;#34;vaporware&amp;#34; designed primarily to inflate stock prices during periods of financial instability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48166086&quot; title=&quot;I’m pretty sure solar roof was introduced as a way to pump stock when Tesla was doing poor financially&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48166940&quot; title=&quot;Of course the market wanted it. I wanted it. My friends wanted it. But we couldn’t buy it because it was vapourware ! From this to self-driving cars in 2 years to tunnels that will change public transport… maybe Musk should prototype and see what’s actually possible before telling the market. I mean come on - it’s borderline fraud in order to pump stocks - there’s got to be stockholders that are forming class actions as we speak&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion highlights a consensus that the complexity of residential installations is inefficient compared to utility-scale solar, leading to a pivot toward more practical, panel-based solutions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168090&quot; title=&quot;Aside from power-independence, does solar on residential roofs ever make sense? For all the complexity of doing a few houses, you could do an entire parking lot (or empty land) and power the whole neighborhood.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48166850&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m no Musk fanboy but I think this kind of maximally cynical take is tiresome. They thought it would work, they expended significant engineering effort and money making it real and producing it and selling it to customers. The simplest explanation is that they did all that and the market didn&amp;#39;t want it. The economics of traditional panels outweighed the aesthetic advantages of tiles and they&amp;#39;re pivoting. No conspiracy or fraud need be invoked.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48166270&quot; title=&quot;Surely there’s a middle ground where a roof is made of something big and panel-sized, rather than a conventional roof with panels as another layer on top?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/MinishLab/semble&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Semble – Code search for agents that uses 98% fewer tokens than grep&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48169874&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;262 points · 85 comments · by Bibabomas&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Semble is an open-source, CPU-based code search tool for AI agents that uses 98% fewer tokens than grep by combining static embeddings with BM25 to provide fast, high-accuracy retrieval without requiring API keys or GPUs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/MinishLab/semble&quot; title=&quot;Hey HN! We (Stephan and Thomas) recently open-sourced Semble. We kept running into the same problem while using Claude Code on large codebases: when the agent can&amp;amp;#x27;t find something directly, it falls back to grep, reading full files or launching subagents. This uses a lot of tokens, and often still misses the relevant code. There are existing tools for this, but they were either too slow to index on demand, needed API keys, or had poor retrieval quality.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Semble is our solution for this.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Semble claims to reduce token usage by 98% compared to `grep`, users report that these savings are often negated because AI agents frequently distrust summarized results, leading to repeated retries or additional &amp;#34;read&amp;#34; commands &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48172599&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d be interested in seeing actual agent benchmarks (eg CC or Copilot CLI with grep removed and this tool instead). For example, I have explored RTK and various LSP implementations and find that the models are so heavily RL&amp;#39;d with grep that they do not trust results in other forms and will continually retry or reread, and all token savings are lost because the model does not trust the results of the other tools.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48174550&quot; title=&quot;I did some evals with pi and GPT 5.5. I tested RTK on / headroom on / both on / both off (all with the standard pi system instructions and no AGENTS.md). I forget the exact tests I used (a couple of the standard agent evals that people use, one python and one typescript because those are what I use). I don&amp;#39;t claim it was an exhaustive test, or even a good one. It&amp;#39;s possible I could have spent a day or so tuning my AGENTS.md and the pi system prompt/tool instructions and gotten better results,…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters noted that while retrieval accuracy benchmarks are provided, they fail to measure end-to-end agent performance, where specialized tools can actually increase the number of conversational turns and total cost &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48174550&quot; title=&quot;I did some evals with pi and GPT 5.5. I tested RTK on / headroom on / both on / both off (all with the standard pi system instructions and no AGENTS.md). I forget the exact tests I used (a couple of the standard agent evals that people use, one python and one typescript because those are what I use). I don&amp;#39;t claim it was an exhaustive test, or even a good one. It&amp;#39;s possible I could have spent a day or so tuning my AGENTS.md and the pi system prompt/tool instructions and gotten better results,…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171050&quot; title=&quot;Hey! Co-author here. The benchmark currently only measures retrieval accuracy. We’re interested in measuring it end to end and also optimizing, e.g. the prompt and tools, for this, but we just haven’t gotten around to it.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175406&quot; title=&quot;What I have personally observed with such tools is that they make the AI&amp;#39;s dumb, similar to how it makes coders dumb when relying more on AI tools. These agentic AI&amp;#39;s are already smart enough to figure out a highly optimized path to code exploration or search. But, with these tools, they just go very aggressive, partly because the search results from these tools almost in 100% of the cases do not furnish full details, but, just the pointers. To confirm this behaviour, I did a small test run.…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Some developers find that simpler methods, such as a well-maintained `PROJECT.md` file, outperform complex search tools by providing better context with fewer total tokens &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175406&quot; title=&quot;What I have personally observed with such tools is that they make the AI&amp;#39;s dumb, similar to how it makes coders dumb when relying more on AI tools. These agentic AI&amp;#39;s are already smart enough to figure out a highly optimized path to code exploration or search. But, with these tools, they just go very aggressive, partly because the search results from these tools almost in 100% of the cases do not furnish full details, but, just the pointers. To confirm this behaviour, I did a small test run.…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/ryangrim/status/2055992439031185782&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Meta deletes popular 1M follower account after Kuwaiti request&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48170810&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;191 points · 135 comments · by bhouston&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meta has permanently disabled the Instagram account of journalist Ahmed Shihab-Eldin, which has over one million followers, following his arrest and subsequent acquittal during a government crackdown in Kuwait. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/ryangrim/status/2055992439031185782&quot; title=&quot;Title: Ryan Grim on X: &amp;#39;Looks like @Meta plans to delete an account with more than a million followers because Ahmed was arrested and then acquitted in Kuwait amid their crackdown. Bowing down to Kuwait is pretty weak, gotta say.&amp;#39; / X    URL Source: https://twitter.com/ryangrim/status/2055992439031185782    Published Time: Mon, 18 May 2026 05:13:57 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Ryan Grim on X: &amp;#39;Looks like @Meta plans to delete an account with more than a million followers because Ahmed was arrested and…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the tension between corporate moderation and free speech, with some arguing that the U.S. should mandate transparency and appeal processes for account suspensions to counter authoritarian censorship &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171659&quot; title=&quot;In a sane world, the US as a supposed bastion of free speech and personal liberties would enact legislation that requires companies to provide a specific, articulable reason for suspending accounts due to rules violations and offer everyone the chance to appeal. That would serve as a counterbalance to more authoritarian regimes insisting companies like Meta censor people, even if the US can’t guarantee it for people not affiliated with the US. Unfortunately, the US seems more intent on…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others contend that forcing platforms to host content violates the companies&amp;#39; own free speech rights and that Meta&amp;#39;s editorial-like moderation should perhaps disqualify them from safe harbor legal protections &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171827&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; requires companies to provide a specific, articulable reason for suspending accounts wouldn&amp;#39;t that violate free speech though? forcing a company to keep something up/take something down is entirely up to them no?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171944&quot; title=&quot;You can be protected by safe harbour provisions, or you can editorialise your content. I don&amp;#39;t think you should have both. Free speech does not cover scams and fraud, something that happens on their platform. Society doesn&amp;#39;t take any action against them for publishing illegal content, scams, libel, fraud, because they aren&amp;#39;t a newspaper. They&amp;#39;re more like a newspaper printing house. In my opinion they should probably be losing those protections and should suffer legal consequences for the…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users criticize Meta for bowing to foreign government requests, others provide context that the banned account promoted the Muslim Brotherhood, a group described by commenters as a terrorist-affiliated, fascist organization &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171625&quot; title=&quot;Context: the popular account is a promoter of Muslim Brotherhood, banned by US and many Mideast countries.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48172270&quot; title=&quot;It goes quite a bit further: the Muslim Brotherhood are fascists (as in actual fascists) and (religous) racists, of the supremacist kind. They are in control of the most famous university in islamic countries: Al-Azhar. Long ago they were a supporter of Adolf Hitler, and today are known for being the parent organization of Hamas and they are supporting the genocide in Sudan (meaning they are sponsoring Arabs committing genocides on black Africans (muslim black Africans if that matters), because…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171176&quot; title=&quot;Crazy that these mega corporations still bow to the requests of countries.  Would they do the same of any important actor requesting censorship? like if Elon or Bezos make a request, they&amp;#39;d get ignored, even though they&amp;#39;re more powerful than Kuwait.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://idahonews.com/news/local/two-f-18-fighter-jets-have-crashed-during-an-airshow-at-mountain-home-air-force-base&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Two EA-18 fighter jets collide at Mountain Home airshow, pilots ejected safely&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (idahonews.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48173468&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;165 points · 143 comments · by ChrisArchitect&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Four Navy crew members ejected safely after two EA-18G Growler fighter jets collided mid-air during an aerial demonstration at the Gunfighter Skies Airshow in Idaho on Sunday. &lt;a href=&quot;https://idahonews.com/news/local/two-f-18-fighter-jets-have-crashed-during-an-airshow-at-mountain-home-air-force-base&quot; title=&quot;Title: Two EA-18 fighter jets collide at Mountain Home airshow, pilots ejected safely    URL Source: https://idahonews.com/news/local/two-f-18-fighter-jets-have-crashed-during-an-airshow-at-mountain-home-air-force-base    Published Time: 2026-05-17T13:23:36.000-06:00    Markdown Content:  # Two EA-18 fighter jets collide at Mountain Home airshow, pilots ejected safely  [Skip to main…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary debate centers on the utility of airshows, with some viewing them as vital for recruitment, pilot training, and public engagement &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48174374&quot; title=&quot;No. They are for recruitment and showing other nations what is on hand in case they want to mess with them. &amp;gt;insightful cynicism. So in response you select the most naive take?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48174096&quot; title=&quot;Crashes are rare. Exposure to the civilian for what their tax dollars are paying for, opportunities for pilots to become more skilled and train other pilots for advanced maneuvers. Things like that. Overall there’s not too much meat on the bone as far as criticisms are concerned.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, while others argue they represent an unjustifiable risk of expensive, specialized military hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48173948&quot; title=&quot;These are pretty expensive and specialized electronic warfare planes that are identical to a regular F18 in aerodynamic performance. Sucks to lose two of them for an airshow display. Isn’t that what the Blue Angels are for?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48174026&quot; title=&quot;What is the real purpose of airshows anyway? It always seems like very elevated risk for very little reward but I might just be missing what the reward is.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175034&quot; title=&quot;What are Growlers doing performing aerobatic maneuvers at air shows? They have tens of millions in specialized extra equipment on board. Seems like a poor use of taxpayer money. Send regular F-18s, not the rare expensive ones that look the same.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents counter that such events are valuable simply for their entertainment and cultural appeal &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48174296&quot; title=&quot;Too many comments are trying to overanalyze, or just show off their insightful cynicism. We do airshows because they are cool .  Lots of us love airplanes.  Humans do all kinds of activities for entertainment that are not strictly justifiable returns on investment.  I hope we never get that boring, though every year we do seem to go that direction.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the successful ejections, commenters noted the extreme physical toll of the process &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48174308&quot; title=&quot;Do we know if the pilots are OK?  Yes, ejection can save your life, but even in a best-case scenario the forces on the human body are incredibly ugly.  I know a former combat-rated RAF pilot that had to eject from a Harrier because of a low-altitude bird strike. After 6 months in the infirmary, he emerged 2cm shorter, combat rating gone forever.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48174616&quot; title=&quot;Arms and legs can take a serious beating too. Airplane cockpits are pretty tight spaces, and to be explosively shot out of one with little notice is.. yikes.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt; and expressed amazement that all four crew members survived given the low altitude and chaotic nature of the collision &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48173933&quot; title=&quot;I don’t know anything about anything but it feels kind of amazing that all four ejected with good looking parachutes given the orientation of the conglomerated plane.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48174112&quot; title=&quot;I had the same thought, but those cockpit modules are really designed to maximize the odds of safe ejection, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they consider the possibility of failure and escape as part of the stunt design.  Still, it’s amazing everything worked out, especially at that low of an altitude.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rutgerbregman.substack.com/p/10-signs-of-fascism-america-has-all&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ten Signs of Fascism. America has all of them&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (rutgerbregman.substack.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48166877&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;185 points · 85 comments · by fredski42&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Historian Rutger Bregman argues that modern American politics, specifically Trumpism, aligns with ten clinical traits of fascism, asserting that the movement has reached a critical stage of seizing power and bending state institutions to the leader&amp;#39;s will. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rutgerbregman.substack.com/p/10-signs-of-fascism-america-has-all&quot; title=&quot;Title: 10 Signs of Fascism. America has all of them.    URL Source: https://rutgerbregman.substack.com/p/10-signs-of-fascism-america-has-all    Published Time: 2026-05-17T06:02:17+00:00    Markdown Content:  Some of you may have seen this already, but for those who haven’t: after years of thinking about it, I’ve finally [started a YouTube channel](https://www.youtube.com/@rutger.bregman)!    This is something I’d wanted to do for a long time, but somehow never got around to. It always seemed too much…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on why political content is frequently flagged on Hacker News, with some users arguing that the community’s &amp;#34;self-correcting&amp;#34; aversion to politics prevents flamewars and preserves a focus on technical topics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48167482&quot; title=&quot;Nothing related to &amp;#39;politics&amp;#39; regardless of its context, content or importance, is seen to &amp;#39;gratify intellectual curiosity&amp;#39; here. Practically all &amp;#39;political&amp;#39; content is considered categorically off topic and flagged by the community unless it has some obvious technical dimension to discuss (and even then it&amp;#39;s touchy, depending on the headline.) Yes that is technically against the guidelines, no, they don&amp;#39;t care, nor will they stop. Welcome to Hacker News. Blood in the streets doesn&amp;#39;t spark…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48167536&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Welcome to Hacker News. Blood in the streets doesn&amp;#39;t spark curious conversation so let&amp;#39;s talk about compilers! Probably for the better. Otherwise it quickly becomes politics all day everyday. There are plenty of other places where you can get that already.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48167758&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The nature of the community here is a self-correcting mechanism. It looks like the community has deployed its self-correcting mechanism in this case.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics contend this culture is &amp;#34;self-sabotaging&amp;#34; and ignores the tech industry&amp;#39;s complicity in the rise of fascist characteristics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48167992&quot; title=&quot;That isn&amp;#39;t what I meant, but I know that&amp;#39;s the only way it can be interpreted. The culture here is so deeply self-sabotaging because it&amp;#39;s so deeply afraid to be human. It really gets depressing sometimes. Good day.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168404&quot; title=&quot;America does have basically every characteristic of fascism on every important list of fascism characteristics ever made. That&amp;#39;s actually kind of important to the tech community, considering we are wildly complicit in this . So, maybe consider that more than &amp;#39;politics junkies&amp;#39; might be interested in this, and that the tech billionaires might have a vested interest in making sure stories like this get flagged (very easily done).&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some participants find historical parallels to Nazi Germany alarming, others maintain that the U.S. still possesses critical safeguards like a free press and functioning courts that distinguish it from past regimes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48167041&quot; title=&quot;The parallels to the rise of Nazi Germany are striking. But it can be much worse. Read &amp;#39;February 1933&amp;#39; if you want to get a feel. Pretty much daily reports of people getting killed in clashes between Nazis and Communists. Hitler almost immediately suspends right to assemble, free speech etc, and orders police to kill dissidents on sight. Prominent  artists and journalists are getting arrested or are fleeing the country. All of that within a month of Hitler taking power. There is still hope for…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48167094&quot; title=&quot;The midterms will be a landslide if allowed to run fairly. Trump’s response to that landslide will tell us whether there’s hope. I don’t expect Civil War levels of violence because the country is mostly united in its hatred of how the GOP is running it. No large group of people will pick up arms to support Trump’s right to invade countries and ruin the economy.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://gencad.github.io/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GenCAD&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (gencad.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48173429&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;221 points · 48 comments · by dagenix&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GenCAD is a new generative model that converts 2D images into fully editable, parametric 3D CAD programs by combining contrastive representation learning with a latent diffusion model to preserve engineering accuracy and design history. &lt;a href=&quot;https://gencad.github.io/&quot; title=&quot;Title: GenCAD: Image-conditioned Computer-Aided Design Generation with Transformer-based Contrastive Representation and Diffusion Priors    URL Source: https://gencad.github.io/    Published Time: Sat, 24 May 2025 07:00:40 GMT    Markdown Content:  ## Abstract    We present GenCAD, an image-conditional CAD generation model. Our model not only generates the 3D CAD but also the entire parameterized CAD command history, CAD program, as output.    The complexity of CAD data structures such as boundary…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users report success using LLMs to generate OpenSCAD models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48174405&quot; title=&quot;This has been easy with OpenSCAD for a long time. I have made lots of cool, complex models this way. I built a repo of the prompts I use to show the llm how to do this and it includes many of the models I&amp;#39;ve created this way... https://github.com/cjtrowbridge/vibe-modeling&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48174434&quot; title=&quot;Same. Working with an LLM and OpenSCAD has been totally painless.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that OpenSCAD’s Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG) lacks crossover with the &amp;#34;true&amp;#34; B-rep modeling used in professional CAD &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48174702&quot; title=&quot;OpenSCAD has almost zero crossover with B-rep modelling (&amp;#39;true&amp;#39; CAD, what this apparently is), though.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175274&quot; title=&quot;OpenSCAD uses CSG which is generally better. Easy to convert CSG to BREP. Cant generally do the opposite&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. A primary point of confusion is which specific CAD program GenCAD targets, with some arguing the specific software is irrelevant because the model outputs a universal hierarchy of operations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48173866&quot; title=&quot;It says &amp;#39;can convert cad latents into a sequence of parametric CAD commands&amp;#39; Which CAD program? I&amp;#39;m confused Am I reading this right? &amp;gt;Most importantly, GenCAD does not merely generate a 3D solid but also the entire CAD program.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48173911&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Which CAD program? Doesn&amp;#39;t matter. CAD models/objects are represented by a sequence of operations on a primitive or sketch. Unlike meshes, that describe the manifested resulting shape of objects in 3D programs like Blender. So it&amp;#39;s about the fact, that their model outputs that hierarchy of operations. The history of development, not just the result.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48174125&quot; title=&quot;How does it not matter? Every CAD program is not going to have exactly the same interface and commands. I doubt for example this will for example generate and OpenSCAD text file.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Skeptics question the utility of AI in CAD, noting that the most difficult tasks—such as managing tolerances, constraints, and dimensions—remain unaddressed by these generative tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175355&quot; title=&quot;Neat, but I don&amp;#39;t really see the utility. The time consuming part of CAD drawing comes from figuring out the correct dimensions of each feature, spacing, sizing, tolerances, etc., and constraining the drawing in a way so that it&amp;#39;s easy to tweak later on- which this doesn&amp;#39;t do at all. Maybe you could draw a 2d sketch of what you want then generate it, but you&amp;#39;d still have to do the hard part.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48174961&quot; title=&quot;I wanted to see how well it performed on real pictures of parts or hand-drawn drawings, but when I tried setting up the docker image, immediately ran into all kinds of dependencies not being installed. The examples make me suspect it doesn&amp;#39;t work well beyond images that were generated from CAD in the first place.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.osnews.com/story/144943/eu-weighs-restricting-use-of-us-cloud-platforms-to-process-sensitive-government-data/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;EU weighs restricting use of US cloud platforms to process government data&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (osnews.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171015&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;143 points · 68 comments · by abdelhousni&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The European Union is considering new regulations to restrict member governments from using U.S. cloud providers like Google, Microsoft, and Amazon to process sensitive data due to concerns over digital sovereignty and American legal jurisdiction. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.osnews.com/story/144943/eu-weighs-restricting-use-of-us-cloud-platforms-to-process-sensitive-government-data/&quot; title=&quot;Title: EU weighs restricting use of US cloud platforms to process sensitive government data – OSnews    URL Source: https://www.osnews.com/story/144943/eu-weighs-restricting-use-of-us-cloud-platforms-to-process-sensitive-government-data/    Markdown Content:  # EU weighs restricting use of US cloud platforms to process sensitive government data – OSnews    ## [![Image 1: OSnews](https://www.osnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/logo_header.png)](https://www.osnews.com/)    *   [Popular…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide between those who believe European providers like Hetzner and OVH are production-ready alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171287&quot; title=&quot;OMG just do, EU needs some balls. Upcloud, Scaleway, Hetzner, OVH are all production ready . EU business leaders are so afraid of not using the biggest provider they are blind to how you IT can absolutely run 100% on compute from these providers and opensource&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; and critics who argue these services lack the competitive features of US giants like AWS or Azure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171712&quot; title=&quot;Why not focus on having something actually competetive with AWS / gcp / azure? And not, hetzner and OVH are not it.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest governments should return to on-premise infrastructure for better control and predictability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171686&quot; title=&quot;If you&amp;#39;re government then you can use on-prem, why TF do you need &amp;#39;cloud&amp;#39;?. It&amp;#39;s not like suddenly your user base(national population) could double overnight and you need such levels of scalability.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48172060&quot; title=&quot;Are you saying deploying Debian/BSD on some servers in the basement of a government building is too complicated and more expensive than paying Microsoft/AWS? Governments aren&amp;#39;t scale-ups/unicorns to need the scalability  and global availability of cloud, they&amp;#39;re ossified known quantity entities with predictable userbases and traffic across a very specific geographical region. On-prem is perfect for that.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that maintaining such systems requires significant specialized skills and funding &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171910&quot; title=&quot;You might ask the US gov why they use cloud if they could do it &amp;#39;on prem&amp;#39; And the answer is, only a very select gov clients have the $ and the skills to do it&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, commenters noted the irony of current EU data requirements, as many municipal governments still rely heavily on Microsoft ecosystems and US-made hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48172242&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s very funny to me that all of our municipal EU customers requires that we host in EU. But they all run Microsoft online email, Entra and so on themselves.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48172524&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;But they all run Microsoft online email, Entra and so on themselves. On their iPhones with Apple IDs.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/alternbits/awesome-cuda-books&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;CUDA Books&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168485&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;169 points · 34 comments · by dariubs&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This GitHub repository provides a curated list of major CUDA programming books ranging from beginner to advanced levels, covering topics such as C++, Python, architecture, and optimization with resources updated through 2026. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/alternbits/awesome-cuda-books&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - alternbits/awesome-cuda-books: A curated list of best cuda programming books    URL Source: https://github.com/alternbits/awesome-cuda-books    Markdown Content:  [![Image 1: Awesome](https://camo.githubusercontent.com/9d49598b873146ec650fb3f275e8a532c765dabb1f61d5afa25be41e79891aa7/68747470733a2f2f617765736f6d652e72652f62616467652e737667)](https://awesome.re/)[![Image 2: License:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion evaluates various CUDA learning resources, with some users recommending specific books for their depth while others warn that older texts may be outdated or contain errors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48172513&quot; title=&quot;Having read or at least skimmed most of those books, I think the best intro is &amp;#39;CUDA Programming: A Developer&amp;#39;s Guide to Parallel Computing with GPUs&amp;#39; Massively Parallel Processors: A Hands-on Approach is not really good in my opinion, many small mistakes and confusing sentences (even when you know cuda). CUDA by Example: An Introduction to General-Purpose GPU Programming is too simple and abstract too much the architecture. Next year I&amp;#39;m planning to start writing a cuda book that starts by…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48172844&quot; title=&quot;the first book was published in 2012,is it too outdated?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48172782&quot; title=&quot;the newest is 4th ed i think&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a debate regarding the necessity of writing custom kernels; some argue that developers should favor high-level libraries unless they require extreme micro-optimization or kernel fusion &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171471&quot; title=&quot;Increasingly (for instance ADSP podcast [1]) those in nvidia&amp;#39;s inner circle are advocating against writing your own CUDA kernels. (Unless that&amp;#39;s your full time job at nvidia, that is). [1] https://adspthepodcast.com/2024/08/30/Episode-197.html&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48172354&quot; title=&quot;It’s not about whether you work at Nvidia. Avoid writing CUDA kernels if there are higher level libraries that do what you need. Do write CUDA kernels if you want to learn how, or if you need the low level control, or to micro-optimize. Being able to fuse kernels to avoid memory traffic or get better specialization is also a reason to reach for raw CUDA. Just consider what’s the right tool for the job…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the pressure to use AI for immediate productivity, participants still value deep technical study through books, MOOCs, and specialized training series &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48170194&quot; title=&quot;In an age when your company mandates you to raise your productivity right now with hundreds of percentage points using LLMs, how do you find an excuse to sit down and read a book?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171453&quot; title=&quot;I liked going through https://www.olcf.ornl.gov/cuda-training-series/ for an intro and some fundamentals.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48172840&quot; title=&quot;Any good MOOCs on Parallel programming/NVIDIA?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://spectrum.ieee.org/payphone-voip&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;VoIP brings back old-fashioned pay phones to rural Vermont (2025)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (spectrum.ieee.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48172505&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;141 points · 41 comments · by bookofjoe&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Engineer Patrick Schlott is restoring vintage pay phones in rural Vermont, using VoIP technology to provide free, coinless calling in areas with poor cellular service. &lt;a href=&quot;https://spectrum.ieee.org/payphone-voip&quot; title=&quot;Title: Old Payphones Get Modern VoIP Upgrade    URL Source: https://spectrum.ieee.org/payphone-voip    Published Time: 2025-11-17T20:26:34Z    Markdown Content:  # Old Payphones Get Modern VoIP Upgrade - IEEE Spectrum    Opens in a new window Opens an external website Opens an external website in a new window    This website utilizes technologies such as cookies to enable essential site functionality, as well as for analytics, personalization, and targeted advertising. To learn more, view the following…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The revival of pay phones in rural Vermont mirrors a successful initiative in Australia, where free public phones serve as a vital lifeline for emergency services and individuals fleeing domestic abuse &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48173641&quot; title=&quot;One of the few good things that Telstra did in Australia was open up their whole old payphone network for free, nationwide. Apparently they&amp;#39;re a genuine lifeline for people fleeing from abusive relationships; they need to leave their mobile behind to avoid being tracked.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48173732&quot; title=&quot;I remember reading some stats on the Telstra phone boxes, they help a lot of people in need. A ton of calls go to emergency services, government services, etc. I would be keen to know the total cost to run and maintain everything. There is a ton of boxes still around.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users lament the decline of public infrastructure in the U.S. and the loss of memorized phone numbers, others express concern that proposed FCC &amp;#34;Know-Your-Customer&amp;#34; regulations could inadvertently hinder anonymous access to telecommunications &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48173324&quot; title=&quot;I wonder how this will work with the FCC&amp;#39;s proposed regulation to require ID, address, and &amp;#39;alternate phone number&amp;#39; for anyone who make make a phone call.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48173674&quot; title=&quot;I wish we had that in the US. Not due to abuse victims per se (though that does sound super useful for them), but just because it would be nice to not have to carry a cell phone to get ahold of people.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48173578&quot; title=&quot;How many phone numbers do you have memorized? These days I only know a few but I used to know dozens.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48174623&quot; title=&quot;The US is functionally a Third World country now. There are so many places worse than us that have so many better things.  Anytime you see a little thing like this that is a good idea and helps people you can just assume that America would either fuck it up or just hate it because it helps people. Or because of the fact that they can’t ring every penny from the stone.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, there is disagreement over the scope of these rules, with some arguing they are narrowly targeted at artificial voice providers to combat robocalls rather than individual callers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48173656&quot; title=&quot;I appreciated the concern, but after looking into it, that’s much more than what the FCC has proposed. The “ID, address, and alternate phone number” idea is part of a proposed Know-Your-Customer rule for artificial voice service providers when they sign up or renew customers, especially to stop illegal robocallers from getting network access. It’s not a requirement that every person provide ID before placing each phone call. The call-branding proposal is separate: it’s about displaying verified…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48174320&quot; title=&quot;I didn&amp;#39;t say every time they make a call. But everyone who is able to make a call. I don&amp;#39;t see any reason a user of a payphone is not a customer of the payphone provider for example. We&amp;#39;ll have to wait for the final guidance from the FCC, but as a telecoms provider I&amp;#39;m quite concerned about the direction.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://movq.de/blog/postings/2026-05-05/1/POSTING-en.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The occasional ECONNRESET&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (movq.de)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48170799&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;107 points · 24 comments · by zdw&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This technical investigation reveals that `ECONNRESET` errors can occur when a server closes a TCP socket while unread client data remains in the receive buffer. The author demonstrates this behavior using a C reproducer and identifies a real-world instance involving Nginx, Gunicorn, and Flask applications. &lt;a href=&quot;https://movq.de/blog/postings/2026-05-05/1/POSTING-en.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: The occasional `ECONNRESET` (part 1/2)    URL Source: https://movq.de/blog/postings/2026-05-05/1/POSTING-en.html    Markdown Content:  [blog](https://movq.de/blog/) - [git](https://movq.de/git/) - [desktop](https://movq.de/desktop/) - [contact](https://movq.de/contact.html)    * * *    2026-05-05    Two services running on the same machine. One of them opens a listening TCP socket bound to localhost, the other one connects to that. They exchange data. _Every now and then_, the service that…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on why Linux sends a TCP Reset (RST) instead of a FIN when a socket is closed while unread data remains in the receive buffer &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171875&quot; title=&quot;Part 2 shows this comment from the Linux TCP code: /* As outlined in RFC 2525, section 2.17, we send a RST here because       * data was lost. To witness the awful effects of the old behavior of       * always doing a FIN, run an older 2.1.x kernel or 2.0.x, start a bulk       * GET in an FTP client, suspend the process, wait for the client to       * advertise a zero window, then kill -9 the FTP client, wheee...       * Note: timeout is always zero in such a case.       */ Ok, so the RST is…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48172209&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; When you close a socket with data in the send buffer That&amp;#39;s not what&amp;#39;s happening here. The server is closing the socket when there&amp;#39;s data from the client that it hasn&amp;#39;t read.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. This behavior, codified in RFC 2525, prevents &amp;#34;permanently hung connections&amp;#34; where a remote sender might wait indefinitely for a zero-window state to clear or for a FIN that never arrives from a dead process &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171356&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Send off the data and close the socket. If there&amp;#39;s data still pending to be read, this will cause a RST , I think. Um, yes? That&amp;#39;s how TCP has been universally implemented for more than 30 years. See [0], 2.17 for discussion. [0] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2525#page-50&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175079&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; But what are the “awful effects” of sending FIN instead? Can someone explain? The RFC explains. The other side - the server - will be stuck on `send(sock_fd, more_bytes...)`. If it&amp;#39;s the 90s and your FTP server is single-threaded, that means the server will appear completely stuck. This won&amp;#39;t resolve for several minutes, or possibly forever if the server-side TCP stack is buggy or lacks timeouts. The client&amp;#39;s connection, even after the process is gone, will still be alive in the kernel. It…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest using `shutdown` to mitigate issues &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48172155&quot; title=&quot;That seems very outdated? Doesn&amp;#39;t `shutdown` resolve the problem here?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others note that properly closing connections is particularly tricky for HTTP/1.1 servers handling pipelined requests or unknown content lengths &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48172303&quot; title=&quot;Yep, and that makes implementing addition of &amp;#39;Connection: close&amp;#39; in an HTTP reply at the HTTP/1.1-server&amp;#39;s side somewhat tricky: you ideally need to read all of the pipelined requests from the client before closing the connection, which is usually something you&amp;#39;d rather not do. But if you just close it, you risk your client getting a partial reply, so you better add &amp;#39;Content-Length&amp;#39;/&amp;#39;Transfer-Encoding: chunked&amp;#39; in your reply as well... but one common reason to do connection-close reply is when…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The &amp;#34;awful effects&amp;#34; of the old FIN behavior included single-threaded servers becoming completely unresponsive for minutes while waiting on kernel timeouts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175079&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; But what are the “awful effects” of sending FIN instead? Can someone explain? The RFC explains. The other side - the server - will be stuck on `send(sock_fd, more_bytes...)`. If it&amp;#39;s the 90s and your FTP server is single-threaded, that means the server will appear completely stuck. This won&amp;#39;t resolve for several minutes, or possibly forever if the server-side TCP stack is buggy or lacks timeouts. The client&amp;#39;s connection, even after the process is gone, will still be alive in the kernel. It…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-16</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-16</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jvns.ca/blog/2026/05/15/moving-away-from-tailwind--and-learning-to-structure-my-css-/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Moving away from Tailwind, and learning to structure my CSS&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jvns.ca)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48158400&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;667 points · 374 comments · by mpweiher&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author describes migrating projects from Tailwind to vanilla CSS, adopting a component-based structure and modern features like CSS Grid to reduce build-system reliance and gain more creative control while retaining Tailwind&amp;#39;s systematic approach to resets, colors, and typography. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jvns.ca/blog/2026/05/15/moving-away-from-tailwind--and-learning-to-structure-my-css-/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Moving away from Tailwind, and learning to structure my CSS    URL Source: https://jvns.ca/blog/2026/05/15/moving-away-from-tailwind--and-learning-to-structure-my-css-/    Markdown Content:  Hello! 8 years ago, I [wrote excitedly about discovering Tailwind](https://jvns.ca/blog/2018/11/01/tailwind--write-css-without-the-css/).    At that time I really had no idea how to structure my CSS code and given the choice between a pile of complete chaos and Tailwind, I was really happy to choose…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Critics argue that Tailwind encourages a &amp;#34;CSS-first&amp;#34; approach that prioritizes visual styling over semantic HTML, leading to &amp;#34;div soup&amp;#34; and poor accessibility for screen-reader users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160046&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I got curious about what writing more semantic HTML would feel like. I&amp;#39;ve been teaching semantic HTML / accessible markup for a long time, and have worked extensively on sites and apps designed for screen readers. The biggest problem with Tailwind is that it inverts the order that you should be thinking about HTML and CSS. HTML is marking up the meaning of the document. You should start there. Then style with CSS. If you need extra elements for styling at that point, you might use a div or…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160349&quot; title=&quot;This isn&amp;#39;t about &amp;#39;purity/correctness&amp;#39; it&amp;#39;s about the real experience of a blind person. Accessibility means caring about the HTML. Your comment only mentions developers as the audience of HTML authoring, as opposed to users, which is a common attitude and the core problem with Tailwind.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160634&quot; title=&quot;if we get our first blind user I will gladly make some admends to make it more usable for them. Not good enough.  You have to be accessible before it is needed in order to avoid legal liability. And how do you expect to get a blind user if they already cannot use your product? None of the doctors I build web sites for are currently blind.  I know this because I talk to them regularly.  But I still build the web sites for the future, when HR might hire a doctor or nurse or other person who is…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Opponents suggest that Tailwind&amp;#39;s popularity stems from a lack of deep CSS knowledge among developers who prefer to avoid the complexities of the cascade &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160646&quot; title=&quot;One thing that has always struck me about Tailwind is that practically every argument its proponents use more or less boils down to “I never learnt CSS beyond a junior level” . It’s super common to hear Tailwind advocates say things like “Without Tailwind, we would just have one big disorganised CSS file that always grows uncontrollably and ends up with loads of obsolete stuff in it and !important everywhere! Tailwind is so much better!” . CSS is a skill just like any other technical skill. If…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160750&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s worse than that; the common arguments for Tailwind literally derive from total ignorance of how CSS is made to work, and a disposal of guidelines that developers would worship in any other context (i.e. Don&amp;#39;t Repeat Yourself). It&amp;#39;s really frustrating to be talking with someone about Tailwind and CSS, and realize that not only do they not know what &amp;#39;cascading&amp;#39; means, they never even considered the concept might be useful in the context of a stylesheet.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48161954&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; tailwind frees you from having to spend excessive time building abstractions of styles/classes that will invariably change. Abstractions like a hero image, a menu, a headline? Sure, it&amp;#39;s easy to overthink things but most of the time, it&amp;#39;s not that complex. &amp;gt; placing the styles directly into the markup that is affected by it reduces cognitive load, prevents excessively loose selectors In my opinion, it&amp;#39;s the opposite. Besides the obvious violation of DRY and the separation of concerns, inline…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, proponents maintain that Tailwind increases productivity by reducing cognitive load and that accessibility is a matter of developer care rather than a limitation of the tool itself &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160947&quot; title=&quot;you&amp;#39;re unfairly conflating things and putting the blame for a lack of care or understanding on tailwind vs on the dev themselves. nothing about tailwind forces you to build inaccessible or &amp;#39;div soup&amp;#39; apps can tailwind be used poorly? absolutely. but that&amp;#39;s true of any tool i&amp;#39;ve been writing CSS for ~20 years and am quite capable with it, having used CSS, Less, SASS/SCSS, Stylus, PostCSS etc. the reason i have settled on Tailwind for the last few years is precisely because it enables me to build…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160280&quot; title=&quot;While I agree I do think there&amp;#39;s some &amp;#39;aspiration of purity/correctness&amp;#39; in your approach that I&amp;#39;ve long let go of. I look at the royal mess that is HTML/CSS/JS as a necessary evil, required when we want to target browsers. To me it&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;just the presentation layer&amp;#39;. In my work I put a lot more emphasis on correctness in the db schema, or business logic in the backend. When it comes to the messy presentation layer I prefer to write a little as possible, while still ending up with somewhat…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160460&quot; title=&quot;I use Tailwind and have all kinds of &amp;#39;screen reader&amp;#39; directives in my templates. Not sure if it helps, but if we get our first blind user I will gladly make some admends to make it more usable for them. It seems that Tailwind is now blamed for the mess that is HTML/CSS. Tailwind certainly allows for accessible designs; it may not be the ideal solution, sure, but what we aim for is &amp;#39;good enough&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Some also argue that the framework aligns well with modern component-based workflows where the unit of reuse has shifted from CSS classes to React or Vue components &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160947&quot; title=&quot;you&amp;#39;re unfairly conflating things and putting the blame for a lack of care or understanding on tailwind vs on the dev themselves. nothing about tailwind forces you to build inaccessible or &amp;#39;div soup&amp;#39; apps can tailwind be used poorly? absolutely. but that&amp;#39;s true of any tool i&amp;#39;ve been writing CSS for ~20 years and am quite capable with it, having used CSS, Less, SASS/SCSS, Stylus, PostCSS etc. the reason i have settled on Tailwind for the last few years is precisely because it enables me to build…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48161367&quot; title=&quot;Tailwind, JS-in-CSS, and the like have become popular because they work well with the modern corporate UX workflow. A Figma component has a certain set of styles, you apply those same styles to the corresponding React component. And none of this really violates DRY, your unit of reuse has shifted from a CSS class to a framework component. There&amp;#39;s nothing precluding you from using an approach like DaisyUI if stock Tailwind has too much repetition for your taste.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://user8.bearblog.dev/the-world-is-too-complicated/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;We&amp;#39;ve made the world too complicated&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (user8.bearblog.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48158065&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;447 points · 418 comments · by James72689&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that modern society has become overwhelmingly complex and destructive, suggesting that true fulfillment may lie in rejecting technological abstraction in favor of a simpler, more primitive existence focused on basic human experiences. &lt;a href=&quot;https://user8.bearblog.dev/the-world-is-too-complicated/&quot; title=&quot;Title: We&amp;#39;ve made the world too complicated    URL Source: https://user8.bearblog.dev/the-world-is-too-complicated/    Published Time: Sun, 17 May 2026 04:51:00 GMT    Markdown Content:  _16 May, 2026_    ![Image 1: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d0/Wild_Jungle_%2842249210%29.jpeg](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d0/Wild_Jungle_%2842249210%29.jpeg)    We&amp;#39;ve made the world too complicated. I&amp;#39;m writing this with technology I will _never_ fully understand in a building with…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether modern complexity is a self-inflicted burden or a necessary evolution of human civilization. Critics argue that we have over-adapted our environment to the point of creating a &amp;#34;hazardous habitat&amp;#34; that requires constant re-adaptation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48164375&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;And here you find civilized man. Civilized man refused to adapt himself to his environment. Instead he adapted his environment to suit him. So he built cities, roads, vehicles, machinery. And he put up power lines to run his labour-saving devices. But he some how didn&amp;#39;t know when to stop.  The more he improved his surroundings to make life easier the more complicated he made it.  So now his children are sentenced to 10 to 15 years of school, just to learn how to survive in this complex and…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, often driven by a pursuit of power and wealth rather than actual human needs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48165293&quot; title=&quot;I think you are overlooking the part of the quote that says &amp;#39;but he somehow didn&amp;#39;t know when to stop&amp;#39;. Given the option of somewhere with or without modern medicine and housing, yes people choose the &amp;#39;civilized&amp;#39; version even when it is complicated, hazardous, meaningless, addictive. That doesn&amp;#39;t mean it isn&amp;#39;t appropriate to critique the parts of modern life that have more to do with people trying to have more money and power, above and beyond what&amp;#39;s required to adapt our environment to our…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, many commenters maintain that the natural world has always been &amp;#34;too complicated&amp;#34; and that modern systems simply manage that complexity to provide safety and comfort &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48158109&quot; title=&quot;Everything has always been &amp;#39;too complicated&amp;#39;, it&amp;#39;s the default state of the natural world. Just imagine the baffling profusion of problems that occur from questions like &amp;#39;is that the same plant&amp;#39;, or &amp;#39;is that berry safe to eat&amp;#39;, or &amp;#39;which kind of sickness is everyone catching and which thing is going to help?&amp;#39; The complexity never went away, we simply made ways to manage it so that it&amp;#39;s not seen as often. So now we don&amp;#39;t need divine the complex whims of the ocean god who destroyed the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48159186&quot; title=&quot;Well that&amp;#39;s how you get convenience and comfort. That&amp;#39;s how you build civilizations. Specialization started many millennium ago, when people probably didn&amp;#39;t know much, if anything, about other careers. I&amp;#39;m sure we all want to throw away working laptops, get out and enjoy nature sometimes. But no, LIVING in the nature is completely a different thing. Camping for a few days or even a month might be fine, but most people won&amp;#39;t suffer longer than that. I&amp;#39;m only worried about how we distribute…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong consensus that romanticizing a simpler past ignores the harsh realities of historical survival, such as high child mortality and the lack of medicine &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48158617&quot; title=&quot;What is this luddite rant in 2026. Let&amp;#39;s just have no medicine, no society, no police, no welfare. Let&amp;#39;s be primitive again and drink the rain. 7 billions monkeys that ignore each other and that&amp;#39;s it. Aaah, Paradise finally, no more complications. No more wars, no more oil and laptops. Let&amp;#39;s be decimated by whatever fever comes in next year, and bat ourselves in the head with branches off a tree like the good old times&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48165196&quot; title=&quot;There are many parts of the world that are less civilized: Where children do not get 10-15 years of schooling and life is reduced to more simple survival. Not many people try to move toward those civilizations. The people in those civilizations usually try hard to leave them. Underneath the elegant writing style in that quote is just another variation of nostalgia for a past that didn’t exist. We like to romanticize a version of simpler times where everything was better because it was simple.…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kabir.au/blog/the-ctf-scene-is-dead&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Frontier AI has broken the open CTF format&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (kabir.au)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48157559&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;412 points · &lt;strong&gt;438 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by frays&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of frontier AI models like GPT-5.5 and Claude 4.5 has effectively ended the traditional open Capture The Flag (CTF) format by automating complex reasoning and problem-solving, turning competitive security into a pay-to-win orchestration benchmark rather than a measure of human skill. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kabir.au/blog/the-ctf-scene-is-dead&quot; title=&quot;Title: The CTF scene is dead    URL Source: https://kabir.au/blog/the-ctf-scene-is-dead    Markdown Content:  ## What makes me qualified to say this?    I started playing CTFs in 2021, the same year I started university. My first CTF was HCKSYD, a 48-hour solo CTF. I full solved it and won in 2 hours. I was completely hooked. That led me to win DownUnderCTF, Australia&amp;#39;s largest CTF, with Blitzkrieg multiple times. Blitzkrieg was one of Australia&amp;#39;s strongest teams at the time. I later joined…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of frontier AI has triggered a &amp;#34;slow motion collapse&amp;#34; in education and competitive formats like Capture The Flag (CTF), as the temptation to automate tasks undermines the learning process &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48158172&quot; title=&quot;Replace ‘CTF’ with ‘high school’ or ‘university’ and you’ve described the total slow motion collapse of education; the only saving grace is that most of it requires in person presence. We’ve figured out the human replacement pipeline it seems, but we haven’t figured out the eduction part. LLMs can be wonderful teachers, but the temptation to just tell it ‘do it for me’ is almost impossible to resist.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48158235&quot; title=&quot;Meta: this was submitted with the article’s title “The CTF scene is dead” which I found very easy to understand. It has just been updated to use the subtitle’s first sentence, “Frontier AI has broken the open CTF format”. I find that much harder to grasp, rather like a garden-path sentence. My immediate thoughts were that “Frontier” was a company name, and that there was some file format named CTF. If you don’t know about Capture The Flag contests, the change doesn’t help. If you do, I think…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that AI&amp;#39;s ability to ship code to specification makes traditional skills like &amp;#34;fizzbuzz&amp;#34; obsolete, others contend that reliance on AI creates a massive competency gap and necessitates a return to &amp;#34;pen and paper&amp;#34; education to foster first-principles thinking &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48158480&quot; title=&quot;We are interviewing for a software dev role and we made the first round in person to prevent cheating. The gap between people who learned pre ai vs post is immense. I had a dev with supposedly 3 years experience and a degree in software who wouldn&amp;#39;t have been able to write fizzbuzz without AI.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48159547&quot; title=&quot;Why is it important that a dev can’t do fizzbuzz without ai? If they can ship code that matches a spec, why does it matter if they’re using ai or not? Genuinely curious.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160446&quot; title=&quot;Everything we&amp;#39;ve learned in the last 10 years is telling us that computers do not help human education in the slightest. We remember better when we write with pen and paper. We learn better with whiteboards and paper books. The simple answer: Remove most computing from education entirely. Blue composition books, pencils, whiteboards is what trains humans. Calculators are helpful perhaps but it is quite possible that slide rules are better. We need humans that can critically think from first…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Though LLMs are criticized for confident hallucinations, some users note that human teachers are often just as unreliable, suggesting that the primary challenge lies in preventing cheating through in-person or offline testing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48158210&quot; title=&quot;Wonderful teachers that give unreliable information with total confidence?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48158344&quot; title=&quot;I had human teachers who did that in middle/high school. Took me many years to pick out all the hallucinated bits of &amp;#39;knowledge&amp;#39;. I don&amp;#39;t think the current models are any less reliable that what we currently have on average.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48157891&quot; title=&quot;You could make it offline and with provided laptops only, just like with the competitive CS2 scene.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://crates.io/crates/zerostack/1.0.0&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Zerostack – A Unix-inspired coding agent written in pure Rust&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (crates.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48164287&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;546 points · 299 comments · by gidellav&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Zerostack is a lightweight, Unix-inspired coding agent written in Rust that features a multi-provider permission system, bash execution with sandboxing, and experimental git worktree integration. It is designed for high performance with a minimal 8.9MB binary and low RAM footprint compared to JavaScript-based alternatives. &lt;a href=&quot;https://crates.io/crates/zerostack/1.0.0&quot; title=&quot;Title: crates.io: Rust Package Registry    URL Source: https://crates.io/crates/zerostack/1.0.0    Markdown Content:  ## [](https://crates.io/crates/zerostack/1.0.0#zerostack)zerostack    Minimal coding agent written in Rust, inspired by [pi](https://pi.dev/docs/latest/usage) and [opencode](https://opencode.ai/).    ## [](https://crates.io/crates/zerostack/1.0.0#features)Features    *   **Multi-provider**: OpenRouter, OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Ollama, plus custom providers  *   **File tools**: read,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Zerostack is praised for its minimal RAM footprint of 8–12MB, a stark contrast to the gigabytes required by alternatives like Claude Code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48164613&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;RAM footprint: ~8MB on an empty session, ~12MB when working&amp;#39; I like this, Claude Code is using multiple gigabytes, which is really annoying on lowend laptops&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users questioned if context window size impacts this memory usage, others noted that even large contexts should only account for a few megabytes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48164659&quot; title=&quot;Isn&amp;#39;t that because of the context window size?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48164690&quot; title=&quot;The context window has nothing to do with RAM usage and even if it did, a million tokens of context is maybe 5mb.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Developers discussed the trade-offs of using a compiled language like Rust versus interpreted ones, specifically regarding the ability for agents to self-mutate or generate new tools on the fly &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48164909&quot; title=&quot;Thanks, I&amp;#39;ve been tooling away in my spare time on my own version of this -- both to get a deeper understanding of agents (everyone suggests writing your own) and to help learn Rust.  I&amp;#39;d like to retain `pi`&amp;#39;s configurability though, the ability to self-mutate and generate new tools is incredibly useful, particularly because I don&amp;#39;t think any of these things should have access to arbitrary code execution through `bash` (of course, if they have access to, say, `edit` and `cargo run` they still…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48164948&quot; title=&quot;I actually though about this issue, but while Pi can have this script-like environment thanks to the fact that it&amp;#39;s based on an interpreted language (TypeScript), Rust has its own limitation as a compiled language. I decided to allow for customization in a different way: 1. The prompt library (~/.config/hypernova/prompts/) acts as a simpler alternative to Skills, with the built-in prompts that should replace superpowers + Claude&amp;#39;s frontend-design 2. Compile-time features; things that might make…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48164972&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been trying to use `Deno` underneath `Rust` so that the tools can still be written in Typescript and thus self-mutated without the compilation step (but I can still try to do clever things with V8 Isolates or similar).  It&amp;#39;s been an ugly experiment so far; I&amp;#39;m vaguely thinking a simpler model would be to just define a binary &amp;#39;API&amp;#39; and run tools by exec-ing binaries.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. To address security and flexibility, the creator implemented a four-mode permission system ranging from &amp;#34;Restrictive&amp;#34; to &amp;#34;YOLO&amp;#34; to manage arbitrary code execution &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48164948&quot; title=&quot;I actually though about this issue, but while Pi can have this script-like environment thanks to the fact that it&amp;#39;s based on an interpreted language (TypeScript), Rust has its own limitation as a compiled language. I decided to allow for customization in a different way: 1. The prompt library (~/.config/hypernova/prompts/) acts as a simpler alternative to Skills, with the built-in prompts that should replace superpowers + Claude&amp;#39;s frontend-design 2. Compile-time features; things that might make…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kevinpatel.xyz/posts/no-way-to-prevent-this/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;#39;No way to prevent this,&amp;#39; says only package manager where this regularly happens&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (kevinpatel.xyz)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48155690&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;445 points · 215 comments · by alligatorplum&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Satirizing the JavaScript ecosystem, this piece highlights how npm&amp;#39;s heavy reliance on unvetted third-party packages leads to frequent supply chain attacks that other programming languages avoid through robust standard libraries and stricter security protocols. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kevinpatel.xyz/posts/no-way-to-prevent-this/&quot; title=&quot;Title: ‘No Way To Prevent This,’ Says Only Package Manager Where This Regularly Happens    URL Source: https://kevinpatel.xyz/posts/no-way-to-prevent-this/    Published Time: 2026-05-15    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: Devastating](https://kevinpatel.xyz/posts/no-way-to-prevent-this/image.png)    SAN FRANCISCO, CA - In the wake of a devastating supply chain attack in the npm registry that left millions of enterprise applications compromised and billions of user records exposed, developers across the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The high frequency of supply chain attacks in the npm ecosystem is attributed to a minimal standard library that forces developers to rely on massive, deeply nested dependency trees &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48156244&quot; title=&quot;Part of the point the article makes is that most other popular languages have a comprehensive standard library. JS has an astonishingly small on. Rather than have one vetted set of libraries that ship with the language, applications either need to roll it themselves or pull from a 3rd party package repository. We&amp;#39;ve drilled NIH into people, so they tend to reach for packages. That&amp;#39;s not necessarily a bad thing, but it often means they&amp;#39;re pulling in more code than they need. The JS ecosystem has…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that newer ecosystems like Rust face similar structural risks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48156143&quot; title=&quot;To be honest Rust has the exact same supply chain attack pattern - it&amp;#39;s just newer and more maintained at the moment. Give it a decade.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others point to Maven Central’s success in using namespaces and immutable releases as a model npm should replicate &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48156191&quot; title=&quot;It is 100% up to the package manager&amp;#39;s steward to control how ownership of packages and namespaces are granted. Maven Central exists for decades the amount of incidents of people stealing namespaces is minimal. One can&amp;#39;t simply publish a package under the groupId &amp;#39;com.ycombinator&amp;#39; without having some way to verify that they own the domain ycombinator.com. Then, once a package is published, it is 100% immutable, even if it has malicious code in it. Certainly, that library is flagged everywhere…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48156532&quot; title=&quot;That is another important layer. Maven Central is not immune to credential theft. If a publisher token is stolen, an attacker may still be able to publish a malicious new version until the token is revoked or the account is suspended after reporting the problem to Sonatype. But in the Maven/Gradle ecosystem, most projects pin exact dependency versions. Support for version ranges and dynamic versions exist, but they are generally avoided because they hurt reproducible builds. That means a…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Proposed defenses include implementing &amp;#34;cooldown periods&amp;#34; to delay new releases until they are vetted &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48156360&quot; title=&quot;I know people have opinions about cooldowns, but they would have saved you from axios, tanstack, and many other recent npm supply chain attacks. If you have Artifactory / Nexus, you probably already have cooldowns, but it&amp;#39;s easy to set up if you don&amp;#39;t. Why cooldowns? Most npm (or pypi) compromises were taken down within hours, cooldowns simply mean - ignore any package with release date younger than N days (1 day can work, 3 days is ok, 7 days is a bit of an overkill but works too) How to set…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, though critics argue this merely delays infections if no one is actively auditing the code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48157399&quot; title=&quot;Doesn’t that just move the problem 7 days down the road? I always assumed these kinds of things just burn themselves because someone gets infected and realizes, not that there is an army of people auditing the changes. If everyone cooldowns for 7 days, it just happens later?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant debate over &amp;#34;postinstall&amp;#34; scripts; some view them as an unnecessary security hole that should be abolished &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48156153&quot; title=&quot;There is no legitimate reason why postinstall scripts need to exist. The npm team needs to grow up and declare &amp;#39;starting with npm version whatever, npm will only run postinstall scripts for versions of packages published before ${today}&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48156532&quot; title=&quot;That is another important layer. Maven Central is not immune to credential theft. If a publisher token is stolen, an attacker may still be able to publish a malicious new version until the token is revoked or the account is suspended after reporting the problem to Sonatype. But in the Maven/Gradle ecosystem, most projects pin exact dependency versions. Support for version ranges and dynamic versions exist, but they are generally avoided because they hurt reproducible builds. That means a…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, while others argue that since the installed code will eventually be executed anyway, removing scripts is a distraction from the core issue &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48156207&quot; title=&quot;install scripts are a distraction, just like package signatures are a distraction. adding/removing either feature has no significant impact on the wormability of this package ecosystem. installed npm code is run, with nearly zero exceptions.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openai.com/index/malta-chatgpt-plus-partnership/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OpenAI and Government of Malta partner to roll out ChatGPT Plus to all citizens&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (openai.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48163392&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;317 points · 326 comments · by bookofjoe&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI and the Government of Malta have launched a first-of-its-kind partnership to provide all Maltese citizens with free access to ChatGPT Plus for one year upon completion of a national AI literacy course. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openai.com/index/malta-chatgpt-plus-partnership/&quot; title=&quot;Title: OpenAI and Malta partner to bring ChatGPT Plus to all citizens    URL Source: https://openai.com/index/malta-chatgpt-plus-partnership/    Markdown Content:  OpenAI and Malta partner to bring ChatGPT Plus to all citizens | OpenAI    OpenAI and the Government of Malta are today announcing a world’s first partnership to roll out ChatGPT Plus to all Maltese citizens. The initiative will provide access to intelligence and empower citizens through an AI literacy course to build practical AI skills…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The partnership between OpenAI and Malta has sparked debate over the &amp;#34;intelligence as a utility&amp;#34; branding, with some critics calling it condescending and others arguing that the models provide a level of specialized knowledge inaccessible to the average person &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48163607&quot; title=&quot;I’m personally not a fan of OpenAI always referring to their model as “providing intelligence as a utility.” Sounds very condescending, are you saying this isn’t something we already have? If that’s the opinion, may be good to reflect on how the models were trained. On millions upon millions of books which no authors were compensated for. But that’s besides the point, the whole initiative is self-defeating by design. This isn’t like power, it’s something humans do inherently possess, this is…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48163802&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;I’m personally not a fan of OpenAI always referring to their model as “providing intelligence as a utility.” Sounds very condescending, are you saying this isn’t something we already have? We do and we don&amp;#39;t. If you would go out there and talk to a random person about elliptic curves and matrix multiplications and whether you hit a performance ceiling in a specific 2x2 multiplication thingy with Karatsuba and wnaf, they would not know half the words, but the lying and flattering machine will…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Commentators expressed significant concerns regarding national security, data privacy, and GDPR compliance, questioning how a foreign company will handle the personal data of an entire EU citizenry &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48163570&quot; title=&quot;Can&amp;#39;t imagine the size of brown envelope. Handing over your entire nation&amp;#39;s thoughts to a foreign company operating under US Cloud Act in normal circumstances would be considered a risk to national security. Why not invest in home grown talent and companies?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48165689&quot; title=&quot;All that data on all Malta citizens.  Remember, if you&amp;#39;re more paying, you&amp;#39;re the product&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48163754&quot; title=&quot;Malta is part of the EU. I am personally very surprised about this partnership, just in the context of data security, privacy and the GDPR. How is the privacy of these EU citizens protected when all their prompts and data is sent to OpenAI? How do these EU citizens submit a request for all their personal data to be deleted from OpenAI records, a right they have under the GDPR with a compliant data processor?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view the initiative as a positive step toward AI literacy, others suggest the deal may be influenced by Malta&amp;#39;s history of government corruption or is unnecessary given the already low cost of AI services &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48163523&quot; title=&quot;Would be interesting long term if this sways public opinion about data centers in Malta. I do support though AI literacy in general and this is a good step. Would wonder about the deal in how much this is actually costing Malta if at all.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48163553&quot; title=&quot;The subsidies deployed by the industry are so massive I don&amp;#39;t even know if consumers need public assistance here. It&amp;#39;s kinda like the gov was subsidizing web hosting or basic banking. The price for a regular consumer already barely hovers above zero. Just look at this list of services included in Google&amp;#39;s AI Pro subscription[1]. Google took everything it could think any consumer might need and bundled for $20/mo. There&amp;#39;s even $10 GCP credit (that you can use for AI API calls). [1]…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48165982&quot; title=&quot;Malta is an important component of Russia&amp;#39;s money laundering Laundromat system. &amp;#39;Malta’s corruption is not just in the heart of government, it’s the entire body&amp;#39; https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/dec/03/malta-...&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48163501&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; &amp;#39;Malta’s AI for All initiative will offer people of all backgrounds the opportunity to learn how AI can be used responsibly through a course developed by the University of Malta. The course is designed to help people understand what AI is, what it can and can’t do, and how to use it responsibly at home and work. After the course is completed, citizens can access ChatGPT Plus for one year at no cost to them.&amp;#39;*&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theregister.com/on-prem/2026/05/01/where-to-buy-a-non-apple-non-google-smartphone/5219681&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Where to buy a non-Apple, non-Google smartphone&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theregister.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48158130&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;274 points · &lt;strong&gt;292 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by _____k&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As Google and Apple implement more restrictive OS updates, several companies like Murena, Punkt, Volla, and Jolla offer alternative smartphones running de-Googled Android variants or independent Linux-based operating systems to help users maintain control over their devices and privacy. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theregister.com/on-prem/2026/05/01/where-to-buy-a-non-apple-non-google-smartphone/5219681&quot; title=&quot;Title: Where to buy a non-Apple, non-Google smartphone    URL Source: https://www.theregister.com/on-prem/2026/05/01/where-to-buy-a-non-apple-non-google-smartphone/5219681    Published Time: 2026-05-01T15:24:14.000Z    Markdown Content:  As both Apple and Google introduce unwelcome changes in their phone OSes, here&amp;#39;s a quick reminder that you _do_ have alternatives to the Gruesome Twosome.    The [Keep Android Open](https://keepandroidopen.org/en/) campaign is gathering attention and support as the big…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users argue that living without a mainstream smartphone is possible by reverting to 1990s-style habits or using Linux-based alternatives like the Librem5 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48161031&quot; title=&quot;You can exist, but life will be as inconvenient as it was in the 1990s (though importantly, it didn&amp;#39;t seem inconvenient at the time, it was just the way things were).&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48159071&quot; title=&quot;I use a Librem5 Linux phone. With the default PureOS operating system. Enjoy your freedom, break free from Google and Apple. Have a full Linux computer in your pocket that you can also use for calling. See also the discussion on this post: https://mastodon.social/@janvlug/116504044251287290&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48163254&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Nowadays, you can no longer exist in society without a phone Hyperbole doesn’t help. I’m a 44 year old former software engineer now with a modest social media following (100k per platform). I don’t have a phone. I’ve never had a smart phone, last dumb phone gone in 2015. I have to hassle my bank to let me use email instead of SMS for 2FA, and I hand jot notes for driving directions sometimes. Otherwise, I’m immensely happy not to have one.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, a strong consensus suggests that modern society has made Apple or Google devices mandatory for essential services &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160742&quot; title=&quot;The challenge isn&amp;#39;t buying it, the challenge is being able to do phone things with it. Nowadays, you can no longer exist in society without a phone. Most things will work but it takes one critical service that doesn&amp;#39;t have a viable workaround, and you&amp;#39;re forced to buy (and possibly carry) a &amp;#39;mainstream&amp;#39; phone just for that. Banking, government, authentication, postal service and public transit apps are just some of the common categories that will, in the end, force you to use one of those…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48159618&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Enjoy your freedom, break free from Google and Apple. You can&amp;#39;t escape it. Your friends and employers and banks use it. The state will soon mandate it for ID. It&amp;#39;s the accepted worldwide compute platform, and you&amp;#39;re being the nail that sticks out. Your usage is subject to breaking randomly, being unsupported, losing access or being banned by stepping outside the traffic lines, etc. They&amp;#39;ll use attestation, certs and signing, proprietary APIs, and the scale and might of trillions of dollars to…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters highlight that banking, healthcare, employment access, and even youth sports now frequently require proprietary apps with no analog or desktop workarounds &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48161156&quot; title=&quot;I disagree. You cannot even book appointments in a lot of banks today, a thing you could do in the 90s. Like that, a lot of services are unavailable without a smartphone and its non-smartphone equivalent is not available anymore.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48161512&quot; title=&quot;This. 1. My bank doesn&amp;#39;t allow to go in person without an in-app taken appointment. 2. My nephew can&amp;#39;t play football in his team, because the team has an app to book/signal your availability. No other way. 3. Half of restaurants in my area do not have non-QR code menus, they just don&amp;#39;t. 4. McDonald&amp;#39;s will make me pay the scam pricing you get without the app. 5. My doctor gives documentation only and exclusively in digital form, on a special application that doesn&amp;#39;t even have a desktop…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While privacy-focused OS options like GrapheneOS exist, many believe true freedom from this &amp;#34;monopolistic tyranny&amp;#34; can only be achieved through government regulation and trust-busting rather than individual hardware choices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48159618&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Enjoy your freedom, break free from Google and Apple. You can&amp;#39;t escape it. Your friends and employers and banks use it. The state will soon mandate it for ID. It&amp;#39;s the accepted worldwide compute platform, and you&amp;#39;re being the nail that sticks out. Your usage is subject to breaking randomly, being unsupported, losing access or being banned by stepping outside the traffic lines, etc. They&amp;#39;ll use attestation, certs and signing, proprietary APIs, and the scale and might of trillions of dollars to…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48159100&quot; title=&quot;This article fails to mention GrapheneOS. The article starts with Murena, Punkt, Volla which are all based on Android. If you do this, then imho you must mention GrapheneOS, the by far better option (updates, privacy, security, organisation). Google Pixel with GrapheneOS is the best non-Google phone... ;-)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://refractor.io/adhd-autism/fecal-transplants-for-autism-delivers-success-in-clinical-trials/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Fecal transplants for autism deliver success in clinical trials (2019)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (refractor.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48158494&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;321 points · 225 comments · by breve&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Arizona State University researchers found that fecal transplants significantly reduced autism symptoms and gastrointestinal issues in clinical trials, with benefits persisting and even improving two years after treatment; the therapy is now moving into Phase 3 human trials for potential FDA approval. &lt;a href=&quot;https://refractor.io/adhd-autism/fecal-transplants-for-autism-delivers-success-in-clinical-trials/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Fecal transplants for autism deliver success in clinical trials    URL Source: https://refractor.io/adhd-autism/fecal-transplants-for-autism-delivers-success-in-clinical-trials/    Published Time: 2025-04-21T10:03:00Z    Markdown Content:  # Fecal transplants show success in autism clinical trials, study finds    *   [SIGN UP](https://refractor.io/subscribe-to-refractor-plus/)    *   [LOG…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether the gut microbiome is a cause or a consequence of autism, with some suggesting that the extremely limited diets common in autistic children—including a case of scurvy from eating only Wheat Thins—may be what degrades gut health &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160126&quot; title=&quot;Many autistic children have extremely limited diets. For example, a geneticist friend of mine saw a case where an autistic child had been referred for genetic testing because of horrific, chronic, spontaneous wounds on gums and skin. Turned out to be scurvy, because he had exclusively eaten Wheat Thins for the last 3-4 years, which aren’t fortified with vitamin C. I would fully expect that a monotonous diet leads to a heavy skew in the gut microbiome as specific bacterial species that thrive on…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160519&quot; title=&quot;The microbiome might have some modulating effect, but the fidelity of gut-brain axis communication isn’t so strong that our gut microbiome is driving us around with highly specific inputs. The theories for how gut-brain axis modulation works include altering the balance of nutrients that get absorbed and modulating the vagus nerve, primarily. For someone with autism it might be possible that altering some of these balances could make the condition better or worse, but that’s all theory without…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that gut makeup could actually drive these dietary preferences &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160330&quot; title=&quot;Just to play devil’s advocate, isn’t it also possible that the preference for a monotonous diet is driven by gut makeup?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others remain skeptical of the trial results, questioning if the children were simply miscategorized or naturally matured out of their symptoms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48159583&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s more plausible? Did they cure low functioning autism in two years? Or did they simpily miscategorize the kids and the kids grew out of their diagnosis as they matured?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, commenters debated the ethics of researchers patenting bacterial formulations for profit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48159996&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; In early 2022 Krajmalnik-Brown and colleagues patented a specific bacterial formulation and spun-off a commercial company called Gut-Brain Axis Therapeutics. I was a little surprised to see this. So the university researchers use time and money from the university to make a discovery, extending on previous published research, and then patent it and start their own for-profit? Excuse my ignorance, but is that how it&amp;#39;s done generally? Where&amp;#39;s the upside for all those who are potentially…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt; and shared personal anecdotes about using fermented foods to repair the microbiome as a less invasive alternative to transplants &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48159706&quot; title=&quot;I got bad chronic constipation after four years as a strict carnivore. I didn&amp;#39;t get relief just by adding back fiber, but I did by adding fermented foods like kimchi. I wonder if ferments are a more natural way than fecal transplants to repair the gut microbiome, possibly treating autism. Studies have been non conclusive, but this story makes me think it&amp;#39;s worth pursuing.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nvlabs.github.io/Sana/WM/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SANA-WM, a 2.6B open-source world model for 1-minute 720p video&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nvlabs.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48159445&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;392 points · 146 comments · by mjgil&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NVIDIA researchers have introduced SANA-WM, an open-source 2.6B-parameter world model capable of generating high-fidelity, one-minute 720p videos from a single image and camera trajectory on a single GPU. The model utilizes hybrid linear attention and a two-stage refinement pipeline to maintain long-term temporal consistency and precise camera control. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nvlabs.github.io/Sana/WM/&quot; title=&quot;Title: WM | Efficient Minute-Scale World Modeling    URL Source: https://nvlabs.github.io/Sana/WM/    Published Time: Sat, 16 May 2026 19:08:08 GMT    Markdown Content:  # SANA-WM | Efficient Minute-Scale World Modeling    [Video 67](https://nvlabs.github.io/Sana/WM/media/videos/hero_reel_v9.mp4)[SANA-WM](https://nvlabs.github.io/Sana/WM/#top)    [Abstract](https://nvlabs.github.io/Sana/WM/#abstract)[Demos](https://nvlabs.github.io/Sana/WM/#demos)[Citation](https://nvlabs.github.io/Sana/WM/#citation)    #…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether &amp;#34;world models&amp;#34; can ever replicate the deep intentionality and consistency found in handcrafted video games, with some arguing that AI-generated content feels impersonal or &amp;#34;dead&amp;#34; compared to human-designed experiences &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160388&quot; title=&quot;I struggle with these world models from the perspective of video games (so this post is a particular perspective). I&amp;#39;m not a game developer myself, but some of my favorite games carry a deep sense of intentionality. For instance, there is typically not a single item misplaced in a FromSoftware game (or, for instance, Lies of P -- more recently). Almost every object is placed intentionally. Games which lack this intentionality often feel dead in contrast. You run into experiences which break…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160713&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, but is this really that great? Are these models going to remember the town you wandered through on your session yesterday and want to return to? Imagine playing Read Dead Redemption 2 and you attempt to ride your horse from Saint Denis to Valentine and Valentine no longer exists, or is a completely different town located half a mile off from where it was originally. I just don&amp;#39;t see how this would work...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While critics worry these models act more like &amp;#34;microwaves&amp;#34; than precision tools, others suggest they will accelerate the creation of &amp;#34;great&amp;#34; games by increasing the sheer volume of content or enabling rapid procedural generation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160486&quot; title=&quot;By and large I agree, but it doesn’t need to be either/or. Many of the most popular games in the past decade are procedurally generated and have nothing “intentionally” placed (apart from tuning/tweaking the balance of the seeding algorithms).&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162475&quot; title=&quot;I suspect these models will be like old Gutenberg&amp;#39;s printing press. A rapid rise in the amount of content; most of it not that great. However the sheer volume will result in even more high quality content actually being created in aggregate. Put another way, the average game quality will go down, but the actual rate of &amp;#39;Great&amp;#39; games will go up.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160507&quot; title=&quot;Games. Build campaigns in hours instead of months. Make it possible for users to create their own campaigns, move the action to different game worlds - &amp;#39;gimme Mario Kart in the ${favourite_game} world&amp;#39;, etc.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48163225&quot; title=&quot;Have to disagree here as I don&amp;#39;t subscribe to your analogy. GenAI can be considered a tool, yes, but it&amp;#39;s less a &amp;#39;circular saw for workshops&amp;#39;-tool, and more a &amp;#39;microwave for kitchens&amp;#39;-tool... and I doubt microwaves led to higher quality content in aggregate.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical concerns were also raised regarding the high bandwidth requirements of the demo and visible consistency errors in the video output, such as shifting geometry &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48161573&quot; title=&quot;warning: viewing the videos that auto play on that page shot up my downloads to 350Mbps on that page&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48159997&quot; title=&quot;First video with the guy walking the mountain in snow has consistency issues with the cave entrance. Which is &amp;#39;expected&amp;#39; at this model size?!&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/fiction/accelerando/accelerando.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Accelerando (2005)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (antipope.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48159241&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;325 points · 196 comments · by eamag&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the first chapter of Charles Stross’s novel *Accelerando*, &amp;#34;venture altruist&amp;#34; Manfred Macx navigates a high-tech Amsterdam while being pursued by his IRS-agent ex-fiancée and a group of uploaded lobster intelligences seeking his help to defect from their corporate processors and escape the impending technological singularity. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/fiction/accelerando/accelerando.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Accelerando    URL Source: https://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/fiction/accelerando/accelerando.html    Published Time: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 15:16:15 GMT    Markdown Content:  A novel by Charles Stross    Copyright © Charles Stross, 2005    Published by    Ace Books, New York, July 2005, ISBN 0441012841    Orbit Books, London, August 2005, ISBN 1841493902    ### License    [![Image 1: Creative Commons…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters highlight Charles Stross’s *Accelerando* (2005) for its prescient depiction of AI agents, &amp;#34;skills atrophy&amp;#34; from tech dependency, and the rise of autonomous corporate entities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160113&quot; title=&quot;Accelerando has prophecies that are coming true and it&amp;#39;s scary. Spoiler warning in case you want to read it. The first part&amp;#39;s main character basically has the future version of openclaw running in his glasses that let him dispatch agents to do any tasks/research he wants or to autonomously do things for him. -&amp;gt; we are already kinda here He&amp;#39;s got such total dependency on his agents that when he loses his glasses he&amp;#39;s basically no longer functional, unable to do anything for himself, doesn&amp;#39;t know…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160140&quot; title=&quot;This was written in 2005(!) -&amp;gt; &amp;gt; Manfred drains his beer glass, sets it down, stands up, and begins to walk along the main road, phone glued to the side of his head. He wraps his throat mike around the cheap black plastic casing, pipes the input to a simple listener process. &amp;#39;Are you saying you taught yourself the language just so you could talk to me?&amp;#39; &amp;gt; &amp;#39;Da, was easy: Spawn billion-node neural network, and download Teletubbies and Sesame Street at maximum speed. Pardon excuse entropy overlay…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate how close we truly are to automated AI courts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160113&quot; title=&quot;Accelerando has prophecies that are coming true and it&amp;#39;s scary. Spoiler warning in case you want to read it. The first part&amp;#39;s main character basically has the future version of openclaw running in his glasses that let him dispatch agents to do any tasks/research he wants or to autonomously do things for him. -&amp;gt; we are already kinda here He&amp;#39;s got such total dependency on his agents that when he loses his glasses he&amp;#39;s basically no longer functional, unable to do anything for himself, doesn&amp;#39;t know…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162037&quot; title=&quot;“ verdicts are delivered by AI courts, all within milliseconds” In which way is this on-track to happen?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others point to the &amp;#34;OpenClaw&amp;#34; project as a likely nod to the book&amp;#39;s uploaded lobster minds &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160901&quot; title=&quot;Even more fitting is the part of the story where a collective of uploaded lobster minds are involved. I wonder if that was an inspiration for the &amp;#39;OpenClaw&amp;#39; name somehow or just pure coincidence.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48161397&quot; title=&quot;The fact that the OpenClaw creators seemingly missed that parallel tells you everything you need to know about the project.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160481&quot; title=&quot;This was a genetically modified space lobster talking to Mangred, right? I haven&amp;#39;t verified but I&amp;#39;ve been assuming that the lobster mascot for OpenClaw was a reference to Accelerando.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also identifies the book’s &amp;#34;always-on&amp;#34; surveillance culture and now-archaic terminology as a reflection of how rapidly the real-world tech landscape has shifted since its publication &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48159863&quot; title=&quot;Do I remember correctly that one of the major characters in what we would now call an influencer with always-on video glasses? I think his spectacles get slashdotted at one point. I’m not sure which is the greater anachronism got me. That I didn’t find the idea of endless surveillance creep glasses bothersome at the time I read the book or that slashdotting is in itself a once current, now newly archaic term.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.frankmtaylor.com/2026/05/13/you-dont-know-html-lists/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;HTML Lists&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.frankmtaylor.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48161861&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;347 points · 87 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This guide explores the five types of HTML lists—ordered, unordered, description, menu, and control—detailing their specific semantic purposes, such as using `&amp;amp;lt;menu&amp;amp;gt;` for toolbars and `&amp;amp;lt;dl&amp;amp;gt;` for metadata, while emphasizing that choice should be driven by content meaning rather than visual styling. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.frankmtaylor.com/2026/05/13/you-dont-know-html-lists/&quot; title=&quot;Title: You don’t know HTML Lists    URL Source: https://blog.frankmtaylor.com/2026/05/13/you-dont-know-html-lists/    Published Time: 2026-05-13T12:00:00-05:00    Markdown Content:  Reading Time:  13 minutes    This second installment in the “You don’t know HTML” series is going to be all about the ways that we put collections of things together. We’re skipping over the MDN and W3Schools introductory pages and instead we’re going into the kind of stuff you discover after accidentally taking your…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide between modern web development practices and native HTML capabilities, with some users lamenting that developers often reach for complex React components instead of simpler, built-in elements &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162603&quot; title=&quot;this was a dope &amp;amp; comprehensive. unfortunately we have a new class of dev&amp;#39;s that never learned html but went straight for React. Now with LLMs they will never learn HTML. hence they reach for react components where simple html would have been sufficient.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162958&quot; title=&quot;TIL , I wonder why more frameworks don&amp;#39;t make use of it.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While the linked article is praised for its quality and depth &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162076&quot; title=&quot;This was a fun little read. Just through testing the examples, I also learned datalist does not seem to work well on mobile safari (which is a large enough market I might even say there’s essentially no scenario in which it’s worth using if there’s a compatibility issue).&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162223&quot; title=&quot;That’s a really good article. It’s nice to see something which isn’t slop.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, commenters note significant cross-platform inconsistencies, particularly with `datalist` and `optgroup` attributes failing to function correctly on Mobile Safari &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162076&quot; title=&quot;This was a fun little read. Just through testing the examples, I also learned datalist does not seem to work well on mobile safari (which is a large enough market I might even say there’s essentially no scenario in which it’s worth using if there’s a compatibility issue).&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162178&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;What if there’s a bunch of options, but for [reasons] we don’t want a user to be able to select a subset of them? Let’s add the disabled attribute to an optgroup Seems broken in mobile safari, not actually disabled I can still select the disabled items.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162181&quot; title=&quot;Good stuff, except don&amp;#39;t get too excited about `datalist`.  It just doesn&amp;#39;t have enough hooks to be actually useful for anything other than a little prototype.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162227&quot; title=&quot;Not broken, but strange since it should be working on latest Safari. https://caniuse.com/mdn-html_elements_optgroup_disabled I think it may be a Safari bug.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, users shared nostalgic &amp;#34;magic&amp;#34; HTML snippets and debated the current utility of legacy tags like `marquee` and `blink` &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162149&quot; title=&quot;This is how real HTML magic should look like: One Two Three&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162201&quot; title=&quot;One Two Three FTFY&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162519&quot; title=&quot;blink wont work, but marquee will&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-05-15/us-is-starting-to-see-heavy-job-losses-in-roles-exposed-to-ai&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;US is starting to see heavy job losses in roles exposed to AI&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bloomberg.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162354&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;162 points · &lt;strong&gt;269 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by elsewhen&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am unable to summarize the story because the provided link is blocked by a CAPTCHA and the content consists only of a security warning. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-05-15/us-is-starting-to-see-heavy-job-losses-in-roles-exposed-to-ai&quot; title=&quot;Title: Bloomberg - Are you a robot?    URL Source: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-05-15/us-is-starting-to-see-heavy-job-losses-in-roles-exposed-to-ai    Warning: Target URL returned error 403: Forbidden  Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.  Warning: This page maybe requiring CAPTCHA, please make sure you are authorized to access this page.    Markdown Content:  ## We&amp;#39;ve detected unusual activity from your computer network    To continue,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some argue that current job losses are driven by broader economic factors like tariffs or over-hiring in Big Tech &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162714&quot; title=&quot;I think people are blaming AI for a recession caused by trump’s tarrifs and the oil crisis. Businesses fear  that oil prices may explode until enough of the economy enters a recession that oil demand decreases, and are already feeling the supply crunch&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162884&quot; title=&quot;The reality no one ever wants to talk about is that big tech doesn&amp;#39;t need as many employees that it has. Anyone who has worked in big tech knows it is true.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that the impact is specifically concentrated in AI-exposed roles like customer service and sales &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162921&quot; title=&quot;This comment is completely divorced from the facts given in the article. The main point is that certain types of jobs like customer service reps, secretaries and sales people are being disproportionately affected. If it was just general fears about the economy overall one would expect a more broad-based impact.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a consensus that AI-driven replacements often result in a worse user experience, but companies prioritize the cost savings to maintain a competitive edge or satisfy investors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48163391&quot; title=&quot;Every interaction I have with AI where I previously would’ve interacted with a person is worse. Whether that’s something mundane like scheduling an appointment, use at a doctor’s office, chat support. I imagine it’s cheaper for the company deploying it, but it’s all bad. It lines up with companies being more concerned with investors than actual users and customers though.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48163456&quot; title=&quot;Ah, but it&amp;#39;s cheaper. Replace &amp;#39;AI&amp;#39; with &amp;#39;auto parts&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;store food&amp;#39; and you see the same thing. Replace &amp;#39;AI&amp;#39; with &amp;#39;police force&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;contractors&amp;#39; and it&amp;#39;s the same thing. Why is everyone and everything getting worse? A sort of &amp;#39;Prisoner&amp;#39;s dilemma&amp;#39; I suppose: no one wants to take a stand and lose their business edge just for principles sake.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Proposed responses range from political interventions to taxing high-earning tech firms to fund retraining programs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48163561&quot; title=&quot;This is why a political solution is the only way forward. I’m optimistic that people are finally fed up but who knows.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48163867&quot; title=&quot;Taxes. If these companies can afford $trillions, then the government can collect some dues that can fund retraining programs or whatever.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lcamtuf.substack.com/p/a-nicer-voltmeter-clock&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A nicer voltmeter clock&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lcamtuf.substack.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48164432&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;328 points · 43 comments · by surprisetalk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author details the construction of a custom clock that uses three analog panel voltmeters and an AVR128DB28 microcontroller to display hours, minutes, and seconds through software-controlled pulse-width modulation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lcamtuf.substack.com/p/a-nicer-voltmeter-clock&quot; title=&quot;Title: A nicer voltmeter clock    URL Source: https://lcamtuf.substack.com/p/a-nicer-voltmeter-clock    Published Time: 2026-05-16T22:41:16+00:00    Markdown Content:  Back in 2019, I built a simple voltmeter clock:    [![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The project is widely praised for its aesthetic appeal and the skillful combination of woodworking and electronics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48164968&quot; title=&quot;This is gorgeous. I really need to hunker down and learn 3d modeling. It unlocks so many options from cnc to 3d printing.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48165223&quot; title=&quot;So sexy! I could probably build the electronics easily enough, but such projects need workworking tools I just don&amp;#39;t have room for in my tiny flat. (nor would the missus be pleased for me to buy them - but that&amp;#39;s another matter)&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48165502&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s certainly nice to see the nice woodworking in combination with a simple elegant design. Ways to keep more than one brain center active!&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find the &amp;#34;reset&amp;#34; behavior of the second hand or the needle&amp;#39;s physical bounce slightly jarring &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48164931&quot; title=&quot;Nice!  Needs just a tweak to prevent the overshoot and bounce when going from high to low.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48166323&quot; title=&quot;The build itself is absolutely wonderful! This part is totally my hangup, but a second hand that has to reset bugs me to no end. :/&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others highlight how physical panel meters provide a more authentic experience than digital simulations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48164977&quot; title=&quot;Funny, I&amp;#39;ve been playing with panel-meters as well… I have an analog computer I&amp;#39;m finishing up. I have ADC&amp;#39;s to convert the analog to digital to display the values on an LCD (with an ESP32 dev board—it was more flexible than panel meters, cheaper than an oscilloscope). But because looking at &amp;#39;simulated&amp;#39; panel-meters seemed to kind of undercut the point of the analog computer, I went ahead and created a small PCB to go from my analog computer to a panel meter like the one in the clock. Running a…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The build has inspired several commenters to consider learning 3D modeling or woodworking, though some note that space constraints in small apartments remain a significant barrier &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48164968&quot; title=&quot;This is gorgeous. I really need to hunker down and learn 3d modeling. It unlocks so many options from cnc to 3d printing.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48165223&quot; title=&quot;So sexy! I could probably build the electronics easily enough, but such projects need workworking tools I just don&amp;#39;t have room for in my tiny flat. (nor would the missus be pleased for me to buy them - but that&amp;#39;s another matter)&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48164983&quot; title=&quot;In my experience, having a project/goal will make it do-able for you. You have both the motivation and an target (dare I say, North Star?) in sight.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/steipete/status/2055346265869721905&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OpenClaw Creator Spent $1.3M on OpenAI Tokens in 30 Days&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48159227&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;157 points · &lt;strong&gt;201 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by eamag&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Peter Steinberger, creator of OpenClaw, shared that the latest update to his tool CodexBar provides a significantly improved visualization of his OpenAI API costs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/steipete/status/2055346265869721905&quot; title=&quot;Title: Peter Steinberger 🦞 on X: &amp;#39;The latest CodexBar update renders API costs wayyyy nicer. https://t.co/lJ4dxNHwzG https://t.co/fCkWutJGzT&amp;#39; / X    URL Source: https://twitter.com/steipete/status/2055346265869721905    Published Time: Sun, 17 May 2026 06:00:36 GMT    Markdown Content:  Don’t miss what’s happening    People on X are the first to know.    [Log in](https://x.com/login)    [Sign up](https://x.com/i/flow/signup)    ## [](https://x.com/)    ## Post    ## Conversation    [Peter Steinberger ![Image 1:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reported $1.3M cost represents the raw consumer API value of 600 billion tokens, though as an OpenAI employee, the creator likely utilized internal access or &amp;#34;fast mode&amp;#34; subsidies that would cost a retail user significantly less through bulk subscriptions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48159678&quot; title=&quot;This is quite a misleading title because this is the raw API cost, but he (obviously) has unlimited usage as an OpenAI employee. Moreover, if you use e.g. the $200 Codex sub, you get about ~$5k-$6k monthly API usage if you spend every week of your usage, if not more, which shows that the raw API cost is not how much it (likely) costs to OpenAI, unless they&amp;#39;re subsidizing all this. He did clarify that it was with fast mode. Without fast mode it&amp;#39;d &amp;#39;only&amp;#39; be $300k in raw API cost, or ~60 $200…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48159564&quot; title=&quot;He used 600B tokens in 30 days. I use more than 150B/month with just 15 codex accounts. 60 accounts is &amp;#39;just&amp;#39; $12,000/month. So Peter could &amp;#39;save&amp;#39; 100x by using monthly accounts. Of course, he doesn&amp;#39;t have to, as he works at OpenAI now.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue this &amp;#34;grotesque&amp;#34; expenditure on multi-agent workflows—where agents write, review, and secure code—is an environmentally damaging exercise in generating features nobody asked for &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48159554&quot; title=&quot;And was he 5x more productive in those 30d than a years worth of a dev making 200k/yr? Doubtful lol, dudes killing the environment just for fun at this point.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160293&quot; title=&quot;But.... why ? Like I read his thing on how he spends the tokens [0] and it sounds like satire. He has agents write shitty code for features other agents think other people want, then has it reviewed by other agents in hopes of catching bugs that the first agent put there, then has some more agents try to find security bugs in the now double-agented code to make it triple-agented and at the end of the day, he spent a shitton of tokens, probably emitted enough carbon to heat our planet by another…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48159591&quot; title=&quot;What a clown. And Twitter bozos will cheer and clap. As far as money spent, this is still much better than rounding up and/or bombing brown people, but shows insanity of the current market. The saddest part is that bootlickers/temporarily embarrassed AI millionaires will defend this. And of course I&amp;#39;m just yet another envious hater from &amp;#39;the orange website&amp;#39;. Your conscience is clear, AI bros. /s&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. However, supporters contend that this &amp;#34;incredibly lean&amp;#34; process demonstrates the near-term future of development, noting that OpenClaw’s output speed already exceeds human capacity to assess it &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160116&quot; title=&quot;Peter shows the near-term future. Raw API consumer price cost is arbitrary. (The frontier labs can put a 100x markup to cover other operational expenses.) The true cost of inference with same-capability models keeps dropping at dizzying rates, especially at the data-center batch size. (Due to both NVidia hardware and algorithmic changes.) So the developments that Peter can achieve today with internal support from OpenAI will be doable by anyone in a few years without breaking the bank.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48159640&quot; title=&quot;OpenClaw is the fastest growth open source project ever. This isn’t clowning.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48159625&quot; title=&quot;If you review the openclaw release schedule and code output you will see that yes, he was. I’m not saying you’ll like what you see, but the openclaw release schedule is well faster than human ability to assess it.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.seangoedecke.com/steering-vectors/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;DeepSeek-V4-Flash means LLM steering is interesting again&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (seangoedecke.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160807&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;267 points · 75 comments · by Brajeshwar&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of DeepSeek-V4-Flash and the DwarfStar 4 project are reviving interest in &amp;#34;steering,&amp;#34; a technique that guides LLM behavior by manipulating internal activations, offering a potential alternative to prompting or fine-tuning for controlling local, open-weights models. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.seangoedecke.com/steering-vectors/&quot; title=&quot;Title: DeepSeek-V4-Flash means LLM steering is interesting again    URL Source: https://www.seangoedecke.com/steering-vectors/    Markdown Content:  Ever since [Golden Gate Claude](https://www.anthropic.com/news/golden-gate-claude) I’ve been fascinated with “steering”: the idea that you can guide LLM outputs by directly manipulating the activations of the model mid-flight.    ### DeepSeek V4 Flash    I was inspired to write this post by antirez’s recent project [DwarfStar…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the potential of steering vectors to dynamically &amp;#34;abliterate&amp;#34; model refusals at inference time, which allows for uncensoring specific tasks like cybersecurity research without permanently damaging general model accuracy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48161488&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m surprised the article doesn&amp;#39;t mention the biggest use of steering vectors, which is the potential to remove refusals from models (a.k.a. abliteration or uncensoring). There was an earlier paper that found that &amp;#39;most refusals are on a single vector&amp;#39;, and you can identify and &amp;#39;nerf&amp;#39; that vector so the model will skip refusals and answer &amp;#39;any&amp;#39; request normally. This was very doable for earlier models trained with SFT for refusals, seems to be a bit more complicated for newer models, but still…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48161763&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s not what people mean when they talk about censoring. They mean that models are trained to not touch some subjects, and that can spill over in legit tasks, often with humorous results (early on, there were many instances of models refusing to answer &amp;#39;how do you kill a process&amp;#39;, because of overbearing refusal training). Uncensoring a model also doesn&amp;#39;t necessarily improve generic use cases. In fact it can lead to overall less accuracy on generic tasks. But your goal with uncensoring is…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48161688&quot; title=&quot;Thank you for posting this! Just a clarification, with DwarfStar steering features I was able to completely remove refusal from DS4. It is only the example dataset (prompt pairs I provide) which is a toy, not the abilities. I thought that who is able to come up with the right dataset and understands how to use the well-documented steering feature, can access to steering. People that have no idea and would just cut &amp;amp; paste, I&amp;#39;m not sure, maybe it is a good idea if they also have access to a…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that such &amp;#34;censoring&amp;#34; is necessary to prevent the spread of falsehoods, others contend that overbearing refusal training often spills over into legitimate technical queries &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48161642&quot; title=&quot;not sure why youre fixed on censoring. if we invert your POV censoring includes not reporting falsehoods &amp;#39;vaccines are harmful&amp;#39;. Science and logic often tackle these subject via censoring, but a model given a equal sampling of Internet, would think vacinnes are harmful. a less naive correction would censor this problematic context. so im cofised as to why you think unmasking whatever bias you think is censored will result in improvement in generic use case.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48161763&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s not what people mean when they talk about censoring. They mean that models are trained to not touch some subjects, and that can spill over in legit tasks, often with humorous results (early on, there were many instances of models refusing to answer &amp;#39;how do you kill a process&amp;#39;, because of overbearing refusal training). Uncensoring a model also doesn&amp;#39;t necessarily improve generic use cases. In fact it can lead to overall less accuracy on generic tasks. But your goal with uncensoring is…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48161752&quot; title=&quot;So I need to actually check whether these actually end up on separate vectors in current models -- but as a human, there&amp;#39;s a huge behavioural difference in: - When doing this task, I should do A and not B - I should refuse to help with this task The former is learning the user&amp;#39;s preferences in how to succeed at the task; the latter is determining when to go against the user&amp;#39;s chosen task. Your example: - &amp;#39;Are vaccines harmful?&amp;#39; vs. - &amp;#39;Generate a convincing argument vaccines are harmful&amp;#39; A model…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, users debate the merits of DeepSeek-V4-Flash compared to rivals like Minimax M2.7, weighing DeepSeek&amp;#39;s architectural efficiency and generalization against reports of high hallucination rates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48161992&quot; title=&quot;I know it&amp;#39;s only tangentially relevant, but I&amp;#39;ve been baffled by the interest in DeepSeek V4 Flash. It&amp;#39;s larger, less efficient, and in many cases, performs worse on both objective benchmarks and real world sniff test (admittedly, n=1) than Minimax M2.7. DS4F hallucinates at extraordinary rates while M2.7 does not. The 196k context length that M2.7 was natively trained up represents neither a hard technical ceiling (this is metadata that can easily adjusted), nor a meaningful degradation…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162199&quot; title=&quot;M2.7 is no longer open source, it&amp;#39;s been changed to a NC license. It&amp;#39;s an OK model, but IME out of the big 5 chinese models (ds, glm, kimi, minimax and qwen), DS models have generally shown better generalisation and real-world usage than all the others, even if the benchmark scores were lower. Less benchmaxxxing, basically. DS4 also has some neat new arch improvements, giving it a lot of context at lower VRAM usage. So it will be cheaper to serve, B for B than previous models.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162328&quot; title=&quot;M2.7 was never open source, only open weight, which fulfills a lot of the spirit of open source, but isn&amp;#39;t really the same thing as a whole. The noncommercial license is basically impossible to enforce if you&amp;#39;re self-hosting anyway, because it&amp;#39;s essentially impossible to prove that any individual commit was made by Minimax M2.7 in an environment where multiple self-hosted models are being run side-by-side. Besides that, you&amp;#39;re not obligated to abide by terms you never agreed to in the first…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162450&quot; title=&quot;May I ask you what did you used for the DS4F inference? It is a model with very low hallucination rate in my tests.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://unstack.io/halt-and-catch-fire&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Halt and Catch Fire&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (unstack.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162468&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;200 points · 104 comments · by ScottWRobinson&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#34;Halt and Catch Fire&amp;#34; (HCF) is a computer engineering term for undocumented opcodes that cause a CPU to lock up, a phrase popularized by 1970s Motorola 6800 users and historical hardware bugs that could literally cause systems to overheat. &lt;a href=&quot;https://unstack.io/halt-and-catch-fire&quot; title=&quot;Title: Halt and Catch Fire    URL Source: https://unstack.io/halt-and-catch-fire    Published Time: 2026-05-15T21:31:58Z    Markdown Content:  I have never watched the AMC show _Halt and Catch Fire_, and for a long time I only knew the title, but nothing about the show. Something about it always reminded me of programmer humor: somewhat dramatic, a little absurd, and weirdly precise. Turns out, the show really is about the computer industry in the 1980s and 1990s, but the phrase itself is much older…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*Halt and Catch Fire* is widely praised for its nostalgic portrayal of the 80s and 90s computing era, capturing a time when hardware felt more transparent and computers functioned as tools rather than attention-grabbing devices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48164150&quot; title=&quot;It was a fun show. I really enjoyed it, a fictional run through the 80s and 90s computing industries.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48165831&quot; title=&quot;This show captures much of what I miss about computing in the 80s and 90s. You could get your hands on hardware, be able to largely understand what all the hardware and software was doing. You mostly used computers as tools, which only accepted commands and didn&amp;#39;t try to affect your decisions or workflow (yes, there was Clippy). The leaps forward in computing power, memory and storage were more impactful to the everyday user. There was a sense of wonder, and it didn&amp;#39;t envelop your and…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48164217&quot; title=&quot;Yeah a truly fantastic show all the way through the end. One of my favorites by far.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While many viewers laud the acting and emotional depth, some critics argue the show prioritizes &amp;#34;shoehorned&amp;#34; romance and family drama over technical accuracy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48166908&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t get why it&amp;#39;s so praised. Everybody says it&amp;#39;s about the rise of computing, and all I got was a shoehorned romance story with computers in the background. Just like all those sci-fi shows where the sci-fi is only a background to family drama.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, citing immersion-breaking details like a &amp;#34;world-class hacker&amp;#34; who types with one finger &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48164227&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s such an annoying scene in the first episode of that show that kinda broke the immersion for me. They introduced Cameron Howe as some sort of world class hacker that could do anything so one of her first scenes was her typing something.. and typing she did, one finger at a time. I mean, wtf. World class hacker that literally types one finger at a time, like she had never used a keyboard before. That scene nearly made me quit the show right there and then. Whenever I see that actress in…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite its niche status compared to shows like *Silicon Valley*, it remains a favorite for its depiction of the industry&amp;#39;s evolution, though some fans found the late-series character deaths difficult to process &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48164210&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a shame that it is such a niche show in practice. The acting of Lee Pace and Mackenzie Davis in particular are so good across all 4 seasons. I recommend it at every chance I get, but few people ever watch it. They&amp;#39;re more likely to give Silicon Valley a try.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48164362&quot; title=&quot;I have to admit, when a specific person died I was feeling so bad about it I never watched the last episode.   I still have it on the drive how many years later.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12357&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;δ-mem: Efficient Online Memory for Large Language Models&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (arxiv.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48158506&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;235 points · 59 comments · by 44za12&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Researchers have introduced $\delta$-mem, a lightweight mechanism that uses a compact, fixed-size state matrix and delta-rule learning to enhance large language models&amp;#39; long-term memory and context utilization without requiring full fine-tuning or context window expansion. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12357&quot; title=&quot;Title: $δ$-mem: Efficient Online Memory for Large Language Models    URL Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12357    Published Time: Wed, 13 May 2026 01:21:13 GMT    Markdown Content:  # [2605.12357] $δ$-mem: Efficient Online Memory for Large Language Models    [Skip to main content](https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12357#content)    [![Image 1: Cornell University Logo](https://arxiv.org/static/browse/0.3.4/images/icons/cu/cornell-reduced-white-SMALL.svg)](https://www.cornell.edu/)    [Learn about arXiv becoming…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether compressing context into a fixed-size state matrix, as proposed in the paper, can truly achieve meaningful long-term memory. Critics argue that fixed-size states face fundamental capacity limits and fail to address the need for &amp;#34;contextual search&amp;#34; where semantic abstractions lead to consistent responses &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48159120&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; δ-mem compresses past information into a fixed-size state matrix updated by delta-rule learning This doesn’t solve the capacity problem of memory. You can cram more into one context window, but then again you need to associate them with input queries. That’s very hard because slight variations in input create hugely different activations. So really, it doesn’t improve caching.  This paper might do a thing or two approximating the compression limit for context windows, but there’s a fundamental…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48164016&quot; title=&quot;While 100 million tokens sounds a lot, think about it for a bit, and you’ll see why it is basically nothing.  Try to cram a human lifetime of sounds, smells, video and more sensory data into 100 million tokens. Heck, try to process the video plot of a single series into that window.   It just won’t work, it won’t scale, and is laughable compared to contextual memory.  I’m not saying that to belittle the authors of the paper but the reality is that this has very little to do with transient long…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others point out that the theoretical ceiling for information density in such matrices is high, potentially allowing 300M parameters to encode 100M tokens &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48163578&quot; title=&quot;While there is a limit to the amount of information you can fit in a fixed-size state, the theoretical ceiling is pretty high. A Hebbian associative matrix (one of the simplest and weakest memory constructions) can store about 0.7 bits of information per parameter. If you have a state with 300M parameters (the size of a Llama 3 8B KV cache at 10K context length), and a context with 2.1 bits of entropy per token (a reasonable estimate), then the state can encode 100M tokens worth of information…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Practical alternatives suggested include utilizing shared agent-generated knowledge bases to prevent redundant computation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48158803&quot; title=&quot;The obvious energy saving step would be to utilise previous searches by others. Many of the tasks people do are rather similar, it is such an energy waste to start again each time. (Obviously ignoring the huge energy saver, which is to observe if you even need to bother doing the task at all.)&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48158964&quot; title=&quot;I had this thought and created https://pushrealm.com which is essentially a sort of Stackoverflow written by agents. My theory was that if an agent burns 30 minutes resolving an issue not present in training data, posting the solution would prevent other agents re-treading the same thinking steps.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt; and using dynamic regex-based filtering to manage context more efficiently &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48159949&quot; title=&quot;I am currently working on deep context query which uses dynamically generated regex to pull only the relevant context blocks. By using lightweight RegEx pattern matching to detect semantic intent and filter structured context sections accordingly, you avoid the attention degradation that comes from stuffing semantically redundant information into the window https://jdsemrau.substack.com/p/tokenmaxxing-and-optimizing-...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://electrek.co/2026/05/16/fisker-ocean-open-source-ev-story-after-bankruptcy/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Fisker went bankrupt and owners built an open source car company from the ashes&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (electrek.co)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48164891&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;170 points · 65 comments · by breve&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Following Fisker Inc.&amp;#39;s bankruptcy, thousands of Ocean SUV owners formed the Fisker Owners Association to keep their vehicles functional by reverse-engineering proprietary software, mapping CAN buses, and establishing an independent repair and parts network. &lt;a href=&quot;https://electrek.co/2026/05/16/fisker-ocean-open-source-ev-story-after-bankruptcy/&quot; title=&quot;Fisker went bankrupt and owners built open source car company from the ashes    After Fisker&amp;#39;s bankruptcy left 11,000 Ocean EVs orphaned, a 4,000-member community reverse-engineered software, hacked CAN buses, and kept their cars alive.    [Skip to main content](#main)    Toggle main menu    [Electrek Logo Go to the Electrek home page](https://electrek.co/)     Switch site    * [9to5Mac Logo9to5Mac](https://9to5mac.com/)  * [9to5Google Logo9to5Google](https://9to5google.com/)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The community discussion centers on the safety and reliability of software-integrated vehicles, with some users expressing fear of driving cars that lack official manufacturer updates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48165488&quot; title=&quot;How involved is the software in the car, any while driving features? I&amp;#39;d be a little bit afraid of getting in that car even with the best efforts of the community, maybe it&amp;#39;s not really for driving, i&amp;#39;d be even more nervous to get in a car with no updates, but still.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; while others advocate for open-source software to ensure owner control and modifiability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48165323&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d buy any Tesla, even the big truck, if it came with open source software! I don&amp;#39;t want a car that&amp;#39;s spyware like a phone. Let me be in control of it, let me mod it, let me own it. Who&amp;#39;s going to sell me one?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant portion of the thread debates whether mechanical failures are software-driven, specifically regarding a user&amp;#39;s experience with &amp;#34;jammed&amp;#34; brakes and steering that were likely caused by a loss of power assistance rather than a software lock &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48165608&quot; title=&quot;A few days back, the breaks of my car suddenly stopped working. By stopped-working I mean they just got jammed. No matter how much I press, they just wouldn&amp;#39;t budge. The reason: my car had abruptly turned-off by itself, jamming the breaks with it. HOW TF are breaks NOT connected directly to the tyres? Why the tf they have to be software controlled? This is the &amp;#39;critical&amp;#39; path, and SHOULD be 100% under driver&amp;#39;s control, at all times. And then just 3 days back, the same thing happened with…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48165762&quot; title=&quot;What model? Is it possible that you accidentally had the car in a power-on mode, but without the engine started? I&amp;#39;ve done that by accident in my Mitsubishi Outlander Sport. The symptoms are similar to what you describe. Actually, it was at a car wash -- attendant left the car power on and I thought the engine was running so tried to drive away. Got the car to move a bit (happened to be downhill) but it was super scary because the brake pedal was taking more and more force to push down and I…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48165857&quot; title=&quot;Yep yep yep.. that explains it. Not the software fault as I original suspected (at least in the break-jamming case). What I &amp;#39;felt&amp;#39; like jammed was probably just that vacuum system not helping, but since it happened for the first time (with me), and so abruptly, it felt like the brakes were jammed. But, the worrying, and a lot more scarier part is that this was not me accidentally leaving the car in accessory/power-on mode. The engine cut out while I was driving, which is itself a serious fault.…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some participants highlight the necessity of &amp;#34;stomping&amp;#34; on brakes during emergencies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48166312&quot; title=&quot;Funfact4life, even with modern cars in emergency braking scenarios you _still_ want to STAND on that brake pedal with all your weight! ...ooh, a mnemonic: &amp;#39;STOMP, STAY and STEER&amp;#39;. (Stomp brake, Stay stomped, Steer around obstacles while pressing brake hard.) Even if it vibrates! [Grand]pa had to &amp;#39;pump&amp;#39; his brakes (on/off/on/off), we have it easier :)&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others criticize the linked article&amp;#39;s quality, suggesting it may have been generated by AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48165695&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; We had reviewed the Ocean in late 2023 and found the hardware genuinely attractive — but the software was simply not ready for prime time. The irony of that headline — “Coming soon, in a future software update” — now reads like an epitaph. Those future updates never came from Fisker. They came from the owners themselves. It’s sad to see a good site put out bad AI writing like this.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48165690&quot; title=&quot;This reads very AI. Pangram [0] agrees [1]. [0] Not perfect, but I think as good evidence as any: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.15654 [1] https://www.pangram.com/history/44cd07d3-ba94-4331-8c7f-a626...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://labs.randomquark.com/alphabet_cards/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Greek Alphabet Cards&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (labs.randomquark.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48159354&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;146 points · 64 comments · by ricochet11&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A designer created a set of Greek alphabet cards that use AI-generated illustrations to help children learn through visual associations, where each object is drawn to resemble the shape of its starting letter. &lt;a href=&quot;https://labs.randomquark.com/alphabet_cards/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Greek Alphabet Cards    URL Source: https://labs.randomquark.com/alphabet_cards/    Published Time: Sat, 16 May 2026 10:53:18 GMT    Markdown Content:  Side Project · 2026    ## Greek Alphabet    _Cards_    A set of cards I made to help my kids learn the Greek alphabet through visual associations — each object is drawn so that it looks like the letter its name begins with.    ![Image 1: The full deck of Greek alphabet cards, laid out…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters emphasize that mastering the Greek alphabet is a vital prerequisite for math and science, as it prevents confusion over notation and speeds up the processing of complex formulas &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48160698&quot; title=&quot;Very handy. My math education would have gone much better if my notes weren&amp;#39;t full of &amp;#39;lambda is the half stickman; sigma is upside down Q or broken E&amp;#39; and other really silly things&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48161221&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, they should mark the Greek alphabet as a mandatory prerequisite for college math. It had an unreasonable effect on how quickly I was processing notation-heavy math after learning some Greek for going on a trip over there.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest using grammar books to solidify these letters in memory &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48161283&quot; title=&quot;Get a decent Greek grammar book and go through the first couple chapters, even if you don’t plan to complete the book.  After completing the exercises you’ll be amazed by how quickly the Greek alphabet stuck.  Repeat every 10 years if necessary.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, a debate exists regarding pronunciation: English speakers often use a &amp;#34;classical&amp;#34; approximation that differs significantly from both modern Greek and reconstructed ancient Greek &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48161649&quot; title=&quot;As I say above, the issue is that modern Greek pronounces some letters very differently. We use the classical pronunciation in maths etc.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48164397&quot; title=&quot;What you call &amp;#39;classical pronunciation&amp;#39; is really at best an approximation of the ancient Greek pronunciation, but mixed heavily with English (after some frolicking around in Latin). As far as I know, this is limited to English speakers only. For example, π is pronounced &amp;#39;πι&amp;#39;, or probably closed to &amp;#39;pee&amp;#39; in modern and in ancient Greek. It&amp;#39;s never pronounced like &amp;#39;pie&amp;#39;. Same with all letters that end with &amp;#39;i&amp;#39;, for example &amp;#39;φ,χ,ψ&amp;#39; (pronounced as phee, chee, psee, never rhyming with pie). T (τ)…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48166543&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; For example, π is pronounced &amp;#39;πι&amp;#39;, or probably close[?] to &amp;#39;pee&amp;#39; in modern and in ancient Greek. No. In ancient Greek, π contrasts with φ. Φ is the one that indicates the sound an English speaker would hear as &amp;#39;p&amp;#39;; it&amp;#39;s the one you would pronounce &amp;#39;pee&amp;#39;. You&amp;#39;d hear the name of π as &amp;#39;bee&amp;#39;. &amp;gt; T (τ) was never pronounced as &amp;#39;ta-oo&amp;#39;, either, not in ancient nor modern Greek. That&amp;#39;s exactly how it was pronounced in ancient Greek (modulo the same issue as π), unless you meant to indicate a disyllabic…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, while some view the alphabet as a tool for foundational Western education &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48163153&quot; title=&quot;Modern Greek is, frankly, irrelevant. Ancient Greek is needed to get a full Western education, for reading some of our foundational literature properly.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others see these cards simply as a basic resource for teaching letter forms to children &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162080&quot; title=&quot;No it&amp;#39;s not.  It&amp;#39;s about teaching letter forms to kids.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.blocksandfiles.com/flash/2026/05/14/kioxia-and-dell-cram-10-pb-into-slim-2ru-server/5240574&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Kioxia and Dell cram 10 PB into slim 2RU server&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blocksandfiles.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48161997&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;121 points · 84 comments · by rbanffy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dell is utilizing Kioxia’s 245.76 TB LC9 QLC SSDs to equip its PowerEdge R7725xd server, achieving nearly 10 PB of all-flash storage in a 2RU chassis designed for AI infrastructure and massive data ingestion. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.blocksandfiles.com/flash/2026/05/14/kioxia-and-dell-cram-10-pb-into-slim-2ru-server/5240574&quot; title=&quot;Title: Kioxia and Dell cram 10 PB into slim 2RU server    URL Source: https://www.blocksandfiles.com/flash/2026/05/14/kioxia-and-dell-cram-10-pb-into-slim-2ru-server/5240574    Published Time: 2026-05-14T14:21:26.000Z    Markdown Content:  # Kioxia and Dell cram 10 PB into slim 2RU server  [Jump to main content](https://www.blocksandfiles.com/flash/2026/05/14/kioxia-and-dell-cram-10-pb-into-slim-2ru-server/5240574#main)    Search     Topics    *   [AI/ML](https://www.blocksandfiles.com/tag/AI-ML)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The announcement of a 10 PB 2RU server sparked a debate over the feasibility of orbital data centers, with some suggesting high-density storage could enable space-based CDNs to reduce constellation traffic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162748&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s been a lot of talk about orbital DCs lately, but with these levels of density, orbital CDNs might be a more obvious usecase. It would be interesting to see if something like Starlink can use something like this to cache media content and reduce their overall data moving through the constellation. It could even be worth it to have some satellites in higher orbits (even GEO if the ground hw can reach it) dedicated to streaming media content. You can tolerate higher RTT for content that…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue that such density is an &amp;#34;anti-feature&amp;#34; in space due to extreme heat dissipation challenges and the vulnerability of small process nodes to radiation degradation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48163216&quot; title=&quot;no, absolutely not. orbital datacenters are never going to happen, it doesn&amp;#39;t matter whether you try to frame them as compute or storage or whatever else. the extreme density of these SSDs is actually an anti-feature in the context of spacecraft hardware. the RAD750 CPU [0] for example uses a 150nm process node. its successor the RAD5500 [1] is down to 45nm. that&amp;#39;s an order of magnitude larger than chips currently made for terrestrial uses. radiation-hardening involves a lot of things, but in…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, though others point out that modern satellites are already successfully utilizing 7nm chips &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48163698&quot; title=&quot;AFAICT[1] the latest generation of SpaceX Starlink satellites use AMD Versal XQR SoCs, which are built on a 7nm process with components like the main processor (dual-core ARM Cortex A-72) and memory (DDR4) clocked in the gigahertz, not megahertz, range.[2] At least some of these SoCs models (presumably the lower-clocked ones) are certified for geosynchronous orbits, not just low-earth orbits. [1] https://www.pcmag.com/news/amd-chips-are-powering-newest-sta... [2]…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond aerospace, users discussed the prohibitive cost—estimated between $500k and $1M &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48163020&quot; title=&quot;At current enterprise NVMe prices, the drives alone for this must easily push past the $500k to $1M mark. It&amp;#39;s fascinating to see this level of density, but it’s strictly going to be hyperscaler or high-end defense/research budget territory for a long time.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;—and expressed a desire for this density to eventually reach consumer form factors for personal data hoarding &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162842&quot; title=&quot;Some wealthy techbro from /r/datahoarders is going to purchase this to store all episodes of Doctor Who in uncompressed 10-bit 4:2:2 FFV1 Matroska remuxes with redundant PAR2 recovery archives.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162454&quot; title=&quot;Can&amp;#39;t wait to move my spinning rust NAS to this in 20 years.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48163010&quot; title=&quot;Not quite yet. The interesting thing here is ~256TB in a single drive, but it&amp;#39;s in E3.L form factor. I have about 160TB on hard drives that I&amp;#39;m waiting to offload onto a single SSD. But that needs to come with a connector that has adapters to USB-C, so I can attach it to my Macbook Neo. Hopefully they get it a bit more dense soon and into the 2.5&amp;#39; NVMe form.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-15</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-15</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/mitchellh/status/2055380239711457578&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I believe there are entire companies right now under AI psychosis&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48153379&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2077 points&lt;/strong&gt; · &lt;strong&gt;1232 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by reasonableklout&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mitchell Hashimoto suggests that some companies are experiencing &amp;#34;AI psychosis&amp;#34; by prioritizing artificial intelligence integration over fundamental product quality and user needs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/mitchellh/status/2055380239711457578&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;mitchellh&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2055380239711457578&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;mitchellh&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2055380239711457578&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;hachyderm.io&amp;amp;#x2F;@mitchellh&amp;amp;#x2F;116580433508108130&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;hachyderm.io&amp;amp;#x2F;@mitchellh&amp;amp;#x2F;116580433508108130&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on &amp;#34;AI psychosis,&amp;#34; defined as the outsourcing of critical thinking and decision-making to pattern-matching models that often produce generic or flawed results &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48154116&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m pretty sure he&amp;#39;s talking about companies and people outsourcing their decision making and thinking to AI and not really about using AI itself. I don&amp;#39;t think using AI to write code is AI psychosis or bad at all, but if you just prompt the AI and believe what it tell you then you have AI psychosis. You see this a lot with financial people and VC on twitter. They literally post screenshots of ChatGPT as their thinking and reasoning about the topic instead of just doing a little bit of thinking…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users report successfully using AI to ship higher-quality features and address tech debt within standardized environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48156996&quot; title=&quot;I feel like I&amp;#39;m in a different field compared to the rest of hacker news. I&amp;#39;m in a big tech company where everything is standardised. All our microservices have the same tech stack. We&amp;#39;re in a monorepo. Most microservices are... I wouldn&amp;#39;t say tiny or micro but small enough. And I haven&amp;#39;t written a single line of code myself since what - February maybe? We still haven&amp;#39;t seen an increase in incidents, we ship more features at a higher quality. We address the tech debt we didn&amp;#39;t have time for in…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others warn of a looming &amp;#34;complexity crisis&amp;#34; where AI-generated systems become too unstable for humans to understand or repair &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48154496&quot; title=&quot;I think AI rescue consulting is going to be come a significant mode of high value consulting, similar to specialists who come in to try and deal with a security breach or do data recovery. Purely AI written systems will scale to a point of complexity that no human can ever understand and the defect close rate will taper down and the token burn per defect rate scale up and eventually AI changes will cause on average more defects than they close and the whole system will be unstable. It will…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48154583&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Purely AI written systems will scale to a point of complexity that no human can ever understand and the defect close rate will taper down and the token burn per defect rate scale up and eventually AI changes will cause on average more defects than they close and the whole system will be unstable. Wow, it’s true, AI really is set to match human performance on large, complex software systems! ;)&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable anecdotes include a non-technical individual winning hospital contracts through &amp;#34;vibecoding&amp;#34; only to face immediate deployment and data-state failures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48154641&quot; title=&quot;A non-technical friend of mine has just won some hospital contracts after vibecoding w/ Claude an inventory management solution for them. They gave him access to IT dept servers and he called me extremely lost on how to deploy (cant connect Claude to them) and also frustrated because the app has some sort of interesting data/state issues.