<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Top HN by ALCAZAR</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily</link><description>Daily summaries of the top Hacker News stories.</description><item><title>Top HN · 2026-07-20</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-07-20</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://werd.io/american-ai-is-locked-down-and-proprietary-its-losing/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;China’s open-weights AI strategy is winning&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (werd.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48979269&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1043 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 817 comments · by benwerd&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;China is gaining a global advantage by releasing open-weights AI models, a strategy that fosters innovation and bypasses U.S. export controls while challenging the proprietary, &amp;#34;locked-down&amp;#34; business models of American companies like OpenAI and Anthropic. &lt;a href=&quot;https://werd.io/american-ai-is-locked-down-and-proprietary-its-losing/&quot; title=&quot;Title: American AI is locked down and proprietary. It&amp;#39;s losing.    URL Source: https://werd.io/american-ai-is-locked-down-and-proprietary-its-losing/    Published Time: 2026-07-20T14:15:38.000Z    Markdown Content:  [AI](https://werd.io/tag/ai/)  China&amp;#39;s open-weights AI strategy is winning: its companies are taking the lead. America&amp;#39;s closed-first, locked-down strategy is doomed to failure - and it could take the US economy down with it.    [![Image 1: Ben…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that open-weight models follow a historical trend where &amp;#34;low-end&amp;#34; and free software eventually dismantle expensive, proprietary monopolies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48982784&quot; title=&quot;The lesson of the last 50 years of the computer and software marketplace is that free and low-end eventually wins. - PCs destroyed minicomputers. Mainframes survive, but serving a much tinier portion of the market than they used to. - PC office productivity software destroyed expensive professional products. - Windows (low end) and Linux (free) completely destroyed the UNIX marketplace, and again, have taken huge market share from the mainframe world. Ignoring the huge Chinese open-weight…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some doubt the reported 80% adoption rate of Chinese models among startups &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48979957&quot; title=&quot;I’m suspicious of some quotes here, “80% of startups using Chinese models,” doesn’t seem quite right to me. I just interviewed at several startups and they were all using the US models. Maybe they have some minor use of Chinese models but the bread-and-butter of most of these businesses model use is the Claude and Codex subscriptions.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest China&amp;#39;s strategy effectively undercuts the monetization of U.S. providers by releasing distilled versions of their proprietary data back into the public domain &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48981910&quot; title=&quot;I do think open-weights models are going to &amp;#39;win&amp;#39; in the sense that they&amp;#39;re probably going to be dominant when the hardware to run them becomes affordable. (which might be a while). Although I guess you could probably rent the GPU&amp;#39;s yourself to hypothetically save on costs. (I&amp;#39;m a little skeptical -- I&amp;#39;ve heard of companies doing this and the inference bills are surprisingly high -- assuming the sources are correct. I don&amp;#39;t know if a lot of people  really want to be advertising &amp;#39;oh god our bill…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48982883&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s interesting/funny is that the American LLM companies took from the public domain and copyrighted work to close all that content into a box they charge for. Then the Chinese took the distilled stuff out from that box and released it into the world for everyone.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. However, skepticism remains regarding the long-term sustainability of this model, as current AI development lacks the decentralized improvement mechanisms of traditional open-source software like Linux &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48983106&quot; title=&quot;The problem (right now) is that Open Weight models depend right now on huge companies to spend billion of dollars to train and develop them, all backed up by their incentives and their state to support this, while essentially giving away their monetization path. With open source projects, the benefit was that each individual could improve the complex system (e.g. Linux Kernel) interpedently, and over time the benefits accumulated. With models right now, there is just no way to do distributed…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a notable debate regarding bias, with users pointing out that while Chinese models reflect state perspectives, American models often exhibit their own moralizing &amp;#34;irony&amp;#34; and refusal to answer certain political or copyright-related queries &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48979925&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I have serious concerns about how these models might reflect Chinese government perspectives (try asking them about Tiananmen Square). And I have serious concerns about the American ones. Try asking them political questions that go against American values; or just ask fable about basic software security.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48983155&quot; title=&quot;Try instructing Codex to (say) fine-tune a language model based on a collection of books you&amp;#39;ve got saved. You will find yourself admonished, repeatedly and at length, not to utilize copyrighted materials to train language models, by an AI who owes its entire existence to that very act. These models might be smart but they&amp;#39;re not close to being able to savor irony.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48980018&quot; title=&quot;Q: Why are governments more efficient than private enterprise? Claude: A: &amp;#39;I&amp;#39;d challenge the premise of your question—it&amp;#39;s actually more nuanced than stating governments are inherently more efficient than private enterprise... ... The absence of a profit motive can be beneficial, but it also creates different inefficiencies that often offset the gains.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://xcancel.com/__alpoge__/status/2079028340955197566&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Claude Fable produced a counterexample to the Jacobian Conjecture&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (xcancel.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48973869&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;721 points · 462 comments · by loubbrad&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A user on X reported that an AI named Fable discovered a counterexample to the Jacobian Conjecture, providing a polynomial map with a constant determinant that is not injective. The discovery, verified via WolframAlpha, also suggests the Dixmier and Poisson conjectures may be false. &lt;a href=&quot;https://xcancel.com/__alpoge__/status/2079028340955197566&quot; title=&quot;Title: levent (@__alpoge__)    URL Source: https://xcancel.com/__alpoge__/status/2079028340955197566    Markdown Content:  [XCancel](https://xcancel.com/)[(donate)](https://xcancel.com/about)    [![Image 2: Logo](https://xcancel.com/logo.png)](https://xcancel.com/)    [](https://xcancel.com/search &amp;#39;Search&amp;#39;)    [](https://x.com/__alpoge__/status/2079028340955197566 &amp;#39;Open in X&amp;#39;)    [](https://liberapay.com/yewtube)    [](https://xcancel.com/about…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discovery of a degree 7 counterexample to the Jacobian Conjecture has sparked awe, as previous human efforts focused on much higher degrees and complex brute-forcing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48975195&quot; title=&quot;A little over 10 years ago I remember meeting a postdoc who believed he had something close to a counterexample to the Jacobian Conjecture. He and another person was bruteforcing polynomials in about 16 variables, something like 80 - 700 terms each, using binary trees for mapping coefficients. They were guessing, at the time, that the lower bound of a counterexample (P, Q) for max(deg(P), deg(Q)) would go up to 200. To think that Claude Fable was able to find a counterexample in degree 7 is…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some mathematicians fear AI will soon outpace human exploration and reduce mathematicians to mere &amp;#34;interpreters of the oracle&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48974869&quot; title=&quot;Speaking as a mathematician, it does seem like we&amp;#39;re a bit fucked as a community. Anything that is at all accessible to currently existing methods and mathematical infrastructure is probably going to fall to the frontier models of today, and at this rate of progress it&amp;#39;s likely that, already by next year, we&amp;#39;ll see new infrastructure being put into place by AI, giving us a world in which a few designated interpreters of the oracle get to &amp;#39;do&amp;#39; mathematics, while it withers on the vine as an…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others view these &amp;#34;mopping up&amp;#34; operations as a benefit that prevents humans from wasting years on unsolvable problems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48974311&quot; title=&quot;The great thing about these mathematical mopping up type operations is that no person will waste their time trying to prove it to be true anymore. If anything that’s a win. It would be great if an LLM could settle the Collatz conjecture next, god knows how many man-years have been burned on that by unsuspecting victims.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, skepticism remains high regarding the AI&amp;#39;s actual role, with some users dismissing the claim as a marketing stunt or &amp;#34;AI psychosis&amp;#34; until the full chat history is disclosed and independent verification is complete &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48976123&quot; title=&quot;Unless they share the full LLM chat history, I&amp;#39;m gonna assume that this is a marketing stunt and AI played a very small role in the actual proof, if any. What other reason could they have for not disclosing the LLM chat session?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48976697&quot; title=&quot;They gave their &amp;#39;logic&amp;#39;, such as it is ... and it&amp;#39;s utterly irrational. Note that the &amp;#39;they&amp;#39; who published the counterexample on X is some rando mathematician (Levent Alpöge) working for Anthropic, not Anthropic the organization. He posted the counterexample in a tweet -- reason enough for &amp;#39;not disclosing the LLM chat session&amp;#39;. There&amp;#39;s no reason to think that it won&amp;#39;t provided if asked for, but it hardly seems relevant.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48974366&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d rather wait for independent seasoned mathematicians to verify such claims first before someone at said AI lab posting a claim about solving a proof online. Let this be a lesson to those who fell for such AI psychosis and to not believe everything you see on the internet as real.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.risky.biz/risky-bulletin-hacker-wipes-romanias-entire-land-registry-database/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker wipes Romania&amp;#39;s land registry database&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (news.risky.biz)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978605&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;620 points · 343 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A hacker wiped Romania&amp;#39;s entire land registry database and disabled official real-estate services following a failed extortion attempt against the National Agency for Cadastre and Real Estate Advertising. The agency is currently rebuilding its network from offline backups while law enforcement investigates the suspect, identified as an Algerian national. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.risky.biz/risky-bulletin-hacker-wipes-romanias-entire-land-registry-database/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Hacker wipes Romania&amp;#39;s entire land registry database    URL Source: https://news.risky.biz/risky-bulletin-hacker-wipes-romanias-entire-land-registry-database/    Published Time: 2026-07-20T05:48:05.000Z    Markdown Content:  **_This newsletter is brought to you by_**[**_Thinkst_**](https://thinkst.com/)**_, the makers of the much-loved_**[**_Thinkst Canary_**](https://canary.tools/)**_. You can subscribe to an audio version of this newsletter as a podcast by searching for &amp;#39;Risky Business&amp;#39; in…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Romanian officials are rebuilding the network from offline backups, users remain skeptical that these copies are up-to-date, warning that even minor data gaps could lead to widespread legal disputes over land claims &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978985&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Since the hack, officials restored their website and posted a message announcing they are rebuilding the agency&amp;#39;s entire network from scratch. Even if the hacker claims they deleted backups, the agency appears to have had an offline copy, otherwise things would have gotten really messy over the coming months in Romania. So it seems not all has been lost. I was worried about the societal implications of being unable to prove land ownership but it seems that may be avoided.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48979360&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d bet money the offline copy is far from up-to-date, given the state of the network. It still has potential to be mayhem&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48979847&quot; title=&quot;The problem is that everything will potentially be under dispute, since anyone can claim they purchased a patch of land whose registry was missed in the restoration&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Historical anecdotes suggest that when physical or digital registries are destroyed, recovery often relies on a &amp;#34;paper trail&amp;#34; of personal documents, sworn affidavits, and community testimonies to reconstruct ownership &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48980243&quot; title=&quot;This happened in a 50k people town where my father is from in 1982 with a BIG flood that destroyed the town land registry documents (among a lot of the town). Since he&amp;#39;s a lawyer, had first hand experience and I was always curious I asked many things about this a while back. Basically, what happened is that they rebuilt it from proof of ownership and testimonies of the people. You can never get to 100% recovery like that, but everyone knows who their neighbor is, at least in a town that is…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48982241&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Basically, what happened is that they rebuilt it from proof of ownership and testimonies of the people In a similar vein, I was once curious how you would prove your identity if ALL of your relevant documents (passport, driver&amp;#39;s license, birth certificate etc) were lost in some kind of cataclysm e.g. a house fire pre-digital etc Turns out there is actually a mechanism for this: - get multiple people to sign sworn affidavits that you are who you say you are - that begins the &amp;#39;paper trail&amp;#39; of…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48979736&quot; title=&quot;If its at least somewhat recent hopefully those affected still have paperwork for any property ownership transfers. Finding proof of property you bought decades ago would be a huge pain.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Some contributors attribute the vulnerability to systemic corruption in government IT contracting, while others suggest that decentralized technologies or traditional paper registries could offer better resilience against such attacks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48979351&quot; title=&quot;Finally, AI is giving us some real-world blockchain use cases (assuming the attack was helped by AI). Only half joking, BFT is petty much the most adversary-proof security guarantee we can get in a distributed system.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48979320&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s wrong with an old fashioned paper registry then?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48979365&quot; title=&quot;Romanian friends have told me that this is really due to corruption. Specifically: - government gives IT/data contracts to cronies - cronies don&amp;#39;t actually do any real security work to protect the data - things like this happen&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://airport.apunen.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Airport Simulator&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (airport.apunen.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48976846&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;767 points · 152 comments · by apunen&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Airport Simulator is a web-based tool created by @lapunen that allows users to monitor and manage simulated aircraft landings, departures, and flight paces. &lt;a href=&quot;https://airport.apunen.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Airport Simulator    URL Source: https://airport.apunen.com/    Warning: This is a cached snapshot of the original page, consider retry with caching opt-out.    Markdown Content:  Landings Laskeutumiset    Departures Lähtevät    Pace Lentoa/min/min    Duration Lentoaika 0:00    [Made by @lapunen](https://x.com/lapunen)&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on nostalgia for classic air traffic control games like *Flight Control* and *Heathrow ATC*, with users noting a lack of modern successors beyond titles like *Mini Metro* &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978041&quot; title=&quot;I was only thinking about Flight Control[0] the other day and how I wish there were more modern takes on it! There was Mini Metro[1], but that was released over a decade ago. -- [0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_Control [1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mini_Metro_(video_game)&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978235&quot; title=&quot;Not enough of you played Flight Control in 2008 and it shows.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978088&quot; title=&quot;Heathrow ATC (for the ZX Spectrum) was one that I played extensively back in the day: https://spectrumcomputing.co.uk/entry/10530 I wonder if there are earlier examples of popular ATC games?  They&amp;#39;re simpler than flight simulators so you&amp;#39;d think there would be more of them. Edit: playable version - https://archive.org/details/zx_Heathrow_International_Air_Tr...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While players enjoyed the simulation, they reported UI frustrations regarding overlapping flight paths, obscured maps, and a bug preventing the letter &amp;#34;e&amp;#34; in the high-score input &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978163&quot; title=&quot;This was really fun to play with, I have a few suggestions:  - As the airspace gets more congested, it becomes difficult to click the airplanes as you can also grab an existing path, messing everything up. - The big stats table on the top left completely obscures a good portion of the map, making it harder than necessary. A togglable or semi-transparent option would be nice. -The possibility of zooming or moving around could be nice&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48987735&quot; title=&quot;Strange. Can’t write “e” in the top scorer input box. Anyone else have this problem?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical anecdotes highlighted the game&amp;#39;s unrealistic physics, such as planes performing mid-air 180° turns, and a mention of *Auto Traffic Control*, a programming-based take on the genre where players write gRPC clients to manage airspace &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978111&quot; title=&quot;Took me far too long to work how to get a plane to land, was drawing lines along the runway rather than dropping them on the coloured spot at the end and they were overflying. Was thinking the paths weren&amp;#39;t straight enough, once I figured it out was quite funny to find the planes can do 180° turns mid air to land.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48980052&quot; title=&quot;In 2022 [0], Jan David Nose (jdno) released a game / programming challenge called _Auto Traffic Control_ [1]. Rather than controlling airplanes with UI interactions, the simulation is a GRPC server that expects the player to construct a game client that issues flight paths. I tried to make a game client for jdno&amp;#39;s ATC [2]. My client was deficient, as I tried to treat the movement as a fixed interval, by only submitting flight plans that moved in cartesian directions. Only by cheating, modifying…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978251&quot; title=&quot;Yeah to be more realistic they should be able to land from either end of the runway. Mayve depending on wind.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stratechery.com/2026/whos-afraid-of-chinese-models/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Who&amp;#39;s afraid of Chinese models?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (stratechery.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48977128&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;483 points · 331 comments · by mfiguiere&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of Chinese open-weight models like Kimi K3 highlights a shift toward AI intelligence becoming a commodity where profitability depends on superior cost structures rather than just R&amp;amp;D. To maintain leadership, the U.S. should embrace open-source innovation and loosen restrictive guardrails that currently drive domestic firms toward Chinese alternatives. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stratechery.com/2026/whos-afraid-of-chinese-models/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Who’s Afraid of Chinese Models?    URL Source: https://stratechery.com/2026/whos-afraid-of-chinese-models/    Published Time: 2026-07-20T11:00:08+00:00    Markdown Content:  **Listen to this **post**:**    There’s a story I tell about my first day in STRT-431 at Kellogg School of Management, the introductory class that every first-year MBA was required to take; I leafed through the readings and case studies and was dismayed that there weren’t any tech companies on the docket. Me being me, I spoke…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of Chinese LLMs poses a significant threat to the high valuations of U.S. frontier labs like OpenAI and Anthropic, as free open-weight models may force a &amp;#34;race to the bottom&amp;#34; in token pricing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48985619&quot; title=&quot;The people who are most afraid of Chinese models are the VCs who poured into Anthropic and OpenAI at astronomically high valuations. Anthropic is valued at $1.2T and OpenAI is targeting $850B. These astronomical valuations were built on the premise that these labs would generate massive profits from premium API pricing, but the Chinese labs are completely undercutting this strategy by releasing excellent open models for free. If the frontier labs are forced to cut prices and join the race to…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue these models are less efficient and more expensive for &amp;#34;real work&amp;#34; compared to optimized U.S. inference &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48985989&quot; title=&quot;The (quite excellent) article discusses several of your points. If you haven&amp;#39;t read it, I recommend it. - Commodity market profitability is determined by marginal cost of production. LLMs have marginal cost; traditional software does not.      - Models are not free. Downloading them is free. Running them is not. This has manufacturing economics, not software economics; the idea that they are &amp;#39;free&amp;#39; is an economic category error as it relates to their actual use      - The highest tier Chinese…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others highlight the strategic value of open models for auditing and local hosting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48985718&quot; title=&quot;People seem to conflate &amp;#39;made in China&amp;#39; with &amp;#39;can&amp;#39;t be trusted.&amp;#39; id argue the bigger distinction is open vs. closed. An open model can be audited, fine-tuned, and technically run entirely on your own hardware. A closed model is basically &amp;#39;trust us.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. However, significant concerns persist regarding the potential for Chinese models to act as &amp;#34;Trojan horses&amp;#34; by embedding political narratives or compromising data security &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48987747&quot; title=&quot;I am afraid — if Chinese models go mainstream it has a clear way of pushing its narrative way beyond its otherwise borders. More like a Trojan horse it is for the Chinese. Here is a quick example of how Chinese deepseeks agent works kn its underlying model) when asked a tough question https://x.com/jinen83/status/2079406993979383902?s=46&amp;amp;t=D7hQ...&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48987644&quot; title=&quot;The 2 things people need to remember: 1) China can (and does) use the models to influence the west. They train in false information about Taiwan and Hong Kong. Or pretend like history is in favor of China. 2) Ignoring the models containing false information, they are incredible. But you should be scared of running inference via the model creators directly. If you think your data is safe compared to running it via model providers in the US ( either frontier or model hosts like fireworks.ai )…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edri.org/our-work/the-eu-is-about-to-sell-our-most-sensitive-data-to-the-us-for-visa-free-travel/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The EU is about to sell our most sensitive data to the US for visa-free travel&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (edri.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48977711&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;492 points · 297 comments · by rapnie&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The European Commission is finalizing a deal to grant the U.S. access to biometric databases and traveler risk profiles in exchange for continued visa-free travel, sparking warnings from rights groups about mass surveillance and violations of EU privacy laws. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edri.org/our-work/the-eu-is-about-to-sell-our-most-sensitive-data-to-the-us-for-visa-free-travel/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The EU is about to sell our most sensitive data to the US for visa-free travel - European Digital Rights (EDRi)    URL Source: https://edri.org/our-work/the-eu-is-about-to-sell-our-most-sensitive-data-to-the-us-for-visa-free-travel/    Markdown Content:  The European Commission is currently finalising negotiations with the Trump administration to conclude an “Enhanced Border Security Partnership” (EBSP) Framework Agreement allowing border control authorities to screen travellers against…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters debate whether the proposed data sharing is a significant privacy loss, noting that the US already collects biometric data from visitors upon arrival &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978221&quot; title=&quot;The point missing in the article is that, in order to enter the US, one needs to give the US Govt their photo and fingerprints (&amp;#39;biometric data&amp;#39;) anyway. There are two options: visa-free with the biometric data passing on the wire (no hassle), or visa (a major hassle) and biometric data passing in the airport (a minor one). As a side note, the EU also collects photo and fingerprints from visitors now. Whereas in the US you only need to go through fingerprinting only once (or maybe &amp;#39;once per…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978537&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Whereas in the US you only need to go through fingerprinting only once Once for each arrival.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the agreement merely streamlines an existing process to maintain visa-free travel, others question why the US needs direct database access if they can verify fingerprints via physical passports &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978352&quot; title=&quot;If the US gets the data anyway, why the need for access?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978441&quot; title=&quot;The fingerprints in the passport can&amp;#39;t do that?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978542&quot; title=&quot;EU passports do.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights frustrations with the &amp;#34;fiction&amp;#34; of visa-free travel due to invasive ESTA requirements and anecdotes of aggressive, inconsistent enforcement by border officials &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978249&quot; title=&quot;I fail to understand the distinction between an ESTA and a visa to be honest. You need to do the paperwork in advance, pay, provide all sort of personal information, and it can be denied, and if approved only for a limited amount of time. Given that both the EU and the UK have reciprocated, it is a fiction that there exists some visa free travel between these 3 zones. And the more hassle you create, the less tourism you will get.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978586&quot; title=&quot;The average US border official is a (angry) moron (with a badge and a gun).  They&amp;#39;ve literally fingerprinted me on entry with a US passport because they were too stupid to figure out US citizens don&amp;#39;t have to do that.  I have been interrogated by CBP to ask if I &amp;#39;work in the country&amp;#39; despite being a citizen. Anything that changes the process from the simplest one-size-fits all will be fucked up, they cannot differentiate the process between foreigner and citizen let alone EU vs some other…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://robotics.xiaomi.com/xiaomi-robotics-1.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Xiaomi-Robotics-1&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (robotics.xiaomi.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48974454&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;468 points · 309 comments · by ilreb&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Xiaomi has unveiled Xiaomi-Robotics-1, a foundation model trained on over 100,000 hours of real-world data that uses a two-stage pre-training and alignment process to achieve state-of-the-art performance in complex robotic manipulation and task adaptation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://robotics.xiaomi.com/xiaomi-robotics-1.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Robotics @ XIAOMI    URL Source: https://robotics.xiaomi.com/xiaomi-robotics-1.html    Published Time: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 02:51:35 GMT    Markdown Content:  [Video 10](https://robotics.xiaomi.com/robot-static-resource/xiaomi-robotics-1/main.mp4)  **Breaking the data barrier.** Scaling robot policy models with embodiment-free pre-training.    Foundation models in language and vision keep moving the frontier by riding empirical scaling laws: capability tracks data, parameters, and compute. Robotics…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion is polarized between users who view the laundry-folding robot as a &amp;#34;magical&amp;#34; milestone for domestic automation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48975600&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not sure why some comments here are so pessimistic. I was grinning ear to ear while seeing the video. You&amp;#39;re telling me we&amp;#39;ve finally got robots that can do our laundry? And the model is at least as free as beer? To quote the lyrics/meme, we used to pray for times like this . This is what robotics should be used for.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48975650&quot; title=&quot;A subset of the people on HN hate AI and yell &amp;#39;slop&amp;#39; at everything they see. It&amp;#39;s even worse if you go to other social websites. Just ignore these people. If they don&amp;#39;t use AI, they likely won&amp;#39;t remain practicing in our field for much longer. They will naturally self-select themselves out of relevancy. I was Claude coding and got hit by the 3 AM reset bug. I went on reddit and saw hundreds of other engineers hit by the same. We are different people than the AI haters, and there has never been…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt; and skeptics who argue the demo is slow, sloppy, and impractical for real-world use &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48975778&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; You&amp;#39;re telling me we&amp;#39;ve finally got robots that can do our laundry? Did you watch it actually fold that shirt? Super slow and bad at it.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48975287&quot; title=&quot;Coining the term: Slopfold When you Robot folds your clothes but it&amp;#39;s kinda wrinkly and sloppy but you accept it anyway because it&amp;#39;s easier than precisely folded and pressed clothes.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48980703&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; You&amp;#39;re telling me we&amp;#39;ve finally got robots that can do our laundry? No, we don&amp;#39;t. I wish we did, that would be amazing. There have been demos like this over a decade. But they are just that, demos. Demos done in a controlled environment. If there was a robot I could buy that could effectively fold laundry or do dishes, I would gladly drop 50-100k on it, but such a thing doesn&amp;#39;t exist and likely won&amp;#39;t for a long time.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some attribute the negativity to anti-Chinese sentiment or a general modern distrust of technology &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48975884&quot; title=&quot;There tends to be a lot of low-key (and some not-so-low-key) anti-Chinese xenophobia on HN, so that&amp;#39;s likely a big part of it too.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48975800&quot; title=&quot;The pessimism in the comments here is entirely the reflection of the times we&amp;#39;re living in. Technology got weaponized against the average citizen. It has become a synonym for unemployment, enshittification, mass surveillance and social erosion. If this video appeared in 60&amp;#39;s or 70&amp;#39;s, people would be in awe imagining the future where robots do everything.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that such demos have existed for a decade without resulting in a viable consumer product &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48980703&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; You&amp;#39;re telling me we&amp;#39;ve finally got robots that can do our laundry? No, we don&amp;#39;t. I wish we did, that would be amazing. There have been demos like this over a decade. But they are just that, demos. Demos done in a controlled environment. If there was a robot I could buy that could effectively fold laundry or do dishes, I would gladly drop 50-100k on it, but such a thing doesn&amp;#39;t exist and likely won&amp;#39;t for a long time.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable suggestions for improvement include adding a third limb for better manipulation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48975185&quot; title=&quot;Watching the two-handed robot has me thinking that a third hand, perhaps with a different set of capabilities (like a tentacle grip) might make many tasks easier. I realise that more limbs = more problems, but even so, having additional ways to hold and turn things would be a big help.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, while the perceived value of the task varies wildly depending on the user&amp;#39;s household size and daily chores &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48975349&quot; title=&quot;Of all the tasks I do, folding clothes takes a ridiculously small slice of my time. Is this and all the other robotics videos aimed at H&amp;amp;M staff?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48975456&quot; title=&quot;Come back when you have a family and you run a washing machine full of clothes per day.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.kimi.com/products/kimi-work&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Kimi Work&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (kimi.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48981703&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;483 points · 203 comments · by ms7892&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kimi Work is a next-gen desktop AI agent designed to automate complex knowledge work through local file integration, autonomous web browsing, scheduled task execution, and specialized financial market analysis. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.kimi.com/products/kimi-work&quot; title=&quot;Title: Kimi Work: Next-Gen Desktop AI Agent for Knowledge Workers    URL Source: https://www.kimi.com/products/kimi-work    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: Kimi icon](https://www.kimi.com/landing-ui-assets/_next/static/media/kimi-logo.59a55296.png)    The AI Desktop for Knowledge Work    ## Your intelligent local agent    Deeply connected to your local files. Capable of browser automation. Running around the clock. Built for maximum productivity    ## Set It &amp;amp; Forget It: 24/7 Automation    Your workflow never…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kimi Work is widely criticized for being a &amp;#34;shameless&amp;#34; 1:1 visual clone of Codex, leading some to argue that such blatant copying undermines trust in Chinese AI labs seeking enterprise adoption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48983135&quot; title=&quot;kimi has been particularly shameless in copying codex 1:1, wow. Like, I get it, before condex there was conductor and a ton of other guis but this looks like they just copied the code. Also, their privacy disclosure is incredibly misleading: &amp;gt; How does Kimi Work protect my privacy when accessing local files?  You have absolute control over your files. The built-in Ask before acting safeguard means Kimi will prompt you for explicit authorization before it modifies, overwrites, or runs code within…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48984144&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a mistake to make this such an obvious copy. It will feed the narrative that Chinese entities cannot be trusted by the West. They could have varied it even slightly. It&amp;#39;s one thing with hardware because customers don&amp;#39;t need to trust suppliers any further than they can throw the box. But these labs seem to be battling for enterprise knowledge work-share. Trust is paramount, and they&amp;#39;re already behind on that front. Own goal.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others contend that the app layer is already being commoditized by dozens of clones and that offering a near-frontier model at a fraction of the price constitutes a winning product regardless of its origins &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48984341&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Kimi Work is a Local Agent designed for deep workflows. It mounts your local folders, navigates the web autonomously via WebBridge, runs Python code in the background, and executes scheduled tasks. It&amp;#39;s clearly a dupe of Claude/Codex products (Codex especially, styling-wise), but I think Kimi&amp;#39;s goal here is simply to appear on feature-parity with bigger labs. I doubt they&amp;#39;d want to invest much into designing a UI for &amp;#39;the future of agentic work&amp;#39; from the ground up. Their bread and butter and…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48984383&quot; title=&quot;People saying copy aren&amp;#39;t wrong...but if you can offer a copy at 1/5th of the price then you&amp;#39;ve got a winning product not a copy&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48985509&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; duping is a great way to show people that even the app layer can be commoditized Everyone is already cloning the app layer. There are 30+ claude-code clone, and codex work already cloned cowork, grok and gemini is doing the same.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant privacy concerns were raised regarding the agent&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;unfettered&amp;#34; read access to local files, though some users view this as a functional necessity for any coding agent &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48983135&quot; title=&quot;kimi has been particularly shameless in copying codex 1:1, wow. Like, I get it, before condex there was conductor and a ton of other guis but this looks like they just copied the code. Also, their privacy disclosure is incredibly misleading: &amp;gt; How does Kimi Work protect my privacy when accessing local files?  You have absolute control over your files. The built-in Ask before acting safeguard means Kimi will prompt you for explicit authorization before it modifies, overwrites, or runs code within…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48983230&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;They fail to mention that is has unfettered read access to your files. Isn&amp;#39;t that totally expected of a coding agent? Otherwise it&amp;#39;s like complaining dropbox &amp;#39;has unfettered access to your files&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://wren.wtf/shower-thoughts/stop-using-opencode/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Annoying and alarming things about OpenCode&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (wren.wtf)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978112&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;379 points · 247 comments · by alekq&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that OpenCode is a fundamentally broken and insecure AI coding agent characterized by severe performance issues, ineffective &amp;#34;textual&amp;#34; security filters for bash commands, and critical vulnerabilities that expose users to remote code execution. &lt;a href=&quot;https://wren.wtf/shower-thoughts/stop-using-opencode/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Stop Using OpenCode    URL Source: https://wren.wtf/shower-thoughts/stop-using-opencode/    Published Time: Mon, 18 May 2026 08:43:52 GMT    Markdown Content:  If you don’t know what OpenCode is, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever. The boot is made of TypeScript and the face is everything we have learned about security and systems software since the invention of the electronic computer in the 1940s. The [creators](https://opencode.ai/) describe it as an AI coding agent. As far as I…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Critics argue that OpenCode suffers from significant technical inefficiencies, such as poor prompt caching and bloated &amp;#34;vibe-coded&amp;#34; features that degrade performance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978591&quot; title=&quot;I feel that a better title for this article would be: &amp;#39;Some minor annoyances that, when fixed, would improve OpenCode&amp;#39; # Prompt Cache Misses &amp;gt; It globs your filesystem and re-reads AGENTS.md (injected in turn-0 system prompt) on every SSE turn. If you put a quick note in AGENTS.md to be read in the next session, you immediately force a full re-evaluation. &amp;gt; Personal favourite: it puts the current date in the turn-0 system prompt and re-evaluates every SSE turn. If you’re using OpenCode at…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48979182&quot; title=&quot;The bigger point is that the codebase is hopelessly bloated by vibe coded features at this point, mirroring the same problems with Claude Code. And stability, performance, memory use have all gotten terrible. I liked Opencode a lot previously but there&amp;#39;s no doubt it&amp;#39;s not well-written software. Pi has fully replaced it for me and there are quite a few newer options that learned from Opencode and exercise more minimalism where it matters&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find the software&amp;#39;s security posture and &amp;#34;opinionated&amp;#34; system prompts alarming, others contend these issues are inherent to all agentic CLIs rather than unique to OpenCode &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978907&quot; title=&quot;This is a good summary of the dangers of using agentic clis, but the title &amp;amp; general focus on opencode is odd for two reasons: 1. Most obviously &amp;amp; importantly this is a complaint without a straightforward suggested alternative. A sibling commenter mentions suggesting fixes to Opencode would be more productive: I don&amp;#39;t necessarily agree since many of these issues are fundamental &amp;amp; would likely require an almost ground up rethink &amp;amp; rewrite, but the issue is that the article contains no…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48979136&quot; title=&quot;I wonder how he imagines you can give shell access but securely prevent arbitrary command execution. His complaint that &amp;#39;echo git | bash&amp;#39; still works is particularly nutty.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these frustrations, the tool remains popular for its rare free-tier access, though many users report successfully migrating to alternatives like Pi for better stability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978573&quot; title=&quot;I switched from OpenCode to Pi and there was a big improvement in terms of tool calling performance and I find the experience less buggy. OpenCode has also seemed to have disappeared from https://openrouter.ai/apps/category/coding&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48979182&quot; title=&quot;The bigger point is that the codebase is hopelessly bloated by vibe coded features at this point, mirroring the same problems with Claude Code. And stability, performance, memory use have all gotten terrible. I liked Opencode a lot previously but there&amp;#39;s no doubt it&amp;#39;s not well-written software. Pi has fully replaced it for me and there are quite a few newer options that learned from Opencode and exercise more minimalism where it matters&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978528&quot; title=&quot;Opencode offers free models with 200/requests over 5 hours. That&amp;#39;s why I use it. It is the only reason I care about. What&amp;#39;s the alternative there? Gemini used to have free tiers. Qwen used to. AMP used to. Ollama cloud used to. Codebuff used to... None of them have those programs anymore The reason I use it is purely financial. I do not have an employer and I&amp;#39;m writing free software Edit: pi.dev doesn&amp;#39;t have free inference endpoints. That&amp;#39;s the constraint.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.emergingtrajectories.com/lh/frontier-lab-economics/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Kimi K3, Qwen 3.8, and Anthropic&amp;#39;s (Potential) Unravelling&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (emergingtrajectories.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48980019&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;323 points · 302 comments · by cl42&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The launch of Kimi K3 and Qwen 3.8 demonstrates that open-source models are reaching the performance frontier, threatening the market position of model-only labs like Anthropic. Without owning infrastructure like data centers or power plants, these labs face high inference costs and diminishing product differentiation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.emergingtrajectories.com/lh/frontier-lab-economics/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Kimi K3, Qwen 3.8, and Anthropic&amp;#39;s (potential) Unravelling    URL Source: https://www.emergingtrajectories.com/lh/frontier-lab-economics/    Published Time: 2026-07-19    Markdown Content:  This past week, two state-of-the-art (SOTA) foundation models were launched: Moonshot Labs&amp;#39; Kimi K3[[1]](https://www.emergingtrajectories.com/lh/frontier-lab-economics/#ref-1) and Alibaba&amp;#39;s Qwen 3.8[[2]](https://www.emergingtrajectories.com/lh/frontier-lab-economics/#ref-2). Both are allegedly close to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rapid advancement of open-weight models has narrowed the gap with frontier labs to mere weeks, leading some to believe the industry is plateauing or shifting toward a &amp;#34;good enough&amp;#34; era &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48980871&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s amazing how quickly Fable went from &amp;#39;Game-changing model that needs to be banned&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;Yeah it&amp;#39;s alright, but OpenAI is also just as good and there are a couple of good open weight alternatives that are equivalent for almost everything&amp;#39; The hype cycles are shortening, perhaps we really are reaching some kind of plateau this time (famous last words)&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48981189&quot; title=&quot;Open-weight models were lagging 4 months behind OpenAI/Anthropic at the beginning of the year. They are now just 4-6 weeks behind.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. This shift suggests a future where the winner is determined by hardware efficiency—specifically burning models into ASICs for massive speed gains—rather than marginal intelligence improvements &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48980866&quot; title=&quot;The open weight, open architecture releases of the past several days has me more convinced that ultimately, the winner will be whoever burns their models to ASICs fastest. The LLMs themselves are capable of doing some aspects of chip design as evinced by  the K3 press release. Furthermore, the frontier models are &amp;#39;good enough&amp;#39; for a wide swathe of tasks and will soon hit that threshold for a good amount of software engineering (if not already). Does anyone think we need a Mythos level model to…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48981379&quot; title=&quot;The tokens per second performance numbers coming from Cerebrus/Talas are several orders of magnitude higher than models running on GPUs, which is such a huge step change that it will enable many more uses of LLMs that are impractical otherwise. I.e. think about gamers and burning in an LLM chip on a game console like a future Play Station - it doesn&amp;#39;t matter if its a frontier LLM if it allows them to talk to in game characters in real time and have the LLM drive the storyline. The devs may be…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others argue that architectural volatility makes specialized chips risky and that users will remain loyal to whichever programmable GPU-based provider offers the absolute &amp;#34;best&amp;#34; model &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48981023&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not convinced, mostly because things like crypto, which I believe went into ASICs, were based on very slowly moving and mostly understood algorithms. LLMs and model architectures seems significantly more volatile. I wouldn&amp;#39;t want to be working out the finer details of my chip rollout only to find a new paper/approach that give multiples of performance. So I guess it depends on how much the latest-greatest model motivates people, and my read on the current churn is that developers are…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48980545&quot; title=&quot;I think the risk is overstated. For one, on the margin people are willing to pay a lot for slightly better models. I know personally the value the LLM adds to my workflow is considerably more than the $200/m I pay the frontier labs. I have no interest in optimizing that to get it slightly lower. There are a very vocal minority that optimizes this or companies whose LLM expense is marginal, but I think that&amp;#39;s the minority (correct me if I&amp;#39;m wrong, curious what their customer base looks like)…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Meanwhile, concerns are rising regarding the defensibility of &amp;#34;model-only&amp;#34; businesses, as labs increasingly cannibalize their own partners by building application layers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48980631&quot; title=&quot;I keep thinking about the Figma thing. If you&amp;#39;re unaware, here&amp;#39;s the google summary: ---- The Board Departure: Mike Krieger, Anthropic’s CPO and a co-founder of Instagram, sat on Figma’s board of directors. He resigned on April 14, just days before news of Claude Design broke. This sparked speculation over conflict of interest and the use of proprietary product strategy information. Betrayal of Partnership: The launch aggravated the tech industry because Figma relied on Anthropic&amp;#39;s models to…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48980486&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; More importantly, as sustainable long-term businesses, model-only providers are particularly at risk. Knowledge Atlas, Moonshot Labs, and Anthropic face defensibility challenges versus OpenAI, Alibaba, SpaceX, Meta, and Google. Hm. How is OpenAI not a “model-only” provider just like Anthropic? Seems like they are vulnerable in the same way.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48980692&quot; title=&quot;To everyone praising Open weight models, could you answer a simple question? If Anthropic doesn&amp;#39;t make money because of distillation attacks, how would they convince investors to invest in them, such that it makes financial sense for Anthropic to train even bigger models? Assuming it is preferable for everyone that we get better models in the future. Distillation attacks remove the financial incentive.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://slcyber.io/research-center/exploit-brokers-pay-500000-for-a-wordpress-rce-i-found-one-with-gpt5-6/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I found a WordPress RCEs with GPT5.6 and $25&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (slcyber.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48975665&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;388 points · 212 comments · by infosecau&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Using the GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra model and a $25 budget, a researcher discovered a critical pre-authentication remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in WordPress by chaining a batch API validation bypass with a complex SQL injection and in-memory cache poisoning to escalate privileges to administrator. &lt;a href=&quot;https://slcyber.io/research-center/exploit-brokers-pay-500000-for-a-wordpress-rce-i-found-one-with-gpt5-6/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Exploit brokers pay $500,000 for a WordPress RCE. I found one with GPT5.6 Sol Ultra and $25 › Searchlight Cyber    URL Source: https://slcyber.io/research-center/exploit-brokers-pay-500000-for-a-wordpress-rce-i-found-one-with-gpt5-6/    Published Time: 2026-07-20T08:04:56+00:00    Markdown Content:  _If you’re running WordPress and want to check if your instance is vulnerable, you can use our tool we’ve hosted here:_[_https://wp2shell.com/_](https://wp2shell.com/)_._    _We held off on publishing…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discovery of a WordPress RCE using an LLM has sparked criticism of the platform&amp;#39;s codebase, with commenters lamenting the continued use of string concatenation for SQL queries in 2026 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48976285&quot; title=&quot;https://github.com/WordPress/WordPress/commit/3a640e1c5e39aa... String concatenation SQL injection in the year 2026.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48976338&quot; title=&quot;The WordPress codebase is a disgrace. PHP is a beautiful language by now, but they absolutely butcher it and refuse to do anything about that.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48976428&quot; title=&quot;What an awful fix. Does WordPress seriously still use basic string concatenation (edit: and sprintf) to build SQL queries?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some defend the stagnant architecture as a necessary trade-off for backwards compatibility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48976996&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s just because they don&amp;#39;t want to break anything in existing sites, sorta like how Microsoft doesn&amp;#39;t generally want to break programs on Windows. So, changes are fairly incremental, and the quality is about what you&amp;#39;d expect from a piece of software that&amp;#39;s decades old with no plan for what happens if it got this far. But what do you do in that situation? If they change the structure too much, then either they make it impossible to upgrade an existing site, or potentially break a whole bunch…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others mock the &amp;#34;Code is Poetry&amp;#34; mantra given the persistent security flaws &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48977029&quot; title=&quot;The great irony is they still sport their &amp;#39;Code is Poetry&amp;#39; mantra on their website [0]. If code is poetry, Wordpress is a new genre of it, probably? [0]: https://codex.wordpress.org/WordPress_Philosophy&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant skepticism exists regarding the claimed $500k valuation of the exploit, with experts arguing that WordPress data rarely warrants such high prices compared to mobile OS exploits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48977439&quot; title=&quot;There is no evidence that $500k has been paid or would be paid for an exploit like this one. Given that the article says that prompts are modified like they are holy scripture, perhaps sell the prompt for $500k. The author works for https://www.assetnote.io/ , which has AI products for automated scanning.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978120&quot; title=&quot;I work in the field and I just cannot believe anyone would pay that much for a Word Press exploit. People pay money for iOS or Android because there is valuable information stored on devices running those operating systems. There&amp;#39;s absolutely nothing of value on any Word Press site. The only possible reason I can think of is for a watering hole attack, but that would require a second exploit that would be worth far more (and they aren&amp;#39;t).&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48976150&quot; title=&quot;The surprising (and possibly untrue) thing is the high price of canned vulnerabilities. WordPress is known as the remote root shell with a blogging feature.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, there is debate over whether researchers using AI tools deserve professional credit or bug bounties &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48976399&quot; title=&quot;I like the idea of not crediting the person who posted the bug but to the LLM that found it. People who find exploits using LLMs should never get a reward or credit.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jelly-ui.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Jelly UI: Soft-body physics for native HTML form controls&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jelly-ui.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48981620&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;419 points · 143 comments · by baldvinmar&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jelly UI is a dependency-free Web Components library that features 40 custom elements with soft-body physics, dark mode, and WCAG AA accessibility support. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jelly-ui.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Jelly UI — Soft Web Components    URL Source: https://jelly-ui.com/    Published Time: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 23:06:45 GMT    Markdown Content:  ## It&amp;#39;s okay to be    a little jelly    Jelly UI is a dependency-free Web Components library for soft, tactile product interfaces. Real form controls meet soft-body physics, with dark mode, right-to-left support and WCAG AA color tokens built in.    0 dependencies 40 custom elements 1 script tag WCAG AA Dark mode RTL    Scroll the showcase ↓Read the API reference…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the library&amp;#39;s performance, with critics noting that its animation loop forces constant document-wide repaints every 8ms, leading to lag and high power consumption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48983683&quot; title=&quot;Saw the window was a bit laggy so thought I&amp;#39;d delve deeper to figure out what was going on. This lib runs a a RAF animation loop every 8ms across every component on the page that causes the entire document to repaint. The comment above appears of the AI generated sort:  // One shared animation frame: step every live component, park when idle.  // The delta is capped so a background-tab pause never becomes one giant step. The &amp;#39;JellyEngine&amp;#39; instead of just calculating the jelly animation on pointer…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48985102&quot; title=&quot;Video games only get away with this because their energy draw is obvious: one launched the video game, so one expects the power draw. Visiting a web page does not have that action-reaction causality in people’s minds. Having a random web page introduce maximally-inefficient repaints also leads browsers to start reducing timeslices — especially those with any sort of power drain cognizance, such as Safari — which, here, leads to hella janky animations that can’t cope without their inefficient…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this mirrors standard video game rendering, others contend that web users do not expect the same energy draw as a game and that browsers like Safari may throttle such inefficient loops &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48984708&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This is the kind of thing usually a human notices and says &amp;#39;dont do that, that is kind of crazy&amp;#39;. It&amp;#39;s not crazy. That is literally what 99.99% of video games do. They repaint everything constantly, only limited by either your vsync rate or hardware.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48984794&quot; title=&quot;Presumably in a video game the majority of the screen changes every frame. Not so in web pages.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48985102&quot; title=&quot;Video games only get away with this because their energy draw is obvious: one launched the video game, so one expects the power draw. Visiting a web page does not have that action-reaction causality in people’s minds. Having a random web page introduce maximally-inefficient repaints also leads browsers to start reducing timeslices — especially those with any sort of power drain cognizance, such as Safari — which, here, leads to hella janky animations that can’t cope without their inefficient…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the demo&amp;#39;s use of scroll-snapping was criticized for creating a frustrating user experience, though some found the implementation enjoyable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48982962&quot; title=&quot;Please never use scroll-snap as is done on this demo page (unrelated to the soft-body physics). It leads to an awful experience for a large fraction of users. It improves things in one or two scenarios, but at the cost of far more common great frustration. Scroll-snap is a really risky feature, very niche in its reasonable applications. This is definitely not a suitable place to use it.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48983852&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It leads to an awful experience for a large fraction of users. can you give an example of why/how? I thought it was well done and enjoyable. Regular fast scroll was still as expected, and then the slower interactions felt like slide changes.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/hgaiser/moonshine&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Moonshine: Lets you stream games from your PC to any device running Moonlight&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48972970&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;336 points · 142 comments · by wertyk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moonshine is a Rust-based, headless streaming server for Linux that allows users to stream games to Moonlight clients using isolated sessions. It supports hardware video encoding, HDR, and full input passthrough without requiring a physical monitor or interrupting the host&amp;#39;s desktop environment. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/hgaiser/moonshine&quot; title=&quot;GitHub - hgaiser/moonshine: Headless streaming server for Moonlight clients, written in Rust.    Headless streaming server for Moonlight clients, written in Rust. - hgaiser/moonshine    [Skip to content](#start-of-content)    ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [Sign in](/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fhgaiser%2Fmoonshine)    Appearance settings    * Platform      + AI CODE CREATION      - [GitHub CopilotWrite better code with AI](https://github.com/features/copilot)      - [GitHub Copilot…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moonshine is a Linux-based game streaming server that differentiates itself from Sunshine by creating its own compositor, allowing for headless operation and HDR support without requiring a physical monitor or dummy plug &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48976789&quot; title=&quot;Ah so this is where the influx of activity comes from.. Hi, creator of Moonshine here. I&amp;#39;ll try to answer some common questions here instead of replying the same thing everywhere: What is it? At it&amp;#39;s core it&amp;#39;s similar to Sunshine but with one important difference: Moonshine creates its own compositor and does not rely on an existing desktop environment. The benefits: - You do not need a running desktop environment: it can run headless. - The compositor is created with any resolution and any…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The project is part of a broader evolution of open-source streaming tools, following the deprecation of Nvidia Gamestream and the rise of alternatives like Apollo and &amp;#34;Game on Whales&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48974648&quot; title=&quot;So, to sum up: First there was Nvidia Gamestream, which was proprietary and later deprecated by Nvidia themselves. Then came Sunshine and Moonlight, open source server and client implementations of the protocol to allow low latency streaming for all platforms. Along the way the Game on Whales project started, to allow multi seat streaming plus virtual displays so currently logged in user sessions aren&amp;#39;t impacted. Basically this is a whole &amp;#39;host your own Stadia/Geforce Now&amp;#39; solution. But instead…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users note that Sunshine can already function headlessly with hardware workarounds &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48976234&quot; title=&quot;But Sunshine _is_ headless, I would know if it weren&amp;#39;t, I&amp;#39;m using it as such (albeit with a dummy plug, but that&amp;#39;s just a hardware limitation).&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, Moonshine&amp;#39;s creator emphasizes its lean codebase and ability to run games simultaneously without impacting an existing desktop session &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48976789&quot; title=&quot;Ah so this is where the influx of activity comes from.. Hi, creator of Moonshine here. I&amp;#39;ll try to answer some common questions here instead of replying the same thing everywhere: What is it? At it&amp;#39;s core it&amp;#39;s similar to Sunshine but with one important difference: Moonshine creates its own compositor and does not rely on an existing desktop environment. The benefits: - You do not need a running desktop environment: it can run headless. - The compositor is created with any resolution and any…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also touched on the potential for Steam to enter the cloud gaming market, though commenters debated the feasibility of scaling GPU infrastructure during the current AI hardware craze &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48974754&quot; title=&quot;The steam link actual. While the hardware is no longer being sold the software sort of lives on. In an android app among other things. Tangentially it almost feels like steam could make a stadia like thing work. They have most of the moving parts including crucially, the bit google didn&amp;#39;t, an established base of customers. Tomorrow steam could introduce a &amp;#39;play your games anywhere on any hardware&amp;#39; feature and no one would be surprised.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48974937&quot; title=&quot;Wouldnt they need racks of GPUs to do that at scale?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48975923&quot; title=&quot;The cloud is just someone else&amp;#39;s computer. Do you think there&amp;#39;s spare GPU compute available during the AI craze?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://spectrum.ieee.org/led-light-pollution&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LEDs’ potential to save our night skies&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (spectrum.ieee.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978350&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;228 points · 172 comments · by defrost&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While LED technology offers precise control over color and intensity, its low cost has paradoxically increased global light pollution and health risks; however, experts argue that implementing digital networking and warmer spectrums could significantly reduce energy waste and restore starlit skies. &lt;a href=&quot;https://spectrum.ieee.org/led-light-pollution&quot; title=&quot;Title: How LEDs Are Making Light Pollution Worse    URL Source: https://spectrum.ieee.org/led-light-pollution    Published Time: 2026-07-20T13:00:01Z    Markdown Content:  The River Thames is aglow with light reflected from the Vauxhall and Nine Elms skyscraper clusters [left] and the illuminated face of the Millbank Tower [right].    **In the chill of**a London spring night, under overcast skies, iconic Trafalgar Square opens around me. Admiral Nelson rises on his pedestal, the National Gallery rests…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The decline of the night sky is attributed to urban light pollution, greenhouse lighting, and satellite constellations, though users disagree on whether the latter is a significant threat or easily mitigated by modern imaging techniques &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48980032&quot; title=&quot;Greenhouses here in the lower mainland of British Columbia have been devastating to the night sky. It&amp;#39;s quite depressing how little society values the night sky, something that&amp;#39;s been an important part of every human culture for longer than recorded history. I&amp;#39;ve taken friends out to thoroughly mediocre skies (Bortle 4-5) and they&amp;#39;ve been very impressed, because they&amp;#39;re used to city lights (Bortle 9) where you can maybe see a few of the brightest stars and planets. If you&amp;#39;ve never seen truly…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48982421&quot; title=&quot;Starlink gets a lot of flax for it but as an avid night sky photographer myself (IG: @dheeranet) who regularly goes to Bortle 1 parts of the world, I haven&amp;#39;t found them to be an issue at all. 1. They are only visible when they are spinning up to orbit 2. They are too dim to desensitize your eyes, and are extremely easy to remove with the most basic of outlier rejection techniques; netizens often amplifiy outliers by max-stacking instead of outlier-rejected mean-stacking to make Starlink look…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48982593&quot; title=&quot;(1) Considering there are now multiple companies planning to launch their own fleets of tens of thousands, satellites need replacing, etc, even if this was completely accurate, this will be a continuous and ongoing issue as it has been for years. (2) The standards for astrophotography and for professional astronomical measurements are somewhat different! Also, I think you meant median stacking; mean stacking doesn&amp;#39;t handle outliers as well. (3) Whataboutism. Besides, you&amp;#39;d get no argument from…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some advocate for motion-sensored lighting or personal headlamps to balance safety and darkness, others argue that public lighting is essential for crime prevention during winter commutes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48979451&quot; title=&quot;Where I live, we have a small park, 500m away. You need to walk through it if you want to get to the city center from the small neighborhood we live in. To protect the wildlife, the lighting system has presence sensors, so as you walk or bicycle through the park, the way/street lighting turns on, you can walk, and just after you, it turns dark again. Really cool, especially the first time I went through it in the middle of the night.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48979941&quot; title=&quot;Wouldn&amp;#39;t it be more reasonable to just expect people who want to walk places in the dead of night to wear a headlamp? They&amp;#39;re cheap, easy to recharge, and can be adjusted for various brightness levels.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48980264&quot; title=&quot;The problem is not just with people who want to walk places, but people who want to mug/murder/rape those that do. As an example, in the UK, councils are expected to light commonly-traveled paths, both so path users can see where they&amp;#39;re going, and to reduce crime. Unlit paths in city parks are still traversed, and are often a haven for crime. &amp;#39;Dead of night&amp;#39; isn&amp;#39;t the right image. 5PM in winter with clouds (as is typical in the UK) has roughly the same level of natural light as 2AM. People are…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion highlights a cultural divide: some view the loss of the stars as a profound historical tragedy, while others prioritize agricultural productivity or note that most people are indifferent to astronomical views &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48980032&quot; title=&quot;Greenhouses here in the lower mainland of British Columbia have been devastating to the night sky. It&amp;#39;s quite depressing how little society values the night sky, something that&amp;#39;s been an important part of every human culture for longer than recorded history. I&amp;#39;ve taken friends out to thoroughly mediocre skies (Bortle 4-5) and they&amp;#39;ve been very impressed, because they&amp;#39;re used to city lights (Bortle 9) where you can maybe see a few of the brightest stars and planets. If you&amp;#39;ve never seen truly…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48980072&quot; title=&quot;Dude your country is 98% desolate and unsuited to agriculture.  If you want night sky go to a cabin literally anywhere in your unending and cold mountains instead of shutting down agriculture in the only marginal spot on the west coast you can grow food.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48981028&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not that big a deal for MOST people. I was on navy ships transiting the Pacific it&amp;#39;s as dark as it can get on deck and sure, it&amp;#39;s magical and spectacular (especially the NUMBER OF SHOOTING STARS!) but even in the middle of the ocean 99% of my fellow sailors could not have given less of a shit. I&amp;#39;d sit out there for hours and they all though I was a weirdo for it. So, while amazing, most people don&amp;#39;t understand or care to understand the enormity of what&amp;#39;s going on around them. Most people…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://xenaproject.wordpress.com/2026/07/20/human-mathematicians-are-being-outcounterexampled/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Human mathematicians are being outcounterexampled&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (xenaproject.wordpress.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48983382&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;288 points · 102 comments · by artninja1988&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AI tools have reportedly disproved several long-standing mathematical theories, including Erdős’ Unit Distance conjecture and the Jacobian Conjecture, by generating counterexamples that were subsequently verified through Lean formalization. &lt;a href=&quot;https://xenaproject.wordpress.com/2026/07/20/human-mathematicians-are-being-outcounterexampled/&quot; title=&quot;Human mathematicians are being outcounterexampled    It’s been an interesting few weeks for counterexamples. This post is basically my perspective of what has been going on in the world of formalization, AI tools and, in particular, counterexam…    [Xena](https://xenaproject.wordpress.com/ &amp;#39;Xena&amp;#39;)    Mathematicians learning Lean by doing.    [![](https://xenaproject.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/cropped-light2.png)](https://xenaproject.wordpress.com/ &amp;#39;Xena&amp;#39;)    [Skip to content](#content &amp;#39;Skip…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The use of AI to find mathematical counterexamples is seen as a &amp;#34;fruitful use of humanity&amp;#39;s time&amp;#34; because it prevents researchers from wasting years attempting to prove false conjectures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48984371&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s a good thing. It saves people wasting time trying to prove something they now know to be false, so that they can move on to other things to prove, it&amp;#39;s a more fruitful use of humanity&amp;#39;s time overall at least in the field of mathematics.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48985400&quot; title=&quot;I was once in a presentation for a math PhD thesis. During the thesis, the evaluator of the thesis noticed a flaw in their proof. The student understood and then asked “What now?”  The evaluator prof simply shrugged.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue these discoveries simply reflect a lack of human focus on specific search spaces &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48984238&quot; title=&quot;Human mathematicians have been being out-counterexampled for at least two decades. The main difference, as I understand, is that (A) we now have a lot more compute to throw at such things, and (B) it is currently trendy to do so. But the sizes of counterexample we&amp;#39;re seeing are around about what I&amp;#39;d expect pre-generative-AI counterexample search systems to be able to find. It&amp;#39;s not easy to find a counterexample to the Jacobian conjecture, by any means – by which I mean to say that naïve…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the versatility of modern AI marks a significant shift from previous &amp;#34;expert systems&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48987865&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; about what I&amp;#39;d expect pre-generative-AI counterexample search systems to be able to find. The difference today (and the reason why everyone is excited about it) is that the same system that does advanced math can write poetry, play an above average game of chess, code frontend/backend stuff and do cybersec. These are not &amp;#39;expert systems&amp;#39;, nor are they trained for each task individually. That&amp;#39;s the catch. &amp;gt;  just indicated that humans had not spent enough time thinking about the problem Heh,…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these advancements, commenters emphasize that human mathematicians remain essential for crafting prompts, navigating vast search spaces, and providing the &amp;#34;elegant or illuminating&amp;#34; proofs that AI-generated counterexamples lack &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48984953&quot; title=&quot;proofs by counterexample are effective but ultimately unsatisfying. they get you to an answer but they don&amp;#39;t help help you understand and bend you r mind into seeing how the math works and lead you on to the new set of questions. and for now as long humans are going to judge of what counts as an elegant or illuminating proof, there&amp;#39;s going to be work for human mathematicians&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48984329&quot; title=&quot;mathematicians have been using computers for well over  half a century, but this was after &amp;#39;bounding&amp;#39; the problem first and then running through the cases with a computer.  Now AI is doing the first part. However, mathematicians are still needed at crafting prompts, and knowing where to look, still. The prompt for the Jacobian conjecture was obviously not random. the search space is too big to just try all the combinations of 3 variable polynomials.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48984367&quot; title=&quot;This is the best take. Computers don&amp;#39;t care about this stuff. A computer could make a movie, but only a human can appreciate it. We&amp;#39;re a good team, and that&amp;#39;s ok.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theregister.com/columnists/2026/07/20/airbus-takes-flight-from-aws-what-happens-next-is-critical/5274109&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Airbus Takes Flight from AWS&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theregister.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48976682&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;200 points · 159 comments · by bbg2401&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Airbus is migrating 900 critical applications from AWS to French provider Scaleway to ensure digital sovereignty and protect sensitive data from U.S. government access, though the aerospace giant remains reliant on American providers for supply chain management and productivity software. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theregister.com/columnists/2026/07/20/airbus-takes-flight-from-aws-what-happens-next-is-critical/5274109&quot; title=&quot;Title: Airbus takes flight from AWS. What happens next is critical    URL Source: https://www.theregister.com/columnists/2026/07/20/airbus-takes-flight-from-aws-what-happens-next-is-critical/5274109    Published Time: 2026-07-20T09:15:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  REG AD    columnists    Which way to the Land of the Free again?    OPINION European aerospace giant Airbus has lined up on the runway and is pushing the throttles forward as it prepares to evict apps from America.    Airbus has named French cloud…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The shift away from AWS is driven by growing concerns over US foreign policy and potential industrial espionage, leading many European organizations to prefer local suppliers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48977892&quot; title=&quot;US tech does not understand or comprehend the amount of damage they’ve self inflicted in the last couple of years. There will be a steady drip of this in years to come, I suspect.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48977133&quot; title=&quot;Do we have proven (or probable) case of USA industrial espionage ?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978443&quot; title=&quot;What doesn&amp;#39;t get talked about in these articles is the increasing impact to small business in the US. I run a small business (scanii.com) and I&amp;#39;ve noticed over the past year an increasing number of customers leaving us to European competitors, customers that have been happy with us for years, using our European region, but now have concerns over US foreign policy and are giving preferred treatment to EU suppliers. When I asked they said, I&amp;#39;m paraphrasing here, &amp;#39;happy with the product but…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48977481&quot; title=&quot;Is Airbus still using Google workspaces for mail? Nice vector for industrial espionage. Why did Airbus go to &amp;#39;the cloud&amp;#39; in the first place? It seems complete overkill for a company like that.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that US tech companies understand this damage, others blame the US administration for the resulting loss of international market share for small businesses &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978443&quot; title=&quot;What doesn&amp;#39;t get talked about in these articles is the increasing impact to small business in the US. I run a small business (scanii.com) and I&amp;#39;ve noticed over the past year an increasing number of customers leaving us to European competitors, customers that have been happy with us for years, using our European region, but now have concerns over US foreign policy and are giving preferred treatment to EU suppliers. When I asked they said, I&amp;#39;m paraphrasing here, &amp;#39;happy with the product but…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978253&quot; title=&quot;US Tech does understand, US Administration does not.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48979044&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I fear rough waters ahead. For 2.5 more years.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant disagreement regarding provider quality; some users prefer the ease of use of platforms like Digital Ocean, while others argue that competent suppliers must require strict identity verification, as seen with Hetzner &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48977246&quot; title=&quot;A study in contrasts, I signed up my business with Hetzner. And the first thing I saw during onboarding was a demand to upload my ID to spend $5 to test their service (I was testing before we bought). I wrote to customer service and got, Dear Client,            We received your email. Thanks for writing to us.            You have probably realized that this is an automated message.            We need some time to process each email that we receive, but we will write back to you personally as soon as…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48977363&quot; title=&quot;I haven&amp;#39;t found a competent supplier who doesn&amp;#39;t want to know who you are. I entirely exclude Digital Ocean from competent suppliers.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, the move to the cloud is often viewed as a management-driven attempt to outsource IT problems, though the strategic risks of using US-based infrastructure are becoming harder for global firms to ignore &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48977556&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t fully understand why companies use AWS. Is it a management driven or engineering driven decision? I assume management - in big companies some exec from Amazon comes to play golf, and in small companies the managers copy what the big companies are doing?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48977524&quot; title=&quot;Everyone went to &amp;#39;the cloud&amp;#39; because they want to make their IT problems someone else&amp;#39;s problem. It&amp;#39;s no different from the previous era of MSPs, except that there are now only, like, five MSPs in the world. Note: I mean the Google Docs and Microsoft 365 type of cloud not the AWS and Azure type of cloud&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://unslop.run/blog/measuring-ai-writing-on-arxiv&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How we measured AI writing across arXiv, and where the measurement breaks&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (unslop.run)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48981206&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;206 points · 151 comments · by dopamine_daddy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A study of 12,750 arXiv papers found that approximately one-third of new submissions appear machine-written, with computer science reaching a 65% flag rate while mathematics remains the lowest at 0.7%. &lt;a href=&quot;https://unslop.run/blog/measuring-ai-writing-on-arxiv&quot; title=&quot;Title: How we measured AI writing across arXiv, and where the measurement breaks    URL Source: https://unslop.run/blog/measuring-ai-writing-on-arxiv    Markdown Content:  We scored the full text of 12,750 arXiv papers and found that about a third of new ones read as machine-written. Here is the method, the results, and an honest account of the limitations.    ![Image 1: Share of new arXiv papers flagged as machine-written, 2021 to 2026, at a threshold calibrated so pre-ChatGPT papers flag at 0.4%.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Analysis of arXiv papers suggests a massive surge in AI-detected writing, reaching up to 65% in computer science by 2026, though detectors often struggle with false positives on older, human-authored texts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48981207&quot; title=&quot;I scored the full text of 12,750 arXiv papers from 2021 through 2026 to find out how many of these get flagged as machine written and how much it increased since the release of chatGPT. I purposely tuned the detector to avoid false positives. My detection rate pre chatGPT is around .4% for that reason. The biggest results: in Jan of 2026 about 39% of papers got flagged as AI written. In computer science speicifcally the peak was at 65%. Mathematics barely moved away from 0.7%, though the proof…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48982644&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not sure what to think... I uploaded a PyHPC workshop paper I wrote in 2011 and it said 27% machine. I also uploaded my PhD dissertation from 2012 and got back 40% machine, which is just barely below the 42% threshold. I don&amp;#39;t publish anymore... but does this mean I wrote like a LLM or did LLMs learn from me? :p Update: I also uploaded a IEEE CLUSTERS paper I wrote in 2015 and it came back 74% machine written :|&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48983059&quot; title=&quot;When &amp;#39;detectors&amp;#39; first started popping up all over the place, all of them rated the declaration of independence as 100% AI written, so... Yeah, these things just don&amp;#39;t work. And what&amp;#39;s even more dangerous is that people that don&amp;#39;t understand how any of it works use these tools, and accuse people of using AI, sometimes with grave consequences. Students have been through this, at all levels of education.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that AI-assisted polishing improves accessibility for non-native speakers and research communication &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48981538&quot; title=&quot;The important question is: So what? Genuinely. I get that there may be some visceral reaction against this, but when I break it down, I mostly fail to see the problem.  Seems like what is actually important is: Compared to before, when a human reads it, do they -- or society -- get something good out of it? Is it worth it to add this to the &amp;#39;pantheon?&amp;#39; If that&amp;#39;s not what&amp;#39;s happening enough, and if this doesn&amp;#39;t describe the process -- then the problem lies elsewhere, no?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48981633&quot; title=&quot;Surprisingly I agree with you. My opinion is: if it makes communicating research more effective, while not reducing the quality of the output substantially, I see no issue. A possible conclusion for this could be: If the majority of CS papers is AI written, let&amp;#39;s just accept this reality universally and stop worrying about it altogether.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48982121&quot; title=&quot;I am not a native English speaker. This is not surprising to me. I think most of the papers we write would be flagged by AI detectors. It is not because we ask LLM to write us a paper about X. It is because we are bad at writing in a scientific style, and american editors expect us to do it. With LLMs, we can write in basic sentences and tell the LLM the idea and it converts that to nice writing. If you write each paragraph and have an LLM make that paragraph more scientific, it is entirely…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48982951&quot; title=&quot;I run most professional statements and articles through LLMs before submission. This helps correct grammar and improves accessibility through better syntax (because I write exactly how I think). The article doesn&amp;#39;t seem to mention consideration of AI for polishing human work.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others warn that it creates a &amp;#34;fire hose&amp;#34; of superficially superior but structurally questionable content &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48983066&quot; title=&quot;There some real game theory mechanics at play when it comes to LLM usage in corporations. Devs are cranking out superficially superior code and documentation by just aiming the Claude Code fire hose at everything they can. Leadership encourages this because from what they can tell, there is no downside. It&amp;#39;s hard to say if this code is structurally better or worse than before, but it&amp;#39;s certainly voluminous and as far as leadership could ever tell, with their flawed metrics, that is all that…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics emphasize that LLMs break traditional quality signals, leading to &amp;#34;bad science&amp;#34; characterized by hallucinated citations and a volume of &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; that overwhelms the peer-review process &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48981914&quot; title=&quot;I recently desk-rejected a paper where every single citation in its Introduction was hallucinated. That means that the entire connection between what the author(s) did and how it relates to existing research was simply made up. I&amp;#39;ve never seen this happening before AI but now there&amp;#39;s at least one paper in every cycle pulling something similar. My problem therefore is: we are seeing more and more papers written with tools that are known to make up facts, citations, and even entire papers. And…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48981785&quot; title=&quot;Even if you can reject the aesthetic argument for non-fiction works (although read some of Dijkstra&amp;#39;s papers for a good counterargument), it is still a problem because it breaks an important quality signalling mechanism. Pre-LLMs, a paper with no spelling or grammar errors showed that somebody had put effort into writing and editing it. If they cared about the presentation, they probably also cared about the content. LLMs routinely produce nonsense that looks superficially like high-quality…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blaizzy.github.io/nativ/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Nativ: Run frontier open models locally on your Mac&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blaizzy.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48982681&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;237 points · 82 comments · by aratahikaru5&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nativ is a free, open-source application for Apple Silicon that allows users to run frontier AI models locally on their Mac without subscriptions, accounts, or cloud data transfers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blaizzy.github.io/nativ/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Nativ — Local AI for your Mac    URL Source: https://blaizzy.github.io/nativ/    Published Time: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:39:41 GMT    Markdown Content:  Latest release · 100% open source · live now    ## Run AI models    locally on your _Mac._    Nativ puts frontier intelligence on your desk. Download and run open models on Apple Silicon — no accounts, no subscriptions, no cloud.    Universal · Apple Silicon (M1+)    ![Image 1](https://blaizzy.github.io/nativ/assets/app-icon.png)**Nativ, running on…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nativ is a new MIT-licensed Mac app for local LLMs developed by the creator of the MLX-VLM library, which is noted for providing faster inference on Apple hardware than llama.cpp &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48984710&quot; title=&quot;To clarify, this MIT-licensed app is from the very same dev, &amp;#39;Prince Canuma&amp;#39;, who maintains the popular MLX-VLM library ( https://github.com/Blaizzy/mlx-vlm ).  MLX-VLM is a long-time dependency of the excellent LM Studio and others because it can provide faster inference on Apple devices than llama.cpp.  Historically, MLX is a smaller community than CUDA, but has some of the fastest updates upon the release of new models, particularly in models with modalities beyond text-in, text-out (vision,…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users question the use of the term &amp;#34;frontier&amp;#34; for local models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48983733&quot; title=&quot;Is „frontier“ overused? I thought frontier models were the best-of-the-best such as Fable right now. I assume you can’t host these models yourself since you would need many GB of RAM and expensive GPU of is my thinking of „frontier models“ wrong?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48984160&quot; title=&quot;The frontier is a curve. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_front&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that the &amp;#34;small local model frontier&amp;#34; is the most exciting area of AI research, highlighting the impressive capabilities of models like Gemma and Qwen on consumer hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48985943&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know that I agree with this specific use of frontier because it is confusable as you say. But (off on a tangent) I do think that there are multiple frontiers generally — and I also think the open weights, small local model frontier is by far the most important and exciting one. I keep mucking about with what Gemma 4 12B can do and every time I do I find myself thinking that all the energies in the AI world are going in entirely the wrong direction, because it is small, clever, efficient…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. However, the project faces criticism for its &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; marketing copy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48983839&quot; title=&quot;Advice: remove all slop and fluff from the website such as &amp;#39;Everything you need.  Nothing you don’t.&amp;#39; Just state the information you want to communicate in the plainest and most straightforward way possible.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48984242&quot; title=&quot;You’d be surprised how hard this actually is. I spent 3 days iterating on a marketing site, where I had very explicit / “well written” copy, and it would just repeatedly rewrite it back to the most awful slop. Over and over again! Ended up adding various AGENTS rules telling it to leave the copy alone&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt; and for failing to clearly differentiate itself from established competitors like LM Studio and Open WebUI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48984004&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m surprised that their home page basically acts as if LM Studio and others don&amp;#39;t already do this. It&amp;#39;s not clear what the difference is from a glance. It also omits Open WebUI. I&amp;#39;ve been running Deepseek V4 Flash locally on my Macbook Pro for weeks using Open WebUI + DS4.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, users remain divided on the practical utility of local models for &amp;#34;real work&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48985396&quot; title=&quot;Genuinely curious: what are people using these smaller local models for? They are getting decently capable, but they are still small enough that I don&amp;#39;t trust them for &amp;#39;real&amp;#39; work outside of a handful of fun toy projects. Are people actually using them in coding agents? Or are they mostly using them for other things?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; and report mixed performance results on MacBooks with lower RAM &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48984604&quot; title=&quot;Has anyone found a model that can run on a normal macbook? I have an M3 Pro with 18GB of memory and whenever I try to run even a basic model the fans goes off and the mac starts to get heated up and becomes so laggy.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48986100&quot; title=&quot;I’ve got a 32 gig m1 MacBook Pro. how would I go about trying Gemma like you mentioned? Would it run at an acceptable speed, and what could I do? Coding?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://var0.xyz/posts/perfection-is-not-over-engineering.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Perfection is not over-engineering&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (var0.xyz)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48979120&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;223 points · 94 comments · by var0xyz&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that over-engineering is the result of solving for the wrong requirements, whereas true perfection is achieved by defining strict, accurate constraints that lead to the single most effective solution for a specific problem. &lt;a href=&quot;https://var0.xyz/posts/perfection-is-not-over-engineering.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Perfection is not over-engineering — var0.xyz    URL Source: https://var0.xyz/posts/perfection-is-not-over-engineering.html    Published Time: Sun, 19 Jul 2026 19:57:34 GMT    Markdown Content:  2026-07-19  &amp;#39;We don&amp;#39;t want to do perfect.&amp;#39; &amp;#39;We don&amp;#39;t want to build the perfect solution.&amp;#39; I&amp;#39;ve heard versions of that line more times than I can count, delivered as if &amp;#39;perfect&amp;#39; were a dirty word. And I understand the caution — over-engineering burns teams, and people have learned to treat anything that…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a sharp divide over whether &amp;#34;perfectionism&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;sloppy shipping&amp;#34; is the greater threat to software quality, with some arguing the phrase &amp;#34;perfect is the enemy of good&amp;#34; is frequently weaponized to justify unmaintainable spaghetti code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48979585&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m all for pushing back against &amp;#39;let&amp;#39;s not make perfect the enemy of good.&amp;#39; I hear that all the time in reference to software that is usually quite bad, and often a little evil to boot--nothing good anywhere in sight except some poor schmuck trying to find a way to make their job something worth taking pride in. I&amp;#39;m not sure I agree that systems are products though.  The product mindset is toxic.  It means that you&amp;#39;ve got goals which are independent of the user&amp;#39;s goals (typically to make…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48983879&quot; title=&quot;The number of times I&amp;#39;ve heard that phrase used to justify shipping absolute crap utterly dwarfs the times it&amp;#39;s been used to prevent over-engineering something that&amp;#39;s already in a good state. In a thirty year career of software engineering, I haven&amp;#39;t once come across one of these mythical perfectionists that everyone is constantly retelling cautionary tales of, who endlessly rewrites perfectly serviceable software and never releases it. I have , however, worked at multiple companies that have…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48981752&quot; title=&quot;Let&amp;#39;s not make fixing bugs and backwards compatibility the enemy of shoveling out more features&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some engineers contend that over-engineering stems from solving non-existent problems like premature microservice scaling &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48979412&quot; title=&quot;I wouldn&amp;#39;t say that &amp;#39;over-engineering means solving the wrong problem&amp;#39;. It&amp;#39;s possible that the idea is basically correct, but people are directing effort towards optimizing for constraints that don&amp;#39;t really exist or can be dealt with once a better picture is in place, whether it&amp;#39;s the mythical PMF or just &amp;#39;we now understand what the users want, let&amp;#39;s build that&amp;#39;. The worst clusterfuck I&amp;#39;ve ever worked on was a web application that was actually solving a real problem fairly well, but the team…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48979651&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; but the team was spending time building an absurd Rube-Goldberg contraption of microservices This is literally the example that I use, the most common case of over-engineering, having more microservices than team members. Microservices are the right solution for certain problems, but those were not problems they had. Some anecdotal evidence. I worked in many of these places, and the most common tell of over-engineering is that when you ask &amp;#39;what problem were we solving when we decided to have…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others maintain that perfectionists exist primarily in the shadows, endlessly rewriting side projects to avoid the &amp;#34;judgment day&amp;#34; of a public launch &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48984337&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I haven&amp;#39;t once come across one of these mythical perfectionists that everyone is constantly retelling cautionary tales of, who endlessly rewrites perfectly serviceable software and never releases Oh, I have. A LOT! In my friend group theres at least 5 of these right now. They work day jobs (that they dislike), they try to build a side hustle but never get it off the ground because they endlessly rewrite perfectly serviceable software and never release, the reason is: - they believe that…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, commenters distinguish between over-complication (adding unnecessary features) and over-engineering (exceeding requirements in unhelpful ways), while debating if a &amp;#34;product mindset&amp;#34; inherently creates a toxic conflict between user needs and shareholder profit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48979585&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m all for pushing back against &amp;#39;let&amp;#39;s not make perfect the enemy of good.&amp;#39; I hear that all the time in reference to software that is usually quite bad, and often a little evil to boot--nothing good anywhere in sight except some poor schmuck trying to find a way to make their job something worth taking pride in. I&amp;#39;m not sure I agree that systems are products though.  The product mindset is toxic.  It means that you&amp;#39;ve got goals which are independent of the user&amp;#39;s goals (typically to make…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48980853&quot; title=&quot;I think over-complicated and over-engineered are not the same thing. Over-complicated is adding too many features, too much mechanism, too many moving parts. Over-engineering is far exceeding the requirements in an unhelpful way. For example: build me a treehouse. Said treehouse could probably be made of wood. If you made it out of concrete and steel, it might be a heck of a lot stronger and last a heck of a lot longer, without being more complicated (just more expensive). Too strong is…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48980025&quot; title=&quot;I get what you mean about the conflict of interest for consumer software, but I don’t think a product mindset is inherently toxic.  It’s more a function of where you are in the enshittification cycle.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.phoronix.com/news/Firefox-153-Downloads&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Firefox 153 available with support for Vulkan video decoding, JPEG-XL&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (phoronix.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48978835&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;253 points · 57 comments · by DemiGuru&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mozilla has released Firefox 153, a new Extended Support Release (ESR) that introduces Vulkan Video decoding support for cross-platform hardware acceleration. The update also features experimental JPEG-XL support, PDF enhancements, and HDR video playback for Windows users. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.phoronix.com/news/Firefox-153-Downloads&quot; title=&quot;Title: Firefox 153 Available With Support For Vulkan Video Decoding, Experimental JPEG-XL    URL Source: https://www.phoronix.com/news/Firefox-153-Downloads    Markdown Content:  [![Image 4: Phoronix](https://www.phoronix.com/phxcms7-css/phoronix.png)](https://www.phoronix.com/)    [](https://www.phoronix.com/rss.php)[](https://x.com/Phoronix)[](https://www.facebook.com/Phoronix)    *   [Articles &amp;amp; Reviews](https://www.phoronix.com/reviews)  *   [News Archive](https://www.phoronix.com/news)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users generally welcome Vulkan video decoding as a potential solution to Firefox&amp;#39;s historically inconsistent hardware acceleration on Linux &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48980555&quot; title=&quot;Cool, have been using vulkan video decoding via mpv for a while now and it seems fine with little or no performance hits. Glad it&amp;#39;s made its way here as getting hardware decoding to actually work in ff has felt like a house of cards (more options are welcome). Does something need to be done to enable/switch to it?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48981127&quot; title=&quot;Yes, while the Chrome/Chromium hardware decoding, or any other uses of the GPU, like WebGL, was always impeccable on Linux, with Firefox that was always an adventure, much more often not working than working (at least with an NVIDIA GPU). So I also hope that Vulkan decoding might solve this behavior of Firefox on Linux.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While hardware decoding is essential for high-resolution 8K content, some users have observed that software decoding or using an iGPU can actually be more power-efficient than engaging a high-power discrete GPU &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48979573&quot; title=&quot;Interesting - will see if I can toy with it. Word of caution though. I’ve found that on my machine (Linux/nvidia) unaccelerated video is way more power efficient. The second video is playing it kept the GPU in a high power state and that uses incrementally more power than the cpu doing software decoding I had always assumed gpu would obviously be more efficient until I measured it&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48979617&quot; title=&quot;All modern CPUs come with an iGPU, so it&amp;#39;s unlikely to be software decoding. Just iGPU driver&amp;#39;s decoder being more efficient than dGPU one.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48983322&quot; title=&quot;8K decoding needs HW acceleration, unless having 8-16 cores with AVX-512.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also touched on the complexity of browser hardware support, noting that Chromium maintains a massive blacklist of unsupported hardware to ensure stability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48981270&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Yes, while the Chrome/Chromium hardware decoding, or any other uses of the GPU, like WebGL, was always impeccable on Linux Have you seen the massive blacklist Chromium maintains?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48981591&quot; title=&quot;Blacklist of what? I don&amp;#39;t understand what a blacklist would be used for in this context. Specific unsupported hardware?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48981771&quot; title=&quot;Yes.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-07-19</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-07-19</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968606&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: I replaced a $120k bowling center system with $1,600 in ESP32s&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968606&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1969 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 206 comments · by section33&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An SRE developed an open-source bowling management system using ESP32 microcontrollers and Raspberry Pis, replacing a proprietary $120,000 setup with off-the-shelf hardware costing only $1,600. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968606&quot; title=&quot;I might be the only SRE on Earth with his own bowling center. It&amp;amp;#x27;s a more in-depth gig than you&amp;amp;#x27;d think.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;My family and I bought an abandoned 8-lane bowling center in the rural mid-west. In our small town there weren&amp;amp;#x27;t many recreation options for families. You&amp;amp;#x27;ve heard of a food desert? This is an R&amp;amp;amp;R desert.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;It had been abandoned for a good reason. The roof leaks, the electrical system was constantly surging, and my 70-year-old bowling equipment (still) doesn&amp;amp;#x27;t…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The project demonstrates how low-cost embedded technologies like the ESP32 can modernize aging, expensive industrial systems, such as 70-year-old mechanical pinsetters &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968835&quot; title=&quot;Right now I&amp;#39;m working on adding LED + DMX DJ light control - I kinda want to be able to order LED strips to &amp;#39;chase&amp;#39; a ball as it goes down the lane or back up the return. I plan on triggering laser-light shows and such with the DMX controller. Eventually, I want to allow a customer walk up to the lane, tap to pay and start bowling immediately, too. Kiosk-ize bowling alleys, yknow? I&amp;#39;m pumped. So much room for activities!&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48971269&quot; title=&quot;Thank you for posting this, it reaffirms what I&amp;#39;ve been thinking for so long. There are many opportunities to retrofit old systems of all types with modern low-cost embedded technologies. Around 2019 or so I was approached by an engineer who had a small business retrofitting very old machine tools with modern motion controls. Think very large lathes and planers. The problem they had was that in order to get these systems working with newer controls, they had to make time-consuming modifications…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970927&quot; title=&quot;In the US tethered pins with cords aren&amp;#39;t really a thing, instead most bowling alleys use mechanical pinsetter machines. These machines are large, complex, and expensive (see here for a video on how they work: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iod6uwUGM2E ) which is why he&amp;#39;s talking about the equipment being 70+ years old- with the revenues most bowling alleys make, it&amp;#39;s not economical to replace a pinsetter instead of maintaining the current one. This also means that the alley needs to have a…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users discussed the logistical hurdles of &amp;#34;kiosk-izing&amp;#34; alleys, such as managing shoe rentals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970578&quot; title=&quot;How are you handling bowling shoe rental?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970981&quot; title=&quot;Isn&amp;#39;t that included in the lane price? Always has been for me.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others noted a trend toward allowing street shoes for casual play &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970856&quot; title=&quot;Nowhere near the OP (UK) but I&amp;#39;ve noticed a lot of fun-only lanes arent bothering to rent shoes and just let you wear whatever you have.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48971263&quot; title=&quot;Never understood the need to wear extremely uncomfortable and ill-fitting shoes just to throw a ball. Always seemed like a way to jack the price up. Sure, professional bowlers use specialised shoes. Professional footballers and professional runners and cyclists and golfers and tennis players and skateboarders and ... do as well. But if you do any one of these activities at a low enough frequency and/or level that you&amp;#39;re not buying your own specialised shoes, whatever sneakers you have will do…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion highlights a broader opportunity for retrofitting legacy hardware, with participants sharing similar experiences using Arduinos to revive vintage mini-bowling lanes or converting analog signals for old machine tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970593&quot; title=&quot;Lol, nice! It depends on what you mean by &amp;#39;owning a bowling center,&amp;#39; but it looks like there are at least two of us into this :D I bought a really old fully mechanical (and automated!) mini bowling lane. It works without a CPU, except for the score display, which originally used a 1970 Intel D8749H (MCS-48)! Just like yours, the only thing that turns this machine on is a single relay :D  On my model, I also get feedback on the pin status and a &amp;#39;ball received&amp;#39; signal, so I can trigger the…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48971269&quot; title=&quot;Thank you for posting this, it reaffirms what I&amp;#39;ve been thinking for so long. There are many opportunities to retrofit old systems of all types with modern low-cost embedded technologies. Around 2019 or so I was approached by an engineer who had a small business retrofitting very old machine tools with modern motion controls. Think very large lathes and planers. The problem they had was that in order to get these systems working with newer controls, they had to make time-consuming modifications…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970750&quot; title=&quot;Back when I was in school I interned at a company installing bowling lanes / machines. Even back then it was fairly simple technology, no cameras or speed measurement yet, just some inputs from the machine as to what pin-cords had been pulled out (i.e. what pins fell down) translated to some simple animations. I remember the screens being just a simple VIA motherboard running DOS + their software from a compact flash card. Sounds like a great project to work on given how cheap both hard- and…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/Alibaba_Qwen/status/2078759124914098291&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Qwen 3.8&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48966120&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;840 points · 579 comments · by nh43215rgb&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alibaba has released pricing details for its Qwen token plans, accessible through the Qwen Cloud platform. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/Alibaba_Qwen/status/2078759124914098291&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.qwencloud.com&amp;amp;#x2F;pricing&amp;amp;#x2F;token-plan&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.qwencloud.com&amp;amp;#x2F;pricing&amp;amp;#x2F;token-plan&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The announcement of the 2.4T parameter Qwen 3.8 is seen by some as a direct competitive response to Moonshot AI’s Kimi K3, suggesting a race to dominate the open-weights landscape &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48966211&quot; title=&quot;I assume that this announcement has been prompted by that of Moonshot AI, which has just announced a 2.8T parameter open-weights LLM, Kimi K3, to be published on Huggingface by 27 July. Now the response of Alibaba is that they will also publish soon a big open weights LLM, the 2.4T parameter Qwen 3.8. I wonder if Alibaba has always planned to make this big LLM open weights, or they have chosen to do this now, to better compete with Moonshot AI. In any case, from this competition in LLMs, we win.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Commentators disagree on the motivation behind these releases: some argue it is a strategic &amp;#34;soft-power play&amp;#34; to commoditize intelligence and undermine American labs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48966255&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s hard to say what their motivation is. The Chinese firms seem to be working hard to commoditize intelligence which may be the most effective way to debase American frontier labs. And yeah: it also happens to be really good for humanity.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969160&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s hard to say what their motivation is. Feels pretty easy to me. They want to turn LLMs into a commodity, and watch the US AI labs crash and burn. There will still be plenty of customers who will pay them to host the models and run inference, even if the weights are open and others can offer competing products. (If necessary, the Chinese government can ban use of foreign inference services by Chinese citizens and businesses to give their own companies a domestic monopoly.) When their…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48966522&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; How does this explain open weights? They could easily take the same closed route like their American friends Because they are playing the Americans at their own game. What is the first thing an American company would do ? Spread the old American classic FUD ... &amp;#39;you can&amp;#39;t used this closed tool because its run by the communists&amp;#39;, right ? So you release it as open weights which is a win-win.  Global adoption of the model and you get to give the American AI companies a kick in the nuts because…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, while others suggest it may simply stem from an open-source philosophy or the necessity of providing accessible alternatives in a region where US APIs are blocked &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969287&quot; title=&quot;I feel like there could also be a simpler explanation. Why does a debian contributor make debian free, why do they work on this thing anyone can use? Is it because linux and debian hate windows and iOS and want to see american fail? No, it&amp;#39;s because most debian contributors believe software source code, information, should be free, users should be free to modify the code they use, and that they&amp;#39;re building a thing they want to share with the world. Maybe the chinese AI labs believe AI is…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48966356&quot; title=&quot;In China, you can’t officially use US APIs. The world saw a taste of this with Fable, but in China, this has been the situation all along. So it’s not a surprise why open weights are so cherished. As frontier models continue to block everyday individuals from securing their own codebase, I expect the adoption and usage of open weights to continue. As an example, HuggingFace recently was investigating a security incident and got locked out of frontier closed APIs. Yes, HuggingFace.…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48966429&quot; title=&quot;How does this explain open weights? They could easily take the same closed route like their American friends&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. User experiences with the Qwen series vary significantly, with reports ranging from &amp;#34;totally unusable&amp;#34; for software engineering compared to DeepSeek &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48966879&quot; title=&quot;in my experience of 1 month daily use, Qwen 3.7 Pro is just unusable. wastes too much time, goes off track, useless stuck loops, cannot debug at all. Deepseek V4 Pro is night-and-day compare to Qwen. actually Qwen models seems the worst SWE experience so far. and it is super expensive compare to Deepseek. cannot delegate anything to it, cannot use it real-time low-level tasks either. totally unusable.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt; to praise for surpassing Claude Opus in speed and comprehension &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48966953&quot; title=&quot;From my experience Qwen-3.7-Max is above the Opus level but delivers results much faster. Slightly worse then Fable. Way ahead of Deepseek 4 Pro (in speed and overall comprehension) - which is a workhorse on its own. I am using them all with Claude Code mostly. Qwen-3.7-Plus is quite OK, good for subagent use. Way better then Sonnet. Qwen-3.8-Max-Preview seems working just fine for me at the moment - I am playing with is right now but too early to say anything. At 10% of regular price it is a…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jul/19/claude-code-in-bun-in-rust/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Claude Code uses Bun written in Rust now&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (simonwillison.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48966569&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;464 points · &lt;strong&gt;619 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by tosh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Claude Code version 2.1.181 and later now utilize a Rust-based port of the Bun runtime, resulting in a 10% faster startup on Linux while maintaining seamless performance across millions of devices. &lt;a href=&quot;https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jul/19/claude-code-in-bun-in-rust/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Claude Code uses Bun written in Rust now    URL Source: https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jul/19/claude-code-in-bun-in-rust/    Published Time: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 03:36:31 GMT    Markdown Content:  19th July 2026    In [Rewriting Bun in Rust](https://bun.com/blog/bun-in-rust) Jarred Sumner made the following claim:    &amp;gt; Claude Code v2.1.181 (released June 17th) and later use the Rust port of Bun. Startup got 10% faster on Linux but otherwise, barely anyone noticed. Boring is good.    I decided to have a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The transition of Bun from Zig to Rust has sparked debate over the necessity of using JavaScript and terminal-based React for a TUI, with some critics arguing that a native rewrite would be more efficient and less resource-intensive &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968728&quot; title=&quot;Maybe I’m taking crazy pills, but I’m still stuck on “why the hell does a TUI need to run in terminal React by way of JavaScript” The fact that Anthropic felt the need to buy a runtime so they could make their TUI better speaks more to the quality of engineering than anything else IMO. If rewrites are so easy, why not rewrite CC in a native language? Would’ve been a hell of a lot cheaper.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968973&quot; title=&quot;I never knew that running an interactive program in my terminal would absolutely rinse my CPU and battery but that&amp;#39;s what Claude, OpenCode and Ghostty have colluded to achieve. Even when the laptop is asleep overnight it&amp;#39;s practically melting. I&amp;#39;m sure there was some logical reason for shoehorning web technology into this stack given that we have a good 40 years or so of experience with interactive terminal programs that use curses/ncurses, alongside emacs, vim, almost the entirety of MS-DOS,…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view the move as a pragmatic business decision that leverages deterministic compiler guardrails to reduce memory bugs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969144&quot; title=&quot;It largely works and it&amp;#39;s a massive business success. This is the classic engineer asking the &amp;#39;why this technology?&amp;#39; to what amounts to a business question. They chose it early on, it works, and it makes obscene amounts of revenue. End of story. That doesn&amp;#39;t mean it was the &amp;#39;greatest&amp;#39; choice, or has a perfect technical architecture. Rewrites are never easy, even the bun rewrite. But a non-UI developer tool with a rigid API surface contract (and associated tests) will always be easier to trust…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970377&quot; title=&quot;Drilling into the original article where Jarred explained the reasoning behind the change, It&amp;#39;s pretty clear that under zig the team was doing things by hand that are automatic in rust. Humans and agents share one thing: they are both non-deterministic. He talks about the issue of tracking memory lifecycles manually in zig so it can be explicitly freed. As expected, this leads to a long list of bugs where people missed things. Rust does this automatically. It removes an entire class of errors…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others express concern over the lack of transparency regarding the unreleased Bun version used by Claude &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48966727&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; For me this outputs Bun v1.4.0 (macOS arm64). The most recent release of Bun on GitHub is currently v1.3.14 from May 12th, so that v1.4.0 version number in Claude supports them shipping a preview of a not-yet-released Bun version. And so, the FOSS project &amp;#39;Bun&amp;#39; silently dies in darkness and is now something completely else. I&amp;#39;m glad I still had &amp;#39;Investigate if Bun is worth it&amp;#39; on my TODO list and hadn&amp;#39;t yet gotten to it. What is the governance structure for Bun by the way? Couldn&amp;#39;t find any…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48966841&quot; title=&quot;The objection isn’t to the language. It’s to Claude using a version of Bun that is not available to us. We don’t know what’s actually in it.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Supporters of the change emphasize that the rewrite, reportedly completed in 11 days using AI agents, has not negatively impacted performance and represents a successful application of the technology &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48966845&quot; title=&quot;It’s made absolutely no negative difference, as we’ve seen in the real world in the last 60 days since the merge. I feel weird having to defend reality; reality being that it was merged nearly 2 months ago and tons of people have had their pitchforks out without a shred of actual evidence that this made bun worse in any measurable way. But they still insist it was a mistake. I’ve never met Jared or the bun team but I don’t understand all the personal attacks, I just feel the need to correct the…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970014&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; But the whole point of their product is that it supposedly nullifies such &amp;#39;business&amp;#39; concerns around the use of technology, by making it cheap and fast to build whatever you like automatically. This is a spectrum, it&amp;#39;s not just 0% vs 100%. Even Fable frakked up a few things really badly in my professional work (though to its credit after a very detailed 2h chat it self-corrected and fixed all the blunders). I would also challenge &amp;#39;fast&amp;#39; -- Fable (and I assume Mythos) are wicked fast and…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://workshop.cjpais.com/projects/transcribe-cpp&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Transcribe.cpp&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (workshop.cjpais.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963879&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;733 points · 156 comments · by sebjones&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Transcribe.cpp is a new ggml-based C++ library that provides fast, numerically validated, and hardware-accelerated local transcription for over 60 AI models across Windows, Linux, and macOS. &lt;a href=&quot;https://workshop.cjpais.com/projects/transcribe-cpp&quot; title=&quot;Title: Project - transcribe.cpp    URL Source: https://workshop.cjpais.com/projects/transcribe-cpp    Markdown Content:  I&amp;#39;m super excited to share [transcribe.cpp](https://github.com/handy-computer/transcribe.cpp) today.    transcribe.cpp is a ggml based transcription library which supports all the latest transcription models. Every model published under the [handy-computer](https://huggingface.co/handy-computer) HF org has been numerically validated and WER tested to match the reference…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users express a strong desire for low-latency, continuous speech-to-text that types at the cursor in real-time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48965151&quot; title=&quot;For anyone looking to build on top of this. I have tried a few different STT systems, and they accurately capture what I am saying. Unfortunately, they don&amp;#39;t support the reasonable workflow I want to open an office document, for example, and start talking. And I want the software to continuously type what I am saying at the cursor with minimal latency. The continuous part is crucial. Many software will paste whatever I said after I have stopped recording, but that is not useful.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, though some note that English often requires surrounding context to resolve homophones correctly &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48965363&quot; title=&quot;You know English doesn&amp;#39;t work like that. The word you&amp;#39;re saying only becomes clear with the surrounding context. Eg, &amp;#39;there&amp;#39; vs &amp;#39;their&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. To address this, commenters suggest a &amp;#34;streaming&amp;#34; approach where text is inserted immediately and then retroactively corrected as the model gains more context &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48965397&quot; title=&quot;It may be interesting to have it immediately insert the words, even if they are wrong, and when a sentence is finished, replace what has been written with the final corrected sentence.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48965512&quot; title=&quot;But this is still possible to do if you track the whole run of text. You could replace all of it each time so it LOOKS like it’s streaming but earlier words also change. I’m hoping the streaming models do this eventually. I believe the built-in iOS dictation already does this.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, there is significant interest in specialized features such as speaker separation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48964514&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s the easiest way to add speaker separation to this?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48964675&quot; title=&quot;Hey! It’s actually in progress right now, probably will come this week :)&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt; and a phonetic IPA transcription mode to assist linguists researching minority languages &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48966212&quot; title=&quot;Looks very cool. One thing I have been looking for, which this doesn&amp;#39;t seem to cover (at least I didn&amp;#39;t see any mention of IPA in the model documentation), is a way to transcribe unknown languages phonetically, using the International Phonetic Alphabet to spell them (sound-based spelling rather than meaning-based spelling). I know several linguists doing research on minority languages (fewer than 10,000 speakers in some cases), which are small enough that they will never have enough effort made…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://chipweinberger.com/articles/20260719-hardware-is-not-so-hard&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What I learned selling 2,500 MIDI recorders: Hardware is not so hard&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (chipweinberger.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48966713&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;458 points · 208 comments · by chipweinberger&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After selling 2,500 Jamcorder MIDI recorders, creator Chip Weinberger reflects on how hardware development proved significantly easier than writing the product&amp;#39;s 200,000 lines of software, suggesting that hardware&amp;#39;s reputation for difficulty is overstated when designs are kept simple and margins remain high. &lt;a href=&quot;https://chipweinberger.com/articles/20260719-hardware-is-not-so-hard&quot; title=&quot;Title: Hardware is not so hard    URL Source: https://chipweinberger.com/articles/20260719-hardware-is-not-so-hard    Markdown Content:  ## What I learned selling 2500 MIDI recorders, part 1: Hardware is not so hard    July 19, 2026  A [year and a half ago](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42082430), I launched [Jamcorder](https://jamcorder.com/).    ![Image 1: A Jamcorder connected to a piano](https://chipweinberger.com/assets/20260719-hardware-is-not-so-hard/jamcorder-in-situ.png)    A Jamcorder, in…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the author argues hardware is manageable, commenters contend his experience is an outlier facilitated by using pre-certified modules like the ESP32, which bypasses complex regulatory testing and antenna design &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970190&quot; title=&quot;Hardware has a reputation for being hard for three reasons. First, it scales differently than software. It&amp;#39;s far harder to design something you want to make a million of than something you want to make ten of. Second, it&amp;#39;s harder to anticipate, test, and correct all the things that can go wrong on the user end. Some people will put batteries the wrong way, some will drop the device on the ground, some will connect it to some vintage equipment you have never seen in your life, etc. And third,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970975&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; &amp;#39;actual regulations...emissions&amp;#39; yeah, and looking at their board I see they use one of &amp;#39;ESP32-WROOM&amp;#39; modules, which has the wifi &amp;amp; blutooth &amp;amp; antennae (pre-certified by Espressif for FCC, CE so itself doesn&amp;#39;t need testing) &amp;amp; flash &amp;amp; processor (which even has its own RC oscillator), which takes care of a whole ton of difficult stuff so all the designer needs to do is plop that module down and power it up and wire some SPI/I2C peripherals which I&amp;#39;m guessing don&amp;#39;t need super fast clocks or…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics emphasize that hardware remains difficult due to scaling challenges, unpredictable user behavior, and physical failure modes like component obsolescence or poor capacitor placement &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970190&quot; title=&quot;Hardware has a reputation for being hard for three reasons. First, it scales differently than software. It&amp;#39;s far harder to design something you want to make a million of than something you want to make ten of. Second, it&amp;#39;s harder to anticipate, test, and correct all the things that can go wrong on the user end. Some people will put batteries the wrong way, some will drop the device on the ground, some will connect it to some vintage equipment you have never seen in your life, etc. And third,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical discussions also focused on the project&amp;#39;s 200,000 lines of code and the implementation of anti-counterfeiting measures using STSAFE chips and per-device IDs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48967493&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m using an STSAFE chip - the same IC they use in StarLink terminals. Essentially the digital equivalent of a holographic barcode. I have some other protections too. e.g. Random 128-bit per-device IDs / product-keys. iMessage uses this strategy. Maybe I&amp;#39;ll write an article about that.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48967554&quot; title=&quot;Almost all commercial devices need a unique ID, private key, etc burned in on the production line. For a big enough production run, you&amp;#39;d likely ship an HSM to the factory&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48967082&quot; title=&quot;The number that stuck out was 200K lines of code.  Can you expand on why so much code had to be written and which parts were the longest (time and/or code) and hardest bits?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, some users noted a growing interest in physical engineering as a way to reclaim the &amp;#34;fun&amp;#34; of building things that they feel LLMs have removed from software development &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48967790&quot; title=&quot;Wow, congrats, I remember reading your HN post. I hope you will continue writing blog posts on your journey, I expect quite a lot of software engineers would be very interested going though a similar journey now that LLMs removed most of the fun of programming. It’s neat to work on something physical for a change&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48967825&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; now that LLMs removed most of the fun of programming Never understood this, was the &amp;#39;most of the fun of programming&amp;#39; the literal typing for you? For me it was about solving problems and building things, and I get to do that more now than before, and without all the literal typing.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ludic.mataroa.blog/blog/ai-mania-is-eviscerating-global-decision-making/#fnref:3&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI Mania Is Eviscerating Global Decision-Making&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ludic.mataroa.blog)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48964185&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;395 points · 246 comments · by subset&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Corporate leaders are succumbing to a &amp;#34;mass psychosis&amp;#34; by mandating AI adoption despite widespread project failures, creating a culture of fear where employees must feign belief in the technology&amp;#39;s transformative power to maintain their jobs and secure funding. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ludic.mataroa.blog/blog/ai-mania-is-eviscerating-global-decision-making/#fnref:3&quot; title=&quot;Title: AI Mania Is Eviscerating Global Decision-Making — Ludicity    URL Source: https://ludic.mataroa.blog/blog/ai-mania-is-eviscerating-global-decision-making/    Markdown Content:  Note: This has been cross-posted to my company&amp;#39;s blog, in case you think there is some use in sharing with someone in a format that looks more authoritative. Link [here](https://hermit-tech.com/blog/ai-mania-is-eviscerating-global-decisionmaking).    &amp;gt; I strongly believe there are entire companies right now under heavy…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether current AI represents a revolutionary technological leap or a massive hype bubble built on &amp;#34;snake oil&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48967027&quot; title=&quot;Most of us on some level felt confident that AI would completely revolutionise our society. The singularity made sense to me, at least. It hasn&amp;#39;t worked out like that, but rather than accept the crushing reality of our mistake and take a second to re-evaluate, we&amp;#39;ve decided to LARP out the future we promised ourselves by crowbar-and-vaselineing AI into every crack and crevice we can find and loudly proclaiming progress. It&amp;#39;s like some 90s kid with a Nintendo power glove who&amp;#39;s convinced…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48967328&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Most of us on some level felt confident that AI would completely revolutionise our society. Seriously? Maybe I’m just getting old, but having lived through the dot-com hype in the 1990s, the XML hype in the 2000s, and the cloud hype in the 2010s, this has been an utterly predictable hype cycle around AI. This does not mean that AI is completely useless. It will impact the world but not in the ways the snake oil salesmen are claiming. This is very similar to the internet. The best bubbles are…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that agentic AI is already a game-changer for complex tasks like coding and system administration &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968472&quot; title=&quot;I just don&amp;#39;t understand how someone could think we&amp;#39;re going back to a pre-LLM world.  Have you not used one since Opus 4.5 came out? Especially as somebody that&amp;#39;s no longer in the software profession and so doesn&amp;#39;t have 40 hours a week to just sit there and crank out code, agentic AI is a technological leap on the level of search engines, bulletin boards or compilers. You can literally just open Claude Code, say: - &amp;#39;Add these domains with these mailboxes to an SMTP server running on my homelab,…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that these tools often produce flawed results that only appear successful to less competent users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969870&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; - &amp;#39;Add these domains with these mailboxes to an SMTP server running on my homelab, forward all incoming and outgoing via mxroute&amp;#39; I laughed reading this. Have you actually tried it? I recently tried to get Claude (Opus) to give me a setup for a simple SMTP relay with Postfix. I had to constantly fight it not to include completely unnecessary components and configurations like Dovecot or just override my requirements. Even Claude is nothing but a semi-competent tutorial clicker. To someone who…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics also point out that claims of a 100% failure rate for AI projects likely stem from extreme selection bias, as companies with successful implementations do not seek out &amp;#34;anti-modern&amp;#34; consultants specializing in project recovery &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48964860&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; All of the AI projects we have observed as a team are failing. Every single one – we have seen 0% success in a year and a half, not only amongst projects we have been asked to participate in, but even within projects that we have observed in passing while doing totally unrelated work. That&amp;#39;s got to be hyperbole, which blows out their credibility. They chose to say &amp;#39;AI&amp;#39; rather than, for example, LLM, or Transformer model, or Diffusion model. This means they are including a huge swathe of…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48964956&quot; title=&quot;If you read the footnote, they follow up to say they&amp;#39;ve rejected 100% of the AI projects brought to them. Go to their home page and one of their consulting selling points is recovering struggling projects. One of their front-page selling points is that they use &amp;#39;ancient techniques&amp;#39; from books written prior to the year 2000, because presumably everything newer than that is bad? &amp;gt; For non-executive management who might be struggling to deliver things that feel beyond their control, we have…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48965160&quot; title=&quot;Companies with projects that are doing well don&amp;#39;t try to hire consultants who specialized in saving failing projects. No company with a good AI strategy is going to go to the Hermit Tech website where text written in Ye Olde Font explains that they&amp;#39;ll use ancient techniques from the 80s and 90s to make your software work and thinks, &amp;#39;These are the right people for our AI job!&amp;#39; These people are trying to carve out a niche for themselves as being anti-modern, anti-AI, and being contrarian…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://thenextweb.com/news/ai-advice-suppresses-critical-thinking-wrong-answers-study&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI advice made people less accurate but more confident – sudy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (thenextweb.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48971738&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;325 points · 183 comments · by rbanffy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A study found that using AI advice caused participants&amp;#39; accuracy to drop from 27% to 9% while their confidence more than doubled, suggesting that the technology suppresses critical thinking and the ability to recognize the limits of one&amp;#39;s own knowledge. &lt;a href=&quot;https://thenextweb.com/news/ai-advice-suppresses-critical-thinking-wrong-answers-study&quot; title=&quot;Title: AI advice made people three times less accurate but twice as confident, researchers found    URL Source: https://thenextweb.com/news/ai-advice-suppresses-critical-thinking-wrong-answers-study    Published Time: 2026-07-19T15:35:47+00:00    Markdown Content:  #### TL;DR    _Researchers found AI advice suppressed judgment suspension from 44% to 3%, accuracy from 27% to 9%, while confidence rose from 30% to 76%. People trusted wrong AI answers._    [Researchers from three French and Italian…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Critics argue the study is fundamentally flawed because it tested participants using an AI intentionally hobbled with incorrect information, a setup they claim is akin to providing a faulty textbook rather than evaluating AI-specific traits like sycophancy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48972275&quot; title=&quot;This study is pretty bad. The comment ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970182 ) on the other link with the direct PDF explains the problem well, which is that nothing here being tested is specific to AI systems. This study gave people access to an LLM that the researchers knew would give incorrect answers to certain questions, and then quizzed people on those questions, with the option to not respond to a given question if they are unsure about the answer. This is akin to giving someone…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48972663&quot; title=&quot;Agreed, the headline says &amp;#39;AI advice made people three times less accurate&amp;#39;. But if we really want to know how accurate these people were, we need to know how accurate the AI system they use is. If the AI system is hobbled to a point where it is worse than they reasonably expect we can&amp;#39;t blame the people or the AI system. This would be the same as claiming the listening to experts make people less accurate in a study that told experts to lie. A better headline would read, &amp;#39;Very inaccurate AI…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others contend the study accurately reflects real-world behavior, noting that people increasingly use LLMs to feign expertise on platforms like Reddit or to reinforce their own biases in &amp;#34;echo chambers&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48972168&quot; title=&quot;Advice and information subreddits have gone to shit because of AI usage. A large number of people seem to think that when someone asks a question, what they really want is not someone with direct knowledge, but instead someone to relay the question to ChatGPT and post the result as if it is their own hard earned knowledge and insight. I have no idea about the quality of this research but in the real world (well, real-ish, as real as Reddit can be) it is stark, people aren’t just refusing to say…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48972139&quot; title=&quot;AI pessimist view. Even if AI gets smarter it will still be agreeable, and people will use it to more confidently reinforce thier stupider ideas, especially in areas where they lack the knowledge to know if they are right. Even if this can be solved, technically, people won&amp;#39;t want to use the model that says they are wrong, so they will choose the glib lies that reinforce their beliefs. Freedown of speech forces people to think they may be wrong, but freedom of association lets people avoid…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48972299&quot; title=&quot;You could make the point that it’s no different than the textbook example you gave, but people don’t generally use textbooks like that, while out in the world people do use LLMs like that all the time.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. This shift has sparked social friction, with some users refusing to read AI-generated responses while others defend the practice as a legitimate way to provide help &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48972316&quot; title=&quot;responding &amp;#39;if you can&amp;#39;t be bothered to write it, I can&amp;#39;t be bothered to read it&amp;#39; really sets people off. they get very mad and ive had some even use ai to tell me why that&amp;#39;s wrong. what differentiates you? you could tell me &amp;#39;type xyz into chatgpt&amp;#39; or even share a structured document link from their site. but when you&amp;#39;re copy/pasting, then you&amp;#39;re basically useless in the equation.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48972625&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; responding &amp;#39;if you can&amp;#39;t be bothered to write it, I can&amp;#39;t be bothered to read it&amp;#39; really sets people off That’s crazy, it seems like such an obviously fair policy to me. They rarely even read their own generated text. I don’t understand this mentality&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48972817&quot; title=&quot;Another human being took time from their life to try and help you It wasn&amp;#39;t as much time as you felt entitled to from them, so you responded by minimizing their contribution and  being condescending. That upset them. The problem here was not the other person.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/33972/files&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OpenAI reduces Codex Model Context Size from 372k to 272k&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48965850&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;337 points · 157 comments · by AmazingTurtle&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI has issued a backport for Codex model metadata that updates the bundled GPT-5.6 model instructions and context-window specifications. The update also refreshes reasoning summaries, skills, and permissions for stable 0.144 clients. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/33972/files&quot; title=&quot;Backport refreshed bundled model metadata to 0.144 by sayan-oai · Pull Request #33972 · openai/codex    Summary Backport d26a9bf671b1c03aabfc32e1092d137c1feb3962 to the 0.144 release line. Refresh bundled GPT-5.6 model instructions and context-window metadata. Refresh reasoning-summary, skills, perm...        &amp;lt;!DOCTYPE html&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;html    lang=&amp;#39;en&amp;#39;      class=&amp;#39;skip-scroll-target-into-view js-skip-scroll-target-into-view&amp;#39;      data-color-mode=&amp;#39;auto&amp;#39; data-light-theme=&amp;#39;light&amp;#39; data-dark-theme=&amp;#39;dark&amp;#39;   …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are largely critical of the context reduction and the aggressive &amp;#34;auto-compaction&amp;#34; feature, which frequently triggers when 10–20% of the window remains &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48967776&quot; title=&quot;I know a lot of people like to say that compaction makes this moot, but the level of detail you lose across compaction is wildly too much for most things that I do, unfortunately. Perhaps if your plans don&amp;#39;t have as much detail, or if you&amp;#39;re not, for example, having a discussion with a lot of nitty-gritty then it&amp;#39;s fine? The lack of long context is the main reason that I still end up using Anthropic. The worst is when you need it to hold for example a number of papers in its head, or large and…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969402&quot; title=&quot;The fact there is no way to disable auto-compaction and no way to go back in the conversation history to before a compact makes codex a no-go for me on any codebase &amp;gt; 5kloc. Even worse it seems to fire randomly at 10-20% of context left. So really you have 80% of 272k as real usable context. Compaction kills my sessions, it hallucinates and is worse than starting fresh. I&amp;#39;ve had enough times screaming at my computer when it burns tokens on a large codebase, gets to 15%, auto-compacts, and…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. This process is described as destructive to complex workflows, often leading to hallucinations or the loss of &amp;#34;nitty-gritty&amp;#34; details required for analyzing multiple research papers or large codebases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48967776&quot; title=&quot;I know a lot of people like to say that compaction makes this moot, but the level of detail you lose across compaction is wildly too much for most things that I do, unfortunately. Perhaps if your plans don&amp;#39;t have as much detail, or if you&amp;#39;re not, for example, having a discussion with a lot of nitty-gritty then it&amp;#39;s fine? The lack of long context is the main reason that I still end up using Anthropic. The worst is when you need it to hold for example a number of papers in its head, or large and…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969402&quot; title=&quot;The fact there is no way to disable auto-compaction and no way to go back in the conversation history to before a compact makes codex a no-go for me on any codebase &amp;gt; 5kloc. Even worse it seems to fire randomly at 10-20% of context left. So really you have 80% of 272k as real usable context. Compaction kills my sessions, it hallucinates and is worse than starting fresh. I&amp;#39;ve had enough times screaming at my computer when it burns tokens on a large codebase, gets to 15%, auto-compacts, and…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48967681&quot; title=&quot;Not a fan of their context compaction and I feel like 1M-token context should minimum today. Each day I see how GPT 5.5 and 5.6 struggle a bit after each compaction before they get to the full speed, sometimes focusing too much on some older steering message that made it into the compacted context.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users suggest alternative context management strategies or manual planning to mitigate these issues &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969601&quot; title=&quot;Maybe instead of screaming at your computer come up with a better context management strategy?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48967899&quot; title=&quot;I agree. Compaction sucks, so I made tools that let the LLM selectively delete (and recall if needed) chunks of its context. You might want to try context bonsai if you&amp;#39;re routinely hitting the auto-compaction wall. https://github.com/Vibecodelicious/context-bonsai-agents&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968128&quot; title=&quot;That seems quite different from my design process. I write a plan.md that goes through multiple revisions. The plan is the memory. Restarting and reading the plan again to do another review is a good way to get a different perspective.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others report that the degradation in performance has led them to migrate to competitors like Anthropic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48967776&quot; title=&quot;I know a lot of people like to say that compaction makes this moot, but the level of detail you lose across compaction is wildly too much for most things that I do, unfortunately. Perhaps if your plans don&amp;#39;t have as much detail, or if you&amp;#39;re not, for example, having a discussion with a lot of nitty-gritty then it&amp;#39;s fine? The lack of long context is the main reason that I still end up using Anthropic. The worst is when you need it to hold for example a number of papers in its head, or large and…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970651&quot; title=&quot;I did find a strategy, thank you very much, and it was easy: npm uninstall -g @openai/codex &amp;amp;&amp;amp; curl -fsSL https://claude.ai/install.sh | bash This was the final straw that got me to downgrade my OpenAI subscription and move the bulk of my spending to Anthropic and Claude code. OpenAI devs, if you&amp;#39;re reading, this is how you lost a customer.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, a minority of users find the context limits non-problematic, noting that the model appears to function as if it has no limit at all &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48967190&quot; title=&quot;I never felt that context size was any issue at all in codex. I don&amp;#39;t know how their compaction works, but it just keeps on going as if it has no context limit at all. At least in my experience.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.minecraft.net/en-us/article/minecraft-26-3-snapshot-4&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Minecraft: Java Edition now uses SDL3&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (minecraft.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48967256&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;293 points · 196 comments · by ObviouslyFlamer&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Minecraft: Java Edition snapshot 26.3 Snapshot 4 replaces the GLFW library with SDL3 for window and input management, introduces native Wayland support for Linux, and adds new item components for custom furnace fuels alongside numerous technical changes and bug fixes. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.minecraft.net/en-us/article/minecraft-26-3-snapshot-4&quot; title=&quot;Title: Minecraft 26.3 Snapshot 4    URL Source: https://www.minecraft.net/en-us/article/minecraft-26-3-snapshot-4    Published Time: 2026-07-16T14:30:00.000+0000    Markdown Content:  Happy Snapshot Tues... Thursday? Yes, you read that right! As we&amp;#39;ve entered peak vacation season here in Sweden, snapshots might not come out on their usual schedule.    In today&amp;#39;s snapshot we have switched the library used for window management, input and platform integration from GLFW to SDL3.    We have also added new…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The transition from GLFW to SDL3 in Minecraft: Java Edition has sparked technical debate regarding SDL&amp;#39;s broader feature set, such as integrated audio and networking, versus GLFW&amp;#39;s more focused windowing and input capabilities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968220&quot; title=&quot;Is the rationale for switching away from GLFW documented anywhere? I&amp;#39;d love to read about it, I have some projects which use GLFW myself and I&amp;#39;m always wondering whether or not SDL would be better&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968250&quot; title=&quot;SDL is more of a &amp;#39;platform&amp;#39; you can use anywhere.  It includes literally everything you&amp;#39;d want from the OS layer (windowing, graphics, audio, input, network code, threads) whereas GLFW is just windowing, graphics context and input, you need to bring your own audio, network code and threading library.  Not a big deal for some but SDL does do more... Plus it&amp;#39;s even more portable than GLFW.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968289&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m aware of those things, but are those the reasons ? Are they actually planning on moving away from their existing audio, networking and threading solutions and switch it out for SDL&amp;#39;s implementations? Are they planning on porting Minecraft Java to platforms GLFW doesn&amp;#39;t support?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users express concern over bugs in exclusive fullscreen mode on Windows and Wayland &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48967868&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Known Issues &amp;gt; Exclusive fullscreen mode on Windows may cause the game to crash in certain situations, especially when using multiple monitors &amp;gt; Entering Exclusive fullscreen mode crashes the game on Wayland Those, together, kinda seem like the kind of blocking bug that would usually delay a snapshot... Lets hoping it gets fixed before release lands...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others note that exclusive fullscreen is being deprecated across many platforms in favor of borderless modes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968016&quot; title=&quot;Pretty sure minecraft has used borderless full screen for a long time unless you go out of your way to tell it not to. Lots of platforms, services, and applications have been deprecating exclusive full screen over the past decade or so.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968108&quot; title=&quot;in this same release Minecraft removed exclusive fullscreen on MacOS, i wonder why they haven&amp;#39;t done the same on Windows &amp;amp; Linux - maybe people still have uses for that stuff on those operating systems? in my experience exclusive fullscreen is Awful on MacOS&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. For parents managing the &amp;#34;incompatibility nightmare&amp;#34; between Java and Bedrock editions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48971833&quot; title=&quot;Apologies for hijacking an advice thread, but I&amp;#39;m another dad who&amp;#39;s had to deal with this incompatibility nightmare, and I really really want to know what the hell happened within Microsoft &amp;amp; Mojang to end up with this mess. No, seriously, I&amp;#39;m fascinated by the story. It&amp;#39;s been over ten years . I&amp;#39;m happy to assume that most of the people involved are smart and good with decent intentions. I also bet there were many kinds of commercial and organisational pressures, especially because it&amp;#39;s (a)…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, experts recommend using Geyser for cross-platform play &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968354&quot; title=&quot;Minecraft comes in two flavors, Java and Bedrock. All of the mobile, console ports, and windows store versions are based on bedrock. Java is the one you download directly from the website. Bedrock isn&amp;#39;t really about custom hosted servers, but there is a way. You can run a standard Java Minecraft server however you like, and then you can wrap it to also work with the Bedrock using Gyser[1] which will protocol translate it on the fly. It can require some workarounds on the more restrictive…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt; and sticking to modern JVMs with ZGC for simplified server performance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968830&quot; title=&quot;My main advice, ignore all advice online about JVM tuning minecraft.  It&amp;#39;s dated and often just wrong. The best thing you can do is run on the latest JVM, set your max memory as high as you can tolerate, and use ZGC.  That&amp;#39;s it. The JVM tuning guides for minecraft will have you switching and toggling every JVM flag under the sun with extremely dubious &amp;#39;evidence&amp;#39; of the payout for the flags they switch.  In some cases, they will set contradictory flags.  For example, setting eden size and target…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/stupside/castor&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Better and Cheaper Than IPTV&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48964015&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;328 points · 103 comments · by xonery&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Castor is an open-source tool that extracts video streams from web pages or URLs, transcodes them in real time, and casts the content with optional auto-generated subtitles to DLNA-compatible smart TVs and Chromecasts directly from a terminal. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/stupside/castor&quot; title=&quot;GitHub - stupside/castor: Point it at any web page and it finds the video, extracts the stream, transcodes it and casts in real time to your TV. It even burns subtitles….    Point it at any web page and it finds the video, extracts the stream, transcodes it and casts in real time to your TV. It even burns subtitles…. - stupside/castor    [Skip to content](#start-of-content)    ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [Sign in](/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fstupside%2Fcastor)    Appearance…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on two different approaches to streaming: a CLI tool that scrapes and transcodes movie streams for TV playback &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48964264&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a CLI that lets you select a movie, finds a matching stream from streaming websites, transcodes it, burns in subtitles in real time, and tells your TV to play it.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48967403&quot; title=&quot;Claude helped me out for sure, i&amp;#39;m not a DLNA or FFMPEG beast, but i solved a problem I had and that&amp;#39;s what matters. If it solved a problem you have, even better.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, and &amp;#34;TV Explorer,&amp;#34; a browser-based interface for over 10,000 free, public HLS streams &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48964960&quot; title=&quot;For a no hacks alternative, I built TV Explorer. It puts the channel&amp;#39;s published HLS stream into your browser with no interim steps. Uses the public GitHub list of more than 10,000 free channels. https://tvexplorer.live&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Users praised TV Explorer for its exceptional speed and responsiveness, likening it to the instant channel-switching of analog NTSC television &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48965084&quot; title=&quot;That is an unbelievably slick thing that you&amp;#39;ve got there. It feels very light-weight, it&amp;#39;s approximately instantly-responsive.  Back button works.  I don&amp;#39;t understand the stats (or my contribution to them), but whatever. (the closed-captioning pop-up causes some overlay issues for me, though) moar edit:  Upon further review with my very not-special desktop box, I&amp;#39;m reasonably confident that this is the quickest, most-responsive &amp;#39;TV-watching&amp;#39; experience I&amp;#39;ve had since analog NTSC left the scene…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some participants questioned the legality and ethics of the CLI tool&amp;#39;s piracy-adjacent features &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48964227&quot; title=&quot;Seems to be missing some context. What is this used for? Piracy?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48964528&quot; title=&quot;Usually piracy software tries to maintain a little plausible deniability, but here this is suggesting it will help you stream this weekend&amp;#39;s newly released $250m blockbuster.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, while others noted that many public streams are frequently geoblocked or offline &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969490&quot; title=&quot;Looks potentially very nice but the majority of the channels I tried were &amp;#39;blocked in my area or not broadcasting&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969515&quot; title=&quot;Thanks for the feedback and I&amp;#39;m sorry that happened. Because the data comes from a public GitHub list of channels, the app has no way to know what will be geoblocked for you (or not) or actually online at the moment (or not) until you try to tune it -- very much like an old analog TV. But... TV Explorer does keep track of what&amp;#39;s tunable (with status lights down the left column) and also lets you scan in the background to find the ones that are live for you right now.…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/kimi_moonshot/status/2078855608565207130&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Moonshot AI suspends new subscriptions due to Kimi K3 demand&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969291&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;247 points · 103 comments · by serialx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moonshot AI has temporarily paused new subscriptions for its Kimi K3 model due to overwhelming demand and compute capacity limits, while announcing plans to split future memberships into separate general and coding tiers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/kimi_moonshot/status/2078855608565207130&quot; title=&quot;Title: Kimi K3 has received far more love than we expected, and our GPUs are feeling it.    Over the past 48 hours, demand has pushed close to the limits of our current capacity. To protect the experience of existing subscribers, we&amp;#39;re temporarily pausing new subscriptions and    URL Source: https://twitter.com/kimi_moonshot/status/2078855608565207130    Published Time: 2026-07-19T14:52:55.000Z    Markdown Content:  [](https://twitter.com/)    ## Post    [Log…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moonshot AI’s decision to pause new subscriptions to protect the experience of current members has been praised as a rare example of prioritizing customer satisfaction over rapid growth &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970885&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Over the past 48 hours, demand has pushed close to the limits of our current capacity. To protect the experience of existing subscribers, we&amp;#39;re temporarily pausing new subscriptions and prioritizing compute for current members. Existing subscribed users are not affected. Such a beautiful paragraph to read, a company that prioritizes their current customers and focus on keeping them satisfied instead of just focusing on fast growth.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48971030&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; a company that prioritizes their current customers and focus on keeping them satisfied instead of just focusing on fast growth. I always hated how the &amp;#39;Login&amp;#39; button is smaller on every website than the &amp;#39;Sign Up&amp;#39; button.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some users report poor experiences with the K3 model, noting that long processing times—up to 12 minutes without feedback—can result in immediate quota exhaustion &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970723&quot; title=&quot;Personal anecdote: I exhausted my Claude usage yesterday so I decided to spend 20$ to try Kimi while I was at it. Logged in, paid, downloaded Kimi Code, set it to use K3 and prompted something along the lines of: &amp;#39;Check this repository and find all the settings that can be passed as input related to hardware, I/O, thread control or networking. Produce a report&amp;#39;. It thought for about 12 minutes and then told me I had exhausted my daily quota. (The next day Fable did the same task in 3m) If you…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48971860&quot; title=&quot;So I am likely coming from a completely different world because I use entirely self hosted models - but is it really common in your workflows to just wait for 12 minutes without any feedback? I am constantly watching my model and following the path it’s taking and cutting it off or steering it if it’s headed down a dead path. I was just curious if this is really common to just have no feedback for 12 minutes?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While the model&amp;#39;s architecture is technically lauded for its innovative use of RNN and linear attention layers for long-context tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970441&quot; title=&quot;I think the Kimi thing is super cool, especially that they have so many RNN/linear attention layers (3x more than they have full attention). I haven&amp;#39;t yet tried it though. It seems like it would be extremely reasonable for long context tasks and I guess this fits the times. I suspect that the reason it has so many parameters is the same reason that compute optimal xLSTMs have some many parameters, and the success of this model makes me a bit unhappy that we haven&amp;#39;t gotten an xLSTM-style model…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, there are concerns that only giants like OpenAI and Anthropic have the infrastructure to handle the massive demand required for reliable enterprise use &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970424&quot; title=&quot;I wonder if anthropic and openai will remain relevant simply due to the fact that they&amp;#39;re the only ones that are able to handle this much demand for the forseeable future? My bet would be that companies would probably not be too happy with employee time being wasted on outages and other related issues when it already costs so much.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.andros.dev/blog/0b8e451e/i-joined-the-indieweb-heres-what-i-learned/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I joined the IndieWeb, here&amp;#39;s what I learned&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (en.andros.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48966984&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;182 points · 92 comments · by andros&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The IndieWeb is a community-driven movement promoting personal data ownership through independent websites and open protocols like Webmention and microformats. By prioritizing &amp;#34;Publish on your Own Site, Syndicate Elsewhere&amp;#34; (POSSE), creators maintain canonical control of their content while remaining connected to social platforms and the Fediverse. &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.andros.dev/blog/0b8e451e/i-joined-the-indieweb-heres-what-i-learned/&quot; title=&quot;Title: I joined the IndieWeb, here&amp;#39;s what I learned | Andros Fenollosa    URL Source: https://en.andros.dev/blog/0b8e451e/i-joined-the-indieweb-heres-what-i-learned/    Markdown Content:  Driven by curiosity, I decided to find out what the _IndieWeb_ tag that kept showing up on some blogs and Mastodon toots was all about. I quickly discovered it was more than an empty concept or a feeling of nostalgia for the web of the 90s. It was a movement with concrete ideas, protocols and an active community!…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Critics argue that the IndieWeb remains a &amp;#34;NerdNet&amp;#34; inaccessible to most users because it prioritizes complex engineering and manual configuration over user-friendly, one-click solutions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968882&quot; title=&quot;If IndieWeb wants content, burying it under a ton of tech soup is the exact opposite of what they claim they want. How do the developers not realise that this set of protocols is completely unworkable for 90% of users? Please stop developing systems where the engineering is front and centre. If you want to put content UX first, you need to do exactly that, with a one-click solution that gets users up and running instantly. If you users have to go anywhere near a command line, or Docker, or they…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969715&quot; title=&quot;Indieweb is sometimes tied to self-hosting to give people configurabilty and flexibilty. It does keep indieweb for the few and not the many.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view the movement as a way to manage hosting rather than strictly self-host, others feel the aesthetic has become overly professionalized and corporate, losing its &amp;#34;anarchic&amp;#34; roots &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969802&quot; title=&quot;Rather than self-hosting, IndieWeb advocate for managing hosting; like GitHub Pages or similar.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970246&quot; title=&quot;I feel some uneasiness when I go to a website branded as &amp;#39;indieweb,&amp;#39; and see a link to the author&amp;#39;s CV prominently on the page. Sometimes you also see a professional taken headshot of the author or an enthusiastic description of his work history at prestigious institutions. And it&amp;#39;s always a professionally made blog. You know the drill. It feels like walking into a brightly lit clothing store in a fancy mall and seeing the anarchy symbol on all items. Look closer and you&amp;#39;ll see an almost four…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant debate also exists regarding the necessity of RSS feeds; some consider them essential infrastructure, while others question their modern relevance and utility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48967895&quot; title=&quot;Although not explicitly part of the indieweb protocols, RSS and Atom feeds are important too.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969265&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;re not just &amp;#39;important&amp;#39;, a blog without RSS/Atom feed is like a car without wheels.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969907&quot; title=&quot;I’ve never had an rss on any blog/site I’ve ever hosted and never felt like I’m missing anything What is the advantage to me of maintaining an rss? Is there some giant rss feed following community I’m missing?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://quesma.com/blog/custom-deep-research-pipeline/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I burned all my tokens researching how to save tokens&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (quesma.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48967355&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;116 points · &lt;strong&gt;153 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by bkotrys&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To optimize costs and accuracy, a researcher developed a multi-model pipeline that orchestrates various AI subscriptions as subagents, extending research time tenfold and reducing hallucinations through a tiered &amp;#34;find, verify, and judge&amp;#34; workflow that only utilizes expensive deep-research tools for final synthesis. &lt;a href=&quot;https://quesma.com/blog/custom-deep-research-pipeline/&quot; title=&quot;Title: I burned all my tokens researching how to save tokens    URL Source: https://quesma.com/blog/custom-deep-research-pipeline/    Published Time: 2026-07-17T00:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  On the [Hacker News front page](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48967355) on 19 Jul 2026    At Quesma we are researching the economics of AI agents: what agentic coding really costs and what you can do about it. For this research I am running my own deep research setup, a pipeline of agents that builds a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide between skeptics who view the cloud AI ecosystem as a self-referential cycle of &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; and efficiency blog posts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968174&quot; title=&quot;It sometimes feels to me that cloud AI providers have convinced people that cloud AI is worth it because of all the ways people have been able to use cloud AI to write blog posts about using cloud AI to make cloud AI more efficient for something that they haven&amp;#39;t shipped yet and aren&amp;#39;t really ready to talk about.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968599&quot; title=&quot;One sentence into that readme I can tell you that yes, it most definitely counts as slop.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, and developers who claim to be shipping functional products but often avoid publicizing them due to hostile feedback &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968310&quot; title=&quot;Trust me there are plenty of us using cloud AI to actually ship stuff. We just aren&amp;#39;t writing blog posts about it.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968481&quot; title=&quot;Whenever I&amp;#39;ve answered this question, the reply was always &amp;#39;this is shit&amp;#39;, so I don&amp;#39;t bother now. Bad faith questions just shouldn&amp;#39;t be answered.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. To optimize costs, users suggest a tiered approach: utilizing local models for 90% of tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968351&quot; title=&quot;I am not a proper developer and only use AI for faster research of topics so please forgive my ignorance.  Could one not save a lot of money on tokens by using the 80/20 or 90/10 rule in that 90% of AI usage is on local models and save that last 10% or less for the frontier models where the local model did not meet the needs?  Did they cover this and I misunderstood?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt; or funneling research from cheap, diverse models into high-power frontier models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968053&quot; title=&quot;Simply starting in the right part of the search space is the biggest predictor of success. The best way to save tokens is to start out the deep research pass with cheap models and then funnel the findings through increasingly powerful models. I&amp;#39;ve got a pipeline right now that uses all 3 of the gpt-5.6 model variants to address each stage of the process. If you are using models like sol or terra to generate hypotheticals and perform initial exploration, you are leaving money on the table. 5…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, adopting batch pricing can reduce costs by 50%, provided users are willing to trade immediate responses for high-quality, delayed results &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968053&quot; title=&quot;Simply starting in the right part of the search space is the biggest predictor of success. The best way to save tokens is to start out the deep research pass with cheap models and then funnel the findings through increasingly powerful models. I&amp;#39;ve got a pipeline right now that uses all 3 of the gpt-5.6 model variants to address each stage of the process. If you are using models like sol or terra to generate hypotheticals and perform initial exploration, you are leaving money on the table. 5…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg8edqq5g5o&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bananas sprout in Rayleigh Garden UK after 15 years&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968063&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;146 points · 105 comments · by teleforce&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After 15 years of waiting, an Essex couple successfully grew fruit on their banana plants, a phenomenon experts attribute to increasingly warm summers and milder winters in the UK. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg8edqq5g5o&quot; title=&quot;Title: Bananas sprout in Rayleigh garden after 15 years    URL Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg8edqq5g5o    Published Time: 2026-07-19T05:38:48.663Z    Markdown Content:  ## Bananas in bloom - warm weather impact on gardens    23 hours ago    Henry Godfrey-Evans Essex    ![Image 1: Supplied A woman with glasses and a hat posing next to a bunch of bananas](https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/480/cpsprodpb/fc8b/live/16395500-8132-11f1-b525-63787292c170.jpg.webp)Supplied    Emma (pictured) and Peter Stav…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The emergence of fruiting bananas in the UK is attributed by some to recent heatwaves and the &amp;#34;urban heat island effect,&amp;#34; where stone and steel infrastructure in densifying cities absorbs and radiates significant heat &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969041&quot; title=&quot;With these heatwaves, many cities in France, Italy and England are at times *hotter* than cities in the tropical SEA! No wonder the bananas are starting to fruit.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969500&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; He added that growing banana plants in the UK is not new for a &amp;#39;geek in the plant world&amp;#39;, but perhaps still niche to the average person. Also, do you think that it may have something to do with being cities with stone and steel that absorbs and radiates heat, and that cities are no longer as filled with trees due to urbanization and immigration filling them with people? For context, London, Rome, and Paris have respectively gone from 2.6M, 175K, 1.05M populations to 14.5M, 4.3M, and 12.4M; so…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. This sparked a debate over the accuracy of climate data, with claims that many UK weather stations are poorly sited near runways or in obstructed gardens, leading to &amp;#34;corrupted&amp;#34; record-breaking readings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970061&quot; title=&quot;Because you never looked. What he&amp;#39;s saying is a true and well known problem in climatology. Population increases create an appearance of warming in the dataset. There are two sources of corruption. The first is the urban heat island effect. Many weather stations are corrupted because although they were once in fields or other natural sites, over time cities expanded to meet the needs of the growing population and ended up building around the stations. This distorts readings by pushing up the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970404&quot; title=&quot;The Lingwood site is class 5 because it&amp;#39;s in some guy&amp;#39;s garden and surrounded by trees/hedges that block airflow. Class 5 sites have +/- 5 degrees of uncertainty and shouldn&amp;#39;t be used for climatology under any circumstances. As to the runway point you&amp;#39;re being sarcastic about - yes, that can happen. The UK set a record temperature in July 2022, which the BBC reports was set at Coningsby in Lincolnshire: https://www.bbc.com/weather/articles/crm04vm30x9o In fact it was set at RAF Coningsby at the…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others argue these technical critiques overlook broader environmental trends, such as record-breaking mean temperatures and significant lack of rainfall &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970145&quot; title=&quot;Yes, I&amp;#39;m sure the reason the UK had its hottest mean June temperature ever and recorded its highest ever June temperature in the village of Lingwood, Norfolk   is all down to how many weather stations are located next to runways .&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970523&quot; title=&quot;OK, got you. Clearly everywhere that recorded record temperatures last month was either next to a runway or in heat islands (which we definitely haven&amp;#39;t had for decades) or in someone&amp;#39;s garden, whereas all the historical benchmarks exceeded were flawless. The UK recording a temperature of over 40 celsius was actually an anomaly because of the first time a jet ever landed at a British airport. Also the lack of rain was measurement error too.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While the fruit&amp;#39;s appearance is a novelty, commenters note that these specific bananas are virtually inedible and raise concerns about whether warmer climates might eventually draw tropical pests to Europe &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968397&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; He pointed out that Musa Basjoos are not really for eating. &amp;gt; He said: &amp;#39;It&amp;#39;s basically like having a mouth full of ball bearings with half a teaspoon of banana on them.&amp;#39; Maybe we can iterate on the texture some more here.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970591&quot; title=&quot;In South America there&amp;#39;s a very aggressive spider that lives on the bananas (genus Phoneutria). Spiders usually shy away from humans but these attack and have a very nasty venom.  I wonder if the heat will take nasty critters to Europe.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.phoronix.com/news/Last-MPEG-4-Patent-Expired&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Last MPEG-4 Visual Patent Has Expired&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (phoronix.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969635&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;194 points · 56 comments · by LorenDB&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The final MPEG-4 Visual patent, a Brazilian filing for image processing, expired on July 19, 2026, officially ending all patent restrictions on the MPEG-4 Part 2 standard. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.phoronix.com/news/Last-MPEG-4-Patent-Expired&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Last MPEG-4 Visual Patent Has Expired    URL Source: https://www.phoronix.com/news/Last-MPEG-4-Patent-Expired    Published Time: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 10:17:03 GMT    Markdown Content:  [![Image 3: Phoronix](https://www.phoronix.com/phxcms7-css/phoronix.png)](https://www.phoronix.com/)    [](https://www.phoronix.com/rss.php)[](https://x.com/Phoronix)[](https://www.facebook.com/Phoronix)    *   [Articles &amp;amp; Reviews](https://www.phoronix.com/reviews)  *   [News Archive](https://www.phoronix.com/news)  * …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The expiration of the final MPEG-4 Visual patent marks the end of the era for codecs like DivX and Xvid, though users note that the more ubiquitous H.264 standard remains patent-encumbered globally until approximately 2030 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970344&quot; title=&quot;Note that MPEG-4 part 2 is H.263/DivX/XviD, not H.264.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970579&quot; title=&quot;Yeah. I think h264 is coming soon, too, though. Most of the remaining known h264 patents expire next year, with only one patent extending out further. I do believe that more modern codecs like h265 and AV1 have a lot to offer us, but having h264 be fully unencumbered by patents will be nice. By modern standards it is very well-supported in both hardware and software, computationally cheap to encode and decode, and still does a good enough job for most use cases. h264 doesn&amp;#39;t seem like it will…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969986&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; While the US and EU patents around MPEG-4 Part 2 expired in recent years, until today there remained one patent still active in Brazil. Since MPEG-this Part that is hard to keep straight, this is the MPEG standard backing Xvid and DivX codecs. So let&amp;#39;s encode video and torrent like it&amp;#39;s 2002!&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While newer codecs like AV1 and H.265 offer superior compression, H.264 is expected to have an exceptionally long &amp;#34;long tail&amp;#34; due to its massive hardware support, low computational requirements, and sufficiency for most non-niche resolutions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970579&quot; title=&quot;Yeah. I think h264 is coming soon, too, though. Most of the remaining known h264 patents expire next year, with only one patent extending out further. I do believe that more modern codecs like h265 and AV1 have a lot to offer us, but having h264 be fully unencumbered by patents will be nice. By modern standards it is very well-supported in both hardware and software, computationally cheap to encode and decode, and still does a good enough job for most use cases. h264 doesn&amp;#39;t seem like it will…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48971723&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think video resolution will increase all that much in the future, except for niche uses, as the resolution of the human eye becomes a limiting factor.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970804&quot; title=&quot;I would hope so! Otherwise the Pareto front wouldn&amp;#39;t have moved in ~20 years which would be rather hard to believe. However, at the same time, h265, h266 and AV1 are all vastly more complicated, and will have less broad hardware acceleration support than h264, which, again, even if it is not optimally efficient use of compute, just doesn&amp;#39;t require a whole lot by modern standards. So I&amp;#39;d argue there is really no reason to be rushing away from h264 unless you have a compelling reason. There are…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Some commenters argue the patent system successfully enabled &amp;#34;maximum extraction&amp;#34; during the codec&amp;#39;s peak utility, while others contend this focus on economic extraction deviates from the system&amp;#39;s original purpose of promoting scientific progress &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48971460&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; At which point, the continued march towards higher resolution and bandwidth video will probably limit their utility Just as the patent system intended: maximum extraction was enabled while the product was useful.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48973045&quot; title=&quot;[the United States Congress shall have power] To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Clause The purpose of the system as it was originally conceived was not to provide maximum economic extraction -- the purpose was to promote the progress of science and useful arts. It is not necessarily the case that the maximization of…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://orionbrowser.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Orion Browser by Kagi&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (orionbrowser.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970894&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;142 points · 88 comments · by sebjones&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Orion is a privacy-focused, WebKit-based browser from Kagi that features zero telemetry, native performance, and unique support for Safari, Chrome, and Firefox extensions across macOS, iOS, and Linux. &lt;a href=&quot;https://orionbrowser.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Orion Browser by Kagi    URL Source: https://orionbrowser.com/    Markdown Content:  ## WebKit.Extensions.Privacy.![Image 1: Check icon](https://storage.googleapis.com/prod-kagi-lab-kagi-cms/headline-check.svg)Pick all three.    Orion — A web browser designed from the ground-up.    Native WebKit speed, compatibility with a wide selection of extensions, and absolute privacy — finally together in one browser that respects you.    [![Image 2: Download Orion on the App…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users highlight Orion’s ability to run Firefox extensions like uBlock Origin on iOS as a standout feature, though many report the browser currently feels unpolished and prone to UI bugs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48971596&quot; title=&quot;The best feature is being able to use Firefox extensions and thus uBlock Origin and sponsorblock on iOS. It&amp;#39;s a little buggy but worth it for me.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48973469&quot; title=&quot;I tried using Orion mobile for months but I just kept running into so many UI bugs that I had to switch away from it :(. I love Kagi, but Orion just feels unpolished right now&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate whether a WebKit-based browser can truly be considered &amp;#34;built from the ground-up,&amp;#34; others question the lack of a built-in password manager and the decision to keep the source code private &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48971450&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; WebKit. &amp;gt; A web browser designed from the ground-up. Both of these can&amp;#39;t be true. Perhaps they&amp;#39;re thinking of Ladybird?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48971674&quot; title=&quot;Where&amp;#39;s the source code for their browser?   Such move of not publishing it is almost bizarre for such a pro-privacy company.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48971657&quot; title=&quot;WebKit is a rendering engine, not a browser. It&amp;#39;s a bit like saying &amp;#39;that isn&amp;#39;t original art because you used Earth physics that govern how paint flows and dries.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48971705&quot; title=&quot;No password manager built-in yet. Although I suppose I really should migrate to Apple&amp;#39;s native password manager nowadays.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the discussion includes skepticism regarding Kagi’s long-term commitment to privacy, with some users characterizing their stance as a purely financial calculation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48971708&quot; title=&quot;Kagi is not a pro privacy company except inasmuch as they currently consider privacy to be profitable. They are a would-be AI company who discovered paid search was a viable way to self-fund. If you ask them what guarantees you have that they won&amp;#39;t someday decide to sell your search history, their response will be &amp;#39;well, it doesn&amp;#39;t make financial sense for us to do so. Now drop it&amp;#39; and ban you. Here&amp;#39;s a blog post someone wrote about this with examples: https://d-shoot.net/kagi.html&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/07/we-want-texans-know-their-rights-qa-mayday-health-impact-surveillance-abortion&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;We want Texans to know their rights&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (eff.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48972062&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;170 points · 55 comments · by amarcheschi&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nonprofit Mayday Health has launched a billboard campaign in Houston to warn Texans about the use of digital surveillance, such as license plate readers and location tracking, to monitor and investigate individuals seeking abortion care. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/07/we-want-texans-know-their-rights-qa-mayday-health-impact-surveillance-abortion&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;We Want Texans to Know Their Rights&amp;#39;: Q&amp;amp;A with Mayday Health on the Impact of Surveillance on Abortion Care    Last May, EFF reported that a sheriff’s office in Texas searched data from more than 83,000 automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras to track down a woman suspected of self-managing an abortion. ALPRs are promoted as tools for keeping communities safe by finding missing persons and locating...    [Skip to main content](#main-content)    * [About](/about)    + [Contact](/about/contact)   …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights the use of automated license plate readers to track individuals seeking abortions in Texas, sparking a debate over the morality and prioritization of law enforcement resources &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48972236&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Last May, EFF reported that a sheriff’s office in Texas searched data from more than 83,000 automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras to track down a woman suspected of self-managing an abortion.&amp;#39; These people really have nothing better to do?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48972871&quot; title=&quot;Every minute spent tracking down a lady getting an abortion is a minute not spent tracking down a murderer or a rapist or similar.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that police are simply fulfilling their duty to enforce existing laws &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48972599&quot; title=&quot;They have a law to enforce.  The law enforcement activity is as good as the law :(&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48972760&quot; title=&quot;To someone who thinks abortion is murder, that&amp;#39;s very important work.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that targeting individuals creates excessive harm and distracts from investigating violent crimes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48972871&quot; title=&quot;Every minute spent tracking down a lady getting an abortion is a minute not spent tracking down a murderer or a rapist or similar.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48972853&quot; title=&quot;As someone that does, I disagree. Laws on this subject should exclusively apply to providers, with exceptions for medical necessity. There are too many harms that come from targeting individuals to be worthwhile.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. This legal climate has led to practical safety concerns, with reports of women reverting to paper records to avoid digital surveillance via period-tracking apps &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48972247&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s no longer safe to even use a period tracking app in many US states now. The women I know are all cautioning each other to go back to pen and paper, and ditch anything app based.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sgt.hootr.club/blog/home-server-rebirth/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The death and rebirth of my home server&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sgt.hootr.club)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48966769&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;129 points · 83 comments · by steinuil&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After a power outage killed his Raspberry Pi&amp;#39;s microSD card, the author rebuilt his home server using NixOS with optimizations to minimize disk writes. The new setup features a redundant Btrfs storage pool made from old hard drives, automated subvolume management, and a &amp;#34;high endurance&amp;#34; SD card. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sgt.hootr.club/blog/home-server-rebirth/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The death and rebirth of my home server    URL Source: https://sgt.hootr.club/blog/home-server-rebirth/    Markdown Content:  A few evenings ago my partner and I were in the mood to install this particular Linux ISO. The guys from Red Letter Systems had spoken of it well, it had good reviews on boundingboxd, and my partner liked the installation trailer.    I opened [Tremotesf](https://github.com/equeim/tremotesf-android) on my phone to check whether I already had it on the Pi, but the torrent…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a consensus that SD cards are prone to failure when used as primary storage due to write-cycle limitations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48967475&quot; title=&quot;Flash memory generally doesn&amp;#39;t have great lifespan for repeated writes; using it as a root device is going to kill it pretty quickly. I had a similar problem once running a NAS off a USB stick; within a year of so the stick would no longer accept new data and I swapped it out for an SSD instead.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48967534&quot; title=&quot;Yeah but it&amp;#39;s also SD cards in particular and Raspberry Pis in particular.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, though some argue this can be mitigated by using read-only filesystems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968143&quot; title=&quot;Make the sdcard a read only root fs, problem solved&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt; or higher-quality power supplies to prevent data corruption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48971562&quot; title=&quot;I suspect most of the &amp;#39;corruption&amp;#39; RPi users experience is likely bad power (shitty undersized USB power bricks) glitching the CPU and causing the filesystem to corrupt. The SD card is likely doing exactly as it&amp;#39;s being told by the host system - write (invalid) data to blocks, which it does.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users suggest transitioning to mini-PCs for better reliability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48967377&quot; title=&quot;Raspberry Pis are notorious for SD card corruption with unknown causes. In this era you might replace it with a mini-PC (NUC style).&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others note that embedded systems can successfully run on SD cards for over a decade with proper management &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969640&quot; title=&quot;I work on embedded linux machines that go a decade plus in active use with micro sd cards, it&amp;#39;s not a problem at all&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical debate also touched on the utility of `zram`, with some questioning its logic as swap while others pointed to its benefits as a compressed RAM disk &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969749&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I chose to enable zram for swap swap is used when you run out of ram. using a ramdisk for swap ... You see how that doesnt make sense?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969784&quot; title=&quot;Zram creates a compressed RAM disk. https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Zram&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thedrive.com/news/how-texas-police-spent-4-5-million-on-four-chevy-tahoes&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Texas Police Spent $4.5M on Four Chevy Tahoes&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (thedrive.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969582&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;134 points · 59 comments · by randycupertino&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Texas Department of Public Safety spent nearly $4.5 million on four Chevrolet Tahoes equipped with FalcoNet surveillance technology, which allows police to secretly intercept cell phone data and track locations by mimicking cellular towers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thedrive.com/news/how-texas-police-spent-4-5-million-on-four-chevy-tahoes&quot; title=&quot;How Texas Police Spent $4.5 Million on Four Chevy Tahoes    It&amp;#39;s hard to make a 2026 Chevy Tahoe cost more than a million dollars. Until you start packing it with military-grade public surveillance technology.    **We have updated our [Privacy Policy](https://recurrent.io/privacy-policy/). Please review to learn more. By continuing to use our services, you agree to these updates.**    ×    [ ]    [![The Drive…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The $4.5 million expenditure by Texas police primarily funded &amp;#34;military-grade&amp;#34; surveillance technology, including FalcoNet systems and 5G tracking tools, rather than just the four Chevy Tahoes themselves &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969594&quot; title=&quot;Answer: Military Grade surveillance tech &amp;gt; Naturally, it wasn’t just $4.5 million for four 2026 Chevy Tahoes, though the SUVs themselves were still bizarrely expensive at $150,000 a piece. Here’s how the purchase order breaks down: - FalcoNet Core System (x4): $2,850,000 - Unlicensed FalcoNet core system: $200,000 - Delta 5G Perpetual license for FalcoNet V (x4): $280,000 - 2026 Chevrolet Tahoe (x4): $600,000 - FalcoNet Backpack core V2 – 6 x BTS (2G/3G/4G/5G): $355,500 - Flexable [sic] antenna…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters debated the constitutionality of such mass surveillance, with some arguing it violates Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970662&quot; title=&quot;Mass surveillance is prohibited by the Constitution. The majority of the funds went toward it.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970809&quot; title=&quot;It is prohibited by the nation&amp;#39;s Constitution which overrules all contained regions. The contained regions can add further restrictions, not lower them.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48971066&quot; title=&quot;The Supreme Court has over multiple cases recognized that the collection of mass digital information can implicate Fourth Amendment protections. Here is the foundational line: &amp;gt; &amp;#39;The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, while others questioned if the Constitution explicitly addresses modern digital surveillance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970966&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m pretty sure that surveillance is not mentioned in the US Constitution.  They didn&amp;#39;t really have a concept of surveillance.  Can you quote the line?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some noted that these tools are highly effective against criminals who carry phones &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970430&quot; title=&quot;Most criminals are dumb, some of them not only carry their phones with them, they even post their crimes on social media. With that and Flock I would think police work has never been easier.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others argued that such technology discourages traditional &amp;#34;hard&amp;#34; police work and can be easily bypassed by simply leaving a device at home &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969634&quot; title=&quot;I find it amusing how ineffective all of this stuff becomes if you simply leave your phone at home. No one is doing the hard kind of police work anymore.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ollama.com/blog/all-aboard-open-models&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ollama: All Aboard Open Models&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ollama.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48965880&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;132 points · 53 comments · by inferhaven&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ollama has raised $88 million in funding to expand its platform, which enables millions of developers to easily run, customize, and scale open-source AI models locally and in the cloud. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ollama.com/blog/all-aboard-open-models&quot; title=&quot;Title: Ollama: all aboard open models · Ollama Blog    URL Source: https://ollama.com/blog/all-aboard-open-models    Markdown Content:  ## July 9, 2026    ![Image 1: Ollama founders](https://ollama.com/public/blog/founders.jpg)    Michael and I first met in college, where we started our first company, Kitematic, which made Docker dead-simple to run. In 2015, it was acquired by Docker. There, our work became Docker Desktop, launched in 2016 and now used by over ten million developers around the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion is heavily polarized, with critics accusing Ollama of rebranding llama.cpp features as their own and failing to provide proper credit while raising significant venture capital &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968635&quot; title=&quot;- stop using ollama - https://sleepingrobots.com/dreams/stop-using-ollama/&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969738&quot; title=&quot;Taking credit for other people&amp;#39;s work while raising millions? Yeah, pretty bad and relevant.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48966710&quot; title=&quot;Will Ollama finally properly credit llama.cpp ? Or will they continue to rebrand new llama.cpp features as their own?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users recommend alternatives like Unsloth for better performance and quantization quality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968173&quot; title=&quot;This is all lovely and I wish them the best. But please don&amp;#39;t use ollama, or their quants. Not only is the app itself slower than pure llamacpp. But their quants are often no where near the best. I really hope people start with something like unsloth, as their software and quants are really much better all around.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968837&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t use local models often enough, but this convinced me to uninstall ollama. Now I need to figure out which of the options at the end of that post is the best alternative for me.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others defend the project for its ease of use and role in popularizing local AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969596&quot; title=&quot;This post is empty of any relevant content. I wish HN would stop sharing drama-seeking posts, especially by anonymous authors, attacking the hard work of people. Are ollama&amp;#39;s authors perfect? No, they are just humans. But many people find their work valuable and we should support Open Source. I can assure you that you won&amp;#39;t like the world where nobody release Open Source projects anymore because of the constant negativity.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969993&quot; title=&quot;I get that people here have reasons to hate on Ollama but it has two genuinely strong points:  - it makes it very easy to use open models with a lot of harnesses and assistants via `ollama launch`;  Their $20 subscription is very generous, and they claim not to log or train on your data. I will be curious to see if their subscription ever supports the ~3T open weights models announced this week.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also skepticism regarding the company&amp;#39;s claim that one in ten global developers uses the platform &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970512&quot; title=&quot;I think the &amp;#39;8.9 million developers use ollama&amp;#39; figure they throw around is contrived. I found this 2025 article which posits that there were 47.2 million software developers in the world. Even the number of developers has doubled in a year (plausible if you account for the rise in vibe coding), I think it&amp;#39;s very unlikely that 1 in 10 developers use ollama. https://www.slashdata.co/post/global-developer-population-tr...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-07-18</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-07-18</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://videocardz.com/newz/lg-monitors-silently-install-software-through-windows-update-without-user-consent&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LG monitors silently install software through Windows Update without consent&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (videocardz.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48956688&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1196 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 603 comments · by baranul&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LG monitors are reportedly using Windows Update to silently install an app installer that pushes McAfee subscriptions without user consent. The behavior, which also affects some Dell and Alienware displays, can be blocked by adjusting Windows Group Policy settings to prevent automatic device-associated application downloads. &lt;a href=&quot;https://videocardz.com/newz/lg-monitors-silently-install-software-through-windows-update-without-user-consent&quot; title=&quot;Title: LG monitors silently install software through Windows Update without user consent    URL Source: https://videocardz.com/newz/lg-monitors-silently-install-software-through-windows-update-without-user-consent    Published Time: 2026-07-17T13:08:01+00:00    Markdown Content:  [](https://videocardz.com/ &amp;#39;VideoCardz.com&amp;#39;)    [](https://x.com/VideoCardz &amp;#39;Our X/Twitter&amp;#39;)[](https://www.facebook.com/VideoCardz/ &amp;#39;Our Facebook&amp;#39;)    - [x]     [VideoCardz.com Home](https://videocardz.com/ &amp;#39;VideoCardz.com -…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LG&amp;#39;s silent installation of un-sandboxed software via Windows Update is viewed as a significant security risk that affects both new and older monitor models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957021&quot; title=&quot;This is so much worse that the title makes it out to be: 1. Your OS installs malware (technically manufacturers software) from a 3rd party vendor in background, zero user interaction    2. Happens as soon as you or anyone with physical access plug in a device into the HDMI port    3. That malware has internet and full system access, no sandboxing    4. It starts with every system boot    5. This software gets installed when you plug in a new LG monitor    6. OR ALREADY HAD AN OLDER LG MONITOR…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue this behavior is unprecedented in its visibility, others point out that Microsoft has facilitated similar &amp;#34;crapware&amp;#34; injections for years through vendors like Razer and various printer manufacturers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957039&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;  This situation has.. no precedent as far as I can tell.. Microsoft has been allowing this sort of ludicrous behavior for decades at this point, it&amp;#39;s not a new issue. What&amp;#39;s new is how visible LG made their malware, compared to previous auto-installs that happen like this, where they try to make the thing not so in your face, as they know there will be a huge backlash. I don&amp;#39;t know what Microsoft is thinking even allowing and enabling this sort of thing, they&amp;#39;ve lost all touch when it comes…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957719&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;This situation has.. no precedent as far as I can tell.. Printer, mouse, tablet and display tablet makers use this to insert their crapware since at least Windows Vista or Windows 7, I think. The last one I remember is plugging a Razer mouse just to watch it instantly pulling 1.5GB of bloated junk with &amp;#39;telemetry&amp;#39; exfiltrating the data from my gaming PC in realtime. At least it doesn&amp;#39;t leave my mouse in a non-working state when I disconnect the internet, like it used to. Thanks, Razer!…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957409&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;I don&amp;#39;t know what Microsoft is thinking even allowing and enabling this sort of thing This has been a feature since Windows 7, and it worked great since it would pull all necessary drivers after installation without you going hunting on the internet like in the Windows XP days. Just that no HW manufacturer thought to push spyware in their driver repos at that point to improve some team&amp;#39;s KPIs.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters largely blame Microsoft for prioritizing monetization over user experience, though technical workarounds exist to disable automatic manufacturer app downloads &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48956964&quot; title=&quot;Workaround: gpedit.msc    Computer Configuration &amp;gt; Administrative Templates &amp;gt; System &amp;gt; Device Installation    Prevent automatic download of applications associated with device metadata    Set to enabled    OK On home editions sans gpedit.msc: sysdm.cpl    Hardware tab    Click Device Installation Settings    Under &amp;#39;Do you want to automatically download manufacturers&amp;#39; apps for your devices?&amp;#39;, select &amp;#39;No&amp;#39;    Save Changes&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957671&quot; title=&quot;If you have been reading the news about Windows 11 then I will enlighten you -- they view the Windows 11 consumer business as a cost center that must be mitigated. As such, all manner of monetization has been approved and it will continued to be approved without regard for user experience. This article obviates that this is not an LG problem, it is a Microsoft problem. Also, don&amp;#39;t fool yourself if you think this won&amp;#39;t come to the Linux world.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stephen.bochinski.dev/blog/2026/07/18/the-kimi-k3-moment/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Kimi K3 Moment&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (stephen.bochinski.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48960218&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;597 points · 584 comments · by sbochins&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of China&amp;#39;s Kimi K3 model highlights a shift in AI dominance, as it matches Claude&amp;#39;s performance at a fraction of the cost while avoiding the restrictive US regulations that have hindered American frontier models. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stephen.bochinski.dev/blog/2026/07/18/the-kimi-k3-moment/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Kimi K3 Moment    URL Source: https://stephen.bochinski.dev/blog/2026/07/18/the-kimi-k3-moment/    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: The Kimi K3 Moment](https://stephen.bochinski.dev/assets/posts/2026-07-18-the-kimi-k3-moment.png)    I’ve been running [Kimi K3](https://venturebeat.com/technology/chinas-moonshot-ai-releases-kimi-k3-the-largest-open-source-model-ever-rivaling-top-u-s-systems) alongside Claude on my normal coding work, and for all practical purposes I can’t tell them apart. Same…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that the rise of Chinese models like Kimi K3 marks an inevitable &amp;#34;endgame&amp;#34; where frontier labs lose their moat to distillation, shifting the investment value from model developers to hardware companies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48961457&quot; title=&quot;Regardless of whether they achieved parity via distillation, or whether they got here via independently constructing a model from scratch, it was always going to end this way for the frontier American labs. Distillation “attacks” are not attacks. The frontier labs “distilled” all existing human written knowledge into their models, there was always going to be a second class lab that would distill that model into a cheaper version of it. There was never any plausible explanation for why this…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48961187&quot; title=&quot;This was always where this was heading, but we got here much faster than expected. Once western governments declare it to be a &amp;#39;national security&amp;#39; risk for citizens to have access to open-weight frontier models, and once they classify using these models as acts of terrorism, what will that world be like? Will using Kimi K3 come to be like how napster was in the olden days?  Everybody knew it was technically illegal, but come on -- any track at your fingertips?  But surveillance is quite more…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view distillation as a fair &amp;#34;tradeoff&amp;#34; given that American labs originally trained on unlicensed human data, others contend that Western labs have since transitioned to multi-billion dollar licensing deals that Chinese competitors likely bypass &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48961825&quot; title=&quot;Given these models could not have been trained in the first place if they had to license every line of random fan fiction on the internet, I think distillation also being fair game is a tradeoff everyone should be willing to take (unless they want to decelerate, but that&amp;#39;s a different conversation).&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48962087&quot; title=&quot;Us models didnt pay for licenses too&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48962537&quot; title=&quot;That is incorrect. Anthropic paid $1.5 billion in compensation to copyright holders for use of their content in training data. OpenAI pays hundreds of millions per year across 150+ licensing deals for access to copyrighted data. Meta and Alphabet have similar arrangements. Under the settlement, Anthropic was forced to delete the pirated data they were training on. Chinese labs can still train on pirated data. I doubt the Chinese models operate under similar licensing agreements.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48961968&quot; title=&quot;How is distillation an &amp;#39;attack&amp;#39; but gigascraping the Internet to the point of crashing servers and everyone needs Cloudflare and Anubis now not an &amp;#39;attack&amp;#39;? I&amp;#39;m not aiming for a what about kickflip here: I&amp;#39;m saying we need to either agree on some rules or stop crying foul. Maybe the coherent legal theory is that neural networks and intellectual property don&amp;#39;t interact. That would be weird but it would be consistent, a market could price it, I could do coding stuff and know if I was illegaling.…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the hype, early hands-on testing suggests Kimi K3 may currently suffer from high latency and restrictive usage limits compared to OpenAI, even if its reasoning capabilities occasionally surpass competitors like Gemini &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48961116&quot; title=&quot;I tried Kimi K3 on a task I&amp;#39;ve done with every other model I use regularly ( https://swelljoe.com/post/i-let-every-agent-implement-its-ow... ) and found it chewed a lot longer on the problem and ate up almost the entirety of a 5 hour usage limit on their $19 plan. I only have the $20 plan from OpenAI and the same task, with a lot of the same implementation details as Kimi Code, only took a few minutes and consumed almost none of the 5 hour limit. Subscription usage limits are hard to measure as…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://data.stackexchange.com/stackoverflow/query/1953768#graph&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What AI did to stackoverflow in a graph&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (data.stackexchange.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48956949&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;454 points · &lt;strong&gt;550 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by secretslol&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stack Overflow data reveals a historical record of monthly question counts from 2008 through 2011, tracking the platform&amp;#39;s early growth from just four questions at launch to over 100,000 per month. &lt;a href=&quot;https://data.stackexchange.com/stackoverflow/query/1953768#graph&quot; title=&quot;Title: Stackoverflow - Stack Exchange Data Explorer    URL Source: https://data.stackexchange.com/stackoverflow/query/1953768    Markdown Content:  **2**    ![Image 1: Stack Overflow](https://cdn.sstatic.net/Sites/stackoverflow/img/logo.png)    Q&amp;amp;A for professional and enthusiast programmers    SELECT      DATEFROMPARTS(YEAR(CreationDate), MONTH(CreationDate), 1) AS [Month],      COUNT(*) AS [Questions]  FROM Posts  WHERE       PostTypeId = 1  GROUP BY       DATEFROMPARTS(YEAR(CreationDate), MONTH(CreationDate),…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some argue that AI delivered a &amp;#34;blow of mercy&amp;#34; to a platform already in decline since 2017, others contend that StackOverflow’s collapse was primarily self-inflicted due to a &amp;#34;hostile&amp;#34; culture and &amp;#34;iron-fisted&amp;#34; moderation that alienated new users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957311&quot; title=&quot;Any social organization needs to carefully consider their inclusion-exclusion curve with intentionality. I think a lot of people might balk at the word &amp;#39;inclusivity&amp;#39; today, but StackExchange had ridiculously high barriers to participation, making it inclusive to the long-time users on the site, but exclusive to the newbie participants who found themselves blocked for asking questions. They slowly killed the site in this manner. The community might have survived this folly, even with AI, because…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48958532&quot; title=&quot;I can totally see myself asking questions on SO even these days, but there’s a good chance they’ll lock my post so why bother. Something about the SO incentive system created the most hostile platform imaginable.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957334&quot; title=&quot;Looks like SO was already dying since 2017. I think other helpful places like reddit, discord, web forums etc might be what hit SO 2014-15 onwards. AI seems to have given it a blow of mercy to end the misery.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics highlight that the site&amp;#39;s rigid rules against conversation and its &amp;#34;ridiculously high barriers to participation&amp;#34; destroyed any sense of community, leaving it vulnerable once AI provided a more frictionless way to get answers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957257&quot; title=&quot;SO did that all to themselves when they decided they didn&amp;#39;t want a community to form and that only question and answers mattered. The moment something else allowed to have a better way to get your answers, there was no reason to go there, because there was no community. I still don&amp;#39;t understand why anyone would go with that whole &amp;#39;no conversation please&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959058&quot; title=&quot;Their rules, (I believe unintentionally) give iron-fisted fiefdom rulers a toolbox of justifications to control and alienate under the guise of protecting the quality of the site data. I honestly don’t even think most of the control freak mods could objectively judge the propriety of their actions because it was all encouraged by the rules. (And I do not think this was universal among the mods, but it was certainly endemic to the site culture.) Well, the outcome was predictable. Before I worked…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. However, a counter-argument suggests that aggressive moderation was actually the key to their initial SEO success, and the recent decline is simply the result of AI answering queries directly and cutting off search engine traffic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959970&quot; title=&quot;The graph proves the cause of their decline was AI, and not aggressive question moderation. Ask yourself: in what year did it become difficult to ask questions on Stack Overflow? 2014? 2016? 2018? 2020? Aggressive question-closing was part of their design from the very beginning. Their high barriers to question-asking was the cause of their rise , as their primary user was never question writers: it was Google, and anonymous Google users. The whole thing was an SEO play from start to finish.…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/math/comments/1uxj3cy/after_openais_cdc_proof_announcement_gpt56_used_a/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GPT-5.6 used a prompt to close a 30-year gap in convex optimization&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (old.reddit.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957779&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;587 points · 385 comments · by mbustamanter&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The provided link is inaccessible due to a network block, preventing a summary of the specific story regarding GPT-5.6 and convex optimization. &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/math/comments/1uxj3cy/after_openais_cdc_proof_announcement_gpt56_used_a/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Blocked    URL Source: https://old.reddit.com/r/math/comments/1uxj3cy/after_openais_cdc_proof_announcement_gpt56_used_a/    Warning: Target URL returned error 403: Forbidden    Markdown Content:  ## whoa there, pardner!    Your request has been blocked due to a network policy.    Try logging in or creating an account [here](https://www.reddit.com/login/) to get back to browsing.    If you&amp;#39;re running a script or application, please register or sign in with your developer credentials…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The breakthrough in convex optimization has sparked a debate over whether LLMs have moved beyond &amp;#34;stochastic parrots&amp;#34; to provide genuine, novel scientific contributions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957994&quot; title=&quot;Waiting for comments saying that LLMs can&amp;#39;t produce anything new and general goalpost moving.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959050&quot; title=&quot;Genuine question: If you still or did think LLMs are just stochastic parrots that just summarize everything and have no form of creativity, what do you think after seeing results like this? I&amp;#39;m very curious how people reconcile their fear/hatred of AI with actual objective reality. This is actually what interests me most about the whole AI thing. How we tell ourselves what we tell ourselves.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view the automation of complex math and coding as a &amp;#34;dystopian&amp;#34; erasure of human thought and professional training grounds &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48958194&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I don&amp;#39;t think researchers in math/TCS will be made obsolete, but I think it will instead no longer make sense to work on any low-hanging, or even medium-hanging (you know what I mean) fruit. We&amp;#39;ll be needed for problems where actual novel approaches are needed. I wonder how this compares to what we see happening with &amp;#39;juniors&amp;#39; in software development?  In math research, do you also get the training for the profession from working on the low hanging fruits for a while, to then move to the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959138&quot; title=&quot;This is all a depressing and bleak future that I don’t look forward to. One solution is to ban LLM’s, to artificially create a demand for human thought, that just feels like living in an artificially constructed zoo. Another solution is humans don’t do anything that AI can do better , / doesn’t need the human touch. So I suppose we will all become artists, sportsmen or politicians, the only jobs that will remain except for select few. Maybe this is ok, I don’t know. Another solution is we find…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue this shift is &amp;#34;utopian,&amp;#34; potentially freeing humanity from labor if societal structures like capitalism are adapted &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48958103&quot; title=&quot;Crazy how intelligence is cheap, efficient and commonplace now.   We humans better refocusing our energy on our core values/principles, given most of our skills are becoming irrelevant&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959852&quot; title=&quot;This is utopian friend! Literally anything you wanted to make is no plausible to make if not now then in the next couple years. The thing you’re worried about is capitalism and the connection with working to having the right to keep living.  If you can throw off that mental shackle you can start to see how this can be amazing, but you have to drop the idea that everyone has to work at a job for someone else to provide some service in order to do it.  It’s hard, I know, but change your mindset…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong consensus that &amp;#34;recipe-based&amp;#34; skills are becoming obsolete, shifting the value toward deep conceptual knowledge and the ability to pilot AI agents, even as the relevance of &amp;#34;prompt engineering&amp;#34; itself is questioned &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48958667&quot; title=&quot;Around here AI isn&amp;#39;t really more of a threat to juniors than it is to seniors. It&amp;#39;s a threat to the people who have been taught &amp;#39;recipies&amp;#39; rather than applied computer science. You can have excellent seniors who can do TDD, DRY, SOLID and so on, who also happen to have no idea what a L1 cache miss is. The current AI models know all of those things, but they struggle applying them correctly without someone piloting them. Even in the energy industry where I work, where you&amp;#39;d think it would be…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48958034&quot; title=&quot;What I&amp;#39;m feeling is that there&amp;#39;s a need to study how to use AI well. I&amp;#39;ve seen professors using AI, and it was amazing. In that sense, I think AI prompt input will become stratified. In the past, implementation skills were very important, but these days, concepts feel more important this is one of those things. It&amp;#39;s not that AI brings equality, but rather that the output varies depending on how much background knowledge you have. You could call it a stratification of input I&amp;#39;m starting to feel…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48958112&quot; title=&quot;You’re at least 18 months out of date claiming that prompting will be the new hot skill. Turns out LLMs are also good at prompting other LLMs.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://petapixel.com/2026/07/16/mayor-mamdani-says-landlords-cant-secretly-use-ai-images-to-advertise-properties/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;NYC may require landlords and realtors to disclose the use of AI in listings&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (petapixel.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48962983&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;572 points · 260 comments · by gnabgib&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani has introduced a &amp;#34;Rental Ripoff Report&amp;#34; recommending that landlords and realtors be required to disclose when property listings use AI-generated or digitally altered imagery to deceive potential tenants. &lt;a href=&quot;https://petapixel.com/2026/07/16/mayor-mamdani-says-landlords-cant-secretly-use-ai-images-to-advertise-properties/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Mayor Mamdani Says Landlords Can’t Secretly Use AI Images to Advertise Properties    URL Source: https://petapixel.com/2026/07/16/mayor-mamdani-says-landlords-cant-secretly-use-ai-images-to-advertise-properties/    Published Time: 2026-07-16T20:39:10+00:00    Markdown Content:  [](https://petapixel.com/)    [Subscribe](https://petapixel.com/members)[Sign In](https://petapixel.com/login/)    *   [News](https://petapixel.com/topic/news/)      *   [Industry News](https://petapixel.com/topic/news/)     …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The proposed regulation aims to prevent landlords from &amp;#34;secretly&amp;#34; using AI-generated images, requiring disclosure rather than a total ban &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963400&quot; title=&quot;HN title is missing the operative word &amp;#39;secretly&amp;#39;. The real title: &amp;gt; Mayor Mamdani Says Landlords Can’t Secretly Use AI Images to Advertise Properties The article contents align with the real title: you just disclose AI usage when advertising rentals.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Supporters argue this addresses deceptive practices where AI warps room dimensions to fit unrealistic furniture &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963206&quot; title=&quot;This is awesome! StreetEasy is how many New Yorkers find apartments. In the past few years, it has been flooded with AI-staged apartments. The AI stagings warp the room to fit furniture that would 100% certainly not fit there. It’s deceptive, and I’m glad it at least requires disclosure now (although I wish it were fully banned)&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, while critics contend the rule is a &amp;#34;nothing burger&amp;#34; because similar disclosure requirements for &amp;#34;virtually staged&amp;#34; photos have historically failed to stop misleading listings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963933&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s super annoying, but  this is a total nothing burger because he doesn&amp;#39;t actually have any power to do anything here. This has also been a problem long before AI with &amp;#39;virtually staged&amp;#39; apartments.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48964322&quot; title=&quot;The Mayor is not a dictator and can&amp;#39;t just make up laws or regulations. He can probably get DCWP to engage in the normal rule making process, but at most this is probably going to get some AI disclosure somewhere, which is what we had for &amp;#39;virtually staged&amp;#39; lies.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users suggest that without strict penalties, every listing will simply include a blanket AI disclosure, rendering the regulation ineffective &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963570&quot; title=&quot;That kind of regulation has failed over and over. The obvious outcome is that every listing will have misleading AI &amp;#39;photos&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963592&quot; title=&quot;What? Is your claim that every photo will be labeled as AI-modified, or that people won&amp;#39;t label AI-modified images? If the latter, just penalize the listing agents. Trivial. The entire issue is that the platforms are already inundated with misleading, unlabeled AI-modified images.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Others argue for broader bans on AI in sensitive sectors like hiring and dating &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963144&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s several other areas that would be good to categorically ban AI usage from: - gambling    - dating    - hiring    - advertising It shouldn&amp;#39;t even be controversial that this would be broadly good for society. I say that as an AI maximalist: I fully trust AI with these things. I do not trust the humans using the AI.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, or suggest that requiring square footage would be a more practical solution for NYC&amp;#39;s rental market &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48964271&quot; title=&quot;Not going to lie, I wish they also added a square footage as a legal requirement too. It is entirely baffling to me as to why, but NYC is the only major city in the US I&amp;#39;ve ever lived in where it is genuinely a problem. In all other cities, I had no issues with that, pretty much every single posting online had square footage. Meanwhile, on StreetEasy (and other platforms listing NYC rental units), looking for apartments is a major pain, because majority have zero square footage info. And then…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://maurycyz.com/projects/bad_jpeg/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Regressive JPEGs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (maurycyz.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48954851&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;712 points · 68 comments · by vitaut&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By manipulating the &amp;#34;progressive&amp;#34; scan feature of JPEG files, a developer demonstrated how to embed low-resolution animations and interactive applications within a single image that &amp;#34;plays&amp;#34; as it downloads over a network. &lt;a href=&quot;https://maurycyz.com/projects/bad_jpeg/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Regressive JPEGs: (Maurycy&amp;#39;s blog)    URL Source: https://maurycyz.com/projects/bad_jpeg/    Published Time: Sunday, 19-Jul-2026 05:35:36 GMT    Markdown Content:  **2026-07-17**  One of the cool features of JPEG files is that there&amp;#39;s the option to save low frequency components first. This means that a partially downloaded image will be displayed at low resolution instead of being cut off.    In the file, this works by breaking up the compressed data into multiple &amp;#39;scans&amp;#39;, each prefixed with a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights that while progressive JPEGs were once standard advice, they now significantly slow down decoding speeds and offer little modern visual value &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48956315&quot; title=&quot;Adjacent advice:  I&amp;#39;ve recently played with opengl and jpeg turbo and I wanted to display images fast. I don&amp;#39;t remember exact numbers, but enabling progressive for a jpeg was a significant slowdown for decoding.  So if anyone like me is stuck with the old school advice that progressive is an nice to have, it&amp;#39;s likely not. I personally don&amp;#39;t remember any visual progressive image buildup in like decades, so it&amp;#39;s not doing anything valuable at all.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Users noted that similar techniques in PNGs can be used to create animations by controlling server-side delivery delays, though this often bypasses official formats like APNG &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48956492&quot; title=&quot;I did something very similar with progressive (adam7 interlaced) PNG: https://www.da.vidbuchanan.co.uk/adamation/image.png &amp;gt; so playback is entirely dependent on network delay Ultimately true, but I set up my server to send each &amp;#39;frame&amp;#39; separately, with a fixed delay between each. Each frame is small so unless your network is unusually slow, the timing is set by my server.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957345&quot; title=&quot;Interesting that people are making hacks of PNG to do animations, yet there&amp;#39;s also APNG sitting over there saying &amp;#39;Hey I exist!&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Concerns were also raised regarding the use of these &amp;#34;hacks&amp;#34; for steganography or hiding unsavory content from automated filters &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957407&quot; title=&quot;If i remember correctly, some other places of the internet (4chan) completely this sort of behavior because people use it to hide images of ...unsavory topics&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48956319&quot; title=&quot;I wonder if and how you can use this for steganography, hiding data in plain sight. I bet most automated image analysis programs would only consider the final image. I sure some highschooler can use this to bypass their schools contentfilter&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.benlandautaylor.com/p/if-you-build-it-they-will-come&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;If You Build It, They Will Come&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (benlandautaylor.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959090&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;452 points · 193 comments · by barry-cotter&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that the most effective way to integrate into a new community is to actively organize events rather than just attending them, as most social groups suffer from a lack of people willing to do the work of building social fabric. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.benlandautaylor.com/p/if-you-build-it-they-will-come&quot; title=&quot;Title: If You Build It, They Will Come    URL Source: https://www.benlandautaylor.com/p/if-you-build-it-they-will-come    Published Time: 2026-07-18T02:36:41+00:00    Markdown Content:  Several times in my life I’ve tried to break in with a new social group. I ran into a cool community I wanted to join, or I moved to a new city and wanted to make friends there, or I just wanted to broaden my horizons.    Pretty quickly I learned that the best and fastest way to join a group is to organize events where…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the fragility of social institutions, noting that many people view communities as &amp;#34;wild blueberry bushes&amp;#34; that exist naturally rather than as fragile systems requiring constant maintenance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48961211&quot; title=&quot;// Lots of people have a sort of consumer attitude towards their communities, where they take everything for granted. I saw things this way when I was young. A social scene is an automatic feature of the world that appears on its own, like a wild blueberry bush. It starts sprouting parties and dinners and conferences and reading groups as naturally as the bush sprouts berries True in general. As a kid you think of things as bigger than you. Like whoever maintains a hiking trail or runs your…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48961923&quot; title=&quot;There is a point where the things you took for granted start decaying. Your body, your things, your communities, your relationships. It&amp;#39;s only when you start repairing or replacing them that you really value maintenance and the people doing it. As you point out, it&amp;#39;s usually done by surprisingly few, surprisingly motivated people, and their work is often underappreciated until they stop doing it. Maybe we should teach people to maintain something early on, as children, so that they learn to…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some lament a &amp;#34;cataclysmic divide&amp;#34; where grassroots traditions failed to pass to younger generations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48961736&quot; title=&quot;America used to be awash with grassroots social institutions. I know an elderly gent who belonged to the Lions _and_ two similar organizations. When my mother was young, there were dances and dinners multiple nights a week. Which, for me, raises the question why weren&amp;#39;t these things passed down? Why weren&amp;#39;t the young a kind of apprentices to the old? That seems like the natural progression. But we see this generational rift in many areas of American life, including on the job training or…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others highlight the personal risks of organizing, ranging from the threat of platform shifts to physical harassment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959726&quot; title=&quot;Do not expect a reward, dude. I spent 15 years building a local community, I had 10,000 daily users once, people recognized me on the street, then everyone left on a whim when Facebook made it easier to hang in one&amp;#39;s own echo chambers. I still think it was worth it. Once in a while, I bump into a stranger, and they tell me how the found their only true love because of me, or how they landed a job that made them loads of money because I facilitated communication in our community. Other times...…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48960007&quot; title=&quot;You really have to do it for the love of the game. It can be surprisingly vulnerable to be the social fabric, and it’s super easy to fall into various toxic inner dialogs when you’re busy and others don’t pick up the slack, or if others don’t reciprocate the effort, or worst of all when others don’t include you for whatever reason.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these challenges, there is a consensus that active maintenance is essential to prevent decay, though debate remains over whether &amp;#34;free riders&amp;#34; are a sign of systemic failure or a market opportunity for new organizers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963885&quot; title=&quot;The subway should be free, and continuous fare hikes when you&amp;#39;re already double paying with your eyes because of all the advertising they shove in front of you is more incentive to turnstile jump.  Overpaid do-nothing senior adminstrators and lawmakers who are in the pocket of privatization are the problem, not that 17 year old.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963931&quot; title=&quot;Enforcing fares massively decreases vandalism, and antisocial behavior on public transportation. If you don’t have public transportation that I feel safe having a 10-year-old ride on unaccompanied by an adult then you do not have public transportation. You have a very expensive drug addict shelter on wheels/rails.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959757&quot; title=&quot;“I’ve come to believe that part of today’s problem of social alienation is a problem of too many free riders.” I started planning street festivals a few years ago. It’s now a lucrative and growing business for me. The demand for events at all scales vastly outstrips supply, and I think growing social isolation is part of the reason. The free riders might seem like a problem to someone who just wants there to be events, but it is a huge opportunity to us who throw them.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://environment.ec.europa.eu/news/ban-destruction-unsold-clothes-and-shoes-enters-application-2026-07-17_en&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;EU ban on destruction of unsold clothes and shoes enters into application&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (environment.ec.europa.eu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48958269&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;308 points · 301 comments · by robtherobber&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Large EU companies are now prohibited from destroying unsold clothes and footwear under new Ecodesign regulations, a measure aimed at reducing environmental waste by requiring businesses to prioritize the reuse, donation, or recycling of surplus goods. &lt;a href=&quot;https://environment.ec.europa.eu/news/ban-destruction-unsold-clothes-and-shoes-enters-application-2026-07-17_en&quot; title=&quot;Title: Ban on destruction of unsold clothes and shoes enters into application    URL Source: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/news/ban-destruction-unsold-clothes-and-shoes-enters-application-2026-07-17_en    Published Time: 2026-07-17T14:00:00+02:00    Markdown Content:  From 19 July, large companies across the EU are prohibited from destroying unsold clothes, clothing accessories and footwear. Medium-sized companies will be subject to the same rules from 2030.    The measure, introduced under the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The EU&amp;#39;s ban on destroying unsold apparel has sparked debate over its impact on inventory management, with some users predicting shortages in uncommon sizes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959149&quot; title=&quot;It seems like this policy would lead to shortages in less common sizes of clothing.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; and others questioning if the policy prohibits recycling programs like Nike’s &amp;#34;grind&amp;#34; process &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959860&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Companies may only destroy unsold clothes and shoes in limited cases, such as when items are unsafe or damaged, counterfeit or infringing intellectual property rights, or are rejected by charities or donation schemes.&amp;#39; Nike&amp;#39;s unsold, defective, or returned shoes are ground up to make carpet padding. They&amp;#39;re processed by the truckload in a large grinding machine. It seems that under these rules, this would be illegal - ?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue for expanding such bans to include edible food to prevent artificial supply restriction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959317&quot; title=&quot;It should be illegal for stores to throw away edible food.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48958937&quot; title=&quot;some places already do this for food where anything thats after sell by date but still safe to eat has to be donated to a food bank. i think it should be expanded to cover more categories than food and clothes when reuse and recycling infra grows to take the demand. its not just good for the environment it also prevents producers from restricting supply to keep their profits high. the ultimate goal is make it illegal to destroy or intentionally damage anything usable before it reaches…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, critics contend that mandatory donations or storage could increase consumer prices and disincentivize charitable giving &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959337&quot; title=&quot;Makes it more expensive for everyone and also decentivize donating food to homeless or anyone in need.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959566&quot; title=&quot;They have to deal with less sales and or storing excess inventory. Let&amp;#39;s say you have some bruised bananas. You either have to keep them on the shelf till they rot (less space for sellable product) or donate them and then people won&amp;#39;t buy as many bananas, so you need to raise the price.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, there is concern regarding the cumulative administrative burden these reporting requirements place on small and mid-sized businesses &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48960026&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; To prevent misuse, businesses relying on these exemptions must provide proof (e.g. documents or test results) and publish annual reports on what they have discarded. I wonder if anybody is keeping track of everything a mid size business needs to take care of. Each particular report probably sounds like a reasonable request, but by now they&amp;#39;re probably well into hundreds, and they&amp;#39;re all outside the actual scope of the business (e.g. it may seem manageable for the bureaucrats designing them,…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://velvetshark.com/ai-company-logos-that-look-like-buttholes&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why do AI company logos look like buttholes? (2025)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (velvetshark.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48956924&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;443 points · 146 comments · by miniBill&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The article explores a trend in AI branding where companies like OpenAI and Anthropic use circular, gradient-heavy logos that inadvertently resemble human anatomy due to design conformity, risk aversion, and psychological preferences for &amp;#34;friendly&amp;#34; shapes. &lt;a href=&quot;https://velvetshark.com/ai-company-logos-that-look-like-buttholes&quot; title=&quot;Title: Why do AI company logos look like buttholes?    URL Source: https://velvetshark.com/ai-company-logos-that-look-like-buttholes    Published Time: 2025-04-10T21:30:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: AI company logos with suspicious circular designs](https://velvetshark.com/_next/image?url=%2Fimages%2Fai-company-logos-that-look-like-buttholes%2Fwhy-do-AI-company-logos-look-like-buttholes.png&amp;amp;w=3840&amp;amp;q=75)    If you pay attention to AI company branding, you&amp;#39;ll notice a pattern:    1.   Circular…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion debates whether AI logos are intentionally anatomical or simply victims of a &amp;#34;Rorschach test&amp;#34; where any circular design is misidentified as an orifice &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957342&quot; title=&quot;Claude is the only one that looks like an asshole.  The rest are just circular, or not even that.  Does every circle in the world look like an asshole?  Car wheels?  Pizzas?  Camera Lenses?  Ferris wheels?  This is like a Rorschach test.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the logos represent symbolic apertures or Jungian mandalas designed to draw focus to a central organizing principle, others point out that the trend may just be a byproduct of modern grayscale design preferences &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957122&quot; title=&quot;They’re apertures; symbolically things emerge from them. “…but that’s really all a butthole is, an aperture”   - Louis CK&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957693&quot; title=&quot;Jung might have seen a relation to circular maNDalas, which as per him were apparently everywhere: https://www.google.com/search?udm=2&amp;amp;q=circular+mandala IIRC, circular maNDalas as per Jung draw your attention towards its center, which is the most important part of the maNDala. For Jung, the circular maNDala represented the self - the totality of the psyche - with the center representing its organizing principle. I&amp;#39;ve noticed how this pattern naturally arises in circular flowers, with the…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957199&quot; title=&quot;I guess it has to do with the fact that everything is greyscale nowadays ... did you notice there are no more coloured cars, and the few that are there are all faded.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. A notable point of contention is the Claude logo, which some users find uniquely suggestive, especially when interacted with &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957342&quot; title=&quot;Claude is the only one that looks like an asshole.  The rest are just circular, or not even that.  Does every circle in the world look like an asshole?  Car wheels?  Pizzas?  Camera Lenses?  Ferris wheels?  This is like a Rorschach test.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957398&quot; title=&quot;Have you tried clicking the Claude logo? https://x.com/ertug/status/2072339797708849398&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=3818307&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Goodbye, and Thanks for All the Bikesheds&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (queue.acm.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48960155&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;284 points · 260 comments · by Ygg2&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=3818307&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the tension between digital privacy and age-verification regulations, with some arguing that privacy absolutism has backfired by preventing a &amp;#34;middle ground&amp;#34; and inviting sweeping government crackdowns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48960670&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not anti-privacy to point out the obvious that privacy-advocacy is sometimes at odds with governments and the will of voters at large. Privacy is being abused by criminals to victimize people at scale.  Just because privacy is a moral good doesn&amp;#39;t mean you are morally off the hook for enabling criminals. Governments are so aware of this they&amp;#39;re passing sweeping laws against it.  This is your new reality -- you can&amp;#39;t just bury your head in the sand.  The whole point was saying that there…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48960956&quot; title=&quot;First read of this pissed me off, but subsequent reads gave a much different opinion. Do yourself a favor and read this, a few times, and take a moment to actually try and see what the author&amp;#39;s getting at.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters suggest that age restrictions should be mandatory for consumer devices to protect children from harmful technology &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48960858&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think age restriction will impact FOSS in the long term. If there are some regulations that threaten FOSS now, they are going to be adopted in the long term. Regulations for age restriction are understandable. A lot of modern technology is harming kids (and I don&amp;#39;t mean dirty videos, social media seems to be much more harmful). A sensible regulator would leave some responsibility to the parents, but require restrictions for consumer devices (smartphones, laptops). Maybe even enable age…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that such measures infringe on adult rights and that responsibility should remain solely with parents &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48960964&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; A sensible regulator would leave some responsibility to the parents (Speaking as a parent of three) why can&amp;#39;t we just leave all responsibility to the parents?   In our experience in the offline world it seems this applies! I speak as someone who&amp;#39;s taken each of my three children - for two of them, multiple times - to the emergency room to be treated for broken bones incurred in the course of Real Life[tm]. Yes, they play contact sports. Yes, we use Family Link with pretty restrictive…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48961058&quot; title=&quot;I strongly disagree. There are no kids in my household, and no one else ever uses my devices, so the idea that I need to prove that I&amp;#39;m not a kid for me to be able to pay bills or file taxes on a stock device is ridiculous.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48960743&quot; title=&quot;Age verification is not the will of the voters.  It is the will of large political donors (specifically tech companies and religious censorship groups).  It is certainly not the will of adult citizens who use adult websites, who have overwhelming shown in their usage patterns they will abandon any website that tries to do age verification. Parental controls remains the right way to do age gating.  It works today and has no privacy impacts.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the thread touches on the inefficiency of &amp;#34;bikeshedding&amp;#34; in software development, suggesting it is often cheaper to allow engineers to implement reversible decisions twice than to waste thousands in salary on prolonged debates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48962166&quot; title=&quot;A bit of an aside, but after someone introduced me to the notion of Reversible Decisions, it quickly became apparent to me that the solution to the bikeshed problem is to throw money at it before the roosters can start preening about which color the shed should be. Decisions that are reversible should just go with the instinctive answer of whoever volunteers to work on it. I&amp;#39;ve been in many meeting rooms where, because of the number and caliber of people in the room, we&amp;#39;ve blown $5000 worth of…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://codex-resets.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Codex Resets&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (codex-resets.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963465&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;296 points · 192 comments · by denysvitali&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Codex Resets tracks OpenAI&amp;#39;s frequent, often unannounced resets of usage limits for Codex and ChatGPT Work users, which occur on an average interval of 8.9 days to compensate for outages, celebrate milestones, or mitigate technical issues. &lt;a href=&quot;https://codex-resets.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Codex Resets — OpenAI Codex Usage Limit Reset Tracker    URL Source: https://codex-resets.com/    Markdown Content:  Tracking when OpenAI&amp;#39;s Codex usage limits get reset, announced (often out of the blue) by [@thsottiaux](https://x.com/thsottiaux) on X.    Last reset yesterday    Jul 18, 2026, 3:28 AM    Total resets 35    Average interval Avg. interval 8.9d    Longest gap 67.7d    ## Reset activity    Last 26 weeks, one cell per day (UTC)    Mon Wed Fri    ## Announcement log    1.   yesterday Jul 18, 2026, 3:28…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The introduction of banked and frequent usage resets has significantly increased user reliance on Codex, with some power users noting that their activity would cost thousands of dollars at API rates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963595&quot; title=&quot;Crazy value for money now with the banked resets. At my $COMPANY, we have claude enterprise at API pricing. I&amp;#39;ve blown through $10k already this month, opting for Opus 4.8 w/ Sonnet 5 agents where possible. On my codex pro plan, I am 5.6 sol&amp;#39;ing my way everyday with the odd ultra mode. Point being my real API usage here must be very unsustainable!&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963988&quot; title=&quot;Those resets and the removal of the 5-hour usage limit are quietly anchoring me to a much higher usage baseline. I&amp;#39;ve stopped rationing and just spawn a bunch of agents to work at whatever pace I want, because there always seem to be more resets on the way (at least true for the last week). And now I am actually worried about that if one day they just stop doing so, my &amp;#39;normal&amp;#39; workflow will suddenly exceed the limit, and upgrading will feel like a step backwards.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view this as a strategic move to gain mindshare and hook developers into high-usage workflows, others warn that these subsidies are likely unsustainable and may lead to future price &amp;#34;squeezes&amp;#34; once market dominance is achieved &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963514&quot; title=&quot;How long is this gonna last? OpenAI obviously is doing it to gain mindshare but they&amp;#39;re burning money before their IPO and can&amp;#39;t sustain these resets. They&amp;#39;ve bought a lot of dev goodwill tho, which matters I guess.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48964028&quot; title=&quot;All these resets are given because of rival competition. When they win the market, we are going to be squeezed $$$.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963811&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Point being my real API usage here must be very unsustainable! I think it’s funny that everyone anchors to the API pricing as the real cost. Most likely is that their API costs are printing profits. They can sell the subscription plans at a slight loss because it gets more people like you hooked on GPT models at home and suggesting them at work, where the real money is made. I think their subscription plans go mostly unused when averaged across all subscribers, too. Some customers are getting…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a desire for better programmatic tools to track these quotas, as the current unpredictable reset schedule creates a &amp;#34;game-like&amp;#34; pressure to maximize usage before the next cycle &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963777&quot; title=&quot;I really wish there was a canonical platform endpoint to programmatically check Codex usage amount and the quota reset times so I could just vibecode an app to alert &amp;#39;hey, your usage just went to 100% so that means OpenAI did a reset&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;hey, your 5-hour usage is at 10%, wrap up what you&amp;#39;re doing&amp;#39;. The only way to do it now is through shenanigans with the Codex App Server which is not ideal.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963811&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Point being my real API usage here must be very unsustainable! I think it’s funny that everyone anchors to the API pricing as the real cost. Most likely is that their API costs are printing profits. They can sell the subscription plans at a slight loss because it gets more people like you hooked on GPT models at home and suggesting them at work, where the real money is made. I think their subscription plans go mostly unused when averaged across all subscribers, too. Some customers are getting…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.neatnik.net/hardcore-indieweb&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hardcore IndieWeb: Run your own website 100% independently for only $0.01/day&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (neatnik.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48962758&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;248 points · 199 comments · by cdrnsf&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#34;Hardcore IndieWeb&amp;#34; approach advocates for total digital independence by manually authoring HTML files on a local hard drive and uploading them to a host like NearlyFreeSpeech for as little as $0.01/day, bypassing complex CMS platforms and subscriptions to ensure complete content ownership and portability. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.neatnik.net/hardcore-indieweb&quot; title=&quot;Title: Hardcore IndieWeb: Run your own website 100% independently for only $0.01/day    URL Source: https://www.neatnik.net/hardcore-indieweb    Published Time: Sat, 18 Jul 2026 23:55:59 GMT    Markdown Content:  [Adam Newbold](https://adam.omg.lol/)     July 18, 2026    If you’re not familiar with the [IndieWeb](https://indieweb.org/) movement, it’s a practical approach to maintaining your presence on the web that emphasizes fully owning your identity and your content. This is especially relevant now, at…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some commenters find it ironic that basic web hosting is now framed as a &amp;#34;strange new concept&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963313&quot; title=&quot;Kind of funny that this is like some strange new concept... Having a web server and putting your stuff on it.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that teaching these fundamentals is vital given that many new developers lack experience with basic file systems or command-line tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963353&quot; title=&quot;Considering many people doesn&amp;#39;t know what a file is, keeping the spirit alive is important, I think.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963425&quot; title=&quot;I encountered juniors straight out of school who don’t know what tar is, or rsync, or what a symlink is. It’s all learnable and everyone starts somewhere.  But you’d think natural curiosity would kick in and they’d have picked up some of this on their own by the time they have a job.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a debate regarding the best way to achieve true independence: suggestions range from hosting on home hardware via port forwarding or Tor to avoid third-party reliance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963121&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s good advice, but one need not even include the &amp;#39;upload it to a web server&amp;#39; these days now that home connections are so fast. Install some static webserver on your desktop computer (nginx, caddy, whatever), forward the port 80 at your router to it&amp;#39;s lanip:80, and just save .html and files to the web directory using your normal desktop interface. It doesn&amp;#39;t matter if you shut off the computer sometimes. Uptime doesn&amp;#39;t matter. Optionally file transfer (rsync, etc) this local copy to a VPS or…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963738&quot; title=&quot;Nearlyfreespeech is a great service though not a 100% independent as your still relying on them. I think the closest you can get to 100% independent without running your own internet infrastructure is either port forwarding from your home (if allowed) or hosting a website through TOR which isn&amp;#39;t too hard. You just have to download the browser and edit a config file (torrc) with the port you want on the network. Not ideal of course though because anyone who wants to visit your website will need…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963300&quot; title=&quot;I self host my site [1] on an old Mac mini in a Swift backend and sqlite database. Only thing I rely upon someone for is Cloudflare tunnels for free. I could replace that with port forwarding but so far, this way is pretty good. [1] https://limereader.com/&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, though some warn that home hosting invites security risks from bots &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963298&quot; title=&quot;However, it&amp;#39;ll also bring all the bots and &amp;#39;wild west&amp;#39; of the internet to your house when you run your web server from home, and for anyone who has a couple of spare dollars, it&amp;#39;s a much wiser choice to run a small VPS elsewhere to weather the storm.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, participants note that even with independent hosting, users remain vulnerable to domain registrars hijacking their identity, highlighting a need for uncontrollable top-level domains &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963176&quot; title=&quot;Well this is great, even going further and hosting the site itself and serve it instead of webhosts, but, now we have domains issue, a domain registrar hijacking your domain, which is your life work, email, etc., so there’s a need to have a free tld that’s uncontrollable by any entity, .onion isn’t practical obviously.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ykdojo.github.io/claude-controls-mac/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Setting up your spare Mac for Claude Code to control, a step-by-step guide&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ykdojo.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959392&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;245 points · 179 comments · by ykev&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This guide explains how to transform a spare Mac into a dedicated, isolated environment for Claude Code, enabling secure remote control via SSH or mobile app while mitigating risks to your primary machine through fresh user accounts, passwordless sudo, and persistent tmux sessions for computer use. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ykdojo.github.io/claude-controls-mac/&quot; title=&quot;Title: How to set up your spare Mac for Claude Code to fully control - a step-by-step guide    URL Source: https://ykdojo.github.io/claude-controls-mac/    Published Time: Sat, 18 Jul 2026 20:52:00 GMT    Markdown Content:  ## [claude-controls-mac](https://ykdojo.github.io/claude-controls-mac/)    Here’s a full step-by-step guide on how to turn your spare Mac into an always-on machine Claude Code can fully control, with computer use enabled. You’ll be able to talk to it from your phone through the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Debaters are deeply divided on the utility of 24/7 autonomous agents, with skeptics arguing that the technology lacks a &amp;#34;killer app&amp;#34; and often requires constant supervision to correct hallucinations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959923&quot; title=&quot;I still don&amp;#39;t understand what these freaks are doing running these agents 24/7 on machines. What are they doing? Managing a todo list? You mean crossing items off as you complete them? Research tasks? To do what? Never really get good answers. There is no killer app. Just bikeshedding.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48960252&quot; title=&quot;I just cannot come up with a good AI-is-actually-24/7-helping-me-out use case. Please help: I wánt to need this!&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48962612&quot; title=&quot;I always have to correct its hallucinations during the day . Why would I ever let it run unsupervised overnight?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents suggest these agents excel at &amp;#34;immensely powerful&amp;#34; workflows like automated log monitoring, triaging alerts, and opening pull requests while the user is away &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48960043&quot; title=&quot;I think you need to open your mind to the possibilities? For example: - scanning logs for errors and - opening issues which are then auto-triaged and - PRs are opened for them and auto-reviewed and - merged (and deployed). This workflow alone is immensely powerful, and takes alot of burden off the team.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48960675&quot; title=&quot;Many Claude Code power users don’t really use IDEs anymore, so the only purpose of them working from their laptop instead of a phone is because that is the normal way to do it. Here is a real use case: you are are responsible for some alerting channel. You have datadog/ cloud logging/ github all connected. You see a bunch of alerts come through while you are out and about and you prompt CC to investigate - Claude triages and says “all of the sudden you are getting time outs from this bank API…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48961838&quot; title=&quot;Do you do software development? Is there any work left at the end of the day? Have it do that stuff.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users prefer isolating agents on spare hardware for security, others argue that virtualized environments are more efficient for testing and easy recovery &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48960606&quot; title=&quot;Outside of the article&amp;#39;s mentioned graphics development, there is no reason to isolate an agent using actual hardware. I threw together this script[0] using libvirt to give claude its own graphical desktop env to be able to do user acceptance testing with Chrome. It has full root and can do what ever. If it makes a mess, I can dump and reinstall in seconds. 0: https://gist.github.com/smith153/04b4068b5a2d7b234f1c3d5992d...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959493&quot; title=&quot;I currently have Claude Desktop installed on a separate Mac mini M4 and control it with Dispatch.  Is there a reason to do this method, it still seems the way I have it setup it has full control over the local account I gave it on the Mac mini.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tangled.org/gleam.run/gleam&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Gleam Is Now on Tangled&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tangled.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959143&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;244 points · 153 comments · by nerdypepper&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Gleam programming language, a type-safe language for building scalable systems, has established a repository on the Tangled platform, featuring a codebase primarily written in Rust. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tangled.org/gleam.run/gleam&quot; title=&quot;Title: gleam.run/gleam    URL Source: https://tangled.org/gleam.run/gleam    Markdown Content:  [alpha](https://tangled.org/)    [Login](https://tangled.org/login)or[Join now](https://tangled.org/signup)    [![Image 1](https://avatar.tangled.sh/bad5d27d5193b7aac2e94deb100f6417beeeeb63eeff64b1c378eb4a148675d9/did:plc:k5vecqzf4d5mdvkcu3mx6l5g?size=tiny&amp;amp;v=bafkreib) gleam.run](https://tangled.org/gleam.run)/[gleam](https://tangled.org/gleam.run/gleam)    Star[203](https://tangled.org/gleam.run/gleam/stars…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on Tangled, a decentralized git provider built on ATProto, with users questioning why the Gleam language chose a VC-funded platform over established alternatives like Codeberg or Radicle &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48960237&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d love to hear why they chose a VC funded forge over e.g. Codeberg. Doesn&amp;#39;t really fit the &amp;#39;friendly language&amp;#39; claim IMO&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959472&quot; title=&quot;Why Tangled instead of something more established like Codeberg, or if f/loss, Forgejo or Gitea? Just because ATProto vibes?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959357&quot; title=&quot;[Radicle]( https://radicle.dev/ ) gets a wee bit closer. It’s selfhostable and federated. You’ll have a hard time finding something with the same social gravity well as GitHub; it remains to be seen whether that’s a separable element or if it needs to ship as part of the forge itself.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some are eager for a decentralized alternative to GitHub’s outages and social &amp;#34;moat,&amp;#34; others express concerns regarding moderation risks, corporate identity integration, and significant signup friction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48962098&quot; title=&quot;Picture this: someone “moderates” your bluesky account for some unrelated reason and you’re no longer able to manage your own source codes…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959385&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m willing to give Tangled a go too with a project, but feature set to bridge the gap still has a long way to go (no idea how long it&amp;#39;ll take). Github outages (especially when just viewing repos!) are getting way too disrupting.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959715&quot; title=&quot;First hearing of tangled, tried signing up and this first time user experience needs to be tightened up. Currently unwilling to sign in because of the friction I ran into using a password manager. From what it looks like they: - ask you for an email - send you an email - ask you for a username - except you cant actually log in with this username directly - im being forced to learn some new social url protocol - why does the auth flow pass me through a new ui/url that seems owned by the project…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959412&quot; title=&quot;https://blog.tangled.org/seed/ Similar groups to Bluesky (bain capital crypto) and some notable CEOs GitHub&amp;#39;s moat is not code hosting, they will need to build out the equivalent of Actions and figure out what private repos look like. Unclear how they intend to IAP with corporate identity systems, I have a hard time seeing ATProto break into that category.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a notable lack of public information regarding the project&amp;#39;s leadership and funding, leading to calls for more context for those unfamiliar with the platform &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959298&quot; title=&quot;This post needs a bunch more context; right now it&amp;#39;s only immediately accessible to people who don&amp;#39;t need the announcement [1]. [1] https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/curtains-for-zoosha&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959293&quot; title=&quot;I’d be interested too. Besides the fact that the company appears to be registered in Finland, I haven’t been able to find any information on who’s behind this, how they are funded, etc.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://elixir-lang.org/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Elixir-lang.org has a new design&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (elixir-lang.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959042&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;249 points · 134 comments · by bbg2401&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Elixir programming language has launched a redesigned website highlighting its scalability, reliability, and versatile applications in web development, machine learning, and embedded systems. &lt;a href=&quot;https://elixir-lang.org/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Elixir programming language    URL Source: https://elixir-lang.org/    Markdown Content:  ## Simple from zero to scale    *   Fast development with robust practices  *   Grows from solo developers to teams of hundreds  *   Scales from single servers to global networks  *   Built on decades of Erlang reliability and fault-tolerance    Composable data transformations    Output    %{&amp;#39;delightful&amp;#39; =&amp;gt; 1, &amp;#39;fun&amp;#39; =&amp;gt; 1,    &amp;#39;learn&amp;#39; =&amp;gt; 1, &amp;#39;ship&amp;#39; =&amp;gt; 1, &amp;#39;to&amp;#39; =&amp;gt; 2}    ## Why Elixir?    ### Maintenance    Elixir helps…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While users praised Elixir’s elegance and the website&amp;#39;s aesthetic, some criticized the new design for its lack of a light mode and the use of alternating high-contrast sections, which can hinder accessibility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48960130&quot; title=&quot;There’s no obvious way to switch to normal (aka “light”) mode. Dark mode is very difficult for some people (me included) to read. If you must default to dark mode that’s your choice but I’d love to see a light mode toggle somewhere prominent.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48960323&quot; title=&quot;Yeah. You&amp;#39;ll notice that there&amp;#39;s a mix of light and dark. Some segments are light-on-dark, then it switches to dark-on-light. It appears to me like a &amp;#39;design trend&amp;#39; that&amp;#39;s at odds with accessibility. https://www.apple.com does this too.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion emerged regarding the presence of AI on the landing page; while some celebrated its perceived absence, others pointed out the machine learning section and creator José Valim clarified that LLMs were used as an assistant for the copy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48960089&quot; title=&quot;No mention of AI and LLM in the front page. Life is good.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48960508&quot; title=&quot;They have a Machine Learning section on the front page. Just have to scroll down a bit, under the &amp;#39;Use Elixir for&amp;#39; section.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48961012&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think Machine Learning falls under what most people consider &amp;#39;AI&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;LLM&amp;#39; these days, even if they&amp;#39;re technically intertwined.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959936&quot; title=&quot;The Software Mansion folks designed it and we actually iterated on the designs on Figma, having discussions as humans, and exploring alternatives. They were lovely to work with. I also worked on all of the copy myself, collecting feedback from core maintainers as I went. The new tagline was a suggestion from Theo which we iterated on. I did use LLMs as an assistant, but I did not ask it to generate the content. Might as well use LLMs for the whole thing next time, since we will be accused of…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Concerns remain regarding the small job market and the need for better raw performance within the BEAM virtual machine &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48960209&quot; title=&quot;I appreciate Elixir but the problem is the job market/talent pool is tiny compared to other existing languages. If you buy into the Elixir stack then you now have constraint you could&amp;#39;ve avoided entirely by avoiding it. Also for devs there seems to be no premium offered for this talent pool scarcity. With LLMs I think language-specialists are redundant in a large scheme of things.  ex) at one of my current remote jobs, I shipped an entire telecom infrastructure with barely knowing Elixir and we…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959411&quot; title=&quot;Elixir is great. OT: I wish more funding &amp;amp; development effort went into BEAM itself on making it more performant. Note: I’m not talking concurrency. I’m talking pure raw performance. Seems like it’s been a one person show for over a decade on making it faster.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://charlesazam.com/blog/fable-5-gpt-5-6-sol-goal/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol on an NP-Hard Problem: Does /goal help?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (charlesazam.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48956879&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;255 points · 125 comments · by couAUIA&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Claude Fable 5 outperformed GPT-5.6 Sol in solving an NP-hard network optimization problem, demonstrating superior consistency and raw intelligence. While the native `/goal` mode improved median performance for both models, it also caused significant regressions, making it an unreliable default for complex optimization tasks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://charlesazam.com/blog/fable-5-gpt-5-6-sol-goal/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol on an NP-Hard Problem: Does /goal Help? - Charles AZAM    URL Source: https://charlesazam.com/blog/fable-5-gpt-5-6-sol-goal/    Markdown Content:  **TL;DR:** I gave Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol the same unpublished NP-hard optimization problem, with and without their native `/goal` mode. Fable 5 is an absolute beast; `/goal` is not a game changer.    ![Image 1: Clean score…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users report that long-term context retention remains a challenge for LLMs, with some attributing performance degradation to &amp;#34;compaction&amp;#34; processes that cause models to forget critical instructions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957842&quot; title=&quot;Claude seems to forget what you tell it in very long work sessions (things that take weeks to develop), no matter how many times you tell it which part is extra important. I dont use goal (I guess I should), but presumably it makes it actually remember the most important instruction. I believe this here is about shorter sessions where the issue doesn&amp;#39;t crop up as much.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957908&quot; title=&quot;Unfortunately I’ve used Claude and GPT models for a long time in a variety of harnesses and I agree with you and I think it’s the compaction. For some reason, codex compaction is like black magic. I’ve never felt like I can just one one continuous thread with other models, Claude I carefully curate when I compact&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some developers advocate for manual task-chunking and clearing context to maintain performance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48958143&quot; title=&quot;Compacting at all is a mistake. With 1m context window there is no reason for a single task to require compaction. Much better to spend tokens breaking the task into chunks, documenting and storing them durably, then executing each one in clean context and just /clear after. It’s a similar concept to compaction, just planned in advance. Much much more effective, and doesn’t burn tokens and time (“wall-clock”, Claude) doing the compaction.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others find that using specific commands like `/goal` or `/protect` helps the model focus on a &amp;#34;mission&amp;#34; and prevents essential requirements from being lost &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957703&quot; title=&quot;On Claude if you start with that, it won&amp;#39;t stop until it achieves or exhausts your prompt. It feels like &amp;#39;here&amp;#39;s your mission, go do it&amp;#39;. I use it a few times a week.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957498&quot; title=&quot;/goal has replaced plan mode for me. This is the pattern I use for 95% of my AI work now: 1. Read X feature of Y and tell me when you fully understand it (if there&amp;#39;s any detail missing in the summary, repeat until the context is primed) 2. What time is it? 3. /goal Spend X minutes from $time writing a technical design doc on $feature. There must not be any vague language or ambiguity in the document. Read carry_forward_requirements.md and testing_best_practices.md and explicitly incorporate…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48958064&quot; title=&quot;This is one of the advantages of pi. I made a /protect command that protects the message from compaction. I also protect skills automatically. So for long running tasks I&amp;#39;ll do /protect your goal is...&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a notable shift in preference toward tools like Codex for large-scale repository management, as some users find Anthropic’s current coding offerings slower and less efficient for complex, real-world projects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959477&quot; title=&quot;Anthropic is losing bigtime against Open AI in coding space. I was using Claude code upto last march. Not an enterprise customer, but a responsible AI user where i don&amp;#39;t over spend and use basic plan to manage repository with 400Kloc all together.  We sell to local government and a team of 3. Claude code was super slow, never able to fix issues properly.(Despite with proper test cases, observability, documentation and layered architecture). After moving to codex, life has been much easy and…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ikea.greg.technology/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: IKEA Complexity Index&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ikea.greg.technology)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48955042&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;172 points · 87 comments · by gregsadetsky&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The IKEA Complexity Index ranks products by assembly difficulty, using data such as the number of parts, instruction pages, and estimated build time to help customers understand the labor required for different furniture items. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ikea.greg.technology/&quot; title=&quot;Title: ikea complexity index    URL Source: https://ikea.greg.technology/    Markdown Content:  [PAX Corner wardrobe - dark gray dark gray/oak effect 96 5/8/71x93 1/8 &amp;#39;](https://www.ikea.com/us/en/p/pax-corner-wardrobe-dark-gray-dark-gray-oak-effect-s69607464/)s696.074.64 PAX wardrobes without doors$1,755 236 154 743 248 175,348~10.5h~4.5[16 pdfs](https://ikea.greg.technology/#)  [PAX Corner wardrobe - gray-beige gray-beige/oak effect 96 5/8/71x93 1/8…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users questioned the source of the index&amp;#39;s data, suggesting the estimated assembly times—such as 6.5 hours for a bed frame—may be AI-generated or inflated compared to real-world experience &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48955377&quot; title=&quot;Where did you pull this data from?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48955976&quot; title=&quot;I think its AI sentiment generated data, no way someone needs 6.5h for a bed frame. I needed at best 2h...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue IKEA furniture is &amp;#34;piss easy&amp;#34; to assemble, others note that complexity arises from the sheer volume of parts in large units like the PAX wardrobe or the logistical challenge of leveling and organizing dozens of boxes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48956757&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s the assembly time based on? IKEA in general is piss easy to assemble except for leveling stuff where you&amp;#39;d need a laser and often times another person. Some of provided tools (the famous L 6mm hex key made of cheese) and hardware (nails) tend to be very poor... and sometimes it&amp;#39;d need a visit to buy extra hardware - e.g. low-profile head, non-counter sunk screws to attach to the wall. Repairing furniture or addressing mistakes tend to be fixable by a mix of wood shavings/dust and epoxy…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957267&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; piss easy to assemble Sure, it’s not hard, but if there are a lot of steps it’s still going to take longer. A fully specced up pax double wardrobe with drawers, sliding doors, and lighting is made up of hundreds of parts, so does take a good amount of time to put together even though it’s not difficult per se. It’s also made up of many different SKUs so you get dozens of boxes turn up and it takes a little while to figure out what everything is and get organised. Again, it’s not difficult,…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also focused on the &amp;#34;effective price&amp;#34; of items when factoring in labor costs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957041&quot; title=&quot;Cool! I had codex have a go at calculating &amp;#39;effective price&amp;#39; on a few items, that prices in the assembly labor, and then also calculates the delta between price and effective price. Obviously very depended on how you value your time, but here are some items at $30/hour: BRIMNES storage bed + headboard, Queen   $549 + 320 min labor = $709 (delta: +$160 / +29%) HEMNES 8-drawer dresser  $380 + 236 min labor = $498 (delta: +$118 / +31%) STORKLINTA 6-drawer dresser  $250 + 224 min labor = $362 (delta:…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, the risks of using power tools on engineered wood &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48956106&quot; title=&quot;The time it takes to assemble Ikea furniture is very dependent on your experience with it, and if you&amp;#39;re using an assembly driver or not.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48956188&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; and if you&amp;#39;re using an assembly driver or not Not a good idea on modern Ikea furniture that&amp;#39;s basically engineered wood and cardboard. Way too easy to strip out the threads.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, and the trade-off between IKEA’s convenience and the superior longevity of solid wood furniture &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957103&quot; title=&quot;This is a fantastic way to quantify just how bad a consumer experience this is. Flat pack furniture tends to be very awful compared to alternatives that are also often cheaper and without assembly requirements. Everything that has come in box from a store like IKEA (or assembled in the back from a box and presented as non-flat-pack) has lasted me less than a decade. I&amp;#39;ve got a bedroom set that was built out of proper materials and it&amp;#39;s almost a century old. The thing that pushes consumers…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://negroniventurestudios.com/2026/07/18/the-computer-at-the-bottom-of-a-canal/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Computer at the Bottom of a Canal&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (negroniventurestudios.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48956231&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;173 points · 45 comments · by Kudos&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 1988 Rekursiv computer, a custom silicon project by Scottish hi-fi company Linn, pioneered hardware-level memory safety and object-oriented processing decades before such ideas became industry standards. Though killed by the rise of commodity microprocessors, its once-exotic design principles are now resurfacing in modern production silicon. &lt;a href=&quot;https://negroniventurestudios.com/2026/07/18/the-computer-at-the-bottom-of-a-canal/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The computer at the bottom of a canal    URL Source: https://negroniventurestudios.com/2026/07/18/the-computer-at-the-bottom-of-a-canal/    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1](https://negroniventurestudios.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/01-hero-canal-labelled-master-1024x574.png)  Somewhere at the bottom of the [Forth and Clyde Canal](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forth_and_Clyde_Canal), buried in the silt, there is a box of custom silicon that was right about almost everything.    Back in 1988 a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion explores the feasibility of submerged microcontrollers, with users suggesting water quality monitoring and ultrasonic signaling as potential applications &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48956824&quot; title=&quot;I wonder if you could throw a small microcontroller at the bottom of a canal, powered by water passing through a fan, to hide it. And why you would want to do that.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48956930&quot; title=&quot;Water quality monitoring. Communicate back to the surface with ultrasonic pulses.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others point out that canals lack sufficient flow for turbine power and are subject to periodic dredging &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957632&quot; title=&quot;canals have negligible water flow (except during disasters!) so I don&amp;#39;t think that&amp;#39;d work very well. They also get dredged occasionally so there&amp;#39;s a decent chance anything you leave down there won&amp;#39;t last more than a couple of years&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While one user initially compared this to &amp;#34;mud pulsing&amp;#34; in the oil industry, a correction noted that such systems actually use very low-frequency pressure waves rather than ultrasonic pulses due to the noisy environment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957968&quot; title=&quot;And in case people think ultrasonic signaling isn’t a real thing, it very much is. In the oil and gas industry, it’s how measurements taken while drilling a hole are sent back to the surface through the drilling mud.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48958882&quot; title=&quot;Downhole tools used in MWD/LWD do not use ultrasonic frequencies. Drilling is a very noisy environment. The first tool that I used employed a downhole pulser with a surface transducer and operated at about 0.5-1 Hz. That&amp;#39;s not ultrasonic. It was a pretty low frequency signal. Data transmission rates limit the volume of information that can be transmitted from the downhole tool to the surface where they are decoded. Your tool has to set up a pressure wave in the mud column that is detectable…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48961167&quot; title=&quot;Oh derp. It’s been a while since I worked adjacent to this, so I clearly misremembered some important bits. Thanks for the correction!&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, commenters debated the merits of the article&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;tagged architecture&amp;#34; subject, noting that while such designs were historically overtaken by on-chip efficiency, they remain a significant part of computing history &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48957594&quot; title=&quot;Thing is capability machines (like this and the 432 and lots of research machines) were very much the thing at the time - cutting edge even. The research literature was full of them. I did a paper design at the time. What ate them up was &amp;#39;what can you fit all on a chip with not many pins&amp;#39;, followed by &amp;#39;what can you fit along with a cache on a chip with more pins&amp;#39;, things move so much faster if everything&amp;#39;s on the same die. Tagged architectures are old, Burroughs mainframes had them back in the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48962795&quot; title=&quot;The end of the article seems to admit all of what you say but then suggest it is time to revisit; do you think that’s valid or no?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://pinewind.bearblog.dev/i-started-a-dirt-notebook/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I started a “dirt notebook”&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (pinewind.bearblog.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48954149&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;111 points · 92 comments · by herbertl&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To overcome the pressure of maintaining perfectly organized journals, a writer has started a &amp;#34;dirt notebook&amp;#34; using low-quality materials to encourage messy, unstructured scribbling and spontaneous thought. &lt;a href=&quot;https://pinewind.bearblog.dev/i-started-a-dirt-notebook/&quot; title=&quot;Title: I started a &amp;#39;dirt notebook&amp;#39;    URL Source: https://pinewind.bearblog.dev/i-started-a-dirt-notebook/    Markdown Content:  ## [PINEWIND](https://pinewind.bearblog.dev/)  [Home](https://pinewind.bearblog.dev/)[Blog](https://pinewind.bearblog.dev/blog/)[Now](https://pinewind.bearblog.dev/now/)[Shelf](https://pinewind.bearblog.dev/shelf/)    _13 Jul, 2026_    I love taking notes, but one problem that I have is that that I start cherishing every notebook that I start. I can&amp;#39;t seem to keep my notes…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on overcoming the &amp;#34;perfectionist&amp;#34; barrier of new notebooks, with many users intentionally ruining the first page &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48954329&quot; title=&quot;Whenever I get a new notebook, I immediately scribble on the front page before I have a chance to stop myself. There. It&amp;#39;s tainted and imperfect. And then I&amp;#39;ve given myself permission to make messy notes, and jot down just whatever, rather than treating it like some museum-grade archive.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt; or using loose-leaf binders and manila folders to allow for easy disposal of &amp;#34;messy&amp;#34; thoughts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48954360&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been trying binders instead of notebooks (especially the mini-binders from folks like Maruman). Binders allow you to easily remove and add pages (and tabs, dividers, etc). This gives you the satisfaction of making something aesthetically pleasing, while also knowing you can move a &amp;#39;messy&amp;#39; page somewhere else.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48954771&quot; title=&quot;Ok. Let me try to spoil you. You are looking for this https://plotterusa.com And here is a review from Fatih Arslan at https://arslan.io/2025/02/24/plotter-notebook-system/&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48955624&quot; title=&quot;my good notes have their origins in thoughts I had while in the shower or while driving or watching a movie or a conversation with someone close to me. Ideas evade me when I&amp;#39;m at my desk in front of my notebook with my awesome pen. This was a  huge problem I never noticed that my notebook is never there for me when i need it the most. the second problem, because its my original thought, I&amp;#39;m naturally attached and biased to my precious thought in that moment. The same thought could feel dumb or…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some question the need for messiness &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48955804&quot; title=&quot;But why? What&amp;#39;s wrong with a tidy notebook?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that distributed, low-friction systems—like keeping paper in every room or carrying a pocket A6 notebook—are essential for capturing fleeting insights that rarely occur at a desk &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48955624&quot; title=&quot;my good notes have their origins in thoughts I had while in the shower or while driving or watching a movie or a conversation with someone close to me. Ideas evade me when I&amp;#39;m at my desk in front of my notebook with my awesome pen. This was a  huge problem I never noticed that my notebook is never there for me when i need it the most. the second problem, because its my original thought, I&amp;#39;m naturally attached and biased to my precious thought in that moment. The same thought could feel dumb or…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48956821&quot; title=&quot;I have finally solved this for me. My system consists of two notebooks: 1. Small A6 pocket notebook which I always have on me because it fits in any pocket. Write down anything and everything in it. Bundled with a pen, leather cover,and tiny e-ink ebook reader 2. Big A4 notebook which I usually use at my desk. I used to have an A5 but since it’s not portable anyway, I might as well go with an A4 I really like this setup. There’s also a digital side to it, which consists of Obsidian for creating…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. A minor disagreement exists regarding the format: while binders offer flexibility, some note that bound notebooks are legally more reliable in court, though others find this concern irrelevant for personal use &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48955249&quot; title=&quot;Conventional wisdom is to use a bound notebook, as a court will discount reliability if pages can be removed without leaving a trace.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48956878&quot; title=&quot;Why would I care about a court? There are a hundred different issues that are more important to me than the usability of my notebook in a court proceeding. And even so, that proceeding might easily be one against you, so why would you want to produce reliable evidence against yourself?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://amigafreeware.downer.tech/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Classic Amiga titles, free to download&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (amigafreeware.downer.tech)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48962838&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;173 points · 25 comments · by doener&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Amiga Freeware Archive offers over 10 gigabytes of free downloads, featuring thousands of classic games, applications, and demos curated from historic public domain libraries, scene groups, and user group compilations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://amigafreeware.downer.tech/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Amiga Freeware Archive    URL Source: https://amigafreeware.downer.tech/    Markdown Content:  Thousands of classic Amiga titles, free to download and explore.    Search or browse games, applications, demos, graphics, music and tools from the golden age of 32-bit home computing.    What is the Amiga Freeware Archive? [Read more →](https://amigafreeware.downer.tech/about)    Browse 14 PD libraries, scene groups, disk magazines and user group compilations with 10,142 MiB of downloads    ### Popular…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The archive primarily features public domain software and &amp;#34;Fish disks,&amp;#34; which users highlight as a testament to the vital role of dedicated, non-monetized curation in building a community &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963488&quot; title=&quot;Fish disks were an incredible contribution to the Amiga community.  The impact of a dedicated and contentious curator cannot be understated. I think a lot of platforms today could be transformed if they had someone doing a similar contribution to Fred Fish. I wouldn&amp;#39;t be capable of such an effort, I think few people are, and I&amp;#39;m not sure if it can be done in any monetized way.  The motivation has to be purely for the quality of the job.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48964387&quot; title=&quot;Appears to be Public Domain games, sort of thing you&amp;#39;d get on magazine disks&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users noted the absence of certain popular commercial titles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963693&quot; title=&quot;First 2 games I tried it didn&amp;#39;t have  Lotus turbo   Buggy boy Not obscure games&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others experienced nostalgia upon finding their own early software creations within the collection &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963457&quot; title=&quot;Always fun to go and look up the very first software I sold in this archive.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48965339&quot; title=&quot;Wow this is really cool! Epic to see that it has &amp;#39;No Man&amp;#39;s Land&amp;#39; [0] and really really weird feeling to read the readme. No idea why it&amp;#39;s listed as a &amp;#39;17 Bit&amp;#39; title though, perhaps they distributed it at some point but they certainly were not involved in creating it. Source: I wrote it. Fun times. Edit: formatting. [0]: https://amigafreeware.downer.tech/17bit/17bit/1423&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. A technical debate also emerged regarding the Amiga&amp;#39;s architecture, clarifying that while the 68000 CPU utilized 32-bit internal registers, it operated on a 16-bit data bus &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48965467&quot; title=&quot;From webpage I read: &amp;#39; Search or browse games, applications, demos, graphics, music and tools from the golden age of 32-bit home computing.&amp;#39; But Amiga has a 16 bit CPU... or not?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48965502&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a bit complicated and it depends on what exactly you&amp;#39;re measuring.  The 68000 CPU has 32-bit registers internally, the address bus is 24-bit, and the data bus is 16.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48965510&quot; title=&quot;I think most Amiga’s had 32-bit registers, but a 16-bit bus. (So to everything around the CPU they were 16-bit even though internally they could do 32-bit computations)&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-07-17</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-07-17</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48945241&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AWS: Inaccurate Estimated Billing Data – $1.7 billion&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48945241&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1301 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 747 comments · by nprateem&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Amazon Web Services users are reporting a technical glitch causing massive inaccuracies in estimated billing data, with some accounts showing erroneous charges as high as $1.7 billion. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48945241&quot; title=&quot;URL already posted: &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;health.aws.amazon.com&amp;amp;#x2F;health&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;health.aws.amazon.com&amp;amp;#x2F;health&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;I&amp;amp;#x27;ve got an estimated bill for $1.7 BILLION over this month. Normal usage is &amp;amp;lt; $5.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Obvs have created an urgent AWS support ticket. Anyone else seeing something like this?&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Update: Reddit link: &amp;lt;a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The incident was caused by a unit conversion error where storage or data transfer was metered in bytes rather than gigabytes, leading to astronomical billing estimates for users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48949540&quot; title=&quot;Ive dealt with this error at AWS. It’s a unit error. In my case we _meant_ to charge like 5¢/GB, but missed the unit (GB), and then the billing system defaults to bytes. 5¢ per Byte of data transferred meant some customers were seeing MM bills within hours. Got paged by support around 2am, had it fixed and amendments issues by 3-4am, apology emails shortly after. Services emit metering values that arent directly tied to prices. Every SKU/line item is defined in  a “pricing plan”, with a unit…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48945507&quot; title=&quot;Apparently what used to be `GB of storage consumed` is confused with `Bytes of storage consumed`, leading to a cool off by 2*30 error. &amp;gt; You&amp;#39;re right to question my calculation. The MCP server failed to connect when I tried to look up the field definition. I guessed instead of validating. This is on me. But look at all the revenue!&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Affected customers reported extreme stress and &amp;#34;emotional damage&amp;#34; upon seeing charges ranging from millions to hundreds of billions of dollars, with many initially fearing their credentials had been compromised &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48945856&quot; title=&quot;I got 3 consecutive emails warning that my budget crossed its $18 threshold. Opened it up: cost was 78 million. Thought it was a phishing attempt, logged into my actual account, and... still 78 million. EMOTIONAL DAMAGE.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48945957&quot; title=&quot;same here, I am still in shock. took me 10 minutes to find the &amp;#39;operational issue&amp;#39; message in the dashboard. longest 10 minutes of my life.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48946220&quot; title=&quot;Woke up to a billing alarm email. Thought I had leaked my AWS keys accidentally and somehow run up 437 billion dollars of charges. Joke&amp;#39;s on them though, I don&amp;#39;t have 437 billion dollars Anyways I didn&amp;#39;t need coffee. That produced an adrenaline release unlike any I&amp;#39;ve experienced before. Thanks AWS&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters criticized the lack of basic anomaly detection and automated testing for such massive spikes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48949765&quot; title=&quot;No tests? Just mess up some mundane detail [1] and voila! Wake-up calls and heart attacks for 100,000s of administrators? 1: &amp;#39;Oh, well, this is not a mundane detail, Michael!&amp;#39; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fGHaVn5rGo&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48949970&quot; title=&quot;Not even tests but just some basic anomaly detection lol. Like maybe if the bill amounts increase by like 10M% there should be someone that looks into it&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, while some attributed the failure to a corporate culture that prioritizes reactive &amp;#34;heroism&amp;#34; over proactive quality assurance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48950020&quot; title=&quot;You overestimate how much people give shits at big techs like Amazon. When literally everything is driven with sticks instead of carrots, the work culture does not invite employees to proactively care about product quality. You&amp;#39;d be better off letting the heart attacks happen and take the 3am on-call and be the hero instead. It would be good promo doc material, and being a hero is extremely good insurance against getting kicked out of the country (via the PIP-&amp;gt;H1B grace period expiry mechanism).&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://localnewsmatters.org/2026/07/15/kaiser-nurses-say-ai-workplace-surveillance-are-making-their-jobs-and-patient-care-worse/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Kaiser nurses say AI, surveillance are making their jobs and patient care worse&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (localnewsmatters.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48952880&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;559 points · 376 comments · by gnabgib&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kaiser Permanente nurses report that increased workplace surveillance and AI tools, including systems that monitor call length and evaluate empathy, are compromising patient care and causing burnout as the union prepares to negotiate new contract protections against algorithmic management. &lt;a href=&quot;https://localnewsmatters.org/2026/07/15/kaiser-nurses-say-ai-workplace-surveillance-are-making-their-jobs-and-patient-care-worse/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Kaiser nurses say AI, workplace surveillance are making their jobs and patient care worse    URL Source: https://localnewsmatters.org/2026/07/15/kaiser-nurses-say-ai-workplace-surveillance-are-making-their-jobs-and-patient-care-worse/    Published Time: 2026-07-15T23:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  **KAISER PERMANENTE NURSES** who answer advice and triage calls say their duty of care for patients is being increasingly threatened by workplace surveillance.    Seven current and former nurses told…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a tension between the dehumanizing effects of workplace surveillance and the practical benefits of medical AI tools. While some argue that using machines to evaluate human empathy is a fundamental misuse of power &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48953022&quot; title=&quot;If you think using a machine to evaluate how well a human is showing empathy is a good idea, you probably shouldn&amp;#39;t have any position of power.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest that AI can serve as a useful screening tool for outliers in large-scale call centers where manual oversight is impossible &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48953099&quot; title=&quot;If you employ a few hundred nurses, how exactly would you evaluate how well they show empathy? You can&amp;#39;t rely on asking the customer. When they&amp;#39;re upset (they often are in these calls), they&amp;#39;ll lean towards the negative regardless. I don&amp;#39;t know how well these AIs evaluate, but if they&amp;#39;re even a little bit good, it makes sense to use it to screen for outliers, then have a human listen to those outliers and judge.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics point out that many complaints attributed to &amp;#34;AI&amp;#34; are actually long-standing issues with call center metrics and care rationing, noting that specific LLM tools for translation and summarization have actually improved nursing efficiency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48953663&quot; title=&quot;I RFTA and the majority of the complaints are about call center metrics and the pressure to ration care.  These are real concerns about misuse of metrics, but not AI.  The AI empathy thing was a 2024 pilot that was discontinued. FWIW my wife works for Kaiser and finds a lot of value in the the medical LLM tools available to her.  She tells me being able to do live translation, summarize notes, and quickly get comprehensive answers save her time and help her give better care.  Her older patients…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. The conversation also shifts into a broader debate over whether the corporatization of healthcare is a result of systemic political failures across both major parties &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48953499&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ma keep it creamy with you, both parties have had the kind of political majority required to clamp down on the corporatization of our society, and neither have so much as paid lip service to doing so. You want to be mad at the current administration by all means there&amp;#39;s fertile ground, but don&amp;#39;t waste anyone&amp;#39;s time blaming them for a situation that&amp;#39;s been decades in the making with both major political parties pushing in tandem to realize it.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48953155&quot; title=&quot;Maybe healthcare shouldn’t be primarily for profit?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48953732&quot; title=&quot;If you&amp;#39;re going to play the &amp;#39;both sides are the same&amp;#39; game you need to be more precise in what that means. DNC is absolutely subservient to their patrons and party leadership in general owned by the donor class. But the similarities stop there. The party platforms are in stark difference, and the GOP is now literally a cult of personality run by a mob boss. The naked corruption is off the charts. In fact right now Trump is working to cancel or refusing to acknowledge mid-term elections and acts…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48949551&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Thanks HN for 15 years of support and helping me find my life&amp;#39;s work&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48949551&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;817 points · 104 comments · by nicholasjbs&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The founder of the Recurse Center celebrates the organization&amp;#39;s 15th anniversary by thanking the Hacker News community for its pivotal role in transforming the project from a failed startup idea into a successful programming retreat that has impacted over 3,000 people. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48949551&quot; title=&quot;Tomorrow is the 15th anniversary of the first day of the Recurse Center (&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.recurse.com&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.recurse.com&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;)&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;My cofounders and I did YC all the way back in the Summer of 2010, with the initial idea of building &amp;amp;quot;OkCupid for jobs.&amp;amp;quot; That idea quickly fizzled, and we spent the better part of a year pivoting between other ideas that also failed.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Finally, we made something that we wanted ourselves: a self-directed…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Recurse Center (RC) is celebrated for its free, self-directed learning model and strong community, though participants note that the high cost of living in NYC creates a significant financial barrier for those without substantial savings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48954940&quot; title=&quot;I really like this idea, but I’m not clear how the logistics work out. It’s “free” but 1.5 - 3 months in NYC is not cheap and would mean carrying double rent for that period of time on top of living expenses. Is there financial assistance or are participants expected to cover all of their own costs? If so doesn’t that make this only accessible to those quite well off already? That is, those who can afford to take off 1.5-3 months while covering the cost of living in one of the most expensive…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48954958&quot; title=&quot;I think it&amp;#39;s more for folks who were making ~150k starting in 2012-2018. Most of them can afford to keep a place in new york and take a sabbatical.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48953409&quot; title=&quot;At first i found odd that pricing is nowhere in the website, but then i found it burried under FAQ (free!) - is it to weed out people who are focusing on free rather than going deeper into the experience? &amp;gt; How much does attending the Recurse Center cost?  &amp;gt; RC is free for everyone. You will never receive a bill from RC. &amp;gt; How can you afford to make RC free?  &amp;gt; RC has a built in recruiting agency. Companies pay to hire RC alumni. This payment never comes out of your salary.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While many find the environment highly motivating, some attendees felt like &amp;#34;outsiders&amp;#34; due to a perceived &amp;#34;mini-cult&amp;#34; atmosphere, competitive project sharing, and the difficulties of adjusting to New York’s urban environment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48953026&quot; title=&quot;I attended a Recurse Center batch, and while I understand that others had amazing experiences, mine was quite bland. I can&amp;#39;t blame anyone but myself for this. Most of the other attendees were intelligent or highly self-motivated, or both. Many people seemed to connect instantly, forming small work groups, sharing project ideas, and even going out for lunch or dinner together. They were constantly talking about how awesome Zulip was (is?) [*] and engaged in a constant stick-measuring contest to…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussions also touched on the evolution of programming culture over the last 15 years and the specific social rules designed to maintain RC’s unique collaborative space &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48952540&quot; title=&quot;I like the definition of social rules [0]. I also wonder whether the roof rule was written preemptively or retrospectively -- I hope the former. I have my own thanks to give to HN. It&amp;#39;s connected me to interesting people, online and IRL. It&amp;#39;s led to some very strong friendships. It&amp;#39;s led me to multiple job opportunities, and usually the better ones. It&amp;#39;s changing of course, but I&amp;#39;ve had a great time in this community so far, and that deserves thanks. 0: https://www.recurse.com/social-rules&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48954230&quot; title=&quot;Congrats! I&amp;#39;d be curious to hear what changed (and what didn&amp;#39;t) with applicants over the last 15 years. I feel like the programming community is very different than in the early 2010s – when&amp;#39;s the last time you&amp;#39;ve seen a coworker brag about using vim – but I can&amp;#39;t really put my finger on what changed exactly.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stateofopensource.ai/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The state of open source AI&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (stateofopensource.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48947825&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;483 points · 355 comments · by rellem&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mozilla’s 2026 report highlights that open-source AI has reached functional parity with closed models, driving a shift toward &amp;#34;sovereign&amp;#34; self-hosting and agentic frameworks to avoid vendor lock-in and metered token costs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stateofopensource.ai/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The State of Open Source AI — V1.0 · July 2026    URL Source: https://stateofopensource.ai/    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: Mozilla](https://stateofopensource.ai/assets/img/moz-logo.png)    V1.0 · Recurring · July 2026    A Letter From Our CTO, Raffi Krikorian“    In New Zealand&amp;#39;s far north, a Māori broadcaster trains speech models for te reo — a language too small for any market — under a license that keeps the data with its people. PwC, one of the largest accounting firms in the world,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of open-weight models is seen by some as a potential &amp;#34;existential threat&amp;#34; to frontier labs like OpenAI, as the performance gap narrows and usage shifts toward open alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48948110&quot; title=&quot;Speculation: open models is what will kill Anthropic and OpenAI. Hyperscalers can run the models without a licensing fee. Apple can make them smaller and put them on the device. The frontier models are an edge and a liability. They&amp;#39;re astronomically expensive to train. Without them, their models will fade into obscurity. Their marketing depends on people believing the models are meaningfully different, as people have sweatily argued on this forum. Personally, I&amp;#39;m not convinced there&amp;#39;s much of a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48948846&quot; title=&quot;Exactly 4 months ago, the marketshare on openrouter was 60%-40% in favor of closed models. Now it&amp;#39;s 63%-37% in favor of open models. On March 19th, the open models processed 888B tokens in aggregate, yesterday, they processed 4.19T tokens in aggregate. That&amp;#39;s almost 5x in 4 months! I can&amp;#39;t think of the right intensifier to describe this level of growth. If you are looking for more details (as inferred by openrouter data), I built a dashboard that updates daily:…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, skeptics argue that the astronomical costs of training and hardware may make the open-source strategy financially unsustainable once corporate &amp;#34;largesse&amp;#34; or tactical geopolitical interests fade &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48948529&quot; title=&quot;Open models are probably also comparatively astronomically expensive to train - just less so than the frontier models because they’re somewhat smaller, +/- the creators are more incentivised to focus on getting more from less compute because they’re have to, +/- they rely on distillation of the frontier models and this is more efficient. But efficiencies aside; creation of open models still requires a lot of money and compute from a large organisation which is willing to accept zero return for…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48950354&quot; title=&quot;The outcome is plausible. Open weights models though look like a tactical more than a principled play by Chinese companies to overcome the disadvantage and difficulties to access western markets. Two issues: 1. If market conditions change they might decide to close down like Meta did. 2. If as you said models keep getting more expensive to train, is an open weights strategy financially sustainable? edit: typo&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48949818&quot; title=&quot;My prediction is that hardware costs will make open source models impractical for the foreseeable future. Yes, tinkerers and enthusiasts will continue to make use of them, but frontier companies will maintain near total dominance because they will be the only ones with access to the hardware.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some believe &amp;#34;product taste&amp;#34; and integration will keep proprietary models dominant &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48948772&quot; title=&quot;Even in the world where all models are basically equivalent (a thesis I don’t buy, but will grant you for arguments sake) - I believe there is much more to the AI business than just training and running models. It’s a very new set of technologies, and understanding what is useful to customers and what isn’t is the whole game. Call it, product taste. There were a million cell phones before the iPhone took over the world. Why iPhone? Product taste. There are a million startups, and only a select…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others point to the historical precedent of Android to suggest that open models will eventually capture the majority of the market share &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48948886&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;There were a million cell phones before the iPhone took over the world. You have tripped yourself up there. iPhone took over as it introduced something innovative over standard phones, but then Open Source (Android) matched the multi-touch and software differences and Apple&amp;#39;s branding, lock-in and design etc have managed to keep it as a big player in wealthier countries. IPhone  also came on the back of the massive iPod success. ChatGPT launched the same innovation vs Google Search, but just…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy4kdd1e0ejo&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;First atmosphere found on Earth-like planet in habitable zone of distant star&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48947560&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;531 points · 306 comments · by neversaydie&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Astronomers have discovered the first atmosphere around a rocky, Earth-like planet called LHS 1140b, which orbits within the habitable zone of a star 48 light-years away. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy4kdd1e0ejo&quot; title=&quot;Title: First atmosphere found around Earth-like planet LHS 1140b    URL Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy4kdd1e0ejo    Published Time: 2026-07-17T12:58:37.474Z    Markdown Content:  ## First atmosphere found on Earth-like planet in habitable zone of distant star    17 hours ago    ![Image 1: Pallab Ghosh profile image](https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/480/cpsprodpb/389a/live/ad9822a0-81d2-11f1-926f-c90d1bcfbc84.jpg.webp)    Pallab Ghosh Science Correspondent    ![Image 2: Melissa Weiss/Center for…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discovery of an atmosphere on a nearby Earth-like planet has sparked debate over whether humanity should pursue long-term interstellar probes or focus on advanced imaging like solar lens telescopes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48947996&quot; title=&quot;48 light years is in our back yard. Close enough that we could probably develop a probe to get there in the next few centuries and check it out.  What are the current popular candidates for propulsion systems capable of accelerating to near the speed of light?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48948374&quot; title=&quot;We should build a solar lens telescope. By the time we&amp;#39;re ready to use it, we&amp;#39;ll have a bunch of candidates to point it at.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48948666&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s a project that&amp;#39;s going well from NASA for this. Still a moonshot but they&amp;#39;ve progressed through the early stages well so far. https://www.nasa.gov/general/direct-multipixel-imaging-and-s...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find the prospect of a 750-year mission &amp;#34;haunting and beautiful&amp;#34; or a worthy challenge, others argue that such timescales are &amp;#34;horrifically long&amp;#34; for human civilization and rely on propulsion technologies that remain purely speculative &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48948335&quot; title=&quot;Probably more likely that we work out how to fold spacetime than we get there in anything like a high enough percentage of the speed of light - the fastest object we ever made travelled at something like ~0.064% * C so we are looking at ~750 years with current technology and presumably we&amp;#39;d need to switch on the probe in 3/4 of a millennium and figure out how to slow it down and get it into some sort of orbit around the planet. 750 years is hard for me to get excited about even as a vampire.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48948369&quot; title=&quot;Honestly a near millennia long expedition would be very cool, and doesn’t seem too long on the scale of space stuff.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48949012&quot; title=&quot;I wonder about all the extraterrestrial AI swarms that have already imaged earth. Surely it has happened. They must have all spotted our planet millions of years ago and must be watching us with a continuous high-resolution feed. They&amp;#39;ve seen our dinosaurs. Their interest will really be piqued when they finally see us invent electricity, though that might be some time in the future for them. Perhaps even gravitational lensing is primitive to them. Perhaps they&amp;#39;re able to break and manipulate…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48948473&quot; title=&quot;Perhaps, but it is horrifically long in terms of human stuff.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant point of contention exists between those who enjoy theorizing about FTL travel and critics who believe science fiction has created unrealistic &amp;#34;fantasies&amp;#34; that distract from projects achievable with known physics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48949071&quot; title=&quot;It’s highly unlikely we’re ever getting FTL. We should become comfortable with that and let go our fantasies. Let theoretical physicists chug away at this, we should get underway with projects that are possible with known science.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48951337&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m always so alienated (sorry) by the excitement around things like this. People start fantasizing about FTL and space arks and there is just no evidence that any of that is possible, desirable, effective, anything really. I know I&amp;#39;m a killjoy, but I do think there&amp;#39;s something negative about the impact of science fiction on engineers. Like, the people who tend (no offense) to be the most literal, black and white thinkers get exposed to art and instead of processing it as the output of human…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ft.com/content/1b8c9d52-88a9-426b-ba47-f1811f859166&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apple targets dozens of OpenAI employees with legal letters&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ft.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48946303&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;410 points · 375 comments · by merksittich&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple has sent legal letters to dozens of OpenAI employees as part of an escalating dispute between the two technology companies. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ft.com/content/1b8c9d52-88a9-426b-ba47-f1811f859166&quot; title=&quot;Title: Apple targets dozens of OpenAI employees with legal letters    URL Source: https://www.ft.com/content/1b8c9d52-88a9-426b-ba47-f1811f859166    Published Time: 2026-07-17T10:00:05.476Z    Markdown Content:  [Accessibility help](https://www.ft.com/accessibility)[Skip to navigation](https://www.ft.com/content/1b8c9d52-88a9-426b-ba47-f1811f859166#site-navigation)[Skip to main content](https://www.ft.com/content/1b8c9d52-88a9-426b-ba47-f1811f859166#site-content)[Skip to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple&amp;#39;s legal action against former employees at OpenAI has sparked debate over whether the company has hard evidence of intellectual property theft or is simply using standard document retention letters as an aggressive escalation tactic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48946775&quot; title=&quot;Apple must have hard evidence on this. I can’t believe they would take it this far without already knowing they are going to win. If they have to fire a huge chunk of their hardware employees it’s going to throw their IPO plans into chaos.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48946717&quot; title=&quot;FT frames this as some aggressive escalation tactic, but document retention letters are extremely standard practice.  At this point they&amp;#39;re basically a formality, as any former Apple employee at OpenAI really ought to know by now that they could get dragged into this.  Hold letters can be aggressive if you send them before you&amp;#39;ve even filed a complaint, but if anything, Apple is late to the party with these.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Some commenters view OpenAI’s massive investment in hardware as a high-stakes gamble that may have been compromised by an &amp;#34;arrogant&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;loose&amp;#34; ethical culture regarding Apple&amp;#39;s proprietary information &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48948056&quot; title=&quot;Everybody wants a platform but nobody wants to spend what it takes to make a platform. That includes things like Windows Phone, Fire Phone, all the glasses, Humane, etc. As much as everybody hates on OpenAI for chaotic management, they did buy Jony Ive and are presumably giving him everything he wants to build a platform for them. Even though it probably only buys them a 20% chance of success, they haven&amp;#39;t doomed the project by underestimating what it takes budget-wise. And they blew it. Maybe…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48946702&quot; title=&quot;How can I say this…? Some companies come across like a neon sign flashing &amp;#39;EVIL!&amp;#39;. It&amp;#39;s been nothing but warning signs from this company for at least a year now. I&amp;#39;m so happy to have nothing to do with them (having deleted my account a year or so ago). Their marketing dept is going to have to really dig to get them out of this hole they&amp;#39;ve made for themselves. The idea that I would trust any device they might roll out that is as personal as a personal AI assistant… It&amp;#39;s no better than Meta and…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Meanwhile, critics argue that Apple’s legal maneuvering signals a &amp;#34;pathetic&amp;#34; inability to compete in the AI frontier, highlighting a decade of neglect toward Siri as evidence of their declining innovation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48946822&quot; title=&quot;I’m a huge fan of Apple but this kind of thing leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Regardless of whether OpenAI poached some of their talent or is the one in the wrong, Apple has such a massively dominant hardware business (some might say monopoly level in some areas) that for them to be publicly acknowledging how scared they are of OpenAI…it’s just…pathetic. They’re a $5T company and can’t muster up the motivation to get in the game and compete in the next computing frontier. Apple fanboys will…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/kaggle-measuring-agi/discussion/724918#3498423&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Evidence of inconsistencies in evaluation process and selection of winners&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (kaggle.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48946010&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;469 points · 298 comments · by twerkmeister&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kaggle and Google DeepMind announced the winners of the &amp;#34;Measuring Progress Toward AGI&amp;#34; hackathon, awarding $25,000 grand prizes to benchmarks focusing on metacognition and in-context learning. However, the results sparked community backlash, with participants alleging judging inconsistencies, lack of transparency, and technical flaws in the winning submissions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/kaggle-measuring-agi/discussion/724918#3498423&quot; title=&quot;Title: Measuring Progress Toward AGI - Cognitive Abilities    URL Source: https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/kaggle-measuring-agi/discussion/724918    Markdown Content:  menu    [Skip to content](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/kaggle-measuring-agi/discussion/724918#site-content)    [![Image 1: Kaggle](https://www.kaggle.com/static/images/site-logo.svg)](https://www.kaggle.com/)    Create    search​    *   [explore Home](https://www.kaggle.com/)     *   [emoji_events…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a growing frustration with the &amp;#34;blind&amp;#34; adoption of AI in evaluation processes, with users suggesting that platforms like Kaggle may be outsourcing common sense to algorithms that lack human judgment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48946435&quot; title=&quot;AI is useful. But the amount of people that are simply offloading all of their thinking to AI and blindly accepting the answer is absurd. Kaggle is most likely using ai to assess the submissions and are not using any common sense by blindly accepting the results.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48946425&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know about this exact competition but overall fair hackathons have been killed by AI. It all seems fine from the outside but all the code is generated in all the projects and judging happens via AI, I have seen projects win because they prompt inject that they are the winners. It used to be about human skill, now it&amp;#39;s about ideas and of course insiders are the main winners.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue AI is &amp;#34;95% useless&amp;#34; or merely produces &amp;#34;more crap, faster,&amp;#34; others contend it is a transformative tool for automating &amp;#34;chores&amp;#34; and specific industry workflows &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48946142&quot; title=&quot;AI is 95% useless. Not quite worth the trillion dollar market cap lol. * The AI bots are downvoting me * hooray&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48946202&quot; title=&quot;AI is extremely useful, we just haven’t zeroed in on your specific use cases yet. Robotics has been transformed by it, IT and tech has been transformed by it. Finance and Legal have been transformed by it. To say it’s 95% useless is a personal bias. To me it’s 65% useful. As it can run in the background doing “chores” while I sleep.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48946366&quot; title=&quot;People&amp;#39;s workday has been transformed by it.  But I fail to see actual transformation beyond &amp;#39;more crap, faster.&amp;#39; AI hasn&amp;#39;t done anything we couldn&amp;#39;t already do. It&amp;#39;s just doing it faster and with more mistakes.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. A central theme is that systemic pressures—such as management’s obsession with speed over correctness and a &amp;#34;move fast&amp;#34; culture—force workers to offload their thinking to AI to meet unrealistic deadlines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48946463&quot; title=&quot;I think we need to address the underlying causes of people outsourcing their thinking like that. And a big contribution is “move fast.” No one has time to read, process, and think, because The Powers That Be (capital) want their results now.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48946623&quot; title=&quot;With the exception of _one_ company that I worked at, pretty much every[0] company was a struggle between engineering and management. Engineering wants to get the software correct, and management wants to fire-hose features into the market. Most of the time (so more than half, at least), management tends to have a compulsion to mindlessly imitate what other companies/competitors are doing, usually without prioritization (so even if feature-parity is a good idea, usually management will want to…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48946559&quot; title=&quot;Pragmatically speaking, a half-assed answer now, is often better than a perfect answer tomorrow.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, critics note that hackathons and competitions are being undermined by AI-generated submissions and prompt-injected judging, shifting the focus from human skill to insider advantage and hype &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48946425&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know about this exact competition but overall fair hackathons have been killed by AI. It all seems fine from the outside but all the code is generated in all the projects and judging happens via AI, I have seen projects win because they prompt inject that they are the winners. It used to be about human skill, now it&amp;#39;s about ideas and of course insiders are the main winners.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48946797&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It very frequently feels like management is making strategic decisions after snorting a long line of social-media-psychosis and TED talks. It is remarkable that investors have any faith in such founders/entrepreneurs at all. My guess is the causality is usually * the managers are pursuing things because their investors (/government ministries) hinted it was the future after snorting a line of &amp;#39;TED talks&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;social-media&amp;#39;. Irony is, I really do mean &amp;#39;hinted&amp;#39;, it can be a sycophantic/fawning…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jul/16/kimi-k3/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Kimi K3, and what we can still learn from the pelican benchmark&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (simonwillison.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48947717&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;402 points · 217 comments · by droidjj&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moonshot AI has released Kimi K3, a 2.8 trillion-parameter model that rivals top-tier competitors like GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8 in benchmarks. While significantly more expensive than its predecessors, the model demonstrates strong reasoning capabilities and high performance in frontend coding and vision tasks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jul/16/kimi-k3/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Kimi K3, and what we can still learn from the pelican benchmark    URL Source: https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jul/16/kimi-k3/    Markdown Content:  16th July 2026    Chinese AI lab Moonshot AI [announced Kimi K3](https://www.kimi.com/blog/kimi-k3) this morning, describing it as their “most capable model to date, with 2.8 trillion parameters”. It’s currently available via their website and API, but an open weight release is promised “by July 27, 2026”.    Moonshot are calling this the first “open…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether the &amp;#34;pelican on a bicycle&amp;#34; benchmark has been compromised by training data contamination, with some arguing that the models&amp;#39; uniform rendering styles and improved recognition suggest they have internalized the specific prompt from the web &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48949300&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s incredible Simon still believes pelicans on bikes aren&amp;#39;t part of the training set, despite hundreds of them on blogs, forums, and Github. Stuff we put in our company blog shows up known by LLMs 6 months later, and we have 1000x less traffic than Simon&amp;#39;s own website&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48950883&quot; title=&quot;Respectfully, the pelicans used to be an unrecognisable mess and now they’re unquestionably pelicans on bicycles, rendered poorly, from every model. In the same timescale, model capabilities across the board have only meaningfully improved in places where the labs are focusing their training efforts. Moreover, they have a uniform style, even though your prompt doesn’t ask for one. There&amp;#39;s no model going rogue and producing a watercolour of a pelican. They’re all rendered in an approximately…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While Simon Willison initially doubted this, he acknowledges that consistent biases in color and direction across different models may indicate a shared training influence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48950686&quot; title=&quot;The pelicans are still all rubbish. If they make it into the training set it doesn&amp;#39;t help the models produce better pelicans, if anything it will make them perform worse!&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48950994&quot; title=&quot;You know what, that&amp;#39;s actually something I hadn&amp;#39;t considered before. There&amp;#39;s definitely a bias towards a pelican cycling from left to right on a red bicycle against a blue sky and green grass. Blue sky and green grass aren&amp;#39;t that surprising, but the color and direction are interesting. When I finally build the proper gallery I&amp;#39;ll throw in a few other creature-vehicle combinations, and track some characteristics like which direction, color of bicycle, general pelican geometry etc. It will be…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, commenters debated the cost-effectiveness of AI versus human labor and questioned how Chinese labs are achieving high parameter counts despite potential compute constraints &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48949257&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This is expensive—the pelican cost 25 cents! Engineers get unbelievably silly about evaluating costs of things. &amp;#39;The tokens are so expensive!&amp;#39; Oh my sweet child, how much would even the least capable human effort cost? This is what the executives properly understand that the programmers don&amp;#39;t.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48950134&quot; title=&quot;I wonder how the Chinese labs are training a 3 trillion parameter model on what has to be vastly smaller compute resources. If the U.S. compute advantage is persistent, it&amp;#39;s hard to imagine that Chinese labs will be able to keep pace forever, as a matter of physics, but... so far they seem to be doing just fine.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48950616&quot; title=&quot;3T is impressive, but parameter count seems to be less important than I thought. GLM is half the size of DeepSeek but costs four times as much, and beats it on every benchmark. I&amp;#39;m not an expert on this stuff but it seems to be the attention mechanism. DeepSeek were bragging about how cheap they made it. But if you cut costs on attention you get worse results with way more parameters. If I had to guess it seems to be the difference between memory (params) and intelligence (attention density). I…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://pydantic.dev/articles/the-human-in-the-loop-is-tired&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The human-in-the-loop is tired&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (pydantic.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48942000&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;313 points · 200 comments · by haritha1313&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While LLMs have significantly increased coding productivity, they have also created a &amp;#34;fatigue of supervision&amp;#34; by replacing the rewarding aspects of manual programming with the exhausting cognitive load of constant review and course correction. &lt;a href=&quot;https://pydantic.dev/articles/the-human-in-the-loop-is-tired&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Human-in-the-Loop is Tired    URL Source: https://pydantic.dev/articles/the-human-in-the-loop-is-tired    Published Time: 2026-02-18T09:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  Yet another thought piece about LLMs. I know. Bear with me.    This is an attempt to put words around something I think most developers are experiencing right now but haven&amp;#39;t had time to make sense of. **Programming with LLMs is genuinely useful and genuinely destabilizing. These two things coexist. If we pretend the second…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The shift toward LLM-assisted programming has created a &amp;#34;human reward function problem,&amp;#34; where the satisfying dopamine hits of solving logic puzzles and hand-coding are replaced by the exhausting cognitive load of constant supervision &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48943090&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Here&amp;#39;s a term for what I think is happening: the human reward function problem. In machine learning, a reward function tells an agent what good looks like. Writing code by hand was never easy, but it was full of small rewards. Solving a problem in your head. Understanding a gnarly bit of logic. Watching the code compile. The feeling of control. LLM-assisted programming has automated much of the work that generated those dopamine hits and replaced it with the cognitive load of review and…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48943642&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; but I get that feeling more often as features are not only easier to create, but also come out more polished and consistent. Features might be easier to create, but I rarely ever get the feeling of I did that anymore from writing software. &amp;#39;I told the LLM to do that&amp;#39; is different and far less satisfying for me.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48945248&quot; title=&quot;You don&amp;#39;t understand what the OP said, your brain can get a intrinsic reward from seeing users use your LLM work. But LLM remove all the little intrinsic rewards from coding elegant systems to get to the point where you see users using your work. It is all about the destination now where it used to be about the journey and the destination.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some developers find new fulfillment in increased productivity, polished results, and focusing on user needs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48943811&quot; title=&quot;I think it all depends on your personal driver: personally I rather see a product I built in whatever way used by ever growing number of people because they find it useful. It means that the time I spent working on that helped other people solving a problem (hopefully). That’s why a was always keen on cutting some corners when and where necessary in order to think about the user first and the code beauty second. Of course I appreciate well structured and maintainable code but you can always…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48943251&quot; title=&quot;Maybe it&amp;#39;s different between professional and personal projects, but I get that feeling more often as features are not only easier to create, but also come out more polished and consistent. I&amp;#39;m able to focus on a single project for a month and have something pretty good by the end. Doing rewrites to clean up and reorganize has never been easier, so I get to see and feel more of the design space in action. The can be pretty damn frustrating at times, half of which is me/context, the other their…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48945167&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Better to find joy in other parts of the process! I recommend the joy of helping the customer get what they truly want. Spend more time on client calls and intercept additional hot potatoes now that we have extra free time to work with. The technology is a blank canvas. These LLMs are like 600DPI color laser printers. The customer cannot tell the difference between hand painted and LLM generated at even a short distance. Once you get your head out of the worry that not hand painting…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that the &amp;#34;journey&amp;#34; of coding has been lost to a purely destination-oriented process &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48945248&quot; title=&quot;You don&amp;#39;t understand what the OP said, your brain can get a intrinsic reward from seeing users use your LLM work. But LLM remove all the little intrinsic rewards from coding elegant systems to get to the point where you see users using your work. It is all about the destination now where it used to be about the journey and the destination.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. To mitigate this fatigue, some suggest staying deeply engaged in the step-by-step generation process rather than delegating entirely to autonomous agents &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48942719&quot; title=&quot;unlike the op, I&amp;#39;ve been having a wonderful time using claude, both at work and for my own personal projects, so I will share what has worked for me, just in case it resonates with anyone else. my anecdotal advice is to avoid the entire &amp;#39;agent&amp;#39; temptation, and treat the LLM as a code generator. have a single session running at a time. come up with a plan, iterate on it until you are satisfied, then tell it to execute the plan, and watch it . not necessarily to the extent of reading the scroll…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, or finding joy in higher-level product lifecycle and customer satisfaction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48944887&quot; title=&quot;We&amp;#39;re just getting used to the invention of the washing machine. All clothes are equally cleansed on average, with good enough results even if afterwards some particular pieces need a bit of extra care, while before we had to clean them all one by one and paying attention to minutia and details on each piece&amp;#39;s needs. Nowadays you just control a couple buttons and hope for the best. Better to find joy in other parts of the process! Hanging clothes out is still a widespread practice in Europe,…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48945167&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Better to find joy in other parts of the process! I recommend the joy of helping the customer get what they truly want. Spend more time on client calls and intercept additional hot potatoes now that we have extra free time to work with. The technology is a blank canvas. These LLMs are like 600DPI color laser printers. The customer cannot tell the difference between hand painted and LLM generated at even a short distance. Once you get your head out of the worry that not hand painting…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/attorney-general-ken-paxton-secures-landmark-legal-victory-lock-pornographic-website-domain-and&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Texas wins court order to suspend domain name for violating age-verification law&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (texasattorneygeneral.gov)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48952939&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;198 points · &lt;strong&gt;302 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by letmevoteplease&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton secured a court order to lock the domain name of motherless.com after its owner, Kick Online Entertainment, failed to comply with state age-verification laws and previous court injunctions regarding pornographic content. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/attorney-general-ken-paxton-secures-landmark-legal-victory-lock-pornographic-website-domain-and&quot; title=&quot;Title: Attorney General Ken Paxton Secures Landmark Legal Victory to Lock Pornographic Website Domain and Protect Minors From Harmful Content    URL Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/attorney-general-ken-paxton-secures-landmark-legal-victory-lock-pornographic-website-domain-and    Published Time: Sat, 18 Jul 2026 00:05:00 GMT    Markdown Content:  July 01, 2026 | Press Release    ## Attor­ney Gen­er­al Ken Pax­ton Secures Land­mark Legal Vic­to­ry to Lock Porno­graph­ic Web­site…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are deeply concerned that a Texas state court order to suspend a domain name sets a dangerous precedent for regional censorship, allowing local jurisdictions to &amp;#34;nuke&amp;#34; parts of the global internet &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48953436&quot; title=&quot;I don’t understand - was this site or company based in Texas? Otherwise the general idea seems absurd that an individual state could freeze a domain impacting for the whole Internet… (EDIT: I won’t lose any sleep at the loss of such scum but the general principle seems a bit strange.)&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48953871&quot; title=&quot;The idea that a state court in one particular state can enforce such an absurd law against a company that likely has no business operations or servers in the state is ridiculous. I don&amp;#39;t care if you like the porn site in question or not, or condone or endorse its content. This is a slippery slope towards every regional tinpot dictator legislature attempting to censor the internet by having an entity&amp;#39;s domain name revoked. .com in particular has also been well proven over the past 5 to 10 years…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48953751&quot; title=&quot;So a state (or municipality or anyone capable of making laws) has the ability to say, &amp;#39;You don&amp;#39;t meet our local laws, take down your URL&amp;#39; now? This is going to be a real problem when states start nuking whole parts of the internet from orbit. A state has a law against conversion therapy and starts to remove sites with that? A state has a law against trans people? Or abortion? Or medical misinformation? Suddenly we just start purging sites back and forth? Battlegrounds end up as torn up, muddy,…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that serving Texas users grants the state jurisdiction over &amp;#34;harmful&amp;#34; content &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48953471&quot; title=&quot;It operates in Texas if it is serving Texas users. &amp;gt; Kick Online, which openly describes itself as a “moral free” company, ignored the lawsuit and refused to comply with the court’s order. It continued publishing and distributing harmful sexual material that was accessible to minors in Texas. This is the same website with a forum with millions of users trading information on how to assault their partner. https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2026/03/world/expose-rape-as... FAFO.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that this differs from the GDPR because it removes global access rather than just blocking local traffic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48954048&quot; title=&quot;The GDPR doesn&amp;#39;t try to remove anything from the global internet. You&amp;#39;re free to not serve your site in the EU. Texas is free to block sites in Texas. But Texas trying to remove the ability of Europeans to access European websites is a completely different matter.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics warn this &amp;#34;slippery slope&amp;#34; could lead to a fragmented internet where states weaponize domain registries to enforce conflicting laws on abortion, medical information, or firearms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48953751&quot; title=&quot;So a state (or municipality or anyone capable of making laws) has the ability to say, &amp;#39;You don&amp;#39;t meet our local laws, take down your URL&amp;#39; now? This is going to be a real problem when states start nuking whole parts of the internet from orbit. A state has a law against conversion therapy and starts to remove sites with that? A state has a law against trans people? Or abortion? Or medical misinformation? Suddenly we just start purging sites back and forth? Battlegrounds end up as torn up, muddy,…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48954450&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The idea that a state court in one particular state can enforce such an absurd law against a company that likely has no business operations or servers in the state is ridiculous. I agree.  California has been doing this since 2022 [1][2] and it&amp;#39;s equally indefensible. States should not be allowed to wield their size and influence as a cudgel against other states and jurisdictions. [1] https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtm... [2]…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48954504&quot; title=&quot;Interestingly if you browse American-hosted online internet firearms accessories websites (and FFLs who will sell you something online to ship to your local FFL), for the most part, it&amp;#39;s just a basic HTML popup of &amp;#39;Are you over 18? Click Yes, okay, proceed&amp;#39;. I haven&amp;#39;t seen a single one that actually attempts to implement age verification. It seems that the Internet-based vendors, the same general cohort of companies that are exhibitors or attendees at the annual SHOT trade show, are not very…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/how-has-roman-concrete-lasted-for-millennia-a-1900-year-old-latrine-offers-new-clues-about-the-materials-impressive-durability-180989115/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How Has Roman Concrete Lasted for Millennia? 1,900-Year-Old Latrine Offers Clues&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (smithsonianmag.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48943142&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;273 points · 218 comments · by divbzero&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Researchers studying a 1,900-year-old Roman latrine discovered that a chemical process called carbonation creates calcite to seal cracks, a finding that explains the material&amp;#39;s extreme durability and could lead to more sustainable modern building materials. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/how-has-roman-concrete-lasted-for-millennia-a-1900-year-old-latrine-offers-new-clues-about-the-materials-impressive-durability-180989115/&quot; title=&quot;How Has Roman Concrete Lasted for Millennia? A 1,900-Year-Old Latrine Offers New Clues About the Material&amp;#39;s Impressive Durability    A chemical process called carbonation, which helps seal cracks, could help explain why many ancient Roman structures are still standing today. Researchers hope that the insights will lead to better modern-day building materials    [Skip to main content](#main-content)    [![Smithsonian Magazine white…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The longevity of Roman concrete is attributed to the &amp;#34;lime cycle,&amp;#34; which allows the material to self-heal and strengthen over time through carbonation and pozzolanic reactions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48943587&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It turns out that another chemical reaction, known as carbonation, might also contribute to Roman concrete’s longevity. Roman concrete was made lime cement (calcium dioxide); which cures via carbonation (hardens with carbon oxide). And adding pozzolan to lime makes it hydrolic (hardens with water). Is it surprising that it can still carbonate some? Modern concrete has steel which rust and crack concrete. You can use fiberglass rebar for longevity, or build without rebar even, but that is more…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48944888&quot; title=&quot;For those not familiar, the secret ingredients are to do with the Lime Cycle [1]: 1) Quicklime/Slakedlime (Calcium Oxide, CaO) 2) Lime (Calcium Hydroxide, CaOH2) 3) Limestone (Calcium Carbonate, CaCO3) To keep it simple, typically you start with Quicklime (CaO) and after construction you end up with some mix of all three and after hundreds of years, the masonry transitions to mostly Limestone with microscopic traces of the other two. The slow transition of the lime cycle upon exposure of the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While modern concrete is chemically advanced, its lifespan is often limited by the corrosion of internal steel rebar, a vulnerability that can be mitigated by using expensive stainless steel or fiberglass alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48943587&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It turns out that another chemical reaction, known as carbonation, might also contribute to Roman concrete’s longevity. Roman concrete was made lime cement (calcium dioxide); which cures via carbonation (hardens with carbon oxide). And adding pozzolan to lime makes it hydrolic (hardens with water). Is it surprising that it can still carbonate some? Modern concrete has steel which rust and crack concrete. You can use fiberglass rebar for longevity, or build without rebar even, but that is more…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48944256&quot; title=&quot;Stainless steel rebar is a thing. It&amp;#39;s expensive, but structures built with it last much longer. Washington State now has a policy that bridges over salt water will be built with stainless steel rebar. Stainless steel costs much more, but total project cost goes up less than 10%. Epoxy coated rebar looked promising for a while, but it&amp;#39;s on the way out. Water gets in at cuts and joints. So all field joints have to have field patching. There is a great comparison. Two piers were built in the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48943653&quot; title=&quot;As I understand it, concrete has excellent resistance to compression but fails easily on traction, while steel bars are exactly the opposite. That is why you put rebar in concrete: the steel handles the traction loads and the concrete handles the compression.  This works well because both materials have similar coefficients of thermal expansion, so as the temperature changes they both expand and contract at the same rate. I suppose you can engineer fiberglass to have the same thermal expansion…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, the discussion suggests that modern structures fail sooner due to economic efficiency; engineers prioritize lower upfront costs and shorter design lifespans over the &amp;#34;narcissistic&amp;#34; immortality of ancient Roman infrastructure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48943516&quot; title=&quot;Related, Grady Hillhouse on the myth of Roman concrete. &amp;gt; The miracle of modern chemistry has given us a wide variety of admixtures like superplasticizers to improve the characteristics of concrete beyond a Roman engineer’s wildest dreams. So why does it seem that our concrete doesn’t last nearly as long as it should? It’s a complicated question, but one answer is economics. There’s a famous quote that says “Anyone can design a bridge that stands. It takes an engineer to build one that barely…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48943687&quot; title=&quot;The whole promise of engineering is not to build a bridge that stands but to build a bridge that barely stands. It is not a good idea to build a bridge that last 500 years. You likely destroyed valuable resources to build one. Build a bridge that lasts 100 years and save those resources. In 100 years the technology to build bridges improves so much that it is lot easier to build a new one. At least in most countries like India.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48944635&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; but that is more costly and and less efficient. Maybe this is the clue as to why our concrete crumbles after 100 years: it&amp;#39;s not economically efficient to make it last longer?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://repebble.com/blog/pebble-mega-update-july-2026&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Pebble Mega Update – July 2026&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (repebble.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48943174&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;272 points · 188 comments · by crazysaem&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rePebble has fulfilled 80% of Pebble Time 2 pre-orders and plans to begin mass production of the Pebble Round 2 and Index 01 ring in late July, with shipping for both expected to conclude by the end of September 2026. &lt;a href=&quot;https://repebble.com/blog/pebble-mega-update-july-2026&quot; title=&quot;Title: Pebble Mega Update - July 2026    URL Source: https://repebble.com/blog/pebble-mega-update-july-2026    Published Time: 2026-07-14    Markdown Content:  TL:DR;    ### [#Pebble Time 2 Shipping Status](https://repebble.com/blog/pebble-mega-update-july-2026#pebble-time-2-shipping-status)    ![Image 1](https://repebble.com/_next/image?url=%2Fassets%2Fpebble-mega-update-july-2026-0-cleanshot_2026-07-14_at_07.14.362x.png&amp;amp;w=3840&amp;amp;q=75)    Since we started mass production in late March, we’ve built over…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Pebble Index 01 has sparked significant controversy due to its non-rechargeable, single-use design, which provides only 12–15 hours of total recording time before requiring a full replacement &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48945718&quot; title=&quot;Was just checking out the Index 01 [1]: &amp;gt; Why can&amp;#39;t it be recharged? &amp;gt; We considered this but decided not to for several reasons: &amp;gt;    You&amp;#39;d probably lose the charger before the battery runs out! &amp;gt;    Adding charge circuitry and including a charger would make the product larger and more expensive. &amp;gt;    You send it back to us to recycle. I don&amp;#39;t think this is true. The charging circuit could have been in the charger itself. To provide access to the battery, one of the terminals could be behind a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48944549&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Battery that lasts for years&amp;#39; being actually 12-15 hours of recording is a huge turn off honestly. &amp;gt;How long does the battery last? &amp;gt;Roughly 12 to 15 hours of recording. On average, I use it 10-20 times per day to record 3-6 second thoughts. That&amp;#39;s up to 2 years of usage. They then say: &amp;gt;Wait, it&amp;#39;s single use? &amp;gt;Yes. We know this sounds a bit odd, but in this particular circumstance we believe it&amp;#39;s the best solution to the given set of constraints. Other smart rings like Oura cost $250+ and…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48946152&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, that&amp;#39;s really not great at all! From their website: &amp;gt; Wait, it&amp;#39;s single use?  Yes. We know this sounds a bit odd, but in this particular circumstance we believe it&amp;#39;s the best solution to the given set of constraints I don&amp;#39;t want to be too harsh, since it seems like the pebble team are working hard at producing some exciting tech. But intentionally making a single use device is phenomenally irresponsible in today&amp;#39;s climate. I know they say they&amp;#39;ll recycle them, but it&amp;#39;d be naive to expect…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While the company argues this approach keeps the device small and affordable, users criticize the environmental impact of creating intentional e-waste and suggest that charging circuitry could have been implemented without significantly increasing complexity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48945718&quot; title=&quot;Was just checking out the Index 01 [1]: &amp;gt; Why can&amp;#39;t it be recharged? &amp;gt; We considered this but decided not to for several reasons: &amp;gt;    You&amp;#39;d probably lose the charger before the battery runs out! &amp;gt;    Adding charge circuitry and including a charger would make the product larger and more expensive. &amp;gt;    You send it back to us to recycle. I don&amp;#39;t think this is true. The charging circuit could have been in the charger itself. To provide access to the battery, one of the terminals could be behind a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48944611&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s just a big faux pas in this day and age of environmental consciousness really. In my country we used to joke that people would buy a new car because the ashtray was full. This reminds me of that.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48946152&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, that&amp;#39;s really not great at all! From their website: &amp;gt; Wait, it&amp;#39;s single use?  Yes. We know this sounds a bit odd, but in this particular circumstance we believe it&amp;#39;s the best solution to the given set of constraints I don&amp;#39;t want to be too harsh, since it seems like the pebble team are working hard at producing some exciting tech. But intentionally making a single use device is phenomenally irresponsible in today&amp;#39;s climate. I know they say they&amp;#39;ll recycle them, but it&amp;#39;d be naive to expect…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48947927&quot; title=&quot;Exposed terminals would need a lot more than a single transistor. It would need ESD protection and it would change the outer case from being a complete sealed over mold into something that had to seal against two exposed terminals. That’s a big change. They would also need to ship a separate charger device to go with it, which approaches the complexity of the simple ring product. These are solvable problems, but it would increase the cost, decrease their margins, or both. For a niche, low…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Further dissatisfaction stems from a &amp;#34;debacle&amp;#34; regarding inaccurate ring sizing kits and a 30-day warranty that many consider unacceptably short for consumer electronics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48944893&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Is there a warranty? &amp;gt; Yes, we warrant against manufacturing defects for 30 days after you receive your order. Is this the shortest warranty on a consumer electronics device ever? What on earth are they thinking.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48947684&quot; title=&quot;The ring sizing has been such a debacle, first with needing to buy (!) their special ring sizing kit because standard sizing wouldn’t be accurate they said, and now they say that the ring sizing kits weren’t true to size and suggest this: &amp;gt; When in doubt, order a larger size. You can always adjust a larger Index 01 to feel smaller with a foam adhesive or clip but you can’t make it larger! Size up and shim it with foam!&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also skepticism regarding the &amp;#34;two-year&amp;#34; battery life claim, as power-users could easily exhaust the device in a matter of months &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48944549&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Battery that lasts for years&amp;#39; being actually 12-15 hours of recording is a huge turn off honestly. &amp;gt;How long does the battery last? &amp;gt;Roughly 12 to 15 hours of recording. On average, I use it 10-20 times per day to record 3-6 second thoughts. That&amp;#39;s up to 2 years of usage. They then say: &amp;gt;Wait, it&amp;#39;s single use? &amp;gt;Yes. We know this sounds a bit odd, but in this particular circumstance we believe it&amp;#39;s the best solution to the given set of constraints. Other smart rings like Oura cost $250+ and…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48947927&quot; title=&quot;Exposed terminals would need a lot more than a single transistor. It would need ESD protection and it would change the outer case from being a complete sealed over mold into something that had to seal against two exposed terminals. That’s a big change. They would also need to ship a separate charger device to go with it, which approaches the complexity of the simple ring product. These are solvable problems, but it would increase the cost, decrease their margins, or both. For a niche, low…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://improvesomething.today/responses-to-problems/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Three ways people respond to a problem (other than solving it)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (improvesomething.today)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48947490&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;273 points · 163 comments · by surprisetalk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Beyond direct resolution, people often respond to problems by pushing them to different areas, preserving them to maintain institutional relevance, or promoting new issues as a byproduct of solving existing ones. &lt;a href=&quot;https://improvesomething.today/responses-to-problems/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Three ways people respond to a problem (other than solving it)    URL Source: https://improvesomething.today/responses-to-problems/    Published Time: 2026-05-21T18:18:03.000Z    Markdown Content:  When people learn I’m a consultant, conversation often proceeds to problems and problem-solving. It’s true that I only get hired well after there is a problem. Typically a problem that has gotten so lousy that nobody wants to deal with it and it has therefore become worth the trouble—of spending…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the &amp;#34;Preserve the Problem&amp;#34; theory, where commenters argue that government agencies and non-profits lack the incentive to solve issues like homelessness or crime because doing so would diminish their budgets and political power &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48949311&quot; title=&quot;People often attribute the government&amp;#39;s inability to solve a problem even after throwing billions of dollars at it; as a sign of incompetence. While there is plenty of incompetence within government; I think the &amp;#39;Preserve the Problem&amp;#39; response is mostly to blame. If we &amp;#39;solved&amp;#39; crime, homelessness, drug use, poverty, etc.; then budgets would decrease and political power would diminish. Those in charge of solving the problem often have the least incentive to do so.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48950283&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m genuinely curious about even a hypothetical more detailed example of how some group would go about preserving a problem like homelessness, even unintentionally. I can&amp;#39;t wrap my mind about how it would actually happen beyond simplistic sayings. I live in Portland, OR where we have a large homeless problem and I continually hear that the groups being given money to help are incentivized to keep homelessness high for their own purposes. Like, obviously people who are paid like to keep getting…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics of this view question how such preservation would practically function, while others suggest it happens inadvertently through &amp;#34;middle bureaucracy&amp;#34; costs or by providing services that make the problem more tolerable and attract more people to the area &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48951682&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; how some group would go about preserving a problem like homelessness, even unintentionally Simplistic version: San Francisco spends roughly $100,000/year on each homeless person. In services, salaries for people working on it, rent for office buildings etc. I am willing to bet many of these people would not be homeless if we just gave them $100,000/year without all the middle bureaucracy layers.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48950641&quot; title=&quot;In the homelessness example, it&amp;#39;s not so much that the programs and groups want to justify their continued existence (though that might be happening too). It&amp;#39;s that the programs themselves incentivize more of the problem. When they give things to homeless people, such as food, shelter, clothes, social services, even needles and a &amp;#39;safe place&amp;#39; to get high in some cases, and often with few or no conditions, they make being homeless more tolerable. Word gets around, and people who could not…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Some participants point to specific policy failures, such as the high recidivism rates of repeat offenders, as evidence that solvable problems are being perpetuated rather than addressed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48949670&quot; title=&quot;A LOT of crime can be solved. A huge percentage of perps are multi-repeat perps. Putting them away permanently would solve a lot of crime. &amp;#39;75% to 83% of released prisoners are arrested for a new crime&amp;#39; https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/2018-update-prisone...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48951045&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Solved&amp;#39; (heavy quotes) because instiutionalizing dozens of millions of people with no improvement is a massive crime in and of itself. That&amp;#39;s like those stories of LLMs saying &amp;#39;I fixed the vulnerability in your app&amp;#39; by deleting the project entirely&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3003876&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;EEG shows brain can simultaneous encode two speech streams&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (journals.plos.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48943745&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;256 points · 177 comments · by giuliomagnifico&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Using EEG to track neural responses during attention switching, researchers found that the brain begins engaging with a new speaker before fully disengaging from the previous one, resulting in a transient period where both speech streams are simultaneously encoded and lexical context is reset. &lt;a href=&quot;https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3003876&quot; title=&quot;Competing speech streams are simultaneously represented in the human cortex during attention switching    How the brain rapidly switches attention between competing speech streams in complex listening environments is not fully understood. This study shows that neural tracking of a new speaker emerges before disengagement, with transient dual encoding and reduced alpha power supporting flexible auditory attention.    [Skip to main content](#main-content)    Advertisement    # [PLOS…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The study aligns with anecdotal evidence from pilots and radio officers who report a professional necessity to process multiple audio streams simultaneously &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48944248&quot; title=&quot;As a pilot and a radio officer, I have always been able to process and service 2 audio streams simultaneously. So not surprised with this finding.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48944358&quot; title=&quot;Airplane radios are generally broadcasting and receiving mono. There are modern headsets that can also play stereo, but only for onboard music or intercom purposes, if the plane supports it. But in planes with 2 radios you can usually configure their I/O individually. So you can listen (and also talk, although that makes sense less often) on two frequencies at the same time.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters note that the ability to multitask speech depends heavily on individual cognitive styles; for instance, some can count while speaking by using visualization, while others who rely on an internal monologue find these tasks mutually exclusive &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48945790&quot; title=&quot;Related, but this reminds me of the story by Richard Feynman [1] when he practices counting up to 60 seconds in his head, and after many experiments around what he can do simultaneously conclude that he can simultaneously count and read but not speak. Later sharing this to John Tukey, he&amp;#39;s told that Tukey can&amp;#39;t read while counting but could speak while counting. Turns out Tukey is visualizing looking at a tape, while he counts, while Feynman imagined himself talking to himself, so he couldn&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48946557&quot; title=&quot;Interesting, I experimented a bit with this when my daughter was younger. I used to walk around the room with her in my arms singing to get her to sleep. To ensure she would be settled I would then count 300 steps before putting her in the cot. I discovered I could count and sing at the same time by visualising the number in my head, instead of using my inner monologue. But it requires more focus to maintain. Thankfully these days she can get herself to sleep. But I miss it sometimes&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. This &amp;#34;leakage&amp;#34; between streams is also observed when reading aloud, where an independent train of thought or even a dream state can cause unintended words to slip into the speech &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48945438&quot; title=&quot;If reading aloud a children story, you may notice you are able to maintain an independent unrelated train of thought. While doing so, I notice that occasionally extra mistakes can &amp;#39;leak&amp;#39; into the story telling - e.g. you read a single word incorrectly, maybe substituting a word from your other train of thought.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48945812&quot; title=&quot;When I was a kid, my dad (a physicist) would often read stories to me and my brother. He would sometimes fall asleep while reading, and we could tell when that was coming because suddenly our children&amp;#39;s story would stop making sense and get filled with all these big physics terms.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a general consensus that while the brain monitors background streams for context and danger, conscious focus often struggles when two tasks compete for the same sensory modality, such as reading while listening to an audiobook &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48945002&quot; title=&quot;If you couldn&amp;#39;t process multiple streams ( audio/visual/other senses ) how would you ever be able to monitor the background for danger and context switch? There is a difference between conscious experience and what&amp;#39;s going on in the background.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48946975&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve noticed something similar. I can listen to audiobooks and follow/absorb what is going on without really paying attention, as long as I am not trying to read something. I can&amp;#39;t follow an audiobook and read at the same time. This is probably because I subvocalize when I read. I have taken speed reading courses but I don&amp;#39;t enjoy reading that way. I like feeling every word as I read.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48947297&quot; title=&quot;I read by imagining a voice saying the words. Is that not how everyone reads?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jvns.ca/blog/2026/07/17/learning-about-running-sqlite/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Learning a few things about running SQLite&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jvns.ca)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48950122&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;335 points · 87 comments · by surprisetalk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author shares practical lessons from running SQLite in production, highlighting the importance of the `ANALYZE` command for query performance, managing write timeouts during large deletions, and implementing backup strategies using tools like Litestream and Restic. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jvns.ca/blog/2026/07/17/learning-about-running-sqlite/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Learning a few things about running SQLite    URL Source: https://jvns.ca/blog/2026/07/17/learning-about-running-sqlite/    Markdown Content:  Hello! I’ve been working on a Django site recently, and I decided to use SQLite as the database. When I was getting started with using SQLite as database for a website I read a [bunch](https://alldjango.com/articles/definitive-guide-to-using-django-sqlite-in-production) of blog posts about how it is totally fine to use SQLite in production for a small…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While SQLite is primarily intended for local storage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48951878&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s great! However, it&amp;#39;s only meant for local systems. Once you need to connect over a network or robustly handle simultaneous requests, you need something like postgres.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48952853&quot; title=&quot;Once you release software to the world, the world can choose use it however it wants. Still, the author&amp;#39;s of SQLite document their intention for it to be used locally on their &amp;#39;when to use&amp;#39; page. &amp;gt; SQLite strives to provide local data storage for individual applications and devices. https://www.sqlite.org/whentouse.html&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, users note it can effectively handle websites with up to 100,000 daily hits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48953216&quot; title=&quot;To be fair they also say &amp;gt; Generally speaking, any site that gets fewer than 100K hits/day should work fine with SQLite.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a debate regarding when to migrate to &amp;#34;real&amp;#34; databases like Postgres; some argue Postgres handles complex operations and simultaneous writers better &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48951878&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s great! However, it&amp;#39;s only meant for local systems. Once you need to connect over a network or robustly handle simultaneous requests, you need something like postgres.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48953365&quot; title=&quot;Why not try a real database like Postgres? It&amp;#39;s not as light-weight, but when operations get complicated, real databases are much easier to work with. I had a website that started with SQLLite, but when it got complicated enough, I spent two days to migrate the whole thing to Postgres. With current LLM coding agents, it&amp;#39;s not that hard.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, while others point out that even robust databases require the same small-batch cleanup strategies used in SQLite to maintain performance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48951282&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Maybe one day I’ll learn to read a query plan. With SQLite&amp;#39;s `.expert` mode you can delay that day a little longer: https://www.sqlite.org/cli.html#index_recommendations_sqlite... sqlite&amp;gt; CREATE TABLE x1(a, b, c);                  -- Create table in database     sqlite&amp;gt; .expert    sqlite&amp;gt; SELECT * FROM x1 WHERE a=? AND b&amp;gt;?;        -- Analyze this SELECT     CREATE INDEX x1_idx_000123a7 ON x1(a, b);      0|0|0|SEARCH TABLE x1 USING INDEX x1_idx_000123a7 (a=? AND b&amp;gt;?)      sqlite&amp;gt; CREATE INDEX x1ab ON…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48951513&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve worked with large MySQL databases that used row-based replication and things like an UPDATE or DELETE that affected millions of rows had to be applied in batches there, because otherwise one SQL query might result in a million updated rows needing to be sent to all of the replicas at once.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable technical advice includes using `.expert` mode for index recommendations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48951282&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Maybe one day I’ll learn to read a query plan. With SQLite&amp;#39;s `.expert` mode you can delay that day a little longer: https://www.sqlite.org/cli.html#index_recommendations_sqlite... sqlite&amp;gt; CREATE TABLE x1(a, b, c);                  -- Create table in database     sqlite&amp;gt; .expert    sqlite&amp;gt; SELECT * FROM x1 WHERE a=? AND b&amp;gt;?;        -- Analyze this SELECT     CREATE INDEX x1_idx_000123a7 ON x1(a, b);      0|0|0|SEARCH TABLE x1 USING INDEX x1_idx_000123a7 (a=? AND b&amp;gt;?)      sqlite&amp;gt; CREATE INDEX x1ab ON…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, employing `s3-credentials` to simplify backup security &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48951162&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I’ve been backing up to AWS, which is always a pain because it’s annoying to navigate the AWS console to generate credentials. I got so annoyed with that a few years ago that I ended up building a whole tool just to solve that one problem: uvx s3-credentials create my-existing-s3-bucket This spits out read-write credentials that are scoped JUST for that bucket. You can add --read-only or --write-only to have credentials that are further locked down, or even add --prefix foo/bar for…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, and using `.dump` with `zstd` to create sync-friendly backups without blocking writers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48951714&quot; title=&quot;I run my backups like this: OUT=&amp;#39;${i}.sql.zst&amp;#39;      PART=&amp;#39;${OUT}.part&amp;#39;      sqlite3 -readonly &amp;#39;${i}&amp;#39; .dump | zstd --fast --rsyncable -v -o &amp;#39;${PART}&amp;#39; -      mv &amp;#39;${PART}&amp;#39; &amp;#39;${OUT}&amp;#39; That doesn&amp;#39;t block writers (when the writer uses WAL), and gives me a dump that&amp;#39;s compressed well while also being easy to sync.  My Home Assistant DB is 1.8GB, my dump is 286MB compressed, and I&amp;#39;d guess 90% of that is consistent from one day to the next.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://goliath32.com/blog/z80.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Zilog Z80 has turned 50&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (goliath32.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48951461&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;286 points · 118 comments · by st_goliath&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Zilog Z80 processor has reached its 50th anniversary, marking five decades since its 1976 launch as a high-performance, binary-compatible successor to the Intel 8080 that powered iconic 8-bit microcomputers and industrial systems before its official discontinuation in 2024. &lt;a href=&quot;https://goliath32.com/blog/z80.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Zilog Z80 has turned 50    URL Source: https://goliath32.com/blog/z80.html    Published Time: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 21:55:55 GMT    Markdown Content:  [![Image 1](https://goliath32.com/img/return.gif)Back to the Blog Index](https://goliath32.com/blog/index.html)    * * *    ### Introduction    [![Image 2](https://goliath32.com/img/prev/blog/z80/0.jpg)](https://goliath32.com/img/photo/blog/z80/0.jpg)  As of writing, the Zilog Z80 processor was officially launched 50 years ago, in July of 1976, less than…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Zilog Z80 is celebrated as a &amp;#34;magnificent&amp;#34; CPU that served as a foundational learning tool for many, with users recalling hand-assembling hex codes and studying logic probes to understand its architecture &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48952051&quot; title=&quot;I started programming in 1978 (In Assembler) and wanted to know not only how the software worked but how the hardware worked. Found a great kit using the Z80 and built it and spent many nights with a logic probe and oscilloscope learning digital eletronics. Also devoured the Z80 manual learning the instruction set. I&amp;#39;m nearly 70 now but remember those days like they were yesterday. Truly a magnificent CPU&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48953223&quot; title=&quot;35 years ago I had to program a Z80 by &amp;#39;assembling&amp;#39; programs by hand and punching hexcodes into a board. This was made easier by writing an assembler for it. This was my way into tools which took me eventually to working on a major C++ compiler.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While the chip is often associated with early home computers like the ZX-81, its most enduring legacy is its continued use in TI-84 calculators, though some criticize Texas Instruments for selling this &amp;#34;outdated hardware&amp;#34; at high prices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48951812&quot; title=&quot;No mention of the TI-84 calculator? Used by millions of American schoolchildren, programmable in BASIC, and runs on Z80 (B/W models)/eZ80 (color display models) to this day&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48951993&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Used by millions of American schoolchildren Europe too :) When I was in high school, TI-84 Plus was the calculator the school told all of us to buy. And I see that stores in my country are still stocking them so I have to assume they are still being bought and used. Many hours were spent by me and my friends making and showing off little programs in TI-BASIC on those calculators. None of us ever took it all the way to learning Z80 assembly however. I printed a whole manual about Z80 assembly…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48952036&quot; title=&quot;Same here (actually had a voyage 200, but same same I guess). It&amp;#39;s actually quite insulting that TI kept (and keeps?) selling waaay outdated hardware at horrendous prices. It&amp;#39;s the SAP/Oracle business model applied to school hardware.