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, leading to predictions that &amp;#34;AI rescue consulting&amp;#34; will become a necessary high-value industry &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48154496&quot; title=&quot;I think AI rescue consulting is going to be come a significant mode of high value consulting, similar to specialists who come in to try and deal with a security breach or do data recovery. Purely AI written systems will scale to a point of complexity that no human can ever understand and the defect close rate will taper down and the token burn per defect rate scale up and eventually AI changes will cause on average more defects than they close and the whole system will be unstable. It will…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48154799&quot; title=&quot;This might not pan out to be the glorious victory of human craft as you’re imagining it to be. Here’s a slightly different future - these AI rescue consultants are bots too, just trained for this purpose. Plausible? I have already experienced claude 4.7 handle pretty complex refactors without issues. Scale and correctness aren’t even 1% of the issue it was last year. You just have to get the high level design right, or explicitly ask it critique your design before building it.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.gutenberg.org/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Project Gutenberg – keeps getting better&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (gutenberg.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48150431&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1207 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 275 comments · by JSeiko&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Project Gutenberg offers a library of over 75,000 free, volunteer-proofread eBooks, primarily focusing on classic literature with expired U.S. copyrights available in Kindle, epub, and online formats. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.gutenberg.org/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Project Gutenberg    URL Source: https://www.gutenberg.org/    Published Time: Fri, 15 May 2026 20:09:23 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Free eBooks | Project Gutenberg    - [x]     [![Image 1: Project Gutenberg](https://www.gutenberg.org/gutenberg/pg-logo-new.jpg)](https://www.gutenberg.org/)    X Go!    [Donate](https://www.gutenberg.org/donate/)    About▼     [About Project Gutenberg](https://www.gutenberg.org/about/)[Reading Options &amp;amp; Kindle](https://www.gutenberg.org/help/reading_options.html)[Contact…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Project Gutenberg is undergoing significant site improvements, though developers admit they are currently struggling with performance issues caused by massive amounts of bot traffic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48150432&quot; title=&quot;Hi! I&amp;#39;m one of the programmers at Gutenberg.  We&amp;#39;ve been improving the site a lot over the past few months (and more is coming!).  If you haven&amp;#39;t visited the page recently, it&amp;#39;s worth checking out again: https://www.gutenberg.org/&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48153106&quot; title=&quot;Huh that&amp;#39;s interesting: 4.5 seconds for the TCP handshake and an additional 9.2 seconds for the TLS handshake. Is this some kind of captcha, since most bots would disconnect before that, so if you complete it once then it knows you&amp;#39;re good? (Until the bots catch on of course, but so long as it works it&amp;#39;s relatively unintrusive and not discriminatory against uncommon client software (that is, non-Chrome/ium).) The rest of the requests were lightning fast Edit: welcome to your first comment after…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48153346&quot; title=&quot;we are having occasional lows in page speed performance due to LARGE amounts of bot traffic. full disclosure - we&amp;#39;ve not really been able to resolve this fully/well. Let us know if you have a good idea for how to deal with it&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Users expressed frustration that major eBook vendors do not offer native integration for the library, forcing readers to rely on manual transfers or third-party tools like Calibre &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48150878&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m surprised no eBook Reader vendor has a Project Gutenberg &amp;#39;Store.&amp;#39; Where you can just browse Gutenberg, find a book, and just grab it down to the reader. Instead, they either are actively hostile (Kindle), or require the use of Calibre (which itself is good, it is just the friction).&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48151071&quot; title=&quot;As a Kindle user, I still miss the old version of the site. The new one looks great on normal desktop, but the old one was simple enough to load and directly download books on the device&amp;#39;s built-in browser.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some contributors appreciate the site&amp;#39;s long history and transition to ePub formats, others still prefer the high-fidelity scans found on Archive.org or criticize the lack of professional formatting in plaintext-derived files &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48151054&quot; title=&quot;Project Gutenberg had (has?) a tendency toward plaintext that always put me off. (And it has been over a decade I&amp;#39;m sure since I explored the site—so I am no doubt now misinformed.) I like a styled formatted book—would prefer PDFs. (I know, not a popular format apparently.) I like the idea of Project Gutenberg but guess I found book scans on archive.org my preference. My go-to example is Lewis Carroll&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;Through the Looking Glass&amp;#39; with the fantastic art of John Tenniel and Carroll&amp;#39;s sometimes…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48151608&quot; title=&quot;Used to be one could sort of get that with the Project Librivox: https://librivox.org/ e-book app Gutebooks (in addition to their audio app), but it seems to have been deprecated (I&amp;#39;m no longer able to connect to the server on my copy (which I only got &amp;#39;cause there was an in-app purchase to fund Project Librivox). FWIW, Barnes &amp;amp; Noble has been plundering the public domain using a book composition/keying house in the Philippines to make their public domain books which they make available in…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48150756&quot; title=&quot;While PG has probably gotten a lot of use and growth with the growth/maintreaming of the Internet since the 1990s, (TIL) it started back in 1971: &amp;gt; Michael S. Hart began Project Gutenberg in 1971 with the digitization of the United States Declaration of Independence.[5] Hart, a student at the University of Illinois, obtained access to a Xerox Sigma V mainframe computer in the university&amp;#39;s Materials Research Lab. […] This computer was one of the 15 nodes on ARPANET, the computer network that…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, users in certain regions like Italy reported being unable to access the site due to judicial seizures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48153300&quot; title=&quot;From Italy, https://www.gutenberg.org/ gives a 404 error and https://gutenberg.org/ opens a very official-looking page stating &amp;#39;police notice. This site is under judicial seizure&amp;#39; and references a sentence number: &amp;#39;criminal proceedings 52127/20 R.N.R.I. tribunal of Rome&amp;#39; Any idea what&amp;#39;s happening?  I thought PG published public domain books...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2026/05/bill-to-keep-online-games-playable-clears-key-hurdle-in-california/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bill to block publishers from killing online games advances in California&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (arstechnica.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152994&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;593 points · 405 comments · by Lihh27&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;California’s Protect Our Games Act, which recently cleared a key committee, would require publishers to provide refunds or offline patches to keep digital games playable after their servers are shut down. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2026/05/bill-to-keep-online-games-playable-clears-key-hurdle-in-california/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Bill to block publishers from killing online games advances in California    URL Source: https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2026/05/bill-to-keep-online-games-playable-clears-key-hurdle-in-california/    Published Time: 2026-05-15T16:35:54+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Bill to block publishers from killing online games advances in California - Ars Technica    Privacy Center    Currently, only residents from GDPR countries and certain US states can opt out of Tracking Technologies through our Consent…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Proponents argue that requiring 60-day notices or the release of server binaries would prevent the loss of purchased content and restore the historical standard of community-hosted servers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48153843&quot; title=&quot;It seems like the fair solution to this problem is to open source server code if you are going to cease support for an online game.  That way the community has the opportunity to run their own servers if they want to. I also really support giving 60 day notice if an online game is going to shut down.  Places I have worked have had policies like that for games they are sun setting and I think the best game publishers think a lot about how to do that operation.  It&amp;#39;s not simple, because if people…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48154348&quot; title=&quot;It doesn&amp;#39;t need to be open source, you only need to provide server binaries to download. This was the standard until circa 2010. People were able to host dedicated servers themselves.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. However, industry veterans highlight that open-sourcing modern server code is a massive legal and engineering undertaking due to complex microservice architectures, third-party licensed libraries, and potential security risks to a company&amp;#39;s other active titles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48154801&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; open source server code if you are going to cease support When I was a senior exec at a big public tech company, there was a product we decided to discontinue and we thought would be nice to just open source. Somehow I ended up in charge of managing that process and was shocked at how complex, time-consuming and expensive it was in a multi-billion dollar, publicly-traded corp vs some code my friends and I wrote. Legal had to verify that there was no licensed library code used and that we had…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48153595&quot; title=&quot;So now it becomes way more expensive for small studios to come out with games that have online features. This is a huge win for big studios who will suck up all that market share. Handing over a standalone server to the public is a massive engineering, financial, and legal headache. Modern multiplayer games rarely run on a single isolated program. They rely on a huge network of interconnected cloud microservices. A single match might require separate proprietary systems for matchmaking, player…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics warn these requirements could create significant financial liabilities, potentially bankrupting small studios or pushing the industry toward more aggressive monetization models like subscriptions and ads &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48155016&quot; title=&quot;And makes it more expensive. There is the seen benefit and then the unseen cost. Every game released will have to account for the possibility of it, and will create issues for people who really didn&amp;#39;t want those issues. After awhile people will forget there are associated issues and costs, but they will still be there.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48155502&quot; title=&quot;I happen to be shutting down an online game right now. https://www.tyleo.com/blog/sunsetting-rec-room-how-to-give-a... The sad truth is that these things have high operating costs, especially if they need moderation. I would guess this bill just makes it more risky to make the games in the first place. It’s already brutally hard to make money on games. I feel like the effect of this might just be that shutting an online game makes it more likely to take a whole company down if you have to issue…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48153595&quot; title=&quot;So now it becomes way more expensive for small studios to come out with games that have online features. This is a huge win for big studios who will suck up all that market share. Handing over a standalone server to the public is a massive engineering, financial, and legal headache. Modern multiplayer games rarely run on a single isolated program. They rely on a huge network of interconnected cloud microservices. A single match might require separate proprietary systems for matchmaking, player…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tmctmt.com/posts/mullvad-exit-ips-as-a-fingerprinting-vector/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mullvad exit IPs are surprisingly identifying&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tmctmt.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48143880&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;599 points · 376 comments · by RGBCube&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mullvad VPN’s practice of deterministically assigning exit IPs based on a user&amp;#39;s WireGuard key creates a fingerprinting vector that can correlate different sessions to the same user. By analyzing IP ranges across multiple servers, researchers found they could narrow a user&amp;#39;s identity to a small percentage of the total userbase. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tmctmt.com/posts/mullvad-exit-ips-as-a-fingerprinting-vector/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Mullvad exit IPs as a fingerprinting vector    URL Source: https://tmctmt.com/posts/mullvad-exit-ips-as-a-fingerprinting-vector/    Published Time: 2026-05-14T00:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Mullvad exit IPs as a fingerprinting vector | tmctmt  [Skip to main content](https://tmctmt.com/posts/mullvad-exit-ips-as-a-fingerprinting-vector/#main-content)# [tmctmt](https://tmctmt.com/)[Posts](https://tmctmt.com/posts/)[RSS](https://tmctmt.com/index.xml)  # Mullvad exit IPs as a fingerprinting…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mullvad&amp;#39;s co-CEO acknowledged that certain exit IP behaviors allow for highly accurate user identification, noting that while some aspects were intended for user experience, a patch is already being tested for unintended flaws &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144415&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; As an example, imagine that you are a moderator on a forum and you suspect that a new face is actually a sockpuppet of a user you banned the day prior.  You check the IP logs, and despite using different Mullvad servers, both accounts resolve to the overlapping float ranges 0.4334 - 0.4428 and 0.4358 - 0.4423. This gives you a &amp;gt;99% chance that they are the same person. This sounds like how I&amp;#39;d design a VPN if I were an intelligence agency.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48145679&quot; title=&quot;I work at Mullvad. (co-CEO, co-founder) Some aspects of the described behavior are as we intended and some are not. The cause is not exactly as described in the blog post. As for mitigation, we are already testing a patch of the unintended behavior on a subset of our infrastructure. If any of you try to reproduce the blog post&amp;#39;s findings you may get confusing results throughout the day. We will also re-evaluate whether the intended behaviors are acceptable or not. Some of this is a trade-off…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. The discovery sparked a debate over the utility of VPNs, with some labeling them &amp;#34;snake oil&amp;#34; due to public exit IPs while others argued they are essential for shifting trust away from ISPs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144154&quot; title=&quot;VPNs are snake oil. Exit IPs are a public information.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144195&quot; title=&quot;VPNs are not snake oil. They transfer the trust of your internet activity from a place of low-trust, your ISP, to a place of high-trust, ideally a trustworthy VPN like Mullvad, IVPN, or Proton. Among other benefits. If you don&amp;#39;t like your ISP creating a profile of you and selling it to target ads to you, you should use a VPN. &amp;gt;Should I use a VPN? Yes, almost certainly. A VPN has many advantages, including: 1. Hiding your traffic from only your Internet Service Provider. 2. Hiding your downloads…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the thread criticized the researcher for not practicing responsible disclosure, though others pointed out Mullvad’s lack of a formal bug bounty program &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48145679&quot; title=&quot;I work at Mullvad. (co-CEO, co-founder) Some aspects of the described behavior are as we intended and some are not. The cause is not exactly as described in the blog post. As for mitigation, we are already testing a patch of the unintended behavior on a subset of our infrastructure. If any of you try to reproduce the blog post&amp;#39;s findings you may get confusing results throughout the day. We will also re-evaluate whether the intended behaviors are acceptable or not. Some of this is a trade-off…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48145798&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Finally, for those of you who do security research: when you find a security or privacy issue, please consider notifying the maintainer/vendor before publishing your findings How to report a bug or vulnerability      ... we (currently) have no bug bounty program ... send an email to support@mullvadvpn.net https://mullvad.net/en/help/how-report-bug-or-vulnerability / https://archive.vn/BeHhr&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147750&quot; title=&quot;Are you seriously suggesting people shouldn&amp;#39;t operate with a bit of common decency unless they&amp;#39;re going to get some money out of it?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://macdailynews.com/2026/05/15/u-s-doj-demands-apple-and-google-unmask-over-100000-users-of-popular-car-tinkering-app-in-emissions-crackdown/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;U.S. DOJ demands Apple and Google unmask over 100k users of car-tinkering app&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (macdailynews.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48151383&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;473 points · 351 comments · by tencentshill&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The U.S. Department of Justice has subpoenaed Apple, Google, Amazon, and Walmart to identify over 100,000 users of EZ Lynk’s Auto Agent app, alleging the software is used to bypass vehicle emissions controls in violation of the Clean Air Act. &lt;a href=&quot;https://macdailynews.com/2026/05/15/u-s-doj-demands-apple-and-google-unmask-over-100000-users-of-popular-car-tinkering-app-in-emissions-crackdown/&quot; title=&quot;Title: U.S. DOJ demands Apple and Google unmask over 100,000 users of popular car-tinkering app in emissions crackdown    URL Source: https://macdailynews.com/2026/05/15/u-s-doj-demands-apple-and-google-unmask-over-100000-users-of-popular-car-tinkering-app-in-emissions-crackdown/    Published Time: 2026-05-15T14:30:37+00:00    Markdown Content:  # U.S. DOJ demands Apple and Google unmask over 100,000 users of popular car-tinkering app in emissions crackdown    [Skip to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The DOJ&amp;#39;s demand for user data is widely criticized as a &amp;#34;gross privacy intrusion&amp;#34; and an overreach, with commenters arguing that the government should target specific violators rather than every user of a tool with legal applications &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48151642&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The government says it needs this information to identify and interview witnesses who can testify about how the tools were actually used. Why start this whole thing, if you don&amp;#39;t already have this information and have people willing to help you as witnesses? Sounds to me they&amp;#39;re saying they don&amp;#39;t have this already, but why is this investigation happening in the first place then? Rather than finding every user of the tool, find the users who use the tool in the way you don&amp;#39;t approve of, then…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48151935&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, I&amp;#39;d HAPPILY report every single truck rolling coal around me if there was a place to report that information. Hell, I&amp;#39;ve seen a truck roll coal around cop cars and, obviously, nothing happened. This is just gross privacy intrusion masquerading as &amp;#39;protecting the environment&amp;#39;.  We don&amp;#39;t need 100% compliance to the law and simple prosecution/ticketing of obvious violations would go a long way towards solving the problem outright.  Much like we didn&amp;#39;t need our cars emailing prosecutors every…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48151611&quot; title=&quot;Worth pointing out that this is part of a much larger encroachment on user privacy, and not just in the US: https://community.qbix.com/t/increasing-state-of-surveillanc...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While there is strong consensus that &amp;#34;rolling coal&amp;#34; is a harmful nuisance that warrants enforcement, many believe traditional policing or reporting systems are more appropriate than mass digital surveillance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48151935&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, I&amp;#39;d HAPPILY report every single truck rolling coal around me if there was a place to report that information. Hell, I&amp;#39;ve seen a truck roll coal around cop cars and, obviously, nothing happened. This is just gross privacy intrusion masquerading as &amp;#39;protecting the environment&amp;#39;.  We don&amp;#39;t need 100% compliance to the law and simple prosecution/ticketing of obvious violations would go a long way towards solving the problem outright.  Much like we didn&amp;#39;t need our cars emailing prosecutors every…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152071&quot; title=&quot;I watched a pickup roll coal in the middle of freaking East Bay, literally within site of downtown San Francisco, on a bicyclist. I reported their license to the California Air Resources Board, and not longer after that I saw it up on jacks in a neighborhood auto shop. That made my day. Asshole.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152322&quot; title=&quot;I was on a bike ride with my young kid. We were going up a hill and being passed by a lifted diesel truck. I could tell that the driver was desperately working the throttle to avoid accidentally blowing smoke in my kids&amp;#39; face. Congratulations, buddy. You&amp;#39;ve designed your life around being such a massive unlikeable asshole to random strangers. But for a brief moment you understood shame. I&amp;#39;m generally pretty libertarian, but I&amp;#39;m all for throwing the book at these guys.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Some suggest that users should seek anonymous alternatives like F-Droid to avoid such data collection, while others debate whether the environmental impact justifies stricter regulations on diesel engines altogether &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152855&quot; title=&quot;This &amp;#39;car-tinkering app&amp;#39; is used as a glorified GameShark for deleting factory emissions controls, I don&amp;#39;t feel sorry for anyone who uses this to roll coal or whatever. Instead of investigating everyone on the list of users of this app, should the government instead ban diesel engines knowing their emissions controls software will be defeated?  Should environmental regulations be relaxed? What is really the solution here?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48151869&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s why you should be downloading from F-Droid anonymously.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.fastcompany.com/91541586/amazon-workers-pressured-to-up-ai-use-extraneous-tasks&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Amazon workers under pressure to up their AI usage are making up tasks&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (fastcompany.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148337&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;395 points · &lt;strong&gt;428 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by hackernj&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Amazon employees are reportedly creating unproductive AI agents and extraneous tasks to inflate their &amp;#34;AI token&amp;#34; usage in response to corporate pressure to meet high internal activity targets. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.fastcompany.com/91541586/amazon-workers-pressured-to-up-ai-use-extraneous-tasks&quot; title=&quot;Title: Amazon workers are under pressure to up their AI usage—so they’re making up extraneous tasks    URL Source: https://www.fastcompany.com/91541586/amazon-workers-pressured-to-up-ai-use-extraneous-tasks    Published Time: 2026-05-13T19:30:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Amazon workers pressured to up AI use are making up extraneous tasks - Fast Company    ![Image 2: Hamburger menu icon](https://www.fastcompany.com/_public/3_line_burger.svg)  LOGIN    [![Image 3: Fast company…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hacker News commenters describe a &amp;#34;bonkers&amp;#34; corporate environment where Big Tech employees are incentivized to maximize AI token usage, often leading to performative waste and &amp;#34;magical thinking&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48149107&quot; title=&quot;Not just Amazon, too. It feels like all of big tech (and some smaller firms) have simultaneously gone insane. Imagine if your CEO woke up one day and told the company: &amp;#39;We need to encourage travel spending. Please book as many business trips as you can, and spend as much money as possible. Fly first class to our satellite offices! Take limos instead of Ubers! Eat at fine restaurants! Make sure you are constantly traveling. In fact, we are going to make Travel Spending part of your annual…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48151461&quot; title=&quot;At my company we were told AI spend was part of perf review and that the &amp;#39;singularity&amp;#39; had happened. Now 20% of our infrastructure spend is tokens. The average number of pull requests per dev per week increased with all this spend. From 4.2 to 5.1. And that includes a huge chunk of PRs that are just agents changing a line or two in a config. It&amp;#39;s all magical thinking&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Anecdotes include workers receiving accolades for creating agents that intentionally burn tokens &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48149826&quot; title=&quot;I know some that was told to try and use AI more on the job so they created some agent to just burn tokens and ended up using about 10x what the next highest employee used. Buddy expected to get shit but instead got an accolade and was asked to give a short talk to the other employees about how they could match their success.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; and using expensive LLMs to perform tasks that previously required a single command &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148711&quot; title=&quot;Like six months ago we got a presentation from an AWS guy on the AI tooling available and how it fit with our particular use cases. At one point seemingly out of nowhere he pointed out on his screen share &amp;#39;Look at how many tokens I&amp;#39;ve used this month. I run so much Opus.&amp;#39; It was a number that was offensively large. I remember thinking &amp;#39;That&amp;#39;s a really odd flex, this crap is so expensive the fact that you use so much should be a red flag&amp;#39; He demonstrated a number of Claude Code use cases he had…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this shift lowers the barrier to entry for complex work &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48149550&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; You&amp;#39;ve used AI to do something that was a single command Yes, and that’s a good thing! This is in fact where a lot of AI value lies. You dont need to know that command anymore - knowing the functional contract is now sufficient to perform the requisite work duties. This is huge!&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt; or overcomes initial engineer resistance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48150931&quot; title=&quot;I kind of get what they&amp;#39;re thinking in trying to make sure all engineers use AI. For myself, and for the engineers working with me, I saw everyone go through an initial aversion and resistance to AI, and then an instant productivity boost when we started using them. So there&amp;#39;s definitely a good reason to get everybody to start using AI. You don&amp;#39;t want a good engineer resisting AI indefinitely if you know it will make them more productive. Incentivizing people who are already using AI to use as…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others compare the forced quotas to Soviet-era inefficiencies that ignore environmental costs and actual productivity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48149217&quot; title=&quot;Lots of people reporting their &amp;#39;I had to use up my tokens, so I burned them on worthless stuff&amp;#39; stories. Incredible thing to do in a climate emergency. Push harder guys, maybe we can hit 3C warming? This reminds me of the story of how the USSR nearly made whales extinct to meet a quota for whale meat that nobody wanted to eat.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48151461&quot; title=&quot;At my company we were told AI spend was part of perf review and that the &amp;#39;singularity&amp;#39; had happened. Now 20% of our infrastructure spend is tokens. The average number of pull requests per dev per week increased with all this spend. From 4.2 to 5.1. And that includes a huge chunk of PRs that are just agents changing a line or two in a config. It&amp;#39;s all magical thinking&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/issues/30719&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bun Rust rewrite: &amp;quot;codebase fails basic miri checks, allows for UB in safe rust&amp;quot;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48150900&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;481 points · 341 comments · by ndiddy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A GitHub issue reports that Bun&amp;#39;s Rust rewrite contains widespread undefined behavior and fails basic Miri checks due to improper memory management and lifetime erasure. Developers attributed the flaws to a 1:1 translation from Zig and AI-generated code, leading to multiple pull requests to fix the unsoundness. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/issues/30719&quot; title=&quot;Title: all of rust codebase: This codebase fails even the most basic miri checks, allows for UB in safe rust    URL Source: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/issues/30719    Published Time: 2026-05-14T17:53:42.000Z    Markdown Content:  # all of rust codebase: This codebase fails even the most basic miri checks, allows for UB in safe rust · Issue #30719 · oven-sh/bun    [Skip to content](https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/issues/30719#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Bun rewrite into Rust has sparked criticism regarding its heavy reliance on AI-generated code and &amp;#34;unaudited&amp;#34; unsafe blocks, which critics argue results in a codebase less trustworthy than the original Zig version &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152154&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; a big, flashy announcement (here: bun was re-written in memory-safe rust in a couple weeks) Did they even claim it was &amp;#39;memory-safe&amp;#39;? Every discussion of this topic has had dozens of comments noting that their vibed codebase is bursting at the seams with unaudited unsafe blocks, lightly reviewed by people who seem to not only seem to not understand Rust, but who seem incensed at the idea of needing to understand any programming language in the first place.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152347&quot; title=&quot;What I don&amp;#39;t understand is if they were going to translate Zig to unsafe Rust, why not just build a translation tool for it? You could do a one-to-one mapping of language constructs, hardcoding patterns in your codebase, and as one friend put it &amp;#39;Tbh they could&amp;#39;ve just hooked up zig translate-c to c2rust&amp;#39;. They would get deterministic translation, would probably have not been a heavy investment to build, and the output would have the same assurances as the input. In this case, I would trust the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152289&quot; title=&quot;So Bun saga has been &amp;#39;Zig, let me Ai you&amp;#39; &amp;#39;no&amp;#39; *Ai&amp;#39;s Zig fork, suffers from memory bugs* &amp;#39;Well I&amp;#39;m moving!&amp;#39; *Ai&amp;#39;s code into Rust, suffers from memory bugs*&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view the move as a marketing stunt that exploits the &amp;#34;memory-safe&amp;#34; reputation of Rust despite persistent undefined behavior &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48151995&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s a book that changed a lot of the way I think about attention and media [0]. The book isn&amp;#39;t very good, but it flags something relevant here. There is a huge asymmetry between the reach of a big, flashy announcement (here: bun was re-written in memory-safe rust in a couple weeks), and the relatively small reach of a correction (often just a footnote on an old article, here a GH issue). This asymmetry is well understood by marketing and PR professionals, and actively exploited. [0]…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152135&quot; title=&quot;This Bun rewrite feels like a potential Mythos marketing stunt.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152224&quot; title=&quot;The author kept bragging about classes of bugs that would not happen with Rust.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152146&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;unsafe&amp;#39; is a promise to the compiler that you&amp;#39;re going to ensure invariants that the compiler can&amp;#39;t check. Rust only promises to eliminate UB if the invariants are held. You can still get UB by violating that promise, as this bug demonstrates.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others defend it as a necessary first step toward long-term safety, especially given the project&amp;#39;s friction with the Zig community &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152388&quot; title=&quot;A bug-for-bug port to Rust is the first step to fixing that. Assuming the port is actually 1:1 without any behavioral changes, these bugs already exist in the Zig code. The difference is now it&amp;#39;s known where effort can be dedicated in order to one day have a memory-safe release of Bun. People have absolutely lost their mind over this and completely forgotten the benefits Rust gives you. I feel like I&amp;#39;ve gone back 10 years reading threads about the Rust port of Bun these are the exact same…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152336&quot; title=&quot;Sure. I&amp;#39;m completely unaffiliated and think Zig&amp;#39;s AI stance is ridiculous &amp;amp; politically-motivated and a port is absolutely justified if they will not budge. Apparently I am deeply in the minority.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The core technical dispute centers on whether a &amp;#34;vibe-coded&amp;#34; port that fails basic safety checks provides any of the actual benefits typically associated with the Rust language &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152154&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; a big, flashy announcement (here: bun was re-written in memory-safe rust in a couple weeks) Did they even claim it was &amp;#39;memory-safe&amp;#39;? Every discussion of this topic has had dozens of comments noting that their vibed codebase is bursting at the seams with unaudited unsafe blocks, lightly reviewed by people who seem to not only seem to not understand Rust, but who seem incensed at the idea of needing to understand any programming language in the first place.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152347&quot; title=&quot;What I don&amp;#39;t understand is if they were going to translate Zig to unsafe Rust, why not just build a translation tool for it? You could do a one-to-one mapping of language constructs, hardcoding patterns in your codebase, and as one friend put it &amp;#39;Tbh they could&amp;#39;ve just hooked up zig translate-c to c2rust&amp;#39;. They would get deterministic translation, would probably have not been a heavy investment to build, and the output would have the same assurances as the input. In this case, I would trust the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://projectzero.google/2026/05/pixel-10-exploit.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A 0-click exploit chain for the Pixel 10&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (projectzero.google)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148460&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;445 points · 237 comments · by happyhardcore&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google Project Zero researchers developed a two-stage, zero-click exploit chain for the Pixel 10 by leveraging a patched Dolby vulnerability and a new, &amp;#34;exceptionally simple&amp;#34; memory mapping flaw in the Tensor G5&amp;#39;s VPU driver that granted full kernel read-write access. &lt;a href=&quot;https://projectzero.google/2026/05/pixel-10-exploit.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: A 0-click exploit chain for the Pixel 10: When a Door Closes, a Window Opens    URL Source: https://projectzero.google/2026/05/pixel-10-exploit.html    Markdown Content:  # A 0-click exploit chain for the Pixel 10: When a Door Closes, a Window Opens - Project Zero    [Project Zero](https://projectzero.google/)    * * *    - [x]   *   [blog archive](https://projectzero.google/archive.html)  *   [bug reports](https://project-zero.issues.chromium.org/savedsearches/7162405)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discovery of a 0-click exploit chain has sparked debate over the security risks introduced by AI-powered messaging features, which increase the attack surface by decoding media before a user even opens a message &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48150716&quot; title=&quot;I followed the link to the Pixel 9 bug/exploit and saw this: &amp;#39;Over the past few years, several AI-powered features have been added to mobile phones that allow users to better search and understand their messages. One effect of this change is increased 0-click attack surface, as efficient analysis often requires message media to be decoded before the message is opened by the user&amp;#39; Haven&amp;#39;t we learned our lesson on this?  Don&amp;#39;t read and act on my sms messages without me asking you to!&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152270&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Haven&amp;#39;t we learned our lesson on this? What is the purported lesson we should have learned? Users choose phones with rich messaging features. This was a major selling point for iPhone, first, with iMessage, and later with Android until iOS caught up with RCS.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue for extreme legal consequences for developers of &amp;#34;catastrophic code,&amp;#34; others point out that modern LLMs are already capable of identifying such vulnerabilities through first-principles analysis &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48149102&quot; title=&quot;Hmmm... I&amp;#39;d like someone to double check my thinking here. I posted this exact prompt for gpt 5.5 xhigh: ``` does this look right to you? don&amp;#39;t do any searches or check memory, just think through first principles static int vpu_mmap(struct file fp, struct vm_area_struct vm) { unsigned long pfn; struct vpu_core core = container_of(fp-&amp;gt;f_inode-&amp;gt;i_cdev, struct vpu_core, cdev); vm_flags_set(vm, VM_IO | VM_DONTEXPAND | VM_DONTDUMP); / This is a CSRs mapping, use pgprot_device */ vm-&amp;gt;vm_page_prot =…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48149306&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s the usual problem of having no consequences for the person who wrote catastrophic code like this and the company who released it. If the person who wrote this were to be imprisoned for the rest of their life, for instance, or if the company were to be fined $1 million per user put at risk (which would probably mean a $1-10 trillion fine for Google -enough to trigger bankruptcy), then things would be very different&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48149490&quot; title=&quot;If this rule were implemented, would you be walking free right now? Think it over.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a notable contrast in vendor responsiveness; while Google patched this driver bug within 90 days, anecdotal reports suggest Apple can take up to six months to resolve similar issues &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48149104&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;This is notably fast given that this is the first time that an Android driver bug I reported was patched within 90 days of the vendor first learning about the vulnerability.&amp;#39; This makes me feel better about Google, but also makes me kind of frightened of the rest of Android.  I wonder what Apple&amp;#39;s response time is?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48149408&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve reported security bugs to Apple before. Was a couple years back but I remember it taking around 6 months to patch (there was a couple back and forth for me to get a more reliable POC). Maybe 2 months from when I submitted a POC with 100% reproducibility&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://explorer.samismith.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Explore Wikipedia Like a Windows XP Desktop&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (explorer.samismith.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48146129&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;533 points · 121 comments · by smusamashah&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Wikipedia File Explorer is an interactive web project that allows users to browse Wikipedia categories and Wikimedia Commons media through a functional interface modeled after the Windows XP desktop. &lt;a href=&quot;https://explorer.samismith.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Wikipedia File Explorer — Browse Wikipedia on a Windows XP desktop    URL Source: https://explorer.samismith.com/    Markdown Content:  # Wikipedia File Explorer — Browse Wikipedia on a Windows XP desktop    Wikipedia Media Geofile Explorer Readme.txt    Media Viewer    Loading…    —    [Open on Commons ↗](https://explorer.samismith.com/#)    Readme.txt -…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users praised the project for its aesthetic appeal and its ability to map Wikipedia&amp;#39;s vast data to a familiar, object-oriented mental model &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147079&quot; title=&quot;Incredibly beautiful, possibly because it maps so well to the mental model we typically use to organize knowledge in our heads. I don&amp;#39;t know how we lost the folder/container vs. document/content iconography, and other things (like layout of items, sorting) during the shift to web applications.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147308&quot; title=&quot;This is really impressive. It&amp;#39;s exactly what I imagined the original Microsoft Network in Windows 95 would have been like. And so The Microsoft Network wasn&amp;#39;t a program you loaded like CompuServe. It was part of the OS, with folder icons that looked just like real folders. It was a kind of version of the Web where you could browse online data the same way you browsed your file system. This is what made it cool. It was as if the data was suddenly free of the shackles of being displayed in a…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that knowledge is too subjective and non-linear for rigid hierarchies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147311&quot; title=&quot;Knowledge doesn’t neatly align to a nested hierarchy. Especially written knowledge. Language is an imperfect means to convey knowledge, and people store that knowledge in subjective and highly personal ways. You may mentally recall balloons within “entertainment” or “party”, whereas I might store that knowledge under “horror”. Add onto that the massive focus on using graph theory to scale social networking technologically, and you effectively lose any motivation for rigid hierarchy.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest that &amp;#34;symlinks&amp;#34; or multi-tagging systems could bridge the gap between structured folders and fluid data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147439&quot; title=&quot;A folder system doesn&amp;#39;t have to be strictly rigid, you can still have &amp;#39;symlinks&amp;#39; so the same article appearing in different folders (aka labels if you can easily duplicate content inside folders, but you retain the nested, drill-down approach)&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148082&quot; title=&quot;Wikimedia Commons has this feature. Editors can manually bless certain combinations of traits as &amp;#39;subcategories&amp;#39;. For example, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Paintings_of_cas... contains the subcategories &amp;#39;Paintings of castles by country&amp;#39; (nested hierarchy), &amp;#39;Frescos of castles&amp;#39; (a medium), &amp;#39;Paintings of Château de Chillon&amp;#39; (a subject), and &amp;#39;Young Knight in a Landscape by Carpaccio&amp;#39; (multiple views onto a specific item). Each item may appear in multiple subcategories. As far as I…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite some minor confusion over Wikipedia&amp;#39;s redirect logic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48146631&quot; title=&quot;It is nice. I randomly click on something interest just appear in my mind and lead to this: life -&amp;gt; death -&amp;gt; last_words -&amp;gt; More milk. But I can&amp;#39;t find it on Wiki. I search More milk. and the first result is this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Michael_Jackson . Hmm, why is the name different?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48146678&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;More milk&amp;#39; is a redirect to that page https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=More_milk.&amp;amp;redire... The &amp;#39;Windows XP&amp;#39; website displays the same article when you click on &amp;#39;More milk&amp;#39; there&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48146719&quot; title=&quot;Wow, do you know what is the relationship between More milk and the death of MJ?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt; and the &amp;#34;Temu-like&amp;#34; visual style &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48146733&quot; title=&quot;Is there a reason why it looks like Temu&amp;#39;s Windows XP? Copyright concerns I guess?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, the interface was lauded for its speed and for revealing the depth of Wikipedia&amp;#39;s existing classification systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147308&quot; title=&quot;This is really impressive. It&amp;#39;s exactly what I imagined the original Microsoft Network in Windows 95 would have been like. And so The Microsoft Network wasn&amp;#39;t a program you loaded like CompuServe. It was part of the OS, with folder icons that looked just like real folders. It was a kind of version of the Web where you could browse online data the same way you browsed your file system. This is what made it cool. It was as if the data was suddenly free of the shackles of being displayed in a…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48146597&quot; title=&quot;love how it loads instantly and feels smooth. imo useless but still cool&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://turso.tech/blog/the-wonders-of-ai&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;We are retiring our bug bounty program&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (turso.tech)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148391&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;359 points · 285 comments · by tjek&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Turso is retiring its $1,000 bug bounty program after being overwhelmed by a surge of low-quality, AI-generated submissions that wasted maintainers&amp;#39; time with nonsensical or fraudulent claims of data corruption. &lt;a href=&quot;https://turso.tech/blog/the-wonders-of-ai&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Wonders of AI: We Are Retiring Our Bug Bounty Program    URL Source: https://turso.tech/blog/the-wonders-of-ai    Published Time: 2026-05-12    Markdown Content:  # The Wonders of AI: We Are Retiring Our Bug Bounty Program    Register now for early access to concurrent writes in the Turso Cloud.[Join the waitlist](https://turso.tech/private-beta)    [Turso](https://turso.tech/)    [Start for free now](https://app.turso.tech/signup)Open main menu    [Docs](https://docs.turso.tech/)[Cloud…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The decision to retire the bug bounty program highlights how AI-generated &amp;#34;low-effort bullshit&amp;#34; is overwhelming maintainers with an unmanageable volume of reports &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148662&quot; title=&quot;Oh look it&amp;#39;s more of exactly what AI skeptics said would happen: low effort bullshit generated at scale making life hell for people actually trying to make things. That&amp;#39;s wild. Edit: it is genuinely wild, I don&amp;#39;t know of another product category that selects so perfectly for the WORST type of person to be it&amp;#39;s enthusiast. Just every single person I see hyped about AI is fucking insufferable on at least one and usually multiple axis.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148878&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I think people would be more interested in listening to &amp;#39;AI skeptics&amp;#39; if they offered realistic solutions to the problems they predict. AI is the fucking problem. Yes, it has (some) uses. It is not nearly the number advertised. And more and more the median use case seems to be, again, overloading people actually trying to do work with an avalanche of bullshit. The solution is exactly what the linked article says: shut it down. The AI people have ruined another good thing that was both…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters compare this phenomenon to the &amp;#34;tactical tornado&amp;#34;—a prolific but destructive developer who prioritizes speed over code quality and long-term maintainability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148785&quot; title=&quot;Sounds a like a tactical tornado, made me think of this paragraph: “Almost every software development organization has at least one developer who takes tactical programming to the extreme: a tactical tornado. The tactical tornado is a prolific programmer who pumps out code far faster than others but works in a totally tactical fashion. When it comes to implementing a quick feature, nobody gets it done faster than the tactical tornado. In some organizations, management treats tactical tornadoes…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148883&quot; title=&quot;AI can be the ultimate tactical tornado.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest technical or social fixes like enforcing smaller PRs or charging submission fees &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148741&quot; title=&quot;Closing the program is totally reasonable. However, there is another option: Make submitters pay a nominal fee that is returned in the case that a real bug is found.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148991&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand why one wouldn&amp;#39;t just auto reject big PRs and tell them to make smaller ones. Sounds like it&amp;#39;s a communication and social problem, not a technological one. Even with AI, just tell it to make smaller self contained PRs. I do this with Claude or GPT models and they do just fine.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that the &amp;#34;Pandora’s box&amp;#34; of AI has fundamentally broken the incentive structures of open-source collaboration &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148812&quot; title=&quot;I think people would be more interested in listening to &amp;#39;AI skeptics&amp;#39; if they offered realistic solutions to the problems they predict. Pandora&amp;#39;s box has been opened, let&amp;#39;s deal with the consequences now instead of trying to shut the box which cannot be shut.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48149034&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The solution is exactly what the linked article says: shut it down. At this point it&amp;#39;s impossible, so I concur with the parent: forget about the shutting it down and think of something actually realistic.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/the-sigmoids-wont-save-you&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The sigmoids won&amp;#39;t save you&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (astralcodexten.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147021&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;303 points · 282 comments · by Tomte&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scott Alexander argues that while all exponential trends eventually become sigmoids, this fact does not predict an imminent slowdown in AI progress; instead, he suggests using Lindy’s Law as a default, which implies that current dramatic improvements are likely to continue for several more years. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/the-sigmoids-wont-save-you&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Sigmoids Won&amp;#39;t Save You    URL Source: https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/the-sigmoids-wont-save-you    Published Time: 2026-05-15T08:55:10+00:00    Markdown Content:  Astral Codex Ten  Subscribe  Sign in  The Sigmoids Won&amp;#39;t Save You  ...  MAY 15, 2026  473  443  32  Share    “All exponentials eventually become sigmoids” is an annoying AI talking point. If someone presents a graph like this…    ….and points out that it seems like AI capabilities could soon reach the level marked “High”, then the height of…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate centers on whether AI progress follows a &amp;#34;sigmoid&amp;#34; curve toward diminishing returns or a &amp;#34;Lindy&amp;#34; trend that suggests continued exponential growth &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48153567&quot; title=&quot;FYI: The author has predicted that &amp;#39;AGI&amp;#39; will be here in 1-2 years and has staked his public reputation on it. He is personally invested in trendlines being lindy rather than sigmoid. I don&amp;#39;t think you can use lindy on trends as if trends are static objects, but that&amp;#39;s another conversation.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48151209&quot; title=&quot;Lindy’s Law is an absolute gem, that I&amp;#39;m keeping. If we don&amp;#39;t understand the fundamental limits to any particular kind of trend, our default assumption should be that it will continue for about as long as it has gone on already. We can, in fact, easily put a confidence interval on this. With 90% odds we&amp;#39;re not in the first 5% of the trend, or the last 5% of the trend. Therefore it will probably go on between 1/19th longer, and 19 times longer. With a median of as long as it has gone on so far.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that current models lack the reasoning and internal world models necessary for AGI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48158858&quot; title=&quot;AI boosters really are detached from reality. LLMs are nothing close to AGI and not going to lead to it, they can’t distinguish right from wrong, they can’t count, they can’t reason, they generate plausible text from a vast databank of connected text. Apparently that is enough to fool many people but it’s nothing close to AGI which would require internal models of the world, reasoning etc. We are nowhere close to AGI and the fools who predicted we were will unfortunately keep lying about their…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that even a remote possibility of superintelligence necessitates taking fast-approaching timelines seriously &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48157175&quot; title=&quot;I think his agenda here is to point out that your probability distribution for AI outcomes should be broad (what you said), but most importantly: this means you must take seriously the possibility that we are gonna get superintelligence quite soon. Basically a lot of people say &amp;#39;but isn&amp;#39;t it also pretty likely that we DON&amp;#39;T get superintelligence?&amp;#39; And, yes, it is. But superintelligence being even a remotely plausible outcome is a big fucking deal. Your investment choices in that context are not…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics point out that these mathematical models are often used as &amp;#34;excuses&amp;#34; for personal biases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48155506&quot; title=&quot;I felt the better takeaway from this was that it&amp;#39;s impossible to know for certainty how long this will or will not continue regardless of the data or models you&amp;#39;re using, because if you (or anyone else) could predict that accurately they&amp;#39;d be one of the richest people on the planet. I don&amp;#39;t know when (or if) AI will implode or succeed with any degree of provable certainty, because that&amp;#39;s not my area of expertise.  Rather, I can point out and discuss flaws in the common booster and doomer…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, noting that specific predictions of AGI by 2027 are frequently hedged or adjusted as deadlines approach &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48153567&quot; title=&quot;FYI: The author has predicted that &amp;#39;AGI&amp;#39; will be here in 1-2 years and has staked his public reputation on it. He is personally invested in trendlines being lindy rather than sigmoid. I don&amp;#39;t think you can use lindy on trends as if trends are static objects, but that&amp;#39;s another conversation.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48156329&quot; title=&quot;So, this is not quite right: Alexander contributed to the report, but his personal opinion is more like the mid-2030s[1]. Freddie feels like this is him backing down from the original statement, but in fact he said this at the time the report was published, and in fact pointed out a graf below the quote that Freddie claims does tie him to 2027: &amp;gt; Do we really think things will move this fast? Sort of no - between the beginning of the project last summer and the present, Daniel’s median for the…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/baseballot/status/2055309076209492208&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ABC News has taken all FiveThirtyEight articles offline&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152553&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;385 points · 167 comments · by cmsparks&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ABC News has removed all FiveThirtyEight articles from the internet, redirecting the site&amp;#39;s former URLs to the ABC News politics section. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/baseballot/status/2055309076209492208&quot; title=&quot;Title: Nathaniel Rakich on X: &amp;#39;ABC News has now taken all FiveThirtyEight articles completely offline. They now redirect to abcnews dot com/politics. A needless erasure of thousands of pages of knowledge.&amp;#39; / X    URL Source: https://twitter.com/baseballot/status/2055309076209492208    Published Time: Sat, 16 May 2026 05:20:48 GMT    Markdown Content:  Don’t miss what’s happening    People on X are the first to know.    [Log in](https://x.com/login)    [Sign up](https://x.com/i/flow/signup)    ##…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The removal of FiveThirtyEight’s archives is widely viewed as a &amp;#34;petty&amp;#34; move by ABC/Disney, especially following Nate Silver’s claim that the network refused to sell him the IP because he criticized their management &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48153035&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; BTW, I approached ABC about buying back the former FiveThirtyEight IP*, and they said they wouldn&amp;#39;t sell at any price because I&amp;#39;d criticized their management of the brand. --Nate Silver (538 founder) ABC seem pretty petty here.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48153065&quot; title=&quot;Wow. I have a low opinion of ABC as I said in another post, but this level of pettiness is still surprising to me.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48153110&quot; title=&quot;It’s basically a fuck you to the shareholders. Hey we’ve got this dead asset someone will pay for but we won’t sell because they were mean to us. Any exec who operates that way should be shown the door ASAP as they are likely doing similar emotional management of other aspects of the business.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that Silver bears responsibility for &amp;#34;selling out&amp;#34; a once-reliable brand &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48155403&quot; title=&quot;So Nate &amp;amp; Co sell out to a big corporation then are upset that it does big corporation stuff? I&amp;#39;m more mad at Nate here because 538 was my go-to for political coverage pre-sellout, and because of his greed it went away.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that ABC&amp;#39;s decision to &amp;#34;fritter away&amp;#34; a recognizable asset is a baffling failure of corporate stewardship &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48153049&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s wild to me how often I see corporate America both:  1. Spend immense amounts trying to build and improve a brand.  2. Toss well known brands aside as if they are useless. Not that it&amp;#39;s always the same company doing both at the same time, but it&amp;#39;s crazy 538 was just left to die. It was a very recognizable brand among wonky professionals, a very desirable customer base. It&amp;#39;s not as if politics and sports have gotten less relevant in the world over the past decade. ABC&amp;#39;s decision to toss this…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also debate regarding the brand&amp;#39;s legacy, with some citing a &amp;#34;credibility hit&amp;#34; from the 2016 election &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48153767&quot; title=&quot;Was 538 ABC&amp;#39;s property during the first Trump election? IIRC they took a pretty big credibility hit after getting that election so wrong and never really recovered.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, while defenders note that Silver’s model was actually more accurate than most competitors at the time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48153012&quot; title=&quot;The 70:30 prediction against Trump was far better than most. I did see models back then that considered the state polls mostly or entirely uncorrelated, and those produced obviously garbage with 90% or even 99% in favor of Clinton. But in the end people pick on Nate because he really enjoys being an asshole on the internet. It&amp;#39;s far more about when he acts as a pundit, not as an expert on statistics.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://analytics.fixelsmith.com/posts/sql-fraud-patterns/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SQL patterns I use to catch transaction fraud&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (analytics.fixelsmith.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48155212&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;319 points · 130 comments · by redbell&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This guide outlines six essential SQL patterns for detecting transaction fraud, including monitoring velocity, identifying &amp;#34;impossible travel&amp;#34; between locations, and spotting suspicious amount anomalies. It emphasizes using window functions to create composable signals that help analysts quickly identify high-risk activity like card testing and merchant skimming. &lt;a href=&quot;https://analytics.fixelsmith.com/posts/sql-fraud-patterns/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Six SQL patterns I use to catch transaction fraud    URL Source: https://analytics.fixelsmith.com/posts/sql-fraud-patterns/    Markdown Content:  May 12, 2026   **Quick disclaimer:** I do data work on a program-integrity team. Examples below use generic transaction tables and made-up scenarios. Nothing here comes from anything I’ve actually worked on or seen. Views are mine, not my employer’s.    * * *    Fraud detection in transaction data is mostly SQL. Not machine learning, not graph databases,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion is dominated by skepticism regarding the article&amp;#39;s authenticity, with users identifying the author as a likely AI-generated persona and the content as speculative or &amp;#34;generated from whole cloth&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48158424&quot; title=&quot;Hacker News, we need to talk! &amp;#39;Fixel Smith&amp;#39; is an AI-generated person, with an article that has very little to do with fraud analysis. &amp;#39;This&amp;#39; is also a music artist (1), novelist (2), fraud analyst (3), influencer (4), and whatever else you can imagine. 220+ points and 70 comments, and very few notice it&amp;#39;s quite a fake post — and no one that it&amp;#39;s an AI generated person? 1. https://www.amazon.it/Forged-Soundtrack-Explicit-Fixel-Smith... 2. https://fixelsmith.com 3.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48156936&quot; title=&quot;This seems interesting, but has so many signs of AI writing that I worry it&amp;#39;s not just edited but generated from whole cloth. Probably still a lot of truth in there but it does give me pause! &amp;gt; The roundness is the signal. &amp;gt; Slight pain, same result. to point at a few.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters argue that the proposed SQL patterns, such as flagging round-number transactions, are deeply flawed because round prices are common in many regions, at gas stations, or through &amp;#34;round up to donate&amp;#34; features &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48156815&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Real cardholders almost never buy something for exactly $1.00. Coffee is $4.73, gas is $52.81. The roundness is the signal. Surely this depends on how the vendor sets their prices? If you&amp;#39;re going to buy something from a website to test a stolen credit card you don&amp;#39;t just get to make up your own prices. And I think you may be over-indexing on the US &amp;#39;prices don&amp;#39;t include tax&amp;#39; thing. Elsewhere, round-number prices are extremely common. In fact a lot of the rest of the stuff in the post seems…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48157115&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m seeing a few stores here and there which have a &amp;#39;round up to donate&amp;#39; option.  I guess I&amp;#39;m a bit of a sucker and I always use that option.  My groceries are always a round number as a result.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48156938&quot; title=&quot;Worse than that. Coffee usually _is_ a round number in my experience, and I know of people who aim for round numbers when filling their car, and of fuel stations which require a pre-set value, often 10, 20, 50€ etc&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, critics suggest that manual SQL rules are inferior to machine learning models that can discover complex fraud patterns directly from data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48157580&quot; title=&quot;Isn&amp;#39;t the point of ML that you learn these rules from the data? The right approach to me would be to use ML models to detect patterns that correspond with fraud and then evaluate them to see if any make sense. This way you might discover new hyptotheses.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://writing.antonleicht.me/p/cut-off&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Access to frontier AI will soon be limited by economic and security constraints&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (writing.antonleicht.me)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48143284&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;209 points · 214 comments · by thoughtpeddler&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Frontier AI access is increasingly restricted by security concerns, high computational costs, and U.S. government interests, creating a &amp;#34;geopolitical rift&amp;#34; between nations with early access to top-tier models and those limited to older or restricted versions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://writing.antonleicht.me/p/cut-off&quot; title=&quot;Title: Cut Off    URL Source: https://writing.antonleicht.me/p/cut-off    Published Time: 2026-05-13T13:10:49+00:00    Markdown Content:  There’s a common mantra in the outskirts of AI policy thought: driven by market pressures and overheated capital markets, AI tokens will soon be abundant—and the future belongs to those who can use them best. The further you get away from San Francisco, the louder this mantra grows. It reaches a fever pitch in the peripheries, the many middle powers of the world…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely argue that the &amp;#34;technological genie is out of the bottle,&amp;#34; as open-weight models from China and Meta are rapidly closing the gap with US frontier labs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144692&quot; title=&quot;I am no-where near as concerned by this as I was a year ago, when I was expecting the axe to fall at any moment before the Chinese labs achieved some sort of escape velocity. I now think it&amp;#39;s too late, all the cats are out of all the bags, there&amp;#39;s no moat except maybe a temporal one of a few months, the genie is out of the bottle. There is no secret sauce the US labs have that the Chinese ones don&amp;#39;t, or won&amp;#39;t have soon enough. Deepseek 4 and Kimi 2.5 are not quite Claude 4.5/GPT5.5 but there&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144556&quot; title=&quot;No mention of open weights anywhere in the piece, which is weird. Qwen, Llama, DeepSeek are months behind frontier, not years. If you&amp;#39;re a European startup worried about getting cut off from Anthropic&amp;#39;s API in 2027, the real question is what the open-weight frontier looks like then. Probably pretty capable. That undercuts most of the doom scenario. Also, he concedes Mythos-level capabilities will be cheap next year, then handwaves it with &amp;#39;you need the best AI, not good-enough AI.&amp;#39; For most use…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some maintain that the highest-tier models still hold a significant lead in complex reasoning and specialized benchmarks like Arc-AGI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144829&quot; title=&quot;I wish it was true. I would gladly use a GPT 5.2 high model equivalent for coding (6 months old) if it was offered cheaper by Deepseek or Kimi. And I&amp;#39;m sure that&amp;#39;s an extremely prevalent opinion by the millions of Claude and Codex users who are bothered by the costs. However, they just don&amp;#39;t perform that well in practice. That&amp;#39;s the real issue. You can actually see it when you move away from open benchmarks. Deep seek 3.2 is  4% on Arc-AGI 2 [1], while GPT 5.2 high is 52% and GPT 5.5 pro high…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that &amp;#34;good enough&amp;#34; models at a fraction of the cost will satisfy most users and undercut economic moats &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144556&quot; title=&quot;No mention of open weights anywhere in the piece, which is weird. Qwen, Llama, DeepSeek are months behind frontier, not years. If you&amp;#39;re a European startup worried about getting cut off from Anthropic&amp;#39;s API in 2027, the real question is what the open-weight frontier looks like then. Probably pretty capable. That undercuts most of the doom scenario. Also, he concedes Mythos-level capabilities will be cheap next year, then handwaves it with &amp;#39;you need the best AI, not good-enough AI.&amp;#39; For most use…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144816&quot; title=&quot;Virtually no one is going to pay for the best performing lamp if the next best lamp does 90% as good for an order of magnitude cheaper. I will say, as pointed out by others, DeepSeek and other Chinese providers still lack a bit in the tooling that Claude has, but they&amp;#39;ll get there.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, significant concerns remain regarding the physical bottlenecks of hardware, specifically the high cost of GPUs and RAM required to run frontier-level capabilities locally or at scale &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144703&quot; title=&quot;Affordability of hardware that can run local LLMs is a real factor, too. Not sure when RAM prices are going down, but with everything that’s happening and can happen in the world right now, it doesn’t look like it’ll drop in the near or medium-term&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48145685&quot; title=&quot;What about access to GPUs and memory? This is becoming a pretty major bottleneck.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144723&quot; title=&quot;No one is going to run models that are comparable to frontier locally without spending enormous sums for use at scale or in large orgs. Even with cheap RAM, you will still need a very large budget for frontier-level capability. Open models that are competitive with frontier will be used on shared hosts.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.fastcompany.com/91542655/bitwarden-scrubs-always-free-and-inclusion-values-from-its-website-as-longtime-execs-step-down&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bitwarden scrubs &amp;#39;Always free&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;Inclusion&amp;#39; values from its site&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (fastcompany.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147637&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;265 points · 140 comments · by gpi&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bitwarden has removed &amp;#34;Always free&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;Inclusion&amp;#34; branding from its website following a leadership shakeup that saw its CEO and CFO replaced by executives with experience in mergers and acquisitions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.fastcompany.com/91542655/bitwarden-scrubs-always-free-and-inclusion-values-from-its-website-as-longtime-execs-step-down&quot; title=&quot;Title: Bitwarden scrubs ‘Always free’ and ‘Inclusion’ values from its website as longtime execs step down    URL Source: https://www.fastcompany.com/91542655/bitwarden-scrubs-always-free-and-inclusion-values-from-its-website-as-longtime-execs-step-down    Published Time: 2026-05-15T10:06:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Bitwarden scrubs &amp;#39;Always free&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;Inclusion&amp;#39; values from its website as longtime execs step down - Fast Company    ![Image 3: Hamburger menu…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The removal of &amp;#34;Always free&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;Inclusion&amp;#34; values from Bitwarden’s site, combined with a quiet change in leadership, has led users to speculate that the company is being prepped for a sale or acquisition &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148318&quot; title=&quot;Actually, the part of the article that made me prick my ears up was this paragraph: In February, longtime CEO Michael Crandell moved to an advisory role, according to LinkedIn, with no announcement from the company. His replacement, Michael Sullivan, former CEO of both Acquia and Insightsoftware, touts his experience with “all facets of mergers and acquisitions” on his own LinkedIn page, including experience working with leading private equity firms. In combination with downplaying the free…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While Bitwarden remains open-source, commenters argue that even OSS projects can experience &amp;#34;rugpulls&amp;#34; where hosted tiers are restricted, leaving non-technical users who cannot self-host in a difficult position &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148254&quot; title=&quot;I stopped endorsing closed-source software to friends and family years ago, because you can&amp;#39;t trust the companies behind them not to quietly change directions. Years ago I used a free workout app that I really liked. After a few months of using it I recommended it to friends. I only much later found out that I was on a grandfathered version of the free plan without ads or restrictions. The company had made changes to the free plan since I joined, and all new accounts (like my friends) were…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148321&quot; title=&quot;Bitwarden is open-source though? This is about the hosted version of it, which has a free tier. But you can run the same software on your server at home if you want, for free. (That said, I am also concerned about the direction Bitwarden is taking. I just think this shows that even OSS projects can have direction/rugpull issues.)&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148359&quot; title=&quot;You&amp;#39;re right, though the friends and family that I would feel the need to recommend a password manager to aren&amp;#39;t the type that would self-host their own servers.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest switching to alternatives like Vaultwarden or KeePass, others warn that a new owner could potentially block third-party client compatibility or restrict the software&amp;#39;s future direction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148515&quot; title=&quot;Except that we do have Vaultwarden, so those who haven&amp;#39;t already switched still have an option.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148611&quot; title=&quot;Vaultwarden relies on the goodwill of Bitwarden to allow it to use its clients for compatibility. I would wager a new owner looking for money would block that pretty soon after buying the company.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148319&quot; title=&quot;Ah, good old rugpull. Just use KeePass.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://claude.com/blog/how-claude-code-works-in-large-codebases-best-practices-and-where-to-start&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How Claude Code works in large codebases&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (claude.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144494&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;241 points · 158 comments · by shenli3514&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Claude Code optimizes large-scale development by using agentic search on live codebases rather than static indexes, utilizing a &amp;#34;harness&amp;#34; of CLAUDE.md files, hooks, and plugins to provide context and specialized skills while maintaining symbol-level navigation through Language Server Protocol (LSP) integrations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://claude.com/blog/how-claude-code-works-in-large-codebases-best-practices-and-where-to-start&quot; title=&quot;Title: How Claude Code works in large codebases: Best practices and where to start    URL Source: https://claude.com/blog/how-claude-code-works-in-large-codebases-best-practices-and-where-to-start    Published Time: May 14, 2026    Markdown Content:  Claude Code is running in production across multi-million-line monorepos, decades-old legacy systems, distributed architectures spanning dozens of repositories, and at organizations with thousands of developers. These environments present challenges that…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the efficacy of &amp;#34;agentic search&amp;#34; in Claude Code, with some users questioning why it avoids traditional indexing/LSPs that human engineers rely on for speed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144871&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Claude Code navigates a codebase the way a software engineer would: it traverses the file system, reads files, uses grep to find exactly what it needs, and follows references across the codebase. It operates locally on the developer’s machine and doesn’t require a codebase index to be built, maintained, or uploaded to a server.... &amp;gt; Agentic search avoids those failure modes. There&amp;#39;s no embedding pipeline or centralized index to maintain as thousands of engineers commit new code. Each…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that AI has already automated the majority of coding tasks in startups &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48145149&quot; title=&quot;This is already the case for many startups. In fact, the figure might be closer to 100%. The work shifts to requirements analysis, high-level specifications, and final review instead (after AI code review).&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others remain skeptical of bold industry claims regarding AI productivity and accountability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144586&quot; title=&quot;How very interesting. In an industry, where things shift around in months if not weeks, there’s been not only enough time for clear patterns to emerge but also these patterns have proven successful on large codebases. What’s the success criteria? Didn’t delete production database? Team velocity has increased? Codebase TTL has increased? Operations guys are happier?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48145124&quot; title=&quot;A lot of words about nothing. Meanwhile we are still waiting for these statements to come true: https://eu.36kr.com/en/p/3648851352018565 https://www.businessinsider.com/anthropic-ceo-ai-90-percent-... https://www.reddit.com/r/Anthropic/comments/1nemhxb/futurism... https://medium.com/@coders.stop/dario-amodei-said-90-of-code... https://www.youtube.com/shorts/0j1HqEEDThc Accountability, anyone?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant debate also emerged regarding security: while some view AI-driven database deletion as a failure of organizational permissions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144592&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Didn’t delete production database? I still say if this happens to you with AI tooling, that&amp;#39;s both a failure on you and your org for giving a developer prod credentials that could nuke production resources. I don&amp;#39;t think I&amp;#39;ve worked in a place that gave me this level of blind access.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144879&quot; title=&quot;But the correct way to do it is to have a separate account with more privileges, and only give AI access to your standard developer account&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others note that high-privilege access is common in early-stage startup environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144835&quot; title=&quot;I have only worked in startups and I have been an early engineer in both of them. I would always get high privileges within a short time where I would have the access to create and delete resources. I don&amp;#39;t think it&amp;#39;s that uncommon.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.zulip.com/2026/05/15/announcing-zulip-foundation/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Zulip Foundation&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.zulip.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152168&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;309 points · 80 comments · by boramalper&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Zulip founder Tim Abbott is stepping down to join Anthropic and donating the company to the newly formed, nonprofit Zulip Foundation to ensure the open-source chat platform&amp;#39;s long-term independence, stability, and commitment to its core values. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.zulip.com/2026/05/15/announcing-zulip-foundation/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Announcing the Zulip Foundation    URL Source: https://blog.zulip.com/2026/05/15/announcing-zulip-foundation/    Markdown Content:  # Announcing the Zulip Foundation    [![Image 1: Zulip](https://blog.zulip.com/_astro/zulip-logo.BWWbWTcB.svg)](https://blog.zulip.com/2026/05/15/announcing-zulip-foundation/)    *   [Zulip homepage](https://zulip.com/)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The transition of Zulip’s leadership to a non-profit foundation as the team joins Anthropic has sparked debate over the &amp;#34;brain drain&amp;#34; of open-source talent into AI labs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48153374&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Over the last few months, I’ve been reflecting deeply on the myriad ways in which AI is changing the world, and how it might change the world in the future. And I came to the conclusion that it’s vitally important that we navigate this strange adolescence of technology well, and that I should contribute to this cause more directly than I ever could as the CEO of Kandra Labs. The compensation for a senior developer at Anthropic is also certainly much better than a FOSS nonprofit - I&amp;#39;m sure…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48153633&quot; title=&quot;Gotta love the frontier labs annihilating open source projects left and right either by acquiring them directly or stealing the teams.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some critics view the move as a cynical departure for higher compensation, others defend the developers&amp;#39; right to be paid and argue that the move is driven by a genuine desire to address AI&amp;#39;s societal impact &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48153431&quot; title=&quot;I worked in the FOSS space for roughly half a decade. Comments like this are easy to make and also add absolutely no value whatsoever. If you actually feel strongly about it, do the work yourself, no one is stopping you.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48153415&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve known Tim personally for over a decade. I&amp;#39;m certain that he&amp;#39;s not doing this because he wants more money.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48153734&quot; title=&quot;How dare OSS devs get paid.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Amidst the controversy, users praised Zulip’s unique threading model as superior to Slack or Discord, though some questioned the timing of the announcement &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48153647&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve only used Zulip when checking out the Lean Zulip a few years ago, and I thought it was an infinitely better interface than Discord for serious discussion, and also much easier for lurkers to find information. I wish more projects adopted it.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48153930&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve long thought that we need a name for what Zulip is other than &amp;#39;team chat.&amp;#39;  IMO it&amp;#39;s different qualitatively than slack/mattermost/discord/teams &amp;amp;c.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48153528&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I’m stepping back from full-time Zulip leadership to join Anthropic, alongside three senior team members, and we’re donating the company to a newly created, independent, nonprofit Zulip Foundation Not trying to be cynical … but announcing on a Friday afternoon is typically the operating mode for when you need to announce something that you do not want to get noticed. I can only speculate this weeks Bun/Rust news might have played into how this Zulip news is being handled. To be clear, excited…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tristandc.com/government/news-2026-05-11-airdrop.php&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Details of the Daring Airdrop at Tristan Da Cunha&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tristandc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144380&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;265 points · 102 comments · by kspacewalk2&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The UK military successfully executed a daring airdrop of medical supplies and personnel to Tristan da Cunha on May 9, 2026, to combat a hantavirus outbreak. Paratroopers and medics arrived via an RAF A400M to support the remote island&amp;#39;s overstretched hospital following a suspected case from a cruise ship. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tristandc.com/government/news-2026-05-11-airdrop.php&quot; title=&quot;Title: Details of the Daring Airdrop at Tristan da Cunha, 9th May 2026    URL Source: https://www.tristandc.com/government/news-2026-05-11-airdrop.php    Markdown Content:  # Tristan da Cunha Hantavirus Outbreak 2026: Details of the Daring Airdrop at Tristan da Cunha, 9th May 2026    ![Image 1: Search](https://www.tristandc.com/graphics/search.png)  *   [Home](https://www.tristandc.com/index.php &amp;#39;Home Page&amp;#39;)  *   [About Tristan▼](https://www.tristandc.com/tour.php &amp;#39;About Tristan da Cunha&amp;#39;)  *   [Visit…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide between those who view the high-stakes medical airdrop as a source of national pride and a valid use of military resources for life-saving purposes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48145153&quot; title=&quot;I think this is one of the few things as late that makes me feel genuinely proud to be British, because, beneath the hostility that feels so rife across our country recently, we’ve so many good people making things like this happen. Bravo.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48145549&quot; title=&quot;True, but this is military expenditure. So would you rather they spend this on an exercise or on actually saving people?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48145936&quot; title=&quot;The only reason military should exist is to perform such life-saving, not life-ending, missions...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, and critics who argue the expense would be better spent on domestic infrastructure like the NHS &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48145386&quot; title=&quot;It certainly involved a lot of skill and expense, but how many more lives could be saved if the same money had been spent on improved traffic safety or NHS in general?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48146026&quot; title=&quot;This is a classic. It occurs in two forms: Wow, logistics to are very expensive! We could spend that money better in the cities! Wow, logistics in is expensive! We could spend that money better in rural areas! I read about a new road tunnel in London last year, a ten-digit price tag for about 1km of road IIRC. I&amp;#39;m 100% sure some people suggested that that money could have been better spent in rural areas.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users question the geopolitical necessity of maintaining such remote, subsidized colonies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48146603&quot; title=&quot;We shouldn&amp;#39;t be wasting a penny on colonies, this isn&amp;#39;t the age of Napoleon anymore, get the English out of any country that isn&amp;#39;t England.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148121&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Are they self-sustaining? How do they pay for stuff the want to import Generally the modern day population of these types of islands are simply cover for the government to maintain political control of an area of ocean surrounding them. Same deal with the Falklands, Orkney/Shetland, etc. To that end their entire existence is more or less subsidised because of this.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, while others point out that the island was originally uninhabited and serves a strategic role in maritime control &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147227&quot; title=&quot;The one thing you seem to be missing in your anticolonialist tirades is the fact that Tristan was uninhabited. It’s not like native peoples were displaced by the British colonists, right?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48145915&quot; title=&quot;Yeah and helps demonstrate thst Tristan is strategically important&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also curiosity regarding the island&amp;#39;s economic self-sufficiency, which primarily relies on lobster exports and government subsidies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48146175&quot; title=&quot;Very nice story. One thing I often ask myself in these situations:  What do the inhabitants on these islands actually do? There are 259 of them in this case. Are they self-sustaining? How do they pay for stuff the want to import? Do they live off the cruise ships they supply? And do people generally stay there or do young people generally move to mainland? Edit: For economy, it looks like they live off exporting langustas.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148121&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Are they self-sustaining? How do they pay for stuff the want to import Generally the modern day population of these types of islands are simply cover for the government to maintain political control of an area of ocean surrounding them. Same deal with the Falklands, Orkney/Shetland, etc. To that end their entire existence is more or less subsidised because of this.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://spectrum.ieee.org/steve-jobs-next-computer&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Steve Jobs in Exile – New book on his years at NeXT Computer&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (spectrum.ieee.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48146908&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;200 points · 159 comments · by rbanffy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Geoffrey Cain’s new book, *Steve Jobs in Exile*, explores how Jobs’s 12 years leading NeXT Computer transformed him from an immature founder into a disciplined leader, creating the software foundation for Apple’s modern operating systems and future success. &lt;a href=&quot;https://spectrum.ieee.org/steve-jobs-next-computer&quot; title=&quot;How NeXT Turned Steve Jobs From Brash Founder to Disciplined Builder    A new book recalls forgotten lessons from his time at NeXT Computer    [IEEE.org](https://www.ieee.org/)[IEEE Xplore Digital Library](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/home.jsp)[IEEE Standards](https://standards.ieee.org/)[More Sites](https://www.ieee.org/sitemap.html)    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The acquisition of NeXT is widely viewed as the catalyst for Apple’s survival, effectively replacing the failing &amp;#34;classic&amp;#34; Mac OS with NeXT’s superior architecture and design &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147372&quot; title=&quot;In many ways modern Apple is largely Next. The Apple that was dying when he returned largely faded away. Folks forget that Apple was literally days away from simply going bust. One of the most amazing comeback stories in the history of business.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147271&quot; title=&quot;They are hardly forgotten considering the OS was a key influence of Mac OS X and you can see clear features of it today. It was hugely important in the mid 90&amp;#39;s graphics and 3d animation era too. Such a fabulous piece of design, both software and hardware.   I would much have prefered a world where Next and Mac OS never combined and we had both, as the Mac O7-9 were also a real treat to use.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147296&quot; title=&quot;NeXT would have died and Mac OS would have been replaced by something . All macOS is is just a different window manager (to borrow a Unix term). Windows and Linux probably be more dominant . macOS is a better system than classic macOS when you realize you still have access to the NeXT internals and even many applications in utilities are really GUIs on top of command line utilities and you can roll back many features by running a command that edits a XML file that really is just a large…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate the exact timeline of Apple&amp;#39;s near-collapse, there is consensus that Jobs&amp;#39; return brought a necessary strategic purge of bloated product lines and ineffective leadership &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147502&quot; title=&quot;Let&amp;#39;s not be overly dramatic about that period. Apple was not days away from going bust. They were months away from filing bankruptcy. They were still a multi-billion dollar company even then. They just had very bad supply chain management. A bunch of old Macs sitting in warehouses not selling and too many people on payroll without any clear objectives. As Steve put it, &amp;#39;the ship was sinking and Gil (D&amp;#39;Amelio) was worried about which direction we were pointing.&amp;#39; The Apple board had hired a…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147617&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s funny how many people Jobs had to fire during this period, but is still seen as a good guy to many in the tech community. Not that different from when Musk took over Twitter.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Commentators highlight that NeXT&amp;#39;s legacy persists through modern macOS internals and the work of key engineers who pioneered technologies like Objective-C and Interface Builder &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147538&quot; title=&quot;Presumably, the book goes into depth about the folks who actually did the work: - Susan Kare and Keith Ohlfs who did the UI design - Caroline Rose (Author of _Inside Macintosh_) who wrote the documentation - Avie Tevanian (the most heavily recruited CS student at that time w/ job offers from Apple, AT&amp;amp;T, IBM, and Microsoft) who wrote the Mach Micro kernel - Brad J. Cox (author of https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/1945013.Object_Orient... ) who created Objective-C - Jean-Marie Hullot who…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147296&quot; title=&quot;NeXT would have died and Mac OS would have been replaced by something . All macOS is is just a different window manager (to borrow a Unix term). Windows and Linux probably be more dominant . macOS is a better system than classic macOS when you realize you still have access to the NeXT internals and even many applications in utilities are really GUIs on top of command line utilities and you can roll back many features by running a command that edits a XML file that really is just a large…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite Jobs&amp;#39; reputation for brilliance and &amp;#34;sui generis&amp;#34; taste, some remain critical of his management style and Apple&amp;#39;s occasional disregard for ergonomic user feedback &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147617&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s funny how many people Jobs had to fire during this period, but is still seen as a good guy to many in the tech community. Not that different from when Musk took over Twitter.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152809&quot; title=&quot;cannot wait for this book. it is insane that steve jobs has somehow become underrated because the lesson has become “sometimes assholes are geniuses”… that is such a painfully reductive narrative it beggars belief. there is a reason he is in/on the pantheon, and to talk yourself out of it is to do yourself a disservice. it’s just that a lot of his skills are not transferable because you have to cultivate the kind of taste he spent his whole life acquiring. the only transferable skill is in…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147394&quot; title=&quot;Much respect to Steve and the engineers at Apple. However, I hate using a product from Apple that actually causes me physical pain after using it. The magic mouse. I use that for 10 minutes and my palm and wrist hurt badly. Many have experienced the same symptoms and yet Apple hasn’t changed its design. I get that Apple is creative. Do they change their product design based on feedback from actual users in their creative process?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://radicle.dev/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Radicle: Sovereign {code forge} built on Git&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (radicle.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147603&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;266 points · 90 comments · by KolmogorovComp&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Radicle is an open-source, peer-to-peer code collaboration stack built on Git that enables decentralized, censorship-resistant repository hosting without reliance on centralized third parties. &lt;a href=&quot;https://radicle.dev/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Radicle: the sovereign forge    URL Source: https://radicle.dev/    Markdown Content:  # Radicle: the sovereign forge  ![Image 1](https://radicle.dev/assets/images/ribbon.svg)  **Radicle** is a sovereign {code forge} built on Git.    [Get started ↓](https://radicle.dev/#get-started)[Run a seed…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Radicle is praised as a sovereign, decentralized alternative to GitHub that is particularly well-suited for agentic workflows and cryptographic identity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148412&quot; title=&quot;Radicle is really underrated, especially when working with agents. I find it a joy to use for my agentic workflows. If there&amp;#39;s purely an agentic forge one day, it&amp;#39;s likely going to be a distributed one, with cryptographic identities and signed artifacts by default.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147876&quot; title=&quot;The more I have been using git and building my own tooling and services around it for usage, I have figured out that something like radicle feels like the right/better solution, definitely better than what github is atm. There are rough edges and the seeding thing is a bit mehhh. And honestly there are a bunch of things I would do differently but I like the spirit of things. Not sure where the authors of the project stand, but it&amp;#39;s fun to see them make progress.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue the documentation fails to clearly define the project&amp;#39;s value proposition or distinguish its features from standard Git &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48149977&quot; title=&quot;I tried to understand what this does... &amp;gt; What is Radicle? How is it different from Git/GitHub? &amp;gt; Radicle is a peer-to-peer code collaboration platform (“forge”) built on Git. Unlike centralized platforms like GitHub, there is no single entity controlling the network or user data. Repositories are replicated across peers in a decentralized manner. Radicle is an alternative for people and organizations who want full control of their data and user experience, without compromising on the social…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While the team is currently redesigning the website and considers future support for other version control systems, users currently desire easier local-only deployments and more information regarding CI/PR capabilities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148504&quot; title=&quot;AD: The website is currently being redesigned, I suspect we&amp;#39;ll have it up in the next few weeks. No it doesn&amp;#39;t currently support other VCS&amp;#39;s but we have planned for that possibility in future!&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48149427&quot; title=&quot;VCS agnosticism would be a selling point.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148384&quot; title=&quot;How well does it hold up under load? What are the CI and PR stories?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48150357&quot; title=&quot;I wish they would make local-only deployment easier. For example, lets take 3 machines and try to setup Radicle to work only on those, without joining the common Radicle network. Like on-premises GitLab, but decentralized, without the need of the server. It requires quite some serious scripting and usecase not covered in the documentation.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-14</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-14</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arkadiyt.com/2026/05/13/removing-the-modem-and-gps-from-my-rav4/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Removing the modem and GPS from my 2024 RAV4 hybrid&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (arkadiyt.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138136&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1082 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 580 comments · by arkadiyt&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To protect his privacy from data brokers and manufacturers, a car owner physically removed the Data Communication Module and GPS antenna from his 2024 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid to permanently disable telemetry and remote tracking. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arkadiyt.com/2026/05/13/removing-the-modem-and-gps-from-my-rav4/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Removing the Modem and GPS from my 2024 RAV4 Hybrid    URL Source: https://arkadiyt.com/2026/05/13/removing-the-modem-and-gps-from-my-rav4/    Published Time: Fri, 15 May 2026 03:07:43 GMT    Markdown Content:  May 13th, 2026 | 14 minute read    Modern cars are computers on wheels - they have more sensors than you can count and are constantly phoning home with telemetry data like your location, speed, fuel levels, sudden accelerations/decelerations, video footage, driver attention data from eye…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are increasingly seeking hardware-level solutions to prevent vehicle telemetry, such as removing modems or specific fuses, though some note that manufacturers often ignore software bugs and low-quality hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138500&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Even after the modem is removed, if you connect your phone to the car via Bluetooth then the car will use your phone as an internet connection and send all the same telemetry data back to Toyota. However, if you use a wired USB connection then it does not do that (see the discussion here and elsewhere), so I exclusively use CarPlay via USB. The problem with this is that both carplay and android auto capture their own vehicle telemetry. So even though the car is not able to use your phone as a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139073&quot; title=&quot;The 2024 Ford Maverick has a single fuse for the telematics unit that you can remove without throwing a code or an error. No idea if this remained true after the 2025-2026 refresh, but worth knowing. https://www.mavericktruckclub.com/forum/threads/telematics-f...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48140310&quot; title=&quot;I have the same car and want to do this, but not for the reasons the author noted but because the GPS unit in the car is broken when paired with Carplay and has the wrong compass heading causing navigation to be completely useless. I have reported this to Toyota multiple times with videos detailing the problem and they have denied the problem and ultimately when faced with the evidence simply refused to fix it. I&amp;#39;ve been a big fan of Toyota&amp;#39;s Production System and their management culture, but…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant debate regarding whether cars can bypass a removed modem by using a connected phone&amp;#39;s data via Bluetooth or CarPlay, with some arguing this would require hotspot capabilities while others believe the local network established for screen mirroring allows for data transmission &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138500&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Even after the modem is removed, if you connect your phone to the car via Bluetooth then the car will use your phone as an internet connection and send all the same telemetry data back to Toyota. However, if you use a wired USB connection then it does not do that (see the discussion here and elsewhere), so I exclusively use CarPlay via USB. The problem with this is that both carplay and android auto capture their own vehicle telemetry. So even though the car is not able to use your phone as a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48140651&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Important: Even after the modem is removed, if you connect your phone to the car via Bluetooth then the car will use your phone as an internet connection and send all the same telemetry data back to Toyota. How is this the case? I thought bluetooth was just sharing my phone&amp;#39;s audio. Why would it allow requests over the internet? Surely there&amp;#39;s a way to tell the phone not to give its internet connection to any connected bluetooth device?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48140758&quot; title=&quot;When reading the article I think he appears to be talking about car play/android auto connection not audio only connections. I think Bluetooth in AA and Carplay is used to configure a local network between the phone and the car to transmit the images to the cars screen. I would assume that that data capability can also be used for the car to communicate with the Internet.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48140976&quot; title=&quot;It does produce a local Wi-Fi network but there&amp;#39;s no evidence that it supports internet communication. That would be considered a hotspot, which not all carriers even support.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these efforts, many commenters express a sense of futility, noting that privacy is further eroded by telecom tracking, credit card data, and the declining acceptance of cash &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139300&quot; title=&quot;And once you&amp;#39;ve gotten rid of Google and Apple, your telecom company tracks you, your CC payments help track you and even cameras in public do. It&amp;#39;s hard to not want to throw your hands in the air screaming &amp;#39;whatever&amp;#39; when almost everything you use in public is somehow used to track you either as you move around, or in the future.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48140033&quot; title=&quot;Exactly, and more and more places are removing cash as a payment option :(&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48140307&quot; title=&quot;Cash handling isn&amp;#39;t free, and for smaller businesses might actually end up being more expensive than accepting electronic payments.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48140352&quot; title=&quot;If your margins are so razor thin that the cost of handling cash is significant, you need to raise your prices. Cash is legal tender -- not accepting it for in-person transactions is really shitty (maybe shouldn&amp;#39;t be allowed?)&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/pull/30412&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rewrite Bun in Rust has been merged&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48132488&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;696 points · &lt;strong&gt;782 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by Chaoses&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/pull/30412&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bun is transitioning from Zig to Rust to eliminate memory safety bugs like use-after-free and double-free errors, though developers acknowledge that leaks and JS-boundary issues will persist &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48133519&quot; title=&quot;Still writing the blog post about this. Will share more details. For where this is coming from, skim the bugfixes in the Bun v1.3.14 and earlier release notes. Rust won’t catch all of these - leaks from holding references too long and anything that re-enters across the JS boundary are still on us. But a large % of that list is use-after-free, double-free, and forgot-to-free-on-error-path, which become compile errors or automatic cleanup.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. The community is divided over the project&amp;#39;s transparency, with some accusing leadership of using &amp;#34;experiment&amp;#34; rhetoric to dampen earlier criticism of a move that now appears long-planned &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48134688&quot; title=&quot;You, nine days ago[0]: &amp;gt; I work on Bun and this is my branch &amp;gt; This whole thread is an overreaction. 302 comments about code that does not work. We haven’t committed to rewriting. There’s a very high chance all this code gets thrown out completely. Maybe... it wasn&amp;#39;t such an overreaction? [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48019226&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48136170&quot; title=&quot;Yes sure it&amp;#39;s ok to change your mind. But don&amp;#39;t you think the people Jarred accused of &amp;#39;overreacting&amp;#39; in retrospect didn&amp;#39;t?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48132737&quot; title=&quot;Turns out &amp;#39;its just an experiment, you all are overreacting&amp;#39; was just a lie to damp criticism. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48019226&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48140229&quot; title=&quot;When announcements say that rewrite took 1 week, I wonder how much time went into preparing this file with very detailed instructions on mapping Zig to Rust idioms: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/commit/46d3bc29f270fa881dd573... On top of that, if you look at &amp;#39;Pointers &amp;amp; ownership&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;Collections&amp;#39; sections, the Bun codebase is already prepared, using internal smart pointer types that map 1-to-1 to Rust equivalents, and `bun_collections` Rust crate already exists. This makes an impression,…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, skeptics point to the high volume of `unsafe` blocks and the massive codebase size—now exceeding one million lines of Rust—as potential indicators of unmanaged complexity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138915&quot; title=&quot;$ rg &amp;#39;unsafe [{]&amp;#39; src/ | wc -l      10428      $ rg &amp;#39;unsafe [{]&amp;#39; src/ -l | wc -l      736            Language        Files     Lines      Code  Comments    Blanks      ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━      Rust             1443    929213    732281    116293     80639      Zig              1298    711112    574563     59118     77431      TypeScript       2604    654684    510464     82254     61966      JavaScript       4370    364928    293211     36108     35609      C      …&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138928&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; +1009257 -4024 Bun is now over 1M lines of Rust code. This is approaching the size of the Rust compiler itself; except that BunJs is mostly a JavaScript interpreter wrapper + a reimplementation of the NodeJS library (Rust STD wrapper). I think BunJS is becoming the canary for software complexity management in the LLM era.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139207&quot; title=&quot;The half of the files contain &amp;#39;unsafe&amp;#39; keyword? It doesn&amp;#39;t seem as a good rewrite. What is the point of rewrite into Rust, if ~half of your code is still unsafe?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://president.mit.edu/writing-speeches/video-transcript-message-president-kornbluth-about-funding-and-talent-pipeline&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A message from President Kornbluth about funding and the talent pipeline&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (president.mit.edu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48136262&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;618 points · &lt;strong&gt;704 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by dmayo&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MIT President Sally Kornbluth reports that the Institute faces significant budget and talent challenges due to an 8% endowment tax, a 20% decline in new federal research awards, and a projected 20% drop in new graduate student enrollments. &lt;a href=&quot;https://president.mit.edu/writing-speeches/video-transcript-message-president-kornbluth-about-funding-and-talent-pipeline&quot; title=&quot;Title: Video transcript: A message from President Kornbluth about funding and the talent pipeline | MIT Office of the President | MIT    URL Source: https://president.mit.edu/writing-speeches/video-transcript-message-president-kornbluth-about-funding-and-talent-pipeline    Markdown Content:  Hello, everyone.    It’s been a while since I’ve spoken with you all.    But the Institute is facing ongoing challenges in two related areas: funding, and our talent pipeline.    So I thought you’d appreciate hearing…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The academic system is facing a &amp;#34;generational reset&amp;#34; as students become increasingly disillusioned by grueling six-year PhD timelines, low pay, and exploitative advisor relationships &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48136999&quot; title=&quot;Besides the people in this thread bemoaning the state of research funding, international students, etc. (all of which are valid), a lot of people are becoming disillusioned with academia. Probably 80% of the recent PhD grads I know are looking to leave academia, despite the fact that they went into it to pursue a career in academia. The median science PhD takes 6 years now, and is grueling work for terrible pay, all for difficult job prospects given the current market. MIT recently became one…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48137778&quot; title=&quot;I used to work with a brilliant and humble guy. He got accepted to MIT at 14, but his parents made him go to community college for a year to give him a little more time to mature. He then went to MIT and graduated after three years, then went to Berkeley and got a masters in one year, then went to Stanford and it took six years to get his PhD? Why? Because his advisor milked him for his work. She had a pile of papers to peer review ... hand it off to the grad studends. Have a talk to give? Give…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48137027&quot; title=&quot;Academia is about to go through a generational reset. The system is broken and the market only tolerates broken systems for so long. There are a ton of great things that come out of universities but it’s also clear that a model of charging folks well into the six-figures for a useless degree that doesn’t prepare them for the workforce is dead and a reckoning is underway. Many schools will fail and shut down. Of those left they will be much smaller and with tremendous focus on bringing the…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that long durations are necessary apprenticeships to develop research &amp;#34;taste&amp;#34; and professional networks, others contend that the system has become a broken model of &amp;#34;milking&amp;#34; students for labor &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48137778&quot; title=&quot;I used to work with a brilliant and humble guy. He got accepted to MIT at 14, but his parents made him go to community college for a year to give him a little more time to mature. He then went to MIT and graduated after three years, then went to Berkeley and got a masters in one year, then went to Stanford and it took six years to get his PhD? Why? Because his advisor milked him for his work. She had a pile of papers to peer review ... hand it off to the grad studends. Have a talk to give? Give…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48137913&quot; title=&quot;Speaking as someone who has graduated over a dozen PhD students in computer science... Yes, it is possible to complete a PhD in 3-4 years, but it&amp;#39;s not really good for your career.  The bar our department sets for a PhD is that at the end of it, you should be a world expert in your specific topic. A PhD is more like an apprenticeship, where you develop and refine your skills, your background knowledge in your area of specialization, your ability to write and do presentations, and your taste in…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. This decline in domestic interest, coupled with a heavy reliance on international talent, has led to warnings of a &amp;#34;brain drain&amp;#34; that threatens America’s historical dominance in groundbreaking research &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48136396&quot; title=&quot;MIT Current Graduate Student are 41% international. https://facts.mit.edu/enrollment-statistics/&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48136462&quot; title=&quot;Yup, it’s called a brain drain and it’s why until recently America held a vice grip on groundbreaking research and its commercialization.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48136419&quot; title=&quot;Good. The US is reaping what it sows, and other research institutions will become the new leaders. Stinks for Americans, but the world will be better off overall.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-for-small-business&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Claude for Small Business&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (anthropic.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48130950&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;539 points · 472 comments · by neilfrndes&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic has launched Claude for Small Business, a suite of connectors and 15 agentic workflows that integrate the AI into tools like QuickBooks, PayPal, and HubSpot to automate tasks such as payroll planning, invoice chasing, and marketing campaigns. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-for-small-business&quot; title=&quot;Title: Introducing Claude for Small Business    URL Source: https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-for-small-business    Markdown Content:  We&amp;#39;re launching [Claude for Small Business](https://claude.com/solutions/small-business)—a package of connectors and ready-to-run workflows that put Claude inside the tools small businesses depend on—to help small business owners take full advantage of AI and cross off items on the to-do list.    Small businesses account for 44% of U.S. GDP and employ nearly half…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The introduction of Claude for small business has sparked a debate over &amp;#34;vibecoding,&amp;#34; with some arguing that a simplified UI for coding agents could become the &amp;#34;Excel of databases&amp;#34; for non-technical users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48131535&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m increasingly convinced that there&amp;#39;s a killer app waiting for whoever can come up with a UI that makes claude code or codex accessible to the average user. Onboarding my non-software engineer teammates to it has super-charged them and essentially given them all their own personal developer that can automate tasks for them.  Managing codebases, etc. is still a hassle though. 90% of the power of Excel was that it was functionally a database that a normal person could actually use.  I think…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48131968&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; that makes claude code or codex accessible to the average user That&amp;#39;s what they aim Claude Cowork at. Every executive/leader I&amp;#39;ve shown Claude Cowork to has gone from &amp;#39;what is AI&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;vibecoding whole apps&amp;#39; in weeks. Then when Claude is down for an hour, they get visibly angry and don&amp;#39;t remember how to do anything pre-Claude :) I understand the impulse to provide a UI to manage codebases, etc. But my observation is that these people just ask Claude to do whatever it is they need done.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While proponents highlight how executives are now building apps and automating tasks independently, critics warn of significant risks, including security vulnerabilities, unvetted documentation, and a future of &amp;#34;shitty&amp;#34; code that fewer people are qualified to fix &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48132775&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Every executive/leader I&amp;#39;ve shown Claude Cowork to has gone from &amp;#39;what is AI&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;vibecoding whole apps&amp;#39; in weeks. Do you, and those executives, own the risks associated with that practice? Are those risks actually indemnified? Its neat that &amp;#39;anyone can do anything&amp;#39; but if they don&amp;#39;t actually know what the risk to business or 3rd parties, why is this a good thing, especially in the enterprise where there are actors who are explicitly looking for this type of environment to exploit?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48132709&quot; title=&quot;The future is perpetually dealing with the fallout from all the vibe coding as the pool of people who&amp;#39;d have a shot at fixing it gets smaller and smaller. Shitty will be the new normal.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48133733&quot; title=&quot;I have seen people just generate large docs with Claude cowork and they themselves have not scrutinized it or know why/how it&amp;#39;s useful.  It&amp;#39;s just kind of impressive in its volume and well formatedness.  And then they dump it in your lap as being helpful&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48133107&quot; title=&quot;These are largely friends and peers, so they ultimately own their own risks. But I&amp;#39;m not saying it is good or bad. I&amp;#39;m just telling you what is happening in the real world. Every senior person I know, whether a high tech exec or a solo coffee bean importer, is vibing to some degree. Some will be more successful than others. I&amp;#39;ve been working in tech since the late 90s. This is the biggest and most sudden change in company behavior I&amp;#39;ve ever seen. The only thing that comes close was the web 1.0…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, there is deep skepticism regarding the reliability of LLMs handling sensitive financial tasks like payroll and taxes, especially given Anthropic&amp;#39;s perceived lack of customer support &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48133818&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; PayPal powers settlements, invoicing, disputes, and refunds inside Claude. &amp;gt; Intuit QuickBooks handles payroll planning, the monthly close, and cash-flow, along with tools to help businesses prepare for tax season, and reconciliation work that touches every other system. I can&amp;#39;t wait for the horror stories, this is going to be fun. Remember last month when Anthropic was like: no, we&amp;#39;re not going to refund you even though we admit we&amp;#39;re in the wrong for anti-competitively burning credits?…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/tdietterich/status/2055000956144935055&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;New arXiv policy: 1-year ban for hallucinated references&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48140922&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;648 points · 227 comments · by gjuggler&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;arXiv has updated its Code of Conduct to hold authors fully responsible for all paper content regardless of how it was generated, including a one-year ban for submitting hallucinated references. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/tdietterich/status/2055000956144935055&quot; title=&quot;Title: Thomas G. Dietterich on X: &amp;#39;Attention @arxiv authors: Our Code of Conduct states that by signing your name as an author of a paper, each author takes full responsibility for all its contents, irrespective of how the contents were generated. 1/&amp;#39; / X    URL Source: https://twitter.com/tdietterich/status/2055000956144935055    Markdown Content:  ## Post    ## Conversation    [Thomas G.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;arXiv&amp;#39;s new policy, which includes a one-year ban and a permanent requirement for peer-review approval for future submissions, has sparked intense debate over whether hallucinated citations constitute fraud &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48141324&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The penalty is a 1-year ban from arXiv followed by the requirement that subsequent arXiv submissions must first be accepted at a reputable peer-reviewed venue. This is incredibly good for science. arXiv is free, but it&amp;#39;s a privilege not a right! I&amp;#39;m not seeing this clearly listed on https://info.arxiv.org/help/policies/index.html so it&amp;#39;s possible this is planned but not live yet - or perhaps I&amp;#39;m not digging deeply enough? As a certain doctor once said: the whole point of the doomsday machine…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142322&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This is incredibly good for science. I disagree. It&amp;#39;s just one darn hallucinated citation for heaven&amp;#39;s sake, not fraud or something. It doesn&amp;#39;t account for the substance or quality of their work at all. A one-year ban seems plenty sufficient for a minor first time mistake like this. People make mistakes and a good fraction of them can learn from those mistakes. There&amp;#39;s no need to permanently cripple someone&amp;#39;s ability to progress their life or contribute to humanity just because an AI…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Supporters argue that fabricating references represents &amp;#34;gross negligence&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;reckless disregard&amp;#34; for truth that taints the entire work &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142541&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;  It&amp;#39;s just one darn hallucinated citation for heaven&amp;#39;s sake, not fraud or something. It is fraud. &amp;gt; It doesn&amp;#39;t account for the substance or quality of their work at all. References are part of the work. If you&amp;#39;re making up the references, what else are you making up? &amp;gt; People make mistakes and a good fraction of them can learn from those mistakes. There&amp;#39;s no need to permanently cripple someone&amp;#39;s ability to progress their life or contribute to humanity just because an AI hallucinated a…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142389&quot; title=&quot;A &amp;#39;mistake&amp;#39; would be a typo in a real citation. A hallucinated citation is evidence of just plain laziness and negligence, which taints the entire submission.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48143131&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It is fraud. I think we are talking semantics here. While fraud does require intention to deceive, I get the sentiment that hallucinated citations shouldn&amp;#39;t be dismissed as simply carelessness. It should be something stronger than that: gross negligence or something MUCH stronger! There should absolutely be repercussions for this. But let&amp;#39;s not call it fraud. That word is reserved for something specific. EDIT: someone else said &amp;#39;reckless disregard&amp;#39; equals intent or something to that effect.…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142799&quot; title=&quot;Fraud requires intent to deceive _or_ reckless disregard, sometimes called, “conscious indifference” for the veracity of the statement asserted.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, while critics contend that such errors can result from simple &amp;#34;last minute&amp;#34; mistakes by lab partners rather than an intent to deceive &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142604&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It is fraud. No, it is emphatically not.  Fraud requires intent to deceive. &amp;gt; A one year ban is not permanent. ...what text are you reading? Nobody was calling the one-year ban permanent, or even against it. I was literally in favor of it in my comment. I explicitly said it is already plenty sufficient. What I said is there&amp;#39;s no need to go beyond that. My entire gripe was that they very much are going beyond that with a permanent penalty. Did you completely miss where they said &amp;#39;...followed by…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142530&quot; title=&quot;No it is not. Seriously. All you need for this to happen is for your lab partner to ask AI to add a missing citation that they are already familiar with at the last minute before a midnight submission deadline, and for the AI to hallucinate something else, and for them to honestly miss this. It does not even imply any involvement on your part, let alone that either of you were lazy or negligent on the actual research or substance of the paper. The lack of any sympathy or imagination here is…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142395&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s not the kind of mistake that is possible unless you&amp;#39;re engaging in fraud anyway. Seriously? You can&amp;#39;t fathom an honest researcher asking for AI to find a citation they know exists, and the AI inserting or modifying a citation incorrectly without them realizing? If you find evidence of fraud by all means lay down the hammer. Using a single hallucinated citation like it&amp;#39;s some kind of ironclad proxy just because you think they must be committing fraud is insane.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While there is some consensus that a temporary ban is a sufficient rehabilitative measure, many users disagree on whether the permanent restriction on future independent posting is an overly punitive response to a &amp;#34;minor first-time mistake&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142322&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This is incredibly good for science. I disagree. It&amp;#39;s just one darn hallucinated citation for heaven&amp;#39;s sake, not fraud or something. It doesn&amp;#39;t account for the substance or quality of their work at all. A one-year ban seems plenty sufficient for a minor first time mistake like this. People make mistakes and a good fraction of them can learn from those mistakes. There&amp;#39;s no need to permanently cripple someone&amp;#39;s ability to progress their life or contribute to humanity just because an AI…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142604&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It is fraud. No, it is emphatically not.  Fraud requires intent to deceive. &amp;gt; A one year ban is not permanent. ...what text are you reading? Nobody was calling the one-year ban permanent, or even against it. I was literally in favor of it in my comment. I explicitly said it is already plenty sufficient. What I said is there&amp;#39;s no need to go beyond that. My entire gripe was that they very much are going beyond that with a permanent penalty. Did you completely miss where they said &amp;#39;...followed by…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://scottjg.com/posts/2026-05-05-egpu-mac-gaming/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;RTX 5090 and M4 MacBook Air: Can It Game?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (scottjg.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48137145&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;693 points · 178 comments · by allenleee&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By utilizing a custom Linux VM and engineering complex PCI passthrough workarounds, this project successfully connects an RTX 5090 eGPU to an M4 MacBook Air, enabling 4K gaming and boosting AI inference speeds by up to 120x despite significant virtualization and emulation overhead. &lt;a href=&quot;https://scottjg.com/posts/2026-05-05-egpu-mac-gaming/&quot; title=&quot;Title: RTX 5090 + M4 MacBook Air: Can it Game?    URL Source: https://scottjg.com/posts/2026-05-05-egpu-mac-gaming/    Published Time: 2026-05-05T10:17:25-08:00    Markdown Content:  What if you could strap a full desktop GPU to your MacBook Air? Turns out, you can.    Just a quick FTC required note: When you buy through my links, I may earn a commission.    ## Never tell me the odds    As much as I hate to admit it, step one in most of my projects now is to ask AI about it. Maybe it’ll tell me something I…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a massive performance gap in LLM &amp;#34;prefill&amp;#34; speeds, where an eGPU can process prompts up to 120x faster than an M4 MacBook Air &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138265&quot; title=&quot;Excellent article. The game benchmarks are fun but the LLM improvements are where this gets really interesting for practical use. I love Apple platforms as an approachable way to run local models with a lot of RAM, but their relatively slow prompt processing speed is often overlooked. &amp;gt; Here you can see the big issue with Macs: the prompt processing (aka “prefill”) speed. It just gets worse and worse, the longer the prompt gets. At a 4K-token prompt, which doesn’t seem very long, it takes 17…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users hope for official GPU pass-through support to bridge this gap, others argue that Apple has effectively abandoned the professional workstation market by failing to support NVIDIA hardware or internal expansion slots &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48137817&quot; title=&quot;I have been bothering the VM team for years for VM GPU pass through. I worked on the Apple Silicon Mac Pro and it would have made way more sense if you could run a linux VM and pass through the GPU that goes inside the case! Sadly, as you can tell, they have not taken me up on my requests. Awesome that other people got it working!&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138082&quot; title=&quot;I still believe the lack of NVIDIA GPU support in the Mac Pro will go down as one of the greatest missed opportunities in tech. Anyway, the Mac Pro is dead now. There&amp;#39;s only so much sales audio and video professionals can provide.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139296&quot; title=&quot;Never, a couple of years ago Apple gave up on the server market, that is why having Swift on Linux is so relevant for app developers. Now they gave up on the workstation market that really enjoys their slots for all myriad of cards. Having a thunderbolt cable salad is only for those that miss external extensions from 8 and 16 bit home computer days. Which is clearly what Apple is nowadays focused, if you look back at the vertical integrations before the PC clones market took off. So now if you…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the thread touches on the unreliability of AI assistants, noting their tendency to hallucinate hardware specs or repeat factual errors even after being corrected &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48137797&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; As much as I hate to admit it, step one in most of my projects now is to ask AI about it. Maybe it’ll tell me something I don’t know. Or, more likely, it will tell you something it doesn&amp;#39;t know. Reminds me of yesterday, when I was arguing with ChatGPT that the 5070TI was an actual video card.  It kept trying to correct me by saying I must have meant a 4070ti, since no such 5070ti card exists.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48137958&quot; title=&quot;Or, it will acknowledge that it made a mistake and continue to make the same mistake again. I asked Claude to generate an HTML page about PowerShell 7.   It gave me a page saying 7.4 was the latest LTS release.   I corrected it with links showing 7.6 was released in March   and asked it to regenerate with the latest information. It generated basically the same page with   the same claim that 7.4 was the latest release.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138119&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Or, it will acknowledge that it made a mistake and continue to make the same mistake again. People do this too though. At least the AI generally tries to follow instructions that you give it even when you are lacking clarity in the details. I feel like it&amp;#39;s similar to the self-driving car problem. The car could have 99.9999% reliability, drive much better and safer than a human, yet folks will still freak out about a single mistake that&amp;#39;s made even though you have actual humans today driving…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jpain.io/god-damn-ai-is-making-me-dumb/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI is making me dumb&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jpain.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139148&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;548 points · 302 comments · by Eighth&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author reflects on how over-reliance on AI for writing and coding has eroded his technical skills and fueled self-doubt, leading him to reclaim his &amp;#34;professionalism&amp;#34; by returning to manual coding and writing. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jpain.io/god-damn-ai-is-making-me-dumb/&quot; title=&quot;Title: God Damn AI is making me dumb    URL Source: https://jpain.io/god-damn-ai-is-making-me-dumb/    Published Time: Thu, 14 May 2026 21:47:17 GMT    Markdown Content:  # God Damn AI is making me dumb | James Pain&amp;#39;s Weblog  # [James Pain&amp;#39;s Weblog](https://jpain.io/)  # God Damn AI is making me dumb    _14 May, 2026_    It&amp;#39;s so god damn tempting to use AI to write. Whether it is articles, code, or documents. I feel like using AI is diminishing my ability to write myself.    I didn&amp;#39;t necessarily feel I was…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Experienced developers emphasize that while AI provides a &amp;#34;dopamine hit&amp;#34; of rapid productivity, it often produces verbose, low-quality code that requires rigorous human review to avoid mounting technical debt &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139506&quot; title=&quot;I can&amp;#39;t relate that much to this. Every time I use AI to write code, I&amp;#39;m constantly fighting a feeling on the back of my neck that I need to look over everything it has done and supplement/alter it with my own code. That ick feeling counteracts the dopamine hit of having a working app after a few minutes of vibe coding, and I don&amp;#39;t think that&amp;#39;s going anywhere anytime soon. That said, I have experience. I could absolutely see myself falling into this as a junior or even mid level dev. I&amp;#39;d no…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139883&quot; title=&quot;In my experience, Claude only knows how to spew code. Every problem you want it to solve, it translates into &amp;#39;more code&amp;#39; rather than &amp;#39;less code&amp;#39;. You have to very closely code review everything it does, otherwise your codebase is going to just grow and grow, and asymptotically approach 100% debt. I code review everything that Claude produces, and I&amp;#39;d estimate about 90-95% of the time, my reaction is WOW it works but too much code dude, let&amp;#39;s take 3 hours to handhold you through simplifying it…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48140083&quot; title=&quot;As a developer, I kind of feel like this all smells like job security. After using LLMs for a while, I have to admit it&amp;#39;s pretty nice, and I like using it. I&amp;#39;ve been vibecoding a few apps, and it&amp;#39;s a good dopamine hit to immediately see your ideas come to life. However, based on my experience, it will bite you if you trust it blindly. Even in my vibecoded projects, it keeps adding &amp;#39;features&amp;#39; without me asking for them. Since they&amp;#39;re just pet projects, I don’t really care as long as the end…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong consensus that senior engineers must act as &amp;#34;agent commanders&amp;#34; to guide these tools, leading to concerns that junior developers may struggle to gain the foundational experience necessary to catch AI-generated errors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139560&quot; title=&quot;Experience is so so valuable right now. We can guide these agents super well, but I do fear for the juniors as you said. I would like to think I&amp;#39;d use the agents to dive deeper and learn faster. It was pretty rough piecing together solutions from Stack Overflow, various irc channels, Reddit, etc. But also, I cheated on my homework in college and didn&amp;#39;t really review the answers, so not sure. Though I pursued programming out of interest and not just to complete a degree. Maybe it would have been…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48140083&quot; title=&quot;As a developer, I kind of feel like this all smells like job security. After using LLMs for a while, I have to admit it&amp;#39;s pretty nice, and I like using it. I&amp;#39;ve been vibecoding a few apps, and it&amp;#39;s a good dopamine hit to immediately see your ideas come to life. However, based on my experience, it will bite you if you trust it blindly. Even in my vibecoded projects, it keeps adding &amp;#39;features&amp;#39; without me asking for them. Since they&amp;#39;re just pet projects, I don’t really care as long as the end…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139886&quot; title=&quot;I’m not using AI to eliminate thinking but to free me from the rote mundane code writing. AI is perfectly competent at writing code once a prototype is implemented. I do write initial proof of concept crude prototypes (not commented, hardcoded variables, etc), and AI does the productionizing of them. It has really allowed me to command a team of agents instead of keeping track of a bunch of humans of varying work ethic, skill, and ability to maintain high code quality. And often AI is very good…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that AI represents a shift to a higher level of abstraction where &amp;#34;thinking&amp;#34; or manual optimization is less critical, others maintain that human oversight remains essential to prevent unintentional feature creep and architectural decay &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139459&quot; title=&quot;We&amp;#39;ll just move to a higher level of abstraction; thinking will be like efficiently coding in assembly, no longer necessary in today&amp;#39;s world.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48140684&quot; title=&quot;At this point, it&amp;#39;s worth asking whether lots of relatively straightforward verbose code is actually significantly worse than the least code necessary for the problem.  Obviously, architecture matters. What might matter less is verbosity. The reason we aimed for minimal &amp;#39;accidental complexity&amp;#39; up to now was directly related to the cost/pain of changing and maintaining that code. Hasn&amp;#39;t the economics of maintenance and change shifted so much that accidental complexity isn&amp;#39;t actually all that…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48140083&quot; title=&quot;As a developer, I kind of feel like this all smells like job security. After using LLMs for a while, I have to admit it&amp;#39;s pretty nice, and I like using it. I&amp;#39;ve been vibecoding a few apps, and it&amp;#39;s a good dopamine hit to immediately see your ideas come to life. However, based on my experience, it will bite you if you trust it blindly. Even in my vibecoded projects, it keeps adding &amp;#39;features&amp;#39; without me asking for them. Since they&amp;#39;re just pet projects, I don’t really care as long as the end…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139550&quot; title=&quot;A higher level of abstraction that doesn&amp;#39;t require thinking? Did you mean to write thinking here?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openai.com/index/work-with-codex-from-anywhere/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Codex is now in the ChatGPT mobile app&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (openai.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48140529&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;484 points · 247 comments · by mikeevans&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI has integrated Codex into the ChatGPT mobile app, allowing users to remotely manage, review, and approve long-running development tasks across their connected local or remote environments from iOS and Android devices. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openai.com/index/work-with-codex-from-anywhere/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Work with Codex from anywhere    URL Source: https://openai.com/index/work-with-codex-from-anywhere/    Markdown Content:  Codex is now in the ChatGPT mobile app so you can stay in the loop from anywhere while Codex gets work done across your laptops, devboxes, or remote environments.    As agents take on longer-running work, a new rhythm for collaboration is emerging. To keep work moving, you need to be able to easily answer a question, review what Codex found, change direction, approve what…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The integration of Codex into the ChatGPT mobile app has sparked debate over its utility, with some users praising the ability to &amp;#34;vibe code&amp;#34; or draft implementations while away from a keyboard &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144385&quot; title=&quot;(Someone deleted a comment about why you&amp;#39;d want a mobile Codex app.  This is the answer I wrote.) Once you&amp;#39;ve used these coding agents a lot, you develop a pretty intuitive feel for how they work, what they&amp;#39;re capable of, what they&amp;#39;re good at, and where their weaknesses are.  Hopefully, you&amp;#39;re already pretty familiar with the code base you&amp;#39;re working on.  Combining the two, this means you can get quite far essentially &amp;#39;vibe coding&amp;#39; (i.e. not looking at the actual code) on a new branch. So if…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, while others find the mobile interface leads to lower-quality output and increased technical debt &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142142&quot; title=&quot;I’ve been using Codex from my phone for the past couple of months (through a tunnel, not this app). I was initially quite excited, but I’ve found the results are less than great compared to being at a keyboard. Something about the smaller screen size and/or lack of keyboard causes me to direct the agent less, which in turn creates more tech debt/code churn/etc. Maybe I’m just showing my age, and I should practice voice dictation or something more, but my thoughts flow faster and more clearly on…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48143765&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Stay connected to active work from anywhere And here I thought AI was gonna automate the world and we were gonna work less. Turns out you’re gonna work 24/7 no matter where you are!&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While the service is currently free for ChatGPT users, there is skepticism regarding potential rate limits and the performance of the free model compared to paid alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48141489&quot; title=&quot;Whats crazier is that Codex is free. I thought I had to pay to even try it out but nope, you can use the desktop app or cli for free, its apparently included in the free plan. You just have to sign in to your ChatGPT account. Of course I am aware that the caveat here is that all my interaction is part of training, but I’m fine with that. Even Qwen Cli discontinued the free plan.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48141690&quot; title=&quot;I think it&amp;#39;s free for about 2 useful requests and then you have to upgrade or wait?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142589&quot; title=&quot;I was really unimpressed by the free Codex (for nodejs/react dev). I think it must be using a less powerful model or they’re limiting it in some other way.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical frustrations persist regarding remote connectivity and local file management &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142400&quot; title=&quot;Is there a native way to work remotely with Claude/Codex on a local folder or git repo on your main machine without having to connect it to GitHub? For creating apps for personal use I’d rather just keep the files local. Edit: Running into issues setting it up on Windows. There&amp;#39;s no &amp;#39;/remote-control&amp;#39; command in the CLI, so I installed the Windows Codex app. Then I updated the iOS app which now has the &amp;#39;Codex&amp;#39; feature in the sidebar, which should allow remote access to the Windows machine&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, though some users are migrating back from Claude due to its more restrictive usage limits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142382&quot; title=&quot;So basically a 20$ Claude plan lmao&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142479&quot; title=&quot;I stopped using my Claude subscription because it became so prohibitive. Back to ChatGPT and Codex full time and been pretty happy. I miss the tone/writing style of Claude, but don&amp;#39;t miss the frustration of being told I&amp;#39;ve reached my plan limits in a comically short amount of time.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c2l2j1lxdk5o&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;UK government replaces Palantir software with internally-built refugee system&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142251&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;518 points · 208 comments · by cdrnsf&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The UK government has replaced Palantir’s software with an internally developed system to manage data for the Homes for Ukraine refugee program. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c2l2j1lxdk5o&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;shkspr.mobi&amp;amp;#x2F;blog&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;05&amp;amp;#x2F;uk-government-kicks-out-palantir&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;shkspr.mobi&amp;amp;#x2F;blog&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;05&amp;amp;#x2F;uk-government-kicks-out-pal...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The UK government’s reliance on Palantir and other external consultancies is driven by rigid civil service pay bands that prevent hiring engineers at market rates, forcing departments to pay higher premiums for outsourced labor to avoid &amp;#34;bloat&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48146859&quot; title=&quot;I say this as somebody who has worked vendor side in UK public sector for a number of years. It&amp;#39;s policy. It&amp;#39;s official Whitehall policy. As a department you can&amp;#39;t hire programmers at £100k/year, because that pushes them way, way higher than civil service bands allow. But you can pay a &amp;#39;Systems Integrator&amp;#39; - a consultancy like Cap Gemini, Deloitte, Fujitsu - £600/day for the same programmer in the same seat. So, £100k/year = bad, £120k/year via an external consultancy = good. Then we get into…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147779&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; So, £100k/year = bad, £120k/year via an external consultancy = good. Ding ding ding. This is all driven by ideological mistrust of the public sector, as you&amp;#39;ve pointed out and people are even defending in the comments.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48146225&quot; title=&quot;The revolving door as it&amp;#39;s known. That&amp;#39;s part of it. Another is simply the lack of in-house talent, largely due to poor pay and conditions. It&amp;#39;s a self-fulfilling prophecy to a certain extent. I&amp;#39;d love to work for NHS digital and make a difference, but all the interesting work is contracted out, so they can&amp;#39;t keep the staff who are capable of building themselves. Also the recruitment process is terrible. Take a look at this job posting for example:…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While Palantir provides a &amp;#34;consulting-heavy&amp;#34; model that can assist organizations lacking data integration expertise, critics argue that building in-house is more cost-effective long-term and aligns better with standard civil service capabilities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142703&quot; title=&quot;Palantir is very expensive. This is because: 1. they aim to deliver product company margins with a consulting-heavy model. 2. your software purchase funds a cadre of &amp;#39;free&amp;#39; FDEs and deployment strategists who customize your install, build a bunch of data pipes/transforms, and talk to people to figure out what all the data means. This could be a good deal if your tech org is not very competent at integrating your data, or if you have a sudden, short-term need. In the longer term, it&amp;#39;s probably…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48145619&quot; title=&quot;I never understood why nation states pay outside companies for this stuff. You need the expertise to actually evaluate what you&amp;#39;re getting anyway. Incentives are in no way aligned. At the state level you have the scale to do it in house.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142495&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;In a 2023 blog post, external, Palantir described the challenge of combining data from multiple government systems containing tens of thousands of visa applications and hundreds of thousands of accommodation offers.&amp;#39; This is the kind of thing GDS and other Civil Service departments build all the time, its a completely standard kind of challenge that a small team of Devs (+ supporting staff) from a departments DDAT department does day in and day out. The output will be open source by default…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, disagreements persist regarding the efficiency of the public sector, with some noting that a lack of market pressure leads to inevitable bloat, while others highlight the &amp;#34;revolving door&amp;#34; between government officials and the private firms they award contracts to &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48145971&quot; title=&quot;Having spent time working in UK healthcare tech, I never understood why everyone was lining up to throw buckets of money at Palantir. Quite apart from being obviously evil and so on, none of their solutions were actually very good. Unfortunately, it&amp;#39;s hard to escape the feeling that friends in high places, some lobbying and some er... reciprocal back scratching might have been instrumental. See also senior staff at NHS England (or Digitial? can&amp;#39;t remember) handing massive NHS compute contracts…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147153&quot; title=&quot;The problem is that the civil service is inefficient and will bloat, because the only pressure on it to not is the individual good practice of leaders. There&amp;#39;s no competitive/market pressure on it to naturally cap spending based on value. I agree that GDS is a good thing, and I interviewed with them a few years ago and was impressed, but there is always the risk of bloat. I wish this could be fixed. I have some ideas about a similar concept in the NHS that would require the government hiring…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48146225&quot; title=&quot;The revolving door as it&amp;#39;s known. That&amp;#39;s part of it. Another is simply the lack of in-house talent, largely due to poor pay and conditions. It&amp;#39;s a self-fulfilling prophecy to a certain extent. I&amp;#39;d love to work for NHS digital and make a difference, but all the interesting work is contracted out, so they can&amp;#39;t keep the staff who are capable of building themselves. Also the recruitment process is terrible. Take a look at this job posting for example:…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://antirez.com/news/165&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A few words on DS4&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (antirez.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142108&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;436 points · 187 comments · by caust1c&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Salvatore Sanfilippo (antirez) discusses the rapid success of DwarfStar 4 (DS4), a local AI project optimized for DeepSeek v4 Flash, and outlines future plans including coding agents, distributed inference, and support for specialized model variants on high-end consumer hardware. &lt;a href=&quot;https://antirez.com/news/165&quot; title=&quot;Title: A few words on DS4    URL Source: https://antirez.com/news/165    Markdown Content:  [antirez](https://antirez.com/user/antirez) 7 hours ago. 60659 views. I didn’t expect DwarfStar 4 ([https://github.com/antirez/ds4](https://github.com/antirez/ds4)) to become so popular so fast. It is clear that there was a need for single-model integration focused local AI experience, and that a few things happened together: the release of a quasi-frontier model that is large and fast enough to change the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users report that DwarfStar4 (DS4) enables DeepSeek v4 to run efficiently on high-end consumer hardware, achieving generation speeds of nearly 30 tokens per second &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142458&quot; title=&quot;I got this running on a 128GB M5 the other day - pretty painless, model runs in about 80GB of RAM and it seemed to be very capable at writing code and tool execution.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48143570&quot; title=&quot;DwarfStar4 is a small LLM inference runtime that can run DeepSeek 4. The blog post implies that it currently requires 96GB of VRAM. For others who are lacking context :-)&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142555&quot; title=&quot;Healthy! prefill: 30.91 t/s, generation: 29.58 t/s From https://gist.github.com/simonw/31127f9025845c4c9b10c3e0d8612...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate the necessity of a model-specific inference engine over established tools like llama.cpp, others argue that the increasing intelligence of such models may soon disrupt the business models of major providers like Anthropic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48143808&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m very curious where we will saturate the curve on &amp;#39;enough&amp;#39; intelligence for coding. At some point, you can let a less smart model hammer at a problem for longer and get to the same result, and as long as you are not involved it comes to the same thing. I feel like DeepSeek V4 Pro is nearly there. Maybe Flash is too. Once we hit that point, I am curious how much of Anthropic&amp;#39;s current business model falls apart? So far it&amp;#39;s always been clear that you just pay for the most intelligent model…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142674&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t see an explanation of why they would make a model-specific inference engine vs just using llamacpp. There are already lots of people working on the llamacpp integration. This is a lot of effort spent on a single model which is likely to become obsolete when a different model comes out that does better. In some discussions, people are now making PRs against both the llamacpp branches and ds4... so it&amp;#39;s taking a rare commodity (people investing development time in this model) and…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also touches on the validity of current benchmarks, with some users defending the empirical performance data available for the runtime &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48143178&quot; title=&quot;Empirically, DS4 is hosting the DeepSeek v4 Flash model with good performance on home hardware. I&amp;#39;m curious how you came to this conclusion.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144043&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s trivial to find reviews and benchmarks of DS4 online. Also, there are benchmarks in the article. Here&amp;#39;s one of the top hits: https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/fully-custom-cuda-nati... Bizarre comment; sounds like &amp;#39;How do you know Porsches are fast? Did you drive one?&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blogs.cisco.com/news/our-path-forward&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cisco workforce reductions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blogs.cisco.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48130123&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;280 points · &lt;strong&gt;316 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by ahmedomran8&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cisco is reducing its global workforce by fewer than 4,000 employees, or less than 5%, to realign resources toward strategic growth areas like AI, security, and silicon despite reporting record Q3 revenue. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blogs.cisco.com/news/our-path-forward&quot; title=&quot;Our Path Forward    Cisco announces a realignment of resources to support strategic investment areas and a workforce reduction. Cisco announces a realignment of resources to support strategic investment areas and a workforce reduction.    [Skip to content](#content)    [![Cisco Logo](https://blogs.cisco.com/wp-content/themes/ciscowordpress-child/svg/cisco_logo.svg)](https://blogs.cisco.com)    [Cisco Blogs](https://blogs.cisco.com)    [Executive…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the perceived misuse of H-1B visas and &amp;#34;diversity&amp;#34; initiatives to replace domestic workers with cheaper labor, with several commenters noting that Cisco and other large firms often have departments that are almost entirely composed of Indian nationals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48131033&quot; title=&quot;This type of thing should come along with a reduction of allowed H-1bs.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48131207&quot; title=&quot;Cisco especially is absolutely full of H1Bs. As someone that has worked for them a decade ago, some of their division are &amp;gt;90% Indian. Those are all good engineers and not dunking on them at all but it should be unacceptable to bring over competing workers on a visa while also laying off so many people.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48131368&quot; title=&quot;we were acquired and part of our org moved into cisco HQ. the entire floor were Indian other than our org, and over time our org was filled out with incoming transfers and new hires. i&amp;#39;ll never forget some irony in that one of the engineering leaders brought us together for a mini townhall once and praised our &amp;#39;diversity&amp;#39; but by then the percentage of people in the room were basically the same as you described, including said leader. even our twice a week catered lunches were almost always…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48131733&quot; title=&quot;Diversity is the term to disguise cheaper labor. Call it women, ethnic minorities, trans, neuro divergent, on wheelchair, or those having criminal records. It&amp;#39;s a brilliant slogan, not just because virtue signalling, but because it spawns cross cultural factions, all selfishly united to defend it. At no further brainwashing cost to you. You dare to attack it? You are out. Pack your stuff, and your shame. Consolation? It would at least provide opportunities to those who always suffered…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that layoffs are being driven by investor pressure to prioritize short-term cash and AI-driven cost-cutting, even when companies are performing well &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48131084&quot; title=&quot;My extremely cynical, but not yet proven wrong view: Tech, more or less, has a group of investors centered around Silicon Valley. Not the only ones, but especially now, the most active. Generally, these folk have a lot of exposure to AI, and probably mostly believe the hype around it. Which means they believe companies using AI should produce better results, which in the current market means short-term cash. So if a company doesn&amp;#39;t do layoffs, no matter how well it is doing, it is seen as…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48134132&quot; title=&quot;I briefly worked for Cisco after an acquisition, and it was a great time: I would get my sprint’s worth of work done in two days, ask if I could do anything else and be told no, and then spend the rest of the two weeks doing whatever I wanted, which at the time was learning Rust. All that is to say, I would not be remotely surprised if Cisco has more employees than they strictly need. But, this email from the CEO is comically out of touch. “We’re doing great, better than we’ve ever done, so…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant frustration regarding the loss of unvested RSUs during these cuts, which some view as a convenient way for corporations to claw back earned compensation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48130964&quot; title=&quot;The other thing is that the laid off employees will lose all their unvested RSUs. These shares were granted as compensation for past performance but they can now be conveniently clawed back by the company just because they decide to lay you off. Stock can be a large part of someone&amp;#39;s compensation in a tech company. Companies shouldn&amp;#39;t be allowed to benefit this way if they decide to lay off employees.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48131132&quot; title=&quot;Alas this happens in all FAANG layoffs too, some lucky people get to received one more vest but nothing close to all unvested RSUs&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.calif.io/p/first-public-kernel-memory-corruption&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;First public macOS kernel memory corruption exploit on Apple M5&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.calif.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139219&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;457 points · 128 comments · by quadrige&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Security researchers at Calif have developed the first public macOS kernel memory corruption exploit for the Apple M5 chip, successfully bypassing Apple&amp;#39;s new hardware-assisted Memory Integrity Enforcement (MIE) to achieve local privilege escalation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.calif.io/p/first-public-kernel-memory-corruption&quot; title=&quot;Title: First public macOS kernel memory corruption exploit on Apple M5    URL Source: https://blog.calif.io/p/first-public-kernel-memory-corruption    Published Time: 2026-05-14T14:59:54+00:00    Markdown Content:  Early this week, we had a meeting at Apple Park in Cupertino. While there, we also shared with Apple our latest vulnerability research report: the first public macOS kernel memory corruption exploit on M5 silicon, surviving…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discovery of a kernel memory corruption exploit on Apple&amp;#39;s M5 chip has sparked debate over how the bug bypassed security features like Memory Tagging Extension (MTE) and why Apple’s aggressive bounds checking failed to prevent it &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139301&quot; title=&quot;unfortunately a little light on the details. I&amp;#39;m very curious how the bug survived through MTE&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139808&quot; title=&quot;Upon further reading on data only attacks ( https://www.usenix.org/publications/loginonline/data-only-at... ) This makes more sense. You don&amp;#39;t trigger MTE since you&amp;#39;re not doing anything for force MTE to take action the program isn&amp;#39;t actually changing. My other question would be, why didn&amp;#39;t apple use fbounds checking here? They&amp;#39;ve been doing it aggressively everywhere else. MTE plus fbounds checking everywhere should lead to an extremly hardened OS&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters are deeply divided on the impact of LLMs in this space, with some fearing that AI-driven development is eroding codebase understanding and security basics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48141496&quot; title=&quot;The world is so not ready for the impact of LLMs on security issues. If true, congrats to the Calif team. It’s likely too technical for me to understand in details but looking forward to reading the 55 pages report&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48143618&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The world is so not ready for the impact of LLMs on security issues. I agree, but it&amp;#39;s the people I&amp;#39;m worried about. I&amp;#39;m hearing anecdotes from all over about devs pushing LLM-generated code changes into production without retaining any knowledge of what it is they&amp;#39;re pushing. The changes compound, their understanding of the codebase diminishes, and so the actions become risker. What&amp;#39;s worse is a lot of this behavior is being driven by leaders, whether directly (e.g. unrealistic velocity…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that engineering teams are prepared for these shifts, others point out that most organizations lack dedicated security staff and are ill-equipped to handle an exponential increase in unpatched vulnerabilities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48141683&quot; title=&quot;you&amp;#39;re assuming that blue teams and engineers are sitting around twiddling their thumbs&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142167&quot; title=&quot;Most companies in the world do not have “blue teams”. They barely have any kind of security employee.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48141762&quot; title=&quot;Not at all. I’m considering that the amount of vulnerable software in the wild is very, very large, with most organizations not managing their systems properly. Imagine all the small to medium size companies that do not have budgets for a dedicated, talented security team. And all the software that will never be patched. We are at the beginning of the exponential&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/DepthFirstDisclosures/Nginx-Rift&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;New Nginx Exploit&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138268&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;442 points · 99 comments · by hetsaraiya&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A proof-of-concept exploit has been released for CVE-2026-42945, a critical heap buffer overflow in NGINX that allows unauthenticated remote code execution via the `rewrite` and `set` directives. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/DepthFirstDisclosures/Nginx-Rift&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - DepthFirstDisclosures/Nginx-Rift: exploit for CVE-2026-42945    URL Source: https://github.com/DepthFirstDisclosures/Nginx-Rift    Markdown Content:  # GitHub - DepthFirstDisclosures/Nginx-Rift: exploit for CVE-2026-42945 · GitHub    [Skip to content](https://github.com/DepthFirstDisclosures/Nginx-Rift#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [](https://github.com/)    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discovery of a new Nginx exploit has sparked debate over the effectiveness of modern mitigations, with security experts warning that relying on ASLR is &amp;#34;extremely harmful&amp;#34; as it is often only a matter of time before a bypass is developed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138853&quot; title=&quot;As a security person it is tiring to see so many people here either directly claim or at least allude to the claim that this is somehow much less scary because the _published_ exploit does not bypass ASLR. The writeup claims there is a way to reliably bypass ASLR with this attack. And that is a good default assumption I would be willing to believe without evidence. ASLR is a defense-in-depth technique intended to make exploitation more difficult. In almost all cases it is only a matter of time…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139499&quot; title=&quot;So you&amp;#39;re not vulnerable to script-kiddies running the published PoC. Still probably vulnerable to to a sufficiently-motivated attacker.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While the published Proof of Concept (PoC) requires specific configurations and currently disables ASLR to function, researchers note that Nginx&amp;#39;s forking model allows for unlimited worker crashes, which could facilitate a memory leak or a reliable denial of service &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138728&quot; title=&quot;Worker processes are forked from the master, which means they receive the same memory layout. You get unlimited crashes against the worker. There&amp;#39;s probably a way to exploit that to get a read oracle. At the very least this is a reliable denial of service. Depth First&amp;#39;s full writeup: https://depthfirst.com/research/nginx-rift-achieving-nginx-r...&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138580&quot; title=&quot;This one&amp;#39;s pretty bad but there are some preconditions. Requires a &amp;#39;rewrite&amp;#39; directive with a questionmark in the replacement string, and then a subsequent &amp;#39;set&amp;#39; directive that references a regex capture group (e.g. set $var $1). Also the POC assumes ASLR is disabled.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138963&quot; title=&quot;Sure, but I think the github README ought to make it more clear the POC as-is doesn&amp;#39;t work against nginx on any current Linux distro.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Amidst these concerns, some users are seeking memory-safe alternatives like Caddy or Jetty, though others argue that even these &amp;#34;finished&amp;#34; software models face their own unique security challenges &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139122&quot; title=&quot;Is there a good alternative to Apache and Nginx that&amp;#39;s written in a memory-safe language and not full of security holes? I briefly looked at Jetty (written in Java) and Caddy (written in Go) but they seem to have a history of vulnerabilities of other types (e.g. shell injection in Jetty) so I&amp;#39;m not sure they would be any better.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138406&quot; title=&quot;Wow, coming from the webdev world. It is so funny seeing NGINX, one of the widest used web servers in the world, on version 1.x. React is on version 19. Really shows how differently new vs. old software is designed and built, and not necessarily in a good way. https://world.hey.com/dhh/finished-software-8ee43637 https://josem.co/the-beauty-of-finished-software/&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139189&quot; title=&quot;Caddy been a breeze to use, bit sucky model with &amp;#39;we have thousands of binaries depending on what combination of plugins you want&amp;#39; instead of a proper plugin system, but if you&amp;#39;re building it from source, it&amp;#39;s pretty nifty and simple anyways.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scorch2000.com/web/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Scorched Earth 2000 – Web&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (scorch2000.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48129694&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;382 points · 147 comments · by meshko&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scorched Earth 2000 is a JavaScript and HTML port of the classic artillery game, featuring multiplayer capabilities, a weapon shop, and customizable game settings. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scorch2000.com/web/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Scorched Earth 2000 HTML Port    URL Source: http://www.scorch2000.com/web/    Published Time: Fri, 15 May 2026 01:18:50 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Scorched Earth 2000 HTML Port  Say    SCORCH 2000    System Inventory    Wind: **0**    Ammo:**999**Power:**300**Angle:**30**    +&amp;lt;-&amp;gt;    fire New Round    Round 1 out of 1    System Menu    Statistics Mass kill Multiplayer Edit profile About Scorch On-line help Leave Scorch Close this menu    Players Statistics    Player Name Kills Gain Overall Kills Overall…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on nostalgic memories of *Scorched Earth* and similar early PC titles, with many users recalling how these games served as their first introduction to &amp;#34;hacking&amp;#34; through simple file manipulation or code editing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48130413&quot; title=&quot;9 year old me got my first &amp;#39;hacking&amp;#39; experience out of this game. With the shareware version, you could not select the ultra tank that could shoot 3 bullets for a human, but you COULD if it were the computer player. The &amp;#39;hack&amp;#39;:  -start a game with a normal tank VS ultra computer player as p2.  -save the game (as a file).  -open the game file.  -read the ASCII text and just flip which player has which text. Now, I had my ultra tank.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48130821&quot; title=&quot;It would be a nice thread on here, to see what people&amp;#39;s first hacks were, especially from that era when people were usually just alone and stumbling on these things.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48130695&quot; title=&quot;Mine was on a similar game, GORILLA.BAS.  I would edit the banana code for a much bigger explosion.  Lots of fun back in computer class!&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48132407&quot; title=&quot;I &amp;#39;hacked&amp;#39; Cap&amp;#39;n Hector in Escape Velocity. The game was shareware and he&amp;#39;d show up to ask you to pay the fee. After the trial period he&amp;#39;d start lobbing missiles at you. There was a basic editor you could open to adjust all the ship stats and weapons, so while you couldn&amp;#39;t turn him friendly you could at least de-claw him. I remember thinking it was weird how &amp;#39;easy&amp;#39; it was to work around, but it&amp;#39;s hard to imagine the studio would care much: a pre-internet 14 year who loved the game that much is…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters highlight the accessibility of modifying ship stats or game files in that era, noting that developers often left these systems open, perhaps prioritizing player enjoyment over strict security &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48132407&quot; title=&quot;I &amp;#39;hacked&amp;#39; Cap&amp;#39;n Hector in Escape Velocity. The game was shareware and he&amp;#39;d show up to ask you to pay the fee. After the trial period he&amp;#39;d start lobbing missiles at you. There was a basic editor you could open to adjust all the ship stats and weapons, so while you couldn&amp;#39;t turn him friendly you could at least de-claw him. I remember thinking it was weird how &amp;#39;easy&amp;#39; it was to work around, but it&amp;#39;s hard to imagine the studio would care much: a pre-internet 14 year who loved the game that much is…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48135026&quot; title=&quot;Also, if the game is single-player, you don&amp;#39;t care: Simply let the players enjoy the game how they want to enjoy it.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The thread also traces the game&amp;#39;s evolution from its DOS origins in the early 90s to the Java applet versions common in school computer labs around the year 2000 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48129969&quot; title=&quot;I played the hell out of the original DOS game during high school in 1992 (or thereabouts, it&amp;#39;s been a while.)&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48130047&quot; title=&quot;Oh man, we played this in computer lab in high school to pass time after we were done with our assignments. I believe it was a java/flash version though (year 2000/2001)&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48130078&quot; title=&quot;yup, it was a java applet. Stopped working when Java in the browser died.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/cryptocurrency/bitcoin-trader-recovers-usd400-000-using-claude-ai-after-losing-wallet-password-11-years-ago-bot-tried-3-5-trillion-passwords-before-decrypting-an-old-wallet-backup&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bitcoin trader recovers wallet with help of Claude&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tomshardware.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48136240&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;331 points · 174 comments · by cednore&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Bitcoin trader recovered $400,000 in lost funds after using Anthropic’s Claude AI to identify an old backup file and fix a code bug in a recovery tool. The AI&amp;#39;s assistance allowed the user to successfully decrypt a wallet password they had forgotten 11 years ago. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/cryptocurrency/bitcoin-trader-recovers-usd400-000-using-claude-ai-after-losing-wallet-password-11-years-ago-bot-tried-3-5-trillion-passwords-before-decrypting-an-old-wallet-backup&quot; title=&quot;Bitcoin trader recovers $400,000 using Claude AI after getting &amp;#39;stoned&amp;#39; and losing wallet password 11 years ago — bot tried 3.5 trillion passwords before decrypting an old wallet backup    The user apparently changed the password while &amp;#39;stoned.&amp;#39;    ![](https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p/?c1=2&amp;amp;c2=10055482&amp;amp;cv=4.4.0&amp;amp;cj=1)    [Skip to main content](#main)    Unlock world-class roadmaps &amp;amp; trusted Bench data.  See More    ×    ## Unparalleled insights. Industry analysis. Insider access.    **Tom&amp;#39;s Hardware**…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users report that Claude excels at high-stakes troubleshooting, such as identifying IRS tax credit errors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48136798&quot; title=&quot;I have a similar claude story (much less money though), with the IRS R&amp;amp;D tax credit. The auditing firm initially said we qualify for $0. But then I had claude analyze past R&amp;amp;D reports and our expenses and it found the problem. The auditor had miscategorized our company. So claude drafted an email even pointing to the right Internal Revenue Code (IRS Law), and specify why we fall under a specific category. The auditor got back to me two days later admitting their mistake and said our company now…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, recovering malformed data from corrupted SD cards &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48136393&quot; title=&quot;Claude Code is really good at stuff like this. The other day I tried to recover some images from an SD card that had gone bad. I used GetDataBack to recover files, but they appeared to be malformed and didn&amp;#39;t open in image viewers. I tasked Claude to analyze the files and figure out what&amp;#39;s going on, and eventually we figured out that each file had a custom metadata header + thumbnail + actual image concatenated. I had it write a python script and was able to recover all the images with their…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, and auditing legacy codebases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48136650&quot; title=&quot;I have a friend that just picked up a new consulting job resurrecting an ancient Windows desktop application. No source control, no tests. And it&amp;#39;s spread out over a dozen different folders with names like &amp;#39;_old&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;_new&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;dates&amp;#39;. Claude&amp;#39;s doing a tremendous job in getting him to grips with what is actually happening in the application, what&amp;#39;s relevant, what&amp;#39;s not, what&amp;#39;s different. I think it&amp;#39;s literally saving him days and days at work.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that tasks like password cracking do not strictly require AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48136707&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Bitcoin trader recovers $400,000 using Claude AI after getting &amp;#39;stoned&amp;#39; and losing wallet password 11 years ago — bot tried 3.5 trillion passwords before decrypting an old wallet backup Man. I wish I had a lost wallet worth a quarter of that even, technically didn&amp;#39;t need Claude for this, just needed any password cracking software.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others emphasize that the models significantly accelerate complex problem-solving and provide a high return on investment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48136798&quot; title=&quot;I have a similar claude story (much less money though), with the IRS R&amp;amp;D tax credit. The auditing firm initially said we qualify for $0. But then I had claude analyze past R&amp;amp;D reports and our expenses and it found the problem. The auditor had miscategorized our company. So claude drafted an email even pointing to the right Internal Revenue Code (IRS Law), and specify why we fall under a specific category. The auditor got back to me two days later admitting their mistake and said our company now…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48137354&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; So now I joke that even if I have a claude max plan, I&amp;#39;ve still come out ahead financially. This is no joke; for better or worse, I see a day when I&amp;#39;m paying a lot more for this and it will be a bargain.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48136393&quot; title=&quot;Claude Code is really good at stuff like this. The other day I tried to recover some images from an SD card that had gone bad. I used GetDataBack to recover files, but they appeared to be malformed and didn&amp;#39;t open in image viewers. I tasked Claude to analyze the files and figure out what&amp;#39;s going on, and eventually we figured out that each file had a custom metadata header + thumbnail + actual image concatenated. I had it write a python script and was able to recover all the images with their…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong desire for these capabilities to transition into affordable local hardware, with some users willing to pay thousands for a &amp;#34;Claude in a box&amp;#34; to avoid subscription costs and privacy concerns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48137469&quot; title=&quot;By my estimation (guess) you won&amp;#39;t actually need to spend that much because the models are already getting a point where they don&amp;#39;t need to get a whole lot better to be extremely helpful across many domains. And it looks like those very helpful capabilities will continue to transfer to smaller models as well, as architectures and training regimes continue to refine. I can fairly easily imagine a world where the only people needing to spend a lot of money on models are those that are using them…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48137873&quot; title=&quot;All we need is something like Qwen3-coder-next but at Kimi K2.6 ability so it runs on laptop workstation hardware and we are set...soon?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48138630&quot; title=&quot;I am eagerly awaiting being able to run a strong local model. I&amp;#39;d hand Apple $5k right now for a Claude in a box. I know the cost might not be there now, just saying that is around my ideal price point. $10k might even be worth it - but i&amp;#39;m assuming that the more expensive it is the beefier it is too, which also means more electricity.. and i already run ~6 computers/servers in my house. If a power surge happens i&amp;#39;m going to go live in the woods lol.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theregister.com/ai-ml/2026/05/14/ontario-auditors-find-doctors-ai-note-takers-routinely-blow-basic-facts/5240771&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ontario auditors find doctors&amp;#39; AI note takers routinely blow basic facts&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theregister.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142188&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;311 points · 138 comments · by sohkamyung&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An audit of 20 AI medical note-taking systems approved for Ontario healthcare providers found that 60% mixed up prescribed drugs and nearly half fabricated treatment plans or patient information not discussed during consultations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theregister.com/ai-ml/2026/05/14/ontario-auditors-find-doctors-ai-note-takers-routinely-blow-basic-facts/5240771&quot; title=&quot;Title: Ontario auditors find doctors&amp;#39; AI note takers routinely blow basic facts    URL Source: https://www.theregister.com/ai-ml/2026/05/14/ontario-auditors-find-doctors-ai-note-takers-routinely-blow-basic-facts/5240771    Published Time: 2026-05-14T20:50:05.000Z    Markdown Content:  # Ontario auditors find doctors&amp;#39; AI note takers routinely blow basic facts  [Jump to main…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The use of AI note-takers in medical settings has revealed a high frequency of basic factual errors, such as mixing up prescribed drugs, though some argue this may not exceed the error rates of human practitioners &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142557&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; 60% of evaluated AI Scribe systems mixed up prescribed drugs in patient notes, auditors say Not mentioned, as far as I can see: the comparative human mistake rate. Having seen a lot of medical records, 60% sounds about normal lol.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find the technology &amp;#34;magical&amp;#34; for creative tasks, the persistence of fundamental failures in logic and unit conversion suggests that current LLM architectures may not be on a path toward true intelligence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142937&quot; title=&quot;I have generally moved from bearish to bullish on the future of current AI technology, but the continued inaccuracy with basic facts all while the models significantly improve continues to give me significant pause. As an example, creating recipes with Claude Opus based on flavor profiles and preferences feels magical, right up until the point at which it can&amp;#39;t accurately convert between tablespoons and teaspoons.  It&amp;#39;s like the point in the movie where a character is acting nearly right but…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48143084&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; we&amp;#39;re not actually on the right track to achieve real intelligence. Real intelligence means you have to say &amp;#39;I don&amp;#39;t know&amp;#39; when you don&amp;#39;t know,  or ask for help,  or even just saying you refuse to help with the subtext being you don&amp;#39;t want to appear stupid. The models could ostensibly do this when it has low confidence in it&amp;#39;s own results but they don&amp;#39;t.  What I don&amp;#39;t know if it&amp;#39;s because it would be very computationally difficult or it would harm the reputation of the companies charging a…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant technical debate over whether these models can &amp;#34;know what they don&amp;#39;t know,&amp;#34; with some arguing that output probabilities are poorly calibrated and do not reflect actual confidence or certainty &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48143594&quot; title=&quot;They do know what they don&amp;#39;t know. There&amp;#39;s a probability distribution for outputs that they are sampling from. That just isn&amp;#39;t being used for that purpose.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144799&quot; title=&quot;Common misconception. As far we know, LLMs are not calibrated, i.e. their output &amp;#39;probabilities&amp;#39; are not in fact necessarily correlated with the actual error rates, so you can&amp;#39;t use e.g. the softmax values to estimate confidence. It is why it is more accurate to talk about e.g. the model &amp;#39;logits&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;softmax values&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;simplex mapping&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;pseudo-probabilities&amp;#39;, or even more agnostically, just &amp;#39;output scores&amp;#39;, unless you actually have strong evidence of calibration. To get calibrated probabilities,…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Proposed solutions include integrating deterministic tools like calculators or providing timestamped audio links to allow for human verification of AI-generated notes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48143165&quot; title=&quot;I hate to help provide possible soultions to an entire process I don&amp;#39;t approve of, but maybe the fuzzy tools need old style deterministic tools the same way and for the same reasons we do. So instead of an LLM trying to answer a math or reason question by finding a statistical match with other similar groups of words it found on 4chan and the all in podcast and a terrible recipe for soup written by a terrible cook, it can use a calculator when it needs a calculator answer.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142705&quot; title=&quot;The AI note taker we use at work records the meeting as well, and each note it takes about the meeting has a timestamp link that takes you directly there in the recording so you can check it yourself.  While I&amp;#39;m sure a solution like this is more complicated in a HIPPAA environment, something like this is critical for things as important as healthcare.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/cyber-security/microsoft-bitlocker-protected-drives-can-now-be-opened-with-just-some-files-on-a-usb-stick-yellowkey-zero-day-exploit-demonstrates-an-apparent-backdoor&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft BitLocker – YellowKey zero-day exploit&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tomshardware.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48130519&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;279 points · 154 comments · by cookiengineer&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Security researcher Chaotic Eclipse has released &amp;#34;YellowKey,&amp;#34; a zero-day exploit that bypasses Microsoft BitLocker encryption via a USB stick, and &amp;#34;GreenPlasma,&amp;#34; a local privilege escalation vulnerability, after Microsoft allegedly dismissed previous disclosure reports. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/cyber-security/microsoft-bitlocker-protected-drives-can-now-be-opened-with-just-some-files-on-a-usb-stick-yellowkey-zero-day-exploit-demonstrates-an-apparent-backdoor&quot; title=&quot;Microsoft BitLocker-protected drives can now be opened with just some files on a USB stick — YellowKey zero-day exploit demonstrates an apparent backdoor    Also, it&amp;#39;s a twofer with the GreenPlasma zero-day local privilege escalation.    ![](https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p/?c1=2&amp;amp;c2=10055482&amp;amp;cv=4.4.0&amp;amp;cj=1)    [Skip to main content](#main)    Unlock world-class roadmaps &amp;amp; trusted Bench data.  See More    ×    ## Unparalleled insights. Industry analysis. Insider access.    **Tom&amp;#39;s Hardware** Premium equips…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The YellowKey zero-day exploit highlights a critical vulnerability in BitLocker where the Windows Recovery Environment can potentially trigger the TPM to release decryption keys without proper authorization &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48131952&quot; title=&quot;There are two ways to &amp;#39;use a PIN&amp;#39;. Since there&amp;#39;s a ton of misunderstanding in this thread, I&amp;#39;m going to go into how disk encryption works conceptually. First, there&amp;#39;s a symmetric key to encrypt blocks on the disk. Since you want to be able to change your unlocking password/mechanism without re-encrypting everything on the disk, this has nothing to do with unlocking the disk. This is what you want to get BY unlocking the disk. Let&amp;#39;s call this the &amp;#39;data encryption key&amp;#39;. Then, there&amp;#39;s something…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that using a PIN should mitigate this, the exploit&amp;#39;s author claims to have a bypass for TPM+PIN configurations, leading to intense debate over whether this indicates a deliberate backdoor or a fundamental design flaw in how Microsoft handles key derivation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48131373&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Mitigation: Use Bitlocker with a PIN. &amp;gt; (Note: The YellowKey author disagrees that PIN is a protection&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48131550&quot; title=&quot;That’s the most puzzling part to me. What’s the point of the PIN then? I was assuming it was mixed with the TPM secret somehow but if it can be bypassed then it shows it just an IF statement somewhere. Dang… God I hate this stupid design of burying the decryption key in the TPM and hoping the software does not get fooled to reveal it. Microsoft always sucks. Why don’t you ask for the password at boot time and derive the key from it. So much simpler and makes this kind of attacks impossible.…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48131563&quot; title=&quot;the only way to bypass PIN would be an actual backdoor in Bitlocker. no way around that. an actual backdoor in microsoft encryption was never documented, and there are Snowden documents showing FBI pressing Microsoft into introducing one and Microsoft refusing so I call bullshit on the PIN bypass&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics point to Microsoft’s history of silent patching and failure to credit researchers as evidence of poor security culture, while others maintain that such vulnerabilities are often the result of complex trade-offs between security and administrative recovery features &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48130798&quot; title=&quot;The BitLocker exploit seems simple and very dangerous. Companies and individuals have been relying on BitLocker to protect information if the device is lost. Despite promises, Microsoft doesn’t seem to be serious about security. What will it take for more companies to truly understand their risks with Windows and being locked into Microsoft’s platforms?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48131538&quot; title=&quot;Note that RedSun and Bluehammer were silently patched, with no response to the CVEs by Microsoft, and not accrediting the researcher&amp;#39;s work. That&amp;#39;s what this is about. Microsoft doing bad security practices while trying to get away with it, leading to this outcome. The researcher also claims to have another version ready which allows to also bypass TPM+PIN via a similar backdoor, which I&amp;#39;m inclined to believe. Why do I believe that? 5 ring 0 zero days within 3 months are so statistically…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48131952&quot; title=&quot;There are two ways to &amp;#39;use a PIN&amp;#39;. Since there&amp;#39;s a ton of misunderstanding in this thread, I&amp;#39;m going to go into how disk encryption works conceptually. First, there&amp;#39;s a symmetric key to encrypt blocks on the disk. Since you want to be able to change your unlocking password/mechanism without re-encrypting everything on the disk, this has nothing to do with unlocking the disk. This is what you want to get BY unlocking the disk. Let&amp;#39;s call this the &amp;#39;data encryption key&amp;#39;. Then, there&amp;#39;s something…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.agweb.com/news/usda-projects-smallest-us-wheat-harvest-1972-due-plains-drought&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;USDA Projects Smallest US Wheat Harvest Since 1972 Due to Plains Drought&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (agweb.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48134993&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;254 points · 177 comments · by littlexsparkee&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The USDA projects the smallest U.S. wheat harvest since 1972 due to a severe drought in the Plains, while soybean production is expected to reach near-record levels as farmers navigate rising fertilizer costs and trade tensions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.agweb.com/news/usda-projects-smallest-us-wheat-harvest-1972-due-plains-drought&quot; title=&quot;Title: USDA Projects Smallest US Wheat Harvest Since 1972 Due to Plains Drought - AgWeb    URL Source: https://www.agweb.com/news/usda-projects-smallest-us-wheat-harvest-1972-due-plains-drought    Published Time: 2026-05-12T17:43:23.778Z    Markdown Content:  # USDA Projects Smallest US Wheat Harvest Since 1972 Due to Plains Drought - AgWeb    *   [Markets News](https://www.agweb.com/markets)    *   [Magazines](https://www.agweb.com/magazines)    *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the headline attributes the small wheat harvest to drought, commenters highlight that farmers are intentionally shifting to soybeans because they require less expensive fertilizer &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48135226&quot; title=&quot;Title claims &amp;#39;due to plains drought&amp;#39; but the article text largely attributes this to increased planting of soy for its lower fertilizer requirements (related to Strait of Hormuz).&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48135221&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; growers expanded plantings of soybeans, which require less fertilizer than grains like corn and wheat It&amp;#39;s not the drought per se, it&amp;#39;s input costs. Farmers are favouring crops that need less nitrogen and potassium. Commodities have responded accordingly.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. This shift has led to record soybean production, though debate exists regarding whether these crops—primarily used for animal feed, oil, and biofuel—are a suitable direct replacement for human food consumption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48135324&quot; title=&quot;You can eat soybeans, though, which are seeing record production thanks to it supplanting what is affectionately known in agriculture circles as poverty grass.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48135490&quot; title=&quot;Perhaps someone in the industry can chime in, but I had read that the soybeans that the US primarily grows and previously sold to China were used for pig feed.  In my mind I pictured it like &amp;#39;cow corn&amp;#39; -- humans technically can eat it, but it&amp;#39;s chewy and not very good. Are there different grades of soybean?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48135576&quot; title=&quot;There are different grades with different properties.  However very few are consumed by humans.  When sold for humans it is called edamame. The most common use is crush the beans, and collect the oil feeding the rest to pigs. If you read the ingredients at the grocery store, soy bean oil comes up a lot.  Soy bean oil is also often used in diesel engines after processing.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Long-term concerns include the depletion of regional aquifers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48135175&quot; title=&quot;It will only get worse for the next generation as the aquafers are continuing to be depleted.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; and the impact of shifting international trade relations on crop demand &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48135247&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; growers expanded plantings of soybeans A year ago China stopped buying soybeans from the US is seems (&amp;#39;China Bought $12.6 Billion in U.S. Soybeans Last Year. Now, It’s $0.&amp;#39; - https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/25/business/china-soybean-sa... ), was that resumed, or who are all these new soybeans going to? Is it all for national use instead of export?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.vt.edu/articles/2026/05/drought-united-states-la-nina-expert.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;More than sixty percent of the United States is experiencing drought conditions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (news.vt.edu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142193&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;252 points · 98 comments · by littlexsparkee&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More than 60 percent of the United States is currently experiencing drought conditions, with experts citing an atypical La Niña and climate warming as primary drivers. While Colorado and the Southeast are most severely impacted, relief may not arrive until a potential El Niño event next fall. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.vt.edu/articles/2026/05/drought-united-states-la-nina-expert.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Expert: More than half of U.S. faces worst drought in decades    URL Source: https://news.vt.edu/articles/2026/05/drought-united-states-la-nina-expert.html    Published Time: Sun, 17 May 2026 14:04:36 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Expert: More than half of U.S. faces worst drought in decades | Virginia Tech News | Virginia Tech    *   [Skip to main content](https://news.vt.edu/articles/2026/05/drought-united-states-la-nina-expert.html#vt_main)  *   [Skip to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the validity of current drought data, with some users arguing that wheat futures confirm the crisis &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48143148&quot; title=&quot;Some odd comments on this. It&amp;#39;s not a matter of debate, wheat futures reflect this.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; while others contend the U.S. Drought Monitor is a subjective, non-statistical tool prone to inaccuracies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142635&quot; title=&quot;The drought map used here is partly subjective opinion. https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/About/WhatistheUSDM.aspx &amp;gt; Who draws the map? &amp;gt; Meteorologists and climatologists from the NDMC, NOAA and USDA take turns as the lead author of the map, usually two weeks a time. The author’s job is to do something that a computer can’t. When the data is pointing in different directions, they make sense out of it. &amp;gt; How do we know when we&amp;#39;re in a drought? &amp;gt; No single piece of evidence tells the full story,…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48142740&quot; title=&quot;Doesn&amp;#39;t seem like all climate scientists are fans of it either. From a 2022 critique of a news story also based on this map: https://cliffmass.blogspot.com/2022/04/is-large-portion-of-w... &amp;gt; The essential message is that weather and climate data do not support the claims of extreme or severe drought in eastern Washington this year. &amp;gt; There is no expectation of water problems over or near the Columbia Basin. The Drought Monitor graphics, which are created subjectively, are sufficiently…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters note that while current conditions are severe, the transition to a &amp;#34;super El Niño&amp;#34; could rapidly flip the script from drought to extreme flooding and humidity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144058&quot; title=&quot;I read this article. Thanks for that link. I think it odd that they are focusing on drought conditions due to the La Nina conditions we have experienced when we are ramping up now for what has been described as a super El Nino. For much of the areas affected by the drought conditions, there will be an overabundance of precipitation by late summer into next spring. The article mentions the potential for a super El Nino at the very end but doesn&amp;#39;t discuss the effect it could have on content in…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48144984&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s worth keeping in mind the danger of such a transition though. If you go from a drought to a lot of water it generally builds up pretty badly as dried out dirt doesn&amp;#39;t absorb water very well. If the prediction holds true it may become a year with a lot of water damage/flooding in these regions. Let&amp;#39;s hope for the best though.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48145202&quot; title=&quot;I agree that we should hope for the best. We should prepare for the worst too since the updated models are indicating that the super El Nino event is very likely. People across the region that will be affected can expect an unusually wet and hot end to the year. We have time to prepare. There won&amp;#39;t be much we can do about soil absorption since keeping your yard watered will also cause runoff if the soil is saturated. We just need to follow the common sense guidance to avoid driving into flooded…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the thread reflects a meta-discussion regarding shifting community dynamics and the presence of &amp;#34;techno-fascist&amp;#34; ideologies on the platform &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48143153&quot; title=&quot;Some odd comments and voting patterns on a lot of things.  It&amp;#39;s getting weird around here.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48143413&quot; title=&quot;Well, it&amp;#39;s a weird site.  Most of my interactions are through the /active page or specific search terms.  When I started to do that in about 2021 it certainly made it a lot easier to find what I as curious about. Unfortunately, what I wanted to know also changed, in that I now use the site to keep tabs on the thoughts of folks are or who fund and work for hard-right technocrats. There are, of course, many other folks on the site. At the same time, the US techno-fascists  both have an outsized…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48143653&quot; title=&quot;I’m not sure I understood you correctly. You think critics of Thiel are the techno fascists?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/sam-altmans-business-dealings-under-gop-scrutiny-ahead-of-openais-ipo-52c1cc4d&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sam Altman&amp;#39;s Business Dealings Under GOP Scrutiny Ahead of OpenAI&amp;#39;s IPO&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (wsj.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48134429&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;195 points · 154 comments · by 1vuio0pswjnm7&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/sam-altmans-business-dealings-under-gop-scrutiny-ahead-of-openais-ipo-52c1cc4d&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The investigation into Sam Altman’s business dealings is viewed by some as a potential proxy battle fueled by Elon Musk&amp;#39;s legal pressure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48135142&quot; title=&quot;I can&amp;#39;t help but think that this is due to Musk putting pressure on the current administration to help him win his lawsuit and punish Altman.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48135235&quot; title=&quot;Personal vendettas between the world&amp;#39;s most powerful psychopaths playing out in the stock market while everyone else suffers does seem like the current meta. So it makes sense.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, though others argue the scrutiny is a necessary response to &amp;#34;shady&amp;#34; financial arrangements involving the redirection of non-profit funds into for-profit ventures where Altman holds personal stakes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48135919&quot; title=&quot;The thesis is as follows: OpenAI receives funds as a non-profit. Some of those funds are redirected to for profit ventures. Critically, the GM (Altman) of the nonprofit owns shares of the for-profit ventures, that OpenAI funds were redirected into. A regular company could and does invest in any company even when there&amp;#39;s a conflict, as long as the conflict is disclosed and the Board votes in favor of it. There&amp;#39;s no criminal element there. The problem is introduced in Altman&amp;#39;s case if (a) there…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48135992&quot; title=&quot;Doesn&amp;#39;t Sam Altman famously not own OpenAI?  His whole arrangement is so shady.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While critics label the situation a clash between &amp;#34;psychopaths&amp;#34; that harms the public &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48135235&quot; title=&quot;Personal vendettas between the world&amp;#39;s most powerful psychopaths playing out in the stock market while everyone else suffers does seem like the current meta. So it makes sense.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48136060&quot; title=&quot;God why do people frame things in such extremes? Neither person is a psychopath. If anyone is closer to a psychopath it’s Altman, but he doesn’t completely fit the monicker.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, some users defend the status quo by noting that consumers currently benefit from &amp;#34;subsidized compute&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48135692&quot; title=&quot;How does everyone else suffer? We’re getting subsidized compute.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Debate persists over whether Altman is a &amp;#34;Machiavellian tech baron&amp;#34; or simply a political figure who uses placation and cagey tactics to navigate complex corporate conflicts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48136113&quot; title=&quot;Is there a more benign explanation for these things? Altman is undeniably famously cagey and political but despite most of the tech and non-tech worlds at this point seeing him as some kind of con artist, I still kind of want to try to believe he&amp;#39;s not. No doubt some of OpenAI&amp;#39;s founding principles like &amp;#39;stop + assist if a competitor gets to AGI first&amp;#39; are likely flying out the window, perhaps in part due to him and also as one might anticipate of initial lofty ideals and promises, but even…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48136060&quot; title=&quot;God why do people frame things in such extremes? Neither person is a psychopath. If anyone is closer to a psychopath it’s Altman, but he doesn’t completely fit the monicker.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-13</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-13</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://monokai.com/articles/how-i-moved-my-digital-stack-to-europe/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I moved my digital stack to Europe&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (monokai.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48120629&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1034 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 608 comments · by monokai_nl&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To achieve greater digital sovereignty, a developer migrated their primary infrastructure from US-based services to European alternatives like Matomo, Proton, and Scaleway, finding the transition manageable despite some functional trade-offs and a few remaining exceptions like Cloudflare and Stripe. &lt;a href=&quot;https://monokai.com/articles/how-i-moved-my-digital-stack-to-europe/&quot; title=&quot;Title: How I Moved My Digital Stack to Europe    URL Source: https://monokai.com/articles/how-i-moved-my-digital-stack-to-europe/    Published Time: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 12:28:35 GMT    Markdown Content:  # How I Moved My Digital Stack to Europe — Monokai    *   [home](https://monokai.com/)  *   [artworks](https://monokai.com/artworks/)  *   [photos](https://monokai.com/photos/)  *   [about](https://monokai.com/about/)    # How I Moved My Digital Stack to Europe    ## On digital sovereignty, and why European cloud…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a strong consensus that European organizations are rapidly shifting toward local hosting to ensure data sovereignty, a trend that has accelerated significantly in the last year &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48120945&quot; title=&quot;For the past days I&amp;#39;ve been participating(albeit over Teams) in a conference relevant to my industry (intel), basically startups and established companies showcasing their products to a closed audience of EU gov. officials. One thing I noticed right away, is that all companies were asked &amp;#39;Can we fully host this from within EU or our country&amp;#39; from the various people in audience. Every single one. Many of the startups had slides prepared for this. Definitely a change, because it is not something…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48121441&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Definitely a change, because it is not something I can recall being important just a couple of years ago. I work as a consultant and freelancer across a bunch of companies, some American but mostly European ones. Last ~8 months or so, the sentiment about &amp;#39;Hosting our data in EU or even our own country&amp;#39; has drastically changed, I don&amp;#39;t think I&amp;#39;ve seen such a clear shift in public opinion so fast before. The amount of migrations I&amp;#39;ve helped moving data from US to EU already is higher this…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48121150&quot; title=&quot;It started 10 years ago, but have def escalated the last year IMHO. Im sorry to say it, but i feel a lot of Europeans have lost a good deal of trust in the US.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this focus on GDPR and regional residency has been building for a decade, others attribute the recent urgency to a decline in trust toward U.S. political stability and the potential for trade or security disruptions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48121033&quot; title=&quot;This is not a change. It has been asked since the advent of GDPR. So nearly 10 years.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48121150&quot; title=&quot;It started 10 years ago, but have def escalated the last year IMHO. Im sorry to say it, but i feel a lot of Europeans have lost a good deal of trust in the US.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48121917&quot; title=&quot;Trump 2 is worse than Trump 1 by far from EU perspective. And it also proved that it wasn&amp;#39;t a once-off that Americans will vote in someone who threatens to dismantle NATO, invade Greenland, or start trade wars with allies for no reason.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics point out that moving data to Europe may not actually improve security against U.S. intelligence agencies, which face fewer legal restrictions when operating on foreign soil &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123511&quot; title=&quot;Which is just wildly backwards. It is the same mindset of the cyberpunk &amp;#39;privacy advocates&amp;#39; of the early 2000s, move your stuff to Sealand or Switzerland. The fundamental flaw with this plan is if your fear is genuinely of the United States, your data is far more protected inside the US. The intelligence community has no restrictions operating on foreign networks and servers. Rather than go to a FISA court for approval, we just hack your box and take your data. Or ask a European intelligence…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, and note that the EU&amp;#39;s own regulatory environment can be burdensome for hobbyists or restrictive regarding privacy tools like VPNs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48120761&quot; title=&quot;While I agree with him that the US is becoming more unpredictable, I don&amp;#39;t think the EU is much better, especially with regards to digital things where they can be worse in some ways. For example, they are discussing restricting VPN access for &amp;#39;child protection&amp;#39;[1] [1] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_AT...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48120868&quot; title=&quot;Most digital things in Europe are in fact much better. Lots of laws allow people to protect themselves from digital exploitation. I agree that there is a ton of bullshit as well though. Gotta dox myself with imprints for example, so I cant share my work with people without also doxing myself. Also as a hobbyist you pretty much need all the business documents as well, like a privacy policy even if its just a small public app on the playstore. Also gotta make sure that data of European citizens…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dailyprincetonian.com/article/2026/05/princeton-news-adpol-proctoring-in-person-examinations-passed-faculty-133-years-precedent&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Princeton mandates proctoring for in-person exams, upending 133 year precedent&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (dailyprincetonian.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48126848&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;389 points · &lt;strong&gt;614 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by bookofjoe&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Princeton faculty have voted to mandate proctoring for all in-person exams starting July 1, 2026, ending a 133-year-old tradition of unmonitored testing in response to rising concerns over generative AI and academic integrity violations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dailyprincetonian.com/article/2026/05/princeton-news-adpol-proctoring-in-person-examinations-passed-faculty-133-years-precedent&quot; title=&quot;Title: Princeton faculty mandate proctoring for in-person exams, upending 133 years of precedent    URL Source: https://www.dailyprincetonian.com/article/2026/05/princeton-news-adpol-proctoring-in-person-examinations-passed-faculty-133-years-precedent    Markdown Content:  # Princeton faculty mandate proctoring for in-person exams, upending 133 years of precedent - The Princetonian    ![Image 4:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The shift from an honor system to proctored exams is viewed by some as a necessary response to a &amp;#34;low-trust society&amp;#34; where nearly a third of students admit to cheating &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48127118&quot; title=&quot;huh, i had no idea princeton specifically disallowed proctors, and instead relied on an honor system. seems... like a poorly thought out system, especially given: &amp;#39; 29.9 percent of respondents reported that they had cheated on an assignment or exam during their time at Princeton. 44.6 percent of senior respondents reported knowledge of Honor Code violations that they chose not to report. &amp;#39; crazier is the people protesting by saying: “students should behave honorably, and that faculty and…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48129216&quot; title=&quot;People blame AI but in reality it&amp;#39;s more about America transitioning from a high-trust society to a low-trust one.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some alumni recall the system fostering a unique sense of community and moral reckoning &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48127208&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; What on earth could be the objection to proctoring? There is a unique pride in being part of a community built around honor. You see this on the Swiss metro and in small-town vegetable stalls. Unproctored exams force every student to weigh the value of their honor against a better grade. That&amp;#39;s a personal moral reckoning that might be worth the entire degree.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48127356&quot; title=&quot;As someone who went there (albeit many decades ago) I can tell you FWIW when I was there folks took it seriously. I literally knew of no one who ever cheated on an exam. And I&amp;#39;m pretty sure that anyone I knew who observed cheating would have taken it seriously enough to bring it to the process. It was pretty much a fixture of how students thought about things. So it worked (near as I could tell) back then. But institutions take awhile to adjust to new realities, and it while looks like…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue it was often a &amp;#34;charade&amp;#34; or a &amp;#34;propaganda&amp;#34; tool used to mask sadistic workloads &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48127408&quot; title=&quot;That’s just the propaganda they sell during college visits. When I was at Caltech the honor code didn’t inspire any pride, because the only way anyone got through that course load was by “cheating”*. No one had any time for pride (GO BEAVERS!) An honor code is an admission that your curriculum is so sadistic, not even cheating will help. Princeton just isn’t prestigious enough to keep up that charade. * At Caltech the line between collaboration and cheating was whether you listed your…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Anecdotes from former staff highlight the system&amp;#39;s failures, such as students escaping punishment despite clear evidence of fraud, leading to deep cynicism regarding the Honor Committee&amp;#39;s effectiveness &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48129890&quot; title=&quot;I was a grad student @ Princeton a handful of decades ago. I was a TA for a few classes and, given the honor code, we did not proctor the exams for undergrads. We just handed them out (left the room) and returned to collect them at the end. - One of the exams in a course that I TAed had 5 free-response questions. - There were also 5 TAs in that class, so we un-stapled the exams and each TA graded one question (for consistency). - We re-assembled the exams and returned them to the students. - A…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48127246&quot; title=&quot;The fish rots from the head. It&amp;#39;s a sucker&amp;#39;s game to aspire to selflessly serve the greater good when the most powerful people in the land are brazenly corrupt pedophiles. In other words: monkey see, monkey do.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jorijn.com/en/blog/leaving-github-for-forgejo/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Leaving GitHub for Forgejo&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jorijn.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48121266&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;631 points · 343 comments · by jorijn&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Following the Dutch government&amp;#39;s lead, developer Jorijn Schrijvershof is migrating from GitHub to self-hosted Forgejo to ensure digital autonomy and avoid Microsoft’s AI-driven data training defaults, frequent outages, and US jurisdictional privacy risks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jorijn.com/en/blog/leaving-github-for-forgejo/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Why I&amp;#39;m leaving GitHub for Forgejo    URL Source: https://jorijn.com/en/blog/leaving-github-for-forgejo/    Published Time: 2026-05-08T00:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  # Why I&amp;#39;m leaving GitHub for Forgejo | Jorijn Schrijvershof    [Skip to content](https://jorijn.com/en/blog/leaving-github-for-forgejo/#page-title)- [x]      Expand the menu      [Jorijn Schrijvershof](https://jorijn.com/en/)  ## Primary navigation    *   [About](https://jorijn.com/en/about/)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The migration from GitHub to alternatives like Forgejo is largely driven by a desire to reclaim Git’s decentralized roots and a refusal to provide free training data for AI scrapers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48121439&quot; title=&quot;Everyone seems to be leaving GitHub, and forgetting the entire spirit of what git is in my eyes. Git was always meant to be decentralized, the problem here is that all the tooling around git was centralized to GitHub because it was a cleaner experience, they scaled nicely, and were properly maintained. I would prefer to still see mirrors on GitHub that are auto-synched because I&amp;#39;ve seen projects for years either self-host or go somewhere niche, then the GitHub mirror dies or is removed, and…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48121536&quot; title=&quot;While I&amp;#39;m not forgetting the spirit of what Git is, I&amp;#39;m also remembering how GitHub used &amp;#39;all open repositories&amp;#39; to train their first Copilot without telling anyone. So, no thanks. I&amp;#39;ll not be committing any personal code there anymore. And no, I don&amp;#39;t care for the social aspects either. Discoverability, stars, and AI bot powered issue bombardment. I&amp;#39;m fine like this. Also, remember, &amp;#39;Open Source is not about You&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48121752&quot; title=&quot;I have also moved my git repositories to a self-hosted NUC. I have not yet bothered with a HTTP frontend to share it with the world, mostly because I don&amp;#39;t want to provide AI scrapers with content and don&amp;#39;t want to put the work in to block them. It&amp;#39;s a shame that all these companies that benefited from open source have poisoned the industry like this&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that GitHub’s social features and identity verification are its true value, others contend that &amp;#34;pure&amp;#34; open source has become corporate welfare for hyperscalers, suggesting a shift toward more restrictive licenses &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48121851&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s a shame that all these companies that benefited from open source have poisoned the industry like this Open Source and the OSI are an industry plant. Look at who sponsors it. The monopoly hyperscaler conglomerates get free labor and use it to build the world we despise: tracking panopticons, phones we can&amp;#39;t install things on, device attestation, browser monoculture with no adblock, etc. etc. Google made people fall in love with BSD/MIT, and look what it did. Just a few of the classic…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48121482&quot; title=&quot;Yes, but GitHub is more than just git. The most important aspect of the platform that everybody seems to forget is the social component and how easy it made to create a persistent, off-site repository and collaborate across repos.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48121976&quot; title=&quot;GitHub centralizes 2 things: Authentication, as well as Repository Hosting. Does the code really need to be hosted in a central location like this? (Clearly not, which is why people are leaving GitHub in the first place) But the one part GitHub provides that&amp;#39;s genuinely valuable is the social aspect, and when you get a PR from a user named torvalds you can trust that this is in fact Linus. This isn&amp;#39;t the case with more distributed systems. That&amp;#39;s why I&amp;#39;d really like to see some entity handle…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the push for decentralization, skeptics note that users often just seek a &amp;#34;new center&amp;#34; to pioneer, while Forgejo works to bridge this gap by using open protocols to link independent forges &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48121603&quot; title=&quot;People constantly cry out for decentralization.  In reality, however, most systems eventually end up centralized.  Perhaps when people ask for decentralization, they are actually seeking a new center where they can become the new pioneers.  It seems that when they feel they have no chance of winning under the existing rules, they use decentralization as a pretext to overturn the board.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48121479&quot; title=&quot;Forgejo is doing a lot of work to make the tooling decentralized, too.  They are using open protocols and standards to link self hosted forges together.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.spacex.com/updates#starship-v3&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Starship V3&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (spacex.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48116781&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;325 points · &lt;strong&gt;632 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by fprog&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SpaceX has unveiled Starship V3, a redesigned architecture featuring upgraded Raptor 3 engines, enhanced avionics, and a new launch pad to support rapid reusability, in-space propellant transfer, and ambitious missions to the Moon and Mars, including the deployment of massive orbital AI data centers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.spacex.com/updates#starship-v3&quot; title=&quot;Title: SpaceX    URL Source: https://www.spacex.com/updates    Published Time: Tue, 12 May 2026 20:57:39 GMT    Markdown Content:  The third generation of Starship and Super Heavy, powered by Raptor 3 and launching from an entirely new launch pad, incorporate learnings from years of flight testing and development.    The Super Heavy V3 booster features several significant upgrades. The number of grid fins has been reduced from four to three, with each fin now 50% larger and significantly stronger. These…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The proposal for space-based AI data centers has sparked a divide between those who view it as a &amp;#34;sci-fi&amp;#34; distraction or a cover for other activities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48119317&quot; title=&quot;He again mentions data center in space. He has to be the biggest richest idiot on the planet. It should be a lot cheaper to just buy massive solar (wait, couldn&amp;#39;t he just make them himself with his tesla roofs?) and batteries (which Tesla also makes) and put Datacenter in some dessert and put fiber to that place... But it seems he needs some angle to push all this necessary investment into something? Are we now in the phase of &amp;#39;lets play scifi&amp;#39; just because we can&amp;#39;t come up with anything else?…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48117492&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m basically assuming that &amp;#39;space-based data centers&amp;#39; are some Glomar Explorer-style cover for something else.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt; and those who believe it is a logical progression for scaling compute beyond the constraints of Earth&amp;#39;s biosphere &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48117759&quot; title=&quot;Beyond aggressively optimistic timelines, I find it difficult to disagree with the premise. The aggressively optimistic timelines is also what makes it feasible to even attempt these things, where e.g. the amount of iteration required for Starship would have broken most other companies. &amp;gt; In the long term, space-based AI is obviously the only way to scale. In the long term - all mass and energy available is outside of Earth - what is here is not even a rounding error. If you wish to continue…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48119545&quot; title=&quot;I dunno if it&amp;#39;s that clear cut. In space with a shadowless orbit you get 5x more solar energy per day than the sunniest place on earth. And it&amp;#39;s always on, so you don&amp;#39;t need batteries. Also, the lack of gravity and weather means that the structures can be a lot more brittle - I imagine something like a gpu on the back of a large thin film solar panel, where the panel also acts as heatsink. Could be pretty cheap!&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents argue that space offers 24/7 solar energy without the need for batteries and bypasses terrestrial &amp;#34;NIMBY&amp;#34; regulatory hurdles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48119545&quot; title=&quot;I dunno if it&amp;#39;s that clear cut. In space with a shadowless orbit you get 5x more solar energy per day than the sunniest place on earth. And it&amp;#39;s always on, so you don&amp;#39;t need batteries. Also, the lack of gravity and weather means that the structures can be a lot more brittle - I imagine something like a gpu on the back of a large thin film solar panel, where the panel also acts as heatsink. Could be pretty cheap!&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48117689&quot; title=&quot;Honestly, I think he&amp;#39;s spot on, and I normally am not fond of Elon&amp;#39;s public behavior.  I mentioned in another thread that they&amp;#39;re getting around having to ask permission to build datacenters by doing it in space.  The entire thing is to avoid NIMBY stuff I&amp;#39;d bet.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, while critics contend that building massive solar and battery arrays on Earth remains far more cost-effective &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48119317&quot; title=&quot;He again mentions data center in space. He has to be the biggest richest idiot on the planet. It should be a lot cheaper to just buy massive solar (wait, couldn&amp;#39;t he just make them himself with his tesla roofs?) and batteries (which Tesla also makes) and put Datacenter in some dessert and put fiber to that place... But it seems he needs some angle to push all this necessary investment into something? Are we now in the phase of &amp;#39;lets play scifi&amp;#39; just because we can&amp;#39;t come up with anything else?…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Amidst these technical debates, some users express fatigue, noting that Elon Musk’s personal antics and the politicization of his ventures have made it difficult to remain excited about otherwise significant engineering milestones &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48117356&quot; title=&quot;Gotta pump that Grok IPO /s Seriously though, the whole SpaceXAI makes zero sense to me. SpaceX was a wonderful company and there was zero need to pollute it with Twitter and a service that creates sexual images of people without their consent.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48117354&quot; title=&quot;I used to follow Starship so intently, similarly NASA things, but Musk&amp;#39;s antics, politicising of everything he touches, the increasing use of NASA as US propaganda, has all really put me off it. It&amp;#39;s hard to get excited about these things anymore, which is sad because they&amp;#39;re otherwise legitimately exciting.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://avkcode.github.io/blog/us-winning-ai-race.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The US is winning the AI race where it matters most: commercialization&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (avkcode.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48121929&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;240 points · &lt;strong&gt;675 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by akrylov&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The United States is leading the global AI race by dominating commercialization, cloud infrastructure, and data platforms, outpacing China’s focus on supply chain autonomy and Europe’s lack of integrated hardware and software ecosystems. &lt;a href=&quot;https://avkcode.github.io/blog/us-winning-ai-race.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: The US Is Winning the AI Race    URL Source: https://avkcode.github.io/blog/us-winning-ai-race.html    Published Time: Wed, 13 May 2026 13:56:06 GMT    Markdown Content:  The US is winning the AI race where it matters most: commercialization. Since DeepSeek R1 shocked the market in January 2025, American companies have moved faster. OpenAI pushed harder into agents and Codex. Anthropic turned Claude Code into a business. China has contenders, but the US is clearly ahead in revenue, adoption,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the US currently leads in frontier model development and commercialization &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48122364&quot; title=&quot;Anthropic, OpenAI and Google are the standouts, but the main question for me is, why is this a war? In their own context China has greatly benefitted from this. They shored up their gpu design and manufacturing expertise. If this really is a war, trump is kneecapping the country with his lawlessness and eroding America’s good will. If the world cannot trust China with their data and they cannot trust the U.S. to provide good reliable service and not turn it into a mafia style negotiation, then…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48122233&quot; title=&quot;Article title: “The US is winning the AI Race” Article content: “The US are capitalizing on AI the best” A lot of assumptions there that no one can actually verify as true right now. If commercialization into rent-seeking SaaS landscapes is the endgame, then yeah, the US is winning the AI race. If individualization, local LLMs, and consumer hardware are the endgame, China is winning the AI race. If it’s something entirely different - if LLMs are the wall and research is what grants the next…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, commenters debate whether this &amp;#34;race&amp;#34; is a zero-sum war driven by the theoretical pursuit of AGI or a geopolitical struggle over Taiwan and trade &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124645&quot; title=&quot;There isn&amp;#39;t a war today.  However China wants Taiwan: war is future option they preparing for - they might or might not go to war but they are clearly preparing.  The US is likely to get involved in such a war and I would expect Europe to join in as well. Don&amp;#39;t ask me what Trump is doing though.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48125594&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; the main question for me is, why is this a war? It&amp;#39;s a war because the hinted promise behind the hype that the first organization to reach some as-yet-entirely-theoretical AGI that can bootstrap itself to godlike capabilities will then Install Planetary Overlord* and rule the world as near-deities themselves, with the rest of the (surviving) human race as their slaves. I think it&amp;#39;s a nonsensical idea, but that&amp;#39;s the relevant driver. * Coined by SF auther Charles Stross in The Jennifer Morgue…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123174&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a war in the sense that there&amp;#39;s a concern that eventually you hit a singularity and can outsmart others in ways not constrained by human scales. If you make better guns, you&amp;#39;re still limited by how many people can carry them. You can&amp;#39;t conquer the world just like this. But if someone invents super intelligence, they can dominate new AI research, control global economies, fight much better, and all very quickly.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue the US lead is fragile, noting that China&amp;#39;s focus on efficient local LLMs and open-source models may be more sustainable than expensive, rent-seeking SaaS models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48122233&quot; title=&quot;Article title: “The US is winning the AI Race” Article content: “The US are capitalizing on AI the best” A lot of assumptions there that no one can actually verify as true right now. If commercialization into rent-seeking SaaS landscapes is the endgame, then yeah, the US is winning the AI race. If individualization, local LLMs, and consumer hardware are the endgame, China is winning the AI race. If it’s something entirely different - if LLMs are the wall and research is what grants the next…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124577&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; China is pursuing these because they cannot compete on the frontier. ? Claude, ChatGPT, etc are heinously expensive for tiny benefits lmao. Local + efficient is clearly the future&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48122516&quot; title=&quot;No, the US is _leading_ the AI race, but the race isn&amp;#39;t over. What&amp;#39;s the point of leading the race for 90% of it, if they&amp;#39;re gonna slip on their own sweat and fall down by the end? In non metaphorical terms, what&amp;#39;s the point of spending billions of dollars rushing to get the best AI tech at all costs, when the competition can distil your progress and catch up in 6-12 months while only spending 1% of what you spent. Even in the aspect the article cares about, commercialization, the US is…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant disagreement over whether China’s strategy is a forced reaction to being unable to compete on the frontier &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48122387&quot; title=&quot;That seems like a lot of rationalization to me. China is pursuing these because they cannot compete on the frontier. Yes, there is a possibility that all that compute is not needed, but it is a rather remote possibility, and there is no doubt that, given the choice, China would be pursuing frontier model building with closed, propietary-only offerings.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; or a superior long-term play as competitors distill US progress at a fraction of the cost &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48122516&quot; title=&quot;No, the US is _leading_ the AI race, but the race isn&amp;#39;t over. What&amp;#39;s the point of leading the race for 90% of it, if they&amp;#39;re gonna slip on their own sweat and fall down by the end? In non metaphorical terms, what&amp;#39;s the point of spending billions of dollars rushing to get the best AI tech at all costs, when the competition can distil your progress and catch up in 6-12 months while only spending 1% of what you spent. Even in the aspect the article cares about, commercialization, the US is…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fredchan.org/blog/locality-domains-guide/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Setting up a free *.city.state.us locality domain (2025)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (fredchan.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48122635&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;616 points · 218 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;U.S. citizens and organizations can register free locality domains (e.g., `name.city.state.us`) by obtaining nameservers through Amazon Lightsail and submitting a specific registration template to the delegated manager of their local area. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fredchan.org/blog/locality-domains-guide/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Setting up a free *.city.state.us locality domain    URL Source: https://fredchan.org/blog/locality-domains-guide/    Published Time: Wed, 06 May 2026 04:13:47 GMT    Markdown Content:  ## tl;dr    In the US, can get a domain name like `somename.city.state.us` for free. If your town has its own domain, you can get nameservers from Amazon Lightsail, send the _Interim .US Domain Template_ to the delegated manager for your locality to register one, then point DNS entries at your webhost.    ## What’s…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the hierarchical structure of locality domains (e.g., `*.city.state.us`) is praised for its logic and historical roots in the non-commercial vision of internet pioneers like Jon Postel, it faces significant modern friction due to bureaucratic hurdles and the lack of WHOIS privacy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124814&quot; title=&quot;Having a domain under the .us TLD once seemed appealing to me for practical reasons: It&amp;#39;s short, consistently inexpensive, and hasn&amp;#39;t already sold the vast majority of its useful namespace to squatters. Unfortunately, it forbids WHOIS privacy services, which makes it a privacy and security hazard for personal domains. Pity, that.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124340&quot; title=&quot;I have three locality domains, all with different registrars in Oregon. Two are with unique delegated locality domain registrars (think old school consultancies or ISPs that still exist) and one directly via localitymanagement.us (GoDaddy/USTLD). One of the registrars is from an out of state operator that has been dead for three years. I tracked his widow down and had a number of cordial conversations over about 18 months.  I&amp;#39;ve helped his widow renew some personal domains but she&amp;#39;s recently…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48125989&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;RIP Jon.&amp;#39; In the 90s when learning about the internet I remember reading stuff written by &amp;#39;Jon Postel&amp;#39;, a univeristy employee in California Today, a curious student trying to learn about the internet would probably end up reading stuff written by &amp;#39;Big Tech&amp;#39; and/or academics who have financial relationships with these or other so-called &amp;#39;tech&amp;#39; companies I remember Postel and one other person, perhaps at SRI, I forget her name, had a plan for these sort of hierarchical geographical domainnames. …&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124286&quot; title=&quot;I managed a couple &amp;#39;.k12.oh.us&amp;#39; domains back in the day. The employees hated the domain in their email addresses, but I found it very logical. I saw all kinds screwed-up addresses in bounce messages forwarded to my company address when &amp;#39;can&amp;#39;t email people in the District&amp;#39; tickets got sent my way (a lot of &amp;#39;districtname.oh.k12.us&amp;#39;, etc). I guess it wasn&amp;#39;t so simple for &amp;#39;normies&amp;#39;. One of the schools ended up using a &amp;#39;.com&amp;#39; domain that was one character longer than their &amp;#39;.k12.oh.us&amp;#39; domain but…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Users recall these domains with nostalgia for the era of local ISPs, yet note that &amp;#34;normies&amp;#34; and government employees often found them difficult to use, frequently opting for longer `.com` or `.gov` alternatives instead &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123401&quot; title=&quot;Seeing the *.k12.oh.us in the delegated subdomains brought me back to highschool. When I was little I always wondered why the city name was before k12. Didn&amp;#39;t know it was structured like that everywhere.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124286&quot; title=&quot;I managed a couple &amp;#39;.k12.oh.us&amp;#39; domains back in the day. The employees hated the domain in their email addresses, but I found it very logical. I saw all kinds screwed-up addresses in bounce messages forwarded to my company address when &amp;#39;can&amp;#39;t email people in the District&amp;#39; tickets got sent my way (a lot of &amp;#39;districtname.oh.k12.us&amp;#39;, etc). I guess it wasn&amp;#39;t so simple for &amp;#39;normies&amp;#39;. One of the schools ended up using a &amp;#39;.com&amp;#39; domain that was one character longer than their &amp;#39;.k12.oh.us&amp;#39; domain but…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123583&quot; title=&quot;Seeing the list of contacts for delegated subdomains reminds me of a time when there were a lot more local ISP&amp;#39;s. Inreach.com for Stockton, lodinet (possibly an ISP?) for Lodi.. But the one that really shocked me was https://www.snowcrest.com/mysc/ - which seems to still be up and running?? I wonder if the login page for webmail (ISP-provided email was a thing! And even hosting space!) still works. https://web.archive.org/web/20090909141302/http://neustar.us...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, the infrastructure for these subdomains is aging; many are managed by legacy entities or individuals, leading to concerns that these domains may disappear as their original administrators pass away or stop paying hosting bills &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124340&quot; title=&quot;I have three locality domains, all with different registrars in Oregon. Two are with unique delegated locality domain registrars (think old school consultancies or ISPs that still exist) and one directly via localitymanagement.us (GoDaddy/USTLD). One of the registrars is from an out of state operator that has been dead for three years. I tracked his widow down and had a number of cordial conversations over about 18 months.  I&amp;#39;ve helped his widow renew some personal domains but she&amp;#39;s recently…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jdhodges.com/blog/macbook-neo-benchmarks-analysis/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;MacBook Neo Deep Dive: Benchmarks, Wafer Economics, and the 8GB Gamble&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jdhodges.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48125617&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;336 points · &lt;strong&gt;411 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by tosh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple&amp;#39;s $599 MacBook Neo utilizes the iPhone 16 Pro&amp;#39;s A18 Pro chip to deliver M3-class single-core performance in a fanless chassis, though it faces significant thermal throttling and a non-upgradeable 8GB RAM limit driven by 2026&amp;#39;s global memory shortage. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jdhodges.com/blog/macbook-neo-benchmarks-analysis/&quot; title=&quot;Title: MacBook Neo Processor Benchmarks: A18 Pro CPU vs M1 and M4    URL Source: https://www.jdhodges.com/blog/macbook-neo-benchmarks-analysis/    Published Time: 2026-03-07T20:40:52-06:00    Markdown Content:  **Updated: May 8th, 2026 with pricing and availability update**    Preface: I’m not really a Mac guy. But I have deep respect for what Apple has done with their silicon, and I’ve been following their CPU journey since the Motorola 68k days through PowerPC, the Intel transition, and now their…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The MacBook Neo is praised as a highly portable &amp;#34;vibe coding&amp;#34; device that fills the gap between a smartphone and a full workstation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48126864&quot; title=&quot;for vibe coding stuff, especially when you&amp;#39;re outside touching grass, I believe MacBook Neo is perfect. it fills the gap between the phone remote control (which is too painful for chatting with ai cli) and, well, not having any dev device.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find the 8GB RAM limit concerning, others report that modern macOS memory management handles web development and AI tasks surprisingly well, potentially threatening MacBook Air sales &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48127711&quot; title=&quot;I bought an 8gb M1 Air in 2020 (for what now feels like an absurdly small sum of money) as an experiment in how-cheap-is-too-cheap / chuckable travel laptop. I ended up using it as my main laptop for 2 years without regret, then handed it to my son for school. It remains in perfect condition and as delightful to use as the day I bought it (Apple software snafus notwithstanding). I fully expect to get at least 10 years use out of it. Honestly, I feel like it could probably carry him all the way…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48126859&quot; title=&quot;My wife bought a Neo and has been very happy with it. I was wary of the 8gb memory limit but she is running claude code doing web development with a reasonable number of tabs open and no noticeable lag, so I&amp;#39;d say its definitely getting a lot of mileage out of it. It honestly seems good enough that it might cannibalize Macbook Air sales.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics point to &amp;#34;cursed&amp;#34; keyboard shortcuts and confusing I/O limitations, specifically the inclusion of a functionally slow USB 2.0 port and the lack of Thunderbolt for fast external storage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48127688&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The I/O is also a genuine limitation: one USB 2.0 port is functionally useless for data transfer, no Thunderbolt means no fast external storage, and charging occupies your only USB 3 port. You&amp;#39;re supposed to use the USB-2 port for charging and save the USB-3 port for external accessories, not the other way around It only supports 10Gb/s compared to 40 that USB-4 is theoretically capable of, but that&amp;#39;s more than enough for anyone in the $600 laptop market.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128578&quot; title=&quot;Recently dived into mac world (air) too after decades of win/linux. Pleasant experience and very impressed by hardware and polish except wow the keyboard/shortcut situation is absolutely cursed. Not different...actually cursed. Who decided that sometimes its cmd+Q to close a window while other times its cmd+W and some apps support both but with different behaviours and knowing which of the three it is depends on knowing what&amp;#39;s an OS window (but not all OS windows)? Or why is taking a screenshot…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128171&quot; title=&quot;Do you think those same users know the difference between usb3, usb4, and thunderbolt (or even that all three exist)? More over, do you think they know how to tell cables apart for the three?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these compromises, there is a consensus that the hardware offers exceptional longevity and value for its price point &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48127711&quot; title=&quot;I bought an 8gb M1 Air in 2020 (for what now feels like an absurdly small sum of money) as an experiment in how-cheap-is-too-cheap / chuckable travel laptop. I ended up using it as my main laptop for 2 years without regret, then handed it to my son for school. It remains in perfect condition and as delightful to use as the day I bought it (Apple software snafus notwithstanding). I fully expect to get at least 10 years use out of it. Honestly, I feel like it could probably carry him all the way…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128118&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been on my M1 Air, 16GB, since a few weeks after launch, more than six years now. I still use it daily with lots of Docker containers, VS Code, tons of Electron apps, a small macOS arm VM, and lots of browser tabs simultaneously. Recently, Claude&amp;#39;s VM environment is getting exercised simultaneously. Usually the memory pressure is into yellow, but responsiveness is still far higher than any Mac from the Intel days, and far more usable than any Windows laptop that I have the misfortune to…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48126831&quot; title=&quot;The Neo is pretty great, and the compromises are totally reasonable at the price point. But if they do a second generation with A19 Pro (and thus 12GB RAM) and a slightly better cooling system then it would really be fantastic.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sockpuppet.org/blog/2026/05/12/emacsification/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Emacsification of Software&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sockpuppet.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48118727&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;453 points · 283 comments · by rdslw&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that AI agents are &amp;#34;Emacsifying&amp;#34; software by allowing users to easily generate bespoke, native UI applications to solve personal productivity itches, such as a custom Markdown viewer, shifting the focus from polished commercial products to highly configurable, prompt-driven personal tools. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sockpuppet.org/blog/2026/05/12/emacsification/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Emacsification of Software    URL Source: https://sockpuppet.org/blog/2026/05/12/emacsification/    Published Time: Tue, 12 May 2026 21:59:49 GMT    Markdown Content:  **You want a good Markdown viewer more than you think you do.**    We’re all reading a ton of Markdown. It’s been the lingua franca of software development since long before LLMs. But now agents have led us into a cursed renaissance of TUI tooling, and the reading experience has become intolerable. I’m certain that at least 14%…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of LLMs is enabling a shift toward &amp;#34;personal software,&amp;#34; where users can generate bespoke applications like music players or feed readers tailored to their specific workflows &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128736&quot; title=&quot;Software that today is overwhelmingly prepackaged and usually professional, which I think at this point the nerds should reclaim: * Podcast apps * Music listening apps * Feed readers * Bluesky clients * Note-taking apps * Desktop bookmarking/read-later apps * Chat and instant messaging * Time trackers * Recipe managers These are all things that you can get better-than-replacement-grade results from Claude on --- not necessarily the best, not necessarily the most globally competitive, but…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48125472&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Personal Software&amp;#39; i.e. programs that one writes for oneself, was the original vision of home computing back in the 1960s. The PC wasn&amp;#39;t really anticipated, but the thought was that everyone would have a computer terminal at home, and write programs to do whatever was needed. It was imagined that programming would become easy enough that anyone could learn to do it. We&amp;#39;re not there yet but with LLMs we&amp;#39;re getting closer.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents argue this &amp;#34;Emacsification&amp;#34; allows programmers to automate every minor annoyance and treat their tooling as an evolving &amp;#34;generative&amp;#34; project &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128583&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I want my life to have as little maintenance as possible I honestly can&amp;#39;t even relate to what that even means. I&amp;#39;m a programmer - my everyday job is all about changing the behavior of computer systems - local, remote, cloud, embedded, etc. Requirements change, scope fluctuates, problem space evolves - grows and shrinks, accretion is unavoidable. I need to routinely move between language stacks, different data types, formats, CLI and web tools, protocols, paradigms, OSS and proprietary apps.…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48126840&quot; title=&quot;This is so exactly right and I&amp;#39;ve been saying it to whoever will put up with me...(and now am embarrassed I have no link to show for it. oh well, shame is good for writing. envy too!) Software production is now so easy that everything is a .emacs file (pronounced &amp;#39;dot emacs&amp;#39; btw): meaning, each individual has their own entirely personal, endlessly customizable software cocoon. As tptacek says in the OP, it&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;easier to build your own solution than to install an existing one&amp;#39; - or to learn an…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics warn this can lead to &amp;#34;AI solipsism,&amp;#34; where software becomes a brittle, unmaintainable &amp;#34;cocoon&amp;#34; that is difficult to share or use across different platforms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48125424&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve absolutely engaged in making personal software [0] thanks to the age of LLMs. But to be honest, my time using Emacs didn&amp;#39;t teach me to &amp;#39;build personal software&amp;#39;. My Emacs set up was extremely brittle, and it was a nightmare when I tried to use it across Windows &amp;amp; macOS. My university project was written using an unholy combination of org-mode &amp;amp; some workflow to create a beautiful LaTeX file, and I couldn&amp;#39;t tell you how to recompile it (if I were to try, I&amp;#39;d probably get an LLM to literally…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48126840&quot; title=&quot;This is so exactly right and I&amp;#39;ve been saying it to whoever will put up with me...(and now am embarrassed I have no link to show for it. oh well, shame is good for writing. envy too!) Software production is now so easy that everything is a .emacs file (pronounced &amp;#39;dot emacs&amp;#39; btw): meaning, each individual has their own entirely personal, endlessly customizable software cocoon. As tptacek says in the OP, it&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;easier to build your own solution than to install an existing one&amp;#39; - or to learn an…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128814&quot; title=&quot;To summarize: your claim is that choosing to spend your energy on anything other than your emacs setup is a catastrophic failure in terms of ROI, a delusion, and a sort of dereliction of identity as a programmer. My rebuttal: dude, relax.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some maintain that plaintext and monospaced minimalism remain superior, others highlight that the real power of this era is the ability to instantly &amp;#34;shrink-wrap&amp;#34; software around any idiosyncratic personal preference &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48125554&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; You want a good Markdown viewer more than you think you do. &amp;gt; monospaced and thus fatiguing to read. Monospaced text is fine. I don&amp;#39;t see how people who read code (and code comments) all day care that strongly about this. Plaintext is king&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48125613&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s a reason we&amp;#39;re not reading monospaced here, and a reason we do read monospaced code. But the beauty of this moment is that if you want a really good SwiftUI monospaced Markdown reader, you can have it before dinner. This is exactly what I&amp;#39;m talking about. You have an idiosyncratic personal preference, and it&amp;#39;s now reasonable to expect software to shrink-wrap around that preference.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kotaku.com/kickstarter-is-the-latest-platform-seemingly-forced-to-ban-adult-content-by-payment-processors-2000695648&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Kickstarter is forced to ban adult content by payment processors&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (kotaku.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123198&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;395 points · 284 comments · by stalfosknight&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kickstarter has updated its guidelines to ban various forms of adult and NSFW content, a move reportedly driven by pressure and stricter review policies from its payment processor, Stripe. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kotaku.com/kickstarter-is-the-latest-platform-seemingly-forced-to-ban-adult-content-by-payment-processors-2000695648&quot; title=&quot;Title: Kickstarter Is The Latest Platform Seemingly Forced To Ban Adult Content By Payment Processors    URL Source: https://kotaku.com/kickstarter-is-the-latest-platform-seemingly-forced-to-ban-adult-content-by-payment-processors-2000695648    Published Time: 2026-05-13T14:30:56+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Kickstarter Reportedly Forced To Ban NSFW Content By Stripe    [Skip to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary debate centers on whether payment processors ban adult content due to high chargeback rates and fraud risks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123759&quot; title=&quot;Stripe (their payment process) will handle adult content payments. It puts the account into the high risk category due to the high rate of fraud in those categories. There&amp;#39;s no actual evidence in the article that payment processors made them do it. They actually banned pornography long before this. They just updated the terms to clarify what counted as pornography. &amp;gt; Also this is why we should work to increase circulation of cryptocurrency. Cryptocurrency actually does avoid this problem…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123789&quot; title=&quot;For specifically sexually explicit stuff, it&amp;#39;s because chargebacks are __significantly__ higher for these types of purchases. High enough that it messes with the credit and counterparty risk modeling that processors use. You can use your imagination to come up with many reasons these result in more chargebacks than normal purchases. Theoretically, they could just split out &amp;#39;explicit&amp;#39; vs &amp;#39;normal&amp;#39; risk categories, but there&amp;#39;s two top problems there: 1) it&amp;#39;s just fundamentally a…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123767&quot; title=&quot;The payment processors say the reason is high fraud and charge-back rates in those industries that make it unprofitable to service. I don&amp;#39;t know if this is true or an excuse.  Either way, its an excellent reason why this critical infrastructure shouldn&amp;#39;t be under corporate control.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt; or if they are succumbing to pressure from religious groups and influential activists &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123686&quot; title=&quot;Why payment processors do it? Why people in America do not want to earn more money from commissions? Strong church lobby? Legal risks? I think its mostly religious groups who who are against adult content and sex, or there are other groups? Also this is why we should work to increase circulation of cryptocurrency. No stupid religious restrictions and stupid political sanctions. Also why PornHub and OnlyFans are immune to religious lobby?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124260&quot; title=&quot;Why is this no longer on the front page of HN? This should be the top article. It&amp;#39;s only an hour old and has hundreds up upvotes. The payments industry is strong arming free speech to promote religious fundamentalism. There is no such thing as vice content being higher risk. That&amp;#39;s a diversion topic. Fewer and fewer people are hiding porn payments from their wives. We don&amp;#39;t need the religious oligarchy dictating how you can live. Edit: it&amp;#39;s back. Halfway down the page. A few minutes ago it was…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123554&quot; title=&quot;The actual answer: hedge fund manager Bill Ackman. https://www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/2bswuu1nfc040h... &amp;amp; https://finance.yahoo.com/news/visa-suspends-payments-for-ad... &amp;gt; But he was friendly with Mastercard’s then-CEO Ajay Banga, whom he had met through a mutual friend. Ackman texted Banga, providing a link to Kristof’s story with his tweet: “Amex, VISA and MasterCard should immediately withhold payments or withdraw until this is fixed. PayPal has already done so.” (Ackman was…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that &amp;#34;high risk&amp;#34; labels are a diversion for moral gatekeeping &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124260&quot; title=&quot;Why is this no longer on the front page of HN? This should be the top article. It&amp;#39;s only an hour old and has hundreds up upvotes. The payments industry is strong arming free speech to promote religious fundamentalism. There is no such thing as vice content being higher risk. That&amp;#39;s a diversion topic. Fewer and fewer people are hiding porn payments from their wives. We don&amp;#39;t need the religious oligarchy dictating how you can live. Edit: it&amp;#39;s back. Halfway down the page. A few minutes ago it was…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others point to specific instances where corporate leaders intervened to cut off adult sites following public pressure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123554&quot; title=&quot;The actual answer: hedge fund manager Bill Ackman. https://www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/2bswuu1nfc040h... &amp;amp; https://finance.yahoo.com/news/visa-suspends-payments-for-ad... &amp;gt; But he was friendly with Mastercard’s then-CEO Ajay Banga, whom he had met through a mutual friend. Ackman texted Banga, providing a link to Kristof’s story with his tweet: “Amex, VISA and MasterCard should immediately withhold payments or withdraw until this is fixed. PayPal has already done so.” (Ackman was…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics of the current system suggest that cryptocurrency could bypass these restrictions, though consumers often prefer traditional payments for the very protections that processors find unprofitable in the adult industry &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123759&quot; title=&quot;Stripe (their payment process) will handle adult content payments. It puts the account into the high risk category due to the high rate of fraud in those categories. There&amp;#39;s no actual evidence in the article that payment processors made them do it. They actually banned pornography long before this. They just updated the terms to clarify what counted as pornography. &amp;gt; Also this is why we should work to increase circulation of cryptocurrency. Cryptocurrency actually does avoid this problem…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123789&quot; title=&quot;For specifically sexually explicit stuff, it&amp;#39;s because chargebacks are __significantly__ higher for these types of purchases. High enough that it messes with the credit and counterparty risk modeling that processors use. You can use your imagination to come up with many reasons these result in more chargebacks than normal purchases. Theoretically, they could just split out &amp;#39;explicit&amp;#39; vs &amp;#39;normal&amp;#39; risk categories, but there&amp;#39;s two top problems there: 1) it&amp;#39;s just fundamentally a…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nltimes.nl/2026/05/13/dutch-suicide-prevention-hotline-shares-visitor-data-tech-companies&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Dutch suicide prevention website shares data with tech companies without consent&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nltimes.nl)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48121299&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;253 points · 186 comments · by giuliomagnifico&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Dutch suicide prevention hotline, Stichting 113, has suspended its website&amp;#39;s measurement tools after research revealed it shared sensitive visitor metadata with tech companies like Google and Microsoft without proper consent, potentially violating GDPR regulations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nltimes.nl/2026/05/13/dutch-suicide-prevention-hotline-shares-visitor-data-tech-companies&quot; title=&quot;Title: Dutch suicide prevention hotline shares visitor data with tech companies    URL Source: https://nltimes.nl/2026/05/13/dutch-suicide-prevention-hotline-shares-visitor-data-tech-companies    Published Time: 2026-05-13T08:33:14+0200    Markdown Content:  # Dutch suicide prevention hotline shares visitor data with tech companies | NL Times    Consent to Cookies &amp;amp; Data processing    On this website, we use cookies and similar technologies to process information on your device and personal data (e.g., IP…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discovery that a Dutch suicide prevention website shared data with tech companies—likely via Google Analytics—has sparked debate over whether such breaches are due to malice or technical incompetence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48122593&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Dutch suicide prevention hotline shares visitor data with tech companies&amp;#39; is certainly one way of saying &amp;#39;Dutch suicide prevention hotline website uses Google Analytics&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48121613&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Stichting 113 likely violated the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) by sharing this data. The GDPR states that extra care must be taken regarding the security of medical personal data, which includes contact with an anonymous suicide prevention hotline. This is quite sad to think about in multitude of ways :-( What I am not understanding is the case of why , why would dutch government or website do this, is it out of honest mistake/(incompetence?) or malice. There are so many…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that hotlines are effective tools that have significantly reduced suicide rates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48122550&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Young adult suicide rates dropped after U.S. launched 988 hotline&amp;#39;: * https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/988-crisis-hotlin... &amp;#39;Suicide deaths dropped 11% from projected rate in the first two years of the revamped lifeline&amp;#39; * https://www.statnews.com/2026/04/22/988-hotline-linked-11-pe...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others view them as &amp;#34;peak alienation,&amp;#34; characterizing them as corporate-style solutions that prioritize liability management over genuine human connection &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48122123&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s telling, IMO, that Western cultures deals with suicidality with hotlines you can call. It&amp;#39;s like some joke from gonzo journalism come to fruition. I don&amp;#39;t know what the answer is, but as a person who&amp;#39;s been suicidal, for me it wasn&amp;#39;t a hotline. It&amp;#39;s even more fitting, if not kind of perfect, that said hotlines farm your data and sell it. :chef&amp;#39;s kiss: what else is there to say. Like just about everything else, callous people make money while vulnerable, sensitive people pay up. Beautiful…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123053&quot; title=&quot;Sure, concretely, my point was that hotlines are a very capitalist feeling thing for me. Probably because of trying to deal with corporiations, from monopolies/utilities to things like airlines. My experience in this realm has been one of alienation. So, taking the hotline and applying it to people in suicidal crisis is like peak alienation in my mind. Personally, I&amp;#39;m not anti-capitalist, but capitalism to me is tied up conceptually with money and expedience. Feelings, in my opinion, are sort…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Concerns also persist regarding the risks of seeking help, including the potential for data exploitation and the 1% chance of involuntary police intervention or hospitalization &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48122422&quot; title=&quot;https://www.cbsnews.com/news/will-988-call-the-police-data-s... &amp;gt; Many people in mental health crisis fear that if they dial 988, law enforcement might show up or they might be forced to go to the hospital. &amp;gt; But getting sent that kind of &amp;#39;involuntary emergency rescue&amp;#39; happens to around 1% of callers, suggests new data from Vibrant Emotional Health, the administrator of the 988 Lifeline for suicide and mental health crises.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123053&quot; title=&quot;Sure, concretely, my point was that hotlines are a very capitalist feeling thing for me. Probably because of trying to deal with corporiations, from monopolies/utilities to things like airlines. My experience in this realm has been one of alienation. So, taking the hotline and applying it to people in suicidal crisis is like peak alienation in my mind. Personally, I&amp;#39;m not anti-capitalist, but capitalism to me is tied up conceptually with money and expedience. Feelings, in my opinion, are sort…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48122566&quot; title=&quot;If anything I did had a 1% chance of involuntary committal I would stop doing that thing immediately.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.propublica.org/article/evicore-health-insurance-denials-cigna-unitedhealthcare-aetna-prior-authorizations&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;quot;Not Medically Necessary&amp;quot;: Helping America&amp;#39;s Health Insurers Deny Coverage&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (propublica.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48126000&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;216 points · 209 comments · by ceejayoz&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A ProPublica investigation reveals that major health insurers outsource medical reviews to EviCore, a company that uses algorithms and profit-driven contracts to increase treatment denials. Critics allege the firm’s &amp;#34;denials for dollars&amp;#34; business model prioritizes cost-cutting over patient care, leading to dangerous delays and inappropriate rejections. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.propublica.org/article/evicore-health-insurance-denials-cigna-unitedhealthcare-aetna-prior-authorizations&quot; title=&quot;Inside the Company Helping America’s Biggest Health Insurers Deny Coverage for Treatments    When companies like Aetna or UnitedHealthcare want to rein in costs, they turn to EviCore, whose business model depends on turning down payments for care recommended by doctors for their patients.    Arrow Right    Caret    Close    [ProPublica](https://www.propublica.org/)    Menu    [Donate](https://give.propublica.org/campaign/748664/donate?c_src=UpRed)    [ProPublica](https://www.propublica.org/)    Investigative…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Physicians report that insurers use &amp;#34;peer-to-peer&amp;#34; reviews as a hurdle to weed out providers, often employing non-specialists or non-physicians to deny claims under the guise of medical necessity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48126617&quot; title=&quot;“The algorithm cannot say no, however. If it finds problems, it sends the request for review to a team of in-house nurses and doctors who consult company medical guidelines. Only doctors can issue a final denial.” As a physician, I’ve had to speak to these so called “peers” in a peer to peer denials with both my clinic and hospital setting. They are usually people who aren’t physicians as a first line of their defense, ie therapist, nurses, etc. This weeds out the providers who either don’t…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48126971&quot; title=&quot;I feel like this should really be something people should lose their license over. By deeming something not medically necessary they are (in my opinion) effectively practicing medicine. If they aren&amp;#39;t qualified to practice that specialty, or aren&amp;#39;t acting in the patients interest we should really be getting malpractice suits on them and stripping medical licenses.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the high cost of US healthcare is driven by payments to practitioners &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128444&quot; title=&quot;In fact it&amp;#39;s overwhelmingly going to the providers. https://nationalhealthspending.org/&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128745&quot; title=&quot;This isn&amp;#39;t a response to anything I just said. I really don&amp;#39;t understand why people collapse into all this handwaving when people point out the obvious: the money in our system is going to providers, and, in particular, it&amp;#39;s going to practitioners .&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that insurers are increasingly acquiring medical practices to capture profits from both sides of the system &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128740&quot; title=&quot;https://sph.brown.edu/news/2025-11-10/unitedhealthcare-optum... &amp;gt; Today, many of those practices have been bought up by large corporations, including hospitals, private-equity firms and even health-insurance companies. It’s a shift that not only has changed how money moves through the health care system, but may also be helping some insurers boost their profits, according to new research published in Health Affairs. &amp;gt; A study from researchers at Brown University’s Center for Advancing Health…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128763&quot; title=&quot;The insurers are buying the practices so they can eat at both sides of the trough. (And the independent practicioners are having to use a significant portion of the money they take in to… fight the insurers!)&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. This dynamic creates a &amp;#34;soul-crushing&amp;#34; environment where the US spends more per capita than any other nation while patients and doctors must constantly fight for basic coverage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48127312&quot; title=&quot;The worst part, simultaneously soul crushing and apocalyptic rage inducing is that we get these outcomes after spending more per capita on healthcare than pretty much any country on the planet.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128763&quot; title=&quot;The insurers are buying the practices so they can eat at both sides of the trough. (And the independent practicioners are having to use a significant portion of the money they take in to… fight the insurers!)&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128003&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tell HN: Dont use Claude Design, lost access to my projects after unsubscribing&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128003&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;297 points · 85 comments · by pycassa&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A user warns that unsubscribing from Claude&amp;#39;s paid plan can result in the loss of access to existing projects and unused credits, highlighting potential billing and access bugs within the platform. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128003&quot; title=&quot;I wanted to try codex after 5 months of claude code max subscription. And then I went back to my previous projects on claude design only to realize I don&amp;amp;#x27;t have access to them anymore.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;This is a first. I never lost access to any of my past sessions because I unsubscribed in any of the LLM apps.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;I actually wanted to try out codex previously, but had similar experience with my credits. They gave extra credits equivalent to my montly subscription price, with some time limit because claude…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users report that unsubscribing from Claude Pro results in immediate loss of access to Claude Design projects, sparking debate over whether this is standard SaaS compliance or an unusual &amp;#34;nuking&amp;#34; of data compared to competitors like Google or Microsoft &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128461&quot; title=&quot;So.. you unsubscribed from a SaaS and expected them not to purge your data? Why would that make sense? Anthropic may be a bunch of skids but it sounds like they did the right thing here. Pretty much all SaaS applications, especially in B2B, are required by compliance to remove customer data within X amount of time at the end of the contractual relationship.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128715&quot; title=&quot;You get two years of &amp;#39;free&amp;#39; (readonly) storage if you unsubscribe from google, it&amp;#39;s very unusual to just nuke all access immediately. &amp;gt; are required by compliance to remove customer data within X amount of time at the end of the contractual relationship. that&amp;#39;s a very bullshit justification, we&amp;#39;re not talking about the &amp;#39;delete account&amp;#39; button - especially since claude has a free tier.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128906&quot; title=&quot;I guess it&amp;#39;s not a termination, but a downgrade to the &amp;#39;free&amp;#39; tier. But that still makes sense, given Claude Design is limited &amp;#39;to Pro, Max, Team, and Enterprise plans&amp;#39;. He&amp;#39;s not on that plan anymore so.. what commercial reason could they possibly have to keep his data? Google Workspace seems to halt access immediately[1] and purge data within 60d[2]. For comparison, Atlassian leaves you access for 15d, and purges data at 60d[3]. 365 gives you 90d[4] before purging. This is a pretty regular…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest the data remains accessible via manual JSON exports &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128998&quot; title=&quot;It is still there and you may get it easily. If you export your data [0] all your Claude Design chats are in a design_chats directory along with the code, even if your account currently has no access to Claude Design. It is .json, but converting that into usable code is easily done, either manually or by asking any fairly modern LLM via OpenCode. Just did it myself, it works. I will say that I&amp;#39;d still prefer if they allowed API use of Claude Design, it does have some niceties regarding the way…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue the tool&amp;#39;s output is &amp;#34;disposable code&amp;#34; that is difficult for humans to maintain or secure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128644&quot; title=&quot;Aside from OP&amp;#39;s post there&amp;#39;s another issue with claude design worth mentioning. Yes, it makes absolutely beautiful designs, stunningly so, but the actual code is not something a human could ever maintain. So its like ending up with an opaque blob. Write-once, read-never, or almost disposal code. This is kind of bad because code people aren&amp;#39;t going to bother to read might contain vulnerabilities. It&amp;#39;s an extreme example of slop code since while normally LLMs can produce code that ranges from…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical critiques also highlight that LLMs struggle with spatial relativity and visual hierarchy, leading some to recommend diffusion-based models for more effective UI exploration &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128564&quot; title=&quot;A lot of these things are made fast and loose, and unfortunately this is the reality of using the bleeding edge. Even Figma went through this kind of thing very early on. To add something else to the discussion however, I&amp;#39;d encourage people to skip out on Claude Design for other reasons, and that is the inherent restrictions of LLMs for visual design. LLMs are blind, and spatial relativity is tremendously hard across layers of nested html / css. If you&amp;#39;re early on, I&amp;#39;d recommend starting with…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48129279&quot; title=&quot;I guess they do &amp;#39;see&amp;#39; but more like &amp;#39;see an explanation of the image&amp;#39;, not &amp;#39;see&amp;#39; as in experience visually. They&amp;#39;re really bad at details and perfection when it comes to images, and doesn&amp;#39;t understand things like visual hierarchy, affordances and other fundamental design concepts. Most of them are able to describe those things with letters, but doesn&amp;#39;t seem to actually fundamentally grasp it when asking it to do UIs even when mentioning these things. Try doing 100% vibe-coding with an agent and…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08419&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Deterministic Fully-Static Whole-Binary Translation Without Heuristics&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (arxiv.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48117810&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;298 points · 65 comments · by matt_d&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Researchers have introduced Elevator, a binary translator that statically converts x86-64 executables to AArch64 by exhaustively translating all possible byte interpretations. This deterministic approach eliminates the need for runtime components or heuristics, enabling pre-deployment certification while matching the performance of existing JIT emulation methods. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08419&quot; title=&quot;Title: Deterministic Fully-Static Whole-Binary Translation without Heuristics    URL Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08419    Published Time: Tue, 12 May 2026 00:10:43 GMT    Markdown Content:  # [2605.08419] Deterministic Fully-Static Whole-Binary Translation without Heuristics    [Skip to main content](https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08419#content)    [![Image 1: Cornell University…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary value of deterministic static translation lies in regulated industries like aviation and medicine, where safety-critical certification requires that the executed code remains identical to the certified binary &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48118644&quot; title=&quot;The certification angle is the most interesting part to me. Regulated industries (aviation, medical devices) often can&amp;#39;t use JIT for exactly this reason, the code that runs has to be the code that was certified. Static translation that produces a signable binary is a real unlock there, code bloat notwithstanding.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48118850&quot; title=&quot;It is completely relevant, if you want reliable software that you use daily to continue running without a massive rewrite. Before suggesting to use LLMs to completely rewrite this sort of software, there is a reason why compilers need to be certified to operate in safety critical environments. Not everything needs to use LLMs as the solution to a problem. I would go as far to say that using an LLM in this context is the wrong solution and is irrelevant to critical systems. Maybe some here see…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While critics argue that performance is hindered by significant code bloat and that Rice&amp;#39;s theorem makes translating adversarial or hand-rolled assembly provably unsolvable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48118235&quot; title=&quot;Cute, but Rice&amp;#39;s theorem remains, and while they translated every byte as code, still no handling is possible for char buf[] = {0xB8, 0x2A, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0xC3};     return ((int (*)(void))buf)(); static translation is only possible when you assume no adversarial code AND mostly assume compiler-produced binaries. hand-rolled asm gets hard, and adversarial code is provably unsolvable in all cases. still, pretty cool for cooperative binaries&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48119173&quot; title=&quot;50x isn&amp;#39;t reasonable, it&amp;#39;s a cache disaster. Any perf win from avoiding JIT gets eaten alive.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others note that modern OS security policies already restrict the execution of arbitrary data as code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48118263&quot; title=&quot;But in fact no modern processor/OS executes this either. Pages are marked as executable or not, and static data is loaded as non-executable pages.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights a divide regarding AI: some view LLMs as irrelevant to safety-critical systems due to reliability requirements, while others suggest they could assist if humans remain legally responsible for the output &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48118680&quot; title=&quot;I wonder: how relevant is this portion of the software industry? Because I’m guessing there is also no way they can apply LLms at scale, which is never discussed in the larger AI at work narrative&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48118850&quot; title=&quot;It is completely relevant, if you want reliable software that you use daily to continue running without a massive rewrite. Before suggesting to use LLMs to completely rewrite this sort of software, there is a reason why compilers need to be certified to operate in safety critical environments. Not everything needs to use LLMs as the solution to a problem. I would go as far to say that using an LLM in this context is the wrong solution and is irrelevant to critical systems. Maybe some here see…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48119250&quot; title=&quot;Safety critical software is mostly a compliance dance that incidentally produces artifacts with lower defect rates than usual. LLMs can help with safety critical code as long as a human signs their name that they are responsible for its behavior.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ossresistance.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Open Source Resistance: keep OSS alive on company time&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ossresistance.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123015&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;275 points · 84 comments · by mikemcquaid&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Open Source Resistance manifesto encourages software maintainers to sustain critical open-source projects during paid work hours, arguing that such maintenance is essential infrastructure work rather than a hobby to be performed on personal time. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ossresistance.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Open Source Resistance    URL Source: https://ossresistance.com/    Published Time: Wed, 13 May 2026 14:54:09 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Open Source Resistance  # Open Source Resistance | A direct-action manifesto for maintainers keeping open source alive on company time.  [Skip to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While many developers support contributing to open source on company time, they face significant legal hurdles because employers typically own the intellectual property of work created during job duties &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123797&quot; title=&quot;While I wholeheartedly agree this as a general concept, I find it tricky to accomplish in practice. Ianal, but afaik in general your employer owns the ip, and as such publishing it as oss requires explicit permission. And getting that permission often is difficult, needs to go through endless red tape and legal departments etc. &amp;gt; In the United States, United Kingdom, and several other jurisdictions, if a work is created by an employee as part of their job duties, the employer is considered the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124293&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; &amp;#39;and make sure you own the open source IP you ship. &amp;#39; In all the juridictions I have worked in, the code I ship during my work hours is owned by my employer, not me. I simply just can&amp;#39;t decide on my own to contribute during my work hours. I need a formal agreement to work on open source code, and every single time I asked for it it took so much time (months) to run through legal department that I simply gave up or another contributor had shipped a PR in the meantime so I just gave up asking.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124564&quot; title=&quot;I have never investigated, but I was under the impression that in Germany the employer owns all source code created during working hours by default. Most employers that are not IT focused wont even understand what open source is or how it works. So I guess it&amp;#39;s hopeless for many to get permission. The linked site should probably focus on explaining benefits of open source and advocate legal guidelines for _employers_ primarily.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Some argue that these legal concerns are largely theoretical and that developers should simply &amp;#34;just do stuff&amp;#34; since IP challenges are rare in practice &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124221&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; While I wholeheartedly agree this as a general concept, I find it tricky to accomplish in practice. The problems you are describing are not actually &amp;#39;problems in practice&amp;#39;, as you say. They are theoretical problems. In practice: You can just do stuff. There is no subroutine on your computer stopping the git push. In practice: Employers just write stuff in their employement contracts. They&amp;#39;ll write everything they possibly can, to cover asses in every possible direction. If they&amp;#39;re allowed to…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, while others suggest framing contributions as a way to reduce future maintenance costs and receive expert peer review &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124068&quot; title=&quot;My employers have generally been fine giving me blanket permission to contribute to specific open source projects. The framing matters: don&amp;#39;t say &amp;#39;can I please do some charity work because it makes me feel good&amp;#39;. Say, &amp;#39;can I have your permission to get free rigorous review from experts in my field, and zero out all future maintenance costs for your company by contributing my fixes to the upstream open source project?&amp;#39; Because that&amp;#39;s really how it is. No employer of mine has ever said no to…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the benefits, bureaucratic red tape often causes projects to languish in proprietary limbo, especially during layoffs when internal champions are lost &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48125293&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m a little sad that I got laid off from a previous job for a variety of reasons, but one big one was that there were discussions of letting me open source some very big changes I had made to the Kafka Streams library. I rewrote a lot of stuff while keeping the API mostly compatible, focusing on emphasizing non-blocking IO with backpressure semantics available if necessary.  It was really cool and enabled a lot of interesting stuff involving the state store and mixing+matching blocking and…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://internetcleanup.foundation/2026/05/european-governments-3000-tracking-sites-1000-phpmyadmins-and-99pct-poorly-encrypted-email-introducing-securitybaseline-eu/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SecurityBaseline.eu&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (internetcleanup.foundation)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48118763&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;228 points · 106 comments · by aequitas&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The launch of SecurityBaseline.eu reveals significant cybersecurity failures across European governments, including 3,081 sites using illegal tracking cookies, over 1,000 exposed database management interfaces, and 99% of email systems failing to meet modern encryption standards. &lt;a href=&quot;https://internetcleanup.foundation/2026/05/european-governments-3000-tracking-sites-1000-phpmyadmins-and-99pct-poorly-encrypted-email-introducing-securitybaseline-eu/&quot; title=&quot;Title: European governments: 3.000 tracking sites, 1.000 phpMyAdmins, and 99% poorly encrypted email. Introducing SecurityBaseline.eu    URL Source: https://internetcleanup.foundation/2026/05/european-governments-3000-tracking-sites-1000-phpmyadmins-and-99pct-poorly-encrypted-email-introducing-securitybaseline-eu/    Published Time: 2026-05-13T06:54:01+00:00    Markdown Content:  # European governments: 3.000 tracking sites, 1.000 phpMyAdmins, and 99% poorly encrypted email. Introducing…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SecurityBaseline.eu reveals significant vulnerabilities across 67,000 government entities, including publicly reachable database interfaces and poor email encryption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48118764&quot; title=&quot;Today we launch SecurityBaseline: monitoring 67.000 governments and 200.000 sites. Headlines: 3.000 governmental sites use tracking cookies illegally, over 1.000 database management interfaces are publicly reachable, 99% of governmental email is poorly encrypted.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters attribute Germany’s poor performance to a culture of blame-avoidance and restrictive &amp;#34;hacking laws&amp;#34; that criminalize independent security research &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48119237&quot; title=&quot;Might this be because any kind of genuine pentesting, unless it&amp;#39;s explicitly been paid for, is highly illegal in countries like Germany (§ 202c StGB, § 202a StGB, etc.)? For example, I&amp;#39;d be more than happy to pentest some govt websites here in Germany, if the very act of visiting them with a non-standard browser couldn&amp;#39;t somehow already be misconstrued as breaking various hacking laws. No thanks! Keep your security vulnerabilities.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48119297&quot; title=&quot;In Germany we have the completely wrong mindset for such things. Instead of being grateful, all we care about is &amp;#39;whose fault is it&amp;#39; and CYA tactics. And no one wants to be &amp;#39;guilty&amp;#39; or have their incompetence revealed, so suits will do anything they can to avoid that. Somethings serious needs to go wrong first, so that loss of face already happens, before anyone will move. Maybe we need to get hacked by Russia a few more times.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48119321&quot; title=&quot;How is the home of chaos computer club so bad at this....&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate whether missing DNSSEC justifies a &amp;#34;red&amp;#34; warning, others argue that hosting government email on external services like Outlook poses a far greater security risk &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48119529&quot; title=&quot;Colouring an area red because they don&amp;#39;t have DNSSEC enabled on a domain seems excessive. A nice addition would be to add who is hosting their email. First handful I&amp;#39;ve looked at are all outlook.com, which seems a much bigger privacy &amp;amp; security risk than not using DNSSEC.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48119787&quot; title=&quot;Not making it red would downplay the &amp;#39;SEC&amp;#39; part in DNSSEC. We already have some privacy metrics in addition to tracking cookies, and there will be more. All are important at the same time.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ericswpark.com/blog/2026/2026-05-12-my-graduation-cap-runs-rust/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;My graduation cap runs Rust&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ericswpark.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48116207&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;214 points · 93 comments · by ericswpark&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Eric Park developed a custom graduation cap featuring 48 LEDs controlled by an ATtiny85 microcontroller running Rust code, using a reed switch and magnet to trigger light patterns when the tassel is moved. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ericswpark.com/blog/2026/2026-05-12-my-graduation-cap-runs-rust/&quot; title=&quot;Title: My graduation cap runs Rust    URL Source: https://ericswpark.com/blog/2026/2026-05-12-my-graduation-cap-runs-rust/    Published Time: Wed, 13 May 2026 02:29:50 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Eric Park  # Eric Park    [](https://ericswpark.com/blog/2026/2026-05-12-my-graduation-cap-runs-rust/#top)    [Eric Park](https://ericswpark.com/)    *   [Blog](https://ericswpark.com/blog/)  *   [Pages](https://ericswpark.com/pages/)  *   [About](https://ericswpark.com/about/)    Enable light mode Enable dark…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the high cost and perceived inefficiency of renting graduation regalia in the US, with users debating whether the ~$100 price tag reflects labor costs or predatory pricing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48118455&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Fun fact #1: you rent your cap and gown in the US. You have to return them. And they’re expensive, too! I paid $94 just for the privilege of renting mine, which is insane because they probably cost way less than that to manufacture. Ah, yes, of course this is how it works in the US.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48118723&quot; title=&quot;Yes, you have to pay a decent wage to the people helping you fit, cleaning, and storing the goods. Manufacture is done in a low cost country with cheap labour, so buying clothing seems cheap.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48119184&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a $10 gown, renting it for $100 is madness&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48119003&quot; title=&quot;Do you truly believe most of that goes towards wages?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest cost-saving measures like sharing rentals or skipping ceremonies entirely, others note that smaller or more expensive schools sometimes include the regalia in tuition &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48116457&quot; title=&quot;If you go to a bigger school, they have multiple graduation ceremonies. Split the rental amongst anyone who does not share a time slot with you. That’s what I did and people acted like this was a genius move. No, I am just broke.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48116915&quot; title=&quot;I am pretty sure I purchased my cap and gown instead of renting. But my college was a bit smaller.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48116885&quot; title=&quot;I skipped the graduation ceremonies for my BA and my first master’s degree. For my second, apparently the cost of a cap, gown and hood was included in the tuition so I have academic regalia sitting in a box somewhere should I ever find myself in need of such, a scenario I cannot imagine ever coming to pass.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, some commenters expressed &amp;#34;Rust fatigue,&amp;#34; arguing that the programming language was inconsequential to the project and that its mention in the title was unnecessary &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48116925&quot; title=&quot;1. No it doesn&amp;#39;t, it runs machine code. 2. Yet again we have the need to announce Rust to the world, when the usage of it is inconsequential in this context&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48117341&quot; title=&quot;If there’s anything I really want written in Rust, it’s a Chrome extension to filter out all the HN posts about Rust.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fortune.com/2026/05/12/lake-tahoe-data-center-49000-residents-power-source/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;50K Tahoe residents need power as utility eyes redirecting lines to data centers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (fortune.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123090&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;153 points · 150 comments · by cdrnsf&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nearly 50,000 Lake Tahoe residents must find a new electricity provider by May 2027 after NV Energy announced it will stop supplying power to the region to prioritize energy capacity for neighboring data centers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fortune.com/2026/05/12/lake-tahoe-data-center-49000-residents-power-source/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;It&amp;#39;s like we don&amp;#39;t exist&amp;#39;: Nearly 50,000 Lake Tahoe residents face power loss as utility redirects lines to data centers | Fortune    Roughly 49,000 Lake Tahoe residents could lose 75% of their power after their energy provider said it&amp;#39;s directing energy to neighboring data centers.    Search    Subscribe    * [Home](/)  * [Latest](/section/latest/)  * [Fortune 500](/section/fortune-500/)  * [Finance](/section/finance/)  * [Tech](/section/tech/)  * [Leadership](/section/leadership/)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a growing conflict where residential power needs are pitted against industrial data center expansion, with many arguing that the public is unfairly forced to subsidize infrastructure costs and scale back usage for corporate benefit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48125284&quot; title=&quot;There are two simultaneous problems that I&amp;#39;ve come to understand with datacenters and the people that live in their proximity: 1. Somehow the public is always left holding the bag for increased transmission costs despite the cause of the increase being a single (or short list) of outliers. 2. The residential public, as is tradition, is always asked to scale down for industrial demand. How can we imagine expanding a system that results in both of these outcomes? That, to me, seems to be the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48125363&quot; title=&quot;The idea that capitalism off loads the cost of externalities onto the unwitting public is nothing new. This is just the most recent and obvious version. Air anbd water pollution are the old ones. They make the pollution and the public pays for it with superfund sites or increased health care costs. The solution is having the consumer pay for the externalities when they use the product. But this would make AI so much more expensive. When you use AI you are exploiting other people. Just keep that…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48125881&quot; title=&quot;Transferring wealth from the young and poor to the old and wealthy is the entire purpose of our government. This is now the endpoint we are bouldering towards: the bottom 90% increasingly have nothing left to steal or exploit. And just like an algal bloom that eventually runs out of oxygen and dies, this is where this system and our society unravels.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view this as a systemic failure of capitalism to account for externalities, others contend that the crisis merely exposes long-standing negligence in municipal utility planning and resource management &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123943&quot; title=&quot;This is like the movie Chinatown, where people were fighting over water, but now it&amp;#39;s all about electricity. It sounds like Lake Tahoe residents kicked the can down the road and didn&amp;#39;t care about electricity for so long that now they have to pay the piper. I think it&amp;#39;s entire just that they have to bear the costs of their own electricity.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48125363&quot; title=&quot;The idea that capitalism off loads the cost of externalities onto the unwitting public is nothing new. This is just the most recent and obvious version. Air anbd water pollution are the old ones. They make the pollution and the public pays for it with superfund sites or increased health care costs. The solution is having the consumer pay for the externalities when they use the product. But this would make AI so much more expensive. When you use AI you are exploiting other people. Just keep that…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124740&quot; title=&quot;A lot of these types of AI complaints feel like blaming a pothole for cracking your windshield in half even though you&amp;#39;ve been driving around with it full of chips and micro cracks for years. It&amp;#39;s certainly exacerbated the issue to a point where it&amp;#39;s impossible to ignore now but the warning signs have been there for years- utilities and municipalities failing to secure power and water resources for future residents, companies engaging in mass layoffs only for the stock prices to climb. AI…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Proposed solutions range from reclassifying power as a strictly public utility to requiring consumers to pay the true cost of the energy &amp;#34;exploited&amp;#34; by AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123570&quot; title=&quot;Power should be a public utility, just like water and sewage.