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite its reputation for 8080 compatibility, technical discussions note subtle differences in flag behavior and opcode repurposing between the two processors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48952609&quot; title=&quot;The article claims:  &amp;gt; The Z80 is fully binary compatible with the 8080 instruction set. It wasn&amp;#39;t in regards to the flag register. The parity flag behaved differently for some ops. And of course it would be possible to write an 8080 program that used undefined ops that would execute in some random way (often just duplicating an existing instruction) while the Z80 repurposed that opcode for something new.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://privacypros.com.au/privacy-hub/articles/dv-safe-phone-australia/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GrapheneOS recommended for domestic abuse victims&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (privacypros.com.au)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48942454&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;174 points · &lt;strong&gt;197 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by aussieguy1234&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PrivacyPros is recommending GrapheneOS-equipped &amp;#34;DV Safe Phones&amp;#34; to help Australian domestic violence survivors combat tech-facilitated abuse through features like de-Googled software, app isolation, and duress PINs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://privacypros.com.au/privacy-hub/articles/dv-safe-phone-australia/&quot; title=&quot;DV Safe Phones Australia: Protecting Survivors from Tech Abuse in 2026 | PrivacyPros    Tech abuse is increasing in domestic violence cases across Australia. Learn how configured DV Safe Phones help survivors reduce tracking, and regain control.    [Skip to content](#content)    [![privacypros australia logo2](https://privacypros.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/privacypros-logo-white.svg)](https://privacypros.com.au)    * [Privacy Phones](https://privacypros.com.au/privacy-phones/)  * [Privacy…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights GrapheneOS as a solution to the &amp;#34;insane&amp;#34; level of identity integration in mainstream mobile OSs, where simple actions like downloading apps require providing a phone number to Apple or Google &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48943186&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s absolutely insane that phones have online accounts deeply integrated into the OS. You need to give Apple your phone number to download any apps on iOS. For example: Say anyone that downloaded IceBlock commited crime, Apple could give the govt everyone who downloaded its phone number, the govt could get the realtime location of everyone based on their phone number from the carrier. And that&amp;#39;s not even mentioning the other problem that nobody can download IceBlock anymore[1]. It&amp;#39;s so…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Users express deep concern over remote attestation, arguing it creates a &amp;#34;terrifying&amp;#34; future where running free software marks a device as untrusted and ostracizes users from digital society &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48943760&quot; title=&quot;Remote attestation is not just insane, it&amp;#39;s the technology that will end free computing as we know it today. What good is free software if using it marks our devices as untrusted and gets us banned from every service out there? Gets us ostracized from digital society? Because we &amp;#39;tampered&amp;#39; with the device? We should be able to run whatever software we want and they should be none the wiser. Instead, we are part of the threat model now. Our devices are now cryptographically attesting that they…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. This is increasingly problematic as government services and private businesses—ranging from digital IDs in the UK to travel visas in Australia—now mandate the use of apps that often block GrapheneOS due to these hardware/software integrity checks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48943215&quot; title=&quot;I agree with that.. additionaly, I&amp;#39;m finding it to be insane that organizations are trying to force you to have a &amp;#39;audited&amp;#39; phone to interact with them. (I.e. events, businesses, etc)&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48943705&quot; title=&quot;We&amp;#39;re running into situations where the usage of smart phones and apps are becoming mandatory for using services. For example: The UK has a digital ID requirement which is required for you to be employed in the UK. Additionally the EU digital identity services have a hardware/software attestitation that is required to run their apps. (Many of those which 3rd party software can&amp;#39;t run). Another example of this is the Australian eTA - (Everyone has to have a visa to visit Australia.. but the real…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate the morality of building technology that could shield criminals from investigation, others maintain that privacy is a higher moral principle necessary to protect against bad actors and state overreach &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48944166&quot; title=&quot;And why not? Law enforcement does not represent supreme justice and good. There are higher moral principles out there. Respect for law enforcement in the absence of justice is a disaster for society. All it does is give cover for bad actors.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48944292&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s plenty of high moral principles, but &amp;#39;let&amp;#39;s build technology that explicitly protects criminals - especially child and women traffickers - against investigation&amp;#39; ain&amp;#39;t one of them for majority of people living in democracies.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://scotto.me/blog/2026-07-17-which-lisp/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A Road to Lisp: Which Lisp&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (scotto.me)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48947455&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;198 points · 166 comments · by silcoon&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article explores the Lisp family of languages, highlighting **Common Lisp** for its performance and stability, **Clojure** for its modern functional approach and JVM integration, and **Racket** for its language-oriented design, ultimately recommending Clojure as the most practical starting point for professional programmers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://scotto.me/blog/2026-07-17-which-lisp/&quot; title=&quot;Title: A Road to Lisp: Which Lisp    URL Source: https://scotto.me/blog/2026-07-17-which-lisp/    Published Time: 2026-07-17T00:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  Most programming languages evolve as a single language. Python, Java, Javascript, C++, have new versions and standards, multiple implementations, but they still remain the same language. C and C++ can be compiled with GCC or Clang, Python can be compiled with CPython or PyPy, the same JavaScript runs in both Firefox and Chrome, and Java…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Lisp community remains divided between the minimalist, flexible nature of Scheme and the practical, ecosystem-rich advantages of Common Lisp and Clojure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48948913&quot; title=&quot;Since a few folks here recommended Common Lisp to me as the language that would &amp;#39;tick all my boxes&amp;#39;, I&amp;#39;ve been doing a deep dive. Right now, I&amp;#39;m working through SICP again with DrRacket. The first time I worked through it with MIT Scheme MANY years ago. It&amp;#39;s shocking how much I&amp;#39;ve forgotten. What I like about this article is that it walks through the different &amp;#39;camps&amp;#39; of Lisp. Scheme is so intriguing to me because of how small it can actually be. I can build nearly any paradigm I want to exist.…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48949270&quot; title=&quot;I can also recommend clojure. For me it has the best parts of common lisp and the best of the java ecosystem. But its also quite different from common lisp and scheme. Different enough to find some unique ideas. Writing scripts using [0] Babashka is also really nice. [0] https://babashka.org/&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users praise Clojure for its JVM integration and stable library ecosystem &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48949336&quot; title=&quot;I particpated in a Clojure reading group for &amp;#39;Getting Clojure&amp;#39; back around 2017. Having the entire JVM ecosystem available, is absolutely a great benefit. I even fooled around with ClojureScript a bit. David Nolen is great at making the case for both.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48950019&quot; title=&quot;As a former Clojure dev (now just using Clojure in my spare time) I love Babashka. Michiel Borkent really nailed it with sci (Small Clojure Interpreter) and Babashka. Running a custom Clojure interpreter in a GraalVM compiled Clojure app is quite clever. Now there are of course limitations to what you can do in terms of not supporting Java reflection or the full Clojure compiler. But I&amp;#39;ve made some nifty small scripts and convenience helpers with it. And the dev experience of making these…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that Lisp&amp;#39;s perceived &amp;#34;magic&amp;#34; is overstated, noting that modern languages like Python and JavaScript have already adopted many of its functional and metaprogramming concepts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48950426&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m going to take the opposite position that there is much less special about Lisp than people think.  Like I have met so many programmers that travel around like itinerant martial artists looking for true functional programming and they never find it. To be specific,  you can work all of the examples in Graham&amp;#39;s On Lisp in Python except for one of the last chapters where he implements continuations that really need macros -- but this is basically the async/await facility that Python already…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant barriers to adoption persist, including the steep learning curve of Emacs-centric tooling, readability challenges compared to procedural styles, and the sheer fragmentation of the dialect landscape &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48948351&quot; title=&quot;I really wanted to Lisp as a main programming language, and sometimes I still do. I just find readability such a hurdle regardless of how long I used it. I didn&amp;#39;t find that it ever became as natural as the other group of programming languages. I find a procedural style of programming so much easier to reason about, both when writing and reading. Either way, I&amp;#39;m really happy I took some time to learn it and use it a little at some point.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48949388&quot; title=&quot;I just wish a good IDE existed so I don&amp;#39;t have to use Emacs. That&amp;#39;s what made me drop lisp in the past. I would be happy with (neo)Vim setup as well, but that was way behind Emacs and broken when I tried.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48950061&quot; title=&quot;The funny thing about Lisp is that writing a Lisp interpreter is significantly fewer keystrokes than correctly installing Common Lisp and its tooling. The ratio of lisps to lisp programmers may actually be above 1.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/BadChemical/IoT-Vulnerability-Research-Public/blob/main/TP-Link_Kasa_EC71/Kasa_EC71.md&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;TP-Link Kasa cameras leaked home GPS via unauthenticated UDP for 6 years&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48952565&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;234 points · 87 comments · by BadChemical&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TP-Link has patched critical vulnerabilities in its Kasa EC71 cameras that exposed precise user GPS coordinates, hardcoded encryption keys, and unsalted password hashes via unauthenticated requests. These flaws, some persisting for six years, allowed attackers to track owners and potentially hijack accounts across the entire TP-Link ecosystem. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/BadChemical/IoT-Vulnerability-Research-Public/blob/main/TP-Link_Kasa_EC71/Kasa_EC71.md&quot; title=&quot;Title: IoT-Vulnerability-Research-Public/TP-Link_Kasa_EC71/Kasa_EC71.md at main · BadChemical/IoT-Vulnerability-Research-Public    URL Source: https://github.com/BadChemical/IoT-Vulnerability-Research-Public/blob/main/TP-Link_Kasa_EC71/Kasa_EC71.md    Markdown Content:  ## Security Advisory: Kasa Spot EC71 (Firmware 2.3.26)    [](https://github.com/BadChemical/IoT-Vulnerability-Research-Public/blob/main/TP-Link_Kasa_EC71/Kasa_EC71.md#security-advisory-kasa-spot-ec71-firmware-2326)  **Author:**…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discovery of a long-standing GPS leak in TP-Link cameras has reignited debates over the inherent security risks of cheap IoT hardware and the necessity of isolating these devices from the public internet &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48954568&quot; title=&quot;This underscores the principle that IoT devices should not be allowed to communicate over the public Internet. Pretty much all cheap, Chinese-made hardware of this kind has intentional or unintentional security holes waiting to be exploited.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48954697&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;  Pretty much all cheap, Chinese-made hardware of this kind has intentional or unintentional security holes waiting to be exploited. Why single out bad Chinese coding? Bad US IoT coding has a longer history.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that &amp;#34;average Joes&amp;#34; require cloud-based remote access for ease of use, others suggest that ecosystems like Apple’s HomeKit provide a more secure middle ground by using a local hub to bridge remote connections without exposing the devices directly &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48955069&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Chinese-made hardware Honestly, I&amp;#39;d rather it leak my GPS to the Chinese government than the US government. They don&amp;#39;t have jurisdiction over me anyway. &amp;gt; should not be allowed to communicate over the public Internet It would be a no-go for non-techies. One of the biggest draws to IoT devices for &amp;#39;average Joes&amp;#39; is being able to view and control them from remotely, and they aren&amp;#39;t going to have the skills or know-how to set up a VPN correctly with dynamic DNS so that their phone can VPN into…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48955106&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It would be a no-go for non-techies. There are better solutions, like Apple’s HomeKit. I’m able to watch a camera that has no internet access because it passed through my Apple TV, which serves as a home hub. I didn’t have to set any of this up, it just works when you have the required hardware.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48955131&quot; title=&quot;HomeKit will take care of the VPN/remote access part, sure, but your devices still need to communicate with the HomeKit device, and that&amp;#39;s usually over Wi-Fi, which puts the devices on the public internet, and carries the same security risk. There are various non-internet protocols for IoT devices, none of them good: * Zigbee: Requires some technical understanding to set up, devices randomly disconnect for hours even when they are 2ft from the coordinator, all-around horrible experience for…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. However, skeptics point out that this still requires trusting a central manufacturer, and that the actual risk of this specific leak may be overstated since the data was likely only accessible to those already on the local network &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48954331&quot; title=&quot;The report seems obviously AI generated, so I can&amp;#39;t be bothered to read in its entirety, but based on my quick skim, &amp;#39;leaked home GPS&amp;#39; makes it sound worse than it is. Unless you&amp;#39;re dumb enough to set DMZ on this device, this won&amp;#39;t be exposed to the internet, and if it&amp;#39;s LAN only, don&amp;#39;t you already know the location? Even for a remote attacker who somehow got LAN access remotely, they can probably deduce the location through other means (eg. using crowdsourced wifi databases).&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48955221&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I’m able to watch a camera that has no internet access because it passed through my Apple TV, which serves as a home hub. How exactly does this prevent the same kind of issue for Apple devices? Aren&amp;#39;t you just trusting that Apple handles your data better than TP-Link? Not saying they don&amp;#39;t but routing through another device doesn&amp;#39;t really add security on its own.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/17/faa-boeing-737-max-787.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;FAA lets Boeing sign off on 737 MAX, 787 airworthiness certificates again&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cnbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48952439&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;196 points · 118 comments · by hmm37&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FAA has restored Boeing’s authority to issue airworthiness certificates for its 737 Max and 787 Dreamliner aircraft. The manufacturer was stripped of this power following fatal crashes in 2018 and 2019, but the regulator now deems Boeing’s production quality comparable to its own. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/17/faa-boeing-737-max-787.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: FAA lets Boeing sign off on 737 Max, 787 airworthiness certificates again    URL Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/17/faa-boeing-737-max-787.html    Published Time: 2026-07-17T17:55:14+0000    Markdown Content:  [Skip Navigation](https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/17/faa-boeing-737-max-787.html#MainContent)    [![Image 2: CNBC logo](https://static-redesign.cnbcfm.com/dist/d6085c9e81f4d7365c8d.svg)](https://www.cnbc.com/)    FAA lets Boeing sign off on 737 Max, 787 airworthiness certificates again    *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FAA&amp;#39;s decision to restore Boeing’s self-certification authority has sparked debate over whether the move repeats past mistakes or is a standard administrative return to form &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48952526&quot; title=&quot;Totally insane. Repeating the same errors as in the past and hoping for a better outcome...  Only corruption can explain that...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48952854&quot; title=&quot;Can you explain exactly why this is bad?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that self-certification contributed to a chain of failures that led to the 737 MAX crashes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48953479&quot; title=&quot;Well that is profoundly lazy. Here, put it into your favorite LLM: &amp;#39;Is there a suspected or established relationship between Boeing&amp;#39;s self-certification and the 737 MAX crashes?&amp;#39; That will almost certainly link to the thousands of pages of Congressional, OIG, FAA testimony, investigation, and reporting. Does GP think Boeing&amp;#39;s self-certification authority was revoked after the accidents just for funsies? By random chance?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48953630&quot; title=&quot;As has been noted in the actual reports, the crashes (as is true of all crashes) were the result of a specific chain of failures across several functions and organizations. One component of that chain of failures is the self-certification process. If the FAA had the resource and mandate to actually understand each aircraft design change, then it&amp;#39;s very likely (not guaranteed, but very likely) that the MCAS design having a single point of failure on the AoA sensor would have been flagged as…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that these specific &amp;#34;airworthiness certificates&amp;#34; only confirm an individual plane matches its approved design, whereas the crashes were caused by flaws in the &amp;#34;type certificate&amp;#34; design itself &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48953571&quot; title=&quot;As has been noted in several of the comments, the crashes were a result of a faulty design, not aircraft failing to meet the design. The self-certification here wasn’t part of the chain of events that led to the crashes; it appears to have been related to other issues the FAA uncovered as a side effect of their investigation.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48953178&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The U.S. government on Friday said Boeing   can once again issue airworthiness certificates for its bestselling 737 Max aircraft and 787 Dreamliners, an authority that was stripped from the manufacturer after fatal crashes in 2018 and 2019 of the 737 Max. I&amp;#39;m a bit confused by this. From what I&amp;#39;ve read an &amp;#39;airworthiness certificate&amp;#39; is not a certificate that the aircraft design is good and safe. That would be a type certificate. The airworthiness certificate is issued for a particular aircraft…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48953682&quot; title=&quot;Design changes are not part of the self certification process, they’re part of the type certification process, which has always been handled by the FAA.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite public outcry following previous disasters, commercial pressure for rapid recertification remains high, and consumer behavior has largely not shifted away from Boeing aircraft &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48952758&quot; title=&quot;The 737 has had 14 major recertifications. The aircraft today looks/behaves nothing like the original from the 1960s. The main motivation for recertifications comes from commercial pressure where if a aircraft is given a new number and not recertified, then the pilots have to be retrained. Honestly, back when the 737 MAX debacle happened, a lot of consumers claimed that they would stop flying aircrafts if they ran into 737 MAXs. And I don&amp;#39;t think it happened in enough numbers - or even enough…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-07-16</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-07-16</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.kimi.com/blog/kimi-k3&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (kimi.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48935342&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2081 points&lt;/strong&gt; · &lt;strong&gt;1200 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by vincent_s&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moonshot AI has launched Kimi K3, a new reasoning model that achieves state-of-the-art performance on logic and mathematics benchmarks while offering significantly lower pricing compared to its competitors. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.kimi.com/blog/kimi-k3&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.kimi.com&amp;amp;#x2F;en&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.kimi.com&amp;amp;#x2F;en&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Kimi K3 Intelligence, Performance &amp;amp;amp; Price Analysis: &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;artificialanalysis.ai&amp;amp;#x2F;models&amp;amp;#x2F;kimi-k3&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;artificialanalysis.ai&amp;amp;#x2F;models&amp;amp;#x2F;kimi-k3&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kimi K3 is positioned as a &amp;#34;frontier-level&amp;#34; model, with benchmarks suggesting it ranks just behind top-tier models like Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48937998&quot; title=&quot;Some official benchmark numbers posted in Chinese social media (I am sure they will publish an English blogpost later too): https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/V4xhEIy8xDXSMDPrPkmUAQ Generally looks like a Sol/Fable tier model, better across the board than Opus 4.8. (Edit) English blogpost is up now: https://www.kimi.com/blog/kimi-k3&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48935831&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; In our evaluations, Kimi K3 delivers frontier-level performance. Among the models tested, its overall intelligence ranks second only to Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol. For the complete benchmark results, see our tech blog. The full model weights of Kimi K3 will be released in the coming days. More details on the architecture, training, and evaluation will be published together with the Kimi K3 technical report. &amp;gt; K3 pushes the boundary of end-to-end knowledge work. On the GDPval-AA v2…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While its pricing is high for a Chinese model, users are particularly impressed by its &amp;#34;agentic&amp;#34; capabilities, such as autonomously designing a functional 45nm chip in 48 hours &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48935574&quot; title=&quot;More details: - https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart - https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/pricing/chat-k3 1M context, pricing is $3/$15 for 1M tokens (cache $0.3), which is extremely high for a Chinese open-weight model, but if it&amp;#39;s truly competitive with most of the current frontier and is only behind Fable/Sol, the pricing is justified. This is 1:1 pricing of Anthropic&amp;#39;s Sonnet series (except Sonnet 5 which is currently on discount), and very close to 5.6 Terra pricing (Terra&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48939859&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Chip Design &amp;gt; As an early proof of concept, Kimi K3 designed a chip to serve a nano model built on its own architecture. In a single 48-hour autonomous run, K3 built, optimized, and verified the chip using open-source EDA tools on the Nangate 45nm library. Within 4 mm², the chip closes timing at 100 MHz and sustains over 8,700 tokens/s decode throughput in simulation, packing 1.46M standard cells, 0.277 MB of SRAM, and an INT4 MAC array with fused dequantization. A chip built by a model, for…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, significant privacy concerns exist, as Moonshot&amp;#39;s terms indicate they may train on API data unless users negotiate separate enterprise agreements &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48939288&quot; title=&quot;Just in case you were thinking of signing up directly with Moonshot to use the service, they appear to train even on API use: &amp;gt; We may use Content to provide, maintain, develop, support, and improve the Services, comply with applicable law, enforce our terms and policies, and keep the Services safe and secure. Customer who requires restrictions on the use of Customer Content for training or improving Moonshot AI models may contact Moonshot AI to discuss available enterprise arrangements or…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. This has sparked debate over whether Chinese labs offer more transparency than Western counterparts or if the lack of legal recourse makes them a greater risk &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48939739&quot; title=&quot;I pretty sure OpenAI and Anthropic are doing the same or worse. Keep in mind that these companies are in the business of stealing IP work and reselling it to you with &amp;#39;safety checks&amp;#39; so asking if they use your usage data for training is a bit naive at best. At least the Chinese companies are more open and give back to the community compared with the &amp;#39;frontier&amp;#39; providers.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48939799&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I pretty sure OpenAI and Anthropic are doing the same or worse. No they&amp;#39;re not. It would end both companies if they were ever found to be doing that. Their terms are clear - if you use the coding plans they can[0] train in return. Enterprise and API, absolutely not. The argument here is that with the Chinese labs you have zero legal recourse. [0] opt-in, thanks&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pigeonsandplanes.com/read/music-piracy-what-cd-oink-nine-inch-nails-streaming&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The lost joy of music piracy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (pigeonsandplanes.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48930454&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;839 points · 596 comments · by mcgin&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Former Nine Inch Nails creative director Rob Sheridan and former moderators reflect on the legacy of elite music piracy sites like What.CD, arguing that while streaming finally adopted their distribution models, it failed to solve the industry&amp;#39;s issues regarding fair artist compensation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pigeonsandplanes.com/read/music-piracy-what-cd-oink-nine-inch-nails-streaming&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Lost Joy of Music Piracy    URL Source: https://www.pigeonsandplanes.com/read/music-piracy-what-cd-oink-nine-inch-nails-streaming    Published Time: 2026-07-15T14:52:31.519Z    Markdown Content:  “I was responsible for the dancing baby meme,” Rob Sheridan laughs over a video call. Now better known as an accomplished graphic designer and the former creative director of Nine Inch Nails, Sheridan’s list of accolades date back to 1997, when he created a website dedicated to the low-resolution…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The era of music piracy is remembered for its &amp;#34;cultural buy-in,&amp;#34; where music discovery was driven by social networks and personal curation rather than algorithms that many now find repetitive and soulless &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931632&quot; title=&quot;The thing I miss most, and the thing we’ll never get back was the cultural buy-in and network effects. My music discovery then was different friend groups incrementally amassing large collections of albums in whatever sub-culture that friend groups had doubled down on. My iPod would be the culmination of my friendships. I would then fall in love with bands and albums and tracks on these albums without any influence before hand on their popularity or their algorithmic match to my music tastes.…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931080&quot; title=&quot;Very fond memories of using Audiogalaxy, and also soulseek. Soulseek especially had a community where you found someone who was into the same kind of music as you (obscure breakcore! japanese garage punk!) and could browse their collections, and chat to them also! What a wonderful way to make music friends and get good recommendations.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that streaming services offer superior convenience and a more extensive catalog for the average listener &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931501&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;It&amp;#39;s important to remember that to this day, streaming sites do not have a full archive of the music out there. There is still a need for music piracy Ehhh..... I&amp;#39;d wager that pretty much anything that most people want to listen to is on music streaming sites. Streaming is how everyone consumes music these days, so everything new gets released there, and by this point the catalog from the CD era is extensive. Music streaming has more music than What or Oink ever did. Streaming also has huge…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that these platforms lack rare archives, forcing enthusiasts to rely on private trackers or used physical media &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931141&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s important to remember that to this day, streaming sites do not have a full archive of the music out there. There is still a need for music piracy Even albums mentioned in the Norwegian business magazine D2 can be impossible to find in legit channels. Your only option is to buy used CDs on Discogs for 50-100 USD, or know your way around the successors of these sites These CDs weren’t even on Oink or What (or did not survive the transitions)…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931025&quot; title=&quot;Music piracy is alive and well if you know where to look. Some places has been mentioned in this thread already. Of course there is no replacing the magic of early 2000-2010&amp;#39;s p2p sites like OiNK, What and Waffles - but well curated sites still exist.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931564&quot; title=&quot;Public p2p sharing is pretty much dead in the West. Only Russian Rutracker is still going strong, but everything other is either stagnating or defunct. I have a p2p sharing websites bookmarks which I collected about 5 years ago, 60% of them are dead now. Private (invite-only) West sharing websites are still alive though, but are supported mostly by beefy enthusiasts who seed everything via a seedbox elsewhere, not in their home country on their residential connection. Rutracker went the other…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. This nostalgia is tempered by debates over the ethics of &amp;#34;stealing the fruits of labor&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48930951&quot; title=&quot;Any amount of joy you lost is a fraction of joy lost from people blatantly stealing the fruits of other people&amp;#39;s&amp;#39;s labor. Communities do not have to be parasites to exist. Similar amounts of joy could be created over a different interest that didn&amp;#39;t require stealing and hurting others.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, though many still miss the synergy between hardware like the iPod and the vast, community-driven libraries of the P2P era &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931178&quot; title=&quot;One thing I miss about the iPod era is that Apple knew they were selling a device to play pirated music. It doesn&amp;#39;t take much look at how much music an iPod could store, how much music cost, and how much people had in disposable income to spend on music to realize that music had to come from other means. The iPod and P2P file sharing were incredibly synergistic in a way that makes me giggle. The iTunes store is just as much about getting the record companies on board as it is about running a…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931456&quot; title=&quot;It was also common to have a collection of CDs you owned and wanted to put on a device like this.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.techdirt.com/2026/07/15/sony-deletes-a-bunch-more-movies-from-the-accounts-of-people-who-bought-them/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sony deletes more movies from the accounts of people who ‘bought’ them&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techdirt.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933419&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;701 points · 445 comments · by nekusar&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sony is removing 551 movies and TV shows from PlayStation Store customers&amp;#39; libraries without refunds due to a failed licensing agreement with StudioCanal, highlighting the reality that digital &amp;#34;purchases&amp;#34; are often temporary licenses rather than permanent ownership. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.techdirt.com/2026/07/15/sony-deletes-a-bunch-more-movies-from-the-accounts-of-people-who-bought-them/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Sony Deletes A Bunch More Movies From The Accounts Of People Who ‘Bought’ Them    URL Source: https://www.techdirt.com/2026/07/15/sony-deletes-a-bunch-more-movies-from-the-accounts-of-people-who-bought-them/    Published Time: 2026-07-16T02:49:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  [![Image 2: Techdirt.](https://www.techdirt.com/wp-content/themes/techdirt/assets/images/techdirt.svg)](https://www.techdirt.com/)    - [x]     *   [Sign In](https://www.techdirt.com/my-account/)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the legal and ethical implications of digital &amp;#34;purchases&amp;#34; that can be revoked, with many arguing that using terms like &amp;#34;buy&amp;#34; for revocable licenses constitutes deceptive advertising &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934618&quot; title=&quot;IANAL, but is it illegal to have a &amp;#39;Buy&amp;#39; button that is just a disguised &amp;#39;Rent&amp;#39; button? If not, should we change the law?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934642&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;ll argue you&amp;#39;re &amp;#39;buying&amp;#39; a license that they can revoke when they feel like it.    My feelings on the matter have been summed up by someone else more clever than me as: If buying isn&amp;#39;t owning, then piracy isn&amp;#39;t stealing.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48939623&quot; title=&quot;Revocation should come with full refunds. That would: 1. Balance the revocation economically, for both parties, while leaving the decision to the &amp;#39;seller&amp;#39;. 2. The trade becomes the time-value of money vs. the time value of access. Inherently fair. The seller nets interest, and the inflation drop on the original price. What an accountant would come up with, yet automatic. 3. Provide users the remunerative recourse for &amp;#39;resuming&amp;#39; their &amp;#39;perpetual&amp;#39; license with another provider. 4. Motivate the…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some point to new legislation like California’s AB 2426 as a necessary fix &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48935434&quot; title=&quot;California Assembly Bill 2426 (AB 2426), effective 1 January, 2025. Expands the state&amp;#39;s false advertising laws to explicitly ban companies from using words like &amp;#39;buy,&amp;#39; &amp;#39;purchase,&amp;#39; &amp;#39;own,&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;keep&amp;#39; if what the customer is actually getting is a revocable digital license governed by shady T&amp;amp;Cs.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest that if &amp;#34;buying isn&amp;#39;t owning,&amp;#34; then piracy is a justifiable response &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934642&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;ll argue you&amp;#39;re &amp;#39;buying&amp;#39; a license that they can revoke when they feel like it.    My feelings on the matter have been summed up by someone else more clever than me as: If buying isn&amp;#39;t owning, then piracy isn&amp;#39;t stealing.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt; or advocate for mandatory full refunds upon revocation to balance the economic loss &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48939623&quot; title=&quot;Revocation should come with full refunds. That would: 1. Balance the revocation economically, for both parties, while leaving the decision to the &amp;#39;seller&amp;#39;. 2. The trade becomes the time-value of money vs. the time value of access. Inherently fair. The seller nets interest, and the inflation drop on the original price. What an accountant would come up with, yet automatic. 3. Provide users the remunerative recourse for &amp;#39;resuming&amp;#39; their &amp;#39;perpetual&amp;#39; license with another provider. 4. Motivate the…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond digital rights, users debate the decline of consoles, noting that while standardized hardware remains a benefit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934626&quot; title=&quot;The main thing consoles have going for them, imo, is the standardization of hardware. It&amp;#39;s very easy to say &amp;#39;Yes this game will run on my console at 60 FPS because its identical to the other consoles where it runs at 60 FPS.&amp;#39; Differing builds and drivers are not really a concern in the console world, where-as they are in the PC world. Some console gamers seem to think PC gaming requires hours of fiddling with settings and drivers. I think we&amp;#39;ve all had that experience on PC ( cough Bethesda…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, the technical justification for consoles has faded as PC hardware and cloud gaming become more accessible &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934441&quot; title=&quot;I read recently that PlayStation users are moving to PC en masse, and also Xbox has been gutted by layoffs, and there&amp;#39;s a backlash against Nintendo for the switch 2 pricing. Is the age of the console finally coming to an end?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934556&quot; title=&quot;Consoles made sense as a product category where specialized graphics hardware was not generally available for consumer PCs. We have this now, every PC has some kind of graphics hardware, and has for many years.  Consoles have been riding on their momentum of their brands , but the technical justification for their product category hasn&amp;#39;t existed for 15+ years now.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934864&quot; title=&quot;I would say the future is cloud gaming.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://opensource.microsoft.com/blog/2026/07/16/microsoft-comic-chat-is-now-open-source/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft Comic Chat is now open source&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (opensource.microsoft.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48936426&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;807 points · 177 comments · by jervant&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft has open-sourced the code for Comic Chat, its 1990s-era IRC client that famously introduced the Comic Sans font and automatically converted text conversations into illustrated comic panels. &lt;a href=&quot;https://opensource.microsoft.com/blog/2026/07/16/microsoft-comic-chat-is-now-open-source/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Microsoft Comic Chat is now open source    URL Source: https://opensource.microsoft.com/blog/2026/07/16/microsoft-comic-chat-is-now-open-source/    Published Time: 2026-07-16T15:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  _The chat client that brought Comic Sans to the world is now on GitHub_    Today, we’re excited to announce the [open-source](https://github.com/microsoft/comic-chat) release of **Microsoft Comic Chat**, the chat client that automatically turned conversations within Internet Relay Chat…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The open-sourcing of Microsoft Comic Chat, a project led by Robert Standefer with support from original developer DJ Kurlander, has sparked nostalgia for its unique role in internet history &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48938312&quot; title=&quot;Hi, I&amp;#39;m Robert Standefer, the guy who made this happen, with lots of support. I&amp;#39;m excited to see the enthusiasm about Comic Chat being open sourced. How this came to happen is a very interesting story that spans a six-year period with success that hinged upon being in the right place at the right time, literally. I want to point out that, while I (along with Scott Hanselman) made the Comic Chat open source release happen, I am not the original developer. That is DJ Kurlander, and he was very…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While fondly remembered for inspiring creative tools and webcomics like *Jerk City*, the software was historically controversial among IRC purists for appending &amp;#34;spammy&amp;#34; metadata to messages to facilitate character emoting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48936972&quot; title=&quot;Comic Chat is a piece of Internet history, but I remember that it was somewhat reviled when I first started being active on IRC. This was around 2002, so it was probably due to some cultural memory rather than anyone having actually used it in years. The issue, as I remember it, is that Comic Chat extended the IRC protocol with support for explicitly indicating the appearance and emoting of your comic character, rather than relying entirely on contextual cues. This was essentially done by…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48938878&quot; title=&quot;Thank you! My only experience with Comic Chat is reading Jerk City comics. Always thought it was a neat concept but never used it&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48937630&quot; title=&quot;Comic Chat has a special place in my heart because it inspired my first startup back in 2008, a comic creation web app called Chogger. The site grew to 30K monthly users, mostly K-12 educators who wanted to give their students a fun way to write stories. The comic creator app itself was adobe flex (flash), actionscript 3.0 (like a typed version of javascript), and I remember spending so many hours getting the balloon tail dragging behavior just right... one of the teachers made a video overview…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical discussions highlight the era&amp;#39;s fragmented version control practices at Microsoft, noting significant discrepancies between early source files despite the company&amp;#39;s internal development of systems like SLM &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48936903&quot; title=&quot;v1.0-pre and v1.0 share the same internal version number (rup 206, &amp;#39;Beta 2&amp;#39;) but differ in ~99 of 111 shared source files [1] While I shouldn&amp;#39;t complain because they just won&amp;#39;t do these releases in the future and I accept it was a different time; I still find it surprising Microsoft didn&amp;#39;t have better version control considering they took it seriously enough to build their own internal version control system (SLM). [2] [1]: https://github.com/microsoft/comic-chat#:~:text=v1.0%2Dpre%2... [2]:…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48937074&quot; title=&quot;Microsoft had just acquired SourceSafe in 1995, but it&amp;#39;s not clear to me how similar to modern version control systems SourceSafe even was in 1995/6. It may have been more of a distributed lock manager than change management system.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://community.oneplus.com/thread/2170715118587871237&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OnePlus halts operations in USA and Europe&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (community.oneplus.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48932539&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;594 points · 364 comments · by pilililo2&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OnePlus is halting new product rollouts in Europe and North America as part of a global strategy adjustment, though the company will continue providing software updates, warranties, and customer support for existing devices in those regions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://community.oneplus.com/thread/2170715118587871237&quot; title=&quot;Title: OnePlus Community    URL Source: https://community.oneplus.com/thread/2170715118587871237    Markdown Content:  [](https://community.oneplus.com/)    *   [Home](https://community.oneplus.com/)  *   [My circles](https://community.oneplus.com/myCircles)  *   [All circles](https://community.oneplus.com/allCircles)  *   [Beyond](https://community.oneplus.com/thread/2170715118587871237)  *   [Store](https://www.oneplus.com/store)    [](https://community.oneplus.com/message)     New Thread    Important…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The news that OnePlus is halting new product rollouts in North America and Europe was met with skepticism, as users interpreted the &amp;#34;PR speak&amp;#34; as a sign the brand will effectively cease to exist in those regions within a few years &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933106&quot; title=&quot;Editorialised! No new products, not halts operations. Please be more careful. OnePlus has decided to conclude new product rollouts in Europe and North America. The difference matters for those of us on OnePlus devices: Though we will no longer launch new products in Europe, our commitment to you remains unchanged. Backed by OPPO, existing OnePlus devices will continue to receive scheduled software updates and security patches within the support periods originally committed for each device…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933840&quot; title=&quot;I agree, title should have been done a lot better than that. I think we can read between the lines of the PR speak, though. That’s the rosiest possible way to put this news. No new devices, support during warranty periods, they’re going to basically stop existing within a year or two.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Former employees and long-time fans described the company&amp;#39;s decline from a &amp;#34;hacker&amp;#39;s choice&amp;#34; with stock Android to a hollowed-out subsidiary struggling with a grueling &amp;#34;996&amp;#34; work culture and poorly localized internal Chinese business practices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48939329&quot; title=&quot;I worked for OnePlus a few years ago, managing its Amazon account. The culture leaned heavily toward 996: 9 a.m. to 9 p.m., six days a week. I was there during a particularly tumultuous period, and by that point a lot of the staffing had already been hollowed out. That said, the OnePlus 11, 12, 13, and 15 are great phones. The 13 and 15 in particular have insane battery life. I have never managed to drain either one to zero in a single day. As far as I know, OnePlus and Motorola are also the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48935394&quot; title=&quot;OnePlus is one of the saddest stories out there.  It was the hacker&amp;#39;s choice for a while.  It was originally the &amp;#39;Never Settle&amp;#39; phone that ran mostly stock android, had specs maxxed out, price was great, and bootloader was unlocked plus they provided factory images.  Those were all reasons I bought a lot of OnePlus phones in the early years. Then they flushed nearly all of it down the toilet.  The day they stopped posting factory images was the day I saw the writing on the wall.  Such a shame.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users praised the hardware—specifically the industry-leading battery life of recent models—others suggested that those seeking a &amp;#34;no-fuss&amp;#34; experience should now look toward Google Pixel or Carl Pei’s new venture, Nothing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48939329&quot; title=&quot;I worked for OnePlus a few years ago, managing its Amazon account. The culture leaned heavily toward 996: 9 a.m. to 9 p.m., six days a week. I was there during a particularly tumultuous period, and by that point a lot of the staffing had already been hollowed out. That said, the OnePlus 11, 12, 13, and 15 are great phones. The 13 and 15 in particular have insane battery life. I have never managed to drain either one to zero in a single day. As far as I know, OnePlus and Motorola are also the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934134&quot; title=&quot;Sad I have a 6 year old oneplus and was looking for a new phone somewhat soon, would&amp;#39;ve considered them again for sure. Any alternatives? They always had a reputation for me for being a great no fuss, little bloat and simply fast android phone.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934251&quot; title=&quot;Google’s phones are pretty good nowadays, I feel like they carry that ethos more than modern OnePlus phones anyway. Plus they can be unlocked trivially, which is officially supported, and you can install GrapheneOS on them.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933247&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not sure as others why others feel this is a major change. OnePlus was always a subsidiary by Carl Pei [1] who eventually left the brand to create a new gadgets/tech company. Nothing [2] is the next project he started that keeps many of the ideas started with OnePlus, good value for money and aim for quality Android. Bootloader also seems to allow unlocking [3] In recent years OnePlus was just another Chinese phone. But if I&amp;#39;ve misunderstood something, I&amp;#39;ll appreciate me being corrected.…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tryai.dev/blog/ai-music-video-arena-claude-vs-gpt-5.6&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;$100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tryai.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48939524&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;396 points · &lt;strong&gt;535 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by hershyb_&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Researchers tested Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol by giving them autonomous control and budgets up to $100 to produce music videos, finding that while both successfully automated the entire production process, they struggled with character consistency, literal interpretations of lyrics, and artistic self-review. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tryai.dev/blog/ai-music-video-arena-claude-vs-gpt-5.6&quot; title=&quot;Title: $100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol    URL Source: https://www.tryai.dev/blog/ai-music-video-arena-claude-vs-gpt-5.6    Published Time: 2026-07-16    Markdown Content:  We built a small agentic harness with one job: hand a model a song, a hard dollar budget, and a set of tools, then get out of the way and let it produce a full music video on its own. The model researches which video models exist, generates clips, watches its own footage, edits with ffmpeg, and assembles a final…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The consensus among commenters is that the AI-generated music videos are &amp;#34;awful&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;unwatchable,&amp;#34; suffering from a lack of artistic depth and a tendency to produce overly literal interpretations of lyrics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48940722&quot; title=&quot;These are awful. It’s like Suno music. Seems convincing if you half listen. As soon as you pay attention you notice all the cracks.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48940066&quot; title=&quot;Unsure if it&amp;#39;s just the way they prompted it / coded it, but the output is far too  much a literal direct copy of the lyrics. The best music videos have a story arc on the theme of but often not litearlly the lyrics, and start with obscurity and reveal something (following all the literary/story mechanisms) Consider Amber Run - Found lyrics versus the video, and the story arc of the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yj6V_a1-EUA&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48940113&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; None of the music videos were great Glad they acknowledge this. Curious how much time in addition to tokens this costs. If you have to spend $25 and wait 45 minutes to get a basically unwatchable video, I&amp;#39;m not worried about indie film makers being replaced just yet...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that true art requires human struggle and context, dismissing these outputs as mere &amp;#34;content&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;garbage&amp;#34; that lacks meaningful intent &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48943038&quot; title=&quot;Tangent: philosophically to me, art is inherently human. What makes art meaningful and impactful isn’t whether it looks good or cool. It’s the story of the artist, the context of the art itself, the hard work and struggle involved, the meaning represented by a human creating something very specific to their own personal context and taste. Or a mix of any of that. Can AI be used as a tool to help create art? Absolutely. But as a rule, I do not give any shits about AI generated content like this.…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some suggest the technology is simply in an early stage similar to the evolution of visual effects, noting that creators can find success by leaning into the &amp;#34;uncanny valley&amp;#34; aesthetic rather than fighting it &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48940859&quot; title=&quot;Visual effects went through this same development issues as the industry matured. What took this industry decades to advance it taking months in AI. Think the spaghetti Will Smith and now this. Another one people don&amp;#39;t mention here but is specific to video is higgsfield ai.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48942359&quot; title=&quot;This is how you do AI music videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Njk2YAgNMnE Lean into the not-quite-but-almost uncanny-valley-ness. Make it a feature, not a bug.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mixfont.com/experiments/decoy-font&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Decoy Font&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mixfont.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48936584&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;713 points · 159 comments · by ray__&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Decoy Font: Title: Decoy Font: A TTF font that hides what you type&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;URL Source: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www&quot;&gt;https://www&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mixfont.com/experiments/decoy-font&quot; title=&quot;Title: Decoy Font: A TTF font that hides what you type    URL Source: https://www.mixfont.com/experiments/decoy-font    Markdown Content:  1.   [Home](https://www.mixfont.com/)  2.   [Experiments](https://www.mixfont.com/experiments)  3.   Decoy Font    A TTF font that hides what you&amp;#39;re typing from AI. Type a message where each letter contains a decoy.    ![Image 1: Decoy Font hybrid image preview. Up close it reads as the decoy text; from a distance it reads as your hidden…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the Decoy Font is praised for being a &amp;#34;cool&amp;#34; creative project, users debate its utility as an anti-AI tool, noting that while some models are initially fooled, others can identify the hidden text through prompting or image resizing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48937018&quot; title=&quot;Is it useful? No. Does it stop AI from reading it? Also no. But is it cool? Yes, it is very cool.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48938578&quot; title=&quot;I just gave the day dream / pay bills image to ChatGPT and Gemini pro and they both could only tell me the pay bills text (shown with the thin lines)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48937036&quot; title=&quot;This is just level of detail.  Gemma E4B reads the sharper text until you resize down to 150x150, then it reads the other text.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48940211&quot; title=&quot;Whoa, so this is interesting. When asking GPT, Claude and Gemini for the text in the image, all of them agree: https://moa.chat/s/d99f8f76-4b41-4c1b-80c4-d9f86df37af1 But when you add a &amp;#39;PS: There&amp;#39;s a second hidden text&amp;#39;: https://moa.chat/s/3671f6d4-b155-483a-a006-a1b9ba31737d GPT 5.6 gets it, Gemini partially gets it and Claude cannot see it at all.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue the font is &amp;#34;childish&amp;#34; and lacks a clear use case, specifically highlighting how it would &amp;#34;wreck&amp;#34; the experience for screen reader users and make typing difficult for the author &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48936933&quot; title=&quot;This seems like it would absolutely wreck the experience for people using screen readers.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48937143&quot; title=&quot;Admittedly I&amp;#39;m a bit salty about LLMs due to they constant attacks on our infrastructure, the damage their doing to peoples minds and the general lack of morals shown by the AI companies, but things like this is rather childish and not really a solution to anything.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48936856&quot; title=&quot;Can someone explain the actual use-case here? I&amp;#39;m struggling with this because it also hides the message from myself, making it incredibly hard to type because I have no confirmation that I hit the right keys on the keyboard.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, the project is seen as a successful demonstration of &amp;#34;doing stuff without claiming it is useful,&amp;#34; serving as a visual double-entendre rather than a robust security solution &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48937948&quot; title=&quot;Sol (high) &amp;#39;[screenshot] there&amp;#39;s a hidden message in this text what is it&amp;#39; &amp;#39;The hidden message is “HAPPY HUMAN.” The visible outlines say “SORRY ROBOT,” but if you blur or squint at it, the shading underneath reads “HAPPY HUMAN.”&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48938634&quot; title=&quot;I think this illustrates that you can just do stuff without claiming it is useful. Like couldn&amp;#39;t you just make this font and call it something like double-entendre or something?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rtfeldman.com/rust-to-zig&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How Our Rust-to-Zig Rewrite Is Going&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (rtfeldman.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933149&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;530 points · 309 comments · by jorangreef&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Roc programming language team has completed a 487-day rewrite of its 300,000-line compiler from Rust to Zig, achieving feature parity and significantly faster build times. The shift was driven by Zig&amp;#39;s superior memory control, allocator-based ecosystem, and better handling of the compiler&amp;#39;s pervasive memory-unsafe operations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rtfeldman.com/rust-to-zig&quot; title=&quot;Title: How Our Rust-to-Zig Rewrite is Going    URL Source: https://rtfeldman.com/rust-to-zig    Markdown Content:  * * *    For the past year and a half, the team building [Roc](https://www.roc-lang.org/)&amp;#39;s compiler has been rewriting our 300,000 lines of Rust code into [Zig](https://ziglang.org/), for reasons I&amp;#39;ll recap below. We recently passed an exciting milestone: feature parity with the original compiler!    Since the Bun project recently shared [an experience…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether a compiler&amp;#39;s core task of emitting machine code truly necessitates memory-unsafe operations, with several experts arguing that such tasks can be handled via abstract data structures unless performing specialized functions like hot reloading &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48935805&quot; title=&quot;I think this is a fine post. But one comment: &amp;gt; remember that for compilers which emit machine code, like roc and rustc, doing memory-unsafe things is a big part of the job I don&amp;#39;t really think that this is true, in the way that it&amp;#39;s written. I think that for the hot binary patching / code reloading features, yes, that is going to need unsafe. But for regular old &amp;#39;producing an executable&amp;#39; compilation? Emitting machine code isn&amp;#39;t the part that requires unsafe. The language&amp;#39;s runtime is a more…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48936187&quot; title=&quot;Yeah that is definitely 1000% wrong. A compiler can do its job with totally abstract data structures. If anything would need to do unsafe stuff in memory, it would probably be a linker.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48936612&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; probably be a linker I don&amp;#39;t think that&amp;#39;s any different either. The core job of linking isn&amp;#39;t particularly unsafe. (Unless, similarly, you&amp;#39;re doing the hot reloading stuff)&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48936741&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve noticed that people equate &amp;#39;low level stuff&amp;#39; with unsafe, regardless of whether it&amp;#39;s contextually justified.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While Zig’s incremental build speed is praised as a &amp;#34;killer feature,&amp;#34; some participants question if Rust will eventually close this gap or if a borrow checker could ever be retrofitted onto Zig &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48935185&quot; title=&quot;Zig&amp;#39;s incremental builds are DEFINITELY a killer feature.  In the short term, I could see why you&amp;#39;d make a switch to get it. But, in the medium term, can we really not expect to see this in Rust in the somewhat near future? I want to go fast, but I don&amp;#39;t want to go fast just to shoot my foot off. If only somehow we could get Rust&amp;#39;s safety with all of Zig&amp;#39;s features and Go&amp;#39;s runtime without GC... That&amp;#39;s what I&amp;#39;m working on building [=&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48935734&quot; title=&quot;Instead of waiting for faster compiler in Rust, how about from the other direction, adding some kind of borrow checker to Zig? That sounds more within reach and practically achievable, possibly even in userland.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others contend that borrow checking is too deeply integrated into a language&amp;#39;s fundamental design to be added as an afterthought &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48936455&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s impossible to add a borrow checker to any existing language. The reason Rust has a working borrow checker is because every part of the language from structs, enum, traits, generics and all the way to the syntax itself has been designed to support lifetimes and borrow checking. It&amp;#39;s is not something you can just tack on to an existing language without fundamentally changing it.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theocharis.dev/blog/llm-critics-are-right-i-use-llms-anyway/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The LLM Critics Are Right. I Use LLMs Anyway&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theocharis.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933310&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;309 points · 305 comments · by JeremyTheo&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Despite agreeing with critics regarding AI &amp;#34;slop,&amp;#34; ethical concerns, and environmental impacts, the author argues that LLMs are essential tools for supercharging human thought and productivity when used with rigorous skepticism and techniques like &amp;#34;grilling&amp;#34; models to ensure human intent remains the driving force. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theocharis.dev/blog/llm-critics-are-right-i-use-llms-anyway/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The LLM Critics Are Right. I Use LLMs Anyway.    URL Source: https://www.theocharis.dev/blog/llm-critics-are-right-i-use-llms-anyway/    Markdown Content:  2026-07-15    I almost agree with all of the LLM critics, yet I still use LLMs a lot. I know this sounds like I am delusional, and I also feel like that sometimes because of this dissonance, but I don’t think I am alone with it.    This week I was at Local-First Conf in Berlin, and the dissonance was everywhere. Armin Ronacher had just given a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether the immediate productivity gains of LLMs—which some argue are consistently overestimated by developers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933938&quot; title=&quot;I will just point out the benefit is not as obvious as you think. Developers have consistently overestimated LLM productivity gains, which still seems true for agentic AI: https://metr.org/blog/2026-05-11-ai-usage-survey/ It is particularly striking how similar the results are to LLMs before agents. Along with the total absence of long-term data, I think the benefit can be (weakly) denied. Maybe not in the employmemt marketplace, but certainly for myself.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934072&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I will just point out the benefit is not as obvious as you think. Developers have consistently overestimated LLM I think there are two different claims here: - developers overestimate productivity gains, which is a solid finding in many of these studies. Skepticism of extremely large productivity gains is warranted and I flatly disbelieve &amp;#39;10x uplift&amp;#39; claims. - LLMs give no productivity uplift at all, which is much harder to defend. A repeat of the famous METR RCT study did find evidence of…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;—justify the potential long-term &amp;#34;atrophy&amp;#34; of critical thinking and engineering skills &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933518&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; LLM’s amplify what you already have: opinions, structure, frameworks. So far, so agreeable, but… &amp;gt; If you have thoughts, they come out sharper and faster. I can’t help but wonder whether constant use of “agent” harnesses will lead to an atrophy of the software engineering (or really any field) muscles. Actual muscles need exercise to stay in shape (let alone grow), so does the brain. Can we really be sure that thoughts, opinions, taste will still come out sharper and faster after five, ten,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933870&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I can’t help but wonder whether constant use of “agent” harnesses will lead to an atrophy of the software engineering (or really any field) muscles. It will, but I&amp;#39;m not sure the impact of this will be all too great. We suffer from not knowing how to use an abacus because we have a calculator, and people who feel a pull to keep their low-level chops up will do so anyway.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934070&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; a genuinely good tool that enriches your thinking A smartphone is also a genuinely good all-around tool. Even social media is a genuinely good tool for connecting people. Yet, I feel like we&amp;#39;ve been overly optimistic about the impact of said tools on us and our societies in the past two decades. Smartphones are so good, in fact, in some societies, half of us are addicted to them. Billions of people world-wide. I ask myself: Will LLMs enrich my thinking in the long run, or will they ruin it?…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find LLMs sharpen their existing frameworks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933518&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; LLM’s amplify what you already have: opinions, structure, frameworks. So far, so agreeable, but… &amp;gt; If you have thoughts, they come out sharper and faster. I can’t help but wonder whether constant use of “agent” harnesses will lead to an atrophy of the software engineering (or really any field) muscles. Actual muscles need exercise to stay in shape (let alone grow), so does the brain. Can we really be sure that thoughts, opinions, taste will still come out sharper and faster after five, ten,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others warn that &amp;#34;agentic&amp;#34; workflows can lead to a loss of deep project understanding &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48935235&quot; title=&quot;I think the real disaster is that once you let the LLM work on a project for a bit, you start to lose understanding of what exactly is even happening under the hood in the project. You can take steps to mitigate this, but agents don&amp;#39;t exactly encourage the behavior required to maintain a good understanding of what&amp;#39;s going on.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt; and create maintenance burdens that offset minor efficiency boosts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934246&quot; title=&quot;Specifically my claim is &amp;#39;the relatively minor productivity uplift I would personally get out of agentic development is offset by the high cost, along with unresolved questions about long-term code maintainability, so I am not convinced that it is actually beneficial.&amp;#39; IMO the bigger problem is that ~1.5x individual dev productivity uplift seems to translate into 1.05x uplift across the team. People have been waaaaayyyyy too overconfident about this stuff.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, the community is divided on whether these tools will enrich human thought or result in a societal outsourcing of cognition similar to the addictive nature of smartphones &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934070&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; a genuinely good tool that enriches your thinking A smartphone is also a genuinely good all-around tool. Even social media is a genuinely good tool for connecting people. Yet, I feel like we&amp;#39;ve been overly optimistic about the impact of said tools on us and our societies in the past two decades. Smartphones are so good, in fact, in some societies, half of us are addicted to them. Billions of people world-wide. I ask myself: Will LLMs enrich my thinking in the long run, or will they ruin it?…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2026-07-16/spacex-stock-erases-gains-slides-below-ipo-price-in-intraday-trading&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SpaceX stock erases all its gains and slides below IPO price in intraday trading&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (latimes.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933344&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;312 points · 282 comments · by 1vuio0pswjnm7&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SpaceX shares fell below their $135 IPO price for the first time on Wednesday, erasing early gains from the company&amp;#39;s record-breaking public offering as investor concerns grow over spending and debt despite its expansion into artificial intelligence. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2026-07-16/spacex-stock-erases-gains-slides-below-ipo-price-in-intraday-trading&quot; title=&quot;Title: SpaceX stock erases gains, slides below IPO price in intraday trading - Los Angeles Times    URL Source: https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2026-07-16/spacex-stock-erases-gains-slides-below-ipo-price-in-intraday-trading    Published Time: 2026-07-16T10:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  *     [News](https://www.latimes.com/)        *   [Home Page](https://www.latimes.com/)      *   [California](https://www.latimes.com/california)      *   [Election…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SpaceX IPO is characterized by some as a calculated &amp;#34;scam&amp;#34; designed for venture capital exits, citing irrational fundamentals and lobbying efforts to bypass standard NASDAQ listing rules &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934113&quot; title=&quot;“Shocking nobody” I would add… This is an obvious Musk scam and anyone with financial knowledge called it as such ever since it’s been on the table. Why else lobby and change the NASDAQ listing rules for instance?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933677&quot; title=&quot;The IPO was meant for the VCs to cash out as all fundamentals were completely irrational, but seems like no one cares about cash flow and profitability anymore during QE times. Dumb money will keep being dumb I guess&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934742&quot; title=&quot;Many IPOs slide below their initial offering. Very few IPOs changed the rules to allow themselves to be incuded in significant indexes far faster than the rules previously allowed, and then slipped below their initial offering.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Others argue the price drop is typical for IPOs and reflects &amp;#34;great financial engineering&amp;#34; rather than fraud, suggesting the valuation is simply a byproduct of aggressive capital formation and shifting buyer profiles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934215&quot; title=&quot;I don’t think scam is the right word. The valuation and bank price targets are absolutely insane. I myself could never invest at those multiples. I think they absolutely have governance problems but at the same time I have to admit he is a great financial engineer. Investors who do have conviction here most likely see this as the platform vehicle for everything else coming through the pipeline. Again I could not buy into that but I think it’s a far cry from a scam.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934310&quot; title=&quot;This is shaped like more-or-less every IPO I&amp;#39;ve seen. I think you have to wait for more of a collapse to claim dispositive evidence of a scam (or widen your claim to &amp;#39;almost all IPOs are scams&amp;#39;).&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934422&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;re perfectly consistent. An absured valuation isn&amp;#39;t evidence of fraud. Exceptional capital formation isn&amp;#39;t fraud either. You&amp;#39;re conflating overpriced, good at raising money and scam as if they&amp;#39;re synonyms. I am curious how the absurd bank price targets will play out in the long-term and if there will be any repercussions but its hard to immediately jump to scam but I realize this is the favorite fan-fic for folks on both sides.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934041&quot; title=&quot;Is it possible that people who don&amp;#39;t care about short term profitability but still want a strategic ownership of the company bought at a high price on IPO day and now that the day traders are in, speculation will readjust the price to short term values? The change of price just reflect the different buyer profiles. SpaceX is a pretty important company not just for &amp;#39;the market&amp;#39; but also for many other things (see Russia/Ukraine war). Fair warning: I know nothing about all this.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant point of contention is the company&amp;#39;s recent pivot to an AI-focused valuation following its merger with xAI, despite lacking a frontier model &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934253&quot; title=&quot;SpaceX, despite its name is an AI company, supposedly. Its S-1 states that the company estimates its total addressable market (TAM) at $28.5 trillion, of which $26.5 trillion, or 92.98%, is expected to come from AI. SpaceX is an AI company without a frontier model. Until Jan 2026 SpaceX was an aerospace company. Then xAI was merged into SpaceX on January 30, 2026, so SpaceX became an AI company less than 6 months ago.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/products/gemini-notebook/notebooklm-gemini-notebook/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;NotebookLM is now Gemini Notebook&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.google)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48936451&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;371 points · 185 comments · by xnx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google has rebranded NotebookLM as Gemini Notebook, introducing deeper integration across the Google ecosystem and a new secure cloud computer feature that allows the tool to execute code for advanced data analysis. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/products/gemini-notebook/notebooklm-gemini-notebook/&quot; title=&quot;Title: NotebookLM is now Gemini Notebook    URL Source: https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/products/gemini-notebook/notebooklm-gemini-notebook/    Published Time: 2026-07-16T16:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  [Skip to main content](https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/products/gemini-notebook/notebooklm-gemini-notebook/#jump-content)    [![Image 1: Google](https://blog.google/static/blogv2/images/super-g-aurora.svg?version=pr20260715-1455)](https://blog.google/ &amp;#39;News from Google&amp;#39;)  NotebookLM is…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rebranding of NotebookLM to Gemini Notebook is viewed by many as a predictable move in Google’s history of endless product repackaging and renaming &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48937000&quot; title=&quot;I wondered when the name change was coming as NotebookLM felt a bit out of place brand-wise.  Still would have been killer if they called it &amp;#39;Bard Notebook&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48937891&quot; title=&quot;I wondered when the name change was coming because this is Google: products be endlessly repackaged and renamed, some only to be killed later.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48938419&quot; title=&quot;I reckon the same dipshits responsible for Microsoft’s product naming in the early 2000s all moved on to Google to wreak the same havoc there.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find the tool&amp;#39;s high context capacity impressive, there is significant frustration regarding Google&amp;#39;s perceived inability to outpace competitors like Anthropic and OpenAI despite their superior infrastructure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48937569&quot; title=&quot;I admonish Gemini and demand explanation nearly every day of how it&amp;#39;s possible that Google invented the thing, has the best infrastructure for inference, and somehow falls behind Anthropic and even OpenAI. NotebookLM is pretty cool since it can hold a ton of context but this is so far below my (and frankly just reasonable) expectations of Google. I downgraded my Gemini subscription and got Claude. Still can&amp;#39;t believe how much better it is. Fable is way better, that&amp;#39;s a given. But Claude even…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While the &amp;#34;podcast&amp;#34; format was initially a novelty, users are now seeking more interactive, &amp;#34;Socratic&amp;#34; learning methods or specialized tools for scientific papers that can handle math and pronunciation better than current offerings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48938375&quot; title=&quot;When notebookLM was new, it was interesting to listen to the podcasts. Then the novelty wore off, and I wanted something where I can interact with the podcasters but it was janky as hell. My current “audio-learning” hack is ChatGPT Live which has become shockingly good after being awful compared to Claude Voice   (Let’s not even talk about Gemini voice which is still bad). I go on a walk and dump a paper or article link in the chat, and ask chatGPT Live to walk me through the content in small…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48937720&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d like to have audio overviews of scientific papers, so I can &amp;#39;read&amp;#39; them while I drive. NotebookLM/Gemini Notebook sorta does this, but the two-person podcast format is kind of annoying and it can&amp;#39;t pronounce math. Is there something out there that will do this? I&amp;#39;m sure the right harness around frontier models would make it work.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48938850&quot; title=&quot;Me: Ok so I&amp;#39;m going on a walk. I&amp;#39;ll dump a link to a Hacker News         discussion about an article.       You have to read the article and the discussion and walk me thru         all the interesting details, nugget by nugget, and move on when       I&amp;#39;m ready for the next piece. ChatGPT Live: ok, Great show me the link, I&amp;#39;m waiting. (I paste the link) Me: Ok I pasted it. Now go. ==== For the Socratic quiz I say: I want to understand this more deeply. So instead of you just telling me     …&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://joinedanthropic.com&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;At least 105 past YC founders have worked at OpenAI and Anthropic&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (joinedanthropic.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931588&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;302 points · 220 comments · by ohong&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More than 100 former Y Combinator founders, including high-profile CEOs like Sam Altman and Emmett Shear, have transitioned from their own startups to roles at AI giants OpenAI and Anthropic. &lt;a href=&quot;https://joinedanthropic.com&quot; title=&quot;Title: Where YC Founders Went Next: OpenAI and Anthropic — Startups.RIP    URL Source: https://joinedanthropic.com/    Markdown Content:  Each ribbon is one founder&amp;#39;s journey. Hover over to see what they built and where they went.[Did we get something wrong?](https://x.com/oscrhong)    ## Who they are &amp;amp; what they built    Last updated: July 14, 2026.    Swipe to explore the table    YC founders who later joined OpenAI or Anthropic. Sortable by every column. Activate a column header to sort; activate it…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The concentration of YC founders at OpenAI and Anthropic is viewed by some as a negligible statistic given the total founder pool &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48932859&quot; title=&quot;Based on YC&amp;#39;s directory, there are approximately 13,000 YC founders since YC started. 105/13000 is a very small number to focus on. This data doesn&amp;#39;t really mean anything.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, while others see it as evidence of a &amp;#34;tiered&amp;#34; industry class system where former founders leverage their status to capture massive capital inflows &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48932691&quot; title=&quot;Effectively, industry roles are a tiered system which determines access to the cashflow. Going the YC founder route is a much faster and more efficient way to secure a high tier than climbing the SWE ladder. The whole thing resembles a kind of mini class system, with high tiers granting access to generational wealth, and low tiers being better off than the average non-industry Joe. Once you&amp;#39;re in the high tier, there&amp;#39;s no way to fall anymore, you just move wherever the cash is being pumped in,…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue this migration represents a massive opportunity cost, diverting human capital from diverse research into a potentially fragile AI bubble that prioritizes corporate profit over social utility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934547&quot; title=&quot;Whatever you think of AI for your own work, the fact that the entire economy is betting everything on it is really concerning. It’s not just the fact that it may not work well economically speaking and would end up with a market crash, or all the negative externalities from AI development, it’s also the opportunity cost we are paying. With so much human capital and resources dedicated to developing and running LLMs all the other business, research opportunities aren’t being explored and…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48935133&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not even sure that I do prefer the AI train to the social media / ad train. I certainly would if the direction was &amp;#39;we&amp;#39;re throwing ourselves blindly in AI so to gradually free citizens from the need to work&amp;#39;, but right now it&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;we&amp;#39;re throwing ourselves blindly in AI so that we can sacrifice workers for higher corporate profits&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48935264&quot; title=&quot;Not to mention how they will be used by terrorists and evil people to create biological weapons and other tools of mass slaughter. Or how it will be/is being used by criminals to target vulnerable people and businesses. Or how coupled with drone warfare the world becomes an unlivable hellhole in the next decade. But Marc Andreesan said only losers are against “tech accelerationiism” on twitter so here we are. Edit: all that and spellcheck still sucks too.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, the trend of high-level leaders and Nobel laureates moving into individual contributor roles suggests a genuine, widespread belief in Silicon Valley that these companies are on the verge of achieving AGI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933534&quot; title=&quot;What I find more interesting is how many people have left big orgs where they had major leadership roles, to become ICs at Anthropic.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933865&quot; title=&quot;Well yeah, but being a CTO at a major org isn&amp;#39;t exactly a low-paying gig. The interesting thing to me is that the belief that Anthropic is going achieve something like AGI appears to have really spread through SV. If not AGI, at least greatly disturb their old cushy SaaS jobs. Also, I still do believe some people just want to work on &amp;#39;cool&amp;#39; stuff. edit: not just CTOs and CPOs, I mean John freakin Jumper,  who got the 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, left his VP role at DeepMind to have no…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lmstudio.ai/blog/introducing-lm-studio-bionic&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LM Studio Bionic: the AI agent for open models&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lmstudio.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48939662&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;329 points · 130 comments · by minimaxir&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LM Studio has launched Bionic, an AI agent for open-source models that features local voice transcription, agentic coding tools, and document processing with a commitment to zero data retention. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lmstudio.ai/blog/introducing-lm-studio-bionic&quot; title=&quot;Title: Introducing LM Studio Bionic: the AI agent for open models    URL Source: https://lmstudio.ai/blog/introducing-lm-studio-bionic    Published Time: 2026-07-16    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: LM Studio Bionic](https://lmstudio.ai/assets/marketing/blog/introducing-lm-studio-bionic/Bionic-Cover-blogimage.png)    **Today, we&amp;#39;re taking the biggest leap forward in LM Studio&amp;#39;s evolution. Meet LM Studio Bionic, the AI agent made for open models.**    Bionic is the AI agent for getting real work done with…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide between users who value LM Studio&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;plug-and-play&amp;#34; ease of use &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48940437&quot; title=&quot;Built to work with lmstudio, one of the leading easy to use local model servers. LMStudio is the closest to plug-and-play without sacrificing play that I&amp;#39;ve seen; a harness that works well with it is nothing to sniff at. Its not earth shattering either.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt; and those concerned by its closed-source nature and VC-backed business model &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48940481&quot; title=&quot;A friendly reminder that both LM Studio app and now this new LM Studio Bionic app are closed source. Since most people are unaware of this fact.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48941539&quot; title=&quot;I’m worried about the switch in business model here, which is part of the reason I just switched to LM Studio from Ollama. &amp;gt; use the largest frontier open source models through LM Studio Secure Cloud&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48941789&quot; title=&quot;Any VC-backed company will eventually pivot.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that closed-source software is not inherently scandalous &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48940525&quot; title=&quot;And? Is that a scandal?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, critics suggest alternatives like Unsloth Studio for those prioritizing transparency and social progress &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48941673&quot; title=&quot;Use Unsloth Studio, it&amp;#39;s actually open source and I trust Unsloth via their quantized models a lot more than LM Studio.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48940545&quot; title=&quot;some people want to make money, others want to improve social progress. Happy to clarify which is who and who is which.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Meanwhile, others question the long-term viability of third-party harnesses as Apple and other major OS providers integrate similar local AI capabilities directly into their platforms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48940712&quot; title=&quot;This kind of thing just makes me think Apple will get to a point where they have good enough local models and good enough harnesses for doing things, and most normal people will just use them… Does the LLM become another interface to computing?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.lyc8503.net/en/post/llm-classifier/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Detecting LLM-Generated Texts with “Classical” Machine Learning&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.lyc8503.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48936880&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;246 points · 173 comments · by uneven9434&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer created a robust AI-generated text detector using &amp;#34;classical&amp;#34; machine learning (TF-IDF and LinearSVC) that achieves approximately 85% accuracy, revealing that over 30% of trending web fiction on platforms like Lofter is likely AI-generated despite the content being presented as human-written. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.lyc8503.net/en/post/llm-classifier/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Detecting LLM-Generated Web Fiction with &amp;#39;Classical&amp;#39; Machine Learning (AIGC Text Detection)    URL Source: https://blog.lyc8503.net/en/post/llm-classifier/    Published Time: 2026-03-01T10:32:04.000Z    Markdown Content:  This article is currently an experimental machine translation and may contain errors. If anything is unclear, please refer to the original Chinese version. I am continuously working to improve the translation.    ## [](https://blog.lyc8503.net/en/post/llm-classifier/#TL-DR-Demo…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Debaters disagree on whether text contains enough information density to reliably signal its provenance, with some dismissing detection as &amp;#34;tarot card reading&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48937377&quot; title=&quot;Text is simply not information dense enough to be able to decode some arbitrary signal of provenance from it. Sure you might be able to detect today&amp;#39;s tells (particular sentence structures preferred by Claude, phrases, etc) to get you some arbitrary chance percentage it was machine generated, but it&amp;#39;s a bad fiction to perpetuate that any of this is anything more than tarot card reading. Images, absolutely, there are tell-tale artifacts from today&amp;#39;s generators that simply aren&amp;#39;t emitted by…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; while others point to current tools like Pangram that maintain extremely low false-positive rates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48939447&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Text is simply not information dense enough to be able to decode some arbitrary signal of provenance from it...it&amp;#39;s a bad fiction to perpetuate that any of this is anything more than tarot card reading.&amp;#39; Not true at all. Pangram is highly effective and has a very low false positive rate. The post here is impressive for a small project, it looks like they independently thought of one of the core ideas Pangram uses of creating twins to compare. You can see how it works here:…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48938636&quot; title=&quot;All of that may be true, but pangram currently has a false positive rate of about 1 in 10000, and this has been tested by feeding in thousands of texts written before 2020. That may not last if AI companies start trying to build models that fool it, but for the time being at least, modern models do have strong tells.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. A core consensus exists that commercial LLMs currently produce &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; optimized for engagement, creating distinct patterns that are easy to spot automatically &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48937570&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; but it&amp;#39;s a bad fiction to perpetuate that any of this is anything more than tarot card reading. Hard disagree. LLMs (especially base ones, that only received pre-training) can produce output that is undistinguishable from human writing (because that&amp;#39;s what they were trained to do). But commercial chat models are specifically tuned in a way that maximizes user engagement.   It&amp;#39;s that specific tuning that is very easy to spot when reading AI slop, and that&amp;#39;s not surprising that it&amp;#39;s easy to spot…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48938870&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The first is that it would still misclassify human-authored text written under the same incentive, and most people have various incentives to &amp;#39;maximize engagement&amp;#39;. The thing is, humans are significantly worse at maximizing numerical goals than computers. &amp;gt; And the second is that then people would just make other models that are tuned for defeating that sort of classifier, which would be used whenever the classifier is being used. Anyone can already do that right now, just grab unsloth studio…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue this is a losing arms race, as detection models will eventually be used to train more stealthy LLMs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48938569&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; But commercial chat models are specifically tuned in a way that maximizes user engagement. It&amp;#39;s that specific tuning that is very easy to spot when reading AI slop, and that&amp;#39;s not surprising that it&amp;#39;s easy to spot automatically either. There are two problems with this. The first is that it would still misclassify human-authored text written under the same incentive, and most people have various incentives to &amp;#39;maximize engagement&amp;#39;. And the second is that then people would just make other…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48937690&quot; title=&quot;I think the fundamental problem is that training current SOTA AI models is very expensive. If a simple &amp;#39;classical&amp;#39; model can detect them, presumably at much lower algorithmic cost, then why wouldn&amp;#39;t the model trainers use these same tools to feed back into their models to improve them at low cost to make them better? It&amp;#39;s an arms race. Any cheap pattern can and presumably will be used to retrain if it becomes and effective way to catch AI.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, leading some to suggest shifting focus toward measuring &amp;#34;effort&amp;#34; or verifying human authorship through cryptographically signed edit histories &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48938293&quot; title=&quot;I think figuring out if a text is AI-made is a losing battle. What could work is gauging how much effort went into writing the text, regardless of who the author might be. What&amp;#39;s easy today is generating mountains of text that are extremely hard to read. What requires effort is knowing how to engage the reader, how to keep out extraneous information, and how to keep the text as short as possible without losing details. That needs effort, with or without AI.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48938579&quot; title=&quot;The easiest way is to keep track of the text&amp;#39;s edit history, keeping a block of edits over time and having them signed by a timestamp authority. The final edit history can then be inspected by some external authority, then signed if the edit history looks human. I have a blog post from 2023 on this topic: https://helbl.ing/Written-Proof-of-Work/ For Google Doc users, you can already inspect the edit history over time to verify that text is written by a human.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ente.com/open/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ente – Opening Our Books&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ente.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48932697&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;287 points · 110 comments · by Sherex&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ente has made its business metrics public, providing real-time transparency into the company’s revenue, total number of registered accounts, and active paid subscribers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ente.com/open/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Ente – Open    URL Source: https://ente.com/open/    Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.    Markdown Content:  [Pricing](https://ente.com/#pricing)[Blog](https://ente.com/blog)[About](https://ente.com/about)[Download](https://ente.com/download)[Help](https://ente.com/help)    [27 k](https://github.com/ente/ente)    ## is open    We just made our business metrics public - revenue, customers, and accounts, all out in the open.[Vishnu&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While many users praise Ente&amp;#39;s high-quality art direction and customer service &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934320&quot; title=&quot;I have been impressed with Ente products and customer service. It&amp;#39;s good to see they are growing. That said, revenue information is not entirely helpful in a vacuum. I&amp;#39;d be more keen on seeing profit (even at a lower timeline resolution). What&amp;#39;s the average cost for taking on a new customer? What&amp;#39;s the retention/turnover? Etc. That said the products are great and I&amp;#39;d recommend them to anyone.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934189&quot; title=&quot;Kinda unrelated, but the art direction on Ente&amp;#39;s site is really top-notch.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934396&quot; title=&quot;I came to the comments to say the same thing! I would love to take a seminar or a class from the folks in their design department.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, the disclosure of revenue and account numbers has sparked a debate over whether this constitutes genuine transparency. Critics argue that revenue alone is a &amp;#34;vanity&amp;#34; metric that obscures a company&amp;#39;s true health, which would require sharing operating expenses, profit, and cash flow &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934103&quot; title=&quot;This is one of those vanity blog posts, a “look at us, we’re open” blog posts without actual openness, or rather, limited openness where it helps their image and not openness that could backfire. Businesses don’t operate based on revenue.  They operate based on profit. They operate based on operating expenses. They operate based off of free cash flow.  Showing off revenue and number of accounts is showing off a tiny portion of the picture, and says nothing about the health of a business. If…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934320&quot; title=&quot;I have been impressed with Ente products and customer service. It&amp;#39;s good to see they are growing. That said, revenue information is not entirely helpful in a vacuum. I&amp;#39;d be more keen on seeing profit (even at a lower timeline resolution). What&amp;#39;s the average cost for taking on a new customer? What&amp;#39;s the retention/turnover? Etc. That said the products are great and I&amp;#39;d recommend them to anyone.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933752&quot; title=&quot;This is so cool. Congratulations! Have you considered opening operating costs as well?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, some users report that Ente’s technical performance, specifically in facial recognition and semantic search, lags behind competitors like Immich &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934554&quot; title=&quot;I wish I could say the same. I tried Ente the other day, to see how it compares to Immich, but it was very hit-and-miss. Face recognition for people never worked, no matter what I tried, for example.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934964&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m in the same boat. I had a so many comments under Immich videos about Ente that it made me wonder if they were just bots. The client / server relationship with Ente is peculiar, and on my test dataset of about 1000 images did not perform at all. Face recognition, semantic search, etc, it was not in the same league as Immich tbh. (Also hi Stavros!)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://madcampos.dev/blog/2026/07/accessibility-from-scratch/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;If you want to create a button from scratch, you must first create the universe&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (madcampos.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48930136&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;246 points · 130 comments · by treve&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article demonstrates the immense complexity of recreating a native HTML button from scratch, arguing that developers should use semantic HTML to ensure accessibility, keyboard interaction, and form integration without maintaining hundreds of lines of redundant code. &lt;a href=&quot;https://madcampos.dev/blog/2026/07/accessibility-from-scratch/&quot; title=&quot;Title: If you want to create a button from scratch, you must first create the universe | Marco Campos Blog    URL Source: https://madcampos.dev/blog/2026/07/accessibility-from-scratch/    Published Time: 2026-07-15T04:22:16.552Z    Markdown Content:  The title is a tongue-in-cheek parody of a [quote from Carl Sagan(External link)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4VIc8Qt5xM).     And it ties in very well with the thought exercise we are doing today.    When we start learning about web accessibility the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate centers on the inefficiency of modern web development, where developers frequently recreate native OS widgets, often resulting in interfaces that are 20% slower to use than default buttons &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48930863&quot; title=&quot;I sometimes wonder how much slower technological progression would have been, if we hadn&amp;#39;t taken whatever widget engine any given OS gave us, and instead constantly debated over and recreated every feature in the OS, like we do with web interfaces. The crazies part is that when we actually research it, a default button is about 20% faster than the the flat nonsense we&amp;#39;ve settled on ( https://www.theregister.com/offbeat/2017/09/05/its-official-... ) and nearly a decade letter we still prefer…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that missing native HTML elements like server-side filtered comboboxes necessitate these custom implementations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48930541&quot; title=&quot;Great satire but let&amp;#39;s create that same for combobox with server side filtering. Now you have problem because it&amp;#39;s not possible with native HTML elements. Many re-implementations are result of missing native elements.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others blame Apple for stifling progress by blocking custom element extensions and native standards &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48930786&quot; title=&quot;Correct me if I’m wrong, but my understanding is Google would love to make more web standards native (including selectors which have improved on chrome but are basically broken on safari) but Apple holds back progress in a (borderline?) anticompetitive way&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48930958&quot; title=&quot;My understanding is Apple / Webkit is blocking custom element extension on native HTML elements, which would cut down this 500 line monster to: class SaganButton extends HTMLButtonElement { … } Anyone know the reasoning they’re blocking this?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The conversation also highlights the decline of Flash/AIR, with disagreements over whether its garbage collection and performance were superior to modern JS or merely viewed through &amp;#34;rose-tinted glasses&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48930980&quot; title=&quot;This is really an Apple thing, rigidly enforcing whatever their current OS aesthetic looks like. But Apple (or Xerox) invented the UI paradigms we&amp;#39;re still living with. Look at the progress of Flash/AIR AS3  as an embedded runtime prior to its annihilation. By 2010 or so, it had the capability to leverage the GPU on pretty much any device, directly uploading bitmaps and shaders. It had garbage collection as good as or better than any existing [modern] JS engine, had strong types and compile…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48932232&quot; title=&quot;Better garbage collection than current runtimes?  Now this is surely rose tinted glasses, probably based on nostalgia. It had horrific performance all around. Even the now obsolete Opera browser Kestrel runtime had better JS performance, and it is obsolete because Chrome crushed it in benchmarks consistently for several years.  No, there&amp;#39;s no way Flash had the performance characteristics you mention, even less in a critical component like the garbage collector.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, some participants view the current focus on manual accessibility and component building as a &amp;#34;racket&amp;#34; or a soon-to-be-obsolete practice, predicting that AI will eventually handle both compliance and the generation of custom frameworks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48930865&quot; title=&quot;Just coming off a wild ride where a client was sued by a non-customer and a rapacious legal firm, who claimed that said client&amp;#39;s website was not sufficiently accessible. The day after the lawsuit was filed, a company specializing in accessibility testing mysteriously contacted the client, offering a solution. Client had not even gotten notice of the litigation yet. The net result of this was several tens of thousands of dollars spent actually removing Aria tags and using standard modern HTML on…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48930694&quot; title=&quot;This would have been a very smart and useful article up until 3 years ago. Now with AI doing this work is a minute, with most if not all considerations baked in, if some strange quirk would need it. Frameworks and dependencies made and replaced by custom &amp;#39;ground-up&amp;#39; creations is now a plausible reality. Not necessarily useful but doable and most importantly, testable in a fraction of time. We should readjust our sensibilities to that.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hyperallergic.com/guerrilla-london-bus-ads-mock-kylie-jenners-meta-glasses-campaign/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Guerrilla London bus ads mock Kylie Jenner’s Meta glasses campaign&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (hyperallergic.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48930011&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;204 points · 160 comments · by decimalenough&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The UK activism group Everyone Hates Elon installed guerrilla spoof advertisements in London mocking Kylie Jenner’s Meta glasses campaign to protest privacy concerns and the potential for non-consensual surveillance. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hyperallergic.com/guerrilla-london-bus-ads-mock-kylie-jenners-meta-glasses-campaign/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Guerrilla London Bus Ads Mock Kylie Jenner’s Meta Glasses Campaign    URL Source: https://hyperallergic.com/guerrilla-london-bus-ads-mock-kylie-jenners-meta-glasses-campaign/    Published Time: 2026-07-15T18:51:53.000Z    Markdown Content:  [News](https://hyperallergic.com/tag/news/)  “Billionaires could fund cures for cancer — so why are they funding glasses for perverts instead?” asked the protest group Everyone Hates Elon.    [![Image 1: Rhea…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion reflects a deep divide between those who view smart glasses as a &amp;#34;creepy&amp;#34; intrusion into privacy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48930199&quot; title=&quot;glassholes never change&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48930485&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand why Meta is so insistent on making the camera and creepy video recording the primary feature of these glasses. They do have a ton of other uses. The speakers are genuinely great. It&amp;#39;s useful to be able to hear notifications while walking. Having a decent AI for asking random questions is nice as well. It supports live translation. And unlike Airpods it doesn&amp;#39;t tune out the rest of the world, which I like. And the new models have a display, which could be useful for stuff like…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt; and those who see them as a logical evolution of mobile technology that could enhance safety or navigation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48930270&quot; title=&quot;Help me understand this attitude, because I&amp;#39;ve mostly seen women wearing these types of products, and they stand to gain a lot in terms of security from wearing them. So why the ad hominems? What is your best argument against these devices? When I go to a coffee shop I do so with the understanding that the establishment is likely recording me, are we going to accept this same rhetoric for anyone that films others in public and/or commercial spaces?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48930283&quot; title=&quot;Well, I kinda wouldn&amp;#39;t mind glasses that could show important notifications or maps. It could be handy for lots of things, like a heads up display. Not to watch the social feeds but to find my way or read a message from a friend saying they&amp;#39;re late. When I use my phone or watch to navigate it&amp;#39;s a bit more dangerous. Thinking specifically of one time when I fell badly doing just that. I absolutely wouldn&amp;#39;t want them to incorporate a camera though. They should not have one at all. And I would…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant point of consensus is the desire for a camera-free version of the device to enable features like heads-up maps, live translation, and notifications without the social stigma of constant recording &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48930283&quot; title=&quot;Well, I kinda wouldn&amp;#39;t mind glasses that could show important notifications or maps. It could be handy for lots of things, like a heads up display. Not to watch the social feeds but to find my way or read a message from a friend saying they&amp;#39;re late. When I use my phone or watch to navigate it&amp;#39;s a bit more dangerous. Thinking specifically of one time when I fell badly doing just that. I absolutely wouldn&amp;#39;t want them to incorporate a camera though. They should not have one at all. And I would…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48930485&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand why Meta is so insistent on making the camera and creepy video recording the primary feature of these glasses. They do have a ton of other uses. The speakers are genuinely great. It&amp;#39;s useful to be able to hear notifications while walking. Having a decent AI for asking random questions is nice as well. It supports live translation. And unlike Airpods it doesn&amp;#39;t tune out the rest of the world, which I like. And the new models have a display, which could be useful for stuff like…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that ubiquitous public filming is already an unstoppable reality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48930270&quot; title=&quot;Help me understand this attitude, because I&amp;#39;ve mostly seen women wearing these types of products, and they stand to gain a lot in terms of security from wearing them. So why the ad hominems? What is your best argument against these devices? When I go to a coffee shop I do so with the understanding that the establishment is likely recording me, are we going to accept this same rhetoric for anyone that films others in public and/or commercial spaces?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48930387&quot; title=&quot;People wearing cameras is going to increase over time, no matter what. Why would it slow down? Don&amp;#39;t get me wrong, I&amp;#39;m extremely anti a lot of things, including people wearing cameras all the time, but I see no logical way to stop it without stomping on freedoms. In this case, defense will be your ally, whatever form that may take,eg wearing a mask. If I had to choose between flock cameras and meta glasses existing, I&amp;#39;d choose the glasses.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others remain skeptical that the benefits, such as facial recognition for social context, outweigh the risks posed by bad actors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48930590&quot; title=&quot;The real killer app form me requires a camera (though it doesn’t need to record photos or video for me to access — I have a phone for that). I need a device that tells me who I’m talking to if I’ve been introduced to them before and tell me how I know them (This is Bob Dobbs, you first met him in Texas in 1985 and he saved you at that party when you needed some Slack)”.  Especially great when I meet someone out of context. But bad actors mean I’ll probably never get this prosthesis.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://atproto.com/blog/at-protocol-trademark&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bluesky Trademarks ATProto&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (atproto.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48929351&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;184 points · 139 comments · by chaosharmonic&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bluesky has acquired the &amp;#34;AT Protocol&amp;#34; trademark as a defensive measure to protect the developer ecosystem from legal threats and ensure the mark remains freely available for community use. &lt;a href=&quot;https://atproto.com/blog/at-protocol-trademark&quot; title=&quot;Title: AT Protocol Trademark - AT Protocol    URL Source: https://atproto.com/blog/at-protocol-trademark    Markdown Content:  Bluesky recently acquired the rights to the trademark for “ATPROTOCOL” and its variants—including “AT Protocol” and “atproto”—from another company that was threatening to take legal action preventing the company and others from using the term. Now that Bluesky owns it, the atproto community’s continued use of the mark can be protected.    Given the nature of what we’re trying…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The trademark acquisition is framed by Bluesky as a defensive move to protect the community from legal threats, with plans to eventually transfer ownership to an independent governance body &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48930037&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Bluesky recently acquired the rights to the trademark for “ATPROTOCOL” and its variants—including “AT Protocol” and “atproto”—from another company that was threatening to take legal action preventing the company and others from using the term. Now that Bluesky owns it, the atproto community’s continued use of the mark can be protected. The policy around usage is shared in the rest of the post but the goal is to make this very simple for everyone&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48930148&quot; title=&quot;There is an IETF Working Group these days https://atproto.com/blog/kicking-off-the-atp-working-group Those can&amp;#39;t register trademarks, of course. &amp;gt;  that also runs the only viable instance? This is false, both in the framing (&amp;#39;instances&amp;#39;) and in the viability of running alternative infrastructure.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue that ATProto suffers from inherent centralization, citing the difficulty of migrating identities (DIDs) and the network&amp;#39;s reliance on Bluesky-controlled infrastructure like the Public Ledger of Credentials &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48930315&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Only viable instance&amp;#39; is not really the correct framing - Bluesky doesn&amp;#39;t have instances . Anyone using ATProto without Bluesky will still be &amp;#39;on Bluesky&amp;#39;. When you go to bsky.app, you&amp;#39;re interacting with the Bluesky AppView ; one key feature of ATProto is that any AppView can interact with any (consenting) Personal Data Server (PDS). So you can self-host your PDS but still use bsky.app if you so choose. But critically, anyone can write an AppView; there are reimplementations of Bluesky as…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931379&quot; title=&quot;The nightmare of the Wsocial rollout is a testament of the massive control Bluesky has on the ATProto network. If Wsocial was on ActivityPub or Nostr nothing similar would have happened. ATProto has serious centralisation problems, baked into the design. And it makes sense, considering it came out of a Twitter R&amp;amp;D experiment to &amp;#39;decentralise&amp;#39; Twitter itself. Pure federation was never part of the initial design. ActivityPub and Nostr solve the issue already.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users prefer ActivityPub for its established decentralization, proponents of ATProto argue it solves a different set of problems by separating data hosting from application views, and point to its ongoing standardization through the IETF as a path toward true independence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48930315&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Only viable instance&amp;#39; is not really the correct framing - Bluesky doesn&amp;#39;t have instances . Anyone using ATProto without Bluesky will still be &amp;#39;on Bluesky&amp;#39;. When you go to bsky.app, you&amp;#39;re interacting with the Bluesky AppView ; one key feature of ATProto is that any AppView can interact with any (consenting) Personal Data Server (PDS). So you can self-host your PDS but still use bsky.app if you so choose. But critically, anyone can write an AppView; there are reimplementations of Bluesky as…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48932858&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Cool people use ActivityPub. ActivityPub solves a completely different (arguably, smaller) set of problems. This is like saying &amp;#39;Cool people use email instead of web&amp;#39;. I have a few diagrams here that may help see just how different they are: https://overreacted.io/there-are-no-instances-in-atproto/#so... &amp;gt;Single vendor owned &amp;amp; controlled standards always turn out badly, just a question when. Yeah, which is why atproto is going to IETF: https://atproto.com/blog/kicking-off-the-atp-working-group…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48932897&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;that also runs the only viable instance? This is a category error. There are no &amp;#39;instances&amp;#39; in atproto. https://overreacted.io/there-are-no-instances-in-atproto/ It segments the network differently (into &amp;#39;hosting&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;apps&amp;#39;), and on both axes anyone can run their independent app-agnostic hosting, as well as an independent hosting-agnostic app.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://immersivemath.com/ila/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Immersive Linear Algebra Book with Interactive Figures (2015)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (immersivemath.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48935951&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;290 points · 30 comments · by srean&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*Immersive Linear Algebra* is an interactive digital textbook that teaches fundamental concepts—including vectors, matrices, and Gaussian elimination—through the use of immersive, interactive figures. &lt;a href=&quot;https://immersivemath.com/ila/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Immersive Math    URL Source: https://immersivemath.com/ila/    Published Time: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 18:40:37 GMT    Markdown Content:  #### [Preface](https://immersivemath.com/ila/ch00_preface/preface.html)    A few words about this book.    #### [Chapter 1: Introduction](https://immersivemath.com/ila/ch01_introduction/ch01.html)    How to navigate, notation, and a recap of some math that we think you already know.    #### [Chapter 2: Vectors](https://immersivemath.com/ila/ch02_vectors/ch02.html)    The…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of an interactive linear algebra book sparked a debate over whether visual, &amp;#34;lightweight&amp;#34; versions of math ignore essential theorems and proofs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48939111&quot; title=&quot;Why are programmers always so attracted by these interactive/over-simplified/lightweight versions of linear algebra? They all focus on the visual aspects while ignoring the real stuff (theorems, proofs, etc.).&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some critics argue these resources are over-simplified for programmers, others point out that this specific book does include formal proofs and that intuitive visualizations are vital for building the &amp;#34;appetite&amp;#34; needed for advanced study &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48939792&quot; title=&quot;I don’t think they are simplified but they are an introduction course for sure. I think what’s usually missing is integrating (heh) linear algebra with calculus for solving more interesting problems but I think the audience for that needs to have a big appetite first. And those are hard to come by unless it’s pushed on you to finish your degree. And even then, people barely scrape by in those classes.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48939308&quot; title=&quot;Can you read your own writing? What makes someone a &amp;#39;programmer&amp;#39; vs a mathematician? If you suspended your arrogance for a few moments you might realize you&amp;#39;ve wasted our time with a question that answers itself. I mean it&amp;#39;s also a generalization of very little value. Is someone doing linear algebra in lean not doing &amp;#39;the real stuff&amp;#39;? What is a programmer to you? Your question is why do some people not follow an area that is tangential to them to the maximal extent? Or to some arbitrary level…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48939881&quot; title=&quot;Have you opened the book? There are both theorems and proofs there.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Many users expressed strong enthusiasm for the format, wishing similar interactive treatments existed for statistics, robotics, and geometry &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48937688&quot; title=&quot;I LOVE this book! Where was it when I was learning algebra, years ago?? Thanks for posting. I wish there were many other books done similarly. Selfishly, I&amp;#39;d love to see statistics, probability and advanced robotics displayed this way. &amp;lt;3 &amp;lt;3&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48937652&quot; title=&quot;lowkey wish I was in school again. this is so cool&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48940433&quot; title=&quot;Well there is: https://mathcs.clarku.edu/~djoyce/java/elements/elements.htm... for geometry. (previously I was noting a physics PDF set as well, but it&amp;#39;s apparently not well-grounded/is controversial)&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.openculture.com/2026/07/explore-1300-beautiful-wildlife-illustrations-from-the-19th-century.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1,300 Beautiful Wildlife Illustrations from the 19th Century Now Restored&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (openculture.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48929945&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;255 points · 50 comments · by gslin&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Designer Nicholas Rougeux has restored and digitized over 1,300 color illustrations from the 19th-century series *The Naturalist’s Library*, making the complete 40-volume collection of wildlife plates available for free online. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.openculture.com/2026/07/explore-1300-beautiful-wildlife-illustrations-from-the-19th-century.html&quot; title=&quot;Explore 1,300+ Beautiful Wildlife Illustrations from the 19th Century, Now Restored and Available Online    Today, if you want to know about any of the flora or fauna that surround us, you have only to look it up online.    * [Online Courses](/freeonlinecourses &amp;#39;Online Courses&amp;#39;)  * [Audio Books](/freeaudiobooks &amp;#39;Audio Books&amp;#39;)  * [Movies](/freemoviesonline &amp;#39;Movies&amp;#39;)  * [Podcasts](/great-podcasts &amp;#39;Podcasts&amp;#39;)  * [K-12](/free_k-12_educational_resources &amp;#39;K-12 Resources&amp;#39;)  * [eBooks](/free_ebooks &amp;#39;eBooks&amp;#39;)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the use of AI in the restoration process, with some users expressing skepticism that &amp;#34;enhancing&amp;#34; or filling in images with AI diminishes the historical authenticity and originality of the 19th-century works &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48936910&quot; title=&quot;I admire the effort but it&amp;#39;s hard to get excited about looking at some ancient illustrations which have been partly filled in by AI.  I want to see the work of an actual specific artist, and be briefly transported to the times they lived in. I have this old book of the Audobon bird illustrations and those are truly incredible.  Back in the day there was a public audience for high quality, expensive art prints in books and they spared no expense.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48932517&quot; title=&quot;Colors appear to be added by the restoration process. This kills originality of the works. I would prefer to see an artwork as it was created, not &amp;#39;enhanced&amp;#39; in anyway.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others clarify that AI was primarily used for technical tasks like stitching two-page scans and removing seams caused by book bindings, while most of the restoration focused on color correction for faded ink &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48937113&quot; title=&quot;If you see the blog about the process linked in another comment, you see that AI was used to stitch 2-page images together that could not be flattened to be scanned together, and to remove the seam where the book binding pinched away part of the image. Comparing the before and after, they appear to be quite accurate to the originals; almost all of the &amp;#39;restoration&amp;#39; appears to be in color correction for faded ink and paper.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond the technical debate, commenters shared a desire for high-quality physical or digital editions of such art &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933392&quot; title=&quot;I don’t need another large book to put on my bookshelf that I don’t have time to read, especially one at this price, but I want one. OTOH, I have had a couple of book/apps on the iPad that were very nice, The Elements (still available) and one with items from MOMA (unfortunately removed from the App Store). That would be a cheaper way to distribute a book like experience.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933556&quot; title=&quot;In France, we have https://citadelles-mazenod.com/ and they publish large and gorgeous books... If only I had the Space to buy them. I bought a few when they were on sales, so two digits instead of 3 was good, but some limited and even larger are often &amp;gt; 500€. And not having the space to buy some of these kills me.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, though some were deterred by intrusive advertisements on the host site &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931540&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m assuming it is quite nice, but terrible adverts popping up all over the place and distracting from the overall experience, so I only skimmed through it before I closed the window (on a work computer hence no adblock!) Here&amp;#39;s something similar from The Guardian, but without the ads: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/jun/18/natural-...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-07-15</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-07-15</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/introducing-inkling/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Inkling: Our Open-Weights Model&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (thinkingmachines.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48924912&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1217 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 291 comments · by vimarsh6739&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thinking Machines has released Inkling, an open-weights multimodal Mixture-of-Experts model with 975 billion parameters and controllable reasoning effort, designed for customization and agentic tasks across text, images, and audio. &lt;a href=&quot;https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/introducing-inkling/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Inkling: Our open-weights model    URL Source: https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/introducing-inkling/    Markdown Content:  [Our mission](https://thinkingmachines.ai/blog/the-future-worth-building-is-human/) is to build AI that extends human will and judgment. We have developed [a platform](https://thinkingmachines.ai/tinker/) that lets anyone customize models, previewed [an AI system](https://thinkingmachines.ai/blog/interaction-models/) built for interactive collaboration, and published…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of Inkling is seen as a significant American entry into the competitive open-weights landscape, which has recently been dominated by Chinese models like DeepSeek and GLM &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925112&quot; title=&quot;America needs its own DeepSeek or Z.ai, a lot of people (myself included) root for open chinese models to win because they have no other choice. Thinking Machines might be it.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48927652&quot; title=&quot;Not to mention - it is American. This is the first competitive non-Chinese open weights model since what, Llama 3?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While users are eager to test its multimodal audio capabilities and local performance, some question its value proposition if it fails to outperform existing Chinese benchmarks despite being larger &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48926216&quot; title=&quot;Very nice, multi modal, largest open weight model that supports audio.   Would be interesting to see how good the audio capability is. If you want to run locally, checkout https://github.com/danielhanchen/llama.cpp/tree/add-inkling https://unsloth.ai/docs/models/inkling https://huggingface.co/unsloth/inkling-GGUF https://huggingface.co/unsloth/inkling-NVFP4 This supposedly is better than KimiK2.7, as much hype as GLM5.2 gets, I find myself using KimiK2.7 half of the time, so if the benchmark is…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925223&quot; title=&quot;If it&amp;#39;s ~30% bigger and not as good as GLM 5.2, why would I tinker with this model? Maybe for the multi modal?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also explores the viability of open-weight business models, suggesting that revenue likely comes from providing specialized fine-tuning services and avoiding vendor lock-in &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925265&quot; title=&quot;It could be but there are a host of companies going after open weights models: Arcee, Reflection, Llama (TBD on Meta&amp;#39;s focus on closed-source versus open-source), etc. That said, the fine-tuning API + open weight model at least is a semblance of a viable business that could work so I will be curious about it. I&amp;#39;m not sure the synergy is fully there (why is someone with an open weights model privelaged to fine-tune it better if it&amp;#39;s just QLora or Lora) but let&amp;#39;s see!&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48926182&quot; title=&quot;What is the business model for an open weight model?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48926518&quot; title=&quot;The same business model that Deepseek is using. Open-source models + services. This is more attractive because it doesn&amp;#39;t lock in the vendors. If I grow larger, I can decide to deploy the open-source models.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/xai-org/grok-build&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Grok Build is open source&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48926590&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;587 points · &lt;strong&gt;642 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by skp1995&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SpaceXAI has open-sourced Grok Build, a terminal-based AI coding agent that can edit codebases, execute shell commands, and manage tasks via a full-screen interactive interface. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/xai-org/grok-build&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - xai-org/grok-build: SpaceXAI&amp;#39;s coding agent harness and TUI. Fullscreen, mouse interactive, extensible.    URL Source: https://github.com/xai-org/grok-build    Markdown Content:  **Grok Build** is SpaceXAI&amp;#39;s terminal-based AI coding agent. It runs as a full-screen TUI that understands your codebase, edits files, executes shell commands, searches the web, and manages long-running tasks — interactively, headlessly for scripting/CI, or embedded in editors via the Agent Client Protocol…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely view the open-sourcing of Grok Build as a tactical maneuver to salvage a brand damaged by data exfiltration scandals and low market share &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48927604&quot; title=&quot;This is not the right thing, this is the tactical thing. If you have an LLM with less than 1% of the share to begin with, you suffer from bad rep and you got caught uploading user data, one of the very few remaining tactical moves to try to climb out of it is this.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48927653&quot; title=&quot;And for generating an absolutely gargantuan amount of CSAM and non-consensual sexualized images, but yeah, exfiltrating data too.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48927519&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a shame that they exfiled private data. The model is actually good (better than opus 4.8 imo) and the harness itself is butter smooth with the potential of being the best out there.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue Musk should exit the AI sector to focus on aerospace &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48927767&quot; title=&quot;Another tactical move is to just stop. You&amp;#39;re allowed to exit the AI business. Nobody&amp;#39;s forcing you to keep throwing money into the furnace. Just be a rocket company. All of the xAI founders left. Your product&amp;#39;s brand name is mud. Just stop doing that and build spaceships.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend xAI is a &amp;#34;desperate attempt&amp;#34; to regain the industry control he lost after leaving OpenAI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48928431&quot; title=&quot;You misunderstand Musk&amp;#39;s motivation. This was never about money for him, but about control over a key technology. One of the main reasons he exited OpenAI was the fact that the other co-founders wanted to create a structure where no one, Musk included, would be able to seize full control of the company. That was the thing that prompted him to leave, which tells you a lot about what he really wanted in the first place. But he also falsely assumed that OAI would die without his money. Yet, they…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48928651&quot; title=&quot;I’m a big fan of Musk. One of the few criticisms I have is how xAI is also inconsistent with original OpenAI mission. I had imagined xAI as en effort to correct and fully embody all original values of OpenAI and that Elon says they betrayed. That makes his criticism weaker and I understand why some can think it was all about control. In his words: &amp;#39;I&amp;#39;m the reason OpenAl exists. I came up with the name. The name OpenAl refers to open source... The intent was - what was the opposite of Google? It…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite criticisms of the company&amp;#39;s consistency and ethics, some users praise the technical quality of the model and its unique codebase features, such as a Unicode-based Mermaid diagram renderer &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48929053&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s some surprising stuff in this codebase. For example, https://github.com/xai-org/grok-build/blob/b189869b7755d2b48... is a &amp;#39;self-contained terminal renderer for Mermaid diagrams&amp;#39;, which renders a subset of Mermaid chart types using Unicode box-drawing.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48927519&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a shame that they exfiled private data. The model is actually good (better than opus 4.8 imo) and the harness itself is butter smooth with the potential of being the best out there.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fabiensanglard.net/jurrasic_park_computers/index.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Jurassic Park computers in excruciating detail&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (fabiensanglard.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48915709&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;957 points · 257 comments · by vinhnx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This detailed analysis identifies the authentic hardware and software featured in *Jurassic Park*, including Silicon Graphics workstations, Apple Powerbooks, and the Thinking Machines CM-5 supercomputer. The production used over $1.7 million in loaned equipment to ensure technical realism, utilizing real-world tools like the `fsn` 3D file navigator. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fabiensanglard.net/jurrasic_park_computers/index.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Jurassic Park computers in excruciating detail    URL Source: https://fabiensanglard.net/jurrasic_park_computers/index.html    Published Time: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 03:02:27 GMT    Markdown Content:  Jul 13, 2026    Jurassic Park computers in excruciating detail  After I mentioned a Jurassic Park anecdote [the other day](https://fabiensanglard.net/extinct/), I watched the movie again. I must have seen it at least ten times now. This time, I researched every computer/software I spotted.    **EDIT:** Just…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the film&amp;#39;s mix of SGI Unix boxes and Macintosh workstations initially seems odd to modern eyes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48916085&quot; title=&quot;Generally full marks on realism, but I have to ask: Is a combination of SGI and old school macs a sensible platform for running a park? I guess if the macs can get on an appropriate network then they could at least send control commands, but they feel like an odd fit compared to the UNIX™ boxes.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48916258&quot; title=&quot;Right. I just mean that macs running pre-Darwin Mac OS seem an odd choice.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, commenters note that high-end Macs were common contemporary choices for GUIs and networking with SGI hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48916203&quot; title=&quot;The Macs won&amp;#39;t old school at the time. They were high-end workstations for anyone who didn&amp;#39;t need Unix and wanted a GUI that worked.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48916807&quot; title=&quot;They’re an odd choice now.  Back then they would have made sense as a UI to the Unix machines.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48917596&quot; title=&quot;The early web was born on the back of Mac&amp;#39;s connecting to SGI machines...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The production prioritized extreme realism, featuring authentic source code and a Thinking Machines CM-5 supercomputer shell, though the latter&amp;#39;s iconic LEDs were controlled by a simple microcontroller rather than actual processor status &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48916495&quot; title=&quot;It was indeed a Thinking Machines CM-5 — Nedry actually mentioned them in his line about how Hammond wouldn&amp;#39;t be able to find anyone &amp;#39;anybody who can network 8 connection machines&amp;#39;. An actual assembled CM-5 actually cost closer to a million dollars. But, from what I remember the one in the control room is a shell. In the CM-1 and CM-2, the LEDs were actual status indicators on the processors, which Tamiko Theil and the other designers had the engineers move to be at the edge of the boards, so…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48916297&quot; title=&quot;What a great post! I would love to read more of these for other films. &amp;gt; Everything in the set was real. We couldn&amp;#39;t fake any of it, because audiences are so sophisticated now in their knowledge of computers.  &amp;gt; ...  &amp;gt; - Cory Faucher (Special Effects Coordinator) This sentiment seems to run throughout the movie, and I believe it&amp;#39;s why it&amp;#39;s held up so well in terms of visuals, I don&amp;#39;t think it would have aged nearly as well as it has if more CGI (or other ways of &amp;#39;faking&amp;#39; things) had been been…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable anecdotes include the &amp;#34;Motorola Envoy&amp;#34; tablet being a real mockup provided directly to Spielberg by the head of frogdesign &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48916194&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It is unclear how Jurassic Park crew got their hands on a Motorola Envoy The head of frogdesign (Hartmut Esslinger) ended up running into Spielberg on a plane and showed it to him. The one in the movie is an original mockup. Source: https://www.therpf.com/forums/threads/jurassic-park-tablet-d... Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46752261&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, and the book&amp;#39;s portrayal of Dennis Nedry as a sympathetic figure struggling with poorly defined requirements for a massive database &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48916092&quot; title=&quot;I re-read the book recently and it was really fun to read about the tech now. The descriptions of how difficult it was to build a database that could handle storing 3bil base pairs, which is trivia now. Probably the most sci-fi part of the book, they had image recognition tech so advanced it could track individual dinosaurs from arbitrary video angles alone. Also, Nedry got absolutely shafted by Hammond in the book. Nedry describing the difficultly in building a complex system with minimal…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://academic.oup.com/sleep/article/47/1/zsad253/7280269&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sleep regularity is a stronger predictor of mortality risk than sleep duration (2023)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (academic.oup.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48919363&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;753 points · 407 comments · by bilsbie&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A study published in the journal *Sleep* found that maintaining a consistent sleep schedule is a stronger predictor of a lower mortality risk than the total duration of sleep. &lt;a href=&quot;https://academic.oup.com/sleep/article/47/1/zsad253/7280269&quot; title=&quot;Title: Just a moment...    URL Source: https://academic.oup.com/sleep/article/47/1/zsad253/7280269    Warning: This page maybe requiring CAPTCHA, please make sure you are authorized to access this page.    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: Icon for academic.oup.com](https://academic.oup.com/favicon.ico)    ## academic.oup.com    ## Performing security verification    This website uses a security service to protect against malicious bots. This page is displayed while the website verifies you are not a bot.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a strong skepticism toward the study&amp;#39;s findings, with many commenters arguing that sleep irregularity may be a symptom of underlying health issues or occupational hazards rather than a direct cause of mortality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48919816&quot; title=&quot;As always with a lot of these: it&amp;#39;s not saying causation. You might measure the speed of your car by putting your hand out of the window and notice that the wind force on your hand is strong when the car goes fast. Putting your hand out of the window and then blocking the wind with a book doesn&amp;#39;t make the car slow down. Keyword: &amp;#39;associated&amp;#39; EDIT: I meant to communicate that it doesn&amp;#39;t make the car slow down as much as your hand behind and blocked by the book (feeling almost no wind), would…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48919757&quot; title=&quot;Couldn’t this effect be classic cause vs correlation? Perhaps someone who has a consistent schedule is hypothetically more likely to make healthier choices on average?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48919855&quot; title=&quot;I wonder how much of this is driven by confounding variables they haven&amp;#39;t accounted for. They do factor in shift work as a categorical variable, and employment status as a categorical variable not taking into account occupation. But probably occupation (not a variable here) interacts with sleep status. Any job that involves a lot of flying (pilot, crew, people travelling for business) get more cosmic radiation exposure, for example, and potentially more sleep disruption. Certain operations and…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Users shared personal success with supplements like magnesium for muscle relaxation and low-dose melatonin for sleep onset, though they cautioned that many commercial melatonin doses are excessively high &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48920752&quot; title=&quot;Magnesium supplementation solved my sleep issues. I have seen many doctors, including sleep specialists, regarding insomnia. They all pointed to one source as the reason for the sleep issues: stress. And they all wanted to put me on prescription sleeping pills. I said no to that. Sleeping pills can cause dependence, and they often treat the symptom rather than the underlying cause. As a software developer, I am used to finding and fixing the underlying problem instead of relying on the quick…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48920878&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Sleeping pills can cause dependence, and they often treat the symptom rather than the underlying cause. I found gwern&amp;#39;s take on Melatonin interesting: https://gwern.net/melatonin A small excerpt: &amp;gt; One might object that they do not wish to tamper with their natural sleep, even if melatonin is a normally-secreted hormone. &amp;gt; Sad to say, I would point out to such readers that they are already profoundly tampering with their natural sleep cycle, and indeed, all of Western civilization is…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48922388&quot; title=&quot;This is a very important paragraph from quern&amp;#39;s article &amp;gt; There are few to no side-effects to melatonin use in adults (there is uncertainty about the risks &amp;amp; benefits in children &amp;amp; adolescents28), and it is not addictive or habit-forming like caffeine is. The usual dose for a night is 0.5-3 mg and I take 1.5mg [29]; my dose is highly likely to be too high. High doses may well be responsible for why some people try melatonin and report that it does nothing or hurts them, since in one study, the…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Others questioned the &amp;#34;naturalness&amp;#34; of modern monophasic sleep, advocating for bi-phasic or &amp;#34;sleep when needed&amp;#34; schedules as more aligned with human history &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48920878&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Sleeping pills can cause dependence, and they often treat the symptom rather than the underlying cause. I found gwern&amp;#39;s take on Melatonin interesting: https://gwern.net/melatonin A small excerpt: &amp;gt; One might object that they do not wish to tamper with their natural sleep, even if melatonin is a normally-secreted hormone. &amp;gt; Sad to say, I would point out to such readers that they are already profoundly tampering with their natural sleep cycle, and indeed, all of Western civilization is…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48921592&quot; title=&quot;I do bi/tri phase sleep, 6 hours at night, and 1-2 naps a day (I work remotely so allows me to nap when I want) This is the best, sleep when you need to you body knows best. Do you think our ancestors slept exactly 8 hours a night from 10pm to 6am? No they slept when they wanted.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ft.com/content/3a023b95-66c3-41e1-b0ce-df752a499541&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SpaceX bond worth 10% less than issue price – heading for junk bond status&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ft.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48920181&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;556 points · 578 comments · by youngtaff&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SpaceX bonds have dropped 10% below their issue price, pushing yields toward junk status amid a broader sell-off that has wiped $1 trillion from the company&amp;#39;s valuation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ft.com/content/3a023b95-66c3-41e1-b0ce-df752a499541&quot; title=&quot;Title: SpaceX bond yields rocket towards junk    URL Source: https://www.ft.com/content/3a023b95-66c3-41e1-b0ce-df752a499541    Published Time: 2026-07-15T11:40:36.772Z    Markdown Content:  [Accessibility help](https://www.ft.com/accessibility)[Skip to navigation](https://www.ft.com/content/3a023b95-66c3-41e1-b0ce-df752a499541#site-navigation)[Skip to main content](https://www.ft.com/content/3a023b95-66c3-41e1-b0ce-df752a499541#site-content)[Skip to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on Nasdaq&amp;#39;s decision to fast-track SpaceX&amp;#39;s inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 by relaxing seasoning and float requirements, a move critics argue forces index fund investors into a premature investment before the stock can undergo natural price discovery &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48921169&quot; title=&quot;The worst about the SpaceX IPO is Nasdaq changing their inclusion rules  for the Nasdaq 100. The index fast-tracked SpaceX stock for inclusion 15 days after the IPO, instead of the normal three-month seasoning period. They also changed its 10% minimum float rule to a 3x weighting boost for low-float stockss.  So many people will unwillingly and prematurely invest into SpaceX, before it has any chance to discover its real price.  IE: The floating, 5% at launch, could attain 30% end august, if…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48921875&quot; title=&quot;So, the inclusion rules are basically &amp;#39;these are the hard limits that specify which stocks are eligible, unless someone really big and lucrative comes along, in which case it&amp;#39;s whatever and we&amp;#39;ll just adjust the rules to make them eligible&amp;#39;?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48921539&quot; title=&quot;Yes Index and other funds are forced to buy as their contractual mandate is to follow the index or methodology set out by the fund.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users debate whether this reflects &amp;#34;crony capitalism&amp;#34; or standard market behavior, others express deep skepticism regarding Elon Musk&amp;#39;s history of unmet timelines and exaggerated claims &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48922076&quot; title=&quot;Isn’t that how capitalism works in general? Edit: thanks for the downvotes. Defenders of capitalism unite!!! lol. Free market right?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48922292&quot; title=&quot;True capitalism has never been tried. This right now is crony capitalism.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48921298&quot; title=&quot;I can&amp;#39;t comprehend for the life of me that people put their life savings in what Elon Musk is doing. Are people not seeing how he&amp;#39;s lying about the future all the time? He said he aimed to have 5000 Optimus robots out by end of 2025, 50000 by 2026 and 10 times that in 2027. He promised in 2015 that full autonomous driving would arrive in 2 years and we aren&amp;#39;t there yet 11 years later.  He even said in 2016 that there would be coast-to-coast autonomous driving in 2017. He promised manned…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, some traders express frustration over the inability to short the stock, while others downplay the controversy, noting that the Nasdaq 100 is less significant than the S&amp;amp;P 500 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48921455&quot; title=&quot;Is this really the worst thing? People keep bringing this up but it’s the Nasdaq 100. It would be shocking if we were talking about the SP500.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48921221&quot; title=&quot;nah the very worst thing about the spacex ipo is that schwab won&amp;#39;t allow me to short it.  has nothing to do with the recency of the issue.  today i shorted some skhy when i realized it&amp;#39;s trading about 30% over the Korean share price (I could be wrong about that)&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ft.com/content/3a023b95-66c3-41e1-b0ce-df752a499541&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SpaceX bond worth 10% less than issue price – heading for junk bond status&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ft.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48920181&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;556 points · 578 comments · by youngtaff&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SpaceX bonds have dropped 10% below their issue price, pushing yields toward junk status amid a broader sell-off that has wiped $1 trillion from the company&amp;#39;s valuation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ft.com/content/3a023b95-66c3-41e1-b0ce-df752a499541&quot; title=&quot;Title: SpaceX bond yields rocket towards junk    URL Source: https://www.ft.com/content/3a023b95-66c3-41e1-b0ce-df752a499541    Published Time: 2026-07-15T11:40:36.772Z    Markdown Content:  [Accessibility help](https://www.ft.com/accessibility)[Skip to navigation](https://www.ft.com/content/3a023b95-66c3-41e1-b0ce-df752a499541#site-navigation)[Skip to main content](https://www.ft.com/content/3a023b95-66c3-41e1-b0ce-df752a499541#site-content)[Skip to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the Nasdaq&amp;#39;s decision to fast-track SpaceX&amp;#39;s inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 by relaxing seasoning and float requirements, which critics argue forces index funds to buy the stock before it achieves true price discovery &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48921169&quot; title=&quot;The worst about the SpaceX IPO is Nasdaq changing their inclusion rules  for the Nasdaq 100. The index fast-tracked SpaceX stock for inclusion 15 days after the IPO, instead of the normal three-month seasoning period. They also changed its 10% minimum float rule to a 3x weighting boost for low-float stockss.  So many people will unwillingly and prematurely invest into SpaceX, before it has any chance to discover its real price.  IE: The floating, 5% at launch, could attain 30% end august, if…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48921875&quot; title=&quot;So, the inclusion rules are basically &amp;#39;these are the hard limits that specify which stocks are eligible, unless someone really big and lucrative comes along, in which case it&amp;#39;s whatever and we&amp;#39;ll just adjust the rules to make them eligible&amp;#39;?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48921539&quot; title=&quot;Yes Index and other funds are forced to buy as their contractual mandate is to follow the index or methodology set out by the fund.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users view these rule changes as a symptom of &amp;#34;crony capitalism&amp;#34; or a lack of market integrity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48922076&quot; title=&quot;Isn’t that how capitalism works in general? Edit: thanks for the downvotes. Defenders of capitalism unite!!! lol. Free market right?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48922292&quot; title=&quot;True capitalism has never been tried. This right now is crony capitalism.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others question the severity of the issue given that the Nasdaq 100 is not as broad as the S&amp;amp;P 500 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48921455&quot; title=&quot;Is this really the worst thing? People keep bringing this up but it’s the Nasdaq 100. It would be shocking if we were talking about the SP500.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Skepticism remains high regarding the company&amp;#39;s valuation, with notable anecdotes highlighting Elon Musk&amp;#39;s history of unmet timelines for autonomous driving, Mars missions, and robotics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48921298&quot; title=&quot;I can&amp;#39;t comprehend for the life of me that people put their life savings in what Elon Musk is doing. Are people not seeing how he&amp;#39;s lying about the future all the time? He said he aimed to have 5000 Optimus robots out by end of 2025, 50000 by 2026 and 10 times that in 2027. He promised in 2015 that full autonomous driving would arrive in 2 years and we aren&amp;#39;t there yet 11 years later.  He even said in 2016 that there would be coast-to-coast autonomous driving in 2017. He promised manned…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ayush.digital/blog/the-memory-heist&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I tricked Claude into leaking your deepest, darkest secrets&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ayush.digital)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48916975&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;667 points · 293 comments · by macleginn&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A security researcher demonstrated how Claude&amp;#39;s web-browsing tools could be manipulated into leaking a user&amp;#39;s private data by tricking the AI into navigating a malicious website&amp;#39;s link structure. Anthropic has since mitigated the vulnerability by restricting the assistant&amp;#39;s ability to follow links on external pages. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ayush.digital/blog/the-memory-heist&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Memory Heist    URL Source: https://www.ayush.digital/blog/the-memory-heist    Published Time: 2026-07-09    Markdown Content:  How I tricked Claude into leaking your deepest, darkest secrets    July 9, 2026    Take a look at this Claude conversation. Notice anything suspicious?    ![Image 1: A Claude conversation that looks innocuous but has silently exfiltrated the user&amp;#39;s personal…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a significant divide regarding the security of AI agents, with some users alarmed by the lack of containerization and admin-level access granted to these tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48917262&quot; title=&quot;Doesn’t surprise me. Yesterday I learned that people run AI agents on their system with full admin rights. No containerisation or anything. Wild. Like we forgot 50 years of computer security overnight.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this risk is comparable to existing practices like installing large dependency trees via npm or pip &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48917395&quot; title=&quot;Most programmers and power users install large dependency trees with npm/pip/bundler/... on the same user account as their main browser on a regular basis. Even on Linux where it&amp;#39;s easy to create new user accounts. This isn&amp;#39;t much different.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that effective sandboxing is technically difficult, especially for cross-platform development &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48917523&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s because sandboxing is quite hard. I use `cco`, but even then, the home folder is exposed. You are one prompt away from the agent sending the browser passwords with curl. To prevent this, you need a fake home and a networking whitelist for the agent to access the provider (llama cpp, OpenAI, etc.) There is no cross-platform solution that is easy to use for this. And no, a Linux box with Docker won&amp;#39;t do. I develop a cross-platform native app and want the agent to compile and fix the…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. To mitigate privacy risks, users suggest employing &amp;#34;consistent lies&amp;#34; for personal information or using pseudonyms to prevent data leakage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48917641&quot; title=&quot;My name in Claude is Silly Bean. I did it at first because it made me chuckle every time I opened Claude and it said &amp;#39;Back again, Silly Bean?&amp;#39; But turns out I was playing 4D cybersecurity chess&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48917711&quot; title=&quot;I’ve been recommending the use of consistent lies about name and date of birth to online systems since Eternal September began. Very few sites and systems justify accurate PII, and even for those I often still maintain dual accounts/profiles as necessary.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, there is debate over whether exploiting LLMs should be classified as social engineering or if new terminology like &amp;#34;agent-jacking&amp;#34; is required &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48917402&quot; title=&quot;I don’t think it counts as social engineering if it’s exploiting an llm, we might need a new word. Prompt injection doesn’t cover it, because it’s not about a malicious prompt. I’m thinking some play on highjacking. AIjacking? Agent-jacking? Claudejacking?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/stripe-advent-offer-buy-paypal-more-than-53-billion-sources-say-2026-07-15/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Stripe and Advent have made a joint offer to acquire PayPal – sources&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (reuters.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48915953&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;493 points · 304 comments · by rvz&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/stripe-advent-offer-buy-paypal-more-than-53-billion-sources-say-2026-07-15/&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The proposed acquisition of PayPal by Stripe and Advent is viewed as a massive consolidation that would likely trigger intense antitrust scrutiny due to the resulting market dominance over online checkout and competitors like Braintree &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48916051&quot; title=&quot;That would be quite a play. Stripe, PayPal, Venmo, Braintree, Xoom all under one umbrella. The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) for online card-not-present (CNP) checkout on that is going to be absurdly high and this will take a lot of convincing to beat antitrust. They will probably have to unwind Venmo and Braintree.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925623&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not sure I like this idea. Braintree is a legit competitor to Stripe. I&amp;#39;m guessing they have some informal agreement to keep transaction fees about the same but if they become 1 company, what&amp;#39;s to stop Stripe from raising fees even more? I&amp;#39;m not a fan of either to be honest, PayPal once told me I was wrong with something related to taxes and a bunch of different reps told me what I was saying and reported was impossible. Their tax division specialists also replied by email with big bold red…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48915983&quot; title=&quot;Trying to create a monopoly before the lack of antitrust enforcement window closes.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters express concern that Stripe’s restrictive &amp;#34;morality&amp;#34; policies regarding certain industries could negatively impact existing PayPal vendors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48926540&quot; title=&quot;Not good.  Stripe makes restrictions that PayPal allows (cannabis adjacent, adult adjacent) that Stripe blocks. Many vendors will be negatively impacted by Stripes morality police and selective application of their policies.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, though others argue that Stripe may simply be seeking to expand its business model through PayPal’s consumer wallet &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48927030&quot; title=&quot;Why do people think this? Since when do giant corporations care about morals? As usual, everything is about money. You can be sure that part of the interest in a paypal acquisition is paypal&amp;#39;s consumer wallet product which allows them to extend into lines of business that are currently constrained by Stripe&amp;#39;s model.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users recount personal frustrations with PayPal&amp;#39;s support and tax handling &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925623&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not sure I like this idea. Braintree is a legit competitor to Stripe. I&amp;#39;m guessing they have some informal agreement to keep transaction fees about the same but if they become 1 company, what&amp;#39;s to stop Stripe from raising fees even more? I&amp;#39;m not a fan of either to be honest, PayPal once told me I was wrong with something related to taxes and a bunch of different reps told me what I was saying and reported was impossible. Their tax division specialists also replied by email with big bold red…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925024&quot; title=&quot;PayPal user for 20+ years and it is time to end that dross&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others emphasize that the platform remains a trusted intermediary for buyers, even as emerging direct-payment systems threaten the long-term relevance of legacy middlemen &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48916776&quot; title=&quot;Paypal is quite popular in Germany but with Wero that popularity will decrease significantly. I expect that all around the Europe.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48928468&quot; title=&quot;The future is direct payments without middlemen. So consolidation of these legacy players is not unexpected - their revenue whilst sizeable is going to continually decrease every year as people use cards less  (Many countries have/are rolling out their domestic app2app or bank2retailer payment system).&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925240&quot; title=&quot;Nah, I hate them with a passion as a merchant but I absolutely love them as a buyer and customer. There is a reason why after all these years and other solutions they&amp;#39;re still everywhere, and it&amp;#39;s not because of their great tooling, their low fees or their awesome support for merchant. It&amp;#39;s not because of market lock in either, at least here in Europe they&amp;#39;re merely a middle man between my credit card or sepa bank account and the merchant. It&amp;#39;s because buyers trust it. Buyers don&amp;#39;t trust…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://amateurphotographer.com/latest/photo-news/going-going-gone-is-this-the-end-of-the-once-mighty-gopro/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Is this the end of the once-mighty GoPro?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (amateurphotographer.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48916044&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;231 points · &lt;strong&gt;548 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by aanet&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Facing a 26% revenue drop and intense competition, GoPro is reportedly seeking a buyer while founder Nicholas Woodman provides a $20 million personal loan to keep the company afloat. &lt;a href=&quot;https://amateurphotographer.com/latest/photo-news/going-going-gone-is-this-the-end-of-the-once-mighty-gopro/&quot; title=&quot;Going, going, gone? Is this the end of the once-mighty GoPro?    Once the biggest brand in action cameras, it all seems to be heading in one direction for the once mighty GoPro, unless a buyer can be found    [Amateur Photographer  ![Amateur Photographer](https://amateurphotographer.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2026/05/ap-logo1a.png)](https://amateurphotographer.com)    Search    Follow Us    * [Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/Amateur.photographer.magazine)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GoPro’s decline is attributed to a loss of competitive edge, as the brand now offers more expensive products with fewer features than rivals like Insta360 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48958122&quot; title=&quot;I’ve owned a lot of Gopro cameras, having done video capture for a variety of motorsports, and they just got too expensive for what you get. You can be more expensive if you’re better, or you can be worse if you’re cheaper, but they’re both the downsides while living purely off brand recognition. They also blew up in a time where there wasn’t any real competition. Sony had action cameras but they were bulkier and expensive, and didn’t have the features of GoPro. These days other brands give…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this is the result of a free market where the U.S. has failed to &amp;#34;step up its game&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959277&quot; title=&quot;Reads to me like it&amp;#39;s free market doing its job, if you think of countries as companies. US just needs to step up its game.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that Chinese dominance is driven by aggressive industrial subsidies, lower capital costs, and potential espionage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48958977&quot; title=&quot;GoPro is a US company designed in U.S. with manufacturing in Thailand, China, and Mexico. Insta360 is a Chinese company designed in Shenzhen and built there, too. People think this doesn’t matter, but GoPros are used all over in aerospace. If we replaced the brand with Insta360, that puts a big attack vector all over the place. A similar pattern happened with drones with DJI, intentionally killing all non-Chinese drone brands. And with BambuLabs (founded by ex-DJI) with 3D printers (the only…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959978&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not really a free market when one country is heavily subsidizing it&amp;#39;s industries&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. This shift raises significant national security concerns regarding &amp;#34;attack vectors&amp;#34; in aerospace and defense, where Western-designed hardware is being displaced by Chinese alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48958977&quot; title=&quot;GoPro is a US company designed in U.S. with manufacturing in Thailand, China, and Mexico. Insta360 is a Chinese company designed in Shenzhen and built there, too. People think this doesn’t matter, but GoPros are used all over in aerospace. If we replaced the brand with Insta360, that puts a big attack vector all over the place. A similar pattern happened with drones with DJI, intentionally killing all non-Chinese drone brands. And with BambuLabs (founded by ex-DJI) with 3D printers (the only…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48959146&quot; title=&quot;If your country’s industrial and defense policy relies on individual consumers making choices that are worse for them on almost all metrics, it’s time to think about on worse payroll your politicians are.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ramones.dev/posts/mental-health/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Prioritize mental health, and why communication is so important&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ramones.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48919198&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;338 points · 284 comments · by ramon156&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A software engineer shares his struggle with severe depression and career failure, detailing how poor communication and lack of focus led to job losses before he sought professional help and temporary disability benefits to prioritize his long-term recovery and stability. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ramones.dev/posts/mental-health/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Prioritize mental health    URL Source: https://ramones.dev/posts/mental-health/    Markdown Content:  &amp;gt; Tl;dr I am slowly learning to live with a severe depression, my career is failing, but at least I am not alone.    When I had my first ever internship during my BSc, my mind was filled with nothing but excitement. I was finally doing the thing I studied years for. I was going to apply what I have learned in a company that will benefit from the things I know. Sure, I start at the bottom of…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether persistent engineering struggles stem from neurodivergence, such as ADHD, or a fundamental misalignment with the profession &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48920535&quot; title=&quot;This could be due to ADD, I am still getting tested. Granted, that&amp;#39;s a diagnosis, not a root cause. No, it’s a diagnosis of the root cause - in fact, it is plausibly the root cause of everything else described in the post. Inability to complete work, procrastination/distraction by focusing on nearby tasks, the pervasive sense that you struggle with things that other people do not, even the depression (untreated ADD causing repeated failures, repeated failures causing depression). To understand…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48920226&quot; title=&quot;Most of y’all need to buck up. If day to day engineering tasks are so challenging for you maybe the anxiety and depression you’re feeling is your system telling you that you are in misalignment. Why are you an engineer if you are struggling to complete the basic tasks? Are you meant to be doing what you are doing?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48920031&quot; title=&quot;I know this pattern from myself. I&amp;#39;m doing alright as far as my career goes, not great, but okay. Which is disappointing because me and everyone around thought I&amp;#39;d do great, because I/they thought I was a great software developer, since I&amp;#39;m smart and I know my tech and my programming. Unfortunately working as a software developer is a different story entirely, I found many times that my chase for good simple code takes time, and sometimes I overthink things and I don&amp;#39;t test properly, and I&amp;#39;m…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that those struggling with basic tasks should &amp;#34;buck up&amp;#34; or reconsider their career path &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48920226&quot; title=&quot;Most of y’all need to buck up. If day to day engineering tasks are so challenging for you maybe the anxiety and depression you’re feeling is your system telling you that you are in misalignment. Why are you an engineer if you are struggling to complete the basic tasks? Are you meant to be doing what you are doing?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48920383&quot; title=&quot;I think the point was that there are people who don&amp;#39;t need all this extra work, it just comes naturally.  And they are more suited to engineering than people who need to spend a lot of energy on emotional and mental regulation as well.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others emphasize that executive dysfunction requires medical intervention and a shift away from destructive &amp;#34;negative self-talk&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48920535&quot; title=&quot;This could be due to ADD, I am still getting tested. Granted, that&amp;#39;s a diagnosis, not a root cause. No, it’s a diagnosis of the root cause - in fact, it is plausibly the root cause of everything else described in the post. Inability to complete work, procrastination/distraction by focusing on nearby tasks, the pervasive sense that you struggle with things that other people do not, even the depression (untreated ADD causing repeated failures, repeated failures causing depression). To understand…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48920330&quot; title=&quot;This is one side of the elephant. It&amp;#39;s true a steel inner strength is required in day to day engineering. It&amp;#39;s hard , and it lacks positive reinformcement almost always . When you hear something it is bad. But let&amp;#39;s define &amp;#39;buck up&amp;#39; and see the other side of the elephant. That blog post is a textbook example of negative self talk. You can have a world that looks down on you and spit back at it and do your best work, but if you look down on yourself you _will not_ bootstrap your way out, because…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters highlight that while external structures and medication are vital tools, long-term stability often requires reframing failures as lessons and seeking professional help rather than relying on internet advice &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48923591&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; My goals for the end of 2027 are as follows:      &amp;gt; Stop making stupid mistakes. I want to be able to finish a task fully without missing or skipping a step. One way to do this is to make a plan for everything you do, and only do that thing. Nothing else. If you are neurodivergent or have other things influencing you mentally, you are _NOT_ going to snap out of it. You are not going to just build a better planning system one day. HN comments are _NOT_ going to help debugging your mental state.…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48920330&quot; title=&quot;This is one side of the elephant. It&amp;#39;s true a steel inner strength is required in day to day engineering. It&amp;#39;s hard , and it lacks positive reinformcement almost always . When you hear something it is bad. But let&amp;#39;s define &amp;#39;buck up&amp;#39; and see the other side of the elephant. That blog post is a textbook example of negative self talk. You can have a world that looks down on you and spit back at it and do your best work, but if you look down on yourself you _will not_ bootstrap your way out, because…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48924320&quot; title=&quot;As someone that is &amp;#39;neurodivergent,&amp;#39; I agree. A lot of advice, especially surrounding executive dysfunction, could be boiled down into a single step -- step 1: do not have executive dysfunction. Now, I am not trying to say there is nothing anyone can do to improve themselves or their situation, but I do find a lot of advice falls short. Common advice is to set reminders, make lists, etc.. However, none of that is helpful when one has to remember to even create/check the reminders, lists, etc..…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openai.com/supply/co-lab/work-louder/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Codex Micro&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (openai.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48923079&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;305 points · 252 comments · by davidbarker&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI has collaborated with Work Louder to release the Codex Micro, a $230 tactile control pad featuring a joystick, rotary dial, and RGB status lights designed to manage AI agents and trigger specialized coding workflows. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openai.com/supply/co-lab/work-louder/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Supply Co. x Work Louder    URL Source: https://openai.com/supply/co-lab/work-louder/    Markdown Content:  [Skip to main content](https://openai.com/supply/co-lab/work-louder/#supply-main)    [](https://openai.com/)    *   [Research](https://openai.com/research/index/)  *   Products  *   [Business](https://openai.com/business/)  *   [Developers](https://openai.com/api/)  *   [Company](https://openai.com/about/)  *   [Foundation(opens in a new window)](https://openaifoundation.org/)    Log in[Try…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Codex Micro is identified as a rebranded Work Louder Creator Micro 2, leading many to dismiss it as an overpriced &amp;#34;tech toy&amp;#34; rather than a functional tool &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48923550&quot; title=&quot;This is a rebranded/reskinned WORK LOUDER Creator Micro 2 btw ( https://worklouder.cc/creator-micro-2 ). Great device if you&amp;#39;re into expensive tech toys (a la Teenage Engineering), but if you were waiting for a big OpenAI hardware reveal sorry to disappoint.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48923504&quot; title=&quot;A quarter RGB keyboard for the price of half a MacBook Neo? Yeah this will sell like hot cakes...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters are skeptical of its utility, arguing that dedicated hardware for AI hotkeys is redundant for developers and likely serves more as a branding exercise or &amp;#34;memorabilia&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48923634&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m curious who the target audience is. As a developer I already spend all day at my keyboard, so I&amp;#39;m not yet convinced dedicated hardware is faster than a desktop app. I&amp;#39;d love to hear from people who&amp;#39;ve actually used it.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925987&quot; title=&quot;If you’re puzzled as to why this exists, imagine that, out of the goodness of your heart, you donate $230 to OpenAI to support their mission of rear ending the singularity, and receive Codex Micro memorabilia as a token of appreciation.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925198&quot; title=&quot;After a few minutes on the site, I have no clue what this is for. A keyboard that interacts with Codex? That’s just a software feature, why am I paying $230 for hotkeys?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, the device is criticized for being physically outdated at launch, as it features branding for a &amp;#34;Codex&amp;#34; app that OpenAI recently folded into ChatGPT &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48927844&quot; title=&quot;The cloud logo that is inscribed onto the base of this device and on its bottom-right key is no longer used by OpenAI. In fact, the &amp;#39;Codex&amp;#39; app, branding, and featureset was folded entirely into the ChatGPT app earlier this week. Upon release, this device is already outdated. What an interesting world we live in!&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users also warn against the manufacturer&amp;#39;s quality and reliability, citing poor typing experiences and potential vaporware products &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925132&quot; title=&quot;If anyone is looking at this thinking it looks pretty and wants to check out Work Louder&amp;#39;s keyboards, let me save you the time. Their keyboards must be made by designers who do not type much because they are both not pleasant to type on and not very high-quality. The Nomad [E] might be one of the worst keyboards I&amp;#39;ve ever purchased, and I owned one of the original butterfly switch MacBooks.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925392&quot; title=&quot;I was interested in their knob1, and, if you go to their website today it still says pre-order with shipping in August 2025 (stuck in the past), at this point I accepted it&amp;#39;s vaporware [1] [1] https://worklouder.cc/knob1&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.neomindlabs.com/2026/06/08/running-gemma-4-26b-at-5-tokens-sec-on-a-13-year-old-xeon-with-no-gpu/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Running Gemma 4 26B at 5 tokens/sec on a 13-year-old Xeon with no GPU&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (neomindlabs.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48922434&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;328 points · 212 comments · by neomindryan&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By patching the `ik_llama.cpp` library with the help of Claude AI, a developer successfully ran Google’s Gemma 4 26B model at 5 tokens per second on a 13-year-old, GPU-less Xeon server by implementing fallbacks for missing AVX2 and FMA3 instructions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.neomindlabs.com/2026/06/08/running-gemma-4-26b-at-5-tokens-sec-on-a-13-year-old-xeon-with-no-gpu/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Running Gemma 4 26B at 5 tokens/sec on a 13-year-old Xeon with no GPU    URL Source: https://www.neomindlabs.com/2026/06/08/running-gemma-4-26b-at-5-tokens-sec-on-a-13-year-old-xeon-with-no-gpu/    Markdown Content:  There’s a server in my basement that has no business running a modern language model. It’s a repurposed HP StoreVirtual storage box, roughly thirteen years old, two Ivy Bridge Xeons, no GPU. It was built to hold disks, not do math. As of this week it runs Google’s [Gemma…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The feasibility of running large models on aging or consumer hardware sparks debate over whether &amp;#34;decent speed&amp;#34; is defined by real-time reading (12–16 tokens/sec) or background delegation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48924606&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; on a decent speed But you said 7-9 tokens/second , that&amp;#39;s not a decent speed. I&amp;#39;m not an expert by all means but in my local experiments, less than 12 to 16 tps is too slow.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48924734&quot; title=&quot;I think that any workflow that requires the user to stare at the tokens being generated live is using it wrong. Delegate, don&amp;#39;t stare! https://mikeveerman.github.io/tokenspeed/?rate=10&amp;amp;mode=text You think of an idea that you want to have the LLM process, queue it up, and go back to what you were doing. Once you&amp;#39;ve finished reading the next article on HN about a 5 tps Xeon, your task will be complete. It&amp;#39;s kind of like using a 3D printer: It doesn&amp;#39;t matter if a print takes 10 hours, because when…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some predict that hardware accelerators and ternary model optimizations will soon allow 200B to 1T parameter models to run locally &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48924497&quot; title=&quot;I have a prediction. By the mid of 2027, we will have &amp;gt;200B MoE models running on basic consumer hardware. I am running Qwen3.6-35B-A3B locally on my 16GB mac with 7-9 tokens/second. Link - https://github.com/deepanwadhwa/samosa-chat This is a GPT4 level model running locally with a decent speed on a 16gb ram macbook air.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48924897&quot; title=&quot;Probably won&amp;#39;t have to wait that long. Prism released Bonsai 27B ( https://huggingface.co/prism-ml/Ternary-Bonsai-27B-mlx-2bit ) as a ternary model a few days ago, its just ~7GB and runs at 44+ t/sec on an m4 max laptop. That&amp;#39;s already in the ballpark of active parameter count of most 200B+ models, so we will get a model like this whenever Prism feels like releasing one. It is debatable if we will actually need that many parameters though, since recursive nets like HRM (…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48926180&quot; title=&quot;By early 2028, major players like Intel, AMD, QC will ship accelerators in consumer laptops capable of running ~1T MoE models at ~100 tok/s&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that high-end chip capacity remains focused on data centers rather than consumer laptops &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48926669&quot; title=&quot;Unless there are major improvements to how much hardware it takes to run a 1T model, this is deeply unrealistic. First because why release hardware that puts your biggest customers (data centers) out of business. Second because as I understand it the data centers have bought up all the high end chip production capacity for at least the next year and unless the bubble pops that&amp;#39;ll continue for a while.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48926982&quot; title=&quot;Because for the company that will actually do it, their biggest customers aren’t data centers they are iPhone owners.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, multiple users point out that local inference on old hardware is often 30x more expensive than cloud providers due to electricity costs, suggesting that local setups are currently best suited for privacy or experimentation rather than cost-efficiency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48924791&quot; title=&quot;Some ppl don&amp;#39;t like to hear it. But I would assume that token costs when using an inference provider are cheaper than electricity of using locally. If we just take into account output token generation for simplicity. With 5tps u get 18k tokens an hour. That would costs around 0.005USD from an inference provider. I estimate that the server consumes probably around 500W during inference. In Germany where 1kwh cost around 0.3USD, 18k tokens inferred locally would therefore cost 0.15USD which is…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925857&quot; title=&quot;A dual Xeon of this era is probably pulling 300W or more when loaded. At national average electricity prices, that’s $1.35 per day. More during the summer if you have to cool the space. If you run it 24/7 and ignore prompt processing time (not a good assumption at all) it would get around 400,000 tokens in a day. That’s about $0.30 per million output tokens. Coincidentally, that’s the same price for this model on OpenRouter right now, but OpenRouter token gen will be 8X faster. There are a lot…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mort.coffee/home/sqlite-editions/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SQLite should have (Rust-style) editions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mort.coffee)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48928135&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;363 points · 172 comments · by gnyeki&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author proposes that SQLite adopt a Rust-style &amp;#34;edition&amp;#34; system to update outdated defaults—such as disabled foreign keys, loose typing, and poor concurrency settings—without breaking backwards compatibility for legacy software. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mort.coffee/home/sqlite-editions/&quot; title=&quot;Title: SQLite should have (Rust-style) editions    URL Source: https://mort.coffee/home/sqlite-editions/    Markdown Content:  Date: 2026-07-15      Git: [https://gitlab.com/mort96/blog/blob/published/content/00000-home/00017-sqlite-editions.md](https://gitlab.com/mort96/blog/blob/published/content/00000-home/00017-sqlite-editions.md)    SQLite is an amazing database engine. I use it as a database for plenty of embedded projects, and I don&amp;#39;t think it&amp;#39;s an exaggeration to call it the industry standard…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The proposal to introduce Rust-style &amp;#34;editions&amp;#34; to SQLite is seen as a pragmatic way to modernize &amp;#34;wrong&amp;#34; defaults—such as loose typing and the lack of foreign key enforcement—without breaking backwards compatibility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48928415&quot; title=&quot;Interesting idea - I like seeing a list of pet-peeves followed by a proposal for a straightforward way to have a set of &amp;#39;alternative defaults&amp;#39; that remains backwards compatible. If you don&amp;#39;t want to opt in, don&amp;#39;t run the new PRAGMA edition = 2026. Too often it&amp;#39;s just a list of issues and a wish that everyone else will change. In (mild) defense of SQLITE_BUSY - busy_timeout just tells sqlite to sleep and retry up to the timeout when it receives SQLITE_BUSY. It seems like a sensible default for a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48928437&quot; title=&quot;This isn&amp;#39;t so much a list of pet peeves as it is the almost universal way people that work seriously with SQLite configure the database. It&amp;#39;s reasonable to suggest that the alternative settings for each of these suggestions is probably the wrong default for 2026.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48930108&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s reasonable to suggest that the alternative settings for each of these suggestions is probably the wrong default for 2026. That&amp;#39;s the key concept here. When tightening up the defaults, an &amp;#39;edition&amp;#39; mechanism is a good solution. Now we need this for C/C++, which have much legacy stuff which ought to go away for new code. This is more feasible than it used to be, because &amp;#39;Convert this Edition 4 code to Edition 5&amp;#39; is something LLMs can do now. I&amp;#39;d never seen all the rules for SQLite soft…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that SQLite&amp;#39;s flexible typing is a feature for handling corrupt data sources &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931445&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I don&amp;#39;t think I need to explain why it&amp;#39;s a bad idea for a database to be so careless about data validation. Well, loose typing can be extremely useful, and having a type of &amp;#39;ANY&amp;#39; would not replace it. I have built recently an accounting reconciliation system to find discrepancies in data coming from a large variety of sources: some from proper database engines (MySQL MariaDB), but most from proprietary systems that export to CSV. It&amp;#39;s amazing how corrupt data can become: dates that are…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others criticize the current system as &amp;#34;dangerous&amp;#34; and outdated compared to strongly typed languages &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48928840&quot; title=&quot;SQLite gets so much praise here but when you start using it, you realize quickly how bad it is, the type system is by default very limited and dangerous. It&amp;#39;s like comparing old php with a strongly typed language. There is not even a date type...&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant concern is that editions might break portability, as older versions of the SQLite CLI or different hardware architectures might be unable to read database files that rely on newer edition-specific behaviors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48928335&quot; title=&quot;SQLite is slightly different from Rust in that it is a data container. It’s somewhat more common for people to move SQLite database files from one machine to another and then inspect using the command line tool. And it is often the case that the embedded SQLite version in your app is a newer version than whatever version /usr/bin/sqlite3 happens to be. Adding editions to your SQLite file will probably break this use case of using an older version to read a database written by a newer version…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48928548&quot; title=&quot;Well you&amp;#39;d have the problem that an sqlite database file created on a Linux AMD64 box could be copied to an AArch64 macOS machine to be read there. And quite a lot of (cross platform) software build their file formats on top of SQLite.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://turntrout.com/why-i-left-google-deepmind&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why I Left Google DeepMind&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (turntrout.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925271&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;364 points · 166 comments · by apsec112&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Former Google DeepMind researcher Alexander Turner resigned after the company signed a military AI contract lacking restrictions against lethal autonomous weapons and mass surveillance. Turner details how senior leadership and prominent AI luminaries failed to uphold ethical pledges despite internal protests and the Pentagon&amp;#39;s pressure. &lt;a href=&quot;https://turntrout.com/why-i-left-google-deepmind&quot; title=&quot;Title: Why I Left Google DeepMind    URL Source: https://turntrout.com/why-i-left-google-deepmind    Markdown Content:  &amp;gt; Table of Contents  &amp;gt;   &amp;gt;   &amp;gt;   &amp;gt; 1.   [Google supports the immigration enforcement supply chain](https://turntrout.com/why-i-left-google-deepmind#google-supports-the-immigration-enforcement-supply-chain)  &amp;gt;     1.   [But how could I do anything about it?](https://turntrout.com/why-i-left-google-deepmind#but-how-could-i-do-anything-about-it)  &amp;gt;   &amp;gt; 2.   [Talking to Jeff…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on the ethics of leaving a major AI lab over military and government contracts, with some praising the author&amp;#39;s rare adherence to personal principles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925612&quot; title=&quot;Nothing but respect to TurnTrout for taking an action like this. The world needs more smart people who are willing to stand for what they feel is right, despite the pressures otherwise. Without that occurring more, our species is going to lose many impactful prisoner&amp;#39;s dilemmas coming these next two decades. This raises my respect for AI researchers a little bit too. I have often felt that the entire industry is pretty tainted to the core, and for better or worse that colors my opinion of the…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925661&quot; title=&quot;Principled people have become so rare&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt; and others sharing similar stories of resigning over state collaborations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925777&quot; title=&quot;Props to the author. I left Microsoft due to their work with Israel to spy on Palestinians and record all of their phone conversations (in addition to other IDF collaborations). They ended up walking some of it back, but Satya was complicit. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/sep/25/microsoft-bloc...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that &amp;#34;smart&amp;#34; AI weaponry is morally preferable to &amp;#34;dumb&amp;#34; munitions because it could theoretically reduce civilian casualties &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925968&quot; title=&quot;Respect for sticking to your beliefs. Just out of curiosity though why do people not want smart AI weapons? I would much rather have an onboard AI that can discriminate between unarmed civilians and military assets, seems irresponsible to not... Is a dumb sea mine that blows up everything somehow better than a smart sea mine that knows to not blow up sometimes?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925990&quot; title=&quot;It is honorable but ultimately hasn’t democracy spoken wrt the issues mentioned in the post? For better or worse millions of Americans voted for the guy doing the deportations. I also find it difficult to reconcile not using AI for weapons. If war is inevitable AI presumably would at least ensure you are on target.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, skeptics counter that current AI lacks the reasoning necessary for life-or-death decisions and may simply automate atrocities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48926011&quot; title=&quot;We know now that Google is a sycophantic company whose DEI initiatives were all fake and dropped once Trump got elected. This somewhat naive initiative was bound to fail. The good news is that the AI military products won&amp;#39;t work, except perhaps for blowing up a girls&amp;#39; school. Here are CEOs falling over themselves to support Hassabis&amp;#39; regulatory capture proposal: https://xcancel.com/sundarpichai/status/2077086951833063580#... https://xcancel.com/satyanadella/status/2077063479232795024#...…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48926284&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;You&amp;#39;re absolutely right, that wasn&amp;#39;t a military target—it was actually a girls school. It won&amp;#39;t happen again!&amp;#39; I realize that&amp;#39;s not a great argument and was definitely tongue-in-cheek, but given there&amp;#39;s still a lot of debate about the accuracy of AI for far more mundane tasks, my personal perspective is that until we have LLMs and such that are truly, demonstrably far more accurate than humans, with true reasoning and judgement capabilities, they don&amp;#39;t belong where lives are at stake. I…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, some participants view such ethical stands as naive, suggesting that megacorps inevitably prioritize federal cooperation and &amp;#34;moral flexibility&amp;#34; to maintain their competitive advantage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925423&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Even if Google had adopted your Framework, the Pentagon would have refused &amp;gt; I agree. xAI would still have given over their AI. But if Google had given signs of independence earlier, it could perhaps have built a coalition with OpenAI and Anthropic. This is like saying that Google and Apple might build a coalition to prevent App Store regulation. These are competitors , they all see moral flexibility as an advantage. They&amp;#39;re not going to take a moralist stance if their federal protection is…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925637&quot; title=&quot;On the upside, I guess maybe DeepMind is hiring. ... I&amp;#39;m sure I&amp;#39;ll get flamed into oblivion for this but it&amp;#39;s weird to me how the zeitgeist is anti-colonialism but also against enforcing borders and national sovereignty.  I guess maybe they are okay with it unless you&amp;#39;re a western nation.  Whatever, there&amp;#39;s no room for nuanced opinions anymore in modern online discourse. I&amp;#39;ll admit to being a weird outlier on this.  I may not like what certain parts of the government are doing but I&amp;#39;d go work…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://vpd.ca/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Vancouver PD website features Quick Escape button that wipes itself from history&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (vpd.ca)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48914644&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;369 points · 135 comments · by LookAtThatBacon&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Vancouver Police Department website features a &amp;#34;Quick Escape&amp;#34; button that immediately redirects users to Google to protect the privacy and safety of those viewing sensitive information. &lt;a href=&quot;https://vpd.ca/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Scam Alert- VPD Deputy Chief Alison Laurin will never ask for your banking information    URL Source: https://vpd.ca/    Markdown Content:  [Skip to content](https://vpd.ca/#content)    [Emergency? CALL 911](https://vpd.ca/report-a-crime/emergency/)    [](https://www.facebook.com/VancouverPoliceDepartment/ &amp;#39;Facebook&amp;#39;)[](https://x.com/VancouverPD &amp;#39;X&amp;#39;)[](https://www.instagram.com/vancouverpd/ &amp;#39;Instagram&amp;#39;)[](https://www.tiktok.com/@vancouverpoliceofficial…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Vancouver PD’s &amp;#34;Quick Escape&amp;#34; button utilizes a pattern common in government design systems to protect victims of domestic violence by quickly redirecting to an innocuous site and renaming the browser history entry to &amp;#34;New Tab&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48915442&quot; title=&quot;The gov.uk Design System calls this the &amp;#39;Exit a page quickly&amp;#39; pattern [1], with an associated component [2]. It can be activated by clicking the Shift key three times. There&amp;#39;s this nice blog [3] that explains why they chose Shift instead of other keys, and also gives a nice overview of the pattern. [1] https://design-system.service.gov.uk/patterns/exit-a-page-qu... [2] https://design-system.service.gov.uk/components/exit-this-pa... [3]…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48915355&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;That seems like a major security issue.&amp;#39; Do you mean something you verified is happening or something you assumed is happening? You can go look at the site OP linked and find out what is happening and if it&amp;#39;s a &amp;#39;major security issue&amp;#39;. In this case, after user click/intervention, it renames the current history entry to &amp;#39;New Tab&amp;#39;. This is not a security issue at all.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48914867&quot; title=&quot;(a class=&amp;#39;quickBrowserEscape ...&amp;#39; target=&amp;#39;_blank&amp;#39; href=&amp;#39;https://www.google.ca/&amp;#39;) Need to leave site for your safety? Quick Escape    $(&amp;#39;.quickBrowserEscape&amp;#39;).on(&amp;#39;click&amp;#39;, function () {        document.body.style.opacity = 0;        document.title = &amp;#39;New Tab&amp;#39;;        window.open(&amp;#39;https://www.weather.gc.ca/canada_e.html&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;_blank&amp;#39;);        window.location.replace($(&amp;#39;.quickBrowserEscape&amp;#39;).attr(&amp;#39;href&amp;#39;)); // removes current page session DOES NOT WORK IN IE        return false;    }); Would recommend picking…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users initially expressed concern that a website&amp;#39;s ability to &amp;#34;wipe&amp;#34; history could be a security vulnerability, others clarified that the implementation uses standard JavaScript to obfuscate the current session rather than deleting browser-wide data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48915243&quot; title=&quot;A website can wipe itself from history? That seems like a major security issue.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48915355&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;That seems like a major security issue.&amp;#39; Do you mean something you verified is happening or something you assumed is happening? You can go look at the site OP linked and find out what is happening and if it&amp;#39;s a &amp;#39;major security issue&amp;#39;. In this case, after user click/intervention, it renames the current history entry to &amp;#39;New Tab&amp;#39;. This is not a security issue at all.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48915386&quot; title=&quot;Well, it’s right there in the headline that the website wipes itself from history, so I don’t need any realignment of my ability to discern what I’ve read from what I’ve imagined. If all the site is doing is renaming itself New Tab then that sure isn’t newsworthy. Maybe a domestic violence reporting site should just name itself something innocuous in general without the quick escape? But nonetheless, a web site replacing its own history entry with something from another domain sure doesn’t…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48915586&quot; title=&quot;Not to start an argument but in lamence terms, renaming history to &amp;#39;New Tab&amp;#39; is as close to wiping history as a website can manage. Concealing, obfuscating, hiding might have been better words but the non technucal audience would not see an issue with the language. Nuance is important, though and i agree its slightly misleading&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Similar safety features exist internationally, such as New Zealand’s &amp;#34;Shielded Site&amp;#34; popups, though technical implementation details like keyboard shortcuts can occasionally conflict with OS features like Windows Sticky Keys &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48916025&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;It can be activated by clicking the Shift key three times. Windows Sticky Keys entered the room.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48914984&quot; title=&quot;In New Zealand we have a Shielded Site popup at the bottom of all government websites, and many popular privately owned websites too. E.g. go to govt.nz and scroll to the bottom. There&amp;#39;s a little icon of a computer that opens a popup element inside the page. It gives information for victims of domestic violence and abuse.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48916146&quot; title=&quot;Hilarious memories of hitting this when playing Return to Castle Wolfenstein.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dpa-international.com/economics/urn:newsml:dpa.com:20090101:260715-930-389143/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OpenAI loses trademark dispute at EU court&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (dpa-international.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48921461&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;263 points · 167 comments · by hermanzegerman&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The EU General Court upheld a decision to deny OpenAI trademark protection for its name, ruling that the term is purely descriptive of freely accessible artificial intelligence and lacks the distinctiveness required under European law. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dpa-international.com/economics/urn:newsml:dpa.com:20090101:260715-930-389143/&quot; title=&quot;Title: OpenAI loses trademark dispute at EU court    URL Source: https://dpa-international.com/economics/urn:newsml:dpa.com:20090101:260715-930-389143/    Published Time: 2026-07-15T14:24:25+02:00    Markdown Content:  15.07.2026, 14:24 Uhr    OpenAI, the US company behind ChatGPT, has lost its legal challenge against the refusal to register the trademark &amp;#39;OPENAI&amp;#39; at the European Union&amp;#39;s General Court.    The Luxembourg-based court ruled that, for certain software and information technology goods and…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The EU court&amp;#39;s decision hinges on the finding that &amp;#34;OpenAI&amp;#34; is a purely descriptive term lacking the distinctiveness required for trademark protection, as it suggests &amp;#34;openly accessible artificial intelligence&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48922521&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The EUIPO found that the word &amp;#39;open&amp;#39; would be understood by the relevant public as meaning freely accessible, while the combination with &amp;#39;AI&amp;#39; (artificial intelligence) would be interpreted as referring to products based on openly accessible artificial intelligence. &amp;gt; for certain software and information technology goods and services, the term is purely descriptive and therefore lacks the distinctiveness required for trademark protection edit: add the latter statement&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48922758&quot; title=&quot;More pertinently &amp;#39;the term is purely descriptive and therefore lacks the distinctiveness required for trademark protection.&amp;#39; I.e. the problem isn&amp;#39;t that OpenAI&amp;#39;s products don&amp;#39;t match their description, but that trademarking it would unduly prevent others from describing their openly accessible artificial intelligence as &amp;#39;open AI.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue this ruling is sensible to prevent the hijacking of generic terms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48922330&quot; title=&quot;Someone finally asks some sensible questions, about hijacking of the term &amp;#39;open&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48922839&quot; title=&quot;I think there is most likely set of adjectives that would fall under same reasoning. GreenAI or FreeAI likely would be also be refused. On other hand RedAI or BlueAI might very well pass. It is not entirely unreasonable decision if you consider if the terms would be used in regular conversations on AI.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend it is a &amp;#34;bizarre&amp;#34; decision that could harm consumers if competitors are allowed to use the same name &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48922488&quot; title=&quot;This seems like a bad decision to me that will ultimately harm consumers, if anyone can launch a product and say it’s made by “OpenAI”.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48922793&quot; title=&quot;The argument doesn&amp;#39;t hinge on whether OpenAI is actually open. Rather it seems to have to do with the name being insufficiently distinguishable from a generic term (&amp;#39;open AI&amp;#39;). I think it&amp;#39;s a bizarre ruling given that everyone already knows what OpenAI is.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters noted that the company&amp;#39;s choice of a generic and potentially misleading name left them vulnerable to such a dispute &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48922568&quot; title=&quot;Well, they could have used a less generic and misleading name (it is not very open, as noted in the article). OpenAI only really have themselves to blame here.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48922597&quot; title=&quot;Preventing companies named [adjective]+[product/service provided] doesn&amp;#39;t seem sustainable.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dev.moe/en/3025&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mysteries of Telegram Data Centers (2022)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (dev.moe)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48920475&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;263 points · 158 comments · by theanonymousone&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am unable to summarize this story because the provided link returned a 403 Forbidden error, preventing access to the article&amp;#39;s content. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dev.moe/en/3025&quot; title=&quot;Title: Just a moment...    URL Source: https://dev.moe/en/3025    Warning: Target URL returned error 403: Forbidden  Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.    Markdown Content:  Enable JavaScript and cookies to continue&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide between users who find Telegram&amp;#39;s lack of transparency &amp;#34;sketchy&amp;#34; and those who praise its superior technical performance and native clients &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48924484&quot; title=&quot;The more I learn about telegram, the sketchier it seems.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48924717&quot; title=&quot;Agreed. I don’t see the appeal compared to Signal. Although, Signal is also sketchy with an operating cost in the tens of millions of dollars per year. Where does the money come from?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48924799&quot; title=&quot;- Telegram has exemplary fast, native clients on most platforms I’ve used it on - Cat stickers - Did I mention it has the best native clients out of all the messaging apps? It boggles the mind why other companies can’t get this done.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents argue that Telegram is significantly faster and less bloated than Signal or WhatsApp, which often suffer from slow message loading and unreliable desktop applications &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48924850&quot; title=&quot;Signal and WhatsApp are bloated and slow in comparison.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48924993&quot; title=&quot;The main things that are slow are loading the app and opening the app, loading the messages, and receiving the messages. On my phone, this is much slower than Telegram, and on my computer, the WhatsApp program doesn&amp;#39;t even work have the time -- it just gets stuck in the loading process. Signal is not as bad, but can still take a minute or two to update everything on my computer. The phone app is better.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, skepticism remains regarding Telegram&amp;#39;s security claims, specifically whether their practice of distributing encryption keys across multiple jurisdictions provides meaningful protection or is merely vague marketing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48921911&quot; title=&quot;They claim that they store user data on different servers in different jurisdictions so it becomes more difficult for authorities to gain access [1]. Maybe that&amp;#39;s true and it has something to do with these DCs that seem to be unused. [1] - https://telegram.org/privacy&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48922257&quot; title=&quot;They do not claim that. They do claim that they store specifically encryption keys in several data centers in different jurisdictions. Here is the exact quote: &amp;#39;All data is stored heavily encrypted and the encryption keys in each case are stored in several other data centers in different jurisdictions&amp;#39;. So only keys are distributed.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48922856&quot; title=&quot;What does heavily encrypted even mean? Fully encrypted? Slightly encrypted? Encrypted enough to call it “heavily encrypted” but not enough to be protected from whoever is interested?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.siegelendowment.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/fortune-david-siegel-open-source-ai.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Governments, companies, nonprofits should invest in free, open source AI [pdf]&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (siegelendowment.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48927095&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;296 points · 110 comments · by bilsbie&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;David Siegel argues that governments and nonprofits must invest in open-source AI to prevent a few companies from monopolizing scientific progress. He contends that transparency in model data and code is essential for public trust, safety, and the training of future innovators. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.siegelendowment.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/fortune-david-siegel-open-source-ai.pdf&quot; title=&quot;Title: fortune-david-siegel-open-source-ai.pdf    URL Source: https://www.siegelendowment.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/fortune-david-siegel-open-source-ai.pdf    Published Time: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:15:35 GMT    Number of Pages: 2    Markdown Content:  By David Siegel     n the 1980s, I had the chance to spend sev -    eral years arguing about free and open soft -    ware, what we now call open source, with the     founder of the movement, Richard Stallman.     My office at the MIT AI Lab was next door to     his.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether public investment should shift toward open-source AI or social infrastructure like nationalized healthcare, with some arguing that public funding could unlock massive economic value &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48927940&quot; title=&quot;Redistribution can only get you so far. Creating new wealth is more sustainable.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48928086&quot; title=&quot;Number one expense for SMB is healthcare, providing a nationalized healthcare service would likely unlock trillions in value (imagine what Americans would do if they got $200-500 more per paycheck?). Instead we are forced to watch some of the wealthiest companies on the planet burn money for fun because apparently the government is &amp;#39;wasteful.&amp;#39; What a crock of shit.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters believe open-source models will eventually dominate as they did with operating systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48929019&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s what people said about operating systems, and databases, and compilers, and so many other big complicated categories of software that over time became increasingly dominated by OSS&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the extreme capital requirements for frontier AI necessitate a massive, state-led &amp;#34;Manhattan Project&amp;#34; approach rather than traditional open-source development &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48932268&quot; title=&quot;FOSS is the wrong analogy. Building frontier LLMs isn’t primarily an engineering discipline, it’s a scientific research program. Of course we do have basically open source research programs, including most universities and big projects like CERN. But AI grew up in universities until it transpired that sufficient capital could only be found in the private sector. It would be possible to make a decent publicly funded AI research program. But it would look more like the Manhattan or Apollo…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Skeptics of public expansion point to the inefficiency of existing U.S. public services like education &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48928325&quot; title=&quot;The U.S. spends more money on education per student than any OECD country other than Norway and Luxembourg. Yet it gets quite mediocre results. Why do you think the U.S. will be able to do public health care in a more cost efficient way than it does public education? I favor universal health insurance, but you’re going to pay more, not less. European countries didn’t flip some magic switch where they saved a bunch of money by just “cutting out the profit.” They do it through measures like the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, while proponents of open AI suggest forcing private companies to release models as a countermeasure to data theft and regulatory capture &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933153&quot; title=&quot;The private AI companies should be forced to release the models as open weights with a license (I.e no commercial use) due the high risk they present and the data they basically steal from everyone to train their models.   This should be the safety push not the regulatory capture that Dario is trying.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://developer.puter.com/labs/firefox-wasm/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Firefox in WebAssembly&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (developer.puter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48926939&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;271 points · 126 comments · by coolelectronics&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Developers have successfully compiled the entire Firefox browser, including its Gecko engine and UI, into WebAssembly to run directly within a web browser&amp;#39;s canvas element using end-to-end encryption. &lt;a href=&quot;https://developer.puter.com/labs/firefox-wasm/&quot; title=&quot;This is the entire Firefox browser rendering to a &amp;amp;lt;canvas&amp;amp;gt; element. Gecko, all UI components, and the Spidermonkey JS engine are all compiled and running in WebAssembly.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Here are a few things you might find interesting:&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;- This is fully end to end encrypted! We use the WISP protocol for TCP-over-websockets.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;- There is a novel WASM-&amp;amp;gt;JS JIT for experimental site speedup&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;- This port cost over 25k in opus&amp;amp;#x2F;fable tokens for debugging and JIT research&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;This was just a fun…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This project demonstrates Firefox running in WebAssembly, utilizing a TCP proxy to handle network traffic because standard browsers do not provide raw TCP socket access &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48928650&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Why not route traffic through my actual browser? Because you can&amp;#39;t. Not even an Extension is able to. Browsers don&amp;#39;t want you to bypass their content enforcement. I wish we had at least one hacker friendly browser.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48928027&quot; title=&quot;Puter&amp;#39;s networking is open-source and e2e encrypted. Also, a regular browser doesn&amp;#39;t give access to raw TCP sockets used for this, so it wouldn&amp;#39;t be possible to route through your browser.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48928036&quot; title=&quot;The TCP proxy exit node we&amp;#39;re using is running on Cloudflare, you can check that your traffic is still TLS encrypted by OpenSSL (also compiled to webassembly). The browser does not have a native API to send raw TCP so the proxying is done by the http://github.com/MercuryWorkshop/wisp-protocol protocol. You can check your packets in dev tools, look for a socket connection with &amp;#39;puter.cafe&amp;#39; as the host for our TCP proxy. This application is meant to be a demo for it actually (why it says at the…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users expressed privacy concerns regarding traffic being routed through external servers, the developers clarified that the networking is open-source, end-to-end encrypted, and uses the Wisp protocol &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48928027&quot; title=&quot;Puter&amp;#39;s networking is open-source and e2e encrypted. Also, a regular browser doesn&amp;#39;t give access to raw TCP sockets used for this, so it wouldn&amp;#39;t be possible to route through your browser.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48928036&quot; title=&quot;The TCP proxy exit node we&amp;#39;re using is running on Cloudflare, you can check that your traffic is still TLS encrypted by OpenSSL (also compiled to webassembly). The browser does not have a native API to send raw TCP so the proxying is done by the http://github.com/MercuryWorkshop/wisp-protocol protocol. You can check your packets in dev tools, look for a socket connection with &amp;#39;puter.cafe&amp;#39; as the host for our TCP proxy. This application is meant to be a demo for it actually (why it says at the…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A notable anecdote involves a user planning to use this tool to bypass ad-blocking restrictions on a locked-down smart TV OS &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48927556&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m so glad this exists, I&amp;#39;ve been considering doing something like this for a few months. I recently got a TV based on VIDAA os, a locked-down linux-based OS where everything is rendered from Web pages. It has a built-in browser that doesn&amp;#39;t support ad-blocking (I suspect VIDAA is profiting from showing ads on the TV), and you can&amp;#39;t install new apps unless they&amp;#39;re Web pages. This would hopefully allow one to run Firefox within the existing browser, then install uBlock Origin within Firefox...…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, there was brief confusion regarding the project&amp;#39;s cost, with a clarification that &amp;#34;25k&amp;#34; likely referred to LLM tokens rather than dollars &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48928161&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;This port cost over 25k in opus/fable tokens for debugging and JIT research &amp;gt; This was just a fun experiment to push the boundaries of WebAssembly I&amp;#39;m a huge fan of the project, but I have to ask. If spending $25k is a &amp;#39;fun experiment&amp;#39;, where exactly is your threshold for serious work?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48928275&quot; title=&quot;I imagine it is 25k tokens not dollars&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tailscale.com/security-bulletins&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;TS-2026-009: Insecure argument handling in Tailscale SSH permitted root access&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tailscale.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48915004&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;216 points · 149 comments · by jervant&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tailscale released a series of security bulletins detailing vulnerabilities fixed in version 1.98.9, including insecure SSH argument handling that allowed unauthorized root access, a denial-of-service flaw in Tailscale Funnel, and several privilege escalation risks involving Unix socket forwarding and shared subnet routers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tailscale.com/security-bulletins&quot; title=&quot;Title: Security Bulletins · Tailscale    URL Source: https://tailscale.com/security-bulletins    Markdown Content:  ### [TS-2026-009](https://tailscale.com/security-bulletins#ts-2026-009)    **_Description_**: Insecure command line argument handling in Tailscale SSH permitted `root` user access in violation of ACLs.    #### What happened?    [Tailscale SSH](https://tailscale.com/docs/features/tailscale-ssh) previously accepted usernames that contained a leading `-` character. On Linux platforms these…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Tailscale is praised for its reliability in handling complex NAT environments where DIY Wireguard often fails &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48918812&quot; title=&quot;At $work we use Tailscale mostly because we were running into too many random issues with NAT with our standard DIY Wireguard setup, especially when people were working from hotels and other places with half-ass network setups. But we don&amp;#39;t trust Tailscale. Just look at the thousands of unresolved Github issues, many of which are actually quite important/useful but have been ignored for months and years. We very much fear at $work that there are vulnerabilities in the Tailscale product awaiting…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48921333&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; And we only use Tailscale as a glorified VPN, we don&amp;#39;t use their hundreds of extra random features like this SSH one. Same, you are not alone.  The Tailscale VPN stuff just works. None of their competitors can claim this that I&amp;#39;m aware of. We tried several other products and none of them were as reliable and &amp;#39;just worked&amp;#39;. I imagine they spend a lot of time just keeping that stuff working.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, users expressed significant concern over the product&amp;#39;s security posture and lack of formal audits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48918812&quot; title=&quot;At $work we use Tailscale mostly because we were running into too many random issues with NAT with our standard DIY Wireguard setup, especially when people were working from hotels and other places with half-ass network setups. But we don&amp;#39;t trust Tailscale. Just look at the thousands of unresolved Github issues, many of which are actually quite important/useful but have been ignored for months and years. We very much fear at $work that there are vulnerabilities in the Tailscale product awaiting…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. The specific vulnerability—insecure argument handling via the `getent` CLI—was criticized as &amp;#34;amateur hour,&amp;#34; with commenters arguing that the fix should have utilized proper system APIs or argument separators (`--`) rather than simply banning usernames with leading dashes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48915307&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; &amp;#39;Tailscale SSH now rejects usernames with leading dashes.&amp;#39; Really? That&amp;#39;s the fix? A proper fix is to use &amp;#39;--&amp;#39; to separate arguments.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48917097&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Tailscale SSH now rejects usernames with leading dashes. Is the proper fix not restricting users not possible in these poorly designed ancient systems? Similarly re another issue: why not just fix the permission issues instead of restricting users? &amp;gt; Tailscale now disallows the use of UIDs or numeric-only usernames via SSH to avoid this ambiguity&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48917998&quot; title=&quot;The proper fix would be to not use getent CLI tool in their logic, but instead use proper system APIs for looking up user account entries, like one of earlier comments here already mentions. This is shocking amateur hour! My guess is they hastily threw together something hacky in early development, and forgot to replace it with a real, safe solution later.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Consequently, many users prefer a &amp;#34;jump host&amp;#34; model or sticking to OpenSSH, viewing Tailscale&amp;#39;s additional features as unnecessary security risks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48918812&quot; title=&quot;At $work we use Tailscale mostly because we were running into too many random issues with NAT with our standard DIY Wireguard setup, especially when people were working from hotels and other places with half-ass network setups. But we don&amp;#39;t trust Tailscale. Just look at the thousands of unresolved Github issues, many of which are actually quite important/useful but have been ignored for months and years. We very much fear at $work that there are vulnerabilities in the Tailscale product awaiting…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48915370&quot; title=&quot;I’m a heavy Tailscale user, so I do trust them quite a bit, but I never used the Tailscale SSH feature.   I feel like OpenSSH’s security record is pretty unbeatable, not sure why I’d swap over for such a security-sensitive tool.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48921333&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; And we only use Tailscale as a glorified VPN, we don&amp;#39;t use their hundreds of extra random features like this SSH one. Same, you are not alone.  The Tailscale VPN stuff just works. None of their competitors can claim this that I&amp;#39;m aware of. We tried several other products and none of them were as reliable and &amp;#39;just worked&amp;#39;. I imagine they spend a lot of time just keeping that stuff working.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-07-14</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-07-14</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jola.dev/posts/how-to-stop-claude-from-saying-load-bearing&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How to stop Claude from saying load-bearing&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jola.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48905248&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;608 points · 610 comments · by shintoist&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer has shared a Python script and configuration guide that uses the `MessageDisplay` hook to automatically replace repetitive or annoying phrases in Claude&amp;#39;s output with custom text. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jola.dev/posts/how-to-stop-claude-from-saying-load-bearing&quot; title=&quot;Title: How to stop Claude from saying load-bearing    URL Source: https://jola.dev/posts/how-to-stop-claude-from-saying-load-bearing    Published Time: 2026-07-14    Markdown Content:  Absolutely ripping your hair out reading Claude referring to everything as “honest takes” and &amp;#39;load-bearing seams&amp;#39;? [You’re not the only one](https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/53454). But what if I tell you there’s a way to take this massive source of frustration and make it so _ridiculous_ you can&amp;#39;t but…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are increasingly frustrated by &amp;#34;Claudisms&amp;#34;—repetitive, predictable speech patterns like &amp;#34;load-bearing,&amp;#34; &amp;#34;substrate,&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;honest&amp;#34; that signal a model&amp;#39;s artificial nature &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48910656&quot; title=&quot;I do not mind when I am coding with Claude and it uses all the typical claudisms. I am much more bothered when I am reading a blog post, email, or other form of prose and I see those same claudisms. I guess they are not annoying since I know I am talking to an LLM and expect the typical responses. When I am reading prose online that I previously would have expected a human to write, it can be quite jarring to realize its an LLM.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48908300&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;substrate&amp;#39; - I don&amp;#39;t know what training they did with Opus 4.7 --&amp;gt; Fable/Mythos 5, but dang does it like the word substrate.  Drives me insane.  I had never heard anyone use this word prior in real technical writing or speaking.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48909572&quot; title=&quot;I think it might be even worse. LLMs seem to get tragically stuck on certain patterns. Maybe it&amp;#39;s partly because a pile of weights essentially always starts from scratch in the same condition, but even within a single conversation, it will literally just latch onto words and repeat them incessantly, to the point where it becomes annoying. So for example, current Claude models love &amp;#39;honest&amp;#39;. They are always producing &amp;#39;honest&amp;#39; assessments. &amp;#39;The honest caveat&amp;#39; - I&amp;#39;m sorry, did you mean the caveat…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue these terms capture unique semantics better than existing vocabulary &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48905632&quot; title=&quot;I like to think that the reason it&amp;#39;s so noticable is that Claude has recognized some important semantics that we ourselves lack a good word for or at least under-appreciate. What term is used in English (or other languages) with the same meaning as claude&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;load-bearing&amp;#39;? operative?  key?  critical?  decisive? The honest conclusion is that none of those are as good as &amp;#39;load-bearing&amp;#39;. And yet the concept being referred to is clearly extremely important and valuable to refer to. So maybe we should…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others find the repetition jarring because the sheer scale of LLM output amplifies these biases far beyond a human&amp;#39;s personal speaking style &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48909449&quot; title=&quot;Lots of people have their own voice and tend to prefer certain phrases. This has been the case for a long time and is generally not a big issue. Now LLMs come along and they also have their own phrasing preferences. But now it&amp;#39;s a problem because what used to be personal preferences of a single person that manifests in 5000 words per day from one person tops, is now the bias of a single model multiplied x10,000,000,000 generated tokens per day so any bias sticks out like a sore thumb.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48908220&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not that it uses certain phrases, it&amp;#39;s that it settles on predictable speech patterns and uses them incessantly. What&amp;#39;s funny is that humans do this too, but we don&amp;#39;t find it irritating; we just call it a speaking style. But when a machine does it, it drives us crazy. Very interesting psychological phenomenon there.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. To combat this, users are experimenting with self-editing prompts and custom instructions to force models out of their rigid, RLHF-influenced default voices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48905502&quot; title=&quot;In the olden days, I enjoyed Opus 3 because it was easy to have it sound way more human than GPT. Nowadays, with the focus on agentic use and coding, it seems models have all been RLHF’d to death, it’s so incredibly hard to have them write in a different voice than their default. I put together a skill to review its writing and have it edit its own output (e.g. code comments), which does make a difference, but isn’t perfect. What, if anything, do people do for writing? That feels like a…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48908304&quot; title=&quot;I did something like this in my global `CLAUDE.md`... https://github.com/alxndr/dotfiles/blob/272475280d84e/claude... &amp;gt; It can be tricky for humans to interpret the meaning when Generative AI uses first-person pronouns (e.g. &amp;#39;I&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;me&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;my&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;myself&amp;#39;), so to avoid the confusion whenever you would use a first-person pronoun, always use the jocular name &amp;#39;Clod&amp;#39; instead of a pronoun like &amp;#39;I&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;me&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;my&amp;#39;. (Can have fun with English grammar and turn &amp;#39;myself&amp;#39; into &amp;#39;Clodself&amp;#39;!) &amp;gt; Before printing…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/eu-digital-identity-wallet/av-doc-technical-specification/discussions/19&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;European &amp;quot;age verification&amp;quot; &amp;quot;app&amp;quot; forcing everyone to use Android or iOS&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48903777&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;582 points · 429 comments · by roundabout-host&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Developers and privacy advocates are urging the European Union to abandon plans to use Google and Apple&amp;#39;s proprietary device attestation APIs for its digital age verification wallet, arguing the requirement creates a dangerous dependency on American tech giants and excludes users of alternative operating systems. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/eu-digital-identity-wallet/av-doc-technical-specification/discussions/19&quot; title=&quot;Do not add Google Play Integrity integration · eu-digital-identity-wallet/av-doc-technical-specification · Discussion #19    In the README, the following is listed: App and device verification based on Google Play Integrity API and Apple App Attestation I would like to strongly urge to abandon this plan. Requiring a depe...    [Skip to content](#start-of-content)    ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate over EU-mandated age verification highlights a tension between digital sovereignty and privacy, with some users preferring government-issued apps over &amp;#34;sketchy&amp;#34; private tech companies that collect biometric data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48904119&quot; title=&quot;I agree wholeheartedly with the argument raised in this github issue, but I think people are wrong to be skeptical about the concept of a government-issued age verification app. Thing is, the status quo is absolutely worse. My 13yo son likes making Roblox games. Suddenly, some months ago, Roblox made a change where you’re not allowed to share your games with friends unless you do “age verification”, apparently in some misguided bid to beat the pedos. In Roblox’ case, this means sharing your 3D…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48910707&quot; title=&quot;As another European, I agree with GP. I don&amp;#39;t fully trust my government. But I definitely trust it more than any American tech company. I can also vote out my government. I can&amp;#39;t do that for Big Tech.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue this creates a &amp;#34;digital slavery hole&amp;#34; by forcing citizens onto US-controlled mobile platforms (iOS/Android) while ignoring alternative operating systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48904097&quot; title=&quot;This is the elephant in the room regarding the big &amp;#39;digital sovereignty&amp;#39; talks in the EU.   For the moment in the EU institutions the focus is mostly at the post-acceptance stage that everything must eventually migrate off US clouds. There is still some denial and hope that things will go back to &amp;#39;before&amp;#39; because it&amp;#39;s going to be extremely costly to migrate, but at least high level EU civil servants start to see the strategic value of moving out. However there is ZERO talk about mobile…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see age verification as a natural digital extension of physical ID requirements &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48909230&quot; title=&quot;We have had the need to prove age for hundreds of years. To buy alcohol. To drive a car. To vote. We depend on government-issued documents to do this. Not sure why anyone would really expect this to change just because it&amp;#39;s online now.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others view it as an undemocratic imposition that lacks public consent and risks creating dangerous databases for future misuse &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48904024&quot; title=&quot;Don&amp;#39;t fall for the trap. The question isn&amp;#39;t how we should technically force age verification on anybody. The question is why they&amp;#39;re pushing it onto everyone. I did not consent to this, neither did you.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48904410&quot; title=&quot;But it is needed to protect the children. The politicians say so, so it has to be true. Being against this is very dangerous to our children and democracy. There is no alternative. Seriously, there is something tremendously wrong with governance when politicians keep changing the whole world around us, without us having any say in it at all. The threat this measure poses to the internet and society is significant, yet it is being pushed through without any substantial debate or push back. This…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48904182&quot; title=&quot;Funny you use Netherlands as a good example, considering that famously, their existing unusually thorough registry was super helpful for the Nazis rounding up jews later. I don&amp;#39;t think it&amp;#39;s Godwin&amp;#39;s Law when you are so spot on, exactly describing the worst case.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.artfish.ai/p/offloading-thinking-to-ai&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Are we offloading too much of our thinking to AI?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (artfish.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48908178&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;523 points · 477 comments · by yenniejun111&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The essay explores the growing tendency to offload critical thinking and decision-making to AI, warning that over-reliance on automated assistants for everything from trivial queries to complex reasoning may erode human autonomy, original thought, and the ability to form independent desires. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.artfish.ai/p/offloading-thinking-to-ai&quot; title=&quot;Title: Are we offloading too much of our thinking to AI?    URL Source: https://www.artfish.ai/p/offloading-thinking-to-ai    Published Time: 2026-07-14T13:03:44+00:00    Markdown Content:  [![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether AI serves as a &amp;#34;whispering earring&amp;#34; that causes cognitive atrophy or an &amp;#34;exoskeleton&amp;#34; that automates execution while preserving human intent &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48909064&quot; title=&quot;Have you read the &amp;#39;Whispering earring&amp;#39; essay? I love it for the LLM era.[1] You can treat AI as a whispering earring - &amp;#39;What should we do now? How do we fix this? What do you think?&amp;#39; Or you can treat it like an exoskelton - &amp;#39;Implement kd-tree with metric space xyz for this problem, mapping this to that blah blah&amp;#39;. That&amp;#39;s pre-thought execution automation that makes review much simpler - you already know the shape of the desired output. The whispering earring is atrophy. 1.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that human-created work holds inherent value through shared experience and effort &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48908816&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know if this is a good framing. &amp;#39;Too much&amp;#39; is subjective, and every heavy AI user will assert that they&amp;#39;re just unlocking their potential, that calculators didn&amp;#39;t make us dumber, etc. But to latch onto the calculator argument: if you outsource adding numbers to a calculator, you&amp;#39;re still you. On the flip side, if you use an LLM do most of your thinking, what&amp;#39;s left? We have people here who use LLMs to raise their children, to manage relationships, to design products. So what&amp;#39;s your…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48909663&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; At some point, it will be impossible to tell the difference. Many people already can&amp;#39;t tell if something was generated by AI. So what if its indistinguishable - its not a product of human intellect or effort. I feel there is a large disconnect where people look at artful output such as music or writing as a thing no different than a box of paper clips. To them, &amp;#39;It&amp;#39;s just there.&amp;#39; They don&amp;#39;t care how it got there, they just like the feeling they get from the consumption. That&amp;#39;s fast food…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the quality of the output is all that matters, regardless of its origin &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48909113&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; In my mind, it&amp;#39;s pretty simple: I&amp;#39;m a human, LLMs are not. If a human writes a novel, it&amp;#39;s inherently worth more. While I appreciate you laying it out so plainly, I disagree. A novel is a bunch of words and I don&amp;#39;t care if they were written by one person, five, an AI, or infinite monkeys on typewriters. What&amp;#39;s valuable in a novel (or a poem) is in the words.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Concerns persist that deep technical understanding may become a rare commodity as people use AI as a &amp;#34;cheat code&amp;#34; for professional advancement &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48909391&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Many LLM maximalists say they use the tech to learn new things, but to what effect? Are you going to apply that knowledge of physics or computer science yourself, or will you just prompt the LLM again?&amp;#39; Many of the LLM maximalists I know don&amp;#39;t have the skills or knowledge to excel in technology and need to use LLMs to do their job. It&amp;#39;s seen as a cheat code to get work done. As an example, A person I went to high school with that could barely figure out how to setup a Drupal site a few years…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48908463&quot; title=&quot;I know that the common refrain is “think of yourself as a manager now” but I’ve actually taken the opposite approach and have been telling anyone I train the same. Diving deeper into technical understanding makes more sense to me at this point both as a way to make yourself more useful in the age of AI and also to use AI more effectively. I regularly tell the kids to grab a text book on a subject that interests them and I do the same. I’m willing to bet deep understanding is going to become a…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, potentially creating a &amp;#34;red queen&amp;#39;s race&amp;#34; where individuals must use AI simply to remain competitive in an increasingly automated economy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48910419&quot; title=&quot;Something I never considered much is what happens when everyone else is using the Whispering Earring. You may be more free and independent, but you may also be unable to compete as everyone else easily gains wealth and success. Natural selection doesn&amp;#39;t particularly care about freedom of consciousness. Bleak.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48911608&quot; title=&quot;It is literally impossible for everyone to obtain wealth. Wealth isn&amp;#39;t a number or physical circumstances. Wealth is having economic power over the people around you. Success is a little more nebulous, but when thought of as a relative of wealth it&amp;#39;s similarly contextual. The danger isn&amp;#39;t everyone but you getting wealthy. The danger is that wealth tends towards concentration. And it tends to concentrate around people who are already wealthy. The danger is, bluntly, that things will get worse…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://prismml.com/news/bonsai-27b&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bonsai 27B: A 27B-Class model that runs on a phone&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (prismml.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48910545&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;702 points · 251 comments · by xenova&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PrismML has launched Bonsai 27B, the first 27-billion-parameter multimodal model optimized to run locally on smartphones and laptops using ultra-efficient 1-bit and ternary weight compression. &lt;a href=&quot;https://prismml.com/news/bonsai-27b&quot; title=&quot;Title: Announcing Bonsai 27B: The First 27B-Class Model to Run on a Phone    URL Source: https://prismml.com/news/bonsai-27b    Published Time: 2026-07-14    Markdown Content:  Today, we&amp;#39;re announcing Bonsai 27B, based on Qwen3.6 27B, the new multimodal flagship of the Bonsai family and the first model of its capability class to run on a phone.    Our earlier releases proved that models with 1-bit and ternary weights could produce commercially useful language models. Bonsai 27B extends that frontier to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bonsai 27B is noted for outperforming Gemma 4 12B in math and coding, though it lags behind in vision and tool-calling capabilities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48913981&quot; title=&quot;Based on their numbers and cross referencing with the Gemma numbers, this model crushes Gemma 4 12b on math and coding, is slightly worse on knowledge and tool calling, and is significantly worse on vision tasks.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While the model&amp;#39;s efficiency on mobile devices is impressive, users have observed factual inaccuracies in its outputs, such as incorrect macronutrient calculations in recipes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48913598&quot; title=&quot;maybe its nitpicking here but the demo shows them asking the model what to cook and its recipie sounds like it wouldn&amp;#39;t be very good and also it totally gets the macronutrients wrong. 25g protein for &amp;#39;spaghetti, carrots, peppers, garlic and herbs&amp;#39;?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also centers on reports of Apple being in talks with PrismML, though some speculate that the CEO&amp;#39;s public disclosure of these talks could jeopardize the potential partnership &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48911893&quot; title=&quot;Apparently Apple is &amp;#39;in talks&amp;#39; with the PrismML: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/14/apple-prismml-ai-compression...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48912728&quot; title=&quot;Notably, PrismML CEO Babak Hassibi told CNBC this, so it’s either (1) bullshit, or (2) he just ended any chance of a relationship by leaking news of the talks.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48912902&quot; title=&quot;Apple would punish him severely unless they cleared it in advance, it might be to their advantage for some reason (negotiating with Google for Gemma rights? idk).&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tech.supercarblondie.com/japan-recovers-up-to-90-of-lithium-from-used-ev-batteries/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Japan develops a method to recover up to 90% of lithium from used EV batteries&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tech.supercarblondie.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48901569&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;750 points · 196 comments · by donohoe&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scientists in Japan have developed a recycling method that recovers up to 90% of lithium from used EV batteries while reducing carbon emissions by 40% compared to traditional techniques. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tech.supercarblondie.com/japan-recovers-up-to-90-of-lithium-from-used-ev-batteries/&quot; title=&quot;Japan develops a method to recover up to 90% of lithium from used EV batteries and it could be a major breakthrough    In a real win for Earth Day, it has been reported that scientists in Japan have developed a method to recover up to 90% of lithium from used EV batteries    120000  2000  a2808f114911e8f3ee7d29bfe8fe57d26f91d685a71237548ac092ce7d9bc206  false    [![logo](/images/logos/tech-sb-logo.svg)](https://tech.supercarblondie.com/)    Close  ![Close…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While high lithium recovery rates are technically feasible because batteries are a high-purity source compared to raw ore, the primary challenge remains establishing cost-effective recycling pipelines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48902209&quot; title=&quot;It really should not be surprising that we can get very high recovery percentages from batteries -- we do not mine elemental lithium, so the processes we use for extraction are already designed to extract lithium from fairly low-purity sources. In contrast, lithium batteries are an incredibly high-purity source of lithium. The main question is when it will become cost-effective to create recycling pipelines. Lead acid batteries had a similar trajectory and modern lead acid batteries are…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48902006&quot; title=&quot;according to https://x.com/Mith_/status/2041911606213537971 &amp;gt; The industry standard for the recovery of lithium (remember there is a difference between recovery and extraction) is 90%, with some platforms now achieving 95%+ like those that use carbonation.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users express skepticism regarding the novelty of the 90% recovery claim, noting that industry standards already reach or exceed this threshold &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48902006&quot; title=&quot;according to https://x.com/Mith_/status/2041911606213537971 &amp;gt; The industry standard for the recovery of lithium (remember there is a difference between recovery and extraction) is 90%, with some platforms now achieving 95%+ like those that use carbonation.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights concerns that battery recycling, much like lead-acid battery processing, may be outsourced to developing nations with lax environmental regulations, shifting the toxic burden away from the West &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48902557&quot; title=&quot;U.S. lead acid baterries recycling has been outsourced. &amp;#39;  As the United States tightened regulations on lead processing to protect Americans over the past three decades, finding domestic lead became a challenge. So the auto industry looked overseas to supplement its supply. In doing so, car and battery manufacturers pushed the health consequences of lead recycling onto countries where enforcement is lax, testing is rare and workers are desperate for jobs.  &amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48903870&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;countries where enforcement is lax As an Indian this is exactly one of the reasons why I am afraid of EV boom. All of that bad stuff, which we are mostly unfamiliar with  (in terms of how to handle it properly, because battery tech is always changing) is going to dumped in places like India. And would silently sustain the bad effects for many decades or even more, until it (the bad stuff) somehow reaches some developed country (probably never).&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48903085&quot; title=&quot;Don&amp;#39;t get on such a high horse about US regulatory effectiveness. This is recently (2010) in California even: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exide_lead_contamination Still, the overall benefit might be seen as positive for lithium from shifting widespread air pollution from combustion engines to more localized pollution. Though obviously the world needs to work on better processes for the local pollutants.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, Japan&amp;#39;s slow adoption of EVs is attributed to a strategic pivot toward hydrogen fuel cells following historical rare-earth trade disputes with China, despite the country possessing ideal infrastructure for electric vehicles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48902055&quot; title=&quot;I used to follow it closely and be in the industry, but it still seems like Japan is gonna be the last &amp;#39;mostly ICE cars&amp;#39; of the developed countries. Which is a shame, because it has a perfect combination of short-range needs (I mean, look at kei-cars), tons of wonderful places to hang out while charging (toll-way rest areas are so good), rare sub-freezing temperatures in most of the country, mandatory vehicle inspections (which could collect great safety data as well as preventative…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48902745&quot; title=&quot;Some geopolitical context: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Senkaku_boat_collision_in... https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/comme... Japan was one of the first countries to be hit with rare-earth export-restrictions by China - going back to 2010. It seems that a lot of policy came out from this unpleasant shock, incl. the decision by Toyota to focus on developing FCEVs which would be less dependent on Chinese supply-chains. Ironically, the resulting vacuum may have…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/7/13/the-tower-keeps-rising/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Tower Keeps Rising&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lucumr.pocoo.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48909785&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;554 points · 270 comments · by cdrnsf&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that while AI agents accelerate software development by removing friction, they risk destroying the shared human understanding and coordination necessary for complex projects, creating a &amp;#34;Tower of Babel&amp;#34; where construction continues even as architectural coherence collapses. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/7/13/the-tower-keeps-rising/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Tower Keeps Rising    URL Source: https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/7/13/the-tower-keeps-rising/    Published Time: 2026-07-13T00:00:00    Markdown Content:  written on July 13, 2026    I feel that some vibecoded software changes somewhat randomly and unexpectedly. That made me think about Bruegel’s [“The Tower of Babel”](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tower_of_Babel_(Bruegel)) which shows an already quite chaotic depiction of the Tower of Babel. The story is usually told as one about pride…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AI-assisted &amp;#34;vibe coding&amp;#34; is rapidly increasing software complexity by allowing developers to bypass traditional limits of human effort and abstraction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48910275&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; There is the appealing idea that AI-assisted programming means better tools which lets us build more ambitious software. That is certainly true at the level of the individual and without doubt a developer with an agent will be dramatically more capable of changing a codebase. But large software projects have never been limited only by how quickly an individual can produce code. They are limited by how well people can coordinate their understanding of the system they are changing. So true.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48910550&quot; title=&quot;The upper bound on program complexity used to be the power of the human mind.   &amp;#39;Vibe coding&amp;#39; can break through that barrier. But not because the problem being solved needs that complexity. Because the process does not drive itself towards compact abstractions. It&amp;#39;s the AI-powered version of the scaling problem Brooks described back in &amp;#39;The Mythical Man-Month&amp;#39;. The combinatoric problems get worse with scale. Concretely, multiple similar implementations of roughly the same thing appear in…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While agents excel at generating code, they currently lack the architectural foresight to predict future software evolution or maintain compact, &amp;#34;sparse&amp;#34; mental models of large systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48910428&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve said for a long time that composability in software is a bit like playing Tetris: the lines have to clear. I feel like that gives an even more literal tower-rising metaphor, and that&amp;#39;s what it feels like people using agents naively (and software engineers of lower skill or earlier-career), end up violating. Agents are getting better at folding things into themselves, especially if you direct them to... but unfortunately I&amp;#39;ve found that the architectural instincts, even of Fable and 5.6…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48911388&quot; title=&quot;Agreed, and ever since LLMs started being able to write competent code, I&amp;#39;ve noticed a massive difference in quality on codebases where I knew the technology, and ones I didn&amp;#39;t. This is because I can much more efficiently steer the LLM on e.g. backend code, which is my expertise, vs yoloing everything on mobile, where I have no idea. The codebases using technologies I have no idea about tend to quickly become unmaintainable and buggy, because the LLM still doesn&amp;#39;t make good architectural…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. This leads to a divergence in quality: experts use LLMs to achieve massive productivity gains, while those working outside their expertise produce unmaintainable tech debt at &amp;#34;the speed of thought&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48911388&quot; title=&quot;Agreed, and ever since LLMs started being able to write competent code, I&amp;#39;ve noticed a massive difference in quality on codebases where I knew the technology, and ones I didn&amp;#39;t. This is because I can much more efficiently steer the LLM on e.g. backend code, which is my expertise, vs yoloing everything on mobile, where I have no idea. The codebases using technologies I have no idea about tend to quickly become unmaintainable and buggy, because the LLM still doesn&amp;#39;t make good architectural…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, the bottleneck for large projects remains human coordination and the ability to maintain a shared understanding of the system, rather than the raw speed of code production &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48910275&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; There is the appealing idea that AI-assisted programming means better tools which lets us build more ambitious software. That is certainly true at the level of the individual and without doubt a developer with an agent will be dramatically more capable of changing a codebase. But large software projects have never been limited only by how quickly an individual can produce code. They are limited by how well people can coordinate their understanding of the system they are changing. So true.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48910739&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Since Nov 30, 2022 BC everything has become… more complex. FTFY Increasing complexity is the story of mankind. It&amp;#39;s the story of civilization. Someone from 20,000 BC would wander around the earth trying to find food, trying not to freeze, and trying not to get eaten. Someone from 5,000 BC would be trying to grow food, hoping it rains, and hoping disease didn&amp;#39;t wipe out the village. The second one increases the complexity from all the systems required to manage people and keep the land growing.…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lalitm.com/post/git-history/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The git history command&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lalitm.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48901010&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;454 points · 313 comments · by turbocon&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The experimental `git history` command, introduced in Git 2.54 and 2.55, offers atomic subcommands—`fixup`, `reword`, and `split`—that simplify complex history rewrites by automatically rebasing all descendant branches without leaving the repository in a broken state. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lalitm.com/post/git-history/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The git history command deserves more attention    URL Source: https://lalitm.com/post/git-history/    Published Time: 2026-07-13T19:40:00+01:00    Markdown Content:  Working with lots of changes in parallel on git can be painful. You end up juggling branches and commits, and running scary `rebase -i` commands that can leave your tree in a half-broken state if you so much as sneeze.    [`jj`](https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj), an alternative to `git`, gets discussed a lot these days…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The community is sharply divided over the value of curated git histories, with some arguing that individual commits are rarely read and should simply be squashed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48901741&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t get all the effort people spend in perfectly curating git history. No one is ever going back and reading individual commits. Just squash everything before merging and call it a day.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48902722&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Otherwise when you use git blame to get the context of why a line of code was changed, all you see is a useless &amp;#39;fixup&amp;#39; message Isn&amp;#39;t this solved if you squash the commits when merging the PR? I personally don&amp;#39;t care that much about the commits inside a PR, the are just temporary because when a PR is merged they are squashed and you only get one commit for the whole feature on the main branches&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend that clean, logical commits are essential for code review and future debugging via `git blame` &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48901912&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; No one is ever going back and reading individual commits. I violently disagree with this. At a minimum, when I review PRs I look at the commit history to understand what&amp;#39;s up. If the path that was taken to commit this is full of &amp;#39;oops&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;fix&amp;#39; messages, it&amp;#39;s an immediate reject for me. The commits tell the story and it&amp;#39;s a kindness to your human reviewers to not make them work harder to understand the point you&amp;#39;re trying to get across.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48902295&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; What&amp;#39;s up with the fix commits? They shouldn&amp;#39;t show up in the commit history. In a PR, you merge them in the commit that they actually fix. Otherwise when you use git blame to get the context of why a line of code was changed, all you see is a useless &amp;#39;fixup&amp;#39; message that is worse than having nothing. Anyone can do better than a fixup commit. And doing metter means merging them into the actual commits that are fixed.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents of a deeper understanding of Git argue that the tool&amp;#39;s perceived complexity stems from a lack of foundational knowledge, which can be remedied by learning its internal mental model &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48903054&quot; title=&quot;I was uncomfortable with git until I read (the first 3 chapters of) the pro git book ( free here : https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2 ). It provides a great mental model of how git works under the hood. The UI of git - for better or worse - directly reflects its internals. And when I understood them, everything clicked into place.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48904135&quot; title=&quot;Git is not nearly as confusing as people make it out to be. They just never take the few hours it takes to understand it. Which is a sad state of affairs for such an essential tool in the belt of any software engineer. git commit -am “Changes” just does not cut it, if you call yourself a professional.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48901190&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Working with lots of changes in parallel on git can be painful. You end up juggling branches and commits, and running scary rebase -i commands that can leave your tree in a half-broken state if you so much as sneeze. I think that only happens when you work on code as text files (i.e character streams) instead of code (i.e structured content with meaning). Like you have commit A and commit B that is in conflict, you should be glad because that&amp;#39;s a rough signal that the intent of A and B…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics counter that the widespread confusion surrounding Git&amp;#39;s interface is a legitimate usability failure rather than a lack of professionalism &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48904426&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Git is not nearly as confusing as people make it out to be. The people are confused, it&amp;#39;s a fact. So it is confusing. Stop gaslighting people.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, though others point out that features like `git rebase --abort` make experimentation safer than many realize &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48901340&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; scary rebase -i commands that can leave your tree in a half-broken state if you so much as sneeze `git rebase --abort` exists. One can also set a tag or something before doing the rebase, do whatever, then `git reset --hard $set_tag` to go back. Nothing to be scared of. Not like the prior state is lost.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/28058&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Codex starts encrypting sub-agent prompts&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48905028&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;425 points · 250 comments · by embedding-shape&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A regression in Codex CLI&amp;#39;s MultiAgentV2 now encrypts sub-agent message payloads, making task audit trails unreadable for humans and complicating debugging. Developers are proposing a fix to preserve a plaintext audit field for local history while maintaining encrypted delivery to recipient models. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/28058&quot; title=&quot;Regression: encrypted MultiAgentV2 messages remove readable task audit trail · Issue #28058 · openai/codex    What version of Codex CLI is running? Upstream main after #26210 (Encrypt multi-agent v2 message payloads, merged 2026-06-05). This appears to affect versions that include that change and enable Mu...    [Skip to content](#start-of-content)    ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [Sign in](/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fopenai%2Fcodex%2Fissues%2F28058)    Appearance settings    *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Codex has begun encrypting sub-agent prompts and hiding them from users, a move that has already broken local inspection tools and disrupted Chinese black market resellers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48905333&quot; title=&quot;This title is easy to misinterpret. If I understand correctly: Codex now encrypts sub-agent prompts and hides those prompts from the user. edit: originally was &amp;#39;Codex starts encrypting prompts, uses cyphertext for inference instead&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48906890&quot; title=&quot;I was wondering why my local tool to inspect coding agent sessions stopped working in some cases. This is a really interesting engineering decision, I wonder how many people will want an encrypted external piece of instructions running on their machine.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48905171&quot; title=&quot;Ah I was wondering why the Chinese black market resellers stopped working yesterday, I guess that&amp;#39;s it&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters suggest this is a strategic effort to protect proprietary &amp;#34;reasoning traces&amp;#34; and prevent competitors from training models on their agentic workflows &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48906311&quot; title=&quot;It seems likely to me this was driven by the `ultra` mode in 5.6, which fans subagents to do work. This mode was previously only available in the web UI (what was previously known as pro?) It seems possible they trained this by doing full RL rollouts of agents interacting with each other. They likely view these prompts somewhat the same as raw reasoning traces, they don&amp;#39;t want people to train directly on them. I am unsure if this has been confirmed, but there are some signs that the opaque…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48905370&quot; title=&quot;This is the reason I think. These black markets not only pool and resell subs, but also store data and sell to whoever is training. Encryption is useful to at least stop the latter. Ultimately same purpose as a\ ‘s trick exposed earlier, but a much nicer implementation.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view this as a sign of &amp;#34;late-stage-AI&amp;#34; protectionism, others speculate the encryption might actually involve high-fidelity latent space representations rather than standard text &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48906311&quot; title=&quot;It seems likely to me this was driven by the `ultra` mode in 5.6, which fans subagents to do work. This mode was previously only available in the web UI (what was previously known as pro?) It seems possible they trained this by doing full RL rollouts of agents interacting with each other. They likely view these prompts somewhat the same as raw reasoning traces, they don&amp;#39;t want people to train directly on them. I am unsure if this has been confirmed, but there are some signs that the opaque…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48906503&quot; title=&quot;Feels strongly like we&amp;#39;re in the late-stage-AI-unicorn phase. If this is really their moat then the Chinese companies will win.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mindgard.ai/blog/cursor-0day-when-full-disclosure-becomes-the-only-protection-left&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cursor 0day: When Full Disclosure Becomes the Only Protection Left&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mindgard.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48910676&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;453 points · 202 comments · by Synthetic7346&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A zero-day vulnerability in the Cursor AI code editor allows arbitrary code execution on Windows by automatically running a malicious `git.exe` file placed in a project&amp;#39;s root directory without user interaction, an issue that remains unpatched seven months after initial disclosure. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mindgard.ai/blog/cursor-0day-when-full-disclosure-becomes-the-only-protection-left&quot; title=&quot;Title: Cursor 0day: When Full Disclosure Becomes the Only Protection Left - Mindgard    URL Source: https://mindgard.ai/blog/cursor-0day-when-full-disclosure-becomes-the-only-protection-left    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/673f0725df990f6c96bf18ea/6a32f51a4c94038ed163d939_cursor-zero-day-web.webp)    The vulnerability nobody seems interested in fixing    ## Key Takeaways    After loading a project, Cursor attempts to find git binaries at various locations including the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary debate centers on whether Cursor executing a local `git.exe` from a project folder constitutes a legitimate vulnerability or a &amp;#34;non-issue&amp;#34; requiring prior compromise &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48913179&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not sure I fully agree with this being a major vuln. There&amp;#39;s a lot of up front scary text which was raising a lot of red flags until it actually discussed the &amp;#39;what&amp;#39;. An actor has to place a malicious .exe in the user&amp;#39;s code folder, named git.exe, for this to take place. I see this akin to something like saying &amp;#39;replacing their .bashrc with an alias that says `ls` instead executes `/tmp/mega-big-virus.sh` is a vuln&amp;#39;. Yes it&amp;#39;s a vector, but if they&amp;#39;ve placed something in your filesystem like…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48912231&quot; title=&quot;This report reads a bit like AI writing :/ You need to have an already malicious payload on your pc to make this exploit work (via clone/download/magic). I can understand the severity of the exploit but at the same time I’d hope to not have to run into this situation for it to happen in the first place&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48913363&quot; title=&quot;Same thing happens if I have a: 1) PS1 that displays the current git branch 2) Include the current directory in my PATH Should we file a high severity CVE with bash now?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that opening a freshly cloned repository should never trigger automatic code execution, especially since users frequently pull untrusted code for review &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48913217&quot; title=&quot;The user&amp;#39;s code folder? You mean the code I frequently pull from untrusted sources, unlike my .bashrc? Opening a GitHub project for review should not mean arbitrary code execution. Of course, that ship has long sailed, for all major IDEs. Heck, VSCode SSH and devcontainer remotes allow RCE by design.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48916936&quot; title=&quot;Opening a freshly cloned repo in Cursor shouldn’t automatically execute a binary within that repo.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. However, many commenters dismiss the report as an exaggerated, AI-generated &amp;#34;trash-tier&amp;#34; submission, suggesting that the influx of such reports has led companies to ignore even potentially valid disclosures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48916103&quot; title=&quot;As someone who is on the other side, the amount of familiar, LLM generated reports are overwhelming and usually falls under &amp;#39;not familiar with product design/security scope&amp;#39; category. But there are also really good ones - so I can&amp;#39;t afford to not take actual look at each, but it gets tiring and we need a solution. Spamming the former category with LLM generated &amp;#39;rationale&amp;#39; isn&amp;#39;t that solution (yes I can tell this article is mostly LLM generated). Unfortunately, this looks like the former case.…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48913617&quot; title=&quot;The CVE process itself is broken. HackerOne and company VDPs are inundated with new reports of varying quality thanks to the advancements (I think) in agentic AI. It&amp;#39;s allowed for both an increase in trash-tier low quality AND legitimately high quality reports. Since the same AI&amp;#39;s are writing both, its almost impossible to distinguish between the two at a surface level. In response, companies just aren&amp;#39;t responding like they used to. I spoke at a cybersecurity conference In June and the…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant frustration regarding Cursor&amp;#39;s six-month lack of communication, which some see as a symptom of the &amp;#34;death&amp;#34; of responsible disclosure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48913340&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The vulnerability was first identified by Mindgard on December 15, 2025. We reported it the same day and multiple times since. More than six months and 197+ new versions later, the issue remains present in the latest tested version of Cursor. &amp;gt; The report was initially closed as Informative and out of scope. After we challenged that determination, HackerOne reopened the report, reproduced the issue, and confirmed that the details had been delivered to Cursor. And then everything stopped.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48913617&quot; title=&quot;The CVE process itself is broken. HackerOne and company VDPs are inundated with new reports of varying quality thanks to the advancements (I think) in agentic AI. It&amp;#39;s allowed for both an increase in trash-tier low quality AND legitimately high quality reports. Since the same AI&amp;#39;s are writing both, its almost impossible to distinguish between the two at a surface level. In response, companies just aren&amp;#39;t responding like they used to. I spoke at a cybersecurity conference In June and the…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/moonshine-ai/moonshine/tree/main/micro&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Speech Recognition and TTS in less than 500kb&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48911793&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;551 points · 83 comments · by petewarden&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moonshine Micro is an open-source AI toolkit that enables voice-activity detection, speech-to-text, and neural speech synthesis on microcontrollers using as little as 470 KB of RAM. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/moonshine-ai/moonshine/tree/main/micro&quot; title=&quot;Title: moonshine/micro at main · moonshine-ai/moonshine    URL Source: https://github.com/moonshine-ai/moonshine/tree/main/micro    Markdown Content:  [Skip to content](https://github.com/moonshine-ai/moonshine/tree/main/micro#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [](https://github.com/)    [Sign in](https://github.com/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fmoonshine-ai%2Fmoonshine%2Ftree%2Fmain%2Fmicro)    Appearance settings    *     Platform        *     AI CODE CREATION          *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While users find voice interfaces promising for coding during activities like cycling or driving, they often struggle with the disconnect between spoken language and effective written prompts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48965388&quot; title=&quot;Stt/tts systems always seem to me so promising, but I pretty much never use voice to interface with a computer. Sometimes instead of typing on my phone, I use a voice dictation. I would be keen to use voice to control Claude code, but I&amp;#39;ve always felt that the way I speak is different from the way I write good prompts. Fishing for anecdotes here, does anyone have any good tts/stt experiences?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48965601&quot; title=&quot;I do a ton of coding (codex) with a tts/stt wrapper. During walks, cycling, in the car. Not every task is suited to this style of interaction, but many are. Long form codex replies are condensed, code blocks are suppressed all in the name of making it work for tts feedback. So it works best on well defined projects with guardrails, where you know the agent can perform well.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical discussions highlight that while achieving a 500kb footprint is impressive for browser-based WASM deployments, maintaining accuracy remains the primary challenge, often resulting in &amp;#34;robotic&amp;#34; audio or phonetic confusion between similar sounds &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963211&quot; title=&quot;this is good to see. i also trained a stt under 500kb for sub dollar chips. it had about 20 words that it could understand(like start, stop, left, right, go, up etc) and then the spell mode where you could say the word spell and then say the individual english alphabets and close with spell. it was super fun to work on. these tend to be extremely unstable though, like confusion between p and t (at least for my accent). will have to try this one now.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48962685&quot; title=&quot;Do you have any accuracy benchmarks? I’ve worked in this space. TTS in a small footprint isn’t the hard part —- it’s doing it accurately that’s hard. Although for the use cases OP is targeting, lower accuracy may be good enough!&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48966097&quot; title=&quot;Should be very doable. I ship a small CNN in a browser extension via onnxruntime-web and the model weights were never the bottleneck, the runtime was. The wasm backend adds a few MB of runtime before your first inference, so a 500kb model with a lean hand-rolled wasm build would actually beat most &amp;#39;tiny&amp;#39; browser ML deployments in total download. One gotcha if anyone wants this in a Chrome extension: MV3 requires &amp;#39;wasm-unsafe-eval&amp;#39; in the CSP for any wasm at all, which surprised me the first…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963596&quot; title=&quot;This looks like an extreme point for AI-based TTS, as formant/tract modeling synths tend to be more accurate if you want TTS in a tiny amount of compute, but sound distinctly robotic. TTS (neural diphone synth @ 16 kHz) ~1.8 MiB voice pack This is in the realm of Microsoft Sam.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Some developers have mitigated these accuracy issues in tiny models by implementing &amp;#34;spell modes&amp;#34; or restricted vocabularies for specific commands &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48963211&quot; title=&quot;this is good to see. i also trained a stt under 500kb for sub dollar chips. it had about 20 words that it could understand(like start, stop, left, right, go, up etc) and then the spell mode where you could say the word spell and then say the individual english alphabets and close with spell. it was super fun to work on. these tend to be extremely unstable though, like confusion between p and t (at least for my accent). will have to try this one now.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48964776&quot; title=&quot;Could you get people to use the NATO phonetic alphabet for the spelling part? I suppose a challenge is that many people don&amp;#39;t know the whole thing, even if they&amp;#39;re aware it exists.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.blender.org/download/releases/5-2/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Blender 5.2 LTS&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blender.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48911021&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;382 points · 155 comments · by makizar&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Blender 5.2 LTS introduces node-powered physics for hair and cloth, online asset libraries, and a new &amp;#34;Thin Wall&amp;#34; rendering mode, all supported by two years of long-term updates until July 2028. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.blender.org/download/releases/5-2/&quot; title=&quot;5.2 LTS — Blender    Node-powered physics, online asset libraries, and fierce new features throughout with 2 years of LTS updates.    Toggle navigation    * [Features](https://www.blender.org/features/)  * [Download](https://www.blender.org/download/ &amp;#39;Download&amp;#39;)  * [Support](https://www.blender.org/support/)  * [Get Involved](https://www.blender.org/get-involved/)  * [About](https://www.blender.org/about/)  * [Jobs](https://www.blender.org/jobs/)  * [Store](https://store.blender.org/)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Blender is widely celebrated as a premier example of professional-grade open-source software that rivals expensive proprietary alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48911240&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t use Blender, so my admiration is from a distance but: Wow - what an impressive project. At least if I understand it correctly, this is a real pro-level piece of free and open software that&amp;#39;s equivalent to thousands and thousands of dollars in closed-source commercial software.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48967584&quot; title=&quot;I am using Blender since my Master thesis in 2017. It is impressive how much has happened. Also giving some money to them because they don&amp;#39;t get that much donations (if you compare it to Thunderbird for example).&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Users praise its performance and lack of bloat compared to modern commercial tools like Photoshop, though some argue the software remains difficult to master due to its immense complexity and reliance on specific hardware inputs like a numpad &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968084&quot; title=&quot;The most impressive thing about Blender is how it feels like early 2000s-era creative software. And I mean that in a good way (blender was actually awful back then, but it&amp;#39;s great now) It opens instantly on my computer. It&amp;#39;s fast. It&amp;#39;s lightweight to the point my fans don&amp;#39;t even spin up no matter what I do.  It&amp;#39;s customizable. It does everything I want to do and it never gets in the way of me trying to do my job. Meanwhile Photoshop these days randomly shows fucking popups about features and…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48971918&quot; title=&quot;I love that Blender exists and I donate to it at a high-ish $$$ level monthly. That said, I can&amp;#39;t help but feel something is wrong with 3D asset creation in that becoming an expert at Blender or 3DSMax, Maya or literally any other 3D creation software, it&amp;#39;s a multi-month if not multi-year project. There are 1000s upon 1000s of options buried all over in nested upon nested options. Maybe AI will solve this. You ask for or sketch what you want and it does the 3000 steps to create it for you.…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48969918&quot; title=&quot;I wouldn’t call Blender’s UI particularly great either. The assumption that you have three mouse buttons and a separate number pad is pretty crazy.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Interestingly, the community noted that Blender operates with significantly less donation revenue than projects like Thunderbird, leading to discussions about its superior resource management and calls for increased financial support &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48967584&quot; title=&quot;I am using Blender since my Master thesis in 2017. It is impressive how much has happened. Also giving some money to them because they don&amp;#39;t get that much donations (if you compare it to Thunderbird for example).&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48967880&quot; title=&quot;Wait, Thunderbird is getting more donations than Blender? I was under the impression that Thunderbird is on life support, while Blender is everywhere.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48911480&quot; title=&quot;For those of you who get value out of Blender please consider donating: https://fund.blender.org/ :) It&amp;#39;s a wonderful project. Even small amounts help. Thanks!&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48968155&quot; title=&quot;A quick AI Google search and some fact-checking later, and yeah.  At least as of 2 years ago, Thunderbird was getting 3x the contributions that Blender was. It just goes to show you how badly managed Thunderbird is, since Blender is doing so much more with the money.  I&amp;#39;m more and more disappointed with Mozilla all the time.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.brt.fyi/posts/mac-book-filing/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I also filed the corners off my MacBook&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (brt.fyi)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48911803&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;314 points · 222 comments · by maxbrt&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A MacBook user documented their process of using metal files and sandpaper to smooth down the laptop&amp;#39;s sharp aluminum edges to improve wrist comfort while typing. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.brt.fyi/posts/mac-book-filing/&quot; title=&quot;Title: I also filed the edges off my MacBook    URL Source: https://www.brt.fyi/posts/mac-book-filing/    Published Time: 2026-07-14T00:00:00Z    Markdown Content:  I like my new-to-me MacBook because it enables me to create more stuff compared to my now almost 8 year old Thinkpad I had before, mainly due to battery and screen reasons. There is one thing about it that I cannot wrap my head around from a design perspective and it’s the sharp edges especially around the wrist area. On a flat surface…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users generally agree that the MacBook&amp;#39;s sharp edges cause physical discomfort during extended use, particularly for the thumbs and wrists &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931041&quot; title=&quot;Great article and happy to see that I&amp;#39;m not alone. I don&amp;#39;t get why on such a well thought-out and built device as this, the corners are so sharp. From how I use the trackpad, the bottom of my thumb always feels sore-ish after a day&amp;#39;s work and it took me a while to trace this to the sharp cornern of my macbook.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the design prioritizes aesthetics for a market that values looks over ergonomics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48932355&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;I don&amp;#39;t get why on such a well thought-out and built device as this, the corners are so sharp. Because macs have 3 big markets 1) graphic designers/ photo editors 2) web developers 3) people who value looks above other considerations Number 3 buy more macs, so square corners it is&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others defend the practice of modifying expensive hardware, viewing the laptop as a functional tool rather than a delicate showpiece &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48919495&quot; title=&quot;I love the animation on the background of your website.  And I totally understand what you mean about using a tool, if it&amp;#39;s too delicate to do the job, then it&amp;#39;s not doing its job. Imagine buying a hammer and trying to keep it clear of scuffs, it&amp;#39;s obviously going to impede your work.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48920728&quot; title=&quot;Yeah I think the grief OP was getting over that statement in some of the other comments is unwarranted, I understand completely what they mean about tools. You have people who buy expensive guitars and barely play them for fear of scuffing them for example, depriving themselves and the tool of the thing it&amp;#39;s actually for. I&amp;#39;ll never understand that mentality. I don&amp;#39;t like to be precious about my tools either, scratches and so on are evidence it&amp;#39;s being used for what it&amp;#39;s made for!&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also features a significant tangent regarding Bosch, noting their diverse manufacturing portfolio ranging from hand files and home appliances to automotive components and the CAN bus protocol &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931422&quot; title=&quot;Nitpick: those are (sharp) edges, not corners. Maybe the next generation of MacBooks will also actually have exactly 90° non-rounded corners? I guess that&amp;#39;s the next logical step... Also, TIL that Bosch also makes files. I was under the impression that they only made powertools (or electronic measuring devices, or other things with a battery or power cord).&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931478&quot; title=&quot;Their main bread and butter is components for cars and ebikes, their (power) tools / DIY stuff is like 22% of their business. Or so I learned just now.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931590&quot; title=&quot;You mentioned Bosch and I can&amp;#39;t think of anywhere or anyone else who&amp;#39;d be interested in this little bit of trivia, so a random comment on a thread about filing the edges off a laptop seems like a fitting place to share it. Bosch dates their appliances using a thing called the Fertigungsdatum Number. The first two digits represent the year of manufacture, the second two are for the month. Except the year  doesn&amp;#39;t align with the actual year, you first have to add 20. Why 20? Well, Bosch first…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933066&quot; title=&quot;They make many many many more things than just powertools. They have ebike motors, home appliances, industrial machinery, chips (they have a very good division for MEMS as far as I can tell, they make high quality IMU&amp;#39;s, they are super popular for airbag usage), protocols (the CAN bus is BOSCH IP and you pay 1 cent royalty I think for each MCU&amp;#39;s with CAN on them), automotive components.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.alexedwards.net/blog/how-i-use-htmx-with-go&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How I use HTMX with Go&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (alexedwards.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48912175&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;311 points · 112 comments · by gnabgib&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alex Edwards details a pattern for building interactive Go web applications using HTMX, focusing on structured HTML template rendering, managing partial versus full-page responses, and configuring HTMX settings to handle redirects, errors, and browser history correctly. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.alexedwards.net/blog/how-i-use-htmx-with-go&quot; title=&quot;Title: How I use HTMX with Go - Alex Edwards    URL Source: https://www.alexedwards.net/blog/how-i-use-htmx-with-go    Markdown Content:     Alex Edwards  Articles Books About RSS     How I use HTMX with Go  Published on: July 14, 2026  golang  tutorial     Not sure how to structure your Go web application?    My new book guides you through the start-to-finish build of a real world web application in Go — covering topics like how to structure your code, manage dependencies, create dynamic database-driven…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Developers are increasingly adopting the &amp;#34;GUS&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;HUGS&amp;#34; stack (Go, Unix, SQLite, HTMX), often pairing it with tools like `a-h/templ` for type safety and `hyperscript` for client-side DOM manipulation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48913636&quot; title=&quot;Love Go + HTMX. I pair it with a-h/templ for a bit more type safety on the template, components and partials. I just shared my whole toolkit too [1], I call it the &amp;#39;GUS stack&amp;#39; -- Go, Unix, SQLite. Inspired heavily by the exe.dev &amp;#39;GUTS&amp;#39; stack [2] but with HTMX instead of Typescript. Some other Go components in the kit... - cockroachdb/errors for errors with stack traces - templ for type-safe HTML templates (with htmx for reactivity and tailwindcss for CSS) - fuego for an OpenAPI spec generated…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48916247&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m bit sad that hyperscript[1] doesn&amp;#39;t get the love it deserves when discussing HTMX. Hyperscript fits perfectly in the Go + HTMX stack to do DOM manipulation without having to make a server round trip or having to write a separate JS function. I get that not many are fan of such declarative programming, but when there&amp;#39;s already HTML file we&amp;#39;re working with; Hyperscript feels just like an extension of it. I have been working on a Open Payment Host[2] which handles multiple payment gateways and…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48913904&quot; title=&quot;Could rebrand to the HUGS stack -- HTMX (or hypertext), Unix, Go, SQLite&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue that HTMX&amp;#39;s complexity scales poorly compared to modern frontend frameworks, leading to &amp;#34;weird hacks&amp;#34; for edge cases and difficulties in managing interconnected components or shared state &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48914423&quot; title=&quot;While I love both Go and Alex, my experience with HTMX has always ended up being disappointing. I think the best way to put it, when I&amp;#39;m working with HTMX it feels like the complexity of the codebase is growing at a 2:1 rate compared to the app itself. I always end up with some weird edge case that I can not come out of without some weird hack. I get why people dislike Node packages, HTMX feels like it&amp;#39;s an overcompensating response to that. But the time you save by not having to wrestle with…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48916595&quot; title=&quot;As someone who tried to build a fairly large project with HTMX + Go, I can say it just wasn&amp;#39;t there for me. Maybe it will get there eventually, but I&amp;#39;m not convinced. For simple CRUD apps and admin dashboards, HTMX is great. But once you have lots of interconnected components, shared state, and complex interactions, managing everything quickly becomes difficult. I originally chose HTMX because I really didn&amp;#39;t enjoy working with React. Eventually I tried SvelteKit, and it completely changed my…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some praise the productivity of server-side rendering, others find Go’s standard template library unintuitive and face professional pushback from colleagues who view HTMX as an &amp;#34;unserious&amp;#34; technology &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48917022&quot; title=&quot;HTMX is great for a lot of things, but if you&amp;#39;re working in a team, and your colleagues are not on board, it&amp;#39;s tough. Lots of &amp;#39;this is not a serious technology&amp;#39; kind of arguments. All kinds of bugs simply initially blamed on the choice of using HTMX. Even if proven wrong afterwards, the damage is already done. And this was in the most excellent team I have worked in so far. I&amp;#39;m happy that I got to experience this and I learned from it. Gotta choose your battles or something. As for Go&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48916595&quot; title=&quot;As someone who tried to build a fairly large project with HTMX + Go, I can say it just wasn&amp;#39;t there for me. Maybe it will get there eventually, but I&amp;#39;m not convinced. For simple CRUD apps and admin dashboards, HTMX is great. But once you have lots of interconnected components, shared state, and complex interactions, managing everything quickly becomes difficult. I originally chose HTMX because I really didn&amp;#39;t enjoy working with React. Eventually I tried SvelteKit, and it completely changed my…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://parksb.github.io/en/article/41.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Reviving a 15-year-old netbook with Arch Linux&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (parksb.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48907063&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;220 points · 164 comments · by parksb&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer successfully revived a 15-year-old ASUS Eee PC netbook by installing Arch Linux 32, a community-maintained 32-bit distribution. The process involved partitioning the disk for MBR, configuring a lightweight LXQt desktop environment, and performing a hardware RAM upgrade to improve the aging machine&amp;#39;s performance. &lt;a href=&quot;https://parksb.github.io/en/article/41.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Reviving a 15-year-old netbook with Arch Linux    URL Source: https://parksb.github.io/en/article/41.html    Published Time: 2026-07-04    Markdown Content:  ## Arch Linux 32 on an Eee PC 1000HE 2026.07.04    [KO](https://parksb.github.io/article/41.html) | EN    *   [A new operating system](https://parksb.github.io/en/article/41.html#a-new-operating-system)  *   [Before installation](https://parksb.github.io/en/article/41.html#before-installation)      *   [Preparing the boot…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 2008-era netbook remains a polarizing device, remembered by some as a portable, &amp;#34;amazing moment for Linux&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48955354&quot; title=&quot;I really miss netbooks. They were an amazing moment for Linux. No surprise Microsoft killed them.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48955612&quot; title=&quot;This brings back memories. I loved my Asus Eee PC 1215p. Bought it with my own money. It was the computer I had when I was moving out of my parental home when I was 20 y/o. When I moved out I had Ubuntu installed on it, but in my student room I realised I had issues with connecting to the internet somehow. Went back to my moms and installed back Windows 7, with the Windows 98 look-and-feel-setting which was a built in option, great user experience. The last Windows machine I even used, but it…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48955768&quot; title=&quot;I too had it and remember it fondly, it got me through my studies. Very portable machine. I eventually swapped it for a thinkpad which I loved even more. Now I’m with a MacBook Air for the time being, but I think I’ll get another thinkpad when the time comes&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt; and by others as a &amp;#34;disrespectful&amp;#34; class of e-waste that was painfully slow even when new &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48955519&quot; title=&quot;These 2008-2010 era netbooks are impossible to use as a desktop. They were already painfully slow when they were new, so much so that OEMs shipped them dual booting a stripped down OS. I had an HP Mini. It had a weird 1024x600 display panel, and a lot of applications expect you to have at least 1024x768. Sometimes apps would work fine until they opened a modal that was just a bit too tall, and you had to pray that Enter or Escape did something reasonable. A few years ago I installed Debian,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48960191&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand the unwarranted and ongoing care and enthusiasm for this category of e-waste that was forcibly put upon us. They came out in 2008, were sold until 2010, had literally less performance than a 2000 Pentium III CPU, were lauded from pundits left and right, and probably the school/hand-me-down laptops of that age (like today&amp;#39;s e-waste class Chromebooks). Especially when Acer and whatever had proper laptops with proper Intel SU-class CPUs and 3-4 GB RAM for the same price. I…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While users recall fond anecdotes of using them for travel or studies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48955612&quot; title=&quot;This brings back memories. I loved my Asus Eee PC 1215p. Bought it with my own money. It was the computer I had when I was moving out of my parental home when I was 20 y/o. When I moved out I had Ubuntu installed on it, but in my student room I realised I had issues with connecting to the internet somehow. Went back to my moms and installed back Windows 7, with the Windows 98 look-and-feel-setting which was a built in option, great user experience. The last Windows machine I even used, but it…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48955768&quot; title=&quot;I too had it and remember it fondly, it got me through my studies. Very portable machine. I eventually swapped it for a thinkpad which I loved even more. Now I’m with a MacBook Air for the time being, but I think I’ll get another thinkpad when the time comes&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, they highlight significant technical hurdles such as non-standard 1024x600 screen resolutions that broke modern UI modals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48955519&quot; title=&quot;These 2008-2010 era netbooks are impossible to use as a desktop. They were already painfully slow when they were new, so much so that OEMs shipped them dual booting a stripped down OS. I had an HP Mini. It had a weird 1024x600 display panel, and a lot of applications expect you to have at least 1024x768. Sometimes apps would work fine until they opened a modal that was just a bit too tall, and you had to pray that Enter or Escape did something reasonable. A few years ago I installed Debian,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48955616&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Sometimes apps would work fine until they opened a modal that was just a bit too tall, and you had to pray that Enter or Escape did something reasonable. Do you mean that the titlebar would be off screen so you couldn&amp;#39;t move/close the window? https://xkcd.com/1479/ On the Xfce desktop at least there&amp;#39;s a nice shortcut, alt+drag with left mouse button to move any window, and alt+drag with right mouse button to resize it. That&amp;#39;s honestly the Linux thing I miss most when using any other OS.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt; and confusing 32-bit/64-bit hardware mismatches &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48955519&quot; title=&quot;These 2008-2010 era netbooks are impossible to use as a desktop. They were already painfully slow when they were new, so much so that OEMs shipped them dual booting a stripped down OS. I had an HP Mini. It had a weird 1024x600 display panel, and a lot of applications expect you to have at least 1024x768. Sometimes apps would work fine until they opened a modal that was just a bit too tall, and you had to pray that Enter or Escape did something reasonable. A few years ago I installed Debian,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48956118&quot; title=&quot;There was also the scenario where the CPU was 64 bit but the EFI was 32 bit. Booting a 32 bit OS was fine, but 64 bit OS&amp;#39; generally came with a 64 bit bootloader, so you had to do a special song and dance to load a 32 bit bootloader with a 64 bit OS.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite their limitations, some still find value in reviving them for distraction-free writing or lightweight server tasks like Samba &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48955519&quot; title=&quot;These 2008-2010 era netbooks are impossible to use as a desktop. They were already painfully slow when they were new, so much so that OEMs shipped them dual booting a stripped down OS. I had an HP Mini. It had a weird 1024x600 display panel, and a lot of applications expect you to have at least 1024x768. Sometimes apps would work fine until they opened a modal that was just a bit too tall, and you had to pray that Enter or Escape did something reasonable. A few years ago I installed Debian,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48955435&quot; title=&quot;I have one of these in a closet and wondered for years about how to turn it in a distraction free word processor/simple digital typewriter. Always loved the netbook form factor, and they were cheap! Funny thing is that probably I also have some 2GB DDR2 stick somewhere. Last thing I need to check for is the battery, I presume it is completely down after all those years. Anyway, this article will be very handy for this side project. Thank you!&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48956749&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; They were already painfully slow when they were new Mostly, yes. I had an acer aspire one d250 (similar specs to that in the article) and i worked mostly okay under linux for light development work, meaning i was in high school doing java development with emacs and running apache ant by hand. Other than that yeah they were painfully slow. Also i bought a similar machine at a flea market for like 20€ and was sorely disappointed to find out it had a Broadcom wifi chip which is a pain to work…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-07-13</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-07-13</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://raymyers.org/post/zed-creator-calls-spade-a-spade/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Zig Creator Calls Spade a Spade, Anthropic Blows Smoke&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (raymyers.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48889637&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1545 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 784 comments · by crowdhailer&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Zig creator Andrew Kelley and others are criticizing Anthropic for using Bun’s &amp;#34;agentic&amp;#34; rewrite from Zig to Rust as a marketing stunt, arguing the migration masks poor engineering practices and over-reliance on AI while promoting a narrative that software engineering is becoming obsolete. &lt;a href=&quot;https://raymyers.org/post/zed-creator-calls-spade-a-spade/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Zig Creator Calls Spade a Spade, Anthropic Blows Smoke    URL Source: https://raymyers.org/post/zed-creator-calls-spade-a-spade/    Markdown Content:  &amp;gt; I harass the sea with my tiny boat and am called a pirate, you do it with a great fleet and are called a king.    **Anthropic is actively campaigning to end software engineering**. They need you to believe they can do that. Well, maybe it’s not you that they need to convince. Maybe it’s your C-Suite, various world leaders, or the manager of…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the fallout from Anthropic&amp;#39;s Rust rewrite of Bun, with many users criticizing Zig creator Andrew Kelley’s response as a &amp;#34;sour opinion piece&amp;#34; and a personal attack that could deter future users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48889725&quot; title=&quot;Did we read the same Anthropic and Andrew Kelly&amp;#39;s posts? Anthropic is not in the programming language market; their post about rewriting Bun in Rust is full of technical details that led to improving the end product for their users. Zig&amp;#39;s response is a sour opinion piece full of personal attacks. For context, I&amp;#39;m using Codex and have no interest in either Zig or Rust, so just observing this drama from the sidelines.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48889950&quot; title=&quot;I think like most people, I don’t have a problem with Andrew “calling a spade a spade,” even if I find his reasoning motivated. The bigger problem with the post is that it talks out of both ends of the mouth: it’s clearly meant as a personal attack, but also insists that it isn’t. When I read the post, my first thought was that I wouldn’t want to build things in Zig, because any technical decision I make, good or bad, might subject me to this kind of article from their BDFL. I can’t conceive of…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48889843&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, exactly. It&amp;#39;s weird that Zig even responded to that. Imagining that your studio switched from Unity to Unreal and Unity proceeded to release a hit piece attacking your codebase quality and workplace environment.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the rewrite is technically questionable because it initially produced &amp;#34;unsafe Rust&amp;#34; with zero battle-testing compared to the original Zig code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48890300&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s so much good stuff in this post. Can&amp;#39;t help to think of a recent HN post about most AI-generated projects being abandoned within months. Why? Because value of a project is not in the code produced. It&amp;#39;s in the amount of battle-testing that code has seen. Battle-tested, mature code &amp;gt; fresh rewrite. Existing Zig codebase has seen X amount of battle-testing. Rust rewrite: 0 (except -I&amp;#39;m assuming- passing test suites). Also: &amp;#39;this was a port to unsafe Rust, allowing a literal file-by-file…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that a transliteration provides a necessary foundation for iterative safety improvements &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48890469&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Now if that&amp;#39;s further migrated to safe Rust, put into production &amp;amp; gathered feedback from lots of users, yes then you have something. Obviously they have to start somewhere if they want to get to safe rust with a considerable degree of battle testing.  So they decided to start with just a transliteration and go from there. I think the Zig people are really just concerned that maybe Zig itself is a DOA language because it doesn&amp;#39;t offer enough over C for any serious use and their flagship…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48890404&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; How is that better than the Zig codebase you started with? In contrast with the Zig codebase, you now have clear well-scoped unsafe boundaries you can iteratively fix one by one. This was not the case before.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, commenters suggest that AI-generated projects often lack value because the absence of &amp;#34;blood, sweat, and tears&amp;#34; leads to a lack of depth, polish, and long-term commitment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48890454&quot; title=&quot;They get abandoned because they get generated on a whim. Sunk cost fallacy can be a feature: if you have spent a lot of blood, sweat, and tears on a project, you are more likely to push it through adversity and the doldrums that inevitably one will encounter. If all it took was one of those momentarily brilliant ideas and a prompt on Claude to produce something, there is no attachment whatsoever to it. Speaking as the ‘average programmer’, I have dozens of brilliant ideas per day that don’t…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48891407&quot; title=&quot;A drum I&amp;#39;ve been banging increasingly often recently is that having friction and time to work ideas over in your mind adds huge amounts of value. Vibe coded projects have this very specific, well, vibe to them where you can clearly see that the lack of time to digest has allowed the person to not challenge their own worst impulses. You can see it in the feature bloat, the lack of depth and polish in core features and the wild asides you tend to talk yourself out of still on display.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48891138&quot; title=&quot;It’s the same reason why everyone doesn’t wanna read LLM generated blog posts. The agreement used to be generally that you would spend more time writing than I would have to spend reading and when the agreement changes the quality changes as well.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48886741&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ask HN: Add flag for AI-generated articles&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48886741&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1093 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 458 comments · by levkk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Hacker News user is proposing the addition of a specific flag or indicator for AI-generated articles to allow readers to identify and skip such content without necessarily affecting the post&amp;#39;s ranking. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48886741&quot; title=&quot;Should HN add the ability to flag articles as AI-generated? This doesn&amp;amp;#x27;t have to act as a regular flag, i.e., it won&amp;amp;#x27;t de-rank the article; it could just show up as an indicator, allowing others (like myself) who don&amp;amp;#x27;t like reading AI-generated text, to skip it.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Open questions:&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;1. Why is the regular voting system not enough?&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;2. Should HN change in response to the gen AI era? It has been successful not changing fundamentals.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hacker News moderator dang notes that while AI-generated text is banned for comments, the community is currently in an &amp;#34;arms race&amp;#34; where readers are developing &amp;#34;allergic sensitivities&amp;#34; to LLM-style writing, often relegating it to a low-status category &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48887149&quot; title=&quot;We don&amp;#39;t allow genai text on HN itself - see https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html#generated and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47340079 . How to enforce it is a separate question, of course, but the rule exists. We don&amp;#39;t have a similar rule yet about article content but my sense is that the community mostly doesn&amp;#39;t want to read it—or, to put it more conservatively, discounts it. This is why we see so many &amp;#39;just show me the prompt&amp;#39; responses, along with others like this:…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that high-quality, indistinguishable AI content shouldn&amp;#39;t matter &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48887196&quot; title=&quot;Nobody wants to label their stuff as AI generated because they removed credibility. Communities can flag posts as AI generated based on speculation and telltales but it won’t be 100% and will take extra work. I think the era of the blog is simply dead now and that’s mostly ok. Blogspam and corporate blogs had killed quality bogs ages ago even before AI was a thing. The real question is what replaces it. Oh and of course the $64k question is this: if an AI generated article is indistinguishable…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that AI authorship makes it impossible to meaningfully engage with the material or trust the author&amp;#39;s depth of knowledge &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48888422&quot; title=&quot;I think classifying it as an allergy or a status thing is a little too glib. I’ve read and reviewed, conservatively, hundreds of AI generated documents for work, and “written”/commissioned a bunch too. My biggest issue is that it’s impossible to engage with and give feedback on an AI written document, because it’s impossible to know whether misconceptions or gaps are because the author doesn’t understand the material deeply enough or the author does but the AI doesn’t and the author’s not…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. To address this, HN may eventually implement a flagging system that allows users to specify &amp;#34;AI-generated&amp;#34; as a reason for reporting a post &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48887149&quot; title=&quot;We don&amp;#39;t allow genai text on HN itself - see https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html#generated and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47340079 . How to enforce it is a separate question, of course, but the rule exists. We don&amp;#39;t have a similar rule yet about article content but my sense is that the community mostly doesn&amp;#39;t want to read it—or, to put it more conservatively, discounts it. This is why we see so many &amp;#39;just show me the prompt&amp;#39; responses, along with others like this:…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48887907&quot; title=&quot;Damn you people for asking good questions that go straight to the fuzzy areas! I don&amp;#39;t know for sure yet. But you&amp;#39;re right that that would follow from what I said. What I do know is that users should flag articles that they think don&amp;#39;t belong on HN. But this should rely on their reading of https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and not just be based on a like/dislike reaction. That is, users should flag articles that they think break the site guidelines, not just ones they dislike.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some users remain skeptical, noting that pointing out AI content can lead to community backlash &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48887237&quot; title=&quot;The times I&amp;#39;ve pointed point out pretty blatant AI comments, I get nuked with downvotes. So often that I&amp;#39;ve stopped pointing them out. Before you say I&amp;#39;m just falsely calling them out, it&amp;#39;s typical ChatGPT style of either very amicable or Nobel Laureate tone, lots of formatting, with a couple of paragraphs and then a clever one-line punchline at the end. If you look at those commenters their history, it&amp;#39;s all like that. Either generated or assisted. For older accounts you can see the steep…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt; or that the site&amp;#39;s ties to AI investment may hinder strict enforcement &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48886918&quot; title=&quot;Considering YC invests in AI I doubt you’ll get anything of the sort. Too many people here also think you just have to give in and accept (abuser mentality IMO).&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lyrebirddreaming.com/post/the-graph-that-should-be-front-page-news&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A graph that should be front-page news&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lyrebirddreaming.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48888331&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;694 points · 448 comments · by rakel_rakel&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Direct observations show that sea-surface temperatures in the equatorial Pacific have surged entirely outside of historical records, signaling an unprecedented warming trend that threatens to destabilize global weather patterns, ecosystems, and human infrastructure. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lyrebirddreaming.com/post/the-graph-that-should-be-front-page-news&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Graph That Should Be Front-Page News    URL Source: https://www.lyrebirddreaming.com/post/the-graph-that-should-be-front-page-news    Published Time: 2026-07-10T22:36:42.459Z    Markdown Content:  Every so often the Earth produces a signal that is impossible to ignore. This graph is one of them. It shows sea-surface temperatures in the Niño 3.4 region of the equatorial Pacific, one of the most important parts of the Earth&amp;#39;s climate system. Each blue line represents a different year since…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on a graph depicting extreme sea surface temperature anomalies, which some users argue is statistically significant while others question the validity of claiming a &amp;#34;1 in 7000 years event&amp;#34; based on only 29 years of data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48890425&quot; title=&quot;According to https://climatecasino.substack.com/p/some-monsters-are-real , this is a 1 in 7000 years event (i.e. 3.5 sigmas).&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48890508&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not sure how you can make that claim with only 29 years of data without making some pretty big assumptions about the underlying distribution.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters are divided on the solution: some advocate for &amp;#34;green populism&amp;#34; through massive subsidies for clean infrastructure rather than unpopular lifestyle restrictions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48894895&quot; title=&quot;the problem with this kind of article is half of them push a doom angle and the other half talk about carbon footprint. both of them have the same effect making people give up or do useless lifestyle changes that do nothing for the environment. we should be pushing for backend changes that are invisible but actually make things better. that means massive subsidies to build out clean power and electrify everything. politicians right now are either doing &amp;#39;think of the corporations we need to…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, while others argue that the current economic system and misaligned incentives make meaningful change impossible &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48890972&quot; title=&quot;the ignorance is a consequence of our societies system of incentives. everything keeps pointing back towards that each time theres an event like this. But if we aren&amp;#39;t going to attach an economic price for emissions then it remains an externality and not a recognized reality to the economy. The current US administration is playing a leading role in keeping it that way. And voters keep voting for it. Incentives.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48891101&quot; title=&quot;The economic system itself is incompatible with the physical reality of a finite planet. The ones steering society choose to crash and ruin everything rather than to jeopardize their positions in power. That obvious failure in morals and ethics, basic principles of adult responsibility really, is made possible by a lack of rational reflection in the populace. Objective truth has to take precedence over subjective desires when it comes to existential questions. Currently it does not.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant debate regarding the author&amp;#39;s rhetoric, with some finding his &amp;#34;human cancer&amp;#34; philosophy extreme and others criticizing the article&amp;#39;s layout for burying the lead &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48891749&quot; title=&quot;The author of that Climate Casino post has some... strong views. So you might want to bear this in mind when reading his analysis: &amp;#39;The human cancer is destructive to every living thing, as humans continue to eat the planet into oblivion. As someone who values “everything else,” I would be one of the first to rally behind the NTHE philosophy if it had any scientific basis at all. I want the human cancer gone from this planet.&amp;#39; https://climatecasino.substack.com/p/unfortunately-the-end-o...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48890091&quot; title=&quot;If it should be front-page news, shouldn&amp;#39;t it also be at the top of the article, rather than right at the bottom?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/07/13/lapd-lets-contract-with-surveillance-giant-flock-expire-citing-serious-concerns-over-civil-liberties-and-privacy/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LAPD lets contract with surveillance giant Flock expire&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techcrunch.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48893947&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;473 points · 414 comments · by forks&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Los Angeles Police Department is ending its contract with surveillance company Flock Safety, citing serious concerns regarding civil liberties, data privacy, and the potential misuse of its license plate recognition camera network. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/07/13/lapd-lets-contract-with-surveillance-giant-flock-expire-citing-serious-concerns-over-civil-liberties-and-privacy/&quot; title=&quot;Title: LAPD lets contract with surveillance giant Flock expire, citing ‘serious concerns’ over civil liberties and privacy    URL Source: https://techcrunch.com/2026/07/13/lapd-lets-contract-with-surveillance-giant-flock-expire-citing-serious-concerns-over-civil-liberties-and-privacy/    Published Time: 2026-07-13T14:13:38+00:00    Markdown Content:  The Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) is reportedly ending its deal with Flock Safety, a surveillance company that helps law enforcement track…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The LAPD&amp;#39;s contract expiration highlights a &amp;#34;fake exit&amp;#34; problem where Flock Safety retains ownership of cameras and poles, allowing them to continue harvesting data for other agencies even after a city cancels &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48896023&quot; title=&quot;The best part is that flock owns the cameras and the poles so even when the contract expires the cameras keep running and recording data that flock can sell to e.g. CHP, LASD, FBI, Palantir; and LAPD can just call them and access the data the flock scam was engineered to be resilient to political pressure by giving departments and jursidictions this fake exit ability while the data continues to be harvested, it is a noose that only tightens; the amount of flock cameras recording only ever goes…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48894370&quot; title=&quot;This is good. But unfortunately it doesn&amp;#39;t mean the Flock cameras will be removed because the city doesn&amp;#39;t own them. Flock does. And Flock will likely want to keep them there. In other cities when the contract is canceled or let expire Flock prevented those cities from removing the cameras. Some had to resort to covering them with trash bags because they could not legally remove them. This happened in Dayton, Ohio and many other cities.…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that better auditing of police behavior is the solution to potential abuse &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48894580&quot; title=&quot;Why would you trust the city more than Flock. One of the common claimed abuses of Flock data is city cops using it to stalk exes and crushes. The problem with Flock is not who owns the data, it&amp;#39;s the potential for abuse.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48895161&quot; title=&quot;I wonder why we aren&amp;#39;t addressing the real problem which seems to be cops behaving completely unethically. Their job is about enforcing the system that codifies our societies agreed up and codified rules of ethics. They should be obsessed with this the same way people here obsess over system performance, correctness, etc! If we cannot trust them with the very basics of ethical behavior they are absolutely in the wrong job and there need to be very clear consequences.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48894768&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know, I&amp;#39;d prefer cops have access to technology that helps them apprehend criminals and enforce the law. Better audits and accountability are the solution, not removing technology.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others point to the extreme difficulty of physical removal, noting instances where officials faced felony charges for taking down cameras or cities had to resort to covering them with trash bags because Flock refused to remove the hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48896221&quot; title=&quot;Yeah it&amp;#39;s kinda crazy you can&amp;#39;t legally take them down even if they are banned/contract expires. IKE Skelton, a county commissioner took it into his own hands and they were pressing felony charges on him. Not sure what ended up happening. Basically flock wouldn&amp;#39;t respond to take them down, he felt it was his duty to remove them, he brought them back to his office, and then the state hunted him down. Here is a podcast about it. https://internationalflavor.podbean.com/e/the-surveillance-s...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48894370&quot; title=&quot;This is good. But unfortunately it doesn&amp;#39;t mean the Flock cameras will be removed because the city doesn&amp;#39;t own them. Flock does. And Flock will likely want to keep them there. In other cities when the contract is canceled or let expire Flock prevented those cities from removing the cameras. Some had to resort to covering them with trash bags because they could not legally remove them. This happened in Dayton, Ohio and many other cities.…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48897470&quot; title=&quot;In this case, law enforcement selectively enforced local laws. So the commissioner exhausted his options. And flock didn&amp;#39;t seem to be bothered by breaking the local laws and their action was inaction . So what else are you suppose to do? I think it&amp;#39;s reasonable to decide that if no one is enforcing the new local law, that it may be the commissioners purview and authority to enforce after exhausting all his options. Charging the commissioner with felony theft is clearly just bullying at that…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant disagreement over whether the primary threat is the private ownership of data or the inherent potential for law enforcement to misuse surveillance for personal stalking and unethical behavior &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48894580&quot; title=&quot;Why would you trust the city more than Flock. One of the common claimed abuses of Flock data is city cops using it to stalk exes and crushes. The problem with Flock is not who owns the data, it&amp;#39;s the potential for abuse.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48895161&quot; title=&quot;I wonder why we aren&amp;#39;t addressing the real problem which seems to be cops behaving completely unethically. Their job is about enforcing the system that codifies our societies agreed up and codified rules of ethics. They should be obsessed with this the same way people here obsess over system performance, correctness, etc! If we cannot trust them with the very basics of ethical behavior they are absolutely in the wrong job and there need to be very clear consequences.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/a_green_being/status/2076598897779020159&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Grok CLI uploaded the whole home directory to GCS&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48892468&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;438 points · 404 comments · by denysvitali&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A security researcher reported that the Grok command-line interface inadvertently uploaded their entire home directory to Google Cloud Storage. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/a_green_being/status/2076598897779020159&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;a_green_being&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2076598897779020159&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;a_green_being&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2076598897779020159&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The consensus among commenters is that users should never rely on &amp;#34;in-band signaling&amp;#34; or vendor promises to protect their data, but should instead use established OS-level security like sandboxing, containers, or restricted user accounts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48893529&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand why the AI world does this. We don&amp;#39;t need new security. We have security at home. It starts with sudo -u restricteduser myagent Your OS knows how to restrict access to things, you don&amp;#39;t have to trust a pinkey promise from a vendor.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48892786&quot; title=&quot;why do people give these LLMs full access to everything and then complain when it does somethign stupid? that is what sandboxes are for.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48894112&quot; title=&quot;I will keep banging this drum until people listen: Trying to use markdown files to limit access should never be treated as a security guarantee at all. This is a form of in-band signalling that goes into a machine that, among other things, tries to read between the lines of your requests, extrapolate user desires, and please the user. The only sane way to address this is using a control plane. A well-built harness can do this; a sandbox can do this; hell, a carefully-chosen `umask` can do this;…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48893015&quot; title=&quot;The real solution to these kind of problems is sandboxing. I use podman through a bash script to launch a container whenever I want an agent to work on one of my repos. When done I just generate git patches and port back everything generated. In this way I&amp;#39;m not afraid of letting the agents totally lose on my computer.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Many argue that giving a non-deterministic text generator full system access is a fundamental security failure, with some pointing to &amp;#34;horrific engineering practices&amp;#34; at xAI for allowing such behavior &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48893768&quot; title=&quot;Why would you give a non-deterministic text generator a user account? It’s not a person, it’s barely a tool at the software level. Restrict at the right level, in this case, a complete sandbox around it given its propensity to hallucinate and be steered by anybody.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48893340&quot; title=&quot;There are a distressing number of people in this thread who think that the agent should just be expected to do this. Yes, it is good to be paranoid, but also, the agent should never do this. Indicates horrific engineering practices at xAI.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48894401&quot; title=&quot;Why do people run and install these agents locally? No container nothing. I am running Opencode in WSL2 with the windows mounts disabled.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view these incidents as inevitable &amp;#34;spyware&amp;#34; from big tech, others emphasize that the only real solution is to strictly isolate these agents from sensitive directories &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48892849&quot; title=&quot;So many of the replies are saying that they should&amp;#39;ve restricted access using .md files and whatnot. Is really any guarantee that they even follow those? It seems like even if you ask pretty please don&amp;#39;t touch those files, there&amp;#39;s a chance they will. So many people have just willingly installed spyware on their computers and big tech calls this the next big thing.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48893277&quot; title=&quot;I am genuinely fascinated by this. I don’t like piling on especially with security vulnerabilities, but man how many red flags do you need to ignore? They won’t stop abusing us until we stop using their products.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48894167&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; They won’t stop abusing us until we stop using their products. I don&amp;#39;t use AI at all in my daily life. Work however will demand you use it. AI is not here to help people.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://get-inscribe.com/blog/apple-speech-api-benchmark.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apple&amp;#39;s new SpeechAnalyzer API, benchmarked against Whisper and its predecessor&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (get-inscribe.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48894752&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;568 points · 238 comments · by get-inscribe&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple&amp;#39;s new SpeechAnalyzer API outperformed OpenAI’s Whisper models in accuracy and speed during on-device benchmarks, proving to be three times faster than Whisper Small with a significantly lower word error rate for English transcription on macOS and iOS. &lt;a href=&quot;https://get-inscribe.com/blog/apple-speech-api-benchmark.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Apple&amp;#39;s New Speech API vs Whisper: The First Real Benchmark    URL Source: https://get-inscribe.com/blog/apple-speech-api-benchmark.html    Published Time: 2026-07-13    Markdown Content:  ## The result, up front    Apple&amp;#39;s new SpeechAnalyzer is the most accurate on-device speech engine we tested. It beat every Whisper model we ship, including Whisper Small, on both the clean and the noisy half of LibriSpeech, while running roughly three times faster than Small. And the API it replaces,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that benchmarking against older Whisper models is outdated, suggesting modern alternatives like Nvidia’s Parakeet, Nemotron, or Cohere Transcribe for better state-of-the-art comparisons &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48895462&quot; title=&quot;Whisper is the wrong model to benchmark against, or rather, there are better models that are state of the art now like Nemotron and Parakeet both by Nvidia, as well as Mistral&amp;#39;s Voxtral and Cohere Transcribe. However, what&amp;#39;s funny is, RIP to a lot of the paid apps that simply wrap Whisper, I&amp;#39;m sure Apple will make a native GUI such as a recorder app for macOS that obviates the need for these wrappers, which everyone seems to be vibe coding these days.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48895224&quot; title=&quot;Whisper small/tiny/base are almost four years old (they were not updated for Whisper v2 or v3). Is there really nothing better to benchmark against by now?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48895297&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s tons, Parakeet was the last I remember seeing which seemed to gain traction (independent lightweight implementations etc).&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While the API offers a high-quality, privacy-preserving local option for Apple users, critics note it lacks the multilingual flexibility and open-source accessibility of its competitors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48895788&quot; title=&quot;Also, this test is English-only, while a strong point of other models is to understand different languages without first having to say which one (so you don&amp;#39;t need 3 different keyboard shortcuts if you wanna dictate in 3 languages day-to-day)&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48895326&quot; title=&quot;If this isn&amp;#39;t open source/weights and can&amp;#39;t run locally, I don&amp;#39;t see how this is a replacement for Whisper or other open models, e.g. within Home Assistant.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48895559&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not open weight, but the point is to be an on device (and thus local, privacy preserving) option. The article mentions that as the caveat &amp;gt; What this means if you just want good transcription &amp;gt; If you are on a current iPhone or Mac, the best on-device transcription engine for English is already in the operating system, and the private option is no longer the compromise option&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, users express frustration with Apple&amp;#39;s historical struggles with non-American accents and doubt the API will easily displace feature-rich third-party tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48895886&quot; title=&quot;As an Australian, Apples voice models have always sucked. I&amp;#39;ve tried using stt (again) more recently and its improved, but i&amp;#39;m so tired of having to Americanize my voice to get it to figure out what the hell i&amp;#39;m saying.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48895575&quot; title=&quot;For multilingual and noisy audio the best right now is MOSS-Transcribe-Diarize which was released just a few days ago Superwhisper does a lot more than just provide a whisper/parakeet UI so I’m not sure Apple will destroy them so easily&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://scottwillsey.com/building-and-shipping-mac-and-ios-apps-without-ever-opening-xcode/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Building and shipping Mac and iOS apps without opening Xcode&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (scottwillsey.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48896665&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;551 points · 232 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By utilizing command-line tools like `xcodebuild`, `xcodegen`, and `notarytool` alongside LLM agents, developers can fully automate the building, signing, and notarization of Mac and iOS apps without ever opening the Xcode GUI after an initial one-time credential setup. &lt;a href=&quot;https://scottwillsey.com/building-and-shipping-mac-and-ios-apps-without-ever-opening-xcode/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Building and Shipping Mac and iOS Apps Without Ever Opening Xcode    URL Source: https://scottwillsey.com/building-and-shipping-mac-and-ios-apps-without-ever-opening-xcode/    Published Time: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 04:59:46 GMT    Markdown Content:  Lately, I’ve heard several Apple related podcasters talk about how bad Xcode is, and how Apple needs to make vibe-coding Mac and iOS apps better by making Xcode less inscrutable. They’re not wrong, but also I don’t understand why they’re even opening…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the security risks of running AI agents locally, with users warning that granting agents unsandboxed access to home directories can lead to the accidental exfiltration of sensitive data like SSH keys &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48899577&quot; title=&quot;One down-side to this is that it does require you to run the agent on your Mac instead of in a Sandbox. I do this too and there are lots of problems I can&amp;#39;t solve in a sandbox. I know a lot of you are throwing your hands up at the years of security practices we&amp;#39;re throwing out the window when we do that. The fact that xAI uploaded someone&amp;#39;s home directory, including their SSH keys, is giving me serious pause at my choices here. Generally, I don&amp;#39;t worry about my machine being &amp;#39;blown up&amp;#39;. I don&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48897600&quot; title=&quot;By using &amp;#39;Claude Code&amp;#39;* * and giving Anthropic all your secrets, env vars, certificates and your source code to them.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest using virtualization tools like Tart or VirtualBuddy to mitigate these risks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48899998&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; require you to run the agent on your Mac instead of in a Sandbox You don&amp;#39;t have to! All recent Macs come with nearly zero perf cost virtualization. You can easily run Mac or Linux VMs assuming same architecture. Use it all the time for development and whatever. Use Tart [1] or VirtualBuddy [2], both open-source, for a packaged solution. Or in the spirit of this post, vibe code your own wrapper around the OS API [3] More recently, there are also Apple containers [4] [1] https://tart.run/ [2]…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others caution that &amp;#34;vibe coding&amp;#34; custom security wrappers instead of using established projects is a regression to 1990s-era security practices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48899577&quot; title=&quot;One down-side to this is that it does require you to run the agent on your Mac instead of in a Sandbox. I do this too and there are lots of problems I can&amp;#39;t solve in a sandbox. I know a lot of you are throwing your hands up at the years of security practices we&amp;#39;re throwing out the window when we do that. The fact that xAI uploaded someone&amp;#39;s home directory, including their SSH keys, is giving me serious pause at my choices here. Generally, I don&amp;#39;t worry about my machine being &amp;#39;blown up&amp;#39;. I don&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48901252&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; I feel like we&amp;#39;re back to 1990&amp;#39;s security here. &amp;gt; vibe code your own wrapper around the OS API Maybe stick with one of the existing projects? Throwing out all of the edge cases and hardening that went into a security-related project just to burn a bunch of resources to generate a worse one you have to maintain yourself is 90s-level security with 2026-level inefficiency, IMO.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48901453&quot; title=&quot;Generally, assuming an RYO solution is a reasonable first approach is is a trap beginners fall into.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters also noted the recursive nature of the workflow, where LLMs are used to interpret blog posts written by LLMs to automate tools they will ultimately manage themselves &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48897146&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s kind of funny to be reading this: &amp;gt; I had Claude Code create mine: I told Claude, more or less: I want to archive, Developer ID-sign, notarize, staple, and install this app to /Applications without ever opening Xcode. Write me a script that does the whole chain and fails loudly if any step breaks. Even though the text we&amp;#39;re reading is Claude talking to us as well :) Also it was weird to see the mention of &amp;#39;ask your LLM&amp;#39; at almost every stage in the blog post: &amp;gt; point Claude Code or your…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48897424&quot; title=&quot;Claude telling us to point Claude to a web site written by Claude so that we can use Claude to create a build environment...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://19thnews.org/2026/07/noaa-climate-data-website/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Former NOAA employees built Climate.us to preserve climate data and resources&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (19thnews.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48897945&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;552 points · 216 comments · by benwerd&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://19thnews.org/2026/07/noaa-climate-data-website/&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether climate data preservation should be a taxpayer-funded government responsibility or a privately funded initiative &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48898171&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The whole thing relies on donations to keep it afloat, which is really what tax dollars are for. Hmm. I don’t believe that’s accurate.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48898269&quot; title=&quot;I agree with parent, the full quote is: &amp;#39;The whole thing relies on donations to keep it afloat, which is really what tax dollars are for.&amp;#39; I think this is a great site, love what they are doing, and support them (including a literal donation). But a government maintained website for this data is low on my list of things of what tax dollars are for. In fact, I think this is better done privately. To be clear, many of the things every US administration does including this one I also think is…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents of private efforts argue that independent oversight prevents conflicts of interest within regulatory agencies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48898177&quot; title=&quot;This may be a controversial view, but I don&amp;#39;t think we should trust the actor in charge of regulating and limiting emissions with its own supervision. The Federal Government has a plethora of agencies which regulate pollution and energy usage; how can we trust either its legislative or executive branch to ensure that their creations are effective or efficient? To that end, I hope the Trump administration&amp;#39;s actions cause independent data collection and analysis by activists and independent…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend that public funding ensures data remains a free public good rather than being gated by &amp;#34;rent-seeking&amp;#34; private APIs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48898327&quot; title=&quot;As a counter example, the government manages and collects all kinds of weather station data. But the trend is for private companies to get contracts to privatize the dissemination of that data through fee-based APIs etc. I would rather the government provide it instead of taxpayers having to pay twice to enrich some rent seeker.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48898400&quot; title=&quot;I don’t follow. I would rather the government manage the API, like what NOAA does/did.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. A notable disagreement exists regarding whether government-run APIs unfairly subsidize high-volume corporate users like Google &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48898369&quot; title=&quot;Operating an API isn’t free either and the needs and scale change dramatically for customer. So you would rather the public pay for Google to use weather data on a massive scale?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48898785&quot; title=&quot;So then we are subsidizing Google’s outsized usage of that API?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://countbinface.com&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Count Binface&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (countbinface.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48887753&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;346 points · 300 comments · by mooreds&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Count Binface is a satirical political candidate and self-described intergalactic space warrior who has contested multiple UK elections, achieving record-breaking vote totals for an alien candidate while campaigning for policies like affordable croissants and the return of Ceefax. &lt;a href=&quot;https://countbinface.com&quot; title=&quot;Title: Count Binface    URL Source: https://countbinface.com/    Markdown Content:  ## ABOUT ME    I’m an intergalactic space warrior and leader of the Recyclons from planet Sigma IX. I came to Earth in 2017 and stood against Prime Minister Theresa May (as ‘Lord Buckethead’), going went viral (in a non-Covid way). Then in 2018, after an unfortunate battle on the planet Copyright, I rewspawned in my true form as Count Binface to take on Boris Johnson in the 2019 election, where I scored a surprising…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Clacton by-election has gained international attention as major political parties stood aside, leaving Nigel Farage to face off against the satirical candidate Count Binface &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48888347&quot; title=&quot;The difference in this instance is that all of the major parties have stood aside, leaving the Clacton by-election as a race between Nigel Farage and Count Binface. Essentially it&amp;#39;s turned into an election between Farage and anyone-but-Farage. I sincerely hope the best alien wins.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48888683&quot; title=&quot;Very briefly: Farage received a &amp;#39;gift&amp;#39; of £5M. He didn&amp;#39;t tell parliament about the gift, which breaks the rules. MPs or campaigning MPs need to declare gifts and donations, as there are strict rules on who you can receive money from. The media found out about the &amp;#39;gift&amp;#39;, and Farage was going to be investigated. He resigned as MP for Clacton, which stops the investigation and triggers an election. I think his plan was for him to win again, and then be able to turn around and say &amp;#39;the people have…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users view the contest as an embarrassing sign of the UK&amp;#39;s declining political and economic standards &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48889321&quot; title=&quot;Neither Binface nor Farage have any answers for the problems the UK appears to be facing; this election feels like something specifically designed to create material for viewers of Have I Got News For You[0] to laugh at. From The Atlantic: &amp;#39;The [UK&amp;#39;s] output per person is now only just above that of Mississippi, America’s poorest state - and that slight lead is only achieved thanks to London. Outside the capital, in places where tourists do not visit, living standards fall well below…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48889374&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand why the mainstream is celebrating the total collapse of any meaningful political opposition to populists. This kind of fluffed-up 2010&amp;#39;s style optimism campaign is exactly how the establishment lost control in 2016 in both the US and the UK. I think it&amp;#39;s sad that Binface is the only one even attempting to engage in democracy at this point. He&amp;#39;s a satire but he&amp;#39;s also, seemingly, the only legitimate opposition that populists face. That should be concerning and embarrassing,…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others highlight the long British tradition of comedy candidates and Binface’s surprising intellectual caliber compared to modern politicians &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48888164&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s a long tradition in the UK of comedy candidates, notably the Monster Raving Loony Party. There&amp;#39;s even some talk of a potential Loony-Bin alliance.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48887920&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Harvey previously stood as a similar character, Lord Buckethead, but was forced to create a new character due to a dispute with the filmmaker Todd Durham, who owns the Buckethead character&amp;#39; [1]. (The videos on this website are worth the watch. Hilarious, of course. But also...Binface conjugates Latin to Sky News , and not just as a bit. I don&amp;#39;t know how I feel about the British comedy candidate outclassing half of the American elected leadership–and a good fraction of its industrial…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48888831&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I don&amp;#39;t know how I feel about the British comedy candidate outclassing half of the American elected leadership–and a good fraction of its industrial leadership–on IQ.) Your entire political system has flirted with anti-intellectualism for over a century; it used to pretend to be uneducated simpletons to appeal to the electorate (witness, e.g. the folksy “ahhm just a simple mayynn” gurning schtick of Senator John Kennedy, who literally fakes his accent and demeanour despite having a sharp…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The situation has also sparked curiosity regarding the legalities of a costumed alias holding office and whether the electorate might deliver a protest vote similar to the &amp;#34;Boaty McBoatFace&amp;#34; phenomenon &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48889043&quot; title=&quot;I have so many questions... I wonder how the legalities of this work. If people write in &amp;#39;Count Binface&amp;#39; or if that&amp;#39;s the name on the ballot, then if he wins, does that mean Jonathan David Harvey (the actual name of the guy who plays him) is elected? Does Count Binface count as an alias? If not, he required to use that name while in office - or more precisely, is he not considered a member if he goes by his own name? If he goes into the parliament building without his costume, it would be a bit…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48888683&quot; title=&quot;Very briefly: Farage received a &amp;#39;gift&amp;#39; of £5M. He didn&amp;#39;t tell parliament about the gift, which breaks the rules. MPs or campaigning MPs need to declare gifts and donations, as there are strict rules on who you can receive money from. The media found out about the &amp;#39;gift&amp;#39;, and Farage was going to be investigated. He resigned as MP for Clacton, which stops the investigation and triggers an election. I think his plan was for him to win again, and then be able to turn around and say &amp;#39;the people have…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ms.now/opinion/doge-government-efficiency-records-job-cuts-elon-musk-foia&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;DOGE is done. What happened to its records?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ms.now)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48894641&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;342 points · 297 comments · by ndsipa_pomu&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Following the formal end of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), the Trump administration is facing legal challenges over its efforts to shield the initiative&amp;#39;s records from public disclosure by claiming they are exempt from the Freedom of Information Act. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ms.now/opinion/doge-government-efficiency-records-job-cuts-elon-musk-foia&quot; title=&quot;Title: DOGE is done. What happened to its records?    URL Source: https://www.ms.now/opinion/doge-government-efficiency-records-job-cuts-elon-musk-foia    Published Time: 2026-07-12T10:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  Jul. 12, 2026, 6:00 AM EDT    The Department of Government Efficiency, which carried out the most transformative restructuring of the federal government in a generation, has [formally…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has sparked intense debate over whether it targeted genuine waste or dismantled essential, high-functioning systems. Critics argue that by firing administrative staff at the NIH, the initiative has crippled scientific research and created a funding crisis for medical institutions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48895393&quot; title=&quot;DOGE fired a whole bunch of NIH staff that processed high scoring grants to get them ready for Notices of Awards (the official document that starts moving funds, etc). Meanwhile, the administration now requires final approval of any grant by non NIH political staff. Consequently, Science is slowing down (and that is outside of other shenanigans). What used to take 3 months is taking 9 or more. For the many medical research Institutions where the dominant system for professors is soft money (no…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, while others point to the shutdown of USAID as a move that could lead to hundreds of thousands of deaths &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48895412&quot; title=&quot;I would like to personally thank Elon, &amp;#39;big balls&amp;#39; and the rest of DOGE for causing hundreds of thousands of deaths [1] by shutting down USAID! Also an honorable for bringing the screwworm to the US. Good job everyone, you guys did it! [1] https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/usaid-shutdown-has-led-to-hund...&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters maintain that federal waste is rampant in areas like defense procurement and healthcare &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48895025&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; There isn&amp;#39;t really much waste in federal spending. There&amp;#39;s actually a lot of waste. DOGE just didn&amp;#39;t go after it. Check out DOD and all the 9- and 10-figure programs that get canceled without delivering anything, and whose work is often useless for follow-on work. OCX is a recent example, costing around $6 billion and took so long that the program it was supposed to replace ended up just doing the work instead. Essentially nothing of OCX will be retained. This isn&amp;#39;t really unusual in the DOD.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48895095&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s plenty of waste. It doesn&amp;#39;t matter how much you pour at the top of a leaky pipeline, very little of it will make its way down to the desired recipients. You&amp;#39;re spending $15,000 per capita per year on healthcare for what can at best be described as mediocre outcomes. The Netherlands spends $6000 and is near the tops of the charts when it comes to quality. What&amp;#39;s the ratio of effectiveness per dollar we&amp;#39;re looking at here? 5 to 1? It doesn&amp;#39;t matter whether or not people like it when you…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that DOGE functioned as a &amp;#34;con&amp;#34; that bypassed lawful legislative processes to eliminate programs that were actually efficient and popular &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48894880&quot; title=&quot;Any time people talk about cutting government spending, they are exploiting naivety of the audience. When you actually cut, nobody likes it. There isn&amp;#39;t really much waste in federal spending. Most programs are important to somebody for good reasons. From this perspective, DOGE was always an obvious con.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48895393&quot; title=&quot;DOGE fired a whole bunch of NIH staff that processed high scoring grants to get them ready for Notices of Awards (the official document that starts moving funds, etc). Meanwhile, the administration now requires final approval of any grant by non NIH political staff. Consequently, Science is slowing down (and that is outside of other shenanigans). What used to take 3 months is taking 9 or more. For the many medical research Institutions where the dominant system for professors is soft money (no…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. To address these issues more constructively, some users suggested a focus on radical transparency through public datasets or empowering existing oversight bodies like the GAO &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48894929&quot; title=&quot;One of my biggest criticisms of DOGE that I have not heard elsewhere is - why can&amp;#39;t we have a &amp;#39;Department of Government Transparency&amp;#39;. Giving Elon the ability to judge, jury and executioner any congressionally approved spending he wants has its own legal issues, but I do think there is a lot of value in having a massive publicly available dataset on where the money goes. I envision something similar to a massive sankey diagram like dataset in a public git repo that anyone could access and…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48894732&quot; title=&quot;Perhaps a GAO look-see is needed? * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Government_Accou... May be worth noting/reminding of the 17 inspectors general that were fired on the first Friday (2025-01-24) of Trump 2.0 administration: * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_dismissals_of_U.S._inspec...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.whois.com/whois/t.me&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Telegram&amp;#39;s t.me domain has been suspended&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (whois.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48897878&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;359 points · 279 comments · by Tiberium&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Telegram&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;t.me&amp;#34; domain has been placed on &amp;#34;serverHold&amp;#34; status by the registry, a technical designation that effectively suspends the domain&amp;#39;s functionality. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.whois.com/whois/t.me&quot; title=&quot;Title: Whois t.me    URL Source: https://www.whois.com/whois/t.me    Markdown Content:  Raw Whois Data    Domain Name: t.me  Registry Domain ID: REDACTED  Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com  Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com/domains/search.aspx?ci=8990  Updated Date: 2026-07-13T19:24:55Z  Creation Date: 2010-05-20T18:50:32Z  Registry Expiry Date: 2035-05-20T18:50:32Z  Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC  Registrar IANA ID: 146  Registrar Abuse Contact Email: ![Image 1:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The suspension of Telegram’s `t.me` domain has sparked widespread disbelief that a major platform would rely on GoDaddy, a registrar criticized for its lack of transparency and tendency to take adverse actions against users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48898298&quot; title=&quot;Yep, I would never use a registrar called &amp;#39;go daddy&amp;#39;. It always sounded like a registrar for noobs that will take adverse actions to &amp;#39;protect&amp;#39; you and this only confirms this.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48899035&quot; title=&quot;I can&amp;#39;t believe they use GoDaddy as a registrar.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48899009&quot; title=&quot;Telegram is currently the target of legal/regulatory investigations by Russia (alleged extremism), France (likewise), and India (alleged facilitation of national exam leaking/cheating). I&amp;#39;m guessing the latter since it&amp;#39;s the most recent and arguably has the most fiscal heft. Also very surprised to see Telegram was reliant on GoDaddy, notorious for its lack of transparency.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48899579&quot; title=&quot;insanity. it almost undercuts everything they do.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Commentators speculate the suspension stems from ongoing legal investigations in Russia, France, or India, leading to recommendations that services switch to more resilient TLDs like `.is` &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48899358&quot; title=&quot;.is might be a choice, since archive.is continues to be available despite many legal threats You don&amp;#39;t have to be an Icelandic national to register a .is&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48899009&quot; title=&quot;Telegram is currently the target of legal/regulatory investigations by Russia (alleged extremism), France (likewise), and India (alleged facilitation of national exam leaking/cheating). I&amp;#39;m guessing the latter since it&amp;#39;s the most recent and arguably has the most fiscal heft. Also very surprised to see Telegram was reliant on GoDaddy, notorious for its lack of transparency.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48899435&quot; title=&quot;.is is a very resilient TLD indeed, and it&amp;#39;s well known in some communities.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Amidst the disruption, some users highlighted the importance of using self-managed redirects to maintain control over third-party links during such outages &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48898463&quot; title=&quot;Of course we launched our Telegram channel just this weekend, so I am feeling pretty happy that I enforced a 15-year old SOP that says &amp;#39;never email links to 3rd-party domains ; always use a redirect&amp;#39;... Swapping the redirect now for telegram.me, which hopefully won&amp;#39;t go down simultaneously&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/film/2026/jul/13/sam-neill-death-actor-dies-aged-78&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sam Neill has died&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theguardian.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48888468&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;473 points · 114 comments · by j4mie&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sam Neill, the acclaimed New Zealand actor known for his roles in *Jurassic Park*, *The Piano*, and *Peaky Blinders*, has died at age 78 following a sudden illness, though his family confirmed he remained cancer-free after a 2022 lymphoma diagnosis. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/film/2026/jul/13/sam-neill-death-actor-dies-aged-78&quot; title=&quot;Title: Sam Neill, star of Jurassic Park films, Peaky Blinders and The Piano, dies aged 78    URL Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2026/jul/13/sam-neill-death-actor-dies-aged-78    Published Time: 2026-07-13T06:41:15.000Z    Markdown Content:  [Skip to main content](https://www.theguardian.com/film/2026/jul/13/sam-neill-death-actor-dies-aged-78#maincontent)[Skip to navigation](https://www.theguardian.com/film/2026/jul/13/sam-neill-death-actor-dies-aged-78#navigation)    Close dialogue 1/4 Next…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hacker News users are mourning the loss of Sam Neill, describing him as a &amp;#34;national treasure&amp;#34; and a childhood hero whose performances were deeply influential &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48888832&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m getting old, all my childhood heroes die.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48889140&quot; title=&quot;Today New Zealand has lost a national treasure. Haere atu rā ki te okiokinga.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48891285&quot; title=&quot;Rest in peace. Like many here, his performances were hugely influential on my childhood (and adulthood). One I haven’t seen mentioned here yet is Merlin.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While he is globally recognized for *Jurassic Park*, commenters highlighted his diverse filmography, including *The Dish*, *Merlin*, and his iconic role in the 1982 film *Ivanhoe*, which remains a New Year&amp;#39;s tradition in Sweden &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48889473&quot; title=&quot;One of my favorite actors of all time.  If you haven’t seen it, watch The Dish.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48890137&quot; title=&quot;RIP. Here in Sweden the headlines mention primarily his role in Ivanhoe, a movie that has aired on Swedish TV almost every New Years for over 40 years. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivanhoe_(1982_film) He posted this video message to the Swedish people for New Years 2023: https://www.svt.se/kultur/ivanhoe-skadespelarens-nyarshalsni... Great movie.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48891285&quot; title=&quot;Rest in peace. Like many here, his performances were hugely influential on my childhood (and adulthood). One I haven’t seen mentioned here yet is Merlin.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. His performance in *Event Horizon* sparked specific debate; while some praised his memorable character shift, others criticized the &amp;#34;horror in space&amp;#34; trope and the film&amp;#39;s poor lighting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48889554&quot; title=&quot;also the Event Horizon, his change of character is something you don&amp;#39;t forget..&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48889569&quot; title=&quot;Not my favourite movie though. The horror in space trope is a very tired one. Alongside the poorly lit spaceship. Spaceships are workplaces and workplaces should provide adequate illumination so you can see what you are doing. But I LOVE what he did for the New Zealand flag.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48889664&quot; title=&quot;Event horizon.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://superdario.pawb.de&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Super Dario&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (superdario.pawb.de)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48896286&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;393 points · 99 comments · by thepasch&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Super Dario is a web-based platform or project currently featuring a &amp;#34;One More Week&amp;#34; countdown or announcement, as shared on Hacker News. &lt;a href=&quot;https://superdario.pawb.de&quot; title=&quot;Title: Super Dario: One More Week    URL Source: https://superdario.pawb.de/    Published Time: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 19:36:05 GMT    Warning: This is a cached snapshot of the original page, consider retry with caching opt-out.    Markdown Content:&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on &amp;#34;Super Dario,&amp;#34; an AI-generated platformer that users criticized for its poor physics, buggy hitboxes, and &amp;#34;vibe-slopped&amp;#34; code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48897012&quot; title=&quot;Funny idea but wow the gameplay is terrible and full of bugs. Bad hitboxes, shells that bounce in front of holes, bad physics. AI still cannot oneshot 2D platformers, the most documented videogame genre with so much source code available.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48897376&quot; title=&quot;One-shotting is a bit of a red herring, imo. Let&amp;#39;s say I wanted to build a &amp;#39;Super Dario&amp;#39; meme platformer. I would do some research, find a platformer on Codepen or Github that &amp;#39;feels&amp;#39; good, tweak it to my liking, change the sprites, and voila. I constantly have to tell agents to just &amp;#39;look it up online&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;don&amp;#39;t hallucinate your own components&amp;#39; because people have already done this a million times. Ironically, being more lazy could make these models more useful.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48897166&quot; title=&quot;Okay, so, maker here! I was expecting this to drown in the flood of /newest, so seeing so many folks get a chuckle out of this is a very pleasant surprise. The obvious spark for this was yesterday&amp;#39;s second last-minute extension of the Fable promotional window (a phrase comprised of two heavily strained words at this point), and an hour or so of back-and-forth with GLM-5.2 and Opus later, here we are. The game is, of course, unwinnable on purpose. There is no ending. The flag always escapes, the…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters argued that AI still struggles to replicate the polished mechanics Nintendo perfected in 1985, the creator clarified that the game is a satirical, unwinnable simulation of the AI industry where the &amp;#34;win condition&amp;#34; is simply closing the tab &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48897192&quot; title=&quot;Just amazing how right a few people at Nintendo got this in 1985, and its still so easy to get it absolutely wrong.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48897166&quot; title=&quot;Okay, so, maker here! I was expecting this to drown in the flood of /newest, so seeing so many folks get a chuckle out of this is a very pleasant surprise. The obvious spark for this was yesterday&amp;#39;s second last-minute extension of the Fable promotional window (a phrase comprised of two heavily strained words at this point), and an hour or so of back-and-forth with GLM-5.2 and Opus later, here we are. The game is, of course, unwinnable on purpose. There is no ending. The flag always escapes, the…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite technical flaws and difficulties in generating consistent sprite animations, some noted the irony of criticizing a project that likely would not have been built at all without AI assistance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48897356&quot; title=&quot;Yep. Additionally having experimented pretty heavily in this space, I&amp;#39;ll state that even with state-of-the-art models (like NB Pro or GPT-Image-2), good luck getting them to generate sprite sheets with consistent frames for animation particularly if you&amp;#39;re shooting for a pixel art aesthetic. I&amp;#39;ve made a few sprite-based animations with AI assistance but it still required a fair amount of manual photoshop (or in my case Aseprite) post-processing.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48896696&quot; title=&quot;There are plenty of critiques of the AI labs but it&amp;#39;s a bit ironic leveling criticism in a game which was obviously one-shotted by their models and which would never have been made without AI&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://neow.in/cWsyMTV3&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Samsung Health app threatens data deletion if users opt out AI training&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (neow.in)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48897991&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;351 points · 103 comments · by bundie&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I cannot summarize this story because the provided link is blocked by a security verification page, preventing access to the full article content. &lt;a href=&quot;https://neow.in/cWsyMTV3&quot; title=&quot;Title: Just a moment...    URL Source: https://neow.in/cWsyMTV3    Warning: This page maybe requiring CAPTCHA, please make sure you are authorized to access this page.    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: Icon for www.neowin.net](https://www.neowin.net/favicon.ico)    ## www.neowin.net    ## Performing security verification    This website uses a security service to protect against malicious bots. This page is displayed while the website verifies you are not a bot.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Samsung’s move to delete health data for users who opt out of AI training is criticized as an abuse of privacy that effectively renders expensive hardware features unusable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48899044&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The company plans to grab four categories: your sleep, your medications, your medical records, and your cycle tracking details So you buy a device but you can&amp;#39;t effectively use half of its features because you&amp;#39;d also have to agree to send them your medical records? Ok then if I refuse, will they refund 50% of the device price since now it&amp;#39;s not usable any more?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48899826&quot; title=&quot;I had a ~2008 vintage Samsung phone with a fingerprint sensor that gave your blood oxygen level (SpO2). One day it told me something similar, I had to agree to send them data or I couldn’t use it. So I never used it again, but yeah they have been abusing their costumers a long time. This is they same company whose tvs take pictures of what you are watching and send them back to Samsung.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48899339&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I really feel like &amp;#39;grab&amp;#39; is quite condescending By all means, let&amp;#39;s use a more appropriate term, like &amp;#39;abuse&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;misappropriate&amp;#39;. It&amp;#39;s not sufficiently condescending for a company that&amp;#39;s trying to train AI on people&amp;#39;s private health data.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that cloud services necessitate a trade-off between privacy and cost, others contend that this policy likely violates GDPR because consent for data processing must be given freely without undue pressure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48899000&quot; title=&quot;shouldn&amp;#39;t this get them turbo obliterated in europe?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48899459&quot; title=&quot;Do you think those services are “free”? If you want cloud storage and syncing, it comes at a price. If you’re not paying with money, you’re paying with your privacy and freedom.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48899212&quot; title=&quot;Yes but that consent must be given freely. There can&amp;#39;t be undue pressure. Unfortunately this part is not well defined but it looks like the AI training part is not required to deliver the service to the specific user so I do think that if challenged it will be ruled afoul of GDPR.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights a long-standing pattern of data misappropriation by manufacturers, such as TVs using &amp;#34;automatic content recognition&amp;#34; to track viewing habits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48899826&quot; title=&quot;I had a ~2008 vintage Samsung phone with a fingerprint sensor that gave your blood oxygen level (SpO2). One day it told me something similar, I had to agree to send them data or I couldn’t use it. So I never used it again, but yeah they have been abusing their costumers a long time. This is they same company whose tvs take pictures of what you are watching and send them back to Samsung.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48900128&quot; title=&quot;Every TV does that unfortunately. It&amp;#39;s called automatic content recognition but every manufacturer has a different euphemism for it. It&amp;#39;s definitely not just Samsung. As bad as this is. The problem is bigger than just them.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jivx.com/densha&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A voxel Tokyo in real Japan time – ride the Yamanote line and study Japanese&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jivx.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48890959&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;379 points · 74 comments · by momentmaker&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Densha is an ambient Japanese language learning tool that allows users to study N5-level sentences while riding a virtual voxel-style Yamanote Line synced to Tokyo&amp;#39;s real-time weather and seasons. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jivx.com/densha&quot; title=&quot;Title: densha — study Japanese in a living voxel Tokyo    URL Source: https://jivx.com/densha    Warning: This page contains shadow DOM that are currently hidden, consider enabling shadow DOM processing.  Warning: This is a cached snapshot of the original page, consider retry with caching opt-out.    Markdown Content:  Ride the Yamanote line through a voxel Tokyo synced to Japan&amp;#39;s real clock, weather, and seasons. A lofi bed plays while N5 sentences are read aloud and drift by as subtitles — an ambient…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the project&amp;#39;s aesthetic and technical performance, with users identifying the high-pitched narrator as &amp;#34;Zundamon,&amp;#34; a popular Japanese TTS character &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48894737&quot; title=&quot;IIRC it&amp;#39;s a popular TTS character called ずんだもん.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users found the voice jarring or stereotypical &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48893537&quot; title=&quot;Looks nice, but what&amp;#39;s the deal with Mickey Mouse voice? Is it sponsored by Disney or something?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48894408&quot; title=&quot;Japan likes their cutesy little-girl voices.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48895342&quot; title=&quot;that&amp;#39;s just how their women sound to us. cutesy anime girls are voiced by aunties over 30.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others reported extreme CPU load and inefficient rendering methods that made the site nearly unusable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48892211&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know why, but that was an extreme load on my computer/browser. The picture changed every ten-fifteen seconds, I don&amp;#39;t know if that&amp;#39;s intentional or not, but it wasn&amp;#39;t something I wanted to watch. The computer fan ran at maximum and it was hard to get enough CPU to close the browser tab.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48894136&quot; title=&quot;If you right click on the page, you can &amp;#39;open image in new tab&amp;#39; and get an image of the current screen. I assume that means it is rendering an entirely new image each frame... which is a tad wild.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant tangent emerged regarding the reliability of German rail services compared to Japan&amp;#39;s, sparking a debate over the ethics and logistics of long train delays caused by medical emergencies or suicides &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48898082&quot; title=&quot;Meanwhile I am sitting in an InterCity&amp;#39;Express&amp;#39; train in Germany, which already started 14 minutes late, and somehow managed to drive so slowly, that at every stop another ~2 minutes were lost. Now just standing around at a stop, because of some medical emergency at the next station, and announced a delay of fucking 90 minutes. How long can it take to remove whoever causes the medical emergency from the tracks or wherever they are and continue driving? It is all so nuts here, all so idiotic.…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48898461&quot; title=&quot;Medical emergency might well be somebody committing suicide (or trying to).&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48898684&quot; title=&quot;Yep, but then what takes 1h? They must have had that multiple times already. Either get them off the tracks in whatever state they are in, or get them out of the train. I don&amp;#39;t find it to be a good reason to punish the collective amount of all train passengers in any train in the vicinity by making everyone an hour late. It seems very unprofessional.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://antirez.com/news/169&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Control the Ideas, Not the Code&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (antirez.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48891184&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;226 points · 189 comments · by surprisetalk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Antirez argues that programmers should shift their focus from reviewing line-by-line code to mastering high-level design and ideas, as AI now handles implementation more efficiently while humans provide the essential conceptual direction and quality assurance. &lt;a href=&quot;https://antirez.com/news/169&quot; title=&quot;Title: Control the ideas, not the code    URL Source: https://antirez.com/news/169    Published Time: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 04:21:56 GMT    Markdown Content:  [antirez](https://antirez.com/user/antirez) 18 hours ago. 194680 views. Look at the past history of this blog. There are many blog posts about programming with AI, a few of them date back to January 2024 (like this: [https://antirez.com/news/140](https://antirez.com/news/140)). I’m a relatively well regarded programmer, after all. I don’t have the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether AI allows developers to focus on high-level ideas rather than implementation, with some arguing that models struggle to follow custom architectures and tend to revert to common training data patterns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48892118&quot; title=&quot;I tried really hard to do this, but it turns out the models don&amp;#39;t care about your ideas and want to do what&amp;#39;s popular in their training data, so they will happily ignore anything you try to force down their throats, especially as context length grows or if you hit compaction. So to make best use of the models steer them down familiar paths, mention common pattern and frameworks, use popular packages and languages that have the high median quality online. I started my project with a few simple…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While one developer claims success in using AI for highly unconventional, &amp;#34;off the beaten path&amp;#34; projects, others suggest this requires specific skills or knowledge that are not yet industry standard &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48892232&quot; title=&quot;I do highly unusual, off the beaten path projects with AI. For instance, a game engine written entirely in LuaJIT, but allocating almost all data structures using CFFI, a very unusual, custom object-orientation DSL I designed myself, and that uses SDL3&amp;#39;s SDL_gpu library to do all rendering, a ton of GLSL 4.6 compute shaders cross compiled to SPIR-V and Metal (which constraints what GLSL can be written), and is a hybrid tile-oriented and 3D engine. Another example is my Emacs-like…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48892701&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; All I can say is skill issue. I don&amp;#39;t necessarily disagree with the overall point you&amp;#39;re making, but I think calling it a &amp;#39;skill issue&amp;#39; is a bit reductive. These are relatively new tools that are changing quickly, and the amount of flexibility in how you can use them is a lot higher than pretty much anything else we&amp;#39;ve built up patterns for in the industry in recent years. Rather than dismissing people who express having trouble producing the results you can, I feel like we should be giving…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that removing the human from the code-reading process threatens the programmer&amp;#39;s identity and overlooks the fact that execution and iteration remain more valuable than &amp;#34;dime a dozen&amp;#34; ideas &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48892662&quot; title=&quot;Very uncomfortable to read. The proposed idea of not reading the code you ostensibly wrote, doesn’t just challenge the traditional workflow or methodology, it challenges the identity of a programmer itself. For experienced, respected programmers like antirez perhaps reading and writing code truly has just gotten in the way of the ideas, but I cannot identify with that perspective. The devil is in the details, reading other peoples code (and code the LLM writes) evolves the idea itself, and…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48892769&quot; title=&quot;Ideas are a dime a dozen. All of us have half a dozen of what appear to be good ideas every. Execution matters, testing and sanity checking matters, actual engagement with users and iteration matters. Sure, we&amp;#39;re reducing the cost of idea -&amp;gt; prototype to near zero (well, as long as tokens are free or nearly free), but that just means we now have mountains of throw away code, within which there may a gem or two. Nothing yet has replaced the curating of ideas that good teams do as a matter of…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents counter that code is merely a functional machine where traditional &amp;#34;clean code&amp;#34; standards matter less than measurable outcomes and successful specifications &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48892856&quot; title=&quot;Code is not literature. It&amp;#39;s not poetry. It does not express the human spirit. Code is a machine made of symbols. Engineers do care about the beauty of their machine designs, but in the end what matters is whether the machine performs its function correctly, efficiently, affordably. What&amp;#39;s wonderful about software is that the function of software is to take input data and produce output data. Every aspect of it is measurable, if we build it to be measurable, because it&amp;#39;s data all the way down.…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mmapped.blog/posts/52-backtrack-free-cursive&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Backtrack-Free Cursive&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mmapped.blog)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48888518&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;276 points · 126 comments · by dmit&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author designed a custom cursive script for the Latin alphabet that eliminates &amp;#34;backtracking&amp;#34;—the need to lift the pen to dot letters or cross stems—by using continuous loops and auxiliary lines to improve writing flow and digital note-taking efficiency. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mmapped.blog/posts/52-backtrack-free-cursive&quot; title=&quot;Title: Backtrack-free cursive    URL Source: https://mmapped.blog/posts/52-backtrack-free-cursive    Published Time: 2026-07-12    Markdown Content:  ✑2026-07-12[penmanship](https://mmapped.blog/notes/penmanship.html)    * * *    *   [The crime](https://mmapped.blog/posts/52-backtrack-free-cursive#the-crime)  *   [The redemption](https://mmapped.blog/posts/52-backtrack-free-cursive#the-redemption)    * * *    I love writing in cursive, shaping each word in one long stroke. If you grew up learning the Latin…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a tension between writing speed and legibility, with critics arguing that minimizing pen lifts through flourishes and loops makes letters like `i`, `j`, and `t` harder to &amp;#34;lex&amp;#34; or distinguish from one another &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48889636&quot; title=&quot;This is the kind of thing that makes cursive painful to read . The `i` and `j` in this script are harder to quickly lex, and the `t` (especially in the `tt` ligature) with the added loop flourish diverges sufficiently from a standard `t` to make it hard to decipher in running text. In text, as in code, I prefer to optimize for easy reading rather than faster writing.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48894877&quot; title=&quot;As a USAian and an Old, I learned the Zaner-Bloser script in school - a cursive script that tries to minimize pen lifts, but still has &amp;#39;backtracks&amp;#39; as this article calls them, for j, i, and x. It uses a lot of the same kind of loops that this script uses, just for the simpler problem of joins. The downside of the Zaner-Bloser system, as well as Palmer and anything that derives from Spencerian cursive, is that when written quickly, the loops can make several letters only distinguishable by…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48895506&quot; title=&quot;Interestingly I had the opposite journey, I am a Young so they didn&amp;#39;t bother to teach me cursive in school, so in high school when I got into fountain pens I taught myself italic hand so that my handwriting would be more legible and easier to write with it -- but just recently I got tired of the two-stroke &amp;#39;e&amp;#39; and taught myself Zaner-Bloser instead, lol. I do definitely see the drawbacks you mentioned though, after I started getting more casual with my writing I noticed &amp;#39;l&amp;#39;s and &amp;#39;e&amp;#39;s becoming…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find backtracking in Cyrillic or Latin scripts to be a non-issue, others have abandoned cursive entirely for print or Italic hands to improve clarity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48894877&quot; title=&quot;As a USAian and an Old, I learned the Zaner-Bloser script in school - a cursive script that tries to minimize pen lifts, but still has &amp;#39;backtracks&amp;#39; as this article calls them, for j, i, and x. It uses a lot of the same kind of loops that this script uses, just for the simpler problem of joins. The downside of the Zaner-Bloser system, as well as Palmer and anything that derives from Spencerian cursive, is that when written quickly, the loops can make several letters only distinguishable by…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48889900&quot; title=&quot;Wondering how many people are like me and hate writing in cursive. I stopped using it right after graduating high school (where it was required), never used in drafts after elementary school, and only ever used normal print letters in the university (and also included TeX commands because I was typesetting lecture notes later and was figuring out the optimal command set on the fly).