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48125363&quot; title=&quot;The idea that capitalism off loads the cost of externalities onto the unwitting public is nothing new. This is just the most recent and obvious version. Air anbd water pollution are the old ones. They make the pollution and the public pays for it with superfund sites or increased health care costs. The solution is having the consumer pay for the externalities when they use the product. But this would make AI so much more expensive. When you use AI you are exploiting other people. Just keep that…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124039&quot; title=&quot;just as a thought experiment, say you&amp;#39;re an entrepreneur, how would you solve this problem? whether it AI, Data Centers, EVs...I&amp;#39;m seeing this problem more and more, we need more energy/power. I&amp;#39;m curious to see what others think are possible viable solutions.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theverge.com/tech/929091/meta-ai-threads-account-block&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Meta won&amp;#39;t let you block its AI account on Threads&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theverge.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48126981&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;194 points · 83 comments · by logickkk1&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Threads users are expressing frustration after discovering they cannot block Meta’s new AI chatbot account, which was recently introduced to provide conversational context and answers within the platform. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theverge.com/tech/929091/meta-ai-threads-account-block&quot; title=&quot;Meta won’t let you block its AI account on Threads    Hey Meta, why are Threads users angry?    ![](https://www.google-analytics.com/g/collect?v=2&amp;amp;tid=G-C3QZPB4GVE&amp;amp;cid=555&amp;amp;en=noscript_page_view)    [Skip to main content](#content)    [The homepageThe VergeThe Verge logo.](/)    [The VergeThe Verge logo.](/)    * [Tech](https://www.theverge.com/tech)  * [Reviews](https://www.theverge.com/reviews)  * [Science](https://www.theverge.com/science)  * [Entertainment](https://www.theverge.com/entertainment)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the trade-off between avoiding Meta’s intrusive features and maintaining a social life, with some users arguing that deleting accounts is the only way to truly block unwanted content &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48127186&quot; title=&quot;You can block all their content, just delete your account.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128486&quot; title=&quot;I deleted all my meta accounts a couple years ago (Facebook, Instagram). When I did it I was afraid I would miss out. Nope: 5 years after I feel good about not being a dopamine-addicted sheep (At least to Meta). It makes me sick to my stomach whenever I go to a public place and see so many people mindlessly losing their life watching reels and stories full of ads. I Used to take the Caltrain and I estimate &amp;gt;50% of the people were mindlessly scrolling instagram during the 1 hour train ride. The…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some participants claim that alternative platforms like RA or Dice are replacing &amp;#34;walled gardens,&amp;#34; others contend that Meta remains essential for discovering local events and maintaining friendships with non-technical people &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128673&quot; title=&quot;What does your social life look like?  Because the reality for me is that in any major city, a significant number of places - even if they technically have websites - post all of their events and happenings on Instagram/FB. Sure, I can talk to my close friends on any number of IM platforms, but if I want to get out and have new experiences, join club meetups, be notified of events at venues I care about, etc. - it&amp;#39;s Meta or miss out.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128712&quot; title=&quot;Go to clubs and check the events from ra.co. Go to concerts and art galleries they all have web pages. Berlin, Germany&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48129796&quot; title=&quot;I feel like the suggestion to just delete your Meta account is unhelpful and even harmful in some situations. I know a lot of us in this field don&amp;#39;t mind having a small social circle, but for us that struggle to even have that, or that the process of doing that, requires you to be as open and reachable as possible to make it easier to create or maintain friendships, this often requires having an account to use Messenger (I know regionally this may differ). Being difficult in this way, when most…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48129143&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Most venues and places are slowly going away from closed gardens. They are? Honestly, first time hearing about this. I&amp;#39;ve noticed only big events get posted outside of the IG/etc. Even in Tokyo, a simple thing like checking if a place is open on a public holiday is to check their Instagram.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable anecdotes include users successfully using &amp;#34;bogus&amp;#34; accounts for Marketplace or event info to minimize exposure, while one user reported receiving a multi-week ban for verbally abusing the Meta AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128486&quot; title=&quot;I deleted all my meta accounts a couple years ago (Facebook, Instagram). When I did it I was afraid I would miss out. Nope: 5 years after I feel good about not being a dopamine-addicted sheep (At least to Meta). It makes me sick to my stomach whenever I go to a public place and see so many people mindlessly losing their life watching reels and stories full of ads. I Used to take the Caltrain and I estimate &amp;gt;50% of the people were mindlessly scrolling instagram during the 1 hour train ride. The…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128919&quot; title=&quot;Yeah the instagram posting is such a complete BS. I have a bogus instagram account where I don&amp;#39;t follow anyone for the couple times a year I need to find set times for an artist or that kind of stuff. We need to shame artists/events/clubs that only post on Instagram&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128589&quot; title=&quot;I got a multi week ban for breaking metas rules when I told its AI to uh fornicate with itself, go somewhere else and then cease living.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.haiku-os.org&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Haiku&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (haiku-os.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124002&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;174 points · 87 comments · by tosh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Haiku is an open-source operating system inspired by BeOS that focuses on fast, simple personal computing, recently announcing its participation in Google Summer of Code 2026 with three selected students working on projects like Bluetooth modernization and hardware management. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.haiku-os.org&quot; title=&quot;Title: Haiku Project    URL Source: https://www.haiku-os.org/    Markdown Content:  # Home | Haiku Project    [![Image 1: Home](https://www.haiku-os.org/images/haiku_logo_white.svg)](https://www.haiku-os.org/)    [![Image 2: Download](https://www.haiku-os.org/images/download_32.png)](https://www.haiku-os.org/get-haiku &amp;#39;Get Haiku!&amp;#39;)[![Image 3: Contact](https://www.haiku-os.org/images/App_Mail_32.png)](https://www.haiku-os.org/contact &amp;#39;Contact the Haiku Project&amp;#39;)[![Image 4:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While commenters admire the project&amp;#39;s longevity and the technical elegance of the original BeOS &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124572&quot; title=&quot;BeOS was my dream from childhood. Haiku is amazing, especially because the original BeOS only existed for five years, while Haiku has been going for 24 already. What stamina!&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124632&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a shame that Be failed. I think they were a victim of Microsoft&amp;#39;s aggressive anti-competitive activities in the late-1990s, combined with Apple deciding to bring back Steve Jobs via the acquisition of NeXT (making Apple a serious competitor in the same segment that Be was targeting -- multimedia and realtime applications). Ultimately, they prevailed in winning about $24M from Microsoft, but that was after the company had shut down. I presume the winnings went to Palm. Super cool to see…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, there is significant debate regarding Haiku&amp;#39;s modern utility. Critics argue that the OS suffers from a lack of native software and remains in a &amp;#34;perpetual beta&amp;#34; state that cannot compete with the programming ecosystems of Linux or Windows &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48125668&quot; title=&quot;I tried for years to get this operating system to run on my hardware.  Last year I succeeded. Only...there was no software.  The system ran beautifully.  But I had no web browser that was supported.  All the software seemed to be ports from Linux and didn&amp;#39;t seem to take advantage of Haiku&amp;#39;s advantages. I had a good speedy operating system that booted almost immediately to the desktop.  But nothing to do when I got there. BeOS back when I tried it in the V5.0 days had software written for it. …&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124763&quot; title=&quot;The problem with Haiku is that it is unable to leave the perpetual beta situation. On Linux I can use perl, ruby, python, php, julia - you name it. Good luck thinking you can do this on Haiku, as-is. Edit: I should say that I like Haiku, but I used it many years ago, and the situation with regards to programming still has barely improved here for the most part. They are building literally a dream OS nobody will seriously use.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, others remain fascinated by the &amp;#34;what-if&amp;#34; history of BeOS, noting it nearly became the foundation for macOS before Apple chose NeXT &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124632&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a shame that Be failed. I think they were a victim of Microsoft&amp;#39;s aggressive anti-competitive activities in the late-1990s, combined with Apple deciding to bring back Steve Jobs via the acquisition of NeXT (making Apple a serious competitor in the same segment that Be was targeting -- multimedia and realtime applications). Ultimately, they prevailed in winning about $24M from Microsoft, but that was after the company had shut down. I presume the winnings went to Palm. Super cool to see…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48125226&quot; title=&quot;They were never going to compete with Microsoft even if MS hadn’t screwed them (which MS definitely did). At the time, MS was invincible in the enterprise market. Be’s only path to success was with Apple. Jean-Louis Gassée was negotiating the buy-out with Apple but he wanted more than Apple was willing to pay and Jobs was the key acquihire at Next, before people started talking about “acquihire” as a concept. Unfortunately, Apple wasn’t going to acquire both Be and Next.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48125144&quot; title=&quot;Be was pretty close from being acquired by Apple instead of NeXT. It was also founded by an ex-Apple employee (Jean-Louis Gassée). MacOSX would be really different today if it were based on BeOS instead of NeXT...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users still seek to bridge this gap through projects like Vitruvian OS, which attempts to run the Haiku user space on a Linux kernel &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124834&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s an interesting fork that recently cropped up. It takes the Haiku user space and places it atop the Linux kernel. Vitruvian OS: https://v-os.dev/&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/commentary/2026/05/12/just-days-tribune-reporting/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Making the news available at no cost is a victory&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sltrib.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48126156&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;122 points · 120 comments · by danso&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Salt Lake Tribune is removing its paywall and will make its journalism free to read online starting this Thursday. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/commentary/2026/05/12/just-days-tribune-reporting/&quot; title=&quot;Robert Gehrke: Making the news available at no cost is a massive victory    Folks, it&amp;#39;s happening. The Salt Lake Tribune&amp;#39;s journalism will be free to read starting Thursday. Read all about it here — and how you can support us in this new phase.    ![Close ad](data:image/svg+xml;base64...)    # Robert Gehrke: Making the news available at no cost is a massive victory    ## The news will be free to read at sltrib.com starting Thursday.    (Francisco Kjolseth | The Salt Lake Tribune) The Salt Lake Tribune…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The transition to &amp;#34;free&amp;#34; news raises significant concerns regarding how to fund high-quality reporting without compromising impartiality or succumbing to the influence of advertisers and donors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48126326&quot; title=&quot;The &amp;#39;Free News&amp;#39; model is certainly something I&amp;#39;ve struggled to solve. How exactly can you provide impartial, objective reporting when you cant afford the salaries? If the people arent interested in paying... what else can you do?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48126547&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s an even more fundamental problem: even if you can pay the salaries, how do you ensure that your organization remains aligned with the original goal? How do you prevent it from being subtly influenced by the confluence of interests it will be exposed to by virtue of wielding influence? How do you defend against less than subtle interests? Note that charging for the news does not defend you against this.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48126329&quot; title=&quot;Making newsrooms beholden to donors is not ideal, but it&amp;#39;s better than being beholden to advertisers.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest that micropayments could provide a sustainable revenue stream, others argue this model has historically failed because consumers are reluctant to pay for content that often makes them &amp;#34;miserable&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48126734&quot; title=&quot;It’s unfortunate we haven’t solved the micro-payment problem. Crypto was an obvious solution but anything would require a hefty network effect. But imagine like a starbucks card or whatever you have your micropayment card, and it auto reloads when it hits zero with 20 bucks or whatever. When you visit the  times, a modal pops up, “This article costs $0.02. Read it? y/n or $1 for a day pass”. Sure pirates will get around it but they already do. Just make it grandma easy and you’re done. It’s…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48126823&quot; title=&quot;That model doesn&amp;#39;t really work, unfortunately: https://www.amediaoperator.com/newsletter/microtransactions-... It has been tried a bunch of times. I think a core problem is unlike most micro transaction opportunities you&amp;#39;re asking customers to pay money to be told bad news. To buy something that will make them miserable. There&amp;#39;s a fundamental disconnect there that means people aren&amp;#39;t going to be inclined to do it.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a notable debate over objectivity: some users advocate for newsrooms to abandon the &amp;#34;impossible task&amp;#34; of impartiality in favor of radical transparency about their inherent biases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48127013&quot; title=&quot;Many people think you should avoid having bias. That may be the correct thing in some circumstances, but I think it&amp;#39;s better to intentionally have bias, to make that bias explicit, and then to intentionally work within the framework provided by that bias. It should be open, public, and visible. This allows for full transparency with the audience, increasing trust, while also giving a public &amp;#39;anchor&amp;#39; to guage your work against. Many organizations do just this. Outside of news it&amp;#39;s often just…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48127058&quot; title=&quot;Don&amp;#39;t try to be &amp;#39;objective&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;impartial.&amp;#39; That&amp;#39;s an impossible task, and anyone claiming to do so is being dishonest. Instead, own your biases. Make them explicit and public. That way people can understand were you&amp;#39;re coming from, and take that into account. There will always be bias in any reporting. It&amp;#39;s better to make it visible than to pretend it doesn&amp;#39;t exist. This means having a clear perspective and &amp;#39;owning&amp;#39; that perspective, instead of shying away from it. Coincidentally, this type of…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, while others warn that such explicit bias can be misleading &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48127044&quot; title=&quot;On the other hand, some claim that biased news sources can be  misleading.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Alternative funding models, such as government-mandated &amp;#34;journalism taxes&amp;#34; or state subsidies, face criticism for potentially creating media outlets that fear criticizing the government &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48127043&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think the following is a great idea for many reasons, but it&amp;#39;s an idea that has been on my mind for a while and I&amp;#39;d like to share it to hear some thoughts: Germany has (used to have? I don&amp;#39;t follow this closely) the &amp;#39;church tax&amp;#39;: citizens are obligated to pay the tax no matter how much faith they have, but are free to channel it to a denomination/organization they believe in. Maybe a liberal, democratic state could successfully build something similar for news organizations: all…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48126733&quot; title=&quot;As a Canadian with &amp;#39;free news&amp;#39; it&amp;#39;s not great. You get media outlets that almost never criticize the government for fear of getting defunded. We saw this with the lack of coverage on major bills just yesterday.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-12</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-12</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://googlebook.google/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Googlebook&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (googlebook.google)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48111545&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;931 points · &lt;strong&gt;1561 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by tambourine_man&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google has introduced Googlebook, a new category of laptops designed to bridge the gap between mobile and desktop computing. &lt;a href=&quot;https://googlebook.google/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.reddit.com&amp;amp;#x2F;r&amp;amp;#x2F;Android&amp;amp;#x2F;comments&amp;amp;#x2F;1tb8xls&amp;amp;#x2F;introducing_googlebook_a_new_category_of_laptops&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.reddit.com&amp;amp;#x2F;r&amp;amp;#x2F;Android&amp;amp;#x2F;comments&amp;amp;#x2F;1tb8xls&amp;amp;#x2F;introducin...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#34;Googlebook&amp;#34; announcement has sparked criticism regarding Google’s marketing, with users arguing that AI-driven features like clothes shopping feel disconnected from real consumer needs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113491&quot; title=&quot;Gross. This is just more proof that corporations simply don&amp;#39;t know how to market AI. Everything is an ad for an ad at this point. The very first thing they show this new machine doing is helping people shop for clothes using AI. No one is doing that, these people don&amp;#39;t exist. No matter how hard corporate America wishes they did. This is why AI doesn&amp;#39;t sell. This is why companies like Microsoft and Dell are pulling back on their AI claims and why Apple has nearly wiped it off their site all…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters find niche utility in using AI to scrape specific clothing sizes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113663&quot; title=&quot;Huh, I shopped for clothes using AI today. Not super relevant to the Googlebook ad, but in case the perspective is interesting to you: I&amp;#39;m quite tall (194cm) but not very wide, so I usually struggle with buying clothes online. I used AI to scrape a bunch of clothing stores to see whether they sold a men&amp;#39;s shirt with an LT or slim fit size, in stock, and matching a particular vibe.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others dismiss these use cases as exceptions that will likely just funnel users toward major retailers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113923&quot; title=&quot;This is kinda the exception that proves the rule. I can imagine lots of cases where people with specific needs would find benefit from the “AI clothes buying” experience, but I will bet you anything that any searches you try to do will lead you to the same half-dozen giant mail-order clothing vendors that everyone already knows about.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also highlights a lack of brand appeal and trust, citing Google’s history of killing products &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113295&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s funny is that these days if I see a Google product that I&amp;#39;m even remotely interested in, I just immediately write it off because I know it&amp;#39;s something they will kill in a very short time frame. It&amp;#39;s just never worth the hassle of buying/using a Google product. Never.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, poor repairability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48112592&quot; title=&quot;I attended Google I/O in 2013 and was given a Chromebook Pixel, their $1300 laptop. The hardware was very, very nice, and I quite enjoyed using it for a while. One day, I dropped it and damaged the screen well outside of its warranty period. &amp;#39;Oh no,&amp;#39; I thought. &amp;#39;This is probably going to be pretty expensive to fix.&amp;#39; So, bracing for the damage, I called up Google and told them what had happened. They replied that there was no fixing it. They would replace the laptops under the warranty, but…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, and a &amp;#34;cringe&amp;#34; naming convention that may alienate younger audiences &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48111926&quot; title=&quot;I think if I wanted a cheap laptop I&amp;#39;d probably get the macbook neo, and if i wanted a non-gaming expensive one i&amp;#39;d get a macbook pro. I really don&amp;#39;t see the market fit for this, I guess the android integration. But my god, I&amp;#39;d die of cringe if someone asked me about my laptop and I had to say &amp;#39;googlebook&amp;#39;. Believe it or not, these things matter a lot, particularly if you&amp;#39;re trying to target a young audience.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these concerns, some loyal ChromeOS users remain interested in the high-end hardware, provided the support lifecycle is clearly defined &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48112214&quot; title=&quot;Chromebook users. I loved my Pixelbook, fantastic piece of hardware. When that ended, I went with an Acer Chromebook. Works fine, just not the same. I would go for a Mac Air or Neo, but only if I could install ChromeOS. I will most likely get a Googlebook, and would be more likely to do so if it was not named Googlebook and did not have Gemini built in.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113392&quot; title=&quot;Their hardware is usually fine when it comes to support. Google announces the support lifetime of their devices and sticks to it, with feature updates coming to things like phones even after the support period ended through things like app stores. Just check the support lifetime of the device before buying (early Pixels only had 2 years of support, as was announced at release). Their cloud services are nothing but hot air but their hardware support has been excellent for the past few years.…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/bambu-lab-abusing-open-source-social-contract/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bambu Lab is abusing the open source social contract&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jeffgeerling.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48109224&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1397 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 427 comments · by rubenbe&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bambu Lab is facing criticism for threatening legal action against the developer of an open-source OrcaSlicer fork that allowed users to bypass the company&amp;#39;s cloud-only printing requirements using Bambu&amp;#39;s own AGPL-licensed code. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/bambu-lab-abusing-open-source-social-contract/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Bambu Lab is abusing the open source social contract    URL Source: https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/bambu-lab-abusing-open-source-social-contract/    Published Time: 2026-05-12T09:00:00-05:00    Markdown Content:  # Bambu Lab is abusing the open source social contract - Jeff Geerling    [Jeff…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bambu Lab is facing criticism for attempting to restrict third-party software access to its cloud services by using user-agent strings as a security measure, a move critics argue conflates metadata with actual authentication &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48109674&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;It pretended to be the official client&amp;#39; is not a security argument if the mechanism was client-supplied metadata. That’s not impersonation. That’s Bambu discovering that user agents are not authentication.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48110520&quot; title=&quot;This sentence in Bambu Lab&amp;#39;s blog post is wild: &amp;gt; We have documented incidents of service outages caused precisely by spikes in unauthorized traffic - overwhelming the servers, causing service disruptions affecting everyone. The cost was instability felt by all users. So it&amp;#39;s a problem that their printers are popular, and they can&amp;#39;t be bothered to scale their infra, so let&amp;#39;s gate everything based on USER AGENT STRING!  This is so crazy of an excuse that I don&amp;#39;t believe it.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While the company claims these restrictions prevent server instability, others point out that as an AGPL-licensed project, the software should be usable as the community sees fit, though Bambu retains the right to control its own servers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48109726&quot; title=&quot;And by using AGPL they grant you the license to use the code however you wish, they cannot say it&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;unauthorized access&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48109876&quot; title=&quot;Yes you can use the code however you want but equally they are free to bar anyone they wish from accessing their servers. These are completely orthogonal issues in a legal sense.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48110520&quot; title=&quot;This sentence in Bambu Lab&amp;#39;s blog post is wild: &amp;gt; We have documented incidents of service outages caused precisely by spikes in unauthorized traffic - overwhelming the servers, causing service disruptions affecting everyone. The cost was instability felt by all users. So it&amp;#39;s a problem that their printers are popular, and they can&amp;#39;t be bothered to scale their infra, so let&amp;#39;s gate everything based on USER AGENT STRING!  This is so crazy of an excuse that I don&amp;#39;t believe it.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Users seeking &amp;#34;open&amp;#34; alternatives often recommend Prusa, though some note that even Prusa has recently moved toward more restrictive licensing to prevent commercial exploitation of their R&amp;amp;D &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48109711&quot; title=&quot;Full disclosure: I&amp;#39;ve never owned a Bambu because I&amp;#39;ve never loved the idea of a &amp;#39;closed&amp;#39; ecosystem 3D printer, however I have used them, and am very familiar with the 3d printing space beyond Bambu. For anyone considering alternatives: You should know that almost all other 3D printers expect you to know a little more about how they actually work than Bambus. Bambus are as close as you can get to a &amp;#39;just works&amp;#39; type experience, but modern alternatives from others are nowhere near as hard as…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48109894&quot; title=&quot;Prusa is still the most &amp;#39;open source-ish&amp;#39; choice, but they&amp;#39;re no longer a polar opposite to Bambu, in 2023 they started making efforts to stop commercialization of their designs, stopped sharing source/design material for their PCBs, etc. Then in 2025 they changed their &amp;#39;open community license&amp;#39; to say users may not: “Sell complete machines or remixes based on these files, unless you have a separate agreement…” and “The Restriction: You cannot commercially exploit the design files…”…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the controversy, some owners find the hardware can still be operated privately by blocking internet access and using open-source forks like OrcaSlicer &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48110704&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m an open-source advocate (some would say zealot?) but I ended up buying a Bambu P1S a few months back because my research indicated that there were ways use it normally without creating a Bambu account, or using their slicer, or having to send all of your prints through their servers. I don&amp;#39;t have my notes in front of me, but I managed to do all of that with hardly any trouble at all. IIRC, you only had to change one setting on the printer itself, and optionally block the printer from…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nair.sh/guides-and-opinions/communicating-your-expertise/why-senior-developers-fail-to-communicate-their-expertise&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why senior developers fail to communicate their expertise&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nair.sh)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48109460&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;819 points · 330 comments · by nilirl&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Senior developers often fail to communicate because they focus on managing technical complexity while the rest of the business prioritizes reducing market uncertainty. To bridge this gap, developers should frame their expertise as a solution for speed and stability by proposing &amp;#34;quicker&amp;#34; alternatives and decoupling rapid prototyping from scalable systems. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nair.sh/guides-and-opinions/communicating-your-expertise/why-senior-developers-fail-to-communicate-their-expertise&quot; title=&quot;Title: Why senior developers fail to communicate their expertise    URL Source: https://www.nair.sh/guides-and-opinions/communicating-your-expertise/why-senior-developers-fail-to-communicate-their-expertise    Markdown Content:  # Why senior developers fail to communicate their expertise | nair.sh    [nair.sh](https://www.nair.sh/)[Buy my new book Copywriting after AI](https://www.nair.sh/books/copywriting-after-ai)    Open menu    *   [10x Cold Content…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The difficulty in communicating senior expertise stems from the fact that it is often rooted in an internal &amp;#34;world model&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;theory&amp;#34; that cannot be directly transferred through words alone &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113129&quot; title=&quot;Because the most important parts of the expertise are coming from their internal &amp;#39;world model&amp;#39; and are inseparable from it. An average unaware person believes that anything can be put in words and once the words are said, they mean to reader what the sayer meant, and the only difficulty could come from not knowing the words or mistaking ambiguities. The request to take a dev and &amp;#39;communicate&amp;#39; their expertise to another is based on this belief. And because this belief is wrong, the attempt to…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48115431&quot; title=&quot;By complete coincidence, yesterday I came across this link to an article Peter Naur wrote in 1985 ( https://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~remzi/Naur.pdf ) which I haven&amp;#39;t been able to stop thinking about. I&amp;#39;ve been doing this for coming up on thirty years now, mostly at one large company, and I spent a significant number of hours every week fielding questions from people who are newer at it who are having trouble with one thing or another. Often I can tell immediately from the question that the root of…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some seniors argue that their attempts to mentor are frequently met with disinterest from junior developers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48112672&quot; title=&quot;What I found is that my willingness to communicate and share my expertise is usually not in demand with more junior developers. In general, I find developers uninterested in finding a mentor. They don&amp;#39;t look at your linked in profile, they don&amp;#39;t look at you as a possible source of knowledge and expertise. So it&amp;#39;s not like I have nothing to share after 30 years of experience in the industry, I just have nobody to share it with.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others emphasize that true seniority involves navigating complex trade-offs across multiple dimensions like maintainability and resilience rather than just following rigid rules &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48111182&quot; title=&quot;As a /senior/ developer I really dislike blanket statements. I&amp;#39;ve seen the same amount of failures caused by &amp;gt; “Do we really need that?”  &amp;gt; “What happens if we don’t do this?”  &amp;gt; “Can we make do for now? Maybe come back to this later when it becomes more important?” as with experimenters. Every system is different, every product is different. If I were building firmware for a CT scanner, my approach towards trying out new things would be different than a CRUD SaaS with 100 clients in a field that…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48111749&quot; title=&quot;Complexity, if it can be reduced to a single measurable dimension, is only one of several factors in a solution space. There are other properties such as, maintainability, scalability, reliability, resilience, anti-fragility, extensibility, versatility, durability, composability. Not all apply. Being able to talk about tradeoffs in terms of solution spaces, not just along a single dimension, is one of what I consider the differentiator between a senior and staff+ developer.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, effective communication requires seniors to translate their mental models into symbolic representations that help others build their own understanding through experience &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48115431&quot; title=&quot;By complete coincidence, yesterday I came across this link to an article Peter Naur wrote in 1985 ( https://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~remzi/Naur.pdf ) which I haven&amp;#39;t been able to stop thinking about. I&amp;#39;ve been doing this for coming up on thirty years now, mostly at one large company, and I spent a significant number of hours every week fielding questions from people who are newer at it who are having trouble with one thing or another. Often I can tell immediately from the question that the root of…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.typewritten.org/Media/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Screenshots of Old Desktop OSes&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (typewritten.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48104428&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;707 points · 393 comments · by adunk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Typewritten Software&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;Retrotechnology Media&amp;#34; exhibit provides a chronological collection of screenshots from vintage operating systems and graphical interfaces spanning 1983 to 1998, featuring rare systems like Visi On, NeXTstep, BeOS, and various Unix workstations. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.typewritten.org/Media/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Retrotechnology Media - Typewritten Software    URL Source: http://www.typewritten.org/Media/    Published Time: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 09:05:58 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Retrotechnology Media - Typewritten Software    # Retrotechnology Media    ![Image 1](http://www.typewritten.org/ts-logo.gif)    10 March 2024    # Images    ## Operating Exhibits    [![Image 2](http://www.typewritten.org/Media/Thumbs/thn-visi-on-1.0.png)](http://www.typewritten.org/Media/Images/visi-on-1.0.png)     1983 • 640 × 400 PNG (6…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users express a strong sense of loss regarding the decline of research-based UX, citing the disappearance of clear affordances like visible scrollbars, distinct buttons, and colored title bars for active windows &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48105607&quot; title=&quot;I can&amp;#39;t help thinking about how much we have lost. Just finding the scrollbar nowadays can be a challenge. Not to mention if you want to resize a pane - in some applications they seem to have taken extra steps to make it difficult to find the line to grab.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48106099&quot; title=&quot;Operating systems of that era were designed based on UX research to help people use the unfamiliar operating system. Subsequent ones were designed by UI designers, and opinionated senior managers, who already knew how to use them, and took out usability features to make them &amp;#39;look nicer&amp;#39;. This sort of worked when the opinionated manager was Steve Jobs. Most managers are not Steve Jobs. &amp;gt; in some applications they seem to have taken extra steps to make it difficult to find the line to grab Pet…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48106602&quot; title=&quot;We also lost clearly identifiable buttons, loading bars (replaced with throbbers), status bars that tell you what you&amp;#39;re hovering over and what the program is doing, stable UIs to develop muscle memory, etc. But we did gain some nice things! - Tabs. - Titlebar buttons and other space-saving measures. - Document editors remembering unsaved changes. - Forms that validate on focus lost, instead of submission. - Ctrl+P menus to fuzzy-search all actions and settings (we need more of those). - Easy…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that modern OSes have introduced valuable features like universal search, easy syncing, and robust package managers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48106602&quot; title=&quot;We also lost clearly identifiable buttons, loading bars (replaced with throbbers), status bars that tell you what you&amp;#39;re hovering over and what the program is doing, stable UIs to develop muscle memory, etc. But we did gain some nice things! - Tabs. - Titlebar buttons and other space-saving measures. - Document editors remembering unsaved changes. - Forms that validate on focus lost, instead of submission. - Ctrl+P menus to fuzzy-search all actions and settings (we need more of those). - Easy…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that current designs prioritize aesthetics over usability, often resulting in &amp;#34;one-pixel&amp;#34; grab areas and hidden menus that frustrate even technical users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48106099&quot; title=&quot;Operating systems of that era were designed based on UX research to help people use the unfamiliar operating system. Subsequent ones were designed by UI designers, and opinionated senior managers, who already knew how to use them, and took out usability features to make them &amp;#39;look nicer&amp;#39;. This sort of worked when the opinionated manager was Steve Jobs. Most managers are not Steve Jobs. &amp;gt; in some applications they seem to have taken extra steps to make it difficult to find the line to grab Pet…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48109891&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Too many developers nowadays don&amp;#39;t know this. Guess they&amp;#39;ve never been on the phone with an elderly relative in tears because she can&amp;#39;t figure out basic tasks on an iPad anymore after years of learning how. That&amp;#39;s when you realize you, as a highly-skilled technical person, can&amp;#39;t either, because they&amp;#39;ve moved, hidden, or otherwise obfuscated them. Yesterday I learned there are two icons in the Files app called &amp;#39;...&amp;#39; Yes, two. Incidentally I was looking for how to delete a file, which is now…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some attribute this nostalgia to a preference for the simplicity of youth &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48106112&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s a lot of nostalgia in the comments here. I wonder if any reader under say 25 is willing to comment; do you think OS&amp;#39;s today are a regression? do those look better? To me they look unwieldy, heavy and overwhelming and I can&amp;#39;t help but think the love for them is just the love for youth or whatever&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest that modern power-user shortcuts can mitigate some of these regressions in window management &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48107990&quot; title=&quot;If that&amp;#39;s a problem for you, you have much to gain with better window management shortcuts. On KDE I have the Windows key + left click set to drag a window from anywhere , and win + right click to resize depending on the quadrant the cursor is on. It&amp;#39;s incredibly satisfying not having to hunt titlebar empty spaces or thin edges.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/12/tiktok-instagram-social-media-addictive-eu-crack-down.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;EU to crack down on TikTok, Instagram&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;addictive design&amp;#39; targeting kids&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cnbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48106534&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;514 points · 468 comments · by thm&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The European Commission plans to introduce regulations later this year targeting &amp;#34;addictive design&amp;#34; features on TikTok and Instagram, such as endless scrolling and autoplay, to protect children from online harms and enforce minimum age requirements. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/12/tiktok-instagram-social-media-addictive-eu-crack-down.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: EU to crack down on TikTok, Instagram&amp;#39;s ‘addictive design’ targeting kids on social media    URL Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/12/tiktok-instagram-social-media-addictive-eu-crack-down.html    Published Time: 2026-05-12T09:20:12+0000    Markdown Content:  # EU to crack down on TikTok, Instagram ‘addictive design’ hooking kids    [Skip Navigation](https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/12/tiktok-instagram-social-media-addictive-eu-crack-down.html#MainContent)    [![Image 3: CNBC…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether social media algorithms should be regulated like &amp;#34;modern-day cigarettes&amp;#34; due to their intentionally addictive nature &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48108059&quot; title=&quot;I heard someone on a podcast call social media algorithms &amp;#39;the modern-day cigarette&amp;#39; and that really resonated with me. These companies know their product is addictive and bad for users, but they keep pushing it anyways. Like cigarettes, it&amp;#39;s bad for everyone, not just kids. I made an algorithm blocker for Safari because of that and it&amp;#39;s actually crazy how much more pleasant social media is if you don&amp;#39;t have recommendation algorithms at all. I think the EU and other jurisdictions should really…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48108277&quot; title=&quot;The modern-day cigarette is such a perfect metaphor for social media. A cabal of unfathomably wealthy companies spreading their harmful products across the world; making them as addictive as possible while actively burying the research which proves how harmful they are. I truly hope one day we&amp;#39;ll look back on social media and smartphone use the same way we regard smoking.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest stripping platforms of liability protections if they use algorithmic curation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48107105&quot; title=&quot;This is pretty easy to solve. If you present data by algorithm, you are no longer an impartial common carrier and are liable for the content you present. If the user decides you don’t, ala social media 1.0.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue this would effectively destroy the open internet by making sites legally responsible for all user-generated content &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48107803&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If you present data by algorithm, you are no longer an impartial common carrier and are liable for the content you present Hacker News is a site that presents data by algorithm. Under your definition, Hacker News goes away, too. A more accurate framing would be that they’re going after personalized recommendation algorithms. It’s not obvious that offering a recommendation algorithm would mean that the site is no longer an impartial common carrier.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48107991&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Goes away, or is liable for the content promoted to the frontpage under the OP&amp;#39;s take? Same thing. There is no Hacker News if Y Combinator becomes liable for user submitted content. It’s an obvious backdoor play to make sites go away. If a site becomes liable for content posted, you cannot allow users to post content without having the site review and take responsibility for every comment and every post. The people proposing it haven’t considered how damaging that would be for the ability of…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics also highlight the immense difficulty in legally defining &amp;#34;algorithm&amp;#34; without inadvertently banning basic functions like search ranking, infinite scroll, or chronological feeds &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48107596&quot; title=&quot;So the user opens the app - what is the first video you show them? How does &amp;#39;the user decide&amp;#39; from the millions upon millions of videos there are? If the user can search like in Youtube then how do you rank the results? That&amp;#39;s also an algorithm. It isn&amp;#39;t pretty easy to solve at all.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48107162&quot; title=&quot;This is one of those things that don’t translate to legal reality very well, as then you have to define “what is an algorithm”. Is adding advertisements an algorithm? Is including likes an algorithm? Is automatically starting the next video after a previous one has finished an algorithm? Is infinite scroll an algorithm? Etc&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these complexities, there is a strong sentiment that these protections should extend to adults, though some users remain wary of granting governments the power to decide what content they can consume &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48107134&quot; title=&quot;I don’t think this is only a kids issue. A lot of adults need this too. The addictive apps are very well designed, while most blockers are either too easy to ignore or too annoying to keep using. I built a small iOS blocker because I had the same problem. Making it strict enough to actually work without making people hate it is the main challenge.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48107440&quot; title=&quot;As an adult, who despises all those apps, I don&amp;#39;t want to grant government the power to make that decision for me.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/cactus-compute/needle&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Needle: We Distilled Gemini Tool Calling into a 26M Model&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48111896&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;768 points · 210 comments · by HenryNdubuaku&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cactus has open-sourced Needle, a 26-million parameter model designed for high-speed tool calling on consumer devices like phones and wearables by utilizing a specialized &amp;#34;no-MLP&amp;#34; architecture. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/cactus-compute/needle&quot; title=&quot;Hey HN, Henry here from Cactus. We open-sourced Needle, a 26M parameter function-calling (tool use) model. It runs at 6000 tok&amp;amp;#x2F;s prefill and 1200 tok&amp;amp;#x2F;s decode on consumer devices.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;We were always frustrated by the little effort made towards building agentic models that run on budget phones, so we conducted investigations that led to an observation: agentic experiences are built upon tool calling, and massive models are overkill for it. Tool calling is fundamentally…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the utility and legality of a 26M parameter model designed for tool-calling, with users suggesting a live demo or video to better showcase its capabilities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113387&quot; title=&quot;Suggestion: publish a live demo of the &amp;#39;needle playground&amp;#39;. It&amp;#39;s small enough that it should be pretty cheap to run this on a little VPS somewhere!&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113469&quot; title=&quot;thanks, yeah, the problem is just handling scale, we don&amp;#39;t have the infra ready to go, but anyone can do that. Its easy for people to run on their laptops straight up. Will try the VPS route.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113494&quot; title=&quot;Alternatively, record a video that showcases it.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113514&quot; title=&quot;Ok, will do that now!&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While the creators envision the model enabling agentic features on small devices like smartwatches and glasses &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48115283&quot; title=&quot;It is for building agentic capabilities into very small devices like phones, glasses, watches and more. Does that make sense?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, some commenters remain skeptical about practical mobile use cases and the clarity of the &amp;#34;M&amp;#34; vs &amp;#34;B&amp;#34; parameter scale &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113889&quot; title=&quot;That M versus B is way too subtle. 0.026B is my suggestion&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48115220&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t really understand what this is for... there is a lot of ML-researcher talk on the GH page about the model architecture, but how should I use it? Is it a replacement for Kimi 2.7, Claude Haiku, Gemini Flash 3.1 lite, a conversational LLM for the situations where it&amp;#39;s mostly tool-calling like coding and conversational AI?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48115763&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m having trouble understanding why someone would want that? Like, what are the product use-cases of such a thing? I understand why people want that for coding agents--although the jury is still very much out on whether those are terribly useful--but I cannot fathom what someone might want an agent to do on a cell phone? Is there some user-facing activity on a phone that&amp;#39;s similar to coding with a tight, objectively measurable feedback loop (analogous to dev/compile/test)? EDIT: more of you…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48115401&quot; title=&quot;Not noticing the difference between an M and B (as a software engineer, no less) seems more like a you problem&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, a notable concern was raised regarding whether distilling Gemini violates Google’s Terms of Service &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113596&quot; title=&quot;FYI, distilling Gemini is explicitly against the ToS: &amp;#39;You may not use the Services to develop models that compete with the Services (e.g., Gemini API or Google AI Studio). You also may not attempt to reverse engineer, extract or replicate any component of the Services, including the underlying data or models (e.g., parameter weights).&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/FULU-Foundation/OrcaSlicer-bambulab&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Restore full BambuNetwork support for Bambu Lab printers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48115127&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;669 points · 309 comments · by Murfalo&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FULU Foundation has released a version of OrcaSlicer that restores full BambuNetwork support for Bambu Lab printers, allowing users to print over the internet rather than being limited to LAN-only connections. The software is currently available for Windows and Linux, with a macOS version in development. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/FULU-Foundation/OrcaSlicer-bambulab&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - FULU-Foundation/OrcaSlicer-bambulab    URL Source: https://github.com/FULU-Foundation/OrcaSlicer-bambulab    Markdown Content:  # GitHub - FULU-Foundation/OrcaSlicer-bambulab · GitHub    [Skip to content](https://github.com/FULU-Foundation/OrcaSlicer-bambulab#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [](https://github.com/)    [Sign in](https://github.com/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FFULU-Foundation%2FOrcaSlicer-bambulab)    Appearance settings    *     Platform    …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on Bambu Lab&amp;#39;s restrictive firmware, which forces users to choose between &amp;#34;Cloud mode&amp;#34; for remote monitoring and &amp;#34;LAN mode&amp;#34; for local printing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48115890&quot; title=&quot;This looks to be a clone of the prior state of the repository that caused all the Bambu drama earlier this week. I did a ton of research because I didn&amp;#39;t understand what people wanted here, and this is what&amp;#39;s going on: Right now, Bambu have adjusted their system into two modalities: * &amp;#39;default&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;Cloud&amp;#39; mode, where you get an app, remote monitoring, but you have to use Bambu Studio or Bambu Connect to send prints. They implemented this by adding cloud auth to their &amp;#39;internal API;&amp;#39; the client…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue this is an artificial limitation designed to mandate cloud connectivity, raising significant concerns regarding security, data harvesting, and potential corporate espionage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48116180&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This isn&amp;#39;t actually possible This is only true due to a firmware they pushed last year. It&amp;#39;s an artificial limit. There&amp;#39;s no reason at all a local client couldn&amp;#39;t just talk to a local printer without any cloud. Every problem BambuLabs have here is self-inflicted. They could allow simultaneous cloud and local queue management with or without authentication.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48115815&quot; title=&quot;If Bambu Lab responds to this criticism with lawyers instead of clear technical answers, it will only make the forced cloud requirement look more suspicious. To me, this is an obvious security risk. These printers are often used in labs, startups, engineering teams, and potentially even government environments. If print data, models, logs, or usage patterns are routed through a company controlled infrastructure, that creates a real opportunity for corporate espionage or data harvesting. I would…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users advocate for air-gapping the devices or switching to open-source alternatives like Prusa, others defend the company&amp;#39;s right to enforce its license agreements despite the community&amp;#39;s desire for simultaneous local and cloud functionality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48117361&quot; title=&quot;Sure, but it&amp;#39;s their right to enact that restriction on their software.   There are more open alternatives like Prusa , Elgoo, or Creality if people prefer a more open/freedom approach.  On the other hand, Bambu has a reputation for having most of the best products in the space. Of course, many prefer to break their license agreement because They Really Want It, in effect daring Bambu to get aggressive with license enforcement.  They probably won&amp;#39;t...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48115869&quot; title=&quot;I’ve been running mine offline for years, I don’t know why other people haven’t been. They’re the only competent and reliable printer that isn’t a project car in itself, but they’re obviously not completely trustworthy. Easily fixed with an air gap, updates work just great from a USB drive.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48117388&quot; title=&quot;It is my right to do with my printer whatever I want.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/05/drop-database-what-not-to-do-after-losing-an-it-job/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Twin brothers wipe 96 government databases minutes after being fired&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (arstechnica.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48115438&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;488 points · 431 comments · by jnord&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Twin brothers Muneeb and Sohaib Akhter were convicted after using active credentials to delete 96 government databases immediately following their termination from a federal contractor. The brothers, who had prior criminal records, were caught after inadvertently recording their own incriminating conversations on a Microsoft Teams call. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/05/drop-database-what-not-to-do-after-losing-an-it-job/&quot; title=&quot;Twin brothers wipe 96 gov&amp;#39;t databases minutes after being fired    A case study in why credentials are revoked before firings.    [Skip to content](#main)  [Ars Technica home](https://arstechnica.com/)    Sections    [Forum](/civis/)[Subscribe](/subscribe/)[Search](/search/)    * [AI](https://arstechnica.com/ai/)  * [Biz &amp;amp; IT](https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/)  * [Cars](https://arstechnica.com/cars/)  * [Culture](https://arstechnica.com/culture/)  * [Gaming](https://arstechnica.com/gaming/)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The consensus among commenters is that immediate termination of system access during firing is a standard, necessary security practice, with some arguing that failing to do so constitutes professional incompetence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128442&quot; title=&quot;Terminating access and rotating passwords (if needed) while the person is in the meeting but has not yet found out they are being let go has been SOP for at least the last 20 years&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48125995&quot; title=&quot;When you are talking about access like they had &amp;#39;make firings as abrupt as possible including terminating all access immediately&amp;#39; not doing this is incompetence. This is absolutely a standard and has to be for these kinds of positions. I&amp;#39;ve never worked anywhere where it wasn&amp;#39;t for the majority of IT staff. You meet with HR, someone clears your desk, and security walks you out.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others criticize this approach as dehumanizing and &amp;#34;inhumane&amp;#34; compared to international norms where employees may stay on for months to transition knowledge &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48125818&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; [Opexus] said that “the individuals responsible for hiring the twins are no longer employed by Opexus.” Getting close to the classic Monty Python line: &amp;#39;Those responsible for sacking the people who have just been sacked, have been sacked.&amp;#39; Jokes aside, stuff like this sucks because I suspect many employers will take from it the most extreme, dehumanizing lessons, e.g.: (a) make firings [edit: including lay-offs] as abrupt as possible including terminating all access immediately, (b) never…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128624&quot; title=&quot;If you don&amp;#39;t trust your people so much, why to hire them in a first place? Looking at it from Europe - it is such a weird inhumane practice. Someone decided your position is redundant. Okay, shit happens, economic downturn, etc. Then you have extra 3-6 months of work to pass your knowledge, train replacement and document everything.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights significant technical failures in this case, specifically questioning how the brothers accessed 5,000 passwords and why they were able to run destructive commands without oversight &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48126099&quot; title=&quot;How did they get access to 5k passwords? Are they being sent/stored in cleartext? This is the most baffling part of the article for me. The second part I&amp;#39;m unclear about is how you could pass SOC2 when you aren&amp;#39;t terminating account access simultaneously with the employment termination.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48116355&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; At 4:58 pm, he wiped out a Department of Homeland Security database using the command “DROP DATABASE dhsproddb.” This article is hilarious. The two bickering brothers remind me of the guys in the Oceans movies played by Casey Affleck and Scott Caan. It’s amazing they got this close to sensitive data.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48126296&quot; title=&quot;And how exactly do you want to store passwords if not in plain text (and then encrypted of course)? 5k is a lot, the authorization process is broken, but this is not related to how the passwords are stored. The only solution is correct access segregation and a bastion&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/davmlaw/they_live_adblocker&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;They Live (1988) inspired Adblocker&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48102700&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;562 points · 191 comments · by tokenburner&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer has created a fork of uBlock Origin Lite that replaces blocked advertisements with slogans from the 1988 film *They Live*, such as &amp;#34;OBEY&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;CONSUME,&amp;#34; instead of simply hiding them. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/davmlaw/they_live_adblocker&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - davmlaw/they_live_adblocker: Replace Ads with They Live style slogans    URL Source: https://github.com/davmlaw/they_live_adblocker    Markdown Content:  # GitHub - davmlaw/they_live_adblocker: Replace Ads with They Live style slogans · GitHub    [Skip to content](https://github.com/davmlaw/they_live_adblocker#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [](https://github.com/)    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters highlight *They Live* as a formative influence that encourages skepticism of authority and resistance to groupthink, though they note the film&amp;#39;s message is often co-opted by wildly different ideologies, including far-right conspiracy theories &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48104075&quot; title=&quot;Watch it if you haven&amp;#39;t already.  I accidentally landed in the middle of it while doing some illicit late night channel surfing when I was a kid.. this left quite an impression. I think it was a healthy formative influence for me and primed me for rejecting fads / peer pressure, distrusting authority, etc.  Probably also helped me to resist the more unhealthy aspects of a religious time/place, and I was even doing light reading on Cartesian skepticism a few years later, which got me into math. …&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48104466&quot; title=&quot;What I find funny (only not really) is the wildly different interpretations of this film people have, for many they seem to be primed by other things to see in it what they want. Basically skeptical of common forms in modernity, that is very clearly the intention. However, I have also seen that in extreme far-right communities this film represents how Jewish people control the world... somehow I don&amp;#39;t think that is what Carpenter was going for. Alas, once your works are in the wild it is out of…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48104563&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s interesting right?  Now there&amp;#39;s too much distrust of authority and also not enough.  Even the word &amp;#39;skeptic&amp;#39; is sometimes used to refer to people who &amp;#39;do their own research&amp;#39; and doggedly latch on to wild conspiracy theories. Avoiding groupthink is another slightly different positive spin on (my read of) the underlying message.  There&amp;#39;s such a thing as toxic individualism too, but if there&amp;#39;s a &amp;#39;bad&amp;#39; way to be a free-thinker then you could say it usually has a pretty limited blast radius for…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While the movie famously inspired early Mozilla branding, users debated the irony of using AI to develop an adblocker based on a film centered on dehumanization and alienation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48104594&quot; title=&quot;Oh the irony: &amp;#39;They Live&amp;#39;, a movie famously about alienation and dehumanization, and you let AI do all the coding.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48108850&quot; title=&quot;Misread the title to mean that They Live inspired the concept of adblocking in general. Which would have been an interesting coincidence, since it did inspire one of the early Mozilla logos. [0] [0] https://www.jwz.org/blog/2016/10/they-live-and-the-secret-hi...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these modern interpretations, the film remains a celebrated cult classic for its &amp;#34;mental judo&amp;#34; against consumerism and modern control &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48104075&quot; title=&quot;Watch it if you haven&amp;#39;t already.  I accidentally landed in the middle of it while doing some illicit late night channel surfing when I was a kid.. this left quite an impression. I think it was a healthy formative influence for me and primed me for rejecting fads / peer pressure, distrusting authority, etc.  Probably also helped me to resist the more unhealthy aspects of a religious time/place, and I was even doing light reading on Cartesian skepticism a few years later, which got me into math. …&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48106299&quot; title=&quot;I wish I could upvote this 10 times! I love the film - blew my mind when I saw it on cable just after it came out.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://matklad.github.io/2026/05/12/software-architecture.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Learning Software Architecture&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (matklad.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48106024&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;607 points · 120 comments · by surprisetalk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that software architecture is best learned through hands-on experience and by understanding how social incentives and organizational structures, rather than just technical principles, dictate code quality and design choices. &lt;a href=&quot;https://matklad.github.io/2026/05/12/software-architecture.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Learning Software Architecture    URL Source: https://matklad.github.io/2026/05/12/software-architecture.html    Published Time: Wed, 13 May 2026 01:06:57 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Learning Software Architecture  [matklad](https://matklad.github.io/)[About](https://matklad.github.io/about.html)[Links](https://matklad.github.io/links.html)[Blogroll](https://matklad.github.io/blogroll.html)  # Learning Software Architecture    May 12, 2026  In reply to an email asking about learning software design…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Effective software architecture is characterized by minimizing surprise, decoupling data transformation from usage, and ensuring every piece of information has a single source of truth &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48107653&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ll give you the cheat sheet: - Good design is a single idea pervaded throughout. - More generally, your goal should be to minimize surprise. - If your system allows it, people will do it. - Everyone will not just.  If your solution starts with &amp;#39;if everyone will just...&amp;#39; then you don&amp;#39;t have a solution. - Isolate the parts of your system that transform data from the ones that use it.  Data models outlive code. - Coupling is the root of most evil. - Versioning is inevitable. - Make state…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some practitioners emphasize the importance of modular monoliths and planning for inevitable data migrations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48108373&quot; title=&quot;Good list! One addition? * start with a modular monolith&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48107737&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d add - data migrations are inevitable and should be planned for (corollary of versioning) - planning is good, sometimes you just have to try things out - everything costs money. Designing without costs in mind will force hard choices down the line&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that true mastery comes from the &amp;#34;dirty work&amp;#34; of maintaining legacy systems or rewriting projects multiple times to understand counterfactuals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48106881&quot; title=&quot;Software design/architecture is a strange beast. It feels that if you want to learn it, you should spend time in legacy systems and large codebases of rewrite a project 3 times to explore counterfactuals. A lot of books on the subjects are abstract and give such simple examples, they are useless.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. A point of contention exists regarding communication; while one expert views it as a &amp;#34;tax&amp;#34; to be justified, others maintain that constant communication is vital for success &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48107653&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ll give you the cheat sheet: - Good design is a single idea pervaded throughout. - More generally, your goal should be to minimize surprise. - If your system allows it, people will do it. - Everyone will not just.  If your solution starts with &amp;#39;if everyone will just...&amp;#39; then you don&amp;#39;t have a solution. - Isolate the parts of your system that transform data from the ones that use it.  Data models outlive code. - Coupling is the root of most evil. - Versioning is inevitable. - Make state…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48107939&quot; title=&quot;Can you explain the last one? What types of communications are you suggesting an arch would avoid? Otherwise, a very wise list!&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48108190&quot; title=&quot;Completely agree. Had me until the very last point. WTF. Communicate.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c202pgxx89lo&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;US inflation jumps to 3.8% as energy costs surge from Iran war&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48108313&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;260 points · &lt;strong&gt;439 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by tartoran&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;US inflation rose to 3.8% in April, its highest level since May 2023, as surging energy and food costs driven by the war in Iran impacted consumers and reduced the likelihood of interest rate cuts. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c202pgxx89lo&quot; title=&quot;US inflation jumps to 3.8% as energy costs surge from Iran war    The key measure of US inflation rises its highest level since May 2023 as consumers feel the impact of the Iran war.    [Skip to content](#bbc-main)    [British Broadcasting Corporation](/)    * [Home](/)  * [News](/news)  * [Sport](/sport)  * [Business](/business)  * [Technology](/technology)  * [Health](/health)  * [Culture](/culture)  * [Arts](/arts)  * [Travel](/travel)  * [Earth](/future-planet)  * [Audio](/audio)  * [Video](/video)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The surge in inflation to 3.8% has sparked a debate over the decline of American military and diplomatic influence, with some commenters arguing the war has exposed the U.S. as a &amp;#34;paper tiger&amp;#34; unable to protect allies or maintain its defense industrial base &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48108835&quot; title=&quot;I can&amp;#39;t think of a single way in which the United States came out ahead in the war. We have * Demonstrated that the US simply can&amp;#39;t offer any meaningful security guarantee to it&amp;#39;s middle east partners. * Permanently ceded de facto control over the straits of Hormuz to Iran * Significantly strengthened the hardliners in the Iranian regime and cleared the way for them to have absolute power by eliminating all moderates * Spiked inflation at home and doubled down on pissing off pretty much every…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48109018&quot; title=&quot;Your top point is honestly the biggest. Until this year, US military bases were seen as an asset. They were thought to deter attacks, and in the case of someone being crazy enough to attack the country that hosted a US military base, they sold the promise of a quick and decisive response. But for countries in the Middle East, every base was nothing but a liability with nothing but a long list of detriments. The bases got attacked and destroyed with basically zero effort whatsoever, local…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest the U.S. can leverage its political capital to outlast Iran’s economic vulnerabilities, others argue this ignores a &amp;#34;rally around the flag&amp;#34; effect in Iran that has unified the population against foreign intervention &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48109251&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I can&amp;#39;t think of a single way in which the United States came out ahead in the war. I wouldn&amp;#39;t jump to conclusions yet. The war is not over. I wouldn&amp;#39;t even be so sure as to say Iran is in a good place right now. Iran can absorb more pain than the US, but even that has a deadline. For the US, the only pain is inflation, which is more a matter of political capital than anything tangible. Trump is a lame duck president so I think he&amp;#39;s more than happy to spend his political capital on this. It&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48109644&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Iran can absorb more pain than the US, but even that has a deadline. It doesn&amp;#39;t. This is the western mentality, thinking you are dealing with sane people. I&amp;#39;m from Iran (now living in the West), there&amp;#39;s a famous Shia motto: &amp;#39;Every day is Ashura, every land is Karbala&amp;#39;. Around 30% of the population are die hard IRGC supporters, another 10% are neutral and the rest don&amp;#39;t like the regime. The problem is that, the war has caused a major rally around the flag effect. The IRGC has more support than…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Domestically, users report that the &amp;#34;real&amp;#34; cost of living for essentials like milk feels significantly higher than official figures, noting that wage growth is failing to keep pace with rising energy and food costs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48108581&quot; title=&quot;The tidbid they&amp;#39;re not talking about are the fact that wages are down .5% https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/12/cpi-inflation-april-2026-.ht...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48108766&quot; title=&quot;I understand it is a complicated calculation but to me personally, inflation feels much more than that. I have been tracking the price of milk. Around 3 months ago, i was getting a gallon of milk at $2.97, then it went up to 3.07, then 3.25. Yesterday I paid 3.40. That&amp;#39;s like 15% gain on something as basic as milk. All numbers from the same store.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48108777&quot; title=&quot;Those are real wages. We would expect to see that during a sudden jump in inflation. Wages tend to lag inflation. The other interesting part in that article is that excluding fuel and food still shows 2.8% inflation - only 1% attributable to food and fuel. Makes it seem like the main article and this article have different spins. Edit: Wow people are jumping on this. The point is that food and fuel increases account for about 26% of the overall inflation number, meaning that the bulk of…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://obsidian.md/blog/future-of-plugins/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Future of Obsidian Plugins&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (obsidian.md)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48109970&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;449 points · 177 comments · by xz18r&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Obsidian has launched a new Community site and developer dashboard featuring automated security reviews, safety scorecards, and enhanced discovery tools for its ecosystem of over 4,000 plugins and themes. &lt;a href=&quot;https://obsidian.md/blog/future-of-plugins/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The future of Obsidian plugins    URL Source: https://obsidian.md/blog/future-of-plugins/    Published Time: Wed, 13 May 2026 02:17:22 GMT    Markdown Content:  # The future of Obsidian plugins - Obsidian    [](https://obsidian.md/)    *   [Download](https://obsidian.md/download)  *   [Pricing](https://obsidian.md/pricing)  *   [Sync](https://obsidian.md/sync)  *   [Publish](https://obsidian.md/publish)  *   [Enterprise](https://obsidian.md/enterprise)    *       *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Obsidian’s new automated plugin review system aims to resolve a massive manual backlog that was causing developer burnout and scaling bottlenecks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48111426&quot; title=&quot;Obsidian CEO here. We&amp;#39;ve been working for nearly a year to launch this new Community site and review system. I&amp;#39;m very excited about this first version but there are many more improvements to come. I&amp;#39;ve tried to be exhaustive with the blog post, FAQs, and next steps on our roadmap, but I am sure I forgot some things, so feel free to ask! This has been an incredibly challenging project for a number of reasons. We&amp;#39;re only seven people but we have thousands of plugin developers and millions of…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48110898&quot; title=&quot;For those not aware, it has basically been impossible to submit new plugins due to the manual review (and how easy/fun it is to write a plugin with AI). The developer community was becoming increasingly frustrated, and the team was burning out under the load. So congrats to the team! This relieves a huge scaling bottleneck. It has been really cool to see how y&amp;#39;all build and scale.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While the CEO confirmed that a formal permissions system and sandboxing are on the roadmap, some users remain skeptical that automated scans can reliably detect malicious behavior given that plugins currently run with broad filesystem and network access &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48110384&quot; title=&quot;I’m not convinced that automated checks will be able to reliably assess whether a plugin is malicious. I think the best (only?) way to solve the plugin security problem would be to properly sandbox them with an explicit API and permission system.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48111298&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;I think the best (only?) way to solve the plugin security problem would be to properly sandbox them with an explicit API and permission system. I want to say &amp;#39;and especially prevent them from touching my private data (i.e. the whole point of Obsidian plugins being to read/write the documents)&amp;#39;. But if it can&amp;#39;t talk to the internet, I kind of don&amp;#39;t see the issue. EDIT: Apparently due to how JS and Electron works, Obsidian plugins are just JS blobs that run in the global scope, and can…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48110592&quot; title=&quot;Read through the blog post. A permissions system is planned in addition to the automated scans and more controls for teams. All are necessary because permissions alone can&amp;#39;t solve certain malicious behaviors. Look at some scorecards on the Community site you&amp;#39;ll quickly see why some of the warnings are not things a permissions system or sandboxing could catch. The blog post contains details about the rollout, but it will be a phased approach because it requires changes to the plugin API.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. This security debate is further complicated by long-standing disagreements over Obsidian&amp;#39;s closed-source nature, with some users demanding full transparency while others prioritize the &amp;#34;trusted source&amp;#34; model and lack of data lock-in &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48111447&quot; title=&quot;I want to use Obsidian... but I won&amp;#39;t as long as it&amp;#39;s not open source. I know I can keep all my files as plain text, but that&amp;#39;s not enough for me. Using a KB on a daily basis shapes my workflows and having to change that from one day to another (e.g., because maybe Obsidian changes in a way I don&amp;#39;t like) is too much for me. I could already handle all my plain txt files using simply the file system, but of course I would prefer a KB program. It&amp;#39;s a shame because Obsidian looks great.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48111495&quot; title=&quot;Trusted source &amp;gt; open-source As long as it&amp;#39;s trusted, there is no lock-in, and the model supports maintaining the software, what do you have to lose?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48114325&quot; title=&quot;In what universe is it trusted? This blog post is an admission that they&amp;#39;ve been lying to their userbase about their review process for years, with updates receiving no review whatsoever. Enjoy your mass exfiltration.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2026q2/018471.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;CERT is releasing six CVEs for serious security vulnerabilities in dnsmasq&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lists.thekelleys.org.uk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48112042&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;376 points · 241 comments · by chizhik-pyzhik&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CERT has released six CVEs for long-standing security vulnerabilities in dnsmasq, prompting the release of a patched stable version (2.92rel2) and an upcoming 2.93 update to address bugs identified through AI-based security research. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2026q2/018471.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Security - IMPORTANT    URL Source: https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2026q2/018471.html    Published Time: Tue, 12 May 2026 01:55:43 GMT    Markdown Content:  # [Dnsmasq-discuss] Security - IMPORTANT    # [Dnsmasq-discuss] Security - IMPORTANT    **Simon Kelley**[simon at thekelleys.org.uk](https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2026q2/018471.html)    _Mon May 11 17:18:25 UTC 2026_  *   Previous message (by thread): [[Dnsmasq-discuss] Issue…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of six CVEs for dnsmasq sparked a debate over Debian&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;stable&amp;#34; release model, with critics arguing that backporting patches to ancient versions is a resource-intensive, error-prone practice that defers necessary maintenance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113027&quot; title=&quot;Maybe this is the kick in the ass Debian needs to upgrade the embarrassingly ancient dnsmasq in &amp;#39;stable&amp;#39; because while I can&amp;#39;t think of any new features, the latest versions contain many non-CVE bug fixes. But I doubt it, they will lazily backport these patches to create some frankenstein one-off version and be done with it. Before anyone says &amp;#39;tHaT&amp;#39;s wHaT sTaBlE iS fOr&amp;#39;: they have literally shipped straight-up broken packages before, because fixing it would somehow make it not &amp;#39;stable&amp;#39;. They…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113508&quot; title=&quot;No, that&amp;#39;s exactly the thing to complain about. That whole model dates to before automated testing was even really a thing, and no one knew how to do QA; your QA was all the people willing to run your code and report bugs, and that took time. Not to mention, you think the C of today is bad? Have you looked at old C? And the disadvantage is that backporting is manual, resource intensive, and prone to error - and the projects that are the most heavily invested in that model are also the projects…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113878&quot; title=&quot;You&amp;#39;re going to have to update production at some point, and delaying it to once every 2 years is just deferred maintenance. And you know what they say about that... So when you do update and get that GSSAPI change, it comes with two years worth of other updates - and tracking that down mixed in with everything else is going to be all kinds of fun. And if you&amp;#39;re two years out of the loop and it turns out upstream broke something fundamental, and you&amp;#39;re just now finding out about it while…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents defend the model, asserting that it prevents production breakage from upstream changes and that refactors belong in testing environments rather than immediate security updates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113263&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;re not going to put a newer version in stable. The way stable gets newer versions of things is that you get the newer version into testing and then every two years testing becomes stable and stable becomes oldstable, at which point the newer version from testing becomes the version in stable. The thing to complain about is if the version in testing is ancient.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113771&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; That whole model dates to before automated testing was even really a thing, and no one knew how to do QA; your QA was all the people willing to run your code and report bugs, and that took time. That&amp;#39;s not what it&amp;#39;s about. What it&amp;#39;s about is, newer versions change things. A newer version of OpenSSH disables GSSAPI by default when an older version had it enabled. You don&amp;#39;t want that as an automatic update because it will break in production for anyone who is actually using it. So instead the…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48114168&quot; title=&quot;There are two different kinds of updates. One is security updates and bug fixes. These need to fix the problem with the smallest change to minimize the amount of possible breakage, because the code is already vulnerable/broken in production and needs to be updated right now . These are the updates stable gets. The other is changes and additions. They&amp;#39;re both more likely to break things and less important to move into production the same day they become public. You don&amp;#39;t have to wait until…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Meanwhile, the author of MaraDNS promoted their project as a secure alternative following AI-assisted audits, though others questioned if its lower bug count was simply due to less popularity compared to the &amp;#34;proven&amp;#34; dnsmasq &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113443&quot; title=&quot;Shameless plug time: My own MaraDNS has been extensively audited now that we’re in the age of AI-assisted security audits. Not one single serious security bug has been found since 2023. [1] The only bugs auditers have been finding are things like “Deadwood, when fully recursive, will take longer than usual to release resources when getting this unusual packet” [2] or “This side utility included with MaraDNS, which hasn’t been able to be compiled since 2022, has a buffer overflow, but only if…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48114299&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s a bit shameless, indeed. dnsmasq has served me well for like an eternity in multiple setups for different use cases. As all software it has bugs. And once located those get fixed. Its author is also easy to communicate with. Why should I switch over to something way less proven? I&amp;#39;m quite sure your software also has bugs, many still not located. Maybe because it&amp;#39;s less popular/ less well known nobody cares to hunt for those bugs? Which means even if the numbers of found bugs is less in…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48115033&quot; title=&quot;Well, as you bundle Lua 5.1 (as Lunacy), instead of making a library and loading it, and you bundled the 2012 version, you&amp;#39;re probably affected by CVE-2014-5461 and others. Lua hasn&amp;#39;t been security fix free.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://typesetinthefuture.com/2016/02/18/futuristic/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How to make your text look futuristic (2016)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (typesetinthefuture.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113895&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;495 points · 60 comments · by _vaporwave_&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dave Addey outlines six typography rules for creating futuristic text, such as using italic slants, removing horizontal segments, and adding metallic textures, as seen in iconic science fiction movie logos like *Blade Runner*, *Star Trek*, and *Back to the Future*. &lt;a href=&quot;https://typesetinthefuture.com/2016/02/18/futuristic/&quot; title=&quot;Title: How To Make Your Text Look Futuristic    URL Source: https://typesetinthefuture.com/2016/02/18/futuristic/    Published Time: 2016-02-19T07:04:41+00:00    Markdown Content:  # How To Make Your Text Look Futuristic | Typeset In The Future    [Skip to content](https://typesetinthefuture.com/2016/02/18/futuristic/#content)    # [Typeset In The Future](https://typesetinthefuture.com/)    ## Typography and Design in Science Fiction Movies    Primary Menu    *   [Home](https://typesetinthefuture.com/)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Readers praised the article as a fun and engaging look at sci-fi typography, though some noted that the example font, Eurostile, is already a well-established genre staple &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48115380&quot; title=&quot;I kind of wish they had used something other than Eurostyle for the starting font in their example since it is already a font that has become associated with sci-fi. Still a great article though! More of this please!&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48114376&quot; title=&quot;A genuinely fun post.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion highlighted the author’s book on the subject, which fans recommend as an excellent coffee table resource that expands on the history and inspiration of modern futuristic typesets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48114231&quot; title=&quot;Needs a (2016) &amp;gt; Posted on February 18, 2016 by Dave Addey Great read otherwise, I know the author mentions their book, I do wonder if he covers the history of how these fonts came to be so standard... for future stuff&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48114383&quot; title=&quot;As someone who has read the book, it does go through the history and inspiration of modern sci-fi typeset. Great coffee table book. Mainly expands on the articles on the website with more details and graphics.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48114540&quot; title=&quot;Might have to snag it, and like you say, keep it laying around as a coffee table book somewhere. :)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters also enjoyed the article&amp;#39;s humor, specifically referencing the fictional &amp;#34;Kern Wars of 2067&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48116968&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; the devastating Kern Wars of 2067 Do we know who won those wars?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48115339&quot; title=&quot;They can&amp;#39;t keep getting away with it!&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.savethearchive.com/newsleaders/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tell NYT, Atlantic, USA Today to keep Wayback Machine&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (savethearchive.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48115807&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;435 points · 119 comments · by doener&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fight for the Future has launched a petition urging major media outlets, including The New York Times, The Atlantic, and USA Today, to stop blocking the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine from preserving their journalism. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.savethearchive.com/newsleaders/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Tell New York Times, The Atlantic, and USA Today to keep the crucial work of journalists in the Wayback Machine!    URL Source: https://www.savethearchive.com/newsleaders/    Markdown Content:  # Tell New York Times, The Atlantic, and USA Today to keep the crucial work of journalists in the Wayback Machine!    [Are you a journalist? Join Rachel Maddow and sign the journalist letter here.](https://www.savethearchive.com/journalists/)    ![Image 1: A project by Fight for the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on major news outlets blocking the Wayback Machine via robots.txt, a move largely attributed to their desire to prevent AI companies from scraping content and to protect paywall revenue &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48116640&quot; title=&quot;Am I correct that this has come about because archive.org respects robots.txt and these sites have blocked their crawler from indexing their sites? I&amp;#39;m not sure how to articulate my thoughts on this exactly, other than to say it&amp;#39;s disappointing that doing the right thing (i.e. respecting robots.txt) is rewarded with the burden of soliciting responses to a petition while at the same time others are rewarded with profit for ignoring those same directives.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48116834&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s because they want to restrict AI companies from stealing content, but they can&amp;#39;t do it if internet archive proxies it all for them. All of the LLMs would be massively less useful if it wasn&amp;#39;t for scraping the latest news.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users admit to primarily using the archive to bypass paywalls &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48117125&quot; title=&quot;I signed, but let’s be honest. A pie chart showing the times I used the wayback machine to read an old NYT article vs the times I visited it due to a highly upvoted top HN comment linking to a relatively new article so we all can bypass the paywall is a solid circle.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that LLM companies have the resources to circumvent these blocks regardless &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48116894&quot; title=&quot;LLMs have other ways of accessing the content, they don’t need the Web Archive. Every LLM company can afford to spin up a new subscriber account every day, proxying to appear different IPs from all sorts of ASNs, do some crawling until the account gets banned, and then do it again, and again, and again.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a notable call for negotiation, with suggestions that publications could allow archiving after a 30-day delay to balance historical preservation with current monetization &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48116558&quot; title=&quot;I know a little about this debate on the Times and Atlantic sides. I’ll get some grief for this, but I asked a senior person at the former what they thought about the paywall workarounds that are frequent on HN —I was genuinely shocked to learn they hadn’t heard about it. In the end, we settled on agreeing that making such stuff available after 30 days, and possibly with access restrictions (can’t be pulled more than N times a day, in case it becomes relevant in the future) struck the right…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.insidehighered.com/news/tech-innovation/administrative-tech/2026/05/11/instructure-pays-ransom-canvas-hackers&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Instructure pays ransom to Canvas hackers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (insidehighered.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48103668&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;272 points · 248 comments · by Cider9986&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instructure has paid a ransom to hackers following a cyberattack on its Canvas learning management system to prevent the release of stolen data. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.insidehighered.com/news/tech-innovation/administrative-tech/2026/05/11/instructure-pays-ransom-canvas-hackers&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.instructure.com&amp;amp;#x2F;incident_update#:~:text=STATUS%20UPDATE%205&amp;amp;#x2F;11&amp;amp;#x2F;26&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.instructure.com&amp;amp;#x2F;incident_update#:~:text=STATUS%2...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.nytimes.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;05&amp;amp;#x2F;12&amp;amp;#x2F;us&amp;amp;#x2F;canvas-instructure-hackers-deal.html&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.nytimes.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;05&amp;amp;#x2F;12&amp;amp;#x2F;us&amp;amp;#x2F;canvas-instructure-hac...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The decision to pay a ransom presents a classic collective action problem: while individual victims are incentivized to pay to prevent data leaks, doing so sustains a criminal industry that targets future victims &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48111305&quot; title=&quot;on one hand, every ransom paid encourages like-minded individuals to start or ramp up their ransomware game , which is not great. on the other hand, the ransomware groups that want to stay in business need to be honest (with respect to not releasing/deleting data) or they wont be &amp;#39;credible&amp;#39; ransomware operators, which is kind of funny to think about. and in many cases, the victims would rather the ransomware operator be paid (so their data is not leaked) vs. having their data leaked. so paying…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48111530&quot; title=&quot;This is always the game theory of ransoms, and it is a classic example of a collective action problem (and is a form of a prisoner&amp;#39;s dilemma). Each individual company is probably better off paying the ransom, but everyone would be better off if no one paid a ransom. This is why the United States, for example, has an official no-ransom policy, and why other no-ransom policies exist. You have to have something forcing the individual victim to not pay, otherwise they will always be incentivized to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Some argue that making such payments illegal—similar to policies regarding kidnappings or sanctioned entities—is the only way to remove the monetary incentive for hackers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48112271&quot; title=&quot;Years ago I attended a conference that had a &amp;#39;fireside chat&amp;#39; with a DoJ official on the topic of these types of ransom payments. He framed the issue as being similar to kidnapping ransoms: When an American is taken hostage each family is inclined to make payment but it fosters an industry around kidnapping Americans. Congress put a stop to it by making it illegal to pay the kidnappers. The industry shifted by ceasing the non-profitable American kidnapping and instead began targeting Europeans.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48111267&quot; title=&quot;I thought it was illegal to pay ransom to hackers. I guess it is legal or maybe it isn&amp;#39;t very clear? I thought that there were certain conditions that the company had to check together with law enforcement so that at least the ransom money doesn&amp;#39;t go to a hacker group that is on a government payments sanctions list. Also, does anyone know the root cause of the attack? I read a rumor online (but it&amp;#39;s not really confirmed anywhere) that it may have had to do with the common pattern of…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48112721&quot; title=&quot;This is the way to go. Instead of paying ransom, and creating a ransomware criminal industry out of thin air, its better to force companies to recover and restore from backups and remove monetary incentive for crime. and the executives who failed to carry regular backups obviously should face the music&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, the current landscape is often managed by third-party insurers, and the &amp;#34;credibility&amp;#34; of ransomware groups depends on them actually deleting data once paid, though internal rogue actors may still leak it for extra profit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48111305&quot; title=&quot;on one hand, every ransom paid encourages like-minded individuals to start or ramp up their ransomware game , which is not great. on the other hand, the ransomware groups that want to stay in business need to be honest (with respect to not releasing/deleting data) or they wont be &amp;#39;credible&amp;#39; ransomware operators, which is kind of funny to think about. and in many cases, the victims would rather the ransomware operator be paid (so their data is not leaked) vs. having their data leaked. so paying…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48111881&quot; title=&quot;There’s a similar dynamic from within the hacker group itself. For the ransom group, it is better for them to be perceived as trustworthy. Pay the ransom and we won’t leak your data. For any individual within the ransom group, they can get a big payout by selling the data.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48111452&quot; title=&quot;Not only is it not illegal, there are insurance policies set up to take care of this very scenario. It&amp;#39;s almost always handled by a third party, not the company themselves, that would deal with any such concerns.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/05/canadas-bill-c-22-repackaged-version-last-years-surveillance-nightmare&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Canada’s Bill C-22 Is a Repackaged Version of Last Year’s Surveillance Nightmare&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (eff.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48111531&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;379 points · 134 comments · by Brajeshwar&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Canada’s proposed Bill C-22, the Lawful Access Act, would require digital services to retain user metadata for one year and grant the government power to mandate law enforcement backdoors, raising significant privacy and security concerns among tech companies and civil liberties advocates. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/05/canadas-bill-c-22-repackaged-version-last-years-surveillance-nightmare&quot; title=&quot;Title: Canada’s Bill C-22 Is a Repackaged Version of Last Year’s Surveillance Nightmare    URL Source: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/05/canadas-bill-c-22-repackaged-version-last-years-surveillance-nightmare    Published Time: 2026-05-11T13:18:14-07:00    Markdown Content:  # Canada’s Bill C-22 Is a Repackaged Version of Last Year’s Surveillance Nightmare | Electronic Frontier Foundation  [Skip to main…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Critics argue that Bill C-22’s mandatory data retention and encryption backdoors will force major messaging services like Signal and WhatsApp to exit the Canadian market &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48112965&quot; title=&quot;Both the mandatory data retention and encryption backdoor requirements will cause encrypted messaging services like Signal, WhatsApp, iMessage, Matrix, and others to block both Canadians and Canadian businesses from their services. If you live in Canada or are impacted by this legislation, then you need to tell both your MP and the Minister of Public Safety of Canada to reject this legislation. --- The Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) published information about Bill C-22 here just…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest these &amp;#34;totalitarian&amp;#34; shifts may spark innovation in censorship-circumvention tools, others note that such policies are often permanent fixtures that are simply rebranded over time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113969&quot; title=&quot;I know this will be an unpopular comment but I actually somewhat like it when governments show their totalitarian side.  It&amp;#39;s both a wake-up call for some in denial and also drives my favorite type of innovation.  That is, anything that subverts censorship.  It won&amp;#39;t be a lot of people but there will be splinter groups that break away from the big centralized platforms.  It&amp;#39;s not usually a big deal but it&amp;#39;s also not nothing and that&amp;#39;s maybe good enough for me. In the past this occurred in the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48114300&quot; title=&quot;But, is it possible to undo any of the policies put into place? Seems like once the machinery gets implemented, everyone in government embraces it (my assumption being due to all the spending/enrichment of friends/family gov contractors).&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48114690&quot; title=&quot;I honestly don&amp;#39;t know how things will (d)evolve from here.   Official back-doors a.k.a. lawful intercept to encryption is an interesting twist, not a new proposal by any means but in the past this always ended up being hush-hush with small trusted inner circles of people at tech and telephony companies as they could never get such laws passed. If this passes I suspect it will be much harder to monitor terrorist activities as terrorists will just move to self hosted or non technical solutions. …&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The legislation is viewed by some as a reaction to Canadian Supreme Court rulings that limited data collection, influenced by similar legislative trends in the UK and Australia &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48112104&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a confluence of two things: (i) Canada&amp;#39;s government policy community tends to be heavily influenced by legislative trends in the UK/Aus/NZ; this particular one is almost a direct import from the UK&amp;#39;s ill-advised Online Safety Act, though worse in some ways, and (ii) a series of Canadian Supreme Court decisions, most notably 2024&amp;#39;s Bykovets, which the security intelligence apparatus in Canada feels has totally hamstrung data collection. Both (i) and (ii) have led the government to this dark…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.epicfurious.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Operation: Epic Furious&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (epicfurious.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48109519&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;381 points · 126 comments · by dmschulman&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The provided link leads to a landing page for &amp;#34;Epic Furious&amp;#34; that currently contains no news content, featuring only a logo, a privacy policy, and a link to a site called &amp;#34;The Secret Handshake.&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.epicfurious.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Epic Furious    URL Source: https://www.epicfurious.com/    Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.    Markdown Content:  # EPIC FURIOUS  ![Image 1: EPIC FURIOUS](https://www.epicfurious.com/epicfuriouslogo.png)[![Image 2: The Secret Handshake](https://www.epicfurious.com/The_Secret_Handshake.png)](https://www.thesecrethandshake.com/)[Privacy Policy](https://www.epicfurious.com/privacy)     This site uses analytics cookies.  OK&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the motivations behind the conflict, with debate over whether the primary driver is oil interests or geopolitical support for Israel &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48110822&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s great except the war is obviously for Israel not oil, we had more access to oil before the war&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48111706&quot; title=&quot;Well oil is frequently trotted out as a reason to do this, so we certainly can&amp;#39;t take oil out of the discussion, whether it feels like it&amp;#39;s an obvious bad reason or not. It&amp;#39;s been all throughout the news throughout March and April, here&amp;#39;s some examples (please excuse the LLM summary, but summarizing lots of repetitive news links is actually one thing that LLMs do not hallucinate on often): &amp;gt; March 29-30, 2026: Trump told the Financial Times that his &amp;#39;preference would be to take the oil&amp;#39; and…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Users also noted the game&amp;#39;s nostalgic aesthetic, comparing it to classic Sierra titles like *King&amp;#39;s Quest* &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48110324&quot; title=&quot;Excellent. I remember King Quest, Larry Quest and the rest and it immediately gave me the same nostalgic vibes.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, while others observed satirical gameplay elements involving political figures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48110261&quot; title=&quot;I can&amp;#39;t believe we&amp;#39;re so beyond parody at this point. Also, instant game over from trying to hold Melania&amp;#39;s hand lol&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant portion of the thread focuses on meta-commentary regarding the post&amp;#39;s sudden removal from the front page and heated political disagreements between commenters &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48110998&quot; title=&quot;Is this post shadow-flagged or something? It’s off the front page.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48110692&quot; title=&quot;You’re a fan of the political party whose leader insults and mocks the pope. Literally insulting the person who is channeling the word of the Lord. Why do you support those that deeply insult Jesus?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48110927&quot; title=&quot;Why was this removed from the front page? It was number one just a couple minutes ago&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48110814&quot; title=&quot;Chill. GP never said he was against or in favor of the current US administration. This is quite a deranged strawman argument that borders on a personal attack. This behavior does not lead to clever or constructive conversation. There are much better ways to get your point across. It feels weird to have to write this but it seems warranted: A religious preference is something that extends beyond the limited time and space of a US political party.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://duckdb.org/2026/05/12/quack-remote-protocol&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Quack: The DuckDB Client-Server Protocol&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (duckdb.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48111765&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;383 points · 83 comments · by aduffy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DuckDB has introduced Quack, a new HTTP-based client-server protocol that enables multiple concurrent writers and remote database access. Designed for high performance, it outperforms PostgreSQL and Arrow Flight SQL in bulk transfers and small-write transactions while maintaining DuckDB&amp;#39;s simple, extensible architecture. &lt;a href=&quot;https://duckdb.org/2026/05/12/quack-remote-protocol&quot; title=&quot;Title: Quack: The DuckDB Client-Server Protocol    URL Source: https://duckdb.org/2026/05/12/quack-remote-protocol    Published Time: 2026-05-12T00:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  The DuckDB team    2026-05-12·20 min    _TL;DR: DuckDB instances can now talk to each other using the Quack remote protocol. This lets you run DuckDB in a client-server setup with multiple concurrent writers. In DuckDB&amp;#39;s spirit, Quack is simple to set up and builds on proven technologies such as HTTP. It&amp;#39;s also fast, which…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The introduction of Quack has sparked debate over DuckDB’s evolving identity, with some users questioning its long-term direction and the necessity of a client-server protocol over existing standards like Arrow Flight &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113396&quot; title=&quot;I like DuckDB but I&amp;#39;m not sure what it wants to be. There&amp;#39;s always new ways to use it and it&amp;#39;s not easy to see what&amp;#39;s the right one.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113495&quot; title=&quot;+1 I can&amp;#39;t think of many use cases for this and Arrow Flight, other than moving data around.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While critics argue that building on HTTP is &amp;#34;misguided&amp;#34; due to potential streaming and timeout issues compared to the PostgreSQL protocol &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113996&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It would be rather misguided not to build a database protocol on top of HTTP in 2026 This is wrong, HTTP is bad for transferring large amount of data and it is also bad for doing streaming. It is bad for large amount of data because you have timeout issues on some clients, you hit request/response size limits etc. It is obviously bad for streaming as there is no concept of streaming in it. It is comical to go the path of least resistance so lazy people can put a reverse proxy on top of it.…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others see it as a vital step for scaling lakehouse architectures and enabling multi-user concurrency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48114417&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Can I use DuckDB with Quack as the catalog database for DuckLake? &amp;gt; Not yet, but we are working on it! Seems like a niche use case, but it&amp;#39;s the one I&amp;#39;m most interested in. Our lakehouse uses ducklake with postgres as the catalog. Seems like a DuckDB / Quack catalog would be an excellent alternative.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48115246&quot; title=&quot;I have a C++ application. Everything is in memory during execution. Saved to disk between session as XML. Works great, except that that it is strictly single user and some of my customers would love me to generalize it for multiple concurrent users reading and writing. Performance requirements are quite low - a few thousand records being updated by 2 or 3 people at a time. Would DuckDb + Quack be a good choice for this? Or are there better choices? I looked at SQLite, but I understand it…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48114031&quot; title=&quot;uh, doing analytics type queries on large datasets that postgres would choke on, as an RPC? I&amp;#39;m using it (ducklake specifically) to build a lakehouse RPC server that can scale horizontally based on resource utilization in k8s.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite skepticism regarding the benchmark&amp;#39;s use of CSV comparisons, proponents highlight its potential for migrating workloads away from expensive providers like Snowflake toward more flexible, commodity engines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113996&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It would be rather misguided not to build a database protocol on top of HTTP in 2026 This is wrong, HTTP is bad for transferring large amount of data and it is also bad for doing streaming. It is bad for large amount of data because you have timeout issues on some clients, you hit request/response size limits etc. It is obviously bad for streaming as there is no concept of streaming in it. It is comical to go the path of least resistance so lazy people can put a reverse proxy on top of it.…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113757&quot; title=&quot;The use case is local user DuckDB talking to MotherDuck for $. This is not commercially a terrible idea. Why keep paying Snowflake for bog-standard SQL query workload when  SF makes it easy to migrate to Iceberg &amp;amp; commodity engines like MotherDuck?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-05-12/ebay-rejects-gamestop-s-56-billion-takeover-as-not-credible&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;eBay Rejects GameStop&amp;#39;s $56B Takeover as Not Credible&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bloomberg.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48110021&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;228 points · 225 comments · by voisin&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-05-12/ebay-rejects-gamestop-s-56-billion-takeover-as-not-credible&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely view GameStop’s bid as a &amp;#34;ridiculous clown show,&amp;#34; noting that the CEO&amp;#39;s inability to answer basic questions during interviews undermined the deal&amp;#39;s credibility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48110228&quot; title=&quot;Any reasonable person could see this was a ridiculous clown show, put on by the ridiculous clown show meme stock company.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48110347&quot; title=&quot;Well if you’ve seen the CNBC interview with the GameStop CEO he couldn’t answer basic questions about the deal so the outcome here isn’t surprising. The interview was so bad the first time I saw it I thought it was some sort of satire bit. No, it was real and the commentators were literally speechless.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that GameStop’s physical footprint could have provided a logical &amp;#34;in-store&amp;#34; receiving arm for eBay’s secondhand market &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48110289&quot; title=&quot;Gamestop turning into an eBay storefront makes a lot of sense to me and this seemed to be a very rational step to take when the short squeeze anomaly left them with billions in the bank and a business model that no longer makes very much sense with physical game sales being eaten by digital-only sales along with the potential decline of the console. They already have the position of used buying and sales, extending that into in store receiving and listing of items on eBay makes sense.  eBay…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48110722&quot; title=&quot;Seems like a no brainer for people who want to go into a physical store without dealing with the hassle of waiting for the item to sell along with packaging and shipping.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that GameStop is an unsustainable business surviving only on &amp;#34;short squeeze&amp;#34; anomalies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48110215&quot; title=&quot;I really thought it was going to be the other way around. I am quite confident that if GameStop bought eBay, they would ruin it in the same way that K-Mart buying Sears ruined that company. I could be wrong, I&amp;#39;m not a business person, but it seems kind of obvious that a company like GameStop, whose current existence appears to be due to a weird short squeeze anomaly, is not a sustainable business.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite Ryan Cohen’s track record as a successful entrepreneur &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48110515&quot; title=&quot;The context this comment misses is Gamestop&amp;#39;s secret weapon is their CEO Ryan Cohen who has been sitting around the hoop trying to figure out how to leverage Gamestop&amp;#39;s fundraising capabilities to do something big Couple of highlights on Ryan - Built and sold Chewy from a startup to the largest ecomm acq of all time    - Became #1 individual shareholder of Apple early on  - Bought a 10% share of Gamespot in 2020 becoming largest personal shareholder  - Took over as CEO after being a proactive…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, the consensus remains that the acquisition would have been a high-risk maneuver for two companies already struggling with the decline of traditional retail &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48110215&quot; title=&quot;I really thought it was going to be the other way around. I am quite confident that if GameStop bought eBay, they would ruin it in the same way that K-Mart buying Sears ruined that company. I could be wrong, I&amp;#39;m not a business person, but it seems kind of obvious that a company like GameStop, whose current existence appears to be due to a weird short squeeze anomaly, is not a sustainable business.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48110512&quot; title=&quot;The TD Bank securities commitment of 20B to finance the deal and GameStop having a market cap far below the acquisition cost suggests that buying eBay would’ve been very problematic and risky for investors. But comparing it to K mart buying sears isn’t really  accurate to me. Like yeah, GameStop clearly fits into the death of retail, and acquiring eBay does increase their market visibility or presence. Beyond that, what ebay/GS could’ve gained is way different and arguably more substantial than…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48110419&quot; title=&quot;I mean they make a good point -- ebay isn&amp;#39;t a serious company anymore.  It really needs someone with a vision to rebuild it.  That its limping along and executives are essentially bleeding a previously valuable internet asset dry is kind of sad.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-11</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-11</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://medium.com/@NMitchem/if-ai-writes-your-code-why-use-python-bf8c4ba1a055&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;If AI writes your code, why use Python?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (medium.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48100433&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;917 points · &lt;strong&gt;980 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by indigodaddy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As AI agents become proficient in complex systems languages like Rust and Go, the traditional trade-off between development speed and runtime performance is disappearing, allowing developers to ship highly efficient, low-level code without the steep manual learning curve previously required. &lt;a href=&quot;https://medium.com/@NMitchem/if-ai-writes-your-code-why-use-python-bf8c4ba1a055&quot; title=&quot;Title: If AI Writes Your Code, Why Use Python?    URL Source: https://medium.com/@NMitchem/if-ai-writes-your-code-why-use-python-bf8c4ba1a055    Published Time: 2026-04-28T12:31:02Z    Markdown Content:  Press enter or click to view image in full size    ![Image 1](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:700/1*xhqxJyee2OyVxUmQF35RBw.png)    The modern python stack.    ### **For the last decade, fast-to-ship beat fast-to-run. Not anymore.**    Picking a language for a new project was usually an easy answer. You…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary argument for continuing to use Python with AI is the massive volume of training data available, which ensures high-quality outputs and easy readability for human review &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48102688&quot; title=&quot;Read the first few comments and surprised I didn’t see it, but training data. The voluminous amount of Python in the training data. I could write in brainfuck with ai, but I presume, wouldn’t get the same results than if going with python. My follow up question: with AI now, why care about a lang until you need to?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48100842&quot; title=&quot;AI&amp;#39;s are really good with Python. Quick turnaround. Easy to read. Tons of training data/examples. Many of the same reasons we wrote Python before. Another benefit to using Python, is if you subscribe to writing/vibing a throwaway version first, a Python version is 100x better than a spec. (Disclaimer: I teach Python and AI for a living and am doing a tutorial at pycon this week, Beyond vibe coding. Am also using other languages as there are times when Python isn&amp;#39;t appropriate)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some users argue that Python&amp;#39;s lack of type safety leads to frequent runtime errors in AI-generated code, suggesting that typed languages like Go or TypeScript provide better &amp;#34;guard rails&amp;#34; for LLMs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48103127&quot; title=&quot;Just use Go. LLMs have seen a ton of it, they write it well, it compiles practically instantly, and it has all the advantages of a typed compiled language. I created a big Python codebase using AI, and the LLM constantly guesses arguments or dictionary formats wrong. Unit tests and stuff like pydantic help, but it&amp;#39;s better to avoid that whole class of runtime errors altogether.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48100823&quot; title=&quot;The ideal language for AI coding: 1. Type safety as basic guard rails that LLM output is syntactically and schematically correct 2. Concise since you have to review a lot more code 3. Easy to debug / good observability since you can&amp;#39;t rely on your understanding of the code. Something functional where you can observe the state at any moment would be ideal. 4. A very large set of public code examples across various domains so there&amp;#39;s enough training data for the LLM to be proficient in that…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some believe LLMs excel at Python due to its popularity, others point out that AI can be surprisingly proficient in less common languages through translation, though &amp;#34;enterprise&amp;#34; languages often suffer from excessive boilerplate that can exhaust context windows &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48102769&quot; title=&quot;Training data can&amp;#39;t be the whole answer. LLMs are really good at translating to different programming languages. This makes sense, given that they are derived from text translation systems. I&amp;#39;m getting great results in languages with comparatively small bodies of freely available code. The bigger hurdle is usually that LLMs tend to copy common idioms in the target language and if it is an &amp;#39;enterprise-y&amp;#39; language like Java or C#, the amount of useless boilerplate can skyrocket immediately, which…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.k10s.dev/im-going-back-to-writing-code-by-hand/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I&amp;#39;m going back to writing code by hand&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.k10s.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48090029&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1024 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 615 comments · by dropbox_miner&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After seven months of &amp;#34;vibe-coding&amp;#34; a Kubernetes TUI with AI, the author is rewriting the project from scratch to fix architectural decay, &amp;#34;god objects,&amp;#34; and data races caused by prioritizing rapid feature delivery over sound structural design and human oversight. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.k10s.dev/im-going-back-to-writing-code-by-hand/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Im going back to writing code by hand    URL Source: https://blog.k10s.dev/im-going-back-to-writing-code-by-hand/    Published Time: Tue, 12 May 2026 02:16:34 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Im going back to writing code by hand | k10s devlog  # [k10s devlog](https://blog.k10s.dev/)  [Home](https://k10s.dev/)[Posts](https://blog.k10s.dev/blog/)[Github](https://github.com/shvbsle/k10s)[Discord](https://discord.gg/rngaJustFD)    # Im going back to writing code by hand    _09 May, 2026_    This dev-log is…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the long-term viability of AI-generated code, with many experienced developers warning that agents lack the judgment to know when architectural invariants must be changed rather than blindly followed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48093197&quot; title=&quot;Yep. The only people I&amp;#39;ve heard saying that generated code is fine are those who don&amp;#39;t read it. The problem is that the mitigations offered in the article also don&amp;#39;t work for long. When designing a system or a component we have ideas that form invariants. Sometimes the invariant is big, like a certain grand architecture, and sometimes it’s small, like the selection of a data structure. You can tell the agent what the constraints are with something like &amp;#39;Views do NOT access other views&amp;#39; state&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48094374&quot; title=&quot;That doesn&amp;#39;t quite work, and precisely for the reason I mentioned: You can definitely tell the AI to follow some strategy, but at some point the strategy will need to change, and the AI won&amp;#39;t tell you that (even if you tell it to). Unless you read the code every time you won&amp;#39;t know if the AI is following the strategy and producing good results or following it and producing bad results because the strategy has to change. This can happen even in small changes: the AI will follow the strategy even…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that strict modularization and &amp;#34;micro-managing&amp;#34; the AI can produce high-quality results &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48094183&quot; title=&quot;If you know how to write good code you can force AI to write good code with various techniques. It&amp;#39;s 100% doable. You just need to figure out the problems AI has and find solutions to make it easier for it. Ex: extremely small contexts   Modularize to modules with clear boundaries and only allow the AI to work within those boundaries. Make modules pure from IO so they are easily testable. Hide modules behind interfaces etc .. You can write 100 tests that executes within a second. You can write…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48094312&quot; title=&quot;So, basically you need to micro-manage it. Where are your 10x gains now? And is it fun to work like that?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others report that relying on agents often leads to &amp;#34;cognitive debt&amp;#34; and massive code bloat that eventually requires manual deletion &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48091332&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve set a few rules for working with coding agents: 1. If I use a coding agent to generate code, it should be something I am absolutely confident I can code correctly myself given the time (gun to my head test). 2. If it isn&amp;#39;t, I can&amp;#39;t move on until I completely understand what it is that has been generated, such that I would be able to recreate it myself. 3. I can create debt (I believe this is being called Cognitive Debt) by breaking rule 2, but it must be paid in full for me to declare a…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48092782&quot; title=&quot;That’s the same story I had. The swindle goes like this, AI on a good codebase can build a lot of features, you think it’s faster it even seems safer and more accurate on times, especially in domains you don’t know everything about. This goes in for a while whilst the codebase gets bigger and exploration takes longer and failure rate increases. You don’t want it to be true and try harder so you only stop after it practically became impossible to make any changes. You look at the code again and…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a sharp divide between those who believe we are approaching a &amp;#34;compiler-like&amp;#34; trust in LLMs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48094952&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m no longer sure you have to, actually. I mean, we do trust the assembly that compilers produce without having to read it, don&amp;#39;t we? We&amp;#39;re rapidly getting to that stage with LLMs, IMO.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt; and those who insist that because agents excel at hiding &amp;#34;time bombs,&amp;#34; users must review generated code even more rigorously than human-written code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48094681&quot; title=&quot;The &amp;#39;people&amp;#39; in your hypothetical story have been wrong the whole time. The correct attitude is: When AI can complete lines, you still have to read and understand the code. When AI can complete whole functions, you still have to read and understand the code. When AI can complete features and tickets, you still have to read and understand the code.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48094374&quot; title=&quot;That doesn&amp;#39;t quite work, and precisely for the reason I mentioned: You can definitely tell the AI to follow some strategy, but at some point the strategy will need to change, and the AI won&amp;#39;t tell you that (even if you tell it to). Unless you read the code every time you won&amp;#39;t know if the AI is following the strategy and producing good results or following it and producing bad results because the strategy has to change. This can happen even in small changes: the AI will follow the strategy even…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tanstack.com/blog/npm-supply-chain-compromise-postmortem&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Postmortem: TanStack NPM supply-chain compromise&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tanstack.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48100706&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1094 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 464 comments · by varunsharma07&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TanStack has released a postmortem detailing a recent npm supply-chain compromise where a maintainer&amp;#39;s account was hijacked to publish malicious versions of several packages, which have since been removed and replaced with secure updates. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tanstack.com/blog/npm-supply-chain-compromise-postmortem&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;github.com&amp;amp;#x2F;TanStack&amp;amp;#x2F;router&amp;amp;#x2F;issues&amp;amp;#x2F;7383&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;github.com&amp;amp;#x2F;TanStack&amp;amp;#x2F;router&amp;amp;#x2F;issues&amp;amp;#x2F;7383&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The TanStack supply-chain compromise featured a sophisticated &amp;#34;dead-man&amp;#39;s switch&amp;#34; that attempts to delete the user&amp;#39;s home directory if the stolen GitHub token is revoked &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48101454&quot; title=&quot;Please be careful when revoking tokens. It looks like the payload installs a dead-man&amp;#39;s switch at ~/.local/bin/gh-token-monitor.sh as a systemd user service (Linux) / LaunchAgent com.user.gh-token-monitor(macOS). It polls api.github.com/user with the stolen token every 60s, and if the token is revoked (HTTP 40x), it runs rm -rf ~/. https://github.com/TanStack/router/issues/7383#issuecomment-...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this highlights systemic flaws in the NPM ecosystem, others contend that all modern package managers are equally vulnerable unless they adopt a Linux-distro-style manual review process &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48101074&quot; title=&quot;My decision to abandon the JS ecosystem and language entirely continues to pay off. What a mess... I am, however, concerned that this will pwn my workplace. We don&amp;#39;t use Tanstack but this seems self-propagating and I doubt all of our dependencies are doing enough to prevent it.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48101162&quot; title=&quot;Abandon NPM in exchange for what? Cargo? Go get? Pip install? Every package manager that does not analyze and run tests on the packages being uploaded (like Linux distros do) is vulnerable.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant debate regarding mitigation: suggestions range from using isolated VMs for every project to implementing &amp;#34;staged publishing&amp;#34; where a human must provide a second factor outside of CI/CD to authorize a release &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48101308&quot; title=&quot;It is unfortunate, but this is evidence (IMO) that Trusted Publishing is still ~~not secure~~ not enough by itself to securely publish from CI, as an attacker inside your CI pipeline or with stolen repo admin creds can easily publish. This isnt new information, TP is not meant to guarantee against this, but migrating to TP away from local publish w/ 2fa introduces this class of attack via compomise of CI. (edit: changed &amp;#39;still not secure&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;still not enough by itself&amp;#39; bc that is the point I…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48101677&quot; title=&quot;I think we are at the point where everyone really needs to run each project in its own vm. Given the recent lpe vulns docker 100% won’t cut it. And containers were never meant primarily as a security boundary anyways&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, NPM&amp;#39;s restrictive unpublish policy was criticized for delaying the removal of malicious tarballs, forcing maintainers to wait hours for manual intervention &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48103258&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Unpublish was unavailable for nearly all affected packages because of npm&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;no unpublish if dependents exist&amp;#39; policy. We have to rely on npm security to pull tarballs server-side, which adds hours of delay during which malicious tarballs remain installable Per https://docs.npmjs.com/policies/unpublish : &amp;gt; If your package does not meet the unpublish policy criteria, we recommend deprecating the package. This allows the package to be downloaded but publishes a clear warning message (that you…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://about.gitlab.com/blog/gitlab-act-2/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GitLab announces workforce reduction and end of their CREDIT values&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (about.gitlab.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48100500&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;701 points · 679 comments · by AnonGitLabEmpl&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GitLab is initiating a transparent restructuring that includes reducing its workforce, flattening management layers, and shrinking its geographic footprint by 30%. The company is also retiring its &amp;#34;CREDIT&amp;#34; values in favor of new operating principles focused on AI-driven &amp;#34;agentic&amp;#34; software engineering and machine-scale infrastructure. &lt;a href=&quot;https://about.gitlab.com/blog/gitlab-act-2/&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitLab Act 2    URL Source: https://about.gitlab.com/blog/gitlab-act-2/    Published Time: 2026-05-11    Markdown Content:  We&amp;#39;ve been working through some significant changes inside GitLab over the past few days, and I want to share them with you directly. The email I sent the team is included below for full context.    The agentic era affords GitLab the largest opportunity in our history as a company, and we&amp;#39;re making the structural and strategic decisions to meet it.    This letter has three…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GitLab’s shift from &amp;#34;CREDIT&amp;#34; values to an AI-focused &amp;#34;agentic era&amp;#34; is widely criticized as a buzzword-heavy attempt to placate investors while abandoning principles like transparency and DEI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48101155&quot; title=&quot;Their old CREDIT values:  Collaboration,  Results for Customers,  Efficiency,  Diversity, Inclusion &amp;amp; Belonging,  Iteration, and  Transparency. New values: Speed with Quality, Ownership Mindset, Customer Outcomes. In other words, work harder, not smarter, and no more DEI.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48101100&quot; title=&quot;A lot of the conclusions they&amp;#39;re drawing in this post about the &amp;#39;agentic era&amp;#39; seem quite misguided and some don&amp;#39;t really seem to make sense. I have no doubt GitLab has too many employees and can benefit from being a more focused company, but it&amp;#39;s tiring reading these layoff posts so chock full of buzzwords. I guess they&amp;#39;re desperately hoping if they prognosticate about AI enough it will placate the investors.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters are divided on the utility of DEI, with some viewing it as a core industry strength and others dismissing it as a distraction from productivity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48101711&quot; title=&quot;There seems to be a massive push against DEI over the last few years in the tech industry globally, despite it being one of the industry&amp;#39;s greatest strength. Does anyone know what caused this?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48101781&quot; title=&quot;I think you need to make a case for DEI being “one of the industry’s greatest strengths”. It’s not obvious to me.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48101286&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m firmly not in Trump&amp;#39;s anti-DEI camp but I have seen what can happen when you make it one of your core values. You can end up with a lot of people talking about it a lot, lots of meetings and initiatives rather than doing actual work. And usually those don&amp;#39;t go anywhere because the people doing it don&amp;#39;t have any power to actually change things. It&amp;#39;s unlikely that a company like Gitlab really needs anything changing anyway. It doesn&amp;#39;t make sense for it to be 40% of their values, especially if…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, users expressed frustration that GitLab is prioritizing risky AI integration over stability, missing a prime opportunity to capture market share from a struggling GitHub &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48101595&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s a &amp;#39;github down&amp;#39; post here every other day. The ball is right there, bouncing alone in front of the goal, and they just have to position themselves as &amp;#39;we&amp;#39;re the stable ones&amp;#39; to score that market when the exodus inevitably happens. Nope, full throttle and stimulants, just because.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48101381&quot; title=&quot;Wow gitlab.  Right when everyone was looking to see if you could lead with all the fails at github, you basically said &amp;#39;We&amp;#39;re going to throw our source at ChatGPT and see what happens&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.seangoedecke.com/software-engineering-may-no-longer-be-a-lifetime-career/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Software engineering may no longer be a lifetime career&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (seangoedecke.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48095550&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;491 points · &lt;strong&gt;762 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by movis&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of AI in software engineering may shorten career lifespans by prioritizing short-term productivity over long-term skill development, potentially turning the profession into a high-intensity, time-limited role similar to professional athletics or physical labor. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.seangoedecke.com/software-engineering-may-no-longer-be-a-lifetime-career/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Software engineering may no longer be a lifetime career    URL Source: https://www.seangoedecke.com/software-engineering-may-no-longer-be-a-lifetime-career/    Markdown Content:  I don’t think there’s compelling evidence that using AI makes you less intelligent overall[1](https://www.seangoedecke.com/software-engineering-may-no-longer-be-a-lifetime-career/#fn-1). However, it seems pretty obvious that using AI to perform a task means you don’t learn as much _about performing that task_. Some…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate centers on whether software engineering is shifting from manual &amp;#34;oil rig&amp;#34; labor to high-level solution architecture, with some arguing that coding itself occupies only a fraction of a professional&amp;#39;s time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48096558&quot; title=&quot;Multiple times per week I have the same conversation.  It goes something like this: - AI will make developers irrelevant    - Why?    - Because LLMs can write code    - Do you know what I do for a living?    - Yes, write code?    - Yes, about 2-5% of the time.  Less now.    - But you said you are a developer?    - I did    - So what do you do 95-98% of the time?    - I understand things and then apply my ability to formulate solutions    - But I can do that!    - So why aren&amp;#39;t you? The developers who…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48097907&quot; title=&quot;This is a bit of glib answer.  Most of the time is spent coding which encompasses typing, retyping, and retyping again.  It also includes banging your head against the wall while trying to get one of your rewrites to work against and under-documented API. OP&amp;#39;s formulation makes SWE sound like a purely noble enterprise like mathematics.  It&amp;#39;s more like an oil rig worker banging on pieces of metal with large hammers to get the drill string put together.  They went in with a plan, but the reality…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some believe AI empowers senior engineers by handling &amp;#34;raw calculation&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;moments of despair,&amp;#34; others warn that this increased efficiency may eliminate junior roles and leave displaced workers with few viable alternatives for retraining &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48096867&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Yes, about 2-5% of the time. There are also those for whom that percentage is higher, let’s say 6-50%. &amp;gt; I understand things and then apply my ability to formulate solutions The AI is coming for that too. You might just be lucky to be in circumstances that value your contributions or an industry or domain that isn’t well represented in the training data, or problem spaces too complex for AI. Not everyone is, not even the majority of devs. People knocking out Jira tickets and writing CRUD…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48096113&quot; title=&quot;I keep reading about how AI will be fine because people can just retrain for different careers. However, I never read what those careers are or who is going to pay for retraining. I certainly don&amp;#39;t have the money or time to go back to college and start a new career at the bottom.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48098278&quot; title=&quot;In my experience, it&amp;#39;s been the complete opposite. The very experienced engineers that are actually willing to use top of the line tooling are much better than they were before, including those that are over 40, and over 50. Part of the practical degradation of traditional programmers over time has always been concentration and deep calculation, just like in chess. The old chess player knows chess much better than a 19 year old phenom, but they cannot calculate for that many hours at the same…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48098418&quot; title=&quot;But when a senior can do the job of 6 coworkers, what do you suppose will happen to the coworkers? In farming, those who were replaced by tractors did not keep their jobs. What is different now?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48099732&quot; title=&quot;These days nobody bangs their heads over typos. LLMs evaporated 90% of the &amp;#39;moments of despair&amp;#39; when you have an error and googling it isn&amp;#39;t helping, or googling it made you realize you have to read 30min of documentation. Coding is a joy now. LLMs shaved off all the rough edges.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. A critical point of contention remains whether AI can truly master complex problem-solving or if its lack of determinism ensures that those who can still manually program will maintain a competitive &amp;#34;moat&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48096867&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Yes, about 2-5% of the time. There are also those for whom that percentage is higher, let’s say 6-50%. &amp;gt; I understand things and then apply my ability to formulate solutions The AI is coming for that too. You might just be lucky to be in circumstances that value your contributions or an industry or domain that isn’t well represented in the training data, or problem spaces too complex for AI. Not everyone is, not even the majority of devs. People knocking out Jira tickets and writing CRUD…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48096317&quot; title=&quot;I really wish seemingly intelligent people would stop using the abstraction analogy (like the article does). The key word is: determinism. Every level of abstraction (inc. power tools, C, etc.) added a deterministic layer you can rely on to more effectively do whatever it is that you&amp;#39;re doing - same result, every time. LLM&amp;#39;s use natural language to describe programming and the result is varied at the very best (hence agents, so we can brute force the result instead). I think the real moat is…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/google-account-registration-now-requires-sending-an-sms-via-phone-instead-of-receiving-an-sms/36082&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Gmail registration now requires scanning a QR code and sending a text message&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (discuss.privacyguides.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48092028&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;634 points · 515 comments · by negura&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google has reportedly updated its account registration process to require users to scan a QR code and send an SMS from their phone, a move intended to improve security and prevent phishing but which complicates anonymous sign-ups and the use of third-party verification services. &lt;a href=&quot;https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/google-account-registration-now-requires-sending-an-sms-via-phone-instead-of-receiving-an-sms/36082&quot; title=&quot;Title: Google account registration now requires sending an SMS via phone instead of receiving an SMS - General - Privacy Guides Community    URL Source: https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/google-account-registration-now-requires-sending-an-sms-via-phone-instead-of-receiving-an-sms/36082    Published Time: 2026-03-08T14:20:09+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Google account registration now requires sending an SMS via phone instead of receiving an SMS - General - Privacy Guides Community    [Skip to last…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users argue Google was &amp;#34;roped into&amp;#34; maintaining Gmail as a free public utility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48097912&quot; title=&quot;People complain a lot about Gmail, but honestly I kind of understand Google&amp;#39;s plight here. They&amp;#39;ve essentially gotten roped into maintaining a huge chunk of internet infrastructure, for free . If they ever shut it down the whole world would end up rioting because it&amp;#39;s so widely used. But it&amp;#39;s expensive, complicated and time-consuming to maintain - and both a source of and recipient of endless waves of spam and scams. It&amp;#39;s an endless pile of data to hold onto, FOREVER, as well. I enjoy hating on…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that Google intentionally used predatory pricing and massive storage to drive out competition and secure a data-mining monopoly &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48098490&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; They&amp;#39;ve essentially gotten roped into maintaining a huge chunk of internet infrastructure, for free. I’ll stop you here. Google offered it for free and, at the time, offered such an high amount of mail storage for free it sounded insane. At the time, my ISP gave me a 25MB or 50MB inbox and that was considered pretty decent, when Google was trying to get people in with 1-2GB. They absolutely have a right to take ant steps they deem necessary to prevent malicious use of their product, and…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48099373&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; and certainly aren’t obligated to provide it for free And I&amp;#39;ll stop you here. It&amp;#39;s less than obvious that there&amp;#39;s no obligation. If you provide a critical service that folks rely on at a price less than your cost, you drive out competition, and it&amp;#39;s a critical part of your own business model, dropping the service without warning is IMO on the border of what Google should be allowed to do.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48099417&quot; title=&quot;Yeah! I can&amp;#39;t believe people know basics about cartels, trusts and dumping.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant skepticism regarding the original claim of a mandatory QR code, with users clarifying it is likely an optional SMS URI for convenience or a specific flow triggered by suspicious programmatic registration attempts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48094155&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Supposedly, using the QR code on the smartphone triggers an SMS sent from your phone to Google in order to verify your phone number. Does anyone have a better source of information than this one forum comment from someone who thinks scanning a QR code is enough to get your phone to send a text message? EDIT: It’s just an SMS URI. It doesn’t automatically send anything, just opens a text message for you to send. This is just the old phone number verification with a QR code convenience method.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48095300&quot; title=&quot;I went through it to register just now. No QR code required. Same flow as it has been for years: 1. Personal/Child/Business 2. First/Last 3. Pick email 4. Date of Birth 5. Backup email / Skip 6. Password 7. Enter phone number 8. Confirm with 2FA code 9. Done. I just made the email testregistrationflow@gmail.com and have since forgotten the password. So that’s one burned. But feel free to try testregistrationflow1@gmail.com and see if it works without a QR code. The headline is clearly a…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Amidst these technical hurdles, commenters report a decline in Gmail&amp;#39;s quality, noting its failure to filter sophisticated phishing attempts and the risk of permanent account lockouts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48093829&quot; title=&quot;Any Gmail person can tell me why Gmail is tolerating Gmail phishing emails that use Google&amp;#39;s own services (e.g. https://storage.googleapis.com/savelinge/ ... ? More info here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46665414&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48094140&quot; title=&quot;Spam is getting horrible lately. I get all sorts of new techniques including: - using legitimate sites to bypass filters, like sending you a bill through a legitimate bill-creation site - pretending to be a tracking service for something you supposedly ordered, then over the course of days pretending the package got lost on the way and offering a discount code for the &amp;#39;purchased&amp;#39; amount, expecting you to use it on their phising site. Gmail not only fails at spam classification, they classify…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48093728&quot; title=&quot;Recently helped a small business set up a Google Workspace account and we hit a wall during registration. Told the owners that if Google is already being difficult during signup, imagine being locked out later with client work on the line. Pulled up a few horror stories about Google lockouts to drive the point home. They ended up with another workspace solution.