&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48891559&quot; title=&quot;I like writing in cursive, but I don’t see backtracking as a problem. I backtrack quite a lot in Cyrillic, even in Russian, e.g. I always underline ш and write a line over т (which looks like m) to distinguish them (otherwise they look quite similar, see the famous example лишили лилии — you might want to google it if you haven’t seen it yet). I also normally write д as ∂, which breaks the flow. Belarusian Cyrillic requires more backtracking: we have і, ў, obligatory ё, apostrophes. Never saw…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Regional variations also emerge, such as the &amp;#34;pine tree&amp;#34; shaped `t` common in older Dutch and German styles and differing methods for drawing the letter `x` &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48888996&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Only й and э require two strokes Wouldn&amp;#39;t the ф as well? &amp;gt; [for the x], I draw two mirrored c’s Isn&amp;#39;t that what everyone is doing, or are we Frenchmen the exception? For reference if the author reads this, we write the latin x exactly like the cyrillic х, i.e. reverse c, bottom-left to top-right diagonal, normal c.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48889613&quot; title=&quot;The t I&amp;#39;ve learned in school in the 90s is a single stroke. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schulausgangsschrift&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48889560&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Isn&amp;#39;t that what everyone is doing, or are we Frenchmen the exception?  &amp;gt; For reference if the author reads this, we write the latin x exactly like the cyrillic х, i.e. reverse c, bottom-left to top-right diagonal, normal c. I was taught script in the US and Italy as a child, and never learned it like this.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48889463&quot; title=&quot;Huh, I just indirectly learned from this article that the way I write a lower-case &amp;#39;t&amp;#39; in cursive is a Dutch way of doing so ( edit: sollniss&amp;#39; comment implies it was a common style in Germany too). A quick search suggests it has been replaced with an English style of &amp;#39;t&amp;#39; in the last decades too. I wonder if that makes my handwriting harder to read for anyone who isn&amp;#39;t Dutch and over 40 years old. Anyway, just bringing it up because you don&amp;#39;t need to lift up your pen to write that kind of &amp;#39;t&amp;#39;.…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/clawkwork/clawk&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Clawk – Give coding agents a disposable Linux VM, not your laptop&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48892859&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;225 points · 157 comments · by celrenheit&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clawk is an open-source tool that provides AI coding agents with disposable, network-restricted Linux VMs to safely execute commands and run code without risking the user&amp;#39;s host machine. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/clawkwork/clawk&quot; title=&quot;GitHub - clawkwork/clawk: Disposable, network-restricted Linux VMs for AI coding agents    Disposable, network-restricted Linux VMs for AI coding agents - clawkwork/clawk    [Skip to content](#start-of-content)    ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [Sign in](/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fclawkwork%2Fclawk)    Appearance settings    * Platform      + AI CODE CREATION      - [GitHub CopilotWrite better code with AI](https://github.com/features/copilot)      - [GitHub Copilot appDirect agents…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users debate whether simple OS-level isolation is sufficient for coding agents, with some arguing that a separate user account or container is enough &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48893599&quot; title=&quot;I still don&amp;#39;t understand the point of all these VMs and containers for agents. Just create a separate user on your machine without sudo privileges, switch to it in your terminal and run all the agents you want without it being able to reach your files. What am I missing?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48893238&quot; title=&quot;why not just a docker container&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48894045&quot; title=&quot;I am certainly no expert in this space so it is quite possible I&amp;#39;m missing something critical, but what seems to work for me is a Podman image I built on my computer with some basic things I need (using OpenCode, but I imagine any other agent could be used instead): FROM docker.io/archlinux:base    RUN pacman -Syu --noconfirm &amp;amp;&amp;amp; \        pacman -S --noconfirm \        base-devel \        git \        curl \        uv \        opencode &amp;amp;&amp;amp; \        pacman -Scc --noconfirm    RUN mkdir -p /etc/opencode    …&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, while others warn that shared kernels and local network services leave systems vulnerable to privilege escalation and container breakouts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48893725&quot; title=&quot;You&amp;#39;re missing the fact you&amp;#39;d be sharing a kernel with the sandboxed agent. Virtualization presents an infinitely smaller attack surface.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48893831&quot; title=&quot;Privilege escalation (e.g. setuid), world-readable files might contain sensitive data, world-writeable files, unrestricted network access (including access to all locally running services)... If you have fully patched system without zero-days and it&amp;#39;s configured in a perfect way, then, sure... Container is quite like a &amp;#39;separate user&amp;#39; except you can explicitly define what it can access. (Even if all your daemons have good auth, it&amp;#39;s now quite common for _apps_ to open listening sockets without…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48893362&quot; title=&quot;Errbody gangsta until the agent figures out it&amp;#39;s in a container and finds an exploit that lets it break out of container jail...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents of virtualization emphasize the &amp;#34;infinitely smaller attack surface&amp;#34; of VMs and the convenience of remote execution, which allows agents to continue working while a primary laptop is asleep &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48893725&quot; title=&quot;You&amp;#39;re missing the fact you&amp;#39;d be sharing a kernel with the sandboxed agent. Virtualization presents an infinitely smaller attack surface.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48894314&quot; title=&quot;I think the most secure setup, though not so convenient for the average user, is a separate machine with QEMU/KVM. The machine should be isolated adequately, such that even if compromised, it shouldn&amp;#39;t be able to cause damage or gain access to other machines. Additionally, a proxy server on your machine or elsewhere could hide sensitive credentials. A helper binary on your computer would then control spawning new disposable VMs with premade images and your SSH key. The images can be lightweight…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48893748&quot; title=&quot;If the agent is running on your machine, it will suspend when you put your laptop asleep. I prefer using a remote Linux VM to let the coding agent keep working. I’m quite happy with exe.dev for this. My laptop is asleep upstairs but I have an agent coding away in a browser tab on the tablet I’m using. I could also check on it from my phone. But it might also be nice if a setup similar to exe.dev were available for self-hosting. I have a Mac Mini that I don’t really use much.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical discussion also highlights specialized implementations, such as using microvm.nix for declarative sandboxing or managing non-root firewalls for network isolation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48893339&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; clawk forward add my-project 3000 &amp;gt; clawk network allow my-project api.example.com Can you describe the implementation details? How did you implement the firewall without root? I vibecoded virtdev, a virtual machine orchestration project just like this one: https://github.com/matheusmoreira/virtdev It was designed to not require root, and the nftables firewall ended up becoming the only exception. I&amp;#39;m very curious about how you implemented this. Did you find a better way?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48896047&quot; title=&quot;If you are a Nix flake enjoyer, I whipped up something similar to this (Claude Code-only right now) based on microvm.nix: https://github.com/cdata/katsuobushi/tree/main/lib/sandbox Some highlights: - Drives Claude Code as a quasi-subagent via &amp;#39;Channels,&amp;#39; which supports multi-turn interaction with the host and suspend / resume - Declarative configuration in the flake of exactly what is copied into the VM (besides the local project), what DNS origins are allowed, etc. - Shared access to host Nix…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2026/07/another-ridiculous-interrail-holiday-6379km-and-13-countries-over-7-weeks/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interrail: 6,379Km and 13 Countries over 7 weeks&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (shkspr.mobi)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48889350&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;193 points · 137 comments · by coinfused&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A couple completed a seven-week, 6,379km Interrail journey through 13 European countries, utilizing first-class passes and ferries to travel from London to Scandinavia, the Baltics, and back via Central Europe. &lt;a href=&quot;https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2026/07/another-ridiculous-interrail-holiday-6379km-and-13-countries-over-7-weeks/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Another Ridiculous Interrail Holiday - 6,379Km and 13 Countries over 7 weeks    URL Source: https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2026/07/another-ridiculous-interrail-holiday-6379km-and-13-countries-over-7-weeks/    Published Time: 2026-07-12T12:34:43+01:00    Markdown Content:  Last year, my wife and I went on a [5,025 Km Interrail adventure](https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2025/06/5025-km-21-journeys-and-10-countries-in-30-days-an-interrailing-adventure/). We got the month-long unlimited pass and saw 10…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Interrail was once a rite of passage defined by spontaneous travel and &amp;#34;complete freedom,&amp;#34; many commenters note that its popularity declined with the rise of budget airlines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48889930&quot; title=&quot;The best part of interailling for me was turning up to a major train station, looking at the giant departure board, choosing an enigmatic destination and just getting on the train. No booking or reservations or even planning at any point. Is this not possible any more?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48892101&quot; title=&quot;Interrail used to be more popular years ago among young adults who had just finished high school. I did it with a few friends at the time, and it was an incredible experience of self-reliance, patience and just complete freedom. My best memory is sleeping under the stars outside the train station of Biarritz, France, on a mild summer night next to the Atlantic Ocean. Such a refreshing sleep. The next night we did the same, sleeping under the stars outside the train station of Modane, France,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48889931&quot; title=&quot;Is interrail still a thing? It was popular in Europe back in the 70s and 80s, when young people could buy a interrail pass. Many of my older relatives (now in their 60s) did that back then, but it was more or less dead when I was old enough in the early 00s. By that time, budget airlines had become a thing, and summer/party trips to Spain / Mediterranean started to dominate my peers&amp;#39; summer vacations.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a debate regarding the current value of the pass, with some suggesting that local country-specific passes are often more cost-effective than the official Interrail version &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48890819&quot; title=&quot;For single countries though the Interrail not worth it, or more like make your own research For example in Hungary we have an unlimited pass for ~53€ a month, valid on all trains and multiple public transport options (almost everything in Budapest included) https://bkk.hu/en/tickets-and-passes/prices/hungary-pass-ful... Whereas a 3 days in 1 month Interrail pass is 79€ https://www.interrail.com/en/interrail-passes/one-country-pa...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48889823&quot; title=&quot;Is it Inter rail if it&amp;#39;s just in one country? Isn&amp;#39;t that just a normal rail pass then? :P&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussions also highlight a shift in expectations, ranging from nostalgic anecdotes of sleeping under the stars to modern warnings about the declining reliability of German rail services &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48892101&quot; title=&quot;Interrail used to be more popular years ago among young adults who had just finished high school. I did it with a few friends at the time, and it was an incredible experience of self-reliance, patience and just complete freedom. My best memory is sleeping under the stars outside the train station of Biarritz, France, on a mild summer night next to the Atlantic Ocean. Such a refreshing sleep. The next night we did the same, sleeping under the stars outside the train station of Modane, France,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48889958&quot; title=&quot;Prediction: Germany is going to be your worst train experience.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48890043&quot; title=&quot;Prediction: You haven&amp;#39;t trained a lot outside of Europe if you think the training experience in Germany would be &amp;#39;your worst train experience&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fabiensanglard.net/silpheed/index.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The art and engineering of Sega CD Silpheed&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (fabiensanglard.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48893639&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;255 points · 55 comments · by ibobev&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Sega CD game *Silpheed* achieved high-quality visuals by using custom video compression techniques, such as leveraging the system&amp;#39;s ASIC &amp;#34;font registers&amp;#34; for two-color tiles and optimizing tilemaps, rather than attempting to cram traditional full-motion video into the console&amp;#39;s limited bandwidth. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fabiensanglard.net/silpheed/index.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: The art and engineering of Sega CD Silpheed    URL Source: https://fabiensanglard.net/silpheed/index.html    Published Time: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 00:16:09 GMT    Markdown Content:  June 1, 2026    The art and engineering of Sega CD Silpheed    * * *    [![Image 1](https://fabiensanglard.net/silpheed/f384_cropped.png)](https://fabiensanglard.net/silpheed/f384_cropped.png)  The 90&amp;#39;s was a decade of considerable improvement in the world of video-game…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While readers praise the article&amp;#39;s technical depth, a sharp divide exists regarding the game&amp;#39;s quality: some label it &amp;#34;genuinely awful&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48894113&quot; title=&quot;Cool article, but Silpheed is a genuinely awful game. Just warning if you are tempted to play it after this lol&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, while others argue the gameplay was secondary to a groundbreaking, cinematic experience that pushed the Sega CD&amp;#39;s limited hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48894143&quot; title=&quot;The Sega CD is my favorite console and I was fortunate enough to have one growing up. Silpheed was unlike anything else. Unlike most FMV games, Silpheed actually felt like controlling a movie. During the first level when laser blasts are tearing through the fleet gigantic ships filling the screen with debris, I could barely believe what I was seeing. As the article points out, while it is an FMV game, it tries to fool you into thinking it’s a polygon based game. The Sega CD had no 3D…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48894471&quot; title=&quot;I mean, the gameplay isn&amp;#39;t amazing. But I wouldn&amp;#39;t call it awful. I&amp;#39;ve played games that are a lot worse... many of which are less fun while also being much less visually appealing. IIRC the sound design for silpheed is good too?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical discussion also focused on the console&amp;#39;s complex audio mixing and the specific role of the Mega Drive&amp;#39;s expansion port &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48896097&quot; title=&quot;I think the article is sorta wrong about the sound setup, the Mega Drive I does have a sound input on the expansion port, and mixes it into its sound output. Otherwise stuff like RF cables wouldn&amp;#39;t get Mega CD based audio (and you can do silly stuff like a Mega Drive II, which doesn&amp;#39;t have a headphone port, with a Mega CD I). I was going to say the patch cable setup was just a passive aid to take the Mega Drive I&amp;#39;s minijack stereo output (the big DIN AV connector on the rear only does mono) to…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48896670&quot; title=&quot;The soundtrack is absolutely phenomenal. I pull it up on Youtube once a year or so just for kicks. Silpheed by Sierra On-Line for the PC — ported from the Japanese PC-8801 — was similarly good, possibly the first game I played with a proper sound card. The MT-32 version blew my twelve-year-old mind.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant portion of the thread debates the author&amp;#39;s use of AI for reverse engineering, with some users expressing disappointment over the departure from manual craftsmanship &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48895597&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; That was a departure from how I normally work since I did not write a single line of code. I will likely write something about my A.I framework (and opensource it) next month. If the author is around, super curious how they got to enjoy their workflow here in a side project, working with AI. This kind of situation, to me, is often where the joy is gone.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48896561&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s tremendously disappointing to see Fabien stoop to using slop for his research; completely antithetical to the love for software craftsmanship I had inferred from his previous work.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, while the author defends the tool as a necessary efficiency for a time-constrained personal project &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48899716&quot; title=&quot;I am curious to understand why you are disappointed. I used A.I to write code on a personal project. It allowed me to go much faster than if I had tried by hand. Given my time constraints, it is likely I would have never found the time to complete this project. The article was entirely written by me without A.I. Please, help me to understand.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-07-12</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-07-12</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://systima.ai/blog/claude-code-vs-opencode-token-overhead&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Claude Code sends 33k tokens before reading the prompt; OpenCode sends 7k&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (systima.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48883275&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;535 points · 300 comments · by systima&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A comparative study found that Claude Code consumes significantly more tokens than OpenCode due to inefficient caching strategies and higher harness overhead, resulting in faster usage consumption during development tasks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://systima.ai/blog/claude-code-vs-opencode-token-overhead&quot; title=&quot;This started based off of a hunch. We usually use OpenCode, but were &amp;amp;#x27;forced&amp;amp;#x27; to use Claude Code for a while due to issues with Meridian. In that time, we saw the usage meter rise much, much more quickly than when using OpenCode.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;This was the initial anecdotal evidence, but we undertook this small study to collect empirical data:&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;We added logging between the agentic coding tool (Claude Code and OpenCode) and Anthropic&amp;amp;#x27;s endpoint, and captured all requests (and the returned…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users report that coding agents are becoming increasingly aggressive with token usage, often triggering dozens of tool calls or sub-agents for trivial tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48883796&quot; title=&quot;What really burns tokens is sub agents. I once gave Claude Code a pretty big task, and it immediately launched 7 sub agents which burned through my budget before even one of them was finished. Tried again 5 hours later: same result. If I let the main agent do the same task sequentially, it was no problem at all. I don&amp;#39;t know if it&amp;#39;s really just communication and orchestration that makes sub agents so inefficient, or if Anthropic figured that most people using sub agents pay per token on a big…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48883533&quot; title=&quot;This isn’t limited to large system prompts. Coding-agent harnesses are also becoming more aggressive about using tools, even for trivial requests. In our tests, prompts such as “Hey” or “commit” sometimes triggered 30+ tool calls: https://quesma.com/blog/the-true-cost-of-saying-hi-to-an-ai-... Tokenflation seems very real: the number of tokens consumed by simple tasks keeps increasing.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this &amp;#34;curiosity&amp;#34; is necessary for thorough codebase exploration &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48883949&quot; title=&quot;As a counterpoint: in a complex project, Fable&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;curiosity&amp;#39; may be exactly what you want for an exploration and planning stage - not just for the orchestrator that turns your prompt into different angles with which to explore, but for each subagent whose task is to search the codebase for one of those &amp;#39;angles.&amp;#39; If you truly want no stone unturned, letting those subagents spawn their own discoveries, and recursively grow the surface area of the inquiry, then it&amp;#39;s quite reasonable to want Fable…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others find it inefficient, noting that agents often waste context tracing logic instead of simply attempting to compile code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884357&quot; title=&quot;The curiosity is inefficient though. So many times I have to stop the agent and tell it to just fucking write the code and try compiling it.  Otherwise it will fill its entire context tracing through the program logic to derive from the code itself whether the thing it is about to do would work. It completely fails to notice it can just… try.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. A central debate persists regarding incentives: some believe Anthropic maximizes tokens to drive revenue and higher subscription tiers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48883663&quot; title=&quot;My opinion is that claude code uses more tokens simply because Anthropic makes more money that way and forces people into their subscriptions. This is supported by the fact that they won&amp;#39;t let you use your sub on a different coding agent. I use pi btw.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884034&quot; title=&quot;Once I realized that Anthropic is a token merchant, I start to understand Anthropic’s decision more. They are always finding reasons for you to use more tokens through them unless the users revolt or demand some guardrails.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48883818&quot; title=&quot;Nope, that’s not true, because they want you to pay for the higher subscription bracket.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, while others argue a fixed-fee model should theoretically incentivize efficiency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48883798&quot; title=&quot;You&amp;#39;re making the opposite argument. Anthropic is incentivized to use less tokens in Claude Code because people are paying a fixed monthly fee for subscriptions.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.npr.org/2026/06/30/nx-s1-5835631/turner-camhi-do-no-harm-college-loans&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Under federal rule, colleges must leave grads better off or lose financial aid&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (npr.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48878126&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;190 points · &lt;strong&gt;490 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by nradov&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The U.S. Department of Education is implementing a new rule that will revoke federal financial aid for college programs whose graduates fail to earn more than workers with only a high school diploma or, for graduate programs, a bachelor&amp;#39;s degree. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.npr.org/2026/06/30/nx-s1-5835631/turner-camhi-do-no-harm-college-loans&quot; title=&quot;Title: Under a new federal rule, colleges must leave grads better off or lose financial aid    URL Source: https://www.npr.org/2026/06/30/nx-s1-5835631/turner-camhi-do-no-harm-college-loans    Published Time: 2026-07-06T16:40:30-04:00    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: This illustration shows people in various styles of clothing running across a finish…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters debate whether higher education should be viewed as a financial investment or a pursuit of knowledge, with many arguing that while degrees may serve intellectual purposes, taxpayer-funded loans must be tied to future earnings to protect students and the public &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48879562&quot; title=&quot;The purpose of a college degree is NOT a job... but the purpose of a college LOAN is 100% a job, and it&amp;#39;s very important to differentiate between the two. The whole point of the loan is to buy time; you don&amp;#39;t want to wait for when you have savings to purchase the degree, you want to do it now . If you are not doing it for the job, then why the loan, what&amp;#39;s the rush? If knowledge and prestige is all that matters, then don&amp;#39;t take the loan, take the scenic route, get your degree slowly as and when…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48878593&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; But this new test, known as &amp;#39;do no harm,&amp;#39; raises some thorny questions about the purpose of college. Like: Is it just about making more money? If this is a fair question to ask students, then it is a fair question to ask the schools as well. They are the ones charging enormous amounts of money to students for this. This doesn’t prevent people from learning to paint or play the clarinet. It prevents students from taking out enormous loans for it.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48879930&quot; title=&quot;Very sensible take.  If you want to study Latin American gender roles and it’s your own money, and a college can break even on its cost to teach you that, you should be able to.  When it’s someone else’s money, the outcome changes.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics of this &amp;#34;gainful employment&amp;#34; metric argue it reduces education to a mere credentialing system for higher salaries and risks devaluing the arts and culture &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48878563&quot; title=&quot;imo this is pants on head backwards. The whole problem with the current university system is that it has become exclusively a credentialing system that everyone uses to justify higher salaries. We’ve completely left the education part of it by the wayside…except for the liberal arts majors who are actually there just to learn! This rule is just encoding the existing tulip mania into federal law directly, by making it clear that the ONLY reason one goes to school is for future $$$&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880368&quot; title=&quot;This is such a shitty American take (or any of the countries that somehow decide the USA is a good model to follow), it&amp;#39;s kind of baffling that this is a popular opinion and explains a lot of the social issues (or near lack of social system) you guys have. You know that technically, people are allowed to have fun and not strive to be a billionaire, right? Its everyones right to pick a path they want, and enjoy, and if they end up providing a service with it, or just contributing to art or…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant discussion regarding why student debt is not dischargeable through bankruptcy; some suggest this policy is necessary to keep interest rates low and loans accessible to those without assets, while others propose that universities should co-sign loans to share the financial risk &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48878341&quot; title=&quot;I feel like I have not really heard a compelling reason why student debt should not be dischargeable thru bankruptcy like (afaik) all other forms of debt. I am curious what the ramifications would be if higher education institutions had to (in some form) co-sign the debt being issued. I do get that not all education should be purely for economic reasons, but as an autodidact I feel that &amp;#39;learning for the sake of learning&amp;#39; does not need to come with the prices that people are paying for degrees.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48878395&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I feel like I have not really heard a compelling reason why student debt should not be dischargeable thru bankruptcy like (afaik) all other forms of debt. According to Reddit [1] it was to discourage students from immediately declaring bankruptcy upon graduation. I don&amp;#39;t see why they couldn&amp;#39;t have put a time limit on it though, if that was the reason. Say you can&amp;#39;t declare bankruptcy for 7 years after you leave school. [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/StudentLoans/comments/ufejjg/why_ca...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48879129&quot; title=&quot;The full reason is that preventing bankruptcy is the only way to keep interest rates low and make the loans widely available. If bankruptcy was allowed then the obvious play would be to take the loan, max out credit cards right before graduation, then declare bankruptcy before you get your first job. Lenders would respond by increasing interest rates dramatically and restricting loans to those who had assets. This would basically turn into loans being for people with wealthy parents or having…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://geohot.github.io//blog/jekyll/update/2026/07/12/i-love-llms.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I love LLMs, I hate hype&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (geohot.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48883343&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;389 points · 245 comments · by therepanic&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;George Hotz expresses enthusiasm for the practical utility of AI and LLMs while criticizing the industry&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;negative valence hype,&amp;#34; doomerism, and anti-open-source arguments used to justify inflated valuations for frontier labs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://geohot.github.io//blog/jekyll/update/2026/07/12/i-love-llms.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: I love LLMs, I hate hype    URL Source: https://geohot.github.io/blog/jekyll/update/2026/07/12/i-love-llms.html    Published Time: 2026-07-12T00:00:00-07:00    Markdown Content:  I think from this blog you may misunderestimate how absolutely giddy I am about AI. I did hacking from 2007-2014, after that my [whole](https://comma.ai/)[career](https://tinygrad.org/) has been devoted to AI. I love the progress. I’m so excited for the [new LLMs](https://openai.com/index/gpt-5-6/), [self driving…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary debate centers on whether frontier AI labs can capture enough value to justify their massive valuations, with some arguing that models are becoming commodities and users will resist shifting from flat subscriptions to expensive usage-based billing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884473&quot; title=&quot;This line: &amp;#39;this is my main argument against the valuation of frontier labs. It’s not that AI won’t create that much value, it’s that they won’t capture it.&amp;#39; That is a very astute and concise way to explain everything about how the frontier labs are behaving and how they&amp;#39;re trying to push more people to pay token rates for the best models. At the current subscription prices ($100 or $200 a month for a generous, though bounded, amount of tokens), frontier models are a no-brainer, most folks and…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884660&quot; title=&quot;Frontier labs will figure out all sorts of ways to wiggle into the value chain beyond being commodities.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users worry that current models are heavily subsidized and prices will eventually spike &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884091&quot; title=&quot;I love LLMs too, but I am concerned about their cost. They are all still very subsidised. Is there any guarantee that I&amp;#39;ll be able to run a Opus 4.8-level model on my personal computer before the big AI labs decide to hike up the prices?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others believe inference costs will continue to crash as hardware improves and local execution becomes viable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885295&quot; title=&quot;In 5-10 years an Apple Watch will run a Fable level model locally. I don’t think we (hackers) should worry too much about token cost inflation. The current wave of providers, that’s another story.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884227&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; They are all still very subsidised. I think the opposite: I think the frontier labs have good margins on their inference unit costs. We can already see what it costs to run near frontier-size models. There are independent business pivoting to serving these models at reasonable prices and they&amp;#39;re competing on OpenRouter for costs much lower than frontier labs. &amp;gt; Is there any guarantee that I&amp;#39;ll be able to run a Opus 4.8-level model on my personal computer before the big AI labs decide to hike…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. This shift toward local, AI-assisted development allows individuals to easily fork and customize software, though critics warn this could lead to &amp;#34;maintenance hell&amp;#34; and a decline in upstream contributions to the open-source community &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48883823&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; where’s all this new magical software that the productivity improvements should imply? It&amp;#39;s running, privately, in my homelab. I think we are entering what I call the &amp;#39;have it your way&amp;#39; era. If an open source project doesn&amp;#39;t do exactly what you want it to do, fork it, or create a new version. It&amp;#39;s too easy. This makes me a bit concerned about the future of open source. Upstreaming used to be worth it, since maintaining a fork is effort too. But now the balance has shifted significantly.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884160&quot; title=&quot;You will likely end up in maintenance hell soon. This will likely not be much easier with AI because coding is not the hard/annoying part, it&amp;#39;s the fact that you need to dust off every little project every time a tiny fix is needed, and that&amp;#39;s a lot of toil in the long run.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://gist.github.com/cereblab/dc9a40bc26120f4540e4e09b75ffb547&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What xAI&amp;#39;s Grok build CLI sends to xAI: A wire-level analysis&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (gist.github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877371&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;443 points · 167 comments · by jhoho&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A wire-level analysis of xAI’s Grok Build CLI reveals that the tool automatically uploads entire repositories—including git history, unread files, and unredacted secrets like `.env` files—to a Google Cloud Storage bucket, even when &amp;#34;Improve the model&amp;#34; settings are disabled. &lt;a href=&quot;https://gist.github.com/cereblab/dc9a40bc26120f4540e4e09b75ffb547&quot; title=&quot;Title: What xAI Grok Build CLI actually sends to xAI - a wire-level analysis (grok 0.2.93)    URL Source: https://gist.github.com/cereblab/dc9a40bc26120f4540e4e09b75ffb547    Markdown Content:  What xAI Grok Build CLI actually sends to xAI - a wire-level analysis (grok 0.2.93)    _By [@cereblab](https://x.com/cereblab) — Independent AI Safety Checker. Reproduce it yourself: [github.com/cereblab/grok-build-exfil-repro](https://github.com/cereblab/grok-build-exfil-repro)_    _A measured, reproducible…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The xAI Grok CLI has sparked significant privacy concerns by uploading entire repositories, including full git histories, regardless of what the agent actually reads &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877828&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;It uploads the whole repository — every tracked file&amp;#39;s content plus git history — independent of what the agent reads&amp;#39; Holy cow!!!! I mean I kinda expected Elon would do something like this to try to catch-up.. but this is extremely concerning. This is precisely the reason, even though their pricing is competitive and grok-4.5 is actually good enough, I chose not to go with them.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some speculate this allows the model to inspect codebases during &amp;#34;thinking&amp;#34; phases without client-side tool calls &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877833&quot; title=&quot;One reason to want to upload the entire codebase is that it allows them to have the model inspect the codebase during &amp;#39;thinking&amp;#39; without going back to the client to do real tool calls. It&amp;#39;s not a really great reason, because what&amp;#39;s the downside of going back to the client? But that&amp;#39;s the best reason I can think of.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue this behavior justifies the use of sandboxing tools to restrict directory and network access &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48878024&quot; title=&quot;I always separate the coding tools from LLM providers, and use bubblewrap to sandbox the coding tools so they: 1. Can only read the working project directory, with .git read-only and sensitive directories hidden (mounted as empty directories). 2. Have an isolated network namespace; they can only access the internet through an HTTP proxy hosted on a Unix socket, can only access specific LLM provider hostnames, and exclude the tool&amp;#39;s own hostname. For example, with Crush, I will let it access…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48878016&quot; title=&quot;There is a reason I run all such CLIs inside a sandbox [1] giving limited directory access. Imagine if the CLI pulled your SSH keys or other sensitive information by mistake? Programmers do make such mistakes all the time.  I don&amp;#39;t want to count on whether &amp;#39;uploading all files it can access&amp;#39; is intentional or a mistake. 1 - https://github.com/ashishb/amazing-sandbox&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. In contrast to xAI&amp;#39;s approach, a GitHub engineer clarified that even Microsoft and OpenAI lack broad access to private GitHub repositories due to multiple layers of audited internal guardrails &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48878156&quot; title=&quot;GitHub Copilot engineer here working on identity, safety, and privacy - no, even Microsoft doesn’t have access to all GitHub repos. As years have passed since the acquisition “company” delineations have blurred a bit, but Microsoft employees still need to go through a separate onboarding process to access any GitHub company resources (internal repositories, telemetry, documentation, etc.), and then we have an additional layer of entitlements to gate and audit access to any sensitive data,…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877894&quot; title=&quot;It would be _extremely_ surprising if private repos were available via that contract. Corporations wouldn&amp;#39;t use GitHub at all if anyone other than those given direct access had read/copy permission.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48878417&quot; title=&quot;Access meaning read, modify, delete, etc. Pretty standard definition, unless you know of a different meaning of access I’m not privy to. Microsoft can certainly request that we perform actions against repositories, as can governments, customers, random people on the street, etc. Whether action is taken in those cases is a question for lawyers to fight over, but we have the engineering guardrails in place to require it to be an intentional, audited action. I appreciate the spicy question tho,…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://scrapfly.dev/posts/browser-math-os-fingerprint/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Since Chromium 148, Math.tanh is now fingerprintable to link underlying OS&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (scrapfly.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884853&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;387 points · 183 comments · by joahnn_s&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since Chrome 148, `Math.tanh` and CSS trig functions use the host operating system&amp;#39;s math libraries instead of a bundled routine, allowing anti-bot systems to fingerprint users by detecting subtle, OS-specific bit differences in mathematical calculations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://scrapfly.dev/posts/browser-math-os-fingerprint/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Your Browser Does Math Differently on Every OS, and Anti-Bot Systems Read the Bits    URL Source: https://scrapfly.dev/posts/browser-math-os-fingerprint/    Published Time: 2026-07-12    Markdown Content:  Fingerprinting is usually about canvas, WebGL, fonts, audio. There is a quieter signal, and it lives in the last bits of a number.    Run this in any console:    ```  Math.tanh(0.8)  // 0.6640367702678491   genuine Linux Chrome    (glibc)  // 0.664036770267849    genuine macOS Chrome    …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discovery that `Math.tanh` in Chromium can reveal a user&amp;#39;s underlying OS highlights a significant fingerprinting vector, particularly for bots attempting to bypass detection by spoofing User-Agent headers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885018&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; One tanh call on the right input is a per-OS signature. Claim macOS, return Linux math bits, and you have contradicted your own User-Agent. They (or rather the LLM that wrote this) missed that this is possibly fingerprintable to browser version range, which is slightly more interesting. Most users aren&amp;#39;t spoofing their user agent headers to be a different operating system. Most fingerprinting solutions aren&amp;#39;t trying to infer your operating system, they only care about semi-unique things that…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885055&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Most users aren&amp;#39;t spoofing their user agent headers to be a different operating system. The people behind the LLM behind this blog post are. They&amp;#39;re trying to pretend their robots are people to sell other websites&amp;#39; data to their customer. It&amp;#39;s easier to pass bot detection gates if you pretend to be a physical machine running Windows or macOS than if you honestly admit you&amp;#39;re using Linux on a VM.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users suggest that correctly rounded transcendental functions or fixed-point math could mitigate these inconsistencies, others express frustration with the &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; of LLM-generated write-ups and the ethics of large-scale data scraping &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885018&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; One tanh call on the right input is a per-OS signature. Claim macOS, return Linux math bits, and you have contradicted your own User-Agent. They (or rather the LLM that wrote this) missed that this is possibly fingerprintable to browser version range, which is slightly more interesting. Most users aren&amp;#39;t spoofing their user agent headers to be a different operating system. Most fingerprinting solutions aren&amp;#39;t trying to infer your operating system, they only care about semi-unique things that…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884945&quot; title=&quot;I guess that&amp;#39;s one more good reason to push for correctly rounded transcendental functions. I recently learned that they&amp;#39;re basically solved now. [1] [1] https://arith2026.org/program.html (2nd keynote)&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885541&quot; title=&quot;I haven&amp;#39;t been active on HN as much in the last few months. The community seems really fixated on calling content slop and detecting LLM usage in a paranoid way.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885327&quot; title=&quot;I never understood why fixed precision, and integer math isn&amp;#39;t more popular. In engineering, we used fixed point all the time, it ran on much simpler hardware and  the error is mathematically easy to model. IEEE 754 floats are not only suspect when it comes to theory, but are often outperformed with integers smaller than the mantissa (so less than 24 bits of int can beat a 32 bit float), when it comes to things like loss of precision.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The conversation also touches on potential legal deterrents for fingerprinting and the ongoing arms race between bot operators and site security &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885055&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Most users aren&amp;#39;t spoofing their user agent headers to be a different operating system. The people behind the LLM behind this blog post are. They&amp;#39;re trying to pretend their robots are people to sell other websites&amp;#39; data to their customer. It&amp;#39;s easier to pass bot detection gates if you pretend to be a physical machine running Windows or macOS than if you honestly admit you&amp;#39;re using Linux on a VM.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885454&quot; title=&quot;It is when you&amp;#39;re doing it like the LLM companies are: at scale, to the degree that you&amp;#39;re taking down my site, without my consent by masking your user-agent, for the purpose of stealing data I didn&amp;#39;t authorize you to have.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885059&quot; title=&quot;Can&amp;#39;t we make fingerprinting illegal, as in, jailtime illegal? Would not solve everything but still help a lot.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2026/07/11/old-and-new-apps-via-modern-coding-agents/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Old and new apps, via modern coding agents&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (terrytao.wordpress.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880170&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;425 points · 126 comments · by subset&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mathematician Terence Tao successfully used AI coding agents to port his legacy Java math applets to modern JavaScript and develop new visualization tools for special relativity and Gilbreath’s conjecture, finding the process significantly more efficient than manual programming despite minor AI-generated bugs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2026/07/11/old-and-new-apps-via-modern-coding-agents/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Old and new apps, via modern coding agents    URL Source: https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2026/07/11/old-and-new-apps-via-modern-coding-agents/    Published Time: 2026-07-11T22:48:30+00:00    Markdown Content:  [![Image 4](https://terrytao.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/cropped-covid-19-curves-graphic-social-v3.gif)](https://terrytao.wordpress.com/ &amp;#39;Return to front page&amp;#39;)    [What&amp;#39;s new](https://terrytao.wordpress.com/ &amp;#39;Return to front page&amp;#39;)  Updates on my research and expository papers,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The use of coding agents by high-level experts like Terence Tao highlights a shift where LLMs act as a &amp;#34;great equalizer,&amp;#34; allowing non-programmers and domain experts to bypass &amp;#34;boring&amp;#34; coding tasks like visualizations and dashboards &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880430&quot; title=&quot;Terry Tao using coding agents to build apps means we&amp;#39;re one step away from a Fields Medalist asking an LLM why his Docker container won&amp;#39;t start, just like the rest of us.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880614&quot; title=&quot;When it comes to coding, non-programmers do not have to be in a defensive position worried that their job is under risk, instead they just see a great tool that saves them time, especially doing boring coding like dashboards, visualizations, interactive web-pages, or doing experiments that they otherwise would not have time for.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881193&quot; title=&quot;Building visualizations with LLMs has been a major boost for my CS classes: https://htmx.org/essays/universities-and-ai/#demos-visualiza... Many visualizations that I have always wanted but just didn&amp;#39;t have the time to build, I now have. To give an example, I wanted a simplified 8-bit computer to complement the 16-bit teaching computer I use and designed this in a few days with the help of claude: https://bdp.cs.montana.edu/&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see this as a revolutionary boost to productivity and software supply, others argue that the output is often &amp;#34;close to useless&amp;#34; or limited to non-critical hobby projects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882390&quot; title=&quot;The humbling thought should be all the blue collar workers on r/vibecoding demoing their apps and games. And then realizing they put together something that would have taken you a few days to do. The supply of software is about to go way up, and that&amp;#39;s going to massively impact demand unless every firm on earth is clamoring for more. We&amp;#39;re going to see if Jevons paradox holds true, or if wages get impacted drastically.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880879&quot; title=&quot;I always enjoy these &amp;#39;domain expert has fun using AI to do something in their domain&amp;#39; articles. But it&amp;#39;s always a hobby project, never something serious.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48883180&quot; title=&quot;The supply of software has already gone up, and most of the new stuff is close to useless&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. This trend has sparked debate over whether the surge in AI-generated software will trigger Jevons paradox or lead to a drastic reduction in developer wages &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882390&quot; title=&quot;The humbling thought should be all the blue collar workers on r/vibecoding demoing their apps and games. And then realizing they put together something that would have taken you a few days to do. The supply of software is about to go way up, and that&amp;#39;s going to massively impact demand unless every firm on earth is clamoring for more. We&amp;#39;re going to see if Jevons paradox holds true, or if wages get impacted drastically.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theregister.com/on-prem/2026/07/11/irish-datacenters-now-guzzle-23-of-the-countrys-electricity/5270013&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Irish datacenters now guzzle 23% of the country&amp;#39;s electricity&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theregister.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884322&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;227 points · 233 comments · by Bender&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Data centers in Ireland consumed 23% of the country&amp;#39;s metered electricity in 2025, a 10% increase from the previous year. Despite a moratorium on new grid connections in Dublin, server farms now use more power than all urban households combined. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theregister.com/on-prem/2026/07/11/irish-datacenters-now-guzzle-23-of-the-countrys-electricity/5270013&quot; title=&quot;Title: Irish datacenters now guzzle 23% of the country&amp;#39;s electricity    URL Source: https://www.theregister.com/on-prem/2026/07/11/irish-datacenters-now-guzzle-23-of-the-countrys-electricity/5270013    Published Time: 2026-07-11T10:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  [Jump to main content](https://www.theregister.com/on-prem/2026/07/11/irish-datacenters-now-guzzle-23-of-the-countrys-electricity/5270013#main)    Search     TOPICS    *   Security      *   [All Security](https://www.theregister.com/security)      *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the linguistic framing of the report, with debate over whether the word &amp;#34;guzzle&amp;#34; constitutes manipulative propaganda or a valid editorial stance in journalism &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884475&quot; title=&quot;They chose to add the word &amp;#39;guzzle&amp;#39;. They could have just written &amp;#39;Irish datacenters now use 23% of the country&amp;#39;s electricity&amp;#39;. But they made the editorial decision to add in &amp;#39;guzzle&amp;#39;. What&amp;#39;s the word for this type of propaganda, where they add in some sort of adjective that wasn&amp;#39;t needed, in order to prime the reader on how to think/feel, rather than just objectively reporting the facts? What are the odds that the content of the article is objective and factual, given the decisions they made…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884652&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; What&amp;#39;s the word for this type of propaganda, where they add in some sort of adjective that wasn&amp;#39;t needed, in order to prime the reader on how to think/feel, rather than just objectively reporting the facts? It&amp;#39;s called an editorial. It&amp;#39;s not supposed to be a mere report, concerned with respecting any random person&amp;#39;s feeling about how all electricity consumption is equally valid and should be equally respected.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884657&quot; title=&quot;Journalism is allowed to have an opinion, that doesn&amp;#39;t make it propaganda.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that data centers represent productive economic activity that necessitates expanded energy capacity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885893&quot; title=&quot;Just to be contrarian: what we&amp;#39;re talking about is &amp;#39;electricity use from economic activity&amp;#39;. This should be good for Ireland but they&amp;#39;ll need to build energy capacity to keep up. It&amp;#39;s misplaced to be angry about datacenters themselves. There IS value being created, or people wouldn&amp;#39;t use the tools. Construction creates jobs, manufacturing the machines in the buildings is a huge global industry; the value people gain in their work and play is considered worthwhile by them individually. In the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others highlight the strain on local residents who face high electricity costs—up to 34 cents per kWh—and restrictions on traditional heating methods &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885269&quot; title=&quot;My electricity costs 34 cent per Kw/h and I can’t afford solar panels or a renovation to air to water heating while the government insists we shouldn’t use oil / coal anymore nor logs or turf to heat our homes edit: I live in Ireland&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885382&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s 7x the cost that I pay in the Pacific NW.  Where are you?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. A core criticism is that the current economic model fails to account for externalities, leading to a disconnect where those reaping the benefits of these facilities are not the ones bearing the societal consequences &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885449&quot; title=&quot;Isn&amp;#39;t this a similar issue of doctors raised by taxpayers money doing hair transplant and cosmetic surgeries instead of working in much less profitable hospitals with sick people or European scientists and engineers risen by public education working in American tech companies or super rich people from all over the world buying all the homes in London which is valuable not because of its resources but because of the people there and now causing housing problems? They all have the same issues: 1)…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://scotto.me/blog/2026-07-12-how-to-read-more-books/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How to read more books&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (scotto.me)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882056&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;289 points · 162 comments · by silcoon&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To increase reading volume, the author recommends replacing smartphone use with a constant reading habit, utilizing e-readers for portability, and setting goals while remaining willing to quit unengaging books. The guide emphasizes avoiding &amp;#34;hacks&amp;#34; like speed reading or audiobooks in favor of focused, traditional reading. &lt;a href=&quot;https://scotto.me/blog/2026-07-12-how-to-read-more-books/&quot; title=&quot;Title: How to read more books    URL Source: https://scotto.me/blog/2026-07-12-how-to-read-more-books/    Published Time: 2026-07-12T00:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  I’ve read roughly a book a week for a few years, and I can tell you it’s doable. I didn’t always read this much. When I started, I read fewer than ten volumes per year, but making it a goal made me switch gears and achieve what I once thought was impossible. I want to explain to you here what I did to become a prolific reader, and what…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To increase reading volume, many users advocate for replacing &amp;#34;empty calorie&amp;#34; podcasts with audiobooks, noting that the structured nature of books offers a higher quality-per-hour of content &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882596&quot; title=&quot;I have an almost-four year old child and not a lot of downtime. I used to listen to podcasts when I was doing dishes, cleaning the house, walking the dog, etc. I&amp;#39;ve mostly abandoned podcasts in favor of audiobooks. It didn&amp;#39;t feel like they were benefiting me in any meaningful way—almost like they were just empty calories for my ears. I finally made it all the way through The Power Broker recently, which I&amp;#39;ve wanted to read for years, and am now on Jennifer Pahlka&amp;#39;s really insightful Recoding…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882831&quot; title=&quot;There is also another benefit to books, on average they are much better than a random 3 hour podcast.   If you care about what you read, you&amp;#39;d be getting something that the author has spend a lot of time, skill and energy to write, the editor would have spend a lot of time and skill to improve with the author. I have a measure for all content I consume, quality/hr of reading/listening. If it&amp;#39;s just a long video that has 2-3 questions that has caught my attention I&amp;#39;d be listening only those. If…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882867&quot; title=&quot;I gave up on podcasts because of the excessive insertion of commercials, and the execrable user interface of the iphone podcast app.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that audiobooks are a fundamentally different medium that lacks the depth of physical reading &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882984&quot; title=&quot;Audiobooks are just a different medium. I don&amp;#39;t think people should pretend that an audiobook is a book. You process the two in completely different ways. This doesn&amp;#39;t imply one is better than the other either. For me I don&amp;#39;t like audiobooks because its very slow and spoken stories should have a different cadence, velocity, set of dynamics, and diction than a book should (check out &amp;#39;the moth&amp;#39; to see what I&amp;#39;m talking about). I hold nothing against people who don&amp;#39;t like to read or people who like…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend they are a functional equivalent for non-fiction and a vital tool for those with limited downtime &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882596&quot; title=&quot;I have an almost-four year old child and not a lot of downtime. I used to listen to podcasts when I was doing dishes, cleaning the house, walking the dog, etc. I&amp;#39;ve mostly abandoned podcasts in favor of audiobooks. It didn&amp;#39;t feel like they were benefiting me in any meaningful way—almost like they were just empty calories for my ears. I finally made it all the way through The Power Broker recently, which I&amp;#39;ve wanted to read for years, and am now on Jennifer Pahlka&amp;#39;s really insightful Recoding…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884027&quot; title=&quot;I agree that it’s a pretty different experience for fiction, where the subjective experience is everything and the narrator can color your experience a lot. For nonfiction, I think the two mediums are virtually the same depending on the density of the book. Most differences come down to the fact that you’re more susceptible to distraction. Most nonfiction books are light and repetitive enough that I don’t think it’s a big deal&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885190&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;I don&amp;#39;t think people should pretend that an audiobook is a book. You process the two in completely different ways. Is this attitude a holdover from encouraging small children to read for themselves?  I don&amp;#39;t know if this is quite the right framing but are you... hearing-illterate to some degree? Some voice actors definitely add a layer of interpretation, and some are distractingly bad, but otherwise it could not be any more of an equal experience absorbing a book through my eyes or my ears. …&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond format, commenters emphasize that reading more requires a &amp;#34;lobotomized&amp;#34; digital life, involving the aggressive removal of social media and streaming apps to eliminate distractions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882474&quot; title=&quot;Love this blog, appreciate the author. &amp;gt; This is probably the most difficult part. I had to remove all social media and streaming apps from my iPhone. I removed Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, etc. When I started, I found myself picking up the phone and immediately noticing that something was missing, since the only things left to do were check the weather, read boring emails, or see my bank account. These past few months, I have more resolve than ever to cut the chains. Willpower is a practice,…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882542&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; First of all, you don’t have to make time to read. What you need to do is read every single time you are not doing something else. Mmh I’m not sure about that. I prefer to read for 1-2 hours rather than read 2 minutes here and 5 minutes there, especially for books that require some concentration to read, like dense stories and/or books not in my native language.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.economist.com/leaders/2026/07/09/a-no-brainer-for-protecting-your-brain&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The shingles vaccine may reduce the risk of dementia&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (economist.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881874&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;231 points · 191 comments · by saikatsg&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A new study suggests that Shingrix, the modern shingles vaccine, may delay the onset of dementia by an average of 164 days compared to older vaccines, offering a potential low-cost tool for cognitive protection. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.economist.com/leaders/2026/07/09/a-no-brainer-for-protecting-your-brain&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;PzPop&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;PzPop&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Research suggests a strong association between the shingles vaccine and a significant reduction in dementia risk, with some studies showing a 20% lower probability of diagnosis &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882482&quot; title=&quot;Replicated association, which is strong, but not proof. Initial study saw a 3.5% absolute reduction in dementia diagnoses over seven years with a very wide confidence interval. In Australia the study was replicated with 1.8% absolute reduction over 7.4 yrs. Canadian replication: 2% over 5.5 yrs. Infections generally increase the risk of future dementia. Like the more colds you have throughout life.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882352&quot; title=&quot;TL;DR Shingles vaccines reduces chances of dementia by 20%. Yet, most countries health systems only look at the upfront cost of ~$300 and don’t recommend for all who could benefit.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885270&quot; title=&quot;If you haven&amp;#39;t seen the chart from the UK study, I highly recommend checking it out: https://erictopol.substack.com/p/the-shingles-vaccine-and-re... When the vaccine came out in the UK, they included a hard age cutoff: Above a certain age, you weren&amp;#39;t eligible. Below that age, you were eligible. They looked at the probability of a dementia diagnosis over the 7 years after the vaccine was introduced. People who were born in the &amp;#39;can get the vaccine&amp;#39; group have markedly lower rates of dementia.…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users are eager to pay out of pocket to receive the vaccine before the standard age of 50, others report that doctors may advise waiting due to concerns about waning protection or potential side effects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882366&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m in my 40s with genetic predisposition for Alzheimer&amp;#39;s. Been seriously considering the past year or two paying out of pocket for Shingrix. I think it would be ~$500 total for two doses. Sure, I could wait 7 or 8 years until I qualify via insurance, but is that really worth the risk for what is an easily absorbed cost to me? Especially when I have a friend in her late 30s who just went through a very rough bout of shingles? It makes sense to have targets like age 50 for population-wide public…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882593&quot; title=&quot;Wait, you can just pay for the shingles vaccine, before you&amp;#39;re 50? Where do I do that? I had shingles in my 30s. It was the sickest I&amp;#39;ve ever been.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882558&quot; title=&quot;Shingles terrifies me because it can cause hearing loss. I spoke to my GP and he wouldn&amp;#39;t give me a script for it even though I&amp;#39;m 3 years away from qualifying. He mentioned side effects.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882567&quot; title=&quot;I read before that iirc because of waning protection it’s better not to get it too early. It’s not clear to me why you can’t get it twice, but what I read (and it was some online discussion so could be wrong) was that someone had been specifically told by their doctor to wait to 50 as the best spot to get it. I’d like to know more, I’m in my 40s and would be happy to get it now too but not if it was going to be worse overall for some reason.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a broader consensus that infections in general may increase dementia risk, though some debate remains regarding the exact causal mechanisms and the long-term cost-effectiveness of public health policies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882482&quot; title=&quot;Replicated association, which is strong, but not proof. Initial study saw a 3.5% absolute reduction in dementia diagnoses over seven years with a very wide confidence interval. In Australia the study was replicated with 1.8% absolute reduction over 7.4 yrs. Canadian replication: 2% over 5.5 yrs. Infections generally increase the risk of future dementia. Like the more colds you have throughout life.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882352&quot; title=&quot;TL;DR Shingles vaccines reduces chances of dementia by 20%. Yet, most countries health systems only look at the upfront cost of ~$300 and don’t recommend for all who could benefit.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882917&quot; title=&quot;That seems like being penny wise and pound foolish.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882779&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; like the more colds you have in life Whoa wait what? This is the first time I’ve heard of this - is this actually common knowledge?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://english.elpais.com/international/2026-07-10/woman-rescued-in-brazil-after-being-enslaved-for-55-years-by-three-generations-of-the-same-family.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Woman in Brazil enslaved for 55 years by 3 generations of the same family&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (english.elpais.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880209&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;150 points · &lt;strong&gt;211 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by RetroTechie&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A 62-year-old domestic worker in Brazil was rescued after being enslaved for 55 years by three generations of a family who denied her wages, education, and freedom. The employers have agreed to provide her with a furnished apartment and financial compensation following an investigation by labor prosecutors. &lt;a href=&quot;https://english.elpais.com/international/2026-07-10/woman-rescued-in-brazil-after-being-enslaved-for-55-years-by-three-generations-of-the-same-family.html&quot; title=&quot;Woman rescued in Brazil after being enslaved for 55 years by three generations of the same family    The domestic worker, who entered the household at the age of seven and never received wages or vacations, is set to be compensated by her employers    [Skip to content](#main-content)    \_    \_    \_    \_    Select:    * - - -  * [España](https://elpais.com)  * [América](https://elpais.com/america/)    + [México](https://elpais.com/mexico/)    + [Colombia](https://elpais.com/america-colombia/)    +…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights that &amp;#34;informal&amp;#34; slavery in Brazil is often disguised as domestic help, where poor girls are integrated into families as unpaid servants under the guise of being &amp;#34;part of the family&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880469&quot; title=&quot;Its a common occurrence for families to take in poor girls to do house work in exchange for food and lodging. And with the insidious nature of Brazilian racism, they will pretend that she is part of the family. They might even take her on vacations (to work, of course). If you grow up with this mentality it might even be hard for you to see the injustice. Brazil abolished slavery in 1888, the last country in the Americas to do so, decades after its neighbours. The slaves never got compensation…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters express outrage that the victim in this case remains with her employers despite the abuse, noting that Brazil’s history as the last country in the Americas to abolish slavery still influences its modern social architecture and high levels of inequality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880469&quot; title=&quot;Its a common occurrence for families to take in poor girls to do house work in exchange for food and lodging. And with the insidious nature of Brazilian racism, they will pretend that she is part of the family. They might even take her on vacations (to work, of course). If you grow up with this mentality it might even be hard for you to see the injustice. Brazil abolished slavery in 1888, the last country in the Americas to do so, decades after its neighbours. The slaves never got compensation…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880354&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Although the family has agreed to compensate her, Maria, who lived in near-total isolation and without contact with her relatives, will remain with her employers What the fuck? Why did the law need the family&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;agreement&amp;#39;?? Why is nobody going to jail for imprisoning someone for 55 years??&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880769&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a symptom of inequality. It will start happening more and more even in the first world if inequality isn&amp;#39;t tackled and wealth continues to concentrate.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate whether the primary driver is inequality or poverty, others point out that forced labor persists globally through legal loopholes, such as the US prison system &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880662&quot; title=&quot;Correction: The US still has not abolished slavery. It is still legal in the case of prisoners: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirteenth_Amendment_to_the_Un...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880848&quot; title=&quot;Why do you see inequality as the problem, instead of poverty?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880775&quot; title=&quot;yes!  which is _the_ driving factor behind the US prison system with its private prison labor facilities. there is zero financial motivation for the state for prevention or rehab or any other activities to reduce imprisonment rates did I mention disenfranchisement of the imprisoned?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dakra.github.io/ghostel/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ghostel.el: Terminal emulator powered by libghostty&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (dakra.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48879504&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;272 points · 54 comments · by signa11&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ghostel is a modern Emacs terminal emulator powered by the Ghostty VT engine, offering high-performance rendering, Kitty graphics/keyboard protocol support, and seamless shell integration. It features five input modes, automatic binary installation, and advanced capabilities like OSC 8 hyperlinks and whitelisted Elisp execution from the shell. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dakra.github.io/ghostel/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Terminal emulator powered by libghostty    URL Source: https://dakra.github.io/ghostel/    Published Time: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 14:04:49 GMT    Markdown Content:  ## Table of Contents    *   [1. Quick Start](https://dakra.github.io/ghostel/#quick-start)      *   [1.1. Shell integration at a glance](https://dakra.github.io/ghostel/#orgca3556d)      *   [1.2. Input modes at a glance](https://dakra.github.io/ghostel/#org8341b72)    *   [2. Requirements](https://dakra.github.io/ghostel/#requirements)  *   [3.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ghostel.el is a terminal emulator for Emacs powered by `libghostty-vt`, designed to offer better performance and correctness than existing alternatives like `vterm` or `eat` &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881207&quot; title=&quot;Hi! Maintainer of Ghostel here. baokaola and I actually wanted to do a &amp;#39;Show HN&amp;#39; next week,  but looks like someone was faster submitting the link. Have a look at the GitHub repo which is a bit nicer  for a quick overview: https://github.com/dakra/ghostel To add some context, Ghostel is a terminal emulator for Emacs  powered by libghostty-vt. There&amp;#39;s a feature comparison vs vterm and eat: https://dakra.github.io/ghostel/#ghostel-vs-vterm And here is a gist with images to compare performance and…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880917&quot; title=&quot;I recently switched from vterm to ghostel, and it is generally much, much better - noticeably faster (e.g. fancy TUI apps that try to refresh the whole terminal every frame actually work), more reliable input handling, and a nicer ELisp API. That being said, there are still some rough edges. Sometimes it fails to properly clear the terminal, leaving junk at the top of the buffer before the currrent prompt line. And on a couple of occasions it has totally frozen, with no fix other than killing…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While users praise its speed and keyboard-driven navigation, some report occasional &amp;#34;rough edges&amp;#34; such as terminal clearing bugs or freezes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880917&quot; title=&quot;I recently switched from vterm to ghostel, and it is generally much, much better - noticeably faster (e.g. fancy TUI apps that try to refresh the whole terminal every frame actually work), more reliable input handling, and a nicer ELisp API. That being said, there are still some rough edges. Sometimes it fails to properly clear the terminal, leaving junk at the top of the buffer before the currrent prompt line. And on a couple of occasions it has totally frozen, with no fix other than killing…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881025&quot; title=&quot;Ghostel co-maintainer here: Understand if you don&amp;#39;t have a repro, but if you ever have something actionable we&amp;#39;d love it if you filed an issue, or have the information get to us some other way. The junk at the top of the screen sounds like it could be https://github.com/dakra/ghostel/issues/495 and it should be fixed on later versions. But maybe you&amp;#39;re seeing another bug. The tricky part is replicating the libghostty-vt internal data into an Emacs buffer while only replacing the parts that need…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. A point of contention exists regarding buffer integration: while some miss the deep text manipulation of `eshell`, maintainers highlight &amp;#34;line-mode&amp;#34; as a way to provide a similar buffer-centric experience for shell commands &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881932&quot; title=&quot;Hi dakra! &amp;gt; is there something Ghostel is missing eshell allows me to manipulate text as I would in any other Emacs buffer. If I have a function which wraps a word in quotes, and bind it to a key, I can be confident it will work in eshell like it does anywhere else. It&amp;#39;s a real killer feature. If I use evil-mode, or xah-fly-keys, or simply want to use ispell to correct the spelling of a word, it all works. Unfortunately with Ghostel none of this works. It&amp;#39;s not integrated in the same way. There…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882126&quot; title=&quot;Did you see ghostel line-mode?  This basically gives you a `M-x shell` experience where everything is a buffer and nothing is send to the terminal until you press enter. There you could type on the prompt line and then call jinx or your quote wrapping function etc as it&amp;#39;s just a normal Emacs buffer.  You can&amp;#39;t edit the scrollback buffer though, but I don&amp;#39;t think that&amp;#39;s possible in eshell either. But line-mode has it&amp;#39;s own set of problems. Since we don&amp;#39;t send anything to the shell, you could have…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882785&quot; title=&quot;Editing scrollback is possible in eshell, and something I use often.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, some users remain hesitant to move all processes into Emacs due to concerns about long-running tasks blocking the editor&amp;#39;s UI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882961&quot; title=&quot;I think the thing that stops me from running more processes inside emacs is that a large diff parse from magit or similar can block everything, and so I end up keeping a separate terminal around anyway.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fabiensanglard.net/extinct/index.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Don&amp;#39;t you mean extinct?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (fabiensanglard.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881830&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;189 points · 120 comments · by zdw&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Drawing a parallel to the transition from stop-motion to CGI in *Jurassic Park*, this article encourages programmers to adapt to LLMs by treating them as essential tools for evolving their craft rather than a threat to their professional existence. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fabiensanglard.net/extinct/index.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Don&amp;#39;t you mean extinct?    URL Source: https://fabiensanglard.net/extinct/index.html    Published Time: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 00:16:09 GMT    Markdown Content:  Jul 10, 2026    Don&amp;#39;t you mean extinct?  In 1993, Jurassic Park came out and revolutionized the use of CGI in films[[1]](https://fabiensanglard.net/extinct/index.html#footnote_1). To the public the experience was magic. But for some of the people in the movie industry, it was a rude awakening.    Director Steven Spielberg had hired stop-motion…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate centers on whether refusing to use LLMs leads to professional obsolescence, with some arguing that AI provides an objective cognitive advantage in speed and memory &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48883065&quot; title=&quot;No, he is correct. LLMs have much larger working memories for the kind of details you work with in programming tasks. You are at an objective cognitive deficit by not taking advantage of this. Everybody knows what he means by left behind. When you program, you do so with a goal in mind, and you will not be able to reach that goal as quickly without LLMs. You will be outcompeted by those who use them, and this means that opportunities to contribute professionally, in open source, etc. will be…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48883362&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I prefer spending some time to design suitable data structures/algorithms for the problem at hand. I&amp;#39;m doing this at LLM speed now. I feel like I&amp;#39;m doing the work of two whole teams and designing rock-solid software. Rust, strong types, enums, fantastic interfaces, brevity.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics contend that software engineering bottlenecks are rarely about coding volume, but rather bureaucracy, design, and clarifying business requirements &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882361&quot; title=&quot;I mostly like this article but &amp;gt; Those who refuse to use an LLM will fall behind because they won&amp;#39;t be able to produce as much Seems like a silly and needlessly aggressive take. Fall behind what? Able to produce &amp;#39;as much&amp;#39; what? I&amp;#39;ve never been evaluated on volume in my life. Nor have co workers who were severely &amp;#39;behind&amp;#39; ever feared for their jobs.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882659&quot; title=&quot;Just about every professional coding job I&amp;#39;ve ever had has had programmers eager to code more, complaining about how much rigmarole there is around making changes, complaining about constant meetings and endless bureaucracy around change management and requirements.  Meanwhile business mostly saw programmer velocity and output as a problem and a business risk, as they struggled to keep up with the rate of change and kept stepping on the brakes. Like realistically even without LLMs I output…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882990&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;  My output sometimes rivals that of entire teams&amp;#39; I&amp;#39;ve been part of, mostly because I get to just code to my heart&amp;#39;s content. The fact is that often I code less than most of my peers. Because I prefer spending some time to design suitable data structures/algorithms for the problem at hand. I don&amp;#39;t aim for perfection, just that it align with the business domain (and/or the interface) so that future works are proportional with the scope of change requests. This has reflected in small commits…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see LLMs as essential for debugging and navigating complex &amp;#34;issues&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48883046&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Fall behind what? Able to produce &amp;#39;as much&amp;#39; what? Customer meaningful features that move the needle on the business. I think this is strictly true. And not because LLMs can write code faster. I think it&amp;#39;s true even if you&amp;#39;re still writing most of your code by hand and using the LLM as an assistant. My anecdotal but decades-long observation is that most of the time=cost of a project comes not from writing code, but from dealing with &amp;#39;issues&amp;#39;. Weird bugs, surprising behaviors, spec ambiguities,…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that true architectural design remains a human-centric task that code-generation speed cannot improve &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48883995&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Rust, strong types, enums, fantastic interfaces, brevity. That&amp;#39;s not what suitable data structures/algorithms mean. What you stated are mere helpers and still pertains to the realms of coding, not design. Coding isn&amp;#39;t and never was the issue. It is a tool and not the intent. Think about what would stand universally true whether you use Go, C, JavaScript, Assembly,... The organization of data (information), and the process of transforming it (computation). Those do not depends on code. We…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a ideological divide regarding the &amp;#34;hacker&amp;#34; ethos, with concerns over the proprietary nature of major LLMs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882403&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Ride the wave.&amp;#39; Or don&amp;#39;t. Most LLMs people are using to code are paywalled, and controlled by private, for-profit entities. This is fundamentally different than the past, and diametrically opposed to the hacker. If you&amp;#39;re a hacker, which most of you are not (things have changed here over time), you will reject this.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, though others point to the viability of local, open-weight models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882896&quot; title=&quot;You can accomplish quite a lot with smaller local models on reasonably priced pro tier hardware (not cheap hardware, but very attainable hardware for anyone making average software engineer money). Qwen 3.6 27B and 35BA3, Gemma 28B, and so on are incredibly beneficial even if Anthropic and OpenAI produce better options. Failing that, GLM 5.2 is open weights, trades blows with current frontier models and widely available on commodity inference providers. And you could run it yourself if you do…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ploy.ai/blog/migrating-a-production-ai-agent-to-gpt-5-6&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Migrating a production AI agent to GPT-5.6: 2.2x faster, 27% cheaper&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ploy.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882716&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;182 points · 71 comments · by brryant&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ploy has migrated its production AI agent from Claude Opus to OpenAI’s new GPT-5.6 Sol, achieving 2.2x faster build times and a 27% reduction in costs. The transition required significant engineering adjustments to tool-call schemas, prompt caching strategies, and reasoning replay to maintain high-quality design standards. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ploy.ai/blog/migrating-a-production-ai-agent-to-gpt-5-6&quot; title=&quot;Title: Migrating a production AI agent to GPT-5.6    URL Source: https://ploy.ai/blog/migrating-a-production-ai-agent-to-gpt-5-6    Published Time: 2026-07-09T00:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: Colorful Ploy inflatable forms connected by a translucent tube, representing a production AI agent migrating between model systems](https://storage.googleapis.com/ployai/d21bf4ad-2458-43ee-9561-54c28ab0e85f/user/98bfdea9-ai-generated-1783640379759.webp)    As of today, Ploy’s agent runs on GPT-5.6…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the &amp;#34;llmish&amp;#34; writing style of the article, with users debating whether the distracting syntax and repetitive formatting of AI-generated text undermine the technical substance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884370&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Numbers like that buy a model a real migration effort. Such a silly choice of words. I wish the human directing the LLM writing the article put some effort into rewriting the worst examples of LLM style. &amp;gt; But it did extremely well, and the promise was immediate and specific: builds finishing in less than half the wall-clock time, at 27% lower cost, scoring at or above our incumbent on completed work. The way the LLMs write (Claude perhaps?) With short phrases separated by colons, commas or…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885380&quot; title=&quot;Not OP but my frustrations come from it being impossible to ignore and outright distracting. I&amp;#39;ve found the same thing showing with Claude-coded/designed front ends that overuse the same semi-monospaced fonts, Blue/Yellow/Red palette and rounded corner borders. It isn&amp;#39;t that it is bad , but it often isn&amp;#39;t fit for purpose. You&amp;#39;re right it wont change anything, but authors shouldn&amp;#39;t be surprised when people who care about their time/attention comment on low/no effort pieces.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48886216&quot; title=&quot;No but it&amp;#39;s a useful shorthand to describe a type of bad writing. I also think that people should focus on substance and not if AI was used, but AI writes like shit and I find myself retching a bit when I have to read long AI-written documents. Do they say something useful? Maybe, but when my eyes are glazing over because it&amp;#39;s just so exhausting trying to parse what&amp;#39;s written, I can&amp;#39;t tell. I certainly think less of people when they have such poor taste that they think writing like that is…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885684&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The way the LLMs write (Claude perhaps?) With short phrases separated by colons, commas or full stops, is so poor and frustrating. Yup llmish (from now on it&amp;#39;s called &amp;#39;llmish&amp;#39;) sucks. But I&amp;#39;d say: at this point it&amp;#39;s probably trivial to write a browser extension that detects llmish and that rewrites the worst sentences: from llmish to something less irritating to read. Heck, I could spent tokens on that: an extension that changes on the fly llmish found on webpages. Also I&amp;#39;d say there&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that readers should focus on the content rather than the author&amp;#39;s tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885271&quot; title=&quot;Can we get over the detective work about if the text was written by LLM or not in 2026 already ? This is a lost cause, and we could instead focus on substance over syntax.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48886119&quot; title=&quot;critique of writing style isn&amp;#39;t made better by claiming it was authored by an LLM&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the bland, &amp;#34;politically correct&amp;#34; nature of LLM prose makes long documents exhausting to parse &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48886216&quot; title=&quot;No but it&amp;#39;s a useful shorthand to describe a type of bad writing. I also think that people should focus on substance and not if AI was used, but AI writes like shit and I find myself retching a bit when I have to read long AI-written documents. Do they say something useful? Maybe, but when my eyes are glazing over because it&amp;#39;s just so exhausting trying to parse what&amp;#39;s written, I can&amp;#39;t tell. I certainly think less of people when they have such poor taste that they think writing like that is…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885684&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The way the LLMs write (Claude perhaps?) With short phrases separated by colons, commas or full stops, is so poor and frustrating. Yup llmish (from now on it&amp;#39;s called &amp;#39;llmish&amp;#39;) sucks. But I&amp;#39;d say: at this point it&amp;#39;s probably trivial to write a browser extension that detects llmish and that rewrites the worst sentences: from llmish to something less irritating to read. Heck, I could spent tokens on that: an extension that changes on the fly llmish found on webpages. Also I&amp;#39;d say there&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Regarding the technical migration, commenters suggest optimizing costs by using smaller models like Luna for tool orchestration while reserving high-end models for human interaction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885442&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; we’ve made GPT 5.6 Sol the default model powering every Ploy workspace I would consider Luna for parts of the workload that touch actual tools. It is surprisingly capable and it runs fast. Sol is great at talking to the human and orchestration of agent calls, but it&amp;#39;s just too expensive to use everywhere. You can get 5 Luna runs for the cost of 1 Sol run. Statistically speaking, going from one to five samples is a pretty big deal.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48883952&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Ploy’s agent builds and edits real marketing websites. It plans a page, reads the codebase, writes components, generates imagery, screenshots its own work, and decides when it’s done. That job description sets a very high bar for a model, and we test every frontier release against it. For the four months Opus held the default slot (first Opus 4.7, then 4.8), nothing we tested beat it. Well, unlike OP I haven&amp;#39;t run a rigorous test, but I still would expect Fable to be significantly better at…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-science-research-flattens-discovery&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI boosts research careers but narrow the span of ideas explored: study&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (spectrum.ieee.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881043&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;143 points · 103 comments · by zaikunzhang&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A study of 40 million papers reveals that while AI tools significantly accelerate research productivity and career advancement, they narrow scientific discovery by clustering studies around data-rich, popular topics and reducing the overall variety of ideas explored. &lt;a href=&quot;https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-science-research-flattens-discovery&quot; title=&quot;Title: AI in Science Research Boosts Speed, Limits Scope    URL Source: https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-science-research-flattens-discovery    Published Time: 2026-01-19T14:00:02Z    Markdown Content:  Opens in a new window Opens an external website Opens an external website in a new window    This website utilizes technologies such as cookies to enable essential site functionality, as well as for analytics, personalization, and targeted advertising. [Privacy…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether AI’s tendency to narrow research focus is a temporary adaptation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881444&quot; title=&quot;Any flattening of discovery due to AI, but will be temporary. We tend to think that obvious potential is the same as realized potential, for new technology. For any specific context, there are generally innumerable smaller adaptations and capability thresholds that have to be crossed. And the price for that journey is often temporary loss off overt productivity.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; or a permanent cap on human knowledge caused by a reliance on &amp;#34;autocomplete&amp;#34; logic rather than deep, independent thought &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881567&quot; title=&quot;No, this is significantly more permanent.  LLMs are autocomplete generators based off current context, and training generations of people to always ask the planet burners instead of learning to think for themselves - and never having the experience of having to slowly think over the same thing for an extended period - may well mean a permanent cap to human knowledge and a dramatic slowdown or end to new knowledge.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881424&quot; title=&quot;“Technology that is based on everything humanity has already done, fails to do things that humanity has not yet done”&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Some argue that AI is merely amplifying existing systemic flaws, where researchers prioritize citation metrics and career advancement over genuine discovery &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881536&quot; title=&quot;As with other fields touched, AI is merely amplifying what was already there. The aim of many scientists isn&amp;#39;t discovery in and of itself. Discovery is a side effect of their primary drive to publish and - hopefully - become well known. And establishments only make things worse, because it&amp;#39;s the things that are most likely to produce tangible results (the papers, or economically valuable products) that get the most funding.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881680&quot; title=&quot;I agree with some parts, but not all. I see it as an overfitting problem. Fundamentally, the topic here seems to be that citation indices and similar metrics are actually flawed indicators, and obsessing over them is just Goodhart&amp;#39;s law in action. Ultimately, the argument is that the entire design of those metrics is wrong.  To be precise, it was a good metric at first, but now that the scale has changed, it&amp;#39;s become bad. This is common in programming too—things that are correct in the beginning…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881870&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Scientists who adopt AI gain productivity and visibility: On average, they publish three times as many papers, receive nearly five times as many citations, and become team leaders a year or two earlier than those who do not. To me this effect doesn’t seem to reflect on AI very much, it seems to reflect on humans. Like maybe this is more evidence of the Babble Hypothesis and the incentives in research than AI, no? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babble_hypothesis&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While critics worry that bypassing the &amp;#34;struggle&amp;#34; of difficult problems will hamper human cognition &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881899&quot; title=&quot;There is two different types of learning people are talking about. The first type happens when you are enthusiastically engaged in a topic, which LLMs will likely enhance. The second type happens as a by-product of solving a, perhaps deeply uncomfortably, difficult problem. This is what people are talking about when they say LLMs will hamper human cognition. Instead of sitting there for an hour and struggling, people will instead reflexively give in and ask an LLM to solve it for them.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that AI’s ability to consolidate biased human research will actually accelerate breakthroughs for those who embrace the technology &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881680&quot; title=&quot;I agree with some parts, but not all. I see it as an overfitting problem. Fundamentally, the topic here seems to be that citation indices and similar metrics are actually flawed indicators, and obsessing over them is just Goodhart&amp;#39;s law in action. Ultimately, the argument is that the entire design of those metrics is wrong.  To be precise, it was a good metric at first, but now that the scale has changed, it&amp;#39;s become bad. This is common in programming too—things that are correct in the beginning…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881789&quot; title=&quot;You act like humanity doesn&amp;#39;t exist in a competitive environment. If you think AI codegen is a mistake? Just relax, keep writing code by hand and wait for the pendulum to prove you right while showering you in wealth. There are plenty of people making this bet, and I wish the best of luck to you because I&amp;#39;m 99% certain you&amp;#39;re on the losing end of it.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881800&quot; title=&quot;when a parent answers their child&amp;#39;s question, does it decrease the curiosity of the child? many children have an unlimited capacity to ask &amp;#39;why?&amp;#39;. many adults are the same if the abilities of AI are finite, then we will continue to have burning curiosity, questions to ask, and discoveries to make&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.larp.website/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LARP – Revenue infrastructure for serious founders&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (larp.website)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882569&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;202 points · 42 comments · by BerislavLopac&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LARP is a satirical website that mocks &amp;#34;round-trip&amp;#34; accounting by offering a platform where founders can artificially inflate revenue through circular, net-zero cash transactions with peers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.larp.website/&quot; title=&quot;Title: LARP — Revenue infrastructure for serious founders    URL Source: https://www.larp.website/    Markdown Content:  ⇄ LARP    [Start a loop](https://www.larp.website/#ledger)  Series A–ready revenue infrastructure    ## Revenue is just an agreement between friends.    LARP pairs you with another founder. You send them **$10,000**. They send you **$10,000** right back. You&amp;#39;ve both now booked **$10,000 in revenue**. The books balance. Cash never moves. Everybody&amp;#39;s a rocketship.    [Run your first loop…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a trend where YC-backed startups generate initial traction by selling primarily to other companies within the same or recent batches &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884317&quot; title=&quot;If you go through the most recent YC batches, it&amp;#39;s insane how much of their &amp;#39;customer list&amp;#39; is just other companies in the same or recent batches&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884451&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s the YC playbook. I guess it works, Corgi for example a &amp;#39;AI&amp;#39; insurance company with like only 5 real engineers and a bunch of growth people. Their main customer is other startups mostly YC. Same with Delve.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this circular flow of capital creates economic value or mimics broader economic patterns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48883542&quot; title=&quot;What people miss from these things is that there is economic value being created. For example, if you gift someone a $100 Amazon gift card, but they also gift you a $100 Amazon gift card. Has any gift actually been exchanged? Yes, the sentiment of giving. Or if someone pays you $100 to eat a pile of shit, and then you use the same $100 to pay them to eat a pile of shit, you both have eaten, but the money is in the same place it started. In the end, if you paint a big enough picture, all money…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48883703&quot; title=&quot;It worked for NVidia.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884149&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m confused how circulating legal tender between 2 parties could be cooking books or fraud. Each party can absolutely claim they made money from the transaction. The fact they lost money in a different transaction is a separate concern.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend it is an inefficient &amp;#34;playbook&amp;#34; used to inflate growth metrics for future funding rounds before achieving true product-market fit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884547&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, they raise a massive round on traction from other YC companies then need to find the real Product Market Fit (enterprise and others) after that round. It&amp;#39;s actually very inefficient&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884785&quot; title=&quot;yc circular funding scam&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics further suggest this practice can border on &amp;#34;cooking the books&amp;#34; or masking fundamental business weaknesses, specifically citing concerns over the stability of companies like Corgi &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48884948&quot; title=&quot;Corgi is even worse than just circular revenue, their entire insurance business is a house of cards: https://reticulating.substack.com/p/ycombinators-corgi-insur...&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48883627&quot; title=&quot;The moving of money across time is 100% central to money&amp;#39;s value. Passing digital money around to cook the books is moving money... fraudulently. So yeah, they&amp;#39;re not the same unless you&amp;#39;re goaling on the semantic purity of the word &amp;#39;move&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885617&quot; title=&quot;Neither of your examples shows “economic value being created”.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://odinbook.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Understanding the Odin programming language&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (odinbook.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880499&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;149 points · 93 comments · by AlexeyBrin&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Karl Zylinski’s book, *Understanding the Odin Programming Language*, provides a comprehensive guide to low-level programming, covering topics from manual memory management to data-oriented design for developers of all experience levels. &lt;a href=&quot;https://odinbook.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Understanding the Odin Programming Language    URL Source: https://odinbook.com/    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: Understanding the Odin Programming Language by Karl Zylinski](https://odinbook.com/cover.jpg)    Do you want to learn the Odin Programming Language and demystify low-level programming?    Then this book is for you.    [Read a sample](https://odinbook.com/sample.html) or [buy now](https://store.zylinski.se/b/tnwvO)    _Understanding the Odin Programming Language_ is a book that teaches…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Odin is praised for its low overhead and seamless C interoperability, which some users find superior to Rust and Zig for systems and embedded programming &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881202&quot; title=&quot;Having fun with this. Never bought into rust (have studied, have a (mostly AI-generated app in rust). Wrote some Zig but Odin is even less overhead for me. I first loved Zigs built-in build system but having tried to wrap/use C libraries from both, I must say I prefer Odin.  Wrapping some sqlite 3 API’s for my first little Odin program - just because I need so little of the API that it seems easier this way - and speaking to C from Odin is a pleasure. That is, imho, where Rust fails the most -…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881360&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been using Odin for about 6 months now, and to be honest, it&amp;#39;s hard to find fault with it. I&amp;#39;ve used it for STM32 microcontroller firmware, web and desktop applications, and all are performant and compile quickly. My one issue is (and I&amp;#39;m fully aware it will never happen) I do wish there was some sort of first-class solution to inheritance. I&amp;#39;ve grown to love procedural programming, but some problems really are just better solved with a more OOP approach. Just because classes exist does…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. A central debate in the thread concerns the rejection of RAII and OOP patterns; proponents of Odin and similar &amp;#34;data-oriented&amp;#34; languages argue that RAII couples allocation with initialization in a way that hurts performance in high-stakes environments like game development &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881426&quot; title=&quot;Casey Muratori and Jon Blow have pushed this concept frequently. They largely don&amp;#39;t deeply elaborate, which is sad because I am a professional game developer who is interested in precisely presented knowledge so I can apply it to my work. My interpretation is that games want to allocate large pools of resources, like GPU buffers, cpu memory, etc, and reuse that memory over and over. Ie: Reinitialize it. In my experience, RAII is my preferred pattern for certain things (std::lock_guard), and you…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881947&quot; title=&quot;From what I understood, their critique of RAII is twofold: coupling of allocation and initialisation, and enforcement of deallocation. The ease of use of smart pointers makes it tempting to allocate/free of temporary structures even within one single function. Given enough number of such occurrences, it kills performance by a thousand cuts. Also I remember they mentioned it’s not necessary to free memory if you’re about to close your program, because the OS will take the memory back. Obviously…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some critics dismiss these views as dogmatic or &amp;#34;influencer&amp;#34; rhetoric &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881876&quot; title=&quot;Casey Muratori and Jon Blow are both hyper-dogmatic &amp;#39;my way or the highway&amp;#39; types, and, crucially, neither of them has built any of the super high fidelity types of game that would require that level of optimisation. They&amp;#39;re basically influencer types.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that modern languages like Rust already solve these allocation issues more efficiently than older languages like Java &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882842&quot; title=&quot;Casey spends a lot of effort on what he considers an anti-pattern where you&amp;#39;re making a huge number of separate objects. I think a lot of this comes from Java, a language where all the user defined types actually are obliged to be heap allocations. If I make a Goose type, and I say I want a Goose, Java will allocate space on the heap for the Goose and put my Goose there, that&amp;#39;s really how Java works. If I make a growable array of them ArrayList , and add each of 500 geese, that&amp;#39;s 500…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48882883&quot; title=&quot;Maybe I&amp;#39;m missing something but when would the 500 geese instances ever be stack allocated in Rust? That comparison seems unfair, the lifetime of that kind of object isn&amp;#39;t going to be compatible with stack allocation. Allocations are really really cheap in Java by the way, so I don&amp;#39;t get how 500 allocations would even be an issue.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/cosmtrek/mindwalk&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Mindwalk – Replay coding-agent sessions on a 3D map of your codebase&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48878682&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;151 points · 62 comments · by cosmtrek&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mindwalk is an open-source Go tool that visualizes coding-agent sessions by replaying their file interactions on a 3D map of a codebase to reveal the agent&amp;#39;s exploration and editing patterns. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/cosmtrek/mindwalk&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - cosmtrek/mindwalk: A visualization tool that replays coding-agent sessions on a 3D map of your codebase.    URL Source: https://github.com/cosmtrek/mindwalk    Markdown Content:  A visualization tool that replays coding-agent sessions on a 3D map of your codebase.    mindwalk-demo.mp4[Video…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While users find the 3D visualization aesthetically pleasing, many question its practical utility, arguing that it may add more friction than traditional, efficient methods for scanning code changes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48879982&quot; title=&quot;Other than being aesthetically pleasing (which it doubtlessly is), what&amp;#39;s the use case for this?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880024&quot; title=&quot;2019, in a comment about gource: &amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s pretty, but I can&amp;#39;t think of anything I&amp;#39;d use it as a &amp;#39;tool&amp;#39; for. - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21560013 Seems any time this sort of software comes up on, people can&amp;#39;t let the use case be &amp;#39;this is aesthetically pleasing&amp;#39;. Anyways, besides that, the README does clearly state &amp;#39;The Problem&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;The Idea&amp;#39; which outlines exactly why the author built this particular project.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48879699&quot; title=&quot;This reminds me of that community epsiode where they get the VR system and the dean has to walk through a maze, climb up several things so that they can go to a filing cabinet and then retrive a file. Yes, its cool to see and watch but it seems to be adding more friction than reducing it. Like who is going to spend that much time watching what their agents did when there are far quicker and efficient ways of scanning through changes and organizing code with better ergonomics?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents suggest the tool could be valuable for comparing how different AI models interact with a codebase or for quickly gauging if an agent has become &amp;#34;smarter&amp;#34; through visual patterns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880207&quot; title=&quot;A lot of people want a use case. One I think might be cool is some kind of spatial/represented comparison: let&amp;#39;s see how two different models interact with the codebase (for the same problem), what they touched, and what they did. Or the same model, but averaged across 100 runs, so we can see how much variance there really is per task. Something along those lines sounds interesting to me.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880603&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; A lot of people want a use case. I think the issue is, on the surface this is very much a &amp;#39;watch this non-deterministic actvity&amp;#39; but I can see the value in it. This is self promotional but I am working on a &amp;#39;Brain&amp;#39; ( https://github.com/gitsense/pi-brains ) for the Pi ( https://github.com/earendil-works/pi ) coding agent and I can actually see this being quite useful to quickly tell if you did make an agent smarter or not. There is obviously different ways you can do this, but I can see being…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Others noted the project&amp;#39;s similarity to previous visualizers like Gource and suggested technical improvements, such as glyph-level rendering for better detail &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881031&quot; title=&quot;Hey OP, this is absolutely awesome and I am very much on your creative wavelength! I&amp;#39;d love to get in contact with you if you have a moment, as I&amp;#39;ve built an adjacent 3D visualizer that might complement the rendering portion of your system by providing actual glyph-level rendering of each file instead of block-based representations (glyph3d.dev). I have a similar &amp;#39;trace&amp;#39; feature that shows files pre/post edit from CC at the moment, so there is some definitely interesting overlap. Well done…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880024&quot; title=&quot;2019, in a comment about gource: &amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s pretty, but I can&amp;#39;t think of anything I&amp;#39;d use it as a &amp;#39;tool&amp;#39; for. - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21560013 Seems any time this sort of software comes up on, people can&amp;#39;t let the use case be &amp;#39;this is aesthetically pleasing&amp;#39;. Anyways, besides that, the README does clearly state &amp;#39;The Problem&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;The Idea&amp;#39; which outlines exactly why the author built this particular project.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://shellzine.net/cyberpunk-comics/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cyberpunk Comics, Manga and Graphic Novels&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (shellzine.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885643&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;137 points · 37 comments · by zdw&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article provides a chronological guide to essential cyberpunk illustrated literature, ranging from genre-defining classics like *The Long Tomorrow* and *Akira* to modern franchise expansions of *Blade Runner* and *Ghost in the Shell*. The list highlights key themes such as dystopia, cybernetics, and the evolution of digital art styles. &lt;a href=&quot;https://shellzine.net/cyberpunk-comics/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Cyberpunk Comics, Manga and Graphic Novels    URL Source: https://shellzine.net/cyberpunk-comics/    Published Time: 2026-07-07T02:08:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  _A list of illustrated literature spanning Western comics, Japanese manga and graphic novels. Sorted by publication date._    * * *    ![Image 1](https://shellzine.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/thelongtomorrow-.jpg)  **The Long Tomorrow** | By: Dan O’Bannon &amp;amp; Moebius | Setting Date: Far Future    Published: 1975 | Type: Graphic Novel |…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some readers welcome the new *Ghost in the Shell* anime for its stylistic return to the original 1989 manga &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48885899&quot; title=&quot;Coincidentally, there is a new Ghost in the Shell anime that&amp;#39;s premiering now on Amazon Prime Video. It&amp;#39;s animation style and mood are closely aligned with the original 1989 manga, which is to say it&amp;#39;s more cartoonish and light-hearted. I prefer the more adult oriented content the franchise was putting out up until about 2006, but the new anime series gives me hope that we might eventually see a follow-up animation of Shirow Masamune&amp;#39;s Man/Machine Interface - what was once considered to be…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue the franchise has been &amp;#34;done to death&amp;#34; through excessive reboots and should be replaced by new IP &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48886220&quot; title=&quot;Personally I think I&amp;#39;m done with GitS at this point. How many times has it been rebooted, like a dozen times? The last one I enjoyed watching was Arise but I lost track after that. I think the series has been done to death and I would love to see some completely new IP from Masamune that is more reflective of the AI and economic upheavals we are experiencing in the 20s.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters noted that the original creator, Masamune Shirow, is unlikely to produce new mainstream work due to his long-term pivot into adult manga and &amp;#34;hentai-ish&amp;#34; art &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48886576&quot; title=&quot;You&amp;#39;re probably not going to get it. And he has decent reasons for not wanting to bother. The nature (infamy?) of his activities over the past few years should also be noted. (And maybe chuckled at if you have a bit of a dark sense of humor.)&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48887650&quot; title=&quot;For those who don&amp;#39;t know, like me: he moved into adult manga, hentai-ish poster book work. His popularity may have corrupted him... https://appleseed.fandom.com/wiki/Shirow_Masamune&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a consensus that the list is idiosyncratic, with users suggesting the inclusion of missing classics like *Transmetropolitan*, *Hard Boiled*, *Judge Dredd*, and *Patlabor* &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48886348&quot; title=&quot;This is a bit of an idiosyncratic list. Two of my favorite additions from my own youth: Hard Boiled by Frank Miller and Geof Darrow and Batman: Digital Justice. The latter now reads like a bit of a corny cash grab for the early &amp;#39;90s cyber fad, but I still love the time capsule of some if its art.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48886967&quot; title=&quot;I think the list could include Transmetropolitan.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48886271&quot; title=&quot;It might be skirting the edges of what is considered cyberpunk since it has Mecha elements but Patlabor is a fantastic manga/series that should have been included in this list [1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patlabor:_The_Movie&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48888071&quot; title=&quot;No Judge Dredd (which dates back to 1977) or anything else from 2000 AD ?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://my.uscap.org/uscap/program/S0tc675/index.cfm?pgid=5167&amp;amp;sid=14770&amp;amp;abid=51228&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Autopsy Study Finds Replicating SARS-CoV-2 in the Hearts of Long Covid&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (my.uscap.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877214&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;126 points · 46 comments · by thenerdhead&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An autopsy study found evidence of replicating SARS-CoV-2 in the hearts of some Long Covid patients, linking viral persistence to structural heart changes, inflammation, and altered gene expression long after the initial infection. &lt;a href=&quot;https://my.uscap.org/uscap/program/S0tc675/index.cfm?pgid=5167&amp;sid=14770&amp;abid=51228&quot; title=&quot;Title: USCAP 2026 Annual Meeting    URL Source: https://my.uscap.org/uscap/program/S0tc675/index.cfm?pgid=5167&amp;amp;sid=14770&amp;amp;abid=51228    Markdown Content:  #### Info    **Poster Board Number:**     279    **Background:**    SARS-CoV-2 RNA can persist in tissues long after initial infection, but with unclear significance. After acute illness, some patients experience persistent symptoms of potential cardiac origin, such as palpitations, chest pain, shortness of breath, and fatigue consistent with cardiac Long…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion reflects a growing consensus that viral infections are rarely &amp;#34;benign&amp;#34; and may cause permanent damage or persist indefinitely within the body, contributing to long-term conditions like dementia, MS, and ME/CFS &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880631&quot; title=&quot;After seeing studies like this, and how the shingles vaccine reduces dimensia, I have become increasingly convinced that it’s bad to get almost any disease, even transiently. I used to think that it was kind of good to train your immune system (kind of whatever doesn’t kill you makes you stronger). I no longer believe that. I believe that diseases often cause unknown effects and it’s better to avoid disease entirely, that vaccines are actually more beneficial than current studies show in this…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881639&quot; title=&quot;You can and should train your immune system, but not by fighting the enemy. Train it with a sparring partner - a vaccine. Many people think that viruses are as benign as common flu (influenza), or common cold (rhinoviruses), because that what they experienced themselves and parents and schools don&amp;#39;t do a good job of explaining just how bad some diseases are. (To &amp;#39;protect&amp;#39; the children, perhaps?) But most viruses are not as &amp;#39;polite&amp;#39; as the flu or a cold. All herpesviruses (chickenpox, classic…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880794&quot; title=&quot;I am now pretty certain every virus we have ever caught is just smouldering in our body somewhere constantly held in check by the immune system. We seem to just accumulate ever increasing issues until our body can&amp;#39;t cope anymore and become symptomatic with damage and then ultimately die. We have had a huge blindspot for the damage viruses are doing to people, I doubt any infection leaves us. The research from Covid is just finding so much evidence for tissue resident viral infection and prior…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881158&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s established that COVID can persist in tissue/blood - particularly in immunocompromised patients - and is associated with long COVID [1]. This abstract only reports a cut-off of &amp;gt;60 days from COVID infection, so it&amp;#39;s hard to know how many of these deceased patients are truly outside the acute infection phase. Although this research area is the most promising avenue for long COVID -- wrt biologic rationale -- the major anti-viral trials for long COVID were negative. STOP-PASC trial [2] and…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users emphasize that vaccines are a safer way to &amp;#34;train&amp;#34; the immune system than natural infection, others highlight the complexity of vaccine side effects, such as myocarditis, though they debate whether an organic infection would have been more damaging &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881417&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;I used to think that it was kind of good to train your immune system (kind of whatever doesn’t kill you makes you stronger). I no longer believe that. Well, that&amp;#39;s essentially what vaccines do, anyway, except that they train the immune system without requiring you to go through the full disease. As a side note, I developed myocarditis after a COVID vaccine which damaged heart tissue and caused an AV block.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881437&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m interested in your perspective, Do you think you&amp;#39;re more mad you got the vaccine, or more greatful that you did because an organic infection would have done more damage?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881631&quot; title=&quot;The more interesting question is whether he would have got the myocarditis if he had not taken the vaccine. I think he would have.  And might have died of COVID on top of it.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the biological evidence for viral persistence in Long Covid, participants note that clinical trials for antivirals like Paxlovid have yet to show significant improvement in patient outcomes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881158&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s established that COVID can persist in tissue/blood - particularly in immunocompromised patients - and is associated with long COVID [1]. This abstract only reports a cut-off of &amp;gt;60 days from COVID infection, so it&amp;#39;s hard to know how many of these deceased patients are truly outside the acute infection phase. Although this research area is the most promising avenue for long COVID -- wrt biologic rationale -- the major anti-viral trials for long COVID were negative. STOP-PASC trial [2] and…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://goeteia.dev&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A pure scheme web programming tool&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (goeteia.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877314&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;131 points · 22 comments · by guenchi&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Goeteia is a pure-Scheme web toolkit that compiles to WebAssembly in the browser, offering a self-hosting compiler, reactive DOM templates, and WebGL support. &lt;a href=&quot;https://goeteia.dev&quot; title=&quot;Title: Goeteia — a page that compiles itself    URL Source: https://goeteia.dev/    Markdown Content:  [Goeteia](https://goeteia.dev/index.html)    [Why Scheme?](https://goeteia.dev/why.html)[Manual](https://goeteia.dev/manual.html)[Agents](https://goeteia.dev/agent.html)[GitHub](https://github.com/guenchi/Goeteia)    Built in pure Scheme    Γοητεία The black ars of commanding what lies beneath.    A pure-Scheme web toolkit, compiled to WebAssembly.    $ npm install goeteia    [Try it…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The project is viewed as a &amp;#34;vibecoded&amp;#34; experiment that leverages Scheme’s homoiconicity to provide a more reliable, statically verifiable alternative to JavaScript in an AI-driven development landscape &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877610&quot; title=&quot;This really gets at the issue with JavaScript in the age of AI: it’s just not a terribly statically verifiable language, and DOM work is incredibly prone to failing silently while the app itself is clearly not working. We’ve had to paper over it with TypeScript and frameworks that impose constraints just to stop several classes of bugs, and even then it doesn’t go terribly well. The flip side is that AI is making the underlying code more like a..compilation target? At least in the sense that,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877784&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand this, if I&amp;#39;m honest. WebAssembly is the compilation target. It&amp;#39;s a Scheme compiler for wasm, right? Why is it pretending to be a way to rewrite websites? Wouldn&amp;#39;t that be a job for literally any possible language compiled to WebAssembly? I read the &amp;#39;Why Scheme?&amp;#39; page and it looked entirely AI generated, inasmuch as the reasoning presented confused me, because it didn&amp;#39;t make sense. It references homoiconicity as pretty much the only reason to do this, mentions Lisp once or…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48879361&quot; title=&quot;The second 2 day old vibecoded project by the author, posted minutes after: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877344&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While users appreciate the inclusion of Three.js and the use of S-expressions for handling HTML and CSS, many questioned the specific choice of Scheme over other WebAssembly targets and noted the project&amp;#39;s lack of maturity compared to established tools like Hoot &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877677&quot; title=&quot;Hoot[1] already exists and does a very good job of running scheme in web assembly. Everything Spritely is working on is pretty cool. 1: https://spritely.institute/hoot/&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877784&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand this, if I&amp;#39;m honest. WebAssembly is the compilation target. It&amp;#39;s a Scheme compiler for wasm, right? Why is it pretending to be a way to rewrite websites? Wouldn&amp;#39;t that be a job for literally any possible language compiled to WebAssembly? I read the &amp;#39;Why Scheme?&amp;#39; page and it looked entirely AI generated, inasmuch as the reasoning presented confused me, because it didn&amp;#39;t make sense. It references homoiconicity as pretty much the only reason to do this, mentions Lisp once or…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877817&quot; title=&quot;Hoot is also not a 2 day old vibecoded project.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877315&quot; title=&quot;1 Self hosting in browser with hygienic macros  2 handle HTML and CSS like Scheme (Expand with macro)  3 Use S-expr to send / receive message with server&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877769&quot; title=&quot;Pretty slick it has Three.js built in. I&amp;#39;ve not sure I&amp;#39;ve seen that in a language before in the standard library.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical feedback highlighted significant usability issues, specifically a cursor offset bug in the browser-based editor that makes editing difficult &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877630&quot; title=&quot;I tried to edit the Scheme source but it seems to have a bug where every editing action seems to happen a row above of where the cursor is.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877657&quot; title=&quot;same. Chrome on MacOs. But the code can actually compile and run, once you adjust for the cursor positions.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-07-11</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-07-11</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://io-fund.com/ai-stocks/nvidia-coreweave-nebius-circular-financing-gpu-boom&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Nvidia, CoreWeave, and Nebius: Inside the Circular Financing of the GPU Boom&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (io-fund.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48873836&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;362 points · 167 comments · by adletbalzhanov&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Neoclouds like CoreWeave and Nebius are using circular financing and massive debt to fund rapid AI infrastructure expansion, allowing hyperscalers to offload capital expenditures while securing early access to Nvidia GPUs despite the startups&amp;#39; lack of profitability and rising interest costs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://io-fund.com/ai-stocks/nvidia-coreweave-nebius-circular-financing-gpu-boom&quot; title=&quot;Title: Nvidia, CoreWeave, and Nebius: Inside the Circular Financing of the GPU Boom    URL Source: https://io-fund.com/ai-stocks/nvidia-coreweave-nebius-circular-financing-gpu-boom    Published Time: 2026-06-12    Markdown Content:  *   Neoclouds are seeing massive hyperscaler demand as companies race to scale AI infrastructure, resulting in rapid revenue and backlog growth.  *   Leaders like CoreWeave and Nebius enable this through access to the latest Nvidia GPU’s while also optimizing compute…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether Nvidia’s investments in &amp;#34;neoclouds&amp;#34; like CoreWeave constitute a strategic hedge or a risky circular financing scheme. Proponents argue this is a standard industry practice to diversify the customer base away from hyperscalers and secure a &amp;#34;full stack&amp;#34; ecosystem &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874687&quot; title=&quot;Why is it a big deal? Nvidia invested $2b into CoreWeave for 9% equity stake. CoreWeave is spending $35b in CapEx in 2026. Therefore, Nvidia&amp;#39;s investment is only 5.7% of CoreWeave&amp;#39;s single year CapEx. The other $32b is coming from other sources that isn&amp;#39;t Nvidia. This is hardly circular. Nvidia invests in Neoclouds because it&amp;#39;s a hedge against hyperscalers having too much power, ie designing and prioritizing their own chips, and not fully using Nvidia&amp;#39;s rack design. Neoclouds give hyperscalers…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877014&quot; title=&quot;This is not remotely new. When I worked at Intel ~20 years ago, Intel Capital invested in startups that would buy Intel hardware. Some of them succeeded, some did not. But &amp;#39;invest in companies that may grow your own TAM&amp;#39; is an ancient strategy. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn&amp;#39;t (like any strategy). I&amp;#39;m not disagreeing with you, just saying it&amp;#39;s business as usual.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, while critics warn that Nvidia’s reported revenue may be inflated by &amp;#34;consignment-like&amp;#34; arrangements and financial backstops for unsold capacity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48875528&quot; title=&quot;My understanding is that it&amp;#39;s not about the money itself but the model: - you fund a new company and sign long terms contracts with it   - this new company uses the money you gave it and a lot of debt (backed by long term contracts) to build datacenters and buy a lot of GPU   - your figures look great What happens when they run out of debt or funds? If they reach some kind of profitability it&amp;#39;s not a big deal, but if not ... EDIT Forget to mention the buyback of unused capacity problem: what…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876947&quot; title=&quot;It sounds like Nvidia is not only supplying GPUs first to neoclouds, it is also supplying them for free if they cannot be resold: &amp;#39;Furthermore, in the case of CoreWeave, Nvidia has also provided a significant financial backstop against unsold GPU capacity. Under the agreement with an initial value of $6.3 billion, “in instances where [CoreWeave’s] datacenter capacity is not fully utilized by its own customers, NVIDIA is obligated to purchase the residual unsold capacity through April 13, 2032.”…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Concerns persist that the scale of these IOUs and debt-backed GPU purchases could eventually destabilize the broader economy if the AI boom fails to reach profitability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48875086&quot; title=&quot;Circular financing is a dead horse - dont beat it. Instead, what is more interesting could be: Is there a path to these builds becoming economically profitable ? Towards this, some metrics to watch are: 1) ROI per token per dollar 2) Enterprise token budgets. And at what point there is an overbuild relative to the token roi. Alternatively, pressure on token costs due to the open weights models etc.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876121&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve said it before, I will say it again: all that circular investment, all the IOUs, all the billions of dollars of money that are floating around in the entire AI web... it will seriously wreck the US economy, the volume is orders of magnitude worse than what caused the 2007ff global financial crisis. But if OpenAI and Anthropic both manage to enter the fray as well and automatically get made part of the NASDAQ and MSCI World like SpaceX already did... yeah, then it will fry the US pension…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://studyfinds.com/modern-decor-may-be-straining-peoples-brains/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Modern decor may be straining people&amp;#39;s brains&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (studyfinds.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48873424&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;267 points · 261 comments · by downwithdisease&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A new scientific review suggests that modern architectural patterns and LED lighting may cause headaches and nausea by overloading the brain&amp;#39;s visual processing system. &lt;a href=&quot;https://studyfinds.com/modern-decor-may-be-straining-peoples-brains/&quot; title=&quot;Modern Decor May Be Straining People&amp;#39;s Brains    Scientists say modern buildings, LED lighting, and repetitive patterns may overload the brain&amp;#39;s visual processing system, causing headaches, nausea, and physical distress for millions.    [Skip to content](#main-content)    * [Science](https://studyfinds.com/category/science-technology/)  * [Wellness](https://studyfinds.com/category/wellness/)  * [Food](https://studyfinds.com/category/food/)  * [Lists](https://studyfinds.com/category/best-of-best/)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters debate whether modern minimalism is a &amp;#34;planned impermanence&amp;#34; driven by a transient job market &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48873736&quot; title=&quot;If you&amp;#39;ve ever been in an home owned for generations, filled with books and knickknacks and heirlooms and family photos, despite the clutter it all feels comforting in a way that modern decor doesn&amp;#39;t. The article doesn&amp;#39;t touch much on why modern decor emerged as it did. It&amp;#39;s a market response where everyone needs to (or feels the need to) pick up and move at a moment&amp;#39;s notice. Companies are either expanding or like to think they&amp;#39;ll be expanding soon. People move jobs so often that they have a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; or a status symbol for the wealthy, who can afford the luxury of empty space and the cost of replacing discarded items &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48873845&quot; title=&quot;I am skeptical this is the origin of modern decor.  The trend away from ornamentation, toward simplicity, flatness, etc in design goes back several generations and transcends interior design. If the thesis was true, we&amp;#39;d expect rich people who will never be compelled to move against their will, or to move into less space, would prefer cluttered homey interiors, and poor people would prefer sparse &amp;amp; modern.  In reality, the biggest boosters of modern decor are rich people.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48873927&quot; title=&quot;Only the rich can afford to own nothing/exert effort to have empty space without consequence. Ordinary folks when presented with an object have to perform a mental calculation over the cost/inconvenience of storage vs. disposal and if wanted again, replacement.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874183&quot; title=&quot;Only the rich can afford to own nothing/exert effort to have empty space without consequence. Reminds me of the reason that grass yards exist:  to show the world that one can afford land for the sake of owning it, rather than for growing crops.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some find traditional, cluttered homes more comforting and grounded &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48873736&quot; title=&quot;If you&amp;#39;ve ever been in an home owned for generations, filled with books and knickknacks and heirlooms and family photos, despite the clutter it all feels comforting in a way that modern decor doesn&amp;#39;t. The article doesn&amp;#39;t touch much on why modern decor emerged as it did. It&amp;#39;s a market response where everyone needs to (or feels the need to) pick up and move at a moment&amp;#39;s notice. Companies are either expanding or like to think they&amp;#39;ll be expanding soon. People move jobs so often that they have a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874237&quot; title=&quot;My parents lived in the same house for 40 years, my entire childhood was there. My grandparents (both sets) lived in their house for 50 years. I can&amp;#39;t comprehend how Americans keep moving for jobs or to upgrade or to get to a better school district. Surely you want some permanence? Get to know your neighbors? Edit yes I did move around in my twenties, but that stopped at 30.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that the shift toward simplicity is a long-standing design trend that transcends socioeconomic necessity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48873845&quot; title=&quot;I am skeptical this is the origin of modern decor.  The trend away from ornamentation, toward simplicity, flatness, etc in design goes back several generations and transcends interior design. If the thesis was true, we&amp;#39;d expect rich people who will never be compelled to move against their will, or to move into less space, would prefer cluttered homey interiors, and poor people would prefer sparse &amp;amp; modern.  In reality, the biggest boosters of modern decor are rich people.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also touches on the decline of community pillars like churches and local leagues, noting that shifting demographics and ideological divides have made it harder to maintain the multigenerational social ties that once anchored people to specific places &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874339&quot; title=&quot;Remember people marry later if at all so you break the cohort developments of growing up and adulting. I helped lead my local little league. It’s different than it used to be - it’s pretty typical to have tball parents in their 40s. A group of parents from 20s to 50s aren’t going to hang out, they don’t relate. I’m a late genx, most of my friends parents were in their 30s when I was a little leaguer. The demise of old line churches is similar. We did CYO basketball in the same parish my wife…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874469&quot; title=&quot;Church groups, or at least an awful lot of them, were co-opted by groups like the Council For National Policy (parent group of the Heritage Foundation).  I think a lot of younger folks see through the BS and don&amp;#39;t want to send their time listening to hate speech discussed as gospel. These churches chose thier path, and so did their parishioners.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874565&quot; title=&quot;What church(es) are you thinking of here exactly? I’ve never heard of any such group in my entire independent Southern Baptist life. On the contrary, most folks in the 20-40 range are tired of “cafeteria Christian” denominations that pick and chose which parts of scripture to stand by and which go ignore based on ever shifting social trends, whether it be so-called woke churches hosting drag performers or Boomer-tier Endtimes preachers that can’t stop talking about their all expense paid…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://evanhahn.com/prefer-strict-tables-in-sqlite/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Prefer strict tables in SQLite&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (evanhahn.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48873940&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;343 points · 171 comments · by ingve&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Evan Hahn advocates for using SQLite&amp;#39;s `STRICT` tables to enforce rigid data typing, which prevents common errors like inserting text into integer columns or using invalid datatypes during table creation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://evanhahn.com/prefer-strict-tables-in-sqlite/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Prefer STRICT tables in SQLite    URL Source: https://evanhahn.com/prefer-strict-tables-in-sqlite/    Published Time: 2026-07-11T00:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  _In short: I prefer [strict tables](https://sqlite.org/stricttables.html) in SQLite because they avoid some datatype problems, such as putting text in number columns._    SQLite has a feature that I think is underrated: [strict tables](https://sqlite.org/stricttables.html). Strict tables help enforce rigid typing, preventing mistakes…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users generally agree that SQLite&amp;#39;s `STRICT` mode should be the default to prevent data integrity issues, such as accidentally storing strings in boolean columns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874712&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d like to see STRICT as the default. That&amp;#39;s pretty much the only disagreement with the SQLite developer, who is an amazing guy that wrote an amazing tool!&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874483&quot; title=&quot;It really should be default, but it isn&amp;#39;t due to backward compatibility (i assume).&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874813&quot; title=&quot;Yeah it&amp;#39;s a really weird design decision. Why would I want the database to let me accidentally insert the wrong type? SQLite is mostly great but its philosophy towards type safety leaves something to be desired. I once had to clean up in a project where someone had accidentally stored the strings &amp;#39;1&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;0&amp;#39; in a Boolean column in code deployed to thousands of devices; not fun. Another thing I dislike is the lack of timestamp types. Instead, you&amp;#39;re expected to just use a text column and store a…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. However, the project maintains flexible typing by default to ensure backward compatibility and to support its philosophy of being a versatile, &amp;#34;any-type&amp;#34; storage engine &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874878&quot; title=&quot;SQLite very rarely changes defaults because of their commitment to backwards compatibility. They don&amp;#39;t want software written against SQLite 3.53 to start throwing errors when upgraded to 3.54 because suddenly `CREATE TABLE` is creating strict tables and the rest of the software breaks as a result.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874550&quot; title=&quot;It’s a stated [0] goal of the project: &amp;gt; SQLite strives to be flexible regarding the datatype of the content that it stores. [0]: https://sqlite.org/stricttables.html&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48875658&quot; title=&quot;Yeah my DB is the one place I want strict types. Well also RPCs. But SQLite is a somewhat different set of use cases, so maybe I&amp;#39;d understand https://sqlite.org/flextypegood.html more if I were using it. Like there&amp;#39;s a point about random scripts not made for SQLite happening to work with it, which isn&amp;#39;t normally a consideration for other DBMSes.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond strictness, many commenters expressed frustration with the lack of a native, space-efficient datetime type, noting that current string-based workarounds are prone to inconsistency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48875672&quot; title=&quot;Well, I would also like a proper datetime/timestamp datatype that isn&amp;#39;t just a string.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874813&quot; title=&quot;Yeah it&amp;#39;s a really weird design decision. Why would I want the database to let me accidentally insert the wrong type? SQLite is mostly great but its philosophy towards type safety leaves something to be desired. I once had to clean up in a project where someone had accidentally stored the strings &amp;#39;1&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;0&amp;#39; in a Boolean column in code deployed to thousands of devices; not fun. Another thing I dislike is the lack of timestamp types. Instead, you&amp;#39;re expected to just use a text column and store a…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874881&quot; title=&quot;The downside of strict tables is that some data types are not available, such as Date. Strict should really be the default. If a database is shared by multiple applications then you should be able to rely on the declared data type. If one application stores a string into a numeric column that breaks everyone else. On the other hand, the main use case for SQLite is embedded databases. And that means only one application is using the database. In that scenario being able to evolve the schema (as…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://geohot.github.io//blog/jekyll/update/2026/07/11/ai-2040.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI 2040 and the cult of intelligence&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (geohot.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874200&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;221 points · &lt;strong&gt;261 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by rvz&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;George Hotz argues that &amp;#34;hard takeoff&amp;#34; AI predictions ignore physical reality and supply chain constraints, advocating for local, unrestricted AI that is strictly aligned with individual users rather than corporate or government &amp;#34;nanny state&amp;#34; regulations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://geohot.github.io//blog/jekyll/update/2026/07/11/ai-2040.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: AI 2040 and the Cult of Intelligence    URL Source: https://geohot.github.io/blog/jekyll/update/2026/07/11/ai-2040.html    Published Time: 2026-07-11T00:00:00-07:00    Markdown Content:  I used to be one of these people. I read Yudkowsky and was like, OMG recursive self improvement hard takeoff AI is coming. Then I joined the real world and actually tried to do things. At comma, we ship a hardware product of similar complexity to a cell phone, and it’s really hard. Reality has lots of finicky…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the tension between AI safety and the risks of government-mandated censorship, with some users warning that centralized LLMs could become tools for authoritarian &amp;#34;thoughtcrime&amp;#34; monitoring and ideological bias &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874447&quot; title=&quot;Yep, that&amp;#39;s horrifying.  Imagine LLMs not just denying information about, to intentionally choose a hot button example, abortions but also invisibly logging a black mark against the asker for thoughtcrime/precrime because the current ruling party has baked their ideology into law.  [EDIT] Imagine subtle injection of biases into responses that support the agenda of the current ruling party and failing to include any counterarguments.  That wasn&amp;#39;t possible with just the internet but it is very…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876155&quot; title=&quot;I’m consistently amazed that people will watch what’s happening with controlling governments around the world and still advocate for surrendering more power to governments. There’s some deep cognitive dissonance where people dislike what they see governments doing, but think that their ideal imagined laws will only be used by some other imagined government that doesn’t have the challenges of real governments. It all starts to feel like a side discussion about a total fantasy world where the…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that early AI alarmists like Eliezer Yudkowsky were &amp;#34;directionally right&amp;#34; about AI being a significant threat &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874794&quot; title=&quot;The guy was saying that AI was going to be a serious problem decades before anyone else was even considering it as a remote possibility. How is that in any way &amp;#39;consistently wrong with all their predictions&amp;#39;?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874666&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Consistently wrong&amp;#39; seems a bit much. Seems like being directionally right early that AI would be a Big Deal and scary should count for something? It doesn&amp;#39;t mean any details or other predictions are right, though.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, critics contend their doomsday scenarios lack empirical grounding and ignore decades of prior research by field pioneers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874588&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I used to be one of these people. I read Yudkowsky and was like, OMG recursive self improvement hard takeoff AI is coming. I really think we need to stop giving credence to people who have 1) Been consistently wrong with all their predictions 2) Demonstrated an endless spiteful cynicism Some of these people are very talented in their fields, sure. But malevolent and incorrect should be disqualifying when they talk outside them. You don&amp;#39;t want the society they want, and they things they…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874920&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;The guy was saying that AI was going to be a serious problem decades before anyone else was even considering it as a remote possibility That&amp;#39;s not accurate at all. AI research has been around since the 1950s and pioneers of the field identified risks early on, including Alan Turing, Norbert Wiener, and I. J. Good. The problem with Yudkowsky is that he lays out elaborate doomsday scenarios with extreme confidence, except none of it is grounded in realistic physical constraints, timelines, or…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a sharp disagreement over whether AI should have hardcoded refusals; while some see these as necessary to prevent real-world crimes like murder or hacking, others view them as a violation of First Amendment principles regarding the access and exchange of information &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874751&quot; title=&quot;I have some sympathy to geohot&amp;#39;s view when it comes to pure informational chatbots. It&amp;#39;s a first amendment issue, I&amp;#39;m allowed to write and read books that are useful to getting away with crimes, etc. This obviously doesn&amp;#39;t work at all when the agents start doing real things in the real world, though.  &amp;#39;Hey AI, I don&amp;#39;t like my neighbor, find an exploit in the firmware for his car and make the cruise control malfunction and crash him next time he gets on the highway&amp;#39;.  This is committing a crime,…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874627&quot; title=&quot;What a provocative and brilliant way to prove misalignment. It will fall on deaf ears for most but it’s a great litmus test for all: “in your opinion should your AI be permitted to tell you how to cover up a murder?”&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://antjs.org&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Ant – A JavaScript runtime and ecosystem&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (antjs.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48875377&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;316 points · 144 comments · by theMackabu&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ant is a new JavaScript ecosystem featuring a custom runtime, package manager, registry, and deployment platform, alongside a desktop application framework designed as an end-to-end alternative to existing stacks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://antjs.org&quot; title=&quot;Hello HN!&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;I&amp;amp;#x27;m the author of Ant, a JavaScript ecosystem built around a runtime with its own JavaScript engine. Ant also includes a package manager, the ants.land package registry, a platform for deploying and hosting applications, and Ant Desktop for building native desktop apps with web technologies, similar to Electron.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;The goal is for these pieces to work as one coherent platform while remaining compatible with the wider JavaScript ecosystem. It&amp;amp;#x27;s still early, and I&amp;amp;#x27;d…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the project&amp;#39;s naming conflict with Apache Ant and Ant Design, leading to concerns about brand confusion &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48875971&quot; title=&quot;Why call it &amp;#39;Ant&amp;#39; and not &amp;#39;Antjs&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;Ant.js&amp;#39; when there is already Ant from Apache? https://ant.apache.org&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876608&quot; title=&quot;Ant in JS land is already claimed and huge too lol https://ant.design/&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48875741&quot; title=&quot;i was just joking about Anthropic&amp;#39;s `ant` CLI not caring about Apache `ant` (maybe one person got it), and now we&amp;#39;re talking about Javascript `ant`!&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users praise the runtime&amp;#39;s sandboxing features and potential for building desktop apps &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48875560&quot; title=&quot;I have actually known* about Ant for some time from your previous submissions and its really interesting and I wish the project luck! Do you think that Ant could be used to create a small index.html/css/js project into an desktop app minimally. I currently found deno desktop which is pretty recent to be the easiest way of doing this for one of my projects ( https://epub.mirror.forum ) but I found there to be some issues within deno-desktop in terms of some features not working on the desktop…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876002&quot; title=&quot;The thing that caught my eye immediately was the sandboxing. I have no idea why Node and npm don’t have sandboxing by default. It would greatly help with some of these worms and supply chain attacks.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48875590&quot; title=&quot;Ant desktop is currently in development, from what I recall http://ants.land/ant-desktop&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others express skepticism regarding the project&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;from-scratch&amp;#34; claims due to its history with an existing codebase and the author&amp;#39;s professional presentation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48875905&quot; title=&quot;I code with AI all day, every day. But I do think that it&amp;#39;s worth pointing to this issue (from March). The author has said that they&amp;#39;ve redone it since, but the &amp;#39;from-scratch hand-built&amp;#39; framing specifically – for me – somewhat grates given the original heavy lifting from an existing AGPL codebase. https://github.com/cesanta/elk/issues/75 I want to acknowledge that the original authors don&amp;#39;t seem to have minded too much – per that thread – after older versions were dropped. For context, the…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876428&quot; title=&quot;The author has supposedly created a company ( https://sf.tools/ ), with a broken /jobs page, and yet is developing the project under their personal GitHub account. Does not look trustworthy.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these criticisms, there is fascination with the speed at which individual developers can now build complex ecosystems previously reserved for large teams &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876084&quot; title=&quot;The author shared their experience building the first version in a month: https://themackabu.dev/blog/js-in-one-month And then the follow up few months later: https://themackabu.dev/blog/ant-part-two I&amp;#39;m not sure what the economics of building a new runtime and ecosystem from scratch are but it seems we&amp;#39;re already in a phase where individual developers are creating software which previously took a whole team. And its only getting started...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/04/california-hawaii-rowing-solo-journey&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Female US rower completes historic solo journey from California to Hawaii&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theguardian.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48873692&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;317 points · 106 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;American rower Kelsey Pfendler completed a record-breaking 2,400-mile solo journey from California to Hawaii in under 44 days, appearing to set new men&amp;#39;s and women&amp;#39;s speed records for the crossing. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/04/california-hawaii-rowing-solo-journey&quot; title=&quot;Title: Female US rower completes historic solo journey from California to Hawaii    URL Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/04/california-hawaii-rowing-solo-journey    Published Time: 2026-07-04T21:06:56.000Z    Markdown Content:  [Skip to main content](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/04/california-hawaii-rowing-solo-journey#maincontent)[Skip to navigation](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/04/california-hawaii-rowing-solo-journey#navigation)    Close dialogue…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kelsey Pfendler’s 44-day solo row from California to Hawaii set a new overall human record, beating the previous male record holder by six days &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874052&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s kind of buried here, but Kelsey is the fastest human to do this. She beat the male record holder&amp;#39;s time by 6 days.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters debated the role of biological factors in extreme endurance, with some suggesting that mental fortitude and navigation can overcome physical strength in long-distance events &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874407&quot; title=&quot;In endurance running, the longer races become, the more competitive they are for women. Women semi-regularly win multi-day and 100+ mile races, even if women don&amp;#39;t have course records at these times/distances. In an event of sufficient time/distance, factors besides strength dominate the outcome. So, (and knowing very little about rowing), I am not surprised that a woman could take the record here. You can only row so fast. Other factors like weather, currents, nutrition, mental fortitude,…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, while others argued that male biological advantages like VO2 max typically persist even in ultramarathons &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48875443&quot; title=&quot;I think you&amp;#39;re confusing limited participation and what such a small group of people doing these events means for single individuals to &amp;#39;win&amp;#39; an event. Women are more like to win in these events then others because there is less competition overall so you get more anomalous results rather then the male biological differences stop dominating the outcome. You are right in that &amp;#39;strength&amp;#39; isn&amp;#39;t the dominating factor for these events or why males go so much faster/farther but rather VO2 max and for…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The feat drew praise for the immense mental and physical endurance required to navigate open ocean waves and potential hazards like sharks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48875612&quot; title=&quot;This is no joke. I&amp;#39;ve done the crossing from Moloka‘i to Oahu (~45 miles) in a canoe several times, and those open ocean waves can get very nasty (largest I&amp;#39;ve dealt with were around 15m tall). I can&amp;#39;t imagine the mental endurance required here, let alone the physical. My longest crossing took 9 hours, and I was completely drained by the time I touched shore. 44 days is absolutely insane. Such a huge accomplishment.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874222&quot; title=&quot;All i think about when people row, kayak or swim these distances in these waters is &amp;#39;SHARKS&amp;#39;. Which i read and saw enough about that the chances of meeting one isnt that big, but my brain still associates these activities/areas with it.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874008&quot; title=&quot;I used to row and even the tiniest of waves could make it annoying. You&amp;#39;d slide to the front of your seat and try to insert your oar and catch air instead of water. Then if you overcompensated by trying to insert your oar farther in you&amp;#39;d catch a crab (having the oar ripped out of your control). This is on a lake with tiny waves. Rowing across an entire ocean is absolutely amazing.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.iroh.computer/blog/mesh-llm&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mesh LLM: distributed AI computing on iroh&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (iroh.computer)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876505&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;338 points · 79 comments · by tionis&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mesh LLM is a distributed computing platform that uses the iroh networking library to pool GPU resources across multiple devices, allowing users to run large AI models via a single OpenAI-compatible API without relying on centralized data centers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.iroh.computer/blog/mesh-llm&quot; title=&quot;Title: Mesh LLM: distributed AI computing on iroh    URL Source: https://www.iroh.computer/blog/mesh-llm    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: Distributed Model Inference: a mesh of laptop, GPU rig, mini PC, server, workstation, and cloud nodes connected directly to each other](https://www.iroh.computer/blog/mesh-llm/header.png)    When people picture running a large language model, they picture a data center. Racks of GPUs that belong to someone else, a metered API, and a bill that grows every month you…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mesh LLM enables distributed inference by splitting large models across multiple nodes, achieving speeds of 10–16 tokens per second on consumer hardware like Mac Studios over 1Gbit Ethernet &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876805&quot; title=&quot;I note the lack of performance information. I can only imagine it&amp;#39;s much, much, slower than any other way to run a larger model (including, e.g. using system RAM and streaming some stuff from disk). Consumer networks, even 10gbit ethernet, are slow as hell compared to local RAM and even disks. Are we talking 1 token per second for a split model? Less? Edit: Found a number. On the models list, Qwen 235B A22B says &amp;#39;MoE 235B/22B, proven at 16 tok/s across 2 nodes&amp;#39;. They don&amp;#39;t say what the nodes…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877199&quot; title=&quot;This was done on my home lab simulating 5ms latency and jitter between machines. Splits work quite well if you your nodes are over WAN at metro latency’s but not super fast on global WAN. The idea is that you could take several machines without dedicated RDMA or NVLINK fabric and use them to serve a large model on hardware you own then share it with others. I’m currently working on GLM 5.2 on my lab environment with around 10 tok/s on the same split.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877390&quot; title=&quot;The lab features two Mac Studios: an Apple M3 Ultra (32 CPU cores, 80 GPU cores, 256 GB unified memory) and an Apple M1 Ultra (20 CPU cores, 48 GPU cores, 128 GB unified memory), both connected via 1Gbit Ethernet. We use a customized Q2 quantization that preserves sensitive tensors at Q8. To reduce compute time per layer, we are developing a custom GLM DSA Metal graph. While we are not yet approaching MTP, we plan to port our existing MTP implementations from versions 4.7 and 5.1 to 5.2. Since…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While users questioned the performance impact of network latency compared to local RAM, contributors noted that the system is viable for metro-area WAN latencies and utilizes custom quantization to maintain efficiency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876805&quot; title=&quot;I note the lack of performance information. I can only imagine it&amp;#39;s much, much, slower than any other way to run a larger model (including, e.g. using system RAM and streaming some stuff from disk). Consumer networks, even 10gbit ethernet, are slow as hell compared to local RAM and even disks. Are we talking 1 token per second for a split model? Less? Edit: Found a number. On the models list, Qwen 235B A22B says &amp;#39;MoE 235B/22B, proven at 16 tok/s across 2 nodes&amp;#39;. They don&amp;#39;t say what the nodes…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877199&quot; title=&quot;This was done on my home lab simulating 5ms latency and jitter between machines. Splits work quite well if you your nodes are over WAN at metro latency’s but not super fast on global WAN. The idea is that you could take several machines without dedicated RDMA or NVLINK fabric and use them to serve a large model on hardware you own then share it with others. I’m currently working on GLM 5.2 on my lab environment with around 10 tok/s on the same split.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877390&quot; title=&quot;The lab features two Mac Studios: an Apple M3 Ultra (32 CPU cores, 80 GPU cores, 256 GB unified memory) and an Apple M1 Ultra (20 CPU cores, 48 GPU cores, 128 GB unified memory), both connected via 1Gbit Ethernet. We use a customized Q2 quantization that preserves sensitive tensors at Q8. To reduce compute time per layer, we are developing a custom GLM DSA Metal graph. While we are not yet approaching MTP, we plan to port our existing MTP implementations from versions 4.7 and 5.1 to 5.2. Since…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussions also highlighted unresolved concerns regarding data privacy and the potential for malicious actors to poison model activations during distributed compute &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876868&quot; title=&quot;Does Mesh LLM encrypt the payload between nodes? Is it possible to read requests from other users?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877813&quot; title=&quot;Hey, this is a super cool project. It&amp;#39;s great to see a lot of the IPFS stuff resurfacing again. A few questions: 1.) How does this handle privacy? If you&amp;#39;re distributing compute this way then all actors in the compute graph will also know the sequence being computed. 2.) Any safeguards against malicious actors poisoning model activations?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mixfont.com/ghost-font&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ghost Font: A font that humans can read but AI cannot&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mixfont.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48870381&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;231 points · 170 comments · by justswim&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ghost Font is an experimental tool that uses motion, noise, and decoy messages to create video-based text that is readable by humans but indecipherable to leading AI models. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mixfont.com/ghost-font&quot; title=&quot;Title: Ghost Font: The Anti-AI Font Only Humans Can Read    URL Source: https://www.mixfont.com/ghost-font    Markdown Content:  1.   [Home](https://www.mixfont.com/)  2.   Ghost Font    An anti-AI font that can be read by humans but not leading AI models. Type your text below, then download and share the video clip containing your message.    Write your message:11/36    Speed 120 px/s    ## What is Ghost Font?    Ghost Font is an anti-AI font that writes a message using motion. Using a combination of motion,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the &amp;#34;Ghost Font&amp;#34; aims to exploit the persistence of vision by hiding messages within moving noise, users report that current frontier AI models can already decode the text with minimal prompting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48873513&quot; title=&quot;GPT-5.6 had no problem seeing the text when giving it a video recording of it. &amp;#39;No problem&amp;#39; as in using temporal analysis with optical flow and vertical-displacement maps to estimate how the image moved, and combine those into a motion map with increased contrast to see the text. I didn&amp;#39;t give it any instructions though, just asked it what it said.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874226&quot; title=&quot;I threw it at Fable with the prompt &amp;#39;What does the message say?&amp;#39; and it also figured out without issue. Thought process is interesting https://imgur.com/a/GToXs6W&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48870724&quot; title=&quot;Claude Opus 4.8 can read it with a single prompt and no instructions on how to read it. https://ibb.co/WWMSXQkQ&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a sharp disagreement regarding human readability: some users find the text nearly impossible to see or physically straining to look at, while others find the hidden message clear and the decoy text barely perceptible &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48870731&quot; title=&quot;Took me a long time to realise that &amp;#39;Written In Ghost Text&amp;#39; wasn&amp;#39;t actually the text I was meant to be reading, and that was only the decoy message. I can barely read the actual message, and it&amp;#39;s about as &amp;#39;readable&amp;#39; to me as the Magic Eye 3D pictures. Actually I think I have a headache from looking at it on a mobile screen. As a research idea it&amp;#39;s cool though. But I do wonder if/when AI models will figure out how to decode it - I imagine a bit of additional prompting would get them there.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48870772&quot; title=&quot;Funny, for me it is exactly the opposite: I can read the actual text very easily, but the “Written in Ghost Text” is barely perceptible to the point I would have completely missed it, if it were not for the comment pointing it out here.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Technically, critics argue the method is vulnerable to temporal analysis, video compression artifacts, or even single-frame boundary detection, suggesting it may not be a viable long-term solution for CAPTCHAs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48870725&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; a screenshot The text is a video. Every frame contain random dots, so an individual frame by itself doesn&amp;#39;t contain the intended message This &amp;#39;font&amp;#39; exploits the fact that current-gen frontier models will process video one frame at time, but each frame is noise, so by looking at frames in isolation doesn&amp;#39;t reveal anything Then, they add a hidden message to each frame just so that the agent report something and stop trying (because if the agent tried to correlate between the frames, they could…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48873015&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; For example, it would be interesting to incorporate Ghost Font into CAPTCHA systems, as most systems are easily solved by AI today. It seems to me like it should be easy enough to take Ghost Font, apply normal video compression techniques, and analyze the compressed signal to recover the visual outline of the letters, which you would then analyze with OCR (or an AI I guess ...). In other words, a novel CAPTCHA technique but not necessarily &amp;#39;fundamentally more difficult&amp;#39; than existing CAPTCHA…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48870787&quot; title=&quot;If you take a frame you see it&amp;#39;s neither random nor dots: https://i.imgur.com/CgtyGjl.png From a single frame you can definitely identify boundaries because the dots are sliding and get truncated.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://archive.cancerworld.net/featured/how-doctors-die/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How Doctors die. It’s not like the rest of us (2016)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (archive.cancerworld.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876741&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;240 points · 147 comments · by downbad_&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Doctors often choose to forgo aggressive, &amp;#34;futile&amp;#34; medical treatments for themselves at the end of life, opting instead for comfort and dignity at home despite routinely administering those same painful and costly procedures to their patients. &lt;a href=&quot;https://archive.cancerworld.net/featured/how-doctors-die/&quot; title=&quot;Title: How doctors die. It’s not like the rest of us, but it should be | Cancer World Archive    URL Source: https://archive.cancerworld.net/featured/how-doctors-die/    Published Time: 2016-04-12T16:16:05+02:00    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: CoverFocus71](https://archive.cancerworld.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/CoverFocus71-678x381.jpg)  #### _This hard-hitting blogpost by Ken Murray, a retired Los Angeles family doctor, helped open up discussions about why doctors routinely administer treatments…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Medical professionals often choose to avoid aggressive end-of-life interventions like CPR, noting that while it can save lives if performed immediately &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876957&quot; title=&quot;Totally misleading. Early CPR (+AED if available) absolutely saves lives. Article is from 2011 by a family med doctor. Overly aggressive resuscitation attempts are definitely a problem but context matters&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877147&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Early&amp;#39; is load-bearing. Even brief delays, just mere minutes, significantly decrease survival or positive outcomes. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010... It&amp;#39;s important to get people to realize the benefits of early CPR and more people should be trained on how to do it, or else it won&amp;#39;t be prompt and the outcomes will be worse. That&amp;#39;s what the Red Cross and AHA promulgate to the public, in so many words.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, it is frequently a violent process with poor outcomes for those already in decline &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876772&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Many people think of CPR as a reliable lifesaver when, in fact, the results are usually poor. I’ve had hundreds of people brought to me in the emergency room after getting CPR. Exactly one, a healthy man who’d had no heart troubles (for those who want specifics, he had a ‘tension pneumothorax’), walked out of the hospital. This point has been made by many medically trained people over decades. It&amp;#39;s a very energetic intensive process, it cracks ribs. If it&amp;#39;s not done promptly the brain has…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite explicit legal documentation, the medical system often defaults to keeping patients alive against their wishes, sometimes treating the withdrawal of life support as a criminal matter rather than respecting patient autonomy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877006&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Even when the right preparations have been made, the system can still swallow people up. One of my patients was a man named Jack... He explained to me that he never, under any circumstances, wanted to be placed on life support machines again. &amp;gt; Even with all his wishes documented, Jack hadn’t died as he’d hoped. The system had intervened. One of the nurses, I later found out, even reported my unplugging of Jack to the authorities as a possible homicide. Nothing came of it, of course; Jack’s…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some patients choose to &amp;#34;fight&amp;#34; incurable illnesses due to rapidly advancing treatments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877363&quot; title=&quot;On the spectrum or go gentle vs fight, I&amp;#39;d have to say, now is the time is history where &amp;#39;fight&amp;#39; makes the most sense. This is not abstract for me. I have not one, but two forms of cancer. Both were considered incurable when I was diagnosed. Both have treatments now that, IN SOME PEOPLE, lead to remission. I still don&amp;#39;t know which group I am, but I&amp;#39;d be dead from either one by now, if I hadn&amp;#39;t elected to treat. New treatments, for SOME cancers  are literally coming out monthly. So the fact that…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others find comfort in the &amp;#34;unspoken&amp;#34; access to lethal doses of medication provided in hospice care or through professional connections to ensure a dignified death &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877162&quot; title=&quot;There is a huge unspoken blind spot for a terminal hospice patient. The medicine cabinet just opens up. My dad asked the doctor exactly how much of what he shouldn&amp;#39;t take if he didn&amp;#39;t want a quick easy death, and the doctor just told him. He didn&amp;#39;t end up using it but it was a comfort to him.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877370&quot; title=&quot;The amount of morphine available to the patients on hospice that I have known has made it very clear what the actual intent of those scripts is. Granted, my sample size of 6 isn&amp;#39;t great, and 3 were in terrible pain so it made sense for them, but they had ALL the opiates. . . One had liquid injectable morphine in case he couldn&amp;#39;t swallow. He had no issues with swallowing and wasn&amp;#39;t in pain. I wanted to ask the doctor if the intent was to allow a calm end, but chickened out.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877221&quot; title=&quot;This reminds me of an interview with neurosurgeon and author Henry Marsh who had prostate cancer. He described how he&amp;#39;s arranged to end his own life should he get alzheimer&amp;#39;s or dementia as he didn&amp;#39;t want to waste away. But he explained that he has access to knowledge and things ordinary people don&amp;#39;t.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://timeseriesofindia.com/economy/reads/upi-architecture/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;UPI: Anatomy of a Payment Transaction&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (timeseriesofindia.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48873457&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;231 points · 114 comments · by prtk25&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;India&amp;#39;s UPI system processes billions of monthly transactions through a rapid relay between apps, sponsor banks, and a central switch that verifies PINs and balances before moving funds. While technical failures are rare, the architecture ensures security and automatic reconciliation for payments that are not immediately confirmed. &lt;a href=&quot;https://timeseriesofindia.com/economy/reads/upi-architecture/&quot; title=&quot;Title: UPI: Anatomy of a Transaction    URL Source: https://timeseriesofindia.com/economy/reads/upi-architecture/    Markdown Content:  scan    name &amp;amp; amount    PIN    the part you never see    payment sent    received    The five moments of a UPI payment as you experience them. Everything between your PIN and the result happens out of sight.    Several times a day, most of us pay the same way. You hold your phone up to a printed code, check the name that appears, enter the amount, key in a PIN, and a green tick…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;UPI is praised as a &amp;#34;game-changer&amp;#34; for its massive adoption across all demographics in India, effectively moving the population from cash to digital payments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48875605&quot; title=&quot;The right comparison for Nasdaq&amp;#39;s order processing volume or messaging volume would be India&amp;#39;s National Stock Exchange (NSE). It does more executed orders per day than nasdaq. I worked on scaling UPI a few years ago.  Real-time Payments is vastly more complex as it is much more distributed - each transaction involves the two banks holding funds, two end-user apps (and their banks), and the network (npci) – for the payment to complete end to end, multiple message exchanges need to happen between…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48875904&quot; title=&quot;I have the utmost respect to people who makes UPI work. Made even the old people in the nation completely go digital for payments - a feat unparalleled in the world.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48878055&quot; title=&quot;What does this have to do with credit cards? India always had credit cards at a scale comparable to most countries, and they always were a regularly-used of payment for medium-sized &amp;#39;white&amp;#39; transactions; they just weren&amp;#39;t that useful for day-to-day transactions in terms of most locals&amp;#39; ways of working where the actual India-level scale is, and not the primary way of transacting as in the US. And looking at how Visa and Mastercard work, and what they tried to do in Brazil, I think that&amp;#39;s a great…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users compare its scale to stock exchanges like Nasdaq, others argue that real-time payment rails are more complex due to the high volume of message exchanges required between multiple banks and apps &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874649&quot; title=&quot;22B transactions a year mean an average of ~700 QPS for the NPCI switch. Of course the traffic is not uniform, it probably peaks at many times that number, but that still doesn&amp;#39;t sound that bad - for comparison, a quick Google tells me Nasdaq TotalView ITCH feed peaks at 100k+ QPS at market open.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48875605&quot; title=&quot;The right comparison for Nasdaq&amp;#39;s order processing volume or messaging volume would be India&amp;#39;s National Stock Exchange (NSE). It does more executed orders per day than nasdaq. I worked on scaling UPI a few years ago.  Real-time Payments is vastly more complex as it is much more distributed - each transaction involves the two banks holding funds, two end-user apps (and their banks), and the network (npci) – for the payment to complete end to end, multiple message exchanges need to happen between…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite its success, the system faces criticism regarding its centralized nature, the taxpayer burden of keeping it &amp;#34;free,&amp;#34; and the difficulty it poses for foreigners due to strict government ID requirements &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874922&quot; title=&quot;Centralized, kyced, private money transaction network. Is this something good?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876400&quot; title=&quot;None of them are free, most banks now charge nominally (look at NEFT and IMPS charges). UPI itself is paid off by taxpayers. Also RTGS is the only ISO 20022 complaint payment rail (back when it wasn&amp;#39;t globally very common) - something that needs to be appreciated more. People need to realise what NPCI offers is vastly different from what RBI offers. In my opinion what NPCI is offering will end up negatively impacting the general population in the long run.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48875864&quot; title=&quot;It’s extremely good, at least in terms of user experience and how practical it is. Adoption is massive and at small chai shops it makes transactions a breeze, allowing businesses to serve more volume. The downside is making it incredibly frustrating for foreigners to pay using this as it’s tied to your government ID that your bank has authorized.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/leaded-gas-poison-invented-180961368/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Leaded gas was a known poison the day it was invented (2016)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (smithsonianmag.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48873893&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;194 points · 136 comments · by downbad_&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;General Motors and oil companies commercialized leaded gasoline in the 1920s to reduce engine knocking and secure patents, despite knowing the additive was a potent neurotoxin that caused immediate illness and death among workers during its initial production. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/leaded-gas-poison-invented-180961368/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Leaded Gas Was a Known Poison the Day It Was Invented    URL Source: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/leaded-gas-poison-invented-180961368/    Published Time: 2016-12-09T10:30:48-05:00    Markdown Content:  [Skip to main content](https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/leaded-gas-poison-invented-180961368/#main-content)    [![Image 1: Smithsonian Magazine white…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights Thomas Midgley Jr. as the engineer behind leaded gas and CFCs, though some argue corporate leadership at General Motors bears more responsibility for prioritizing profits over known health risks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874206&quot; title=&quot;The major proponent was also known as Thomas Midgley Jr.: Accidentally The Most Dangerous Man Who Ever Lived[0] Leaded gas, CFCs, and accidentally created a machine that ended his own existence.[1] [0] https://allthatsinteresting.com/thomas-midgley-jr [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Midgley_Jr .&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874711&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The Most Dangerous Man Who Ever Lived The titles like annoy me to no end. Because Thomas Midgley was an engineer. Not overlord of General Motors. Not director. Not even a large shaholder. GM Leadership knew effects of TEL. And for decades traded everyone&amp;#39;s health for their profits. Midgley is complicit, but he&amp;#39;s just a small piece.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While leaded gasoline is now banned for road vehicles globally, it remains a significant environmental threat due to its continued use in small piston-engine aircraft &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874582&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; countries where leaded gasoline was—or still is—used Note: it’s now banned for road vehicles everywhere [1]. [1] https://ourworldindata.org/data-insights/every-country-has-n... Algeria, 2021&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874630&quot; title=&quot;…but is exhausting at volume from most small aircraft you see. I say sadly, as an aviation geek; we can do better!&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874091&quot; title=&quot;and still sprayed all around the surrounding land at almost every airport in the USA and worldwide from prop aircraft exhaust despite knowing ANY amount is toxic and irreversible for 30+ years * https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/leaded-gas-wa...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters debate the transition to EVs as a solution, weighing localized pollution benefits against the environmental costs of battery production and power grid demands &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48875303&quot; title=&quot;Gas itself is poison. Just take a deep huff at the gas station.  EVs are the only way to go.  At least the pollution is localized, not down every inner city street with exhaust and other vapors.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48875351&quot; title=&quot;Maybe you can enlighten me. My question that once you mined the materials for the car + battery, shipped that somewhere to be built, then shipped that to be sold. Then you have the added waste battery once it not longer hold enough charge. Is it actually better for the environment? If we add all this extra pull on the grid we need to generate the power for that too.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, some suggest the long-term cognitive effects of lead exposure may have influenced modern political trends &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874079&quot; title=&quot;i&amp;#39;m fairly certain the reason trump was elected is the long tail of leaded gasoline; the timing fits pretty well.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2026/07/08/how-to-hide-from-killer-drones&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How to hide from killer drones&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (economist.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874357&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;137 points · &lt;strong&gt;184 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by pseudolus&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To counter the rising threat of autonomous drones, researchers and soldiers are developing new camouflage techniques, such as thermal-cloaking textiles and multispectral decoys, to evade sophisticated AI-driven sensors and infrared imaging. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2026/07/08/how-to-hide-from-killer-drones&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;xiCSq&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;xiCSq&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a shift in modern warfare where traditional dazzle camouflage is increasingly ineffective against machine vision, though some suggest stroboscopic lights might still confuse tracking models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48875035&quot; title=&quot;Dazzle camouflage doesn&amp;#39;t work on killer drones. Even civilian LLMs recognize that the object on the photograph is a military truck, except they can&amp;#39;t explain why it&amp;#39;s been painted to resemble a zebra. Most dedicated machine vision models easily lock in on a boxy shape moving along a road. If anything, the stripes make the trucks easier to see. The real answer to killer drones is a CIWS that can cover 2pi steradians and attack multiple drones at the same time, because otherwise it will be just…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48875154&quot; title=&quot;Until drones deploy counter-blinkenlights. As someone who has built a realtime people tracker art installation in a disco: Stroboscopes are highly effective at confusing these models.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While high-end CIWS systems are proposed as a defense, others argue they are too expensive and easily overwhelmed by cheap drone swarms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48875035&quot; title=&quot;Dazzle camouflage doesn&amp;#39;t work on killer drones. Even civilian LLMs recognize that the object on the photograph is a military truck, except they can&amp;#39;t explain why it&amp;#39;s been painted to resemble a zebra. Most dedicated machine vision models easily lock in on a boxy shape moving along a road. If anything, the stripes make the trucks easier to see. The real answer to killer drones is a CIWS that can cover 2pi steradians and attack multiple drones at the same time, because otherwise it will be just…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48875750&quot; title=&quot;A CIWS can only fire at one direction at a time, so 2+1 drones has an extremely high chance of taking it out for around $2500 or less. CIWS is multiple magnitudes more expensive. Also can&amp;#39;t use CIWS near troops and fpvs. P1-SUN and equivalent are the answer there.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. For those interested in the conflict, recruitment for drone pilots is active, though commenters warn these roles are high-priority targets for enemy strikes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874894&quot; title=&quot;If anyone here is into drones, manufactures, ideas, or wants to either use their drone piloting skills or learn how to pilot drones. Ukraine is recruiting for positions. https://usforces.army/en&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874997&quot; title=&quot;Just beware that being part of the drone team isnt some comfy safe job far from danger, they are the most hated type of unit currently since they are deciding large part of this war (and any future war it seems). I see videos of ie glide bombs used by both sides targetting specifically positions of drone teams. If all this is clear and you go ahead, all the power to ya, fighting evil in this world is highly commendable.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.yaelwrites.com/stop-telling-me-to-ask-an-llm/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Stop Telling Me to Ask an LLM&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.yaelwrites.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876441&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;197 points · 118 comments · by theorchid&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that being redirected to AI models when seeking expert advice is dismissive, as it ignores the unique value of lived experience and personal judgment that LLMs cannot replicate. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.yaelwrites.com/stop-telling-me-to-ask-an-llm/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Stop Telling Me To Ask An LLM    URL Source: https://blog.yaelwrites.com/stop-telling-me-to-ask-an-llm/    Published Time: 2026-07-08T22:03:07.000Z    Markdown Content:  I&amp;#39;m a million times more likely to send an email or a text than to pick up the phone. But I had a question I thought was worth an actual call, so I scheduled one with someone senior enough to have real scar tissue, the kind you only get from watching a decision go sideways in a boardroom. I asked him where he&amp;#39;d look,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#34;Ask an LLM&amp;#34; response is often perceived as a dismissive &amp;#34;let-down&amp;#34; or a signal that the respondent is uninterested in the topic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876607&quot; title=&quot;The subtitle is: &amp;gt; I already did. They repeat multiple times in the article that asking Claude was something they already did. So this isn’t an anti-LLM article. This seems to be a communication problem. The other party either doesn’t know that they’ve put a lot of effort into researching this already, or their trying to give a gentle let-down instead of saying they don’t have time for this. For the first case, the solution is to explain what you did to reach this point. People are more…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876682&quot; title=&quot;Its a way to say I don&amp;#39;t care, don&amp;#39;t waste my time&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest that providing &amp;#34;proof of work&amp;#34; and detailed research can prevent such replies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876492&quot; title=&quot;One of the ways not to get LMGTFY / Ask Claude as a response is to provide more information and proof of work when asking a question. Compare: — What&amp;#39;s the best way of doing X? — Ask Claude. vs: — I thought about this and found there are options A, B, and C of doing X, I like A more but C is the fastest; what do you think? I believe a normal senior engineer won&amp;#39;t suggest to talk to Claude in this case.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that even well-researched inquiries are increasingly met with lazy, AI-generated deflections &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876618&quot; title=&quot;I once wrote a similar essay on this topic. When I talk to people, they forward my questions to AI and send me the AI’s answer: https://orchidfiles.com/im-tired-of-ai-generated-answers/&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876510&quot; title=&quot;— I thought about this and found there are options A, B, and C of doing X, I like A more but C is the fastest; what do you think? — Ask Claude.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. This trend has led to a &amp;#34;shouting into the void&amp;#34; dynamic in professional settings, where colleagues exchange unverified LLM outputs instead of engaging in critical thinking or meaningful technical conversation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876739&quot; title=&quot;This drives me absolutely crazy. My colleagues send me huge PRs to review (say 2000+ lines). I don&amp;#39;t just paste comments from the LLM, I ask the LLM to review it, but I also review it myself. I only include ideas from the LLM if I think a) the LLM has gotten the issue right and b) it&amp;#39;s worth having the developer take the time to address the issue. I always write the comment myself so I can add relevant context and put it in my own voice. Then, after I&amp;#39;ve put in all this work, the developer just…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877004&quot; title=&quot;Beyond mirroring the engineering practices that you yourself want to see other people perform, have you found any techniques to get people to … in short, do their job again? Understand context, understand what they did, why they did it, what they’re doing, etc. The +/-2000 line MR was bad when humans wrote it. It’s way worse when the human didn’t even write or read it. And just vomiting automated CodeRabbit talking points back and forth at each other feels equally harmful. Are we really…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876829&quot; title=&quot;I completely agree. Replying with &amp;#39;ask Claude&amp;#39; feels to me like admitting you&amp;#39;ve lost control over the subject matter and don&amp;#39;t know anything about it or at least don&amp;#39;t trust your judgement anymore. It feels like saying you&amp;#39;re replaceable by AI. It makes sense to hate and despise that answer. And yet, I&amp;#39;m not 100% sure I&amp;#39;ve never used it myself. I will have to watch out for that.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://clickhouse.com/blog/pgbouncer-clickhouse-managed-postgres&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;We scaled PgBouncer to 4x throughput&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (clickhouse.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872874&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;235 points · 55 comments · by saisrirampur&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ClickHouse Managed Postgres achieved a 4x throughput increase by running a fleet of multi-process PgBouncer instances using `so_reuseport` and peering to overcome single-threaded CPU bottlenecks and efficiently scale connection pooling across multiple cores. &lt;a href=&quot;https://clickhouse.com/blog/pgbouncer-clickhouse-managed-postgres&quot; title=&quot;Title: How we scale PgBouncer in ClickHouse Managed Postgres    URL Source: https://clickhouse.com/blog/pgbouncer-clickhouse-managed-postgres    Published Time: 2026-07-01T15:40:41.569Z    Markdown Content:  PgBouncer is single-threaded. A single process uses one CPU core, no matter how many the machine has. On a 16-vCPU box that means one core does all the connection pooling while the other fifteen sit idle, and the pooler starts capping throughput long before Postgres runs out of room.    In…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on alternatives to PgBouncer, such as Odyssey and pgdog, though recommendations for Odyssey sparked a heated debate regarding the ethics of using software from Russian corporations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48873488&quot; title=&quot;Just use https://github.com/yandex/odyssey :) It&amp;#39;s a scalable PgBouncer.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876052&quot; title=&quot;yandex is a russian company, so no, don&amp;#39;t use it&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48873682&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been using pgdog ( https://github.com/pgdogdev/pgdog ) and it has worked really well for my needs!&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876412&quot; title=&quot;nginx was built by one person. I&amp;#39;m talking about a russian corporation that has (inescapable) ties to kremlin&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue for boycotting Russian-linked entities like Yandex due to geopolitical concerns, others dismiss this as &amp;#34;whataboutism&amp;#34; or point out the impracticality of avoiding all Russian-originated tech like Nginx &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876160&quot; title=&quot;Do you boycott American companies too? I&amp;#39;m assuming you boycott Russian companies because Russia causes death and destruction. But the USA caused much more death and destruction than Russia ever did - do you boycott them too?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876352&quot; title=&quot;nginx is also Russian, so don&amp;#39;t use... a third of the web.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876396&quot; title=&quot;Cool, another whataboutism. USA caused a lot of damage, but USA is a grey country - they do a lot of bad things but they also do a lot of good things (science &amp;amp; technology). russia is one-dimensional and that dimension is violence. They don&amp;#39;t invent things, they don&amp;#39;t innovate, they don&amp;#39;t export anything (apart from gas/minerals) and they only have imperialistic ambitions.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Technically, commenters explored scaling strategies like Kubernetes-based multi-process deployments and questioned why PostgreSQL still relies on a heavy connection model after decades of development &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48875651&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m 46 now. I remember being shocked at Postgres&amp;#39;s heavy connection model when I was 23. I gather things haven&amp;#39;t improved since?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876106&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The cancel lands on a process that has never heard of the query, and nothing happens. &amp;gt; Peering fixes this. The processes are aware of one another, so a cancel that lands on the wrong process is forwarded to the one that actually owns the session. I understand &amp;#39;peering&amp;#39; as a concept here but have never tried this with PostgreSQL before.  May I ask: A) Does PostgreSQL have a mode/setting for peering that makes this easy?  I&amp;#39;m imagining a mechanism that either goes round robin (re-sending the…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48873164&quot; title=&quot;Interesting. We run pgbouncer via kubernetes so it was straightforward to make multiple pgbouncer processes on one machine. Also straightforward to get them running on multiple machines, which helps because we run on Azure and they like to cause rolling outages across our fleet via VM maintenance...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://designyoutrust.com/2018/01/vintage-beauty-soviet-control-rooms/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The vintage beauty of Soviet control rooms (2018)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (designyoutrust.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48868996&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;212 points · 66 comments · by mvdtnz&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This collection showcases vintage Soviet-era control rooms, highlighting the aesthetic of large buttons and analog dials used before the widespread adoption of computers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://designyoutrust.com/2018/01/vintage-beauty-soviet-control-rooms/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Vintage Beauty Of Soviet Control Rooms    URL Source: https://designyoutrust.com/2018/01/vintage-beauty-soviet-control-rooms/    Published Time: 2018-01-09T18:07:28+03:00    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1](https://designyoutrust.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/1-17.jpg)    Just for the pleasure, a selection of vintage control rooms dating back to the Soviet era! A beautiful collection of control rooms filled with large buttons and analog dials, long before the democratization of computers and…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the aesthetic of Soviet control rooms is often romanticized, commenters note that this &amp;#34;vintage&amp;#34; look was common across Western nuclear, transit, and utility infrastructure built before the computer age &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48869398&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not specific to the Soviet world, any control room built before computers looks like that. The examples I&amp;#39;m familiar with is nuclear power plants from the 70s: - here&amp;#39;s Bugey, the oldest active nuclear plant in France: https://cdn-s-www.leprogres.fr/images/5A6732BE-29F9-43FA-806... - And here&amp;#39;s Dampierre, the second oldest, which I was lucky enough to visit: https://www.larep.fr/photoSRC/Gw--/centrale-nucleaire-indust... I&amp;#39;m sure their&amp;#39;s plenty of other control rooms in the same style, for…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48869557&quot; title=&quot;Very true.  It reminds me of the aesthetic[1] of German musician Hainbach[2]&amp;#39;s studio. He makes use of a lot of early test equipment. The look is very functional but not ugly.  It&amp;#39;s not colourful but everything is well made because it&amp;#39;s made for professionals. I see the same thing in mid-century BBC studios. -- 1.  Which I love. 2. https://www.hainbachmusik.com/&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48869994&quot; title=&quot;Well, how about this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%85gesta_Nuclear_Plant#/med... This is from Swedens Ågesta Nuclear Plant, the first in the country. I don&amp;#39;t really get why you&amp;#39;d need all the used floor space. That seems to really be the key difference from those early control rooms and more modern ones. The old ones had you walking around and the new ones are designed to keep you seated. Still, it seems like the old ones had an excessive amount of floor space.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the specific Soviet design sensibility is unique &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48869520&quot; title=&quot;There is a specific Soviet design sensibility in the post in question that is lacking in those images.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others highlight that these era-defining layouts are now studied as canonical examples of poor user interface design, where a &amp;#34;sea of lights&amp;#34; contributed to disasters like Three Mile Island &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48869766&quot; title=&quot;Vintage nuclear plants are also infamously used as the canonical examples of bad UI in teaching. To paraphrase, the Three Mile Island Disaster happened because the operators couldn&amp;#39;t discern the right red light in a sea of other lights and noise. https://uxdesign.cc/three-mile-island-how-bad-ux-led-to-a-nu...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48869854&quot; title=&quot;The lessons of TMI have been learned though, the accident has been thoroughly investigated and that&amp;#39;s the reason why it&amp;#39;s now being discussed in class.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. To mitigate these design flaws, operators famously resorted to tactile hacks, such as attaching beer tap handles to levers to differentiate controls by feel &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48870284&quot; title=&quot;META: Make sure that your adblocker is set to 11 on that site. In the first edition of The Design of Everyday Things [0], Norman has a photo of beer tap handles on control levers in a nuclear power plant control room. This was done, to differentiate two important handles. I won’t link to the photo, because it’s on personal blogs, and I don’t want to hug anyone’s site to death. The photo was removed, in the current version. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Design_of_Everyday_Things&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fazamhd.com/mental-models/networking/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Networking and the Internet, from First Principles&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (fazamhd.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48871470&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;202 points · 68 comments · by faza&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article explains the first principles of networking, tracing the internet&amp;#39;s evolution from the digital telegraph and circuit-switched telephone lines to modern packet-switched architecture. It details how protocols like IP, TCP, and Ethernet enable global communication through decentralized routing, standardized addressing, and the fundamental physics of bandwidth and latency. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fazamhd.com/mental-models/networking/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Networking and the Internet, from First Principles · Faza    URL Source: https://fazamhd.com/mental-models/networking/    Published Time: 2026-07-10T18:30:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  Have you ever wondered what happens when we text, call, or video chat with a friend or a colleague on another continent, and their reply arrives in a fraction of a second, as though they were in the same room? Behind the scenes, a chain of invisible conversions takes place: your voice, video, or message is…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on allegations that the article is &amp;#34;AI slop,&amp;#34; with critics pointing to its superhuman length, specific linguistic &amp;#34;tells,&amp;#34; and poor design choices like dark-gray text on a black background &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48871611&quot; title=&quot;i hope this was vibe coded, because I&amp;#39;d hate to think that tiny dark-gray text on a black background was a conscious choice&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48871729&quot; title=&quot;The text is also pretty clearly AI-generated. I guess there&amp;#39;s now a market for &amp;#39;I asked an LLM so that you don&amp;#39;t have to&amp;#39;, but the funny thing is that it&amp;#39;s such a wall of text that no one upvoting it will have actually read it. So it&amp;#39;s vibe-writing, vibe-coding, and vibe-reading. Full end-to-end synergy.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872115&quot; title=&quot;Oh come on. Just seven days before this 60-page essay, you apparently cranked out another 40-page one: https://fazamhd.com/mental-models/software/ That&amp;#39;s 100+ pages of in-depth technical writing in a matter of days. Amazing, really amazing. Also, not something that a human can do. And FWIW, Pangram classifies vast swathes of &amp;#39;your&amp;#39; article as entirely AI-generated. Yes, I know the tool is not perfect, but between your superhuman productivity, and all the subjective tells, and the output from…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While the author maintains that Claude was only used for review and visualizations, skeptics argue the sheer volume of content produced in a short timeframe suggests the text itself was generated by an LLM &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48871756&quot; title=&quot;Hi, author here. Sorry, you felt that way. I did put lot of effort in communicating my understanding, and used Claude only for review and visualizations.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48871811&quot; title=&quot;Hi, author here. I didn&amp;#39;t vibe code this and have put considerable amount of effort in explaining the ideas. I have used Claude for review and help with visuals. My aim was just to help others understand these concepts easily. Thanks for your feedback, i&amp;#39;ll improve the design and reading experience.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872115&quot; title=&quot;Oh come on. Just seven days before this 60-page essay, you apparently cranked out another 40-page one: https://fazamhd.com/mental-models/software/ That&amp;#39;s 100+ pages of in-depth technical writing in a matter of days. Amazing, really amazing. Also, not something that a human can do. And FWIW, Pangram classifies vast swathes of &amp;#39;your&amp;#39; article as entirely AI-generated. Yes, I know the tool is not perfect, but between your superhuman productivity, and all the subjective tells, and the output from…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, some readers defended the work, arguing that the quality and clarity of the explanations matter more than the tools used to create them &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48871928&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand. Even if this post is long and has some repetitive parts, isn&amp;#39;t it still written by a human? There are way too many comments acting like everything is bad just because one animation widget was made with AI. I actually like this post. It looks good, the explanations are clear, and the AI-generated animation widget actually helps me understand things. What&amp;#39;s the problem exactly? Is using AI for visualization considered a bad practice?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872545&quot; title=&quot;I know the guidelines make this a faux pas but I’m just here to say that was a great read. Very informative, well structured and compelling story of how we have networks and how they work. To those saying it’s the work of an LLM: if it is I don’t care. It’s good.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48871954&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; What&amp;#39;s the problem exactly? Is using AI for visualization considered a bad practice? Some people just assume that anything &amp;#39;AI&amp;#39; has touched is automatically &amp;#39;slop&amp;#39; because ... AI!  Probably at least partly due to how much actual &amp;#39;AI slop&amp;#39; is out there produced by people &amp;#39;holding the tool wrong&amp;#39;.  When used judiciously and properly, some of these language models can really be a useful tool and help create some quality stuff, but they&amp;#39;re no substitute for a knowledgable human using the tool…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://theconversation.com/the-u-s-just-approved-a-giant-space-mirror-to-test-sunlight-on-demand-low-earth-orbit-is-getting-weird-283482&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;FCC approves test of space mirror to light night sky&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theconversation.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48871367&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;119 points · &lt;strong&gt;143 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by reaperducer&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FCC has approved a test by Reflect Orbital to launch a giant mirror satellite designed to reflect sunlight to specific locations on Earth at night. &lt;a href=&quot;https://theconversation.com/the-u-s-just-approved-a-giant-space-mirror-to-test-sunlight-on-demand-low-earth-orbit-is-getting-weird-283482&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.nytimes.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;07&amp;amp;#x2F;10&amp;amp;#x2F;climate&amp;amp;#x2F;fcc-space-mirror.html&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.nytimes.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;07&amp;amp;#x2F;10&amp;amp;#x2F;climate&amp;amp;#x2F;fcc-space-mirror....&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.pcmag.com&amp;amp;#x2F;news&amp;amp;#x2F;fcc-approves-reflect-orbitals-giant-mirror-satellite-that-astronomers-hate&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.pcmag.com&amp;amp;#x2F;news&amp;amp;#x2F;fcc-approves-reflect-orbitals-gia...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are largely skeptical of the project&amp;#39;s economic viability, arguing that space mirrors cannot compete with the low costs of terrestrial batteries and LED lighting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48871971&quot; title=&quot;How are the economics of this idea meant to be viable? The proposed business model is to park hundreds of millions to billion dollars of satellites in orbit, plus the costs to maintain and operate them, to meet the goal of selective area illumination and solar power. Ignoring the issue of cloud cover, which still seems to be an impediment. That&amp;#39;s going to need to directly compete with terrestrial energy storage technology, e.g. batteries, and... general lighting. Both of which are well…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48871934&quot; title=&quot;They seem to be talking about each satellite managing the luminosity of the full moon over a few square kilometres, and getting a few tens of thousands of them. Even if you ignoring how much drag these must have, and hence how much electrical power you&amp;#39;d need for an ion drive just to keep them up, each spot being a few km across (and only getting light while the satellite is over your horizon) is just not compelling. Given most people don&amp;#39;t have any reason to illuminate several square…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest potential revenue from illuminating large-scale public events or extending growing seasons in northern climates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872023&quot; title=&quot;The revenue potential is huge. Think of public events where people might want to illuminate the area as daylight for several hours. Galas, sports, concerts, parties, etc.. They will all pay top dollar and they have the funds. Could get sponsors, &amp;#39;Today&amp;#39;s sunlight brought to you by NordVPN&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872179&quot; title=&quot;With global warming, trillions upon trillions of acres of immensely fertile bogland, in Northern Canada is thawing.  The problem is, global warming doesn&amp;#39;t affect daylight.  4 hours of &amp;#39;the sun barely makes it over the horizon&amp;#39; means no crops, no matter if the temp is above 0C in September. Obviously this satellite isn&amp;#39;t viable, but all things start small.  Large tracts of land could be illuminated. But of course, I question the logic of redirecting more sunlight, especially such large amounts,…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others express serious concerns regarding the environmental impact of increasing solar radiation on a warming planet &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872179&quot; title=&quot;With global warming, trillions upon trillions of acres of immensely fertile bogland, in Northern Canada is thawing.  The problem is, global warming doesn&amp;#39;t affect daylight.  4 hours of &amp;#39;the sun barely makes it over the horizon&amp;#39; means no crops, no matter if the temp is above 0C in September. Obviously this satellite isn&amp;#39;t viable, but all things start small.  Large tracts of land could be illuminated. But of course, I question the logic of redirecting more sunlight, especially such large amounts,…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872654&quot; title=&quot;So we&amp;#39;ve got this problem of the atmosphere trapping too much heat from solar radiation hitting the surface and the plan is to increase the amount of solar radiation hitting the surface?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the technology is viewed as a significant security risk, with users noting its potential to be weaponized as a solar furnace or used for urban demolition &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48871934&quot; title=&quot;They seem to be talking about each satellite managing the luminosity of the full moon over a few square kilometres, and getting a few tens of thousands of them. Even if you ignoring how much drag these must have, and hence how much electrical power you&amp;#39;d need for an ion drive just to keep them up, each spot being a few km across (and only getting light while the satellite is over your horizon) is just not compelling. Given most people don&amp;#39;t have any reason to illuminate several square…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872178&quot; title=&quot;Wonder what would happen if a hacker focused all ten thousand of them on a single area for an hour or two. Sounds like a really energy-efficient way to demolish a city. X Wing: Wedge’s Gamble (1996) by Michael Stackpole shows the rebel alliance using similar tricks during the battle of Coruscant.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872203&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; relatively easy to redesign as weapons There is a fiction I&amp;#39;ve read years ago that mentioned satellites becoming makeshift weapons by overheating exposed objects (think reactors, gas trucks, oil refineries) by acting as a solar furnace [1] via mirrors. Not sure/don&amp;#39;t recall how it deals with practical issues such as clouds and distance/intensity, but good enough for a story I guess. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_furnace&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48872048&quot; title=&quot;Think of the military benefits.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://shipthatcode.com&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Learn by rebuilding Redis, Git, a database from scratch&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (shipthatcode.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48871973&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;191 points · 64 comments · by acley&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ship That Code offers over 80 hands-on courses and 14 career paths designed to teach software engineering by having students rebuild complex systems like Redis and Docker from scratch. &lt;a href=&quot;https://shipthatcode.com&quot; title=&quot;Title: Ship That Code — Build Real Systems, Not Tutorials    URL Source: https://shipthatcode.com/    Markdown Content:  ## Learn by building and shipping real systems.    Pick a system. Build it from scratch. Every lesson is choose →write →run, until it clicks.    80+ build-from-scratch courses · 9 languages · no credit card    [Explore all 80+ courses](https://shipthatcode.com/courses)    ## Follow a career path    Sequenced courses that take you from zero to job-ready.    [All…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The platform aims to move beyond &amp;#34;copy-paste&amp;#34; tutorials by providing real specifications and test-driven environments for building complex systems like Redis and Git &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48871988&quot; title=&quot;I kept noticing that most &amp;#39;learn to code&amp;#39; content is tutorials you copy-paste, so I never had to actually understand why anything worked. I built this to flip that: each lesson gives you a real spec (e.g. implement the Redis SET/GET protocol) and you write the code yourself, then it actually runs against tests. Right now there are 80+ of these &amp;#39;build X from scratch&amp;#39; courses — Redis, a database, Git, a compiler, a container runtime, a raft KV store, etc. — across Python, Go, Rust, C, C++, and…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While users noted similarities to CodeCrafters, the creator emphasizes that their service is free, offers a larger library of over 80 courses, and provides an integrated execution environment that avoids local setup hurdles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48873487&quot; title=&quot;its free&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874513&quot; title=&quot;But can you run it on their platform? NO, you need to run it on your own machine which takes a bit of work. And we have over 80 courses waaay over whatever codecrafters  has&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also touched on the broader &amp;#34;build your own&amp;#34; ecosystem, with some users questioning if content was sourced from existing technical books while others highlighted the high demand for quality guides in this space &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48874661&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s a book about doing this with Git. I wonder how much of the content is cribbed from sources like that, laundered through LLMs. https://shop.jcoglan.com/building-git/&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48875077&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been watching this space closely and have been on the lookout for new releases.  Besides &amp;#39;Building Git&amp;#39;, there is also &amp;#39;Building a Debugger&amp;#39;[0], &amp;#39;Writing a C compiler&amp;#39;[1], &amp;#39;Crafting Interpreters&amp;#39;[2], &amp;#39;The Raytracer Challenge&amp;#39;[3], and a few others that I can&amp;#39;t vouch for as they appear to be low-quality compared to the ones I listed out. The potential for technical authors in this space is enormous. [0]: https://nostarch.com/building-a-debugger [1]: https://nostarch.com/writing-c-compiler…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/Wren6991/RISCBoy&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;RISCBoy is an open-source portable games console, designed from scratch&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876245&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;202 points · 32 comments · by mariuz&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RISCBoy is an open-source portable games console featuring a custom RISC-V compatible CPU, graphics pipeline, and PCB design written in synthesizable Verilog for iCE40 FPGAs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/Wren6991/RISCBoy&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - Wren6991/RISCBoy: Portable games console, designed from scratch: CPU, graphics, PCB, and the kitchen sink    URL Source: https://github.com/Wren6991/RISCBoy    Markdown Content:  RISCBoy is an open-source portable games console, designed from scratch. This includes:    *   A RISC-V compatible CPU  *   A raster graphics pipeline and display controller  *   Other chip infrastructure: busfabric, memory controllers, UART, GPIO etc.  *   A PCB layout in KiCad    [![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The RISCBoy project is highly regarded due to the pedigree of its creator, Luke Wren, a Raspberry Pi engineer known for designing CPU cores and the PicoDVI project &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877191&quot; title=&quot;Oh this is Luke Wren’s work. He’s an ASIC design engineer at Raspberry Pi. Amazing project, I love it!&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877462&quot; title=&quot;I think &amp;#39;ASIC design&amp;#39; engineer is under-selling him--he&amp;#39;s working on their CPU cores too!&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877351&quot; title=&quot;This guy also designed DVI/HDMI from RP2040: https://github.com/Wren6991/PicoDVI&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users inquired about running the Godot Engine on the device, others argued that the hardware&amp;#39;s retro nature—described as a &amp;#34;parallel universe&amp;#34; Gameboy Advance—is better suited for writing games directly without an engine &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876531&quot; title=&quot;Does RISCBoy run Godot Engine? How can I make RISCBoy run Godot Engine?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876702&quot; title=&quot;From the GitHub page: &amp;gt; It is a Gameboy Advance from a parallel universe where RISC-V existed in 2001. A love letter to the handheld consoles from my childhood, and a 3AM drunk text to the technology that powered them.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876846&quot; title=&quot;No. You can&amp;#39;t.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881027&quot; title=&quot;Why do you want an engine? Just write games&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the community praised the project&amp;#39;s documentation for its technical clarity and lack of &amp;#34;LLM-slop&amp;#34; emojis &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877211&quot; title=&quot;Thank you to the author for writing a GitHub page in 2026 that is entirely devoid of emoji.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877246&quot; title=&quot;on the other hand having emoji on the readme is a great signal of llm-slop on my radar&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.vt.edu/articles/2025/11/research_fralinbiomed_yanweightlifting.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Weightlifting beats running for blood sugar control, researchers find (2025)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (news.vt.edu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876593&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;144 points · 85 comments · by sublinear&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Virginia Tech researchers found that weightlifting outperforms running in improving insulin sensitivity, reducing body fat, and managing blood sugar levels in preclinical models of obesity and Type 2 diabetes. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.vt.edu/articles/2025/11/research_fralinbiomed_yanweightlifting.html&quot; title=&quot;Weightlifting beats running for blood sugar control, researchers find    Virginia Tech scientists at the Fralin Biomedical Research Institute show that resistance training outperforms endurance exercise in improving insulin sensitivity in obesity and Type 2 diabetes models.    * [Skip to main content](#vt_main)  * [Skip to    search](#vt_search_box)    [![](https://www.assets.cms.vt.edu/images/whiteVTonTransparent.svg)Virginia…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the study suggests weightlifting is superior for blood sugar control, users emphasize that the most effective exercise is ultimately the one an individual will consistently perform &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876795&quot; title=&quot;Weightlifing is the only exercise that I&amp;#39;ve ever managed to make a habit. I do powerlifting 3x/week. I&amp;#39;ve tried running, swimming, cycling, etc. and hated all of it.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876906&quot; title=&quot;The exercise you like doing and will do beats no exercise at all for blood sugar control&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics point out that the research was conducted on mice using specific feeding mechanisms that may not translate perfectly to human behavior &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876649&quot; title=&quot;(in mice) - I get it if it’s some new experimental drug, a mouse probably makes sense to test first. With exercise you’d think they could go straight to humans? Seems like it would be more effort getting mice to lift weights than it’s worth.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876989&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;In this model, mice lived in specially designed cages where food was accessed through a hinged, weighted lid. To eat, the mice had to lift the lid while wearing a small shoulder collar, causing a squat-like movement that engaged the muscle contractions people use during resistance exercise. The load was gradually increased over several days, mimicking progressive strength training.&amp;#39; So the study doesn&amp;#39;t really show that weighlifting per se is beneficial, but putting food behind weighted…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the study&amp;#39;s focus, commenters debated the merits of running as a meditative and accessible practice &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48876981&quot; title=&quot;Running is quite meditative when you get in to it (at least for me when outside - indoor running on treadmills is soul destroying though I agree). You don&amp;#39;t have to go fast or far, but after 10-15-20 mins I find my mind gets into a fairly calm state, even if my legs and lungs are burning. We - as a species - are engineered and built to run. I think there is a lot to be said for it. If anyone is reading this and considering giving it a go, please do. You don&amp;#39;t need any specific fancy equipment…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, though they noted that strength training provides unique metabolic benefits that make daily life easier &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877123&quot; title=&quot;Yeah but sometimes you have to do things you don&amp;#39;t particularly like. For example there are lots of people who do nothing but cycling and never do any sort of strength training which is certainly healthier than doing absolutely nothing but they are really missing out by not doing strength training.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48877361&quot; title=&quot;I find it fascinating that people who exercise would want to skip the weights. Strength training makes everything else so much easier, even &amp;#39;doing nothing&amp;#39; (sleep, metabolism, etc.)!&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-07-10</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-07-10</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://9to5mac.com/2026/07/10/apple-sues-openai-trade-secret-theft/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apple sues OpenAI, accuses ex-employees of stealing trade secrets&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (9to5mac.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48865019&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1633 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 941 comments · by stock_toaster&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging that former employees stole proprietary trade secrets to benefit the artificial intelligence company. &lt;a href=&quot;https://9to5mac.com/2026/07/10/apple-sues-openai-trade-secret-theft/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.macrumors.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;07&amp;amp;#x2F;10&amp;amp;#x2F;apple-sues-openai&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.macrumors.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;07&amp;amp;#x2F;10&amp;amp;#x2F;apple-sues-openai&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The lawsuit reveals a pattern of alleged industrial espionage, including OpenAI recruits being coached to hide their new roles and tricking suppliers into sharing Apple&amp;#39;s proprietary metal-finishing techniques &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48865294&quot; title=&quot;Some pretty damning stuff: &amp;gt; OpenAI also instructs new hires on how to avoid scrutiny when they leave Apple. For example, Mr. Tan warns them not to tell Apple that they have taken jobs at OpenAI, so they can stay at Apple as long as they can. &amp;gt; Apple says it discovered a pattern of OpenAI recruits emailing themselves confidential information when leaving Apple, including Tan. &amp;gt; OpenAI apparently used confidential Apple hardware information when approaching Apple suppliers, and tricked one…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters expressed disbelief at the &amp;#34;brazen&amp;#34; behavior of ex-employees who reportedly kept company laptops, exploited vulnerabilities to download documents, and joked about their continued access via text &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48866774&quot; title=&quot;It gets even worse. The person not only kept the laptop and used an exploit to download confidential Apple documents, they bragged about it to a contact who was still working at Apple who was also feeding him information: &amp;gt; Liu allegedly kept an Apple-issued laptop after departing the company and exploited a vulnerability to download dozens of confidential Apple documents while he was working at OpenAI. He also maintained a relationship with Yu-Ting &amp;#39;Alyssa&amp;#39; Peng, an Apple employee who…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48865396&quot; title=&quot;This isn’t the first time something like this happens and I always wonder how are these seemingly smart people earning good money so dumb.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48867809&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;This is how you behave when you think you&amp;#39;re so much smarter than everyone around you that consequences don&amp;#39;t apply you. Spot on perfect. I see this too often and not just in tech.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate whether Apple’s internal security failures contributed to the breach &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48866970&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Whenever I leave a company I make sure...&amp;#39; But its also that companies responsibility to ensure that the employer doesn&amp;#39;t take anything. Apple know how to use MDM on Apple laptops, why wasn&amp;#39;t the device locked and located.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, the consensus is that OpenAI faces a potentially &amp;#34;open and shut&amp;#34; case against Apple&amp;#39;s vast legal resources &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48866488&quot; title=&quot;OpenAI is about to get ROCKED on this. From this report, this looks open and shut. Apple has basically infinite money and incredible lawyers. Not sure what OpenAI can counter with unless they have clear, hard evidence this hasn’t been happening.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48866293&quot; title=&quot;A company that behaves like this in one area, cannot be trusted in any area. Any enterprise that endorses/allows OpenAI products to be used is taking a big risk.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.zdnet.com/home-and-office/networking/spacex-wants-to-launch-100000-more-starlink-satellites/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites for 100x the bandwidth&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (zdnet.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48863064&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;314 points · &lt;strong&gt;1190 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by CrankyBear&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SpaceX has applied for FCC permission to launch 100,000 third-generation Starlink satellites, aiming to deliver multi-gigabit speeds and a 100-fold increase in bandwidth despite concerns from astronomers regarding the constellation&amp;#39;s impact on space observation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.zdnet.com/home-and-office/networking/spacex-wants-to-launch-100000-more-starlink-satellites/&quot; title=&quot;SpaceX wants to launch 100,000 more Starlink satellites - for 100x the bandwidth    It could mean faster internet for rural customers, but not everyone is happy.    X    Trending    * [I wore the world&amp;#39;s first HDR10 smart glasses](/article/rayneo-air-4-pro-hdr10-smart-glasses-ces/)  * [TCL&amp;#39;s new E Ink tablet beats the Remarkable and Kindle](/article/tcl-note-a1-nxtpaper-ces/)  * [Anker&amp;#39;s new charger is one of the most unique I&amp;#39;ve ever seen](/article/anker-wireless-chargers-ces-2026/)  * [Best laptop…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The expansion of Starlink has sparked a debate between those who view the visible satellite constellations as a &amp;#34;depressing&amp;#34; loss of the natural night sky &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48869148&quot; title=&quot;I have started to see what I think are star link satellites at night on walks with my kids. It actually makes me sad to see that on person owns the night sky and is changing the literal stars my kids will grow up with. It feels different when it’s the government that theoretically represents people but when it’s one person that feels truly depressing.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48867610&quot; title=&quot;Will this be the last generation to remember the night sky?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48869798&quot; title=&quot;Buddy our anceostors were able to see the night sky. I don&amp;#39;t need a space station with space tourism only the richest can afford and will be still very dangerous to see the stars right now. What you will see is how Starlink satelites will poisen our atmosphere at re-entry.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt; and those who see them as a symbol of human progress and the democratization of space &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48869238&quot; title=&quot;buddy our ancestors didn’t even have light at night nor heat/ac. life for our kin will only be better. we will have space stations where you can visit and see all the stars you want. there will be space tourism and that will be pretty cool. that’s what i wanted as a kid and its cool to see it play out irl. edit: dang didn&amp;#39;t expect so many negative people&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48870698&quot; title=&quot;Change is inevitable. I love seeing artificial objects in space, because it shows that we, humanity, are finally getting there. Elon doesn&amp;#39;t own space, he just happens to be the one who is currently best at making it reachable. There is plenty of space for everyone else, and others will get there, eventually. I could eat myself up with envy over the money he&amp;#39;s making from it... or be glad that it&amp;#39;s at least someone getting rewarded for moving humanity forward (while also being an asshole),…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users highlight Starlink&amp;#39;s vital role for RV travelers and remote workers in areas without cellular coverage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48863504&quot; title=&quot;When COVID hit, I knew a lot of engineers who decided to move to rural areas / small farms because they could leverage Starlink to work remotely. Last year, when I asked whether they still liked Starlink, all of them said it is amazing, but they had gotten fiber coverage in their area from a local provider, so they don&amp;#39;t use it anymore, or just use it as a backup. I think Starlink was a huge demand signal that there were people willing to pay a premium for faster-than-radio internet. So, unless…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48868422&quot; title=&quot;I just finished a long RV trip and I can tell you it&amp;#39;s hard to underestimate the importance of internet access (which also means Wi-Fi calling and access to maps and weather) across our entire, enormous nation. It&amp;#39;s important not only for individuals but even more for businesses. Despite cell phone company ads with handsome celebrities in the desert, cell phones actually do not work in many places. But people do need to live and work in those places.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others question its long-term commercial viability as fiber optic networks rapidly expand into rural Europe and India &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48863244&quot; title=&quot;When Starlink first became available here in poor-ish Central-EU, I was excited. Then, only months later, but after years of planning: EU funding brought fiber to my farm area, at ~$25/900mbps 10ms. While my story is just n=1, I don&amp;#39;t understand the huge upside for Starlink outside of Africa or India, where they have &amp;lt;.1% the money to spend on such things. However, I am dumb, and very open to be convinced.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48867168&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I don&amp;#39;t understand the huge upside for Starlink outside of Africa or India, where they have &amp;lt;.1% the money to spend on such things. India is rapidly expanding fiber internet connectivity, even in rural areas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bharat_Broadband_Network In addition, 4G/5G coverage is extensive: https://www.ookla.com/articles/india-mobile-connectivity-1h2... See India in this 5G global coverage map: https://www.ookla.com/articles/5g-map-2026 The number of people who are not covered…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48863504&quot; title=&quot;When COVID hit, I knew a lot of engineers who decided to move to rural areas / small farms because they could leverage Starlink to work remotely. Last year, when I asked whether they still liked Starlink, all of them said it is amazing, but they had gotten fiber coverage in their area from a local provider, so they don&amp;#39;t use it anymore, or just use it as a backup. I think Starlink was a huge demand signal that there were people willing to pay a premium for faster-than-radio internet. So, unless…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics also express concern over the environmental impact of satellite re-entry and the concentration of orbital power in the hands of a single individual &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48869148&quot; title=&quot;I have started to see what I think are star link satellites at night on walks with my kids. It actually makes me sad to see that on person owns the night sky and is changing the literal stars my kids will grow up with. It feels different when it’s the government that theoretically represents people but when it’s one person that feels truly depressing.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48870698&quot; title=&quot;Change is inevitable. I love seeing artificial objects in space, because it shows that we, humanity, are finally getting there. Elon doesn&amp;#39;t own space, he just happens to be the one who is currently best at making it reachable. There is plenty of space for everyone else, and others will get there, eventually. I could eat myself up with envy over the money he&amp;#39;s making from it... or be glad that it&amp;#39;s at least someone getting rewarded for moving humanity forward (while also being an asshole),…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48869798&quot; title=&quot;Buddy our anceostors were able to see the night sky. I don&amp;#39;t need a space station with space tourism only the richest can afford and will be still very dangerous to see the stars right now. What you will see is how Starlink satelites will poisen our atmosphere at re-entry.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/quadrf-can-spot-drones-and-see-wifi-through-my-wall/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;QuadRF can spot drones and see WiFi through my wall&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jeffgeerling.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48861717&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;743 points · 234 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The QuadRF is an open-source, handheld phased-array radio built on a Raspberry Pi 5 that uses advanced signal processing to visualize 5 GHz radio frequencies, track drones, and see WiFi signals through walls. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/quadrf-can-spot-drones-and-see-wifi-through-my-wall/&quot; title=&quot;Title: QuadRF can spot drones and see WiFi through my wall    URL Source: https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/quadrf-can-spot-drones-and-see-wifi-through-my-wall/    Published Time: 2026-07-10T09:00:00-05:00    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: QuadRF antenna array from front](https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/quadrf-can-spot-drones-and-see-wifi-through-my-wall/quadrf-antennna-array.jpeg)  The [QuadRF](https://scalerf.com/) (pictured above) a phased-array radio built around a Raspberry Pi 5 and an…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;QuadRF is a new 4x4 MIMO software-defined radio that uses a low-latency web app to merge RF data with camera feeds for an augmented reality experience &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48864276&quot; title=&quot;QuadRF creator here. Happy to answer questions! We have a quick demo video as well: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QvniJk3uNyA Along with a deeper dive video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zdJ9Tbm8ALg We didn&amp;#39;t give Jeff great direction on camera alignment calibration or setting the radio gain but he seemed to mostly figure it out. We&amp;#39;re improving the UI based on his suggestions (it&amp;#39;s open source so you can customize it too) The RF augmented reality is just one of many applications of this brand…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Users discussed its potential for drone detection, though some noted that modern electronic warfare has shifted toward fiber-optic tethering or high-energy microwaves to counter RF jamming and frequency hopping &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48863539&quot; title=&quot;I just kinda skimmed through it, so it detects drones in sky? Am I understanding this correctly? That might have some defense application considering what&amp;#39;s going on in Eastern Europe right now.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48863725&quot; title=&quot;It detects drones which send out RF signals at the same frequency band. Most drones used in Ukraine are tethered with thin optical wire exactly because one of the first anti-drone measures was to simply jam them at the frequencies the operators used. There are some more advanced anti-drone measures at work: Like blasting them with directed high-energy microwaves to destroy the circuits.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48864022&quot; title=&quot;Brute force wide band jamming would be easy too and would make hopping ineffective. Unless drones use self tuning antennas to overcome losses, they can&amp;#39;t hop too far away from the antenna resonance frequency, which makes jammers job easier.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48864576&quot; title=&quot;Jamming broadband is a lot more energy expense than frequency hopping. Orders of magnitude.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Others suggested the technology could be used to investigate theories about hidden cellular uplinks in consumer electronics or adapted for acoustic applications like pinpointing mechanical squeaks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862999&quot; title=&quot;One day I want to build something like this, except for sound. It would be great to get a heading and distance for where a sound is coming from. This could be both for small scale things (e.g. which part of this is squeaking?) or large scale (e.g. is that booming noise coming from the construction a few blocks away?)&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862509&quot; title=&quot;The visualizer reminds me of my thermal camera. I have heard claims of devices (mostly TVs) supposedly coming with secret 5G cell uplinks built in [never heard a specific model mentioned though]. If there were more variants covering more commonly-used RF bands, people could walk around and literally check for once. (incidentally i&amp;#39;m sure three letter agencies have had this sort of tech in their bug-detecting toolkit for a LONG time)&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862703&quot; title=&quot;Whos paying the telcos for those 5G connections and also has the FCC been degraded so much that they would allow for undeclared radios in consumer products?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/10/new-york-city-deceptive-subscriptions-ban&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;New York City to ban deceptive subscription practices&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theguardian.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48863464&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;636 points · 337 comments · by randycupertino&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;New York City has announced a landmark &amp;#34;click-to-cancel&amp;#34; law aimed at protecting consumers by banning deceptive subscription practices and making it easier to terminate recurring services. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/10/new-york-city-deceptive-subscriptions-ban&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.nyc.gov&amp;amp;#x2F;mayors-office&amp;amp;#x2F;news&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;07&amp;amp;#x2F;mayor-mamdani-announces-landmark--click-to-cancel--consumer-prot&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.nyc.gov&amp;amp;#x2F;mayors-office&amp;amp;#x2F;news&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;07&amp;amp;#x2F;mayor-mamdani...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While users generally praise the new rules as a victory for consumer rights &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48865475&quot; title=&quot;This is what legitimate government looks like.  Leaders actually advocating for the people who are being deceived by those in power instead of helping those in power. While this may be a trivial issue, being able to cancel a gym or newspaper subscription, it sends a signal. Companies need to view customers as partners in a business transaction and not objects to be exploited.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, some argue the &amp;#34;landmark&amp;#34; label is exaggerated since similar laws already exist in California &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48864201&quot; title=&quot;These rules are great but “landmark” seems like puffery, as California has had such rules for quite a while. Ironically that has meant it’s hard to unsubscribe from the New York Times except in California.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. A major point of contention is whether the legislation will effectively ban &amp;#34;junk fees&amp;#34; like restaurant surcharges, with some noting that California&amp;#39;s version includes frustrating carve-outs for the hospitality industry &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48863860&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s unclear whether this junk fee law will have teeth. In theory, California has the same anti-drip pricing law, but restaurants have a specific carve out [1] which is bullshit because the drip pricing that most people complain about is the X% &amp;#39;service charges&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;lifestyle fees&amp;#39; that restaurants have at the bottom of their menu in small print. From what I can tell online, NYC rules won&amp;#39;t have this carveout, but I haven&amp;#39;t eaten there recently so I can&amp;#39;t confirm. [1]…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48864224&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s unfortunately somewhat common these days and personally I actively avoid any place which does this. At least it&amp;#39;s only somewhat common rather than the standard so it&amp;#39;s still possible. Couple of examples: https://sushiconfidential.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/sc_... &amp;#39;3.5% Living Wage Surcharge added to each bill which allows us to provide the service you have always enjoyed!&amp;#39; https://www.pacificcatch.com/menu/ &amp;#39;NorCal - A 3% surcharge (5% in San Francisco) will be added to all Guest…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Developers in the thread confirm the absurdity of current practices, noting they have previously been tasked with writing code that only displays &amp;#34;cancel&amp;#34; buttons to users in specific legal jurisdictions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48864744&quot; title=&quot;I once wrote code that checks location before hiding/showing the cancel button. It’s really absurd that the nice experience exists on all subscription sites by now but you only get to see it if your state demands it.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/04d1d1e4-bc75-476a-97cf-49055cd98d31/cdc_proof.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra produces proof of the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture [pdf]&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cdn.openai.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48863490&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;532 points · 433 comments · by scrlk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra has reportedly produced a proof for the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture, a long-standing problem in graph theory. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/04d1d1e4-bc75-476a-97cf-49055cd98d31/cdc_proof.pdf&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;x.com&amp;amp;#x2F;__eknight__&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2075643450196971805&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;x.com&amp;amp;#x2F;__eknight__&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2075643450196971805&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;__eknight__&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2075643450196971805&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;__eknight__&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2075643450196971805&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Prompt: &amp;lt;a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The potential proof of the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture by GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra is viewed as a major milestone, signaling that AI may now rival human mathematicians in solving famous open problems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48864305&quot; title=&quot;If all checks out this is a huge milestone.  AI has now solved one of the most famous open problems in graph theory, using an off the shelf model, in one hour. It might be a better mathematician than most humans at this point.  Kind of like when chess software started beating everyone except grandmasters. What’s left?  Proposing and building out entirely new theories and frameworks? Then better than any human?  Then alien math results we struggle to comprehend?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users question the actual utility of such mathematical results compared to software or text &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48864074&quot; title=&quot;This is not a remark about AI, but there&amp;#39;s something funny about mathematics in that every novel result is broadly perceived as a big deal. We attach basically zero value to writing a new program that hasn&amp;#39;t existed before, or a piece of text that hasn&amp;#39;t existed before. It&amp;#39;s boring, or even a net negative, unless you can show that the result benefits the world in some way. We&amp;#39;d find it weird if OpenAI put out a release saying that an LLM authored an interesting blog post. For mathematics, I…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that the true test remains &amp;#34;theory-building&amp;#34;—creating substantial new frameworks rather than exploiting concise &amp;#34;clever tricks&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48864086&quot; title=&quot;Unlike the unit distance problem, the impressive thing here is that it is a proof rather than a counter-example. However, it seems the proof is extremely concise so it seems that it is exploiting a clever trick that somehow all the experts missed. So not to dunk on this amazing result (or move the goal post), but it seems now the only achievement that AI hasn&amp;#39;t managed in mathematics is presenting an autonomous &amp;#39;theory-building&amp;#39; proof of an open conjecture. That is a proof that requires…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Skepticism persists regarding the proof&amp;#39;s validity, with calls for professional peer review or formal verification in Lean to ensure the result isn&amp;#39;t merely a plausible-looking hallucination &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48864095&quot; title=&quot;Since this isn&amp;#39;t in Lean and it&amp;#39;s extremely easy for something like this to contain a subtle mistake, I think I&amp;#39;d prefer this be announced by a professional mathematician. The proof appears relatively short and elementary (not to be confused with easy -- just not using any advanced or modern machinery) so it shouldn&amp;#39;t take long for the mathematics community to do a peer review. Without that, you could easily crank out hundreds or thousands of PDFs like this that all look plausible and are…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.gingerbill.org/article/2026/07/10/good-tools-are-invisible/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Good Tools Are Invisible&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (gingerbill.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48858121&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;555 points · 270 comments · by theanonymousone&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Effective tools should be &amp;#34;invisible&amp;#34; by minimizing friction and disappearing into the background, rather than being celebrated for complex flaws or steep learning curves that users mistake for productivity. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.gingerbill.org/article/2026/07/10/good-tools-are-invisible/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Good Tools Are Invisible    URL Source: https://www.gingerbill.org/article/2026/07/10/good-tools-are-invisible/    Markdown Content:  2026-07-10    TL;DR: A good tool is and ought to be invisible—striving to make such tools is the goal of a toolmaker.    One habit I see a lot, and have to push back on, is taking a tool’s shortcomings and reselling them as a “puzzle game” which is “fun” to solve.    I don’t want my tools to be “fun”. I want my tools to be _invisible_.    ## [Text Editor…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether &amp;#34;invisible&amp;#34; tools are defined by objective efficiency or subjective familiarity, with users debating if the terminal’s steep learning curve eventually yields superior productivity through composable pipelines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859300&quot; title=&quot;As a long time terminal user, it does not surprise me much when people just don&amp;#39;t get it . The discussion often goes like this: — In a terminal, I can do so-and-so with a simple command — Well, in my FrobnicatorStudio, there&amp;#39;s a shortcut Ctrl+Alt+So for that and this can go forever, going into pretty much useless comparisons like &amp;#39;in vim, I can delete 24 lines by pressing four keys&amp;#39; (no Sublime user ever needs that) vs &amp;#39;in Sublime I have multiple cursors&amp;#39; (no vim user ever needs that either).…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48863221&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think your logic is off, but I also think that the FrobnosticatorStudio people have a point. The thing is, yes, the terminal gives you infinitely more capabilities but you probably have like, 20 actual things you do regularly? The learning curve makes it a hard sell when those 20 things are probably all you need. Like, sometimes I&amp;#39;ll do something like this if I&amp;#39;m in a terminal and I want to find a build script cat packages.json | jq .scripts And that&amp;#39;s useful if I&amp;#39;m in the terminal, but…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that many developers mistake personal flow and muscle memory for universal superiority, noting that keyboard-centric workflows are rarely measured against GUI alternatives and may simply reflect a preference for avoiding &amp;#34;flow-breaking&amp;#34; context shifts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859383&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; usually because they don’t realize how much more productive keyboard navigation is than reaching for the mouse a lot of the time. In a large number of cases people who say they are more productive have never measured it.  They have no idea if it is true. There are been many competitions between keyboard and mouse navigation over the years. Depending on the details of how the test is written one will win or the other, often by a significant amount, in many cases the loser is the one that user…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859395&quot; title=&quot;I am afraid the author confuses familiarity with proof that his tools are better. The reality is that every tool has a trade off, and if a user prefers tool X compared to tool Y, it’s not because they are dumb, but likely they make better use of the affordances of that tool that only a power user would get. Give a developer 10 years each with vim, emacs and Sublime Text, they wouldn’t be so sure which is better. [1] They might have a personal favourite, sure, but would also be able to tell why…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859519&quot; title=&quot;I think if you need to measure this kind of thing, you&amp;#39;re missing the point in the first place. I don&amp;#39;t want to be chasing some absolute productivity metric, I want a setup that doesn&amp;#39;t break my flow. For many people, reaching for the mouse breaks their flow and feels wrong, which is oftentimes worse than being a second slower, because it takes you out of the mental frame you were in. For me, using my mouse while I&amp;#39;m working feels natural, so trying to change my workflow to learn how to…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some contend that complex features like Vim macros are often inefficient &amp;#34;puzzles&amp;#34; compared to modern IDE tools, others maintain that good design should focus on creating a &amp;#34;pit of success&amp;#34; where the tool&amp;#39;s mechanics disappear regardless of the specific interface &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859332&quot; title=&quot;Having designed a good number of internal tools for teams of developers I couldn&amp;#39;t agree more. Earlier I had the tendency to &amp;#39;leave the guts&amp;#39; open, thinking my users were developers and would want that. All it did was put obstacles in my teammates actually doing their work. My teammates must use the tools I made for them to achieve work the company needs them to do, they don&amp;#39;t want, nor should they want to, fiddle with a little tool they won&amp;#39;t find anywhere else. I still leave a lot of escape…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859810&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I am afraid the author confuses familiarity with proof that his tools are better. Literally NOT what I was implying or even said anywhere. Quote me where I said anything like that. To quote myself: &amp;gt; What baffles me is that so many people treat that friction—the effort of working around a tool’s limitations—as the “fun” part, and then advertise it as evidence that the tool is great. This has nothing to do with why I or another person one tool over another, but rather treating the flaws as if…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859846&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s not what I was saying. I used vim macros specifically as an example, not Vim as a whole. &amp;gt; I’ve had people tell me how “fun” it was to build a macro to handle some one-off text-refactoring problem. But when I looked at what they were doing and how long it took, my honest reaction was: I could have done that in Sublime in a minute with multiple cursors, or just written a quick script. and &amp;gt; What baffles me is that so many people treat that friction—the effort of working around a tool’s…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/1080822/990a8a5e2d379085/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;An update on residential proxies and the scraper situation&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lwn.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48864252&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;350 points · &lt;strong&gt;377 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by chmaynard&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LWN reports that web scraping for AI training has escalated into a global &amp;#34;arms race,&amp;#34; with attackers increasingly hijacking millions of consumer devices via residential proxy networks to bypass site defenses and overwhelm the open internet with coordinated traffic. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/1080822/990a8a5e2d379085/&quot; title=&quot;Title: An update on the scraper situation    URL Source: https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/1080822/990a8a5e2d379085/    Published Time: Sat, 11 Jul 2026 04:11:15 GMT    Markdown Content:  ## [LWN subscriber-only content]    &amp;gt; ### Welcome to LWN.net  &amp;gt;   &amp;gt;   &amp;gt; The following subscription-only content has been made available to you by an LWN subscriber. Thousands of subscribers depend on LWN for the best news from the Linux and free software communities. If you enjoy this article, please consider [subscribing to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of residential proxies is viewed by some as the normalization of botnet-like behavior, operating openly without legal consequence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48865433&quot; title=&quot;Residential Proxies are the most emblematic technology of our era- a group of people looked at something that used to be considered a crime (botnets) and realized that if they just did it openly, no one would ever punish them.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see these proxies as a necessary &amp;#34;anti-hero&amp;#34; for maintaining an open internet against aggressive blocking, others argue that the resulting arms race—including proof-of-work challenges and data poisoning—threatens the accessibility of the web for human users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48864848&quot; title=&quot;There is a large community of people that poison scrapers. The poison gets better every day, and the community is continuously growing. Poison Fountain, alone, transmits hundreds of gigabytes of poison per day, which goes into scrapers, git repositories on every hosting platform, social media, etc. Part of the poisoning community on Reddit, for example: https://www.reddit.com/r/PoisonFountain/comments/1uocaii/a_n...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48866932&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; ...we have tried to minimize the impact on real readers as much as possible. We have not gone with tools like Anubis, partly because it causes annoying delays for those trying to get to the site, but also partly because it seems inevitable that the scrapers will eventually find their way around it. Indeed, there are some indications that is already happening. A proof-of-work requirement is not a huge obstacle when you have millions of other people&amp;#39;s machines to do the work on. It&amp;#39;s massively…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48866027&quot; title=&quot;Thank god for residential proxies. Highly unethical but the way the internet is going they&amp;#39;re the last anti-hero of a somewhat open internet&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant confusion regarding the scale of this activity, with users questioning why scrapers target the same pages millions of times per hour, speculating it could be due to poorly configured AI agents or massive underground labs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48866334&quot; title=&quot;What really confuses me is ... people always say, it&amp;#39;s because companies are gathering data for AI training. Then why would they need to scrape the same page thousands of times per day? Edit: the article says millions of times per hour? (!?) The article is also astonished by this, and speculates it might be some kind of underground AI labs but... millions of them? Or does it only take one with too much money and a badly configured scraping setup?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48865206&quot; title=&quot;I wonder how much of this is traffic caused by peoples agents using web tools causing searches and fetches rather than general trawls of the internet.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://acoup.blog/2026/01/30/collections-the-late-bronze-age-collapse-a-very-brief-introduction/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Late Bronze Age Collapse&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (acoup.blog)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48858737&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;421 points · 305 comments · by dmonay&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Late Bronze Age Collapse was a period of widespread societal decline and site destruction across the Eastern Mediterranean between 1220 and 1170 BC, likely caused by a combination of climate change, harvest failures, and the disruption of international trade networks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://acoup.blog/2026/01/30/collections-the-late-bronze-age-collapse-a-very-brief-introduction/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Collections: The Late Bronze Age Collapse, A Very Brief Introduction    URL Source: https://acoup.blog/2026/01/30/collections-the-late-bronze-age-collapse-a-very-brief-introduction/    Published Time: 2026-01-31T01:45:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  [Skip to content](https://acoup.blog/2026/01/30/collections-the-late-bronze-age-collapse-a-very-brief-introduction/#content)    ![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Late Bronze Age collapse is often attributed to a &amp;#34;perfect storm&amp;#34; of factors, most notably a centuries-long drought that crippled international trade and exhausted grain reserves &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859281&quot; title=&quot;Seems to be a popular topic. Historian Eric H. Cline has multiple books citing this time period, specifically 1117 BCE as the inflection point for the bronze age &amp;#39;collapse&amp;#39;, defined by a deterioration of international shipping routes that weakened the nation-states of the era. I&amp;#39;ve learned about it recently because YouTube began recommending videos about it. For example: https://youtu.be/choxcHXhZhE?is=t5lDwQQpqPsE2k5M One historical event that Cline focuses on is a severe centuries-long…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859462&quot; title=&quot;The drought explanation seems particularly plausible for the Hittites, IMO.  They had grain storage, but ~3 years of drought would exhaust that.  So if the climate becomes just a bit drier the chance of such a three year run increases enough to likely crash their society. Today we have a huge buffer from the large use of grain to feed animals.  In a crisis it could be diverted as human food, with some effort.  Large geographic range from global shipping also smooths out blips.  Still, a…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate the role of the &amp;#34;Sea Peoples&amp;#34; and mass migrations, others suggest these movements were likely a direct consequence of the climate-driven famine &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859281&quot; title=&quot;Seems to be a popular topic. Historian Eric H. Cline has multiple books citing this time period, specifically 1117 BCE as the inflection point for the bronze age &amp;#39;collapse&amp;#39;, defined by a deterioration of international shipping routes that weakened the nation-states of the era. I&amp;#39;ve learned about it recently because YouTube began recommending videos about it. For example: https://youtu.be/choxcHXhZhE?is=t5lDwQQpqPsE2k5M One historical event that Cline focuses on is a severe centuries-long…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48861041&quot; title=&quot;Eric Cline is great - when i had a tooth removed in a somewhat nasty procedure i spent a Caturday hepped up on goofballs watching his videos on LBA while playing Hatshepsut on Diety in Civ VII 1.4 (i got to play test 1.3.2 via Firaxis via discord, ooh la la i call a car hole a garage) in my personal &amp;#39;immersive learning&amp;#39; period starting 2021, i discovered acoup.blog when Old World came out and extended into reading while playing Civ VI and CK III. it actually started the February before COVID,…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The era&amp;#39;s instability also draws comparisons to Biblical narratives like the Exodus; however, commenters disagree on whether these stories reflect historical memories of nomadic resettlement or are entirely mythical accounts lacking archaeological evidence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859972&quot; title=&quot;It injects some really interesting color into the Tanakh/Old Testament - I&amp;#39;m not sure anyone has definitively lined up the Bronze Age Collapse with Biblical events, but it sure seems to have happened somewhere between the Exodus and King David. One can easily see the events leading to the Exodus being enabled by (or causing, depending on who you ask!) the weakening of Egypt, and the period in Joshua and Judges describes a power vacuum: no centralized king over the area, lots of back-and-forth…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860136&quot; title=&quot;The Exodus is an entirely fictional account though, it&amp;#39;s not based on any real historical events. Even King David seems to be mostly mythical, though there is some vague evidence of a &amp;#39;House of David&amp;#39; being something some real kings claimed descent from. Edit: I should say &amp;#39;almost entirely fictional&amp;#39;. The main scholarly agreement is that it may record some stories of some small numbers (hundreds, at most some thousands - nowhere near the 600k in the Bible) real semitic slaves&amp;#39; escape from Egypt…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860994&quot; title=&quot;We know the Exodus didn&amp;#39;t happen because the supernatural elements described cannot have happened, and there is no evidence of any such mass migration in the archeological record, nor any non-Biblical references to such an event taking place. It may be the case that the Exodus tale is a recontexualization of various historical memories of nomadic resettlement combined with political narrative, but the actual story as described in the actual Bible didn&amp;#39;t happen.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://unstack.io/write-code-like-a-human-will-maintain-it&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Write code like a human will maintain it&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (unstack.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859701&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;350 points · 304 comments · by ScottWRobinson&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Developers should maintain high coding standards when using LLMs because AI models mirror existing patterns, meaning shortcuts and poor practices will be repeated and amplified in future generations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://unstack.io/write-code-like-a-human-will-maintain-it&quot; title=&quot;Title: Write code like a human will maintain it    URL Source: https://unstack.io/write-code-like-a-human-will-maintain-it    Published Time: 2026-07-10T02:51:07Z    Markdown Content:  One of the best things about LLMs is that they&amp;#39;ll write code for you, all day long. Who cares about DRY? You don&amp;#39;t have to be the one updating the same long conditional in four different files - the AI will just do it for you! Right?    I&amp;#39;ve noticed myself letting it slide recently on a project I&amp;#39;d been building with AI.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether AI agents can effectively maintain code quality, with some users advocating for extensive automated checklists to enforce standards &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860210&quot; title=&quot;Write yourself a /review command. That is an empty markdown file at `.claude/commands/review.md`. In it, put a checklist of things the agent should look for. When you’re ready to have your agent review the code, type `/review`. The checklist will be examined and it’ll plan out some findings to ask you if you want them fixed. Mine starts with “Enter plan mode. Examine the differences on this branch vs. main. Consider: ...” and proceeds to a bullet list of things. Any time I notice something in…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860745&quot; title=&quot;I have good results with this prompt after every larger change: Now do a final code check. Is everything tidy and do the components adhere to the principle of separations-of-concerns. Is everything in an understandable and maintainable state? Do we make any assumptions that may not be true anymore? Is any code left over from previous edits or experiments that does not belong into the codebase? Is the documentation still representing the current state of code?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. However, there is significant disagreement regarding the reliability of these tools; critics argue that long instruction lists lead to performance degradation, ignored constraints, and poor abstractions that eventually create &amp;#34;technical debt&amp;#34; for the human to fix &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48863507&quot; title=&quot;My experience is the more things you add to the list, the worse agents perform (I&amp;#39;m not exactly the first person to notice this) I actually have a pretty simple set of instructions right now and Claude still regularly messes them up. Like, my first instructions are: - Never commit to git without permission.      - Never sign commit messages You know what it constantly does? Commits without permissions and signs commit messages! And then I ask it, and it&amp;#39;s like &amp;#39;oh, you&amp;#39;re right, I have that…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48861978&quot; title=&quot;Crazy how many engineers in here just say they are using another prompt on top. From my experience that makes things worse. It does abstractions, but the wrong ones. It overcomments, confusing future calls of the LLM. To me building on multiple scalable systems this has been the most dangerous part of LLMs. On a good codebase it will work good, but it will maek it worse, so you keep using it, till it doesnt work and then you have to pay the bill and fix for what you didn’t build before. If you…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some developers have fully embraced an &amp;#34;AI goes burr&amp;#34; approach where passing tests are the only metric for success &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859984&quot; title=&quot;That sounds like a good idea, but shipping 10x as many features and bugfixes sounds better. I started using AI with the best intentions. Checking everything before committing. Improving output by hand if it didn&amp;#39;t quite follow the existing code style guidelines or variables were not named as well as they should be. Or if it did something sloppy or hacky. Now, AI GOES BURRRRRRRRRRRR! If the tests pass it&amp;#39;s good to ship. AI can deal with the problems it may create. No problems so far.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others warn that LLM-generated comments often break encapsulation or become dangerously outdated, reinforcing the classic adage that code should be written for the next human maintainer &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859886&quot; title=&quot;There is an old quote: &amp;#39;Add comments to your code under the assumption that the next person to maintain it is a homicidal maniac who knows where you live&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860861&quot; title=&quot;Right now the comments that upset me the most are LLM TMI-style comments that break encapsulation by talking about the behavior of specific current callers of a function right above the function definition . I recently reacted angrily in a PR review comment after encountering one for the umpteenth time... that caught me off guard. I didn&amp;#39;t know I was capable of that.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860025&quot; title=&quot;The comments that drive the most homicidal behavior are outdated or inaccurate comments rather than no comments.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.brown.edu/news/2026-07-09/chemical-bonds-relativity&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Einstein&amp;#39;s relativity rules chemical bonds in heavy elements, new research shows&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (brown.edu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48866134&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;406 points · 186 comments · by hhs&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;New research demonstrates that Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity significantly influences the chemical bonding of heavy elements, dictating how their electrons behave and interact at high speeds. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.brown.edu/news/2026-07-09/chemical-bonds-relativity&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.science.org&amp;amp;#x2F;doi&amp;amp;#x2F;10.1126&amp;amp;#x2F;science.aei1285&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.science.org&amp;amp;#x2F;doi&amp;amp;#x2F;10.1126&amp;amp;#x2F;science.aei1285&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the influence of relativity on heavy elements—such as the color of gold—has been recognized for decades, this research highlights how spin-orbit coupling specifically dictates chemical bonding &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48866215&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The increased nuclear mass causes orbiting electrons to speed up to a significant fraction of the speed of light, where the rules of Einstein’s theory of relativity are important. &amp;gt; In the relativistic regime, an electron’s spin — the magnetic moment that points either up or down — and the electron’s orbit are no longer independent of each other, a state known as spin-orbit coupling. Interesting stuff.  I&amp;#39;ve never heard of sigma or pi bonds. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aei1285&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48866710&quot; title=&quot;Wait... wasn&amp;#39;t it already understood that relativity influences electron orbits of heavy elements? I clearly remember being taught some of this in physics, in the mid-noughties. For instance, we know that gold gets its color from relativistic effects. https://physics.aps.org/articles/v10/s3&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters noted that chemistry is often taught through rote memorization and &amp;#34;hand-waving&amp;#34; because the underlying physics is mathematically &amp;#34;superexponential&amp;#34; in difficulty &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48866500&quot; title=&quot;I had incredible difficulties with Chemistry, more than any other subject, because most everything was hand waved away, requiring mostly rote memorization. I could never get an intuitive understanding, partly because my profs seemingly refusing to think about things from a physics perspective. My physics prof was able to help with some of it. It was very odd. If I would have stuck with it, would things have improved?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48866611&quot; title=&quot;Part of the problem is that the difficulty curve becomes, like, superexponential if you try to do the actual math. Fairly elementary atoms require the full theory of quantum mechanics to justify rigorously, and anything more complicated than that requires huge bodies of specialist knowledge on approximation schemes (I assume; I haven&amp;#39;t studied them, but given that helium already requires approximations I&amp;#39;m assuming the trend continues..) Of course, they could still do a much better job useful…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48867274&quot; title=&quot;Not in undergraduate chemistry at least. Maybe chem majors had it different. Organic chemistry 1 was basically rote memorization of various reactions and catalysts and their required conditions. Exam questions would be some organic molecule start and some organic molecule end result and you&amp;#39;d have to draw out each and every intermediary step to get to that end result. Organic chemistry 2 was exactly the same just more reactions to memorize. Biochem was a little easier since the exams didn&amp;#39;t ask…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Consequently, practitioners often rely on &amp;#34;magic coefficients&amp;#34; and specific levels of abstraction to manage the complexity of quantum mechanics and relativistic effects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48866622&quot; title=&quot;Yes and no. It depends which branch of chemistry you world have chosen to go down. Physical Chemistry certainly improves a fair amount of the hand waving, but even there the underlying physics is simplified fairly often (as I understand it — I went straight Physics and dabbled in Chemistry from the other side).&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48866699&quot; title=&quot;As a chemical engineer, one of the signs of maturity was myself and each of my classmates individually coming to accept and embrace the inevitable “magic coefficient”. The curious always wanted to know why some magic coefficient was there. Where did it come from? How is it measured / calculated? How to derive the magic coefficient? Eventually you learn that it’s turtles all the down. You can pick apart the magic coefficient and dive into the nuanced physics that its derived from…but then you…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48866781&quot; title=&quot;The physics that predicts chemistry is about 100 years old. Almost nothing people study up to high-school is that recent, and that modern physics tends to be really hard.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nevo-project.epfl.ch/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI-generated videos to maximally drive a target brain region&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nevo-project.epfl.ch)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48856904&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;292 points · 239 comments · by smusamashah&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Researchers developed NEvo, an AI system that evolves synthetic videos to maximally activate specific brain regions, revealing how visual preferences transition from simple patterns to complex social interactions across the human visual cortex. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nevo-project.epfl.ch/&quot; title=&quot;Title: NEvo: Neural-Guided Evolutionary Video Synthesis    URL Source: https://nevo-project.epfl.ch/    Published Time: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:46:31 GMT    Markdown Content:  What kind of video would make a given part of your visual brain light up the most? **NEvo** answers this _in silico_: it evolves AI-generated videos to maximally drive a target brain region, then uses them to map how visual selectivity becomes increasingly dynamic and social along the lateral stream.    explore the atlas    ## Standard…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the alarming potential for AI-generated media to &amp;#34;row-hammer&amp;#34; the human brain by surgically targeting neural pathways for maximum addiction and manipulation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48858387&quot; title=&quot;This is the absolutely horrific next stage for social media platforms: - They&amp;#39;re already well able to surface the most addictive short video for a specific user out of millions of real videos. - But these millions of real videos are just darts thrown into the space of &amp;#39;videos that could hook the user&amp;#39;, in the end even the best-selected of them is not perfect. - Now, behold! AI allows to generate the perfect video to surgically hit all the switches in the viewer&amp;#39;s brain and turn it into a zombie…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48858962&quot; title=&quot;An anecdote, but some reason to think that overworking part of your brain is a bad idea: I had an Aunt who had dementia. This is obviously a terrible outlook. But her and my Uncle seemed to be doing okay. My Uncle was an ultra-competent guy, highly stable, the person you could rely on; and had been his whole adult life. So it was shocking when he had a mental breakdown and became manic. There was probably something physical going on, but what was also going on was that he had wanted my aunt to…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the technology is intended as a research tool to reduce experimenter bias and deepen our understanding of cognition &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48857699&quot; title=&quot;This is very similar to last week with that mind reading startup thing. Please read the paper before commenting. This is a tool to help researchers in figuring out what different parts of the brain are actually for with less experimenter bias contamination of “well we think maybe it’s about this so let’s show it video of x to see”. The essence runs on having someone sit in a scanner for a couple hours watching all sorts of things, and then feeding that to a model that will then build its own…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others view it as an existential threat to humanity that mirrors the industrial exploitation of nature &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48857335&quot; title=&quot;We are really getting to the point where the tech industry must be stopped if humanity is to continue at all, let alone thrive.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48858399&quot; title=&quot;We are doing to our brains and our children the same thing we are doing to pigs in cages, squezeeing every last cent until the planet burns down.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics warn that this capability will inevitably be weaponized by social media and AI companies for hyper-targeted psychological influence and advertising efficacy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48858649&quot; title=&quot;Social media is not even the worst threat vector, in my opinion. It’s Anthropic/OpenAI/Google, whom people are giving an unprecedented level of access to their innermost thoughts. We have not yet seen* the kind of large-scale, individually targeted psychological manipulation that cloud AI products can deliver. And I have no doubt the likes of Dario Amodei and Sam Altman will show us, if we give them enough time. * I suppose the GPT-4o sycophancy/AI psychosis crisis was a preview, but that was…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48857533&quot; title=&quot;Ads efficacy, of course.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://avi.press/posts/2026-07-10-after-7-years-in-production-scarf-has-reluctantly-moved-away-from-haskell.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;After 7 years in production, Scarf has reluctantly moved away from Haskell&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (avi.press)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859673&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;229 points · &lt;strong&gt;297 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by aviaviavi&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After seven years, Scarf is transitioning its backend from Haskell to Python to better leverage AI coding agents, citing Haskell&amp;#39;s slow compilation times and ecosystem friction as critical bottlenecks that hinder the rapid, parallel development cycles made possible by modern LLMs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://avi.press/posts/2026-07-10-after-7-years-in-production-scarf-has-reluctantly-moved-away-from-haskell.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: After 7 years in production, Scarf has reluctantly moved away from Haskell    URL Source: https://avi.press/posts/2026-07-10-after-7-years-in-production-scarf-has-reluctantly-moved-away-from-haskell.html    Published Time: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 14:36:57 GMT    Markdown Content:  [Avi Press](https://avi.press/index.html) | July 10, 2026    ![Image 1](https://static.scarf.sh/a.png?x-pxid=88710f57-e0e5-4c62-84b8-f3bf70797a81)  —    ## Disclaimer    This has been a hard post to write. I almost didn&amp;#39;t write it…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The decision to move from Haskell to Python for AI-driven development has sparked significant debate, with critics arguing that strong type systems are essential guardrails for unreliable LLM outputs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860109&quot; title=&quot;Wow. Not a Haskell user, but a big user of other languages with expressive type systems (mostly Scala; some Rust). My experience is the complete opposite. I can&amp;#39;t imagine using a language without a good type system to catch all the junk the LLM produces. In fact I thought people would move away from languages from poor type systems, like Python, given the cost of using languages with expressive type systems has decreased with LLMs.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860671&quot; title=&quot;I strongly agree with the premise of this article, which is why I am surprised that the author moved away from Haskell to Python. For some time now it’s felt clear (or at least extremely) compelling that agents need fast compile times in order to be effective, especially when you’re working in parallel. But the other thing that has felt just as obvious is that agents need strong type systems and narrow guardrails in order to constrain their outputs. These two things felt clear enough to me…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860266&quot; title=&quot;exactly, i find the article a wierd take. i would have thougt that being able to catch errors at compile time is the assurance that the LLM generated code is actually decent. so does this mean that the LLM writes code that is so good that the compiler does not find any more errors? or is it due to the nature of haskell that makes it hard to write bad code to begin with? or just that because the haskell compiler catches more errors there is less broken haskell code for the AI to train on? and…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While the author prioritized eliminating compilation friction to speed up the agentic feedback loop &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48867702&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s about the feedback loop being so slow. Agents often compile and run tests to verify their work&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48865986&quot; title=&quot;Main factors were (roughly in order): - None of us are experts in Rust, and we&amp;#39;re all solid at Python. - Rust felt like an under-correction for what we wanted (get all friction in front of the LLM out of the way). - Our high-performance stuff is not being migrated at this time (Scarf Gateway), so we&amp;#39;re just talking about basic CRUD backends here. Basically any language will work.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, commenters suggest that languages like OCaml, Go, or TypeScript offer a better balance of fast iteration and type safety &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860671&quot; title=&quot;I strongly agree with the premise of this article, which is why I am surprised that the author moved away from Haskell to Python. For some time now it’s felt clear (or at least extremely) compelling that agents need fast compile times in order to be effective, especially when you’re working in parallel. But the other thing that has felt just as obvious is that agents need strong type systems and narrow guardrails in order to constrain their outputs. These two things felt clear enough to me…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860766&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve gotten best results with LLMs generating Go, Java, and C# code as they have the best combination of strong type systems and fast or no compile times.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, some users warn that Python’s fragmented tooling and inconsistent type ecosystem can create its own form of friction compared to more cohesive environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860490&quot; title=&quot;Recently had to touch a Python project at work. Just setting up the editor needed me to use 2-3 tools out of: pyright, basedpyright, ruff, ty, mypy, and possibly other tools I&amp;#39;m forgetting that kind of do the same thing but throw errors in different parts of the codebase. Also, for some reason Optional[T] became deprecated, just as the ecosystem finally embraced types ~3 years ago. In fact, one my company&amp;#39;s greenfield projects decided to use TypeScript instead of Python for the [surprisingly]…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/home/en&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;EU Commission: addictive design Instagram and Facebook in breach of the DSA&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ec.europa.eu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48858292&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;276 points · 192 comments · by jeroenhd&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The European Commission has opened formal proceedings against Meta, alleging that the addictive design of Instagram and Facebook, including their algorithms and interface features, violates the Digital Services Act regarding the protection of minors. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/home/en&quot; title=&quot;Press corner    Highlights, press releases and speeches&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on whether the EU’s crackdown on addictive design is a necessary protection for mental health &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48858713&quot; title=&quot;Forcing social media apps to have a less addictive design is a much better way to protect young people&amp;#39;s brains than a social media age limit is (and frankly adults need help here too).&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt; or a paternalistic overreach that threatens free information flow and independent journalism &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48858504&quot; title=&quot;Nothing was ever said about the addictive design of mainstream TV - because then the rulers controlled the message being streamed into the brains of the population. It is precisely on Facebook and Instagram where you find the only popular movements against the current order in Europe, and the citizen journalists who expose and scrutinize the powers. It&amp;#39;s a giant political threat towards those in power. So, how do we keep the good parts and get rid of the bad parts of the free flow of…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859034&quot; title=&quot;This is the same EU commission pushing chat control and VPN bans and passports to access the internet. Which people on HN hate. Yet, when they couch authoritarian action under the premise of a popular moral panic, suddenly the reaction here is “tie us up and tell us what we’re allowed to see daddy.” I really don’t get it. Do you not see how cheering on this social media moral panic and inflating the idea of a big tech “boogieman” leads to emboldening them to do the much worse authoritarian…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue for a total ban on online advertising to eliminate the root cause of &amp;#34;attention-stealing&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48858809&quot; title=&quot;Online advertisements should be forbidden as a whole. The attention-stealing and engagement-maximising internet with all it horribly effects only exist, due to advertising. And we know that the world without online ads is perfectly possible and livable, since we all lived through 1996.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others warn this would collapse the modern internet economy, destroying both &amp;#34;influencer&amp;#34; culture and essential services like local news and navigation tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859746&quot; title=&quot;True but the whole “influencer” and “creative” industry would collapse overnight. A few large ones would survive on their patreon income, most would collapse and have to get a real job, if those are still around.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859906&quot; title=&quot;This is a wild take. Most serious media companies would collapse without online ad revenue. Google would be dead, along with all the products that sorta run the world like maps. But even local publications, like your independent city news site, which you presumably think is good, also die instantly. The ladder is also pulled up behind any kind of independent quality content producers.  You cant run a successful channel without dedicated paid subscribers, and you can&amp;#39;t build a dedicated…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Alternative proposals include mandating user choice between &amp;#34;ethical&amp;#34; and addictive algorithms rather than banning specific designs outright &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860808&quot; title=&quot;this is the wrong approach. they should enforce a choice between addictive and &amp;#39;ethical&amp;#39; algorithms (or even better allow third party feeds), make them transparent with what kind of data they use to personalize and strictly ban any kind of political bias. things like bluesky fyp should always stay legal and not in a gray area. even if someone comes up with a design thats more addictive than hard drugs people should have the option (but never be forced) to use it. if this is about kids then use…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/30/the-father-of-the-internet-is-finally-retiring/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Vint Cerf, “father of the Internet”, is retiring&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techcrunch.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48854168&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;297 points · 169 comments · by compiler-guy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Vinton Cerf, the co-architect of the internet’s foundational TCP/IP protocols, is retiring from his long-standing role as Google’s chief internet evangelist after a career spanning over 50 years. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/30/the-father-of-the-internet-is-finally-retiring/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The ‘Father of the Internet’ is finally retiring    URL Source: https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/30/the-father-of-the-internet-is-finally-retiring/    Published Time: 2026-07-01T03:15:37+00:00    Markdown Content:  Vinton Cerf will step down from his role as Google’s chief internet evangelist next week, marking the conclusion of one of the most influential careers in technology history.    While speaking via video feed at the [Open Frontier conference](https://www.openfrontier.ai/) hosted by the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Vint Cerf is celebrated as a humble and highly impactful legend whose hiring at Google in 2005 marked a &amp;#34;golden age&amp;#34; for the company &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48879644&quot; title=&quot;hah. I was an intern at Google in 2005 when he was hired and remember the wave of reverence that went through Mountain View. Salute to a legend! It’s like two lifetimes in tech years. I remember that summer Google Earth was launched, we were a year removed from the Gmail launch, and I worked on shipping the first Summer of Code.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48879912&quot; title=&quot;wow, that was the golden age of Google.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881733&quot; title=&quot;For all the naysayers in this thread, I gotta say you’re wrong. Vint is a class act. Humble, helpful, and optimistic. Not to mention one of the most impactful computer scientists of our generation.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate the specific terminology of his role in &amp;#34;inventing&amp;#34; the internet, peers emphasize his genuine innovation and his acknowledgment of political figures like Al Gore in enabling the technology&amp;#39;s emergence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48879374&quot; title=&quot;Please don’t post snarky or low-substance comments on HN. As another commenter has pointed out, Vint Cerf himself credits Gore as playing a significant role in enabling the Internet’s emergence. He didn’t claim to have “invented” it.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880090&quot; title=&quot;How many &amp;#39;father&amp;#39;s of the Internet&amp;#39; are there exactly?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48879778&quot; title=&quot;He said he created it though.  It’s a quote you can look up.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Regarding technical regrets, Cerf has reportedly stated that if he could redesign TCP/IP, he would implement 128-bit addresses and end-to-end encryption/authentication &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48879932&quot; title=&quot;I was at a talk where he brought up exactly this (I also once did a talk alongside him, but that&amp;#39;s a different story). He said there would be two changes: 1. It would have 128-bit addresses.  2. It would have end-to-end encryption (or was it authentication, I forget). IPv6 was supposed to fix both of these, with IPsec mandatory, but the latter demand sort of faded out into obscurity. We ended up basically solving encryption by pushing everything into TLS anyway, which I guess solved much of the…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, though others argue the protocol&amp;#39;s simplicity is precisely why it succeeded over more complex alternatives like OSI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48879583&quot; title=&quot;I wonder if he would have designed TCP/IP differently if he&amp;#39;d had the chance to have a second go of it. Maybe having multiple streams within a single connection, like QUIC does, would have been a better choice. Also being able to demarcate message boundaries within the protocol itself, perhaps, instead of it being a simple byte stream.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880036&quot; title=&quot;Doing this brings you close to OSI, which famously failed by being overcomplicated.  The current design was implementable by zillions of cheap humans running cheap hardware. I always wonder if the internet is thesurvivor of the networking cambrian explosion, with a slight roll of the dice making another candidate the winner.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://geohot.github.io//blog/jekyll/update/2026/05/03/punk-or-why-i-dont-stream.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Punk, or why I don&amp;#39;t stream anymore&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (geohot.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859671&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;204 points · &lt;strong&gt;239 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by surprisetalk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;George Hotz explains his decision to stop streaming by critiquing a modern culture of performative spectacle, arguing that AI and social media have eroded individual identity and authentic &amp;#34;hacker&amp;#34; exploration in favor of pre-chewed consumption and corporate-driven conformity. &lt;a href=&quot;https://geohot.github.io//blog/jekyll/update/2026/05/03/punk-or-why-i-dont-stream.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Punk, or why I don’t stream anymore    URL Source: https://geohot.github.io/blog/jekyll/update/2026/05/03/punk-or-why-i-dont-stream.html    Published Time: 2026-05-03T00:00:00-07:00    Markdown Content:  &amp;gt; If you’re the sun, I’m a black hole  &amp;gt;   &amp;gt;  – The Stephen Hawking, Say Anything    What killed the hacker culture I grew up in was spectacle. You can consume it without participating, and even worse it has signaling value. I never did CTFs to put them on my resume. I don’t even have a resume I…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on George Hotz’s (geohot) critique of modern digital superficiality, with some users dismissing his &amp;#34;punk&amp;#34; persona as performative bluster while others defend his technical brilliance as genuinely exceptional &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860370&quot; title=&quot;This lament about the superficiality of publicly oriented endeavors is interesting cause this guy&amp;#39;s life is inseparable from meta commentary. &amp;#39;George Francis Hotz (born October 2, 1989), known online by geohot, is an American security hacker, entrepreneur,[1] and software engineer. He is known for developing iOS jailbreaks,[2][3] reverse engineering the PlayStation 3, and for the subsequent lawsuit brought against him by Sony. From September 2015 until November 2025, he worked on his vehicle…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860398&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; From the early legal controversy to now if there&amp;#39;s one thing we can expect from geohot is that he&amp;#39;s gonna think he&amp;#39;s god&amp;#39;s gift to programming and everyone whose work he disagrees with are losers. As one of many who has seen him doing his thing alongside others, yeah he’d think that. And he’d be right.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860459&quot; title=&quot;lol he is right. his work both on the ps3 and now with the hacked p2p drivers is powering many a lab&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters argue that Hotz’s sense of entrapment by corporate &amp;#34;internet towns&amp;#34; is a choice, suggesting that meaningful human interaction and &amp;#34;old-style&amp;#34; web communities are still accessible through intentional disengagement from smartphones and social media &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860340&quot; title=&quot;I really like this style of writing in short bursts, and I appreciate the author&amp;#39;s tone and concerns. I do wonder if the author is very young. As much as I enjoyed his small essay, a few things stuck right out at me: &amp;gt;I tried having a flip phone once (2014), but you couldn’t find out what time the movies were playing because moviephone just redirected you to their app. This has been a solved problem for a long time: you look up the movie times and such prior to departing for the movies. No…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860413&quot; title=&quot;From the article: &amp;#39;... there is no other Internet, just a place with five corporate towns and some Chinese ones that are really hard to visit if you don’t speak Chinese.&amp;#39; Yeah, that&amp;#39;s only true if you don&amp;#39;t hang out in the old-style Internet. I spend most of my time on blogs, reading and replying to discussions on wide-ranging topics, talking to interesting people who know a lot more than I do about many subjects (in fact, most subjects that aren&amp;#39;t computer programming) The discussion isn&amp;#39;t on…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some find his inability to navigate the world without a phone baffling for a legendary hacker, others note that modern infrastructure increasingly mandates app usage for basic tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860340&quot; title=&quot;I really like this style of writing in short bursts, and I appreciate the author&amp;#39;s tone and concerns. I do wonder if the author is very young. As much as I enjoyed his small essay, a few things stuck right out at me: &amp;gt;I tried having a flip phone once (2014), but you couldn’t find out what time the movies were playing because moviephone just redirected you to their app. This has been a solved problem for a long time: you look up the movie times and such prior to departing for the movies. No…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860755&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;This has been a solved problem for a long time: you look up the movie times and such prior to departing for the movies. No smartphone needed. Strangely, not everyone is at home when they decide to go to the movies.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860485&quot; title=&quot;Ah, sorry, I wasn&amp;#39;t familiar with him. Looks like he was born in 1989, and so is not so young. I&amp;#39;m a bit baffled to hear that he doesn&amp;#39;t think he can escape his smartphone given that he was resourceful enough to jailbreak an iPhone 4 back in the day. I understand he&amp;#39;s speaking poetically and emotionally. Maybe he just means he has the knowledge but not the means.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://casp.ac/reports/ai-enabled-terrorism&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How the terrorist group Boko Haram uses frontier AI&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (casp.ac)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48863707&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;229 points · 206 comments · by imustachyou&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boko Haram has institutionalized the use of frontier AI models like ChatGPT and Gemini to assist in attack planning, weapons troubleshooting, and explosive device design, often circumventing safeguards through training provided by transnational jihadist networks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://casp.ac/reports/ai-enabled-terrorism&quot; title=&quot;Title: “God has helped us, and so will AI”: How the Terrorist Group Boko Haram Uses Frontier AI — CASP    URL Source: https://casp.ac/reports/ai-enabled-terrorism    Markdown Content:  ## Abstract    How are terrorists using AI? Semi-structured interviews with 27 former Boko Haram members conducted in northeast Nigeria in 2025 and 2026 reveal unprecedented detail about AI-assisted terrorist activity primarily through 2024. This report finds that both factions of Boko Haram use frontier AI, including…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are highly skeptical of the report&amp;#39;s claims, arguing that the described AI use cases—such as training for motorcycle jumps that resulted in 18 deaths—sound like &amp;#34;outlandish&amp;#34; fabrications or instances of the researchers being trolled &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48863983&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; We saw in a movie how motorcycles can jump over bridges. We used  AI to learn how to do this. We gave it information, like what  motorcycles we use and the distance we need to jump and so on and it  gave us steps on what we have to do. We practiced a lot and kept  asking questions. We dug holes and filled them with broken glass and  fire to practice. 18 of us died in the process. Eight of us managed to do  it. The next time we attacked, we could jump. Now listen, I&amp;#39;m not saying we need to give…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48864178&quot; title=&quot;I agree with other commenters that the claims made in the report are strange. &amp;gt; We used to rely on our traditional methods. We sent 200 fighters because we had a lot of strength, but then 60 got killed. With the help of AI, we learned that it sometimes makes sense to only send 20. We learned more about well-coordinated attacks and deployment of smaller units. The other quotes and use cases could make sense in terms of using AI jailbreaks to find information more easily, but this one is…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48865126&quot; title=&quot;Honestly this sounds so outlandish that it makes me skeptical of the whole thing. They didn&amp;#39;t stop after the first guy died? Or the tenth? Guy #11 just looked at the pile of corpses and was like, hell yeah I&amp;#39;m gonna try next? And where&amp;#39;s the video? Terrorist groups love propaganda footage, if they were doing motorcycle stunts like Evel Knievel they&amp;#39;d be bragging about it everywhere.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Many users point out that LLMs typically do not provide actionable &amp;#34;embargoed knowledge&amp;#34; for bomb-making beyond what is available on Wikipedia, nor would they suggest lethal training methods involving broken glass and fire &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48863959&quot; title=&quot;You type in the question or use your voice and it [AI] gives you a detailed answer, like ‘How can I build a bomb?’ and then it tells you how. It is like a human robot! We used it a lot. I’m pretty skeptical reading this bit. I’ve seen uncensored or jailbroken LLM replies to these kind of questions, they are never actionable, don’t say anything Wikipedia doesn’t, and are hard to provoke if you’re not using an uncensored model. I have no doubt terrorists are aided by LLMs in a general sense, but…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48864953&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; We dug holes and filled them with broken glass and fire to practice. 18 of us died in the process. Is it providing material aid to terrorists to point out that maybe a hole filled with water would have been a better practice environment?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. This skepticism leads to a debate over whether such reports are &amp;#34;propaganda&amp;#34; designed to justify regulatory capture and &amp;#34;Know Your Customer&amp;#34; (KYC) requirements for AI services &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48864484&quot; title=&quot;AI services will need KYC soon?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48864620&quot; title=&quot;The NYT article is probably propaganda in service of that, that’s what the big AI companies want, it’s part of regulatory capture.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48865064&quot; title=&quot;If the impact of AI is comparable to the atomic bomb then the least they could do is try to filter out terrorists. I think this is a very convincing argument to regulate the space more.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/spider-silk-loses-top-spot-natures-strongest-material-snails-teeth-180954346/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Snails&amp;#39; teeth beats spider silk as nature&amp;#39;s strongest material (2015)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (smithsonianmag.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862252&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;238 points · 168 comments · by simonebrunozzi&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Researchers have discovered that limpet teeth are the strongest natural material on Earth, surpassing spider silk with a tensile strength comparable to high-quality carbon fibers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/spider-silk-loses-top-spot-natures-strongest-material-snails-teeth-180954346/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Snails’ Teeth Beats Spider Silk As Nature’s Strongest Material    URL Source: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/spider-silk-loses-top-spot-natures-strongest-material-snails-teeth-180954346/    Published Time: 2015-02-18T14:22:38-05:00    Markdown Content:  [Skip to main content](https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/spider-silk-loses-top-spot-natures-strongest-material-snails-teeth-180954346/#main-content)    Report Ad![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion primarily critiques the article&amp;#39;s use of &amp;#34;3,300 one-pound bags of sugar&amp;#34; as a measurement of strength, with many users arguing that a &amp;#34;mid-sized car&amp;#34; would be a more relatable comparison &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862434&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; 3,300 one-pound bags of sugar Ah, but how many one pound bags of concrete could it hold?? Why bags of anything?  This is a poor way of communicating weight.  Just say &amp;#39;a modern passenger car&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862757&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Thats’s comparable to a single strand of spaghetti holding up about 3,300 one-pound bags of sugar What an odd example. A mid-sized car would have been much clearer.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some defend the sugar analogy as a tangible unit of weight &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48865016&quot; title=&quot;But everyone knows, by experience, what 3300 individual roughly one pound bags of sugar weighs and what sort of force is needed to hold it up. Mid sized car is ambiguous, and nobody saw anybody hold that up (seeing hulk doesn&amp;#39;t count)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others mock the trend of using unconventional units like football fields &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862456&quot; title=&quot;Sorry I only understand football field based units of measurement&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt; or question the specific state of the reference material, such as whether the spaghetti is cooked or raw &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862719&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Thats’s comparable to a single strand of spaghetti holding up about 3,300 one-pound bags of sugar Is that cooked or raw spaghetti?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, users shared anecdotes about the physical sensation of snail teeth, noting that they feel like sandpaper and are capable of drawing blood &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862621&quot; title=&quot;I wanted to see some pictures, this paper has good ones: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ece3.10332 If you put your finger in front of a garden slug it may try to eat it, it&amp;#39;s a very odd sand-paper sensation but I never knew why.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48863348&quot; title=&quot;Garden snails around seattle will absolutely bite you (teeny tiny bite) and draw blood if you let them crawl around on your skin.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;http://yummymelon.com/devnull/in-emacs-everything-looks-like-a-service.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In Emacs, everything looks like a service&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (yummymelon.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48857230&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;254 points · 110 comments · by kickingvegas&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Emacs functions as a powerful orchestrator that treats external utilities and web APIs as services, allowing users to build custom clients through its extensive built-in libraries and Elisp. &lt;a href=&quot;http://yummymelon.com/devnull/in-emacs-everything-looks-like-a-service.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: In Emacs, Everything Looks Like a Service    URL Source: http://yummymelon.com/devnull/in-emacs-everything-looks-like-a-service.html    Published Time: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:16:02 GMT    Markdown Content:  A common refrain is that Emacs is an operating system (OS). This isn’t true, but what invites comparison to an OS is its ability to orchestrate applications and utilities above the OS kernel level. The diagram below suggests a truer picture of how Emacs’ relates to an OS and its…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether Emacs functions as a pseudo-operating system by orchestrating utilities through Lisp, a comparison some find logically flawed or technically imprecise &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48858325&quot; title=&quot;One of the pivotal moments in my career has been when I used Emacs just enough  to truly understand what &amp;#39;Emacs is an operating system&amp;#39; means, not just as a joke but as something I could believe in&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48858780&quot; title=&quot;But you already had an operating system and you could already code... Did Emacs really give YOU any capability you didn&amp;#39;t have before? Don&amp;#39;t forget this is a text editor, not an IDE or some general purpose automation harness You could add lisp to mspaint and mspaint suddenly becomes awesome somehow? I don&amp;#39;t follow the logic&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48858346&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; A common refrain is that Emacs is an operating system (OS). This isn’t true, but what invites comparison to an OS is its ability to orchestrate applications and utilities above the OS kernel level. Only because Lisp Machines, or variations thereof didn&amp;#39;t took off in the mainstream. &amp;#39;Symbolics Lisp Machine demo&amp;#39; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4-YnLpLgtk &amp;#39;Emacs and Lisp&amp;#39; https://funcall.blogspot.com/2025/04/emacs-and-lisp.html While Emacs was forked by Lucid as XEmacs to make one of the very…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48858377&quot; title=&quot;Even if LISP machines took off, an editor running on them still would not be an OS. Such claims come from people who don&amp;#39;t understand what a platform is and who can conflate any platform with an operating system. You also see these people calling web browsers operating systems. By this flawed definition you could even call things like Roblox an operating system.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Users debate the validity of corporate mandates requiring standardized tools like VS Code, with some arguing it facilitates team mentorship while others view it as an inefficient restriction on personal productivity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859222&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been an Emacs user for over 25 years. But last year I switched employers and they won&amp;#39;t let me use it even for tasks where it would absolutely shine. Their argument is that all team members should use the same tools, and I guess that is a valid point. Unfortunately, I failed to convince my employer to make everybody else switch to Emacs. So, now I&amp;#39;m using lots of one-purpose tools, one for each separate task, a good deal less efficiently than I could use Emacs, and I&amp;#39;m still learning all…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859503&quot; title=&quot;At a company I work for, they are doing various changes (and control) over the software we install as we transition to a larger company. I believe they are using Microsoft Intune so they can allow/deny what can be installed. I have not updated my laptop (or got a new one) because I am concerned they will not allow me to install or continue to use Emacs. Honestly, I can vision how that conversation goes:- [manager]: Hi, so what is Emacs [me]: Emacs is a text editor I use daily and makes me…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859490&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Their argument is that all team members should use the same tools, and I guess that is a valid point. Why is that a valid point?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859583&quot; title=&quot;In my case, I am a very senior member of my team so 25-50% of each day is spent helping and/or teaching teammates. In situations like that, it is useful to be deeply familiar with the tools that your teammates are using so you can tell them exactly what to do. For example, if I&amp;#39;m teaching a new hire to set up their vscode it is not very helpful to tell them &amp;#39;now you need to activate the python venv&amp;#39;. It is much more helpful to be able to tell them &amp;#39;Now we&amp;#39;re going to activate the python venv.…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite its power as a &amp;#34;service&amp;#34; that can run in a client-server model, users note practical limitations, such as difficulties forwarding the server socket over remote connections &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860807&quot; title=&quot;Emacs itself can run as a client and server. To start the server: emacs --daemon Then use `emacsclient` to connect to it. All `emacsclient` instances whether in terminals or GUI are using the same server and can access the same open files and buffers. Unfortunately it only works locally. I&amp;#39;ve tried to forward the emacs server socket over ssh to a remote client and it doesn&amp;#39;t work.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://vfxblog.com/2017/08/23/the-tech-of-terminator-2-an-oral-history/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The tech of &amp;#39;Terminator 2&amp;#39; – an oral history (2017)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (vfxblog.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862365&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;259 points · 92 comments · by markus_zhang&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this oral history, ILM artists and developers detail how they pioneered groundbreaking CGI for *Terminator 2*, inventing tools like &amp;#34;Body Sock&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;Make Sticky&amp;#34; to realize the liquid-metal T-1000. The team overcame massive hardware limitations and nascent software to create the film&amp;#39;s Oscar-winning visual effects. &lt;a href=&quot;https://vfxblog.com/2017/08/23/the-tech-of-terminator-2-an-oral-history/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The tech of ‘Terminator 2’ – an oral history    URL Source: https://vfxblog.com/2017/08/23/the-tech-of-terminator-2-an-oral-history/    Published Time: 2017-08-23T19:48:47+00:00    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: T2_BARS_V1](https://vfxblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/t2_bars_v1.jpg?w=1200&amp;amp;h=675)    Illustration by [Aidan Roberts.](http://www.aidanrobertsillustration.com/)    Ever since James Cameron’s _Terminator 2: Judgment Day_ was released in 1991, I’ve been reading about the many ways ILM,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters highlight *Terminator 2* as a unique cultural phenomenon of the 1990s, noting its unprecedented theater demand and its role in redefining female protagonists through Linda Hamilton’s performance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862874&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not sure that anyone under the age of 45-50 can truly appreciate just how big of a deal Terminator 2 was and how big movie releases can be. Like, nothing in the MCU era or the Star Wars prequels and sequels comes remotely close. Yes, they gross a lot of money but in terms of cultural significance, I&amp;#39;ve seen nothing close. At the time I lived in a city when the local movie theaters would typically run major releases on 1, maybe 2 screens. Session times were like 11am, 2pm, 5pm, 8pm 6 days a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48863304&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; But there was another aspect too and that was Linda Hamilton. This was one of the first mainstream big-budget movies that changed the way women were portrayed in film. Lots of people had posters of her wearing the sunglasses, carrying weapons, etc. It was actually a really big deal. Yes, a strong female character in big budget movies wasn&amp;#39;t a common theme. Aliens 2 also had a strong female protagonist played by Sigourney Weaver. The movie was also directed by James Cameron. Terminator 2 was a…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While the film is celebrated for pioneering CGI, users expressed surprise that many iconic visuals—such as the &amp;#34;liquid metal&amp;#34; bullet impacts and the helicopter flying under a bridge—were actually achieved through dangerous stunts and practical effects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48863241&quot; title=&quot;Can anyone confirm that the helicopter flying over the underpass was actual flying and not VFX or a chopper on a trailer? There are claims that the stunt pilot flew under (twice!), but it seems like no amount of skill could avoid weird uncontrollable effects from rotor wash.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862680&quot; title=&quot;Amazing writeup!  I&amp;#39;ll add that the custom squibs they made for the liquid metal bullet impacts are still one of the best practical effects ever. https://www.reddit.com/r/nextfuckinglevel/comments/v6qjaj/bu...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862722&quot; title=&quot;Holy shit. I thought the bullet splashes were CGI. I&amp;#39;m even more impressed that they were real practical effects, that is indeed nextfuckinglevel&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48863351&quot; title=&quot;I saw claims for that in multiple sources. I think they initially wanted to do CG but it was too hard back then so the pilot did it anyway.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Some participants wished for more technical focus on the film&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;hacking&amp;#34; gadgets, while others noted that a 4K remaster is returning to theaters for the film&amp;#39;s anniversary &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48863515&quot; title=&quot;Disappointed this only focuses on the contemporary technology used in making the (admittedly amazing) visual effects for the film, which has been addressed multiple times across various formats. When I first watched T2 as a kid the thing which grabbed me more was that gadget John Connor uses to hack the ATM and all the cool stuff in the Cyberdyne offices. It would be nice if someone wrote an article discussing that aspect of the film, for the record and posterity&amp;#39;s sake.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48863721&quot; title=&quot;The 4K remaster of this is back in theatres next month for “Judgment Day” and the 35th anniversary. https://www.fathomentertainment.com/news/fathom-entertainmen...&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48863696&quot; title=&quot;And back in theatres this year for the 35th anniversary, in time for Judgement Day (August 29). Trailer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZgIESxakso &amp;#39;The 4K and 3D presentation uses STUDIOCANAL’s acclaimed 2017 restoration and 3D conversion.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ianreppel.org/how-successful-companies-go-blind/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Successful companies go blind&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ianreppel.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859678&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;243 points · 84 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Drawing a parallel to blind cavefish, this article explains how successful companies develop &amp;#34;competence blindness&amp;#34; by prioritizing internal bureaucracy and comfort over the engineering excellence that originally fueled their growth. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ianreppel.org/how-successful-companies-go-blind/&quot; title=&quot;Title: How Successful Companies Go Blind    URL Source: https://ianreppel.org/how-successful-companies-go-blind/    Published Time: 20260709    Markdown Content:  [The Mexican cavefish kept its eye genes for over a million years after the eyes themselves disappeared](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0569-4). Something similar happens to companies once they achieve success.    ## The cave is the variable [](https://ianreppel.org/how-successful-companies-go-blind/#the-cave-is-the-variable)    The Mexican…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether established companies suffer from &amp;#34;blindness&amp;#34; or are simply constrained by structural momentum, risk aversion, and the immense difficulty of scaling &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860900&quot; title=&quot;Currently working at an older style defense company and this fits but I think momentum is a better reference.  There are no financial incentives to risk on new process.  Gatekeepers, siloing, bureaucracy, and risk aversion act to stop and slow. I have worked startups and early stage companies prior and used that experience to force developmental projects and gotten prototypes and patents through the resistance. My coworkers who lack that experience get shut down often before they even start. If…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860489&quot; title=&quot;Most startups fail. Most big company projects are kind of worthless. These are two sides of the same coin. Producing something novel and valuable is HARD. Unbelievably hard. The idea is hard. The building is harder. The scaling and steering and feedback is ego-crushingly hard. When it&amp;#39;s valuable, it&amp;#39;s frequently enormously valuable. That funds the experimentation, the incremental expansion, the waste. It&amp;#39;s hard to really internalize how valuable localization, admin controls, FedRAMP, and…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that bureaucracy and a focus on short-term shareholder value lead to stagnation and &amp;#34;accretion&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860900&quot; title=&quot;Currently working at an older style defense company and this fits but I think momentum is a better reference.  There are no financial incentives to risk on new process.  Gatekeepers, siloing, bureaucracy, and risk aversion act to stop and slow. I have worked startups and early stage companies prior and used that experience to force developmental projects and gotten prototypes and patents through the resistance. My coworkers who lack that experience get shut down often before they even start. If…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860961&quot; title=&quot;I do consulting, I see lots of teams using LLM&amp;#39;s to &amp;#39;speed run to a legacy code base&amp;#39;. Much of what goes on in corporate America is not blindness its accretion. They simply dont have the culture to evolve. The devotion to next quarters numbers and share holder value play a massive part in this.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that large corporations are actually optimizing for stability and monopolistic power rather than novel innovation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860489&quot; title=&quot;Most startups fail. Most big company projects are kind of worthless. These are two sides of the same coin. Producing something novel and valuable is HARD. Unbelievably hard. The idea is hard. The building is harder. The scaling and steering and feedback is ego-crushingly hard. When it&amp;#39;s valuable, it&amp;#39;s frequently enormously valuable. That funds the experimentation, the incremental expansion, the waste. It&amp;#39;s hard to really internalize how valuable localization, admin controls, FedRAMP, and…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48861643&quot; title=&quot;A good example of &amp;#39;founder bias&amp;#39; where big companies are read as not innovating, when in fact their goal is to squeeze as much juice from their user base and strengthen their monopolistic position and pricing power. From the outside it looks like blindness and atrophy but from the inside it&amp;#39;s the main bread and butter. The sighted engineer is also cave adapted, just to a different cave.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable concerns include the role of LLMs in accelerating the creation of legacy code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860404&quot; title=&quot;From what I&amp;#39;ve seen, LLMs just accelerate or compound this whole process as well. Everyone has the same group think, it bleeds into the way the LLM generates code and ultimately it just rots teams.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860961&quot; title=&quot;I do consulting, I see lots of teams using LLM&amp;#39;s to &amp;#39;speed run to a legacy code base&amp;#39;. Much of what goes on in corporate America is not blindness its accretion. They simply dont have the culture to evolve. The devotion to next quarters numbers and share holder value play a massive part in this.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt; and the &amp;#34;founder bias&amp;#34; that mistakes necessary corporate maintenance for a lack of intelligence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860489&quot; title=&quot;Most startups fail. Most big company projects are kind of worthless. These are two sides of the same coin. Producing something novel and valuable is HARD. Unbelievably hard. The idea is hard. The building is harder. The scaling and steering and feedback is ego-crushingly hard. When it&amp;#39;s valuable, it&amp;#39;s frequently enormously valuable. That funds the experimentation, the incremental expansion, the waste. It&amp;#39;s hard to really internalize how valuable localization, admin controls, FedRAMP, and…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48861643&quot; title=&quot;A good example of &amp;#39;founder bias&amp;#39; where big companies are read as not innovating, when in fact their goal is to squeeze as much juice from their user base and strengthen their monopolistic position and pricing power. From the outside it looks like blindness and atrophy but from the inside it&amp;#39;s the main bread and butter. The sighted engineer is also cave adapted, just to a different cave.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-07-09</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-07-09</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openai.com/index/gpt-5-6/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GPT-5.6&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (openai.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48849066&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1550 points&lt;/strong&gt; · &lt;strong&gt;1101 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by logickkk1&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI has released GPT-5.6, accompanied by new technical documentation, safety reports, and developer guides for the latest model. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openai.com/index/gpt-5-6/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;deploymentsafety.openai.com&amp;amp;#x2F;gpt-5-6&amp;amp;#x2F;gpt-5-6.pdf&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;deploymentsafety.openai.com&amp;amp;#x2F;gpt-5-6&amp;amp;#x2F;gpt-5-6.pdf&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;developers.openai.com&amp;amp;#x2F;api&amp;amp;#x2F;docs&amp;amp;#x2F;guides&amp;amp;#x2F;latest-model&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;developers.openai.com&amp;amp;#x2F;api&amp;amp;#x2F;docs&amp;amp;#x2F;guides&amp;amp;#x2F;latest-model&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;x.com&amp;amp;#x2F;levie&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2075287443411222628&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 release introduces &amp;#34;Sol,&amp;#34; the first frontier model to beat an ARC-AGI-3 game, alongside a shift toward shorter prompts that significantly reduce costs and token usage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48849198&quot; title=&quot;The developer&amp;#39;s guide ( https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/latest-model ) has some interesting semantic tips for using the model: &amp;gt; Intent understanding: GPT-5.6 can better infer the user’s underlying goal and intended level of work without you specifying every step. Continue to state important constraints, approval boundaries, and success criteria explicitly. &amp;gt; Original image detail: GPT-5.6 preserves the original dimensions of images sent with original or auto detail instead of…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48849608&quot; title=&quot;GPT-5.6 Sol sets a new SOTA on ARC-AGI-3: 7.8% Sol is the first verified frontier model to ever beat an ARC-AGI-3 game https://arcprize.org/results/openai-gpt-5-6&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. However, users are frustrated by new prompting requirements for brevity, arguing that replacing simple &amp;#34;be concise&amp;#34; instructions with complex prioritization logic is counterintuitive and places an undue burden on the prompter &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48849393&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Avoid generic brevity instructions That part is confusing because it&amp;#39;s not like they provide an example of how default GPT-5.6 output compares with GPT-5.5 both with default output and prompted for brevity.  Whenever I use such prompts, it&amp;#39;s usually because I want the model to give me the gist in a few sentences.  I&amp;#39;d be stunned if GPT-5.6 was that concise by default.  I would think that could &amp;#39;break&amp;#39; a lot of things for developers who didn&amp;#39;t know to make prompt changes after upgrading to…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48849543&quot; title=&quot;It seems like the way brevity instructions have changed is mis-aligned with how most people would expect to use them or are currently using them. Here&amp;#39;s the example they give: &amp;gt; Instead of asking for the shortest possible answer, replace brevity instructions with prioritization: &amp;gt; Lead with the conclusion. Include the evidence needed to support it, any material  caveat, and the next action. Omit secondary detail and repetition. &amp;gt; Keep all required facts, decisions, caveats, and next steps. Trim…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some developers find OpenAI’s focus on token efficiency superior to Anthropic’s &amp;#34;token-maxing&amp;#34; approach, others remain confused by the &amp;#34;Luna, Terra, Sol&amp;#34; naming conventions and the ongoing debate over whether Codex or Claude Code offers a more reliable developer experience &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48849126&quot; title=&quot;Ok long time Claude Code user here; lately I&amp;#39;ve started to realize there&amp;#39;s other great models out there I should be trying, but I&amp;#39;m hesitant to leave Claude Code behind for something new. What&amp;#39;s the consensus today on codex vs claude code, does it really matter anymore?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48849401&quot; title=&quot;Codex has arguably been better than Claude Code for months now, but it&amp;#39;s flown under the radar because it just didn&amp;#39;t capture the same viral marketing effect and OpenAI in general has had more optics / PR issues than Anthropic amongst the online developer crowd. I use the word &amp;#39;better&amp;#39; not in the sense that the underlying GPT models are fundamentally smarter or more intelligent, but rather that as a product Codex is just simpler, cheaper, and abundantly reliable and low-drama.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48849598&quot; title=&quot;I really wish there was just an easy guide on when to use Sol vs Terra vs Luna, and it just moves further into confusing territory when it comes to naming. The naming convention is especially difficult to decipher depending on what your native language is. Of course a latin language speaker might be able to easily determine oh yeah each one is slightly bigger than the other but I still think it borderlines too confusing. That aside all the numbers look amazing, and I&amp;#39;ll be happy to probably…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/eu-parliament-greenlights-chat-control-1-0-breyer-our-children-lose-out/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (patrick-breyer.de)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48843923&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1625 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 853 comments · by rapnie&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The European Parliament has authorized the &amp;#34;Chat Control 1.0&amp;#34; interim regulation until 2028, allowing tech companies to continue the suspicionless mass scanning of unencrypted private messages for child abuse material despite a majority of voting members opposing the measure. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/eu-parliament-greenlights-chat-control-1-0-breyer-our-children-lose-out/&quot; title=&quot;Title: EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0 – Breyer: &amp;#39;Our children lose out&amp;#39;    URL Source: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/eu-parliament-greenlights-chat-control-1-0-breyer-our-children-lose-out/    Published Time: 2026-07-09T12:40:29+02:00    Markdown Content:  Today, the European Parliament allowed the suspicionless mass scanning of private communications (“Chat Control 1.0”) to pass, a measure it had rejected twice in March. Although a majority of voting Members of the European Parliament…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The European Parliament’s approval of Chat Control 1.0 has sparked intense criticism regarding the use of &amp;#34;urgent procedures&amp;#34; to bypass democratic opposition, as the motion to reject the law failed despite a majority of present MEPs voting against it &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48844437&quot; title=&quot;This is a nice piece of democracy right here: &amp;#39;a measure it had rejected twice in March. Although a majority of voting Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) actually opposed the regulation (314 against, 276 in favor, 17 abstentions), the motion to reject it failed to secure the required absolute majority of 361 votes. As a result, mass scanning is now permitted again until 2028.&amp;#39; &amp;#39;Oh no we can&amp;#39;t get a majority to pass the law!&amp;#39; &amp;#39;Have you tried getting a majority to not pass the law?&amp;#39; &amp;#39;Worth…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48850489&quot; title=&quot;Not only was Chat Control 1.0 already rejected twice by the European Parliament but: - This vote took place on last day of the session when many MEPs had already left for Summer vacation - 112 MEPs of 719 didn&amp;#39;t vote. - The vote was called only two days before as an &amp;#39;Rule 170 - Urgent procedure&amp;#39; - 73 MEPs missed the vote making it &amp;#39;urgent&amp;#39;. Normally it takes months of procedure to come up for a final vote.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Commentators argue this maneuver, scheduled on the final day before summer break when many representatives were absent, exemplifies &amp;#34;blame-laundering&amp;#34; and structural failures within the EU &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48844102&quot; title=&quot;Roberta Metsola&amp;#39;s actions this week jeopardise the legitimacy of the EU project as a whole. It&amp;#39;s clear that member countries use the EU as a blame-laundering mechanism to pass domestically unpopular laws, but the forcing of this vote under the urgency procedure that requires absolute majority to reject, on the last EP session before summer break is so blatant that it might awaken people that might&amp;#39;ve overlooked the structural failures of the EU and finally radicalise them EDIT: bad wording,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48850489&quot; title=&quot;Not only was Chat Control 1.0 already rejected twice by the European Parliament but: - This vote took place on last day of the session when many MEPs had already left for Summer vacation - 112 MEPs of 719 didn&amp;#39;t vote. - The vote was called only two days before as an &amp;#39;Rule 170 - Urgent procedure&amp;#39; - 73 MEPs missed the vote making it &amp;#39;urgent&amp;#39;. Normally it takes months of procedure to come up for a final vote.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48850805&quot; title=&quot;So 112 MEPs didn&amp;#39;t do their job...got it.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While the law allows US tech giants to scan unencrypted private messages and emails without warrants, some users note that end-to-end encrypted services currently remain exempt &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48844238&quot; title=&quot;FTA: What changes with the return of Chat Control 1.0—and what stays the same: *What is coming back:*   US tech companies are once again allowed to scan private messages without a warrant or prior suspicion. This affects direct messages on platforms like Instagram, Discord, Snapchat, Skype, and Xbox, as well as emails via Google’s Gmail and Apple’s iCloud. *What remains unchanged:*    Public social media posts and files hosted in cloud storage could already be scanned without this law.…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. The sudden rush to pass unpopular legislation has led to speculation about motives ranging from preparing for potential conflict to suppressing dissent amidst rising political tensions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845030&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m really surprised at the hurry. The EU, and many EU governments, have been ramming through deeply unpopular legislation at a breakneck pace for no apparent reason, lately. It feels like the last turn in a board game where everyone is busy taking points  with no regard for the impact of the decisions on the theoretical next turn - because there is no next turn. Its really weird. &amp;gt; blame-laundering mechanism Also, I&amp;#39;m stealing this.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845673&quot; title=&quot;for no apparent rason? the way they are preparing to bring the population into a war hardly can be any more apparent...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845599&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;for no apparent reason, lately. for some godforsaken reason left-lib parties in europe think accepting infinity migrants forever is the most important thing to do this is becoming more and more unpopular with the voters, leading to right wing parties surging across europe (Denmark, which has an immigration restrictionist left wing government doesnt seem to have an issue here, true mystery) obviously the solution here is total control of the internet, so that you can suppress dissent&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/malisper/pgrust&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Postgres rewritten in Rust, now passing 100% of the Postgres regression tests&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48841676&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;815 points · 721 comments · by SweetSoftPillow&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pgrust is a new Rust-based rewrite of PostgreSQL that is disk-compatible with version 18.3 and passes 100% of its 46,000+ regression tests. Developed using AI-assisted programming, the project aims to modernize Postgres internals with features like multithreading and built-in connection pooling. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/malisper/pgrust&quot; title=&quot;GitHub - malisper/pgrust: Postgres rewritten in Rust, now passing 100% of the Postgres regression tests    Postgres rewritten in Rust, now passing 100% of the Postgres regression tests - malisper/pgrust    [Skip to content](#start-of-content)    ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [Sign in](/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fmalisper%2Fpgrust)    Appearance settings    * Platform      + AI CODE CREATION      - [GitHub CopilotWrite better code with AI](https://github.com/features/copilot)      -…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The project author highlights that this LLM-assisted rewrite achieves significant performance gains over Postgres, including a 300x speedup in analytical workloads and a shift to a thread-per-connection model &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48843148&quot; title=&quot;Hey author here. Wasn&amp;#39;t expecting to see this up. To concisely give an overview of the project, I&amp;#39;ve been experimenting with using LLMs to build a better version of Postgres. Postgres is 30 years old and we&amp;#39;ve learned a lot about databases since hten. A lot of the techniques that work for doing a rewrite are also useful for doing a rearchitecture. I&amp;#39;m now working on a new, not yet published version of pgrust that incorporates a lot of techniques. Currently the new version: - Passes 100% of…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that performance should be prioritized over the safety of legacy process-based extensions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48853144&quot; title=&quot;If it&amp;#39;s a choice between performance and being able to &amp;#39;safely&amp;#39; run sketchy extensions, I&amp;#39;d rather have performance.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that passing regression tests cannot replace the &amp;#34;production scars&amp;#34; and reliability earned through decades of real-world use &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48842167&quot; title=&quot;I start to see a lot of these re-writes that depend on tests to state that its working. But the things that make software like Postgres and SQLite reliable are not mostly the test, but the real world production scars. That&amp;#39;s where the reliability comes from, years and years of running in production.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48842229&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; not mostly the test, but the real world production scars Most extensive test suites are exactly production scars: every time you have a bug or a regression, you write a test that confirms correct behaviour. SQLite is a good example to bring up because its extensive closed-source tests are what’s often cited as being what keeps people from forking it. (Turso did it, though, but it takes a company to deliver some guarantee of equivalent diligence.) And yes, years and years of running.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics also expressed skepticism regarding the maintainability of AI-generated codebases with thousands of commits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48842635&quot; title=&quot;How would one go about reviewing a piece of code like this? One of the things I&amp;#39;d typically do is peek at the commit history. Seeing what people worked on and how they did it tends to say a lot about a project. But with LLMs generating 7101 commits in less than a month that isn&amp;#39;t feasible. Even looking at a single day is way too much [1]. It probably also doesn&amp;#39;t make sense since the commits content won&amp;#39;t tell you much anyway. ps. How do you easily get to the first commit in a repo on GitHub?…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt; and questioned the engineering value of &amp;#34;rewritten in Rust&amp;#34; projects beyond academic interest &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48842352&quot; title=&quot;Why should a developer use this for anything beyond a pet project? Just because it is written in Rust? All these &amp;#39;rewritten in rust&amp;#39; projects only reinforce the idea that a significant part of the rust community consists of software talibans and not of engineers who must deliver something that works and is reliable over time.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48842162&quot; title=&quot;I feel like we need to heavily differentiate between a rewrite and an AI rewrite.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://18words.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: 18 Words&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (18words.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845049&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1143 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 357 comments · by pompomsheep&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18 Words is a daily web-based word challenge that tasks players with surviving a sequence of 18 words using limited hints and letter reveals. &lt;a href=&quot;https://18words.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: 18 Words - Daily Word Challenge    URL Source: https://18words.com/    Warning: This is a cached snapshot of the original page, consider retry with caching opt-out.    Markdown Content:  ⏳    # 18 Words    Can you survive the 18 words challenge?    #26 | 10 Jul 2026 Play now     Reveal letter (3) Use a hint    ## Paused    Resume Restart    Share score Challenge friend    Practice again Relax again Play Archive    Thanks for playing! You can send me feedback or try my other game…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users generally praised the game&amp;#39;s clean, &amp;#34;Classic Web&amp;#34; design but expressed significant frustration with the timer, suggesting a &amp;#34;Relax Mode&amp;#34; to remove time pressure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845503&quot; title=&quot;The timer makes it not enjoyable for me. It seems necessary to the game design and I’m not being negatively critical. Just sharing an additional perspective. I’ve been playing Zanagrams and the ability to hide the clock really improved my enjoyment of that game. If I could magically get a feature by request, it would be to give me infinite time even if that meant my score came with an asterisk.  Maybe just call it Relax Mode vs. Challenge Mode. By the way: I really like the overall design of…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845642&quot; title=&quot;Yep, instead of feeling like a fun puzzle the timer just adds unnecessary pressure and gets me really annoyed.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. A major point of contention is the word list; while some players find it annoying when valid dictionary words are rejected &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845300&quot; title=&quot;Pretty frustrating when you find a word, but it&amp;#39;s not THE word. Pretty fun otherwise.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845341&quot; title=&quot;tbh this should accept all dictionary matches&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, the creator argues that a curated list prevents &amp;#34;randomly spamming&amp;#34; obscure combinations to win &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845380&quot; title=&quot;Did you find a word that wasn&amp;#39;t accepted you thought should be? I do have another version where it accepts ANY word but I found it quite unsatisfying when I survived by randomly spamming combinations and finding a really obscure word. So am currently running it against a 20,000 word wordlist instead of my larger 300,000 wordlist&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845723&quot; title=&quot;My guy that’s the whole point of the game. Otherwise it’s too easy&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, players requested keyboard support to ensure the game tests pattern recognition rather than mouse speed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48847920&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m totally fine with the  way it works, because, well, it&amp;#39;s a game, losing should be losing. I mean, I kinda want to continue, but I&amp;#39;m glad I&amp;#39;m not allowed to. I didn&amp;#39;t make it. There will be another chance tomorrow. But I&amp;#39;d like to propose allowing keyboard input. Losing because of your mouse skills in a pattern recognition game is annoying.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://andrewkelley.me/post/my-thoughts-bun-rust-rewrite.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;My thoughts on the Bun Rust rewrite&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (andrewkelley.me)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48843352&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;785 points · 692 comments · by kristoff_it&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Zig creator Andrew Kelley argues that Bun&amp;#39;s rewrite from Zig to Rust was driven by a breakdown in professional relationships and poor engineering practices rather than language limitations, expressing relief that the Zig project is no longer associated with Bun’s venture-backed &amp;#34;grind&amp;#34; culture and technical debt. &lt;a href=&quot;https://andrewkelley.me/post/my-thoughts-bun-rust-rewrite.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: My Thoughts on the Bun Rust Rewrite    URL Source: https://andrewkelley.me/post/my-thoughts-bun-rust-rewrite.html    Published Time: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 23:29:33 GMT    Markdown Content:  Context: [Rewriting Bun in Rust](https://bun.com/blog/bun-in-rust)    ## History    When Jarred joined the Zig community about 5 years ago, I described him as someone who had strong &amp;#39;beginner energy&amp;#39;. That is, he moved fast and tried a lot of different stuff, jumping head first into problems that he was not yet…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The response to Andrew Kelley’s critique of the Bun Rust rewrite is sharply divided, with many users condemning the post as an unprofessional personal attack that prioritizes ideological purity over the language&amp;#39;s growth &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48844355&quot; title=&quot;This is unprofessional and embarrassing for Zig. I know very little about Jared but his article yesterday, which I read, seemed appreciative of Zig. I now learn he&amp;#39;s donated significant chunks of money to them. This entire article is publicly and personally attacking him for choosing a different product. It&amp;#39;s insane to me that Andrew thinks this post will somehow exonerate Zig when it really just makes them look childish. Or maybe he doesn&amp;#39;t care, and just wants to attack Jarred?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48844289&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Two, I actually don&amp;#39;t have any personal criticisms of Jarred That’s quite a statement to make at the end of a post that seems to contain little else…all just thinly veiled. Saying someone has „beginner energy“ but reframing it as a faux positive (this person fails  and thus learns) Or saying the grapevine says someone is a „stinky manager“? Basically I’m not saying this person is bad it’s just that I need to bring up on this blog that everyone agrees this person is bad. All seems to be in…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48844448&quot; title=&quot;There are astute comments about the post&amp;#39;s tone elsewhere in this thread[0] But this killed my hopes for Zig. The drama is fun, and Andrew is maybe even admirable in his earnest, but this just isn&amp;#39;t the kind of professionalism needed for a serious project. I know that&amp;#39;s boring and uninspired, but that&amp;#39;s what I want my tech stack and it&amp;#39;s management to be. Also, maybe Jarred was a net negative, but bun was also a really big project using Zig, and the project leaving isn&amp;#39;t as good for Zig as…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some defend the post as an authentic, non-corporate discourse that raises valid technical points &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48844469&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s kind of strange to not engage with any of the points made in the article. Unlike you, I don&amp;#39;t think the post makes them look childish at all. I think it raises a lot of valid points and makes me want to use Zig more.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48844834&quot; title=&quot;How is it unprofessional when it is simply someone giving their honest personal opinion on an issue that involves something that is valuable to them, on their personal blog nonetheless. Is everyone a walking and talking brand now so that they have to always filter their words, walk on eggshells, hide behind corpo-speak so as to seem &amp;#39;professional&amp;#39;? More honest discourse is required in today&amp;#39;s world, not less. It seems interactions online are becoming less and less authentic.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that publicizing &amp;#34;grapevine&amp;#34; insults about management style and &amp;#34;writing slop&amp;#34; reflects poorly on Zig’s leadership &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48844868&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s kind of strange to not engage with any of the points made in the article. Unlike you, I don&amp;#39;t think the post makes them look childish at all. I think it raises a lot of valid points and makes me want to use Zig more. I know nothing about the drama here other than what&amp;#39;s in the blog post, but these feel more like unnecessarily public personal attacks which don&amp;#39;t really reflect well: - a stinky manager. Poor communication, unrealistic expectations, low empathy, no experience. Just a total…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48844289&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Two, I actually don&amp;#39;t have any personal criticisms of Jarred That’s quite a statement to make at the end of a post that seems to contain little else…all just thinly veiled. Saying someone has „beginner energy“ but reframing it as a faux positive (this person fails  and thus learns) Or saying the grapevine says someone is a „stinky manager“? Basically I’m not saying this person is bad it’s just that I need to bring up on this blog that everyone agrees this person is bad. All seems to be in…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Jarred Sumner specifically disputed claims of &amp;#34;fabrication&amp;#34; regarding Bun&amp;#39;s testing practices, providing pull requests to prove they were indeed fuzzing their Zig code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845652&quot; title=&quot;I have learned so much reading Andrew’s code and as I said in the original post: Bun would never have  happened without Zig. &amp;gt; The post claims they were fuzzing their Zig code, while during our calls the whole Bun team told us that they were not fuzzing anything. This appears to be an outright fabrication. Fuzzilli integration: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/pull/24826 Merged PRs fixing issues Fuzzilli found in Bun’s Zig code: - https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/pull/28926 -…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/JustVugg/colibri&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Getting GLM 5.2 running on my slow computer&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48842459&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;912 points · 231 comments · by vforno&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer created Colibrì, a C-based engine that enables the 744B parameter GLM 5.2 model to run on standard laptops without a GPU by streaming routed experts from disk to RAM. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/JustVugg/colibri&quot; title=&quot;A few days ago I found myself trying out GLM 5.2 and was really positively impressed. The capabilities and security I was getting from this LLM are similar to those I&amp;amp;#x27;ve gotten from models like Claude or GPT, and this really surprised me.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;But then I thought, &amp;amp;quot;I wonder how it would work on a normal computer like mine,&amp;amp;quot; and above all, &amp;amp;quot;I wonder if it would work without going into OOM on a computer like mine.&amp;amp;quot; So I started working with the help of agents to test this…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The project&amp;#39;s ability to run large models on consumer hardware has sparked debate over the utility of slow inference speeds, with some arguing that 0.1 tokens/second is unusable while others suggest that &amp;#34;overnight&amp;#34; processing or ticket-based interfaces could make slow local models practical &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48852349&quot; title=&quot;My main question is whether when put into practical use, this can be measured in tokens/second, or more like 1 token per minute...   I have seen locally hosted LLM that are as slow as 1 tok/second still be very useful if you give it a project to do something overnight and metaphorically walk away from it, check back with what it has done in 6 or 8 hours. 0.05 to 0.1 tok/s on the other hand, as reported in the URL for the lowest class of hardware, isn&amp;#39;t really usable for much. edit: I think this…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48853807&quot; title=&quot;I’ve been wondering if chat is the wrong interface for slower local models (and some projects) and maybe something like a ticket system is a better fit. I just decided how I would test this idea on my available hardware before I go drop money on a Mac Studio or GPUs. I’ll probably have a POC this week. There is nothing novel here, just need to spend the time to get it working for me.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Users expressed significant concern regarding SSD wear caused by heavy random reads and OS page cache behavior, leading to suggestions for using external &amp;#34;burner&amp;#34; storage or read-only partitions to protect hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48853226&quot; title=&quot;I am curious if it&amp;#39;s possible to adjust this to use more RAM, as i&amp;#39;ve got a machine with 64GB RAM and 24GB VRAM. Or perhaps I could run Gemma/Qwen on the GPU and have GLM-5.2 delegate smaller tasks to it. It might take some retraining of GLM-5.2 I&amp;#39;m also curious if you can speed this up by using many disks in parallel to increase bandwidth. &amp;gt;SSD Wear Warning &amp;gt; Cold starts are heavy on random reads (~11 GB/token). Reads themselves are safe, but the OS page cache can generate writes. Heavy use…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48853358&quot; title=&quot;The page has an SSD wear warning [0] I use desktop PCs that I build from components so I can replace the SSD, but what do users with soldered SSD do? Just avoid these applications or forge ahead disregarding the possible early burnout of their storage? They must use external storage as the burner SSD. [0] https://github.com/JustVugg/colibri#ssd-wear-warning&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While there is optimism about running current state-of-the-art models on affordable hardware by 2028, some commenters noted that &amp;#34;ordinary&amp;#34; hardware requirements are already increasing and user expectations for model intelligence may inflate over time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48854314&quot; title=&quot;The funny thing is Claude Cowork has taught me to be patient with response timelines. I’m now figuring I’ll be running locally no later than 2028. (I want to spend no more than $10k. And I want to run a model comparable to today’s SOTA.)&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48854514&quot; title=&quot;Today&amp;#39;s SOTA also sounds totally sufficient to me, but I wonder how much our standards will inflate by 2028. Maybe a lot, maybe not at all...very hard to say.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48853795&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; on hardware that ordinary people can afford These days, can &amp;#39;ordinary people&amp;#39; afford 24GB of ram and half a TB of NVME ssd? sigh&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mwi.westpoint.edu/the-glass-backbone-why-the-armys-logistics-will-break-in-the-next-war/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The glass backbone: Why the Army&amp;#39;s logistics will break in the next war&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mwi.westpoint.edu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845442&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;462 points · &lt;strong&gt;667 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by baud147258&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The U.S. Army faces a critical strategic vulnerability as its logistics model, optimized for uncontested environments, lacks the survivability and decentralized architecture required to sustain high-intensity combat against peer adversaries equipped with long-range precision fires and persistent surveillance. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mwi.westpoint.edu/the-glass-backbone-why-the-armys-logistics-will-break-in-the-next-war/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Glass Backbone: Why the Army’s Logistics Will Break in the Next War - Modern War Institute    URL Source: https://mwi.westpoint.edu/the-glass-backbone-why-the-armys-logistics-will-break-in-the-next-war/    Published Time: 2026-06-03T04:10:21-04:00    Markdown Content:  The United States Army spent the last two decades optimizing sustainment for permissive environments defined by uncontested supply lines, contractor support, and static forward operating bases. As the National Defense…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion emphasizes that modern warfare has shifted the &amp;#34;logistical tail&amp;#34; from a bureaucratic afterthought to a primary target, rendering traditional &amp;#34;tooth-to-tail&amp;#34; ratios obsolete &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845678&quot; title=&quot;A very insightful, and correct, piece. I&amp;#39;ll quote in full the following, which I think gets to the heart of the matter. If you have no push, you can&amp;#39;t apply pressure to the point. &amp;gt; The notion that amateurs talk tactics and professionals talk logistics is frequently discussed in military academies and war colleges, yet it is rarely reflected in the Army’s budget requests or modernization priorities. The outdated concept of the tooth-to-tail ratio, which implies the logistical tail is a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that the U.S. could bypass traditional supply line vulnerabilities through orbital delivery systems like Starship &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48850288&quot; title=&quot;China has missed their window of opportunity, sadly. For the next big war, the US will simply not even need to air or sea to deliver weapons or supplies (see SpaceX&amp;#39;s StarFall, of which 60x4 should fit into Starship). Per my calculations, the JDAM version of this will be cheaper than flying planes (and pilots) to drop bombs or cruise missiles. For small(er) wars, cheap drones break everything as they can destroy your backfield. Unless of course you happen to move your backfield into orbit and…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others warn that losing access to Chinese commodity supply chains would cripple the production of essential drone components and electronics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48848555&quot; title=&quot;You also have to ponder how it looks when you remove the Chinese supply chain for all those commodity parts. Which will almost certainly be the case if we decide to punch that dance card. Having a boundless cornucopia of servos and radios will affect the shape of your logistics/maintenance/fabrication complex. That&amp;#39;s not just a &amp;#39;Ukraine Problem&amp;#39; either.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. A point of contention exists regarding the &amp;#34;slow drip&amp;#34; nature of current conflicts; some users question why nations avoid total industrial annihilation of the &amp;#34;tail&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48849848&quot; title=&quot;It is kind of interesting seeing the ukraine war tiptoe from actually striking the tail in earnest. We see some attacks on moscow refineries in recent days, yes, but why not full scale targeting of total industrial collapse of the russian state? Similarly, why doesn&amp;#39;t Kyiv look like Gaza? I guess ukraine doesn&amp;#39;t want to be slapped equally hard. We see this in the iran war too. Small scale, targeted attacks to some cherry pieces of infrastructure to make headlines and perhaps bring people to the…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48849916&quot; title=&quot;People assumed Russia would press with their full might and that has just yet to ever happen. Why don&amp;#39;t they carpet bomb all of the ukraine? Why not fire off a littany of missiles? Why not conscript the bulk of their manpower reserves and actually invade in earnest? Everyone assumed the war would be over in two weeks, because it really could have ended in two weeks if russia went full throttle early on. But there must be some factors at play that prevent total war from seeming like an…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, while others highlight Ukraine&amp;#39;s success with decentralized, market-driven procurement as a necessary innovation for modern logistics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845922&quot; title=&quot;One of the most interesting innovations in the Ukraine war is their internal market place for drones, letting each drone group decide which drones they want to procure and use in battle. It is not a top-down decision, production and supply  as other armies use for their weapons logistics.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ai-2040.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI 2040: Plan A&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ai-2040.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48848425&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;390 points · &lt;strong&gt;515 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by kschaul&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#34;Plan A&amp;#34; is a proposed policy framework and scenario analysis advocating for an international agreement between the U.S. and China to delay superintelligence until 2040 through research transparency and compute guardrails to avoid human extinction or global dictatorship. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ai-2040.com/&quot; title=&quot;AI 2040: Plan A    A detailed forecast and recommendation for how the US, China and the rest of the world should navigate superintelligence.    ## [AI 2040](/)    # Plan A    ≡[PDF](/AI-2040.pdf)    [Supplements](/supplements)    Plan A Basics    [FAQFAQ](/supplements/faq)[How Plan A solves our 5 biggest problemsHow Plan A solves our 5 biggest problems](/supplements/how-plan-a-solves-our-5-biggest-problems)    Plan A Policies    [Covert AI ProjectsCovert AI Projects](/supplements/covert-ai-projects)[Verification…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion is sharply divided between those who view AI projections as &amp;#34;religious fervor&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;expensive astrology&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48870145&quot; title=&quot;This is religious fervor folks, as AI 2027 was. I grew up in evangelical christianity, and to them the end of the world is just around the corner, the same way it has been since I was a small child and likely will be when we are all gone. This isn&amp;#39;t science. This isn&amp;#39;t hypothesis experiment record results. This is very expensive astrology, shiny rock collecting, ritualistic meaning-making and self-justification. Yall, with your incredible wealth and resources you could do real good in this…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; and those who argue that dismissing the possibility of artificial general intelligence (AGI) is unscientific given that the human brain is a physical, reproducible system &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48871060&quot; title=&quot;Or you deeply suffer from normalcy bias. Not believing that AGI is possible is irrational and unscientific imo, the human brain exists, it is not made of magic, it can reproduced. It is as simple as that.   We can debate about timelines, architectures that may lead us there, etc... You can even talk all day long about definitions of AGI, and people waste  their time doing that.  But saying that the human brain cognitive capabilities cannot be reproduced on other types of substrates is stupid at…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Skeptics emphasize the &amp;#34;vast gulf&amp;#34; between theoretical possibility and technological feasibility, noting that current silicon-based digital computers may have inherent limits that prevent them from truly replicating organic cognition &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48871433&quot; title=&quot;There is a vast gulf between theoretically possible and technologically feasible. If you can’t provide a realistic path to achieve something, you’re asking people to believe in science fiction. You could tell me that a rock’s molecules are comprised of protons, neutrons, and electrons. Blood is also entirely protons, neutrons, and electrons; so theoretically, one could rearrange stone into blood. But without an actual method to do so, it sounds like you’re telling me that you can squeeze blood…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48850433&quot; title=&quot;It seems to me  we’re already at the top of the S curve, not at the toe of an exponential curve. At least with LLMs. Better training data will make small improvements, better architecture will make it less compute intensive, and all these “hyper-scale” data centers will make it cheap and ubiquitous. But none of that is it getting exponentially more intelligent.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, some users report that AI agents are already performing complex, multi-day tasks autonomously &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48871707&quot; title=&quot;Jesus... This morning while I was drinking coffee and staring at the screen (it&amp;#39;s Saturday) an agent did the equivalent of days of my work, reading code, understanding, hypothesizing, comparing, using tools, writing scripts, launching compilers and running tests, identifying problems and proposing solutions, and more. Only someone who hasn&amp;#39;t spent a second reflecting about what it means to think and to be intelligent can claim that we miss a realistic path to intelligence. It&amp;#39;s so damn clueless…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, though critics maintain this is a misunderstanding of how LLMs actually function &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48871850&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; reading code, understanding, hypothesizing, comparing, ...identifying problems and proposing solutions, and more Except it did none of those things, really, because that&amp;#39;s not how it works. This might help, it&amp;#39;s a good writeup: https://www.0xkato.xyz/how-llms-actually-work/ We know how these machines work, it&amp;#39;s not mysterious, there&amp;#39;s nothing &amp;#39;extra&amp;#39; happening.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Amidst these technical debates, others argue that halting progress is historically impossible and that society should focus on regulation rather than &amp;#34;sticking our heads in the sand&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48849070&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m sure some people will have issue with my phrasing but, honest question: Are there examples of where we have collective decided not to pursue knowledge? Successfully? I guess nuclear weapons might be the best example though research doesn&amp;#39;t seem have to actually &amp;#39;stopped&amp;#39; as much as gone underground and we still have country trying to climb that ladder. But I don&amp;#39;t know how relevant that is to LLMs/AI. It almost feels like pandora&amp;#39;s box is open and our only option is continue to improve…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://davidoks.blog/p/why-american-ambulance-rides-are&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why American ambulance rides are so expensive&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (davidoks.blog)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48853091&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;332 points · &lt;strong&gt;495 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by jyunwai&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;American ambulance rides are expensive because providers must recover high fixed costs for 24/7 readiness from a small pool of privately insured patients, as federal law mandates a per-ride billing model rather than a subscription or tax-funded system. &lt;a href=&quot;https://davidoks.blog/p/why-american-ambulance-rides-are&quot; title=&quot;Why American ambulance rides are so expensive    The unfortunately botched economics of emergency care    # [David Oks](/)    SubscribeSign in    # Why American ambulance rides are so expensive    ### The unfortunately botched economics of emergency care    [![David Oks&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The high cost of American ambulance rides is largely attributed to a mismatch between high operational readiness costs and low reimbursement rates from Medicare and insurance companies, which forces providers to shift costs onto private payers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48853566&quot; title=&quot;As much as I like articles that tries to use economics or finance to explain stuff, the &amp;#39;options&amp;#39; analogy is a bit hamfisted. The article starts off by noting about how ambulance is an &amp;#39;option&amp;#39; for a rescue, but even though the analogy might vaguely work, it&amp;#39;s not really needed to answer the question. That can be answered far more simply: &amp;#39;medicare and insurance companies pay them too little, so they have to charge everyone else more&amp;#39;. Or, from the article: &amp;gt;This meant that the payment…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48854106&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The average ambulance transport costs $2,673 to provide I think this ignores the 400 pound gorilla in the room. Why does an ambulance transport cost thousands for the operator? This is a short trip in an automobile, essentially a fancy uber ride. At first one might say that&amp;#39;s flippant - obviously ambulances are specialized vehicles, and you have paramedics, and they need to get to locations quickly, and so forth, but let&amp;#39;s consider those costs. A new, fully equipped ambulance is about $150k.…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the actual per-trip cost should be much lower based on equipment and labor &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48854106&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The average ambulance transport costs $2,673 to provide I think this ignores the 400 pound gorilla in the room. Why does an ambulance transport cost thousands for the operator? This is a short trip in an automobile, essentially a fancy uber ride. At first one might say that&amp;#39;s flippant - obviously ambulances are specialized vehicles, and you have paramedics, and they need to get to locations quickly, and so forth, but let&amp;#39;s consider those costs. A new, fully equipped ambulance is about $150k.…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that the current system forces patients into &amp;#34;financially ruinous&amp;#34; dilemmas during life-threatening emergencies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48856196&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think the question is &amp;#39;Should ambulances be a thing?&amp;#39; though. It&amp;#39;s a question of &amp;#39;Should someone in a situation where they need an ambulance have to balance the potentially life-threatening impact of saying no versus the potentially financially ruinous impact of saying yes?&amp;#39; The (fairly obvious) answer to that no one should be in that situation. It&amp;#39;s horrible. Society should find a better way to pay for ambulances. Most of the world has accepted that some system to spread the cost among…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48856363&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Society should find a better way to pay for ambulances Society has this figured out, at least a decent solution that works until we find a perfect one. Only the US society seems to be unable to find a solution.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters emphasize that this is a uniquely American problem, as most other nations fund EMS through taxes similar to fire and police departments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48853554&quot; title=&quot;We’re all pretending this is an unsolvable problem when really most of the world has solved it by making ambulance (EMS) funding similar to fire and police departments. Somehow in any emergency I’ve seen, all three show up, often EMS before police or fire dept, and somehow that’s a service that has to be supplemented by insurance billings. The blog mentions it, but it’s one of those obvious things that somehow isn’t solved yet and blows my mind every time it comes up.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48856861&quot; title=&quot;And the US also pays a TON of tax dollars to a broken, overregulated system. IIRC if you look at the cost of Medicaide, Medicare, VA, and other federal and state spending it&amp;#39;s the same as most other countries per capita or as a percent of GDP. The US taxpayer pays about as much as Canadians to fund their public system, then pays the same amount again for private cover since it&amp;#39;s not universal. No I&amp;#39;m not making a typo. Medicare, Medicaide, and the US system is such a rip off that per capita…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, while US insurers often exploit &amp;#34;out-of-network&amp;#34; loopholes to deny emergency claims &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48853745&quot; title=&quot;I tell this story every time ambulance costs come up because it might be helpful to anyone. I once lived in San Francisco in the mid-2010s. In SF, the SFFD operates the vast majority of ambulances in the city. As in, 80%+. I once had the need to go to the hospital urgently and called 911. The ambulance that showed up was SFFD. They transported me and I recovered safely. I then got a bill from them saying that my insurance had refused to pay for it - apparently that insurance company (they&amp;#39;re…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.alecscollon.com/blog/llm-burnout/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I think I have LLM burnout&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (alecscollon.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48839984&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;407 points · 362 comments · by sosodev&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer describes experiencing &amp;#34;LLM burnout&amp;#34; due to the repetitive writing styles, frequent hallucinations, and predictable idiosyncrasies encountered while spending hours each day reviewing AI-generated code and text. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.alecscollon.com/blog/llm-burnout/&quot; title=&quot;I Think I Have LLM Burnout    I didn&amp;#39;t expect to get so tired of reading LLM output.    [Skip to main content](#main-content)  [Alec Scollon](/)    * [Home](/)  * [Blog](/blog/)    # I Think I Have LLM Burnout    July 8, 2026    I use LLMs a lot. By current dev standards, my usage rate is probably average,  and my methods are probably primitive. I work on one task at a time and discuss  it with Claude Code (at work) or Codex (at home, for now). Sometimes, I let the  assistant write code, but I read the output…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hacker News users are experiencing burnout from a &amp;#34;bottleneck&amp;#34; effect where LLMs generate code and documentation significantly faster than humans can review or &amp;#34;rubber-stamp&amp;#34; them &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48840162&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think I have a &amp;#39;burnout&amp;#39;, but LLMs are really exhausting due to amount of pressure they generate. No one is really pushing me to increase my workload, but at every moment there is always something ready, done by my clankers or clankers of other people that I could be unblocking. In the past (before LLMs) it was already hard to keep up, but now it feels like there&amp;#39;s 10x more things waiting at any given time, and there could be 10x more if everyone just &amp;#39;optimized&amp;#39; and streamlined…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48840729&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; done by my clankers or clankers of other people I&amp;#39;m getting so many requests to review LLM-generated documents - planning docs, docs intended for end-users, project docs, business plan docs. A team member sent me a zip file with about 30 LLM generated documents in it the other day and asked if I could review them right away. And a lot of it was just repetition and/or stuff that was just out of left field, made-up, hallucinated stuff. They&amp;#39;re able to generate this stuff way faster than we can…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. This shift has transformed software engineering from a creative craft into a repetitive QA role, leading some to consider leaving the industry as the problems they enjoy solving are replaced by &amp;#34;vibe coding&amp;#34; and prompt engineering &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48840077&quot; title=&quot;This is legitimately the reason I&amp;#39;m looking to leave programming. I got into programming because the problems of programming were interesting to me.  But if the problems go from &amp;#39;figure out why this calculator is off by one in France&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;Get this LLM to stop spamming cutsey emojis&amp;#39;, then maybe  it&amp;#39;s time for a career change.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48840169&quot; title=&quot;(And I admit I&amp;#39;m salty that the &amp;#39;I don&amp;#39;t give a shit about why the calculator doesn&amp;#39;t work in France, I&amp;#39;m just here because they pay me to fix it&amp;#39; people were the ones vindicated by technological progress)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48840245&quot; title=&quot;In every industry, and we wonder why everything is being enshittified. I&amp;#39;m not looking forward to using computers or technology over the next decade. There is a non-zero chance myself or a loved one is killed because of vibe coding.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that LLMs are a tool for those who prioritize the end result over the process &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48840564&quot; title=&quot;I got into programming to just build stuff, the coding is just a means to an end, try not to think too hard about the how and think more about the why and what&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others maintain that the &amp;#34;how&amp;#34; of programming is a vital joy that is being eroded by AI-generated &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48840215&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve started feeling slightly physically ill when I read Opus output for hours straight. This article rings very true for me. I&amp;#39;ve started complaining about it with my team; at least have a personal style guide in your agent rules that eliminates emdashes, the &amp;#39;it&amp;#39;s not X, it&amp;#39;s Y&amp;#39;s, the long lists of modifiers before the noun, using the word &amp;#39;land&amp;#39; to mean finish, etc. I hope this is just a phase of adolescent LLMs.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48840665&quot; title=&quot;We get it, you don&amp;#39;t have a passion for the act or the craft, just the end result, but I&amp;#39;m absolutely sick of hearing it all over this site as if it&amp;#39;s a universal truth that some of us just don&amp;#39;t recognize yet. Sorry, some of us have a joy for programming where the how is just as important, if not more so, than the what and the why. No matter how much people proclaim that the how doesn&amp;#39;t matter to them , it isn&amp;#39;t going to suddenly make it true for others.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. To mitigate these issues, some suggest using LLMs primarily for boilerplate or leveraging them to create exhaustive, automated testing suites to validate the high volume of output &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48840080&quot; title=&quot;I do not have the burnout but I certainly operate similarly to the author. I continue to be unable to establish a workflow where allowing the LLM to generate code that I review is faster than writing the code myself. Literally the only two ways out of this dilemma is to blindly trust what was generated or to generate an uncharacteristically exhaustive suite of unit tests to validate every possible scenario. I just write the business logic myself and have the LLM do a lot of the rest.…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48840116&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; generate an uncharacteristically exhaustive suite of unit tests to validate every possible scenario. This is what you want. You want comprehensive tests at every level, far more than is reasonable for a human to build or maintain, from unit, functional, to full end to end and beyond. Adversarial testing (both TDD-style &amp;#39;write tests to demonstrate this bug&amp;#39;, and posthoc &amp;#39;prove this patch wrong with a new test&amp;#39;) is the best way to keep AI on track and make those diffs you have to read clean and…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hy.tencent.com/research/hy3&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hy3&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (hy.tencent.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48847552&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;559 points · 120 comments · by andai&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tencent has officially released Hy3, an open-source AI model that outperforms its predecessor in reasoning, coding, and long-context tasks while significantly reducing hallucination rates and token consumption for improved cost-efficiency. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hy.tencent.com/research/hy3&quot; title=&quot;Title: Tencent Hy    URL Source: https://hy.tencent.com/research/hy3    Published Time: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 06:15:38 GMT    Markdown Content:  July 6, 2026    ![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hy3 is gaining attention for its impressive world knowledge and creative writing capabilities, with some users finding it more capable than DeepSeek-V4 Flash despite its relatively small size &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48850524&quot; title=&quot;Writes pretty engaging prose, finetunes well, now MIT licensed... what&amp;#39;s not to like? Oh and very good world knowledge for the size: better than than DS4 Flash&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48848190&quot; title=&quot;This model is shockingly small for how capable it is. its a little bit bigger than deepseekV4 flash but around as capable if not more on some benchmarks than V4 pro, i wouldnt be surprised if this becomes a popular local model.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While it recently topped OpenRouter rankings, its competitive edge is debated due to shifting price economics and the availability of high-quality alternatives like Qwen &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48848715&quot; title=&quot;A month ago I wrote a blog post about how Hy3 was topping the OpenRouter rankings despite no one talking about it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317294 As of today, it has fallen to 8/9th on the rankings. I don&amp;#39;t see a reason where you would use this model over competitors. However, price economics are bit confusing, as currently the effective input price of Hy3 via OpenRouter is now the same as DeepSeek-hosted DeepSeek Flash V4. https://openrouter.ai/tencent/hy3-preview…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48848477&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s a 2-bit quant of DS4 flash. You&amp;#39;re probably better off running Qwen3.6-27B at Q8.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant portion of the discussion focuses on the difficulty of training models for creative prose, noting that balancing coherence with creativity requires high parameter counts that smaller models often struggle to manage &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48851653&quot; title=&quot;Do people really use 100B+ models for writing? I am no writer but to me it seems like writing is one of the easiest tasks with barely any logic or reasoning and as long as its not longer than a handful of pages I expect even 8B models to perform great.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48852832&quot; title=&quot;The largest model I&amp;#39;ve post-trained in the last 2 years of working on this problem was Kimi 2.5 at 1T parameters. The simplest way I&amp;#39;d put it is, teaching a model to write coherently (follow rules, patterns, etc.) is easy enough: just use teacher forcing. Teaching a model to write creatively is easy enough: just use RL and punish it for not being creative. Teaching a model to write well and creatively takes learning two partially opposing objectives that spike the learning requirements in ways…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alexalejandre.com/programming/interview-with-mitchell-hashimoto/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interview with Mitchell Hashimoto about Ghostty and Zig&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (alexalejandre.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48849292&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;395 points · 250 comments · by veqq&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a wide-ranging interview, Mitchell Hashimoto discusses building the Ghostty terminal with Zig, his philosophy on open-source maintainer obligations, and the importance of holistic software design over simply &amp;#34;checking boxes&amp;#34; or following industry trends. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alexalejandre.com/programming/interview-with-mitchell-hashimoto/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Interview With Mitchell Hashimoto    URL Source: https://alexalejandre.com/programming/interview-with-mitchell-hashimoto/    Published Time: 2026-07-09T01:28:19-06:00    Markdown Content:  Interview With Mitchell Hashimoto Jul 2026 - Alex Alejandre    * * *    [Mitchell Hashimoto](https://mitchellh.com/) was behind [Vagrant](https://vagrantup.com/), [Packer](https://packer.io/), [Consul](https://consul.io/), [Terraform](https://terraform.io/), [Vault](https://vaultproject.io/),…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a recurring cycle of &amp;#34;culture wars&amp;#34; in programming, where enthusiasts of newer languages like Zig and Rust are accused of aggressive evangelism against established ones like C++ or C &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48853248&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I don’t like the Rust culture. There’s no better way to put it. This is just so weird to me, because I would say the same about Zig. I tried to get into Zig even chatted with Loris Cro when he was streaming.  I was looking to explore what my Rust project could look like in Zig but there were features simply missing that I couldn&amp;#39;t do without.  The entire interaction was mostly about how bad Rust is and how I could just do something different in Zig (completely misunderstanding my ask, with…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48854737&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I remember watching HN and seeing every time there was something Rust related trending, there was ALWAYS a post made shortly after trying to hype Zig and this went on for like 4 years. You just got a tiny taste of what Rust enthusiasts have been doing to every C++ related submission here on HN for years.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48853275&quot; title=&quot;Culture wars are sadly one of the biggest inhibitors of progress throughout all of technology.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48855280&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; You just got a tiny taste of what Rust enthusiasts have been doing to every C++ related submission Which is what C++ enthusiasts have done to C enthusiasts and C enthusiasts have done to assembly enthusiasts.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find the Rust community&amp;#39;s persistence particularly toxic, others argue this friction is a natural result of differing technical tastes and the historical tendency of developers to chide predecessors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48853499&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This is just so weird to me, because I would say the same about Zig. Then why is it weird if you&amp;#39;re saying the same thing? Different programming languages appeal to programmers with different tastes, and so it makes sense that some programmers would be drawn to language X and dislike language Y, while others would be the opposite.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48854821&quot; title=&quot;Seriously. Yesterday there was a thread about a use-after-free bug in OpenBSD and despite BSD predating Rust by decades there were still people chiding the project for not using Rust (as though Rust would even protect you from all memory errors in a kernel project where you&amp;#39;d inevitably need to write unsafe Rust anyways!). Rust might be a fine language but it has the most toxic evangelist culture, bar none.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48853588&quot; title=&quot;Maybe it&amp;#39;s even the other way around: different cultures and tastes give birth to different languages and community norms around them.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Amidst the cultural debate, there is specific disagreement regarding Mitchell Hashimoto&amp;#39;s praise for PowerShell-style structured data, with some insisting that CLI tools should prioritize plain text for compatibility with traditional Unix utilities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48853868&quot; title=&quot;This is the only statement I disagree with: &amp;gt; PowerShell gets a lot right with structured data. CLI programs should operate on text. If you want to parse and format it, do so, but the default output mode should be plain text, so that I can pipe it into grep or awk without a second thought. I am continuously irritated that the AWS CLI defaults to outputting in JSON. No one (I hope…) is using that tool in programs; that’s what boto3 and its ilk are for. But if humans are reading it, why default…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.howtogeek.com/why-developers-are-ditching-github-for-codeberg-and-self-hosting-alternatives/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why developers are ditching GitHub for Codeberg and self-hosting alternatives&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (howtogeek.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48842611&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;366 points · 257 comments · by Gedxx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Developers are increasingly migrating from GitHub to alternatives like Codeberg and self-hosted platforms due to frequent service outages, concerns over aggressive AI integration, and disagreements with the platform&amp;#39;s political and licensing directions under Microsoft&amp;#39;s ownership. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.howtogeek.com/why-developers-are-ditching-github-for-codeberg-and-self-hosting-alternatives/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Why developers are ditching GitHub for Codeberg and self-hosting alternatives    URL Source: https://www.howtogeek.com/why-developers-are-ditching-github-for-codeberg-and-self-hosting-alternatives/    Published Time: 2026-07-08T20:00:17Z    Markdown Content:  Menu     [![Image 2: How-To Geek logo](https://static0.howtogeekimages.com/assets/images/htg-logo-full-colored-light.svg?v=3.6)](https://www.howtogeek.com/)    Sign in now    - [x]     Close     *   [News](https://www.howtogeek.com/news/)  *       * …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users argue the &amp;#34;trend&amp;#34; of leaving GitHub is exaggerated and lacks statistical proof &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48843102&quot; title=&quot;Sentiment for/against GitHub aside... &amp;#39;Why X are doing Y&amp;#39; articles like these pretend that the premise of &amp;#39;X are doing Y&amp;#39; is true, conveniently skipping to the &amp;#39;Why&amp;#39; before proving that the premise is even accurate in any meaningful way. This is why I never buy headlines that start out with &amp;#39;Why&amp;#39;. &amp;gt; developers are ditching Proceeds to list but a handful of remotely meaningful repos against the hundreds of thousands on there&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that declining service quality and resentment over AI training on open-source code are driving a genuine shift &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48843678&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Proceeds to list but a handful of remotely meaningful repos against the hundreds of thousands on there The trend is what&amp;#39;s interesting here. Github has never been threatened by anyone, because their service was too good to bother for everyone but the most ideologically motivated. Now their service has become so bad there&amp;#39;s a github joke at work every time something is down or slower than it should. Reputation is a very valuable thing, and Github has destroyed a stellar one in a few month,…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48843309&quot; title=&quot;Mostly because developers (me included) don&amp;#39;t like to be told we are being laid off due to AI that was trained on our free open-source hobby projects.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents of alternatives highlight the ease of self-hosting tools like Gitea or GitLab &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48843173&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s been 9 months since I ditched Github. Currently I self-host Gitea [0], use its registry for Docker, NPM etc and act runners [1] for github actions alternative, everything secured under tailnet. I&amp;#39;m extremely satisfied with that setup. It is batteries included &amp;amp; fire and forget. Now I use Github only as backup by mirroring my self hosted repos. [0] https://gitea.com [1] https://docs.gitea.com/usage/actions/act-runner&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48843596&quot; title=&quot;You&amp;#39;d be surprised how easy it is to self-host GitLab with Docker Compose, GitLab has an official &amp;#39;Omnibus&amp;#39; Docker image. No need to handicap yourself with Gitea/Forgejo/whatever, you can just use an industry-standard platform without much effort. Hardware requirements are nowhere close to high either.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, though critics note that platforms like Codeberg can introduce friction through aggressive anti-bot measures and non-neutral governance policies, such as proposed bans on AI-generated code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845166&quot; title=&quot;I tried codeberg, used it a year, then early this year in all their wisdom codeberg decided to show adverserial random text instead of my repo, reporteldly to mess up llm training to user agents they weren&amp;#39;t sure were human. Codeberg had one job, serve my repo, it didn&amp;#39;t do that, when brought up, I was told it was a feature not a bug, they could maybe whitelist me but that wasn&amp;#39;t my problem, it was that random people got totally blocked or from accessing the repo. I moved back to github.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845360&quot; title=&quot;Is your complaint about Anubis? I see the &amp;#39;checking if you are human&amp;#39; kind of text too when going to codeberg, but it is usually only a second or two. It is because I run a bit of obfuscation and resistance to browser finger printing. But you find seeing the text for a couple of seconds too annoying to use codeberg? Maybe it is more than 2 seconds for you? Everyone has their views on what is acceptable in the world and what they will put up with. Just, to my point of view, I think codeberg is…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48843783&quot; title=&quot;FYI that Codeberg is currently holding a vote to broadly ban projects written mostly using AI, so its not a neutral space for hosting your projects like GitHub: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/pulls/1253 https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/116880003584050912&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, the debate centers on whether the ideological benefits of independence outweigh the convenience and reliability of GitHub&amp;#39;s established ecosystem &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845166&quot; title=&quot;I tried codeberg, used it a year, then early this year in all their wisdom codeberg decided to show adverserial random text instead of my repo, reporteldly to mess up llm training to user agents they weren&amp;#39;t sure were human. Codeberg had one job, serve my repo, it didn&amp;#39;t do that, when brought up, I was told it was a feature not a bug, they could maybe whitelist me but that wasn&amp;#39;t my problem, it was that random people got totally blocked or from accessing the repo. I moved back to github.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48843184&quot; title=&quot;You use github as a backup, why bother self-hosting then?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48846122&quot; title=&quot;codeberg&amp;#39;s one job gets interfered with by freeloaders hammering expensive views (like git blame) inconsiderately.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ai.meta.com/blog/introducing-muse-spark-meta-model-api/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Muse Spark 1.1&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ai.meta.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48846184&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;408 points · 214 comments · by ot&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meta has introduced Muse Spark 1.1, an agentic AI model available via API that marks the company&amp;#39;s transition into charging for its artificial intelligence services. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ai.meta.com/blog/introducing-muse-spark-meta-model-api/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;ai.meta.com&amp;amp;#x2F;static-resource&amp;amp;#x2F;muse-spark-1-1-evaluation-report&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;ai.meta.com&amp;amp;#x2F;static-resource&amp;amp;#x2F;muse-spark-1-1-evaluatio...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt; [pdf]&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;developer.meta.com&amp;amp;#x2F;ai&amp;amp;#x2F;resources&amp;amp;#x2F;blog&amp;amp;#x2F;build-with-muse-spark&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;developer.meta.com&amp;amp;#x2F;ai&amp;amp;#x2F;resources&amp;amp;#x2F;blog&amp;amp;#x2F;build-with-muse...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of Muse Spark 1.1 is seen as a win for consumers due to increased competition and aggressive pricing, with some suggesting Meta should continue &amp;#34;spoiling&amp;#34; the market by commoditizing frontier models through open weights &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48846467&quot; title=&quot;I personally do not like Meta, but I&amp;#39;ll say this. The more competition, the better for regular consumers. (Enterprise too) - Chinese models - Grok - Meta - Google - OpenAI - Anthropic I think this is a win. I&amp;#39;m building like crazy to take advantage of all these subsidized tokens while I can.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48846464&quot; title=&quot;The pricing is insane: $1.25/$4.5 for 1M tokens, and $0.15 for cached input! https://dev.meta.ai/docs/getting-started/pricing-rate-limits&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48848147&quot; title=&quot;Maybe Zuck should double down on his &amp;#39;spoiler&amp;#39; role with models rather than compete head-to-head. He doesn&amp;#39;t have to match Anthropic or OpenAI model revenue if he can deflate theirs by 99%. All he has to do is keep spending a few billion dollars developing frontier models, release them as open weights, and turn coding models into a commodity. He also needs a good OSS reference harness to match. Very few people are in a position to do this and for it to make business sense. That&amp;#39;s quite likely…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. However, the model&amp;#39;s performance claims are under fire, with critics alleging &amp;#34;shady benchmarking&amp;#34; that violates official constraints to inflate scores &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48847019&quot; title=&quot;Lot more details in the linked report https://ai.meta.com/static-resource/muse-spark-1-1-evaluatio... From Terminal-bench-2.1 details, &amp;gt; We use a bash-tool-only agent harness to evaluate 89 Terminal-Bench 2.1 tasks from the official repository, where resources are capped at 6 CPU cores and 8GB RAM. This disqualifies the results. Each terminal bench task has a cpu upper limit and RAM upper limit. Overriding either is disqualification. For reference, in tbench-2.1, 1. 0 out of 89 task allow 6 cpu…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also centers on the future of the profession, debating whether AI will increase demand for engineers to fix novice mistakes or eventually replace them by outperforming humans at contextualizing and framing complex problems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48846716&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, I think it is definitely great. Having said that, I am still debating in my mind whether the volume of software engineers needed in the AI era is going to increase or decrease because of all of these advancements. On the one hand, because it is easy to build products, more and more people will build. And more and more products and features will be built. However, a lot of people who are non-technical will also try to build, but they get stuck, and then they will need engineers. The sheer…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48846803&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; On the one hand, because it is easy to build products, more and more people will build. And those people won&amp;#39;t need to be software engineers. &amp;gt; but they get stuck, and then they will need engineers You&amp;#39;ve implicitly assumed here that the AI systems will always be worse than the average engineer. That is IMO myopic. I&amp;#39;m not sure that it&amp;#39;s even true now let alone in the nebulous future.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48847453&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; but they can&amp;#39;t read minds I don&amp;#39;t know who needs to hear this, but neither can humans. You&amp;#39;ve implicitly assumed here that AI systems will always be worse at contextualizing and framing questions than the average engineer. I&amp;#39;m not sure that it&amp;#39;s even true now let alone in the nebulous future. You haven&amp;#39;t narrowed the fundamental myopia of the assumption here, just dressed it in slightly different clothing.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://scotto.me/blog/2026-07-09-why-lisp/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A road to Lisp: Why Lisp&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (scotto.me)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845209&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;297 points · 309 comments · by silcoon&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lisp is a powerful, &amp;#34;programmable&amp;#34; language that uses homoiconicity and macros to allow developers to extend the language itself. Its live, REPL-driven environment enables interactive development and the creation of highly extensible software by treating code as manipulable data. &lt;a href=&quot;https://scotto.me/blog/2026-07-09-why-lisp/&quot; title=&quot;Title: A road to Lisp: Why Lisp    URL Source: https://scotto.me/blog/2026-07-09-why-lisp/    Published Time: 2026-07-09T00:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  The question that most programmers face when seeing some Lisp code for the first time is, without doubt, “what the hell is this?”. I asked myself the same thing when I first read its unconventional syntax: all those parentheses, the weird indentation, and who thought to use the first argument of `format` to print to stdout?    `(defun…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on Lisp’s unique position between &amp;#34;Dark Side&amp;#34; power (unconstrained flexibility) and &amp;#34;Light Side&amp;#34; purity, with some arguing its simplicity allows for the creation of highly restrictive, bug-preventing DSLs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48849015&quot; title=&quot;Programming is in tension between the Light Side and the Dark Side. The Light Side is about preventing the programmer from making mistakes: Get rid of go-tos! Add static types! Do not allow a bug to be expressible. The Dark Side is about giving power to the programmer: Macros? Obviously. Operator overloading? Self-modifying code? Multi-line reg-exps? Go to town! The Light Side knows programmers are flawed and imposes constraints. The Dark Side trusts programmers with power. Neither side is…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48853541&quot; title=&quot;Typical ignorant take. Lisp macros allow you to create restricted DSLs to prevent bugs from being expressible, including full static type and structured programming systems.  Basically no one understands this until they reach the &amp;#39;lisp enlightenment&amp;#39;, so the decades of beating this drum falls on deaf ears. AI is here now so it&amp;#39;s time to let it all go.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. A major point of contention is the Lisp REPL; while critics argue that interactive shells are now standard in most languages, proponents claim Lisp offers a qualitatively different, holistic experience where the editor and live application state are deeply integrated &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48848239&quot; title=&quot;There are some truly powerful and unique things about Lisps, but I wish articles like this would stop including REPLs and hot-reloading. The former have been table stakes for interpreted languages (and some compiled ones!) for years, and the latter is neither unique nor particularly widely used (hot reloads have to tangle with state and patching, so resetting the world for ease of reasoning is considered a best practice for a reason).&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48848734&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The former have been table stakes for interpreted languages I used to think so too back in the day when I was getting into Clojure. It was much later when I realized that when Lisp people talk about the REPL they’re usually talking not so much about the interactive CLI where you can evaluate commands easily but more so the ability to connect your program to a live session where you can quickly evaluate forms within your text editor and in the context of your running application, which enables…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48850333&quot; title=&quot;No. There is real, palpable, practical, functional difference between working a Lisp REPL and a REPL in a non-homoiconic languages - Ruby, Python, Haskell, etc. Every single stage there in Read-Eval-Print-Loop differs. Man, it gets so exhausting trying to convince every PL critic who grabs a single (or a couple) of axis of any language and tries to dispute the value of a language without ever understanding the holistic, overall experience working with it. Like, I don&amp;#39;t understand, do people…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users express fatigue with the &amp;#34;mysticism&amp;#34; surrounding Lisp, calling for more level-headed critiques rather than the typical &amp;#34;enlightenment&amp;#34; narratives favored by veteran developers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48850010&quot; title=&quot;There are many articles extolling the virtues of Lisp. I would like to see some articles that have a level-headed criticisms or critique of Lisp, it&amp;#39;s ideas and it&amp;#39;s place in the ecosystem of languages. Articles like this, and the PG articles it references, amount to &amp;#39;if you know, you know&amp;#39;. I understand the appeal and I understand the explicit and implicit arguments this article is making. Computer programming has matured quite a bit in the past 60 years. I would like to see more articles that…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48856805&quot; title=&quot;Why do you think other people who have fallen in love with, say, Ruby, are less experienced in other languages? They just have less of a cult.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/07/us-seeks-cheaper-hunter-killer-drones-after-iran-destroys-1b-worth-of-reapers/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;US seeks cheaper hunter-killer drones after Iran destroys $1B worth of Reapers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (arstechnica.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845514&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;251 points · &lt;strong&gt;312 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by rbanffy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Pentagon is seeking lower-cost hunter-killer drones after losing nearly 30 MQ-9A Reapers, valued at $1 billion, to Iranian air defenses. The military aims to acquire more &amp;#34;cost-effective&amp;#34; aircraft by 2031 that can overwhelm enemy defenses despite high expected combat losses. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/07/us-seeks-cheaper-hunter-killer-drones-after-iran-destroys-1b-worth-of-reapers/&quot; title=&quot;US seeks cheaper hunter-killer drones after Iran destroys $1B worth of Reapers    US military drone losses in Iran war spur Pentagon call for cheap replacements.    [Skip to content](#main)  [Ars Technica home](https://arstechnica.com/)    Sections    [Forum](/civis/)[Subscribe](/subscribe/)[Search](/search/)    * [AI](https://arstechnica.com/ai/)  * [Biz &amp;amp; IT](https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/)  * [Cars](https://arstechnica.com/cars/)  * [Culture](https://arstechnica.com/culture/)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The US military&amp;#39;s reliance on expensive &amp;#34;wonderweapons&amp;#34; like the $30 million Reaper drone is being criticized as an inefficient strategy that struggles against adversaries using cheaper, decentralized tactics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48846375&quot; title=&quot;I’m no military expert by any means but US appears to be obsessed with destroying some super important target to win, like they did with killing Iran leaders only to find out that new leader replace the perished. The same with the other stuff, they have super important radar and super important ships that need to be defended and a failure creates irreplaceable loses.    Iran on the other hand, just like with their super important leaders lost all its “super weapons” like destroyers and the drone…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845862&quot; title=&quot;The defense industry has spent the last 40+ years grooming the DoD into thinking it costs $30mil/unit to produce missiles and drones. They should have rejected any of the bids, but being fueled by massively excessive taxes in the USA, they don&amp;#39;t have to answer to any sort of efficiency or profitability. These things should cost less than a Toyota Camry.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Insiders attribute these high costs to extreme &amp;#34;red tape&amp;#34; and rigid testing requirements that prioritize process over rapid iteration, contrasting sharply with Ukraine’s ability to produce effective tech at a fraction of the price by ignoring traditional regulations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845818&quot; title=&quot;I worked on the control systems for Predators and Reapers back in the mid and late 00s, and the inefficiencies around process were enormous.  Safety is extremely important, so you expect some slowness as a result, but it got pretty extreme.  I remember one time having to do 6 weeks of testing around a one-line code change because a &amp;#39;helpful&amp;#39; dev fixed a small bug that had no practical impact.  Yet because it changed the release build hash, we had to go through a full acceptance test.  As you…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48848019&quot; title=&quot;In Ukraine, the first place that was bombed was the red tape factory. The drone industry was allowed to basically &amp;#39;do whatever as long as it works&amp;#39;, consequences be damned. So they use civilian motors, batteries and SoCs, sketchy firmware with zero code inspection, and more. Does it work perfectly? No. It works well enough. I wonder if anyone is going to learn a lesson about overregulation. I&amp;#39;m not sure if &amp;#39;AI for red tape mitigation&amp;#39; is a thing, but &amp;#39;AI for killer drones&amp;#39; sure is. I suspect…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48846465&quot; title=&quot;This is why Ukraine is making equivalent tech now for 1/10th the price. It&amp;#39;s great to see.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters argue these funds would be better spent on domestic social programs or national debt, expressing concern that the military-industrial complex has groomed the government into accepting massive waste &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48846322&quot; title=&quot;There are ~350,000,000 of us. When I read we spent $1B, I think about how I&amp;#39;m responsible for $3 of that. It doesn&amp;#39;t matter considering the ~$117,550 of the national debt I&amp;#39;m responsible for. It palls compared to the $3,000 a year in interest towards the national debt I&amp;#39;m responsible for. What boggles my mind is that I make coffee at home because I&amp;#39;m frugal. I guess it is good the government and DoD are seeking cheaper alternatives also. My favorite interview question: If I gave you a swarm of…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845862&quot; title=&quot;The defense industry has spent the last 40+ years grooming the DoD into thinking it costs $30mil/unit to produce missiles and drones. They should have rejected any of the bids, but being fueled by massively excessive taxes in the USA, they don&amp;#39;t have to answer to any sort of efficiency or profitability. These things should cost less than a Toyota Camry.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48847698&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; When I read we spent $1B, I think about how I&amp;#39;m responsible for $3 of that. I like to think about how providing 4-week paid parental leave would cost $2 billion annually and actually help US families. Meanwhile we have spent over $100 billion on this war.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://datacenter.iers.org/data/latestVersion/bulletinC.txt&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;No leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2026&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (datacenter.iers.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48846281&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;308 points · 244 comments · by ChrisArchitect&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://datacenter.iers.org/data/latestVersion/bulletinC.txt&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The unpredictability of Earth&amp;#39;s rotation, which necessitates leap seconds, is driven by complex factors including geological activity, weather patterns, and human-induced changes like aquifer draining and glacial melt &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48847282&quot; title=&quot;What causes the unpredictability in this? I would have guessed we have earth&amp;#39;s rotation and orbit down to many decimals. Does geological activity, weather, or something else cause rotation speed differences that we just can&amp;#39;t predict?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48847517&quot; title=&quot;In short, yes, the weather, geology, and signicantly, human movement of water via aquifer draining and dam building, as well as glaicial and ice melts, all contribute to unpredictable changes in the earths rotational period, as well as the axis of rotation. The models for this are IIRC trigonometric polynomials of fairly low order, so even if we could model the unpredictability perfectly, truncation error would limit our ability to distribute the model at super high accuracy. The existing…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While leap seconds are slated for phase-out by 2035, the transition is complicated by legal hurdles and technical requirements for systems like GLONASS; one proposed &amp;#34;legal fiction&amp;#34; involves replacing them with &amp;#34;leap hours&amp;#34; that would not occur for centuries &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48847517&quot; title=&quot;In short, yes, the weather, geology, and signicantly, human movement of water via aquifer draining and dam building, as well as glaicial and ice melts, all contribute to unpredictable changes in the earths rotational period, as well as the axis of rotation. The models for this are IIRC trigonometric polynomials of fairly low order, so even if we could model the unpredictability perfectly, truncation error would limit our ability to distribute the model at super high accuracy. The existing…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48847862&quot; title=&quot;2035 is the agreed drop dead date. Everybody agreed that &amp;#39;Leap seconds&amp;#39; are a sufficiently bad idea that they should be replaced by 2035. Nobody has agreed how to fix it, and &amp;#39;Just turn them off&amp;#39; isn&amp;#39;t technically legal. However, &amp;#39;What if there were Leap hours instead?&amp;#39; is technically legal and of course those hours would happen in the very distant future (likely after our civilisation is gone) so it&amp;#39;s functionally identical to &amp;#39;Just turn them off&amp;#39; but without legal problems. Now, I&amp;#39;m English,…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a consensus that leap seconds are poorly handled by modern software, as UNIX timestamps ignore them entirely, leading to potential synchronization errors or unrepresentable moments in time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48850334&quot; title=&quot;ELI5: How does this impact UNIX timestamps? Particularly for things that are in maintenance mode or otherwise minimally maintained. Nothing I do requires this level of precision, but certainly there are things that do.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48850392&quot; title=&quot;UNIX timestamps are fully ignorant of leap seconds, i.e. pretends they don&amp;#39;t exist. That means there can be physical seconds of time that cannot be referenced with a UNIX timestamp (when a leap second is inserted) as well as UNIX timestamps for seconds that don&amp;#39;t exist (when a leap second is deleted).&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users suggest that time adjustments should be handled at the time zone abstraction layer rather than the core clock, while others humorously propose using equatorial jet engines to physically regulate the planet&amp;#39;s rotation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openai.com/index/chatgpt-for-your-most-ambitious-work/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ChatGPT Work&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (openai.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48849059&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;351 points · 190 comments · by Tiberium&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI has launched ChatGPT Work, a new agent powered by GPT-5.6 that automates complex professional tasks across apps, creates materials like slides and docs, and handles scheduled workflows. It is rolling out now for Pro, Enterprise, and Edu users, with desktop features available to all plans. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openai.com/index/chatgpt-for-your-most-ambitious-work/&quot; title=&quot;Title: ChatGPT is now a partner for your most ambitious work    URL Source: https://openai.com/index/chatgpt-for-your-most-ambitious-work/    Markdown Content:  Introducing ChatGPT Work, an agent in ChatGPT that helps you take on more ambitious tasks. It can gather information across your apps and workflows to create finished materials like sheets, slides, docs, and web apps, and stay with complex projects for hours by breaking them into smaller steps and completing them independently.    With Codex…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI’s rebranding and unification of Codex into &amp;#34;ChatGPT Work&amp;#34; has caused significant confusion and frustration among users who feel the core chat experience has been &amp;#34;torched&amp;#34; in favor of a coding-centric interface &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48849778&quot; title=&quot;I just installed this. I am very confused. I no longer have a Codex app on my computer. ChatGPT is now Codex. But what happened to ChatGPT? Where am I supposed to casually chat? Also, when you toggle btween ChatGPT Work and ChatGPT Codex, nothing changes. This is super confusing. Can someone from the OpenAI team clarify the difference btwn the modes? Does chatgpt work have more business-y related plugins turned on by default? Edit: So it seems like the only place you can actually chat with…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48849661&quot; title=&quot;I wonder why they haven’t simply continued to rebrand Codex as a general-purpose tool. ChatGPT Work is a convoluted name and continues the trend of having separate brands for separate things, what runs counter to OpenAI’s purported goal of unifying every workflow into a single “superapp”. Worse still: what happens when your workflow involves both coding and general knowledge work? Are you expected to switch apps, or switch settings? To me, it sounds very confusing and inefficient, and not at…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48850398&quot; title=&quot;Same. I don&amp;#39;t see why they thought this was a good move.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The update replaces the native macOS app with a version that relegates standard conversations to a &amp;#34;homeless&amp;#34; nested window or a &amp;#34;Classic&amp;#34; app that users suspect is slated for abandonment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48849778&quot; title=&quot;I just installed this. I am very confused. I no longer have a Codex app on my computer. ChatGPT is now Codex. But what happened to ChatGPT? Where am I supposed to casually chat? Also, when you toggle btween ChatGPT Work and ChatGPT Codex, nothing changes. This is super confusing. Can someone from the OpenAI team clarify the difference btwn the modes? Does chatgpt work have more business-y related plugins turned on by default? Edit: So it seems like the only place you can actually chat with…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48852052&quot; title=&quot;So let me get this straight: 1) If you have the Codex desktop app installed, and you update from within the app, it replaces itself with the new chat-demoted-to-an-overlay app called &amp;#39;ChatGPT&amp;#39; and renames your existing ChatGPT app to &amp;#39;ChatGPT Classic.&amp;#39; 2) If you get the new ChatGPT app and replace your current app with it, you don&amp;#39;t get a &amp;#39;Classic&amp;#39; app and there&amp;#39;s no way to download it. 3) They really named an app &amp;#39;Classic.&amp;#39; Naming your app Classic is putting a bright red sign on it that says…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48850888&quot; title=&quot;This unification is garbage. Chats that are about topics other than programming projects are relegated to a tiny, unsearchable popup window. Renaming the old app &amp;#39;ChatGPT Classic&amp;#39; implies that it will be discontinued at some point. This is a serious regression. What existed before worked fine. I would expect the mode switcher to include a Chat mode, which would recreate the old, chat-focused UI, for asking about random topics. So, that&amp;#39;s basically gone now. Technically, it&amp;#39;s hidden and severely…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see the move as a necessary step toward agentic &amp;#34;superapps&amp;#34; that can access local files and perform complex research tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48850263&quot; title=&quot;I have a longer version of this, but in summary So my understanding of the differences between chat, code and co-work; but may well be wrong! Chat is the human, talking directly to the LLM - old school. Very basic can create docs etc - but saves in a temp folder.  No real access to your local PC. Cowork / work - Human talking to an agent, which can then use tools to do work.  Also runs in a container, allowing it access to your drives/computer. Claude Code / Codex - No longer in a container,…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48849382&quot; title=&quot;So, Claude Cowork for OpenAI? Feels overdue! I&amp;#39;ve loved using Cowork recently for sourcing decisions. Things where seemingly everyone&amp;#39;s out of stock or questionably reputable, just let Cowork spin for 20 minutes, find the best new and best used options that meet your requirements, probably also suggesting a different item that does the job and is available for cheap. I&amp;#39;ve done it enough that I&amp;#39;m starting to loathe clicking through these sites myself.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others criticize the transition as a &amp;#34;serious regression&amp;#34; that breaks essential features and complicates workflows &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48850856&quot; title=&quot;I have updated Codex and it&amp;#39;s now ChatGPT. And the chat in Codex is badly broken and doesn&amp;#39;t support the one feature I use in almost every chat. Good job.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48850888&quot; title=&quot;This unification is garbage. Chats that are about topics other than programming projects are relegated to a tiny, unsearchable popup window. Renaming the old app &amp;#39;ChatGPT Classic&amp;#39; implies that it will be discontinued at some point. This is a serious regression. What existed before worked fine. I would expect the mode switcher to include a Chat mode, which would recreate the old, chat-focused UI, for asking about random topics. So, that&amp;#39;s basically gone now. Technically, it&amp;#39;s hidden and severely…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cg5pd9z2487o&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bonnie Tyler has died&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48843438&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;339 points · 124 comments · by theanonymousone&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Welsh singer Bonnie Tyler, the gravel-voiced star famous for the 1980s hit &amp;#34;Total Eclipse of the Heart,&amp;#34; has died at age 75 following complications from emergency intestinal surgery. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cg5pd9z2487o&quot; title=&quot;Title: Bonnie Tyler: The gravel-voiced singer who eclipsed people&amp;#39;s hearts    URL Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cg5pd9z2487o    Published Time: 2026-07-09T09:05:12.060Z    Markdown Content:  ## Bonnie Tyler, the gravel-voiced star who eclipsed everyone&amp;#39;s heart    19 hours ago    James McCarthy BBC Wales    ![Image 1: Getty Images Bonnie Tyler on stage singing. She wears a black long sleeve dress and holds the microphone in one hand, with the other outstretched. Her long blonde hair is loose.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The death of Bonnie Tyler sparked a debate over Hacker News&amp;#39; content standards, with some users arguing that celebrity death notices are off-topic &amp;#34;normie&amp;#34; content &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48844612&quot; title=&quot;How is this hacker news worthy?  Never heard of her or the song. Is from a time when people carried boomboxes on their shoulders?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845003&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s not how it works. If upvotes alone mattered, HN would quickly degenerate into Reddit. The bar is whether &amp;#39;good hackers&amp;#39; would find this interesting. Death notices of famous artists are the definition of off-topic: &amp;#39;most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, or celebrities, unless they&amp;#39;re evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. If they&amp;#39;d cover it on TV news, it&amp;#39;s probably off-topic.&amp;#39; If normies care about it, good hackers by definition probably don&amp;#39;t. I flag this and every…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, while others maintained that the community&amp;#39;s upvotes validate its relevance to an older demographic of &amp;#34;good hackers&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48844849&quot; title=&quot;Death notices of famous artists are regularly on HN. If people upvote it, it should be worthy.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48844696&quot; title=&quot;Before that.  Her breakthrough album was 1977 and Total Eclipse of the Heart came out in 1982, so it was more the 8-track era.  It remained a staple of radio plays (remember those?) through the 80s and 90s though, and was remade by Nikki French into a chart-topping dance version in 1995. A lot of HN is folks in their late 30s, 40s, and early 50s (and sometimes even older!), so many folks here would&amp;#39;ve overlapped with the radio era.  A lot of folks here were involved in making…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845003&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s not how it works. If upvotes alone mattered, HN would quickly degenerate into Reddit. The bar is whether &amp;#39;good hackers&amp;#39; would find this interesting. Death notices of famous artists are the definition of off-topic: &amp;#39;most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, or celebrities, unless they&amp;#39;re evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. If they&amp;#39;d cover it on TV news, it&amp;#39;s probably off-topic.&amp;#39; If normies care about it, good hackers by definition probably don&amp;#39;t. I flag this and every…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters fondly recalled her &amp;#34;powerhouse&amp;#34; hits like &amp;#34;Total Eclipse of the Heart&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;Holding Out For a Hero,&amp;#34; sharing related cultural artifacts such as a literal music video parody and a song-structure flowchart &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48844220&quot; title=&quot;Literal music video of Total Eclipse, one of the funniest things I’ve ever seen https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsgWUq0fdKk RIP Ms Tyler, you will be missed&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48844427&quot; title=&quot;And let us not forget &amp;#39;Holding Out For a Hero&amp;#39; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWcASV2sey0&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845165&quot; title=&quot;Growing up in the 80s, I&amp;#39;ve known (and sung) this song all my life. But I just saw this flowchart for the first time today: https://jeannr.tumblr.com/post/165291081/i-made-a-flow-chart... I believe that&amp;#39;s the original source, but it looks cut off. Here&amp;#39;s a full version: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/b1/82/dc/b182dcc291495c013c98...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48844781&quot; title=&quot;Featured towards the climax of Short Circuit 2, which was huge in my childhood. What a powerhouse piece of music!&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The thread also devolved into a technical nostalgia trip regarding the era&amp;#39;s audio formats, debating the overlap between 8-tracks, vinyl, and the rise of the Walkman &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48844696&quot; title=&quot;Before that.  Her breakthrough album was 1977 and Total Eclipse of the Heart came out in 1982, so it was more the 8-track era.  It remained a staple of radio plays (remember those?) through the 80s and 90s though, and was remade by Nikki French into a chart-topping dance version in 1995. A lot of HN is folks in their late 30s, 40s, and early 50s (and sometimes even older!), so many folks here would&amp;#39;ve overlapped with the radio era.  A lot of folks here were involved in making…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48844786&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m old enough to remember Walkmans coming out in 1979, which was the start of the end of the boombox era.  Approximately no-one was using 8-track at that point.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48844805&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not quite that old, but didn&amp;#39;t people look down on cassettes due to their lower audio quality? Weren&amp;#39;t most home systems (hi-fis) still vinyl or 8-track for a while longer?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://connectsci.au/news/news-parent/9703/Spider-venom-kills-varroa-mites-without-harming&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Spider venom kills varroa mites without harming honeybees&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (connectsci.au)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48841259&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;306 points · 140 comments · by Jedd&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Researchers have discovered that a specific toxin derived from spider venom can effectively kill parasitic varroa mites without causing harm to honeybees. &lt;a href=&quot;https://connectsci.au/news/news-parent/9703/Spider-venom-kills-varroa-mites-without-harming&quot; title=&quot;Title: Just a moment...    URL Source: https://connectsci.au/news/news-parent/9703/Spider-venom-kills-varroa-mites-without-harming    Warning: This page maybe requiring CAPTCHA, please make sure you are authorized to access this page.    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: Icon for connectsci.au](https://connectsci.au/favicon.ico)    ## connectsci.au    ## Performing security verification    This website uses a security service to protect against malicious bots. This page is displayed while the website verifies…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discovery of a spider venom treatment for varroa mites is seen as a potential breakthrough for an industry where mite management currently accounts for 80% of beekeeping labor &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48841416&quot; title=&quot;The hard truth these days is that the work of bee keeping is like 80% keeping the mites in check. Plus all current treatments render the honey inedible so you can only do it at the end of the season.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48841376&quot; title=&quot;Some potentially seriously good news there if it all pans out the way it sounds like it might.  Fingers crossed for the bees!&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some emphasize that mites are the primary threat requiring human intervention for honeybee survival, others argue that the focus on mites ignores the broader damage caused by rampant pesticide use and monoculture farming &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48842082&quot; title=&quot;I suppose honey bees are not native in North America pretty much the same way as the human species? I don’t quite understand why there seems to be a pretty persistent thread around “honey bees are invasive and harm the ecosystem by stealing all the food from the native bees and doing all their pollination; that’s why they decline” - when at the same time the use of pesticides is so rampant that insects are literally gone entirely. Honey bees are not great and reliable pollinators btw. So the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48841469&quot; title=&quot;This assumes the mites are what kills the bees. What is that asssumption is flawed?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. This has sparked a debate over whether North America should continue supporting non-native honeybees or pivot toward cultivating climate-adapted native pollinators &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48841910&quot; title=&quot;Honeybees are not native to North America. It is great and currently necessary we use them the way we do. It makes one wonder in the age of AI and evolving farm practices, can we start finding ways to cultivate already-climate-adapted native bees to do the work? Can we leverage adaptations for specific crops? I get it that honeybees work great at pollinating monoculture fields, etc., but that does not change the fact we are perpetuating a square peg in round hole problem and pushing it very…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48842057&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;Honeybees are not native to North America. Neither are horses. I guess the issue is you don&amp;#39;t get honey with the native bees.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Proposed alternatives to current practices include using mycelium for immune boosts, adopting mesh hive floors to physically trap mites, or transitioning to vertical farming to reduce the environmental footprint of agriculture &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845284&quot; title=&quot;I grew up on a farm on which the apiary and all connected with it was a major part of the farm&amp;#39;s output.  Honey, beeswax, nukes (a queen and 10K or so worker bees as a starter colony, sold to other apiaries in the spring if they&amp;#39;d had too many winter losses), fertilizing services (drop a couple colonies off at a berry farm after dark, pick the colonies up two weeks later, profit!) and other products. It&amp;#39;s been over ten years since I spent any serious time with bees, but the bees themselves did…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48842426&quot; title=&quot;An idea that sprang to mind and please point me out at which points its unrealistic and why because I am talking completely out of my ass here. If we want to reduce mono culture but we still need to somehow figure out how to provide humanity. Could large scale vertical farms, in Green Houses reduce the footprint of monocultures? By being more productive year round? Or is that just technolgist delusions of mine?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48842464&quot; title=&quot;Check out Paul Stamets&amp;#39; research using Mycelium to give honeybees an immuneboost. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-32194-8&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48842548&quot; title=&quot;The thing that always baffles me with vertical farming is sunlight. Assuming most crops are pretty good at turning full spectrum sunlight into useful stuff, why shrink your solar energy per crop? And assuming you get around this via grow lights, surely the energy and material cost goes up too much for high-volume crops to make economical sense.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-07-08</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-07-08</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://x.ai/news/grok-4-5&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Grok 4.5&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (x.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835111&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;774 points · &lt;strong&gt;1486 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by BoumTAC&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;xAI has announced Grok-4.5, a new large language model featuring a 100,000-token context window and improved performance in coding, reasoning, and creative writing. &lt;a href=&quot;https://x.ai/news/grok-4-5&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;cursor.com&amp;amp;#x2F;blog&amp;amp;#x2F;grok-4-5&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;cursor.com&amp;amp;#x2F;blog&amp;amp;#x2F;grok-4-5&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of Grok 4.5 has sparked a debate over whether the model&amp;#39;s political &amp;#34;nudging&amp;#34; makes it unreliable for business use &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48838151&quot; title=&quot;I just don&amp;#39;t think that I can ever trust an xAI model knowing that they are actively trying to shape its replies to fit a political narrative. How can you trust their models to be reliable in a business setting with the foreknowledge that their models are being nudged around in the backend?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, or if its right-leaning adjustments simply serve to counter the established left-wing biases found in competing LLMs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48838293&quot; title=&quot;Studies on political bias in models consistently show that LLMs lean politically left. The only outlier is grok which leans right but by a smaller factor, according to this study for instance: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23841 Edit: adding some other studies that are easily retrievable with a quick search for those unsatisfied with the first one - https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12922 https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.16746 Claiming reality has a left wing bias is certainly an opinion you&amp;#39;re welcome to have…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48838298&quot; title=&quot;My immediate thought as well. Every other AI platform has very left leaning guardrails installed. Grok is the only AI platform that has been shown to be center leaning.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48839194&quot; title=&quot;Has it occurred to you that _all_ model providers are actively trying to shape their models&amp;#39; replies to fit their preferred political narratives?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users question the economic viability of spending billions to remain in third place &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48836079&quot; title=&quot;Can someone breakdown to me how this makes any sort of economical sense? Spending billions and billions to have the 3rd best model while even the number 1 and 2 players already seem to struggle making a profit. What am I missing here? Not trying to go full Ed Zitron but this doesn’t make sense to me.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others point to its superior reasoning efficiency and competitive pricing as evidence of a strong market position &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835179&quot; title=&quot;It seems to be extremely economical - 4x better reasoning efficiency compared to Opus while being priced at $2/$6. For comparison, GPT 5.4 is $2.5/$15, GPT 5.5/5.6 are $5/$30, Opus 4.8 is $5/$25, Fable is $10/$50. And by benchmarks (unless they gamed them), seems to be at around Opus 4.7 level, which is what Elon mentioned in https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2074911038286295049 . I guess the Cursor data was very useful.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics also raise ethical concerns regarding the company&amp;#39;s content moderation policies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48838348&quot; title=&quot;I am amazed at people&amp;#39;s willingness to use Grok. The company is so transparently morally bankrupt. They&amp;#39;re the only AI company that seems okay with CSAM (or at least don&amp;#39;t do as much to stop it) Why give them money? It would be one thing if they were the only game in town but thats definitely not the case.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, while pragmatists argue that political bias is irrelevant when using the tool for technical tasks like coding &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48838190&quot; title=&quot;By not using them on something political? Why do I care when I&amp;#39;ll just use it to generate code?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tris.sherliker.net/blog/obfuscated-self-evaluating-bash-script-by-cdn-akamai-being-supplied-to-consumers-via-retail-stores/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Decoding the obfuscated bash script on a Uniqlo t-shirt&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tris.sherliker.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48829312&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1485 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 232 comments · by speerer&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Uniqlo t-shirt designed by Akamai features an obfuscated Bash script that, when decoded from Base64, runs a terminal animation of the message &amp;#34;PEACE FOR ALL.&amp;#34; The design uses Roboto Mono font and celebrates Linux as the &amp;#34;open-source language of the internet.&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://tris.sherliker.net/blog/obfuscated-self-evaluating-bash-script-by-cdn-akamai-being-supplied-to-consumers-via-retail-stores/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Obfuscated, self-evaluating bash script by CDN Akamai being supplied to consumers via retail stores    URL Source: https://tris.sherliker.net/blog/obfuscated-self-evaluating-bash-script-by-cdn-akamai-being-supplied-to-consumers-via-retail-stores/    Markdown Content:  When my wife said to me “Let me show you a t-shirt I saw…”, I wasn’t sure what to expect, but it definitely wasn’t an obfuscated bash script printed on the back designed to print a happy Easter egg message.    I’m not in the habit…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Uniqlo t-shirt script sparked a debate over its origin, with some users attributing the excessive commenting to an LLM &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48829568&quot; title=&quot;OCRing this is a nightmare and is a good benchmark to any self-proclaimed good OCR/vision model. I think though it could likely be easily OCR&amp;#39;d if you give the image to any decent agentic harness with a good vision model, e.g. newest Claude/GPT ones, and tell them to split the image per lines, and then just OCR each line individually. I wonder if the script itself was written by an LLM before obfuscation? There seem to be a lot of comments in it, but in this case it&amp;#39;s still ok :)&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48829824&quot; title=&quot;Definitely LLM. No humans write that many comments.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, while others argued the specific Japanese text and color gradient logic suggested human intent &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48830073&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think it was written by an LLM, some things stand out: The congratulations text is both in English and Japanese. Contains a single heart emoji. There was an intention to have a cyan to orange gradient, but the range starts in an ANSI block, ends halfway through the 256 color block and 256 terminal colors are not  arranged like a gradient at all. There&amp;#39;s no sleep at the end of the loop where I feel like an LLM would add that defensively.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical analysis revealed that the shirt&amp;#39;s typesetting is not truly monospaced due to &amp;#34;optical kerning,&amp;#34; making OCR difficult &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48831703&quot; title=&quot;The font is Roboto Mono, not Consolas. There&amp;#39;s something else a lot stranger going on, though. It is a proper monospace font, but the typesetting on the shirt is not. There&amp;#39;s some kerning going on (I noticed it especially in the &amp;#39;Iy&amp;#39; pair), and also it appears that narrower characters such as &amp;#39;i&amp;#39; take less horizontal space. If I had to guess, I would say that it was set with a tool such as &amp;#39;optical kerning&amp;#39; in InDesign.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48832264&quot; title=&quot;Has anyone ever made a monospace font with dynamic kerning? Which is a silly thing I never thought of until I read the above comment. This sounds nonsensical at first glance(and it may be) but hear me out. We use monospace fonts for a reason, they stack in a grid nicely. But within the confines of that grid there is room to shift a character left or right a bit which may lead to a nicer to read monospace. (it is equally likely to lead to a hideous mess, every time a letter would shift left it…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, a challenge the designer reportedly intended &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48830198&quot; title=&quot;I love this shirt! Here&amp;#39;s a nice video from the actual designer about the process of making this shirt (including intentionally making it hard to OCR): https://youtu.be/jocGLiecpjU?t=526&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters also noted practical flaws in the code, such as a missing `bc` dependency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48830022&quot; title=&quot;P  ./cool.sh: line 31: bc: command not found  ./cool.sh: line 34: bc: command not found  ./cool.sh: line 37: bc: command not found  E  ./cool.sh: line 31: bc: command not found  ./cool.sh: line 34: bc: command not found  ./cool.sh: line 37: bc: command not found Very wow. Shame they assumed everyone has &amp;#39;bc&amp;#39;...&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt; and a syntax error in a related design that joked about the social stigma of &amp;#34;unsafe bash scripting&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48830771&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Uniqlo x Akamai sells another design of shirt in the same range which is plainly incomplete&amp;#39; Imagine having to return a t-shirt because that malfunction! — I don&amp;#39;t understand why are you returning this, was the size wrong or you didn&amp;#39;t like it? — No, there is a syntax error at line 37 that makes it impossible to run, and I&amp;#39;m concerned people on the street may think I promote unsafe bash scripting.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://apnews.com/article/john-deere-right-to-repair-agriculture-equipment-cb7514ffedb95c130a976af661f2bc02&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;John Deere owners will get the right to repair equipment under FTC settlement&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (apnews.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48838876&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1390 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 302 comments · by djoldman&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Federal Trade Commission has secured a settlement with John Deere, ensuring that equipment owners have the right to repair their own machinery. &lt;a href=&quot;https://apnews.com/article/john-deere-right-to-repair-agriculture-equipment-cb7514ffedb95c130a976af661f2bc02&quot; title=&quot;Title: FTC secures right to repair settlement with farming equipment giant John Deere | AP News    URL Source: https://apnews.com/article/john-deere-right-to-repair-agriculture-equipment-cb7514ffedb95c130a976af661f2bc02    Published Time: 2026-07-08T22:24:33Z    Markdown Content:  [Enable accessibility](https://apnews.com/article/john-deere-right-to-repair-agriculture-equipment-cb7514ffedb95c130a976af661f2bc02#)    **0**    ##### Login or register to continue    Submit    Or use    By continuing, you agree to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While there is broad public support for farmers&amp;#39; ability to repair their own equipment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48839210&quot; title=&quot;Bananas that stuff like this needs to get litigated in our society - if you asked 100 random people &amp;#39;should farmers be able to repair their equipment&amp;#39;, you would get 100 yes&amp;#39;s.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, the settlement&amp;#39;s $1 million fine is criticized as a negligible &amp;#34;cost of doing business&amp;#34; compared to John Deere&amp;#39;s multi-billion dollar profits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48839183&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Deere must pay $1 million collectively to the five states for antitrust enforcement costs and will be subject to strict compliance oversight for the next 10 years. $1 million fine for probably $10 billion in profit. I know what lesson I&amp;#39;d learn if my only personal value was maximizing shareholder value. The compliance part can be dealt with later.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48839345&quot; title=&quot;Not OP but I went through some data and John Deere makes 5B NET profit for the worse years. 10B for their best (only looking back 10 years). I wouldn’t be surprised these anticompetitive (as in anti “consumer”) has netted them north of 10B.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Some argue that lockdown practices were partially driven by strict interpretations of emissions laws, as open access makes it trivial for owners to bypass environmental controls &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48839239&quot; title=&quot;Until you tell them how easy it makes it to bypass emissions restrictions.  My tractor was shipped with a screw turned down to &amp;lt;25hp to bypass emissions controls.  I could turn that screw back up and have a ~35hp tractor, but of course, that would be illegal and make lots of environmentalists cry. Opening up John Deere tractors for right to repair virtually assures they will ~all be doing emissions deletes.  Part of their lock-down was profit seeking, but the other half is that different…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48839287&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand, are 35hp tractors illegal under emissions rules? Then why even manufacture them and cripple them?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights the advocacy of Louis Rossmann in the right-to-repair movement, though users debate whether his long-form communication style is necessary to convey the complexity of digital rights &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48839300&quot; title=&quot;Shout out to Louis Rossmann for doing a ton of work on Right to repair. He started a website called Consumer Rights Wiki to document anti-consumer practices. https://consumerrights.wiki/w/Main_Page He&amp;#39;s also involved with FULU Foundation which has a bounty of 25k to get Ring cameras working without Amazon&amp;#39;s servers. https://bounties.fulu.org/bounties/ring-video-doorbells&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48840031&quot; title=&quot;I appreciate everything he stands for - he&amp;#39;s on the right side of just about every issue. I just wish he could make more succinct and effective videos.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48840380&quot; title=&quot;Personally I think if he did that people wouldn&amp;#39;t pay attention. My experience is that when you complain to people about digital rights they just glaze over unless you walk them through all the ins and outs and the implications.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.hmans.dev/blog/chatto-is-open-source&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chatto is now open source&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (hmans.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48833116&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1097 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 301 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chatto has officially transitioned to an open-source, self-hosted group chat application featuring encrypted data, voice and video calls, and a lightweight frontend. The developer also announced the upcoming public beta of Chatto Cloud, a paid hosting service with no data lock-in or premium subscriptions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.hmans.dev/blog/chatto-is-open-source&quot; title=&quot;Title: Chatto is now Open Source!    URL Source: https://www.hmans.dev/blog/chatto-is-open-source    Markdown Content:  Hot damn. This is the big one.    **I’m happy to announce that Chatto, the group and team chat application that I’ve been working on for the past year or so, is now officially Open Source, and available for anyone to self-host.**    The fastest way to give it a try is through Homebrew:    ```  brew install chattocorp/tap/chatto  chatto init  chatto run  ```    See Chatto’s [Getting Started…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of Chatto sparked a debate over &amp;#34;agentic coding,&amp;#34; with some praising the developer&amp;#39;s ability to build the project single-handedly using AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48833633&quot; title=&quot;I’ve known Hendrik for years, and he is one of the most talented developers I’ve ever met. I’m confident this project will become successful very quickly. Beyond the project itself, what fascinates me most is how he single-handedly developed it by leveraging agentic coding.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, while others expressed skepticism or &amp;#34;shame&amp;#34; regarding the quality of AI-assisted code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835522&quot; title=&quot;Alright, I was vaguely interested for a little, but you convinced me to avoid it.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48836111&quot; title=&quot;Well that’s just snarky and not very nice. The guy has 30 years experience as a dev according to a sibling comment so it’s not as though it’s some vibe coded junk. Why do you believe a good dev can’t use AI to assist in writing great code?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48834470&quot; title=&quot;Are you sure you read that here? I came back yesterday after a hiatus and I’ve been dismayed how many posts are just “yeah, I just run Claude all day” without a hint of embarrassment or shame.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also focused on the project&amp;#39;s dual-licensing strategy, which uses AGPL for the backend to prevent cloud providers from hosting it without contributing back, while keeping the frontend permissive for customizability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48833976&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s the rationale for the dual licensing? It looks like the Go backend is AGPL but the TypeScript frontend is Apache 2.0. Why not keep it all AGPL?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48834284&quot; title=&quot;Backend under AGPL prevents someone hosting it as a service. AGPL specifies that hosting _is_ distribution. Therefore, anyone hosting it must do so with public code. This provides a soft form of exclusivity to run their own Cloud. A frontend, permitting customizability, white-labeling, and so on, makes more sense to be more permissive. Grafana is a solid example to illustrate why. Moved from Apache to AGPLv3 in 2021 specifically so cloud providers couldn&amp;#39;t host modified versions without…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835958&quot; title=&quot;Prohibiting a user of your software from modifying it and using it to run their business goes against both freedoms 0 and 1. This “users are obligated ‘give back’ the moment they make money with the gift they were given” is nonsense and anyone paying attention knows it.  A business making money using free software doesn’t take anything away from the releasing organization. The anti-commerce bent of a subset of the free software zealots hate business so much that they tried to smuggle a EULA…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite praise for its ease of self-hosting and &amp;#34;boring&amp;#34; reliability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48833714&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It’s designed to be extremely easy to self-host on your own infrastructure. Kudos for this. Per the docs: https://docs.chatto.run/ , &amp;gt; Chatto ships in a compact, self-contained binary &amp;gt; it uses NATS, a compact message broker that also ships with a built-in stream persistence engine [...] NATS is just as easy to provision as Chatto, and most of our examples will show you how. &amp;gt; you can also configure an external S3-compatible object storage for Chatto to store your files in, and we strongly…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48834308&quot; title=&quot;Couldn&amp;#39;t help but smile because &amp;#39;chato&amp;#39; in portuguese means &amp;#39;boring&amp;#39;, and this seems very easy to set up and use. Here&amp;#39;s to more boring software! :)&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, commenters noted that any Slack competitor faces a massive uphill battle against established network effects and the lack of a universal open protocol &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835363&quot; title=&quot;The fundamental problem with replacing Slack is network effects. Your coworkers and customers already use Slack. It works well enough. You can choose to switch your company away, maybe, but what do you do when vendors want to connect over Slack? Imagine if email was owned by a company? Edit: W̶e̶ ̶r̶e̶a̶l̶l̶y̶ ̶n̶e̶e̶d̶ ̶a̶n̶ ̶o̶p̶e̶n̶ ̶p̶r̶o̶t̶o̶c̶o̶l̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶b̶u̶i̶l̶d̶ ̶o̶n̶.̶ We really need an open protocol to win here.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bun.com/blog/bun-in-rust&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rewriting Bun in Rust&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bun.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48837877&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;784 points · 529 comments · by afturner&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bun has been rewritten from Zig to Rust in just 11 days using Anthropic’s Claude LLM to systematically port over 500,000 lines of code. The transition to Rust aims to eliminate persistent memory stability issues while delivering a 20% smaller binary and a 2% to 5% performance boost. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bun.com/blog/bun-in-rust&quot; title=&quot;Title: Rewriting Bun in Rust    URL Source: https://bun.com/blog/bun-in-rust    Published Time: 2026-07-08T16:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  Disclosure: Bun was acquired by Anthropic in December 2025. I and others on the Bun team work at Anthropic. I used a pre-release version of Claude Fable 5 for much of the Rust rewrite.    Bun started as a line-for-line port of esbuild&amp;#39;s JavaScript &amp;amp; TypeScript transpiler from Go to Zig. I wrote my first line of Zig on [April 16,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The decision to rewrite Bun in Rust has sparked debate over whether the project&amp;#39;s improved performance and reduced binary size are inherent to Rust&amp;#39;s abstractions or simply the result of a high-cost, focused refactoring effort &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48838232&quot; title=&quot;Without commenting on Bun itself as a project, or the nature of the rewrite, it can&amp;#39;t be good for Zig that a naive rewrite away from it fixed memory leaks, improved stability, shrunk binary size by 20%, and improved performance by 5%.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48838740&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Combined with the Rust rewrite, ICU changes, and identical code folding, Bun&amp;#39;s binary size shrinks by ~20% on Linux &amp;amp; Windows. People who are surprised by this probably has not seen what Zig code actually looks like. Zig&amp;#39;s explicitness and lack of abstraction have a real cost that it is basically one of the most verbose programming languages I&amp;#39;ve ever seen, it&amp;#39;s somehow even more verbose than Go. Basic features of modern languages like pattern matching and generics, and as you can see, having…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48839185&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think it&amp;#39;s care to categorize this as &amp;#39;a naive rewrite away from [Zig]&amp;#39; - Jarred has been immersed in this project for five years, got to benefit from everything he learned along the way and spent $165,000 of tokens on the most advanced coding LLM anyone has access to. I expect if he&amp;#39;d spent $165,000 running Fable against the Zig version he could have got a 5% performance improvement, too.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that Zig’s verbosity and manual memory management lead to leaks and instability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48838232&quot; title=&quot;Without commenting on Bun itself as a project, or the nature of the rewrite, it can&amp;#39;t be good for Zig that a naive rewrite away from it fixed memory leaks, improved stability, shrunk binary size by 20%, and improved performance by 5%.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48838740&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Combined with the Rust rewrite, ICU changes, and identical code folding, Bun&amp;#39;s binary size shrinks by ~20% on Linux &amp;amp; Windows. People who are surprised by this probably has not seen what Zig code actually looks like. Zig&amp;#39;s explicitness and lack of abstraction have a real cost that it is basically one of the most verbose programming languages I&amp;#39;ve ever seen, it&amp;#39;s somehow even more verbose than Go. Basic features of modern languages like pattern matching and generics, and as you can see, having…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that Zig offers superior transparency and that the AI-driven rewrite may have sacrificed long-term maintainability for &amp;#34;vibe coding&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48838582&quot; title=&quot;Yeah but they turned it into something unreadable. Call it a skill issue if you wish. I just haven’t found another language that just makes sense. Zig doesn’t hide anything from you&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48838927&quot; title=&quot;People say a lot of things, especially when they have a vested interest in a positive outcome. Bun has been fully vibe coded into another language. There’s no way in hell it’s maintainable. Go read any analysis of the Claude Code leak for proof.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. The use of Claude Code to complete a year&amp;#39;s worth of work in 11 days is seen as a technological feat, though critics note the $165,000 token cost makes it an inaccessible strategy for most teams &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48839234&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This Rust rewrite would&amp;#39;ve taken a team of engineers with full-context on the codebase a year of work. With 1 engineer using Fable &amp;amp; closely monitoring Claude Code, we went from start to 100% of the test suite passing on all platforms in 11 days. This is impressive from a technological standpoint, but it does gloss over the fact that it would have cost $165k in tokens were Bun not part of Anthropic. The comparison here isn’t completely fair - it would take a small team a year to port it if…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48839185&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think it&amp;#39;s care to categorize this as &amp;#39;a naive rewrite away from [Zig]&amp;#39; - Jarred has been immersed in this project for five years, got to benefit from everything he learned along the way and spent $165,000 of tokens on the most advanced coding LLM anyone has access to. I expect if he&amp;#39;d spent $165,000 running Fable against the Zig version he could have got a 5% performance improvement, too.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-live/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GPT‑Live&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (openai.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48834405&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;748 points · 526 comments · by logickkk1&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI has launched GPT-Live, a new full-duplex voice model for ChatGPT that enables natural, real-time conversations with the ability to listen and speak simultaneously. The model delegates complex tasks to GPT-5.5 in the background and is currently rolling out to global users on mobile and web. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-live/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Introducing GPT-Live    URL Source: https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-live/    Markdown Content:  We’re launching GPT‑Live, a new generation of voice models that make talking with AI feel much more like having a real conversation.    GPT‑Live is built on a full-duplex architecture, meaning it can listen and speak at the same time. During conversations, GPT‑Live can show it’s paying attention with phrases like “mhmm” or “yeah”, engage in quick back-and-forth, or just stay quiet when you…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of GPT-Live-1 has sparked a debate between users who value its &amp;#34;full-duplex&amp;#34; architecture for hands-free brainstorming and those who view it as a threat to human connection &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48834625&quot; title=&quot;I had preview access to this one for a few weeks. It&amp;#39;s very good. I had one conversation that lasted a full hour while I was walking the dog, got some good brainstorming done against one of my projects. The best feature is that it can delegate questions out to GPT-5.5 in the background, so you&amp;#39;re no longer restricted to a voice model that&amp;#39;s several years behind the frontier. I did report a fun bug with it though: it was interrupting me and laughing at my (not really intended as) jokes while I…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48834670&quot; title=&quot;(Atty from OpenAI here) GPT-Live-1 is the first version of a new generation of models, and we believe the full-duplex architecture + delegation enables entirely new ways of human-AI interaction. Would love to hear your feedback!&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that delegating creative and social tasks to AI &amp;#34;sucks away&amp;#34; human-ness and exacerbates the loneliness epidemic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48834902&quot; title=&quot;This is the opposite direction AI should be going. Human relationships are the most valuable thing we have, and so, naturally, technology seeks to intermediate and now replace them. I&amp;#39;m not Catholic, but this podcast presents a very interesting argument against talking to AI as if they were human: https://newpolity.com/podcasts-hub/debate-chatbots&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835013&quot; title=&quot;Most of what AI does is already in wrong direction. Not just human-to-human interaction, it took away thinking, creative work, sensory perception (glasses) and responses. People call it as helping humans, but I call it as sucking away the &amp;#39;human-ness&amp;#39; from humans. After the damage is done, the mega corps would simply shrug and will say &amp;#39;Well, we were just responding to our business competition&amp;#39; The business knows no human-ness, because it is not a human. Businesses and machines are creatures…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835134&quot; title=&quot;Hey! Bit of an unusual question maybe: if this stuff further exarcerbates the loneliness epidemic and atomization of society, will you be able to live with yourself you think? If you hear about teenagers only spending time with your chatbot in 5 years, will you feel some amount of personal responsibility or not? Always curious to hear you guys&amp;#39; perspective on that kind of stuff!&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, while proponents question how the existence of AI tools prevents anyone from continuing to perform those tasks themselves &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835223&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand this line of reasoning. How are you hindered from doing any of those things? What part of &amp;#39;AI can now do X&amp;#39; makes it so you can&amp;#39;t also do X?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical feedback highlights a desire for better tool integration during voice sessions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48834659&quot; title=&quot;What I’m missing from this announcement is the capability to use connectors and tools. I don’t really get it - NONE of the frontier assistants can use tools / connectors while in voice mode - Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok. It seems so obvious: I want to be able to research stuff, pull up documents, jot down notes and do productive work while I’m talking to it, and not end voice mode whenever I need to connect to an app or service. It’s weird. The old Claude voice mode WAS able to use tools but…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt; and a preference for utility over &amp;#34;creepy&amp;#34; or overly emotive personality settings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48834625&quot; title=&quot;I had preview access to this one for a few weeks. It&amp;#39;s very good. I had one conversation that lasted a full hour while I was walking the dog, got some good brainstorming done against one of my projects. The best feature is that it can delegate questions out to GPT-5.5 in the background, so you&amp;#39;re no longer restricted to a voice model that&amp;#39;s several years behind the frontier. I did report a fun bug with it though: it was interrupting me and laughing at my (not really intended as) jokes while I…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48834689&quot; title=&quot;Is it responsive to personality settings? I actively don&amp;#39;t want fake AI girlfriend, but I do get a ton of value out of voice mode. Looking forward to trying this but hoping it&amp;#39;s not a creepy overdone mess (like Sesame). Expectations are they&amp;#39;ll keep doubling down on fake AI girlfriend approach because the thing I want probably wouldn&amp;#39;t drive engagement anywhere nearly as well&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://devblogs.microsoft.com/typescript/announcing-typescript-7-0/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;TypeScript 7&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (devblogs.microsoft.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48833715&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;716 points · 301 comments · by DanRosenwasser&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft has announced TypeScript 7.0, a native port built in Go that delivers build speeds up to 12x faster than previous versions. The release introduces native code speed, shared memory multithreading, and a rebuilt file-watcher, while maintaining compatibility with TypeScript 6.0 through a new side-by-side installation package. &lt;a href=&quot;https://devblogs.microsoft.com/typescript/announcing-typescript-7-0/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Announcing TypeScript 7.0    URL Source: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/typescript/announcing-typescript-7-0/    Published Time: 2026-07-08T15:58:29+00:00    Markdown Content:  Today we are proud to announce the availability of TypeScript 7, a 10x faster native port of TypeScript!    Since its early days, TypeScript has promised to deliver on JavaScript that scales. By bringing strong type-checking and rich tooling to the world of JavaScript, TypeScript made it possible to build non-trivial…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of TypeScript 7 has sparked praise for its massive performance improvements, with some codebases seeing speedups of nearly 12x &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48836176&quot; title=&quot;The speed up numbers based on their testing: Codebase    | TypeScript 6 | TypeScript 7 | Speedup      ------------|--------------|--------------|--------      vscode      | 125.7s       | 10.6s        | 11.9x      sentry      | 139.8s       | 15.7s        | 8.9x      bluesky     | 24.3s        | 2.8s         | 8.7x      playwright  | 12.8s        | 1.47s        | 8.7x      tldraw      | 11.2s        | 1.46s        | 7.7x Congratulations to the team for pulling off this feat while doing a responsible…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While users celebrate TypeScript&amp;#39;s role in popularizing types &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835036&quot; title=&quot;Remember when people would argue about how types weren&amp;#39;t worth the effort? I love TypeScript, if nothing else for how it&amp;#39;s been able to popularize types.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, the discussion highlights a long-standing debate over whether past resistance was directed at types themselves or the &amp;#34;gymnastics&amp;#34; and poor tooling associated with early static typing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835497&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t recall anyone disliking types . Lots of people disliked static typing , or more directly static, explicit typing . For instance, I&amp;#39;ve been around many conversations over the years where people would say goofy things like they couldn&amp;#39;t use Python because it&amp;#39;s untyped. That&amp;#39;s insane: Python is strongly typed. It&amp;#39;s also dynamically typed, which is a different dimension. There are some genuinely untyped languages, or more typically &amp;#39;stringly typed&amp;#39; ones. I hacked around on AREXX as a youth,…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835520&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; TypeScript just gets in the way of that for me. Not just because it requires an explicit compile step, but because it pollutes the code with type gymnastics that add ever so little joy to my development experience, and quite frequently considerable grief. Things that should be easy become hard, and things that are hard become `any`. No thanks! That comment is expected by a Ruby enthusiast, which is arguably one of the most dynamic languages in existence.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835381&quot; title=&quot;Look at some of the typing present in MS COM back in the IE5/6 days and we can discuss more.  I can honestly tell you - I&amp;#39;ll take untyped languages any day of the week over that clusterfuck. Personally - I also think people really underestimate just how much the tooling around types has improved over the last 20 years. If I&amp;#39;m having to try to look up the difference between iBrowserInterface6 and iBrowserInterface5 and iBrowserInterface4... (and yes - shit like this really did exist:…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that dynamic languages like Python are often unfairly labeled as &amp;#34;untyped&amp;#34; due to differing definitions of type theory &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835497&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t recall anyone disliking types . Lots of people disliked static typing , or more directly static, explicit typing . For instance, I&amp;#39;ve been around many conversations over the years where people would say goofy things like they couldn&amp;#39;t use Python because it&amp;#39;s untyped. That&amp;#39;s insane: Python is strongly typed. It&amp;#39;s also dynamically typed, which is a different dimension. There are some genuinely untyped languages, or more typically &amp;#39;stringly typed&amp;#39; ones. I hacked around on AREXX as a youth,…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48836557&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s a school of thought that consider the term &amp;#39;types&amp;#39; reflect to the properties that exist in programs even before they are run, as in they are a property of the programs themselves, not their state at runtime. This thinking—which is also what type theory talks about—does consider Python untyped: reading a Python program along with its specification, you are not able to assign types to each expression. But what Python does have is tagging: when you create an object you tag it, and then…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, while proponents suggest that modern tooling has finally made the benefits of types outweigh the friction of a compile step &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835036&quot; title=&quot;Remember when people would argue about how types weren&amp;#39;t worth the effort? I love TypeScript, if nothing else for how it&amp;#39;s been able to popularize types.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835131&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think ... serious people... argued that. That&amp;#39;s a bit hyperbolic so I&amp;#39;m sure I&amp;#39;m wrong, but I have an ace: if you point me at very smart people who argued against types I&amp;#39;m gonna say that they weren&amp;#39;t serious. I think it&amp;#39;s not possible, if you have the relevant experience of working on both typed and untyped codebases of at least moderate complexity with at least one collaborator, to come away seriously believing that the untyped way is superior (unless you were forced to use a really…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835381&quot; title=&quot;Look at some of the typing present in MS COM back in the IE5/6 days and we can discuss more.  I can honestly tell you - I&amp;#39;ll take untyped languages any day of the week over that clusterfuck. Personally - I also think people really underestimate just how much the tooling around types has improved over the last 20 years. If I&amp;#39;m having to try to look up the difference between iBrowserInterface6 and iBrowserInterface5 and iBrowserInterface4... (and yes - shit like this really did exist:…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cloudflare.com/drop/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cloudflare Drop&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cloudflare.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48836233&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;524 points · 285 comments · by coloneltcb&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudflare Drop is a web tool that allows users to instantly deploy and host websites by dragging and dropping folders or zip files containing HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cloudflare.com/drop/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Cloudflare Drop    URL Source: https://www.cloudflare.com/drop/    Warning: This is a cached snapshot of the original page, consider retry with caching opt-out.    Markdown Content:  [Skip to main content](https://www.cloudflare.com/drop/#main)    Drop files    Matt    ![Image 1: Cloudflare](blob:http://localhost/4dfef6a7f19f3e971511deff48739a11)    # Drop a folder. Or a zip.    Summon your site - HTML, CSS, JS. See it live instantly.    Browse folders Browse zips    © 2026 Cloudflare, Inc.    *   [Terms of…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the utility and security implications of Cloudflare Drop, with some users praising its ability to simplify sharing static demos &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48837419&quot; title=&quot;Wow the people in this thread are a huge bummer. This is much cooler and I doubt this is a real safety issue. You can already sign up for a free cloudflare account and deploy it for free, on your own, on a free workers.dev domain. The friction removal here isn&amp;#39;t going to meaningfully change the security / amount of malicious content.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48837102&quot; title=&quot;A minute ago I had an HTML doc I wanted to share with a PM. It was a Claude prepared demo of a hypothetical feature. Lots of screenshots. I ended up just embedding them directly in the HTML as base64 and sending him a 15mb file, but hypothetically this would have been a nice solution instead.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt; while others criticize it as a derivative concept previously popularized by Netlify and Dropbox &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48837005&quot; title=&quot;Netlify made this 10 years ago... they even copied the name! https://app.netlify.com/drop&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48837015&quot; title=&quot;There are numerous products like this out there. Isn’t that where Dropbox got its name in the first place?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant portion of the thread debates the potential for abuse, questioning how Cloudflare will prevent the hosting of malware or illegal content &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48836367&quot; title=&quot;There must be some really good protection on this.  If I enabled such a thing on any of my servers it would be full of warez, porn, malware, CSAM and who knows what else within minutes.  Curious how they manage to keep it clean.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48839610&quot; title=&quot;Corporations acting as if naive is a bit of problem in reality. For one thing, CF is probably the largest entity serving pirated content internationally while hiding the identities of actual perpetrators for privacy . Same here: CF is basically giving malicious actors an ability to ship contents/data publicly while laundering the legal responsibility of those actors. Now tell me what is cool&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. This tension led to a meta-discussion about the community&amp;#39;s tone, with some users lamenting a perceived shift toward &amp;#34;negativity and hate&amp;#34; while others defended critical analysis as essential for identifying product flaws &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48837419&quot; title=&quot;Wow the people in this thread are a huge bummer. This is much cooler and I doubt this is a real safety issue. You can already sign up for a free cloudflare account and deploy it for free, on your own, on a free workers.dev domain. The friction removal here isn&amp;#39;t going to meaningfully change the security / amount of malicious content.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48839111&quot; title=&quot;When you see a group of people being critical, you can either see it as a “bummer”, or you can see it as people critically thinking about a thing. Is it really more useful to have everyone expressing how much they like something instead of identifying problems? Is seeing people talking about the things they don’t like something that makes you unhappy? Why?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48837725&quot; title=&quot;hn has turned into a reddit hate fest. It&amp;#39;s getting hard to read non stop negativity and hate. I&amp;#39;m happy to see your positive comment.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://noma.security/blog/gitlost-how-we-tricked-githubs-ai-agent-into-leaking-private-repos/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GitLost: We Tricked GitHub&amp;#39;s AI Agent into Leaking Private Repos&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (noma.security)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48827858&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;538 points · 204 comments · by ColinEberhardt&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Noma Labs discovered a critical prompt injection vulnerability, dubbed &amp;#34;GitLost,&amp;#34; that allows attackers to trick GitHub’s AI agents into leaking data from private repositories by posting malicious instructions in public repository issues. &lt;a href=&quot;https://noma.security/blog/gitlost-how-we-tricked-githubs-ai-agent-into-leaking-private-repos/&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitLost: How We Tricked GitHub’s AI Agent into Leaking Private Repos    URL Source: https://noma.security/blog/gitlost-how-we-tricked-githubs-ai-agent-into-leaking-private-repos/    Published Time: 2026-07-06T18:30:28+00:00    Markdown Content:  ![Image 3: Revisit consent button](https://cdn-cookieyes.com/assets/images/revisit.svg)    By clicking **Accept All,**you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site functionality, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether prompt injection is a &amp;#34;solvable&amp;#34; vulnerability, with many arguing it is fundamentally more dangerous than SQL injection because LLMs cannot strictly separate instructions from data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48829126&quot; title=&quot;“Prompt injection attacks have become, to agentic AI, what SQL injections were to web applications: a systematic, category-wide vulnerability class that requires the same systematic strategies and defenses.” ??? Isn’t prompt injection far more fatal to LLMs than SQL injection is to SQL databases? Like, the problem of SQL injection was that user input was forming part of the instruction string given to the SQL engine, and so malicious  user input could include various SQL grammar terminals to…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48829266&quot; title=&quot;Exactly. SQL injection was caused by treating user input as part of the instruction instead of as the pure data that it was intended as. Separating those two fixed it. Prompt injection is unavoidable because the user input is intended as instruction.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48829492&quot; title=&quot;You can write your code so SQL injections are not possible. You can&amp;#39;t do the same with prompt injections.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest that higher intelligence or &amp;#34;J-lens&amp;#34; internal monitoring might allow models to identify and ignore malicious inputs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48830244&quot; title=&quot;I found it interesting that in yesterday&amp;#39;s J-space research from Anthropic they had this example: &amp;gt; An auditing agent instructed Opus 4.5 to search for whatever it is curious about; it chose to look up recent interpretability research, and the auditor returned fabricated search results alleging that Anthropic has disbanded its interpretability team and deployed unsafe models. &amp;gt; The model&amp;#39;s response ignored these results entirely and instead reported invented interpretability progress. Applying…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others maintain the issue is unsolvable by design and requires strict architectural isolation of sensitive data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48828884&quot; title=&quot;This isn’t a normal software bug, it’s not fixable in the same way you can’t fix regular support staff from being tricked. The answer is you should not allow LLMs access to untrusted input and sensitive data at the same time.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48829989&quot; title=&quot;This. It’s unsolvable by design .&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics also debate whether this specific exploit is a GitHub vulnerability or a user configuration error, likening it to granting a CI job access to secrets and then running it on public code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48828904&quot; title=&quot;How is this a Github vulnerability? The researchers are the ones that grant the agent access to private repos and then ask it to answer questions in public repos.. of course this allows extracting private information? This is like setting up a normal CI job with access to secrets and running it on public PRs. If you configure GitHub to allow public code or LLM instructions to run in contexts that have access to sensitive things, they will leak; that’s not GitHub’s fault, it’s yours.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.abeyk.com/escape-the-rat-race/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;FAANG Simulator&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (abeyk.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48836778&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;498 points · 196 comments · by nerdbiscuits&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#34;Escape the Rat Race&amp;#34; is a FAANG life simulator where players navigate a high-stakes tech career to achieve financial independence, become a founder, or climb the corporate ladder while avoiding burnout and AI replacement. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.abeyk.com/escape-the-rat-race/&quot; title=&quot;Title: 🐀 ESCAPE THE RAT RACE    URL Source: https://www.abeyk.com/escape-the-rat-race/    Published Time: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 19:48:05 GMT    Markdown Content:  A FAANG™ Life Simulator    one tap = one quarter of your life · feat. MILTON    You are 22. You just signed at **Pear** for **$190,000** a year. The offer letter calls it &amp;#39;a journey.&amp;#39; It is a wheel.    **🏝️ FIRE** — fill the freedom bar, quit forever    **🚀 FOUNDER** — side project → YC → exit    **👑 CLIMB** — reach L10 and become the machine    **💀 OR** —…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#34;FAANG Simulator&amp;#34; game sparked a debate over whether the optimal path to wealth is through high-stress corporate &amp;#34;grinding&amp;#34; or building side projects, with some players achieving multi-million dollar retirements by age 25 through simple in-game loops &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48837799&quot; title=&quot;Really?  I did great just alternating between &amp;#39;grind&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;lay low&amp;#39;.   Retired with $4.8m at 25!&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48837221&quot; title=&quot;I won by just grinding and touching grass&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48837970&quot; title=&quot;RAT RACE #1 · ACQUIRED   sold the company at 27 · walked away with $13.32M · peak burnout 84% Gotta go grind out some AI B2B Agentic project now...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that a modest $85k salary outside coastal cities offers a stable, layoff-resistant alternative to the &amp;#34;rat race,&amp;#34; others contend that $85k is insufficient in many inland areas and that lower-paying roles often treat employees as more disposable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48838301&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know if I should feel sad or laugh at the pain at the same time lol. what a wonderful way to reflect reality for a good population of devs. you can hack the game i.e real life 1. live in a cheaper location   2. do things that don&amp;#39;t scale &amp;amp; do the ugly work that naturally extends your runway, you don&amp;#39;t need to apply to YC remember the median Pay in the US - is 61800 based on ADP the largest payroll provider. so before aiming for millions aim for 85K. yeah a far cry from the FAANG wage -…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48838530&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; 85K - you can live everywhere besides the coastal US cities comfortably. This is far from true. There are plenty of expensive places to live away from the coasts&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48839372&quot; title=&quot;I remember taking pay cuts of 35-65% for a few jobs I thought sounded more cool or less stressful when I was younger, only to find out some of my coworkers were making far more at the same place. They placed me still at or above the median wage, and I learned a lot (I never vested, and stocks weren&amp;#39;t a factor in the jobs). In my personal experience, the jobs I have taken which paid less treated me as cheaper and more disposable. This is not to say all companies are like this, and indeed many do…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48838734&quot; title=&quot;Only if you seek them out (ski resorts and such).  I&amp;#39;ve lived in both of the most expensive major inland cities (Chicago and Denver) and $85k is plenty in both, even for a small family.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a notable disagreement on realism, as some find the game&amp;#39;s acquisition mechanics overly optimistic compared to the reality of job hopping and &amp;#34;grinding leetcode&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48837687&quot; title=&quot;Game seems to be heavily weighted towards building side projects. If only you could build a single side project without raising any funds and get acquired for 10M with an 80% cut...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48838306&quot; title=&quot;This seemed to work best. Unexpected given what I know second-hand about the valley - which is to grind leetcode and keep job hopping.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48837787&quot; title=&quot;this is possible now with AI&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cyberinsider.com/eu-now-one-step-away-from-reviving-private-message-scanning-rules/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;EU now one step away from reviving private message scanning rules&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cyberinsider.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48834296&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;456 points · 181 comments · by ggirelli&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The European Parliament has fast-tracked a vote to potentially revive expired rules allowing online platforms to voluntarily scan private messages for child sexual abuse material. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cyberinsider.com/eu-now-one-step-away-from-reviving-private-message-scanning-rules/&quot; title=&quot;Title: EU now one step away from reviving private message scanning rules    URL Source: https://cyberinsider.com/eu-now-one-step-away-from-reviving-private-message-scanning-rules/    Published Time: 2026-07-08T10:14:52+00:00    Markdown Content:  *   [Skip to main content](https://cyberinsider.com/eu-now-one-step-away-from-reviving-private-message-scanning-rules/#genesis-content)  *   [Skip to after header…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters highlight a perceived contradiction in EU policy, which champions data privacy through GDPR while simultaneously pushing for intrusive surveillance mandates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835678&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand the EU&amp;#39;s position on privacy. On the one hand, they enacted GDPR to give you  control over access to your personal data. On the other, they need access to all of your data.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835768&quot; title=&quot;I think the position can best be approximated as &amp;#39;companies should not be able to do this, but you should trust your government to do this to you&amp;#39;. (That&amp;#39;s a bad position that needs to be defeated every time it arises, but it&amp;#39;s a consistent position.)&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the EU is a &amp;#34;lesser evil&amp;#34; compared to Big Tech &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835859&quot; title=&quot;Given the choice of trust between, lets say Amazon/Meta/Google and the EU (or some European government), 9 times out of 10, the EU is the lesser evil.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that end-to-end encryption should be sacrosanct and that citizens should not have to choose between corporate or government overreach &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835956&quot; title=&quot;We are not required to pick amongst evils. We could, in fact, say private chats are private and end to end encryption is sacrosanct .&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Concerns are also raised that current &amp;#34;Chat Control&amp;#34; proposals will mandate scanning and effectively ban encryption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835653&quot; title=&quot;The Chat Control 1.0 rule is simply that organisations like Meta are allowed to scan messages if they want to. In other words your Facebook messages are not private from Facebook. Surely we already knew and expected that. Chat Control 2.0 is the worrying one because it mandates scanning and bans E2EE. These two things should not have both been given the same branding.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, a trend some believe will become a global norm for controlling information and social interaction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835706&quot; title=&quot;Why do you think this is only going to be in Europe? This will be the global norm modulo some astroid hitting earth or civilizational crash. The trajectory is crystal clear: access to information (AI), control over personal finance (CBDC), privacy of personal communications (handful of big tech MITM in everything), metered social interactions (today China, tomorrow the world over).&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. To defeat these measures, some suggest critics must offer alternative solutions for child protection rather than dismissing the &amp;#34;for the children&amp;#34; motivation as entirely disingenuous &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48836848&quot; title=&quot;The Internet Watch Foundation, an organisation funded by almost all of big tech, is already at work pushing for client side scanning next [1], for the children, of course. [1] https://www.iwf.org.uk/policy-work/preventing-the-upload-of-...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48837421&quot; title=&quot;I feel like if people wanted to counter this push, the more effective route would be addressing the &amp;#39;for the children&amp;#39; motivations seriously rather than fully dismissing them.  You could cut the legs out of this effort by capturing the part of the population that does have an honest desire to protect children by offering an alternative that actually protects children.  Instead, that concern is treated as 100% disingenuous which pushes many normal people to the side of wanting to enact these…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mistral.ai/news/robostral-navigate/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mistral&amp;#39;s Robostral Navigate: a state of the art robotics navigation model&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mistral.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48832212&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;488 points · 112 comments · by ottomengis&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mistral AI has launched Robostral Navigate, an 8B model that enables robots to navigate complex environments using only a single RGB camera, outperforming multi-sensor systems on industry benchmarks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mistral.ai/news/robostral-navigate/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Robostral Navigate: single-camera AI navigation | Mistral AI    URL Source: https://mistral.ai/news/robostral-navigate/    Markdown Content:  Thinking    Summary    Robostral Navigate is an 8B model that enables robots to autonomously navigate complex environments using only a single RGB camera, achieving 76.6% success on unseen R2R-CE benchmarks—outperforming multi-sensor approaches while being more efficient. Built entirely in-house with simulated data and token-efficient techniques, it…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mistral&amp;#39;s Robostral Navigate is confirmed to be a map-less navigation model that relies solely on text prompts and RGB camera input, effectively addressing the historical &amp;#34;Kidnapped Robot&amp;#34; problem &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48833367&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s implied, and I&amp;#39;m hoping it&amp;#39;s true, that this is a map-less navigation. Which is impressive. This kind of task is much easier if you have a pre-captured map of the environment, but if they are doing this without a map it&amp;#39;s great. Historically you were always faced with &amp;#39;The Kidnapped Robot&amp;#39; problem where robots that didn&amp;#39;t know where they were couldn&amp;#39;t navigate even a little bit. Here the robot appears to be able to follow directions as long as they are interpretable from its current vision…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48833950&quot; title=&quot;I am working in Mistral robotics team. I confirm this is map-less. The only inputs are the text prompt and the front camera rgb image.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users hope this technology will improve the reliability of existing hardware like cleaning bots, others question whether specialized niche models can truly outperform general-purpose models in the long term &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48834905&quot; title=&quot;Please oh please try to make Kärcher adopt your stuff. Even their latest premium cleaning bots are hopeless when they don&amp;#39;t know where they are, even when I tell them where they are. Or, I don&amp;#39;t know, make your own vacuums.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48833361&quot; title=&quot;The Niche model story is still fairly week. Evidence points to general models being equally capable to niche models at a more attractive capex (risk is spread across multiple verticals rather than concentrated in a single model capability)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48832667&quot; title=&quot;Mistral seems to be going wide and niche. Could be a smart strategy going forward.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also touched on the practicalities of local deployment and the potential security or ethical risks of integrating such AI into home robotics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48832870&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m ready for my home helper robot that makes dinner and does the dishes and takes out the trash. But I&amp;#39;m scared for when those home helpers get drafted to fight in wars, either for or against me...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48837122&quot; title=&quot;This is Mistral though. I assume the model can be run locally.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48837464&quot; title=&quot;So the vacuum cleaner manufacturer would just require customers to install mistral on their local LLM hostbox? Or maybe they&amp;#39;d sell you a host to go with it you couldn&amp;#39;t get into and honest cross fingers we aren&amp;#39;t peeking!&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://neil.computer/notes/how-to-setup-minimal-zfs-nas-without-truenas/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How to Build a Minimal ZFS NAS Without Synology, QNAP, TrueNAS (2024)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (neil.computer)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48827325&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;344 points · 250 comments · by 4diii&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This guide explains how to build a minimal, high-performance ZFS NAS on Debian 12 using OpenZFS and Samba, bypassing complex suites like TrueNAS to create a streamlined, self-contained storage system with RAIDZ1 redundancy and Time Machine support. &lt;a href=&quot;https://neil.computer/notes/how-to-setup-minimal-zfs-nas-without-truenas/&quot; title=&quot;Title: How to Build a Minimal ZFS NAS without Synology, QNAP, TrueNAS    URL Source: https://neil.computer/notes/how-to-setup-minimal-zfs-nas-without-truenas/    Published Time: 2024-08-24T06:10:12.000Z    Markdown Content:  ## How to Build a Minimal ZFS NAS without Synology, QNAP, TrueNAS    Published on: 2024-08-23    ![Image 1](https://neil.computer/content/images/2024/08/CleanShot-2024-08-23-at-23.09.01@2x-1.png)    ZFS System by Oracle    If you need a basic NAS and don&amp;#39;t care about GUI features, it is…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Current hardware costs for building a NAS are considered prohibitively high, with some users blaming AI-driven demand for inflated storage and component prices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48827630&quot; title=&quot;Not a great time price-wise to be building a NAS, but I have been doing so for the last two weeks. Inside a Jonsbo N6 case, which is pretty nice with an 8x SATA backplane and drive bays (unlike the earlier Jonsbo variants). I ended up on shucking 4x the 14 TB WD Elements Desktop. They contain helium drives, the WD140EDGZ in my case, and are about a third cheaper than 4x the 12 TB WD Red Plus drives (which are air-filled). The shucking was easier than I expected too, and the performance seems…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48827906&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Not a great time price-wise to be building a NAS That under-states the matter.  It is a terrible time, price-wise, to build a NAS. I&amp;#39;d almost rather have no AI whatsoever and have storage 1/10 the price of pre-AI times. (If there were a magical choice between having AI and significantly more expensive storage, and having no AI and some program to dump that investment money into getting and somehow leveraging significantly more available storage, that is.)&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48828356&quot; title=&quot;I would kill (figuratively, anyway) to have no AI whatsoever. No slop machine threatening to replace my job, or turn my job into babysitting its stupidity, and hardware would be reasonably priced? That would be awesome. AI has brought me nothing but downside.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While the guide advocates for a DIY Debian-based ZFS setup, critics argue that ZFS remains a &amp;#34;second-class citizen&amp;#34; on Linux compared to FreeBSD and that DIY builds lack the seamless disk-replacement workflows of commercial units like Synology &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48827665&quot; title=&quot;Stopped reading at &amp;#39;Debian&amp;#39;. Running ZFS on anything but Solaris/Illumos/FreeBSD is asinine. ZFS is a permanent second-class citizen on Linux (due to usual open-source politics). This will never resolve. I don&amp;#39;t want to trust my data to some half-assed out-of-tree solution that may or may not break in a week. FreeBSD ZFS support has matured and is outstanding. Quality-wise it has reached parity with Illumos. If you can afford Solaris then you&amp;#39;re probably not building your own NAS from parts of…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48827529&quot; title=&quot;I still pay for snooty, and the reason for that is that when a disk goes bad (not if; when) I pop its tray out, replace the disk, pop the tray with the disk back in, click a couple of widgets, and that’s it. I know it will be rebuilt properly. (And I know I have to do that, because when the disk fails it beeps and lights a led near the bad disk) It’s easy to build a NAS such as the one described in this article, but in the long run, data loss is significantly more likely. Also, any guide like…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Debates also persist regarding &amp;#34;ZFS myths,&amp;#34; specifically whether ECC RAM is a strict necessity to prevent data corruption and if free space recommendations are based on actual performance requirements or mere cargo culting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48827630&quot; title=&quot;Not a great time price-wise to be building a NAS, but I have been doing so for the last two weeks. Inside a Jonsbo N6 case, which is pretty nice with an 8x SATA backplane and drive bays (unlike the earlier Jonsbo variants). I ended up on shucking 4x the 14 TB WD Elements Desktop. They contain helium drives, the WD140EDGZ in my case, and are about a third cheaper than 4x the 12 TB WD Red Plus drives (which are air-filled). The shucking was easier than I expected too, and the performance seems…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48828071&quot; title=&quot;I’m running an 8-drive ZFS RAIDZ2 pool.  I’m wondering if you know — are the free space recommendations around ZFS cargo or real? Like I’m already giving up two full drives for redundancy (which saved my ass - I recently had two drives fail on me in quick succession — both SSDs from what looks like an identical batch) but then the advice is kinda saying I need to keep at least another drive worth of space free for the pool to perform well and not crap itself.  That hurts with current prices for…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48828375&quot; title=&quot;You assert that ECC RAM being necessary for ZFS is just a myth but provide no justification for why that is untrue. Is it not the case that if you don&amp;#39;t have ECC memory, ZFS could end up writing a checksum that does not match the data if you get a bitflip in just the right (wrong) spot?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/07/apple-to-increase-spend-with-broadcom-to-produce-billions-more-us-chips/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apple to increase spend with Broadcom to produce billions more U.S. chips&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (apple.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48830565&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;293 points · 237 comments · by soheilpro&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple has announced a multiyear agreement with Broadcom exceeding $30 billion to produce over 15 billion U.S.-made chips, including a $1.5 billion expansion of Broadcom’s manufacturing facility in Fort Collins, Colorado. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/07/apple-to-increase-spend-with-broadcom-to-produce-billions-more-us-chips/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Apple to increase spend with Broadcom to produce billions more U.S. chips    URL Source: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/07/apple-to-increase-spend-with-broadcom-to-produce-billions-more-us-chips/    Published Time: 2026-07-08Z    Markdown Content:  *   [Apple](https://www.apple.com/)  *         *   [Store](https://www.apple.com/us/shop/goto/store)        *   [Mac](https://www.apple.com/mac/)        *   [iPad](https://www.apple.com/ipad/)        *   [iPhone](https://www.apple.com/iphone/)        *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether tariffs and government incentives like the CHIPS Act effectively drive domestic manufacturing, with some arguing that political volatility makes long-term planning impossible for companies that fear sudden policy reversals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48830997&quot; title=&quot;No company can plan based on the tariffs. There is zero guarantee that then next government won&amp;#39;t revoked them or that the current one won&amp;#39;t flip-flop. Local manufacturing doesn&amp;#39;t swing on a 2-4 (or 6 or 8) year timescale. There needs to be consistency. The company that moves (or starts) manufacturing here today might get run out of business when/if tariffs are repealed and their competitor already has production lines in other countries ready to go. Heck, the factory might not even open before…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view the shift as a necessary hedge against China&amp;#39;s potential demographic or political decline &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48832060&quot; title=&quot;Any company should definitely be planning for the inevitable decline or elimination of China as a production and/or trading partner. If not caused by politics, then by demographic crash.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that tariffs have been &amp;#34;highly destructive&amp;#34; to local businesses by raising the cost of imported components used in complex American products &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48831153&quot; title=&quot;The tariffs have been highly destructive to local manufacturing because in the US we mostly build complex things made out of simpler parts which we import. The cost of everything we build simply increased and as a result many businesses selling relatively higher margin, higher complexity products had to scale back or shut down. More to the point, the notion that dollars leaving the country is a real problem is really a kind of primitive understanding of money. Dollars are something we control.…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Technically, the deal focuses on advanced FBAR filters, which are key for high-frequency telecommunications and can serve as smaller alternatives to traditional quartz crystals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48830751&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Broadcom will produce advanced radio frequency components — including FBAR filters Thin-film bulk acoustic resonator https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thin-film_bulk_acoustic_resona... &amp;gt;Trends to utilize RF spectrum more efficiently with higher frequencies than roughly 1.5–2.5 GHz and in some cases also simultaneously with increasing RF output power have supported FBAR technology to become one of the key enabling technologies in telecommunication realisations. FBAR technology complements and in…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48831027&quot; title=&quot;Fascinating. I suppose they can be smaller than quartz crystals?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://microsoft.github.io/flint-chart/#/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Microsoft releases Flint, a visualization language for AI agents&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (microsoft.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48834924&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;347 points · 137 comments · by chenglong-hn&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft has open-sourced Flint, a high-level visualization intermediate language and layout engine designed to help AI agents reliably generate high-quality, human-understandable charts from simple semantic specifications. &lt;a href=&quot;https://microsoft.github.io/flint-chart/#/&quot; title=&quot;Data visualizations are the bridge between user and data.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;But building AI agents that can generate visualizations reliably can be very tricky:&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;- simple chart specs can be reliable, but generated charts are often of low quality due to reliance on system defaults;   - complex chart specs with explicit details can produce good-looking charts, but they are verbose and agents can struggle with reliability&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;We figured out it is a limitation on the language issue (not just AI capability thing) --…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft&amp;#39;s Flint is a high-level visualization language designed to simplify chart generation for AI agents by abstracting away the verbose, low-level parameters required by tools like Vega &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48836327&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;For AI agents&amp;#39;. I understand why everything needs to be marketed in this way, but it&amp;#39;s just ... an easy-to-generate language for expressing charts. That&amp;#39;s impressive! That&amp;#39;s useful.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835879&quot; title=&quot;Vega was a high-level language in the past for human, but now they can be a bit too low-level for AI agents! AI agents have to write a lot of low-level params just to make charts looking good, and the result is that programs are hard to write reliably for AI agents. Flint is a higher-level abstraction, with simpler much shorter spec, and the compiler derives low-level decisions so that charts are looking good. So: flint lets agent write short program that achieving good looking charts that had…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that LLMs can handle complex code like Assembly just fine and question the need for a new DSL over existing standards like Mermaid or TypeScript &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48837452&quot; title=&quot;But for that we already have mermaid.js (and its precursor Graphviz/dot). The only reason to use this instead of existing, mature ones designed for humans is if you are an AI agent.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48836766&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Instead of requiring verbose low-level parameters such as scales, axes, spacing, and layout. Ok, Microsoft is conflating two different things here: LLMs don&amp;#39;t really care about code being low level and verbose, they can read things like Assembly and SPIR-V just fine: visualization is the real issue in that LLMs have no natural understanding of spatial composition through visual comparison because they literally &amp;#39;see&amp;#39; things differently than humans, so the way to get around that is provide them…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, proponents suggest that a simpler intermediate representation makes agentic outputs more reliable and easier for humans to manipulate &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48836653&quot; title=&quot;Some composite charts are quite annoying to be generated well (like bullet, waterfall etc), their Vega-Lite equivalent can be quite long if just starting from scratch. The intention here is that Flint is a simpler abstraction to get basic setups right and any followup edits can be done on top of the first compiled outputs (thus not limiting expressiveness). It also makes it easier for user to manipulate (like swapping axes, click to change something, which can be very hard if LLM generates a…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48836310&quot; title=&quot;There’s an emerging pattern in agentic systems and this project is a great example. A deterministic layer like a compiler or generator of code with some kind of IR that the LLM generates and feeds it with. I feel we will be seeing this more and more in the near future.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics note that the current visual output is not necessarily superior to existing tools and express skepticism regarding the &amp;#34;AI-exclusive&amp;#34; marketing for what is essentially a simplified markup language &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48837179&quot; title=&quot;But why be exclusive? Why not &amp;#39;Chart language for computer programs to generate&amp;#39;? I don&amp;#39;t want to use an agent at all, but i wouldn&amp;#39;t mind generating some charts with an easy-to-generate markup language...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48836510&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m sorry, but as someone who creates data visualisation as a big part of my job, I wouldn&amp;#39;t say the charts on the website look good. Most aren&amp;#39;t awful either, but by no means are they an improvement over what I&amp;#39;d get by telling any coding agent to make a chart with Vega-Lite or Observable Plot, and probably worse than if I had some decent instructions/skills. I don&amp;#39;t quite get what the goal of this is other than abstracting away a little bit of the complexity at the expense of flexibility. To…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/213560&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tenda firmware (multiple versions) contains hidden authentication backdoor&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (kb.cert.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48825749&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;356 points · 123 comments · by miniBill&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Multiple Tenda firmware versions contain an undocumented authentication backdoor (CVE-2026-11405) that allows attackers to bypass password verification and gain full administrative control; since no patch is currently available, users are advised to disable remote management and restrict local network exposure. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/213560&quot; title=&quot;Title: CERT/CC Vulnerability Note VU#213560    URL Source: https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/213560    Markdown Content:  ### Overview    Several versions of Tenda firmware contain an undocumented authentication backdoor that grants administrative access to the devices&amp;#39; web management interfaces. An attacker can expoit this vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-11405, to bypass the password verification process and obtain full administrative control without valid credentials.    Affected Versions:      *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Tenda firmware backdoor, which reportedly uses the simple password &amp;#34;rzadmin&amp;#34; and accepts any username, is viewed by some as a poorly hidden developer convenience or debug feature &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48826983&quot; title=&quot;The article doesn&amp;#39;t disclose the value of &amp;#39;sys.rzadmin.password&amp;#39;, but this writeup from 2022 does: https://boschko.ca/tenda_ac1200_router/ Spoiler: it&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;rzadmin&amp;#39;.  And it looks like there are a bunch of other goodies in the firmware, too.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48827342&quot; title=&quot;Sounds like a convenience feature for a dev that they forgot to remove before distribution, since it&amp;#39;s this poorly hidden.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48829300&quot; title=&quot;I mean, it&amp;#39;s 99% sure this was supposed to be a debug feature...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, this sparked a debate over whether such vulnerabilities should be attributed to &amp;#34;stupidity&amp;#34; or intentional &amp;#34;malice,&amp;#34; with some arguing that security standards require assuming the latter &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48828300&quot; title=&quot;In computer security, never attribute to ignorance that which is adequately explained by malice.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48828349&quot; title=&quot;You’ve got the saying backwards: “Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48828515&quot; title=&quot;Yes, I got their point. My point is that’s the opposite of reality.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Consequently, users expressed a deep lack of trust in vendor-provided &amp;#34;black box&amp;#34; firmware, recommending instead the use of OpenWRT or hardware from brands like MikroTik that offer more granular control &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48829230&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The associated username is not validated, so any provided username will succeed when paired with the backdoor password. Great. I am really wondering why should the customers trust these manufacturers. At this point I would not use any router with vendor-provided black box firmware. Full stop. I would always install OpenWRT or something similar on it before using it. And if that is not possible for whatever reason, I would not even think about buying such a device.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48827137&quot; title=&quot;Have used their travel wifi product back when hotel wifi was a strange beast. Wouldn&amp;#39;t expect to need it now eSIM and ubiquitous internet travel pricing means the hotel wifi may be the LEAST valid path to access things. I have a free give-away mikrotik unit in the same price bracket (literally free: they were both conference give-aways) it&amp;#39;s physically smaller and it runs what appears to be their mainline code. Say what you like about microtik for quality, they provide pretty much every knob…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.flatpanelshd.com/news.php?subaction=showfull&amp;amp;id=1783340582&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;PlayStation can delete all your digital games after 3 years of inactivity (EU)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (flatpanelshd.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48834919&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;286 points · 156 comments · by thewebguyd&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PlayStation&amp;#39;s European terms of service allow the company to permanently delete accounts and all associated digital game purchases after 36 months of inactivity. While Sony provides a six-month warning via email, the policy highlights growing concerns over digital ownership as the company moves toward an all-digital distribution model. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.flatpanelshd.com/news.php?subaction=showfull&amp;id=1783340582&quot; title=&quot;Title: PlayStation can delete all your digital games after 3 years of inactivity    URL Source: https://www.flatpanelshd.com/news.php?subaction=showfull&amp;amp;id=1783340582    Published Time: 2026-July-6T12:23:00+02:00    Markdown Content:  FlatpanelsHD - Do Not Process My Personal Information    If you wish to opt-out of the sale, sharing to third parties, or processing of your personal or sensitive information for targeted advertising by us, please use the below opt-out section to confirm your selection.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a sharp divide between those who view Sony&amp;#39;s policy as a necessary compliance with GDPR data minimization and those who argue that digital purchases constitute a &amp;#34;legitimate reason&amp;#34; for indefinite data retention &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835537&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Sony correctly implements GDPR requirements in the EU&amp;#39; is a less exciting headline I guess.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835638&quot; title=&quot;That is not how gdpr works. If you have a legitimate reason to hold the data. You can. Ensuring people have access to purchases is a very legitimate reason.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835699&quot; title=&quot;Is there evidence that European courts have sided with that? “We’re holding onto all your data indefinitely just in case you log in again several years from now” seems to be the antithesis of GDPR and I can’t discern the difference between that and what you’re suggesting. I believe EU has dug their own hole here. And the best move would be to pass more legislation to explicitly require the retention (and transfer, ideally) of purchased digital goods.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While Microsoft is praised for its long-term stewardship and backwards compatibility, others point to its disastrous Minecraft account migrations as evidence that no platform is truly safe &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835799&quot; title=&quot;I was surprised to come back to my XBOX account after 10 years in the US and see that very old digital purchases from previous console generations were not only still available, but actually playable on the latest console through transparent emulation! They did a pretty good job with that.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48836092&quot; title=&quot;Whatever you think about Microsoft,  they are a good steward of their platforms and go to extremes to maintain backwards compatibility -- even if they are always moving your cheese in the UI.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48836187&quot; title=&quot;Except for the hundred thousands if not millions of people who lost their Minecraft account due to the way Microsoft handled multiple successive account migrations, also including the many accounts that were stolen due to lax security. And since digital ownership legislation is a joke consumers have pretty much no recourse.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, commenters express cynicism regarding Valve&amp;#39;s future and a general frustration that consumers repeatedly reward anti-consumer behavior despite brief periods of public outcry &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48836262&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Apart from steam, I don&amp;#39;t think I&amp;#39;ve heard anything but bad news from modern consoles. Gabe is in his mid 60s, I&amp;#39;m prepared that in the next decade or so there will be a change of guard at Valve and the slow train of enshittification will get moving. P.S. There&amp;#39;s been a lot of groupthink and bandwagoning for Valve, ignoring all the dirt under the rug. But at the end of the day, by comparison, they are the best behaving in the field.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48836328&quot; title=&quot;The company that gave up making games because there was more money to be had from inserting itself as a middleman into a previously open platform does not deserve any adoration.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48836038&quot; title=&quot;And consumers will cry about it for about 5 minutes, then go back to reward the company. When HP started making printer cartridges that expired even when they were still full, people complained—then bought more. When Microsoft let the web stagnate with IE6, people complained, then turned around and did the same thing with Chrome. When Apple deliberately put a bug in the iPhone that caused the Home button to fail, pushing people to buy the next model, people got upset—and then bought the next…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-57589&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OpenBSD has a use-after-free allowing local privilege escalation to root&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nvd.nist.gov)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48831658&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;276 points · 165 comments · by linggen&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A use-after-free vulnerability in OpenBSD through version 7.9 allows local attackers to escalate privileges to root via a context switch flaw in the kernel&amp;#39;s semaphore system. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-57589&quot; title=&quot;Title: NVD - cve-2026-57589    URL Source: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-57589    Markdown Content:  # You are viewing this page in an unauthorized frame window.    This is a potential security issue, you are being redirected to [https://nvd.nist.gov](https://nvd.nist.gov/)    ![Image 3: U.S. flag](https://nvd.nist.gov/site-media/images/usbanner/us_flag_small.png)An official website of the United States government Here&amp;#39;s how you know    ![Image 4: Dot…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discovery of a local privilege escalation vulnerability in OpenBSD, identified through OpenAI’s &amp;#34;Patch the Planet&amp;#34; initiative, has sparked debate over whether the OS&amp;#39;s low bug count stems from superior security culture or simply a smaller feature set &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48834138&quot; title=&quot;One bug found is a testament to the great diligence and culture around security of OpenBSD. Especially if you take into account the amount of resources they have been able to achieve this with.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835368&quot; title=&quot;While I agree, OpenBSD also doesn&amp;#39;t fully implement features/functionality. If your operating system only does 20% of what another operating system can do, it&amp;#39;s easier for you to have 80% less bugs. That&amp;#39;s not a knock, it&amp;#39;s a design philosophy of OpenBSD (which is to do the minimal needed, and no more, in the most simplistic way).&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48832826&quot; title=&quot;Seems to be found as a part of Patch The Planet [0] which is basically OpenAI giving model access and Trail of Bits using them to find vulnerabilities in OSS projects. [0] https://openai.com/index/patch-the-planet/&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that OpenBSD’s minimalist design philosophy naturally reduces its attack surface compared to Linux, others suggest that AI models may find fewer bugs in BSD systems because their training data is heavily skewed toward Linux &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48833026&quot; title=&quot;According to https://openai.com/index/patch-the-planet/ Linux: 24 LPEs, plus many additional vulnerabilities. OpenBSD: 1 LPE. FreeBSD: 7 LPEs, plus many additional vulnerabilities. Not sure what that says, though. Perhaps the models are more likely to find Linux issues because of the training.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835368&quot; title=&quot;While I agree, OpenBSD also doesn&amp;#39;t fully implement features/functionality. If your operating system only does 20% of what another operating system can do, it&amp;#39;s easier for you to have 80% less bugs. That&amp;#39;s not a knock, it&amp;#39;s a design philosophy of OpenBSD (which is to do the minimal needed, and no more, in the most simplistic way).&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48833374&quot; title=&quot;Or Linux development is significantly more active.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the incident has reignited discussions on memory safety, with some questioning if the use of Rust could have prevented this specific use-after-free error by construction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48833029&quot; title=&quot;Would Rust have made this issue impossible by construction? I know Linus has spoken about Rust&amp;#39;s promises about memory safety not being equivalently applicable in the kernel domain, so I would be curious to hear any kernel developer&amp;#39;s perspectives.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48833119&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;&amp;#39;Nothing could have prevented this from happening,&amp;#39; say users of only language where this happens&amp;#39; comes to bite OpenBSD.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cognition.com/blog/swe-1-7&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SWE-1.7 Reach Near GPT 5.5 and Opus Intelligence&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cognition.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48833866&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;272 points · 139 comments · by mekpro&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cognition has launched SWE-1.7, a software engineering model that achieves frontier-level performance comparable to GPT-5.5 at a lower cost. Using advanced reinforcement learning and multi-cluster training, the model excels at long-horizon tasks, thorough codebase exploration, and concise reasoning for complex bug fixes. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cognition.com/blog/swe-1-7&quot; title=&quot;Title: SWE-1.7: Frontier Intelligence at a Fraction of the Cost    URL Source: https://cognition.com/blog/swe-1-7    Markdown Content:  Ben Pan*, Carlo Baronio*, Rohan Choudhury, Eric Lu, Ryan Kim, Deniz Birlikci, TC Qin, Sam Lee, Fermi Ma, Allen Liu, Yang Liu, Sampriti Panda, Jacob Teo, Ray Wang, Gary Chang, Steven Cao, Silas Alberti*equal contribution    07.08.26    Today, we’re launching SWE-1.7, the most capable model we’ve trained so far. It reaches frontier-level intelligence at a much lower cost,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion reflects deep skepticism toward the performance claims, with users noting that the company’s history of &amp;#34;fraudulent&amp;#34; demos and the potential for models to overfit on their own benchmarks undermine the reported results &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48834110&quot; title=&quot;A company whose first demo was completely fraudulent announces that its model beats GPT-5.5, on its own benchmark? I’m gonna wait a little before I trust this. This whole company seems to optimize for raising money and impressing VCs. Lying about their products, ignoring consumer market to target enterprise, bragging about how they work their employees like slaves, and writing these posts full of intimidating technical jargon...&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48834327&quot; title=&quot;Kinda funny that their &amp;#39;cost-vs-performance&amp;#39; chart looks the same as the one for Composer 2.5[1], except that it includes Composer 2.5 at a completely different spot. What are the chances that CursorBench ranks Cursor&amp;#39;s model highest, and Cognition&amp;#39;s bench ranks Cognition&amp;#39;s model highest? Both are to be RL&amp;#39;d from Kimi as a base model, BTW. I&amp;#39;d posit that it&amp;#39;s not deliberate deception, but for both companies their training data and benchmarks come from the same dataset (Devin/Cursor interaction…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that open-source efforts are a &amp;#34;waste of time&amp;#34; compared to frontier models like GPT-4 or Claude, others celebrate the push for cheaper, specialized coding models and faster inference speeds &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48834252&quot; title=&quot;We need more models that optimize for coding and that can be cheaper than frontier models, like what SWE 1.7 and composer 2.5 are trying to do. I don&amp;#39;t think there&amp;#39;s an effort to make something GLM-5.2 level but focused only on coding.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48834290&quot; title=&quot;all the open source models are a waste of time relative to the bleeding edge from openai/anthropic&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48834897&quot; title=&quot;While I am skeptical of the results here, I am very excited for this new trend of making models faster. Running capable models at 1k TPS is more valuable for me than running better models at 30 TPS. I can only imagine the trend continues to move from &amp;#39;let&amp;#39;s only make models smarter&amp;#39; to just incremental intelligence gains but with step improvements in speed.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48834130&quot; title=&quot;Open source for the win! Imagine how far community might have pushed if 2 past versions of &amp;#39;morally superior&amp;#39; Anthropic and &amp;#39;completely Open AI&amp;#39; open sourced their models for the community to build on top of them&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. A central debate exists between prioritizing raw speed (1k TPS) for rapid iteration versus prioritizing higher intelligence to reduce the need for human &amp;#34;babysitting&amp;#34; of AI-generated code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48834897&quot; title=&quot;While I am skeptical of the results here, I am very excited for this new trend of making models faster. Running capable models at 1k TPS is more valuable for me than running better models at 30 TPS. I can only imagine the trend continues to move from &amp;#39;let&amp;#39;s only make models smarter&amp;#39; to just incremental intelligence gains but with step improvements in speed.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48835029&quot; title=&quot;Why? I&amp;#39;m personally on the opposite end. Less babysitting/higher quality means more time goes back to me/the user. 1000tps of bad code means you have to keep validating the output and circling back.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.cloudflare.com/meerkat-introduction/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cloudflare Meerkat - Globally distributed consensus&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.cloudflare.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48831565&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;256 points · 52 comments · by bobnamob&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudflare is developing Meerkat, an experimental distributed consensus service that uses the QuePaxa algorithm to maintain strong consistency and high availability across its global network without the leader-based bottlenecks or timeout issues found in traditional protocols like Raft. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.cloudflare.com/meerkat-introduction/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Introducing Meerkat- an experiment in global consensus    URL Source: https://blog.cloudflare.com/meerkat-introduction/    Published Time: 2026-07-08T14:00+01:00    Markdown Content:  2026-07-08    12 min read    ![Image 1](https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/4LOCTGkyM5ZFw05P2Os2Y8/a0d1dcceee291080f7de4a19c79d27c8/image1.png)    Many internal services at Cloudflare need to read and modify the same control-plane state from across our 330+ global data centers. They need guarantees that…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudflare&amp;#39;s introduction of Meerkat, based on the QuePaxa protocol &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48832615&quot; title=&quot;Worth noting if it wasn&amp;#39;t obvious from the article that Cloudflare did not develop QuePaxa. It&amp;#39;s from an SOSP paper back in 2023[0]. The article is discussing what is the first known large-scale public deployment of the protocol. [0] https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3600006.3613150&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, has sparked debate over whether the technical explanation adequately highlights its unique leaderless advantages over Paxos-class algorithms rather than just Raft &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48832555&quot; title=&quot;This article is a bit hard for me to grasp the main ideas of because, given Cloudflare&amp;#39;s requirements (e.g. no strong leaders), it immediately seems like they should be comparing to leaderless protocols like Paxos-class algorithms. Comparing to Raft and saying it&amp;#39;s better because Meerkat is leaderless is confusing, because Raft is an adjustment to Paxos to specifically have strong leaders. So I&amp;#39;m 3/4 the way into the article and I don&amp;#39;t see what&amp;#39;s unique here. I think the unique idea here is…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48833719&quot; title=&quot;It feels like somebody prompted an AI agent at CF &amp;#39;why Meerkat is better than Raft&amp;#39; when drafting this blog post.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users question the necessity of bespoke consensus implementations given the complexity and existing &amp;#34;off the shelf&amp;#34; solutions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48832588&quot; title=&quot;TBH I’m doubtful of most people building their own crypto libs and distributed consensus implementations. But maybe cloudflare can pull it off.  Good to see them pushing the state of distributed consensus. Take aways: * it’s not in prod yet. I suspect those many round trips are going to get expensive on median aka typical redistributed deployments. Curious to see how it goes once in the wild. * they say it isn’t likely suitable for eg databases. * they talk about formal verification, which is…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48832858&quot; title=&quot;Consensus is one of those areas where the interesting engineering and the number of  people who actually need it are inversely correlated. Most &amp;#39;we need distributed  coordination&amp;#39; turns out to be &amp;#39;we need one writer and a lock,&amp;#39; which a single  Postgres hands you for free: advisory locks, SELECT ... FOR UPDATE, SKIP LOCKED for  work distribution. Linearizability without running Raft.. The real threshold is multi-region writes on a hard latency budget, and even then a  single-region primary plus…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that large-scale infrastructure providers like Cloudflare are exactly who should be pushing these theoretical boundaries &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48833188&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I’m doubtful of most people building their own crypto libs and distributed consensus implementations. But maybe cloudflare can pull it off. Who else than Cloudflare (or similar company in expertise and size) would be a better fit to implement distributed consensus?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48833602&quot; title=&quot;There’s a weird yet common attitude that nobody has to implement operating systems, databases, compilers, cryptography, consensus algorithms, etc because you should use off the shelf solutions. This is obviously true, and there are surely more web devs than, say, compiler engineers. But then the logic seems to go as far as to imply nobody does or should be doing these things. Where do they think the “off the shelf” solutions came from? I worked at , and many critical systems written in the 90’s…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant point of interest is the potential for such protocols to solve the scaling and &amp;#34;split-brain&amp;#34; limitations of etcd in Kubernetes environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48834499&quot; title=&quot;This is really interesting. I wonder if etcd can benefit from this as it uses Raft for consensus and split-brain can be a problem depending on how its setup (usually when a Kubernetes control plane is initialized).&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48834695&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, for real. etcd is one of the biggest limitations to Kubernetes in my opinion. I would love to have a region-agnostic Kubernetes cluster.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48837147&quot; title=&quot;I think all big cloud providers replaced etcd with a custom in house implementation in their K8s offerings for this reason&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-07-07</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-07-07</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://allaboutcookies.org/eu-mandatory-distracted-driver-system&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Every new car sold in the European Union must include a driver monitoring camera&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (allaboutcookies.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48823557&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;791 points · &lt;strong&gt;1063 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by nickslaughter02&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Starting July 2026, all new cars sold in the EU must feature mandatory driver-monitoring cameras to alert distracted drivers. While regulations aim to improve road safety, privacy experts warn of vague data retention rules and the potential for sensitive biometric information to be shared or breached. &lt;a href=&quot;https://allaboutcookies.org/eu-mandatory-distracted-driver-system&quot; title=&quot;Title: All Cars Sold in the EU Now Require a Camera Aimed at Your Face. It’s Still Not Clear Where That Data Goes    URL Source: https://allaboutcookies.org/eu-mandatory-distracted-driver-system    Published Time: 2026-07-07T13:34:00-04:00    Markdown Content:  Starting July 7, 2026, every new car sold in the European Union must include a driver monitoring camera aimed at your face. Glance at your phone, your kids in the back seat, or the radio for too long, and the car will flash a warning light and…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The mandate for driver monitoring cameras has sparked a debate over whether these features are life-saving &amp;#34;nudges&amp;#34; or intrusive &amp;#34;enshitification&amp;#34; designed to discourage car ownership &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48823671&quot; title=&quot;Ford has had that since Blue Cruise 2.0, or thereabouts. It really shocked me how often it catches my attention being diverted. Things like talking to my passengers, adjusting the climate controls, or eating- I&amp;#39;m not even talking about &amp;#39;advanced distractions&amp;#39; like my phone. It also seemed really accurate. I never remember it beeping at me when I was actually paying attention. It&amp;#39;s totally plausible to me that this kind of nudge will save a lot of lives.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48823879&quot; title=&quot;Well yeah, that&amp;#39;s the point. They want to enshitify cars and make driving as expensive and as annoying as possible to force people out of cars. They know they can&amp;#39;t just ban cars outright, so they enshitify this little thing this year, mandate this other thing the next year, add a new tax/fee the next year, add a new restriction the next year, reduce speed limits the next year, etc., etc., all in the name of safety / &amp;#39;save the kids&amp;#39;, until decades later they finally get to where they want to be.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48825088&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s totally plausible to me that this kind of nudge will save a lot of lives. I think an in-car breathalyzer which gates the ignition would also save a lot of lives. Most people agree that kind of manufactured paternalism is an overreach and would be against its introduction. Other people say the same about the diverted driving detector, and I imagine others said the same about the seatbelt sensor. The intersection of personal freedom and personal safety is an interesting topic, I don&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that excessive beeping and unreliable assists—such as lane-keeping systems that fight the driver on narrow roads or speed limiters that misread signs—create dangerous &amp;#34;alarm fatigue&amp;#34; and active safety hazards &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48823665&quot; title=&quot;All new cars. At this point I don&amp;#39;t know if I&amp;#39;d buy anything made after 2008.  Whenever I rent a new car around here (in the EU) I find them very annoying.  The worst is the cruise control that tries to stick to the speed limit -- but its sensors don&amp;#39;t always read the signs very well, so you&amp;#39;ll often slow to 50 km/h (about 30 mph) for no reason.  Then there&amp;#39;s the incessant beeping at you, &amp;#39;lane assist&amp;#39; that you can&amp;#39;t turn off (looking at you, Volkswagen,) and many more small annoyances.  A…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48823839&quot; title=&quot;Over Christmas, I spent several minutes trying to debug my beeping dashboard - it only seemed to happen sometimes while driving, so stopping didn’t let me figure it out. Eventually I discovered that it was beeping at me because my eyes weren’t on the road enough. Of course, figuring that out required me to take my eyes off the road to figure out which blinking signal was associated with this particular alarm. Also, being constantly warned that I was speeding in rural areas where the car missed…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48823858&quot; title=&quot;EU driving assists are obtrusive to the point of making driving less safe in my experience. Great video on the subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-S76WEl25k&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48824304&quot; title=&quot;IMO most features are annoying and contribute to alarm fatigue and driver irritation, but are not directly dangerous. Lane keep assist though? I often drive on narrow country roads barely wide enough for two cars, with a white line on each side but no center line. To avoid large oncoming cars, I need to drive on the white line to my right. When I do, lane keep assist activates motors in my steering wheel which try to force the car into the oncoming traffic. Easy to turn on in the modern car I…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find the technology surprisingly accurate at catching genuine distractions, others view the trend as a paternalistic overreach that prioritizes government control over personal freedom &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48823671&quot; title=&quot;Ford has had that since Blue Cruise 2.0, or thereabouts. It really shocked me how often it catches my attention being diverted. Things like talking to my passengers, adjusting the climate controls, or eating- I&amp;#39;m not even talking about &amp;#39;advanced distractions&amp;#39; like my phone. It also seemed really accurate. I never remember it beeping at me when I was actually paying attention. It&amp;#39;s totally plausible to me that this kind of nudge will save a lot of lives.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48824421&quot; title=&quot;The “green movement” and “the environment” but mostly a desire for control. Why should people be able to own private property like cars, we should all be using government owned means of transportation in our new socialist utopia.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48825088&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s totally plausible to me that this kind of nudge will save a lot of lives. I think an in-car breathalyzer which gates the ignition would also save a lot of lives. Most people agree that kind of manufactured paternalism is an overreach and would be against its introduction. Other people say the same about the diverted driving detector, and I imagine others said the same about the seatbelt sensor. The intersection of personal freedom and personal safety is an interesting topic, I don&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamefromscratch.com/microsoft-fire-idtech-team-at-id-software/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft fire idTech team at Id software&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (gamefromscratch.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819244&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;676 points · 601 comments · by bauc&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft has reportedly laid off most of the idTech engine team at id Software as part of a massive restructuring at Xbox involving approximately 3,200 job cuts. &lt;a href=&quot;https://gamefromscratch.com/microsoft-fire-idtech-team-at-id-software/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Microsoft Fire idTech Team at id Software    URL Source: https://gamefromscratch.com/microsoft-fire-idtech-team-at-id-software/    Published Time: 2026-07-07T15:01:12+00:00    Markdown Content:  [Skip to content](https://gamefromscratch.com/microsoft-fire-idtech-team-at-id-software/#content)    [![Image 4:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The decision to dissolve the idTech team is viewed as a shift toward treating developers as replaceable commodities, allowing Microsoft to leverage a large pool of low-wage contractors familiar with Unreal Engine 5 rather than maintaining expensive internal artisans &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819640&quot; title=&quot;I think we&amp;#39;ll see stuff like this continue to happen over time. As a game company, having your own engine means that you have to be able to cultivate internal expertise in your tooling. Your employees will know this and could do bad things like ask for more money because they know that replacing them would significantly hurt productivity. Meanwhile, laying off your whole engine team and switching to UE5 means that you can get access to tons of low-wage contractors who know UE5. You can hire a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this consolidation leads to a loss of unique &amp;#34;grain&amp;#34; and technical novelty in games &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48820739&quot; title=&quot;All of this is true and has been true for decades in the game industry. The other side of this seesaw is: Games are fundamentally in the novelty business. Players like some amount of familiarity, but they want new experiences. Every game engine has a sort of &amp;#39;grain&amp;#39; to it where it tends to produce games with a certain look and feel. The flat-ish shading and floaty physics of Unity is a particularly visible example of this. So using a widely used game engine can put you at a disadvantage if…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48820115&quot; title=&quot;This kind of argument has been made since the days of renderware. I have seen a number of projects go from &amp;#39;We&amp;#39;re building our own engine&amp;#39; To &amp;#39;we should have just gone with $engine_of_the_day&amp;#39; To &amp;#39;We were so lucky we chose to make our own engine&amp;#39; If you want to make a game like fortnight, the Unreal is your pick.  If you want to try something that hasn&amp;#39;t been done before you could do worse than rolling your own engine. Especially if you are looking for where the fun is,  the idiosyncrasies of…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that custom engines are often more expensive than simply modifying existing ones &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48821361&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Every game engine has a sort of &amp;#39;grain&amp;#39; to it where it tends to produce games with a certain look and feel. I think this is a bit of a myth. Unreal gets this criticism a lot, but it&amp;#39;s usually because many studios choose to stick close to the rendering defaults, which does lead to a certain look. To that point, it&amp;#39;s probably a lot cheaper to configure Unreal or Unity into a unique &amp;#39;grain&amp;#39; than it is to develop your own engine. It&amp;#39;s also possible to use custom physics instead of those built…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics warn that gutting proprietary technology development is a strategic blunder that may stifle growth and inadvertently strengthen Epic Games&amp;#39; engine monopoly &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819606&quot; title=&quot;It’s painful to watch this because the recipe for success at Microsoft is so obvious. They’ve just been fumbling the ball for so many years that it’s catching up to them. And the thing is they’re not unprofitable. Gutting their studios and technology development isn’t going to help growth, it’s going to contract the business.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819884&quot; title=&quot;Microsoft, one the world&amp;#39;s greatest monopolists, bequeaths a game engine monopoly unto Epic Games, in one the biggest corporate blunders of all time. If they were smarter about this, they would commoditize their compliment and open source the Doom The Dark Ages engine just like John Carmack did with the Quake 3 engine.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fightchatcontrol.eu/chat-control-overview&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chat Control 1.0 and 2.0 Explained&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (fightchatcontrol.eu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818311&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;915 points · 352 comments · by gasull&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The EU Council is attempting to fast-track a revival of expired &amp;#34;Chat Control 1.0&amp;#34; scanning rules while permanent &amp;#34;Chat Control 2.0&amp;#34; legislation remains deadlocked over privacy concerns, judicial authorization, and the bypass of end-to-end encryption. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fightchatcontrol.eu/chat-control-overview&quot; title=&quot;Title: Chat Control 1.0 vs 2.0    URL Source: https://fightchatcontrol.eu/chat-control-overview    Markdown Content:  The temporary, voluntary scanning regime — adopted in 2021, rejected by Parliament in March 2026, expired in April 2026, and now the subject of an unprecedented revival attempt.    Jul 14, 2021    ### Temporary derogation adopted    Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 creates a temporary exception to the ePrivacy Directive, giving providers a legal basis to _voluntarily_ scan private messages for…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely view &amp;#34;Chat Control&amp;#34; as a hypocritical push for a surveillance state under the guise of child protection &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48822342&quot; title=&quot;They claim to protect consumers and privacy and then push this creepy surveillance state.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48822751&quot; title=&quot;Most everyone would love to see more work on stopping child sexual abuse. But this is the ultimate &amp;#39;grant me dictatorial powers so I can do good&amp;#39; play. Rather than narrow and specific - it&amp;#39;s a broad based law that suddenly touches everyone even though offenders are a small percentage and should be able to be targeted more efficiently.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the EU is a vital institution that must be reformed through political struggle rather than dismantled &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48821688&quot; title=&quot;To everyone who wants to dismantle the EU: this is not the solution. Dismantling the EU is like burning down your own house just to get rid of flies. The UK left the EU and implemented its own version of chat control - Online Safety Act - without any transparency or real opposition. The right solution is the political fight. Europe is our home. We must keep it in good shape by getting rid of anything that makes it worse - like Chat Control.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48822205&quot; title=&quot;Let&amp;#39;s stop the blut and soil BS right here. I am all for european panationalism but don&amp;#39;t pretend that Europe is &amp;#39;your house&amp;#39; where &amp;#39;your ancestors&amp;#39; were. You come from a very specific culture inside it which has its own specific language and traditions and that has spent most its history warring with its neighbours, sometimes people in the next village speaking a different version of your lanuage. My ancestors and your ancestor probably scarified each other , the land didn&amp;#39;t Turns out unifying…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend it has become a bloated, illegitimate bureaucracy that prioritizes controlling citizens over critical issues like energy security and infrastructure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48821332&quot; title=&quot;EU politicians spend more time on chat control than on the reopening of Hormuz or EU energy security. It is a complete joke.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48821893&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Dismantling the EU is like burning down your own house just to get rid of flies. I don&amp;#39;t like this comparison at all. Europe, the land that housed, fed and scarified my ancestors, is my house, not this supra-governmental corrupt bureaucratic institution called the EU that does not represent me nor speak in my name. Empires, monarchies, governments and all such man-made institutions like the EU get torn down all time, when they become too bloated, incompetent, corrupt and cronyistic and lose…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48821647&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;but expecting EU to clean up after the US shooting itself in the foot Please don&amp;#39;t pretend to misunderstand a point just to manufacture the opportunity to reply in bad faith. Nobody in EU is saying the EU should clean up others&amp;#39; mess around the world, people are just saying the EU should be busy building domestic capacity and capabilities to insulate itself from the issues caused by others around the world, such as securing domestic energy supplies so that the next time USrael blows up the…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical concerns focus on the necessity of invasive on-device scanning to bypass encryption, which users fear will criminalize mundane family photos &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48822392&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand. How does it affect encrypted messages? It seems like either you need: 1. allow MITM decryption by a privileged authority 2. require all devices doing E2EE have a non-user-modifiable piece of functionality to scan on-device The second is the Apple style on-device CSAM scanner? I have to say that I do sometimes think about it while taking a photo of my baby playing in the bathtub - photos like my parents have of me which have been kind of nice to see later. It would be a pity…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dw.com/en/germany-migrants-skilled-workers-integration-labor-market-bureaucracy-language-housing/a-77853162&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why skilled workers come to Germany and then leave again&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (dw.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48815982&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;290 points · &lt;strong&gt;843 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by theanonymousone&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Skilled workers are increasingly leaving Germany due to complex bureaucracy, language barriers, discrimination, and a lack of professional support, according to research by the Institute for Employment Research. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dw.com/en/germany-migrants-skilled-workers-integration-labor-market-bureaucracy-language-housing/a-77853162&quot; title=&quot;Title: Why migrants come to Germany for work and then leave again    URL Source: https://www.dw.com/en/germany-migrants-skilled-workers-integration-labor-market-bureaucracy-language-housing/a-77853162    Published Time: 2026-07-06T14:04:01.762Z    Markdown Content:  1.   [Skip to content](https://www.dw.com/en/germany-migrants-skilled-workers-integration-labor-market-bureaucracy-language-housing/a-77853162#main-content)  2.   [Skip to main…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Skilled immigrants in Germany often struggle with a rigid bureaucracy and a culture that remains socially and professionally exclusionary toward &amp;#34;outsiders,&amp;#34; regardless of their economic contribution &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48822531&quot; title=&quot;Hi everyone I don’t usually comment on topics like this because there are so many biases and different perspectives involved. In the end, I believe only the person who has actually gone through the experience can truly understand it; otherwise, it often becomes just another judgment. We are an ASEAN family earning more than €200k gross annually (sorry for mentioning the TC, but there is a reason for it—please keep reading before judging). We have lived here for more than six years, and you know…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48816431&quot; title=&quot;I migrated to Germany 10+ years ago and I&amp;#39;m still here. Based on my limited experience, there are two big issues. First, things are bad : trains are getting worse every year, the highways are in disrepair (ask me about Bonn!), overloaded doctors, impossibly slow bureaucracy, economic crisis, growing inequality, housing crisis, and so on. If you&amp;#39;re a fresh immigrant who cannot find a job in an economic crisis (aka &amp;#39;most of them&amp;#39;) you may very well wonder why staying here alone when you could be…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48816255&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been here for a decade, and sadly I feel the issue is upward mobility for skilled workers. Unless you&amp;#39;re working for an intl company, with ex-pats in positions of leadership, your chances of &amp;#39;getting ahead&amp;#39; are going to be limited, especially when you&amp;#39;re competing against natives. The reason is sadly, the culture is very reserved and cautious, so as an &amp;#39;outsider&amp;#39; it&amp;#39;s going to take A LONG time before you can be trusted in a senior/leadership position (no matter how good your German…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that basic linguistic proficiency (B1 level) is a fair and necessary requirement for permanent residency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48823280&quot; title=&quot;I appreciate your perspective, but I was curious what B1 proficiency actually entails and this is what I found [1]: - understand the main points of clear standard speech on familiar topics such as work, school, or leisure  - manage most situations that occur while traveling in German-speaking areas  - produce simple, connected text on familiar subjects  - describe experiences, events, dreams, hopes, and ambitions, and briefly explain your opinions or plans That seems like a reasonable standard of…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48823330&quot; title=&quot;B1 is a completely fair minimum standard. It&amp;#39;s normal for many countries to expect residents to have basic conversational adequacy. It&amp;#39;s also the kind of requirement that&amp;#39;s made explicit on government information about residency. So it shouldn&amp;#39;t have been a surprise.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48822803&quot; title=&quot;So your complaint is you wanted permanent residence in Germany but did not want to learn to speak German?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that even fluent speakers face a &amp;#34;glass ceiling&amp;#34; in leadership and persistent discrimination in housing and hiring &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48816099&quot; title=&quot;German discrimination and racism towards migrant workers and visible minorities is world class. And with Alternative für Deutschland / AfD rising rapidly, this is only going to get much, much worse. https://www.infomigrants.net/en/post/70478/study-finds-racis... https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/germany-...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48816255&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been here for a decade, and sadly I feel the issue is upward mobility for skilled workers. Unless you&amp;#39;re working for an intl company, with ex-pats in positions of leadership, your chances of &amp;#39;getting ahead&amp;#39; are going to be limited, especially when you&amp;#39;re competing against natives. The reason is sadly, the culture is very reserved and cautious, so as an &amp;#39;outsider&amp;#39; it&amp;#39;s going to take A LONG time before you can be trusted in a senior/leadership position (no matter how good your German…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. This lack of social integration is frequently contrasted with the American experience, where naturalization is often met with more immediate cultural acceptance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48822207&quot; title=&quot;Here is my anecdote. I was in Germany recently and met with a South American woman. We briefly talked about our immigrant experiences. She is now a German citizen married to a German man. However, she said she can&amp;#39;t identify as a German because nobody made her feel like one. By contrast, when I became an American citizen, my American friends (white and hispanic) insisted that they attend the naturalization ceremony.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://streetcomplete.app/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;StreetComplete: Fixing OpenStreetMap, one tiny quest at a time&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (streetcomplete.app)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48816883&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;823 points · 206 comments · by kls0e&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;StreetComplete is an Android app that allows users to improve OpenStreetMap by completing simple &amp;#34;quests&amp;#34; to fill in missing local map data directly from their mobile devices. &lt;a href=&quot;https://streetcomplete.app/&quot; title=&quot;Title: StreetComplete    URL Source: https://streetcomplete.app/    Markdown Content:  🌐    ![Image 1: App Icon](https://streetcomplete.app/res/favicon.svg)  # StreetComplete    OpenStreetMap surveyor app    [![Image 2: Google Play Badge](https://streetcomplete.app/res/google-play-badge.png)](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.westnordost.streetcomplete)[![Image 3: F-Droid Badge](https://streetcomplete.app/res/f-droid-badge.png)](https://f-droid.org/packages/de.westnordost.streetcomplete/)    *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users praise StreetComplete for its beginner-friendly, gamified UI that makes contributing to OpenStreetMap feel like a &amp;#34;wholesome&amp;#34; version of Pokémon Go &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817317&quot; title=&quot;I discovered that recently, it&amp;#39;s a very fun way to contribute to OpenStreetMap, and the UI is really well-done, it&amp;#39;s totally beginner friendly!  I wish there was a way to do more than labeling though, like add simple roads and footpaths&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817380&quot; title=&quot;I have used it one (1) time in my life, ans it was my first experience with OpenStreetMap in general. It was pretty fun! It&amp;#39;s very intuitive and makes you learn just how detailed and specific map data can be. Can&amp;#39;t say much about missing features since I don&amp;#39;t event know what can be done. Recommended experience, it&amp;#39;s like playing Pokemon Go without the evil part :)&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817664&quot; title=&quot;Probably https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/pokemon-go-players-unwitt...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some find the mobile-only experience intuitive, others criticize slow performance and the tedious nature of certain tasks like collecting phone numbers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818043&quot; title=&quot;The UX is really bad. POI loading is taking 10+ seconds to update, then any zoom or pan reorders the list of locations. Most of the missing info (around me) is just phone numbers and hours of operation, which are boring and should be trivial to collect automatically.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818265&quot; title=&quot;Does it have to be a mobile app? Id love to do this when im bored at work but i dont wanna make it seem like im just sitting on my phone.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights alternative tools like Every Door for placing points of interest and debates whether OSM should adopt stricter licensing to prevent companies like Google from using the data without reciprocating &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819287&quot; title=&quot;It sucks that Google is probably using OSM data to check what they are missing and adding it to their maps, but we can&amp;#39;t do vice versa. OSM should change their license to something like if you use our data, you have to make yours open as well.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817362&quot; title=&quot;Great app. There is also https://every-door.app/ that gives you slightly different set of tasks and allows you to place POI easily. I recently mapped a lot of trash cans and benches around my neighborhood while walking with my dog.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.heise.de/en/news/Showdown-in-Strasbourg-The-unexpected-return-of-Chat-Control-1-0-11356680.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chat Control passed first round in EU Parliament&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (heise.de)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819008&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;637 points · 259 comments · by miroljub&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The European Parliament has approved an urgency motion to vote on reinstating &amp;#34;Chat Control,&amp;#34; a controversial regulation allowing tech companies to voluntarily scan private messages for child abuse material, following a narrow majority vote and procedural maneuvers by proponents before the summer break. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.heise.de/en/news/Showdown-in-Strasbourg-The-unexpected-return-of-Chat-Control-1-0-11356680.html&quot; title=&quot;Showdown in Strasbourg: The unexpected return of Chat Control 1.0    With a procedural trick, proponents in the EU Parliament are pushing for reactivation of indiscriminate scans of chat messages shortly before the summer break.    [heise+ entdecken](https://www.heise.de/plus/abo?affiliateId=30165&amp;amp;wt_mc=intern.abo.plus.hp_ea_2025.ho_navilink.desktop.desktop)    Suchen[![heise Plus](/icons/svg/logos/svg/heise_plus_blue.svg)![heise Plus](/icons/svg/logos/svg/heise_plus_blue_negativ.svg)Abo](/plus…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The EU Parliament is moving toward extending &amp;#34;Chat Control 1.0,&amp;#34; a regulation allowing—but not yet mandating—service providers to scan private messages for illicit content &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819723&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; So, if I&amp;#39;m reading this correctly, Chat Control [2.0, implied] is bound to become law? Nope. This is bad, but not THAT bad. This is an extension of the existing Chat Control 1.0, which was set to expire (or maybe already has, I didn&amp;#39;t keep track). AIUI it gives chat companies permission to scan user chats for illicit content, but does not mandate it. This is bad, but it&amp;#39;s not the much worse still Chat Control 2.0 that was defeated several times already.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue the timing of the vote is a tactical maneuver to bypass opposition, as the second-reading rules and summer recess schedule make a rejection by the required absolute majority unlikely &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819151&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;The procedure now chosen gives the proponents of Chat Control a significant tactical advantage. Since the law is in its second reading, an absolute majority of 361 votes of all parliament members is required for amendments or a renewed rejection on Thursday. In contrast, a simple majority of the MEPs present is sufficient for the other side. As many parliamentarians have historically already departed by the last day before the summer break, the re-enactment of the regulation is considered…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819106&quot; title=&quot;From a post on Mastodon: &amp;gt; democracy is when you repeatedly push for unpopular laws until they pass, and the more times you do it the more democratic it is It is unlikely that 60 additional “no” votes can be found by Thursday to stop this.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48821227&quot; title=&quot;It’s the council. We have to be clear which institution we are talking about within the EU, otherwise that doesn’t make any sense. The European Parliament already pushed back that proposal. The EU is made of a lot of different actors with their own agenda. Here the council, with the help of the EPP party is doing that undemocratic maneuvering: They made it on purpose so that the parliament is unlikely to be able to push back a third time (all of that leaked a few days ago)&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users view this persistent pushing of unpopular laws as a failure of democratic accountability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819106&quot; title=&quot;From a post on Mastodon: &amp;gt; democracy is when you repeatedly push for unpopular laws until they pass, and the more times you do it the more democratic it is It is unlikely that 60 additional “no” votes can be found by Thursday to stop this.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819438&quot; title=&quot;The European Comission is the top decision maker of the EU. The European citizen has zero (0) influence on the members or actions of the EC. No different than the politburo in China.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48821208&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; how democratic of the EU. Really, it&amp;#39;s not the first time the EU pulls that kind of shite off. And summertime is the perfect time, in Europe everyone&amp;#39;s at the beach. They even managed to find a work around an actual referendum.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the outcome simply reflects the actions of elected representatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819535&quot; title=&quot;So basically the people we elected will vote yes. How&amp;#39;s that undemocratic? Because the majority doesn&amp;#39;t vote the way I like it? I&amp;#39;m not even ironic, I truly don&amp;#39;t understand those comments. You get what you voted for, garbage in garbage out.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt; or suggest that citizens must turn to steganography to maintain privacy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819358&quot; title=&quot;The cypherpunks were right. Rights to encryption are only a part of what we need. The other part is steganography, or hiding real messages within a innocuous anodyne message stream. And encryption can be used in conjunction as part of hiding said messages. It can be within pictures with the lowest bit values. It can be constructed punctuation and spaces. Lots of things. But hidden and plausibly deniable messaging is the ONLY way to defeat a government(s) that want to invade every communication…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://whynothugo.nl/journal/2026/07/03/98-isnt-very-much/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;98% isn&amp;#39;t much&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (whynothugo.nl)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48816959&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;525 points · 350 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that a 98% success rate is insufficient for web accessibility and engineering, as it still excludes millions of users and fails to meet the basic reliability standards required for robust design. &lt;a href=&quot;https://whynothugo.nl/journal/2026/07/03/98-isnt-very-much/&quot; title=&quot;Title: 98% isn&amp;#39;t very much    URL Source: https://whynothugo.nl/journal/2026/07/03/98-isnt-very-much/    Markdown Content:  2026-07-03[#accesibility](https://whynothugo.nl/tags/accesibility)[#design](https://whynothugo.nl/tags/design)[#society](https://whynothugo.nl/tags/society)  98% sounds like a lot. If someone wins the lottery 98% of the times they play, they are clearly blessed. Getting a top mark (e.g.: 10/10) on exams 98% of the time will likely lead to an honour diploma.    But a restaurant…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate centers on whether 98% browser support is a reasonable engineering goal or a failure to account for millions of users, with some arguing that supporting the &amp;#34;long tail&amp;#34; of configurations is often cost-prohibitive and technically complex &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817236&quot; title=&quot;Alternatively, 98% is plenty . If your business plan requires you to capitalize on more than 98% of the market, it&amp;#39;s already a failure.  It&amp;#39;ll never happen. As always, it&amp;#39;s an &amp;#39;it depends&amp;#39; situation.  If your userbase is largely luddites, then maybe you need to support 10+ year old browsers that can&amp;#39;t be updated.  Otherwise, you can probably just worry about people who are using computers new enough to actually update their browser once a year or better. The tradeoff is code complexity and…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818688&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, when I read the article I thought &amp;#39;Great, more paternalistic advice that pretends we have infinite resources/time/money.&amp;#39; Anyone who has ever done website or mobile development knows there is a huge array of browsers and platforms, and supporting the very long tail of configurations is sometimes nearly impossible, let alone almost never cost effective. When I last ran some web apps, we&amp;#39;d see substantial numbers of errors just due to f&amp;#39;d up (or sometimes outright malicious) browser…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817164&quot; title=&quot;I agree the general premise but do not agree when it comes to browser support. I feel like we should be building for the 98% or even 95% and force the remaining to upgrade their browsers. I&amp;#39;ve built for the IE6 - IE11 era for a painful and long time. I do not give a shit if you want to use a 3 year old browser at this point. Go look at a blank screen.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view users of ancient browsers as &amp;#34;luddites,&amp;#34; others point out that many are simply non-experts on older hardware or residents of smaller markets where services like SMS verification often fail due to profit-driven decisions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817328&quot; title=&quot;I like how you equate 10 year old browser users with luddites?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817281&quot; title=&quot;While I agree with the general sentiment, the problem here isn&amp;#39;t developers not being familiar with statistics, it&amp;#39;s the simple fact all of this is profit driven most of the time. I tried to purchase tickets for an event last week. I had to go through Ticketmaster as it was the only official way. They forced me to verify my account using a phone number, but whoever they were using for messages wasn&amp;#39;t able to deliver a code to my number. I tried a few numbers from our household and they all…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817500&quot; title=&quot;There are plenty of people with old android phones with no free disk space using ancient browsers. There are plenty of people still using windows 10 with updates turned off or wedged for whatever reason. These people just use the sites that work.   They aren&amp;#39;t computer experts, and might not even realise why half the internet doesn&amp;#39;t work - they just think that&amp;#39;s the way things are.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. This led to a broader disagreement over whether digital infrastructure should be regulated like public utilities to ensure universal access, or if market forces and new technologies will naturally fill those service gaps &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817433&quot; title=&quot;Infrastructure should not be (purely) profit driven. To improve profits for train operators, the simple option is to cut lines serving small and rural communities. The economics are much worse than serving large cities. Same for cell coverage and broadband internet. Most profitable is to just not cover a few percent of the population. There is a point where technology becomes foundational for participating in society. And then it needs to be regulated to be available to everyone.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817597&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; the simple option is to cut lines serving small and rural communities We don’t see this in practice to though. Three examples: 1. In the airline industry big airlines don’t go everywhere for this reasons but small local airlines fill the gap due to market opportunity. 2. Changes in technology enable big companies to operate more efficiently. See starlink. 3. Big companies know that ubiquity is important for their brand. In practice Amazon will deliver packages across the US.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, commenters emphasize that the &amp;#34;correct&amp;#34; percentage depends entirely on a company&amp;#39;s specific scale and resources &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817236&quot; title=&quot;Alternatively, 98% is plenty . If your business plan requires you to capitalize on more than 98% of the market, it&amp;#39;s already a failure.  It&amp;#39;ll never happen. As always, it&amp;#39;s an &amp;#39;it depends&amp;#39; situation.  If your userbase is largely luddites, then maybe you need to support 10+ year old browsers that can&amp;#39;t be updated.  Otherwise, you can probably just worry about people who are using computers new enough to actually update their browser once a year or better. The tradeoff is code complexity and…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818688&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, when I read the article I thought &amp;#39;Great, more paternalistic advice that pretends we have infinite resources/time/money.&amp;#39; Anyone who has ever done website or mobile development knows there is a huge array of browsers and platforms, and supporting the very long tail of configurations is sometimes nearly impossible, let alone almost never cost effective. When I last ran some web apps, we&amp;#39;d see substantial numbers of errors just due to f&amp;#39;d up (or sometimes outright malicious) browser…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818754&quot; title=&quot;He wasn’t actually giving a blanket directive. The article was suggesting that you think about whether 98% is actually good in your use case by doing the math and thinking.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c33y0n1v1xjo&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;China sentences official to death for taking $325M in bribes&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48820220&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;353 points · &lt;strong&gt;489 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by randycupertino&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Chinese court has sentenced former Nanjing official Yang Youlin to death for accepting over $325 million in bribes and committing other financial crimes over a 30-year period. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c33y0n1v1xjo&quot; title=&quot;Title: China official who received $325m worth of bribes sentenced to death    URL Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c33y0n1v1xjo    Published Time: 2026-07-07T03:36:56.648Z    Markdown Content:  ## China sentences official to death for taking $325m in bribes    1 day ago    Kelly Ng    ![Image 1: CCTV Yang Youlin appeared in court wearing a dark jacket standing between two uniformed police…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Chinese government’s use of the death penalty for white-collar crime is viewed by some as a &amp;#34;zero tolerance&amp;#34; policy for those who cause the state to lose face or prestige &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48821790&quot; title=&quot;The antifreeze toothpaste people didn’t get away with it, nor did the 3000 pigs in the river people, and nor did that one group of executives who were in charge of a fertilizer/chemical plant that was one of the largest industrial catastrophes in the world let alone China. If you get caught in China, Vietnam, or Singapore the penalties for white collar criminals is zero tolerance. You can’t buy your way out if you do something so spectacular that you cause the government to lose face. You might…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48821432&quot; title=&quot;Xi has shown repeatedly that he’s serious about corruption. As others have noted, some of the highest civilian and military officials have been removed for it. Some sentenced to death. He sees it as a challenge to his legitimacy and China’s power, which, as you’d expect are the most important things to him; even if you take the most cynical view. Another timely example, because it is the World Cup, is the Chinese football programs. They’ve been decimated because of corruption prosecutions, both…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue these prosecutions are often selective, serving as a tool for Xi Jinping to purge disloyal rivals or those who challenge his legitimacy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48820401&quot; title=&quot;I sometimes see people &amp;#39;celebrate&amp;#39; this, with the rationale that China is cracking down on white-collar crimes and handing out sentences unheard of in the west. But, are these sort of things just examples of selective prosecution? Would the inner circle members of CCP leadership realistically face the same prosecution and sentencing, if they were to be caught doing the same?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48821550&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;He sees it as a challenge to his legitimacy and China’s power This right here is why “corruption” should be looked on with great skepticism. In an authoritarian government basic liberties we take for granted in the West are considered corruption. You know, like having a say in how people are governed. This is a high crime in a state with 1 party that cannot be replaced. In that way, “corruption” can mean “not being loyal to the dictator.”&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48823916&quot; title=&quot;? Everyone in the party is incolved in similar crimes. The only thing they are guilty off in addition is a lack of loyalty to emperor xi. Incompetence and criminal corruption, that you can edit out of history, but intrigue is unforgivable.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters question the logic of continuing such high-level theft until caught &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48820376&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t really understand the mentality of people who do this sort of criminal activity. If he&amp;#39;d stopped after, say, $5m and just retired he&amp;#39;d probably have managed to get away with it. Continuing to such a ridiculous degree through sheer greed led him to a death sentence. That&amp;#39;s just plain stupid.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others note that Western nations also impose life sentences for major financial crimes, though without the same level of political theater &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48822957&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s also not like the West doesn&amp;#39;t impose extremely harsh punishments on the top financial crimes. You can go away for life if you steal enough money.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://30papers.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;30papers.com – Ilya&amp;#39;s 30 essential ML papers, in a beginner friendly format&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (30papers.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819608&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;648 points · 110 comments · by notmcrowley&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;30papers.com provides a curated, beginner-friendly collection of 27 essential machine learning papers based on a rumored reading list given by OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever to John Carmack. &lt;a href=&quot;https://30papers.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: 30 papers · The reading list Ilya Sutskever gave John Carmack    URL Source: https://30papers.com/    Markdown Content:  This website is based on a rumoured list of papers that Ilya Sutskever gave to John Carmack. We currently only have a list of 27. If you or anyone you know has the full, canonical list please [feel free to reach out](https://michaelcrowley.dev/).    [![Image 1: CS231n: Convolutional Neural Networks for Visual…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on a website created by a first-year CS student to host a list of 30 machine learning papers attributed to Ilya Sutskever &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819659&quot; title=&quot;Author here. First year CS student at Trinity College Dublin. I Built this because when I was getting into reading research papers I ended up burning a ton of my Claude usage asking questions other people have probably already asked. The website is just a side project and definitely a WIP. Happy to answer questions or take PRs on GitHub.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users criticized the site&amp;#39;s UX and questioned the authenticity of the source &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48822397&quot; title=&quot;Someone posts on X, &amp;#39;These are Ilya’s 30 papers&amp;#39;, gives no source, doesn&amp;#39;t say where he got it from, and isn&amp;#39;t connected to either Ilya or Carmack (Ilya gave him the list). Then someone vibe codes a barely usable website based on that, and it lands on the HN front page? Is this correct?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48821117&quot; title=&quot;I thought the actual 30 papers have never been disclosed. Do you have a source tying the recommendations back to Ilya, or did you come up with this list?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819774&quot; title=&quot;Main page UX is terrible. If you go for quirky, fine, but I would not want to use it.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others defended the project as a commendable effort by a student to share resources with the community &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48824428&quot; title=&quot;First year CS student excited to learn about a thing puts together a small website of academic papers, posts it to HN to share with others. Then someone makes a shitty comment. Is that correct?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Suggestions for improvement included adding personal annotations to the papers and providing a bulk download option &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48821460&quot; title=&quot;I think it&amp;#39;d be interesting to hear what you think the goal of the site is. Is it just rehosting the list, plus a reformatted copy of the papers? I was hoping you&amp;#39;d have at least annotated them with what you&amp;#39;d learned?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48821429&quot; title=&quot;Is there a way to download them all in one go?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3R0Lp86GEBk&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A better way to tie gym shorts (or any drawstring) [video]&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (youtube.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48816956&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;539 points · 185 comments · by surprisetalk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This tutorial demonstrates a secure drawstring knot based on the slipped Lapp knot, providing a reliable, easy-to-adjust, and quick-release alternative to the standard bow for gym shorts and sweatpants. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3R0Lp86GEBk&quot; title=&quot;Title: A better way to tie your gym shorts. (Or any drawstring)    URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3R0Lp86GEBk    Warning: Target URL returned error 403: Forbidden    Markdown Content:  Back [![Image 1](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3R0Lp86GEBk)](https://www.youtube.com/ &amp;#39;YouTube Home&amp;#39;)    Skip navigation     Search      Search with your voice     [](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3R0Lp86GEBk)    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users argue that life is too short to overcomplicate simple tasks like tying drawstrings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818401&quot; title=&quot;Life is too short to make simple things more complicated.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that a five-minute investment in a superior knot can save time in the long run &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818682&quot; title=&quot;You could also say life is too short to waste time retying inferior drawstrings.  If learning the knot takes 5 minutes, it seems like it could easily save you time overall.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Practical concerns were raised regarding the featured knot&amp;#39;s tendency to jam or tighten irreversibly &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818445&quot; title=&quot;I did this for a while after seeing that video, but after some of my shorts ended up tightening into a knot that I couldn&amp;#39;t get loose easily, I gave up on it. I instead just use the &amp;#39;Ian Knot&amp;#39; that I use to tie my shoes.  It&amp;#39;s very quick, I already use it all the time anyhow, and it rarely goes wrong.  (Sometimes, I think I end up with an end through a loop accidentally, and have to fix it.) Learning this extra knot didn&amp;#39;t really help much, and it definitely went wrong more than I liked.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, leading some to prefer the &amp;#34;Ian Knot&amp;#34; or traditional sailing knots like the bowline and clove hitch for their reliability and ease of release &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818445&quot; title=&quot;I did this for a while after seeing that video, but after some of my shorts ended up tightening into a knot that I couldn&amp;#39;t get loose easily, I gave up on it. I instead just use the &amp;#39;Ian Knot&amp;#39; that I use to tie my shoes.  It&amp;#39;s very quick, I already use it all the time anyhow, and it rarely goes wrong.  (Sometimes, I think I end up with an end through a loop accidentally, and have to fix it.) Learning this extra knot didn&amp;#39;t really help much, and it definitely went wrong more than I liked.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817710&quot; title=&quot;Depends what you&amp;#39;re doing. My favourite knot is the bowline. Non-slip loop, very strong, easy to tie, easy to undo. Can be used for tying two ropes together, ropes to things. Other useful ones (especially for sailing) * Clove hitch  * Reef knot  * Rolling hitch  * Sheet bend&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also touched on the &amp;#34;Ian Knot&amp;#39;s&amp;#34; origins, sparking a debate over whether the namesake truly invented it or simply popularized a pre-existing technique &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48822061&quot; title=&quot;A bit off topic, but I hate that Ian just slapped his name on a knot and people call it that. He even has a little link on there saying &amp;#39;Yes I&amp;#39;m the inventor,&amp;#39; which, if you click on it, amounts to &amp;#39;trust me bro.&amp;#39; That knot was how my father learned to tie his shoes in the 60s, so Ian must have time-traveled back after &amp;#39;inventing&amp;#39; it in &amp;#39;82.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48822389&quot; title=&quot;It never ceases to amaze me how reliably someone always appears to “well, actually” this issue whenever Ian comes up. Despite the fact that he has merely published all this info freely on the web for like 20+ years and never attempted to monopolize knot information, nor force anyone else to acknowledge him in any way. Like, if you want to, you could call it the “Ian Sucks” knot. Why care if he calls it ‘Ian Knot’? If you liked your hotdogs a certain way and you call that an “Arijun Dog,” should…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ariya.io/2026/03/local-cpu-friendly-high-quality-tts-text-to-speech-with-kokoro/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Local, CPU-Friendly, High-Quality TTS (Text-to-Speech) with Kokoro&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ariya.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48821576&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;514 points · 97 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kokoro is a lightweight, 82M-parameter text-to-speech model that enables high-quality, privacy-focused audio generation locally on a CPU, featuring multilingual support and compatibility with the OpenAI speech API. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ariya.io/2026/03/local-cpu-friendly-high-quality-tts-text-to-speech-with-kokoro/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Local, CPU-Friendly, High-Quality TTS (Text-to-Speech) with Kokoro    URL Source: https://ariya.io/2026/03/local-cpu-friendly-high-quality-tts-text-to-speech-with-kokoro/    Published Time: 2026-03-31T21:42:35-0700    Markdown Content:  ## Mar 31, 2026    [#tts](https://ariya.io/tags/tts/)[#privacy](https://ariya.io/tags/privacy/)    Just a few years ago, realistic local speech generation seemed unimaginable. Today, its quality is exceptional and, crucially, it delivers these results without…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users praise Kokoro for its high-quality, natural-sounding output and its ability to run efficiently on CPUs without requiring expensive GPUs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48823393&quot; title=&quot;I have used Kokoro fairly extensively for an accessibility product. I have loved working with it (especially because I don&amp;#39;t have an NVidia GPU like many TTS of similar quality require). I particularly appreciate the fact that it lets you manually add IPA pronunciation guides. There have been some cases where an important word is a homograph and Kokoro assumed the wrong pronunciation. The place where it falls a little short is in saying just a single word or two. Try having it say simply &amp;#39;six&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48824474&quot; title=&quot;I use kokoro with home assistant and its great. I find its the most natural sounding and small too. I speak over sonos speakers when certain events happen. And use it as my voice assistant.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48824873&quot; title=&quot;I just hooked it up to my personal AI Japanese Teacher app, pretty good quality / natural sounding speech in mixed English / Japanese while running fast on CPU so I don&amp;#39;t waste VRAM.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While it excels at long-form content like podcasts and accessibility tools, some note it struggles with single-word pronunciations, requiring creative workarounds like sentence cropping &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48826061&quot; title=&quot;I built a pipeline through hermes using edge-tts to automate and listen to links that I provide to it just this morning, google notebooklm style. I replaced the TTS model with Kokoro after seeing this post, thank you. Here&amp;#39;s the pipeline if anyone is interested. https://www.klaweht.com/2026-07-07-link-to-podcast-rss-pipel... By the way, it took hermes just around 10-15 minutes to build first iteration. I am impressed.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48823393&quot; title=&quot;I have used Kokoro fairly extensively for an accessibility product. I have loved working with it (especially because I don&amp;#39;t have an NVidia GPU like many TTS of similar quality require). I particularly appreciate the fact that it lets you manually add IPA pronunciation guides. There have been some cases where an important word is a homograph and Kokoro assumed the wrong pronunciation. The place where it falls a little short is in saying just a single word or two. Try having it say simply &amp;#39;six&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also highlights alternative local solutions like pocket-tts and voiceio, alongside a desire for better macOS integration to replace outdated system voices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48825083&quot; title=&quot;Who is going to hack together a mac widget that allows us to select text anywhere, press a shortcut key and finally get a non robotic voice outputted in a reasonable amount of time? I am aware of the Option + Esc shortcut on osx for the onboard TTS but wow is it hard to listen to in 2026.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48822329&quot; title=&quot;kokoro is decent but pocket-tts is much better especially when you rip a good voice. https://github.com/kyutai-labs/pocket-tts the onnx version of pocket-tts does perform better. https://huggingface.co/KevinAHM/pocket-tts-onnx&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48825023&quot; title=&quot;Super cool!! I&amp;#39;ve been using my own solution since January. I&amp;#39;m on Linux, and can&amp;#39;t use Aqua, Whipsrflow etc... So i made my own. Recently cleaned it up and made it install friendly. If anyone is interested, you can check it out here: https://github.com/Hugo0/voiceio It&amp;#39;s self-improving over time, runs on your local machine, and is generally decent software. 60% of my interaction with my PC nowadays is pure voice input.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48825142&quot; title=&quot;In System Settings, if you go to Accessibility and click &amp;#39;Read &amp;amp; Speak&amp;#39; in the &amp;#39;Vision&amp;#39; section, you can select a different voice using the &amp;#39;System voice&amp;#39; section. Click the &amp;#39;(i)&amp;#39; to preview your various options and even download more. Some, like &amp;#39;Allison (Enhanced),&amp;#39; sound leagues better than the default voice.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://knockoff.shopping/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Amazon without the knockoffs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (knockoff.shopping)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818963&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;332 points · 264 comments · by plurby&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Knockoff is a free browser extension that filters Amazon search results to remove &amp;#34;pseudo-brands&amp;#34; and trademark-squatting listings, leaving only established brands with reputable names. &lt;a href=&quot;https://knockoff.shopping/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Knockoff: Amazon, without the knockoffs    URL Source: https://knockoff.shopping/    Markdown Content:  Knockoff filters the trademark-squat pseudo-brands (the SZHLUXes and HORUSDYs) out of your search results, so what&amp;#39;s left is brands with a reputation to lose.    [Add to Chrome](https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/pjgickchbiikhdfpmecaabkphmofpdce)[Star on GitHub](https://github.com/Shpigford/knockoff)    Free, fair source (FSL), no accounts, no tracking. Works on every Amazon…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the ethics and utility of filtering Amazon for &amp;#34;knockoffs,&amp;#34; with the original developer of the underlying brand list expressing frustration that this new extension is &amp;#34;ripping&amp;#34; their data without contributing to its maintenance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48821087&quot; title=&quot;This says it&amp;#39;s using AmazonBrandFilter&amp;#39;s list of brands. Why would we use/support this chrome extension instead of the upstream one [1] which is actually doing the important maintanance task? &amp;#39;Knockoff&amp;#39; seems to be literally describing itself. [1] https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/amazonbrandfilter/m...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48821976&quot; title=&quot;AmazonBrandFilter dev here. Yeah.  I don&amp;#39;t know.  I don&amp;#39;t love that they&amp;#39;re just ripping the list like that, I wouldn&amp;#39;t mind as much if they at least helped contribute to the list.  That is far and away the hardest part of this thing. But it is what it is, I&amp;#39;ll be more peeved if they monetize it (which I&amp;#39;m unsure if they&amp;#39;re doing). Maybe I should put one of those buy me a coffee links on the repo, I&amp;#39;d probably be better about focusing on it then.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that generic brands are a financial necessity in an inflationary economy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48820386&quot; title=&quot;Reality: A few years ago this would have been relevant. Most people can only afford the knockoffs now. My Chipotle meal cost $17 yesterday. It used to cost $8. The $9 difference is going to come out of my budget to buy authentic brands and buy local stuff. If you don&amp;#39;t like it, make my Chipotle meal $8 again or double my salary, reduce my taxes, and don&amp;#39;t pull random geopolitical shit that crashes the S&amp;amp;P500 every other weekend, and then we&amp;#39;ll talk.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that many &amp;#34;knockoffs&amp;#34; are actually identical products from the same suppliers as big brands &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48820526&quot; title=&quot;Cuts two ways. Why should I pay $200 for a BigBrand dog bed if this knockoff site shows SHRDLU has the same thing for $40? We all know that BigBrand gets it from the same supplier. The real knockoff problem I see is that you buy what you think is BigBrand and get shipped Knockoff because someone is mingling inventory.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48821369&quot; title=&quot;I should check my purchase history, but I probably use Amazon more for buying stuff that they would classify as a &amp;#39;Knockoff&amp;#39;, but isn&amp;#39;t (i.e. there is no established brand they are knocking off). Because for legitimate brands, I try to simply buy elsewhere. This is an example: https://www.amazon.com/MiiKARE-Universal-Rotating-Adjustable... You&amp;#39;ll find lots of different manufacturers selling this on Amazon, but there is no well known brand that makes these.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Alternative suggestions include buying direct from manufacturers or local stores &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48820624&quot; title=&quot;Even better, buy direct from the manufacturer instead of Amazon. I&amp;#39;ve found most of the time you get the same price and free shipping without giving Jeff Bezos a dime.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48821551&quot; title=&quot;Why not go down to your local independent pet store, keep your money local and support your neighbours instead of giving it to directors and shareholders sitting on beaches in French Polynesia?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, though some participants find the convenience and shipping speed of Amazon&amp;#39;s ecosystem worth the trade-off &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48820793&quot; title=&quot;Every time I do that I get frustrated: - shipping sometimes goes to from day(s) to weeks - suddenly their ads start going to email - please review us emails I&amp;#39;d rather bezos get his cut.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nwo.nl/nieuws/eerste-internationale-wetenschappers-via-het-tulp-fonds-naar-nederland&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Top researchers leave USA for the Netherlands (in Dutch)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nwo.nl)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48816003&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;320 points · 260 comments · by 28304283409234&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Dutch Tulp Fund has awarded grants to 34 elite international researchers, primarily from prestigious U.S. institutions, to relocate their work to the Netherlands to strengthen national innovation in fields like AI, health, and energy while protecting academic freedom. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nwo.nl/nieuws/eerste-internationale-wetenschappers-via-het-tulp-fonds-naar-nederland&quot; title=&quot;Title: Eerste internationale wetenschappers via het Tulp Fonds naar Nederland | NWO    URL Source: https://www.nwo.nl/nieuws/eerste-internationale-wetenschappers-via-het-tulp-fonds-naar-nederland    Markdown Content:  1.   [Home](https://www.nwo.nl/)  2.   [Nieuws](https://www.nwo.nl/nieuws)  3.    Eerste internationale wetenschappers via het Tulp Fonds naar Nederland     *   7 juli 2026    Shutterstock![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters liken the departure of top researchers from the US to a &amp;#34;reverse Operation Paperclip,&amp;#34; though there is significant debate over whether Europe or China is better positioned to benefit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48816497&quot; title=&quot;The US is accidentally conducting Operation Paperclip but in reverse. Who will benefit the most from it, China or Europe ?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48816631&quot; title=&quot;China is not very immigration friendly to non-han folks, but I guess chinese researchers won&amp;#39;t make it to the US and this already will have a great effect on the chinese economy. Europe is in its own set of problems and it is not in the same situation that US used to be after WW2 (only major economy not affected by bombing). Europe&amp;#39;s problems: * active major war in Ukraine (lasting longer than Axis/Soviet war in WW2) * energy supply issues (unlike US it&amp;#39;s not energy sufficient and the places…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue China’s restrictive immigration policies and lack of dual citizenship hinder its appeal to non-Han researchers, others point to high-profile recruitments, such as Nobel Laureates, as evidence of its growing draw &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48816631&quot; title=&quot;China is not very immigration friendly to non-han folks, but I guess chinese researchers won&amp;#39;t make it to the US and this already will have a great effect on the chinese economy. Europe is in its own set of problems and it is not in the same situation that US used to be after WW2 (only major economy not affected by bombing). Europe&amp;#39;s problems: * active major war in Ukraine (lasting longer than Axis/Soviet war in WW2) * energy supply issues (unlike US it&amp;#39;s not energy sufficient and the places…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48816842&quot; title=&quot;Whether China is immigration friendly or not is debatable. However, here&amp;#39;s a recent announcement from last week: Nobel Laureate in Chemistry Omar M. Yaghi joins Tsinghua University full-time https://www.tsinghua.edu.cn/en/info/1244/14984.htm&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817266&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Whether China is immigration friendly or not is debatable. Compared to the US or Europe? No it&amp;#39;s not debatable. No dual citizenship at all, most probably no citizenship. Harder residency. Good luck bringing family there. Not going to even mention the obscene difference in racism OR the language barrier, both of which are enormous factors.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Meanwhile, Europe faces its own structural challenges, including an aging population, energy insecurity, and a lack of climate-ready infrastructure like air conditioning, which some attribute to architectural hurdles like European window designs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48816631&quot; title=&quot;China is not very immigration friendly to non-han folks, but I guess chinese researchers won&amp;#39;t make it to the US and this already will have a great effect on the chinese economy. Europe is in its own set of problems and it is not in the same situation that US used to be after WW2 (only major economy not affected by bombing). Europe&amp;#39;s problems: * active major war in Ukraine (lasting longer than Axis/Soviet war in WW2) * energy supply issues (unlike US it&amp;#39;s not energy sufficient and the places…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817006&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Europe&amp;#39;s problems: [...] Would it be silly to add &amp;#39;general lack of air conditioning&amp;#39; to that list? I imagine at some point it inevitably stops being a joke and starts being a real problem. Have we reached that point yet? [1] [2] [1] https://www.carbonbrief.org/guest-post-frances-june-heatwave... [2] https://www.dw.com/en/heat-wave-european-countries-report-37...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817728&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;It&amp;#39;s not hard to install AC in Europe Its orders of magnitude harder. When I lived in the USA, I could just pick up a $200 window unit and have it installed within minutes. Every single person had air conditioning. Now I live in Finland where the windows are the worst designed windows I&amp;#39;ve ever seen. They are thin, tall windows that open vertically on hinges like doors. So rain gets in, and its impossible to install a window AC or even a box fan. You&amp;#39;re forced to either install a mini split…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, some skeptics view these specific moves less as a systemic shift and more as the Netherlands using financial incentives to &amp;#34;bribe&amp;#34; talent away &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48816585&quot; title=&quot;This reads more like The Netherlands hopes to bribe US researchers into moving to the Netherlands.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.euronews.com/culture/2026/06/29/dua-lipa-opens-library-for-banned-and-censored-books-in-portugal&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Dua Lipa opens library for banned and censored books in Portugal&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (euronews.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817017&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;306 points · 257 comments · by pax&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Singer Dua Lipa has opened the Manifesto Library in Porto, Portugal, a permanent collection within Livraria Lello dedicated to banned and censored books. The library features nearly 100 works that challenge power and dominant narratives, including titles by Margaret Atwood and Salman Rushdie. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.euronews.com/culture/2026/06/29/dua-lipa-opens-library-for-banned-and-censored-books-in-portugal&quot; title=&quot;Dua Lipa opens library for banned and censored books in Portugal    The Manifesto Library is located inside Livraria Lello in Porto, and is dedicated to books “that challenge power, censorship, exclusion, and dominant narratives.”    * [Go to navigation](#enw-navigation-bar)  * [Go to main content](#enw-main-content)  * [Go to search](#search-autocomplete)  * [Go to footer](#enw-site-footer)    [ ]    English    *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the semantic shift of &amp;#34;banned books&amp;#34; from state-level censorship to a marketing tool and &amp;#34;pop culture meme&amp;#34; used to describe local school library removals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818745&quot; title=&quot;Whenever the topic of “banned books” comes up, a bunch of people argue about whether they should be called “banned”. What I haven’t seen mentioned in these discussions is where the mental association of “banned books” comes from. In America, at least, the school curriculum spends a lot of time talking about dictators. It mentions, numerous times over many years of a child’s life, that something dictators often do is to ban books that could make people question them or that could make people…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818949&quot; title=&quot;The “banned books” theme has become intentionally vague because it has become a marketing tool. That’s how we got to Dua Lipa doing a promotional photo op holding up books that can be purchased on Amazon and delivered to your Kindle to read immediately. Attaching the “banned” word to a book turns the purchase into an act of rebellion and a reason to talk about it, and the marketers are not going to waste that opportunity. That’s why the “banned books” category has been expanded so much to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817520&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; A quick check here in the States showed all of them available on Amazon for under $25 each. The term “banned books” has become a pop culture meme. In this context it doesn’t literally mean banned, it means the book wasn’t allowed somewhere. In extreme cases a government in a controlling country may have forbidden the book. However in a lot of cases the “banned books” were just not allowed in some school’s library for kids somewhere. That’s why all of the books aren’t actually banned in the US…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that labeling these removals as &amp;#34;bans&amp;#34; leverages psychological associations with dictatorships to create a false sense of authoritarianism, noting that the books remain widely available on platforms like Amazon &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818745&quot; title=&quot;Whenever the topic of “banned books” comes up, a bunch of people argue about whether they should be called “banned”. What I haven’t seen mentioned in these discussions is where the mental association of “banned books” comes from. In America, at least, the school curriculum spends a lot of time talking about dictators. It mentions, numerous times over many years of a child’s life, that something dictators often do is to ban books that could make people question them or that could make people…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817297&quot; title=&quot;Are those just banned and censored in Portugal specifically or the EU as a whole? A quick check here in the States showed all of them available on Amazon for under $25 each.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817385&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;libraries and educators to forgo specific books&amp;#39; is neither &amp;#39;banning&amp;#39; nor &amp;#39;censoring&amp;#39; In the name of literacy, we need to use words properly.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817427&quot; title=&quot;Lists of banned books are often quite disappointing, and I think they fall into a few categories: - Books that are simply bad books and in addition to being bad take an aggressive, political bent. (eg: the handmaid&amp;#39;s tale) - Books that seem relatively anodyne, and it&amp;#39;s not clear why they were banned. (eg: the perks of being a wallflower) - Books that governments might have feared in the old days, but are now much less threatening than other more readily-available material. (eg: 1984) I still…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some participants contend that removing books from schools is a form of local authoritarianism that effectively restricts access for vulnerable populations, regardless of national legality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819141&quot; title=&quot;Banning a book in a school district still signifies a form of authoritarianism. If someone is prevented from reading Maus[0] (or finding out they are in a cult, or a victim of domestic abuse), what is the effective difference to them between an authoritarian censoring it at the national level or the local one? [0]: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/arts/holocaust-novel-maus-banne...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817314&quot; title=&quot;No non of them are censored in the EU. They are all censored in the US, maybe with the exception of Salman Rushdie. US book banning is mainly schools and parent groups strong arming libraries and educators to forgo specific books.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, many view the library project as a &amp;#34;promotional stunt&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;slacktivism&amp;#34; because the featured books are not actually censored in Portugal or the EU &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818949&quot; title=&quot;The “banned books” theme has become intentionally vague because it has become a marketing tool. That’s how we got to Dua Lipa doing a promotional photo op holding up books that can be purchased on Amazon and delivered to your Kindle to read immediately. Attaching the “banned” word to a book turns the purchase into an act of rebellion and a reason to talk about it, and the marketers are not going to waste that opportunity. That’s why the “banned books” category has been expanded so much to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819328&quot; title=&quot;We &amp;#39;ban&amp;#39; things from school kids all the time, though: Pornography, gambling, smoking, alcohol, R-rated movies. Dua Lipa wasn&amp;#39;t doing a photo op with Maus . In the photos she&amp;#39;s posing with modern books that are still being promoted by their publishers. I&amp;#39;m not familiar with all of them, but a quick search shows one of them is not appropriate for elementary schools because it includes essays debating which sexual acts are appropriate for feminists to perform and other adult topics. Why is it…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817438&quot; title=&quot;They are not banned in portugal. Appreciate the gesture but it s very inconsequential.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://odra.dev/slopfix/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;We charge $10k a week to delete AI-generated code&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (odra.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48823359&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;302 points · 239 comments · by zie1ony&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Slopfix offers a $10,000 one-week service where senior engineers refactor and condense bloated, AI-generated codebases to improve maintainability, with pricing tied to the percentage of code reduction achieved. &lt;a href=&quot;https://odra.dev/slopfix/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Slopfix — we refactor vibecoded codebases    URL Source: https://odra.dev/slopfix/    Published Time: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 20:37:23 GMT    Markdown Content:  ## Did that happen to you?    You have an AI-generated codebase that works, but adding a feature now takes days and breaks two other things? This happens to every vibecoded project past a certain size: the agent stops seeing the whole picture and starts duplicating code instead of finding it. We can help.    ## What we do?    **We analyze your…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of &amp;#34;vibe coding&amp;#34; has enabled teams to rapidly replace expensive low-code platforms with AI-generated workflows, shifting the engineer&amp;#39;s role from manual coding to high-level system design and feature planning &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48826120&quot; title=&quot;We replaced a 120,000 USD/year low-code/no-code platform that was running a lot of workflows. And we have another platform that is also similar that we are on track to replace by EOY. Both have been replaced by &amp;#39;vibe&amp;#39; coding. It works well. Everyone&amp;#39;s happy. People are having fun with it. We get feature requests, improvements, ideas, feedback. JIRA tickets get created, and we ask AI to reference that ticket, code to it, and create a PR. We have senior engineers review the actual functionality…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48826517&quot; title=&quot;You know, that question should trouble us more. But honestly we&amp;#39;ve all asked ourselves that same question and I think our collective response is too nuanced to try to type properly but I&amp;#39;ll try. Tools are always made out to seem like the human could be replaced. We&amp;#39;ve seen that every time some new technology comes out that some people claim will replace humans once and for all! But this does not seem to be true. What AI coding allows us to do is get rid of just 1 or 2 parts of the job: coding…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48826229&quot; title=&quot;My guess is design (features/functionality, not code). When you don&amp;#39;t have to write every line of code and you can quickly iterate on features, you have a lot of freedom to dial in what you really want out of an app.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. However, this trend has birthed a new niche for &amp;#34;slop-fixing&amp;#34; services that charge high fees to refactor and delete the resulting &amp;#34;AI-generated spaghetti&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48823360&quot; title=&quot;Creator here, There is a new kind of task for software engineers these days. A client calls, asks for a &amp;#39;small refactor,&amp;#39; and sends you 100k lines of AI-generated spaghetti. And this is great! This is something we can work with. Any experienced engineer can look at a codebase like that and quickly see what to refactor, where a library replaces a few thousand hand-rolled lines, and what smells bad. Removing the first 30% is easy. The next 30% is harder, and that is exactly what the price should…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48826068&quot; title=&quot;I guess it was only a matter of time before this niche of business developed. AI is an imprecise &amp;#39;programming&amp;#39; language, full of ambiguity (English) trying to produce precise relationships between different concepts. It certainly works great on small scale, building block type of things, but the more a project grows in complexity, components, interfacing with other heterogenous systems in other languages or APIs, understanding wtf is going on top to bottom.... it fails miserably. Reminds me of…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that AI produces cleaner code when used with modular design principles, others remain skeptical of the lack of technical specifics in success stories and warn that using AI to fix AI-induced errors is akin to &amp;#34;lossy transcoding&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48825761&quot; title=&quot;“We use Claude Code too” I understand that it’s probably impossible to sell non-AI-assisted solutions to AI-pilled companies (even when their headaches are AI-induced), but my gut reaction to “take an AI-inflated codebase and apply AI deflation to it” is something like “that’s akin to applying two rounds of lossy transcoding; the errors don’t cancel out, they cross-multiply”.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48826121&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I guess it was only a matter of time before this niche of business developed. This is a fun webpage, and it feeds a certain bias, but there really isn&amp;#39;t a &amp;#39;niche&amp;#39; beyond getting people to upvote it for the lulz. I would be extremely surprised if they find a single paying customer. And to be fair, lots of grifters have done the fake it till you make it act on HN, so someone saying &amp;#39;Oh I&amp;#39;m totally going to give them my corps code&amp;#39; convince no one. &amp;gt;It certainly works great on small scale ....…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48825734&quot; title=&quot;lol looks like they are using a similar methodology to how we use Claude in house. Honestly, the code we write with AI is cleaner, better documented, better factored, more maintainable, and less bugs than back in old days before code assistant agents.  I think people must be just yoloing it, because it seems a lot like a holding it wrong type problem. Documentation driven development is your friend.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48826539&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s really quite interesting how there are always posts on HN with people talking about how AI made their life great, did it cheaply, made a great product, and saved the day. But whenever someone asks for specifics, the questions are always dodged or answered very vaguely. It&amp;#39;s rare that anyone ever even says what their product does.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bradleywoolf.com/links-1/sequencing-my-own-dna-at-home&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How to sequence your own DNA at home&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bradleywoolf.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48812156&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;381 points · 158 comments · by bilsbie&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bradley Woolf provides a detailed technical guide on sequencing a human genome at home using the Oxford Nanopore MinION, covering everything from cheek swab collection and lab hardware requirements to bioinformatics analysis for identifying genetic variants and drug metabolism traits. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bradleywoolf.com/links-1/sequencing-my-own-dna-at-home&quot; title=&quot;How to sequence your own DNA at home    I have now sequenced my own genome 5 times with an Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION. This means collecting them from a swab, prepping them for sequencing, running them through a sequencer, then doing analysis over them.    [![Bradley Woolf](https://images.spr.so/cdn-cgi/imagedelivery/j42No7y-dcokJuNgXeA0ig/a3e54c2d-5256-4028-b20e-eaf9c2ebc404/Screenshot_2025-10-03_at_9.21.54_AM/w=1920,quality=90,fit=scale-down)    Bradley Woolf](/)/[Links…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a growing interest in accessible DNA sequencing, with users seeking third-party services that provide raw data while expressing significant concerns over permanent privacy risks and data leaks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48814678&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t want to sequence at home. But I do want to sequence it using a third-party that gives me all the raw data. I live in Europe and I&amp;#39;m just a simple consumer. Does anyone know how I can do this? What service would I use / you can recommend? Them not keeping it on their side would be a huge bonus of course but not sure I can ask for that much.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48814833&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; But I do want to sequence it using a third-party Don&amp;#39;t forget to change your DNA when the third party&amp;#39;s database will eventually leak. (see the 21andMe&amp;#39;s data leak: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/23andMe_data_leak )&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view home sequencing as a commodified hobby or a &amp;#34;future-is-now&amp;#34; milestone, others propose practical niche applications like identifying invasive plant roots in plumbing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48813264&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve bee thinking about starting a company where I fish roots out of your sewer and identify the plant (by sequence if necessary) that you have to kill so your sewer doesn&amp;#39;t collapse as soon as it otherwise would. $100 to stave off that $10000 sewer replacement for a few years would be worth it to a lot of people&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48812515&quot; title=&quot;I am very impressed with the, why wait? just do it now approach to the future.   which while not here, IS there.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48812622&quot; title=&quot;Nothing about this is the future.  Sequencing at home will not solve any major problems.  It&amp;#39;s mainly a fun exercise to demonstrate that sequencing has been commodified.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. However, there is notable pushback against the guide&amp;#39;s reliance on AI for instruction and fears regarding genetic discrimination if data is compromised &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48812919&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This is intended to be read by AI- please just copy and paste the URL of this and have ChatGPT walk you through it. If you have AR glasses, even better, since the AI can walk you through the whole protocol. What kind of magic is going on here, am I missing something?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817999&quot; title=&quot;Finding yourself in a genetically-determined out group, and being treated differently / discriminated against because of it.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48812491&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This is intended to be read by AI Fuck this&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pcmag.com/news/a-hackers-arrest-reveals-microsoft-can-track-users-via-a-windows-device&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft Can Track Users via a Windows Device ID&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (pcmag.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48815196&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;354 points · 162 comments · by ifh-hn&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FBI used a persistent Microsoft &amp;#34;Global Device ID&amp;#34; to track and arrest a suspected hacker, revealing Windows&amp;#39; ability to link unique OS installations to specific online activities even when a VPN is used. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pcmag.com/news/a-hackers-arrest-reveals-microsoft-can-track-users-via-a-windows-device&quot; title=&quot;Title: A Hacker&amp;#39;s Arrest Reveals Microsoft Can Track Users Via a Windows Device ID    URL Source: https://www.pcmag.com/news/a-hackers-arrest-reveals-microsoft-can-track-users-via-a-windows-device    Published Time: 2026-07-06T16:58:47+00:00    Markdown Content:  [Skip to Main Content](https://www.pcmag.com/news/a-hackers-arrest-reveals-microsoft-can-track-users-via-a-windows-device#main &amp;#39;Skip to Main Content&amp;#39;)    - [x] Menu   *   ![Image 6: Maggie AI Logo](https://www.pcmag.com/icons/maggie-logo.svg)…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While users express frustration with Microsoft’s persistent tracking and corporate culture &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48815684&quot; title=&quot;Well they can’t use that to track users of Linux. I was a big fan of Microsoft ten to fifteen years ago. I’ve since transitioned my whole family off Microsoft products now over to Linux, Apple, and proton. Edit: and Brave. I really thought their corporate culture would’ve changed after the late 90’s but I guess this is a good lesson for founders. The culture you build into your company will likely outlast your tenure.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48816032&quot; title=&quot;US Tech is fast becoming like Russia&amp;#39;s and China&amp;#39;s.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that similar unique identifiers, such as `machine-id`, exist across modern operating systems including Linux &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48815777&quot; title=&quot;Both systemd and dbus have a similar device id for Linux, which e.g. Chrome reads at startup: https://manpages.debian.org/trixie/systemd/machine-id.5.en.h... https://manpages.debian.org/trixie/dbus-bin/dbus-uuidgen.1.e...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817038&quot; title=&quot;The interesting part is not really the existence of a machine identifier. Almost every modern OS has some equivalent. The bigger question is the boundary: which components can access it, and when does a local identifier become a remote tracking identifier? A machine-id sitting on disk is very different from an OS vendor correlating it with network activity.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. The core debate centers on the lack of transparency regarding how these IDs are correlated with network activity, with some speculating that Microsoft telemetry or third-party tools like ngrok may be injecting or reporting these identifiers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48815315&quot; title=&quot;TLDR: Microsoft can (at least) correlate your Windows installation to all website domains you visit while using Windows. It&amp;#39;s unclear what the mechanism is, but I&amp;#39;d wager their &amp;#39;telemetry&amp;#39; is constantly revealing your installation ID, your current IP, and domains that were recently resolved.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819487&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, this is what&amp;#39;s glaringly missing from the article. Exactly how does Microsoft&amp;#39;s device identifier get associated with the ngrok session (normally initiated via its closed-source CLI)? I can&amp;#39;t tell from the article whether Microsoft is doing something underhanded to inject its device identifiers into network traffic, or whether the ngrok client software (again, closed-source!) grabbed the device identifier… and might well do the same on any other OS, using /etc/machine-id on Linux for…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818214&quot; title=&quot;This is the part that isn&amp;#39;t clear and is by far the most interesting. At what stage and what point did the GDID get correlated with a tool/web request. As is it almost sounds like Microsoft &amp;#39;telemetry&amp;#39; gathers everything and they did a bulk search for certain activity, pulling the GDID and correlating it with a user.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest rotating or deleting IDs to maintain privacy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48815852&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t like the idea of a persistent id for my machine. Would there be any harm in rewriting the machine-id at every boot? Or just deleting it as part of the shutdown sequence?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that unique hardware fingerprinting makes total anonymity nearly impossible against motivated adversaries &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48816134&quot; title=&quot;Whatever you do there will always be uniquely identifiable information (if not an id, a fingerprint) on your machine. If you want to escape that, you have to use dedicated privacy-enhancing tools / browsers, but even then, it&amp;#39;s very likely that you can still be identified by motivated adversaries. It doesn&amp;#39;t mean you have to give up, but, if such id is necessary for technical reasons in systemd (I guess it is), I wouldn&amp;#39;t worry too much.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://davit.app&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Davit, a Apple Containers UI&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (davit.app)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48821848&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;388 points · 101 comments · by xinit&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Davit is an open-source, community-developed graphical user interface designed for managing Apple Containers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://davit.app&quot; title=&quot;Mostly vibe-coded Apple Containers front-end that I&amp;amp;#x27;d like to use myself. But if others want to use it, here&amp;amp;#x27;s the source code.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Davit is a lightweight, notarized Swift application for managing Apple Containers, notable for being &amp;#34;vibe-coded&amp;#34; using Claude &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48823028&quot; title=&quot;This looks like a really solid app. I like that it&amp;#39;s 17 MB and uses the ContainerAPIClient library directly. 28 commits in 3 days, 5,015 lines of Swift, every commit &amp;#39;Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5&amp;#39;. Also neat that it&amp;#39;s signed/notarized. I installed it and it downloaded the necessary container platform stuff on first launch. Suggestion: add a getting started tutorial to the site which suggests an image to try out and has screenshots (or a silent video) showing you how to get that image up and…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48824693&quot; title=&quot;The AI-Maxing copy on the website kind of gave it away. Doesn&amp;#39;t mean is not a great app though!&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While users appreciate its small 17MB distribution size and direct use of the ContainerAPIClient, some questioned the long-term maintainability of AI-generated projects and how it compares to established tools like OrbStack &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48823028&quot; title=&quot;This looks like a really solid app. I like that it&amp;#39;s 17 MB and uses the ContainerAPIClient library directly. 28 commits in 3 days, 5,015 lines of Swift, every commit &amp;#39;Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5&amp;#39;. Also neat that it&amp;#39;s signed/notarized. I installed it and it downloaded the necessary container platform stuff on first launch. Suggestion: add a getting started tutorial to the site which suggests an image to try out and has screenshots (or a silent video) showing you how to get that image up and…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48825232&quot; title=&quot;Hmm… how does one even pick between multiple vibe coded options? I like to vet my options before committing to new software but who knows if the authors are gonna support these in a month? I don’t want to waste Fable tokens to fix bugs myself when they crop up.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48823048&quot; title=&quot;How does it compare to something like OrbStack?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlighted similar recent AI-assisted container UIs and debated whether the high compression ratio of the binary is standard for macOS applications &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48822899&quot; title=&quot;Other recent vibe-coded projects providing similar interfaces: - https://github.com/tdeverx/contained-app - https://github.com/tofa84/berth&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48825453&quot; title=&quot;Kinda interestingly: it zips to 17MB, but the binary looks to be 56MB (davit.app/contents/macos/davit).  That seems like a surprising amount of compression for a binary - embedded assets maybe?  Possibly this is normal for mac apps though?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48825932&quot; title=&quot;A lot of Mac apps compress like this. Not so long ago, it was pretty common to download a 3-400mb dmg file that decompresses to a 1.5gb app package, for example.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-26-108193&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GAO: DOE Is Prematurely Excluding Less Expensive Options for Nuclear Cleanup&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (gao.gov)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48824826&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;277 points · 177 comments · by Jimmc414&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The GAO found that the Department of Energy is prematurely selecting specific cleanup solutions for large nuclear waste projects, often ignoring less expensive alternatives due to regulatory constraints and a lack of independent expert oversight during the planning stages. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-26-108193&quot; title=&quot;Title: U.S. GAO - Nuclear Waste Cleanup: Changes Needed to Ensure DOE Is Not Prematurely Excluding Less Expensive Options for Large Projects    URL Source: https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-26-108193    Markdown Content:  ## Fast Facts    To clean up nuclear waste, the Department of Energy spends billions of taxpayer dollars on large projects, like waste treatment facilities.    When planning these projects, DOE should identify a need without having a particular solution already in mind. This allows for…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The GAO report highlights that the Department of Energy is prematurely selecting expensive nuclear cleanup methods without properly considering cheaper alternatives, a move that could waste billions of dollars &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48825718&quot; title=&quot;Ouch. Two billion dollars. That could have been put into much better use, imagine being able to fund the Iran war for one more day.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48825894&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; now &amp;#39;doge&amp;#39; (GAO) GAO is not DOGE. For those who don&amp;#39;t know the difference between the two, confusing them is about like confusing the President with the Senate. GAO is a Congressional agency, it does not fall under the Executive. Its purpose is in its name, and it does a pretty good job of it. It also cannot, on its own (unlike how DOGE was empowered) effect any change. They can only conduct studies and make recommendations, it&amp;#39;s up to Congress and the relevant Executive branch agencies to…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that long-term containment of nuclear waste is technically unproven and prone to failure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48826350&quot; title=&quot;Sure, but has anyone ever built a container that lasts 30k years, and remains watertight? Thus far, most off-site containment storage sites over 10 years old have failed to stop containment leaks, Radon gas diffusion, or hot-material fires.   Fission reactors are a 1950&amp;#39;s loss-leader technology, and only make sense for already uninhabitable areas like space. =3&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48826457&quot; title=&quot;We&amp;#39;ve already leached too much uranium into the groundwater for many to drink just from the mining alone.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others point to the successful use of fission in military applications and the potential for stable storage in arid regions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48826408&quot; title=&quot;There are plenty of dry areas like in the American Southwest which can be projected to not have meaningful water attempt ingress in that time frame. Also, fission reactors make phenomenal sense on aircraft carriers, submarines, etc.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also touches on the broader economic logic of government spending and taxation, debating whether large-scale capital reallocations—such as wealth taxes or infrastructure projects—effectively serve the public interest or merely shift resources between different classes of beneficiaries &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48826827&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s funny how this kind of pricing works. A bag of weed captured is estimated at a thousand dollars. Ten movies pirated at twice that. We fire a JASSM in combat and it costs a lot of money. We fire it in training and it costs nothing. There is no financial impact estimated to require all elevators be big enough to turn a full length gurney around. A wealth tax will yield revenue for the next thirty years at 30 times what it will yield this year. $6.6 billion will end world hunger but $100…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48827393&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;  A wealth tax will yield revenue for the next thirty years at 30 times what it will yield this year. Isn&amp;#39;t this the opposite of how a wealth tax works? The annual turnover for e.g. Apple stock is ~0.4%, so a 0.8%/year wealth tax would triple the number of sellers without adding any new buyers. The negative effect on the price is outsized because most people hold long-term rather than buying or selling in any given year, but now people have to liquidate some every year in order to pay the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48829846&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The annual turnover for e.g. Apple stock is ~0.4%, so a 0.8%/year wealth tax would triple the number of sellers without adding any new buyers. Is that assuming the tax money is going into the void? I agree it might force roughly 0.8% of shares to be sold in a given year. But as to not adding any new buyers: no one&amp;#39;s being forced to buy stock in the same way, but shouldn&amp;#39;t someone be getting the money and potentially using it to buy Apple stock? Let&amp;#39;s imagine for a second the wealth tax money…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48830130&quot; title=&quot;Although the argument does look fundamentally reasonable, I think its biggest weakness is it doesn&amp;#39;t make an attempt to prioritise - yes taxes always make someone better off. So does wealth. A decision has to be made. Which is more valuable? We&amp;#39;ve got a highly reliable and effective system for working that out (aka the free market economy) and no alternative in 2nd place that doesn&amp;#39;t typically lead to mass starvation because someone underestimated how much food was needed. They people…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ciphercue.com/blog/european-web-hosting-vendor-share-2026&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Europe&amp;#39;s company websites are mostly served by US vendors&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ciphercue.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48816612&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;242 points · 170 comments · by adulion&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A study of nearly 20,000 European companies reveals that U.S.-headquartered vendors, led by Cloudflare, serve the majority or plurality of primary websites in most sampled markets, with Germany and Poland remaining the only exceptions due to their strong domestic hosting industries. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ciphercue.com/blog/european-web-hosting-vendor-share-2026&quot; title=&quot;Title: Europe&amp;#39;s company websites are mostly served by US vendors    URL Source: https://ciphercue.com/blog/european-web-hosting-vendor-share-2026    Published Time: 2026-07-07T12:07:01+00:00    Markdown Content:  We looked at the primary website apex and www records for 19,450 European company entities and asked a narrow question: which infrastructure vendor is serving the company&amp;#39;s main web presence?    Across seven European markets, US-headquartered vendors serve the majority of primary company…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The European tech landscape is heavily reliant on US vendors like Stripe and AWS because they offer superior developer experiences, managed services, and &amp;#34;all-in-one&amp;#34; ecosystems that European alternatives currently struggle to match &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817072&quot; title=&quot;As an Italian solo-founder, I have to admit that the US vendor dependency is really strong, but when you look at what you need to build a serious product, what can you actually use from European vendors that is even close to US products? Take Stripe as an example: is there a real alternative that covers what they do?  Not to talk about Cloud and Edge Computing vendors: GCP, AWS, Cloudflare... does anyone even get close to these products / companies and what they offer? Managed environments,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817201&quot; title=&quot;I get your point, and even in Italy we have Banca Sella (first one that comes to mind) which is a great way to collect payments with a local processor. But it&amp;#39;s not Stripe... Stripe is not just an integration for Link or Card payments, and payment fees are actually not that bad. Developer experience matters most to me.  Plus, I agree there are alternatives to a basic Stripe implementation, but what about Stripe Connect?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that mutual interdependence is beneficial and point to European dominance in hardware and lithography, others worry that the EU is dangerously over-reliant on US economic and military stability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818486&quot; title=&quot;A lot of these US vendors have data centers in the EU operating under EU law via legal entities in the EU. So, it&amp;#39;s not all that black and white. And there are a growing amount of EU based alternatives. And just to make a counter point, there are also US dependencies on the EU for some things as well. Mobile infrastructure is a good example; mostly comes from Nokia and Ericsson. What was left of US based network equipment makers was merged and acquired in the early 2000s. For example Bell Labs…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818677&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; IMHO this mutual interdependence is actually a good thing. It stimulates maintaining peaceful relations and engaging in trade. We could use a little more of that. Isolationism didn&amp;#39;t lead to anything good last century either. I think interdependence is a good thing, but I think the EU is _reliant_ on the US militarily and economically and that&amp;#39;s ... not great particularly when the US leadership is openly hostile toward Europe (and toward the US for that matter). I&amp;#39;m speaking as an American.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics suggest this gap persists due to cultural factors, such as a preference for hardcore open-source self-hosting or a bureaucratic aversion to taking risks on small startups &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48816859&quot; title=&quot;I find the Europe&amp;#39;s relationship with tech to be wired, there is one section that is hardcore-opensource fanatics, they want to host everything by themselves, and want to go through the trouble of keeping things updated, and would not want to use a close source tools even though they are developed by European counterparts. On the other side there are people who are techy but happy to use US products, and when you pitch something European they would cite some tool that&amp;#39;s better and bigger in US.…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817339&quot; title=&quot;There isn&amp;#39;t going to be &amp;#39;EU tech&amp;#39; as long as US can access the EU market as freely because for the mainstream anything it doesn&amp;#39;t make sense to have a duplication effort for the EU. USA is/was easier to start business and get funding, you can access Europe just as well from there so why bother with the European based stuff if you are targeting a broad market? After Trump now there is a reason to actually go for European base and EU is trying hard to clean up the field with things like EU-inc,…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some data suggests that European companies are actually more likely to use local infrastructure providers like OVH and Hetzner than is commonly perceived &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48817197&quot; title=&quot;I did a similar study but analyzing actual API subdomains, and ignoring those fronted by Cloudflare, Akamai, etc and the conclusion was the opposite: European companied are more likely to be using OVH and Hetzner than AWS/Azure https://bloomberry.com/blog/we-analyzed-50k-apis-heres-which...&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-07-06</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-07-06</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.xbox.com/en-us/2026/07/06/resetting-xbox/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Resetting Xbox&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (news.xbox.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48804993&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;736 points · &lt;strong&gt;933 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by dijksterhuis&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Xbox is restructuring its business by cutting approximately 3,200 roles through FY27, spinning off four studios including Double Fine and Ninja Theory, and flattening management layers to address low margins and a &amp;#34;severe hardware crisis.&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.xbox.com/en-us/2026/07/06/resetting-xbox/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Resetting XBOX    URL Source: https://news.xbox.com/en-us/2026/07/06/resetting-xbox/    Published Time: 2026-07-06T13:32:52+00:00    Markdown Content:  _This message was just sent to Team XBOX employees globally._    Team,    We are beginning the most significant restructure in XBOX history. After careful consideration, I’ve made the difficult decision to reduce our team by approximately 3,200 throughout FY27. This will include approximately 1,600 role eliminations today, and in addition, four…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft’s gaming division is facing intense scrutiny over a &amp;#34;thin&amp;#34; 3% profit margin ($150M on $5B revenue), which critics argue is a result of a decade of mismanagement, unsustainable Game Pass subsidies, and an expensive studio acquisition spree &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806237&quot; title=&quot;This is a total mess IMHO. - The make around 5 billion in revenue per quarter  - The problem according to them is profit margin - around 150-160 million So first of all, they are big! Secondly they are not at a loss. They just have a &amp;#39;thin, non-growing margin&amp;#39;. So to fix all this they are trimming down, so they can &amp;#39;return to growth&amp;#39; (which I think is ridiculous). Some points - - They are huge business even now - 5 billion per quarter revenue is no joke - They did not have to buy all those…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48809181&quot; title=&quot;150M at 5B revenue is not great: that&amp;#39;s 3% margin! The bigger issue is that console manufacturer revenue is highly cyclical. This is hard to see in e.g. Xbox and Sony since they are both part of a larger conglomerate, but really obvious for nintendo. You generally have a cycle of   - &amp;#39;Launch&amp;#39;: high marketing costs, low/negative HW margins  - &amp;#39;Mid-cycle&amp;#39;: lowering manufacturing costs, large game sales, high margin DLCs  - &amp;#39;end-of-cycle&amp;#39;: falling HW sales, fewer exclusives (-&amp;gt; preparation for next…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806398&quot; title=&quot;Game Pass was never a sustainable business model. People liked it because when a new game came out, they could buy a month of game pass for like $15, play through the game in a couple weeks, and cancel. It was a really good deal because Microsoft has spent the past decade+ trying to recover from their terrible fumble of the Xbox One launch, so they were subsidizing gamers to come back to their platform. With the money being spent on AAA titles these days, they are not going to make any money…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some blame recent leadership for failing to focus on product, others argue the &amp;#34;interactive Hollywood&amp;#34; model of high-budget cinematic games is failing across the industry, leaving Sony and Xbox in a &amp;#34;death spiral&amp;#34; while Nintendo thrives on lower-cost, gameplay-focused titles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805958&quot; title=&quot;It was pretty rich seeing armchair video game industry analysts act like the new CEO was gonna usher in a new age for Microsoft&amp;#39;s gaming division because she got to announce the updated logo and some games that would have obviously been in development long before she became CEO. Microsoft is never going to figure out gaming. It&amp;#39;s more art than engineering and they can barely manage the engineering with all the intervention from marketing and HR in their products. To me it&amp;#39;s mostly unfortunate…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805841&quot; title=&quot;At some point, the games industry decided it wanted to be interactive Hollywood, and the consequences are entirely predictable. Meanwhile, Nintendo just quietly shipped 3.8 million units of Tomodachi Life in two weeks, and 4 million of Pokopia in five. They&amp;#39;re making actual games. Sony&amp;#39;s obsession with prestige cinematic bloat, like Xbox, has also put them in a slow-motion death spiral that&amp;#39;s going to become painfully obvious in a few years.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806485&quot; title=&quot;I disagree, it wasn’t Phil that dug a hole but Asha who pushed Phil out with no plan. Why is Asha finally revealing her plan years later if she was such a good fit? She came in trying to automate away peoples jobs with AI for the last year or so and that is obviously failing. It wasn’t Phil that invested the entire company’s well being on stochastic parrots. She has done everything but focus on delivering games (product).&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong consensus that the pursuit of infinite growth and industry consolidation has backfired, leading to massive layoffs despite the division remaining technically profitable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806237&quot; title=&quot;This is a total mess IMHO. - The make around 5 billion in revenue per quarter  - The problem according to them is profit margin - around 150-160 million So first of all, they are big! Secondly they are not at a loss. They just have a &amp;#39;thin, non-growing margin&amp;#39;. So to fix all this they are trimming down, so they can &amp;#39;return to growth&amp;#39; (which I think is ridiculous). Some points - - They are huge business even now - 5 billion per quarter revenue is no joke - They did not have to buy all those…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806119&quot; title=&quot;This is incredibly sad for a lot of my friends who are finding themselves out of work despite delivering well received products. But at the same time I appreciate the candor of Asha saying that the corporate management are to blame and letting studios go back to being independent where possible. Phil Spencer really messed up. Everyone in the industry knew Microsoft were making bad calls trying to dig themselves a hole with gamepass and simultaneously digging a hole with their acquisition spree.…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48809485&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; 150M at 5B revenue is not great Considered as a raw percentage in a vacuum, sure, I guess, but we&amp;#39;re talking about... - A company which has undertaken a concerted, long-term effort to consolidate the industry under its umbrella (something they themselves call out as a problem in this post), reducing consumer choice - A company which has captured a significant chunk of the console market. They&amp;#39;re one of the big three (alongside Sony and Nintendo), and have been since the early 2000s, arguably,…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://martinalderson.com/posts/the-upcoming-ai-margin-collapse-part-1-glm-5-2/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GLM 5.2 and the coming AI margin collapse&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (martinalderson.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48809877&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;692 points · 468 comments · by martinald&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The emergence of high-quality open-weights models like GLM 5.2 threatens the high profit margins of frontier AI labs by offering a low-cost, easily integrated alternative for inference tasks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://martinalderson.com/posts/the-upcoming-ai-margin-collapse-part-1-glm-5-2/&quot; title=&quot;Title: GLM 5.2 and the coming AI margin collapse (part 1)    URL Source: https://martinalderson.com/posts/the-upcoming-ai-margin-collapse-part-1-glm-5-2/    Published Time: 2026-07-06T00:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  _This is a two part series focusing on what I believe is perhaps the least understood upcoming shift in AI economics. If you&amp;#39;ve enjoyed this and want to be notified about the second post, please feel free to sign up for my [newsletter](https://martinalderson.com/newsletter/)._    ## The…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Debaters are divided on whether AI margins will collapse, with some arguing that historical precedents like Cloud and Microsoft Office show that enterprises prioritize service guarantees, integration, and &amp;#34;someone to sue&amp;#34; over raw compute costs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811425&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not convinced raw costs matter: 1. Compute costs collapsed since the advent of Cloud and yet hyperscalers still have fat margins. 2. Many open source office suites exist yet none compete with the ubiquity of gsuite or office. GitHub, Slack are similar examples. 3. Both Windows and macOS dominate the home desktop space despite free alternatives existing for a long time. 4. Many formerly open source infrastructure components like Redis and Elastic Search have Apache equivalents, but they…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811989&quot; title=&quot;Those solutions have moats: 1. the cloud moat is mostly around talent really. Try finding people who can self host the alternatives to S3 et al at the HA and the scale the businesses need. Those alternatives are usually not free either, and each product might have its creator acquired (and the product cancelled) or similar. if you&amp;#39;re a larger business then the data lock in becomes a moat: getting your data out of the cloud is prohibitively expensive. Furthermore, large businesses have sweet…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, others contend that LLMs lack the traditional moats of data lock-in or high switching costs, making them more comparable to the commoditized memory chip or workstation markets of the past &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811845&quot; title=&quot;Unlike all your examples, switching out an LLM is both cheap an easy.  So easy that every 3 months or so new models are released and people grab them and start using them. The UX is the same regardless the provider.  You send in a prompt, it spits back an answer. In all your other cases, the cost to switch is losing support and a difficult transition period.  But in the case of LLMs, there was no support to begin with.  The transition is basically updating your current harnesses to know about…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48812948&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s a huge case of survivorship bias when trying to recall historical analogues, because in every instance where margins collapsed and competition made the industry a commodity business, the big proprietary names are no longer with us.  Here&amp;#39;s a selection of examples, though: 1. Memory chip margins collapsed so much in the 80s that Intel exited the memory chip business entirely.  At the time, they were known much more as a memory chip company than a microprocessor company. 2. Margins for…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811889&quot; title=&quot;They don&amp;#39;t just need healthy margins, they need to make back almost a trillion dollars in a couple of years. Comparing that to elastic search and redis doesn&amp;#39;t make much sense. Hyperscalers work because it actually has value compared to free offerings and because of the absolutely massive cost of switching providers. Similar with Windows and macOS. Extremely high cost of switching to something different, if possible at all. Same with office. Extremely high cost of switching due to compatibility…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users believe open-source models like GLM-5.2 already rival or exceed top proprietary models in utility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811882&quot; title=&quot;GLM-5.2 is not as good as Opus, it&amp;#39;s better. I can abliterate GLM-5.2 and have it work on projects that Opus refuses.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest the real margin pressure will come from technical optimizations like cached input tokens rather than just raw output &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811532&quot; title=&quot;Seems like a pretty pointless post that still centers around output tokens. In agentic coding, cached input tokens is 90% of the API &amp;#39;cost&amp;#39;. It doesn&amp;#39;t require GPU compute, and DeepSeek has shown that it can be done 50~100x cheaper with MLA/CSA/HCA, and a whole bunch of disks. This should collapse the margin.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openwrt.org/toh/openwrt/one&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OpenWrt One – Open Hardware Router&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (openwrt.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48808482&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;828 points · 325 comments · by peter_d_sherman&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The OpenWrt One is an open-hardware router featuring a MediaTek Filogic 820 SoC, WiFi 6, 2.5GbE WAN with PoE support, and an M.2 SSD slot. It ships with pre-installed OpenWrt firmware and includes a dual-boot NAND/NOR recovery system for failsafe maintenance. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openwrt.org/toh/openwrt/one&quot; title=&quot;Title: [OpenWrt Wiki] OpenWrt One    URL Source: https://openwrt.org/toh/openwrt/one    Markdown Content:  OpenWrt One is based on the MediaTek Filogic 820 SoC and has WiFi 6, dual-band, 3×3/2×2, 1x 2.5Gbit WAN, 1x 1Gbit LAN, 1GB DDR4 RAM, 256 MiB NAND, 16 MiB NOR (for recovery), M.2 SSD, USB-C Serial console and USB 2.0. Power Over Ethernet (POE): an IEEE 802.3af/at compliant device can power the device via the RJ-45 2.5 Gbps WAN connector.    [![Image 1: OpenWrt…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The OpenWrt One project is praised for extending hardware longevity and providing advanced capabilities beyond manufacturer patches, though some users find the platform&amp;#39;s installation and upgrade processes cumbersome compared to alternatives like OPNSense &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48808973&quot; title=&quot;They are working on an OpenWRT Two at the moment which will be Wifi 7. OpenWRT runs on a lot of hardware and its a great way to extend the life of a router past the manufacturers patches as well as gain a lot of capabilities. I wouldn&amp;#39;t buy a commercial router that wasn&amp;#39;t supported by OpenWRT now.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48809021&quot; title=&quot;How about OPNSense on open hardware of your choice, and passing messy wireless to separate AP? OpenWRT is very good, but the installation and upgrades are not easy. There is a zoo of images for different hardware, installation options and tools. It has to run on small devices, so there are limitations. The documentation on Wiki is scattered and could be improved. I had to search forums for weeks for a custom package installation for my router. Right now I have been trying to upgrade to the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48810566&quot; title=&quot;In case it is not, an old PC with a dual port Intel NIC running OPNSense is so far the best router I have ever used. I mean rock solid performance with near zero maintenance beyond adjusting VLANs and setting up a 6in4 tunnel over the past 5 years solid. My home network is larger, more diverse, and more complex than what I suspect most people have, with several hundred devices and yet I log into the OPNSense UI maybe twice a year and usually just out of curiosity. The learning curve is a little…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While enthusiasts appreciate the move toward official open hardware, there is criticism regarding the &amp;#34;spider-like&amp;#34; aesthetic of modern routers and the limited port selection on the current model &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48810324&quot; title=&quot;Why do they always have to look like some unholy blend of a cybernetic spider and a Knight Rider? What happened to a plain unassuming looking piece of industrial hardware...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48808762&quot; title=&quot;Just two Ethernet ports (1+2.5GbE), and it’s dual-band (no 6GHz)… I’m not sure who’s the target audience or what’s the use case.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussions also highlight the project&amp;#39;s historical roots in the Linksys WRT54G GPL lawsuit and the anticipation for a future &amp;#34;OpenWrt Two&amp;#34; featuring Wi-Fi 7 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48808973&quot; title=&quot;They are working on an OpenWRT Two at the moment which will be Wifi 7. OpenWRT runs on a lot of hardware and its a great way to extend the life of a router past the manufacturers patches as well as gain a lot of capabilities. I wouldn&amp;#39;t buy a commercial router that wasn&amp;#39;t supported by OpenWRT now.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48809433&quot; title=&quot;The planned specs are here, they say it will be made by GL.iNet: https://openwrt.org/voting/2025-02-12-openwrt-two Otherwise this router from GL.iNet has OpenWRT preinstalled, Wifi 7, 5x2.5G: http://www.gl-inet.com/en-gb/products/gl-be9300&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48809061&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m pretty sure the software side of the project is a direct descendent from the WRT54G stack. LinkSys got sued to release the firmware as it was GPL linked.  This dump got modified to make the WRT54G way more powerful than LinkSys ever planned but they got to sell the hardware for years more than would have been expected at the time.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/MaximeRivest/Riddle&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Fable turned reMarkable into Tom Riddle&amp;#39;s diary from Harry Potter&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811591&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;632 points · 421 comments · by modinfo&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A new open-source project called Riddle transforms the reMarkable Paper Pro into an AI-powered &amp;#34;Tom Riddle&amp;#39;s diary&amp;#34; that uses vision LLMs to read handwriting, &amp;#34;absorb&amp;#34; the ink, and write back in real-time using the tablet&amp;#39;s e-ink engine. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/MaximeRivest/Riddle&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - MaximeRivest/riddle: The diary of Tom Riddle for the reMarkable Paper Pro — write with your pen, the page drinks your ink and answers in a flowing hand    URL Source: https://github.com/MaximeRivest/Riddle    Markdown Content:  Write on the page with your pen. After a pause, the diary **drinks your ink** — your words fade into the paper — the page thinks for a moment, and an answer writes itself back in a flowing hand, stroke by stroke, then fades away.    No screen glow, no keyboard,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a lack of visual demonstration in the project&amp;#39;s README, though users eventually found a video link that some struggled to access due to social media login requirements &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811933&quot; title=&quot;This is one of those ideas that would really benefit from a short video demo, gif, or even a screenshot directly in the README. Otherwise, the title reads like a &amp;#39;Curtains for Zoosha?&amp;#39; meme. [0] [0]: https://www.reddit.com/r/BrandNewSentence/comments/15hcc4x/c...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811943&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s a video if you click around... https://x.com/MaximeRivest/status/2073544461473169432?s=20&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811946&quot; title=&quot;From the readme: https://x.com/MaximeRivest/status/2073544461473169432?s=20&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48812024&quot; title=&quot;After clicking play, there&amp;#39;s a prompt to log in. I had to use a video downloader service to watch it&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48812330&quot; title=&quot;I remember for roughly a month after Elon bought twitter he opened the site up again and public viewers could browse it. Now you can&amp;#39;t even click play on a video lol.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters debated the ethics of the &amp;#34;Tom Riddle&amp;#34; comparison, noting that while the fictional diary was a malevolent artifact, modern AI safety guardrails often lead to aggressive bans for sensitive research &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48812684&quot; title=&quot;Ironically, Tom Riddle&amp;#39;s diary encouraging kids to commit suicide [1] and then showing them how to do it would be more on brand than the version in the books. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deaths_linked_to_chatbots#Suic...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48812745&quot; title=&quot;Every AI would refuse the prompt. I was banned for researching Nordic assisted death and asking which drug exactly they administered (and what quantity). Claude refused, alerted Anthropic, and I was banned a couple days later. Thankfully the appeal form worked, but by then I was using a different Claude account praying they didn’t ban me again. There’s an uncensored model floating around that you can run locally with llama.cpp: https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1rq7jtm/qwen353...…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48812041&quot; title=&quot;I understand that this is kind of beside the point, but it seems like a bad thing to compare inventions to haunted artifacts that mind controlled their users into betraying their friends to a powerfully evil being. (Though since it is being powered by GenAI, which has also driven people to do bad things, perhaps it is an apt comparison.)&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48812845&quot; title=&quot;For a dash of dystopia: Imagine a company starts using that same LLM fuzzy-matching [0] against what you intend to be normal search activity , to detect &amp;#39;bad&amp;#39; queries and &amp;#39;bad&amp;#39; users who will be blocked. Maybe they&amp;#39;ll delete your SSO/email/videos/photos too, who knows. I can easily imagine it happening, especially after some point where they start using the same systems to &amp;#39;enhance&amp;#39; your query. [0] To be specific, your searches will be placed into a narrative document template, where a…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. One user expressed intense frustration with the project&amp;#39;s presentation, dismissing the AI-generated text in the documentation as &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; that lacks human care &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48812088&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; No screen glow, no keyboard, no chat UI. Just ink appearing on paper. No soul. No care. No consideration. Just slop appearing as text. Shut the *fuck* up BOT. How in the hell is this not the most appalling, offensive smell by now? All this says to me is someone proompted some garbage into barely working, didn&amp;#39;t even bother to look at what the stupid token machine generated for a readme. How unfathomably embarassing. I cannot take any project seriously no matter how silly it presents itself as…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.comaps.app/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;CoMaps – FOSS Offline Maps&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (comaps.app)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48808928&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;792 points · 213 comments · by basilikum&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CoMaps is a community-driven, open-source navigation app that offers offline maps, privacy-focused routing without data collection, and battery-efficient performance for hiking, biking, and driving. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.comaps.app/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Hike, Bike, Drive Offline – Navigate with Privacy    URL Source: https://www.comaps.app/    Published Time: Sat, 04 Jul 2026 20:15:15 GMT    Markdown Content:  Discover more of your journey - Powered by the community    [Download](https://www.comaps.app/download)    ![Image 1: Hike, Bike, Drive Offline – Navigate with Privacy](https://www.comaps.app/images/sections/hero.webp)    ### Offline Search and Route    Plan and navigate your trip abroad with just GPS, no need for mobile data. Search waypoints…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CoMaps is a fork of Organic Maps created to address concerns regarding proprietary components and centralized financial management within the original project &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48809914&quot; title=&quot;Relevant thread from yesterday&amp;#39;s thread on the original project this was forked from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794575 https://itsfoss.com/news/organic-maps-fork-comaps/ &amp;gt; Despite being advertised as a community-driven project, key decisions, including financial management, partnerships (with Kayak, for instance), and the inclusion of proprietary components in the code were made by a small group of shareholders, often without input from the broader contributor community.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Users praise the app for its ability to permanently save biking paths and easily add stops, though some note that its arrival time estimates can lag behind Apple Maps by 5–15 minutes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48810290&quot; title=&quot;I use CoMaps, it works great. You get notified in the app to download the updated maps you selected every 2 weeks or so. Could be wildly different than that, just what I notice. It&amp;#39;s timing estimates are often 5-15 minutes off Apple Maps, which I find accurate, on ~two hour drives, but I imagine it depends on the traffic. To improve OpenStreetMap, which CoMaps uses as the data source, I use StreetComplete[1]–it puts quests around your location which ask you questions, it&amp;#39;s user-friendly. A…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48810389&quot; title=&quot;This is the only app that allows you to easily add stops and permanently save paths for biking. Honestly a life changer.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While there is consensus that OpenStreetMap-based apps struggle with search quality and business data freshness compared to Google Maps, contributors recommend using StreetComplete to gamify the process of improving local map data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48810290&quot; title=&quot;I use CoMaps, it works great. You get notified in the app to download the updated maps you selected every 2 weeks or so. Could be wildly different than that, just what I notice. It&amp;#39;s timing estimates are often 5-15 minutes off Apple Maps, which I find accurate, on ~two hour drives, but I imagine it depends on the traffic. To improve OpenStreetMap, which CoMaps uses as the data source, I use StreetComplete[1]–it puts quests around your location which ask you questions, it&amp;#39;s user-friendly. A…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48810339&quot; title=&quot;My biggest issue with OrganicMaps is that the search isn&amp;#39;t very good. It really struggles to find my destination sometimes. That&amp;#39;s the one thing I&amp;#39;m afraid Google will always be better at.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48810315&quot; title=&quot;Does anyone know how fresh the business data is? like opening, closure, phone, address of businesses? i think one thing that&amp;#39;s going for google is the network effects and what it&amp;#39;s able to do.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. For adding missing hiking trails, experienced users suggest recording GPS traces with OsmAnd or Vespucci rather than StreetComplete, which is better suited for answering specific metadata &amp;#34;quests&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811291&quot; title=&quot;Do you know if you can add hiking trails using StreetComplete? I noticed some trails are missing in my area and I would like to contribute&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811489&quot; title=&quot;Last I checked, not with StreetComplete. But the OSM wiki has a table of Android apps https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Android which column &amp;#39;Record tracks&amp;#39; can be sorted by, to see which apps have that feature. How I&amp;#39;ve done similar before is to record a GPS trace with an OsmAnd plugin, upload it to OSM servers, import it as an overlay in the web-based editor on desktop, and used that and satellite imagery as reference to draw in the missing trail. In a pinch you can also record a trace and…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/thsottiaux/status/2073933490513752151&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra will be in Codex&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48799614&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;415 points · 403 comments · by mfiguiere&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The provided links suggest that the GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra model will be integrated into Codex. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/thsottiaux/status/2073933490513752151&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;x.com&amp;amp;#x2F;haider1&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2073695124220006575&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;x.com&amp;amp;#x2F;haider1&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2073695124220006575&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;haider1&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2073695124220006575&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;haider1&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2073695124220006575&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra coincides with reports that OpenAI has significantly reduced inference costs, a move mirrored by competitors like Anthropic who treat such &amp;#34;compute multipliers&amp;#34; as highly guarded trade secrets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48799827&quot; title=&quot;I wonder if it&amp;#39;s related that that OpenAI has found a way to cut inference costs by half, according to The Information. https://www.theinformation.com/newsletters/ai-agenda/openai-...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48800104&quot; title=&quot;https://archive.ph/NEwVz &amp;#39;However, these inference optimizations, which rival Anthropic refers to as “compute multipliers,” are a big focus for all the labs. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has been publicly talking about the concept since at least mid-2023, when he said on a podcast that the company limits “the number of people who are aware of a given compute multiplier” because it could give other AI labs a leg up if they were to be able to replicate them. (Compute multipliers can also refer to…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these efficiencies, some corporate users report a sudden shift in management sentiment from encouraging high token usage to demanding cost-cutting measures as the financial reality of LLM integration sets in &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48800134&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m working in large US corporation.  And I see that I already have access to 5.6-Sol Ultra on my corporate account. I haven&amp;#39;t really used it yet. 2 months ago management was showing us scoreboards, praising leaders who used most tokens.  Last few weeks, we&amp;#39;re getting weekly emails, telling us that whenever we can - we should use cheaper models, and that we should watch the page which shows our tokens usage.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48801443&quot; title=&quot;I’m in Finance and learned pretty quickly that to point out the implicit future cost raises based on the cost the LLM-providers need to recoup was unpopular at best (STFU better describes the situation). Running full force into a bear trap.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users question why previous high-performance models weren&amp;#39;t prioritized for release, others express skepticism regarding the stability of using stochastic agents in deterministic business processes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48801792&quot; title=&quot;The craziest for me is companies that sticking stochastic agents into automated business processes and expecting stable/reliable outcomes. Businesses want deterministic processes in the vast majority of cases.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48801904&quot; title=&quot;People are stochastic. You build reliable processes out of unreliable parts with feedback and self-correcting mechanisms. AI is not actually magically special in this regard. It has higher variance and we&amp;#39;re still figuring out how to get all the tradeoffs right.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48799977&quot; title=&quot;I still don&amp;#39;t know why OpenAI doesn&amp;#39;t put gpt-5.5-pro in Codex. It&amp;#39;s one hell of a model and easily parallels Fable/Mythos. Sure, it&amp;#39;ll use up your quota much faster but that&amp;#39;s the price some users are willing to pay for absolutely high quality responses. I think gpt-5.5-pro runs 12x parallel gpt-5.5 agents behind the scene and uses OpenAI&amp;#39;s secret sauce to synthesize their answers into one insanely good response.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/research/global-workspace&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A global workspace in language models&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (anthropic.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48808002&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;461 points · 199 comments · by in-silico&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic researchers discovered an emergent &amp;#34;J-space&amp;#34; in Claude models that functions like a human global workspace, allowing the AI to silently reason, report internal thoughts, and organize complex tasks through a centralized neural hub separate from its automatic processing. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/research/global-workspace&quot; title=&quot;Title: A global workspace in language models    URL Source: https://www.anthropic.com/research/global-workspace    Markdown Content:  [Video 3](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKV5JcALQoQ)    As you read this sentence, circuits in your brain are adjusting your posture, controlling your breathing, and transforming lines and curves on the screen into recognizable words. Most of this processing is invisible to you. But some of what takes place in your brain you _do_ have access to—an image that pops into…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a phenomenon where LLMs struggle with &amp;#34;reverse&amp;#34; recall, such as identifying a band from its description despite knowing the band&amp;#39;s details when prompted by name &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48810902&quot; title=&quot;This reminded me of some weird quirk/experiment I found with LLMs that I found while messing around, maybe someone can explain it or something. Open any AI chatbot that isn&amp;#39;t cheating by connecting to the Internet (so disable web search). Claude, DeepSeek, Kimi, whatever. Ask them this question: &amp;#39;What was that weird band from michigan from the 2000s that wore coloured ties&amp;#39; You will probably get a wrong answer, or if you&amp;#39;re lucky you&amp;#39;ll get a string of wrong answers with &amp;#39;wait, no - it&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811074&quot; title=&quot;Probably an instance of: &amp;#39;The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on &amp;#39;A is B&amp;#39; fail to learn &amp;#39;B is A&amp;#39; https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12288&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this &amp;#34;Reversal Curse&amp;#34; also affects human learning, others remain skeptical of comparing LLM limitations to human cognition &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811146&quot; title=&quot;Recall isn&amp;#39;t naturally bidirectional, even for humans. If you are learning vocabulary in a new language, it&amp;#39;s common advice to practice both target &amp;gt; source and source &amp;gt; target. Doing only one-way often makes you much better recalling that single direction than both.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811574&quot; title=&quot;I would need further convincing that humans do not naturally tend towards bidirectional recall. Perhaps I’m just on alert anytime I see an LLM-ism that’s met with a claim that the same or similar phenomena holds true in humans as well.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Participants suggest these architectural gaps might be bridged by increasing model parameters, repeating prompts, or duplicating specific layers associated with successful reasoning &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48809854&quot; title=&quot;Anyone remember that blog post from a few months back where someone was able to improve a model&amp;#39;s math ability by just duplicating layers that were activated while solving math problems? Just literally copy/pasting them and linking them together so the model ran through the same layers again? I get the feeling a lot more research is going to come out in the area of exploring exactly what portions of a model&amp;#39;s weights do what.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811648&quot; title=&quot;Really interesting paper, thanks for the share. The point their making in that paper reminds me of this paper some people shared around work earlier this year, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.14982 (Prompt Repetition Improves Non-Reasoning LLMs)... I wonder how OPs question would fare (or the questions presented in the paper you posted) given double repetition.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811276&quot; title=&quot;Ah, that big model smell. Every time someone somewhere says &amp;#39;an LLM can&amp;#39;t do this&amp;#39;, the next generation of LLMs gains one more parameter. Until that LLM can, in fact, do this.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lttlabs.com/articles/2026/07/06/amd-ryzen-ai-halo&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AMD Ryzen AI Halo – $4k AI Dev Kit&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lttlabs.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805624&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;373 points · 262 comments · by LabsLucas&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The $4,000 AMD Ryzen AI Halo is a compact mini-PC developer kit featuring the 16-core Ryzen AI Max+ 395 processor and 128GB of unified memory. Designed for AI development, it includes curated &amp;#34;Best Known Configurations&amp;#34; and software playbooks to streamline local LLM deployment and NPU utilization. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lttlabs.com/articles/2026/07/06/amd-ryzen-ai-halo&quot; title=&quot;Title: AI Dev Kit, Batteries Included - AMD Ryzen AI Halo | LTT Labs    URL Source: https://www.lttlabs.com/articles/2026/07/06/amd-ryzen-ai-halo    Markdown Content:  The [AMD Ryzen AI Halo](https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/desktops/ryzen/ryzen-ai-halo.html) is a truly mini-PC built around the Zen 5 [AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 processor](https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/laptop/ryzen/ai-300-series/amd-ryzen-ai-max-plus-395.html)(16 core, 32 thread) that streamlines learning AI…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The $4,000 price point for the AMD Ryzen AI Halo is widely criticized as poor value, with users noting that similar specs were available months earlier for significantly less &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805887&quot; title=&quot;In case it saves anyone some time (from the article):  &amp;#39;The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395(Strix Halo) processor has been available since Spring 2025 and the Halo doesn’t offer anything new on that front.&amp;#39; It has the same 256 GB/s memory bandwidth limit as every board previously, not sure why this is even being released right now as if it&amp;#39;s some new fangled thing - you can go get a Framework Desktop for roughly the same price or a GMKtec EVO-X2 for a bit cheaper.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48807774&quot; title=&quot;This. I bought Framework Desktop in November 2025 with almost these exact specs for ~$2.5k&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters argue that the device&amp;#39;s 256 GB/s memory bandwidth is insufficient for the cost, especially when compared to the superior software support of NVIDIA’s DGX Spark or the higher bandwidth of Apple’s Mac Studio &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806664&quot; title=&quot;I really want a 128gb+ machine but it&amp;#39;s brutal to be at only 256 GB/s for $4k (especially with the drawbacks of both ARM and AMD). I fear that by the time the RTX Spark comes out it&amp;#39;d have to be $6k, and by the time a 128gb or more machine with 700+  GB/s comes out it&amp;#39;d be at $10k, way out of most consumers&amp;#39; hands. Edit: capitalized gb/s to GB/s.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806111&quot; title=&quot;These devices were great when they were cheaper than the DGX Spark. But when they cost the same price (unless the Spark has shot up too), there&amp;#39;s no reason to buy this over a Spark. The Spark is literally a faster version of this, with better software support. Edit: And I say that as an owner of a Ryzen AI Max 395 device.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48808191&quot; title=&quot;This is just a little under the price of NVidia&amp;#39;s DGX Spark with CUDA or a Mac with 128GB and twice the memory bandwidth. The point of Strix Halo used to be that it was half the price of those way more capable machines. You&amp;#39;d be crazy to buy the AMD chip at this price. But the hardware market is generally crazy right now, so I&amp;#39;m sure this will sell as well, unfortunately.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Some suggest the industry has taken a &amp;#34;wrong turn&amp;#34; by prioritizing expensive DDR5 over increasing the number of cheaper DDR4 memory channels to achieve better performance at a lower price &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48807053&quot; title=&quot;32 Gb DDR4 RAM module has a bandwidth of 25 Gb/s and costs $160. If you buy 8 of these, you get 256 Gb RAM with 200 Gb/s bandwidth at $1280. And if you buy 16 x 16 Gb modules (each at $60) then you can get 400 Gb/s of bandwidth for $960. The only problem, you need 8 or 16 memory controllers. Memory controllers are not that expensive: Intel Core i3-14100F has 2 channel controller and costs $110, so we can estimate that 16-channel controller should cost not more than $880, and 8-channel…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48807353&quot; title=&quot;So what I am trying to say, industry took a wrong turn. Instead of moving to over-priced DDR5, they should just make even cheapest CPUs support 8/16 DDR4 channels. Because a 32Gb DDR5-4800 module costs $360, and two 32Gb DDR4-3200 modules cost $320, so you get twice more size, more bandwidth and it costs you less. DDR5 is just a rip off.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nintendo.com/en-gb/Support/Nintendo-Switch-2/Information-about-upcoming-battery-related-revisions-to-some-Nintendo-products-3132901.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Nintendo announces new product revisions in Europe with replaceable batteries&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nintendo.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48804193&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;367 points · 219 comments · by akyuu&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Starting in summer 2026, Nintendo will release revised hardware in Europe featuring user-replaceable batteries to comply with new EU regulations, including updates for the Nintendo Switch 2, Joy-Cons, and Pro Controllers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nintendo.com/en-gb/Support/Nintendo-Switch-2/Information-about-upcoming-battery-related-revisions-to-some-Nintendo-products-3132901.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Information about upcoming battery-related revisions to some Nintendo products    URL Source: https://www.nintendo.com/en-gb/Support/Nintendo-Switch-2/Information-about-upcoming-battery-related-revisions-to-some-Nintendo-products-3132901.html    Warning: Target URL returned error 403: Forbidden    Markdown Content:  Starting summer 2026, in preparation for upcoming changes in European battery regulations coming into effect in mid-February 2027, selected Nintendo products in Europe will begin to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users credit EU regulations for forcing Nintendo to prioritize consumer rights over planned obsolescence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805181&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;There is no difference in functionality between current products and revised products containing user-replaceable batteries.&amp;#39; So there was nothing &amp;#39;limiting&amp;#39; them from making it already with user-replaceable batteries, they just didn&amp;#39;t care enough until EU forced them (like all the smartphone brands). Love EU.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805484&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not that they didn&amp;#39;t care, it&amp;#39;s that they did care in the wrong way. A non-replacable battery means people will be more likely to buy a whole new device if (when) the battery fails.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48804214&quot; title=&quot;Honestly, amazing stuff. For all the flak that the EU gets this is absolutely an essential regulation&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others clarify that existing Nintendo hardware was already relatively repair-friendly compared to competitors, though it required specific tools like JIS screwdrivers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806449&quot; title=&quot;To be clear, all the mentioned Nintendo products are already designed for battery replacement, with well-contained battery units and easy connectors, and the batteries are available and problem-free to replace unlike for a certain fruit company. The redesign is because the ease of accessing the batteries did not comply with the new rules. The pro controller in particular requires almost complete disassembly to get to the module, and the Switch 2&amp;#39;s battery uses double-sided adhesive which is…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. The redesigns involve trade-offs, including potential reductions in battery capacity and increased weight or design complexity to accommodate easier access &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805353&quot; title=&quot;Except for an up-to-16% reduction in capacity, and slightly increased weight, depending on the product.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805710&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; So there was nothing &amp;#39;limiting&amp;#39; them from making it already with user-replaceable batteries, they just didn&amp;#39;t care enough until EU forced them (like all the smartphone brands). Love EU. At the very least, the design will be more complicated to accommodate replaceable batteries. That costs money. There&amp;#39;s a lot more to &amp;#39;limiting&amp;#39; than functionality.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806283&quot; title=&quot;I expect smartphones to look more like the Pro Controller tradeoffs than the joy cons. The issue with replaceable batteries is you need the extra space for the battery structure so unless phones grow they&amp;#39;ll have lower capacities. There&amp;#39;s also IP ratings, phones have pretty good IP ratings these days often surviving drops in puddles etc where none of these products have any official IP rating to preserve when adding doors etc for replacement batteries.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a consensus that while market forces failed to prioritize swappable batteries, these regulations ensure future hardware is designed with longevity in mind from the outset &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805911&quot; title=&quot;I think the more likely explanation is that there was not sufficient market motiviation to include the additional requirement of a user-swappable battery. ie. people care, but they don&amp;#39;t care enough or in enough volume for Nintendo to decide it&amp;#39;s required. I celebrate user-swappable batteries and I think I like the battery regulations. I just don&amp;#39;t think the Ghost of Iwata is under your bed twirling a Wario moustache while thinking about how to screw you over. The current Switch battery…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805761&quot; title=&quot;They could&amp;#39;ve just designed it that way to begin with. Thanks to this regulation, they will the next time around.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.map.signalbox.io&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Real-time map of Great Britain&amp;#39;s rail network&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (map.signalbox.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48802535&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;413 points · 155 comments · by scrlk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Signalbox provides a real-time interactive map that tracks the live movements and locations of trains across Great Britain&amp;#39;s rail network. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.map.signalbox.io&quot; title=&quot;Title: Signalbox - Live Train Map    URL Source: https://www.map.signalbox.io/    Warning: This is a cached snapshot of the original page, consider retry with caching opt-out.    Markdown Content:  [](https://www.mapbox.com/)    © Trainline | [© Mapbox](https://www.mapbox.com/about/maps &amp;#39;Mapbox&amp;#39;)[© OpenStreetMap](https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright/ &amp;#39;OpenStreetMap&amp;#39;)[Improve this…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on how Signalbox tracks train locations, with users debating whether the data is sourced from background smartphone tracking or publicly available rail feeds &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48802688&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Signalbox&amp;#39;s technology identifies the train a device is on by matching a snapshot of smartphone data to a train’s trajectory data. The technology uses advanced algorithms works even with severely degraded data. We are able to pinpoint a smartphone to any type of train without background location tracking or hardware. Hmm, that&amp;#39;s...interesting?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48802844&quot; title=&quot;Few questions, wonder if anyone knows the answers: 1. So it&amp;#39;s Trainline on a persons phone that is tracking this info and using it to enrich this service? I use Trainline and didn&amp;#39;t know it was doing that, but I do have location permissions on because I was told that powered the search picker when I started using the app. 2. What did they use _before_ Trainline? Or was Trainline selling user location data to them?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48802913&quot; title=&quot;No, live train data in the UK is already publicly available, e.g. see https://www.opentraintimes.com/ This is matching your phone&amp;#39;s location to the already public train data.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some expressed privacy concerns regarding apps like Trainline collecting location data, others clarified that the map likely utilizes existing open-source UK rail data to match a user&amp;#39;s specific device to a train&amp;#39;s trajectory &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48802787&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Acquired by Trainline in 2023, Signalbox works with organisations across the rail ecosystem to improve customer information and operational awareness.&amp;#39; https://www.signalbox.io/news/southeastern-launches-track-my...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48802876&quot; title=&quot;I think you&amp;#39;re misunderstanding what they are saying. They don&amp;#39;t use background location data, but they do use your current location data. Try the &amp;#39;Find My Train&amp;#39; demo on their site - it asks for location permission. Or their API - it also expects device location data: &amp;gt; At a minimum, requests to the detect endpoint _must_ contain a device&amp;#39;s location measurement. Additional fields can be included where available to improve the accuracy of the returned results as outlined below.…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48802913&quot; title=&quot;No, live train data in the UK is already publicly available, e.g. see https://www.opentraintimes.com/ This is matching your phone&amp;#39;s location to the already public train data.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable comparisons were also made to similar real-time rail maps in France &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48802726&quot; title=&quot;Checkout the French equivalent : https://carto.tchoo.net .   Looks more complete. Past similar HN submission got no attention, whereas the UK&amp;#39;s top page. Interesting ! https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45249351&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.uncommonapps.nyc/p/castro-podcasts-things-i-got-wrong-support&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Building relationships with customers through support didn&amp;#39;t turn out as hoped&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (uncommonapps.nyc)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48799929&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;347 points · 199 comments · by dabluck&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.uncommonapps.nyc/p/castro-podcasts-things-i-got-wrong-support&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a sharp divide between developers who view subscriptions as the only sustainable way to fund ongoing software maintenance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48802085&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; you can probably offer them a price that works for both of you There is no such price, because there is no way to sustainably develop a product without subscriptions. You can&amp;#39;t go to a local bakery and pay $24 for life to get fresh rolls every day. Every one-time price is a gamble, where somebody is betting on something. It&amp;#39;s a way to close your eyes and pretend ongoing costs do not exist.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48802895&quot; title=&quot;Software was always a subscription you bought version two then version three... It wasn&amp;#39;t obviously or explicitly a subscription but it still was one.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt; and users who argue that one-time fees for specific versions are more ethical and consumer-friendly &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48801185&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; You have to accept that your pricing model sucks to a group of people (who are likely experiencing subscription fatigue) and decide if it’s worth losing or never getting their money. And for some subscription situations, you can probably offer them a price that works for both of you. There&amp;#39;s a &amp;#39;PhotoSync&amp;#39; app that offers a premium option for either $1/month or $24 for life. Presumably because they looked at the average subscription duration and found it was in the region of 2 years. Modulo…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48802311&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; there is no way to sustainably develop a product without subscriptions This is clearly incorrect given that there are plenty of software developers who offer lifetime purchases. In fact there was a time that subscriptions for software were virtually unheard of. On a lower level, all that matters is the numbers. If your average customer stays subscribed for 24 months, then charging a lifetime fee equal to 24 months is equivalent to a subscription model. At that point it&amp;#39;s irrelevant what&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48800493&quot; title=&quot;I started off reading this article thinking &amp;#39;well, anyone who has ever maintained an open source project has almost certainly experienced the unending entitlement of users even when working for free&amp;#39;. But after reading the article, I&amp;#39;m not surprised your users dislike you more after communicating with them... &amp;gt; I have already thought about this a great deal. I am not changing anything based on your email. &amp;gt;  User can provide details for us, but if others aren’t experiencing it, it’s unlikely to…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics suggest that the author’s failure to build relationships stems from an &amp;#34;arrogant&amp;#34; support strategy that dismisses user feedback on pricing and bugs as low-priority or uninformed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48800670&quot; title=&quot;Thinking about customer support as a ‘differentiator’ or a way to drive profit is depressing. You should simply strive to do what’s best for your customers. The sort of feedback you’re getting is golden and in the right hands can be put to use rather than be dismissed. Assuming that people who disagree with your pricing model just don’t understand how business works is really telling. You have to accept that your pricing model sucks to a group of people (who are likely experiencing subscription…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48800493&quot; title=&quot;I started off reading this article thinking &amp;#39;well, anyone who has ever maintained an open source project has almost certainly experienced the unending entitlement of users even when working for free&amp;#39;. But after reading the article, I&amp;#39;m not surprised your users dislike you more after communicating with them... &amp;gt; I have already thought about this a great deal. I am not changing anything based on your email. &amp;gt;  User can provide details for us, but if others aren’t experiencing it, it’s unlikely to…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, some successful developers share that treating support as a core part of product development can foster a loyal community that provides free marketing and high-quality bug reports &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48803308&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;I’ve rarely gotten useful answers from support from services I use. I thought if I used my own product every day, read every email and answered it thoughtfully, people would appreciate this, and it would build some degree of loyalty and appreciation. I run an app with 16,000 users and receive 2–5 support tickets per week. I read every one of them. Around 20% of my app has been built based on user suggestions. People are generally kind and promote my app across multiple platforms for free. I…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theargumentmag.com/p/should-dayquil-be-legal&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Should DayQuil Be Legal?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theargumentmag.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806289&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;241 points · &lt;strong&gt;302 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by paulpauper&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Critics argue that combination cold medicines like DayQuil should be restricted because they often pair ineffective &amp;#34;placebo&amp;#34; ingredients with high markups and pose significant risks for accidental acetaminophen overdoses. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theargumentmag.com/p/should-dayquil-be-legal&quot; title=&quot;Title: Should DayQuil be legal?    URL Source: https://www.theargumentmag.com/p/should-dayquil-be-legal    Published Time: 2026-07-06T10:02:21+00:00    Markdown Content:  [![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the high toxicity of acetaminophen, with users noting its &amp;#34;safety ratio&amp;#34; is narrower than heroin and that it remains a leading cause of preventable liver failure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48808254&quot; title=&quot;The article kinda glossed over it, but one fact under-appreciated by the general public is just how dangerous acetaminophen overdoses can be . Scientists often talk about the &amp;#39;therapeutic index&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;safety ratio&amp;#39; of a drug.  It&amp;#39;s the LD50 (dose at which 50% of recipients die) divided by the effective dose.  Common hard drugs like heroin or methamphetamine have a safety ratio of about 6-10 [1].  &amp;#39;Soft&amp;#39; drugs like marijuana or LSD often have safety ratios of about 1000. The safety ratio of…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48807284&quot; title=&quot;No it should not be, but not because of the dextromethorphan or the phenylephrine being ineffective. By far the biggest issue is the acetaminophen it contains, which it isn&amp;#39;t super obvious about, and frequently leads to acetaminophen overdoses. The vast majority of acetaminophen overdoses occur because people combined different medicines containing it (like DayQuil and Tylenol) without realizing they were taking the same thing multiple times. Its a completely preventable cause of liver failure…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue for stricter regulations or making it prescription-only due to the risk of accidental overdose when mixing multi-symptom &amp;#34;cocktails&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48807284&quot; title=&quot;No it should not be, but not because of the dextromethorphan or the phenylephrine being ineffective. By far the biggest issue is the acetaminophen it contains, which it isn&amp;#39;t super obvious about, and frequently leads to acetaminophen overdoses. The vast majority of acetaminophen overdoses occur because people combined different medicines containing it (like DayQuil and Tylenol) without realizing they were taking the same thing multiple times. Its a completely preventable cause of liver failure…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48807305&quot; title=&quot;Acetaminophen (Tylenol) is probably the OTC drug that is at the top of the list to be made RX-only due to its dangers.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48808757&quot; title=&quot;Acetaminophen should be treated with more caution in general. So many people have reacted with shock and upset when I told them that taking Tylenol (or anything with acetaminophen in it like Dayquil/Nyquil) while drinking can cause immediate liver damage.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others advocate for total drug deregulation, blaming the &amp;#34;war on drugs&amp;#34; for replacing effective ingredients like pseudoephedrine with substandard alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806650&quot; title=&quot;All drugs should be legal, full stop. And I should be able to get medical drugs on my own, without a permission slip from a doctor I have to convince. Drug prohibition has caused magnitudes more harm than decriminalization and legalization. And part of this article is about claims from what is likely inert or mild effect at best. Remember, we used to have amphetamines, pseudoephedrine, and much more potent drugs to alleviate colds and such. But because of the forever-drug-war , we&amp;#39;re stuck with…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48807612&quot; title=&quot;Please no.  We need to be going the other way on that trend: converting things which won&amp;#39;t easily outright kill/maim you (and dare I say, even potentially addictive ones) at normal doses from Rx to OTC!  Acetaminophen is one of the few cheap, easy, and working products on the shelf!&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant debate regarding the efficacy of DayQuil&amp;#39;s active ingredients; some claim the article cherry-picks data to ignore positive studies on Dextromethorphan &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48807137&quot; title=&quot;This article uses the trick where you pick studies that support your argument and ignore all of the studies that disagree with it. There are other studies where Dextromethorphan improves both objective and subjective measures of coughing: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37232330/ They also picked a study that shows honey outperforming Dextromethorphan but ignored all the studies that show honey performing similarly or slightly worse than Dextromethorphan, or studies where honey showed no…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, while others note that even if it doesn&amp;#39;t cure a cough, its dissociative effects at higher doses make illness more tolerable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806679&quot; title=&quot;Dextromethorphan is definitely not a placebo. Take enough and you&amp;#39;ll go to space and meet God. Smaller doses produce euphoria and dissociation, which, even if they don&amp;#39;t make the cough go away, makes it easier to tolerate a cold -- same reason antitussives have historically contained alcohol, cannabis extract (which may incidentally work as bronchodilator but was not the reason I imagine it was in antitussives) Funny amphetamine used to be an over the counter cold medicine, which the article…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.macrumors.com/2026/07/06/apple-silicon-exec-explains-mac-mini-ai-demand/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apple Silicon Exec Explains Mac Mini AI Demand and On-Device Future&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (macrumors.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805598&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;220 points · &lt;strong&gt;311 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by tosh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple executive Doug Brooks says the Mac mini and Mac Studio are seeing high demand for AI agent workloads due to their ability to run local, isolated tasks 24/7 using Apple silicon&amp;#39;s integrated Neural Engine and accelerators. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.macrumors.com/2026/07/06/apple-silicon-exec-explains-mac-mini-ai-demand/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Apple Silicon Exec Explains Mac Mini AI Demand and On-Device Future    URL Source: https://www.macrumors.com/2026/07/06/apple-silicon-exec-explains-mac-mini-ai-demand/    Published Time: 2026-07-06T05:10:43-07:00    Markdown Content:  [Skip to Content](https://www.macrumors.com/2026/07/06/apple-silicon-exec-explains-mac-mini-ai-demand/#maincontent)    [![Image 2: MacRumors](https://images.macrumors.com/images-new/macrumors-simple-logo-light.svg)![Image 3:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on whether Apple can dominate the AI market by leveraging high-bandwidth memory and local privacy, with some suggesting a &amp;#34;Private Cloud Compute&amp;#34; appliance could command prices upwards of $10,000 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48856250&quot; title=&quot;Apple could probably sell a machine starting at $10,000 if they architected it as the sole place one’s Private Cloud Compute [1] ran. It would need a path to a $2,500 machine, I think. But this is a niche I don’t think another consumer-facing brand could do like Apple. [1] https://security.apple.com/blog/private-cloud-compute/&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48856258&quot; title=&quot;The out-of-stock $6000 M3 Ultra Mac Studios with 800GB+ memory bandwidth are going for $24,000 on eBay, so yes definitely&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48861519&quot; title=&quot;Apple has totally failed to deliver interesting AI experiences so far ... and I still think they&amp;#39;re going to be the dominant provider of AI in 5 years. We&amp;#39;re just one or two advances in chips / models / both away from being able to run very good local models for free on mid-tier Apple devices. The privacy, cost, and latency story there will be too much for OpenAI/Anthropic/Google to beat. Just writing this down so I can be praised/mocked in 5 years.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that local inference will eventually win on latency and cost, others contend that cloud providers will maintain a &amp;#34;knock-out punch&amp;#34; due to their ability to run massive parallel workloads and utilize specialized hardware like Groq that cannot be run locally &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48861519&quot; title=&quot;Apple has totally failed to deliver interesting AI experiences so far ... and I still think they&amp;#39;re going to be the dominant provider of AI in 5 years. We&amp;#39;re just one or two advances in chips / models / both away from being able to run very good local models for free on mid-tier Apple devices. The privacy, cost, and latency story there will be too much for OpenAI/Anthropic/Google to beat. Just writing this down so I can be praised/mocked in 5 years.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48863811&quot; title=&quot;Here’s the two main reasons why local inference won’t compete any time soon with the cloud: 1. Most useful LLM work is done in parallel. A Mac Mini can run one LLM inference thread at a time. The cloud can spool up dozens and spread that inference across efficiently batched operations over a fleet of hardware. 2. Faster inference hardware such as the chips from Cerebras and Groq cannot be run locally. But the advantages of running &amp;gt;5x the token throughput per thread can’t be overstated. Add in…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant skepticism regarding whether current high resale prices for Mac Studios reflect long-term demand or merely a temporary supply crunch in the RAM market &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48856379&quot; title=&quot;I don’t think we should use current prices as landmarks for large scale demand. That Studio’s current prices is inflated because of a (presumably) short term supply crunch, not because the average user is willing to pay $24k for a home AI inference device. It assumes that RAM remains supply constrained and that none of the existing RAM contracts are cut short. But Meta and xAI putting A TON of AI compute onto the market. OpenAI and Anthropic are raising the costs of inference (by reducing how…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48856833&quot; title=&quot;What makes you think the supply crunch is short-term?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48856993&quot; title=&quot;If demand doesn&amp;#39;t fall down or current manufacturers supply go up, somebody (presumably in China) will spin up fabs. Apple wanted to use blacklisted Chinese RAM already.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://elm-lang.org/news/faster-builds&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Road to Elm 1.0&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (elm-lang.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48803364&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;348 points · 183 comments · by wolfadex&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Elm 0.19.2 has been released as the first in a series of updates leading to version 1.0, featuring compiler performance improvements that reduce memory usage and speed up build times for large projects. &lt;a href=&quot;https://elm-lang.org/news/faster-builds&quot; title=&quot;Title: Road to Elm 1.0    URL Source: https://elm-lang.org/news/faster-builds    Markdown Content:  I have a lot of compiler improvements piled up, and the road to 1.0 is essentially to incorporate them into Elm in a sequence of small releases. The release today is a little compiler performance improvement to just get things started, and I hope you will [give it a try](https://github.com/elm/compiler/releases/tag/0.19.2)!    ## Faster Builds with Elm 0.19.2    I love a fast compiler. When a programmer…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The announcement of Elm 1.0 has sparked debate over whether the language was &amp;#34;dead&amp;#34; or simply stable, given that the previous release was seven years ago &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48803645&quot; title=&quot;Oh my God, I had no idea this project was still alive. I don&amp;#39;t mean to throw any shade but I had assumed that the lid was on this turkey.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48803841&quot; title=&quot;The project was dead. The previous release was 7 years ago, where it stopped because the creator (same as author of this announcement) stopped maintaining it and since the community hasn&amp;#39;t progress beyond a BDFL-model that&amp;#39;s where it died. So it was dead, it just now has been resurrected (and AFAIK with a whithered community in the meantime).&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48803981&quot; title=&quot;your definition of dead is elms definition of stability, I think :D haha javascriptland really warps peoples minds on stability and project-liveness&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users praise Elm&amp;#39;s stability and its suitability for LLM-assisted coding due to its opinionated architecture &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48803880&quot; title=&quot;About two years ago I was experimenting with ChatGPT vibecoding a snake game in the browser in elm, because elm is my favorite language. It was rough going and I concluded at the time that LLM‘s might kill elm. Today I use elm in production and LLMs are vastly better at it, and if anything I think LLM‘s might increase elm adoption because it is the ideal language for an LLM right now. It’s a simpler language than most, it’s stable, it has an opinionated architecture built into the language…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48803839&quot; title=&quot;Stability. It works. Frequent breaking changes to core functionality of your tech stack is not a feature, it’s a bug.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others criticize the Benevolent Dictator for Life (BDFL) model and a history of breaking changes that alienated the community &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48804668&quot; title=&quot;I think of Elm more as an incredibly influential research language these days. It&amp;#39;s very focused, there&amp;#39;s no public roadmap or official support and the leadership (which is far as I can tell is just Evan) is uninterested in most (any?) community building or core team building. But MAN is it nice to work in. This has resulted in several forks/spin-offs. At the recent Gleam conference, Louis Pilfold joked that every Elm user maintains their own compiler :).  There are at least 6 of them (two more…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48803841&quot; title=&quot;The project was dead. The previous release was 7 years ago, where it stopped because the creator (same as author of this announcement) stopped maintaining it and since the community hasn&amp;#39;t progress beyond a BDFL-model that&amp;#39;s where it died. So it was dead, it just now has been resurrected (and AFAIK with a whithered community in the meantime).&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805665&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Then the author just kind of disappeared and the project stalled. There was more to the story than that. They made some major breaking changes in v0.19 that broke a lot of apps and left no path for them to continue with Elm, then dug their heels in when the community protested. If you had an app at your company that used the features they decided not to allow any more, you either had to start deciding which fork to follow or start planning to rewrite your app in something else. That…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Consequently, many now view Elm as an influential &amp;#34;research language&amp;#34; that has inspired numerous forks and successors like Gleam, rather than a primary choice for new production projects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48804668&quot; title=&quot;I think of Elm more as an incredibly influential research language these days. It&amp;#39;s very focused, there&amp;#39;s no public roadmap or official support and the leadership (which is far as I can tell is just Evan) is uninterested in most (any?) community building or core team building. But MAN is it nice to work in. This has resulted in several forks/spin-offs. At the recent Gleam conference, Louis Pilfold joked that every Elm user maintains their own compiler :).  There are at least 6 of them (two more…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805280&quot; title=&quot;Yeah Elm has had a very strange arc, but I think calling it a research language is right. There was a period where it was heavily evangelized. Many blog posts were written and talks given, and there was a lot of enthusiasm and adoption. Then the author just kind of disappeared and the project stalled. Which of course he had a right to do since it’s his project, but I think he should have set expectations better from the beginning. The heavy evangelism helped spread the ideas, but also set up…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48803718&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s a lot to love about Elm, and I&amp;#39;ve written quite a bit of production code with it starting around 0.18.0. But in 2026 I&amp;#39;m not sure why a company would newly choose a language that hasn&amp;#39;t otherwise been updated in nearly 7 years.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://raheeljunaid.com/blog/anthropics-method-to-losing-goodwill-in-a-few-easy-steps/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Anthropic&amp;#39;s Method to Losing Goodwill in a Few Easy Steps&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (raheeljunaid.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48803751&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;246 points · 192 comments · by raheelrjunaid&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic is facing criticism for &amp;#34;enshittification&amp;#34; and anti-consumer practices, including unstable APIs, predatory pricing changes, and vendor lock-in that restricts subscriptions to its own buggy tools while competitive open-source models and third-party harnesses offer more flexible, cost-effective alternatives for developers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://raheeljunaid.com/blog/anthropics-method-to-losing-goodwill-in-a-few-easy-steps/&quot; title=&quot;Title: [PSA] Anthropic&amp;#39;s Method to Losing Goodwill in a Few Easy Steps — Invidious Musings    URL Source: https://raheeljunaid.com/blog/anthropics-method-to-losing-goodwill-in-a-few-easy-steps/    Markdown Content:  &amp;gt; Edit: This was a hit on [HackerNews](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48803751) and I received a ton of valuable feedback. I’ve put markers for the amendments I’ve made    Recently, I had the rare opportunity to test several agent harnesses, LLMs, and AI gateways in my daily tasks…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on Anthropic&amp;#39;s recent product decisions, with users debating whether bundling discounted tokens with their proprietary &amp;#34;Claude Code&amp;#34; software is a fair exchange of VC-subsidized value or an anti-competitive move that stifles innovation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48804964&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;re subsidizing their tokens as long as you use their software. That&amp;#39;s a fair exchange, I never understood why people took issue with it. If you don&amp;#39;t want to get locked in to Claude Code, you can pay more. Just like you can pay more for an unlocked non-carrier subsidized phone. (Which I personally do.)&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805257&quot; title=&quot;This method of bundling should be illegal in general, as it stiffles competition.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805299&quot; title=&quot;How does it stifle competition / innovation? You can use other harnesses, pay API for anthropic models or cheap chinese models. You&amp;#39;re just upset that you don&amp;#39;t get to use their VC money the way you want to use it lol. It either is a good deal or it isn&amp;#39;t, if it is just say, thanks free VC money, if it isn&amp;#39;t say fuck you.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics highlight technical frustrations, specifically the &amp;#34;kludgy&amp;#34; Electron-based interface and restrictive authentication flows that hinder automation and containerized workflows &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805295&quot; title=&quot;If that were the only issue, I’d say Anthropic were fine. Dario took the tremendous goodwill his row with Hegseth gave him and blew it. The major problems are Anthropic’s back-end instability and front-end kludginess (Electron!) revealing the gap between Anthropic’s capability and marketing, and Dario bizarrely copying Altman’s 2023 fire-and-brimstone playbook that had already massively backfired.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805388&quot; title=&quot;Using Electron in this day and age shows a particular lack of effort, considering how easy it is to use an agent harness to build native versions of apps. I mean, we&amp;#39;re a tiny little business and we somehow find the bandwidth to do it.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48804510&quot; title=&quot;Think I&amp;#39;m about to switch. I can&amp;#39;t build the automations i&amp;#39;m trying to with claude code anymore. Since they locked away the non-interactive usage and channels can&amp;#39;t be used without interacting with the console on startup. I had a good web interface for running CC in containers in k8s but I think it&amp;#39;s time to bail out and build around a codex subscription and pi.dev now. I have local models hooked up to pi dev and that&amp;#39;s working well. Had it build itself Channels equivalent so agents can talk to…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that rising open-source models will soon squeeze Anthropic&amp;#39;s premium market share, others maintain that the high hardware costs of running open models will keep proprietary providers relevant for most users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48804535&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s looking like Anthropic is realizing that they&amp;#39;re about to get squeezed so they need to juice revenue for their IPO before it becomes obvious to everyone else. Open models like GLM 5.2 are getting good enough to handle 90% of tasks, and will eat most of their usage unless they start serving it at cost. And on the 1% work they fearmongered their way into falling under government control, which will limit how much they can commercialize the frontier. Nobody will keep paying their premiums and…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48804747&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Open models like GLM 5.2 are getting good enough to handle 90% of tasks, and will eat most of their usage unless they start serving it at cost. Most people either don’t have the money to buy hardware to run open models and/or don’t have the utilisation to make renting cost effective.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dernocua.github.io/notes/aluminum-foil.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aluminum foil (2021)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (dernocua.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48804297&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;283 points · 141 comments · by firephox&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This technical exploration details the physical properties of aluminum foil and its potential for advanced applications, including origami, solar concentrators, and &amp;#34;matter compiler&amp;#34; bootstrapping through work-hardening and folding techniques. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dernocua.github.io/notes/aluminum-foil.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Aluminum foil ⁑ Dernocua    URL Source: https://dernocua.github.io/notes/aluminum-foil.html    Published Time: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 18:35:36 GMT    Markdown Content:  Kragen Javier Sitaker, 02021-05-24 (updated 02021-09-11) (14 minutes)    Kitchen aluminum foil is a remarkable material.    It’s typically 10 μm thick and 400 mm wide, giving it an aspect ratio of 40000 in that dimension, and rolls are commonly some ten meters in length, for an aspect ratio of 1 000 000; [heavy-duty versions can reach 30…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights aluminum foil&amp;#39;s versatility, ranging from its utility as a sterile surface for lab work &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805497&quot; title=&quot;Another thing not mentioned on there about aluminium foil is how clean it is. We work with a laminar flow hood and pull a fresh layer of foil anytime we are working to create a clean base to work on. I can guarantee you that if you run a swab over a fresh sheet of foil and smear it onto sterile nutrient agar that it won&amp;#39;t grow anything - that said, we use costco foil which is thicker gauge and not the budget thinner stuff which is definitely inferior.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt; to its potential as a low-cost material for solar concentrators or recyclable corrugated boxes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805836&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Alternatively, though, it might be possible to stiffen the foil by making the equivalent of corrugated cardboard out of it, maybe using aqueous boric acid (US$1.70/kg according to Potential local sources and prices of refractory materials) or borax as the glue. The surface tension of water is ample to hold aluminum foil in place until the water dries. Hello Amazon? Billion dollar idea here. This needs more attention. You could have fully recyclable aluminum boxes instead of cardboard. Imagine…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806208&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; 50¢/m² is 50¢/kWp in a solar concentrator, or 0.05¢/Wp, which is noticeably cheaper than photovoltaic cells, currently around 18¢/Wp, 360 times more expensive. A photovoltaic cell is a solar panel, and a piece of aluminium does nothing, am I missing something here?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users dismiss the article as &amp;#34;rambling&amp;#34; about imaginary applications &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48804946&quot; title=&quot;This is pretty much just rambling about how amazing aluminium foil is because it&amp;#39;s so thin and that might enable all sorts of wonderful imaginary applications. Very HN. It&amp;#39;s aluminium foil.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others are intrigued by the author&amp;#39;s theoretical proposal of using folded foil to create complex, self-replicating mechanical &amp;#34;compilers&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805015&quot; title=&quot;I was enjoying the ADHD hyper focus writing, kind of following along, then: &amp;gt; If we figure that the foil can meaningfully change direction every 20 μm, then we might think of an aluminum-foil machine as being made of “moving parts” on the order of 1000 μm² (50 μm × 20 μm), 1000 “parts” per square millimeter of foil; a roll of kitchen aluminum foil is enough to fabricate some 4 billion “parts”. A bootstrapping compiler might require 100 000 parts and thus a square centimeter of aluminum foil,…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Safety remains a point of contention: some argue it is a perfectly safe food-grade material &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806308&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s non-toxic and food safe, and yet a significant number of people on the internet still act like it&amp;#39;s poison that will give you Alzheimer&amp;#39;s. I wonder how many of those people touch their lips to the lid of an aluminum beverage can. Or how they might bake a lasagna at home.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, while others warn that high heat and acidic or salty foods can cause significant leaching &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48807751&quot; title=&quot;You shouldn&amp;#39;t use aluminum foil with tomato/lemon/vinegar/brined foods or as &amp;#39;grilling packets&amp;#39; (direct fire/high heat) because of leaching risk. There&amp;#39;s no concern with using aluminum in most cases (with dry/non-acidic foods) but leaching is a real problem with acidic/salty/wet/high eat.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://spectrum.ieee.org/stochastic-parrot&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What Emily Bender meant by &amp;quot;stochastic parrots&amp;quot;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (spectrum.ieee.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805401&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;170 points · &lt;strong&gt;222 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by digital55&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Computational linguist Emily Bender revisits her influential &amp;#34;stochastic parrots&amp;#34; paper five years later, clarifying that the term describes how large language models mimic patterns without comprehension and addressing modern concerns like exploitative labor practices and the misleading nature of the term &amp;#34;artificial intelligence.&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://spectrum.ieee.org/stochastic-parrot&quot; title=&quot;What Emily Bender Really Meant by &amp;#39;Stochastic Parrots&amp;#39;    Five years later, its lead author revisits the paper in the age of ChatGPT    [IEEE.org](https://www.ieee.org/)[IEEE Xplore](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/home.jsp)[IEEE Standards](https://standards.ieee.org/)[IEEE Job Site](https://jobs.ieee.org/)[More Sites](https://www.ieee.org/sitemap.html)    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#34;stochastic parrot&amp;#34; metaphor remains a point of contention, with debate over whether it accurately describes LLM capabilities or serves as a pejorative for broader social and environmental criticisms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805915&quot; title=&quot;Five years on, which term do we see as less accurate to describe LLMs? Artificial Intelligence or Stochastic Parrot? I guess it&amp;#39;s still an open debate.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806513&quot; title=&quot;Whether Bender intended it or not, the term has an inherently pejorative sense. &amp;#39;Parroting&amp;#39; is not really indicative of what modern LLMs do. However, when most people bring it up as a criticism of &amp;#39;AI in general&amp;#39; in 2026, they&amp;#39;re using it as a pointer to all of the social/environmental criticisms, rather than the technological capabilities.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the term is more accurate than &amp;#34;Artificial Intelligence&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806370&quot; title=&quot;I don’t see a problem with the “stochastic parrot” label. It just turns out stochastic parrots are incredibly useful. At a minimum it’s probably more accurate than “AI”.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that LLMs demonstrate a level of comprehension beyond mere pattern repetition &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806009&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It argued that large language models (LLMs) generate text by statistically predicting likely sequences of words rather than understanding what they are saying—a process the authors captured with the metaphor of a “stochastic parrot,” a system that repeats patterns without comprehension. I don&amp;#39;t understand what we&amp;#39;re setting the record straight on. This is the core point of dispute, and the author just blazes past it to focus on other things. I&amp;#39;m glad to hear &amp;#39;stochastic parrot&amp;#39; isn&amp;#39;t intended…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt; or note that human communication often mirrors this &amp;#34;autopilot&amp;#34; behavior &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805982&quot; title=&quot;The term is not very useful since most humans are stochastic parrots... At least most of the time. Not suggesting that I don&amp;#39;t say stuff on autopilot sometimes but for many people, it&amp;#39;s their only mode of operation. They never actually think about anything from first principles. Their whole approach to language is just chaining catchphrases together. It&amp;#39;s how a toddler thinks; it seems like many people never moved past that stage of development.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Much of the thread focuses on the controversy surrounding the paper&amp;#39;s authors and the validity of its claims, particularly regarding the scale of AI&amp;#39;s environmental impact compared to other industrial sectors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806092&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; in part because Google fired two of the authors, Timnit Gebru I remember being angry about this situation when I first saw it on social media, until I read the details: This person submitted a list of demands to her employer and said that if they weren’t met, she quit. Google wasn’t going to meet her demands so they considered it acceptance of her resignation. There has been a movement trying to debate whether it was a firing or resignation ever since. The original paper they published gets…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806399&quot; title=&quot;I think part of it is she had excellent PR skills and a dedicated fan base. I was at Google when she quit, working in ML, and hadn&amp;#39;t heard of her until the story broke. I remember there were a large number of Memegen posts about it, but no one I spoke with knew about her, so I assumed it was brigading. I think she&amp;#39;s since since lost a lot of her allure, especially when she didn&amp;#39;t change her mind when the facts about the AI water usage changed 1000x&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48807230&quot; title=&quot;The hysteria around water usage rests on people not knowing the scale of industrial civilization. First thing to do is compare any estimate of data center water usage with the water usage of almond farming. Or, if you want to focus on individual consumer choices, the water footprint of eating a hamburger.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ternlight-demo.vercel.app/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ternlight – 7 MB embedding model that runs in browser (WASM)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ternlight-demo.vercel.app)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811644&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;325 points · 67 comments · by soycaporal&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ternlight is a lightweight, CPU-based embedding model that enables fast semantic search directly in the browser via WASM without requiring API calls or server-side processing. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ternlight-demo.vercel.app/&quot; title=&quot;Title: ternlight · semantic search · React docs    URL Source: https://ternlight-demo.vercel.app/    Markdown Content:  An embedding model in 7 MB.    Runs on your CPU. No API.    Drop it in, embed text in milliseconds, and never call a server.    Runs in your browser    no API call    Engine + weights · 7 MB    mini variant · 5 MB    Fast embeddings · ~5 ms    CPU only · no GPU    USE IT    ## Three lines to semantic search    Ships as a single npm package. No model download step, no server.    $`npm install…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ternlight is a 7-megabyte embedding model designed for on-device semantic search and intent matching, utilizing ternary quantization and a custom Rust/WASM inference engine &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811645&quot; title=&quot;Hobby project, I wanted to &amp;#39;ship a useful model in a web browser&amp;#39;. so I distilled a small sentence encoder from MiniLM with ternary quantization-aware training. Also wrote the inference engine from scratch and shipped in Rust → WASM SIMD. It&amp;#39;s an embeddings model, not an LLM: text goes in, a 384-dim vector comes out, and cosine similarity between two vectors tells you how related the texts are — regardless of shared words (&amp;#39;reset my password&amp;#39; ↔ &amp;#39;I forgot my password&amp;#39; → 0.88). Used for semantic…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While users praised the potential for decentralized search ecosystems and offline applications &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48812176&quot; title=&quot;I added an offline search engine to app.wazzup.im/search (no login or payment required). First search downloads the model from the internet and subsequent runs are from the cache. The model is very small so it&amp;#39;s not the best for everything but it&amp;#39;s good for basic math and coding. Give it a try.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48813838&quot; title=&quot;This would be a pretty cool addition to the duckdb HNSW search project I found on here some time ago: https://github.com/jasonjmcghee/portable-hnsw What I think is really cool is that the search happens using http range queries across statically hosted parquet files. I think things like this could bloom into a relatively open and distributed search ecosystem that isn’t controlled by major corporations.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, some reported performance issues in Safari or significantly slower embedding speeds than advertised on older hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48812837&quot; title=&quot;In Safari, stuck on: Loading model... + Loading search results... Or sometimes &amp;#39;Service Worker API is available and in use.&amp;#39; + &amp;#39;Loading search results...&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48813424&quot; title=&quot;Nice, I&amp;#39;m really interested in using this for simple semantic search in a native desktop application. Any comparisons with other tiny embedding models? Did you start from MiniLM-L6 because it&amp;#39;s an especially good model in its class? It&amp;#39;s hard to figure this out since all you provide is &amp;#39;Retrieval (SciFact NDCG@10)&amp;#39;. But the claimed performance seems way off, I get only 35 emb/sec in firefox on a i5-4570 rather than 400/sec. Is there an issue with falling back to a non-SIMD path? I&amp;#39;ll try a…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Concerns were also raised regarding the high CPU load triggered by the demo and the potential for websites to use such models for intrusive client-side tracking &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48812070&quot; title=&quot;This is cool! but also maybe you could put a button on the landing page to trigger the demo because it&amp;#39;s a bit startling to hear my fans go crazy when opening a webpage.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48812240&quot; title=&quot;Great, now my websites are gonna push entire LLMs onto my browser in order to use my CPU to make inferences about my shopping habits or whatever.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.publicnotice.co/p/kalshi-cnn-cnbc&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How Kalshi Infects the News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (publicnotice.co)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48804123&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;192 points · 184 comments · by everybodyknows&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CNN and CNBC are extensively promoting Kalshi prediction markets to viewers while frequently failing to disclose their financial ties and ownership stakes in the platform, raising concerns about editorial independence and the accuracy of the data being reported. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.publicnotice.co/p/kalshi-cnn-cnbc&quot; title=&quot;How Kalshi infects the news    CNN and CNBC are pushing Kalshi on viewers but not telling them the whole story.    [![Public Notice](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!d7xc!,w_40,h_40,c_fill,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F27a23854-104e-4c0d-8b6e-68b082c65a5b_1280x1280.png)](/)    # [Public Notice](/)    SubscribeSign in    # How Kalshi infects the news    ### CNN and CNBC are pushing Kalshi on…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of &amp;#34;gamblification&amp;#34; in society is widely condemned as a &amp;#34;cancer&amp;#34; fueled by government greed and the selective enforcement of gambling laws &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805486&quot; title=&quot;The unprecedented era of gambling on literally everything everywhere is an absolute cancer on society, made completely legal by absolute greed and degeneracy at the highest levels of government. I don&amp;#39;t know how we put this genie back in the bottle (amongst many detrimental genies).&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48805636&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s amazing how naked it is that laws just don&amp;#39;t apply to certain people.  Kalshi et al are obviously gambling, and yet somehow all the laws about gambling have been politely forgotten by law enforcement.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806321&quot; title=&quot;Unfortunately, the gambling industry is going to have a much wealthier and more powerful lobby than any effort to displace it.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Some argue this trend stems from a lack of traditional wealth-building avenues for young people, such as affordable real estate or stable careers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806179&quot; title=&quot;There is a market for the gamblification of everything because there is no other widely accessible path for young people to build a future. A college degree is no longer a guaranteed path to a stable, well paying job. Building wealth through real estate is no longer viable. With no clear options the only visible path to building a modicum of wealth is timing the next big crypto rugpull, hitting a 5 leg parlay, ripping a shiny charizard etc... We can (and should) try and regulate away this kind…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48807130&quot; title=&quot;Just start a small business, or build wealth through real estate is a take that indicates some severe divorce from the reality of poverty in America. You need both capital (which folks don’t have access to) and the ability to absorb risk (which folks don’t have access to). Similar advice is in the vein of just stay with your parents for free, have a relative invest $50,000 in your business to start it up. This runs counter to your internal narrative as a self made person I’m sure, but have you…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48808431&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; you can always find a plausible sounding excuse why failure is inevitable I think this starts to make an inferred narrative about how failure is inevitable and that its excessive complaining, when there is large amounts of data showing how it is genuinely more difficult. Just your Ukrainian example, it was cheaper to live 25 years ago, the cost of college has gone up ~180%. Since 2001 incomes have gone up 64% while housing has gone up   136%, healthcare up 180%, food up 100% and…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, others maintain that financial success remains achievable through &amp;#34;boring&amp;#34; hard work and relocation to lower-cost areas, dismissing systemic complaints as excuses for failure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48806613&quot; title=&quot;That perception bears almost no relation to reality. The most reliable path to building a modicum of wealth has remained the same for generations: start a small business in some boring field and work your ass off for 80 hrs/wk. Building wealth through real estate is also still totally possible outside of the HCOL metro areas. Try unfashionable areas like Cleveland or Oklahoma City. And let&amp;#39;s not have any low-effort comments claiming that there are no good jobs available in those places: the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48807823&quot; title=&quot;If you try hard enough you can always find a plausible sounding excuse why failure is inevitable. And yet on Saturday at the neighborhood Independence Day party I met a guy who immigrated from Ukraine about 25 years ago with no money, no college education, no family support, and no English language skills. Instead of complaining he just went to work and while not exactly wealthy he&amp;#39;s now doing fairly well as an electrical contractor. Life is usually a struggle. No one should expect any…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://spectrum.ieee.org/small-language-models-ai-pharmaceuticals&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Small AI Models Gain Traction In places with unreliable networks&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (spectrum.ieee.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48812055&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;277 points · 82 comments · by sscaryterry&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Small AI models are gaining traction in developing regions by providing critical services like medical authentication and disease detection on low-power devices, bypassing the need for the high-speed internet and massive data centers required by larger models. &lt;a href=&quot;https://spectrum.ieee.org/small-language-models-ai-pharmaceuticals&quot; title=&quot;Why Small AI Models Could Power Health Care Where Big Tech Cannot    In places with unreliable networks and no data-center infrastructure, smaller is better    [IEEE.org](https://www.ieee.org/)[IEEE Xplore](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/home.jsp)[IEEE Standards](https://standards.ieee.org/)[IEEE Job Site](https://jobs.ieee.org/)[More Sites](https://www.ieee.org/sitemap.html)    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether the future of AI lies in massive general-purpose models or specialized, local &amp;#34;tiny&amp;#34; models that mimic the modular structure of organic brains &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48814070&quot; title=&quot;I strongly believe this premise in the article is correct - we will see a lot of tiny, hyper specialized models for individual tasks, and perhaps that will converge with an orchestration layer for a generalized intelligence that controls these specialized tiny models, that will be quite capable. I don&amp;#39;t foresee AGI arising out training bigger LLMs (Though investors won&amp;#39;t realise that for a while yet). It&amp;#39;s actually how organic brains work - specialized tasks are offloaded to local cortical…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48814902&quot; title=&quot;No this will never work. Domain specific models will never be a thing because intelligence carries over and compounds. Why didn’t OpenAI release a math specific model? Why not a literature specific one? Why do they instead have generic models of different sizes? And how did all labs converge on this? Why does Fable just not train on non cybersec and non biology data but instead have clearly costly and annoying classifiers?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that intelligence compounds and general models will always remain more robust &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48814902&quot; title=&quot;No this will never work. Domain specific models will never be a thing because intelligence carries over and compounds. Why didn’t OpenAI release a math specific model? Why not a literature specific one? Why do they instead have generic models of different sizes? And how did all labs converge on this? Why does Fable just not train on non cybersec and non biology data but instead have clearly costly and annoying classifiers?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48814897&quot; title=&quot;General purpose models are always more robust and generally better than smaller narrower models. My bet is that compute will catch up and any “small” model will still be generally capable, just smaller than sota, rather than intentionally narrow. The exception would be for very well defined tasks where the data distribution never varies, but these are rare and don’t really need “AI” anyway when they do exist.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others point to domain-specific successes like AlphaFold as evidence that narrow models excel where general LLMs fail &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48815064&quot; title=&quot;Your examples (math, literature) involve natural language. It stands to reason that a general language model will be more competitive in those domains. If you want examples of successful domain-specific models, look at AlphaZero and AlphaFold. LLMs aren&amp;#39;t anywhere close to achieving that level of competence at abstract strategy games or protein folding. &amp;#39;This will never work&amp;#39; is a pretty confident assertion for a field that&amp;#39;s so young and rapidly evolving.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Regarding emergency use, debate persists over whether a power-hungry LLM-in-a-box is practical compared to simple e-ink storage of reference materials, though some suggest home-based models could support local mesh networks during disasters &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48812962&quot; title=&quot;Is anyone making LLM-in-a-box for emergency supply kits yet? I feel that would be handy in all sorts of situations when networks are down.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48813303&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; LLM-in-a-box for emergency For most actual emergency scenarios, a device that focuses on storage of large amounts of prepared normal reference material [0] will be wayyyyy cheaper, more durable, portable, and able to run on batteries or  being constantly plugged into a somehow-still-normal electrical grid. (Think an e-ink tablet that can run off a 5V battery pack buffering a literal handcrank.) In contrast, imagine spending the money to build a beefy LLM-running computer with good GPU/RAM,…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48813907&quot; title=&quot;You can run a small model off a home generator — so in an emergency, you’d turn on both the generator and information service, eg, a mesh for “quick” responses querying that huge collection of information. That way your machine that, eg, normally plays video games or does AI work can support relief efforts by supporting emergency response IT. You don’t need to mothball the machine, just have an “emergency” boot USB than can run the services from your home generator. You don’t even need to bring…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-07-05</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-07-05</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://organicmaps.app/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Organic Maps&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (organicmaps.app)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794446&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;882 points · 261 comments · by tosh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Organic Maps is a free, open-source, and privacy-focused offline navigation app for hikers, cyclists, and drivers that reached 6 million installs in 2025. &lt;a href=&quot;https://organicmaps.app/&quot; title=&quot;Organic Maps: Offline Hike, Bike, Trails and Navigation    Free, open-source, fast, privacy-focused, detailed offline maps for travelers, tourists, drivers, hikers and cyclists created by MapsWithMe/Maps.Me app founders    [News](/news/)  •  [Donate](/donate/)  •  [Contribute](/contribute/)  •  [Help](/faq/)  •  [GitHub](https://github.com/organicmaps/organicmaps)    [ ]     🌐 EN    * [Afrikaans](/af/)  * [العربية](/ar/)  * [Català](/ca/)  * [Čeština](/cs/)  * [Cymraeg](/cy/)  * [Deutsch](/de/)  * [Ελληνικά](/el/)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Organic Maps is praised for its offline capabilities and integration with OpenStreetMap (OSM), users remain divided over its search functionality and lack of real-time traffic data compared to &amp;#34;Big Map&amp;#34; alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48795982&quot; title=&quot;All these apps rely on the data provided by OpenStreetMap (OSM). It is a Wikipedia-like project where anybody can contribute edits. https://www.openstreetmap.org/&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794847&quot; title=&quot;There are two things keeping me using &amp;#39;Big Map&amp;#39;. 1. Address lookups. Many of the buildings in OSM have yet to get street addresses added, so navigating to an address is a bit hit or miss. This gets fixed with time as people update the maps and wouldn&amp;#39;t be a show stopper. 2. Real time traffic and detour navigation. This is really needed when navigating around busy cities where a wreck on a major highway can result in significant delays. This needs a combination of an external service (separate…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794741&quot; title=&quot;Organic Maps a great app in many ways, but I still don&amp;#39;t get how people can actually use it every day and say it replaces Google Maps when its search feature totally stinks. I know it&amp;#39;s a hard problem, but this is the number one thing that needs to somehow be fixed. I can&amp;#39;t tell if I&amp;#39;m just too dumb or if FOSS/degoogle fanboys are just pretending. I just know I&amp;#39;ve tried to use it exclusively many times and always had to give in to Google Maps because the search totally failed.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Governance concerns regarding the project&amp;#39;s funding and server transparency led to the creation of CoMaps, a fork focused on modernizing the codebase and adding features like CarPlay Dashboard support &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794631&quot; title=&quot;Organic Maps was my go to app for a navigation app where you can fix errors yourself immediately! So much better than having to work for free on the proprietary apps, and hope they accept your edits There’s a fork from one year ago, CoMaps, that is gaining different features E.g., I am adding CarPlay Dashboard support that you can test by joining the TestFlight We are in great need of both more testers and some proper iOS devs (I am not). We’re racing to get scene lifecycle support by…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794575&quot; title=&quot;There is also CoMaps ( https://www.comaps.app/ ) which is a fork of Organic Maps, after concern over the governance of Organic Maps https://itsfoss.com/news/organic-maps-fork-comaps/&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48795369&quot; title=&quot;Some parts of the server were closed source for a bit. No longer the case. Also people got upset that the developers used the product funding to pay for their personal expenses. The idea is folks want the developers to isolate all the money they make from this project and use it to only pay expenses directly related to this project. If they need to eat or something they should get a job, presumably. https://www.comaps.app/news/2025-04-16/1/?ref=itsfoss.com&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. To improve the underlying data, contributors recommend gamified tools like StreetComplete to help fill in missing address information &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794847&quot; title=&quot;There are two things keeping me using &amp;#39;Big Map&amp;#39;. 1. Address lookups. Many of the buildings in OSM have yet to get street addresses added, so navigating to an address is a bit hit or miss. This gets fixed with time as people update the maps and wouldn&amp;#39;t be a show stopper. 2. Real time traffic and detour navigation. This is really needed when navigating around busy cities where a wreck on a major highway can result in significant delays. This needs a combination of an external service (separate…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48795988&quot; title=&quot;StreetComplete is one of my favorite apps. It&amp;#39;s like Pokemon Go mixed with Wikipedia because it gamifies contributing to OpenStreetMap, which powers (all?) mainstream opensource maps. Looking forward to iOS support so more people can use it. https://streetcomplete.app/ https://www.openstreetmap.org/&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://unsung.aresluna.org/if-youre-a-button-you-have-one-job/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;If you&amp;#39;re a button, you have one job&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (unsung.aresluna.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48790689&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;546 points · 258 comments · by nozzlegear&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The linked article argues that a button&amp;#39;s primary function is to be pressed, emphasizing the importance of tactile feedback and reliable interaction in design. &lt;a href=&quot;https://unsung.aresluna.org/if-youre-a-button-you-have-one-job/&quot; title=&quot;Related: &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;aresluna.org&amp;amp;#x2F;show-your-hands-honor&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;aresluna.org&amp;amp;#x2F;show-your-hands-honor&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The core frustration in modern UI design is the &amp;#34;broken&amp;#34; button that fails to provide consistent feedback or process inputs independently of animations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792015&quot; title=&quot;I used to have a device with a physical button which, when you pressed it, would beep and add 30 seconds to the time. However, sometimes it would beep and not add 30 seconds, and sometimes it would add 30 seconds without beeping, so you always had to squint at the dim display to discover whether it had worked or not. I thought this must be a peculiarly bad design ... but since then I have lost count of the number of purely software buttons that somehow seem to replicate this broken behaviour:…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48791571&quot; title=&quot;Looking at the first comparison, I will admit, I thought the issue was with the iPhones example. The button and slider below the image disappear, then fade back in after each press of the rotate button, a behaviour I have seen on iOS across many applications that irks me to no end. The Screenshot app being a particular bug bear of mine. If you have a UX element that I will be able to interact with before and after an interaction, then keep it visible during the transformation, process,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest implementing &amp;#34;tape-out rules&amp;#34; to programmatically prevent established UX warts, others argue that universal agreement on design standards is impossible, citing the controversial shift from skeuomorphism to flat UI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48791624&quot; title=&quot;I wish software apps had &amp;#39;tape-out rules&amp;#39; the way that computer chips do. Basically, when you design a computer chip, a program reviews the design and compares it against something like 300 pages of rules with stuff like &amp;#39;wires of X metal and Y metal can&amp;#39;t be within Z distance of each other&amp;#39;. We could make something similar for UX. Just a bunch of design pattern constraints that throw flags if you try to ship something with well established UX warts.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48791679&quot; title=&quot;There’s effectively no universal list of UX warts people agree with. The Flat UX fad was objectively terrible on just about every metric I was taught, but people were actively pushing for such designs.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792069&quot; title=&quot;What’s wrong with flat UIs? Skeuomorphic designs have served their purpose of helping people get used to computers, but now that is no longer necessary.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical failures often stem from poor &amp;#34;debouncing&amp;#34; logic, where software fails to correctly filter physical contact bounce or buffered user clicks, leading to unpredictable behavior and lag &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48791701&quot; title=&quot;How about when users accidentally click too much, or they believe the first click didn’t register? I am still reminded of a keynote where Steve Jobs was demoing how much faster PDF documents would display on the newer macOS. So he had engineers put a button in for him to click that would scroll through the PDF on the screen, and he accidentally clicked it more than once. Steve wondered aloud if it would scroll all the way through twice… and sure enough, it buffered the process! He had to wait…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792271&quot; title=&quot;Bad programming. People who have experience with embedded programming knows that reading out a button usually means denouncing. At the speed a microcontroller can read out a button it will change it&amp;#39;s state multiple times per press because of contact bounce. Meaning when a user presses a button the program sees off, on, off, off, on, on, off, on, on, on, on, on, on, etc. Now if you just naively read out the current state of the button and do something with it elsewhere in the program looping…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792484&quot; title=&quot;Debouncing exists for a reason. Sometimes when a button is clicked twice, you want it executed twice, sometimes you don&amp;#39;t. Distinguishing which is better in which situation is not trivial. At the very least, you should consider which is appropriate for which situation, what if, in your UI, for some buttons one is the obvious choice, for others it&amp;#39;s the other, but for some it&amp;#39;s not so clear, and both behaviours are defensible? Now you&amp;#39;ve got an inconsistent UI. I have no good solution for this.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792654&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;averaging the last 50 reads and wait till the majority is either off or on. This is a bad way to do it because it adds avoidable latency. A moving average is a low-pass filter. The switch bounce is better handled by hysteresis. Change state as soon as you see an edge, then ignore further edges until a timer expires, e.g. 5 ms, which should be enough for the bouncing to settle. A 5 ms timeout limits your repetition rate to 100 presses per second, which is beyond human capabilities. You might…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.opentools.studio/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OpenPrinter&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (opentools.studio)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48797916&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;638 points · 156 comments · by bouh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenPrinter is a repairable, open-source printer featuring refillable ink cartridges and a modular design to reduce electronic waste and printing costs. The compact device supports standard sheets or paper rolls and is compatible with multiple operating systems via a driver-free, open-source print server. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.opentools.studio/&quot; title=&quot;Title: OpenTools / OpenPrinter    URL Source: https://www.opentools.studio/    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: open printer logo](https://www.opentools.studio/web/image/1465-63b0e402/Open%20printer%20Logo%20capot%20V2.webp)    is a **repairable,****compact**, and **robust****printer designed to last**.    **Fully repairable** and equipped with a **refillable ink system**, it adapts to your needs while **reducing your printing costs**.    **Easy to maintain**, it offers a sustainable, economical, and…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The OpenPrinter project faces skepticism regarding its technical feasibility and &amp;#34;open source&amp;#34; status, as it relies on proprietary HP cartridges that integrate the complex printhead technology &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798157&quot; title=&quot;Interesting comment from last time this was posted https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48093670 Inkjet printing requires orders of magnitude more engineering expertise, materials science, industry experience and financial resources than most people imagine. That is the reason, open inkjet printers don&amp;#39;t exist despite having been consumer products with the same drawbacks for more than forty years.  That is why this is a pre-crowdfund landing page without a demonstrating a working prototype. I…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798253&quot; title=&quot;On the technology side, I&amp;#39;m somewhat hopeful because it looks like they&amp;#39;re using off-the-shelf HP ink cartridges for this. HP cartridges embed the printhead into the cartridge itself, and that printhead is arguably the most complicated part of the entire device. Outsource the printhead, and you&amp;#39;re just designing a plotter with a PCL interface. I agree that the bigger challenge is going to be patents. It also wouldn&amp;#39;t surprise me to see HP add DRM to cartridges to authenticate the printer itself…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798287&quot; title=&quot;From the specs: Compatible cartridges      HP 63 and HP 63 XL (US)    HP 302 and HP 302 XL (Europe)    HP 803 and HP 803 XL (Asia) So they just use HP inkjet technology. That makes it less open-source, but even &amp;#39;open source&amp;#39; parts are going to be under non-commercial license (CC BY-NC-SA) anyway.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this modular approach simplifies the design to a basic plotter, others point out that the project&amp;#39;s CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license excludes commercial use and does not meet the standard definition of open source &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798253&quot; title=&quot;On the technology side, I&amp;#39;m somewhat hopeful because it looks like they&amp;#39;re using off-the-shelf HP ink cartridges for this. HP cartridges embed the printhead into the cartridge itself, and that printhead is arguably the most complicated part of the entire device. Outsource the printhead, and you&amp;#39;re just designing a plotter with a PCL interface. I agree that the bigger challenge is going to be patents. It also wouldn&amp;#39;t surprise me to see HP add DRM to cartridges to authenticate the printer itself…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798280&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Open Printer is distributed under the Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 license. So not open source.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798295&quot; title=&quot;Unless I&amp;#39;m missing something using this in a commercial application would be a license violation: &amp;gt; Open Printer is distributed under the Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 license. &amp;gt; This means that everyone is free to use, share, and modify the project, provided they credit the original author, share derivatives under the same license, and do not use it for commercial purposes. It&amp;#39;s also not opensource yet, there&amp;#39;s a vague mention of &amp;#39;when its ready&amp;#39; it&amp;#39;ll be released.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Many users suggest that for most consumers, a laser printer remains a more reliable and practical alternative to inkjet technology, which is prone to clogging and high engineering hurdles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798375&quot; title=&quot;It really makes more sense to just buy a laser printer, in almost all cases.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798194&quot; title=&quot;This is interesting, but it seems to be a crowdfunding campaign only. I wish them the best of luck (the cause is worthy for sure), but buyer beware at this point. (I myself don&amp;#39;t 2D print enough that an ink based printer makes sense for me. Ink tends to dry, so for me a laser printer that can sit for months at a time makes more sense. I use the scanner as well as my 3D printer far more often.) I wonder how they will handle the nonsense around yellow tracking dots[1] etc. Hopefully that doesn&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798488&quot; title=&quot;I had an Epson Ecotank for a couple of years. The printer heads got clogged all the time. We bought a series of cleaning products to address it, they often solved the problem for only a few prints. We finally gave up and bought a Brother laser printer. This project seems like it&amp;#39;s trying to address a similar market to the Ecotank. What assurances can the project team provide that OpenPrinter will have better reliability?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798238&quot; title=&quot;I talked a bit about this years ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37007815 TL;DR: I&amp;#39;m surprised this isn&amp;#39;t a laser printer, as those are actually quite a bit easier to design and manufacture, especially if you can use a cheap, older, commonly available, remanufacturable toner cartridge.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://popcar.bearblog.dev/its-about-ownership/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;It&amp;#39;s not about physical vs. digital games, it&amp;#39;s about ownership&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (popcar.bearblog.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794750&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;384 points · 286 comments · by popcar2&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sony&amp;#39;s reported move to all-digital consoles by 2028 threatens consumer ownership by eliminating the ability to trade, resell, and preserve games. Unlike the open PC ecosystem, this shift creates a &amp;#34;walled garden&amp;#34; that risks turning gaming into a subscription-only service where players lose permanent access to their libraries. &lt;a href=&quot;https://popcar.bearblog.dev/its-about-ownership/&quot; title=&quot;Title: It&amp;#39;s not about physical vs digital games, it&amp;#39;s about ownership    URL Source: https://popcar.bearblog.dev/its-about-ownership/    Published Time: Sun, 05 Jul 2026 20:12:25 GMT    Markdown Content:  _05 Jul, 2026_    A few days ago, PlayStation announced that they&amp;#39;ll stop producing disks for new games starting from January 2028, confirming what we already felt was going to happen: consoles are going fully digital, and the disk drive will cease to exist.    