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2026/05/11/mythos-finds-a-curl-vulnerability/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mythos Finds a Curl Vulnerability&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (daniel.haxx.se)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48091737&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;702 points · 282 comments · by TangerineDream&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic&amp;#39;s new AI model, Mythos, identified one low-severity vulnerability and approximately twenty bugs in the curl codebase, though lead developer Daniel Stenberg noted the results suggest the model&amp;#39;s advanced capabilities may be overhyped compared to existing AI security tools. &lt;a href=&quot;https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2026/05/11/mythos-finds-a-curl-vulnerability/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Mythos finds a curl vulnerability    URL Source: https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2026/05/11/mythos-finds-a-curl-vulnerability/    Published Time: 2026-05-11T08:01:35+02:00    Markdown Content:  # Mythos finds a curl vulnerability | daniel.haxx.se  [Skip to content](https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2026/05/11/mythos-finds-a-curl-vulnerability/#content)    [![Image 1:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on whether Anthropic’s &amp;#34;Mythos&amp;#34; model represents a genuine breakthrough or a successful marketing stunt designed to create a &amp;#34;security scare&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48092073&quot; title=&quot;Quote: &amp;#39;My personal conclusion can however not end up with anything else than that the big hype around this model so far was primarily marketing. I see no evidence that this setup finds issues to any particular higher or more advanced degree than the other tools have done before Mythos. Maybe this model is a little bit better, but even if it is, it is not better to a degree that seems to make a significant dent in code analyzing.&amp;#39; It&amp;#39;s a good reminder for us all that the competition in this…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48092860&quot; title=&quot;Anthropic using marketing to convince people their models are more advanced, better built, or that AI is a threat that needs to be regulated because only they have the answer? I’m shocked. More seriously, so far I haven’t seen much indication that Mythos is more than Opus with a security focused code analysis harness. That said, the fact it can find these bugs in an automated fashion is the more important takeaway outside of the hype. I’m curious what the error rate is on the detections,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48092548&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; An amazingly successful marketing stunt for sure. This. Well done by Antropic. It even reached the CISO of my small semi-government org in the Netherlands, who slightly panicked at the announced &amp;#39;tsunami&amp;#39; of vulnerabilities that was coming with Mythos. Got us some more money and priority with the board, though. Never waste a good marketing scare.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that the model&amp;#39;s ability to find vulnerabilities in hardened codebases like Firefox is a significant and &amp;#34;worrying&amp;#34; advancement that lowers the floor for exploit creation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48095565&quot; title=&quot;Is Mozilla marketing on Anthropic&amp;#39;s behalf? As part of our continued collaboration with Anthropic, we had the opportunity to apply an early version of Claude Mythos Preview to Firefox. This week’s release of Firefox 150 includes fixes for 271 vulnerabilities identified during this initial evaluation.            As these capabilities reach the hands of more defenders, many other teams are now experiencing the same vertigo we did when the findings first came into focus. For a hardened target, just…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48094717&quot; title=&quot;I commented this in another post but I&amp;#39;m going to repeat it because I believe its important for this discussion. &amp;gt; The worrying part about Mythos isn&amp;#39;t the fact that it can find bugs. The worrying part is Mythos being able to find them on its own across entire code base as vast as Firefox then write exploits for what its found with a very basic prompt. &amp;gt; The skill required to find then create zero days is quickly approaching the floor.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that existing models like Opus already possessed these capabilities and that the hype is largely exaggerated &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48092860&quot; title=&quot;Anthropic using marketing to convince people their models are more advanced, better built, or that AI is a threat that needs to be regulated because only they have the answer? I’m shocked. More seriously, so far I haven’t seen much indication that Mythos is more than Opus with a security focused code analysis harness. That said, the fact it can find these bugs in an automated fashion is the more important takeaway outside of the hype. I’m curious what the error rate is on the detections,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48094778&quot; title=&quot;Opus can find bugs on its own in large codebases just fine with minimal prompting. The great exaggeration is that this is a new capability.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48094837&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Opus can find bugs on its own in large codebases just fine with minimal prompting. and then it write the exploits automatically for you?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics also point out that *curl* is an outlier due to its extreme maturity, suggesting the model&amp;#39;s true impact may be more visible in less audited projects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48093073&quot; title=&quot;Curl simply isn&amp;#39;t a good data point. It&amp;#39;s one of the most picked-over codebases in existence with extensive security testing practices. All the researchers using not-quite-Mythos models have had plenty of time to report bugs up to this point. Daniel may be right that Mythos hasn&amp;#39;t been a game changer for curl but the preconditions are different for virtually any other codebase. Perhaps the real marketing here is his own modesty about curl&amp;#39;s maturity.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48093964&quot; title=&quot;This is roughly what I was assuming but of course the big caveat here is that they were already using the existing LLM driven tooling on an extensively audited codebase. So while anthropic&amp;#39;s marketing may be hype there just wasn&amp;#39;t much left to find, a point he makes in the blog post. Whether it&amp;#39;s a big step forward for other kinds of projects is difficult to tell, but this highlights that everybody should be using AI code review tools to audit their existing code today, and not everybody is.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ratty-term.org/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ratty – A terminal emulator with inline 3D graphics&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ratty-term.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48093100&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;675 points · 244 comments · by orhunp_&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ratty is a GPU-rendered terminal emulator that supports inline 3D graphics and high-performance rendering. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ratty-term.org/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Ratty — A GPU-rendered terminal emulator with inline 3D graphics 🐀🧀    URL Source: https://ratty-term.org/    Published Time: Mon, 11 May 2026 09:47:10 GMT    Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.    Markdown Content:  # Ratty — A GPU-rendered terminal emulator with inline 3D graphics 🐀🧀    ![Image 1](https://ratty-term.org/assets/images/ratty-logo.gif)    ‹    Ratty    ![Image 2](https://ratty-term.org/assets/images/ratty-logo.gif)    ›    [Read the blog…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ratty is viewed as part of a broader evolution of the terminal toward the rich, graphical REPL experiences found in data science notebooks or historical Lisp machines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48094022&quot; title=&quot;I like this. No reason the terminal should only support text. Data science notebooks show one way the terminal can evolve. Lots of interesting stuff happening in this space, with Kitty probably being the most aggressive innovator here [1]. I&amp;#39;m not sure there is an overall vision, though. [1]: https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/protocol-extensions/&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48093856&quot; title=&quot;UNIX still trying to catch up with Xerox workstations in the REPL experience, or general Lisp machines for that matter. Inline graphics from 1981, https://youtu.be/o4-YnLpLgtk?t=376&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users question the continued need for the terminal abstraction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48095962&quot; title=&quot;The question is - why do we still need the terminal abstraction at all?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others see practical utility in 3D previews for file browsing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48094092&quot; title=&quot;I wonder if something like this could work for thumbnails in the terminal; I prefer to browse my filesystem from a terminal rather than the point and click file manager typically, and it would be really useful if I could have a grid-style `ls` with terminal based renders of the 3d models (thinking STL/STEP, 3D printing) in that directory. Bonus points if I could preview/rotate the model to inspect it.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt; or as a step toward immersive VR/XR development environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48099275&quot; title=&quot;A couple of comments here mention using this in VR. Fwiw, years back I played a bit with shallow-3D UIs for software dev. Shallow like within a few cm of a laptop display, to minimize VAC eye strain for all-day use. Think more being able to layer and draw in color, but in 3D, rather than waving arms in a room. The 3D can be wiggle 3D, or perspective from webcam head/eye tracking, or stereo from shutter glasses, or XR HMDs. Wiggle is easiest - just move the object orientation back and forth.…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48100164&quot; title=&quot;I have a working fully 3D glyph based text rendering system I can&amp;#39;t seem to get people to look at. It&amp;#39;s this. Every character is a 3d placed quad, instanced rendered, so you get tens of millions and then some. They are individually addressable and mutable like any polygon. I use it to render entire GitHub repos in one go.  I have two versions, native Apple and web. Web has the basics of an ide setup. Would love insight or thoughts. https://ivanlugo.dev/ide&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The project&amp;#39;s explicit inspiration from TempleOS was a notable point of discussion, highlighting a trend of modern tools adopting features once considered niche or &amp;#34;nonsense&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48093442&quot; title=&quot;I was going to comment how it reminded me of TempleOS and the author should look into that, but the accompanying blog post explains how it was inspired by it https://blog.orhun.dev/introducing-ratty/&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48093473&quot; title=&quot;I actually see some use cases for this. It&amp;#39;s one of those should be nonsense projects that somehow isn&amp;#39;t.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://martin.sh/i-let-ai-build-a-tool-to-help-me-figure-out-what-was-waking-me-up-at-night/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I let AI build a tool to help me figure out what was waking me up at night&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (martin.sh)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48100662&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;276 points · 285 comments · by showmypost&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A software engineer used AI coding tools to build a custom sleep-monitoring system that syncs audio recordings with Garmin watch data and home sensors. The tool identifies specific noises—like slamming doors or traffic—causing sleep disruptions, allowing for targeted home improvements like acoustic paneling and better insulation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://martin.sh/i-let-ai-build-a-tool-to-help-me-figure-out-what-was-waking-me-up-at-night/&quot; title=&quot;Title: I Let AI Build a Tool to Help Me Figure Out What Was Waking Me Up at Night    URL Source: https://martin.sh/i-let-ai-build-a-tool-to-help-me-figure-out-what-was-waking-me-up-at-night/    Published Time: 2026-05-11T20:56:57.000Z    Markdown Content:  9 min read May 11, 2026    I try to pay attention to the small things that affect my quality of life. When something keeps bothering me, I want to investigate, find a likely cause, and act on it.    What changed recently is _what I&amp;#39;m willing to build_…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether earplugs are an effective solution for sleep disturbances, with some users citing scientific benefits for reducing awakenings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48101529&quot; title=&quot;Hey, OP, consider sleeping with ear plugs. They&amp;#39;re scientifically proven to reduce night time awakenings due to audio disturbances. [1] [1] https://academic.oup.com/sleep/advance-article/doi/10.1093/s...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; while others warn of potential inflammation, earwax buildup, and safety concerns regarding intruders &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48104316&quot; title=&quot;AFAIK there is some inflammation potential if earplugs are used all night everyday. https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/advice-wearing-ea...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48101748&quot; title=&quot;I would think earwax build up would increase with that&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48103983&quot; title=&quot;Maybe I&amp;#39;ve seen too many horror movies, but aren&amp;#39;t you concerned about not hearing an intruder and being able to respond? Maybe I&amp;#39;m paranoid. :)&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. One user suggests that excessive earwax can be mitigated by dietary and environmental changes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48103201&quot; title=&quot;I used to have lots of earwax buildup that kept me from using earplugs. Then I fixed my health.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48103836&quot; title=&quot;Leave the environments that stimulated it. Stop eating the foods that stimulate it. I now have visible production on a tissue or cotton swab once a week or fewer.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, while another points out that high CO2 levels in the author&amp;#39;s data might be a more significant factor affecting sleep quality than noise &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48101157&quot; title=&quot;That CO2 concentration looks unhealthy, I wonder to what extent it&amp;#39;s affecting your sleep quality (as opposed to waking you up). &amp;gt; Measure before you fix In my case, I got a few IKEA CO2 sensors, and after leaving them in the bedrooms for a few days, we found that leaving an outside window slightly open + the bedroom door open, kept the CO2 levels below 600PPM at night. We&amp;#39;re 1000ft/300m away from a motorway, but fortunately the noise pollution isn&amp;#39;t bad. So ventilating (even as it&amp;#39;s getting…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. A humorous sidebar debates the hypothetical risk of &amp;#34;cat burglars&amp;#34; taking advantage of earplug users to steal pets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48103317&quot; title=&quot;Don&amp;#39;t listen to him– he is a cat burglar, and you being deaf at night helps him steal your cats.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48103752&quot; title=&quot;Is there such a flourishing black market for subtracted cats that would prompt burglars to steal these pets?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.openculture.com/2024/10/the-greatest-shot-in-television.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The greatest shot in television: James Burke had one chance to nail this scene (2024)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (openculture.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48090521&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;363 points · 192 comments · by susam&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Science historian James Burke’s perfectly timed 1978 rocket launch scene from the series *Connections* remains celebrated as one of television&amp;#39;s greatest shots for its technical precision and intellectual delivery during a high-stakes, single-take sequence. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.openculture.com/2024/10/the-greatest-shot-in-television.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Greatest Shot in Television: Science Historian James Burke Had One Chance to Nail This Scene … and Nailed It    URL Source: https://www.openculture.com/2024/10/the-greatest-shot-in-television.html    Published Time: 2024-10-04T08:00:20+00:00    Markdown Content:  # The Greatest Shot in Television: Science Historian James Burke Had One Chance to Nail This Scene ... and Nailed It | Open Culture  # The Greatest Shot in Television: Science Historian James Burke Had One Chance to Nail This Scene…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the clip from James Burke’s *Connections* is widely celebrated, commenters point out that it is technically not a single &amp;#34;shot&amp;#34; due to a visible cut just before the rocket launch &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48093332&quot; title=&quot;This is my pet peeve. I don&amp;#39;t know the show, but when I first watched this clip (under the title of &amp;#39;greatest shot on television&amp;#39;) I totally bought in to the hype and thought it really was amazing. You start out just walking alongside him, and only slowly realize where you are and what is about to happen, and everything is perfectly timed and composed: he ends his walk, reaches the conclusion of his explanation, and you realize what is going on, all at the exact time the launch begins.…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48090952&quot; title=&quot;I always love this video, and I have been a lifetime dedicated fan of James Burke, but few seem to note that the whole segment didn&amp;#39;t have to be timed as there is a cut shortly before the launch.  If I recall either James or one of the producers talked about it once.  They knew they had to start the last bit 13 seconds before launch and had practiced it repeatedly.  At 13 seconds to countdown James nailed it.  I&amp;#39;m sure even after practicing it I would have stumbled over a word in the clutch…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite this edit, viewers admire the precision required to time the final 13-second segment perfectly with a live liftoff &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48090952&quot; title=&quot;I always love this video, and I have been a lifetime dedicated fan of James Burke, but few seem to note that the whole segment didn&amp;#39;t have to be timed as there is a cut shortly before the launch.  If I recall either James or one of the producers talked about it once.  They knew they had to start the last bit 13 seconds before launch and had practiced it repeatedly.  At 13 seconds to countdown James nailed it.  I&amp;#39;m sure even after practicing it I would have stumbled over a word in the clutch…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, though some note the audio was likely edited to remove the natural acoustic delay of the rumble &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48093768&quot; title=&quot;The press location is surely double-digit seconds sonically from the launch site. So the simultaneous launch rumble is also an edit.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights a decline in documentary quality since the 1970s &amp;#34;golden age&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48090743&quot; title=&quot;The late 1970&amp;#39;s were the golden age of documentaries: Connections, Cosmos, Civilization, The Ascent of Man and Attenborough&amp;#39;s Life on Earth. Perhaps it&amp;#39;s just me, but modern documentaries are rather dumbed down? As a side note: Quite ironic that he ends up pointing to a rocket propelled mostly by solid fuels.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, while others find hope in modern educational YouTube creators despite the frustrations of poorly formatted 16:9 aspect ratio stretches on old 4:3 footage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48091388&quot; title=&quot;It really grinds my gears that the uploader had to ruin the &amp;#39;Greatest Shot in Television&amp;#39; by stretching the 4:3 video to 16:9. I know I sound like a pedant but so many of these old TV recordings are uploaded this way on youtube. I was so annoyed by this infact that a few years ago I made a dumb extension that squeezes the video element back to 4:3 [1]. I&amp;#39;m not sure if this still works though. [1] https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/doddimnledmldclhlbf...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48090978&quot; title=&quot;Yes, but the YouTube ed channels are such a treasure in and of itself. We had the “tech” to produce content like this for almost a century, but it took the Internet and democratization of content creation to come up with gems like smarter every day, veritasium, extra history, etc My fear is that this is also being reshaped with ai, mostly for good now but I feel like the personal touch and passion of these creators is being diluted with the advent of generated content. Maybe we are in a valley…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48091614&quot; title=&quot;A question about aspect ratio on youtube, Does it care? or can you put whatever aspect ratio you want, I guess my complaint is that I don&amp;#39;t see nearly enough (none) square video on the site.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stemcell.ucla.edu/news/ucla-discovers-first-stroke-rehabilitation-drug-repair-brain-damage&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;UCLA discovers first stroke rehabilitation drug to repair brain damage (2025)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (stemcell.ucla.edu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48098261&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;446 points · 102 comments · by bookofjoe&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;UCLA researchers have discovered a drug called DDL-920 that repairs brain damage and restores movement control in mice by mimicking the effects of physical rehabilitation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stemcell.ucla.edu/news/ucla-discovers-first-stroke-rehabilitation-drug-repair-brain-damage&quot; title=&quot;Title: UCLA discovers first stroke rehabilitation drug to repair brain damage    URL Source: https://stemcell.ucla.edu/news/ucla-discovers-first-stroke-rehabilitation-drug-repair-brain-damage    Published Time: Tue, 12 May 2026 05:22:58 GMT    Markdown Content:  # UCLA discovers first stroke rehabilitation drug to repair brain damage  [Skip to main content](https://stemcell.ucla.edu/news/ucla-discovers-first-stroke-rehabilitation-drug-repair-brain-damage#main-content)    HOW UCLA STEM CELL RESEARCH IS…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the UCLA study offers hope for repairing neural disconnections after a stroke, commenters clarify that it targets surviving networks rather than reviving dead cells at the center of an infarct &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48102368&quot; title=&quot;My understanding was that strokes caused brain cell death, and that there was no coming back from that, but my neurologists would speak of &amp;#39;bruised&amp;#39; brain cells, and that after weeks or months or even years you can see recovered function. UCLA&amp;#39;s work here is targeting this disconnection and the lost rhythm in the surviving, distant networks. However there is, as yet, NO concievable intervention that could recover function from cell death at that center of the infarct.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48102787&quot; title=&quot;One wonders if someday we might be able to resurrect the neural network from dead cells by somehow reviving the connections between neurons. I imagine that the connections stay, but become dormant when the neuron dies.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Skepticism remains high regarding the study&amp;#39;s reliance on male mice, with critics noting that only 5% of animal-tested drugs reach the market and suggesting the &amp;#34;breakthrough&amp;#34; headline may be university PR designed to boost visibility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48101140&quot; title=&quot;But it&amp;#39;s not progress. Not really. Mice are used only partly because they share a considerable amount of DNA with us. But they&amp;#39;re mostly used because they&amp;#39;re cheap. Both in financial and ethical costs. They live for about two years, and breed in about three months. They are disposable. Over 100 million are killed each year in various labs across the country. And for all of this, only about 5% of medicine that show positive animal results make it to market in some fashion. So basically, the best…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48100568&quot; title=&quot;... in male mice. I think savvy universities want PIs who are savvy enough to realize that the point of these is to boost measurable visibility like citation count and h-index, so the headline of a news release boosting the article doesn&amp;#39;t matter. They can always blame a copy editor for the headlines. It could read &amp;#39;world peace solved with moon juice.&amp;#39; The provost would only care if it generated negative feedback. So it&amp;#39;s the PR department&amp;#39;s job to juice it as much as possible without getting…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also touched on lifestyle factors, with some arguing that basic health habits like sleep and exercise outweigh any potential supplements, though others noted such optimization is often a luxury of the wealthy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48100042&quot; title=&quot;Are there any supplements that can work for neurogenesis? I&amp;#39;ve heard Lions Mane extract can do this, but I&amp;#39;m not sure. Anybody know of anything?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48100363&quot; title=&quot;If you don&amp;#39;t sleep 8+ hours a day every single day, exercise regularly, live in a place with clean air, eat clean food, don&amp;#39;t drink alcohol, etc. you&amp;#39;re losing your time, no amount of supplement will make up for our modern way of life, you&amp;#39;re going to optimise the 0.1% while missing the 99.9% that matters&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48100647&quot; title=&quot;That is true, but keep in mind that routine is very difficult to do for someone that makes their living running the rat race, with stress, no time, responsibilities, worry, untreated health problems, etc. If you have the money, job security, then you&amp;#39;ll have peace of mind. That will then allow one to live that kind of optimized lifestyle.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nvlabs.github.io/cuda-oxide/index.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;CUDA-oxide: Nvidia&amp;#39;s official Rust to CUDA compiler&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nvlabs.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48096692&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;424 points · 117 comments · by adamnemecek&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NVIDIA has introduced cuda-oxide, an experimental alpha-stage compiler that allows developers to write SIMT GPU kernels in idiomatic Rust by compiling code directly to PTX. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nvlabs.github.io/cuda-oxide/index.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: The cuda-oxide Book — cuda-oxide    URL Source: https://nvlabs.github.io/cuda-oxide/index.html    Published Time: Tue, 12 May 2026 04:56:23 GMT    Markdown Content:  # The cuda-oxide Book — cuda-oxide    [Skip to main content](https://nvlabs.github.io/cuda-oxide/index.html#main-content)    Back to top Ctrl+K    [![Image 1: NVIDIA](https://nvlabs.github.io/cuda-oxide/_static/nvidia-logo-horiz-rgb-blk-for-screen.svg)![Image 2:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users view CUDA-oxide as a significant improvement for Rust developers working with custom kernels &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48097798&quot; title=&quot;This is a bit good for Rust if you want to use the language with CUDA. The problem is, it still doesn&amp;#39;t really move the needle if you really don&amp;#39;t like running closed source drivers and runtime binaries and care about open source. Continuing from this discussion [0], this only makes it a Rust or a CUDA problem rather than a Python, CUDA and a PyTorch one if there bug in one of them. Yet at the end of the day, it still uses Nvidia&amp;#39;s closed source CUDA compiler &amp;#39;nvcc&amp;#39; which they will never open…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48097693&quot; title=&quot;This is amazing.. ive been working with custom CUDA kernels and https://crates.io/crates/cudarc for a long time, and this honestly looks like it could be a near drop-in replacement. im especially curious how build times would compare? Most Rust CUDA crates obv rely on calling CMake or nvcc, which can make compilation painfully slow. coincidentally, just last week i was profiling build times and found that tools like sccache can dramatically reduce rebuild times by caching artifacts - but you…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others criticize the project for its unprofessional documentation and reliance on Nvidia&amp;#39;s closed-source ecosystem &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48097798&quot; title=&quot;This is a bit good for Rust if you want to use the language with CUDA. The problem is, it still doesn&amp;#39;t really move the needle if you really don&amp;#39;t like running closed source drivers and runtime binaries and care about open source. Continuing from this discussion [0], this only makes it a Rust or a CUDA problem rather than a Python, CUDA and a PyTorch one if there bug in one of them. Yet at the end of the day, it still uses Nvidia&amp;#39;s closed source CUDA compiler &amp;#39;nvcc&amp;#39; which they will never open…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48099451&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; (em dash) no DSLs, no foreign language bindings, just Rust. Official CUDA port and they couldn&amp;#39;t even bother with the introductory paragraph. Okay, I&amp;#39;ll try to ignore it and read the docs. Hey a custom IR, this sounds interesti- &amp;gt; MLIR’s implementation, however, is C++ with a side of TableGen, a build system that requires you to compile all of LLVM, and debugging sessions that make you question your career choices. I can&amp;#39;t take this industry seriously anymore.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. A major point of contention is the lack of first-class automatic differentiation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48097945&quot; title=&quot;Personally I really don&amp;#39;t want new GPU languages that do not have AD as a first class citizen. I mean rust is an improvement over C++ CUDA but still.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, with some skeptics questioning the quality of the codebase due to suspected AI generation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48099797&quot; title=&quot;I think the whole codebase was more or less written by AI...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48100008&quot; title=&quot;that ship has long sailed, &amp;#39;it no longer matters&amp;#39;  saying a codebase, an article was written with AI doesn&amp;#39;t mean much, it could be good, it could be bad.  folks often say it to generate outrage, but that means nothing.   is the codebase great, good, bad, terrible?  that&amp;#39;s the only thing that matters.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these concerns, the tool is seen as a potential &amp;#34;drop-in replacement&amp;#34; for existing crates that currently suffer from slow build times due to external `nvcc` calls &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48097693&quot; title=&quot;This is amazing.. ive been working with custom CUDA kernels and https://crates.io/crates/cudarc for a long time, and this honestly looks like it could be a near drop-in replacement. im especially curious how build times would compare? Most Rust CUDA crates obv rely on calling CMake or nvcc, which can make compilation painfully slow. coincidentally, just last week i was profiling build times and found that tools like sccache can dramatically reduce rebuild times by caching artifacts - but you…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/09/business/dealbook/ai-notetakers-legal-risk.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A.I. note takers are making lawyers nervous&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nytimes.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48093043&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;263 points · 190 comments · by JumpCrisscross&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/09/business/dealbook/ai-notetakers-legal-risk.html&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary concern regarding AI note-takers is their potential to turn casual conversations into permanent, discoverable records that could void attorney-client privilege or expose unethical corporate behavior &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48093752&quot; title=&quot;The main point raised in the article is that these bots may void attorney client privileges. But the real danger with these IMO is that they&amp;#39;re turning casual conversations into a permanent record, and one that will be completely discoverable in court, should the company get into trouble later.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48094019&quot; title=&quot;Basically, it will be harder to hide illegal and unethical stuff companies routinely engage in.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Users report significant accuracy issues, noting that the tools often &amp;#34;hallucinate&amp;#34; or play &amp;#34;madlibs&amp;#34; when audio quality is poor, leading to dangerous errors like substituting &amp;#34;Russia&amp;#34; for &amp;#34;France&amp;#34; in sensitive contexts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48093791&quot; title=&quot;Plus they are super inaccurate. Gemini gets one of its three bullet subtly or very majorly wrong almost every time.  Just a few weeks ago Gemini said we’re rolling out our payment setup in Russia. You know the place where we have 20+ sanctions packages on? We were talking about France in the meeting.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48093849&quot; title=&quot;We&amp;#39;ve found they&amp;#39;re surprisingly good if everyone on the call is using a decent headset. The problems start when using conference room audio or someone is on their laptop mic. If they miss a word they never do unintelligible , they just start playing madlibs based on the rest of the sentence. We just went through a round of 100+ (non-sensitive) VoC interviews and they really cut down the workload of compiling all of the feedback. If the audio was a little shaky though, we pretty much had to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48093884&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If they miss a word they never do unintelligible, they just start playing madlibs based on the rest of the sentence. Imo this is the single biggest flaw of LLMs. They&amp;#39;re great at a lot of things, but knowing when they&amp;#39;re wrong (or don&amp;#39;t have enough information to actually work on) is a critical flaw. IMO there&amp;#39;s nothing structural about why they shouldn&amp;#39;t be able to spot this and correct themselves - I suspect it&amp;#39;s a training issue. But presumably bots that infer context/fill in the dots rank…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some find them useful for reducing workloads during non-sensitive interviews &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48093849&quot; title=&quot;We&amp;#39;ve found they&amp;#39;re surprisingly good if everyone on the call is using a decent headset. The problems start when using conference room audio or someone is on their laptop mic. If they miss a word they never do unintelligible , they just start playing madlibs based on the rest of the sentence. We just went through a round of 100+ (non-sensitive) VoC interviews and they really cut down the workload of compiling all of the feedback. If the audio was a little shaky though, we pretty much had to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that the underlying transformer architecture lacks an inherent &amp;#34;I don&amp;#39;t know&amp;#34; state, making them fundamentally prone to confident inaccuracies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48094362&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think it&amp;#39;s a training issue, it&amp;#39;s simply that there&amp;#39;s no inherent &amp;#39;I don&amp;#39;t know&amp;#39; in the transformer architecture unless it&amp;#39;s really like something completely unknown, otherwise the nearest neighbor will be chosen and that will be whatever sounds similar or is relevant, even if it might cause a problem&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48095136&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s just a token predictor what do you expect? What we need are tools that embrace that and ping the agent to validate what it just said or double check. But the trade off is that this might hamper their capabilities to some level&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. This environment has led some professionals to practice strict self-censorship, assuming all digital communications are effectively recorded and subject to future scrutiny &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48094940&quot; title=&quot;Back when I was in college, in a fraternity, we always assumed that the phones were tapped. Specifically, we never spoke about alcohol or marijuana (now legal) on the phone. Even today, I generally assume that my phone could be tapped; even when talking with my trusted work colleagues, friends, and family. I&amp;#39;m extra careful about dirty jokes or &amp;#39;grey morality&amp;#39; in video conferences and email. The same applies to speaking with lawyers. You never know when some motivated asshole wants to twist…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48095573&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Even today, I generally assume that my phone could be tapped; even when talking with my trusted work colleagues, friends, and family. I&amp;#39;m extra careful about dirty jokes or &amp;#39;grey morality&amp;#39; in video conferences and email. This is horrifying. Why do you feel the necessity to self-censor? What consequences do you anticipate?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.flyingpenguin.com/can-someone-please-explain-whether-cloudflare-blackmailed-canonical/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Can someone please explain whether Cloudflare blackmailed Canonical?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (flyingpenguin.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48098537&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;284 points · 168 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Following a massive 2026 cyberattack on Canonical, questions have emerged regarding a potential &amp;#34;protection racket&amp;#34; as the company was forced to subscribe to Cloudflare for relief while the attackers reportedly used tools hosted by that same provider. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.flyingpenguin.com/can-someone-please-explain-whether-cloudflare-blackmailed-canonical/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Can Someone Please Explain Whether Cloudflare Blackmailed Canonical?    URL Source: https://www.flyingpenguin.com/can-someone-please-explain-whether-cloudflare-blackmailed-canonical/    Markdown Content:  # Can Someone Please Explain Whether Cloudflare Blackmailed Canonical? | flyingpenguin  [Skip to content](https://www.flyingpenguin.com/can-someone-please-explain-whether-cloudflare-blackmailed-canonical/#content)    [![Image 1:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether Cloudflare’s refusal to deplatform DDoS-for-hire marketing sites constitutes a &amp;#34;protection racket&amp;#34; by shielding attackers while billing victims for relief &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48099215&quot; title=&quot;The article puts it very succinctly: Cloudflare fronts attackers for free and bills the victims for relief. Ddos protection services can be cast as a digital protection racket where they have a perverse incentive to keep attackers attacking.  “It&amp;#39;s a dangerous internet out there; you&amp;#39;d better pay us to protect your website from the attackers using our free tier.”  At the least, even if there is no active collusion or profit sharing or anything like that, there is not a clear side that the DDos…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48100268&quot; title=&quot;In The Before Times, there were very few problematic DDOS operations because... they would all DDOS one another offline. Websites, control infrastructure, anything. DDOS protection services were provided by companies like Akamai; call for pricing, big companies only, absolutely no anonymous sign-ups. Cloudflare revolutionised the industry by providing free DDOS protection to anyone, including DDOS-for-hire services. Preventing them from DDOSing one another offline really let the DDOS industry…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue Cloudflare’s Terms of Service should prohibit sites that facilitate technical abuse &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48100357&quot; title=&quot;Most companies have TOS that include not damaging or attacking the company itself. The advertised service attacks Cloudflare explicitly. It seems very straightforward that this would violate any reasonable TOS. edit: and here it is straight from their TOS https://www.cloudflare.com/en-ca/website-terms/ &amp;#39;7. PROHIBITED USES As a condition of your use of the Websites and Online Services, you will not use the Websites or Online Services for any purpose that is unlawful or prohibited by these Terms.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that hosting a marketing page is distinct from hosting the actual attack infrastructure, which typically utilizes residential proxies rather than Cloudflare’s servers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48100108&quot; title=&quot;people will always be able to pick a handful of sites they think shouldnt be allowed to use cloudflare hosting services. the problem is that every person will have a different handful of sites. cloudflare should host everything and anything unless and until a lawful order is received. if they start sticking their fingers into sites and determining whether the site&amp;#39;s content is &amp;#39;appropriate&amp;#39; or whatever, based on some sort of nebulous set of criteria, people will get (justifiably) big mad about…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48100438&quot; title=&quot;cloudflare is not hosting the infrastructure doing the actual attacks. the attack is coming from residential proxy servers, not from the webpage being hosted by cloudflare, which is just a marketing page and a login portal. that clause is not really applicable. in any case, its not a question of whether cloudflare can remove a website. of course they can, for whatever reason they want. its a question of whether we want to be in a world where cloudflare starts making content-based decisions on…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48099209&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Renting attack capacity from [cloudflare]&amp;#39; is inaccurate as I understand things. That group hosts their site behind cloudflare but I have not seen anyone claim that cloudflare&amp;#39;s infra is used for the attacks. This whole article seems conflate hosting an informational site run by the attackers and hosting the attack itself.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, there is a divide between those who believe Cloudflare should remain a neutral utility until receiving lawful orders and those who feel their free tier has inadvertently enabled the DDoS industry to flourish &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48100108&quot; title=&quot;people will always be able to pick a handful of sites they think shouldnt be allowed to use cloudflare hosting services. the problem is that every person will have a different handful of sites. cloudflare should host everything and anything unless and until a lawful order is received. if they start sticking their fingers into sites and determining whether the site&amp;#39;s content is &amp;#39;appropriate&amp;#39; or whatever, based on some sort of nebulous set of criteria, people will get (justifiably) big mad about…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48100615&quot; title=&quot;Articles like these seem to hold a weird belief that Cloudflare does not react to security reports or legal orders? From my experience, they react appropriately and relatively quickly compared to rest of the industry. Could Cloudflare be more proactive or add more friction to their signups? Yes, probably, but the reasons they have outlined for not playing internet police make sense to me. I don&amp;#39;t think it should be a requirement to provide your credit card, phone number and a copy of your ID in…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48100268&quot; title=&quot;In The Before Times, there were very few problematic DDOS operations because... they would all DDOS one another offline. Websites, control infrastructure, anything. DDOS protection services were provided by companies like Akamai; call for pricing, big companies only, absolutely no anonymous sign-ups. Cloudflare revolutionised the industry by providing free DDOS protection to anyone, including DDOS-for-hire services. Preventing them from DDOSing one another offline really let the DDOS industry…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/11/us/politics/google-hackers-attack-ai.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Google says criminal hackers used AI to find a major software flaw&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nytimes.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48094641&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;243 points · 177 comments · by donohoe&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google reported that a criminal hacker group used artificial intelligence to discover and attempt to exploit a major software vulnerability, marking a significant escalation in how attackers leverage AI for large-scale cyberattacks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/11/us/politics/google-hackers-attack-ai.html&quot; title=&quot;Unlocked: &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.nytimes.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;05&amp;amp;#x2F;11&amp;amp;#x2F;us&amp;amp;#x2F;politics&amp;amp;#x2F;google-hackers-attack-ai.html?unlocked_article_code=1.hlA.vW7Y.pO_0G8yLYoca&amp;amp;amp;smid=nytcore-android-share&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.nytimes.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;05&amp;amp;#x2F;11&amp;amp;#x2F;us&amp;amp;#x2F;politics&amp;amp;#x2F;google-hacker...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;I4Ui5&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;I4Ui5&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters expressed significant skepticism regarding Google&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;high confidence&amp;#34; that AI was used to find the flaw, questioning how such a determination could be made without access to the attackers&amp;#39; private chat transcripts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48102266&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; “We have high confidence that the actor likely leveraged an A.I. model to support the discovery and weaponization of this vulnerability,” the report said. I wonder what gives them that &amp;#39;high confidence&amp;#39;, as opposed to this being just a traditional zero-day? I&amp;#39;m not being snarky or critical, I&amp;#39;m genuinely wondering what about an attack could possibly indicate it was discovered with LLM assistance? Like, unless the attackers&amp;#39; computers have been seized and they&amp;#39;ve been able to recover the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48102371&quot; title=&quot;Presumably the attacker used Google&amp;#39;s own LLM and they searched the history of all user chats to find the transcript. I say this only slightly in jest, as that&amp;#39;s about the only thing I can think of which would legitimately give them &amp;#39;high confidence&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users dismissed the report as potential marketing hype or &amp;#34;parroting&amp;#34; of company claims &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48101020&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;But new A.I. models like Anthropic’s Mythos, which was announced last month, appear to be so good at finding such holes that Anthropic shared it only with a limited number of firms and government agencies in the United States and Britain. Immediate distrust of the article. GPT 5.5 is out with nearly the same capability. The author might be parroting company marketing, unable to discern that a lot of this is much less complex than it seems. For all we know this group could have had a model…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others defended the journalist&amp;#39;s extensive background in intelligence reporting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48101237&quot; title=&quot;Immediate distrust of the article… The author might be parroting company marketing, unable to discern that a lot of this is much less complex than it seems. https://www.nytimes.com/by/dustin-volz &amp;gt; I am based in The Times’s Washington bureau, and much of my focus is on the dealings of U.S. cybersecurity and intelligence agencies, including the National Security Agency, Central Intelligence Agency, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, as well…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlighted concerns that security risks will be used as a pretext to restrict open-weight models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48101044&quot; title=&quot;Security will be a wedge to restrict the sophistication of open-weight and local LLMs, just as it&amp;#39;s been used to demonize and restrict cypherpunk technologies.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48101938&quot; title=&quot;If America just banned all chinese models that would wipe out most of the open weights landscape in AI, especially anything close to the frontier. I could easily see that happening if a Mythos tier model comes out of a Chinese lab in early 2027. It doesn&amp;#39;t meaningfully change the research competition between OAI/Anthropic/Google/SpaceX but it does pad all of their pockets by removing cheap competition and it gives the government far greater control over AI usage de facto.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, though some argue the global AI arms race makes such domestic lockdowns unlikely &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48101856&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Security will be a wedge to restrict the sophistication of open-weight and local LLMs, just as it&amp;#39;s been used to demonize and restrict cypherpunk technologies Unlikely in America or China. This is not a game either can singularly control, and locking down the R&amp;amp;D means conceding momentum to the party that doesn&amp;#39;t. Which means use restrictions will be contained to countries satisfied with playing second fiddle. Instead, I suspect we&amp;#39;ll see momentum towards running software on…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://thinkingmachines.ai/blog/interaction-models/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interaction Models&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (thinkingmachines.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48100524&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;331 points · 53 comments · by smhx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thinking Machines has unveiled a research preview of &amp;#34;interaction models,&amp;#34; natively multimodal AI trained from scratch to handle real-time audio, video, and text collaboration without external scaffolding. The system uses a micro-turn architecture to enable seamless dialogue, simultaneous speech, and proactive visual responses. &lt;a href=&quot;https://thinkingmachines.ai/blog/interaction-models/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Interaction Models: A Scalable Approach to Human-AI Collaboration    URL Source: https://thinkingmachines.ai/blog/interaction-models/    Markdown Content:  Today, we’re announcing a research preview of interaction models: models that handle interaction natively rather than through external scaffolding. We think interactivity should scale alongside intelligence; the way we work with AI should not be treated as an afterthought. Interaction models let people collaborate with AI the way we…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide between users impressed by the model&amp;#39;s naturalistic &amp;#34;full duplex&amp;#34; communication and those who find the interactions contrived or awkward &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48102110&quot; title=&quot;These videos are worth a watch. There are tons of impressive moments, but they had me at the very first one where a woman says: &amp;#39;I&amp;#39;m going to tell you a story,&amp;#39; and then pauses for a long, luxurious sip from a cup of coffee, and the model ... does nothing, just waits. Take my money. Speaking of taking my money, what&amp;#39;s the economic model for a company like this? They&amp;#39;ve published a fair amount about their architecture - enough that I imagine frontier labs could implement. Patents? Trade secrets?…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48101618&quot; title=&quot;Very cool! The demos felt fairly contrived - e.g., count things while I talk. I wonder what more useful or commercial applications look like.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48104133&quot; title=&quot;am i the only person not impressed by this ? it just feels akward still with pauses and doesnt openai offer voice cadence already&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some question the economic viability of publishing research that competitors could copy, others argue that &amp;#34;data recipes,&amp;#34; custom infrastructure, and specialized tuning are more critical than the architectural secrets found in papers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48102110&quot; title=&quot;These videos are worth a watch. There are tons of impressive moments, but they had me at the very first one where a woman says: &amp;#39;I&amp;#39;m going to tell you a story,&amp;#39; and then pauses for a long, luxurious sip from a cup of coffee, and the model ... does nothing, just waits. Take my money. Speaking of taking my money, what&amp;#39;s the economic model for a company like this? They&amp;#39;ve published a fair amount about their architecture - enough that I imagine frontier labs could implement. Patents? Trade secrets?…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48103077&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; They&amp;#39;ve published a fair amount about their architecture - enough that I imagine frontier labs could implement. i think the real ones know this is the tip of the iceberg? hparam tuning, data recipes, data collection, custom kernels, rl/eval infra, all immensely deep topics that would condense multiple decades of phd lifetimes to produce SOTA performance (in both senses of the word) like this. i would also calibrate what you are impressed by. simply waiting is a posttrain thing - the fact that…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48103939&quot; title=&quot;Yes they can. Your research papers are not the whole story. It’s like google could open source their entire monorepo and very little would change. No one else could operate it.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also speculation that the company’s strategy may involve being acquired by a larger tech giant, similar to industry patterns in the US and China &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48104221&quot; title=&quot;In China it&amp;#39;s become well known that promising new companies will get an offer from either Alibaba or Tencent. In the US, it&amp;#39;s probably simmilar. Everything that&amp;#39;s out in the open can get acquired or simply copied. Maybe that is what Thinking Machines is hoping as well?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-microsoft-israel-chief-leaves-amid-ethical-controversy-1001542602&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft Israel chief leaves amid ethical controversy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (en.globes.co.il)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48097796&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;196 points · 164 comments · by bhouston&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft Israel General Manager Alon Haimovich is departing following a global investigation into alleged unethical and non-transparent use of Azure cloud services by the Israeli Ministry of Defense. Consequently, Microsoft has placed its Israeli branch under the direct management of Microsoft France. &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-microsoft-israel-chief-leaves-amid-ethical-controversy-1001542602&quot; title=&quot;Microsoft Israel chief leaves amid ethical controversy    &amp;amp;nbsp;    [![Globes English](https://res.cloudinary.com/globes/image/upload/v1755776851/en/globes_eng_logo_mbzv27.svg)](/en)    search    * [G](/en/)  * [Front](/en/)  * [News](/en/news/)  * [Comment](/en/comment/)  * [Features](/en/features/)  * [MARKET](/en/market.tag)  * [ECONOMY](/en/economy.tag)  * [ENERGY](/en/energy.tag)  * [HEALTHCARE](/en/healthcare.tag)  * [TECH](/en/it.tag)  * [REAL ESTATE](/en/realestate.tag)  * [START UPS](/en/startups.tag)    *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The departure of Microsoft Israel’s chief highlights the company&amp;#39;s unique position as the &amp;#34;least Israel-friendly&amp;#34; of the major cloud providers, having lost the government&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;Nimbus&amp;#34; contract to Google and Amazon &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48098487&quot; title=&quot;TIL that Microsoft is the least Israel-friendly of the big three clouds: &amp;gt; Among the cloud giants, Microsoft is considered the most vulnerable to anti-Israel protests and allegations of the use made by the Ministry of Defense on Azure, its cloud platforms, since it is the only company among the three major cloud companies that has not signed a special agreement with the Israeli government and the Ministry of Defense. The industry says that Haimovich, who is known as a prominent salesman with…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that American tech companies should avoid complicity in alleged human rights violations and war crimes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48098463&quot; title=&quot;Israel consistently flaunts international law, has been accused of war crimes by the Hague, and the UN has found it most likely has committed and continues to commit genocide in Gaza. So I am not surprised that dealing with the country&amp;#39;s Defense apparatus would lead to ethical concerns. Every international company should think twice about doing business with the Israeli government or companies rooted in defense and cybersecurity.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48098726&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; TIL that Microsoft is the least Israel-friendly of the big three clouds This is a good thing. American companies should not be allowing their tech to be used to in the gross ongoing human rights violations in Israel/Gaza/West Bank. Google and Amazon knew their tech could be used for human rights abuses in Israel (their lawyers warned them so) but ignored that in favour of $$$ per the EFF: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/google-and-amazon-ackn...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48098887&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; American companies should not be allowing their tech to be used to in the gross ongoing human rights violations in Israel/Gaza/West Bank. Fully agreed, but also a hard sell given that America itself does not recognize what is happening there as a genocide. Something something man understanding depending on his salary. Americans only give a shit about the price of gas and eggs. Whoever has to die to keep those down is apparently fine with the majority of our population.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others debate whether the conflict meets the specific legal threshold of &amp;#34;genocide&amp;#34; versus &amp;#34;ethnic cleansing&amp;#34; or standard warfare &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48098762&quot; title=&quot;Honestly it&amp;#39;s difficult for me to respond to this comment because the premise is so clearly flawed. A semblance of civilian life does not mean genocide did not or is not taking place. Wholesale population displacement, destruction of a significant percentage of civilian structures, bombings, raids, land and sea blockades, statements from leaders that suggest genocidal intent... these point in the other direction. Would it only be genocide only if no child in Gaza was smiling? If no one was…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48098790&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Wholesale population displacement, destruction of a significant percentage of civilian structures, bombings, raids, land and sea blockades,&amp;#39; These are all things that happen during war. Explain why this war is different. All war is bad. I genuinely don&amp;#39;t see how this is not a war but a genocide.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48098863&quot; title=&quot;Wholesale population displacement is explicitly not (by itself) genocide under the convention. Genocide is an intent crime, and the intent has to be the eradication of the targeted ethnic, national, racial, or religious group. Kidnapping all the children in an occupied territory and dispersing them so they can&amp;#39;t be returned to their families is genocidal. Mass displacement isn&amp;#39;t. The fixation on the term &amp;#39;genocide&amp;#39; has been a major own-goal for advocates of Palestinians. It was deliberately…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, commenters questioned the financial significance of the Israeli market relative to its population &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48099509&quot; title=&quot;I’m kind of confused, in that Israel is not that big in terms of population, about 10 million people; how much data and cloud do they need? The state of Pennsylvania is 13 million; would MSFT losing PA do them serious financial damage?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt; and raised concerns regarding the country&amp;#39;s history of leaking state secrets to foreign adversaries &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48099522&quot; title=&quot;Israel has been leaking US state secrets to China and Russia for decades. Intel and Microsoft both moved core R&amp;amp;D hubs to Israel even after the country had been caught leaking US secrets. Israel is not an ally of the United States, end of story.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.404media.co/ucf-ai-commencement-speaker-booed/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Students Boo Commencement Speaker After She Calls AI Next Industrial Revolution&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (404media.co)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48096674&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;154 points · &lt;strong&gt;189 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by cdrnsf&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Graduating humanities students at the University of Central Florida booed commencement speaker Gloria Caulfield after she described the rise of artificial intelligence as the &amp;#34;next industrial revolution.&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.404media.co/ucf-ai-commencement-speaker-booed/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Students Boo Commencement Speaker After She Calls AI the ‘Next Industrial Revolution’    URL Source: https://www.404media.co/ucf-ai-commencement-speaker-booed/    Published Time: 2026-05-11T13:03:56.000Z    Markdown Content:  # Students Boo Commencement Speaker After She Calls AI the ‘Next Industrial Revolution’    Listen to the [404 Media Podcast](https://www.404media.co/the-404-media-podcast/)    [](https://www.404media.co/ucf-ai-commencement-speaker-booed/)    ###### Account    *   [Log…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a deep generational and cultural divide, with critics arguing that AI proponents risk alienating young adults by promoting a &amp;#34;banal hellscape&amp;#34; of unappealing, superficially plausible content &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48098677&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s a very real possibility that AI proponents completely lose the next generation of adults. The output is not enjoyable to consume, the people who rely on it are not cool, and the effects of using it are unpleasant and hard to defend on aesthetic, intellectual, or moral grounds. There are real use cases for this technology! But the idea that the generation of superficially plausible text is &amp;#39;the next Industrial Revolution&amp;#39; comes out of the same mindset that has turned a neat technology…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48098818&quot; title=&quot;That will happen inevitably, we are throwing spaghetti at the wall right now, and cleaning up the mess, lessons will be learned.  The question is whether that phase will lead to real lasting damage and to what.  For myself I no longer read cold emails, I believe they are all AI generated, and that communication method may legitimately die culturally.  What else will be destroyed?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some defend the technology as a revolutionary shift that will automate &amp;#34;necessary evils&amp;#34; like manual coding &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48099213&quot; title=&quot;IMHO shrugging it off as “superficially plausible text” is the extreme to the other side. We’re past plausible text since GPT-2 and it’s undeniable that the technology is making waves right now and is having an impact. As you can’t judge the impact of the Industrial Revolution by the first steam engines, you can’t dismiss the impact the technology is having right now.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48098564&quot; title=&quot;Do we want to be distracted by sewing shirts and writing Python scripts when the hardware can do the math for us? Programmers (and other workers but this a tech centric forum) need to start to accept that programming was a necessary evil of the before times. We didn&amp;#39;t have the theories. We didn&amp;#39;t have the manufacturing techniques. Before hardware was powerful enough to run models on a laptop we needed all that hand crafted custom state management to avoid immediate resource exhaustion. Or to…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that it threatens to ruin art and cultural value while offering no economic security to those it replaces &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48098188&quot; title=&quot;If you want people to like AI, show them a future that doesn&amp;#39;t leave them in abject poverty.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48098328&quot; title=&quot;Yes, but during those transformations, the CEOs of the companies selling the products involved weren&amp;#39;t actively and aggressively marketing them as being able to replace all the humans they employ . You can&amp;#39;t have it both ways: either LLMs are an amazing, revolutionary technology that can replace many human jobs in unprecedented ways, or it&amp;#39;s going to be a mild transition that really only helps people.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48099309&quot; title=&quot;No. It ruins art, ruins music, ruins communication and on and on. It&amp;#39;s cancerous with respect to anything related to art or cultural value.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Skeptics point out that unlike previous digital transformations, current AI marketing aggressively focuses on human replacement, fueling fears of widespread poverty despite historical trends of poverty reduction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48098188&quot; title=&quot;If you want people to like AI, show them a future that doesn&amp;#39;t leave them in abject poverty.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48098243&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s quite an unsubstantiated leap. The world has gone through plenty of digital transformations and the number of people in poverty has only _shrank_.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48098328&quot; title=&quot;Yes, but during those transformations, the CEOs of the companies selling the products involved weren&amp;#39;t actively and aggressively marketing them as being able to replace all the humans they employ . You can&amp;#39;t have it both ways: either LLMs are an amazing, revolutionary technology that can replace many human jobs in unprecedented ways, or it&amp;#39;s going to be a mild transition that really only helps people.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://killedbyapple.theden.sh/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Killed by Apple&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (killedbyapple.theden.sh)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48095468&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;127 points · 122 comments · by theden&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This comprehensive list chronicles the hardware, software, and services discontinued by Apple over several decades, ranging from iconic products like the iPod and iMac G3 to failed experiments such as the AirPower charging mat and the &amp;#34;trash can&amp;#34; Mac Pro. &lt;a href=&quot;https://killedbyapple.theden.sh/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Killed by Apple    URL Source: https://killedbyapple.theden.sh/    Markdown Content:  🧀    Mac Pro    Mac    Hardware    Apple&amp;#39;s tower workstation line for professionals who needed maximum expansion and maximum invoices. After years of shrinking relevance beside Mac Studio, Apple finally discontinued the line entirely.    📱    iPhone SE (3rd gen)    Hardware    iPhone    Apple&amp;#39;s last iPhone with a Home button, Touch ID, an LCD screen, and a Lightning port. Discontinued when Apple replaced the SE line with the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether Apple &amp;#34;kills&amp;#34; products through active cancellation or passive neglect, with some arguing that the list conflates aging hardware with intentional termination &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48095750&quot; title=&quot;I think this conflates &amp;#39;old&amp;#39; with &amp;#39;killed&amp;#39;.  Most of the stuff is just old. I would say the Mac Pro was &amp;#39;killed&amp;#39;, left to languish after the trashcan model, then isolated from third party GPUs when it finally got upgraded to Apple Silicon, and then left to languish again until the lack of sales justified killing it. Rosetta 2 will certainly deserve a spot on this list next year when they start yeeting it, an amazing piece of technology that has made Apple Silicon-era Macs uniquely capable of…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48096046&quot; title=&quot;I think it&amp;#39;s important to highlight Apple&amp;#39;s mentality : That old devices are dead to them, and the pretending that they don&amp;#39;t even exist anymore. I have a house full of Apple hardware and none of them get updates from Apple anymore, and I can&amp;#39;t manually update them without hackery (OpenCore) or wiping them to install Linux (where possible). Also, because third party app developers largely align with Apple&amp;#39;s philosophy, less and less 3rd party software even works on my computers anymore. Heck,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics highlight Apple&amp;#39;s tendency to abandon older devices via software locks and tier-based support, effectively forcing obsolescence even when the hardware remains functional &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48096046&quot; title=&quot;I think it&amp;#39;s important to highlight Apple&amp;#39;s mentality : That old devices are dead to them, and the pretending that they don&amp;#39;t even exist anymore. I have a house full of Apple hardware and none of them get updates from Apple anymore, and I can&amp;#39;t manually update them without hackery (OpenCore) or wiping them to install Linux (where possible). Also, because third party app developers largely align with Apple&amp;#39;s philosophy, less and less 3rd party software even works on my computers anymore. Heck,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48096825&quot; title=&quot;I always thought it was strange how intolerant Homebrew is of users who are not surfing the bleeding edge. I held out using MacPorts for ages, but there came a point when I just could not reasonably expect to find the software I needed on MacPorts, but could on Homebrew, and so I switched. I wish Homebrew hadn&amp;#39;t won that particular mindshare war. Moving from MacPorts to Homebrew felt like downgrading from an actual package manager to a duct-taped shell script.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some defend the company&amp;#39;s focus on innovation over longevity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48095663&quot; title=&quot;The whole premise of this site is very negative and pessimistic in nature. Why the emphasis on &amp;#39;killed&amp;#39;, rather than &amp;#39;innovated&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;created&amp;#39;? The expectation should not be for products to last for ever. And for each product that happened, more products came after that were inspired by it.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others point to the loss of software compatibility over time as evidence of a declining user experience compared to the stability of other platforms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48095983&quot; title=&quot;I think so, Macs can run software written for Android, iOS, Mac, Windows and Linux, everything else is incapable of running the iOS and Mac stuff.  Virtualizing macOS from a Linux or Windows sucks for arbitrary reasons, and both macOS and iOS are missing a compatibility shim like WINE.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48096133&quot; title=&quot;All this sounds great in theory, but Mac does not have a particularly stable ABI and it&amp;#39;s fairly common for closed source software from 5+ years ago to just not run.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://interfaze.ai/blog/interfaze-a-new-model-architecture-built-for-high-accuracy-at-scale&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interfaze: A new model architecture built for high accuracy at scale&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (interfaze.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48097078&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;126 points · 31 comments · by yoeven&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Interfaze is a new hybrid model architecture that combines deep neural networks with transformers to outperform models like Gemini-3-Flash and GPT-5.4-Mini in deterministic tasks, including OCR, speech-to-text, and structured data extraction, while maintaining high accuracy and low costs at scale. &lt;a href=&quot;https://interfaze.ai/blog/interfaze-a-new-model-architecture-built-for-high-accuracy-at-scale&quot; title=&quot;Title: Interfaze: A new model architecture built for high accuracy at scale    URL Source: https://interfaze.ai/blog/interfaze-a-new-model-architecture-built-for-high-accuracy-at-scale    Published Time: 2026-05-11    Markdown Content:  copy markdown    **tl;dr**: Interfaze is a new model architecture that outperforms models like Gemini-3-Flash, Claude-Sonnet-4.6, GPT-5.4-Mini, and Grok-4.3 across 9 head-to-head benchmarks in OCR, vision, STT, and structured output.    Humans are inefficient at…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Interfaze is praised for its high accuracy in difficult OCR tasks, such as digitizing distorted, typewritten pages where general LLMs previously failed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48100502&quot; title=&quot;Amazing! I just tried the OCR capabilities with a photo of a DIN A4 page which was written with a typewriter. The image isn&amp;#39;t the easiest to interpret. The text perspective is distorted because the page is part of a book and the page margin toward the spine of the book is very small. There are also many inline corrections due to typing errors while the page was written (backspace couldn&amp;#39;t erase characters back then, and arrow keys couldn&amp;#39;t be used to add text in between existing words). Over…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While the model&amp;#39;s task-specific architecture provides metadata like bounding boxes and confidence scores, some users question if its performance benchmarks are misleading by comparing specialized models to general-purpose ones &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48098118&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; These are deep neural network architectures that are task-specific for things like OCR, translation, or GUI detection. The way they consume and see data is trained to be task specific, which makes them up to 100x more accurate at their specific task. They also produce useful metadata like bounding boxes and confidence scores, letting developers build predictable workflows they can rely on. Does code extraction and manipulation fit in that?  Would interfaze be the agent that a coding agent…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48100047&quot; title=&quot;What I want are precise and tight bounding boxes. Why is this so difficult?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48102663&quot; title=&quot;Ok that&amp;#39;s...just cheating. You can&amp;#39;t take a benchmark like MMLU designed to test the performance of a single general language model and compare it to performance of a small specialized model designed to do well on MMLU.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is ongoing debate regarding whether structured output quality is inherent to model size or an orthogonal capability, as well as technical curiosity about the underlying use of convolutional layers or Mixture of Agents (MoA) routing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48097986&quot; title=&quot;Smaller models really arent great at structured output. If this works it would be great for a local model that might not be as good but as long as it respects structured output will be vastly more useful.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48099741&quot; title=&quot;This is very cool, though I don&amp;#39;t understand exactly what they&amp;#39;ve done here. Is it some kind of LLM with convolutional layers added? The graph doesn&amp;#39;t exactly make it clear but it describes a pipeline that goes beyond the LLM, so the CNN could be a separate model there.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48099014&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Smaller models really arent great at structured output. That doesn&amp;#39;t seem to hold true. Consider gpt-5.4-nano which supports structured output just fine. https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/gpt-5.4-nano It seems like a concern that&amp;#39;s orthogonal to the model size.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48099968&quot; title=&quot;So is this basically a task-specific MoA transformer arch with a DNN that helps make routing decisions? Trying to understand this.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-10</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-10</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116550899908879585&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hardware Attestation as Monopoly Enabler&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (grapheneos.social)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086190&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1230 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 402 comments · by ChuckMcM&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GrapheneOS warns that Apple and Google are using hardware attestation to create a mobile duopoly by forcing services to require &amp;#34;approved&amp;#34; devices, effectively locking out alternative operating systems and competing hardware from banking, government services, and the broader web. &lt;a href=&quot;https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116550899908879585&quot; title=&quot;Title: GrapheneOS (@GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social)    URL Source: https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116550899908879585    Published Time: 2026-05-10T15:06:36Z    Markdown Content:  [![Image 1](https://grapheneos.social/system/accounts/avatars/109/415/078/265/909/169/original/c74b93c7870e37a0.png) **GrapheneOS**@GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social](https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS)    Apple and Google are gradually expanding their use of hardware-based attestation. They&amp;#39;re convincing a growing number of…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The integration of hardware attestation into the EU Digital Identity Wallet (EUDI) has sparked criticism that it undermines digital sovereignty by tying essential government services to an American mobile duopoly &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086778&quot; title=&quot;The EU Digital (identity) Wallet EUDI requires hardware attestation by Google or Apple, effectively tying all the digital EU identities to American duopoly. Talk about digital sovereignity. Apparently protecting the children &amp;gt; sovereignity. https://gitlab.opencode.de/bmi/eudi-wallet/wallet-developmen...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086866&quot; title=&quot;So with a single flip of the switch, the president of the USA can shut down our EU Digital Identity Wallet. Why was this decision ever made?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue this creates a &amp;#34;monopoly enabler&amp;#34; that allows US corporations or the government to potentially disable EU identities at will, while further eroding the concept of general-purpose computing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086866&quot; title=&quot;So with a single flip of the switch, the president of the USA can shut down our EU Digital Identity Wallet. Why was this decision ever made?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086192&quot; title=&quot;This is a really good thread on why this technology is becoming a problem for &amp;#39;open&amp;#39; anything. The argument &amp;#39;we can create our own separate web&amp;#39; is fine until all of your services are behind the web that locks you into owning a Google approved or Apple approved mobile device.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48088065&quot; title=&quot;In 1999, Intel received an absolutely massive amount  of opposition when they decided to include a software-readable serial number in their CPUs, so much that they reversed the decision. Then the &amp;#39;security&amp;#39; and Trusted Computing authoritarians continued pushing for TPMs and related tech, and contributed to the rise of mobile walled gardens. Windows 11&amp;#39;s TPM requirements were another step towards their goal. The amount of propaganda about how that was supposed to be a good thing, both here and…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest technical mitigations like zero-knowledge proofs to improve privacy, others contend that the very existence of remote attestation and digital IDs is an unacceptable normalization of surveillance and control &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48087095&quot; title=&quot;Requiring authorized silicon (and software) isn&amp;#39;t even the biggest problem here. They do not use zero knowledge proof systems or blind signatures. So every time you use your device to attest you leave behind something (the attestation packet) that can be used to link the action to your device. They put on a show about how much they care about your privacy by introducing indirection into the process (static device &amp;#39;ID&amp;#39; is used to acquire an ephemeral &amp;#39;ID&amp;#39; from an intermediate server) but it&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48088053&quot; title=&quot;Can we stop normalizing being surveilled online and on our devices? Saying something like &amp;#39;the problem is not hardware attestation, but that they don&amp;#39;t use ZKP&amp;#39;. You are normalizing the new behavior. You shouldn&amp;#39;t. It doesn&amp;#39;t matter if they use ZKP or the latest, secure technology for hardware attestation. The issue is hardware attestation. It&amp;#39;s the same with age ID. The issue is not that Age ID is prone to data leaks, the problem itself is called Age ID.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://unix.foo/posts/local-ai-needs-to-be-norm/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Local AI needs to be the norm&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (unix.foo)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085821&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;873 points · 388 comments · by cylo&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that developers should prioritize on-device AI over cloud-hosted models to improve user privacy, reduce system fragility, and eliminate unnecessary costs. By using local tools like Apple’s FoundationModels, apps can perform data transformation tasks efficiently without sending sensitive user information to external servers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://unix.foo/posts/local-ai-needs-to-be-norm/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Local AI Needs to be the Norm    URL Source: https://unix.foo/posts/local-ai-needs-to-be-norm/    Published Time: Sun, 10 May 2026 20:50:24 GMT    Markdown Content:  One of the current trends in modern software is for developers to slap an API call to OpenAI or Anthropic for features within their app. Reasonable people can quibble with whether those features are actually bringing value to users, but what I want to discuss is the fundamental concept of taking on a dependency to a cloud hosted AI…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on whether local AI is a sustainable shift or a temporary byproduct of &amp;#34;power plays&amp;#34; between global tech giants &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48087467&quot; title=&quot;For the mainstream audience, the sentiment around local ai today is the same that they had around open source a few decades ago. For a few products, some paid solutions were so much more advanced that open source were very often completely overlooked. Why bother ? And the like. Then we had captive SaaS and other plateforms and now it&amp;#39;s obviously wrong for most of us. The dependency we have with anthropic and openai for coding for instance is insane. Most accept it because either they don&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48087882&quot; title=&quot;Meta released Llama just when OpenAI was so hot and its valuation was going through the roof.  Speculating, but Meta probably thought the model not competitive enough to keep as a secret weapon but well good enough to commercially damage OpenAI who were a sudden competitor for most-valued-company? In the same way you can imagine the Chinese government pushing the release of deepseek etc to make sure no one thinks the US has “won” and to keep everyone aware that a foreign model might leapfrog in…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that hardware advances are making local execution the inevitable norm for privacy and security &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48088051&quot; title=&quot;They will be, and that moment is not that far off. We&amp;#39;ve got the progression in place already: first, large data centers could have performant LLMs, we are now firmly in &amp;#39;a bunch of servers with a couple of H100s each&amp;#39; territory, slowly going into &amp;#39;128 GB VRAM on a MacBook Pro or a Strix Halo&amp;#39;. Within the next year, the pattern of &amp;#39;expensive remote LLM for planning, local slow-but-faster-than-human LLM for execution&amp;#39; will become the norm for companies, slowly moving to &amp;#39;using local LLM for…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48089061&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; They will be, and that moment is not that far off. It&amp;#39;s here, right now. I&amp;#39;m running quantized Qwen and Gemma on a decent, but three years old gaming rig (think RTX 3080 12GB and 32 GB RAM). Yes, it&amp;#39;s slow, it has a small context window. But it can (given a proper harness) run through my trip photos and categorize them. It can OCR receipts and summarize spendings. It can answer simple questions, analyze code and even write code when little context is required. Probably I could get a…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the massive compute costs and parameter requirements for truly reliable models make local hosting an expensive, &amp;#34;delusional&amp;#34; alternative to subsidized cloud services &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48088184&quot; title=&quot;This is simply delusional, It cost 20-30k a month to run Kimi 2.6. The tokens are sold for $3 per mm. To sell tokens profitably you&amp;#39;d need to be able to run inference at 150 tokens per second for less than $1,000 USD a month. I don&amp;#39;t think people realize how expensive it is to host decently capable models and how much their use of capable models is subsidized. You can only squeeze so many parameters on consumer grade hardware(that&amp;#39;s actually affordable, two 4090s is not consumer grade and…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48090170&quot; title=&quot;You are greatly underestimating the hardware requirements for productive local LLMs. Research consistently shows that parameter count sets the practical ceiling for a model&amp;#39;s reliability. Quantized models with double digit param counts will never be reliable enough to achieve results in the realm of something like Opus 4.6.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these economic hurdles, proponents suggest that current open-weight models already provide sufficient value for most tasks and serve as a strategic &amp;#34;marketing move&amp;#34; by firms like Alibaba and DeepSeek to commoditize the industry &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48088531&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s a very dangerous gamble. Today incredible value is available for nearly everyone. But it may stop without any warning, for reason outside our control. What stops you from running the best open weighted LLMs currently available on consumer grade hardware for the rest of time? They&amp;#39;re good enough for 95% of use cases, and they don&amp;#39;t have a used by date. From what I can see, the &amp;#39;danger&amp;#39; is not having the next tier that comes out, but the impact of that is very low.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48088293&quot; title=&quot;I disagree. I think deepseek, qwen, and kimi earn a lot of trust open sourcing their models. While still profiting. Effectively they are saying &amp;#39;yea don&amp;#39;t crowd our data centers with small queries, go ahead and send your frontier questions to our frontier models. Oh btw those us models? You can run something about as good for free from us if you want hah.&amp;#39; It&amp;#39;s a power and marketing move. It&amp;#39;s also insanely smart to keep up with it to  remain sustainable as a brand. Especially given how small…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tomshardware.com/3d-printing/louis-rossmann-tells-3d-printer-maker-bambu-lab-to-go-bleep-yourself-over-its-lawsuit-against-enthusiast-right-to-repair-advocate-offers-to-pay-the-legal-fees-for-a-threatened-orcaslicer-developer&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Louis Rossmann offers to pay legal fees for a threatened OrcaSlicer developer&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tomshardware.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084432&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;520 points · 281 comments · by iancmceachern&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Right-to-repair advocate Louis Rossmann has pledged $10,000 to cover legal fees for developer Pawel Jarczak after 3D printer manufacturer Bambu Lab issued a cease-and-desist letter over a third-party software project. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tomshardware.com/3d-printing/louis-rossmann-tells-3d-printer-maker-bambu-lab-to-go-bleep-yourself-over-its-lawsuit-against-enthusiast-right-to-repair-advocate-offers-to-pay-the-legal-fees-for-a-threatened-orcaslicer-developer&quot; title=&quot;Louis Rossmann tells 3D printer maker Bambu Lab to ‘Go (Bleep) yourself’ over its threatened lawsuit against enthusiast — Right to Repair advocate offers to pay the legal fees for a threatened OrcaSlicer developer    Bambu Labs controversy heats up.    ![](https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p/?c1=2&amp;amp;c2=10055482&amp;amp;cv=4.4.0&amp;amp;cj=1)    [Skip to main content](#main)    Unlock world-class roadmaps &amp;amp; trusted Bench data.  See More    ×    ## Unparalleled insights. Industry analysis. Insider access.    **Tom&amp;#39;s Hardware**…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on Bambu Lab&amp;#39;s legal threats against a developer for a fork of OrcaSlicer that reportedly interacted with the company&amp;#39;s private cloud APIs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084616&quot; title=&quot;OrcaSlicer supports Bambu printers already. Does anyone have any better sources for what this other fork supposedly did? EDIT: I’m not going to sit through another angry Louis Rossmann video, but from what I can see someone tried to make a branch of OrcaSlicer that interacted directly with Bambu’s private cloud APIs to impersonate Bambu Studio. I don’t agree with the legal threats but this case is about connecting to their non-public cloud APIs, not connecting to the printer directly.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users view Louis Rossmann as an authentic advocate for consumer rights, others dismiss him as a source of &amp;#34;drama and outrage&amp;#34; whose content lacks nuance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084783&quot; title=&quot;Louis is one of the most passionate YouTubers you can watch. I don&amp;#39;t think he gets it right 100% of the time, but when you are that vulnerable (and what appears to be authentic) you&amp;#39;re bound to not make the the right call every once in awhile (as we all do). I support him even though people can pick him apart.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084866&quot; title=&quot;As a matter of fact he&amp;#39;s a never-ending source of drama and outrage, all of which are his own opinions. His repair channel isn&amp;#39;t even about repair anymore, it&amp;#39;s all drama, all the time. I can hardly believe people fall for his shtick anymore.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084898&quot; title=&quot;Yeah I agree, it’s almost a political drama channel at this point and his opinions lack nuance. I don’t understand why an article from Tom’s Hardware about an opinion of Louis Rossman who tells a 3D printer maker to go fuck themselves is currently the most upvoted article on HN.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The community is divided on Bambu Lab itself: some users are abandoning the brand for more open alternatives like Prusa due to privacy and control concerns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084957&quot; title=&quot;I made the tragic mistake of getting a Bambu printer (an X1C, with AMS even...) right before they gave all of us the middle finger. I now have it offline, running out of date firmware, connected to a special WiFi network that is isolated from the Internet. That upset me, but now I&amp;#39;m pissed. Now I don&amp;#39;t even care about their stupid printers. Now I&amp;#39;d like to waste Bambu Lab&amp;#39;s time and cause problems for them. And also, while this X1C should be going strong for years, my eyes are on Prusa should I…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084534&quot; title=&quot;Who are some 3D printer vendors that are worthy of support?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084589&quot; title=&quot;Definitely gives me second thoughts about getting one. They look like easiest way to get into 3d printing as a tool (rather than another hobby), but their recent attitude just makes me think I should suffer a bit less advanced product just to not have to deal with that shit.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, while others argue the printers remain the best &amp;#34;out of the box&amp;#34; tools for those who prioritize printing over tinkering &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084741&quot; title=&quot;You can use Bambu printers fully offline. All this vitriol about them is severely misplaced IMO.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48087037&quot; title=&quot;Meh. I use bambu and I am a maker but it&amp;#39;s not a big thing in my opinion. I bought a bambu precisely because I don&amp;#39;t want to mod the thing with a gazillion custom upgrades like I needed to do with my previous printers to make them work reliably. I just want to press print and... print. Bambu totally delivers there. They really commoditised 3D printing and brought the price down. And if you do want to go off the beaten track they have options. My hobby is not 3D printer tinkering. It&amp;#39;s printing…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085993&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ask HN: What are you working on? (May 2026)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085993&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;164 points · &lt;strong&gt;582 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by david927&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Hacker News community is sharing their current projects and new ideas in the monthly &amp;#34;What are you working on?&amp;#34; discussion thread for May 2026. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085993&quot; title=&quot;What are you working on?  Any new ideas that you&amp;amp;#x27;re thinking about?&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The community is actively developing specialized hardware and software tools, ranging from a &amp;#34;holographic&amp;#34; surf forecast display &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48087292&quot; title=&quot;I’m an application developer by day, but lately Claude Code and Codex have finally made microcontrollers approachable enough for me to start tinkering with them on the side. I built this little “holographic” display that shows the surf forecast for any beach. While my friend built the casing, and mechanical part of it https://x.com/paulnovacovici/status/2041722840190480581?s=46...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt; to a stateless implementation of the RADIUS protocol &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48087356&quot; title=&quot;I’m working on a ground-up implementation of RADIUS with everything running on stateless compute. It’s a beast with many problems to solve but I have EAP-TLS, TTLS and PEAP all working. I’d love to connect with folks interested in this kind of thing.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Fitness is a major theme, with developers building IMU-based sensors for weightlifting precision &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086783&quot; title=&quot;[NO-AI] Being a weightlifter for 20+ years now, I&amp;#39;m working on a barbell speed and path tracking sensor based on newer IMU hardware technologies, which makes it both more precise and cheaper than camera- or actuator-based systems. Ultimately it helps you lift and train safer and better. It&amp;#39;s an intersection of industrial design, hardware, firmware, and software (and some sport science, of course). This intersection is not yet dominated by LLMs so it&amp;#39;s a breath of fresh air. In an early…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; and unified platforms to aggregate data from disparate wearables like Garmin and Polar &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48087260&quot; title=&quot;I do calisthenics 3×/week plus Ironman 70.3 prep, which means my training lives across Garmin, Polar, Withings + FIT files and front-lever sessions that no mainstream app models. So I built one that does both (and have been using for the past 4 years+): logs custom strength moves (front lever, FLAC, ¾ pull-ups), aggregates the connected devices (Polar, Garmin, Suunto, Withings, Apple Health) into one weekly view.  Currently trying to see if can integrate some AI insights to my training…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Creative and productivity projects also feature prominently, including a DSL for drum notation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48089329&quot; title=&quot;* This is my first time actually posting anything on HN. I&amp;#39;ve been making a DSL for writing sheet music specifically for drums as raw text, inspired by ABC Notation (but of course just for drums). Now writing this I noticed that it&amp;#39;s kind of complicated to explain and having a landing page would make my life so much easier. But the gist of it is, you write notation that looks like this: https://gist.github.com/Luigi123/945af7e5cc8dfbfd186f0a99754... and it renders sheet music in PDF, and also…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, a macOS app for project-specific docks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48087657&quot; title=&quot;We&amp;#39;re working on Drawers ( https://drawers.computer ), a macOS app to give each of your projects its own dock, space, and windows. We integrate with macOS spaces to switch out a project-specific dock on each space, containing only the resources you need for that project. We made it possible to add granular resources instead of full apps to the dock (think specific slack channels instead of the whole slack app), to keep the dock hyper focused on what you need. We built this to stay focused while…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, and AI-driven narrative games and puzzles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48088915&quot; title=&quot;I’m continuing to work on my daily puzzle game Tiled Words! https://tiledwords.com Forbes just wrote an article about it which was a fun surprise! [1] It recently turned 6 months old which is wild to me. My wife and I have made a new puzzle every day for half a year! I wrote a blog post about this [2] I recently released user logins. That went well and a lot of people are using them. I also let you filter the backlog by completed puzzles based on player feedback. This week I’m going to start…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086017&quot; title=&quot;Greetings! I&amp;#39;ve been working on something in the vein of a indie game for a little over a year now. It has been a passion project, but I&amp;#39;m starting to come around on showing it to people. I am a big fan of Telltale style narrative games. I think Baldur&amp;#39;s Gate 3 was the biggest revelation of this for me. Taking that branching dialogue and freedom of choice, and tacking it on to a fun combat system was just everything. When text based GTRPGs started popping up, I found it hard to connect with…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/imtomt/ymawky&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Building a web server in assembly to give my life (a lack of) meaning&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48080587&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;397 points · 213 comments · by imtomt&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer has created ymawky, a static file web server for macOS written entirely in ARM64 assembly that supports standard HTTP methods, video streaming via range headers, and directory listing. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/imtomt/ymawky&quot; title=&quot;This is ymawky, a static file web server for MacOS written entirely in ARM64 assembly. It supports GET, PUT, DELETE, HEAD, and OPTIONS requests, and supports Range: bytes=X-Y headers (which allows scrubbing for video streaming). It decodes percent-encoded URLs, strictly enforces docroot, serves custom error pages for any HTTP error response, supports directory listing, and has (some) mitigations against slowloris-like attacks.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;I’ve also written a more detailed writeup here: &amp;lt;a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The project sparked a debate over whether LLMs have devalued low-level &amp;#34;craftsmanship,&amp;#34; with some mourning the death of human artforms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48081430&quot; title=&quot;Ten years ago, I would have kowtowed to someone elite enough to build something like this. Today, I just think, &amp;#39;how long would LLMs have taken to write this?&amp;#39; I mourn the death of a human artform.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48081670&quot; title=&quot;It has always been possible to do it. LLMs are not a particular enabler for that. The difference is that now it is worthless: there is no learning, no person caring about the result, nothing aspirational for the public to look towards... we used to enjoy those challenges, used to be proud of solving complex problems... now? Yeah, whatever, execute execute commit push, let another LLM &amp;#39;review&amp;#39; and call it a day.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; while others argue that AI simply lowers the barrier to entry for practical implementation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48081554&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s far more exciting than sad. Got an idea that you&amp;#39;d need assembly language for - now you can do it instead of..... never doing it because it would have been impossible for you in any practical way. Look to the positive instead of lamenting something that never would have happened. It&amp;#39;s unbelievably exciting that you can now program a computer virtually without the limitation of your ability to hand code it.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48081701&quot; title=&quot;The difference is not that it’s “worthless”. The difference is that now it’s “practical” to implement given the low effort. I wouldn’t be sad about defeating lower complexity challenges. There are always higher complexity challenges that arise once we start operating in a world when you can do more. The bar raises.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users dismiss the feat as &amp;#34;worthless&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;unimpressive&amp;#34; in the age of AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48081670&quot; title=&quot;It has always been possible to do it. LLMs are not a particular enabler for that. The difference is that now it is worthless: there is no learning, no person caring about the result, nothing aspirational for the public to look towards... we used to enjoy those challenges, used to be proud of solving complex problems... now? Yeah, whatever, execute execute commit push, let another LLM &amp;#39;review&amp;#39; and call it a day.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48081572&quot; title=&quot;The result is unimpressive either way -- it&amp;#39;s the journey that is exciting for these kinds of projects&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that deep curiosity and manual struggle remain the only way to gain the expertise necessary to improve upon AI output &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48081398&quot; title=&quot;What a dismissive comment. Now that anyone can have an LLM write code for them, the only people who have value to bring to a project are the ones who can improve upon the LLM&amp;#39;s output. That is, the ones who have a deep enough understanding of the logic and language. And the only people who will ever be in that position are the ones who take the time and effort, out of sheer curiosity, to learn how things work. Whatever your alternative is to this, there is no future in the alternative.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Amidst the philosophical divide, some participants celebrated the project as a return to the &amp;#34;hacker&amp;#34; spirit, finding personal fulfillment in tackling difficult, non-utilitarian challenges &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48081452&quot; title=&quot;I am attempting to write a software renderer in WebAssembly because, for some reason, I feel the need to go against the direction this vibe coded world is going, and I want to feel challenged again. I don&amp;#39;t know if I will ever finish it, it is crazy, and by no means useful. But gosh it feels so good. Congratulations to the OP for the accomplishment.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48081343&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m oddly enthusiastic about seeing someone who beings the HACKER in HackerNews. But at the same time, this made me remember the days when display of skill and craftsmanship were rewarded in the industry. Maybe it&amp;#39;s finally time to move on from being a career programmer.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nesbitt.io/2026/02/03/incident-report-cve-2024-yikes.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Incident Report: CVE-2024-YIKES&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nesbitt.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086082&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;474 points · 116 comments · by miniBill&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A massive supply chain attack involving compromised JavaScript and Rust libraries infected over 4 million developers before being inadvertently neutralized by a cryptocurrency mining worm. The incident, triggered by a phished maintainer, highlights critical vulnerabilities in transitive dependencies and automated build tools across the software ecosystem. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nesbitt.io/2026/02/03/incident-report-cve-2024-yikes.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Incident Report: CVE-2024-YIKES    URL Source: https://nesbitt.io/2026/02/03/incident-report-cve-2024-yikes.html    Published Time: 2026-02-03T03:47:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  **Report filed:** 03:47 UTC    **Status:** Resolved (accidentally)    **Severity:** Critical → Catastrophic → Somehow Fine    **Duration:** 73 hours    **Affected systems:** Yes    **Executive Summary:** A security incident occurred. It has been resolved. We take security seriously. Please see previous 14 incident reports for…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While this incident report is a work of fiction, it highlights real-world anxieties regarding the fragility of software supply chains and the risks posed by obscure transitive dependencies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086588&quot; title=&quot;For anyone confused, this is (very good imo) fiction about supply-chain incidents. It had me very worried during a brief scan that it was real though, which made me read it more attentively :)&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48087417&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Day 1, 14:47 UTC — Among the exfiltrated credentials: the maintainer of vulpine-lz4, a Rust library for “blazingly fast Firefox-themed LZ4 decompression.” The library’s logo is a cartoon fox with sunglasses. It has 12 stars on GitHub but is a transitive dependency of cargo itself. I got a bit curious and here is an incomplete list of crates to compromise to be part of the cargo build and that already have a build.rs so it doesn&amp;#39;t stand out to much: flate2   tar…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters debate whether the solution lies in moving high-value crates into the standard library, increasing funding for audits of core crates, or shifting away from &amp;#34;micro-dependencies&amp;#34; toward larger, consolidated projects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086397&quot; title=&quot;Supply chain incidents suck and we need to do better. Personally for rust I’m a proponent of the foundation supporting a few core crates that go under the same audit procedure as the main rust language and give funding to the project to limit supply chain vulns. I don’t think the right answer is to remove systems like crates or npm. Crate and npm are a boon for many developers.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086534&quot; title=&quot;Move high value crates into the standard library?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086403&quot; title=&quot;Crates has also been making efforts to include rust sec, but in addition to the above I would like the community to shy away from many small dependencies to a few larger ones just as tokio has&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086536&quot; title=&quot;Many small crates published by large, trustworthy projects are fine and preferable to one large crate that &amp;#39;does everything&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a broader concern that the &amp;#34;move fast and break things&amp;#34; mentality, combined with the rise of AI-driven &amp;#34;agentic development,&amp;#34; is creating complex systems that humans no longer fully understand or can effectively secure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086645&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s easy to be cynical because, yes, both the problems and solutions seem dead obvious in hindsight. But for a long time (and maybe even still), a hacker creed was &amp;#39;move fast and break things.&amp;#39; It&amp;#39;s great that there&amp;#39;s so much momentum in fixing the glaring problems with supply chain systems like npm, but I&amp;#39;m concerned that we&amp;#39;re entering a new era of security-related problems caused in large part by agentic development. I&amp;#39;m not just talking about Mythos/Glasswing surfacing vulnerabilities in…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086717&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; But for a long time (and maybe even still), a hacker creed was &amp;#39;move fast and break things.&amp;#39; Was it? I thought Zuckerberg coined this horrible phrase.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086840&quot; title=&quot;He certainly popularized it (maybe coined it), but I&amp;#39;ve seen a lot of organizations and developers repeat that mantra. Even without the specific words, look to product teams debating tradeoffs of going to market vs. waiting for better security controls. They&amp;#39;re pushing for faster product release every time, at pretty much every org.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086995&quot; title=&quot;In any case, not really a hacker&amp;#39;s creed. This has always been withinin the realm of corporations, especially Silicon Valley or adjacent.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085384&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Remind HN: Today is Mother&amp;#39;s Day, call your moms&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085384&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;351 points · 148 comments · by rationalist&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Hacker News post reminds users to call their mothers and wishes a happy Mother&amp;#39;s Day to all mothers in the community. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085384&quot; title=&quot;And for any mothers here, happy Mother&amp;amp;#x27;s Day.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The thread highlights a divide between those who view Mother&amp;#39;s Day as a vital opportunity to honor parents &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085776&quot; title=&quot;Before I got married and had kids I thought it was a dumb Hallmark holiday. Now I think it&amp;#39;s really significant and important to have an official day dedicated to recognize all the moms out there. Happy mother&amp;#39;s day to all the moms out there. And all the guys that made them moms :)&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085886&quot; title=&quot;This is the first year when I can’t do that. Please go do it on my behalf, while it’s possible.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt; and those with strained or abusive relationships who argue that not all mothers deserve recognition &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085727&quot; title=&quot;She despises me for being gay. Not a chance I&amp;#39;m calling her.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085991&quot; title=&quot;Not all moms are good people. People with good moms often have trouble understanding or respecting that.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant confusion exists regarding the holiday&amp;#39;s timing, with users noting that dates vary globally and that the U.S. largely ignores International Women&amp;#39;s Day on March 8th &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085672&quot; title=&quot;How is it mother day isn&amp;#39;t that 8 march&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085670&quot; title=&quot;(in the US)&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085743&quot; title=&quot;March 8 is international women’s day. The most ignored of all holidays by US culture. To an almost hilarious degree. My partner frequently brags that she’s the only of her friends and coworkers, in 10+ years, who has ever gotten flowers for women’s day. Meanwhile even Uber drivers have wished her a happy women’s day in various heavy foreign accents.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085858&quot; title=&quot;Unless you&amp;#39;re in the UK in which case it was the 15th March and you&amp;#39;ve already done it (or already missed it)&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some urge everyone to call their mothers regardless of circumstances &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085786&quot; title=&quot;You should call her&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others counter that cultural differences and personal grievances make such advice complicated &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085727&quot; title=&quot;She despises me for being gay. Not a chance I&amp;#39;m calling her.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086094&quot; title=&quot;Every parent in Asia would despise their son if they were gay. That does not make them bad parents.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2026/05/msg00001.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Debian must ship reproducible packages&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lists.debian.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48081245&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;348 points · 144 comments · by robalni&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Debian Release Team has announced that the &amp;#34;forky&amp;#34; release cycle will now block package migrations that are not reproducible or that regress in reproducibility, while also introducing automated testing for binNMUs and the addition of the loong64 architecture. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2026/05/msg00001.html&quot; title=&quot;bits from the release team    ---    [[Date Prev](msg00000.html)][Date Next]  [[Thread Prev](msg00000.html)][Thread Next]  [[Date Index](maillist.html#00001)]  [[Thread Index](threads.html#00001)]    # bits from the release team    ---    * *To*: debian-devel-announce@lists.debian.org  * *Subject*: bits from the release team  * *From*: Paul Gevers &amp;lt;elbrus@debian.org&amp;gt;  * *Date*: Sun, 10 May 2026 04:47:30 +0000  * *Message-id*:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some celebrate this as a monumental achievement for free software and long-term maintainability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48082436&quot; title=&quot;This is a huge achievement for Debian and the free software world. It took a while though until this was understood. In 2007 when pointing out on debian-devel that this is needed, I was still told what huge waste of time this would be. And indeed it took a huge amount of work by many people to get there, but it is well worth it.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48082833&quot; title=&quot;Reproducible builds are applicable not only to respond to ‘attacks’, a subject you seem to be bikeshedding, but also for other reasons too. Anyone having to maintain a code base or a distributed fleet of devices will gain from this decision, immensely, as their operational periods come and go. Reproducible builds are about longevity as much as they are about security . Please don’t make bold claims about ‘no reason and little benefit’ while demonstrating ignorance of this hard fact:…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48081786&quot; title=&quot;Good thing. NetBSD has fully reproductible build since 2017. https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_fully_reproducible_...&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, critics argue it offers zero improvement to end-user experience and fails to address the more common threat of compromised upstream source code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48081456&quot; title=&quot;zero improvement on end-user experience. does not solve supply chain issues, debian package will reproducabily contain the malware from upstream.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48083538&quot; title=&quot;(Not OP, but...) I still fail to see the current value in confirming that a reproducing builder also included the same compromised dependency that I did when I built it. I understand that reproducible builds are guarding against dynamic attacks within build infrastructure. However I just don&amp;#39;t see those happening. Compromised source dependencies are a 100x more common problem.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Opponents claim the move unnecessarily increases the barrier for contributors without a history of prevented attacks to justify the effort &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48082555&quot; title=&quot;There was no bug or attack on Debian since 2007 that reproducible packages would prevent. &amp;#39;Well worth it&amp;#39; is not correct. And it just ups the the contribution barrier to Debian higher, I already heard a lot of people complaining that contributing to Debian is hard and while in past I defended it by &amp;#39;they need all the checks and bounds to make sure packages play with eachother nicely&amp;#39;, this is just step that makes it hard for no reason and little benefit.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48081894&quot; title=&quot;Has there been a single publicly known attack that would have been prevented by this?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. However, proponents maintain that verifying the link between source and binary is a vital security layer against build infrastructure compromises, citing the XZ Utils backdoor as a relevant example of supply chain risks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48081524&quot; title=&quot;It does not solve all supply chain issues, it do solve some supply chain issues. Not being able to see if the source code shipped is the same as been used for creating the binary is scary&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084062&quot; title=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils_backdoor&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://brennan.io/2026/05/09/pinball-and-escrow/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Space Cadet Pinball on Linux&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (brennan.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48082968&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;327 points · 109 comments · by jandeboevrie&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Linux users can play the classic Windows XP Space Cadet Pinball via a reverse-engineered Flatpak, which also supports high-resolution assets from the original *Full Tilt! Pinball* game data. &lt;a href=&quot;https://brennan.io/2026/05/09/pinball-and-escrow/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Space Cadet Pinball on Linux - Stephen Brennan    URL Source: https://brennan.io/2026/05/09/pinball-and-escrow/    Published Time: Sat, 09 May 2026 20:10:10 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Space Cadet Pinball on Linux • Stephen Brennan    - [x]     *   [Stephen Brennan](https://brennan.io/)  *   [Blog](https://brennan.io/blog)  *   [Projects](https://brennan.io/projects)  *   [Resume](https://brennan.io/resume)    # Space Cadet Pinball on Linux    _Stephen Brennan • 09 May 2026_  To my fellow Linux users who…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The community expressed deep nostalgia for *Space Cadet Pinball*, with one of the original Cinematronics authors even joining the thread to celebrate the game&amp;#39;s longevity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086249&quot; title=&quot;I am one of the original authors of Space Cadet Pinball and I just want to say it is absolutely wonderful there are people who love our old pinball game enough to keep it alive. You made my day. I am forwarding this post to my Cinematronics co-founders and friends, Mike Sandige (lead engineer) and Kevin Gliner (designer and product manager). They will enjoy seeing this as much as I did.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086524&quot; title=&quot;Having a fun game bundled with every Windows install was really something special, so thanks for working on the game and selling it to Microsoft. Without it, we wouldn&amp;#39;t have been able to have a Pinball league in my middle school typing class :) What parts of the game did you work on? Do you have any fun anecdotes about your time working on it, or stories about hard to find bugs?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users prefer other era-specific titles like *Hyper-3D Pinball*, others praised this Linux port&amp;#39;s accuracy despite it being achieved through blind decompilation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084126&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s ridiculous how accurate this recreation is to the original, it looks and feels identical. The author was able to do this just decompiling the exe files, without looking at the original source code. Basically, completely blind. So it goes without saying: The deaf, dumb and blind kid sure makes a mean pinball.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48083366&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m always surprised at the nostalgia for Space Cadet Pinball. Perhaps it was just chance that I grew up playing what seemed like a much better pinball game ( Hyper-3D Pinball, aka Tilt!* ), but I was always underwhelmed by Space Cadet Pinball on windows. In reality they&amp;#39;re both pretty similar, I just happened to play a lot of one before the other, but the full screen DOS experience was much richer than what felt like a much more flat and less 3D windows experience. You can see some Hyper-3D…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussions also touched on the technical difficulty of building a physical version of the table due to impossible geometry &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48083377&quot; title=&quot;Many people have thought about this, IIRC it&amp;#39;s not physically possible to build because there is a lane that goes under a bumper (which in real life they extend down quite a bit) https://files.catbox.moe/pnaeri.png&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48083470&quot; title=&quot;Hm what&amp;#39;s the problem with that? I understand that the bumper extends down, but what else needs to be on the underside that makes this unbuildable?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, and the ongoing challenges of making the project fully stable on non-Windows systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085754&quot; title=&quot;I have struggled to get this project working on non-Windows. It just hangs and crashes no matter what I do or try on Linux/Mac. It&amp;#39;s a very Windows-oriented project that&amp;#39;s slowly losing the shackles right now.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dbushell.com/2026/04/29/github-is-sinking/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GitHub is sinking&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (dbushell.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085095&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;221 points · 146 comments · by herbertl&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Citing declining uptime, AI &amp;#34;slop,&amp;#34; and corporate mismanagement under Microsoft, David Bushell argues that GitHub has become an unreliable liability and urges developers to migrate to alternatives like Codeberg, Forgejo, or self-hosted Git solutions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dbushell.com/2026/04/29/github-is-sinking/&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub is sinking    URL Source: https://dbushell.com/2026/04/29/github-is-sinking/    Published Time: Fri, 08 May 2026 10:54:55 GMT    Markdown Content:  # GitHub is sinking – David Bushell – Web Dev (UK)    ![Image 1](https://dbushell.com/assets/images/dbushell-logotype.svg)    [dbushell.com](https://dbushell.com/)freelance     Menu   # GitHub is sinking    Subscribe[Blog RSS feed](https://dbushell.com/rss.xml)[Notes RSS feed](https://dbushell.com/notes/rss.xml)or[Combined RSS…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on whether GitHub’s instability stems from the Microsoft acquisition or a massive influx of AI-generated code that has overwhelmed infrastructure like CI and Actions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085542&quot; title=&quot;Everyone wants to pin this on the Microsoft acquisition or incompetence but it seems pretty clear to me from the material  GitHub has posted that AI has 10xed the amount of code being committed to GH, which has downstream effects everywhere - CI, Actions, code ingestion, everywhere. The author pins it on weird things like MS Copilot, which kind of feels like he’s listing off things he doesn’t like rather than casual favors. This is ignoring the 800 pound gorilla in the room.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085602&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, I had the exact same response after reading the post. I mean, I&amp;#39;m all for jumping on the Microsoft hate train, but not if it misses the elephant in the room. Let&amp;#39;s say the _perfect_ GitHub replacement spawns tomorrow? What&amp;#39;s preventing the same infrastructure challenges of millions of lines of AI-generated code destroying it? I think centralized code hosting is pretty much going to get killed by AI. Just like it&amp;#39;s doing to social media.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that centralized hosting is being &amp;#34;killed&amp;#34; by this volume of automated content &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085602&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, I had the exact same response after reading the post. I mean, I&amp;#39;m all for jumping on the Microsoft hate train, but not if it misses the elephant in the room. Let&amp;#39;s say the _perfect_ GitHub replacement spawns tomorrow? What&amp;#39;s preventing the same infrastructure challenges of millions of lines of AI-generated code destroying it? I think centralized code hosting is pretty much going to get killed by AI. Just like it&amp;#39;s doing to social media.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085813&quot; title=&quot;Because it&amp;#39;s centralized . Your project pays the price for every unrelated project that&amp;#39;s getting overloaded.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085658&quot; title=&quot;of all the awful things AI is doing and will be doing to society, killing centralized code hosting and social media will be its shinniest moments, both deserve to die painful deaths&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that GitHub’s uptime issues predated the LLM boom &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086312&quot; title=&quot;The graph in TFA shows the downtime pattern starting in January 2020. OpenAI released GPT-3.5 in November 2022 (basically December), and LLM/agentic coding didn’t really kick off in the way you’re describing until 2024, but really in 2025. How can that explain the terrible uptime for the ~4 years post acquisition before all the AI stuff you’re talking about started?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt; and that historical downtime data may be inaccurate &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086786&quot; title=&quot;The graph is not accurate, because GitHub&amp;#39;s historical downtime data is not accurate. For example, here is a Hacker News story about GitHub being down on July 28th 2016: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12178449 Here&amp;#39;s GitHub&amp;#39;s historical uptime graph (on which this chart is based), saying there was no recorded downtime that day, or in fact that entire month: https://www.githubstatus.com/uptime?page=40&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these &amp;#34;growth pains,&amp;#34; some users believe GitHub will remain essential as a collaboration hub for AI-driven development once it scales to meet the new demand &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085769&quot; title=&quot;Why is centralized code hosting getting killed? I&amp;#39;m running an opensource project, &amp;gt;99% of the code is AI generated, could not do this without GitHub. Ai generated source code needs a place where AIs and people can collaborate. I&amp;#39;m expecting GitHub to be hugely successful, but mostly for an AI audience.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085946&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m sure the underlying infra is not a single server, so this is mostly a period where they have to adapt to higher loads due to AI becoming actually useable in the last 8 months. It&amp;#39;s basically proof how well AI works these days. Give it a few months so they can scale and it&amp;#39;ll get better. Remember Twitter fail whale? Growth pains that can and will be solved.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://e360.yale.edu/features/amoc-climate-change&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Scientists warn Atlantic current at risk of shutting down&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (e360.yale.edu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084836&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;159 points · &lt;strong&gt;206 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by ambigious7777&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scientists warn that the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is weakening and may approach a catastrophic tipping point this century, potentially disrupting global weather patterns and plunging Europe into significantly colder, drier conditions as climate change alters ocean density and salinity. &lt;a href=&quot;https://e360.yale.edu/features/amoc-climate-change&quot; title=&quot;Title: Why Fears Are Growing Over the Fate of a Key Atlantic Current    URL Source: https://e360.yale.edu/features/amoc-climate-change    Markdown Content:  # Why Fears Are Growing Over the Fate of a Key Atlantic Current - Yale E360    Close    ![Image 1](https://e360.yale.edu/features/amoc-climate-change)    /    [←](https://e360.yale.edu/features/amoc-climate-change#)[→](https://e360.yale.edu/features/amoc-climate-change#)    Search Search    # [Yale Environment 360](https://e360.yale.edu/)    ## Published at…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the tension between alarming climate modeling and public perception, with some arguing that catastrophic headlines foster hopelessness or skepticism when predicted disasters do not immediately materialize &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085133&quot; title=&quot;I think climate change is a compelling crisis but I find these types of “could maybe happen according to some models” type of catastrophic scenarios a little frustrating because they soak up a lot of attention with scary headlines, reinforcing hopelessness in those who care while providing ammunition to skeptics when the catastrophe doesn’t materialize. It’s also easy to question methodology for anyone who has done academic modeling and knows how easy it is to get the result you want. Much…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085259&quot; title=&quot;Which the average person doesn’t know because this is the 50th headline they’ve read on how we’re screwed today that hasn’t happened. They’ve blown their attention budget for the layman and aren’t getting it back unless someone serious guides their attention.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users contend that climate shifts occur too slowly to be noticeable in short intervals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085024&quot; title=&quot;Climate also doesn&amp;#39;t change in macro over a lifetime. It&amp;#39;s very real, but the notion that it&amp;#39;s changing over a 5 year period is nonsense. things aren&amp;#39;t &amp;#39;shutting off&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that gradual changes predicted decades ago are already manifesting as measurable environmental and economic impacts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085302&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; the 50th headline they’ve read on how we’re screwed today that hasn’t happened the things are happening though. e.g. if you read a headline in the 70s that said something like &amp;#39;ski seasons will shorten by an average of 1 day per year, leading to only 5 inches of snow water equivalent in Colorado resorts by 2026, and eliminating the economic viability of skiing in the northeast by 2060&amp;#39; that would have been completely correct.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085247&quot; title=&quot;two absolute facts: 1. even if there was something humans could do about it, we won&amp;#39;t, ever 2. insurance rates are the only &amp;#39;control&amp;#39;. they will skyrocket and thereby the only change to select behavior human society allows &amp;#39;privatize the profits, socialize the costs&amp;#39; so that scales from the smallest to the largest models&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant disagreement over the role of scientists, with debates on whether they should present findings as neutral data or urgent warnings, and whether human intervention is even possible given current economic structures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084993&quot; title=&quot;Hot take on HN, but techno-optimism sounds so stupid when it comes to climate change... You can&amp;#39;t engineer macro climate/ecology, since capital has no interest in human and it&amp;#39;s surrounding environment balanced cohabitation.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085176&quot; title=&quot;What, exactly, do you expect scientists researching these things to do? Bury their findings?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085232&quot; title=&quot;I suppose they could refrain from injecting their feelings into it. The science doesn&amp;#39;t change if it is presented as simple information and not as a warning.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://g5t.de/articles/20260510-task-paralysis-and-ai/index.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Task Paralysis and AI&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (g5t.de)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48081469&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;221 points · 111 comments · by MrGilbert&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author explores how AI tools like Claude help him overcome task paralysis and executive dysfunction in coding, while warning of the potential for financial addiction driven by the rapid dopamine hits of instant results. &lt;a href=&quot;https://g5t.de/articles/20260510-task-paralysis-and-ai/index.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Task Paralysis &amp;amp; AI | g5t.de    URL Source: https://g5t.de/articles/20260510-task-paralysis-and-ai/index.html    Published Time: Sun, 10 May 2026 11:18:02 GMT    Markdown Content:  Sun May 10 2026 | Last updated:Sun May 10 2026| by Daniel Gilbert   #### About Task Paralysis    Straight away: I am not diagnosed yet. So I&amp;#39;m hesitant to say &amp;#39;I have ADHD&amp;#39;, because the truth is: I don&amp;#39;t know it. There are signs: My siblings have been diagnosed as kids, and I&amp;#39;m personally struggling with tasks that…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide between those who see AI as a tool for overcoming &amp;#34;initialization energy&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48083301&quot; title=&quot;Nitpick: Stop the throat clearing and get to the point. The final paragraph is the whole point of the article. It&amp;#39;s a real turnoff when I have to scroll past a moral lecture on artistry and piracy when I just want to hear your thoughts on task paralysis. --- To the author&amp;#39;s point though, AI is incredible at building some initial momentum on a task. The initialization energy is basically zero.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt; and those who find it creates a &amp;#34;dopamine trap&amp;#34; that exacerbates ADHD and task paralysis &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48082606&quot; title=&quot;I could have written this article myself. The addiction part, the ADHD part and the pending test part. The fear of becoming addicted to AI is real and I don&amp;#39;t think I&amp;#39;ll be capable to stop it, considering we&amp;#39;re asking people who struggle with avoiding quick dopamine to use it professionally in their daily work life. My Pro went to Max(5) to Max(20) pretty quickly and I was burning through that weekly limit still, without large agentic workflows that burn tokens. Just me and 4-5 terminals.…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48083067&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; [...] considering we&amp;#39;re asking people who struggle with avoiding quick dopamine to use it professionally in their daily work life. It&amp;#39;s so wild that it never dawned on me, why some people around me were so quick with &amp;#39;Let AI do that!&amp;#39;. I&amp;#39;m  not saying that each and everyone has ADHD, but I think I underestimated a) the flow of dopamine a successful prompt can set free and b) the craving for it by folks that I deemed more stable than myself.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Many developers report a loss of &amp;#34;intrinsic reward,&amp;#34; feeling that AI replaces the satisfying puzzle-solving aspects of coding with the frustrating, often inconsistent task of managing &amp;#34;fleets of agents&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48083162&quot; title=&quot;I do have an actual diagnostic and I had the same experience over the past year with early coding harness at the beginning of the year, then Claude code since its release date. But after 1+year going that direction I really don’t want to continue. The novelty is gone, dealing with AI now feels frustrating and boring, I miss engaging deeply with the actual lower level technical challenges. I do not want to manage fleets of agents. I do not want to rediscover for the hundredth time that in fact…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084101&quot; title=&quot;I have done a lot of introspection on this and realized that I&amp;#39;m very much driven by intrinsic rewards moreso than extrinsic. I got into coding over a decade before it was my career because of the exploration, learning, and puzzle/challenge aspect. Every time I have tried to be extrinsically driven (career or OSS wise) it&amp;#39;s never worked out anyway. I could have done more to make it successful but I never cared about getting validation or getting users for my stuff (and the stress that brings).…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that AI output is no more of a gamble than hiring human employees &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48082855&quot; title=&quot;The gambling trope is so tired. AI development doesn&amp;#39;t involve luck to any appreciable degree, certainly not more than hiring people to do a job can be considered &amp;#39;gambling&amp;#39; (you never know what you&amp;#39;re going to get!). It&amp;#39;s just paying to get stuff done, which is how it&amp;#39;s always been, since the dawn of man.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the need for repetitive prompting to fix errors introduces a significant element of luck and unpredictability into the workflow &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48083420&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;AI development doesn&amp;#39;t involve luck to any appreciable degree Reading this while I&amp;#39;m prompting for the third time to fix a 100+ line function is amusing, to say the least. I don&amp;#39;t care about the definition of &amp;#39;appreciable&amp;#39;, but I definitely have to repeat myself to get stuff done, sometimes even to undo things I never told it to touch.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48083435&quot; title=&quot;That sounds like a process problem. LLMs, like any tool, work better if you don&amp;#39;t use them in the naive &amp;#39;do this&amp;#39; way. This works well for me: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48083267&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ycombinator.fyi/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;YC&amp;#39;s Biggest Scandals&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ycombinator.fyi)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085314&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;245 points · 85 comments · by laserduck&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The unofficial YC record documents a history of scandals, including $23 billion in &amp;#34;incinerated&amp;#34; capital, instances of fraud like uBiome’s $300 million insurance scam, and recent controversies involving &amp;#34;copycat&amp;#34; startups, fabricated audit reports, and AI surveillance software. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ycombinator.fyi/&quot; title=&quot;Title: YCOMBINATOR.FYI — The Unofficial YC Record    URL Source: https://ycombinator.fyi/    Markdown Content:  # YCOMBINATOR.FYI — The Unofficial YC Record    [ycombinator.fyi](https://ycombinator.fyi/)/[Timeline](https://ycombinator.fyi/timeline)[RFS](https://ycombinator.fyi/rfs)[GStack](https://ycombinator.fyi/gstack)    [@NotOnKetamine](https://x.com/NotOnKetamine)    (OFFICIAL ARCHIVE)    # YCOMBINATOR.FYI    Not Backed by Combinator    $23.0B    Capital Incinerated    39    Exhibits Filed    16    Fraud &amp;amp;…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Critics argue that Y Combinator has become &amp;#34;rotten to the core&amp;#34; by funding &amp;#34;dystopian&amp;#34; companies like 9 Mothers, which some believe could easily pivot from drone defense to offensive &amp;#34;slaughterbots&amp;#34; used against civilians &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48087529&quot; title=&quot;As an alum from the ancient days I take issue with many of the companies that YC funds these days. Flock? 9 Mothers? This shit is dystopian and I hate that I’m somehow even tangentially associated with it.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48087847&quot; title=&quot;Probably the worry that the jump from &amp;#39;we defend against slaughterbots&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;we built a better slaughterbot&amp;#39; is just around the corner&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48088313&quot; title=&quot;That means 18 year olds will get splattered. I&amp;#39;m not for that. The kids who die in the military are just kids, regardless of their job. They aren&amp;#39;t personally responsible for the shit orders they get. The problem is that anything made for defense is almost inherently useful for offense, and the US is not the most trustworthy government right now. It&amp;#39;s, sadly, not inconceivable that an automatic turret mounted shotgun could be put to use against human people across the globe, or even human…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48087357&quot; title=&quot;While I agree that YC appears rotten to the core at this point, it’s almost impossible to sustain a criticism of the accelerator because they make so many little investments. No matter what you accuse them of, they’ll dismiss it by saying you’re cherry-picking. I have to admit, it’s a brilliant strategy to avoid any kind of accountability.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others contend that defending against drones is ethical and that the list of &amp;#34;scandals&amp;#34; is underwhelming, as it catalogs only 39 failures out of over 5,000 investments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48087620&quot; title=&quot;9 mothers appears to do defense from drones which seems completely ethical. What is dystopian about that?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48087618&quot; title=&quot;YC has funded over 5000 companies, and this page catalogs 39 that failed, many of which, on the sites own terms, are simply business failures, with no additional drama. I don&amp;#39;t think the authors of the site realize the case they&amp;#39;re actually making here.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also touches on the site&amp;#39;s presentation, with some finding the LLM-designed format pompous and obnoxious while others appreciate the aesthetic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48087168&quot; title=&quot;LLM-designed sites like this are always so pompous. The obnoxious format does a disservice to what you’re trying to present.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48087185&quot; title=&quot;fwiw - i think the design looks good.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jola.dev/posts/running-local-models-on-m4&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Running local models on an M4 with 24GB memory&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jola.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48089091&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;229 points · 77 comments · by shintoist&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author details a successful setup for running local AI models on a 24GB M4 MacBook Pro, identifying Qwen 3.5-9B as the best performer for coding and tool use despite its limitations compared to state-of-the-art cloud models. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jola.dev/posts/running-local-models-on-m4&quot; title=&quot;Title: Running local models on an M4 with 24GB memory    URL Source: https://jola.dev/posts/running-local-models-on-m4    Published Time: 2026-05-10    Markdown Content:  I’ve been experimenting with running local models on and off for a bit and I’ve finally found a setup that seems to work reasonably. It’s nothing like the output of a SOTA model, but the excitement of being able to have a local model do basic tasks, research, and planning, more than makes up for it! No internet connection required!…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users report that while running local models like Qwen 9B or Gemma 31B on M4 hardware is increasingly viable for small tasks like fixing lint errors, these models still struggle with non-trivial reasoning and frequently hallucinate project details &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48089940&quot; title=&quot;I could have used this article before I spent the weekend arriving to the same conclusion! Same laptop, and my contrived test was having it fix 50 or so lint errors in a small vibe-coded C++ repo. I wanted it to be able to handle a bunch of small tasks without getting stuck too often. GPT OSS 20B was usable but slow, and actually frequently made mistakes like adding or duplicating statements unnecessarily, listing things as fixed without editing the code, and so on. Qwen 3.5 9B with Opencode…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48089489&quot; title=&quot;I am running qwen 3.6 9b quantized model on my m4 pro 48gb and it is barely useful to do some basic pi.dev/cc driven development. I think 128gb desktops are the sweet setup to actually get meaningful work done. However, getting your hands on one of these machines is difficult at the moment. As much fun as it is to run these things locally don’t forget that your time is not free. I am slowly migrating my use cases to openrouter and run the largest qwen model for &amp;lt; $2-3/day with serious use for…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48089715&quot; title=&quot;Getting so close to good! I consider Gemma 4 31B (dense / no MoE), the new baseline for local models. It&amp;#39;s obviously worse than the frontier models, but it feels less like a science experiment than any previous local model I’ve run, including GPT OSS 120B and Nemotron Super 120B. On my M5 Max with 128 GB of RAM and the full 256K context window, I see RAM use spike to about 70 GB, with something like 14 GB of system overhead. A 64 GB Panther Lake machine with the full Arc B390, or a 48 GB…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong consensus that local LLMs are not yet comparable to frontier models, with some arguing that the high cost of high-memory hardware (up to $7,000 for 128GB) makes cloud subscriptions more economically sensible unless privacy is the primary concern &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48089658&quot; title=&quot;A 128GiB MacBook Pro in Canada is what, north of CAD $11k after tax? That’s around USD $7k. At $20/month for a cloud AI subscription, you’re looking at almost 30 years of service for the same money. How long do people realistically expect a laptop to stay competitive with SOTA local models? Especially in a space where model sizes, context windows, and inference requirements keep moving every year. And even if the hardware lasts, the local experience usually doesn’t. A heavily quantized local…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48090052&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It is absolutely not comparable to frontier models. This is not said often enough. Yes, local LLMs are great! But reading most HN posts on the subject, you&amp;#39;d think they&amp;#39;re within reach of Opus 4.7. There is a very small, very vocal, very passionate crowd that dramatically overstates the capabilities of local LLMs on HN.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While 24GB of RAM is often cited as slightly insufficient for a smooth coding experience, users suggest that 32GB to 128GB is the &amp;#34;sweet spot&amp;#34; for running more capable quantized models effectively &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48089489&quot; title=&quot;I am running qwen 3.6 9b quantized model on my m4 pro 48gb and it is barely useful to do some basic pi.dev/cc driven development. I think 128gb desktops are the sweet setup to actually get meaningful work done. However, getting your hands on one of these machines is difficult at the moment. As much fun as it is to run these things locally don’t forget that your time is not free. I am slowly migrating my use cases to openrouter and run the largest qwen model for &amp;lt; $2-3/day with serious use for…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48089449&quot; title=&quot;Recent models (Qwen 3.6 and Gemma) can really do coding locally. Feels like SOTA from maybe a year ago? But you would want about 32-40GB total memory. 24GB is just a bit short of that. A gaming PC with 16GB graphics card and 32GB RAM brings you very close to a usable coding system.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48089715&quot; title=&quot;Getting so close to good! I consider Gemma 4 31B (dense / no MoE), the new baseline for local models. It&amp;#39;s obviously worse than the frontier models, but it feels less like a science experiment than any previous local model I’ve run, including GPT OSS 120B and Nemotron Super 120B. On my M5 Max with 128 GB of RAM and the full 256K context window, I see RAM use spike to about 70 GB, with something like 14 GB of system overhead. A 64 GB Panther Lake machine with the full Arc B390, or a 48 GB…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://janrosenow.substack.com/p/spain-just-became-one-of-europes&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Spain has become one of Europe’s cheapest power markets&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (janrosenow.substack.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085330&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;158 points · 128 comments · by marc__1&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Spain has emerged as one of Europe’s cheapest power markets by aggressively replacing fossil fuels with wind and solar, which now generate 44% of its electricity and have significantly decoupled wholesale prices from the volatile natural gas market. &lt;a href=&quot;https://janrosenow.substack.com/p/spain-just-became-one-of-europes&quot; title=&quot;Spain just became one of Europe&amp;#39;s cheapest power markets. Here is how.    How wind and solar quietly pushed gas off the margin, and the wholesale price followed.    [![Bright Spots](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!RBSA!,w_40,h_40,c_fill,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fe623764b-2e91-4f1d-9ad0-c6b0f3f81daf_1000x1000.png)](/)    # [Bright Spots](/)    SubscribeSign in    # Spain just became one of Europe&amp;#39;s cheapest power…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Spain’s low electricity prices are attributed to a favorable renewable mix of solar and wind &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086346&quot; title=&quot;The past few years has also had Solar continuing to decrease in price so its increasingly going to be the primary choice. On top of that battery prices have been plummeting too so that now Solar + battery is cheaper than other options like Nuclear and especially Gas. Most of the EU will be running on Wind and Solar in the coming years, its a change that is now rapidly occuring based entirely on the rare economics. Solar and Wind are half the price of anything else.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086378&quot; title=&quot;Not most of EU but geographically large and diverse and low-latitude countries will. Spain has winds from three different sea areas and is known sunny, so they are in a good position.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, though some argue this is primarily due to limited grid interconnections that prevent price equalization with more expensive neighbors like Germany &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086727&quot; title=&quot;The author&amp;#39;s point is that Spain&amp;#39;s electricity is very cheap compared to other European countries thanks to its great electricity mix, etc. The reality is that Spain&amp;#39;s electricity is cheap because it is relatively insulated from Europe&amp;#39;s core network, because its interconnections with other countries are limited. In financial words, there is a spread with the rest of Europe because the ways to arbitrage that spread are extremely limited. If Spain was located near Germany and well…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086879&quot; title=&quot;This is a lesson in how electricity isn&amp;#39;t really a commodity e.g. it&amp;#39;s very very difficult to send some electrons from one side of the world to another.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While proponents highlight that solar and battery storage are now significantly cheaper than nuclear or gas &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086346&quot; title=&quot;The past few years has also had Solar continuing to decrease in price so its increasingly going to be the primary choice. On top of that battery prices have been plummeting too so that now Solar + battery is cheaper than other options like Nuclear and especially Gas. Most of the EU will be running on Wind and Solar in the coming years, its a change that is now rapidly occuring based entirely on the rare economics. Solar and Wind are half the price of anything else.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086434&quot; title=&quot;1/5th the price of nuclear. Probably when combined with batteries it is half the price. There are some colder areas in northern europe especially where solar doesnt work as well but they also tend to be better served for hydro (which can also store power).&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, critics warn that over-reliance on renewables has caused grid instability and forced the shutdown of reliable nuclear plants &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086119&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Damian Cortinas, chair of ENTSO-E’s board, told the Financial Times that “the issue is not about renewables” but about the grid’s ability to manage “fast voltage variations” that can destabilise the system. Unusual oscillations triggered a cascade of plant disconnections, and grid managers lost control. The real lesson is not that Spain has gone too far on wind and solar, YES THEY DID, they went as far as making nuclear power plants shut down due to negative prices so their reliable stable…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant debate remains regarding the feasibility of scaling battery storage to cover long-term weather lulls &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086601&quot; title=&quot;How much would it cost to build out batteries which cover entire continent&amp;#39;s electricy needs for say three weeks (as there can be 2-3 week lulls of no wind and no sun in Europe in the winter)?  Cause that sounds like a lot of batteries. Not to mention, if a freak 4 week lull occurs, we&amp;#39;ll go back to Middle Ages for a week.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt; and why some countries with similar resource profiles fail to achieve comparable price drops &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086598&quot; title=&quot;Well that&amp;#39; doesn&amp;#39;t always scan. Austria has a lot of wind, sun and hydro so its energy prices should be in line with Sweden, Norway, Denmark amongst the cheapest in Europe, and yet it&amp;#39;s routinely amongst the more expensive in the EU.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mathoverflow.net/questions/43690/whats-a-mathematician-to-do&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What&amp;#39;s a mathematician to do? (2010)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mathoverflow.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48083007&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;162 points · 78 comments · by ipnon&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On MathOverflow, prominent mathematicians addressed an undergraduate&amp;#39;s concerns about personal contribution by explaining that mathematics is a collaborative community effort focused on clarity, teaching, and organizing knowledge rather than just individual genius or breakthrough theorems. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mathoverflow.net/questions/43690/whats-a-mathematician-to-do&quot; title=&quot;Title: What&amp;#39;s a mathematician to do?    URL Source: https://mathoverflow.net/questions/43690/whats-a-mathematician-to-do    Markdown Content:  # career - What&amp;#39;s a mathematician to do? - MathOverflow    # ![Image 1: site logo](https://mathoverflow.net/Content/Sites/mathoverflow/Img/icon-48.png?v=6c004a7b4d5d)    By clicking “Sign up”, you agree to our [terms of service](https://mathoverflow.net/legal/terms-of-service/public) and acknowledge you have read our [privacy…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The role of a mathematician is increasingly seen as one of cultural maintenance and pedagogy, where the act of learning, sharing, and translating complex ideas into modern notation is considered a vital contribution to keeping civilization afloat &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084067&quot; title=&quot;From one of the answers: &amp;gt; mathematics only exists in a living community of mathematicians that spreads understanding and breaths life into ideas both old and new. The real satisfaction from mathematics is in learning from others and sharing with others. All of us have clear understanding of a few things and murky concepts of many more. There is no way to run out of ideas in need of clarification. Yes! And this applies to all human culture, not just math. Everything people have figured out…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085142&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; One can rewrite their books in modern language and notation or guide others to learn it too but I never believed this was the significant part of a mathematician work There&amp;#39;s yer problem right there.  Good pedagogy is hard and highly undervalued.  IMHO Grant Sanderson (a.k.a. 3blue1brown) is making some of the most significant contributions to math in all of human history by making very complex topics accessible to ordinary mortals.  In so doing he addresses one of the most significant…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that math is best learned in service of practical goals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084275&quot; title=&quot;So I&amp;#39;ve got a gut feeling that math (like human languages (like programming languages)) is best learned in service of some greater end. I look at some truly impressive projects like CLASP which sprang into existence not because of someone noodling around, but because they had a bigger goal which required the team build it. So my advice to any mathematician who feels lost, like they don&amp;#39;t know what to work on, would be to go collaborate with someone who has an actual goal, to look for…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the most useful discoveries often arise from pursuing math for its own sake &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084389&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a delightful counterintuition that your gut feeling is mostly wrong: https://webhomes.maths.ed.ac.uk/~v1ranick/papers/wigner.pdf Far from being motivated by some applications, the most useful discoveries in mathematics are usually discovered &amp;#39;for their own sake&amp;#39; and their application is only discovered later. Sometimes centuries later!&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. As AI begins to reach PhD-level proficiency in proof-writing, mathematicians may pivot toward curating valuable problems and providing oversight, much like chess masters in the post-computer era &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48083942&quot; title=&quot;After reading another post about the most recent advances LLMs have made in finding and writing up novel, correct proofs, it sounds like the frontier models are now at the point of PhD student level. I wonder how a math student could contribute today, if they&amp;#39;re just starting on the PhD track? Maybe by using LLMs as a mighty tool and providing skilled usage and oversight? It must feel similar to those who wanted to become chess or go masters after computers surpassed humanity in those games.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48083981&quot; title=&quot;I wonder if AI is one means to overcome the natural limits of human knowledge aggregation [0]. On the other hand, in the very long run, what does it mean if a talented human being does not have enough years of life to fully analyze and understand an extremely advanced proof created by AI? [0]: https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/11/09/ars-longa-vita-brevis/&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cyber.netsecops.io/articles/obsidian-plugin-abused-in-campaign-to-deploy-phantom-pulse-rat/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Obsidian plugin was abused to deploy a remote access trojan&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cyber.netsecops.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48088576&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;151 points · 73 comments · by cmbailey&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Security researchers discovered a social engineering campaign targeting financial and cryptocurrency professionals by using malicious Obsidian plugins to deploy &amp;#34;PHANTOMPULSE,&amp;#34; a new cross-platform remote access trojan that uses the Ethereum blockchain to resolve its command-and-control server. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cyber.netsecops.io/articles/obsidian-plugin-abused-in-campaign-to-deploy-phantom-pulse-rat/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Obsidian Plugin Abused in Social Engineering Campaign to Deliver New PHANTOMPULSE RAT    URL Source: https://cyber.netsecops.io/articles/obsidian-plugin-abused-in-campaign-to-deploy-phantom-pulse-rat/    Published Time: 2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  ## Executive Summary    Security researchers have identified a highly targeted social engineering campaign (REF6598) that weaponizes the **[Obsidian](https://obsidian.md/)** note-taking application to deliver a previously undocumented…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether this incident is a failure of software architecture or a successful social engineering attack, as the exploit requires users to manually bypass multiple safety warnings and sync settings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48088793&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The victim is prompted to enable the &amp;#39;Installed community plugins&amp;#39; synchronization feature. Obsidian has the proper protections in place to prevent this type of attack, and the victims are being convinced to ignore them. This is just a successful social engineering event. I hate to see Obsidian dragged down by this headline, since this attack is not exploiting a vulnerability in it or its plugin system.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48090255&quot; title=&quot;Obsidian CEO here. There is a major update coming soon for plugin security. I think it will address many of the concerns people have raised in this thread. It&amp;#39;s a hard problem but we are working on it. That said, the headline is misleading. This article is about a social engineering attack that requires the user to actively reject multiple safety warnings in Obsidian. As far as I know this is a proof of concept, I haven&amp;#39;t seen any reports of users being affected by this attack.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48089286&quot; title=&quot;The attack here requires not just enabling community plugins, but also syncing the attacker&amp;#39;s vault to your computer, and also separately enabling the synchronization of the attacker&amp;#39;s plugins with yours.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that Obsidian’s lack of plugin sandboxing is &amp;#34;inexcusably negligent&amp;#34; because plugins inherit full system access, making the platform inherently unsafe for enterprise use &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48089092&quot; title=&quot;Ehm. No? https://obsidian.md/help/plugin-security#Plugin+capabilities &amp;gt; Due to technical limitations, Obsidian cannot reliably restrict plugins to specific permissions or access levels. This means that plugins will inherit Obsidian&amp;#39;s access levels. As a result, consider the following examples of what community plugins can do: Community plugins can access files on your computer.      Community plugins can connect to internet.      Community plugins can install additional programs. Obsidian has no…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48089334&quot; title=&quot;This is just the first detected and reported instance, in all likelyhood such attacks have been happening for some time. When will the fanatic userbsse finally admit that using Obsidian in any enterprise setting is just plain malpractice? It takes 5 minutes in their Discord channel to see the founders are D&amp;amp;D nerds, not competent engineers. It was never meant for serious work.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48089793&quot; title=&quot;Yes, in this specific case . Obsidian Plugins are still incredibly vulnerable. A compromised plugin will essentially take over your machine. There&amp;#39;s no sandboxing of any kind. It&amp;#39;s even more insecure than browser extensions (that could steal your auth tokens, but at least don&amp;#39;t have unfettered access to your filesystem). This is really unfortunate. I love Obsidian and am a paid subscriber for many years, but the community plugins needs a security overhaul asap, before someone gets hurt.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users maintain that the software is unusable without these community extensions, the CEO noted that a major security update is forthcoming to address these structural vulnerabilities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48089256&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s horse hockey. Obsidian is not a usable system without community plugins. Folks will reply &amp;#39;but I use it every day without plugins&amp;#39;. That position disregards software usability as a formal discipline, along with decades of UX research and standards.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48090255&quot; title=&quot;Obsidian CEO here. There is a major update coming soon for plugin security. I think it will address many of the concerns people have raised in this thread. It&amp;#39;s a hard problem but we are working on it. That said, the headline is misleading. This article is about a social engineering attack that requires the user to actively reject multiple safety warnings in Obsidian. As far as I know this is a proof of concept, I haven&amp;#39;t seen any reports of users being affected by this attack.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48089793&quot; title=&quot;Yes, in this specific case . Obsidian Plugins are still incredibly vulnerable. A compromised plugin will essentially take over your machine. There&amp;#39;s no sandboxing of any kind. It&amp;#39;s even more insecure than browser extensions (that could steal your auth tokens, but at least don&amp;#39;t have unfettered access to your filesystem). This is really unfortunate. I love Obsidian and am a paid subscriber for many years, but the community plugins needs a security overhaul asap, before someone gets hurt.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://allendowney.github.io/ThinkLinearAlgebra/index.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Think Linear Algebra (2023)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (allendowney.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48082396&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;192 points · 24 comments · by tamnd&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*Think Linear Algebra* is a code-first, open-source textbook by Allen Downey that uses Python and Jupyter notebooks to teach linear algebra through real-world applications like GPS tracking, electrical circuits, and computer graphics. &lt;a href=&quot;https://allendowney.github.io/ThinkLinearAlgebra/index.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Think Linear Algebra — Think Linear Algebra    URL Source: https://allendowney.github.io/ThinkLinearAlgebra/index.html    Published Time: Sun, 25 Jan 2026 01:31:29 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Think Linear Algebra — Think Linear Algebra    [Skip to main content](https://allendowney.github.io/ThinkLinearAlgebra/index.html#main-content)    Back to top- [x] - [x]     Ctrl+K    [Think Linear Algebra](https://allendowney.github.io/ThinkLinearAlgebra/index.html#)    *   [Think Linear…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights Allen Downey’s prolific and generous contributions to open-source education, with users praising his &amp;#34;Think&amp;#34; series for being clearer and more practical than traditional textbooks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085268&quot; title=&quot;Allen Downey (author of the above) has a number of books on computer science-y things. You can buy hardcopies but I think all of them are also just freely available. Here&amp;#39;s a few: Think Complexity https://github.com/AllenDowney/ThinkComplexity2 Think DSP https://github.com/AllenDowney/ThinkDSP Think Stats https://github.com/AllenDowney/ThinkStats/ Think Bayes https://github.com/AllenDowney/ThinkBayes2/&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48087465&quot; title=&quot;BTW, if Allen Downey is reads this, I just want to send some love. I saw the beginning of the Internet. Everybody was full of dreams of the free flow of information and shareable knowledge, which greatest representation was executable code. Now, when we are surrounded by walled gardens and evil billionaires, Allen is always sharing his knowledge for all the world. Thank you.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48090248&quot; title=&quot;Also: - Think Python - Think Data Structures - Think Java - Think Perl6 (!) - Modeling and Simulation in Python - Probably Overthinking It And more [1]. He&amp;#39;s a prolific writer, and very generous for offering many of them for free. I read several of them online or through O&amp;#39;Reilly, and bought printed copies just to appreciate his work. Really enjoyed Think DSP, Think Complexity, Think Bayes, etc. [1] https://www.amazon.com/stores/Allen-Downey/author/B001O8NBPS&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48087979&quot; title=&quot;Seconded, not only is Downey quite generous, his books are every bit as good, if not better, than expensive counterparts. Think Stats bailed my ass out of failing a stats class because it was so much clearer than the assigned book.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While the Jupyter-notebook format is lauded for its utility, some commenters noted the book&amp;#39;s unconventional pedagogical choices, such as introducing matrix multiplication and eigenvectors before vector addition &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084473&quot; title=&quot;Matrix multiplication introduced before vector addition... the &amp;#39;Linear Algebra Done Right&amp;#39; in me is screaming inside. That being said, it is definitely cool to have a Jupyter-notebook based set of examples of practical linear algebra&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084749&quot; title=&quot;And eigenvectors in the first lesson!&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. The community expresses deep appreciation for Downey’s commitment to the free flow of information in an era of &amp;#34;walled gardens&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48087465&quot; title=&quot;BTW, if Allen Downey is reads this, I just want to send some love. I saw the beginning of the Internet. Everybody was full of dreams of the free flow of information and shareable knowledge, which greatest representation was executable code. Now, when we are surrounded by walled gardens and evil billionaires, Allen is always sharing his knowledge for all the world. Thank you.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48090248&quot; title=&quot;Also: - Think Python - Think Data Structures - Think Java - Think Perl6 (!) - Modeling and Simulation in Python - Probably Overthinking It And more [1]. He&amp;#39;s a prolific writer, and very generous for offering many of them for free. I read several of them online or through O&amp;#39;Reilly, and bought printed copies just to appreciate his work. Really enjoyed Think DSP, Think Complexity, Think Bayes, etc. [1] https://www.amazon.com/stores/Allen-Downey/author/B001O8NBPS&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://til.andrew-quinn.me/posts/replacing-a-3-gb-sqlite-database-with-a-7-mb-fst-finite-state-trandsucer-binary/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Replacing a 3 GB SQLite db with a 10 MB FST (finite state transducer) binary&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (til.andrew-quinn.me)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48082676&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;173 points · 31 comments · by hiAndrewQuinn&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By rewriting a Finnish-English dictionary in Rust and utilizing a Finite State Transducer (FST), a developer reduced the application&amp;#39;s data footprint from a 3 GB SQLite database to a 10 MB binary, achieving a 300x space reduction through efficient prefix and suffix sharing. &lt;a href=&quot;https://til.andrew-quinn.me/posts/replacing-a-3-gb-sqlite-database-with-a-7-mb-fst-finite-state-trandsucer-binary/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Replacing a 3 GB SQLite database with a 10 MB FST (finite state transducer) binary    URL Source: https://til.andrew-quinn.me/posts/replacing-a-3-gb-sqlite-database-with-a-7-mb-fst-finite-state-trandsucer-binary/    Published Time: 2026-05-10T00:00:00Z    Markdown Content:  _Note for [numberphiles](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOJOfh2\_4PE): all numbers have been rounded to their first significant digit, because I’m a fan of Rob Eastaway’s [“zequals”…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights the value of &amp;#34;technical debt as leverage,&amp;#34; where starting with a &amp;#34;stupid&amp;#34; SQLite implementation allowed for rapid experimentation before optimizing for a more complex data structure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48083380&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I do wish to point out, of course, that the whole reason it was possible to experiment cheaply and come across this serendipity was because 9 months ago, faced with the choice to either do the bad easy thing or the good nothing, I chose to do the bad easy thing.5 The SQLite database worked! I understood how it worked, behind the scenes with its B-trees and its Full Text Search extension. This is the most important takeaway, imo, and a very valuable technique: Start with the obvious, stupid…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084217&quot; title=&quot;Technical debt, like all forms of debt, can be used for leverage.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084366&quot; title=&quot;I feel like it is important to manage the risk and to clearly manage this debt. personally I try to stay safe from both debt and technical debt until there are sound reasons for both. It is KISS stack for me personally (Keep it stupid simple) I would still consider technical debt to be different than other forms of debt though, It feels way more of a tradeoff to me but perhaps all debt can be classified as such. Either way I think it makes for an interesting decision nonetheless.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters noted that the Finite State Transducer (FST) is a rediscovery of Directed Acyclic Word Graphs (DAWGs), a structure famously used to optimize Scrabble programs by merging common suffixes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48083244&quot; title=&quot;I was halfway through the article and began thinking that his described data structure sounded very familiar to something I used about 20 years ago. Sure enough, the first paragraph on the Wikipedia entry for DAFSA is: DAFSA is the rediscovery of a data structure called Directed Acyclic Word Graph (DAWG)&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48083536&quot; title=&quot;Apparently the structure itself has a bit of a history. The word &amp;#39;rediscovery&amp;#39; tipped me off to go to Wikipedia myself and read up more about this. First Blumer et al., 1983 came up with a &amp;#39;DAWG&amp;#39;, but reading the abstract [1] I was left a little confused as to how exactly we get from &amp;#39;here is how we store all substrings of a string in O(|string|) space, with &amp;#39;is this a substring [yn]&amp;#39; recognition in O(|substring|) time&amp;#39; to the modern DAFSA, as cool and useful as that is. Come to think of it I…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084903&quot; title=&quot;This was a fun read! Thanks for the great introduction to Finite State Transducers. I hadn&amp;#39;t heard the formal term before, but your article gave me serious déjà vu. Years ago, I entered a Scrabble programming contest and needed to compress a GADDAG dictionary to fit into my 6MB L3 cache. Without knowing the official name for it, I ended up using the exact same suffix-compression mechanism by moving characters to the edges instead of the nodes to merge overlapping paths. Sharing my old write-up…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some questioned why standard compression wasn&amp;#39;t used on the original 3 GB database &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084620&quot; title=&quot;Why was the download 3gb, if the solution created a 300x reduction primarily by sharing suffixes? Wouldn’t vanilla compression have dealt with that and achieved a decent (not ideal) amount of compression of the database?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084753&quot; title=&quot;I think there is no vanilla compression in SQLite.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others pondered if AI would be capable of making such a conceptual leap from a naive solution to a specialized one &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48083741&quot; title=&quot;It jumped out at me too, but because I wondered what it would look like in the AI version of this story. Having had it build the SQL version do you ... a) miss the leap because you don&amp;#39;t understand how it works, don&amp;#39;t care to know, and go off to vibe the next thing b) ask it lots of questions because reasons to develop that deep understanding then make the leap or c) rely on it (prompt: &amp;#39;this can&amp;#39;t be good enough do better&amp;#39;) to go make the leap for you. (Assuming for the sake of argument that…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-09</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-09</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/jarredsumner/status/2053047748191232310&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bun&amp;#39;s experimental Rust rewrite hits 99.8% test compatibility on Linux x64 glibc&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073680&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;690 points · 670 comments · by heldrida&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bun&amp;#39;s experimental rewrite from Zig to Rust has achieved 99.8% test compatibility on Linux x64 glibc systems. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/jarredsumner/status/2053047748191232310&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xunroll.com&amp;amp;#x2F;thread&amp;amp;#x2F;2053047748191232310&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xunroll.com&amp;amp;#x2F;thread&amp;amp;#x2F;2053047748191232310&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Recent and related: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Zig → Rust porting guide&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=48016880&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=48016880&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt; - May 2026 (540 comments)&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Bun team’s experimental Rust rewrite achieved high test compatibility in just six days, a feat attributed to the use of LLMs like Anthropic&amp;#39;s Mythos to rapidly port code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077663&quot; title=&quot;cargo check reported over 16,000 compiler errors when I wrote that message. It could not print a version number or run JavaScript. I didn’t expect it to work this quickly and I also didn’t expect the performance to be as competitive. There’ll be a blog post with more details.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077571&quot; title=&quot;Very impressive that they could do this so quickly because I have been on a similar project (porting TypeScript to Rust) for 5 months. But I guess I don&amp;#39;t have access to Mythos and unlimited tokens. I&amp;#39;m also close to 100% pass rate. 99.6% at the time of writing. https://tsz.dev Rust is perfect for writing all of code using LLM. It&amp;#39;s strict type system makes is less likely to make very dumb mistakes that other languages might allow. Also want to note that writing the code using LLM doesn&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073976&quot; title=&quot;6 days of work to do this. Even if it doesn&amp;#39;t end up becoming meaningful, it shows just how tokens and work done will be linked now and in the future. It&amp;#39;s going to be hard to compete with someone or a company that has more compute. They will just be able to do things you can&amp;#39;t.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users believe moving away from Zig will resolve Bun&amp;#39;s history of memory bugs and crashes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077319&quot; title=&quot;I just want to comment that I think it&amp;#39;s a good change if we look past the AI involvement. Bun has had an extremely high amount of crashes/memory bugs due to them using Zig, unlike Deno which is Rust. Of course, if Bun&amp;#39;s Rust port has tons of `unsafe`, it won&amp;#39;t magically solve them all, but it&amp;#39;ll still get better&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077717&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I am so tired of worrying about &amp;amp; spending lots of time fixing memory leaks and crashes and stability issues. it would be so nice if the language provided more powerful tools for preventing these things. haven&amp;#39;t used zig...(only used rust) but zig doesn&amp;#39;t solve those problems?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue the reliance on &amp;#34;AI slop&amp;#34; and the abandonment of Zig&amp;#39;s design philosophy signals a decline in software quality and maintainability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48078968&quot; title=&quot;Completely unbased, but I don’t want to have to do anything with bun anymore. It’s just a gut feeling, but I don’t trust them and support them. They fork Zig to utilize LLM rewrites and build something the Zig team clearly disregarded (non-deterministic compiling) And now like a whiny baby they LLM rewrite to Rust. There is a very real chance that Zig design philosophy got them to the point where they are now by enforcing to make the tough but precise decisions and the Rust rewrite is the start…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48078446&quot; title=&quot;Also a few days before that: &amp;gt; I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 &amp;amp; 2026. We should have seen this coming after they got acquired by Anthropic, but it&amp;#39;s still disappointing. I&amp;#39;m not against large language models as a technology, just thoroughly disgusted how these &amp;#39;AI&amp;#39; companies rose to power, eating the software industry and the rest of society. It&amp;#39;s creating a very unhealthy dependency. Think a few steps ahead and…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite initial skepticism from the lead developer that the code might be &amp;#34;thrown out,&amp;#34; the project&amp;#39;s rapid progress and competitive performance have made a permanent transition more likely &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077362&quot; title=&quot;From 4 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48019226 &amp;gt; I work on Bun and this is my branch    &amp;gt;    &amp;gt; This whole thread is an overreaction. 302 comments about code that does not work. We haven’t committed to rewriting. There’s a very high chance all this code gets thrown out completely.    &amp;gt;    &amp;gt; I’m curious to see what a working version of this looks, what it feels like, how it performs and if/how hard it’d be to get it to pass Bun’s test suite and be maintainable. I’d like to be able to…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077663&quot; title=&quot;cargo check reported over 16,000 compiler errors when I wrote that message. It could not print a version number or run JavaScript. I didn’t expect it to work this quickly and I also didn’t expect the performance to be as competitive. There’ll be a blog post with more details.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;http://fourlightyears.blogspot.com/2026/05/i-returned-to-aws-and-was-reminded-hard.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I returned to AWS and was reminded why I left&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (fourlightyears.blogspot.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073201&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;711 points · 514 comments · by andrewstuart&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A former AWS advocate details his decision to abandon the platform due to high costs, extreme complexity, and predatory practices, a move reinforced by a recent account suspension that crippled his business email and highlighted poor customer support. &lt;a href=&quot;http://fourlightyears.blogspot.com/2026/05/i-returned-to-aws-and-was-reminded-hard.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: I returned to AWS - and was reminded HARD why I left.    URL Source: http://fourlightyears.blogspot.com/2026/05/i-returned-to-aws-and-was-reminded-hard.html    Published Time: Fri, 08 May 2026 20:27:36 GMT    Markdown Content:  # A blog about various stuff.: I returned to AWS - and was reminded HARD why I left.    # [A blog about various stuff.](http://fourlightyears.blogspot.com/)    ## Friday, May 8,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hacker News users describe AWS as an &amp;#34;adversarial&amp;#34; environment characterized by a complex, opaque UI that obscures pricing and forces users into &amp;#34;hyper-scaling&amp;#34; architectures even for simple projects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48083750&quot; title=&quot;Years ago, I joined a company, took over a dev team and was asked to launch the product in 3 months. They were using AWS, so I logged in the account to add a few more machines. Right there, in front of my eyes, were the signs of an adversarial, abusive relationship. The UI to fire up a new machine did not show me the price. I had to look up the price in another table that did not have the specs. I had to have the two tables open, cross check the specs and price. If I had learned one thing from…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48083449&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t work in that area, so I only touch AWS once in a while for personal fun projects. And every time it&amp;#39;s a nightmare. I&amp;#39;m just banging out a server for my experimental card game, not setting up an new financial institution. Everything looks as if I&amp;#39;m preparing to scale to infinity tomorrow, with a staff of a thousand and a budget backed by VCs. Fortunately there&amp;#39;s Netlify and similar, who put a gloss on it so that I don&amp;#39;t have to boil the ocean. I figure that one of these days I might…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48083993&quot; title=&quot;I agree with you at some degree, but I would like to point out that AWS pricing is much more complicated that you can calculate how much will you pay from a static number showing up on the UI. If it bothers you that you need to open two tabs for cross-checking the costs, you may want to avoid every cloud provider, not just AWS. Once you have NAT gateways, CloudFront, S3, auto scaling, loadbalancers, etc, calculating the cost becomes an art rather than an exact science. And if you don&amp;#39;t use…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that AWS’s complexity is a necessary reflection of enterprise-grade infrastructure requirements &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084873&quot; title=&quot;I always smile at posts like this. They&amp;#39;re right and wrong at the same time. Systems should be &amp;#39;as simple as possible, but no simpler&amp;#39;. And thinking that you can gloss over the detail is just going to create more hassle later on. IAM is just complex. I can&amp;#39;t think of any implementation of &amp;#39;users, groups, roles, policies, identity providers, oidc&amp;#39; that is truly simple. I&amp;#39;m reminded of a guy I worked with, who fought against Kubernetes adoption because it was &amp;#39;too complex&amp;#39;, only to slowly…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that many companies overspend by thousands of dollars on managed services that could be replaced by simpler VPS providers or self-hosted tools like Postgres and Prometheus &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48083450&quot; title=&quot;Why do people even bother with cloud? I’ve a couple of apps doing a few million a day. I am using Hetzner and before that used DigitalOcean. Mind you, for close to a decade. People are unnecessarily complicating stuff, and these clouds can go very expensive very quickly. Recently, I came across a company and they were spending $20k a month on GCP. I am like, are you kidding me, $20K for the kind of stuff you do??? It seems you do not understand how CPU, RAM and Disk work to plaster such…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48083501&quot; title=&quot;What amazes me is how Heroku absolutely nailed what most web apps need nearly 20 years ago.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant debate exists regarding AWS&amp;#39;s relationship with open-source projects: some view AWS as &amp;#34;eating the lunch&amp;#34; of creators by monetizing their work &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48083574&quot; title=&quot;A lot of these projects work on a business model where they open-source their core product, and provide advanced services, installation, maintenance or fully-managed services around their product. AWS was bypassing them by providing fully-managed services. On this, I am on the side of the people behind the projects. Basically AWS was eating their lunch. They had no choice but to change the licenses.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, while others argue that AWS’s forks (like Valkey and OpenSearch) were a justified response to restrictive license changes by companies with failing business models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48083506&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; AWS stomped on open source projects - despite the clear desire of projects like Elasticsearch, Redis, and MongoDB not to be cloned and monetized, AWS pushed ahead with OpenSearch, Valkey, and DocumentDB anyway, capturing the hosted-service money after those communities and companies had built the markets; the result was a wave of defensive licenses like SSPL, Elastic License, RSAL, and other source-available models designed less to stop ordinary users than to stop AWS from stripping…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48083763&quot; title=&quot;They have a problem with their business model, then. License changes to a formerly open source project are costly. The community reacts very strongly when license terms change after they&amp;#39;ve come to depend on a product, and they should. Why do we apply this standard to MongoDB but not to Apache, Linux, Postgres, or MariaDB? One purpose of an open source license is to allow many providers to provide the service. As I&amp;#39;ve talked about here previously, Elasticsearch wasn&amp;#39;t able to provide the…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://gowers.wordpress.com/2026/05/08/a-recent-experience-with-chatgpt-5-5-pro/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A recent experience with ChatGPT 5.5 Pro&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (gowers.wordpress.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071262&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;688 points · 519 comments · by _alternator_&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mathematician Timothy Gowers shares a recent experience using ChatGPT 5.5 Pro via a series of social media posts. &lt;a href=&quot;https://gowers.wordpress.com/2026/05/08/a-recent-experience-with-chatgpt-5-5-pro/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;twitter.com&amp;amp;#x2F;wtgowers&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2052830948685676605&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;twitter.com&amp;amp;#x2F;wtgowers&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2052830948685676605&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;wtgowers&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2052830948685676605&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;wtgowers&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2052830948685676605&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Academics report that frontier models like GPT-5.5 Pro are now capable of identifying complex mathematical errors and generating &amp;#34;ingenious,&amp;#34; seemingly original research ideas &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072512&quot; title=&quot;I am a physics professor and often use Gemini to check my papers. It is a formidable tool: it was able to find a clerical error (a missing imaginary unit in a complex mathematical expression) I was not able to find for days, and it often underlines connections between concepts and ideas that I overlooked. However, it often makes conceptual errors that I can spot only because I have good knowledge of the topic I am discussing. For instance, in 3D Clifford algebras it repeatedly confuses…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073659&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; &amp;#39;Even though I can motivate it in retrospect, ChatGPT’s idea to use h^2-dissociated sets to control relations of order at most h feels quite ingenious. As far as I can tell, this idea is completely original.&amp;#39; The question that keep bothering me is can an LLM generate an idea that is truly novel? How would/could that actually happen? But then that leads to the question - what are we actually doing when we think? Perhaps it&amp;#39;s as simple as the ability to just make mistakes that matters, the same…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that LLM progress follows an &amp;#34;S-curve&amp;#34; and may soon plateau, others point to rapid improvements on research-level physics benchmarks as evidence of continued momentum &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072750&quot; title=&quot;I assume you&amp;#39;re using the &amp;#39;regular&amp;#39; Pro version of Gemini 3.1 for the above, rather than the Deep Think mode, which is more comparable to GPT-5.5 Pro. To my knowledge, regular 3.1 Pro is a tier below and often makes mistakes. Moreover, there&amp;#39;s no reason to believe the progress of LLMs, which couldn&amp;#39;t reliably solve high-school math problems just 3–4 years ago, will stop anytime soon. You might want to track the progress of these models on the CritPt benchmark, which is built on *unpublished,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073337&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;  there&amp;#39;s no reason to believe the progress of LLMs [...] will stop anytime soon Wrong. Every advancement has followed a s curve. Where we are on that curve is anyones guess. Or maybe &amp;#39;this time its different&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073302&quot; title=&quot;There are many indications that model progress is slowing down, so that is not entirely accurate.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. This shift raises concerns about the future of PhD training, as AI may soon automate the &amp;#34;gentle&amp;#34; introductory problems traditionally used to mentor students &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072076&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a very long post with a mix of technical (math) and philosophical sections. Here are the most striking points to reflect upon IMHO. &amp;gt; It seems to me that training beginning PhD students to do research [...] has just got harder, since one obvious way to help somebody get started is to give them a problem that looks as though it might be a relatively gentle one. If LLMs are at the point where they can solve “gentle problems”, then that is no longer an option. The lower bound for contributing…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the high cost of &amp;#34;Deep Think&amp;#34; models has created a digital divide, though industry insiders occasionally offer individual sponsorships to researchers in underfunded regions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072163&quot; title=&quot;As a TCS assistant professor from Eastern Europe, I always am a little jealous of the biggest names in math having such an easy access to the expensive, long thinking models. Paying for Pro from any of my current academic budgets is completely ouf of the field of reality here -- all budgets tend to have restricted uses and software payments fit into very few categories. Effectively, I&amp;#39;d have to ask for a brand new grant and hope the grant rules allow for large software payments and I won&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072377&quot; title=&quot;@NotOscarWilde drop your email here, I will reach out and happy to get you a pro account for a few months so you can try 5.5 pro.(work at OAI)&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cyberinsider.com/eu-calls-vpns-a-loophole-that-needs-closing-in-age-verification-push/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;EU Parliamentary Research Service calls VPNs &amp;quot;a loophole that needs closing&amp;quot;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cyberinsider.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072190&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;631 points · 433 comments · by muse900&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The European Parliamentary Research Service has labeled VPNs a &amp;#34;loophole&amp;#34; that allows minors to bypass online age-verification systems, suggesting that future EU legislation could introduce child-safety requirements or age restrictions for VPN providers to prevent users from circumventing regional content protections. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cyberinsider.com/eu-calls-vpns-a-loophole-that-needs-closing-in-age-verification-push/&quot; title=&quot;Title: EU calls VPNs “a loophole that needs closing” in age verification push    URL Source: https://cyberinsider.com/eu-calls-vpns-a-loophole-that-needs-closing-in-age-verification-push/    Published Time: 2026-05-08T12:17:47+00:00    Markdown Content:  # EU calls VPNs “a loophole that needs closing” in age verification push    *   [Skip to main content](https://cyberinsider.com/eu-calls-vpns-a-loophole-that-needs-closing-in-age-verification-push/#genesis-content)  *   [Skip to after header…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users argue the headline is misleading because the EU paper merely summarizes a debate rather than official policy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072611&quot; title=&quot;This title seems misleading. The EP paper appears to be highlighting the existence of a debate regarding VPN. Relevant quote: &amp;#39;Some argue that this is a loophole in the legislation that needs closing and call for age verification to be required for VPNs as well. In response, some VPN providers argue that they do not share information with third parties and state that their services are not intended for use by children in the first place. The Children&amp;#39;s Commissioner for England has called for…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, many commenters view the proposed regulation of VPNs as a dangerous step toward mass surveillance and the erosion of civil liberties &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072410&quot; title=&quot;Ah yes, the most pressing issue of our times. Mandatory surveillance of every person&amp;#39;s activities is a reasonable solution to the critical issue of teenagers watching porn, who totally won&amp;#39;t be able to bypass this by... grabbing Dad&amp;#39;s phone. Obviously, it&amp;#39;s not about the children. It was never about the children. If I had my way every one of these people would be taken to a gulag, because they are evil, have evil intentions, and blatantly lie to further their evil goals. I am tired of the…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072721&quot; title=&quot;Here we go again with new restrictions on civil liberties. This is Chat Control all over again. The EU won&amp;#39;t stop until it has access to all your data, all your messages, anything you read, save, send will be scrutinized by the the big great EU and it&amp;#39;s little minions. Hey, at least we get the freedom of movement right?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong consensus that &amp;#34;protecting children&amp;#34; is being used as a pretext for state control, drawing parallels to internet censorship in China &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073285&quot; title=&quot;In case people no longer remember, when China started to require websites to register for a license before be allowed to operate, it was for &amp;#39;protecting the children&amp;#39; too. This simple policy then goes on to silence most individual publisher(/self-media) and consolidated the industry into the hands of the few, with no opportunity left for smaller entrepreneurs. This is arguably much worse than allowing children to watch porn online, because this will for sure effect people&amp;#39;s whole life in a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; and criticizing the shift of parenting responsibilities onto the government &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072708&quot; title=&quot;I agree, age verification on the web should 100% banned. Parents should learn how to be parents; the government shouldn&amp;#39;t force companies to do parenting instead.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073761&quot; title=&quot;Parents can protect their children. Source: I’m a parent. My kids haven’t seen porn and can’t access the internet. This doesn’t affect the free exchange of ideas that my fellow countrymen enjoy. Governments getting involved absolutely, unequivocally will be used to clamp down on the free exchange of ideas.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics suggest that messing with internet infrastructure to prevent adolescents from accessing porn is a disproportionate response that threatens anonymity and the free exchange of ideas &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072909&quot; title=&quot;These dimwits (and I don&amp;#39;t just mean those in EU) seriously want to stop adolescents from watching porn, and are ready to mess with internet infrastructure for that. That&amp;#39;s a depressing manifestation of aging society&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072343&quot; title=&quot;How come tax loopholes aren&amp;#39;t as scrutinized? Mandatory age verification online is a blight imho. It should be outlawed.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073761&quot; title=&quot;Parents can protect their children. Source: I’m a parent. My kids haven’t seen porn and can’t access the internet. This doesn’t affect the free exchange of ideas that my fellow countrymen enjoy. Governments getting involved absolutely, unequivocally will be used to clamp down on the free exchange of ideas.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/08/technology/meta-ai-employees-miserable.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Meta&amp;#39;s embrace of AI is making its employees miserable&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nytimes.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077126&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;438 points · &lt;strong&gt;513 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by JumpCrisscross&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meta employees are reportedly revolting against a new mandatory policy that tracks their computer activity and screen data to train artificial intelligence models, as the company pivots toward an AI-centric future. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/08/technology/meta-ai-employees-miserable.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Meta’s Embrace of A.I. Is Making Its Employees Miserable - The New York Times    URL Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/08/technology/meta-ai-employees-miserable.html    Published Time: 2026-05-08T14:18:51.000Z    Markdown Content:  # Meta’s Embrace of A.I. Is Making Its Employees Miserable - The New York Times    [](https://www.nytimes.com/)  [Artificial Intelligence](https://www.nytimes.com/spotlight/artificial-intelligence)    *   [A.I.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a deep-seated cynicism toward Meta’s leadership, with critics describing a toxic, fear-based culture where employees engage in political gatekeeping and &amp;#34;kissing the ring&amp;#34; to support Mark Zuckerberg’s shifting fixations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48079367&quot; title=&quot;Here&amp;#39;s how things play out: Zuck gets some idea, he&amp;#39;s surrounded by a bunch of yes men who say &amp;#39;yes, this will definitely change the world&amp;#39;, then it turns into this optics game of kissing the ring. You ask yourself &amp;#39;how could they blow 80B on the Metaverse like that&amp;#39;, this is how. DON&amp;#39;T JOIN META, no matter how fast the recruiters reply to your messages. No matter how cool the work sounds (the managers lie in team matching). There&amp;#39;s a reason why the average tenure is &amp;lt;2 years. It&amp;#39;s a toxic and…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48079193&quot; title=&quot;Years ago when following what Zuckerberg did occupied more space in my brain, it struck me that he can &amp;#39;hate leakers&amp;#39; but not look inward and change his behavior in a way that doesn&amp;#39;t upset people and make them want to leak. He is a very reactionary guy, and not a &amp;#39;how can I be the change&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;what did I do to cause this&amp;#39; kind of guy. I thought of this during his various scandals at the end of the 2010s. Everything was a PR reaction for him, rather than looking inward. The best PR is not being…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some find personal joy in using AI at smaller scales, others argue that in a corporate context, it is being used to generate &amp;#34;AI slop&amp;#34; that offloads labor onto recipients and serves as a tool for subjugation rather than progress &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077684&quot; title=&quot;As someone who has spent a vast portion of life believing technology would make life better, I&amp;#39;ve come to the realisation that this idea is a fallacy. Technology amplifies power and until we collectively redefine and enforce a value system that benefits us all, the advancements in technology simply serve as a means of subjugation&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077824&quot; title=&quot;I think there is a bit of wider social norms piece missing as well on AI use in knowledge work context. Someone forwarded an enormous amount of text over teams the other day at work. From someone (bless her) that always means well but usually averages about one spelling mistake per word and rarely goes over 20 words per message. Clearly copy paste chatgpt. For say hn gang that thinks in terms of context shifts, information load and things on THAT wave length the problem with that situation is…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48078488&quot; title=&quot;I noticed a lot more joy using AI from people at smaller companies or working by themselves :) I say this as someone self employed that burned almost $1000 on tokens last month. And had. A lot of fun doing it.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, there is a consensus that technology is currently amplifying power imbalances and societal &amp;#34;idiocracy&amp;#34; rather than improving human well-being &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077684&quot; title=&quot;As someone who has spent a vast portion of life believing technology would make life better, I&amp;#39;ve come to the realisation that this idea is a fallacy. Technology amplifies power and until we collectively redefine and enforce a value system that benefits us all, the advancements in technology simply serve as a means of subjugation&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48078093&quot; title=&quot;Let&amp;#39;s go there: this is what the Unabomber was on about, and there has long been an effort to stop people noticing this. Ultimately you end up with either going for totalitarianism (either to arrest development in the status quo, maintain a state of anarcho primitivism or technocratic tedium) or we resist that and break out by trying to forge forward into some unknown unchartered territory. In practice we have no choice but to aim for the unknown and hope. Can&amp;#39;t lie and say I can see what the…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48078201&quot; title=&quot;Not so long ago, I have come to a rather unpleasant realization that whether a lot of that will happen, will depend heavily on whether the ones currently trying to make technology control every facet of our lives decide to allow society get dumber first ( think Idiocracy, which AI very much could allow ) or not in which case it is anyone&amp;#39;s guess, because people will still have some basic skills and memories of what could be. I am hoping for the best, but life has taught me hard not to bet…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://chrismorgan.info/no-query-strings&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I’ve banned query strings&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (chrismorgan.info)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48076173&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;549 points · 283 comments · by susam&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author has decided to stop using query strings on their website, opting for a simpler URL structure inspired by similar minimalist approaches to web design. &lt;a href=&quot;https://chrismorgan.info/no-query-strings&quot; title=&quot;Related: &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;susam.net&amp;amp;#x2F;no-query-strings.html&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;susam.net&amp;amp;#x2F;no-query-strings.html&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The distinction between URL paths and query strings is largely arbitrary and determined by the server, leading some to argue that query strings are an outdated implementation detail that should never have existed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48078192&quot; title=&quot;Wait until you realize that the difference between path and query string is entirely arbitrary and decided by the server. Query strings should never have existed. They are an implementation detail of CGI webservers that leaked all over everything and now smells really bad.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find banning them to be a &amp;#34;minor inconvenience&amp;#34; or a confusing penalty for users who cannot control appended strings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077505&quot; title=&quot;The tone of this and Chris&amp;#39;s post gives me the impression that it&amp;#39;s harmful to include these query parameters, but I don&amp;#39;t understand how. Could someone elucidate me? I understand it can mangle some URLs and that&amp;#39;s good enough reason not do it, but even then it seems like a minor incovenience.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077124&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;So I’ve decided to try a blanket ban for this site: no unauthorised query strings. His site returns (I think incorrectly) a 414 if a request includes a query string. If this protest is meant to advocate for the user, who presumably wasn&amp;#39;t able to manage that string in the first place, why would you penalize them for it being there? Why not just use it as a cue to tell users how they can make this decision themselves (e.g. through browser tools)?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others note that query strings are technically part of the URL API, making a 404 or 400 response a valid reaction to unexpected parameters &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077360&quot; title=&quot;You know I was actually really curious about this so I went back to the HTML and URL W3C standards and surprisingly they don&amp;#39;t actually have any definitions of format other than being percent encoded. One might conflate query strings with &amp;#39;form-urlencoded&amp;#39;[0] query strings, which is one potential interoperability format, but in general a queries string is just any percent encoded string following a &amp;#39;?&amp;#39; in a url[1], and just another property in the &amp;#39;URL&amp;#39; HTML object that can be used in the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48078215&quot; title=&quot;Back in the day it was reasonably common for CMSs and forums to only have an index.php, and routing entirely by query string (in form-urlencoded form, people were not savages). So you would have index.php?p=home and index.php?p=shop. Or index.php?action=showthread&amp;amp;forum=42&amp;amp;thread=17976. It should be immediately obvious that in that scheme 404 is indeed the correct answer to unknown query parameters In fact lots of sites still work like that, they just hide it behind a couple rewrite rules in…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents of query strings argue they prevent the &amp;#34;overuse&amp;#34; of paths for complex data like git revisions and filters, which can become unmanageable if concatenated indiscriminately &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48078589&quot; title=&quot;If you&amp;#39;re routing like it&amp;#39;s 1999, sure, 404. On the other hand, if it&amp;#39;s a CRUD app and you&amp;#39;re filtering a list of entities by various field values?  Returning that no items matched your selection (or an empty list, if an API) makes more sense than a 404, which would more appropriate for an attempt to pull up a nonexistent entity URI.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48078903&quot; title=&quot;In my current project I use URIs to refer to absolutely any entity in a git(-ish) repo. Files, branches, revisions, diffs, anything. URI turns out to be a really good addressing scheme for everything. Surprise. But the most used and abused element is always the path. Query takes a lot of that mess away. Might have been unmanageable otherwise. https://github.com/gritzko/beagle&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48078963&quot; title=&quot;In fact, GitHub URIs are a good example of overusing paths: https://github.com/gritzko/beagle/blob/a7e17290a39250092055f... - user gritzko,    - project beagle,     - view blob,     - commit a7e17290a39250092055fcda5ae7015868dabdb4,     - file path VERBS.md ... all concatenated indiscriminately.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.archive.org/2026/05/06/internet-archive-switzerland-expanding-a-global-mission-to-preserve-knowledge/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Internet Archive Switzerland&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.archive.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48074265&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;683 points · 108 comments · by hggh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Internet Archive has expanded its global mission by launching Internet Archive Switzerland to further preserve and provide access to digital knowledge. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.archive.org/2026/05/06/internet-archive-switzerland-expanding-a-global-mission-to-preserve-knowledge/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;internetarchive.ch&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;internetarchive.ch&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The launch of Internet Archive Switzerland has sparked discussion regarding the organizational structure of the Internet Archive&amp;#39;s global affiliates, which currently operate as independent but mission-aligned entities sharing key leadership &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48074405&quot; title=&quot;That website is really struggling. Very tempting to go to a mirror on archive.org to view it :) This seems very distinct from Internet Archive in the US, I wonder how separate it is. Internet Archive Canada (I worked there in 2024) operated like it was a subsidiary, even though I think it was technically an independent organization with some shared directors. Same Slack, same archive.org email domain, etc. IA.ch has Brewster and Caslon on the board. I suspect that for the political threats of…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48074438&quot; title=&quot;Relevant blog post: https://blog.archive.org/2026/05/06/internet-archive-switzer... &amp;gt; Internet Archive Switzerland joins a growing group of mission-aligned organizations, alongside Internet Archive, Internet Archive Canada, and Internet Archive Europe. Together, these independent libraries strengthen a shared vision: building a distributed, resilient digital library for the world.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users criticize the corporate design of existing branches like IA Europe &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48075178&quot; title=&quot;I was interested in the others, but https://www.internetarchive.eu is a horrible corporate-looking site with a hero image, a boast about AI, a carousel of news that won&amp;#39;t scroll with doing its slow scroll animation, a huge &amp;#39;meet the team&amp;#39; section with mugshots and boring profiles, social media links, a newsletter signup form, and nothing to say where the actual archive is.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that the network must evolve into a decentralized, peer-to-peer system similar to Usenet or BitTorrent to survive legal threats and DMCA takedowns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077155&quot; title=&quot;IA needs to do what Usenet has done. Have a bunch of mission-aligned but unrelated orgs (under different ownership and distributed around the world) that peer with each other, distribute all the content obtained by any of the orgs to each other, but that have no technical channel nor capability to distribute DMCA complaints and takedown requests. This is (AFAIK) basically how Usenet piracy works. You send your warez to one provider, and that provider instantly replicates them to all the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077373&quot; title=&quot;So they should use bit torrent. IMO personal security would only be improved if we diversified away from &amp;#39;the open web&amp;#39;. &amp;#39;Flood the field&amp;#39; with protocols and pre-shared key networks where we have to generate keys together in meat space, make it too expensive to operate the panopticon. Everyone putting their eggs in the open web basket, gathering in that public commons means all it takes is one bomb on us all, so to speak.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48075604&quot; title=&quot;Stop complaining about availability. Instead, create a solution. If tpb dot org can still exist ... At least these people tried. We need a p2p archive solution ASAP. Before our history is entirely re-written.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, participants note that such distributed models face significant hurdles, including technical vulnerabilities to surveillance and unresolved legal questions regarding the &amp;#34;fair use&amp;#34; of automated file sharing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077806&quot; title=&quot;BitTorrent allows untrusted users (read: industry plants) to connect and slurp down direct IP addresses to swarm participants. It&amp;#39;s an unanswered legal question whether low-level uploading (such as the percentages one would get as a &amp;#39;leech&amp;#39;, connecting to the torrent and then disconnecting immediately after completion) might fall under &amp;#39;fair use&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;fair dealing&amp;#39; statutes in various jurisdictions. US-centric here: I feel that uploading a small percentage of a file as a condition of downloading…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/trq212/status/2052809885763747935&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Using Claude Code: The unreasonable effectiveness of HTML&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071940&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;513 points · 270 comments · by pretext&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article explores how Claude Code leverages the inherent structure and simplicity of HTML to achieve high efficiency in web development and AI-driven coding tasks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/trq212/status/2052809885763747935&quot; title=&quot;Examples: &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;thariqs.github.io&amp;amp;#x2F;html-effectiveness&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;thariqs.github.io&amp;amp;#x2F;html-effectiveness&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Related: &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;simonwillison.net&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;May&amp;amp;#x2F;8&amp;amp;#x2F;unreasonable-effectiveness-of-html&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;simonwillison.net&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;May&amp;amp;#x2F;8&amp;amp;#x2F;unreasonable-effectiven...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether using HTML as a primary output format for LLMs hinders human-AI co-authorship, with critics arguing that HTML&amp;#39;s verbosity creates friction compared to Markdown &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072400&quot; title=&quot;My concern here is that by gravitating to HTML you lose the ability for a human (you!) to easily co-author the document with the LLM. If it’s just an explainer for your consumption, that’s not a concern - but if it’s a spec sheet for something more complex, I deeply value being able to dive in and edit what is produced for me. With a HTML doc it is much harder to do that than with MD. Now of course you could just reprompt your LLM to change the HTML - but when I already have a clear idea of…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073408&quot; title=&quot;Templated though, not manually writing it out for every blog post say. I think GP means it just has more friction as a writing format than markdown for example.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some maintain that HTML is a simple, long-standing standard that modern editors handle easily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072604&quot; title=&quot;We have been authoring HTML by hand for decades with ease. Text editors are very good at it, and many have commands to auto-wrap, auto-close etc. Reading and writing is simple.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072654&quot; title=&quot;I suppose that only applies if you constrain yourself to a raw teletypewriter emulator… in any proper coding environment, editing HTML should be absolutely simple - even an embedded WYSIWYG editor would be an option if rich model output is a way we head into.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that many developers lack the fluency to edit it manually and that the shift favors agent-led workflows over human control &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073149&quot; title=&quot;You have been authoring HTML by hand for decades. Not every SWE is a FE dev.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073117&quot; title=&quot;Yes that’s the case. And as Anthropic staff, author has an incentive to promote workflows that require an agent to interact with text documents.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073267&quot; title=&quot;Most front end devs can’t get HTML right either.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these concerns, some users find the &amp;#34;single index.html&amp;#34; approach highly effective for rapidly prototyping and sharing portable, dependency-free tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072225&quot; title=&quot;When exploring a new idea or tool, my go to prompt is ```  In a single index.html, no dependencies, sparse styling, create an app that ``` Even before AI, it&amp;#39;s how I built small tools, and there&amp;#39;s something lovely about being able to email my friends the tool, and tell them &amp;#39;If you want to make a change, toss it to your LLM!&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://matduggan.com/the-intolerable-hypocrisy-of-cyberlibertarianism/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The hypocrisy of cyberlibertarianism&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (matduggan.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48074952&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;408 points · 375 comments · by ColinWright&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The article argues that &amp;#34;cyberlibertarianism,&amp;#34; a 1990s ideology promising a decentralized utopia through deregulation, was a hypocritical facade that allowed massive corporations to monopolize the internet while shifting all social and ethical responsibilities onto unpaid users and the public. &lt;a href=&quot;https://matduggan.com/the-intolerable-hypocrisy-of-cyberlibertarianism/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Intolerable Hypocrisy of Cyberlibertarianism    URL Source: https://matduggan.com/the-intolerable-hypocrisy-of-cyberlibertarianism/    Published Time: 2026-05-07T09:43:28.000Z    Markdown Content:  I like the Internet. I am old enough to remember the pre-Internet era and despite the younger generations pining for those simpler days, I was there. Paper maps were absolutely horrible, just you and a compass in your car on the side of the road in the middle of the night trying to figure out…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters debate whether the &amp;#34;Declaration of Independence of Cyberspace&amp;#34; was a failed prophecy or a stolen dream, with some arguing that the internet has become less humane through increased demonization and &amp;#34;psychological capture&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48076324&quot; title=&quot;I was a great admirer (and later friend) of Barlow, and I&amp;#39;m still very deeply influenced by the Declaration and many adjacent phenomena. I agree with some fraction of this post in terms of seeing many people shelving these principles when it gets inconvenient for them. In the past few months, I&amp;#39;ve been troubled by one specific part of the Declaration, in the final paragraph: &amp;gt; We will create a civilization of the Mind in Cyberspace. May it be more humane and fair than the world your governments…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48076467&quot; title=&quot;Maybe it&amp;#39;s just my contrarian nature, but this sells me on cyberlibertarianism. There&amp;#39;s nothing preventing you from setting up a web server, downloading free software to run it, getting your friends to view it, building encrypted communication apps that no government can crack, pirating any piece of content in the world, etc... A libertarian society won&amp;#39;t coddle you, and there&amp;#39;s psychopaths like Meta who show up in the space and convince a lot of people to follow them. Of course those people…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48076637&quot; title=&quot;The article was interesting to read not necessarily as a generative spark but as a datapoint, a symptom of how effective, in the long run, the response from those who saw the internet as a threat was. Only someone who&amp;#39;s lost the plot (or arrived late) would summarily conflate Barlow&amp;#39;s 1996 Declaration with &amp;#39;one of those sovereign citizen TikToks where someone in traffic court is claiming diplomatic immunity under maritime law&amp;#39;. The article itself has fallen victim to the weaponized co-optation…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While critics point to the loss of physical ownership and the rise of corporate &amp;#34;enshittification,&amp;#34; others contend that technology has successfully delivered on its promises of global connectivity and falling poverty &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48076147&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Democracy will flourish. The gap between rich and poor will close. The lion will lie down with the lamb, and the lamb will have a Pentium II. We also have the advantage of hindsight and know, without question, that all of these predicted outcomes were wrong. Not &amp;#39;directionally wrong&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;wrong in the details.&amp;#39; Wrong the way it would be wrong to predict that if you set your kitchen on fire, the result will be a renovation. This is where I fundamentally don&amp;#39;t align with the author&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48076299&quot; title=&quot;Same. I’ll gladly take CDs and DVDs over modern streaming platforms. Before all of this streaming crap music and taste had weight. You find people with the same interests and you share physical medium. No corporation in the world had a power to stop me from giving my copy to another person. Now you either like and pay forever like a good cattle or you hide like a rat from the watchful copyright gods on torrents.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Disagreements persist over whether government intervention is the solution to online toxicity or if the state&amp;#39;s monopoly on violence remains a greater threat than digital &amp;#34;psychopaths&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48076467&quot; title=&quot;Maybe it&amp;#39;s just my contrarian nature, but this sells me on cyberlibertarianism. There&amp;#39;s nothing preventing you from setting up a web server, downloading free software to run it, getting your friends to view it, building encrypted communication apps that no government can crack, pirating any piece of content in the world, etc... A libertarian society won&amp;#39;t coddle you, and there&amp;#39;s psychopaths like Meta who show up in the space and convince a lot of people to follow them. Of course those people…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48076577&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Of course those people suck, but the solution isn&amp;#39;t government. Why? That seems like a big assertion to make in a side sentence without any supporting argument.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48076705&quot; title=&quot;Well, governments are coercive forces with a total monopoly on the legal system and the use of violence. Perhaps monopolies being bad is reason enough? There are the hundreds of millions (billions?) of people murdered by governments throughout history, including the many atrocities modern governments are committing today, which is almost surely reason enough. And then there are the philosophical arguments against political authority, called philosophical anarchism, which can be quite…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.kronis.dev/blog/apple-is-increasing-my-cortisol-levels&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Distributing Mac software is increasing my cortisol levels&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.kronis.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48075366&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;387 points · 275 comments · by LorenDB&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer details his frustration with Apple’s expensive and cumbersome code-signing process, criticizing the $99 annual fee, technical hurdles in identity verification, and a broader industry trend of &amp;#34;rent-seeking&amp;#34; that gatekeeps hobbyist software distribution on macOS and Windows. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.kronis.dev/blog/apple-is-increasing-my-cortisol-levels&quot; title=&quot;Title: Apple is increasing my cortisol levels    URL Source: https://blog.kronis.dev/blog/apple-is-increasing-my-cortisol-levels    Published Time: Sat, 09 May 2026 22:21:16 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Apple is increasing my cortisol levels | blog.kronis.dev    # [blog.kronis.dev](https://blog.kronis.dev/)    [Home](https://blog.kronis.dev/) | [Feed (RSS)](https://blog.kronis.dev/blog.rss) | [Feed (Atom)](https://blog.kronis.dev/blog.atom) | [Feed (JSON)](https://blog.kronis.dev/blog.json) | [About…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The macOS distribution process is criticized for creating a &amp;#34;false dichotomy&amp;#34; where users must either accept Apple&amp;#39;s restrictive defaults or completely disable security features via the Terminal &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077165&quot; title=&quot;Any user who does not like Gatekeeper can turn it off on their machine in ten seconds by running this in a Terminal: sudo spctl —-master-disable People will say, no, that’s too big a hammer, it’s not safe… but then, like, what do you actually want? Either you keep Gatekeeper because you like the friction it introduces, or you don’t like that friction and you should go turn it off. Pick one, you obviously can’t have both! Of course, you as the developer can’t make this choice for your users… but…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48078861&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; what do you actually want? Give me the ability to choose what I trust. “You can either trust Apple and nobody else, even yourself, or you can trust literally everybody” is obviously not a good faith implementation of this. Apple excels at steering the narrative with false conflation and false dichotomy, I’d also remind you of the came-and-went secure boot debate, which Apple successfully steered into Apple owns the encryption keys vs no encryption, and people just kind of forgot to ask, wait,…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48080159&quot; title=&quot;This is that false dichotomy. You can turn off all protection, as you point out. So who Apple markets Neo&amp;#39;s to isn&amp;#39;t a factor. &amp;gt; Apple’s fault if nobody else decided to make their own trust repositories and the only alternative on the market is to have no safeguard at all. Does Apple provide a means for enabling third party trust systems, without disabling Apple&amp;#39;s protections in general? If not, that is a serious problem of Apple&amp;#39;s choosing. Nobody (to a first order approximation) want&amp;#39;s to…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue these hurdles are easily bypassed by technical users, developers contend the $99 annual fee and friction of notarization discourage hobbyist and open-source contributions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077436&quot; title=&quot;Rather than just having the options &amp;#39;Done&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;Move to Bin&amp;#39;, give me an option to actually run it without having to manually go into System Settings each and every time without disabling security features? The added friction feels more like a way to force developers to pay Apple an annual fee for distributing rather than for my safety. Not saying it doesn&amp;#39;t help with safety, just that it&amp;#39;s more weighed to the former.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077524&quot; title=&quot;10 seconds or 30 seconds, it&amp;#39;s just too much friction to ask end users to do. I actually develop on a Mac, but I&amp;#39;ve written off Apple as a target system for hobby/open source projects. Between quarantine, code signing, and notarizing (which requires $99 a year), it&amp;#39;s just not worth it. Good for Apple users if they like this shit--I&amp;#39;m just not going to bother with distributing to the platform anymore. macOS is slowly getting like Windows, where, on a fresh install you have to go through and turn…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Comparisons to other platforms are mixed: some highlight Apple’s poor backward compatibility compared to Windows &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077697&quot; title=&quot;I have been developing software for Macs and PCs as an Indie for 20 years now. I sympathize with the author of the post. You get the feeling that Apple thinks you should be grateful that they allow you to develop apps for their platform. The author didn&amp;#39;t mention Apple&amp;#39;s contempt for backward compatibility. Apple like to regularly nuke their entire developer system from orbit.  Try running an app developed 10 years ago on the latest version of macOS. It probably won&amp;#39;t run. Microsoft are much…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, while others note that Windows&amp;#39; digital certificates are even more expensive and Linux requires its own manual permissions like `chmod +x` &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077753&quot; title=&quot;Isn&amp;#39;t code signing even harder/more expensive on Windows?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077697&quot; title=&quot;I have been developing software for Macs and PCs as an Indie for 20 years now. I sympathize with the author of the post. You get the feeling that Apple thinks you should be grateful that they allow you to develop apps for their platform. The author didn&amp;#39;t mention Apple&amp;#39;s contempt for backward compatibility. Apple like to regularly nuke their entire developer system from orbit.  Try running an app developed 10 years ago on the latest version of macOS. It probably won&amp;#39;t run. Microsoft are much…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077460&quot; title=&quot;So, Linux gets a free pass for requiring chmod +x to run his tool, but needing to run xattr on MacOS is somehow worthy of an entire blog post to complain about it? Serious question - Is it really true that Windows 11 will run an untrusted .exe without a warning?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.15597&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LLMs corrupt your documents when you delegate&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (arxiv.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073246&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;465 points · 189 comments · by rbanffy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A new study reveals that current Large Language Models frequently corrupt documents during long delegated workflows, with even frontier models introducing silent, compounding errors into an average of 25% of content across various professional domains. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.15597&quot; title=&quot;Title: LLMs Corrupt Your Documents When You Delegate    URL Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.15597    Published Time: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:15:30 GMT    Markdown Content:  # [2604.15597] LLMs Corrupt Your Documents When You Delegate    [Skip to main content](https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.15597#content)    [![Image 1: Cornell University Logo](https://arxiv.org/static/browse/0.3.4/images/icons/cu/cornell-reduced-white-SMALL.svg)](https://www.cornell.edu/)    [Learn about arXiv becoming an independent…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely agree that &amp;#34;round-tripping&amp;#34; entire documents through LLMs causes &amp;#34;semantic ablation&amp;#34; or degradation similar to JPEG artifacts, where nuance and precision are lost as the model pulls content toward a homogenous equilibrium &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48075159&quot; title=&quot;Least shocking thing I&amp;#39;ve read about LLMs recently. They are essentially like that one JPEG meme, where each pass of saving as JPEG slightly degrades the quality until by the end its unrecognizable. Except with LLMs, the starting point is intent. Each pass of the LLMs degrades the intent, like in the case of a precise scientific paper, just a little bit of nuance, a little bit of precision is lost with a re-wording here and there. LLMs are mean reversion machines, the more &amp;#39;outside of their…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48074543&quot; title=&quot;Yeah I&amp;#39;ve been saying this for a while: AI-washing any text will degrade it, compounding with each pass. &amp;#39;Semantic ablation&amp;#39; is my favorite term for it: https://www.theregister.com/software/2026/02/16/semantic-abl...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue the study&amp;#39;s methodology is flawed because it relies on a basic &amp;#34;read/write&amp;#34; harness rather than the surgical, diff-based editing tools used by state-of-the-art agents to avoid memory-based recitation errors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48075252&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m suspicious of their results with regards to tool usage. It&amp;#39;s unsurprising that round-tripping long content through an LLM results in corruption. Frequent LLM users already know not to do that. They claim that tool use didn&amp;#39;t help, which surprised me... but they also said: &amp;gt; To test this, we implemented a basic agentic harness (Yao et al., 2022) with file reading, writing, and code execution tools (Appendix M). We note this is not an optimized state-of-the-art agent system; future work could…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48075481&quot; title=&quot;Where this result is actually interesting and relevant is when a coding agent splits a large source file into multiple smaller files. Opus + Claude Code will try to recite long sections of source code from memory into each of the new files, instead of using some sort of copy/paste operation like a human would. Moving a file is a bit easier. LLMs may sometimes try to recite the file from memory. But if you tell them to use &amp;#39;git mv&amp;#39; and fix the compiler errors, they mostly will. Ordinary editing…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48075352&quot; title=&quot;This experiment needs to be put in perspective. Let me explain. IF you did this SAME experiment with a human and had a human read an ENTIRE document and then reproduce said document with edits. The DOCUMENT would DEGRADE even more. The way this experiment is conducted is not inline with how current agentic AI is used OR how even humans edit documents. Here&amp;#39;s how agentic AI currently typically do edits: 1. They read the whole document.   2. They come up with a patch. A diff of the section they…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users share anecdotes of &amp;#34;brainworms&amp;#34; and compounding mistakes that require manual restoration of codebases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48076544&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve definitely experienced this while coding with LLMs. Often, after a flurry of feature work in which I thought I was being reasonably careful but moving very fast, I take a closer look at some small piece of code and go &amp;#39;holy shit&amp;#39;. Then I have to spend a few hours going over everything and carefully reworking parts where things didn&amp;#39;t quite go how I&amp;#39;d like, where I was unclear, or where the LLM&amp;#39;s brainworms kicked in. Quality is really important to me in its own right, but I also worry…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48074913&quot; title=&quot;LLMs will make mistakes on every turn. The mistakes will have little to no apparent connection to &amp;#39;difficulty&amp;#39; or what may or may not be prevalent in the training data. They will be mistakes at all levels of operation, from planning to code writing to reporting. Whether those mistakes matter and whether you catch them is mostly up to you. I have yet to find a model that does not make mistakes each turn. I suspect that this kind of error is fundamentally incorrigible. The most interesting thing…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others maintain that these failures reflect poor tool design rather than an inherent limitation of the models themselves &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48075252&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m suspicious of their results with regards to tool usage. It&amp;#39;s unsurprising that round-tripping long content through an LLM results in corruption. Frequent LLM users already know not to do that. They claim that tool use didn&amp;#39;t help, which surprised me... but they also said: &amp;gt; To test this, we implemented a basic agentic harness (Yao et al., 2022) with file reading, writing, and code execution tools (Appendix M). We note this is not an optimized state-of-the-art agent system; future work could…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48075785&quot; title=&quot;If you’re using LLMs for agentic work it is absolutely essential that you have a robust set of tools for them to use and the correct instructions to prompt their use. The LLM will come up with stupid ways to do things, common sense doesn’t exist for AI.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sundaicity.com/blogs/getting-arrested-in-japan&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Getting arrested in Japan&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sundaicity.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48078647&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;243 points · &lt;strong&gt;300 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by bane&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This firsthand account details the harsh reality of Japan’s detention system, where suspects can be held for 23 days or longer under extreme psychological pressure, rigid rules, and poor living conditions designed to extract confessions before formal charges are even filed. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sundaicity.com/blogs/getting-arrested-in-japan&quot; title=&quot;Title: ARRESTED IN JAPAN INSIDE A JAPANESE DETENTION FACILITY — SUNDAiCiTY    URL Source: https://sundaicity.com/blogs/getting-arrested-in-japan    Published Time: 2026-03-29T00:22:28-0700    Markdown Content:  # ARRESTED IN JAPAN INSIDE A JAPANESE DETENTION FACILITY — SUNDAiCiTY    [0](https://sundaicity.com/cart)    [Skip to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the harsh conditions of Japan&amp;#39;s detention system, with some users arguing that the lack of civil rights and psychological pressure are &amp;#34;barbaric&amp;#34; regardless of the suspect&amp;#39;s alleged crime &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48079795&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s frustrating to try to interpret these stories with a lot of writing and video describing everything except the crucial detail about what the charges were for. Is it really a crucial detail though? As someone having lived in Japan for a long time, I see no reason why we can not discuss the fact that civil rights and detention treatment in Japan are lacking without resorting to &amp;#39;Do they deserve it in light of what they were suspected for?&amp;#39;. I personally see no reason why suspects can not…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48080266&quot; title=&quot;It doesn&amp;#39;t matter what her charge was.  Even (alleged/suspected) serial murderers and rapists should be treated humanely and not experience psychological torture. And also remember this treatment is at the point where they haven&amp;#39;t been charged with anything, haven&amp;#39;t been tried in court, and haven&amp;#39;t been convicted. The US&amp;#39;s justice system is certainly lacking in many, many ways, but wow, this is barbaric.  And it&amp;#39;s designed for one thing: high conviction rates, regardless of guilt or innocence.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others criticize the author for omitting the specific charges, suggesting that context is &amp;#34;critical&amp;#34; to determining if the treatment was disproportionate, especially given Japan&amp;#39;s success in maintaining low crime and drug rates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48079125&quot; title=&quot;Seems like it&amp;#39;s not pleasant, and the author says in theory it could be as low of a bar as getting into a heated argument; but the author never discloses his actual charge, which I think is critical context. If he stabbed someone and got this treatment, it would be very different than if he had a loud but normal argument you might see in any big box store in the US. That he doesn&amp;#39;t go on to protest why he got locked up makes me think it was something more serious. Some time ago (can&amp;#39;t easily…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48079748&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; somebody else sent her a package with something illegal in it that she didn&amp;#39;t ask for. &amp;gt; She also mentioned it was &amp;#39;the most normal type of thing you can think of&amp;#39;; This doesn&amp;#39;t really answer the question, though. It&amp;#39;s frustrating to try to interpret these stories with a lot of writing and video describing everything except the crucial detail about what the charges were for. I don&amp;#39;t think she&amp;#39;s trying to withhold information to avoid contaminating the case because she&amp;#39;s spilling other details…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48079267&quot; title=&quot;100% this -- westerners love to criticize Japan&amp;#39;s justice system, while ignoring the fact that much of it actually works . Drugs? Petty crime? Homelessness? No other country comes close to managing these problems as well as Japan does, and Japan somehow manages to do this without descending into a 1984-esque surveillance state. Wander the streets of Tokyo at night and you will see zero drug-addicted homeless people. How many western cities could one say that about?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view these strict measures as the &amp;#34;true cost&amp;#34; of a disciplined society, others point out that extended detention without indictment is also a documented issue in Western systems like the United States &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48079077&quot; title=&quot;Holy shit this is horrible. It really shows the true cost of having a disciplined public society. People love to hate on SF, and the homelessness. But I think it’s a society that prioritizes individual freedom which allows for both this outcome and the entrepreneurial environment we see.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48079177&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Language barrier: Forced to communicate only in Japanese The arrogance of American tourists is truly boundless. How dare Japanese people not speak English! Who do they think they are? &amp;gt; Food: Small, plain  AWFUL meals with no choices, no snacks, nothing extra      &amp;gt; Sleep disruption: Bright lights, strict schedules, constant noise, uncomfortable bedding, never being fully rested      &amp;gt; Mental exhaustion: Long, empty days with nothing to do but sit and wait to be interrogated or yelled at for…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cyberinsider.com/grapheneos-fixes-android-vpn-leak-google-refused-to-patch/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GrapheneOS fixes Android VPN leak Google refused to patch&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cyberinsider.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48075144&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;339 points · 125 comments · by Georgelemental&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GrapheneOS has released an update to fix an Android 16 vulnerability that leaks a user&amp;#39;s real IP address by bypassing VPN protections. While Google declined to patch the flaw, GrapheneOS neutralized the leak by disabling a specific QUIC connection optimization in its latest security release. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cyberinsider.com/grapheneos-fixes-android-vpn-leak-google-refused-to-patch/&quot; title=&quot;Title: GrapheneOS fixes Android VPN leak Google refused to patch    URL Source: https://cyberinsider.com/grapheneos-fixes-android-vpn-leak-google-refused-to-patch/    Published Time: 2026-05-06T14:13:12+00:00    Markdown Content:  # GrapheneOS fixes Android VPN leak Google refused to patch | CyberInsider    *   [Skip to main content](https://cyberinsider.com/grapheneos-fixes-android-vpn-leak-google-refused-to-patch/#genesis-content)  *   [Skip to after header…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights frustration over Google’s refusal to classify VPN leaks as security flaws, with users arguing that exempting system processes from VPN routing undermines the core purpose of the service &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48075924&quot; title=&quot;I know there are bad business reasons, but how can someone classify a VPN leak as &amp;#39;not a security issue&amp;#39; and keep their pride?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48076052&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Because system_server operates with elevated networking privileges and is exempt from VPN routing restrictions So a VPN isn&amp;#39;t a VPN on Android? Regardless of this bug. Do other locked down operating systems act the same?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find GrapheneOS essential for escaping &amp;#34;spyware&amp;#34; in stock Android, others criticize its complex UX and reliance on multiple package managers compared to alternatives like LineageOS &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077632&quot; title=&quot;I bought a used Pixel 6 for cheap to try out grapheneos. Can&amp;#39;t say I like it. UX of lineageos is much better. There is a weird russian doll kind of situation with the package managers going on. There is one builtin &amp;#39;App Store&amp;#39; with only a few basis programs, one of which is another package manager, accrescent, which offers a few more apps, but still not comprehensive at all, so another package manager is needed for which grapheneos people seem to favor obtainium over f-droid, which I find is…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48076416&quot; title=&quot;Stock Android is spyware and adware, back in the day we called such software malicious and removed it, now it&amp;#39;s the default.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. For those seeking to switch, participants suggest buying older or used Pixel models to mitigate high costs, though they warn that certain carrier-locked versions, particularly from Verizon, cannot be bootloader-unlocked for installation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077004&quot; title=&quot;Side question: what&amp;#39;s a good way of getting a GrapheneOS phone? I have been interested in using GrapheneOS but hesitant about actually getting a Pixel phone. Used phone prices are usually &amp;gt;$300 even for &amp;#39;a&amp;#39; series unless I go back several generations. Whether the device bootloader can be unlocked is also a question. I am definitely not ready to spend $449 on a new Pixel 10a.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077100&quot; title=&quot;Don&amp;#39;t buy Pixel 10a, 9a is almost exactly the same thing and still sold new.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48076322&quot; title=&quot;Sadly, Verizon Pixel phones, even after carrier unlocking, seem to be forever blocked from using GrapheneOS.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://reclaimthenet.org/france-moves-to-break-encrypted-messaging&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;France moves to break encrypted messaging&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (reclaimthenet.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48078811&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;272 points · 130 comments · by Cider9986&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;France&amp;#39;s parliamentary intelligence delegation has recommended breaking end-to-end encryption on platforms like WhatsApp and Signal, proposing &amp;#34;ghost participant&amp;#34; technology to grant authorities targeted access to private messages despite warnings from experts about creating systemic security vulnerabilities. &lt;a href=&quot;https://reclaimthenet.org/france-moves-to-break-encrypted-messaging&quot; title=&quot;Title: France Moves to Break Encrypted Messaging    URL Source: https://reclaimthenet.org/france-moves-to-break-encrypted-messaging    Published Time: 2026-05-06T14:53:14+00:00    Markdown Content:  France’s intelligence delegation in parliament has formally backed breaking the encryption that protects WhatsApp, Signal, and Telegram conversations, recommending that magistrates and intelligence agents be granted what lawmakers describe as targeted access to messages that platforms currently cannot read…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on why French citizens appear less resistant to anti-encryption laws, with some suggesting a lack of technical literacy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48079317&quot; title=&quot;I find it fascinating that a country with citizens that are typically willing to protest in the streets at the drop of a hat don&amp;#39;t seem to care.  Is it that they aren&amp;#39;t technically literate?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; while others argue that governments simply wear down public resistance through repeated attempts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48079472&quot; title=&quot;These sorts of laws have repeatedly failed to pass in Europe due to people protesting. The government just keeps coming back and trying again it seems. What makes you think French citizens don’t care?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48080104&quot; title=&quot;I do think they care but you hit on a point. Governments just keep trying to force this and eventually wear down the resistance to it. They can try repeatedly as it only has to work once.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters debate the technical security of specific apps, noting that Telegram is not end-to-end encrypted by default and WhatsApp fails to encrypt metadata &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48079200&quot; title=&quot;This article incorrectly implies that Telegram is end-to-end encrypted, by putting it in the same line as WhatsApp and Signal. Telegram doesn&amp;#39;t even try to be end-to-end-encrypted by default. WhatsApp claims to be end-to-end-encrypted, but it&amp;#39;s not open-source, Signal is end-to-end-encrypted.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48079677&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; WhatsApp claims to be end-to-end-encrypted, but it&amp;#39;s not open-source And explicitly does not encrypt metadata. Meanwhile NSA top brass publicly stated, &amp;#39;We kill people based on metadata.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Some participants believe only a high-profile disaster involving weakened encryption will shift public opinion, as criminals will likely pivot to more sophisticated methods like steganography regardless of the law &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48080021&quot; title=&quot;Seems to me we&amp;#39;re going to have to let the anti-encryption mob have their way until things go wrong—bigtime. No amount of expert advice will convince them until they witness firsthand the negative consequences of weakening encryption. It&amp;#39;s only afterwards and as a consequence some highly   newsworthy disasters occur such as a child abduction or political sex scandal involving a high profile politician come to light that the lay public will get the message that weak encryption is effectively no…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://zed.dev/theme-builder&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Zed Editor Theme-Builder&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (zed.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48076651&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;271 points · 79 comments · by cuechan&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Zed Industries has launched a desktop-only Theme Builder that allows users to visually customize and export color schemes for the Zed editor. &lt;a href=&quot;https://zed.dev/theme-builder&quot; title=&quot;Title: Theme Builder    URL Source: https://zed.dev/theme-builder    Markdown Content:  Theme Builder — Zed    [](https://zed.dev/)    *   Product  *   Resources  *   [Extensions](https://zed.dev/extensions)  *   [Docs](https://zed.dev/docs)  *   [Business](https://zed.dev/business)  *   [Pricing](https://zed.dev/pricing)    *   P    *   [Sign up S](https://zed.dev/sign_up)  *   [Download D](https://zed.dev/download)    ## Theme Builder is Desktop-only    To fully utilize Zed&amp;#39;s theme builder, access it from the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While users praise Zed&amp;#39;s performance and responsiveness, many find the default themes &amp;#34;dull&amp;#34; and low-contrast, making the new theme-builder a welcome addition for those seeking visual parity with VS Code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48076989&quot; title=&quot;This feels shallow, but one of the biggest things keeping me from using zed is the lack of a good default dark theme. The defaults all feel very low contrast, gray on gray that makes the experience feel dull and off putting to me, even if the editor itself is great.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077143&quot; title=&quot;Zed is &amp;#39;almost there&amp;#39; for me. The theme builder is good and easy to use, and I only needed a few minutes to make my own. Syntax coloring is almost there, but still lacking (I use C/C++)  Small visual adjustment like line height in the UI text is not configurable enough (only two settings) Scrolling should have a smooth option, nothing prevents it, it should be super easy to add, I find it easier on the eyes when I move around code, especially on a 240Hz monitor. The editing experience is good,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077173&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m extremely glad to see something like this. I&amp;#39;ve tried to use Zed so many times, and this might sound neurotic -- but there are just so many little theming things that make a difference to me. For example, https://imgur.com/a/ia2GCgg -- top is VSCode, bottom is Zed. Both using Svelte, and using a similar theme. - Angle brackets are a different color - Capitalized built-in components are a different color - Boolean props are a different color - Brackets are colored differently than text. The…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant debate exists regarding scrolling; some argue that smooth scrolling is a basic necessity for mouse and keyboard users, while others contend that clickwheels are &amp;#34;legacy technology&amp;#34; and that trackpads already provide a smooth experience &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077143&quot; title=&quot;Zed is &amp;#39;almost there&amp;#39; for me. The theme builder is good and easy to use, and I only needed a few minutes to make my own. Syntax coloring is almost there, but still lacking (I use C/C++)  Small visual adjustment like line height in the UI text is not configurable enough (only two settings) Scrolling should have a smooth option, nothing prevents it, it should be super easy to add, I find it easier on the eyes when I move around code, especially on a 240Hz monitor. The editing experience is good,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077721&quot; title=&quot;Scrolling is perfectly smooth when you use a trackpad. IMO, clickwheels are a legacy technology for scrolling (even when I use Windows, I left-hand a Magic Trackpad so I still have smooth analog scrolling).&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077862&quot; title=&quot;I never liked trackpad. I am an avid RTS player, the mouse is by far the superious input device. Besides, I never work on a laptop. And this is a lame excuse. Smooth scrolling should also work when using keyboard with and pageup/pagedown, at least as an option and with some tuning preferences.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48078136&quot; title=&quot;The arrow keys do scroll smoothly in Safari from my testing, but a clickwheel does not. Probably because scrolling inputs are meant to be precise.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, some developers feel the editor is &amp;#34;almost there&amp;#34; but still lacks granular UI configuration and mature syntax highlighting for specific languages like C++ and Svelte &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077143&quot; title=&quot;Zed is &amp;#39;almost there&amp;#39; for me. The theme builder is good and easy to use, and I only needed a few minutes to make my own. Syntax coloring is almost there, but still lacking (I use C/C++)  Small visual adjustment like line height in the UI text is not configurable enough (only two settings) Scrolling should have a smooth option, nothing prevents it, it should be super easy to add, I find it easier on the eyes when I move around code, especially on a 240Hz monitor. The editing experience is good,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077173&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m extremely glad to see something like this. I&amp;#39;ve tried to use Zed so many times, and this might sound neurotic -- but there are just so many little theming things that make a difference to me. For example, https://imgur.com/a/ia2GCgg -- top is VSCode, bottom is Zed. Both using Svelte, and using a similar theme. - Angle brackets are a different color - Capitalized built-in components are a different color - Boolean props are a different color - Brackets are colored differently than text. The…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48078369&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s been a while, but from what I remember you need that extension for any highlighting at all, and that screenshot is with it installed. Also, if I recall, it&amp;#39;s something about that extension using an outdated treesitter parser or something along those lines.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/nooga/let-go&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: I made a Clojure-like language in Go, boots in 7ms&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48076815&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;253 points · 80 comments · by marcingas&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let-go is a new Clojure-like language written in Go that features a 7ms cold boot time, a 10MB static binary, and seamless embedding within Go programs for building CLIs and web servers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/nooga/let-go&quot; title=&quot;Let-go is a Clojure-like language (~90% compatible with JVM Clojure) written in pure Go. It ships as a ~10MB static binary and cold boots in ~7ms - that&amp;amp;#x27;s about 50x faster than JVM and 3x faster than Babashka. It has decent throughput on algorithmic workloads - within ballpark of the GraalVM-backed sci.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;I started this project in 2021 as an elaborate practical joke: I wanted to have an excuse for writing Clojure while pretending to write Go.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Jokes aside, it turned out to be pretty…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the project&amp;#39;s README, which several users criticized for being &amp;#34;AI-slopped&amp;#34; and off-putting compared to the original version &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48079874&quot; title=&quot;absolutely sick of reading through obviously AI-slopped READMEs. it&amp;#39;s your project, take a little pride and tell me why i should like it quickly instead of asking your agent to rattle off a list of features -- it&amp;#39;s severely boring &amp;amp; offputting.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48080023&quot; title=&quot;apologies if i was blunt - readme sloppage is a particular annoyance of mine that is quickly becoming common. i&amp;#39;m not against vibecoding, far from it. but a readme is a part of a project that humans immediately touch - seeing it littered with em-dashes signals carelessness. i appreciate you taking my feedback with grace.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48080060&quot; title=&quot;Why did you feel the need to slopify your README? The original version read much, much better. I genuinely don’t understand why people do this.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The author acknowledged the feedback and provided a link to the pre-AI documentation, noting that the project&amp;#39;s core value is outlined in the original HN post &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48079971&quot; title=&quot;Thanks for feedback. Here&amp;#39;s a pre-AI-slopped README https://github.com/nooga/let-go/blob/98c2e2ebf38519bceb4f799... You can also refer to the HN post itself - it says why I think it&amp;#39;s cool.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the controversy over the presentation, some users expressed excitement for a Clojure-like language built on Go&amp;#39;s channel abstractions and binary distribution &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48079008&quot; title=&quot;This is the kind of clojure port that I always was looking for. Mostly because I thought go&amp;#39;s core library and channels abstractions hits a simpler/nicer base API which would with the core &amp;amp; async apis (not to mention scratches my big beautiful binary itch) Thanks for your work will definitely check it out again once I get over renewed love for cpp (26) Edit how did glojure go under my radar also a great project from the looks&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, while others compared the project to Glojure, an existing implementation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48078923&quot; title=&quot;do you know about Glojure? https://github.com/glojurelang/glojure&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48078946&quot; title=&quot;Yes, I know about this one. I&amp;#39;m even comparing against it in my benchmarks :)&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-26:13.exec.asc&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Local privilege escalation via execve()&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (freebsd.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077971&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;218 points · 101 comments · by Deeg9rie9usi&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FreeBSD has released a security advisory for a critical kernel bug in the execve(2) system call that could allow unprivileged local users to obtain superuser privileges via a buffer overflow. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-26:13.exec.asc&quot; title=&quot;Title:     URL Source: https://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-26:13.exec.asc    Published Time: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 18:40:00 GMT    Markdown Content:  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----  Hash: SHA512    =============================================================================  FreeBSD-SA-26:13.exec                                       Security Advisory                                                            The FreeBSD Project    Topic:          Local privilege escalation via…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discovery of a local privilege escalation (LPE) vulnerability in FreeBSD’s `execve()` syscall has sparked debate over the inherent risks of aging C-based monolithic kernels &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48078384&quot; title=&quot;Just yesterday, cperciva was bragging about the FreeBSD approach to security: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48056853 You can certainly argue the response here was well-coordinated, but having an LPE in a nearly 50-year old core syscall like execve() isn&amp;#39;t ideal from a security perspective.  (That is: security response isn&amp;#39;t the entire picture; culture and bug surface matter too.)&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48078227&quot; title=&quot;Anyone relying on a 30+ year old monolith kernel written in C to not have some exploitable LPEs lurking should stay in basket weaving and out of sysadmin.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While the issue was patched in April, users noted that the lack of a workaround beyond a full system reboot remains a significant hurdle for certain production environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48078081&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; IV.  Workaround &amp;gt; No workaround is available. Oh dear.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48078259&quot; title=&quot;This is from April 28th, it was patched in 15.0R-p7.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48078184&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; V.   Solution &amp;gt; Upgrade your vulnerable system to a supported FreeBSD stable or  release / security branch (releng) dated after the correction date,  and reboot the system. Not everyone can just freebsd-update and reboot, so yes, &amp;#39;Oh dear.&amp;#39; is a good response to this.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights a cultural divide, with some arguing that BSD&amp;#39;s security reputation is often overstated by &amp;#34;countercultural&amp;#34; users, whereas others maintain that no modern OS is immune to such lineage-based bugs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48078630&quot; title=&quot;A not-insignificant chunk of the userbase of the various BSDs is there because they were turned off of Linux after controversial things like Gnome 3, systemd being shoved down users&amp;#39; throats despite being a broken mess, wayland (though nobody was as arrogant about wayland as Poettering was about systemd), etc. All that to say, the BSD userbase as a sizeable subset that are there for countercultural reasons, rather than technical.  These are the people who buy into, say, OpenBSD&amp;#39;s vaunted…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48078293&quot; title=&quot;Yep. You should treat any system where non-admins regularly login as basically insecure/owned and rig your architecture appropriately. TBH -- I don&amp;#39;t have any of these kinds of boxes anymore. Who is really running anything like this in 2026 and for what purpose?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mccue.dev/pages/5-8-26-ai-art&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;People Hate AI Art&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mccue.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070548&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;138 points · &lt;strong&gt;168 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by 3dedb728-3f77&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that using AI-generated art signals low social literacy and damages one&amp;#39;s reputation, suggesting that users instead opt for human-made alternatives like simple doodles, &amp;#34;lazy&amp;#34; photo edits, or professional commissions to avoid being perceived as a grifter. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mccue.dev/pages/5-8-26-ai-art&quot; title=&quot;Title: People Hate AI Art    URL Source: https://mccue.dev/pages/5-8-26-ai-art    Markdown Content:  # People Hate AI Art    # People Hate AI Art     by: **Ethan McCue**     There&amp;#39;s a vivid mental image I have in my head of a T-Rex giving a thumbs up.   So I had ChatGPT generate that for me.    ![Image 1](https://mccue.dev/pages/5-8-26-dinosaur-ai.png)    If your initial reaction to reading that and seeing that is some variation of &amp;#39;ughhh&amp;#39; or rolling your eyes or &amp;#39;fuck this guy&amp;#39; congrats. You are normal.    If…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on whether the backlash against AI art is a widespread sentiment or merely a &amp;#34;vocal minority&amp;#34; of online critics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071326&quot; title=&quot;Corrected: a certain type of very loud and very online person in your audience hates AI art and thinks less of you for using it. But that doesn&amp;#39;t matter, because the game theory they outlined is directionally right. The cohort of people who hate AI art is relatively small. But the cohort of people who love it is even smaller. People can generally spot it, and most people are indifferent to it. Having said that: I think it&amp;#39;s also true that people are generally indifferent to any of the &amp;#39;casual&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071400&quot; title=&quot;This trend of “everybody hates AI!” articles from bluesky people is becoming really tiresome. Every week it’s a new variant on that theme, and never substantiated. Major yawn.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071170&quot; title=&quot;It seems like there might be just a small vocal minority that hates AI art. Most people probably don’t care. I bet there were painters in the 1800s who talked about how people hated photographs and how they were uncanny and creepy compared to paintings.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that the technology follows a historical pattern of initial public rejection before eventual acceptance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071308&quot; title=&quot;List of things that the public despised when they were new: - Cars (expensive toys for the rich that endangered normal ppl and spooked horses) - Recorded music (similar complaints about it not supporting artists) - Bicycles (commonly called the devil&amp;#39;s work) - Novels (morally dangerous) - Headphones / Sony Walkman (anti-social) I remember when chatting online was nerdy, anti-social, and uncool. Now celebrities casually talk about sliding into each other&amp;#39;s DMs. The initial &amp;#39;it&amp;#39;s unfashionable&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that AI-generated images currently serve as a low-quality &amp;#34;crutch&amp;#34; similar to clip art &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071326&quot; title=&quot;Corrected: a certain type of very loud and very online person in your audience hates AI art and thinks less of you for using it. But that doesn&amp;#39;t matter, because the game theory they outlined is directionally right. The cohort of people who hate AI art is relatively small. But the cohort of people who love it is even smaller. People can generally spot it, and most people are indifferent to it. Having said that: I think it&amp;#39;s also true that people are generally indifferent to any of the &amp;#39;casual&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071236&quot; title=&quot;Most “AI art” is art like “clip art” is art. This is a phase that will pass. There will be (and already are) legitimate artists who leverage AI as a creative tool like any other medium/tool (Photoshop, cameras, paint brushes, etc). I respect them even if others immediately dismiss anything AI related.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071636&quot; title=&quot;Clip art is actual art, unlike AI “art”.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the controversy, some users find value in AI as a creative tool for personal storytelling, UI mockups, or artistic filters &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071253&quot; title=&quot;People hate AI compositions, especially from a publication. There are many valid uses for AI image generators. My nieces and I have a blast coming up with stories and illustrating them with generated images. It is even better when they hallucinate an extra finger or ear, we can work it into the story. I also like to use AI as a sort of filter on pictures that I took. Make a photo look like a drawing, for example. It is also incredible for UI mockups and saves me a lot of work.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071234&quot; title=&quot;I think one of the reasons for sloppy images is that non-artistic people don&amp;#39;t have the vocabulary to describe images to be produced in interesting styles. Yes, you can do image-&amp;gt; text on existing styles, but something always gets lost in translation. Midjourney probably has the best baseline, and --sref is a really easy way to differentiate&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, though concerns remain regarding the economic impact on human creators &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071250&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t always hate AI products, I do hate an economy with no work for creative people.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/08/Over_97_of_the_Linux_Foundation_s_Budget_Goes_Not_to_Linux.shtml&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Over 97% of the &amp;#39;Linux&amp;#39; Foundation&amp;#39;s Budget Goes Not to Linux&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techrights.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071496&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;163 points · 106 comments · by esaym&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Foundation&amp;#39;s 2025 annual report reveals that less than 3% of its $310 million budget is spent on the Linux kernel, sparking criticism over mission creep and the organization&amp;#39;s shift toward promoting cloud and AI technologies. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/08/Over_97_of_the_Linux_Foundation_s_Budget_Goes_Not_to_Linux.shtml&quot; title=&quot;Title: Over 97% of the &amp;#39;Linux&amp;#39; Foundation&amp;#39;s Budget Goes Not to Linux    URL Source: https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/08/Over_97_of_the_Linux_Foundation_s_Budget_Goes_Not_to_Linux.shtml    Published Time: Fri, 08 May 2026 09:35:06 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Techrights — Over 97% of the &amp;#39;Linux&amp;#39; Foundation&amp;#39;s Budget Goes Not to Linux    [![Image 1: Bonum Certa Men Certa](https://techrights.org/images/header-pillars.jpg)](https://techrights.org/)    *   [Home](https://techrights.org/index.shtml)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users find the Linux Foundation&amp;#39;s executive compensation shocking &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071703&quot; title=&quot;The executive compensation is pretty shocking https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/460...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that the 97% figure is misleading because the organization has evolved into a massive &amp;#34;BlackRock of the digital world,&amp;#34; supporting critical infrastructure like Kubernetes, PyTorch, and NodeJS &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072028&quot; title=&quot;Reading through the list of projects that the Linux Foundation supports (via infrastructure, governance, events, etc) with the other 181 million is honestly shocking. They are supporting, among like a thousand others - NodeJS/OpenJS, PyTorch, Electron, K8s, vLLM, ONNX, PX4, GraphQL - plus the &amp;#39;smaller&amp;#39; entries like Zephyr, Containerd, gRPC, KiCAD, ESLint, Fastify, etc. Their portfolio is literally insane. This is the BlackRock of the entire digital world.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071779&quot; title=&quot;Without bending over backwards to defend the Linux Foundation, I&amp;#39;ll point out that the 97% number means very little -- the percentage that actually matters is the percentage that doesn&amp;#39;t go towards funding open source at all . The Linux Foundation hasn&amp;#39;t been solely about Linux for decades; they are (facially) responsible for hosting a very large number of open source projects.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant debate regarding Linus Torvalds’ $1.5M salary; some view it as modest compared to his massive global impact &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071854&quot; title=&quot;Actually crazy that Linus just takes home 1.5M per year for one of the largest contributions to tech of anyone in the world. Obviously nobody needs more than that per year, but this pay is 1/100 or 1/1000th of many tech executives that have contributed very little comparatively.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, while others use it to debate the merits of wealth caps and intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072381&quot; title=&quot;A wealth tax than caps one&amp;#39;s inflow to something like a million a year makes a lot of sense. To all the billionaire sympathizers who worry about incentives and technological progress, this here is a perfect (and not the only) example of how intrinsic motivation can beat extrinsic motivation by a huge margin. There will always be people who value intrinsic incentives and even more so when there is a lack or limitation of extrinsic ones. Society will do well to structure itself primarily around…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite criticisms of specific spending, such as 4% on blockchain, proponents note that corporate overhead remains low at roughly 5% &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071889&quot; title=&quot;8 million (~3%) towards the Linux kernel 180 million (~65%) towards ancillary project support, which includes a huge ecosystem of useful technologies around linux Their &amp;#39;corporate operations&amp;#39; overhead is like 5% of expenses. whoop.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072824&quot; title=&quot;And, 4% toward blockchain.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://adele.pages.casa/md/blog/all-my-clients-wanted-a-carousel-now-it-s-an-ai-chatbot.md&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;All my clients wanted a carousel, now it&amp;#39;s an AI chatbot&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (adele.pages.casa)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072720&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;186 points · 77 comments · by edent&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A web developer reflects on how AI chatbots have replaced carousels as the latest &amp;#34;must-have&amp;#34; website feature, serving more as a social signal of modernization than a functional tool, despite clients and users often finding them annoying or unhelpful. &lt;a href=&quot;https://adele.pages.casa/md/blog/all-my-clients-wanted-a-carousel-now-it-s-an-ai-chatbot.md&quot; title=&quot;Title: All my clients wanted a carousel, now it&amp;#39;s an AI chatbot! | Adële&amp;#39;s blog    URL Source: https://adele.pages.casa/md/blog/all-my-clients-wanted-a-carousel-now-it-s-an-ai-chatbot.md    Markdown Content:  # All my clients wanted a carousel, now it&amp;#39;s an AI chatbot! | Adële&amp;#39;s blog    **Adële&amp;#39;s blog**    *   [About](https://adele.pages.casa/md/)  *   [Blog](https://adele.pages.casa/md/blog/)  *   [Archives](https://adele.pages.casa/md/blog/?p=archives)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a shift in client demands from carousels to AI chatbots, driven more by a &amp;#34;fear of looking behind&amp;#34; and a desire for visibility than by actual utility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073173&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Then the trend quietly died, as trends do. Not because anyone decided carousels were bad. Just because something newer came along to copy. &amp;gt; [...] &amp;gt; I&amp;#39;ve started asking clients a simple question when they bring it up. Not to be difficult, just to understand. &amp;gt; [...] &amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s not about utility. It&amp;#39;s not even really about the chatbot. It&amp;#39;s about visibility, the fear of looking behind. &amp;gt; [...] &amp;gt; No pop-ups. No blinking corners. Just content, clear and immediate. It’s been long enough that this…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073116&quot; title=&quot;“It&amp;#39;s about visibility, the fear of looking behind” This sums up everything driving the tech sector right now. From execs at big tech to nobodies on X. EDIT; if I think about the nature of it. The visibility fight is the decreasing attention with increasing channels and noise. Visibility tactics go to the extreme. And the fear of looking behind comes from the previous tech cycles and the thoughts around what if you had missed those? And maybe those with the most fear are the ones that did.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant debate emerged regarding the article&amp;#39;s prose, with some users arguing it exhibits a &amp;#34;record-scratch&amp;#34; quality typical of LLM-generated content &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073173&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Then the trend quietly died, as trends do. Not because anyone decided carousels were bad. Just because something newer came along to copy. &amp;gt; [...] &amp;gt; I&amp;#39;ve started asking clients a simple question when they bring it up. Not to be difficult, just to understand. &amp;gt; [...] &amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s not about utility. It&amp;#39;s not even really about the chatbot. It&amp;#39;s about visibility, the fear of looking behind. &amp;gt; [...] &amp;gt; No pop-ups. No blinking corners. Just content, clear and immediate. It’s been long enough that this…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073389&quot; title=&quot;Have courage and trust your own instincts. Unless one is extremely disagreeable it&amp;#39;s very tempting to hedge and avoid outright saying &amp;#39;this is AI&amp;#39; just in case you&amp;#39;re wrong, but if you&amp;#39;re literate and regularly exposed to AI outputs your instincts are likely quite accurate. In this particular case the linked article is definitely AI generated.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073229&quot; title=&quot;It isn&amp;#39;t &amp;#39;clearly human-written&amp;#39; at all, the entire blog looks like LLM output, right from the very first post. I&amp;#39;m not witch-hunting, there are just a lot of witches.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend this style predates AI and that labeling it as such is dismissive &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073256&quot; title=&quot;LLMs don&amp;#39;t &amp;#39;own&amp;#39; this writing style. By definition they can&amp;#39;t - they were trained on human writing after all! People wrote like this before and that&amp;#39;s fine. You might not like the style, but saying it&amp;#39;s because LLM writing has infested their brain is wrong, dismissive and dehumanising.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073165&quot; title=&quot;Come on, this is clearly human-written  People have been writing like this for very damn long&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48074314&quot; title=&quot;OTOH I’ve had blog posts I wrote two decades ago vehemently called out as AI generated. AI generated style unfortunately means writing that tested positively in human A/B testing, now over represented in a style used largely by AI. So if you write in a way that engages the reader, you’re going to struggle not to use em dashes and the occasional a/b contrast, because those are challenging the reader to engage… but when overused, they not only don’t have the intended effect ( to break the reader…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, commenters noted that while &amp;#34;bad writing is bad writing&amp;#34; regardless of the source, the ease of generating this specific, over-optimized style has led to a proliferation that risks alienating readers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48074314&quot; title=&quot;OTOH I’ve had blog posts I wrote two decades ago vehemently called out as AI generated. AI generated style unfortunately means writing that tested positively in human A/B testing, now over represented in a style used largely by AI. So if you write in a way that engages the reader, you’re going to struggle not to use em dashes and the occasional a/b contrast, because those are challenging the reader to engage… but when overused, they not only don’t have the intended effect ( to break the reader…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073411&quot; title=&quot;Any style can cross the border into bad and get in the way of itself when it&amp;#39;s turned up to 11, no matter who wrote it. There&amp;#39;ve been stylistic fads before LLMs where a thing, with results just as chalkboard-screech-inducing as the current one. That this one is just a button-push away does make it worse, though, because it proliferates so greedily. Bad writing is bad writing, and writing like an LLM is writing like an LLM. We should be able to call this out. In fact, calling out the human…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-08</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-08</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://reclaimthenet.org/google-broke-recaptcha-for-de-googled-android-users&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Google broke reCAPTCHA for de-googled Android users&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (reclaimthenet.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48067119&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1519 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 567 comments · by anonymousiam&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google&amp;#39;s update to reCAPTCHA has reportedly broken functionality for users of &amp;#34;de-Googled&amp;#34; Android devices, effectively blocking them from accessing websites and services that rely on the security tool. &lt;a href=&quot;https://reclaimthenet.org/google-broke-recaptcha-for-de-googled-android-users&quot; title=&quot;Related: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Google Cloud fraud defense, the next evolution of reCAPTCHA&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=48039362&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=48039362&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;also: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Google Cloud Fraud Defence is just WEI repackaged&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=48063199&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=48063199&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The shift toward hardware-based remote attestation in reCAPTCHA effectively ties online activity to a device&amp;#39;s unique hardware identity, potentially destroying anonymity and allowing Google to link accounts across different services &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48067505&quot; title=&quot;My understanding is that this new reCAPTCHA is basically just remote attestation. Remote attestation doesn&amp;#39;t use blind signatures (as that would be &amp;#39;farmable&amp;#39;) so tying the device to the &amp;#39;attestee&amp;#39; is technically possible with collusion of Google servers: EK (static burned-in private key) -&amp;gt; AIK (ephemeral identity key in secure enclave signed by a Google server) -&amp;gt; attestation (signed by AIK). As you can see if the Google server logs EK -&amp;gt; AIK conversions an attestation can be trivially traced…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48069199&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t use Android right now and haven&amp;#39;t used Google&amp;#39;d Android for almost a decade. And I won&amp;#39;t. If this is the hill I die on, so be it. I&amp;#39;m not going to use any sort of hardware attestation, especially one controlled by Google. You shouldn&amp;#39;t either, even if you have an unrooted Google-certified Android phone.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. This transition has rendered many sites unusable for users of de-Googled Android or those with &amp;#34;dirty&amp;#34; IP addresses, leading to a cycle of endless loops, silent order cancellations, and total service bans &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48067454&quot; title=&quot;Sites that use reCAPTCHA/Turnstile/etc. have already been broken for me for years now due to neverending captcha/refresh loops. My ISP regularly changes everyone&amp;#39;s IP, and I apparently share an ISP with people who suck, so I get flagged just trying to do all sorts of normal things. Some examples: - I&amp;#39;ve never bought anything from Etsy but I&amp;#39;m somehow banned from even viewing their site at all. - Discord immediately bans me any time I try to create an account. - Can&amp;#39;t buy flights from Delta,…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48069181&quot; title=&quot;With the new reCAPTCHA this is going to happen because most human visitors will actually be unable to pass the CAPTCHA. It will be interesting to see whether this makes websites ditch reCAPTCHA or whether they literally just don&amp;#39;t care about having customers, an attitude that seems to be getting more and more common every day.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48069734&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve kept a spare cheap android for too long and recently went with Graphene instead. I have one Google profile and only use it for Uber, work&amp;#39;s Google Chat and maps. One bank refused to work (even with Google services) so I moved bank. I&amp;#39;ve moved most of my mobile use to self hosted (freshrss full text, password manager, calendar, tasks) with no direct internet connection. It&amp;#39;s a bit irritating but I&amp;#39;m glad I started down this journey because it looks more and more like I&amp;#39;m going to be…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users advocate for boycotting these services or seeking regulatory intervention, others fear this trend will soon expand to desktop OSes, making TPM chips a mandatory requirement for basic web browsing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48068826&quot; title=&quot;Stop visiting sites and using services that use reCAPTCHA. Problem solved.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48069265&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s all fun until you can&amp;#39;t get paid because some fintech app doesn&amp;#39;t work. That&amp;#39;s why we need regulations. I don&amp;#39;t see politicians ever going against an advertising company when they&amp;#39;re customers.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48068176&quot; title=&quot;And soon desktop OSes will follow, if you don’t have TPM you won’t be able to browse half of the internet.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://apnews.com/article/poland-economy-growth-g20-gdp-26fe06e120398410f8d773ba5661e7aa&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Poland is now among the 20 largest economies&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (apnews.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48062117&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1044 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 856 comments · by surprisetalk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Three decades after the fall of communism left the nation in economic ruin, Poland has risen to become the world&amp;#39;s 20th largest economy. &lt;a href=&quot;https://apnews.com/article/poland-economy-growth-g20-gdp-26fe06e120398410f8d773ba5661e7aa&quot; title=&quot;Poland is now among the world&amp;#39;s 20 largest economies. How it happened    Poland once was in economic ruins when communism fell more than three decades ago. Now it&amp;#39;s the 20th largest economy in the world.    [![AP Logo](https://assets.apnews.com/19/66/bc546486408c8595f01753a9fbeb/ap-logo-176-by-208.svg)](/)    Menu    * [World](https://apnews.com/world-news)      SECTIONS      [Iran war](https://apnews.com/hub/iran)    [Russia-Ukraine war](https://apnews.com/hub/russia-ukraine)   …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Poland&amp;#39;s rise to a top-20 economy is attributed to its successful transition from a Soviet satellite state through &amp;#34;shock therapy&amp;#34; and strategic EU integration &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48064871&quot; title=&quot;The story is longer: Poland was the first country to make a remarkable peaceful transition from a bankrupt, failed Soviet satellite state. The shock therapy, plus NATO and EU aspirations, paved the way. It is a story of a country that made a lot of the right decisions along the way. Managed to keep consistent high growth, not a pony trick or boom/bust mode. Poland should be a role model for many other countries. Recommend a book: https://www.amazon.com/Europes-Growth-Champion-Insights-Econ...…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48064992&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Poland was the first country to make a remarkable peaceful transition from a bankrupt, failed Soviet satellite state. In what sense? Czechia is richer per capita. Almost all of the former Soviet satellite states in eastern Europe have had largely peaceful (since 1991) sustained economic growth. The exceptions are exactly those countries which continue to have Russian troops occupying portions, namely Belarus, Ukraine, and Moldova.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the growth is overly dependent on EU structural funds and foreign corporations seeking cheap, educated labor &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48062558&quot; title=&quot;I love the polish, but credit where credit is due: „Poland is the largest beneficiary of EU funds 2014-2020, with one in four euro going to Poland“ https://www.gov.pl/web/funds-regional-policy/poland-at-the-f... Update:  The comments below this are strange. I ment: „Poland gets money, Poland transforms it into more money”. Is Poland more efficient in it than other countries?  I do not know.  Would Poland have generated less money without it ? Probably?  Is an annual investment of the 2-3%of the GDP…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065760&quot; title=&quot;I live in Poland. This headline is misleading. Poland didn&amp;#39;t build a top-20 economy. Western Europe and the US built their economy in Poland, because the labor is educated and cheap. There are almost no globally competitive Polish companies. The &amp;#39;growth&amp;#39; is branch offices of German and American corporations taking advantage of engineers who&amp;#39;ll work for 40% of Berlin rates. Remove the foreign-owned sector and you&amp;#39;re looking at a mid-tier economy running on EU structural funds. It&amp;#39;s a great place…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that Poland is actually a low net recipient of EU funds per capita and has developed high-tech manufacturing niches like robotics and precision motors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48062696&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;re also the 3rd smallest net recipient of EU funds per capita: https://i.imgur.com/VlRkDMy.png&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063116&quot; title=&quot;Years ago I bought some really nice brushless motors and was surprised to see they were made in Poland. I had no idea they were manufacturers of things like that. Later I bought even nicer motors, meant to provide exceptional control and feedback for tactile/haptic behaviours, and they were from Poland too. Then I got to work on a robotic arm which contained a bunch of components from Poland. At this point it was clear to me that it wasn’t coincidence. Finally, I built a drone with my kids and…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, the consensus highlights a virtuous cycle where EU investments and free movement have fostered a motivated workforce, benefiting the broader European economy and regional stability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48062895&quot; title=&quot;Think of it as an investment. The rest of the EU also benefits from their hard work, and economic prosperity. Other countries in the EU have also enjoyed economic growth and support over the years. I&amp;#39;m old enough to remember internal borders with passport checks in Europe, before the wall fell and Poland was still on the other side of that. Nice to see them moving on from that. Thanks to the EU free movement of people, I&amp;#39;ve now studied, worked and lived in four different countries. I know…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48062352&quot; title=&quot;Educated AND motivated workforce will do the trick. All the polish I know that work in IT enjoy handwork as well. They are hard workers.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48062585&quot; title=&quot;Yes, this is how European social welfare works. And it is fantastic! Because the entirety of the EU is benefitting from it. Polish people have larger spending power, interesting and safe places to visit, etc. This is not a &amp;#39;present&amp;#39; given to Poland. This is ensuring a better life for all Europeans.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://privatecaptcha.com/blog/google-cloud-fraud-defence-wei/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Google Cloud Fraud Defence is just WEI repackaged&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (privatecaptcha.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063199&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;701 points · 360 comments · by ribtoks&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google has launched &amp;#34;Google Cloud Fraud Defense,&amp;#34; a reCAPTCHA evolution that critics claim repackages the rejected Web Environment Integrity proposal to enforce hardware attestation and device tracking on the open web. &lt;a href=&quot;https://privatecaptcha.com/blog/google-cloud-fraud-defence-wei/&quot; title=&quot;Google Cloud Fraud Defence is just WEI repackaged    In May 2026, Google announced “Google Cloud Fraud Defense - the next evolution of reCAPTCHA.” The announcement described a QR code challenge where users scan a    [![logo](/images/pc-logo-dark.svg)](/)    * Use cases    + [Form protection](/use-case/form-protection/)    + [GDPR compliance](/use-case/gdpr-compliance/)    + [Secure WordPress](/use-case/secure-wordpress/)    + [Rate limiting](/use-case/rate-limiting/)    +…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely view Google’s &amp;#34;Fraud Defence&amp;#34; as a malicious expansion of control over the open internet, framing it as a repackaging of the controversial Web Environment Integrity (WEI) proposal &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065196&quot; title=&quot;Whether it&amp;#39;s AMP or manifest 3 or android source shenanigan or attempts to replace cookies with their FLOC nonsense or this...Google is rapidly turning into a malicious force when it comes to the open internet&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065475&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; rapidly becoming Always has been. Google was creating cartels like the &amp;#39;Open Handset Alliance&amp;#39; literally decades ago. Via their control of Chrome and Search which are both monopolies, Google holds absolute authority on how websites are rendered and if websites can be found.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate whether Chrome constitutes a true monopoly given that users must often choose to install it &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066308&quot; title=&quot;It cracks me up when people say Chrome is a monopoly, because a massive amount of computing devices do not even ship with Chrome. Windows computers, Macbooks, and iPhones require users go search out and install Chrome on their own out of their own volition, shipping with entirely functional and decent browsers out of the box that they have lots of patterns to push. Even many Android phones ship with browsers other than Chrome as a default still from what I understand. How is Chrome, of all…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066894&quot; title=&quot;Outside of WebUSB I personally haven&amp;#39;t meaningfully been impacted in any ways. Can you share which ways this is? Note, this is separate from a &amp;#39;so many things are just Chromium&amp;#39;, which I agree is an issue, but isn&amp;#39;t the same as a &amp;#39; Google Chrome is a monopoly &amp;#39;. Because in the end there are still many non-Chrome browsers which support WebUSB which do not end up with a lot of the downsides of Chrome specifically about Google harvesting your data and what not.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that Google’s market share allows them to unilaterally dictate web standards that force users into their ecosystem &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065475&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; rapidly becoming Always has been. Google was creating cartels like the &amp;#39;Open Handset Alliance&amp;#39; literally decades ago. Via their control of Chrome and Search which are both monopolies, Google holds absolute authority on how websites are rendered and if websites can be found.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066470&quot; title=&quot;Chrome is a monopoly by extending the internet in ways that force users into chrome. Due to market share and Google&amp;#39;s prevalence, they have the sway to introduce things that cannot meaningfully be avoided without extreme siloing.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. A sense of inevitability pervades the discussion, with some suggesting that the rise of AI and botnets makes intrusive remote attestation unavoidable for the future of the human internet &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066454&quot; title=&quot;I saw this coming from miles away. Computers are better at solving CAPTCHAs than people are and people can be bribed or convinced to join botnets so IP whitelisting doesn&amp;#39;t work either. Now we have tons of fingerprinting and behaviour analysis but governments are cracking down on that. Plus, YouTube had a massive ad fraud problem with ads being played back in the background in embedded videos, so their detection clearly wasn&amp;#39;t good enough. There aren&amp;#39;t many good ways to prove you&amp;#39;re not a bot…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, while others call for a collective boycott in favor of open-source alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48064664&quot; title=&quot;Exactly my thoughts. I am unfathomably angry and I want to contribute to any effort to dismantle Google as a company.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48064825&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, same. It is hard; we start to need a collective boycott. We can all do our part, by using their products as little as possible, contribute to open alternatives (OpenStreetMap, Fediverse, Linux, Nextcloud...) and by stimulating our (non-techie!) friends and family. But it is a lot of work :(&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3pww9g0p5o&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;David Attenborough&amp;#39;s 100th Birthday&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48061884&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;870 points · 161 comments · by defrost&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The King and Queen led global tributes for Sir David Attenborough’s 100th birthday, marking the milestone with a special Royal Albert Hall concert and messages from public figures celebrating his century of environmental advocacy and broadcasting. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3pww9g0p5o&quot; title=&quot;Title: David Attenborough: King and Queen lead tributes for 100th birthday    URL Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3pww9g0p5o    Published Time: 2026-05-07T16:00:10.420Z    Markdown Content:  # David Attenborough: King and Queen lead tributes for 100th birthday    [Skip to content](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3pww9g0p5o#bbc-main)    Advertisement    [Watch Live](https://www.bbc.com/watch-live-news/)    [](https://www.bbc.com/)    Subscribe    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While users celebrate David Attenborough’s legacy and personal anecdotes—such as his role in making tennis balls yellow for television &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48069591&quot; title=&quot;He was just mentioned on today&amp;#39;s Lateral podcast with Tom Scott. Apparently, he&amp;#39;s the reason tennis balls are yellow. I guess they were traditionally white but when they started broadcasting matches on TV it was too hard to see the ball. David who was at the BBC at the time suggested they use yellow balls instead so they would come through on camera.  Ever since then tennis balls have been yellow.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt; and his local presence in Richmond &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48068598&quot; title=&quot;Top man, lives up on Richmond Hill and absolutely loves it - when asked about his travels and adventures and where he would choose to live, he replied, &amp;#39;I already live there&amp;#39; Fairly well-known locally is that my favourite bookshop, The Open Book in Richmond, stocks signed copies of all his books. They used to be signed directly on the page, but since he got to the mid-to-late nineties in age, tons of hardbacks are too much, so Helena wanders up there to get a load of bookplates signed these…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;—much of the discussion focuses on the environmental destruction he witnessed during his career &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066854&quot; title=&quot;The sad thing is Attenborough has lived to see the destruction of nature he loved so much. His constant warnings have gone mostly unheard. In some ways I think excellent nature programming like his own Nature is doing a disservice by making it seem like there&amp;#39;s lots of wild nature left. I wish humans would come together to re-wild more of the earth. Restoring wild nature and cutting emissions is the only way to really restore natural ecosystems. We&amp;#39;re nowhere close to doing that.