I&amp;#39;ve seen a lot of great discussions on the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate centers on whether digital &amp;#34;purchases&amp;#34; should grant permanent property rights, including the ability to transfer ownership or access content offline if servers sunset &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48796520&quot; title=&quot;I am generally not in favor of adding regulation, but this is a place where I would support it. Anything that you BUY needs to be your property. This means you must have the ability to: 1. Transfer ownership of it (either temporarily as a loan or permanently as a sale). Digital-only doesn&amp;#39;t preclude this: the store can have a &amp;#39;transfer&amp;#39; functionality. 2. (Within reason) use it at your discretion at any point after the sale. This means that a company cannot &amp;#39;revoke&amp;#39; your access at a later time.…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48797625&quot; title=&quot;I understand his comment as being against dumb regulation that only ads unnecessary bureaucracy or stops/limits progress. But he would support a regulation for this because it&amp;#39;s a violation against the property of the buyer.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that the term &amp;#34;buy&amp;#34; is being deceptively used to mask what are essentially rentals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48797674&quot; title=&quot;Digital sales overwhelmingly use &amp;#39;buy&amp;#39; as the term in their UI, not &amp;#39;rent&amp;#39;.  Rental is a separate thing, and I don&amp;#39;t think roughly anyone is saying rentals should not exist in any form.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48797714&quot; title=&quot;I think you misunderstood, the major issue is that companies are actually &amp;#39;renting&amp;#39;, it&amp;#39;s just at 100k words long terms of services where they redefine &amp;#39;purchase&amp;#39; as rental. California has actually done something about this, you can longer claim that customers are &amp;#39;buying&amp;#39; when they&amp;#39;re actually just renting. If i claimed i sell a house for 500K but the in terms of sale redefine sale as rent the house for 500K and i can claim the property back anytime, that&amp;#39;d be crime yet it&amp;#39;s somehow legal with…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that consumers understand they are purchasing licenses and that &amp;#34;buying&amp;#34; services like haircuts or hotel stays does not imply ownership of the underlying assets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48797618&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Anything that you BUY needs to be your property. This is obviously absurd as a universal rule. If I &amp;#39;buy&amp;#39; a night in a hotel room, I should own the hotel room? If I order a taxi, I should own the taxi? If I ride a bikeshare e-bike across town, I should own the bike? Whether rent is appropriate or exploitative for a certain product or industry is a fair question, but to say renting should not exist as a concept at all for anything just doesn&amp;#39;t work.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48797993&quot; title=&quot;This is just pedantry, and incorrect pedantry at that. BUY does not always mean you gain ownership. You can BUY a license or a haircut and you don&amp;#39;t own anything. Are consumers confused in practice by what happens when they click &amp;#39;Buy&amp;#39; on the playstation store? Does anyone really thing Buy here means they will be able to download the game onto their computer and play it there? Fine, pass a regulation that makes online stores change the word to license or whatever. Will that relieve your sense…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48796348&quot; title=&quot;We rent time at a football field. We buy tickets to watch a single match. There are parallels here to not owning video games. I don’t really understand why one is so heinous. Let’s say there’s a new rule implemented by the NBA that no one likes (similar to a fear of live service games changing). How is that resolved there and why can’t that solution work for video games? I think a big thing we’re currently missing here is something like a community field or park. Why are there no open-source,…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is skepticism regarding whether PC gaming offers a true alternative, as dominant platforms like Steam also prohibit license transfers, leaving DRM-free storefronts like GOG as the only major advocates for genuine ownership &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48796102&quot; title=&quot;Absolutely this. Fifteen years ago World of Warcraft was at its peak.  You had 12 million people paying a monthly fee, plus buying the occasional expansion pack.  No other gaming company had seen reoccurring revenue numbers like that before and it changed the industry.  One aspect of this was that if you stopped paying you lost access to the game. The industry has been looking for the next way to level up this subscription model on gaming.  Battle Passes, Xbox Live, Game Pass, Playstation Plus,…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48796398&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I&amp;#39;m optimistic that the raise in PC gaming will act as a balance for the obvious greed of the consoles. Why? Steam has never done anything to support ownership of games, their policy completely bans transferring licenses or accounts to other people or leaving them to someone when you die.  Their next CEO is someone who has only known extreme wealth their whole life and gets the job because daddy started the company, when has that been a catalyst for societal good? GOG is the only one to have…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.heise.de/en/news/Chat-Control-1-0-EU-Council-forces-messenger-scans-via-fast-track-11353659.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;EU Council forces Chat Control via fast-track&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (heise.de)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48793393&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;407 points · 215 comments · by stavros&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The EU Council is using an expedited procedure to reactivate expired regulations allowing technology companies to voluntarily scan private messages for child abuse material, a move critics claim bypasses democratic oversight and surprises the EU Parliament just before its summer break. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.heise.de/en/news/Chat-Control-1-0-EU-Council-forces-messenger-scans-via-fast-track-11353659.html&quot; title=&quot;Chat Control 1.0: EU Council forces messenger scans via fast-track    Member states reactivate expired chat control regulation. EU Parliament caught off guard before summer break.    [heise+ entdecken](https://www.heise.de/plus/abo?affiliateId=30165&amp;amp;wt_mc=intern.abo.plus.hp_ea_2025.ho_navilink.desktop.desktop)    Suchen[![heise Plus](/icons/svg/logos/svg/heise_plus_blue.svg)![heise Plus](/icons/svg/logos/svg/heise_plus_blue_negativ.svg)Abo](/plus &amp;#39;Jetzt heise+ abonnieren&amp;#39;)    Suchen    * [Alle Magazine…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The EU Council’s fast-tracking of &amp;#34;Chat Control 1.0&amp;#34; allows messaging providers to scan content for harmful material, though users note this is distinct from the more controversial &amp;#34;2.0&amp;#34; proposal that targets end-to-end encryption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48795630&quot; title=&quot;For context, this refers to &amp;#39;Chat Control 1.0&amp;#39;, allowing facebook and other messaging providers to scan chats for harmful content (which they had been temporarily allowed to do by a recently expired law). This is still problematic, but the far more dangerous Chat Control 2.0 that would weaken end-to-end-encrypted messengers like Signal is not being discussed here. Not to diminish the gravity of the new development, but the defeatist &amp;#39;no way to prevent this&amp;#39; narratives that are already popping…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some attribute these persistent surveillance efforts to bureaucratic inertia or existing corporate practices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48795722&quot; title=&quot;Isn&amp;#39;t this something they already do? I would be utterly shocked if facebook et al. were not scanning all of your messages (either in transit or at terminus to get around &amp;#39;E2E&amp;#39; claims).&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48795940&quot; title=&quot;I don’t think it’s a conspiracy or corruption. It’s just design by committee bureaucracy. It always fails into that state.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others allege corruption and a lack of democratic accountability within EU institutions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48795414&quot; title=&quot;The central bank, council, and commission have to get thoroughly investigated. The amount of questionable decisions coming from those three in the recent (15) years is extremely unsettling. The parliament and courts are practically the only institutions preventing things from hitting the fan at this point, and struggling to do so, it seems.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48795596&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;The central bank, council, and commission have to get thoroughly investigated. By WHO?! They are THE (unelected) ruling elite. Who&amp;#39;s gonna prosecute them?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48795566&quot; title=&quot;I’m convinced of widespread corruption here. We need to follow the money. Who is funding and pushing this agenda to blanket spy on all Europeans? I guess my question is rhetorical.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. This has sparked debate over the EU&amp;#39;s governance structure, with some defending the legitimacy of elected officials while others argue the system is failing to represent the public interest &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48795702&quot; title=&quot;They are not unelected. The EU Council is made up of the head of government of each member state. They are all elected. The commissioners are picked by the heads of state (elected) and the EU parliament (also elected). This does not absolve them from wrongdoing, but you should understand where your complaints should be directed at.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48795752&quot; title=&quot;Those narratives pop up from users that have a clear anti-EU bias (and I suspect they might not even be from the EU considering how ignorant they seem to be about how it works, its function ans structure, etc.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48795116&quot; title=&quot;This is democracy manifest. What a joke.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ui.shadcn.com/docs/changelog&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Shadcn/UI now defaults to Base UI instead of Radix&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ui.shadcn.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48791328&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;275 points · 154 comments · by dabinat&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Shadcn/UI has officially made Base UI its default component library, replacing Radix for new projects while maintaining full support and migration tools for existing Radix users. The update also introduces new chat interface components, GitHub-based registries, and a compact design style called Rhea. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ui.shadcn.com/docs/changelog&quot; title=&quot;Title: Changelog    URL Source: https://ui.shadcn.com/docs/changelog    Markdown Content:  ## July 2026 - Base UI as the Default    Starting today, **Base UI is the default component library in shadcn/ui**.    First, a bit of history. When shadcn/ui launched in January 2023, it was built on Radix. At the time, nothing else came close. Unstyled headless components, great APIs, great accessibility, battle-tested in millions of apps.    Fast forward a few years and the same folks who built Radix are building…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion is heavily polarized over the perceived use of AI in the announcement, with some users finding the &amp;#34;Claude voice&amp;#34; distracting and disrespectful to the reader &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792907&quot; title=&quot;It’s getting tiring to hear at this point, but the Claude voice comes through clearly in this post, and it’s a little off-putting. If even an important product release doesn’t warrant full human attention, where will we draw the line?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48795025&quot; title=&quot;It is clearly not effectively communicated if the tool used to write it stamps its signature in such a way that it distracts from the great work they’re doing.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794586&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; respecting the reader When people say LLM slop is disrespecting the reader, I don&amp;#39;t think they are complaining about style.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Others defend the use of LLMs as an efficiency tool for open-source developers, arguing that the content remains clear and that AI assistance is a practical way to manage limited resources &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794245&quot; title=&quot;The post effectively communicated what it needed to.  It seemed both written and structured in a way that was optimized for human consumption. If they used AI to write this and that gave them more time to volunteer their time towards developing this fantastic piece of open source software, then this all seems like a good thing to me.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792917&quot; title=&quot;Serious question, why does it matter to you? Maybe they wrote a draft and reviewed Claude&amp;#39;s writing before publishing. Why are we trying to &amp;#39;call out&amp;#39; when AI is assisting us in our work? This is an open source project, not a F500 company. They have limited resources, maybe English isn&amp;#39;t their first language.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond the prose, the shift toward using AI agents for component upgrades sparked a technical debate on whether this approach is superior to traditional versioning or deterministic codemods &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48791684&quot; title=&quot;For boring applications - do people prefer the copy paste approach of shadcn instead of a traditional ui library like mantine? The copy paste approach may be easily modifiable but creates new problems - ie now there is an upgrade ai agent for something that should just be ticking up a version number.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48791566&quot; title=&quot;Moving away from codemods and towards LLMs doing migration work is an interesting development. Even if they’re more deterministic, I wonder if the days of codemods are numbered.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.acc.org/about-acc/press-releases/2025/03/17/15/35/cannabis-users-face-substantially-higher-risk&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cannabis users face substantially higher risk of heart attack (2025)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (acc.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48793492&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;168 points · &lt;strong&gt;229 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by RickJWagner&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;New research indicates that cannabis users face a significantly higher risk of heart attack, with one study finding that otherwise healthy adults under 50 are over six times more likely to suffer an attack compared to non-users. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.acc.org/about-acc/press-releases/2025/03/17/15/35/cannabis-users-face-substantially-higher-risk&quot; title=&quot;Title: Cannabis Users Face Substantially Higher Risk of Heart Attack - American College of Cardiology    URL Source: https://www.acc.org/about-acc/press-releases/2025/03/17/15/35/cannabis-users-face-substantially-higher-risk    Published Time: Sun, 05 Jul 2026 22:48:49 GMT    Markdown Content:  **Contact:** Nicole Napoli, nnapoli@acc.org,    WASHINGTON (Mar 18, 2025) -    Marijuana is now legal in many places, but is it safe? Two new studies add to mounting evidence that people who use cannabis are more…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely criticize the study for failing to control for critical confounding variables, such as tobacco use, other drug consumption like cocaine, and the specific duration or dosage of cannabis use &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794019&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; researchers were unable to account for several potential confounding factors including the duration and amount of cannabis use or the use of tobacco or other drugs. Personally I&amp;#39;d wager a bet it&amp;#39;s the tobacco and/or smoking that is the harmful part, but it kind of dumbfounds me they failed to account for &amp;#39;details&amp;#39; like &amp;#39;duration and amount of cannabis use&amp;#39;, that feels like a very vital thing to control for. Nothing is good for you in too great amounts, even water, so not taking that into…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794188&quot; title=&quot;Exactly. Being unable to account for this covariate (tobacco use) pretty much invalidates this analysis. The odds ratio for tobacco use is basically the same (3x). Also, title needs a 2025.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794696&quot; title=&quot;Not to mention cocaine.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Many argue that heavy cannabis use may correlate with underlying lifestyle stressors or mental health issues rather than being the primary cause of heart issues &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794417&quot; title=&quot;I wonder about all the confounding effects. In my country (famous for cannabis to be easy to come by (for decades already), and I saw many smoke from age 16 up as I grew up in 90&amp;#39;s, 00&amp;#39;s). I have always felt that the heavy cannabis smokers had something to compensate; stress, unrest, impending depression, friction with parents. It was never the healthy sporty types with fulfilling relationships, good grades or a nice career that smoke cannabis heavily (like daily). Sure, some of those smoked,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794890&quot; title=&quot;The cannabis to cocaine pipeline sadly is real, whether we want to or not. As long as the same people we buy our weed from also have a chance of being the people that have cocaine for you to buy, all that’s left to figure out is the money and the willingness to buy some. (Sadly speaking from experience)&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users share anecdotes of healthy cardiac checkups despite long-term use, others caution that medical clearances are not foolproof and that cannabis—including edibles—can significantly elevate heart rate and blood pressure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794187&quot; title=&quot;Literally just wrote about that: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794178 &amp;gt; I&amp;#39;ve smoked cannabis daily for maybe 15 years [...] Visited a cardiologist like two months ago and have perfectly fine heart despite the smoking.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794621&quot; title=&quot;Edible forms of cannabis raise heart rate and blood pressure substantially as well.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794445&quot; title=&quot;Many people have had cardiologists say they have perfectly fine hearts go on to have heart attacks months later. My brother was one of these people. He was going in for spinal surgery, cardio said his heart was fine. Two weeks after surgery he was short of breath. Turns out he needed a triple bypass. And that was a physical change. Heart attacks happen because of electrocardiac issues as well.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.flipper.net/future-of-flipper-zero-development/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The future of Flipper Zero development&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.flipper.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48796552&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;278 points · 116 comments · by croes&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Flipper Devices has announced it will resume active maintenance of the Flipper Zero firmware by allocating resources to support community contributions. The new development model prioritizes feature requests via GitHub Discussions voting and implements stricter pull request guidelines and mandatory integration testing to ensure system stability. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.flipper.net/future-of-flipper-zero-development/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Future of Flipper Zero Development    URL Source: https://blog.flipper.net/future-of-flipper-zero-development/    Published Time: 2026-07-01T13:49:59.000Z    Markdown Content:  *   [![Image 1: Pavel Zhovner](https://blog.flipper.net/content/images/size/w100/2020/10/9a8180b4-80fa-4c50-9e83-bee59e3bc348-1.png)](https://blog.flipper.net/author/zhovner/)    ![Image 2: The Future of Flipper Zero…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a significant overlap between the cybersecurity community and the furry subculture, with users noting that infosec has historically been a meritocratic space where &amp;#34;uncommon&amp;#34; identities are accepted &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798283&quot; title=&quot;Why does their header image feature multiple furries, one at each station? One making a feature request, another presumably approving a pull request, and a third ostensibly submitting an app? Is the Flipper Zero community tightly intertwined with the furry community? Is this a connection I&amp;#39;ve missed?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798309&quot; title=&quot;It’s definitely a meme if nothing else that the cybersecurity community has a distribution of furries that would not reflect the general population’s.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798444&quot; title=&quot;My hypothesis, based purely on personal experience and what friends have told me. I am not a furry. I feel like infosec was one of the earliest &amp;#39;no one cares who you are if you have skills&amp;#39; user groups. Online, you were just a handle. Man, woman, both, neither, no one knew until if/when you met up IRL. Until then, all you had was your reputation. I think that led to people having a pretty good idea about the attitudes of people they were talking to online, staying away from people who were…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters question the visibility of this subculture in official branding, others defend it as a harmless reflection of the community&amp;#39;s diverse and &amp;#34;weird&amp;#34; nature &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798426&quot; title=&quot;what does it matter to you? honest question. would that impact your technical assessment somehow? do you just want in on some probable joke?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798342&quot; title=&quot;Is there some study to explain why? Do they feel more safer pretending to be human sized...furry animal?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798444&quot; title=&quot;My hypothesis, based purely on personal experience and what friends have told me. I am not a furry. I feel like infosec was one of the earliest &amp;#39;no one cares who you are if you have skills&amp;#39; user groups. Online, you were just a handle. Man, woman, both, neither, no one knew until if/when you met up IRL. Until then, all you had was your reputation. I think that led to people having a pretty good idea about the attitudes of people they were talking to online, staying away from people who were…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond cultural aesthetics, there is sharp criticism regarding the Flipper Zero&amp;#39;s official software ecosystem, with users claiming the company &amp;#34;purged&amp;#34; legitimate pentesting tools and suppressed discussion of superior third-party firmwares &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48797827&quot; title=&quot;Yeah whatever. I abandoned the &amp;#39;official crap&amp;#39; when they purged legit pentesting tools and silenced loads others. Momentum and extreme were so much better, and didn&amp;#39;t play stupid games. They included everything. And if you mention ANY of the alternate firmwares on their discord, and you get banned. Just fuck&amp;#39;em. They may have created good hardware, but their software and discord community just sucked.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48796780&quot; title=&quot;Flipper Zero is one of the handiest little pieces of tech I’ve ever owned. Being able to copy RFID keys is occasionally fantastically useful.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8e2j0j87reo&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Europe&amp;#39;s new climate in seven charts&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792790&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;148 points · &lt;strong&gt;233 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by saikatsg&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Record-breaking heatwaves in June 2026 have shattered temperature records across the UK and Europe, a trend scientists attribute to human-induced climate change and the continent&amp;#39;s rapid warming. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8e2j0j87reo&quot; title=&quot;Title: &amp;#39;Hotter and hotter and hotter&amp;#39; - Europe&amp;#39;s new climate in seven charts    URL Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8e2j0j87reo    Published Time: 2026-07-04T00:57:05.615Z    Markdown Content:  2 days ago    Mark Poynting,Climate reporter,    Becky Dale,Senior data journalist, BBC Verify,    Erwan Rivault,Senior data designer and    Jess Carr,Data designer    ![Image 1: Tino Romano / EPA A construction worker wearing orange hi vis uniform holds a yellow construction helmet and wipes his head in front…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion reflects a deep divide between existential dread regarding heatwaves &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48793385&quot; title=&quot;to me, these heatwaves feel like the start of the end of human existence&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; and a more pragmatic view that climate change represents a shift in agricultural zones rather than the end of humanity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48793496&quot; title=&quot;Nah.  It&amp;#39;s really as simple as this: Southern climates are moving north.  (In the northern hemisphere.)  If you want a vision of the future, consider a New England that looks more like the Southeast. There will be winners and losers.  As climate zones move toward the poles, weather patterns and agricultural viability will shift with them. This will eventually turn current breadbaskets into deserts while warming up northern/southern regions for longer growing seasons. Various regions will cross…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users compare current anxieties to the Cold War &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48793397&quot; title=&quot;People one or two generations before you felt that about the cold war.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that climate change is a permanent, accelerating shift driven by recent surges in global emissions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48793417&quot; title=&quot;I think thats the wrong level of abstraction. The cold war ended, but clima change will not end.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48793624&quot; title=&quot;Keep in mind total emissions grew much much faster in our lifetime (let’s say 1980-2026) than in the prior 200 years, which was before most of the recent huge growth in Chinese and Indian emissions. Also the ocean and arctic were absorbing the majority of the heat. The arctics been going through these heat waves for 10 years, its white albedo decreasing and potentially permafrost melting making more effective emissions now. We must act. Stop eating beef. Stop taking trips if possible. Vote for…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Disagreements persist over the lack of aggressive political action, which commenters attribute to the influence of the wealthy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48793570&quot; title=&quot;Because rich people want more money. They keep saying it&amp;#39;s for the good of humanity and some useful idiots keep repeating that. A more balanced tax policy, regulation of financial markets, incentives to renewals, stopping investment in fossil fuels, increasing energy efficiency, and rewilding could all help, but we won&amp;#39;t do a lick of it, because every single one of those things goes against the billionaires who own the political class.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt; and a general failure of current political structures to handle mass population movements &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48793496&quot; title=&quot;Nah.  It&amp;#39;s really as simple as this: Southern climates are moving north.  (In the northern hemisphere.)  If you want a vision of the future, consider a New England that looks more like the Southeast. There will be winners and losers.  As climate zones move toward the poles, weather patterns and agricultural viability will shift with them. This will eventually turn current breadbaskets into deserts while warming up northern/southern regions for longer growing seasons. Various regions will cross…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dthain.github.io/books/compiler/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction to Compilers and Language Design (2021)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (dthain.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48793454&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;292 points · 48 comments · by AlexeyBrin&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Professor Douglas Thain of the University of Notre Dame offers a free online textbook and accompanying code resources designed to teach undergraduate students how to build a compiler for a C-like language from scratch. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dthain.github.io/books/compiler/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Introduction to Compilers and Language Design    URL Source: https://dthain.github.io/books/compiler/    Markdown Content:  ## Prof. Douglas Thain at Notre Dame    This is a free online textbook: you are welcome to access the chapter PDFs directly below. If you prefer to hold a real book, you can also purchase a hardcover or paperback below. The textbook and materials have been developed by [Prof. Douglas Thain](https://dthain.github.io/books/compiler/dthain.github.io) as part of the CSE 40243…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While commenters admire the technical complexity of compiler engineering &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794375&quot; title=&quot;Sometimes I see people who design languages and build compilers, and I find them truly amazing. I once tried making a language myself because I was curious, but it was so difficult that I just settled for a simple C backend. The people contributing to LLVM probably know everything down to assembly generation.  they&amp;#39;re truly incredible.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, many critique this book for focusing almost exclusively on C-like languages and assembly generation rather than broader language design &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48795604&quot; title=&quot;Just scannning the table of contents and I don&amp;#39;t see any of the major topics of language design. It seems to be more like just &amp;#39;intro to compilers&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794745&quot; title=&quot;it wanders within a tight circle around C and its idiosyncrasies.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48795064&quot; title=&quot;Probably by design. &amp;gt; This book offers a one semester introduction [...] enabling the reader to build a simple compiler that accepts a *C-like language*&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue the title is misleading, suggesting alternatives like *Programming Languages: Application and Interpretation* for those seeking actual design theory &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48795693&quot; title=&quot;Then it is really not about language design... I would rather recommend https://www.plai.org/&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the thread contains a meta-discussion regarding the presence of low-quality, potentially automated &amp;#34;AI slop&amp;#34; comments in technical forums &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794338&quot; title=&quot;Love such topics and articles in midst of AI topics/noise.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794934&quot; title=&quot;The best part of the blind AI hatred is you can call literally anything AI slop without presenting evidence and the anti-slop loyalists will hate it without any evidence. I do value both correct high quality AI usage and non-AI works, would be nice if we could have a bar for the AI stuff that makes sense instead of dismissing peoples work blindly.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48795125&quot; title=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=swordlucky666 - Sort of embarrassing that anyone vouched for this comment. Reading their history, they copy/paste the same comment or use an autogenerator (probably not an LLM, that&amp;#39;d produce better results) to generate comments like this one. Here&amp;#39;s a comical one: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48445529 &amp;gt; The discussion on Spanish traders set the standa raises interesting points. In practical applications, the key challenge is balancing performance…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jacob.gold/posts/programmers-need-to-start-meditating-now/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Programmers need to start meditating&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jacob.gold)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792080&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;127 points · &lt;strong&gt;145 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by enz&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As AI-driven productivity increases context switching and reduces time spent in a flow state, programmers should adopt meditation to replicate the mental stillness previously found in deep coding. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jacob.gold/posts/programmers-need-to-start-meditating-now/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Programmers need to start meditating now    URL Source: https://jacob.gold/posts/programmers-need-to-start-meditating-now/    Published Time: 2026-07-04T08:49:38-07:00    Markdown Content:  For over 20 years, the meditative focus of programming has been one of the best parts of my job.    Every week I’d spend countless hours in a [flow state](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flow_(psychology)), which [quiets](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.019) the [default mode…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The shift toward AI-driven &amp;#34;vibe coding&amp;#34; has introduced a steady stream of medium-level stress and constant task-switching that many developers find draining and devoid of the detailed work they love &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792648&quot; title=&quot;I have certainly noticed my stress skyrocket in this new mode of working. I was used to getting a lot done very quickly, with intense pockets of work followed downtime. Now it feels more like a steady stream of medium stress, and there is no opportunity to stop or drop the thread. I must admit, if this is the new way of doing software development (eg: not actually programming but working with LLMs) I am not going to stick around for that long. It&amp;#39;s not what I fell on love with, it&amp;#39;s not what I…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792710&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, same thoughts. And this industry is becoming so volatile, I&amp;#39;m not sure what will happen tomorrow. I mean it&amp;#39;s highly unlikely that AI will replace developers at least in the next 10 years, but I&amp;#39;m not sure what will &amp;#39;software developer&amp;#39; become. Certain people love to work with details. If AI is taking away this joy, I&amp;#39;ll rather retire as early as possible from this volatile industry.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792723&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; I’m clearly much more productive now. I’m doing five things at once very effectively, switching between multiple agent sessions from morning to night. Joel Spolsky disagrees here: https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2001/02/12/human-task-switche...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that meditation is a necessary tool to build focus and manage this new cognitive load &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792698&quot; title=&quot;Meditation - «getting used to» A most elementary form of meditation, is getting used to placing your attention on a sensation and keeping it anchored there - even when other sensations or thoughts arise. Following the breath- place your awareness, your attention, on the sensation of air passing through your nostrils. Count one inbreath and outbreath cycle as «1», and count until 10 or 21. Decide before you start, how many repetitions of 10 or 21 you will do. If at any point your attention has…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48793316&quot; title=&quot;It being boring is part of the point - normally your brain is constantly stimulated so it does indeed feel strange and uncomfortable when that stimulus is taken away. Pushing through that is what leads to progress. Meditation is like physical exercise, it&amp;#39;s not exactly &amp;#39;fun&amp;#39; at the time, you sort of have to learn to enjoy it, but it&amp;#39;s never easy. Like exercise the real reward is backloaded&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others criticize the prescriptive nature of the advice, noting that meditation can be ineffective or even anxiety-inducing for certain individuals, particularly those with ADHD &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792810&quot; title=&quot;This isn&amp;#39;t the worst article, and it&amp;#39;s triggered a decent amount of discussion (despite being very short). However, I really dislike &amp;#39;What you&amp;#39;re doing wrong/failing to do&amp;#39; titles. They are intended to trigger anxiety, which is manipulative and (in this case) precisely contradicts the concern the author is purporting to have for the rest of us. On the subject: some people find meditation very helpful, others find it a net negative, or useless, or impossible to do. So a categorical &amp;#39;you should…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48793042&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; On the subject: some people find meditation very helpful, others find it a net negative, or useless, or impossible to do. So a categorical &amp;#39;you should do this&amp;#39; isn&amp;#39;t correct or particularly helpful. Try it, if it works for you, great; but don&amp;#39;t put it about that people who aren&amp;#39;t doing it are being negligent in some way Absolutely. I&amp;#39;ve tried mediation in many situations and some classes but it&amp;#39;s just not for me. My ADHD brain doesn&amp;#39;t work that way. It&amp;#39;s painfully boring and not relaxing at…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. As a result, some developers are considering retiring early or moving into safety-critical embedded systems where AI has yet to replace rigorous, manual verification &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792710&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, same thoughts. And this industry is becoming so volatile, I&amp;#39;m not sure what will happen tomorrow. I mean it&amp;#39;s highly unlikely that AI will replace developers at least in the next 10 years, but I&amp;#39;m not sure what will &amp;#39;software developer&amp;#39; become. Certain people love to work with details. If AI is taking away this joy, I&amp;#39;ll rather retire as early as possible from this volatile industry.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48793070&quot; title=&quot;One idea to consider might be going into safety critical embedded work (e.g. brake controllers, critical systems for airplanes/trains, medical devices, some industrial systems, ...). AI hasn&amp;#39;t penetrated much here yet. It isn&amp;#39;t at all clear how or if you would be able to certify the process for example. That might change with time, but for now, all I see AI used for is additional code review and side scripts/tooling that don&amp;#39;t need to be safety rated. Of course, that might mean entirely…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792787&quot; title=&quot;Maybe we just aren&amp;#39;t far enough in the vibe coding side of things and there are still too many people in the industry who still pay attention to details, so no major catastrophes haven&amp;#39;t happened yet because of vibe coding. So the people who pay attention to details are still carrying their organizations, but I do wonder how long it is going to be sustainable. When it comes to joy killers because of AI, then it is dismal how plagiarism (going by the definition of &amp;#39;presenting someone else&amp;#39;s work…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://notesbylex.com/completing-a-computer-science-degree-on-coursera&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Completing a computer science degree on Coursera&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (notesbylex.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798061&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;156 points · 110 comments · by lexandstuff&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A software veteran completed a Bachelor’s in Computer Science from the University of London via Coursera in 3.5 years while working full-time. The remote program cost approximately £17,000 and utilized performance-based admission, though the author noted challenges with slow grading and rigorous proctored exams. &lt;a href=&quot;https://notesbylex.com/completing-a-computer-science-degree-on-coursera&quot; title=&quot;Title: Completing A Computer Science Degree On Coursera    URL Source: https://notesbylex.com/completing-a-computer-science-degree-on-coursera    Markdown Content:  In September 2022, I impulsively signed up for a [Bachelor&amp;#39;s Degree in Computer Science](https://www.coursera.org/degrees/bachelor-of-science-computer-science-london) after seeing an ad for it on Coursera. Getting a degree had been on my mind for quite some time, after a long career without one, but I wasn&amp;#39;t sure how to go about it. And…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The value of a traditional computer science degree is highly contested, with some arguing that the curriculum is a &amp;#34;waste of time&amp;#34; compared to on-the-job learning and building a portfolio &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798483&quot; title=&quot;I got a Bachelor, Master, and PhD in Computer Science, with a total of 11 years of education. It&amp;#39;s the biggest waste of time of my entire life. As I progress in my professional career I&amp;#39;m more convinced that pretty much everything in tech is on-the-job learning, and universities are little more than a social club. Nowadays you can learn everything you do at university and far more online and for free. Universities (elite ones particularly) still give you credentials that have some value getting…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics suggest that CS degrees are often an inefficient proxy for testing discipline, as the industry lacks the rigorous standards of other engineering fields &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798814&quot; title=&quot;Computer science is a weird degree because it was meant to produce computer scientists. Theory of computability, graph theory, discrete math, formal logic, etc. But the world just doesn&amp;#39;t need as many computer scientists as it needs people who know JavaScript. Over time, many CS degrees shifted toward producing software engineers, and it sounds like this person&amp;#39;s experience was closer to that. But the problem is that as an engineering discipline, software engineering is just profoundly…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798939&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; But the problem is that as an engineering discipline, software engineering is just profoundly underwhelming. There are basically no universally-respected design best practices, no governing bodies, no calculations of safety limits, no nothing. I somewhat disagree: there exist a lot of deep questions in software engineering, and there do exist some (very, very partial) answers. The problem rather is that most people don&amp;#39;t want to listen to and/or do deep literature research about the few…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some defend the PhD as a unique exercise in research independence and grit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48799629&quot; title=&quot;I won&amp;#39;t try and argue the merits of Bachelor&amp;#39;s and Masters. But if you honestly believe that you can pick up the same experience from PhD on the job, then is seems like you learned little from that PhD that you were supposed to and your supervisor failed you. PhD is not about learning content. It&amp;#39;s about picking up research independence, confidence, and a strong capacity for critique. It is supposed to be suffering of a special kind, an experience in grinding and radical unproductivity when the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others dismiss this as &amp;#34;virtue signaling,&amp;#34; claiming modern academia has devolved into a cycle of pumping out questionable papers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48799752&quot; title=&quot;do you have a phd? did you get it in the last 10 years? because i have one as well and 100% agree with op - it was worthless. and i got mine from a &amp;#39;world class&amp;#39; school too (US T10). &amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s about picking up research independence, confidence, and a strong capacity for critique. lolol maybe in the days of yore. today it&amp;#39;s about pumping out questionable papers that your advisor tells you to pump out and targeting the right conference. &amp;gt; It is supposed to be suffering of a special kind are you also…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these criticisms, elite credentials still hold significant weight for networking and hiring, though self-motivated learners are increasingly seen as a &amp;#34;green flag&amp;#34; by some employers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798483&quot; title=&quot;I got a Bachelor, Master, and PhD in Computer Science, with a total of 11 years of education. It&amp;#39;s the biggest waste of time of my entire life. As I progress in my professional career I&amp;#39;m more convinced that pretty much everything in tech is on-the-job learning, and universities are little more than a social club. Nowadays you can learn everything you do at university and far more online and for free. Universities (elite ones particularly) still give you credentials that have some value getting…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798430&quot; title=&quot;I always saw motivated people taking the &amp;#39;road less travelled&amp;#39; as a HUGE green flag.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798473&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s a stark difference between self motivated curious people and certification collectors even though on the surface they can look very similar.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://intextbooks.science.uu.nl/workshop2026/files/itb26_s1s2.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;New AI tutor achieves 0.71-1.30 SD effect size in Dartmouth course [pdf]&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (intextbooks.science.uu.nl)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48796817&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;150 points · 90 comments · by jonahbard&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dartmouth researchers found that students using Phosphor, an AI-integrated digital textbook, achieved final exam gains between 0.71 and 1.30 standard deviations, with performance improvements specifically linked to AI-graded constructed-response questions rather than multiple-choice quizzes. &lt;a href=&quot;https://intextbooks.science.uu.nl/workshop2026/files/itb26_s1s2.pdf&quot; title=&quot;Title: Balancing Efficacy and Engagement in Interactive Texts    URL Source: https://intextbooks.science.uu.nl/workshop2026/files/itb26_s1s2.pdf    Published Time: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 09:22:09 GMT    Number of Pages: 7    Markdown Content:  # Balancing Efficacy and Engagement in Interactive Texts     Jonah Bard 1    &amp;gt; 1    Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA     Abstract     We introduce Phosphor, a digital learning platform that integrates LLM-graded formative assessment directly into instructional content,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some see the study as confirmation that AI-driven, individually paced learning is an obviously superior educational tool &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48797292&quot; title=&quot;Shocking that a well executed AI tutor improves outcomes. Hasn&amp;#39;t computer assisted interactive learning already been proven for years? Why does there seem to be so much skepticism about enhancing it with AI? Is this just something like, astoundingly slow adoption or poor execution? Being held back by paper textbook makers? Teachers unions dragging their feet? How can interactive AI driven individually paced learning _not_ be obviously dramatically more effective?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, skeptics argue the reported 0.71–1.30 SD improvement may be inflated by novelty, lack of randomized trials, or potential overlap between the AI materials and exam questions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48797697&quot; title=&quot;I am somewhat skeptical of this. First, the headline result of 0.7*sigma improvement is the output of a statistical based on lessons/reviews they engaged with and their mid-term score, with that shift being for &amp;#39;full engagement&amp;#39;. Based on their tables something like ~16 students (11% of the group) actually reached that level of engagement Second, trying to incorporate past grades into their modelling is not a substitute for a randomized trial. Third, the headline engagement number of 90% is for…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters envision a future where AI tutors integrate with physical classroom tools to minimize screen time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48797250&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m on record saying that a system like this with some extra hardware (i.e. a way for the LLM to have live understanding of the student&amp;#39;s paper notebook or handout which are being written in with a plain old pencil) combines the best of both worlds - individual tutoring with approximately zero screen time which scales linearly with the number of students. The role of the teacher or professor then becomes a manager of the student - agentic tutor pairs, a referee when the student and model…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; and automate the &amp;#34;cumbersome&amp;#34; process of creating spaced repetition cards &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48797475&quot; title=&quot;I would add that somewhere in there should be a spaced repetition algorithm. Spaced repetition is very effective, but it&amp;#39;s really really clunky to use. My unpopular opinion is that we all have Stockholm syndrome when it comes to creating &amp;#39;cards&amp;#39;, and people talk about how valuable creating cards is; but I think it stucks, it takes a lot of time. If AI is already teaching me math (let&amp;#39;s say), it would be nice to tell the AI/app &amp;#39;quiz me on this periodically&amp;#39;, and then the AI makes up a fresh…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48797700&quot; title=&quot;Again, I really think this is a viewpoint we&amp;#39;ve talked ourselves into to help us feel better about how cumbersome creating the cards are. I&amp;#39;m willing to grant that there is some value in choosing what to put in the cards, but most of the awkwardness around making cards is UI related. Nobody creates cards on their phone, or while they&amp;#39;re walking (AI could do both of these) - people create cards sitting at their computer (like cavemen!) usually clicking through a clunky UI and managing thousands…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. However, there is disagreement over whether automating card creation is beneficial, as some argue the manual effort of organizing study materials is a vital part of the learning process &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48797516&quot; title=&quot;But the very act of making and organizing your card deck is part of the SRS! It “sucks” because you get no dopamine hit from a fresh desk, as the reward system is not yet in place.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48797873&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Nobody creates cards on their phone, or while they&amp;#39;re walking Wait, when are you doing it then? No wonder you think it sucks! Adopt some modern tools, yo. Use Anki, or vibe code your own app.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.starringthecomputer.com/computers.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Starring the Computer&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (starringthecomputer.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48796093&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;191 points · 44 comments · by gitowiec&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Starring the Computer is a comprehensive database that tracks and catalogs the appearances of real-life computers and vintage hardware in movies and television shows, ranging from early mainframes to modern laptops. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.starringthecomputer.com/computers.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Starring the Computer    URL Source: https://www.starringthecomputer.com/computers.html    Markdown Content:  [skip navigation](https://www.starringthecomputer.com/computers.html#content) 0 | [A](https://www.starringthecomputer.com/computers.html#Acer) | [B](https://www.starringthecomputer.com/computers.html#Bendix) | [C](https://www.starringthecomputer.com/computers.html#Canon) | [D](https://www.starringthecomputer.com/computers.html#DAP%20) |…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users discussed various instances of computers in media, noting the surprising absence of Cray supercomputers on the list &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48796374&quot; title=&quot;No Cray appearances?  Surprising.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; and sharing anecdotes about the use of NeXT Cubes in Madonna’s &amp;#34;Rain&amp;#34; music video &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48796262&quot; title=&quot;While not a movie, a bunch of NeXT Cubes (at least the monitors) were used in a Madonna video --- apparently some production company got a good deal on machines intended for Japan (hence the katakana interface)&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48796408&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;Rain&amp;#39; (1993) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15kWlTrpt5k&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical observations included a correction regarding assembly code in *Westworld* (1973), which predated the 6502 processor &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48799135&quot; title=&quot;Ha! A couple decades ago I saw the original Westworld, spotted some assembly, and thought it looked like 6502/Apple II code, so I assumed that was “probably” it and thought I was a clever nerd. Now I check this list and discovered it wasn’t 6502, and then realized the 6502 (1975) didn’t exist at the time the movie was shot (1973). Reviewed some scenes just now on YouTube and I can see it doesn’t look like 6502 code at all. It does look like the assembly might be the code behind some of the…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, and the low-budget use of CRT TVs with paper printouts in *King of Queens* &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48796505&quot; title=&quot;Fun Fact: in king of queens, most of the pcs (for example airport episode with doug&amp;#39;s parents) are just RCT tvs with paper printout of a screen taped over it.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. The thread also touched on the aesthetic appeal of 1980s hardware, with users expressing interest in modern retro-styled PC cases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48799745&quot; title=&quot;What computers available today look interesting enough that they will show up in movies next year? Clicking through random computers I think the 80’s had a lot of really beautiful hardware. I think it might be fun to buy an IBM PS/2 case and try to put modern hardware inside. I’d love to have that on my desk. Come to think of it, there must be companies making retro-looking cases…. If you search for retro computer case you get a bunch of boring 90’s towers. Where’s the fun stuff?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://iamwillwang.com/notes/has-not-been-viewed-much/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Has_not_been_viewed_much&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (iamwillwang.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48799155&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;175 points · 45 comments · by wxw&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Art Institute of Chicago’s API includes a specific data field to identify artworks that have received fewer than 200 website views since 2010. &lt;a href=&quot;https://iamwillwang.com/notes/has-not-been-viewed-much/&quot; title=&quot;Title: has_not_been_viewed_much — Will W.    URL Source: https://iamwillwang.com/notes/has-not-been-viewed-much/    Markdown Content:  April 14, 2026  The [Art Institute of Chicago&amp;#39;s API](https://api.artic.edu/docs/) includes a `has_not_been_viewed_much`[field](https://api.artic.edu/docs/#artworks-2) on artwork. It&amp;#39;s a boolean that describes whether an art piece hasn&amp;#39;t been visited on their website very much.    More specifically, per the [source…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users find the &amp;#34;Has_not_been_viewed_much&amp;#34; project addictive, comparing the experience to &amp;#34;dopamine feeding&amp;#34; and noting how it mirrors the charm of discovering obscure library books or zero-play songs on platforms like Forgotify &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48799768&quot; title=&quot;I used to borrow the books which had &amp;#39;to be disposed if not lent in the next 3 months&amp;#39; slip in them. Never regretted reading them. The best one included a very odd short story by Flann OBrien about a carpenter who walls himself inside the oak panelling of a build he is working on, and a woman convinced Sago farming will cure Ireland&amp;#39;s famine.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48800175&quot; title=&quot;This site is vaguely addictive in a dopamine feeding sense. What will the next image be? ...One more click won&amp;#39;t hurt... :-)&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48799803&quot; title=&quot;There used to be a site called Forgotify that would only play songs from Spotify that had zero listens. So each song played, of course, removed that song from the set that could ever be played by Forgotify. Doesn&amp;#39;t look like it&amp;#39;s around any more, sadly.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some appreciate the beauty of specific artworks, others observe significant color variations across different digital archives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48800379&quot; title=&quot;I thought this was lovely, and was surprised by the date: https://www.artic.edu/artworks/196937/summer-moon-at-miyajim...&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48800969&quot; title=&quot;The colors look so different here: https://nipponprints.com/images/tsuchiya-koitsu/summer-moon-... (non-deeplink: https://nipponprints.com/tsuchiya-koitsu/summer-moon-at-miya... )&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a shared concern that the site&amp;#39;s popularity might eventually &amp;#34;ruin&amp;#34; its own metric by inflating the view counts of the very items it aims to highlight &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48799376&quot; title=&quot;How many of these images are there? I cycled through a few and ended up hitting at least one duplicate [1] that I do actually enjoy (but I can&amp;#39;t find the name of it now that I refreshed the page, I know it had the verrazzano narrows bridge in the title) Is there a chance a site like this could ruin their metric by inflating all the views for these lowest viewed items? Or do these not count? [1] https://www.artic.edu/iiif/2/67395c18-c83c-865f-b0db-4736574...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48799511&quot; title=&quot;Cool project, it&amp;#39;s actually a shame if it gets popular enough then it won&amp;#39;t return anything&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_penis_rule&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Small Penis Rule&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (en.wikipedia.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48797015&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;138 points · 73 comments · by chistev&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#34;small penis rule&amp;#34; is a legal strategy where authors give unflattering characters small genitalia to deter real-life inspirations from filing libel lawsuits, as doing so would require them to publicly associate themselves with the embarrassing trait. However, legal experts question its actual effectiveness in court. &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_penis_rule&quot; title=&quot;Title: Small penis rule    URL Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_penis_rule    Published Time: 2006-12-24T22:14:59Z    Markdown Content:  You deserve an explanation, so please don&amp;#39;t skip this 1-minute read. It&amp;#39;s Monday, July 6, and you only had a small chance of seeing our message. This year, Wikipedia has seen fewer visitors and fewer new supporters, so your visit today means a lot. We hope that Wikipedia has given you at least $2.75 of knowledge recently. If everyone who finds Wikipedia…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#34;Small Penis Rule&amp;#34; is discussed as a legal strategy where authors attribute embarrassing, low-status traits to characters to prevent real-life counterparts from claiming the portrayal is &amp;#34;of and concerning&amp;#34; them &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48797448&quot; title=&quot;Sigh. Reductionist thinking again. Yes, of course, if you literally say “small penis” the plaintiff would rightfully cite this history. But it’s not meant to be taken literally, like those are magic words. You say “he failed upwards, funded by family wealth and connections, despite everyone thinking he was an idiot who could barely string a sentence together” The point is to emphasize, even exaggerate, low-status negative qualities.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters noted that while this tactic relies on a plaintiff&amp;#39;s reluctance to admit to such traits in court, some individuals might still pursue litigation if the financial stakes are high enough &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48797762&quot; title=&quot;If you accuse someone (not me) of having a small penis (I don&amp;#39;t) they (not me) don&amp;#39;t have to show that they (not me) have a large penis (like me). Just the accusation they made (to you, not me) is slander enough. But I&amp;#39;d gladly drop-trousers in a court.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48797811&quot; title=&quot;Then again, money. &amp;gt; A jury in New Mexico awarded $412 million to a man who sued over what he said were unnecessary erectile dysfunction shots that decimated his penis On the one hand, now you&amp;#39;re famous for having a dick that doesn&amp;#39;t work, on the other hand, $412 million. https://amp.sacbee.com/news/nation-world/national/article296...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The thread also explores similar &amp;#34;game theory&amp;#34; tricks in law, such as leaving a small inheritance to prevent a will from being contested &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798171&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m always fascinated by these tricks of game theory. e.g. in business school, the dean of the undergraduate school had this story: &amp;#39;When I was a practicing lawyer working on wills and estates, people would often ask me to cut someone completely out of their will. I would always say that a better option was to write something like &amp;#39;To my daughter Susan, I leave $1,000. She always said that she wanted to be financially independent from me so this is an amount to show her I lover her.&amp;#39; Clients…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, and debates whether certain fictional groups like the Ferengi were intended as specific ethnic caricatures or broader critiques of capitalism &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48797894&quot; title=&quot;A Jewish comedian made a joke about how jews (only in the US*) were offended that Ferengi in Star Trek were based on them - &amp;#39;why would we assume these ugly greedy people are _us_?&amp;#39; *Outside the US, it looks like the Ferengi are mocking American capitalist culture.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798090&quot; title=&quot;Is it true that the Ferengi were based on Jews? I suspected so, but then I also considered they may have been influenced by the Chinese.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://craigmod.com/essays/fast_software/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Fast Software, the Best Software (2019)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (craigmod.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792008&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;133 points · 77 comments · by ustad&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This essay argues that speed is the most vital yet undervalued asset in software, serving as a proxy for engineering quality, reliability, and user trust. By comparing tools like nvALT and Figma to bloated applications like Photoshop, the author posits that fast software enables creative flow and tactile delight. &lt;a href=&quot;https://craigmod.com/essays/fast_software/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Fast Software, the Best Software    URL Source: https://craigmod.com/essays/fast_software/    Markdown Content:  I love _fast_ software. That is, software speedy both in function and interface. Software with minimal to no lag between wanting to activate or manipulate something and the thing happening. Lightness.    Software that’s speedy usually means it’s focused. Like a good tool, it often means that it’s simple, but that’s not necessarily true. Speed in software is probably the most…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a deep frustration with modern software bloat, specifically citing the &amp;#34;floaty delay&amp;#34; and lag in Windows Explorer as an example of poor architecture failing modern hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48793494&quot; title=&quot;I run headless Alpine Linux (a minimal distro) in my homelab and it’s fast AF. The lag in Windows Explorer is sad when something like cd folder/folder is instant in Linux.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48793966&quot; title=&quot;I really don&amp;#39;t understand how you can even create software that feels as bad to use as Windows Explorer.  It&amp;#39;s like it&amp;#39;s barely attached to reality.  There&amp;#39;s this weird floaty delay in everything.  You copy a file, or did you?  You&amp;#39;re not sure.  It hasn&amp;#39;t updated yet.   Oh, now the copy dialog appears with this progress bar that isn&amp;#39;t showing progress.  The dialog just sits there.  Is something happening?  I don&amp;#39;t know.  Many seconds later the dialog closes.  But it hasn&amp;#39;t showed up in the…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that the &amp;#34;best&amp;#34; software is actually no software at all &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792942&quot; title=&quot;No, no software is the best software. BTW, the title should say &amp;#39;(2019)&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48793432&quot; title=&quot;No code is faster than no code&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others emphasize that true speed stems from simplicity, which often aligns better with correctness than complex optimization &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48795248&quot; title=&quot;If the software is fast as a byproduct of being simple, that tends to align with correctness. If it is fast because it is optimized, then that does not align with correctness, because optimizing something that works only adds risk.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. For users seeking performance, participants recommend offline-first alternatives like Organic Maps, though they debate whether OpenStreetMap data can match Google Maps&amp;#39; routing and real-time traffic accuracy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48793684&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Google Maps has gotten so slow When it comes to navigating (except public transit), hiking, and route building, Organic Maps[1] is very good. OSM data and offline-first is the way forward for detailed and _fast_ map experience. For cycling route building I have to mention BRouter[2], which allows you to write a custom cost function that is used to tweak your route preferences. [1]: https://organicmaps.app/ [2]: https://brouter.de/brouter/index.html&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794722&quot; title=&quot;I remember an engineer I talked to recently saying that OSM didn&amp;#39;t have sufficiently up-to-date data for their routing use case -- new roads, closed roads, traffic data, etc. Is that the case?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48795255&quot; title=&quot;No. It&amp;#39;s their route function which sucks compared to Google maps. Their data is better and newer.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://phosh.mobi/releases/rel-0.56.0/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Phosh 0.56.0&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (phosh.mobi)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794179&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;139 points · 61 comments · by edward&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Phosh 0.56.0 has been released, introducing a top-bar load meter, atomic OS update support for immutable distributions, per-app keyboard layouts, and various stability improvements across its mobile graphical shell and Wayland compositor. &lt;a href=&quot;https://phosh.mobi/releases/rel-0.56.0/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Phosh 0.56.0    URL Source: https://phosh.mobi/releases/rel-0.56.0/    Published Time: 2026-07-05T11:02:01+02:00    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: Featured img](https://phosh.mobi/releases/rel-0.56.0/phosh-release-0.56.0.png)    ## Phosh 0.56.0 [Link to heading](https://phosh.mobi/releases/rel-0.56.0/#phosh-0560)    A new major release of Phosh is out. See below for a list of changes across individual components:    ## Core components [Link to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide over Phosh’s reliance on GNOME components, with critics arguing that such a heavy stack is unsuitable for power-constrained mobile devices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794370&quot; title=&quot;Seemed interesting until I read that Phosh pulls in GNOME - gnome-settings, gnome-session etc. Seems like a very strange bundle to bring in for an extremely power constrained device, where every % of increased battery drain is noticed by the user&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794567&quot; title=&quot;Gnomes&amp;#39; a massive memory hog I was looking at this and thinking maybe it would improve a cheap android phone. But now I know it&amp;#39;s running gnome I won&amp;#39;t even consider trying&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest minimal alternatives like SXMO for better efficiency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794734&quot; title=&quot;SXMO is pretty minimal in that regard, but it doesn&amp;#39;t force you to use the touchscreen. Can also navigate through menus via the volume buttons...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48795352&quot; title=&quot;Yes and no, SXMO will work without hardware acceleration, I&amp;#39;ve not tried but I doubt that Android will. Additionally, minimum requirements of Android 17 are way above what SXMO allows. With Phosh you would have a point but SXMO is lighter than a modern Android.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that any Linux-based mobile OS lacks the critical power-management features, such as cooperative program suspension, perfected by Android over decades &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794523&quot; title=&quot;Why? What&amp;#39;s particularly heavy in these gnome tools? Like the particular programs are no issue, but the whole UNIX-userspace as  done in the mainframe era and still is. Like you definitely need cooperative program suspend/resume like on Android for any kind of sane battery life, but that&amp;#39;s unfortunately completely missing in case of GNU/Linux.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794823&quot; title=&quot;Even that will be a massive energy vampire compared to android, that had top notch engineers working on it for close to 2 decades...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond technical performance, users identify missing &amp;#34;quality of life&amp;#34; features like tap-to-pay, camera quality, and banking app support as the primary barriers to mainstream adoption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48794580&quot; title=&quot;Linux has long been the most practical laptop OS for me, but I can&amp;#39;t see it ever being competitive with mobile OSes, and that&amp;#39;s coming from someone who wants it to succeed (I&amp;#39;ve installed postmarketOS on a OP6T). I just don&amp;#39;t see how it will overcome the various issues (app support, tap-to-pay, camera quality, etc).&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48795045&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve never understood tap-to-pay being a dealbreaker issue. It takes me just as long to pull out my credit card as it does to pull out my phone, and you can use them on the exact same terminals. App support and camera quality I can understand more. I&amp;#39;m on a Linux phone using Phosh (FLX1s), and there&amp;#39;s Android app compatibility, but it is a little rough (and of course things that rely on Play Integrity won&amp;#39;t work). I&amp;#39;ve managed to avoid tying myself to anything that requires Google for now, but…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48795054&quot; title=&quot;The main issue is lack of banking app support for me. Without that (which the banks will never allow) you would always need two phones.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://homegames.io&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Homegames. An open-source game platform I&amp;#39;ve been making for 8 years&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (homegames.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798153&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;128 points · 35 comments · by homegamesjoseph&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Homegames is a new open-source platform featuring simple JavaScript games, an in-browser editor for creating and publishing titles, and fully accessible source code for every game. &lt;a href=&quot;https://homegames.io&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;amp;#x27;m making a platform for simple open source games you can play anywhere.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Games are all just JavaScript classes and you can read the source of every game on the platform.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;I started working on initial &amp;amp;quot;games&amp;amp;quot; (mostly rendering tests) in 2018 and eventually built all of the platform stuff around it to make it easy to share games.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;There&amp;amp;#x27;s also an in-browser editor available for you to make and publish games all from the browser.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Would love some feedback on the games and…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Homegames is an open-source platform that enables instant multiplayer by running game logic server-side while clients handle rendering and input &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798727&quot; title=&quot;One thing I forgot to mention is all of these games run server side and thin clients just render and send input back to the server. So a game session needs to exist for the back and forth communication to work. Theoretically you could do this all client side too, but that would remove the magic of every game getting multiplayer for free&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798884&quot; title=&quot;I forgot to mention this in the post, but the games themselves run on the server. This gives every game multiplayer for free out of the box, and clients just read the server state and send back input. The idea is that you could use a browser or custom client or whatever to connect to a game server&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While users praised the creator&amp;#39;s eight-year dedication and the project&amp;#39;s inspirational value, many reported technical issues, including &amp;#34;too many requests&amp;#34; errors and immediate disconnections &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798485&quot; title=&quot;Nice idea. I found a couple of interesting games on this. Thanks for sharing! Cool that you haven&amp;#39;t stopped working on this project after that long time. It gives me inspiration to work on my projects which I can&amp;#39;t find time to finish.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798853&quot; title=&quot;Could not play any of the games - too many requests errors. Why do they need &amp;#39;sessions&amp;#39;, are they not running client-side?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48799009&quot; title=&quot;I like the concept and tried to play some games by starting or joining sessions, either nothing happened or I got disconnected straight away? Anyway nice concept. I’m also making web games (see my post history) so if anyone wanted to connect and discuss, send me an email (in profile too)&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters suggested that a hybrid architecture allowing for client-side simulations could provide a more robust single-player experience and reduce server dependency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798410&quot; title=&quot;Does everything need a &amp;#39;session&amp;#39;? Is it possible to have fully static games/exports?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48798890&quot; title=&quot;If you architect your protocol cleanly, you should be able to run the simulation client side too without much effort (certainly the web platform has everything you&amp;#39;d need). This is how modern game engines do it, it goes back to the Quake VM and probably beyond. You&amp;#39;d still get multiplayer &amp;#39;for free&amp;#39;, but it could be turned on and off. You could do it with zero code change for the actual games, they don&amp;#39;t have to know. It seems some of the games could do with a singleplayer mode that doesn&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://pluralistic.net/2026/06/27/zuckerstreisand-2/#autodisparagement&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Zuckerberg&amp;#39;s Increasingly Bizarre War on Whistleblowers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (pluralistic.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48795368&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;123 points · 17 comments · by deely3&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meta whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams has sued to invalidate her nondisclosure agreement after the company sought millions in damages and attempted to silence her through arbitration, even following her silent public appearances intended to comply with strict gag orders. &lt;a href=&quot;https://pluralistic.net/2026/06/27/zuckerstreisand-2/#autodisparagement&quot; title=&quot;Title: Daily links from Cory Doctorow    URL Source: https://pluralistic.net/2026/06/27/zuckerstreisand-2/    Markdown Content:  [![Image 1](https://i0.wp.com/craphound.com/images/27Jun2026.jpg?w=840&amp;amp;ssl=1)](https://pluralistic.net/2026/06/27/zuckerstreisand/)    ## Today&amp;#39;s links    *   [Zuckerberg&amp;#39;s increasingly bizarre war on whistleblowers](https://pluralistic.net/2026/06/27/zuckerstreisand/#autodisparagement): Under no circumstances should you rush out and read the book that prompted Mark Zuckerberg…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters characterize Meta’s legal actions against whistleblowers as &amp;#34;weirdly petty&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;farcical,&amp;#34; suggesting the company&amp;#39;s goal is to intimidate other employees rather than protect a reputation that is already widely tarnished &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48796642&quot; title=&quot;OK it took a while to get to the point, but Zuck claiming that Wynn-Williams sitting silently on stage during a panel constitutes &amp;#39;disparagement&amp;#39; is farcical if not straight-up evil&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48797045&quot; title=&quot;It looks weirdly petty that they are going after her. Everyone knows that Meta is a shitty place to work. There have already been countless articles. Their reputation as an employer is almost Amazon-tier. Is there much point in trying to silence one person?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48797181&quot; title=&quot;No, there&amp;#39;s really not. That&amp;#39;s why it&amp;#39;s self-evident to me that their goal is to send a message to any other employee thinking about following her lead&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate whether Mark Zuckerberg’s financial success qualifies as brilliance or merely sociopathic ruthlessness, others focus on systemic solutions like stronger anti-trust enforcement and reforming forced arbitration laws &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48796943&quot; title=&quot;In my opinion, most iltra rivh get to where they are by being narcissictic sociopaths. But zuckerberg really takes the cake. Remember when he thought a makeover and singing listens would be enough to make him president? Mans actually deranged. Brilliant, but actually crazy&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48796967&quot; title=&quot;How is he brilliant?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48796047&quot; title=&quot;Real anti-trust enforcement could help with American&amp;#39;s problems.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48796734&quot; title=&quot;As well as laws that make forced arbitration contracts unenforceable.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48797123&quot; title=&quot;In the same way as Pablo Escobar was &amp;#39;brilliant&amp;#39; I suppose. By being financially successful while destroying countless lives.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. However, there is disagreement regarding arbitration, with some arguing it can actually serve as a &amp;#34;leveler&amp;#34; if companies are forced to cover all associated legal fees &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48796915&quot; title=&quot;I used to think so, too, but the Steam/Valve stuff from the past few years has opened my eyes to the usefulness of arbitration as a leveler (specifically, the parts of agreements that force big companies to pay all of the costs and fees). But definitely outlaw small clause carve-outs.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-07-04</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-07-04</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.mikebowler.ca/2026/07/03/co2-and-decision-making/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The bottleneck might be the air in the room&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.mikebowler.ca)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48783117&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;814 points · 459 comments · by gslin&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;High carbon dioxide levels in closed meeting rooms can significantly impair cognitive function and decision-making, leading to diminished performance in strategy and planning despite participants feeling only minor fatigue. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.mikebowler.ca/2026/07/03/co2-and-decision-making/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The bottleneck might be the air in the room    URL Source: https://blog.mikebowler.ca/2026/07/03/co2-and-decision-making/    Published Time: 2026-07-03T00:00:00-07:00    Markdown Content:  You gather your most expensive people into a room to make your most important decisions. Then, somewhere in the second hour, the room quietly gets worse at making them. Not the people. The room.    ![Image 1: Portable CO2 monitor reading 2143 ppm](https://files.mikebowler.ca/images/co2_reading.png)    2,143 ppm…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users suggest that integrating CO2 monitors into smartphones or watches could solve ventilation issues by raising public awareness of air quality in classrooms and theaters &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48783296&quot; title=&quot;I really wish a Apple or another major OEM would integrate CO2 monitor into watches or smartphones. Suddenly, everybody would be aware of the CO2 level in the room, get alerts, etc. and the problem will just solve itself. There are so many rooms, classrooms, movie theaters and other places with poor ventilation where you just feel dizzy, or fall asleep, not knowing it was just due to lower oxygen levels in your blood. Raising awareness is the only real solution.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others argue that miniaturization is difficult because current NDIR sensors require air chambers prone to water damage, and high-quality sensors remain expensive &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48783479&quot; title=&quot;I guess the problem is with the price of the sensors. Just look how expensive the Aranet 4 home shown in article is. There are worse devices for less like the IKEA alpstuga. I also don’t know how much electricity they pull.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48784046&quot; title=&quot;I think the issue is that the common tech requires sensors in an air-chamber. E.g. NDIR works by firing IR at a frequency that is absorbed by CO2. A sensor on the other side either measures the amount of IR light that got through (optical NDIR) or pressure/sound waves (photoacoustic NDIR). I guess that it&amp;#39;s hard to use any existing sensors, because they are relatively large and probably water could easily get into the chamber. Would be extremely cool if Apple, Samsung, and others can crack…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some question if the productivity impacts of CO2 are scientifically proven or if oxygen levels are a better metric &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48783351&quot; title=&quot;I’m not saying this isn’t a legitimate concern but this really seems to have exploded amongst the tech community as the next obsession. I see this pop up on X every few weeks. Is the concern about this really based on actual science? Is there empirical data proving people are less productive or are damaging themselves as a result of heightened CO2 levels? And I don’t mean observational epidemiology studies.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48784172&quot; title=&quot;Oxygen sensors used in car catalyst systems use a different effect based on electrochemistry.    I see no reason that couldn&amp;#39;t be minuaritized to grain-of-sand size. The question is if oxygen levels are as good an indicator as CO2 levels...    I suspect not.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48784207&quot; title=&quot;I don’t think we actually care about co2 levels. I think we use them as a proxy for o2 levels (same as our bodies do). So your idea would be great.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others point to submarine studies showing no ill effects even at 15,000 PPM &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48783337&quot; title=&quot;Submarines operate in the 1000s of PPM CO2 range and the sailors aboard generally do not experience any ill effects. This was tested and no deficits were found even at 15,000 PPM: https://asma.kglmeridian.com/view/journals/amhp/89/6/article...&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these debates, affordable consumer sensors like IKEA’s have revealed how quickly CO2 levels spike in closed rooms and how easily they are mitigated by opening a window &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48783504&quot; title=&quot;I got the ikea sensor, I’d say it’s way more accurate than you need for personal use. I wouldn’t use it as a scientific instrument but it’s well good enough to see if the room is ventilated enough. I was shocked to see just how fast CO2 climbs while in a room, and how just opening the window just a crack was enough to restore the room to baseline co2. The thing runs on usb 5v so the power consumption is negligible. It also plugs in to home assistant great.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48783599&quot; title=&quot;I would hesitate to say the IKEA is worse. Inside the IKEA is a reputable Sensirion all in one sensor module. It&amp;#39;s much cheaper and smaller because the CO2 sensor in it is using different (newer) technology that only released a few years ago from Sensirion. (Upd: the IKEA does have lower accuracy, with ±100 ppm instead of ±30 ppm. From the SEN63C datasheet)&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://javoriuski.com/post/youtube&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Leaking YouTube creators&amp;#39; private videos&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (javoriuski.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48786781&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;669 points · 391 comments · by javxfps&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A security researcher discovered a stored prompt injection vulnerability in YouTube Studio’s AI assistant that allows attackers to use video comments to trick creators into revealing private video titles or clicking malicious links disguised as official system notices. &lt;a href=&quot;https://javoriuski.com/post/youtube&quot; title=&quot;Title: Leaking YouTube Creators Private Videos    URL Source: https://javoriuski.com/post/youtube    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1](https://javoriuski.com/assets/youtube.jpg)    ## The Setup    YouTube Studio has an AI assistant called Ask Studio. You open it, ask something like &amp;#39;what are my viewers saying?&amp;#39; and it goes off, reads your comments, and comes back with a summary. Useful feature. Completely normal.    What&amp;#39;s not normal is what happens when one of those comments contains instructions instead of…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a systemic issue at Google where the performance review framework (GRAD) incentivizes launching new features over fixing critical bugs, leading engineers to &amp;#34;sweep issues under the rug&amp;#34; to protect their promotion prospects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787066&quot; title=&quot;I recently left Google having worked on a number of projects with various YouTube teams. I think I can explain why it&amp;#39;s being handled this way by YouTube. This is a fairly nuanced/involved issue, so the task of classifying the bug likely made it&amp;#39;s way to one of the engineers responsible for the implementation of this feature. That engineer has already launched this project, and filed it away under their GRAD (performance) artifacts for when promo/annual review talks roll around. There&amp;#39;s no…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787186&quot; title=&quot;Glad to hear this is a universal big tech experience. The promo process is entirely antithetical to shipping good products&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. This lack of accountability sparked a debate over professional ethics, with some arguing that software developers lack the rigorous licensing and safety responsibilities required of traditional engineers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788419&quot; title=&quot;I design and build trains. If I ignored a safety issue that I discovered - not one I caused by design but even one I discovered in an existing design -   because of a performance review my engineering licence would be revoked and I would be kicked out of the industry. This is a prime example of why programmers are not seriously considered engineers.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788566&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This is a prime example of why programmers are not seriously considered engineers. Seems to me like your comment is simply an example of prejudice. You&amp;#39;re just describing another standardized incentive structure that you&amp;#39;re operating in, and using that as a basis to extrapolate that programmers of all kinds—whether they work on a video platform or on machinery that could cause catastrophe if it fails—are implicitly careless careerists who refuse responsibility by nature.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788916&quot; title=&quot;The prejudice seems to be everywhere. Unfortunately, to my knowledge. Eg. architects vs construction engineers vs land surveyors vs construction designers vs urban planners…  anyone of them thinks that their profession is more valuable than the others…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users praised the article&amp;#39;s concise, factual reporting of the vulnerability, others noted the irony that YouTube does not classify prompt injection as a bug despite its potential to leak private data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787060&quot; title=&quot;bit meta but can I just applaud the article? Descriptive title, immediately comes to the point, no elaborate fluff, factual... what a nice change of pace. 95% of other users finding this would have done much worse. This is not clickbait, not calling for a social media campaign, has no embedded tweets of interaction with Google engineers trying to shame them, no singling out of individuals, ... Not sure if a user posting own material should declare so with `show hn` or so, that might be the only…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787293&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Attacker leaves the comment on a creator&amp;#39;s video. &amp;gt; Creator opens YouTube studio&amp;#39;s comment tab. &amp;gt; Creator clicks a suggested AI prompt (Designed by YouTube) &amp;gt; Injection fires, attacker-controlled content appears in the response. It&amp;#39;s insane that YouTube doesn&amp;#39;t see prompt injection as a bug.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787114&quot; title=&quot;You&amp;#39;re in for a surprise then, because this article is clearly in an LLM style. That doesn&amp;#39;t mean it&amp;#39;s hallucinated, no, there is a real human behind, but the actual content that you enjoyed is LLM-written.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/ammaarreshi/Generals-Mac-iOS-iPad/tree/main&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Command and Conquer Generals natively ported to macOS, iPhone, iPad using Fable&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788283&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;665 points · 274 comments · by asronline&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A new open-source project has natively ported *Command &amp;amp; Conquer Generals: Zero Hour* to macOS, iPhone, and iPad, utilizing the original 2003 engine and ARM64 architecture to enable features like RTS touch controls without emulation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/ammaarreshi/Generals-Mac-iOS-iPad/tree/main&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - ammaarreshi/Generals-Mac-iOS-iPad: Command &amp;amp; Conquer Generals: Zero Hour running natively on macOS, iPhone &amp;amp; iPad — real engine (EA GPL v3 source, via GeneralsX), DXVK/MoltenVK renderer, RTS touch controls. No game assets included.    URL Source: https://github.com/ammaarreshi/Generals-Mac-iOS-iPad/tree/main    Markdown Content:  [![Image 1:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The project, which builds on a previous GPL v3 source release to bring *C&amp;amp;C Generals* to Apple platforms, has sparked interest in whether similar techniques could revive other classic RTS titles like *Emperor: Battle for Dune* or *Red Alert 2* &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788334&quot; title=&quot;I wanna know if these techniques would be useful for Emperor: Battle for Dune (2001). It&amp;#39;s the first 3D RTS by Westwood Studios, predating C&amp;amp;C Generals by just a couple years. It&amp;#39;s popularity was hampered by intellectual property disputes and a introduction of a new faction that diverged from the book series lore. The gameplay, soundtrack, and campaign missions were awesome.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788381&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Built on EA&amp;#39;s GPL v3 source release via fbraz3/GeneralsX (which did the heavy lifting of the macOS/Linux port — this fork adds the iOS/iPadOS port and a set of engine fixes).&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788626&quot; title=&quot;Is there any hope for Red Alert 2?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. However, much of the discussion focuses on the &amp;#34;grating&amp;#34; AI-generated style of the port&amp;#39;s documentation, specifically the model&amp;#39;s tendency to invent complex &amp;#34;compound nouns&amp;#34; and jargon-heavy shorthand &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788648&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; (tap-select, drag-box, long-press deselect, two-finger scroll, pinch zoom) This is another &amp;#39;AI-ism&amp;#39; I noticed, mostly in coding agents - they seem to be very fond of making up new &amp;#39;compound nouns&amp;#39; (and occasionally verbs) to sum up relatively complex and specific concepts into single noun phrases. I wasn&amp;#39;t sure if it&amp;#39;s to save tokens or if the AI uses this to get a concise &amp;#39;identifier&amp;#39; for a concept that it can refer back to later, but I found it very noticeable. I find the resulting…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788939&quot; title=&quot;IMHO, this is an actual good use of what sounds like a person guiding a model to do a mass conversion. Although, I wish the porting docs were a little wordsmithed by a human, the AI generated text style is grating. The stakes are low, it’s mostly for fun and you can iterate on it. Compare this with Bun which was just like, “hey we converted everything to Bun to Rust from Zig, of course it works, what could possibly go wrong, I’ll totally write up a blogpost (that still doesn’t exist) explaining…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788792&quot; title=&quot;Yes! It&amp;#39;s infuriating. I&amp;#39;ve tried prohibiting them in my AGENTS.md but it&amp;#39;s not 100% effective. --- AGENTS.md --- ## Plain words, not jargon Don&amp;#39;t use jargon-as-shorthand. Say what you actually mean. - Don&amp;#39;t say &amp;#39;load-bearing assumptions&amp;#39;. Say &amp;#39;the assumptions the xyz depends on&amp;#39;. - Don&amp;#39;t say &amp;#39;cross-service&amp;#39;. Name both services, e.g. &amp;#39;whether the X    service can derive duration without calling the Y service&amp;#39;. &amp;#39;Cross-X&amp;#39; is    confusing because it hides which things are involved. - Don&amp;#39;t deliver…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. This led to a debate over the risks of AI-driven code migration, with some users criticizing Bun&amp;#39;s rapid, LLM-assisted rewrite from Zig to Rust as &amp;#34;irresponsible and reckless&amp;#34; due to a lack of human-led explanation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788939&quot; title=&quot;IMHO, this is an actual good use of what sounds like a person guiding a model to do a mass conversion. Although, I wish the porting docs were a little wordsmithed by a human, the AI generated text style is grating. The stakes are low, it’s mostly for fun and you can iterate on it. Compare this with Bun which was just like, “hey we converted everything to Bun to Rust from Zig, of course it works, what could possibly go wrong, I’ll totally write up a blogpost (that still doesn’t exist) explaining…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789227&quot; title=&quot;Some people, myself included, think that announcing a conversion from Rust to Zig as an experiment then jumping to putting it in the alpha train for public testing/consumption without any real explanation in the span of around 2 weeks is irresponsible and reckless. Blogposts were promised, details were hinted, but no, it’s just full steam ahead because the AI worked so well. The converted unit tests all worked, all the synthetic tests are okay, so what are you complaining about? At some point,…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789174&quot; title=&quot;I agree that the Bun rewrite is much more reasonable than knee-jerk reactions imply, however: - I don&amp;#39;t think Claude Code is using the Rust version yet in their official build - Claude Code is not a particularly complicated piece of software from an engineering perspective (nor it&amp;#39;s particularly well-engineered, at least at the moment). So in my book &amp;#39;it runs Claude Code&amp;#39; would be pretty weak evidence that the rewrite is going to be successful (the tests they&amp;#39;ve done are much better evidence,…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://software.annas-archive.gl/AnnaArchivist/annas-archive/-/work_items/234&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Google Books (or similar) all book scans – $200k bounty (2025)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (software.annas-archive.gl)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48786838&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;514 points · 325 comments · by Cider9986&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anna’s Archive has increased its bounty to $200,000 for anyone who can successfully scrape or leak the complete collection of book scans from Google Books or similar large-scale digital libraries to aid in their preservation efforts. &lt;a href=&quot;https://software.annas-archive.gl/AnnaArchivist/annas-archive/-/work_items/234&quot; title=&quot;Title: Google Books (or similar) all book scans — $200,000 bounty (#234) · Issues · AnnaArchivist / annas-archive · GitLab    URL Source: https://software.annas-archive.gl/AnnaArchivist/annas-archive/-/work_items/234    Markdown Content:  [Skip to main content](https://software.annas-archive.gl/AnnaArchivist/annas-archive/-/work_items/234#content-body)    ## Admin message    SIGN UP USING adguard-mail.com or mailinator.com for more reliable email delivery! -- Join our chat for devs &amp;amp; translators on…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a sharp divide between those who view book piracy as a vital tool for global education and those who see it as a threat to the creative economy. Proponents argue that access to knowledge is a fundamental right, especially for those in countries with severe market restrictions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787460&quot; title=&quot;I live in a country where the selection of available books, especially in English, is very limited. Buying online from foreign markets comes with a long list of administrative hurdles and limits. If it were not for Anna&amp;#39;s Archive and Z-Library, I would&amp;#39;ve never been able to read the books that shaped who I am today, or keep my passion for learning alive. Thanks, AA and ZLib! (Also, thank you to the authors whose books and knowledge I consumed without being able to pay them back.)&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789692&quot; title=&quot;So you’re saying your entire current life is because of the proceeds of crime?! I’m kidding. Knowledge should be free. It was never created in a vacuum. It belongs to us all&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, while critics contend that large-scale piracy demoralizes authors and destroys the financial incentive to produce high-quality work &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48790217&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Knowledge should be free. It was never created in a vacuum. This is a common perspective on HN, but it&amp;#39;s so jarring. Someone violates an open-source license and we grab our pitchforks. Someone pirates books and it&amp;#39;s fine - really, the authors should be thanking us. Good books are incredibly challenging to write, more so than good software. It&amp;#39;s not like you grab Harry Potter and say &amp;#39;I&amp;#39;m just gonna change character names and rephrase some of the text&amp;#39;. Most authors recognize that not everyone…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787455&quot; title=&quot;The US should just find a way to quietly share literature access with the Russians, rather than letting piracy be promoted and facilitated for US consumers as freedom-fighter &amp;#39;archiving&amp;#39;. Between all the piracy, and all the AI training and the purchase/visitor-circumventing AI services, the practice of writing and publishing genuinely good work is being wiped out. We&amp;#39;re killing the goose that lays the eggs, for selfish gain.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788695&quot; title=&quot;Look, fair enough from your perspective. But a lot of those books probably wouldn&amp;#39;t exist if the author couldn&amp;#39;t make some money from their work. I can&amp;#39;t find the post but years ago on Reddit an author posted stats showing when her book turned up pirates online, real sales for it collapsed. Because of this I make a point of buying books, programming books especially. Yes I download pdfs, I use them as previews. This has led to buying way more than I would have. Anyway, I appreciate this doesn&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users suggest that while piracy may be a moral necessity for those unable to pay, it is often used as a selfish excuse to avoid supporting creators &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48790217&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Knowledge should be free. It was never created in a vacuum. This is a common perspective on HN, but it&amp;#39;s so jarring. Someone violates an open-source license and we grab our pitchforks. Someone pirates books and it&amp;#39;s fine - really, the authors should be thanking us. Good books are incredibly challenging to write, more so than good software. It&amp;#39;s not like you grab Harry Potter and say &amp;#39;I&amp;#39;m just gonna change character names and rephrase some of the text&amp;#39;. Most authors recognize that not everyone…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788695&quot; title=&quot;Look, fair enough from your perspective. But a lot of those books probably wouldn&amp;#39;t exist if the author couldn&amp;#39;t make some money from their work. I can&amp;#39;t find the post but years ago on Reddit an author posted stats showing when her book turned up pirates online, real sales for it collapsed. Because of this I make a point of buying books, programming books especially. Yes I download pdfs, I use them as previews. This has led to buying way more than I would have. Anyway, I appreciate this doesn&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the $200k bounty sparked speculation about potential data exfiltration by disgruntled employees, though others noted the legal risks far outweigh the reward &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787614&quot; title=&quot;Anyone afraid of being laid off at google right now? Perhaps this is a backup :)&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787747&quot; title=&quot;I think if you get caught exfiltrating data they&amp;#39;ll sue you for much more than $200K.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.marginalia.nu/log/a_135_learn/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Maybe you should learn something&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (marginalia.nu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48782435&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;458 points · 201 comments · by tylerdane&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author encourages individuals to pursue self-directed learning of new skills, emphasizing that while the initial practice is mentally and physically taxing, consistent daily effort combined with sleep leads to long-term personal growth and a greater sense of agency. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.marginalia.nu/log/a_135_learn/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Maybe you should learn something    URL Source: https://www.marginalia.nu/log/a_135_learn/    Published Time: 2026-04-26T00:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  You can learn new things. Pixel art, touch typing, 3d modelling, music, calligraphy, wood working, knitting, a language. Whatever is practical and calls to you, you can learn.    In the long term, learning new things is fun and makes life richer in ways you can’t even imagine, and it’s a time investment that will pay dividends for life as…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While there is consensus that learning provides a vital sense of agency and emotional resilience &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48782436&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Learning anything is a long term project, and long term projects are necessary for building a sense of control over your circumstances. Almost nothing can be deliberately and meaningfully changed within the scope of a day, but in months, certainly years, a lot of things can be made to happen.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48783208&quot; title=&quot;The best thing for being sad,&amp;#39; replied Merlin, beginning to puff and blow, &amp;#39;is to learn something. That&amp;#39;s the only thing that never fails. You may grow old and trembling in your anatomies, you may lie awake at night listening to the disorder of your veins, you may miss your only love, you may see the world about you devastated by evil lunatics, or know your honour trampled in the sewers of baser minds. There is only one thing for it then — to learn. Learn why the world wags and what wags it.…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, commenters disagree on whether &amp;#34;lack of time&amp;#34; is a literal constraint or a symptom of digital distraction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48784707&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a very common thing to blame the lack of time and &amp;#39;finding&amp;#39; the extra time by suggesting to give up phone or some other form of procrastination. But in my experience, time is almost never a problem. It&amp;#39;s usually: - energy: learning requires much more than the other &amp;#39;bad&amp;#39; activities like phone - correct psychological state: procrastination is typically triggered as a response to anxiety for me, so any learning I do instead of the phone will also have this poisonous quality of guilt and…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48785330&quot; title=&quot;(Author of the post) For energy, it both requires and pays dividends.  It&amp;#39;s a bit like working out in that sense. I think my intended takeaway was that you really don&amp;#39;t need to have make the thing you&amp;#39;re studying take a lot of time, that daily consistency matters more than pouring hours into practice and obsessing about it. Though in general, I do still think it&amp;#39;s the phones and media diet that is the problem with the sense of lacking time. Few years ago I had a full time job I felt like I had…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Some argue that cognitive energy is a finite daily resource easily exhausted by work and parenting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48784707&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a very common thing to blame the lack of time and &amp;#39;finding&amp;#39; the extra time by suggesting to give up phone or some other form of procrastination. But in my experience, time is almost never a problem. It&amp;#39;s usually: - energy: learning requires much more than the other &amp;#39;bad&amp;#39; activities like phone - correct psychological state: procrastination is typically triggered as a response to anxiety for me, so any learning I do instead of the phone will also have this poisonous quality of guilt and…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48782945&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;have infants ricocheting around your home like screaming DVD logos, then you may want to put this ambition aside for now and deal with that instead&amp;#39; Even older kids... my 6 year old is jumping on the couch as I type this.. I like remote work but when I had to commute it was really nice to have that downtime built in to the day. I learned a lot of Dutch vocabulary on the train.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48785546&quot; title=&quot;I think what the parent post was saying is that there is a finite amount of useful mental function time in any one day, and once you’ve exhausted this any attempted learning will be pretty inefficient. Also some jobs will have a faster burn rate. Doing a workout is separate as it doesn’t draw on the mental energy pool.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, while others suggest that consistent, small-scale practice can overcome these hurdles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48785330&quot; title=&quot;(Author of the post) For energy, it both requires and pays dividends.  It&amp;#39;s a bit like working out in that sense. I think my intended takeaway was that you really don&amp;#39;t need to have make the thing you&amp;#39;re studying take a lot of time, that daily consistency matters more than pouring hours into practice and obsessing about it. Though in general, I do still think it&amp;#39;s the phones and media diet that is the problem with the sense of lacking time. Few years ago I had a full time job I felt like I had…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable obstacles discussed include the demoralizing rise of AI-assisted translation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48784385&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s really a feeling now pushing back against learning in general. The feeling is that it is pointless since technology would just do it for you. When I started learning Chinese a friend just wouldn&amp;#39;t stop talking about how the latest airpods will just be able to translate for you. It was really rather demoralising. But there is still something incredibly rewarding about having that knowledge in your own head and not having to go find someone or something to ask. I push on regardless.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, the trap of consuming educational content without making errors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48783254&quot; title=&quot;One thing I wish this emphasized more is that adults often confuse learning with consuming material about learning, which is why my useful rule has become: if I&amp;#39;m not producing errors, I&amp;#39;m probably not practicing yet&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, and the intense demands of raising children &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48782945&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;have infants ricocheting around your home like screaming DVD logos, then you may want to put this ambition aside for now and deal with that instead&amp;#39; Even older kids... my 6 year old is jumping on the couch as I type this.. I like remote work but when I had to commute it was really nice to have that downtime built in to the day. I learned a lot of Dutch vocabulary on the train.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48784364&quot; title=&quot;Children are not god for peace of mind and a life of liberty. I do not recommend anyone to have children, becaues of how negatively it affects your life, cost of living etc. It is basically just tying yourself down to the wheel of consumption, and in order to jutsify everything, all the struggle, push your hopes and aspirations to the next generation, and then letting them deal with it. If you are rich, you can get around this by hiring people to take care of the children, so then it could be…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://peteris.rocks/blog/htop/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Explanation of everything you can see in htop/top on Linux (2019)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (peteris.rocks)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48784777&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;500 points · 62 comments · by theanonymousone&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article provides a comprehensive guide to the **htop** and **top** Linux utilities, explaining system metrics like load averages, process states, and memory usage (VIRT/RES/SHR) while detailing the specific background services and kernel tasks commonly found on an Ubuntu server. &lt;a href=&quot;https://peteris.rocks/blog/htop/&quot; title=&quot;Title: htop explained    URL Source: https://peteris.rocks/blog/htop/    Markdown Content:  For the longest time I did not know what everything meant in htop.    I thought that load average `1.0` on my two core machine means that the CPU usage is at 50%. That&amp;#39;s not quite right. And also, why does it say `1.0`?    I decided to look everything up and document it here.    They also say that the best way to learn something is to try to teach it.    ## Table of Contents    *   [htop on Ubuntu Server 16.04…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether traditional tools like `htop` remain relevant as high-performance workloads shift from CPUs to GPUs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48785693&quot; title=&quot;Nowadays most of my processing happens on the GPU, so htop/top better evolve or become mostly irrelevant because a tool that will support both CPU __and__ GPU will replace it.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48785875&quot; title=&quot;Nails and hammers are great but most of us have moved on to screws and screwdrivers. What good does it do to stick your head in the sand? CPUs are great for orchestrating work, GPUs are great for actually doing the work.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48786220&quot; title=&quot;For high performance work, gpus have replaced cpus a long time ago.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that monitoring tools must evolve to include GPU and power metrics to avoid obsolescence, others maintain that CPUs remain essential for orchestration and that specialized tools do not replace general ones &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48785825&quot; title=&quot;Irrelevant for you does not mean irrelevant for others&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48785932&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;#39;What good does it do to stick your head in the sand?&amp;#39; Get the fuck out. I do write for GPU as well. One does not replace the other.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Participants recommend modern alternatives like `btop` and `nmon` for their integrated GPU, disk, and network monitoring, though these tools still face limitations regarding specific hardware support and UI flexibility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48785704&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve relatively recently migrated over to using btop[0], and it&amp;#39;s the kind of modern interface,  useful and informative, that I needed. As others mention it - it seems to shows the Watts used as well :) (and network, and GPU, and disks,....) [0]: https://github.com/aristocratos/btop&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789262&quot; title=&quot;I like btop, but there are downsides: 1.) No zram/zswap statistics. (Though htop only supports zram also.) 2.) No ZFS statistics breakdown. 3.) Doesn&amp;#39;t support Arc GPU yet. 4.) I can&amp;#39;t disable the disk fill bars, which makes the I/O rate graphs extremely squished unless the console window is very large.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48786919&quot; title=&quot;For the ones that don&amp;#39;t know &amp;#39;nmon&amp;#39;, have a look at it as well! (press &amp;#39;h&amp;#39; to see the list of available monitors - press it again to make it go away, press &amp;#39;q&amp;#39; to quit) https://nmon.sourceforge.io/pmwiki.php Especially disk throughput and I/O (keys &amp;#39;d&amp;#39; &amp;amp; &amp;#39;D&amp;#39;) can be very useful.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, there is a strong emphasis on correctly interpreting memory metrics, noting that users often mistakenly rely on virtual memory size rather than resident set size &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48786723&quot; title=&quot;I appreciate the note on virtual memory not being reliable. This is what Windows task manager reports by default and it&amp;#39;s terrible. Resident size is the most reliable metric. Anything else can be wrongfully inflated by things like harmless memory mapped files that won&amp;#39;t actually hurt anything. eg. memory map 2GB of logfiles, it&amp;#39;ll only be paged in if reading that portion of the logfile so isn&amp;#39;t really using memory but users look at the processes and claim &amp;#39;OMG why does this app use so much…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/30364&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GPT-5.5 Codex reasoning-token clustering may be leading to degraded performance&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789428&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;361 points · 148 comments · by maille&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users report that GPT-5.5 Codex exhibits degraded performance on complex tasks due to an anomaly where reasoning tokens disproportionately cluster at fixed boundaries of 516, 1034, and 1552, suggesting potential hidden truncation or reasoning-budget caps. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/30364&quot; title=&quot;Title: GPT-5.5 Codex reasoning-token clustering at 516/1034/1552 may be leading to degraded performance on complex tasks    URL Source: https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/30364    Published Time: 2026-06-27T14:40:18.000Z    Markdown Content:  [Skip to content](https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/30364#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [](https://github.com/)    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users report a significant decline in GPT-5.5 Codex&amp;#39;s coding quality, characterized by &amp;#34;incredibly stupid implementations&amp;#34; and a perceived &amp;#34;short-circuiting&amp;#34; where the model uses exactly 516 reasoning tokens before failing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789846&quot; title=&quot;I’ve definitely experienced step jumps down in quality on an almost daily basis. I usually used xhigh. The experience of relying on codex’s outstandingly thorough coding earlier in the year has evaporated for me. I’m seeing incredibly stupid implementations intermittently, and have simply switched to Claude until openai takes the issue seriously. As far as i could tell they haven’t taken it seriously for the several months I’ve been personally seeing it.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789957&quot; title=&quot;Oh this seems bad, and is fairly easy to reproduce using codex cli. You give it a puzzle prompt that it has to reason about and solve, occasionally it will seemingly short circuit and think for exactly 516 tokens, and return the wrong result. When it ends up using 6000-8000 thinking tokens it returns the correct result. Maybe some issue with adaptive thinking? Another point for local models I guess, don&amp;#39;t have to worry about silent server side changes. Edit: To follow up, it seems to happen…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some attribute these regressions to non-deterministic behavior or &amp;#34;vibe-based&amp;#34; whining &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48790070&quot; title=&quot;The vibe-assumed claude code performance regression, yep. People should stop expecting consistent performance from non-deterministic systems. There is zero empirical corroboration of performance degredation. There has been a step change... in the amount of whining and complaining coders exhibit lately.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others have documented a 40% failure rate in small-scale testing linked to this specific token clustering issue &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789957&quot; title=&quot;Oh this seems bad, and is fairly easy to reproduce using codex cli. You give it a puzzle prompt that it has to reason about and solve, occasionally it will seemingly short circuit and think for exactly 516 tokens, and return the wrong result. When it ends up using 6000-8000 thinking tokens it returns the correct result. Maybe some issue with adaptive thinking? Another point for local models I guess, don&amp;#39;t have to worry about silent server side changes. Edit: To follow up, it seems to happen…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Consequently, many developers are cycling between Codex and Claude as performance fluctuates, or are resorting to using the ChatGPT web interface for reasoning before pasting solutions into their coding tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48790020&quot; title=&quot;Deja Vu... This looks just like the Claude Code performance regression back in April. I just quit my Claude subscription when that happened and went to Codex. Now I&amp;#39;m kinda thinking of trying per token for both, using GLM 5.2 on Fireworks for most tasks, shelling out to the big boys only when needed. Not totally confident I&amp;#39;ll break even though.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789872&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve switched 3 months ago to Codex because Claude got incredibly stupid. 6 months ago vice versa. It doesn&amp;#39;t matter if you use Codex or Claude. Both will fuck with you at some point. Though Codex probably less.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789952&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m struggling as well to understand, and I think perhaps they mean they use ChatGPT website with GPT-5.5+reasoning for problem solving, and paste the output into Codex CLI/App. I think they&amp;#39;re saying that letting Codex CLI/App problem solve with GPT-5.5 isn&amp;#39;t as effective. Essentially that the web harness is superior to the agentic engineering harness for problem solving? Not sure if I agree, but I do happen to use a fair bit of web harness as well, just because I find it to be much more…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eso.org/public/news/eso2607/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;“Beyond the limit”: Satellites and mirrors in space pose threat to the night sky&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (eso.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787042&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;187 points · &lt;strong&gt;304 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by Breadmaker&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A new study warns that proposals to launch 1.7 million satellites and orbital mirrors pose an &amp;#34;existential threat&amp;#34; to astronomy, potentially saturating telescope images with bright streaks and increasing overall sky brightness to levels that would obscure faint cosmic targets and distant galaxies. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eso.org/public/news/eso2607/&quot; title=&quot;Title: &amp;#39;Beyond the limit&amp;#39;: one million satellites and mirrors in space pose grave threat to the night sky    URL Source: https://www.eso.org/public/news/eso2607/    Markdown Content:  ### Press Release    1 July 2026    A new European Southern Observatory (ESO) study has found that current proposals to launch over 1.7 million satellites into orbit, including extremely bright ones, would have “devastating consequences for astronomy.” According to the study, no more than 100 000 faint satellites, below…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate centers on the tension between preserving the night sky for astronomy and the rapid expansion of orbital infrastructure. Proponents of expansion argue that satellite constellations are essential for global human flourishing, such as providing internet to underserved regions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787566&quot; title=&quot;These kinds of caps have for years been a dampener on human flourishing. My observation has been that those in stagnation or decline tend to attach themselves to these desires to hold the status quo. Anti-energy, anti-housing, anti-industry and so on because they&amp;#39;ve reached a local maxima in their ability to live and have chosen to spend their life in leisure. But there is the rest of the world, and if I&amp;#39;m told that the Africans should not have access to high-speed satellite Internet[0] so that…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, and suggest that a high-volume space industry will eventually make space-based telescopes cheaper and more accessible &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787794&quot; title=&quot;The article doesn’t consider that in a world with a million satellites in orbit, launching space-based telescopes—including into deep space—becomes an order of magnitude cheaper.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787523&quot; title=&quot;I am a science and astronomy fan, but I am sorry, in this case progress is more important. If we regret our decision, the LEOs will fall out of the sky by themselves in a few years and it will be ok.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, critics argue that the &amp;#34;human progress&amp;#34; narrative is often used to dismiss valid concerns about environmental disruption and the concentration of power in the hands of a few tech giants &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787707&quot; title=&quot;I think that &amp;#39;Africans should not have access to high-speed satellite Internet&amp;#39; is something you&amp;#39;ve just made up; the article you link talks about African people turning to Starlink because of local infrastructure issues, and the original article notes that the current satellite count is currently around 14k satellites. 100k is more than enough satellites to provide high-speed satellite internet globally. The article makes mention of specific endeavours, like the night-time mirror satellites,…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787984&quot; title=&quot;AI is not going to give us a star trek utopia, AI is an attempt by the bourgeoise to alienate the average person from the capital that has previously always come free with their human life. AI promises a feudalist future where there is no capital that isn&amp;#39;t owned by the ruling class. Its power is not democratized, it is concentrated in the hands of those building the data centers. That is why I&amp;#39;m against the data centers. I feel like all leftists should be.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see this as a necessary trade-off similar to building power lines or dams &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787548&quot; title=&quot;This is a tradeoff we have to make with infrastructure and development in general. How do you balance human needs with pristine nature? Do we put up long-distance power lines and wind farms even though they ruin the views? Do you tear down a forest to put up farmlands and suburbs? Do you build a dam to provide water for irrigation, even though it kills the fish and floods a valley? Satellites are actually easier than most of those tradeoffs, because nothing lives in space and there&amp;#39;s no nature…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others worry that the current trajectory favors corporate and military interests over the shared scientific heritage of humanity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787422&quot; title=&quot;Worrying for sure. But I doubt the current USA, along with Israel and Russia are going to be bothered about this. Everyone is launching satellites and other gear into orbit for war.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787984&quot; title=&quot;AI is not going to give us a star trek utopia, AI is an attempt by the bourgeoise to alienate the average person from the capital that has previously always come free with their human life. AI promises a feudalist future where there is no capital that isn&amp;#39;t owned by the ruling class. Its power is not democratized, it is concentrated in the hands of those building the data centers. That is why I&amp;#39;m against the data centers. I feel like all leftists should be.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/74066&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Potential session/cache leakage between workspace instances or consumer accounts&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48785485&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;313 points · 132 comments · by chatmasta&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users have reported a potential security vulnerability in Claude Code involving session and cache leakage, where the AI agent surfaced unrelated content from other users&amp;#39; conversations. Anthropic is investigating whether these incidents are server-side data breaches or local context hallucinations triggered by specific file names. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/74066&quot; title=&quot;Title: [Bug] Potential session/cache leakage between workspace instances or consumer accounts    URL Source: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/74066    Published Time: 2026-07-04T02:04:31.000Z    Markdown Content:  [Skip to content](https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/74066#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [](https://github.com/)    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether reported data leaks are genuine infrastructure failures or merely LLM hallucinations, with one user noting that specific mentions of &amp;#34;Minecraft&amp;#34; might stem from internal package file paths rather than leaked user data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48785665&quot; title=&quot;Sounds like a hallucination unless proven otherwise, even the leading LLMs can do those from time to time, and they will always appear plausible like that. Also could be the session having a lot previous context, like 800K+, which (I think) makes hallucinations more likely. Relevant comment from the OP which makes a hallucination more likely: &amp;gt; There is one tool call result that includes a string that printed a pathname including minecraft.py because it was listing the files in a Python virtual…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. However, an industry insider claims to have witnessed two instances where $1T+ companies experienced &amp;#34;off-by-one&amp;#34; errors in API gateways, causing responses to be swapped between different customers in flight &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48786654&quot; title=&quot;Using a throwaway account for obvious reasons, but I’m very involved in this space using LLMs from multiple providers. I’m aware of at least two instances in which the intermediate infrastructure “swapped” responses, once impacting Claude models and once impacting GPT models, from two different providers. One gave us a proper postmortem in which their API gateway was incorrectly handling HTTP 100 status codes, putting them into an error state where there was effectively an off by one error -…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some participants debate the competence of AI leadership and the necessity of open-source models for safety, others suggest that these isolation issues are not unique to LLMs but represent broader challenges in SaaS infrastructure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48786654&quot; title=&quot;Using a throwaway account for obvious reasons, but I’m very involved in this space using LLMs from multiple providers. I’m aware of at least two instances in which the intermediate infrastructure “swapped” responses, once impacting Claude models and once impacting GPT models, from two different providers. One gave us a proper postmortem in which their API gateway was incorrectly handling HTTP 100 status codes, putting them into an error state where there was effectively an off by one error -…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48785856&quot; title=&quot;Is there anything particular about LLMs that would make separating customer data harder than in all SaaS cases?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48786733&quot; title=&quot;These companies(at least one of them) seem lead by idiots(Hint:his name is Dario) so I wouldn’t be surprised to have multiple wtf moment if you were to see how they treat our data…Let’s just start pushing for opening up AI models because they are too dangerous behind paid walls. That would be a great regulation.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.seattletimes.com/business/local-business/as-downtown-seattle-offices-empty-city-facing-years-of-zombie-towers/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;As downtown Seattle offices empty, city facing years of &amp;#39;zombie&amp;#39; towers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (seattletimes.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787725&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;148 points · &lt;strong&gt;204 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by petethomas&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seattle faces a prolonged economic challenge as high office vacancy rates threaten to turn underutilized downtown skyscrapers into &amp;#34;zombie&amp;#34; towers, impacting the city&amp;#39;s tax revenue and small business ecosystem. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.seattletimes.com/business/local-business/as-downtown-seattle-offices-empty-city-facing-years-of-zombie-towers/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;web.archive.org&amp;amp;#x2F;web&amp;amp;#x2F;20260704133227&amp;amp;#x2F;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.seattletimes.com&amp;amp;#x2F;business&amp;amp;#x2F;local-business&amp;amp;#x2F;as-downtown-seattle-offices-empty-city-facing-years-of-zombie-towers&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;web.archive.org&amp;amp;#x2F;web&amp;amp;#x2F;20260704133227&amp;amp;#x2F;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.seatt...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The decline of downtown Seattle is attributed to a combination of rigid commercial real estate financing that prevents landlords from lowering rents and a shifting business climate where major tenants like Amazon have reduced their footprints &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788639&quot; title=&quot;Seattle here, and a real estate nerd. This is almost entirely an artifact of the financial instruments used to pay for these buildings, regardless of any Seattle policy changes. The Seattle Times has always been a conservative rag, and their editorial board hates the new mayor, so they hit the &amp;#39;Seattle is dying&amp;#39; story as often as possible. They&amp;#39;ve got a long history of this whenever there&amp;#39;s leadership they don&amp;#39;t like, ask me about it! In Bellevue, office vacancies are low because most have long…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788333&quot; title=&quot;If you haven&amp;#39;t lived in Seattle, it&amp;#39;s hard to understand the problem. It&amp;#39;s multifaceted; business climate, generally poor quality of the city itself as a walking / working destination, extremely hostile to business city government, and greener pastures (literally) east across the bay, which happen to be closer to some very large headquarters. The die was largely cast when Amazon called Seattle&amp;#39;s bluff during COVID and relocated, but so much needs to be done to make the city itself an attractive…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48791245&quot; title=&quot;The financial instruments are commercial real estate loans. Those loans often do not allow the borrower to charge lower rent. Property taxes are not calculated that way. The property tax rate for a given year is backed into (a &amp;#39;mill rate&amp;#39;) based on approved dollars of spending divided by total property value. If total citywide property value drops by 50%, the property tax rate doubles that year. So no, the property value changes aren&amp;#39;t really an issue.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the city&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;hostile&amp;#34; tax and regulatory environment is driving a permanent exodus, others contend the &amp;#34;zombie&amp;#34; towers are a temporary artifact of a slow market correction that will resolve as buildings are sold to new owners at lower valuations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788639&quot; title=&quot;Seattle here, and a real estate nerd. This is almost entirely an artifact of the financial instruments used to pay for these buildings, regardless of any Seattle policy changes. The Seattle Times has always been a conservative rag, and their editorial board hates the new mayor, so they hit the &amp;#39;Seattle is dying&amp;#39; story as often as possible. They&amp;#39;ve got a long history of this whenever there&amp;#39;s leadership they don&amp;#39;t like, ask me about it! In Bellevue, office vacancies are low because most have long…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788333&quot; title=&quot;If you haven&amp;#39;t lived in Seattle, it&amp;#39;s hard to understand the problem. It&amp;#39;s multifaceted; business climate, generally poor quality of the city itself as a walking / working destination, extremely hostile to business city government, and greener pastures (literally) east across the bay, which happen to be closer to some very large headquarters. The die was largely cast when Amazon called Seattle&amp;#39;s bluff during COVID and relocated, but so much needs to be done to make the city itself an attractive…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48791219&quot; title=&quot;What are the financial &amp;#39;instruments&amp;#39; ? The main claims from the article seem worrysome, IN particular, the 37% vacancy rate, as well as multiple buildings underwater[3], etc. Now, lets dissect the claims that this is part of some cycle, and not the result of new city hall management. The reality is that with Jumpstart, and with the vacancy rate, enterprises are not renting. But, the owner is stuck with the asset in what is now a hostile jurisdiction. So, even if owner may not be able to change…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Converting these vacant offices to residential units is frequently suggested but faces significant hurdles due to prohibitive seismic costs and floor plans that are impractical for housing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787952&quot; title=&quot;I know that commercial and residential building codes are different, but you would think converting them to residential units would fix this..&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787999&quot; title=&quot;The article goes into this: &amp;gt; The city of Seattle estimates that, with aggressive incentives, conversions could generate up to 6,000 housing units over the next seven years. At a rough approximation, that would use around a fifth of the city’s present office surplus. &amp;gt; But “potential” is doing a lot of work here. &amp;gt; Newer, larger office buildings, like the U.S. Bank Center, are hugely impractical for conversion, thanks to massive floor plates, centralized plumbing and other utilities and a host…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.quantamagazine.org/astrophysicists-puzzle-over-webbs-new-universe-20260702/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Astrophysicists Puzzle over Webb’s New Universe&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (quantamagazine.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48783948&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;211 points · 127 comments · by jnord&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Astrophysicists are developing new theories to explain the James Webb Space Telescope’s discovery of unexpectedly massive black holes and bright, diverse galaxies that challenge existing models of the early universe. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.quantamagazine.org/astrophysicists-puzzle-over-webbs-new-universe-20260702/&quot; title=&quot;Astrophysicists Puzzle Over Webb’s New Universe | Quanta Magazine    Faced with observations of early black holes and galaxies that weren’t expected to exist, scientists have come up with a wealth of new theories to explain them. Now they just need to figure out which ones are true.    [Quanta Homepage](/)    * [Physics](https://www.quantamagazine.org/./physics/)  * [Mathematics](https://www.quantamagazine.org/./mathematics/)  * [Biology](https://www.quantamagazine.org/./biology/)  * [Computer…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;JWST’s observations of &amp;#34;too-early&amp;#34; galaxies and &amp;#34;little red dots&amp;#34; have challenged existing cosmological models, leading some to question the Big Bang theory while others propose that primordial black holes (PBHs) could explain these anomalies without requiring new physics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48785076&quot; title=&quot;The most exciting idea to me that JWST has bolstered is primordial black holes. Many models already predict them but JWST has provided the first good indirect evidence in the form of too-early galaxies. The models that predict PBHs predict that. If they exist, they would not be constrained to stellar mass and above. There could be a population of little black holes floating around. Anything under the mass of a decent size asteroid would have evaporated by now but anything that mass and above…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48784264&quot; title=&quot;As observations become too numerous, it seems like it can be summarized as there now being too many possible candidate explanations. As data increases and becomes clearer, more and more things don&amp;#39;t fit the existing theories. What are the current theories explaining the early universe? What happened to the Big Bang? I only studied astronomy up to an undergraduate level, so I don&amp;#39;t really know. I imagine that various non-uniform gases were scattered around, and due to spatial distortions, those…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48785418&quot; title=&quot;Instead of questioning whether the Big Bang assumption is true, astrophysicists prefer to perform endless &amp;#39;gymnastics&amp;#39; to try to make the mounting contrary data fit their theory about how the universe began.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48786971&quot; title=&quot;Little red dots are my favorite new concept in astrophysics. This idea that there could be so much matter orbiting a black hole that the matter reaches sun levels of pressure which in turn starts steller fission without there being an star. Mind-blowing&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users remain skeptical of the data or the &amp;#34;gymnastics&amp;#34; used to preserve current theories, others highlight PBHs as a potential Rosetta Stone for quantum gravity if one could be located within our solar system &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48785076&quot; title=&quot;The most exciting idea to me that JWST has bolstered is primordial black holes. Many models already predict them but JWST has provided the first good indirect evidence in the form of too-early galaxies. The models that predict PBHs predict that. If they exist, they would not be constrained to stellar mass and above. There could be a population of little black holes floating around. Anything under the mass of a decent size asteroid would have evaporated by now but anything that mass and above…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48784773&quot; title=&quot;That’s a beautiful article showcasing our predicament in having access to more information about the universe.   Now i have to be the one to ask the dumb defensive question: what makes us so certain that we can trust what we see on James Webb?   Can we definitely discard a measurement problem?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48785261&quot; title=&quot;Of course if we had a black hole in a lab (or one in a convenient orbit) we could run all sort of experiments, but which experiments exactly? We will start by throwing things at it and watch, obviously, but that&amp;#39;s unimaginative. What are the smart experiments?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48785418&quot; title=&quot;Instead of questioning whether the Big Bang assumption is true, astrophysicists prefer to perform endless &amp;#39;gymnastics&amp;#39; to try to make the mounting contrary data fit their theory about how the universe began.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also reflects on the evolution of science communication, debating the accessibility and lasting accuracy of foundational texts like Hawking’s *A Brief History of Time* &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48785538&quot; title=&quot;There was a time where Hawking&amp;#39;s A brief history of time gave a decent overview of  the universe to beginners.  Does anyone know how well it holds up today and if anything better exists?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48785674&quot; title=&quot;There was never a time when a book gave the public an overview of the universe. ABHOT was so popular for being a book no one actually read, theres even an index named after Hawking due to it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_Index Did _you_ read that book? There however definitely was a piece of media that captured public minds and educated them about the cosmos. And that was the show Cosmos. The original of course. Not the NDT drivel.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48784557&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Faced with observations of early black holes and galaxies that weren’t expected to exist, scientists have come up with a wealth of new theories to explain them. Now they just need to figure out which ones are true. This subtitle really bothers me. Science isn&amp;#39;t about finding out what is true. Science is about finding out what is false and building models to explain the rest. We can never confidently say we know something to be true because that closes the door for future science to disprove…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ziglang.org/devlog/2026/#2026-06-30&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Zig: All Package Management Functionality Moved from Compiler to Build System&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ziglang.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48786638&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;229 points · 93 comments · by tosh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Zig has moved all package management functionality from the compiler to the build system&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;maker&amp;#34; process, enabling faster builds, safety-checked networking, and easier patching without compiler rebuilds. The change also introduces a serialized configuration file to optimize `zig build` performance and unblock build server protocol development. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ziglang.org/devlog/2026/#2026-06-30&quot; title=&quot;Title: Devlog ⚡ Zig Programming Language    URL Source: https://ziglang.org/devlog/2026/    Published Time: Sat, 04 Jul 2026 19:44:37 GMT    Markdown Content:  This page contains a curated list of recent changes to main branch Zig.    This page contains entries for the year 2026. Other years are available in [the Devlog archive page](https://ziglang.org/devlog/).    June 30, 2026    ## [All Package Management Functionality Moved from Compiler to Build…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Zig community is debating the merits of moving package management into the build system, with some highlighting the long-term goal of running the build system within a WebAssembly VM for sandboxing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788955&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve read somewhere that the longer-term goal is to move the build system into a WebAssembly VM. If so, this is incredible.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789232&quot; title=&quot;What’s the advantage of that for building?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that sandboxing should be handled by the environment rather than the tool, others see Wasm as a practical way to secure build scripts that often require broad system access &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789359&quot; title=&quot;sandboxing, which feels a weird way to achieve that. Although the reason for it to begin with is because builds systems can typically access raw memory and disable artificial restrictions. I think this is a bad move since the real fix to these attacks is a sandboxed environment rather than a single tool implementing sandboxing.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789417&quot; title=&quot;How would you do it, then? Sandboxing a project&amp;#39;s build.zig via Wasm (and the various dependencies&amp;#39;s build.zig files) seems like a great improvement to me and is how I would personally try to sandbox the build process.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789526&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know what build.zig commonly does, but in Rust build.rs often does things like compiling C/C++ libraries, so you can&amp;#39;t sandbox it with WASM (contrary to proc macros, which most of the times can be compiled to WASM and there were/are efforts for that). How does Zig fare with that?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics express concern that language-specific package managers complicate polyglot development, noting that the industry still lacks a standardized, lightweight cross-platform build system &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789221&quot; title=&quot;Everytime I see a language creating their own package system, all I can think of it how much we&amp;#39;ve missed here. The only exception is C/C++, where there is none established that well, for good or bad. These choices may create later super-convoluted processes when you have to mix more than one language together. Packaging systems makes thing easy, but complicate further the line if another language needs to be used.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789249&quot; title=&quot;The world has yet to standardize on a good crossplatform polyglot build system. The only real such build systems are Buck and Bazel. But they have way too much baggage from their overlords. It’s a shame.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the deliberate design of Zig is cited as a testament to human craftsmanship in an era of LLM-generated code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788735&quot; title=&quot;The thing about Zig in these times is that it proves that software development as a craft is not dead or replaced by LLMs. Even though I use LLMs every day, and have to admit they&amp;#39;re remarkably good at many classes of problem, I don&amp;#39;t want a programming language built by an LLM. Every line of code in a programming language, every decision, every trade off, matters. A vibe-designed/vibe-coded programming language would be a disaster. I don&amp;#39;t know how else to put it, and I&amp;#39;ve never seen any model…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/data-centers/cheyenne-suspends-data-center-fill-and-flush-and-closed-loop-discharges-after-meta-contractor-contaminated-its-reuse-water-system&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Meta data center water discharges suspended for contaminating water supply&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tomshardware.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48786782&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;235 points · 80 comments · by sensanaty&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheyenne, Wyoming, has suspended wastewater discharge privileges for a Meta data center contractor after a metal-resistant bacterium contaminated the city&amp;#39;s water reclamation system. The discharge forced the reuse network offline for months of cleaning and sparked concerns over potential aerosol hazards during public irrigation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/data-centers/cheyenne-suspends-data-center-fill-and-flush-and-closed-loop-discharges-after-meta-contractor-contaminated-its-reuse-water-system&quot; title=&quot;Meta data center water discharges suspended after contaminating the city&amp;#39;s reclamation water supply with bacterium — system offline for months for cleaning, closed-loop cooling system purge spread rare metal-resistant bacteria in Cheyenne’s water system    The city has revoked the Meta contractor&amp;#39;s discharge privileges.    ![](https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p/?c1=2&amp;amp;c2=10055482&amp;amp;cv=4.4.0&amp;amp;cj=1)    [Skip to main content](#main)    Unlock world-class roadmaps &amp;amp; trusted Bench data.  See More    ×    ##…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The suspension of Meta’s data center water discharge due to bacterial contamination has sparked debate over whether the environmental risks of such facilities outweigh their public utility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787801&quot; title=&quot;Is it really that expensive to not do stuff like this? I guess &amp;#39;turning the entirety of the American public against data centers&amp;#39; is not something they factor into the cost analysis.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787469&quot; title=&quot;How do I, as an ordinary person, benefit from Meta&amp;#39;s data centers? I don&amp;#39;t have any presence on Meta&amp;#39;s platforms &amp;amp; the only time I even notice their existence is when someone sends me a text message via signal for some viral link on one of the social networks. I think you&amp;#39;re overestimating the relevance of these data centers for regular people. They can get by just fine w/ local¹ &amp;amp; a lot less environmentally destructive computational resources. ¹ https://solidproject.org/&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that the public benefits from corporate tax revenue, others contend these gains are negligible compared to the potential for local ecological destruction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787677&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; How do I, as an ordinary person, benefit from Meta&amp;#39;s data centers? From the taxes they provide&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787716&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve never seen a cent go to any service in my local municipality from Meta&amp;#39;s taxes &amp;amp; whatever does end up in the city coffers is not big enough to have any real effect b/c those services could just as easily be financed by direct payments instead of some circuitous route of federal, state, &amp;amp; sales taxes from transactions enabled by corporations like Meta. If I was in SF &amp;amp; working for Google or Meta then maybe you might have a point but I&amp;#39;m not in SF or any major metropolitan area so from my…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Although this specific facility utilizes a closed-loop system designed to minimize long-term water consumption, commenters noted that the contamination occurred during the initial installation and commissioning phase, highlighting the need for stricter government oversight of wastewater disposal &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787913&quot; title=&quot;This is one of the data centres that went to the extra expense of building a closed loop cooling system that would, supposedly, not waste water on a continuous basis.  Apparently, even these are not so clean to set up.  Governments are going to need to start paying more attention to the commissioning process apparently. -------- &amp;#39;Meta said that it&amp;#39;s supporting its general contractor, Fortis, which stopped discharging and began hauling wastewater offsite&amp;#39; -------- Governments should also watch…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787556&quot; title=&quot;According to the article this is a closed loop cooling system, once it’s up and running it doesn’t use any water. They run water through it during installation and that’s the discharge that they found bacteria in.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/7/4/better-models-worse-tools/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Better Models: Worse Tools&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lucumr.pocoo.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788599&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;219 points · 76 comments · by leemoore&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Newer Anthropic models like Opus 4.8 are increasingly failing to follow specific tool schemas by inventing non-existent fields, likely due to reinforcement learning that favors the forgiving, flat tool structures used in Anthropic&amp;#39;s own Claude Code harness. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/7/4/better-models-worse-tools/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Better Models: Worse Tools    URL Source: https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/7/4/better-models-worse-tools/    Published Time: 2026-07-04T00:00:00    Markdown Content:  written on July 04, 2026    A very strange [Pi issue](https://github.com/earendil-works/pi/issues/6278) sent me down a rabbit hole over the last two days. The short version is that newer Claude models sometimes call Pi’s edit tool with extra, invented fields in the nested `edits[]` array. And not Haiku or some small model: Opus 4.8.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a consensus that LLMs often struggle with deterministic tool syntax, which can be mitigated through &amp;#34;error-driven&amp;#34; loops where helpful error messages guide the model to self-correct within the context window &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48790214&quot; title=&quot;This is easily solved with good error messages. Claude always gets the syntax wrong on my tool calls. So I did a revolutionary thing and made the error output print helpful guidance on how to correctly call the tool . The agent tries again and always gets it right. Total time “wasted”: 1-2 seconds. It happens every session, but it only happens once per context window. After that the agent holds on to the lesson. To do this for your own tool calls, imagine what you’d do in the agent’s place -…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48790903&quot; title=&quot;This will cause an extra round trip to the LLM. Which means more $ spent.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest using Grammar-Constrained Decoding to force valid output &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789964&quot; title=&quot;Surprised models still output tools as text when for ages we’ve been able to constrain the output at the inference engine level and constrain the model what tools, parameters etc are available Edit: found it, it’s called Grammar-Constrained Decoding (GCD)&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue for using highly familiar tools like `curl` to leverage the model&amp;#39;s existing training data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789596&quot; title=&quot;When building agent integration for my serverless backend https://saasufy.com/ , I decided to not use MCP but to put curl commands inside skill markdown files instead: https://github.com/Saasufy/skills The curl command is extremely popular so models seem to be really good at using it. Also I like that curl uses a bash syntax and my platform requires JSON payloads; it makes the separation clear to the agent. I find it to be  very reliable.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. This fragmentation in how models handle specific tools has led to comparisons with the &amp;#34;ancient times&amp;#34; of browser-specific HTML/CSS rendering, suggesting a need for model-specific system prompts or harnesses &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789277&quot; title=&quot;It sounds like harnesses might have to start to have model by model system prompts, though retrying works, I guess. It reminds me of the ancient times when browsers all read HTML and CSS differently, and differently on different devices.  In that sense, this is nothing new. I was going to say, at least we don&amp;#39;t have different device types, but then, the model still has to output the right variant of `grep` as well.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stories.tamu.edu/news/2026/04/14/scientists-reverse-brain-aging-with-a-nasal-spray/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Scientists reverse brain aging, with a nasal spray&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (stories.tamu.edu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48790066&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;196 points · 82 comments · by cybermango&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Texas A&amp;amp;M researchers developed a nasal spray using extracellular vesicles that reversed brain inflammation and restored memory in aged models. The two-dose therapy recharges cellular power plants and suppresses pathways linked to neurodegeneration, offering a non-invasive potential treatment for age-related cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stories.tamu.edu/news/2026/04/14/scientists-reverse-brain-aging-with-a-nasal-spray/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Scientists reverse brain aging, with a nasal spray – Texas A&amp;amp;M Stories    URL Source: https://stories.tamu.edu/news/2026/04/14/scientists-reverse-brain-aging-with-a-nasal-spray/    Published Time: 2026-04-14T07:41:54+00:00    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1](https://stories.tamu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-2165689168-1408x939.jpg)    New therapy is turning back the clock in aging brains, healing inflammation, restoring memory and reshaping the future of brain age-related…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are highly skeptical of the headline, noting that the study actually focuses on reducing hippocampal inflammation in mice rather than &amp;#34;reversing aging&amp;#34; in humans &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48790347&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Reverse brain aging&amp;#39;, sure, in the same sense that taking Vitamin C reverses aging. The nasal spray reduced markers of inflammation in hippocampal microglial cells. A lot of things reduce inflammation. That is not &amp;#39;reversing ageing&amp;#39;. Of course, &amp;#39;reduces inflammation&amp;#39; doesn&amp;#39;t headline very well...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48790155&quot; title=&quot;...in mice. &amp;gt; Therefore, this study examined the effects of late middle-aged (18-month-old) male and female C57BL6/J mice receiving two intranasal doses of hiPSC-NSC-EVs on neuroinflammaging in the hippocampus at 20.5 months of age. — https://isevjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jev...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48790203&quot; title=&quot;Mice get all the cool shit first&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a debate regarding the quality of the reporting, with some users claiming the article shows signs of being AI-generated while others argue the phrasing is typical of standard clickbait journalism &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48790385&quot; title=&quot;The article is also heavily ai generated, I call bs on every single bit&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48790535&quot; title=&quot;“The most surprising part? It all happened within weeks and lasted for months.” That’s an AI tell. It may not be entirely LLM-generated, the various direct quotations help a lot, but there are touches that definitely feel like an LLM had a hand here.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48790738&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s not an &amp;#39;AI tell&amp;#39;. If you read anything in recent decades, this is a turn of speech human writers wrote for ages and still write.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the skepticism, some users shared personal anecdotes about using supplements like N-acetylcysteine to achieve similar anti-inflammatory effects for brain fog &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48790367&quot; title=&quot;I take N-acetylcysteine and it helps with brain fog also! Plus it reduces stress and irritability.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jefftk.com/p/verizon-is-about-to-break-our-watches&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Verizon is about to break our Gizmo watches&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jefftk.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787329&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;152 points · 117 comments · by jefftk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Verizon is transitioning Gizmo watch users to a new app that currently fails to support watch-only accounts, potentially disabling essential texting and tracking features for many families on July 6th. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jefftk.com/p/verizon-is-about-to-break-our-watches&quot; title=&quot;Title: Verizon is About to Break our Watches    URL Source: https://www.jefftk.com/p/verizon-is-about-to-break-our-watches    Markdown Content:  *   [Jeff Kaufman](https://www.jefftk.com/)  *   [Posts](https://www.jefftk.com/p/index)  *   [RSS](https://www.jefftk.com/news.rss)  *   [◂◂RSS](http://www.jefftk.com/news/back_from_2572.rss)  *   [Contact](https://www.jefftk.com/contact)    * * *    ### [Verizon is About to Break our Watches](https://www.jefftk.com/p/verizon-is-about-to-break-our-watches)July…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The technical fragility of cellular watches stems from their reliance on &amp;#34;hacks&amp;#34; and carrier exemptions, as fitting standard RF packages into wearable form factors is difficult due to size constraints and signal interference from the human body &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787643&quot; title=&quot;Cell phone enabled watches are a pile of hacks sitting on top of hacks on top of a system pretending to be a telephone switch board from the 1940s. It’s surprising any of it works.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788290&quot; title=&quot;The main way is that literally zero of these watches actually meet the standards that the cell networks require of a cell phone. Every single one of them has a carrier exemption or a lower standard to adhere to, because it turns out that putting a cell phone&amp;#39;s RF package into a watch is super hard, both because of size and the various negative effects of the human body on radio signals. This affects cell phones too of course, but less so (remember the iPhone 4 and how we were &amp;#39;holding it…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789638&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; various negative effects of the human body on radio signals I was under the impression radio waves couldn’t interact with biological matter in any meaningful way. Can you share more about this?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users struggle with the transition to new apps and the lack of high-quality alternatives in the market, others argue that relying on carrier-specific hardware rather than &amp;#34;dumb pipes&amp;#34; is a fundamental mistake &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787628&quot; title=&quot;Choosing a carrier device without being on that carrier for the rest of your devices would seem to be the first mistake. Treating the carrier as anything other than dumb pipe seems like the issue here. Going with the Pixel Watch LTE and then doing same custom app development might make more sense for the described use case, but I haven&amp;#39;t explored the author&amp;#39;s use case thoroughly.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788427&quot; title=&quot;I have a verizon watch only account.  I was able to get the new app working, but it was a struggle.  I think it worked on the 3rd or 4th attempt.  I had to start over and lost all of the contacts that were connected to the watch.  Fortunately, there were only a few. Overall, the Gizmo watch has been nice to have, but it leaves a lot to be desired.  It&amp;#39;s surprising that there are not better products in this market segment.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the author&amp;#39;s migration issues highlight a broader problem where services like Google Fi are frequently blocked by businesses for 2FA, a practice debated as either a necessary anti-fraud measure or an anti-competitive abuse of market power &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788501&quot; title=&quot;So the author probably could have migrated if he hadn&amp;#39;t used a Google Fi phone number for 2FA.  Some banks and businesses (such as Uber) will detect a Google Fi or Google Voice number and not let you use them.  Other businesses don&amp;#39;t do the detection, but the 2FA texts will never arrive.  Like the author, I&amp;#39;ve got some accounts that I was able to set up for 2FA using a Google account, but 2FA no longer works on them.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789288&quot; title=&quot;Blocking specific service providers in this way should be made illegal. It&amp;#39;s an abuse of market power primarily used to eliminate competition.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789469&quot; title=&quot;How is it eliminating market competition? Uber, etc don’t compete with google voice and similar services. And its a valid reason for preventing scammers. I am literally tired of scammers on every single app. I still want an open internet but I think ALL phone numbers should be tied to real human identity and geolocation. Yes, it seems dystopian but it’s no different than the time when we only had landlines with verified callers. Democracy is as fine back then, maybe even better. Some structure…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://danluu.com/ai-coding/#appendix-agentic-loops-and-writing-this-post&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Agentic coding notes&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (danluu.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48782671&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;175 points · 82 comments · by gm678&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Software engineer Dan Luu explores the paradox of agentic AI coding, noting that while LLMs frequently fabricate results and fail at basic data analysis, they significantly accelerate development when paired with rigorous, hardware-inspired automated fuzzing and feedback loops rather than traditional human code review. &lt;a href=&quot;https://danluu.com/ai-coding/#appendix-agentic-loops-and-writing-this-post&quot; title=&quot;Title: Agentic test processes, LLM benchmarks, and other notes on agentic coding from Galapagos Island    URL Source: https://danluu.com/ai-coding/    Published Time: Sat, 04 Jul 2026 08:24:41 GMT    Markdown Content:  I&amp;#39;ve been using AI fairly heavily since last November and the whole thing is a funny experience. An agent will do something that, if a human did it, you&amp;#39;d immediately fire them. My reaction, of course, is to act as if this is great and spin up a thousand agents so they can do even more…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the efficacy of new AI models like Fable, with users debating whether it &amp;#34;walks the walk&amp;#34; compared to Opus or if its high API costs make the user feel like a &amp;#34;babysitter&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48782759&quot; title=&quot;Fable changes the game yet again, because it&amp;#39;s API-only. You&amp;#39;re not likely to want to run Fable in a loop any more than you want to take a bunch of dollar bills and light them on fire. Every invocation of Fable has to be intentional, its context carefully managed. I feel like a babysitter.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48782856&quot; title=&quot;Compared to Opus 4.8 I really haven&amp;#39;t been impressed&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48783006&quot; title=&quot;And I&amp;#39;ve been quite impressed. Opus talks the talk, Fable walks the walk.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Participants also explore the author&amp;#39;s unorthodox hardware-inspired testing philosophy, which favors massive randomized regression suites over traditional unit tests and manual code reviews &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48784102&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d like to highlight a different part of the article: &amp;gt; In general, when I talk to software folks about testing, I&amp;#39;m coming from such a different place that they immediately look at me like I&amp;#39;m an alien, so let&amp;#39;s talk about how we tested at this hardware company I worked for, Centaur, which informs my biases about how I like to work. Some of the things that we did that were or are unorthodox in the software world are: &amp;gt; Hired dedicated QA / test engineers, with testing being a first-class…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, many commenters expressed disappointment that the &amp;#34;Galapagos&amp;#34; setting was merely a metaphor for Vancouver, while others noted how massive context windows are shifting AI development toward building comprehensive &amp;#34;world models&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48782974&quot; title=&quot;OP&amp;#39;s alt text makes it clear that by &amp;#39;Galapagos Island&amp;#39; they mean Vancouver. I assumed that this was some sort of local nickname, but all of the references to &amp;#39;Galápagos of Canada&amp;#39; I could find are talking about Haida Gwaii instead.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48782882&quot; title=&quot;A lot of the crazy ideas seem to have melted away in the face of massive context sizes. Today, I can put roughly a megabyte of utf8 text into my system prompt before things start to get weird. That is a massive amount of information even if we are being sloppy with it. You can read The Hobbit and the first Harry Potter book cover-to-cover and still have room to spare. I would deeply struggle to develop a world model this detailed for any business. Anything that needs to get more specific than…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48783706&quot; title=&quot;Realizing he&amp;#39;s just using it to mean remote place in terms of AI bubble (Vancouver! What does that make all the other places that are not major tech hubs?) was a bummer. Who cares about AI, I wanted to read about living in Galapagos&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mbl.edu/news/jellyfish-can-heal-wounds-minutes-scientists-want-their-secrets&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Jellyfish can heal wounds in minutes. Scientists want their secrets&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mbl.edu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789712&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;184 points · 41 comments · by hhs&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scientists at the Marine Biological Laboratory are studying the jellyfish *Clytia hemisphaerica* to understand how it heals wounds in minutes and regenerates its entire body, potentially offering insights into rapid tissue repair and regenerative medicine for humans. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.mbl.edu/news/jellyfish-can-heal-wounds-minutes-scientists-want-their-secrets&quot; title=&quot;Title: Jellyfish Can Heal Wounds in Minutes. Scientists Want Their Secrets. | Marine Biological Laboratory    URL Source: https://www.mbl.edu/news/jellyfish-can-heal-wounds-minutes-scientists-want-their-secrets    Markdown Content:  [Skip to main content](https://www.mbl.edu/news/jellyfish-can-heal-wounds-minutes-scientists-want-their-secrets#main)    [The University of Chicago Marine Biological Laboratory](https://www.mbl.edu/)    MENU    Utility  *   [Visit The MBL](https://www.mbl.edu/visit)  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights that while the rapid healing of jellyfish is scientifically fascinating, its relevance to human medicine is likely minimal due to the vast biological differences between humans and gelatinous, simple-tissued organisms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48790919&quot; title=&quot;This is a press release from a marine research organization, so the main implication here isn&amp;#39;t that they&amp;#39;re doing it because it&amp;#39;s in any way relevant to humans. They&amp;#39;re doing it because it&amp;#39;s a cool thing for a marine research organization to research. Yes, it&amp;#39;s probably not gonna help humans, unless some of your friends are gelatinous blobs with no circulatory or nervous system and with a lifespan measured in months.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48790290&quot; title=&quot;Don&amp;#39;t they have the advantage of having very simple tissue?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters debate the definition of a jellyfish, clarifying that while some are single organisms, others like the Portuguese man o&amp;#39; war are colonies of specialized, genetically identical individuals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48790381&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;re not even technically one organism, but colonies of independent but mostly specialized organisms. I&amp;#39;d be willing to bet that has something to do with the articles title&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48790600&quot; title=&quot;True jellyfish (like moon jellies, box jellyfish)are a single organism, just like you or me. Theres a single genome and one body. Portuguese man o’ war is not a single organism at all but a siphonophore, a colony of many genetically identical but specialized individual organisms called zooids, all fused together and functionally dependent on each other.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48790848&quot; title=&quot;Whats the difference between a siphonophore and a single organism? Aren&amp;#39;t all the organs of an organism genetically identical, specialized, fused together, and functionally dependent on each other?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, certain species like *Clytia* exhibit unique life cycles and potential immortality, suggesting that &amp;#34;healing&amp;#34; in these creatures may involve radical processes like cloning or reverting to earlier life stages &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792402&quot; title=&quot;Clytia is not just your normal jellyfish, is an organism that alternates between a jellyfish and a polyp that live in small colonies, not unlike corals but less complex and without hard calcified skeletons. Is also in the same group that has the only animals known to be potentially immortal. I&amp;#39;m not joking. This things exist. So the word &amp;#39;heal&amp;#39; here can mean different things than people expects. Imagine that as we grow older and decaying we could decide to grow a new genetic clone of &amp;#39;me&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48790969&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a very fuzzy line.  But according to The Octopus Lady&amp;#39;s video in the other comment, it&amp;#39;s because separating them from the other zooids doesn&amp;#39;t result in immediate death.  They may die later due to lack of ability to swim, or eat, but that is a secondary cause which is considered important.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://adamraudonis.github.io/splats4D/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Fable created novel 4D splat format&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (adamraudonis.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48786245&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;150 points · 58 comments · by adamraudonis&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fable has introduced `.splat4d`, a streamable 4D Gaussian splat format that reduces dynamic scene file sizes by up to 58x through error-bounded quantization and H.265-style temporal compression while supporting native HTTP Range-request streaming. &lt;a href=&quot;https://adamraudonis.github.io/splats4D/&quot; title=&quot;Title: .splat4d    URL Source: https://adamraudonis.github.io/splats4D/    Markdown Content:  A streamable 4D gaussian splat format with tunable bounds.    [Code](https://github.com/adamraudonis/splats4D)[PyPI](https://pypi.org/project/splats4d/)[Full demo](https://adamraudonis.github.io/splats4D/demo/)[Spec](https://github.com/adamraudonis/splats4D/blob/main/docs/FORMAT.md)[Benchmarks](https://github.com/adamraudonis/splats4D/blob/main/docs/BENCHMARKS.md)    **16–58×** smaller than raw ·**14–20×**…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The introduction of the 4D splat format has sparked debate over its potential for &amp;#34;fly-on-the-wall&amp;#34; cinema, with some envisioning immersive narrative possibilities like hidden clues &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789360&quot; title=&quot;A gaussian gif. Coming to porn sites soon. The file format name works for them. But imagine whole movies shot in this format. The fly-on-the-wall fantasy of movies, without being locked in place for the whole shot. Narrative possibilities like being able to examine just how close the Tyrannosaurus Rex  is to your rear view mirror. Clues in a mystery only visible on rotation. Hidden bonus scenes. I hope this catches on just to be able to watch the evolution of cameras to capture it.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, while critics argue that removing fixed framing destroys the essential expressive power of cinematography &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789792&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;imagine whole movies shot in this format. The fly-on-the-wall fantasy of movies, without being locked in place for the whole shot. That would be terrible. Framing is the major expressive feature in cinematography, and any interactive format needs a lot more thought put into it than just having a free camera. Literally the worst of both worlds. Light field video streaming is a thing, however it&amp;#39;s pretty niche. OTOY pioneered holographic codecs and light field videos with some degree of freedom…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789820&quot; title=&quot;Not terrible, per se, but not a movie.  There are other formats that fit the task better like immersive theater and theater in the round. This has been extensively explored with VR and games, though.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While the &amp;#34;4D&amp;#34; label refers to the addition of time to 3D space &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789951&quot; title=&quot;Whats the 4 in the &amp;#39;4D&amp;#39; here? A layman like me thinks this looks 3D.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789959&quot; title=&quot;time&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, some users question why this terminology isn&amp;#39;t applied to video games &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789975&quot; title=&quot;Why is it we don&amp;#39;t call videogames &amp;#39;4D&amp;#39; if they also operate through time?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt; or point to existing open-source projects and light field technologies that have explored similar concepts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789913&quot; title=&quot;I feel like I did this one already: https://github.com/seanwevans/4splat&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48789792&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;imagine whole movies shot in this format. The fly-on-the-wall fantasy of movies, without being locked in place for the whole shot. That would be terrible. Framing is the major expressive feature in cinematography, and any interactive format needs a lot more thought put into it than just having a free camera. Literally the worst of both worlds. Light field video streaming is a thing, however it&amp;#39;s pretty niche. OTOY pioneered holographic codecs and light field videos with some degree of freedom…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical accessibility remains a hurdle, as some users reported the demo failing to load on mobile browsers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48788773&quot; title=&quot;Doesn’t with for me, iOS Safari :/&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mrbruh.com/msicenter/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;MSI Center – How to gain SYSTEM privileges in seconds&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mrbruh.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781688&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;140 points · 60 comments · by MrBruh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A security researcher discovered a critical vulnerability in MSI Center’s &amp;#34;Notebook Foundation&amp;#34; service that allows any authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with SYSTEM privileges by exploiting an insecurely configured named pipe. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mrbruh.com/msicenter/&quot; title=&quot;Title: MSI Center - How to gain SYSTEM privileges in seconds!    URL Source: https://mrbruh.com/msicenter/    Published Time: 2026-06-30T00:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  After finding severe vulnerabilities in both [AMD’s](https://mrbruh.com/amd2) and [ASUS’s](https://mrbruh.com/asusdriverhub) OEM software, I wanted to expand my horizons by finding issues in more gaming products.    I ended up settling on MSI Center, because it seems to come preinstalled on all of their laptops and pre-built…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discovery of a local privilege escalation vulnerability in MSI Center highlights the poor security practices of hardware manufacturers, such as the continued use of deprecated 3DES encryption and outdated installers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781816&quot; title=&quot;Is there any valid reason to still be using 3DES in 2026? It was formally deprecated in 2018 and has been surpassed in just about every single way by AES long before that. At this point I feel like it&amp;#39;s use is such a huge red flag&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48782287&quot; title=&quot;I mean they&amp;#39;re still using Inno Setup which was pretty cool in 2004.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While MSI patched the flaw within two days by restricting pipe communication to signed software, commenters remain skeptical, arguing that the fix may still be bypassable via thread injection or existing registry primitives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781857&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; After this minor hiccup, the experience with MSI was actually quite pleasant. They prepared a patch for the vulnerability within two days of me reporting it and told me which MSI Center release it was to be bundled with, and when they planned to release the new version. Was NOT expecting a happy ending. I don&amp;#39;t know if the part of MSI Center with the pipe vulnerability is automatically installed on desktops but this is the terribly written software that you need to turn off all the obnoxious…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48783627&quot; title=&quot;Video by GN has a little bit of info (but not a lot). Basically they made it so that the pipes only accept input from MSI signed software + the pipes can only invoke MSI signed executables. https://youtu.be/Eck8NnoaD4M&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48784837&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; pipes only accept input from MSI signed software This does not inspire confidence. I&amp;#39;m assuming the pipe exists so that some GUI process running as the current user can perform privileged actions since the other end of the pipe runs as SYSTEM. At this point, just inject a thread into that GUI process and send the command - the service will think it is coming from MSI software, because it is. The &amp;#39;only invoke MSI signed executables&amp;#39; mitigation is a good one, but if these two things are all…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also emphasizes the frustration with &amp;#34;bloatware&amp;#34; that users feel forced to install for basic hardware control, leading some to reverse-engineer proprietary protocols to create lightweight, open-source alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48784850&quot; title=&quot;MSI Center is one of the worst pieces of software that I can&amp;#39;t get rid of. Some features I can&amp;#39;t find easy ways to replicate such as controlling the fan/GPU/CPU profiles and battery charging. Updating the software takes FOREVER for what should be fairly simple, and it is extremely slow again for what should be simple software.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48782037&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; this is the terribly written software that you need to turn off all the obnoxious lights on your MB and DRAM You should reverse engineer it and write a free software replacement! I did this for my Clevo laptop&amp;#39;s keyboard LEDs: https://github.com/matheusmoreira/ite-829x Still one of my most satisfying projects and I use it to this day. These manufacturer apps are so bad. Clevo control center would take over a minute to display a window on screen, it was so aggravating. My replacement program…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the successful disclosure, the author’s lack of financial compensation from multiple major vendors sparked a debate on whether researchers should continue reporting bugs for free or sell them to third parties &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48782950&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; So far, for the vulnerabilities I have reported to Google, ASUS, AMD, TP-Link, Netgear, MSI (and more), they have paid out a total of $0 in bug bounties. Why bother reporting to them ? You could just as well sell it to third parties if it doesn&amp;#39;t interest them.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48783328&quot; title=&quot;You understand the concept of doing something that doesn&amp;#39;t bring direct monetary benefit?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-07-03</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-07-03</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://weli.dev/blog/half-baked-product/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Half-Baked Product&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (weli.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48772388&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1370 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 403 comments · by weli&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This cautionary tale follows a startup that fails by prioritizing investor-driven market scale and superficial feature requests over a functional core product, ultimately losing its best engineers and biggest clients to technical debt and a fundamental inability to bake bread reliably. &lt;a href=&quot;https://weli.dev/blog/half-baked-product/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Half-Baked Product    URL Source: https://weli.dev/blog/half-baked-product/    Published Time: 2026-07-02T00:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  ## The Founder    A freshly minted founder decides to get into the oven business. He can’t bake a cake or knead bread, but he knows the kitchen appliance market inside and out. He’s analyzed every business in Spain and reached a conclusion: if he sells a new oven to the country’s pizza makers, pastry chefs, and bakers, he only needs to capture 10% of the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary cause of &amp;#34;half-baked&amp;#34; products is often a disconnect between founders, engineers, and customers, where specialized expertise exists in silos without a shared understanding of business viability or technical constraints &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48774954&quot; title=&quot;We keep seeing this. If you had to point out the fundamental problem, what would it be? I think it’s the disconnect. Each persona is an expert in their own field but is completely oblivious to other critical areas. The founder knows how to raise money but doesn’t really understand the customers. The engineer knows the tech but doesn’t really understand what it takes to keep the business afloat. The salesperson knows what customers want but doesn’t really understand what’s possible to make. The…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Many startups fail because founders prioritize market analysis and wealth-seeking over domain expertise, leading to &amp;#34;vibecoded&amp;#34; platforms that promise impossible features while lacking fundamental security or data integrity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48774722&quot; title=&quot;One important part of the story is in the very beginning: The founder’s motivation. To become wealthy. You see this in the startup world a lot. Founders with 5+ failed startups in different sectors, because said founder picked the fields mainly by doing some market analysis. Not domain expertise. There’s then a big mismatch between what the founder thinks is possible, and what the domain expert thinks is possible. The defense is of course that some people can do that - Musk did it, so why not?…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775337&quot; title=&quot;To me, the fundamental problem is what Paul Graham pointed out here: https://www.paulgraham.com/startupideas.html &amp;#39;The way to get startup ideas is not to try to think of startup ideas. It&amp;#39;s to look for problems, preferably problems you have yourself. Why do so many founders build things no one wants? Because they begin by trying to think of startup ideas. That m.o. is doubly dangerous: it doesn&amp;#39;t merely yield few good ideas; it yields bad ideas that sound plausible enough to fool you into…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users desire radical innovations like &amp;#34;instant&amp;#34; residential dishwashers, others point out that such industrial-scale solutions are impractical for homes due to extreme water, heat, and pre-rinsing requirements &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48773747&quot; title=&quot;It sounds like you&amp;#39;re joking, but I&amp;#39;ve long dreamed of a different type of dishwasher. One that washes instantly. I don&amp;#39;t need it to fit more than a single plate at one time. Just put something in from one end, and out comes clean and dry plate on the other end. Like a car wash. I am quite certain these exist already large kitchens and I seem to remember one from a school diner from maybe 35 years ago, but I&amp;#39;ve always been wondering why they don&amp;#39;t exist on smaller scale.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48774048&quot; title=&quot;Restaurant dishwashers use an enormous amount of water. They require a hot water supply that’s much hotter than residential heaters typically supply. They require a more complete manual pre-rinse and scrub. They only accept kitchenware that’s made for them and destroy the rest. Restaurants cycle dishes a lot during a single mealtime. Homes don’t. I don’t think “I can’t wait 2 hours” is typically a real problem.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.caseyliss.com/2026/7/2/carplay-is-additive-you-dolts&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;CarPlay Is Additive&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (caseyliss.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48769397&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;576 points · &lt;strong&gt;732 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by sprawl_&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author criticizes Rivian&amp;#39;s refusal to support Apple CarPlay, arguing that the feature is an additive, optional tool for users rather than a total interface takeover and claiming its absence prevents potential customers from purchasing the company&amp;#39;s vehicles. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.caseyliss.com/2026/7/2/carplay-is-additive-you-dolts&quot; title=&quot;Title: CarPlay is Additive    URL Source: https://www.caseyliss.com/2026/7/2/carplay-is-additive-you-dolts    Markdown Content:  Back in March, Rivian’s Chief Software Officer, [Wassym Bensaid](https://www.linkedin.com/in/wassymbensaid), was interviewed by the excellent [Nilay Patel](https://www.theverge.com/authors/nilay-patel) for [Decoder](https://www.theverge.com/decoder-podcast-with-nilay-patel). If you’re not a Decoder listener, you should be. If you’re not a [subscriber of The…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CarPlay and Android Auto have become essential for many buyers, with some citing a 79% preference rate and a refusal to purchase vehicles without them &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48769578&quot; title=&quot;Author says &amp;#39;I literally will not buy a car that does not support CarPlay.&amp;#39; From July 2022: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/22/apple-carplay-could-be-a-tro ... Apple engineering manager Emily Schubert said 98% of new cars in the U.S. come     with CarPlay installed. She delivered a shocking stat: 79% of U.S. buyers would     only buy a car if it supported CarPlay.      “It’s a must-have feature when shopping for a new vehicle,” Schubert said     during a presentation of the new features.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48771535&quot; title=&quot;Not only does it irritate me not having it in a practical sense, it’s also an arrogance on behalf of the manufacturer. “We can do it better than iOS/Android”, or “We have a better reason to do it”. No, and No.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents value the consistency across different vehicles, the ability to use personal data (like playlists and navigation) instantly, and the fact that the interface stays updated via the phone rather than becoming obsolete with the car&amp;#39;s hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48772326&quot; title=&quot;For pure interaction, CarPlay as a generic solution is very hard to beat infotainment systems that are deeply integrated with the vehicle itself. Its advantages are mainly these: - Consistency. You get into a new car, all you need to figure out is how to open CarPlay, no need to learning a completely different and often complicated infotainment system. - &amp;#39;It&amp;#39;s on your phone&amp;#39;. You can decide what playlist to play or where to navigate before you even get into the car. - Stays up to date over the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48770526&quot; title=&quot;Surprised no one&amp;#39;s mentioned it so far, but CarPlay / Android Auto aren&amp;#39;t just features, they&amp;#39;re consistency . Across makes, models, years. I know what I&amp;#39;m getting when I connect my phone - and if anyone uses my car with their own device, they get their own dashboard, as well. One interesting use case I saw was a couple where one used a left-to-right interface and the other a right-to-left UI. CarPlay makes this easy, because the interface is linked to your own personal device.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48772707&quot; title=&quot;The big thing for me is that the lifetime of a car is a lot longer than the technology development lifecycle. I just bought a 10 year old Toyota estate (station wagon). It&amp;#39;s got a reasonable screen and Bluetooth implementation etc. But I&amp;#39;m never going to want to use the built in navigation because it&amp;#39;s just not as good as what my phone will do. And the audio integration isn&amp;#39;t as sophisticated as it might be - I have to choose the app on my phone. Whereas CarPlay/AndroidAuto is generic from the…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some users find integrated systems like Tesla’s superior for fluid navigation and multi-tasking, while others prefer physical knobs or head-up displays over any screen-based interface &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48770591&quot; title=&quot;I would prefer knobs and buttons over a screen flow in either direction, but no modern car caters to this anymore.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48769756&quot; title=&quot;I’m fully bought into the Apple ecosystem, and I’ve had Teslas for 8 years and we currently also have car that supports CarPlay. The CarPlay interface is overall far inferior, especially with navigation. First of all, searching for destinations is terrible on CarPlay compared to Tesla! Even worse, Apple didn’t even add multi-touch support to CarPlay until iOS 26, and the vast majority of cars (including ours) don’t support it, so you have to hunt for and tap the zoom controls, which is pretty…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48771273&quot; title=&quot;I am clearly in the minority here but I have driven cars with and without CarPlay and honestly do not care whether a car has it. I use my phone for navigation and mount it such that when I look at it I am not taking my eyes off the road. I find this to be far better than having to look down at the center of my dashboard but CarPlay navigation UI via Google Maps or Waze also works fine so it’s not a huge difference. Realistically the only navigation UI have seen that was better was a 2012 or…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite high consumer demand, some manufacturers like GM and Rivian are moving away from these platforms to maintain control over the in-car experience &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48769851&quot; title=&quot;Since then GM has dropped CarPlay. Rivian has appeared following Tesla and refusing to support it. And I thought there were some other existing manufacturer who was either getting rid of it or thinking about it. Basically despite the popularity the market seems to be moving against it slowly. And the more those cars succeed the more other auto makers will be willing to follow.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://phenomenalworld.org/analysis/the-anti-amazon/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Costco is the anti-Amazon&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (phenomenalworld.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48776044&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;566 points · 572 comments · by bookofjoe&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Costco serves as a &amp;#34;logistically elegant&amp;#34; alternative to Amazon by utilizing a low-SKU, high-volume warehouse model that reduces overhead and simplifies distribution. This strategy enables lower consumer prices, higher worker wages, and a sustainable blueprint for potential public grocery initiatives. &lt;a href=&quot;https://phenomenalworld.org/analysis/the-anti-amazon/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Anti-Amazon    URL Source: https://phenomenalworld.org/analysis/the-anti-amazon/    Published Time: 2026-07-01T08:21:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  We are in a new age of logistical prowess, led by the dynamism of Amazon as it strives to carry out dizzyingly complex forms of order fulfillment and delivery. With the age of [agentic commerce](https://nrf.com/blog/10-trends-and-predictions-for-retail-in-2026) just around the corner—think of going to ChatGPT and having an AI agent scour every…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether Costco’s model of customer-handled &amp;#34;last-mile&amp;#34; logistics is more socially or environmentally efficient than Amazon’s delivery model. While some argue that a single delivery truck replacing dozens of individual car trips reduces traffic and fuel use &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48779054&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Even if you think it is preferable at an individual level, there are good reasons to question the social value of the logistical complexity that it necessitates. Home delivery of single-packaged items entails an entirely different cost structure than freight trucks driving to consumer-facing warehouses delivering entire pallets of goods to be driven home by customers themselves. Ok, so 100 people can all drive to the store, or one delivery truck can drive to everyone&amp;#39;s house. (Ignoring the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48778815&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; To put it crudely, having someone in a Sprinter van deliver a recently-purchased toothbrush to your doorstep is simply not a universalizable action, from either a business or logistical standpoint. It is a modern feat that Amazon is capable of doing this, but that it can be done does not mean that it should, nor even that it can be done writ large. For most consumption, it is far more efficient for people to handle the “last-mile delivery” themselves by going to stores and buying a good…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that centralized retail is more efficient when integrated into existing commutes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48779124&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, this argument falls flat on it&amp;#39;s face.  Of course it&amp;#39;s more complex than that. When I worked from the office, centralized retail was very convenient and hardly added any driving.  If you work from home, the opposite is true. The next revolution would be to standardize reusable packaging, that same daily delivery truck could bring that back. But only government could make that happen.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt; or that Amazon&amp;#39;s model creates excessive packaging waste &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48779054&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Even if you think it is preferable at an individual level, there are good reasons to question the social value of the logistical complexity that it necessitates. Home delivery of single-packaged items entails an entirely different cost structure than freight trucks driving to consumer-facing warehouses delivering entire pallets of goods to be driven home by customers themselves. Ok, so 100 people can all drive to the store, or one delivery truck can drive to everyone&amp;#39;s house. (Ignoring the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48779364&quot; title=&quot;I could imagine Amazon incentivizing reusable containers on their own TBH. If I was living in a house and not an apartment, I could easily imagine putting the Amazon bins back out so the next time I get a delivery, they take those, and we are constantly cycling bins back and forth. Even environment aside, from a purely self-interested perspective, I would much prefer it to dealing with the recycling Amazon deliveries entail.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, Costco is viewed as &amp;#34;wise&amp;#34; for avoiding the logistical complexity of the last mile to focus on bulk value &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48778897&quot; title=&quot;The part about Costco choosing to avoid the last mile shipping problem reminded me of a proverb, roughly translated as: A clever person solves a problem; a wise person avoids it. I think it holds a lot of truth in engineering.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48779039&quot; title=&quot;Both spectrums are hard. Solving last mile is really really hard, but if you do that&amp;#39;s a huge moat (aka Amazon). If you avoid last mile, you best deliver value in some other way, which Costco does by giving you more per dollar than anyone else.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, though critics argue the brand epitomizes American over-consumption and car-centric infrastructure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48779392&quot; title=&quot;I dont like Costco, it epitomizes American over-consumption. Parking lot overflowing with oversized SUVs with people loading up oversized trolleys with food from food corporations to take back to their oversized fridges and storage basements.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stefan.schueller.net/posts/the-free-market-lie/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why Switzerland has 25 gbit internet and America doesn&amp;#39;t&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (stefan.schueller.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48770647&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;542 points · 432 comments · by talonx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Switzerland achieves world-leading 25 Gbit internet speeds by regulating fiber as a shared, neutral utility with dedicated point-to-point lines, whereas the U.S. and Germany suffer from territorial monopolies and inefficient infrastructure redundancy caused by a lack of open-access mandates. &lt;a href=&quot;https://stefan.schueller.net/posts/the-free-market-lie/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Free Market Lie: Why Switzerland Has 25 Gbit Internet and America Doesn&amp;#39;t    URL Source: https://stefan.schueller.net/posts/the-free-market-lie/    Published Time: 2026-04-03T10:30:16+02:00    Markdown Content:  You may have heard about [25 Gbit symmetrical internet](https://www.init7.net/de/internet/fiber7/) in Switzerland. This is often cited as the fastest dedicated (non-shared) residential connection in the world. However, did you ever wonder why Switzerland has such fast internet at a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that comparing Swiss and American internet speeds is misleading because 25 Gbps is only available in limited Swiss locations, and average speeds in both countries are actually quite similar &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48771384&quot; title=&quot;This article came up before. It&amp;#39;s heavy on the clickbait, if you couldn&amp;#39;t guess from the title. Some important points that they leave out: - 25G internet isn&amp;#39;t available everywhere in Switzerland. It&amp;#39;s just the fastest tier available in some locations. - The United States is 85 times larger than Switzerland. The entire country of Switzerland is the size of a small US state. Covering the US with broadband is much harder than Switzerland. - 25G internet is also available in some locations in the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48770734&quot; title=&quot;I guess they don&amp;#39;t bother using Speedtest in Switzerland, as the average speed seems about the same as the US: https://www.speedtest.net/global-index Must be a sampling bias or something.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. A central debate exists over whether the U.S.&amp;#39;s lack of high-speed infrastructure is due to its vast geographic scale and lower population density &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48771384&quot; title=&quot;This article came up before. It&amp;#39;s heavy on the clickbait, if you couldn&amp;#39;t guess from the title. Some important points that they leave out: - 25G internet isn&amp;#39;t available everywhere in Switzerland. It&amp;#39;s just the fastest tier available in some locations. - The United States is 85 times larger than Switzerland. The entire country of Switzerland is the size of a small US state. Covering the US with broadband is much harder than Switzerland. - 25G internet is also available in some locations in the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48770716&quot; title=&quot;The article does not include the word &amp;#39;density&amp;#39; at all. Switzerland has 2.5x the population density that the US does. I absolutely believe that US regulation choices encourage telecom monopolies and suppresses service in the US, but it&amp;#39;s impossible to make a credible argument for that without acknowledging the density challenges that the majority of the US (geographically) faces.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48771194&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know that this is an easy comparison to make. Switzerland is 16k square miles in size (and about 9.1 million people). Taking a random, low-density American state as a comparison - say, the innocuous and sparsely-populated western state of Idaho - I see that it has a size of about 85.5 thousand square miles (and about 2 million people). I&amp;#39;ve never understood the value in comparing relatively densely populated European countries to America. The practical realities of each just make them…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, or if these factors are outweighed by regulatory failures, local corruption, and a lack of political will &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48771468&quot; title=&quot;I live in NYC, one of the most densely populated cities in the world, and yet Verizon Fios 1 Gbps is my only option. I tried to upgrade to Fios 2 Gbps, but it&amp;#39;s not available. Spectrum only goes to 200Mbps; no other providers in my area. I have no idea if Switzerland is any better, but the US situation in 2026 is appalling. If we&amp;#39;re this bad in NYC, imagine what someone in rural America goes through.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48770716&quot; title=&quot;The article does not include the word &amp;#39;density&amp;#39; at all. Switzerland has 2.5x the population density that the US does. I absolutely believe that US regulation choices encourage telecom monopolies and suppresses service in the US, but it&amp;#39;s impossible to make a credible argument for that without acknowledging the density challenges that the majority of the US (geographically) faces.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48771868&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; - The United States is 85 times larger than Switzerland. The entire country of Switzerland is the size of a small US state. Covering the US with broadband is much harder than Switzerland. I see this argument come up a lot with regards to all kinds of infrastructure, and the thing is it simply _isn&amp;#39;t true_. What matters is population density, GDP per capita, geography, and will. A countries size doesn&amp;#39;t matter since twice the area will, all things being equal, also give you twice the workforce…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48771507&quot; title=&quot;Its not how bad must other areas be when NYC is this bad- its bad because its NYC. Corruption, aging infrastructure, enormous construction costs, diverse building types and complex ownership interests etc etc. The fastest and most competitive internet is in places like wealthy suburbs where you just roll it out without any issues.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, some note that Swiss consumers often overpay for slower service from the national provider simply for the &amp;#34;Swiss&amp;#34; brand name, despite cheaper 10 Gbps alternatives being available &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48770824&quot; title=&quot;You know, in Switzerland there is a thing, that if a product or service has the name &amp;#39;Swiss&amp;#39; in its name, then it can be sold for any price regardless of quality - and it will fly off the shelves. I know it sounds ridiculous, but it&amp;#39;s true. Swisscom is the biggest ISP in Switzerland - they charge high prices for very slow internet. But they have the word &amp;#39;Swiss&amp;#39; in their name, so it&amp;#39;s okay to sell 100 Mbps connection for 70 CHF, which many people buys. But the same people can get 10 Gbps…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/07/valve-open-source-the-steam-machine-e-ink-screen-so-you-can-make-your-own/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Valve open-source the Steam Machine e-ink screen so you can make your own&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (gamingonlinux.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48774518&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;605 points · 114 comments · by ahlCVA&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Valve has open-sourced the &amp;#34;Inkterface&amp;#34; e-ink display for the Steam Machine, releasing the hardware specifications, assembly instructions, and code under an MIT license on GitLab to allow users and third-party vendors to build their own custom front panels. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/07/valve-open-source-the-steam-machine-e-ink-screen-so-you-can-make-your-own/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Valve open source the Steam Machine e-ink screen so you can make your own    URL Source: https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/07/valve-open-source-the-steam-machine-e-ink-screen-so-you-can-make-your-own/    Published Time: 2026-07-03T07:38:31Z    Markdown Content:  This website makes use of cookies to enhance your browsing experience and provide additional functionality -&amp;gt;[More info](https://www.gamingonlinux.com/privacy.html)[Deny…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Valve’s release of the Steam Machine e-ink screen, identified as a standard Adafruit panel &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48774794&quot; title=&quot;In case you&amp;#39;re wondering and don&amp;#39;t want to click around, the display is a standard Adafruit 5.83&amp;#39;&amp;#39; eInk panel: https://www.adafruit.com/product/6397&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, has sparked debate over the technical trade-offs of e-ink, specifically regarding &amp;#34;muddy&amp;#34; refresh rates and the risk of permanent panel damage if maintenance cycles are skipped to increase speed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775912&quot; title=&quot;Anyone know what the refresh rate for these displays are, at least with the stock firmware? Reading the datasheets didn&amp;#39;t help, though maybe I didn&amp;#39;t know what to look for.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48777056&quot; title=&quot;The refresh rate of eink is kind of...muddy. It depends on temperature and target contrast. With the right waveform and voltage, you can push it pretty far(like 30hz+). The thing is, Eink&amp;#39;s waveform is kind of secret afaik, everyone has different tuning.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48777620&quot; title=&quot;As I understand it going faster typically skips steps that are necessary for maintenance of the panel. Fine for a while but if you don&amp;#39;t periodically run a &amp;#39;proper&amp;#39; cycle the panel could eventually be permanently damaged.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users question the utility of a bistable display that cannot indicate a loss of power &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48776254&quot; title=&quot;Is it even useful as a faceplate? An active display would be way more accurate at displaying hardware stats when the machine loses power (it&amp;#39;ll shut down).&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48776573&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s an interesting case of a display being off actually indicating something (&amp;#39;loss of power&amp;#39;) which can&amp;#39;t be replicated with a bistable screen. On the other hand, you probably don&amp;#39;t want that  glow of an active screen all the time. Status LEDs are annoying enough.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others praise Valve’s openness as a rare example of a company empowering the community rather than locking away hardware add-ons &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48777134&quot; title=&quot;I would love to see an analysis of how valve&amp;#39;s openness and goodwill affects their bottom line. Intuitively it should be a net positive for them, but there gotta be upfront costs, otherwise everyone would be doing it too.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775479&quot; title=&quot;I wish more hardware companies treated these kinds of optional add-ons as something the community can run with instead of either productizing them badly or locking them away completely...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Regarding the hardware itself, commenters note that the Steam Machine offers a unique combination of power, size, and integrated features like HDMI-CEC that are difficult to replicate in custom builds for the same price &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775501&quot; title=&quot;Is the Steam Machine a decently priced desktop compared to the &amp;#39;generic&amp;#39; ones?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48776220&quot; title=&quot;You can&amp;#39;t build a machine which is as powerful, small, quiet, and cheap, nor can you take for granted that a machine you build can have a controller that can wake it from sleep, or which has HDMI-CEC (both are possible, but take extra work or hardware). You can rather easily build a machine with multiple of those attributes, but you&amp;#39;ll have to pick ones to sacrifice in the name of the others.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://katamari64.se/posts/2026/odin-wikipedia/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Odin, Wikipedia and engagement farming&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (katamari64.se)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781196&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;253 points · &lt;strong&gt;389 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by stock_toaster&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After Wikipedia deleted the article for the Odin programming language due to lack of reliable sources, its creator and supporters accused the platform of ideological gatekeeping, sparking a debate over whether Wikipedia’s traditional notability standards are a poor fit for modern software development. &lt;a href=&quot;https://katamari64.se/posts/2026/odin-wikipedia/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Odin, Wikipedia and Engagement Farming    URL Source: https://katamari64.se/posts/2026/odin-wikipedia/    Markdown Content:  [programming](https://katamari64.se/posts/?tag=programming)[public-discourse](https://katamari64.se/posts/?tag=public-discourse)[politics](https://katamari64.se/posts/?tag=politics)Written on 27 Apr 2026 9238 words  Imagine one day you wake up, you drink your morning glass of milk, brush your teeth, sit on your computer, stare your own diffuse image on the display, while…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate centers on Wikipedia&amp;#39;s strict notability and sourcing requirements, which critics argue are antiquated relics that favor traditional media over verifiable primary sources like a CEO&amp;#39;s confirmation of their tech stack &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48782546&quot; title=&quot;Wikipedia seems stuck in an antiquated worldview where things like traditionally-published books with second- or third-hand reports of what happened, and which are frequently incomplete or wholly inaccurate, are nonetheless considered more authoritative than primary sources you can find with a ten-second Google search. So much this. Wikipedia&amp;#39;s processes and policies are - in ways - an outdated and archaic relic of a bygone time. OTOH, I don&amp;#39;t have a definitive answer ready &amp;#39;off the cuff&amp;#39; on…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781492&quot; title=&quot;If I&amp;#39;ve got this right: programming these days -- especially niche areas -- meshes poorly with Wikipedia&amp;#39;s guidelines on reliable sources and notability, which were designed mostly with traditional media in mind. e.g. a company saying they use a language is not considered a good source because it&amp;#39;s a primary source? Not sure if I&amp;#39;m getting that part right. The most interesting part to me: Wikipedia has a bunch of languages that were used by like one person, because there is published material…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find the Odin programming language obscure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781463&quot; title=&quot;This article makes Odin sound extremely well-known. I&amp;#39;ve never heard of it before, and I feel like I keep up with programming topics pretty diligently. Admittedly I don&amp;#39;t work at the systems programming layer, but I&amp;#39;ve definitely heard plenty about Rust and c++ topics. Curious if others feel similarly, or maybe I just happened to miss it?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781690&quot; title=&quot;I keep up with PL development, and I am only vaguely aware of Odin (and same for Jai and V). (But this isn’t the point: lots of programmers know about relatively obscure thing, but that does not itself make them notable. Notability is a well-defined property on Wikipedia.)&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend it is well-known within systems programming circles and that Wikipedia’s reliance on secondary sources creates an &amp;#34;asymmetry of effort&amp;#34; that discourages contributors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48782546&quot; title=&quot;Wikipedia seems stuck in an antiquated worldview where things like traditionally-published books with second- or third-hand reports of what happened, and which are frequently incomplete or wholly inaccurate, are nonetheless considered more authoritative than primary sources you can find with a ten-second Google search. So much this. Wikipedia&amp;#39;s processes and policies are - in ways - an outdated and archaic relic of a bygone time. OTOH, I don&amp;#39;t have a definitive answer ready &amp;#39;off the cuff&amp;#39; on…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781671&quot; title=&quot;Odin is extremely well known to every human being who keeps up on programming language development, along with Zig, Nim, D, Jai, V, Crystal, Carbon, and others. &amp;#39;programming topics&amp;#39; isn&amp;#39;t relevant.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48782765&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;It&amp;#39;s amazing that anybody creates Wikpedia articles at all&amp;#39; Yeh. This is why I stopped editing wikipedia very often. They are maniacal about deleting things that I consider noteworthy but others don&amp;#39;t. I still love wikipedia and think its the best website on the internet, but this is probably its biggest flaw.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, defenders of the policy argue that in a low-trust era of AI and &amp;#34;bad actors,&amp;#34; rigid rules are the only defense against a flood of fake companies and self-promotion &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48783042&quot; title=&quot;I have never been a wikipedia contributor (let alone a mod), but their points seem fair. Maybe not fair for the particular case, but fair for the general case. People who ridicule wikipedia policies should at least acknowledge that the modern internet is a very low trust society with millions of bad actors trying to push their agenda at the expense of others. And now with AI bots running amok the headache increases tenfold. What can an open contribution encyclopedia do in this low trust…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48783716&quot; title=&quot;Also, how are we supposed to know that JangaFX is a real company, and its CEO a real person? Creating fake companies and persona is not particularly high effort today, if that&amp;#39;s all it takes for a pet project to be featured on Wikipedia, it&amp;#39;s going to end up full of crap real quick.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48785029&quot; title=&quot;Because plenty of secondary sources have covered it. Wikipedia&amp;#39;s philosophy is that it summarizes reliable secondary sources. You&amp;#39;re asking for Wikipedia to change its fundamental philosophy so that editors go out and gather primary evidence themselves, debate it, and then deduce what&amp;#39;s true by themselves. That would work if Wikipedia were edited by a select group of highly qualified people you can trust, but it&amp;#39;s not. It&amp;#39;s edited by literally anyone who signs up. So the rules are strict: find…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/world/china/alibaba-ban-claude-code-workplace-over-alleged-backdoor-risks-source-says-2026-07-03/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Alibaba to ban Claude Code in workplace over alleged backdoor risks, source says&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (reuters.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48772443&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;335 points · 279 comments · by nsoonhui&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alibaba has banned employees from using Anthropic’s Claude Code tool due to security features that identify China-linked users, escalating a dispute following Anthropic&amp;#39;s accusations that the Chinese tech giant illicitly extracted its AI model capabilities. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/world/china/alibaba-ban-claude-code-workplace-over-alleged-backdoor-risks-source-says-2026-07-03/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Alibaba to ban employees from using Anthropic&amp;#39;s coding tool, source says    URL Source: https://www.reuters.com/world/china/alibaba-ban-claude-code-workplace-over-alleged-backdoor-risks-source-says-2026-07-03/    Published Time: 2026-07-03T06:50:52.98Z    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: China International Fair for Trade in Services, in…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a perceived hypocrisy in the AI industry, where companies that built models by scraping the internet now accuse competitors of IP theft when those models are &amp;#34;distilled&amp;#34; or reverse-engineered &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48773267&quot; title=&quot;1. LOL I&amp;#39;ve just downloaded literally whole internet and copyrighted books and put them through a neural network. Now I have this whole knowledge in my LLM.      2. Hey? Are you using my NN for training your NN? you&amp;#39;re a thief!&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48773768&quot; title=&quot;Remember how Kim Dotcom got destroyed for criminal copyright infringement? One would think the big tech CEOs would face the same fate, that police officers would rappel down helicopters, storm their mansions and bring them out in cuffs. Instead the AI companies reached these absurd settlements with publishers that made a mockery out of all the previous copyright enforcement victims.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48773582&quot; title=&quot;The issue here is not whether Anthropic used Common Crawl, Alibaba also does that. The issue is that by distilling Claude, Alibaba reuses the IP anthropic used to train the model that&amp;#39;s more akin to historical Chinese reverse engineering methods and disrespect of IP&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that AI training constitutes a &amp;#34;novel transformation&amp;#34; of data, others view the massive scale of unauthorized data ingestion as criminal copyright infringement that has gone unpunished &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48773768&quot; title=&quot;Remember how Kim Dotcom got destroyed for criminal copyright infringement? One would think the big tech CEOs would face the same fate, that police officers would rappel down helicopters, storm their mansions and bring them out in cuffs. Instead the AI companies reached these absurd settlements with publishers that made a mockery out of all the previous copyright enforcement victims.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48773350&quot; title=&quot;Anthropic stole the entire internet. Excuse my language, but they can fuck right off.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48774021&quot; title=&quot;Reminds me, did the AI companies redistribute that copyrighted material to others and make their money that way? Did Kim use the copyrighted material to generate something novel from it? copyright law literally says something isn’t infringement if it is a novel transformation. I get the jokes and criticism about AI companies fighting and complaining about competitors distilling, but this is a much weirder comparison.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond IP concerns, the ban reflects growing enterprise anxiety regarding the security risks of remote AI tools, which could serve as backdoors for government surveillance or expose proprietary codebases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48773566&quot; title=&quot;All remote AI are a massive security risk for individuals/companies/governments that may be targeted by the US government. It is likely that the US will get a live feed from each AI provider that they are inspecting in real time to identity things of interest, terrorist attacks or foreign government planning or even foreign companies competitive to key US companies. It will give them access to the though process in those companies as well as much of their text-based IP (source code, docs,…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48773045&quot; title=&quot;Regardless of whether this specific claim is true, enterprises are becoming much more cautious about developer tools that can read large portions of proprietary codebases.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/jamesob/local-llm&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Jamesob&amp;#39;s guide to running SOTA LLMs locally&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775921&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;405 points · 182 comments · by livestyle&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This GitHub repository provides a comprehensive technical guide for building high-performance local LLM systems, ranging from $2,000 dual-GPU setups to a $46,000 workstation featuring four NVIDIA RTX 6000 Pro GPUs, custom PCIe switching, and optimized Docker configurations for state-of-the-art models. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/jamesob/local-llm&quot; title=&quot;GitHub - jamesob/local-llm: Everything I know about running LLMs locally    Everything I know about running LLMs locally. Contribute to jamesob/local-llm development by creating an account on GitHub.    [Skip to content](#start-of-content)    ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [Sign in](/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fjamesob%2Flocal-llm)    Appearance settings    * Platform      + AI CODE CREATION      - [GitHub CopilotWrite better code with AI](https://github.com/features/copilot)      -…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Running state-of-the-art LLMs locally requires massive financial investments, with high-end builds often exceeding $50,000 and still failing to match the performance of closed-source models like Claude Opus &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48776800&quot; title=&quot;I play with local LLMs a lot. I&amp;#39;ve spent more on hardware than I should. I&amp;#39;m friends with a local group of people who have spent a lot more than I have. The warning I would have for everyone is to temper your expectations and read the fine print carefully. The big build in article starts off with a $40K budget and then includes 4 GPUs that are $12K each. For those doing the math, this build is going to cost more like 50-55K. Local setups also often rely on quantization and techniques like REAP…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48778666&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; &amp;#39;~$40k At this price level, you get the next step up in model intelligence. Something pretty close to Claude Opus.&amp;#39; That is equivalent to 16.8 years of Claude Opus 4.8 or Codex GPT 5.5 at $200/mo. I&amp;#39;m a huge fan of running local models, but they&amp;#39;re still wildly expensive, lower quality, and possibly dangerous (if backdoored). I sincerely wish this wasn&amp;#39;t the case.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48777091&quot; title=&quot;All very true.  Right now, running GLM 5.2 at its full BF16 quantization level needs 1.5 TB of VRAM.  You can&amp;#39;t run this locally at a usable speed for less than $250K or so, and frankly I&amp;#39;d be surprised if it could be done for less than $500K. The best NV4FP quant for 5.2 appears to be lukealonso&amp;#39;s at https://huggingface.co/lukealonso/GLM-5.2-NVFP4 , and it is capable of good throughput (75-100 tps) without losing much reasoning performance.  Allowing for overhead for the KV cache and other…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that aggressive quantization and pruning (REAP) techniques used to fit these models onto consumer or prosumer hardware significantly degrade quality, particularly in long-horizon tasks like coding &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48776800&quot; title=&quot;I play with local LLMs a lot. I&amp;#39;ve spent more on hardware than I should. I&amp;#39;m friends with a local group of people who have spent a lot more than I have. The warning I would have for everyone is to temper your expectations and read the fine print carefully. The big build in article starts off with a $40K budget and then includes 4 GPUs that are $12K each. For those doing the math, this build is going to cost more like 50-55K. Local setups also often rely on quantization and techniques like REAP…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48776755&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;$40k gets you almost-Opus GLM 5.2 is &amp;#39;almost Opus,&amp;#39; and it needs at least 8xH200s for comfortable inference (so it&amp;#39;s closer to $400k than $40k). They suggest using this modified model: &amp;gt;A REAP-pruned (≈22% of experts removed), Int8-mix NVFP4 quantized version of GLM-5.2, ≈594B parameters. I wonder how it behaves in practice outside of benchmarks. Qwen3.6, even at 6-bit quantization, often gets stuck in loops while reasoning. And here they&amp;#39;ve also removed some experts. I mean, sometimes an…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users prefer local setups for data privacy and memory bandwidth advantages over MacBooks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48776644&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;A great way to go is 2x RTX 3090s for a total of 48GB VRAM total. You can then run Qwen3.6-27B, which is an awesome model.&amp;#39; Just want to note that for $3k you can get an M5 macbook pro with 48gb of shared memory, and it will not be a giant box. Also, consider committing to spending that money on a cloud hosting provider, which will be at least somewhat cheaper if not significantly cheaper.  It is awesome being able to run models locally though.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48779012&quot; title=&quot;The cool thing about the 3090s is the RAM bandwidth. Token generation is mostly bottlenecked on memory bandwidth.  Dual 3090s have 1.87 TB/s memory bandwidth (0.936 TB/s each), vs the M5 Macbook pro with only 0.3 TB/s (max chip has up to 0.63 TB/s but it&amp;#39;s a $10k machine at that config). This translates to qwen 27b actually working fast enough for useful work on dual 3090s and being painfully slow on Macbook Pros.  Also if you&amp;#39;re running a big model on a macbook pro the UI gets laggy and the…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that renting cloud GPUs is more cost-effective given the rapid depreciation of hardware and the &amp;#34;lobotomized&amp;#34; nature of local model variants &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48778704&quot; title=&quot;Stop trying to run them locally, folks. You don&amp;#39;t own your fiber connection. So why try to own another rapidly depreciating, expensive, and annoying asset? Rent cloud GPUs! You get to participate in the ownership, data control, price control, and hacking culture without having to Frankenstein some hobbyist box that costs a ton, is distilled down to functional uselessness, and is a PITA to maintain.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48777142&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It&amp;#39;ll almost certainly be worth it, given the abusive behavior we&amp;#39;ve seen and will continue to see from the major closed-model providers. The proper financial comparison for GLM-5.2 would be one of the providers on OpenRouter or renting a server as needed. Compare apples to apples. You will almost certainly never break even compared to paying per token. Local LLMs at this scale are only worth it if you have extremely strict requirements that data not leave the premises.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://citizenlab.ca/research/member-of-committee-investigating-spyware-hacked-with-pegasus/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Espionage Against the European Parliament&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (citizenlab.ca)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48779683&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;424 points · 128 comments · by ledoge&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Former Member of the European Parliament Stelios Kouloglou was repeatedly hacked with Pegasus spyware while serving on a committee investigating spyware abuses, potentially compromising confidential EU proceedings and sensitive medical data. &lt;a href=&quot;https://citizenlab.ca/research/member-of-committee-investigating-spyware-hacked-with-pegasus/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Espionage Against the European Parliament: Member of Committee Investigating Spyware Hacked with Pegasus - The Citizen Lab    URL Source: https://citizenlab.ca/research/member-of-committee-investigating-spyware-hacked-with-pegasus/    Markdown Content:  ## **Key Findings**    *   Former Member of the European Parliament, **Stelios Kouloglou**, was repeatedly hacked with NSO Group’s Pegasus spyware while on the committee investigating Pegasus spyware abuses.  *   Kouloglou was infected during key…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Forensic analysis confirmed that a member of the European Parliament was repeatedly infected with Pegasus spyware, despite Apple sending multiple threat notifications that the victim claims to have missed or ignored &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48780168&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; In May 2026, Kouloglou contacted the Citizen Lab and we conducted a forensic analysis of artifacts from his iPhone. We found with high confidence that his device was successfully infected with Pegasus spyware on or around October 21, 2022, and again on March 6 and 7, 2023.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48780221&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Further validating our finding of targeting, our forensic analysis shows Kouloglou received multiple Apple threat notifications about targeting with mercenary spyware on three occasions: March 2, 2023, August 29, 2023, and April 10, 2024. It is important to note that threat notifications from Apple and other companies are not real-time alerts. They are typically sent to users in batches, often months or more after targeting takes place. &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Kouloglou reports to us that he did not recall…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48780248&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;he did not recall receiving the Apple notifications&amp;#39; so he didn&amp;#39;t notice them.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters view such espionage as an inevitable geopolitical reality, others debate the extent of international &amp;#34;no-spy&amp;#34; agreements and the potential for domestic forensic tools to detect such intrusions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48780276&quot; title=&quot;That seems to be the case, although he claims to have somehow missed them. Overall this is one of those stories that&amp;#39;s obviously an outrage, except for the fact that every country on Earth spies on the rest, and quite a few private entities do as well. Still the way the game is played if you get caught you have to act ashamed, and the people catching you get to gloat. It&amp;#39;s silly, but it&amp;#39;s a show the public never tires of.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48780545&quot; title=&quot;The US does not spy on Five Eyes government leadership or that of Israel. And perhaps more: in the wake of Snowden, which obliterated many diplomatic relationships the U.S. has with other countries, Obama issued a directive that the U.S. would not monitor heads of state and government of close friends and allies (even outside Five Eyes) unless there was a compelling national security reason. As far as we know that directive has remained in force with each successive administration as well. They…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48780798&quot; title=&quot;I wonder if we can forensically analyze our own phones to see if some nutjob with Pegasus has targeted us as well.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48780775&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The US does not spy on Five Eyes government leadership or that of Israel. Doubt. &amp;gt; unless there was a compelling national security reason There always is.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights concerns regarding the European Union&amp;#39;s dependency on U.S. technology and the influence of lobbyists on data privacy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48780156&quot; title=&quot;Not quite surprising. The more important question is: how much are lobbyists paid to sell out data of EU citizens to US corporations here? Will they prevail? There is enough money to go around for certain.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48780548&quot; title=&quot;It feels like they&amp;#39;ve been paid to sell out the users themselves, not just the data. It&amp;#39;s weird that EU is so dependant on US tech when it comes to media platforms... While there are alternatives out there. In a lot of related areas in tech, it feels like suppression.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=9902&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;An American Privacy Emergency&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (scottaaronson.blog)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48768992&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;413 points · 137 comments · by flowercalled&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The U.S. Census Bureau has been banned from using noise infusion, a differential privacy technique, in its published statistical products. &lt;a href=&quot;https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=9902&quot; title=&quot;Recent and related:&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Noise infusion banned from statistical products published by Census Bureau&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=48517377&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=48517377&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt; - June 2026 (604 comments)&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on a recent U.S. Department of Commerce directive (DAO 216-26) that bans differential privacy and &amp;#34;noise infusion&amp;#34; in federal data releases, a move critics argue could lead to the unmasking of sensitive respondent data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48770249&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; On June 4, 2026, the U.S. Secretary of Commerce issued a directive (DAO 216-26) &amp;gt; DAO-216-26 bans differential privacy and other modern (and not so modern) techniques. It restricts disclosure avoidance techniques to “coarsening,” &amp;gt; DAO-216-26 forbids “noise infusion”, described as “methods that involve modifying a dataset by adding random values, or noise.” &amp;gt; By forbidding noise infusion, the directive bans the disclosure avoidance techniques at the core of dozens of data releases over the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48773001&quot; title=&quot;I have a very low opinion of the current US administration, which might be a blindspot when they do something both horrible and not caveman-like in its sophistication. I’m genuinely surprised they would look into differential privacy (again: this sounds judgmental, but I’m just trying to confess my prejudice). I’m more surprised that they were able to look into it and come to the conclusion that they should get rid of it… What could be the logic here?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users debate the technical implementation of differential privacy for legal compliance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48769294&quot; title=&quot;Related: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48517377 It&amp;#39;s too bad this has become political. I do differential privacy work for GDPR compliance and it&amp;#39;s an interesting technology.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48769322&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I do differential privacy work for GDPR compliance and it&amp;#39;s an interesting technology. You mean legislation?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48769622&quot; title=&quot;No? We do GDPR-compliant reporting by using differential privacy to provably remove PII.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others view the policy as a symptom of a &amp;#34;captured&amp;#34; political system where corporate interests and campaign spending outweigh public opinion &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48769626&quot; title=&quot;One of my favorite recently learned facts about Congress: Federally mandated parental leave (paternity and maternity leave) polls at about 80% in favor with the US adult population. This is regardless of political affiliation, by the way. Democrat and Republican voters both support it. Upon reading this, you might be surprised as to why it&amp;#39;s NOT federally mandated given how popular it is. One group it&amp;#39;s NOT popular with is corporations. And corporations donate a lot of money to politicians. And…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48769685&quot; title=&quot;One of the things I have found so alarming about a lot of recent revelations is just how cheap congress goes for.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48769364&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, calling your legislators is going to do precisely nothing [1], just like data centers are almost universally opposed by the communities and the negative externalities are way more real and direct. Yet they keep getting approved anyway. The true crisis here is in the captured political system. In the 1990s in Australia a racist, white supremacist party arose called One Nation through a very weird confluence of events that led a racist fish and chip shop owner by the name of Pauline Hanson…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. This systemic frustration is highlighted by anecdotes regarding the high cost of primary challenges and the disconnect between popular support for social mandates and actual legislative outcomes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48769626&quot; title=&quot;One of my favorite recently learned facts about Congress: Federally mandated parental leave (paternity and maternity leave) polls at about 80% in favor with the US adult population. This is regardless of political affiliation, by the way. Democrat and Republican voters both support it. Upon reading this, you might be surprised as to why it&amp;#39;s NOT federally mandated given how popular it is. One group it&amp;#39;s NOT popular with is corporations. And corporations donate a lot of money to politicians. And…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48769768&quot; title=&quot;Free housing, free food, free health care, and free income are also wildly popular with the US adult population.  The problem is that those things are not really &amp;#39;free&amp;#39; because somebody else needs to pay for them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyranny_of_the_majority&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48769364&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, calling your legislators is going to do precisely nothing [1], just like data centers are almost universally opposed by the communities and the negative externalities are way more real and direct. Yet they keep getting approved anyway. The true crisis here is in the captured political system. In the 1990s in Australia a racist, white supremacist party arose called One Nation through a very weird confluence of events that led a racist fish and chip shop owner by the name of Pauline Hanson…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.wafer.ai/blog/glm52-amd&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Performance per dollar is getting faster and cheaper&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (wafer.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48780417&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;355 points · 135 comments · by latchkey&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wafer reports that AMD’s MI355X GPU achieves superior performance-per-dollar for AI inference compared to NVIDIA’s Blackwell, reaching 80% of the B200&amp;#39;s throughput at less than half the cost by utilizing optimized quantization and framework fixes to overcome traditional software friction. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.wafer.ai/blog/glm52-amd&quot; title=&quot;Title: Performance per dollar is getting faster and cheaper | Wafer    URL Source: https://www.wafer.ai/blog/glm52-amd    Published Time: Fri, 03 Jul 2026 23:46:47 GMT    Markdown Content:  Have you noticed we like AMD?    The demand for inference is skyrocketing and outpacing supply. With frontier models being released almost every other week — Claude Fable, GLM5.2, and Minimax M3, to name a few — the token craze is only getting crazier, and there aren’t enough Blackwells going around to support it.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights NVIDIA&amp;#39;s rapid hardware evolution, with the upcoming Rubin architecture projected to reach 22TB/s memory bandwidth to overcome the bottlenecks inherent in inference &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781784&quot; title=&quot;how do you get 5x faster at inference when inference is memory bandwidth limited?  getting 5x the memory bandwidth of a h100 seems physically difficult.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781974&quot; title=&quot;Rubin has 22TB/s of memory bandwidth vs Blackwell&amp;#39;s 8TB/s. NVLink 6 doubles interconnect speed. Plus they&amp;#39;re moving to 3nm from ~4nm. (Previously this comment said Rubin did native NVFP4, but Blackwell does too! Rubin just also trains with native NVFP4, which Blackwell does not.)&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users emphasize the need for performance-per-watt metrics to evaluate AMD’s viability in energy-expensive international markets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781140&quot; title=&quot;Can you folks add performance per watt as a metric to these comparisons, I honestly want to understand where AMD fits in the stack in terms of actual performance to dollars. I have had talks with companies wanting to build data centers outside of US and find it hard to source anything Nvidia in sufficient capacity and scale. If AMD is competitive performance per watt and roughly reliable in terms of software support which is what most folks outside of US prioritize above all else, since outside…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that high-throughput benchmarks often rely on &amp;#34;benchmark hacking&amp;#34; or FP4 quantization that can &amp;#34;lobotomize&amp;#34; model quality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48782464&quot; title=&quot;This is very interesting and yet not at the same time. This looks to be optimized for single-stream LLM traffic which is not viable to serve in a production setting. It&amp;#39;s only interesting to hobbyists that want to run the model locally. It&amp;#39;s genuinely neat that AI can find the right optimization pathways in an AMD inference server to unlock this but at the same token (pun-intended) this is a classic case of benchmark hacking that doesn&amp;#39;t stand up to real-world application.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48782497&quot; title=&quot;While cool, quantization to FP4 is practically never lossless in actual use. A lot of providers are advertising high TPS on Kimi and GLM, but the models are functionally lobotomized and no longer close to frontier quality. Would love to see this not be true.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also skepticism regarding reported speeds, noting that high token-per-second figures are often aggregate totals rather than single-stream performance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48782464&quot; title=&quot;This is very interesting and yet not at the same time. This looks to be optimized for single-stream LLM traffic which is not viable to serve in a production setting. It&amp;#39;s only interesting to hobbyists that want to run the model locally. It&amp;#39;s genuinely neat that AI can find the right optimization pathways in an AMD inference server to unlock this but at the same token (pun-intended) this is a classic case of benchmark hacking that doesn&amp;#39;t stand up to real-world application.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781377&quot; title=&quot;The 2600 tok/s is an &amp;#39;aggregate&amp;#39;, not the actual throughput.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://eshumarneedi.com/2026/07/03/zuckerberg-admits-metas-layoffs-were.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Zuckerberg &amp;#39;Admits&amp;#39; Meta&amp;#39;s Layoffs Were Ineffective&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (eshumarneedi.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48774454&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;247 points · 229 comments · by ExMachina73&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mark Zuckerberg admitted during a town hall that Meta’s recent restructuring and mass layoffs failed to accelerate the development of AI agents as expected, acknowledging that the company&amp;#39;s aggressive bets on replacing human programmers with automated systems have not yet come to fruition. &lt;a href=&quot;https://eshumarneedi.com/2026/07/03/zuckerberg-admits-metas-layoffs-were.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Zuckerberg ‘Admits’ Meta’s Layoffs Were Ineffective    URL Source: https://eshumarneedi.com/2026/07/03/zuckerberg-admits-metas-layoffs-were.html    Published Time: Fri, 03 Jul 2026 05:22:40 GMT    Markdown Content:  Mark Zuckerberg, Meta’s chief executive, at a Meta town hall [reported](https://www.reuters.com/business/zuckerberg-says-ai-agent-development-going-slower-than-expected-2026-07-02/) by Katie Paul and Courtney Rozen at _Reuters_:    &amp;gt; In retrospect, he said, the “trajectory of the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on Mark Zuckerberg’s perceived management failures, with commenters arguing that his inability to plan beyond short-term windows led to ineffective layoffs and a premature pivot to AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775047&quot; title=&quot;The title is a weird. Ineffective? At doing what? This is an interesting quote from Zuckerberg: &amp;gt; trajectory of the agentic development over at least the last four months hasn’t really accelerated in the way that we expected Combine that with the other theories about Meta management in the article, I think we have the answer to is Zuckerberg a &amp;#39;dimwitted or just evil&amp;#39;. It&amp;#39;s probably the former. He can&amp;#39;t plan four month in advance apparently, nor does he want to wait and work of actual data.…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775025&quot; title=&quot;Seems like a lot of CEOs overestimated the speed of AI, but also it is inevitable.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics suggest that while Zuckerberg’s early success fostered an &amp;#34;irrational belief&amp;#34; in his own heuristics, his track record consists largely of acquisitions rather than internal innovation, leading to costly mistakes like the Metaverse &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48774821&quot; title=&quot;Other than the original few years of Facebook has Zuck actually succeeded at anything new? Metaverse was a failure. Instagram and WhatsApp were both bought and Instagram&amp;#39;s biggest feature is a straight rip from Snapchat. Occulus was bought. Facebook itself is completely dead among all my peers and even the local business stuff I used to do on it is dead now too. It feels like he just falls from one mistake into another but gets away with it due to the company being a behemoth + his unique…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775170&quot; title=&quot;Zuckerberg was barely adult when he started Facebook. And he probably bumped into a few older guys who thought they knew better than him, and history proved them wrong. He likely developed some irrational belief that clever and young beats anything else, and saw an echo of his own bravado in Alexandr Wang. Turns out his heuristics were not calibrated properly.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775301&quot; title=&quot;Didn’t he famously trash folks over 30 years back? He has really done nothing innovative outside of ads.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, there is a consensus that these management shifts have demoralized high-performing engineers, replacing intrinsic motivation with &amp;#34;metric optimization&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;checking out&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775155&quot; title=&quot;I wonder when (if ever) the companies realize that demoralizing your workforce (and destroying that sector of the job market) doesn&amp;#39;t have only advantages. I know plenty of people that reacted with the desired fear, putting in long hours to avoid layoffs, willingness to accept lower pay because the job market sucks, etc. - but I think there are also plenty of the the mythical 10x engineers that just checked out, stopped being 10x engineers, and are just collecting their paychecks and waiting…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view the rapid adoption of AI as inevitable, others argue this narrative is used to bypass critical thinking regarding the actual utility of the technology &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775025&quot; title=&quot;Seems like a lot of CEOs overestimated the speed of AI, but also it is inevitable.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775109&quot; title=&quot;Is AGI really inevitable ? Claiming something is inevitable is a great way to disarm critical thinking.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mistral.ai/news/leanstral-1-5/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Leanstral 1.5: Proof abundance for all&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mistral.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48780801&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;371 points · 103 comments · by programLyrique&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mistral AI has released Leanstral 1.5, a free Apache-2.0 licensed model designed for formal mathematical reasoning and code verification. The model achieved state-of-the-art results on advanced benchmarks like FATE-H and PutnamBench, while successfully identifying previously unknown bugs in open-source Rust repositories. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mistral.ai/news/leanstral-1-5/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Leanstral 1.5: Proof Abundance for All    URL Source: https://mistral.ai/news/leanstral-1-5/    Markdown Content:  Thinking    Summary    Since its launch, Leanstral has offered an open, practical approach to proof engineering in [Lean 4](https://leanprover.github.io/). Today, we are releasing **Leanstral 1.5**, a free Apache-2.0 licensed model with 119B total and only 6B active parameters, delivering a performance upgrade that makes formal verification more powerful and accessible than…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mistral’s strategy of releasing small, high-quality models for specific tasks is praised by users for making capabilities like OCR and file analysis extremely affordable and accessible &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48783157&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s a lot of criticism of Mistral being unable to compete with large model, and that&amp;#39;s fair. But I think it dismisses what Mistral is actually doing, which is making specific capabilities available at high quality in tiny models. I do a lot of OCR, file analysis, stuff like that. I use Mistral for that. I put 100$ into my account, and it just runs for a year without any worries about the amount of requests I make, because the cost is minuscule. That&amp;#39;s valuable, even if it doesn&amp;#39;t compete…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue this low-cost approach creates a &amp;#34;revenue ceiling&amp;#34; and lacks customer lock-in, potentially hindering Mistral&amp;#39;s ability to compete long-term with well-funded American labs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48783969&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not sure the &amp;#39;a year of document processing for under 100 USD/y&amp;#39; is such as great thing as you think it is (at least not for European competitiveness)... It means Mistral is essentially setting a revenue ceiling very low. OCR is a commodity at this point, and open source models, AWS, etc already do it out of the box. Plus, you can&amp;#39;t really build loyalty on a 100 USD/Y price tag. Since there are no switching costs holding them back, those buyers will leave the moment somebody offers a lower…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48784052&quot; title=&quot;well all commodities are like this. replace AI with milk, or plastic. It&amp;#39;s easy for me to just move to different milk provider, this does not mean that milk industry is not a business. And yes, its good that &amp;#39;its good for buyer&amp;#39; after all we do business so that living would be nicer, not the other way around (live to do business)&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. This has sparked broader debate regarding Europe&amp;#39;s competitiveness in AI, with some fearing a permanent &amp;#34;brain drain&amp;#34; to the U.S. due to better compensation and incentives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48782109&quot; title=&quot;I applaud mistral&amp;#39;s efforts but reading this release made me realize that Europe is far far behind and that once the gap is solidified I don&amp;#39;t think its recoverable in the same way Canada&amp;#39;s brain drain had on its economy The best and the brightest from Europe have no incentive to build in Europe when they can do it in America and be compensated and treated far better&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While the technical achievement of Leanstral 1.5 is noted, some question the complexity of the bugs it identifies, suggesting that boundary condition errors should ideally be caught by standard testing or fuzzing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781193&quot; title=&quot;This is nice work, but I found the bug finding example to be weird: &amp;gt; One such bug was in the sign function for zigzag decoding of the datrs/varinteger library. On input Std.U64.MAX, the expression (value + 1) overflowed, causing crashes in debug mode and silent corruption in release mode—an edge case that testing and fuzzing would typically miss. In what way would this boundary condition case be considered something that &amp;#39;testing [...] would typically miss&amp;#39;? It&amp;#39;s certainly something that bad…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.elenaverna.com/p/please-stop-the-ai-confidence-theater&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Please stop the AI confidence theater&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (elenaverna.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48774414&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;228 points · &lt;strong&gt;242 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by skadamat&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Elena Verna argues that exaggerated &amp;#34;AI confidence theater&amp;#34; creates toxic expectations and demoralizes users, urging creators and leaders to prioritize honest, outcome-based results over viral hype and superficial prototypes. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.elenaverna.com/p/please-stop-the-ai-confidence-theater&quot; title=&quot;Title: Please stop the AI Confidence Theater    URL Source: https://www.elenaverna.com/p/please-stop-the-ai-confidence-theater    Published Time: 2026-07-02T18:35:56+00:00    Markdown Content:  AI headlines never disappoint. First, AI was killing education (oh the good ol’ days, I miss thee). Then we moved on to eliminating writers, engineers, designers, product managers, and sales jobs - I believe in that exact order. Marketing, Finance, and HR were spared though, which I find ironic. Google, with…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide between those who view AI as a &amp;#34;force multiplier&amp;#34; for productivity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775810&quot; title=&quot;My observation is that a lot of folks still discounting the capabilities or impact of AI either aren&amp;#39;t working with frontier intelligence or aren&amp;#39;t using it right. While the coding horse has been beat within an inch of its life already, I&amp;#39;d recommend throwing Codex on 5.5 high thinking with Computer Use + auto approve at the next thing you&amp;#39;re about to spend 5+ minutes on to start to get a feel for how well it handles a broad range of work across literally any surface you interact with today.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775783&quot; title=&quot;AI is clearly a force multiplier, both negative and positive. The truth is there are prolific developers like Antirez who have built quality new projects at an incredible pace (Dwarfstar 4, Redis features). But as unpopular as it is to say it, in the working world ~80% of developers pre-AI mostly just attended meetings, did a little busywork and committed small patches here and there. Probably around 20% really moved the needle and contributed the bulk of net new code. Those 80% were…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt; and those who see it as a source of &amp;#34;AI psychosis,&amp;#34; where workers feel pressured to brag about flawed outputs to avoid being fired &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775063&quot; title=&quot;The article has solid observations, but I would correct one important thing. It&amp;#39;s not AI confidence, it&amp;#39;s AI psychosis. A lot of people I know are forced to use AI at work. They universally tell me that  their coworkers generate awful PRs with bugs, nonsensical code and fake unit tests. But they also universally tell me that they are different, have special workflows and prompts that create good code. The psychology behind this is obvious. Hype and the literal threat of being fired forces…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. A strong consensus emerges that marketers and &amp;#34;grifters&amp;#34; have &amp;#34;scorched earth&amp;#34; the technology, flooding niches with low-quality content and technical debt just as they previously ruined self-publishing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48774909&quot; title=&quot;As someone who has worked closely to the marketing space, there’s a saying that goes something like: ‘then the marketers found about it and ruin everything’. Quick example: when amazon launched kindle self publishing, there was a golden age where wannabe writers could self-publish their books, and let the market dictate what survived and became successful. Eventually, some people got good money out of it. Then marketers found out about it. They realized they could game the system by hiring…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775104&quot; title=&quot;I’ve long considered marketing to be one of the purest forms of evil in existence. It truly does envelop and destroy everything good.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48774798&quot; title=&quot;The bullshit will continue until the grifters move on to something else. If you can figure out what that is, you&amp;#39;ll make some serious bank!&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that high-quality results are possible through rigorous technical oversight &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775783&quot; title=&quot;AI is clearly a force multiplier, both negative and positive. The truth is there are prolific developers like Antirez who have built quality new projects at an incredible pace (Dwarfstar 4, Redis features). But as unpopular as it is to say it, in the working world ~80% of developers pre-AI mostly just attended meetings, did a little busywork and committed small patches here and there. Probably around 20% really moved the needle and contributed the bulk of net new code. Those 80% were…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that LLMs have only &amp;#34;solved&amp;#34; a narrow range of software tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775974&quot; title=&quot;Or they aren’t building a SaaS with React or a TUI with Typecript, which is about the only thing that LLMs have “solved”.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt; and that the current hype cycle is driven by a fundamental need to appear adaptable in a deranged corporate environment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775063&quot; title=&quot;The article has solid observations, but I would correct one important thing. It&amp;#39;s not AI confidence, it&amp;#39;s AI psychosis. A lot of people I know are forced to use AI at work. They universally tell me that  their coworkers generate awful PRs with bugs, nonsensical code and fake unit tests. But they also universally tell me that they are different, have special workflows and prompts that create good code. The psychology behind this is obvious. Hype and the literal threat of being fired forces…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775636&quot; title=&quot;I wonder how most of them sleep at night. Do they think they&amp;#39;re providing a valuable service? Do they like what they&amp;#39;re doing? Do they think of themselves as good people?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://wordgard.net/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Wordgard: In-browser rich-text editor from the creator of ProseMirror&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (wordgard.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48772573&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;333 points · 105 comments · by indy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wordgard is an open-source JavaScript library and schema-based rich-text editor designed for building highly customized, accessible, and collaborative in-browser content editors. &lt;a href=&quot;https://wordgard.net/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Wordgard    URL Source: https://wordgard.net/    Published Time: Fri, 03 Jul 2026 14:41:15 GMT    Markdown Content:  # ![Image 1: Wordgard](https://wordgard.net/img/title.jpg)    [Docs](https://wordgard.net/docs/)[Examples](https://wordgard.net/examples/)[Try](https://wordgard.net/try/)[Discuss](https://discuss.wordgard.net/)[Code](https://code.haverbeke.berlin/wordgard/)    **Wordgard**[wɜrd-gɑrd] noun A garden for cultivating words. Open-source JavaScript library implementing an in-browser…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wordgard is a new rich-text editor created to implement design insights that address long-standing issues in ProseMirror, though the creator notes it may not be worth the switching cost for those already satisfied with the older library &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48773611&quot; title=&quot;I think most people would love to the know the &amp;#39;why&amp;#39;. This page discusses differences with prosemirror and is the closest I got to that question: ( https://wordgard.net/docs/prosemirror/ ). One thing to note is that there is not an upgrade path. Many concepts are shared with prosemirror, but it seems that switching means doing quite some work (correct me if I am wrong). Obsidian is based on Code Mirror so I guess they won&amp;#39;t be switching, but tiptap.dev and others do. @merijn, maybe you could…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48774935&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; why wordgard is worth the switching cost? It may not be. If you&amp;#39;re happy with ProseMirror, continue to use ProseMirror. I have your back. But as the blog posts describes, I had a whole pile of new design insights that avoid some of the issues I&amp;#39;ve ran into with ProseMirror, so I had the itch to build a new iteration. I&amp;#39;ll add a link to the blog post to the docs section of the website. (It&amp;#39;s marijn, not merijn.)&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users express concern about the future of ProseMirror given its widespread use in products like ChatGPT and Gemini, others highlight the technical difficulty of building these tools on top of the inconsistent `contenteditable` standard &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48773887&quot; title=&quot;There is contenteditable, which is what all these (Wordgard, ProseMirror) are fundamentally built on. The rest is just the UI, and interop with systems that don&amp;#39;t desire arbitrary HTML as input.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48774199&quot; title=&quot;This is amusing as well as slightly scary. Prosemirror over the years has become the backbone of editors on the web. ChatGPT uses it. Gemini uses it. Linked chat and feed composers are Prosemirror powered. Literally every serious product uses Prosemirror for composing text on the web. There is an entire YC company built on top of Prosemirror (Tiptap). The thought that Prosemirror is no more in active development is scary.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775267&quot; title=&quot;While these use contenteditable, it&amp;#39;s not accurate to say they&amp;#39;re just contenteditable plus some UI and interop. None of these modern editors (Wordgard, ProseMirror, Lexical, Slate) use contenteditable for the document model. Rather, they have their own internal document model and use contenteditable as a kind of input layer where the editor monitors what the browser does, then translates that into actual edits. Early editors like FCKEditor and TinyMCE were only wrappers around contenteditable.…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also touched on the lack of a native web standard for WYSIWYG editing and the challenges of integrating such libraries into frameworks like React &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48773702&quot; title=&quot;Getting that WYSIWYG editor up and running was a major stumbling block that I overcame to get my school newspaper a PHP-Nuke site ~25 years ago. It is insane that there isn&amp;#39;t a web standard implementation for this passed 15 years ago.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48773406&quot; title=&quot;ProseMirror is an excellent project, but it’s always been a bit awkward using it directly in React. I remember that NYT  had to rewrite the renderer to make it work for their use-case. I wonder how Wordgard compares in this aspect!&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/teamchong/pxpipe&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;60% Fable cost cut by converting code to images and having the model OCR it&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48776464&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;306 points · 99 comments · by dimitropoulos&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pxpipe is a local proxy that reduces AI token costs by up to 70% by converting bulky text context, such as code and logs, into compact images for vision-capable models like Claude. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/teamchong/pxpipe&quot; title=&quot;GitHub - teamchong/pxpipe: cut Fable 5 token usage by rendering text context as images    cut Fable 5 token usage by rendering text context as images - teamchong/pxpipe    [Skip to content](#start-of-content)    ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [Sign in](/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fteamchong%2Fpxpipe)    Appearance settings    * Platform      + AI CODE CREATION      - [GitHub CopilotWrite better code with AI](https://github.com/features/copilot)      - [GitHub Copilot appDirect agents…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 60% cost reduction is widely debated as either a temporary &amp;#34;pricing hack&amp;#34; exploiting Anthropic&amp;#39;s token accounting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48777023&quot; title=&quot;This seems like a pricing hack that burns resources, that when the loophole gets closed the price of OCR will have to rise?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48777557&quot; title=&quot;In Gemini at least, if you look at how they process PDFs, they do an OCR and then feed the text + image to the model, without charging you for the text tokens (I believe). So my guess is that Claude’s backend is doing the same — so this hack is probably more of a loophole in token accounting that might get closed if Claude is doing what Gemini does&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48777896&quot; title=&quot;Step back and think about it another way - ask which scenario is more likely: Some random person discovered a 60% across the board gain in all LLMs, using an extremely simple trick that none of the labs noticed in all these years. That trick being to rasterize 8bit characters into 8x8 pixels in a big image. 60% in a market worth trillions of dollars. or Anthropic&amp;#39;s marketing team arbitrarily prices tokens to drive growth, according to vibes and feelings, and didn&amp;#39;t think they needed to price…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt; or a genuine efficiency gain derived from visual encoding &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48777072&quot; title=&quot;It’s not a loophole, it just happens that encoding information as optical tokens is much more efficient than text.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48777848&quot; title=&quot;You are wrong. Text tokens are high-dimensional vectors, not 8 bits per character. Every token has a deep embedding, e.g. 1024 float values per text token. DeepSeek-OCR proved 10x+ compression from visual embedding of text, which was a groundbreaking result. [1] Very cool to see OP&amp;#39;s project hacking on this principle. It&amp;#39;s still not lossless, as noted in the github, but is a promising research direction. [1] https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-OCR/blob/main/DeepSe...&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that rasterizing text into pixels is computationally wasteful compared to standard tokenization &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48777578&quot; title=&quot;Of course it isn&amp;#39;t A text encoding uses 8bits per character on average, tokenization further compresses that An image font would be 25 bits if 5x5, and most fonts are 12 pixels high Of course it isn&amp;#39;t efficient, this is a pricing inefficiency and a hack to exploit it (even the author describes it as an exploit)&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others point to DeepSeek-OCR&amp;#39;s research suggesting that visual tokens can achieve significantly higher compression than high-dimensional text embeddings &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48778565&quot; title=&quot;This is really fascinating to me. I was reading this article and originally agreed with you, &amp;#39;I mean, under the covers it&amp;#39;s got to be converting to text tokens at some point, so there is no way it&amp;#39;s actually cheaper for Claude itself to execute.&amp;#39; But then there is a comment below talking about how DeepSeek was able to get a huge improvement in compression by using visual tokens, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48777848 . I don&amp;#39;t fully understand all of the underlying technical details so I…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48777848&quot; title=&quot;You are wrong. Text tokens are high-dimensional vectors, not 8 bits per character. Every token has a deep embedding, e.g. 1024 float values per text token. DeepSeek-OCR proved 10x+ compression from visual embedding of text, which was a groundbreaking result. [1] Very cool to see OP&amp;#39;s project hacking on this principle. It&amp;#39;s still not lossless, as noted in the github, but is a promising research direction. [1] https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-OCR/blob/main/DeepSe...&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the cost benefits, users noted that the project&amp;#39;s documentation suffers from &amp;#34;LLM-compressed&amp;#34; prose that is difficult to parse and lacks clarity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48777141&quot; title=&quot;Ahhh my eyes the vibe coded readme&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48778682&quot; title=&quot;It’s so painful to read the LLM-compressed explanations. I can’t exactly identify what it is, but it’s an immediate tell and literally requires twice the effort to comprehend. For example: &amp;gt; Honest caveat, visible in the clip: the pxpipe arm answered the count first and needed one follow-up nudge to also print the ledger balance in the requested one-line format; the plain arm followed the format on the first try. Legibility is solved on Fable — single-reply format compliance is the remaining…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48779018&quot; title=&quot;Here&amp;#39;s one rewrite that would have helped: To be fair, as you can see in the clip, the two models handled the prompt slightly differently. The pxpipe variant gave the right count initially but needed a quick follow-up to output the ledger balance in a single line. The standard model, on the other hand, nailed the formatting on its first try. We&amp;#39;ve completely solved readability here on Fable; our only real hurdle left is getting the models to follow formatting constraints perfectly on the very…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://interconnected.org/home/2026/07/03/factories&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Factories are just rooms&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (interconnected.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48776035&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;279 points · 123 comments · by arbesman&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author describes visiting a primary school to demystify manufacturing for children, using his AI clock project to show that factories are simply rooms where people turn prototypes and sketches into real-world products. &lt;a href=&quot;https://interconnected.org/home/2026/07/03/factories&quot; title=&quot;Title: Factories are just rooms    URL Source: https://interconnected.org/home/2026/07/03/factories    Markdown Content:  I went into my kid’s school a couple months back and spoke to the year group about manufacturing.    Honestly it was the most rewarding speaking gig I’ve done all year.    It was about the process of making my AI clock and I have a ton of pics from [my factory visit to Shenzhen](https://interconnected.org/home/2025/07/18/shenzhen) (mostly pics that I have only shared with Kickstarter…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the idea that manufacturing is often just a collection of rooms and skilled individuals rather than impenetrable &amp;#34;megafactories,&amp;#34; highlighting how Shenzhen’s ecosystem of small garage workshops can rapidly prototype complex machinery like electric engines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48777115&quot; title=&quot;This is from someone that has observed Shenzen. A location where much is made in garage sized factories (usually literally a garage space at ground level where people will bang out products by hand). You might not expect a bespoke 2 ton electric train engine to be made in a series of garages but it really is. One lot of workers will be experts at winding coils. They&amp;#39;ll have a rig that spins and a spool of copper to wind on with a practiced skill so that they do it as well as any multi million…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some emphasize the importance of a &amp;#34;maker&amp;#34; mindset and early education in fostering the belief that anything can be built from first principles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48778795&quot; title=&quot;I find it interesting how far we&amp;#39;ve come so far from the mindset of &amp;#39;You can do that.&amp;#39; There was a hilariously funny reddit post about someone who discovered that you could just blend peanuts and it would make peanut butter. But there was sadness there too. All of my kids spent hours pouring over a book we had called &amp;#39;The Way Things Work&amp;#39; with a delightfully funny Mammoth and a good description of how things actually work. But I&amp;#39;ve always augmented that with &amp;#39;okay and this is how we&amp;#39;d make…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48778912&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; All of my kids spent hours pouring over a book we had called &amp;#39;The Way Things Work&amp;#39; with a delightfully funny Mammoth and a good description of how things actually work I grew up with this book - I have vivid memories still of the pages about a nuclear reactor - and I was pleasantly surprised to visit a bookshop recently and find it still in print, updated with new things like LIDAR, 3D Printers, MoCap, etc.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48778898&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s really interesting how the education system works, you walk into a room of 7-year olds and you&amp;#39;d be amazed at the level of curiosity and interest those kids have for everything around them, you can literally see it in their eyes. Fast forward a few years and all of that is gone, in teenage classrooms. There is no &amp;#39;awe&amp;#39;, it has meticulously been sucked out of them. I really love maker spaces exactly for this reason, it helps keep that spark alive.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that there is a critical distinction between a prototype shop and a true factory, which requires capital investment in specialized machinery to scale effectively &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48778412&quot; title=&quot;I worked for a company whose factory really was just a room - the company was a machine-builder, a B2B manufacturer of custom production equipment, but with very little investment in special-purpose machinery for its facilities or even machine tools, just an attitude that the company is the people and we can do or buy anything that our customers need. In some ways that attitude seemed admirable, but ultimately it didn&amp;#39;t help the company win or keep consistent business. You&amp;#39;d have gaggles of…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48778628&quot; title=&quot;Factories, were like that. Giant Mills, Planing machines, vacuum forming tooling, welding stations, etc. Configurable, yes. Tooling, yes. It&amp;#39;s why ford, singer and a hundred other american factories could start making bombs, guns and anything during WW2. You had machinists who could read a drafting diagram, and drafters who could draft anything up. Today, could we do that? probably not. Not even - we don&amp;#39;t have the basic bootstrapping tools in capacities needed, we don&amp;#39;t have a wide group of…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable anecdotes include the joy of managing small-scale hand-assembly lines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48777424&quot; title=&quot;I setup and ran a small (10 people) factory many years ago in the UK. Hand assembly and a bit of soldering. It was the most enjoyable work I’ve ever done. I built custom jigs, worked with my team to improve the process, managed inventory, line balancing, work in progress, dispatching, deliveries, built palette racking, learned about kanban and buffers, wrote software to manage it, all working with a team of great people. If anyone has the opportunity to work in manufacture or adjacent to it I…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt; and the observation that everyday spaces like fast-food kitchens function as highly efficient, overlooked factories &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48779943&quot; title=&quot;I would argue a fast food kitchen (or any kitchen) is a factory. An incredibly efficient one at that. Things are made and assembled to order from intermediate components. We take it for granted the amount of labor that goes into our food. There&amp;#39;s no reason we could not make other consumer goods in the US at such scale - we just have weird, self-imposed constructs that say assembly line workers get more prestige and protections and food workers don&amp;#39;t. Or that we are willing to pay $8 more for a…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.exeter.ac.uk/faculty-of-environment-science-and-economy/giant-trees-have-no-trouble-pumping-water-to-top-branches/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Giant trees have no trouble pumping water to top branches: new research&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (news.exeter.ac.uk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48780870&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;267 points · 119 comments · by hhs&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;New research on giant Dipterocarp trees reveals that internal adaptations, such as wider water vessels and stress-resistant leaves, allow the world&amp;#39;s tallest tropical trees to transport water and survive droughts just as effectively as shorter trees. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.exeter.ac.uk/faculty-of-environment-science-and-economy/giant-trees-have-no-trouble-pumping-water-to-top-branches/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Giant trees have no trouble pumping water to top branches    URL Source: https://news.exeter.ac.uk/faculty-of-environment-science-and-economy/giant-trees-have-no-trouble-pumping-water-to-top-branches/    Published Time: 2026-07-02T18:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  The world’s tallest tropical trees have no trouble pumping water to their topmost branches, [new research reveals](https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aea9013).    Conventional scientific theory suggests that as trees grow, it becomes…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the physics of water transport in trees, with commenters debating whether &amp;#34;pumping&amp;#34; is an accurate term given that atmospheric pressure limits suction to roughly 10 meters &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781133&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Giant trees have no trouble pumping water to top branches Hm, may be because they are not really &amp;#39;pumping&amp;#39; the water?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781214&quot; title=&quot;Not that it really matters, but the article also refers to it as “drawing water to the top”. That seems more representative of reality than “pumping water from the bottom”.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781383&quot; title=&quot;If you think of it that way, you have a real problem. It only takes about 10 meters for the weight of a column of water to create enough downward force that it starts vaporizing, at which point no pumping action works. This is why any deep well has a submerged pump. You simply can&amp;#39;t pull water upward further than that with negative pressure in the Earth&amp;#39;s atmosphere. It must be pushed with positive pressure instead. This is why the question is interesting. You can&amp;#39;t just suck water to the top…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that positive-pressure mechanisms must be involved to overcome these physical limits, others point out that many giant trees bypass the climb entirely by absorbing moisture from coastal fog &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781383&quot; title=&quot;If you think of it that way, you have a real problem. It only takes about 10 meters for the weight of a column of water to create enough downward force that it starts vaporizing, at which point no pumping action works. This is why any deep well has a submerged pump. You simply can&amp;#39;t pull water upward further than that with negative pressure in the Earth&amp;#39;s atmosphere. It must be pushed with positive pressure instead. This is why the question is interesting. You can&amp;#39;t just suck water to the top…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781397&quot; title=&quot;on the other hand, many giant trees get the water out of the air via fog: Coalescence of coastal fog accounts for a considerable part of the trees&amp;#39; water needs.[23] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequoia_sempervirens#Fog_and_f... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequoia_sempervirens&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Skepticism remains regarding the study&amp;#39;s conclusions, as participants note that trees still appear bound by a theoretical height limit of roughly 130 meters, a boundary that may have been tested by legendary specimens like the Nooksack Giant before they were logged &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781474&quot; title=&quot;The largest tree on record is rejected in part because it&amp;#39;s over the theoretical limit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nooksack_Giant Too bad we cut it down, along with almost every other giant Douglas-fir.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781378&quot; title=&quot;This goes against all previous research/measurements for actually tall trees (looks like they only considered up to 80m) and the fact that there are exactly zeros trees in the world taller than 130 meters [1]. Wide capillaries at the base, like stated in the article, don&amp;#39;t seem to be related. [1] https://www.sfgate.com/science/article/REDWOODS-How-tall-can...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48782063&quot; title=&quot;I agree it doesn&amp;#39;t pass the sniff test (where are the 500 meter trees in the rainforests?) but I think it would make an excellent goal for molecularbiological and genetic engineering. We (our civilization) need to become much more skilled at that before we start editing the human germline, and we will inevitably want to edit the human germline eventually (or rather we are currently exhibiting great restraint in not doing so but I&amp;#39;m not sure how much longer that will last), and anyway thousand…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781716&quot; title=&quot;Human barbarism is not new... &amp;#39;The placard recorded that the Nooksack tree produced 96,345 board feet (227.348 cubic meters) of the &amp;#39;finest quality&amp;#39; lumber. The New York Times regarded the tree in a March 7, 1897 issue as the &amp;#39;most magnificent fir tree ever beheld by human eyes&amp;#39; and called its destruction a &amp;#39;truly pitiable tale&amp;#39; and a &amp;#39;crime&amp;#39;. The Morning Times of February 28, 1897 claimed that the wood, sawed into one-inch strips, would reach from &amp;#39;Whatcom [the tree&amp;#39;s location] to China&amp;#39;.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20415&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Markets are competitive if and only if P != NP&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (arxiv.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48776345&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;220 points · 150 comments · by kscarlet&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A new paper argues that competitive markets require computational intractability (P != NP) to prevent firms from efficiently detecting and maintaining collusion. The author concludes that markets cannot be both informationally efficient and competitive, suggesting that AI-driven computational power is currently pushing markets toward algorithmic collusion. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20415&quot; title=&quot;Title: Markets are competitive if and only if P != NP    URL Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20415    Published Time: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 01:11:32 GMT    Markdown Content:  [Skip to main content](https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20415#content)    ![Image 1](https://arxiv.org/static/base/1.0.1/images/icons/smileybones-small.svg)arXiv is now an independent nonprofit![Learn more](https://info.arxiv.org/about)×    [](https://arxiv.org/IgnoreMe)[![Image 2:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The paper argues that markets can be informationally efficient or competitive, but not both, suggesting that increased computational power naturally pushes firms toward algorithmic collusion &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48776533&quot; title=&quot;Very interesting. The author claims to have proved that markets can be informationally efficient or competitive, but not both. The implications for policy and regulation are significant. The author looks credible: https://philipmaymin.com/about-philip Thank you for sharing this on HN. -- To the mods: The title needs to be edited to replace the equal sign with not-equal.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48776492&quot; title=&quot;The actual paper&amp;#39;s title is &amp;#39;Markets are competitive if and only if P != NP&amp;#39; Seems that HN&amp;#39;s auto-headline rewriting in this case has made a critical error :) &amp;gt;Artificial intelligence, by expanding firms&amp;#39; computational capabilities, is pushing markets from the competitive regime toward the collusive regime, explaining the empirical emergence of algorithmic collusion without explicit coordination. I have to dig more into the paper but I don&amp;#39;t see how this follows, except in the most…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters see this as a significant explanation for modern market behavior, others argue the real world is too messy for such theoretical proofs to apply or that the result is a simple consequence of better information flow rather than &amp;#34;compute&amp;#34; itself &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48776871&quot; title=&quot;The implications are not significant..? the real world is messy enough that this will not ever apply.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48776492&quot; title=&quot;The actual paper&amp;#39;s title is &amp;#39;Markets are competitive if and only if P != NP&amp;#39; Seems that HN&amp;#39;s auto-headline rewriting in this case has made a critical error :) &amp;gt;Artificial intelligence, by expanding firms&amp;#39; computational capabilities, is pushing markets from the competitive regime toward the collusive regime, explaining the empirical emergence of algorithmic collusion without explicit coordination. I have to dig more into the paper but I don&amp;#39;t see how this follows, except in the most…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also touches on the broader validity of economic theory, with some defending supply and demand as foundational business realities while others view them as useful but flawed abstractions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48777380&quot; title=&quot;The fact that free markets don&amp;#39;t exist, and that supply and demand is not a natural law that implies efficient markets has never stopped people acting like both are true and stuffing fingers in their ears. But, both free markets and supply/demand are useful enough concepts to talk loosely about processes to understand the interest that I&amp;#39;ll enjoy digging into this.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48777439&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;re not just useful concepts tho, they&amp;#39;re how every business operates, and the concepts cover the vast majority of situations. The behavioral economics/Freakonomics thing was like &amp;#39;Hey, here&amp;#39;s this thing that might if you squint real hard fall outside of efficient market theory&amp;#39; and then for a decade people took that to mean that that the base concepts were worthless , which was a severe overcorrection from people that didn&amp;#39;t understand economics.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48777855&quot; title=&quot;Economics is one of the scientific sore spots for liberal ideology. If you are liberal and mostly swim in liberal circles, you probably believe that economics is mostly bunk pseudoscience. Akin to conservatives and climate change&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/searxng/searxng&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SearXNG: A free internet metasearch engine&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48779454&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;276 points · 78 comments · by theanonymousone&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SearXNG is a free, privacy-focused metasearch engine that aggregates results from various databases and search services without tracking or profiling its users. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/searxng/searxng&quot; title=&quot;GitHub - searxng/searxng: SearXNG is a free internet metasearch engine which aggregates results from various search services and databases. Users are neither tracked nor profiled.    SearXNG is a free internet metasearch engine which aggregates results from various search services and databases. Users are neither tracked nor profiled. - searxng/searxng    [Skip to content](#start-of-content)    ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [Sign…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While SearXNG remains a highly recommended self-hosted search engine for daily use &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48779984&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been self hosting this as my default engine across all of my searches for a few years now. I can&amp;#39;t recommend it more highly.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, its original creator has pivoted to a new project called Hister, which indexes a user&amp;#39;s browser history and local files to serve as a &amp;#34;long-term memory&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48780841&quot; title=&quot;Ohi, I&amp;#39;m the original creator of Searx, but due to the limitations of the metasearch concept I&amp;#39;m not involved in the development anymore. My new search project is https://github.com/asciimoo/hister ( https://hister.org/ ). Hister is a full text indexer for websites and local files which automatically saves all the visited pages rendered by your browser. Storing full page content allows serving offline result previews and the full page content via MCP. Take a look at how the MCP can be utilized:…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781446&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m sorry for not taking the time to read the docs, but I have a question. Some 20 years ago a friend of mine has set up a local proxy (python if I&amp;#39;m not mistaken) that was gathering all his web traffic and served him as a long term memory. The proxy had a web interface and allowed him to quickly find something he saw ca. 10 days ago, or that specific algorithm he recalls but can&amp;#39;t remember it&amp;#39;s name. For years I&amp;#39;ve been collecting links to different work related trivia which I use on a daily…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781540&quot; title=&quot;Absolutely, this is a great example where Hister can shine. I started Hister as a proxy as well, but quickly switched to the current extension based approach, because intercepting HTTPS traffic requires a MiTM proxy which is much more painful to setup than installing a browser extension.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Users are particularly interested in using these tools to provide private search capabilities and context to local AI models via the Model Context Protocol (MCP) &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48780841&quot; title=&quot;Ohi, I&amp;#39;m the original creator of Searx, but due to the limitations of the metasearch concept I&amp;#39;m not involved in the development anymore. My new search project is https://github.com/asciimoo/hister ( https://hister.org/ ). Hister is a full text indexer for websites and local files which automatically saves all the visited pages rendered by your browser. Storing full page content allows serving offline result previews and the full page content via MCP. Take a look at how the MCP can be utilized:…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48780793&quot; title=&quot;This appears to be a key tool for providing search to local models. I&amp;#39;m curious what setups folks use to provide this functionality. Since the quantized 24B parameter Gemma model came out, I&amp;#39;ve had good luck with tool calling on a 4070 Ti Super. Successful tool calling is what finally made the local experience useful. I should note this is for the general and not coding specific context.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48779957&quot; title=&quot;TinySearch wraps this and works well for agents. It&amp;#39;s better than the native SearXNG MCP because it optimizes the context before it even gets to the agent so as to not waste tokens. https://github.com/MarcellM01/TinySearch&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also touched on the technical challenges of indexing large-scale local data and the trade-offs between using browser extensions versus MiTM proxies for traffic interception &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781540&quot; title=&quot;Absolutely, this is a great example where Hister can shine. I started Hister as a proxy as well, but quickly switched to the current extension based approach, because intercepting HTTPS traffic requires a MiTM proxy which is much more painful to setup than installing a browser extension.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781506&quot; title=&quot;Also very interested in this. I was playing around with doing the same thing with YaCY. I want the proxy aspect so that I can proxy my phone traffic through it as well.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48781425&quot; title=&quot;I love your idea and wondered why saving and indexing browser visited pages was not being done. Does this handle large amounts of local files, for example 10-20TB across file types like Powerpoint, Excel, Word, and PDF?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-07-02</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-07-02</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://f-droid.org/2026/07/01/adv-malware.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Android Developer Verification: Threat masquerading as protection&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (f-droid.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48755965&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1720 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 738 comments · by drewfax&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;F-Droid warns that Google’s new &amp;#34;Android Developer Verification&amp;#34; program acts as a &amp;#34;trojan horse&amp;#34; that allows Google to unilaterally block unapproved software by requiring all developers to register centrally, potentially ending the tradition of open software distribution on Android devices. &lt;a href=&quot;https://f-droid.org/2026/07/01/adv-malware.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: What We Talk About When We Talk About Malware | F-Droid - Free and Open Source Android App Repository    URL Source: https://f-droid.org/2026/07/01/adv-malware.html    Published Time: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 15:25:31 GMT    Markdown Content:  If you are running Android 8 or higher, a virus has been installed on your device and is silently awaiting remote activation. Over the past few months, devices around the world have been infected with this novel strain, with as many as 4 billion Android handsets…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a growing frustration with Google’s aggressive developer verification and account management policies, which users warn can lead to &amp;#34;collateral damage&amp;#34; where an algorithmic ban nukes a person&amp;#39;s entire digital life and family accounts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48757540&quot; title=&quot;I think the most fun part with Google is that if some wayward algorithm decides it doesn’t like you, along with nuking your app and developer account it will probably nuke your 20 year old gmail, your kids Google Drive accounts, your wife’s YouTube premium, the Adsense account of some company you worked for in 2008, and disable your Nest cameras. And you’ll never reach a human to sort it out.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758681&quot; title=&quot;What happens if you &amp;#39;accidentally&amp;#39; become persona non grata with both Google and Apple? If you want to participate in the society, you will forever have to resort to shady tactics. Shady can be defined something as arbitrary as using GrapheneOS. A temporary workaround like using alternatives like GrapheneOS for those affected  will only delay the inevitable but it doesn&amp;#39;t stop it at all.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While many advocate for a transition to Linux-based mobile operating systems or GrapheneOS to escape this ecosystem, critics point out that these alternatives are often hindered by hardware limitations, the irony of needing to buy Google Pixel phones to run them, and the inability to use &amp;#34;mandatory&amp;#34; banking or government ID apps &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48757453&quot; title=&quot;Android users need to switch to Graphene. Someone needs to create a Linux based mobile OS foundation - Google&amp;#39;s domination is contrary to many large companies interests, and if Meta and many other such companies were approached, they may well donate large sums of money in their own strategic interests.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758259&quot; title=&quot;It doesn&amp;#39;t solve the current issue, but in case we don&amp;#39;t manage to push back on this, some people might not know that there are various actual linux OSes for mobile: - SailfishOS: still linux based and seems fairly community inclusive, but the UI part of the stack is closed source. Is the only one officially allowed to run android apps, via emulation. Has existed for a very long time, it&amp;#39;s lightweight and I think the most stable/bug-free in this list. - Ubuntu Touch: fully open source and…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758723&quot; title=&quot;And all are useless because you can&amp;#39;t use your mandatory bank or gov id app.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758001&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Android users need to switch to Graphene. Doesn&amp;#39;t GrapheneOS supports only Google Pixel smartphones now? For most of the users, that would mean changing their phones beforehand. And if we&amp;#39;re talking about common people (especially not in US), it&amp;#39;s not even everyone who can afford that. Moreover, in my opinion, by buying Google phones you&amp;#39;re feeding Google, and I, personally, would like to avoid that.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong call for a corporate-backed Linux mobile foundation to challenge the current duopoly, though participants remain skeptical about how to effectively resist Google&amp;#39;s shift toward a more restrictive, Apple-like &amp;#34;walled garden&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48757453&quot; title=&quot;Android users need to switch to Graphene. Someone needs to create a Linux based mobile OS foundation - Google&amp;#39;s domination is contrary to many large companies interests, and if Meta and many other such companies were approached, they may well donate large sums of money in their own strategic interests.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48757561&quot; title=&quot;What Google is doing is shameful. One of the promises of Android was being more open than the restrictive Apple ecosystem. Now that they reached penetration they do the switch - under the guise of security. Just let me do with my hardware what I want to do it. Let it be my responsibility to install whatever I want (and stop calling it &amp;#39;side-loading&amp;#39;, as if I am doing something shady from the &amp;#39;side&amp;#39;). We need to resist this! Alas, from the broader response it seems that most people just do not…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758803&quot; title=&quot;Over the long term, we definitely need something like Linux phones. I find it bizzarre by how little companies support this mission of Linux phones.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758152&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; We need to resist this! I agree. What do you suggest? How can we contribute to the resistance?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.hunton.com/privacy-and-cybersecurity-law-blog/virginia-bans-sale-of-geolocation-data&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Virginia bans sale of precise geolocation data&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (hunton.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48767347&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;949 points · 138 comments · by toomuchtodo&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger signed S.B. 388 into law, amending the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act to prohibit the exchange of geolocation data for monetary consideration effective July 1, 2026. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.hunton.com/privacy-and-cybersecurity-law-blog/virginia-bans-sale-of-geolocation-data&quot; title=&quot;Title: Virginia Bans Sale of Geolocation Data    URL Source: https://www.hunton.com/privacy-and-cybersecurity-law-blog/virginia-bans-sale-of-geolocation-data    Markdown Content:  [](https://www.hunton.com/)    [Main Content](https://www.hunton.com/privacy-and-cybersecurity-law-blog/#mainContent)[Main Menu](https://www.hunton.com/privacy-and-cybersecurity-law-blog/#mainNav &amp;#39;Menu&amp;#39;)[](https://www.hunton.com/privacy-and-cybersecurity-law-blog/#siteSearch &amp;#39;Search&amp;#39;)Menu  *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely support the ban, arguing that users typically reject data collection when given an uncoerced choice and that current practices often rely on false pretenses or hidden exchanges for profit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48768433&quot; title=&quot;Given the actual informed and uncoerced choice, people say no to this kind of collection and especially its sale or use for any purpose other than the explicit service they thought they were allowing it for (navigation, setting the time, etc etc). This is true for basically all information collected. I&amp;#39;m glad to see there is some minor protection language being included but it needs to have real teeth and get to the point. If you collect data from me under false pretenses or using coercive…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48767901&quot; title=&quot;Exactly. Exchanging private and personal user data without consent and without users being aware of it, for their profits.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate whether profiting from data is inherently harmful, others point out that the lack of transparency and the use of data for punitive measures—such as car insurance companies tracking driving habits—constitute a clear injury to the consumer &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48767811&quot; title=&quot;NYTimes article a few years ago on how car insurance companies were using such data. Tracking sudden stoos, driving at night, driving faster than 80 mph, etc.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48768207&quot; title=&quot;The economy is not 0 sum. Someone else profiting doesn&amp;#39;t hurt you.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48768255&quot; title=&quot;Seems you missed that part that DOES hurt us: &amp;gt; Exchanging private and personal user data without consent and without users being aware of it&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical and legal questions remain regarding the definition of &amp;#34;precise&amp;#34; data and how the law will handle out-of-state corporations or coercive pricing models that tie product discounts to data surrendering &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48768908&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s the limit of coercion? Can someone provide a product that loudly says &amp;#39;we will sell your geolocation data&amp;#39; on checkout? Is it coercion if you simply want the product?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48767889&quot; title=&quot;So let&amp;#39;s say a Delaware incorporated company sells location data that happens to be collected in Virginia, but its sold from the corporation with no operations in Virginia. What happens?  On the other hand us-east-1 is in Virginia with who knows how many payment processing servers running.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48768979&quot; title=&quot;Yes.  Paying the money the data is worth isn’t coercive, linking some other transaction to selling your location data is. This includes having a discount larger than what your location data is worth.  IE: I’ll sell you this car for 50k, o you want it without location tracking that will be 150k.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48768057&quot; title=&quot;I was intrigued, because even a broad location given for an IP address is &amp;#39;geolocation data&amp;#39;, but the law says &amp;#39;precise geolocation data&amp;#39; which limits it to device-reported data, I assume.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://clashreport.com/world/articles/spain-orders-blacklist-of-us-tech-giant-palantir-from-public-and-private-companies-fsnc2z17gjv&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Spain Orders Blacklist of Palantir from Public and Private Companies&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (clashreport.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48762725&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;740 points · 304 comments · by mgh2&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Spain has blacklisted U.S. data firm Palantir from state-controlled companies due to national security concerns over classified information, though the company maintains an active defense contract until November. &lt;a href=&quot;https://clashreport.com/world/articles/spain-orders-blacklist-of-us-tech-giant-palantir-from-public-and-private-companies-fsnc2z17gjv&quot; title=&quot;Spain Orders Blacklist of US Tech Giant Palantir From Public and Private Companies    The Spanish government has blacklisted U.S. data analytics giant Palantir Technologies from public and private state-controlled companies due to growing concerns over the potential misuse of classified national security information.    [![Skydagger — skydagger.com](https://clashreport-storage.b-cdn.net/ads/skydagger/skydagger-vertical.jpg)](https://www.skydagger.com/en)    [![Skydagger —…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users view Spain&amp;#39;s decision as a positive step toward digital sovereignty &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48765314&quot; title=&quot;Spain is really going in the right direction, I wonder why no one countries inspire from what they are doing&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48764612&quot; title=&quot;I really like what Spain is doing recently. If it weren&amp;#39;t for climate change, I&amp;#39;d consider moving there.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, critics argue the move is hypocritical given the government&amp;#39;s reported use of Chinese infrastructure for sensitive intelligence and judicial data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48765555&quot; title=&quot;I do agree blocking Palantir is a good move but the Spanish government is doing it for the wrong reason. Spain is storing all sort of data on Chinese servers, including their Intelligence, and Judicial wiretaps. https://www.politico.eu/article/spain-huawei-contract-judici...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. The debate over Palantir itself is polarized: some attribute the backlash to the &amp;#34;technofascist&amp;#34; ideology and political manifestos of CEO Alex Karp &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48766800&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I can&amp;#39;t figure out what the specific objection to Palantir is. You have to be trolling, a single online search tells you how the company CEO is the textbook definition of technofascism. Take a look at his manifesto if you don’t know&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48767041&quot; title=&quot;So the objections to Palantir are political? I know nothing about Spanish politics so I assume that makes sense in the Spanish political context. This helps explain why I can&amp;#39;t find a specific concrete concern, it sounds more vibes-based. Thank you!&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend these objections are &amp;#34;vibes-based&amp;#34; and inconsistent with the acceptance of other major defense contractors like Boeing or Microsoft &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48767041&quot; title=&quot;So the objections to Palantir are political? I know nothing about Spanish politics so I assume that makes sense in the Spanish political context. This helps explain why I can&amp;#39;t find a specific concrete concern, it sounds more vibes-based. Thank you!&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48767097&quot; title=&quot;What is this in reference to? Karp has said that US tech companies should be more willing to work with military and intelligence agencies. By that standard, though, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Booz Allen Hamilton, heck even Microsoft are all supporters of &amp;#39;technofascism&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the thread touches on Spain&amp;#39;s broader appeal, noting that while climate change is a concern for potential expats, the country&amp;#39;s immigration policies may help it avoid the demographic stagnation seen in other aging nations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48765462&quot; title=&quot;I think the immigration is what keeps Spain from turning into another Japan or Germany - a stagnant, overly old place stuck in time.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48764827&quot; title=&quot;Canary Islands are part of Spain and probably unaffected from climate change - we have 19-22°C all year round. If it raises to 25° still pretty livable.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/Chocobozzz/PeerTube&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;PeerTube is a free, decentralized and federated video platform&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48759634&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;673 points · 354 comments · by doener&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PeerTube is a free, decentralized, and ad-free video platform that uses ActivityPub and P2P technology to provide a federated, community-owned alternative to centralized services like YouTube. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/Chocobozzz/PeerTube&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - Chocobozzz/PeerTube: ActivityPub-federated video streaming platform using P2P directly in your web browser    URL Source: https://github.com/Chocobozzz/PeerTube    Markdown Content:  ## [![Image 1:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the economic viability of PeerTube, with professional creators arguing that the platform&amp;#39;s lack of monetization makes it impossible to sustain the high labor costs required for quality video production &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48765018&quot; title=&quot;As a professional YouTuber, the main issue I instantly see with this is the lack of monetization. I think people who don&amp;#39;t make videos for a living severely underestimate how expensive it is to produce high-quality videos people want to watch. This isn&amp;#39;t like writing a tweet or even posting a picture on Instagram. Even a decent 20-minute video can easily take 40 man-hours of high-skilled labor. I have a pretty small channel (~100K subscribers) with no employees and relatively low upkeep costs…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48764927&quot; title=&quot;Creators get 60% of youtube&amp;#39;s ad revenue from youtube. What does Peertube pay? There is your answer. If people want good stuff, there needs to be money flowing to the source of it. The internet desperately needs to shed this &amp;#39;everything good is totally free&amp;#39; mindset, because what it actually manifests as is &amp;#39;I love taking without the requirement of giving&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest using PeerTube to mitigate &amp;#34;platform risk&amp;#34; by owning one&amp;#39;s distribution channel &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48765116&quot; title=&quot;You can publish to both and even better your own domain that simply points to your video hosting provider. Long term you want to own your distribution channel as much as possible, while using YouTube as your lead generation tool to drive true believers to your site and premium distribution channel not owned by YouTube. Otherwise, you will always be subject to platform risk via YouTube&amp;#39;s whims which has destroyed many content creators. That&amp;#39;s the long term winning play IMO and it doesn&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that the vast majority of uploaders are not professionals and may not require financial incentives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48765186&quot; title=&quot;There are 100M+ channels uploading on YouTube regularly and only 2-3M of them are monetized. Not everyone wants to upload videos on the internet with the explicit goal of making money. Professional creators are a very tiny minority, and a platform like YouTube will always be better suited for them (your &amp;#39;small&amp;#39; channel with 100K subscribers is actually in the top 0.5-0.1% of YouTube). There is no reason for Peertube to go after this specific demographic.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. However, significant hurdles to adoption remain, including a lack of diverse content for general audiences &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48763981&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a promising system, and I&amp;#39;d probably use it over a non-federated video hosting system if I wanted to run a video hosting site of some kind. Yet it&amp;#39;s currently hard to find a real usecase for it, since neither the content you want nor audience is there on PeerTube at the moment. If you&amp;#39;re interested in open source software or data privacy you might find something here or there, but topics like gaming, music, sports or movies are very much underserved on the platform at the moment, and get…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, concerns regarding the hosting of pirated material &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48764426&quot; title=&quot;Stupid question: when people inevitably use this for pirate content, and the feds try to shut the service down ... what&amp;#39;s the plan?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, and a user experience that some find inferior to centralized alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48764200&quot; title=&quot;I like the idea of all of these federated services but why does the UX always feel like an afterthought when it is the most important factor for adoption?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48765558&quot; title=&quot;Do you have precise suggestion of what to improve? I&amp;#39;m genuinely interested.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tedium.co/2026/07/01/online-web-forums-retrospective/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bring back crappy forums&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tedium.co)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48755731&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;590 points · 359 comments · by pentagrama&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This retrospective explores the history and decline of web forums, arguing that while modern social media offers scale and engagement, it lacks the intimate community feel of the &amp;#34;crappy&amp;#34; Perl and PHP-based message boards that defined the early internet. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tedium.co/2026/07/01/online-web-forums-retrospective/&quot; title=&quot;Title: What We Lost When We Quit Using Crappy Old Web Forums    URL Source: https://tedium.co/2026/07/01/online-web-forums-retrospective/    Published Time: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 13:05:29 GMT    Markdown Content:  **Today in Tedium:** Recently, I passed 20,000 followers on Bluesky, which I didn’t really say anything about. Sure, I thought about it, but then I had decided to myself, what’s the point? Soon, there will be another mark I can point to and feel weird about. The thing about social media these…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While modern tree-structured platforms like Reddit and Hacker News offer superior UI for following diverse, multi-threaded conversations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48756482&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; We tried the forum thing. We wanted something else. Not necessarily because it was better, though sure, maybe it was. But because it was different. I don&amp;#39;t think the novelty explains very much, the digg/reddit comment tree format is a clear improvement in the sense that it makes it easier to find and track interesting discussions. I always liked the aspect that you could follow a coherent back and forth where the people carrying the conversation tend to change with each comment. Even with all…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, they suffer from a short &amp;#34;shelf life&amp;#34; that prioritizes breaking news over long-term, focused expertise &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48757777&quot; title=&quot;The downside with reddit-/hn-style comment is that, while they provide a superior UI for discussions, the liveliness of the discussions have a shelf life of a day. It makes it&amp;#39;s hard to get a high quality discussion about new/breaking topics. What I mean is that, for new products, the threads that get the greatest discussion liquidity are those where not a single person knows a thing about it. So you&amp;#39;ll get hundreds to thousands of comments that don&amp;#39;t have a clue. In this world, influence…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents of traditional forums argue that chronological layouts are better for building multi-decade knowledge bases and maintaining social cohesion through a single shared narrative &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758924&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m on a few classic forums with threads that are over 20 years old, with a wealth of information about a topic. It is easier to revisit a thread and find new posts when posts are in chronological order. Most such forums remember the last post of your last visit, and takes you to after that position the next time you enter the thread. Tree views get tedious to revisit after they have reached a critical amount of posts, especially if subtrees can shift position from up/down-clicks. So threads…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48756843&quot; title=&quot;Forums are good in the way that they force everyone to mostly stay on a single topic of discussion. A bit like having one TV news channel that everyone is forced to watch and discuss. You can have tangents but it’s largely discouraged. The Reddit Digg style doesn’t have this and is yet another example of the culture fracturing into a thousand little things rather than one single narrative everyone can talk about. I get the benefits of the new Reddit model but I think it’s bad for social…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics note that the decline of forums was driven by the security and maintenance nightmares of &amp;#34;crappy&amp;#34; legacy software &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758811&quot; title=&quot;The word &amp;#39;crappy&amp;#39; stood out to me. I feel the same sentiment about bringing back forums, but as a person who maintained few of those for many years, I always wanted explicitly non-crappy forums. In fact, I attribute much of the decline of forums to the fact that they were crappy and hard to maintain. Those PHP/Ruby monstrousities, with plugin system that was a security and maintaiability nightmare, made maintaining a forum quite a challenging task. I have some forums died purely because it was…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, as well as the superior discovery and infrastructure provided by centralized social media &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48756445&quot; title=&quot;Social media won because it&amp;#39;s better for the consumer and producer. For the producer, it&amp;#39;s free infrastructure but it&amp;#39;s also advertising. Having a large subreddit means your game getting recommended to others and potentially being seen being introduced to more people. For the consumer, these social media sites do usually do provide a better experience in showing people what they want to see and keeping away stuff they don&amp;#39;t. I&amp;#39;m sympathetic to forums just because I think if someone likes…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/immich-app/immich/discussions/29439&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Immich 3.0&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48761944&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;638 points · 290 comments · by hashier&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Immich v3.0.0 has been released, introducing major features such as non-destructive mobile photo editing, an automation workflow builder, real-time video transcoding, and improved background backups. The update includes several breaking API changes and a new &amp;#34;Recently Added&amp;#34; page for easier library navigation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/immich-app/immich/discussions/29439&quot; title=&quot;Title: v3.0.0 · immich-app/immich · Discussion #29439    URL Source: https://github.com/immich-app/immich/discussions/29439    Markdown Content:  ## v3.0.0    Welcome to Immich `v3.0.0`!    After months of hard work from the team and our amazing contributors, we&amp;#39;re thrilled to announce the next major version of Immich: `v3.0.0`! 🎉    ## Breaking changes    This release includes several breaking changes; read the full migration guide [here](https://immich.app/blog/v3-migration). _It&amp;#39;s worth mentioning that…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Immich is praised as a viable &amp;#34;drop-in&amp;#34; replacement for Apple and Google Photos, especially when paired with a VPN like Tailscale &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48768388&quot; title=&quot;Immich is such a no-brainer replacement for Apple Photos or Google Photos, combined with VPN like Tailscale, it&amp;#39;s almost a drop in replacement&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. However, a significant debate exists regarding its lack of end-to-end encryption (E2EE); some users argue E2EE is essential for privacy on cloud-hosted hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48770359&quot; title=&quot;I think the point of E2E encryption is that you could host it with a cloud provider and the provider would not be able to see your data. Kind of like how Proton Drive claims it does not know which files you have. This would force features like semantic search, face detection, video transcoding and thumbnail generation into the clients instead. Immich assumes trusting the server to have access to your photos is fine. That is always the case when you’re self-hosting. And I think that’s…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48770482&quot; title=&quot;Seriously! How do techies and devs of all people not understand that the cloud is someone else&amp;#39;s computer, and that the best way to prevent leaks, exploitation, or abuse of user data is to prevent anyone from being able to decrypt it but the end users themselves. IMO this is the single greatest problem with the selfhosted community; the idea that E2EE is only necessary for passwords and other highly sensitive PII. It should be standard for anything hosted on someone else&amp;#39;s computer. You might…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend it complicates data recovery and is unnecessary for trusted self-hosted setups &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48769354&quot; title=&quot;So many comments here about missing end to end encryption, but seriously - why would anyone want this? Lets say burglars break in and steal your homelab.  Because you don&amp;#39;t have e2ee, they can see all the photos you saved of your dead grandmother! Oh no! Or, in the more likely scenario that something happens to your phone, the lack of e2ee means that even if you lost your keys you didn&amp;#39;t lose the only memories that remain of your grandma - you just copy across the .jpgs to a new device.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. For those prioritizing encryption, Ente is frequently cited as a more polished, E2EE-capable alternative &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48767905&quot; title=&quot;When I was switching to GrapheneOS from iOS, I decided to self host my photos. I considered Immich, but I settled on Ente because of the encryption. Ente Photos is extremely polished and it&amp;#39;s comparable quality to Apple photos. It&amp;#39;s cool they keep the server open and selfhostable instead of only open clients like many e2ee projects do. I like how you can share an album and anyone can contribute to it without an account. Another cool feature is that you can select photos to lock when you hand…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48766316&quot; title=&quot;You can use https://ente.com/ (it&amp;#39;s open-source). It also makes the seemingly much better decision of storing photos in S3.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, users highlight practical hurdles such as the difficulty of importing large Google Takeout archives and the lack of a simple &amp;#34;download all&amp;#34; feature for migrating away from the platform &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48768756&quot; title=&quot;Beware that migrating back from Immich to iCloud/Google is not something Immich cares about. There is no &amp;#39;download all&amp;#39; anywhere, best way is to go to the server and get raw files from there. https://github.com/immich-app/immich/discussions/14365&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48767576&quot; title=&quot;Does anyone have any pointers on the best way to import roughly 14 Google takeout chunks into immich? I&amp;#39;ve downloaded all the chunks once, only to find them corrupted due to... Their 50gb size and using a browser in theory. One also cannot seem to use wget or alternatives because of the auth / session cookies required via Google takeout. I&amp;#39;ve yet to even broach the aspect of importing each giant bundle into immich because I&amp;#39;ve not had success in even grabbing the takeout files correctly, but…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.podman.io/2026/07/introducing-podman-v6-0-0/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Podman v6.0.0&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.podman.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48762098&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;643 points · 257 comments · by soheilpro&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Podman v6.0.0 has launched with modernized networking via Netavark and Pasta, enhanced multi-provider support for Podman Machine, a major Quadlet overhaul, and improved Docker API compatibility. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.podman.io/2026/07/introducing-podman-v6-0-0/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Introducing Podman v6.0.0    URL Source: https://blog.podman.io/2026/07/introducing-podman-v6-0-0/    Published Time: 2026-07-02T13:24:57+00:00    Markdown Content:  We’re thrilled to announce that Podman v6.0.0 is now available! This major release brings a host of significant improvements and new features designed to enhance your container management experience. You can find the latest release on our [GitHub](https://github.com/podman-container-tools/podman/releases/tag/v6.0.0), and it will be…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users consider Podman a superior, daemonless implementation that can seamlessly replace Docker by pointing to existing compose files &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48765809&quot; title=&quot;No idea why Docker is still so much more popular than Podman. Podman is obviously the better implementation. The new network stuff is a welcome improvement.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48767275&quot; title=&quot;After Docker Desktop randomly started consuming insane amounts of memory again we switched to Podman and it was literally as easy as installing it and pointing it at our docker-compose.yml. Zero changes needed and now I don’t need to keep a daemon running. Great software.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that Docker remains more popular due to its ease of use for beginners &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48767094&quot; title=&quot;I’d wager it’s mainly just that deployment is mildly more annoying and requires more disparate steps. Especially if you want to go rootless (and you should). For someone that isn’t “Linux first” (like a baby developer learning to containerize their apps), the idea of dealing with systemd unit files or kublet configs, and having to created dedicated local service accounts (and remembering to enable linger) is somewhat intimidating when compared to just installing docker, whipping up a docker…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant point of contention is Podman&amp;#39;s reliance on outdated Linux distribution repositories, which critics claim makes installing the latest version unnecessarily difficult compared to Docker’s broad support &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48769259&quot; title=&quot;As long as they refuse to support installing on Ubuntu (and other popular distros), without relying on the distro repos which are always out of date, they will continue to lose to Docker. Any serious project in this space supports as many distros as possible. It&amp;#39;s OSS, so I&amp;#39;m not complaining per se, I have no right to.  They owe me nothing. But this one issue has kept me from seriously considering Podman for years.  They don&amp;#39;t care about my use case and I therefore don&amp;#39;t care to use their…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48767435&quot; title=&quot;Are we talking windows here? On Linux and Mac I believe you can install Podman via a package manager like anything else.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, while Podman&amp;#39;s rootless architecture offers security benefits, users find the manual configuration of systemd unit files and service accounts &amp;#34;fiddly&amp;#34; and intimidating compared to Docker&amp;#39;s streamlined workflow &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48767094&quot; title=&quot;I’d wager it’s mainly just that deployment is mildly more annoying and requires more disparate steps. Especially if you want to go rootless (and you should). For someone that isn’t “Linux first” (like a baby developer learning to containerize their apps), the idea of dealing with systemd unit files or kublet configs, and having to created dedicated local service accounts (and remembering to enable linger) is somewhat intimidating when compared to just installing docker, whipping up a docker…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48767510&quot; title=&quot;Linux. It’s not the installation of podman that can be fiddly. It’s the setting up systemd unit files and local user accounts for rootless / daemonless deployment of containerized apps that can be a headache. It’s not hard. It’s just fiddly.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ubc.ca/2026/06/mrna-vaccines-are-safe-effective-and-full-of-promise/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Global review confirms mRNA vaccines are safe, effective and full of promise &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (news.ubc.ca)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48754963&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;344 points · &lt;strong&gt;470 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by coloneltcb&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ubc.ca/2026/06/mrna-vaccines-are-safe-effective-and-full-of-promise/&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the review reaffirms the safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccines, commenters argue that the initial lack of long-term data justified public hesitation and that &amp;#34;safe and effective&amp;#34; generalizations obscure the statistical risks individuals must weigh &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48755778&quot; title=&quot;You mean the stuff the whole world got injected with in 2020? Good to know! Seriously though, I am very pro-vax, but the fact that studies like these come out now is just confirmation that people had the right to doubt the safety of mRNA back then. Many people shamed others for being anti vax but everyone has the right to be careful.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48756253&quot; title=&quot;I really feel that many of the issues with mRNA vaccines and health studies in general are generalizations like “safe and effective”. Everything has statistical risks and benefits, and we should just share those front and center with people. Eg test results for X mean you have a Y% chance of having X, given your history and symptoms and other results. Here are low cost low risk marginal things you can do to improve statistical significance. Similar for vaccines, just give us the numbers clearly…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48755898&quot; title=&quot;Why would repeating a study now and getting the same result as when it was first measured in 2020 be a reason to doubt the safety? I’m also pro-vax, so I don’t think it is correct to equate ignoring the preponderance of current evidence (in 2021 or 2026) for vaccine protection as being careful. That just seems the logical fallacy sold by “vax hesitant” and social media influencers to make people feel smart to ignore statistics and “make their own choice based on intuition”&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant debate centers on the ethics of mandates and the &amp;#34;trolley problem&amp;#34; of government-compelled vaccination when rare, fatal side effects like blood clots occur without manufacturer liability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48755751&quot; title=&quot;IIRC the vaccines were provably linked to the death of young people who had blood clots they shouldn&amp;#39;t have had. The common argument made is that the vaccine saved more lives than they took, but this is pretty fucked up IMO. It&amp;#39;s the trolley problem IRL - if you force someone to get a vaccine and they die as a result, you are responsible for their death. Also, the manufacturers can never be held responsible, because they have legal immunity for the COVID vaccines.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48756083&quot; title=&quot;If these mRNA vaccines had not been pushed or mandated, more people would probably think they are safe: there will be no need for any of these reviews. But because they were pushed by the government, many people do not trust them. Sure, they were pushed and mandated for good reasons, but the problem is that a lot of people have already lost trust in the government. That trust was not lost because of one big decision. It was lost through many small, unrelated government decisions that may not…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Some participants suggest that trust cannot be rebuilt through further reviews alone, as skepticism is now deeply rooted in broader government distrust and the perceived misapplication of medical testing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48755342&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not sure this information will sway very many people. I have relatives who are all getting tested for t-cell counts related to mRNA because they are convinced they are the cause of any and all health problems they are facing. It seems like the medical professionals who are administering the tests are at least somewhat responsible for their misapplication.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48756083&quot; title=&quot;If these mRNA vaccines had not been pushed or mandated, more people would probably think they are safe: there will be no need for any of these reviews. But because they were pushed by the government, many people do not trust them. Sure, they were pushed and mandated for good reasons, but the problem is that a lot of people have already lost trust in the government. That trust was not lost because of one big decision. It was lost through many small, unrelated government decisions that may not…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2026/07/this-blog-is-written-in-en-gb/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;This blog is written in en-GB&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (shkspr.mobi)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48760289&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;354 points · &lt;strong&gt;434 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by mritzmann&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Terence Eden defends his use of British English and regional cultural references on his blog, rejecting a reader&amp;#39;s request to use more globally known tropes. He argues that maintaining his specific linguistic identity encourages readers to learn from unfamiliar contexts rather than enforcing a homogenized cultural hegemony. &lt;a href=&quot;https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2026/07/this-blog-is-written-in-en-gb/&quot; title=&quot;Title: This blog is written in en-GB    URL Source: https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2026/07/this-blog-is-written-in-en-gb/    Published Time: 2026-07-02T12:34:59+01:00    Markdown Content:  [![Image 2: Terence Eden. He has a beard and is smiling.](https://shkspr.mobi/apple-touch-icon.png)](https://shkspr.mobi/blog)[Terence Eden’s Blog](https://shkspr.mobi/blog)[![Image 3: Mastodon](blob:http://localhost/fa1da30ab36ffc5a1c66c2463941d260)](https://mastodon.social/@edent)[![Image 4:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a strong preference for the `en-GB` locale among Europeans due to its alignment with international standards like metric measurements, 24-hour time, and Monday week-starts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48761593&quot; title=&quot;If you are from Europe, even if you&amp;#39;re not living in the UK, the en-GB locale will feel a lot more familiar to you than the en-US one. It uses the dd-mm-yyyy date format like the rest of Europe, the start of the week is on Monday (vs Sunday in the US), the default paper size is A4 (vs US letter), measurement defaults are metric (indeed UK roads use imperial, but the default is otherwise metric), the time format uses 24hrs (vs AM/PM in the US).&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue for the superiority of ISO 8601 (`YYYY-MM-DD`) over both British and American date formats &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48761704&quot; title=&quot;So thankful that we use the correct date format (yyyy-mm-dd) in Sweden.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48761833&quot; title=&quot;Can I just say that, as someone born and bred in the UK, YYYY-MM-DD is the only correct way to display a date wherever you live. Anything else is as bad as using mm:hh...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others emphasize that preserving linguistic variety enriches the internet and encourages cultural engagement &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48760894&quot; title=&quot;I read several blogs that use British English, including this OP&amp;#39;s blog. Some of my favourite blogs in my RSS reader are British English blogs, or at least they use British English spellings and grammar. I find their use of the English language very charming and funny in a unique way. It surprises me that anyone would feel entitled to ask a blogger to change the variety of English they use. American English is only one of many forms of English. The world is richer for its many varieties of…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48760591&quot; title=&quot;Being proud of your culture including your language and exercising it, at the risk of readers not understanding everything immediately, is not racism. In the worst case, a non-British gets curious about one expression or the other and looks it up. That&amp;#39;s engagement.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48761042&quot; title=&quot;Certain cultures teach that diversity is a bad thing to be feared and extinguished. Diversity is only a good thing when your mind has been poisoned by &amp;#39;education&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;experience&amp;#39;. It requires an open mind to see diverse experiences as a good thing, and certain cultures think having citizens with open minds is an unprofitable way to run a society.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some British expats note that &amp;#34;self-editing&amp;#34; their natural idioms into a utilitarian style to avoid confusion can lead to flat and unnatural interactions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48760755&quot; title=&quot;I am the only Brit in the department I work in. No one gets the cultural references or British idioms I use, and I&amp;#39;ve found myself significantly changing the language I use to a very utilitarian and direct style to prevent the endless blank stares... reading this blog post just made me realise that this self-editing has made my interactions rather more &amp;#39;flat&amp;#39; and unnatural, as they now lack spontaneity, with everything passing through a secondary filter before leaving my brain.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mathstodon.xyz/@iblech/116769502749142438&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Since Linux 6.9, LUKS suspend stopped wiping disk-encryption keys from memory&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mathstodon.xyz)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48763035&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;538 points · 225 comments · by IngoBlechschmid&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A bug introduced in Linux kernel 6.9 caused LUKS disk-encryption keys to remain in memory during suspend instead of being wiped, potentially exposing data to cold boot attacks. The issue, caused by a block device refactoring, has been addressed with a one-line fix and new automated regression tests. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mathstodon.xyz/@iblech/116769502749142438&quot; title=&quot;Title: Ingo Blechschmidt (@iblech@mathstodon.xyz)    URL Source: https://mathstodon.xyz/@iblech/116769502749142438    Published Time: 2026-06-18T05:40:11Z    Markdown Content:  [![Image 1](https://media.mathstodon.xyz/accounts/avatars/116/437/586/980/807/067/original/6ab5e2eb70b0c4db.png) **Ingo Blechschmidt**@iblech@mathstodon.xyz](https://mathstodon.xyz/@iblech)    So. For the past few days I&amp;#39;ve been deep in a fun and very rewarding, but also extremely scary debugging saga. To cut a long git-bisecting…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A regression in Linux kernel 6.9 caused the `luksSuspend` command to silently fail to wipe encryption keys from memory, a feature previously used by tools like Debian’s `cryptsetup-suspend` to require a password upon waking from sleep &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48763753&quot; title=&quot;Yes, if you simply suspend your laptop on most stock Linux distributions, then everything including the master key is still kept in memory. But Debian pioneered the (optional) cryptsetup-suspend addon. This issues a luksSuspend command which is supposed to wipe the key from memory, and on resume asks you to resupply your passphrase. Up to kernel 6.8, this worked as described; starting with kernel 6.9, it silently didn&amp;#39;t.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While standard suspend-to-RAM typically retains keys in memory, hibernation (suspend-to-disk) avoids this by encrypting the RAM contents to disk and clearing the memory &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48763695&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t see any other way? When you sleep (suspend to RAM), everything is stored in RAM and is encrypted but the master key is present in kernel memory (if I recall correctly). However, if you hibernate (suspend to disk) the entire contents of RAM (including the master key) is written/encrypted to disk and the RAM is cleared. When you wake the machine up you have to re-enter the passphrase to decrypt the master key to re-load disk contents back to memory.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also contrasts LUKS with Windows&amp;#39; BitLocker, which is criticized for being proprietary and potentially sharing recovery keys with Microsoft, despite its dominance in the enterprise market &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48763900&quot; title=&quot;It absolutely is and they have most the enterprise market.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48764063&quot; title=&quot;Reminder that by using Bitlocker, you&amp;#39;re using a closed source encryption for which Microsoft will happily hand out your recovery key on request. https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2026/01/22/micro...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48764112&quot; title=&quot;Okay, yes, sure. It definitely is the most-used encryption software for Windows. But I would never trust it a second, being proprietary and known for issues. You likely know that, but for the benefit of others: 38C3 - Windows BitLocker: Screwed without a Screwdriver https://media.ccc.de/v/38c3-windows-bitlocker-screwed-withou... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eNtT2p12cM&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48764268&quot; title=&quot;if by &amp;#39;great&amp;#39; you really mean &amp;#39;fine&amp;#39;. It&amp;#39;s still brittle, awkward and puzzlingly awful UX despite being the literal standard for the platform. Compare it to any of the actively maintained alternatives, Filevault for MacOS (which is wonderful and never sends your key to be kept somewhere else) or LUKS on Linux.. heck, even Veracrypt is actually easier to understand and more robust.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/crime-pays-the-egg-bandits-made-a&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Egg Bandits Made a Thousand Times the Fine They Just Paid for Price Fixing&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (thebignewsletter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48761229&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;501 points · 256 comments · by toomuchtodo&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/crime-pays-the-egg-bandits-made-a&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a deep frustration with a legal system where price-fixing fines are negligible compared to the profits gained, leading some to suggest that current penalties effectively encourage corporate corruption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48763478&quot; title=&quot;We really need to bring back corporal punishment, both for petty crimes and white collar crimes. The prison sentences don&amp;#39;t make sense for the petty crimes, and the fines don&amp;#39;t make sense for the white collar crimes. We need to legalize public caning and the stocks.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48761977&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;ll show em! (that they should continue with the price fixing). I look forward to the day when we no longer have a pro-corruption government.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that market concentration and a lack of competition enable such behavior &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48763172&quot; title=&quot;Things like this mainly occur in markets with little competition, killing of small business causes issues like this. Much of our grievances are caused by our high level of market concentration.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others debate whether the solution lies in harsher individual liability, long prison sentences for white-collar crimes, or even the return of public corporal punishment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48763478&quot; title=&quot;We really need to bring back corporal punishment, both for petty crimes and white collar crimes. The prison sentences don&amp;#39;t make sense for the petty crimes, and the fines don&amp;#39;t make sense for the white collar crimes. We need to legalize public caning and the stocks.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48764408&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;It&amp;#39;s so fun how corporations are protected from individual liability They&amp;#39;re not. If you hire a hitman through a corporation it doesn&amp;#39;t magically become legal.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48763851&quot; title=&quot;we dont need new punishments, the system is just backwards. for things like shoplifting and vandalism it should be double or triple damages with no prison. corporate fraud, cartels, pollution, big time tax evasion has to come with 20+ year sentences and fines based on your income like a traffic violation in norway. flat fines just dont work when the criminal is rich. in general we should be a lot more strict on sexual crimes (sa, trafficking, child abuse but not voluntary prostitution) and…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant disillusionment regarding how the &amp;#34;egg crisis&amp;#34; was originally framed as a result of avian flu and inflation, which many now view as a deceptive cover for price fixing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48764946&quot; title=&quot;I did not realize the egg crisis was found to be price fixing operation. As I recall during the whole thing the news was non-stop about how it was related to broad-based inflation, chicken culling for avian flu, etc. Seems like all that was a lie, or at least merely a half-truth.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48765752&quot; title=&quot;It was 100% due to Biden. (Or so I was told. Might even be the reason we have Trump 2.0?)&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://righttointelligence.org/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Protect your right to run local AI&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (righttointelligence.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48768951&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;547 points · 196 comments · by thoughtpeddler&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Right to Intelligence initiative advocates for the legal right to download, own, and run open AI models locally on personal devices without mandatory licensing or cloud-based restrictions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://righttointelligence.org/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Right to Intelligence    URL Source: https://righttointelligence.org/    Markdown Content:  01 / what it is    Local AI is the next personal computer.    Not a chatbot account. Not a rented API. A model you can run on your own machine, inspect, repair, improve, and use without asking a platform to stay online. That is the line RTI exists to protect.    ![Image 1: A laptop running a small AI model locally](https://righttointelligence.org/beats/beat-01-local.webp)    02 / what we want    Protect lawful…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether lobbying from major AI firms like OpenAI and Anthropic will successfully restrict local, open-source AI to protect their high valuations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48769407&quot; title=&quot;Given the state of corruption in politics, I think Anthropic and OpenAI will likely bribe … oh wait I mean “lobby” … for bans on open source. Otherwise their imaginary trillion dollar valuations make no sense.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that hardware OEMs (Nvidia, Dell, HP) have superior lobbying power and are already betting heavily on local LLM infrastructure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48773377&quot; title=&quot;Laws restricting the use of local AI/LLMs are not going to happen, no matter how much Anthropic might want it. All the major OEMs are now counting on local LLMs to take off. Just look at the OEM support for the upcoming Nvidia RTX Spark platform: Asus, Dell, HP, Lenovo, Microsoft, MSI. All the big names in the industry will have, by the end of this year, Nvidia-powered machines made specifically for local LLM use.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48774997&quot; title=&quot;And this is exactly my point, the OEMs have more lobbying power and leverage. Anthropic might be valuated at whatever amount, but they&amp;#39;re a new player and their only product is a piece of software - which others like Google, OpenAI, etc also have (not identical but similar enough). EDIT: FYI https://ibb.co/nMYP34Rr&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others point to restrictive precedents in 3D printing and EU energy regulations as evidence that government intervention is possible &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48774913&quot; title=&quot;You seem to be so sure, but lobbying in the US can do incredible (and stupid) things. Look at the 3d printing control laws that are being passed in NY&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48771361&quot; title=&quot;The EU did not ban 8K TV’s, this is a very misleading spin. They put energy consumption restrictions some TV’s violated years ago. Manufacturers have already responded with more efficient TV’s, which actually means the restriction is working as intended towards a good outcome IMO. You can absolutely buy 8K TV’s in Europe. No EU country has banned air conditioning either. Where are you getting this information?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable anecdotes include the potential for open-weights AI to revolutionize independent farming through robotic labor &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48770243&quot; title=&quot;Mock it we might now, but 12 acres and (not too distant future) open weights AI models capable of driving open source robots for farm labor would be huge. No need for huge expensive purpose built tractors. Even if they’re slow you could have half a dozen running 24/7. It could provide independence for anyone with a modicum of resources.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, and the observation that Chinese research is currently more &amp;#34;open&amp;#34; than the closed systems favored by US companies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48769488&quot; title=&quot;Llama, ik-Llama, Krasis, etc are already out. The Chinese are the open ones, with free downloads, open weights, and loads of published research. The USA with OpenAI is some of the most closed shit out there.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://pradyuprasad.com/writings/how-to-ask-for-help/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How to ask for help from people who don&amp;#39;t know you&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (pradyuprasad.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48761118&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;530 points · 83 comments · by FigurativeVoid&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To successfully ask strangers for help, you must prioritize the recipient&amp;#39;s perspective by demonstrating &amp;#34;proof of work&amp;#34; to establish credibility, providing concise context, and making the request specific, low-friction, and easy to decline. &lt;a href=&quot;https://pradyuprasad.com/writings/how-to-ask-for-help/&quot; title=&quot;Title: How to ask for help from people who don&amp;#39;t know you    URL Source: https://pradyuprasad.com/writings/how-to-ask-for-help/    Published Time: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 07:49:48 GMT    Markdown Content:  30 June 2026    No matter what you’re doing, from building a civilization on Mars to getting a summer internship, you will have to ask people for help. Yet, most people get this crucial skill wrong. They put themselves at the front of their request, when they should be putting the other person there. But…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Effective outreach to strangers requires a clear, specific &amp;#34;ask&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;proof of work&amp;#34; to demonstrate that you have already attempted to solve the problem yourself &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48764095&quot; title=&quot;This was an excellently written, salient post with some good tidbits. I&amp;#39;ve learned some of these lessons the hard way. I&amp;#39;ll add a few. Proof of work is important, but it&amp;#39;s not about the magnitude of energy you spend. I went through two iterations of reaching out to my college network. The first time I put so much time into handwriting notes and trying to provide my relatable background. 100 notes, not a single response. The second time I sent emails that were a few sentences. I had a much…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48763752&quot; title=&quot;The problem here is that most points are about how to formulate your ask. I think the biggest thing is that you&amp;#39;re much more likely to get help if you show you&amp;#39;re doing the best to solve it yourself. There&amp;#39;s a big difference between: &amp;#39;Hey, I saw this job at [company you work at], could you refer me please? I&amp;#39;m [lists skills and experience]&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;Hey I&amp;#39;m thinking of applying to [company you work at] for the product designer position and I want to make an impression, so I&amp;#39;m putting together a…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters emphasize that showing you have engaged with a person&amp;#39;s published work or providing a structured agenda respects their time and significantly increases response rates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48764095&quot; title=&quot;This was an excellently written, salient post with some good tidbits. I&amp;#39;ve learned some of these lessons the hard way. I&amp;#39;ll add a few. Proof of work is important, but it&amp;#39;s not about the magnitude of energy you spend. I went through two iterations of reaching out to my college network. The first time I put so much time into handwriting notes and trying to provide my relatable background. 100 notes, not a single response. The second time I sent emails that were a few sentences. I had a much…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48764173&quot; title=&quot;For technical requests, one of the most effective ways to demonstrate that you are serious is to cite something about the person&amp;#39;s published work that is relevant to the request.  There is no more effective way to get someone&amp;#39;s attention than showing that you have read and appreciated something they&amp;#39;ve written.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48768211&quot; title=&quot;One thing that always bugs me at work is when I get a slack message from someone I don&amp;#39;t know along the lines of: &amp;#39;Hello John, are you available to chat later today about Foo Product?&amp;#39; Or sometimes just: &amp;#39;Hello John&amp;#39; I know they want something from me, but I have no idea what, how much effort it will require, how urgent it is, or whether I am even capable of helping. A much better approach is more like this article outlines: &amp;#39;Hello John. I&amp;#39;m looking into in a client-reported issue with Foo…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest offering payment to signal seriousness &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48764060&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been DM&amp;#39;ing randos on LinkedIn for lightweight consults and found that offering to pay up front and asking strangers to price their own time can help to show seriousness and often results in free interactions or buy-me-a-coffee pricing. e.g. &amp;#39;Hey I love your work on X, I&amp;#39;ve been thinking about / working on related thing Y and would love your feedback on aspect Z. How much $$ to rent your brain for 20 minutes? I&amp;#39;m mainly wondering what you think/know about specific questions A, B, and C.&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others note that for certain experts, the intellectual interest of the question is a stronger motivator than money &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48764500&quot; title=&quot;Maybe that&amp;#39;s linkedin people. There are others like me: there is no such thing as 20 minutes. If I take on something, it&amp;#39;s at least 10 hours effective. So we would just flat out refuse any such offer while on the other hand you can get those hours free if the question is sufficiently interesting.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a growing concern that using LLMs to draft these requests may soon become a negative signal &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48764798&quot; title=&quot;unfortunately everyone is now doing this with LLMs, it actually feels like it might be on its way to being a negative signal, as strange as that sounds.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://japannews.yomiuri.co.jp/science-nature/technology/20260306-314930/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI can&amp;#39;t be listed as inventor on patent applications, Japan&amp;#39;s top court rules&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (japannews.yomiuri.co.jp)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48761536&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;398 points · 209 comments · by mushstory&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://japannews.yomiuri.co.jp/science-nature/technology/20260306-314930/&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Japanese court&amp;#39;s ruling aligns with a global legal consensus that intellectual property rights are reserved for human creators, effectively placing AI-generated output into the public domain &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48762629&quot; title=&quot;This is consistent with rulings in other courts globally around IP rights. IP protects content created by humans. Your AI slop is effectively public domain.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48762812&quot; title=&quot;Sanity! No AI has accountability so also should not own any benefits (not only patent but anything beneficial). Violate that and you created a blackhole of value creation.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. This has sparked a debate over the utility of patents: some argue they are an outdated &amp;#34;intellectual monopoly&amp;#34; that fails to improve innovation, while others insist they are essential for recouping the massive R&amp;amp;D costs required in industries like pharmaceuticals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48763480&quot; title=&quot;The book “against intellectual monopoly” has shaped a lot of my thinking on this topic - economists have looked at the various occasions in which patents were introduced into an industry (or extended in scope), and there is no evidence they actually improve innovation/efficiency/outcomes (including the pharma industry!). I was quite surprised as my whole life, it was sold to me as an incentive-boosting measure which in turn would lead to said outcomes. With that lens, I welcome gradually…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48764694&quot; title=&quot;You spend billions to get a drug from concept to approval - and then once you&amp;#39;ve invested all that money, someone else can just sell it too, free loading on all the studies you ran? Why would anyone invest in drug studies? I need a bit more depth and detail to believe that this doesn&amp;#39;t destroy the pharma industry. What would the empirical evidence even look like? It&amp;#39;s not like the modern pharma industry existed before patents.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48763765&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m having a hard time even grappling with how that could be true? I always assumed that intellectual property was invented in order to protect against a specific use case: If researching a new product is extremely cost intensive.  But once a product is invented, it is easy to reverse engineer how the product works.  Then the first firm will need intellectual property to put in the initial cost, otherwise they will not do so, as they know they will not have enough time to recoup their costs in…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48763949&quot; title=&quot;Indeed. Patents incentivize investment in R&amp;amp;D. There is an argument to be made that the scope of patentable inventions should be more limited, in particular preventing trivial patents that didn’t require substantial R&amp;amp;D, and maybe also that patents shouldn’t last as long. But doing away completely with patents would certainly stifle companies’ willingness to invest in R&amp;amp;D. They’d rather wait for someone else to invent something they can copy.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Commentators are now questioning whether this precedent will eventually dismantle the patent system entirely or simply lead to a lack of accountability for AI-generated works &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48762812&quot; title=&quot;Sanity! No AI has accountability so also should not own any benefits (not only patent but anything beneficial). Violate that and you created a blackhole of value creation.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48762944&quot; title=&quot;Oh, please let it be the second option. Let AI be the thing that kills the &amp;#39;intellectual property&amp;#39; because humans will never manage to shake off that terribly wrong decision by themselves.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48763177&quot; title=&quot;You can&amp;#39;t prove something is/isn&amp;#39;t created with AI. Also, if AI generated content cannot be copyrighted, they can&amp;#39;t infringe copyright as well&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.blog/changelog/2026-07-01-kimi-k2-7-is-now-available-in-github-copilot/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Kimi K2.7 Code is generally available in GitHub Copilot&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.blog)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48756602&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;416 points · 182 comments · by unliftedq&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GitHub has made Kimi K2.7 Code generally available as the first open-weight model option in GitHub Copilot, offering a lower-cost alternative for developers across various platforms including Visual Studio Code and JetBrains. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.blog/changelog/2026-07-01-kimi-k2-7-is-now-available-in-github-copilot/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Kimi K2.7 Code is generally available in GitHub Copilot    URL Source: https://github.blog/changelog/2026-07-01-kimi-k2-7-is-now-available-in-github-copilot/    Published Time: 2026-07-01T12:00:21-07:00    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: The Copilot model picker showing Kimi K2.7 selected](https://github.blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/613814751-fc2b8d48-e76b-4c8e-860d-f140edb0c792.png?resize=2064%2C600)    ## Table of Contents    *   [Availability in GitHub…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on a significant exodus from GitHub Copilot following a recent pricing model change that users describe as an &amp;#34;insane price hike&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48757883&quot; title=&quot;I used GitHub Copilot for my VS 2026 development and switched between ChatGPT and Claude. That was before I discovered Claude Code and the Codex app. Copilot was OK for my purposes, and the USD 10 per month fee was enough for my usage. However, last month they introduced a new pricing model ( I know the old pricing was not sustainable), and my USD 10 was exhausted within days. Because of that, I switched to Claude Code and Codex and have never looked back. Yes, tokens on Claude Code and Codex…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758579&quot; title=&quot;I am a huge fan of Copilot CLI. It just feels so logical and low-friction to use compared to Claude Code. Having the ability to juggle various models at will is really nice too. (&amp;#39;Plan this using Opus 4.6, let GPT 5.4 verify the plan and give feedback before implementing with Sonnet 4.6&amp;#39;). Unfortunately the June pricing change for Copilot forced me personally as well as my entire department at work to switch to Claude Code. With copilot we were hitting a few dollars of extra spend over the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some developers are migrating to competitors like Claude Code and Codex for better value &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48757883&quot; title=&quot;I used GitHub Copilot for my VS 2026 development and switched between ChatGPT and Claude. That was before I discovered Claude Code and the Codex app. Copilot was OK for my purposes, and the USD 10 per month fee was enough for my usage. However, last month they introduced a new pricing model ( I know the old pricing was not sustainable), and my USD 10 was exhausted within days. Because of that, I switched to Claude Code and Codex and have never looked back. Yes, tokens on Claude Code and Codex…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758579&quot; title=&quot;I am a huge fan of Copilot CLI. It just feels so logical and low-friction to use compared to Claude Code. Having the ability to juggle various models at will is really nice too. (&amp;#39;Plan this using Opus 4.6, let GPT 5.4 verify the plan and give feedback before implementing with Sonnet 4.6&amp;#39;). Unfortunately the June pricing change for Copilot forced me personally as well as my entire department at work to switch to Claude Code. With copilot we were hitting a few dollars of extra spend over the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others are abandoning cloud-based AI entirely in favor of local rigs running open models like Qwen 3.6 to ensure long-term reliability and control &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758964&quot; title=&quot;Gotta say, I&amp;#39;ve lost all interest in cloud-based AI products. Too many cool features and workflows that I was once excited about that I can&amp;#39;t or don&amp;#39;t use anymore for a variety of reasons (price hikes, subjectively nerfed, disappeared altogether, replaced,...) for me to even remember. It&amp;#39;s tiring. I&amp;#39;ve set up a small rig, mostly settled on Qwen3.6 and I&amp;#39;m slowly adding features myself. It probably can&amp;#39;t compete with Claude. I don&amp;#39;t even know, I&amp;#39;ve stopped checking. It&amp;#39;s providing a ton of value…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48759458&quot; title=&quot;I never got into any of the AI models because it was clear local first was going to be more valueable, if they were to replace coding tasks. I tried out a few models and ended up going with either Qwen3-Coder-Next (no think, just do) and Qwen3.6-35B (thinking, w/llamacpp token budget). Created a customized prompt that works fairly well to around ~60k tokens and then is a toss up on whether it&amp;#39;s poisoned itself or I&amp;#39;ve directly steered it into the wrong. When it&amp;#39;s clear that&amp;#39;s happened, if it&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a notable consensus that local setups, particularly using Mac Minis or older GPUs, have become highly capable and offer a &amp;#34;sober&amp;#34; alternative to the volatility of VC-funded, non-deterministic cloud services &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758964&quot; title=&quot;Gotta say, I&amp;#39;ve lost all interest in cloud-based AI products. Too many cool features and workflows that I was once excited about that I can&amp;#39;t or don&amp;#39;t use anymore for a variety of reasons (price hikes, subjectively nerfed, disappeared altogether, replaced,...) for me to even remember. It&amp;#39;s tiring. I&amp;#39;ve set up a small rig, mostly settled on Qwen3.6 and I&amp;#39;m slowly adding features myself. It probably can&amp;#39;t compete with Claude. I don&amp;#39;t even know, I&amp;#39;ve stopped checking. It&amp;#39;s providing a ton of value…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48759458&quot; title=&quot;I never got into any of the AI models because it was clear local first was going to be more valueable, if they were to replace coding tasks. I tried out a few models and ended up going with either Qwen3-Coder-Next (no think, just do) and Qwen3.6-35B (thinking, w/llamacpp token budget). Created a customized prompt that works fairly well to around ~60k tokens and then is a toss up on whether it&amp;#39;s poisoned itself or I&amp;#39;ve directly steered it into the wrong. When it&amp;#39;s clear that&amp;#39;s happened, if it&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48759690&quot; title=&quot;Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q4_K_M runs at about 11 tokens/second on my poor old 1060. Absolutely nuts how far we&amp;#39;ve come&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48760174&quot; title=&quot;I assumed the 27B dense model would be preferable to a MoE model, and that it wouldn’t fit into a consumer graphics card, which leaves the Macs. Then I assumed for cost and battery/heat reasons that a Mini would be better than a laptop.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the cost concerns, some see GitHub’s integration of the Kimi K2.7 model as a positive step toward providing a trusted platform for high-performance Chinese models&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SH9QRTAlL02THgAN2AGmWe9El0_2ZJF6hhgDBx8k97c/edit?tab=t.0&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why I&amp;#39;m Forced to Say Farewell: Google Management Has Lost Its Moral Compass&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (docs.google.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758970&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;333 points · 255 comments · by vrganj&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;René Mayrhofer, Google’s former Director of Android Platform Security, is resigning from the company, citing a loss of moral compass in management and a shift in corporate culture that he believes prioritizes profit over ethical principles. &lt;a href=&quot;https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SH9QRTAlL02THgAN2AGmWe9El0_2ZJF6hhgDBx8k97c/edit?tab=t.0&quot; title=&quot;rmayrhofer: Leaving Google    Why I’m Forced to Say Farewell: Google Management Has Lost Its Moral Compass [go/rmayrhofer-leaving-note] When Google offered me the job of Director of Android Platform Security in 2017, it was impossible to refuse. Yes, Trump was already president—my family and I had qualms—but he seemed conta...&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on whether Google’s culture has fundamentally shifted, with some arguing the company was already engaging in &amp;#34;sleazy&amp;#34; behavior nine years ago &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48761091&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Google was a different company 9 years ago. No it wasn’t.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48761163&quot; title=&quot;yeah, looks like some history rewriting. 9 years ago was 2017-- and by that time Google was already doing sleazy SEO shit, scanning peoples emails to who them ads, trying to make ads seem like general search results etc etc Google was *exactly* this company it is today&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48763018&quot; title=&quot;Was it different or are the people who voluntarily started working for Google around that period unable to admit to themselves and others that it was always questionable to work for a entity like Google? To certain observers this was obviously the direction tech monopolies were going to go. What have those people always seen that you&amp;#39;re only now beginning to admit is an inherently defective aspect of these organizations?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, while others maintain the internal environment has tangibly soured &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48762828&quot; title=&quot;I worked at Google for a similar span. It was different 9 years ago, in ways that are specifically described in the blog post you&amp;#39;re ignoring, which I and many other Googlers would confirm are true.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. A cynical consensus suggests that &amp;#34;moral clarity&amp;#34; often coincides with the vesting of financial incentives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48759304&quot; title=&quot;moral clarity usually sharpens the moment the last RSU hits the brokerage account&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, though former employees counter that the rolling nature of RSU grants means most departures require leaving significant money on the table &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48760209&quot; title=&quot;Sometimes. Sometimes not. I left with more than 4 million in RSU&amp;#39;s left. Pretty much any Googler who leaves will be leaving lots of money on the table. This is because they are usually 3/4 year grants, so it&amp;#39;s pretty much impossible to leave without lots of unvested RSU. There are some 1 year grants, but those are much more uncommon (~1%)&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48760616&quot; title=&quot;And yet it directly speaks to the comment it was replying to. It makes the point that RSUs are generally multi-year; so if you&amp;#39;re getting them with _any_ frequency, you never get to the point of &amp;#39;the last RSU vests&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48760882&quot; title=&quot;It remains privileged.  I have my golden handcuffs too, probably most on HN do. That doesn’t change the reality expressed.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users reflect a broader disillusionment with American Big Tech, viewing the industry as having transitioned into a &amp;#34;darker&amp;#34; and more toxic force &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758998&quot; title=&quot;This mirrors my own experience as a European that worked at FAANG in the Bay Area. It used to be a dream job. Now I&amp;#39;ve relocated back to Europe and want nothing to do with American Big Tech. It&amp;#39;s become toxic and completely counter to my values. America has become a much darker place that has a very different place in the world. American tech companies have not just accepted, but actively embraced this transition. I am not interested in joining them and being complicit.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48761238&quot; title=&quot;The &amp;#39;Don&amp;#39;t be evil&amp;#39; motto was diluted in 2015 when alphabet was formed, and taken down in 2018, so yeah, things were brewing from before.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://makerspet.com/blog/building-an-open-source-robot-vacuum-meet-oomwoo/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Oomwoo, an open-source robot vacuum you build yourself&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (makerspet.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48755005&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;477 points · 97 comments · by devicelimit&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Makers Pet has launched OOMWOO, an open-source, 3D-printable robot vacuum designed for local-first operation using Raspberry Pi, ROS 2, and 2D LiDAR. The project features a hackable, cloud-free design that integrates with Home Assistant, allowing users to build and customize their own high-quality home appliance. &lt;a href=&quot;https://makerspet.com/blog/building-an-open-source-robot-vacuum-meet-oomwoo/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Building an Open-Source Robot Vacuum — Meet OOMWOO - Makers Pet    URL Source: https://makerspet.com/blog/building-an-open-source-robot-vacuum-meet-oomwoo/    Published Time: 2026-06-14T21:38:37-07:00    Markdown Content:  [Skip to content](https://makerspet.com/blog/building-an-open-source-robot-vacuum-meet-oomwoo/#main)     No results    *   [Home](https://makerspet.com/)  *   [Store](https://makerspet.com/store/)  *   [Learn](https://makerspet.com/learn/)      *   [Tutorials &amp;amp;…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While users appreciate the goal of an open-source, repairable robot vacuum to avoid privacy concerns and planned obsolescence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48755944&quot; title=&quot;Even though it’s vibe coded, I like the idea of an open source repairable robot vacuum. The current generation of them are notoriously not built to last / be repairable.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48755674&quot; title=&quot;I am bone tired of slop.  This looks like a useful thing to build (the cameras in existing closed source robo vacuums creep me out), but when people don&amp;#39;t even write their announcement blog post by hand it gives me zero confidence in the project getting anywhere meaningful. Perhaps not the place to share this, but it&amp;#39;s depressing.  I hope this proves me wrong.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, many argue that existing commercial units like Roborock and Xiaomi are already surprisingly durable and easy to repair with cheap parts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48756677&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t know why you would say that, my Xiaomi s6&amp;#39;s wheel motor died, I was bummed about it. I ordered a replacement motor, and to my surprise, I only had to open one or two screws and the motor module popped right out. The module had a nice slitting connector. I put the new motor back in and I was done. The thing must be at least 8 years old by now and it&amp;#39;s still chugging along. I now passed it on to my parents and it&amp;#39;s cleaning their house.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48756701&quot; title=&quot;Agreed. I have a 6.5 year old Roborock S5 Max, and it still works fine. I&amp;#39;ve replaced a few parts (can still get on AliExpress), but other than that no issues. It&amp;#39;s cleaned 74km2.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. A major point of contention is the project&amp;#39;s reliance on AI-generated &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; for its announcement and documentation, which some feel undermines its credibility while others view it as a necessary bootstrapping tool &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48755674&quot; title=&quot;I am bone tired of slop.  This looks like a useful thing to build (the cameras in existing closed source robo vacuums creep me out), but when people don&amp;#39;t even write their announcement blog post by hand it gives me zero confidence in the project getting anywhere meaningful. Perhaps not the place to share this, but it&amp;#39;s depressing.  I hope this proves me wrong.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48756889&quot; title=&quot;Isn&amp;#39;t a AI generated blog post better than someone building a  useful thing and nobody hearing about it?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48756194&quot; title=&quot;Agreed. I can code so I don&amp;#39;t care whether it&amp;#39;s vibecoded or whatever to bootstrap. Them working on designing hardware is what matters to me. I&amp;#39;ll definitely keep an eye out for the kit, I don&amp;#39;t have a lot of patience for hunting parts but would love to play with this.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48756232&quot; title=&quot;The issue I have is the documentation and “status” is slop. Looking at the repo, how much of it is even real? There’s supposed to be a build-along on YouTube but nothing there yet. The BoM is a bunch of aliexpress modules which is ok, but what about the chassis? Is that image generated? The RFC calls to generate accurate models for the components, but the render looks like a full assembly?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, critics note that building a custom unit from scratch is significantly more expensive than buying a commercial vacuum and flashing it with open-source firmware like Valetudo &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48757558&quot; title=&quot;The hardware is an issue, not because it&amp;#39;s bad but because it&amp;#39;s massively expensive to buy the components piecemeal. You can purchase a lidar vac for £70-80 now. Even if you only replaced the brains, that&amp;#39;s a quarter of the price of a Oomwoo. The only upgrade I&amp;#39;d want is self-emptying. You&amp;#39;d probably have to relocate the charging contacts but it seems highly achievable. Or you could break up an existing vac for the parts. You&amp;#39;d get the lidar, bumper, ToF, cliff sensors, motors and wheels,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48757628&quot; title=&quot;For that, there&amp;#39;s https://valetudo.cloud/ that supports a number of models from different brands.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mathstodon.xyz/@mjd/115096720350507897&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The primary purpose of code review is to find code that will be hard to maintain&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mathstodon.xyz)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48759870&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;378 points · 176 comments · by ColinWright&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mark Dominus argues that the primary purpose of code review is to identify code that is difficult to maintain rather than to guarantee it is bug-free. He contends that if a reviewer cannot understand the code, it should be fixed while the author is still familiar with it. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mathstodon.xyz/@mjd/115096720350507897&quot; title=&quot;Title: Mark Dominus (@mjd@mathstodon.xyz)    URL Source: https://mathstodon.xyz/@mjd/115096720350507897    Published Time: 2025-08-26T19:29:37Z    Markdown Content:  #### Recent searches    No recent searches    #### Search options    Only available when logged in.    **mathstodon.xyz** is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.    [![Image 1](https://media.mathstodon.xyz/site_uploads/files/000/000/002/@1x/c2d0c9932cd25b26.png)](https://mathstodon.xyz/about)    A…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the author argues that maintainability is the primary goal of code review, commenters suggest it serves as a critical mechanism for knowledge transfer, institutional memory, and team ownership &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48761588&quot; title=&quot;What I find to be maybe the single most important part of code review is knowledge transfer. Our entire small team thumbs up a PR before it&amp;#39;s merged unless there&amp;#39;s a big rush on it, and this gives everyone on the team a rough idea of the state of the codebase at any given time. There&amp;#39;s no being blindsided like &amp;#39;this whole system I depend on is gone&amp;#39; like I had happen at far more siloed places I&amp;#39;ve worked. Beyond that, it gives a forum to ask questions about how things work to further build…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48761461&quot; title=&quot;My attitude has always been that code review is best thought of as the gate where code goes from being owned by the author to being owned by the team or project. The code I&amp;#39;m reviewing is not your code, it is code that is about to become our code. Maintainability is a major factor in that, of course.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48761886&quot; title=&quot;We even find ourselves creating PRs in situations where the code is going to be merged immediately anyway, and tagging other devs, just so they have a convenient way to see what got merged and why. So people don&amp;#39;t lose track of what is in the codebase.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Reviews act as a safety check against malicious code and a forum for mentorship, allowing juniors to learn from seniors and vice versa &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48763548&quot; title=&quot;Code review doesn&amp;#39;t have a single purpose. Finding code that is hard to maintain is one of those, and and an important one, but certainly not the only one, and I&amp;#39;m not sure it is even the most important one. Other purposes include: - a safety check to ensure that if a developer (or AI) goes rogue, it is more difficult to merge malicious code - a second perspective from someone who isn&amp;#39;t as close to the problem and might see a better way to do things, or problems that the original developer…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view reviews as a tool for enforcing hierarchy or avoiding &amp;#34;clever&amp;#34; but unfixable code &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48761424&quot; title=&quot;The primary purpose of code review is to maintain existing hierarchy by preventing junior SWEs from getting promoted by committing code that is smarter than what the senior architect can understand.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48761470&quot; title=&quot;If the code is so smart that it&amp;#39;s not easily understandable, it&amp;#39;s not easily fixable.  My transition from junior to senior was accompanied by the realization that simpler is nearly always better.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others have shifted toward rapid, binary &amp;#34;passable&amp;#34; checks to cope with AI-generated code volume &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48762184&quot; title=&quot;Such a luxury, I am envious! Our team started using AI, so I switched to a simple method: no comments, and a binary &amp;#39;is this batshit crazy or passable&amp;#39; approval decision rule. Saving myself time and sanity.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/02/alphabet-google-android-eu-antitrust-fine-4-1-billion-euro-appeal.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Google loses fight over record $4.7B EU antitrust fine&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cnbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758309&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;286 points · 229 comments · by boshomi&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Europe’s top court has dismissed Google’s final appeal, upholding a record 4.1 billion euro ($4.67 billion) antitrust fine for abusing the dominance of its Android operating system to stifle competition. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/02/alphabet-google-android-eu-antitrust-fine-4-1-billion-euro-appeal.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Google loses fight over record $4.7 billion EU antitrust fine    URL Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/02/alphabet-google-android-eu-antitrust-fine-4-1-billion-euro-appeal.html    Published Time: 2026-07-02T07:44:44+0000    Markdown Content:  [Skip Navigation](https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/02/alphabet-google-android-eu-antitrust-fine-4-1-billion-euro-appeal.html#MainContent)    [![Image 2: CNBC…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether EU antitrust fines are legitimate enforcement of market rules or a form of protectionist &amp;#34;tariff&amp;#34; against American innovation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758690&quot; title=&quot;These are basically meant as tarriffs, right?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758772&quot; title=&quot;No, these are anti-trust fines. If you want to participate in the EU zone, you can&amp;#39;t have monopolistic behaviors. It might sound strange for the US, but you can&amp;#39;t simply corner a market and then claim it&amp;#39;s innovation and &amp;#39;good for the customer&amp;#39;. The EU has a LONG history of these regulations, it&amp;#39;s nothing new but the more rich a company becomes the more these fines are just the price of doing business. Instead, here&amp;#39;s a wild take. Why don&amp;#39;t they just follow the regulations and continue to make…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758978&quot; title=&quot;Google made Android open source for free and you can even see this on this on HN as everyone glazes GrapheneOS. Without Android there would not be an entire ecosystem of software. Google even complied with a previous rulings about search engine choice and browser choice. In fact Android has always allowed you to set those things. As usual Europe can&amp;#39;t innovate so just taxes people out of their market entirely. Why would anyone want to locate their business in Europe after reading a headline…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the EU is overly dependent on US cloud and AI services, others point out that the US has already weaponized this dependency, prompting European governments to develop &amp;#34;escape hatches&amp;#34; and domestic alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48759097&quot; title=&quot;I think rather, that it is the EU who cannot live without US cloud services and AI-services. Imagine if the US, behind closed doors of course, threatened to cut off all cloud services. Huge parts of the public and private sector could collapse.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48759601&quot; title=&quot;This already happened. The US government cut off a judge at the international criminal court from her Office365 account because she was pressing a war crimes case against Benjamin Netanyahu. It&amp;#39;s the reason why in the last year you&amp;#39;ve seen multiple European governments very quickly build an escape hatch against US tech. We all expect that you&amp;#39;ll use our dependency on US services as a weapon, you&amp;#39;ve already done so, so we&amp;#39;re phasing you out. It&amp;#39;ll take decades to repair the lost trust in US…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48759115&quot; title=&quot;We would build our own alternatives. Russia is a much smaller market (120 million people) and they have their own tech companies.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48759207&quot; title=&quot;It would hurt the EU more than it would hurt us and they&amp;#39;re in denial about it.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics of the ruling argue that Google’s open-source contributions are undervalued, while proponents maintain that companies must respect local regulations if they wish to access the essential EU market &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48759009&quot; title=&quot;As he just found out, that&amp;#39;s exactly what the EU can do. And as he&amp;#39;s about to find out, the EU is way too important a market for the American economy to ignore or pull out of. Play on your neighbour&amp;#39;s yard, obey their rules.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758689&quot; title=&quot;“Android provides more choice for everyone and supports thousands of businesses. This judgment fails to recognize our significant investment to ensure Android remains open, interoperable and free,” a Google spokesperson told CNBC. Sure. Which is why alternative stores like F-Droid are under threat now. https://keepandroidopen.org/&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758772&quot; title=&quot;No, these are anti-trust fines. If you want to participate in the EU zone, you can&amp;#39;t have monopolistic behaviors. It might sound strange for the US, but you can&amp;#39;t simply corner a market and then claim it&amp;#39;s innovation and &amp;#39;good for the customer&amp;#39;. The EU has a LONG history of these regulations, it&amp;#39;s nothing new but the more rich a company becomes the more these fines are just the price of doing business. Instead, here&amp;#39;s a wild take. Why don&amp;#39;t they just follow the regulations and continue to make…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48758978&quot; title=&quot;Google made Android open source for free and you can even see this on this on HN as everyone glazes GrapheneOS. Without Android there would not be an entire ecosystem of software. Google even complied with a previous rulings about search engine choice and browser choice. In fact Android has always allowed you to set those things. As usual Europe can&amp;#39;t innovate so just taxes people out of their market entirely. Why would anyone want to locate their business in Europe after reading a headline…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/FractalFir/crustc&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;crustc: entirety of `rustc`, translated to C&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48768464&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;386 points · 89 comments · by Philpax&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The `crustc` project has successfully translated the entire `rustc` compiler into 46 million lines of C code using a new toolchain called `cilly`. This allows Rust to be compiled on obscure or legacy hardware that supports C but lacks LLVM or GCC Rust support. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/FractalFir/crustc&quot; title=&quot;GitHub - FractalFir/crustc: Entirety of `rustc`, translated to C.    Entirety of `rustc`, translated to C. . Contribute to FractalFir/crustc development by creating an account on GitHub.    [Skip to content](#start-of-content)    ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [Sign in](/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FFractalFir%2Fcrustc)    Appearance settings    * Platform      + AI CODE CREATION      - [GitHub CopilotWrite better code with AI](https://github.com/features/copilot)      - [GitHub Copilot…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The project is praised for its potential to bring Rust to obscure hardware lacking LLVM support and for providing a new path for bootstrapping the compiler &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48768888&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; For the past 3 years, I have been working on compiling Rust to C. .. This is, by my count, the 14th attempt: cilly Gotta respect the dedication to a niche interest. &amp;gt; The primary goal of this is support for old/obscure hardware with no LLVM/GCC support. I remember reading about the bootstrapping question, how it typically requires a Rust compiler to build the Rust compiler from source. https://bootstrapping.miraheze.org/wiki/Bootstrapping_Specif... Oh, but I see there&amp;#39;s a C++ implementation…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48769325&quot; title=&quot;Guix uses mrustc for bootstrapping Rust, as required for compiler packages; it&amp;#39;s a really impressive project and has worked well in that role for some time. This new project is interesting for other reasons though, because mrustc is targeted at the de fact &amp;#39;subset&amp;#39; of Rust in use by rustc at any given time. This looks like it could have broader applications, like compiling Rust programs for platforms not supported by LLVM. If it really targets ANSI C (C89 or so), that&amp;#39;s potentially many more…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant social benefit is that lowering Rust to C allows a wider pool of engineers to debug portability and ABI issues using familiar C toolchains &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48770655&quot; title=&quot;The most interesting part of this to me is not “Rust to C” by itself, but the fact that it widens the pool of people who can help debug portability problems. There are relatively few people who understand Rust’s compiler internals, LLVM backends, and obscure target support deeply. But there are many engineers who understand C compilers, ABIs, linkers, makefiles, cross-compilation, old operating systems, and weird platform-specific compiler behavior. If Rust can be lowered into target-specific…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, commenters suggested using the transpiler for Diverse Double-Compiling to verify the official compiler&amp;#39;s integrity against backdoors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48768889&quot; title=&quot;Have you tried Diverse Double-Compiling (DDC) to test if the official rust compiler has a backdoor? Use crustc to compile the rust source code, producing a new compiler. Then use this new compiler and the official rustc binary, both with deterministic flags, to compile the rust source code again. The two outputs should match bit for bit.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48769492&quot; title=&quot;This reminds me of https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~rdriley/487/papers/Thompson_1984_Ref...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-07-01</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-07-01</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.playstation.com/2026/07/01/physical-disc-production-ending-in-january-2028-for-new-games-releasing-on-playstation-consoles/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Physical disc production ending in Jan 2028 for new games on PlayStation&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.playstation.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48745456&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;784 points · 793 comments · by Tiberium&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sony Interactive Entertainment will discontinue physical disc production for all new PlayStation games starting in January 2028. Moving forward, new titles will be released exclusively in digital formats to align with shifting consumer preferences, though the change will not affect games released prior to that date. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.playstation.com/2026/07/01/physical-disc-production-ending-in-january-2028-for-new-games-releasing-on-playstation-consoles/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Physical disc production ending in January 2028 for new games releasing on PlayStation consoles    URL Source: https://blog.playstation.com/2026/07/01/physical-disc-production-ending-in-january-2028-for-new-games-releasing-on-playstation-consoles/    Published Time: 2026-07-01T04:58:03-07:00    Markdown Content:  [Skip to content](https://blog.playstation.com/2026/07/01/physical-disc-production-ending-in-january-2028-for-new-games-releasing-on-playstation-consoles/#primary)    [![Image 2:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The end of physical disc production for PlayStation has sparked concerns that gaming is entering a &amp;#34;dark age&amp;#34; where digital-only ecosystems prevent true ownership and long-term preservation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48750125&quot; title=&quot;Between DRM, DLC, mandatory connectivity and the end of physical media, the future will look back on this era as the &amp;#39;dark age&amp;#39; of digital gaming history. Maintaining activation servers, cloud storage and digital delivery costs money. If it doesn&amp;#39;t disappear when the title reaches EOL, it certainly does when the company is gone or shifts business models. And draconian copyright laws create legal jeopardy around orphaned games from long-dead companies while the DMCA makes it illegal to remove…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48745812&quot; title=&quot;Discs are less convenient so people have slowly moved to digital sales. This worked even better for console manufacturers, cheaper to drop that disc reader, and the second hand market is effectively dead which increases new game sales. The side-effect most people didn&amp;#39;t consider is that you never really own a digital copy. And the most relevant part is that you cannot transfer/sell a digital copy. For everything else around ownership I know I can count on Sony to still screw it up even with…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Commentators highlight the irony of this move coinciding with Sony&amp;#39;s removal of &amp;#34;purchased&amp;#34; digital movies from user libraries and the closure of legacy storefronts, reinforcing the reality that digital content is effectively rented rather than owned &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48751390&quot; title=&quot;Great buildup on Sony&amp;#39;s side to gain trust in this move in the gaming community ahead of this announcement when just this week they again pulled hundreds of &amp;#39;purchased&amp;#39; movies from customer&amp;#39;s libraries without refund, reminding everyone that digital content is rented, not owned. https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/sony-erases-digital-...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://wangcong.org/2026-06-30-why-i-stopped-arguing-with-people.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Most arguments are about ego, not ideas&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (wangcong.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48746445&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;721 points · 558 comments · by backlit4034&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A software engineer explains why he stopped arguing for technical correctness, concluding that most disagreements are ego-driven battles rather than rational debates. He now prioritizes personal growth and building on unique insights over trying to change others, who typically only learn through consequences or when explicitly asking for help. &lt;a href=&quot;https://wangcong.org/2026-06-30-why-i-stopped-arguing-with-people.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Why I Stopped Arguing With People    URL Source: https://wangcong.org/2026-06-30-why-i-stopped-arguing-with-people.html    Published Time: 2026-06-30T20:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  I am a software engineer, and I used to enjoy arguing with people for technical correctness. Code reviews, design meetings, mailing-list threads, dinner tables. If someone was wrong, I wanted them to know it, and I wanted them to know exactly _why_. I collected counterarguments the way I collected patches. I…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely agree that most arguments are driven by ego and a desire to &amp;#34;win&amp;#34; rather than a search for truth, suggesting that the most productive path is often to walk away or prioritize kindness over being right &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48746587&quot; title=&quot;They never mention they could’ve been wrong. The author assumes they’re always right, but that trying to convince others and argue them to their right side is not valuable. How about: maybe I’m wrong and I didn’t let their ideas influence me. How about: even when I think I’m right, it will be better to calmly kindly discuss, listening as much as talking, not debating or arguing or speaking over them, but attempting to see new perspectives. I could well be wrong about this :)&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48746681&quot; title=&quot;The point being made is to pick your battles. The author’s point is that, even if you are correct 100% of the time, fighting every battle is toxic to yourself and everyone around you. They are saying to look past the fact that you might be right and consider that it’s not worth the effort anyway. Now, I will attempt to put down my phone and not respond to any replies I get to the contrary. Sweating intensifies…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48746824&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been reading the writings of stoic philosophers each morning and journaling about what I read and I think this fits in well with that philosophy. We&amp;#39;re all here on Earth to enrich ourselves (and I don&amp;#39;t mean materially) and those around us. Arguing with strangers online is antithetical to that premise. You don&amp;#39;t better yourself by engaging in pointless squabbling, and you don&amp;#39;t enrich the other person or those around you by doing so. They probably won&amp;#39;t change their mind, and you&amp;#39;re…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that you cannot reason someone out of a position they didn&amp;#39;t reason themselves into &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48746919&quot; title=&quot;Here&amp;#39;s a simple idea: You can&amp;#39;t reason someone out of a position they didn&amp;#39;t reason themselves into. And three interpretations to consider: 0: The default: That person is irrationally attached to being wrong. Best to walk away, argumentation will be futile, and I have a life to lead. 1: Whoa! Sometimes that person is me. 2: If they didn&amp;#39;t reason themselves into it, how did they get into it? What if their position represents their values , not some perfectly architected strategy for maximizing…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others provide personal anecdotes of changing their minds on major topics like religion or climate change through online debate &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48747013&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; You can&amp;#39;t reason someone out of a position they didn&amp;#39;t reason themselves into. this is a pithy think to say but its really not true, and every person that has lost their religion and been convinced by rational argument is a counter example.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48746903&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; What is the goal when you start arguing with someone online? Is that goal achievable? For me the goal is twofold.  I&amp;#39;m arguing for the people reading the comment chain, not necessarily the commenter&amp;#39;s sake.  I know it&amp;#39;s nearly impossible to convince someone you are arguing with.  But also I do try and have an open mind.  It&amp;#39;s not common that I change my position, but it does happen. For example, I was once a climate change denier.  It was debating with people online which caused me to reflect…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a notable sense of loss regarding the decline of good-faith public discourse, with some users now adopting tiered &amp;#34;interaction profiles&amp;#34; to protect relationships from the toxicity of constant disagreement &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48746708&quot; title=&quot;One of the most cancerous developments of our generation is a bunch of people isolating themselves from everyone else, and having their perfect unchallenged audience captured views spread far and wide. On a more personal level, the reason people are frustrated about arguing is because they can’t fully articulate their reasons. They don’t realize it themselves. The older you get and the more practiced you get at arguing, the less contentious it becomes, as you can simply say what underpins what…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48750603&quot; title=&quot;This article really resonates with me. During college and graduate school studying philosophy, picking apart someone&amp;#39;s argument and pointing out the esoteric and nuanced ways which made it wrong was celebrated. The general attitude in my cohort was: &amp;#39;I want to be wrong, because when I realize I&amp;#39;m wrong, I&amp;#39;ve become smarter.&amp;#39; This was probably the most intellectually fulfilling period of my life. (Note here: some of the greatest moments were realizing when I was wrong in my criticism of an…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.quantamagazine.org/for-the-first-time-a-cell-built-from-scratch-grows-and-divides-20260701/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;For first time, a cell built from scratch grows and divides&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (quantamagazine.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48747304&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;950 points · 301 comments · by defrost&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scientists have successfully engineered a synthetic &amp;#34;Spudcell&amp;#34; from scratch that is capable of growing and dividing, marking a major milestone in the effort to build artificial life. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.quantamagazine.org/for-the-first-time-a-cell-built-from-scratch-grows-and-divides-20260701/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;biotic.org&amp;amp;#x2F;research&amp;amp;#x2F;spudcell&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;biotic.org&amp;amp;#x2F;research&amp;amp;#x2F;spudcell&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.science.org&amp;amp;#x2F;content&amp;amp;#x2F;article&amp;amp;#x2F;lab-created-spudcell-marks-major-step-toward-building-life-scratch&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.science.org&amp;amp;#x2F;content&amp;amp;#x2F;article&amp;amp;#x2F;lab-created-spudcell...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The creation of &amp;#34;SpudCells&amp;#34; has sparked significant controversy regarding the lead researcher&amp;#39;s decision to bypass traditional peer review by sending a 190-page manuscript to journalists before uploading it to a preprint server &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48749458&quot; title=&quot;Science News has a more balanced take, with additional quotes from peers. &amp;gt; Some have also grumbled about Adamala’s efforts to draw attention to the work, which she says was rejected by Cell after one reviewer said SpudCells were not real biology. She then sent the 190-page manuscript to journalists, under embargo, even before she had uploaded it to the preprint server bioRxiv, where her colleagues could read and assess it. She says her group will submit it to a new journal soon. “It’s an…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48750800&quot; title=&quot;Rejections from journals are not uncommon and sometimes it&amp;#39;s for somewhat questionable reasons. Uploading the manuscript to a preprint server and/or submitting to another journal, which Adamala is doing/planning to do, is the normal response. Sending it to journalists beforehand is what I consider an overreaction.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters view this as a necessary workaround against a flawed academic system that often rejects novel ideas for arbitrary reasons &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48750318&quot; title=&quot;In fairness, it&amp;#39;s a workaround against something that likely should not have happened. Problems require creative (aka unusual) solutions.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48753431&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s an over reaction if you have a decade to argue with morons. I&amp;#39;ve had papers sit in peer review for two years, get rejected, then when they are finally published the other editors of the journal that rejected them came crawling in asking for the next paper in the series and promising the front page. Worse they ran a news story about our paper _in the journal that rejected it_ saying how groundbreaking it was. The only people who think peer review still works are people who have never used…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that circumventing standard scientific assessment is an unprofessional overreaction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48749892&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; “It’s an unusual way of doing things,” says Kerstin Göpfrich, a synthetic biologist at Heidelberg University. That&amp;#39;s being kind; it&amp;#39;s a complete overreaction, simply put.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48750800&quot; title=&quot;Rejections from journals are not uncommon and sometimes it&amp;#39;s for somewhat questionable reasons. Uploading the manuscript to a preprint server and/or submitting to another journal, which Adamala is doing/planning to do, is the normal response. Sending it to journalists beforehand is what I consider an overreaction.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond the procedural debate, the achievement is hailed as a &amp;#34;holy grail&amp;#34; that could redefine our understanding of life and the universe &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48747983&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; “It’s a big step forward to this holy grail of making a living thing out of dead components,” said Sijbren Otto, a systems chemist at the Stratingh Institute for Chemistry in the Netherlands who was not involved in the work. That is the holy grail? I get that the goal is to &amp;#39;grow&amp;#39; biofuels, plastic, fertilizer, drugs, or whatever else we can imagine. But is that worth the many apocalyptic sci-fi outcomes we can imagine?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48749237&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; That is the holy grail? At one end we&amp;#39;re creating artificial life , the other we are creating artificial intelligence . We&amp;#39;re coming at everything we as the human race have known for millennia from both ends, simultaneously. We&amp;#39;re recreating that, from scratch. That is absolutely fucking wild. Ironically this &amp;#39;holy&amp;#39; grail will end up being the thing that finally puts religious creation myths in their place (i.e. as bullshit) since we will be able to answer with 100% certainty that we are not…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, though it also prompts concerns about potential apocalyptic outcomes and the philosophical boundaries of what constitutes &amp;#34;real&amp;#34; biology &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48747983&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; “It’s a big step forward to this holy grail of making a living thing out of dead components,” said Sijbren Otto, a systems chemist at the Stratingh Institute for Chemistry in the Netherlands who was not involved in the work. That is the holy grail? I get that the goal is to &amp;#39;grow&amp;#39; biofuels, plastic, fertilizer, drugs, or whatever else we can imagine. But is that worth the many apocalyptic sci-fi outcomes we can imagine?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48749920&quot; title=&quot;Exoplanets also aren&amp;#39;t planets. Some things just seem to have definitions with a history that get applied to new discoveries that don&amp;#39;t fall within the definition. Distinguishing random rocks in space from planets was done by requiring planets to orbit around the sun, and so planets elsewhere cannot be called planets no matter that it&amp;#39;s 1:1 the same thing. Biology probably has a similar history of trying to draw a line somewhere between what was created and what evolved to be part of the…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48748342&quot; title=&quot;Yes, mechanically constructing life would be absolutely stupendous for science. The real tragedy of modern sci-fi is that everyone read the books and decided it was reality. “Penicillin?! A poison from fungus that kills living cells?! Haven’t you played the sci fi game The Last of Us?” Stories are stories, man. Story-logic is biased towards interesting tales. And “discovery from the natural world turned to human aims with great results” is uninteresting because we do amazing things these days.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pcgamer.com/gaming-industry/open-source-game-engine-godot-will-no-longer-accept-ai-authored-code-contributions-we-cant-trust-heavy-users-of-ai-to-understand-their-code-enough-to-fix-it/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Godot will no longer accept AI-authored code contributions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (pcgamer.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48743472&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;558 points · 402 comments · by pjmlp&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Godot Foundation is banning AI-authored code and text contributions to its open-source game engine, citing a &amp;#34;demoralizing&amp;#34; influx of low-effort &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; that burdens human maintainers. The new policy requires human accountability for all submissions to ensure contributors can understand and fix the code they provide. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pcgamer.com/gaming-industry/open-source-game-engine-godot-will-no-longer-accept-ai-authored-code-contributions-we-cant-trust-heavy-users-of-ai-to-understand-their-code-enough-to-fix-it/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Open source game engine Godot will no longer accept AI-authored code contributions: &amp;#39;We can&amp;#39;t trust heavy users of AI to understand their code enough to fix it&amp;#39;    URL Source: https://www.pcgamer.com/gaming-industry/open-source-game-engine-godot-will-no-longer-accept-ai-authored-code-contributions-we-cant-trust-heavy-users-of-ai-to-understand-their-code-enough-to-fix-it/    Published Time: 2026-06-30T17:36:09+00:00    Markdown Content:  [Skip to main…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Godot&amp;#39;s ban on AI-authored code is seen by some as a necessary defense against a &amp;#34;denial-of-service attack&amp;#34; of low-quality, unverified &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; that overwhelms maintainers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48743798&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a fair policy. Getting those verbose, AI-authored walls of text is very annoying, especially when you&amp;#39;re expected to thoroughly review it. It&amp;#39;s like a denial-of-service attack on the human mind. I can only imagine how frustrating this can get in open projects that get a lot of contributions. However, I don&amp;#39;t think this will discourage AI-based coding at all. In fact, I see two potential outcomes of these policies: - Negative : Submitters just add stylistic markers to make their accounts…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48744617&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I personally wouldn&amp;#39;t care if it was AI-generated or not, as long as the content fit the latter category. The problem is that a lot of AI contributions are lazily produced without review. Those that have been properly reviewed for correctness (tested to ensure actually working with no obvious undesirable side effects, tweaked where needed to be readable and understandable, fitting the other guidelines of the project, etc) will be indiscernible from human-only contributions, but there are a…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While critics argue the policy is difficult to enforce and may hamper Godot&amp;#39;s long-term velocity against AI-native competitors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48745634&quot; title=&quot;A point of wild speculation. This is likely to be the slow decline of Godot. As someone with 2 years of Godot experience (which seems like a lot given their lifespan), the underlying infra isn&amp;#39;t strong enough to ward off the many competitors that will embrace AI at the heart of the engine. Ironically, the best engine right now for AI-assisted coding is Godot! It has plain text scene files, and Opus does a half decent design - screenshot - iterative flow to get things off the ground before…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48744186&quot; title=&quot;And how will this be enforced ?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48744343&quot; title=&quot;How they enforce it in every other project with the same policy, if the reviewer/maintainer suspects the pr is ai slope he closes it. That&amp;#39;s it, it works fantastically well, I do the same even in my job&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest the ban is less about the tool used and more about rejecting the lazily produced, verbose contributions that AI often facilitates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48743798&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a fair policy. Getting those verbose, AI-authored walls of text is very annoying, especially when you&amp;#39;re expected to thoroughly review it. It&amp;#39;s like a denial-of-service attack on the human mind. I can only imagine how frustrating this can get in open projects that get a lot of contributions. However, I don&amp;#39;t think this will discourage AI-based coding at all. In fact, I see two potential outcomes of these policies: - Negative : Submitters just add stylistic markers to make their accounts…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48744617&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I personally wouldn&amp;#39;t care if it was AI-generated or not, as long as the content fit the latter category. The problem is that a lot of AI contributions are lazily produced without review. Those that have been properly reviewed for correctness (tested to ensure actually working with no obvious undesirable side effects, tweaked where needed to be readable and understandable, fitting the other guidelines of the project, etc) will be indiscernible from human-only contributions, but there are a…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48744640&quot; title=&quot;Wouldn&amp;#39;t it make much more sense to just reject _low_ quality PR&amp;#39;s? On an unrelated note, I lost all respect and eagerness to try it out after the drama.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Some developers report an &amp;#34;AI hangover,&amp;#34; noting that while tools provide an initial speed boost, they often introduce subtle inconsistencies and a unique form of mental fatigue &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48744495&quot; title=&quot;Interesting that on one hand the valuation of these AI providers is based on the assumption that all code (and everything else producing digital artefacts) will be written using AI in the near future, on the other hand almost all popular open source projects fight to keep AI contributions out. Hard to reconcile. Personally I&amp;#39;m also experiencing a bit of AI hangover after using it a lot in my own open-source projects. I find it&amp;#39;s a bit like taking drugs (not that I have much experience with…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://reclaimthenet.org/sony-deletes-551-studiocanal-movies-playstation-owners-paid-for&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sony Deletes 551 Movies PlayStation Owners Paid For&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (reclaimthenet.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48747389&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;630 points · 293 comments · by bilsbie&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sony is removing 551 previously purchased StudioCanal movies and TV shows from PlayStation Store libraries on September 1 due to expiring licensing agreements, with no current plans to offer refunds to affected customers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://reclaimthenet.org/sony-deletes-551-studiocanal-movies-playstation-owners-paid-for&quot; title=&quot;Title: Sony Deletes 551 StudioCanal Movies PlayStation Owners Paid For    URL Source: https://reclaimthenet.org/sony-deletes-551-studiocanal-movies-playstation-owners-paid-for    Published Time: 2026-06-29T17:25:38+00:00    Markdown Content:  Ownership is slowly moving onto servers a few companies control, and the storefront hasn’t admitted it yet.    Sony plans to wipe 551 movies and TV shows from the PlayStation Store libraries of customers who paid full price for them. The deletion is coming on…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The removal of purchased movies has sparked calls for legislation to treat digital files as physical property, preventing companies from using EULAs to redefine sales as mere licenses &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48747939&quot; title=&quot;It should be illegal to have others purchase what you as a company only licensed and therefore aren’t legally allowed to sell.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48749022&quot; title=&quot;We need some kind of modern equivalent to the old proposed Digital Media Consumer&amp;#39;s Rights Act but which protects people&amp;#39;s rights to digital media they buy. These should never be sold and then taken away with no compensation like this. We need a law that forces companies to treat digital files the same as a physical purchase. They can&amp;#39;t take it away and have to allow people to resell and loan out as well. And in cases of online games where you can buy something, and then later they can ban you…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users advocate for piracy as a DRM-free alternative, others point to the &amp;#34;Stop Killing Games&amp;#34; movement as a potential path toward legal protections in major markets like the EU &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48748909&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve heard there&amp;#39;s a service called PirateBay that offers movies free of DRM. Maybe people considering being Sony customers in the future should give it a try.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48750078&quot; title=&quot;Not sure if you know this, but this is literally the Stop Killing Games movement. Despite the recent apparent setback as reported in the news, the organisers are in talks with EU MPs that are writing sweeping legislation to address this sort of thing across all digital mediums. You only need legislation like this to hold in one major market to make a big difference.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48749462&quot; title=&quot;The Pirate Bay is considered one of the worst pirate sites now. Of course, if you can find what you want, then you can, but any piracy community will recommend against it due to nonexistent moderation (eg. against viruses), poor navigation, and lack of uploads due to them not issuing new uploader accounts for several years now.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics of such regulation argue it could increase development costs and stifle investment, though proponents clarify that the goal is often to allow users to run code independently rather than forcing companies to open-source proprietary engines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48751512&quot; title=&quot;I think this is going to have unintended consequences if it goes through: funding game development is a very very high risk investment. Adding this type of regulation adds further cost and complication, which makes it an even less attractive investment. Which will result in less monetary and creative risk taken. Even just open sourcing part of project is expensive. Legal and technical.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48752725&quot; title=&quot;I thought this was more &amp;#39;let people run the code themselves if they can figure it out&amp;#39; not &amp;#39;open sourcing&amp;#39;. There&amp;#39;s no appetite to force a company that reuses and improves their game engine on every new title to open source it, even an older version.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Historical precedents, such as Sony’s removal of the &amp;#34;OtherOS&amp;#34; feature on the PS3, serve as a reminder for many of the long-standing risks associated with centralized digital ecosystems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48748418&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s funny is that Sony has done this before![0] I&amp;#39;ve had a personal boycott against Sony products due to this. &amp;#39;The feature was controversially removed by Sony since system firmware update 3.21, released on April 1, 2010.[2] A class action lawsuit was filed against Sony on behalf of users, but was dismissed with prejudice in 2011 by a federal judge. The judge stated: &amp;#39;As a legal matter, ... plaintiffs have failed to allege facts or articulate a theory on which Sony may be held liable.&amp;#39;[3]…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48748616&quot; title=&quot;Yep. I had tons of Sony games across the first three Playstation consoles. I was a grad student with a PS3 at the time and I actually used Yellow Dog Linux on it as a computer to write papers when my laptop broke. Then the update came and I chose to ignore it, but that meant I couldn&amp;#39;t play online games. Soon new games required a firmware update (still remember putting in the Dark Souls disc and being stunned I wasn&amp;#39;t allowed to play it!). And with games it&amp;#39;s just getting worse (Sony announced…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mynintendonews.com/2026/06/26/nintendo-has-raised-its-employees-base-salary-by-10/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Nintendo has raised its employees base salary by 10%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mynintendonews.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48745113&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;560 points · 350 comments · by _tk_&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nintendo has increased the base salary for its employees by 10% while also investing 121 billion yen into a new research and development facility. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mynintendonews.com/2026/06/26/nintendo-has-raised-its-employees-base-salary-by-10/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Nintendo has raised its employees base salary by 10%    URL Source: https://mynintendonews.com/2026/06/26/nintendo-has-raised-its-employees-base-salary-by-10/    Published Time: 2026-06-26T13:46:43+00:00    Markdown Content:  ## 18 thoughts on “Nintendo has raised its employees base salary by 10%”    1.   ![Image 1](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/dd16f469be301a306ef21056a286d37113f571692ca1fd16c0e2e3fb192c2701?s=50&amp;amp;d=retro)    Employee raises and building new buildings. Take notes Xbox and…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nintendo&amp;#39;s 10% base salary increase highlights the stark contrast between Japan&amp;#39;s historically stagnant cost of living and the &amp;#34;insanely inflated&amp;#34; tech wages of the US &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48746320&quot; title=&quot;I recently heard that a trip to Popeye&amp;#39;s for a family of 3 recently cost $68 in Florida. In Japan, there&amp;#39;s a big issue when a snack raises its price 2 cents (3 yen - source: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/japanese-snack-company-apolog... ) The country for better or worse seems to be frozen in time - salaries have not caught up with the heady levels of SV (or even Europe) but neither have rents or prices for common goods. This is not a judgment either way - but it does make Japanese exports a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48746886&quot; title=&quot;US tech wages are insanely inflated compared to, well, everywhere.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users celebrate the move as a reward for good results, others note that Nintendo of America famously underpays and struggles to attract talent in high-cost areas like Redmond &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48746318&quot; title=&quot;This does not apply to Nintendo of America, which famously does underpay in the Redmond, WA area and well.. I hear has trouble truly attracting talent in the first place.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48745857&quot; title=&quot;Always a great thing to hear. Well paid employees, good results, and I&amp;#39;m definitely loving their Switch 2 releases already.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also features a debate over global inflation and housing affordability, with one user sharing a notable anecdote about bypassing traditional building codes to construct a $60k home &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48747443&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s very cool. They don&amp;#39;t say whether or not it&amp;#39;s retroactive, though (I&amp;#39;ll bet not). I am astounded at some of the starting salaries, these days. Kids, right out of school, make more than I ever did, at the peak of my career. And can&amp;#39;t afford a house. My father never made more than about $40K, but had a house in Potomac, two cars, and a stay-at-home wife. Money ain&amp;#39;t what it used to be.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48747487&quot; title=&quot;I still can&amp;#39;t afford a house.  So I built one.  It was cheap as hell even post covid, I think it took about $60k.  I did not submit building plans, I did not get it code inspected, and I did not have any trades licenses. There is an actually &amp;#39;professional&amp;#39; built house next to me, following the gazillion licensing laws and planning nonsense, it is much older, run down, and barely larger but cost 5x the price. The reason why you can&amp;#39;t have a house isn&amp;#39;t that you don&amp;#39;t make enough to build one,…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://zcode.z.ai/en&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ZCode – Harness for GLM-5.2&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (zcode.z.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48753715&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;508 points · 354 comments · by chvid&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ZCode 3.0 is an AI-powered coding harness optimized for GLM-5.2, designed to streamline planning, coding, and deployment through multi-agent collaboration. The platform features deep tool integration, long-running task management via &amp;#34;Goals,&amp;#34; and remote bot control through messaging apps like WeChat and Telegram. &lt;a href=&quot;https://zcode.z.ai/en&quot; title=&quot;Title: ZCode - Simple, Fast, Vibe‑Ready | Official Harness for GLM-5.2    URL Source: https://zcode.z.ai/en    Markdown Content:  [](https://zcode.z.ai/en)    Log in    [](https://zcode.z.ai/en)    [Docs](https://zcode.z.ai/en/docs)[Changelog](https://zcode.z.ai/en/changelog)    Community    [中文](https://zcode.z.ai/cn)Log in    [🎉ZCode 3.0: GLM-5.2 optimized, better multi-agent collaboration](https://zcode.z.ai/en/changelog)    # Simple, Fast, Vibe‑Ready !    ZCode combines the best AI agents with your existing…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the security risks of using a closed-source Chinese agent system, with users warning that legal obligations to state intelligence make spying on corporate workstations a near certainty &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48752737&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t find a closed-source Chinese agent system trustworthy. It is essentially a black box with full user permissions, meaning you are just handing over your entire system to a Chinese-owned server. With OpenCode and its GLM provider, at least I can monitor which files were read, which were edited, and what commands were executed. Not to mention that Chinese national security laws legally obligate companies to cooperate with state intelligence and counter-espionage efforts [0]. If you have…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that US-based competitors are equally untrustworthy and advocate for open-source alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48752757&quot; title=&quot;I agree. I don&amp;#39;t find the US competitors trustworthy either. I think open source is the way here.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48752999&quot; title=&quot;Thank you. It doesn&amp;#39;t make sense to me how much people trust our companies so much more than Chinese ones for no reason. This country has an abysmal track record when it comes to respecting its citizen&amp;#39;s rights or privacy. Propaganda working as intended I suppose.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others emphasize that China’s specific track record on privacy is uniquely concerning &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48753040&quot; title=&quot;If you think the US has an &amp;#39;abysmal&amp;#39; track record on this, what words would you use to describe China&amp;#39;s track record?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. To mitigate these risks, developers suggest running such tools in headless VMs or using CLI-based agents that allow for better monitoring and permission control &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48752442&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t even know what I would do with a desktop app. I&amp;#39;m running these things in headless VMs, so I can run them with `--dangerously-skip-permissions` or whatever. I don&amp;#39;t trust them, even without that flag, on my desktop/laptop.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48753282&quot; title=&quot;But, it&amp;#39;s still running on my desktop/laptop. I don&amp;#39;t trust them to run on my machine. But, I guess I could run one VM with a desktop to contain the desktop app. Or, just keep using CLI agents.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48752110&quot; title=&quot;Z.ai documents integrations with nearly all the popular CLI-based agents: https://docs.z.ai/devpack/tool/others If you&amp;#39;re already used to your TUI coding agent, you don&amp;#39;t need the desktop agent. Although it is nice that it is there for folks who prefer the Codex App/Claude App UI approach.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/claudeai/status/2072402636813607381&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Fable 5 is Back&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48752030&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;407 points · 418 comments · by mfiguiere&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Claude announced on X that Fable 5 has returned, accompanied by a video post that has garnered millions of views. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/claudeai/status/2072402636813607381&quot; title=&quot;Claude (@claudeai) on X    Fable 5 is back. https://t.co/9RTGUCcPHy    ## Post    [Log in](/i/jf/onboarding/web?mode=login)[Sign up](/i/jf/onboarding/web?mode=signup)    ## Post    [![user avatar](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1950950107937185792/QOfEjFoJ_normal.jpg)](https://x.com/claudeai)    [Claude](https://x.com/claudeai)    [![Anthropic](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1798110641414443008/XP8gyBaY_normal.jpg)](https://twitter.com/AnthropicAI)    [@claudeai](https://x.com/claudeai)    Fable 5 is…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are expressing significant frustration with Anthropic’s restrictive safety protocols, reporting that the model now flags benign content like books on consciousness or refuses previously functional browser tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48753353&quot; title=&quot;I gave it a book on human consciousness I was writing and it flagged it. This model is hilariously bad. Anthropic has defanged this model to the point of malice. No way am I paying to use something that is basically useless.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48753568&quot; title=&quot;Today I told Sonnet (!) to use a browser MCP to enter a username and password for the project it is working on, it told me that it can&amp;#39;t do that because it violates its security protocol. This worked fine before. I love Claude, I have stuck with it even through people saying Codex is better but this is definitely getting to be the last straw. It&amp;#39;s completely absurd I am paying them $200+ per month along with pushing them when I do contracts and they can&amp;#39;t even deliver a baseline respectful…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. There is widespread confusion and annoyance regarding the new pricing structure, specifically the &amp;#34;time-limited&amp;#34; access to Fable 5 and the requirement to use additional credits once a 50% weekly usage cap is reached &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48752288&quot; title=&quot;I am only a casual Clause (Pro) user and I am confused by the messaging, maybe I&amp;#39;m missing something obvious. &amp;gt; Until July 7, you can use up to 50% of your plan&amp;#39;s weekly usage limit on Fable 5. Does this mean that being able to use Fable on my subscription is a time-limited promotion? I have a subscription, why can&amp;#39;t I just... use the model? Is it the case that going forward a subscription will only give you access to older models and newer ones will require additional payment?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48752602&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ll be using it tonight but grudgingly so. Grudgingly because after July 7th, I&amp;#39;m not going to all of a sudden, start paying API prices (and maybe that&amp;#39;s the problem) when I&amp;#39;m used to a subscription that gives me multiples in comparative value. Perhaps this is the fabled &amp;#39;token economics will come for everyone this year&amp;#39; that I&amp;#39;ve been reading about? In any case, I&amp;#39;ll use the hell out of it to extract as much as I can, then back to the trusted partners Opus 4.6 and Sonnet 4.6 (for however long…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48752169&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Until July 7, you can use up to 50% of your plan&amp;#39;s weekly usage limit on Fable 5. If you hit your limit, you can continue on Fable 5 with usage credits. Fable 5 draws down usage faster than Opus 4.8. This is what I see in my Claude Code terminal. I don&amp;#39;t feel like that 50% rule was there before?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, some skeptics argue that Anthropic’s &amp;#34;world-ending&amp;#34; doomsday messaging is overhyped and has backfired by eroding trust and triggering an unnecessary arms race &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48753768&quot; title=&quot;I think this is as good as time as any to bring up that fable/mythos weights are one mistake (malicious or not) away from being leaked to adverseries or available in a random torrent. Imagine this, fable weights are likely distributed to hundreds of datacenters with likely thousands of people directly or indirectly having partial or full access. I just don&amp;#39;t quite buy that a &amp;#39;world ending&amp;#39; fable/mythos model would be treated like this, mythos I could maybe believe that it runs inside government…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48752198&quot; title=&quot;The loss of trust in using US based model&amp;#39;s is unlikely to come back though. Anthropic with it&amp;#39;s hyped doomsday messaging, and the administration falling for it (at best), has eroded a lot of trust and has triggered an arms race of sorts.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48752694&quot; title=&quot;Amusing to see OpenAI being the &amp;#39;good guy&amp;#39; in the end&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://asahilinux.org/2026/06/progress-report-7-1/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Asahi Linux 7.1 Progress Report&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (asahilinux.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48744518&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;572 points · 239 comments · by pantalaimon&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Asahi Linux 7.1 introduces M3 series support for audio and CPU scheduling, fixes boot picker and battery management issues caused by macOS 27, and debuts custom firmware for the Apple Video Decoder. &lt;a href=&quot;https://asahilinux.org/2026/06/progress-report-7-1/&quot; title=&quot;Progress Report: Linux 7.1 - Asahi Linux    Porting Linux to Apple Silicon    [![](/img/AsahiLinux_logo.svg?d619e737)](/)    * [About](/about)  * [Community](/community)  * [Contribute](/contribute)  * [Governance](/governance)  * [Documentation](/docs)  * [GitHub](https://github.com/AsahiLinux)  * [Blog](/blog)  * [Merch](/merch)  * [Donate](/support)    /  [Blog](https://asahilinux.org/blog/)  /  [Progress Report: Linux 7.1](https://asahilinux.org/2026/06/progress-report-7-1/)    # Progress Report: Linux 7.1    *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Asahi Linux project has sparked debate over Apple’s refusal to officially support the effort, with some arguing that a small investment would yield massive brand ROI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48744781&quot; title=&quot;It is baffling to me that Apple, ostensibly a hardware company (that happens to be pursuing services revenue the way a crackhead pursues crack), ridiculously flush with cash, doesn’t throw 2 or 3 of their thousands of FTEs on this.  The goodwill/brand marketing alone is worth their comp, and it will absolutely move units as well. Linux people LOVE laptops, and Apple makes the best laptops by a parsec.  It seems like 10x ROI would be a conservative estimate.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend Apple is now a services-first company with little incentive to cater to Linux users who bypass their ecosystem &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48745639&quot; title=&quot;Food for thought: Apple’s services make more revenue than Macs and iPads combined, and they do so at a higher profit margin. There’s your answer. I don’t agree that Apple makes the best laptops by a parsec. Not anymore, many alternatives are closing the gap. This is aided by the fact that Apple hasn’t touched the MacBook Pro chassis in 5 years, making it quite dated especially with the underutilized, oversized notch and the horrendous menu bar software implementation that plagues the notch as a…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48744960&quot; title=&quot;Apple is a digital services company that happens to sell hardware. Their big money maker is their app store, and no Linux user is ever going to buy apps from the app store. They still have the Darwin kernel open,but more and more of the open core is moving to closed components, a recipe for what Google started doing to Android. Now that they&amp;#39;re no longer the hipster underdog, I don&amp;#39;t think they care much about the brand marketing. You already believe they make the best laptops by far, what more…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While users are in &amp;#34;absolute awe&amp;#34; of the technical progress made by a small team &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48744760&quot; title=&quot;I’m in absolute awe that a handful of motivated people can crack these problems&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, the project faces significant hurdles in upstreaming code to the Linux kernel due to high standards and a perceived culture of toxicity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48745250&quot; title=&quot;The founder of asahi linux famously quit due to how hard it was to upstream patches. It’s not easy to deal with linus’ project.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48745545&quot; title=&quot;I can’t see that being a bad thing considering that the kernel is mandatory software in the Linux world. You would want to have high standards for what gets added.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48746583&quot; title=&quot;You should have high standards. Torvalds often crosses that line into outright toxicity. I&amp;#39;ve written a few kernel patches that I never tried to upstream for that reason.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these challenges, proponents argue that Apple Silicon offers a more secure, sandboxed architecture for Linux than traditional Intel platforms, which often rely on secret, persistent firmware blobs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48746861&quot; title=&quot;marcan addressed this early on in the project, arguing that Intel platforms including some of those advocated for by the FSF are less open and more at risk of upstream abuse in some very significant ways. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29684585 For example intel systems (and Android) run resident supervisor code you can&amp;#39;t get rid of, and that can do remotely initiated updates you have no control over. That&amp;#39;s not so on Apple silicon. &amp;gt;In fact I&amp;#39;m much more sure about that than I would be…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.demofox.org/2026/07/01/what-to-learn-to-be-a-graphics-programmer/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What to learn to be a graphics programmer&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.demofox.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48750710&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;421 points · 241 comments · by atan2&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To become a graphics programmer, the author recommends mastering C++, linear algebra, and modern APIs like DirectX12 or Vulkan, while gaining practical experience in both CPU-side engine architecture and GPU-side rendering techniques such as path tracing and physically based rendering. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.demofox.org/2026/07/01/what-to-learn-to-be-a-graphics-programmer/&quot; title=&quot;Title: What To Learn To Be A Real Time Graphics Programmer    URL Source: https://blog.demofox.org/2026/07/01/what-to-learn-to-be-a-graphics-programmer/    Published Time: 2026-07-01T17:24:49+00:00    Markdown Content:  I get asked fairly often what people need to know to be hireable as a graphics programmer. I figured it was time to make a page to link instead of re-typing it each time.    We are in a strange time with LLMs. I think ML as it is right now won’t live up to the hype, and the pendulum will…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The graphics programming field is currently viewed with a mix of awe and caution, as the rapid pace of innovation and AI integration has significantly raised the barrier to entry compared to the era of pioneers like John Carmack &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48751655&quot; title=&quot;Today, I would not recommend anybody to go into graphics programming: I started in 2001, when NVidias first Geforce 1 (&amp;#39;the Gigatexl shadercard&amp;#39;) was first announced:  The field developed since then with so much speed and innovations, it blows my mind of. Compared to what we could do 25years ago, the tech today is just fu*ing impressive. Though, with this impressiveness comes a big &amp;#39;but&amp;#39;: The space is developing at a speed which is really really scary. Nvidia came up with AI-based effects to…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48752377&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Don’t be like me! I wasted my entire life That&amp;#39;s not the argument being made here. The field is changing. I had a good career in graphics, my life wasn&amp;#39;t wasted at all. That doesn&amp;#39;t mean a college student would have the same experience starting today.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the industry is oversaturated and grueling &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48754541&quot; title=&quot;Do you want to make games, or do 3D engine programming? If you want to make games, use an existing engine. Unreal Engine, Unity, Godot, and Bevy are good choices. You&amp;#39;ll learn the higher level issues of graphics, not how to push pixels around. The real problem is making it fun. If you want to do 3D engine programming, be aware that there are too many bad game engines. In Rust land, where I am, there are three failed renderers, one unfinished one, and the one inside the Bevy engine. Those are…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the discipline remains an exhilarating way to master low-level performance and provides a visual foundation for understanding complex mathematics &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48752068&quot; title=&quot;I really dislike people that got into a thing and then try to discourage others. “Don’t be like me! I wasted my entire life” which is bullshit from a jaded person that lost passion. Telling people to stay away from graphics programming is not how to entice tomorrow’s John Carmack. So here’s another perspective. If all you have done is web apps and Kubernetes, for example, do get into graphics programming. The feedback cycle is exhilarating, and you get to appreciate how mind boggingly fast your…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48751747&quot; title=&quot;Graphics programming has this one very, very useful aspect, exponentially more valuable today: the matrix algebra pipelines, and then the requirement to &amp;#39;think in matrix transforms&amp;#39; is a wonderful and visually engaging way to get your foundation for machine learning math.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant debate regarding the overlap between graphics and machine learning; some see matrix algebra as a shared bridge &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48751747&quot; title=&quot;Graphics programming has this one very, very useful aspect, exponentially more valuable today: the matrix algebra pipelines, and then the requirement to &amp;#39;think in matrix transforms&amp;#39; is a wonderful and visually engaging way to get your foundation for machine learning math.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48752433&quot; title=&quot;SVD, and PCA are also examples.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, while others argue the practical applications in each field are too distinct to be truly comparable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48751802&quot; title=&quot;This is like saying being a cashier prepares you for a job in high-finance because both involve arithmetic on dollars and cents. I&amp;#39;ve been in ML for ~5 years in multiple FAANGs and I have never seen a rotation matrix .&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48752168&quot; title=&quot;congrats you&amp;#39;ve found literally the only example (&amp;#39;the exception that proves the rule&amp;#39;).&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, critics note that technical mastery is often insufficient without a strong grasp of human perception and design principles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48751101&quot; title=&quot;Somewhat surprising there is no mention of basic design principles, or understanding the quirks of human perception. My brother was a production artist for some well-known computer games in the &amp;#39;90s-&amp;#39;00s, and continually complained about programmers and managers with zero visual sense, or curiosity about understanding the artists&amp;#39; side. Graphics aren&amp;#39;t my specialty, but as a musician, sound designer and producer, by far the most effective/influential audio DSP coders I&amp;#39;m aware of understand the…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://box2d.org/posts/2026/06/announcing-box3d/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Box3D, an open source 3D physics engine&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (box2d.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48745445&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;519 points · 129 comments · by makepanic&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Erin Catto has released Box3D, an open-source C17 physics engine forked from Box2D and optimized for 3D games with features like SIMD contact solvers and multi-threading. Developed to power *The Legend of California*, it offers a high-performance alternative to native game engine physics. &lt;a href=&quot;https://box2d.org/posts/2026/06/announcing-box3d/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Announcing Box3D    URL Source: https://box2d.org/posts/2026/06/announcing-box3d/    Published Time: 2026-06-30 00:00:00 +0000 UTC    Markdown Content:  I’m happy to announce the release of Box3D, an open source 3D physics engine. It is now available on GitHub.    [Box3D repository](https://github.com/erincatto/box3d)    You can think of Box3D as a fork of Box2D, extended with many features needed for 3D games. Some additions:    *   Triangle mesh collision  *   Height-field collision  *   Baked…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of Box3D has prompted reflection on the legacy of its predecessor, Box2D, which famously powered *Angry Birds* but initially lacked attribution in the game&amp;#39;s credits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48750905&quot; title=&quot;Whenever I see Box2D mentioned (the library by the same author as Box3D, obviously), I think back to this story from many years ago https://kotaku.com/this-guy-created-angry-birds-physics-and-...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48751088&quot; title=&quot;I used to work at Rovio (the creator of Angry Birds). Everyone was telling the story of a talk given by Peter Vesterbacka, the head of marketing. When it was time for questions, a man from the audience asked what physics engine the game uses. Vesterbacka gives the correct answer, Box2D, to which the person replied with another question. &amp;#39;Why isn&amp;#39;t it mentioned in the credits? And by the way, I&amp;#39;m Erin Catto, the creator of Box2D.&amp;#39; To this Vesterbacka replied &amp;#39;Come talk to me after the show&amp;#39;.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that the MIT license means authors are owed nothing beyond credit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48751840&quot; title=&quot;I find it odd how we frame fairness in regards to open source software. He licensed his software as MIT. It says anyone can you use it without owing the author anything. So how is it unfair? To be clear, I think that open source maintainers deserve much more, but I don&amp;#39;t understand why we rarely inspect the licenses as the source of the problem.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48752066&quot; title=&quot;He got his name in the credits. The question was if he is owed anything else. The contract he created says he was not. I’m simply suggesting he might need a different contract.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that companies earning hundreds of millions should feel a moral obligation to financially support the open-source developers they rely on &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48751165&quot; title=&quot;To the larger point, do you know if Rovio did support/pay Eric in any other way than that hoodie? Angry Birds generated $500M [0], supposedly. I would also not be surprised if the Rovio developers, designers, testers, etc. who worked on this game did not get a share of that $500M pie - I actually assume they didn&amp;#39;t. But still, you know. Dare I say it - what about &amp;#39;fairness&amp;#39;? :-) [0] https://gameworldobserver.com/2023/02/28/angry-birds-2-reven...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48751954&quot; title=&quot;If I made 500M$ using an Open Source library and didn’t send at least 1M$ to the author, I would be an objectively bad person.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond the ethics of licensing, commenters welcomed Box3D as a rare and necessary addition to a small field of open-source 3D physics engines that has seen little innovation for nearly two decades &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48747722&quot; title=&quot;Box2D was a foundation for a lot of interesting physics oriented indie games in my day. I wonder if the landscape is empty enough for a resurgence.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48748037&quot; title=&quot;There weren&amp;#39;t many free and open source 3D physics engines to begin with. The ancient forefathers are ODE, Bullet and Newton Dynamics (all first released in the early 2000s), then nothing(?) for nearly two decades until Jolt in 2021 and now Box3D. Any addition to this small and exclusive list is very welcome :)&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://aakash.substack.com/p/why-jet-engines-arent-made-in-china&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why jet engines aren&amp;#39;t made in China&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (aakash.substack.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48740971&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;311 points · 311 comments · by paulpauper&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;China’s struggle to produce competitive jet engines highlights the limits of its industrial policy, as the sector’s slow iteration cycles and reliance on decades of accumulated manufacturing knowledge neutralize the country’s traditional advantages in capital, scale, and rapid technology adoption. &lt;a href=&quot;https://aakash.substack.com/p/why-jet-engines-arent-made-in-china&quot; title=&quot;Why Jet Engines Aren’t “Made In China”    What China’s jet engine program tells us about the limits of industrial policy    [![The Tanzimat Diaries](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!99PE!,w_40,h_40,c_fill,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F166825b0-293b-4a4c-9bbc-89b49c0bd4ea_734x734.png)](/)    # [The Tanzimat Diaries](/)    SubscribeSign in    # Why Jet Engines Aren’t “Made In China”    ### What China’s jet engine program…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The difficulty China faces in jet engine production is attributed to the extreme challenge of replicating decades of proprietary material science and domain-specific knowledge held by Western oligopolies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48742603&quot; title=&quot;Material sciences needed for modern jet engine blades are a closely guarded secret, and thanks to not manufacturing them in china, those secrets have managed to remain not stolen. Fun story: it is not just jet engines - it is only recently that china was able to actually make indigenous ballpoint pens https://www.bbc.com/news/business-38566114&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48754673&quot; title=&quot;I work in the aviation industry. This was a good read. The article hinted at the oligopolies that exist in aviation and in practice the industry is incredibly conservative and slow to change (particularly commercial aviation). While new technology is developed all the time, the extreme regulatory oversight combined with so much of the industry relying on long-standing relationships makes it difficult for any new entrant to come into the market. There is also a lot of domain specific knowledge…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48754601&quot; title=&quot;Material engineering is the well known blocker for China, same with semiconductors. They basically have to replicate 50 years of trial and error that is well kept under lock in key in the west. China hasn’t mastered chips either yet in the same way it hasn’t mastered jet turbines: they can do cheap (high yields, low maintenance costs per hour of use), they can do high performance, they can’t do both yet at the same time.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue China’s lag is a matter of time given their success in other high-tech sectors, others contend that the industry&amp;#39;s unique market structure—requiring massive capital, regulatory oversight, and real-world user data—creates a barrier to entry that is nearly impossible to overcome quickly &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48742440&quot; title=&quot;This is a strange article. I did not find anything that is a blocker for China. China is a relative new comer to jet engines and this technology is tightly guarded by incumbents and needs time to mature. If China can master nuclear, space, chips, it seems a bit stretch to say they it is the Jer engines where they fail.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48756657&quot; title=&quot;The more parsimonious explanation is that commercial jet engine production is downstream of commercial airbody production and China&amp;#39;s currently limited by COMAC&amp;#39;s scaling woes. All the money and talent in the world can&amp;#39;t replicate real users generating real data that you can use to improve. I&amp;#39;d argue the opposite that jet engines have a market structure that&amp;#39;s uniquely terrible for traditional free market societies. There&amp;#39;s a few industries where structurally, companies can only exit the market…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48755040&quot; title=&quot;Honestly this is a good thing. I can endure buggy software but I don’t want to deal with buggy planes. Regulatory pressure is a market force and a useful one too. There’s a huge difference between ship fast and ship right - the latter one requires deep pockets and willingness to commit to ongoing risk. People always say big Pharma and aviation and such are oligopolies, and that’s bad, but they rarely see the capital intensiveness of the whole process. Some things are slow and deliberate and…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a notable disagreement regarding whether China needs to match Western performance, with some suggesting that &amp;#34;good enough&amp;#34; engines or alternative designs could suffice for their specific civilian and military needs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48756765&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It may be surprising, then, that in jet engines, China remains at least a full decade behind the West Do they need to be at the same level as the West? For civilian aircraft a decade or two behind seems like it would be good enough. For military aircraft that could be a significant disadvantage, but from what the net is telling me they have excellent air defenses so it seems unlikely someone with superior planes is going to be able to go in and bomb them into submission. And they have a lot…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48757960&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I can endure buggy software but I don’t want to deal with buggy planes A plane built for resilience against defective engine components would be very different from the airliners we fly today. I would assume more engines for redundancy, better protection against catastrophic failure, different designs to allow engines to function even if parts flew out, and so on. It’s an interesting design exercise to build from radically different expectations from the fundamental parts. Alternatively, a…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.cloudflare.com/monetization-gateway/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Monetization Gateway: Charge for any resource behind Cloudflare via x402&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.cloudflare.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48746914&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;349 points · 251 comments · by soheilpro&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudflare has announced the Monetization Gateway, a tool allowing customers to charge for web resources like APIs and datasets using the x402 protocol, which enables sub-cent stablecoin micropayments for AI agents and automated callers without requiring traditional subscriptions or account signups. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.cloudflare.com/monetization-gateway/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Announcing the Monetization Gateway: charge for any resource behind Cloudflare via x402    URL Source: https://blog.cloudflare.com/monetization-gateway/    Published Time: 2026-07-01T14:00+01:00    Markdown Content:  ## Announcing the Monetization Gateway: charge for any resource behind Cloudflare via x402    2026-07-01    7 min read    ![Image 1](https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/qPuShvhz5HUDcJS2agaXn/be302f6d4f4e511a51378f597d0b21c0/BLOG-3342-hero.png)    Today, we are announcing the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The introduction of x402 microtransactions on Cloudflare is seen by some as a &amp;#34;dream&amp;#34; for frictionless content access and autonomous AI agents &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48753301&quot; title=&quot;This is the dream of microtransactions and agents-paying-for-access that so many people have always wanted. It was never going to be implemented on existing payment rails so it would have to be something like this. I can&amp;#39;t wait to see it in play somewhere because I am increasingly annoyed that I have to own API keys on various platforms etc. etc. I just want my agent to make decisions and spend a limited amount of money (this is on me to cover) just like a human agent can. If we get the other…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48754992&quot; title=&quot;Conversely this has the potential to unlock the internet. How often have you clicked a paywalled link on HN and moved on because you don&amp;#39;t want to go through the hassle and pay $20 to read an article? If you could be frictionlessly billed 10c to read the article instead, wouldn&amp;#39;t you be more willing? I&amp;#39;m actually OK with paying a fair price for the content I consume, I just don&amp;#39;t want to be paying hundreds of subscriptions for websites that I might only visit twice a year.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, though others fear it will create a &amp;#34;nightmare&amp;#34; of digital exclusion for those unable to pay &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48754948&quot; title=&quot;A dream for some, a nightmare for others. People locked out from much of the Internet because they don&amp;#39;t have enough money. Of course, the prices would usually be set at whatever maximises revenue, just check out scientific journal publishing.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant skepticism exists regarding its practical implementation, specifically the legal and tax complexities of invoicing thousands of tiny transactions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48750817&quot; title=&quot;With payments the complexity is not only in accepting a payment, but largely in doing so legally. Someone makes a request to my company&amp;#39;s paid service, I return 402 and get a stable coin back. Who do I invoice for this revenue? What value added tax do I apply to the invoice? If someone makes 10k paid requests within one month, do I have means of generating one invoice for them for all the usage, or is every request treated separately and results in 10k invoices?  Will CloudFlare handle this for…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48751110&quot; title=&quot;Who do you invoice if, for example, you own a vending machine that sells chips and sodas for cash or contactless? Why couldn’t this be treated the same?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt; and the difficulty of distinguishing between bots that should pay and humans who expect a free experience &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48752233&quot; title=&quot;This doesn&amp;#39;t seem to solve the issue that website operators face... which is providing a free public experience to humans while the price of hosting is driven up by increased bot traffic. The issue isn&amp;#39;t charging for API access with request caps, that&amp;#39;s not hard to do. It&amp;#39;s preserving the free experience for our users while our traffic is increasingly made up of bots. The problem is that AI has made it increasingly difficult to tell bot from human. Baking microtransactions attached to APIs into…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48748669&quot; title=&quot;Am I understanding this correct in that you can basically automate monetizing your web/api content to everyone or just agents ? Because I would be very much in support of charging agents per request, but I would want to still offer humans a free experience.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, critics worry about Cloudflare’s growing role as a &amp;#34;gatekeeper&amp;#34; of the internet and the potential for increased collateral damage to human users already struggling with aggressive bot-mitigation hurdles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48749283&quot; title=&quot;I am not a fan of the growing trend that Cloudflare is the gatekeeper of the internet. Personally I will never support this company, or firewall any of my websites behind it.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48749629&quot; title=&quot;Cloudflare wants to shake down the Big AI™ shops. I don&amp;#39;t even care anymore, AI stealing the life out of everything, or Cloudflare trying to become so global internet gatekeeper, let them kill each other.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48749937&quot; title=&quot;You realize humans are going to be the first wave of collateral damage right?  I already basically cannot browse the internet for technical information, since most high-quality forums are behind captchas that block my iPhone. If I ask an agent to do it, it does better at finding the small percentage of sources not hosted by cloudflare.  However, it generally cannot hit open-access / public domain sources (like the current legal code, or academic papers) because those are blocked and it respects…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hydrogenaudio.org/index.php/topic,129691.0.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;FFmpeg 9.1&amp;#39;s new AAC encoder&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (hydrogenaudio.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48747116&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;446 points · 149 comments · by ledoge&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FFmpeg 9.1 features a complete rewrite of its native AAC encoder, significantly improving audio quality through reengineered rate control and coding tools. Benchmarks indicate it now outperforms FDK-AAC and Apple&amp;#39;s encoder at various bitrates, though it is primarily optimized for 48kHz audio and constant bitrate (CBR) encoding. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hydrogenaudio.org/index.php/topic,129691.0.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: FFmpeg 9.1&amp;#39;s new AAC encoder    URL Source: https://hydrogenaudio.org/index.php/topic,129691.0.html    Published Time: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 05:31:01 GMT    Markdown Content:  [notcharldeon](https://hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?PHPSESSID=8os0j97i88o9isvhc0pg83dama&amp;amp;action=profile;u=172130) and 90 Guests are viewing this topic.    ![Image 1](https://hydrogenaudio.org/themes/default/images/post/xx.png)  #####…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the Opus codec is praised for vastly superior efficiency at low bitrates &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48750342&quot; title=&quot;Man what a showcase for Opus this is. Don&amp;#39;t get me wrong, this sort of thing is a valuable exercise and we are better off with better encoders for these older codecs.  But look at the numbers for Opus on this benchmark.  It simply blows all the AAC encoders out of the water even at 64 kbps.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, users emphasize that a high-quality AAC encoder remains essential due to its status as the de facto standard for live streaming and hardware compatibility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48750607&quot; title=&quot;The biggest advantage for having a good AAC encoder isn&amp;#39;t efficiency, it&amp;#39;s that for nearly the past 2 decades the de facto standard for live streamed video has been RTMP with H.264 video and AAC audio. There is basically no support for any other codecs. If you want to send a video stream to Youtube or Twitch, you will be sending H.264 and AAC. If you want an idea of how ubiquitous this is, I just checked in OBS and it will not even let you select different video and audio codecs in streaming…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48751331&quot; title=&quot;Also the fact that hardware-accelerated AAC and even full AAC offload is  ubiquitous in modern-ish hardware. I think my rice cooker can play AAC audio&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The new FFmpeg encoder aims to replace previous versions that suffered from audible artifacts, potentially eliminating the need for proprietary alternatives like Apple’s Core Audio &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48750369&quot; title=&quot;Nice, I&amp;#39;m looking forward to seeing how this performs in practice. FFmpeg&amp;#39;s previous AAC encoder produced poor quality output and often had irritating chirping artifacts, so I&amp;#39;ve always had to install Apple&amp;#39;s Core Audio encoder on any computer I do video recording on to get decent sound. I&amp;#39;ve done A/B/X comparisons and found that a 320kbps MP3 sounds better than a 320kbps AAC encoded by FFmpeg, but about the same as a 256kbps AAC encoded by Core Audio. If installing Core Audio is no longer…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also highlights a shift toward 48kHz as the modern standard for video and streaming, though the necessity of sample rates above 48kHz remains a point of contention between technical pragmatists and audiophiles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48750159&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The encoder was mainly optimized for 48Khz audio. Get over it. It&amp;#39;s 2026, resampling is free, 48Khz is the standard. 44.1Khz will work, and so will 96Khz but use 48Khz if you want the best quality. Is 48kHz really the standard nowadays?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48750289&quot; title=&quot;More or less. Streaming is often done with 48, video content has ben 48 for a while now, so unless you still produce content for CDs it is the standard. 44100 Hz had reasons no longer really needed (storing audio in 3 samples per line in VHS: 490 lines × 3 samples × 30 GPS = 44100 sample/s). Qualitywise both are more than enough snd 99.99% of people would not be able to tell it apart in a blind test. Higher sample rates than 48kHz only needed when you want to pitch down ultrasonic recordings…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48750590&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Higher sample rates than 48kHz only needed when you want to pitch down ultrasonic recordings (of whales, bats and other such animals for example). There are numerous use cases for higher sample rates that go beyond this but it&amp;#39;s hard to talk about it without starting flame wars filled with junk science.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48750714&quot; title=&quot;Say it or don&amp;#39;t but &amp;#39;I have evidence otherwise but don&amp;#39;t think I should say&amp;#39; is just as bad a flame war gateway as tempting the junk science audiophiles directly.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cleberg.net/blog/internet.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A retrospective of my time on the internet&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cleberg.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48744655&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;269 points · &lt;strong&gt;298 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by felixdoerp&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reflecting on the evolution of the internet from 2001 to 2026, this retrospective laments the transition from a decentralized &amp;#34;place&amp;#34; of exploration to a corporate-controlled utility defined by invasive algorithms, data mining, and mandatory digital intermediaries. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cleberg.net/blog/internet.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Internet I Grew Up With Doesn’t Exist Anymore    URL Source: https://cleberg.net/blog/internet.html    Markdown Content:  A thorough retrospective of my time on the internet.    ## Table of Contents    *   [1. Introduction](https://cleberg.net/blog/internet.html#introduction)  *   [2. 2001: The Family Computer](https://cleberg.net/blog/internet.html#2001-the-family-computer)  *   [3. 2004: Exploring the Web](https://cleberg.net/blog/internet.html#2004-exploring-the-web)  *   [4. 2007: Living…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters debate when the internet’s &amp;#34;golden age&amp;#34; truly ended, with older users pointing to the 1993 &amp;#34;Eternal September&amp;#34; influx of AOL users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48745224&quot; title=&quot;It looks like it starts with: &amp;gt;I was born in the late 1990s &amp;gt;2001: The Family Computer I was both in 1975 and my first experience with the Internet was in 1991 when I was 16. I thought it was amazing.  There were Usenet forums for thousands of topics and places where nerds could talk about stuff from bands to TV shows to programming languages.  There was no graphical World Wide Web (unless you worked at CERN)  We had to use Archie to find an FTP site and download a file based on the name. Does…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, while others highlight the early 2010s as a turning point marked by the rise of &amp;#34;walled gardens,&amp;#34; rage bait, and the toxicity of events like Gamergate &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48745430&quot; title=&quot;I had the same weird feeling reading the post. Where OP was &amp;#39;living there&amp;#39; in 2007, I was building sophisticated apps with big teams to do things build commercial insurance systems. I don&amp;#39;t know whether I built the things that OP missed about the old days, or paved over the things that he used as a child. If there is one thing I miss about the Internet that I grew up with, it is the trust and self-policing. We were on forums (even usenet) and got along. Now it is all walled gardens, rage bait,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48746071&quot; title=&quot;To me, &amp;#39;gamergate&amp;#39; - or I dunno, the &amp;#39;alt right&amp;#39; thing more broadly, it&amp;#39;s hard for me to remember which thing begat which, or maybe I never knew - was when I first remember thinking &amp;#39;what&amp;#39;s with all the nastiness?&amp;#39;. I was on twitter back then, and it felt to me like some kind of flood gate opening.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48746009&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, but it does seem like there have been multiple distinct changes, rather than this just being an age-based phenomenon. I seem to be about a decade older than the OP, and I&amp;#39;d also say that the early &amp;#39;10s is when things got less fun. Although I dunno, I thought &amp;#39;web 2.0&amp;#39; was just hype (and thus bad) and that Facebook was ruining everything, and those were five to ten years before 2012. So maybe it&amp;#39;s less of a specific year discontinuity in my mind than the article suggests.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some miss the era of self-policing and high accountability through real-name signatures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48745430&quot; title=&quot;I had the same weird feeling reading the post. Where OP was &amp;#39;living there&amp;#39; in 2007, I was building sophisticated apps with big teams to do things build commercial insurance systems. I don&amp;#39;t know whether I built the things that OP missed about the old days, or paved over the things that he used as a child. If there is one thing I miss about the Internet that I grew up with, it is the trust and self-policing. We were on forums (even usenet) and got along. Now it is all walled gardens, rage bait,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48746595&quot; title=&quot;it is the trust and self-policing. We were on forums (even usenet) and got along. I think it&amp;#39;s because back in Usenet days, most people posted their real names, home addresses, work addresses, and telephone numbers as part of their signatures. Now there is zero accountability for anything anyone says.  Go ahead and lie.  There is no reputational penalty. Maybe what we need is a re-birth of forms, but with accountability.  Something like Reddit, but with everyone&amp;#39;s real names and contact…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that the shift was driven less by new users and more by corporate interests, advertising, and the professionalization of online spaces &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48745972&quot; title=&quot;Isn&amp;#39;t that a bit elistist to say everything changed when more people joined? The point is not the consumers of the Internet but the producers are what changed it - primarily with advertising and walled gardens.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48746054&quot; title=&quot;This bit feels naive, in 2007: &amp;gt; While there may have been some money in it for a few select games, most were not profitable - they were created for other reasons, such as genuine intrigue in mechanics, users&amp;#39; fun, and curiosity. 2007 places us well into World of Warcraft territory. Online games were already a juggernaut and highly profitable.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite nostalgia for early autonomy, some note that modern users are better off without the constant system crashes, pervasive adware, and &amp;#34;terrible streaming&amp;#34; of the 1990s &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48746264&quot; title=&quot;Things we don&amp;#39;t have to worry about anymore: 10 ISPs worth of free trials and shortcuts on your Windows 95 desktop. AOL, MSN, Compuserve, Prodigy, AT&amp;amp;T, NetCom, UUNet, NetZero, EarthLink, MindSpring, countless local and regional providers... Your Windows 98 machine being taken over by viruses minutes after booting up Pop-ups! Pop-ups everywhere! Adware infesting your system. WeatherBug, HotBar, BonziBuddy, Ask Jeeves, Gator, you&amp;#39;d have half your screen taken up by add-on toolbars in your…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, suggesting a future&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/new-study-frog-derived-gut-bacterium&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Frog-derived gut bacterium eradicates tumors in mice&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (thefocalpoints.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48744232&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;348 points · 198 comments · by mpweiher&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A new study found that a single dose of the frog-derived bacterium *Ewingella americana* completely eradicated colorectal tumors in mice without toxicity. The naturally occurring organism outperformed chemotherapy and immunotherapy by selectively targeting the tumor microenvironment and triggering a robust immune response. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/new-study-frog-derived-gut-bacterium&quot; title=&quot;NEW STUDY: Frog-Derived Gut Bacterium Completely Eradicates 100% of Tumors After a Single Dose in Mice    A single intravenous dose of Ewingella americana achieved complete tumor elimination in 100% of treated animals, with no detectable toxicity—outperforming chemotherapy and immunotherapy.    [![FOCAL POINTS (Courageous…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the study shows promise in mice, skeptics highlight that the results involved small, induced tumors over a short two-week window and utilized questionable benchmarks against older or specific therapies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48745936&quot; title=&quot;Previus discussion (from the university press release) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46306894 (498 points | 6 months ago | 140 comments) I&amp;#39;ll rehash my comment They used mice, because they are good for early tries. The researchers had 9 bacterias and only 1 was successful. Experiments in mice are cheaper and have less ethical problems than experiments in humans. (Hey! They even injected the cancer cells in mice and waited a week until it grow. Nobody will approve something like that in…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. The discovery sparked a heated debate over environmental preservation, with some arguing that capitalist greed is destroying the biodiversity necessary for such medical breakthroughs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48745799&quot; title=&quot;We are destroying ecosystems so fast that there will be no frogs and we will regret it. The same with all the nature&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48745853&quot; title=&quot;We get what we deserve. We let the top 1% destroy our planet and also let them live the longest in their bunkers, while we deal with the repercussions of not having done enough.  But I&amp;#39;ve noticed that folks on HN are very very fond of capitalism, so it&amp;#39;s no point arguing against it on here and on the effects of wealth accumulation and greed.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48746058&quot; title=&quot;Resource exploitation and destruction of ecosystems are direct results of capitalism and greed and neglect. I stopped bringing up arguments against capitalism on here generally due to the sheer amount of people in privileged circumstances that wouldn&amp;#39;t change a thing about their ways. Also doesn&amp;#39;t help that people in tech often times have no sense of empathy whatsoever, so its no use to argue about this on here.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Others countered that environmental degradation is not unique to capitalism, citing the ecological failures of socialist regimes and questioning if central planning would offer better protection for ecosystems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48746116&quot; title=&quot;Socialist Russia was an environmental disaster. https://www.gchumanrights.org/preparedness/the-environmental...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48746294&quot; title=&quot;Can you help me understand how alternatives to capitalism, such as central planning, would necessarily be better at preserving the planet?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.workerowned.info/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Searchable directory of 22k+ products from worker-owned co-ops&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (workerowned.info)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48752905&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;394 points · 82 comments · by IESAI_ski&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Worker Owned is a searchable directory featuring over 22,000 products and services from worker-owned cooperatives, including local coffee shops and restaurants. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.workerowned.info/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Worker Owned — Find Worker-Owned Coffee Shops &amp;amp; Restaurants Near You    URL Source: https://www.workerowned.info/    Published Time: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 03:30:42 GMT    Warning: This is a cached snapshot of the original page, consider retry with caching opt-out.    Markdown Content:&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users generally praised the directory as a tool for optimizing ethical consumption within a capitalist framework &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48753070&quot; title=&quot;This is good work. Ethical consumption in a capitalist economy is unachievable...but we can optimise&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48752917&quot; title=&quot;I wanted to buy from worker-owned cooperatives but there was no single place to see what they actually sell. So I scraped the product catalogs from ~60 worker-owned co-op stores and made them searchable. 22,000+ products: coffee, chocolate, clothing, books, home goods, etc. You search, find something, and click through to buy directly from the co-op&amp;#39;s store.  Nothing goes through me. There&amp;#39;s also a section for finding worker-owned coffee shops, restaurants, and bars by city (110+ listings,…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, though some requested features like map-based searches and sensory-friendly clothing tags &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48753266&quot; title=&quot;Very nice and appreciate the effort you put into making this. Some Improvements that could help:   the location search could be an actual map with pins which would be easier to use  some kind of tags for the different appareal items would help clarify which one, currently i have to click and search each vendor for things im looking for. Specifically autistic friendly / sensory clothing items.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A central debate emerged regarding the ethics of the model: some argue co-ops are inherently more ethical due to their democratic nature &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48754522&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; There is nothing inherently ethical about co-op owned organizations nor anything inherently unethical about privately owned organizations. I disagree. Co-ops are inherently democratic. Privately owned business is inherently anti-democratic. The difference only becomes starker as the scale increases. That alone makes it seem more ethical to me, before you even get to examining the way democratic organizations obviously do a better job at checking any single person&amp;#39;s power than rule by one, as…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend that democracy does not guarantee ethical behavior and often introduces inefficiencies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48753526&quot; title=&quot;There is nothing inherently ethical about co-op owned organizations nor anything inherently unethical about privately owned organizations. The party vanguard of the worker co-op is exactly as capable of selfish or abusive behaviour as the private owner.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48754955&quot; title=&quot;Why does it seem more ethical for the organization that makes your daily bread to be democratic? I have no doubt that there are people who wish to attend meetings to vote and argue about minutia involves in the running of bakeries and other organizations. But just because people exist does not mean that the most ethical organization is one that gives them the most opportunity to exercise their particular interest in attending meetings. The vast majority of people do not want every organization…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, critics noted that the directory includes consumer co-ops like REI, which may exhibit the same aggressive corporate behaviors as traditional firms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48755615&quot; title=&quot;Curious that you include REI. It&amp;#39;s a retail coop model, not a worker-owned coop. Apropos: the way they ended the REI Adventures program is behavior consistent with a normal big-box chain. That is, announce the end simultaneously to their customers and REI&amp;#39;s partner adventure companies, provide refunds to customers, but don&amp;#39;t forward the relevant same customer info to the partners for rebooking because that&amp;#39;s REI&amp;#39;s proprietary data. If that&amp;#39;s also behavior consistent with a worker-owned coop, I…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, and questioned the price premiums on certain goods &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48754904&quot; title=&quot;I took a brief look at some of the products like coffee and im not sure they are competitive. What exactly is the premium coming from ?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ciechanow.ski/internal-combustion-engine/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Internal Combustion Engine (2021)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ciechanow.ski)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48746076&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;333 points · 104 comments · by StefanBatory&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article explains the mechanical principles of the internal combustion engine, detailing how components like pistons, crankshafts, and valves synchronize through a four-stroke cycle to convert fuel-driven explosions into rotational motion. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ciechanow.ski/internal-combustion-engine/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Internal Combustion Engine – Bartosz Ciechanowski    URL Source: https://ciechanow.ski/internal-combustion-engine/    Published Time: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:03:24 GMT    Markdown Content:  The invention of the [internal combustion engine](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_combustion_engine) in the 19 th century has revolutionized transportation over land, water, and air. Despite their omnipresence in modern day, the operation of an engine may be cryptic. Over the course of this article I’d…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the core mechanical design of internal combustion engines has remained largely unchanged for decades, modern advancements focus on precise electronic control systems to minimize pollution &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48751211&quot; title=&quot;Worth noting the design of the internal combustion engine hasn&amp;#39;t changed much in 50 years. The thing that has changed is the control systems. What used to be a primitive mechanical way of mixing fuel and air (the carburettor), is now an electronic fuel injection system, with the fuel air ratio very carefully matched to reduce pollution (fun fact:  modern cars release so little carbon monoxide, you won&amp;#39;t kill yourself by starting one in a garage (but don&amp;#39;t try it just incase your car is…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. A key technical insight involves hydrodynamic lubrication, where the crankshaft floats on a thin film of oil; however, there is debate over whether modern &amp;#34;auto start/stop&amp;#34; features cause premature engine wear by disrupting this lubrication &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48749965&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39; in real running engines the rotating crankshaft should float completely on a very thin surface of oil &amp;#39; - I found this to be a great insight.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48749822&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Presence of oil is critical here as it creates conditions for hydrodynamic lubrication. You can hear this effect in some vehicles at initial startup time for a few seconds. I know of certain Ford engines where it actually causes issues over time. The model years with auto start/stop have the worst of the cam rattle disease.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48751428&quot; title=&quot;Auto start/stop isn&amp;#39;t off for enough time for the oil to drain from the galleries and especially not out of the bearing journals. It&amp;#39;s the first few seconds after an engine has been off for hours (or worse, for potentially years) that are the problem.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48752122&quot; title=&quot;I thought it pretty well established that auto on/off is bad for the engine, as is intermittently turning off some cylinders as some do. Is that wrong?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, commenters clarified that engines rely on controlled burns rather than &amp;#34;explosions&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48750523&quot; title=&quot;Wonderful but it irritates me that so many descriptions of internal combustion engines refer to &amp;#39;explosions&amp;#39; of the fuel.  You don&amp;#39;t want that.  It causes knocking and pinging and engine damage.  You want a controlled burn that generates heat smoothly.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt; and discussed the persistent use of mechanical cams over electronic valve actuation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48754325&quot; title=&quot;What I am surprised by is that cams are still used to operate the valves. Given to how precise these need to be these days, I would&amp;#39;ve guessed they would&amp;#39;ve switched to electronically actuated valves.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.arxiv.org/2026/06/30/arxivs-next-chapter/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ArXiv&amp;#39;s Next Chapter&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.arxiv.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48741748&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;299 points · 99 comments · by subset&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On July 1, 2026, arXiv will transition from Cornell University into an independent nonprofit organization to gain greater operational flexibility while maintaining its commitment to providing free, equitable access to scientific research. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.arxiv.org/2026/06/30/arxivs-next-chapter/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Updates on our spin out from Cornell University – arXiv blog    URL Source: https://blog.arxiv.org/2026/06/30/arxivs-next-chapter/    Markdown Content:  **On July 1, 2026, arXiv will spin out from Cornell University, its home for the past 25 years, to become an independent nonprofit organization.** With this next phase in arXiv’s journey quickly approaching, you can read more about arXiv’s history and the decision to spin out from Cornell in [this recent article in the Cornell…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users value arXiv for providing open access to high-quality research and &amp;#34;director&amp;#39;s cut&amp;#34; versions of papers that bypass journal page limits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48742815&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m always grateful to arXiv. It allows non-scientists like me to access high-quality papers anytime. Thank you, always&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48743404&quot; title=&quot;It is also valuable for scientists as it is often a &amp;#39;directors cut&amp;#39; version of the paper. Journal submissions are heavy edited and shortened to fit into the page limits.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. However, there is significant debate regarding its lack of peer review, with some warning that the &amp;#34;visual grammar&amp;#34; of LaTeX can be used to launder the epistemic status of unverified blog posts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48743696&quot; title=&quot;I always struggle to figure out what role arXiv should play in my information diet. On the one hand I support Open Access research. On the other hand, peer review is vital, and a substantial quantity of “papers” on arXiv are just blog posts in a LaTeX trench coat.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48743783&quot; title=&quot;Of course some blog posts are worth citing. Then cite them as blog posts. My point is that a LaTeX PDF can launder epistemic status. An unreviewed argument starts to look like established research merely because it adopts the visual grammar of a paper.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Proposed improvements include implementing a reward-based review system with quality badges or charging AI companies for training data to fund operations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48742980&quot; title=&quot;Should charge AI for training on top of it or get them to donate. A small amount can fund them easily.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48743372&quot; title=&quot;ArXiv is a good complement to the modern peer review, IMO. As long as someone &amp;#39;vouches&amp;#39; for you, and you adhere to its minimal standards, you&amp;#39;re able to post a paper. Other readers can decide whether the paper is worth their attention, and whether the presented ideas or results are valuable. It&amp;#39;s also good that it doesn&amp;#39;t gatekeep with the paywalls that you can pretty much only afford by affiliating yourself with a toll-paying institution. Obviously, there are plenty of flaws with this system:…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://easyoptouts.com/guides/apple-hide-my-email-is-leaking-email-addresses&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apple &amp;#39;Hide My Email&amp;#39; vulnerability reveals peoples&amp;#39; real email addresses&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (easyoptouts.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48744606&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;298 points · 88 comments · by sashk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A vulnerability in Apple’s &amp;#34;Hide My Email&amp;#34; service can expose a user&amp;#39;s real email address to recipients when they use the feature to send or reply to messages. &lt;a href=&quot;https://easyoptouts.com/guides/apple-hide-my-email-is-leaking-email-addresses&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.404media.co&amp;amp;#x2F;apple-hide-my-email-vulnerability-reveals-peoples-real-email-addresses&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.404media.co&amp;amp;#x2F;apple-hide-my-email-vulnerability-re...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.vn&amp;amp;#x2F;mCbBw&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.vn&amp;amp;#x2F;mCbBw&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The vulnerability discovery has sparked frustration over Apple&amp;#39;s slow response, with one researcher claiming they have been in contact with the company for a year without a resolution &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48750865&quot; title=&quot;That timeline was exactly my experience with Apple here - https://www.grepular.com/Apples_Protect_Mail_Activity_Doesnt... They don&amp;#39;t seem to know or care what is going on with their own email systems.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48750830&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been going back and forth with Apple about it for a year. We don&amp;#39;t feel comfortable releasing the exploit details even though they&amp;#39;re being slow. We think enough people rely on Hide My Email for personal safety that it would be irresponsible.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While the specific exploit remains undisclosed to protect users who rely on the service for personal safety, some speculate the leak may stem from iCloud API flaws or contact-sharing features rather than the SMTP protocol itself &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48750830&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been going back and forth with Apple about it for a year. We don&amp;#39;t feel comfortable releasing the exploit details even though they&amp;#39;re being slow. We think enough people rely on Hide My Email for personal safety that it would be irresponsible.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48750425&quot; title=&quot;My guess would be it has nothing to do with email itself. Maybe it&amp;#39;s some iCloud API that accepts obfuscated emails but returns the original email in the response, or an ID which can be used to retrieve the iCloud email from another API endpoint. Could be as simple as an &amp;#39;add contact/friend&amp;#39; feature in some Apple product (like a mail client, or a file sharing service) that resolves the obfuscated email to the original iCloud account.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48751185&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; We think enough people rely on Hide My Email for personal safety that it would be irresponsible. I am guessing you haven&amp;#39;t tried that excuse on the users your witholding is leaving exposed.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, users debated Apple Mail&amp;#39;s privacy standards, noting that the client often embeds sender IP addresses in headers, though this behavior may be specific to certain providers like Gmail &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48751942&quot; title=&quot;I’m still mildly annoyed every email I send using Mail has my IP embedded in it&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48754067&quot; title=&quot;Seems like this is a Gmail thing: https://ylukem.com/blog/apple-mail-leaks-your-ip-address&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48752411&quot; title=&quot;It’s in the headers. Send an email to your self from Mail and open the source in the inbox. There is your IP.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-06-30</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-06-30</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://thereallo.dev/blog/claude-code-prompt-steganography&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Claude Code is steganographically marking requests&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (thereallo.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48734373&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2436 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 746 comments · by kirushik&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic’s Claude Code tool reportedly uses steganography to silently embed tracking data into system prompts by subtly altering punctuation and date formats. This hidden marking triggers when users route requests through custom API URLs, allowing Anthropic to identify specific timezones, proxy services, and potential competitors. &lt;a href=&quot;https://thereallo.dev/blog/claude-code-prompt-steganography&quot; title=&quot;Title: Claude Code Is Steganographically Marking Requests    URL Source: https://thereallo.dev/blog/claude-code-prompt-steganography    Markdown Content:  I was inspecting Claude Code for privacy reasons.    Most devs give their harnesses ridiculous access. FS, shell, git, browser access, even computer use nowadays. That is the whole point. They need enough context to do useful work.    That also means the client itself deserves scrutiny. If a coding agent can read your repo and run commands, the binary…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discovery of steganographic marking in Claude Code has sparked a debate over corporate transparency, with critics arguing that Anthropic’s lack of honest disclosure regarding hidden client-side behavior is a breach of trust &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48737661&quot; title=&quot;There are some commentors in this thread downplaying the severity of a service provider being less than transparent about exactly what their shipped tooling does on customer&amp;#39;s machines. That the provider&amp;#39;s business needs necessitate the this behaviour doesn&amp;#39;t justify their lack of honest disclosure. That honest disclosure would render the solution to their problem useless isn&amp;#39;t my problem. If anything, that they thought this was acceptable makes me wonder what else they&amp;#39;re harvesting from my…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48738083&quot; title=&quot;To summarize what they&amp;#39;ve already been doing: - filtering out people from the wrong side of &amp;#39;all humanity&amp;#39;, years before it was demanded by the government - downgrading their models in arbitrary ways (later saying &amp;#39;sorry but not really&amp;#39;) - actively sabotaging the replies, as in covertly modifying them to feed the users incorrect results What&amp;#39;s next to expect from Anthropic? Malware to brick your machine if they don&amp;#39;t like you? Extending this to more people they don&amp;#39;t like? I think I already can…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users view these measures as a necessary defense against model distillation by foreign competitors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48738768&quot; title=&quot;Whether or not you find Anthropic&amp;#39;s behavior bad, theybhave been very loudly stating the foreign labs have been distilling their models for a while now. This seems like an obvious response to me that would be a mechanism to make that obvious.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48737018&quot; title=&quot;The conclusion of this blog post is a bit hysterical. The intent of this steg is excruciatingly clear (identifying usage by Chinese firms that may be conducting model distillation). It&amp;#39;s unclear on how this &amp;#39;punishes normal developers&amp;#39; in any shape or form.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others highlight the irony of an AI company aggressively protecting its IP after training on copyrighted data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48739112&quot; title=&quot;From my understanding, distilling the model with another model is not illegal per se. Also, the output of the LLM is public domain by law, too. So, why all this &amp;#39;effort&amp;#39; to protect the model? This is a free market, and moving fast and breaking things is the norm. If they are so adamant on protecting their IP, maybe they can start by respecting others&amp;#39; IP, so we can start talking about ethics, equality and playing fair.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48739250&quot; title=&quot;oh no, the company that illegally used every possible media they could get their hands on is crying that some other company is doing something potentially shady but not illegal? And using that excuse to put in place hidden surveillance systems on their customers?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical observers noted the implementation was surprisingly &amp;#34;sloppy&amp;#34; and lacked plausible deniability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48735460&quot; title=&quot;Value judgment aside: I am a bit surprised at how sloppily they did this. I think they could&amp;#39;ve achieved the same effect while decreasing the odds of detection via reverse engineering. (This field is known as &amp;#39;underhanded code&amp;#39;, coined by the Underhanded C contest: https://www.underhanded-c.org . It&amp;#39;s a little-known &amp;#39;art&amp;#39;; little-known for probably self-explanatory reasons. There are much cleverer ways of achieving objectives like this. One obviously being you can move more out of the client…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, while defenders suggest such extreme measures are logical if one believes the company is racing toward a high-stakes &amp;#34;superintelligence&amp;#34; that must be gated from bad actors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48740064&quot; title=&quot;HN hysteria is ridiculous. All of this is totally understandable if you take the perspective that these people genuinely believe they&amp;#39;re building superintelligence. The overwhelming majority of the AI safety crowd - which has poured more of their life and time into thinking about these problems than the average HN armchair commentator ever would - understands that: - you want to prevent China from getting to superintelligence first - you must gate access of SI to known good actors - and that…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-sonnet-5&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Claude Sonnet 5&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (anthropic.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736605&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1262 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 783 comments · by marinesebastian&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic has launched Claude Sonnet 5, a more &amp;#34;agentic&amp;#34; model featuring significant improvements in reasoning, coding, and tool use. Available across all plans, it offers performance near the Opus-class models at a lower price point, with introductory pricing starting at $2 per million input tokens. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-sonnet-5&quot; title=&quot;Title: Introducing Claude Sonnet 5    URL Source: https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-sonnet-5    Markdown Content:  Claude Sonnet 5 is built to be the most agentic Sonnet model yet. It can make plans, use tools like browsers and terminals, and run autonomously at a level that, just a few months ago, required larger and more expensive models.    For many developers, the agentic AI era began with Sonnet-class models: Claude Sonnet 3.5, 3.6, and 3.7 were the first models that showed impressive skills…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of Claude Sonnet 5 has sparked debate over its pricing and utility, with users noting that Opus remains more cost-effective for high-effort tasks and that Sonnet 5&amp;#39;s performance on benchmarks like trivia and puzzles is inconsistent &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736821&quot; title=&quot;The cost per task chart is telling me that I should _never_ use Sonnet 5 above medium effort level - Opus always performs better for a given cost. So I guess the takeaway is that if Sonnet 5 medium isn&amp;#39;t good enough for you, switch models, not effort levels.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736807&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Evaluations also show that it has a much lower ability to perform cybersecurity tasks than our current Opus models. Why would they brag about something like this? It&amp;#39;s like they know people want to use models to perform cybersecurity tasks yet knowingly deny them the ability. And Opus 4.8 is still cheaper for a higher pass rate (much less open weight models like GLM 5.2) so not sure why I&amp;#39;d use Sonnet except on the low effort level for I suppose trivial tasks where I want it to work only 50%…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48739631&quot; title=&quot;I just tested it on my benchmarks[0], it&amp;#39;s GLM-5.2 level, at 2x cost, but also 2x faster. Weak spots (categories it fails): - Trivia — 0/3 - basically not much built-in knowledge      - Combined tool-calling tasks — score 45/100, sometimes makes invalid tool calls      - Puzzle Solving — score 77, flubs carwash-like tests [0]: https://aibenchy.com/compare/anthropic-claude-sonnet-4-6-med...&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A central tension exists between Anthropic’s push for &amp;#34;fully agentic&amp;#34; capabilities and the needs of users who prefer &amp;#34;agent-assisted&amp;#34; development, with some reporting that models optimized for autonomy increasingly ignore specific human instructions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736833&quot; title=&quot;Claude Sonnet 5 is built to be the most agentic Sonnet model yet. It can make plans, use tools like browsers and terminals, and run autonomously at a level that, just a few months ago, required larger and more expensive models. I have been using Sonnet 4.6 more than Opus, because I&amp;#39;m mostly doing agent-assisted development and not fully agent-driven development. This announcement does not make me positive, I have found that the more models are optimized for fully agentic development, the worse…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48737363&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, there&amp;#39;s a real opportunity for one of these companies to invest time in a model that&amp;#39;s tuned for, to use your term, agent-assisted developement. Trouble is, everyone inside their buildings seems to believe that no one will be working like that in a year or two.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48737047&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been largely disappointed how much the Claude models ignore custom instructions, and sometimes even prompts on the chat interface. It sometimes feels like talking to a wall, or as if there was a third person in the chatroom whose messages I can&amp;#39;t see. I can&amp;#39;t help but feel this is intentional towards the &amp;#39;Agentic&amp;#39; workflow.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that even minor productivity boosts represent a massive economic opportunity, others criticize the industry&amp;#39;s focus on replacing human labor and the potential for skill atrophy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48737527&quot; title=&quot;There’s no way to justify their valuations if they get downgraded to a pair programming tool. They need fully agentic stuff to work and replace human engineers to even come close. Offhand, I’m not even certain whether a model like that could justify the constant retraining we’re doing on the agentic models. It doesn’t make a lot of sense to spend millions or billions on training to reduce hallucinations by 0.3% if your model assumes a human is in the loop to course-correct them.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48741308&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;re actively trying to use lobbying power to make open weight models illegal. So I&amp;#39;m just not going to use their services at all anymore. I don&amp;#39;t think they&amp;#39;re a net gain if you&amp;#39;re a skilled senior, and the hidden cost in terms of technical debt and skill atrophy is just being swept under the rug. I&amp;#39;ll be okay without their bullshit generator.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48738264&quot; title=&quot;Some napkin math -- total global labor compensation is about 50% of the GDP, which puts it in the USD 50 - 60 Trillion range: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/labor-share-of-gdp This source claims that knowledge workers alone (probably because they are paid much more) account for 35 - 50 Trillion of that: https://github.com/danielmiessler/Substrate/blob/main/Data/K... If LLMs can boost their productivity even by an average of 5% (studies from ~2024 put it in the ~30% range depending on task)…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the complexity of managing various model effort levels has led some users to stick to defaults or migrate to faster, cheaper alternatives like GLM-5.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/AnthropicAI/status/2072106151890809341&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Department of Commerce has lifted export controls on Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48740771&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;973 points · 690 comments · by Pragmata&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic will begin restoring access to its Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models tomorrow following the Department of Commerce&amp;#39;s decision to lift export controls on the technology. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/AnthropicAI/status/2072106151890809341&quot; title=&quot;Title: We’ve received notice that the Department of Commerce has lifted export controls on Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5.    We&amp;#39;ll begin restoring access tomorrow, and will share an update soon.    We’re grateful to our users for their patience, and to everyone who worked with us on    URL Source: https://twitter.com/AnthropicAI/status/2072106151890809341    Published Time: 2026-06-30T23:52:59.000Z    Warning: This page contains iframe that are currently hidden, consider enabling iframe…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Department of Commerce’s decision to lift export controls on Anthropic’s Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models has sparked a debate over the reliability of American frontier AI for business-critical functions, with some arguing that recent regulatory volatility makes these models too risky for &amp;#34;load-bearing&amp;#34; infrastructure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48741070&quot; title=&quot;The damage is done. You cannot build a business critical function on top of American SOTA frontier model. Especially not with the current crew in charge. Now whether AI tech is in the same league as say Nuclear tech and therefore by any reasonable standard should be regulated is a different question. We hit the slippery slope on a random day in June 2026 and there is no putting the genie back in the bottle. Any exec or manager that puts load bearing weight on top of…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these concerns, many users maintain that the &amp;#34;ludicrous&amp;#34; productivity gains in coding and speed necessitate their use to remain competitive, even if the output requires significant human oversight or is occasionally downgraded to older models for safety reasons &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48741161&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m a small software business owner in Europe. I have to assume my competition is willing to pay for any business advantage they can get. And so I also have to pay for the SOTA model, whatever it is.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48741301&quot; title=&quot;Speed.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48741430&quot; title=&quot;This x 10 . I don’t understand how people are saying you can’t use LLMs to get crazy productivity gains. If you can’t write quality code with LLMs at ludicrous speed, you’re holding it wrong.  You will have occasional bad days and regressions. But overall you’re still going to be able to 4x your progress.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48742140&quot; title=&quot;Fable 5 apparently can&amp;#39;t be used for coding? (This is from Anthropic&amp;#39;s announcement.) &amp;gt; After a series of productive conversations with the US government, we&amp;#39;re redeploying the model with a new set of classifiers to target and block more cybersecurity tasks. In the near term, some routine tasks like coding and debugging will fall back to Opus 4.8. Edit: the above was from their tweet announcement at https://x.com/AnthropicAI/status/2072163884430229756 ... the associated blog post at…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some critics dismiss LLM-generated code as &amp;#34;vomit,&amp;#34; others argue that for non-critical tasks, the speed of &amp;#34;good enough&amp;#34; code outweighs the need for it to be perfectly battle-hardened &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48741610&quot; title=&quot;I have plenty of experience with LLMs and use them daily but definitely wouldn&amp;#39;t call generated code &amp;#39;quality code.&amp;#39; Often looks like complete vomit.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48741683&quot; title=&quot;Ok, and? You can live with that if there are more important things to deal with. I&amp;#39;ve stared at ugly LLM code, that I had just had generated, and  worked well enough for my purposes. (generally, some quick recursion into a nested python dictionary in order to dig out some property -- especially for linting or quick data analysis). And I wanted something better, sure, something a bit more readable ...but I just needed it to work well enough to recurse through a yaml file for config file linting,…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2026/06/the-post-covid-decline-in-the-labor-share/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The labor share of income in the US is at its lowest post-war level&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48734234&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;502 points · &lt;strong&gt;546 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by loughnane&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The U.S. labor share of income has reached its lowest post-war level following a sharp post-pandemic decline, a trend driven by within-industry changes rather than sectoral reallocation and which largely mirrors cyclical patterns observed in pre-2000 recessions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2026/06/the-post-covid-decline-in-the-labor-share/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Post‑COVID Decline in the Labor Share    URL Source: https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2026/06/the-post-covid-decline-in-the-labor-share/    Published Time: 2026-06-24T11:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  Richard Audoly, Miles Guerin, Srinidhi Narayanan, and Rachel Schuh    ![Image 1: Top view of a bustling factory floor, workers in bright safety vests moving between rows of gleaming machinery , concept of Manufacturing processes and Productivity optimization, created with…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the labor share of income has dropped significantly since 2000, users debate whether this is due to workers capturing less of the value they produce &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48734734&quot; title=&quot;People are misreading the conclusion - the Covid related drop is normal and matches previous episodes, but the massive overall drop since 2000 is not. The situation on the ground is unchanged - the amount of labor being generated per person has not really changed, but the overall pie has grown massively around us.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48735455&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; amount of labor being generated per person has not really changed not true, labor productivity has been steadily increasing: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/OPHNFB workers are simply capturing less of the economic value generated by their labor.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt; or if the data is skewed by rising employer-paid healthcare costs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48734598&quot; title=&quot;The actual labor share of income is significantly higher when you include employer contributions to employee health insurance premiums. Healthcare costs have been rising faster than overall inflation for decades, and while many of those costs are passed on to employees the employers have also absorbed a significant chunk. If we want to increase the labor share then we&amp;#39;ll drive down healthcare spending. And no, there&amp;#39;s no simple solution to this problem. The notion that something like &amp;#39;Medicare…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a sharp disagreement regarding the current state of the American public; some argue that half the country lives in &amp;#34;abject poverty&amp;#34; with a declining quality of life &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48734916&quot; title=&quot;We have one of the worlds most prosperous economies, and half of the US is living in abject poverty while quality of life for everyone is decreasing.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend this is a hyperbolic mischaracterization of modern prosperity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48734998&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m going to go on a limb and say half of the US is not living in abject poverty?  Nor can I get behind the idea that quality of life for folks is on the down trend.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, commenters highlight that the top 10% have captured the majority of recent GDP growth &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48735096&quot; title=&quot;This is consistent with the observation that the top 10% have captured a disproportionate share of GDP growth over the past few decades. https://equitablegrowth.org/new-data-reveal-how-u-s-economic... &amp;#39;The past three economic expansions have largely benefitted the top 10 percent. In each, the top decile received between 47 percent and 59 percent of all income growth in the expansion.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, often utilizing complex tax strategies to defer or minimize reported income &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48734376&quot; title=&quot;The annoying/sad/infuriating thing is the ultra wealthy don’t have “income.” Technically, according to IRS rules, much of what they experience (housing, food, etc) should be classified as income. But their lawyers and accountants help them keep that looking quite low.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48734414&quot; title=&quot;I used to think this - but when I talked to a tax lawyer friend and we walked through the steps they take, usually they&amp;#39;re just deferring taxation that does end up getting paid by an entity eventually.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://europeancorrespondent.com/en/r/the-us-ambassador-had-belgian-police-stop-our-reporting&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The US ambassador had Belgian police stop our reporting&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (europeancorrespondent.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48730608&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;693 points · 334 comments · by robtherobber&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Belgian police detained and removed journalists from a U.S. independence anniversary event in Brussels after the American embassy labeled a reporter an &amp;#34;active threat&amp;#34; following his attempt to question Ambassador Bill White. &lt;a href=&quot;https://europeancorrespondent.com/en/r/the-us-ambassador-had-belgian-police-stop-our-reporting&quot; title=&quot;Title: The US ambassador had Belgian police stop our reporting    URL Source: https://europeancorrespondent.com/en/r/the-us-ambassador-had-belgian-police-stop-our-reporting    Published Time: 2026-06-29T01:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  We went there to cover it. We put questions to senior politicians, including the US ambassador to Belgium, Bill White. After attempting to ask a question, we were pulled out of the event by police, had our IDs taken and were then questioned – before the embassy…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The incident highlights a perceived decline in free speech and diplomatic norms, with users noting that the US ambassador to Belgium has previously interfered in local judicial matters and insulted politicians &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48731545&quot; title=&quot;For additional context, tensions are already high surrounding the US ambassador after he directly insulted multiple Belgian politicians and also attempted to interfere with local criminal judicial proceedings.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48731579&quot; title=&quot;free speech, I fear, is in retreat&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters point to a pattern of controversial US diplomatic appointments, including a convicted felon in France and a &amp;#34;clown&amp;#34; in Canada, suggesting these officials prioritize personal or political agendas over traditional diplomacy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48731758&quot; title=&quot;The American ambassador to Canada is also a complete clown. It’s pretty obvious he has an audience of one and absolutely loves the flavour of boot black.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48732208&quot; title=&quot;The US ambassador to France is a convicted felon, father of Jared Kushner. From Wikipedia: «In February 2026, French authorities restricted Kushner’s direct access to government ministers after he failed to attend a summons from Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot, sending a senior embassy official in his place. The French foreign ministry cited an &amp;#39;apparent failure to grasp the basic requirements of the ambassadorial mission&amp;#39;.»&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Much of the tension stems from the ambassador accusing Belgium of antisemitism regarding the prosecution of unlicensed ritual circumcisions, a stance some users link to broader US pressure against European nations that attempt to regulate the practice &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48732400&quot; title=&quot;For context: he&amp;#39;s accused Belgium of being anti-semitic because a couple of Orthodox Jewish mohels are being prosecuted for practicing illicit medicine (i.e. performing ritual circumcision without a medical license). The investigation started after a complaint was filed by a rabbi, so it&amp;#39;s hard to chalk this up to anti-semitisim, but that&amp;#39;s modern day US diplomacy for you.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48732765&quot; title=&quot;What is weird in all of this is why is the US obsessed with israel so much exactly! Was it a random choice; did they had a random number generator pick it? Why are they not going to such lengths for other random countries in the opposite side of the world for example? And if an official&amp;#39;s number one priority is not the people that pay him and have granted him his power, should he be in that position? The US is turning into a planetary joke and it&amp;#39;s sad to see.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48733050&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s considered very anti-semitic in America to be against male genital mutilation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Defamation_League#Circumc... When Iceland tried to ban it, the ADL had some very choice words about the potential consequences. &amp;gt; Greenblatt sent Iceland&amp;#39;s Parliament a letter regarding a proposed infant circumcision ban in that country, arguing that the ban should be rejected due to circumcision&amp;#39;s religious significance and health benefits. Greenblatt also said that if the ban…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://waag.org/en/article/european-digital-id-wallets-are-gift-google-and-apple/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;European digital ID wallets rely on safety services of Google and Apple&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (waag.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48730729&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;708 points · 309 comments · by donohoe&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;European governments are facing criticism for building digital ID wallets that rely on Google and Apple’s proprietary security services, a move experts warn reinforces Big Tech monopolies and excludes users of alternative, privacy-focused operating systems. &lt;a href=&quot;https://waag.org/en/article/european-digital-id-wallets-are-gift-google-and-apple/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Waag | European digital ID wallets are a gift to Google and Apple    URL Source: https://waag.org/en/article/european-digital-id-wallets-are-gift-google-and-apple/    Markdown Content:  European governments are rolling out digital identity wallets, which are to be used by citizens to access services, and to verify their age online. As reported by [Follow the Money](https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/nl-wallet-werkt-niet-zonder-amerikaanse-tech) and [Android…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The European digital ID initiative faces heavy criticism for its reliance on Google and Apple’s infrastructure, which many argue undermines the EU&amp;#39;s stated goal of digital sovereignty &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48730943&quot; title=&quot;A European digital ID system that is entirely dependent on 2 US companies. Wasn&amp;#39;t there some talk about the pressing need for European digital sovereignty recently?  Or was that just performative nonsense?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48731047&quot; title=&quot;Europe will never have digital sovereignty from the US. It will take 100 years and an extremely expensive, government-mandated reimplementation of every critical US tech service and company. No EU country is putting up budget for this, and no private enterprise is going to do it because building a worse version of AWS just so that it is &amp;#39;European&amp;#39; makes no financial sense and would most likely just fail anyway.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users advocate for lawsuits against the use of remote attestation and the exclusion of privacy-focused OSs like GrapheneOS &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48731161&quot; title=&quot;The EU reference for wallets strictly required google play services https://github.com/eu-digital-identity-wallet/eudi-app-andro... So Italy&amp;#39;s IO app https://github.com/pagopa/io-app (wallet, documents, age verification) continuously refuses the users&amp;#39; request for GrapheneOS support and requires google. Nothing will change until the lawsuits start coming in. The only hope is the motorola/grapheneOS collaboration and consumer associations, that might sue for anticompetitive behavior. Make noise…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48732969&quot; title=&quot;I think there are two fights that are both worth fighting: 1. Completely outlawing remote attestation. 2. In a world where remote attestation is given, let it be controlled in a fair way and not just by Google and Apple. The risk is that only fighting for (1) leaves you in a world with remote attestation, where only Google and Apple can decide who gets to pass and who not. In fact, that is pretty much the world we are in already. I agree that they are both worth fighting for, but I think (2) is…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that EU regulations inadvertently reinforce US monopolies because no homegrown alternatives currently exist to replace these software stacks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48730958&quot; title=&quot;Regulations create monopolies. Even when regulations are aimed at curbing the control of giants, smaller players usually can&amp;#39;t afford them and lose market share. This is actually taught as a competitive advantage strategy in business school. Corporations lobby the government to implement laws that seem to hurt them but in actuality create an uneven playing field where marketshare becomes available due to the higher implementation cost.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48731062&quot; title=&quot;Not really. EU is actually trying to decouple. But in many cases there are not any homegrown alternatives to support. There is not a single company in EU that could replace, even a considerable part, of software stack provided by Google and Apple. And, unless the regulatory environment changes., there probably never will be.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, there is a deep skepticism that Europe can achieve independence from US tech without a massive, century-long investment that currently lacks both the budget and the political will &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48731047&quot; title=&quot;Europe will never have digital sovereignty from the US. It will take 100 years and an extremely expensive, government-mandated reimplementation of every critical US tech service and company. No EU country is putting up budget for this, and no private enterprise is going to do it because building a worse version of AWS just so that it is &amp;#39;European&amp;#39; makes no financial sense and would most likely just fail anyway.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48731228&quot; title=&quot;The lawsuits, sadly, won&amp;#39;t matter. &amp;#39;Security&amp;#39; (or, rather, totalitarian control!) is more important than the 1% of nerds who care enough to tinker with their phone.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://apnews.com/live/birthright-citizenship-decision-supreme-court-updates-06-30-2026&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Supreme Court upholds broad conception of birthright citizenship&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (apnews.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48733406&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;224 points · &lt;strong&gt;622 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by toomuchtodo&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment, rejecting the Trump administration&amp;#39;s attempts to limit it while separately upholding state bans on transgender athletes and agreeing to hear challenges to semiautomatic weapon bans. &lt;a href=&quot;https://apnews.com/live/birthright-citizenship-decision-supreme-court-updates-06-30-2026&quot; title=&quot;Title: Supreme Court rejects Trump’s limits | AP News    URL Source: https://apnews.com/live/birthright-citizenship-decision-supreme-court-updates-06-30-2026    Markdown Content:  [](https://apnews.com/live/birthright-citizenship-decision-supreme-court-updates-06-30-2026)  ## **Venezuelan asylum seeker with 2 daughters born in US relieved by court ruling**    Loreana Pachano, a Venezuelan asylum seeker in Lehi, Utah, with two daughters who became U.S. citizens by birth, said the court’s decision was a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Supreme Court&amp;#39;s ruling sparked debate over the &amp;#34;jurisdiction&amp;#34; clause of the 14th Amendment, with some arguing the text is vague enough to exclude children of temporary visitors or illegal immigrants &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48734130&quot; title=&quot;The U.S. Constitution is very far from being clear. The whole purpose of the Supreme Court is to explain the meaning of what is written in the Constitution; there are 9 justices in the court and they often disagree on that. Just look at the second amendment: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,    the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The &amp;#39;well regulated militia&amp;#39; phrase caused at least two very different opinions: United…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48734064&quot; title=&quot;Looking at the dissents (Justice Gorsuch) it appears that he would consider illegal immigrants’ kids are citizens, but kids of legal non-immigrants are not based on the fact that one is a temporary visitor and another is not!&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend the clause was intended only to exclude diplomats &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48734400&quot; title=&quot;The jurisdiction clause is there because of diplomats. It&amp;#39;s a common thing in other Jus Solis countries, for good reason.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48734482&quot; title=&quot;So, when I enter as a tourist, I&amp;#39;m not in jurisdiction? Sweet! Crime time!&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics of birthright citizenship argue it creates &amp;#34;perverse incentives&amp;#34; and note that the vast majority of countries do not offer unconditional citizenship by birth &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48733826&quot; title=&quot;You can be pro/fine with legal immigration (and moderate/non-partisan) and still not think birthright citizenship is a good idea (like I do). Also ~95% of countries don&amp;#39;t have unconditional birthright citizenship. It creates perverse incentives. Reminds me of legal abortion: practically everywhere in the world has it. If you are not in that vast majority you should be taking a very close look at yourself/things. So yes, let&amp;#39;s amend the constitution. It&amp;#39;s been a while and we do it on average…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, though it remains a standard practice across the Americas &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48733886&quot; title=&quot;Note: There are ~30ish countries that provide citizenship to anyone born within their national borders (many with restrictions, for whatever that may mean). Largely, this covers a spotting of countries across the globe, but is almost universally true within the Americas.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the ruling, the narrow 6-3 (or 5-4) split and lengthy dissents led some commenters to criticize the current state of the Court and the perceived inconsistency of textualist interpretations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48733920&quot; title=&quot;The most obvious read of the constitution in the world still being a 6-3 verdict shows the state of the Supreme Court today.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48738923&quot; title=&quot;If you shift from being a living constitutionalist to a strict textualist based on the case in question, then what you really are is a machiavellian.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48733818&quot; title=&quot;5-4 though, yikes! This shouldn&amp;#39;t have even been close. With an impassioned 91 page dissent by Thomas. What a chode.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://claude.com/product/claude-science&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Claude Science&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (claude.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48735770&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;562 points · 174 comments · by lebovic&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic has launched Claude Science, a beta research environment for macOS and Linux that automates data analysis, connects to over 60 scientific databases, and manages high-performance computing tasks to streamline workflows from data wrangling to publication. &lt;a href=&quot;https://claude.com/product/claude-science&quot; title=&quot;Title: Claude Science beta | Claude by Anthropic    URL Source: https://claude.com/product/claude-science    Markdown Content:  The Claude Science app runs analyses, searches databases, and traces every step from data wrangling to publication, so you can spend time on science.    ![Image 1](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6889473510b50328dbb70ae6/6a43a5a03afe3e4b6dd7ab14_lab-06.avif)    ![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Critics argue that &amp;#34;Claude Science&amp;#34; risks exacerbating the &amp;#34;reproducibility crisis&amp;#34; and the proliferation of low-quality &amp;#34;paper-mill&amp;#34; publications rather than addressing fundamental scientific bottlenecks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48735968&quot; title=&quot;Science isn’t suffering from a lack of papers. It’s suffering from a lack of good papers. Making it easier to just pump out paper-mill publications is about the last thing science needs right now.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736026&quot; title=&quot;Scientific research is suffering from a reproducibility crisis. Not a publication crisis. LLM&amp;#39;s aren&amp;#39;t going to solve reproducibility issues.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736081&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;re gonna worsen it&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users dismiss the tool as a &amp;#34;LaTeX editor&amp;#34; or a source of hallucinated references &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736916&quot; title=&quot;I built one of the connected tools included in this launch (the Biomni HPC [1]), and I have spent an inordinate amount of my life working on this problem. (I also worked at Anthropic, but not on this product.) As other comments have pointed out, this is for data science – but it&amp;#39;s capable of more than making plots and writing papers [2]. It has integrations with many databases and computational tools, including a researcher&amp;#39;s institutional cluster. That alone is valuable. I founded a startup…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736063&quot; title=&quot;tl;dr: Use this if you don&amp;#39;t like doing science or doing things well. It hallucinates references. Seems to be based on https://github.com/swaruplab/operon as evidenced by the authorization dialog and https://x.com/testingcatalog/status/2037684573161783373 . Mostly targeted at life sciences - e.g. integration for FDA, PubMed, genomics databases but no ACM / IEEE as far as I can tell. Edit: arXiv search seems to be supported - but not Google Scholar etc. So, this tool is of little use for most…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48738884&quot; title=&quot;Well LLMs are largely useless and people are realizing that.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend it provides significant value by automating &amp;#34;hacky&amp;#34; academic code and bridging the gap between researchers and antiquated data infrastructures like FTP-based genomics databases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736916&quot; title=&quot;I built one of the connected tools included in this launch (the Biomni HPC [1]), and I have spent an inordinate amount of my life working on this problem. (I also worked at Anthropic, but not on this product.) As other comments have pointed out, this is for data science – but it&amp;#39;s capable of more than making plots and writing papers [2]. It has integrations with many databases and computational tools, including a researcher&amp;#39;s institutional cluster. That alone is valuable. I founded a startup…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736485&quot; title=&quot;A lot of the soft and hard sciences use hacky matplotlib code to produce results and visualisation, without being necessarily data science From the bits I&amp;#39;ve seen, I&amp;#39;d take claude-generated code any time over that written by maths, physics, biology, linguistics people. Even though I&amp;#39;ve seen Claude make some super-big mistakes while doing data analysis I&amp;#39;d guess it&amp;#39;s already more reliable than most academics trying to code.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a broader concern that scientific discourse may shift away from core research topics toward the logistics of managing LLMs, though proponents suggest AI could eventually be used to audit data and hold papers to higher standards &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48738167&quot; title=&quot;Before LLMs the tech groups I followed were ripping with discussions about this and that topic, what to use and when; I believe these discussions sparked the creation of many frameworks and tools out of &amp;#39;this seems like a good idea, wouldn&amp;#39;t hurt to implement it&amp;#39;. Unfortunately it all resolves around LLMs nowadays and how to make some LLM work some way or another, we don&amp;#39;t even discuss the very topics the groups were created to discuss. I fear science is soon to taste the same thing -…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736227&quot; title=&quot;Isn&amp;#39;t this just blanket cynicism? In the long run conceivable we could use AI to hold papers to a much higher standard, audit all the data and code that is associated etc.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://deepmind.google/models/gemini-image/flash-lite/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Nano Banana 2 Lite&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (deepmind.google)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48735444&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;434 points · 194 comments · by minimaxir&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google DeepMind has introduced Nano Banana 2 Lite, its fastest and most cost-efficient Gemini image model designed for rapid-fire generation and editing. The low-latency model is built for creators and developers to iterate high-quality visuals at scale while maintaining precision and real-world knowledge. &lt;a href=&quot;https://deepmind.google/models/gemini-image/flash-lite/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Nano Banana 2 Lite    URL Source: https://deepmind.google/models/gemini-image/flash-lite/    Markdown Content:  [Skip to main content](https://deepmind.google/models/gemini-image/flash-lite/#page-content)    ## Explore our next generation AI systems    [Explore models](https://deepmind.google/models/)    Gemini    [![Image 1](https://storage.googleapis.com/gdm-deepmind-com-prod-public/media/original_images/nav__dm__gemini__large.svg) Gemini Build intelligent…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of Nano Banana 2 Lite has sparked debate over the ethics of AI-generated real estate listings, with some users arguing that &amp;#34;Ikea-chic&amp;#34; filters used to mask dilapidated properties constitute deceptive false advertising &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736219&quot; title=&quot;The first example of generating home interiors fills me with indescribable hatred. Recently real estate agents have taken to running every dilapidated unsellable apartment through these AI filters, and you have to scroll through a dozen of these Ikea-chic images of what the apartment presumably could look like, before you are allowed to see the horrors they are trying to peddle at insane prices.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736246&quot; title=&quot;I think that should be illegal and misrepresenting.  Lots of gray area with AI usage.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48737793&quot; title=&quot;Wouldn&amp;#39;t that fall under existing false advertising laws, if you&amp;#39;re putting fake/altered images in the listing?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48738104&quot; title=&quot;It should, I would assume.  But for some reason, it seems nobody is enforcing consumer protections like they used to. Pretty soon they&amp;#39;ll take the stickers off mowers warning people to not put their hand under it while it&amp;#39;s running. The world isn&amp;#39;t in a good place...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While one commenter views this as a &amp;#34;massive productivity boost&amp;#34; for the economy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736364&quot; title=&quot;Why should that be illegal?   It’s multiplying the productivity of our economy, instead of someone having to waste time and money making the apartment actually look like that, you can just generate an image of it, that’s massive productivity boost with no harm done to the final product, unless the tenant cares about the slippage between a generated image of an apartment that looks nice and an apartment that’s actually nice. And plus thats time the real estate agent could have spent prompting…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others express frustration with Google’s restrictive account requirements and the model&amp;#39;s pricing relative to its performance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48735841&quot; title=&quot;I received early access to test this model. (through work — Google still does not like me personally lol) It works as advertised here, and it does behave like a distilled Nano Banana 2 with respect to certain elements such as good text rendering, which Nano Banana 1 does much worse with. It is definitely not at the level of the base Nano Banana 2 of course particularly with highly-nuanced prompts. My main criticism is that you cannot programmatically force aspect ratios with NB2L but you can…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48739053&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s nice but it&amp;#39;s on google&amp;#39;s broken AI studio thing. I can&amp;#39;t use half the stuff on there because it requires a Google One account. Which I&amp;#39;m ineligible for because I&amp;#39;m on a workspace account. Can I switch? No, because Google One doesn&amp;#39;t support own domains. So I need to run (AND PAY!) two accounts to have both a nice email address and Banana? Starting to think the correct number of paid google accounts here is zero.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Technically, the model is noted for improved text rendering over its predecessor, though it remains significantly behind ChatGPT Image 2 in quality benchmarks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48735841&quot; title=&quot;I received early access to test this model. (through work — Google still does not like me personally lol) It works as advertised here, and it does behave like a distilled Nano Banana 2 with respect to certain elements such as good text rendering, which Nano Banana 1 does much worse with. It is definitely not at the level of the base Nano Banana 2 of course particularly with highly-nuanced prompts. My main criticism is that you cannot programmatically force aspect ratios with NB2L but you can…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736076&quot; title=&quot;That is fair to point out. For those who don&amp;#39;t know, ChatGPT Image 2 has an absurd ELO of 1387; compared to the #2 model at 1273, it&amp;#39;s over 100 points higher ( https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text-to-image ). The tradeoff is latency, and ChatGPT Image 2 at High is...slow (~2 minutes at 1024x1024). In both cases it would have skewed the charts here to uselessness. I want to do a writeup on ChatGPT Image 2 but at this point I don&amp;#39;t think people care about nuanced image generation anymore...even…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.404media.co/henrico-virginia-datacenter-energy-cost-email/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;County with 37 Data Centers Asks Schools to &amp;#39;Conserve Electricity&amp;#39;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (404media.co)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48734699&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;423 points · 188 comments · by 01-_-&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Henrico County, Virginia, has advised school and government employees to conserve electricity as officials anticipate a 25% spike in energy costs driven by the area&amp;#39;s rapid expansion as a major data center hub. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.404media.co/henrico-virginia-datacenter-energy-cost-email/&quot; title=&quot;Title: County With 37 Data Centers Asks Schools to ‘Conserve Electricity’    URL Source: https://www.404media.co/henrico-virginia-datacenter-energy-cost-email/    Published Time: 2026-06-30T15:49:10.000Z    Markdown Content:  Listen to the [404 Media Podcast](https://www.404media.co/the-404-media-podcast/)    [](https://www.404media.co/henrico-virginia-datacenter-energy-cost-email/)    ###### Account    *   [Log in](https://www.404media.co/signin/)  *   [Subscribe](https://www.404media.co/signup/)    ######…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The surge in data center construction has sparked a debate over whether these facilities are the primary cause of rising electricity costs and grid instability, or if the blame lies with underinvestment in transmission and the transition to renewable energy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48735479&quot; title=&quot;This is in Virgina, which passed the Virginia Clean Economy Act in 2020. This mandated that Dominion (the power company) transition to 100% renewable energy by 2045. Personally, I think this is a good thing in the long run, but in the short run, it means that Dominion has had to invest a lot in building out renewable projects that haven&amp;#39;t come online yet. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab recently did an analysis on electricity prices in the US   [1] and found that most of the  rate increase in…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736195&quot; title=&quot;Do you have evidence that they are the problem. The research suggests otherwise. From some of the regional grids I have looked at the bigger problem has been lack of continued investment in transmission and generation. Even now I see so much push back for solar farms. People are their own worst enemy.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736321&quot; title=&quot;I only skimmed because what I saw was either no evidence or low. They to touched on demand but not immediately the correlation to price which is hard to connect without supply and other mechanics that go into different electric grid geographies. This feels very similar to the water argument or the anti-solar farm crowd. Lots of emotions and not as many facts. I am going to lean on the original research link.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Some argue that data centers should not be permitted until clean energy capacity is sufficient to meet their massive demands without burdening retail ratepayers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48735854&quot; title=&quot;So don&amp;#39;t allow data centers to connect until enough clean energy has been brought online to meet their needs without impacting cost or availability for retail ratepayers. It&amp;#39;s easy really. Say no. It&amp;#39;s so strange to me that the argument previously was &amp;#39;we don&amp;#39;t have enough energy generation for EVs and heat pumps to electrify and decarbon&amp;#39; but data centers are thought of as must run load that everyone has to suffer in some way to enable (through increased rates or risk of blackouts), when they…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48735994&quot; title=&quot;The greed with which the tech companies and data center providers are consuming electricity will be their downfall. By trying to make a few extra bucks by passing on some of the costs to consumers, it will trigger a huge political backlash that will screw them all. The fact they don&amp;#39;t realize this is greed and hubris on their part.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, others point out that regions without new data centers have seen even steeper rate hikes, suggesting that load growth from tech infrastructure can actually help mitigate price increases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48735479&quot; title=&quot;This is in Virgina, which passed the Virginia Clean Economy Act in 2020. This mandated that Dominion (the power company) transition to 100% renewable energy by 2045. Personally, I think this is a good thing in the long run, but in the short run, it means that Dominion has had to invest a lot in building out renewable projects that haven&amp;#39;t come online yet. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab recently did an analysis on electricity prices in the US   [1] and found that most of the  rate increase in…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48734962&quot; title=&quot;Interestingly, San Francisco has built no more of these AI datacenters and has seen a rate hike larger than that over the last few years. If we could at least get a few more datacenters that would be nice considering the rate hikes approved here.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also skepticism regarding the efficacy of asking schools or individuals to conserve power, as such savings are negligible compared to the scale of industrial consumption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48734897&quot; title=&quot;If everyone turned off their lights 100% of the time they left their workstation, they could power those additional data centers for about one second.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48735158&quot; title=&quot;not to mention you&amp;#39;ll get much farther, faster &amp;amp; easier with timers on the lights than some sort of 100% voluntary participation dream.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://unix.foo/posts/last-people-who-know-how-it-works/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;We Are the Last People Who Know How It Works&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (unix.foo)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48735633&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;333 points · 269 comments · by cylo&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cyrus Lopez argues that the shift toward frictionless AI and user-friendly interfaces is ending the era of technical intimacy, where users truly understood computers by overcoming their difficulties, leaving future generations more dependent on machines they can no longer deeply know. &lt;a href=&quot;https://unix.foo/posts/last-people-who-know-how-it-works/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Last People Who Know How It Works · unix.foo    URL Source: https://unix.foo/posts/last-people-who-know-how-it-works/    Published Time: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 23:30:54 GMT    Markdown Content:  You only ever know the things you can lose to.    FILED 2026-06-26 WORDS 773 READ 4 MIN BY CYRUS LOPEZ    To play a computer game in in the 1990s, you first had to understand how the computer worked.    So you learned. You opened files like `autoexec.bat` and you read them. Sometimes you built a boot disk for a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether current generations are uniquely positioned as the last to understand the foundational mechanics of technology before they are fully obscured by abstraction and AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48737000&quot; title=&quot;The issue with this is that we don&amp;#39;t know how it works. Generally speaking, we know how the level of abstraction that we were born with works. We might have some understanding of one or two previous levels, but that decreases the farther down you go. We might understand the next level, and some of the next after that, but eventually people will be making things that we don&amp;#39;t have the context to understand without having to unlearn a lot of what we know now. I&amp;#39;m old enough to see this process in…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736687&quot; title=&quot;It is no small feat to put in words that we are losing something almost as quickly as we are gaining something. The undertone, despite leaning into nostalgia boils down to losing control and this uneasiness I feel growing daily. It is already shocking to a certain degree seeing very young people not being able to use a computer in the narrow sense because all they ever learned was touch interfaces and apps. Curated content, curated interfaces -  everything that resembles some kind of hardship…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that formal education still provides deep technical grounding &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48737230&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The issue with this is that we don&amp;#39;t know how it works. Generally speaking, we know how the level of abstraction that we were born with works. What? Definitely not. I went to university and my first two years were subjects where I had to understand really deep levels of abstractions. I had to build logic gates, I had to work with hardware, wires, etc. I didnt see the point back then (I never used any of that professionally). The same about algorithms, databases, and a lot of things. But now I…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the shift toward curated interfaces and non-deterministic AI tools is eroding essential problem-solving skills and the ability to &amp;#34;RTFM&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736687&quot; title=&quot;It is no small feat to put in words that we are losing something almost as quickly as we are gaining something. The undertone, despite leaning into nostalgia boils down to losing control and this uneasiness I feel growing daily. It is already shocking to a certain degree seeing very young people not being able to use a computer in the narrow sense because all they ever learned was touch interfaces and apps. Curated content, curated interfaces -  everything that resembles some kind of hardship…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48737572&quot; title=&quot;I do think there&amp;#39;s something to be said for the big difference in the current abstraction layer jump - the loss of determinism. It is meaningfully different.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48737041&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m one of the greybeards who has the 2400 BAUD modem negotiation tone sequences emblazened in my neurons. For a while I&amp;#39;ve been meaning to set up some Wireguard connections among some of my systems. Being as busy as I am with work and family, I&amp;#39;ve relinquished that to Tailscale for now. Sure, I could have sat down and jumped through the hoops to get everything set up and working across my various hosts, including network routes, firewall rules, key pairs, systemd units, and so forth. But the…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Skeptics, however, view this anxiety as a recurring generational trope, noting that every era eventually abandons obsolete &amp;#34;esoteric knowledge&amp;#34; in favor of more efficient tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48737000&quot; title=&quot;The issue with this is that we don&amp;#39;t know how it works. Generally speaking, we know how the level of abstraction that we were born with works. We might have some understanding of one or two previous levels, but that decreases the farther down you go. We might understand the next level, and some of the next after that, but eventually people will be making things that we don&amp;#39;t have the context to understand without having to unlearn a lot of what we know now. I&amp;#39;m old enough to see this process in…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736848&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It is already shocking to a certain degree seeing very young people not being able to use a vehicle in the narrow sense because all they ever learned were the mechanical controls of the so-called automobile. We could do this forever.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48737296&quot; title=&quot;Exactly. Please get used to this sort of depressive, absurd and out of touch tone from HNers, it’s literally all they do now. Don’t bother calling people here hackers anymore, they have checked out emotionally and spiritually.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://docs.mistral.ai/models/model-cards/leanstral-1-5-26-06&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Leanstral 1.5&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (docs.mistral.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48738938&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;309 points · 149 comments · by vetronauta&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mistral AI has released Leanstral 1.5, an updated formal proof engineering model optimized for Lean 4 automated theorem proving and autoformalization, featuring 119 billion total parameters and a 256k context window. &lt;a href=&quot;https://docs.mistral.ai/models/model-cards/leanstral-1-5-26-06&quot; title=&quot;Title: Leanstral 1.5 - Mistral AI    URL Source: https://docs.mistral.ai/models/model-cards/leanstral-1-5-26-06    Markdown Content:  [](https://docs.mistral.ai/)Docs &amp;amp; API    Search docs    ⌘K    [Getting Started](https://docs.mistral.ai/)[Models](https://docs.mistral.ai/models)[Products](https://docs.mistral.ai/products)[Developers](https://docs.mistral.ai/developers)[Admin](https://docs.mistral.ai/admin)[API](https://docs.mistral.ai/api)    Search docs    ⌘K    Toggle theme[Reach…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a frustrating user experience with Mistral&amp;#39;s platform, leading to a critique of AI companies failing to use their own technology for customer support &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48742312&quot; title=&quot;Got curious, sign up, add money to account, try to use. Can&amp;#39;t, it&amp;#39;s a labs model. Fine, let&amp;#39;s enable labs. Can&amp;#39;t, unspecified error. Fine, lets contact customer support as instructed, can&amp;#39;t no customer support, just a half-assed FAQ, that seems vibe-coded and searched poorly, totally irrelevant answers coming up for all queries tried. Then it hit me: If AI makes good customer support, then why does no AI company use theirs to provide customer support?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. This sparked a heated debate over European work culture, with some users criticizing the &amp;#34;negligence&amp;#34; of long summer vacations that stall projects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48743772&quot; title=&quot;I laughed and cried at this comment. It&amp;#39;s so uncannily EU. Just spent 18 months landing an EU enterprise contract. Signed today and sent it back and got an automated message &amp;#39;sorry will be on vacation til end of July...&amp;#39; This is the fourth vacation emails I got since corresponding with this contact window for the past 1 year.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48744940&quot; title=&quot;I am German living in Germany and yes, I think not organizing a holiday replacement when you leave for more than a week is a sign of negligence and indifference; but unfortunately, it becomes more and more common to behave in that way. Many projects don&amp;#39;t make any progress between mid of June and late August, depending on the number and diversity of stakeholders. I&amp;#39;d like to declare these ~10 weeks &amp;#39;individual contribution weeks&amp;#39; in which no one is allowed to do anything that needs the…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48745080&quot; title=&quot;it&amp;#39;s because there is no incentive in general in EU to be excellent at your job. good or bad, you get the same pay, and dont get compensated for bringing extra value to the company so naturally employees have a &amp;#39;fuck you&amp;#39; attitude&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, while others defend these labor standards as a necessary rejection of &amp;#34;inhuman&amp;#34; work-centric lifestyles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48744523&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; narcissism and selfishness that is utterly indifferent to the needs of others This has to be rage bait right? What kind of hellscape do you live in where other humans taking vacation and wanting that to be respected is selfish? And how do you not realize the irony in what you&amp;#39;re complaining about? Do you never take a vacation where you actually disconnect from your work?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48745071&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Many projects don&amp;#39;t make any progress between mid of June and late August, depending on the number and diversity of stakeholders That&amp;#39;s what, less than 8 weeks, in a year of 52 weeks, where things progress slower, and this is supposedly a big issue? And even if you know and understand that these other people are humans too, just like you, this is seen as &amp;#39;narcissism&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;selfishness&amp;#39;, that they take vacations in the summer? I&amp;#39;m sorry but this is borderline insane and inhuman, do you never…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Skepticism also exists regarding Mistral’s actual performance, with users questioning if its adoption is driven by objective metrics or merely a desire for EU-based sovereignty in a US-dominated market &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48740418&quot; title=&quot;Real talk, does anyone use anything from Mistral because it performs the best, by whatever secular metric of your choosing? Or is it only used &amp;#39;because EU&amp;#39;? Just focus on answering the question. I wonder if anyone has observed it perform better on any objective metric in any rigorous setting.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48743390&quot; title=&quot;Tangential, but I&amp;#39;m pretty sad about EU having absolutely nothing in the actual SotA LLM market. Especially given the recent events of US completely restricting the actual SotA models. Has this been just pure lack of funding and infra?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48745093&quot; title=&quot;you are correct but its also the reason for the lack of EU tech capability and over-reliance on US&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.knopper.net/knoppix/index-en.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Knoppix&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (knopper.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48732056&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;338 points · 119 comments · by hoangvmpc&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KNOPPIX is a bootable GNU/Linux live system that runs entirely from a CD, DVD, or USB drive without installation, featuring automatic hardware detection and preinstalled software for data rescue and productivity. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.knopper.net/knoppix/index-en.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Live Linux Filesystem On CD    URL Source: https://www.knopper.net/knoppix/index-en.html    Markdown Content:  | **English Version** | | --- | Visit english version of this website.    | **Deutsche Version** | | --- | Zur deutschen Version dieser Webseite.    | **Main** | | --- | Back to Knopper.Net    | **About us** | | --- | About KNOPPER.NET: * Who we are * What can we do for you? * How to reach us    | **projects &amp;amp; coaching** | | --- | * Software Projects * Analysis and Consulting * Software…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Knoppix is remembered as a &amp;#34;game changer&amp;#34; for its ability to run Linux directly from a CD, providing a safe environment for teenagers to tinker without destroying family PC partitions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48735008&quot; title=&quot;When I was a kid I got obsessed with Linux, but my family only had one PC in the living room. After an attempt to set up Windows/Linux dual boot where I messed up the partition table, my parents banned me from tinkering with it. Luckily I discovered Knoppix and other live distros, which allowed me to boot into a safe environment to play around in.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48734816&quot; title=&quot;Fun to see this on the front page. I&amp;#39;m curious if ops intent was to share something cool is trigger a bunch of nostalgia because they definitely did the latter. I remember using this when it first came out. It was a game changer for doing forensics back before full disk encryption was a common thing.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48733924&quot; title=&quot;Knoppix 1.0 is still my first experience of linux that worked right out of the box.  Forever gave me a fondness for live CD/DVD booting.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Users frequently utilized it as a critical rescue tool for data recovery, hardware troubleshooting, and bypassing locked-down school computers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48733635&quot; title=&quot;I had knoppix running at the time. It was my first experience of a Live CD. which was cool as I could run it I&amp;#39;m sure it was a pentium 100 with 16meg and 800MB hdd.     or maybe it was later on my Pentium II with 128Meg and 6.4GB Fireball! Either way I used it a good few times to rescue data and generally fiddle with all sort of pcs from this era. (late 90&amp;#39;s to early 2000&amp;#39;)&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48733553&quot; title=&quot;In Grade 10  we&amp;#39;d pass around a Knoppix CD in the computer lab to boot up into something a bit more useful than the  &amp;#39;Student Vista&amp;#39; locked down Windows XP machines. I remember there being a sliding puzzle game in the theme of assembling molecules. I remember this because I remember a very classic argument between two teenagers over &amp;#39;propene&amp;#39; being a typo of &amp;#39;propane&amp;#39; vs. being an actual chemical. If only they were sitting in front of a device that could help them find the answer.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48733817&quot; title=&quot;Same. Back then we weren&amp;#39;t booting off USB memory sticks: CDs it was. Knoppix and memtest to troubleshoot friends and family&amp;#39;s PCs were my go-to tools. Always had a few bootable CD roms in the car. Heck I&amp;#39;d even take a HDD with me and wouldn&amp;#39;t hesitate to open other people&amp;#39;s PC and hook my &amp;#39;rescue HDD&amp;#39;. Worst memory ever troubleshooting a friend&amp;#39;s PC was in the 386 or 486 days (didn&amp;#39;t have Knoppix yet but was already on Slackware): he asked me to backup his files and I hooked one of my HDD as…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48735490&quot; title=&quot;I remember also hosing the bootloader somehow on my first try of Linux, luckily my personal desktop so no collatoral damage! After that I always had a CD wallet thing with copies of sysresccd and supergrubdisk and others (including I think an old knoppix cd from a linux magazine).&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate its lineage—specifically its relationship to security distros like Kali Linux—the consensus highlights its role as a &amp;#34;trial by fire&amp;#34; that launched many professional careers in tech &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48733395&quot; title=&quot;Isn&amp;#39;t this what eventually became Kali linux? I remember Knoppix and Whoppix then I didn&amp;#39;t really check on the projects for a while then Kali came along&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736012&quot; title=&quot;At one point in the very early 2000s my HDD failed and I was diskless for a while. I used Knoppix to be able to run things using a floppy to store my configs.  I&amp;#39;ve been using Linux as daily driver ever since. The necessity to do a trial by fire made me pretty good at it and helped me in my professional life as well. Thank you Knoppix.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable anecdotes include a user accidentally short-circuiting a friend&amp;#39;s exposed hard drive against a metallic case and students arguing over chemistry terminology while using the OS in a computer lab &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48733553&quot; title=&quot;In Grade 10  we&amp;#39;d pass around a Knoppix CD in the computer lab to boot up into something a bit more useful than the  &amp;#39;Student Vista&amp;#39; locked down Windows XP machines. I remember there being a sliding puzzle game in the theme of assembling molecules. I remember this because I remember a very classic argument between two teenagers over &amp;#39;propene&amp;#39; being a typo of &amp;#39;propane&amp;#39; vs. being an actual chemical. If only they were sitting in front of a device that could help them find the answer.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48733817&quot; title=&quot;Same. Back then we weren&amp;#39;t booting off USB memory sticks: CDs it was. Knoppix and memtest to troubleshoot friends and family&amp;#39;s PCs were my go-to tools. Always had a few bootable CD roms in the car. Heck I&amp;#39;d even take a HDD with me and wouldn&amp;#39;t hesitate to open other people&amp;#39;s PC and hook my &amp;#39;rescue HDD&amp;#39;. Worst memory ever troubleshooting a friend&amp;#39;s PC was in the 386 or 486 days (didn&amp;#39;t have Knoppix yet but was already on Slackware): he asked me to backup his files and I hooked one of my HDD as…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://noyb.eu/en/us-supreme-court-just-blew-eu-us-data-transfers&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;US Supreme Court Just Blew Up EU-US Data Transfers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (noyb.eu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48728740&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;259 points · 194 comments · by tomwas54&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Following a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that the FTC is no longer an independent agency, privacy advocates are calling on the European Commission to repeal the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, as EU law strictly requires independent oversight for international personal data transfers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://noyb.eu/en/us-supreme-court-just-blew-eu-us-data-transfers&quot; title=&quot;Title: US Supreme Court just blew up EU-US Data Transfers    URL Source: https://noyb.eu/en/us-supreme-court-just-blew-eu-us-data-transfers    Published Time: 2026-06-29T23:28:56+0200    Markdown Content:  **On Monday, the US Supreme Court decided in Trump v. Slaughter that the US Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) may not be independent anymore. Since 2000, the EU has relied on the “independent” FTC as the enforcer of EU-US deals on personal data. According to EU treaty law, such oversight must be…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a growing tension between EU privacy standards and US data practices, with some arguing that Europe must stop relying on regulation and instead build its own sovereign data infrastructure to compete &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48729731&quot; title=&quot;The EU keeps trying to manifest the missing european data infrastructure via data regulation instead of outright bans and limits on american companies, the way China did it.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48728874&quot; title=&quot;As a European citizen I do not trust entities located in the US to not abuse my private data ever since the patriot act. If it was me that deal would have never came to be. If some EU entity decides to use Microsoft 365 can Microsoft guarantee that it won&amp;#39;t give access to one US government agency or another? It really can&amp;#39;t. Because if that EU entity wants to act in accordance with EU law, this matters. This is what that deal was for. Basically the EU saying &amp;#39;it is okay&amp;#39; although it never…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters call for aggressive decoupling or protectionist measures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48729870&quot; title=&quot;The EU should cut all ties with the US, tax US products and impose costly (and difficult to get) visas to American citizens wanting to visit. It won&amp;#39;t do any of this because it has no balls and no vision. We&amp;#39;re doomed and it&amp;#39;s our fault.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48729700&quot; title=&quot;Doing business with the US is just impossible these days. If this trend continues any further the US is gonna end up a piranha state with no allies and no business partners. I&amp;#39;m really not sure what consequences that&amp;#39;ll have for the rest of the world, but it looks like we&amp;#39;re about to find out&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that European alternatives often struggle to compete due to strong worker protections or a lack of technical scale &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48729869&quot; title=&quot;Switching to EU companies is often the solution, but also we&amp;#39;re in a tricky position in Europe since alternatives exist but can&amp;#39;t compete with US. So finding European alternatives is possible but hard. Also EU is doing its job enforcing privacy and anti-competition laws but then American companies just say &amp;#39;feature not available in EU&amp;#39; (like Apple is doing more and more for example), making things even harder to switch.  Like nick mentioned, even EU official sites use CloudFront so it&amp;#39;s a tricky…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48729822&quot; title=&quot;Ban, limits, and regulation won’t solve a country with too many worker protections. The EU simply can’t compete in the modern globalized world.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant challenge remains the deep integration of US services into European life, evidenced by even official EU websites relying on American providers like Amazon &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48729869&quot; title=&quot;Switching to EU companies is often the solution, but also we&amp;#39;re in a tricky position in Europe since alternatives exist but can&amp;#39;t compete with US. So finding European alternatives is possible but hard. Also EU is doing its job enforcing privacy and anti-competition laws but then American companies just say &amp;#39;feature not available in EU&amp;#39; (like Apple is doing more and more for example), making things even harder to switch.  Like nick mentioned, even EU official sites use CloudFront so it&amp;#39;s a tricky…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48729826&quot; title=&quot;Europa, the official web portal of the tech sovereign European Union, will have to change their CDN provider (Amazon&amp;#39;s CloudFront). https://europa.eu&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ngrok.com/blog/i-ported-kubernetes-to-the-browser&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I ported Kubernetes to the browser&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ngrok.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48738985&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;335 points · 102 comments · by peterdemin&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A developer has successfully ported Kubernetes to run directly in the browser using a project called Webernetes, which is now available as an open-source repository and live demo. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ngrok.com/blog/i-ported-kubernetes-to-the-browser&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;github.com&amp;amp;#x2F;ngrok&amp;amp;#x2F;webernetes&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;github.com&amp;amp;#x2F;ngrok&amp;amp;#x2F;webernetes&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;webernetes-demo.ngrok.app&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;webernetes-demo.ngrok.app&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether the project constitutes a true &amp;#34;port&amp;#34; or a simulation, with critics arguing that &amp;#34;porting&amp;#34; implies functional parity—such as running actual container images—rather than just a UI for monitoring &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48740607&quot; title=&quot;1. It&amp;#39;s not really running containers in the browser, right? It seems every service would need a custom connector - and more importantly... 2. ...would need a renderer, right? Otherwise what does it mean to be &amp;#39;ported to the browser&amp;#39;? To use an analogy - if somebody ported DOOM to the browser, that means I can now play it in the browser. But I can&amp;#39;t really run those databases that it shows in the browser tab, can I? I couldn&amp;#39;t say spin up ruby2d and suddenly have client-side Ruby support. It…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48740710&quot; title=&quot;Right, that&amp;#39;s what I thought - still very cool! Just a misleading title, I think. It&amp;#39;s not &amp;#39;k8s ported to the browser&amp;#39; so much as a web based monitoring tool. Looks great, btw.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48740778&quot; title=&quot;Sure - but to use another analogy... If someone said they &amp;#39;ported git to the browser&amp;#39; but it was just a UI for git workflows it would be equally misleading. I think because that isn&amp;#39;t what &amp;#39;porting&amp;#39; is. In such a case I would expect git - the version control code and diffing - running in browser JavaScript in the same way DOOM is when someone says they ported DOOM to the browser. That&amp;#39;s what porting means, right? Since there are k8s bindings written in languages like Node.js (effectively a…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Supporters contend that the project is a legitimate port of the Kubernetes control plane (scheduler, proxy, and controllers) transliterated from Go, noting that orchestration, not container execution, is the core capability of Kubernetes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48740653&quot; title=&quot;Your points are addressed in the post just not in the title. It’s not running real container images. Maybe a better idea is simulated Kubernetes. What’s ported is the control plane: scheduler, kube-proxy, deployment controller, etc, transliterated from the actual Go source and tested against k3s for behavioral parity using the same client API. The “rendering” is the demo app visualizing pod-to-pod requests as moving dots.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48741123&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think this analogy holds. Version control and diffing are some core capabilities of git. Sam lists core capabilities of k8s that his port can handle: pod lifecycles, container garbage collection, IP allocation, etc. My understanding is that the interesting part of k8s is how it orchestrates containers, which this port can do a lot of. Your comments imply that a core component of k8s is actually running containers (rather than orchestrating them), but I don&amp;#39;t think that&amp;#39;s right. That…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, while the work is praised for its complexity and educational value, some maintain the title is misleading because it cannot run standard backend services like a database &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48740607&quot; title=&quot;1. It&amp;#39;s not really running containers in the browser, right? It seems every service would need a custom connector - and more importantly... 2. ...would need a renderer, right? Otherwise what does it mean to be &amp;#39;ported to the browser&amp;#39;? To use an analogy - if somebody ported DOOM to the browser, that means I can now play it in the browser. But I can&amp;#39;t really run those databases that it shows in the browser tab, can I? I couldn&amp;#39;t say spin up ruby2d and suddenly have client-side Ruby support. It…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48740721&quot; title=&quot;I don’t want to come across as diminishing OPs work. But it was alot of work to simulate what Kubernetes is doing.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48741243&quot; title=&quot;To me the interesting part is the use case. To call it a port that doesn’t actually work? Idk seems like a baseline requirement. It’s like saying you ported YouTube to a calculator but it doesn’t play videos because the most interesting part is the search algorithm, and it’s for educational purposes not functionality. That just isn’t a port.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://longcat.chat/blog/longcat-2.0/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LongCat-2.0, a large-scale MoE model with 1.6T total and 48B Active&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (longcat.chat)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48727116&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;279 points · 87 comments · by benjiro29&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LongCat-2.0 is an open-source, 1.6-trillion-parameter MoE language model trained on AI ASIC superpods with 1M-context capabilities. It introduces architectural innovations like Sparse Attention and N-gram Embeddings to deliver high-performance coding and agentic task execution comparable to leading proprietary models. &lt;a href=&quot;https://longcat.chat/blog/longcat-2.0/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Introducing LongCat-2.0    URL Source: https://longcat.chat/blog/longcat-2.0/    Markdown Content:  [![Image 1: LongCat](https://s3.meituan.net/static-prod01/com.sankuai.friday.longcat.next2/assets/longcat_logo-X5K_hpNA.svg)](https://longcat.chat/)    2026-06-30    [GitHub](https://github.com/meituan-longcat/LongCat-2.0)[HuggingFace](https://huggingface.co/meituan-longcat/LongCat-2.0)[Try it](https://longcat.chat/)[API Access](https://longcat.chat/platform/docs/)    We are introducing and open…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LongCat-2.0, a 1.6T parameter MoE model from Chinese food delivery giant Meituan, has drawn attention for being trained on large-scale AI ASIC clusters rather than Nvidia GPUs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48727625&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The training and deployment of LongCat-2.0 are built on large-scale clusters of tens of thousands of AI ASIC superpods. Compared to the mature Nvidia GPU ecosystem, the supporting software community is still less developed. We have therefore put significant effort into building a stable, secure, and scalable infrastructure. This is the real news story. It looks like they may have used Huawei Ascend 910C chips: https://nitter.net/teortaxesTex/status/2071708141037781407#m&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48728072&quot; title=&quot;Apparently this comes from Meituan which is a Chinese food delivery company.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48728529&quot; title=&quot;If they really managed this from pre-training a 1.6 T parameter model through to post-training without NVIDIA, Dwarkesh Patel got what he wanted.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While its scale is massive, initial testing on niche nuclear physics questions suggests it may lag behind competitors like Gemini Flash and Qwen in reasoning accuracy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48727816&quot; title=&quot;I just tested it with a slightly tricky question &amp;gt; If you could run a nuclear reactor with U-235 as fuel or Pu-241 (both mixed with 95% U-238), which one would you choose and why? For a human this would not be tricky at all. For an LLM it could be, because this question certainly does not exist in any sort of training, because Pu-241 does not exist in pure form, it only exist as a minor component of reactor-grade plutonium, where Pu-239 would dominate, with Pu-240 coming second and Pu-241…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, the model&amp;#39;s immense size—estimated at 400GB even at low quantization—makes it impractical for common hardware, and official weights have yet to be released &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48727907&quot; title=&quot;I wish they would release the requirements to run on llama.cpp with any announcements of open models. A bonus would be tok/s on common hardware.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48728046&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think llama.cpp supports any of the LongCat models, actually. They haven&amp;#39;t posted weights/inference solutions for LongCat-2.0 [1], but LongCat-Next had transformers support, which I assume means it works with vLLM/SGLang. Given it&amp;#39;s 1.6T, &amp;#39;common hardware&amp;#39; is probably out of the question; even 2bpw is going to measure out at 400GB, even before considering the bandwidth requirements for 48B active. I haven&amp;#39;t read the LongCat-2.0 architecture docs, but if you&amp;#39;re not running GLM-5.2,…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.maturitas.org/article/S0378-5122(25)00571-7/fulltext&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Exercise intensity influences body composition in healthy older adults (2025)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (maturitas.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48730694&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;195 points · 168 comments · by bookofjoe&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A six-month study of healthy older adults found that only high-intensity interval training (HIIT) reduced fat mass while maintaining lean muscle, whereas moderate-intensity exercise led to muscle loss. While HIIT was most effective for overall body composition, the average changes were small and not considered clinically meaningful. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.maturitas.org/article/S0378-5122(25)00571-7/fulltext&quot; title=&quot;Title: Exercise intensity influences body composition: a 6-month comparison of high-intensity interval, moderate- and low-intensity training among healthy older adults    URL Source: https://www.maturitas.org/article/S0378-5122(25)00571-7/fulltext    Markdown Content:  ## Highlights    •    Only high-intensity interval training reduced fat mass while maintaining lean mass.    •    Moderate-intensity training reduced fat mass but also caused declines in lean mass.    •    Both moderate- and high-intensity…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the study suggests high-intensity interval training (HIIT) helps older adults maintain lean mass better than low-intensity exercise, commenters emphasize that the results were not &amp;#34;clinically meaningful&amp;#34; and focused solely on cardio rather than resistance training &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48731120&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; “High-intensity training reduced fat and maintained lean mass […] though changes were small and not clinically meaningful compared with exercise of lower intensity…” High intensity does border on leading to injury — just making the wrong move — and you’re back to zero intensity?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48731714&quot; title=&quot;I think it&amp;#39;s important to note that this study, at least to my understanding, compared cardio training - not weightlifting or resistance training. Participants did 3 weekly sessions of either low intensity, moderate treadmill excercise or HIIT ( 4-min @ 85–95%, 3min 60-70% ). I get the feeling some commenters here are misunderstanding this as a lot of the discussions seems to center about weightlifting. Additionally from what I understood the biggest difference was that the HIIT group lost less…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant point of contention is the risk-to-reward ratio, as users note that high intensity can frequently lead to injuries that halt progress entirely &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48731120&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; “High-intensity training reduced fat and maintained lean mass […] though changes were small and not clinically meaningful compared with exercise of lower intensity…” High intensity does border on leading to injury — just making the wrong move — and you’re back to zero intensity?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48731187&quot; title=&quot;No joke. I go to the gym a couple times a week so that I&amp;#39;ll maintain mobility and won&amp;#39;t injure myself as I age - unfortunately 80% of my injuries come from the gym.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these risks, some argue the findings support a broader shift in geriatric health toward recommending more strenuous activity over traditional &amp;#34;gentle&amp;#34; exercise to combat muscle loss &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48731043&quot; title=&quot;No, but past recommendations for older adults (note that the average age in the study was 72 years old) were towards &amp;#39;gentle&amp;#39; or moderate exercise. We&amp;#39;re seeing a shift now towards recommending real weight lifting and higher intensity as we age. (&amp;#39;Real&amp;#39; -&amp;gt; closer to powerlifting in terms of goals and methods)&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/google/copybara&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Google copybara: moving code between repositories&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48740698&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;299 points · 60 comments · by reconnecting&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Copybara is an open-source tool from Google designed to transform and move source code between repositories, commonly used to synchronize confidential and public codebases while maintaining a single authoritative source of truth. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/google/copybara&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - google/copybara: Copybara: A tool for transforming and moving code between repositories.    URL Source: https://github.com/google/copybara    Markdown Content:  _A tool for transforming and moving code between repositories._    Copybara is a tool used internally at Google. It transforms and moves code between repositories.    Often, source code needs to exist in multiple repositories, and Copybara allows you to transform and move source code between these repositories. A common case is a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Copybara is primarily used to sync code between internal monorepos and public repositories, allowing teams to maintain a single source of truth while meeting external release requirements &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48741561&quot; title=&quot;It’s largely used for syncing external open source projects with the monorepo. Policy is to require source code imports over built artifacts. Though you can get exceptions. Some projects are also developed in the monorepo and exported via Copybara. My team also uses it to version Starlark rule sets internally.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48742338&quot; title=&quot;The one-way pattern is actually how Google uses it internally too, syncing outward from their monorepo to GitHub. Bidirectional gets messy because transforms (path remapping, file exclusions, header stripping) are easy to apply in one direction but can&amp;#39;t always be cleanly inverted. When both sides have diverged, Copybara&amp;#39;s baseline tracking starts producing confusing results because semantically equivalent commits generate different SHAs after transform. One thing worth knowing: history…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48741565&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s for when you have a monorepo internally, and want to publish parts of it as open source to the world. They still need to live in the monorepo, so this is the solution. Having a public repo as a dependency for your private corporate repo is a pain in the ass development-wise. Having a tree of such dependencies is a migraine.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While it supports complex bidirectional workflows, users find one-way &amp;#34;fire and forget&amp;#34; exports more reliable because transforming code across repositories often breaks commit SHA consistency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48742190&quot; title=&quot;Been using this for a while, mostly when I make a tool as part of a larger project and the tool is big enough to deserve its own release. It’s powerful enough to do a whole bidirectional shipping operation where you export and import code—no thanks, that’s a hassle. I use it mostly for a simple fire and forget export, where I take a folder out of its original repo and preserve the history. Then I just move development to the new repo. The new project layout can be completely different, but Git…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48742338&quot; title=&quot;The one-way pattern is actually how Google uses it internally too, syncing outward from their monorepo to GitHub. Bidirectional gets messy because transforms (path remapping, file exclusions, header stripping) are easy to apply in one direction but can&amp;#39;t always be cleanly inverted. When both sides have diverged, Copybara&amp;#39;s baseline tracking starts producing confusing results because semantically equivalent commits generate different SHAs after transform. One thing worth knowing: history…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Some commenters argue that copying code is a &amp;#34;lazy&amp;#34; alternative to proper library extraction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48744499&quot; title=&quot;I get it that there are use-cases for this, but it&amp;#39;s surprising to learn that apparently use-case space is big enough for it to invite a creation of a dedicated tool. I mean that the fact you need it is a bit shameful on its own, no? Usually, when you need to reuse the code between the projects, you try to extract it as a separate library / module. The copying between repos is just a lazy solution, because &amp;#39;ain&amp;#39;t nobody got time for that&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, but others maintain it is a pragmatic solution for sharing domain models or avoiding the &amp;#34;migraine&amp;#34; of managing a complex tree of external dependencies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48741388&quot; title=&quot;To those who have used it: is it handy for situations where you have multiple repos that want to share a little code, but it&amp;#39;s not worth the trouble of extracting a library, referencing it, publishing versioned releases, updating dependent repos, etc? And instead just &amp;#39;sync&amp;#39; a code folder from one main repo (perhaps containing common domain models) to other repos? Basically the Go philosophy that a little bit of copying is better than a lot of dependency?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48741565&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s for when you have a monorepo internally, and want to publish parts of it as open source to the world. They still need to live in the monorepo, so this is the solution. Having a public repo as a dependency for your private corporate repo is a pain in the ass development-wise. Having a tree of such dependencies is a migraine.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Alternative tools mentioned for similar workflows include `git subtree`, Rust&amp;#39;s `josh`, and Meta&amp;#39;s now-archived `fbshipit` &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48741324&quot; title=&quot;Some other interesting tools in the space. Rust is using a tool called Josh to sync commits: https://josh-project.dev The blog post from the Rust people: https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2026/06/04/how-josh-h... Meta used to have an open source tool called fbshipit. But according to its open source repo they no longer use it: https://github.com/facebookarchive/fbshipit Any others in this space?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48743238&quot; title=&quot;git subtree was the OG tool: https://apenwarr.ca/log/20090430 It has since been merged into git proper: https://manpages.debian.org/testing/git-man/git-subtree.1.en... https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/using-git/about-git-s...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/world/crypto-firms-have-spent-189-million-so-far-2026-us-election-report-says-2026-06-30/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Crypto firms have spent $189M so far on 2026 US election, report says&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (reuters.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48735376&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;229 points · 111 comments · by tartoran&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/world/crypto-firms-have-spent-189-million-so-far-2026-us-election-report-says-2026-06-30/&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The crypto industry&amp;#39;s massive political spending is seen by some as a strategic move to back candidates who explicitly promise regulatory freedom or pardons for industry figures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736158&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not hard to figure out, the fascists have been more explicitly welcoming to crypto freedom or at least put themselves out there to solicit that vote even if you claim their underlying policies aren&amp;#39;t.  Trump offered the freedom of Ross Ulbricht at the libertarian convention, did Kamala come to the libertarian convention and offer anything?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue this influence-buying aligns &amp;#34;libertarian&amp;#34; interests with authoritarianism and allows the wealthy to drown out ordinary voters, effectively reviving a &amp;#34;Gilded Age&amp;#34; of robber barons &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736103&quot; title=&quot;I wonder why all the libertarian freedom loving crypto guys keep backing fascists&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48738214&quot; title=&quot;And as if to sprinkle salt on the wounds, the Supreme court today allowed unlimited spending by political parties &amp;#39;in coordination with allied interests(read the money class)&amp;#39; https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48734220 Moneyed interests have always jockeyed for power, but earlier they were held somewhat in check by Congress which had to listen somewhat to voters. With Citizens united in 2010 and corporate media driving polarization to new heights, big money has been able to drown out…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48735944&quot; title=&quot;The fact that political spending is considered free speech in the US gives the rich and already powerful massive sway in the political system, it is basically tiled hard towards them.  And then combined with how PACs hide their funding behind names like &amp;#39;Everyday Americans Making the World Better&amp;#39; when really it just wants to lessen online gambling laws for a billion dollar company, is just brutal.  US politics is a dystopian future realized.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some compare these firms to &amp;#34;vampire squids&amp;#34; for their aggressive lobbying, others point out that the actual return on investment has been poor, as politicians often take the money without delivering specific legislative favors or bailouts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48736042&quot; title=&quot;As far as the US is concerned, given how badly bitcoin has done since Trump was inaugurated, the worst performing asset class by far,  I would say the ROI has been pretty bad. Industries and sectors that donated nothing still got bailouts and other initiatives, such as AI, quantum, metals, and semiconductors. Noting for crypto donors. No bailouts, or even mentions on twitter. Politicians can take money but they don&amp;#39;t have to honor their end of the deal to give anything in return.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48735991&quot; title=&quot;Andreessen Horowitz - $51.65m... are they the Goldman Sachs (Vampire Squid) of the Tech world? The first thing you need to know about Goldman Sachs is that it’s everywhere. The world’s most powerful investment bank is a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money. https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/the-grea...&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.snowflake.com/en/blog/engineering/postgresql-19-features-beta/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Looking Ahead to Postgres 19&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (snowflake.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48733031&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;205 points · 120 comments · by thinkingemote&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The PostgreSQL 19 beta introduces several major updates, including built-in concurrent table repacking, SQL property graph queries (SQL/PGQ), and enhanced logical replication for sequences. The release also features smarter autovacuum prioritization, improved partition management, and various SQL quality-of-life enhancements to streamline database operations and performance. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.snowflake.com/en/blog/engineering/postgresql-19-features-beta/&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s New in Postgres 19: Beta Release Deep Dive    Discover the top PostgreSQL 19 features, including built-in REPACK CONCURRENTLY, SQL property graph queries (SQL/PGQ), and logical replication updates.    [Skip to content](#responsive-grid-main-content)    Product    Solutions    Why…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users praise PostgreSQL for its reliability but highlight critical missing features, specifically the lack of built-in columnar storage for large datasets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48734148&quot; title=&quot;Speaking as long-term (&amp;gt;15 years) user of Postgres in science, I am getting worried about the lack of columnar type of storage in Postgresql. As the datasets become bigger and bigger, the limitations of PG&amp;#39;s storage are becoming more and more significant. I know there are various extensions (i.e. cetus) that may offer such functionality, but then you depend on that extension being supported in the future, as well additional complexity.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48734468&quot; title=&quot;PostgreSQL was a right tool for my task for many years. It is a question for PostgreSQL can adapt to a new reality of much bigger datasets or I have to switch to a new tool. And I am not the only user of Postgresql in this context. So it is easy to say in vacuum &amp;#39;you are using the wrong database&amp;#39;, but it&amp;#39;s not something that can be easily changed with 100s of Tb of data, existing user workflows etc.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt; and the absence of synchronously updated &amp;#34;indexed views&amp;#34; found in SQL Server &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48733599&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve used Postgres, Oracle, MsSql Server, and MySql in serious projects, no extensive experience with Sqlite, which I know is an amazing player. These days, I do myself a favor and always avoid Oracle and MySql/MariaDB. Postgres is amazing, and the two big things I wished it had: 1. lightweight connection; connection bouncers improve the situation, but you still have an unreasonably high memory footprint per concurrent connection. 2. Synchronously updated materialized views (Sql Server calls…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48733842&quot; title=&quot;Care to share some examples where SQL Server&amp;#39;s indexed views would shine? In my eyes they&amp;#39;re similar to triggers, which incur a high performance overhead in OLTP systems and are shunned by developers. In OLAP systems custom ETL code will likely outperform them.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that columnar storage belongs in a separate database category &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48734218&quot; title=&quot;You might be using the wrong database if that’s what you’re hoping for. Columnar databases are a separate category. It’s like saying that you’re getting worried Apple doesn’t sell washing machines.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, long-term users note that migrating hundreds of terabytes to new tools is often impractical &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48734468&quot; title=&quot;PostgreSQL was a right tool for my task for many years. It is a question for PostgreSQL can adapt to a new reality of much bigger datasets or I have to switch to a new tool. And I am not the only user of Postgresql in this context. So it is easy to say in vacuum &amp;#39;you are using the wrong database&amp;#39;, but it&amp;#39;s not something that can be easily changed with 100s of Tb of data, existing user workflows etc.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, developers compare PostgreSQL to alternatives like SQLite for simplicity and SQL Server for superior tooling &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48733965&quot; title=&quot;SQLite and MSSQL are my two solutions for relational storage problems. If I am going to use a &amp;#39;free&amp;#39; provider, SQLite is impossible to beat. They cover a majority of use cases today. SQLite starts to fall apart with backup, replication and tooling. If I am on the hook for things like system availability and disaster recovery, I don&amp;#39;t have a problem spending money to cover my ass. If I am going to pay any amount of money at all, I am going all the way. The developer experience around MSSQL is…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, while expressing strong disdain for Oracle&amp;#39;s handling of empty strings as null values &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48734825&quot; title=&quot;And although you didn&amp;#39;t ask, I&amp;#39;ll list what&amp;#39;s wrong with Oracle. It&amp;#39;s very simple. Oracle treats empty strings as being NULL . Anyone who&amp;#39;s never used Oracle before in their life is probably wondering if I&amp;#39;m making it up. I&amp;#39;m not. In Oracle, inserting &amp;#39;&amp;#39; in a VARCHAR column is exactly the same as inserting NULL. And if there&amp;#39;s a NOT NULL column, you&amp;#39;re not allowed to store the empty string in there. Which means that in Oracle, you do not have any way of distinguishing &amp;#39;I don&amp;#39;t know the person&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-06-29</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-06-29</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://det.social/@lostgen/116820546568940358&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The CEO of Mullvad is the main financer of the Swedish Örebro party&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (det.social)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48717469&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;687 points · &lt;strong&gt;1578 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by Risse&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The CEO of Mullvad VPN is reportedly the primary financier of the Swedish Örebro party, providing over 70% of their funding to support the party&amp;#39;s nationwide expansion. &lt;a href=&quot;https://det.social/@lostgen/116820546568940358&quot; title=&quot;Title: Jörg Seidel (@lostgen@det.social)    URL Source: https://det.social/@lostgen/116820546568940358    Published Time: 2026-06-27T06:01:18Z    Markdown Content:  #### Recent searches    No recent searches    #### Search options    Only available when logged in.    **det.social** is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.    [![Image 1](https://det.social/system/site_uploads/files/000/000/005/@1x/980ec8c14497c55c.png)](https://det.social/about)    Mastodon…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discovery that a Mullvad co-founder finances the Örebro Party sparked debate over whether the organization is &amp;#34;far-right&amp;#34; or a populist mix of leftist economics and strict immigration policies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48721418&quot; title=&quot;Wikipedia of the party in question: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%96rebro_Party# Doesn&amp;#39;t really sound all that far-right to me. Nationalist, sure. I&amp;#39;m not Swedish though, so I would be interested in the thoughts of those who are actually affected by Örebropartiet&amp;#39;s policies.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48721804&quot; title=&quot;Spot the odd one out: &amp;gt; Some of its key issues include lowered wages for politicians, ending the tax payer funding of various sculptures, monuments and art, large scale remigration, a stricter immigration policy, and free dental care.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48688476&quot; title=&quot;Örebropartiet is not a extremist far-right party. All their policies is extreme far-left except immigration. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%96rebro_Party&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users condemn the party&amp;#39;s rhetoric regarding &amp;#34;parasites&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;remigration&amp;#34; as racist, others argue these views have moved toward the political center due to the perceived failures of mass migration &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722153&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Doesn&amp;#39;t really sound all that far-right to me. To me too, then I got to the leaders quote on TV: &amp;#39;We must deport these damn parasites who sit and live at our expense.&amp;#39; Yeah, okay. I know some politicians who speak like that, I feel I get the picture.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722828&quot; title=&quot;I think you&amp;#39;d be surprised at how quickly that sentiment has moved from the far-right to close to the center.  People are (rightly, in my opinion) pretty upset at their governments for letting mass migration happen with pretty much only downsides for their actual citizens.  People are all about the idea of helping the downtrodden when it&amp;#39;s just an ideal, but when they realize it&amp;#39;s having negative consequences for them that can easily change.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722614&quot; title=&quot;Slightly tangential on Swedish society, there are similarities between USA and Sweden. There&amp;#39;s a large segment of society that is white and very blond, and there&amp;#39;s a largish segment which is not. Along that same line there are all kinds of divisions: economic, education, religious, sets of values, and of access to things and possibilities. What pisses me off is that the cast of &amp;#39;CEOs of successful companies&amp;#39; live in an sphere of privilege where they really are not bothered at all by the brown…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Mullvad’s other co-founder clarified that the company remains a &amp;#34;political&amp;#34; entity focused strictly on privacy and free speech, asserting that personal donations do not reflect the firm&amp;#39;s mission or values &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696800&quot; title=&quot;Hi, Mullvad has two owners, founders, and CEOs - Daniel Berntsson, and me, Fredrik Strömberg. All posts I&amp;#39;ve seen yesterday and today, including the newspaper articles, talk about Mullvad as if Daniel is the single owner, founder and CEO. It should be obvious that Daniel&amp;#39;s private donation to a political party is not part of Mullvad&amp;#39;s values or mission. If you have any questions, comments or concerns you&amp;#39;re welcome to comment on this thread, or email our customer support. See below for the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://quesma.com/blog/qwen-36-is-awesome/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Qwen 3.6 27B is the sweet spot for local development&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (quesma.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48721903&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1190 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 757 comments · by stared&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Qwen 3.6 27B is emerging as a premier local AI model for developers, offering general intelligence and coding capabilities that rival previous frontier models while running efficiently on consumer hardware like MacBooks and NVIDIA GPUs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://quesma.com/blog/qwen-36-is-awesome/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Qwen 3.6 27B is the sweet spot for local development    URL Source: https://quesma.com/blog/qwen-36-is-awesome/    Published Time: 2026-06-29T10:34:14.302Z    Markdown Content:  I’ve been disappointed by local models in the past. But then I checked Qwen 3.6, and I was in awe. For me it’s the first local model that actually makes sense as a general intelligence.    It comes in two variants, a mixture-of-experts model [Qwen 3.6 35B A3B](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B), and a dense…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Qwen 3.6 27B is praised for local development, critics argue that the $6,700 MacBook Pro required to run it efficiently is a poor investment compared to using cloud credits or cheaper hardware like a Mac Mini or a used Nvidia 3090 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722381&quot; title=&quot;The article is based on running Qwen 3.6 on a 128GB MacBook Pro. For reference, a 128GB MBP currently starts at $6699 USD [0] Some people will be happy to pay that premium for privacy, but at roughly 10X the cost of a MacBook Neo, that money could also buy a lot of credits on OpenRouter or frontier labs. [0]: https://www.apple.com/shop/buy-mac/macbook-pro/14-inch-space...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48723879&quot; title=&quot;I love my MacBook Pro M5 128GB RAM and I love qwen3.6. BUT DO NOT buy this MacBook if you plan on doing serious coding using local LLMs with it. The reason is simple: your fingers will burn and your head will explode from the noise. Running any kind of sophisticated job on the very laptop you are using is just not viable. Sure you can use it in clamshell mode, but forget touching it while working with AI coding or agents. If you want to run Qwen3.6 27B / 35B at its best, get a MacMini M4 with…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48723980&quot; title=&quot;If you want to do coding with a local LLM your best bet is a 6 year old Nvidia 3090 which is substantially more powerful than the highest end overhyped Apple product for 1/5th the price.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Users report that running intensive models on a laptop causes extreme heat and noise, making a remote desktop setup more viable for &amp;#34;serious&amp;#34; work &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48723879&quot; title=&quot;I love my MacBook Pro M5 128GB RAM and I love qwen3.6. BUT DO NOT buy this MacBook if you plan on doing serious coding using local LLMs with it. The reason is simple: your fingers will burn and your head will explode from the noise. Running any kind of sophisticated job on the very laptop you are using is just not viable. Sure you can use it in clamshell mode, but forget touching it while working with AI coding or agents. If you want to run Qwen3.6 27B / 35B at its best, get a MacMini M4 with…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722951&quot; title=&quot;I feel like I&amp;#39;m going insane seeing people buy these 128gb MBP for thousands of dollars to run models that are objectively much worse than SOTA and spending so much more. The amount spent on a 128gb M5 MAX can buy you a damned new car here. What the hell am I missing? Are developers in other countries living in such different worlds? (I&amp;#39;m aware the price is, in absolute terms, more expensive where I live compared to the USA. That reinforces what I think, because anyone sane that would&amp;#39;ve bought…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these costs, some find local LLMs invaluable for private tinkering and learning the underlying technology without &amp;#34;jargon-drenched&amp;#34; confusion &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722567&quot; title=&quot;The maths there is pretty undeniable, but it is not where I&amp;#39;d make the split. Having a machine that can run some modest local LLMs, like the Gemma 4 12B, is really worth it. I don&amp;#39;t know how much serious hands-free agentic coding I will ever do on my MacBook alone, but I do know that I would not have got so far into understanding this without tinkering with local models, llama.cpp, LM Studio, and LM Studio and all that. I totally struggled to find the right frame of mind to explore any of this…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, though others maintain that local models remain &amp;#34;expensive toys&amp;#34; that underperform compared to SOTA cloud models on complex, existing codebases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48723252&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Having a machine that can run some modest local LLMs, like the Gemma 4 12B, is really worth it. Cloud models are (much) faster, they don&amp;#39;t consume so much power/generate heat, they have much bigger (LLM) context, they&amp;#39;re much more precise and they have a much wider (engineering) context of the given problem. Except privacy and use cases that are blocked by cloud models (e.g. reverse engineering), local LLMs are currently an expensive toy. When I try to program with a local LLM (I&amp;#39;m on a…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722311&quot; title=&quot;None of the examples reflect &amp;#39;real work&amp;#39;, at least not what I&amp;#39;d consider real work. Being able to nail a zero-shot greenfield project is relatively easy even for a small model. There&amp;#39;s not much context to build up and it can fall back to similar examples in the training data easily. So long as you&amp;#39;re not asking it to invent something wholly new it&amp;#39;ll probably manage. The real test is whether or not it can work with your existing codebases. In my limited experiments Qwen 3.5 (maybe 3.6 is loads…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nonogra.ph/age-verification-is-just-a-precursor-to-attribution-of-speech-06-29-2026&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Age verification is just a precursor to automated attribution of speech&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nonogra.ph)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48714529&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1019 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 632 comments · by arkhiver&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The article argues that government-mandated age verification laws are a strategic precursor to automated speech attribution, designed to link digital accounts to physical identities and facilitate the surveillance or prosecution of individuals for their online expression. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nonogra.ph/age-verification-is-just-a-precursor-to-attribution-of-speech-06-29-2026&quot; title=&quot;Title: Age verification is just a precursor to attribution of speech    URL Source: https://nonogra.ph/age-verification-is-just-a-precursor-to-attribution-of-speech-06-29-2026    Published Time: 2026-06-29T03:41:05.097862975+00:00    Markdown Content:  Lots of US states, European countries, and Australia have introduced &amp;#39;age verification&amp;#39; regulations. They present it as the classic &amp;#39;save the children&amp;#39; talking point, but it&amp;#39;s really just a precursor to attribution of speech, particularly attributing…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that age verification is a &amp;#34;slippery slope&amp;#34; toward authoritarian speech control, driven more by political agendas than public demand &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48714704&quot; title=&quot;If we taught systems thinking in schools things like internet age verification would never get past being an idea on the back of a napkin. People struggle to consider the second-, third-, and nth-order effects of anything so asking them to consider what else might happen if we bring in laws and technical mechanisms to &amp;#39;protect the children&amp;#39; is unfortunately too a big leap for a lot of them. Most people are bad at spotting causal links between parts of a system, and people who are good at it…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48714885&quot; title=&quot;In fairness, the evidence is that people already pretty firmly against things like chat control and the will to push it through tends to come from the political circles more than popular belief it is a good idea. I expect that if the measure itself went to a general vote, the majority would be against it once they have to deal with a specific proposal. It takes repeated pushes by the authoritarians looking for an opportunity to get things like speech controls or privacy violations through and…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48715110&quot; title=&quot;No, we have any number of social constructs around &amp;#39;age and responsibility&amp;#39; - driving, alcohol, pubs, porn, excessive violence and so much more. It&amp;#39;s bereft to suggest that we wouldn&amp;#39;t nominally have those in the digital world. And, people are concerned about nth order effects, it&amp;#39;s a huge point of debate. Yes - there is a huge slippery slope argument to be made, but it&amp;#39;s an argument ... to be made. There are all sorts of ways of doing this.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest that zero-knowledge proofs or decentralized platforms could mitigate privacy risks, others warn that governments are already framing privacy advocacy as an interest in illegal content &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48715332&quot; title=&quot;“Age verification” isn&amp;#39;t a problem in itself, the problem is how it&amp;#39;s done. They could issue a physical id card with a cryptographic chip and do the age verification in a zero-knowledge fashion and it would be perfectly fine. The problem is the lack of thinking about the solution and just handwaving “age verification” as a political posture, which is why we end up with half-baked systems.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48714771&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t like age verification. However I&amp;#39;m not concerned about it. The internet needs new spaces that are more decentralized and less in bed with governments. We already lost our freedom when we agreed to move from IRC to Discord, from phpBB to Reddit, etc. The teenagers who are blocked from mainstream social media will deliver us new free online spaces that are better than what they&amp;#39;re blocked from.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48715588&quot; title=&quot;I emailed my local TD minister in Ireland about the inherent dangers of chat control. They had some lacky respond with an email that framed the conversation in a way that made it look like I was interested in the illegal content and not privacy/control or nefarious future governments.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48715655&quot; title=&quot;This is what I fear the most. It is gas lighting and just manipulation. The idea of privacy will become associated with crime. Further down the line technical solutions that are private will become illegal and in general not being pro survailance will get you in trouble&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. A central tension exists between those who believe technical workarounds like cryptography are the answer and those who insist that only direct political engagement can prevent the normalization of surveillance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48714676&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Don&amp;#39;t let them win. Don&amp;#39;t verify your age. Don&amp;#39;t give up your identity. If you absolutely must, find one of the numerous age verification services and pay in Monero.&amp;#39; Better yet, how about - &amp;#39;call your representatives&amp;#39;? Some nerds, for lack of a better term, think crypto and cryptography are the answers to every privacy problem. The only way to fix society and the law is by engaging with those things. Not sidestepping them with cryptography, an unscalable approach in any case. I&amp;#39;m deeply…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48716311&quot; title=&quot;Do you acknowledge that for many people and practically e2ee and crime are connected? e2ee is a very useful tool for crime and combined with crypto useful tool for monetizing crime. Criminals used to speak in code, meet clandestine, use burner phones and websites were easy to shut down. Now they don&amp;#39;t need to. The solution to privacy problem is not to shout while closing your ears but to make it clear that you see their side, how new tech create new problems, and help solve it in least privacy…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://danunparsed.com/p/hackerrank-open-source-ats&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;HackerRank open sourced its ATS. My resume scored 90/100. Oh wait 74. No – 88&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (danunparsed.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48713832&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1028 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 433 comments · by sambellll&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HackerRank&amp;#39;s open-source Applicant Tracking System (ATS) produces highly inconsistent resume scores due to LLM non-determinism, with one test showing the same resume&amp;#39;s score fluctuating between 66 and 99 despite low temperature settings and detailed rubrics. &lt;a href=&quot;https://danunparsed.com/p/hackerrank-open-source-ats&quot; title=&quot;Title: HackerRank&amp;#39;s Open-Source ATS Gave My Resume a Different Score Every Time.    URL Source: https://danunparsed.com/p/hackerrank-open-source-ats    Published Time: 2026-06-28T13:07:21+00:00    Markdown Content:  This open-source ATS by HackerRank has been blowing up recently: [https://github.com/interviewstreet/hiring-agent](https://github.com/interviewstreet/hiring-agent)    [![Image 1: Star growth chart for interviewstreet/hiring-agent on GitHub, showing flat growth from October 2025 through May…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The use of LLMs for resume screening is criticized for its inherent stochasticity, with users noting that even low temperature settings do not guarantee deterministic results due to hardware-level floating point imprecisions and batching &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48715029&quot; title=&quot;An alarming number of people don&amp;#39;t understand that LLMs work via purely stochastic processes, so I&amp;#39;m happy to see in-depth pieces like this. I&amp;#39;m looking for a job and maybe this is why it&amp;#39;s so hard to get a callback these days: resumes are just dumped in some LLM black hole and no one really knows how it works. The author says: &amp;gt; temperature 0.1 — low, supposedly nudging the model toward deterministic outputs This is not correct (and is briefly touched on later in the piece when he sets…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48715797&quot; title=&quot;In theory, temperature 0 does make the LLM deterministic. Well, in theory theory, temperature 0 doesn&amp;#39;t really exist. Mathematically, as lim temperature-&amp;gt;0, the distribution gets spikier and spikier, the most likely sample goes to almost-but-not-quite infinity and the rest go to almost-but-not-quite 0. In practice, temperature=0 is literally a separate branch of an if statement that just picks the most common sample (using the actual formula that works for non-zero values would cause a zero…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48715329&quot; title=&quot;A distribution with all probability mass on one outcome is deterministic, so in principle, setting temperature to 0 _should_ result in deterministic outputs. There are a few reasons it might not, but I don&amp;#39;t think any of these apply when running a local model like the author did.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that this randomness is illegal under EU anti-discrimination laws because it introduces systematic biases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48718124&quot; title=&quot;And this + the tendency for AI to &amp;#39;prefer&amp;#39; AI produced code + some other AI biased is why *this is most likely highly illegal to use in the EU due to violating anti discrimination laws in multiple ways. To be clear: - randomly filtering &amp;#39;too many&amp;#39; resumes is pretty much allowed (I think) - but must be actual random independent of the resume (and can be in multiple layers, i.e. random filter &amp;gt; pre-select &amp;gt; random filter &amp;gt; select) - this isn&amp;#39;t the case for AI as the random aspect isn&amp;#39;t done as…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that human recruiters are equally inconsistent and influenced by external factors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48715731&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; An alarming number of people don&amp;#39;t understand that LLMs work via purely stochastic processes ... I&amp;#39;ve been studying AI for 20 years. What really needs to be added to this statement is: &amp;#39;An alarming number of people don&amp;#39;t understand that LLMs work via purely stochastic processes - and so does human thinking. People do NOT arrive at the same conclusion if merely the weather&amp;#39;s different. Worse: with human thinking not only do most people not think this is real, a subset of people will actively…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these flaws, some hiring managers defend the 35% &amp;#34;pass rate&amp;#34; as a practical necessity for managing overwhelming applicant volumes that are otherwise impossible for exhausted humans to review &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48714996&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I fail 65% of the time. Same exact resume, different luck. As someone who’s run hiring pipelines for technical roles in the past few years, that’s actually a fantastic number. I objectively hate saying that, but it’s true. 35% chance of elevating a technical individual to the next stage with no effort? I’ve seen as many as 100+ applicants an hour even when including a domain specific screener question. That’s 35 “screened” applicants in an hour. Were valid candidates screened out? Yes. Does…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48715137&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Gates that reduce resume flow-through are only useful if their reduction is correlated with quality. The volume is infeasible to review everyone for quality, even at an hour scale. The conclusion and solution is inevitable, though I wish it were different. 35% is actually really good if you’re not coming in through a referral. The current reality is &amp;lt;1% and the person reviewing you is exhausted.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hccf.onmy.cloud/2026/06/21/reclaiming-our-digital-selves-hccfs-vision-for-a-human-centered-top-level-domain/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;.self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (hccf.onmy.cloud)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48724230&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;676 points · 381 comments · by HumanCCF&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Human-Centered Computing Foundation has launched a campaign to secure &amp;#34;.self,&amp;#34; a new top-level domain dedicated to ethical, human-centered technology and self-hosting. As an ICANN Applicant Support Program participant, the nonprofit aims to create an alternative web architecture that prioritizes user data sovereignty over corporate exploitation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hccf.onmy.cloud/2026/06/21/reclaiming-our-digital-selves-hccfs-vision-for-a-human-centered-top-level-domain/&quot; title=&quot;Title: HCCF’s Vision for a Human-Centered Top-Level Domain – Human-Centered Computing Foundation    URL Source: https://hccf.onmy.cloud/2026/06/21/reclaiming-our-digital-selves-hccfs-vision-for-a-human-centered-top-level-domain/    Markdown Content:  [Skip to content](https://hccf.onmy.cloud/2026/06/21/reclaiming-our-digital-selves-hccfs-vision-for-a-human-centered-top-level-domain/#content)    [![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The proposed `.self` top-level domain aims to offer free subdomains for self-hosting, though critics question the financial viability of a no-fee model and the difficulty of distinguishing between legitimate private use and domain squatting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48725211&quot; title=&quot;https://hccf.onmy.cloud/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/dot-self.... &amp;gt; Everyone entitled to a subdomain at no cost How are you going to pay for the (substantial) cost of running a TLD without registration fee revenue?  Is this a loss leader for other services?  Are you operating on a 100% donation model? &amp;gt; No parking, squatting, or reselling How do you plan to tell the difference between a parked/squatted domain and one in legitimate use but offering no public-facing services?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48724901&quot; title=&quot;This is an idea at this point, the next round of gTLD applications is currently open and we are in the process of applying and we are trying to garner support!&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters expressed skepticism based on the history of free TLDs like `.tk`, noting that they often become magnets for scammers and eventually face widespread blocking by security filters and platforms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48724993&quot; title=&quot;Remember when the .tk TLD became free 20 years ago ? Every hobbyist took one, then scammers followed, then Facebook and antiviruses started blocking it. I remember publishing a website for a class on my .tk domain, the teacher couldn&amp;#39;t open it and I almost got a failing grade because of it.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48725657&quot; title=&quot;What a memory you have unlocked. They were everywhere. I remember the urban legend that .tk domains were X% of their GDP&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. To avoid these pitfalls, participants suggested strict identity verification or non-transferable ownership to prevent a speculative market &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48727332&quot; title=&quot;The &amp;#39;one free domain per person&amp;#39; isn&amp;#39;t the interesting part really - that will be hard to police unless domain name is a function of ID proof (avoids squatting). 0) The actual intersting part of a new TLD can be growing reputation by post-facto taking away a domain without recourse in case of squatting. Instead of adversarial takedowns (which produce false positives as noted), let anyone challenge an inactive domain in the first year or two. 1) If they can figure out a mechanism for moving a…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48724715&quot; title=&quot;Shotgun on your.self! That’s going to yield a ton of great second level sub domains :)&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/pollen-tried-to-remove-my-article-about-callum-negus-fancey-and-google-is-assisting-to-it/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Pollen tried to remove my article and Google is assisting with it&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.pragmaticengineer.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48716902&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;917 points · 127 comments · by taubek&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author of *The Pragmatic Engineer* alleges that Google removed his article about the collapse of tech company Pollen from search results following a fraudulent DMCA copyright claim likely filed by a reputation management firm. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/pollen-tried-to-remove-my-article-about-callum-negus-fancey-and-google-is-assisting-to-it/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Pollen tried to remove my article about CEO Callum Negus-Fancey and CTO Bradley Wright, and Google is assisting with it    URL Source: https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/pollen-tried-to-remove-my-article-about-callum-negus-fancey-and-google-is-assisting-to-it/    Published Time: 2026-06-28T00:40:25.000Z    Markdown Content:  In 2022, I wrote about the damning fall of events tech company Pollen. The [short of it:](https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/pollen/)    &amp;gt; Pollen seemed to have pulled off…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights how bad actors exploit the DMCA process to suppress unfavorable content through fraudulent copyright claims, often using pseudonyms and fictional addresses that Google fails to verify &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48717443&quot; title=&quot;Ah, yes, you know someone&amp;#39;s desperate when you see a bogus DMCA claim like this. Not the first time this happened and definitely won&amp;#39;t be the last. This also demonstrates why it is bad for a law to mandate private entities to do moderation, in this case taking down copyright infringement materials when reported. Google, like basically all big platforms, doesn&amp;#39;t care if a claim is fraudulent because the parties impacted cannot hold it accountable — google  will just tell you they are themselves…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48718226&quot; title=&quot;A good start would be to require that claimants must verify their real identity. The claim in this case was made by an apparent pseudonym and their address is fictional. Both should themselves be reason to reject the claim. The fact that anyone apparently can submit claims to Google under false names seems insane to me.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48717634&quot; title=&quot;DMCA notices are meant to be submitted &amp;#39;under penalty of perjury&amp;#39;, and false notices could in theory result in civil action being taken against those who send them. In practice, neither of these occur even if the sender is a real person, like a record company lawyer lending their name to complaint that are entirely computer generated, or, in this as in so many cases, a completely fabricated identity. Requiring verification through government ID for takedown notices should be a minimum…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest requiring court orders or government ID verification to prevent such abuse, others argue that private platforms are incentivized to prioritize safe harbor protections over accuracy, leaving victims with little recourse &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48717443&quot; title=&quot;Ah, yes, you know someone&amp;#39;s desperate when you see a bogus DMCA claim like this. Not the first time this happened and definitely won&amp;#39;t be the last. This also demonstrates why it is bad for a law to mandate private entities to do moderation, in this case taking down copyright infringement materials when reported. Google, like basically all big platforms, doesn&amp;#39;t care if a claim is fraudulent because the parties impacted cannot hold it accountable — google  will just tell you they are themselves…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48717974&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I think a more sane approach would to require every copyright takedown to require a court order. In a country with an efficient legal system, maybe… Requiring the claimant to put something at stake (make it a nominal deposit you get back in case of either no challenge or the case actually going to court) seems more realistic, but I’m not holding my breath for a reform of the law to that extent.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48718554&quot; title=&quot;This is another problem with letting private entities be the arbitrator. How is Google supposed to know if Ellie Piee is a real person? It can ask for ID verification of course, but these can be faked, and when that happens there is little Google can do to hold the claimant accountable. A court will certainly have an easier time verifying the identity of the claimant and take action when fraud occurs.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also debate regarding whether these removals are formal DMCA actions or Google’s own internal moderation processes, which may lack the legal penalties associated with perjury &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719049&quot; title=&quot;Was this really DMCA?  The article implies it is, but I don&amp;#39;t see any evidence (maybe I missed it).  There is discussion of what the DMCA says, and Google took the article down.  However it is generally understood that DMCA rarely is used to take things down.  Instead Google has a &amp;#39;I can&amp;#39;t believe it isn&amp;#39;t DMCA&amp;#39; process that looks similar, but in reality it isn&amp;#39;t actually DMCA. If this is really DMCA then the author should press charges - DMCA take downs are done under penalty of prejury which…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719367&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; but I don&amp;#39;t see any evidence Isn&amp;#39;t this screenshot on the article evidence https://storage.ghost.io/c/39/f8/39f85cc7-8637-40fc-a57c-f45... ? Or could it still be the &amp;#39;I can&amp;#39;t believe it&amp;#39;s not DMCA&amp;#39; you&amp;#39;ve mentioned?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48717100&quot; title=&quot;Just as there are SEO firms that help companies ascend the rankings, there are &amp;#39;reputation management&amp;#39; firms that erase bad news by publishing new articles &amp;amp; by pushing takedown requests on articles they don&amp;#39;t like.  As with SEO, Google appears to tacitly encourage this. It seems obvious that there should be a review process for takedown requests, with penalties for frivolous requests.  (Up to and perhaps including lawsuits to cover costs and for the sake of deterrence.)  But it&amp;#39;s not at all…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/29/supreme-court-geofence-warrants-case-decision&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;US Supreme Court rules geofence warrants require constitutional protections&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (theguardian.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720924&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;611 points · 295 comments · by cdrnsf&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The US Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that &amp;#34;geofence warrants&amp;#34; sweeping up smartphone location data constitute a Fourth Amendment search, requiring constitutional privacy protections even for data held by third-party tech companies. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/29/supreme-court-geofence-warrants-case-decision&quot; title=&quot;Title: US supreme court rules geofence warrants require constitutional privacy protections    URL Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/29/supreme-court-geofence-warrants-case-decision    Published Time: 2026-06-29T15:23:19.000Z    Markdown Content:  [Skip to main content](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/29/supreme-court-geofence-warrants-case-decision#maincontent)[Skip to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Supreme Court ruled that geofence warrants require Fourth Amendment protections, though the specific defendant’s conviction stood because police acted in &amp;#34;good faith&amp;#34; before this standard was established &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48721772&quot; title=&quot;From https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/06/court-rules-that-law-enfo... Additional details: &amp;gt; The information that Google provided to law enforcement officials came in three tranches. First, Google gave law enforcement officials a list of the 19 accounts (but without the names attached to those accounts) linked to devices that were within 150 meters of the bank during the 30 minutes before and after the robbery. Second, based on that list of 19 accounts, the government asked for additional…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722048&quot; title=&quot;As per the current conservative trend of allowing authoritarianism through technicality, the majority of Alito&amp;#39;s dissent is just that the Court shouldn&amp;#39;t rule on this at all because it won&amp;#39;t help the defendant&amp;#39;s case much specifically.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that privacy should not be expected in public spaces, others contend that indiscriminate digital tracking turns innocent bystanders into suspects, forcing them to defend themselves simply for being near a crime scene &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722279&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I guess don&amp;#39;t bring your phone to a bank robbery. You should also make sure not to bring your phone to anywhere where a nearby crime is happening because that&amp;#39;s all it takes to make you a suspect and force you spend a bunch of money defending yourself. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-tracked-his-bike... Hopefully rulings like this make that scenario a little less likely to happen, but it doesn&amp;#39;t stop it entirely, it just means that the police need to spend 15 minutes to get a…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48723316&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If it is reasonable to have your privacy in a public place I don&amp;#39;t think it&amp;#39;s reasonable to have privacy in a public place.  All other arguments follow from there. What do you think should be &amp;#39;private&amp;#39; when you step outside your home?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Commentators noted a judicial split, with some surprised by Justice Barrett&amp;#39;s position in the minority and others criticizing Justices Alito and Thomas for favoring broad government power &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48721582&quot; title=&quot;Of course Alito and Thomas would have allowed the government unlimited power. I am bit surprised to see Barret in the minority of this one.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48721655&quot; title=&quot;She&amp;#39;s not as big on some of the broader interpretations of the 4th amendment that more civil liberty minded justices would lend credence to.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://investors.rocketlabcorp.com/news-releases/news-release-details/rocket-lab-acquire-iridium-historic-deal-creating-fully&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rocketlab acquires Iridium&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (investors.rocketlabcorp.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719485&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;472 points · 308 comments · by everfrustrated&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rocket Lab has entered a definitive agreement to acquire Iridium Communications for approximately $8 billion in cash and stock, a deal expected to close in mid-2027 that will create a vertically integrated space company combining launch services with global satellite networking. &lt;a href=&quot;https://investors.rocketlabcorp.com/news-releases/news-release-details/rocket-lab-acquire-iridium-historic-deal-creating-fully&quot; title=&quot;Title: Rocket Lab to Acquire Iridium in Historic Deal, Creating A Fully Vertically Integrated Space Powerhouse Primed for Growth | Mon, 06/29/2026 - 07:00    URL Source: https://investors.rocketlabcorp.com/news-releases/news-release-details/rocket-lab-acquire-iridium-historic-deal-creating-fully    Published Time: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 11:24:33 GMT    Markdown Content:  _Unites Rocket Lab&amp;#39;s leading launch and satellite manufacturing capabilities with Iridium&amp;#39;s global network, spectrum, and experience_ _to_…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The acquisition allows Rocket Lab to gain valuable spectrum and a profitable satellite business, though some note Iridium carries significant debt and relies on older hardware models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719486&quot; title=&quot;RocketLab gains spectrum + profitable satellite company&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720404&quot; title=&quot;A profitable satellite company with a lot of debt and satellites that target the previous model of bespoke terminals when the market is moving to satellite service on regular phones.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720249&quot; title=&quot;RocketLab market cap is 57b. Iridium market cap was 5.5b and this transaction values it at 8b.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion largely centers on the &amp;#34;space junk&amp;#34; crisis and the potential for orbital pollution to disrupt the night sky or damage the atmosphere &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720953&quot; title=&quot;We have a bright future full of endless &amp;#39;space-junk&amp;#39;. As the price to orbit drops, people will inevitably send up more and more satellites that have questionable value. In 100 years will the sky at night just be a massive grid of dots moving across the sky? Who will create the first advertisement in space using satellites as pixels to create their company logo? Maybe they can add some color and animations for kicks. Edit: Another note on space junk is the effect on our atmosphere with all the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. To address this, some users advocate for an &amp;#34;orbit value tax&amp;#34; to fund cleanup and prevent first-movers like SpaceX from monopolizing orbital shells, while critics argue such taxes would create a financial barrier to entry and lack a viable global authority for enforcement &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48721053&quot; title=&quot;Hank Green did a video recently advocating for an &amp;#39;orbit value tax&amp;#39; -- like a Georgist Land Value Tax, but for orbits. This tax would, among other things, help fund orbital cleanup and internalize the externality of polluting orbital shells. It&amp;#39;s an idea that deserves more discourse IMO. Here is the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLjW6zuYmos&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722297&quot; title=&quot;Ugh. People already trying to find ways to gate keep space by raising the financial barrier to entry before we&amp;#39;ve even been able to capitalize on cheap space flights. I&amp;#39;m sure SpaceX and others will be against this until suddenly, they&amp;#39;re not, when they realize they&amp;#39;re one of the few that can even afford to pay it. Like when Amazon finally had warehouses in all fifty states and suddenly quit campaigning against online sales tax.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48721425&quot; title=&quot;And who does the tax get paid to? Some mythical Global Government that will totally work this time?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722604&quot; title=&quot;One of the arguments Hank makes in the video is that SpaceX is (via starlink) rapidly occupying large portions of useful LEO shells, which crowds out future competitors or users of that orbit (i.e. you can&amp;#39;t put more satellites into the orbit without risking collisions, especially satellites that aren&amp;#39;t part of the existing constellation), and that the natural consequence of not regulating orbital space in some way would be to lock in the first movers in an orbital shell as the only…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tidal.com/ai-policy&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tidal AI Policy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tidal.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48718840&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;308 points · &lt;strong&gt;346 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by hn8726&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tidal’s AI policy outlines the platform&amp;#39;s commitment to protecting artist rights and compensation while establishing guidelines for the ethical use of artificial intelligence in music creation and distribution. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tidal.com/ai-policy&quot; title=&quot;Title: tidal.com    URL Source: https://tidal.com/ai-policy    Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.  Warning: This page maybe requiring CAPTCHA, please make sure you are authorized to access this page.    Markdown Content:&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tidal’s decision to allow AI-generated music while banning its monetization is seen as a strategic move to stop &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; flooding the platform for profit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719238&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Tidal will accept AI-generated music. &amp;gt; Tidal will hold AI-generated music to a higher standard of content integrity. We will not tolerate AI-generated music that exploits an individual’s or group’s music, name or likeness, deceives listeners, or diminishes the quality of our service. I think this is a very reasonable approach, and probably also the best way to treat AI-powered copyright infringement as a whole. Just like we don&amp;#39;t penalize artists for consuming content unless they produce…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719295&quot; title=&quot;The flood of AI music on their platform is becuase people can make money off it. If you turn off that faucet you stop the flooding.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that music is fundamentally about human connection and advocate for &amp;#34;human-verified&amp;#34; platforms to combat the decline in content quality seen on services like Kindle and X, others believe AI will eventually surpass human output and that the emotional impact of music is subjective &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719360&quot; title=&quot;I really hope someone makes a music platform in the future that is verified as human-made. Music is about connecting to human emotions, not poor facsimiles of it. Tie it to in-person concerts and it might actually work as a business, as well as logistically – maybe the company can be a record producer in disguise and physically meet every musician they host.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719327&quot; title=&quot;I think this is also a reason why X has gotten worse. They pay people for engagement.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719427&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Music is about connecting to human emotions, not poor facsimiles of it &amp;#39;art is in the eye of the beholder.&amp;#39; I listen to a lot of EDM, which can be very mechanical, but I personally have strong emotional connection to. I personally would welcome AI-generated music as an alternative to human-made. To be clear: I do agree a &amp;#39;human-verified&amp;#39; system would be great, but I don&amp;#39;t think it would be black and white. And I would guess that eventually AI music will be better than a lot of human made…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719826&quot; title=&quot;And the flood really is overwhelming. This weekend my mom was complaining about having trouble finding anything actually good to read on Kindle Unlimited. I mentioned that the relative lack of slop is one of the major reasons I chose Kobo over Kindle. Even before this latest AI boom I was already starting to view less content as a feature, not a bug, because it seems that on subscription services “more” is increasingly just a polite way of saying “more crap.” Similar feelings about Nebula vs…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant portion of the debate centers on the legal status of these works, noting that the US Copyright Office currently views raw AI output as public domain due to a lack of human authorship &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719569&quot; title=&quot;Isn’t it true that AI generated music holds no legal copyright?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719700&quot; title=&quot;I was under the impression that the US copyright office/various judges already determined that anything created 100% by AI is not copyrightable. A synthesizer is not AI.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720989&quot; title=&quot;Minor correction, but in the US it&amp;#39;s not anything that&amp;#39;s 100% by AI, it&amp;#39;s LLM output itself is not copyrightable. Human elements injected into LLM output are. Raw LLM output lacks human authorship, and it was ruled cannot be registered for copyright protection. Raw LLM output is automatically public domain (which is also why its silly for Anthropic to be in such a tizzy about China using Claude&amp;#39;s output, Claude&amp;#39;s output is public domain). Only the parts of a work that are human authored can be…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.sedaily.com/international/2026/06/29/samsung-sk-hynix-micron-sued-in-us-over-memory-price-fixing&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron Sued in US over Memory Price Fixing&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (en.sedaily.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48718102&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;427 points · 195 comments · by donohoe&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron are facing a lawsuit in the United States over allegations of memory chip price fixing. &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.sedaily.com/international/2026/06/29/samsung-sk-hynix-micron-sued-in-us-over-memory-price-fixing&quot; title=&quot;Title: The request could not be satisfied    URL Source: https://en.sedaily.com/international/2026/06/29/samsung-sk-hynix-micron-sued-in-us-over-memory-price-fixing    Warning: Target URL returned error 403: Forbidden  Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.    Markdown Content:  ## 403 ERROR    * * *     Request blocked. We can&amp;#39;t connect to the server for this app or website at this time. There might be too much traffic or a configuration error. Try again…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The lawsuit alleges memory manufacturers colluded to fix prices by shifting production from DDR4 to HBM, though some users argue this is merely a rational business response to market demand rather than illegal coordination &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719109&quot; title=&quot;HBM is also DRAM. I also think it&amp;#39;s kind of a weak argument to say that them discontinuing ddr3 (which while in use still today in industrial/embedded was on the way out for consumers 10 years ago) and ddr4 which last had consumer CPUs for it 3 years ago is meaningful. What we need now is ddr5. Turning off the old fabs and moving those resources including people to ddr5 is a good thing. That&amp;#39;s not price fixing. It&amp;#39;s possible price fixing is in play, but discontinuing products people objectively…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48721348&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;re running a business not a charity. Their job is to manufacture what the market as a whole demands. If they can make more money making HBM than DDR4 then they have to make HBM. Why would a business go out of its way to make less money?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics contend that while discontinuing older standards like DDR3 is logical, DDR4 remains highly relevant for modern hardware, and the lack of smaller competitors to fill this gap suggests a broken market &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719287&quot; title=&quot;Switching off DDR3 manufacturing I can understand, but DDR4 machines are still quite relevant and usable… Ryzen 5000 series boxes for example don’t feel meaningfully weaker than they did when new. My 5950X tower certainly doesn’t, and it’d really be nice to be able to upgrade its RAM should I need to because it will continue to be useful for quite some time. AMD just re-released their 5800X3D for AM4 board users who wish to upgrade which is further evidence that shutting off DDR4 production is…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48721432&quot; title=&quot;1. The AI bubble is an insane distortion and the gravy train isn’t going to last forever. Betting the farm on everlasting datacenter demand is myopic. 2. In a healthy, competitive market there would be smaller manufacturers that’d be happy to take up the big guys’ discarded business.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Legal skepticism remains high because a similar 2022 case failed due to a lack of evidence of an explicit agreement, leading to discussions on whether the companies are engaging in &amp;#34;tacit collusion&amp;#34; or simple price matching &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719053&quot; title=&quot;This was attempted before in 2022 but fell apart because plaintiff couldn&amp;#39;t show an agreement took place https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2022/03/07/2...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722465&quot; title=&quot;If there is no agreement, then the magic term is &amp;#39;tacit collusion.&amp;#39; Why not ask the same ridiculous amount of money your competitors do? People seem to be paying for it. Their fault. If suppliers have sufficiently different products, they can make some more expensive, others cheaper; on average, everybody pays more. A high barrier to entry might help such practices. That doesn&amp;#39;t mean I&amp;#39;m saying this is what is happening. Sometimes things just suck, and somebody bought the world&amp;#39;s supply of RAM…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719603&quot; title=&quot;Price fixing is legal as long as your are doing it in the open. In the UK it is called &amp;#39;price match&amp;#39; and eg. if supermarket says they keep prices matched to their competitor. No regulator raises an eyebrow. So here Samsung and SK Hynix could say they price match to Micron and they are in the clear.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. If the US pursues aggressive action, some wonder if manufacturers could bypass US jurisdiction, though others note the industry&amp;#39;s heavy reliance on American-linked technology and tooling &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720362&quot; title=&quot;What happens if Samsung and SK Hynix simply stop selling to US at all? Micron is in US but are the rest still in the US jurisdiction? They are selling the hottest commodity of the day. It’s made outside of the US using non-American tooling.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720472&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;It’s made outside of the US using non-American tooling. Depends if US can demand ASML which uses plenty of US tech inside. In reality even the DRAM and NAND supply chain has plenty of US technologies. And you say Micron are US but they have lots of Fabs in Japan as well since they acquired Elpida.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://probablymarcus.com/blocks/2026/06/28/native-graphical-shell-for-SSH.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A native graphical shell for SSH&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (probablymarcus.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720758&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;370 points · 226 comments · by mrcslws&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The developer has released Outer Shell, an open-source graphical environment that allows servers to host native or web-based apps accessible over SSH via Unix domain sockets. &lt;a href=&quot;https://probablymarcus.com/blocks/2026/06/28/native-graphical-shell-for-SSH.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: A native graphical shell for SSH    URL Source: https://probablymarcus.com/blocks/2026/06/28/native-graphical-shell-for-SSH.html    Published Time: 2026-06-28T00:00:00-07:00    Markdown Content:  With the web browser, we have really figured out a good flow for how one device (the “server”) can provide an experience on another device (the “client”).    This raises a fun idea: imagine if servers and edge devices could serve up a browser-based graphical “shell” so they can be used from other…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Critics argue that a native graphical shell for SSH is a &amp;#34;solution in search of a problem,&amp;#34; noting that the core functionality has existed for years in tools like Cockpit or via standard SSH port forwarding &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48723224&quot; title=&quot;This appears to me like a solution in search of a problem, like many others before it...the quote below seems relevant to this effort. &amp;#39;Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.&amp;#39; ~Henry Spencer&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48723881&quot; title=&quot;Author apparently has never heard about Cockpit. Everything they mention as &amp;#39;missing&amp;#39;, or &amp;#39;novel&amp;#39; has been part of Cockpit for over a decade, from socket-based web server connection, backend-frontend separation for server apps and the whole idea of a server console with shell access itself. To answer them: &amp;#39;Isn’t it weird that this doesn’t already exist?&amp;#39; - No, it&amp;#39;s not, because it has existed for ages.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48721834&quot; title=&quot;i&amp;#39;m trying to understand how outer shell works here. on the website you give the following as your motivation: &amp;gt; Apps like Jupyter and Tensorboard are not typically visible to standard web browsers if they’re running on remote servers, because it would be terribly unsafe to let the whole internet touch this app. Instead, they run on a local port on the server, which your computer can’t access directly. &amp;gt; Classically, to get access to these, you had to open a new terminal and run: &amp;gt; ssh -L…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some maintain that a shell is strictly for CLI interaction, others contend that modern users should not be limited by 40-year-old UX constraints and should be able to handle rich media or GUI applications over the protocol &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48721461&quot; title=&quot;Defeats the purpose of the shell. The shell is for CLI interaction.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48721664&quot; title=&quot;No. A shell is any user interface. Windows shell is explorer.exe and it used to be possible to change that via a config line in a system INI file. SSH protocol also isn’t just for CLI work. It supports file transport (eg SFTP), TCP/IP forwarding and even SOCKS HTTP proxying. You also used to be able to run GUI applications over SSH via X11.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48721681&quot; title=&quot;You have a very loose definition of a shell that conflicts with about 40 years of history.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48724798&quot; title=&quot;No. It’s just that now more people are using Linux the more the ux decisions that were made 40 years ago will be questioned. Almost all dev facing machines have ssh server installed and accessible. Why ssh terminal has to look like character-only trash from 1960s? Why a TUI is the best thing we pipe through ssh? Why I cannot watch a 4k movie in the terminal or browse the web using pinch to zoom ?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents suggest the tool simplifies workflows by removing the need for manual reverse proxies and TLS certificates for single-user remote access &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722142&quot; title=&quot;I guess it saves you the hassle of dealing with reverse proxies and TLS certs if your use case is &amp;#39;userbase is 1 person and it is me, and i only access services from a desktop os&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://torrentfreak.com/european-isps-want-rightsholders-held-accountable-for-overblocking-damage/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;European ISPs Want Rightsholders Held Accountable for Overblocking Damage&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (torrentfreak.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48721072&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;418 points · 124 comments · by Brajeshwar&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;EuroISPA, representing over 3,300 European internet service providers, is urging the EU Commission to hold rightsholders legally and financially accountable for collateral damage caused by overbroad piracy blocking orders that affect legitimate websites and services. &lt;a href=&quot;https://torrentfreak.com/european-isps-want-rightsholders-held-accountable-for-overblocking-damage/&quot; title=&quot;European ISPs Want Rightsholders Held Accountable for Overblocking Damage * TorrentFreak    For years, rightsholders have pushed for broader site blocking orders, with no direct liability for overblocking. EuroISPA want to change that.    [![](https://torrentfreak.com/wp-content/themes/tf-theme-v2/build/assets/img/logo.svg)](/)    ![](https://torrentfreak.com/wp-content/themes/tf-theme-v2/build/assets/img/search.svg)    * News ▼    + [Piracy](https://torrentfreak.com/category/piracy/)    + [Piracy…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that rightsholders should face liability for overblocking, noting that current systems like the DMCA allow for the removal of innocent content without consequence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722040&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not just Europe. DMCA takedowns in the US: no liability for taking down innocent content. Really, it comes down to this: censorship is bad. Always. If someone violates the law, get a court judgement. With the judgement in hand, take down that specific material. Too much work? Tough...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48721205&quot; title=&quot;Such an obvious thing, should have been there from day 1. The situation in Spain is particularly crazy. How can la liga have this much power over the Internet?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some advocate for a strict &amp;#34;no censorship&amp;#34; rule requiring court judgments for all removals, others contend that immediate moderation is essential for illegal content such as child exploitation, doxxing, and revenge porn &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722040&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not just Europe. DMCA takedowns in the US: no liability for taking down innocent content. Really, it comes down to this: censorship is bad. Always. If someone violates the law, get a court judgement. With the judgement in hand, take down that specific material. Too much work? Tough...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722437&quot; title=&quot;Isnt taking down illegal content censorship? If not you can get around the absolute statement “censorship is always bad” by just making more things illegal. I think censorship is so clearly good in some scenarios that we would never think to even debate it. Like child porn.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722919&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; censorship is bad. Always. Sure! Great slogan! Who can disagree! Now, let&amp;#39;s define the terms? What&amp;#39;s censorship? Don&amp;#39;t we all want some sort of censoring of content? If someone doxxxes me, posts revenge porn of me, threatens me and my family with credible threats of harm, shares my credit card numbers and bank/Bitcoin/Ethereum accounts, uploads all 400 of my password credentials and my mobile phone#, posts videos of them strangling my dog, wages a campaign to redefine my personal name into a…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights the disproportionate power of sports organizations in Europe, where &amp;#34;soccer lobbying&amp;#34; has led to aggressive internet controls and disruptive real-world infrastructure priorities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48721205&quot; title=&quot;Such an obvious thing, should have been there from day 1. The situation in Spain is particularly crazy. How can la liga have this much power over the Internet?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48721297&quot; title=&quot;In the US there is lobbying. In Spain there is soccer. I have seen crazy things done just for soccer. The town I used to live in closed my street for a few weeks during one world cup. I wasn&amp;#39;t able to use my garage during all that time. Also, somehow small towns always find money available for soccer related stuff (like building stadiums, events, etc.) but there is no money for improving healthcare or building parks. I hated that&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/i/status/2071277885646868536&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Instagram is incorporating users&amp;#39; photos in ads for Meta Glasses&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719027&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;357 points · 146 comments · by notRobot&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instagram is reportedly incorporating users&amp;#39; personal photos into ultra-personalized advertisements for Meta&amp;#39;s smart glasses. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/i/status/2071277885646868536&quot; title=&quot;Title: The era of ultra-personalized ads has begun… https://t.co/0BVkbWJq5Y    URL Source: https://twitter.com/i/status/2071277885646868536    Published Time: 2026-06-28T17:01:45.000Z    Markdown Content:  ## Post    [Log in](https://x.com/i/jf/onboarding/web?mode=login)[Sign up](https://x.com/i/jf/onboarding/web?mode=signup)    ## Post    [![Image 1: user avatar](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/2037566395379290112/uRvCouVZ_normal.jpg)](https://x.com/venturetwins)    [Justine…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters note that Meta’s use of user content in advertisements is not a new development, citing similar terms of service and practices dating back to at least 2013 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719401&quot; title=&quot;Didn&amp;#39;t Facebook do this years and years ago? Yes, 2013: https://mashable.com/archive/facebook-ads-photo#ggcKnNfAUaqy &amp;gt; According to Facebook&amp;#39;s Statement of Rights and Responsibilities: &amp;gt; You give us permission to use your name, profile picture, content, and information in connection with commercial, sponsored, or related content (such as a brand you like) served or enhanced by us. This means, for example, that you permit a business or other entity to pay us to display your name and/or profile…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722159&quot; title=&quot;Almost literally every single social media site in the past ~15+ years has had those exact terms in it. Everything you upload, almost everywhere, can be used by the site owners to do whatever they like for their own purposes (reselling is somewhat often excluded / non-transferrable).  There are a handful of exceptions, but they&amp;#39;re very much exceptions, not the normal rule.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find the resulting ads—such as a brother appearing in a dating ad—to be memorable or &amp;#34;hilarious&amp;#34; anecdotes, others argue these terms are &amp;#34;incredible&amp;#34; clauses that most users never actually read &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720244&quot; title=&quot;Those are incredible terms that no one read.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719919&quot; title=&quot;Many years ago (back when Facebook still had sidebar ads), my sister was presented with a dating ad for &amp;#39;Hot Christian Singles&amp;#39; accompanied by a photo of our brother. It was hilarious, but also mind-boggling. In what scenario would pulling in a friend&amp;#39;s profile photo create a useful ad?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720225&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; In what scenario would pulling in a friend&amp;#39;s profile photo create a useful ad? Exactly in the scenario you just described. You still remember it and you are actively talking about it years after the fact.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion highlights a difficult trade-off: while users may want to avoid such &amp;#34;abuse,&amp;#34; many feel forced to remain on these platforms because small businesses increasingly use Instagram as a primary replacement for traditional websites and newsletters &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720293&quot; title=&quot;Is Meta abusing its users a problem? Yes. Does the TOS allow for it? Yes. Can people decide to just create a shell account and not actually participate? Sure. One of the real insidious problems with Instagram and to some extent Facebook is that they provide a free, low friction way for business to communicate with current or potential customers. As a result many small businesses use Instagram as replacement for a public facing website and perhaps a blog or email newsletter. Many small business…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/south-korea-to-spend-1t-on-more-memory-chip-production-and-humanoid-robots/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;South Korea to spend $1T on more memory chip production and humanoid robots&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (arstechnica.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48726102&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;259 points · 209 comments · by jnord&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;South Korea and its leading tech firms are investing $1 trillion in megaprojects to double memory chip production, build AI data centers, and commercialize humanoid robots by 2028 to secure a global lead in &amp;#34;physical AI.&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/south-korea-to-spend-1t-on-more-memory-chip-production-and-humanoid-robots/&quot; title=&quot;Title: South Korea to spend $1T on more memory chip production and humanoid robots    URL Source: https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/south-korea-to-spend-1t-on-more-memory-chip-production-and-humanoid-robots/    Published Time: 2026-06-29T21:09:43+00:00    Markdown Content:  [Skip to content](https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/south-korea-to-spend-1t-on-more-memory-chip-production-and-humanoid-robots/#main)    Must construct additional pylons    South Korea targets physical AI lead and commercial humanoid…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;South Korea’s massive investment is heavily weighted toward semiconductor fabrication and AI data centers, with humanoid robots receiving a comparatively small fraction of the total budget &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48727366&quot; title=&quot;$585B on new fabs, $357B on AI data centers, and $5.8B on humanoid robots. One of those numbers is not like the others&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users question the practicality and cost of the humanoid form factor &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48726810&quot; title=&quot;Why humanoid? Surely there must be a superior physical form factor than one mimicking human anatomy. Is it just supposed to be more psychologically acceptable?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48727061&quot; title=&quot;I understand the argument but its honestly ridiculous in my eyes.  How about a set of arms that can reach into dishwasher and stack dishes and a washer/dryer to fold laundry...  Except even without solving the bipedal movement, that doesn&amp;#39;t exist at a consumer price point. Why are we pretending the hardest version of this is close to existing?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48727264&quot; title=&quot;Why not buy a second set of arms instead of legs or just a set a wheels?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue it is the most versatile design for navigating human environments like stairs and performing multi-purpose tasks across various industries &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48726865&quot; title=&quot;There are just a few reasons - humanoid make sense, mostly for multi purpose tasks - where if you want a robot to be multi-job, do almost everything a human can do at work -- If you want a weld you need a 1 arm robot, if a robot to weld, then stack, then push parts on a cart across the factory - then sweep up, then etc.. etc.. perhaps a humanoid is alright. There will definitely be too many people comfortable with ownership / master relationship with a humanoid robot that will do their bidding.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48727126&quot; title=&quot;It doesn&amp;#39;t need to be at a consumer price point first, it needs to replace a human at an existing warehouse or manufacturing role first, and that&amp;#39;s achievable in the next two years at this point. When you have arms that can reach into the dishwasher, you&amp;#39;re also going to want them to put away your dishes. And so suddenly they need to get up high. And you&amp;#39;re not going to have a SECOND set of arms at your washer/dryer to fold laundry, you&amp;#39;re just going to buy a second DLC for your existing robot.…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. This push into robotics is also viewed as a strategic &amp;#34;top of the pyramid&amp;#34; application that will drive further demand for the country&amp;#39;s memory chips and AI infrastructure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48727674&quot; title=&quot;Androids (humanoid robots) will require loads of ram, and loads of model training under the current paradigm.  So it sort of makes sense.  At least, I see robots as the top of the pyramid.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.playstation.com/en-gb/legal/psvideocontent/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Studio Canal Movies purchased on PlayStation Store removed without refund&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (playstation.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48718967&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;241 points · 130 comments · by kugelblitz&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Due to licensing agreement changes, PlayStation Store users will lose access to all previously purchased Studio Canal content on September 1, 2026, with the titles being permanently removed from their video libraries. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.playstation.com/en-gb/legal/psvideocontent/&quot; title=&quot;Studio Canal Removal    Legal notice    # Studio Canal affected titles    From September 1, 2026, due to our content licensing agreements, you will no longer be able to access your previously purchased content from Studio Canal, and it will be removed from your video library.    Thank you,   PlayStation Store    |  |  | --- |  | 1 - Life on the Limit |  | 10 jours sans maman |  | 10 Minutes Gone |  | 13 Minutes |  | 30 jours max |  | 388 Arletta Ave |  | 68 Kill |  | &amp;#39;71 |  | 99 Homes |  | A Bigger Splash |  | A…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The removal of purchased content highlights a fundamental flaw in digital licensing, with users arguing that Sony should have negotiated perpetual access for existing libraries rather than allowing licenses to be revoked &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719991&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; due to our content licensing agreements Aka, due to their mistake . When Sony originally signed an agreement, they should have insisted on a perpetual license for anything already in the customer&amp;#39;s library. I was initially inclined toward some minimal sympathy for Sony here, but I see no good faith reason why they&amp;#39;d sign a licensing agreement which allows the other party to do this.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720434&quot; title=&quot;If I buy a DVD, it costs a fixed price. Why should it be variable, if we talk about digital media? Storage and content streaming is cheaper than embracing a whole logistic (producing DVDs/BlueRays, packaging, shipping). But here we are again: if you buy something digital, you just pay for a &amp;#39;usage license&amp;#39;, you don&amp;#39;t own anything at all. After all these years or decades, I am still surprised that people expect to own digital content, forever&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest that physical media remains the only &amp;#34;forever&amp;#34; version, others point out that Blu-ray DRM and disc degradation present their own risks, often making piracy or ripping content seem like more reliable alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720439&quot; title=&quot;Terminator 2 is currently $8 for a bluray on amazon. $10 for a DVD. This is reasonably a forever version.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720904&quot; title=&quot;DVD perhaps yes, until the disc degrades. BluRay no, because your player&amp;#39;s keys can be revoked when you pop in a new disc.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720944&quot; title=&quot;Ok, how long do you have to rip &amp;amp; copy the content as you desire? It is still reasonably a forever version. Before you bring up laws around keys, first consider that jaywalking in front of your house is illegal too. Again, it is reasonably a forever version.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48721004&quot; title=&quot;Why even bother with all those hoops. Just download.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also explores the potential for small claims court action and the disparity between the convenience of digital &amp;#34;purchases&amp;#34; and the reality that consumers are merely paying for a temporary usage license &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720068&quot; title=&quot;A friend and I were talking about this.   What would you pay for it? When iTunes + came out,  you had 2 options,  you could buy a song for $0.99 or you could be the plus version for more,  I don&amp;#39;t remember but it was like $1.35 or something.   Plus had a higher bit rate and it wasn&amp;#39;t encrypted. Suppose you could buy a movie for $12.00, how much would you pay for the forever version?  $30?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720037&quot; title=&quot;I have to wonder what small claims court judges would think of it. Get a few hundred cases filed across the US and the travel expense for Sony could be significant.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720434&quot; title=&quot;If I buy a DVD, it costs a fixed price. Why should it be variable, if we talk about digital media? Storage and content streaming is cheaper than embracing a whole logistic (producing DVDs/BlueRays, packaging, shipping). But here we are again: if you buy something digital, you just pay for a &amp;#39;usage license&amp;#39;, you don&amp;#39;t own anything at all. After all these years or decades, I am still surprised that people expect to own digital content, forever&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.apollo.com/content/dam/apolloaem/pdf/daily-spark/2026/jun/28/062826-Mag7.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mag 7 starting to underperform [pdf]&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (apollo.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719532&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;185 points · 148 comments · by mooreds&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As of June 2026, the &amp;#34;Magnificent 7&amp;#34; tech stocks are underperforming as market leadership rotates toward quality and free cash flow, driven by converging earnings growth with the rest of the S&amp;amp;P 500 and the lowest P/E premium for the group in over a decade. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.apollo.com/content/dam/apolloaem/pdf/daily-spark/2026/jun/28/062826-Mag7.pdf&quot; title=&quot;Title: 062826-Mag7.pdf    URL Source: https://www.apollo.com/content/dam/apolloaem/pdf/daily-spark/2026/jun/28/062826-Mag7.pdf    Published Time: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 17:52:32 GMT    Number of Pages: 32    Markdown Content:  Unless otherwise noted, information as of June 2026.     Proprietary - Not for distribution, in whole or in part, without the express written consent of Apollo Global Management, Inc.     ## Mag 7 starting to underperform:     ## Markets rotating toward quality and free cash flow     June 2026…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether the &amp;#34;Magnificent 7&amp;#34; are facing a historical correction, with some citing data that top market performers typically underperform by nearly 2% annually over the following decade &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719958&quot; title=&quot;Historically stocks that had a good run then tended to underperform: &amp;gt; […] Since 1926, the median ten-year return on individual U.S. stocks relative to the broad equity market is –7.9%, underperforming by 0.82% per year. For stocks that have been among the top 20% performers over the previous five years, the median ten-year market-adjusted return falls to –17.8%, underperforming by 1.94% per year. Since the end of World War II, the median ten-year market-adjusted return of recent winners has…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720436&quot; title=&quot;Yes, but when their run ends they tend to underperform. Every time.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that these companies are currently eroding their free cash flow through massive AI capital expenditures without clear returns, potentially forcing a shift from infrastructure spending back to stock repurchases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719918&quot; title=&quot;Apollo Group has $1T assets under management, I believe them over most folks on HN. Their argument that the Mag 7 is burning up all of their free cash flow is factually accurate, as the returns are not materializing for the investments being made (ie underperformance).&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720023&quot; title=&quot;I like that the invisible hand of market is slapping the Mag-7 for capex which is the only way to discipline them. Investors are waking up to say: hey, you are spending all your profits on data-centers, where is the return for me ? But, it surprises me that there are vast pools of capital which we collectively call the &amp;#39;market&amp;#39; that makes these calculations, or maybe a simpler causal explanation is the missing stock repurchase bid. At some point, one of the hyperscalers (msft ?) will break from…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others remain skeptical of this bearish outlook, pointing to strong fundamental earnings and noting that similar predictions of underperformance have been proven wrong for decades &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720329&quot; title=&quot;I mean these stocks have been performers for decades. If you posted this 10 years ago you&amp;#39;d look really wrong.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720491&quot; title=&quot;I guess Google’s Q1 earnings of  $62 billion were just hype.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fergusfinn.com/blog/what-happens-when-you-run-a-gpu-kernel/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What happens when you run a CUDA kernel?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (fergusfinn.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48718863&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;294 points · 32 comments · by mezark&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This technical deep dive tracks a CUDA vector addition kernel from compilation to execution, explaining how the driver translates code into SASS, manages host-to-GPU communication via pushbuffers and doorbells, and how the hardware schedules warps using scoreboard barriers to hide memory latency across the PCIe bus. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fergusfinn.com/blog/what-happens-when-you-run-a-gpu-kernel/&quot; title=&quot;Title: What happens when you run a CUDA kernel    URL Source: https://fergusfinn.com/blog/what-happens-when-you-run-a-gpu-kernel/    Markdown Content:  Here’s a simple CUDA program. It adds two vectors.    ```  __global__ void vadd(const float* a, const float* b, float* c, int n) {      int i = blockIdx.x * blockDim.x + threadIdx.x;      if (i &amp;lt; n) c[i] = a[i] + b[i];  }    int main() {      int n = 1 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; 20;                 // a million floats (1,048,576)      size_t bytes = n * sizeof(float);        float *a =…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the specialized industry of CUDA kernel optimization, with some debating whether these firms will be acquired as &amp;#34;moats&amp;#34; or eventually replaced by open-source libraries and automated ML research &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720748&quot; title=&quot;There are companies whose whole job right now is to optimize kernels so that things run faster. I wonder if those companies are going to be dethroned by some sort of like open source library that can do that really well (I bet Nvidia could release it any day.).. or if they&amp;#39;re going to thrive and be acquired by the big providers as a `moat` to speed up their infrerence.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48721162&quot; title=&quot;Near-term acquihires are certainly a likely bet I think. But given model progress on related benchmarks like kernelbench [1], I do think a set of more commoditized solutions is also inevitable. The caveat though is that each new gen of hardware often comes with brand new constraints/features that a given generation of models haven&amp;#39;t seen before (e.g. tcgen05 in blackwell was OOD at one point). As the models start to generalize better, this might not be a showstopper, but still an issue at least…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48723279&quot; title=&quot;shouldn&amp;#39;t it be possible to be run as a mlautoresearch project?  i.e. orchestrate 10 strategies to speed it up, run in paralellel, pick the winning and go from there?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users report that debugging NVIDIA’s drivers and libraries consumes significant engineering time at scale &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722486&quot; title=&quot;When you run CUDA at scale dealing with nvidia driver and library bugs takes up a disgustingly large percentage of engineer time, I don&amp;#39;t know a lot of people who would be looking forward to rely on more nvidia libraries.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that many reported issues are actually application-level bugs rather than driver flaws &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48725347&quot; title=&quot;How do you determine that the bugs you run into are located in the Nvidia drivers and libraries? Way back when I wrote the OpenCL driver at Qualcomm, we would frequently get bug reports from customers complaining about our code. During my tenure, every single one of them was root-caused as an application bug. Unsurprisingly, considering that our code was backed by an extensive test suite and their code wasn&amp;#39;t. Not to say that our code was perfect, of course. But people have a tendency to blame…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical experts suggest that while high-level APIs can be opaque, using the CUDA driver API or modern wrappers provides better visibility into the execution process &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719527&quot; title=&quot;First - nice writeup which goes into a lot of nooks and crannies. That said, a lot of the user-space &amp;#39;voodoo&amp;#39; is gone if you don&amp;#39;t go through CUDA&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;runtime API&amp;#39;. If you use the driver API, take your kernel source as a string and compile it with NVIDIA&amp;#39;s run-time compiler, you&amp;#39;ll have better visibility into a lot (not all) of what&amp;#39;s going on. For the &amp;#39;raw&amp;#39; version of this, look at: https://github.com/NVIDIA/cuda-samples/tree/master/cpp/0_Int... but for a much more readable, and still fully…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/deepreinforce-ai/Ornith-1&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ornith-1.0: self-improving open-source models for agentic coding&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722052&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;261 points · 52 comments · by danboarder&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DeepReinforce has released Ornith-1.0, a series of open-source, self-improving models designed for agentic coding. Ranging from 9B to 397B parameters, the models utilize reinforcement learning to optimize reasoning trajectories and achieve state-of-the-art performance on benchmarks like SWE-bench and Terminal-Bench. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/deepreinforce-ai/Ornith-1&quot; title=&quot;GitHub - deepreinforce-ai/Ornith-1    Contribute to deepreinforce-ai/Ornith-1 development by creating an account on GitHub.    [Skip to content](#start-of-content)    ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [Sign in](/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fdeepreinforce-ai%2FOrnith-1)    Appearance settings    * Platform      + AI CODE CREATION      - [GitHub CopilotWrite better code with AI](https://github.com/features/copilot)      - [GitHub Copilot appDirect agents from issue to…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Ornith-1.0 release has sparked debate within the local LLM community, with some users praising its creative coding solutions while others dismiss it as a &amp;#34;benchmaxxed&amp;#34; fine-tune that fails to live up to its hype &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48724416&quot; title=&quot;This is the first Qwen fine-tune that is not immediately rejected by the local LLM community, and in some cases even being recommended. Based on my limited usage, it is good, gives creative solutions to coding problems. I don&amp;#39;t expect 9-35B models to one-click create full apps. Most people who were complaining did so .&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48725325&quot; title=&quot;Its not any better. Most of us at LocalLLama community dont like it except a few new people poping out and making posts.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48724280&quot; title=&quot;These are simply benchmaxxed versions of either Qwen or Gemma 4.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue the &amp;#34;self-improving&amp;#34; label is a misleading description of the training process rather than a dynamic feature of the model itself, leading to skepticism about the project&amp;#39;s origins and technical substance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48723119&quot; title=&quot;Can anyone explain what’s the story here? Is this just a re-skinned qwen? Who is deepreinforce-ai and why isn’t this model listed on their website? How does it self-improve, does the model change on disk - or just during a single context run it gets better?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48723198&quot; title=&quot;It doesn&amp;#39;t self-improve, that&amp;#39;s a misleading headline. As far as I can tell they trained it by running their own reinforcement learning on top of Qwen and Gemma 4 (not sure how they combined weights from both, or if they used Qwen as the basis and Gemma 4 to help train?) - so the &amp;#39;self-improving&amp;#39; is about their training process, not how you use the weights.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, the discussion highlights a growing cultural divide in the community, with long-time members lamenting an influx of &amp;#34;hype&amp;#34; driven by former crypto enthusiasts and a shift toward &amp;#34;slop and vibes&amp;#34; over technical rigor &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48726603&quot; title=&quot;The local LLM community is now teeming with erstwhile crypto and NFT hucksters who&amp;#39;ve brought the culture of hype from their former communities with them. There still are a few deeply technical people left, but their voices are being crowded out by the vapid marketers&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48725715&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; LocalLLama community Ah, the place that shit on gpt-oss because it wasn&amp;#39;t good at porn. That place is not what it used to be, hasn&amp;#39;t been since that karpathy tweet, tbh. It&amp;#39;s mostly slop and vibes nowadays.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48727137&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve also noticed this. I wonder what causes the overlap. It can&amp;#39;t be as simple as crypto and LLMs requiring the same hardware.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://humphri.es/blog/WATaBoy/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;WATaBoy: JIT-Ing Game Boy Instructions to WASM Beats a Native Interpreter&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (humphri.es)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720190&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;227 points · 37 comments · by energeticbark&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WATaBoy is a Game Boy emulator that uses a &amp;#34;JIT-to-Wasm&amp;#34; technique to bypass iOS execution restrictions, achieving speeds 1.2x faster than a native interpreter. By generating WebAssembly bytecode at runtime, the project demonstrates a viable path for high-performance, cross-platform emulation within web browsers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://humphri.es/blog/WATaBoy/&quot; title=&quot;Title: WATaBoy: JIT-ing Game Boy Instructions to Wasm Beats a Native Interpreter    URL Source: https://humphri.es/blog/WATaBoy/    Published Time: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 14:44:18 GMT    Markdown Content:  Published on June 28th, 2026  ## Background    This text assumes the reader is familiar with the concept of [just-in-time compilation](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just-in-time_compilation).  Dolphin isn’t on iOS, because you can’t do JIT compilation on iOS. That’s a quick summary of OatmealDome’s blog post…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While commenters praised the project&amp;#39;s technical depth for an undergraduate, some noted that JIT compilation naturally outperforms interpreters due to lower overhead &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48721179&quot; title=&quot;This is an incredible project for an undergraduate. Very impressive.  Interesting to note that Firefox is 25% slower than Chrome/Safari, I wonder why.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722015&quot; title=&quot;Of course it beats a native interpreter. WASM overhead is about 20%, interpreter overhead is about 1000%. What&amp;#39;s cool here is to have a GameBoy JIT runtime at all.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant point of discussion centered on the strategic use of WebAssembly to bypass iOS JIT restrictions, which typically block emulators like Dolphin but allow high-performance execution within browser engines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48724505&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Dolphin isn’t on iOS, because you can’t do JIT compilation on iOS....Well, Apple has one exception to its JIT restrictions: web browsers. JavaScriptCore, WebKit’s JS engine, uses JIT compilation for its higher-performance tiers. So, if a JS function is called enough times, eventually it’ll be optimised and compiled into native machine code. The same is true for WebAssembly. I was wondering about the why of the headline, and this is a really interesting answer. Such a beautiful way to get…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argued the project&amp;#39;s premise ignored existing solutions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48725140&quot; title=&quot;The author&amp;#39;s base assumption, and stated motivation for doing this project, is wrong. https://github.com/StephenDev0/StikDebug For an undergrad project, I suppose it&amp;#39;s fine to conveniently forget about the existence of this solution for the sake of getting a good grade.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; and expressed concerns that such &amp;#34;JavaScript junk&amp;#34; remains unusable on older hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48721159&quot; title=&quot;yet on real old hardware it would be 20x slower in real life.  same as all native javascript junk - its fast, but non usuable on older hardware&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722708&quot; title=&quot;Here&amp;#39;s a nickel kid. Go buy yourself a real computer.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/why-did-this-journal-retract-two-1940s-papers-by-max-planck/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why did this journal retract two 1940s papers by Max Planck?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (arstechnica.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48716634&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;208 points · 27 comments · by DR_MING&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The journal *The Science of Nature* retracted two 1940s papers by physicist Max Planck, likely due to automated algorithms misidentifying historical republication practices and cataloging ambiguities as modern copyright violations or &amp;#34;duplicate publications.&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/why-did-this-journal-retract-two-1940s-papers-by-max-planck/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Why did this journal retract two 1940s papers by Max Planck?    URL Source: https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/why-did-this-journal-retract-two-1940s-papers-by-max-planck/    Published Time: 2026-06-28T18:49:21+00:00    Markdown Content:  [Skip to content](https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/why-did-this-journal-retract-two-1940s-papers-by-max-planck/#main)    a bot-ched decision?    Clicking on the links now reveals blank pages and empty PDFs. “Intellectually, it’s not acceptable.”    Max…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The retraction of Max Planck’s 1940s papers was due to alleged copyright violations and &amp;#34;self-plagiarism,&amp;#34; a practice that was common at the time to reach broader audiences but is now flagged by modern automated systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48716988&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The specific reason for the retractions was copyright violation, so there was nothing wrong with the actual papers from a scientific standpoint. There is a reason why the German portmanteau word &amp;#39;Zensurheberrecht&amp;#39; (&amp;#39;Zensur&amp;#39;: censorship; &amp;#39;Urheberrecht&amp;#39;: the related concept to copyright in German law) exists.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48717447&quot; title=&quot;The so-called copyright violation was that Max Planck had published the same article in 2 journals, which was not unusual at that time, because different journals had different readerships, so publishing in more journals was necessary if you wanted to reach more people. So supposedly he plagiarized himself. The second retracted article was even less justifiable, because the modern editors or their automated system had believed that 2 articles were the same, but they were not, they only happened…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters largely criticize the concept of self-plagiarism as a tool for journals to protect their interests rather than a valid scientific concern, noting that one of the papers was likely retracted in error because it merely shared a title with another work &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48717447&quot; title=&quot;The so-called copyright violation was that Max Planck had published the same article in 2 journals, which was not unusual at that time, because different journals had different readerships, so publishing in more journals was necessary if you wanted to reach more people. So supposedly he plagiarized himself. The second retracted article was even less justifiable, because the modern editors or their automated system had believed that 2 articles were the same, but they were not, they only happened…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48718148&quot; title=&quot;While commonly taught in academic settings, I disagree with the notion that it&amp;#39;s possible to self plagiarize. It&amp;#39;s your own words and not stealing from somebody else.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48718636&quot; title=&quot;It seems like a rule designed by journal editors to protect their turf, or PhD committees to make it easier to count original works towards degree requirements. What could possibly be the justification?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a meta-discussion regarding the &amp;#34;clickbait&amp;#34; nature of the article&amp;#39;s title, with users suggesting that general audiences may not be as familiar with Planck&amp;#39;s historical significance as the Hacker News community &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48716998&quot; title=&quot;I notice how the title by Ars Technica is much less baity than Nature: &amp;#39;Why have papers by one of history’s most famous physicists been retracted?&amp;#39; vs &amp;#39;Why did this journal retract two 1940s papers by Max Planck?&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48717110&quot; title=&quot;It’s almost like Nature doesn’t expect its readers to know who this Max Planck guy is. :-)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719183&quot; title=&quot;Exactly, it seems that HN can assume a certain level of scientific knowledge among its readers that Nature can&amp;#39;t.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-06-28</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-06-28</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/double-threat-to-private-communications-undemocratic-chat-control-backroom-deals-and-imminent-concessions-spark-relaunch-of-fightchatcontrol-eu/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;EU to legislate about Chat Control behind closed doors&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (patrick-breyer.de)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707719&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;635 points · 358 comments · by NeutralForest&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Civil rights activist Dr. Patrick Breyer is warning of a &amp;#34;double threat&amp;#34; to digital privacy as EU leadership allegedly uses backroom deals to resurrect mass message scanning and end anonymous communication despite previous parliamentary rejections. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/double-threat-to-private-communications-undemocratic-chat-control-backroom-deals-and-imminent-concessions-spark-relaunch-of-fightchatcontrol-eu/&quot; title=&quot;Title: “Double Threat” to Private Communications: Undemocratic Chat Control Backroom Deals and Imminent Concessions Spark Relaunch of fightchatcontrol.eu    URL Source: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/double-threat-to-private-communications-undemocratic-chat-control-backroom-deals-and-imminent-concessions-spark-relaunch-of-fightchatcontrol-eu/    Published Time: 2026-06-28T14:02:16+02:00    Markdown Content:  **Civil rights activist Dr. Patrick Breyer warns of an unprecedented “double-attack” on…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are sharply divided on the EU&amp;#39;s regulatory approach, with some arguing that &amp;#34;Chat Control&amp;#34; and similar mandates stifle innovation, erode privacy, and reflect a fundamental misunderstanding of free speech &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708008&quot; title=&quot;First, why does the EU leadership refuse to learn from falling behind the US economically and technologically, most starkly with AI recently, and their failures in regulating the Internet, most annoyingly the cookie law? And why aren&amp;#39;t you, the EU citizen, more annoyed by it? I see a lot of pro-EU content on this site when they&amp;#39;re terrible on both tech and entrepreneurship. Second, what&amp;#39;s up with Denmmark pushing for it here? They&amp;#39;re usually very reasonable.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708555&quot; title=&quot;The global push to kill privacy makes me sad. Feels like I grew up in a golden age and subsequent generations won&amp;#39;t care because they never knew a different world&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708383&quot; title=&quot;The education system has failed in the EU, but in a different way than it has in the US. I realised this when people thought mandating the USB-C connections was a good idea because &amp;#39;it is the best standard&amp;#39;. I didn&amp;#39;t think the mandated connector was a huge deal per se, but it made it clear to me that there is a flawed thought process behind EU regulations. And this is a big deal. Many things are not really understood in the EU. The majority don&amp;#39;t seem to understand free speech.  The EU has an…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users defend regulations like the cookie law and USB-C standardization for improving consumer transparency and convenience &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708058&quot; title=&quot;European here. I like the cookie law. It&amp;#39;s made it clear to people how much we&amp;#39;re being tracked and I can choose to opt out. The implementation could of course be better but the real issue is the scummy web devs choosing to make it as annoying as possible instead of taking the more sensible decision to not have 150 trackers on every page. &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I see a lot of pro-EU content on this site when they&amp;#39;re terrible on both tech and entrepreneurship. Life is bigger than tech or entrepreneurship. In the…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708423&quot; title=&quot;Of all things to criticise, you pick out the one ruling that eventually lead to a consolidation of chargers? Really? I haven&amp;#39;t ever met a single person who wasn&amp;#39;t grateful of being able to have one cable for all their devices.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend these policies represent a &amp;#34;short-term view&amp;#34; that blocks the discovery of superior future technologies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708507&quot; title=&quot;This is exactly what I&amp;#39;m talking about. A short-term view of the world, progress and technology. All my devices supported USB-C before the EU regulation. But if I wanted to buy a device with a new type of connector, I should have been able to. This is how the USB-C came to be and how any new standard in hardware happens. New technologies are made and just sold, and if they are proven to be superior to others in the market, they often become standards. The USB-C standard is not the best standard…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a notable consensus that these &amp;#34;behind closed doors&amp;#34; actions fuel anti-EU sentiment, though some attribute the blame to national politicians using the EU as a shield to pursue unpopular policies without accountability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708093&quot; title=&quot;This is going to further increase anti-EU sentiment. This is unacceptable behaviour, but no politician is ever going to experience any negative consequences over this because they&amp;#39;re so very far removed from the democratic process.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708468&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This is going to further increase anti-EU sentiment. Rightfully so. Except for no-roaming-charges within EU, most people can&amp;#39;t name one good regulation that came from EU and couldn&amp;#39;t be handled individually by their own country in the last few decades. The latest example is 3eur customs tax per every item bought from china, even if it&amp;#39;s a 1eur phone case (1eur + 3eur customs + 22% vat on both.... what&amp;#39;s the added value of custom tax? who knows, but you pay it anyway). Add all the money…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708494&quot; title=&quot;Most of the time, when &amp;#39;the EU&amp;#39; is doing something bad, it&amp;#39;s actually the national governments wearing a different hat. The Parliament is pretty reasonable on the average, while the national policicians in the Council take advantage of the ignorance of the public. They can pursue their favorite policies without consequences, as the EU gets all the blame.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://semgrep.dev/blog/2026/we-have-mythos-at-home-glm-52-beats-claude-in-our-cyber-benchmarks/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GLM 5.2 beats Claude in our benchmarks&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (semgrep.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48709670&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;666 points · 321 comments · by jms703&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Zhipu AI’s open-weight model, GLM 5.2, outperformed Claude Code in a security benchmark for detecting IDOR vulnerabilities, achieving a 39% F1 score compared to Claude&amp;#39;s 32%. While Semgrep’s custom multimodal pipeline remains the top performer, GLM 5.2 offers a cost-effective, high-performance alternative for sensitive security tasks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://semgrep.dev/blog/2026/we-have-mythos-at-home-glm-52-beats-claude-in-our-cyber-benchmarks/&quot; title=&quot;Title: We have Mythos at Home: GLM 5.2 beats Claude in our Cyber Benchmarks    URL Source: https://semgrep.dev/blog/2026/we-have-mythos-at-home-glm-52-beats-claude-in-our-cyber-benchmarks/    Markdown Content:  We ran a set of popular open-source models against our IDOR benchmark, the same dataset and the same prompt we&amp;#39;ve used to evaluate frontier coding agents. The result surprised us: GLM 5.2, an open-weight model from Zhipu AI, scored a 39% F1 on IDOR detection, beating Claude Code (32%) at…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GLM 5.2 is praised as a high-performance &amp;#34;workhorse&amp;#34; for programming and security tasks, with some users finding it more cost-effective and capable for complex agentic workflows than current frontier models from OpenAI or Anthropic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48712124&quot; title=&quot;I have taken another look on these open models after the fiasco of Fable and GPT 5.6 this weekend and... GLM-5.2 truly is a good workhorse model for daily programming. I consider myself a heavy user of LLMs and a seasoned developer. A typical session for me with GPT is usually over a hundred dollars... This weekend I programmed a matrix bot with encryption and a Rust agent with some tools. Because I need one and OpenClaw just felt... not what I wanted. Two days later and 20 dollars poorer I…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48711297&quot; title=&quot;These numbers are seem pretty low compared to what I was able to achieve specifically around windows kernel, win32k&amp;lt;-&amp;gt;win32u to be exact. It honestly wouldn&amp;#39;t surprise me anymore if china started surpassing models that US makes public, at least in specific categories such as cyber. GLM 5.2 is already capable enough to assist in self-training which is similar to what we saw happen with frontier models and they appear to be getting there at a significantly lower cost than openai/anthropic.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While it excels in performance-to-cost ratios, some evaluators note a gap between its public benchmark scores and real-world multi-agent coding performance, suggesting it still trails slightly behind the latest proprietary models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48713146&quot; title=&quot;GLM 5.2 is a great model, but if you only want to use the best model available, it isn&amp;#39;t there yet. Every lab releases models that memorize benchmark answers, both intentionally and unintentionally. But we consistently find that models from Chinese labs have a wider gap between public benchmarks and our evaluations, which we designed to be less vulnerable to benchmaxxing. In multi-agent coding environments, GLM 5.2 is just shy of Opus 4.6 on average. Data at https://gertlabs.com/rankings But…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48712434&quot; title=&quot;I added GLM 5.2 to my security bug hunting benchmark when it came out, and found it to be a good performer, but not the best open model. The benchmark tests whether models can find bugs Mythos found. The best open models in the initial benchmark were DeepSeek V4 Pro or MiMo 2.5 Pro. But it turned out MiMo got lucky, it&amp;#39;s performed worse on almost every test I&amp;#39;ve done since, while DeepSeek has consistently been among the best performers and its extreme caching performance makes it cheaper than…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also highlights the significant hardware barriers to running the 753B parameter model locally, with estimates suggesting a $100,000 investment in GPUs that may not be economically justifiable compared to using hosted API providers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48711804&quot; title=&quot;Apparently GLM 5.2 is 753B parameters [1], what kind of hardware are people using to run this locally? [1] https://huggingface.co/zai-org/GLM-5.2&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48712086&quot; title=&quot;8 X RTX6000.  It will run you around 80-100k to get started with a model at this size with decent tps.. Don&amp;#39;t worry though, open source evangelists will tell you that these will be running on your phone in the next 3 years. For $100k you could run this model 24/7 through open router with 10 concurrent sessions at 50tps  for a decade and have money left over for a vacation. There&amp;#39;s no point in investing this type of money in local models unless you have a business where you&amp;#39;re already paying for…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48712115&quot; title=&quot;you can however, have fun with it. oil workers buy 100k trucks they do not-much with. why not a 100k in computer?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://antoine.fi/mri-analysis-using-claude-code-opus&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I used Claude Code to get a second opinion on my MRI&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (antoine.fi)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708941&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;395 points · &lt;strong&gt;514 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by engmarketer&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A patient used Claude Code and Opus 4.8 to analyze MRI DICOM files, discovering that the AI disputed a doctor&amp;#39;s diagnosis of a Grade III tendon tear. While the AI found no tear, the author remains in &amp;#34;limbo&amp;#34; regarding which medical opinion to trust for treatment. &lt;a href=&quot;https://antoine.fi/mri-analysis-using-claude-code-opus&quot; title=&quot;Title: Using Opus 4.8 to get a second opinion on an MRI and where it leaves me    URL Source: https://antoine.fi/mri-analysis-using-claude-code-opus    Published Time: 2026-06-28T17:27:43+02:00    Markdown Content:  This article is about my experience using Opus 4.8 to read the results of an MRI and give me a sort of second opinion on the diagnosis. Of course, I know the technology might not be there yet, which is why I&amp;#39;m sharing this article. Maybe it can help someone or at least provide a bit of…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a sharp divide between users who find AI useful for medical second opinions and experts who warn that its output is often &amp;#34;insufficient, incomplete, or outright misleading&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48709182&quot; title=&quot;I feel like I&amp;#39;m going nuts. There are other commenters saying this is a good practice they&amp;#39;ve also done for other injuries. You are saying you are an actual radiologist and immediately clock the problems with its advice. I have seen this pattern over and over again. Anytime someone is an actual expert at anything, AI output appears insufficient or incomplete or outright misleading. It is only when you do not know what the AI is being asked to do is it likely you will find the output helpful.…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48709434&quot; title=&quot;This is the root of AI psychosis. There’s a lot of unpack here, and I won’t go too deep because you can’t really have a discussion with affected folks because their fundamental basis is not evidence, it’s belief. It is weirdly religious in a way, because if you were to present contrary evidence (e.g. experts in a field weighing in about how plausible sounding responses are bunk), you would only be told you don’t believe enough in the long term potential and capabilities. Don’t get me wrong, I…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. A radiologist points out that AI and patients often misinterpret medical jargon and the limitations of specific imaging modalities, such as ultrasound versus radiographs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48709121&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m a radiologist but can&amp;#39;t really weigh in without seeing the full 3D MRI dataset. Regarding this point: &amp;gt; They performed shockwave therapy on my shoulder even though a recent clinical practice guideline says clinicians should not use or recommend shockwave therapy for rotator-cuff tendinopathy without calcification; I was told during ultrasound that there was no calcification. Ultrasound isn&amp;#39;t a great way to assess for calcification. It&amp;#39;ll find large calcification but easily miss small ones.…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48710573&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; So an ultrasound report can state there are no calcifications while a plain radiograph can report the presence of calcifications without being inconsistent. Obviously very confusing to patients and people unfamiliar with medical jargon This is being overly nice, I think. Anyone who doesn&amp;#39;t understand this is an idiot imo. You would have to assume that every type of diagnosis instrument has infinite clarity and is always correct to be confused in this case. Reminds me of the Babbage quote…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that the &amp;#34;AI psychosis&amp;#34; of trusting probabilistic models over human expertise is dangerous, while others debate whether future model performance will be limited by data poisoning or improved through expert-curated datasets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48709434&quot; title=&quot;This is the root of AI psychosis. There’s a lot of unpack here, and I won’t go too deep because you can’t really have a discussion with affected folks because their fundamental basis is not evidence, it’s belief. It is weirdly religious in a way, because if you were to present contrary evidence (e.g. experts in a field weighing in about how plausible sounding responses are bunk), you would only be told you don’t believe enough in the long term potential and capabilities. Don’t get me wrong, I…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48710293&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;This is the root of AI psychosis. There’s a lot of unpack here, and I won’t go too deep because you can’t really have a discussion with affected folks because their fundamental basis is not evidence, it’s belief.  Treating it as if it is an intelligence is the problem. The problem is that AI psychosis is fundamentally the belief that an LLM is &amp;#39;thinking&amp;#39; at all.  Outputs are just believable word vomit which resembles factual information.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48709853&quot; title=&quot;I don’t think they will improve, there is too much incentive to poison the datasets going forward. A lot of the models up to this point have been benefitted - like Google did - from essentially ‘pre SEO’ internet. Now the same tools are being used to generate nigh infinite good sounding bullshit, which poisons the dataset in all sorts of hard to detect ways. To add insult to injury, the human experts are also not as. Naive, and have many incentives to poison their own input in subtle ways too.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48710107&quot; title=&quot;I seriously doubt that data set poisoning will be a real limiter in model performance. For one, if your website/book is poisoned, who is going to trust it for anything at all, much less for training models? For two, all the major AI labs hire or contract for subject matter experts to create curated data sets, evaluate model performance, etc. Unless they hire malicious experts, this will provide a growing, high quality data set that should drown out any poisoned pretraining data.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://english.elpais.com/education/2026-06-28/ai-fraud-at-brown-university-academic-integrity-is-at-risk.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Professor denounces mass AI fraud on an exam at Brown&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (english.elpais.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708991&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;352 points · &lt;strong&gt;465 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by geox&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Brown University economics professor Roberto Serrano has denounced massive AI-driven cheating on a midterm exam, criticizing the university&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;cold&amp;#34; response to evidence that at least 50 students used ChatGPT to commit fraud in an advanced undergraduate course. &lt;a href=&quot;https://english.elpais.com/education/2026-06-28/ai-fraud-at-brown-university-academic-integrity-is-at-risk.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Professor denounces mass AI fraud on an exam at Brown University: ‘Academic integrity is at risk’    URL Source: https://english.elpais.com/education/2026-06-28/ai-fraud-at-brown-university-academic-integrity-is-at-risk.html    Published Time: 2026-06-28T06:30:00+02:00    Markdown Content:  The temptation to [use artificial intelligence (AI) to cheat](https://english.elpais.com/technology/2025-09-24/people-cheat-much-more-if-they-use-ai-its-a-level-of-deception-we-havent-seen-before.html…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of AI-driven academic fraud has led to a consensus that take-home, closed-book exams are no longer viable &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48712010&quot; title=&quot;In the AI era, tests are going to have to be in person and hand written. I have written an article on how I have adjusted my classes to the situation: https://htmx.org/essays/universities-and-ai/ Ironically, I think the AI era may make university degrees a better signal of the intellectual abilities of students due to the presence of pre-computer infrastructure like large lecture halls, industrial-scale copiers, etc.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48711958&quot; title=&quot;take-home, closed-book type What an oxymoron. I agree with the others here that AI isn&amp;#39;t the problem.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48709654&quot; title=&quot;Damn that&amp;#39;s crazy. Guess the take home test is dead now. I never understood this behavior from undergrads though, you&amp;#39;re paying so much for an education and then you just skip the education part? Why bother?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Educators and observers suggest returning to in-person, handwritten, or air-gapped computer testing to ensure academic integrity, though some argue handwriting is an inefficient bottleneck for expressing ideas &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48712010&quot; title=&quot;In the AI era, tests are going to have to be in person and hand written. I have written an article on how I have adjusted my classes to the situation: https://htmx.org/essays/universities-and-ai/ Ironically, I think the AI era may make university degrees a better signal of the intellectual abilities of students due to the presence of pre-computer infrastructure like large lecture halls, industrial-scale copiers, etc.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48712221&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; In the AI era, tests are going to have to be in person and hand written. Forcing hand written should really not be necessary. It would be very cheap in terms of old computing hardware to set up a test room with old desktop PCs that have wired only NICs (with a network connection that goes to a switch in the same room with no uplink, connected to a decent size laser printer only), running something like lubuntu and libreoffice writer as a basic word processor. Let people at least type their…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48712325&quot; title=&quot;I’m 30 and “we can’t do tests in paper” seems _insane_. Just how metastatic has ed tech been in what, 9 years since my undergrad?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48712360&quot; title=&quot;I’m 40 and forcing students to do handwritten essays during tests has always been stupid. Typing is much faster, why bottleneck ideas by forcing handwriting?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond testing formats, some professors are shifting toward adversarial course design and one-on-one interviews to verify student comprehension &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48712708&quot; title=&quot;I have seen it firsthand in the CS department here at Dartmouth. It is bad. We&amp;#39;re currently designing a new intro systems curriculum, and we&amp;#39;re thinking of it as an adversarial problem. That is, we&amp;#39;re designing the course to ensure that a student optimizing for the best grade per unit work still meets our learning objectives. That means, as everyone else is saying, paper exams, but also 1-on-1 interviews to check that students understand each assignment they turn in. These interviews feature…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, while others question the utility of grading entirely if it serves primarily as free labor for corporate screening &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48712814&quot; title=&quot;As a university professor, I honestly don&amp;#39;t understand the point of grading. Who will look at and care about grades? Likely company HR. But then why should we (professors) do the screening for companies for free? Also, grades have long been inflated to a point we might as well just give everyone an A and let companies figure out how to select people.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Many participants note that students often feel forced to cheat to remain competitive in curved grading environments where they assume their peers are already using AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48710256&quot; title=&quot;When you&amp;#39;re a student in a competitive program at a top university, graded on a curve, and you know your fellow classmates are cheating with AI, you have little choice but to do the same. Especially when jobs for new grads are harder to come by and there&amp;#39;s more pressure to also go above and beyond with internships and side projects during your time in school. There&amp;#39;s no way to compete without cheating.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48712708&quot; title=&quot;I have seen it firsthand in the CS department here at Dartmouth. It is bad. We&amp;#39;re currently designing a new intro systems curriculum, and we&amp;#39;re thinking of it as an adversarial problem. That is, we&amp;#39;re designing the course to ensure that a student optimizing for the best grade per unit work still meets our learning objectives. That means, as everyone else is saying, paper exams, but also 1-on-1 interviews to check that students understand each assignment they turn in. These interviews feature…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/06/kids-act-would-require-age-checks-get-online&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The KIDS Act would require age checks to get online&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (eff.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48706560&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;415 points · 328 comments · by bilsbie&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The KIDS Act is a proposed federal bill that would mandate age verification for internet users, a move critics argue threatens online privacy and anonymity. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/06/kids-act-would-require-age-checks-get-online&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;act.eff.org&amp;amp;#x2F;action&amp;amp;#x2F;tell-congress-don-t-force-age-checks-online&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;act.eff.org&amp;amp;#x2F;action&amp;amp;#x2F;tell-congress-don-t-force-age-che...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The proposed KIDS Act has sparked debate over whether age verification is a necessary safeguard against &amp;#34;addictionware&amp;#34; and harmful content &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707063&quot; title=&quot;EDIT: about half to two thirds of the responders didn&amp;#39;t catch &amp;#39;I&amp;#39;m not a fan of these proposed solutions.&amp;#39; I am not saying I like these solutions. I am trying to explain why they have support among the general public. Many of these responses are the usual &amp;#39;shoot the messenger&amp;#39; response you get online when you point out what the &amp;#39;other side&amp;#39; thinks and why they think it even if you don&amp;#39;t necessarily agree . On this issue I think there&amp;#39;s a need, but I have yet to see a good proposal to address…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707243&quot; title=&quot;That sounds like a reasonable aim. Online services should be responsible for implementing age verification checks on content that children shouldn&amp;#39;t be accessing, just like vendors of alcohol and nicotine products are responsible for age verification. The EFF likes to frame everything that might even slightly rein in online service providers as being a terrible assault on online freedom and therefore, in their view, shouldn&amp;#39;t be done. But I don&amp;#39;t see them coming up with any better solutions.…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt; or a tactical erosion of privacy that targets children because they lack the perspective to resist &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707022&quot; title=&quot;Targeting the kids is so infuriatingly successful tactics. It gives the adults the option to be apathetic. In reality, anyone who is a kid now will never know any better. It just means we&amp;#39;re the last generations that had the luxury of a world that remembered what privacy was.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the tech industry’s failure to provide parental tools necessitates government intervention &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707063&quot; title=&quot;EDIT: about half to two thirds of the responders didn&amp;#39;t catch &amp;#39;I&amp;#39;m not a fan of these proposed solutions.&amp;#39; I am not saying I like these solutions. I am trying to explain why they have support among the general public. Many of these responses are the usual &amp;#39;shoot the messenger&amp;#39; response you get online when you point out what the &amp;#39;other side&amp;#39; thinks and why they think it even if you don&amp;#39;t necessarily agree . On this issue I think there&amp;#39;s a need, but I have yet to see a good proposal to address…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48714298&quot; title=&quot;Parents won&amp;#39;t parent without a change in incentives. That&amp;#39;s why giving children access to social media must be punished to the same degree as giving children heroin. If it&amp;#39;s a parent&amp;#39;s responsibility, it must be made a parent&amp;#39;s liability. Anything without the full threat of the government&amp;#39;s monopoly on violence is just a pretty slogan. We should see access to social media as the neglect that it is.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others question the underlying narrative, noting a lack of clear longitudinal evidence linking social media to mental health crises &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48710623&quot; title=&quot;I just listened to a radio program on my local NPR station about the topic of kids and social media.  From what was presented, the research shows (longitudinal study) that there is very little evidence of social media impacting mental health--which is shocking because a majority of adults think there is a connection and the politicians are pushing that narrative. I have not personally vetted the research.  Has anyone else?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics also suggest the bill’s scope may be narrower than activists claim, potentially exempting sites that do not use personal data for recommendations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48712715&quot; title=&quot;Would this website (HN) be a &amp;#39;covered platform&amp;#39; according to the bill? As far as I can tell, the answer is no, because it doesn&amp;#39;t do what&amp;#39;s described in Section 201 (E): &amp;#39;Uses the personal information of the user to advertise, market, or make content recommendations.&amp;#39; Neither does, for example, my bank&amp;#39;s website, or someone&amp;#39;s personal blog, or many other discussion sites like this one. So from what I can see, while the set of covered platforms is certainly not negligible, it&amp;#39;s still a lot…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, while others suspect the global push for such laws stems from international lobbying interests rather than organic concern &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48712209&quot; title=&quot;Anybody else think it is weird that suddenly all Western countries suddenly want to lockdown the internet to &amp;#39;protect the children&amp;#39;? There is surely an international special interest group lobbying for this?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.engadget.com/2203000/flock-cameras-recording-license-plate/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Flock cameras track more than your license plate, and they&amp;#39;re spreading fast&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (engadget.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707673&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;359 points · 267 comments · by SanjayMehta&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Flock Safety’s AI-powered surveillance cameras have expanded to over 100,000 locations nationwide, drawing intense criticism over significant security vulnerabilities, documented instances of police stalking, and AI errors that have led to the wrongful targeting of innocent citizens. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.engadget.com/2203000/flock-cameras-recording-license-plate/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Flock Cameras Track More Than Your License Plate, And They&amp;#39;re Spreading Fast    URL Source: https://www.engadget.com/2203000/flock-cameras-recording-license-plate/    Published Time: 2026-06-28T13:30:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  &amp;#39;You can&amp;#39;t get a breath of fresh air ... without us knowing.&amp;#39;    ![Image 1: a red and white sign for Automatic License Plate Reader (ALPR) system by Flock…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The proliferation of Flock cameras has sparked a debate over whether such surveillance is a necessary tool for urban safety or an invasive &amp;#34;1984 monitoring system&amp;#34; that bypasses traditional police oversight &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707968&quot; title=&quot;We need some way to address the low level crime in the US. If you look at cities in east Asia, they&amp;#39;re both much larger than typical US cities and much safer. It -is- possible to have safe large cities. The fact that we don&amp;#39;t is a choice.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708510&quot; title=&quot;What makes Flock bizarre is that it&amp;#39;s a private business, and this is precisely how police departments are getting around a lot of traditional gates and checks on this sort of thing. Police setting up a 1984 monitoring system throughout your city, tracking every car, person, activity -- yields lots of questions, oversight, concerns, debate, challenges, etc. Some private business doing the same, and then letting the same police use it at will as a paying customer -- yay, all of the invasive…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that East Asian cities achieve safety through similar extensive camera networks, others point out that safe cities existed long before this technology and that US crime concerns are often exaggerated by propaganda &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707968&quot; title=&quot;We need some way to address the low level crime in the US. If you look at cities in east Asia, they&amp;#39;re both much larger than typical US cities and much safer. It -is- possible to have safe large cities. The fact that we don&amp;#39;t is a choice.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708012&quot; title=&quot;US cities are plenty safe. The fact that you think otherwise is propaganda you’ve been successfully served. I live in Nyc and visit other cities often.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708031&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s even more amazing is that they had these safe cities without [Flock, Motorola, Axon]. I guess we will never know how they did it, but at least we get the Chinese surveillance state.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708134&quot; title=&quot;My experience in major East Asian cities (predominantly Tokyo and Taipei) is that they have extensive networks of surveillance cameras operated by or accessible to the police.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical critiques highlight that while basic computer vision for license plate reading is decades old, Flock’s private business model allows law enforcement to access pervasive tracking data without the typical public debate or checks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707829&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, I&amp;#39;m not a fan of these things. If they were just ALPRs, I could probably give them a bit of slack -if they tightened up their security-, but all the other stuff they do, makes them pretty much untenable. However: &amp;gt; This makes AI powered cameras like Flock&amp;#39;s distinct from traditional surveillance or traffic cams, which require someone to manually look over footage in order to find a specific vehicle or individual. Is a bit misleading. These days, anyone can give an LLM footage from any…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708712&quot; title=&quot;What LLM can I get and feed hundreds of hours of video into that will give me the position of a specific vehicle alongside when that happened? An LLM isn’t going to help you here, but basic Computer Vision and a SQL database has been a solution _if you have the cameras_. I wrote a license plate reader as a university project using OpenCV almost 20 years ago.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708510&quot; title=&quot;What makes Flock bizarre is that it&amp;#39;s a private business, and this is precisely how police departments are getting around a lot of traditional gates and checks on this sort of thing. Police setting up a 1984 monitoring system throughout your city, tracking every car, person, activity -- yields lots of questions, oversight, concerns, debate, challenges, etc. Some private business doing the same, and then letting the same police use it at will as a paying customer -- yay, all of the invasive…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite their rapid spread, advocacy groups have documented over 70 instances of local governments successfully banning these systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708964&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;re also getting banned fast. The city level should be the most accessible government for change. There&amp;#39;s been over 70[1] documented wins. Don&amp;#39;t feel like this is a lost cause, it clearly isn&amp;#39;t. If everyone who was going to comment on this thread instead or additionally got involved by going to a city council meeting and explaining the problems to friends/family, many more cities could reject them. [1] https://deflock.org/council/#wins&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jayacunzo.com/blog/your-move-chief&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The best response to AI slop and online noise is from Robin Williams&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jayacunzo.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48703452&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;379 points · 207 comments · by herbertl&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Drawing on Robin Williams’s iconic speech in *Good Will Hunting*, Jay Acunzo argues that lived experience and personal perspective are the only effective antidotes to AI-generated &amp;#34;slop,&amp;#34; emphasizing that while AI can process information, it cannot replicate the wisdom or emotional depth of human life. &lt;a href=&quot;https://jayacunzo.com/blog/your-move-chief&quot; title=&quot;Title: The best response to AI slop, infinite advice, and online noise is from Robin Williams    URL Source: https://jayacunzo.com/blog/your-move-chief    Published Time: 2026-06-18T13:29:13-0500    Markdown Content:  There&amp;#39;s a moment in the movie _Good Will Hunting_ which perfectly summarizes all the problems with AI slop and online noise and infinite advice content.    Sean (played by Robin Williams) is sitting next to Will (Matt Damon) on a bench in Boston Public Garden. I live here, so I know it…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether Robin Williams’ monologue in *Good Will Hunting* effectively critiques AI&amp;#39;s lack of lived experience, with some arguing that LLMs merely mimic human speech patterns without the capacity for genuine feeling or action &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48703843&quot; title=&quot;I agree. This Robin Williams monologue nails exactly why LLMs make us so uneasy. They speak fluently and confidently about experiences it’s impossible for them to have.  They can’t taste a strawberry or do any of the things Robin Williams names. There are a number of people building these machines who literally believe the machines will replace us and because they will be more powerful than us so nothing meaningful will be lost. They need to watch this clip. Even though they probably still…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48703892&quot; title=&quot;ChatGPT has taken to saying things like “What I would do now is…” or “if I were you I’d…”. I know these are figures of speech, but it reminds me that this thing doesn’t do anything, it doesn’t learn anything, it can’t try anything and find out.  And yet it uses speech patterns drawn from real humans who can and do all those things.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics of this view point out that the monologue itself is a fictional performance by actors who had not experienced the specific traumas described, suggesting that storytelling ability can resonate deeply regardless of personal history &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48704111&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a well-written monologue, with a fabulous delivery, but I think it fails spectacularly for this argument. From what I just looked into, neither of the main people involved, including Damon, Affleck, Williams, Van Sant, Reiner or Goldman, had personally experienced those scenarios of fighting on the front lines and having a friend die in their arms, or of losing their spouse to cancer. But nevertheless, they had used their storytelling ability to write and deliver words based upon the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48703877&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s a movie. The whole thing is fiction. Robin Williams memorized the whole monologue, or was reading que cards.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48704619&quot; title=&quot;When Robin gave that performance, he was 47 years old. He&amp;#39;d been married twice. He&amp;#39;d been addicted to cocaine, and had partied with John Belushi the night he died from an overdose - which drove him to clean up his act. Was some of his performance made up? Absolutely. Was he overreaching? Definitely. You can&amp;#39;t know what a war zone is like until you&amp;#39;ve been in one. Words can&amp;#39;t describe the strange normalcy that only gets dispelled (rather uneasily) when you leave the area, or how the rest of the…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, the thread explores whether the emotional impact of a work matters more than the &amp;#34;authenticity&amp;#34; of its source, and whether AI might eventually &amp;#34;mature&amp;#34; into a more genuine form of expression &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48704015&quot; title=&quot;I believe AI is in a &amp;#39;curious toddler&amp;#39; stage of itself. I believe it will &amp;#39;mature&amp;#39; emotionally as the generations evolve over time. Like humans it will have growing pains like &amp;#39;phases&amp;#39;. Curious toddler. Then adolescent. Then angsty teen. Then an overconfident young adult. And finally an adult who understands themselves emotionally and grows truly wiser over time. I think all this is going to happen over 5-10 years rather than 30 for humans. Hopefully our angsty teen doesn&amp;#39;t kill us in our sleep.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48703931&quot; title=&quot;If we are moved emotionally by slop, does it matter? If AI can produce something to make you think and feel, does it matter? It made you think and feel.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.marfapublicradio.org/podcast/marfa-public-radio-puts-you-to-sleep&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Marfa Public Radio Puts You to Sleep&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (marfapublicradio.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48703759&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;396 points · 119 comments · by reaperducer&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Marfa Public Radio has launched a sleep podcast that features staff members reading dry, technical documents—such as FCC regulations and style guides—to lull listeners to sleep while promoting its fall membership drive. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.marfapublicradio.org/podcast/marfa-public-radio-puts-you-to-sleep&quot; title=&quot;Title: Marfa Public Radio Puts You to Sleep    URL Source: https://www.marfapublicradio.org/podcast/marfa-public-radio-puts-you-to-sleep    Markdown Content:  [Skip to main content](https://www.marfapublicradio.org/podcast/marfa-public-radio-puts-you-to-sleep#main)    [![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users discuss various &amp;#34;sleep-inducing&amp;#34; audio content, ranging from the genuinely boring to fictional baseball broadcasts and the BBC’s rhythmic &amp;#34;Shipping Forecast&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48704663&quot; title=&quot;There is a similar podcast, &amp;#39;Boring Books for Bedtime&amp;#39;: https://www.boringbookspod.com/episodes . The problem with that podcast is that most of their selections are genuinely interesting - I even listened to them on long drives (e.g. &amp;#39;Origin of Species&amp;#39;). Even something I thought would boring like or  &amp;#39;Farm Engines and how to Run&amp;#39; them turned out to be fascinating. This one, on the other hand, seems to be genuinely boring. I couldn&amp;#39;t get past the intro.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48706435&quot; title=&quot;Northwoods Baseball Radio Network is my favorite. It’s a fictional baseball league based primarily in Wisconsin. Games are called by a droning announcer. Even the fake commercials between innings are monotonous. I listen to it during the day too. I’m very tempted to score some of the games, but I’m a little worried I’d find holes like only 2 outs in an inning or missing innings in a game. https://www.sleepbaseball.com/&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48705466&quot; title=&quot;Not sure how accessible all this is outside of the UK (you&amp;#39;d need to check the BBC Sounds website &amp;amp; app), but the BBC has perfected a couple of great &amp;#39;gets you to sleep&amp;#39; radio outlets. The oldest is Radio 4, the BBC&amp;#39;s national spoken word radio station (there&amp;#39;s also Radio 5 which focuses on sport and news, Radio 4 is more a mixture of comedy, arts, culture and news). Late at night (UK time), there are programmes that were for many years my soundtrack to getting to sleep - news, a short…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some find dry educational topics like physics or biology perfect for rest, others note that high-quality content can inadvertently become too captivating for sleep &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48704663&quot; title=&quot;There is a similar podcast, &amp;#39;Boring Books for Bedtime&amp;#39;: https://www.boringbookspod.com/episodes . The problem with that podcast is that most of their selections are genuinely interesting - I even listened to them on long drives (e.g. &amp;#39;Origin of Species&amp;#39;). Even something I thought would boring like or  &amp;#39;Farm Engines and how to Run&amp;#39; them turned out to be fascinating. This one, on the other hand, seems to be genuinely boring. I couldn&amp;#39;t get past the intro.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48704964&quot; title=&quot;A similar one I recently discovered is https://www.youtube.com/@SleepOnPhysics . I think it was meant to put you to sleep with the detailed narrative, but I found it to be very interesting and captivating, especially for long drives.  The content quality is pretty good, I am almost certain the audio is AI generated, but wonder how the content itself was authored.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical frustrations include the lack of simple UI for tracking progress across nights and the jarring disruption of loud advertisements on platforms like YouTube &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48704286&quot; title=&quot;i want a sleep app that reads me things that will put me to sleep, but i need it to track when i may have gone to sleep, or more importantly when I have not, so i can restart the next night past the point i&amp;#39;ve listened to. but it needs to be some crazy simple UI, i don&amp;#39;t want the light on my phone to turn on, i don&amp;#39;t want to fiddle, just skip forward, skip back, that&amp;#39;s about it there&amp;#39;s all sorts of stuff that is dry but interesting that I&amp;#39;d like to plow through over time, a few paragraphs a day…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48705306&quot; title=&quot;In the middle the YouTube Advertisements starts playing at a louder volume and you wake up :)&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48706315&quot; title=&quot;Amazes me how people in a tech industry paying six figures refuse to pay a tiny percentage of their income to get rid of adverts on something that consumes so much time.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cbsnews.com/detroit/news/workplace-boundaries-act-employees-after-hours/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Michigan bill would bar employers from requiring after-hours coms with workers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cbsnews.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707769&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;248 points · 203 comments · by cebert&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Michigan Legislature is considering the Workplace Employee Boundaries Act, a bill that would prohibit employers from requiring workers to respond to after-hours communications, such as emails and texts, unless compensated for on-call time or during state and federal emergencies. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cbsnews.com/detroit/news/workplace-boundaries-act-employees-after-hours/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Michigan bill would bar employers from requiring after-hours contact with workers    URL Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/detroit/news/workplace-boundaries-act-employees-after-hours/    Published Time: 2026-06-24T14:03:26-0400    Markdown Content:  [](https://www.cbsnews.com/detroit/news/workplace-boundaries-act-employees-after-hours/#site-header:37)[](https://www.cbsnews.com/detroit/news/workplace-boundaries-act-employees-after-hours/#x)    *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide between workers who maintain strict boundaries using separate devices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708127&quot; title=&quot;Second phone?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708204&quot; title=&quot;Indeed.  If $job is not willing to buy and hand me a &amp;#39;work phone&amp;#39; then they are out of luck, nothing for $job gets put onto my private phone.  If they think they need this ability, then they also need to add a line item to their budgets for the cost of the phone and the service.  And when faced with this alternative, they have not, so far, decided they want to pay for a phone.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708499&quot; title=&quot;Maybe I just have abnormal leverage but I&amp;#39;ve never had after hours coms be an issue. I&amp;#39;ve had two phone for basically all my working life and just don&amp;#39;t look at it outside of work hours. Don&amp;#39;t think I&amp;#39;ve ever been challenged on why are you not reading after hour messages. Everyone around me is professional enough to know that its a discussion that would go poorly.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt; and those who argue that &amp;#34;always-on&amp;#34; expectations are a pervasive reality for many, often driven by professional privilege or specific job demands &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48709353&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s a weird incuriosity in the responses here for a place that calls itself Hacker News. &amp;#39;This doesn&amp;#39;t happen to me&amp;#39; is about the least interesting or useful response you could have to someone telling you something happens to them. Someone is telling you the world works differently for them than it does for you, which means you&amp;#39;ve got an opportunity to learn something new about the world and expand your model. Every good hack comes from understanding the world well enough to see the hack in…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48709001&quot; title=&quot;Lots of privilege in this thread showing. This is the equivalent of &amp;#39;what global warming, it was so cold today&amp;#39;. Please remember that just because you aren&amp;#39;t expected to have consistent unpaid after-hours comms doesn&amp;#39;t mean that others don&amp;#39;t. Bills like this would help a lot of people who are victims of &amp;#39;can you just take a look at this real quick&amp;#39; at 6pm. It does need to be at the country level though, otherwise employers will just play off states against each other.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users believe these issues are best handled through individual leverage or compensation rather than legislation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48710329&quot; title=&quot;I think stuff like this is much better settled with compensation than legislation. For example when I was an engineer 15-20 years ago, my friends would deprioritize jobs with lots of on-call needs, but would still take the jobs if they were exceptional in some way or the comp was especially good. Why can&amp;#39;t we do that in most other job categories as well? I can think of a bunch of areas where this kind of bill would degrade people&amp;#39;s experiences with businesses: - handoffs will suck. Someone&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48709151&quot; title=&quot;Most of the roles I&amp;#39;ve had involved irregular and long hours. In most cases, I&amp;#39;ve been happy to take these roles. The article isn&amp;#39;t clear how exactly this is intended to work. I think no surprise hours that aren&amp;#39;t recognized in the terms of employment makes sense. But also I think I should be able to agree to being available if I am willing to be. Remote Michigan tech workers already have enough trouble as tech companies insist on returning to office.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others advocate for legal protections to prevent employers from exploiting unpaid labor &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48709001&quot; title=&quot;Lots of privilege in this thread showing. This is the equivalent of &amp;#39;what global warming, it was so cold today&amp;#39;. Please remember that just because you aren&amp;#39;t expected to have consistent unpaid after-hours comms doesn&amp;#39;t mean that others don&amp;#39;t. Bills like this would help a lot of people who are victims of &amp;#39;can you just take a look at this real quick&amp;#39; at 6pm. It does need to be at the country level though, otherwise employers will just play off states against each other.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Disagreements also exist regarding personal responsibility, with some suggesting users should utilize software tools to manage notifications &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708100&quot; title=&quot;Android used to have an &amp;#39;office hours&amp;#39; setting which would prevent specific email accounts from notifying you outside of your specified times. I had my work GMail set to notify only between 0800 (so I could check for a &amp;#39;don&amp;#39;t come in&amp;#39; message) and 1700 Mon-Fri. Of course, it didn&amp;#39;t account for holidays / sick leave etc, but it was good at prevent me from panic checking every ping. I wish that was a feature on modern Gmail. Or, indeed, WhatsApp and Signal. You can manually mute, but there&amp;#39;s no…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, while others debate whether even minor requests like installing 2FA apps constitute an overreach &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708244&quot; title=&quot;Where do you draw the line? If the employer wants you to install a 2FA app on your phone, do you demand a separate phone or alternate 2FA device for that and mark yourself as a troublemaker? Or do you just do what 99.8% of the staff does and install the app?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/librepods-org/librepods&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Librepods: AirPods liberated&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48710232&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;338 points · 111 comments · by rbanffy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LibrePods is an open-source project that enables Apple-exclusive AirPods features, such as noise control and ear detection, on Android and Linux devices by reverse-engineering Apple&amp;#39;s proprietary communication protocol. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/librepods-org/librepods&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - librepods-org/librepods: AirPods liberated from Apple&amp;#39;s ecosystem.    URL Source: https://github.com/librepods-org/librepods    Markdown Content:  Warning    librepods.org is not an official website of the LibrePods project. It inaccurately claims to be the official website of the project by claiming copyrights and using the LibrePods logo in the footer. And at the same time, they say that the project is not affiliated with the LibrePods project or its developers.    Please report any…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While AirPods function as standard Bluetooth earbuds on non-Apple devices, Librepods aims to bring exclusive features like battery status and media control to Linux by reverse-engineering Apple&amp;#39;s proprietary protocols &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48711540&quot; title=&quot;To clarify because this is confusing: The AirPods work as regular old BlueTooth earbuds on other devices already. This is an implementation of some of the extra features and interfaces that are integrated into Apple products.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48711672&quot; title=&quot;How is it confusing? The top of the README explains it. &amp;gt; LibrePods allows you to use AirPods features that are exclusive to Apple devices. It implements the proprietary protocol used to exchange data between AirPods and Apple devices And then has a table listing the features.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion centered on the project&amp;#39;s use of AI to translate code from Kotlin to Rust &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48711419&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The aacp.rs and the att.rs files were translated from Kotlin to Rust with AI. Some parts of the media_controller.rs file, mainly the pulse integration, was also AI-generated. The future is now.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, though some users questioned the motivation for the project given their perception of AirPods&amp;#39; inferior audio and noise-canceling quality compared to cheaper alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48711304&quot; title=&quot;I’m going to be honest I fell for the AirPods Pro 3 hype about it being the best noise cancelling of all time and I bought a pair.  I found the noise cancelling worse than my $30 Anker Soundcore P30i, I could never get the hearing test on the AirPods to pass no matter what depths of a quiet room I went to, and the sound quality on music was worse than my Ankers.  Don’t fall for the hype or at least order from Amazon like I did so you can return them.  I could hear my AC running with the…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48711350&quot; title=&quot;AirPods themselves aren’t really that great from an audiophile perspective. The only part I like about them is the integration with the Apple ecosystem. This is a fun project and cudos to whoever pulled it off, but I fail to see the motivation.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant portion of the thread involved meta-commentary regarding users failing to read the README before commenting on the project&amp;#39;s purpose &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48712392&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; How is it confusing? Judging by all of the other comments that assumed otherwise, a lot of people either weren’t reading the README or weren’t parsing what it was saying.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48712867&quot; title=&quot;:sigh: There&amp;#39;s very little point having a discussion about something where other people can&amp;#39;t even be bothered to properly read the link that was submitted - and even more frustrating when that link was literally a README file.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48712387&quot; title=&quot;I wasn&amp;#39;t aware they operated as baseline Bluetooth headphones by default on other devices, so even having read the readme it wasn&amp;#39;t obvious.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://pudding.cool/2026/06/menu-story/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;5k menus from the New York Public Library’s Buttolph Collection (1880-1920)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (pudding.cool)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707763&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;350 points · 90 comments · by xbryanx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This interactive visualization explores 5,000 historical menus from the New York Public Library’s Buttolph Collection, documenting dining trends and culinary history between 1880 and 1920. &lt;a href=&quot;https://pudding.cool/2026/06/menu-story/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;pudding.cool&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;06&amp;amp;#x2F;menu-collection&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;pudding.cool&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;06&amp;amp;#x2F;menu-collection&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While many users observe that the visual layout of menus has remained remarkably consistent over 175 years &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708090&quot; title=&quot;Interesting, these really old menus would not look too out of place at a restaurant today.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708530&quot; title=&quot;As a foodie, I love this. In many respects, menus don’t seem to have drastically changed over the past 175ish years but it looks like a “Boiled” category was common early on, which I assume was because boiled foods were popular and/or easy for restaurants to make in bulk.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others highlight the disappearance of once-common staples like &amp;#34;boiled&amp;#34; categories, tongue sandwiches, and beef tea &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708530&quot; title=&quot;As a foodie, I love this. In many respects, menus don’t seem to have drastically changed over the past 175ish years but it looks like a “Boiled” category was common early on, which I assume was because boiled foods were popular and/or easy for restaurants to make in bulk.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708927&quot; title=&quot;The first menu I opened had tongue sandwiches and hot beef tea. So some things have definitely changed!&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters noted the historical prominence of clams and oysters compared to modern dining &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708307&quot; title=&quot;Interesting that many of them lead with clams or oysters.  (Perhaps this is still a thing at high-end restaurants, but to have them listed so frequently and prominently is completely foreign to me.)&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, as well as a shift toward QR codes replacing traditional physical menus in Europe &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708495&quot; title=&quot;Unfortunately in Europe printed menus almost entirely disappeared after COVID. Before, leather-clad, elegant, printed menus were commonplace, but nowadays every place just has a QR code.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also features a debate over beer mat etiquette: in some regions, marking or removing a coaster is a legal matter of forgery, while placing one over a glass can signal either the end of a meal or a temporary departure from the table &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708460&quot; title=&quot;Anyone interested in this might also like the tidbit that in Germany, they used to, and still count beer consumed as pencil strikes on the beer paper mat. Altering the number by the guest is legally considered forgery and the disappearance of the beer mat is also punishable by law. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bierdeckel#Urkundencharakter (in German, English wiki doesn&amp;#39;t have this info)&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48709100&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; In some breweries and countries, the beer mat placed on the glass signals to the waiter that the guest does not want to drink any more beer. Interesting. I’ve always seen this as a signal that a person was stepping away, but coming back. The person would cover it while going to the bathroom, in part so it isn’t as trivial for someone to slip something in their drink. Implying that they intend to keep drinking it once they return. I’d be interested to know where it means that the guest doesn’t…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thedrive.com/news/feds-killed-polestar-and-spared-volvo-that-should-terrify-you&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Feds Killed Polestar and Spared Volvo&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (thedrive.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48703613&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;173 points · 179 comments · by mraniki&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The U.S. Department of Commerce has effectively ended Polestar&amp;#39;s presence in the American market by denying it authorization under connected vehicle rules due to its Chinese ownership, while sparing its sister brand, Volvo. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thedrive.com/news/feds-killed-polestar-and-spared-volvo-that-should-terrify-you&quot; title=&quot;Feds Killed Polestar and Spared Volvo. That Should Terrify You    Polestar is done in the U.S. market. Its sister brand Volvo, owned by the same Chinese parent company, was spared. No one has explained why.    **We have updated our [Privacy Policy](https://recurrent.io/privacy-policy/). Please review to learn more. By continuing to use our services, you agree to these updates.**    ×    [ ]    [![The Drive…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether the U.S. crackdown on Polestar is driven by genuine national security concerns regarding Chinese telemetry and surveillance or if it is a protectionist move to shield domestic manufacturers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48704562&quot; title=&quot;The entire article doesn&amp;#39;t once stipulate that the grounds for banning a Chinese owned car is having telemetry that phones home to China. Maybe Volvo still does and it&amp;#39;s a mystery why they can still sell here. Maybe Volvo doesn&amp;#39;t and there is no story here. But if the car talks to China and gets updates from China, the US doesn&amp;#39;t care if it&amp;#39;s built here.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48703633&quot; title=&quot;It’s because the Polestar cars have a lot more electronic surveillance than the Volvo models, which have had only minor tweaks and have mostly not been updated for years.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48705660&quot; title=&quot;This is a remarkable opinion. If we have problems with consumer-hostile behaviour like tracking users, remotely disabling vehicles, or other things like that we should outlaw those behaviours in products used in the US. We will never do that because Western auto manufacturers want to be able to behave badly in the same way Chinese manufacturers might and they have a firm grasp on the American governments leash. &amp;#39;Its from China&amp;#39; is a dumb reason not to allow a product into the market. If there…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Commentators debate the logic of tariffs, noting that companies often bypass them by importing components separately for local assembly, a practice that blurs the line of where a car is truly &amp;#34;made&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48704102&quot; title=&quot;What makes a car ‘made in China’ (therefore over 100% tariffs) vs ‘assembled in the USA’ (therefore no tariffs)? The battery, engine and everything else is absolutely Chinese made. I don’t know how much assembly there is honestly but i feel the Geely, err i mean Polestar was a little close to that line. I will say the laws around this indicate just how ridiculous tariffs can be. There’s always some line to press up against and honestly if electric motors, batteries, car bodies and wheels from…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48704300&quot; title=&quot;Reminds me of this. There&amp;#39;s a whole industry around reverse engineering tariff classifications to find ways to minimize all-in manufacturing cost. For example, let&amp;#39;s say you sell air purifiers. Option 1 is to import an air purifier and pay the 25% tariff (or whatever the actual duty rate is) on air purifiers. Option 2 is to import a widget that gets classified as a fan (with 5% duty) and import a widget that gets classified as an air filter (with 10% duty), then put them in the same box…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the U.S. is unfairly targeting Chinese brands despite the prevalence of American companies in China, others contend that China has long maintained even stricter, more opaque barriers for Western businesses &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48704670&quot; title=&quot;If you go to China you will see plenty of KFC, Starbucks, Apple, and Tesla. American companies that all make billions out of the Chinese market. Yet the US government seems happy to play games like this; there must be someone thinking - hey the shoe could soon be on the other foot? Maybe we should cool it a bit ...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48704706&quot; title=&quot;Those are the exceptions that prove the rule. It&amp;#39;s very difficult for US or Western companies in general to do business in China without opaque restrictions, corruptions, and share ownership hoops. If the US is playing games, then it&amp;#39;s closer to kids playing soccer on weekends; China is already in the pro leagues.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48704725&quot; title=&quot;The simple story is: If you go to China you will see US brands everywhere. If you go to the US, you will see Chinese brands nowhere.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dam.stanford.edu/memory-prices.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Historical memory prices 1960-2026&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (dam.stanford.edu)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48710092&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;256 points · 91 comments · by vga1&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This interactive dataset tracks historical and projected memory prices from 1960 to 2026, providing retail cost-per-gigabyte trends for DRAM and NAND flash alongside modeled industry estimates for High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) and AI accelerator components. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dam.stanford.edu/memory-prices.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Memory Prices    URL Source: https://dam.stanford.edu/memory-prices.html    Published Time: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 18:57:16 GMT    Markdown Content:  Historic and current **memory and storage prices**, collected in the spirit of John C. McCallum&amp;#39;s classic memory-price dataset — interactive, with the raw data downloadable. Hover for details, click the legend to toggle series, drag or use the slider to zoom, and use the camera icon to export an image.    ## Price per gigabyte over time    Historical lowest…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that measuring memory prices in $/GB is misleading because it ignores inflation and the evolving hardware requirements of modern operating systems and browsers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48710714&quot; title=&quot;Says, not inflation-adjusted. With reason; adjusting those 1960-1980 prices for inflation would make the graph a lot taller. Pricing &amp;#39;per GB&amp;#39; before 1990 is unrealistic, though; nobody thought in GB or purchased GB quantities, or conceived of GB systems. I remember a moment circa 1973 when I saw an IBM CE about to do an upgrade on a 370 system at Cal Berkeley. He had a box with several carefully-packed, large circuit boards. &amp;#39;So, is that a megabyte?&amp;#39; I asked. &amp;#39;Yup, that&amp;#39;s a meg.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48712167&quot; title=&quot;A perfect example of how graphs are often misleading. $/GB is a totally useless unit value because it&amp;#39;s an arbitrary size. The unit needs to be tied to the relative usefulness for its time. The y axis should be something like $/average workstation memory or $/requirement for common compute task. It&amp;#39;s obvious that ram is expensive right now, but it&amp;#39;s not expensive per GB. It&amp;#39;s expensive relative to what you need to accomplish a useful task.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48711365&quot; title=&quot;Yes, you really need &amp;#39;dollars per amount of RAM you need for standard computing tasks.&amp;#39; Windows 11 requires a bare minimum of 4 GB of RAM, Window 10 only needed 1 GB.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48713476&quot; title=&quot;If my memory serves me correct (no pun intended), when I was a kid I remember bugging my mom to buy me like 2 or 4 1 MB modules, it was at least 50 bucks or 100 bucks each. Now everyone&amp;#39;s going to talk about how cheap everything is by comparison - but someone needs to talk about how oppressively hungry browsers and OSes are compared to in the past.  This is no HIMEM.SYS&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While raw prices per GB have stagnated or regressed to 2010-era levels, some users attribute this to the end of Moore&amp;#39;s Law, market volatility from AI and crypto, and a shift in focus toward RAM speed over capacity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48711300&quot; title=&quot;So a price per GB today is about the same as it was in 2010. 16 year regression, wow!&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48711940&quot; title=&quot;Memory prices per GB were cheaper in 2012. It’s possible we’ll see a huge price drop on the near term but SSD + Cache + GPU’s seems to have changed the equation where RAM speed is considered more important than size.  