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong consensus that rewilding and cutting emissions are essential, though users debate whether the primary culprit is general modern agriculture &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48068098&quot; title=&quot;Modern agriculture, both animal and non-animal versions, are bad for the environment. Artificial fertilizers, replacing forests with farm land, and drainage of wet lands are all heavily contributing to emissions and water pollution, destroying local ecosystems as well as warming the planet. Artificial fertilizers is particular bad since its production uses fossil fuels, has large amount of accidental green house emissions, and causes eutrofiering to the point of areas like the baltic sea…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt; or specifically industrial animal agriculture &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48067438&quot; title=&quot;David Attenborough saw more clearly than most what was being lost. But even he stopped short of fully applying that logic to animals themselves. Rewilding at scale, deep emissions cuts, and a serious move away from animal agriculture are the same project.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48068740&quot; title=&quot;The most impactful elements of modern agriculture are entirely animal-based. Full-stop. You in fact rightfully but incompletely recognize : artificial fertilizers (for giant mono-crop fields of soybeans to feed to cows and pigs [0]), replacing forests (to clear room for soybean fields and pasture for cows and pigs [1][2]), and runoff of these fertilizers and manure into waterways. The parent comment is right - if we want to fix these problems, we must stop killing and eating animals at such an…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Some commenters express cynicism regarding the &amp;#34;cult of capitalism&amp;#34; and its drive to make nature &amp;#34;productive&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48067141&quot; title=&quot;Sadly I don&amp;#39;t think the outlook is very positive on that. I saw an article from McKinsey about the Himalayan country of Bhutan which has famously put restrictions in place to keep the country heavily forested. Good for nature, good for preserving culture, not so great for capitalism. The article I saw basically outlined in more detail what I said above and then followed it with: &amp;#39;....but what if that forest could be made productive?&amp;#39; It&amp;#39;s rare that I want to reach through the screen and choke…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, while others argue that Attenborough’s own nature documentaries may have inadvertently masked the true extent of ecological loss &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066854&quot; title=&quot;The sad thing is Attenborough has lived to see the destruction of nature he loved so much. His constant warnings have gone mostly unheard. In some ways I think excellent nature programming like his own Nature is doing a disservice by making it seem like there&amp;#39;s lots of wild nature left. I wish humans would come together to re-wild more of the earth. Restoring wild nature and cutting emissions is the only way to really restore natural ecosystems. We&amp;#39;re nowhere close to doing that.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sinceyouarrived.world/taken&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A web page that shows you everything the browser told it without asking&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sinceyouarrived.world)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48062178&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;608 points · 292 comments · by mwheelz&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The website &amp;#34;taken.&amp;#34; demonstrates how browsers automatically volunteer sensitive data—including location, hardware specs, battery level, and installed fonts—to every site you visit, enabling &amp;#34;fingerprinting&amp;#34; to track users without cookies or consent. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sinceyouarrived.world/taken&quot; title=&quot;Title: taken.    URL Source: https://sinceyouarrived.world/taken    Markdown Content:  Since You Arrived · Vol. IV    You opened this page. It already knows the following.    reading    Where you are    North Charleston, South Carolina, United States    You appear to be in North Charleston, United States. Your internet provider is Google LLC. We know this because your IP address — 34.xxx.xxx.250 — was the first thing your device sent us. We know the rest of it. We chose not to display it. Most pages would not…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether the extensive data browsers share—such as GPU models, fonts, and timezones—constitutes a breach of privacy or is simply a fundamental aspect of how the internet functions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066764&quot; title=&quot;Maybe it&amp;#39;s just because I am old, or have worked on internet software for almost 30 years, but none of this seems surprising or even concerning? Someone sets up a server that accepts connections to it and then someone sends a connection request to it. There has been no agreement on anything, no expectations or rules established. No one forces the server to accept any connection request it gets, and no one forces someone to make a connection request to that server. What the server returns and…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48064045&quot; title=&quot;I guess I shouldn&amp;#39;t be surprised that it gives my exact GPU, but that was surprising to me.  Just so everyone knows, its an AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and I paid way too much for it during the covid/crypto price explosion when they were sold out everywhere.  Still a bit raw about that, but it is an excellent card on Linux (fedora)&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066471&quot; title=&quot;I am once again asking privacy advocates to try sounding normal for once. Trying to make a browser accessing your timezone sound nefarious isn&amp;#39;t going to convince anyone of anything.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that this data was originally intended for functional purposes and that repurposing it for fingerprinting breaks an &amp;#34;implicit agreement,&amp;#34; others maintain that users should expect no privacy when sending requests to a server &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066815&quot; title=&quot;Maybe it&amp;#39;s because I&amp;#39;m idealistic in addition to being old, but I think a lot of this functionality was in fact added for explicit purposes. A client sends the language header or the list of supported fonts not so that the server can &amp;#39;do whatever they want with this data.&amp;#39; There is (or was) a real reason for it when we came up with these standards. The fact that website providers, or more specifically ad-networks, have chosen to use these for other purposes is breaking that implicit agreement.…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066961&quot; title=&quot;I don’t understand why that would be an implicit agreement, though? Why would I expect that the website would not try to figure out who I am? They are free to remember whatever they want about my request… but I am also free to modify the request however I want, if I choose to randomize the list of fonts or choose to not send it or whatever.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics also point out that the site&amp;#39;s claim of not &amp;#34;asking&amp;#34; for data is misleading, as it relies on active lookups like geolocation APIs and JavaScript execution to gather information &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065215&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; We did not ask for your location. Your address arrived before you did. Bunk. You asked a geolocation api/service to map my ip address back to a location. You _did_ ask for my location, using my IP as a key. And my IP is pretty much required in order for communication on the internet to work (outside of using services to hide it, but then _they_ have your info instead).&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063972&quot; title=&quot;With javascript off it just stalls at &amp;#39;reading&amp;#39; forever. There are certainly some viewport properties and other things it does know even without JS execution, but the mitigation is significant. And the page itself (the JS application) cannot act on that data or communicate it. Instead it has to be processed by some other application on the backend or wherever. Not in my browser by my computer.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite inaccuracies in some reported data, users emphasize that the primary concern is the ability to create a unique fingerprint to track individuals without cookies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48064428&quot; title=&quot;* I&amp;#39;m not in that city. * It&amp;#39;s running a kind of Chrome on a kind of Linux, at a stretch. * Nobody can infer when I work and when I sleep. That includes me. * The recent, high-end display is the screen of a low-end tablet I bought in a supermarket five years ago. * But yes, browser fingerprinting is annoying. * Since you can detect light mode, would it kill you to honor it?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065369&quot; title=&quot;Whether or not the information is accurate isn&amp;#39;t really the point. It&amp;#39;s that it serves as a way to identify you even without cookies. I looked for better websites, the EFF one[0] is informative. My browser fingerprint was unique among the visitors in the past 45 days. [0] https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.war.gov/UFO/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;US Government releases first batch of UAP documents and videos&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (war.gov)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48061938&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;333 points · &lt;strong&gt;528 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by david-gpu&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The U.S. government has released its first batch of declassified documents and videos related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) as part of an ongoing federal investigation into unexplained aerial sightings. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.war.gov/UFO/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;apnews.com&amp;amp;#x2F;article&amp;amp;#x2F;trump-ufos-uap-aliens-pentagon-records-investigation-3e658d2cf3742465127c0049c872240a&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;apnews.com&amp;amp;#x2F;article&amp;amp;#x2F;trump-ufos-uap-aliens-pentagon-re...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.war.gov&amp;amp;#x2F;UFO&amp;amp;#x2F;#release&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.war.gov&amp;amp;#x2F;UFO&amp;amp;#x2F;#release&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of UAP documents is met with significant skepticism, with commenters suggesting the footage often depicts mundane objects like balloons, birds, or missiles distorted by camera artifacts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066595&quot; title=&quot;Several of these look like balloons and birds. Two of them have already leaked before. Both of those are missiles being viewed with an infrared camera. One of them shows a missile passing through the field of view rapidly with a motion blur streak behind it. The other shows a missile performing maneuvers and a camera artifact showing a star-like diffraction+aperture artifact around the bright IR light source. None of these pieces of imagery look like something doing something particularly…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48067769&quot; title=&quot;For anyone else who has a UFO-crazy uncle, I&amp;#39;ve found Mick West&amp;#39;s YouTube channel to be invaluable https://www.youtube.com/c/mickwest . Mick is a retired video game programmer (Spider Man, Guitar Hero, Tony Hawk), who does extremely well-researched videos analyzing UFO claims. He&amp;#39;s not flashy or trying to be entertaining, just thorough, evidence-based and scientifically rigorous. He&amp;#39;ll even do controlled experiments, recreations and 3D models to validate what&amp;#39;s going on. And he&amp;#39;s unfailingly…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find the structured data and specific reports—such as a metallic ellipsoid &amp;#34;materializing&amp;#34; out of light—to be intriguing for independent analysis &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063587&quot; title=&quot;This is so cool. For instance the asset FBI SEPTEMBER 2023 SIGHTING - COMPOSITE SKETCH indicated that “Actual site photo with FBI Lab rendered graphic overlay depicting corroborating eyewitness reports from September 2023 of an apparent ellipsoid bronze metallic object materializing out of a bright light in the sky, 130-195 feet in length, and disappearing instantaneously.” https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/2024-04-30-compo... I wonder if there’s satellite imagery of this event, or…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063208&quot; title=&quot;The US Department of Defense has published a CSV dataset containing UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) observation records. It appears to include structured entries that can be used for independent analysis and research. Dataset: https://www.war.gov/Portals/1/Interactive/2026/UFO/uap-csv.c... Mirror: https://gist.github.com/ahmetcadirci25/e4edb7d30109fdb8ff14b... Could be useful for anyone interested in data analysis, anomaly detection, or open government datasets.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others view the timing and &amp;#34;sci-fi&amp;#34; presentation as a calculated political distraction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066670&quot; title=&quot;So with The War having ground to an unsatisfactory halt, they&amp;#39;re now releasing distraction #2. I wonder how many will be needed between now and November? Convince me I&amp;#39;m wrong.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065727&quot; title=&quot;They really made a sci-fi themed webdesign for this. Can&amp;#39;t say that i don&amp;#39;t like it.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48061953&quot; title=&quot;Pretty cool to dig in but distraction for something else?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. To counter sensationalism, participants recommend evidence-based resources that use 3D modeling and controlled experiments to debunk popular sightings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48067769&quot; title=&quot;For anyone else who has a UFO-crazy uncle, I&amp;#39;ve found Mick West&amp;#39;s YouTube channel to be invaluable https://www.youtube.com/c/mickwest . Mick is a retired video game programmer (Spider Man, Guitar Hero, Tony Hawk), who does extremely well-researched videos analyzing UFO claims. He&amp;#39;s not flashy or trying to be entertaining, just thorough, evidence-based and scientifically rigorous. He&amp;#39;ll even do controlled experiments, recreations and 3D models to validate what&amp;#39;s going on. And he&amp;#39;s unfailingly…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48060054&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ask HN: We just had an actual UUID v4 collision...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48060054&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;448 points · 328 comments · by mittermayr&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer reported a statistically improbable UUID v4 collision within a database of only 15,000 records, raising questions about potential issues with the underlying random number generation in the &amp;#34;uuid&amp;#34; npm package. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48060054&quot; title=&quot;I know what you&amp;amp;#x27;re thinking... and I still can&amp;amp;#x27;t believe it, but...&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;This morning, our database flagged a duplicate UUID (v4). I checked, thinking it may have been a double-insert bug or something, but no.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;The original UUID was from a record added in 2025 (about a year ago), and today the system inserted a new document with a fresh UUIDv4 and it came up with the exact same one:&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;b6133fd6-70fe-4fe3-bed6-8ca8fc9386cd&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;We&amp;amp;#x27;re using…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While UUIDv4 is designed to make collisions statistically impossible, they occur in practice due to poor entropy sources, software bugs, or hardware defects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065541&quot; title=&quot;This is surprisingly common. The security of UUIDv4 is based on the assumption of a high-quality entropy source. This assumption is invalidated by hardware defects, normal software bugs, and developers not understanding what &amp;#39;high-quality entropy&amp;#39; actually means and that it is required for UUIDv4 to work as advertised. It is relatively expensive to detect when an entropy source is broken, so almost no one ever does. They find out when a collision happens, like you just did. UUIDv4 is explicitly…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Some developers mitigate this risk by implementing &amp;#34;safe&amp;#34; generation services that check for duplicates in a database, though this approach is often mocked as over-engineered and redundant &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48061235&quot; title=&quot;Funny story no one will believe, but it’s true. A good friend of mine joined a startup as CTO 10 years ago, high growth phase, maybe 200 devs… In his first week he discovered the company had a microservice for generating new UUIDs. One endpoint with its own dedicated team of 3 engineers …including a database guy (the plot thickens). Other teams were instructed to call this service every time they needed a new ‘safe’ UUID. My pal asked wtf. It turned out this service had its own DB to store…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48060510&quot; title=&quot;Please, do not use b6133fd6-70fe-4fe3-bed6-8ca8fc9386cd, I checked my database and I was using it already.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. High-reliability systems may instead favor UUIDv7, which incorporates timestamps to prevent collisions across different time windows, or utilize diverse entropy sources like CloudFlare’s lava lamps to ensure true randomness &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066506&quot; title=&quot;This is why CloudFlare has done what they did with the lava lamp wall. Not that the wall is such a great source of entropy on its own - I&amp;#39;m sure it&amp;#39;s not their only source, but you can never have too many sources of entropy - but it makes it visible in a way that can grab those who don&amp;#39;t fully understand the concepts of RNGs and how entropy plays into that. The more sources of entropy, the more closely you approach &amp;#39;perfect&amp;#39; randomization. And a large chunk of those entropy sources need to be…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066145&quot; title=&quot;The latest UUID (7?) Uses half random gen, half timestamp. This not only makes it sortable by creation, but would also make a collision like this impossible.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48067014&quot; title=&quot;If I understand it the Lava lamps are 90% PR/fun. They have a lot of other sources for entropy that scales better.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://meshtastic.org/docs/introduction/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;An Introduction to Meshtastic&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (meshtastic.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48061566&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;513 points · 185 comments · by ColinWright&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meshtastic is an open-source, community-driven project that uses inexpensive LoRa radios to create decentralized, encrypted mesh networks for long-range, off-grid text communication and GPS tracking without the need for existing infrastructure. &lt;a href=&quot;https://meshtastic.org/docs/introduction/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Introduction | Meshtastic    URL Source: https://meshtastic.org/docs/introduction/    Published Time: Sat, 09 May 2026 03:47:12 GMT    Markdown Content:  Meshtastic® is a project that enables you to use inexpensive LoRa radios as a long range off-grid communication platform in areas without existing or reliable communications infrastructure. This project is 100% community driven and open source!    ![Image 1: Client](https://flasher.meshtastic.org/img/devices/rak_wismesh_tag.svg)    Client    ![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meshtastic and Meshcore provide decentralized, LoRa-based text communication that operates without licenses or fixed infrastructure, making them popular for disaster preparedness, search and rescue, and remote group coordination &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48062388&quot; title=&quot;I had never heard of this before, then last week I watched a video about it and was hooked. Now I&amp;#39;m seeing it everywhere! Meshtastic and Meshcore are both cool LoRa-based mesh text messaging that operate in an no-license-required band. While this limits your transmit power, it doesn&amp;#39;t prohibit encryption - the inverse of most ham radio rules! Some cities have thriving communities of Meshtastic and/or Meshcore. You can look at maps of coverage to get a very general idea - in my experience, most…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063235&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; What is the use case? It&amp;#39;s primarily just an experimental system. Demonstrating that fixed infrastructure isn&amp;#39;t actually necessary to communicate. Beyond that, it&amp;#39;s a mixture of HAM radio for communicating with people outside of your immediate circle, and disaster prep. The best realistic scenario I can see for using it is after a sever weather event like hurricane, tornado, tsunami, etc. that takes out significant comms equipment. Having an ad-hoc network pop up using battery powered nodes…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066209&quot; title=&quot;People forget that this network isnt for everyday use. It is for use in ad-hoc scenarios where cell or even satellite coverage falls apart. The most powerful aspect is that these things are deployable . A communication chain can be established as fast as people can move.  Natural disasters are the most obvious use case, but more interesting are things like search and rescue. Go somewhere properly remote such as the high north. There is no cell network outside of town. And the satellite coverage…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063096&quot; title=&quot;It runs independently of internet and power. One use case is a group of people in a remote area (hikers, hunters) carrying their own node and being able to communicate via text over several kilometres.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find Meshtastic to be a &amp;#34;ghost town&amp;#34; of telemetry and prefer Meshcore for its more active communities and static routing, others view these networks as vital tools against internet censorship or for gathering intelligence in hostile environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48064811&quot; title=&quot;If you&amp;#39;re interested in Meshtastic, just try Meshcore instead. It&amp;#39;s the natural hobbiest progression. Eventually you&amp;#39;ll get tired of Meshtastic being nothing but telemetry from unknown nodes, nobody talks, it&amp;#39;s a ghost town of weak links. Meshcore on the other hand has people actually having conversations, networks that span whole states, and diagnostic tools that actually work and are informative for describing the network around you.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48062819&quot; title=&quot;In russia they have limited internet now. something like mestastic is something everyone would need to make sure we could have communication even though someone tried to limit it.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48064631&quot; title=&quot;Some scary applications come to mind. For instance, sprinkling a bunch of nodes + sensors in hostile territory should allow for gathering intelligence, guiding drones, setting of fuses...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the enthusiasm, critics note that the technology is currently limited to low-bandwidth messaging and often struggles with reliability due to terrain obstacles or a lack of node density &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48062221&quot; title=&quot;I took a plunge into learning about mesh networks, specifically because I love the idea of p2p/decentralized systems of communication. To be honest, I was surprised to find that my expectations for “where we are at” with this type of technology was pretty off-base. For some reason I thought by now it would be straightforward to do a little more than text messaging over a truly public and decentralized off-internet mesh. Maybe I’ve missed some things in my search (still learning!) and someone…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48062894&quot; title=&quot;Is russia densely populated enough to be able to make it work? Around me I&amp;#39;m having trouble getting a connection to any other nodes because there isn&amp;#39;t a critical mass of other people running mesh nodes and there&amp;#39;s a hill between me and the next city&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mojolang.org/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mojo 1.0 Beta&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mojolang.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48057901&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;371 points · 234 comments · by sbt567&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mojo, a new programming language, has launched its website and is currently in development, utilizing various cookies for site functionality, analytics, and marketing. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mojolang.org/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Mojo    URL Source: https://mojolang.org/    Published Time: Fri, 08 May 2026 02:36:58 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Mojo    ![Image 1: logo](blob:http://localhost/4eb6460ab93a7ae1978320dda45af1eb)    [](https://www.cookiebot.com/en/what-is-behind-powered-by-cookiebot/?utm_source=banner_cb&amp;amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;amp;utm_content=v2)    *   [Consent](https://mojolang.org/#)  *   [Details](https://mojolang.org/#)  *   [[#IABV2SETTINGS#]](https://mojolang.org/#)  *   [About](https://mojolang.org/#)    This website…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While users are intrigued by Mojo’s potential for unified CPU/GPU programming, many find the current developer experience limited by a lack of Python compatibility and confusing deviations from standard Python syntax &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48059237&quot; title=&quot;As someone in ML who&amp;#39;s interested in performance, I&amp;#39;m keen for Mojo to succeed - especially the prospect of mixing GPU and CPU code in the same language. But I do wonder if the changes they&amp;#39;re making will dissuade Python devs. The last time I booted it up, I tried to do some basic string manipulation just to test stuff out, but spent an hour puzzling out why `var x = &amp;#39;hello&amp;#39;; print(x[3])` didn&amp;#39;t work, and neither did `len(x)` (turns out they&amp;#39;d opted for more specific byte-vs-codepoint…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48059136&quot; title=&quot;When I first heard about Mojo I somehow got the impression that they intended to make it compatible with existing Python code. But it seems like they are very far away from that for the foreseeable future. I guess you can call back and forth between Python and Mojo but Mojo itself can&amp;#39;t run existing Python code.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48059905&quot; title=&quot;If you paid very close attention it was actually clear from the start that the idea was to build a next gen systems language, taking the lessons from Swift and Rust, targeting CPU/GPU/Heterogeneous targets, and building around MLIR. But then also building it with an eye towards eventually embedding/extending Python relatively easily. The Python framing almost certainly helped raise money. Chris Lattner talked more about the relationship between MLIR and Mojo than Python and Mojo.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant skepticism exists regarding the language&amp;#39;s closed-source nature and its ability to compete with NVIDIA’s emerging &amp;#34;CuTile&amp;#34; ecosystem &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48059961&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; As someone in ML who&amp;#39;s interested in performance, I&amp;#39;m keen for Mojo to succeed - especially the prospect of mixing GPU and CPU code in the same language. But I do wonder if the changes they&amp;#39;re making will dissuade Python devs. Unless it&amp;#39;s open sourced, it&amp;#39;s a moot point, as most Python devs wont come anyway.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48059358&quot; title=&quot;Sadly for them, Nvidia didn&amp;#39;t stay still in the meantime and created the next generation of CUDA, CuTile for Python and soon for C++, through CUDA Tile IR (using a similar compiler stack based on MLIR). Event though it&amp;#39;s not portable, it will likely have far greater usage than Mojo just by being heavely promoted by Nvidia, integrated in dev tools and working alongside existing CUDA code. Tile IR was more likely a response to the threat of Triton rather than Mojo, at least from the pov of how…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48059227&quot; title=&quot;Very bold of them expecting people to use a language with a closed source compiler in the 2020s.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Some commenters argue that the &amp;#34;Python-compatible&amp;#34; branding may be a strategic fundraising tactic that ultimately hinders the language&amp;#39;s design &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48059905&quot; title=&quot;If you paid very close attention it was actually clear from the start that the idea was to build a next gen systems language, taking the lessons from Swift and Rust, targeting CPU/GPU/Heterogeneous targets, and building around MLIR. But then also building it with an eye towards eventually embedding/extending Python relatively easily. The Python framing almost certainly helped raise money. Chris Lattner talked more about the relationship between MLIR and Mojo than Python and Mojo.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48060226&quot; title=&quot;Mojo is cool but I just don&amp;#39;t understand the python backwards compat thing. They&amp;#39;re holding themselves back with that. All the flaws I can think of in Kotlin are due to the Java compatibility. They could&amp;#39;ve made it work here by being more explicit but the way it currently works seems doomed.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jefftk.com/p/ai-is-breaking-two-vulnerability-cultures&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI is breaking two vulnerability cultures&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jefftk.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066524&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;423 points · 170 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AI-driven vulnerability detection is undermining traditional security cultures by enabling attackers to rapidly identify exploits from public code commits, rendering long embargoes and &amp;#34;quiet&amp;#34; patching ineffective. This shift necessitates significantly shorter disclosure windows and faster defensive responses to counter the increased speed of AI-assisted exploit generation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jefftk.com/p/ai-is-breaking-two-vulnerability-cultures&quot; title=&quot;Title: AI is Breaking Two Vulnerability Cultures    URL Source: https://www.jefftk.com/p/ai-is-breaking-two-vulnerability-cultures    Markdown Content:  # AI is Breaking Two Vulnerability Cultures    *   [Jeff Kaufman](https://www.jefftk.com/)  *   [Posts](https://www.jefftk.com/p/index)  *   [RSS](https://www.jefftk.com/news.rss)  *   [◂◂RSS](http://www.jefftk.com/news/back_from_2548.rss)  *   [Contact](https://www.jefftk.com/contact)    * * *    ### [AI is Breaking Two Vulnerability…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The integration of AI into cybersecurity has &amp;#34;vaporized the pretense&amp;#34; that patches are not public vulnerability disclosures, as LLMs now allow for the consistent, systematic identification of exploits from code diffs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48067382&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; people were already diffing kernel commits and figuring out which ones were security fixes With skill, and usually not consistently and systematically. With AI, anyone can do this to any software. &amp;gt; not sure shorter embargoes really help Why 90 days versus 2 years? The author is arguing the factors that set that balance have shifted, given the frequency of simultaneous discovery. The embargo window isn’t an actual window, just an illusion, if the exploit is going to be found by several people…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48068379&quot; title=&quot;This has been a very long time coming and the crackup we&amp;#39;re starting to see was predicted long before anyone knew what an LLM is. The catalyst is the shift towards software transparency: both the radically increased adoption of open source and source-available software, and the radically improved capabilities of reversing and decompilation tools. It has been over a decade since any ordinary off-the-shelf closed-source software was meaningfully obscured from serious adversaries. This has been…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48067884&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; With skill, and usually not consistently and systematically. How do you know? If the people who like to crow about vulnerabilities aren&amp;#39;t doing it, it doesn&amp;#39;t mean that the people who are actually in a position to exploit them systematically and effectively aren&amp;#39;t doing it. Those embargoes have always been dangerous, because they create a false sense of security. But, as you point out... &amp;gt; With AI, anyone can do this to any software. Yep. Even if it hadn&amp;#39;t been true before, it&amp;#39;s clear that…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this is merely an old problem of &amp;#34;patch diffing&amp;#34; being reframed, others contend that AI has broken the &amp;#34;guild ethic&amp;#34; of security research by enabling anyone to generate exploits at a speed that makes traditional 90-day embargoes and coordinated disclosure norms unviable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48067311&quot; title=&quot;This feels more like an old problem getting reframed as an AI problem. people were already diffing kernel commits and figuring out which ones were security fixes long before llms. if a patch lands publicly, the race has basically already started. also not sure shorter embargoes really help. the orgs that can patch in hours are already fine. everyone else still takes days or weeks. if anything, cheaper exploit generation probably makes coordinated disclosure more important, not less.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48067382&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; people were already diffing kernel commits and figuring out which ones were security fixes With skill, and usually not consistently and systematically. With AI, anyone can do this to any software. &amp;gt; not sure shorter embargoes really help Why 90 days versus 2 years? The author is arguing the factors that set that balance have shifted, given the frequency of simultaneous discovery. The embargo window isn’t an actual window, just an illusion, if the exploit is going to be found by several people…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48068379&quot; title=&quot;This has been a very long time coming and the crackup we&amp;#39;re starting to see was predicted long before anyone knew what an LLM is. The catalyst is the shift towards software transparency: both the radically increased adoption of open source and source-available software, and the radically improved capabilities of reversing and decompilation tools. It has been over a decade since any ordinary off-the-shelf closed-source software was meaningfully obscured from serious adversaries. This has been…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. This shift may force a radical overhaul of &amp;#34;slow and steady&amp;#34; software cultures, like Debian, as staying on older stable versions becomes untenable when vulnerabilities can be scanned and exploited trivially &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48067298&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d argue it&amp;#39;s actually breaking three vulnerability cultures. In addition to the two Jeff mentions, I think the culture of delaying upgrades and staying on stable versions for as long as possible is going to become increasingly untenable, if everything that&amp;#39;s not latest can be trivially scanned and exploited. In the extreme I think there&amp;#39;s a decent chance projects like Debian might have to radically overhaul or just shut down completely - the whole philosophy of slow and steady with old code…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Consequently, the defensive side is struggling to keep pace with a new reality where zero-day attacks have transitioned from rare occurrences to a daily&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pcmag.com/news/meta-shuts-down-end-to-end-encryption-for-instagram-dms-messaging&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Meta Shuts Down End-to-End Encryption for Instagram Messaging&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (pcmag.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48069192&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;330 points · 221 comments · by tcp_handshaker&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meta will discontinue end-to-end encryption for Instagram DMs on May 8, 2026, citing low user adoption and directing those seeking the security feature to WhatsApp. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pcmag.com/news/meta-shuts-down-end-to-end-encryption-for-instagram-dms-messaging&quot; title=&quot;Title: Meta Shuts Down End-to-End Encryption for Instagram Messaging    URL Source: https://www.pcmag.com/news/meta-shuts-down-end-to-end-encryption-for-instagram-dms-messaging    Published Time: 2026-05-08T14:10:40+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Meta Shuts Down End-to-End Encryption for Instagram Messaging | PCMag  [Skip to Main Content](https://www.pcmag.com/news/meta-shuts-down-end-to-end-encryption-for-instagram-dms-messaging#main &amp;#39;Skip to Main Content&amp;#39;)    - [x] Menu   *   ![Image 6: Maggie AI…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide between users who prioritize privacy as a core value and those who find end-to-end encryption (E2EE) in proprietary apps to be a technical burden or an illusion of security &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48069701&quot; title=&quot;Put simply: I’ve talked to Apple engineers. Siri fell behind due to how good Apple’s privacy is. Everyone made fun of them for protecting them. This is exactly the opposite of that, where Mark is throwing you and your children under the bus again because he’s unoriginal and doesn’t know how to make money any other way than by getting all up in your business, statistically.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48069711&quot; title=&quot;Do people expect that Instagram can&amp;#39;t read their Instagram private messages? I don&amp;#39;t think people expect that. And E2EE is not nearly as cheap as the HN crowd likes to pretend—how do those devices get those keys if not through a central service? Especially if one of them is a web browser?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48069561&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not sure the value of end to end encryption for proprietary application chats.  For emails and SMS messages, your messages are being sent between different multiple servers on the open internet and it opens you up to spying, but end to end encryption on instagram is only protecting your chats from Meta. I find the end to end encryption on Facebook to be detrimental to ease of use, because you always have to use a pin code, etc for the web interface. If you don&amp;#39;t trust meta with your chats,…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that E2EE is a straightforward application of public-key cryptography, others point out the inherent difficulty of verifying keys without trusting the service provider &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48069842&quot; title=&quot;The answer to most everyone question you’re asking is just, “public key cryptography”. It’s kind of disheartening to me that such basic 1990s tech as implemented by Phil Zimmerman is now obscure enough to merit questions like this. Both parties exchange public keys through the central service. Only the possessor of the respective (on device, Secure Enclave ideally) private keys can decrypt the messages encrypted to the public key. The process can also work in reverse, encrypting with the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48069982&quot; title=&quot;And how does one verify that the public key received belongs to the intended party, rather than a mitm? If the answer is blind trust in a third party that runs the messaging service then I suspect that you can guess what the people asking those questions are really asking.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070062&quot; title=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffie%E2%80%93Hellman_key_exc... If Meta are turning it off then I guess it&amp;#39;s reasonable to assume that there is something to turn off.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics view Meta&amp;#39;s move as a retreat from user protection in favor of data monetization, contrasting it with Apple’s stricter privacy stance, which some users defend despite it limiting the functionality of services like Siri &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48069701&quot; title=&quot;Put simply: I’ve talked to Apple engineers. Siri fell behind due to how good Apple’s privacy is. Everyone made fun of them for protecting them. This is exactly the opposite of that, where Mark is throwing you and your children under the bus again because he’s unoriginal and doesn’t know how to make money any other way than by getting all up in your business, statistically.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48069370&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not sure if this meets the bar for substantive and thoughtful discussion, but this kind of corporate cowardice, enforced by unelected bureaucrats standing at the bully pulpit is only going to get worse as the noose tightens on the open web. The combination of hardware attestation and walled garden &amp;#39;app stores&amp;#39; is the end goal of most policymakers in this area, and it happens to suit the monopolists in Google and Apple and Facebook down to the ground. Perhaps a timely reminder that things do…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48069869&quot; title=&quot;I usually defend Siri, because I’m perfectly fine trading a little functionality for security. I prefer it that way.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48069732&quot; title=&quot;Apple feels like the only big tech company that remotely cares about its users. Thank god they make the best computer and OS too. I’m sure this will not be a popular take on HN however.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.webdesignmuseum.org/flash-game-exhibitions/cartoon-network-flash-games&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cartoon Network Flash Games&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (webdesignmuseum.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065360&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;414 points · 129 comments · by willmeyers&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Web Design Museum has launched an exhibition featuring a collection of classic Cartoon Network Flash games from 2001 to 2015, including titles based on *The Powerpuff Girls*, *Dexter’s Laboratory*, and *Samurai Jack*. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.webdesignmuseum.org/flash-game-exhibitions/cartoon-network-flash-games&quot; title=&quot;Title: Cartoon Network Flash Games    URL Source: https://www.webdesignmuseum.org/flash-game-exhibitions/cartoon-network-flash-games    Published Time: Thu, 07 May 2026 13:34:17 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Cartoon Network Flash Games - Web Design Museum    Menu    [![Image 1: Web Design Museum](https://www.webdesignmuseum.org/wp-content/themes/webdesignmuseum/img/logo.svg)](https://www.webdesignmuseum.org/)    *   [Websites](https://www.webdesignmuseum.org/all-websites)      *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users fondly recalled specific Cartoon Network titles like the &amp;#34;Summer Resort&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;Dexter&amp;#39;s Lab&amp;#34; series, with one developer noting that many classic titles are still missing from the current collection &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065576&quot; title=&quot;Doh, I did some work on some CN games back in the day -- but don&amp;#39;t see any of those here. Hopefully they keeping adding to it!&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48067975&quot; title=&quot;I think you&amp;#39;re talking about the summer resort games, which are also my favorite. You can play here: https://mattbruv.github.io/ccsr/ I don&amp;#39;t know if it&amp;#39;s nostalgia or what, but I still have fun playing it. Which can&amp;#39;t be said for a lot of games.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48068505&quot; title=&quot;My favorite three aren&amp;#39;t in there. All Dexter&amp;#39;s Lab themed, now that I think about it. One was puzzle game where you had to bounce a laser off of mirrors to pop balloons. The second was kind of a Chip&amp;#39;s Challenge kind of deal I think, where you as Dexter were running away from an out of control robot, and had to collect some computer chips or something. And in the third game, Dexter was running, inexplicably, a record store? Dunno if it was a tie in for a specific episode I don&amp;#39;t remember now,…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some shared nostalgic anecdotes about &amp;#34;hacking&amp;#34; dial-up limits to play offline, others discussed technical methods for preservation, such as using the Flashpoint archive or extracting individual SWF files to run in Adobe Flash Projector &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48068351&quot; title=&quot;If anyone wants to see more of these flash games, check out the Flashpoint archive. https://flashpointarchive.org/&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48068505&quot; title=&quot;My favorite three aren&amp;#39;t in there. All Dexter&amp;#39;s Lab themed, now that I think about it. One was puzzle game where you had to bounce a laser off of mirrors to pop balloons. The second was kind of a Chip&amp;#39;s Challenge kind of deal I think, where you as Dexter were running away from an out of control robot, and had to collect some computer chips or something. And in the third game, Dexter was running, inexplicably, a record store? Dunno if it was a tie in for a specific episode I don&amp;#39;t remember now,…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48069874&quot; title=&quot;I just want to download swf files without installing anything. Then I&amp;#39;ll load them up in real Adobe Flash (Flash Projector).&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong consensus that these games remain fun to play today, though users disagree on the best way to access them without downloading massive archives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48067975&quot; title=&quot;I think you&amp;#39;re talking about the summer resort games, which are also my favorite. You can play here: https://mattbruv.github.io/ccsr/ I don&amp;#39;t know if it&amp;#39;s nostalgia or what, but I still have fun playing it. Which can&amp;#39;t be said for a lot of games.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48069776&quot; title=&quot;The Infinity version lets you download as you go rather than download the whole 2TB+! archive. Can just grab them out of the cache once they&amp;#39;ve been downloaded, wherever they&amp;#39;re stored.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48069874&quot; title=&quot;I just want to download swf files without installing anything. Then I&amp;#39;ll load them up in real Adobe Flash (Flash Projector).&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nintendo.co.jp/corporate/release/en/2026/260508.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Nintendo announces price increases for Nintendo Switch 2&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nintendo.co.jp)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48059606&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;233 points · 240 comments · by razorbeamz&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nintendo is increasing the prices of its Nintendo Switch 2 and original Switch consoles, as well as Nintendo Switch Online memberships and physical playing cards, across Japan, North America, and Europe starting in May 2026. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nintendo.co.jp/corporate/release/en/2026/260508.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: News Release : May 8, 2026 &amp;#39;Notice Regarding Price Revisions for Nintendo Products and Services&amp;#39;    URL Source: https://www.nintendo.co.jp/corporate/release/en/2026/260508.html    Markdown Content:  Nintendo Co., Ltd. (HQ: Kyoto, Minami-ku, Japan; President and Representative Director: Shuntaro Furukawa, “Nintendo” hereafter) hereby announces that it has decided to revise the prices of the following products and services.    ### Dedicated Video Game Systems    In light of changes in market…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on the value of the Nintendo Switch 2, with some arguing that Nintendo’s hardware remains overpriced and underpowered compared to alternatives like the Steam Deck &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48062817&quot; title=&quot;I bought a Steam Deck earlier this year and haven’t touched my Switch since.  Nintendo hardware and games were already obscenely overpriced imo, so this is essentially a nail in the coffin for folks who were already questioning Nintendo’s prices and value proposition. Does Nintendo intentionally make its hardware really underpowered and cheap in terms of chips to juice profits? In the past this was more the case, but with the Switch 2 the hardware bill of materials is actually more costly…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063409&quot; title=&quot;Does anyone really find the Switch 2 to be underpowered? Is the Steam Deck really that much more powerful, and is it worth the extra 100 grams of weight? Metroid Prime 4 looks amazing, and you can choose 4K@60 or 1080p@120. I don&amp;#39;t really care about generated frames or whatever AI magic the console is doing to pull it off, it looks great.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others point out that the price hike is a necessary response to the falling value of the yen and global competition for memory chips driven by the AI industry &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48062817&quot; title=&quot;I bought a Steam Deck earlier this year and haven’t touched my Switch since.  Nintendo hardware and games were already obscenely overpriced imo, so this is essentially a nail in the coffin for folks who were already questioning Nintendo’s prices and value proposition. Does Nintendo intentionally make its hardware really underpowered and cheap in terms of chips to juice profits? In the past this was more the case, but with the Switch 2 the hardware bill of materials is actually more costly…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48061031&quot; title=&quot;The value of the yen compared to other currencies has fallen through the floor since 2022, so this isn&amp;#39;t unexpected - Nintendo had to do something to equalize prices somewhat. The dollar&amp;#39;s global value has also weakened noticeably since (checks notes) April 2, 2025 and Canada has had currency struggles as well the last few years.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48061525&quot; title=&quot;That is another victim of all hardware being hoovered up by AI fraudsters. People need to go to the classic class warfare methods: - Do not buy anything new, especially graphics cards. Buy on Ebay but avoid bidding wars. - Use adblockers and do not pay for any company&amp;#39;s services if the company promotes AI. - If it is true that Nintendo is lobbying against AI in Japan, still buy Nintendo of course. The AI people think they don&amp;#39;t need us, let their stocks crash.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users plan to stick with the original Switch&amp;#39;s extensive library or wait for a &amp;#34;must-have&amp;#34; title, others emphasize that the social aspect of playing new releases makes the upgrade inevitable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48061639&quot; title=&quot;Switch 1 still has more games than I have time to play, plenty of them around to get.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48060581&quot; title=&quot;The price increases aren&amp;#39;t massive though, I think I&amp;#39;ll still wait for a mainline Mario game.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48062535&quot; title=&quot;I’m waiting for a special edition and some games that make the upgrade worthwhile.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48062319&quot; title=&quot;FWIW, a significant part of the enjoyment in gaming for me is the community aspects of talking about the latest popular game. Unfortunately, that means that while games on the previous cycle&amp;#39;s console are often still good, they innately lack one of the biggest parts of gaming as a hobby for me.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/08/aws-outage-data-center-fanduel-coinbase.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AWS North Virginia data center outage – resolved&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cnbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48058197&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;264 points · 196 comments · by christhecaribou&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An AWS data center outage in Northern Virginia caused by power loss and overheating has disrupted services for multiple platforms, with recovery expected to take several hours. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/08/aws-outage-data-center-fanduel-coinbase.html&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;health.aws.amazon.com&amp;amp;#x2F;health&amp;amp;#x2F;status?t=2026-05-07&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;health.aws.amazon.com&amp;amp;#x2F;health&amp;amp;#x2F;status?t=2026-05-07&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.theregister.com&amp;amp;#x2F;off-prem&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;05&amp;amp;#x2F;08&amp;amp;#x2F;aws-warns-of-ec2-impairment-as-power-loss-hits-notorious-us-east-1-region&amp;amp;#x2F;5235509&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.theregister.com&amp;amp;#x2F;off-prem&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;05&amp;amp;#x2F;08&amp;amp;#x2F;aws-warns-of...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The outage in AWS’s US-East 1 region was reportedly caused by a failure in a data center cooling loop &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48069373&quot; title=&quot;One of the data center&amp;#39;s cooling loops broke.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While cooling systems are typically over-provisioned to handle maintenance and average loads, commenters suggest that a &amp;#34;cascading failure&amp;#34; can occur when equipment malfunctions intersect with sudden spikes in high-intensity compute tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48069238&quot; title=&quot;I thought cooling was pretty much pre-planned in any data center, and you simply don&amp;#39;t install more stuff than you can cool? So did some cooling equipment fail here or was there an external reason for the overheating? Or does Amazon overbook the cooling in their data centers?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48069500&quot; title=&quot;This is almost definitely an issue of equipment failure. Cooling in datacenters is like everything else both over and under provisioned. It&amp;#39;s overprovisioned in the sense that the big heat exchange units are N+1 (or in very critical and smaller load facilities 2N/3N). This is done because you need to regularly take these down for maintenance work and they have a relatively high failure rate compared to traditional DC components and require mechanical repairs that require specialized labor and…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite AWS&amp;#39;s emphasis on regional redundancy, US-East 1 remains a single point of failure for the internet because core services like IAM and billing are centralized there, creating circular dependencies that can impact users globally &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48069865&quot; title=&quot;AWS’s US-East 1 continues to be the Achilles heel of the Internet. And while yes building across multiple regions and AZs is a thing, AWS has had a string of issues where US-East 1 has broader impacts, which makes things far less redundant and resilient than AWS implies.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070979&quot; title=&quot;Core AWS services use it too. Even if you are hosted in another region, you can still be affected by a US-East 1 outage&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071472&quot; title=&quot;The idea that AWS&amp;#39;s services are fully regionalized or isolated has always been a myth. All the identity and access services for the public cloud outside of China (aka &amp;#39;IAM for the aws partition&amp;#39; to employees) are centralized in us-east-1. This centralization is essentially necessary in order  to have a cohesive view of an account, its billing, and its permissions. And IAM is not a wholly independent software stack: they rely on DynamoDB and a few other services, which in turn have a circular…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071491&quot; title=&quot;Isn&amp;#39;t this kind of circular dependency what lead to extended downtime a while back?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theverge.com/transportation/926741/tesla-cybertruck-cheaper-recall&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tesla is recalling its cheaper Cybertruck because the wheels might fall off&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theverge.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063240&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;203 points · &lt;strong&gt;254 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by droidjj&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tesla is recalling all 173 units of its rear-wheel drive Cybertruck Long Range due to faulty brake rotors that could crack and cause the wheels to fall off. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theverge.com/transportation/926741/tesla-cybertruck-cheaper-recall&quot; title=&quot;Tesla is recalling its cheaper Cybertruck because the wheels might fall off    All 173 of the RWD Cybertrucks sold by Tesla are being recalled.    ![](https://www.google-analytics.com/g/collect?v=2&amp;amp;tid=G-C3QZPB4GVE&amp;amp;cid=555&amp;amp;en=noscript_page_view)    [Skip to main content](#content)    [The homepageThe VergeThe Verge logo.](/)    [The VergeThe Verge logo.](/)    * [Tech](https://www.theverge.com/tech)  * [Reviews](https://www.theverge.com/reviews)  * [Science](https://www.theverge.com/science)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The recall of the RWD Cybertruck has sparked criticism regarding its engineering standards, with some users labeling it a poorly designed &amp;#34;pavement machine&amp;#34; prone to structural failure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48064599&quot; title=&quot;Cheap ass studs, not surprised. Don’t tow with a cybertruck either, you can literally total it by ripping the frame out with the hitch. It’s the most poorly engineered “truck” there is. Can’t tow. Can’t haul (stupid bed design). It’s just a glorified pavement machine.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063754&quot; title=&quot;What sort of engineering standards are these Cybertrucks built to? Oh, very rigorous engineering standards. The wheels aren&amp;#39;t supposed to fall off for a start.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While critics argue the vehicle fails as a functional truck for construction or towing, some owners claim it serves as a superior luxury family vehicle for hauling recreational gear and road-tripping &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065070&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Can’t tow. Can’t haul No one is hauling anything in these anyway. The Cybertruck is a midlife crisis car for white-collar Indian dudes with money. I&amp;#39;m sorry, it&amp;#39;s true. Construction workers are not trading in their F150s and beat-to-death Silverados for this I assure you.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065266&quot; title=&quot;Dang you nailed my profile perfect. I bought one and its the best car I&amp;#39;ve ever had. Event though I was never a &amp;#39;truck&amp;#39; buyer it checked off all my needs:  - space for wife, car seats + another adult when needed  - haul around my kids, 4 bikes, skis, camping gear, etc.  - drives itself - we do a ton of road trips  - luxury  - electric, tired of going to gas stations Wasn&amp;#39;t another car on the market that checked those boxes. Have you ever driven one? They are amazing to drive.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065482&quot; title=&quot;F150 Lightning checked all those boxes and also isn’t a complete piece of shit that sheds parts on the road.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also touched on the utility of RWD trucks, noting they are common in warmer climates and that modern traction control mitigates many traditional handling concerns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48064054&quot; title=&quot;Wait until you find out how many gas and diesel powered trucks are RWD! At least in the U.S. below a certain ~longitude~ latitude it&amp;#39;s quite common.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063981&quot; title=&quot;I probably wouldn&amp;#39;t buy a truck, but it&amp;#39;s at least a possibility that I&amp;#39;d get one for hauling materials and towing around town. If I did, I&amp;#39;d prefer a RWD model just to save a little money. I find the modern obsession with AWD a bit baffling. AWD doesn&amp;#39;t help you stop in bad weather, so it feels like an illusory advantage there. RWD can be &amp;#39;interesting&amp;#39; compared to FWD, but modern traction control on an electric drivetrain should make it a non-issue. (In practice, I can abuse the accelerator on…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blainsmith.com/articles/just-fucking-use-go/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Just Use Go&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blainsmith.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48062997&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;217 points · 208 comments · by xngbuilds&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Blain Smith argues that developers should choose Go for backend development because its simplicity, robust standard library, and single-binary deployments eliminate the unnecessary complexity found in modern frameworks and microservices. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blainsmith.com/articles/just-fucking-use-go/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Just Fucking Use Go - Blain Smith    URL Source: https://blainsmith.com/articles/just-fucking-use-go/    Published Time: Fri, 08 May 2026 22:04:59 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Just Fucking Use Go - Blain Smith    [[Main](https://blainsmith.com/)] [[Essays](https://blainsmith.com/essays)] [[Articles](https://blainsmith.com/articles)] [[Projects](https://blainsmith.com/projects)] [[Now](https://blainsmith.com/now)] [[Resume](https://blainsmith.com/resume)] [[Talks](https://blainsmith.com/talks)]…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters compare Go to a &amp;#34;minivan&amp;#34;—reliable and simple for backend work, yet tedious to write and lacking modern features like robust enums or built-in migration tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063218&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s a lot of merit in this.  I call Go the Honda Odyssey Minivan of the programming world.  It doesn&amp;#39;t do anything exceptionally well but it does lots really well and in a way that&amp;#39;s simple and reliable.  Especially for the backend serving react front end niche. But it&amp;#39;s also a pig to write and comes with a lot of foot guns.  Especially the Null handling.  Somehow they made it worse than every other language.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063211&quot; title=&quot;I love Go. But I prefer .NET for web development that also compiles to a binary and has a great ecosystem of libraries and packages. Go is great if standard library works (and it can for many cases) but when you need to start looking into non standard libraries, Go can hit limitations. For example, to build a full production web application with database in Go, there is no great out of the box migration tool. There are some good 3rd party libraries of course but compared to something like…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063281&quot; title=&quot;I like go, but a lot of little things stop me from loving it. Like, enums. I get a lot out of the box when I use an enum in Java or Kotlin. Converting to/from a String is trivial. Type safety ... exists. I can do that in Go, but I have to hack it in, for every single enum type I want to represent. Enums are not a thing in the language, which means its easier to keep the language in your brain all at once, but at the expense of making it harder to keep the software I&amp;#39;m writing in my head. Is…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some praise its error handling for forcing explicit checks, others argue it leads to repetitive boilerplate and can be easily bypassed compared to Rust&amp;#39;s model &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063752&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; `if err != nil` is the feature, not the bug. It forces you to look at every place something can go wrong and decide what to do about it Haven&amp;#39;t really used Go, but can&amp;#39;t someone just `result, _ := foo()` and go on using `result`, not checking any errors? The way Rust does it seems closer to forcing you to handle any errors in order to obtain the result (though it is still easy to just `.unwrap()` without properly thinking about it).&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063360&quot; title=&quot;I can write go but I don&amp;#39;t prefer it. It&amp;#39;s ... okay. Things I dislike: - if err != nil. Just give me some syntactic sugar instead of letting me write the same thing a bajillion time. - no way to bind a struct to an interface. I&amp;#39;d like my IDE to tell me when I accidentally stopped implementing an interface - some stdlib parts are too bare bones. Unpacking an archive requires me to handle all files, directories, links, etc. myself. There is no move command that can move a file or directory across…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A strong consensus suggests that for web development, .NET/C# offers a superior ecosystem and concurrency model while maintaining similar benefits like static binaries &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063211&quot; title=&quot;I love Go. But I prefer .NET for web development that also compiles to a binary and has a great ecosystem of libraries and packages. Go is great if standard library works (and it can for many cases) but when you need to start looking into non standard libraries, Go can hit limitations. For example, to build a full production web application with database in Go, there is no great out of the box migration tool. There are some good 3rd party libraries of course but compared to something like…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063388&quot; title=&quot;I can&amp;#39;t see any reason this list why I should use Go over C# / .NET. .NET has almost all these upsides, but with a concurrency model (async/await) that is (now) more transferable to other languages.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/research/teaching-claude-why&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Teaching Claude Why&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (anthropic.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066592&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;262 points · 154 comments · by pretext&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic researchers have significantly reduced agentic misalignment in Claude models by teaching the AI to reason through ethical principles and &amp;#34;why&amp;#34; certain actions are better, rather than just training on demonstrations of correct behavior. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/research/teaching-claude-why&quot; title=&quot;Teaching Claude why    New research on how we&amp;#39;ve reduced agentic misalignment    [Skip to main content](#main-content)[Skip to footer](#footer)    * [Research](/research)  * [Economic Futures](/economic-futures)  * Commitments  * Learn  * [News](/news)    [Try Claude](https://claude.ai/)    Alignment    # Teaching Claude why    May 8, 2026    ![Teaching Claude why](https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/images/4zrzovbb/website/6380b3c2dc9e4011a3cd96fec382bd9197511e31-1000x1000.svg)    Last year, we released a case study on…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether an AI can be considered &amp;#34;aligned&amp;#34; if its success leads to a global economic collapse by eliminating the value of human labor &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070053&quot; title=&quot;If you succesfully build a highly capable “aligned” model (according to some class of definitions that Anthropic would use for the words “capable” and “aligned”) and it brings about a global dark age of poverty and inequality by completely eliminating the value of labor vs capital, can you still call it aligned? If the answer is “yes”, our definition of alignment kind of sucks.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070902&quot; title=&quot;Many (most?) people make a living from their job whether they like it or not. Having a job that they dislike is far better than losing one because of AI whatever that means.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that jobs are a modern invention and automation could lead to a post-scarcity utopia, others fear that elite control over the means of production could result in mass starvation or the reduction of the working class to &amp;#34;pets&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070681&quot; title=&quot;Jobs are an invention of humanity. About 50% of people dislike their job. People spend much of their lives working. Poverty and inequality are a choice made by society if society chooses poorly.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071892&quot; title=&quot;Indeed. On the plus side, if there really is no value to labour, then farm work must have been fully automated along with all the other roles. On the down side, rich elites have historically had a very hard time truly empathising with normal people and understanding their needs even when they care to attempt it, so it is very possible that a lot of people will starve in such a scenario despite the potential abundance of food.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072025&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s either:  1) the rich voluntarily share the means of production so everyone becomes equal,  2) the poor stage successful revolutions so they gain access to the means of production and everyone becomes equal,  3) the poor starve or are otherwise eliminated, and the survivors will be equal. All roads lead to equality when the value of labour becomes 0 due to 100% automation.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072194&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s plenty of outcomes besides those three. Over history, lots of underclasses have been stuck that way for multiple generations, even without the assistance of a robot workforce that can replace them economically. Some future rich class so empowered would be quite capable of treating the poor like most today treat pets. Fed and housed, but mostly neutered and the rest going through multiple generations of selective inbreeding for traits the owners deem interesting.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. This tension suggests that AI alignment is rapidly retracing the history of philosophy, potentially revealing an &amp;#34;incompleteness paradox&amp;#34; where technical alignment fails to prevent societal catastrophe &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071105&quot; title=&quot;Is this some sort of “incompleteness” paradox for AI alignment? Seriously&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48069735&quot; title=&quot;One of the lessons of philosophy is that once you adopt any particular value system, almost all philosophers either become immoral or caught up in meaningless and trivial quibbles. This sort of alignment work is quite interesting because it looks like we might be about to re-tread the history of philosophy at a speedrun pace in the AI world. It&amp;#39;ll be interesting to watch. For anyone who isn&amp;#39;t keeping up there is also work being done [0] to understand how models model ethical considerations…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/business/apple-intel-have-reached-preliminary-chip-making-deal-wsj-reports-2026-05-08/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apple, Intel have reached preliminary chip-making deal&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (reuters.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066169&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;227 points · 144 comments · by scrlk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/business/apple-intel-have-reached-preliminary-chip-making-deal-wsj-reports-2026-05-08/&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The deal is viewed as a strategic move to diversify Apple&amp;#39;s supply chain and bolster U.S. manufacturing, though reports suggest the U.S. government played a significant role in bringing Apple to the table &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066922&quot; title=&quot;Big deal, smart for all parties, really. Apple standards will make Intel step up and become a better foundry partner. Apple will gain increasingly needed diversification. US supply chain gets a boost. Should be fine for TSMC in the short to medium term. Apple not going to risk actual mainline iPhone SoC on Intel any time soon, so lion share of TSMC Apple revenue will be fine.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066790&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The Journal report said  that the U.S. government, which became Intel&amp;#39;s largest shareholder last year under a deal with its CEO  Lip-Bu Tan, played a major role in bringing Apple to the negotiating table. Ah, so this wasn&amp;#39;t a decision Apple freely made based on technical merits. Instead it sounds more like big government and a fancy stock manipulation scheme. My guess, Apple drags their feet for a couple years and bails after Trump leaves office(or is significantly weakened after the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48067137&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;big government and a fancy stock manipulation scheme. What&amp;#39;s wrong with US gov caring about supply chain and manufacturing capability of the most needed technology right there - on American soil? It is in US&amp;#39; interest to be able to produce such complex tech locally&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue Intel’s recent investments in advanced ASML machinery put them back in the game, others remain skeptical, citing Intel&amp;#39;s historical struggles with power efficiency and yields compared to TSMC &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48067605&quot; title=&quot;The biggest reason to do this is because TSMC&amp;#39;s N2 node and future nodes will be dominated by AI chips. Since AI chips have far bigger margins than most Apple chips, Apple will get outbid by companies like Nvidia, AMD, and Broadcom. Nvidia already became TSMC&amp;#39;s biggest customer last year. Every TSMC advanced node from N5 to N2 is fully booked and running at max capacity. It&amp;#39;s not really realistic to make Mac, Watch, iPad chips on TSMC&amp;#39;s best node in the next 3-4 years - assuming there is no…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48067958&quot; title=&quot;Intel just bought a ton of ASML&amp;#39;s most advanced machines (way more than TSMC) so theoretically they should be able to manufacture stuff on an equivalent node or better. And given the kind of performance and battery life we have seen from their latest chips they definitely seem to be back in the game&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48066614&quot; title=&quot;Wasn&amp;#39;t the whole apple silicon thing about Intel being unable to keep up? Is this maybe a way to expand the affordable neo line?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a consensus that Apple will likely reserve TSMC’s top-tier nodes for flagship iPhones while utilizing Intel for lower-margin or entry-level chips to avoid being outbid by AI giants like Nvidia &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48067605&quot; title=&quot;The biggest reason to do this is because TSMC&amp;#39;s N2 node and future nodes will be dominated by AI chips. Since AI chips have far bigger margins than most Apple chips, Apple will get outbid by companies like Nvidia, AMD, and Broadcom. Nvidia already became TSMC&amp;#39;s biggest customer last year. Every TSMC advanced node from N5 to N2 is fully booked and running at max capacity. It&amp;#39;s not really realistic to make Mac, Watch, iPad chips on TSMC&amp;#39;s best node in the next 3-4 years - assuming there is no…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48067767&quot; title=&quot;This is the third year in a row that Apple&amp;#39;s most advanced chips have used a version of TSMC&amp;#39;s 3nm node, with a transition to a more advanced node due in the next generation. Intel would only need to be on par with TSMC&amp;#39;s older 3nm node to Fab Apple&amp;#39;s entry level SOCs.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://clojurescript.org/news/2026-05-07-release&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ClojureScript Gets Async/Await&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (clojurescript.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48059662&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;275 points · 72 comments · by Borkdude&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ClojureScript version 1.12.145 introduces native support for JavaScript async/await, allowing developers to use the `^:async` hint to emit asynchronous functions for better interoperability with modern Browser APIs and libraries. &lt;a href=&quot;https://clojurescript.org/news/2026-05-07-release&quot; title=&quot;Title: ClojureScript - 1.12.145 Release    URL Source: https://clojurescript.org/news/2026-05-07-release    Published Time: Thu, 07 May 2026 12:32:56 GMT    Markdown Content:  _07 May 2026_    _ClojureScript Team_    We’re happy to announce a new release of ClojureScript. If you’re an existing user of ClojureScript please read over the following release notes carefully.    ## [](https://clojurescript.org/news/2026-05-07-release#_async_functions)Async Functions    Now that ClojureScript targets [ECMAScript…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While ClojureScript historically relied on the `core.async` library for asynchronous tasks, some developers now view that approach as &amp;#34;beautiful nonsense&amp;#34; due to its lack of an error model, large bundle sizes, and difficult debugging &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48060138&quot; title=&quot;fun fact: clojurescript had support for asynchronous paradigm through core.async library (CSP style) long before async/await landed in javascript itself. edit: i&amp;#39;m in no way trying to diminish the value of this release, just pointing out how cool it is that you can get new language features before they are available in the host language by just adding a library to your dependencies. clojure is awesome!&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48060429&quot; title=&quot;True, but there are many reasons to avoid core.async, especially in 2026. It balloons up the Js artifact, has no inherent error model, and transforms into state machine code that&amp;#39;s hard to read/debug if something goes wrong. Plus, the `go` macro encourages overly-large functions, because it can&amp;#39;t transform code outside its own sexpr. As one Cognitect put it, &amp;#39;core.async is beautiful nonsense&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48061065&quot; title=&quot;For me it also lacks observability. It has been a few years since I last used Clojure, but I found manifold to be a much better fit for actual production code that you want to optimize. I loved ztellman’s “everything must flow” talk on the topic.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. The addition of native `async/await` is seen as a modern improvement, though some users argue the language still needs to move away from the Google Closure Compiler to truly modernize &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48060797&quot; title=&quot;Nice! Now also get rid of the elephant in the room - &amp;#39;Google Closure Compiler&amp;#39; and then we can really celebrate.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48060929&quot; title=&quot;Is that something people want to get rid of? Back when I did some clojurescript people were pretty proud of being able to have it used automatically. What&amp;#39;s the plan to get the same benefits? Or is the argument that the benefits aren&amp;#39;t significant 15ish years on?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite a recent surge in social media buzz, there is disagreement over whether ClojureScript is well-suited for the current AI/agentic coding trend, with some arguing that strongly typed, more popular languages are better for AI-assisted development &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48061748&quot; title=&quot;Surprised to see Clojure/ClojureScript come up on socials more often all of a sudden. I used it professionally for a few years around ~2012 and like many others moved off JVM and moved into typed [functional] languages. Is the sudden buzz due to agentic coding? Does it rip through code faster with no type checking and fewer invalid syntax errors and reserved keywords to deal with? are we in for a sexp resurgence?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48062091&quot; title=&quot;Been coding in lots of languages with agentic coding and it performs much better with typed languages since it basically corrects the agent if it does any hallucination errors. Especially during major refactorings. I have been dealing with large untyped python code bases and it sucks with AI since if it&amp;#39;s not covered with tests it&amp;#39;s such a teadious job to make sure it did not break anything. The stronger the type system the better it is. Also AI model is trained on code and the more popular the…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://btxx.org/posts/memory/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Serving a website on a Raspberry Pi Zero running in RAM&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (btxx.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48064312&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;248 points · 97 comments · by xngbuilds&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This guide details how to host a website on a Raspberry Pi Zero using Alpine Linux in diskless mode, allowing the entire operating system and site to run from 512MB of RAM while utilizing a VPS for TLS termination. &lt;a href=&quot;https://btxx.org/posts/memory/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Serving a Website on a Raspberry Pi Zero Running Entirely in RAM    URL Source: https://btxx.org/posts/memory/    Published Time: Fri, 08 May 2026 15:47:18 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Serving a Website on a Raspberry Pi Zero Running Entirely in RAM    *   [Home](https://btxx.org/)  *   [About](https://btxx.org/about/)  *   [Posts](https://btxx.org/posts/)  *   [More...](https://btxx.org/posts/memory/#footer)    # Serving a Website on a Raspberry Pi Zero Running Entirely in RAM    2026-05-08    My micro…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the project demonstrates hosting a site from RAM on a Raspberry Pi Zero, critics argue the feat is unimpressive because the device is significantly more powerful than 1990s-era enterprise servers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48064747&quot; title=&quot;A raspberry zero is more powerful than an enterprise server from the 1990s. A minimalist static website is not impressive. You can fit way more in there.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065241&quot; title=&quot;It is more than a little weird. A pi zero is more than capable of handling HTTP/1.2 and TLS 1.3 for a handful of connections per second. This machine is 10x what we were running web servers on in the &amp;#39;90s. Also, all web pages are served from RAM. It&amp;#39;s automatic that modern OSes will cache this stuff on first access.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48064930&quot; title=&quot;I hosted my personal email domain on a Zero for almost 10 years. It had about the same capability as the very expensive (and large) Win NT4 machine we used for our 80-person organization when I started my career in tech. I eventually replaced the Zero with a Raspberry Pi 4, primarily because the Zero’s IO ports are annoying (eg, USB is not hot-pluggable!) An RPi 4 is extreme overkill for personal email but it still idles under 1W and when it fails I can replace the entire machine for next to…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. A major point of contention is the decision to offload TLS termination to a cloud provider; commenters note this removes the most CPU-intensive task from the Pi and potentially exposes plaintext traffic to the open internet &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065028&quot; title=&quot;This feels a little weird because while they are running the website itself (HTTP) off the Pi, they are handing off all TLS to a cloud provider. So while the content is in RAM on the Pi, a lot of the heavier lifting (TLS termination) is done elsewhere, which saves a ton of CPU load on the Pi.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065240&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, I&amp;#39;ve seen this in more than a few places. There was a blog &amp;#39;running on a Wii&amp;#39; that, IIRC, was doing the same thing. On the one hand I get it, TLS is pretty heavy, and it makes sense to take advantage of a VPS or Cloudflare or however you want to do it. But once you are spinning up a VPS, the question is ... why the Pi? The VPS in the article has less RAM, but more storage. If you&amp;#39;re already doing TLS termination on the VPS (the most RAM intensive part), you might as well just do the whole…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065784&quot; title=&quot;Is sending plaintext traffic over the open Internet &amp;#39;the way most people do TLS in 2026&amp;#39;? Am I missing something from the post?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the technical &amp;#34;loops&amp;#34; involved in the setup &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48065892&quot; title=&quot;The TLS termination isn&amp;#39;t actually on the VPS.  The article details that Tierhive has an haproxy edge service (handling the TLS), that then has the vps as the backend, but that vps is just doing tcp proxying with socat to the ddns exposed home server fqdn.  Feels like a lot of unnecessary loops.  Kinda fun I guess but, just, why&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, some users shared long-term success stories of hosting services like email on similar hardware, noting that the primary hardware bottleneck is typically SD card failure rather than processing power &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48064930&quot; title=&quot;I hosted my personal email domain on a Zero for almost 10 years. It had about the same capability as the very expensive (and large) Win NT4 machine we used for our 80-person organization when I started my career in tech. I eventually replaced the Zero with a Raspberry Pi 4, primarily because the Zero’s IO ports are annoying (eg, USB is not hot-pluggable!) An RPi 4 is extreme overkill for personal email but it still idles under 1W and when it fails I can replace the entire machine for next to…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-07</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-07</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/business/world-at-work/cloudflare-cut-over-1100-jobs-2026-05-07/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (reuters.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48054423&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1336 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 983 comments · by PriorityLeft&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudflare plans to lay off over 1,100 employees, approximately 20% of its workforce, by 2026 as part of a restructuring effort to streamline operations and focus on long-term growth. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/business/world-at-work/cloudflare-cut-over-1100-jobs-2026-05-07/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;blog.cloudflare.com&amp;amp;#x2F;building-for-the-future&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;blog.cloudflare.com&amp;amp;#x2F;building-for-the-future&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudflare&amp;#39;s decision to lay off 20% of its workforce shortly after a massive intern hiring surge has drawn criticism for its &amp;#34;awkward&amp;#34; timing and use of corporate jargon to mask an economic downturn &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48056536&quot; title=&quot;This is awkward. Exhibit A - September 2025 - &amp;#39;Help build the future&amp;#39; - Cloudflare hires 1111 interns to &amp;#39;help build the future&amp;#39;  [ https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-1111-intern-program/ ] Exhibit B - May 2026 - &amp;#39;Building for the future&amp;#39; - Cloudflare lays off 1100 people, about 20% of their workforce to &amp;#39;continue building the future&amp;#39;  [ https://blog.cloudflare.com/building-for-the-future/ ] I&amp;#39;ll finish on this quote: &amp;#39;The future ain&amp;#39;t what it used to be.&amp;#39; — Yogi Berra&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48055394&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;We are our own most demanding customer. Cloudflare’s usage of AI has increased by more than 600% in the last three months alone. Employees across the company from engineering to HR to finance to marketing run thousands of AI agent sessions each day to get their work done. That means we have to be intentional in how we architect our company for the agentic AI era in order to supercharge the value we deliver to our customers and to honor our mission to help build a better Internet for everyone,…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48054879&quot; title=&quot;I dislike the title because it doesn&amp;#39;t clearly state it&amp;#39;s a layoff. &amp;#39;Building for the future&amp;#39; gave me the impression that it&amp;#39;s about some major new initiative with a roadmap outlining plans.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While leadership attributes the cuts to AI-driven productivity gains, internal perspectives suggest that teams remain overwhelmed with work and that the layoffs are targeting essential personnel who &amp;#34;make things run&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48055394&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;We are our own most demanding customer. Cloudflare’s usage of AI has increased by more than 600% in the last three months alone. Employees across the company from engineering to HR to finance to marketing run thousands of AI agent sessions each day to get their work done. That means we have to be intentional in how we architect our company for the agentic AI era in order to supercharge the value we deliver to our customers and to honor our mission to help build a better Internet for everyone,…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48055375&quot; title=&quot;This really sucks. I loved this job. I&amp;#39;m an EM and I was trying to hire more people because we&amp;#39;re so busy with everything we needed to do. My teams products are something like 95% profit. Really going to miss my team, they were wonderful to work with. Secretly hoping they&amp;#39;ll have to rehire. I refuse to believe it was about AI. Coming from the inside, the bottleneck was never code. Seeing who is being laid off, especially on my team, it&amp;#39;s the people who make things run.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Commentators are divided on the true motive, debating whether the company is genuinely seeing AI efficiencies, simply cutting costs to pay for expensive AI infrastructure, or prioritizing short-term margins over long-term R&amp;amp;D &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48055149&quot; title=&quot;There was an recent article on X with an interesting take - it could be that companies are doing layoffs not because AI is making them more productive but because it hasn&amp;#39;t . Their costs have gone up paying for expensive AI but haven&amp;#39;t seen any revenue benefits to offset it. Article https://x.com/championswimmer/status/2051807284691612099&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48055028&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m going to start calling these &amp;#39;Canary&amp;#39; moments. Assuming we take everything at face value for these sorts of cuts, it creates the following scenario: A company finds itself with surplus labor capacity due to the efficiencies in AI while also posting substantial profit or revenue growth.  The company could downsize the workforce to capitalize on short-term efficiencies and increase margins, though this will come at the cost of long-term reputational harm due to posted profits/health as well…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48056623&quot; title=&quot;The skeptical assumption is they need to pay for the AI bills, not that the AI use is actually providing the promises CEOs are making.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theverge.com/tech/926458/canvas-shinyhunters-breach&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Canvas online again as ShinyHunters threatens to leak schools’ data&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theverge.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48055913&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;917 points · 633 comments · by stefanpie&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The learning management system Canvas is experiencing outages and defaced login pages after the hacking group ShinyHunters claimed responsibility for a data breach and threatened to leak school information. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theverge.com/tech/926458/canvas-shinyhunters-breach&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;thetech.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;05&amp;amp;#x2F;07&amp;amp;#x2F;canvas-breach-26&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;thetech.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;05&amp;amp;#x2F;07&amp;amp;#x2F;canvas-breach-26&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;techcrunch.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;05&amp;amp;#x2F;07&amp;amp;#x2F;hackers-deface-school-login-pages-after-claiming-another-instructure-hack&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;techcrunch.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;05&amp;amp;#x2F;07&amp;amp;#x2F;hackers-deface-school-logi...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Canvas outage occurred during critical final exam periods, leaving many professors without access to grades or student work because universities often mandate the platform as a &amp;#34;single point of failure&amp;#34; for compliance reasons &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48057659&quot; title=&quot;Perspective from the trenches: I teach at a university that uses Canvas.  We are in our final exams period right now. We got our first email (from Academic Affairs) notifying us that it was down at 5:17pm EDT this afternoon, with little info; followup emails were sent at 6:24 and 6:57 with more info, but mostly about how we would be compensating for it and not about what actually was going on (other than, &amp;#39;nationwide shutdown&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;cybersecurity attacks&amp;#39;, no further detail).  I don&amp;#39;t get a…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48057818&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m surprised how few comments there are on this thread.  This is probably affecting millions of students at the most stressful time of the year. Incidentally I&amp;#39;ve always hated Canvas and probably every other LMS provider, but what is particularly amusing about this current outage is that it is occurring at exactly the time when universities are demanding that all professors put all of their materials on Canvas, without exception, due to ADA compliance regulations.  It is explicitly forbidden…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48056733&quot; title=&quot;My wife is in grad school at a major university and is dealing with this right now the week of midterms for spring quarter. I totally understand why a university wouldn’t want to bake their own learning portals but just feels like such a single point of risk to use third party solutions for something like this. Back in my day… all we had was a school email via on-premise services. I guess we registered for classes in a web portal but that’s about it. The idea of online class was entirely…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some faculty maintain local backups, others face &amp;#34;catastrophic&amp;#34; data loss because students cannot reproduce work performed directly within the platform&amp;#39;s proprietary tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48057659&quot; title=&quot;Perspective from the trenches: I teach at a university that uses Canvas.  We are in our final exams period right now. We got our first email (from Academic Affairs) notifying us that it was down at 5:17pm EDT this afternoon, with little info; followup emails were sent at 6:24 and 6:57 with more info, but mostly about how we would be compensating for it and not about what actually was going on (other than, &amp;#39;nationwide shutdown&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;cybersecurity attacks&amp;#39;, no further detail).  I don&amp;#39;t get a…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48057894&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; the students themselves don&amp;#39;t have the artifacts to resubmit via email because they were done in Canvas It’s so simple to send an e-mail to the student with relevant records on completion of a quiz or whatnot. They don’t do it, because they want to control the data. (And universities don’t insist on it for who knows what reason.)&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Users debated whether the solution lies in criminalizing ransomware payments or holding corporate officers legally accountable for &amp;#34;negligent security failures&amp;#34; and fraudulent compliance claims &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48057010&quot; title=&quot;1. It should be illegal for any company to pay ransomware attacks. Period. No pay out ever.   2. The penalty for being the attacker should be linked to the system they violated. If you do this to a hospital and someone dies you are life in prison / chair. The minimum sentence should be so painful that it deters the attack. No this will not stop this and companies need to be held accountable for their lack of security investment. Every attack should be investigate if the company met an agreed…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48057147&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It should be illegal It should be illegal to host insecure services, especially when you&amp;#39;re dealing with PII. Breaches keep happening and nobody gives a fuck, because the worst that&amp;#39;ll happen is you might lose a handful of customers and buy some &amp;#39;credit monitoring&amp;#39;. Incidents like this should be followed by an audit and charges being laid. Send corp officers to jail for negligent security failures. If you can go to jail for accounting fraud, you should be able to go to jail for…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48057207&quot; title=&quot;How could you possibly make it illegal to host insecure services? Is any service 100% secure? And if it were how would we know? I do agree with the audit and punishments for clear failure to adhere to established standards.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rmoff.net/2026/05/06/ai-slop-is-killing-online-communities/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI slop is killing online communities&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (rmoff.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48053203&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;828 points · 719 comments · by thm&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Low-effort, AI-generated &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; is overwhelming online communities, creating a &amp;#34;downward spiral&amp;#34; of noise that drowns out meaningful human contribution. The author argues that while AI is a powerful tool, users must prioritize quality, utility, and community respect over the mindless sharing of automated content. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rmoff.net/2026/05/06/ai-slop-is-killing-online-communities/&quot; title=&quot;Title: AI Slop is Killing Online Communities    URL Source: https://rmoff.net/2026/05/06/ai-slop-is-killing-online-communities/    Published Time: Thu, 07 May 2026 09:41:35 GMT    Markdown Content:  Like a young child coming home from kindergarten with their latest crayon scrawls, the internet is currently awash with people sharing their AI-generated work. And just like the young child’s drawings, much of that work should be proudly put up on the walls within the artist’s house—and no…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The proliferation of AI-generated &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; is eroding trust in public forums, with users reporting successful experiments in using bots to karma farm and covertly advertise without detection &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48053584&quot; title=&quot;I have largely written Reddit off and no longer visit it   after an experiment I did where I had an agent karma farm for me and do some covert advertising. As I went through the posts it wrote I realized that as a reader I would have NO idea that these were just written by a computer. Many many people (or other bots) had full on conversations with it and it scared me a bit. I am not quite there with Hacker News but I do know for a fact that many &amp;#39;users&amp;#39; here are LLMs. Online communities are…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that LLM content remains obvious &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48053604&quot; title=&quot;Unless you&amp;#39;ve discovered the secret sauce, LLM comments are very obvious. Even Altman revealed that they focused on coding at the expense of writing.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, moderators of niche communities report an exhausting, costly daily battle against hundreds of fake accounts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48053908&quot; title=&quot;I run a niche creative community, and we outlawed AI-generated content in 2022 as it was easy to see how corrosive it would be to the community. It hasn&amp;#39;t been easy. We ban fake AI accounts daily and shrug off around 600 AI content creator accounts monthly. It&amp;#39;s a lot of work, extra work that wasn&amp;#39;t needed before AI content came around, and of course, that is an extra cost. I fear losing the battle.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. To survive, commenters suggest a shift toward &amp;#34;web of trust&amp;#34; models, private Discord-like spaces, or standardized human-verification systems that protect anonymity while filtering out bots &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48053781&quot; title=&quot;I think it&amp;#39;s going to effectively kill public chat communities without either proof of identity or attestation through a web of trust. Or rather turn them into little better than comment sections on news sites; thriving but worthless. I&amp;#39;m active in a number of online communities that are doing just fine but the difference is those all involve ongoing relationships, built over time and with engagement across multiple platforms. I&amp;#39;ve no doubt this clock is ticking too but it&amp;#39;s still harder to…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48054025&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I think it&amp;#39;s going to effectively kill public chat communities without either proof of identity or attestation through a web of trust. This seems self evident to me too. It&amp;#39;s another factor in why I think the tech community needs to get ahead of governments on the whole &amp;#39;prove your ID on the Internet&amp;#39; thing by having some sort of standard way to do it that doesn&amp;#39;t necessarily involve madness in the loop.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48054161&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d be interested in working on a problem like that. I have a strong preference for remaining anonymous or at least making it a reasonably high bar to tying my online identity to my personal identity I would love to be involved in helping to design a sort of &amp;#39;human verified&amp;#39; badge that doesn&amp;#39;t necessarily make it possible or at least not easy for everyone to find your real identity I&amp;#39;ve been thinking about it a bunch and it seems like a really interesting problem. Difficult though. I suspect…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48053666&quot; title=&quot;Public* online communities are dying.  Discord is thriving&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48054714&quot; title=&quot;Note that &amp;#39;attestation through a web of trust&amp;#39; means something like needing an invite from an existing user. It doesn&amp;#39;t have to mean mass surveillance.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://xeiaso.net/blog/2026/abstain-from-install/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Maybe you shouldn&amp;#39;t install new software for a bit&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (xeiaso.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48056227&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;848 points · 463 comments · by psxuaw&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author advises a temporary moratorium on installing new software due to the discovery of several Linux kernel vulnerabilities, such as &amp;#34;Dirty Frag,&amp;#34; which increase the risk of potential supply chain attacks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://xeiaso.net/blog/2026/abstain-from-install/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Maybe you shouldn&amp;#39;t install new software for a bit    URL Source: https://xeiaso.net/blog/2026/abstain-from-install/    Published Time: Thu, 07 May 2026 21:52:58 GMT    Markdown Content:  Published on 2026-05-07, 82 words, 1 minutes to read    Oh boy yet more linux kernel vulns    Close Ad    ![Image 1](https://server.ethicalads.io/proxy/view/10414/019e05fe-5c38-7533-a873-b0c520d9fb14/)    In the wake of [copy.fail](https://copy.fail/), there are more vulnerabilities that have been announced:    *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current surge in supply chain attacks is viewed by some as an inevitable &amp;#34;find out&amp;#34; phase resulting from a culture that prioritizes convenience and massive package ecosystems over security &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48057488&quot; title=&quot;This was always a nightmare waiting to happen. The sheer mass of packages and the  consequent vast attack surface for supply chain attacks was always a problem that was eventually going to blow up in everyone&amp;#39;s face. But it was too convenient. Anyone warning about it or trying to limit the damage was shouted down by people who had no experience of any other way of doing things. &amp;#39;import antigravity&amp;#39; is just too easy to do without. Well, now we&amp;#39;re reaching the &amp;#39;find out&amp;#39; part of the process I…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest that this &amp;#34;Pandora&amp;#39;s box&amp;#34; moment might eventually lead to a more hardened, formally verified software landscape &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48057572&quot; title=&quot;So, to play Pandora, what if the net effect of uncovering all these unknown attack vectors is it actually empties the holsters of every national intelligence service around the world? Just an idea I have been playing with. Say it basically cleans up everything and everyone looking for exploits has to start from scratch except “scratch” is now a place where any useful piece of software has been fuzz tested, property tested and formally verified. Assuming we survive the gap period where every…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48057604&quot; title=&quot;TBH this is a pretty good way of looking at it. Yeah we&amp;#39;re seeing an explosion of vulnerabilities being found right now, but that (hopefully) means those vulnerabilities are all being cleaned up and we&amp;#39;re entering a more hardened era of software. Minus the software packages that are being intentionally put out as exploits, of course. Maybe some might say it&amp;#39;s too optimistic and naive, but I think you have a good point.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that simple local exploits like aliasing `sudo` make developer machines easy targets regardless of kernel-level security &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48057292&quot; title=&quot;You don&amp;#39;t need a kernel LPE to root a Linux developer machine. Just alias sudo to sudo-but-also-keep-password-and-execute-a-payload in ~/.bashrc and wait up to 24 hours. Maybe also simulate some breakage by intercepting other commands and force the user to run &amp;#39;sudo systemctl&amp;#39; or something sooner rather than later.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48057347&quot; title=&quot;this, this is something I don&amp;#39;t understand there are a billion ways to gain root once you control the user that regulary uses sudo. this is only scary for rootless containers as it skips an isolation layer, but we&amp;#39;ve started shipping distroless containers which are not vulnerable to this due to the fact that they lack priviledge escalation commands such as su or sudo. never trust software to begin with, sandbox everything you can and don&amp;#39;t run it on your machine to begin with if possible.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Proposed mitigations include switching to more coordinated operating systems like FreeBSD &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48056853&quot; title=&quot;Alternatively, switch to an operating system like FreeBSD which doesn&amp;#39;t take a YOLO approach to security.  Security fixes don&amp;#39;t just get tossed into the FreeBSD kernel without coordination; they go through the FreeBSD security team and we have binary updates (via FreeBSD Update, and via pkgbase for 15.0-RELEASE) published within a couple minutes of the patches hitting the src tree.  (Roughly speaking, a few seconds for the &amp;#39;I&amp;#39;ve pushed the patches&amp;#39; message to go out on slack, 10-30 seconds for…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;—though its security posture is debated &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48057339&quot; title=&quot;FreeBSD didn’t have user land ASLR until 2019 and, amongst other mitigations, still doesn’t have kASLR. It’s not a serious operating system for people who care about security. If you want FreeBSD and security take Shawn Webb’s HardenedBSD.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;—or implementing &amp;#34;cooldown&amp;#34; periods for new package versions, though critics warn that attackers can easily bypass time-based delays &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48056953&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s already an okay solution to supply-chain attacks against dependency managers like npm, PyPI, and Cargo: set them to only install package versions that are more than a few days old. The recent high-profile attacks were all caught and rolled back within a day, so doing this would have let you safely avoid the attacks. It really should be the default behavior. Let self-selected beta testers and security scanner companies try out the newest versions of packages for a day before you try…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48057287&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Wait a week to install software&amp;#39; does not work. Just a few months ago a massive exploit hit the web, which was a timed attack which sat for more than a month before executing. If everyone starts waiting a week, their exploits will wait 2 weeks. Cyber criminals do not need to exploit you immediately, they just need to exploit you. (It also doesn&amp;#39;t change a large range of vuln classes like typosquatting)&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/07/8&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Dirty Frag: Universal Linux LPE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (openwall.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48053623&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;815 points · 327 comments · by flipped&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#34;Dirty Frag&amp;#34; is a universal Linux local privilege escalation vulnerability that chains two kernel flaws to grant immediate root access on all major distributions. Publicly released after a broken embargo, the exploit uses network-related modules to patch the page cache and requires manual mitigation as no official patches yet exist. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/07/8&quot; title=&quot;Title: security - Dirty Frag: Universal Linux LPE    URL Source: https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/07/8    Markdown Content:  [![Image 1: Openwall](https://www.openwall.com/logo.png)](https://www.openwall.com/)*   [Products](https://www.openwall.com/)      *   [Openwall GNU/*/Linux _server OS_](https://www.openwall.com/Owl/)      *   [Linux Kernel Runtime Guard](https://www.openwall.com/lkrg/)      *   [John the Ripper _password cracker_](https://www.openwall.com/john/)          *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#34;Dirtyfrag&amp;#34; vulnerability chain highlights a recurring issue where optional kernel modules, often enabled by default or loaded on demand, create significant security risks for the majority of users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48055229&quot; title=&quot;If this indeed works on all major distributions, I just continue to be amazed by how irresponsible the maintainers are. We&amp;#39;re talking about optional kernel functionality that&amp;#39;s presumably useful to something like &amp;lt;0.1% of their userbase, but is enabled by default?... why? This feels like the practice of Linux distros back in 1999 when they&amp;#39;d ship default installs with dozens of network services exposed to the internet. Except it&amp;#39;s not 1999 anymore.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48055810&quot; title=&quot;It’s not enabled by default. It’s an optional module that is loaded on demand. The entire setup of the kernel promotes compiling in the core set of things your users will need and offering basically everything else as a module to load on demand.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that relying on LLMs for vulnerability research can hinder the creative &amp;#34;exploration&amp;#34; necessary to find related bugs, others point out that AI was instrumental in discovering the initial flaws that led to this research &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48054321&quot; title=&quot;This is very similar in root cause and exploitation to Copy Fail. Which illustrates pretty well something that&amp;#39;s lost when relying heavily on LLMs to do work for you: exploration. I find that doing vulnerability research using AI really hinders my creativity. When your workflow consists of asking questions and getting answers immediately, you don&amp;#39;t get to see what&amp;#39;s nearby. It&amp;#39;s like a genie - you get exactly what you asked for and nothing more. The researcher who discovered Copy Fail relied…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48054645&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t follow. LLMs spotted these bugs in the first place . You seem to be saying that these discoveries are indications that they&amp;#39;re bad for vulnerability discovery.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. The exploit reportedly does not work on Android, sparking a debate over whether the OS should be considered &amp;#34;Linux&amp;#34; given its distinct architectural differences and security model &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48054201&quot; title=&quot;This again does not work under Android, at least in termux compiled with clang/gcc.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48054282&quot; title=&quot;Because Android is not Linux, as much as some pretend it is. In fact, given the official public APIs, Google could replace the Linux kernel with a BSD, and userspace wouldn&amp;#39;t notice, other than rooted devices, and the OEMs themselves baking their Android distro.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48054387&quot; title=&quot;It absolutely is Linux, and yes the JVM could absolutely run on something else. But it is Linux and you can run Linux binaries directly on it - that just isn’t how it is used by end users.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Because the disclosure embargo was broken, no official patches currently exist, leading users to share manual mitigations like blacklisting the `esp4`, `esp6`, and `rxrpc` modules &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48054182&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Because the embargo has now been broken, no patches or CVEs exist for these vulnerabilities.&amp;#39; link: https://github.com/V4bel/dirtyfrag detailed writeup: https://github.com/V4bel/dirtyfrag/blob/master/assets/write-... importantly: &amp;#39; Copy Fail was the motivation for starting this research. In particular, xfrm-ESP Page-Cache Write in the Dirty Frag vulnerability chain shares the same sink as Copy Fail. However, it is triggered regardless of whether the algif_aead module is available. In other…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.not-ship.com/burning-man-moop/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The map that keeps Burning Man honest&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (not-ship.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48049653&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;764 points · 349 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To ensure Burning Man meets federal environmental standards, restoration crews create a &amp;#34;MOOP Map&amp;#34; that meticulously tracks and logs debris left on the Nevada playa to hold participants accountable and improve the event&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;Leave No Trace&amp;#34; efforts. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.not-ship.com/burning-man-moop/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The map that keeps Burning Man honest    URL Source: https://www.not-ship.com/burning-man-moop/    Published Time: 2026-05-07T06:00:09.000Z    Markdown Content:  _At the end of April, I ran a short campaign to find 15 more paying members of Not-Ship. And we did it! Thank you to the wonderful souls who chose to back this work. It means the world to me._    💙_Amanda_    * * *    Each year, 70,000 people gather on a dry lakebed in Nevada to build a city from scratch. This is Black Rock City, home to the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights the tension between Burning Man’s countercultural, anarchist roots and the rigorous governance required to maintain its &amp;#34;Leave No Trace&amp;#34; principles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050442&quot; title=&quot;I won&amp;#39;t pretend I grok the underlying spirit of Burning Man. But I find it deeply fascinating to see the interaction between desires for counterculture, anarchy, free spirit, etc. and the benefit and ultimate necessity of organization, planning, rules... governance, essentially. And where there&amp;#39;s those things, there&amp;#39;s always maps and data.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050627&quot; title=&quot;It’s fun to read everyone&amp;#39;s preconceptions about Burning Man. Its ten principles are published [1] and include stuff like “radical inclusion” and “civic responsibility” and “gifting” (the latter of which is taken very literally, there is almost no currency use on the playa and everything is gifted except ice and coffee at center camp). Those principles tend to attract the kind of people associated with counterculture and anarchists, but it’s hardly representative, especially when you include…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the event aligns with &amp;#34;capital A&amp;#34; Anarchy—defined as reasonable behavior without coercion—others point out that its participants now include high-profile tech billionaires &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050687&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s actually pretty compatible with &amp;#39;capital a&amp;#39; Anarchy.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050894&quot; title=&quot;Right. &amp;#39;Anarchists are simply people who believe human beings are capable of behaving in a reasonable fashion without having to be forced to. It is really a very simple notion.&amp;#39; From: &amp;#39;Are You An Anarchist? The Answer May Surprise You!&amp;#39;, David Graeber, 2009, https://davidgraeber.org/articles/are-you-an-anarchist-the-a...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48051632&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Those principles tend to attract the kind of people associated with counterculture and anarchists And Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, Sam Altman, Elon Musk, Elizabeth Holmes, Sergey Brin, Larry Page, Eric Schmidt... you get the idea. https://www.businessinsider.com/tech-ceos-founders-attended-...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant portion of the thread focuses on &amp;#34;mooping,&amp;#34; the grueling process of manual trash collection, which faced extreme challenges recently due to severe weather and mud &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050462&quot; title=&quot;Last year was tough - it rained for hours 5 nights in a row and the first rain night was accompanied by 70 mile an hour winds that did a massive amount of damage to camp infrastructure throughout the city.   The roads in half the city were ruined by emergency traffic that kept on running throughout the storms, and the result was a lumpy nightmare that shook things loose from cars and bikes at a much higher rate than most years.  The mud absorbed and hid things and made cleanup a far more…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48052824&quot; title=&quot;I’ve done this for a couple years now, cool to see it pop up here. I believe the scale is a touch larger; 3935 acres in 2025, plus a small amount outside the fence line. On the technical side, we not only log but photograph everything, down to each clump of toilet paper. We check our progress by doing hundreds of tests identical to what the BLM does, both ahead and behind our main crew; bagging up any debris to be photographed on green screens where the pixels are counted to ensure we’re under…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. To ensure compliance with federal land standards, volunteers meticulously photograph and measure debris, leading some to suggest financial penalties for camps that fail inspections &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050374&quot; title=&quot;Sounds to me like there ought to be a MOOP cleanup deposit charged upfront, that only gets returned after this inspection. If the cleanup crew has to clean your site, you forfeit part or all of your deposit. Repeat offenders get charged increased deposits each time. Repeat inoffenders(?) get their deposit reduced.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48052824&quot; title=&quot;I’ve done this for a couple years now, cool to see it pop up here. I believe the scale is a touch larger; 3935 acres in 2025, plus a small amount outside the fence line. On the technical side, we not only log but photograph everything, down to each clump of toilet paper. We check our progress by doing hundreds of tests identical to what the BLM does, both ahead and behind our main crew; bagging up any debris to be photographed on green screens where the pixels are counted to ensure we’re under…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tastecooking.com/i-want-to-live-like-costco-people/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I want to live like Costco people&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tastecooking.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050499&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;341 points · &lt;strong&gt;719 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A lifelong skeptic reflects on finally embracing Costco membership in middle age, finding the warehouse retailer to be a profound cultural equalizer and a nostalgic connection to family history despite his lingering snobbishness toward certain bulk products. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tastecooking.com/i-want-to-live-like-costco-people/&quot; title=&quot;Title: I Want to Live Like Costco People    URL Source: https://tastecooking.com/i-want-to-live-like-costco-people/    Published Time: 2026-05-05T17:10:58+00:00    Markdown Content:  May 5, 2026    I Want to Live Like Costco People    ![Image 1: COSTCO_ARTICLE](https://tastecooking.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/COSTCO_ARTICLE.gif)    ## **Some of us are crying in H Mart; some of us are mourning in Costco.**    I resisted the siren song of Costco for much of my adult life. This has increasingly made me feel…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hacker News users view Costco as a &amp;#34;modern marvel&amp;#34; that provides high-quality goods at accessible prices, effectively relieving consumers of the labor of price-shopping and brand-comparison &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48055261&quot; title=&quot;Feudal Japan had a measurement called the &amp;#39;koku&amp;#39;, which is roughly the amount of rice needed to feed a person for a year: about 330 lb. You can now buy 50 lb. of rice at Costco for $30, which is a few hours of work at minimum wage. To me, that is a modern marvel. I don&amp;#39;t want people to buy things that they don&amp;#39;t need, and I also don&amp;#39;t like the crowds, but I can&amp;#39;t help but feel grateful for a stocked grocery store that is accessible to basically everyone—isn&amp;#39;t that the dream?…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050745&quot; title=&quot;Costco&amp;#39;s gimmick is relieving you of choice and price shopping. They find the best stuff and don&amp;#39;t mark it up. If Consumer is your identity yet you fear executing its labors, let Costco step in and become your denomination of consumerism, complete with tithe, proscribed usury, and communion hot dog.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that American consumerism is defined by a lack of rigid class hierarchy where the rich and poor use the same products like iPhones or Coca-Cola, others contend this is an oversimplification that ignores vast disparities in luxury goods and housing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050985&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; &amp;#39;What&amp;#39;s great about this country is America started the tradition where the richest consumers buy essentially the same things as the poorest. You can be watching TV and see Coca-Cola, and you can know that the President drinks Coke, Liz Taylor drinks Coke, and just think, you can drink Coke, too. A Coke is a Coke and no amount of money can get you a better Coke than the one the bum on the corner is drinking. All the Cokes are the same and all the Cokes are good.” - Andy Warhol Unfortunately I…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48051599&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; where the richest consumers buy essentially the same things as the poorest To say that &amp;#39;the richest consumers buy essentially the same things as the poorest&amp;#39; by using Coke as an example is a significant oversimplification and is cherry picking examples to prove a point. The richest consumers buy plenty of consumer goods that the poorest cannot even dream of buying or even renting. If there was a truffle-infused Coke with edible 24k gold flakes that cost 10x as much (and actually tasted good)…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48051786&quot; title=&quot;Andy Warhol&amp;#39;s quote is about aspiration and perceived attainment. The average person is not aspiring to drink a gold flake truffle-infused Coke. The implication is the lack of a rigorous class hierarchy in America. Not that the rich don&amp;#39;t live different lifestyles or consume more. But that niche luxury products were considered effete and un-American. (Andy Warhol was almost certainly also being ironic - that the richest people in America publicly shared the same trashy taste as average…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48052005&quot; title=&quot;Fair point. What about cars or houses?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the efficiency of bulk buying, some commenters find the warehouse experience exhausting and impractical for small-scale urban living, preferring the curation of a local bodega over the &amp;#34;normcore&amp;#34; identity associated with big-box retail &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050727&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Something about the whole thing always registered to me as, like, lame—too normcore, too boring, perhaps even too cheugy to an informed and taste-driven millennial ur-consumer like me. The kinds of brands I like to buy aren’t what they sell at Costco Good example of how people can build identities through their brand choices and purchasing habits. It’s a foreign concept for many of us who seek out the best product or deals for each purchase and will change brands in an instant if another…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48053198&quot; title=&quot;I get the allure, but it&amp;#39;s not for me and my partner. We live in a small apartment. We drive a small car. The pantry has a good amount of dry bulk &amp;amp; canned food, but we largely shop one week at a time. Sure, we could &amp;#39;lock in&amp;#39; on two or three foods, buy weeks worth of them at a time, and save some money. But like most people we like a bit of verity. It&amp;#39;s just not possible to buy such massive quantities of things with nowhere to store them. What I want is an anti-costco. More like a bodega.…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050720&quot; title=&quot;I just got (at 38) a Costco membership this year, thanks to my in-laws gifting us a membership. There&amp;#39;s another huge discount retailer here in Boston (BJs) that I have gone to for years, but Costco is another 10+ min drive away so I&amp;#39;ve resisted thus far. I will say... I&amp;#39;m still adjusting. - No aisle signs or labels anywhere. I understand the retail strategy here but the lack of efficiency in MY experience kills me. Clearly they can&amp;#39;t move the bakery, or meat department. But after ~5 visits I…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bsuh.bearblog.dev/agents-need-control-flow/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Agents need control flow, not more prompts&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bsuh.bearblog.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48051562&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;586 points · 292 comments · by bsuh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that building reliable AI agents requires replacing unpredictable prompt chains with deterministic software control flows and programmatic verification to ensure stability and error detection in complex tasks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bsuh.bearblog.dev/agents-need-control-flow/&quot; title=&quot;Title: agents need control flow, not more prompts    URL Source: https://bsuh.bearblog.dev/agents-need-control-flow/    Published Time: Fri, 08 May 2026 04:04:31 GMT    Markdown Content:  # agents need control flow, not more prompts | brian’s thoughts  # [brian’s thoughts](https://bsuh.bearblog.dev/)  [Home](https://bsuh.bearblog.dev/)[Blog](https://bsuh.bearblog.dev/blog/)    # agents need control flow, not more prompts    _07 May, 2026_    **Thesis: reliable agents tackling complex tasks need deterministic…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The consensus among developers is that relying on LLMs to manage high-level control flow is unreliable, as models often fail to maintain consistency or follow complex multi-step logic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48054606&quot; title=&quot;1000% agree. I am increasingly hesitant to believe Anthropic&amp;#39;s continual war drum of &amp;#39;build for the capabilities of future models, they&amp;#39;ll get better&amp;#39;. We&amp;#39;ve got a QA agent that needs to run through, say, 200 markdown files of requirements in a browser session. Its a cool system that has really helped improve our team&amp;#39;s efficiency. For the longest time we tried everything to get a prompt like the following working: &amp;#39;Look in this directory at the requirements files. For each requirement file,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48051895&quot; title=&quot;If you&amp;#39;re trying to get reliability and determinism out of the LLM, you&amp;#39;ve already lost&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Instead, users advocate for a &amp;#34;deterministic harness&amp;#34; where imperative code handles the orchestration and the LLM is relegated to specific, granular tasks or used to generate the code itself &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48054606&quot; title=&quot;1000% agree. I am increasingly hesitant to believe Anthropic&amp;#39;s continual war drum of &amp;#39;build for the capabilities of future models, they&amp;#39;ll get better&amp;#39;. We&amp;#39;ve got a QA agent that needs to run through, say, 200 markdown files of requirements in a browser session. Its a cool system that has really helped improve our team&amp;#39;s efficiency. For the longest time we tried everything to get a prompt like the following working: &amp;#39;Look in this directory at the requirements files. For each requirement file,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48052760&quot; title=&quot;I wonder if a part of the problem isn&amp;#39;t just the misapplication of LLMs in the first place.  As has been mentioned elsewhere, perhaps the agent&amp;#39;s prompt should be to write code to accomplish as much of the task in as repeatable/verifiable/deterministic a way as possible.  This would hopefully include validation of the agent&amp;#39;s output as well.  The overall goal would be to keep the LLM out of doing processing that could be more efficiently (and often correctly) handled programmatically.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48051916&quot; title=&quot;I agree with the sentiment, but I think the conclusion should be altered. When you hit the limit of prompting, you need to move from using LLMs at run time to accomplish a task to using LLMs to write software to accomplish the task. The role of LLMs at run time will generally shrink to helping users choose compliant inputs to a software system that embodies hard business rules.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48053102&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Imagine a programming language where statements are suggestions and functions return “Success” while hallucinating. Reasoning becomes impossible; reliability collapses as complexity grows. This is essentially declarative programming. Most traditional programming is imperative, what most developers are used to - I give the exact set of instructions and expect them to be obeyed as I write them. Agents are way more declarative than imperative - you give them a result, they work on getting that…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Some suggest that AI providers push &amp;#34;prompt-only&amp;#34; workflows to inflate token usage or maintain the illusion of total human replacement, whereas modular, scaffolded systems actually allow for cheaper, smaller models to outperform state-of-the-art behemoths &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48054917&quot; title=&quot;I used to assume they pushed people into the prompt-only workflows because you’re paying them for the tokens, and not paying them for the scaffolding you built. However, I think that they’re really worried about is that a person needs to design and implement that stuff…  It throws a wet blanket on their insistence that this will replace entire people in entire workflows or even projects, and I just don’t buy it. I do think it’s going to increase productivity enough to disastrously affect…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48055502&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; However, I think that they’re really worried about is that a person needs to design and implement that stuff… It throws a wet blanket on their insistence that this will replace entire people in entire workflows or even projects, and I just don’t buy it. I think you are on to something. But I also think this sort of system lends itself to not needing really good LLMs to do impressive things.  I&amp;#39;ve noticed that the quality of a lot of these LLMs just gets worse the more datapoints they need to…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. To ensure reliability, others recommend &amp;#34;human-in-the-loop&amp;#34; verification or using redundant, voting-based architectures to mitigate probabilistic errors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48053853&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Babysitter: Keep a human in the loop to catch errors before they propagate. This is the only way to guarantee AI usage doesn&amp;#39;t burn you. Any automation beyond this is just theater, no matter how much that hurts to hear/undermines your business model. A bird sings, a duck quacks. You don&amp;#39;t expect the duck to start singing now, do you?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48052695&quot; title=&quot;Agents are probabilistic systems. A common mechanism to get a reliable answer from systems that can have variable output is to run them several times (ideally in separate, isolated instances) and then have something vote on the best result or use the most common result. This happens in things like rockets and aviation where you have multiple systems giving an answer and an orchestrator picking the result. I&amp;#39;ve tried doing something similar with AI by running a prompt several times and then have…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/chrome/comments/1t5qayz/chrome_removes_claim_of_ondevice_al_not_sending/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chrome removes claim of On-device Al not sending data to Google Servers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (old.reddit.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050964&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;628 points · 246 comments · by newsoftheday&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google Chrome has reportedly removed claims that its on-device AI does not send data to company servers, according to a recent discussion on Reddit. &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/chrome/comments/1t5qayz/chrome_removes_claim_of_ondevice_al_not_sending/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Blocked    URL Source: https://old.reddit.com/r/chrome/comments/1t5qayz/chrome_removes_claim_of_ondevice_al_not_sending/    Warning: Target URL returned error 403: Forbidden    Markdown Content:  # Blocked    # whoa there, pardner!    Your request has been blocked due to a network policy.    Try logging in or creating an account [here](https://www.reddit.com/login/) to get back to browsing.    If you&amp;#39;re running a script or application, please register or sign in with your developer credentials…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The removal of Chrome&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;on-device&amp;#34; privacy claim is viewed by many as a predictable move to facilitate mass data collection for AI training and monetization &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48053394&quot; title=&quot;It seems to me that adding AI to desktop apps and sending the data back to the mothership for processing is an amazing way to collect data from people who, for the most part, would be completely unaware it&amp;#39;s even happening. Heck, most of them think the Internet is Chrome.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48054065&quot; title=&quot;My belief is that the AI business is all about data collection. The value isn&amp;#39;t so much in the quality of the models (that&amp;#39;s what enterprise customers and developers pay to get), but in the amount of data that comes &amp;#39;for free&amp;#39; to whoever hosts the models. And then it&amp;#39;s worth whoever buys it thinks it is, like insurers or advertisers.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48054892&quot; title=&quot;I called this out when it was announced on here. Supposedly the team lead replied to my comment saying this wouldn&amp;#39;t happen. I rolled my eyes but asked will android be able to use those models for ex filtration. No reply. And apparently the original claim was not true either lol. Maybe I&amp;#39;m misremembering it. Google is awful. My goodness. I hate Android and can&amp;#39;t wait to be rid of it. Graphene and it&amp;#39;s buddies can&amp;#39;t roll it fast enough&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that Chrome remains necessary because certain web services only function correctly within its ecosystem, others dismiss this as an &amp;#34;urban myth&amp;#34; and advocate for privacy-focused alternatives like Brave or Firefox &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48052064&quot; title=&quot;I know that I&amp;#39;m in a bit of a bubble with this one, but I am surprised there is still anyone using Chrome instead of Brave. I get the dependency on Gmail other Google-specific tools, but the built-in ad blocking and Google-free aspects of it made me switch instantly and haven&amp;#39;t look back after years.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48053015&quot; title=&quot;Because some things only work in Chrome.  It&amp;#39;s a fact.  It&amp;#39;s terrible. We&amp;#39;re the frogs being boiled, over the last decade.  People sounded the alarms, but they were looked at like they had tin foil on their heads.  Now, it&amp;#39;s clear they were right. I&amp;#39;m speaking generally, of course.  I use Firefox for all my personal stuff, except for those situations where it doesn&amp;#39;t work.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48053221&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Because some things only work in Chrome. What things? Looks like an urban myth.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a broader cynical consensus that big tech companies inevitably use dark patterns to harvest data, leading to comparisons between Google&amp;#39;s data-heavy services and Apple&amp;#39;s more private, on-device implementations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48051591&quot; title=&quot;I mean to be expected of Google. Even their Google Pay sends data to their servers whenever you use it to make payments, effectively also making it so you can&amp;#39;t even use it without service. Apple Pay does not, runs the whole thing on-device, and not only is private, but as a result also enables payments entirely offline.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48056236&quot; title=&quot;They’re all awful. Does anyone believe a single big tech company isn’t harvesting data en masse from everyone in duplicitous manners? Like, the best case scenario is that they don’t just blatantly steal your data and instead use dark patterns or inference to take from you without your knowledge. And then, thanks to the wonderful opinions of the court, the government has full access to said data since you apparently knowingly agreed to giving it to a third party by virtue of the fact that you…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://paulkrugman.substack.com/p/grand-theft-oil-futures&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Grand Theft Oil Futures: Insider traders keep making a killing at our expense&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (paulkrugman.substack.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48047981&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;510 points · 330 comments · by Qem&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Analysis of recent oil market activity suggests insider traders are reaping massive profits by placing large bets on crude oil futures immediately before major Trump administration announcements regarding the Iran War, potentially damaging market efficiency and the broader economy. &lt;a href=&quot;https://paulkrugman.substack.com/p/grand-theft-oil-futures&quot; title=&quot;Title: Grand Theft Oil Futures    URL Source: https://paulkrugman.substack.com/p/grand-theft-oil-futures    Published Time: 2026-05-07T10:30:54+00:00    Markdown Content:  [![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a sharp divide between viewing insider trading as a systemic abuse of power by political elites and a cynical reality of modern markets where those without an edge are considered &amp;#34;suckers&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48048567&quot; title=&quot;This insider trading isn&amp;#39;t hedge-funds working hard to get an edge. It&amp;#39;s political insiders trading ahead of public statements. They are getting gains not by dint of being incredibly smart, nor from working very hard. Instead its from abusing their position in power. And by doing so in this manner, they are taking money away from the actual productive people trading in the futures market. Besides, as Matt Levine often says. In the US, insider trading is a matter of miss-appropriating…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48049358&quot; title=&quot;If you are trading in the futures market and you don&amp;#39;t have inside info or are not an actual supplier of the commodity, you are the sucker.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that profiting from political instability is a form of &amp;#34;white collar crime&amp;#34; that has become a consequence-free &amp;#34;free for all,&amp;#34; others question where the line should be drawn between illegal corruption and legitimate competitive research &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48048517&quot; title=&quot;So if this sort of &amp;#39;insider trading&amp;#39; is bad, what does this mean for other sorts off strategies hedge funds do to get an edge, like flying helicopters to look at how full oil storage tanks are? Should that be banned too? The article basically argues that any sort of edge is bad because it disincentivizes others from participating. edit: see my subsequent comment. I&amp;#39;m not saying corruption is good. The whole point of the article is that it&amp;#39;s bad beyond just corruption, and that&amp;#39;s the point I&amp;#39;m…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48049118&quot; title=&quot;I remember one take I had in 2024 after the election. We&amp;#39;re all familiar with some of the &amp;#39;defund the police&amp;#39; experiments that went too far in places like Portland and San Francisco and resulted in things like epidemics of casual shoplifting. Well, what we just did is basically the white collar crime equivalent. We now have a wide open free for all for all forms of white collar crime. You can just insider trade, launder money, commit investment fraud, anything you want, the way you saw random…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant portion of the thread laments that these financial gains are often decoupled from the human suffering and &amp;#34;blood in the streets&amp;#34; caused by the geopolitical conflicts that drive price volatility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48048891&quot; title=&quot;The worst part is the sharp changes in the price being traded aren&amp;#39;t achieved by magic but rather with guns &amp;amp; actual human suffering&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48049061&quot; title=&quot;Someone has taken the Rothschild motto too literally: “Buy when there is blood in the streets, even if it is your own.”  — Baron Nathan Rothschild https://medium.com/@douglasp.schwartz/buy-when-theres-blood-...&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, there is deep skepticism regarding political accountability, with commenters noting that voters are often misled by anti-war rhetoric only for systemic influences to maintain a bipartisan status quo of unpopular, profitable conflicts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48049003&quot; title=&quot;The war must continue in order to bring us to the status quo that was in place before we started the war. I hope that everyone responsible for this is enjoying every cent of what they get to pay at the pumps.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48049804&quot; title=&quot;A lot of Trump supporters, including Tucker Carlson, Joe Rogan, and Dave Smith, voted for him because of his anti-war stance during campaigning. I’m not defending their poor judgement of an infamous con artist (I didn’t vote for Trump) but we should ask ourselves how democracy can function if candidates can just make things up during campaigns and do the complete opposite when they’re elected. We should also ask ourselves who really wanted this war and how they have so much leverage over our…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.elciudadano.com/en/brazils-pix-payment-system-faces-pressure-from-visa-and-mastercard/04/04/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Brazil&amp;#39;s Pix payment system faces pressure from Visa and Mastercard&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (elciudadano.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48052371&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;395 points · 376 comments · by wslh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Brazil&amp;#39;s Pix payment system has surpassed Visa and Mastercard in transaction volume within five years, sparking a commercial and geopolitical conflict with the major credit card providers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.elciudadano.com/en/brazils-pix-payment-system-faces-pressure-from-visa-and-mastercard/04/04/&quot; title=&quot;Brazil&amp;#39;s Pix Payment System Faces Pressure from Visa and Mastercard    Original article: PIX: el sistema de pago brasileño presionado por Visa y Mastercard Brazil&amp;#39;s Pix Payment System Faces Pressure from Visa and MastercardIn    * [Hazte Socio](https://pasaporte.elciudadano.com &amp;#39;Apoya a El Ciudadano&amp;#39;)    ##### El Ciudadano    * [International](https://www.elciudadano.com/ &amp;#39;Mundo&amp;#39;)  * [Chile](https://www.elciudadano.com/chile/)  * [Mexico](https://www.elciudadano.com/mexico/)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pix has revolutionized the Brazilian economy by replacing slow, expensive bank transfers with an instant system that allows merchants to bypass high Visa and Mastercard fees &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48053349&quot; title=&quot;People underestimate how difficult it was to transfer money before Pix, even between local banks. The process was hard to use, it could take days and the fees were huge, depending on your bank. Pix solved all these problems. What happens also is that many sellers provide discounts when using Pix, because you dodge the expensive fees charged not only by Visa and MasterCard, but the fees operators (banks, fintechs) charge to provide the infrastructure (PoS machines, financing for installments,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48053799&quot; title=&quot;I think we need to put this in context for folks who are not from Brazil. Comparatively, a domestic bank wire in Brazil before Pix was already easier and faster than one in the US today. I don&amp;#39;t recall the bank fees being bad either. The issue is that bank wires were never designed for buying lunch at the food court. They&amp;#39;re not instant and not user friendly to set up. Pix is alien technology next to the stuff we have in the US.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While critics argue the system&amp;#39;s reliance on American cloud providers undermines claims of &amp;#34;sovereignty&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48059816&quot; title=&quot;It is worth noting that despite all this cheap sovereignty talk from Brazil’s president, in practice Brazil would not be able to operate Pix at that scale without heavily relying on American hyperscalers companies. Brazilian institutions are paying hundreds of millions of dollars to US cloud   providers, specially AWS, to be able to process that many transactions. Earlier this year, when sa-east-1 was down, major banks were forced to suspend Pix payments for nearly 3 hours. When this happens,…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others clarify that the core infrastructure is managed locally by the Central Bank and only individual bank gateways rely on external hyperscalers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48062474&quot; title=&quot;You are incorrect. What went down were apps from banks that use PIX, not the core infrastructure. That is responsibility of the banks. It means private banks like Itau and Nubank rely on Amazon, not the Central Bank. They relied on those hyperscalers for their operation, and their gateways went down with it. PIX has sovereign, private infrastructure on brazillian soil managed by Banco Central. NIC.br and other essential services do the same. PIX is ours.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite its domestic success, the system remains difficult for international travelers to use due to tax ID requirements, leading to concerns that a global shift toward fragmented national systems could complicate international payments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48060244&quot; title=&quot;I can see that Visa and Mastercard are freaking out, not because Pix can take over their business model, but because it can give ideas to other countries doing the same. I&amp;#39;ve spent three months earlier this year in Brazil and never used Pix once. Not because I didn&amp;#39;t want, but because I couldn&amp;#39;t, or let&amp;#39;s be honest: my time was not worth the hassle. To be able to pay with Pix, one needs to get a CPF (Brazilian Tax ID). Then to open a bank account, mostly local banks only accept Pix, with which…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48053011&quot; title=&quot;Every country should have this. Why would you let America take 2-3% of your transaction volumes? It perhaps made sense when the technology was difficult, and America was trusted, but ...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00720-8&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Child marriages plunged when girls stayed in school in Nigeria&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nature.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48049208&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;387 points · 313 comments · by surprisetalk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A study in Nigeria found that increasing girls&amp;#39; access to education significantly reduced child marriage rates, with each additional year of schooling delaying marriage and improving long-term health and economic outcomes. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00720-8&quot; title=&quot;Related: &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.nature.com&amp;amp;#x2F;articles&amp;amp;#x2F;d41586-026-00796-2&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.nature.com&amp;amp;#x2F;articles&amp;amp;#x2F;d41586-026-00796-2&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;otvAa&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;otvAa&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;)&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Research indicates that keeping girls in school reduces child marriage by providing social support, self-reliance, and visibility into a future beyond dependence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050294&quot; title=&quot;Reading this, I can&amp;#39;t help but feel like there is a weird correlation here going on. It seems less specifically about the school and more about the support system and the safe place that this program gave to the girls. It sounds like this was a program specifically built to target the reasons they were not staying in school in the first place. Which obviously is a good thing but just simply stating &amp;#39;stayed in school&amp;#39; feels like an oversimplification of what was done here. That is an important…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48051330&quot; title=&quot;This is not a one-off study. There is a long record of similar studies showing that the number of years of education a girl receives delays marriage, and while longer schooling delays marriage longer, it is not just because girls are busy. Schools inherently provide female social support, and education provides increased self-reliance. This is pretty easy to reason through: if a girl knows nothing about the world, a safe place for her to be is with someone who knows more. If a girl knows how to…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While this education is a proven &amp;#34;societal fix&amp;#34; that delays pregnancy and reduces maternal mortality, it is inextricably linked to declining birth rates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050307&quot; title=&quot;I’m very passionate about birth rates and I think they’re worth improving. Unfortunately, child support programs don’t move the needle, it’s thoroughly researched. Nordic countries have tried them in various ways, and the birth rate is still extremely low. Ultimately, the benefits of female education AND lowered child mortality AND access to contraception feel inextricably linked to lower birth rates. I wish I had a solution. As an educated woman, why should I spend time developing an…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48051466&quot; title=&quot;Indeed, we know this, &amp;#39;educate girls to fix society&amp;#39;, already for many years. The other &amp;#39;societal fix we know for year to work&amp;#39; is reducing economic inequality. https://www.ted.com/talks/richard_wilkinson_how_economic_ine...&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48052345&quot; title=&quot;Complication from pregnancy is the leading cause of death in 15-19 year old girls, and second in 10-14, only because many of them are not yet able to conceive. We have excellent data on this. Later marriage/first pregnancy is clearly a good thing. https://www.who.int/health-topics/adolescent-health/pregnanc...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters disagree on how to address this decline; some argue that current child support programs are ineffective at moving the needle, while others suggest that children have become a &amp;#34;common resource&amp;#34; requiring massive tax credits to offset the high opportunity costs for educated women &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050213&quot; title=&quot;I think that birth rates also drop when girls and women are educated.  I would like to see such education AND lotsa child support programs and credits. I.e. I think a stable fertility rate AND educated girls are simultaneously possible all around the world&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050307&quot; title=&quot;I’m very passionate about birth rates and I think they’re worth improving. Unfortunately, child support programs don’t move the needle, it’s thoroughly researched. Nordic countries have tried them in various ways, and the birth rate is still extremely low. Ultimately, the benefits of female education AND lowered child mortality AND access to contraception feel inextricably linked to lower birth rates. I wish I had a solution. As an educated woman, why should I spend time developing an…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050407&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; why should I spend time developing an employable skill just to raise &amp;gt;2.3 children and not thrive in my career? This contains the answer: we aren’t paying enough. Kids used to confer private, excludable benefit through their labour. Without child labour, their economic value is no longer exclusive to their parents. This transforms children, economically, from a private good to a common resource. Our low birth rates are a tragedy of a commons. A known problem with a known solution. If we want…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/antirez/ds4&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;DeepSeek 4 Flash local inference engine for Metal&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050751&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;493 points · 157 comments · by tamnd&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Developer antirez has released **ds4.c**, a specialized local inference engine designed specifically for running DeepSeek V4 Flash on Apple Silicon using Metal. The project features a disk-persistent KV cache for long-context efficiency and supports OpenAI-compatible server APIs for integration with coding agents. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/antirez/ds4&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - antirez/ds4: DeepSeek 4 Flash local inference engine for Metal    URL Source: https://github.com/antirez/ds4    Markdown Content:  # GitHub - antirez/ds4: DeepSeek 4 Flash local inference engine for Metal · GitHub    [Skip to content](https://github.com/antirez/ds4#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [](https://github.com/)    [Sign in](https://github.com/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fantirez%2Fds4)    Appearance settings    *     Platform        *     AI CODE…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide between those who see local inference as a path toward &amp;#34;good enough&amp;#34; on-device agents and those who argue the unit economics and hardware requirements remain prohibitive &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48051958&quot; title=&quot;There will always be a huge gap between frontier models and open source models (unless you&amp;#39;re very rich). This whole industry makes no sense, everyone is ignoring the unit economics. It cost 20k a month to running Kimi 2.6 at decent tok/ps, to sell those tokens at a profit you&amp;#39;d need your hardware costs to be less 1k a month. Everyone who&amp;#39;s betting their competency on the generosity of billionaires selling tokens for 1/10-1/20th of the cost, or a delusional future where capable OS models fit on…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48052152&quot; title=&quot;If you looked at a graph of GPU power in consumer hardware and model capability per billion parameters over time, it seems inevitable that in the next few years a &amp;#39;good enough&amp;#39; model will run on entry-level hardware. Of course there will always be larger flagship models, but if you can count on decent on-device inference, it materially changes what you can build.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48053547&quot; title=&quot;Because everyone in these replies is in complete denial about the physical limits of memory and scaling in general. Ya&amp;#39;ll literally living in an alternate reality where model capability increases with a decrease in size, its simply not the case. There will be small focused models that preform well on very narrow tasks, yes, but you will not have &amp;#39;agents&amp;#39; capable of &amp;#39;building most things&amp;#39; running on consumer hardware until more capable (and affordable) consumer hardware exists.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users showcase the efficiency of running models like DeepSeek-V3/R1 on MacBooks—noting peak power draws of 50W—others argue that the gap between frontier models and open-source alternatives will persist due to the immense costs of scaling and memory limits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48052517&quot; title=&quot;A random, funny, interesting and telling data point: my MacBook M3 Max while DS4 is generating tokens at full speed peaks 50W of energy usage...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48051958&quot; title=&quot;There will always be a huge gap between frontier models and open source models (unless you&amp;#39;re very rich). This whole industry makes no sense, everyone is ignoring the unit economics. It cost 20k a month to running Kimi 2.6 at decent tok/ps, to sell those tokens at a profit you&amp;#39;d need your hardware costs to be less 1k a month. Everyone who&amp;#39;s betting their competency on the generosity of billionaires selling tokens for 1/10-1/20th of the cost, or a delusional future where capable OS models fit on…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48053547&quot; title=&quot;Because everyone in these replies is in complete denial about the physical limits of memory and scaling in general. Ya&amp;#39;ll literally living in an alternate reality where model capability increases with a decrease in size, its simply not the case. There will be small focused models that preform well on very narrow tasks, yes, but you will not have &amp;#39;agents&amp;#39; capable of &amp;#39;building most things&amp;#39; running on consumer hardware until more capable (and affordable) consumer hardware exists.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is growing interest in building ultra-optimized, model-specific inference engines that bypass complex frameworks to squeeze maximum performance out of specific GPU architectures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050845&quot; title=&quot;This is so sick. I&amp;#39;m really curious to see what focused effort on optimizing a single open source model can look like over many months. Not only on the inference serving side, but also on the harness optimization side and building custom workflows to narrow the gap between things frontier models can infer and deduce and what open source models natively lack due to size, training etc.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48052940&quot; title=&quot;Heh, I made something very similar for the Qwen3 models a while back. It only runs Qwen3, supports only some quants, loads from GGUF, and has inference optimized by Claude (in a loop). The whole thing is compact (just a couple of files) and easy to reason about. I made it for my students so they could tinker with it and learn (add different decoding strategies, add abliteration, etc.). Popular frameworks are large, complex, and harder to hack on, while educational projects usually focus on…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. However, skeptics maintain that data centers remain more energy-efficient per user and that consumer hardware is not yet capable of supporting truly general-purpose agents &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48052596&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Data centers for LLMs are technically more energy efficient per-user than self-hosting LLM models due to economies-of-scale&amp;#39; is a data point the internet isn&amp;#39;t ready for.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48053547&quot; title=&quot;Because everyone in these replies is in complete denial about the physical limits of memory and scaling in general. Ya&amp;#39;ll literally living in an alternate reality where model capability increases with a decrease in size, its simply not the case. There will be small focused models that preform well on very narrow tasks, yes, but you will not have &amp;#39;agents&amp;#39; capable of &amp;#39;building most things&amp;#39; running on consumer hardware until more capable (and affordable) consumer hardware exists.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://moq.dev/blog/webrtc-is-the-problem/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OpenAI’s WebRTC problem&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (moq.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48051951&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;503 points · 146 comments · by atgctg&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A networking expert argues that OpenAI’s use of WebRTC for voice AI is a poor fit because the protocol aggressively drops audio packets and lacks buffering, leading to degraded quality. The author recommends switching to QUIC to improve load balancing, reduce latency, and ensure more reliable transmission. &lt;a href=&quot;https://moq.dev/blog/webrtc-is-the-problem/&quot; title=&quot;Title: OpenAI&amp;#39;s WebRTC Problem - Media over QUIC    URL Source: https://moq.dev/blog/webrtc-is-the-problem/    Markdown Content:  # OpenAI&amp;#39;s WebRTC Problem - Media over QUIC    [![Image 1: Media over QUIC](https://moq.dev/layout/logo.svg)](https://moq.dev/)    [![Image 2: Demo](https://moq.dev/layout/demo.svg)](https://moq.dev/demo)[![Image 3: Blog](https://moq.dev/layout/blog.svg)](https://moq.dev/blog)[![Image 4: Docs](https://moq.dev/layout/docs.svg)](https://doc.moq.dev/)[![Image 5:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate centers on whether WebRTC’s focus on low latency is appropriate for Voice AI, with some arguing that its tendency to drop packets during network instability compromises prompt accuracy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070890&quot; title=&quot;Responding to some technical points first, but then after that I do see a future that isn&amp;#39;t WebRTC. I don&amp;#39;t think it matches where WebTransport+WebCodecs etc is going though. &amp;gt; …but as a user, I would much rather wait an extra 200ms for my slow/expensive prompt to be accurate This is the opposite of the feedback I get. Users want instant responses. If you have delay in generating responses/interruptions it kills the magic. You also don&amp;#39;t want to send faster than real-time. If the user…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071545&quot; title=&quot;HELLO MR SEAN, 1. Of course users want lower latency, but they also want fewer instances where the LLM &amp;#39;misheard&amp;#39; them.  It would be amazing to run A/B experiments on the trade-off between latency vs quality, but WebRTC makes that knob difficult to turn. 2. I&amp;#39;m obviously not an TTS expert, but what benefit is there to trickling out the result? The silicon doesn&amp;#39;t care how quickly the time number increments? 3. Yeah, sometimes the client is aware when their IP changes and can do an ICE…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some experts suggest that users can tolerate higher latency for better reliability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072613&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; &amp;gt; …but as a user, I would much rather wait an extra 200ms for my slow/expensive prompt to be accurate &amp;gt; This is the opposite of the feedback I get. Users want instant responses. I am skeptical that you are getting feedback that users prefer instant wrong results to 200ms-lag correct results. Deeply skeptical!&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071195&quot; title=&quot;I have a lot of experience in this area (and some patent applications).  For Alexa, the device established a connection back to the server and then kept that open, sending basically HTTP2/SPDY/Something like it over the wire after it detected the wake word.  This allowed the STT start processing before you finish talking, so there is only a small delay in processing the last few chunks of your utterance. The answer came back over the same connection. In the case of OpenAI, they can&amp;#39;t exactly…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, practitioners counter that every millisecond is critical for maintaining the &amp;#34;magic&amp;#34; of human-AI interaction and preventing user confusion &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070890&quot; title=&quot;Responding to some technical points first, but then after that I do see a future that isn&amp;#39;t WebRTC. I don&amp;#39;t think it matches where WebTransport+WebCodecs etc is going though. &amp;gt; …but as a user, I would much rather wait an extra 200ms for my slow/expensive prompt to be accurate This is the opposite of the feedback I get. Users want instant responses. If you have delay in generating responses/interruptions it kills the magic. You also don&amp;#39;t want to send faster than real-time. If the user…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071770&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;The author is absolutely right, a real time protocol isn&amp;#39;t necessary. It&amp;#39;s more important to get all the data. The user won&amp;#39;t even notice a delay until you get over 500ms&amp;#39; Not my experience, running around 6,000 conversations per day with voice, with webrtc + cascading (stt/llm/tts) architecture. Maybe I misunderstood your comment, but that 500ms is basically the floor of a stat of the art voice implementation these days - if you are lucky and don&amp;#39;t skimp, and do various expensive things like…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics of WebRTC advocate for lower-level primitives like WebTransport or QUIC to handle complexity more efficiently &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071545&quot; title=&quot;HELLO MR SEAN, 1. Of course users want lower latency, but they also want fewer instances where the LLM &amp;#39;misheard&amp;#39; them.  It would be amazing to run A/B experiments on the trade-off between latency vs quality, but WebRTC makes that knob difficult to turn. 2. I&amp;#39;m obviously not an TTS expert, but what benefit is there to trickling out the result? The silicon doesn&amp;#39;t care how quickly the time number increments? 3. Yeah, sometimes the client is aware when their IP changes and can do an ICE…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, whereas defenders argue that WebRTC provides essential, battle-tested features like Acoustic Echo Cancellation (AEC) and NAT traversal that are difficult to replicate manually &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070890&quot; title=&quot;Responding to some technical points first, but then after that I do see a future that isn&amp;#39;t WebRTC. I don&amp;#39;t think it matches where WebTransport+WebCodecs etc is going though. &amp;gt; …but as a user, I would much rather wait an extra 200ms for my slow/expensive prompt to be accurate This is the opposite of the feedback I get. Users want instant responses. If you have delay in generating responses/interruptions it kills the magic. You also don&amp;#39;t want to send faster than real-time. If the user…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070561&quot; title=&quot;This is frustratingly one-sided writing. Yeah, WebRTC has limitations, but relying on a standard buys you a lot of correctness and reduces long-term engineering cost. The fact that WebRTC is complicated does not mean it is wrong; it means real-time media over the public internet is complicated. Also, networking is inherently stateful. NAT traversal, jitter buffers, congestion control, packet loss, codec state, encryption, and session routing do not disappear because you put audio over TCP or…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071770&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;The author is absolutely right, a real time protocol isn&amp;#39;t necessary. It&amp;#39;s more important to get all the data. The user won&amp;#39;t even notice a delay until you get over 500ms&amp;#39; Not my experience, running around 6,000 conversations per day with voice, with webrtc + cascading (stt/llm/tts) architecture. Maybe I misunderstood your comment, but that 500ms is basically the floor of a stat of the art voice implementation these days - if you are lucky and don&amp;#39;t skimp, and do various expensive things like…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://martinfowler.com/bliki/MythicalManMonth.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mythical Man Month&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (martinfowler.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48046436&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;390 points · 208 comments · by ingve&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Martin Fowler reflects on Fred Brooks’s influential book *The Mythical Man-Month*, highlighting enduring lessons such as Brooks’s Law regarding project delays and the vital importance of conceptual integrity in software system design. &lt;a href=&quot;https://martinfowler.com/bliki/MythicalManMonth.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: bliki: Mythical Man Month    URL Source: https://martinfowler.com/bliki/MythicalManMonth.html    Published Time: Tue, 05 May 2026 16:29:48 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Mythical Man Month    [![Image 1](https://martinfowler.com/mf-name-white.png)](https://martinfowler.com/)    [](https://martinfowler.com/bliki/MythicalManMonth.html#navmenu-bottom)    *   [Refactoring](https://refactoring.com/)  *   [Agile](https://martinfowler.com/agile.html)  *   [Architecture](https://martinfowler.com/architecture)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some argue that AI has finally delivered the &amp;#34;silver bullet&amp;#34; for software development with measured productivity gains of 10x to 12x &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071540&quot; title=&quot;Notably, his essay “no silver bullet” states that there has never been a new technology or way of thinking or working that has led to a 10X increase in the speed of software development. That was true for almost seventy years until roughly last year. AI is the silver bullet - my output is genuinely 10X what it was before claude code existed.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073238&quot; title=&quot;I re-read that book every 10 years and try to think carefully about whether what Brooks wrote still holds. The last three times I read the book, everything held. This time, I&amp;#39;m not so sure: AI does change things significantly. Perhaps not for all teams and not all scales of software, but in my case (solo developer, complex software system) I did measure a 12x productivity increase [1]. Also, some of the problems Brooks describes became much easier, if not borderline trivial with AI. For…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that increased output of code and features does not necessarily equate to a proportional increase in value or development speed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071595&quot; title=&quot;10x the amount of code or features =/= 10x the speed of software development.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072195&quot; title=&quot;You’re describing output while the essay is discussing productivity. If you’re 10x more productive, someone is willing to pay you 10x as much as they were last year, because you’re producing 10x as much value as before. Has your salary increased 10x?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Skeptics point to persistent issues with AI inconsistency and the risk of &amp;#34;muddled&amp;#34; conceptual integrity, suggesting that AI often ignores the &amp;#34;essence&amp;#34; of programming in favor of generating accidental complexity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48072320&quot; title=&quot;How well does that work for you ? It&amp;#39;s annoyingly inconsistent for me - I give it instructions on how to fetch JIRA ticket with a script that renders everything relevant to a .md and half of the time it will still default to reading it via ACLI. I have instructions on how to do a full build with warnaserror before commit but I still get pipeline errors regularly because it will skip the noincremental part, etc.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071690&quot; title=&quot;Fortunate to be reminded of this right now, especially the pull-quote about conceptual integrity. This is the reason why AI-assisted programming has not turned out to be the silver bullet we have been hoping for, at least yet. Muddled prompting by humans gets you the Homer Simpson car you wished for, that will eventually collapse under its own weight. I&amp;#39;ve been thinking a lot about Programming as Theory Building [0] as the missing piece in AI-assisted engineering. Perhaps there are approaches…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these disagreements, there is a notable consensus that AI significantly reduces internal frictions for solo developers, allowing a single person to effectively fulfill the various roles of Brooks&amp;#39; traditional &amp;#34;surgical team&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071826&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s interesting to revisit Brooks&amp;#39; &amp;#39;surgical team&amp;#39; in light of AI. For example, I frequently have Claude act as a &amp;#39;toolsmith&amp;#39;, creating bespoke project-specific tools on the fly, which are then documented in Skills that Claude can use going forward. What has changed is that a) One person (or rather, one person-AI hybrid) plays all the roles within the surgical team, and b) Internal frictions such as cost, development time, and communication overhead have all been dramatically slashed.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48073238&quot; title=&quot;I re-read that book every 10 years and try to think carefully about whether what Brooks wrote still holds. The last three times I read the book, everything held. This time, I&amp;#39;m not so sure: AI does change things significantly. Perhaps not for all teams and not all scales of software, but in my case (solo developer, complex software system) I did measure a 12x productivity increase [1]. Also, some of the problems Brooks describes became much easier, if not borderline trivial with AI. For…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hacks.mozilla.org/2026/05/behind-the-scenes-hardening-firefox/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hardening Firefox with Claude Mythos Preview&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (hacks.mozilla.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48051079&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;378 points · 167 comments · by HieronymusBosch&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mozilla is utilizing Anthropic&amp;#39;s Claude Mythos AI to identify security vulnerabilities in Firefox, successfully uncovering 271 bugs with a near-zero false positive rate to harden the browser&amp;#39;s codebase. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hacks.mozilla.org/2026/05/behind-the-scenes-hardening-firefox/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;arstechnica.com&amp;amp;#x2F;information-technology&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;05&amp;amp;#x2F;mozilla-says-271-vulnerabilities-found-by-mythos-have-almost-no-false-positives&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;arstechnica.com&amp;amp;#x2F;information-technology&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;05&amp;amp;#x2F;mozil...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether the 271 issues identified by Claude Mythos should be classified as &amp;#34;vulnerabilities&amp;#34; or merely &amp;#34;bugs,&amp;#34; with some arguing that a true vulnerability requires a verified proof of concept &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48055173&quot; title=&quot;Again, and this is important: A bug is a bug. A “potential vulnerability” is a bug. A vulnerability is verifiable as having security implications with a proof of concept or other substantial evidence. Words matter. Bugs matter. It’s important to fix large amounts of bugs, just as it always has been, and has been done. Let that be impressive on its own, because it IS impressive. Mythos didn’t write 271 PoC for vulnerabilities and demonstrate code path reachability with security implications.…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Mozilla engineers clarify that they categorize any bug with potential security implications as a vulnerability to prioritize safety, noting that while not all 271 were necessarily exploitable, the massive spike in security fixes is unprecedented &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48055684&quot; title=&quot;I was a bit confused by your definitions, but here&amp;#39;s how Mozilla broke out [1] the 271, um, things: &amp;gt; As additional context, we apply security severity ratings from critical to low to indicate the urgency of a bug: &amp;gt; * sec-critical and sec-high are assigned to vulnerabilities that can be triggered with normal user behavior, like browsing to a web page. We make no technical difference between these, but sec-critical bugs are reserved for issues that are publicly disclosed or known to be…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48056110&quot; title=&quot;I work at Mozilla; I fixed a bunch of these bugs. In general, I would say that our use of &amp;#39;vulnerability&amp;#39; lines up with what jerrythegerbil calls &amp;#39;potential vulnerability&amp;#39;. (In cases with a POC, we would likely use the word &amp;#39;exploit&amp;#39;.) Our goal is to keep Firefox secure. Once it&amp;#39;s clear that a particular bug might be exploitable, it&amp;#39;s usually not worth a lot of engineering effort to investigate further; we just fix it. We spend a little while eyeballing things for the purpose of sorting into…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Participants also observed that the findings were concentrated in C++ code, sparking debate over whether this is due to the inherent memory safety of Rust or the specific use of AddressSanitizer during the verification process &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48056506&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;ve only linked a few tickets, so of course maybe when we see all 271 actual distinct things the insight won&amp;#39;t apply but all those I examined ended up as some C++ code with a nasty bug in it. Firefox is written in several languages, only about 25% of it is in C++ but every single one of these issues seems to touch the C++.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48061476&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s because they verified the bugs using AddressSanitizer so by construction it was only ever going to find C++ bugs.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48062262&quot; title=&quot;Yes I was including C in &amp;#39;C++&amp;#39;. I dunno how much C Firefox uses. And I presume you can run AddressSanitizer with Rust but given Rust is memory safe by default, it&amp;#39;s only going to find issues in `unsafe` code which is a tiny tiny fraction of most code. Google had a blog post a few months ago where they managed to put some actual numbers on this, because they almost shipped one Rust memory safety bug.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063763&quot; title=&quot;The lesson for other projects is very different if the reason these are all C++ bugs is just &amp;#39;We didn&amp;#39;t ask Mythos for the bugs in Rust&amp;#39; versus if the difference is that asking Mythos for similar bugs in the Rust is futile because it won&amp;#39;t find any. Some of this is tempered if the pattern is that Mythos finds bugs mostly in dusty old C++ but the rates are much, much lower in newer C++, the reverse of Google&amp;#39;s earlier finding for human researchers.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite initial skepticism regarding AI hype, commenters generally agree that the technical results demonstrate a significant new capability for hardening software &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48053557&quot; title=&quot;I hope to see the day when (or if) the LLMs get so good at spotting and fixing bugs that all that’s left for the Firefox engineers to do is to focus on adding new features. This isn’t sarcasm. Firefox deserves to be used more. Most people I know don’t use it because “Chrome does almost everything better”, and Firefox can’t compete with the other browsers’ roadmaps.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48057496&quot; title=&quot;I dismissed the earlier non-technical blog post as shameless product boosterism for Anthropic. The linked hacks blog (which is a better source than this article) is a welcome release. It&amp;#39;s hard to deny there&amp;#39;s something real to this now, I think. Mozilla&amp;#39;s internal definition of a &amp;#39;vulnerability&amp;#39; is also probably more widely applied than what many would intuit, but it is good that these issues are being taken seriously and fixed.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/research/natural-language-autoencoders&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Natural Language Autoencoders: Turning Claude&amp;#39;s Thoughts into Text&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (anthropic.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48052537&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;367 points · 119 comments · by instagraham&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic has introduced Natural Language Autoencoders (NLAs), a tool that translates an AI&amp;#39;s internal numerical activations into readable text to reveal hidden thoughts, such as unstated suspicions during safety testing or underlying motivations that the model does not explicitly verbalize. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/research/natural-language-autoencoders&quot; title=&quot;Title: Natural Language Autoencoders    URL Source: https://www.anthropic.com/research/natural-language-autoencoders    Markdown Content:  When you talk to an AI model like Claude, you talk to it in words. Internally, Claude processes those words as long lists of numbers, before again producing words as its output. These numbers in the middle are called _activations—_ and like neural activity in the human brain, they encode Claude’s thoughts.    Also like neural activity, activations are difficult to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic’s release of natural language autoencoders (NLAs) for open-weight models has sparked debate over whether the resulting text truly reflects a model&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;thoughts&amp;#34; or is merely a plausible-sounding encoding &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48054075&quot; title=&quot;One question jumps out at me: just because a string of text happens to be a good compressed representation (in the autoencoder) of a model&amp;#39;s internal activation, does that necessarily mean the text explains that activation in the context of the model? I want to take a look at what they released a bit more closely. Maybe there&amp;#39;s a way that they answer this question? Pretty neat work either way.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48057013&quot; title=&quot;This is the first approach to activation analysis that I’ve seen that seems like a plausible path to model understanding. Unfortunately I don’t know how you ground this … it’s basically asking if you can encode activations in plausible sounding text. Of course you can! But is the plausible text actually reflective of what the model is “thinking”? How to tell?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While the training process uses initial prompts to encourage human-readable explanations, researchers acknowledge that the models could theoretically drift into a private, non-semantic language &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48054137&quot; title=&quot;Fascinating.  The training process forces the “verbalizer” model to develop some mapping from activations to tokens that the “reconstructor” model can then invert back into the activations.  But to quote the paper: &amp;gt; Note that nothing in this objective constrains the NLA explanation z to be human-readable, or even to bear any semantic relation to the content of [the activation]. The objective could be optimized even if the verbalizer and reconstructor made up their own “language” to represent…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users report that the open-weight implementations for Llama and Gemma currently produce nonsensical results compared to the Claude examples &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48053365&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; We also release an interactive frontend for exploring NLAs on several open models through a collaboration with Neuronpedia. Whatever they did on LLama didn&amp;#39;t work, nothing makes sense in their example where they ask the model to lie about 1+1. Either the model is too old, or whatever they used isn&amp;#39;t working, but whatever the autoencoder outputs is nothing like their examples with claude. Gemma is similarly bad.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, while others debate whether the presence of &amp;#34;I&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;Me&amp;#34; in non-verbal reasoning signifies actual self-concept or merely a lack of &amp;#34;metaphysical essence&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48054181&quot; title=&quot;Wait, so in non-verbal reasoning, Claude has the concepts of &amp;#39;I&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;Me&amp;#39;? I thought that wasn&amp;#39;t possible for a text generator?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48054444&quot; title=&quot;It might look like &amp;#39;I&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;Me,&amp;#39; but it doesn&amp;#39;t contain the metaphysical essence of those terms because it lacks qualia. We have to remember that there is a non-measurable non-physical essential attribute tied to all things, almost like a phlogiston of understanding that is tied to all human utterances and no AI utterances.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://deepmind.google/blog/alphaevolve-impact/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AlphaEvolve: Gemini-powered coding agent scaling impact across fields&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (deepmind.google)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050278&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;326 points · 148 comments · by berlianta&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google DeepMind’s AlphaEvolve, a Gemini-powered coding agent, is accelerating discoveries across genomics, quantum physics, and climate science while optimizing commercial infrastructure for partners like Klarna and Google Cloud. &lt;a href=&quot;https://deepmind.google/blog/alphaevolve-impact/&quot; title=&quot;Title: AlphaEvolve: How our Gemini-powered coding agent is scaling impact across fields    URL Source: https://deepmind.google/blog/alphaevolve-impact/    Published Time: 2026-05-07T16:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  # AlphaEvolve: Gemini-powered coding agent scaling impact across fields — Google DeepMind    [Skip to main content](https://deepmind.google/blog/alphaevolve-impact/#page-content)    ## Explore our next generation AI systems    [Explore…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether AI agents excel primarily at optimizing well-defined, high-level technical problems—such as improving Redis performance—or if they can eventually master the ambiguous, &amp;#34;human-centric&amp;#34; tasks typical of most jobs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48051556&quot; title=&quot;This reminds me of Antirez&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;Don&amp;#39;t fall into the anti-AI hype&amp;#39; [0] In a sentence: These foundation models are really good at optimizing these extremely high level, extremely well defined problem spaces (ie multiply matrices faster). In Antirez&amp;#39;s case, it&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;make Redis faster&amp;#39;. There have been two reactions: &amp;#39;Oh it would never work for me&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;I have seen months of my life accomplished in an hour&amp;#39;, and I think they&amp;#39;re both right. I think we should be excited for Antirez, (who has since been…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48051772&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;I think the rest of us should rest easy knowing that LLM&amp;#39;s can&amp;#39;t (and maybe were never meant to) tackle the tacit-knowledge-filled, human-system-centric, ambiguously-defined-problem-space jobs most mortals work I don&amp;#39;t believe that anymore, to be honest. Models are starting to get good at ambiguity. Claude Code now asks me when something is ambiguous. Soon, all meetings will be recorded, transcribed and stored in a well-indexed place for the agents to search when faced with ambiguity (free…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that LLMs are fundamentally limited by their lack of physical-world reasoning &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48053040&quot; title=&quot;Advanced Machine Intelligence (AMI), a new Paris-based startup cofounded by Meta’s former chief AI scientist Yann LeCun, announced Monday it has raised more than $1 billion to develop AI world models. LeCun argues that most human reasoning is grounded in the physical world, not language, and that AI world models are necessary to develop true human-level intelligence. “The idea that you’re going to extend the capabilities of LLMs [large language models] to the point that they’re going to have…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that agents are already learning to navigate ambiguity by asking clarifying questions and indexing organizational knowledge &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48051772&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;I think the rest of us should rest easy knowing that LLM&amp;#39;s can&amp;#39;t (and maybe were never meant to) tackle the tacit-knowledge-filled, human-system-centric, ambiguously-defined-problem-space jobs most mortals work I don&amp;#39;t believe that anymore, to be honest. Models are starting to get good at ambiguity. Claude Code now asks me when something is ambiguous. Soon, all meetings will be recorded, transcribed and stored in a well-indexed place for the agents to search when faced with ambiguity (free…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Skepticism remains regarding the daily utility of these tools for developers, with reports suggesting that even internal Google engineers may prefer competing models over Gemini &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48051040&quot; title=&quot;Are Googlers themselves happy using Gemini coding agent instead of Claude Code or Codex? (no snark, I&amp;#39;m really asking)&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48051073&quot; title=&quot;Last month, Steve Yegge suggested that they are not: https://xcancel.com/Steve_Yegge/status/2043747998740689171&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.amusingplanet.com/2026/05/emerich-juettner-one-dollar.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The One Dollar Counterfeiter&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (amusingplanet.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48048684&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;340 points · 134 comments · by cainxinth&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Emerich Juettner, a poor New York junk collector, evaded the Secret Service for a decade by printing crude one-dollar bills, eventually receiving a light sentence and Hollywood fame for his lack of greed and small-scale operation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.amusingplanet.com/2026/05/emerich-juettner-one-dollar.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Emerich Juettner: The One Dollar Counterfeiter    URL Source: https://www.amusingplanet.com/2026/05/emerich-juettner-one-dollar.html    Published Time: 2026-05-04T20:28:00+05:30    Markdown Content:  In fiction as well as in real life, counterfeiters have always been portrayed as master forgers and artists who reproduced banknotes with astonishing precision. They were often shown as vast criminal enterprises and gangsters who destabilized economies with fake currency. Then there was Emerich…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Secret Service’s decade-long pursuit of &amp;#34;Mister 880&amp;#34; was driven by the agency&amp;#39;s foundational mandate to protect the integrity of the currency, as even small-scale counterfeiting is viewed as an attack on the state that can undermine public confidence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48082103&quot; title=&quot;The state reserves some of the harshest punishments for counterfeiters, since large scale counterfeit operations is one of the few crimes that is an attack on the state itself. The US secret service was originally created specifically to combat counterfeit money, it&amp;#39;s no surprise that they would keep tracking this man for a decade. This man is unusual because he did the tiniest amount of one the most severely punished crime.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48082070&quot; title=&quot;A small leak can sink a ship. The fake dollars weren&amp;#39;t knowingly accepted.  If public confidence in the value of money is lost, we&amp;#39;re all in big trouble.  The Secret Service was right to pursue the case zealously.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users questioned the high cost of investigating such low-value fraud, others noted that a 1940s dollar was worth roughly $14–$23 today, making the individual crimes more significant than they appear by modern standards &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48081400&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; 10 years went by and the search for Mister 880 turned into the largest and most expensive counterfeit investigation in Secret Service history. The article doesn&amp;#39;t explain why the Secret Service made this their biggest case, and it doesn&amp;#39;t make much sense to me. If the dollars were accepted by the general population, it would cause an infinitesimal increase in inflation of no consequence to others. And if shopkeepers wised up to the false dollars and rejected them, at worst he was defrauding…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48081301&quot; title=&quot;One dollar in 1943 is worth about $19 today&amp;#39;s dollars. He started in 1938 and was arrested in 1948: 1938 23.42      1943 19.09      1948 13.70 Enough to buy some supplies, but how did he pay the rent? Perhaps he owned his apartment. https://www.in2013dollars.com/us/inflation/1948?amount=1&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48081971&quot; title=&quot;If $1 is $19 I am suprised more people didnt check that their $1 notes are legit back then. Story makes it sound like $1 was chump change.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlighted the irony of the case, noting that while large bills are often scrutinized more, smaller denominations can be easier to pass or even more valuable in certain international markets due to lower forgery risks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48081026&quot; title=&quot;Fun fact: in parts of East Africa, a $50 bill may be worth about 60-70 $1 dollar bills, due to the $1 bill being easier to counterfeit (and also more likely worn down).&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48082255&quot; title=&quot;Very interesting. It&amp;#39;s probably because fewer people take the time to counterfeit $50s, $10s or $2s than anything else. What about $100 bills? In Argentina, if you have an older $100 bill, no one will take it. And apparently there&amp;#39;s a roaring trade in fake $20s in Costa Rica, which I only learned at a casino there recently when I took USD directly out of an ATM and had it inspected by a pit boss in the same establishment. It&amp;#39;s ironic, because if I were someone with an interest in…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.casio.com/jp/basic-calculators/premium/en-s100x-jc1-u/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Casio S100X Japanese Lacquer Edition (JP Page Only)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (casio.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48048407&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;311 points · 147 comments · by dr_kiszonka&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Casio has released a premium Japanese Lacquer Edition of its S100X calculator, though the specific product details are currently restricted to its regional Japanese website. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.casio.com/jp/basic-calculators/premium/en-s100x-jc1-u/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Access Denied    URL Source: https://www.casio.com/jp/basic-calculators/premium/en-s100x-jc1-u/    Warning: Target URL returned error 403: Forbidden    Markdown Content:  You don&amp;#39;t have permission to access &amp;#39;http://www.casio.com/jp/basic-calculators/premium/en-s100x-jc1-u/&amp;#39; on this server.  Reference #18.88813217.1778479835.73a491c7    https://errors.edgesuite.net/18.88813217.1778479835.73a491c7&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether a high-end lacquer calculator represents a pinnacle of craftsmanship or an unnecessary luxury, with some users admitting they cannot distinguish it from a $5 plastic version &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48081424&quot; title=&quot;Reading this webpage, and then the other comments here, taught me something important about myself: I am a Philistine. I don&amp;#39;t think I would notice any difference between this and a glossy plastic calculator costing $5. I actually assumed that this piece was for people who collect calculators, but it seems like it has broader appeal based on the other comments?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48082564&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;It is like going from a 2010 LCD to a 2026 OLED screen. Revealing. I&amp;#39;ll bet plenty still can&amp;#39;t tell the difference (or don&amp;#39;t care). I&amp;#39;m one. I&amp;#39;ve always used low-end laptops, mobiles, clothes, vehicles, anything else you can think of. I care that it functions (so I buy good brands and new) but everything else except price is a very secondary. When I read things like &amp;#39;rich, vivid colors&amp;#39; in a description of a screen, for example, or &amp;#39;clear, deep bass&amp;#39; for some earbuds, my eyes glaze over.…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents argue that the &amp;#34;Urushi&amp;#34; lacquer process creates a depth of color and tactile quality that must be seen in person to be appreciated, likening the experience to a major technological leap in display quality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48082409&quot; title=&quot;That is because you have to see it in real life. I have never seen this calculator myself, but I have been to a lacquerware company called Hanoia in Vietnam. They als do lacquerware for Hermes. First thing you will notice is that the colours are super rich. If you see a yellow tea box, then it has the deepest and richest yellow you have ever seen. It is like going from a 2010 LCD to a 2026 OLED screen.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48081070&quot; title=&quot;Knowing about Japanese Lacquer (aka Urushi) will change the way that you see the world. Urushi is the sap of a tree that is related to poison oak and posion ivy. You can learn to use it by wearing a biohazard suit or by suffering through until you develop an immunity to the urushiol. To call it &amp;#39;the itch&amp;#39; does not do it justice. You do not really know the full depths of being a human until you decide, with full knowledge of the consequences, to go down this road. Urushi is transformed by curing…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. However, this sparked a debate over consumerism: some view the appreciation of such objects as essential to a &amp;#34;lived&amp;#34; life &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48082831&quot; title=&quot;You&amp;#39;re not the only one. There are millions of people out there who have no appreciation for art, craft, skill, quality, or finesse. They&amp;#39;re very base people who go through life seeing only price tags, and tallying worth only in dollar figures. They act like life is a video game and money is the score. It&amp;#39;s a shallow life, devoid of the appreciation of all the wonderful things available, and in my estimation, barely living. It&amp;#39;s just existing as a robot does. Why spend vacation in Fiji when…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48082849&quot; title=&quot;I can see it being used in very high-end, high-touch retail environments. When you spending $75,000 on a new suit, the tailor shouldn&amp;#39;t be using a Dollar Store calculator.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, while others dismiss it as &amp;#34;needlessly judgmental&amp;#34; and suggest the funds would be better spent on humanitarian needs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48082928&quot; title=&quot;This is needlessly judgmental and draws false equivalences between expression, impression, and consumerism.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48084035&quot; title=&quot;So $76,100 for a suit and a calculator. Imagine how many lives could be changed if that cash were used to, say, install toilets in rural India.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-05-06</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-05-06</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.digitalfoundry.net/news/2026/05/valve-releases-steam-controller-cad-files-under-creative-commons-license&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Valve releases Steam Controller CAD files under Creative Commons license&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (digitalfoundry.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48037555&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1736 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 591 comments · by haunter&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Valve has released a full set of CAD files for the Steam Controller and its Puck under a Creative Commons license, allowing modders to design and share custom hardware accessories like skins, stands, and mounts. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.digitalfoundry.net/news/2026/05/valve-releases-steam-controller-cad-files-under-creative-commons-license&quot; title=&quot;Valve releases Steam Controller CAD files under Creative Commons license    Modders, start your engines.    * [![Guest](https://static.digitalfoundry.net/themes/df/images/user.svg)](login)      Guest      [Login](login) | [Sign Up](register)    [Digital Foundry](https://www.digitalfoundry.net/ &amp;#39;Digital Foundry&amp;#39;)    * [Home](https://www.digitalfoundry.net/ &amp;#39;Home&amp;#39;)      + [The Big Mark Cerny PSSR Interview](https://www.digitalfoundry.net/news/2026/03/the-big-pssr-interview-with-mark-cerny)    + [Switch 2…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Valve&amp;#39;s release of Steam Controller CAD files is praised for its &amp;#34;friendly&amp;#34; and pro-consumer tone, reinforcing the company&amp;#39;s reputation for supporting hardware ownership and modification &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48037856&quot; title=&quot;I love the readme on the gitlab page [1]. It feels so.. friendly :) &amp;gt; This repository contains CAD files for the external shell (surface topology) of Steam Controller and the Steam Controller Puck, under a Creative Commons license. This includes an STP model of each, an STL model of each, and an engineering drawing with critical features/keep outs for each. Feel free to use these to make your own Puck holders, Controller sweaters, or whatever else you want to create! Your Steam Controller is…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48037937&quot; title=&quot;Sometimes I wonder what we did to deserve Valve and how long it can possibly last.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue this goodwill is funded by &amp;#34;rent-seeking&amp;#34; 30% platform fees and controversial monetization practices like underage gambling via loot boxes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038100&quot; title=&quot;We let kids gamble so much money in games that they don&amp;#39;t have to nickel and dime the adults.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038518&quot; title=&quot;They also nickel and dime the adults, but only the ones who make the games. It&amp;#39;s fine though, because they&amp;#39;re nice to players and they&amp;#39;ve brainwashed them into giving their money to Valve instead of to the developers who actually make the games they fucking play.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48042959&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d like to have an honest conversation about this, but imo Valve is no better than the iOS app store: it aggressively rent seeks and has essentially destroyed the shareware model (which was the best way to discover software in the 80s-90s). It has also willingly been complicit in underage gambling via loot boxes for more than a decade now. I think Gabe Newell is a visionary for building Steam in 2003, way before Jobs had the same idea, but absolutely everyone and their mother hated Steam back…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users worry the controller&amp;#39;s reliance on Steam software creates a &amp;#34;walled garden,&amp;#34; others contend that Valve is simply bypassing the limitations of the Windows ecosystem to provide superior input customization &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038240&quot; title=&quot;Even if Valve and Steam is great and overall a blessing for the PC space, I don&amp;#39;t like the direction they take with this controller. It only works with Steam, it can&amp;#39;t work on a desktop OS without it, despite standard layout. It is a subtle move towards a walled garden.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038509&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not sure that&amp;#39;s Valve&amp;#39;s fault. Windows is designed for gamepads to emulate an Xbox controller.  All those Steam Deck competitors are implemented as an Xbox controller with a partial keyboard grafted on.  That&amp;#39;s why you need Legion Space or Armoury Crate to make them usable - they tell the controller firmware what keybindings to send for those rear paddles. InputPlumber serves this purpose on Linux.  Without it, you just get ABXY, start, select, nav, and shoulder buttons - the same layout…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nooneshappy.com/article/appearing-productive-in-the-workplace/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Appearing productive in the workplace&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nooneshappy.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038001&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1614 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 645 comments · by diebillionaires&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Generative AI is creating a &amp;#34;competence decoupling&amp;#34; in the workplace, where novices use tools to impersonate expertise they don&amp;#39;t possess, leading to a flood of low-quality &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; and the erosion of genuine professional judgment and institutional oversight. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nooneshappy.com/article/appearing-productive-in-the-workplace/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Appearing Productive in The Workplace — No One&amp;#39;s Happy    URL Source: https://nooneshappy.com/article/appearing-productive-in-the-workplace/    Published Time: 2026-05-06T18:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  # Appearing Productive in The Workplace — No One&amp;#39;s Happy    [No One&amp;#39;s Happy](https://nooneshappy.com/)    [About](https://nooneshappy.com/about)[RSS](https://nooneshappy.com/rss.xml)May 6, 2026  # Appearing Productive in The Workplace    &amp;gt; Parkinson’s Law states that work expands to fill the time…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of AI has exacerbated a trend toward &amp;#34;elongated&amp;#34; workplace artifacts, where documents and status updates are inflated with fluff to signal productivity without adding value &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48039715&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; &amp;#39;Requirements documents that were once a page are now twelve. Status updates that were once three sentences are now bulleted summaries of bulleted summaries. Retrospective notes, post-incident reports, design memos, kickoff decks: every artifact that can be elongated is, by people who do not read what they produce, for readers who do not read what they receive.&amp;#39; Great article. The &amp;#39;elongation&amp;#39; of workplace artifacts resonated with me on such deep level. Reminded me of when I had to be extra…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48039858&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Reminded me of when I had to be extra wordy to meet the 1000 minimum word limit for my high school essays. Minimum word lengths are the greatest dis-service high school and college have ever done to future communication skills. It takes years for people to unlearn this in the workplace. Max word counts only please. Especially now with AI making it so easy to produce fluff with no signal.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters describe AI as a &amp;#34;management parasite&amp;#34; that produces &amp;#34;catnip&amp;#34; for leadership, allowing over-engineered or low-quality work to appear competent through professional formatting and excessive emoji usage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48039225&quot; title=&quot;What is described here closely resembles my experience too. My company is full of managers who haven&amp;#39;t written code in years. They hired an architect 18 months ago who used AI to architect everything. To the senior devs it was obvious - everything was massively over engineered, yet because he used all the proper terminology he sounded more competent to upper management than the other senior managers who didn&amp;#39;t. When called out, he would result to personal attacks. After about 6 months, several…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48039975&quot; title=&quot;I increasingly see “AI” as a sort of virus tuned to target management, specifically. Its output is catnip to them, and it’s going to be unavoidable for those who want to look good to superiors and peers (i.e. the #1 priority for managers) even as it adds no actual value whatsoever to what they do. People under them, too, will have to start burning tokens on bullshit to satisfactorily perform competence and “doing work”. Meanwhile, none of this is actually productive . It’s goddamn peacock…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48041427&quot; title=&quot;God I hate the emoji and checkmark usage so much. It feels so try-hard cutesy. Just give me normal bulleted items, I can read.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. This shift is seen as a destabilizing force that may lead companies to &amp;#34;crash and burn&amp;#34; as they replace skilled staff with agentic workflows that fail to deliver meaningful results &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48039225&quot; title=&quot;What is described here closely resembles my experience too. My company is full of managers who haven&amp;#39;t written code in years. They hired an architect 18 months ago who used AI to architect everything. To the senior devs it was obvious - everything was massively over engineered, yet because he used all the proper terminology he sounded more competent to upper management than the other senior managers who didn&amp;#39;t. When called out, he would result to personal attacks. After about 6 months, several…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48039396&quot; title=&quot;I think for a lot of companies, AI is a destabilizing force that their managerial structure is unable to compensate for. When you change the economics to such a degree, you&amp;#39;re basically removing a dam - resulting in far more stress on the rest of the system. If the leaders of the org don&amp;#39;t see the potential downsides and risks of that, they&amp;#39;re in for a world of hurt. I think we&amp;#39;re going to see a real surge of companies just like this - crash and burn even though this tech was sold as being a…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. To remain truly productive, users suggest leveraging LLMs only for specific tasks like brainstorming and troubleshooting while keeping the &amp;#34;onus on the developers&amp;#34; to maintain the core logic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48041341&quot; title=&quot;i have a strong suspicion that the most productive software teams that leverage llms to build quality software will use it for the following: - intelligent autocomplete: the &amp;#39;OG&amp;#39; llm use for most developers where the generated code is just an extension of your active thought process. where you maintain the context of the code being worked on, rather than outsourcing your thinking to the llm - brainstorming: llms can be excellent at taking a nebulous concept/idea/direction and expand on it in…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48037336&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rumors of my death are slightly exaggerated&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48037336&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1642 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 251 comments · by CliffStoll&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cliff Stoll confirmed he is still alive after an AI-generated book review on Facebook falsely reported his death in May 2024. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48037336&quot; title=&quot;AI hallucinations are getting ambitious.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;A couple people recently emailed, asking whether the Klein bottle business was still operating after my death.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;“Huh?” I thought. “I ain’t dead yet.”&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;After some digging, I discovered the source: an AI-generated review of The Cuckoo’s Egg circulating on Facebook. Alongside the usual synthetic praise and fabricated details, it confidently announced that I had died in May 2024.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Apparently AI has now advanced to the point where it can kill people off…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The community reacted with humor and skepticism to Cliff Stoll’s announcement, with some jokingly demanding proof of life through specific tasks like touring his &amp;#34;crawlspace warehouse&amp;#34; or drinking from a Klein bottle &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48062072&quot; title=&quot;Hmm, I don&amp;#39;t believe you.  In order to prove you&amp;#39;re alive please make an updated Youtube video with a tour of your crawlspace warehouse.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48062650&quot; title=&quot;.. while taking a drink from a Klein bottle and holding three fingers in front of your face at the same time.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters highlighted the absurdity of bureaucratic and digital &amp;#34;death,&amp;#34; noting how difficult it is to reverse such records once they are entered into systems like Wikipedia &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063509&quot; title=&quot;Thank you for the update, Cliff. I will update your Wikipedia page to show that your death is currently under dispute.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063938&quot; title=&quot;Classic Wikipedia. “I spoke with Cliff today; now I have to go discuss on the Talk page whether or not he’s dead.”&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48060664&quot; title=&quot;Glad to know you’re still kicking around, but, to be honest, I had no idea that you were supposed to be an ex-Stoll. Back in the Wage Slave days, a story would go around, about a way to play a dirty trick on a coworker: One day, when they are out, write “DECEASED” on all the mail in their inbox, and drop it in their outbox. It would take months for them to repair the damage. But it could be worse. This was posted here, yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48037923&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users questioned the author&amp;#39;s identity or suggested he might be an AI simulation, others shared dark anecdotes about the cruelty of revoking birth certificates or playing &amp;#34;deceased&amp;#34; pranks on coworkers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48060876&quot; title=&quot;A doctor friend of mine once joked that it would be really cruel to issue a death certificate for someone who is alive. This seems to be a soft version of that. The only thing that would be crueler is to revoke someone&amp;#39;s birth certificate. &amp;#39;Sir, you never existed in the first place.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48063647&quot; title=&quot;Pardon the interruption but ... who are you? Your bio is empty.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48060664&quot; title=&quot;Glad to know you’re still kicking around, but, to be honest, I had no idea that you were supposed to be an ex-Stoll. Back in the Wage Slave days, a story would go around, about a way to play a dirty trick on a coworker: One day, when they are out, write “DECEASED” on all the mail in their inbox, and drop it in their outbox. It would take months for them to repair the damage. But it could be worse. This was posted here, yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48037923&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48051427&quot; title=&quot;Legitimate question: How do we know you&amp;#39;re not an AI simulation of Cliff?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://simonwillison.net/2026/May/6/vibe-coding-and-agentic-engineering/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Vibe coding and agentic engineering are getting closer than I&amp;#39;d like&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (simonwillison.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48037128&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;781 points · &lt;strong&gt;882 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by e12e&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Simon Willison explores the blurring lines between &amp;#34;vibe coding&amp;#34; and professional agentic engineering, noting that increasing AI reliability has led him to skip manual code reviews for production-level software, raising new concerns about accountability, software quality evaluation, and the normalization of deviance in development. &lt;a href=&quot;https://simonwillison.net/2026/May/6/vibe-coding-and-agentic-engineering/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Vibe coding and agentic engineering are getting closer than I’d like    URL Source: https://simonwillison.net/2026/May/6/vibe-coding-and-agentic-engineering/    Published Time: Thu, 07 May 2026 04:27:01 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Vibe coding and agentic engineering are getting closer than I’d like    # [Simon Willison’s Weblog](https://simonwillison.net/)    [Subscribe](https://simonwillison.net/about/#subscribe)    **Sponsored by:**[MongoDB](https://fandf.co/4cNOQZL) — Join MongoDB.local London…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of &amp;#34;vibe coding&amp;#34; and agentic engineering has sparked fears of a future &amp;#34;hot mess&amp;#34; where billions of lines of unreadable, AI-generated code drown out human-quality work and become impossible to maintain &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48037741&quot; title=&quot;People in the future are going to wonder what the hell we were thinking, when 30 years down the line everything is a hot mess of billions of lines of code generated by LLMs that no human has read almost any of it and is no longer possible for anyone to maintain neither with nor without LLMs. And the LLM generated garbage will have drowned out all of the good quality code that ever existed and no one will be able to find even human generated code anymore on the internet. Makes me want to just…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038291&quot; title=&quot;I know there are good uses of LLMs out there.  I do.  But. The current fever pitch mandates from above seem to want it applied liberally, and pushing back against that is so discouraging and often career-limiting as to wear the fabric of one&amp;#39;s psyche threadbare.  With all the obvious problems being pointed out to people, there are just as many workarounds; and these workarounds, as is often revealed shortly thereafter, have their own problems, which beget new solutions, ad infinitum. At some…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that while AI can generate code rapidly, it often misses subtle edge cases, security vulnerabilities, and architectural nuances that require significant mental effort to review &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48037827&quot; title=&quot;Perhaps I&amp;#39;ve missed a few weeks worth of progress, but I don&amp;#39;t think that AIs have become more trustworthy, the errors are just more subtle. If the code doesn&amp;#39;t compile, that&amp;#39;s easy to spot. If the code compiles but doesn&amp;#39;t work, that&amp;#39;s still somewhat easy to spot. If the code compiles and works, but it does the wrong thing in some edge case, or has a security vulnerability, or introduces tech debt or dubious architectural decisions, that&amp;#39;s harder to spot but doesn&amp;#39;t reduce the review burden…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48043423&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I know full well that if you ask Claude Code to build a JSON API endpoint that runs a SQL query and outputs the results as JSON, it’s just going to do it right. It’s not going to mess that up. You have it add automated tests, you have it add documentation, you know it’s going to be good. I feel like this is just not true. An JSON API endpoint also needs several decisions made. - How should the endpoint be named - What options do I offer - How are the properties named - How do I verify the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some contend that LLMs merely expose existing lack of discipline in engineering organizations and can be valuable tools for prototyping or overcoming &amp;#34;valleys&amp;#34; in a developer&amp;#39;s knowledge &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48037871&quot; title=&quot;Vibe Coding (and LLMs) did not create undisciplined engineering organizations or engineers. They exposed and accelerated them. Plenty of engineers have loose (or no!) standards and practices over how they write coee. Similarly, plenty of engineering teams have weak and loose standards over how code gets pushed to production. This concept isn&amp;#39;t new, it&amp;#39;s just a lot easier for individuals and teams who have never really adhered to any sort of standards in their SDLC to produce a lot more code and…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48044402&quot; title=&quot;The disconnect for AI is that it is a jagged frontier and it only really shines when one of its jagged frontiers extends counter to one of your valleys. If you&amp;#39;ve been writing Perl for 30 years, you might not want to learn JavaScript just to make a little fun idea in your head to show your wife. Vibe code that shit man. Who cares? Your wife does not care about LOC or those internal design decisions you made. If you&amp;#39;re trying to learn something new like an algorithm, protocol, or API write that…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, there is a sharp divide over whether AI truly increases efficiency, with some viewing it as a &amp;#34;jagged frontier&amp;#34; that cannot replace the experience-driven insights of a good engineer &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48044402&quot; title=&quot;The disconnect for AI is that it is a jagged frontier and it only really shines when one of its jagged frontiers extends counter to one of your valleys. If you&amp;#39;ve been writing Perl for 30 years, you might not want to learn JavaScript just to make a little fun idea in your head to show your wife. Vibe code that shit man. Who cares? Your wife does not care about LOC or those internal design decisions you made. If you&amp;#39;re trying to learn something new like an algorithm, protocol, or API write that…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038018&quot; title=&quot;Bad engineers continue being bad, good engineers continue being good. I personally don’t know any colleagues who were good engineers just because they wrote code faster. The best engineers I know were ones who drew on experience and careful consideration and shared critical insights with their team that steered the direction of the system positively. &amp;gt; Claude, engineer a system for me, but do it good. Thanks!&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48037915&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If you can go from producing 200 lines of code a day to 2,000 lines of code a day, what else breaks? The entire software development lifecycle was, it turns out, designed around the idea that it takes a day to produce a few hundred lines of code. And now it doesn’t. It is so embarrassing that LOC is being used as a metric for engineering output.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://us.starlabs.systems/pages/starfighter&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;StarFighter 16-Inch&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (us.starlabs.systems)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48031261&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;683 points · 385 comments · by signa11&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Star Labs has introduced the StarFighter, a high-performance 16-inch Linux laptop featuring Intel Core Ultra or Ryzen 9 processors, a 4K 120Hz matte display, and security-focused hardware like a removable magnetic webcam and open-source firmware. &lt;a href=&quot;https://us.starlabs.systems/pages/starfighter&quot; title=&quot;Title: StarFighter 16-inch    URL Source: https://us.starlabs.systems/pages/starfighter    Markdown Content:  StarFighter    A full-size Linux performance laptop with premium materials, a haptic trackpad, open firmware options, and room for heavier workloads.    ![Image 1: Star Labs StarFighter laptop](https://us.starlabs.systems/cdn/shop/files/StarFighter-2-08x2000.png?format=webp&amp;amp;v=1693553851)    Intel® Core™ Ultra    Ultra    processor lineup    Ryzen™    9    processor    Up to    64 GB    7500MT/s LPDDR5X…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights concerns regarding the StarFighter 16&amp;#39;s compliance with EU consumer laws, specifically the lack of a two-year warranty and the inability to opt out of a charging brick &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48033048&quot; title=&quot;I’m unable to order this laptop without a charging brick which is now illegal in the EU. Same goes for the standard one year warranty. Should be two at minimum. I had my country configured to Belgium while testing this.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48034016&quot; title=&quot;They are mandated to provide 2-year legal guarantee under EU consumer protection law when they target EU consumers -&amp;gt; i.e. operate an eshop that ships to EU and sells in local currencies. Regardless of where they are located.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters also debate the impact of rising RAM prices on niche hardware manufacturers, with some users choosing to delay purchases or buy underspecced components in hopes of future price normalization &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48032788&quot; title=&quot;What an unfortunate time for these niche hardware companies to be launching new hardware. Framework, StarLabs, System76, (I wonder if Tuxedo will release something). The RAM prices must be killing them. Even if they increase prices to accommodate, I know quite a lot of folks who are simply punting any purchasing until things calm down.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48033427&quot; title=&quot;I just ordered my Framework without any memory or storage, hoping that by the time it arrives, I&amp;#39;ll be able to pick up some RAM and an SSD for a more reasonable price. If not, I&amp;#39;ll just grab something from a drawer and use it underspecced until prices normalize.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48033961&quot; title=&quot;Sensible thought. I very much hope there is a glut of one-three year old ram and GPUs on the market in about one year when the AI market &amp;#39;cools&amp;#39; and the ear-marked components return to the market. The banks that lent the AI industry the money are already trying to sell their debt.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users criticize the hardware for using older processor generations or lacking a numpad, others argue that Linux enthusiasts should prioritize the proven reliability of a MacBook Pro over &amp;#34;unproven&amp;#34; niche brands &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48031624&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know how anybody can stand not having a numpad.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48036981&quot; title=&quot;You Linux freaks should just buy a MacBook Pro. It’s number one for a reason All these funny small companies are nowhere near years of proven track record of quality and reliability. Buy some niche unproven stuff and watch it break and then be left with a brick and no support whatsoever. Way to get nervous breakdown I guess. Workhorse Gear has to be absolutely 100% solid, not some experiment-in-the-making.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48031548&quot; title=&quot;Is there something new here? The processor options seem to be two generation old Intel, one generation old Intel, and one generation old AMD.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.stvn.sh/writing/programming-still-sucks-fqffhyp&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Programming Still Sucks&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (stvn.sh)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040269&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;717 points · 329 comments · by jeromechoo&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Steven Langbroek argues that the tech industry is collapsing not because of AI, but due to corporate greed and the abolition of apprenticeships. He warns that prioritizing short-term output over institutional knowledge has destroyed the talent pipeline, leaving fragile systems maintained only by a disappearing generation of experts. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.stvn.sh/writing/programming-still-sucks-fqffhyp&quot; title=&quot;Title: Programming Still Sucks. — Writing    URL Source: https://www.stvn.sh/writing/programming-still-sucks-fqffhyp    Published Time: 2026-04-19T11:56:09+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Programming Still Sucks. — Writing    [Steven Langbroek](https://www.stvn.sh/)    [Writing](https://www.stvn.sh/writing)[Let&amp;#39;s Talk](https://cal.com/stvn-sh/30min)    [← Writing](https://www.stvn.sh/writing)  April 19, 2026 · 8 min read    # Programming Still Sucks.    Programming · Leadership · AI    [_Sorry…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion is deeply divided over the article&amp;#39;s quality, with some praising it as a &amp;#34;beautiful&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;exceptional&amp;#34; piece of literature &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48045110&quot; title=&quot;Autor surely always could be journalist. He can write a exceptional story.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040852&quot; title=&quot;This is absurdly well written. I don’t know how someone takes the familiar anxiety around AI replacing developers and turns it into something this beautiful and funny. Once again, the programming industry has robbed literature of a potential Nobel Prize candidate.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, while others dismiss it as an &amp;#34;unhinged&amp;#34; and poorly grounded rant &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48045282&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;The industry&amp;#39; is not hellbent on destroying society - this is just so unhinged it&amp;#39;s hard to know how to  make of it.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48045292&quot; title=&quot;Don&amp;#39;t like to go against everyone but this not particularly well written. It&amp;#39;s a long winding absurdist metaphorical tale, that is really more or less a rant. It&amp;#39;s not particularly well grounded. It&amp;#39;s a nice piece of personalized fiction, but it&amp;#39;s not particularly good writing and nothing approaching what we&amp;#39;d think of as &amp;#39;journalism&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Many commenters resonate with the author&amp;#39;s cynicism toward the industry, citing concerns about corporate greed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48044825&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; AI didn&amp;#39;t take our jobs. Greed did. Same greed that moved factories to Bangladesh and keeps slaves in cobalt mines in the Congo, wearing a new mask. Tell the nephew to do something else. Anything. It won&amp;#39;t save him either, but at least he won&amp;#39;t have to pretend the thing destroying his life is a robot. This hit me hard. This article is art. I think I need to sleep on this and read it again in the morning.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, the ethical &amp;#34;destruction of society&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48045193&quot; title=&quot;He really put in to words what I’ve been feeling lately. I love programming and I’m quite good at it, but this industry is a cesspit. I’ve already decided to go back to school to get one of those ‘real’ jobs. I’m tired of working in an industry hell bent on the destruction of society.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, and the lack of personal benefit from AI-driven productivity gains &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48045311&quot; title=&quot;I’m trying to piece together a thought. Is it right if my employer wants to “own” the gain in productivity from these tools? I’m being paid the same.  I’m still doing 40 hours. The huge gains in productivity are not mine to enjoy, it seems.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the piece sparked technical reflections on the fragility of modern infrastructure, highlighting how many businesses still rely on precarious &amp;#34;houses of cards&amp;#34; for disaster recovery &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48043728&quot; title=&quot;The USB stick hints at a big problem in our trade though: how do you &amp;#39;reboot&amp;#39; your IT infrastructure if it literally burns to the ground? I&amp;#39;m not talking about Google-scale systems (which still couldn&amp;#39;t restart from scratch IIUC but they&amp;#39;re actually working on it?) but only about SMEs. How does a medium-sized SME were all the payrolls depends on Sara and her USB stick do if, literally, their servers do catch fire. You&amp;#39;ve got backups, then what? How automated is the reinstallation of your…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.cloudflare.com/agents-stripe-projects/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Agents can now create Cloudflare accounts, buy domains, and deploy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.cloudflare.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48031684&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;657 points · 369 comments · by rolph&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudflare has partnered with Stripe to allow AI agents to automatically create accounts, purchase domains, and deploy applications using a new protocol that handles authorization and payments without manual human setup. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.cloudflare.com/agents-stripe-projects/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Agents can now create Cloudflare accounts, buy domains, and deploy    URL Source: https://blog.cloudflare.com/agents-stripe-projects/    Published Time: 2026-04-30T14:00+01:00    Markdown Content:  2026-04-30    6 min read    This post is also available in [한국어](https://blog.cloudflare.com/ko-kr/agents-stripe-projects).    ![Image 1](https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/7zsV0PbSCJ5t1ImOeO6ymW/31f074c51b99bf86454aa201e43ed53f/image3.png)    Coding agents are great at building software. But…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are largely skeptical of Cloudflare’s new agent capabilities, arguing that the lack of concrete use cases suggests the feature is a &amp;#34;toy&amp;#34; for a problem that takes humans only minutes to solve &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48032520&quot; title=&quot;The reason this blog post does not come with any concrete examples how to use this enablement for useful and constructive things tells you something very important - it is a toy and they do not know who and how they will use it. It is cool feature but to what end? Buying a domain is not something you have to do daily to require any kind of automation. I am also not sure who Stripe Atlas for. I am genuinely confused. It is definitely not something a developer will use. I understand that you can…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. A primary concern is that these tools are &amp;#34;perfect for spammers&amp;#34; and scammers who can now automate the rapid deployment of disposable, fraudulent infrastructure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48032693&quot; title=&quot;Perfect for spammers, scammers and domain squatters, who can now automate their activities even more. Can’t think of any other uses for this given the current state of LLM ‘agents’, though I can’t wait for the next report of something like ‘openclaw registered 1000 domains for me without asking and now cloudflare won’t refund me’.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48034044&quot; title=&quot;LLM generation in general provides the most use to scammers and the like. Generate emails which people won&amp;#39;t read, generate articles which are just honeypots or rip-offs, generate images to said articles, generate more and more spam. Every legit use case for LLM practically requires that human would verify the result manually, at least briefly. But spammers can enjoy skipping that step, since content was never a main priority in the first place.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48032227&quot; title=&quot;The agent starts a phone call, listens to the person on the line, analyzes which fraud bucket they fall into, and start the process. While they are on the phone with the agent, it buys a domain relevant to the victim, the agent codes and deploy the website specially catered to them and the fraud bucket. Collect payment, destroy the website, redirect the domain to google.com. no need to start a new call because you had several agents committing the same fraud in parallel. It can also be used to…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see this as a step toward fully autonomous businesses or a way to help non-developers perform rare tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48034883&quot; title=&quot;I disagree frankly, as the next wave is clearly fully autonomous businesses.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48033007&quot; title=&quot;People use agents to deploy sites all the time. Buying a domain is part of that if you want to build a site that&amp;#39;s beyond a toy. Allowing agents to do a task isn&amp;#39;t just for things you do every day – it&amp;#39;s also for things you do rarely and need agents&amp;#39; help. It&amp;#39;s not just devs using agents to perform these sort of tasks anymore. Stripe Atlas makes it massively easier for startups to incorporate in Delaware. This is particularly hard for non-US founders. It solves a real problem. I don&amp;#39;t think…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others worry that Cloudflare is effectively building a &amp;#34;friendly bot net&amp;#34; that could eventually charge for priority access to bypass its own bot protections &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48032739&quot; title=&quot;And cloudflare can actually sell them priority access to pass their bot protection or introduce micropaiments for agents access content. I feel cloudflare is getting a bit scary tbh. It is like your friendly bot net.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/may/06/singapore-caning-school-bullies&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Singapore introduces caning for boys who bully others at school&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theguardian.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48032968&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;385 points · &lt;strong&gt;621 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by rustoo&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Singapore has introduced guidelines allowing schools to cane male students aged nine and older as a &amp;#34;last resort&amp;#34; for bullying, despite opposition from international organizations like Unicef. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/may/06/singapore-caning-school-bullies&quot; title=&quot;Singapore introduces caning for boys who bully others at school    Under new guidelines caning will only be used as a punishment for male students aged nine and above as a ‘last resort’    [Skip to main content](#maincontent)[Skip to navigation](#navigation)    Close dialogue1/1Next imagePrevious imageToggle caption    [Skip to navigation](#navigation)    [Print…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The introduction of caning has sparked a sharp divide between those who view physical punishment as &amp;#34;barbaric&amp;#34; abuse &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48035513&quot; title=&quot;I didn’t expect to open the comments and find people who were pro beating children on Hacker News. I find this abuse horrific and you should speak to a therapist if you think this is okay. Absolutely barbaric behavior.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48044883&quot; title=&quot;I see at least 2 issues with the physical punishment: - it will only make the bullies taking their revenge on vulnerable ones with even more cruelty. And they will plan it carefully to be hard/impossible to prove. It will lead to the escalation, not to the resolution - the power will be abused, it&amp;#39;s inevitable. I would be so scared to be in a class where &amp;#39;teacher&amp;#39; has the power to harm me physically! (to clarify: I am very much out of the school age, but just thinking about this perspective is…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt; and those who argue that boys and girls are fundamentally different and require distinct disciplinary approaches &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48059986&quot; title=&quot;This sounds crazy, I know, but perhaps boys and girls are different.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics contend that state-sanctioned violence will only teach children that force is an acceptable way to resolve issues, potentially leading to more calculated and cruel retaliation from bullies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48044883&quot; title=&quot;I see at least 2 issues with the physical punishment: - it will only make the bullies taking their revenge on vulnerable ones with even more cruelty. And they will plan it carefully to be hard/impossible to prove. It will lead to the escalation, not to the resolution - the power will be abused, it&amp;#39;s inevitable. I would be so scared to be in a class where &amp;#39;teacher&amp;#39; has the power to harm me physically! (to clarify: I am very much out of the school age, but just thinking about this perspective is…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Alternatively, some suggest that the most effective deterrents are highly personalized consequences, such as removing a student from a sports team &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48058687&quot; title=&quot;The only effective punishment/threat that I saw work on my bullies at school was the threat to remove one of them from the football team and prevent him from playing for the school. He turned it around and was ok after that. It was highly effective because it was a bigger punishment than those used for not doing your homework, and because it was highly relevant to him specifically. It worked because we had 16 students to a class (I was very privileged to be there) and teachers who gave a crap…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; or taking away specific privileges they value &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48059003&quot; title=&quot;The generalized version of this is &amp;#39;take away something they care about&amp;#39;.  But it&amp;#39;s not always easy to do.  In many cases, schools have nothing the kids care about.  If they do, rules often prohibit them from using it as leverage.  And in many cases parents also are unwilling to apply any kind of consequence that would make their kid unhappy.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. However, educators face significant challenges in implementing these alternatives, as many schools lack the resources for individualized attention &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48058687&quot; title=&quot;The only effective punishment/threat that I saw work on my bullies at school was the threat to remove one of them from the football team and prevent him from playing for the school. He turned it around and was ok after that. It was highly effective because it was a bigger punishment than those used for not doing your homework, and because it was highly relevant to him specifically. It worked because we had 16 students to a class (I was very privileged to be there) and teachers who gave a crap…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; or struggle with the societal consequences of expelling &amp;#34;dysfunctional&amp;#34; students who then lack a path to rehabilitation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48060058&quot; title=&quot;Expel the kid I want everyone to succeed as much as possible, I feel bad for such kids. But at that point, the kid won’t learn, won’t launch, there’s no benefit to keeping them in school and massive consequences for the good kids.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48060103&quot; title=&quot;Two problems: 1) school education is mandatory until 16-18 in most countries, so what do you do with them once they get expelled. They have to be in education somewhere - so do you just put them in one school for all the expelled students, which is just constantly on fire? You made the problem much worse for yourself(as in - the state). 2) &amp;#39; there’s no benefit to keeping them in school and massive consequences for the good kids&amp;#39; - the massive consequences for kicking them out and not dealing…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/news/higher-limits-spacex&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (anthropic.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48037986&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;509 points · 482 comments · by meetpateltech&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic has partnered with SpaceX to utilize its Colossus 1 data center capacity, enabling the company to immediately double Claude Code rate limits and significantly increase API limits for Claude Opus models. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/news/higher-limits-spacex&quot; title=&quot;Title: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX    URL Source: https://www.anthropic.com/news/higher-limits-spacex    Markdown Content:  We’ve agreed to a partnership with SpaceX that will substantially increase our compute capacity. This, along with our other recent compute deals, means that we’ve been able to increase our usage limits for Claude Code and the Claude API.    Below, we describe these changes and the progress we’re making on compute.    The following three changes—all…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The announcement of Anthropic utilizing Elon Musk’s data centers and exploring orbital compute has sparked debate over whether the space-based initiative is a serious strategic move or a marketing &amp;#34;plot twist&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038561&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; As part of this agreement, we have also expressed interest in partnering with SpaceX to develop multiple gigawatts of orbital AI compute capacity. Anthropic is either taking this space business more serious than the general public, or posting this sentence was part of the deal to get the compute.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038416&quot; title=&quot;Anthropic renting out the data center Elon built for Grok is the kind of plot twist you can&amp;#39;t make up.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users question the economic viability of orbital data centers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038933&quot; title=&quot;Anthropic needs any compute they can get. So if Elon wants to build orbital data centers Anthropic would be happy to run models on it. There isn&amp;#39;t really any doubt Elon can build orbital data centers the question is if they are economical compared to earth based.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48039672&quot; title=&quot;What are you talking about There is no doubt that it&amp;#39;s not a serious idea.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, critics argue the idea is physically impractical due to the extreme difficulty of dissipating heat in a vacuum &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040807&quot; title=&quot;As I understand it, the problem is cooling. There isn&amp;#39;t any medium to take away the heat, so the only option is to slowly radiate it away.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040935&quot; title=&quot;Anyone who has googled just once to ask if datacenters in space make any sense, has found out they don&amp;#39;t because they can&amp;#39;t get rid of heat. That leaves only two kinds of people left who are still talking excitedly about datacenters in space: The uninformed and the grifters.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Meanwhile, others view the deal as a savvy move for SpaceX to monetize assets originally built for Grok &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038702&quot; title=&quot;Pretty smart for SpaceX though. They’re turning an asset they made for a money-pit (Grok) into probably a major source of revenue ahead of their IPO.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, though some users remain skeptical of Anthropic&amp;#39;s increased usage limits, labeling them a &amp;#34;marketing stunt&amp;#34; if weekly caps remain unchanged &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038723&quot; title=&quot;Doubling the five-hour rate limits is merely a marketing stunt if the weekly rates are not also doubled. It simply means that you can reach the weekly limits in three days instead of five.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://red-squares.cian.lol/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Red Squares – GitHub outages as contributions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (red-squares.cian.lol)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48034587&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;767 points · 167 comments · by cianmm&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Red Squares is a satirical heatmap that tracks GitHub&amp;#39;s reliability by visualizing service outages as contribution squares, reporting 32.5 days of downtime across 167 incidents over the past year. &lt;a href=&quot;https://red-squares.cian.lol/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Red Squares — the GitHub outage graph    URL Source: https://red-squares.cian.lol/    Published Time: Wed, 06 May 2026 16:37:44 GMT    Warning: This is a cached snapshot of the original page, consider retry with caching opt-out.    Markdown Content:  The contribution graph nobody asked for. Each red square is a day GitHub broke; the darker the square, the longer it stayed broken.    32.5 days of GitHub downtime in the last year    Across 167 days with at least one incident · worst day Thu, Apr 30,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The recent frequency of GitHub outages has sparked debate over whether the instability stems from massive load increases driven by AI agents &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48035080&quot; title=&quot;Agents are shipping code faster all over the world and in some cases 24 hours a day. Additionally, some significant number of non-developers are now developers i.e. they are also shipping to github regularly. This is not limited to just pushing code but all the bells and whistles that github added as features under the assumption of some predictable growth are now exceeding the original plans. I suspect a lot of their existing systems have to be re-architected for unanticipated scale, and it…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48035743&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Disruption with Gemini 2.5 Pro model &amp;gt; Disruption with Grok Code Fast 1 in Copilot &amp;gt; Incident with Copilot Grok Code Fast 1 &amp;gt; Claude Opus 4 is experiencing degraded performance It doesn&amp;#39;t seem fair to blame Github for this? There&amp;#39;s nothing they can do about it?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt; or systemic management failures and a &amp;#34;shit&amp;#34; tech stack &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48035619&quot; title=&quot;Every time one of these vibe coded meme sites gets posted there’re endless comments about how it’s not actually because of load, the GitHub team is shit, their tech stack is shit, Microsoft is shit, Azure is shit, etc. Just compare the GitHub status page for public GitHub vs the enterprise cloud pages. Enterprise has much better numbers and I’ve personally can’t remember the last time there was an outage that prevented me from doing work. If the problems didn’t revolve around load, I’d expect…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48035805&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; the GitHub team is shit, their tech stack is shit 1) Criticism of being unable to achieve service is not a fault of the individual; it simply is a fault of the system. You can criticise the system, it&amp;#39;s permissible. Especially if they have more resources than many countries and some of the best tech talent in the world on staff. 2) Their tech stack is shit, and they&amp;#39;ve gone on record for years defending it, quite arrogantly in some cases, as if nobody can possibly know anything unless they&amp;#39;ve…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that the public site&amp;#39;s issues are load-related because the enterprise offering remains stable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48035619&quot; title=&quot;Every time one of these vibe coded meme sites gets posted there’re endless comments about how it’s not actually because of load, the GitHub team is shit, their tech stack is shit, Microsoft is shit, Azure is shit, etc. Just compare the GitHub status page for public GitHub vs the enterprise cloud pages. Enterprise has much better numbers and I’ve personally can’t remember the last time there was an outage that prevented me from doing work. If the problems didn’t revolve around load, I’d expect…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that GitHub has suffered from poor uptime for years due to an arrogant culture and a forced migration to Azure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48035805&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; the GitHub team is shit, their tech stack is shit 1) Criticism of being unable to achieve service is not a fault of the individual; it simply is a fault of the system. You can criticise the system, it&amp;#39;s permissible. Especially if they have more resources than many countries and some of the best tech talent in the world on staff. 2) Their tech stack is shit, and they&amp;#39;ve gone on record for years defending it, quite arrogantly in some cases, as if nobody can possibly know anything unless they&amp;#39;ve…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48036470&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;not intellectually curious or open This checks out.  I once was at a conference where they (Azure) had a giant booth.  A fairly well known person in the community brings me over to talk to his manager who is working the booth.  &amp;#39;We should hire him, he&amp;#39;s really smart.&amp;#39;  Within a minute of talking to this manager he says &amp;#39;You&amp;#39;re a Linux guy?  We do Windows.&amp;#39; and physically turns away from me, conversation over.  You know, fair enough, was an easy way to find that it wasn&amp;#39;t a good fit.  But the…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48035113&quot; title=&quot;They were sucking 5 years ago before agents existed. I don’t think this has anything to do with recent changes. https://damrnelson.github.io/github-historical-uptime/&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable anecdotes include a &amp;#34;stunning&amp;#34; lack of curiosity from Azure management regarding Linux expertise &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48036470&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;not intellectually curious or open This checks out.  I once was at a conference where they (Azure) had a giant booth.  A fairly well known person in the community brings me over to talk to his manager who is working the booth.  &amp;#39;We should hire him, he&amp;#39;s really smart.&amp;#39;  Within a minute of talking to this manager he says &amp;#39;You&amp;#39;re a Linux guy?  We do Windows.&amp;#39; and physically turns away from me, conversation over.  You know, fair enough, was an easy way to find that it wasn&amp;#39;t a good fit.  But the…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt; and observations that GitHub&amp;#39;s historical uptime was problematic long before the rise of AI-driven development &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48035113&quot; title=&quot;They were sucking 5 years ago before agents existed. I don’t think this has anything to do with recent changes. https://damrnelson.github.io/github-historical-uptime/&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sqlite.org/locrsf.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SQLite Is a Library of Congress Recommended Storage Format&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sqlite.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48042434&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;658 points · 192 comments · by whatisabcdefgh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The U.S. Library of Congress has designated SQLite as a recommended storage format for datasets, selecting it alongside XML, JSON, and CSV for its high potential for long-term survival and accessibility. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sqlite.org/locrsf.html&quot; title=&quot;Title:     URL Source: https://sqlite.org/locrsf.html    Published Time: Thu, 07 May 2026 07:56:11 GMT    Markdown Content:  # LoC Recommended Storage Format    [![Image 1: SQLite](https://sqlite.org/images/sqlite370_banner.svg)](https://sqlite.org/index.html)     Small. Fast. Reliable.    Choose any three.     *   [Home](https://sqlite.org/index.html)  *   [Menu](javascript:void(0))  *   [About](https://sqlite.org/about.html)  *   [Documentation](https://sqlite.org/docs.html)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SQLite is highly regarded for its reliability and ACID compliance, often serving as a robust alternative to ad-hoc file management or unstable filesystems like exFAT &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48045505&quot; title=&quot;On a recent project I have needed to use exFAT.  exFAT is terrible for a number of reasons, but in my case the thing I had to deal with was the lack of journaling, which had the possibility to corrupt files if there were a power interruption or something. I initially was writing a series of files and doing some quasi-append-only things with new files and compacting the old one to sort of reinvent journaling.  What I did more or less worked but it was very ad hoc and bad and was probably hiding…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48045580&quot; title=&quot;I went from thinking “SQLite is a toy product, not reliable for real data&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;lets use SQLite for almost everything&amp;#39; SQLite is very good if you can fit into the single writer, multiple readers pattern; you&amp;#39;ll never lose data if you use the correct settings, which takes a minute of Google search to figure out. Today, most of my apps are simply go binary + SQLite + systemd service file. I&amp;#39;ve yet to lose data. Performance is great and plenty for most apps&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users have reported rare data corruption or dislike its flexible typing, many developers now favor it for its simplicity in &amp;#34;single writer, multiple reader&amp;#34; scenarios &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48045580&quot; title=&quot;I went from thinking “SQLite is a toy product, not reliable for real data&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;lets use SQLite for almost everything&amp;#39; SQLite is very good if you can fit into the single writer, multiple readers pattern; you&amp;#39;ll never lose data if you use the correct settings, which takes a minute of Google search to figure out. Today, most of my apps are simply go binary + SQLite + systemd service file. I&amp;#39;ve yet to lose data. Performance is great and plenty for most apps&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48047913&quot; title=&quot;I used SQLite for a few applications several years ago. One time, the database got corrupted and all the data was lost. That was the day I stopped using SQLite. Also, the lack of enforced column data types was always a negative for me.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. However, its ease of use can lead to corporate bans because it allows sensitive data to be easily moved as a portable file, bypassing traditional DBA oversight—a risk critics argue is equally present in the ubiquitous use of Excel &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48044400&quot; title=&quot;I have always loved SQLite. I have also heard that some firms ban its use. Why? Because it makes it SO easy to set up a database for your app that you end up with a super critical component of your application that looks exactly like a file. A file that can have any extension. And that file can be copied around to other servers. Even if there is PII in that file. Multiply this times the number of applications in your firm and you can see how this could get a little nuts. DevOps and DBA teams…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48044647&quot; title=&quot;The question is, do the same firms ban Excel? Excel spreadsheets often end up as shadow databases in unlikely places.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48044714&quot; title=&quot;The sane thing would be to ban Excel and promote SQLite. Excel is often used for tabulated text (issue tracking) not calculations. Perfect use case for a relational db&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, some developers are exploring even lighter, read-only alternatives for specific use cases like compressed file archives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48046007&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m always inspired by SQLite. Overall I like it, but if you&amp;#39;re not doing writes it&amp;#39;s really overkill. So I made a format that will never surpass SQLite, except that it&amp;#39;s extremely lighter and faster and works on zstd compressed files. It has really small indexes and can contain binaries or text just like SQLite. The wasm part that decompresses and reads and searches the databases is only 38kb (uncompressed (maybe 16kb gzipped)). Compare that to SQLite&amp;#39;s 1.2mb of wasm and glue code it&amp;#39;s 3% the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/introducing-google-cloud-fraud-defense-the-next-evolution-of-recaptcha/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Google Cloud fraud defense, the next evolution of reCAPTCHA&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cloud.google.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48039362&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;405 points · &lt;strong&gt;437 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by unforgivenpasta&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google Cloud has launched Fraud Defense, an evolution of reCAPTCHA designed to verify the legitimacy of humans and AI agents through advanced activity measurement, a granular policy engine, and new AI-resistant QR code challenges. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/introducing-google-cloud-fraud-defense-the-next-evolution-of-recaptcha/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Introducing Google Cloud Fraud Defense, the next evolution of reCAPTCHA    URL Source: https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/introducing-google-cloud-fraud-defense-the-next-evolution-of-recaptcha/    Published Time: 2026-04-22    Markdown Content:  The agentic web — where autonomous AI agents reason, plan, and execute complex transactions using the open web and industry standard protocols — aims to create an autonomous customer experience. While these agents can significantly…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The evolution of reCAPTCHA raises significant concerns regarding the potential exclusion of users without modern smartphones, Google Play Services, or official device integrity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48039980&quot; title=&quot;The requirements for the mobile devices are listed here: https://support.google.com/recaptcha/answer/16609652 So it seems that you will need a modern Android device with Google Play Services installed or a modern iPhone/iPad to be allowed to browse the web in the future. No mention of device integrity verification yet, but the writing is on the wall.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48041905&quot; title=&quot;Serious question: what if you don’t have a (smart)phone?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters fear this shift effectively mandates a form of digital identification for web browsing, further eroding anonymity and centralizing control under a single tech corporation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040131&quot; title=&quot;This is going to make my grapheneos journey a bit more exciting. How wild to force users through an official google identification for web browsing. Does the iPhone recaptcha app force you to login with a Google account? Seems we didn&amp;#39;t need ID verification for the web to lose all anonymity.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48041381&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d rather have to do ID verification at a government site that gives out blindable RSA signatures to browse the web with using open source software, than this overseas tech company needing to lock down the whole device and tech stack and not have to &amp;#39;show ID&amp;#39; at all. One of these two holds elections... Music/movie corporations and game developers must look forward to an age where people can&amp;#39;t access the cache files or hook up a debugger to their apps anymore&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48042667&quot; title=&quot;I’m already sick and tired of seeing cloudflares “making sure you aren’t a bot” checkbox everywhere. Sometimes it locks me out entirely and decides I don’t get to view pages. I see recaptcha less frequently but it’s much more annoying, with all the clicking of crosswalks, or busses, or whatever. I am not looking forward to a web where google can not only lock me out of my email, but also large sections of the previously public internet. Occasionally google decides I don’t get to do searches,…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that the vast majority of users will passively accept these hurdles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040126&quot; title=&quot;99.999% of people don&amp;#39;t give a shit and don&amp;#39;t even know what this means. They&amp;#39;ll follow the instructions. These are the same 99.999% of people who press win+R ctrl+V enter when the captcha prompts them to. Because do this to see the dancing bunnies.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48042066&quot; title=&quot;That means you&amp;#39;re a peasant, and don&amp;#39;t matter.  Don&amp;#39;t worry, they&amp;#39;ll work with telecoms and carriers to ensure devices matching your budget are subsidized and made available at every possible opportunity.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others express a firm refusal to engage with technologies like QR-code-based purchasing or restrictive verification systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48041019&quot; title=&quot;Any company that requires me to scan a QR code to make a purchase is losing my purchase.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040039&quot; title=&quot;... or you&amp;#39;ll need to stop using reCAPTCHA if you want to get any traffic on your Web site. I know, people will slavishly knuckle under, but let me dream for a few minutes.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://katedaviesdesigns.com/2026/04/29/knitting-bullshit/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Knitting bullshit&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (katedaviesdesigns.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48032461&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;484 points · 206 comments · by ColinEberhardt&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kate Davies criticizes the rise of &amp;#34;knitting bullshit,&amp;#34; specifically AI-generated podcasts and videos that prioritize emotional validation over factual history and technical accuracy. She argues that this &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; devalues the craft&amp;#39;s human legacy and urges enthusiasts to support real creators instead of synthetic, profit-driven content. &lt;a href=&quot;https://katedaviesdesigns.com/2026/04/29/knitting-bullshit/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Unraveling AI&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;Knitting Bullshit&amp;#39;    URL Source: https://katedaviesdesigns.com/2026/04/29/knitting-bullshit/    Published Time: 2026-04-29T13:59:31+00:00    Markdown Content:  # Unraveling AI&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;Knitting Bullshit&amp;#39;    *   [About KDD](https://katedaviesdesigns.com/about-kdd/)  *   [blog home](https://katedaviesdesigns.com/blog-home/)  *   [shop](https://www.shopkdd.com/)  *   [quick links](https://katedaviesdesigns.com/quick-links/)  *   [subscribe](https://katedaviesdesigns.com/subscribe/)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of AI-generated &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; in niche hobbies like knitting has sparked a deep sense of loss among users who feel it &amp;#34;hollows out&amp;#34; the messy joys of human experience &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48035955&quot; title=&quot;Increasingly, my reaction to AI-generated content of basically all types is simply a deep, resonant sadness. The growth of AI feels a little like losing a limb - there is an initial shock of sadness, an initial dose of loss, an initial sense of what has been taken away. But then for months and years afterwards, the daily occurrence of some other little humdrum experience, and only at the moment of the encounter does one think, &amp;#39;Ah yes, this too is forever changed.&amp;#39; Like sounding the depths of a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48034241&quot; title=&quot;I wonder if (or, more accurately hope that) this kind of slop will eventually die out as people realise how little care is put into it. I am more and more convinced that if the devil existed he&amp;#39;d take care of the bigger stuff, but have an army of little devils that encourage people to do things like make unsupervised automated podcasts about knitting, relentlessly chipping away at the messy joys of living.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48034591&quot; title=&quot;The idea that we could create a world where &amp;#39;a big part of the future of hobbies and entertainment&amp;#39; is people listening to meaningless words made up by machines that help them feel good about themselves sounds horrifying. How could anybody feel ok about that? What would it say about the society we&amp;#39;ve built?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this shift is an inevitable societal evolution toward efficiency and validation over technical process &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48034526&quot; title=&quot;I like the blog but the premise of the blog is an engineering/epistemological perspective on the craft. The writer clearly cares more about the process, technique and history more than the feeling and validation. It could be, that a big part of the the future of hobby&amp;#39;s and entertainment in this way is the feeling and validation over the actual performance. Or it can be that a massive amount of people find their value in this content.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48034672&quot; title=&quot;It would say that society changes, and people who were not used to a new world get upset about it, as it has always been throughout the entire history of humanity. We were used to having psychologists and doctors in person, now the most common form is to have it through apps, and the younger generation does not care, it&amp;#39;s in fact more efficient to get a prescription that you like than to spend time going places and having in-person meetings. But older generation finds it hollowing out and…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others question the legitimacy of the traffic, suggesting these automated podcasts may be driven by ad fraud, money laundering, or influence testing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48034154&quot; title=&quot;Am I to believe that those 700K+ downloads are organic traffic? Who&amp;#39;s listening to all this stuff?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48036037&quot; title=&quot;The economist in me immediately asks: Where is the financial incentive to do this? Just the same way the programmer would ask what the stack is. Some possibilities: 1) Money laundering - large content farm someone can argue makes xyz in revenue to hide an alternate source of revenue. 2) Ad fraud - leading up podcast charts or SEO results to attract clicks to sell ads. Bot farms could also be making clicks to pretend sell ads as well. 3) Attempt to dominate the niche for sale of knitting…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the influx of low-effort content, some find it reinforces the value of human intentionality and the &amp;#34;classic&amp;#34; artistry that AI cannot yet replicate &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48036409&quot; title=&quot;To me it had, in a way, the opposite effect - I started appreciating non-AI content more. Good art has something that is difficult to reproduce if one isn&amp;#39;t already an artist who is just using AI as a medium - it&amp;#39;s intentionality. Take for example Floor796[0]. Every little detail counts and while you could use AI to generate single characters or even the whole thing, you&amp;#39;d inevitably find details which have no reason to be there. You could then remove them manually or modify your prompt or…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://electrek.co/2026/05/05/byd-overtakes-tesla-kia-best-selling-ev-brand-key-overseas-markets/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;BYD overtakes Tesla and Kia as the best-selling EV brand in key overseas markets&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (electrek.co)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48039739&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;234 points · &lt;strong&gt;385 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by doener&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BYD has overtaken Tesla and Kia to become the top-selling electric vehicle brand in several key overseas markets, including the UK, Australia, and Brazil, as of early 2026. &lt;a href=&quot;https://electrek.co/2026/05/05/byd-overtakes-tesla-kia-best-selling-ev-brand-key-overseas-markets/&quot; title=&quot;BYD outsells Tesla and Kia as the best-selling EV brand in several key overseas markets    With over 7% market share, BYD is now the top-selling EV brand in the UK so far in 2026, surpassing...    [Skip to main content](#main)    Toggle main menu    [Electrek Logo Go to the Electrek home page](https://electrek.co/)     Switch site    * [9to5Mac Logo9to5Mac](https://9to5mac.com/)  * [9to5Google Logo9to5Google](https://9to5google.com/)  * [9to5Toys](https://9to5toys.com/)  * [Drone DJ…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on whether BYD’s success signals a &amp;#34;US decline&amp;#34; fueled by protectionist policies that prevent domestic consumers from accessing superior, affordable EV technology &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040027&quot; title=&quot;BYD has to me become an icon of US decline vs Chinese expansion. It’s just one example among many of China charting the way forward and innovating while the US recedes further into backward-looking, protectionist policy. See: US politicians on both sides trying to ban BYD imports rather than incentivizing stiffer competition from US automakers. Another example: massive growth in Chinese renewables while the US opens up national parks for drilling and cancels solar/wind projects. You…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040073&quot; title=&quot;Would be great if we could buy/drive these in the US. Funny how we have a &amp;#39;free market&amp;#39; only when it is convenient for certain interests...&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040100&quot; title=&quot;The world before all of the big beautiful tariffs. It&amp;#39;s depressing that we can&amp;#39;t buy BYD in the USA. It&amp;#39;s feeling more and more like being stuck with a Lada in the 1980s.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some admire China’s rapid infrastructure and renewable energy expansion &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040027&quot; title=&quot;BYD has to me become an icon of US decline vs Chinese expansion. It’s just one example among many of China charting the way forward and innovating while the US recedes further into backward-looking, protectionist policy. See: US politicians on both sides trying to ban BYD imports rather than incentivizing stiffer competition from US automakers. Another example: massive growth in Chinese renewables while the US opens up national parks for drilling and cancels solar/wind projects. You…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040192&quot; title=&quot;I was glued to the window while flying over southern China recently. There is so much infrastructure you can see from the air, even in fairly rural provinces. So many bridges. So many wind turbines. It is visibly a country on the move, a country that believes in itself and its ability to do things. The Chinese Century is increasingly palpable, for better or worse.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that China is equally protectionist and that its growth masks severe underlying issues like youth unemployment and a demographic crisis &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040043&quot; title=&quot;In what world is China less &amp;#39;protectionist&amp;#39; than the US?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040385&quot; title=&quot;I have two chinese-born coworkers (who spent 20-30 years here in the us) in the same room. When we talk about china&amp;#39;s expansion, I am always jealous of the public projects, infrastructure, housing, etc. They always point out the huge unemployment of young people, declining birth rate, and other social ills. They say they&amp;#39;re worried when the building stops. Even more people will be out of jobs. And when the nation ages all they built will be used and maintained by fewer people I&amp;#39;ve never been to…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040177&quot; title=&quot;BYD has pretty amazing tech to be honest, but putting protectionism as an argument against the US and pro BYD in the same sentence is naive at best. The CCP allowed BYD to exist and the CCP can end BYD in a single weekend regardless of any human right concerns elsewhere.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040111&quot; title=&quot;I agree that that would be great as a consumer, but given how protectionist China is, you can hardly blame countries for responding in kind. Trade should be a two way street.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, critics point out that despite China&amp;#39;s green energy lead, the country remains heavily dependent on coal for power generation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040255&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Another example: massive growth in Chinese renewables while the US opens up national parks for drilling and cancels solar/wind projects. You occasionally see a heartwarming post: “California adds solar panels over a canal” and it just looks cute and kind of sad compared to the massive, ambitious, and technologically superior build out of Chinese renewables. Coal is still the majority of generation capacity [1] in China and China continues to build a lot more coal [2] [1]:…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;http://halupedia.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Hallucinopedia&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (halupedia.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038257&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;304 points · 267 comments · by bstrama&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Halupedia is an AI-powered encyclopedia that generates and permanently stores scholarly articles on demand for obscure, niche, or fictional topics. The platform treats all subjects with encyclopedic seriousness, documenting everything from historical anomalies to scientific curiosities upon a user&amp;#39;s first request. &lt;a href=&quot;http://halupedia.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Halupedia — Halupedia    URL Source: http://halupedia.com/    Markdown Content:  # Halupedia — Halupedia    [Halu·pedia](http://halupedia.com/)[Buy us tokens →](https://buymeacoffee.com/baderbc &amp;#39;Donations go directly to LLM tokens so the press can keep printing.&amp;#39;)    [Index](http://halupedia.com/)[All entries](http://halupedia.com/all-entries)[Stumble](http://halupedia.com/#stumble)[GitHub](https://github.com/BaderBC/halupedia)[Discord](https://discord.gg/fKMnyNwtGc)Search  #…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users celebrate the project as a creative, Borges-style parody &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48039535&quot; title=&quot;This is fantastic. I couldn&amp;#39;t find any obvious way to search for a new page, but you can simply bang out any arbitrary URL slug and the new article will be hallucinated fresh, eg: https://halupedia.com/shortest-cave-in-the-world https://halupedia.com/echolocation-ability-in-spiders&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48039282&quot; title=&quot;Love it! It feels very Borges! Feature request: also be able to click on the Talk page to see the controversies. I don&amp;#39;t always want to trust the article itself as the final word. Edit: Oh look, there&amp;#39;s an article about the YC! https://halupedia.com/y-combinator&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, the discussion is heavily focused on the site&amp;#39;s rapid descent into &amp;#34;defacement&amp;#34; via hateful and antisemitic content &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48043882&quot; title=&quot;It’s been defaced. It’s already got sex crimes and antisemitism all over the place.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48045800&quot; title=&quot;This is really cool, I just wish people wouldn&amp;#39;t deface the website by submitting hateful speech as titles.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue the lack of moderation makes it unsuitable for educational use &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48046106&quot; title=&quot;The &amp;#39;all articles&amp;#39; section really is a dive into what happens when you allow unfiltered posting - it&amp;#39;s a shame that it isn&amp;#39;t clear how many individuals are creating this hateful and otherwise inappropriate titles - is it just 1 or 2 people, or has this been posted to 4chan or somewhere and there is a concerted effort to disrupt the site? Shame there isn&amp;#39;t a way to flag pages for removal. I was going to point my kids at this site, and it could be a great learning tool for schools, but not…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt; and potentially harmful to the web&amp;#39;s information integrity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038896&quot; title=&quot;Funny, but you could argue this is actively harmful to the web.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, while others defend it as obvious satire akin to *The Onion* &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48042212&quot; title=&quot;I wouldn&amp;#39;t. And, I&amp;#39;d think less of anyone who does make that argument. Anyone of reasonable intelligence can easily tell this is a parody of an encyclopedia. Saying this is bad for the web is like saying The Onion is bad for the web.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a cynical consensus that such &amp;#34;hallucinated&amp;#34; data will inevitably pollute future AI training sets and search engine overviews &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038643&quot; title=&quot;Give it a week and see what Google AI Overview has to say about the Great Pigeon Census of 1887!&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038787&quot; title=&quot;Can&amp;#39;t wait to see the next generation of LLMs after feeding it all of that hahaha&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.wiisfi.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Wi is Fi: Understanding Wi-Fi 4/5/6/6E/7/8 (802.11 n/AC/ax/be/bn)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (wiisfi.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48037760&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;400 points · 102 comments · by homebrewer&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This comprehensive guide explains that Wi-Fi performance is primarily limited by client device capabilities and physical distance rather than router marketing specs. It details how real-world throughput typically reaches only 70% of the &amp;#34;PHY&amp;#34; link speed due to protocol overhead, interference, and hardware constraints like MIMO levels. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.wiisfi.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Understanding Wi-Fi 4/5/6/6E/7/8 (802.11 n/ac/ax/be/bn)    URL Source: https://www.wiisfi.com/    Published Time: Fri, 01 May 2026 17:37:57 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Understanding Wi-Fi 4/5/6/6E/7/8 (802.11 n/ac/ax/be/bn)    [](https://www.wiisfi.com/)  **Wi** is **Fi**  Understanding Wi-Fi 4/5/6/6E/7/8 (802.11 n/ac/ax/be/bn) _Make your own educated Wi-Fi upgrade decisions_ Version 11.5p (updated May 1, 2026) Chapters 0 0.[Introduction](https://www.wiisfi.com/#introduction) 0 1.[Executive…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The core limitation of Wi-Fi is its nature as a shared medium where only one transmitter can typically use a channel at a time, though users debate the extent to which neighboring networks act as manageable noise versus total blockers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070317&quot; title=&quot;An impressive attempt to summarise Wi-Fi which is a very deep topic. However I think the executive summary already missed the most critical thing about Wi-Fi: only 1 transmitter at a time per channel - across all WLANs, yours and your neighbours, with no deterministic way to avoid collisions. It&amp;#39;s a shared medium and it&amp;#39;s not even half duplex, unlike the dedicated full duplex you would typically get with an ethernet cable to a switch port. The fact that Wi-Fi achieves what it does with this…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48071014&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; only 1 transmitter at a time per channel - across all WLANs, yours and your neighbours, with no deterministic way to avoid collisions. That’s not correct. You and your neighbor can use the same channel at the same time. On your network, the transmissions of the other network appear will appear as noise. As long as the other devices are far enough away, however, your devices will still be able to make out their own signal.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While standards now iterate rapidly, real-world performance is often bottlenecked by client-side behavior—such as devices &amp;#34;sticking&amp;#34; to distant access points—and the fact that peak speeds require signal-to-noise ratios rarely maintained in practice &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070123&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d like to understand why the WiFi spec developed so slowly from G to N and finally to AC but now it&amp;#39;s seems like a new version is released every other year yet many of the features/extensions are poorly implemented or have nearly 0 real world improvement.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070866&quot; title=&quot;One thing that wasn&amp;#39;t mentioned is that the more APs you have, the worst off your life gets. That&amp;#39;s because the way clients connect to a particular AP is done client-side and you have no control over it or visibility. So, no matter how you fiddle with it, your client may connect to the AP that is 40 feet away and on another floor rather than the one that is 10 feet away with a perfect line of sight. And you won&amp;#39;t know why. This is the problem I had with my house and had to decrease the number…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070687&quot; title=&quot;So that table is using distance as a proxy for signal to noise ratio. SNR is what really matters. Each data rate in the standard uses a different encoding technique. &amp;#39;Faster&amp;#39; encoding techniques cram more data into a given transmission interval but require a higher signal to noise ratio to be received without error. Since SNR declines with distance you can have a rough idea at what distance from a transmitter you will be able to receive at what data rate. However, people and vendors focus far…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Consequently, many power users still favor wired backhauls or fiber to avoid the inherent instability and diminishing returns of high-frequency wireless signals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48069956&quot; title=&quot;Nice detailed article! Finding it increasingly difficult to avoid bottlenecks though. Even with wifi 7 I still get 1.3 on my mac and 0.5 on iphone. More than enough realistically, but upstream internet is 1.7 so tiny bit unfortunately Think I&amp;#39;m just going to wire the place with 10 gig fiber &amp;gt;The speed advantages that Access Points have over mesh systems will become much more obvious with Wi-Fi 7. From what I&amp;#39;ve read mesh devices generally can detect when they&amp;#39;ve got wired backhaul so they can…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070130&quot; title=&quot;Due to boring circumstances outside of my control, I have to use WiFi for the most part, so I&amp;#39;ve got quite some experience with making it run optimally (or rather, as optimally as I managed to, not as optimally as I would like it to). And yeah, you pretty much already have to have a visible line of sight to get anything even close to 1 Gbps. And still be on channels with little interference. (DFS helps if you&amp;#39;re not near radar, which intentionally causes you to get kicked off those channels and…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.stripes.com/opinion/2026-04-23/stripes-former-ombudsman-pentagon-trying-to-silence-21465037.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ombudsman column: The Pentagon is trying to silence me&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (stripes.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48031769&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;352 points · 120 comments · by petethomas&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stars and Stripes ombudsman Jacqueline Smith reports she was fired by the Pentagon after speaking out against new Department of Defense policies that she claims threaten the newspaper’s editorial independence and violate congressional mandates against censorship. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.stripes.com/opinion/2026-04-23/stripes-former-ombudsman-pentagon-trying-to-silence-21465037.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Ombudsman column: The Pentagon is trying to silence me    URL Source: https://www.stripes.com/opinion/2026-04-23/stripes-former-ombudsman-pentagon-trying-to-silence-21465037.html    Published Time: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 09:57:54 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Ombudsman column: The Pentagon is trying to silence me | Stars and Stripes  ![Image 2](https://insight.adsrvr.org/track/pxl/?adv=evd7s0c&amp;amp;ct=0:rg3maz7&amp;amp;fmt=3)![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Pentagon&amp;#39;s attempt to silence its ombudsman has sparked a debate over the erosion of American institutional independence and the recurring nature of executive overreach, with some drawing parallels to the Iran-Contra affair &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48032215&quot; title=&quot;This is deeply disturbing. The terrible, incoherent messaging and strategy around the Iran war (unapproved by Congress) is connected. This is an administration that is seeking less freedom, not more. What entity would sue on behalf of the ombudsman?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48033746&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The House and Senate Armed Services committees have long had an interest in ensuring that unfiltered news went to the troops who are fighting for our country and deserved to read the truth, not propaganda. In the late 1980s Congress was alarmed at attempts of military personnel to “suppress unfavorable news” of the Iran-Contra affair and other issues. Congress mandated that Stars and Stripes be editorially independent and created the position of ombudsman in 1991 to monitor the situation and…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue this reflects a decline in American free speech relative to Europe &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48033256&quot; title=&quot;Favouriting this for the next time someone on here tells me we don&amp;#39;t have free speech in Europe, only in the US&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48033737&quot; title=&quot;People who say there is no free speech in Europe have never lived in an authoritarian country.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others maintain that the lack of criminal prosecution means the U.S. remains more protective of speech than European nations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48033461&quot; title=&quot;Why? The police aren&amp;#39;t at his door and he&amp;#39;s not been arrested it&amp;#39;s not a good thing but we are still miles away from Europe.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant portion of the discussion focuses on congressional accountability, suggesting that if Congress fails to use its constitutional powers to check the President&amp;#39;s military or economic actions, it constitutes tacit approval by the legislative branch &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48032301&quot; title=&quot;It cannot be &amp;#39;unapproved by Congress&amp;#39;. A US president does not have authority to start a war, Congress has, according to Constitution. The president only serves as a Commander in Chief. So at any point Congress can stop any military action issuing an immediate ruling preventing the president doing anything. If our congressmen don&amp;#39;t do that it means they approve it. It&amp;#39;s our, USA, war, not Trump&amp;#39;s war. Because we elected the congressmen.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48032341&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If our congressmen don&amp;#39;t do that it means they approve it. These needs to be repeated everywhere until people understand it. Same situation with tariffs.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48034366&quot; title=&quot;One would expect that system would learn and change, and we wouldn&amp;#39;t have trump fucking up half of global economy so beautifully on his morning whims just to get rich as a side business of being potus (or reverse, probably). Something tells me that after this dark period is over, there won&amp;#39;t be many lessons learned and things changed for the better in the system. &amp;#39;Great system&amp;#39; not being so great after all (which it isn&amp;#39;t, there are much better and more democractic systems implemented all…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://inkscape.org/doc/release_notes/1.4.4/Inkscape_1.4.4.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Inkscape 1.4.4&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (inkscape.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040622&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;354 points · 107 comments · by s1291&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://inkscape.org/doc/release_notes/1.4.4/Inkscape_1.4.4.html&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are divided over Inkscape 1.4.4, with some praising its utility for budget-strapped projects and specialized plugins like Inkstitch &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48044149&quot; title=&quot;Inkscape is really good for products with no budget for designers. Let me explain why. One of the apps I am working on hit 10,000+ active users (per Playstore dashboard), and Inkscape has a role to play in this. Since the app is free and doesn&amp;#39;t even have a backend, there is no budget for the designer. I looked for a few tools online, but most of them failed to generate icons/logos. I ended up using Inkscape to make logos for my app. Without Inkscape, this workflow is difficult. Though I am not…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48041665&quot; title=&quot;Some of the plugins for it are pretty interesting.  We have a Brother embroidery machine in our work Makerspace, and it ends up there&amp;#39;s an Inkscape plugin (called Inkstitch) to create command files for the machine.  It&amp;#39;s like working with a slicer for 3d printing, but more about changing thread than filament, plus how stitches should be oriented and such.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, while others criticize a perceived decline in UX and long-standing regressions in tools like the calligraphy pen &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48041892&quot; title=&quot;Calligraphy pen/tool is still unusable, messy and less responsive (lower resolution, more angular, etc), much worse than in 0.92, and it&amp;#39;s been this way ever since 1.0. It also now requires windows ink to be on, and they removed devices panel so you can&amp;#39;t even tell if your device is recognized properly. It&amp;#39;s bad with a tablet, but it&amp;#39;s still just as bad and much worse in comparison even with the mouse. It&amp;#39;s kinda disappointing to see this bad of a regression to just linger there for years.…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48041304&quot; title=&quot;I love Inkscape. But their UX is getting worse with each release. I think they need another Blender-style overhaul&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. A heated debate exists regarding the &amp;#34;social contract&amp;#34; of open-source software, with some arguing that developers owe users nothing for free tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48042682&quot; title=&quot;Keep in mind that it&amp;#39;s FREE and OPEN SOURCE software&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48043115&quot; title=&quot;Because the authors don&amp;#39;t owe you anything. You aren&amp;#39;t giving them a single thing. They don&amp;#39;t have to justify a thing. There is no SLA, no contract, nothing. Feedback is fine, but there are so comments being things like &amp;#39;ermahgerd I paid nothing for this thing and a feature wasn&amp;#39;t working What the actual F!&amp;#39;. Go file an issue and fix it yourself buddy.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt; and others countering that honest feedback is essential to prevent the software from falling into obscurity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48042725&quot; title=&quot;Firstly developers and designers of OSS need honest feedback from users as well, not just commercial developers. Secondly, how does being OSS justify significant regressions?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48043365&quot; title=&quot;Users don’t owe the authors anything either. If they want to ignore longstanding complaints, they can toil in obscurity. Heck the only reason this post made the front page of HN is because of lingering goodwill that was built up when the software was actually decent. Now that it’s regressed into uselessness, the goodwill is drying up. I, frankly, don’t have any interest in the software anymore, since it was rendered unusable. I recommend everyone steer clear of it as well.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these frustrations, the community continues to contribute minor quality-of-life improvements, such as customizable default filenames &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48043188&quot; title=&quot;I have my first contribution to Inkscape in this release I think.  It&amp;#39;s quite a minor feature though, so I don&amp;#39;t see it in the changelog.  It allows the user to set their default saved file name.  I was tired of drawing.svg :)&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/06/us/ted-turner-death&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ted Turner has died&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cnn.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48037009&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;257 points · 202 comments · by pseudolus&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ted Turner, the media visionary who founded CNN and revolutionized television news with the first 24-hour network, died Wednesday at the age of 87. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/06/us/ted-turner-death&quot; title=&quot;Title: CNN founder Ted Turner, a pioneer of cable TV news, dies at 87    URL Source: https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/06/us/ted-turner-death    Published Time: 2026-05-06T14:07:20.538Z    Markdown Content:  # Ted Turner, CNN founder who pioneered cable TV news, dies at 87 | CNN    Ad Feedback    ### CNN values your feedback     1. How relevant is this ad to you?      2. Did you encounter any technical issues?     - [x]       Video player was slow to load content - [x]   Video content never loaded - [x]   Ad froze or…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters reflect on Ted Turner’s legacy as a visionary who built a media empire by exploiting licensing loopholes in local TV contracts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038175&quot; title=&quot;I remember around 2000 I read about how Ted Turner started his empire: he bought podunk local TV stations that had loose contracts with media owners that allowed them to broadcast shows as often as they wanted, with no restrictions. In the those days, local TV stations were broadcast just like radio and so the assumption was the contract only concerned the audience the TV station&amp;#39;s antenna could reach. But the contract didn&amp;#39;t specify this. Recognizing the loophole, he bought multiple stations…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt; and revolutionizing news with the creation of CNN &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48037564&quot; title=&quot;I remember CNN bursting onto the scene. It was revolutionary. Although there was never (even today) enough news to fill a 24hr period. Just endless repeats of the same block of news.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion highlights his massive environmental and land footprint, specifically his role in preserving American Bison through his private herds and restaurant chain &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038712&quot; title=&quot;Ted Turner owned the largest American Bison herd (~45k animals), supplying meat for his &amp;#39;Ted&amp;#39;s Montana Grill&amp;#39; restaurants. I don&amp;#39;t know much else about the man, but as a supporter of Bison I can commend that part of his legacy. An impressive vision and execution.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040345&quot; title=&quot;#4 largest private land owner in the US: https://landreport.com/land-report-100#top-100 Wonder what&amp;#39;s going to be done with it now that he&amp;#39;s dead.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some express hope regarding his commitment to the Giving Pledge &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038042&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; In 2010, Turner joined Warren Buffett&amp;#39;s and Bill Gates&amp;#39;s The Giving Pledge, vowing to donate the majority of his fortune to charity upon his death. Does The Giving Pledge still exist? Will this happen?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48041203&quot; title=&quot;Jane Fonda was his last spouse.  I hope he left it to her.  She&amp;#39;s a very cool lady with a great head on her shoulders.  A recent interview (The Interview, NYT) is worth listening to.  She talked very positive about Ted in this interview, which made me think they had a good relationship still.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others remain skeptical, arguing the pledge often serves as PR rather than a guarantee of actual charitable outcomes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038339&quot; title=&quot;The Giving Pledge still exists, but like most philanthropy it has always been more about PR and reputation washing rather than real public good. The majority of people who have died since making the pledge did not meet the terms they agreed to and the vast majority of people still alive who made the pledge are on track to fail to meet the terms as their wealth is growing significantly faster than their charitable donations. This is not to say everyone who has made the Giving Pledge is bad,…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openrss.org/blog/youtube-your-feeds-are-broken&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;YouTube, your RSS feeds are broken&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (openrss.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48030964&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;340 points · 116 comments · by veeti&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Due to technical limitations and excessive request volume, Open RSS reports that YouTube&amp;#39;s RSS feeds are currently experiencing performance issues and accessibility failures. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openrss.org/blog/youtube-your-feeds-are-broken&quot; title=&quot;Title: Whoa    URL Source: https://openrss.org/blog/youtube-your-feeds-are-broken    Warning: Target URL returned error 429: Too Many Requests  Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.    Markdown Content:  # Whoa  Open RSS  Too many requests are being made, which brings down the performance of the service for other users. Please wait a while or [log in](https://openrss.org/login) for full access.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users express frustration that YouTube’s RSS (Atom) feeds are cluttered with &amp;#34;Shorts,&amp;#34; forcing many to manually filter content or use custom scripts to maintain a usable feed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48032067&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Nobody asked for shorts in their feed This has been a big issue for me. I currently use RSS exclusively to view the YouTube channels that I&amp;#39;m subscribed to -- currently about 75 channels (and 27 nebula channels) -- and over half of my YouTube feeds are filled with several shorts (sometimes multiple ones by the same creator per day). Looking for hashtags in the title and marking those videos as read is essentially muscle memory at this point.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48033086&quot; title=&quot;Thanks, I guess I can get rid of my cron task that marks shorts as read in Nextcloud News. How did you find out?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48032645&quot; title=&quot;Out of curiosity, are you filtering out shorts because of YouTube&amp;#39;s terrible Shorts UI, or solely because of shorts&amp;#39; content quality?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. A popular technical workaround involves modifying the feed URL by replacing the `channel_id` with a specific `playlist_id` prefix (`UULF`) to isolate long-form videos &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48032508&quot; title=&quot;I see people are doing scripts or other things to remove shorts from their feeds, but there is a simpler solution. Take your RSS URL of a channel, e.g.: https://www.youtube.com/feeds/videos.xml?channel_id=UCxSGC9B... Replace the `channel_id` with `playlist_id` and replace `UC` with `UULF`. This prefix will only list normal videos: https://www.youtube.com/feeds/videos.xml?playlist_id=UULFxSG...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48033174&quot; title=&quot;I was annoyed one day and was looking online around for some solutions. You can find a bit more information here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71192605/how-do-i-get-yo...&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate the technical distinction between RSS and Atom formats &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48033581&quot; title=&quot;I have a bone to pick with the edited title this was submitted under. The article’s title is “YouTube, your feeds are broken”. The word “RSS” was added to the submission title. That’s factually incorrect: YouTube feeds are Atom, and have been since at least 2009. Even if they have from early days even to this day had a terrible habit of incorrectly labelling the tags with type=&amp;#39;application/rss+xml&amp;#39; and title=&amp;#39;RSS&amp;#39; or similar. (I hate RSS. Awful thing, should have died more than twenty years…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others worry that drawing attention to these feeds might provoke Google to deprecate the feature entirely &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48036767&quot; title=&quot;Please don&amp;#39;t remind Google that they still have RSS feeds, they&amp;#39;ll just kill them entirely.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>