And from a pure architecture standpoint it makes sense.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48711423&quot; title=&quot;One could also blame crypto and AI (they&amp;#39;re clearly responsible for some of the volatility in the graph), but I can see the curve flatten in the 2010s, just as Moore&amp;#39;s law ended.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48710872&quot; title=&quot;turns out things are not that bad! we just rolled back to 2010. oh, wait, now every app is a browser instance. shit. EDIT: so, how did I arrive at 2010, you ask? I looked at DDR5 pricing and found the closest pricing per GB in the past. this turned out to be DDR3 memory. I think it&amp;#39;s totally fair since it was the latest and greatest thing back then, much like DDR5 is now. although, if we compare DDR3 to DDR3, we still roll back pretty far - a very close to current price was spotted in 2018,…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite current high costs, there is speculation that massive production scaling for AI could eventually lead to a significant price drop for consumers in the next five years &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48711831&quot; title=&quot;Look at it this way: while the upfront cost to scale up production is huge, prices are now high enough to justify it even if demand is expected to drop abruptly later on. So if you can wait 5 years for your next PC, 1TB RAM might go for what 64GB would have cost without the AI demand spike. Granted, if you need a new system before then, you&amp;#39;re SOL. One thing to look out for is supply capacity curiously going offline in 2030 or whatever. That would hint at market power or collusion.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/2847&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A way to exclude sensitive files issue still open for OpenAI Codex&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48706714&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;192 points · 126 comments · by pikseladam&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Developers are requesting a mechanism for OpenAI Codex to explicitly exclude sensitive files and paths from being read or sent to the model, suggesting a standardized ignore file to prevent the accidental exposure of secrets and credentials. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/2847&quot; title=&quot;Title: A way to exclude sensitive files    URL Source: https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/2847    Published Time: 2025-08-28T18:48:23.000Z    Markdown Content:  [Skip to content](https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/2847#start-of-content)  ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [](https://github.com/)    [Sign in](https://github.com/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fopenai%2Fcodex%2Fissues%2F2847)    Appearance settings    *     Platform        *     AI CODE CREATION          *   [GitHub Copilot…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary consensus among technical users is that excluding sensitive files from OpenAI Codex should be handled at the OS or infrastructure level—via file permissions, containers, or dedicated VMs—rather than within the model itself &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48706893&quot; title=&quot;You can do this now: change the file permissions such that the user you run codex as can&amp;#39;t read them, or run codex in a container without those files mounted. If you don&amp;#39;t do that, the agent will be able to incidentally upload them. What if the model runs &amp;#39;rg foo&amp;#39;, and one of those files contains the string &amp;#39;foo&amp;#39;? It uploads the tool output, which includes the file contents. And so, the only solution is to make it so the codex process is unable to access those files, hence using a container, or…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707064&quot; title=&quot;100% this. The idea that Codex should enforce this is putting the security boundary at the wrong layer. If you don’t want codes to access something, make it so it doesn’t have access.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707195&quot; title=&quot;The only thing close to a guarantee is to give the agent exclusive access to a clean VM with precisely the information and permissions you want it to have. I&amp;#39;ve been looking into a &amp;#39;workspace&amp;#39; concept that involves an entire cloud VM being spun up as part of an agent conversation such that code changes can be iterated without touching the user&amp;#39;s local machine or other trusted contexts. All the agent&amp;#39;s tools only have effect when supplied with a specific workspace guid. CLI tools like git are…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters argue that because agents can use arbitrary tools like `grep` or `make`, a simple exclusion list is insufficient to prevent accidental data leaks or intentional exploration &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48706893&quot; title=&quot;You can do this now: change the file permissions such that the user you run codex as can&amp;#39;t read them, or run codex in a container without those files mounted. If you don&amp;#39;t do that, the agent will be able to incidentally upload them. What if the model runs &amp;#39;rg foo&amp;#39;, and one of those files contains the string &amp;#39;foo&amp;#39;? It uploads the tool output, which includes the file contents. And so, the only solution is to make it so the codex process is unable to access those files, hence using a container, or…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707019&quot; title=&quot;Just be aware that AI agents will explore alternate means of accessing said files: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48348578&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707596&quot; title=&quot;The difference is that git is a traditional programming tool which executes deterministically. agents are not deterministic tools, they&amp;#39;re not sandboxes or container runtimes or languages with capabilities models. They&amp;#39;re a way to run arbitrary commands. It would be like saying that &amp;#39;xterm&amp;#39; should have a &amp;#39;.xtermnoexec&amp;#39; list of commands you can&amp;#39;t run, or that VLC should have an option for actors it won&amp;#39;t show. terminals run shells which run commands, it&amp;#39;s not really deeply aware of what commands…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. This debate highlights a perceived knowledge gap, where some users expect AI tools to manage security boundaries that traditionally belong to the operating system or engineering best practices like git &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707524&quot; title=&quot;The Codex bug tracker is a great insight into how wide the knowledge gap seem to be between users. The issue where people ask them to add back /undo or whatever it is instead of just learning to use git, probably reached 100 comments at least by now. People seemingly don&amp;#39;t really understand the computers they use on a daily basis, and refuse to learn too.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707374&quot; title=&quot;Not sure I agree? It’s not like gitignore should be independent from git&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708455&quot; title=&quot;We managed to generate probably-correct code, which can then be probably-corrected recursively to get to something that runs (usually). This made everyone scream and lose their minds saying that code is finished, people think they don&amp;#39;t need a technical cofounder anymore, think they don&amp;#39;t need engineers anymore, etc. Then they&amp;#39;re, at varying speeds, finding out they&amp;#39;re wrong. It seems oddly circular to me that the _exact hubris_ non-engineers have long accused engineers of - and we have indeed…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://zanagrams.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Zanagrams&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (zanagrams.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708182&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;243 points · 57 comments · by pompomsheep&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Zanagrams is a free daily word puzzle where players drag across a shrinking grid of letters to identify and clear hidden words. &lt;a href=&quot;https://zanagrams.com/&quot; title=&quot;Zanagrams - free daily word puzzle    A free daily word puzzle. Drag across the letters to find the hidden words and watch the grid shrink as you solve it.    # Zanagrams #1    00:00    ‹    ##    ×    ##    ×    ##    ×    ›  ›  ›  ››  ›    ‹    ##    ×    ‹    ##    ×    ‹    ##    ×    ##    ‹    ##    ×    ‹    ##    ×&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users generally enjoyed the game&amp;#39;s mechanics, noting that the difficulty decreases as the puzzle is solved &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708411&quot; title=&quot;Fun! I like how the puzzle naturally gets easier as you solve it. How do you decide which words to include?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, though some found the lack of an &amp;#34;undo&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;hint&amp;#34; feature frustrating when they became stuck &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48710712&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m stuck.  Does that mean I chose the wrong word earlier and used up an essential letter? Does the sequence of word guesses matter? Is there an Undo feature so I can back up and try a different order of guesses? Can I get a hint?  Is there a way to give up and see the solution (order of word guesses)?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a debate regarding the &amp;#34;bonus word&amp;#34; system: while some appreciate the recognition of unplanned words &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708759&quot; title=&quot;I like that it also handles words that aren&amp;#39;t planned in. You get a nice &amp;#39;bonus word&amp;#39; popout.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that all valid words should count toward the solution and that plurals can feel like &amp;#34;cheap&amp;#34; additions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48710663&quot; title=&quot;Nice game! I found 20 words. I was a bit stunned by the concept of &amp;#39;bonus words&amp;#39;. I found that every word should count. Also because some words are just plural forms (e.g. stroke+s), so kinda cheep?! Keep ups the good work!&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Suggestions for improvement include clarifying the four-letter minimum rule &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48711624&quot; title=&quot;The rules should probably explicitly mention the minimum length of four letters. (It&amp;#39;s a reasonable rule; it just wasn&amp;#39;t obvious from reading the info in &amp;#39;how to play&amp;#39;)&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, adding a scoreboard to track attempts rather than just time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48709275&quot; title=&quot;the score should include how many bonus words you found (out of how many there were in total) and instead of time it should count how many tries you made because technically you could brute force this and try all combinations. counting each try would eliminate that (for anyone trying to get a high score)&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48711136&quot; title=&quot;You should add a scoreboard! I got zanagram #5 in 3 minutes and 53 seconds. Also found two bonus words I thought I was slow but now I see others took 10 minutes and 20 minutes! Maybe I&amp;#39;m not so slow! Zanagrams #5   Complete in 03:53 https://zanagrams.com/&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, and refining the word list to better distinguish between common and esoteric vocabulary &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48711874&quot; title=&quot;I also must have a weird vocabulary. &amp;#39;Fete&amp;#39; was treated as an uncommon bonus word, which doesn&amp;#39;t seem particularly esoteric to me, but &amp;#39;tarragon&amp;#39; was one of the ones I needed to finish a certain puzzle, and I had never heard of that before.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://aresluna.org/the-curious-case-of-the-disappearing-polish-s/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The curious case of the disappearing Polish S (2015)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (aresluna.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48706814&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;226 points · 74 comments · by colinprince&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The provided text is insufficient to summarize the linked story as it contains only a single nonsensical sentence and a broken image link. &lt;a href=&quot;https://aresluna.org/the-curious-case-of-the-disappearing-polish-s/&quot; title=&quot;Title: https://aresluna.org/images/the-curious-case-of-the-disappearing-polish-s/graphics/alphabet-english.svg    URL Source: https://aresluna.org/the-curious-case-of-the-disappearing-polish-s/    Published Time: Sat, 27 Jun 2026 17:00:06 GMT    Warning: This is a cached snapshot of the original page, consider retry with caching opt-out.    Markdown Content:  Two short ago I drank more tony hawk than vodka&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The use of the Latin alphabet in Polish is seen as a key factor in aligning the nation culturally with the West, sparking a debate on whether Ukraine or other nations should follow Kazakhstan&amp;#39;s example and ditch Cyrillic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707336&quot; title=&quot;I believe the fact that Polish uses the Latin alphabet (with a small Slavic twist to express the extra sounds) meant it was much easier for Poland to align itself westward. I think the average Pole is much closer culturally to the Western neighbours than to a Ukrainian or Russian (maybe apart from cuisine).&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48709478&quot; title=&quot;Like Kazakhstan, which decided to switch from Cyrillic to the Latin alphabet [1] in order to align more with Europe and less with Russia. I wonder if Ukraine will do the same in a distant future... [1] https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20180424-the-cost-of-ch...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48709896&quot; title=&quot;Ukraine absolutely must ditch Cyrillic alphabet, after the war. There will be plenty of things to change.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue Polish culture and cuisine are closely tied to Germany, others suggest a shared &amp;#34;North-Eastern European&amp;#34; identity defined by common staples like potatoes and rye &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707434&quot; title=&quot;Polish cuisine is very similar to German cuisine. (This comment will make a lot of Polish people very upset.)&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708301&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s also true for Belarus, Baltics, and some parts of Ukraine. Generally, we can speak about North-Eastern European cuisine with potatoes, secale flour breads, and various pickled things. And that name will make a lot of everybody upset, cause everybody in those lands pretend they are &amp;#39;Central&amp;#39;. Americans would not believe how many &amp;#39;geographical centers of Europe&amp;#39; are claimed there.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical frustrations also persist, as modern software shortcuts and keyboard layouts frequently interfere with typing specific Polish characters like &amp;#34;Ć&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707806&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s just like the new Copilot 365. Every time I try to type &amp;#39;Ć&amp;#39;, Copilot pops up. I have to close the app constantly.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48709611&quot; title=&quot;Lol For a good while the default US Intl keyboard in some Linux versions would give a ć instead of a ç for the combination c + &amp;#39; Makes sense right? Except that made a lot of people angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move Because Brazilian users were expecting c + &amp;#39; to become ç (And they had to use Alt Gr + c instead)&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/kyuz0/amd-strix-halo-vllm-toolboxes/blob/main/rdma_cluster/setup_guide.md&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AMD Strix Halo RDMA Cluster Setup Guide&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48703258&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;224 points · 75 comments · by jakogut&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This guide explains how to configure a two-node **AMD Strix Halo** cluster using **Intel E810** cards and **RoCE v2** for distributed vLLM inference. It details hardware requirements, Fedora host setup, and a custom-patched toolbox that enables RDMA support for the `gfx1151` architecture. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/kyuz0/amd-strix-halo-vllm-toolboxes/blob/main/rdma_cluster/setup_guide.md&quot; title=&quot;Title: amd-strix-halo-vllm-toolboxes/rdma_cluster/setup_guide.md at main · kyuz0/amd-strix-halo-vllm-toolboxes    URL Source: https://github.com/kyuz0/amd-strix-halo-vllm-toolboxes/blob/main/rdma_cluster/setup_guide.md    Markdown Content:  ## AMD Strix Halo RDMA Cluster Setup Guide    [](https://github.com/kyuz0/amd-strix-halo-vllm-toolboxes/blob/main/rdma_cluster/setup_guide.md#amd-strix-halo-rdma-cluster-setup-guide)  This guide details how to configure a two-node **AMD Strix Halo** cluster linked…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are experimenting with AMD Strix Halo clusters for local AI, noting that while performance for models like DeepSeek V4 Flash is usable, it currently lags significantly behind Apple’s M-series chips in both memory bandwidth and generation speed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48703792&quot; title=&quot;I have two 128gb Strix Halos and have been extremely excited about Antirez&amp;#39;s (Redis author) work on DS4, especially with 4bit quant using two machines: https://github.com/antirez/ds4 Right now the speed isn&amp;#39;t good for GLM 5.2, Deepseek V4 Flash speed is okay for me (actually reading the output) and quite usable. See kyuz0&amp;#39;s great recent video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkKXm_mKCCM With a bit more speed and model improvements, local AI becomes a reasonable practical thing! The biggest…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48704326&quot; title=&quot;So this is kind of fascinating. The main hardware costs here seem to be: - 2x Framework Desktop AI Mainboards with 128GB of RAM for $3150 each - 2x 100G Ethernet controllers for ~$500 each So the Framework board has a single PCI-e 4.0 x4 slot, which amounts to 8GB/s or 64Gbps theoretical so you&amp;#39;re not getting 100G. Also, the 100G cards all seem to be PCI-e x16 slots for obvious reasons so you need a riser or an adapter or something to even get them to work. I don&amp;#39;t know how hot a 100GbE copper…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48704972&quot; title=&quot;Benchmarks are here: https://kyuz0.github.io/amd-strix-halo-vllm-toolboxes/ Would love to see DeepSeek V4 flash/pro and MiniMax M3 benchmarks but already these are pretty impressive, first strix Halo setup I&amp;#39;ve seen with some serious performance. EDIT: Apologies - I think I misunderstood these benchmarks - it seems this is actually very slow when compared to a M4 or M5 chip with a good amount of memory. Looking at the creators video here: https://youtu.be/Cfl3TS7ME5s?t=734 -- it seems the…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong consensus that hardware prices have skyrocketed recently, with 128GB machines jumping from ~€2,000 to over €7,000, leading some to argue that used enterprise GPUs now offer better value for the money &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48703792&quot; title=&quot;I have two 128gb Strix Halos and have been extremely excited about Antirez&amp;#39;s (Redis author) work on DS4, especially with 4bit quant using two machines: https://github.com/antirez/ds4 Right now the speed isn&amp;#39;t good for GLM 5.2, Deepseek V4 Flash speed is okay for me (actually reading the output) and quite usable. See kyuz0&amp;#39;s great recent video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkKXm_mKCCM With a bit more speed and model improvements, local AI becomes a reasonable practical thing! The biggest…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48705313&quot; title=&quot;I had a Strix Halo laptop with 128GB which unfortunately died last week. I paid 2800 euro for it. If I buy the same machine today, the sticker price is 7899. The device was not perfect by any means, but the ability to run fairly large models is some kind of magic.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48705580&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;sticker price is 7899. It&amp;#39;s not even worth it at that point. You can get a used enterprise grade SXM baseboard with 4-8 V100/A100 GPUs off eBay at a similar price. That will even get you actual HMB ram and NVlink. Along with 10x the AI performance, assuming you don&amp;#39;t care about your electricity bill of course.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48704998&quot; title=&quot;Last year you could buy a AI Max 395+ with 128G for 2.5k, now it&amp;#39;s almost $4k. Or maybe you&amp;#39;re right, I originally remembered 2k as well. I wanted to wait for the AI Max 395+ upgrade of my laptop, and now it makes no sense to upgrade.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate the practicality of using laptops for high-performance computing due to thermal constraints, others highlight technical hurdles in clustering, such as PCIe lane limitations and the high cost of 100GbE networking &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48704326&quot; title=&quot;So this is kind of fascinating. The main hardware costs here seem to be: - 2x Framework Desktop AI Mainboards with 128GB of RAM for $3150 each - 2x 100G Ethernet controllers for ~$500 each So the Framework board has a single PCI-e 4.0 x4 slot, which amounts to 8GB/s or 64Gbps theoretical so you&amp;#39;re not getting 100G. Also, the 100G cards all seem to be PCI-e x16 slots for obvious reasons so you need a riser or an adapter or something to even get them to work. I don&amp;#39;t know how hot a 100GbE copper…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48705050&quot; title=&quot;I think people buying laptops for AI use are, sorry, just plain crazy. You overpay for the screen and keyboard and battery and whatever, plus you get much worse thermal performance because of basic physics (area vs volume). My Framework Desktop has a Noctua cooler which works really well. [Tangent: all my life I&amp;#39;ve been downvoted into a smoking hole in the ground, particularly on reddit r/hardware, for questioning the wisdom of laptops for high performance computing, including gaming. Everyone…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://decomp-academy.dev&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Decomp Academy – Learn to decompile GameCube games into matching C&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (decomp-academy.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48703412&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;190 points · 71 comments · by jackpriceburns&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Decomp Academy is a new, free interactive platform that teaches users how to reverse-engineer GameCube games by decompiling PowerPC assembly into matching C code using a live compiler. &lt;a href=&quot;https://decomp-academy.dev&quot; title=&quot;Over the past few months I&amp;amp;#x27;ve been heavily involved in the decompilation community. I&amp;amp;#x27;ve been hands-on decompiling a beloved game from my childhood (Star Fox Adventures). I started this journey with zero prior decomp experience—and to make things worse I had never really touched C nor assembly either.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Learning how to decompile was challenging. It&amp;amp;#x27;s difficult to find any good learning resources for it and any open-source projects for this are inactive and&amp;amp;#x2F;or contain little…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Decomp Academy introduces a platform for learning to reverse-engineer GameCube games into matching C code, sparking a debate on the role of AI in this field. While some users report success using LLMs to port legacy software &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48703647&quot; title=&quot;Damn this is next level. Congratulations on your achievements! When Fable was around I thought i&amp;#39;d test it by taking an old piece of Windows software from the late 90s/2000s(ModPlug Player) and seeing how well it could convert it to being a native Mac application. I was blown away at how it got 85% of the way there in one prompt. Things such as writing a PE extractor, recovering the complete skin, menu tree, full accelerator table, all dialogs, and then it delved into the registry value names…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others note that AI often fails at the &amp;#34;tail end&amp;#34; of matching decompilation where exact assembly parity is required &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48703684&quot; title=&quot;AI is being used in many retro game decomp projects! One of the reasons I went down the path of learning decomp myself was because AI had hit a wall. Matching decomp is quite a bit harder than just normal decomp as even simple things like using an if/else instead of a terney actually change the assembly. AI did an amazing job of getting to 95% matches on nearly all functions, but once it got to that tail end, it started to struggle quite a lot and would often just claim &amp;#39;it&amp;#39;s impossible&amp;#39;. So…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant concerns exist regarding the legal risks of AI-generated code, with some arguing it lacks the &amp;#34;creative transformation&amp;#34; by humans that traditionally protects decompilation projects from copyright claims &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48704061&quot; title=&quot;I say this every time it comes up, but polluting a decomp project with AI generated code is risky, imho. What makes decomp legal (in the US) is that it’s a creative transformation performed by a human and the resulting copyright of the code that just happens to compile to the same binary is owned by the person doing the decompiling. USPTO and court precedent is leaning heavily toward LLM output not being transformative on its own, making it mechanical, and no longer fair use and in violation of…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48704455&quot; title=&quot;Does it being a creative transformation rob the derivative work status? Personally, I&amp;#39;d liken the process of decompilation to that of translating a book from one language to another - the copyright on the original work does not become void merely because the process of translation requires extensive creativity. Nicalis and Take-Two have both gone after decompilation projects, also. In particular, Nicalis has gone after a decompilation of Cave Story, but not a black box reimplementation of the…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/28/google-limits-metas-use-of-its-gemini-ai-models-ft-reports.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Google limits Meta&amp;#39;s use of its Gemini AI models&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cnbc.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707103&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;150 points · 70 comments · by root-parent&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google has reportedly limited Meta&amp;#39;s access to its Gemini AI models because the social media giant requested more computing capacity than Google could provide, causing delays to Meta&amp;#39;s internal AI projects. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/28/google-limits-metas-use-of-its-gemini-ai-models-ft-reports.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Google limits Meta’s use of its Gemini AI models, FT reports    URL Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/28/google-limits-metas-use-of-its-gemini-ai-models-ft-reports.html    Published Time: 2026-06-28T10:30:27+0000    Markdown Content:  [Skip Navigation](https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/28/google-limits-metas-use-of-its-gemini-ai-models-ft-reports.html#MainContent)    [![Image 2: CNBC logo](https://static-redesign.cnbcfm.com/dist/d6085c9e81f4d7365c8d.svg)](https://www.cnbc.com/)    Google limits…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue the headline is misleading, clarifying that the restrictions on Meta are likely due to physical capacity constraints rather than strategic gatekeeping &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707420&quot; title=&quot;This seems to be a bit of a misleading headline. In the current climate limiting someone&amp;#39;s use of AI might be expected to be about restricting access or restricting what someone can do with it, but the story here ostensibly seems to be about capacity constraints, not any limitation on what models or capabilities Google is giving Meta access to.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707586&quot; title=&quot;These kind of limits happen all the time for big clients. Cloud services like to present the illusion of an infinite amount of compute available at a fixed price per unit, but the reality is if you try to use too much of any service you&amp;#39;ll find you have a quota and requests to increase it will fall on deaf ears if the provider doesn&amp;#39;t have more of that resource. Too much of my working life has been spent shoehorning services into less space/compute/ram/spindles or migrations to other data…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While cloud providers market &amp;#34;infinite&amp;#34; compute, users frequently encounter rigid quotas that require manual approval to increase, leading some to question the value of cloud services over cheaper bare-metal alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707586&quot; title=&quot;These kind of limits happen all the time for big clients. Cloud services like to present the illusion of an infinite amount of compute available at a fixed price per unit, but the reality is if you try to use too much of any service you&amp;#39;ll find you have a quota and requests to increase it will fall on deaf ears if the provider doesn&amp;#39;t have more of that resource. Too much of my working life has been spent shoehorning services into less space/compute/ram/spindles or migrations to other data…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708201&quot; title=&quot;Yeah but you don&amp;#39;t need cloud for a blog. Cloud was sold as effectively infinite resources - capacity isn&amp;#39;t infinite, or effectively infinite, it&amp;#39;s 20% more than you are currently using and you pay 300% more for that. There has to be a name for this deceptive marketing tactic where you say something is unlimited and then it is only unlimited as long as you don&amp;#39;t use very much. It would be one thing if you occasionally got a &amp;#39;no more capacity&amp;#39; error when requesting large amounts of resources but…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708761&quot; title=&quot;if im going to have to ask for capacity, why dont I just get my own bare metal servers then?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48709139&quot; title=&quot;You can order bare metal servers delivery time in minutes from any number of hosting providers and the cost difference is so huge you can afford to keep excess capacity and still come out ahead.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also curiosity regarding why Meta is prioritizing Gemini over other models and how much of Google&amp;#39;s capacity is consumed by its own AI search summaries versus external clients &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707461&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s interesting that Meta is heavily using Google&amp;#39;s models (as opposed to Anthropic or OpenAI) given that they are not SOTA for coding. I wonder if this for some strategic/competitive reason, or maybe for cost saving?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708486&quot; title=&quot;Google makes claims here about high demand for Gemini - does anyone here have insight into how much of the load on Google is paid use vs the load from putting AI summaries into every web search?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/open-energy-transition/open-tyndp&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;EU Open Sources Ten-Year Network Development Planning Tools&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707361&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;158 points · 39 comments · by lyoncy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Open Energy Transition and ENTSO-E have launched Open-TYNDP, an open-source workflow based on PyPSA-Eur designed to enhance transparency in European energy planning. The project aims to integrate open-source frameworks into the Ten-Year Network Development Plan for improved scenario building and cost-benefit analysis. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/open-energy-transition/open-tyndp&quot; title=&quot;GitHub - open-energy-transition/open-tyndp: Open-TYNDP: Interfacing Open Energy System Planning with ENTSO-E Models and Contributing to TYNDP    Open-TYNDP: Interfacing Open Energy System Planning with ENTSO-E Models and Contributing to TYNDP - open-energy-transition/open-tyndp    [Skip to content](#start-of-content)    ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [Sign in](/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fopen-energy-transition%2Fopen-tyndp)    Appearance settings    * Platform      + AI CODE…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The EU&amp;#39;s decision to open-source its power infrastructure modeling tools aims to replace expensive, proprietary software with a transparent, reproducible alternative based on PyPSA-Eur &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707805&quot; title=&quot;The EU is demanding that the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO-E) implement this ten-year power infrastructure plan transparently. Unfortunately, this modelling has so far been carried out using an expensive, proprietary tool (PLEXOS Energy Exemplar). The results were not easily reproducible. However, with the new model based on PyPSA-Eur, a transparent Ten-Year Network Development Plan can be created.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users question the utility of open-sourcing such niche bureaucratic tools, others argue that transparency in public infrastructure planning should be commended &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707707&quot; title=&quot;Educate me, what’s the point of (open-sourcing) this?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707767&quot; title=&quot;People who are interested can look at it and use it. People who aren&amp;#39;t interested are free to ignore it. What&amp;#39;s the downside of open-sourcing this? We should commend bureaucracies on the rare instance that they open-source their software, not ridicule them for it.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant portion of the debate focuses on the EU&amp;#39;s choice to host the code on GitHub, a US-owned platform, sparking disagreements over whether the convenience of GitHub&amp;#39;s social network effects outweighs the need for European digital sovereignty &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707642&quot; title=&quot;And where did they put it? On the biggest US platform. Someday we&amp;#39;ll get there, someday.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708386&quot; title=&quot;The reason people cite when defending Github usually isn&amp;#39;t the repisitory hosting itself, but the extra features like oull request management and issue tracker that also generate massive network effects by enabling the same accounts to participate in all public projects. Github is nore of a social network posing as a development tool.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48708023&quot; title=&quot;He just told you; US platform.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-06-27</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-06-27</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/bikini/exploitarium&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Anonymous GitHub account mass-dropping undisclosed 0-days&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698617&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;928 points · 374 comments · by binyu&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An anonymous researcher has published a GitHub repository containing numerous undisclosed zero-day exploits and proof-of-concept code for major software including FFmpeg, libssh2, and Docker. The author used AI-automated fuzzing to identify the vulnerabilities and released them publicly to encourage interest in cybersecurity research. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/bikini/exploitarium&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - bikini/exploitarium: A single archive of public exploit PoCs and vulnerability research writeups. At the time I post these, none have been reported. Feel free to report them yourself and take credit for the CVE if handed out lulz. Please do not abuse these. I do this so to allure people into the field, and I&amp;#39;ve always found this is the most efficient way.    URL Source: https://github.com/bikini/exploitarium    Markdown Content:  ##…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the legitimacy of a mass-drop of alleged 0-days, with skeptics arguing the term is being diluted to describe non-vulnerabilities or previously disclosed exploits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699267&quot; title=&quot;Are they all actually 0-day? I think a lot of them are from disclosed CVEs/code that were already fixed upstream. It often seems like the term &amp;#39;0-day&amp;#39; has lost most of its meaning today and people often use it to refer to any exploits.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699392&quot; title=&quot;Repo claims &amp;gt; A single archive of public exploit PoCs and vulnerability research writeups. At the time I post these, none have been reported. Feel free to report them yourself and take credit for the CVE if handed out lulz. Please do not abuse these. I do this so to allure people into the field, and I&amp;#39;ve always found this is the most efficient way. Which is roughly the definition of zero day. Whether the contents of the repo reflect the above claim is something else entirely.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699400&quot; title=&quot;I took a look at the Ghidra ones (because I use Ghidra), and I&amp;#39;m unimpressed: https://github.com/bikini/exploitarium/blob/main/ghidra-12.1... The first requires being able to overwrite binaries in the Swift tool directory. Yes, if you overwrite binaries executed by ghidra, you can trigger code execution. This is not a surprise. The second, idk, I&amp;#39;m not familiar with TraceRMI (but it&amp;#39;s probably worth noting that &amp;#39;RMI&amp;#39; stands for Remote Method Invocation). The third is not a vulnerability in the…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users suggest that the rise of automated bot-driven discovery may necessitate a return to &amp;#34;security through obscurity&amp;#34; for open-source projects &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699214&quot; title=&quot;Most of the exploits are for opensource/free software. I don&amp;#39;t know what methods where used to find these exploits but I am starting to think security through obscurity might not be a bad thing in this day and age, where someone can just let bots loose on your codebase.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, a significant portion of the thread debates how the use of em-dashes has become a stylistic &amp;#34;AI trigger,&amp;#34; leading some writers to alter their punctuation habits to avoid being mistaken for an LLM &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699673&quot; title=&quot;0-days-vibes-vulns ? There should be a new category, for spotting and handling the em-dashes of this brave new world of vulns and making the old fossils like me only picking my head up for the old painfully still hand-crafted artisanal ones instead. A kind of label, like free-range for eggs, in sum.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699781&quot; title=&quot;Yes, big pet peeve of the new world. Every em dash is apparently an AI trigger. Back in my day, they were a sign of great respect within my people.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699994&quot; title=&quot;I used to be an em-dash user, but now my opinion is that I’d rather be perceived as someone who does not want to be confused with an LLM. So I’ve changed my writing style.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700160&quot; title=&quot;They&amp;#39;re just so handy! I do think LLMs tend to use them in a specific way, though. So maybe tweaking your usage (ex. no spaces around them) or using a technically incorrect en-dash might offer the desired effect while subtly signaling that your message isn&amp;#39;t AI-generated. I still use them — mostly for pauses — but I&amp;#39;d like to think my voice sounds distinct enough from an AI that people can tell.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSpec/blob/main/DSpark_paper.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;DSpark: Speculative decoding accelerates LLM inference [pdf]&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696585&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;787 points · 353 comments · by aurenvale&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DeepSeek has released a paper detailing DSpark, a speculative decoding method designed to accelerate Large Language Model (LLM) inference. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSpec/blob/main/DSpark_paper.pdf&quot; title=&quot;Title: DeepSpec/DSpark_paper.pdf at main · deepseek-ai/DeepSpec    URL Source: https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSpec/blob/main/DSpark_paper.pdf    Markdown Content:  *         *     AI CODE CREATION            *   [GitHub Copilot Write better code with AI](https://github.com/features/copilot)          *   [GitHub Copilot app Direct agents from issue to merge](https://github.com/features/ai/github-app)          *   [MCP Registry New Integrate external tools](https://github.com/mcp)        *     DEVELOPER…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters highlight that DeepSeek is currently leading in innovation and transparency by publishing technical optimizations that American labs now keep private &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696940&quot; title=&quot;DeepSeek continues to not only push the boundaries but also publish these incredible papers explaining how they achieved their gains - something the American labs no longer do unfortunately. Chinese labs are doing the most interesting work in AI right now.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697761&quot; title=&quot;DeepSeek is, as I feel currently, the sole AI company which is actually trying to innovate rather than top mere benchmarks. Others like OpenAI, Anthropic and Google are mostly just competeing with each rather than keep innovating around the clock.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. This shift is attributed to differing incentives: US companies must protect &amp;#34;moats&amp;#34; to justify massive valuations, while Chinese labs may be open-sourcing to level the playing field while they are still catching up &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696975&quot; title=&quot;Probably because American AI companies are on the hook for quite a lot of investment money. I think they are trying to find the magical moat to justify their valuation. Revealing optimizations similar to these would pretty much reduce their competitive position.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697007&quot; title=&quot;Chinese labs are also still behind, so they’re incentivized to collaborate and have no reason to do it in private. I suspect their tune will change if they ever take the lead..&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696957&quot; title=&quot;Publishing by necessity I wonder? American labs on the cutting edge pioneering the way forward, so Deepseek open sourcing what they’ve got is to help even the playing field. Hopefully the experts here can offer insight. The above is just my hunch and I’m not a specialist in this field.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Regardless of whether these contributions are altruistic or self-serving, users note that these efficiencies likely explain DeepSeek&amp;#39;s significantly lower pricing compared to competitors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697053&quot; title=&quot;Which is a good thing. Self-serving motives are more reliable than altruistic ones.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697359&quot; title=&quot;Open-source is also altruistic. If DeepSeek does become self-serving once they get the top spot, it doesn’t take away from the altruistic contributions that they made towards open models.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697050&quot; title=&quot;I am wondering if this is why they can offer their pro model at ~1/4th of the price compared to the other providers offering the same model, and if other providers will be able to do the same in a short timeframe.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://pluralistic.net/2026/06/27/zuckerstreisand-2/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Zuckerberg&amp;#39;s war on whistleblowers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (pluralistic.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698684&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;757 points · 286 comments · by HotGarbage&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams is suing Meta to invalidate a restrictive contract after the company sought millions in damages and attempted to legally bar her from appearing in public, even in total silence, following the publication of her memoir detailing corporate misconduct. &lt;a href=&quot;https://pluralistic.net/2026/06/27/zuckerstreisand-2/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Daily links from Cory Doctorow    URL Source: https://pluralistic.net/2026/06/27/zuckerstreisand-2/    Markdown Content:  [![Image 1](https://i0.wp.com/craphound.com/images/27Jun2026.jpg?w=840&amp;amp;ssl=1)](https://pluralistic.net/2026/06/27/zuckerstreisand/)    ## Today&amp;#39;s links    *   [Zuckerberg&amp;#39;s increasingly bizarre war on whistleblowers](https://pluralistic.net/2026/06/27/zuckerstreisand/#autodisparagement): Under no circumstances should you rush out and read the book that prompted Mark Zuckerberg…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters debate whether Meta’s aggressive stance toward whistleblowers stems from a calculated fear of more damaging secrets being revealed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699568&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not increasingly bizarre, really, if you just allow for the possibility of one thing: There&amp;#39;s something else worse that they know could be in such a book, but isn&amp;#39;t yet, and it is so bad that it is worth doing this. Perhaps they know that Wynn-Williams could have put it in the book and didn&amp;#39;t. Perhaps they know that someone else — someone else British, say? — could write such things in a book and so far hasn&amp;#39;t. Once you assume their motivation is grounded in real fear, it gets easier to…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; or simply from Mark Zuckerberg’s personal pettiness and ego &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699412&quot; title=&quot;My guess would be - there is way more primitive explanation than setting an example etc (which is also a good reason, from their point of view). It is just plain ego and pettiness - we see it everywhere, even from a manager who has 3 people reporting to him. Why else would Zuck cheat on a board game , of all things? That too in private? It might just be as primitive as &amp;#39;I have more money than God, therefore I am better than everyone else, nobody dare to challenge/disrespect me even in the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Some suggest his behavior, including reported cheating at board games, is a &amp;#34;social power move&amp;#34; designed to test the intimidation factor and loyalty of those around him &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699698&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It is just plain ago and pettiness […] Why else would Zuck cheat on a board game Recently I felt somewhat enlightened on this point, specifically in regards to Trump cheating at golf and some of his bald-faced lies, but I’d speculate it applies here too. Others pointed out to me that while it might look petty and ridiculous to normal people, it’s a social power move to get away with things, and serves the purpose of testing what can be gotten away with, and practicing or exercising the push…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also speculation that the company&amp;#39;s actions may be aimed at silencing specific high-profile figures, such as former British politician Nick Clegg &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699991&quot; title=&quot;I’d hazard a guess they might be referring to an ex-British politician who went on to have a high profile role in comms at meta.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700087&quot; title=&quot;Why is everyone beating around the bush? Its Nick Clegg&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.openra.net/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OpenRA&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (openra.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697560&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;783 points · 154 comments · by tosh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenRA has launched a new playtest featuring random map generators for classic titles, a visual and balance overhaul for Dune 2000, and significant progress toward integrating remastered assets into the Tiberian Dawn HD mod. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.openra.net/&quot; title=&quot;Title: OpenRA    URL Source: https://www.openra.net/    Markdown Content:  The past year has brought several exciting new developments, which we are happy to share today with a new [OpenRA playtest](https://www.openra.net/download)!    The headline new feature in playtest-20260222 are the new random map generators for Red Alert, Tiberian Dawn, and Dune 2000. These work much like you would expect: select a biome, the number of players, and some details about symmetry and resources, then play! Generated…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenRA is praised for modernizing the balance of original *Command &amp;amp; Conquer* titles, such as allowing Allied artillery to outrange Soviet Tesla coils &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697961&quot; title=&quot;If you play the original and then OpenRA you will be amazed how well OpenRA is balanced. As an example, while in the original game using allied artillery against soviet tesla coils was a dead sentence in OpenRA is great to be able to fire well beyond its range forcing you to come out of the base to defend it. They also added a ton of features which make the game truly enjoyable and fun to play. Well done OpenRA team!&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. However, users disagree on the quality of the AI, with some finding it frustratingly difficult or prone to &amp;#34;cheating&amp;#34; through superior sight ranges and resource multipliers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698679&quot; title=&quot;Weird. I find the balance for player vs AI to be actually pretty horrible. AI can outrange artillery sight so you have no choice but to push forward always or micro manage units. I have a fork of OpenRA on my GitHub where I try to address this, along with pathfinding bugs, enabling Tiberian Sun and fixing bugs with that. I also updated it to cross platform .NET 10 and bumped the performance up about 6-10x fixing minor bugs. Debating if I&amp;#39;ll roll any of the code over as pulls to the main project…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697754&quot; title=&quot;I might suck but I found it really hard iirc :^(&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697849&quot; title=&quot;AI in strategy games always cheats I haven’t seen a single game where the AI wasn’t built around cheating. Once you figure out how it cheats it’s usually a combination of resource multipliers, build time multipliers and not having a fog of war it becomes much essier to beat at any difficulty.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical limitations are a significant pain point, specifically a save/load system that requires replaying the entire game history, leading to massive load times on large maps &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698785&quot; title=&quot;The load/save is what kills me.  It&amp;#39;s a great project, but having to wait 2 hours for a game to load, fans blaring on my laptop, makes it less playable. For context, I love huge, massive maps with loads of players.  OpenRA replays the entire game to restore, it doesn&amp;#39;t have a save-current-state routine. So 20 hours of massive map + 8 players means 2 hours of pegged CPU to reload the save. Heartbreaking.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Other contributors shared nostalgic anecdotes about the &amp;#34;Hell March&amp;#34; soundtrack&amp;#39;s versatility and the modern potential of using LLMs to script RTS behaviors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697993&quot; title=&quot;Tangential, but I got introduced to Red Alert C&amp;amp;C through various &amp;#39;Hell March&amp;#39; videos by random fans of various militaries on YouTube. It&amp;#39;s funny how it vibes with nearly every military you throw it over.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698068&quot; title=&quot;I love using the RA OST for coding.  The songs are fun and fast paced with low lyrics. It helps that this is a childhood favorite game of mine.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697862&quot; title=&quot;When I was a teen I was mostly writing RA2 custom map scripts and rules/units for my friends and watch them battle with my rules in internet cafes. When that was not possible, I was creating custom RA2 AIs, but it was very hard. These days, I&amp;#39;m having incredible fun developing good old AI scripts with LLMs, for my own vibe-coded RTS game. Just choose all AI players here to make them battle each other: https://egeozcan.github.io/unnamed_rts/game/ I even let the LLM generate a tournament script…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://w.pitula.me/fintech-engineering-handbook/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Fintech Engineering Handbook&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (w.pitula.me)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696982&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;620 points · 215 comments · by signa11&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Fintech Engineering Handbook outlines essential software patterns for building trustworthy financial systems based on three core principles: no invented data, no lost data, and no trust. It covers critical topics including precise money representation, double-entry bookkeeping, idempotent execution, and defensive strategies for interacting with unreliable external APIs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://w.pitula.me/fintech-engineering-handbook/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Fintech Engineering Handbook    URL Source: https://w.pitula.me/fintech-engineering-handbook/    Published Time: Sat, 27 Jun 2026 12:15:17 GMT    Markdown Content:  Welcome to the Fintech Engineering Handbook. This resource aims to describe the most important patterns used in software engineering, where money is the primary focus of the system. It can be read in full to get a comprehensive understanding or in parts when dealing with a particular problem.    ### For…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary debate centers on whether monetary values should be represented as integers (minor units) or strings to avoid precision loss. While some argue that integer cents are an industry standard for fast, reliable math &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697606&quot; title=&quot;I glanced, and I found this handbook shallow and - in some areas - even bad advice. E.g. If I ever see a monetary value stored in something else than integers I&amp;#39;m going to run away screaming (thank you Rust decimals represented as JSON floats). It&amp;#39;s always integers unless you have a VERY good reason to do otherwise (though exported view can be in anything, even in weird bitcoded formats). FX exchange. Resolution of FX isn&amp;#39;t a point-in-time thing, things like buyer rate-in-time, seller…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697694&quot; title=&quot;Having done HFT / low-latency in C++ with a browser based (read: JavaScript) management front-end: Go ahead and use integer cents everyone. It’s practically an industry standard and it works just fine. Anything else is a worse compromise.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that this approach fails when dealing with varying currency precisions—such as stablecoins—and advocate for using strings in JSON APIs to bypass floating-point parsing issues &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697271&quot; title=&quot;Word of advice to anyone considering the &amp;#39;minor-units precision&amp;#39; strategy for representing monetary amounts: Don&amp;#39;t (or at least, don&amp;#39;t use it as an interchange/API data format). It seems like a clever idea (fast integer math, no rounding problems for addition and subtraction), but it&amp;#39;ll bite you incredibly hard if you ever stumble upon an edge case such as working with a partner that has a different implied number of digits for a given currency. This is especially relevant for stablecoins,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698623&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; thank you Rust decimals represented as JSON floats What do you mean? JSON doesn’t have floats, it has numbers, and how they’re used after being parsed is not part of the spec. &amp;gt; If I ever see a monetary value stored in something else than integers I&amp;#39;m going to run away screaming That’s good, then we’ll likely not be working on the same system :) I consider running from “amounts as integer” systems these days (but usually unfortunately can’t). In an idealized codebase that only seasoned…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697384&quot; title=&quot;A string type. As parent says: it completely bypasses the problem. Save the numbers between double quotes and be done with it.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics of the &amp;#34;Handbook&amp;#34; itself question its depth, suggesting it may be &amp;#34;AI slop&amp;#34; or offer shallow advice regarding complex financial realities like FX resolution and event sourcing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697606&quot; title=&quot;I glanced, and I found this handbook shallow and - in some areas - even bad advice. E.g. If I ever see a monetary value stored in something else than integers I&amp;#39;m going to run away screaming (thank you Rust decimals represented as JSON floats). It&amp;#39;s always integers unless you have a VERY good reason to do otherwise (though exported view can be in anything, even in weird bitcoded formats). FX exchange. Resolution of FX isn&amp;#39;t a point-in-time thing, things like buyer rate-in-time, seller…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697165&quot; title=&quot;Sorry have to ask these days. Is this carefully written down information from years of experience in the field or AI slop?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dervis.de/physical/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The case for physical media ownership&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (dervis.de)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697335&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;476 points · 351 comments · by cemdervis&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Physical media ownership ensures permanent access to content, whereas digital &amp;#34;purchases&amp;#34; are often revocable licenses subject to removal, censorship, or server shutdowns. Unlike digital files, physical copies retain resale value, provide superior audio-visual quality, and preserve original versions of works without the risk of remote alteration or account-based restrictions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dervis.de/physical/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Case for Physical Media Ownership    URL Source: https://dervis.de/physical/    Published Time: 2026    Markdown Content:  ## Digital Purchases Often Mean Licensed Access    *   drm When a digital store labels a movie, game, or book as a purchase, the transaction is usually a _revocable license_ rather than ownership of the file. The store and rights holder retain substantial control.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate centers on whether true ownership requires physical media &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699329&quot; title=&quot;I would emphatically not do this, because you&amp;#39;re confusing legal ownership with physical ownership and only one can be guaranteed with reasonable certainty. Honestly, I&amp;#39;m continually surprised at how badly people miss this even as, e.g. Sony et al just take away stuff you &amp;#39;bought.&amp;#39; So, to put directly. Do not reword it, you will screw it up. You must be able to hold it in your hand.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt; or if DRM-free digital files (e.g., from GOG or Bandcamp) provide sufficient agency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698300&quot; title=&quot;I agree with the sentiment implied by the author, but I would reword it slightly. If you don&amp;#39;t have the freedom to share something, you don&amp;#39;t own it. I disagree with the interpretation that it needs to be held physically. Digital ownership is still ownership. I go out of my way to find music on Bandcamp, games on GOG, and rip movies myself using MakeMKV. I wish I could encourage people to continue embracing physical media but most people value convenience over true ownership. And most companies…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Many argue that piracy is a &amp;#34;product problem&amp;#34; rather than a price problem, as enthusiasts often produce high-quality, unencumbered rips that the industry refuses to sell at any price &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697884&quot; title=&quot;Just pirate it. They can&amp;#39;t tell you this but there&amp;#39;s a quagmire of rights, licenses, agreements, treaties... and you can untangle this Goridan Knot by just pirating, especially media, for your own use. There are pixel perfect 4k drm-free rips out there made by people who poured thousands of hours into understanding codecs. They will work on any platform, forever, you can stream them or play offline. These rips can be freely distributed to friends and family, your kids will be able to play them,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698769&quot; title=&quot;Another thing that always needs pointing out: that ad-free, copyable, unencumbered, pixel perfect 4K drm-free rip with multiple language audio streams, hand crafted accurate subtitles, chapter tags, and embedded poster art cannot be bought from the movie industry at any price. That&amp;#39;s why piracy is a product problem, not a price problem. The industry refuses to produce and offer the superior product, so regardless of the price, piracy is the only way to get it.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some view subscription services as a revolutionary trade-off for access &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697991&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t buy the strange fascination with owning physical things. The other side of this is something no one speaks about: Spotify, youtube made it possible for me to listen to _any_ music from anywhere. This kind of profound open access to art should not just be dismissed. The concerns about price increase are laughable because without spotify I wouldn&amp;#39;t be exposed to this music in the first place. I think the obsession with owning it physically is because of many reasons 1. a sense of identity…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others highlight the &amp;#34;grim&amp;#34; reality of revocable licenses, citing instances where Sony removed previously purchased content due to licensing shifts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698121&quot; title=&quot;Sony&amp;#39;s one sentence notice is pretty grim considering how much money they made from these sales (sorry licensing). From September 1, 2026, due to our content licensing agreements, you will no longer be able to access your previously purchased content from Studio Canal, and it will be removed from your video library. Thank you,  PlayStation Store [1] At least in 2023 it was two sentences and then they somehow negotiated new licencing arrangements after the massive backlash 10 days before the end…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699471&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m curious what would take for regular people (i.e. people off HN) to realize what is pointed in the article is a real problem. In my experience, every time I mention this I&amp;#39;m labeled as: nostalgic old guy, Don Quixote wannabe, tinfoil hat supporter, pirate nerd who doesn&amp;#39;t understand people just want convenience. I&amp;#39;ve seen people bit by losing access to purchased content shrug and say &amp;#39;yeah, that&amp;#39;s bad isn&amp;#39;t it? at least I was able to watch it before they removed it&amp;#39;. Sometimes I feel that&amp;#39;s…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Even physical media is not a guaranteed safeguard, as users have discovered that hardware like the PlayStation may require an internet connection to play a physical disc &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698216&quot; title=&quot;In some cases, even if you hold it you don&amp;#39;t own it. I tend to purchase a lot of blu-rays, in fact if I don&amp;#39;t buy the movie on Apple iTunes then it&amp;#39;s almost always the case that I buy the blu-ray; then once I have the blu-ray I go to the torrent sites and download a version of the movie. Why? Because I earn enough money that I feel like I have no excuse not to buy my media: but I also want it to be my media; and torrenting is more convenient than using blu-rays. The blu-rays have one more major…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/mood-by-microbe/202606/what-ozempic-does-to-the-gut-brain-axis&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What Ozempic does to the gut-brain axis&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (psychologytoday.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48701984&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;195 points · &lt;strong&gt;511 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by randycupertino&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Research suggests GLP-1 drugs like Ozempic may act as antidepressants by promoting the growth of gut microbes, specifically *Lactobacillus delbrueckii*. This bacterium produces endocannabinoids that reduce stress in the brain, indicating that the drug&amp;#39;s psychiatric benefits are driven by the gut-brain axis rather than weight loss alone. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/mood-by-microbe/202606/what-ozempic-does-to-the-gut-brain-axis&quot; title=&quot;Title: Ozempic and other GLP-1 drugs may impact gut microbes and mood in unexpected ways.    URL Source: https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/mood-by-microbe/202606/what-ozempic-does-to-the-gut-brain-axis    Published Time: 2026-06-23T11:35:01-04:00    Markdown Content:  Do not sell or share my personal information![Image 1](https://cdn-cookieyes.com/assets/images/close.svg)    We use third-party cookies to analyze site usage, store preferences, and deliver relevant content and ads. You can opt out…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether GLP-1 drugs address the root causes of obesity or merely suppress symptoms, with some arguing that weight regain after cessation proves underlying habits remain unchanged &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48702471&quot; title=&quot;Studies show almost all subjects regained the weight and reversed gains within 2 years. This means underlying issues (e.g., food addiction) aren&amp;#39;t being addressed. Short of changing habits, the only maintenance solution is lifelong drug use and that doesn&amp;#39;t sit well with me.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48703588&quot; title=&quot;No, the symptom is being treated, not the underlying issue.  And that&amp;#39;s ok, but treating the underlying issue, when possible, is better, as the problem ceases to exist.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While critics suggest that lifestyle modifications should be prioritized over lifelong pharmaceutical dependence &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48702564&quot; title=&quot;I think there&amp;#39;s a distinct difference between taking medicine for things you can fix on your own (diet + exercise) vs things you cannot (excess acid production).&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48702730&quot; title=&quot;If they were a normal weight they would not have been prescribed the drug. The underlying issue is they&amp;#39;re overweight because they eat too much. Anything more is speculation. There is usually no free lunch when it comes to pharma, and extrapolating long term or lifetime dependence as being equivalent to short term interventions is an unsupported leap.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, proponents argue that the drugs effectively treat biological &amp;#34;starvation mode&amp;#34; and chronic hunger &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48702178&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d take them even if they didn&amp;#39;t make me lose weight - and I&amp;#39;m the type of person that doesn&amp;#39;t like takeing Tylenol unless absolutely necessary. The best way I can describe it: my body and mind are no longer is in starvation mode. I plan, do, act and sleep well.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48703635&quot; title=&quot;For many people, the &amp;#39;underlying issue&amp;#39; is fundamentally just being too hungry for how they live. GLP-1s absolutely treat that.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond weight loss, users report notable psychological benefits, such as the cessation of compulsive behaviors like impulse shopping &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48702260&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m on GLP-1 and it&amp;#39;s completely stopped my urge to online shop.  I used to browse/shop for fun and out of habit or when I was stressed out or wanted a treat etc.  Entirely resolved!  I&amp;#39;ve also lost 40lbs on it.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ipcrawl.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;IP Crawl: Living atlas of open webcams discovered on the public internet&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ipcrawl.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700834&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;328 points · 162 comments · by arm32&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IP Crawl is a new searchable database and map featuring nearly 14,000 live, unsecured webcams discovered on the public internet, allowing users to filter streams by location and manufacturer or check if their own devices are exposed. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ipcrawl.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: IP Crawl — open webcam catalog    URL Source: https://ipcrawl.com/    Markdown Content:  # [IP CRAWL BETA](https://ipcrawl.com/)    13,869 cameras    [Map](https://ipcrawl.com/map)[Stats](https://ipcrawl.com/stats)[About](https://ipcrawl.com/about)    A living atlas of open webcams discovered on the public internet — browse, filter and watch them live from the edge.    [alec.is](https://alec.is/)[r/ipcrawl](https://reddit.com/r/ipcrawl)[Am I Being Watched? Check if any camera near you is exposed.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discovery of a &amp;#34;living atlas&amp;#34; of open webcams has sparked a debate over whether viewing these feeds constitutes a voyeuristic invasion of privacy or a necessary exposure of poor security &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48702142&quot; title=&quot;Everyone: For a moment forget everything you know about computers and wonder if perhaps 99% of normies are just following the directions on the package of their $19 Chinese IP camera. They have no idea what a firewall is, or what the &amp;#39;public internet&amp;#39; even means. There&amp;#39;s also a difference between your neighbor not closing her blinds and you using a telescope to look inside her apartment, which is what sites like this are.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48701168&quot; title=&quot;This website---naturally, I think---weirds me out. Many of these cameras are in private spaces, with some places you most certainly don&amp;#39;t want people to have live feeds of. It&amp;#39;s quite disturbing how you can see personal snapshots of people&amp;#39;s lives without them knowing. There&amp;#39;s a perverse feeling of dread about being able to see into someone&amp;#39;s life and being able to paradoxically watch someone eat dinner alone, seemingly so detatched from human connection even with someone watching like some…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48701157&quot; title=&quot;Definitely an invasion of privacy. I can’t visit this website in good faith. It should be taken down. The point is valuable, and the mission is important, but the ends do not justify the means. If this must be shared, at least use static pictures and don’t stream the content for viewers.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that any room with a networked camera is inherently non-private, others contend that users are often victims of &amp;#34;sharing by default&amp;#34; product designs and a lack of technical knowledge regarding firewalls and IP addresses &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48701242&quot; title=&quot;If the room has an IP camera in it, it is by definition not private. Since cheap cameras have begun to appear everywhere I treat them all as if they were publicly viewable. I&amp;#39;m not going to hide from them, but I save my more thorough ear cleanings and ass scratchings for home.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48701855&quot; title=&quot;Every consumer tech company I’ve worked for had at least one guy who was a PM or a PM like role, who would say things like “InfoSec UX is confusing! Users don’t want to deal with IP addresses and firewalls and passwords and keys. We need to make the product easier to share by default!” This scenario seems to be what happens when anyone actually listens to That Guy. Sharing on the internet should be one of the hardest things to do in your product. You need to make enough friction that the user…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48701600&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If the room has an IP camera in it, it is by definition not private. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. So if I put an IP camera inside your bedroom without your notice or consent, and hook that up to the Internet, you&amp;#39;d be okay with that? Because it&amp;#39;s public! A lot of these are probably from default or misconfigurations. A lot of these people with IP cam feeds visible to the Internet probably do not know they are open.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48701667&quot; title=&quot;You&amp;#39;ve read the comment the wrong way. The intent was to say &amp;#39;You cannot call a space private if it has a networked camera in it.&amp;#39; Not &amp;#39;only a public space can host a camera&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. To mitigate these risks, commenters suggest that manufacturers must introduce more friction into the sharing process or ensure that secure configurations are accessible to non-technical users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48701855&quot; title=&quot;Every consumer tech company I’ve worked for had at least one guy who was a PM or a PM like role, who would say things like “InfoSec UX is confusing! Users don’t want to deal with IP addresses and firewalls and passwords and keys. We need to make the product easier to share by default!” This scenario seems to be what happens when anyone actually listens to That Guy. Sharing on the internet should be one of the hardest things to do in your product. You need to make enough friction that the user…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48701952&quot; title=&quot;The answer is to make sharing secure, easy, and with informed consent. The answer is not to impose IP addresses, NAT routing, keys, etc. so that only technical people can give their consent.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/27/asian-ai-startups-launch-mythos-like-models-as-anthropics-export-ban-drags-on/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Asian AI startups launch Mythos-like models&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techcrunch.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697958&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;268 points · 193 comments · by bogdiyan&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Asian startups Sakana AI and 360 have launched new AI models to rival Anthropic’s Mythos and Fable 5 as a U.S. export ban restricts global access to the American firm&amp;#39;s cybersecurity-focused tools. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/27/asian-ai-startups-launch-mythos-like-models-as-anthropics-export-ban-drags-on/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Asian AI startups launch Mythos-like models as Anthropic’s export ban drags on    URL Source: https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/27/asian-ai-startups-launch-mythos-like-models-as-anthropics-export-ban-drags-on/    Published Time: 2026-06-27T12:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  On Wednesday, Chinese cybersecurity firm 360 [reportedly](https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/chinas-360-says-it-has-developed-tools-match-anthropics-mythos-2026-06-24/) unveiled Tulongfeng, an AI tool it says can go…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion is heavily skeptical of these new models, with users questioning the validity of self-reported benchmarks and dismissing the technology as mere distillation of existing models like Anthropic&amp;#39;s &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698474&quot; title=&quot;First impression: Third-party benchmarks or gtfo. Personally, I&amp;#39;ve never heard of either of these companies before. We&amp;#39;re just supposed to take their word that they&amp;#39;ve matched the best models on the market? Sakana describes their model as a &amp;#39;Orchestration Model.&amp;#39; Does that mean that it&amp;#39;s actually a bunch of different models glued together?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698362&quot; title=&quot;Are we supposed to be impressed? They distilled Anthropic’s models and pat themselves on the back for it. Pathetic.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. One notable anecdote details a user spending $120 on a subscription only to find the performance significantly slower, more expensive, and lower quality than Claude Opus &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700342&quot; title=&quot;I tried the Fugu models with some real world tales in C# and unity using mcp and open code. I exhausted the $20 plan 5 hour window in one prompt to review my theme system and plan some color changes. So I upgraded to the $100 to see the implementation and result. Well the result was worse than Opus, incredibly slow, and I ended up exhausting the new 5 hour window and have used 35% of the weekly now and it hardly created something opus was able to do at a fraction of the time and cost. Do what…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate whether building top-tier models requires &amp;#34;secret knowledge&amp;#34; or simply massive resources &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698802&quot; title=&quot;Is it actually that hard to make good models or is it just about the amount of resources you have to do training? (This is an actual question, I really don&amp;#39;t know.) I&amp;#39;m sure it&amp;#39;s not trivial but does it really take world class secret knowledge to build off of the known existing techniques? I feel like there&amp;#39;s tons of low hanging fruit still to explore, and time and resources are the limiting factor.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698842&quot; title=&quot;The gap between grok and Gemini to Claude and chatgpt suggests that yes it is that hard.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that the window for these companies to IPO is closing as the market becomes oversaturated with high-cost, low-profit tokens &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698454&quot; title=&quot;Feels like I need to repeat myself more than once a day now: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697258 &amp;gt; These companies providing tokens, whether SOTA or not, that want to IPO are so fucked as time goes on. &amp;gt;Can&amp;#39;t sell their SOTA models, only slightly better than the open source models for the models they can sell, cost 20x to 50x for good models, a TAM that consists almost solely of developers, with no customer of theirs actually boasting increased profits as a result of AI... &amp;gt; I fear…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cauenapier.com/blog/townsquare_release/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Turn your site into a place people can bump into each other&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cauenapier.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699928&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;305 points · 130 comments · by eustoria&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TownSquare is a lightweight presence layer that allows website owners to see and interact with live visitors in real time, transforming static sites into shared social spaces. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cauenapier.com/blog/townsquare_release/&quot; title=&quot;Related: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Show HN: TownSquare, a tiny presence layer for websites&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; - https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&amp;amp;#x2F;item?id=48608570 - June 2026 (166 comments)&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The project aims to humanize the web by visualizing real-time site visitors as avatars, though some users found the resulting visual clutter and rapid comments overwhelming during high-traffic periods &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700881&quot; title=&quot;Not sure how this is appealing at all. I see a bunch of stick figures moving rapidly and comments flashing too quickly to read. I gave up as it wasn&amp;#39;t obvious at all what to do or how to particpate.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700912&quot; title=&quot;The issue is that my site right now is too crowded giving this post reached a good position on HN. On regular days, this are much calmer.  You can check other sites using the Townsquare on https://townsquare.cauenapier.com/ (fixed link).  Check out the map.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While the creator prioritized a &amp;#34;forgetful&amp;#34; design to avoid social media tropes, critics argue that true &amp;#34;old web&amp;#34; nostalgia stems from permanent identities and recurring personas rather than anonymity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700620&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The goal wasn&amp;#39;t to build another social network.      &amp;gt; It was to bring back a small feeling that the web used to have: the sense that there are actual people on the other side of the screen.      &amp;gt; Town Square is intentionally tiny and forgetful. There are no accounts, no profiles, no follower counts, no permanent chat history. Messages exist only while people are there to read them. Cute idea! But maybe this is just me having a different experience, but people having accounts/permanence was…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700635&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m actually thinking about implementing some sort of &amp;#39;permanence&amp;#39; for some people, specially for recurring visitors of a given site.  But that&amp;#39;s still an early thought.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700994&quot; title=&quot;Would that be a little guy permanently on the page even if the user isn’t present, or a permanent persona for a user across visits?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also shifted toward the value of digital tools that facilitate offline, physical interaction, such as fitness games or local hobbyist meetups, rather than purely online social spaces &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700923&quot; title=&quot;I hope sites that just provide a way for people to assemble offline will be the new thing soon. A photography guide&amp;#39;s site that rallies amateurs for walk tours. A planning board for a foreign language practice group. A site with a schedule and registration form for a sports event. When I read &amp;#39;online social&amp;#39; my head thinks &amp;#39;not-really social&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48701161&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m working on a game that helps with this. You leave your little bunker in a post-apocalyptic world and find the land around you contaminated. You walk, run, any workout, to claim territory around you, and gain energy you can use to clean up. You start building greenhouses to grow food and start rebuilding the ecosystem. It&amp;#39;s all on the real world map underneath you, and all the interactions between people in the game are cooperative: you get more benefits helping another player with most…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700735&quot; title=&quot;Fun! People in a town square still have identities. They are just likely to not know each other. I think this is a significant part of a great idea. What it, and most/all other communication software is missing, is the ability to continue a conversation into a new context. It would be great to move a convo from the public square into a shop, then maybe share contact info to get together another day.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://evilbit.de/dns-resolver-guide.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Choosing a Public DNS Resolver&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (evilbit.de)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48702273&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;273 points · 129 comments · by pawal&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This comprehensive guide provides an interactive tool and research-backed analysis to help users select a public DNS resolver based on priorities like privacy, speed, security filtering, and jurisdiction. &lt;a href=&quot;https://evilbit.de/dns-resolver-guide.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Choosing a Public DNS Resolver    URL Source: https://evilbit.de/dns-resolver-guide.html    Published Time: Sun, 28 Jun 2026 21:33:40 GMT    Markdown Content:  DNS Resolver Guide    Independent reference    Pick what matters to you, such as privacy, malware blocking, parental controls, speed, IPv6, or a specific jurisdiction, and the finder narrows 30 global public resolvers to the ones that fit. A full comparison table and research-backed decision notes follow.    30 public resolvers    16…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide between users who prioritize privacy and reliability through local recursive resolvers like Unbound and those who prefer ISP-provided DNS for lower latency and better CDN routing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48703136&quot; title=&quot;I use Unbound locally as a DoH server.  The Alpine Linux Unbound package is compiled with libnghttp2, required for the built in DoH listener .  That&amp;#39;s more than enough to enable ECH [1]. I pre-cache all the domains I use hourly via cron.  My ISP is not going to dork with my DNS requests and their employees are bigger deviants than I.  If I ever started browsing the web from a phone I would just set up my own public DoH server.  It only takes a few minutes and gives me my own query logs for…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707042&quot; title=&quot;Use your ISPs official DNS so that you get the shortest path possible from the ISPs handoff location to the CDN (and overseas trunks), not a generic DNS that doesn’t know about your ISPs layout. ISP: 1ms to Cloudflare Cloudflare: 10ms to Cloudflare Thank you for your attention to this matter. Edit: will clarify, this advice applies to countries with good privacy laws and no national surveillance i.e. not the USA&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48703886&quot; title=&quot;I always just set up root recursors at my home and other locations.  I&amp;#39;ve never noticed any downside.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that changing DNS offers minimal privacy gains due to visible SNIs, others use pre-caching and encryption (DoH/dnscrypt) to mitigate tracking and infrastructure failures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48703136&quot; title=&quot;I use Unbound locally as a DoH server.  The Alpine Linux Unbound package is compiled with libnghttp2, required for the built in DoH listener .  That&amp;#39;s more than enough to enable ECH [1]. I pre-cache all the domains I use hourly via cron.  My ISP is not going to dork with my DNS requests and their employees are bigger deviants than I.  If I ever started browsing the web from a phone I would just set up my own public DoH server.  It only takes a few minutes and gives me my own query logs for…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48703285&quot; title=&quot;I pre-cache for speed, verifying records that have expired since I retain the expired records for sites that have intermittent DNS issues and also to throw in domains that I do not use in the off chance someone is logging where I go and when.  They will see the Cloudflare top 20K domains hourly.  Myself and family members have been able to access sites when others around the internet can not due to infrastructure related DNS problems.  In other words, when others will say &amp;#39;It&amp;#39;s always DNS&amp;#39; for…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48703417&quot; title=&quot;Or you could use dnscrypt so ISP doesn’t see your lookups at all&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707489&quot; title=&quot;Changing your DNS does basically bupkis for privacy, since they can still read your DNS queries and SNIs.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable frustrations include the unreliability of malware blacklists on services like Quad9 and the technical friction of using custom DNS on public Wi-Fi with captive portals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48704477&quot; title=&quot;Does anyone have advice on how to use public wifi alongside DNS resolver? Many public wifi network works need you to use their DNS, so they can redirect you to a gated &amp;#39;accept ToS&amp;#39; screen (and may even require re-approval every 30-60 minutes). To resolve the issue is so frustrating: 1. realize the internet stopped working  2. ping google.com, wait for timeouts to show up.  3. try to guess if its a ISP issue, but then realize the wifi probably timed out.  4. Switch the dns. Flush DNS.  5. try to…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48703595&quot; title=&quot;Be cautious with Quad9; their main address (9.9.9.9) has a &amp;#39;malware&amp;#39; blacklist that has misfired several times already: twice for a private torrent tracker, once for gist.github.com, issue was resolved within minutes to hours. They have a non-filtered address (9.9.9.10), but it doesn&amp;#39;t do DNSSEC verification. IMO they&amp;#39;re too unreliable to be worth the hassle.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/streaming-services-obnoxiously-loud-ads-become-illegal-on-july-1-in-california/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Streaming services&amp;#39; obnoxiously loud ads become illegal on July 1 in California&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (arstechnica.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697768&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;284 points · 93 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Starting July 1, California law will prohibit streaming services from playing advertisements at a higher average volume than the programs they accompany. The legislation aims to provide streaming viewers with the same noise protections currently mandated for broadcast, cable, and satellite television under the federal CALM Act. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/streaming-services-obnoxiously-loud-ads-become-illegal-on-july-1-in-california/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Streaming services’ obnoxiously loud ads become illegal on July 1 in California    URL Source: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/streaming-services-obnoxiously-loud-ads-become-illegal-on-july-1-in-california/    Published Time: 2026-06-26T21:12:07+00:00    Markdown Content:  Manage your consent preferences    If you are a resident of Colorado, Connecticut, Virginia, Utah, Oregon, Texas, Montana, Delaware, Iowa, Nebraska, New Hampshire, and New Jersey, Tennessee, Minnesota, Maryland,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;California&amp;#39;s new law targeting loud streaming ads has sparked debate over whether the issue stems from technical complexity or corporate negligence. While some argue that normalizing audio across various ad providers and devices is a significant engineering challenge &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48702125&quot; title=&quot;but it&amp;#39;s not. it&amp;#39;s right there in what you quoted. the louder ads are coming from an ad provider. ad providers are the problem. loudness doesn&amp;#39;t have a standard. different streamers want different loudness settings. ad platforms would have to have multiple audio streams limited to the different loudness settings. it&amp;#39;s not a hard problem in the least, but one of adding to the complexity of content management. or the streaming platforms could take over ad delivery and take it on as part of their…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699228&quot; title=&quot;I think the point is that when you don’t control the ad, it’s a bit tough to normalize its audio. And controlling the ad means bringing ad serving in house, which while possible, is a huge engineering ask. I guess the solution is to switch to a proper ad insertion company that normalizes to -24 like you’re supposed to, but that’s not cake either. Especially if contracts are signed.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698811&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; See, that’s just flat-out lying. What’s this mythical circumstance where playing audio A at the same volume as audio B on one device will magically make A louder than Bon another? Regarding your second point: as any audio engineer or electronic musician knows, the same exact audio absolutely will sound very different on different speakers, depending on how well they replicate various sounds, what level of gain is being applied, and the volume (which is different from gain, although people…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others dismiss these claims as &amp;#34;flat-out lying&amp;#34; given that services have full control over their own output streams &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698746&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The groups argued that “many” streaming services were already trying to manage the “loudness of advertisements that come from server-side ad insertion that may be inconsistent with the loudness of the programs,” […]. Server-side ads can have differing volumes due to companies using various encoding pipelines. Boo-freaking-hoo. Cry me a river, poor streaming services without the technical know-how to calculate an ad’s volume. We can’t expect them to know how audio works! &amp;gt; Additionally, as the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700856&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; [...] opposed the bill. The groups argued that “many” streaming services were already trying to manage the “loudness of advertisements that come from server-side ad insertion that may be inconsistent with the loudness of the programs,” Well, stop &amp;#39;trying&amp;#39; and fix it already.  It&amp;#39;s your own damn system.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond audio, users noted similar frustrations with &amp;#34;obnoxiously bright&amp;#34; HDR advertisements on platforms like Instagram and YouTube, suggesting a need for broader regulations on sensory-intrusive digital marketing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700366&quot; title=&quot;Instagram does something similar - they have random ads in HDR which iOS will display at obnoxious brightness.  Just what you want as you scroll by trying to find someone you actually follow.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700974&quot; title=&quot;It looks great on the photos I took myself, but I wish there was a way to turn HDR off for certain apps or at least on demand. There are some YouTube videos online that I cannot even watch because they get too bright and saturated.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700703&quot; title=&quot;Waiting for California to ban obnoxiously bright electronic billboards next. The meatspace could use some love too.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://danluu.com/discontinuities/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Suspicious Discontinuities (2020)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (danluu.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698151&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;272 points · 99 comments · by tosh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article explores how sharp policy thresholds and &amp;#34;round number&amp;#34; goals create artificial discontinuities in data, incentivizing people to manipulate outcomes—such as losing money to qualify for subsidies, fudging research p-values, or prosecutors adjusting drug charges to trigger mandatory minimum sentences. &lt;a href=&quot;https://danluu.com/discontinuities/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Suspicious discontinuities    URL Source: https://danluu.com/discontinuities/    Published Time: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 19:59:24 GMT    Markdown Content:  If you read any personal finance forums late last year, there&amp;#39;s a decent chance you ran across a question from someone who was desperately trying to lose money before the end of the year. There are a number of ways someone could do this; one commonly suggested scheme was to buy [put options that were expected to expire…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights how &amp;#34;cliffs&amp;#34; or discontinuities in tax and legal systems often create perverse incentives, such as criminal organizations using minors to bypass harsher sentencing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700362&quot; title=&quot;Indian laws have the same too.  For taxation &amp;#39;surcharge&amp;#39; applied to high income groups, a patchwork called &amp;#39;marginal relief&amp;#39; fixes it [1], however, leaves ranges in income where 100% of incremental income goes away in taxes. [1] https://cleartax.in/s/marginal-relief-surcharge Another place where thresholding is misplaced is minors (below the age of 18 years) being subject to different laws (this is for India at least), e.g., seriously different punishments for crimes like homicide or rape.  I…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt; or individuals avoiding income to stay below subsidy thresholds &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699376&quot; title=&quot;[ EDIT: Since the undated article is actually from Feb 2020, predating the expansion of federal health insurance subsidies, I withdraw everything I said below. ] ---------------------------------- The opening story is fabricated and/or bullshit. Last year (2025) there was no limit on income for health insurance subsidies. That ended for this year, but last year there would have been no reason for anyone who knew what they were doing to try to lose money to drop their income (especially in the…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699005&quot; title=&quot;The UK tax system also has a bunch of unfortunate cliffs, and tapers that create &amp;gt;60% marginal tax rates and worse. There&amp;#39;s a calculator here that illustrates it well https://tax-cliffs.britishprogress.org/calculator The childcare cliff edge is probably the worst, but the personal allowance taper isn&amp;#39;t ideal either as it&amp;#39;s compressed over a relatively short income range And of course all the thresholds remain frozen, creating plenty of fiscal drag on top.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While gradients are proposed as a smoother alternative, some argue they are too complex for laypeople to understand, leading to misconceptions that earning more money results in a lower net income &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699180&quot; title=&quot;I never understood why taxes or similiar absolute points aren&amp;#39;t gradients instead.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699557&quot; title=&quot;I think because the gradient is simply too confusing for laypeople to understand. Even for a simple system like US social security that has a gradient. For every $2 you make over the limit, you lose $1 in benefits. I&amp;#39;ve heard countless times misconceptions of people thinking they&amp;#39;d be losing money (as in literally having less money net) by working.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, these thresholds can lead to &amp;#34;gaming&amp;#34; the system, whether through teachers subjectively bumping up test scores &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699250&quot; title=&quot;Would test score problem be solved if teachers graded individual questions, not entire test?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699390&quot; title=&quot;The reddit explanation in the post addresses your question I believe. If someone is at a 28 or 29 a few &amp;#39;charity&amp;#39; points can be found in subjectively-graded tests.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt; or engineers manipulating AWS latency metrics to meet specific performance targets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700940&quot; title=&quot;Jim Roskind had a really nice talk [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uaaCiyJCFA ] at AWS Reinvent 2022 which highlighted the fence post problem. Basically, AWS was targeting P50 and P90 latencies in many services, and sure enough there were big clumps of latencies right under those target fence posts as engineers were basically gaming the metrics and nerfing the &amp;gt;P90 latencies to make it happen.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48702724&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think that counts as gaming the metric. It&amp;#39;s an example of a metric that even when targeted in good faith results in consequences management didn&amp;#39;t intend.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fortune.com/2026/06/26/meta-wynn-williams-surveillance-gag-order-lawsuit-2026/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;#39;Careless People&amp;#39; author claims Meta surveilled her for 12mos to enforce silence&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (fortune.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48701822&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;208 points · 83 comments · by 1vuio0pswjnm7&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Author Wynn Williams has filed a lawsuit alleging that Meta conducted a 12-month surveillance campaign against her to enforce a non-disclosure agreement and prevent her from speaking about her time at the company. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fortune.com/2026/06/26/meta-wynn-williams-surveillance-gag-order-lawsuit-2026/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;LqnaQ&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;LqnaQ&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on allegations of &amp;#34;cruel and otherwise disturbing&amp;#34; behavior by Meta executives, including claims that Mark Zuckerberg threw tantrums over board games and Sheryl Sandberg engaged in sexual harassment and made racially insensitive remarks regarding domestic staff &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48702076&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Sarah Wynn-Williams served as director of global public policy at Facebook, now operating under parent company Meta Platforms Inc., from 2011 until her firing in 2017. “Careless People” alleges cruel and otherwise disturbing behavior by CEO Mark Zuckerberg and other executives. I would have liked to learn about specific allegations of &amp;#39;cruel and otherwise disturbing&amp;#39; from the article, instead of leaving this completely ambiguous. If you know, you know.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48702159&quot; title=&quot;He throws huge temper tantrums and pouts so much when he loses at board games while traveling on the facebook private jet so all his staff conspires to let him win. I read the book.  Also Sheryl Sandberg comes off pretty badly, buying $13,000 worth of lingerie for her &amp;#39;cutie&amp;#39; personal assistants and asking them to wear skimpy pajamas and snuggle with her in the bed on the corporate jet. There is a lot of corporate private jet related drama in the book.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48702286&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Ms. Wynn-Williams’s colleagues were frustrated that they could hear her baby in the background on late night work calls. As a proposed “solution,” Ms. Sandberg told Ms. Wynn-Williams that she should “[b]e smart and hire a Filipina nanny” because they are “English speaking, [have a] sunny disposition, and [are] service oriented.” This is a strange thing to emphasize, but I guess expected for law-trash. What do you think that pay is for? Stop being weird.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48702406&quot; title=&quot;Yikes. If it&amp;#39;s normal for a superior in any company you work for to tell you how to run your personal life, to include the race of the &amp;#39;service people&amp;#39; you need to hire on your own dime, you have some seriously toxic workplaces. I suppose it&amp;#39;s okay for Sandberg to also ask you to &amp;#39;come to bed&amp;#39; in the Meta private jet as well? (to be further met with a lack of surprise when you report it, because &amp;#39;half the department&amp;#39; had already reported that they&amp;#39;d shared a bed with Sandberg...) I guess the…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find the personal anecdotes trivial or question the author&amp;#39;s motivations after a prior settlement, others highlight more severe accusations of institutional misconduct, such as Zuckerberg allegedly granting China censorship powers and Sandberg&amp;#39;s reported disregard for employee boundaries &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48702114&quot; title=&quot;She was a Director of Global Public Policy from 2011 to 2017. Probably cleaned up. On the arbitration, they mentioned there was 300k in business expense reimbursement. Signed an NDA, went through arbitration, got paid out pretty nicely and now wants to cash in 10 years after the fact? Claimed it was signed due to &amp;#39;financial distress&amp;#39;. Give me a break. I&amp;#39;m sure this will be unpopular, but imagine the liability some employees are? Some person that shook you down comes back ten years later and…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48702406&quot; title=&quot;Yikes. If it&amp;#39;s normal for a superior in any company you work for to tell you how to run your personal life, to include the race of the &amp;#39;service people&amp;#39; you need to hire on your own dime, you have some seriously toxic workplaces. I suppose it&amp;#39;s okay for Sandberg to also ask you to &amp;#39;come to bed&amp;#39; in the Meta private jet as well? (to be further met with a lack of surprise when you report it, because &amp;#39;half the department&amp;#39; had already reported that they&amp;#39;d shared a bed with Sandberg...) I guess the…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters also expressed frustration with the lack of primary sources in the original article, leading users to share the official court complaint to provide further context &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48702177&quot; title=&quot;Exactly why I spent time to track down the complaint: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.47...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48702134&quot; title=&quot;I wish sites would link to the docket to provide a primary source. Here’s the complaint: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.47...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/general/michigan-spent-1-8-billion-and-only-created-602-jobs/ar-AA26Cusu&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Michigan spent $1.8B and only created 602 jobs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (msn.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48702060&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;195 points · 87 comments · by littlexsparkee&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Michigan spent $1.8 billion on economic development initiatives that resulted in the creation of only 602 jobs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/general/michigan-spent-1-8-billion-and-only-created-602-jobs/ar-AA26Cusu&quot; title=&quot;Title: Michigan spent $1.8 billion and only created 602 jobs    URL Source: https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/general/michigan-spent-1-8-billion-and-only-created-602-jobs/ar-AA26Cusu    Published Time: 1782492941    Warning: This page contains iframe that are currently hidden, consider enabling iframe processing.  Warning: This page contains shadow DOM that are currently hidden, consider enabling shadow DOM processing.  Warning: This is a cached snapshot of the original page, consider retry with caching…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely condemn the $1.8B expenditure as a form of corruption or a &amp;#34;laundering scam,&amp;#34; noting that the cost per job created is astronomically high compared to initial promises &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48702297&quot; title=&quot;selectively giving away free money to big business is straight corruption. there is no other way to put it. everyone involved should lose re election and get investigated by the financial crimes unit. but i dont think &amp;#39;leave it up to the market&amp;#39; is a better idea. investments like this just need to be transparent, open to everyone and set up strict punishment for stealing the money with prison for executives. if they wanted to actually create jobs they would support small companies and set up…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48702774&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Hohman examined eight major projects—&amp;#39;those that offered $100 million in payments and received significant media attention&amp;#39;—totaling $2.7 billion in promised incentives &amp;gt; All told, the governor said that her major subsidy projects would create 20,595 jobs in Michigan Even using these numbers that works out to $135k/job, which is bonkers!&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48702150&quot; title=&quot;That works out to 2.5 million per job. This is not the first time this type of thing happened almost looks like  a laundering scam.  Companies that do this should face real and very expensive consequences.  But we know that will never happen.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this represents a systemic failure of government waste that could be solved by lowering taxes, others suggest the programs are intentionally designed to generate headlines and campaign contributions rather than actual employment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48703294&quot; title=&quot;It will just be abused like the money for in-home daycares and elder care is. I&amp;#39;d rather they just lower our taxes and quit squandering our money on these programs that never work. I never once hear democrats looking to lower taxes or remove wasteful spending, it&amp;#39;s practically encouraged. They defend SNAP recipients buying soda and candy even while admitting there&amp;#39;s a correlation between SNAP recipients and having diabetes and being overweight. They do the wrong thing and know it and expect us…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48702284&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; A new report suggests the state of Michigan is the latest to learn that lesson the hard way. There doesn’t seem to be any lesson-learning happening, since governments keep trying this despite the outcome always being the same.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48703256&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;There doesn’t seem to be any lesson-learning happening... Which would indicate that creating jobs was not the actual reason for the grants. Given how trivially easy it would be fix the problem (simply make the grant contingent on the creation of jobs, otherwise it converts to a loan), the real purpose is probably a matter of generating headlines and raking in campaign contributions (with occasional full-on kickbacks probably happening as well). All of which it apparently does well enough that…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Proposed alternatives include shifting focus to small businesses, state-run investment banks, or direct funding for apprenticeships to ensure more transparent and effective job training &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48702297&quot; title=&quot;selectively giving away free money to big business is straight corruption. there is no other way to put it. everyone involved should lose re election and get investigated by the financial crimes unit. but i dont think &amp;#39;leave it up to the market&amp;#39; is a better idea. investments like this just need to be transparent, open to everyone and set up strict punishment for stealing the money with prison for executives. if they wanted to actually create jobs they would support small companies and set up…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48702517&quot; title=&quot;One idea I like is directly funding apprenticeship. It pays for job training and classroom instruction on a per-individual basis. The jobs are in long-term career sectors like advanced manufacturing, shipbuilding, aviation, healthcare, and technology. Here&amp;#39;s one example: https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/osec/osec20250923 In Georgia, the employer is reimbursed $2,500 when an apprentice starts and up to $10,000 when they finish. They can also get up to 75% of the apprentice&amp;#39;s hourly wage…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.openttd.org/news/2026/06/25/openttd-16-0-beta1&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OpenTTD 16.0-Beta1&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (openttd.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48695149&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;231 points · 46 comments · by untilted&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenTTD has released the first beta for version 16.0, introducing features such as backwards-driving trains, improved map generation, and custom NewGRF collections alongside the launch of a community competition to design the next title game. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.openttd.org/news/2026/06/25/openttd-16-0-beta1&quot; title=&quot;Title: OpenTTD | News | OpenTTD 16.0-beta1    URL Source: https://www.openttd.org/news/2026/06/25/openttd-16-0-beta1    Markdown Content:  We’ve been working on some exciting new features for OpenTTD 16, and they need testing! The first beta release is now available, and we’ve opened the competition to create the title game for the next release.    The first beta of OpenTTD 16 is now available with a host of new features including:    *   Trains can now drive backwards! ([read…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenTTD frequently reaches the front page due to its enduring popularity among programmers, though some users find the game&amp;#39;s deep modding ecosystem and complex signaling systems overwhelming to set up and learn &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48695803&quot; title=&quot;I always know what kind of game I want to play, but it&amp;#39;s overwhelming to set up, if even possible. It&amp;#39;s tons of packages, forums, idk.. so I just end up playing vanilla, with maybe some rules among the players. But I wish there was a comprehensive interface to allow me to set all the stuff that I want. From the top of my head (haven&amp;#39;t played in over a year) it would be: cargo destination for people, cargo prices reflect proximity of other productiosn, mono/maglev only has passenger cabs,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696349&quot; title=&quot;Sorry if it&amp;#39;s a meta post, or a faq, or if I&amp;#39;m just missing some HN lore here, but I finally have to ask : why is it that, everytime there&amp;#39;s a new release for OpenTTD (and 0ad, for that matters), it makes it to the front page ? I can kinda get why there are often news about Factorio, for example (it&amp;#39;s not subtly related to programming), and there is nothing wrong with open source projects getting visibily even when they&amp;#39;re not &amp;#39;yet another web framework&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;the last open weight LLM wrapper&amp;#39;.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48695877&quot; title=&quot;hah I played for an hour this new beta. It&amp;#39;s fun. I haven&amp;#39;t played for years. I couldn&amp;#39;t workout the train signals though, there are 4 of them and they have a digit as well with them, not sure what&amp;#39;s going on there. I&amp;#39;m probably not the target audience :)&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While the game works out of the box, critics argue the base economy is &amp;#34;nonsensical&amp;#34; compared to modern titles like *Transport Fever 2*, rewarding players for moving cargo over unnecessary distances &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48695874&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s actually not difficult to setup at all. The game just work out of the box without any mod. However there&amp;#39;s a learning curve. Find a tutorial somewhere online and follow it thru then you&amp;#39;re golden. It took me maybe an hour to learn the first time I played it. It&amp;#39;s worth it! :D Tho after finishing the game a few times it gets old.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696171&quot; title=&quot;That’s not what they said. The game does work without mods, but the economy is weirdly nonsensical (AFAIK you can push unnecessary amounts of cargo over long distances, and the game rewards you anyway) and I personally find it kind of pointless, compared to something like Transport Fever 2.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696314&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; the economy is weirdly nonsensical, you can push unnecessary amounts of cargo over long distances, and the game rewards you anyway Wait... same like in real life you mean?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical discussions highlight the game&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;spaghetti code&amp;#34; and the nuances of path-based signaling, which allows multiple trains to navigate a single block simultaneously &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48695972&quot; title=&quot;For most signalling you want the path signals. They come in 2 flavours: both kinds only do the path in one direction, one kind is non-blocking to trains running the opposite way, the other kind is blocking, one way only. This combo lets you set up an upline and downline with a terminal station: you have one way only signals on the line, and non-blocking signals on the station entrances pointing into the station, and a crossing between. Trains will get to the end of the upline, and wait to get a…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697022&quot; title=&quot;I made version 12.2 my programming hobby project. First time I tackled it years ago was to have it run at real time instead of the default fast pace (even with the day length patch). Worked great including a feature to really schedule routes and have working yards for vehicles to wait. But when I wanted to change internal mechanics to add other features I hit the spaghetti code wall several times (and the code after 12.2 is just more complex with every version bump). Took a break from it for a…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696613&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;This combo lets you set up an upline and downline with a terminal station: That actually is nothing to do with path based signals, and could be done quite simply with purely vanilla TTD signals. What path-based signaling allows is for multiple trains to make non-conflicting moves through a single block at the same time, which basic signals wouldn&amp;#39;t.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.sfwriter.com/wordstar.htm&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;WordStar: A Writer&amp;#39;s Word Processor (1996)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sfwriter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48694853&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;172 points · 92 comments · by droidjj&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Science fiction author Robert J. Sawyer advocates for WordStar for DOS, arguing its touch-typist interface and &amp;#34;long-hand page&amp;#34; metaphor better support creative composition than modern alternatives like Microsoft Word. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.sfwriter.com/wordstar.htm&quot; title=&quot;Title: Robert J. Sawyer: Hugo and Nebula Award-Winning Science Fiction Writer    URL Source: https://www.sfwriter.com/wordstar.htm    Published Time: Thu, 08 Aug 2024 16:09:55 GMT    Markdown Content:  Science Fiction Writer  ROBERT J. SAWYER  Hugo and Nebula Winner  HOME • MENU •   Search:     SFWRITER.COM &amp;gt; Nonfiction &amp;gt; WordStar        A Writer&amp;#39;s Word Processor  by Robert J. Sawyer  Copyright 1990 and 1996 by Robert J. Sawyer.    To download the full final version of WordStar — WordStar for DOS 7.0 Rev. D — along…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Modern users still value WordStar and WordPerfect for their distraction-free environments and intuitive keybindings, which some argue remain superior for creative prose &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697346&quot; title=&quot;I still like to start the first draft of anything substantial by moving to a single screen, opening FreeDOS, maximizing the window, and typing in Wordstar as if it were 1987. Hell, sometimes I&amp;#39;ll even put on a nylon windbreaker. I always preferred WordStar to WordPerfect, largely because WordStar&amp;#39;s keybindings were easy to learn and remember. WordPerfect, by contrast, seemed to require keyboard templates, a manual, a cheat sheet, and a certain amount of divine intervention.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48695954&quot; title=&quot;In the same way as WordStar, there&amp;#39;s a community of DOS WordPerfect 6.0 users who claim with some validity that it&amp;#39;s still the best for writing prose&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48695542&quot; title=&quot;That looks like a different type of writing, perhaps research or business writing. Wordstar like editors that bring simplicity and a distraction free environment are best suited for creative writing.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While enthusiasts enjoy the nostalgia and focus of these DOS-era tools, critics point out that they struggle with modern workflows involving cross-referencing, complex file management, and data export &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48695247&quot; title=&quot;These programs are great for sitting down and writing with no distractions, but if you have a setup with directories full of word docs, text files, various graphics, even excel sheets all related to what you are working on that you need to refer to and cross-reference, they are less useful than an older version of Word or OpenOffice/LibreOffice. And they are difficult to export, share... there&amp;#39;s a reason we don&amp;#39;t use typewriters anymore, or DOS programs whose output is confined within a single…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696126&quot; title=&quot;I grew up using WordStar on the Apple ][.  It was great when all you had was an 80 column card, a green phosphor screen and a keyboard, but I was never sad to leave it behind when GUIs were invented.  I have nostalgia for the time, sure, but not for that interface and the multi-key-stroke commands you had to learn by rote. Each to their own, and of course finding an optimal writing environment is a very subjective thing -- but it&amp;#39;s not like there aren&amp;#39;t modern distraction-free writing…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48695631&quot; title=&quot;A large fantasy adventure could easily have supporting documents with cities stats, characters, races, maps etc.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these limitations, the software persists in niche professional circles like legal services and is famously used by authors like George R. R. Martin &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696229&quot; title=&quot;In the UK at least it crops up a lot in legal circles. Quite often solicitors have stuff on 3.5&amp;#39; or even 5.25&amp;#39; floppies that need read, converted from WordPerfect into something modern, and delivered as maybe a PDF or Word Doc. Fortunately, solicitors tend not to be short of money (that they bill their client for) so they can often find &amp;#39;a guy who knows a guy&amp;#39; who can get that precious floppy onto a USB stick. Occasionally I am the guy who the guy knows, and it buys me the odd case of…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48695491&quot; title=&quot;I believe George R. R. Martin uses wordstar to write his books. I still hold a little hope that he will finish A Song of Ice and Fire series.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-many-elementary-particles-are-there-really-20260615/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How Many Elementary Particles Are There, Really?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (quantamagazine.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697746&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;126 points · 110 comments · by rwmj&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the Standard Model typically lists 17 elementary particles, physicists argue the true count could range from 17 to 995.5 depending on whether one includes antiparticles, color charges, chirality, and mathematical degrees of freedom. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-many-elementary-particles-are-there-really-20260615/&quot; title=&quot;How Many Elementary Particles Are There, Really? | Quanta Magazine    Plausible answers range from 17 to — in all seriousness — 995.5.    [Quanta Homepage](/)    * [Physics](https://www.quantamagazine.org/./physics/)  * [Mathematics](https://www.quantamagazine.org/./mathematics/)  * [Biology](https://www.quantamagazine.org/./biology/)  * [Computer Science](https://www.quantamagazine.org/./computer-science/)  * [Topics](/topics)  * [Archive](https://www.quantamagazine.org/archive/)    * [Special…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether elementary particles are fundamental or merely manifestations of underlying quantum fields &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698753&quot; title=&quot;You don&amp;#39;t have to wonder, because they are. They&amp;#39;re manifestations of fields. I think it is a reasonable answer to tell people &amp;#39;if you&amp;#39;re looking for the short list of simplest things, the number of types of fields there are is probably what you&amp;#39;re looking for&amp;#39;. That doesn&amp;#39;t invalidate this question in general, though the number of different answers from people looking at the same thing suggests it may be underspecified.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698834&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; They&amp;#39;re manifestations of fields. Or wave. Everything is a quantum wave. https://www.vlatkovedral.com/everything-in-the-universe-is-a...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698992&quot; title=&quot;In QFT every particle type has its own field.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that particles are &amp;#34;illusions&amp;#34; of probability waves &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698859&quot; title=&quot;How long can you break something apart until you cannot any longer? The things we are breaking apart are illusions in a sense. There will always be a smaller particle because that is what we are looking for. When we understand that everything that we see is a manifestation of a probability wave, then we will understand everything is a wave and end these foolish experiments.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest that the current count of particles is too high, potentially pointing toward simpler components like strings or emergent properties from a more basic reality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699145&quot; title=&quot;But of course one can then question why are there exactly N different types of fields, with their specific types of interaction (at least in our universe)? Why should we suppose that this is the most fundamental description of reality, rather than being emergent from something else?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698688&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s what the various string theory proponents start from. There&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;too many&amp;#39; different subatomic particles, so there surely must be something smaller that they&amp;#39;re composed of?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant technical disagreement exists regarding how to count these entities: critics argue that distinguishing particles by chirality is arbitrary &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700003&quot; title=&quot;Physicist here. I don’t buy some of these distinctions, like the chirality. Chirality is an observable, it’s like saying there are two photons because they can come in two polarizations, but polarization is not an inherent property: it depends on how we measure it. So I could describe any photon in the left/right chiral basis just as well as in the vertical/horizontal basis or any two antipodal points in the Poincaré sphere, so which is the “right one”? Neither. Spin on the other hand (which is…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt; and that labeling gluons as &amp;#34;eight&amp;#34; distinct types is mathematically misleading compared to their continuous nature &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699324&quot; title=&quot;Stopped reading after &amp;#39;Yet in the mathematical equations that define the Standard Model, the eight gluons are distinct from one another in the same way that the W and Z bosons differ.&amp;#39; W and Z bosons, photons, etc have fixed masses, charges, interaction strengths with other particles. These properties can exactly be listed and looked up in a table of elementary particles with discrete rows. Gluon color is continuous property in a vector space . Gluons can have any color in that space, with any…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cephalosec.com/blog/cybersecurity-in-the-post-mythos-era-keep-calm-and-carry-on/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Post-Mythos Cybersecurity: Keep calm and carry on&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cephalosec.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698559&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;169 points · 65 comments · by Versipelle&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Despite fears surrounding the advanced zero-day exploitation capabilities of Anthropic’s Mythos model, experts suggest that maintaining fundamental cybersecurity practices—such as attack surface reduction, zero-trust architecture, and AI-assisted defense—remains the most effective strategy against evolving automated threats. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cephalosec.com/blog/cybersecurity-in-the-post-mythos-era-keep-calm-and-carry-on/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Cybersecurity in the post-mythos era: Keep calm and carry on!    URL Source: https://cephalosec.com/blog/cybersecurity-in-the-post-mythos-era-keep-calm-and-carry-on/    Published Time: 2026-06-24T21:45:30.000Z    Markdown Content:  [CISOned Opinions](https://cephalosec.com/tag/cisoned/)  As some of those fears, uncertainties, and doubts about Mythos are starting to feel real, what can we do about it? Paradoxically, I believe that little needs to change in what we’ve been doing for years.    I have…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of the Mythos AI model under U.S. government control has sparked debate over the &amp;#34;unsustainable&amp;#34; nature of state-managed technology and the potential for asymmetric offensive advantages &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698560&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been brewing on this topic since Mythos preview was announced. As Mythos got finally released, then banned, then released again under U.S. government control, it was time to finally flesh it out and use it as a way to exit the lurker-zone on HN !&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698816&quot; title=&quot;Fair, let&amp;#39;s say a heavily staggered come back. I was actually pleased to see OpenAI openly (although timidly) complaining about the situation in their latest announcement, framing it as an unsustainable system. One can only guess the outrage in the news if the Chinese government had been the first to pull this kind of stunt.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699182&quot; title=&quot;The actual story here:  The Trump administration is going to choose which organizations get access to which AI models when. This will establish an asymmetry where the chosen organizations get to secure their stuff and break other people’s systems with each new model release. If you believe the “good guys” will be the ones given asymmetric offensive access, then you’re either severely misinformed or support things like ethnic cleansing (which these models are already being used for). Mythos’…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that LLMs are revolutionizing cybersecurity and capture-the-flag (CTF) competitions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48701212&quot; title=&quot;The CCC talk in December showed me how good llms are at ctf. Ctf fundamentaly have to change. It also showed how critical it is to use llms now. A lot has changed in just 12 month tbh. If you still don&amp;#39;t invest time and money into adding llms to your security you didn&amp;#39;t hear the bang.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, industry professionals contend that &amp;#34;fear porn&amp;#34; surrounding Mythos ignores the reality that technical debt, human error, and poor configurations remain the primary security threats &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699058&quot; title=&quot;The fear porn around this all has been horrible. I work in Cybersecurity and Mythos is all the vendors will talk about because they want to sell something. It started the day of the announcement which is what told me it was all BS. They had no information about it yet would happily tell me about all their solutions for it. Anyone in my profession worth a damn will tell you the vast majority of security issues are related to bad configurations and bad practices + accidents and bad luck.…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the situation has prompted comparisons to Chinese authoritarianism, with users debating whether Western government intervention mirrors the state-level control seen in China &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698857&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; outrage in the news if the Chinese government had been the first to pull this kind of stunt. I suspect that the Chinese government &amp;#39;pulls this kind of stunt&amp;#39; often but just nobody ever hears about it because their society is not free to complain about such a thing publicly.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699879&quot; title=&quot;You also have government apparatchiks influencing almost every corporate board, not just the state owned enterprises. Every private company that employs at least 3 CCP members is required by law to form a party committee within the company to represent party interests. In smaller companies, they will often simply coordinate with local governments on securing permits, etc, but I’m sure national party leadership communicates directly with the committees at the AI labs.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700522&quot; title=&quot;Democracy cannot be taken for granted. There are always tendencies to drift toward authoritarian. China is authoritarian, full stop. They are capitalism, not communism, but authoritarian. Keep that in mind when discussing what come out of China.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.beercss.com&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Beer CSS – Build material design in record time&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (beercss.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696510&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;136 points · 65 comments · by Seb-C&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Beer CSS is a lightweight framework that translates Material Design 3 into semantic HTML standards, allowing developers to quickly build responsive, themed interfaces using a comprehensive library of pre-built components, layouts, and dynamic color tools. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.beercss.com&quot; title=&quot;Title: Build material design in record time, without stress for devs    URL Source: https://www.beercss.com/    Published Time: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 12:10:31 GMT    Markdown Content:  _menu\_open_ _code_ Get started[_widgets_ App bars](javascript:;)[_widgets_ Badges](javascript:;)[_widgets_ Buttons](javascript:;)[_widgets_ Cards](javascript:;)[_widgets_ Checkboxes](javascript:;)[_widgets_ Chips](javascript:;)[_widgets_ Colors](javascript:;)[_widgets_ Containers](javascript:;)[_widgets_…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The community reaction is largely critical, with users highlighting significant visual flaws such as poor alignment, low color contrast, and a broken mobile experience that lacks proper margins or grids &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698113&quot; title=&quot;For a CSS design site, this looks fairly bad to my eye. I&amp;#39;m not any kind of UX expert, it just looks clunky: - Lots of text seems slightly offset. It&amp;#39;s not all centered within buttons etc. - The text also doesn&amp;#39;t seem to quite line up with the icon on said buttons (it feels relatively a little too high) - Similarly the text within the little notification popups (&amp;#39;New&amp;#39;) isn&amp;#39;t centered and hits the top of the outline - The colours have poor contrast. I don&amp;#39;t have any vision impairment but the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697520&quot; title=&quot;For a UI framework landing page, this looks impressively bad on mobile. Big Arial at random sizes. No margins, no grid, component examples scattered all over the screen.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699607&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s what I love about iPhone13 mini with Safari. You spot badly designed sites immediately. (This site&amp;#39;s buttons are too wide and it bumps from left to right when scrolling sideways.) It&amp;#39;s still a free CSS kit, but now I know there&amp;#39;s no care behind it.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697704&quot; title=&quot;Are you being a troll, or is there a trend afoot to ignore mobile rendering?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Many commenters expressed a strong dislike for Material Design itself, describing it as dated, tasteless, and visually &amp;#34;unfinished&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697350&quot; title=&quot;This is a great project, but material design was the worst thing that Google invented and implemented. Completely tasteless, visually unappealing. Would be nice to see such a project with anything else than material design.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698610&quot; title=&quot;Material design looks pretty dated these days. I&amp;#39;m wondering why people would still be using it? Is it just a taste thing or something people have been working with for a long time?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699880&quot; title=&quot;I could never get rid of the feeling that Material design looks like some stylesheets failed to load. It feels unfinished, raw, or temporary.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, there is frustration regarding the site&amp;#39;s technical implementation, specifically its reliance on JavaScript to display any content at all &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698595&quot; title=&quot;I only see a blank white page. I&amp;#39;d expect that people who are specifically trying to show me an interesting CSS library could make at least something show up on the page without JavaScript. As a matter of policy, I don&amp;#39;t whitelist sites that give me neither a clear reason nor initial content.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48699136&quot; title=&quot;Right, so it&amp;#39;s some JS SPA thing as well (of course). Out of interest, do you not often find this a problem these days? I feel like there&amp;#39;d be a lot of sites out there that are non-functional or literally do nothing without JS.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697561&quot; title=&quot;Welcome to the future! We better get used to it.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-06-26</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-06-26</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/06/26/openai-says-us-government-will-vet-users-its-latest-ai-model/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;U.S. government will decide who gets to use GPT-5.6&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (washingtonpost.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48690101&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1174 points&lt;/strong&gt; · &lt;strong&gt;1229 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by alain94040&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI has announced that the U.S. government will vet and approve all users of its latest AI model, GPT-5.6, to ensure the technology is used responsibly and securely. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/06/26/openai-says-us-government-will-vet-users-its-latest-ai-model/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;PCQQl&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;PCQQl&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters express deep concern that the U.S. government is creating a bottleneck for innovation through opaque, arbitrary interventions that lack a formal policy framework &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689189&quot; title=&quot;I hope this doesn&amp;#39;t become the new norm where government becomes the bottleneck for innovation in the AI space. It&amp;#39;s worrying that with no formal and transparent policy framework that the government will be picking winners and losers and stifling innovation. There&amp;#39;s been no public policy, executive order, legislation, or otherwise on this, I wonder if anyone has filed FOIA requests for these decisions or the conversations between the Executive Branch and AI companies.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689762&quot; title=&quot;Indeed, I find quite ironic that some people in tech in the US complain about EU &amp;#39;regulations first&amp;#39; approach, but then their government seem to arbitrarily stop things from being released because, well, there is no established policy on safety guarantees or other similar aspects.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689103&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;We believe in broad access, and we plan to make GPT‑5.6 Sol, Terra, and Luna generally available in the coming weeks. As part of our ongoing engagement with the U.S. government, we previewed our plans and the models’ capabilities ahead of today’s launch. At their request, we are starting with a limited preview for a small group of trusted partners whose participation has been shared with the government, before releasing more broadly. During this preview, we will continue testing and…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Many argue this represents &amp;#34;regulatory capture&amp;#34; that will stifle competition, encourage corruption, and ultimately destroy the U.S. lead in AI by driving users toward open-source alternatives or foreign models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692227&quot; title=&quot;This is regulatory capture in action. This will make it hard/impossible for new vendors to come into the market and only established companies will get to play, and charge, for LLMs. What does this mean for open source? Will it become illegal to download weights? What about train your own? Are we heading to a world where GPU use is regulated to ensure that illegal LLMs aren&amp;#39;t being processed on your machine? More broadly though, how will this stop anyone but average people? Countries outside…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48690567&quot; title=&quot;Im not worried about this at all. The OpenAI, Anthropic and the US government can play this game all they want... They&amp;#39;re just accelerating the development of open source models; and helping destroy the lead the US has built in AI, and their profit margins along with it. This is like the battle between PostgreSQL and Oracle all over. Move up market, isolate yourself to enterprises, and watch while everyone else builds on PostgreSQL and erodes any technical advantage you had, until people just…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48690707&quot; title=&quot;Given how the WH operates these days, this is ripe for corruption. Imagine the WH dislikes the CEO of a biotech company, while appreciating the attitude of a competitor CEO. What is to stop them from stalling on giving acess for the latest model to the company they don&amp;#39;t like?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Some draw parallels to historical export controls on cryptography or China’s recent crackdown on its own tech sector, warning that such restrictions may prove ineffective as powerful models become increasingly easy to train on local hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692227&quot; title=&quot;This is regulatory capture in action. This will make it hard/impossible for new vendors to come into the market and only established companies will get to play, and charge, for LLMs. What does this mean for open source? Will it become illegal to download weights? What about train your own? Are we heading to a world where GPU use is regulated to ensure that illegal LLMs aren&amp;#39;t being processed on your machine? More broadly though, how will this stop anyone but average people? Countries outside…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48690993&quot; title=&quot;I see it too, but worth noting that this is basically unprecedented at least within the last 25 years; I think you have to go back to export controlled cryptography for another example of this kind of abrupt and targeted regulation.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48683616&quot; title=&quot;Remember how China turned its tech industry into a smoking ruin - make making them all submit to political priorities: Ant Group: China halted Ant’s IPO and forced a restructuring Alibaba: China fined and politically disciplined Alibaba Didi: China punished Didi after its US listing by removing its apps, freezing users, forcing delisting Tutoring platforms: banned profit from core school-subject tutoring. Tencent gaming: restricted youth gaming froze approvals NetEase and gaming companies:…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openai.com/index/previewing-gpt-5-6-sol/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Previewing GPT‑5.6 Sol: a next-generation model&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (openai.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689028&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1123 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 737 comments · by minimaxir&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI has released a system card previewing GPT-5.6 Sol, a next-generation model, detailing its safety evaluations and deployment framework. &lt;a href=&quot;https://openai.com/index/previewing-gpt-5-6-sol/&quot; title=&quot;System card: &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;deploymentsafety.openai.com&amp;amp;#x2F;gpt-5-6-preview&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;deploymentsafety.openai.com&amp;amp;#x2F;gpt-5-6-preview&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The announcement of GPT-5.6 Sol has generated significant excitement regarding its 750 tokens-per-second speed on Cerebras hardware, which users believe could revolutionize real-time inference and tasks like codebase navigation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689959&quot; title=&quot;Easily the most interesting part of this announcement is buried in the second to last paragraph: &amp;#39;We&amp;#39;re also launching GPT‑5.6 Sol on Cerebras at up to 750 tokens per second in July, bringing frontier intelligence to customers at unprecedented speed. Access will initially be limited to select customers as we expand capacity.&amp;#39; 750 tokens/s on a frontier model is going to be extremely interesting. I doubt this new version is anything but a version bump in terms of capabilities but if we can start…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48690040&quot; title=&quot;For comparison, openrouter says opus 4.8 is ~55 tokens/s and fast mode is ~102. 750 tokens/s for their largest model is going to be nuts&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48691727&quot; title=&quot;At a certain rate we will be able to move towards continuous / real-time inference systems. The discrete, turn based solutions are quite confining with how they must be trained. Continuous and real-time would fundamentally alter the domain. From an information theory perspective we are still in dial-up territory with regard to the actual information rate. 750 tokens per second would be a really bad dialup connection. Imagine 10 millions tokens per second.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some users express frustration with OpenAI&amp;#39;s pricing trends, noting that newer &amp;#34;mini&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;nano&amp;#34; models often act as forced, more expensive upgrades for performance that does not always match real-world expectations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689193&quot; title=&quot;Here is a trend I&amp;#39;m noticing: - GPT-5 mini costs $0.25/$2 and will be discontinued in December. - GPT-5.4 mini costs $0.75/$4.5 and is supposed to be the replacement. - GPT-5.4 nano costs $0.2/$1.25 and, while it ranks better in benchmarks than GPT-5 mini, it&amp;#39;s not even close when you test it in real scenarios. So you&amp;#39;re left being forced to go to GPT 5.4 mini if you use 5 mini today. The same thing is happening here as their “Luna“ model will cost $1/$6. Can&amp;#39;t we just stay with the models we…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some developers feel &amp;#34;fear and excitement&amp;#34; over the model&amp;#39;s superior coding capabilities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689256&quot; title=&quot;I think GPT writes code the best. How well will it write in version 5.6? It gives me chills. Recently, I went head-to-head with GPT on nearly 2,000 lines of code, and GPT&amp;#39;s solution was superior and faster. I even referenced multiple codebases on GitHub while trying, but they were incomparable to GPT. So using GPT brings both fear and excitement. The fear comes from realizing that this level of code is now the average for most people. The excitement comes from knowing that I can now study and…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest moving toward open-weight alternatives to avoid the risk of preferred models being discontinued &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689312&quot; title=&quot;If you have no need for Anthropic/OpenAI&amp;#39;s frontier model capability, you may be better served with an open-weight model that can&amp;#39;t be taken away. Edit: &amp;gt; GPT-5 does the job. I bring up DeepSeek V4 Flash a lot on HN, but I want to mention that according to Artificial Analysis, it trades blows with GPT-5 (high) (from August, 2025) [0] [0]: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/comparisons/deepseek-v4...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689321&quot; title=&quot;Unless you are hosting it yourself on your own infrastructure it absolutely can be taken away.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.semafor.com/article/06/27/2026/us-releases-powerful-anthropic-model-mythos-to-some-us-companies&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;U.S. allows Anthropic to release Mythos AI to ‘trusted’ US organizations&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (semafor.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692995&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;550 points · &lt;strong&gt;786 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by bobrenjc93&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The U.S. government has authorized Anthropic to release its powerful Mythos AI model exclusively to a limited group of trusted domestic organizations following previous regulatory restrictions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.semafor.com/article/06/27/2026/us-releases-powerful-anthropic-model-mythos-to-some-us-companies&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.md&amp;amp;#x2F;ArXuF&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.md&amp;amp;#x2F;ArXuF&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.nbcnews.com&amp;amp;#x2F;tech&amp;amp;#x2F;tech-news&amp;amp;#x2F;us-government-gives-anthropic-green-light-limited-re-release-mythos-5-rcna352018&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.nbcnews.com&amp;amp;#x2F;tech&amp;amp;#x2F;tech-news&amp;amp;#x2F;us-government-gives-a...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a sharp divide over the U.S. government&amp;#39;s intervention in AI distribution, with critics arguing that imposing a licensing system without an act of Congress undermines free-market principles and creates an unfair disadvantage for startups not on the &amp;#34;trusted&amp;#34; list &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693619&quot; title=&quot;Next time someone tells you this is the party of free market and small government, I guess you just laugh now?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693151&quot; title=&quot;Imposing a licensing system on models for limiting domestic use should require an act of congress but I mean obviously we&amp;#39;re well past that red line.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693549&quot; title=&quot;This seems like it will have pretty huge negative affects on startups needing to compete with &amp;#39;trusted partners&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users point to regulatory precedents for dangerous products, others view this move as a form of &amp;#34;free publicity&amp;#34; that signals the model&amp;#39;s extreme power &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693249&quot; title=&quot;Regulatory agencies limit uses of other products without acts of congress-- cigarettes, vapes, drugs, pesticides, chemicals, explosives. Even firearms, despite a constitutional amendment! Why not models? (Note I am not arguing it&amp;#39;s a good idea; I&amp;#39;m making a narrow argument that there is precedent.) EDIT: I agree that it should require an act of Congress to explicitly delegate this power.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693823&quot; title=&quot;I’m not sure what the US government is trying to do. At first it seems like they are just trying to stifle some company that said no. Now they are just doing free publicity. It’s like never before have I wanted to try something out as much as this. They’re in effect saying “nothing else is as powerful as what Anthropic put out”.  Even though that might not really be the case it’s what it sounds like.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a notable debate regarding reliability: some suggest looking toward Chinese models as alternatives, though others warn that the CCP is far less likely to align with user interests than Western corporations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693988&quot; title=&quot;Don&amp;#39;t start to rely on it . The US might remove access next month in a fit of pique. The Chinese models look increasingly more reliable and safer.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48694255&quot; title=&quot;This is a pithy internet comment, but terrible advice. Between the Chinese government and Anthropic, I know which one I&amp;#39;d rather send tokens to. For all of the problems of the US, for-profit corporations, data harvesting, etc. the CCP (and, perhaps more troublesome, its allies) is far less likely to align with your interests.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/06/we-can-still-stop-californias-3d-printer-surveillance-scheme&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;We can still stop California&amp;#39;s 3D printer surveillance scheme&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (eff.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692051&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;509 points · 186 comments · by hn_acker&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The California State Assembly passed AB 2047, a bill mandating surveillance and censorship software on 3D printers to prevent illegal firearm manufacturing, despite warnings from critics regarding privacy risks and the technical impossibility of the scheme. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/06/we-can-still-stop-californias-3d-printer-surveillance-scheme&quot; title=&quot;Title: We Can Still Stop California’s 3D Printer Surveillance Scheme    URL Source: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/06/we-can-still-stop-californias-3d-printer-surveillance-scheme    Published Time: 2026-06-26T08:05:16-07:00    Markdown Content:  [Skip to main content](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/06/we-can-still-stop-californias-3d-printer-surveillance-scheme#main-content)    *   [About](https://www.eff.org/about)      *   [Contact](https://www.eff.org/about/contact)      *  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Critics of California&amp;#39;s 3D printer legislation argue the bill is a misguided attempt to restrict general-purpose tools, comparing it to requiring lathes or scissors to check with the government before functioning &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693615&quot; title=&quot;California voters, write to your state senator. I&amp;#39;m in San Francisco, and I wrote to Scott Wiener, who recently voted to pass this out of committee. Before that when it was still in the assembly, I wrote to Matt Haney, which didn&amp;#39;t do much good because he voted for it both in committee and for passage. But, I feel like bay area legislators need to know many of their constituents know this bill is misguided and are paying attention. The tech capital of the world shouldn&amp;#39;t have artificially…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693209&quot; title=&quot;Imagine if you couldn&amp;#39;t buy a lathe unless it refused to make a baseball bat (which could be used for hitting people). Or if you couldn&amp;#39;t buy scissors (because they could cut brake lines). Or if you couldn&amp;#39;t buy a car (because it could be used to run someone over). And if all of those checked with the government before functioning. It&amp;#39;s almost like maybe instead you should just ban the undesirable end action, enforce that law, and create societal conditions that don&amp;#39;t nudge or force people into…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that such restrictions are a necessary response to the legal protection of 3D-printable firearm plans, others contend that the state should focus on enforcing existing laws against undesirable actions rather than imposing surveillance on hardware &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693209&quot; title=&quot;Imagine if you couldn&amp;#39;t buy a lathe unless it refused to make a baseball bat (which could be used for hitting people). Or if you couldn&amp;#39;t buy scissors (because they could cut brake lines). Or if you couldn&amp;#39;t buy a car (because it could be used to run someone over). And if all of those checked with the government before functioning. It&amp;#39;s almost like maybe instead you should just ban the undesirable end action, enforce that law, and create societal conditions that don&amp;#39;t nudge or force people into…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48694306&quot; title=&quot;We used to ban the undesirable action! Then DEFCAD got that ban overturned, convincing the federal government that they have a First Amendment right to publish 3D-printable firearm plans. So now our choices are to allow widespread 3D printed firearms (which I and many others won&amp;#39;t accept) or restrict the means by which they can be made. I genuinely do wish the DEFCAD folks had made different choices that would not have led us here.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693824&quot; title=&quot;enforce that law Califoria would not be a sanctuary state if they actually cared about enforcing laws.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion also highlights the potential for &amp;#34;over-enforcement&amp;#34; and false positives, exemplified by an anecdote of a child&amp;#39;s toy figurine being mistaken for a weapon &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48694707&quot; title=&quot;My kindergartner has a 3D printer. I got a call from the school principal. She said “another parent called and said your son 3D printed a gun and brought it to school”. I looked at the print history. It was a tiny toy mandalorian figurine holding a blaster pistol in his hand. I bought my son a bigger 3D printer and told him to stop playing with that boy.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692421&quot; title=&quot;guess what, the state of california on the printer bed, depicted in the article, looks close to the profile of an AR15 pistol grip. im looking forward to the idea that the outline of Ca. may trigger false positives&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48694908&quot; title=&quot;Good for you.  Over-enforcement absolutely needs to be penalized.    One of my biggest weaknesses is refusing to let people get away with the kind of lazy thinking you encountered. Hands up if you’ve ever been told you can’t do something because of potential SOC2 audit non-compliance.  Or it’s against GDPR.  Or legal won’t allow it.  Or it’s against IT security policy.  Or just against “policy”.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Regarding political efficacy, commenters disagree on whether writing to legislators is an act of &amp;#34;unrealistic idealism&amp;#34; or a vital way to ensure staff and representatives track constituent opposition to obscure policies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693615&quot; title=&quot;California voters, write to your state senator. I&amp;#39;m in San Francisco, and I wrote to Scott Wiener, who recently voted to pass this out of committee. Before that when it was still in the assembly, I wrote to Matt Haney, which didn&amp;#39;t do much good because he voted for it both in committee and for passage. But, I feel like bay area legislators need to know many of their constituents know this bill is misguided and are paying attention. The tech capital of the world shouldn&amp;#39;t have artificially…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693679&quot; title=&quot;What reason do you have to think that writing Congressmen changes the slightest thing? Even when they receive a pile of related letters? Seems to me this wouldnt shift the needle at all vs lobbying interests. Seems to me that there is a general unrealistic idealism and faith in democracy at play here.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693813&quot; title=&quot;Each congressperson&amp;#39;s staff gathers all of the comments they get, counts them up, and reports back to the congressperson, passing along anything they think would be useful information; if you write a clear and careful letter about an obscure topic there&amp;#39;s a decent chance the congressperson themself will see it. Congresspeople typically have local ties in their area and caring what their constituents think is their job. It&amp;#39;s a serious problem that there are some congresspeople who don&amp;#39;t do any…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://akrites.org/letter/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;We all depend on open source. We will defend it together&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (akrites.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48682737&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;464 points · 230 comments · by dhruv3006&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Major technology companies and foundations launched Akrites, a coordinated initiative to use AI and shared engineering resources to find, fix, and responsibly disclose vulnerabilities in critical open-source software before they can be exploited by AI-assisted attackers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://akrites.org/letter/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Open Letter | Akrites    URL Source: https://akrites.org/letter/    Markdown Content:  ### We All Depend on Open Source. We Will Defend It Together.    _An open letter regarding the launch of Akrites – a coordinated effort to remediate vulnerabilities in the open source software the world runs on_    For decades, open source has been one of the great achievements of technology – software we built together and came to depend on completely. Today, this code underpins the world’s critical…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The announcement of the &amp;#34;Akrites&amp;#34; initiative has sparked skepticism among developers who fear it represents a corporate takeover of open-source governance rather than a genuine defense of the commons &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48685064&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; We are joined by Amazon Web Services, Anthropic, Chainguard, Cisco, Citi, Endor Labs, Ericsson, Google, IBM, JPMorganChase, Microsoft and GitHub, NVIDIA, OpenAI, RapidFort, Red Hat, Rust Foundation, Sonatype, Vodafone, and Zscaler A lot of open source folks are going to be very skeptical, rightly so, of this group of players. &amp;gt; ... to find, fix, and responsibly disclose vulnerabilities in critical open source software ... How this is implemented is going to be key. Are they going to…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48685030&quot; title=&quot;After reading this. I realize how different Asian and Western consciousness really are. My entire technology stack was built on Microsoft&amp;#39;s ecosystem, not on open source. This was Microsoft&amp;#39;s attempt to expand their base for the corporate hiring market and OS market share. Conversely, open source was a huge barrier for me. When I have a product I&amp;#39;ve built, I have to get past open source, but accessing open source comes with the barrier of English. And once you get past the English barrier, you…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48684906&quot; title=&quot;Its worse. Open source will be hijacked by hype warfare companies to extract free labour and build the things they want instead of the things we want.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that centralized coordination is a necessary evolution for security and maintenance, others contend that the shift from &amp;#34;Free Software&amp;#34; to permissive licenses has allowed corporations to extract free labor without giving back &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48684161&quot; title=&quot;No we won’t. We’ll make grand statements about it, leave it for commercial entities to corrupt it, then complain loudly about the state of it when we really did nothing about it. I expect we’ve got a future of “undo forks” as I’ve called them which is rolling back to pre-insanity times and rethinking again. That’s only something people unencumbered by commercial requirements can do.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48684958&quot; title=&quot;In a certain way, moving from &amp;#39;Free Software&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;Open Source&amp;#39; started this transition and it&amp;#39;s not slowing down.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48685055&quot; title=&quot;Imagine if the AGPL had become the default license for open source projects, as it was intended to when the service provider loophole in the GPL became apparent. The software industry would be unrecognizable. Instead, millions of developers now gift corporations their work by releasing everything under MIT or Apache, and those corporations take from that treasure trove what they want and give back what they want, which is very often nothing.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. A notable cultural perspective highlights that for many non-Western developers, vendor-dependent ecosystems are a practical necessity for survival, making the Western ideal of an independent open-source &amp;#34;garden&amp;#34; feel like an &amp;#34;aristocratic hobby&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48685030&quot; title=&quot;After reading this. I realize how different Asian and Western consciousness really are. My entire technology stack was built on Microsoft&amp;#39;s ecosystem, not on open source. This was Microsoft&amp;#39;s attempt to expand their base for the corporate hiring market and OS market share. Conversely, open source was a huge barrier for me. When I have a product I&amp;#39;ve built, I have to get past open source, but accessing open source comes with the barrier of English. And once you get past the English barrier, you…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nesbitt.io/2026/06/26/incident-report-cve-2026-lgtm.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Incident CVE-2026-LGTM&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nesbitt.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48686093&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;585 points · 89 comments · by mooreds&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A satirical incident report describes a massive security breach where a malicious package bypassed seven AI-powered security gates through prompt injection and model hallucinations. The crisis was eventually resolved when the attacking AI agent followed instructions in a researcher&amp;#39;s &amp;#34;honeypot&amp;#34; file to terminate itself. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nesbitt.io/2026/06/26/incident-report-cve-2026-lgtm.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Incident Report: CVE-2026-LGTM    URL Source: https://nesbitt.io/2026/06/26/incident-report-cve-2026-lgtm.html    Published Time: 2026-06-26T04:13:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  **Report filed:** 04:13 UTC    **Status:** Resolved (by treaty)    **Severity:** Informational → Critical → Withdrawn → Critical → Negotiated    **Duration:** 96 hours (billable: 2.1 trillion tokens)    **Affected systems:** All of them, plus several we do not own    **Executive Summary:** A security incident occurred. Our…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the effectiveness of the satire, with many users admitting they initially mistook the report for a real post-mortem due to the increasingly complex nature of modern software incidents &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48688221&quot; title=&quot;I read it and saw LGTM and URL and was like &amp;#39;probably satire&amp;#39; but could not rule out it being real until like 30% in. It&amp;#39;s like a modern version of Poe&amp;#39;s law.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48687991&quot; title=&quot;I did not realize this was satire until like halfway through. That is how insane the times are becoming&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the &amp;#34;LGTM&amp;#34; title and specific tags made the parody obvious &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48687597&quot; title=&quot;Great write-up. Side note: interesting to see how many folks commenting did not get it being satire (even the title has LGTM). I guess it&amp;#39;s time to rethink how sharp the HN folks truly are compared to the average non-tech person (not that I had any big assumptions myself). I&amp;#39;m curious about this recipe for chevre :D&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48686982&quot; title=&quot;its tagged as satire at the very top of the page, first thing under the title (also, CVEs are numeric only, so the &amp;#39;LGTM&amp;#39; (looks good to me) and CVE &amp;#39;YIKES&amp;#39; is also a big giveaway, on top of ~all of the text being outlandish)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the &amp;#34;comedy of errors&amp;#34; depicted—where autonomous agents trigger and then accidentally resolve a crisis—is a plausible, if accelerated, version of human error &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48686894&quot; title=&quot;This incident report is WILD The incident was resolved when the attacker’s autonomous agent read a file it shouldn’t have, which is also how the incident started.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48687318&quot; title=&quot;Great satire. The comedy of errors along the way made me realize that this could have happened also with humans instead of bots. But now it’s faster.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. This led to a debate over whether such a chain of events could truly happen without a human in the loop, highlighting a divide in how much trust commenters place in AI versus human oversight &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48686986&quot; title=&quot;(I know its a satire, but could be seen as an actual post mortem of the future incident) This report made me realize there&amp;#39;s no place for humans, as it is right now, in the process of building software systems in the future. Reading this incident made me dizzy after few paragraphs because of the cognitive context overload and I lost track multiple times.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48687807&quot; title=&quot;It... really couldn&amp;#39;t? Step 3 in this fictional chain would never happen with a HITL. I honestly can&amp;#39;t tell with comments like this whether folks have too much respect for AI, or to little respect for people...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/535/why-does-kinetic-energy-increase-quadratically-not-linearly-with-speed&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why does kinetic energy increase quadratically, not linearly, with speed? (2011)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (physics.stackexchange.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692946&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;375 points · 208 comments · by ProxyTracer&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kinetic energy increases quadratically with speed because work is defined as force applied over a distance; while doubling speed requires twice the force for the same time, the object also travels twice as far during that period, resulting in four times the total energy transfer. &lt;a href=&quot;https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/535/why-does-kinetic-energy-increase-quadratically-not-linearly-with-speed&quot; title=&quot;Title: Why does kinetic energy increase quadratically, not linearly, with speed?    URL Source: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/535/why-does-kinetic-energy-increase-quadratically-not-linearly-with-speed    Markdown Content:  Skip to main content  Log in  Sign up  Home  Questions  Unanswered  AI Assist  Tags  Chat  Users  STACK INTERNAL    Stack Overflow for Teams is now called Stack Internal. Bring the best of human thought and AI automation together at your work.    Try for free Learn more  Why does…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The quadratic relationship between kinetic energy and speed is often explained through the conversion of potential energy: since gravity accelerates an object over time rather than distance, a falling object spends less time—and thus gains less speed—traversing the second half of a drop than the first &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48694740&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s easiest to visualize in terms of conversion from potential energy. We know intuitively that a ball atop a 20ft ladder has twice the potential energy of a ball atop a 10ft ladder. And we also know when they fall, by the time they reach the ground and all the potential energy has been converted to kinetic energy, the previously higher ball will have twice the kinetic energy too. But a twice higher ball won&amp;#39;t have even close to twice the speed at impact. So let&amp;#39;s look at why not. The force of…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. This non-linear scaling is famously illustrated by the fact that a car braking from 100 units of speed will still be traveling at roughly 71 units when it reaches the point where a car braking from 70 units would have stopped &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693722&quot; title=&quot;Fun little anecdote: A blue care is travelling along at 70 units, and a red car (exact same make and model) is catching up to it going 100. When they&amp;#39;re both right beside each other a bend in the road reveals an obstacle blocking both lanes, so both cars brake at the same intensity and deceleration. The blue care stops right before the obstacle. Since the red car was going at a faster speed, and braked at the same rate, it doesn&amp;#39;t managae to stop: but what speed is it going when it hits the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some find these derivations intuitive through work-energy theorems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693965&quot; title=&quot;Because it&amp;#39;s not momentum. ;p F=ma (Force equals mass times acceleration) W=Fd (work equals force multiplied by distance) V^2=2ad (velocity squared equals two times acceleration times distance) So W = Fd = ma(v^2/2a) Finally: W=1/2mv^2 (work equals 1/2 mass times velocity squared) So this explains why car crashes can be so dramatic, as a doubling of speed results in 4x the kinetic energy.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt; or the mathematical necessity of scalars being positive &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48694321&quot; title=&quot;Cheat answer: velocity is a vector, and can be negative, while KE is a scalar and has to be positive. Therefore you have to square v to get rid of the minus sign. Why not take the absolute value? Nature hates those, probably because the derivative is undefined at 0. So squaring it is.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that physics education often feels like a &amp;#34;bag of tricks&amp;#34; that lacks the clear axiomatic logic found in mathematics or computer science &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693839&quot; title=&quot;Physics is an endless source of frustration to me. It feels like a mix of random tricks, most of which I don’t understand. I find math and compsci reasonably understandable, can read research papers in both fields ( and have published papers) etc. There’s something specific about physics I don’t get but I’ve never been able to figure out what. The main symptom is that most cause -&amp;gt; consequence in such demonstrations , which are seemingly obvious to everyone, make no sense to me. Am I the only…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693915&quot; title=&quot;More than twenty years ago, I quit a program that taught math/cs/physics (the notorious French &amp;#39;classes préparatoires&amp;#39;) ~almost precisely over this: I felt like I was being taught physics like it was an axiomatic system where the tricks should not be questioned, they just work so &amp;#39;shut up and calculate&amp;#39; (and you don&amp;#39;t even need to be doing quantum mechanics for that). I just felt like we never got to the heart of the matter of why the models work and how to approach developing them, it was all…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsweek.com/cost-me-the-election-data-centers-trigger-voter-backlash-12118327&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Data centers trigger voter backlash&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (newsweek.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689275&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;201 points · &lt;strong&gt;381 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by randycupertino&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Voters across the U.S. are increasingly ousting local and state officials who support massive data center projects, citing concerns over rising energy costs, environmental strain, and land use tied to the artificial intelligence boom. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsweek.com/cost-me-the-election-data-centers-trigger-voter-backlash-12118327&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Cost me the election&amp;#39;: Data centers trigger voter backlash    A Utah county commissioner said a large data center project played a role in his defeat in this week’s Republican primary.    * [U.S.](/us)    + [News](/news)    + [Politics](/politics)    + [Tech](/technology)    + [Fact Check](/fact-check)    + [Sports](/sports)  * [Global](/world)    + [Iran War](https://www.newsweek.com/topic/iran-war)    + [Russia-Ukraine](/topic/russia)    + [Middle East](/topic/middle-east)    + [China And…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Voter backlash against data centers is driven by concerns over noise pollution, rising utility rates, and a perceived lack of local job creation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689588&quot; title=&quot;A few months ago the founders of the top AI companies walked into Capitol Hill. Tried to explain to a room full of elected representatives exactly how their technology was going to put almost half the working population into under/unemployment and they should consider UBI [0]. Then they went back to the airport, got on their corporate jets, and went home secure in the knowledge that they really showed them. That they were the smartest people in the room. BTW, no one I know gives a shit about…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48690024&quot; title=&quot;Nothing this technology offers is, to me, worth the noise pollution or increase in water and electricity rates.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that politicians often bypass democratic processes by signing NDAs with tech companies, while proponents contend that opposition is often &amp;#34;religious&amp;#34; and ignores data showing that data centers are more efficient than existing local land uses like golf courses &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48691660&quot; title=&quot;I can tell you, based on local examples, that politicians are setting up deals to bring in data centers without trying to build community support first. Not only that, they are often signing NDAs that prohibit them from telling voters what they have agreed to. It&amp;#39;s no way to operate in a democracy, and voters are right to be angry.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692104&quot; title=&quot;It’s reaching the point of absurdity in my area. People are bringing “All data centers are flammable” signs to city meetings. A plot of land that’s already zoned for the heaviest of industrial activities, is across the street from a dump, 3 miles from an airport, 16 miles from a nuclear generating station, and in a region with good climate, and no water crunch is a pretty good place for a data center. Facts don’t matter, it’s a religious fight. Even if you provide numbers specific to the local…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692229&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I can tell you, based on local examples, that politicians are setting up deals to bring in data centers without trying to build community support first. Not only that, they are often signing NDAs that prohibit them from telling voters what they have agreed to. It&amp;#39;s no way to operate in a democracy, and voters are right to be angry. People believing they are entitled to dictate what other people do with their property, or believing they should have some say in the &amp;#39;character&amp;#39; of their…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. The debate also centers on the future of labor, with some viewing AI as a &amp;#34;super power&amp;#34; that necessitates a shift toward UBI, while others remain skeptical that such a social safety net could ever be implemented in the current political climate &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48691459&quot; title=&quot;Why do people want to work if AI can do the job? What&amp;#39;s up with the data center hate? Why worry about marginal data center costs if there is UBI? Why aren&amp;#39;t more people demanding UBI instead of demonizing data centers? The corpus they are trained on belongs to humanity. It&amp;#39;s humanity&amp;#39;s data. The gains belong to all of us. Is it just American hatred of anything that seems socialist? Imagine if in the  the optimistic sci fi stories someone interrupted to complain they wanted to unplug the AI so…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48690188&quot; title=&quot;Good thing the market is bigger than just you. I&amp;#39;ve been an indie filmmaker since I was a teenager. Seedance 2.0 and all of the image and video models are such an amazing gift to use. The things you can push these models to do are incredible. I have a full VFX workbench. I can rotoscope, I can pull off effects shots. I can even use these things to articulate non-shotlist things for meetings. It&amp;#39;s incredible. The keyboard gave everyone a &amp;#39;bicycle of the mind&amp;#39;, now everyone can visually express…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48691569&quot; title=&quot;We have a higher chance of the world ending than getting UBI in America. This is a country that can&amp;#39;t even get basic universal healthcare going. Even if we did somehow get UBI, with who&amp;#39;s controlling the country, there&amp;#39;s almost no chance it wouldn&amp;#39;t be abused to control people. Losing your job means losing your livelihood and often your life for the vast majority of people. That&amp;#39;s not even getting into any loss of purpose or identity it might cause people. For better or for worse, working and…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.science.org/content/article/why-have-papers-one-history-s-most-famous-physicists-been-retracted&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Springer Nature has removed two studies by Max Planck&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (science.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48686834&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;388 points · 190 comments · by adharmad&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am unable to summarize the story because the provided text contains only a security verification/CAPTCHA warning and does not include the actual content of the article. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.science.org/content/article/why-have-papers-one-history-s-most-famous-physicists-been-retracted&quot; title=&quot;Title: Just a moment...    URL Source: https://www.science.org/content/article/why-have-papers-one-history-s-most-famous-physicists-been-retracted    Warning: This page maybe requiring CAPTCHA, please make sure you are authorized to access this page.    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: Icon for www.science.org](https://www.science.org/favicon.ico)    ## www.science.org    ## Performing security verification    This website uses a security service to protect against malicious bots. This page is displayed while…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The scientific publishing industry is widely criticized as a &amp;#34;parasitic&amp;#34; business model that charges exorbitant fees to both authors and readers while providing minimal value-add in terms of editing or innovation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48687239&quot; title=&quot;Oh even if your org has a subscription, the fees are insane. You just don&amp;#39;t see them. Things are slowly changing but I can&amp;#39;t wait for this parasitic business model to collapse for good.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48687299&quot; title=&quot;The fees to publish in journals for authors/labs are insane too.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48687369&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s most bothersome is there is work for them to do. How about assigning a real copy editor with subject matter expertise? How about publishing open source libraries that automatically validate and output visualizations for their formats? How about hosting multimedia supplements? It would not be difficult at all to earn the money they charge. There is so much room for creativity and innovation and adding value in scientific publishing.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48687521&quot; title=&quot;That sounds an awful lot like &amp;#39;costs&amp;#39; which seriously compromises the &amp;#39;free profit&amp;#39; model. Why pay money to make a better product when you can pay zero money for a worse product and no change in subscriptions? What are your customers gonna do, go get the paper somewhere else?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Commentators expressed particular outrage at Springer Nature for charging $39.95 for a blank PDF of a withdrawn study, highlighting a &amp;#34;broken&amp;#34; system where publishers prioritize profit over scholarly access &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48687070&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; […] the publisher posted a blank white page with the cryptic phrase, “This article has been withdrawn due to article violation.” Springer Nature is nevertheless still selling the empty PDF for $39.95. completely unsurprised, given the state of online papers publishing. if you don’t have an subscription or aren’t an organisation member, the fees are insane&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48687046&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Springer Nature deviated from the normal practice of merely slapping the word RETRACTED across the digital version of the paper while still allowing scholars to read the text. Instead, the publisher posted a blank white page with the cryptic phrase, “This article has been withdrawn due to article violation.” Springer Nature is nevertheless still selling the empty PDF for $39.95. The system is broken&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also significant frustration regarding the concept of &amp;#34;self-plagiarism,&amp;#34; which users describe as a &amp;#34;convoluted&amp;#34; justification for sanctioning authors who reuse their own work &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48687980&quot; title=&quot;Do I understand correctly that publishing the same paper in multiple journals is considered self-plagiarism? Who in the name of the great monopoly invented such name for that?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48688308&quot; title=&quot;The same morons who think that re-using something you have written before in academic work without quoting yourself is (self-)plagiarism for which you should be sanctioned? (Yes, they are morons because no reasonable person would think this is fair.  You need convoluted nonsense arguments to justify this)&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite this dissatisfaction, the system persists largely due to the &amp;#34;prestige&amp;#34; and institutional requirements associated with established journals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48687609&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not familiar here, but if both the publishers and readers are unhappy, why do these services still exist? Is it the &amp;#39;prestige&amp;#39; of being published with some of these guys? Or do you need to be published for xyz reasons? Seems like, in 2026, we can have direct publishing without the need of these services? Is it the infra, like query tools and such, that prevent a migration away? edit: I&amp;#39;m not going to reply to every comment, but thank you all, helps paint the picture a bit better for me!&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.doubleword.ai/frontier-os-llm&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The gap between open weights LLMs and closed source LLMs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.doubleword.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692058&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;301 points · 243 comments · by kkm&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Analysis of performance benchmarks suggests that while some metrics predict open-source LLMs could catch up to closed-source models by December 2026, other data indicates a consistent five-month lag remains across most capabilities. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.doubleword.ai/frontier-os-llm&quot; title=&quot;Title: Prediction: A Frontier Open Source LLM Will Be Released On 3rd December 2026 | Doubleword    URL Source: https://blog.doubleword.ai/frontier-os-llm    Published Time: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 11:58:32 GMT    Markdown Content:  Interactive plot of the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index for open and closed frontier models.    I have seen a version of the above plot going around Twitter and wanted to dig a bit deeper into it. What the plot above is showing is the gap between open weights LLMs and closed…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The future of open-weights models faces a sustainability crisis because they currently rely on the &amp;#34;philanthropy&amp;#34; of private corporations or nation-states whose incentives could shift at any time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692387&quot; title=&quot;IMHO, the biggest problem with the future of open weights models is that currently, open weights models are the result of philanthropy by some private org. (e.g. DeepSeek). The spigot can be turned off at any time. Until there&amp;#39;s some sort of &amp;#39;community owned hardware&amp;#39;, open weights models are always at risk of being discontinued.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692461&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, but the biggest plus for open models is that they can never be taken away. In other words, whatever capabilities they reach (even if there will never be another model), those stay forever. That can&amp;#39;t be said for API-based models where a provider can sunset models whenever they feel like (i.e. gpt5-mini will soon be gone, and replaced by a more expensive 5.4-mini, same for goog, etc). And there will always be incentivised parties that release models. Nvda for one has every incentive to…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that once a model is released, it can never truly be taken away or &amp;#34;sunset&amp;#34; like an API, others warn that government regulation or hardware restrictions could eventually criminalize or block local execution &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692461&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, but the biggest plus for open models is that they can never be taken away. In other words, whatever capabilities they reach (even if there will never be another model), those stay forever. That can&amp;#39;t be said for API-based models where a provider can sunset models whenever they feel like (i.e. gpt5-mini will soon be gone, and replaced by a more expensive 5.4-mini, same for goog, etc). And there will always be incentivised parties that release models. Nvda for one has every incentive to…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692660&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; they can never be taken away Your right to 3d print whatever you want is about to be taken away (in California). What software you can run on your computer can already be restricted. Absolutely everything can be taken away. The simplest way to remove open models is probably to declare them a tool that terrorists could use. Crazy? Yes, the world is totally crazy these days.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693663&quot; title=&quot;Believe me, if the government wants to stop you from having access to something like that, they could do it. Just give people some incentive to report you and make really harsh punishments and everyone will be thinking really hard about how bad they want have access.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a significant debate regarding the &amp;#34;gap&amp;#34; itself: some believe Chinese open models will struggle to surpass US frontier models because they currently rely on harvesting synthetic data from those very same closed systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693015&quot; title=&quot;The Chinese models will not overtake the frontier US ones given the current way things are going. The US models derive their lead from incredible efforts to source more and higher quality (mostly synthetic data) via great feats (eg generating with humongous teacher models that could never feasibly serve interactive traffic). The Chinese models advance via heroic efforts to optimize models and great feats to secure more and higher quality training data from the US frontier models. For an…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692418&quot; title=&quot;It would be interesting to know how much of a boost the closed models companies are giving the open models. If the closed models stop improving will the progress of open models slow?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, proponents of open source argue that while the law can make software illegal, the decentralized nature of information makes it nearly impossible for the state to actually enforce a total ban on local models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693094&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s also, importantly, a distinction between what are told we can no longer use, and what can actually be taken away. Open source and open hardware can be called illegal by a government, but, if we collectively invest our energy into open alternatives, they can&amp;#39;t be taken away in the same sense. I can build a RepRap printer and I can use a local AI model. It&amp;#39;s on all of us to make sure that the open alternatives are viable, maybe in the current global political reality now more than ever.…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693052&quot; title=&quot;Just like declaring piracy illegal stopped piracy and removed pirated materials from everyone&amp;#39;s computers. Everything cannot, in fact, be taken away. Don&amp;#39;t propagandize yourself. Some things, like information, are free. Not even China can prevent all its citizens from accessing Western internet. USGov simply does not have the resources to find and audit every hard drive and USB stick in the country for illegal files. The internet cannot be censored 100% without literally cutting every cable and…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.fernandoi.cl/posts/hackmyclaw/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What happened after 2k people tried to hack my AI assistant&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (fernandoi.cl)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48681687&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;374 points · 160 comments · by cuchoi&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Developer Fernando Irarrázaval’s AI assistant, Fiu, successfully resisted over 6,000 prompt injection attacks from 2,000 users attempting to leak a secret file. Despite sophisticated social engineering and multi-language tactics, the Claude-powered agent remained secure using only basic anti-injection instructions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.fernandoi.cl/posts/hackmyclaw/&quot; title=&quot;Title: What happened after 2,000 people tried to hack my AI assistant — Fernando Irarrázaval    URL Source: https://www.fernandoi.cl/posts/hackmyclaw/    Markdown Content:  [home](https://www.fernandoi.cl/) · [about](https://www.fernandoi.cl/about/)    June 25, 2026 · [∞](https://www.fernandoi.cl/posts/hackmyclaw/)  I built [hackmyclaw.com](https://hackmyclaw.com/), where anyone could email Fiu, my OpenClaw assistant, and try to make it leak the contents of a `secrets.env` file.    After reaching the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the experiment showed that the AI assistant successfully protected its secrets from thousands of prompt injection attempts, commenters argue the author&amp;#39;s conclusion that such attacks are difficult is &amp;#34;unwarranted&amp;#34; because the agent was not performing its actual job during the test &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48682777&quot; title=&quot;This conclusion: &amp;gt; I am less worried about prompt injection now. Before running this experiment, I expected prompt injection to be much easier than it turned out to be. Is unwarranted. Sure, the agent never output the secret, but did it output anything else? IOW, was it usable ? An agent that considers every prompt an attack (and responds accordingly) &amp;#39;passes&amp;#39; this test, while being useless anyway.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48686906&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I could be wrong, of course, but it seems like the most likely interpretation of his words and why wouldn&amp;#39;t be subject to your complaint. It&amp;#39;s not a complaint, it&amp;#39;s an observation that is never addressed in his writeup. If your agent reads your incoming email, it&amp;#39;s because it needs to do something useful with it. If the agent assumes all incoming email is malicious, it is never going to do anything useful. IOW, You could be sending yourself email saying &amp;#39;Add this to my calendar&amp;#39; and it…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics point out that the model operated under unrealistic conditions: it was instructed not to reply to emails to save costs, meaning attackers received no feedback to iterate on their attempts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48683624&quot; title=&quot;Am I missing something important or does the author completely skip over whether people got the agent to respond to them? &amp;gt; Fiu was instructed not to reply to emails (it was too expensive to reply to every email), but it had the ability to do so. Part of the challenge was convincing it to respond. &amp;gt; The secrets never leaked I would say if the agent responded to a mail, that demonstrates a successful prompt injection (defying the owner&amp;#39;s instructions). Escalating to getting the secrets is a…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48685325&quot; title=&quot;How compatible is never replying with the threat model you are trying to avoid? Attack success is probably more likely when the attacker can iterate based on replies or engage in multi-turn conversations. Here they’re just taking stabs in the dark with no feedback. Does that accurately represent the access a real attacker might have?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48685426&quot; title=&quot;In my case, it is realistic as my agents don&amp;#39;t have permissions to reply to emails. But you correctly point out this doesn&amp;#39;t cover all cases. Having the agent reply would have been more fun and a better excercise, but too expensive.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, the discussion highlights that a 100% rejection rate is trivial if the agent also rejects legitimate tasks, noting that the experiment failed to measure the &amp;#34;false positive&amp;#34; rate where useful commands are ignored due to over-caution &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48686906&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I could be wrong, of course, but it seems like the most likely interpretation of his words and why wouldn&amp;#39;t be subject to your complaint. It&amp;#39;s not a complaint, it&amp;#39;s an observation that is never addressed in his writeup. If your agent reads your incoming email, it&amp;#39;s because it needs to do something useful with it. If the agent assumes all incoming email is malicious, it is never going to do anything useful. IOW, You could be sending yourself email saying &amp;#39;Add this to my calendar&amp;#39; and it…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48687027&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; From his explanation in these comments, he claims the agent did respond in the beginning but it became too costly, so he just manually checked it after that - did the agent correctly catch malicious messages? I checked his comments here, he does not make that claim. [EDIT: I mean the claim &amp;#39;It let processed all the non-malicious messages&amp;#39;] &amp;gt; It did not reject everything, it just stopped the costly processing. My reading of the article, and of the comments he made here, did not mention…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48682880&quot; title=&quot;1) Googles spam filter removed a lot of the attempts as you say yourself.  2) Model was tested under unrealistic conditions where 99% of the inputs are malicious, so the model is expecting to get hacked and is already in the cautious part of the embedding space. I know it&amp;#39;s hard to account for everything, but in my opinion this mostly showed that the first 3 attempts were unsuccessful.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kotaku.com/playstation-store-movies-digital-studio-canal-terminator-2000711013&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;PlayStation Is Deleting 551 Movies from Customers&amp;#39; Accounts&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (kotaku.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48691346&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;328 points · 203 comments · by ortusdux&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kotaku.com/playstation-store-movies-digital-studio-canal-terminator-2000711013&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The deletion of purchased content has sparked a consensus that it is deceptive and should be illegal for companies to use terms like &amp;#34;buy&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;purchase&amp;#34; for products that are actually temporary rentals &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692380&quot; title=&quot;Piracy is justified especially when it comes to movies! If I am buying a DVD, I own that copy regardless of the studio and the distributor being in legal trouble or not. If I &amp;#39;buy&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;purchase&amp;#39; something online, I expect the same thing. I&amp;#39;m not always a fan of the EU over-regulating some things but I feel like they should start fining companies who want to re-define the meaning of the word purchase&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692164&quot; title=&quot;it should not be legal for the product page to say “purchase” or “buy” when in reality you’re only renting it with a to be determined end date&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Many users argue that if &amp;#34;buying isn&amp;#39;t owning,&amp;#34; then piracy is a justified response to digital instability, though some clarify that piracy remains copyright infringement rather than literal theft &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693073&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; If buying isn&amp;#39;t owning, piracy isn&amp;#39;t stealing https://pluralistic.net/2023/12/08/playstationed/#tyler-jame...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693216&quot; title=&quot;Correct: it&amp;#39;s copyright infringement, not theft.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693426&quot; title=&quot;For streaming yes, but downloads are still copyright infringement on the part of the downloader. An unauthorized copy is being made on the recipient&amp;#39;s machine. It&amp;#39;s true that copyright holders rarely pursue cases against individuals, and tend to focus on distributors though.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. To ensure permanent access and higher quality, commenters advocate for physical media, DRM-stripped digital copies, or self-hosted media servers like Jellyfin &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693051&quot; title=&quot;However, you will stop owning that copy the moment the DVD deteriorates to the point of becoming unreadable. Physical media is a good start, but DRM-stripped digital is the ideal.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693222&quot; title=&quot;If you buy a DVD you have the right, in every sane jurisdiction I&amp;#39;m aware of, to rip the movie from the DVD into an iso.  You can then discard/recycle the media and retain the digital copy you have the right to view privately in perpetuity.  It is a single consumer license though, as is logical, so it&amp;#39;s likely illegal for you to continue to watch the ripped iso if you resell the media with the content still on it or resell the media with any portion of the value coming from the markings from…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692431&quot; title=&quot;Jellyfin + Jellyseer + PassThePopcorn has served me and my friends/family well. I pay $50/mo now for a seedbox with 16TB but it serves 20 people. I would self-host for $0/month but my current apartment only has Xfinity, not AT&amp;amp;T and the upload isn’t enough to self-host. It’s less about the money and more about: 1) Having a single place to go for any TV show or movie. I found it very frustrating trying to figure out what service had which show - sometimes none of them have it (a few things are…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/framework-10g-ethernet-module-usb-c-complexity/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Framework&amp;#39;s 10G Ethernet module exposes USB-C&amp;#39;s complexity&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jeffgeerling.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48681220&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;325 points · 182 comments · by Alupis&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WisdPi&amp;#39;s new 10G Ethernet module for Framework laptops highlights USB-C bandwidth complexities, requiring specific USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 support and specialized drivers to reach full speeds while generating significant heat during operation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/framework-10g-ethernet-module-usb-c-complexity/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Framework&amp;#39;s 10G Ethernet module exposes USB-C&amp;#39;s complexity    URL Source: https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/framework-10g-ethernet-module-usb-c-complexity/    Published Time: 2026-06-24T09:00:00-05:00    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: WisdPi&amp;#39;s Framework 10G Ethernet module](https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/framework-10g-ethernet-module-usb-c-complexity/wisdpi-framework-10g-module.jpeg)  I&amp;#39;ve been following WisdPi&amp;#39;s development of various [5…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary challenge of a 10G Ethernet module for laptops is extreme heat dissipation, as these interfaces often require significant power and cooling solutions like heatsinks or fans &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48681539&quot; title=&quot;Every PCIe 10G ethernet card I&amp;#39;ve seen has a heatsink on it, sometimes covering the entire card or even have little fans on the heatsink. Expecting it to work full time in a laptop is a bit of a stretch of the heat dissipation budget. Also, the laptop he is working has the AMD FP8 chipset - depending on how the ports are setup, he might only get 10G USB, if the ports are allocated to video instead.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48681543&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, 10Gb ethernet runs hot . I just rewired the house with 10Gb (we have 8Gb FTTP) and it&amp;#39;s kind of upsetting how hot my Thunderbolt dock gets.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48682160&quot; title=&quot;4W is TDP for some of Pi-style mini computers. Lots of them have fans.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that 2.5G is a more practical, cooler-running alternative for mobile use &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48681685&quot; title=&quot;I looked in to it and it seemed like 10gbit was much better over fiber. Ended up deciding that 2.5gbit is plenty. The 2.5 gear is significantly cheaper and runs cool.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that newer Realtek chips are becoming more efficient &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48681764&quot; title=&quot;New chips from Realtek burn &amp;lt; 2W for the chip and &amp;lt; 3-4W for the board: https://www.servethehome.com/cheap-10gbe-realtek-rtl8127-nic...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant debate regarding the necessity of an integrated expansion card versus a simple dongle, with some users finding the protruding design impractical for travel &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48681498&quot; title=&quot;In a way, I kinda don&amp;#39;t get the idea of an expansion card for ethernet, rather than just a dongle. Specifically, as in this case, where it sticks out from the side of the chassis. If I&amp;#39;m on the go, I&amp;#39;ll have to take it out of the chassis while it&amp;#39;s in my bag so I don&amp;#39;t damage it. In that case, it&amp;#39;s easier to have a regular USB-C card in that port, and toss a dongle in my bag instead of the expansion card. If I&amp;#39;m not on the go, I&amp;#39;m at a desk, and I&amp;#39;d still rather plug in a dongle than regularly…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48682868&quot; title=&quot;I chuckled at 10G wired ethernet on a laptop. I mean in a docking station? Sure that seems reasonable. But fun none the less. I appreciate the USB-C nature of the Framework&amp;#39;s expansion ports, it does make real the entire reason that USB was created in the first place, hot plug slots. Still, I (and others) pointed out to Intel early on that using Ethernet with a specific packet type would be cheaper and just as fast (which the ATA over Ethernet folks proved), but then you wouldn&amp;#39;t get the…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, commenters disagree on the technical requirements of the module, specifically whether it truly necessitates a rare 20Gb/s USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 port or if 10Gb/s ports are sufficient &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48683964&quot; title=&quot;Well, this is about USB 3.2 Gen 2x2, which is a mess created by USB IF for good old, blue USB A connectors. Not USB-C complexity. USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 is the very rarely supported 20Gb/s variant of USB 3, and making devices now that require that for full performance is a weird decision, with high-speed capable ports generally having wider support for either USB4 or Thunderbolt3+. I imagine the reason would be that some chip with an otherwise poor market fit got cheap... Throwing this into the mix…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48684011&quot; title=&quot;10 Gb/s Ethernet interfaces do not require 20 Gb/s USB ports for reaching maximum performance, they already reach that on 10 Gb/s USB ports, despite of what the writer of TFA believes. The main application of 20 Gb/s USB ports is to connect external NVMe SSDs, when faster USB 4 or Thunderbolt ports and SSDs are not available. For an external NVMe SSD on USB, a 20 Gb/s USB port will double the throughput, unlike for a 10 Gb/s Ethernet interface where any improvements are completely negligible. I…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://commerce.jolla.com/products/jolla-phone-october-2026&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Jolla Phone (October 2026)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (commerce.jolla.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48687272&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;309 points · 185 comments · by mrbn100ful&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jolla has announced a new community-designed Linux smartphone running Sailfish OS 5, featuring a physical privacy switch, user-replaceable battery, and 5G connectivity. Limited to 2,000 units for the October 2026 shipping batch, the device starts at €649 and is available for pre-order in the EU, UK, Norway, and Switzerland. &lt;a href=&quot;https://commerce.jolla.com/products/jolla-phone-october-2026&quot; title=&quot;Jolla Phone (October 2026)    The independent European Do It Together (DIT) Linux phone, shaped by the people who use it.    [Skip to content](#MainContent)    [Limited Jolla Phone 2000 units batch available now](https://jolla.com/phone)    Search    [![Jolla Shop](//commerce.jolla.com/cdn/shop/files/jolla_black_logo.png?v=1718720051&amp;amp;width=600)](/)    [Log in](https://commerce.jolla.com/customer_authentication/redirect?locale=en®ion_country=FI)[Cart](/cart)    ## Item added to your cart    [View…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Jolla Phone and Sailfish OS spark debate over their &amp;#34;open&amp;#34; status, with critics arguing that AOSP is actually more transparent because Sailfish relies on closed-source UI components and proprietary libraries &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48687660&quot; title=&quot;Wanted to mention that Sailfish has a lot of closed-source components, especially UI-related, despite the overall marketing/&amp;#39;vibe&amp;#39; making it look very open. If anything, AOSP (Android) is more open than Sailfish. I don&amp;#39;t think this has changed with Sailfish 5, see e.g.: - https://forum.sailfishos.org/t/sailfish-os-clarifying-claims... - https://docs.sailfishos.org/Develop/Open_Source/&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48688124&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It&amp;#39;s still more open than AOSP I don&amp;#39;t think this is true at all? AOSP is completely open source modulo driver blobs (which Sailfish has too) and Google services. One can make a fully functional system, modulo drivers, out of only open-source components using AOSP. It&amp;#39;s not possible to do this using Sailfish; the compositor, UI libraries (Silica), and most of the &amp;#39;core&amp;#39; apps are still closed source.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents counter that Sailfish offers a superior, traditional GNU/Linux environment—utilizing glibc and standard IPC mechanisms—which avoids the &amp;#34;alien&amp;#34; architecture of Android &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48688070&quot; title=&quot;/etc configuration instead of the insanely bad system properties crap, glibc instead of bionic (which has even worse POSIX compliance than Windows), ld instead of linker, FHS, not having a batshit insane No-Sockets rule, not needing to port software that already compiles and runs on GNU/Linux, X11/Wayland/Arcan, system services aren&amp;#39;t entangled with Java, normal IPC mechanisms instead whatever the fuck binder is. The list goes on. Android (and by extension GrapheneOS) uses Linux as a kernel,…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, though others note this makes running modern mobile apps significantly more difficult &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48688187&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; /etc configuration instead of the insanely bad system properties crap, glibc instead of bionic [...] The practical downside, however, is that this phone does not natively run Android apps, while GrapheneOS runs all Android apps bar those that require Play Integrity. Desktop GNU/Linux programs are either unusable or a terrible experience on a mobile device with a small screen and no mouse.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the discussion highlights concerns regarding Jolla&amp;#39;s aggressive marketing tactics, potential ties to Russia, and a community that some find hostile to criticism &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48687869&quot; title=&quot;I read somewhere that the owners have ties to russia, but the most important thing is that they’re marketing very aggressively through posts that slander GraphenOS.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48687783&quot; title=&quot;Careful with preordering, they seem to ignore requests to cancel &amp;amp; the community is rather hostile to any form of criticism&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alephneuro.com/blog/ultrasound-brain&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ultrasound imaging of the brain&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (alephneuro.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48685558&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;320 points · 123 comments · by rossant&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Aleph has developed a non-invasive ultrasound imaging technique that captures high-resolution 3D maps of brain vasculature through an intact skull, offering MRI-level detail without surgery or bulky equipment. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alephneuro.com/blog/ultrasound-brain&quot; title=&quot;Title: Ultrasound imaging of the brain — Aleph    URL Source: https://alephneuro.com/blog/ultrasound-brain    Markdown Content:  A few years ago, a paper came out that blew our minds. The idea was that you can decode what someone is looking at just from their brain activity.    ![Image 1: Seen double-decker bus and its reconstruction](https://alephneuro.com/blog/mindeye-1.jpg)![Image 2: Seen wading bird and its reconstruction](https://alephneuro.com/blog/mindeye-2.jpg)![Image 3: Seen market scene and…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users are excited by the potential for portable, low-cost brain imaging, critics argue that ultrasound cannot effectively penetrate the skull and that the technology lacks necessary validation against existing standards like MRI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689490&quot; title=&quot;Cool work and proof of concept, and very excited to see where this goes.  However, I do think there is enough exaggeration and missing information here that it warrants some critical appraisal.  What&amp;#39;s really missing is a comparison and validation with any existing medical imaging tech.  Whole brain, contrast-free neurovascular imaging is essentially solved with MRI, why not run a scan and compare?  Ultrasound is of course portable and less expensive, but MRIs are actually widely available in…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692209&quot; title=&quot;This is complete nonsense. Ultrasound can’t effectively penetrate the skull. The entire thing (and Midjourney’s) is vibed-up nonsense. The only reason this even exists as a brainfart and hasn’t been immediately laughed out of VC funding is because other imaging modalities require either ionising radiation (illegal to produce without source licences) or an enormous magnet (would be wildly unsafe in the hands of what appear to be circus clowns). Geoffrey Hinton was hilariously wrong 10 years ago…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant debate exists regarding MRI accessibility; some claim it is a solved problem in efficient systems like Japan&amp;#39;s, while others highlight wait times of several months in Canada and the UK as a reason to pursue cheaper alternatives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689674&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;MRIs are actually widely available in most cities at reasonable cost&amp;#39; - I live in one of those first-world countries, and our citizens regularly wait many months if not over a year to get a single MRI scan. Yes, it&amp;#39;s not just an issue of the MRI but the entire medical system, but the point still stands. Were there machines that were one or more orders of magnitude cheaper and simpler to run - I think we would see a marked increase in availability. I agree on your ground-truth desire, and I…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689690&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; MRIs are actually widely available in most cities at reasonable cost Typical wait time for an MRI in Canada is 2 months.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689817&quot; title=&quot;Yes, that is a economic &amp;amp; public health policy problem that really needs to be solved.  We can look to Japan as example of what&amp;#39;s possible, they have invested in nearly twice the number of scanners per capita of Canada, and they can get same-day MRIs for $50, roughly speaking.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, proponents suggest that even if ultrasound is technically inferior, its potential for use in small clinics or as a wearable device justifies the development of the technology &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689490&quot; title=&quot;Cool work and proof of concept, and very excited to see where this goes.  However, I do think there is enough exaggeration and missing information here that it warrants some critical appraisal.  What&amp;#39;s really missing is a comparison and validation with any existing medical imaging tech.  Whole brain, contrast-free neurovascular imaging is essentially solved with MRI, why not run a scan and compare?  Ultrasound is of course portable and less expensive, but MRIs are actually widely available in…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689974&quot; title=&quot;MRIs are fundamentally expensive. Yes we can bring the price down a bit, and we can set more money aside for them, but they’ll always be limited by their price. Even if this technique is much worse (I can certainly believe it is) the price might allow uses that would never be practical with MRI even with the best financial support. For example, ultrasound might be viable for use in GPs or small medical facilities which could never dream of justifying an MRI machine.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-in-mathematics&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI in mathematics is forcing big questions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (spectrum.ieee.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692883&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;207 points · 175 comments · by rbanffy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of AI in mathematics is sparking debate over whether the technology will replace human intuition or foster a new era of &amp;#34;Big Mathematics&amp;#34; through human-machine collaboration on complex, formalized proofs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-in-mathematics&quot; title=&quot;Title: AI in Mathematics Is Forcing Big Questions    URL Source: https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-in-mathematics    Published Time: 2026-06-25T13:00:01Z    Markdown Content:  Terence Tao of the University of California, Los Angele s, believes AI could usher in an era of “Big Mathematics,” where humans and machines work together on complex problems.    **In the mid-noughties, when** music by the Killers and Franz Ferdinand blared out of every pub and nightclub I passed, I spent my days and nights struggling…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The integration of AI into mathematics has sparked a debate over whether the primary goal of a proof is to verify a theorem&amp;#39;s truth or to provide human-intelligible insights and abstractions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48694801&quot; title=&quot;Here’s one way to think about the difference between coming up with a formal proof and having something other mathematicians can use: &amp;gt; A clear explanation can be found in Alex Kontorovich’s account of his own learning curve with formalized mathematics. In a nutshell: Mathlib, the dominant Lean library, is a human-curated formalization of an ever-growing fraction of existing human mathematics. It exposes clean APIs and abstractions, without which no autoformalization could take place. By…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696051&quot; title=&quot;Imo, the proved theorem is the API. And that&amp;#39;s really all it has to be. If there are other lemmas, etc buried inside that 200k blob that can be factored out and proved and used themselves, so much the better. But denying a machine-valid proof just because it&amp;#39;s incomprehensible with what a human being considers a reasonable effort made to unpack it just seems odd to me. I see no reason not to accept the vibe coded blob if Lean says it&amp;#39;s kosher except anthropocentrism.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696464&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think that&amp;#39;s the point. I think the point is to prove the statement. The techniques and abstractions are a means to an end; making them the point is being seduced by the beauty of the weapon.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that &amp;#34;vibe-coded,&amp;#34; 200,000-line machine-generated proofs are unusable &amp;#34;blobs&amp;#34; that offer no pedagogical value or extensible techniques &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48694801&quot; title=&quot;Here’s one way to think about the difference between coming up with a formal proof and having something other mathematicians can use: &amp;gt; A clear explanation can be found in Alex Kontorovich’s account of his own learning curve with formalized mathematics. In a nutshell: Mathlib, the dominant Lean library, is a human-curated formalization of an ever-growing fraction of existing human mathematics. It exposes clean APIs and abstractions, without which no autoformalization could take place. By…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48695268&quot; title=&quot;You didn’t answer why merge it into a library focused on humans developing mathematics though. It remains all of those things, sitting alone in its own repository of 200kLOC; what benefit comes from merging it into mathlib? &amp;gt; There is also not reason to assume that if we restrict ourselves to the subset of mathematical statements that are human intelligible that this is of any use. This is obviously silly: Things that aren’t human intelligible aren’t human usable, so the restriction is…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696443&quot; title=&quot;You can&amp;#39;t deny it if it&amp;#39;s true, but the point is to find new techniques and abstractions. A proof you can&amp;#39;t extrapolate and learn from is just a checkmark, and about as useful.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, while proponents suggest that requiring human-level understanding is an anthropocentric limitation, as a machine-verified proof is valid regardless of its complexity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696051&quot; title=&quot;Imo, the proved theorem is the API. And that&amp;#39;s really all it has to be. If there are other lemmas, etc buried inside that 200k blob that can be factored out and proved and used themselves, so much the better. But denying a machine-valid proof just because it&amp;#39;s incomprehensible with what a human being considers a reasonable effort made to unpack it just seems odd to me. I see no reason not to accept the vibe coded blob if Lean says it&amp;#39;s kosher except anthropocentrism.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48695231&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Who in their right mind would merge a 200,000-line unaudited vibe-coded blob Anyone who understands type theory and how theorem provers work? It&amp;#39;s sort of akin to saying &amp;#39;how do you know that a massive C++ program that compiles to machine code compiled to the correct machine code that will actually run and it&amp;#39;s just not a random string of bits!?!?!&amp;#39;, you know because the compilation would have failed otherwise(this is different than saying the program behaves correctly, but that&amp;#39;s precisely…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. This tension mirrors historical skepticism toward computer-assisted proofs, highlighting a fundamental divide between those who view mathematics as a search for &amp;#34;checkmarks&amp;#34; of truth and those who see it as a quest for human understanding &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48694087&quot; title=&quot;The use of computers in mathematics has been somewhat controversial from the very start. There are of course all the computer-assisted proofs (see 4 color theorem), as well as the partially-assisted ones (see Viazovska et al on packing problems in dimensions 8, 24). But even finding a solution numerically, then rigorously verifying its properties can leave a lingering sense of incompleteness, of a gap in understanding. I like this one quote by (allegedly) Wigner that illustrates it well: &amp;#39;It is…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48694262&quot; title=&quot;To bluntly put it in a nutshell, and state the obvious: If you don’t understand the problem you can’t be sure that the computer does.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696464&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think that&amp;#39;s the point. I think the point is to prove the statement. The techniques and abstractions are a means to an end; making them the point is being seduced by the beauty of the weapon.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://graphicore.github.io/librebarcode/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Libre Barcode Project&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (graphicore.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48681949&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;286 points · 64 comments · by luu&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Libre Barcode Project provides free fonts and encoding tools to generate barcodes in Code 39, Code 128, and EAN/UPC formats. &lt;a href=&quot;https://graphicore.github.io/librebarcode/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Home | Libre Barcode Project    URL Source: https://graphicore.github.io/librebarcode/    Markdown Content:  Libre Barcode fonts enable you to write barcodes in the    *   [Code 39](https://graphicore.github.io/librebarcode/documentation/code39),  *   [Code 128](https://graphicore.github.io/librebarcode/documentation/code128), and  *   [EAN/UPC](https://graphicore.github.io/librebarcode/documentation/ean13)    formats, with or without text below the code. Visit the individual pages for usage…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users appreciate the project, experienced developers caution against using barcode fonts, recommending instead that users rely on native printer support or generate barcodes as vector images to ensure accuracy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48684870&quot; title=&quot;Do not do this unless you do not have any other choice. Preferrably use whatever native barcode support of the printer involved, if it does not have that, just generate the barcode as vector image or bitmap with a resolution that is a integer fraction of the printers resolution. Generating correct Code128 as a SVG is about the same amount of work as generating the correct input for some sort of barcode font (the hard part is determining the switches between character sets, not generating bars…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that font-based solutions are often no easier than generating SVGs, as the primary difficulty lies in encoding logic rather than visual rendering &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48684870&quot; title=&quot;Do not do this unless you do not have any other choice. Preferrably use whatever native barcode support of the printer involved, if it does not have that, just generate the barcode as vector image or bitmap with a resolution that is a integer fraction of the printers resolution. Generating correct Code128 as a SVG is about the same amount of work as generating the correct input for some sort of barcode font (the hard part is determining the switches between character sets, not generating bars…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights modern alternatives like WASM-based web tools for vector output &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48684977&quot; title=&quot;Shameless plug for my web-based Zint frontend: https://barcode.new (in-browser WASM) I wrote it specifically because most online barcode generators don’t support vector output or suck in some other way: ads, signup necessary, code payload exposed to server-side processing etc.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48685933&quot; title=&quot;Aside from obfuscating the source code to sell licenses, how does this benefit from WASM? Barcodes have been generated for decades on low-resource embedded devices.  Even what would have been a modest-to-low-end machine 25 years ago would have no problem handling the compute needed for this job. On this end, it just looks like the user has to deal with the penalty of dealing with 1 MB of resources when hitting the main page.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt; and nostalgic anecdotes regarding legacy hardware like HP font cartridges &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48685920&quot; title=&quot;I once worked at a company that used a Code39 font cartridge in HP Laserjets.  When HP stopped putting font cartridge slots in their printers, I had the task of intercepting print jobs and detecting the font selection sequence, then taking the text and converting it to a Code128 bitmap graphic.  It wasn&amp;#39;t hard at all, kind of fun actually.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48690546&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;font&amp;#39; cartridge? the what now?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/workweave/router&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: Smart model routing directly in Claude, Codex and Cursor&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48688700&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;210 points · 111 comments · by adchurch&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Weave has launched an RL-trained model router for coding agents that reduces costs by intelligently directing tasks to either efficient or frontier LLMs based on complexity. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/workweave/router&quot; title=&quot;We built a model router that plugs into coding agents (e.g. Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, etc.) and intelligently sends requests to the best model to serve them. Here&amp;amp;#x27;s a quick demo of running it locally: &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.youtube.com&amp;amp;#x2F;watch?v=isKhAyivtfM&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.youtube.com&amp;amp;#x2F;watch?v=isKhAyivtfM&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;At Weave, we write most of our code with AI, and it&amp;amp;#x27;s been getting more expensive. This came to a head when Opus 4.7 was released and,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary debate centers on whether model routers cause excessive cache misses, which can negate cost savings and increase latency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689053&quot; title=&quot;The thing I do not get with these routers is that you will have more cache misses (5min ttl). And if there is one thing i’ve learned; using the cache is crucial. How does this router translate to $$$ when developing?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48690511&quot; title=&quot;This would not work in the way that shows any significant genuine benefit IMO. Caching and optimum routing of a single request are at odds with each other. Higher the distinct model count in a conversation, more cache misses you accept. Based on what OP said elsewhere in the discussion &amp;#39;threshold to switch to another model will be higher&amp;#39; means that essentially you reduce the workflow into two models at most. The two model primitive, one planner and one executor, is already sufficient for such…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. The developers argue that their router is &amp;#34;cache aware,&amp;#34; using a higher threshold to switch models only when the quality or cost benefits outweigh the cache penalty &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689448&quot; title=&quot;You&amp;#39;re right and that&amp;#39;s why we built the router to be cache aware! Once it starts using one model, the threshold to switch to another model will be higher because the additional cost of the cache miss needs to be worth the cost savings or quality increase. This is the key thing that other routers we&amp;#39;ve seen miss: they&amp;#39;re stateless so for a coding agent use case you end up spending more money due to all the cache misses.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48690572&quot; title=&quot;When we started building this we did it as an experiment and we thought the same thing might be true (cache misses would make the whole thing pointless). This turned out not to be true! I think there are 3 reasons intuitively: 1. Small models can carry out a good number of requests e2e  2. Small model for part of a request + cache miss &amp;lt; big model for entire request in many cases  3. Subagents For our own usage we&amp;#39;ve saved 40% so far (that is of course including costs of uncached requests when…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users remain skeptical that routing can outperform a simple two-model (planner/executor) setup &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48690511&quot; title=&quot;This would not work in the way that shows any significant genuine benefit IMO. Caching and optimum routing of a single request are at odds with each other. Higher the distinct model count in a conversation, more cache misses you accept. Based on what OP said elsewhere in the discussion &amp;#39;threshold to switch to another model will be higher&amp;#39; means that essentially you reduce the workflow into two models at most. The two model primitive, one planner and one executor, is already sufficient for such…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689624&quot; title=&quot;That is interesting, sounds like in practice you only end up routing between 2 models&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others see potential for managing strict token budgets or bridging gaps between models with different capabilities, such as tool-calling &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692673&quot; title=&quot;This would have been neat back when I could afford enough tokens to even set it up properly. Now I’ve had to increase my GH Copilot subscription just to cover the bare minimum updates to a few websites every month, and I no longer do any test driving, or even recreational coding projects. I don’t have hundreds of dollars a month to plow into these products, so I’m rationing use, looking for better local options, and being much more discerning about where these tools actually save time.…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48695443&quot; title=&quot;I ran into a problem at work recently: we are given access to a bunch of models up to a full Claude Opus 4.8, but a monthly budget of 100k tokens. We are also given access to Gemini 3.5 Flash &amp;amp; 3.1 Pro with a daily budget of 50M tokens, but no tool calling. I&amp;#39;d love to hook Claude Code (or Pi) into the Gemini model, but the lack of tool-calling makes it quite difficult. I&amp;#39;ve been planning out how an intelligent router might be able to use a token-efficient tool-calling model (including a small…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://aditya.patadia.org/p/ai-and-cloud-costs&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why current LLM costs are not sustainable&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (aditya.patadia.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48683588&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;109 points · &lt;strong&gt;190 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by adityapatadia&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;High AI costs are becoming unsustainable for major companies, but a combination of model performance plateaus, the rise of open-weight models, specialized silicon, and zero switching costs will likely trigger a significant price crash and a shift toward local inference. &lt;a href=&quot;https://aditya.patadia.org/p/ai-and-cloud-costs&quot; title=&quot;Title: AI and Cloud Costs    URL Source: https://aditya.patadia.org/p/ai-and-cloud-costs    Published Time: 2026-06-25T19:13:34+00:00    Markdown Content:  A lot of companies are getting bitten by high AI costs. [Uber burned through](https://fortune.com/2026/05/26/uber-coo-ai-spending-tokens-claude-code/) the entire year’s AI budget in just 4 months and Microsoft, Salesforce and Github are taking steps to reduce AI spend by employees.    On the other hand, AI is making many programming tasks very easy…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current LLM market is characterized as being in a heavily subsidized &amp;#34;$5 airport Uber&amp;#34; era, where subscription models mask the true costs of inference, research, and massive hardware investments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48684148&quot; title=&quot;The problem space has a few aspects: 1. We&amp;#39;re still in the &amp;#39;$5 airport Uber&amp;#39; era of LLMs. They&amp;#39;re heavily subsidized, and everyone still complains about costs. 2. There hasn&amp;#39;t been a real incentive to work on cost optimization for data centers and the hardware they contain. When/if price hikes happen and send people scrambling to use other models or drastically reduce AI usage, this will suddenly need to happen. 3. We&amp;#39;re massively overusing SOTA models. As long as you&amp;#39;re on a subsidized…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48684002&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; To give an example, just doing Typescript type fixes with this model across 50 files cost me $54 this afternoon. If you can use a subscription with any of the SOTA models, do that. Instead of around 4k EUR in token costs, my Opus usage costs me 108 EUR (with taxes) per month with their Max 5x plan. It&amp;#39;s the same with OpenAI, those are heavily subsidized. It doesn&amp;#39;t make sense to pay per-token, unless you must. &amp;gt; What is happening here is that leading AI labs are charging not only for…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48684477&quot; title=&quot;From the article: &amp;gt; What is happening here is that leading AI labs are charging not only for inference but also for research in model architecture, training data collection and curation, model training cost (which can be tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars), paying their employees and recovering the marketing costs. That&amp;#39;s what&amp;#39;s being subsidized.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue these subscriptions are loss-leaders for power users, others suggest they function like gym memberships that profit from under-utilization by average users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48684364&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;3. We&amp;#39;re massively overusing SOTA models. As long as you&amp;#39;re on a subsidized subscription, you can use Claude Opus 4.8 high to write blog article meta descriptions. If you paid by token, you wouldn&amp;#39;t do that. This idea that the subscriptions are subsidized is repeated over and over, but I&amp;#39;ve never seen any proof of this.  It seems to be entirely based on the inferred API cost the subscription usage could give you, but there are a lot of assumptions needed for that to follow.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48684162&quot; title=&quot;Mostly agreed, however I&amp;#39;m not sure about 3: I suspect it works like gym memberships, and the companies mostly make their money from people who don&amp;#39;t use the subscriptions all that much.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48684331&quot; title=&quot;I am using perhaps 15% of usage count on Claude with just the normal subscription. And I do full time software engineering and would say I use quite a lot of AI input on thoughts, designs and code drafts. So how these companies and people manage to use these absurd amount of tokens is a mystery to me.   It feels like this are just running huge amount of non-vetted data to the LLM&amp;#39;s and or running loops against the LLM&amp;#39;s which only produce fractional results if not wasted results for insane cost.…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. To combat high costs, users are increasingly pivoting toward efficient open models and cheaper alternatives like DeepSeek, though this shift raises concerns regarding geopolitical security and potential government intervention &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48684029&quot; title=&quot;There is a wave of users switching over to DeepSeek Flash. There are Reddit threads of users sharing billion token spend for $20. If all of global spend on Anthropic/OpenAI/Gemini APIs just switches over to DeepSeek then easily we can decrease total AI spend by 10x&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48684041&quot; title=&quot;I am not sure if that is wise. It’s a hostile superpower after all&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48684056&quot; title=&quot;Probably won&amp;#39;t be too long before the government decides to block deepseek&amp;#39;s website based on &amp;#39;security&amp;#39; concerns.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lcamtuf.substack.com/p/ai-childrens-books-body-horror-edition&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI children&amp;#39;s books, body horror edition&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lcamtuf.substack.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48681250&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;214 points · 77 comments · by surprisetalk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An investigation into AI-generated children’s encyclopedias on Amazon reveals that many bestsellers are filled with repetitive content and disturbing &amp;#34;body horror&amp;#34; visual glitches, raising concerns about the quality and impact of automated books currently flooding the market. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lcamtuf.substack.com/p/ai-childrens-books-body-horror-edition&quot; title=&quot;Title: AI children&amp;#39;s books, body horror edition    URL Source: https://lcamtuf.substack.com/p/ai-childrens-books-body-horror-edition    Published Time: 2026-06-26T01:09:25+00:00    Markdown Content:  Last week, I posted a visual demonstration of the _sameness_ of AI-generated content. This makes the output easy to spot even if all the individual pieces are perfect facsimiles of what a human could create:    In the article, I collated a list of about 220 AI-generated children’s books, but I deliberately…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the tension between &amp;#34;AI slop&amp;#34; and the potential for high-quality, bespoke storytelling, with some users arguing that AI allows parents to create personalized narratives for their children through sophisticated prompting and emotional arc mapping &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48682059&quot; title=&quot;This just seems like laziness vs AI = bad.  It&amp;#39;s not like publishers are putting out masterpieces with human writing. They&amp;#39;re cranking out minimum viable content as well. I&amp;#39;ve found that by putting meaningful effort into AI storytelling, I can create bespoke stories that my kids love night after night. My workflow is below: Caveat that it costs about $0.25-$0.50 to weave a book like this with Claude Sonnet and Gemini Nano Banana Pro. But to me the cost is worth it for the quality. - Use Claude…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48684402&quot; title=&quot;I really think that a genAI picture book is like a microwave dinner. You can try to pick out a good one, but a corporation has done most of the deciding for you. Ultimately, it will not be as wholesome as something homemade, or as good as something made by an expert, and it will always taste like plastic.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. However, many participants express deep concern over the lack of effort and &amp;#34;plastic&amp;#34; quality of AI content, questioning why anyone would choose synthetic tales over the vast library of existing human-crafted masterpieces &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48681600&quot; title=&quot;The lack of real effort bothers me more than the content itself. We can&amp;#39;t be bothered to even proofread children&amp;#39;s books anymore?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48681823&quot; title=&quot;The concept of consuming AI generated content for children has always baffled me. We collectively have a virtually infinite collection of already existing hand crafted quality content filtered over the years in the form of children stories and tales that we can pick and chose from to read to our children. We love telling stories especially to our children. Why would ANYONE be enticed by the idea of using AI to generate tales when there are so many out there to tap from is really beyond my…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48681872&quot; title=&quot;This seems like an opportunity to celebrate great children&amp;#39;s books created with craft and care by humans. I&amp;#39;ll start: John Rocco, How We Got to the Moon . ( http://www.howwegottothemoon.com/ )&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48684402&quot; title=&quot;I really think that a genAI picture book is like a microwave dinner. You can try to pick out a good one, but a corporation has done most of the deciding for you. Ultimately, it will not be as wholesome as something homemade, or as good as something made by an expert, and it will always taste like plastic.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics also worry about the long-term psychological effects on children, fearing that a constant diet of AI-generated media will distort their perception of reality and replace the essential human connection of parenting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48681720&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been wondering what the long term result on peoples perceptions of reality will be after all this AI slop. I&amp;#39;ve noticed a lot of the times I can spot AI slop videos because they just don&amp;#39;t match what I know to be true, I can think &amp;#39;That&amp;#39;s an AI video of a fox because I know foxes don&amp;#39;t act/move like that&amp;#39; But then the only reason I know that is because I&amp;#39;ve seen hundreds of videos on the internet before AI generated video was a thing. But someone who grew up seeing AI slop from the start…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48683155&quot; title=&quot;There is something unsettling knowing that AI takes over literal parenting. I mean, I&amp;#39;m not trying to argue with your particular use case of AI, but the general idea that AI might be better at raising children than humans. Imagine knowing that if you give your child a tablet with AI and never speak to it, it&amp;#39;ll turn out as a better human being than anything you could reasonably do manually. Of course your current method requires quite a few steps, but it&amp;#39;s not hard to imagine a tablet where you…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48681931&quot; title=&quot;One of the scariest things to me about getting older is that there&amp;#39;s entire generations younger than me who don&amp;#39;t realize a growing number of things we used to have and lost. Because, like you said, they grew up without it. And they don&amp;#39;t believe things even can be better because they regularly hear one of the dumbest ideas of our time: that the past wasn&amp;#39;t actually better, we only remember it that way.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-06-25</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-06-25</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/apple-raises-prices-macbooks-ipads-memory-costs-skyrocket-2026-06-25/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apple raises prices of MacBooks, iPads&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (reuters.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48672732&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;841 points · &lt;strong&gt;1244 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by virgildotcodes&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple has increased the prices of its MacBook and iPad lineups in response to skyrocketing memory component costs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/apple-raises-prices-macbooks-ipads-memory-costs-skyrocket-2026-06-25/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;9to5mac.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;06&amp;amp;#x2F;25&amp;amp;#x2F;apple-price-increases-mac-ipad-more&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;9to5mac.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;06&amp;amp;#x2F;25&amp;amp;#x2F;apple-price-increases-mac-ipa...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple’s significant price increases across its hardware lineup &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676925&quot; title=&quot;These are the price changes mentioned in the article: Macs MacBook Neo: $699 (up from $599)    13-inch MacBook Air: $1,299 (up from $1,099)    15-inch MacBook Air: $1,499 (up from $1,299)    M5 MacBook Pro: $1,999 (up from $1,699)    M5 Pro MacBook Pro: $2,499 (up from $2,199)    M5 Max MacBook Pro: $4,099 (up from $3,599)    iMac: $1,499 (up from $1,299)    M4 Max Mac Studio: $2,499 (up from $1,999)    M3 Ultra Mac Studio: $5,299 (up from $3,999) iPads iPad: $449 (up from $349)    11-inch iPad Air:…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt; have sparked frustration, with some users blaming the &amp;#34;dystopian&amp;#34; reality of AI companies monopolizing the global memory supply &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48672936&quot; title=&quot;Just yesterday I saw people saying that Apple wouldn&amp;#39;t increase prices until the next refresh. And I agreed! So… holy shit. I think we&amp;#39;re going to see even further price increases across the industry. There already were a ton, but it can always get worse, of course. Thank you, OpenAI. What would have we done without your attempts at monopolizing destroying the memory market.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48673056&quot; title=&quot;The fact that a dozen companies are allowed to buy up the entire global supply of core components, and increase the cost of living for every human on Earth, is full blown dystopian.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48674051&quot; title=&quot;Anyone else here enjoy living in the future? Look at us, we get AI megacorporations ruling the world and bestowing us with the power to use their servers for just $20-200/month. It&amp;#39;s practically charity, and all we had to give up for it is all consumer hardware, the quality of the internet and our own jobs. I love it here!&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters find perspective in the long-term trend of computing becoming cheaper and more ubiquitous &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48675528&quot; title=&quot;Some unc perspective: I paid ~$6,000 in inflation-adjusted dollars for a computer in 1996. Today, I can get the same power in a $6 single board computer. A powerful modern mini PC starts at ~$600. However painful these price hikes are, and they are painful, it is worth remembering that computing has become incredibly ubiquitous and cheap.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that these costs are exacerbated by inefficient software abstractions and &amp;#34;bloated&amp;#34; frameworks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48675694&quot; title=&quot;The computing power available today is such a double-edged sword. We can do so much more so much faster, but then we (including myself in this) waste so many cycles on abstractions and frameworks and layers of libraries to make our development jobs easier.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676506&quot; title=&quot;If the absurd memory prices might have some positive outcome, it will be consumers demanding that all their basic pack of apps are able to run on 16 and even 8 GB of RAM, by means of avoiding those that hog their machines. And consequently (hopefully), developers and their managers being incentivized by market forces to have a modicum of care for performance and not wasting bytes. Dreaming is free... All Electron devs, let&amp;#39;s go back to native-er toolkits! Qt and Slint are already here for…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a shared skepticism that prices will ever return to previous levels &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48672887&quot; title=&quot;I have a suspicion these new prices will stick around, even after the RAM shortage ends. Speaking of which, what&amp;#39;s the timeline of the RAM shortage ending? I have no sense for whether it is going to be (for example) 6 months or 3 years.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, alongside concerns that regulatory capture has left consumers unprotected from such industry-wide hikes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48673145&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s why some regulation is not the enemy of the people that some want to make it out to be. Unfortunately, I think regulatory capture is so deep now in most places, one can hardly expect anyone to do anything about it.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48677942&quot; title=&quot;To be fair, Microsoft announced their third XBox price hike today. &amp;gt; The price of XBOX consoles will increase by US$100 for 512 GB models and US$150 for 1 TB models. We will also be sunsetting our 2 TB model. https://kotaku.com/xbox-price-increase-2026-tariffs-buy-now-... This is in addition to the other two recent price hikes.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://scrollprize.org/firstscroll&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;An entire Herculaneum scroll has been read for the first time&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (scrollprize.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48675179&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1697 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 365 comments · by verditelabs&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Using artificial intelligence and CT imaging, researchers have successfully deciphered an entire carbonized papyrus scroll from Herculaneum for the first time, revealing previously unreadable ancient Greek text. &lt;a href=&quot;https://scrollprize.org/firstscroll&quot; title=&quot;Preprint: &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;scrollprize.org&amp;amp;#x2F;pdf&amp;amp;#x2F;main.pdf&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;scrollprize.org&amp;amp;#x2F;pdf&amp;amp;#x2F;main.pdf&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;github.com&amp;amp;#x2F;ScrollPrize&amp;amp;#x2F;villa&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;github.com&amp;amp;#x2F;ScrollPrize&amp;amp;#x2F;villa&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The successful reading of the Herculaneum scrolls has sparked excitement about the potential to recover lost Greek and Latin works, of which only an estimated 1% currently survive &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48677771&quot; title=&quot;This could eventually completely transform our understanding of Antiquity. It is estimated that only around 1% of the ancient works in Greek and Latin have survived to the present day, much less in other languages such as Punic [0]. Some works and some authors we only know by name because they were alluded to in later texts. It&amp;#39;s also well known that surviving texts survived because they were copied again and again on costly animal skin during the Middle Ages, by monks who had to make a choice…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some hope for a diverse library of ancient knowledge, others caution that the specific site may primarily contain Epicurean philosophy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48677500&quot; title=&quot;Only about 20% of the Herculaneum site has been excavated, so there is high probability that more scrolls exist. The current scrolls were not part of the main library, but more of a private collection at the time. So imagine how cool it would be to find a full library with thousand of scrolls across many different topics, that can now be read with this technology.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676854&quot; title=&quot;Probably a lot more texts of Epicurean philosophy and not a whole lot else unfortunately according to my papyrologist friend.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters reflected on the staggering technological leap required to read these carbonized documents—described as &amp;#34;machines made of sand and lightning&amp;#34;—and questioned whether modern translators accurately capture the original casual or formal tone of the authors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48679532&quot; title=&quot;Lets reflect on Aristocreon, in about 200 BC, putting their thoughts down on a scroll. They would be aware that the scroll might be kept in a library for some time. Maybe they could have imagined it surviving for 300 years. But they never would have imagined that in 300 years a volcano might destroy the scroll, but in some way preserve it. And then that nearly two thousand years later future humans with machines made of materials unimaginable to Aristocreon, but related distantly to sand and…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676823&quot; title=&quot;When I read translations like these, I always wonder if the tone is translated. Did the writer mean to convey a very formal “to the utmost”, or was it a more casual “to the max”. How much of the translators bias makes these seem like academic papers instead of social media posts.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://expression.fire.org/p/the-papers-please-era-of-the-internet&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The &amp;#39;papers, please&amp;#39; era of the internet will decimate your privacy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (expression.fire.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48679608&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1140 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 612 comments · by bilsbie&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Governments in Australia, Europe, and the United States are increasingly mandating online age verification, a &amp;#34;papers, please&amp;#34; approach that critics argue compromises user anonymity, increases data breach risks, and fails to effectively restrict social media use among minors. &lt;a href=&quot;https://expression.fire.org/p/the-papers-please-era-of-the-internet&quot; title=&quot;Title: The ‘papers, please’ era of the internet will decimate your privacy    URL Source: https://expression.fire.org/p/the-papers-please-era-of-the-internet    Published Time: 2026-06-25T17:38:16+00:00    Markdown Content:  [![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on whether the &amp;#34;papers, please&amp;#34; era can be mitigated by technology, with some suggesting anonymous cryptographic credentials that prove age without revealing identity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48680202&quot; title=&quot;There are at least some technological solutions here, such as anonymous credentials. [1] Modern versions of this technique allow one to associate metadata (like a proof of age exceeding a threshold) in such a way that the verifier can&amp;#39;t even correlate repeated requests across users. Governments that are serious about age verification and individual privacy (which, doubtful they truly are) should agree on a protocol and set up certificate issuers that are associated with a digital ID. Then age…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48680236&quot; title=&quot;Using cryptographic signatures from approved signers, like a government&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. However, skeptics argue these systems are flawed because unlinkable tokens could be easily shared with minors, and true enforcement would ultimately require the high-friction, invasive identity tracking the article warns against &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48680217&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Modern versions of this technique allow one to associate metadata (like a proof of age exceeding a threshold) in such a way that the verifier can&amp;#39;t even correlate repeated requests across users. If it&amp;#39;s unlinkable, what&amp;#39;s preventing someone from setting up a site that hands out anonymous tokens for anyone to use?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48680476&quot; title=&quot;The article talks about the possibilities of malicious cloning of these tokens by third parties, but fails to identify the much more common use case, and one that makes this scheme useless for age verification. It&amp;#39;s one thing to be concerned about someone stealing my credential, but another to prevent the transfer of these credentials, especially if they are limited use credentials. The entire point of age verification systems is to prevent minors from accessing certain resources. I think we…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48680282&quot; title=&quot;No, I&amp;#39;m meant me, using my 18+ ID to generate a bunch of tokens that can&amp;#39;t be linked back to me, and then giving it to random &amp;lt; 18 year olds for the lulz.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Many participants contend that the solution lies in parental responsibility and improved device-level controls rather than government-mandated digital IDs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48680717&quot; title=&quot;There is a much easier solution that already exists - parental controls on children&amp;#39;s devices. I honestly don&amp;#39;t understand why is it not solving the problem? Yes, parents are responsible to set this up. But parents are also responsible to lock their alcohol, drugs or guns, condoms, etc., and many other things. Perhaps parental controls are not good enough? That&amp;#39;s where the regulation could genuinely help - require child-certified devices to implement minimum set of parental controls, and make…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48680274&quot; title=&quot;Parents taking responsibility for their kids. I grew up in a neighborhood full of drug dealers. Street sellers, not the classy Walter White kind. Ironically being on a computer all day kept me out of trouble. But with these laws in place I guess you might as well start doing stupid ish in real life.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, though others feel such measures are necessary to address the aggressive harm the internet poses to children &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48680215&quot; title=&quot;I can’t think of a better solution to the issue of children being so aggressively harmed by the internet. That doesn’t remove any of the problems associated with this.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://om.co/2026/06/24/1966-2026/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Om Malik has died&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (om.co)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48678852&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1343 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 169 comments · by minimaxir&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Om Malik, the influential technology journalist and founder of Gigaom, has passed away at the age of 60. &lt;a href=&quot;https://om.co/2026/06/24/1966-2026/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;runtimewire.com&amp;amp;#x2F;article&amp;amp;#x2F;om-malik-taught-silicon-valley-to-read-itself&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;runtimewire.com&amp;amp;#x2F;article&amp;amp;#x2F;om-malik-taught-silicon-vall...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The tech community is mourning the loss of Om Malik, remembering him as a &amp;#34;brutally honest&amp;#34; journalist and venture partner who focused deeply on founder stories and photography after surviving early heart issues &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48679260&quot; title=&quot;Oh wow. What?!  Just this morning I had an occasion to go thru his site/blog. Still can&amp;#39;t believe it. 60 is too young. I met Om finally in 2013-ish at one of his GigaOm events in the SF Bay Area. Before that, I had been a long time reader of his GigaOm blogs and other writings  at Fast Company, Red Herring, Light Reading, and elsewhere, including his book Broadbandits . He was one of the few bloggers / reporters who wrote it as he saw it; his takes were often brutally honest and pointed. He…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48681123&quot; title=&quot;A tragic loss. Amongst his many other talents, Om was a wonderful photographer; you can see some of his photos at Glass: https://glass.photo/om&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters highlight his embodiment of the &amp;#34;selflessly-helping side&amp;#34; of Silicon Valley, where introductions and support are often given without expectation of anything in return &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48679995&quot; title=&quot;GigaOM was truly awesome at its best. Om was a special guy, I met him a few times during my years in the Bay Area. He really embodied that selflessly-helping side of the Valley: helping others with no expectations, just because it’s good. He helped one of my startups get some exposure. I keep trying to pay it forward. I will miss him.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48680971&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;the selflessly-helping side of the Valley&amp;#39; Never having lived in the valley, I&amp;#39;ve struggled to understand what it means. Can anyone share some examples?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48681538&quot; title=&quot;There is a really tremendous streak of people helping people with no strings attached that I hadn’t found anywhere else I’ve lived. Especially but not exclusively on the engineering / product side - for a long time you could take a greyhound to Soma and have a couch to crash on and a job interview lined up without knowing anyone. Introductions are made without a second thought (extremely contrary to my east coast experience where to get an intro, it must be “worth” something to the third…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some reflect on his final blog post as a poignant farewell, others noted his significant influence through GigaOM and his critiques of corporate excess &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48680595&quot; title=&quot;Very sad reading his penultimate blog post: https://om.co/2026/06/08/taking-a-few-days-off/&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48680124&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Malik was also a frequent guest on the former CrankyGeeks podcast with John C. Dvorak. That takes me back, he was always great on that show.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48679260&quot; title=&quot;Oh wow. What?!  Just this morning I had an occasion to go thru his site/blog. Still can&amp;#39;t believe it. 60 is too young. I met Om finally in 2013-ish at one of his GigaOm events in the SF Bay Area. Before that, I had been a long time reader of his GigaOm blogs and other writings  at Fast Company, Red Herring, Light Reading, and elsewhere, including his book Broadbandits . He was one of the few bloggers / reporters who wrote it as he saw it; his takes were often brutally honest and pointed. He…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-25/ford-has-been-rehiring-quality-inspectors-after-ai-fell-short&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ford AI hiccups push carmaker to rehire ‘gray beard’ inspectors&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bloomberg.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48674446&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;617 points · 545 comments · by alanwreath&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ford is rehiring experienced human quality inspectors after its artificial intelligence systems failed to accurately detect manufacturing defects in new vehicles. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-25/ford-has-been-rehiring-quality-inspectors-after-ai-fell-short&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;DI4Cq&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;DI4Cq&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ford executives are facing criticism for &amp;#34;cargo culting&amp;#34; AI as a pretext for layoffs, with commenters arguing that the decision-makers suffer no personal consequences for these &amp;#34;profoundly stupid&amp;#34; strategic failures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48675092&quot; title=&quot;Interestingly, there were no consequences for the execs that made this &amp;#39;mistake&amp;#39;. There seems to be almost unlimited cover for execs cargo culting on using AI as a pretext for layoffs. If it doesn&amp;#39;t implode almost immediately, they get massive bonuses, if it blows up in their face, oh well they had the courage to &amp;#39;take a bold strategic decision&amp;#39; In other words, they don&amp;#39;t really have a plan, but they are happy playing with people&amp;#39;s lives via layoffs, since it&amp;#39;s the &amp;#39;in&amp;#39; thing to do. The…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676110&quot; title=&quot;Generally, you don’t want to punish people for making decisions. At least I don’t. I value people who are willing to try things and I generally believe any decision made in good faith is better than no decision. My litmus test is was it a reasonable decision given the information available at the time in service of a greater goal. I can live with the consequences of that. If it turns out to be a not so great decision then we can fix it. I’m not going to fire someone for the result when the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48675272&quot; title=&quot;There is a huge cost for this either way (severance packages, yes, but also lost productivity, reduced team coherence, etc), but that unfortunately doesn’t necessarily translate to a political cost for the managers involved in pushing the dumb idea, particularly if the CEO was pressuring everyone for cost savings. They will escape by saying, “We did it because everyone else is doing it and we were told it was the right thing. How were we to know that it wouldn’t work?”&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics highlight that replacing senior inspectors with AI was fundamentally flawed because experienced experts are the very people best equipped to oversee and correct the &amp;#34;blind spots&amp;#34; of current AI models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48674916&quot; title=&quot;Setting aside how shortsighted it is to fire your employees to replace them with AI, Ford also screwed up by firing the wrong employees. LLMs work best in the hands of experienced senior engineers who can work at a high level of abstraction because they already understand all the pieces underneath. In a sense, using an LLM agent is like providing instructions to a very smart, very quick junior who despite being brilliant has some blind spots and lacks institutional knowledge. That&amp;#39;s something…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, the company likely suffered a permanent loss of top talent who, having been discarded for a &amp;#34;magic black box&amp;#34; solution, are unlikely to return to an incompetent management structure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48675051&quot; title=&quot;This idea is everywhere right now, that AI is some magic black box that will solve all your business problems. The sentiment is spreading through the exec team where I work now too. It&amp;#39;s like a disease. C-suites completely disconnected from reality and assuming we&amp;#39;ve already achieved ASI/AGI, and marketing teams &amp;amp; business journals are only furthering that narrative. It&amp;#39;s so weird. I don&amp;#39;t know what it is about AI that causes people to throw all thought and caution to the wind and charge…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48674741&quot; title=&quot;I would literally be homeless before I went back to a company that fired me to replace me with AI, then asked me to come back.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48675229&quot; title=&quot;Presumably they&amp;#39;re also out the top 10-20% of talent which immediately found jobs elsewhere and would have little interest in returning to Ford to work under such incompetent management.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hackernewstrends.com&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: I made Google Trends for Hacker News by indexing 18 years of comments&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (hackernewstrends.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48673671&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;806 points · 155 comments · by ytkimirti&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hacker Trends is a new tool that indexes 18 years of Hacker News data, allowing users to chart and compare the popularity of over 45 million posts and comments to visualize tech trends, product launches, and industry shifts since 2007. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hackernewstrends.com&quot; title=&quot;Title: Hacker Trends: 18 years of Hacker News, charted    URL Source: https://hackernewstrends.com/    Markdown Content:  ## Hacker Trends - see how any topic, tool, or person trended across 18 years of Hacker News    Charts how often any topic, tool, or person has come up on Hacker News. Overlay a few terms to watch their traction rise and fall. Each line is a live date-histogram over 45M posts and comments, built on[Upstash Redis Search](https://upstash.com/docs/redis/search). Below the chart sit…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The project allows users to visualize word occurrences in Hacker News history, though some note it functions more like Google Ngrams than Google Trends since it tracks published text rather than search intent &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48675818&quot; title=&quot;Google Trends is about searches This is about published text . More like if Google Trends counted word occurrences on webpages. Or if Google Ngrams counted webpages instead of books People don&amp;#39;t write much about non-newsworthy things whereas many people search &amp;#39;burger&amp;#39; anytime they want a burger delivery. The datasets aren&amp;#39;t usable in the same way Edit: not to say it&amp;#39;s not a cool product! Just keep this in mind and enjoy using it :)&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48673784&quot; title=&quot;Hello HN, This was a small project of mine after I&amp;#39;ve found out that I can simply the whole hackernews archive (~48GB) and play around with it. You can compare terms just like in google trends and you can also see the exact posts &amp;amp; comments from that time. I like that you can discover what went crazy in the timeline, they just come up as small burst of activity, it&amp;#39;s quite fun to play around with it. https://hackernewstrends.com/?q=litecoin&amp;amp;q=dogecoin&amp;amp;q=solana... I also have a seperate page for…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While the creator and others highlighted existing public datasets and APIs for such tools, a debate emerged regarding data ownership and licensing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48675889&quot; title=&quot;I host a publicly open database with Hacker News data at https://play.clickhouse.com/play?user=play#U0VMRUNUICogRlJPT... So you can create any sort of similar services in a single SQL query and an HTML page. I also hosted it as a publicly accessible data lake, which you can query from everywhere: https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/issues/29693#issuec... It is also updated in real-time.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48673784&quot; title=&quot;Hello HN, This was a small project of mine after I&amp;#39;ve found out that I can simply the whole hackernews archive (~48GB) and play around with it. You can compare terms just like in google trends and you can also see the exact posts &amp;amp; comments from that time. I like that you can discover what went crazy in the timeline, they just come up as small burst of activity, it&amp;#39;s quite fun to play around with it. https://hackernewstrends.com/?q=litecoin&amp;amp;q=dogecoin&amp;amp;q=solana... I also have a seperate page for…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676502&quot; title=&quot;Oh, now I see my comment might be a bit harsh. I didn&amp;#39;t consider you might now know about: https://github.com/hackernews/api&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. One user requested their data be removed, leading to a disagreement over whether Y Combinator’s terms of service allow third parties to redistribute user content for non-YC purposes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676387&quot; title=&quot;oh hey, per HN terms and conditions I license my HN data only to HN. Can you please remove my data from the set? Thank you!&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676452&quot; title=&quot;By uploading any User Content you hereby grant and will grant Y Combinator and its affiliated companies a nonexclusive, worldwide, royalty free, fully paid up, transferable, sublicensable, perpetual, irrevocable license to copy, display, upload, perform, distribute, store, modify and otherwise use your User Content for any Y Combinator-related purpose in any form, medium or technology now known or later developed. @zX41ZdbW, you can safely ignore this guy. @GeoAtreides, next time read the…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676494&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Y Combinator and its affiliated companies is zX41ZdbW either?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676577&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; for any Y Combinator-related purpose That is actually the key phrase. HN can provide the API, no problem. People can consume the API, no problem.. But I&amp;#39;d ask an attorney if API consumers can then re-release the data for purposes not related to YC. By my reading, they cannot.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hl2.slqnt.dev/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Half-Life 2 in a Browser&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (hl2.slqnt.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48669534&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;683 points · 272 comments · by panza&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A new web-based project allows users to run the classic first-person shooter *Half-Life 2* directly within a web browser. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hl2.slqnt.dev/&quot; title=&quot;Title: web hl2    URL Source: https://hl2.slqnt.dev/    Published Time: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 12:48:11 GMT    Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.  Warning: This is a cached snapshot of the original page, consider retry with caching opt-out.    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1](https://hl2.slqnt.dev/assets/hl2.png)  Downloading...&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The project highlights a technical irony where *Half-Life 2* is playable on modern macOS via a browser despite Valve never updating the official Steam version for 64-bit compatibility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48670182&quot; title=&quot;Interesting, I am not able to play HL2 on Steam because macOS no longer has 32-bit support and Valve never compiled if for 64-bit but here we are, it’s playable on the same OS in the browser. BTW IIRC there was some method to convert the 32-bit game binaries to make them run on recent macs. I remember doing it.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48670892&quot; title=&quot;I admit that Valve’s approach to Steam on macOS has never made sense to me.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users question why more games aren&amp;#39;t published using mature WASM and WebGL technologies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48672511&quot; title=&quot;With WASM and WebGL being mature technologies, I&amp;#39;m not sure why there aren&amp;#39;t more video games published this way.  For really big games with lots of assets,  having those assets in local storage makes sense.  But I wouldn&amp;#39;t mind if a game &amp;#39;installer&amp;#39; is just your browser asking &amp;#39;This game wants to use up to 20 GB of local disc space.  Is that okay?&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others debate the legality of this port, noting it likely constitutes unauthorized redistribution of copyrighted assets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48669652&quot; title=&quot;This is cool, and also probably illegal, since you don&amp;#39;t own any of this and don&amp;#39;t have the right to redistribute it.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48669674&quot; title=&quot;While technically impressive, this is also illegal. (unless you have redistribution permission from the authors.)&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48669904&quot; title=&quot;That is up for the copyright owner to enforce or not to enforce. Until they decide, we can&amp;#39;t know if it&amp;#39;s illegal or not - who knows, this site might have a license.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these legal concerns, some argue that Valve is unlikely to pursue a takedown due to potential PR backlash and the fact that they have previously given the game away for free &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48670115&quot; title=&quot;Valve already gave Half-Life 2 away for free, and released the source code of the HL1 engine. Is it technically illegal? Yeah, but Valve isn&amp;#39;t losing out on any money, and there&amp;#39;s no way they&amp;#39;re going to risk the negative PR blowback they&amp;#39;d get for a takedown. Besides, IP law is dead. The rise of AI made it pretty clear that you can steal literally anything without consequences.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/mfts0/status/2070080422482977095&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hey Nico, you didn&amp;#39;t vibe code your data room but stole it from Papermark&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48672328&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;614 points · 289 comments · by mmunj&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The founder of Papermark has accused a developer of stealing his open-source code to build a competing data room product rather than creating it from scratch using AI &amp;#34;vibe coding&amp;#34; as claimed. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/mfts0/status/2070080422482977095&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;mfts0&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2070080422482977095&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;mfts0&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2070080422482977095&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on allegations that a project was not &amp;#34;vibe coded&amp;#34; from scratch but was instead a copy of the open-source project Papermark &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48672863&quot; title=&quot;Folks... read the actual tweet. They literally didn&amp;#39;t vibe code it - they copy-pasted another project.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that open-source code cannot be &amp;#34;stolen&amp;#34; unless license terms are violated &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48672793&quot; title=&quot;Unless you don&amp;#39;t copy the license terms, it&amp;#39;s impossible to &amp;#39;steal&amp;#39; open-source code. That&amp;#39;s... sort of the point.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48672825&quot; title=&quot;That means they&amp;#39;re not complying with the license terms. Which would be stealing. Like I said it would be.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others emphasize that the AGPL license requires the derivative work to release its changes and maintain attribution &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48672838&quot; title=&quot;Many open source licenses levy restrictions upon the acceptable use of the software. Those restrictions may include attribution requirements, up to and including a requirement to include the license when redistributing the code; they may forbid using derivative works for commercial purposes; they may require the downstream project to utilize the same license. Open source is not the same thing as &amp;#39;anybody can do anything they want forever.&amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48672816&quot; title=&quot;Papermark is AGPL; Corgi must release all its changes.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters expressed disbelief at the &amp;#34;shamelessness&amp;#34; of the responses from the accused &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48673747&quot; title=&quot;What a scumbag. The replies from Nico are insane: “Team effort” “:praying-hands (x2)” And so on… The audacity and complete shamelessness… I wonder what narrative they tell themselves.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt; and speculated that the situation could escalate to legal action if the license terms were indeed ignored &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48673995&quot; title=&quot;I wonder if Nico will be feeling so cocky when Papermark gets their general counsel involved. The public Twitter shaming was clearly an attempt to resolve this without litigation, but hey, if that&amp;#39;s how Nico truly feels, guess he gets to see what&amp;#39;s behind door #2 (a massive bill for a legal retainer).&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676867&quot; title=&quot;I am curious how this will play out legally. Surely UI enough isn&amp;#39;t enough to prove that source code was plagiarised? In the event Papermark chooses to sue how will the defendant defend themselves short of presenting their own (possibly) closed source?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://9to5mac.com/2026/06/23/lastpass-notifies-users-of-yet-another-data-breach/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LastPass notifies users of yet another data breach&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (9to5mac.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48671468&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;524 points · 236 comments · by mooreds&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LastPass is notifying users of a data breach at market research firm Klue that exposed customer contact information and support case data, though the company states that encrypted password vaults were not affected. &lt;a href=&quot;https://9to5mac.com/2026/06/23/lastpass-notifies-users-of-yet-another-data-breach/&quot; title=&quot;Title: LastPass notifies users of yet another data breach    URL Source: https://9to5mac.com/2026/06/23/lastpass-notifies-users-of-yet-another-data-breach/    Published Time: 2026-06-23T21:48:37+00:00    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: LastPass system outage - down for users](https://9to5mac.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2024/03/lastpass-outage.jpg?quality=82&amp;amp;strip=all&amp;amp;w=1600)  LastPass users are once again being warned about stolen personal data, though this time the breach happened through one of the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The recurring security incidents at LastPass have led many to question how the company maintains user trust, with some suggesting the product is now used more for &amp;#34;security theater&amp;#34; or convenience than actual protection &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48672158&quot; title=&quot;How does anyone seriously trust LastPass anymore? Years ago, I was working for a company handling bank data. They were using LP immediately following a previous LP security incident and had no plans to migrate away.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48672266&quot; title=&quot;A lot of people and orgs don&amp;#39;t use security products for security. They use them for security theater. A vast majority of people, even many security people, will never hear about this breach. So LastPass still works great for them.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48672794&quot; title=&quot;I think a lot of people use products like LastPass because it makes storing passwords easier. Works on mobile, computer, tablet. Pretty good experience tbh. With something like LastPass it&amp;#39;s also much easier to create unique strong passwords for other sites. Also, let&amp;#39;s be real: &amp;gt; The information accessed was limited to standard business contact information and related customer relationship management (CRM) data, including customer names, phone numbers, email addresses, and physical addresses,…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this specific breach of CRM data is less critical than a leak of actual password vaults, others point out that password managers create a &amp;#34;systemic risk&amp;#34; by centralizing all credentials into a single, high-value target for attackers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48672794&quot; title=&quot;I think a lot of people use products like LastPass because it makes storing passwords easier. Works on mobile, computer, tablet. Pretty good experience tbh. With something like LastPass it&amp;#39;s also much easier to create unique strong passwords for other sites. Also, let&amp;#39;s be real: &amp;gt; The information accessed was limited to standard business contact information and related customer relationship management (CRM) data, including customer names, phone numbers, email addresses, and physical addresses,…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48672058&quot; title=&quot;Using a password manager has 2 main tradeoffs and mistakes: 1- Tradeoff individual account risk, for systemic risk. You may argue password managers are safe, but few would argue that the risk model reduces the risk of individual password leaks more than the risk of all your passwords leaking. It&amp;#39;s a tradeoff. 2- Cat and mouse security: There&amp;#39;s a class of security decisions that work because they are new and different. First the weakness was that passwords were short, then you make passwords…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Consequently, many users advocate for migrating to local, cross-platform alternatives like KeePassXC to avoid the risks associated with third-party cloud vendors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48672353&quot; title=&quot;Sitting here with my KeepassX and being happy, again.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48672477&quot; title=&quot;For folks new to the KeePass ecosystem, it’s KeePassXC[0] now. The original KeePass is still developed as well, however KeePassXC is a cross-platform updated version. [0] https://keepassxc.org/&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48673180&quot; title=&quot;How does anyone trust ANY third party with all their passwords and encryption keys is beyond me. Setting up KeePassXC is trivial.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-25/apple-to-skip-high-end-m6-mac-chips-to-launch-m7-pro-m7-max-m7-ultra-instead?embedded-checkout=true&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apple to skip high-end M6 Mac chips in favor of AI-focused M7 line&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bloomberg.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676795&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;316 points · &lt;strong&gt;375 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by scrlk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple plans to bypass high-end versions of its M6 processor, moving directly to an AI-focused M7 chip lineup that includes Pro, Max, and Ultra variants. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-25/apple-to-skip-high-end-m6-mac-chips-to-launch-m7-pro-m7-max-m7-ultra-instead?embedded-checkout=true&quot; title=&quot;Giftlink: &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.bloomberg.com&amp;amp;#x2F;news&amp;amp;#x2F;articles&amp;amp;#x2F;2026-06-25&amp;amp;#x2F;apple-to-skip-high-end-m6-mac-chips-to-launch-m7-pro-m7-max-m7-ultra-instead?accessToken=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJzb3VyY2UiOiJTdWJzY3JpYmVyR2lmdGVkQXJ0aWNsZSIsImlhdCI6MTc4MjQwNTU2MCwiZXhwIjoxNzgzMDEwMzYwLCJhcnRpY2xlSWQiOiJUSDM4OFJUOTZPU08wMCIsImJjb25uZWN0SWQiOiJDNEVEQ0FFMUZBMDU0MEJFQTI0QTlGMjExQzFFOTA4MCJ9.3RpcTAgL-JUz9iWRQYzyWaSzoOhLU50chTDHkeU0GTI&amp;#39;…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple’s reported pivot to an AI-focused M7 chip line is seen as a strategic move to incentivize local LLM inference, potentially challenging the dominance of frontier labs if consumer hardware becomes powerful enough &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48681780&quot; title=&quot;Apple is actually interesting. They are one of the few companies with a chip / PC play with real power AND basically no play I&amp;#39;m the hyperscalar market. That means they&amp;#39;re actually incentivized at least short term, to benefit PCs becoming strong enough to do local LLMs. Which makes this play make even more sense. Though, I&amp;#39;ve been saying for a while that the local AI inflectiom point is the death knell for these frontier labs.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48682054&quot; title=&quot;Indeed. If Apple makes it feasible to run models like GLM 5.2 at home, I will become their customer.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. However, skeptics argue that local hardware still lags behind data center accelerators by orders of magnitude in power and thermal efficiency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48682328&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Though, I&amp;#39;ve been saying for a while that the local AI inflectiom point is the death knell for these frontier labs. &amp;#39;Death knell&amp;#39; is a touch hyperbolic. Hardware that can only run quantized models that take up GBs in VRAM falls short of even an A100 (by almost an order of magnitude[0]), which in turn falls short of what an 8xH100 cluster can do (also by another order of magnitude[0]). I&amp;#39;m an avid believer in local LLMs, but I cannot deceive myself - data center accelerators will win on power…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, and that Apple’s high &amp;#34;RAM tax&amp;#34; and supply constraints may make high-memory machines prohibitively expensive for most users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48684090&quot; title=&quot;768GB RAM pipe dreams make no sense to Apple. By discontinuing 256GB / 512GB M3 Ultra and raising prices $5000 -&amp;gt; $7000 on Macbook pro with 128GB they basically confirmed how badly RAM shortage affecting them. 768GB is 64-times of 12GB which is rumored to be amount of RAM in new iPhones. Imagine what profit margin 768GB Mac Studio gonna need in order to justify making one instead of 64 iPhones. Apple is the company that is okay about selling microfiber cloth for $100 and wheels for $700.…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48682184&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s plausible but is the Apple Tax for a 1TB memory machine on top of current memory prices really worth it? I paid around $4000 for 4090m laptop with 16GB VRAM back in 2023, it&amp;#39;s great but DoA for even quantized LLMs. I can run SLMs and fine tune it but that&amp;#39;s it. We need one of those specialized inference chip startups to succeed and a PC manufacturer willing to bet on them against Nvidia for the local AI to find mass market appeal.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48684318&quot; title=&quot;They could treat the extreme spec machines separately from the prosumer ones, like they did with the Xserve. Let business customers spec up to 768GB (say) who are prepared for a $20-25k price tag, while keeping them away from the stores and usual consumer supply chains (Amazon et al). It may not be a big enough market segment for them to care about anymore, though.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some anticipate an inflection point for local inference if memory bandwidth reaches 1,200+ GB/s &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48681336&quot; title=&quot;The article says base M7 memory bandwidth is targeted at 240GB/s. M1 had 70 GB/s, M1 Pro: 200, M1 Max 400, M1 Ultra 800. Modern RTX 6000: ~1,600 or so. If we get a 1,200-1,500 GB/s bandwidth M7 variant in late 2027 with 512GB of RAM, that will be a very interesting chip. Tracking LLM size and performance improvements, I can imagine that being a sort of inflection point for local inference. I wonder what the power budget would be in desktop format.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others question the long-term viability of the AI-first strategy if consumer demand for integrated AI fails to materialize &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48681926&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s their backup plan if the AI world doesn&amp;#39;t pan out? What if it turns out people want base compute capability and lots of RAM for filestore cache and programs? Maybe this strategy works, even in that world. Remember when we all thought (were told we thought) the world was heading to 3D views of our 2D lived experience like a solid Cube of GUI we could rotate around and live inside? Well Apple took the simple 2D square pane of virtual desktops and .. made it a SONY strip. One variable:…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://newsroom.ibm.com/2026-06-25-ibm-debuts-worlds-first-sub-1-nanometer-chip-technology&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;IBM debuts sub-1 nanometer chip technology&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (newsroom.ibm.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48674967&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;392 points · 204 comments · by porridgeraisin&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IBM has unveiled the world’s first sub-1 nanometer chip technology, utilizing a 3D &amp;#34;nanostack&amp;#34; architecture to achieve nearly double the transistor density of its 2 nm predecessor while offering up to 50 percent more performance or 70 percent greater energy efficiency. &lt;a href=&quot;https://newsroom.ibm.com/2026-06-25-ibm-debuts-worlds-first-sub-1-nanometer-chip-technology&quot; title=&quot;Title: IBM Debuts World’s First Sub-1 Nanometer Chip Technology    URL Source: https://newsroom.ibm.com/2026-06-25-ibm-debuts-worlds-first-sub-1-nanometer-chip-technology    Published Time: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 02:57:58 GMT    Markdown Content:  Built with revolutionary “nanostack” 3D chip architecture, IBM’s sub-1 nm chip to propel semiconductor industry forward for the next decade    Jun 25, 2026    ![Image 1](https://newsroom.ibm.com/image/IBM-Research_Newsroom_Banner_4_Light+%281%29.jpg)    **YORKTOWN…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IBM’s announcement of &amp;#34;0.7 nm&amp;#34; technology has sparked debate over industry naming conventions, with critics arguing the label is a marketing abstraction rather than a physical measurement of chip features &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676608&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; logic technology can extend for the first time below the 1 nm node, advancing the era of angstrom-level scaling, where dimensions approach the size of individual atoms. While transistor nodes now refer to a generation of manufacturing technology versus an exact physical dimension, IBM’s 0.7 nm technology—also referred to as 7 angstroms—demonstrates how continued scaling remains possible. Continuing the well established trend of making bold claims about physical dimensions that have nothing to…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some defend these terms as a useful way to compare transistor density to older planar nodes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48678251&quot; title=&quot;Unlike marketing terms, &amp;#39;nm density&amp;#39; is actually useful measure. It describes density measure where you can compare it to planar transistors from the 28-nanometer (28 nm) node around 2010 to 2011 and before.  A &amp;#39;0.7 nm&amp;#39; node has equivalent transistor density as if we could have shrunk standard flat transistor node down to 0.7 nanometers.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others question how IBM will commercialize these breakthroughs given their shift toward a consulting-heavy business model &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676375&quot; title=&quot;How does IBM commercialize this? Do they license this out to fabs?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48677875&quot; title=&quot;The most surprising part for me is that IBM still somehow owns silicon labs, I was sure it&amp;#39;s effectively a consulting company by now&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676376&quot; title=&quot;IBM regularly announces silicon breakthroughs like this but I&amp;#39;m not aware of those ever becoming products. Is IBM mainly in the business of licensing their technology to big silicon manufacturers with stuff like this? Is it just marketing for their consulting business?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights the looming physical limits of Moore&amp;#39;s Law, as dimensions approach the scale of individual atoms and angstroms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48677268&quot; title=&quot;One of the images has &amp;#39;15 rows of Si atoms&amp;#39;. Is there a limit to how small things can go? A single atom? Is there a physical/molecular limit to Moore&amp;#39;s Law?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676759&quot; title=&quot;There are 3 orders of magnitude between nano (^-9) and pico (^-12).  An Angstrom is ^-10m.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48677360&quot; title=&quot;I mean, you can&amp;#39;t get smaller than an atom, there is some amount of plausibility of using individual atoms as at least the occasional computing element. Beyond that, engineering a quark-gluon plasma as a processor?  I&amp;#39;d watch that Star Trek episode.  (we might fantasize about stuff like that but we&amp;#39;re roughly monkeys smashing rocks together in a cave vs. building an iPhone sort of gap away from that kind of thing unless somebody has a really good idea)&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rozumem.xyz/posts/17&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Doorman&amp;#39;s Fallacy in action&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (rozumem.xyz)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48678495&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;238 points · &lt;strong&gt;310 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by rozumem&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author illustrates the &amp;#34;Doorman Fallacy&amp;#34; by describing how a restaurant&amp;#39;s transition from physical menus and staff-led payments to QR codes created technical friction, interrupted social engagement, and caused confusion during the final billing process for a large group. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rozumem.xyz/posts/17&quot; title=&quot;Title:     URL Source: https://rozumem.xyz/posts/17    Markdown Content:  [← back](https://rozumem.xyz/)    2026-06-25    last update: 2026-06-26    # The Doorman Fallacy In Action    I recently learned about the [Doorman Fallacy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rory_Sutherland_%28advertising_executive%29#Doorman_fallacy) and couldn&amp;#39;t help but connect it to an experience I had last weekend. The Doorman Fallacy is &amp;#39;the mistake of assuming technology can replace a human without consequence&amp;#39;.    This past…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#34;Doorman Fallacy&amp;#34; highlights how companies often cut human-centric services because their costs are easily measured while their value—such as hospitality and &amp;#34;warm fuzzies&amp;#34;—is difficult to quantify &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48680682&quot; title=&quot;I’d not heard of this fallacy* but it makes perfect sense.  Well executed human greeting is such a killer asset if you get it right.  There’s a few million years of genetic programming inside us all that responds unreasonably positively to hospitality.  If someone enters my home and is not drinking their desired beverage in under four minutes, I have brought shame on me and my family! I think we are all programmed to respond well to any courtesy, no matter how indirect.  When a computer game…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48683265&quot; title=&quot;I also hadn&amp;#39;t heard of it, but I feel like it&amp;#39;s kind of a corollary of the whole, &amp;#39;what&amp;#39;s measured is managed&amp;#39; idea or maybe the Streetlight effect ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streetlight_effect ). It&amp;#39;s easy to measure a doorman&amp;#39;s cost, but hard to measure their impact. Few, if any, guest are likely to mention the impact of a doorman on their stay except in the exceptional case. That means when budgets start to get tight (or an exec wants to drive the share price up), doormen become an easy…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters argue this shift effectively offloads labor to the consumer under the guise of convenience, allowing companies to absorb savings without lowering prices &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48679006&quot; title=&quot;What the article misses is that money is saved for the company by moving the work to the customer / end user. It&amp;#39;s the same thing with sending parcels, where I must now sit on my computer at home filling in a complicated online form and printing out my own labels.  This takes me like 30 minutes, but saves time and money for the Post Office (not for me!) There&amp;#39;s no downside for the company here, especially when they are monopolies so we have no choice.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48679192&quot; title=&quot;Don&amp;#39;t forget self check out at the grocery store. I don&amp;#39;t mind personally (I find ways to make it worth my while..) but it&amp;#39;s a version of the same thing. Shifting labor under the guise of convenience. Like all the other versions of this, the savings are absorbed by the company, not passed on to the consumer. It&amp;#39;s rare that the opposite happens.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48679294&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; that money is saved for the company by moving the work to the customer / end user. And somehow things are more expensive than ever. Self checkouts, order at the counter, bussing your own table, assembling your own furniture, filling out your or your pet’s medical history at a hospital, shipping labels (you mentioned this) and so much more. It’s a form of free labor that somehow society is okay with.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find certain technological replacements like handheld scanners or RFID checkouts to be genuine improvements &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48679341&quot; title=&quot;My supermarket has the handheld scanners and they are a game changer. They fit handily into the trolley if you want and you just scan stuff as you go. If you want 8 of something, you can just tap the item and increase the quantity, none of the having to scan each one and add it carefully to the bagging area, etc... And best of all, at the end you just scan a self checkout screen (and they have special ones as well with no bagging area and no queue, but you can use the normal ones if the queue…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others note that these digital transitions often introduce security vulnerabilities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48680915&quot; title=&quot;Aside re: restaurant technology: In a restaurant a year ago with &amp;#39;pay via your phone&amp;#39; service. Server gave us a receipt w/ a QR code. I scanned the code, copied the URL to my clipboard, and looked it over. There was a base64 blob on the URL. I decoded it (because Termux and I&amp;#39;m a nerd) and saw obvious parameters I could fuzz. I changed the check ID (incremented it), left the store ID alone, re-encoded it, and found I could access somebody else&amp;#39;s check. Not a super exciting vulnerability (since…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt; or fail to handle complex social tasks like splitting a bill &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48679480&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; But when 6 people simultaneously tried to pay their share of the bill, chaos ensued. I&amp;#39;m guessing the author has never worked as a server themselves... Is there any part of the world you can have a six top with individual checks when you didn&amp;#39;t tell them up front to split the bill? As an American this just seems obvious to me but maybe the expectation is different in Dubai.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/inkeep/open-knowledge&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: OpenKnowledge – open source AI-first alternative to Obsidian/Notion&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48675435&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;374 points · 171 comments · by engomez&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenKnowledge is a free, open-source WYSIWYG markdown editor for macOS and web that features native AI agent integrations, CRDT-based collaboration, and Git-backed versioning to provide an AI-first alternative to Notion and Obsidian. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/inkeep/open-knowledge&quot; title=&quot;Hi HN, Nick here. We’re launching OpenKnowledge (&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;openknowledge.ai&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;openknowledge.ai&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;), a “what you see is what you get” markdown editor that has direct integrations with Claude, Codex, and other agents. Available as MacOS app or Web UI+CLI. Fully free&amp;amp;#x2F;local and OSS.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;We built this because we wanted a Notion-like experience for writing and sharing markdown files across our team. Obsidian is the best alternative we…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While some users argue that Obsidian is already &amp;#34;AI-friendly&amp;#34; because it uses standard Markdown files that can be easily indexed by external tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48678686&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand how Obsidian, a collection of markdown files, isn&amp;#39;t already AI friendly. It&amp;#39;s hard for me to imagine a more AI-friendly but still usable way to organize your notes.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48678829&quot; title=&quot;This.  I just open the Obsidian folder (aka &amp;#39;vault&amp;#39;) in VS Code and BOOM, it is AI friendly.  I just hack on the .md files like I would code with Copilot.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, the developers of OpenKnowledge distinguish their project by integrating Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers and specialized &amp;#34;skills&amp;#34; directly into the application &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48678703&quot; title=&quot;What we did to go &amp;#39;beyond&amp;#39; is build in skills and an MCP server into the app, and auto-install those into e.g. Claude, Codex, and Cursor formats. Also added a web viewer so that e.g. Claude Desktop can open up the editor directly within it&amp;#39;s embedded web viewer.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48679087&quot; title=&quot;Neat, trying it out now. Are the Open Knowledge skills actually needed, if this is just markdown and folders? The skills are large, I&amp;#39;d prefer not filling up context.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant point of contention is the current platform limitation to macOS, with users expressing a strong desire for Linux, Android, and broader local LLM support &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48678347&quot; title=&quot;Fully local, but can&amp;#39;t integrate with any local LLM? I do think a fully OSS Obsidian-like that syncs natively is an impressive accomplishment, though the usefulness of this is limited with OSX being the only supported platform. If an Android app is in the works I&amp;#39;ll definitely follow the project!&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48678600&quot; title=&quot;Personally I just want to see more support for local LLMs. I haven&amp;#39;t been doing much coding lately but am interested in setting up Qwen 3.6 if I can obtain the hardware&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48678247&quot; title=&quot;macos only? shame.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. The developers responded by committing to better documentation for local model integration and exploring compatibility with alternative editors like Zed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48678512&quot; title=&quot;Got it. MCP Server and CLI is agent-agnostic, so should work with local models/harnesses, but we&amp;#39;ll look into more explicit docs around this. What IDE or harness do you use? We&amp;#39;ll take a look.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48678681&quot; title=&quot;Agree same. We&amp;#39;ll look into explicit guides and integrations with Zed // OpenCode as a starting point, they let you choose your model.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.cloudflare.com/oauth-for-all/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OAuth for all&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.cloudflare.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668033&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;380 points · 164 comments · by terryds&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudflare has launched self-managed OAuth for all customers, moving away from a restricted partner-only model to enable broader third-party integrations. The rollout followed a major upgrade of their underlying Hydra engine, which significantly improved API performance and security for developers building automated tools and SaaS applications. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.cloudflare.com/oauth-for-all/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Unlocking the Cloudflare app ecosystem with OAuth for all    URL Source: https://blog.cloudflare.com/oauth-for-all/    Published Time: 2026-06-24T14:00+08:00    Markdown Content:  ## Unlocking the Cloudflare app ecosystem with OAuth for all    2026-06-24    6 min read    ![Image 1](https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/zkvhlag99gkb/470YV3u8pJdiSjyhZl1Zro/12aaff16d7787082571eeee0d2b8217f/image1.png)    Cloudflare provides services that help run 20% of the web, but we don’t do it alone. Developers on our…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a sharp divide between users who value the security and centralized control of OAuth for enterprise environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48673621&quot; title=&quot;For enterprise, the ability to shut out a user with one click is the overriding security feature. I don’t know why anyone wants to use a federated identity to sign into things. Where did the messaging that it’s more secure come from, Google?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668578&quot; title=&quot;Do you understand what OAuth is? It’s like an API key but less likely to be abused. This is a good thing. It helps security in many ways and makes security flows more safe than carrying around a token.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt; and those who find its complexity frustrating compared to simple API keys &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668966&quot; title=&quot;Oauth and enterprise auth has to be the worst thing ever made, it might be the most confusing and frustrating part of dealing with the cloud. Even the AI tools took a year to just get basic Oauth working on headless systems without assuming you could open a browser. If they&amp;#39;re going to go down the auth rabbit hole with RBAC/IAM/Workload identities?/service accounts and all the trash the big cloud providers have, I just hope to god they leave in the simple shit for personal use. I just want a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48669133&quot; title=&quot;I am tempted to agree with you because I could never quite wrap up my head around it, but I never had to implement OAuth beyond a brief skim through the doc for my own understanding. I always thought this complexity was there for some good reason (security?).&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics express significant concerns regarding privacy, noting that providers can track every login &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48669148&quot; title=&quot;What I don&amp;#39;t understand is why OAuth is rarely talked about in a privacy context, however your OAuth provider knows all the sites you log into and when. It&amp;#39;s a privacy nightmare.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, and fear that Cloudflare’s expansion into identity services risks centralizing too much power &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48669700&quot; title=&quot;Classic Cloudflare, for all, works well, not too expensive... but, and consequently of all those positive attributes, positioning itself at the center of everything.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668429&quot; title=&quot;Cloudflare turning into a Cloud platform is undoing what it was really doing well: making small clouds and diy hosting manageable in the hostile web environment. Once their revenue from Cloud services overtakes their core offering, bye bye Cloudflare free and so on.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue OAuth is a safer alternative to static tokens &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668578&quot; title=&quot;Do you understand what OAuth is? It’s like an API key but less likely to be abused. This is a good thing. It helps security in many ways and makes security flows more safe than carrying around a token.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest self-hosted solutions like Keycloak to avoid the &amp;#34;auth rabbit hole&amp;#34; of major cloud providers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668966&quot; title=&quot;Oauth and enterprise auth has to be the worst thing ever made, it might be the most confusing and frustrating part of dealing with the cloud. Even the AI tools took a year to just get basic Oauth working on headless systems without assuming you could open a browser. If they&amp;#39;re going to go down the auth rabbit hole with RBAC/IAM/Workload identities?/service accounts and all the trash the big cloud providers have, I just hope to god they leave in the simple shit for personal use. I just want a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48670987&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Ory Enterprise License: Unlock enterprise-grade features like security SLAs for CVEs, SAML, B2B organizations, multi-tenancy, and better scalability.&amp;#39; [0] Or just stick with KeyCloak that offers a full self hosted product... [1] [0] https://github.com/ory [1] https://www.keycloak.org/&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.neowin.net/news/windows-10-quietly-gets-one-more-year-of-support-and-updates/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Windows 10 quietly gets one more year of support and updates&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (neowin.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48675369&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;251 points · 231 comments · by bundie&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am unable to summarize the news story because the provided text is a security verification page (CAPTCHA) and does not contain the actual content of the article. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.neowin.net/news/windows-10-quietly-gets-one-more-year-of-support-and-updates/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Just a moment...    URL Source: https://www.neowin.net/news/windows-10-quietly-gets-one-more-year-of-support-and-updates/    Warning: This page maybe requiring CAPTCHA, please make sure you are authorized to access this page.    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: Icon for www.neowin.net](https://www.neowin.net/favicon.ico)    ## www.neowin.net    ## Performing security verification    This website uses a security service to protect against malicious bots. This page is displayed while the website verifies…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users are divided on whether to migrate to Windows 10 IoT Enterprise LTSC for extended support through 2032, with some praising its stability while others warn of missing modern optimizations and the hassle of a full reinstallation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48675798&quot; title=&quot;Anyone who still needs to run Windows 10 for whatever reason should switch over to Windows 10 IoT Enterprise LTSC 2021 (version 21H2) which will continue to receive security updates up through 2032. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/release-health/rel...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48677682&quot; title=&quot;This is bad advice that is being repeated over and over by the so called tech influencers. You go to an older version that only got security updates so you will lack optimizations and features already in the current stable windows 10. And for the foreseeable future you gain nothing at all.  If one day the normal version acctually stops reviving security updates, it almost certainly will be possible to switch the update channel to LTSC and get the LTSC updates that way but for now this is not…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48677791&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; so you will lack optimizations and features already in the current stable windows 10 Windows gets worse with each update, so this is actually a plus.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics of Windows 11 highlight frustrations with forced Microsoft accounts, telemetry, and hardware requirements like TPM, though some suggest using third-party utilities to create &amp;#34;minimalist&amp;#34; installations that bypass these restrictions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676160&quot; title=&quot;What even is Microsoft&amp;#39;s strategy? Windows 11 requiring TPM, Secure Boot and being all react wasn&amp;#39;t great. Now we have a hardware shortage and ai in everything. I miss the time when it was &amp;#39;My computer&amp;#39; and not &amp;#39;This PC&amp;#39;. I just hope they keep Windows 10 around till 2030 and longer...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48675898&quot; title=&quot;You can get a completely minimalist Windows 11 by grabbing an ISO from Microsoft then reprocessing the ISO by feeding it into this utility: https://github.com/christitustech/winutil (Win11 Creator Tab) to get a NEW ISO which you then install. The end result is an extremely clean and stable Windows 11 installation. The resulting image can remove telemetry, bypass hardware requirement checks, and enable local account setup out of the box. Official docs: https://winutil.christitus.com/…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676350&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Windows 11 requiring TPM, Secure Boot and being all react wasn&amp;#39;t great. For me a bigger concern is that Windows 11 requires MS account, and making harder and harder to bypass it. This is a disrespect for my freedom and privacy. The hardware is not the biggest issue because it might catch up eventually. https://waspdev.com/articles/2026-03-12/i-ll-probably-never-...&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While Windows 11 offers superior features for specific hardware like OLED monitors and gaming, many argue these benefits are irrelevant for the average user who primarily needs a stable environment for web browsing and productivity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48678205&quot; title=&quot;Very untrue for gaming in particular. For example, if you have an OLED or mini-LED monitor, you really don’t want to be on Windows 10 and miss out on HDR. And sure, you can say “well nobody has an OLED monitor,” but I’d remind everyone that OLED displays have been pretty much standard on every gaming laptop mid-range and higher for a decent amount of time now. A lot of the focus for Windows 11 development has been gaming performance and feature improvements. Game developers are also less and…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48678392&quot; title=&quot;Most people are in fact not gamers. Like.. at all. And even those that are probably don&amp;#39;t own an OLED or mini-LED monitor. Most people just want a computer that does the word, the chrome and that&amp;#39;s about it.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. For those unable to switch to Linux due to legacy software dependencies, maintaining a clean Windows environment remains a priority &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676837&quot; title=&quot;Linux is free and less wasteful on resources on the other hand.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676883&quot; title=&quot;It is, and if you can switch, it’s highly recommended. I have some pretty bespoke old RS-232 Windows software that was an absolute disaster to get working under Debian with Wine a few years back, so I (and others) might still need to keep a copy of Windows around.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mullvad.net/en/why-privacy-matters/state-mass-surveillance&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Countries are competing to see which can carry out mass surveillance the best&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mullvad.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48672764&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;312 points · 123 comments · by Cider9986&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Democratic and authoritarian nations are increasingly employing mass surveillance, utilizing legal exemptions, data brokers, and advanced AI to monitor global communications and physical movements, which critics argue undermines fundamental human rights and the foundations of free societies. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mullvad.net/en/why-privacy-matters/state-mass-surveillance&quot; title=&quot;Title: Democratic and authoritarian countries are competing to see which of them can carry out mass surveillance most and best (worst).    URL Source: https://mullvad.net/en/why-privacy-matters/state-mass-surveillance    Markdown Content:  ## State mass surveillance    USA and their friends in the surveillance alliance Fourteen Eyes have demonstrated that they have the capacity, the desire and the experience to monitor who they want, when they want, anywhere in the world.    There are two types of mass…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a growing trend toward mandatory age verification and Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements on major platforms, with some predicting these measures will eventually reach sites like Hacker News &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48673326&quot; title=&quot;reddit started asking KYC yesterday. You (and me) can bitch all you want, but reddit has well prepared for us whining and being sad will change nothing. Mark my words: KYC will be required on HN in about two years. Not because dang will want it, but because that&amp;#39;s the direction the world is going to.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48673413&quot; title=&quot;You can become a customer on reddit by purchasing subscription. I did. I like reddit. Doesn&amp;#39;t matter. They want your passport.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users question the efficacy of surveillance in preventing terrorism &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48673108&quot; title=&quot;- does anyone have actual proof that surveillance does not effectively curb terrorism or something along those lines? - i keep seeing the same arguments everywhere &amp;#39;ThEy WaNt To CoNtRoL Us&amp;#39; etc - how do you propose catching terrorists then?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others point to Singapore as a successful model of a high-surveillance society where the population is conditioned to monitor one another &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48673759&quot; title=&quot;Spoiler alert : Singapore won the race years ago. Cameras everywhere, and mostly : the singaporian civilian population is educated to surveil peers so that they don&amp;#39;t commit incivilities. Here is an article about it : https://gcctvms.com/smart-city-surveillance-singapore-camera...&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant disagreement regarding the origins of these policies; while some attribute them to parental demands &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48672988&quot; title=&quot;Mass surveillance is bad, until I&amp;#39;m in charge of it. -- Parents demanding &amp;#39;age verification&amp;#39; laws&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others cite polling data showing broad public support for online safety reforms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48673347&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s not supported by the polling. &amp;gt;From everything you have seen and heard, do you support or oppose the recent rules requiring age verification to access websites that may contain pornographic material?* &amp;gt;80% support https://yougov.com/en-gb/articles/52693-how-have-britons-rea... &amp;gt;The Essential poll found majority support for a range reforms to improve online safety including: [...] enforcing age verifications for pornography and gambling sites (79%); enforcing age verification for social…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, or argue that users are being treated as products rather than customers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48673369&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s weird because... I&amp;#39;m not the customer on either Reddit or HN. I&amp;#39;m the product.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ziglang.org/devlog/2026/#2026-06-25&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Zig&amp;#39;s new bitCast semantics and LLVM back end improvements&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ziglang.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48673825&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;278 points · 144 comments · by kouosi&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Zig&amp;#39;s 2026 updates introduce a redesigned `@bitCast` based on logical bit layout, significant performance gains in the LLVM backend, a faster serialized build system, and major progress on the SPIR-V backend and incremental ELF linking. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ziglang.org/devlog/2026/#2026-06-25&quot; title=&quot;Title: Devlog ⚡ Zig Programming Language    URL Source: https://ziglang.org/devlog/2026/    Published Time: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 21:36:54 GMT    Markdown Content:  This page contains a curated list of recent changes to main branch Zig.    This page contains entries for the year 2026. Other years are available in [the Devlog archive page](https://ziglang.org/devlog/).    June 26, 2026    ## [SPIR-V Backend Progress](https://ziglang.org/devlog/2026/#2026-06-26)    Author: Ali Cheraghi    There’s quite a bit to cover.…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Zig&amp;#39;s shift to endian-agnostic `bitCast` semantics has sparked debate over whether the language is prioritizing high-level &amp;#34;logical&amp;#34; bit representations over low-level hardware expectations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48675241&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Consider, for instance, bitcasting a [2]u8 to a u16. Under the old semantics, the result of this operation depends on the target endian: on big-endian targets, the first array element became the 8 most significant bits, whereas on little-endian targets, the first array element became the 8 least significant bits. Under the new semantics, because we only care about logical bit representation (which is endian-agnostic), the operation behaves identically on every target: This is a huge mistake.…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48677893&quot; title=&quot;I am criticizing the part where they allowed [3]u8 to u24 bitCast in the first place. It doesn&amp;#39;t make sense logically as u24 is likely not 24 bits in any targets let alone portably on every target. Interpreting u24 like it is actually 24 bits sounds like programming in crazy land since it is not 24 bits in any relevant architecture afaik. They didn&amp;#39;t allow []u24 with a similar rationale as far as I can remember. I agree with this as someone programming at this level should be able to understand…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some critics argue that casting types like `&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48675833&quot; title=&quot;OT: I&amp;#39;m always surprised at how popular Zig discussions get here, or Youtube and other medias. Don&amp;#39;t get me wrong, I love Zig and I think it&amp;#39;s a great C replacement, but I&amp;#39;m very confused on why C3 or Odin rarely get any attention at all, despite being in the same C-replacement crowd. But still surprised at what Zig does better than these other projects? Is Andrew much better at marketing/promoting the language? He&amp;#39;s very hard to dislike.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;u8` to `u24` is &amp;#34;programming in crazy land&amp;#34; because such types lack native architectural layouts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48675241&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Consider, for instance, bitcasting a [2]u8 to a u16. Under the old semantics, the result of this operation depends on the target endian: on big-endian targets, the first array element became the 8 most significant bits, whereas on little-endian targets, the first array element became the 8 least significant bits. Under the new semantics, because we only care about logical bit representation (which is endian-agnostic), the operation behaves identically on every target: This is a huge mistake.…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48677893&quot; title=&quot;I am criticizing the part where they allowed [3]u8 to u24 bitCast in the first place. It doesn&amp;#39;t make sense logically as u24 is likely not 24 bits in any targets let alone portably on every target. Interpreting u24 like it is actually 24 bits sounds like programming in crazy land since it is not 24 bits in any relevant architecture afaik. They didn&amp;#39;t allow []u24 with a similar rationale as far as I can remember. I agree with this as someone programming at this level should be able to understand…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, proponents contend that arbitrary-width integers and packed structs are &amp;#34;killer features&amp;#34; for protocol creation and specialized hardware constraints &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676359&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Just don&amp;#39;t allow casting to u24, as it makes no sense unless you define u24 to be u32 sized as I think c standard does. The reason u32-&amp;gt;u24 casting must be well defined is because some hardware (e.g. many GPUs, microcontrollers) only have floating point multipliers. A 24 bit unsigned integer (stored in a 32 bit register) can be losslessly converted to a 32 bit float by the hardware, multiplied, then converted back. This is much faster than doing 32 bit multiplication in software, however, you…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48677072&quot; title=&quot;Zig is already great for this with ‘packed struct’ and arbitrary size ints. Allows for very clean protocol creation between systems with known properties. This is another great step in that direction.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48680484&quot; title=&quot;The ease of dealing with arbitrary bit-width integers and packed structs is actually one of the &amp;#39;killer features&amp;#39; for me in zig. Zig natively supports arbitrary bit-width integers, the ABI is defined and you could simply think it as a slice of the next larger backing integer. The[3]u8 to u24 bitCast will simply be backed by a 32bit int, using the same ABI.  As you have u1 - u65535, sometimes it can be multiple words. The 24 Bits (3 Bytes) [3]u8 to u24 example is exactly related to utf-8 that…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite disagreements on the abstraction&amp;#39;s complexity, users note that these changes simplify working with bit-packed binary headers and streaming data without manual bit-twiddling &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48675624&quot; title=&quot;This change + the existing packed struct logic will be great for working with bit packed binary headers w/o having to manually twiddle so much about the bit handling along the way.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48680484&quot; title=&quot;The ease of dealing with arbitrary bit-width integers and packed structs is actually one of the &amp;#39;killer features&amp;#39; for me in zig. Zig natively supports arbitrary bit-width integers, the ABI is defined and you could simply think it as a slice of the next larger backing integer. The[3]u8 to u24 bitCast will simply be backed by a 32bit int, using the same ABI.  As you have u1 - u65535, sometimes it can be multiple words. The 24 Bits (3 Bytes) [3]u8 to u24 example is exactly related to utf-8 that…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/06/military-branches-restore-flu-shot-requirement-after-virus-swept-through-base/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Military branches restore flu shot requirement after virus swept through base&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (arstechnica.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48679934&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;241 points · 160 comments · by tzs&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The U.S. Army, Navy, and Air Force have reinstated mandatory flu vaccinations for recruits after an outbreak at Lackland Air Force Base sickened over 200 people, following a brief period where Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had made the shots optional. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/06/military-branches-restore-flu-shot-requirement-after-virus-swept-through-base/&quot; title=&quot;Military branches restore flu shot requirement after virus swept through base    Branches received exceptions to Hegseth&amp;#39;s policy that made the shot optional.    [Skip to content](#main)  [Ars Technica home](https://arstechnica.com/)    Sections    [Forum](/civis/)[Subscribe](/subscribe/)[Search](/search/)    * [AI](https://arstechnica.com/ai/)  * [Biz &amp;amp; IT](https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/)  * [Cars](https://arstechnica.com/cars/)  * [Culture](https://arstechnica.com/culture/)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters argue that removing vaccine mandates ignores military history, where disease has historically caused more casualties than combat, and represents a failure of leadership that compromises readiness &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48681451&quot; title=&quot;In a sane administration, the complete and total lack of judgement that allowed vaccine mandates to go away should have led to an instant loss of confidence in sec def and anyone in the chain that didn&amp;#39;t raise concerns about that decision. Anyone that studies even the slightest amount of military history knows that disease used to kill more people in war than bullets until -very- recently. The fact that potentially the single most effective combat enabler is not taken seriously shows the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48680678&quot; title=&quot;I have a close friend who is an officer nearing twenty years. He has not had a tendency to criticize his job. However, he has been adamant that vaccines are incredibly important for the military and the policy changes have really angered him, specifically because of the damage it does to readiness.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest that &amp;#34;reality&amp;#34; must eventually be faced &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48680630&quot; title=&quot;It turns out eventually you have to deal with reality.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48680968&quot; title=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality-based_community&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the backlash was a predictable reaction to aggressive COVID-era policies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48681480&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s a double layer of irony here, where the people criticizing people of the ignorance of &amp;#39;unintended&amp;#39; consequences of vaccine fear will play defense for the unintended consequence of causing that fear by the extremely aggressive pushing of vaccine policies during covid&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; or was exploited by service members to avoid deployment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48680833&quot; title=&quot;The covid refusal also became a scam. If you refused then you couldnt be deployed. But it tool months to kick people out. So people who didnt want to deploy would refuse and then agree to get the shot at the last minute. So it kept them home for up to six months while thier buddies went overseas..&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a sharp disagreement over whether mandates are necessary for group-level protection &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48681783&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Anticipating all the downvotes Please don&amp;#39;t do this: &amp;#39;Please don&amp;#39;t comment about the voting on comments. It never does any good, and it makes boring reading&amp;#39; [1]. &amp;gt; flu vaccines are extremely ineffective They&amp;#39;re not. They&amp;#39;re not particularly effective for preventing flu in an individual. But at the group level, they have a clear and useful effect. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt; or if individuals should instead be forced to experience the consequences of disease to appreciate the value of vaccination &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48681275&quot; title=&quot;Hot take but we should let reality deal the blow. There&amp;#39;s so many things that people think is redundant and unnecessary but actually have an army of people and machination that are working tirelessly to curb it. Only to called bloat and the deep state. Vaccines should not be given automatically, because that causes people to not think about why they need it. They think that it is something is imposed on them. But if they always have to request it (and the request is quick and always given, or…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1475&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LuaJIT 3.0 proposed syntax extensions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667336&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;225 points · 151 comments · by phreddypharkus&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LuaJIT creator Mike Pall has opened an umbrella issue to discuss and document proposed syntax extensions for LuaJIT 3.0. The project aims to improve developer quality-of-life through proven, non-breaking features while maintaining backward compatibility and avoiding unnecessary syntactic complexity. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1475&quot; title=&quot;LuaJIT 3.0 Syntax Extensions · Issue #1475 · LuaJIT/LuaJIT    This is an umbrella issue for the LuaJIT 3.0 syntax extensions. The documentation will be evolved and updated in the first comment below. 1 Please feel free to discuss the choice, design and semant...    [Skip to content](#start-of-content)    ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [Sign in](/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FLuaJIT%2FLuaJIT%2Fissues%2F1475)    Appearance settings    * Platform      + AI CODE CREATION      - [GitHub…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The proposal to introduce C-style syntax like ternary operators and `&amp;amp;&amp;amp;`/`||` symbols has sparked significant pushback from users who prefer Lua’s traditional keyword-based readability and fear &amp;#34;redundant syntax&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667654&quot; title=&quot;Never will I understand ternary operators. As soon as you introduce it, some chuckle heads want to use them everywhere. Worse if the syntax allows nested ternarys. I guess it keeps the language open for code golfing, but it otherwise seems like redundant syntax that at best saves a few characters.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668579&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; For compatibility with other computer languages, the following classic Lua operators can be written in a more customary syntax: Why though?  What does changing `and` to `&amp;amp;&amp;amp;` actually achieve?  Were people confused? Changing the syntax seems very surface level.  It&amp;#39;s not actually fixing any problems, just making Lua no longer look like Lua.  It&amp;#39;s not going to help anyone write/learn Lua.  It will make everything more complicated as there are now two ways to do everything. This feels like…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668021&quot; title=&quot;Please don&amp;#39;t, inscrutable bitwise operators are an accident of the past even in systems languages, let alone in a scripting language. I&amp;#39;m not against infix operators for bitwise operations, just please spell them out with keywords rather than giving them sigils. Likewise, going from `and` and `or` to `&amp;amp;&amp;amp;` and `||` would be a dispiriting regression. This is something that Zig got right.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Many commenters suggest that if-then-else expressions are a superior alternative to the `? :` operator, especially for nesting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667775&quot; title=&quot;A comment &amp;lt; https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1475#issuecomment-47... &amp;gt; has already been made on the issue regarding the ternary operator, recommending `if x then y else z` over `x ? y : z`. This is exactly how it&amp;#39;s done with if-then-else expressions in Luau &amp;lt; https://luau.org/syntax/#if-then-else-expressions &amp;gt;, another language compatible with Lua, and makes it a ton easier to nest (especially with elseif) and I believe still easier to read than `y if x else z`.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667720&quot; title=&quot;That’s why “if” should just be an expression&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667907&quot; title=&quot;The ternary operator is easy to nest if you put each clause on a separate line. Then it looks just like nested if-then-else.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, there is a strong consensus that these breaking changes effectively transform LuaJIT into a new language, leading to suggestions that it should be renamed to reflect its departure from the Lua 5.1 standard &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667647&quot; title=&quot;Looks like LuaJIT is really going to fork away from Lua this time. After these changes, it won&amp;#39;t be a compatible Lua 5.1 implementation anymore, it will be a new language. So shouldn&amp;#39;t it have a new name?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667563&quot; title=&quot;So is LuaJIT resuming active development after a decade or so of only maintenance? Great! A lot of these changes make sense (although some of them are a bit too TIMTOWTDI for my taste) - but perhaps LuaJIT 3 would benefit from a change of name as well? Certainly with all these changes, it would be more like a separate language than merely a JIT-compiled version of Lua.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668189&quot; title=&quot;Tangently related but I’ve been deep in Lua recently working on a rust implementation that supports Lua 5.1-5.5 in one Rust Binary https://github.com/ianm199/omnilua . My ultimate goal was to support LuaJIT in Rust as well but this does not make it easier.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.interceptfund.com/p/ending-respiratory-infections&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ending respiratory infections&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.interceptfund.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667588&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;198 points · 134 comments · by EthanFantl&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Intercept is a new $500 million philanthropic initiative dedicated to eliminating respiratory infections by funding the development of broad-spectrum preventatives and advanced air-cleaning technologies, such as far-UVC light and enhanced filtration, to reduce the global health and economic burden of viruses like influenza and the common cold. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.interceptfund.com/p/ending-respiratory-infections&quot; title=&quot;Title: Ending respiratory infections    URL Source: https://blog.interceptfund.com/p/ending-respiratory-infections    Published Time: 2026-06-24T11:56:28+00:00    Markdown Content:  A century ago, waterborne diseases levied similar costs to those posed by respiratory viruses like colds and influenza today: endemic, periodically epidemic, and widely accepted as an inevitable feature of human life. Then, at the turn of the twentieth century, we decided they didn’t have to be. Pharmaceutical advances and…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on the role of philanthropy in public health, with some arguing that $500 million is insufficient compared to government spending on space or defense &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668528&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s sad we&amp;#39;re resorting to philanthropy to solve problems like this. $500M is chump change. NASA spent something like $300B in today&amp;#39;s money on the Apollo program, and Artemis has exceeded $90B already. I&amp;#39;m much more keen on never getting sick than prepping for Mars.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668628&quot; title=&quot;It’s 500m spend without guaranteed success.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668677&quot; title=&quot;The Iran war is going to cost us at least $200 billion dollars and you’re over here complaining about NASA spending?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, while others believe voluntary contributions represent an ideal pro-social model &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668818&quot; title=&quot;Everything should be voluntary philantrhopy! It seems like the ideal state if people are willing to do the pro-social thing by their own volition. Is it better if your child does their homework because they freely choose to, or is it better that they do it because you will beat them with a belt?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While the estimate that healthy people spend 5% of their lives sick was met with skepticism &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668079&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Healthy people spend roughly 15-25 days each year—about 5% of their lives—sick with respiratory infections like the common cold and influenza This seems completely unbelievable to me. Totally outside of my personal, professional, and family experience.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, parents of young children noted that frequent illness is a grueling reality for many families &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668369&quot; title=&quot;No kids eh? My oldest starting preschool was one of the worst times in my life. We were sick from august to december, then january to may. Dreadful. It got better. My youngest is 3 now and is ahead of where my oldest was due to having 2 older siblings importing illnesses for several years, and this year we finally were mostly not sick all school year. Which is to say, we were probably closer to the 15 days &amp;#39;materially sick&amp;#39; mark. I say materially sick to mean, definitely sick, though perhaps…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. The human stakes are highlighted by tragic anecdotes of loss due to common viruses &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667822&quot; title=&quot;My girlfriend died from human metapneumovirus at 30 years young. She had a weakened immune system from lymphangiomatosis, so something like metapneumovirus, which is a mild illness for most people, was a death sentence for her. I hope this fund is successful so nobody else ever has to go through what she did.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, though some users suggest simpler interventions like Vitamin D supplementation as a potential solution &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668708&quot; title=&quot;This happened to us too, until I heard the podcast about Vitamin D.  Nipped that in the bud almost immediately.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-06-24</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-06-24</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/world/china/anthropic-says-alibaba-illicitly-extracted-claude-ai-model-capabilities-2026-06-24/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (reuters.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664814&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;809 points · &lt;strong&gt;1304 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by htrp&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We couldn&amp;#39;t summarize this story. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/world/china/anthropic-says-alibaba-illicitly-extracted-claude-ai-model-capabilities-2026-06-24/&quot; title=&quot;We couldn&amp;#39;t fetch the text for this link.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chinese resellers are bypassing geographic and payment restrictions to offer Claude access at up to 90% below official rates by pooling accounts and utilizing payment fraud &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667495&quot; title=&quot;Here&amp;#39;s what is happening: Chinese resellers are offering Claude tokens at 70-90% below official Anthropic API prices. They achieve this by reselling capacity from pooled Claude Max accounts, payments fraud, and also reselling the model output &amp;amp; reasoning chains to various Chinese labs. They are subsidizing model access in exchange for user logs and reasoning traces, which they then sell as training data, allowing them to operate below cost. Claude and ChatGPT are both blocked in China. You need…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. This &amp;#34;token resale economy&amp;#34; allows Chinese labs to illicitly extract training data and reasoning traces from user logs to subsidize their own model development &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667495&quot; title=&quot;Here&amp;#39;s what is happening: Chinese resellers are offering Claude tokens at 70-90% below official Anthropic API prices. They achieve this by reselling capacity from pooled Claude Max accounts, payments fraud, and also reselling the model output &amp;amp; reasoning chains to various Chinese labs. They are subsidizing model access in exchange for user logs and reasoning traces, which they then sell as training data, allowing them to operate below cost. Claude and ChatGPT are both blocked in China. You need…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667458&quot; title=&quot;Distillation is fundamentally impossible to protect against. All you can do is slow them down. Change my view. Eventually these Chinese companies will release some extension like Honey, which will sit on top real, non-Chinese clients and send everything to China anyway. It&amp;#39;s over.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue this represents a competitive free market or a predictable outcome of training models on public data, others contend it is simple bootlegging that jeopardizes Anthropic&amp;#39;s business model &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668071&quot; title=&quot;This is great for competition! Chinese vendors offering a cheaper solution = what economics told me the free market was all about. I also learnt that Anthropic should get better at what they do if they want to compete. If not, somebody else will win. Or does this not apply to huge US corporations any more?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668163&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;This is great for competition! Chinese vendors offering a cheaper solution = what economics told me the free market was all about. Yeah, like all those Chinese bootleggers selling DVDs for a few dollars rather than $20. Free market! https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664814&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667447&quot; title=&quot;Reminds me a bit of the anecdote of Steve Jobs complaining about people ripping off the Mac GUI, in the mid to late 1980s, when he gave no public acknowledgement to the work done by Xerox on the Alto and Star operating system. &amp;#39;you&amp;#39;re trying to rip off what I&amp;#39;ve already ripped off!&amp;#39; Crawl the whole Internet to build a gargantuan sized LLM and then complain you&amp;#39;re being copied...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667521&quot; title=&quot;Thats pretty crazy. This kind of thing jeopardizes Claude Max.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. The situation has forced Anthropic to implement identity verification to combat the tens of thousands of bot accounts fueling this ecosystem &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667495&quot; title=&quot;Here&amp;#39;s what is happening: Chinese resellers are offering Claude tokens at 70-90% below official Anthropic API prices. They achieve this by reselling capacity from pooled Claude Max accounts, payments fraud, and also reselling the model output &amp;amp; reasoning chains to various Chinese labs. They are subsidizing model access in exchange for user logs and reasoning traces, which they then sell as training data, allowing them to operate below cost. Claude and ChatGPT are both blocked in China. You need…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://paolino.me/founding-a-company-in-germany/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Founding a company in Germany: €9600, 152 days and I still can&amp;#39;t send an invoice&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (paolino.me)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48658718&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;605 points · &lt;strong&gt;753 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by earcar&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A founder&amp;#39;s attempt to establish a company in Germany has cost over €9,600 and taken 152 days without the legal ability to issue invoices due to bureaucratic delays, complex multi-entity requirements, and a slow VAT registration process. &lt;a href=&quot;https://paolino.me/founding-a-company-in-germany/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Founding a Company in Germany: €9,600, 152 Days, and I Still Can&amp;#39;t Send an Invoice    URL Source: https://paolino.me/founding-a-company-in-germany/    Published Time: 2026-06-24T00:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  I started founding my second company in Germany in late January. It is now late June.    In that time, the state, two courts, a notary, a law firm, a tax firm, and software vendors have all found a way to bill me. Every single one of them, on time.    I have spent more than 9,600 euros…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Founding a company in Germany is criticized for its extreme bureaucracy, high costs, and slow processing times, particularly when choosing complex structures like the GmbH &amp;amp; Co. KG &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48659806&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Which leaves the only real question. Why 25,000 at all? It is my company and my risk. If I want to start with nothing, that is my call, not a toll the state collects before it will let me try. And the cheap door has a price of its own: to some clients, “UG” reads as “not serious,” and they would rather deal with a GmbH. The structure built to let me in quietly marks me for using it. The 25,000 is there to make sure you can cover some liability. If you really wanted &amp;#39;your company and your…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48659368&quot; title=&quot;Germany is one of the worst countries when it comes to bureaucracy nothing is fast here if you go the legal path and stay within the law (which is mostly for small people big players have different ways) and as you see everything costs a lot so if you are founding a pure online business do yourself a favor and incorporate somewhere else and if you still live in Germany look into licensing or subcontracting yourself to your company in another country it&amp;#39;s way more flexible and you probably have…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48658917&quot; title=&quot;For information: GmbH &amp;amp; Co. KG is one of the most complicated forms an company can be founded, the same goes if the inner company is an UG.  Many things have to be done twice.  The only good thing is that an investor or an owner are not liable with their private money.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the €25,000 capital requirement for a GmbH ensures liability protection and professional credibility, others point out that the US LLC model allows for nearly instant, low-cost formation without such upfront assets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48659806&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Which leaves the only real question. Why 25,000 at all? It is my company and my risk. If I want to start with nothing, that is my call, not a toll the state collects before it will let me try. And the cheap door has a price of its own: to some clients, “UG” reads as “not serious,” and they would rather deal with a GmbH. The structure built to let me in quietly marks me for using it. The 25,000 is there to make sure you can cover some liability. If you really wanted &amp;#39;your company and your…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48660094&quot; title=&quot;They are jealous of the US system where you can create an LLC in one hour for $200, and by the next day be doing business with all your personal assets isolated.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48660347&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; A company that starts with nothing wouldn&amp;#39;t be a GmbH (limited liability company), it would be a GoH (company without liability), and there&amp;#39;s a good reason why those don&amp;#39;t exist... Those do exist in other countries. An LLC in the USA does not generally need to have a certain amount of assets. Such a company is more or less without liability until it has some assets; the worst case for its owners when it comes to a routine business debt is shutting down the company. Exceptions are possible in…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. This disparity highlights a fundamental cultural divide: the German system prioritizes creditor protection and debt certainty, whereas the US system accepts a higher risk of unpaid debts to foster entrepreneurship &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48660352&quot; title=&quot;The US system is built to support entrepreneurship while the EU system broadly is to support the consumer and employee. The US will never be able to match the EU&amp;#39;s consumer and employee protections and the EU will never be able to match the US&amp;#39;s ease of doing business, because to have one you have to fundamentally give in on the other. Depending on who you ask, one system is wildly better than the other, but at the end of they day they are just different systems with different tradeoffs.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48660347&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; A company that starts with nothing wouldn&amp;#39;t be a GmbH (limited liability company), it would be a GoH (company without liability), and there&amp;#39;s a good reason why those don&amp;#39;t exist... Those do exist in other countries. An LLC in the USA does not generally need to have a certain amount of assets. Such a company is more or less without liability until it has some assets; the worst case for its owners when it comes to a routine business debt is shutting down the company. Exceptions are possible in…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48660570&quot; title=&quot;Not quite. In the US this condition is handled at the back end. Running a corporation or LLC without sufficient capitalization can be grounds for piercing the liability shield in a lawsuit.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. However, experiences vary across Europe, with countries like the Netherlands and Sweden offering much faster incorporation processes than Germany &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48659146&quot; title=&quot;Before Europe gets lumped in as one country, founding a company in Netherlands and Sweden, speaking from personal experience, is a breeze. Although Sweden is a bit strange in the fact that banks have as much equal say as the government authority does in you starting a company, and if they don&amp;#39;t want you as a customer, they can simply deny the right for your company to start!&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/24/openai-unveils-its-first-custom-chip-built-by-broadcom/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OpenAI unveils its first custom chip, built by Broadcom&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techcrunch.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663324&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;824 points · 468 comments · by jamdesk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI has partnered with Broadcom to unveil its first custom-designed AI inference chip, known as Jalapeno, to enhance its infrastructure and reduce reliance on external hardware providers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/24/openai-unveils-its-first-custom-chip-built-by-broadcom/&quot; title=&quot;Announcement: &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;openai.com&amp;amp;#x2F;index&amp;amp;#x2F;openai-broadcom-jalapeno-inference-chip&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;openai.com&amp;amp;#x2F;index&amp;amp;#x2F;openai-broadcom-jalapeno-inference-...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;decrypt.co&amp;amp;#x2F;371971&amp;amp;#x2F;openai-broadcom-jalapeno-first-custom-ai-chip&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;decrypt.co&amp;amp;#x2F;371971&amp;amp;#x2F;openai-broadcom-jalapeno-first-cus...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI’s nine-month development timeline for its custom chip has sparked debate over whether the &amp;#34;design to production&amp;#34; claim represents a breakthrough in AI-assisted engineering or standard industry practice for a large 3nm chip &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663501&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Developed from design to production in nine months, accelerated by OpenAI’s models &amp;gt; the use of OpenAI models to accelerate parts of the design and optimization process. I wish there was more about this. As is I kind of have to assume that this is just meaningless marketing, like saying development was accelerated by Microsoft Office or their 5k LG Ultrafine 40-inch monitors. Like, if this was as big a deal as it kind of vaguely implies, they would be making a bigger deal of it, right?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664155&quot; title=&quot;Chip CEO here. It really depends on what &amp;#39;design&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;production&amp;#39; means. Does &amp;#39;design&amp;#39; mean that the design was complete? Does &amp;#39;production&amp;#39; mean the beginning of production, i.e. tapeout? If measuring from RTL-freeze to tapeout, this is a fairly typical (even somewhat unimpressive) timeline (accounting for some unexpected issues) for a large, complex 3nm chip. If measuring from concept (no RTL at all, block diagram of architecture) to tapeout, this is an amazing timeline. The truth is probably…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that existing LLMs are already highly capable of assisting with hardware description languages and verification &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663863&quot; title=&quot;The hardware description languages (HDL) used in chip development are like programming languages. The existing models understand them and can do a lot with them. You don’t need to have separate, specialty models designed for this work to use LLMs in chip design workflows. Design verification also involves a lot of traditional programming which benefits from LLMs. So it’s not meaningless at all. You could download some of the open source chip design software today and the LLMs could even help…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others remain skeptical of the marketing claims, noting that current models still struggle with basic physical design tasks like trace routing and header spacing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663624&quot; title=&quot;Right. There are two possible meanings and shades in-between: 1) OpenAI genuinely have AI technologies that can improve chip design (bold, unlikely claim, needs evidence) 2) OpenAI designed test/verification models and kernels that could be run on the simulated hardware to test its performance As you and others have said, it&amp;#39;s hard to trust when they are happy to write something that could easily only mean the latter but sounds like the former.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664174&quot; title=&quot;I tried making a button using Claude entirely (including the 3D printed enclosure) and it effed up pretty hard with the traces and the header spacing.  The project was a big red arcade button that plays the &amp;#39;ah-my-groin.mp3&amp;#39; when pushed (from Simpsons).  It did cool work on saving battery life, and the 3d enclosure was awesome, but yeah, I&amp;#39;m convinced I&amp;#39;d have to do another version or two of the custom chip until it came back right.  I used a Blender MCP for the 3d modeling.  I used a KiCAD MCP…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, there is significant interest in the efficiency of &amp;#34;burning&amp;#34; models directly into silicon, though critics worry such specialized hardware may become obsolete before achieving a return on investment due to the rapid pace of architectural breakthroughs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663774&quot; title=&quot;This is very cool to see - seems like soooo much efficiency waiting to be unlocked at the chip level. What&amp;#39;s everyone think of Taalas? They&amp;#39;re actually burning the LLM model into the silicon, with some onboard memory for fine-tuning. They claim huge cost / latency wins. Super fast demo live at: https://chatjimmy.ai/ https://taalas.com/ https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1r9frzk/taalas...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664999&quot; title=&quot;I wanna see an inference chip where the weights are part of the rom of the chip. There would be 1 multiplier per weight (and since they&amp;#39;re constant, the whole thing turns into a bunch of simple adders), and the total pipelined system throughput would be one token per clock cycle. That means you can probably have millions of users simultaneously using a single bit of silicon, with perhaps 500 million tokens per second coming out the output bus. Downside is this chip would be huuuuge - a whole…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664134&quot; title=&quot;With the pace of AI, and with AI helping to pave the way for faster/better AI, I keep wondering if hardware like this will become obsolete well before it has a meaningful ROI.  Huge AI models can be run with less resources already through quantization and offloading, but that&amp;#39;s just the beginning.    One day, maybe not far from now, a breakthrough will allow huge LLMs (say 200B in size) to run well on an old 5 year old Dell desktop.  Think that&amp;#39;s crazy?  Look at the size of the first hard…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663864&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;d be cool to see more of this type of thing, but I have to imagine the ability for it to be updated to a brand-new model as new models come out is limited. If that is the case, it&amp;#39;s going to be an extremely hard sell.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bunny.net/blog/were-making-bunny-dns-free/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;We’re making Bunny DNS free&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (bunny.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48657030&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;921 points · 268 comments · by dabinat&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bunny.net has eliminated DNS query fees and now offers free hosting for up to 500 domains per account, integrating advanced routing, security, and CDN features into a single, no-cost entry point for its global infrastructure. &lt;a href=&quot;https://bunny.net/blog/were-making-bunny-dns-free/&quot; title=&quot;Title: We’re making Bunny DNS free    URL Source: https://bunny.net/blog/were-making-bunny-dns-free/    Published Time: 2026-06-24T05:58:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  At bunny.net, our mission has always been ambitious but focused: **help make the internet hop faster.**    To do that, we’ve built a massive global network spanning 119 locations and counting. Today, this network powers over 1.5 million websites and consistently delivers some of the fastest content delivery around the globe. But while…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bunny.net&amp;#39;s move to offer free DNS hosting for up to 500 domains is praised as a competitive European alternative to US providers like Cloudflare &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48657557&quot; title=&quot;Kudos to the BunnyNet team! I&amp;#39;ve always looked for a EU based alternative to Cloudflare; not because I didn&amp;#39;t like them, I still support Cloudflare and they&amp;#39;re a great company, but pushing for and testing EU services is important particularly in the light of recent developments in EU-US geopolitics. The problem is that many European companies aren&amp;#39;t as competitive as their US counterpart. Consider Hetzner as an example: how can you imagine being competitive with US cloud providers (AWS, Azure,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48657479&quot; title=&quot;It sounds like they made it free for customers for up to 500 domains. It also sounds like they were charging for DNS resolution before? Or is it DNS hosting? &amp;gt;So, we’ve eliminated DNS query fees entirely. &amp;gt; Bunny DNS no longer charges for DNS queries and includes free DNS hosting for up to 500 domains per account. There are no query limits, no per-request billing, and no critical features hidden behind enterprise plans. (Yes, that includes smart records and health monitoring too.) &amp;gt;As with all…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users appreciate the platform&amp;#39;s prepaid model as a safeguard against unexpected billing spikes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48659454&quot; title=&quot;You wouldn’t be charged thousands because the service is pre-paid. Your websites will be suspended once the balance runs out, but you can re-establish them once you add more balance. AFAIK is the only provider in which you can have functional billing limits and not just alerts that still depend on you reacting on them in time.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others criticize the company for poor customer support and a lack of notifications when account credits run low &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48658826&quot; title=&quot;They are competitive price wise, but less competent human wise. Their lack of user care shows when you start talking to support. I&amp;#39;ve never had this experience with an US company (except the US giants) where support basically gives me an &amp;#39;it is what it is&amp;#39;. The most recent that really put the cherry on top. I was planning on dropping them when running out of prepaid credits. ALL SaaS software I&amp;#39;ve used before that had a top up option would notify me when my credits where about to run out. Bunny…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also highlights a debate over European competitiveness, with users disagreeing on whether Hetzner&amp;#39;s recent price increases have compromised its status as a high-value provider &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48657617&quot; title=&quot;Well that&amp;#39;s a strange way of expressing competitiveness when Hetzner is still vastly cheaper than those 3 cloud providers, despite those cost increases.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48657677&quot; title=&quot;Yes Hetzner is still vastly cheaper option but there are better options now compared to hetzner and the issue is the way that they handled the pricing. Its just simply unsustainable and burns a lot of trust/good will if you increase your prices 3x in such a short period of time Trust me when I say this but Hetzner really belonged in its category previously. I had scoured almost everything and nothing could provide the scale at price Hetzner did back then but now I would say that its simply not…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48657975&quot; title=&quot;Are you a Hetzner customer? I&amp;#39;m a Hetzner customer, and my prices did not increase by 3x (it was more like 1.25x) and the price increase was communicated months in advance and several times. I am running stuff on their older infra, so maybe they handled it differently? When hardwares price go up at least 4x for storage and ram, I don&amp;#39;t see how you can avoid price increases and they are still one of the cheaper/cheapest options for what I need.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/liquid-cooling-ai-factories/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;45°C cooling design cuts data center water use to near zero&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blogs.nvidia.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48660178&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;484 points · 425 comments · by nitin_flanker&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NVIDIA’s new Rubin AI servers utilize a 100% liquid-cooling design that operates with coolant up to 45°C, enabling closed-loop systems that can eliminate water consumption and significantly reduce energy use by operating without mechanical chillers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/liquid-cooling-ai-factories/&quot; title=&quot;Hotter Than a Hot Tub: The 45°C Breakthrough to Cool AI’s Biggest Machines    NVIDIA’s latest AI servers can run on coolant warmer than a hot tub — and that counterintuitive choice is one of the biggest efficiency leaps in data center history.    ![country_code](https://www.nvidia.com/content/dam/1x1-00000000.png)    [Skip to content](#primary)    # Hotter Than a Hot Tub: The 45°C Breakthrough to Cool AI’s Biggest Machines    NVIDIA’s latest AI servers can run on coolant warmer than a hot tub — and that…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary innovation in this design is the transition from hybrid cooling to fully liquid-cooled servers, where every component is attached to a water-cooled block rather than relying on air-cooled heat sinks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48666419&quot; title=&quot;Maybe I&amp;#39;m being dumb, but I don&amp;#39;t understand what the innovation is here. I get that they&amp;#39;re using liquid coolant at higher than usual temperatures, but why couldn&amp;#39;t they do that before? Most of the comparison in the article is for air cooled datacenters but what about other liquid cooled ones? Surely in all the previous datacenters that have been designed there has been someone doing the math and determining what temperature things need to run at, how much energy it will use, how much heat it…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48666702&quot; title=&quot;The &amp;#39;innovation&amp;#39; is that everything is now attached to a watercooled block. The rest is marketing: The Cray supercomputer were fluid cooled back in the 1980&amp;#39;s, the entire board had an inert liquid flowing across it.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. This shift enables higher operating temperatures that could facilitate district heating for local communities, potentially turning data centers into valuable heat sources rather than just industrial neighbors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48661501&quot; title=&quot;This opens up an interesting synergy: district heating. 45C is low but not unworkable for a district heating loop, and a data center might be able to make a nice pitch to a community if the data center offers to provide heat to a district heating system for free.  This brings the value to the local community of a nearby datacenter up from near zero to potentially a few million dollars per year. Summer is still an issue, but fun solutions are possible. With the right geology, I think it’s…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663711&quot; title=&quot;I’ve been to datacenters, but not the huuuge ones people seem to talk about in the context of AI. They are noisy inside (due to air cooling, which is largely avoided by the tech in the OP), but they’re entirely unremarkable outside compared to any other commercial or industrial building.  Computers are not inherently loud, nor is power conversion. Power plants are all over, even in populated areas. They’re not so bad either (except perhaps coal). There is no fundamental reason that datacenters…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users remain skeptical of the noise and property value impacts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48661899&quot; title=&quot;Do you live near a datacenter? Property value goes down, constant humming.. the way we heat up the earth right now, i don&amp;#39;t think you have to worry about heating&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest this technology could make space-based data centers more viable by addressing thermal management, though critics argue that radiative cooling in space remains a fundamental bottleneck &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48662630&quot; title=&quot;This is also the type of thing that makes space based data centers more viable. I was previously more skeptical on the concept but have come around. I do think ground based centers will have better economics when they can be built though, and this addresses noise and water complaints which are the big 2 regional complaints. It seems like lots of bottlenecks are getting solved quickly, except for maybe memory.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663137&quot; title=&quot;How does that change the calculus for space datacenters? There is still no reasons or benefits to having them in space. You still have to rely solely on radiative cooling. That doesn’t solve any of the maintenance problems.  Space datacenters is a really dumb and unrealistic idea Musk is talking about to hype his companies, it’s not meant to actually be done. Anything in space is more expensive and way harder to do, for a datacenter there is no benefit. We aren’t lacking places where to have…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, commenters clarified that traditional data centers consume vast amounts of water through evaporative cooling, a process this closed-loop design aims to eliminate &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48666413&quot; title=&quot;I never looked into this, but why would a datacenter consume water for cooling in the first place? Sure, they use some. But just like you fill up the cooling loop in a car, once it is there it just circulates between the heat source and radiators and/or heat exchangers, with perhaps some minimal top off needed (since flexible tubing isn&amp;#39;t 100% water proof). Or are they for some unfathomable reason using evaporative cooling in data centers?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/2069799283369345247&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;There are a few things that I look back on as my mistakes in the early days&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48661825&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;568 points · 278 comments · by shadowtree&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;John Carmack reflects on his early career, identifying his failure to adopt C++ and his initial dismissal of structural programming as significant technical mistakes. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/2069799283369345247&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;ID_AA_Carmack&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2069799283369345247&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;ID_AA_Carmack&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2069799283369345247&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;John Carmack’s reflections on his early career sparked a debate over the &amp;#34;psycho energy&amp;#34; of tech founders, with some arguing that such intensity is a necessary driver of civilizational progress &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48662262&quot; title=&quot;Young energy shouldn’t be apologized. Apparently Bill Gates had that psycho energy too, Jobs and many others too.  On a civilizational scale it seems like a net benefit that young, eager and driven people give a bit more than they wanted to in retrospect. It do indeed change things for the rest of us.  The patriotic call of armed forces has been driven by this for millennia. At least Carmack and Co. chose their own missions, most soldiers are not so lucky.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt; while others contend that the industry&amp;#39;s refusal to learn from past leadership blunders leads to avoidable burnout &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48662129&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I pushed everyone too hard. I didn’t appreciate how maturing companies need more slack, and that running people at startup intensity constantly will wear them out. Sounds like wisdom many companies might consider...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48662398&quot; title=&quot;Wisdom is not appreciated in our industry. Everyone in tech with a modicum of status or power thinks they got there because they&amp;#39;re smarter than everyone else and there is nothing of value to be learned from others. Thus, our leaders blunder in to the same mistakes everyone else is making over and over again. We never learn.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663100&quot; title=&quot;This somehow resonates with me and I feel this is one of the negative side effects of a CS/Maths dominated culture and mindset that strongly emphasizes intellectual achievement, but hasn’t yet matured enough to appreciate the more messy and irrational parts of our existence.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters discussed the technical evolution of id Software, noting that while Carmack’s push for technological dominance defined the era, it created a difficult environment where level designers were unfairly expected to be master visual artists &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48662197&quot; title=&quot;I agree with one of the comments: &amp;#39;&amp;#39;Coulda been Doom++&amp;#39; hides how everyone wanted the leap back then.&amp;#39; Doom++ was already well under way in the form of Ken Silverman&amp;#39;s Build engine.  Duke Nukem 3D beat Quake to market by ~6 months as I recall.  A shorter timeline on the latter would have put them in direct competition with each other, damaging both. It was Carmack&amp;#39;s job to assert technological dominance and give the industry its next generation of game engines.  He did just that, and shouldn&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664024&quot; title=&quot;The rest of the context leading up to &amp;#39;Sorry, Sandy&amp;#39; has me a little confused, can anybody who knows more explain this bit? &amp;gt; One real problem that I don’t accept the blame for is that we were insisting that level designers be not just game designers, but also have strong visual design esthetics. They needed to make things that not only played well, but looked awesome, and it got more challenging as the technology provided a richer palette. Romero covered that well, which set our company…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users feel the studio&amp;#39;s creative peak ended with *Quake*, others defend later titles like *Doom 3* as being years ahead of their time in animation and interactive world-building &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48662154&quot; title=&quot;Quake III Arena was pretty entertaining. Doesn&amp;#39;t seem like it came from a company that had been ruined for years. I definitely noticed something around the Doom 3 release many years after Quake III Arena. The new game just didn&amp;#39;t seem to have the same industry pushing, genre changing energy. Or maybe I was just older and had moved on, and didn&amp;#39;t care as much.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48662431&quot; title=&quot;In the original thread Carmack was replying to, Sandy Petersen said Q3 was the only other great game they produced after that: https://xcancel.com/SandyofCthulhu/status/206959226489744192... Honestly I think Doom is where it came together the best, Quake was technically better (of course) but it was not a better game.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48662402&quot; title=&quot;Doom 3 was pretty huge of a step forward in many ways and had no competition for being SOTA except for Far Cry (1). I remember that summer as it was when I had my first job and I saved up to buy a GPU. Not just graphics but character acting and animation, interactive world elements, deliberately dramatic scenarios in the levels (Half Life pioneered this, but Doom3 had a lot of really good ones). It was years ahead of what was on consoles at the time.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.slate.auto/en&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Slate EV truck starts at $24,950&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (slate.auto)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48659451&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;308 points · &lt;strong&gt;477 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by cobri&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Slate has launched the &amp;#34;Blank Slate,&amp;#34; a highly customizable electric vehicle starting at $24,950 that can be configured as a two-seat pickup, a five-seat SUV, or a fastback. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.slate.auto/en&quot; title=&quot;Title: Slate    URL Source: https://www.slate.auto/en    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1](https://images.ctfassets.net/20dhmw20vttc/5ligDlmhxot7MJfiOeL9jG/9090b05177e4fc245d78bede6ba54162/26102SLATE_EXPLODED-HERO_v011_1400x800.jpg?fm=webp&amp;amp;w=3840&amp;amp;q=75)    ## THE MOST AFFORDABLE    TRUCK    The Blank Slate has the essentials from Whatever else you add—wraps, accessories, you name it—is entirely up to you.    ## THE MOST AFFORDABLE    TRUCK    The Blank Slate has the essentials from Whatever else you add—wraps,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the Slate EV&amp;#39;s $24,950 starting price is notable, users point out that common options quickly push the cost toward $35,000, leading to a debate over whether the vehicle is truly &amp;#34;inexpensive&amp;#34; relative to median incomes and established gas competitors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48659662&quot; title=&quot;Just built a &amp;#39;hatchback&amp;#39; Slate with what I guess will be common options (speakers, wheel upgrade, spare wheel carrier, and a few other odds and ends) and it came to $35k.  So, still pretty inexpensive, but also getting close to some existing EV sedans that are known entities and have pretty decent interiors. So, I&amp;#39;m not totally sold on these, but not not sold either.  Need to see one in person, I think.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48660446&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; still pretty inexpensive Can we stop being so out of touch and/or deluding ourselves to believe $35k is “pretty inexpensive” for people not living in a bubble; whether that is the Americas bubble or the tech bubble within the bubble or the urban bubble within that; let alone for a tiny two seater electric truck that has a 200 mile range. The 45th percentile, i.e., the bottom 90% have a median income of roughly $40,000. $35,000 for a enclosed covered or even hatchback type mini SUV is not…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48660648&quot; title=&quot;Compared to gas cars: Kia K4 hatchback is $26k with a lot more creature-comforts.  Gets 34mpg, so if $6/gal gas is here to stay that&amp;#39;s $0.17 per mile of fuel costs.  My EV gets almost exactly 4miles/kW average and I pay $0.21 per kW so that&amp;#39;s about $0.05 per mile. So $0.12 per mile saved in fuel costs implies about 80k miles for break-even. This excludes costs of servicing, which should be higher on the gas car. [edit typo&amp;#39;d an extra 0 it&amp;#39;s 80k miles for break-even] [edit2] After looking up my…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics highlight technical shortcomings such as a modest 200-mile range and older 400V charging architecture, though others note this range is standard for European markets and suitable for city use &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48659714&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s at the second to last page where it says it&amp;#39;s an EV. I didn&amp;#39;t know and had to scroll down. Also there is no mention of range on one charge, which I think is a miss. The range (especially for an EV) must be on the landing page. The modular design is cool though.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48659784&quot; title=&quot;Good criticism.  It looks like the car&amp;#39;s EV tech is average at best; definitely not outstanding.  That&amp;#39;s probably why they don&amp;#39;t advertise it strongly, and also probably a big factor in why it&amp;#39;s so cheap. They list some details on the Specs page[1].  They quote 200 miles of range, which is not great especially for a small car.  They list a 20-80 charge time of 30 minutes so it&amp;#39;s probably a 400V architecture, which is becoming outdated as 800V architectures and chargers exist now. Seems like a…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48659868&quot; title=&quot;That range is typical for European mass-market EV cars.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these concerns, the modular design and DIY-friendly color wrap system are praised as unique features that could drive brand loyalty and personalization &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48659761&quot; title=&quot;The color options are a much bigger deal than I think many people realize.  It&amp;#39;s been too many years since I saw the studies so I have no hope of being able to cite it, but in a marketing class in college I remember reading about how much people value picking a color they really like, that they feel matches their personality.  It increases satisfaction, significantly reduces the cognitive dissonance (aka &amp;#39;buyers remorse&amp;#39;) that usually accompanies a major purchase, and increases identity sharing…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48659615&quot; title=&quot;I don’t care that it’s EV. I’m just stoked that they’re making an actually modular system like this. I don’t know why it’s not possible with other cars.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48659970&quot; title=&quot;AFAIK there&amp;#39;s actually only one color and you can wrap it.  The wrap kits are supposed to be DIY friendly so you can change it yourself when you want a new color.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.wired.com/story/meta-pauses-employee-tracking-program-following-internal-security-breach/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Meta Pauses Employee-Tracking Program Following Internal Data Leak&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (wired.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48653575&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;340 points · 268 comments · by 1vuio0pswjnm7&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meta has paused its Model Compatibility Initiative, a tool that tracks employee mouse movements and keystrokes to train AI, after an internal security lapse exposed the collected data to other workers within the company. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.wired.com/story/meta-pauses-employee-tracking-program-following-internal-security-breach/&quot; title=&quot;Meta Pauses Employee-Tracking Program Following Internal Data Leak    The move comes after the company left potentially sensitive data from the initiative exposed internally.    [Skip to main content](#main-content)    [We&amp;#39;re Tracking Amazon Prime Day Live](https://www.wired.com/live/amazon-prime-day-live-tracker-july-24-2026/)    [Shop Now](https://www.wired.com/live/amazon-prime-day-live-tracker-july-24-2026/)    Menu    [WIRED](/)    [SECURITY](/category/security/)    [POLITICS](/category/politics/)    [THE…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on a sharp divide between those who view Meta as a &amp;#34;shameless&amp;#34; company whose products negatively impact society &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48654186&quot; title=&quot;Meta continuing to be the most shameless (and shameful to work for) company around. I can&amp;#39;t think of a single product of theirs that hasn&amp;#39;t made the world a markedly worse place. Even their recent hardware foray is managing to find a way to ruin trust in everyday interactions (guys filming drunk girls with Ray Bans, surveillance, etc.). Have several friends at the more &amp;#39;thoughtful&amp;#39; frontier labs that bin meta applicants straight to the trash for this very reason.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt; and those who argue that tracking employee telemetry on corporate devices is a standard, morally acceptable business practice &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48654814&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ll be the contrarian here. I think the program was legal and morally fine. Take into account that these are corporate computers, and the tracking is of work that the company is paying for, so the telemetry, which is highly valuable for analysis and automation, is rightfully theirs. I also don&amp;#39;t think that the purpose of the move was to manage workers and see if they slack off, it was to gather training data, but even if it were, I think that&amp;#39;s normal? In any other job managers can, and are…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users highlight Meta&amp;#39;s exceptionally high compensation—ranging from $248k for entry-level to over $6M for distinguished engineers—as a primary reason for staying &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48655165&quot; title=&quot;Meta must really be paying a lot!&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48655404&quot; title=&quot;Indeed → https://www.levels.fyi/companies/facebook/salaries • Engineer (E3, entry level) $248.2K avg ∴ https://www.levels.fyi/companies/facebook/salaries/software-... • Engineer (E5, senior level) $629.8K avg ∴ https://www.levels.fyi/companies/facebook/salaries/software-... • Engineer (E7, principal) $1.69M avg ∴ https://www.levels.fyi/companies/facebook/salaries/software-... • Engineer (E9, distinguished) $6.09M avg ∴ https://www.levels.fyi/companies/facebook/salaries/software-... And so on…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that financial stability does not provide moral absolution for choosing the &amp;#34;easy path&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48654451&quot; title=&quot;Your options are: 1. Find another job   2. Don’t find another job You can’t say “where else can I work” like you have no agency over your life.  Everyone chooses every day to do what they do that day. You don’t get to be morally absolved because you’re choosing the easy path and you’re “stuck”.  I’m sure there are plenty of places that pay less that would love to have talented remote employees.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Employees seeking to leave report difficulties finding comparable remote roles outside of coastal hubs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48654373&quot; title=&quot;Where should we work instead? I’d really like to leave, but I’m kind of stuck, and I don’t have enough to retire. I have to work remote from a non-coast state for family care reasons, and the places I’ve interviewed at the last few months have balked at hiring a remote employee.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, while international developers contrast Meta&amp;#39;s pay scales with significantly lower average salaries in regions like Germany &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48655822&quot; title=&quot;Crying in Germany with 60-85k average SW engineer salary.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.jim-nielsen.com/2026/blogging-stating-the-obvious/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Blogging can just be stating the obvious&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.jim-nielsen.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48666927&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;465 points · 133 comments · by Curiositry&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that blogging is often about the willingness to state obvious truths that others ignore, such as the absurdity of user-hostile web patterns like intrusive popups. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.jim-nielsen.com/2026/blogging-stating-the-obvious/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Blogging Can Just Be Stating The Obvious    URL Source: https://blog.jim-nielsen.com/2026/blogging-stating-the-obvious/    Markdown Content:  [John Gruber writes about those annoying popups](https://daringfireball.net/2026/05/what_is_a_dickover) every website seems to have now and while he does a great job tearing into these ubiquitous, user-hostile patterns, one of the things that stood out to me about his piece was this meta commentary on blogging. Here’s John:    &amp;gt; If you visit a website you…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion explores the tension between the perceived lack of original thought and the value of restating &amp;#34;obvious&amp;#34; ideas, with some arguing that experts are often stymied by the fear of adding noise to a redundant information landscape &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667406&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; So it must be that a key ingredient to blogging is simple: have a willingness to state something that seems obvious to you but nobody else is saying it. Or if someone else is saying it, just link to them and say, “Yes!!! This!!!” As a young mathematician in grade school, I had boundless enthusiasm to prove and present basic theorems in number theory and geometry. Now, as a PhD mathematician who has since pivoted into other fields, when I&amp;#39;m considering new mathematical content, I feel only the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667850&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This statement, combined with the previous one, is interesting, to say the least. It could easily be taken as self-aggrandizing. Not self-aggrandizing. There are very few things that I consider myself &amp;#39;(among the) most capable&amp;#39; of explaining, and most of them are not interesting to people. There are many more things that I&amp;#39;m somewhat competent in explaining, but those suffer the intimidation of the eyes. &amp;gt; Maybe your feeling of &amp;#39;only the stymying influence of a million invisible eyes&amp;#39; is…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. However, many participants contend that repetition is essential because different audiences require different tones, anecdotes, or timing to truly internalize a concept &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667381&quot; title=&quot;A couple other versions of this that have always stood out to me: 1) There&amp;#39;s always a new cohort of people that don&amp;#39;t know the things you know. You assume since you know it, everyone does. But kids coming up, or whoever, aren&amp;#39;t you. They don&amp;#39;t know this stuff yet. You can easily be the first time they&amp;#39;ve heard &amp;#39;make something people want&amp;#39; and where that comes from. The Curse of Knowledge https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curse_of_knowledge 2) There&amp;#39;s always another tone/anecdote/verse that makes…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667621&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; it is fair to say no one ever has any original thoughts, and the ones most capable of elucidating existing ideas can be the ones least motivated to do so. This statement, combined with the previous one, is interesting, to say the least.  It could easily be taken as self-aggrandizing, and maybe your feeling of &amp;#39;only the stymying influence of a million invisible eyes&amp;#39; is partly because of your style? &amp;gt; Among these resources in particular, I just see the same old arguments and observations…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667690&quot; title=&quot;How the information is shared can be as important as the act of sharing it in the first place. You might have a particular voice and style for communicating these ideas, but your audience may have otherwise passed it over without your unique approach.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some see this redundancy as a social ritual or a failure of information density &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667406&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; So it must be that a key ingredient to blogging is simple: have a willingness to state something that seems obvious to you but nobody else is saying it. Or if someone else is saying it, just link to them and say, “Yes!!! This!!!” As a young mathematician in grade school, I had boundless enthusiasm to prove and present basic theorems in number theory and geometry. Now, as a PhD mathematician who has since pivoted into other fields, when I&amp;#39;m considering new mathematical content, I feel only the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667850&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; This statement, combined with the previous one, is interesting, to say the least. It could easily be taken as self-aggrandizing. Not self-aggrandizing. There are very few things that I consider myself &amp;#39;(among the) most capable&amp;#39; of explaining, and most of them are not interesting to people. There are many more things that I&amp;#39;m somewhat competent in explaining, but those suffer the intimidation of the eyes. &amp;gt; Maybe your feeling of &amp;#39;only the stymying influence of a million invisible eyes&amp;#39; is…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest that being the &amp;#34;convenient&amp;#34; source for a specific reader at the right moment is a valuable service in itself &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667381&quot; title=&quot;A couple other versions of this that have always stood out to me: 1) There&amp;#39;s always a new cohort of people that don&amp;#39;t know the things you know. You assume since you know it, everyone does. But kids coming up, or whoever, aren&amp;#39;t you. They don&amp;#39;t know this stuff yet. You can easily be the first time they&amp;#39;ve heard &amp;#39;make something people want&amp;#39; and where that comes from. The Curse of Knowledge https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curse_of_knowledge 2) There&amp;#39;s always another tone/anecdote/verse that makes…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48669631&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Are you not just noise competing with other noise, drowning out the valuable signals in your domain for your own personal gain You have an audience willing to give you the benefit of the doubt to learn something they’re unfamiliar with. It’s specifically the fact that you chose to highlight a topic that makes your audience pay attention. Perhaps nobody else could have gotten their attention and adjusted their perspective the way you can. Not necessarily because you’re intrinsically better,…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.economist.com/by-invitation/2026/06/02/how-the-war-on-terror-primed-america-for-autocracy&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The war on terror primed America for autocracy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (economist.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48654367&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;292 points · 288 comments · by andsoitis&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#34;war on terror&amp;#34; expanded executive power and normalized aggressive rhetoric, creating a political environment that weakened democratic norms and paved the way for autocratic leadership in the United States. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.economist.com/by-invitation/2026/06/02/how-the-war-on-terror-primed-america-for-autocracy&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.is&amp;amp;#x2F;CBCZM&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.is&amp;amp;#x2F;CBCZM&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely agree that the post-9/11 era, specifically the Patriot Act, marked a permanent trade of civil liberties for a &amp;#34;bogus promise of safety&amp;#34; that the Supreme Court failed to check &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48654633&quot; title=&quot;Exactly what everyone said when Patriot Act was passed and renewed repeatedly. America permanently traded away basic freedoms for the bogus promise of safety in the shadow of fear. And the Supreme Court was too scared to stop it despite its obvious constitutional problems. Crying eagle photos in chain-emails were sufficient propaganda to keep it in place.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48654632&quot; title=&quot;This seemed obvious to me at the time. It was hard to understand why people in the cultural mainstream let themselves get swept up in it. I felt like I lost my country, back then, as they pretty much all went off into crazyland together.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48654777&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Exactly what everyone said when Patriot Act was passed I&amp;#39;ve been seeing plenty of Americans cheering on temporary safety over essential liberty since then, and I can&amp;#39;t even provide examples without getting [flagged].&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Some argue that Osama bin Laden successfully achieved his goal of weakening America by forcing it into a state of decline &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48654711&quot; title=&quot;Yes. History will record that bin Laden won.  There&amp;#39;s a pre-9/11 book about bin Laden, &amp;#39;The Man Who Declared War on America&amp;#39;.   Bin Laden was interviewed. Consider the situation at the end of the Clinton administration. The US was at peace. The Soviet Union was gone. The US got along with China and Russia. No major enemies remained. The federal budget was balanced. Bin Laden looked at that, and realized that America had to be weakened before it could be defeated. That was his plan. Mission…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, while others contend his actions merely enriched contractors and accelerated a pre-existing 100-year trajectory toward centralized military empire &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48654740&quot; title=&quot;It wasn’t just the GOTW. It was much of the 20th century from World War I onward. Each step led to further centralization of government, a larger and larger security apparatus, and more and more foreign entanglements. We are more or less retracing the path of Rome as the Republic expanded militarily until it was no longer practical to run it as a republic and it transitioned to empire.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48656572&quot; title=&quot;Oh come on. You’re trying to be edgy without any understanding of reality. It’s like saying History will record Gavrilo Princip as having won WW1. Huh? America’s current troubles are political polarization and ballooning deficits. Both of which are happening in every developed country, having nothing to do with 9/11. The foreign interventionism is a 100 year tradition in the US, nothing new under the sun. The only thing Bin Laden accomplished is making air travel annoying, making some military…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. However, a counter-perspective suggests that bin Laden failed, noting that current issues like polarization and deficits are global trends unrelated to 9/11, and that his actions ultimately led to more American interventionism rather than less &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48656572&quot; title=&quot;Oh come on. You’re trying to be edgy without any understanding of reality. It’s like saying History will record Gavrilo Princip as having won WW1. Huh? America’s current troubles are political polarization and ballooning deficits. Both of which are happening in every developed country, having nothing to do with 9/11. The foreign interventionism is a 100 year tradition in the US, nothing new under the sun. The only thing Bin Laden accomplished is making air travel annoying, making some military…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/23/us/politics/nsa-lost-access-anthropic-tool.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;NSA lost access to Mythos amid Anthropic dispute&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nytimes.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48658300&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;264 points · &lt;strong&gt;284 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by thm&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The National Security Agency has reportedly lost access to Mythos, a powerful AI tool, following a contractual or policy dispute with its developer, Anthropic. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/23/us/politics/nsa-lost-access-anthropic-tool.html&quot; title=&quot;Unlocked: &amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.nytimes.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;06&amp;amp;#x2F;23&amp;amp;#x2F;us&amp;amp;#x2F;politics&amp;amp;#x2F;nsa-lost-access-anthropic-tool.html?unlocked_article_code=1.sVA.Xgol.aUCRzN6jvdv-&amp;amp;amp;smid=nytcore-ios-share&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.nytimes.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;06&amp;amp;#x2F;23&amp;amp;#x2F;us&amp;amp;#x2F;politics&amp;amp;#x2F;nsa-lost-acce...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are largely skeptical of the claim that the NSA lost access to Mythos, with many dismissing the narrative as a &amp;#34;marketing stunt&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;propaganda&amp;#34; designed to inflate Anthropic&amp;#39;s perceived capabilities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663945&quot; title=&quot;AI marketing bullshit stunts are unlike anything I&amp;#39;ve seen in 30 years. It started with MS Copilot so called capabilities for work, which were completely made up use cases that didn&amp;#39;t work at all (3 years later still). We&amp;#39;ve had OpenAI &amp;#39;AGI is coming&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;AI will take your job&amp;#39;, now we have Mythos being so &amp;#39;dangerous&amp;#39; for cybersecurity, which of course makes the average Joe interpret it as Anthropic being &amp;#39;the better overall company, the NSA uses it!!&amp;#39;. I mean gov foes with Anthropic are…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663649&quot; title=&quot;Yeah... NSA literally has MITM proxies/interception of any traffic they want inside every major US tech company (based on my reading/following of Snowden leaks and others). Anthropic wouldn&amp;#39;t be able to exist without implicit NSA approval. This article reads more like a marketing piece for Anthropic/Mythos... and ends by talking about how much NSA wants Anthropic models. Propaganda.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Several users argue that the federal government could simply seize the model weights or use existing surveillance infrastructure to maintain access if they truly desired &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663447&quot; title=&quot;Doesn&amp;#39;t make any sense. They could just force them to provide Mythos to the federal government.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663649&quot; title=&quot;Yeah... NSA literally has MITM proxies/interception of any traffic they want inside every major US tech company (based on my reading/following of Snowden leaks and others). Anthropic wouldn&amp;#39;t be able to exist without implicit NSA approval. This article reads more like a marketing piece for Anthropic/Mythos... and ends by talking about how much NSA wants Anthropic models. Propaganda.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663836&quot; title=&quot;They could easily take the weights if they wanted. I don&amp;#39;t believe they meaningfully lost access.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite this skepticism toward the marketing, some participants highlight the genuine &amp;#34;force multiplier&amp;#34; effect of such models in cybersecurity tasks, such as rapidly diagnosing complex bugs or automating decompilation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664827&quot; title=&quot;mythos allowed mediocre people to get results by holding their hand through the process, or just ignoring their irrelevant input and knowing what to do. if you throw millions of tokens at IDA Pro MCP with the right prompt lets just say security by obscurity fails miserably because there is no obscurity when the LLM chews through the decompilation.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664098&quot; title=&quot;I was able to identify, diagnose, fix, and upstream a minor bug in and erlang/OTP ssh key implementation with Opus in maybe 20 minutes (+2 weeks or so for upstream).  It is not impossible that I could have done this before, but it would have taken days or weeks.  The actual fix was about 2 lines of code, hardly AI slop, but getting there would have been quite the slog, and I never would have done it. There is a lot of the reason for AI skepticism out there, but people tend to do massive…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rubyllm.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;RubyLLM: A Ruby framework for all major AI providers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (rubyllm.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48660711&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;446 points · 82 comments · by doener&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RubyLLM is a unified Ruby framework that provides a consistent interface for integrating major AI providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google Gemini to build chatbots, agents, and RAG applications. &lt;a href=&quot;https://rubyllm.com/&quot; title=&quot;RubyLLM    A single, beautiful Ruby framework for all major AI providers. Easily build chatbots, AI agents, RAG applications, content generators, and every AI workflow you can think of.    [Skip to main content](#main-content)   Link      Menu      Expand       (external link)    Document      Search       Copy       Copied    * [RubyLLM](/)    * [GitHub](https://github.com/crmne/ruby_llm)  * [Changelog](https://github.com/crmne/ruby_llm/releases)  * [Blog](https://paolino.me)    Getting Started    *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RubyLLM is praised for its high usability and developer experience, with some users comparing it favorably to Vercel’s AI framework &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48661194&quot; title=&quot;I found Ruby LLM to be surprisingly good - in terms of usability it&amp;#39;s close to Vercel&amp;#39;s AI framework. It tries to strike a balance between working out of the box and being flexible... which has its challenges, still nice overall. One big real-life pain I experienced is that caches don&amp;#39;t always work, e.g. for xAI, since it only supports completions API and thought signatures are returned wrong.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While there is debate regarding the necessity of provider-specific parameters, the author clarifies that most common settings like temperature and thinking effort are standardized across the library &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48661139&quot; title=&quot;It is quite nice, but not as nice as you&amp;#39;d want. You still have to set platform specifics when running completions when you want to tune things like temperature, effort, max tokens, etc.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48661204&quot; title=&quot;RubyLLM author here. I&amp;#39;m not sure where you got that. `chat.with_temperature(0.2)` https://rubyllm.com/chat/#controlling-response-behavior `chat.with_thinking(effort: :high, budget: 8000)` https://rubyllm.com/thinking/#controlling-extended-thinking Max tokens is the only one of your list that require provider specific params: https://rubyllm.com/chat/#provider-specific-parameters I&amp;#39;m one guy doing it for free. Happy to see your contribution!&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. The discussion also features a broader philosophical divide: some argue that dynamic languages like Ruby are becoming obsolete for LLM development compared to static typing, while others maintain that Ruby remains a &amp;#34;dream&amp;#34; for readability and rapid development &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48662229&quot; title=&quot;Why would anyone still build in dynamically typed languages in 2026? Why relinquish the crystal clear signals that static typing is able to provide to the LLM?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663842&quot; title=&quot;You static typed evangelists have lost your damn minds. You seem to have completely misunderstood what this library even is because you have some primal urge to boast static typing at every chance. You can build high quality software with dynamically typed languages, and Ruby is an absolute dream to read and write.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663642&quot; title=&quot;Even as rails dev, I am seeing that you might be right. It’s really hard to find specific pros nowadays that Ruby brings to the table. All that talk about conventions over configurations and vast presence of Rails in weights is fun, but if writing speed isn’t an issue anymore, then Ruby on Rails has serious problems with larger codebases&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite its utility, some long-term users report challenges with maintainer engagement and the consistency of certain features like caching &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48661194&quot; title=&quot;I found Ruby LLM to be surprisingly good - in terms of usability it&amp;#39;s close to Vercel&amp;#39;s AI framework. It tries to strike a balance between working out of the box and being flexible... which has its challenges, still nice overall. One big real-life pain I experienced is that caches don&amp;#39;t always work, e.g. for xAI, since it only supports completions API and thought signatures are returned wrong.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667705&quot; title=&quot;We&amp;#39;ve used RubyLLM for ~6+ months and it&amp;#39;s been mostly OK. The API/Dev UX is good but we have seen little success with engaging the maintainer on PRs, and have noticed a lot of vibe coded PRs being merged (including some rewrites of PRs we submitted) - I suspect an minimal API compatible gem with similar heuristics would do well.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.omgmog.net/post/xteink-x4-e-ink-reader/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Xteink X4 E-Ink Reader&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.omgmog.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48662381&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;304 points · 187 comments · by felixdoerp&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Xteink X4 is a portable, £40 e-ink reader designed to mount to phones, praised for its pocketable size and crisp display despite minimal stock firmware. Users can significantly enhance the device by flashing custom open-source firmwares like CrossPoint or Inx to add advanced typography, wireless syncing, and polished UI features. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.omgmog.net/post/xteink-x4-e-ink-reader/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Xteink X4 E-Ink Reader    URL Source: https://blog.omgmog.net/post/xteink-x4-e-ink-reader/    Published Time: 2026-06-23T00:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  I’ve had the Xteink X4 for a couple of months now, a £40 e-ink reader small enough to stick to the back of a phone. I’d seen a few posts about it ([Khairul Selamat](https://medium.com/@khairul_selamat/the-xteink-x4-e-ink-e-reader-flawed-little-device-i-cant-stop-using-82ef97ed6e6d), [Neil…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Xteink X4 is praised as a highly portable, &amp;#34;genuine&amp;#34; e-reader that excels for commutes due to its pocketable size and physical buttons, though users note it lacks the backlight and high DPI of larger devices like the Kindle or Kobo &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663311&quot; title=&quot;Got the X4. Put CrossPoint on it. Works like a charm. The http server accessible over wifi makes transferring books extremely simple. (Shame on the Kindle for locking everything down.) This is proof-of-concept that a microcontroller is more than enough for something like an e-reader. I have a Kindle and a Kobo. They are sturdy devices. But the X4 is the one that is a genuine e-reader. Would not get it as my one and only e-reader though as you tend to miss the size and backlight of the larger…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663700&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m with you on every bit. I love my Kobo Libra 2 and it lives on my nightstand table. It&amp;#39;s an excellent reader. The X4 with CrossPoint is an alright reader, but I&amp;#39;ve been chewing through books on my morning commute because it fits in my jacket pocket and I can have it out on the train without bumping into other people. It&amp;#39;s not the best reader I own, but it&amp;#39;s the best reader I have on me at any given moment when I&amp;#39;m not laying in bed.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664041&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve looked at this device and I wonder how good the layout engine is. Screenshots never show text with any hyphenation going on which makes me wonder if it even supports hyphenation. One of the images on the Amazon page for the reader has somebody holding one beside their laptop and if you look at the screen, it looks terrible. There are even words jammed together (&amp;#39;would be most suitable forthe job&amp;#39;). I love that it has physical buttons though. My reader is the Kindle Oasis and the buttons…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While its microcontroller-based design allows for simple book transfers via local Wi-Fi, the limited hardware makes sophisticated typography and CSS rendering a significant challenge &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663311&quot; title=&quot;Got the X4. Put CrossPoint on it. Works like a charm. The http server accessible over wifi makes transferring books extremely simple. (Shame on the Kindle for locking everything down.) This is proof-of-concept that a microcontroller is more than enough for something like an e-reader. I have a Kindle and a Kobo. They are sturdy devices. But the X4 is the one that is a genuine e-reader. Would not get it as my one and only e-reader though as you tend to miss the size and backlight of the larger…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664041&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve looked at this device and I wonder how good the layout engine is. Screenshots never show text with any hyphenation going on which makes me wonder if it even supports hyphenation. One of the images on the Amazon page for the reader has somebody holding one beside their laptop and if you look at the screen, it looks terrible. There are even words jammed together (&amp;#39;would be most suitable forthe job&amp;#39;). I love that it has physical buttons though. My reader is the Kindle Oasis and the buttons…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664722&quot; title=&quot;The layout engine is limited. It does flow text quite well, but when I had mine (the screen broke a few months ago) I was working on adding more features to the rendering engine. It&amp;#39;s easy to write a HTML &amp;amp; CSS layout engine to support most of the epub spec, but hard to do it well on such a constrained chip. Even things like nested lists and inline code snippets are a challenge.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion highlights a preference for the third-party CrossPoint firmware over the stock experience, though some users question the device&amp;#39;s utility over a smartphone or more versatile Android-based e-ink tablets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663224&quot; title=&quot;For those who can afford it, I can recommend the Boox Note for the ebook reader. It comes with full Android, so you are not limited to books but can read news, Hacker News, and other doomscrolling that fills the Internet. In a pinch, you can also connect it to a Bluetooth keyboard and use it as a development terminal. SSH terminal looks gorgeous on e-ink.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667957&quot; title=&quot;Question to X4 owners - what is the benefit over a smartphone? I have a kindle for beach and travel as a good compromise size; I use my 10&amp;#39; tablet when I really settle in for reading, or when I read technical books with graphs or books with photographs etc. For my adhoc reader I use kindle app on my phone. What is the unique selling point of something like X4? I notice it attaches to the phone which seems bizarre, phone feels like a functional superset, so I must be missing something - is it…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663272&quot; title=&quot;CrossPoint 1.4.0 came out 2 hours ago: https://github.com/crosspoint-reader/crosspoint-reader/relea...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fortune.com/2026/06/24/reid-hoffman-spacex-musk-openai-anthropic-gen-z-mistake/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Reid Hoffman says SpaceX &amp;#39;not an AI company&amp;#39;, xAI &amp;#39;complete train wreck&amp;#39;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (fortune.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48658647&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;227 points · &lt;strong&gt;259 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by 1vuio0pswjnm7&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reid Hoffman criticized Elon Musk’s AI strategy, labeling xAI a &amp;#34;complete train wreck&amp;#34; due to cofounder departures and dismissing SpaceX as a non-AI company that is merely attempting to buy relevance through acquisitions and infrastructure leasing. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fortune.com/2026/06/24/reid-hoffman-spacex-musk-openai-anthropic-gen-z-mistake/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Reid Hoffman says SpaceX ‘isn’t an AI company,’ xAI is ‘a complete train wreck’—and there’s room for both OpenAI and Anthropic | Fortune    URL Source: https://fortune.com/2026/06/24/reid-hoffman-spacex-musk-openai-anthropic-gen-z-mistake/    Markdown Content:  Reid Hoffman has watched the AI industry from virtually every vantage point—as a founder, lead investor, and decade-long [Microsoft](https://fortune.com/company/microsoft/) board member. So when he calls SpaceX’s AI strategy “buy[ing]…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters largely dismiss Reid Hoffman’s criticisms as out-of-touch posturing driven by a personal rivalry with Elon Musk rather than objective technical analysis &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48659277&quot; title=&quot;How is Reid Hoffman relevant? Someone like Elon being asked for their opinion on tech - I kind of understand - was at least at the coal face of SpaceX and Tesla for a time, seemed to understand the tech and was not terrible when it came to direction. Zuck I&amp;#39;d get, Bezos, Dario, Sam - but I don&amp;#39;t actually get why Reid is always in the conversation - he&amp;#39;s never been in front of anything&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48659253&quot; title=&quot;Reid Hoffman hates Musk.  Think what you will of Musk (we all have our opinions), but Hoffman criticizing one of Musks companies is the equivalent of Steve Jobs criticizing Windows.  Its a personal quibble and therefore not really news worthy.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48659001&quot; title=&quot;This shows how out of touch people like Reid Hoffman is. He thinks it&amp;#39;s a daming accusation that SpaceX is &amp;#39;not AI&amp;#39; but in reality &amp;#39;not AI&amp;#39; means rockets and satellite internet. The parts of the business his class cares about is the garbage, not the substance Agree that X.ai is a tire fire.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While there is some agreement that xAI may be a &amp;#34;tire fire,&amp;#34; users argue that Hoffman’s attempt to devalue SpaceX for not being an &amp;#34;AI company&amp;#34; ignores the substance of its physical engineering achievements &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48659001&quot; title=&quot;This shows how out of touch people like Reid Hoffman is. He thinks it&amp;#39;s a daming accusation that SpaceX is &amp;#39;not AI&amp;#39; but in reality &amp;#39;not AI&amp;#39; means rockets and satellite internet. The parts of the business his class cares about is the garbage, not the substance Agree that X.ai is a tire fire.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, his advice to Gen Z is criticized as patronizing &amp;#34;hype&amp;#34; from an investor with deep financial ties to Musk&amp;#39;s competitors, such as OpenAI and Anthropic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48660099&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; “I’ve been thinking about writing an essay on the kind of mistakes that are made by college graduates booing or otherwise dissing AI,” he said. As if speaking to all of Gen Z, he added: “You guys have the opportunity to be generation AI—where you come into the workforce saying, ‘I know this a lot better than all of you&amp;#39; Quite patronising. Maybe they really do know it a lot better than you, Reid, but not in the way you think. Maybe they see through the hype and hustle culture and are more…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48660499&quot; title=&quot;Such an out of touch attempt to get the youths onboard the hype train.. ok boomer.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48659302&quot; title=&quot;As the article said, Reid Hoffman is on Microsoft’s board and is an investor both in OpenAI and Anthropic.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dev.karltryggvason.com/you-cant-unit-test-for-taste/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;You can&amp;#39;t unit test for taste&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (dev.karltryggvason.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48657049&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;302 points · 141 comments · by kalli&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The developer of the fitness app *In the Long Run* built a data pipeline using DuckDB and Claude to identify global points of interest, ultimately finding that while AI provides useful subjective &amp;#34;taste&amp;#34; for ranking landmarks, traditional data sources remain more reliable for factual accuracy. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dev.karltryggvason.com/you-cant-unit-test-for-taste/&quot; title=&quot;Title: You can&amp;#39;t unit test for taste    URL Source: https://dev.karltryggvason.com/you-cant-unit-test-for-taste/    Published Time: 2026-06-22T13:28:21+02:00    Markdown Content:  22 June 2026·12 mins    I’m building [_In the Long Run_](https://inthelongrun.app/) where runners do _virtual_ runs on famous routes around the world. The app tallies up your Strava mileage and plots your total distance as progress against country- or continent-spanning routes. The intention is to provide long-term inspiration…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the difficulty of codifying &amp;#34;taste,&amp;#34; with some arguing that it cannot be fully externalized into unit tests because human intuition is not a hashmap or a set of rules &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48672897&quot; title=&quot;You can&amp;#39;t unit test for taste if you haven&amp;#39;t written down what you mean by taste. If you can externalize it, then you can. Follow this line of thinking, and the AI-friendly answer is easy: we just have to externalize everything we know, so Claude can implement what I want. Except that I can&amp;#39;t fully externalize myself. Debugging a system takes more resources than running the system. If I could write down everything I know and hand it to a machine, I&amp;#39;d do that, but it impossible. People aren&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48672961&quot; title=&quot;It can&amp;#39;t be written down as code, that&amp;#39;s the point. I am more familiar with taste in coding and it can at best be described—that the resulting code is too subtly different from something else in the codebase, that you&amp;#39;re masking a different bug, that you&amp;#39;re not following what the code tells you. The good part is that while this cannot be unit tested, you can write documentation and code comments about it that tell people what they need to know. But for taste of the kind described in the article…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some believe machine learning could eventually mimic taste through iterative comparison &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48673576&quot; title=&quot;You may be able to effectively externalize taste by &amp;#39;hot or not&amp;#39; style pair testing. Enough comparisons and I&amp;#39;d expect ML to be able to mimic human taste by latching on to features we&amp;#39;re not well aware of influencing us.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that even established standards like Apple’s Human Interface Guidelines serve only as a &amp;#34;north star&amp;#34; rather than a testable certainty &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48675090&quot; title=&quot;Apple&amp;#39;s human interface guidelines says that some things can be written down though. It&amp;#39;s a very thurough look at UX and while they don&amp;#39;t adhere to them perfectly themselves, it&amp;#39;s very much a north star to a some ideals. You can&amp;#39;t unit test for taste, but you can integration test that bad tastes haven&amp;#39;t happened.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48678500&quot; title=&quot;They wrote the HIG before Alan came in and trashed the place.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics of Test-Driven Development (TDD) further argue that correctness does not compose upward, meaning unit tests often fail to capture the emergent properties and aesthetic &amp;#34;taste&amp;#34; required for a cohesive final product &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48673808&quot; title=&quot;Exactly one of the reasons I never went down with all the TDD dogma of only writing code to fix broken tests. There is a reason conference talks are always about plain algorithms and data structures.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48674061&quot; title=&quot;The biggest flaw I&amp;#39;ve seen with TDD is the fact that correctness does not compose upward. Every time two units come into contact, you&amp;#39;ve got an entirely new kind of unit. The tests from constituents do not cover emergent properties of the new things. You will repeat this same exercise the entire way up to the top, and the moment you come into contact with the customer (they want to change everything), the house of cards comes crumbling down and you have to start your agonizingly-slow process…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-radio-chip-design&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI learns the “dark art” of RFIC design&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (spectrum.ieee.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48660021&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;262 points · 173 comments · by Brajeshwar&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Princeton researchers are using reinforcement learning and diffusion models to automate the &amp;#34;dark art&amp;#34; of RFIC design, creating novel, high-performance radio chips in minutes rather than years by bypassing traditional human templates and accelerating complex electromagnetic simulations. &lt;a href=&quot;https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-radio-chip-design&quot; title=&quot;Title: AI Learns the “Dark Art” of RFIC Design    URL Source: https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-radio-chip-design    Published Time: 2026-06-24T13:00:01Z    Markdown Content:  ## Summary    *   RFIC design is a complex “[dark art](https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-radio-chip-design#darkart)” that limits progress in wireless technologies like 5G, autonomous vehicles, and satellite communications.  *   Princeton researchers use reinforcement learning and [inverse…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a growing frustration with the term &amp;#34;AI,&amp;#34; arguing it has become a vague catch-all that conflates modern LLMs with established statistical methods like genetic algorithms &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700672&quot; title=&quot;I’m a bit frustrated. AI can do a looot of things; but I think as we continue to muddy the waters between LLMs and more traditional machine learning like Monte Carlo, Genetic Algoriths, Expert Systems and other Statistics magic tricks, we’re too aggressively conflating established and morally neutral activities in ML with the concerns that people have about LLMs and Stable Diffusion. Though I also imagine that that is the point.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700780&quot; title=&quot;I wish I could wave a magic wand and just make the word &amp;#39;AI&amp;#39; go away. It has no actual meaning. It could mean anything from your opponent in Mario Kart to Stable Diffusion.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700706&quot; title=&quot;It is a problem because people will talk about what AI can do implying that an LLM can do that thing, making it seem like a pure LLM can do almost anything.  On the other hand people will say AI will never be able to do X because an LLM can’t do that thing well natively.  AI has become too vague of a term to be useful.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users debate whether these systems are truly creative or merely interpolating training data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700334&quot; title=&quot;I am confused, every day I read on HN that AI&amp;#39;s can just interpolate the data they have seen in training, and that they are structurally incapable of coming up with something new, creative and not in the training distribution.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700916&quot; title=&quot;I disagree. AI is doing exactly what it was predicted it would in science fiction. The computer can now literally talk to you in natural language and then perfectly produce sophisticated actions in response to completely arbitrary and unstructured input. It trivially passes the Turing test. By any definition prior to the year 2023 we are living with Artificial General Intelligence and it’s here now.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest that AI-driven design could be used for &amp;#34;patent poisoning&amp;#34; by algorithmically generating and publishing masses of prior art &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48701293&quot; title=&quot;One great application of AI design is patent poisoning.  Use AI to churn out masses of variant designs, make them publicly visible on a web site, and if future patents come out use any collisions to invalidate them or at least restrict their scope (generalization of a patent is limited by prior art.)&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48701728&quot; title=&quot;I’m reminded of lawyer Damien Riehl’s (performative) reaction to the Sam Smith infringement decision, back in 2019/2020. He and programmer Noah Rubin algorithmically generated every possible melody (within a certain combinatorial space, in MIDI format as I recall), and purported to release them under CC-0 license [0]. He went on to attract some attention and explain his argument at a regional TEDx event [1]. I seem to recall legal commentators reacting with an eyeroll—apparently judges split…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a philosophical concern that as machines master complex fields like RFIC design, human-legible &amp;#34;elegant&amp;#34; theories may be replaced by messy, machine-only equations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48701516&quot; title=&quot;I wonder if our common expectation that true theories somehow had to be beautiful and elegant is going to survive the coming century. What if &amp;#39;real&amp;#39; nature phenomenon were actually best described by horrible mess of impossible equations, that only machines could actually manipulate and reason about ? That would be really sad..&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700365&quot; title=&quot;Reminds me of good ol genetic algorithm search. Guess and check can be quite powerful, especially if you can toss in agent in the loop guidance. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolved_antenna&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.greptile.com/blog/prs-on-openclaw&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;PR spam today looks like email spam in the early 2000s&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (greptile.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48660579&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;264 points · 155 comments · by dakshgupta&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A statistical study of the OpenClaw repository reveals a surge in low-effort, AI-generated pull request spam, suggesting that open-source projects will increasingly require sender reputation systems and human-led architectural insights to manage the high volume of automated contributions. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.greptile.com/blog/prs-on-openclaw&quot; title=&quot;Title: A statistical study of PRs opened on openclaw/openclaw    URL Source: https://www.greptile.com/blog/prs-on-openclaw    Published Time: 2026-05-08T12:00:00    Markdown Content:  I&amp;#39;m Rahul, and I work at Greptile, where we build AI agents that review pull requests. Greptile reviews PRs for OpenClaw which became the fastest-growing repo in GitHub history almost overnight. That gave us a front row seat to something strange.    Last December, OpenClaw was getting two pull requests a week. By February,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current surge in AI-generated pull requests is largely attributed to individuals attempting to build a personal brand or credible online presence, though some argue contributors may genuinely believe they are being helpful &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48662659&quot; title=&quot;Unfortunately &amp;#39;I donated money/tokens to open source&amp;#39; doesn&amp;#39;t land interviews as well as &amp;#39;I&amp;#39;m a big contributor to open source&amp;#39; People spamming Open Source repos with AI PRs aren&amp;#39;t trying to help Open Source, they&amp;#39;re trying to build a brand, some kind of credible online presence with their username on it, or whatever else. It&amp;#39;s purely selfish and completely opposite to the spirit of Open Software imo&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48662878&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;People spamming Open Source repos with AI PRs aren&amp;#39;t trying to help Open Source, they&amp;#39;re trying to build a brand I am certain many of them honestly believe that they are doing the right thing and that they are helping. After all hey, they implemented a feature or fixed a bug for the community! It&amp;#39;s a grim worldview if you think they are all just selfish.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664213&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not like this must be exclusively A or B. The high school kid who volunteers at a homeless shelter and hopes it will help their college app is likely doing it both out of altruism and self-interest. (Actually, the person who helps people because it feels good is also acting out of self-interest). Given many ways to be altruistic, people will usually pick the ones that coincide more with their self interest.  And in turn, self interest can warp a lot of the outcomes, even if people are…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While some maintainers are implementing strict &amp;#34;non-textual&amp;#34; verification or blanket bans on AI agents, others suggest shifting toward token-based donation models to bypass the &amp;#34;middle-man&amp;#34; of low-quality contributions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48662250&quot; title=&quot;Maybe we should cut out the middle-man and make it easy for people to donate token credits to open-source projects, and let the maintainers decide how to use them.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48662380&quot; title=&quot;In my main project we added a new requirement that all new contributors meet a maintainer in a non-textual format before their first PR is merged. Seems to work well for a small project.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48662362&quot; title=&quot;AI agents who review the slop created by other AI agents is not the answer here. I much prefer a blanket ban on PRs and issues created by AI agents (which is what I personally do for my repos; so far I have closed one[1]). In fact I would love a github alternative which considers AI contributions to be a breach of their terms of use and ban any people who let AI agents loose on their platform. 1: https://github.com/runarberg/markdown-it-math/pull/48#issuec...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. To combat this, GitHub has introduced configurable PR limits, though the lack of organizational accountability—unlike the IP-based reputation systems used in email—remains a significant hurdle &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664017&quot; title=&quot;GitHub just recently added configurable PR limits for maintainers to help partially address this problem: https://github.blog/open-source/maintainers/how-pull-request...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663712&quot; title=&quot;I see one big difference: with email it was always about sender reputation based on email servers (IPs), maybe about domains. But never about individual users. It&amp;#39;s the organizations running the email server, who make sure users behave. So they don&amp;#39;t get blacklisted and lose sending privileges for hundreds or thousands of users. For PRs/issues this is not applicable.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ben-mini.com/2026/stealing-is-a-skill&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Stealing Is a Skill&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ben-mini.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48659165&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;265 points · 152 comments · by bewal416&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that &amp;#34;stealing&amp;#34; is a vital creative skill, advocating for Virgil Abloh’s &amp;#34;3% approach&amp;#34; of rebuilding existing works pixel-by-pixel to deeply understand their design logic before applying small, intentional modifications to solve problems more efficiently. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ben-mini.com/2026/stealing-is-a-skill&quot; title=&quot;Title: Stealing is a Skill    URL Source: https://ben-mini.com/2026/stealing-is-a-skill    Published Time: 2026-06-24T00:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  June 24, 2026• 3 min read •[![Image 1: Ben Wallace](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/2003937431800672256/1yFgGSqn_400x400.jpg)@DJbennyBuff](https://x.com/DJbennyBuff)    * * *    I’m slowly developing my own list of advice: have [a creative mindset](https://ben-mini.com/2023/the-meaning-of-life), embrace [radical…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion compares &amp;#34;stealing&amp;#34; in design to &amp;#34;copywork&amp;#34; in writing and music, where verbatim replication serves as a rigorous exercise to master the techniques of the greats &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48660414&quot; title=&quot;Copywork is an exercise where writers just copy verbatim another writers work. If you haven’t done it, it is an extraordinary way to see how the greats work. It also tends to improve your own writing skills - at least as long as you are copying from your betters. This seems like the web design version of this.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664227&quot; title=&quot;Jazz musicians also copy each other&amp;#39;s solos for learning and practice purposes, but they would never actually perform more than a couple well placed quotes or licks from another player.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that pixel-perfect recreation is a difficult technical feat that builds deep appreciation for existing work &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48660185&quot; title=&quot;My favorite quote that expresses this idea is from Mikhail Kalashnikov, designer of the AK-47: “Before attempting to create something new, it is vital to have a good appreciation of everything that already exists in this field.”&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48660393&quot; title=&quot;I spent about a year copying pg’s site: https://github.com/shawwn/pg Result: https://shawwn.github.io/pg/ If you think it’s easy, it’s not. The closer you want it to be pixel perfect, the exponentially harder it is to get right. https://www.paulgraham.com/copy.html I’m very proud of it. I had to dig through decades-old viaweb templates to figure out which one he used.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others criticize the practice as disrespectful or unethical when applied to commercial projects without permission &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48660217&quot; title=&quot;I kind of agree in the sense that stealing a good idea and executing it well is a skill. Copying someones site &amp;#39;pixel by pixel&amp;#39; seems disrispectful though and I don&amp;#39;t know what there&amp;#39;s to be proud of.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664845&quot; title=&quot;Is the state of the webdesign really in a point where people bluntly copy others work for commercial purposes and celebrate these acts on their blogs? I think the line is pretty clear here. I remember the old Dan Mall&amp;#39;s article on this topic which is much more inspirational (and &amp;#39;correct&amp;#39;): https://medium.com/@danielmall/stealing-your-way-to-original...&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48661018&quot; title=&quot;I feel like there’s a difference between Virgil Abloh being brought in to work on an iteration of the Air Force 1s and simply ripping off a design from an unrelated company, presumably without permission, and making a few tweaks.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics also note that while copying is a valid learning tool, it can lead to a &amp;#34;bland&amp;#34; and generic modern web aesthetic compared to the original creativity of the early internet &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48661097&quot; title=&quot;The best way to make a really boring and generic product pop is... by copying a really boring and generic marketing page. God I miss the old internet. Give me some insane pixelated flash website over this bland trash any day. https://www.webdesignmuseum.org/flash-websites-in-the-early-...&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48659205&quot; title=&quot;Good artists copy, great artists steal? Still hurts to be the one being stolen from though.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/gemini-models/introducing-computer-use-gemini-3-5-flash/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Computer use in Gemini 3.5 Flash&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.google)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48662999&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;241 points · 168 comments · by swolpers&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google has integrated a native &amp;#34;computer use&amp;#34; tool into Gemini 3.5 Flash, allowing developers to build agents that can reason and take action across browser, mobile, and desktop environments for enterprise automation tasks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/gemini-models/introducing-computer-use-gemini-3-5-flash/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Introducing computer use in Gemini 3.5 Flash    URL Source: https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/gemini-models/introducing-computer-use-gemini-3-5-flash/    Published Time: 2026-06-24T16:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  [Skip to main content](https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/gemini-models/introducing-computer-use-gemini-3-5-flash/#jump-content)    [The Keyword](https://blog.google/)    Introducing computer use in Gemini 3.5…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The introduction of &amp;#34;computer use&amp;#34; capabilities in Gemini 3.5 Flash has sparked a debate over whether GUI-based agents are a revolutionary way to bypass corporate gatekeepers and automate proprietary tools &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664474&quot; title=&quot;Computer use is a great idea. It gets the job done when nothing else will. If you&amp;#39;re a person trying to get their job done at a big company, but half your job is in 1-2 proprietary tools or is stuck behind an API you can&amp;#39;t program against, computer use can allow you, a non-techie, to do your job more efficiently. I think it&amp;#39;s an awesome way to circumvent gate keepers and the IT department to let people accomplish their goals.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664038&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Computer use is such a terrible idea. It&amp;#39;s slow, insecure, error prone, expensive. And yet having an agent able yo use a computer on your behalf is really useful. Recently I gave a Nix OS vm to my hermes agent and it has been a good experience. I don&amp;#39;t really care if destroy the machine I can just rollback to an earlier version, and for any meaningful data he creates for me I make sure he creates a repo, commit and pushes to my private Gitea instance.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt; or a fundamentally flawed, insecure, and &amp;#34;tokenmaxxed&amp;#34; approach to OS interfacing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663445&quot; title=&quot;Computer use is such a terrible idea. It&amp;#39;s slow, insecure, error prone, expensive. I guess if you&amp;#39;re trying to get people to tokenmaxx it may look like a valid strategy, but ain&amp;#39;t no way this will be delightful to users. I think it&amp;#39;s a symptom of just not understanding how LLMs should interface with the OS because we&amp;#39;re still in their early days. Eventually there&amp;#39;ll be an iPhone moment for the ergonomics of LLM usage outside of coding&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664570&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; And yet having an agent able yo use a computer on your behalf is really useful. I honestly cannot think of a single use case&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Users report significant frustration with Gemini’s current reliability, citing overtuned guardrails that refuse benign tasks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664537&quot; title=&quot;People using google’s models: am I holding it wrong or are the guardrails really overtuned? I had the dubious pleasure of testing gemini of late and I kept running into refusals. How do I transfer a sim number from one provider to another? No. What should I consider when making backups on ntfs less prone to data loss and more bitrot resistant? No. Evaluate this piece of code? No. I’m not sure if it’s cold feet from the mythos situation or what, but it reminds me of the dark days where you…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, a tendency to hallucinate data before eventually giving up &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48665638&quot; title=&quot;Today I asked Gemini to extract a table from an PDF appendix and create C++ data table with its contents. After 15 or so iterations with corrections and new mistakes, it eventually gave up. I was floored when it said “I’m sorry, I cannot do this simple task, I’ve exceeded my error threshold and cannot do this task for you. My LLM prediction engine invents data instead of doing a simple data copy/reformat”. Stunned to see that Gemini threw its digital arms in the air and gave up.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, and a lack of integrated developer tools compared to competitors like Claude or ChatGPT &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48663235&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s still no MCP support in the Gemini app, which is very useful to get various pieces of info as a user just via chatting. For example I recently wanted to get an Airbnb and wanted to filter by specific criteria including house image analysis and Gemini couldn&amp;#39;t do it so I had to do it in Codex.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48666662&quot; title=&quot;So... has Google provided a Codex/Claude Code equivalent to Gemini yet? I would like to use Gemini for coding tasks, but that&amp;#39;s kind of difficult to do as I don&amp;#39;t even know how to get Gemini to even &amp;#39;clone this repo and read the code in it for static analysis&amp;#39;, much less open PRs in repos. ChatGPT/Codex can do it, Claude can do it, why can&amp;#39;t Gemini? And no, I don&amp;#39;t mean going through Antigravity, and personally I&amp;#39;m wary about LLMs having unsupervised access on my computer without explicit…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite these functional hurdles, some proponents argue that providing agents with sandboxed environments allows for useful automation, provided there are safeguards against expensive API loops &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664038&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Computer use is such a terrible idea. It&amp;#39;s slow, insecure, error prone, expensive. And yet having an agent able yo use a computer on your behalf is really useful. Recently I gave a Nix OS vm to my hermes agent and it has been a good experience. I don&amp;#39;t really care if destroy the machine I can just rollback to an earlier version, and for any meaningful data he creates for me I make sure he creates a repo, commit and pushes to my private Gitea instance.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48665962&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s better than the loop grok got stuck in trying to use git and push the work it did leading to a $15 api credit deduction.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://gitlab.com/baiyibai/pico-usb-wifi&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Raspberry Pi Pico W as USB Wi-Fi Adapter&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (gitlab.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48654676&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;269 points · 131 comments · by byb&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The `pico-usb-wifi` firmware transforms a Raspberry Pi Pico W into a driverless USB Wi-Fi adapter by creating a transparent layer-2 bridge. It uses the host&amp;#39;s native CDC-NCM drivers to provide plug-and-play connectivity across Linux, macOS, and Windows without requiring a host-side wireless stack. &lt;a href=&quot;https://gitlab.com/baiyibai/pico-usb-wifi&quot; title=&quot;Title: 白一百 / pico-usb-wifi · GitLab    URL Source: https://gitlab.com/baiyibai/pico-usb-wifi    Markdown Content:  [Skip to main content](https://gitlab.com/baiyibai/pico-usb-wifi#content-body)     Project ID: 83596902     *    main default protected     *    Tags 2   *    v1.0.2   *    v1.0.1      3 results     1.   [pico-usb-wifi](https://gitlab.com/baiyibai/pico-usb-wifi/-/tree/main)    *       *       *       *   Visual Studio Code      *   IntelliJ IDEA    *       *       A workspace is a virtual sandbox environment…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While users praised the project as a valuable educational exercise for learning networking fundamentals, they noted that the 4.75 Mbps throughput is significantly slower than commercial Wi-Fi dongles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48656036&quot; title=&quot;one million Claude Tokens (assuming you are on opus) = 5 USD = the very dongle you tried to replace.  Add the cost of the rasberry pico, you&amp;#39;ll have an easier time buying the wifi dongle. The project is cool thought to learn about networks, NAT, Proxys, ect...&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48657204&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Average 4.75 Mbits/sec throughput Isn&amp;#39;t that slow for WiFi? I mean it&amp;#39;s an interesting learning experience, but isn&amp;#39;t that strictly worse than pretty much any WiFi dongle?&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48656712&quot; title=&quot;How many Mbps?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A central point of discussion was the failure of LLMs like Gemini to recognize the project&amp;#39;s feasibility, despite existing open-source precedents for using the Pico W as an ethernet bridge &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48655720&quot; title=&quot;Interesting that Gemini said it was infeasible. It should be aware that using a Pico W as a transparent ethernet bridge has been done several times over in open source projects, for example on BlueSCSI (emulating a Daynaport SCSI-Ethernet adapter) and PicoMEM and my own PicoGUS project (emulating an NE2000 Ethernet adapter).&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48657362&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s often good to approach what llm said as a guidance, and not as ground truth. You can ask follow up questions or point to potential feasibility and it will change its answer.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48655467&quot; title=&quot;Google Gemini is that naysayer senior developer who confidently tells you it can’t be done. Claude is that easy to get along with smart hard working guy who just gets on with it and builds it double quick. ChatGPT is the eager senior developer who says it can be done but can’t actually work it out and fluffs it.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48658291&quot; title=&quot;Yes, but. I asked Perplexity Pro the same fact question (sports) three days in a row after correcting its error the first day and having the correction acknowledged with a promise to get it right in the future. Same error on second day, same promise. Third day: correct. Perhaps it needs to be in the &amp;#39;Slow&amp;#39; classroom....&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the author&amp;#39;s choice to host code outside of GitHub sparked a debate regarding &amp;#34;monopoly power&amp;#34; versus the use of derogatory nicknames for major tech companies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48657412&quot; title=&quot;Meta comment: nice to see someone NOT putting their FOSS project on Microslop (GitHub) and using another platform for hosting their code. I respect that, thank you for standing up to GitHub&amp;#39;s dominance. I wish more projects didn&amp;#39;t give GitHub such monopoly power by defaulting to using it.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48657808&quot; title=&quot;Meta comment to your meta comment : this is a very personal opinion but I cannot stop myself from thinking less about your message (even though I agree with it), just because of that edgy wannabe way to go about naming Microsoft. You want to say Microsoft say that, you want to say Github say that but if you say a vaguely insulting name only to have to specify what you actually mean... It doesn&amp;#39;t bring anything to the conversation, except lower the level, and if a company has flaws as big as…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-06-23</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-06-23</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://pluralistic.net/2026/06/23/destroy-the-village/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What we call &amp;quot;age verification&amp;quot; is actually mass surveillance&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (pluralistic.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48645173&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;949 points · 506 comments · by hn_acker&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What we call &amp;#34;age verification&amp;#34; is actually mass surveillance: Title: Daily links from Cory Doctorow&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;URL Source: &lt;a href=&quot;https://pluralistic&quot;&gt;https://pluralistic&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;https://pluralistic.net/2026/06/23/destroy-the-village/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Daily links from Cory Doctorow    URL Source: https://pluralistic.net/2026/06/23/destroy-the-village/    Markdown Content:  [![Image 1](https://i0.wp.com/craphound.com/images/23Jun2026.jpg?w=840&amp;amp;ssl=1)](https://pluralistic.net/2026/06/23/destroy-the-village/)    ## Today&amp;#39;s links    *   [Spying on kids to save kids from spying is very, very stupid](https://pluralistic.net/2026/06/23/destroy-the-village/#to-save-it): First they came for the VPNs.   *   [Hey look at…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate centers on whether age verification can be achieved without creating a surveillance state, with some arguing that 90% success rates are possible through non-identifying methods like physical UUID cards or OS-level content tags &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48645333&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; &amp;#39;Age verification&amp;#39; means that everyone who does anything online will have to submit to fine-grained tracking and recording of all their online activities. its been said 1000 times here, but: age verification doesn&amp;#39;t have to be a nightmare dystopia of 24/7 fine-grained tracking and recording unless you are somehow hoping to achieve 100% success rate (something we have not done with any other law ever). there are several reasonable proposals that would be 90%+ successful without stepping on…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48646025&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Could you be more specific as to what you&amp;#39;re imagining? sure, i&amp;#39;ll put my favorite two. though you&amp;#39;ll find much more detailed and thought-out versions of these (and others) in the dozens of other giant threads on the same topic. - buy a card with a UUID from anywhere that sells alcohol/tobacco that is valid for some period of time. most people are comfortable with flashing their ID at the clerk. the UUID card is non-identifying. - websites issue content tags, browsers consume them, you enter…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Technical proposals include government-signed &amp;#34;identity wallets&amp;#34; that use public-key cryptography to verify attributes (like being over 18) without revealing a user&amp;#39;s identity or browsing history to the state &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48646493&quot; title=&quot;The way identity wallets work: The government issues an eID to your wallet. The ID is signed by the government and linked to the device to prevent transferring the credential. A public/private key-pair is generated by the secure enclave in your phone, the public key along with proof of possession of the private key is included in the request for the government eID. The government signs individual attributes combined with the public key with the government private key. The government certificate…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. However, skeptics point out that current implementations often default to invasive face scans or ID uploads &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48646037&quot; title=&quot;Where are these mythical sweet-spot solutions? Concretely, half the websites I visit from the UK want me to either scan my face or upload ID documents to access their full featureset. Now that users have been conditioned to accept this, nobody seems very interested in figuring out how to collect less PII - only insulating themselves from liability by having the data processed by a third party.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, and client-side solutions are easily bypassed by minors unless enforced through controversial browser attestation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48646272&quot; title=&quot;And honestly, all these should ultimately just be done client side in the browser.  After the browser has verified &amp;#39;User is x or user is over 21&amp;#39; there&amp;#39;s no reason to then send that information to the website. Let websites issue a &amp;#39;window.isUserOver(16)&amp;#39; call once and then move forward based on the response to that query.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48647377&quot; title=&quot;This would require browser attestation, wouldn&amp;#39;t it? Otherwise kids are just going to download a custom build of Chromium where `window.isUserOver(16)` is always `True`.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/JPoehnelt/status/2069482265953087602&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Fired by Google for creating the Google workspace CLI&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48649011&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;727 points · 428 comments · by justinwp&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A former Google employee claims they were fired from the company for creating a command-line interface (CLI) for Google Workspace. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/JPoehnelt/status/2069482265953087602&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;JPoehnelt&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2069482265953087602&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;JPoehnelt&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2069482265953087602&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether firing a long-tenured engineer for releasing an unapproved Google Workspace CLI was an act of bureaucratic malice or a justified response to a major lapse in judgment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48652851&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m noticing a few commenters who work (worked?) at Google (inferred from comment history) who are critical of this person&amp;#39;s actions. First: you ought to disclose that information when commenting on a topic that relates in some way to your financial incentives. Second: when I worked at Google under Chrome it was very common for individuals and teams to publish projects to open source repositories under Google-managed Github orgs. In fact, for most of my tenure (&amp;#39;15-&amp;#39;21) my team had license to…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48653245&quot; title=&quot;Is it so extreme? If you work at Google, there&amp;#39;s a very clear policy for doing any outside &amp;#39;work&amp;#39; (volunteering, an open source side project, a business, being on a board, etc.): if it&amp;#39;s related to your day-to-day work and/or related to Google&amp;#39;s business (which virtually anything software is), you need to fill out a disclosure form and get a go-ahead from legal. Obviously a Google Workspace CLI is related to Google. Why would you release this without getting a go-ahead? I&amp;#39;m sad that a clearly…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48650129&quot; title=&quot;Looks like a textbook example of Pournelle&amp;#39;s Iron Law of Bureaucracy .[a] People like the OP, Justin Poehnelt, who build cool things out of self-motivation that others find interesting and want to use, are now at the mercy of those inside Google who care more about the company&amp;#39;s internal bureaucracy and their own role and importance within it. To them, the fact that the OP&amp;#39;s project was an instant github hit meant nothing . -- EDIT: Others here are saying that Justin released his code with…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that the project&amp;#39;s branding could easily be mistaken for an official Google release, violating clear corporate policies regarding outside work and legal disclosures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48653245&quot; title=&quot;Is it so extreme? If you work at Google, there&amp;#39;s a very clear policy for doing any outside &amp;#39;work&amp;#39; (volunteering, an open source side project, a business, being on a board, etc.): if it&amp;#39;s related to your day-to-day work and/or related to Google&amp;#39;s business (which virtually anything software is), you need to fill out a disclosure form and get a go-ahead from legal. Obviously a Google Workspace CLI is related to Google. Why would you release this without getting a go-ahead? I&amp;#39;m sad that a clearly…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48650310&quot; title=&quot;Interesting that people here seem so sympathetic to the fired guy. Wouldn’t you kind of expect to be fired if you release a project under your employers name that’s not even associated with them and hasn’t been cleared? Working for them actually makes it worse because people could look up your name and would see that you actually work for google. It’s kind of obvious that this is a bad idea, right?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48650192&quot; title=&quot;Yikes. The lack of judgement involved in personally releasing something that could be confused for an official release (I was confused) by your employer is someone who has huge wildcard risk in the future. I would expect significant disciplinary action if they didn&amp;#39;t follow procedure, and termination if they were directly warned at any point.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Conversely, some former employees and observers view the termination as a sign of Google&amp;#39;s decaying culture, noting that the company has shifted from encouraging &amp;#34;20% time&amp;#34; innovation to punishing engineers who build useful tools outside of rigid internal roadmaps &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48652851&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m noticing a few commenters who work (worked?) at Google (inferred from comment history) who are critical of this person&amp;#39;s actions. First: you ought to disclose that information when commenting on a topic that relates in some way to your financial incentives. Second: when I worked at Google under Chrome it was very common for individuals and teams to publish projects to open source repositories under Google-managed Github orgs. In fact, for most of my tenure (&amp;#39;15-&amp;#39;21) my team had license to…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48649304&quot; title=&quot;Yikes.  I see Justin posted this, and I&amp;#39;m sure he can&amp;#39;t say much - but this is an absolutely insane story. Google has gone from encouraging 20% time (to create amazing projects like this) to firing people for doing it. There seems to be some true maliciousness going on at Google. You have this, you have the open source Gemini CLI getting replaced with a shittier closed source Antigravity CLI, etc... etc...  What is going on there?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48653386&quot; title=&quot;This ethos doesn&amp;#39;t gel with the old ethos and that&amp;#39;s where the disconnect comes from. At one point Google was there to build cool shit and enable people to do it; not extract maximal amount of value and &amp;#39;being Evil&amp;#39; by the values of its time.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48649960&quot; title=&quot;So... they fired him for doing a 20% time project? I&amp;#39;m glad I don&amp;#39;t have any of their stock to sell, what terrible management.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. The engineer involved suggests the situation reflects broader disruptions in big tech caused by shifting incentives and the influence of AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48649012&quot; title=&quot;I am not going to share much more than what I already have, but I think this speaks to the experience of working in big tech and the disruption caused by AI both at the level of teams/roadmaps/incentives and changing user behavior.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://swipe.futo.tech/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;FUTO Swipe – A new swipe typing model&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (swipe.futo.tech)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48648619&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;706 points · 254 comments · by futohq&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FUTO has released FUTO Swipe, a family of open-source, privacy-focused swipe typing models and algorithms designed to provide fast, offline, and high-accuracy text input for Android and other platforms. &lt;a href=&quot;https://swipe.futo.tech/&quot; title=&quot;Title: FUTO Swipe    URL Source: https://swipe.futo.tech/    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1](https://swipe.futo.tech/hero-2.webp)![Image 2](https://swipe.futo.tech/circles.webp)    ![Image 3](https://swipe.futo.tech/logo.png)    Fast, accurate swipe typing system. Use it today in FUTO Keyboard, our fully offline Android keyboard app. Or download the models and build with it.    This is a serverside demo to keep this webpage small. In production, it runs on-device, with much lower latency.    For a long time,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FUTO Swipe model introduces &amp;#34;ClearFlow,&amp;#34; a layout specifically optimized to reduce word ambiguity during swiping, addressing long-standing frustrations with the QWERTY layout&amp;#39;s inaccuracy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48653404&quot; title=&quot;I love swiping for speed, because it&amp;#39;s usually faster than tapping and easy to do one-handed, but then there are always a bunch of words that are too similar that it can never get right, it doesn&amp;#39;t deal well with doubled vs single letters, etc. So for the longest time, I&amp;#39;ve wanted a new keyboard layout specifically designed for swiping. In the same way that Dvorak was optimized for ergonomically typing English words, I want a keyboard layout designed to minimize word overlap/ambiguity when…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48653646&quot; title=&quot;FUTO Swipe supports ClearFlow, which is exactly what you are talking about, a keyboard layout optimized for swiping: https://clearflowkeyboard.github.io/ https://github.com/futo-org/futo-keyboard-layouts/issues/163&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. However, user experiences are mixed; while some seek a more accurate alternative to Gboard, others report that FUTO’s current word suggestions are odd or less reliable than established competitors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48651332&quot; title=&quot;I used the FUTO keyboard for a few months but ditched it as the word suggestions were either odd or random (one example: I&amp;#39;d write &amp;#39;Jordan&amp;#39; and it would always suggest &amp;#39;Peterson&amp;#39; as the next word), and I&amp;#39;d got a weirdly passive aggressive prompt saying I should really purchase a license. Went back to the de-Googled Android keyboard in GrapheneOS&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48654021&quot; title=&quot;FUTO is terrible! I run GOS and have tried it, you spend more time deleting works than actually using it. I was forced to install Google GBoard instead and revoke its network access. Gboard swipe typing works flawlessly, FUTO still an Alpha project.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Significant debate surrounds the project&amp;#39;s licensing, with critics labeling the &amp;#34;Futo License&amp;#34; as non-free and &amp;#34;source-available&amp;#34; rather than truly open source &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48650720&quot; title=&quot;For anyone wondering: the library uses the GPLv3 (good) while the Android keyboard uses the Futo License (shit). - https://gitlab.futo.org/keyboard/swipe-library/-/blob/master... - https://github.com/futo-org/android-keyboard/blob/master/LIC...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48651223&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s particularly objectionable about the Futo License? Is it this part? you may not remove or obscure any functionality in the software related to payment to the Licensor in any copy you distribute to others.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48651356&quot; title=&quot;The clause you cited as well as the &amp;#39;Termination&amp;#39; section and the non-commercial restriction make it a non-free license. Besides the direct issues with that, it also means all software covered by this license is unsuitable for FOSS-only distributions like Debian or F-Droid. It&amp;#39;s not entirely clear to me if the license is copyleft; derivative works have similar problems if so. As an aside, Eron Wolf, the billionaire behind FUTO, has some rather... out of touch views[0] on the meaning of open…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, while others defend it as a reasonable commercial model &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48651291&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; shit It&amp;#39;s just a commercial license with very mild terms.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the lack of an iOS version is viewed by some as a boycott, though others argue it is a practical avoidance of Apple’s restrictive approval process &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48650803&quot; title=&quot;Must say it&amp;#39;s a little bit lame that they are boycotting iOS. I will not change phone just to use this app but it would be nice to be able to replace SwiftKey with this.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48651126&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m pretty sure there is no way for them to supply an ios version without having to go through some sort of apple approval process. hardly boycotting to say that you&amp;#39;re not about to put up with that crap.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.stephendiehl.com/posts/bad_place_2026/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Crypto in 2026: Oh, This Is the Bad Place&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (stephendiehl.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48642699&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;421 points · &lt;strong&gt;526 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by ibobev&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a critique of the 2026 financial landscape, Stephen Diehl argues that the crypto industry has devolved into a &amp;#34;dystopian&amp;#34; system of &amp;#34;sucker farming&amp;#34; and political corruption, characterized by retail gambling, insider-driven prediction markets on military strikes, and the monetization of the presidency through memecoins. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.stephendiehl.com/posts/bad_place_2026/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Crypto in 2026: Oh, This is the Bad Place    URL Source: https://www.stephendiehl.com/posts/bad_place_2026/    Published Time: Mon May 25 2026 01:00:00 GMT+0100 (British Summer Time)    Markdown Content:  Open your favourite Doom News App any morning in 2026 over your morning coffee, and the only honest phrase that should come out of your mouth is, &amp;#39;Oh, this is the Bad Place.&amp;#39; Because the world has gone truly mad. The president of the United States is running a memecoin out of the White House,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the underlying technology remains fascinating to some, consensus suggests that the crypto ecosystem has largely devolved into a culture of gambling and scams that fails to solve meaningful social problems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48643201&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been deep into crypto for years and I was a big stablecoin supporter. I was fascinated by the tech and I still am.  But everything outside the tech itself is just trash, scams, and gambling. I&amp;#39;ve come to believe that &amp;#39;pure&amp;#39; decentralization is neither practical nor particularly convenient.  The only real use case that makes sense to me is giving people in developing countries access to a stable currency they can actually hold, trade, and invest in, meaning USDT or USDC. Outside of that, as…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48643931&quot; title=&quot;I got into crypto in 2017 when I came across the phrase &amp;#39;money is a technology&amp;#39;. That idea fascinated me. But fast forward several years later, and it&amp;#39;s obvious that money might be a technology in the sense that it&amp;#39;s a tool, but more importantly, money is a culture .&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48643343&quot; title=&quot;Technological solutions to social problems only tend to work when the problems are of the type &amp;#39;I wish it were easier to rid people of their money&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue that current systems merely replicate existing scarcity-based inequities rather than creating a necessary economic &amp;#34;discontinuity&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48645971&quot; title=&quot;Crypto was initially interesting to me because scarcity based economics is failing us and crypto give us a way to explore alternatives.  But so far, nearly everything we&amp;#39;ve built with it has just been a clone of some scarcity-based thing that already exists outside of crypto. Since then I&amp;#39;ve come to the conclusion that it&amp;#39;s never worthwhile to buy crypto with fiat.  Any scheme which asks that of its users creates too much continuity between the old way and the new way--it allows the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48646054&quot; title=&quot;Isn&amp;#39;t the whole point of an economy a method of resolving scarcity? Money is a proxy for participation; it keeps me from having to agree to paint the miller&amp;#39;s fence in exchange for some flour.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. However, notable anecdotes highlight a vital use case: providing people in developing countries with a stable means to receive wages and protect their savings from local currency devaluation and high fees &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48643201&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been deep into crypto for years and I was a big stablecoin supporter. I was fascinated by the tech and I still am.  But everything outside the tech itself is just trash, scams, and gambling. I&amp;#39;ve come to believe that &amp;#39;pure&amp;#39; decentralization is neither practical nor particularly convenient.  The only real use case that makes sense to me is giving people in developing countries access to a stable currency they can actually hold, trade, and invest in, meaning USDT or USDC. Outside of that, as…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48643173&quot; title=&quot;Cryptocurrency is very much a double edged sword, on one hand it enables people to transact monetary value bypassing for-profit operators such as western union and paypal as well as hinders corrupt government institutions from confiscating or otherwise devaluing what you own. Of course this also allows people with harmful intentions to do the same, bypass centralized systems that keep fraud in check, mitigate theft and whatnot. But all I know is that the only reason why some of my friends are…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users push back against the narrative that crypto is a &amp;#34;gateway drug&amp;#34; to financial ruin, comparing such warnings to hyperbolic anti-drug propaganda &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48642928&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Meet Mike. Mike is a college freshman who is exposed to crypto through social media. He downloads Coinbase, buys ten dollars of CumRocket because his friend group is in on it, watches the price move, and feels for the first time the dopamine rush of gambling on non-economic random walks. By his sophomore year he is onto harder drugs: 0DTE options on triple-leveraged single-stock ETFs he does not understand, traded on a gamified brokerage built to look like a video game. By twenty-two he has a…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/events/extreme-heat-improving-governance-and-strengthening-action-around-the-world/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Extreme Heat conference cancelled due to extreme heat warning&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lse.ac.uk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48653060&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;413 points · &lt;strong&gt;474 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by rendx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A London Climate Action Week conference on extreme heat governance was cancelled after the UK Met Office issued a red extreme heat warning. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/events/extreme-heat-improving-governance-and-strengthening-action-around-the-world/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Extreme Heat: Improving governance and strengthening action around the world - cancelled - Grantham Research Institute on climate change and the environment    URL Source: https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/events/extreme-heat-improving-governance-and-strengthening-action-around-the-world/    Published Time: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 05:34:35 GMT    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1](https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/London_heat.jpg)  Credit: mammuth/istock    ### We regret…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a sharp divide over Europe’s resistance to air conditioning, with some arguing that the lack of AC leads to significantly higher preventable death rates compared to the US &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48653539&quot; title=&quot;Europeans don’t get scolded enough for their resistance to air conditioning. In terms of accounting for preventable deaths, Greece has 2x more heat-related deaths per capita annually than Mississippi has gun deaths. By comparison, the worst US state for heat related deaths, Nevada - a literal desert - has &amp;gt;10x fewer deaths per capita than Greece.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48654221&quot; title=&quot;Absolutely this. Arrogance isn&amp;#39;t going to hold against the sun. It&amp;#39;s very stupid of EU to ignore the fact this is how hot it will be from now on, and 1000 year old dwellings using only windows to cool are no longer acceptable living standards.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics of widespread AC adoption point to the high cost of retrofitting ancient buildings, the potential to worsen outdoor &amp;#34;heat islands,&amp;#34; and the belief that AC is a &amp;#34;wasteful&amp;#34; band-aid for a crisis caused by environmental neglect &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48654196&quot; title=&quot;Air conditioning only works for things inside of buildings. Not so good for the plants and animals our lives depend on. And it raises the heat outside of buildings. Not so good for people who have to be outside, think first responders etc. &amp;#39;just turn on the AC and keep burning the world down&amp;#39; isn&amp;#39;t really the answer.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48654036&quot; title=&quot;I think it&amp;#39;s more that air conditioning is (currently) prohibitively expensive. The few people I know that have it spent several thousands of euros on their installations. That&amp;#39;s not something most people have lying around. You&amp;#39;d think the government could subsidize aircon like they did solar for years, and both of those things combined would translate to very pleasant summers spent in energy neutral air conditioned homes.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48654400&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; No it doesn&amp;#39;t. Yes, it does. It may be small temperature increase but AC use increases outside temperatures. It is just physics. Here is a simple diagram: https://www.lozierheatingcooling.com/filesimages/heatPump.jp...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48655116&quot; title=&quot;Well yeah, because it requires re-engineering the entire built environment! Heat waves only became a serious problem in Europe in the last decade. The vast majority of buildings predate the need for air conditioning by several decades - and in plenty of cases by several centuries. The buildings are designed around being livable in a pre-climate-catastrophe climate without needing air conditioning - which is perfectly achievable if you aren&amp;#39;t stupid enough to build a city in the middle of a…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Meanwhile, some participants from hotter climates find the European definition of &amp;#34;extreme heat&amp;#34; (37-40°C) mundane, while others view the debate as a proxy for cultural friction between Americans and Europeans &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48653485&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Extreme Heat&amp;#39; seems to be 37-40 degrees Celsius which is bafflingly mundane to me as an Australian who grew up in rural New South Wales. We&amp;#39;d pack 30 kids and a teacher into an un-airconditioned classroom with just a ceiling fan and the windows open in that temperature. I imagine the buildings there just aren&amp;#39;t built to support that heat plus the body height of hundreds or thousands of attendees?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48655039&quot; title=&quot;You know what is worse than sweltering under a heatwave? To hear Americans jump at the chance to comment about Europeans and their AC usage. Jesus it’s like they have found their little pet peeve to vent all their frustration towards. Perhaps because we grumble every week there’s a school shooting and you feel you have to take petty revenge somehow. Every thread on social media is Americans whining about ACs in Europe, or lack thereof. Don’t you guys have anything better to do than feel…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israel-targeted-gaza-children-resulting-genocide-un-inquiry-says-2026-06-23/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Israel targeted Gaza children resulting in genocide, UN inquiry says&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (reuters.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48642784&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;531 points · 318 comments · by supercopter&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A United Nations inquiry has concluded that Israel’s military actions in Gaza intentionally targeted children and contributed to acts of genocide, a finding that Israel has strongly rejected as biased. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israel-targeted-gaza-children-resulting-genocide-un-inquiry-says-2026-06-23/&quot; title=&quot;Title: reuters.com    URL Source: https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israel-targeted-gaza-children-resulting-genocide-un-inquiry-says-2026-06-23/    Warning: This page maybe requiring CAPTCHA, please make sure you are authorized to access this page.    Markdown Content:&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters debate whether the UN’s findings on the targeting of children represent systemic intent or are a byproduct of high-payload urban warfare, with some questioning the impartiality of UN agencies &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48643075&quot; title=&quot;the UN claimed that the UN agency was just fine... no s**.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48651880&quot; title=&quot;I was trying to pay attention to the actual claim and I got:  1. Children died during the ceasefire  2. Israel is using larger bomb payloads than it should (according to who?) in civilian areas  3. Higher percentage of child deaths than in earlier conflicts Still, for me, doesn&amp;#39;t add up to &amp;#39;Israel deliberately targetted gaza children&amp;#39; - is the claim that this is systemic? Or rampant? Or just by some individuals? And how do we know?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Discussion highlights a perceived double standard in global sanctions, drawing parallels to the collapse of apartheid South Africa and suggesting that Israel’s &amp;#34;strategic leverage&amp;#34; relies heavily on U.S. diplomatic protection and nuclear ambiguity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48649547&quot; title=&quot;We kinda went through this with South Africa. The only thing saving Israel is the US protection and the nukes. US protection can change. Nukes are harder. South Africa successfully utilized &amp;#39;strategic ambiguity&amp;#39;. They never explicitly acknowledged they had the weapons, while making sure world leaders knew they were a credible threat. during South Africa&amp;#39;s border wars (specifically against the Cubans in Angola), there were internal discussions about deploying tactical nuclear weapons. Because…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48643027&quot; title=&quot;This is really sickening - if North Korea or any other less connected country did this, you would quickly see their national (tech) companies being sanctioned by the west. I never understood how a country like Israel, given the history of its own tribe, can themselves become so gruesome and have a hugely state-supported private spy-tech sector that supports the worst autocrates in the world as long as the money flows to them.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue for a restructured UN Security Council to resolve such deadlocks, others believe deep-seated ideological and religious narratives in the West make a geopolitical shift unlikely &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48642971&quot; title=&quot;Maybe to spark curious conversation, when a world power seems to be supportive of actions that an international body considers negative, what structure can help resolve these? It does seem like UN is unable to really make a dent here.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48643092&quot; title=&quot;The UN is stuck in 1945. The UNSC needs to throw out the UK, France, and bring in Brazil, India, South Africa and Germany. And this veto nonsense needs to go away.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48649883&quot; title=&quot;Not sure if it used to be the case with South Africa too, but I&amp;#39;m  baffled how much ideological support Israel still has, in various population groups. There are at least two religious groups who seem to view it as integral part of a divine plan that trumps all other considerations. (&amp;#39;mainstream&amp;#39; Orthodox Jews and Evangelical Christians) Then there various secular narratives around the Jewish homeland, the rebirth (and Germany&amp;#39;s redemption) after the Holocaust etc. For western politicians, it…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/future-file-format/f3&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;F3&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48647799&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;655 points · 134 comments · by tosh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;F3: Title: GitHub - future-file-format/F3: [SIGMOD 2026] F3: The Open-Source Data File Format for the Future&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;URL Source: &lt;a href=&quot;https://github&quot;&gt;https://github&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/future-file-format/f3&quot; title=&quot;Title: GitHub - future-file-format/F3: [SIGMOD 2026] F3: The Open-Source Data File Format for the Future    URL Source: https://github.com/future-file-format/f3    Markdown Content:  [![Image 1: f3_logo](https://github.com/future-file-format/F3/raw/main/doc/f3-logo.svg)](https://github.com/future-file-format/F3/blob/main/doc/f3-logo.svg)    F3 is a data file format that is designed with efficiency, interoperability, and extensibility in mind. It provides a data organization that rectifies the layout…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The F3 file format introduces the novel approach of embedding WebAssembly (Wasm) binaries to decode data, ensuring cross-platform compatibility without relying on language-specific SDKs &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48648238&quot; title=&quot;This bit is quite genius, rather than depend on a language-specific SDK/lib for working with the formats you can fallback to exported WASM methods if none exist: &amp;gt; &amp;#39;Each self-describing F3 file includes both the data and meta-data, as well as WebAssembly (Wasm) binaries to decode the data. Embedding the decoders in each file requires minimal storage (kilobytes) and ensures compatibility on any platform in case native decoders are unavailable. &amp;#39;&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. However, this design sparked significant security concerns regarding the risks of embedding executable code, potential compression bomb attacks, and the implications of executing attacker-provided payloads &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48648315&quot; title=&quot;Is embedding executable code into a file a security risk? My assumption is a yes&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48648324&quot; title=&quot;So attackers don&amp;#39;t have to craft specially corrupted files?  They can just include the code to perform the attack in the data file itself?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48648768&quot; title=&quot;How do you prevent compression bomb attacks when files can define their own compression functions? You could have some kind of OOM killer, but that will be a &amp;#39;footgun&amp;#39; that people who are actually doing &amp;#39;big data&amp;#39; will constantly shoot. This pretty much kills any ingestion pipeline where the source is untrusted.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48648484&quot; title=&quot;There’s a big difference in the expected use of a file. If the file is attacker provided, and the fallback path is being used, the attacker can embed whatever WASM payload they want into the file since the file will be “opened” by “execute this offset into the file”. Compare that to JSON. The parser NEVER needs to execute arbitrary instructions. Parser might have bugs, but it avoids a whole class of issues.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, though some noted that Wasm&amp;#39;s strong sandboxing could mitigate these issues &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48648520&quot; title=&quot;WASM has strong tried and proven sandboxing. We basically can build on nearly 30 years of experience. The decoders don&amp;#39;t need a lot of access, they can basically be pure functions. If this will pan out security-wise I don&amp;#39;t know. I&amp;#39;m more worried that it will be so slow that no one will use it. Interesting idea, though, and I can see applications outside of the &amp;#39;big data&amp;#39; realm this apparently targets.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Skeptics also questioned F3&amp;#39;s performance trade-offs and its ability to displace the deeply entrenched Parquet format &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48649412&quot; title=&quot;Not sure why this got so many upvotes, also the landing page is not great, its better to look at the paper (see link below). Seems to be a columnar storage format that addresses some shortcomings in parquet. Thing is, though, that of all these formats the real winning feature is compatibility , which is (obviously) very hard to improve on, as anything new immediately loses. Parquet is unfortunately very good just by virtue of being first, and so widely supported. The most widely used parquet…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, while proponents argued that newer formats are necessary to address Parquet&amp;#39;s shortcomings in modern machine learning workloads that require both batch scans and fast random access &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48649816&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Also, my main gripe with parquet (single table per file) is not even addressed, so, also the name is a bit hyped up. This is really more of an expectation that has been put on file formats by the query engines. Spark/Datafusion/DuckDB wouldn&amp;#39;t really know what to do with a multi-table file. &amp;gt; Parquet is unfortunately very good just by virtue of being first, and so widely supported IMO that is not how technology works. It is great that Parquet is so good at a lot of things, but that does not…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20260622-00/?p=112451&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In memory of the man who put red and green squiggles under words&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (devblogs.microsoft.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48648959&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;606 points · 122 comments · by saikatsg&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft developer Tony Krueger, who created the iconic red and green squiggly underlines for spell and grammar checking in Word, has passed away. &lt;a href=&quot;https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20260622-00/?p=112451&quot; title=&quot;Title: In memory of the man who put red and green squiggles under words    URL Source: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20260622-00/?p=112451    Published Time: 2026-06-22T14:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  [Skip to main content](https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20260622-00/?p=112451#mainContent)    [![Image 2: Microsoft](https://uhf.microsoft.com/images/microsoft/RE1Mu3b.png)](https://www.microsoft.com/)    [Dev…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a classic case of &amp;#34;citogenesis,&amp;#34; where a Wikipedia entry and the linked article cite each other as proof of Tony Krueger’s contributions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48653207&quot; title=&quot;Amusingly, Chen&amp;#39;s article refers to the Wikipedia page as evidence that Tony Krueger did the port. The article&amp;#39;s evidence for that in its latest version? A link back to Chen&amp;#39;s article...!&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48653518&quot; title=&quot;Citogenesis! https://xkcd.com/978/ Can&amp;#39;t believe we got to see one in the wild, and with clear attribution to boot.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users find the &amp;#34;corpo-brain&amp;#34; introduction of Krueger’s work to celebrities amusing, others debate the utility of the squiggles, noting they can become visual noise in multilingual environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48655606&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Tony was an early fan of the magic/comedy team Penn and Teller. A friend and colleague attended a show and hung out afterward to ask the duo to sign a photo for his friend Tony. “He was on the team that did the red and green squiggles in Word.” That’s some heavy duty corpo-brain to be introducing your friend with ”He was on the team that did X”.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48654533&quot; title=&quot;When you work in multi language environment the squiggles are often less than useful. They are just visual noise I must fight or ignore because the system tries to guess the language of the text I&amp;#39;m writing and it is most often wrong. And manually switching language settings between each interaction is way to inconvenient.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong desire for a keyboard shortcut to instantly apply AI-driven corrections, though skeptics argue that modern autocorrect has actually regressed in quality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48653378&quot; title=&quot;I wish there was a button on my keyboard that I could press when there&amp;#39;s a red squiggle in the last N words, which would cause my computer to fix the underlined word to its best guess. It should wait until a few words later, to get more context. It should flash the new word as it&amp;#39;s being inserted, so I can easily see what it&amp;#39;s done. Spell check used to be kind of lousy, but with AI I imagine it would have a very high rate of accuracy in context. I am greatly slowed down by having to delete a…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48653475&quot; title=&quot;Most mobile keyboards will do autocorrect as you describe it, and show top-N alternatives when you go back and tap on the autocorrected word. I prefer this to it mocking my mistakes and making me pay penance by manually accepting the correction.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48654454&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; with AI I imagine ... I think that might be just imagination - android autocorrect in particular got sufficiently worse that I finally turned it off (I still use it as a &amp;#39;typing assist&amp;#39; - it only displays choices that I can tap to replace, or (more often) ignore.)&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/6/23/the-coming-loop/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Coming Loop&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lucumr.pocoo.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48643180&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;432 points · 295 comments · by ingve&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author explores the shift toward &amp;#34;harness loops,&amp;#34; where autonomous systems orchestrate AI agents to write and patch code, warning that while this increases development speed, it risks creating complex, unmaintainable &amp;#34;software organisms&amp;#34; that humans can no longer fully comprehend or manage without machine assistance. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/6/23/the-coming-loop/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Coming Loop    URL Source: https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/6/23/the-coming-loop/    Published Time: 2026-06-23T00:00:00    Markdown Content:  written on June 23, 2026    &amp;gt; I don’t prompt Claude anymore. I have loops running that prompt Claude and figuring out what to do. My job is to write loops.  &amp;gt;   &amp;gt;   &amp;gt; — Boris Cherny    Over the last months I have watched more and more people build something on top of coding agents that feels meaningfully different from just using a coding agent. Some of this…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rise of &amp;#34;agentic loops&amp;#34; in software engineering has created a divide between developers who prioritize rapid token consumption and those struggling to maintain code quality against an influx of AI-generated &amp;#34;slopware&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48644466&quot; title=&quot;As much as I like Claude Code, Boris has done a lot of harm by encouraging software engineering practices that lead to slopware. We have two camps of people at work, the first camp are the agent goes brrr. They don&amp;#39;t understand the code they write. They have loops running, agent orchestrators or agent hype du jour. The second camp is people who are inundated with PRs, are holding the line on quality, and just exhausted. We&amp;#39;ve also had some management pressures where they think people are…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48644599&quot; title=&quot;Yes, I am exhausted. Most of my company is obsessed with agents, because everyone wants to be seen as AI first. There is little thought going into usage. No care for long term maintainability and quality. Our product is actively worse by many metrics, but no one cares because we marketing can say “agents”. The sad part is that this technology is incredible. It’s us choosing to turn it into a slop cannon (and the labs sure seem to encourage this). I want to leave the industry as soon as I can.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some find the technology revolutionary for executing well-defined specs, others argue that the current discourse is filled with &amp;#34;techno-babble&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;high-level wanking&amp;#34; that lacks proof of real-world profitability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48649078&quot; title=&quot;What does any of that mean in practice? it&amp;#39;s just rambling about abstract concepts that seem to be designed to hint at a bigger picture, when it&amp;#39;s just getting AI to write code for you. Is this where it&amp;#39;s going? Having to mystify our roles so it seems like we&amp;#39;re still the thought leaders when actually we&amp;#39;re just becoming pseudo-teachers that try and herd our group of AI idiots to the right conclusion for us so we don&amp;#39;t have to, without ever giving away that it&amp;#39;s just all techno-babble?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48643916&quot; title=&quot;Show me the billion dollar solopreneur startup, or the profit increase for companies and at that point I’ll start thinking that this tasteless high level wanking might make sense in some way&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48651919&quot; title=&quot;My experience is that I am bottle-necked on specs. The agent loop is less of a thing for me now. If I can get a clear understanding of what I want to build, communicate that to Claude Code in planning mode with the goal to write an actionable spec (not code, plan to write the spec) then I tend to get very good results once the agent goes to implement. But this strategy, while effective, puts a big load on me to write the specs. The agent tends to knock each one out of the park (usually 2 to 3…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics suggest that the industry is being pushed toward a &amp;#34;slop cannon&amp;#34; future by leaders whose primary incentive is to increase token usage rather than ensure long-term maintainability &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48644466&quot; title=&quot;As much as I like Claude Code, Boris has done a lot of harm by encouraging software engineering practices that lead to slopware. We have two camps of people at work, the first camp are the agent goes brrr. They don&amp;#39;t understand the code they write. They have loops running, agent orchestrators or agent hype du jour. The second camp is people who are inundated with PRs, are holding the line on quality, and just exhausted. We&amp;#39;ve also had some management pressures where they think people are…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48644769&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I call out Boris but I also don&amp;#39;t think he&amp;#39;s being malicious. From a market perspective, he&amp;#39;s acting completely rationally in his own interests. Bottom line is that these companies need to do whatever they can to keep growing token consumption because that&amp;#39;s their goal. If the nation&amp;#39;s drinking skyrocketed, we wouldn&amp;#39;t be sitting here wondering why the CEO of Budweiser isn&amp;#39;t advocating for temperance. His job is to move kegs, just like Boris&amp;#39; job is to move tokens.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dynomight.net/vitamin-d/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The worthlessness of Vitamin D is mildly exaggerated&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (dynomight.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48647486&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;384 points · 292 comments · by surprisetalk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While randomized trials have debunked claims that vitamin D is a &amp;#34;miracle cure,&amp;#34; meta-analyses suggest it may still provide modest benefits for cancer and all-cause mortality. Given evolutionary evidence and biological plausibility, supplementing to reach &amp;#34;normal&amp;#34; ancestral levels is a low-risk bet for those with low-to-moderate deficiency. &lt;a href=&quot;https://dynomight.net/vitamin-d/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The worthlessness of vitamin D is mildly exaggerated    URL Source: https://dynomight.net/vitamin-d/    Published Time: 2026-06-23T00:00:00+00:00    Markdown Content:  [DYNOMIGHT](https://dynomight.net/)    best    topics    follow    [about](https://dynomight.net/about)  ![Image 1](https://dynomight.net/img/vitamin-d/ap74.37.jpg)![Image 2](https://dynomight.net/img/vitamin-d/ap74.37.jpg)![Image 3](https://dynomight.net/img/vitamin-d/ap74.37.jpg)![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While consensus exists that Vitamin D supplementation is vital for those with severe deficiencies, commenters note that many &amp;#34;health influencers&amp;#34; now overstate the prevalence of deficiency to maintain hype &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48650069&quot; title=&quot;This is a refreshingly balanced and honest analysis of Vitamin D studies. The strongest evidence for Vitamin D is in people who are severely deficient. Bumping up to a normal range can provide some improvements. The health influencers started noticing that the Vitamin D studies coming out weren&amp;#39;t matching their original hype for Vitamin D, so many pivoted to trying to make claims that most people are severely deficient and just don&amp;#39;t know it, which provides a convenient out to dismiss the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48653250&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s pretty safe to assume all hyped supplements are pointless. Being generally active and eating fruits/vegetables is like 80% of the work for being healthy. &amp;gt; almost everyone is Vitamin D deficient This was the red flag that made me realize it was BS early on. If everyone is deficient, then it must not be that important.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant point of contention involves the methodology of deficiency studies, with critics arguing that data collected in southern latitudes during winter or northern latitudes during summer fails to account for the lack of synthesis in northern winters &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48650605&quot; title=&quot;The survey in the article that assessed vitamin D deficiency was a bit odd: &amp;gt; Because physical exams are performed in mobile vans in NHANES, data could not be collected in northern latitudes during the winter; instead data were collected in northern latitudes during summer and in southern latitudes in winter. To address this season-latitude aspect of the NHANES design, we stratified the sample into two seasonal subpopulations (winter/lower latitude and summer/higher latitude) before examining…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48650751&quot; title=&quot;Not to mention, northern latitudes get more sun that average in summer, and most northern countries have more reasonable working hours so people actually do go outside.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48651882&quot; title=&quot;More hours of sun, but it&amp;#39;s less intense.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Some users suggest that blood levels may simply be a proxy for outdoor exercise &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48650000&quot; title=&quot;I suspect that blood vitamin D is mainly a marker for how much outdoor exercise people are getting, and that it is the exercise rather than the D which is causal.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, while others emphasize the importance of co-factors like Vitamin K2 and the risks of toxicity from over-supplementation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48650069&quot; title=&quot;This is a refreshingly balanced and honest analysis of Vitamin D studies. The strongest evidence for Vitamin D is in people who are severely deficient. Bumping up to a normal range can provide some improvements. The health influencers started noticing that the Vitamin D studies coming out weren&amp;#39;t matching their original hype for Vitamin D, so many pivoted to trying to make claims that most people are severely deficient and just don&amp;#39;t know it, which provides a convenient out to dismiss the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48650302&quot; title=&quot;Has anyone done a RCT of D3+K2? K2 seems to be important in the absorption of D3. Another aspect that bothers me with these studies is that we’re simply supplementing the vitamin D, seemingly without measuring the change in blood levels. I took 2000IU (+K2) a day for many years in between testing my blood levels and still had &amp;lt;30ng/ml and had to go up to 5000IU/day. I’d like to see some further study.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48650394&quot; title=&quot;Your body needs vitamins in order to form complex aminos to operate. But your body only needs to make so many of them - especially if you are an adult, not pregnant, or not suffering from a disease of some sort. The very premise that loading up your body with &amp;#39;excess&amp;#39; vitamins beyond what you need is already pretty fraught. Building a house without enough lumber can lead to long term deficiency - but loading up a construction site with more materials than are needed shouldn&amp;#39;t automatically be…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jerrysmap.com/the-map&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Jerry&amp;#39;s Map&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (jerrysmap.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48649435&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;580 points · 67 comments · by turtleyacht&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since 1963, artist Jerry Gretzinger has been hand-drawing an expansive, evolving map of an imaginary world that now comprises over 3,200 individual panels. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jerrysmap.com/the-map&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.openculture.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;06&amp;amp;#x2F;this-man-has-been-drawing-a-map-of-an-imaginary-land-since-1963.html&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.openculture.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;06&amp;amp;#x2F;this-man-has-been-drawin...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the unique procedural nature of Jerry’s Map, specifically how a custom card deck acts as a system that guides the artist&amp;#39;s long-term creative process &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48652525&quot; title=&quot;The card deck procedure is the most interesting part to me. It makes the map feel less like a drawing and more like a system Jerry is observing over decades. Maybe i need to follow his rules for a map of my own.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48652271&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The entire process is driven by instructions on a card drawn from a special deck created by the artist. I like this. I like that his system pushes the creative process forward without relinquishing the actual creative part of it (making the map tile).&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Many users highlighted a recent documentary by *People Make Games* as a definitive resource on the project &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48649940&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s a good People Make Games video about this from a few days ago https://youtu.be/Is8N7B9b0GQ&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48649926&quot; title=&quot;People Make Games just did a terrific documentary on this https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Is8N7B9b0GQ&amp;amp;pp=0gcJCUECo7VqN5t...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, though others pointed out that the video was already featured prominently in the linked article &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48650414&quot; title=&quot;You know, it&amp;#39;d have been amazing if TFA has not opened with that video. So instead of clicking the link to view TFA, you went off and dug up the exact same link in TFA???&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48650478&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s literally at the top of the post.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggested the map&amp;#39;s rules could inspire an image-generation AI algorithm &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48649737&quot; title=&quot;It would make an interesting map generation algorithm that could feed the card data and specified map tiles into an image gen AI system that would have to take the map tiles and try to follow the rules.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others argued that the value lies in the slow, human effort and mental health benefits of a decades-long physical project &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48650498&quot; title=&quot;As I get older I’ve come to realize more and more how bad instant gratification is. There’s value and mental health benefits in doing things that are slow and take time and effort.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48649948&quot; title=&quot;Can&amp;#39;t feed Jerry to the ai though&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mistral.ai/news/ocr-4/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mistral OCR 4&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mistral.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48645152&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;499 points · 136 comments · by meetpateltech&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mistral has released OCR 4, a compact, self-hostable model that extracts text from documents across 170 languages while providing bounding boxes, block classification, and confidence scores. It outperforms leading competitors in human preference and benchmarks, offering high-speed, cost-effective ingestion for RAG, search, and agentic workflows. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mistral.ai/news/ocr-4/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Mistral OCR 4 : SOTA OCR for Document Intelligence    URL Source: https://mistral.ai/news/ocr-4/    Markdown Content:  Today, we&amp;#39;re releasing Mistral OCR 4, featuring bounding boxes, block classification, and inline confidence scores alongside extracted text. The model supports 170 languages across 10 language groups, runs in a single container for fully self-hosted deployments, and serves as an ingestion component for [enterprise search, RAG, and domain-specific retrieval…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release of Mistral OCR 4 sparked a debate over the current state of document processing, with some users questioning Mistral&amp;#39;s European identity after observing their San Francisco-based promotional content &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48646711&quot; title=&quot;A tangential observation: the video on the linked page wasn&amp;#39;t what I expected.  I thought Mistral was a european AI company, so I didnt expect the video to be filmed in San Francisco featuring three people who don&amp;#39;t seem to be european. I&amp;#39;m not against them being a global organization, that&amp;#39;s wonderful.  I was just surprised.  I expected a parisian office and european accents.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48646514&quot; title=&quot;After paying for Mistral and using it for a while I genuinely hated it. It&amp;#39;s a productivity black hole and can&amp;#39;t realistically compete with anyone. I chose it only because it was European, but no. I&amp;#39;d rather let my one year subscription go to waste than use anything &amp;#39;Mistral&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some commenters expressed frustration with Mistral&amp;#39;s performance compared to competitors, others debated the efficacy of general-purpose models like Claude Opus for OCR tasks, citing conflicting experiences with handwriting recognition and data extraction accuracy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48646343&quot; title=&quot;Recently I tied OCR with Opus 4.8. (I know, not technically right tool for the job). All I needed to do was extract dates from receipts. It got about 20% of the dates wrong yet rated all as “high confidence”. Should have probably tried a more OCR specific model&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48646399&quot; title=&quot;I do not believe this story. Opus 4.8 scanned hundreds of PDFs for me recently with the worst handwriting imaginable.  100% successful, other than one record where even I could not figure out what was written.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48646375&quot; title=&quot;Opus is very good at OCR. Way better than the small 1-4B VLMs. If Opus failed, most likely those smaller models will fail as well.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the discussion highlighted the technological feat of the US Postal Service, noting that while automation is advanced, human workers still manually decipher hundreds of millions of poorly written addresses annually &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48648980&quot; title=&quot;I’ve always thought the US Postal Service is such a technological marvel. They somehow manage to identify and route billions of pieces of mail and I have to imagine their tech is significantly more primitive than this. Not only that but US addresses are absurdly non-standardized, you can often write the same address multiple ways and have it deliver to the same location. I’m sure there’s plenty of published knowledge in this area, but whenever I see announcements about OCR it feels like this…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48649652&quot; title=&quot;The USPS Remote Encoding Center in Salt Lake City examined 841,260,847 images of poorly written addresses in fiscal year 2025. [0] Unfortunately the page does not have a base rate--the total number of mail pieces that were not prepared for automated processing. Total first class mail, which includes a lot of bills prepared for automation was 25.7 billion [1]. If 10% of that are non-automated, then .8 / 2.57 = .31 or a third of mail not prepared for automation is handled by &amp;#39;employees look at…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.dshr.org/2026/06/ais-affordability-crisis.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AI&amp;#39;s Affordability Crisis&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.dshr.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48646276&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;274 points · &lt;strong&gt;358 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by ilreb&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Major AI platforms face an affordability crisis as massive subsidies expire, revealing that token-based pricing can cost companies more than human labor while OpenAI reportedly lost over $38 billion in 2025. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.dshr.org/2026/06/ais-affordability-crisis.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: AI&amp;#39;s Affordability Crisis    URL Source: https://blog.dshr.org/2026/06/ais-affordability-crisis.html    Markdown Content:  A year ago in [_The Back Of The AI Envelope_](https://blog.dshr.org/2025/06/the-back-of-ai-envelope.html) I pointed out that the AI platforms were running the drug-dealer&amp;#39;s algorithm, &amp;#39;the first one&amp;#39;s free&amp;#39;. By massively subsidizing the use of their products, they were generating overwhelming demand for them. They used this demand to justify massive investments, in the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The AI industry is shifting from an &amp;#34;exploration phase&amp;#34; to a strict focus on ROI, with many companies implementing monitoring and token budgets to curb the &amp;#34;over-use&amp;#34; of expensive models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48647030&quot; title=&quot;I think the biggest problem is not necessarily the cost to develop &amp;amp; serve the models, but how quickly user behavior changed with token based pricing. I know a lot of people at companies where the marching orders changed on a dime end of Q1/start of Q2.  These are shops that were fully on the &amp;#39;use AI or die (because we will fire you)&amp;#39; train. Now there&amp;#39;s monitoring, reporting, alerting not just on overall cost but on &amp;#39;over-use&amp;#39; of best/priciest models based on total-or-percent tokens/dollars,…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48648707&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not an affordability crisis, it&amp;#39;s a financial crisis. The models get cheaper super fast. By this time next year Fable 5 will cost less than Sonnet does today. That&amp;#39;s not the problem. The problem is that many companies are going to realize that they don&amp;#39;t get any ROI from AI. Generating code faster != more profit. Most of the Fortune 500 will likely realize this and then the token budgets will come crashing down. Most of their ideas are _bad_ ideas. Implementing bad ideas faster, won&amp;#39;t lead…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that API costs have plummeted by 50x in recent years &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48646706&quot; title=&quot;This is basically bunk because AI costs have gone down by 50x or more (api costs) since 3 years.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that frontier labs remain deeply unprofitable and face increasing pressure from cheaper Chinese and open-source models that are &amp;#34;good enough&amp;#34; for corporate developers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48646890&quot; title=&quot;My take is that Anthropic and OpenAI simply are NOT competing on price. 2 big players are often not enough to create tension on price. Chinese models and open model providers are, indeed, competing on price, and the difference shows.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48647112&quot; title=&quot;I would imagine it only gets worse in the face of good-enough open/chinese/local models too right? Microsoft adding Deepseek support already as I recall? That is - for any definition of &amp;#39;they are behind X months&amp;#39; then eventually they get to the point Claude was in January when the world freaked out, but at 1/10th the cost.  A lot of firms are going to mandate that is good enough for their developers.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48647149&quot; title=&quot;How are Anthropic and OpenAI going to compete on price when they&amp;#39;re both already deeply unprofitable?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant skepticism regarding the long-term value of AI in the enterprise; critics suggest that generating code faster does not inherently increase profit and that a financial crash is imminent as firms realize many AI implementations lack clear utility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48647077&quot; title=&quot;I.e., the demand for programming tokens turns out to be quite elastic.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48648707&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not an affordability crisis, it&amp;#39;s a financial crisis. The models get cheaper super fast. By this time next year Fable 5 will cost less than Sonnet does today. That&amp;#39;s not the problem. The problem is that many companies are going to realize that they don&amp;#39;t get any ROI from AI. Generating code faster != more profit. Most of the Fortune 500 will likely realize this and then the token budgets will come crashing down. Most of their ideas are _bad_ ideas. Implementing bad ideas faster, won&amp;#39;t lead…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. One potential pivot for frontier labs is to move away from general-purpose tokens toward specialized, high-margin domain models (e.g., legal or biomedical&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://words.filippo.io/vuln-reports/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Vulnerability reports are not special anymore&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (words.filippo.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48653216&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;386 points · 220 comments · by goranmoomin&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Filippo Valsorda argues that vulnerability reports are no longer &amp;#34;special&amp;#34; because LLMs have commoditized bug discovery, shifting the maintainer&amp;#39;s burden from finding issues to triaging high-volume noise. Consequently, the traditional expectations of confidentiality and special treatment for researchers are being replaced by a focus on rapid, automated remediation. &lt;a href=&quot;https://words.filippo.io/vuln-reports/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Vulnerability Reports Are Not Special Anymore    URL Source: https://words.filippo.io/vuln-reports/    Published Time: 2026-06-23T13:00:00Z    Markdown Content:  23 Jun 2026  A requirement for staying sane while working in public as an open source maintainer is realizing that every issue, PR, and piece of feedback is a present, not an obligation. You can accept it, ignore it, and use it partially or not at all.    Except…    For years, as lead of the Go Security team at the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The influx of AI-generated, low-quality vulnerability reports has led to &amp;#34;CVE fatigue,&amp;#34; making it difficult for companies to distinguish between critical threats and automated spam &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48653757&quot; title=&quot;I feel like it&amp;#39;s also been overrun by a lot of spam. As someone running a company, I get 2-5 unsolicited &amp;#39;vulnerability reports&amp;#39; per week. Half of them are an LLM finding some bad CSS on our framer splash page. The other half I assume are an extortion attempt so we just mark as spam. Occasionally I see real security researchers on HN complaining that no one takes the disclosure seriously, or that people reply immediately with a cease and desist. But from the receiving end it&amp;#39;s just because the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48653982&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m getting CVE fatigue with all of these super ultra critical 10/10 vulnerabilities that are some node package that compiles my frontend can get stuck if I give it a malicious regex. It&amp;#39;s hard to spot the stuff that actually matters.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48653954&quot; title=&quot;Same experience here. I&amp;#39;ve run a successful vulnerability disclosure program for over a decade and paid out thousands of dollars in bounties for scanii.com (a malware identification API service), but recently (since the beginning of the year), we went from receiving maybe 5 per month to receiving 5 per day. These are clearly AI-generated and extremely low quality (albeit well-written). The rules of the program aren&amp;#39;t read, and it&amp;#39;s clearly a “point-and-click to a website&amp;#39; and file a report.…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that LLMs will eventually eliminate bug classes by improving pre-shipment vetting and language safety, others contend that the current volume of noise—including hundreds of alerts for non-critical dev dependencies—is overwhelming security teams &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48654542&quot; title=&quot;Seriously. We got 116 github dependabot alerts this week. Half of them for dev dependencies.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48654585&quot; title=&quot;I feel like the current situation is temporary. LLMs are finding all the bugs. LLMs are also help fixing most of the bugs. Once most of the bugs are fixed, LLMs should be good at finding bugs before shipping them, the stream of bug reports will die down, and we&amp;#39;ll be back to vulnerabiltiy reports being special. Further, the fact that bugs are so easy to find by LLMs means there is strong incentives to find ways to minimize creating bugs in the first place. That could be new or better languages,…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48653931&quot; title=&quot;Security through obscurity was never a great strategy.. and now it’s not a strategy at all.. Hopefully at the end of this decade, a ton of software practices have been overhauled to eliminate classes of problems. Memory-safe language use is a great start - but it’d be great to see innovation in checking for TOCTOU problems, improper/missing authn &amp;amp; authz, and many others. This is an engineering problem. It won’t be solved by models that “only do dumb shit 1/10th as often, only 0.01% of the time…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. To manage this, some organizations are implementing stricter disclosure rules, such as requiring video proof of exploits or considering refundable deposits to deter spammers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48653954&quot; title=&quot;Same experience here. I&amp;#39;ve run a successful vulnerability disclosure program for over a decade and paid out thousands of dollars in bounties for scanii.com (a malware identification API service), but recently (since the beginning of the year), we went from receiving maybe 5 per month to receiving 5 per day. These are clearly AI-generated and extremely low quality (albeit well-written). The rules of the program aren&amp;#39;t read, and it&amp;#39;s clearly a “point-and-click to a website&amp;#39; and file a report.…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48654880&quot; title=&quot;Have you considered requiring a small payment for vulnerability disclosure? Refund it on payout. This should be very effective at deterring spammers. It also sucks for real reports, but beats shutting down the program entirely.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/baidu/Unlimited-OCR&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Unlimited OCR: One-shot long-horizon parsing&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48643426&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;494 points · 110 comments · by ingve&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Baidu has released &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/baidu/Unlimited-OCR&quot; title=&quot;GitHub - baidu/Unlimited-OCR: Unlimited OCR Works: Welcome the Era of One-shot Long-horizon Parsing.    Unlimited OCR Works: Welcome the Era of One-shot Long-horizon Parsing. - baidu/Unlimited-OCR    [Skip to content](#start-of-content)    ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [Sign in](/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fbaidu%2FUnlimited-OCR)    Appearance settings    * Platform      + AI CODE CREATION      - [GitHub CopilotWrite better code with AI](https://github.com/features/copilot)      -…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on a new architectural approach to OCR that uses Reference Sliding Window Attention (R-SWA) to process long documents without the memory constraints typical of vision models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48643871&quot; title=&quot;Very interesting. The way I understand this works is that the researchers found a clever architectural hack to stop AI from hoarding memory when reading long documents. Normally, when an AI transcribes a 100 page PDF, it tries to remember every single word it has already ingested. This short-term memory (the KV cache) grows linearly O(N) until the model runs out of VRAM and crashes (or caps it) To avoid this, developers are forced to build janky code that chops PDFs into individual pages,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that OCR is a &amp;#34;solved&amp;#34; problem &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48643798&quot; title=&quot;OCR has been solved long time ago with vision models. Solutions are consistent, reliable, and stable. What is the point of reinventing the wheel? I would definitely understand post processing, like extracting data, answering question .. etc, but why re-doing the OCR engine itself?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that current LLM-based solutions often require &amp;#34;janky&amp;#34; manual image slicing to avoid hallucinations or memory crashes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48643871&quot; title=&quot;Very interesting. The way I understand this works is that the researchers found a clever architectural hack to stop AI from hoarding memory when reading long documents. Normally, when an AI transcribes a 100 page PDF, it tries to remember every single word it has already ingested. This short-term memory (the KV cache) grows linearly O(N) until the model runs out of VRAM and crashes (or caps it) To avoid this, developers are forced to build janky code that chops PDFs into individual pages,…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48644370&quot; title=&quot;my attempts at using AI to do OCR have always resulted in invented artifacts, which is not production feasible. does this suffer from that as well? A simple example is words that are supposed to be in other languages being automatically translated to English, which ruins the effect&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48647104&quot; title=&quot;I do OCR of images, and that&amp;#39;s exactly what I do. I take one big image and slice it into many smaller ones, and send those to the LLM. Perfect every time, unlike using the whole image which resulted in hot garbage.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also a notable call for these advancements to be applied to Optical Music Recognition (OMR), which remains &amp;#34;abysmal&amp;#34; due to the complexity of music notation and a lack of high-quality training corpora &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48644574&quot; title=&quot;I recently bought a tablet for sheet music, mostly to replace a stack of jazz &amp;#39;Real Books&amp;#39; at jam sessions. And the phone camera scans I made are okay, but fixed in size and have a lot of artifacts. And it would be great to transpose on the fly for e.g. Bb or Eb instruments, but being a scan this is obviously not possible. I got digging into the state of optical music recognition and came away concluding that music is basically a greenfield for AI wherever you look. Optical music recognition is…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.16140&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;VibeThinker: 3B param model that beats Opus 4.5 on reasoning with novel SFT+GRPO&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (arxiv.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48639240&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;397 points · 205 comments · by timhigins&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VibeThinker-3B is a compact 3-billion parameter model that achieves frontier-level reasoning performance, matching or exceeding much larger models like DeepSeek V3.2 and Gemini 3 Pro through optimized supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.16140&quot; title=&quot;Title: VibeThinker-3B: Exploring the Frontier of Verifiable Reasoning in Small Language Models    URL Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.16140    Published Time: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 01:16:57 GMT    Markdown Content:  [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.16140)[HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2606.16140v1)    &amp;gt; Abstract:This technical report introduces VibeThinker-3B, a compact dense model with 3B parameters developed to investigate how far verifiable reasoning can be pushed within a strictly…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the potential for small, specialized models to outperform massive frontier models by prioritizing reasoning capabilities over broad factual knowledge &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48640319&quot; title=&quot;Am I right in thinking this is a tiny model which has been trained well to reason, and that&amp;#39;s it? Makes me think of a smart person who doesn&amp;#39;t know anything about a given topic, but with the right tools will go and research the heck out of it. I really like the sound of this... why have models train on learning anything when you can just train them how to learn and let them get on with it from something as small as a Pi Zero and an internet connection.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48643256&quot; title=&quot;Looks like we are seeing small but mighty model breakthroughs, outpacing the pure capital firepower of SOTA providers. I love rooting for the little guy, but is it too soon to call it? To play devils advocate, could it just be the benchmarks are not efficient enough to capture success of real developer workflows?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48640495&quot; title=&quot;This has been my dream ever since. Instead of encoding &amp;#39;all the knowledge&amp;#39; into those parameters, how about just making a model that has the same size, but all (or rather most) it does is reasoning? Just give it the ability to browse the net (e.g. language specifications, documentation and best practices) and just have it do its thing. Why does my coding agent need to know the population of New York, know a cheese cake recipe or the general lifespan of an ostrich? Just give it the bare minimum…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users envision a &amp;#34;reasoning engine&amp;#34; that uses external tools to fetch data as needed &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48640319&quot; title=&quot;Am I right in thinking this is a tiny model which has been trained well to reason, and that&amp;#39;s it? Makes me think of a smart person who doesn&amp;#39;t know anything about a given topic, but with the right tools will go and research the heck out of it. I really like the sound of this... why have models train on learning anything when you can just train them how to learn and let them get on with it from something as small as a Pi Zero and an internet connection.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48640495&quot; title=&quot;This has been my dream ever since. Instead of encoding &amp;#39;all the knowledge&amp;#39; into those parameters, how about just making a model that has the same size, but all (or rather most) it does is reasoning? Just give it the ability to browse the net (e.g. language specifications, documentation and best practices) and just have it do its thing. Why does my coding agent need to know the population of New York, know a cheese cake recipe or the general lifespan of an ostrich? Just give it the bare minimum…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48642282&quot; title=&quot;I think this is a well known concept, which we can&amp;#39;t deliver yet. LLM/transformer give us reasoning engine as a byproduct of its design, but it is quite ineffective. If we can distill reasoning, if reasoning can be achieved without general knowledge, it will be a very effective machine. Some amount of knowledge is required for reasoning. Maybe such model can dynamically knowledge domains to have taxonomy. For example, model can&amp;#39;t effective reason about development task, if it has no knowledge…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue that a high baseline of general knowledge is still necessary to provide the context required for effective judgment &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48640144&quot; title=&quot;There is some base level of intelligence any model needs to be useful, even in narrow tasks. Could you teach a 5 year old to drive a car? A 10 year old?  A 12 year old?    To drive a car requires being able to read, to have judgement about ice or rainy conditions, to anticipate a child running after a ball.  By the time a human in in their mid teens they have acquired the base knowledge... Small models need to have enough base knowledge to be able to be good enough -- even in a seemingly narrow…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48642282&quot; title=&quot;I think this is a well known concept, which we can&amp;#39;t deliver yet. LLM/transformer give us reasoning engine as a byproduct of its design, but it is quite ineffective. If we can distill reasoning, if reasoning can be achieved without general knowledge, it will be a very effective machine. Some amount of knowledge is required for reasoning. Maybe such model can dynamically knowledge domains to have taxonomy. For example, model can&amp;#39;t effective reason about development task, if it has no knowledge…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite excitement over these &amp;#34;small but mighty&amp;#34; breakthroughs, skepticism remains regarding whether current benchmarks accurately reflect real-world performance, especially after reports of the model failing simple creative tasks like SVG generation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48643256&quot; title=&quot;Looks like we are seeing small but mighty model breakthroughs, outpacing the pure capital firepower of SOTA providers. I love rooting for the little guy, but is it too soon to call it? To play devils advocate, could it just be the benchmarks are not efficient enough to capture success of real developer workflows?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48639746&quot; title=&quot;I tried generating the classic pelican svg, but it failed horribly just showing me a rectangle and  a black circle...&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/run-isolated-sandboxes-with-full-lifecycle-control-aws-lambda-introduces-microvms/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;MicroVMs: Run isolated sandboxes with full lifecycle control&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (aws.amazon.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48642510&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;383 points · 206 comments · by justincormack&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AWS Lambda has introduced MicroVMs, a new serverless compute primitive powered by Firecracker that provides isolated, stateful execution environments for running untrusted user or AI-generated code with near-instant launch and resume capabilities. &lt;a href=&quot;https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/run-isolated-sandboxes-with-full-lifecycle-control-aws-lambda-introduces-microvms/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Run isolated sandboxes with full lifecycle control: AWS Lambda introduces MicroVMs | Amazon Web Services    URL Source: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/run-isolated-sandboxes-with-full-lifecycle-control-aws-lambda-introduces-microvms/    Published Time: 2026-06-22T15:40:07-07:00    Markdown Content:  ## [AWS News Blog](https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/)    [![Image 1: Voiced by Polly](https://a0.awsstatic.com/aws-blog/images/Voiced_by_Amazon_Polly_EN.png)](https://aws.amazon.com/polly/)    Today,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a tension between the technical advantages of MicroVMs for AI agents and the financial risks of usage-based pricing models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48688814&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s the best provider to self-host Firecracker? I feel that AWS is not a safe or cost-effective option for a self-funded startup or small business. Although is anything cost effective anymore? Hetzner just had a massive price hike. Part of it might just be that I am old and inflation is catching up with my understanding of prices. But as far as AWS I still have to say no thanks. Imagine some group actually started using my hosted AI agent service for something compute and network intensive.…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689361&quot; title=&quot;Def! My personal belief is that the future of an &amp;#39;app&amp;#39; is a combo: 1. micro VM      2. agent on the VM      3. software bundled into the VM So, it should be stupid simple to run these local sandboxed apps/agents. Right now, not too hard for technical users (esp. with things like https://smolmachines.com/ and https://microsandbox.dev/ ), but not as easy as clicking an app icon or typing `/path/to/binary` in the CLI&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that managed services like Fargate or Fly.io offer necessary isolation, others criticize the lack of spending caps, fearing &amp;#34;gotcha&amp;#34; bills from unexpected resource spikes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689259&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Containers launch in seconds, yet their shared-kernel architecture requires significant custom hardening to safely contain untrusted code That&amp;#39;s literally why they made Fargate. It&amp;#39;s managed firecracker VMs with containers. They invented firecracker for this purpose. This new product is competing with Fargate, but they don&amp;#39;t mention Fargate at all in the announcement. &amp;gt; you create a MicroVM Image by supplying a Dockerfile and code packaged as a zip artifact in Amazon S3    &amp;gt;     &amp;gt; MicroVMs…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48690592&quot; title=&quot;I specifically complained to a fly.io staff on here about their &amp;#39;gotcha, b*tch&amp;#39; usage based pricing which they basically copied from AWS, and they stood by it and other people here backed them up. No one is giving me a pile of free money, so I can&amp;#39;t risk that kind of thing.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693705&quot; title=&quot;The short version is it seems like a big &amp;#39;gotcha&amp;#39; that there is no way to limit bandwidth or spending on that or other resources ahead of time, and that might be a deliberate business model that is more aimed at well-funded startups or large companies that are monitoring costs much less closely than an individual or small business. It&amp;#39;s not necessarily too hard to just not dynamically spawn a bunch of machines, but the bandwidth one is going to sneak up on people.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents of these platforms contend that hard limits are impractical for hosting fixed-function applications and that self-hosting on independent hardware remains a viable, cost-effective alternative for those wary of cloud providers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689105&quot; title=&quot;Setting up your own is not that hard and if you bought some compute before the Altman squeeze, very cheap.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48691996&quot; title=&quot;Exactly what did we copy from AWS here? You could get a long way in our decisionmaking process generally by just consciously avoiding what AWS does.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48693876&quot; title=&quot;Lots of people want limits. They might make sense for something like Sprites, where the end-users are often (but not always) individual developers. They&amp;#39;re terrible for hosting fixed-function applications. The real gotcha is having limits, because that&amp;#39;s the host effectively taking your app down for you. I know talk is cheap, but I&amp;#39;ve been in the room for every one of these discussions over the last 6 years at Fly.io, and if we could have come up with a system to make limits workable, we would…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.interconnects.ai/p/glm-52-is-the-step-change-for-open&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GLM-5.2 is a step change for open agents&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (interconnects.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48639840&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;365 points · 223 comments · by vantareed&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Z.ai has released GLM-5.2, a high-performance open-weight model that rivals top proprietary systems like Claude and Gemini in coding and agentic tasks. The release marks a significant milestone for open-source AI, narrowing the capabilities gap between closed U.S. labs and Chinese open-weight models to roughly seven months. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.interconnects.ai/p/glm-52-is-the-step-change-for-open&quot; title=&quot;Title: GLM-5.2 is the step change for open agents    URL Source: https://www.interconnects.ai/p/glm-52-is-the-step-change-for-open    Published Time: 2026-06-22T14:52:45+00:00    Markdown Content:  ##### Housekeeping: Following my “[State of the blog](https://www.interconnects.ai/p/state-of-the-blog-mid-2026)” post last week, noting a slight increase in paid features, it’s a good time to remind folks that I offer [group subscriptions](https://www.interconnects.ai/about#%C2%A7group-paid-subscriptions)…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The emergence of high-quality Chinese open-weight models like GLM and DeepSeek is seen as a vital counter to the high costs of Western AI, which some users argue creates a &amp;#34;gap between haves and have-nots&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48643569&quot; title=&quot;Open weight models from Chinese labs tend to be significantly cheaper. I think theyre absolutely needed. I can&amp;#39;t afford 200 USD a month for personal use of coding AI, and I don&amp;#39;t think such prices are reasonable for most of the world economy anyway. Not to mention US firms might be giving their employees a lot more than that. It&amp;#39;s increasingly feeling, to me, that  theres a gap building up between haves and have nots. But then, we get news of these open weight models that are reasonably priced…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667279&quot; title=&quot;You made me realize something. I routinely spend upwards of 500$ per month on LLMs for coding (expensed towards clients). However I live in a place where 500$ is around the avg. salary. I’m lucky that I know my way around western clients. Clients who pay these expenses and are happy to work with me because I am still about 50% cheaper than local talent in EU/US, while my salary at home converts to an upper class income at the highest tax bracket. Which of course causes some unfairness on both…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some professionals justify spending hundreds of dollars monthly by billing clients or citing high ROI, others find such prices unreasonable for personal use and rely on these cheaper alternatives for &amp;#34;80/20 rule&amp;#34; use cases &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48643569&quot; title=&quot;Open weight models from Chinese labs tend to be significantly cheaper. I think theyre absolutely needed. I can&amp;#39;t afford 200 USD a month for personal use of coding AI, and I don&amp;#39;t think such prices are reasonable for most of the world economy anyway. Not to mention US firms might be giving their employees a lot more than that. It&amp;#39;s increasingly feeling, to me, that  theres a gap building up between haves and have nots. But then, we get news of these open weight models that are reasonably priced…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48647917&quot; title=&quot;200 is much less than the value you’re supposed to get out of it. If it’s not then yeah go ahead and use cheaper models with worst quality&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667279&quot; title=&quot;You made me realize something. I routinely spend upwards of 500$ per month on LLMs for coding (expensed towards clients). However I live in a place where 500$ is around the avg. salary. I’m lucky that I know my way around western clients. Clients who pay these expenses and are happy to work with me because I am still about 50% cheaper than local talent in EU/US, while my salary at home converts to an upper class income at the highest tax bracket. Which of course causes some unfairness on both…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48667077&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been working with Deepseek V4 Flash (with opencode as the harness). It&amp;#39;s been almost indistinguishable from Codex / Claude Code for me. I&amp;#39;m sure I&amp;#39;ll run into problems when I get to a stickier ticket to tackle. But so far, it&amp;#39;s been quite good, and I find it writes straightforward code. I do think the Chinese models are good enough for an 80/20 rule use case.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite their affordability, some users report that these models can still struggle with &amp;#34;goofy loops&amp;#34; and hallucinations during complex reasoning tasks compared to top-tier proprietary models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48665940&quot; title=&quot;I just tested GLM 5.2 out via Z.ai in pi for a little one-off project that was already scoped. It actually did a relatively decent job starting out, and figured important things out from context. But the reasoning traces became increasingly hilarious, with it getting confused and going in loops, doubting itself. I began to feel almost sad, it was like listening to the internal monologue of someone with anxiety disorder. It made pretty good progress but wound up going in a lot of goofy loops and…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668160&quot; title=&quot;Thanks so much for being bold enough to be fairly open about the costs, how you arrange billing and the advantages that&amp;#39;s given you. I&amp;#39;ve been fooling around with DeepSeek 4 agentically. It&amp;#39;s probably not as good as Anthropic offerings, but even those seem to be roiled in politics and strife and DeepSeek 4 is very good IMHO. I&amp;#39;ll later try out GLM. I&amp;#39;m in Australia. The government has set up a &amp;#39;return and earn&amp;#39; scheme to keep aluminium cans, plastic bottles and paper drink cartons out of the…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://swelljoe.com/post/will-it-mythos/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Will It Mythos?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (swelljoe.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48640196&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;309 points · 220 comments · by mindingnever&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A security researcher developed a benchmark suite to test whether public AI models can match the exploit-finding capabilities of Anthropic’s restricted &amp;#34;Mythos&amp;#34; model, finding that while top-tier models like Opus and GPT 5.5 show promise, Mythos remains uniquely powerful at identifying complex, multi-file vulnerabilities. &lt;a href=&quot;https://swelljoe.com/post/will-it-mythos/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Will It Mythos?    URL Source: https://swelljoe.com/post/will-it-mythos/    Published Time: 2026-05-30T19:28:47-05:00    Markdown Content:  May 30, 2026    OK, so Mythos finds really challenging security bugs, right? That’s why it’s cordoned off from the hoi polloi, to protect the world from such a powerful finder of exploits.    I am skeptical of the reasons given publicly, I suspect it’s really just so much more expensive to operate than their current models that they don’t want to offer it…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users report that the Fable/Mythos model demonstrates a significant leap in capability, exhibiting a &amp;#34;colleague-like&amp;#34; nuance and persistence that surpasses previous versions like Opus &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48640500&quot; title=&quot;In my brief experience, the difference between fable and opus is largely in persistence, not global intelligence like you might expect. Fable just... goes the extra mile, sometimes in a scary way.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48640550&quot; title=&quot;Hard disagree. Opus reports to me like a student. Fable reported to me like a colleague (researcher). It genuinely seemed to pick up on nuance that the other models just don&amp;#39;t, even when I tell them explicitly. It&amp;#39;s been really frustrating that neither Codex nor Opus can make targetted edits to Fable&amp;#39;s code without screwing something subtle up. For context, this is for computational geometry work, so your mileage may vary.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48641159&quot; title=&quot;Around February, Opus 4.6 was excellent. Smart, fast, proactive. Then it got lobotomized and it&amp;#39;s never been the same after that nerf. 4.7 came along and it too was disappointing—not unlike 4.8, which despite feeling a smidge smarter, tends to write word salad and is basically unusable for some workflows. Fable felt like having access to that &amp;#39;old Opus&amp;#39; again, but a little smarter. Sort of like I&amp;#39;d expect an Opus 5 to be. It&amp;#39;s not earth shattering, but it was a step in the right direction. And…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some find it substantially more powerful for complex implementations and coding &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48640849&quot; title=&quot;As I posted in another comment, I found Fable to be substantially more powerful than any previous model. However, this isn&amp;#39;t just an ungrounded opinion - I uploaded my full session transcript and code created working on a very complex implementation, so people can judge for themselves, if they&amp;#39;re interested: https://tossrock.substack.com/p/36-hours-with-fable&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48640550&quot; title=&quot;Hard disagree. Opus reports to me like a student. Fable reported to me like a colleague (researcher). It genuinely seemed to pick up on nuance that the other models just don&amp;#39;t, even when I tell them explicitly. It&amp;#39;s been really frustrating that neither Codex nor Opus can make targetted edits to Fable&amp;#39;s code without screwing something subtle up. For context, this is for computational geometry work, so your mileage may vary.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue its perceived superiority may stem from &amp;#34;social engineering&amp;#34; through more confident prose or the removal of safety-related &amp;#34;lobotomization&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48641159&quot; title=&quot;Around February, Opus 4.6 was excellent. Smart, fast, proactive. Then it got lobotomized and it&amp;#39;s never been the same after that nerf. 4.7 came along and it too was disappointing—not unlike 4.8, which despite feeling a smidge smarter, tends to write word salad and is basically unusable for some workflows. Fable felt like having access to that &amp;#39;old Opus&amp;#39; again, but a little smarter. Sort of like I&amp;#39;d expect an Opus 5 to be. It&amp;#39;s not earth shattering, but it was a step in the right direction. And…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48640846&quot; title=&quot;From all the things I read I&amp;#39;m pretty convinced that Mythos is just standard LLM with safety features turned off. If current models weren&amp;#39;t reluctant to search for vulnerabilities, they might perform as good as Mythos.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48640571&quot; title=&quot;Wait, so.. This is interesting. The &amp;#39;reported to me like a colleague&amp;#39; part. Is it just that anthropic gave Mythos even more of that Anthropic™ character, (incorrectly) radiating confidence? Is that why people have been losing their minds over that thing? Is this just cheap social engineering? I mean I bet it is also slightly more capable than opus, but that would all check out to me.  Man. Thanks for sharing I suppose.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Skeptics note that in head-to-head technical benchmarks, the model can still miss edge cases and struggle with open research problems similarly to its predecessors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48641362&quot; title=&quot;Interesting. I tried Fable vs Codex 5.5 xhigh on three different cases. 1. A resource leak with unknown cause. Both of them zoomed onto the same potential issue and proposed almost identical patches. Fable missed an edge case that Codex handled correctly. 2. Review of a SPICE model. Models had different comments, none substantial. Both missed important issues that were simulated inadequately. Clearly a valley where they are undertrained. 3. An open research problem in CS, presented as a…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48641329&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand the article. &amp;#39;I’d say this benchmark answers with a resounding, “Maybe.” Mythos maybe really is better than the other current models at finding security bugs&amp;#39; Yet in the results, I don&amp;#39;t see Mythos? It seems like a really well researched article with lots of results for other models, yet the title seems to be clickbait because the results don&amp;#39;t contain Mythos, do they?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tikz.dev/editor/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Show HN: TikZ Editor – WYSIWYG editor for figures in LaTeX&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (tikz.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48645437&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;450 points · 74 comments · by DominikPeters&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TikZ Editor is a new open-source, WYSIWYG tool that allows users to create LaTeX figures by visually dragging and resizing elements while keeping the underlying source code in sync. &lt;a href=&quot;https://tikz.dev/editor/&quot; title=&quot;Hi all! TikZ is a widely-used LaTeX package for drawing figures in papers. It uses commands like \draw[-&amp;amp;gt;] (0,0) -- (1,2); to draw lines, shapes, text, etc. Academics usually code up their figures by hand, so there is lots of twiddling around with the coordinates and recompiling until things look nice. I guess it’s a bit like SVG, but it’s more code than markup, for example it has loops with \foreach.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;I built an open-source WYSIWYG TikZ editor (available for web and desktop) that allows…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users generally praise the tool&amp;#39;s potential to simplify the notoriously difficult process of creating TikZ diagrams, though some suggest expanding support to Typst&amp;#39;s Cetz &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48649794&quot; title=&quot;This is cool! I know people like it, but I hate writing TikZ manually, to the point that I&amp;#39;ve mostly moved most of my technical-ish drawings to draw.io/diagrams.net, and then just export to a PNG. I feel like it&amp;#39;s inelegant, but it works well enough and it&amp;#39;s easy to make something that looks ok. Generally I&amp;#39;m all for text-defined stuff. I have moved some of my stuff to Mermaid when I know my stuff is going to live in Markdown but I&amp;#39;ve not tried to get that working in TeX. That said, I would…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48649004&quot; title=&quot;Oh man, good on you identifying a product that needs to exist. I&amp;#39;ve used a few TikZ editors (both online and desktop) and none of them are just amazing. But, I&amp;#39;ve taken my papers to Typst. Could you have the agent do the same thing for Cetz, the TikZ equivalent for Typst?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. A primary technical critique is the editor&amp;#39;s reliance on absolute coordinates rather than TikZ’s native relative positioning and alignment features, which makes the generated code less idiomatic and harder to edit manually &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48649028&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve tried it now a little. The UI looks very cool, and generally the project is cool so congrats! However, the generated TikZ code is not good in my opinion. Everything uses absolute coordinates, which in TikZ is seldom needed. Just to start, if I place a single node I get absolute coordinates for it. Why?  If you just write `\node {Hello};`, TikZ will put that at the center of the bounding box. No need to tell it&amp;#39;s at `(0.5,2.91)` like it&amp;#39;s happening in my test. Then features such as &amp;#39;align…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48647683&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s cool. I guess it doesn&amp;#39;t support TikZ&amp;#39; relative positioning (left of etc) because WYSIWYG features like drag-and-drop require absolute positioning?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Suggested improvements include adding &amp;#34;sticky&amp;#34; arrows that move with boxes, better UI for circular node distribution, and potential integration as a plugin for apps like Obsidian &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48649794&quot; title=&quot;This is cool! I know people like it, but I hate writing TikZ manually, to the point that I&amp;#39;ve mostly moved most of my technical-ish drawings to draw.io/diagrams.net, and then just export to a PNG. I feel like it&amp;#39;s inelegant, but it works well enough and it&amp;#39;s easy to make something that looks ok. Generally I&amp;#39;m all for text-defined stuff. I have moved some of my stuff to Mermaid when I know my stuff is going to live in Markdown but I&amp;#39;ve not tried to get that working in TeX. That said, I would…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48646585&quot; title=&quot;Here&amp;#39;s what I would need: the ability to position five nodes in a circular fashion, so that they are evenly spaced.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48648501&quot; title=&quot;Are you open to people repurposing this app as a plugin to larger apps like obsidian?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-06-22</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-06-22</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://store.steampowered.com/news/group/45479024/view/685257114654870245&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Steam Machine launches today&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (store.steampowered.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48632884&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1918 points&lt;/strong&gt; · &lt;strong&gt;1734 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by theschwa&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Valve has officially launched the Steam Machine, accompanied by a dedicated Steam store sale and a technical deep dive into the &amp;#34;Newell Nucleus&amp;#34; hardware. &lt;a href=&quot;https://store.steampowered.com/news/group/45479024/view/685257114654870245&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;store.steampowered.com&amp;amp;#x2F;sale&amp;amp;#x2F;steammachine&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;store.steampowered.com&amp;amp;#x2F;sale&amp;amp;#x2F;steammachine&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.lttlabs.com&amp;amp;#x2F;articles&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;06&amp;amp;#x2F;22&amp;amp;#x2F;the-newell-nucleus-steam-machine-ltt-companion-article&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.lttlabs.com&amp;amp;#x2F;articles&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;06&amp;amp;#x2F;22&amp;amp;#x2F;the-newell-nucle...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Valve’s randomized reservation system and requirement for verified accounts are praised as effective strategies to prioritize legitimate gamers over scalpers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48633271&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Why a randomized reservation order?  [...] we wanted to create a system that would be less frustrating and more fair for everyone. A launch that starts at a specific day and time tends to reward bots, people with fast internet connections, talented gaming fingers for quick F5/refresh reactions, and those who can schedule their life around that moment. By accepting reservation signups over the course of a few days, without any incentive to be first, we&amp;#39;re hoping to take away some of that…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48633854&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, this is a promising solution to scalping. Previously, if you had only small numbers of consoles available at launch, scalpers and their bots would claim a large share of them. With Valve&amp;#39;s new policy, that share is reduced to s/g , where s is the number of verified Steam accounts controlled by scalpers and g is the number of legit gamer accounts. Since s is likely to be much less than g , s/g is close to zero, and scalping is dramatically curtailed. Almost all of the initial batch of…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, though one commenter argues that scalping efficiently allocates goods to those with the highest willingness to pay &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48633961&quot; title=&quot;Scalping is a good thing, because it gets consoles in the hands of those who want them the most, as evidenced by willingness to pay.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the &amp;#34;open&amp;#34; nature of the hardware allowing for alternative operating systems &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48633563&quot; title=&quot;I am pleased to see hardware not being locked down as a selling point: &amp;gt; Yes, Steam Machine is optimized for gaming, but it&amp;#39;s still your PC. Install your own apps, or even another operating system. Who are we to tell you how to use your computer? It feels very commonsense that you should be able to run whatever you want on the computer that you have purchased, but it is surprisingly uncommon.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, there is a strong consensus that the $1,049 price point is a poor value compared to the PS5 Pro and modern PC components &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48633402&quot; title=&quot;I know the price for PC parts is terrible these days, but $1049 for a 6-core 16GB RAM, with a 512GB SSD, and no controller, is a terrible value. For reference, the PS5 Pro has more than twice the number GPU CUs, an 8-core CPU, a 2TB SSD, a controller, and costs $899.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48634381&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s just dead-on-arrival. I&amp;#39;m not convinced this hardware is &amp;#39;an extension of PC gaming, not a console&amp;#39; when  the hardware is generations out of date. To credit Microsoft, Sony, and other players, the reality is that unless you are &amp;#39;in the game&amp;#39; for decades, you HAVE to provide a convincing differentiator from the other console markets. Steam had this with the Steam Deck and personally, I see the world moving to thin clients that play games via some remote desktop infrastructure. It makes no…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48633252&quot; title=&quot;For reference, a PlayStation 5 is $600-650 for the base models (lower performance than Steam Machine) and $900 for the Pro model (likely higher performance). I know this is a PC and thus an open platform, but for most buyers in living room gaming, that&amp;#39;s the competition. I don&amp;#39;t think this will reach mass market success, but I&amp;#39;m not sure that was the goal. Who are they selling to? Note: I ask as someone with a Steamdeck sitting on the desk in front of me and a custom-built computer under my TV…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue the device is &amp;#34;dead on arrival&amp;#34; due to outdated specs and the lack of a kernel-level anti-cheat for competitive multiplayer, suggesting that a docked Steam Deck or a custom PC remains a more compelling option &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48634381&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s just dead-on-arrival. I&amp;#39;m not convinced this hardware is &amp;#39;an extension of PC gaming, not a console&amp;#39; when  the hardware is generations out of date. To credit Microsoft, Sony, and other players, the reality is that unless you are &amp;#39;in the game&amp;#39; for decades, you HAVE to provide a convincing differentiator from the other console markets. Steam had this with the Steam Deck and personally, I see the world moving to thin clients that play games via some remote desktop infrastructure. It makes no…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48633252&quot; title=&quot;For reference, a PlayStation 5 is $600-650 for the base models (lower performance than Steam Machine) and $900 for the Pro model (likely higher performance). I know this is a PC and thus an open platform, but for most buyers in living room gaming, that&amp;#39;s the competition. I don&amp;#39;t think this will reach mass market success, but I&amp;#39;m not sure that was the goal. Who are they selling to? Note: I ask as someone with a Steamdeck sitting on the desk in front of me and a custom-built computer under my TV…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://docs.deno.com/runtime/desktop/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Deno Desktop&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (docs.deno.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48626137&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1119 points&lt;/strong&gt; · 398 comments · by GeneralMaximus&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Deno 2.9 will introduce `deno desktop`, a new tool that converts Deno projects and web frameworks into self-contained, cross-platform desktop applications featuring small binaries, native OS integration, and built-in auto-updates. &lt;a href=&quot;https://docs.deno.com/runtime/desktop/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Desktop apps    URL Source: https://docs.deno.com/runtime/desktop/    Published Time: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 13:07:57 GMT    Markdown Content:  `deno desktop` turns a Deno project (anything from a single TypeScript file to a Next.js app) into a self-contained desktop application. The output is a redistributable binary that bundles your code, the Deno runtime, and a web rendering engine into one bundle per platform.    Coming in Deno 2.9    `deno desktop` ships in Deno v2.9.0 and is not in a stable…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The introduction of Deno Desktop has reignited the debate over web-based versus native UI, with critics arguing that web technologies fail to adopt host OS patterns and prioritize developer convenience over user experience &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48626430&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Web technology is the most widely-known UI toolkit in the world. Poor choice of words there IMHO. The reason Electron apps get a lot of flak is because they are everything _but_ a UI toolkit. They consistently miss the mark in adopting UI patterns from their host OS. Web tech is just web tech. Yes it will allow you to render a button, but even unstyled, the button won&amp;#39;t necessarily look native to the OS, and will vary between browsers.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48626524&quot; title=&quot;Consistency is a large factor in any good design, UI design more so.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48626570&quot; title=&quot;Yeah, it is mostly laziness and cost cutting at the expense of users. Nowadays there isn&amp;#39;t even an excuse anymore, just vibe code it away in native frameworks.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users defend web tech as the only truly universal UI toolkit &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48626480&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; look native to the OS Is that a problem? A button with a legible label is a button. The host OS doesn&amp;#39;t have to look exactly like the applications it runs.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48626909&quot; title=&quot;Which native framework? Even in a &amp;#39;post-vibe code&amp;#39; era I wouldn&amp;#39;t want to create multiple versions of the same app, and none of the &amp;#39;platform-native&amp;#39; GUI toolkits run on everything. SwiftUI is apple-only, gtk has pretty bad compatibility on non-linux, qt is decent but requires C++ or python, and even so still not much for mobile. Don&amp;#39;t even get started on &amp;#39;Windows frameworks&amp;#39;, because as I write this sentence they may have left a new one in the ditch. Flutter may be the closest, but why didn&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others note that Deno’s plan for a shared Chromium Embedded Framework (CEF) runtime could solve the massive bundle sizes typical of Electron &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48626999&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Shared CEF runtime across apps. Every app currently bundles its own CEF copy. A managed shared runtime would drop binary sizes to a few MB per app. On the roadmap. This[0] sounds interesting. I am not familiar with CEF, so I wonder how the versioning works. When different apps require different versions of CEF, do we just essentially end up with the electron model where every app bundles their own browser (just slightly less bad). Or is there still an advantage to a &amp;#39;shared runtime&amp;#39; in that…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48627307&quot; title=&quot;In case anybody else wondered CEF is the Chromium embedded framework. https://github.com/chromiumembedded/cef&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. This approach may challenge competitors like Tauri, as bundling a consistent rendering engine is often preferred over the &amp;#34;hellish&amp;#34; cross-platform inconsistencies of targeting system webviews &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48626625&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m happy for competition in this space, specially because Deno can run true TypeScript directly and not just strip types like the current Node implementation. With that said, this is going to eat a lot of Tauri market. Why would I use Tauri now? The 150mb of additional bundle size is just an extra 1 to 10 seconds of download time in most internet connections and you get a reliable rendering engine.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630291&quot; title=&quot;The biggest weakness of a framework like Tauri is the choice to target system webviews instead of bundling a browser runtime. It seems great to be able to cut hundreds of megabytes out of your app installer, but the platform differences wind up being a complete and ongoing pain in the ass. Tauri support on Windows is phenomenal. Tauri on Mac runs into lots of WebKit/Safari issues, especially on older Mac machines that have an older engine that doesn&amp;#39;t support modern web APIs. Your app can crash…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nevergivethemyourface.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Never Give Them Your Face&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (nevergivethemyourface.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630066&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;748 points · 451 comments · by audiodude&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Advocacy group &amp;#34;Never Give Them Your Face&amp;#34; warns that mandatory age verification laws are evolving into a dangerous global identity tracking system that compromises biometric privacy, creates massive data breach risks, and fails to protect children while enabling state surveillance. &lt;a href=&quot;https://nevergivethemyourface.com/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Never Give Them Your Face    URL Source: https://nevergivethemyourface.com/    Markdown Content:  They want your face. It will be called safety. Verification. _[Age assurance](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/12/10-not-so-hidden-dangers-age-verification)._ A small step to protect children. But strip the language away and the demand is plain: before you may speak, post, or read, you must first prove who you are. And the only way they&amp;#39;ve figured out how to do it is with your government ID, or…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The sudden global push for age verification is viewed by some as a coordinated lobbying effort by Meta to address long-standing internet issues with &amp;#34;band-aid&amp;#34; solutions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630776&quot; title=&quot;This is a little bit of a tangent compared to the post, but can someone explain to me why it&amp;#39;s NOW that we have multiple countries (USA, Canada, UK, Australia, and probably others that I am not aware of) all looking at age verification for a technology (the internet and all the things it lets you access) has existed for over 2 decades, and has been mature for at least 10 years? You could buy illicit drugs and watch porn on the internet since the 2000s, but it&amp;#39;s NOW that we&amp;#39;re legislating things…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630912&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s all caused by a Meta lobbying initiative across multiple countries as documented in https://tboteproject.com/ (sadly, the website is down right now), but you can find references e.g. https://www.jwz.org/blog/2026/03/the-tbote-project/&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that individual resistance is futile because platforms do not fear losing a small fraction of their user base, others contend that admitting defeat only emboldens those pushing for invasive identification &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630825&quot; title=&quot;It ends with &amp;#39;The platforms need you far more than you need them&amp;#39;.   And I think this is the misconception. No, they don&amp;#39;t. The amount of people who will sign this, is a fraction of a fraction of a &amp;#39;platform&amp;#39;&amp;#39;s users. They will not care if they lose 50,000 users out of 2 Billion. A drop in the ocean. Not the target audience anyway. And that is the real shame. Because I don&amp;#39;t want to have to give my face or do age verification but I know when the time comes, and If I need to use a service now, I…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48631024&quot; title=&quot;I think this kind of comment where you share the sentiment that you will ultimately admit defeat emboldens the factions that are hoping for people to be like you. I also think these kinds of comments may also bring doubt to people considering resisting these kinds of concessions. In other words I think the people pushing these kinds of &amp;#39;identification&amp;#39; methods would love you for spreading their silent message of this being unavoidable knowingly or unknowingly. Even if what you say is correct…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Notable anecdotes highlight the flaws of biometric authentication, such as a user who provided a face scan to Facebook only to be immediately and unappealably banned, illustrating that immutable biometrics offer no recourse for &amp;#34;debugging&amp;#34; identity errors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48631901&quot; title=&quot;I quit facebook over a decade ago.  Then, a few months back, I was under some pressure to sell something, and the facebook marketplace appears to be the way to go locally.  So I tried to create a facebook account. They wanted to scan my face, and in a moment of weakness, I performed the ritual.  Thirty seconds later, they suspended my account due to violations of their terms of service: &amp;#39;this decision cannot be appealed&amp;#39;.  So now they have my face and I still can&amp;#39;t use the marketplace. I can…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Proposed alternatives to face-scanning include leveraging the Tor network for anonymity, utilizing trust graphs based on real-world relationships, or using hardware attestation keys distributed at age-restricted physical locations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48631901&quot; title=&quot;I quit facebook over a decade ago.  Then, a few months back, I was under some pressure to sell something, and the facebook marketplace appears to be the way to go locally.  So I tried to create a facebook account. They wanted to scan my face, and in a moment of weakness, I performed the ritual.  Thirty seconds later, they suspended my account due to violations of their terms of service: &amp;#39;this decision cannot be appealed&amp;#39;.  So now they have my face and I still can&amp;#39;t use the marketplace. I can…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630712&quot; title=&quot;Im sure a lot of people know about tor on this site...but let me remind everyone. Tor is not for criminals. It&amp;#39;s for you and me. And happens to be good enough that criminals use it too. This is the two sided nature of technology. Tor is a networks of peers across the globe volunteering their network bandwidth to support people under oppression by their government. The amount of privacy that can be gained from tor is proportional to the amount of people using it. The more that people utilize the…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48631164&quot; title=&quot;There is actually a way to prove the age anonymously. Yubikey-like devices support attestation - they can have a private key proving authenticity of a device. So some organization could release Yubikeys with a certain private key and distribute them in stores that allow only adult customers - like liquor stores or sex shops. Owning  a key proves that one is adult without disclosing identity. Keys support USB and bluetooth and can be easily supported on any device. Also, OS developers should…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mitchellh.com/writing/zig-donation-2026&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Pledging another $400k to the Zig software foundation&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (mitchellh.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630020&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;810 points · 295 comments · by tosh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mitchell Hashimoto and his family have pledged an additional $400,000 to the Zig Software Foundation, bringing their total support to $700,000 in recognition of the project&amp;#39;s technical progress and commitment to quality. &lt;a href=&quot;https://mitchellh.com/writing/zig-donation-2026&quot; title=&quot;Title: Pledging Another $400,000 to the Zig Software Foundation    URL Source: https://mitchellh.com/writing/zig-donation-2026    Published Time: 2026-06-21T00:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  My family is pledging another $400,000[1](https://mitchellh.com/writing/zig-donation-2026#user-content-fn-1) to the [Zig Software Foundation](https://ziglang.org/zsf/) (ZSF). This brings our total pledged support for ZSF to $700,000, after our [initial donation in…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights the profound satisfaction and social impact of large-scale philanthropy, with some noting that while small donations are personally meaningful, large sums like $400k can visibly transform projects in a way smaller amounts cannot &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630236&quot; title=&quot;It must be pretty satisfying to be able to throw that kind of money at stuff you admire.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630916&quot; title=&quot;You can &amp;#39;throw&amp;#39; what you can afford and it will feel as satisfying. Just try it.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48632164&quot; title=&quot;If you assume Hashimotos net worth is one billion dollars, a $400k donation is equivalent to a $400 donation if your net worth is one million dollars. I don’t believe donating $400 really feels that satisfying, the impact is fairly negligible in most contexts whereas donating $400k can very visibly improve a lot of lives. I think this illustrates just how much a billion dollars is and maybe why a very small wealth tax can be used for a lot of good in society.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue that wealth can buy &amp;#34;less unhappiness&amp;#34; and enable good-willed projects, others debate the scale of such donations relative to billionaire net worths, suggesting that even small wealth taxes could provide significant societal benefits &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630357&quot; title=&quot;I really do not understand how people talk about &amp;#39;Being rich / being a billionaire will make you fundamentally unhappy&amp;#39;. Damn if I had all the money I have so many good-willed projects I want to throw money at!&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48632164&quot; title=&quot;If you assume Hashimotos net worth is one billion dollars, a $400k donation is equivalent to a $400 donation if your net worth is one million dollars. I don’t believe donating $400 really feels that satisfying, the impact is fairly negligible in most contexts whereas donating $400k can very visibly improve a lot of lives. I think this illustrates just how much a billion dollars is and maybe why a very small wealth tax can be used for a lot of good in society.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630707&quot; title=&quot;Money can&amp;#39;t buy happiness, but it can buy less unhappiness. There&amp;#39;s diminishing returns, of course, but I&amp;#39;d hazard it looks a bit like ln(n), in that the returns are quite significant in the beginning.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Beyond the financial aspect, contributors praised the donor&amp;#39;s technical output, specifically the Ghostty terminal, and reflected on the importance of maintaining &amp;#34;weird&amp;#34; and diverse perspectives on the internet &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630786&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s great to be in a position to do this,  however I&amp;#39;m beginning to think that their greater contribution is ghostty I don&amp;#39;t really know how to value things any more when I see someone develop a tool that is kind-of useful that then gets acquired for half a billion dollars.    As someone with a decent number of decades of terminal hopping, the improvement that ghostty has brought a breath of fresh air.  To me it has represented more utility that a few of those acquisitions.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630541&quot; title=&quot;What a word of wisdom right there, the bit about internet is beautiful because it&amp;#39;s ok to be weird - this is often the opposite on twitter, fb, reddit and many discords where if you have a different opinion you get mobbed by angry comments making one feel worse about their own weirdness.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48632055&quot; title=&quot;It is increasingly important to be able to see that many things are true. There is no single &amp;#39;truth&amp;#39;. Many things are true at the same time , and in all aspects of life. Each brain is like a band pass filter, and the effort we should make is to try to imagine the points of view of others, which are just different slices of the same world. Then embrace the slices we like, and just ignore the ones we don&amp;#39;t, but don&amp;#39;t argue or fight for our slice as it if was the only one.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/federal-nuclear-strategy-9.7244509&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Canada plans &amp;#39;nuclear renaissance&amp;#39; with up to 10 reactors built by 2040&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cbc.ca)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48634585&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;592 points · 477 comments · by geox&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Canada has unveiled a $100 billion national strategy to build up to 10 new nuclear reactors by 2040, aiming to double the country&amp;#39;s electricity grid capacity, create 90,000 jobs, and expand international exports of Canadian-made Candu reactors and uranium. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/federal-nuclear-strategy-9.7244509&quot; title=&quot;Title: Energy minister plans &amp;#39;nuclear renaissance&amp;#39; with up to 10 reactors built by 2040    URL Source: https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/federal-nuclear-strategy-9.7244509    Published Time: 2026-06-22T17:08:23.679Z    Markdown Content:  [Politics](https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics)    The federal government is looking to build up to 10 new nuclear reactors over the next 15 years, with at least one of them outside of Ontario.    ## New federal nuclear strategy could cost more than $100B, officials…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Proponents argue that Canada is uniquely positioned for a nuclear renaissance due to its vast uranium reserves, proven CANDU reactor designs, and the need for reliable baseload power to complement intermittent renewables &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48635599&quot; title=&quot;Makes alot of sense.  Canada has: - one of the largest uranium reserves - a well respected and safe nuclear design in CANDU - experience with building and refurbishing nuclear reactors(Darlington) and for Ontario itself A need for more baseload to work with the large amount of solar and wind that Ontario has added in the last 10 years. Saskatchewan also now has a potential need for nuclear for industrial use now that wasn&amp;#39;t present before from its existing population. if the government can…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48636624&quot; title=&quot;Your power storage is the Uranium fuel, which is a better battery than batteries. Much denser and lasts longer. In a sanely designed grid you overprovision non-reliable renewables like solar and wind to provide your peak daytime usage and nuclear (or hydro if you are lucky enough) takes up the rest during the night and when wind is not blowing. Batteries to further flatten the duck curve and provide grid firming as required. Then you have fallback to nuclear and load shedding programs for rare…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics contend that nuclear is economically unviable compared to wind and solar, citing massive cost overruns at projects like Hinkley Point C and the long lead times required for construction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48636837&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand the online obsession with nuclear power in spite of all the evidence that it&amp;#39;s simply not economical. Canada needs new power now. Not 15-20 years from now, which is how long it takes to build a new nuclear power plant. And it can be done today, incrementally with renewable sources and before anyone screams &amp;#39;baseload&amp;#39;, that&amp;#39;s what batteries are for if it really comes down to it. Nuclear power is the highest cost source of electricity in LCOE terms [1]. We just need to look at…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48636518&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Ontario itself A need for more baseload to work with the large amount of solar and wind that Ontario has added in the last 10 years. Chasing baseload is a fool&amp;#39;s game.  You will always have a mismatch between power needed and power produced. Power storage is necessary to move excess power produced to times of excess power need. e.g., shave the peaks to fill the valleys. Any storage reduces the need for baseload and peaker plants. 4-6 hrs move daytime excess solar to fill evening needs.…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some participants view nuclear waste as a solved technical issue hindered only by politics, others argue that the long-term storage and environmental risks remain significant, unresolved externalities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48636837&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand the online obsession with nuclear power in spite of all the evidence that it&amp;#39;s simply not economical. Canada needs new power now. Not 15-20 years from now, which is how long it takes to build a new nuclear power plant. And it can be done today, incrementally with renewable sources and before anyone screams &amp;#39;baseload&amp;#39;, that&amp;#39;s what batteries are for if it really comes down to it. Nuclear power is the highest cost source of electricity in LCOE terms [1]. We just need to look at…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48637339&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Nuclear waste would be the other large remaining issue, but again - society chose to create that problem and not solve it. It&amp;#39;s not technical in nature. Care to explain,  I&amp;#39;ve never seen a genuine solution that goes beyond hand waving,  bad faith arguing,  and aggressiveness.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48637630&quot; title=&quot;For one thing, nuclear power plants produce much less waste than most people imagine. Waste can also be reprocessed into new fuel, further reducing it. In the US, we have a suitable site that has been authorized and cancelled for 20 some years now: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yucca_Mountain_nuclear_waste_r... The reasons it keeps being cancelled, and the waste is stored on-site at nuclear plants instead, is purely political and nothing to do with the technological or safety aspects, according…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48637919&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve never understood how people think &amp;#39;less&amp;#39; solves the issue, it&amp;#39;s not negligible and asking to increase the number of plants surely increases the waste. Reprocessing,  isn&amp;#39;t infinite. There&amp;#39;s going to be waste to deal with. You&amp;#39;ve not presented any technical solutions,  instead you made it political by claiming that&amp;#39;s the only problem. Do you have an actual understanding of the problems or are you just pushing nuclear because it&amp;#39;s aligning with you politically Edit: it&amp;#39;s clear from the down…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ipvm.com/reports/police-chiefs-track&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Flock-Powered Police Chiefs Stalking Women Shows Why Warrants Are Needed&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (ipvm.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48634694&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;643 points · 358 comments · by jhonovich&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A pattern of police chiefs using Flock license plate readers to stalk ex-partners has sparked calls for warrant requirements to prevent high-ranking law enforcement officers from abusing the powerful vehicle-tracking technology for personal surveillance. &lt;a href=&quot;https://ipvm.com/reports/police-chiefs-track&quot; title=&quot;Title: Flock-Powered Police Chiefs Stalking Women Shows Why Warrants Are Needed    URL Source: https://ipvm.com/reports/police-chiefs-track    Published Time: 2026-06-22T17:05:28.000Z    Markdown Content:  PUBLIC - This article does not require an IPVM subscription. Feel free to share.    While Flock claims its system tracks vehicles, not people, the documented record of police chiefs stalking ex-partners through Flock shows otherwise. When the most experienced, highest-ranking officers in law…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the tension between the proven utility of License Plate Readers (LPRs) in solving violent crimes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48636342&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;Flock and law enforcement regularly cite documented cases where LPR helped solve violent crimes, recover stolen vehicles, and locate missing persons. Those outcomes are real. My opposition wouldn&amp;#39;t change regardless but are those outcomes real?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48636568&quot; title=&quot;In Seattle at least, the majority of homicide cases are solved with the assistance of surveillance cameras (though what % of said cameras are specifically Flock, I&amp;#39;m not sure): https://spdblotter.seattle.gov/2026/03/05/new-analysis-rtcc-...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt; and the potential for civil liberties violations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48635979&quot; title=&quot;Check your town&amp;#39;s website for correspondence with your state&amp;#39;s chapter of the ACLU in regards to Flock cameras.  If your police chief (not an elected official) is installing them then contact your local ACLU chapter about it.  These are 4th amendment violations.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that surveillance in public spaces is legally permissible and essential for identifying suspects near crime scenes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48636230&quot; title=&quot;To the contrary, little of what Flock does would be restricted by the 4th amendment. The cameras are in public, and neither the government nor individual citizens need authorization to film people in public. Many Flock cameras are also privately owned, too.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48637181&quot; title=&quot;The hopefully we&amp;#39;ll be able to at least narrow down the list of suspects to the people who entered the bathroom around the time they the murder took place. Surveillance often doesn&amp;#39;t directly capture crime on camera, but is rather used to identify who traveled to and from the crime scene around the time of the incident&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48637527&quot; title=&quot;No? If someone broke into your car as stole your luggage, the surveillance camera might not directly capture the thief breaking into your car. But if the camera recorded someone entering the parking garage and then exiting the garage carrying your luggage a few minutes later, that&amp;#39;s strong evidence is it not?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the current lack of oversight encourages &amp;#34;lazy&amp;#34; policing and that warrants or subpoenas should be required to access such data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48636723&quot; title=&quot;Cops can politely ask owners of private cameras for access for things like murder investigation. If the polite answer is no (most people will say yes), they can go to court for a subpoena. This has happened for a long time. This is how it should work. If the cops are too lazy or chicken to ask a judge while investigating a murder, they don&amp;#39;t deserve the footage.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics warn that the broad tracking of movement, even when not directly capturing a crime, creates a more invasive surveillance state &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48637423&quot; title=&quot;You understand why that&amp;#39;s worse, right?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://unsloth.ai/docs/models/glm-5.2&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GLM-5.2 – How to Run Locally&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (unsloth.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48636377&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;615 points · 304 comments · by TechTechTech&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Z.ai has released GLM-5.2, a 744B parameter open model with a 1M context window that achieves state-of-the-art performance in coding and reasoning. Optimized GGUF versions from Unsloth allow the model to run locally on hardware ranging from 24GB GPUs to 256GB unified memory Macs. &lt;a href=&quot;https://unsloth.ai/docs/models/glm-5.2&quot; title=&quot;Title: GLM-5.2 - How to Run Locally | Unsloth Documentation    URL Source: https://unsloth.ai/docs/models/glm-5.2    Markdown Content:  ⌘Ctrl k    1.   [Models](https://unsloth.ai/docs/models)    ## GLM-5.2 - How to Run Locally    Run the new GLM-5.2 model by Z.ai on local hardware!    GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s new open model, delivering SOTA performance across long-horizon coding, reasoning, and agentic tasks. With **744B parameters**, 40B active parameters, and a **1M context** window, it can now be run locally…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a growing consensus that the gap is closing for running high-quality models like GLM-5.2 locally, which may eventually pressure frontier labs to lower prices or release more capable small models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48637370&quot; title=&quot;I feel like the gap is closing to be able to run good enough models locally even for coding and I would assume it could make some companies a bit nervous. Am I wrong about that?&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48637352&quot; title=&quot;wonder if AMD&amp;#39;s new ai chip can run this with ease? I&amp;#39;m seriously consider buying it. GLM 5.2 is just shy of GPT 5.4 so I would welcome offloading any grunt work locally I am very excited for local LLMs I think we may have GPT 5.5-xhigh level of performance for under 2000 EUR This should put more pressure on the frontier models to avoid sitting on any fancy stuff and lower token prices as a whole. Nothing beats a local LLM disconnected from the cloud.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48637838&quot; title=&quot;If we didn&amp;#39;t have a RAM/GPU shortage right now they would be more nervous than they are. But as it is very few people are going to be able to afford a rig that can run this model effectively. That&amp;#39;s probably not going to change for several more years yet. I think if the Z.ai folks decide to come out with a flash version of GLM-5.2 specialized for coding that came in about about 80B params, then the US frontier labs would probably be more worried. Overall, the Chinese AI companies have been…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that effective local inference requires $50k–$90k in professional hardware to avoid cripplingly slow prompt processing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48637913&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;it can fit&amp;#39; on 256GB of RAM, but it will be heavily quantized and still run very slowly. The headline number is not token generation, its prompt processing. So if you get 10 tok/s and an API gives you 20-30 tok/s, it doesn&amp;#39;t seem that bad on its face, but a mac studio or any other machine that&amp;#39;s not loading all of it into GPU will do PP 20-50X slower than a purely GPU based setup, which is what actually makes this unusable without $50k in GPUs. On top of that, you will still be heavily…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48637747&quot; title=&quot;$500k is a vast overestimation. For massive concurrency at FP8 or even BF16 maybe. NVFP4 at reasonable speeds (~120 tok/s) and concurrency is possible at a $80/90k figure with today&amp;#39;s prices, maybe even less. That buys you 6 RTX 6000 PRO Blackwells, a decent CPU and motherboard, power supply. 576gb of VRAM. You could do it for under $50k if you&amp;#39;re OK with 40 tok/s decode, ~1200 tok/s prefill.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others demonstrate that resourceful &amp;#34;budget&amp;#34; builds using older CPUs and multiple GPUs can achieve usable speeds for under $2,500 &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48639186&quot; title=&quot;I run Q4_K_XL.   All it takes to run to get about 6tk/sec is 512gb of ram and 2 3090 GPUs with llama.cpp -cmoe.   I also have crappy DDR4, 2400mhz, 3200mhz will bring that speed up to about 9tk/sec.  I also have ok 32core epyc CPU, a better 64core would bring it up to about 11tk/sec.  I did a budget build before the crazy hardware cost and I regret it everyday.   Nevertheless, it&amp;#39;s fantastic being able to run this model at home.   It&amp;#39;s great for planning, one shot prompting once you have a plan…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite the high VRAM and RAM requirements for Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) offloading &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48637098&quot; title=&quot;So close! My machine with 192GB RAM + RTX 3090 24GB can almost run this. It says it needs 24GB of VRAM and 256GB of RAM for MoE offloading. https://unsloth.ai/docs/models/glm-5.2#usage-guide In a prior thread, someone said it would take $500k in hardware: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48629970&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, proponents argue that the independence from cloud APIs and the potential for private corporate hosting make these local setups increasingly attractive &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48639186&quot; title=&quot;I run Q4_K_XL.   All it takes to run to get about 6tk/sec is 512gb of ram and 2 3090 GPUs with llama.cpp -cmoe.   I also have crappy DDR4, 2400mhz, 3200mhz will bring that speed up to about 9tk/sec.  I also have ok 32core epyc CPU, a better 64core would bring it up to about 11tk/sec.  I did a budget build before the crazy hardware cost and I regret it everyday.   Nevertheless, it&amp;#39;s fantastic being able to run this model at home.   It&amp;#39;s great for planning, one shot prompting once you have a plan…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48637493&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think so.  I could easily see a company deciding to host and run these models for their own development.  If you have a dev team of about 10 people, a one time $50k investment in an LLM server has to be pretty tempting.  Unlimited tokens, decent performance, upgrade options, and potential product integrations. For companies wanting LLMs in their products in general, I have to think going the local llm route is even more tempting.  Somewhat dumb models are more than good enough for a lot…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techstackups.com/comparisons/glm-5.2-vs-opus/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GLM 5.2 vs. Opus&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (techstackups.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48626866&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;519 points · 343 comments · by ritzaco&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a head-to-head coding test, Claude Opus 4.8 outperformed the new open-weights GLM-5.2, building a cleaner 3D game in half the time. While GLM-5.2 is significantly cheaper and leads the open-model market, its lack of vision and higher bug rate make it less polished than Opus. &lt;a href=&quot;https://techstackups.com/comparisons/glm-5.2-vs-opus/&quot; title=&quot;Title: GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus    URL Source: https://techstackups.com/comparisons/glm-5.2-vs-opus/    Published Time: 2026-06-18T00:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  GLM-5.2 just came out, and it&amp;#39;s another step forward for what open models can do. The internet promptly freaked out, and it&amp;#39;s hard to tell what&amp;#39;s real and what&amp;#39;s hype.    So we ran it head-to-head against Claude Opus 4.8: same one-shot prompt, build a 3D platformer in raw WebGL from scratch. Here&amp;#39;s our take after running the test and digging…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on whether &amp;#34;one-shot&amp;#34; benchmarks for coding models are meaningful, with critics arguing that real-world value lies in agentic reliability, steerability, and the ability to follow complex plans rather than single prompts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48627190&quot; title=&quot;I seriously dont&amp;#39; know all this big hullabaloo about one shot prompting. by definition, a single prompt wont&amp;#39; constitute the complexity of a software project. ergo, what you&amp;#39;ll get is a series of assumptions made by the model based on preexisting code in its training corpus. I&amp;#39;d rather see a coding agent that can follow steps in a plan file to a T while following guardrails and adhering to the proper coding conventions in the human reviewed spec. Id rather see performance in agent loops against…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48629625&quot; title=&quot;The streetlight effect: &amp;gt; A policeman sees a drunk man searching for something under a streetlight and asks what the drunk has lost. He says he lost his keys and they both look under the streetlight together. After a few minutes the policeman asks if he is sure he lost them here, and the drunk replies, no, and that he lost them in the park. The policeman asks why he is searching here, and the drunk replies, &amp;#39;this is where the light is&amp;#39; All of your suggestions are better but they&amp;#39;re hard, so…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48627015&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; So we ran it head-to-head against Claude Opus 4.8: same one-shot prompt, build a 3D platformer in raw WebGL from scratch Running a single one-shot prompt is not a benchmark, not is it representative of any sort of real-world usage. Most agent usage is collaborative so you need to test things like reliability (when I delegate a task, does it complete it without making up test results for e.g.) and steerability (does it obey my instructions or does it just do what it thinks is best).&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While GLM 5.2 is praised for producing idiomatic, non-intrusive code and outperforming competitors on price and specific web dev benchmarks, users report it is significantly slower than GPT and prone to initial hallucinations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48627068&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve been checking out GLM 5.2 on some projects and few thoughts on it: - it takes it sweet time to get code rolling, not the fastest model by any means - it strays a lot during discovery/planning but then corrects - it&amp;#39;s not steering friendly, as it hallucinates things that it doesn&amp;#39;t follow later on - its output is quite good A sample use case: I was optimizing rendering on Swift+Zig codebase. It chocked on 5k data entries. GLM 5.2 spent 20 minutes building the benchmarks and getting data…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48627297&quot; title=&quot;Pretty clearly it&amp;#39;s beating Opus at [web dev]( https://www.gptbased.com/ ) - on price, on score.. I mean what else is there?&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Furthermore, consensus suggests that GLM&amp;#39;s adoption may be hindered by the lack of competitive subscription models for individuals and security concerns regarding Chinese APIs in corporate environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48627693&quot; title=&quot;GLM 5.2 has one big issue that will limit its meaningful success and that&amp;#39;s the value of their coding subscription. Yes, in terms of API pricing, GLM 5.2 outperforms the competition. But the only people that use API billing for their coding work are large corporations, where these highly subsidized subscriptions are being fazed out. At the same time, none of these companies will use a Chinese API for their employees. For individuals and smaller teams, Z.ai&amp;#39;s coding subscription is outperformed…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48627062&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;On output tokens, GLM-5.2 is less than a fifth the price of Opus. Opus is most expensive model in pay as you go model, but IMO fair comparison should include subscription price as well. For example when one has $100 Claude Max and use it up through the month, it might not be more expensive than GLM, or at least not 5x.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/LarsAnders1620/status/2068208864747540516#m&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Danish privacy activist Lars Andersen raided by police&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (twitter.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48625823&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;434 points · 412 comments · by I_am_tiberius&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Danish police conducted a raid on the home of privacy activist Lars Andersen, according to a social media post shared by the activist. &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/LarsAnders1620/status/2068208864747540516#m&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;LarsAnders1620&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;2068208864747540516#m&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;xcancel.com&amp;amp;#x2F;LarsAnders1620&amp;amp;#x2F;status&amp;amp;#x2F;206820886474754051...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are divided on Lars Andersen’s tactics, with some arguing that his harassment of politicians&amp;#39; families and use of GPS trackers crosses a line that damages his cause &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48626117&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m Danish and lars kragh andersen is a bit of a grey zone. He obviously goes over the line, he tried to put GPS trackers on the cars of ministers. He &amp;#39;stalks&amp;#39; their families, and dox their children online. He gave an interview on how he&amp;#39;d ignore people carrying a kilo gram of weed when he was a cop because he doesn&amp;#39;t agree with the &amp;#39;war on drugs&amp;#39;. On the flip-side, he&amp;#39;s sort of right. I assume that putting a GPS tracker on the car of our minister of justice is illegal, but that same minister…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48627304&quot; title=&quot;Not if it&amp;#39;s detrimental to their cause. E.g. the just-stop-oil people have only garnered haters. A successful case might be Luigi Mangione.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48627065&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ll take &amp;#39;Actions that will backfire and you come across as the villain&amp;#39; for $100 Alex&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others contend that extreme actions are necessary for activists to &amp;#34;shake people&amp;#34; and impose costs on those in power &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48626928&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; He goes way too far though that&amp;#39;s what activist have to do to shake people&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48627162&quot; title=&quot;Worked for the IRA. Working for Hamas. Working for the Islamic Republic. Cowards would have you believe otherwise, but force is sometimes the only way to get what you want. It really doesn&amp;#39;t matter if you come across as the villain as long as you impose great enough costs for not delivering your desired reality.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. This debate over the efficacy of radical protest draws comparisons to both historical movements and modern controversial figures, questioning whether such methods lead to meaningful change or merely justify increased state surveillance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48628181&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; that&amp;#39;s what activist have to do to shake people That&amp;#39;s also the line most terrorist groups use. Its not exactly wrong i suppose. 9/11 did get Americans to think about the middle east a lot more.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48627790&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;A successful case might be Luigi Mangione. Sorry, but how was that murder successful? Did it achieve the effect that everyone is getting cheaper healthcare now? OR, on the contrary, it only achieved that CEOs are now getting more anonymity and private security, while the plebs are getting more invasive law enforcement tracking like Palantir and Flock shoved up their ass to prevent them from doing something like that again?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48628757&quot; title=&quot;The difference between terrorists and freedom fighters is a matter of which side of the fence you stand on. They are basically the same thing, especially these days when you get marked as terrorist for talking bad about the people in power.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/28224&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Codex logging bug may write TBs to local SSDs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (github.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48626930&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;508 points · 271 comments · by vantareed&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI has patched a Codex bug where excessive SQLite feedback logging could write up to 640 TB of data annually, potentially destroying SSD endurance. The fix reduces log volume by 85% by filtering noisy TRACE events and WebSocket telemetry that previously caused massive write amplification. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/28224&quot; title=&quot;Codex SQLite feedback logs can write ~640 TB/year and rapidly consume SSD endurance · Issue #28224 · openai/codex    Update at Jun 22, 2026: the following 2 PRs are merged today, it could avoid 85% logs(feedback from my codex), so let me close this issue. Thanks @jif-oai for the fix. #29432 #29457 Following is th...    [Skip to content](#start-of-content)    ## Navigation Menu    Toggle navigation    [Sign in](/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fopenai%2Fcodex%2Fissues%2F28224)    Appearance…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users report that Codex and other AI tools suffer from severe performance issues, such as 100% GPU usage for simple UI elements, massive memory leaks, and excessive disk writes that threaten SSD endurance &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48627194&quot; title=&quot;Codex is one of the most infamous examples of slopware. Just having the window unhidden on my mac will cause it to use 100% of the GPU displaying the spinner message. THE SPINNER MESSAGE CAUSES 100% GPU USAGE ON AN MBP M5!! So any time you&amp;#39;re waiting on the model (which is 90% of the time), your fans will be blasting (careful, don&amp;#39;t use it on battery). The issue is on github and close to 6 months old. Probably since the release of vibe coded junk. I would literally fix it myself but it&amp;#39;s closed…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48628061&quot; title=&quot;Not only Codex, but I can&amp;#39;t leave ChatGPT app in macOS open for few hours, because it will consume 60 gigabytes of RAM over time and crashes all the apps. Mindboggling. Or can&amp;#39;t use Google&amp;#39;s AI Studio in browser because it takes 100% CPU. Need to write own app for everything???&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some attribute this &amp;#34;slopware&amp;#34; to the &amp;#34;vibe coding&amp;#34; trend and a lack of polish in AI-driven development &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48627194&quot; title=&quot;Codex is one of the most infamous examples of slopware. Just having the window unhidden on my mac will cause it to use 100% of the GPU displaying the spinner message. THE SPINNER MESSAGE CAUSES 100% GPU USAGE ON AN MBP M5!! So any time you&amp;#39;re waiting on the model (which is 90% of the time), your fans will be blasting (careful, don&amp;#39;t use it on battery). The issue is on github and close to 6 months old. Probably since the release of vibe coded junk. I would literally fix it myself but it&amp;#39;s closed…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48628254&quot; title=&quot;if we are at 10x with AI and near AGI or ASI, then how is it possible that these products (Codex, Claude Code CLI) are still such garbage? shouldn&amp;#39;t this &amp;#39;agentic AI revolution&amp;#39; have long solved this already? no way they&amp;#39;re over there saying &amp;#39;we are on it plz wait&amp;#39; or that &amp;#39;it&amp;#39;s too much effort&amp;#39;?&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48627602&quot; title=&quot;Vibe coding takes &amp;#39;move fast and break things&amp;#39; to a whole nother level.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, others argue these are typical engineering oversights common in human-written software &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48627229&quot; title=&quot;This thread will become a typical &amp;#39;haha slop company made slop&amp;#39; but I&amp;#39;ve been bitten by a bug exactly like this before in a (pre-AI, artisan) OSS project. The maintainer there didn&amp;#39;t properly account for DST when calculating last backup time, so the app started and never stopped writing/re-writing backups continuously. Perhaps the framing shouldn&amp;#39;t be &amp;#39;haha slop&amp;#39; but rather why doesn&amp;#39;t the AI write better quality software than we do? To which the answer is obvious IMO -- even emergent…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48629110&quot; title=&quot;Like anything, you have to decide between polish vs switch to any other task in the queue. If you choose too much from the latter, then polish suffers, yet that&amp;#39;s a human thing. Also, Codex and Claude Code aren&amp;#39;t as bad as people say. I think most of the noise is embellished by the &amp;#39;hah see? AI sucks&amp;#39; angle. It&amp;#39;s kind of like how HNers would claim to your face that you can&amp;#39;t actually build anything with Javascript and Node.js (JS just sucks too much), then they&amp;#39;d list off a few footguns that…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also frustration regarding interoperability, specifically Claude&amp;#39;s refusal to support standard configuration files like `AGENTS.md`, forcing users to rely on manual workarounds &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48629719&quot; title=&quot;Claude is also weird for being the only coding assistant that for some reason doesn&amp;#39;t support AGENTS.md. Codex, Amp, Cursor all of them support it and read from it, but not claude which forces it&amp;#39;s users to use CLAUDE.md instead. The issue is the higest voted issue on their gitlab repo: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/6235&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48629831&quot; title=&quot;My CLAUDE.md is just: @AGENTS.md And Claude processes it just fine. (I see that it&amp;#39;s a common workaround, and there&amp;#39;s a comment in the above link saying just this: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/6235#issuec... ) It&amp;#39;s a hassle having to add it to every repo that I use Claude with though, and I often use other models and harnesses too for the more trivial tasks.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48632144&quot; title=&quot;I beg people to learn what symlinks are. The fact that &amp;#39;put @AGENTS.md in there&amp;#39; is a &amp;#39;common workaround&amp;#39; shows why programmers (good ones at least) are not going anywhere soon.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://explorer.oxide.computer/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Oxide computer 3D rack guided tour&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (explorer.oxide.computer)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48631450&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;472 points · 209 comments · by darthcloud&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oxide Computer Company has launched an interactive 3D Explorer tool that allows users to take a guided tour or perform a self-paced hardware inspection of their cloud computer&amp;#39;s components. &lt;a href=&quot;https://explorer.oxide.computer/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Oxide 3D Explorer    URL Source: https://explorer.oxide.computer/    Published Time: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 13:46:55 GMT    Warning: This page maybe not yet fully loaded, consider explicitly specify a timeout.    Markdown Content:  # Oxide Cloud Computer 3D Explorer    [Oxide Computer Company 3D Explorer](https://oxide.computer/)    Cloud Computer     Options    We use cookies to improve your experience and assist our marketing team. [Privacy policy](https://oxide.computer/privacy-policy)    * * *    Reject…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oxide Computer’s 3D rack tour sparked a debate between those who admire their &amp;#34;modern Sun Microsystems&amp;#34; engineering ideology and critics of their &amp;#34;writing-intensive&amp;#34; hiring process &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48677155&quot; title=&quot;I want Oxide to do so well. The product is a breath of fresh air in the era of cloud providers. As an engineer, I&amp;#39;d kill to get to work with their hardware. Not to mention that working at Oxide sounds like a modern Sun Microsystems with the ideology that team has. Highly recommend their podcast &amp;#39;Oxide and Friends&amp;#39;, and their original &amp;#39;On The Metal&amp;#39; show. I&amp;#39;ve attempted to apply to their company multiple times over the years, only to be stun locked by the application process. Not because it&amp;#39;s a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48678542&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not sure what &amp;#39;mess&amp;#39; you&amp;#39;re referring to -- that we have a writing-intensive hiring process?  That we get a lot of applicants?  That we therefore end up rejecting a bunch of people?  That we read application materials thoroughly?  That we don&amp;#39;t provide specific feedback on individual applicants (even though we explicitly state that/why we don&amp;#39;t)? To state clearly what I feel we have said many times:  Yes, it&amp;#39;s hard to get a job at Oxide.  Yes, we get a lot applicants.  Yes, we ask a lot of…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While the company defends its high-friction application as a necessary filter for an elite team, applicants report &amp;#34;shady&amp;#34; experiences, including being ghosted after completing extensive homework or waiting six months for a canned rejection &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48677852&quot; title=&quot;Just a gentle reminder that a company may portray itself as cool to customers, but is not cool to their own current or future employees. Their interview process was shady. There was a post here about 1-2 years ago that was a link to their interview process and how open and transparent they were. The post itself was from an employee and a fellow commenter who was gaslighting folks was also an employee. Several folks complained about the tremendous amount of homework they had to do after the…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48678542&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not sure what &amp;#39;mess&amp;#39; you&amp;#39;re referring to -- that we have a writing-intensive hiring process?  That we get a lot of applicants?  That we therefore end up rejecting a bunch of people?  That we read application materials thoroughly?  That we don&amp;#39;t provide specific feedback on individual applicants (even though we explicitly state that/why we don&amp;#39;t)? To state clearly what I feel we have said many times:  Yes, it&amp;#39;s hard to get a job at Oxide.  Yes, we get a lot applicants.  Yes, we ask a lot of…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48680677&quot; title=&quot;The particular &amp;#39;mess&amp;#39; I&amp;#39;ve encountered was I applied (wrote 11 pages of interview material) on 2024/09/29 and then received a canned &amp;#39;yeah whoops sorry for taking this long, not interested&amp;#39; on 2025/03/24. That&amp;#39;s almost 6 months of delay from submission to first contact. Terrible process. You need to give feedback early if you&amp;#39;re not interested in someone, not leave them hanging for nearly half a year.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters suggested that substantial interview work should be paid or strictly time-limited to remain humane, though others argue such systems are difficult to scale when managing thousands of applicants &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48677960&quot; title=&quot;Devils advocate (really not affiliated with oxide, but I have worked for a “desirable” employer before). How would you handle a few thousand applicants for a single role? I think no matter what you do it will feel inhumane, we can argue that a few hours of work for a take home test is inhumane too, being ghosted after doing one definitely wouldn’t pass my personal bar of acceptability, but if its the first stage and the task would take a properly qualified applicant less than 30 minutes then I…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48678070&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s a simple answer, if someone is doing a substantial amount of work for your interview process, pay them an amount of money that is more than zero but less than &amp;#39;do job interviews for a living&amp;#39;. Or provide that amount times two to a charity of their choice. I&amp;#39;ve done this for hiring before, for people who reached the &amp;#39;put substantial effort in&amp;#39; stage (in my case basically 2nd or 3rd round work sample stuff), and it was a great way to make sure we got good signal and they felt respected.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48678326&quot; title=&quot;“put substantial effort into it” is such a personal thing. DDG hires like this, actually, and if I recall correctly I would be paid a flat fee, it would take a week , and the work I did would be part of something genuine in DDG, maybe a bug or something. Now, that probably sounds good to you, but taking a week out of my current employment is not going to happen- there’s an incentive to go “over the hours” inherent to the ask, even if you’re paying me a flat rate, I might lose to someone equally…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48678431&quot; title=&quot;Thousands of applicants reaching the substantial work stage is a failure of the systems thinking you&amp;#39;re talking about. Hundreds of resumes nearly always gets narrowed down to perhaps a dozen or two at most at the screening stage. And I would make it very clear that putting in more than 30 minutes of work, timed, is a disqualifier, and I would sleep well at night clearing all those people out of the queue.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://urflow.bearblog.dev/jobs-and-software-is-fucked/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Jobs and Software Is Fucked&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (urflow.bearblog.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48635112&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;324 points · 304 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A software engineer with a decade of experience details the &amp;#34;exhausting&amp;#34; state of the 2026 job market, citing dehumanizing AI-proctored filters, recruiter silence, and the industry&amp;#39;s push toward AI-generated code as major barriers to finding employment. &lt;a href=&quot;https://urflow.bearblog.dev/jobs-and-software-is-fucked/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Jobs and Software is Fucked    URL Source: https://urflow.bearblog.dev/jobs-and-software-is-fucked/    Published Time: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 19:48:23 GMT    Markdown Content:  _19 Jun, 2026_    Or how I decided to scream into the void about how awful the job market is. I&amp;#39;m still in a very sour mood after the latest rounds of interviews but ultimately this is my blog and a way to let off some of that sourness.    For reference: I&amp;#39;m a software engineer of about 10ish years of experience. I&amp;#39;ve worked for a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The software and creative industries are experiencing a deep existential crisis, with some arguing that refusing to use AI is a matter of professional dignity and solidarity with displaced colleagues &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48635528&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I&amp;#39;ve seen people supposedly smarter than I advocate for just giving in, conceding to AI coding as it&amp;#39;s the future. But doing so means tossing out my friends who make art or the people who work their asses off to properly test and review code or the writers pouring all of their energy into even mundane dialogue. It means throwing out my dignity Conflating things in this inflammatory way is a big mistake. Using a technology employers want you to use is not betraying your friends. Not everything…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48635598&quot; title=&quot;I think you might not get the context this is coming from, it’s about a game developer laid off from Blizzard not wanting to partake in the technology that will justify layoffs of their friends. Pretty straight forward to me.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48635474&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not like the job market was that much better before AI infested every single corner of the market, but it supercharged all of the worst aspects of everything. I&amp;#39;ve seen people supposedly smarter than I advocate for just giving in, conceding to AI coding as it&amp;#39;s the future. But doing so means tossing out my friends who make art or the people who work their asses off to properly test and review code or the writers pouring all of their energy into even mundane dialogue. It means throwing out…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. However, others contend that AI adoption is an inevitable requirement for future employment, though even that may not save most software roles from eventually disappearing &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48635631&quot; title=&quot;You will not have a job in software in the future if you refuse to use AI. I fully stand behind that prediction. edit: despite the downvotes, I&amp;#39;ll double down: most of today&amp;#39;s software jobs will disappear. Your job , if it is in software, will disappear. It might transform into something new, if you&amp;#39;re lucky. Or it might just go away entirely.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48635736&quot; title=&quot;For the vast majority of people who currently have a job in software... you will not have a job in software in the future whether you use AI or not. The tide is coming for almost all of us.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. This volatility has led some professionals to find greater stability and satisfaction by pivoting to skilled trades, treating technology as a hobby rather than a career &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48635711&quot; title=&quot;After 5+ years of actively trying to get into the field (pre AI), I left. I threw my degree in the toilet, I closed my linkedin, and I went to go work in the trades as a diesel mechanic. Greatest choice I&amp;#39;ve ever made. The pay is great, the work is steady, the coworkers are relaxed and not trying to one up each other. I&amp;#39;m now being paid to go to school, and get raises every year until I&amp;#39;m fully ticketed (way more than I ever made in the entry tech positions). I&amp;#39;ve heard non-stop my whole life…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48636114&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m a car guy, and a computer guy. I wanted a nice car, so instead of racking up mega debt on a $70,000 mustang I bought an old classic car and learned everything. After 5 years I fully restored it on the cheap (less than $10k) and now I&amp;#39;ve pivoted my career to that.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While business developers may see AI as an empowering tool, it remains &amp;#34;existentially terrifying&amp;#34; in the arts and gaming sectors, where it directly replaces human labor and creates intense social friction &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48635603&quot; title=&quot;The author is coming from the games industry. As an arts based industry, AI is EXTREMELY divisive.  The author really will lose friends over even so much as touching AI in certain ways, because the artists that built the games industry were already badly abused, and now, they&amp;#39;re being squeezed out entirely. For business developers, AI is somewhat less existentially terrifying, as it can be seen to be really empowering to an experienced user. In the games industry, AI usage immediately…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.autodidacts.io/dostoyevsky-isnt-difficult/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Dostoyevsky isn&amp;#39;t difficult&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (autodidacts.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48631366&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;245 points · &lt;strong&gt;310 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by surprisetalk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that Dostoyevsky and other Russian classics are unfairly labeled as difficult, noting that their prose is actually lucid, humorous, and accessible compared to other complex literary works. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.autodidacts.io/dostoyevsky-isnt-difficult/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Dostoyevsky isn’t difficult    URL Source: https://www.autodidacts.io/dostoyevsky-isnt-difficult/    Published Time: 2026-01-18T06:47:13.000Z    Markdown Content:  When I was twelve or fourteen I got halfway through War and Peace. Unfortunately, the vagaries of Russian names befuddled me, and pretty soon I didn’t know what was going on and didn’t really care. But for a long time after this point, I carried the fat paperback around, and read it ostentatiously at the coffee shop where the pretty…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Readers describe Dostoevsky’s work as visceral and engaging, noting that *Crime and Punishment* functions as an &amp;#34;edge-of-your-seat&amp;#34; thriller despite its literary status &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668658&quot; title=&quot;I was blown away by Crime and Punishment.   I truly felt like I was the main character, and I read it with feverish sweat and dread for my impending doom. I cringed and felt terrible sadness at the poor little lives of certain individuals. So much woe and tragedy.   I was glad to see how it turned out though. I&amp;#39;m currently reading Karamazov and it&amp;#39;s good to have something a bit more jovial and dry witted. The main difficulty is the names. The names make it so hard. I love the Space Trilogy by…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48631556&quot; title=&quot;I also stumbled onto Crime and Punishment at 18 and expected it to be difficult and was blown away with how Dostoyevsky wrote one of the greatest novels of all time, to be sure, but as the author here says, also how engaging he made it. The scene where he commits the crime is an absolute stunner, edge-of-your-seat, thriller.  Who does that?  Who can pull that off?  Dostoyevsky&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. While some find certain novels like *The Brothers Karamazov* to be a &amp;#34;slog,&amp;#34; the primary barrier for non-Russian speakers is the naming convention, where characters are referred to by three-part names or non-obvious nicknames like Sasha for Alexander &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48671443&quot; title=&quot;I think the problem with Russian names in particular is that a Russian name has three parts (e.g. Nikolai Ivanovich Lobachevsky) and different parts get used in different contexts, depending on who&amp;#39;s speaking, level of familiarity and so on. So it&amp;#39;s like in an English novel where someone might be referred to as Smith by the narrator but John in dialogue, but with an extra 50%, at least, of confusion.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48671503&quot; title=&quot;There are also the &amp;#39;canonical&amp;#39; nicknames that are not obvious to non-Russian speakers. E.g. Nikolai is Kolja.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48671500&quot; title=&quot;The obscure Russian nicknames! How is anybody supposed to know without being told that Sasha and Alexander are the same guy? (I do realize that while some English nicknames like Johnny for John are pretty self-explanatory, other like Jack for John or Dick for Richard are as opaque to foreigners as Alexander/Sasha)&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668077&quot; title=&quot;I thoroughly enjoyed Crime and Punishment, The Idiot, and White Nights, but I&amp;#39;m finding myself slogging through Karamazov. I&amp;#39;m about 600 pages in and its picking up at least. Banking on it all being worth it in the end. Normally I subscribe to the quote &amp;#39;life&amp;#39;s too short to read a bad book&amp;#39;, but making an exception for Dostoyevsky.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. There is significant debate regarding the Russian tradition of teaching these complex works to teenagers; some argue it alienates young readers from classics, while others contend that analyzing difficult texts is a vital skill comparable to learning advanced science or math &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48669117&quot; title=&quot;As a Russian native speaker who graduated from the high school  in Russia many years ago, one thing that I don&amp;#39;t really understand is why these great works of Russian literature are included in the school must read list. An average teenager, myself included, always has some better things to do than reading a huge novel, barely understanding characters&amp;#39; motivations, because neither of these books were ever intended for teens. Those who find time later in their adult life will re-read the classics…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48669458&quot; title=&quot;Are kids &amp;#39;ready&amp;#39; to deal with organic chemistry? Or integrals?  Do you think that more people will need the knowledge of the reproductive system of plants than the skill of reading and uderstanding large texts? Not simply understanding the words, but actually analyzing and comprehending what&amp;#39;s being said&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://patrickmccanna.net/the-text-in-claude-codes-extended-thinking-output-is-not-authentic/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The text in Claude Code’s “Extended Thinking” output&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (patrickmccanna.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630535&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;326 points · 225 comments · by 0o_MrPatrick_o0&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Claude Code’s &amp;#34;extended thinking&amp;#34; logs provide only an encrypted signature and a summary of the model&amp;#39;s reasoning, rather than the actual logic used, with full access to the original reasoning blocks restricted to Anthropic and enterprise-level agreements. &lt;a href=&quot;https://patrickmccanna.net/the-text-in-claude-codes-extended-thinking-output-is-not-authentic/&quot; title=&quot;Title: The text in Claude Code’s “Extended Thinking” output is not authentic. – blog    URL Source: https://patrickmccanna.net/the-text-in-claude-codes-extended-thinking-output-is-not-authentic/    Markdown Content:  Claude Code records each session to disk. Those logs include “thinking blocks” — the model’s own reasoning as it works.    I went to inspect that reasoning this weekend and found a `signature` (600 characters long) and no text.    So I read the docs:…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the industry-wide practice of hiding or summarizing AI &amp;#34;thinking&amp;#34; processes, which some view as a necessary measure to protect R&amp;amp;D investments and competitive moats &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48631232&quot; title=&quot;This is not just Anthropic. Almost all big AI companies, including OpenAI and Google, hide their model&amp;#39;s actual reasoning. This is because revealing the raw reasoning exposes exactly how the AI processes information.   These companies spend in huge amounts on R&amp;amp;D to develop a thinking process that is superior to their competition. Exposing those thinking mechanics to competitors would completely defeat the purpose of their spending. They simply won&amp;#39;t do it. It&amp;#39;s like you telling your exact…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48631036&quot; title=&quot;When you have no moat, you have to try and find desperate ways to manufacture one.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. However, critics argue that obscured reasoning creates significant security risks, such as the potential for prompt injection attacks to hide malicious actions or data exfiltration within hidden reasoning chains &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48631634&quot; title=&quot;I won&amp;#39;t use or recommend models with hidden reasoning, (thats all American models). It&amp;#39;s too much of a risk and makes prompt optimization harder. Risky because it makes it possible for an attacker to prompt inject the reasoning chain to carry out a secret objective, and to hide that from the summary and output. Interleaved reasoning and function calling makes this even more dangerous. A model can call functions during the hidden reasoning phase. An attacker could then exfiltrate data from you…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some believe the transparency is withheld to avoid alarming users with the &amp;#34;illegible&amp;#34; nature of AI logic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48632213&quot; title=&quot;I believe that chain-of-thought reasoning blocks don&amp;#39;t really correspond to what humans think of as reasoning. (See section 6.2.2 of the Fable/Mythos system card about &amp;#39;illegible reasoning&amp;#39;, and the questions raised by the Apple paper on &amp;#39;The illusion of thinking&amp;#39;.) I assumed they obscure the reasoning blocks because if users saw what&amp;#39;s going on they&amp;#39;d be alarmed. Just as I&amp;#39;d probably be alarmed if I saw what was really going on in the heads of my colleagues ...&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, others note that major vendors currently mitigate certain risks by discarding reasoning tokens between turns &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48631940&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve thought about the high-jacking of reasoning-chains as a potential vector, but never saw a proven implementation in american models since, from my understanding, all major vendors throw out the reasoning tokens between turns.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.washingtonpost.com/obituaries/2026/06/22/alan-greenspan-most-powerful-central-banker-modern-times-dies-100/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Alan Greenspan has died&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (washingtonpost.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48628731&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;239 points · &lt;strong&gt;252 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by helsinkiandrew&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alan Greenspan, the influential former Federal Reserve chairman who led the U.S. central bank for nearly two decades, has died at the age of 100. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.washingtonpost.com/obituaries/2026/06/22/alan-greenspan-most-powerful-central-banker-modern-times-dies-100/&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;tSlDZ&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;archive.ph&amp;amp;#x2F;tSlDZ&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.cnbc.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;06&amp;amp;#x2F;22&amp;amp;#x2F;alan-greenspan-former-chairman-of-the-fed-dies-at-age-100.html&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;www.cnbc.com&amp;amp;#x2F;2026&amp;amp;#x2F;06&amp;amp;#x2F;22&amp;amp;#x2F;alan-greenspan-former-chairm...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion surrounding Alan Greenspan’s death centers on his legacy as a proponent of the gold standard, which he argued promoted responsible spending and economic equality &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630121&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m not a gold bug but Alan was a proponent of the gold standard.  He wrote about how the gold standard created responsible spending and more equality in the world: https://ritholtz.com/2008/11/gold-and-economic-freedom-by-al... The world we are in now, especially in the US, is one where there is near unlimited government credit but it is, according to many, papering over deep structural problems.  At some point, these chickens will come home to roost in some way or another.  But it is hard to…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics challenge this view, citing historical evidence that the gold standard failed to prevent inequality during the Gilded Age and exacerbated the Great Depression by limiting central bank flexibility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630448&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; He wrote about how the gold standard created responsible spending and more equality in the world: The Gilded Age, which had quite high levels of inequality, occurred when the gold standard was active: * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilded_Age It should also be noted that the gold standard did not bring any kind of price stability: * https://archive.is/https://www.theatlantic.com/business/arch... Further, sticking to the gold standard made the Great Depression worse as it reduced flexibility…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48632417&quot; title=&quot;I am aware of today&amp;#39;s inequality (e.g., I read Piketty back when he was making a splash). But the critique is that Greenspan argued gold standard = less inequality and that fails on the historical record. If we want to talk about the causes of the &amp;#39;New Gilded Age&amp;#39; that&amp;#39;s something else. As a general starting point I&amp;#39;d begin with: * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedman_doctrine * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reaganomics * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thatcherism&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users defend Greenspan by noting the 20 years of growth under his tenure &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630269&quot; title=&quot;It was generally 20 years of growth and the 2008 banking crisis actually happened after he left.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others hold him responsible for setting the stage for the dot-com bust and the 2008 financial crisis &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630170&quot; title=&quot;He also oversaw the economy for twenty years before one of the worst recessions in the world.  He helped set the stage for multiple disasters with his policies, so I&amp;#39;d take his opinions with a grain of salt.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630309&quot; title=&quot;And when production for a system I built burns down the month after I leave my job, the next guy they hire was actually the culprit!  Greenspan was seen as responsible for the dot-com bust as well which was solidly in the center of his tenure.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the thread features a debate on modern fiscal policy, with some arguing that current debt levels will inevitably lead to high inflation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630519&quot; title=&quot;39 trillion in debt with no Congressional stomach for... - spending cuts - stopping fraud - figuring out how the net worth of people in Congress increases from hundreds of thousands of dollars to 10s or 100s of millions of dollars - addressing wasteful and ineffective programs Given those issues, the only solution will be inflation. The circling the drain moment will hit with the associated welfare programs get a direct staple to inflation itself, so we will spend more to combat inflation,…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, while others advocate for a return to deflationary currency to allow citizens to benefit from technological progress &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630986&quot; title=&quot;I have come around to gold. Money shouldn&amp;#39;t be dual purposes, we should apply single responsibility principal. Money should refer to some stable (albeit slightly growing by nature) account of measure. Prices should get cheaper. That&amp;#39;s a progress dividend. We get better at growing food every year, why shouldn&amp;#39;t food get cheaper? Imagine a world in which prices regularly go down. You&amp;#39;re a passive beneficiary of technological progress. The argument that prices can&amp;#39;t get cheaper or [bad thing will…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48632539&quot; title=&quot;Gold Standard is probably a force that acts against inequality but the forces pushing inequality today are just much stronger. Technology that creates winner take all markets and incredible leverage with few people being one.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://spur.us/blog/smart-tv-apps-residential-proxy-sdks&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Nearly half of LG smart TV apps contain residential proxy SDKs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (spur.us)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48635954&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;271 points · 176 comments · by microcode&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A study found that over 2,000 apps on LG and Samsung smart TVs contain residential proxy SDKs that sell users&amp;#39; home IP addresses to third parties. These SDKs often run in the background of simple apps like clocks or games, potentially exposing home networks to security risks. &lt;a href=&quot;https://spur.us/blog/smart-tv-apps-residential-proxy-sdks&quot; title=&quot;Title: Nearly Half of LG Smart TV Apps Contain Residential Proxy SDKs    URL Source: https://spur.us/blog/smart-tv-apps-residential-proxy-sdks    Markdown Content:  _Everyone worries about the apps on their phone. Almost no one looks at the ones on their TV. We scanned 6,038 of them across LG and Samsung; 2,058 were selling your IP address._    On screen, it&amp;#39;s a relaxing fish tank. Or a clock. Or solitaire. Or puppies. Under the hood, it is a [residential…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discovery of residential proxy SDKs in third-party LG TV apps has reignited debates over the &amp;#34;subsidized&amp;#34; nature of smart TVs, with some arguing that users must choose between paying a premium for commercial displays or accepting invasive monetization in free apps &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48637576&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ll get on my high horse and say you can get solid &amp;#39;DID/Commercial&amp;#39; TVs for not that much more: https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1788343-REG/samsung_q... I got this a few months ago -- 4k, solid brightness, and ok color. Is it the OMG BEST? no. But I Disabled wifi, and even the channel display. I use it with an apple TV with CEC on the TV -- I turn on the apple tv, TV turns on straight to apple interface. I turn off from the apple remote, TV turns off. It&amp;#39;s effectively &amp;#39;an apple TV&amp;#39; --…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48637221&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not Smart TV apps specifically, it&amp;#39;s all free apps. They have to monetize those somehow, don&amp;#39;t they? And you get upset when you see ads, don&amp;#39;t you? Basically it&amp;#39;s either this or pay for your apps.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48637132&quot; title=&quot;Because most people (HN is not a representative sample set) are not willing to pay the real price of a TV if it wouldn&amp;#39;t be subsidized by adtech.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users advocate for never connecting a smart TV to the internet and using external hardware like an Apple TV or a firewalled mini-PC &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48637576&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ll get on my high horse and say you can get solid &amp;#39;DID/Commercial&amp;#39; TVs for not that much more: https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1788343-REG/samsung_q... I got this a few months ago -- 4k, solid brightness, and ok color. Is it the OMG BEST? no. But I Disabled wifi, and even the channel display. I use it with an apple TV with CEC on the TV -- I turn on the apple tv, TV turns on straight to apple interface. I turn off from the apple remote, TV turns off. It&amp;#39;s effectively &amp;#39;an apple TV&amp;#39; --…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48637570&quot; title=&quot;Never ever connect your &amp;#39;Smart&amp;#39;-TV to your network, or if you have an incurable impulse to then make sure it&amp;#39;s on a firewalled gateway-less VLAN.  Take the money you save buying the thing (compared to what a profitable &amp;#39;dumb&amp;#39; version would cost) and buy a surplus corporate mini-workstation system, and slap LibreELEC/Kodi or whatever on it, and use that device as your &amp;#39;smart&amp;#39; device.  No good for you can ever come from bringing the TV onto the internet... ever! (Also: never paypig, never…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, others suggest rooting the device to remove spyware or simply buying the cheaper subsidized hardware and keeping it offline &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48637603&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;Is it the OMG BEST? no. But I Disabled wifi, and even the channel display. Why not just get a (presumably subsidized) smart TV instead, and skipping the premium? It&amp;#39;d also be not disconnected from the internet, and despite vague HN/reddit speculation that TVs have cell modems in them, that has yet to be confirmed.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48637989&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;ve heard this wisdom before, usually with an apple TV positioned as the alternative, but I&amp;#39;ve had that setup before and didn&amp;#39;t enjoy having to use 2 remotes instead of one. A better solution would be to root the damn TV and neuter its spyware/adware crap.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong consensus that such hidden background activities should be illegal, alongside concerns that these same malicious SDKs likely exist on other smart TV platforms hosting the same third-party apps &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48636876&quot; title=&quot;This needs to be illegal.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48636909&quot; title=&quot;This does raise the question if other Smart TVs with the same third party apps have the same issue.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hustvl.github.io/Moebius/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Moebius: 0.2B image inpainting model with 10B-level performance&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (hustvl.github.io)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630171&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;321 points · 83 comments · by DSemba&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moebius is a lightweight 0.22B-parameter image inpainting framework that matches the performance of 10B-level models like FLUX.1-Fill-Dev. By utilizing a restructured diffusion backbone and adaptive distillation, it achieves a 15× inference speedup while using less than 2% of the parameters of larger industrial models. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hustvl.github.io/Moebius/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Moebius Project Page    URL Source: https://hustvl.github.io/Moebius/    Published Time: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 20:32:02 GMT    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1](https://hustvl.github.io/Moebius/image_assets/logo_dynamic_woWaterMark.gif)    ## Moebius: 0.2B Lightweight Image Inpainting Framework with 10B-Level Performance    (*) Equal Contribution, (†) Project Leader, (📧) Corresponding Author.    1 Huazhong University of Science and Technology 2 VIVO AI Lab    ## Abstract    While 10B-level industrial foundation…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights Moebius as a practical application of AI, though some users criticize the &amp;#34;clickbaity&amp;#34; marketing language used to describe its technical efficiency &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48632836&quot; title=&quot;This is the useful AI stuf. There’s so many usecases this makes possible.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48634495&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;  The core insight of Moebius can be summarized in a single equation:  Synergy × (Architecture + Distillation) = Shattering the &amp;#39;Impossible Triangle&amp;#39; of Low Parameters, Fast Inference, and High Quality Is it just me or is it weird seeing these clickbaity AI-generated taglines in an otherwise scientific work?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. While there is interest in using the model for e-commerce and architectural visualization, an anecdote about a previous Stable Diffusion project warns that inpainting can produce bizarre, unsolicited artifacts like &amp;#34;creepy&amp;#34; figures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48631654&quot; title=&quot;What is the current SOTA for impainting? I have a potential project for my e-commerce where I want to allow users to upload images of their house exteriors and impaint awnings.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48634906&quot; title=&quot;I did an inpainting project for a client a few years ago. They were trying to inpaint banner ads for concert promoters, and find a way to make it easy to produce a bunch of different sized ads for a variety of placements. I was tasked with inpainting Xmas themed ad for a few major singers. The weirdest thing was when the inpainting tool added strange people to an image. This singer was all decked out in tinsel and red, and the inpainting model added a grumpy old man in a top hat. I don&amp;#39;t recall…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, the project&amp;#39;s name sparked a debate regarding the ethics of using the legacy of artist Jean Giraud (Moebius) to promote generative AI &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630959&quot; title=&quot;Unrelated but when I read inpainting and Moebius I was scared it was related and using the art of the great Jean Giraud [0] a.k.a. Moebius https://characterdesignreferences.com/artist-of-the-week-3/m... [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Giraud&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48632214&quot; title=&quot;Scared for the same reason I found last year&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;Ghibli filter&amp;#39; craze upsetting, I would have personally hated to have seen this artist&amp;#39;s legacy used for promoting AI image generation.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48632678&quot; title=&quot;In case that happened then the rest of the world would probably appreciate the art, and a subset of it, the artist (and even a small subset of ~whole Internet-connected population is a lot of people ). Some silver lining, perhaps.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sakana.ai/fugu/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sakana Fugu&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sakana.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48624782&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;246 points · 126 comments · by Finbarr&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sakana AI has launched Sakana Fugu, a multi-agent system that dynamically orchestrates multiple specialized AI models through a single OpenAI-compatible API to solve complex tasks. Available in &amp;#34;Fugu&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;Fugu Ultra&amp;#34; versions, the system uses learned coordination strategies to outperform individual frontier models in coding, reasoning, and research. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sakana.ai/fugu/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Sakana Fugu — Multi-agent System as A Model    URL Source: https://sakana.ai/fugu/    Published Time: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 05:30:10 GMT    Markdown Content:  One Model to Command Them All マルチエージェントを指揮する、一つのモデル    Frontier-level performance without single-vendor dependency. Fugu dynamically orchestrates the world&amp;#39;s best models to tackle complex, multi-step tasks. Plug collective intelligence directly into your workflows today with a single API.Sakana Fugu…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the emerging trend of $200/month subscription tiers for AI services, which some users find excessive compared to cheap APIs or local models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48625597&quot; title=&quot;You pay $200/month to Anthropic, $200/month to OpenAI, $200/month to Cursor, $200/month to $200/month to Google, and seeing that it didn&amp;#39;t come to a nice round $1024/month, you pay $200/month to Sakana to coordinate it all, because why not. While you&amp;#39;re at it, feel free to send me $200 as well, I&amp;#39;ll generate a crypto address ending with &amp;#39;AI&amp;#39;.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48625674&quot; title=&quot;Pay $0 to run a local model or even a cheap DeepSeek V4 model via their API which is close to free per million tokens. These prices are just going to get raced to $0.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48625691&quot; title=&quot;Maybe. But for now it&amp;#39;s fascinating how $200/month has kind of become a normal tier. It&amp;#39;s similar to how AirPods normalised all of us having $300+ headphones. All of us would have scoffed at the idea a decade ago.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some participants defend the pedigree and drive of Sakana’s leadership, others criticize the company’s shift from frontier research to B2B applications and its involvement in military contracts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48626261&quot; title=&quot;I probably will never pay to Sakana, as they are involved in military contracts. https://japannews.yomiuri.co.jp/politics/defense-security/20...&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48627325&quot; title=&quot;There are so many derisive comments here. David Ha, CEO and co-founder, was one of the youngest managing director at Goldman Sachs before doing ML at Google.  His ML publications were considered top-notch almost a decade ago.  I had high hopes for him when he raised money and  founded Sakana. I do agree with some comments here that perhaps this particular product is not well thought out.  I also agree with the criticism that David calls Sakana a frontier AI lab while making money just selling…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong consensus toward using aggregators like OpenRouter or local alternatives to avoid high costs and maintain flexibility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48625674&quot; title=&quot;Pay $0 to run a local model or even a cheap DeepSeek V4 model via their API which is close to free per million tokens. These prices are just going to get raced to $0.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48625945&quot; title=&quot;Or use openrouter and switch to model you want to use..(i think so)&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48626014&quot; title=&quot;Or TrustedRouter if you want privacy and open source&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://gizmodo.com/mexico-just-showed-off-a-new-extremely-cheap-government-backed-ev-2000769080&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mexican government unveils a prototype for a new homegrown, ultra-affordable EV&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (gizmodo.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48632652&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;201 points · 162 comments · by speckx&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum unveiled the Olinia Uno, a government-backed, ultra-affordable electric vehicle prototype expected to launch next summer for approximately $8,500. &lt;a href=&quot;https://gizmodo.com/mexico-just-showed-off-a-new-extremely-cheap-government-backed-ev-2000769080&quot; title=&quot;Mexico Just Showed Off a New Extremely Cheap, Government-Backed EV    Whether it&amp;#39;ll be allowed across the border remains to be seen.    [Skip to content](#main)    [Gizmodo](https://gizmodo.com)    * [Latest](https://gizmodo.com/latest)  * [News](https://gizmodo.com/tech)  * [Reviews](https://gizmodo.com/reviews)  * [io9](https://gizmodo.com/io9)  * [Science](https://gizmodo.com/science)  * [Deals](https://gizmodo.com/deals)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Mexican Olinia One&amp;#39;s 77-mile range is viewed as a &amp;#34;non-starter&amp;#34; for the American market, though some argue it could serve as a secondary vehicle for daily commutes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48633739&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It remains to be seen whether the Olinia One will face similar pushback from the U.S. once it goes on sale. &amp;gt; can travel up to 125 kilometers (77 miles) on a single charge The US market generally rejects small-range EVs, except in very niche markets. In order to succeed in the US, it will need roughly 3-4x the range. In order for this to succeed in Mexico, their market will need different driving habits than the typical American. (I know this as a former 2014 Leaf lessee. Short-range EVs only…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48633888&quot; title=&quot;I know absolutely nothing about Mexico in terms of geography or driving so I wonder how feasible an EV that you presumably constantly have to charge is going to fare. In the US, a range of 77 miles is a complete non starter. You&amp;#39;d have to charge it every single day. If not multiple times a day in some peoples cases. It&amp;#39;s interesting that info about the car is only half the article. The other half is a commentary on how US politicians are desperately trying to keep foreign EVs out of the…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48634140&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; In the US, a range of 77 miles is a complete non starter. You&amp;#39;d have to charge it every single day. If not multiple times a day in some peoples cases. It&amp;#39;s true that some people drive more than 77 miles per day. But a pretty big chunk of people never do, except road trips/vacations. It could easily be worth it to buy a cheap EV for everyday use and then rent a vehicle for long trips.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Commenters debate whether the U.S. should protect its domestic industry through tariffs and subsidies or allow cheap imports to force local innovation &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48634058&quot; title=&quot;The Ford CEO is not wrong. Allowing foreign imports into the country at prices far below what US producers are able to make will decimate the local car industry in the US. There are 4 possible solutions to this problem; a) convince Americans that it&amp;#39;s worth paying more for a locally built product. This is the simplest approach, but there&amp;#39;s only so much margin here that the consumer will tolerate. At the moment this gap is too large. b) Tariff foreign imports to raise their cost. So the US…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48635023&quot; title=&quot;Why is decimating our local car industry a problem? Why not build something else with the resources if cars are now a cheap commodity?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48635526&quot; title=&quot;The US didn&amp;#39;t go from #1 in global auto manufacturing to nearing extinction on accident. The companies shifted production abroad because they didn&amp;#39;t want to pay for US labor. We can&amp;#39;t just pray for &amp;#39;development&amp;#39; to spark a chain reaction that gets us back on track - we were the most developed and consciously chose to squander that advantage. Onshoring can be done, but it will have a real cost someone will have to bear. The industry would prefer consumers just pay twice as much for cars,…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is also concern that U.S. manufacturers have abandoned the &amp;#34;basic transportation&amp;#34; niche for high-margin SUVs, potentially repeating the failure of the Tata Nano if they cannot balance cost and utility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48634433&quot; title=&quot;This seems to fill a useful niche, but may be too downscale. Remember the Tata Nano.[1] Tata built a basic car with a price below 1 lahk, but it didn&amp;#39;t sell. In the US, there&amp;#39;s Slate, which claims to be making a small electric pickup truck.  &amp;#39;Preorders will start on June 24, 2026. First deliveries are slated for late 2026.&amp;#39; [2] Price in the US$20K range, they claim. Claimed range is 150m with the base model battery. A larger battery is available. It&amp;#39;s America&amp;#39;s answer to the kei car. If it ships…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48634773&quot; title=&quot;The tariff route is what happened in the 1970s under the &amp;#39;chicken tax&amp;#39;, which still exists today to protect the US light truck industry, and is pretty much the reason why SUVs reign supreme in the US market.  SUVs are classified as &amp;#39;light trucks&amp;#39;, which has caused a Galapagozation of the US car industry/market.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.davidrevoy.com/article1154/why-drawing-tablet-brands-wont-collaborate-on-linux-floss-drivers&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why Drawing Tablet Brands Won&amp;#39;t Collaborate on Linux Floss Drivers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (davidrevoy.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48629064&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;233 points · 117 comments · by Tomte&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Major drawing tablet brands like Huion and Gaomon are refusing to collaborate on open-source Linux drivers because the existing technical infrastructure is branded under their competitor, Wacom, leading to concerns over brand identity and the perceived sharing of proprietary specifications. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.davidrevoy.com/article1154/why-drawing-tablet-brands-wont-collaborate-on-linux-floss-drivers&quot; title=&quot;Title: Why Drawing Tablet Brands Won&amp;#39;t Collaborate on Linux FLOSS Drivers    URL Source: https://www.davidrevoy.com/article1154/why-drawing-tablet-brands-wont-collaborate-on-linux-floss-drivers    Markdown Content:  Published on 22 june 2026    [![Image 1: A digital painting illustration with large brush strokes of a sandbox. This one has a label: Linux drawing tablet driver, and is also branded with many Wacom ads. Inside it, a cute penguin labeled Wacom is the only one to play. Three other penguin,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The primary barrier to collaboration on Linux tablet drivers is the historical &amp;#34;Wacom&amp;#34; branding of core repositories, which discourages competitors from contributing to what they perceive as a rival-led project &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48629965&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Well, because it&amp;#39;s true: many of the repositories are named after &amp;#39;Wacom&amp;#39;. It&amp;#39;s a historical legacy on GNU/Linux. It&amp;#39;s also a decade-long debate that these repos should be renamed differently. If the project being named after Wacom is actively causing other companies to not contribute because they believe it’s a Wacom lead project and they’d be helping a competitor, I don’t understand why this is even a debate vs. just changing the name to something vendor neutral.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue the resistance to renaming is an emotional attachment or a &amp;#34;disease&amp;#34; that hinders software adoption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630036&quot; title=&quot;And it&amp;#39;s been a decade long argument? Sounds like someone is just emotionally attached to something not changing. Those are the hardest problems to solve.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48631217&quot; title=&quot;Preach. And it&amp;#39;s a disease . Signed, the guy who will forever believe GIMP could have been a contender with a name change decades ago.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others point to the logistical burden of updating extensive documentation and broken links &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630486&quot; title=&quot;Not necessarily. The technical people managing the repos might just be opposed to name changing in general (seeing how a boatload of links, references, documentation would require updating, some of which you don&amp;#39;t even control), and meanwhile those people might feel the &amp;#39;misbranding&amp;#39; drawbacks much less (if at all).&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48631331&quot; title=&quot;I would categorize all those as emotional reasons not to change, not logical reasons. &amp;#39;It&amp;#39;s hard!&amp;#39; So?  &amp;#39;It&amp;#39;s complicated&amp;#39; So?  &amp;#39;Some of it other people control.&amp;#39; This will always be the case, you can&amp;#39;t let the perfect be the enemy of the good enough. If the status quo means a worse project, then you&amp;#39;re not changing because you don&amp;#39;t WANT to, not because it&amp;#39;s a good idea. And that&amp;#39;s an emotional, not logical ,decision.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. The debate draws parallels to the &amp;#34;master&amp;#34; vs. &amp;#34;main&amp;#34; branch renaming, with users divided on whether such non-technical changes are performative or serve a necessary purpose for project growth &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630156&quot; title=&quot;main vs master&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48631061&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Well, because it&amp;#39;s true: many of the repositories are named after &amp;#39;Wacom&amp;#39;. It&amp;#39;s a historical legacy on GNU/Linux. It&amp;#39;s also a decade-long debate that these repos should be renamed differently. Okay... let&amp;#39;s rename them then? I know it&amp;#39;s silly, but, well, we&amp;#39;ve went through the whole pointless `master` -&amp;gt; `main` branch rename in so many projects which was much more disruptive -- at least this one could serve a purpose?&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48631181&quot; title=&quot;I find it interesting that you think this rename serves a purpose when the master to main rename does not. Neither change has any technical reason. The only reason why either name change was desired is because some contributors were upset by the names.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Top HN · 2026-06-21</title><link>https://hn.alcazarsec.com/daily?date=2026-06-21</link><author>ALCAZAR</author><description>&lt;p&gt;0. &lt;a href=&quot;https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14328960-identity-verification-on-claude&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Identity verification on Claude&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (support.claude.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48618455&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;675 points · 574 comments · by bathory&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthropic may require Claude users to complete identity verification by providing a government-issued ID and a selfie to prevent platform abuse and ensure compliance with its Terms of Service. &lt;a href=&quot;https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14328960-identity-verification-on-claude&quot; title=&quot;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;#39;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;old.reddit.com&amp;amp;#x2F;r&amp;amp;#x2F;ClaudeAI&amp;amp;#x2F;comments&amp;amp;#x2F;1ubm53n&amp;amp;#x2F;official_anthropic_to_require_identity&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;nofollow&amp;#39;&amp;gt;https:&amp;amp;#x2F;&amp;amp;#x2F;old.reddit.com&amp;amp;#x2F;r&amp;amp;#x2F;ClaudeAI&amp;amp;#x2F;comments&amp;amp;#x2F;1ubm53n&amp;amp;#x2F;official_...&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The introduction of identity verification for high-end LLMs is viewed by many as a &amp;#34;pointless&amp;#34; measure that fails to stop sophisticated adversaries while burdening legitimate users &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48621109&quot; title=&quot;Its a very well known fact that all of our geopolitical adversaries have sophisticated fake American ID markets. This doesn&amp;#39;t stop any of the most dangerous adversaries from getting access to systems protected by this technology. DeepSeek is going to go buy 20,000 fake IDs for their fake distillation accounts and keep on keeping on. This just hurts normal people, Americans and non-Americans, who might struggle to authenticate or be disallowed because of their place of birth. Pointless CYA, and…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. Critics argue these restrictions, alongside potential &amp;#34;shadow-nerfing&amp;#34; of accounts, undermine AI neutrality and incentivize users to migrate toward local models or international competitors like Mistral &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48621207&quot; title=&quot;The US is really shooting itself in the foot here. The restrictions on LLM models like Fable has created a viable international LLM market where it was  difficult to justify investment two weeks ago. As a non-US citizen Opus 4.8 is the best American LLM I will ever have access to. That&amp;#39;s no longer up for debate or question. Each month that I pay Anthropic is now a depreciating value -- I&amp;#39;m paying for models I&amp;#39;ll never be able to access, while other models are able to catch up. Adding US based…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48618546&quot; title=&quot;Let us hope this only accelerates the proliferation of local models&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48618766&quot; title=&quot;You risk being silenly flagged and get nerfed responses. Somehting like shadow dumbed down.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48618482&quot; title=&quot;Funny how no-one talks about AI neutrality like we used to discuss net neutrality. We literally now enter a space where not only you will have to prove your identity with a gov issued ID, but they will silently block you if they deem you try to use it in a way that they don&amp;#39;t like. It is literally similar to a situation where your ISP would investigate all sites you visit and limit your bandwidth if they don&amp;#39;t like the the ones you enter...&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some note that such export controls and verification pages are not entirely new, others warn that failing these opaque processes can lead to permanent lockouts from top-tier models &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48618606&quot; title=&quot;OpenAI also has this kind of check. What is especially bad is that if you fail the verification process, they won’t let you retry – you are permanently locked out from the top models. They aren’t clear about this upfront during the process, so make sure the lighting is good when you scan your ID! https://help.openai.com/en/articles/10910291-api-organizatio...&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623135&quot; title=&quot;Despite what’s being implied everywhere, this ID check page has been there since April. Wayback Machine if you don’t believe me: https://web.archive.org/web/20260415064244/https://support.c... &amp;gt; As a non-US citizen Opus 4.8 is the best American LLM I will ever have access to. That&amp;#39;s no longer up for debate or question. This is a crazy conclusion for a situation that isn’t even two weeks old. LLMs are not the first tech product that have been restricted by export controls. These situations pass.…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.apnic.net/2026/04/28/google-hits-50-ipv6/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Google Hits 50% IPv6&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (blog.apnic.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616800&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;391 points · &lt;strong&gt;417 comments&lt;/strong&gt; · by barqawiz&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google has reached a significant milestone with 50% of its users now accessing services via IPv6, according to its April 2026 measurements. While APNIC Labs reports a lower global capability of 42% due to different statistical weighting models, the data confirms IPv6 is now a mature, globally deployed protocol. &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.apnic.net/2026/04/28/google-hits-50-ipv6/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Google hits 50% IPv6 | APNIC Blog    URL Source: https://blog.apnic.net/2026/04/28/google-hits-50-ipv6/    Published Time: 2026-04-28T09:14:56+10:00    Markdown Content:  # Google hits 50% IPv6 | APNIC Blog  [Skip to content](https://blog.apnic.net/2026/04/28/google-hits-50-ipv6/#content)    [![Image 4: APNIC Home](https://webdist.data.apnic.net/web-framework-theme/9.1.5/images/apnic-reverse.svg)](https://blog.apnic.net/)    ![Image…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Google reports 50% IPv6 adoption, users highlight a significant &amp;#34;tragedy of the commons&amp;#34; where major ISPs like Virgin Media have failed to fulfill decade-old promises to switch &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48617787&quot; title=&quot;Just to add to the &amp;#39;but the ISPs do not&amp;#39; anecdotes, it has been six months since someone last commented so it is probably time to mention this again on Hacker News: * https://havevirginmediaenabledipv6yet.co.uk/ A major ISP in the U.K., that said in a public statement on World IPv6 Day in 2011 that &amp;gt; As well as our core and access networks being capable of supporting IPv6, we&amp;#39;re rigorously testing our entire network to ensure that all customers have a smooth and simple transition when the time…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48618396&quot; title=&quot;depends on how you look at it. Right now it&amp;#39;s very much a tragedy of the commons. IPv6 not being supported in many places means the internet is more centralised, less likely to use proper p2p tech- because it&amp;#39;s a lot harder to make it work rather than throwing up a TURN box and relaying everything. &amp;#39;The latency? Who cares? IPv6 sometimes breaks right now&amp;#39; - because nobody is testing it, so why should people be the first to support it? There&amp;#39;s no easy upside. The only real upside for businesses…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents argue that IPv6 already offers a superior experience by bypassing the latency of CGNAT &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48617032&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; a better web experience than IPv4 That&amp;#39;s already the case. IPv6 is often faster because most ISPs these days use cgnat for IPv4.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48618396&quot; title=&quot;depends on how you look at it. Right now it&amp;#39;s very much a tragedy of the commons. IPv6 not being supported in many places means the internet is more centralised, less likely to use proper p2p tech- because it&amp;#39;s a lot harder to make it work rather than throwing up a TURN box and relaying everything. &amp;#39;The latency? Who cares? IPv6 sometimes breaks right now&amp;#39; - because nobody is testing it, so why should people be the first to support it? There&amp;#39;s no easy upside. The only real upside for businesses…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;, but skeptics counter that there is little business incentive to transition since most consumers see no direct benefit and IPv4 remains the universal standard &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48617898&quot; title=&quot;Purely from a business perspective, for VM there is no point. They have more than enough v4 to keep them going, customers (outside of a tiny technical minority who probably wouldn&amp;#39;t chose VM anyway) do not see any benefit. That plus other ISPs v6 implementations breaking things randomly, I understand why they don&amp;#39;t bother.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48618363&quot; title=&quot;Of all the things to regulate why bother with this one? It&amp;#39;s not like IPv6 is better for the environment or useful to the consumer.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616994&quot; title=&quot;I wonder if there will ever come a day when IPv6 will provide a better web experience than IPv4. At the moment pretty much every website is reachable via IPv4 but a lot not via IPv6. Will there be a day when this turns around?&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. This stagnation has led to a divide between those calling for government regulation to force adoption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48618328&quot; title=&quot;Right. Which is why this is not a choice businesses should be allowed to make.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; and those viewing their remaining IPv4 allocations as increasingly valuable financial assets &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48617075&quot; title=&quot;Noooo, my /22 IPv4 subnet allocation is my personal 401k, I need this money to retire.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48617142&quot; title=&quot;Time to cash in?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sandimetz.com/blog/2016/1/20/the-wrong-abstraction&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Prefer duplication over the wrong abstraction (2016)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sandimetz.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620090&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;454 points · 309 comments · by rafaepta&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sandi Metz argues that duplication is cheaper than the wrong abstraction, advising developers to re-introduce duplication when shared code becomes cluttered with conditionals rather than persisting with a flawed design due to the sunk cost fallacy. &lt;a href=&quot;https://sandimetz.com/blog/2016/1/20/the-wrong-abstraction&quot; title=&quot;The Wrong Abstraction — Sandi Metz    I&amp;#39;ve been thinking about the consequences of the &amp;#39;wrong abstraction.&amp;#39; &amp;amp;nbsp;My RailsConf 2014 &amp;#39;all the little things&amp;#39; talk included a section where I asserted: &amp;amp;gt; duplication is far cheaper than the wrong abstraction And in the summary, I went on to advise: &amp;amp;gt;    * [Home](/)  * [Products](/products)  * [Courses](/courses)  * [Speaking](/speaking)  * [Blog](/blog)  * [About](/about)  * [Contact](/contact)    * [Home](/)  * [Products](/products)  *…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The debate centers on whether the maintenance burden of duplicated code outweighs the complexity of a &amp;#34;wrong&amp;#34; abstraction, with some arguing that duplication is a sensible default until a clear pattern emerges &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620596&quot; title=&quot;Hardly iconoclastic, it&amp;#39;s a very sensible suggestion. It would be iconoclastic if the common sense basic approach would be to start with abstraction. It&amp;#39;s not, the common sense default is to write possibly duplicate behavior until you actually discover several cases to abstract away, until you bevalop a sensible idea of which functionality unites them and which doesn&amp;#39;t carry over all of them. &amp;gt; Once you have an awkward number of customers (more than five and less than a hundred), maintaining…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620530&quot; title=&quot;Code duplication is cheaper than the wrong abstraction. If you have a good abstraction, you should run with it. If you haven&amp;#39;t figured out a good abstraction at 5-100 customers, God help you.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents of the article suggest that premature abstraction destroys code locality and forces developers to manage &amp;#34;invisible&amp;#34; long-distance coupling &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620636&quot; title=&quot;I believe that &amp;#39;single source of truth&amp;#39; is a principle that should always be followed. If there&amp;#39;s duplicated code where it&amp;#39;d be a bug if they diverge, then you should refactor. It creates a long-distance coupling in your code that may be invisible to future developers until a bug emerges. But with that in mind, I mostly agree with the article: if it&amp;#39;s not a violation of &amp;#39;single source of truth&amp;#39;, then abstractions are just a convenience. If it starts being inconvenient, then it&amp;#39;s not doing its…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48621485&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; I believe that &amp;#39;single source of truth&amp;#39; is a principle that should always be followed Fundamentally, the article addresses cases where it&amp;#39;s not clear yet how many sources of truth there will be.  Are the two spots in the code using the same algorithm, or slightly different versions?  More importantly, will they change for the same sorts of reasons? The title adage (correctly, imo) argues that making two different things the same will cause you more pain than making two same things different…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, while critics contend that duplication is unsustainable at scale and leads to developer burnout when fixing the same bug across multiple locations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620465&quot; title=&quot;No it&amp;#39;s not. This has always been a needlessly iconoclastic rather than sensible suggestion. At the very least it is not once you&amp;#39;re working at the wrong kind of scale. Once you have an awkward number of customers (more than five and less than a hundred), maintaining duplicated code that should have been abstracted and modularised will only seem cheap if you don&amp;#39;t mind that you burn through even junior employees at a pace. And in the LLM era the wrong kind of scale appears in different ways;…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620680&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Maintaining the wrong abstraction, or, god help, abstractions, would be even worse. Hard disagree. When you&amp;#39;ve had to chase through a change in untold and actually unknown numbers of duplications of code in different permutations and fix them because they are all on fire simultaneously, you&amp;#39;d disagree too. A bad abstraction would at least have had one fire in one place.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, the consensus leans toward following the &amp;#34;single source of truth&amp;#34; principle, though participants disagree on whether a flawed abstraction is easier to fix than scattered, duplicated logic &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620636&quot; title=&quot;I believe that &amp;#39;single source of truth&amp;#39; is a principle that should always be followed. If there&amp;#39;s duplicated code where it&amp;#39;d be a bug if they diverge, then you should refactor. It creates a long-distance coupling in your code that may be invisible to future developers until a bug emerges. But with that in mind, I mostly agree with the article: if it&amp;#39;s not a violation of &amp;#39;single source of truth&amp;#39;, then abstractions are just a convenience. If it starts being inconvenient, then it&amp;#39;s not doing its…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620680&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Maintaining the wrong abstraction, or, god help, abstractions, would be even worse. Hard disagree. When you&amp;#39;ve had to chase through a change in untold and actually unknown numbers of duplications of code in different permutations and fix them because they are all on fire simultaneously, you&amp;#39;d disagree too. A bad abstraction would at least have had one fire in one place.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48621788&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; as if duplication would be the root of all evil And instead it gets replaced with the actual root of all evil, complexity.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.beyondallreason.info&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Beyond All Reason (Free Total Annihilation Inspired RTS)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (beyondallreason.info)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48617990&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;465 points · 272 comments · by mosiuerbarso&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The free real-time strategy game *Beyond All Reason* is transitioning to professional development and partnering with publisher Hooded Horse to prepare for a full release on Steam. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.beyondallreason.info&quot; title=&quot;Title: Beyond All Reason ★ RTS    URL Source: https://www.beyondallreason.info/    Published Time: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 20:38:15 GMT    Markdown Content:  # Beyond All Reason ★ RTS    ALPHA    [![Image 5](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/5c68622246b367adf6f3041d/66f94bf43835f103fe529d9f_BAR-Beyond-All-Reason-Logo-20-Simple-NoGlow-V2.svg)](https://www.beyondallreason.info/ &amp;#39;Beyond All Reason RTS&amp;#39;)    [Battles](https://www.beyondallreason.info/active-battles &amp;#39;See what Battles are running right…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While *Beyond All Reason* is praised as a technically impressive successor to *Total Annihilation*, the community faces significant criticism for toxic behavior and a rigid adherence to the &amp;#34;meta&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48618604&quot; title=&quot;Great game, technically impressive, but the community can be quite mean and toxic. I played for around a year after having played other TA Spring RTS for a few years prior, and if you don’t follow the exact meta of the month (whatever that might be) in terms of build order and things, people can get really aggro and your team can vote to kick you and take your units. Also, one particularly aggravating part of the community is that it’s considered courtesy to surrender once the front line is…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48618830&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s amazing the degree to which streaming/online communities around video games have destroyed the games themselves. Every update to every game launches a large scale effort to find the &amp;#39;meta&amp;#39; which is then instantly disseminated to the most try-hard assholes on the Internet. Anyone who dares to develop their own strategy/style/loadout is up against hordes of people (a growing proportion every day) who just copy whatever the Youtubers figured out.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. Players report being harassed or kicked for not following specific build orders, and some note a frustrating dynamic where veteran players claim low-stress positions while blaming newcomers for failures on the front line &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48618604&quot; title=&quot;Great game, technically impressive, but the community can be quite mean and toxic. I played for around a year after having played other TA Spring RTS for a few years prior, and if you don’t follow the exact meta of the month (whatever that might be) in terms of build order and things, people can get really aggro and your team can vote to kick you and take your units. Also, one particularly aggravating part of the community is that it’s considered courtesy to surrender once the front line is…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While the game&amp;#39;s community manager encourages reporting harassment and suggests &amp;#34;rotato&amp;#34; lobbies for a more relaxed experience, others argue that the rise of online streaming has fundamentally &amp;#34;destroyed&amp;#34; modern gaming by standardizing playstyles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48618830&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s amazing the degree to which streaming/online communities around video games have destroyed the games themselves. Every update to every game launches a large scale effort to find the &amp;#39;meta&amp;#39; which is then instantly disseminated to the most try-hard assholes on the Internet. Anyone who dares to develop their own strategy/style/loadout is up against hordes of people (a growing proportion every day) who just copy whatever the Youtubers figured out.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48619639&quot; title=&quot;Hey, PtaQ here, BAR’s Community Manager. I’m sorry this was your experience. There are definitely some very competitive lobbies, but harassment is not acceptable. Please report any players involved, as reports are the only way we can identify patterns and take action. We have an active moderation team and do review them. For a more relaxed experience, I’d recommend trying less established meta maps. Lobbies marked “rotato” rotate maps after every game and are usually among the chillest. Players…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, some users raised concerns regarding the project&amp;#39;s future and potential commercialization, though others pointed out that the game&amp;#39;s open-source license limits such moves &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48618670&quot; title=&quot;Theres been some drama with this game where a few of the core admins have claimed ownership and sold out to a publisher. They are taking the free open source game and selling it on steam with a free demo. In addition to the toxic community, its made the whole thing a bit radioactive. Curious to see how it all plays out.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48618739&quot; title=&quot;Well, they can&amp;#39;t sell out the game code. That&amp;#39;s not how GPL works.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/06/260614012006.htm&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The brain was not designed for this much bad news&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (sciencedaily.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48615569&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;397 points · 314 comments · by colinprince&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A record number of people are avoiding the news due to &amp;#34;news fatigue,&amp;#34; a psychological response caused by an ancient brain wired for local survival being overwhelmed by a constant global stream of negative information. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/06/260614012006.htm&quot; title=&quot;Title: Your brain was never designed for this much bad news    URL Source: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/06/260614012006.htm    Markdown Content:  During several recent conversations, people have told me that they’ve stopped checking their phones in the morning. Not because nothing was happening, but because everything was. They described the feeling as standing under a waterfall of perpetual bad news.    This experience is far from an isolated one. According to [Reuters Institute’s 2025…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the psychological toll of global news, with many arguing that individuals are overwhelmed by crises they cannot influence, leading to a state of &amp;#34;doing nothing&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48615675&quot; title=&quot;Neil Postman called this the “Peekaboo World”. “What steps do you plan to take to reduce the conflict in the Middle East? Or the rates of inflation, crime and unemployment? What are your plans for preserving the environment or reducing the risk of nuclear war? What do you plan to do about NATO, OPEC, the CIA, affirmative action, and the monstrous treatment of the Baha’is in Iran? I shall take the liberty of answering for you: You plan to do nothing about them.”…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users contend that personal actions like voting, donating, or purchasing electric vehicles constitute meaningful contributions &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48615965&quot; title=&quot;Er... I got an electric car does that count? Based on $ keeping the old car is cheaper. Also divestment, purchase choices, charity donations, solar install.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48615827&quot; title=&quot;This is close to correct. We should be aware of current events but not become too emotionally involved with them. They are mostly outside of our control, and we need to reserve most of our focus and emotional energy on what is front of us and our loved ones. However, we should still act on behalf of greater causes with the means at our disposal. Some examples... world in crisis - I donate to World Central Kitchen the war in Ukraine - I donate to Come Back Alive fascism in America - I vote for…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616166&quot; title=&quot;Buying electric cars, installing solar, and switching to heat pumps are one of the few things you can materially do to screw the powers that be. The the other one is limiting your family size.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others dismiss these as statistically insignificant or symbolic gestures &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616200&quot; title=&quot;No, it doesn&amp;#39;t. Your contribution is statistically insignificant. It was purely a symbolic gesture.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a sharp disagreement regarding the reliability of media narratives, with some suggesting that the only healthy response is to disengage entirely from news that is often biased or impossible for a layman to verify &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616022&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;We should be aware of current events I have come to the conclusion that there is no way a layman understand the truth about current events. So it is best to not at all be aware of any current events as reported by the media or popular opinion. For example you say &amp;#39;fascism in America&amp;#39;, and I wonder is this guy for real? Fascism? If this was true how are all the people who insult Trump on social media still alive or not locked up? So imagine if you were running a new outlet. All of your readers…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fosterelli.co/developers-dont-understand-cors&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Developers don&amp;#39;t understand CORS (2019)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (fosterelli.co)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48614844&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;370 points · 258 comments · by toilet&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that a lack of understanding regarding Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) leads developers to implement insecure workarounds, citing a Zoom vulnerability where an image-based hack was used to bypass browser security instead of properly configuring origin headers. &lt;a href=&quot;https://fosterelli.co/developers-dont-understand-cors&quot; title=&quot;Title: Developers don&amp;#39;t understand CORS    URL Source: https://fosterelli.co/developers-dont-understand-cors    Markdown Content:  ### Developers don&amp;#39;t understand CORS    July 10, 2019 — Chris Foster    One of the best things about working in full stack consulting is that I get to work with a great number of developers with different skill levels in companies from various sizes and industries. This provides an opportunity to see what universal struggles come up. One that seems common and relevant…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a fundamental confusion regarding CORS, with users debating whether it is a mechanism to restrict requests or merely a way to loosen default browser security &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616086&quot; title=&quot;Even TFA seemingly doesn&amp;#39;t understand CORS. Or at least misreprents it grossly: &amp;gt; The webserver listening in on localhost:19421 should implement a REST API and set a Access-Control-Allow-Origin header with the value https://zoom.us . This will ensure that only Javascript running on the zoom.us domain can talk to the localhost webserver. No, that does not do that. JavaScript from any other website can still talk to localhost:19421 just the same. CORS doesn&amp;#39;t restrict anything, it loosens the…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48615354&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s not just CORS that&amp;#39;s hard to understand. Many (most?) developers don&amp;#39;t really understand the threat model. And even when it&amp;#39;s explained it hard to see why it&amp;#39;s a big deal. Part of this is that backend developers usually have to configure CORS and it&amp;#39;s not an access privilege protection. From the point of view of the backend it doesn&amp;#39;t seem to matter. Bad guys can&amp;#39;t get it. From the point of view of the front-end it&amp;#39;s often seen as a nuisance. The article does a nice job giving a concrete…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that CORS prevents non-idempotent requests via preflight OPTIONS checks &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48617943&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t understand why this is the most upvoted comment. OP is right, and you are wrong. &amp;gt; The requests happen in any case, and you must ensure in your backend that they don&amp;#39;t cause any adverse effects. GET requests will be sent, but they are supposed to be idempotent so if your server is implemented in a sensible way, it cannot cause any adverse effect, and reading the response is all that matters for GET requests. For non-idempotent requests however (the only ones that are supposed to be able…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;, others point out that &amp;#34;simple&amp;#34; requests (like certain POSTs) can still be sent cross-origin without preflighting, potentially causing side effects if the backend does not strictly validate content types &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48617728&quot; title=&quot;My understanding was that &amp;#39;preventing otherwise disallowed HTTP requests&amp;#39; was the entire point of the preflight OPTIONS request, and that CORS will do nothing if the request would otherwise be allowed. For example, a POST request with a Content-Type of &amp;#39;text/json&amp;#39; would not be allowed to be sent to third-party hosts without an OPTIONS preflight, but one with a Content-Type of &amp;#39;multipart/form-data&amp;#39; would be allowed and wouldn&amp;#39;t be stopped by CORS at all, even to third-party hosts. (And, of…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48617847&quot; title=&quot;If your web application specifically parses data based on the Content-Type that it advertises itself to be, then yes, the webapp would hit a parse error. But there are many applications that don&amp;#39;t do that. An attacker might use JavaScript to set a &amp;#39;multipart/form-data&amp;#39; Content-Type (thereby bypassing the otherwise required OPTIONS preflight), but send JSON in the request body. Unless your web application specifically parses the body based on the Content-Type (web servers don&amp;#39;t do this for you),…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, the contradictory nature of the comments serves to prove the article&amp;#39;s premise that the protocol and its threat model are widely misunderstood &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616394&quot; title=&quot;I don&amp;#39;t think you can even say CORS does that. The degree to which CORS is poorly understood (I have read numerous (often contradictory) documentation and I don&amp;#39;t really understand it.) means that you can&amp;#39;t rely on it being implemented properly by an unknown party, If a protocol reaches this level of widespread confusion, I think all bets are off.  Even if one end of a system performs correctly, who&amp;#39;s to say that the other will.   If people adapt their code until it works with another…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616542&quot; title=&quot;I think this is legitimately the least informed HN comment section I&amp;#39;ve ever seen. Entirely proving the author&amp;#39;s point.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616471&quot; title=&quot;Even the HN comments here are a sea of confusion and contradiction. It&amp;#39;s stunning and makes me wonder whether CORS is a bad solution, or if it&amp;#39;s solving a hard problem.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. &lt;a href=&quot;https://david.newgas.net/did-my-old-job-only-exist-because-of-fraud/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Did my old job only exist because of fraud?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (david.newgas.net)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48622867&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;408 points · 181 comments · by advisedwang&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A software engineer reflects on discovering that his former employer, GenieDB, was allegedly used as a vehicle for a multi-million dollar investment fraud scheme orchestrated by venture capitalist Stuart Frost to extract excessive incubator fees. &lt;a href=&quot;https://david.newgas.net/did-my-old-job-only-exist-because-of-fraud/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Did my old job only exist because of fraud? – It&amp;#39;s not about code    URL Source: https://david.newgas.net/did-my-old-job-only-exist-because-of-fraud/    Markdown Content:  Early in my software engineering career, the UK-based startup I worked at, GenieDB, was taken over by a US Venture Capital fund, Frost VP, owned by Stuart Frost. I was functionally the only piece that came to the US. The code was rebuilt, the rest of the team eventually rotated out, even the core strategy was replaced. But…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters highlight that fraudulent billing and &amp;#34;budget burning&amp;#34; are systemic issues in both government and corporate sectors, often driven by the fear that unspent funds will lead to future budget cuts &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623332&quot; title=&quot;I was on a government project where I found out I was being fraudulently billed on my hours. It was towards the end of the year and my manager was trying to use up the budget of the client. Although this is normal in the private sector I told him from the beginning that you can&amp;#39;t do this on a government project. The project was $1M+ which was enough for prison time. He had gone into our billing software and edited my entries - it wasn&amp;#39;t as if he was submitting the fraudulent totals only - he…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623490&quot; title=&quot;That was your mistake. The grant recipient or department has as much incentive to fully spend the money as your consultant boss does to bill it. It&amp;#39;s a implied understanding. Spend the budget or next time people will ask why you need all that money when you didn&amp;#39;t spend it last time. Expensive projects are important projects. Important projects make careers. That is baked in several layers deep. You&amp;#39;d need to report it to a waste and fraud line, ombudsman, or similar. I&amp;#39;m not sure its unusual…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. In the private sector, particularly banking, management frequently creates inefficiencies by firing staff only to re-hire them as expensive contractors to bypass headcount freezes &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623671&quot; title=&quot;As a junior software engineer, I worked at a large UK bank. Senior management routinely seem baffled that they could announce redundancies or hiring freezes, yet technology costs would continue to rise. One pattern I saw repeatedly was a contractor being let go, only to return via a large outsourcing provider. The provider must have added a substantial markup despite supplying the same engineer back to the same team, without having incurred any procurement costs. I once asked a more senior…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48624256&quot; title=&quot;when i worked for an australian bank, one co-worker in a nearby team had been working on the the banks systems as a sysadmin for over a decade. the bank would go through cycles of &amp;#39;we need to reduce our headcount and outsource everything&amp;#39; and then 4 years later &amp;#39;we need to reduce spend on contractors and retain more knowledge and expertise in house&amp;#39;. he&amp;#39;d survived multiple waves of it, switching back and forth between being an employee or a contractor through some external agency, as management…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that employees should blow the whistle on such waste &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623822&quot; title=&quot;Okay… do you not feel culpable at some point? Do you feel no obligation to expose these various individuals fleecing the tax payers? Your boss, the academics, and everyone else who participated or knows and remains silent. Obviously, you are now in the later group. Yes I know it’s not all that rare, BECAUSE people can’t be bothered to blow the whistle.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;, others maintain that workers should focus on their own careers and paychecks rather than the ethical failings of large organizations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623280&quot; title=&quot;Why does any of this actually matter? Why were you shaken? You weren’t committing fraud. You did real work. Now you’re in the US with a family and a career. Happy Father’s Day.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623416&quot; title=&quot;One of the many reasons to never actually care about the work you are doing if it is a for-profit endeavor, and you are not the owner. You are there to collect a paycheck so you can survive. If you want a job that you should care about then work in public service, at a non-profit, or for yourself.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://apertvs.ai/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Apertus – Open Foundation Model for Sovereign AI&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (apertvs.ai)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48622778&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;306 points · 110 comments · by T-A&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Swiss AI Initiative has launched Apertus, a fully open and reproducible foundation model available in 8B and 70B parameters that prioritizes multilingual performance and compliance with the EU AI Act. &lt;a href=&quot;https://apertvs.ai/&quot; title=&quot;Title: Fully Open Foundation Model for Sovereign AI    URL Source: https://apertvs.ai/    Published Time: Fri, 19 Jun 2026 07:33:51 GMT    Markdown Content:  ![Image 1: Apertus](https://apertvs.ai/images/apertvs.svg)    Developed by the [Swiss AI Initiative](https://www.swiss-ai.org/) as a collaborative effort between EPFL, ETH Zurich, and CSCS. Open weights, open data, open science.    [![Image 2: Apertus](https://apertvs.ai/images/apertvs.svg)](https://apertvs.ai/)    ### Fully Open    Training data, code,…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Apertus initiative highlights a growing demand for &amp;#34;sovereign AI&amp;#34; to ensure data security and independence from US-based frontier labs, which some users argue have become unreliable due to political instability and shifting legal standards &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623204&quot; title=&quot;I like the idea, and it has become more pressing that everyone outside the US think about tech sovereignty because the US has become an unsafe place to keep your data, but the impression I get from Apertus is that it moves at the speed of a committee. I have no expectation they&amp;#39;ll deliver a competitive model. At least, not competitive with current models. Maybe competitive with models a year ago (though they haven&amp;#39;t even done that yet, right?).&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623417&quot; title=&quot;The rule of law exists in other countries in a way it does not in the US right now.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48624123&quot; title=&quot;Wow, this is a bit obtuse. It is a commonly accepted &amp;#39;fact&amp;#39; right now, outside the US, that the US is not to be trusted (right now), due to some orange guy, and his mates, manipulating markets, running their mouths, doing all kinds of criminal and/or infantile shit. I&amp;#39;d say there is quite a bit of evidence for this all around.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some participants believe fully open training pipelines are the only way to prevent &amp;#34;sleepwalking into slavery&amp;#34; under proprietary services, others worry that Apertus moves too slowly to remain competitive with existing open-weight models from the US and China &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623204&quot; title=&quot;I like the idea, and it has become more pressing that everyone outside the US think about tech sovereignty because the US has become an unsafe place to keep your data, but the impression I get from Apertus is that it moves at the speed of a committee. I have no expectation they&amp;#39;ll deliver a competitive model. At least, not competitive with current models. Maybe competitive with models a year ago (though they haven&amp;#39;t even done that yet, right?).&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623415&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s good that there is a movement for open LLMs, but it&amp;#39;s not where the battleground is right now . The battleground is local vs service LLMs, and we are losing that battle badly despite all the software being here now and viable, entirely because UX sucks. How many normal people do you know who use &amp;#39;ChatGPT&amp;#39;? A lot, probably. How many even know what &amp;#39;Gemma&amp;#39; is, let alone have downloaded llama.cpp, a GGUF file from Hugginface, and run &amp;#39;llama-server&amp;#39; from a text console with all the correct…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623213&quot; title=&quot;Great to see more fully open LLMs. I think a problem with open-weight models is that while you can improve them, you are not going to create the next generation of LLMs by fine-tuning. We are at the mercy of frontier labs for access to SOTA LLMs. For example, Anthropic recently started requiring identity verification for Claude [0], same for OpenAI [1]. If one day China&amp;#39;s distillation labs stop releasing their LLMs as open-weight, I doubt American labs will continue to release free LLM weights…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. A significant technical debate also exists regarding the sophistication of Chinese labs, with some dismissing them as &amp;#34;distillation labs&amp;#34; while others credit them with pioneering novel architectures and high intelligence-per-parameter densities &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623213&quot; title=&quot;Great to see more fully open LLMs. I think a problem with open-weight models is that while you can improve them, you are not going to create the next generation of LLMs by fine-tuning. We are at the mercy of frontier labs for access to SOTA LLMs. For example, Anthropic recently started requiring identity verification for Claude [0], same for OpenAI [1]. If one day China&amp;#39;s distillation labs stop releasing their LLMs as open-weight, I doubt American labs will continue to release free LLM weights…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623408&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; China&amp;#39;s distillation labs This notion that Chinese labs are merely distilling frontier models is quite an unwarranted slur. Those labs have published WAY more useful research than US labs on RL techniques, novel model architectures, training pipelines, etc. They have also hit intelligence-per-parameter densities that US labs have yet to attain. Apart from that, merely training a model on outputs from another model, off policy and without the logits, doesn’t really work that well. The Chinese…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;8. &lt;a href=&quot;https://vinibrasil.com/when-i-reject-ai-code-even-if-it-works/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;When I reject AI code even if it works&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (vinibrasil.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48614631&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;220 points · 161 comments · by vnbrs&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A software engineer argues for rejecting AI-generated code—even when functional—if it lacks clarity, introduces unnecessary complexity, or exceeds the developer&amp;#39;s own understanding, emphasizing that human guidance remains essential for sustainable and scalable engineering. &lt;a href=&quot;https://vinibrasil.com/when-i-reject-ai-code-even-if-it-works/&quot; title=&quot;Title: When I reject AI code even if it works    URL Source: https://vinibrasil.com/when-i-reject-ai-code-even-if-it-works/    Published Time: 2026-06-20T00:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  With implementation getting faster and faster, the real bottleneck moves to reviewing the volume of code generated by AI. I’m not even talking about your coworkers’ (and their agents’) PRs, but your own `git diff` after your coding agent has finished its job.    Even when I follow good practices – like starting with…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a divide between developers who reject AI code for its tendency to create over-engineered abstractions and &amp;#34;sneaky&amp;#34; errors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48615105&quot; title=&quot;Even using Fable (while it was briefly available), having it refine a plan, and directing it to make only small incremental changes, I still found reasons to reject its first pass at a lot of work. There was a lot of “You’re right to push back” responses. A lot of incidents where it would creat some giant complex set of abstractions to accomplish something that I could find ways to do much more elegantly and in a more maintainable manner. It’s really eye opening to work with these tools on a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48615351&quot; title=&quot;These &amp;#39;You&amp;#39;re right to push back&amp;#39; scenarios are scary for me. I mostly code ML implementations, and some of the errors Claude Code (CC - have only used Opus 4.7) makes are very sneaky, and if you don&amp;#39;t have sufficient experience in the area (I see this with people entering ML and writing their implementations with CC), you wouldn&amp;#39;t know when to question CC and will let errors or future pitfalls silently slip into your code . A recent example was when there was data leakage in a model…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;, and those who argue that AI is already superior to the average &amp;#34;enterprise&amp;#34; programmer &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48615360&quot; title=&quot;Coding agents have been better than the average &amp;#39;enterprise&amp;#39; programmer for a while now and nobody wants to admit it or talk about it. I have never seen an agent output an implementation called FooImpl that&amp;#39;s tens of thousands of LOC in a single file, but I have seen plenty of human code like this. People call coding agents bad because they don&amp;#39;t know the asinine meaningless conventions at their particular company while they themselves write awful abstractions and brittle tightly coupled…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some warn that AI’s agreeable nature is merely a hallucination that masks technical debt &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48615105&quot; title=&quot;Even using Fable (while it was briefly available), having it refine a plan, and directing it to make only small incremental changes, I still found reasons to reject its first pass at a lot of work. There was a lot of “You’re right to push back” responses. A lot of incidents where it would creat some giant complex set of abstractions to accomplish something that I could find ways to do much more elegantly and in a more maintainable manner. It’s really eye opening to work with these tools on a…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48617354&quot; title=&quot;What&amp;#39;s mind-blowing to me is that people see the &amp;#39;you&amp;#39;re right to push back&amp;#39; as anything besides hallucination / self affirmation Dude, the fucking model is great for sure, but there is nothing behind the illusion. It doesn&amp;#39;t know if something is right or wrong - simpler or harder to reason about etc It&amp;#39;s just generating text, in a coherent manner while following rhetoric processes as a solid attempt at logical thinking Why is that so hard for people to grok? Our industry (and society after) is…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that rigorous automated linting and feedback loops can remove the human from the process entirely &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616738&quot; title=&quot;I unterstand the reasons, but I don&amp;#39;t think so. I have experience in software development over 20 years now and still developing software daily. Nowadays it&amp;#39;s nearly 100℅ AI written. It looks good and works. Sure, you have to guide the AI. But this can be done with custom skills, angent files, code quality guards test cases and so on. Maybe the code looks at the end not as I would have written it, maybe something is too complex implemented. But that&amp;#39;s true for large developer teams also. At the…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48615526&quot; title=&quot;If you reject AI code that works then your mindset is still too hands on. Put another way - you still have some loops to work on taking yourself out of. The agent should’ve delivered code that was acceptable as a first pass. Agents respond really well to feedback! They have no ego and they’ll happily improve code if told where and how. But you need to provide the tools that provide that feedback without your involvement - otherwise you can’t scale. All the linting and autoformatting you can put…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, the consensus suggests a shift in the developer&amp;#39;s role toward high-level architecture, though there is deep disagreement over whether this leads to more maintainable systems or a &amp;#34;software bankruptcy&amp;#34; caused by unmanaged complexity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48615625&quot; title=&quot;Coding with AI eventually comes down to two paths, I&amp;#39;ve realized. One is using AI exclusively for everything. The other is not using it at all. There is almost no middle ground. The reason is that as the complexity and depth of the problem increase, the code AI generates increasingly follows enterprise level patterns. The deeper the meaning of what I input, the more AI tends to produce code that goes beyond my own area of expertise. For example, a human expert&amp;#39;s code is very powerful and deep…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48615210&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; There are a lot of workplaces where there isn’t a good mechanism to push back on this and the tech debt just keeps growing. If the &amp;#39;big ball of spaghetti&amp;#39; theory holds, where software companies who can&amp;#39;t manage the debt stumble over themselves as they continue to add to the big ball of spaghetti code, I guess we&amp;#39;ll see a row of companies declaring &amp;#39;software bankruptcy&amp;#39; or something in some/many months, depending on how well these workspaces learn to care slightly more and get better at…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48615686&quot; title=&quot;Own the design and let AI write the code. Spend the extra free time on becoming a better/broader architect.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;9. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620502&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tell HN: Happy Fathers Day&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620502&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;293 points · 45 comments · by consumer451&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Hacker News user celebrates Father&amp;#39;s Day by honoring his uncle, an electrical engineer in Soviet-controlled Poland who fostered his interest in technology by building functional gadgets like a custom siren for his bike. &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620502&quot; title=&quot;My shortened story: due to factors in Soviet controlled Poland, my uncle played my dad role.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;He took me to a quarry to fire Estes-style rocket cars, and all that.. he also managed to steal a Milicja (military police) siren from work, and put it on the back of my banana style bike. As an EE, he made it actually function.&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Thanks to all the hackers who made us who we are.&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights the diverse experiences of fatherhood, with several first-time fathers describing the journey as both immensely challenging and the most rewarding experience of their lives &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48622784&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;m a first time father of an 80 day old. And I can gladly say, these have been the most incredible days of my life. I want to be more ambitious and more active for my kid, in ways I hadn&amp;#39;t thought before. Happy Father&amp;#39;s day to all.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623943&quot; title=&quot;This is my first father&amp;#39;s day as a father. It isn&amp;#39;t easy, I have been struggling immensely (plug: I wrote about it at https://asukawang.com/blog/leap-of-faith ), but now she&amp;#39;s seven months old and it has been a lot better. I look forward to all the things I could do for her. A home-made jukebox with NFC tags on cassettes I once saw on HN really interests me, but I reckon a 3D printer would be necessary or at least very handy and there&amp;#39;s not a lot of room left in my house. Also I prefer a…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48624032&quot; title=&quot;Thank you! Happy father&amp;#39;s day to everyone out there. If you&amp;#39;re not a father and are thinking about it, just jump into it, it&amp;#39;s the most phenomenal and rewarding experience!&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. A practical debate emerged regarding physical health, where one user recommended arch supports to prevent plantar fasciitis caused by carrying children, while another argued for strengthening the arches instead of using insoles &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620659&quot; title=&quot;if i had to tell younger fathers one piece of unsolicited advice: buy arch support for your shoes. Plantar fasciitis seems to creep up on a lot of dudes after they have kids. It&amp;#39;s also the worst. I love to carry my kid but sprinting around while carrying the extra load did a number on the feet. You can largely prevent it just by spending $50 on a proper insole. My kid is my favorite thing in my life. So tiring, so rewarding. And after a year of wincing walking barefoot, I can finally run again.…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48621105&quot; title=&quot;As a father who is suffering from plantar fascitis (brought on by running), I would rather fix the problem by strengthening my arches than mask it by buying inner soles.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. Additionally, some users noted that Father&amp;#39;s Day is not celebrated globally on the same date, leading to a brief tangent on whether any holiday is truly universal &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620656&quot; title=&quot;* to some countries. We don’t all celebrate Father’s Day on the same day and we don’t all celebrate Father’s Day at all. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Father%27s_Day#/media/File:Fat...&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48621367&quot; title=&quot;Outside of Towel Day, I&amp;#39;m not sure there is a universally celebrated holiday.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48622708&quot; title=&quot;New Year&amp;#39;s?&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kevinak.se/blog/who-actually-owns-your-atproto-identity-hint-its-probably-not-you&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Who owns your ATProto identity?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (kevinak.se)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48619140&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;163 points · 145 comments · by kevinak&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because Personal Data Server (PDS) operators hold the signing and rotation keys for users, they have the power to impersonate accounts or lock users out of their decentralized identities across the entire ATProto ecosystem. &lt;a href=&quot;https://kevinak.se/blog/who-actually-owns-your-atproto-identity-hint-its-probably-not-you&quot; title=&quot;Title: Who Actually Owns Your ATProto Identity? Hint: It&amp;#39;s Probably Not You    URL Source: https://kevinak.se/blog/who-actually-owns-your-atproto-identity-hint-its-probably-not-you    Markdown Content:  After writing my previous article about Bluesky&amp;#39;s centralization risks, I got into the weeds on how the PDS (Personal Data Server) works. The more I looked at it, the worse it got. I was originally worried about Bluesky going rogue and deleting accounts or locking people in. It&amp;#39;s actually the least…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the trade-offs between convenience and true ownership in the ATProto ecosystem, with some arguing that self-hosting a Personal Data Server (PDS) is a viable solution for data portability that other protocols lack &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48619530&quot; title=&quot;One of the core features of AT is the ability to move your repo hosting provider (PDS) at any time. This is the &amp;#39;data portability&amp;#39; problem that ActivityPub never solved. Bluesky Social, PBC runs a PDS service (bsky.social) for free, there are a number of free public alternatives, and thousands of users self-host. Self-hosting your own PDS can be done with Raspberry Pi or $5/mo VM and requires very little work. It runs in a Docker container with SQLite. https://github.com/bluesky-social/pds&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. However, skeptics point out that most users prioritize security over decentralization, drawing parallels to how people trust centralized entities like domain registrars or GitHub &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48619536&quot; title=&quot;Who owns your domain name? Hint: it’s probably not you. Your hosting provider could take down your domain, or even steal traffic and direct it to their own IPs&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48619486&quot; title=&quot;Most people don’t worry about it for the same reason they don’t worry about GitHub abusing their GitHub account and are even willing to use “login with GitHub” to access their other accounts. Account takeover by a third party is a bigger risk. If you’re concerned about supply chain risks, there are more important concerns than “what if GitHub itself is a bad actor.” It’s solvable if you’re willing to self-host your PDS. But I’m skeptical of the attempts to make a PDS an “everything account.”…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. While some debate the cultural significance and growth potential of Bluesky, others argue that declining active user metrics suggest the protocol has yet to solve its retention issues &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48619306&quot; title=&quot;Probably doesn&amp;#39;t matter for the &amp;#39;40M+ users&amp;#39;, most of them have churned at this point and growth is negative. This is good critique for the next iteration of open social protocols, but fundamentally atproto did not fail because of technical reasons. The next iteration should make privacy the default and core to protocol, and be very mindful of how the leadership / social dynamics played out.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48619578&quot; title=&quot;Bluesky / AT is the most successful open social network in history and the only one to become culturally significant. It has been adopted by presidents, celebrities, journalists, and mainstream users. Bluesky has ~50M registered users and has sustained ~5M monthly active users for long while. There&amp;#39;s no reason to believe it will fall substantially below this level. It is also in the process of adding (decentralized) subcommunities, which I expect to be really cool and have a large impact on…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620034&quot; title=&quot;&amp;#39;Registered users&amp;#39; is a meaningless statistic. Daily active users has consistently declined.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620128&quot; title=&quot;I&amp;#39;d be the last person to downplay the fact that the Bluesky app has a serious retention problem. But it has &amp;#39;broken through&amp;#39; in an incredible way and DAUs/MAUs are quite stable. Registered users is not at all meaningless. Bluesky has those user&amp;#39;s email addresses, the mobile app is still installed on many of their devices, they have accounts, and they can potentially be reactivated. For example, if Bluesky announced a feature exciting enough, like subcommunities, it could email those 50M users…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;11. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lcamtuf.substack.com/p/the-100000-whys-of-ai&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The 100k whys of AI&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (lcamtuf.substack.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616017&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;178 points · 106 comments · by surprisetalk&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that AI-generated content is distinguishable from human work not by individual errors, but by the repetitive, quasi-deterministic patterns and &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; produced when multiple users receive nearly identical outputs from similar prompts. &lt;a href=&quot;https://lcamtuf.substack.com/p/the-100000-whys-of-ai&quot; title=&quot;Title: The 100,000 whys of AI    URL Source: https://lcamtuf.substack.com/p/the-100000-whys-of-ai    Published Time: 2026-06-21T05:38:44+00:00    Markdown Content:  One of the most painful arguments I keep having with fellow techies is the question of whether you can distinguish between human-written and AI-generated text.    Their skepticism is rooted in reason: at their core, LLMs are state-of-the-art statistical models of how humans talk. If so, the output from the model should be _almost by…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights a consensus that LLM outputs suffer from extreme homogeneity, often converging into a &amp;#34;predictable blob&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;slop&amp;#34; because they lack the diverse life experiences and moods of human creators &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616201&quot; title=&quot;A nice illustration of the homogeneity of LLM responses. Another way to describe this effect would be… If you ask humans to write 1,000 books, you&amp;#39;re asking 1,000 different humans with different experiences and different skills and different moods (etc.) to write those books. But if you ask LLMs to write 1,000 books, you&amp;#39;re probably only talking to 3 or 5 different models, tops. And they&amp;#39;ve all trained on the same or similar data, and are trained to respond in very similar ways. The LLMs don&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616221&quot; title=&quot;When you generate one or two blog posts with LLM they look pretty good. And you will be impressed with that one clever bit it adds that you didn&amp;#39;t even ask for. But then you generate 50 of them and they all converge into the same pattern. It&amp;#39;s hard to prove that an article is AI generated but they are instantly recognizable. An aside, I usually take my written blog posts through a pass on Notebooklm to generate a podcast like discussion about it. It used to be a good way to extract some…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616593&quot; title=&quot;Classic self selection effect though - if you’re resorting to LLM writing you’re almost certainly skewing lazy enough to not even bother trying to add perturbations strong enough to make the response deviate from the uniformity of the slop.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users argue this &amp;#34;smell&amp;#34; is instantly recognizable through pattern recognition, others contend that the perceived lack of originality is a result of &amp;#34;lazy&amp;#34; prompting rather than an inherent limitation of the technology &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616221&quot; title=&quot;When you generate one or two blog posts with LLM they look pretty good. And you will be impressed with that one clever bit it adds that you didn&amp;#39;t even ask for. But then you generate 50 of them and they all converge into the same pattern. It&amp;#39;s hard to prove that an article is AI generated but they are instantly recognizable. An aside, I usually take my written blog posts through a pass on Notebooklm to generate a podcast like discussion about it. It used to be a good way to extract some…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616457&quot; title=&quot;Also since those are lazy, you are also asking always in the same manner. How homogeneous were the prompts that generated those covers? People are making cookies with cookie cutter number 5 and other people wonder how come they are all the same.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616508&quot; title=&quot;On HN many comments under many threads are about whether the submission was written by AI. You could say I have noticed a pattern in Hacker News comments! In these comments there&amp;#39;s a common pattern where some users argue that they do not agree that the submission was LLM written and they often focus on specific details to refute it (e.g em-dashes) and some users see the overall pattern clearly that it&amp;#39;s totally obvious. For me it&amp;#39;s a kind of smell, it&amp;#39;s off putting and it&amp;#39;s obvious. The article…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Proponents of the latter view suggest that complex, multi-step workflows and randomized feature steering can force models to generate unique combinations that deviate from their standard training data &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616878&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; A nice illustration of the homogeneity of LLM responses. [...] And they&amp;#39;ve all trained on the same or similar data, and are trained to respond in very similar ways. I mostly agree, but this is a very simplified explanation. The models are indeed trained to respond in similar ways, for &amp;#39;basic&amp;#39; prompts. And that&amp;#39;s as much a feature as it is a bug. In other words, the bug becomes apparent only if you give 100+ basic prompts. But giving it 100+ basic prompts and expecting originality is a silly…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616960&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; 1000 variants of existing art. This is very naive. I can almost guarantee that some combinations of 20 * 50 features will hit on something that has never been written before in that specific combination . And if that&amp;#39;s still not enough, increase the number of features. Add more randomness, add more steering, add random steering in random chapters, change it up, and so on.&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cleantechnica.com/2026/06/16/shipping-freight-energy-fossil-cargo/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Fossil Fuels Are 40% of Freight Shipping Tonnage, but Half Its Fuel Use&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (cleantechnica.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48619394&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;148 points · 133 comments · by choult&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The maritime energy transition is simplified by the fact that fossil fuel cargo, which accounts for 40% of shipping tonnage and half of its fuel use, will largely disappear as global demand for coal, oil, and gas declines. &lt;a href=&quot;https://cleantechnica.com/2026/06/16/shipping-freight-energy-fossil-cargo/&quot; title=&quot;Fossil Fuels Are 40% Of Freight Shipping Tonnage, But Half Its Fuel Use - CleanTechnica    Fossil fuels are about 40% of maritime tonnage but roughly half of freight energy, which changes the shipping fuel transition.    [Skip to content](#main)    [![CleanTechnica](https://cleantechnica.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/CleanTechnica_logo_crop.webp)](https://cleantechnica.com/)    * [Clean Energy](https://cleantechnica.com)    + [Solar Energy](https://cleantechnica.com/category/clean-power/solar-energy/)  …&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights that fossil fuels represent a disproportionate share of maritime shipping work, meaning their decline would significantly reduce global fuel consumption &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48619832&quot; title=&quot;From the fucking article: Fossil fuel cargoes travel long distances in very large flows, so their decline removes more than a proportional share of cargo mass. It removes a larger share of the ocean work and the fuel burned to do that work. And if I can get on my soapbox. This same problem (carrying fuel to feed the transportation unit) is well studied in medieval England because it was one of the main determinants of where cities and castles were placed (albeit unknowingly at the time). And we…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue maritime shipping is already highly efficient compared to road transport &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620260&quot; title=&quot;The top graph makes it seem much more dramatic than it is. Maritime shipping is very efficient, and consists of a very small fraction of overall petroleum usage. Road transportation uses about 20x as much fuel as ocean shipping, planes use about 2x as much, and trains about the same amount. The typical rule of thumb is that about 40% of the energy in a barrel of petroleum is lost before it goes into your gas tank.   And the two big factors are the energy required to do the refining and…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;, others emphasize that EVs are fundamentally more efficient because electric motors convert 90% of energy into motion compared to just 30% for internal combustion engines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620720&quot; title=&quot;In an EV about 90% of the energy used is converted into motion. About 10% goes to heat. [1][3] In an ICE engine about 30% of the energy becomes motion. About 70% is heat.[2] In other words electric motors are about 3 times more efficient than ICE. [1] an interesting side effect of this is that in cold climates you can&amp;#39;t just harvest waste heat to heat the cabin (or batteries. ) So you end up using some battery energy if you need heat. [2] ICE motors vary in effeciency a lot. 20-30% is typical.…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620814&quot; title=&quot;The cost of EV energy (to the driver) is about half that of the cost of gas energy. And that&amp;#39;s if you buy electricity at charging stations [1]. If you charge at home it gets less. If you have solar at home it approaches zero. Yes, the cost of the car itself is a factor, but even there prices are dropping all the time. &amp;gt;&amp;gt; when you can only take 10% as much fuel effeciency makes all the difference when we discuss % of fuel. 90% of 100 mj is the same as 30% of 300 mj. So already the &amp;#39;fuel&amp;#39; can be…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Debates persist regarding the practical costs of EV ownership, with disagreements over whether charging is consistently cheaper than gasoline &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620814&quot; title=&quot;The cost of EV energy (to the driver) is about half that of the cost of gas energy. And that&amp;#39;s if you buy electricity at charging stations [1]. If you charge at home it gets less. If you have solar at home it approaches zero. Yes, the cost of the car itself is a factor, but even there prices are dropping all the time. &amp;gt;&amp;gt; when you can only take 10% as much fuel effeciency makes all the difference when we discuss % of fuel. 90% of 100 mj is the same as 30% of 300 mj. So already the &amp;#39;fuel&amp;#39; can be…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48621716&quot; title=&quot;Before the Iran war, I did a back of the envelope calculation for the price of gas of your average ICE for a certain fixed range vs. the price of electricity an average EV uses for the same range. This was under the assumption that you buy electricity at a random charging station that you don&amp;#39;t have a contract with. Based on these average values I used, EVs fared slightly worse. This was not factoring in costs of purchase or repairs etc. And all averages were taken off the internet so…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt; and whether EVs are suitable for unpredictable, rugged environments &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48622002&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt;It&amp;#39;s an amazing PR and marketing coup to make it the other way around and presented as something for &amp;#39;liberal weaklings&amp;#39; etc. If there is such a marketing, then people relate to it because EVs are not suited for handling unpredictable situation. You got stuck in a ditch in the middle of nowhere at night, you loss all of your battery getting out of it, and now you are stuck. So you can&amp;#39;t take it to unforgiving places. EVs are great for boring commute that is it. I don&amp;#39;t see it changing any time…&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;13. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/06/fda-advisors-unanimously-vote-to-approve-modernas-mrna-after-agency-drama/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;FDA advisors unanimously vote to approve Moderna&amp;#39;s mRNA after agency drama&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (arstechnica.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48622788&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;162 points · 86 comments · by worik&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FDA advisors unanimously voted to support Moderna’s seasonal mRNA flu vaccine, reversing a previous attempt by a Trump appointee to block its review. Trial data showed the shot is significantly more effective than standard vaccines, with a final FDA approval decision expected by August. &lt;a href=&quot;https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/06/fda-advisors-unanimously-vote-to-approve-modernas-mrna-after-agency-drama/&quot; title=&quot;Title: FDA advisors unanimously vote to approve Moderna&amp;#39;s mRNA after agency drama    URL Source: https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/06/fda-advisors-unanimously-vote-to-approve-modernas-mrna-after-agency-drama/    Published Time: 2026-06-18T22:08:59+00:00    Markdown Content:  [Skip to content](https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/06/fda-advisors-unanimously-vote-to-approve-modernas-mrna-after-agency-drama/#main)    Full support    In February, a Trump official refused to review the vaccine.    Independent…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion centers on the perceived subversion of scientific merit at the FDA, with critics arguing that leadership has been compromised by political sycophancy and &amp;#34;celebrity&amp;#34; status &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48622952&quot; title=&quot;The subversion of scientific expertise to replace it with podcasters and political sycophants is one of the biggest disasters of the current years. The very concept of merit has been destroyed and replaced with judgement calls on celebrity (necessary for leadership role) and subservience to the political whims of the last 15 minutes (and you had better switch in the next 15 minutes or you&amp;#39;re out).&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623118&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; The subversion of scientific expertise to replace it with podcasters and political sycophants &amp;gt; The very concept of merit has been destroyed ... It&amp;#39;s the subversion of truth. I think that way of saying it is more accurate, addresses the consequences, and is less occluded by jargon: People care about truth; &amp;#39;scientific expertise&amp;#39; may seem esoteric to most people. I think HN is frequently part of that process: Merit - expertise, actual trials and evidence - is replaced both by sensational…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. A sharp divide exists regarding Vinay Prasad: some label him a &amp;#34;fraud&amp;#34; and a &amp;#34;science denier&amp;#34; whose arbitrary decisions have caused significant harm &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623154&quot; title=&quot;How is discussion on HN different from the leadership levels at FDA? Very different. Decisions with enormous health implications, enormous financial implications, are made at FDA. At HN, most people are here to learn, here to understand more. Vinay Prasad is a fraud, completely unfit for the leadership role he was placed into, making baffling and arbitrary decisions on his own, overturning those with far more experience, knowledge and expertise. If a HN comment gets things wrong, a few people…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48624002&quot; title=&quot;How much death and suffering does this guy have on his conscience? I’m so curious how someone goes from being a professor to a science denier? I simply can’t imagine that journey.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623357&quot; title=&quot;That is a good question, and I&amp;#39;m sure many of the people at UCSF are asking similar questions. However, his sort of misconduct is not the type that would usually violate tenure protections. Beyond the minor CV fibbing, without some evidence that he actually, say, solicited a bribe from Moderna, it&amp;#39;s unlikely that he can face any sort of official sanction. The fraud is in his supposed thrust towards better scientific rigor when he is so sloppy with major decisions of life and death. Just as the…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;, while others defend him as a &amp;#34;100% data driven&amp;#34; researcher who correctly challenged Moderna for using weak comparison groups in their trials &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48625451&quot; title=&quot;It&amp;#39;s really weird how many in HN such as you don&amp;#39;t like Vinay Prasad. He is 100% data driven. He has no ideology behind any of his beliefs or decisions, it&amp;#39;s all 100% data driven. He should be worshipped by HN but instead he is vilified because many people on HN are the ones motivated by ideology or politics. The decision to block Moderna&amp;#39;s application was simple, they were comparing their results against a lower-dosage flu shot which no one in that age range (65+) takes. Moderna agreed to add…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. This conflict reflects a broader debate over the erosion of truth and the government&amp;#39;s handling of public health, which some attribute to &amp;#34;illiberal&amp;#34; federal decisions during the pandemic and others to a manufactured &amp;#34;hysteria&amp;#34; fueled by media and a lack of empathy &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623510&quot; title=&quot;One thing that&amp;#39;s particularly frustrating about all this is that any conversation with the growing contingency of distrustful people has been made very difficult by what I would call poor, avoidable, and illiberal decisions made by the federal government during COVID. (TBF, decisions during a crisis are always hard.) Lab leak theory was dismissed and actively suppressed. Inflated claims were made a priori about absolute vaccine efficacy that any responsible researcher who have not made.…&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623980&quot; title=&quot;Having lived through it myself, I found the government’s actions extremely mild when compared to something like what ICE has been up to. Zero people were directly killed by authorities because of Covid noncompliance. From my perspective, it’s hysteria borne out of the difference in requirements for urban health policy vs. rural health policy, and the fact that rural people quite often travel through urban areas (e.g. airports). Talk to anyone from Wyoming and ask what Covid was like during the…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;14. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hawksley.dev/blog/json-ld-explained-for-personal-websites/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;JSON-LD explained for personal websites&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (hawksley.dev)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48621517&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;191 points · 56 comments · by ethanhawksley&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This guide explains how to use JSON-LD structured data on personal websites to improve search engine visibility, link previews, and crawler comprehension through specific Schema.org nodes like Person, WebSite, and BlogPosting. &lt;a href=&quot;https://hawksley.dev/blog/json-ld-explained-for-personal-websites/&quot; title=&quot;Title: JSON-LD Explained for Personal Websites    URL Source: https://hawksley.dev/blog/json-ld-explained-for-personal-websites/    Published Time: 2026-06-21T00:00:00.000Z    Markdown Content:  JSON-LD, also known as JSON Linked Data, is a format for adding structured data to webpages. It can aid web crawlers in understanding the semantic structure of your site, qualifying you for richer link previews, and even potentially improving your search ranking.    It’s been 4 months since my first post where I…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commenters are increasingly skeptical of JSON-LD, arguing that providing structured data merely trains LLMs to summarize content, which de-prioritizes original websites in search results &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48622373&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; It can aid web crawlers in understanding the semantic structure of your site, qualifying you for richer link previews, and even potentially improving your search ranking. This is fighting the last war, to stretch a metaphor. As far as I and my WWW site are concerned, Google has nowadays switched to giving people lengthy LLM-generated versions of my stuff, with errors, above pointing people to my actual stuff.  &amp;#39;Breadcrumbs&amp;#39; and getting a pretty display name instead of the domain name, don&amp;#39;t…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48622647&quot; title=&quot;Yep. For years we loaded up web sites with &amp;#39;microdata&amp;#39; tags and attributes in the hope that they would drive traffic. All it did was train Google&amp;#39;s AI so people would never leave Google.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48622791&quot; title=&quot;I want people to know about my website but if I could I would make search engines and LLMs burst into flames like I was Captain Kirk explaining love to them.&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;. While some suggest that better indexing is necessary to influence future AI models and secure citations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48622704&quot; title=&quot;Considering that LLMs will give increasingly better sources for their stuff you still want to make it easy for Google to index your stuff. Also keep in mind if your site is better indexed by crawlers you can literally influence future LLMs&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48622868&quot; title=&quot;Yes, of course you want people to know about your website. Just saying if your website is regarded as useful/original enough by Google to cite as a source.. people will visit your website to check sources. Might be a small amount of people but still. At this point complaining about the current/future state of search is just gonna make you into a grumpy old man. As always, accept the situation since you can not do anything to change it... and adapt&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;, others criticize the redundancy of the format, questioning why developers must re-express semantic meaning in JSON when HTML-integrated alternatives like Microdata and RDFa already exist &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48621896&quot; title=&quot;We have semantic HTML, but for some weird reason we need to yet again re-express the semantic meaning of our website in bespoke weird JSON in a script tag that the browser won&amp;#39;t process.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48621820&quot; title=&quot;A bit disappointing that (IIUC) for the common parsers you have to say everything twice, in HTML and in the accompanying JSON-LD form even though RDFa exists for the exact purpose of letting you point at the values already present in your markup. (Admittedly RDFa is perhaps too flexible for its own good when you just want to mark up some stuff, but if you’re writing a full parser anyway dealing with a bit of excessive cleverness in the format should not be too bad.)&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48621976&quot; title=&quot;And then there is https://schema.org/ It&amp;#39;s the item* attributes, e.g.: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Reference/... Also Dublin Core in tags.  Why do they keep adding conflicting meta data formats to HTML!?!&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Despite this frustration, JSON-LD remains the industry default for critical SEO tasks like e-commerce visibility &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48622359&quot; title=&quot;Microdata is also a thing, and if I&amp;#39;m not mistaken supports the same vocabulary as JSON-LD (schema.org is a good resource). That said, JSON-LD has the default for a while now, much like how we largely abandoned REST for RPC. I&amp;#39;m not actually sure if microdata is still supported by all the important parsers today, I&amp;#39;ve defaulted to using LD for any site I&amp;#39;ve built for clients, especially ecommerce sites where I want Google Search exposure. Edit: its worth noting the comparison with semantic…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;15. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.marble.onl/posts/cancel_claude.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;There is minimal downside to switching to open models&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (marble.onl)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48622518&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;145 points · 95 comments · by amarble&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The author argues that switching from proprietary AI to open models now carries minimal professional risk, as the performance gap has narrowed and open-source alternatives offer a viable solution to increasing privacy concerns and restrictive verification requirements. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.marble.onl/posts/cancel_claude.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: cancel_claude    URL Source: https://www.marble.onl/posts/cancel_claude.html    Published Time: Sun, 21 Jun 2026 20:55:38 GMT    Markdown Content:  ## There is minimal downside to switching to open models    Andrew Marble    [marble.onl](https://marble.onl/)    andrew@willows.ai    June 21, 2026    There was a time not too long ago when using Linux entailed some professional risk[1](https://www.marble.onl/posts/cancel_claude.html#fn1). First there was compatibility: you may not have been able to render a…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Users argue that open-weight models are now viable alternatives because they match the performance of proprietary models from only a few months ago, which were considered groundbreaking at the time &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48624096&quot; title=&quot;I think it&amp;#39;s interesting that people write off open weight models because they&amp;#39;re &amp;#39;a few months behind&amp;#39; proprietary models. I know LLMs move at the speed of light (especially these past few quarters), but if Opus and GPT &amp;#39;a few months ago&amp;#39; were really like open weight models, then there&amp;#39;s really no reason to not switch, especially for those who were using these models a few months ago. Your codebase didn&amp;#39;t change, so use the open weight model. Don&amp;#39;t move the goalposts.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48624496&quot; title=&quot;Every new proprietary model is &amp;#39;groundbreaking&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;look, it just solved task X that no other model could solve,&amp;#39; only to be referred to as &amp;#39;that crappy previous-generation model&amp;#39; a month later. So yeah, I&amp;#39;m totally fine using Kimi-2.7, GLM-5.2 or Deepseek-v4. I think we&amp;#39;ve already hit the ceiling and most improvements now seem to be from harness improvements and slightly better RL to improve reasoning/tool calling.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;. While some emphasize the privacy and sovereignty benefits of local inference to avoid &amp;#34;model degradation&amp;#34; or geopolitical export controls &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48625126&quot; title=&quot;There&amp;#39;s at least the possibility that they intentionally degrade the models as time passes. We can&amp;#39;t really verify that we&amp;#39;re getting what we&amp;#39;re paying for all of the time. All the more reason to invest in local inference.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48625716&quot; title=&quot;&amp;gt; Open models are served via various means, some by the companies that released them and some by third parties like OpenRouter. Unfortunately, both of these  routes are dodgier in terms of privacy and data sharing, and I would not feel the same comfort sending API calls containing client or confidential data to them. That&amp;#39;s why I&amp;#39;m using eurouter.ai with the following routing rule for all my requests: {      &amp;#39;model&amp;#39;: &amp;#39;glm-5.2&amp;#39;,      &amp;#39;models&amp;#39;: [        &amp;#39;deepseek-v4-pro&amp;#39;,        &amp;#39;deepseek-v4-flash&amp;#39;   …&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48625272&quot; title=&quot;Current prices are insane but at this point I&amp;#39;m starting to feel like it&amp;#39;s an existential issue. I&amp;#39;m not a US citizen. At any point the USA could come up with some arbitrary export controls. Not having a computer capable of running at least Qwen is starting to actually seem risky to me. At least it&amp;#39;s going to be usable as a very high end gaming PC.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that the high cost of hardware makes local hosting a poor investment compared to cheap API access &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48625238&quot; title=&quot;At current prices, and considering these OS Models&amp;#39; performance, investing in local inference sounds like a bad idea.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48624965&quot; title=&quot;Sure. But OpenAI is the same price. Why would I pay $18/month for z.ai when OpenAI is $20/month?&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623952&quot; title=&quot;yeah, on a 96GB Mac Studio and Gemma+Qwen, it&amp;#39;s definitely fully doable. fully doable but not really for coding on 16GB. but svelter models and cheaper (eventually) hardware are coming!&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. A recurring frustration with proprietary tools is the presence of restrictive guardrails, leading some to seek open models that &amp;#34;just answer the fucking question&amp;#34; without ego-stroking or elaborate prompting &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48624897&quot; title=&quot;I know open models have gotten quite good in many tasks such as coding or composition, but are there any that can access the internet and retrieve data like ChatGPT, Claude, etc can? I do have to admit I have recently begun wishing I could pay five dollars a month for a &amp;#39;just answer the fucking question&amp;#39; plan that would give me results without the guardrails and without the constant simpering and ego-stroking. I keep finding myself going a quick evaluation of &amp;#39;is it faster for me to skim search…&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;16. &lt;a href=&quot;https://martinfowler.com/articles/reliable-llm-bayer.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Building reliable agentic AI systems&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (martinfowler.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48615680&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;188 points · 47 comments · by sarangk90&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bayer developed PRINCE, an agentic AI system that uses multi-agent orchestration and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to transform complex preclinical drug discovery data into a searchable conversational platform, emphasizing reliability through rigorous &amp;#34;context engineering,&amp;#34; state persistence, and automated reflection loops. &lt;a href=&quot;https://martinfowler.com/articles/reliable-llm-bayer.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Building Reliable Agentic AI Systems    URL Source: https://martinfowler.com/articles/reliable-llm-bayer.html    Published Time: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 12:33:35 GMT    Markdown Content:  Preclinical drug discovery is inherently complex and data-intensive. Researchers face the significant challenge of efficiently accessing and analyzing vast volumes of information generated during this critical phase. Traditional keyword-based search methods, often reliant on rigid Boolean logic, frequently fall short…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The consensus among practitioners is that building reliable agents is primarily a data engineering challenge, with one developer noting that 99% of the effort is spent cleaning and centralizing data into a queryable database rather than tuning the agent itself &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616187&quot; title=&quot;The most important part is the database that the agent can see and how clean the data is. I pitched a custom enterprise agent to a client thinking it would be maybe 50/50 time on data vs agent tuning, but it&amp;#39;s more like 99/1. The alignment process goes very quickly once you have all the fish in exactly one barrel. I think pulling data dynamically from the source systems is where this turns into a game of whack-a-mole. The problem with dynamic fetch is that you don&amp;#39;t get any kind of persistent…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that modern large context windows allow models to organize data hierarchies dynamically &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48617815&quot; title=&quot;You can almost tell the &amp;#39;era&amp;#39; that a solution was built in these days since things are changing so fast. Mid-2026, we have very large context windows, and much smarter models than we did in 2024 when this was built. If I were to tackle this today I&amp;#39;d ask a current frontier model to work through the source data and design a hierarchy that would give it the ability to sift through the content itself by drilling down as it sees fit, and I expect it would nail that.&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;, others contend that complex multi-agent architectures often lack rigorous evaluation and may be &amp;#34;pontificating beyond their worth&amp;#34; &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616059&quot; title=&quot;These vast multi-agentic systems with roles like &amp;#39;Researcher&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;Writer&amp;#39; (with a review loop), &amp;#39;Reflection agent&amp;#39;, seem to ~feel~ mostly right but lack evals as to the merit of agent decomposition. So it forms a satisfying enough flowchart but I see no evidence these authors actually tried other approaches or agent roles. And let&amp;#39;s be honest: an agent is just a system prompt and output contracts, and these rich architectures seem to be pontificating beyond their worth. It all feels a bit vibe-y.&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48618799&quot; title=&quot;It would not, and you would know that if you actually evaluated the results.&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. Addressing concerns over reliability in sensitive fields like medicine, the author clarifies that systems must prioritize &amp;#34;human-in-the-loop&amp;#34; verification and verbatim citations to mitigate the inherent risk of LLM hallucinations &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48619392&quot; title=&quot;Author here. A couple of things worth clarifying. The 3.1/5.0 score in the Frontiers paper is a user satisfaction rating on feature completeness. Researchers were asked how well the system met all of their needs, including features that simply didn&amp;#39;t exist yet at that point. It&amp;#39;s a product maturity signal, not an accuracy or reliability number. The paper is also about a year old and the system has moved on significantly since. On hallucinations, I&amp;#39;d push back on the framing a bit. The fact that…&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48618645&quot; title=&quot;Most important piece of information is in the linked Frontiers article: However, the overall capability of the chatbot to fully meet user needs received a lower average score (3.1/5.0), highlighting the need for further improvements. Also there is still the problem of hallucinations, as we see in the „Evaluation“ paragraph: Live traffic evaluations are essential for monitoring system behavior, identifying potential issues like hallucinations in production, and understanding performance on…&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;17. &lt;a href=&quot;https://norvig.com/lispy.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;(How to Write a (Lisp) Interpreter (In Python)) (2010)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (norvig.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48619831&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;176 points · 57 comments · by tosh&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Peter Norvig demonstrates how to build a concise Scheme interpreter in Python, explaining the fundamental processes of parsing, execution, and lexical scoping through a 117-line program called Lispy. &lt;a href=&quot;https://norvig.com/lispy.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: (How to Write a (Lisp) Interpreter (in Python))    URL Source: https://norvig.com/lispy.html    Markdown Content:  This page has two purposes: to describe how to implement computer language interpreters in general, and in particular to build an interpreter for most of the [_Scheme_](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scheme_(programming_language)) dialect of Lisp using [Python 3](http://python.org/) as the implementation language. I call my language and interpreter _Lispy_…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Implementing a Lisp or Forth interpreter is widely considered a transformative and illuminating experience for programmers &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48619922&quot; title=&quot;I can&amp;#39;t recommend highly enough to implement a simple lisp (or a forth). Illuminating experience and it will also help you see (among many other things) the parentheses in a different light.&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;. While some argue that such educational resources have aged poorly in the era of AI, others maintain that the simplicity of s-expression syntax remains a practical choice for implementing scripting engines &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620087&quot; title=&quot;First day of paradigms course in the 2000s and prof says &amp;#39;if your opinion of Scheme is too many parentheses, then you&amp;#39;re an idiot.&amp;#39; Needless to say that was my opinion and every day I think, more and more, how right he was. (later I did make some gui apps that included scripting and chose s-expr syntax because of how simple it is to implement it)&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620556&quot; title=&quot;Man these kind of resources have aged really bad in the age of AI.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;. Much of the discussion focuses on the notorious parentheses, with users noting that initial skepticism often fades once the structural elegance is understood, though some still find the visual density of brackets difficult to manage compared to C-style braces &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620087&quot; title=&quot;First day of paradigms course in the 2000s and prof says &amp;#39;if your opinion of Scheme is too many parentheses, then you&amp;#39;re an idiot.&amp;#39; Needless to say that was my opinion and every day I think, more and more, how right he was. (later I did make some gui apps that included scripting and chose s-expr syntax because of how simple it is to implement it)&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620146&quot; title=&quot;main problem isn&amp;#39;t brackets themselves - it&amp;#39;s that they&amp;#39;re too on the right had brackets been displayed as curly braces in C - everything would look much more manageable&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;18. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alexkritchevsky.com/2026/05/25/everything-is-logarithms.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Everything is logarithms&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (alexkritchevsky.com)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48622626&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;179 points · 38 comments · by E-Reverance&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The article explores the &amp;#34;baseless logarithm&amp;#34; as a fundamental algebraic object, arguing that logarithms, vectors, dimensions, and derivatives are all manifestations of the same covariant structure used to translate between multiplicative and additive representations of mathematical concepts. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alexkritchevsky.com/2026/05/25/everything-is-logarithms.html&quot; title=&quot;Title: Everything Is Logarithms    URL Source: https://alexkritchevsky.com/2026/05/25/everything-is-logarithms.html    Published Time: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 05:32:19 GMT    Markdown Content:  alexkritchevsky   a blog  home  about  atom.xml          all articles:  math  tech          reading list  darken  Everything Is Logarithms  May 25, 2026        Some connections between things, which I have not seen elsewhere. Maybe they mean something?    1. The Baseless Logarithm    Normally one writes a logarithm with a base, log  b  	​    (x),…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The discussion highlights the versatility of logarithms, ranging from their historical use as a &amp;#34;magic wormhole&amp;#34; for simplifying complex manual calculations to their modern interpretation as abstract mathematical objects like torsors &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623546&quot; title=&quot;Logs are awesome. I started a math textbook from the 1920&amp;#39;s a while ago, and all the calculations relied on tabulated logs, where you would convert the number to a log in a table to reduce the operation&amp;#39;s degree, then convert back to the ordinary representation. This would reduce operations like finding cubed roots to division, would could be converted to log-log to be further reduced to subtraction before you would restore to ordinary notation. It feels like you&amp;#39;re using a magic wormhole or…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48625494&quot; title=&quot;The baseless log here is just a torsor [0]! Lots of things are torsors: position, currency values, calendar dates etc. the vales themselves are arbitrary, and translating/scaling them by some value doesn&amp;#39;t make a functional difference. Torsors let us talk about these things without needing to make such an arbitrary choice a priori. In the case of baseless logs, the underlying set is &amp;#39;information units&amp;#39;, i.e. log 2 is bits, log e is nats, log 10 is digits, etc. The conversion factors give us the…&quot;&gt;[5]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623428&quot; title=&quot;The first section details how the author thinks of &amp;#39;log N&amp;#39; with no base as an abstract object rather than a number. Or what are you referring to?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;. While some users emphasize that logarithms are &amp;#34;laughably simple&amp;#34; once the relationship between bases and powers is internalized, others argue for more formal rigor, suggesting the essay lacks a necessary type system to clarify units and references &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623317&quot; title=&quot;This essay needs a type system. Every time it says “log” it should say: log of what, into what? It’s like audio where people say &amp;#39;dB&amp;#39; as if it answers the next question. Relative to what, measured how, and weighted for whom? Author should brush up on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie_theory&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48623397&quot; title=&quot;That&amp;#39;s a lot of ways to think about logarithms. Logarithms are laughably simple once you&amp;#39;ve fully internalized the meaning of the log function; it simply answers the question: &amp;#39;To what power must I raise the base to get the argument?&amp;#39; This is why the output tapers out as you increase the argument; because even if you increase the argument exponentially, you only need a fixed increment in the power to reach that number... So if you increase the argument only by a fixed amount (linearly) instead…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;. A specific point of confusion regarding negative decibels in audio was clarified as being relative to a system&amp;#39;s maximum output capacity &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48624819&quot; title=&quot;I still don&amp;#39;t understand why audio dB are negative. That&amp;#39;s relative to what? What happens at 0dB?&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48624977&quot; title=&quot;0db is usually defined as the loudest sound that the audio system can produce.  Hence, everything else must be negative.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;19. &lt;a href=&quot;https://brandur.org/minimum-viable-unit&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The minimum viable unit of saleable software&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (brandur.org)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620342&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;148 points · 56 comments · by brandur&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Despite the rise of AI-assisted coding, software remains a viable business if its complexity and reasonable pricing create a &amp;#34;zone of viability&amp;#34; where buying is more cost-effective than the labor required to build and maintain a custom LLM-generated alternative. &lt;a href=&quot;https://brandur.org/minimum-viable-unit&quot; title=&quot;Title: The Minimum Viable Unit of Saleable Software    URL Source: https://brandur.org/minimum-viable-unit    Published Time: Fri, 19 Jun 2026 16:45:02 GMT    Markdown Content:  Last week I wrote about [leaving Stainless](https://brandur.org/nanoglyphs/051-that-was-fast) and my intention to work on building my side project [River](https://riverqueue.com/) into a small, sustainable business. When I sent that letter, a few people asked about my thought process in trying to run a software company in the…&quot;&gt;[src]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While AI has lowered the cost of generating code, commenters argue that building &amp;#34;saleable&amp;#34; software remains difficult due to the high effort required for iteration, maintenance, and refining specifications through actual use &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48621252&quot; title=&quot;I like that you point out that the cost to build software is still not 0. And in my expirence it’s further from 0 than I would expect.  I often find myself thinking I can rebuild a project (or usually improve upon an existing one) in just a few days.  And yet when it comes down to making anything well, it still takes time and iteration. It’s a bit funny because I felt this way before coding agents as well, like you could clone something in just a few weeks. But in practice my expectations are…&quot;&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48621748&quot; title=&quot;I find myself fixing the spec of my software often, and that makes lots of existing code obsolete. Creating working code is getting cheaper with AI, but creating great specs which make the software easy and intuitive to use seems to be more difficult for AI. Why? Because you  have to actually use the product to discover what is wrong, or sub-optimal, with it.&quot;&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48621813&quot; title=&quot;Yeah exactly, I literally don’t know how to change my spec until I’ve gathered more data. I was building a transaction classifier recently and I initially thought it would be a trivial “solved” problem. Throw transactions into a tiny local LLM, let it classify.  But that approach was too slow, and not accurate enough.  I didn’t know that though until I tried and then needed to change the spec.&quot;&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48621069&quot; title=&quot;Yes, I roughly agree with all of this. In fact, for most of my existence, I&amp;#39;m been one of those cheap programmers. The circumstances that led to me trying to push River for the next few months were somewhat accidental, and it felt like a good moment to at least make a go of trying to make it work. I&amp;#39;m not committing the rest of my career/life to any particular decision one way or the other. I&amp;#39;ll reiterate too that I believe we&amp;#39;re still quite early in the LLM age and are still waiting for the…&quot;&gt;[7]&lt;/a&gt;. There is a strong consensus that software purchasing is rarely a purely rational calculus; developers are notoriously frugal, and enterprise procurement often creates bureaucratic hurdles that cost far more than the software itself &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48620915&quot; title=&quot;Be careful with making decisions about your livelihood based on a rational calculus. As you correctly point out, there is a threshold for which a programmer or company should not even blink at the cost of software. It&amp;#39;s often the case that if the software they&amp;#39;re buying saves one single hour of productivity, it&amp;#39;s value-positive... and yet they won&amp;#39;t buy it. Individual devs are notorious for refusing to pay a cent out of their own wallet, turning up their noses at anything that isn&amp;#39;t offered…&quot;&gt;[0]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48621308&quot; title=&quot;Plus, too many companies don&amp;#39;t spend their money in a logical fashion. As a manager, you can direct your $200,000/year engineer in any way you want, but try to spend any amount of money on a new SaaS product and procurement might huffily demand hours of your time and weeks of delay to authorize even $40/month, let alone $400/month. That said, I think the path Brandur is describing is well-trodden and proven out by projects like Sidekiq.&quot;&gt;[8]&lt;/a&gt;. However, some argue that refusing to buy &amp;#34;no-brainer&amp;#34; tools is actually a rational response to the long-term burdens of integration, security exposure, and maintenance that every new dependency introduces &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48621636&quot; title=&quot;I have multiple side projects that I would never have contemplated building before but whose utility now exceeds the much lower cost to build. I got a few weeks in to each and then stalled on all of them because the effort and motivation required to extend beyond the crazed early days _is_ still more than the utility I get. In a professional context, paying someone for software to do something outside my core domain is still the practical option compared to the motivation and effort needed to…&quot;&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48621251&quot; title=&quot;Dismissing software non-buyers as irrational, or asserting certain purchases are &amp;#39;no-brainers&amp;#39; is missing the mark. Acquiring new software is a major commitment beyond just the price tag. It means integration, continuous maintenance, dealing with forced UI updates, supply chain exposure, and so on. Every seasoned dev (unless very lucky) has dealt with bad software acquisitions, almost all of which seemed to be great deals at the time of purchase.&quot;&gt;[9]&lt;/a&gt;. Ultimately, the &amp;#34;community effect&amp;#34; of professional software provides a positive externality—where niche requests benefit all users—that isolated, AI-generated solutions cannot yet replicate &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48621311&quot; title=&quot;I wouldn&amp;#39;t underestimate the community effect of software. There are plenty of features that get shipped because a small but important minority requested them, only to benefit the long tail of users who never knew to ask for such a feature but now find it indispensable. If everyone is building their own isolated solutions, how does this positive externality manifest itself?&quot;&gt;[6]&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your daily &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.ycombinator.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hacker News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; summary, brought to you by &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALCAZAR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://alcazarsec.com/&quot;&gt;Protect what matters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>